lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Death

message: I have checked the edition notice/copyright page of the original version of Buried Alive: The terrifying history of our most primal fear by Bondeson, Jan. The book was published in 2001 by W. W. Norton & Company. The same is mentioned on Kirkus Reviews, Research Gate, JSTOR, and Cambridge University Press. The confusion about the publication date (2001 vs. 2002) stems from the Barnes & Noble listing which clearly mentions it as a reprint in 2002.
As such, I have removed the verification tag from the bibliography section of the article. UMStellify (talk) 23:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography verified 

message: The redirect Not alive has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Not alive]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: the word 'taxon' is spelled wrong 61.239.74.133 (talk) 11:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: As you haven't specified where you are talking about, I can't be certain that I'm looking in the right place. However, under Death#Extinction in the first sentence, the word "taxa" is used and wikilinked to Taxon. "Taxa" is correct in this sentence, as it is the plural of "taxon" and the plural form should be used in that context. Tollens (talk) 19:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 September 2023 

message: The second sentence in this section, which begins with the word "Especially," is a sentence fragment. Because this article has some type of protection, I was unable to correct this mistake (which I would have done by replacing the preceding period with a comma and changing the capital E in especially to a lowercase. 198.168.106.100 (talk) 16:59, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . Rasnaboy (talk) 18:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence fragment in section on Natural Selection 

message: makes no sense to put abortion here since a foetus is never alive. Something which isn't alive cannot die. 148.252.146.55 (talk) 05:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is probably acceptable; most would argue that the fetus is, biologically, alive, but in the sense of death as it’s usually put an abortion might not qualify as the “death” of a conscious being. More discussion necessary. OverzealousAutocorrect (talk) 18:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death before birth 

message: dead baby in womb being attacked by cells Ballseater (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  calcium baby
Talk:World peace

message: Has world wide peace ever existed, for a year, or even a day? 
Seems a worthy angle for the article. TessT (talk) 18:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: NO PORQIE SIN EMBARGO NO QUISIERON LA PAS ALO QUE SE DESIDIO SEGUIR CON LA GUERRA DEJANDO MUCHAS PERSONAS ERIDAS 190.87.165.252 (talk) 00:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Has it ever been achieved?

message: ma 197.220.89.63 (talk) 09:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  topic about Educatoin and time
Talk:Amsterdam

message: Why is there a Thai translation? I understand why there’s Dutch but not Thai. SuperNova422 (talk) 16:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thai translation 

message: There seem to be some discrepancies between the sister cities listed on the English-language Amsterdam page and the Dutch-language Amsterdam page and I was curious as to why that's the case. Here are the sister cities on the Dutch-language page, since Dutch is the official language of the Netherlands it seems like this would be the most accurate depiction of Amsterdam's partnerships:
*  Athens (Greece)
*  Berlin (Germany)
*  Mumbai (India)
*  Boston (United States)
*  Brussels (Belgium) 
*  Casablanca (Morocco)
*  Chisinau (Moldavia)
*  Hanoi (Vietnam)
*  Istanbul (Turkey)
*  İzmit (Turkey)
*  Larache (Morocco)
* } London (United Kingdom)
*  New York City (United States)
*  Paris (France)
*  Peking (China)
*  San Francisco (United States)
*  São Paulo (Brazilië)
*  Seoul (South Korea)
*  Shenzhen (China)
*  Şişli (Turkey)
*  Stockholm (Sweden)
*  Tangier (Morocco)
*  Tokyo (Japan)
}}
Also internation cooperation with:
*  Curaçao
*  Sint Maarten
*  Zapopan (Mexico (land))https://web.archive.org/web/20191003061614/http://www.zapopan.gob.mx/soy-turista/relaciones-internacionales/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiscipidier (talk • contribs) 15:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister Cities 

message: It's a bit extraordinary that this article makes no mention of slavery, when Amsterdam was a leading port city of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. A rather starling omission. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 20:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of slavery?

message: The map is out of date, the Municipality of Weesp is added to the municipality of Amsterdam. 
31.21.223.74 (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weesp 

message: I was comparing population density of places in the Netherlands using the  Municipalities of the Netherlands article. The total population and density of Amsterdam is not the same in both articles. Close but not the same. Is it the date of the data, or different definitions of what comprises Amsterdam? 
Density in that article is 4,812/km2 (12,460/sq mi)
and population is 903,399, footnote says as of 1 January 2022.  The density in this article about Amsterdam is higher. - - Prairieplant (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the same data as Municipalities list page 

message: When did Allied forces take the city after the Normandy invasion?CountMacula (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of liberation during WWII
Talk:William Ernest Henley

message: I've heard that William Ernest Henley had a foot amputated; this is not mentioned anywhere in the article.
:Yes. 'Henley amputation' gives a number of good Google hits. It was as a result of TB, and can be added. Charles Matthews 08:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foot Amputation 

message: Something has obviously been cut off at the beginning of the second paragraph.
Kostaki mou 03:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omission 

message: I notice the infobox but nowhere else on the page his name is given as William Ernest L. Henley - what did L. stand for, if this is not a vandalism? If it stands for an actual name it should also be mentioned on the introductory line of text.Cloptonson (talk) 20:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Queried Initial

message: I am beginning a citation review for this article, given the opening query regarding plagiarism, and the propensity of some WP editors to use the 1911 EB as an excuse not to give credit (in this case, to William Price James, the author of the 11th edition EB article), but also to hide other bits of unreferenced material in the broader swaths of EB material that is without inlines. I will affix an under construction tag. PLease be patient, this could take up to a week.  Le Prof  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.87.100 (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article citation review beginning

message: Hey fellows. I'm French and I intend to complete the Complete Works in the Wikipédia.fr's article of Mr.William Ernest Henley. We have to complete the Henly's works, chronologically and properly. So let's go ! Because this section is not clearly made. 
- First, published works as alive writer, poet and critics
- Two, posthumous works.
- Three, Moderns editions.
--Wilburo2691 (talk) 16:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of complete Chronological Works missing ? 

message: 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒂𝒎 𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝒉𝒆𝒏𝒍𝒆𝒚 223.196.168.140 (talk) 11:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  𝑾𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒉 𝒂𝒘𝒂𝒓𝒅 𝒉𝒆 𝒈𝒐𝒕
Talk:Biosafety

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+biosafety+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.45.18 (talk) 06:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The relationship between the topic and ecology.... 

message: * Baculoviruses - http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+biosafety+baculoviruses&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.45.18 (talk) 06:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The relationship of the topic and virus.... 

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=disease+control+fecal&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
* http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=disease+control+fecal&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--58.38.45.18 (talk) 06:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The relationship between fecal and disease control.... 

message: This article has been rated a B-class and as such there is an expected criteria for this class. A C-class might be expected to have an over-abundance of External links, subject to cropping, but this article has 15 named and two unnamed links in the "External links" section. Statistically there are 37 references with 17 external links or almost a 46% ratio. While 3 or 4 might be acceptable, possibly 5 with consensus, this section needs content transferred into the body of the article (used as references) or chopped in half, then chopped in half again, as Wikipedia is not a linkfarm. Otr500 (talk) 13:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Novel coronavirus biosafety level 2409:4060:18C:1813:3802:4B23:93C6:CD2E (talk) 03:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the biosafety lavel for COVID 19 SARS coronavirus? 

message: https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/85583/is-there-any-biosafety-level-scale-for-plant-pathogens  Kindly update this article with plant pathogen biosafety 2409:4060:18C:1813:3802:4B23:93C6:CD2E (talk) 03:07, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here is a discussion about plant pathogen biosafety level
Talk:The Bronx

message: I propose deleting the inclusion of Joseph P. Day in the "See also" list. He seems like too obscure a figure to include.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoffeeBeans9 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete Joseph P. Day reference? 

message: It's quite bizarre that the area numbers only have 2 significant figures, while the population density figures have 6. Choose to round both or neither. Kk.urban (talk) 21:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population density
Talk:Peter the Great and the Russian Empire

message: We don't delete information without justification here.
Genyo 02:30, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: User:DrBug clearly stated it being that the information you gave is contradicted against. The name "Russia" isn't that young. Marcus2 02:39, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

text: I don't know when the word 'Russia' (Rossiya) came about, but the name Rus'  is AFAIK quite ancient. --Smack 19:24, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Bromeliales

message: * Bromeliales I tried to fix this stub, but i found that the taxonomy of the Bromeliales and their closest relatives is heavily disputed among scientists. Not being a plant taxonomist, i feel unable to do that subject justice. The article needs attention by someone knowledged in plant taxonomy. Lady Tenar 16:05, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Reference probably best deleted or moved to Bromeliaceae:
: 
Brya 08:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref
Talk:Nevi'im

message: Hi. The text you removed on cantillation is, as you said, duplicated in Haftarah. But when you removed it, you left the following paragraph completely out of context! Furthermore, there is no reason why the material belongs more in Haftarah than in Nevi'im - it is equally relevant to both from opposite angles.
I suggest either fixing the article up without the material or else putting it back. Dovi 23:01, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)
Okay, I fixed up this article. The info about the rare trop is not relevant to haftarah, but is relevant here, so I included it here, not there. —msh210 04:09, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 

message: The list in the article includes Daniel at 
roman numeral IV.  But he's also listed 
in the Ketuvi'im.  I think the latter is 
correct.  I didn't make the edit myself
because I'm not sure about the fix, I just
know that the wiki is contradicting itself
about Daniel's place in the canon.
Msvitale 22:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Daniel is definitely in Ketuvim as stated in the Talmud (Bava Batra 14b). -- -- --  23:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  isn't Daniel in Ketuvi'im, not Nevi'im? 

message: These two articles discuss the same subject.  They should be merged. Neelix (talk) 22:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Nebim]] 

message: I would suggest adding the following External link:
* Nevi'im (Judaica Press) translation at Chabad.org
-- -- --  21:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: I've changed the secondary spelling given in the article to "nəḇî’îm" for the same reasons given for the similar change in the Ketuvim article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ketuvim). Cevlakohn (talk) 05:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  N'bhi'im vs. Nəḇî’îm 

message: This article contains a lot of off-topic material concerning the concept of prophethood in Judaism. It needs to be rewritten to focus on the Nevi'im, the second section of the Tanakh. Most of the off topic material should be at Prophet#Judaism, not here. Editor2020 (talk) 03:52, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus on the Nevi'im 

message: Why does this article not have any Etymology? As it is the most-controversial section title of the Hebrew Bible, it should have the most-extensive etymology, showing where this word came from. Misty MH (talk) 10:17, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology missing 

message: Why does "sons of the prophets" redirect here? They were a group of people exclusively referenced in the Elisha story of 2 Kings, and have nothing to do with this page's topic, as far as I know. 141.156.182.177 (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sons of the Prophets
Talk:Coordinate covalent bond

message: Perhaps this would be better incorporated into Covalent bond? I'm not a chemist, so perhaps there's enough information available that this could become an encyclopedia article in its own right, but thought I'd point it out, so someone more knowledgeable than me can make the decision.  Rgamble
:Oppose: (This proposal dates from 2002 but someone just got around to adding the  to it:) Coordinate bonding is a special case of coordinate bonding, but there is a large amount of material that is specific to coordinate bonding of metals and metal-centered coordinate compounds and is quite unrelated to the "covalent bond" nature. That information is present on the Complex (chemistry) page, not the Covalent bond page. Merging into the latter substantially de-emphasizes the "complex" sense vs the "just another type of covalent bond", and I think that the former is a major sense of the term. DMacks 03:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: In the article it is said that ammonium posesses 4 dative bonds. Isn't that wrong?Bastard Soap 18:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Error?

message: Does sulphuric acid contain any coordinate covalent bonds?
Good question.  Yes and no.  Some people call the S=O bonds "+S-O-" bonds.  If you're really nuts about insisting that sulfur has an octet, then no.  If you aren't, then it does.  The "true" structure lies somewhere between, depending on how much of a stickler you are about resonance structures and contributions.  Remember, elements with access to d-shells can have more than 8 electrons flying around.
--Takometer 01:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, most texts indicate that d-orbitals have zero to do with hypervalency.  Although it is a comforting thought that has calmed the masses for years.--Smokefoot 02:11, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sulphuric Acid 

message: The first line of the article says the more common name is coordinate covalent bond. Personally while studying chemistry, I never heard the term dipolar bond to refer to this. So why is the title not the more common name?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.162.142.171 (talk) 15:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that coordinate covalent bond is the more usual term and should be the article title. A Google search shows 49 000 hits for coordinate covalent bond (with quotes to require the entire phrase) and only 3 000 for dipolar bond (also with quotes). Dirac66 (talk) 21:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Chemistry

message: Alchemical tradition
Prechemical tradition
Medical tradition
Technical tradition
Phlogistic tradition Joybubexe (talk) 11:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of chemistry 

message: 124.104.9.39 (talk) 12:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2023 

message: — Assignment last updated by UBC24 AT (talk) 04:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

message: Hello everyone! I have a plan to improve the subdisciplines portion of this article:
-         I’d like to include an example of each subdiscipline’s chemistry. For example, I would include a wet lab synthesis or even a minor reaction in Organic Chemistry, or something like a metallocentre species for Inorganic/Organometallic Chemistry
-         I’d add images about these examples, or even people/application/other appropriate illustrations about that specific subdiscipline to give it a face.
-         I’d clean up and add more than one citation for everything, so that each subdiscipline has more room to be discussed.
-         I’d add even more hyperlinks/referenced pages to make each subdiscipline more unique. I'd of course get good reliable sources.
Please let me know what you think!!!
CoolChemist (talk) 04:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the idea of illustrating topics (especially if they highlight a key distinguishing feathre), and the §Disciplines section seems like it could be better-organized or explained. And it is already tagged as needing better citations. Contrast that with the other sections, that have prose and representative images. But I fear this already-long article will become even more unwieldy if more detail is added to that list. See WP:SUMMARYSTYLE for general guidance about a hierarchy of articles. Please also think carefully about the audience of an article that is just "chemistry", the overall topic, and whether they would benefit from any technical detail at all. DMacks (talk) 04:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! Making this less accessible and being more technical is NOT the goal! Thanks for the advice and the link to the summary style page, I had no idea it existed. CoolChemist (talk) 03:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What is Uuo ? 185.206.82.81 (talk) 09:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHEM 300 Student's Project 

message: Tell me thx 185.206.82.81 (talk) 09:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Uuo on electronegativity?
Talk:Best, worst and average case

message: I merged this with average performance and did some cleanup. I'll leave any extra work (and this article could use it) for others to do. 
--Phils 16:01, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Linear search on an array has a worst-case performance O(n) (see Big O notation), because in the worst case, the algorithm has to check every element. However, the average running time is O(n/2).
This is a poor example, because O(n/2) is really just O(n) as well in Big O notation (the 1/2 is just a scalar multiple).--Malcohol 13:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with average performance 

message: This kind of analysis differs from the other two in that we consider not the algorithm but the problem itself. It should really be referred to as 'best worse case' analysis, because we aim to arrive at bounds on the performance of all possible algorithmic solutions, assuming their worst case. 
Best case analysis is based on a consideration of the logical demands of the problem at hand - what is the very minimum that any algorithm to solve this problem would need to do, in the worst case, for an input of size n?
:I don't think you ever do best case analysis on the problem.  There will almost always be an algorithm that have a constant best case performance.  Taemyr (talk) 18:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This content is confusing "best case" with "lower bounds"; you can very well analyze the best case performance of a specific algorithm over all inputs (see the table in sorting algorithm for example). On the other hand, a lower bound can specify the minimum resources required in the worst case, with the minimum taken over all possible algorithms, a good example being the Ω(n log n) lower bound on comparison sorts. Dcoetzee 21:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content from best case 

message: I propose the three articles Best, worst and average case, Worst-case complexity and Average-case complexity be merged to make one informative and complete article. --Robin (talk) 16:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm removing the merge tag. After over three years, there is no discussion on this topic. If you still want to merge, I suggest that you be WP:BOLD and WP:JUSTDOIT. WTF? (talk) 14:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: What is worst case space complexity?
Worst case space complexity and worst case performance both link here. It is explained what is worst case perfomance, but what is worst case space complexity? They are different things, because article [|quicksort ] has both of them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmasta (talk • contribs) 22:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:Agritourism

message: I would like to start making some edits and adding external links to the Agritourism project. In fact, I am interested in transferring information I have been maintaining on my own academic website to Wikipedia pages. Agritourism happens to be my specialty, so I thought it best to start here. Regarding external agritourism links, I have carefully selected about 20 or so that I feel meet Wikipedias standards, but want to be careful not to turn this into a repository of external links as Wikipedia states. As this is my first foray into the world of Wikipedia editing, I would appreciate your experienced guidance in this process.Delayreality 05:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello friend, maybe you could suggest those links here, for now? MarekTT (talk) 22:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding external links to Agritourism 

message: Some suggestions to expand this article... ex: find villages from other wikipedia articles that are agrotourism sustained (I added the village Agros, in Cyprus). More related external links (check out some useful links and resources collection here: ... another problem is that from country to country the definition of what constitutes "agrotourism" differs, sometimes dramatically. I am currently doing a research to gather various definitions and try to find common grounds for a diversified description. So, your ideas are welcomed, cheers MarekTT (talk) 22:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call for further contributions 

message: file=:c:File:Agritourism - The Vaidelotes farm, in Bauska Municipality, Zemgale, Latvia.jpg|patten=No permission indicated subpage= 
Message automatically deposited by a robot on 07:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons