Talk:Tiana (The Princess and the Frog)

message: Sorry to split semantic hairs, but I'm pretty sure African-American is a race and/or ethnicity, not a nationality. Tiana's nationality would probably be American (or possibly Maldonian?).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.238.105.162 (talk) 16:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nationality: African-American"? 

message: I thought that title belonged to Pocahontas or Snow White.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.194.238.156 (talk) 21:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That should be "African-American".  It's been corrected. Cactusjump (talk) 21:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

text: It seems she is not a princess to start with but marries "free-spirited, jazz-loving Prince Naveen of Maldonia". I guess I could have put a spoiler warning on that, but heck, anyone who can't work that out is probably too young to be reading this. DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

text: I wonder if we should also make the point of her being an American princess. It's far less talked about than her being the first black princess (don't criticise, that's how many sources describe her) and I don't know if she's the first or second (was Pocohontas a princess?) but if there are a few references maybe a mention is worthwhile. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't see any articles mentioning her as being a stand-out American princess (since Pocahontas is considered part of the franchise), just the uniqueness of her being the first African-American princess.  But I think it should be included that she is not born to royalty, as other Disney princess articles make that clarification. Cactusjump (talk) 17:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First American Princess? 

message: Just as the Barack Obama page points out that he is the first African-American president in the history of the United States, this article has ONE sentence stating that Princess Tiana is the first African-American princess in the history of Disney animation.  There are two works cited that discuss that this is groundbreaking in the history of Disney's princesses, and is therefore relevant to the article.  Cactusjump (talk) 18:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First African-American Princess 

message: Just passing by, but I think Tiana can be considered an official Disney Princess as she is shown on the Disney Princess page on their website : http://disney.go.com/princess/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.92.127 (talk) 00:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is indicated in the article in several places. Thanks, though! Cactusjump (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

text: She's still talked about in the future tense in a couple of places, but I'm going to fix them. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreleased? 

message: I find it hilarious that in the brief bio of Tiana on the right-hand side of the page that under "species" it says "frog (briefly)."  It might be more accurate if the word "briefly" appeared next to human.  According to my recollection, Tiana is in human form for 15 minutes or so of a 95 minute film.  She is a frog for the majority of the film, which clearly does not describe "briefly."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mediacritickm (talk • contribs) 17:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  species 

message: How is Tiana a servant?  Generally, servants are people who tend to an individual or household on a regular basis, in most cases living with them, somewhat like a modern-day butler.  Tiana still lives in her own home, working two jobs as a waitress, a day and a night shift.--Changedforbetter (talk) 01:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Servant? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure)  Iffy★Chat -- 10:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Tiana (Disney character) →  – As per WP:NCFILM#Character articles: when disambiguation is needed, we should use the film/film series/franchise. This would also be WP:CONSISTENT with articles of many other Disney characters. See similar discussions at Talk:Scar (The Lion King)#Requested move 18 February 2018, Talk:Elsa (Frozen)#Requested move 28 February 2018, Talk:Ariel (The Little Mermaid)#Requested move 7 April 2018 and Talk:Aurora (Sleeping Beauty)#Requested move 22 April 2021. Pamzeis (talk) 02:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

text: *: I think there is good reason to consider the Disney Princesses as a whole and maintain consistency in their article titling. Currently,  I would support a multiple move request that unifies the naming of the full set and am agnostic on which disambiguator to use. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment: Well, for Snow White, Cinderella, Mulan, Pocahontas and Moana, their names are the same as their film's title and per NCFILM, they should use "(character)" to disambiguate. A lot of the characters names are used in other media. However, all the other characters of the same name seem to not have articles or are redirects so I'm not sure if we can move all the eponymous character articles to just "(character)". Also, Cinderella (character) and Moana (character) already redirect to the Disney character articles. Pamzeis (talk) 04:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment - I am actually opposed to Cinderella (character) and that should be redirected to or split off from Cinderella. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 June 2021