lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Principle of inertia (physics)

message: I think that it must not be stated in the encyclopedia such a description that diverge from the modern physical knowledge. In classical physics there is no mention of cause at all: it is said that momentum and motion are just connected to eash other, such that they always come together. But in quantum mechanics the operator of momentum is gradient of the wave function; and according to the Schroedinger equation, the spatial motion is caused by the gradient. So actually it comes that momentum is causing motion; and Buridan said almost the same: that impetus is causing motion. I don't know any branch of physics where it would be stated that momentum is caused by motion, except the case of poorly understood beginner's textbook. Fir-tree 00:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sec. 2.1 "Early understanding of motion": Momentum being caused by motion? WRONG! 

message: I've shortened the "novel interpretations" section -- perhaps complete deletion would be an alternative. For the purpose of further discussion, I'll quote the removed stuff here:
:A recent paper by the Swedish-American physisist Johan Masreliez proposes that the phenomenon of inertia may be explained, if the metrical coefficients in the Minkowskian line element were to change as a consequence of acceleration. A certain scale factor was found, which models inertia as a gravitational-type effect.Masreliez C. J., On the origin of inertial force, Apeiron (2006) A following paper for Physica Scripta explains how special relativity can be compatible with a cosmos with a fixed and unique cosmological reference frameMasreliez, C.J., Motion, Inertia and Special Relativity – a Novel Perspective, Physica Scripta, (Dec 2006). The Lorentz transformation might model "morphing" of moving particles, which might preserve their properties by changing their local spacetime geometries. With this the geometry becomes dynamic and an integral part of motion. He claims this changing geometry to be the source of inertia; it is said to generate the inertial force. If accepted, this would neatly connect special relativity with general relativity via inertia. However, although inertial frames still are physically equivalent in that the laws of physics apply equally, they do not model the same spacetime.
:Another approach has been suggested by Emil Marinchev (2002)Emil Marinchev (2002) UNIVERSALITY,  i.a. a new generalized principle of inertia . These ideas still have a way to go before leaving protoscience.
This falls well below the notability threshold, pls also compare WP:SCIENCE. If I'm mistaken and one of these approaches has progressed to be seriously debated by multiple researches, pls enlighten me.
Pjacobi 22:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel? 

message: Pls see Talk:Inertia#Merge. --Pjacobi 22:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Catharanthus

message: What about leukemia?
This article seems to be almost entirely about Catharanthus roseus, the best-known and most commonly cultivated species in the genus, and the species to which the name "Madagascar periwinkle" is most often applied (rosy periwinkle notwithstanding). Unless a lot more information is included on the other species in the genus I would recommend renaming the article Catharanthus with redirects from "Madagascar periwinkle", "Rosy periwinkle", and "Catharanthus roseus".
Hmmm, just had a second look at the history of this page. It started out being about the species Catharanthus roseus, which is commonly known as "Madagascar periwinkle", and somehow ended up being about the whole genus Catharanthus with the common name "Madagascar periwinkle" being applied to all the species in the genus. Apparently realizing the species deserves its own article, somebody else has re-started an article on Catharanthus roseus, this time under the rather uncommon common name "rosy periwinkle". Yeesh! This illustrates yet again why we should make the generic and specific names the article titles, with redirects from the "common names" and with disambigs when necessary. MrDarwin 01:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - MPF 15:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I think vinca alkaloids would warrant their own article. They are used in anti-cancer treatments  as well as in conditions requiring immunosuppression, and as this article states they are produced synthetically, not extracted from plants. Aspirin isn't found under willow, either. - Quirk (talk) 11:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vinca alkaloids
Talk:EPM

message: ----
See  (pdf) for Whitepaper Enterprise Performance Management: "The Global Advancement of Performance Management: Issues and Trends" -- 172.179.140.144 00:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

message: no article / redlink not linked to
*Efficient Portfolio Management, a description of the use of derivatives within the finance regulation of the European Union
Widefox; talk 12:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Outtakes
Talk:John Langdon (politician)

message: I don't actually care about this guy, and am too lazy to research him but.... "He turned down a nomination for Vice Presidential candidate in 1812, and later retired until he planned his death in 1819." is probably not appropriately phrased.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.2.51.190 (talk) 01:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have a problem with the following line. I saw this as I was researching Langdon for a school report. As the representative of a small state, wouldn't he have wanted the Senate to be granted more power? I'm not sure if this is inaccurate or just poorly phrased. Also, I followed the citation and found no reference to Langdon on that page.
During the 1787 Constitutional debates in Philadelphia, Langdon spoke out against James Madison's proposed "negative" on State laws simply because he felt that should the Senate be granted this power and not the House of Representatives, it would "hurt the feelings" of House members.[1]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.97.223.89 (talk) 21:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: During the 1787 constitutional debates in Philadelphia, Langdon spoke out against James Madison's proposed "negative" on state laws WithGLEE (talk) 14:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A reference to Madison's "negative" would be helpful. 
Talk:Diphosgene

message: This page is taken almost word for word from http://diphosgene.iqnaut.net/ without so much as a footnote or citation
: You may not have noticed the text at the bottom of that page: "iqnaut.net, 2005. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Diphosgene"." There is a correct citation: they cite us. – ClockworkSoul 01:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no such text... 83.227.130.26 (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have worked for and with a number of companies that make diisocyanates on an industrial scale, and to the best of my knowledge none of them use diphosgene. I did a search and could find nothing to contradict this. The 2005 edition of Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, , makes no mention of diphosgene in its article on diisocyanates. One reason for this may be that large scale synthetic photochemical reactions are rare. As my old photochemistry professor used to say "Photons aren't cheap reagents". 
Consequently, I removed the sentence about diphosgene replacing phosgene in the production of diisocyanates. Silverchemist (talk) 16:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industrial use 

message: Is diphosgene a replacement for phosgene that is used directly as a replacement for the phosgene, or is it used as a conveninient source for preparing phosgene which is then used in the normal fashion? Of course, it could also be that it is used as a direct replacement with a reaction mechanism involving transient formation of phosgene then reacting with other reagents. The present text is vague or ambiguous and needs clarification. 150.227.15.253 (talk) 09:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed
Talk:Cordia sebestena

message: Going by the scientifc name given, this article refers to the Large leaf Geiger tree, there is another species known as the small leaf geiger tree (Cordia parvifolia). --Mr. Dude †@£К ║ Çøת†яĭβü†ĬŎИ 00:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific name
Talk:Briarcliffe Acres, South Carolina

message: the state of South Carolina only has two type of municipalities, Towns and Cities.  I am changing this  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.87.237 (talk) 01:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Port of Vancouver (1964–2008)

message: This port is in fact owned by P&O Ports (see: http://www.poports.com/) which was recently purchased by Dubai Ports World, see: DP_World_controversy. (Theburlyman 00:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you may be confusing the terminals with the actual port itself . The Vancouver Port Authority is a Canadian crown corporation. -- Usgnus 02:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that. Thanks for the clarification! (Theburlyman 21:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's official... The port authorities of Metro Vancouver have merged. Please visit Vancouver Fraser Port Authority to read more.
I guess it's time to say this article is historical in nature?
Allan kuan1992 (talk) 07:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Port Authority 

message: What percentage of containers entering the port are inspected?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.8.30 (talk) 08:27, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspection 

message: I've boldly moved this article to the current title. The primary topic for Port of Vancouver is the current port. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 19:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold move
Talk:Cornwall Scout County (The Scout Association)

message: I have consulted with another editor - outside of Scouting.  Assuming good faith, I'm afraid that I cannot see that these new sites fit in with Wikipedia as they appear effectively nothing more than a list of branches of The Scout Association.  For further information on this please see the section Wikipedia is not a soapbox on Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, notably the section on advertising.  Even when open to Groups of all Associations these pages were of suspect standard, and closing them to independent Groups has not helped in any way.  
I suggest returning them to their original format, a new format that allows all Scouting in a County to be reported, or, alternatively, deleted as inappropriate.  -- DiverScout (talk) 18:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Kerygma

message: the greek citation for the derivation of kerygma is incorrect. it reads (incorrectly) kepusso. the letter pi has been used in place of the correct letter, rho. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  65.5.246.222  (talk • contribs)  00:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This implies that kerygma is a verb, but the rest of the article suggests it is a noun.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.71.127.36 (talk) 17:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: to preach or proclaim – kerygma
Talk:Pittsburgh LAN Coalition

message: Pittco Lite was much smaller than the rest because the event had to be moved to another facility with less than two weeks before the event.  Because of the sudden change, flyers and such could not be distributed and the newer venue was much smaller, thus Pittco Lite. Cdean 00:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A LAN party is a temporary gathering of people with computers, between which they establish a local area network (LAN), primarily for the purpose of playing multiplayer computer games.  This definition is from LAN party, for the benefit of those not familiar with the term. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of a LAN party
Talk:Intra-aortic balloon pump

message: It would be great if somebody had a good image to go with this article. Nomen Nescio 00:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Helium is a highly viscous gas due to it's high molecular velocity.  It can't be being used for its low-viscosity profile.  Chris Pruet  —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Viscosity of He

message: The article doesn't explain how is the balloon deflated (do we rely simply on increased aortal pressure, or is there a pump? if there's a pump, I'd imagine providing enough energy for it to operate over long time periods is challenging) nor where the control mechanism is placed (under the skin somewhere? or maybe externally to the patient, connected by induction or by transcutaneous wires?). Similarly, the article doesn't indicate whether this is a device that is usually permanently placed or is usually temporary. 85.195.223.119 (talk) 19:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing pieces of explanation 

message: Can people verify the relative contra-indications? I feel they are far fetched and do not represent a mainstream opinion. I feel we should take the subchapter out. Cinadon36 19:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative counter-indications
Talk:Surfside Beach, South Carolina

message: Should the references to "Attractions" and to the roads (other than US 17 and SC 544, which seem to have their own wiki links) be kept? Are they notable? There seems to be no other information available on them, and the attractions section, in particular, almost belongs in an AAA tourbook, rather than in an encyclopedia article. I'm not going to make the edits myself, but rather wanted to call attention to these to see whether others agreed that these portions should be removed or shown to be notable. Xenophon777 14:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability of "Attractions" and Roads Through the Town
Talk:Myrtle Beach Pelicans

message: I understand the chain of events that happened during the team's history, but the Pelicans didn't retain any history of their time when they played under the Durham Bulls name. So, it should be that the franchise was founded as the 97s but the roots dated back before their founding. The Triple-A Bulls retain the history of the Carolina League Bulls and also they are operating like the same team that played in the Carolina League. If anyone has links to articles or more information about these chain of events, fill free to share this information on this discussion page.
:Found some info on the durham bulls carolina league franchise relocation. Some articles state the bulls moved from single a ball to triple a ball, some articles say the bulls relocated and were replaced by a triple a franchise either saying just a triple a franchise or saying they were replaced by the triple a bulls, and some articles say the bulls fielded a triple a franchise. It's hard to figure out how this article should be set as. Most of these articles are from the same newspaper. To read these full articles, you have to buy them or register. Whoever wrote the first paragraph, make sure you include your signature next time. Links down below. 
:the team was promoted:  , 
:the team relocated: , , , 
:the bulls fielded a triple a team: , , 
:There's kind of a similarity to the Carolina Mudcats relocation. C.J. Ratt (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Whoever is adding Myrtle Beach Mermen or Kenny Powers from the HBO series Eastbound & Down needs to stop. Adding this info to the Pelicans article is showing that you completely disrespect the franchise. Leave the article alone and don't disrespect the team again. C.J. Ratt (talk) 01:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastbound & Down
Talk:Garden City, South Carolina

message: Although not generally known, the mouth of Murrells Inlet on the southern boundary of Garden City was the site of activity during the Civil War. Confederate blockade runners in shallow draft boats slipped through the Union cordon of ships and avoided their shot and shell inside the Inlet where the larger navy ships could not follow. On occasion, the Union shops would try to pursue the blockade runners by discharging landing parties who would beach their boats on Garden City Beach and traveling on foot inland. A Confederate camp named Camp Rutledge was nearby the mouth of the Inlet for a time. A bloody battle took place here between Confederate troops including cavalry and Union sailors or/or marines troops in which the Union suffered heavy losses. At least one Union sailor was buried in a shallow grave on one or the other side of the Inlet.
Experiences if J.E. Middleton During the Civil War, 8 Recollections and Reminiscences 1861-1865, p. 402 (U.D.C. 1998) (firsthand account of engagement by Middleton who participated in it).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.26.66 (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a long time visitor of Garden City, SC -- I've vacationed there with my family for over 20 years and plan to improve this page within the next week. I will be adding a section about attractions and plan to provide information about the Garden City Pier, the original Sam's Corner, Sara J's, the Yum Yum shop, Conch Cafe and more. I will also work on linking related Wikipedia articles such as Murrell's Inlet, Surfside Beach and Myrtle Beach, edit the section on Hurricane Hazel by adding information on Hurricane Hugo and add a recent picture of the area. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or recommendations for additional content.
--Johnsonar2 (talk) 03:22, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Attractions Section 
Talk:Tom Varner

message: If you have a picture of this person, please upload it to "Wikimedia Commons" (click on upload file) 
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload
If you say it's "entirely my own work" and "public domain" and give it a good filename like This_Persons_Exact_Name for example, then there won't be problems with the wikimedia copyright patrol. After the picture is uploaded, please record the exact filename below so it can be put in the picture. Thanks!--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture needed 

message: Found one on the WM commons. So, as Emily Littela of Saturday Night Live used to say, "never mind!"--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Not Needed
Talk:Hawker Tempest

message: Is there any good reason why the leading photo at the top of the page shows an early prototype Tempest, rather than an example demonstrating a more typical Tempest? A lot of people just briefly click on a link to glance at the picture and the lede to get an general idea of what the plane looks like and what it's about. I doubt the article on the He 111 shows an early model with conventional stepped canopy, for example. It probably shows a "typical" He 111 with the famous stepless canopy. Same for the Do 17. The picture of the Mustang is undoubtedly a P-51D with bubble canopy, not a Mustang I with full-height fuselage, nose guns, Allison engine, etc. The picture of the prototype (especially from the side) just looks like a Hawker Typhoon. Perhaps it's not good to reward people for being lazy, but still, I've been in that postion myself. I'd hate to be the person who came away with the impression that a Hawker Tempest basically looked just like a Typhoon because that was the picture that came up next to "Hawker Tempest". The majority of the Tempests built looked very little like the prototype, especially the later versions. I think a bubble-canopy, Centaurus-engined version with the large tail, etc, would be a far better choice for the main image, although a Sabre engined one would be fine as well, especially if it was taken from an angle which shows the different wing planform off a bit. At the very least, not a car-door-canopy, Typhoon-tailed (and landing gear) equipped one. Those photos belong in the section dealing with development and history, not at the top of the page as an example of what a Tempest looks like. Just my opinions on the matter, for what they are worth.
Idumea47b (talk) 19:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Use a picture of the most produced model in the lead, whichever it is, as that is the most representative for the type. The article doesn't really say, but I think most wartime photos tend to show Tempest Mk Vs.AadaamS (talk) 05:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have swapped the lead image for one of a production Mk V. Feel free to revert it if you prefer it as before.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.115.28 (talk) 08:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading photo
Talk:Lifetime (band)

message: I plan on updating the discography and making it pretty comprehensive.  Lifetime was one of my all time favorite bands! Pxc3580 (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifetime Discography

message: The website cited in the info box, lifetimenj.com, does not/no longer exists; it directs to a GoDaddy domain park page.
Upon checking the MySpace Music page for Lifetime, I found another website, lifetime-nj.com. Again, the domain is registered and the server is even live, but an Apache 404 error comes up.
I don't get it, but if anyone has managed to dredge up a valid website for the group (I searched extensively, and found nada), feel free to put it up.
For right now, I'll put the MySpace site up, but even it's a touch out-of-date.
Joe5150 (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifetime Website 
Talk:Rum Jungle, Northern Territory

message: hope i've tagged this correctly. While only of low importance in the scheme of WP Oz overall, I suggest it is of mid-importance as a place, being quite well-known because of the prominence of the issue of mining and subsequent pollution at this site. Apologies if tagging done wrongly. Cheers hamiltonstone (talk) 03:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance