lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:All Work & No Play

message: I have the following tracks:
#Be Rad (2:12)
#Cojack (2:43)
#Never Underestimate My Jesus (3:14)
#I'm Lion-O (3:41)
#My Cape Is Stuck In The Phone Booth (2:52)
#Register (1:39)
#Show And Tell (2:44)
#Snake Charmer (1:13)
#William (1:58)
Could someone tell me whether what I have is just a totally different demo? HokieRNB (talk) 15:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other songs?

message: The redirect All work and no play has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  —Panamitsu (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:All work and no play]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Deck the Halls, Bruise Your Hand

message: Now look, I've agreed that Relient K can be called Pop punk, and even most of their albums/EP's/singles to be called Pop punk, but this album is made up of Christmas songs and Christianity-related songs, and I refuse to let that be called Pop punk.--WatchHawk 01:10, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "For us, it's a faith, not a genre", Jon Foreman of Switchfoot--User:NFAN3|NFAN3 12:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

message: on the back of the cover, it looks like an * after its name.  It looks like part of the design.  Should I scan it?--User:NFAN3|NFAN3 12:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Track 8
Talk:The Creepy EP

message: I moved the pop culture section here. I think this information is easily folded into the article.
The four band members are pictures on the back of this EP, each as an "Employee of the Month" for a different month. Matt Thiessen, Matt Hoopes, Dave Douglas and Brian Pittman for May, June, July and  August accordingly. The front cover shows the band's friend Aaron Marrs as the Employee of the Month for September. Marrs was a part of the design and/or layout of many of the album covers for the band, including this EP's cover and the cover of Two Lefts Don't Make a Right...but Three Do.
--Guerillero | My Talk  00:34, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  In pop culture section
Talk:Andrea Lowell

message: I know this article is a stub, but more facts and less celebrations on her. --Ohyeahmormons 14:03, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased

message: She's a pretty girl who doesn't need to prove herself.  Plenty of porno acresses have bios here. 08:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed template

message: This article does not cite any reliable sources to support notability of the subject.  The article may be a candidate for speedy deletion under A7 and/or G11. OccamzRazor (talk) 22:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Given previous version of the article that had more meat in the text I would be of the mind that the article would be better suited for an afd than for csd. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

text: It's a poor quality article, but I have to say that as a participant in The Surreal Life, she would probably pass the notability test. I believe everyone else who appeared in that show has a Wikipedia article. Robofish (talk) 21:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed speedy deletion 
Talk:Pinchot State Forest

message: The coordinates of this forest are the coordinates of downtown scranton.  Does anyone have any real coordinates for this?  If not, we shoudl remove the coordinates if possible since they are useless. Mrendo 18:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/forestry/stateforests/lackawanna/index.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Minimac (talk) 06:46, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In further detail, the copyrighted content was added here by 50.29.134.47. Minimac (talk) 06:46, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Augusta County Public Schools

message: I would like to suggest merging the contents of Stuarts Draft High School into the Augusta County Public Schools article.  I don't believe we'll have enough information about the single school to make a full-bodied article, but in its context as part of the full school system, it makes a bigger "splash".
Mind you, some high schools are notable enough to have freestanding articles.  T. C. Williams High School is a good example of a notable high school, as it was featured in the movie Remember the Titans.  I just don't see SDHS being so notable at this point in time, and so we might as well bundle it in with the other schools.
Comments?  SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging in SDHS article
Talk:Neil Blair

message: I corrected the links for "Atens" and "Princess Alexandra" to what I think are the right links. Since, as far as I know, there is no military presence on the Aten asteroids (where the link was pointing), I figured that Atens was a typo of Athens, and I changed the link to match.  The Princess Alexandra link pointed to a disambiguation page - I picked Princess Alexandra, The Honourable Lady Ogilvy, as the only living member of the royal family to be named Alexandra.  
My question is this: how can Blair be Private Secretary to both Princess Alexandra AND the Duke of York at the same time? YggdrasilsRoot 19:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected Links and Factual Inconsistency
Talk:2006 Maryland county executive elections

message: Corrected previous editor's misconception that Barbara Samorajczyk was a potential Green Party candidate.  She was never formally approached by the Anne Arundel Green Party, nor (to the best of my knowledge) would she seriously consider their offer if they made it.  Also added Greens back to Potential Candidates since the Anne Arundel Green Party is still currently considering running a candidate for County Executive and is looking for candidates for this position. Robbblack 19:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections
Talk:Mark Tushnet

message: If no citation can be found for the "socialism" quote, I recommend deleting it.  Also, the "doo-doo" quote doesn't seem very relevant to anything, nor particularly clever.
:Apparently it appears in The Dilemmas of Liberal Constitutionalism, 42 Ohio St. L.J. 411, 424 (1981)   Schoen 02:00, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vivica A. Fox

message: Changing birthplace to original location from Indianapolis, Indiana to South Bend, Indiana.  Information currently posted is incorrect as noted in her biography and easily found on her official website (http://www.vivicafox.com/Index1.htm).  Amoradocat 02:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: I removed the hatnote "This article is about the actress Vivica A. Fox. For the former president of Mexico, see Vicente Fox". I find its inclusion odd, since they don't actually share the same name and we don't need hatnotes for every two people with a common last name and two letters in common in their first name. Even less when they're from different countries with different professions and of different sexes.  reverted me with edit summary "the Vincente Fox page has similar language". That's not a great reason to me, but as I hadn't seen it on the other page, I removed it from there as well. Is there some reason I'm not aware of to have this? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote? 

message: Greetings I wanted to know under the section regarding her personal life there was a gentleman mentioned by the name of Omar Slim White. If I wanted to create a wiki about him is that possible? He's a public figure as well Latrina1974 (talk) 20:28, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life 

message: So we can know more about the person childhood. 2603:6081:400:7CB:16F:76DE:DF8:C381 (talk) 02:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Of The Early Life
Template talk:Tomorrow

message: This template needs to be rewritten to take advantage of m:ParserFunctions#.23time:. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (hopefully). Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also added the "long" parameter to this template to display the date in longhand i.e. . This is currently counter-intuitive to  and  but this was the case before my changes, and I did not want to break this template since it is used on a number of crucial pages. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Pleased add between the noinclude tags, above the categories:

--Bsherr (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This resolved itself when I split off a documentation page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 19:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection template
Talk:Horacio Quiroga

message: A lot of the text in the article is taken verbatim from the litweb.net page listed in the "External links". Someone should do a substantial rewrite or the article will have to be deleted. CapnPrep 19:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a rewrite, but I couldn't find a whole lot of english sources that weren't reprints of the litweb article.  Still needs more work.  I'll look at some Spanish sources later.  If anyone sees any clunky syntax, feel free to correct, but this edit should take this article off the copyright violation burner. -steventity 21:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Yahya

message: The content here is what I copied and pasted from John the Baptist. Some cleanup will be needed. Tom Harrison Talk 19:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: According to Meteorology_(Aristotle) some guy named Yahya wrote a compendium of Aristotelen works, however, I don't believe the link to Yahya_of_Antioch is correct, anyone know more?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.128.30.66 (talk) 08:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meteorologica
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Cool Cat

message: http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?GoodBye is a useful and interesting read. Rob Church 19:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You just dont miss any opertunity right? I just do not understand why the heck do you want to get rid of me. I simply hate you for trolling me on IRC which is something you admited you were wrong. For a while I believed you untill my commons rfa. Afterwards I felt it was just the application of rule #76 of the Rules of Acquisition --Cool CatTalk|@ 19:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommended reading
Talk:Lost books of the New Testament

message: WP:V This is an article on a disputed area of bible interpretation.  There are differing positions and strong opinions in this area.  Someone familar with the subject should take a look at this article and describe the various positions. 
Useful reference on the controversy: .
I don't want to get into this one, but someone else might.
--Nagle 19:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I do not understand this article at all, the quotes its using as proof do not mention the books at all nor do they mention there should be a book, perhaps this article can be better explained? --zero faults |sockpuppets| 12:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they do? For example, the epistle from the Laodiceans is mentioned in the text, yet we know of no such letter. Or a prophecy that the Messiah would be a Nazarene is mentioned, yet we know of no prior book containing such a prophecy. pfahlstrom 23:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It says its a document, what I am saying is, it doesn't say it should be in the bible in any form. If I am missing something then its obvious this article needs some work in explaining its contents.  --zero faults |sockpuppets| 00:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Zero, your antecedents ("it doesn't say it") are mysterious. The intro is quite clear. This article describes "books referenced by, but not found in, the Bible." No assertion is made that the books "should be in the Bible," which would be a matter of opinion, and therefore inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. --The Editrix 19:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: Added because title of article is incorrect and misleading.  As I've stated in the merge discussion, "of" is defined as "Derived or coming from; originating at or from" or "from the total or group comprising", hence your usage of "of" in the title would denote that these books were at one time a sub-set of the New Testament" and therefore this is a logically incorrect title.  If this is not merged it needs to be moved to another title that correctly illustrates these are non-canonical books referenced in the New Testament that were never actually part of it, hence cannot be "lost".--Isotope23 14:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See my remark at Talk:Lost_books_of_the_New_Testament#Accuracy_Tag  Talk:Lost_books_of_the_Old_Testament#Accuracy_Tag. Dr Zak 16:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean "Old Testament talk"...--Isotope23 20:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. My mistake. Dr Zak 21:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer Missing Texts refered to in the Christian New TestamentHopquick 05:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy Tag
Talk:Toronto Marlboros

message: Fair use rationale completed. Flibirigit (talk) 02:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Toronto marlboros.gif

message: Rated class=start today due to a complete lack of references and inline citations.  It's a good, complete article, but has virtually supporting material.  PKT(alk) 23:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: 1957-58 Marlboro minor midget champions 2605:B100:132:69B:4806:A8DF:CBA9:A30B (talk) 22:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Marlboro minor midget champions
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Merging

message: I split this off from the main wikiproject talk page - add it to your watchlists.  We should probably also link to these discussions from the  template, and move some of the undirected discussion from the project page to the talk page. — jdorje (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was redirected/merged because 01W was a very weak tropical cyclone that caused very little impact and can be easily contained within the seasonal article.Jason Rees (talk) 17:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New project article

message: Start class. No significant improvement in about two years. Potapych (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hurricane Gert (1999)]]

message: Minimal impact. Ignored by authors for at least a year. Potapych (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hurricane Isaac (2000)]]

message: This was unmerged and almost nothing has been done to it. Potapych (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hurricane Lane (2000)]]

message: Barely improved since 2006. Potapych (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Typhoon Aere (2004)]]

message: redirected by someone  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unogarcia (talk • contribs) 05:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was redirected/merged because 01W was a very weak tropical cyclone that caused very little impact and can be easily contained within the seasonal article.Jason Rees (talk) 17:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Tropical Depression 01W (2012)]]
Talk:Msida

message: msida is a great town. the late prime minister Dr George Borg Olivier loved it a lot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.158.119.123 (talk • contribs) 
This article could do with some more citations. I'm really interested to learn more about the "old rock hewn chapel dedicated to the immaculate conception" (where is it exactly?!) and also about the reclamation of the land (when did that happen and who did it?). Also wondering if anyone thinks that Busy Bee warrants a mention in this article? :) Also: what is Il-Ġostra? It is mentioned then not explained. Omgplz (talk) 17:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Running of the Brides

message: Basic cleanup complete.
What category does "wierd human behavior" go under? --Nagle 19:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The gowns are not returnable.
Are wedding gowns ever returnable? I'd say it was the rule, rather than the exception. -HiFiGuy 20:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cold feet
Talk:S.C.I.F.I. World

message: This entry is simply an advertisment for television programming. Come on.
:Yeah, I agree. I've makeshifted a new one take this articles stead though. DrWho42 12:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: S.C.I.F.I. World/Temp
DrWho42 01:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Early this morning, I went through and created the list of shows that aired on Sci Fi's programming block of S.C.I.F.I. World... Though, I was wondering on whether inserting references would help out (i.e. when did either The Bionic Woman or Brimstone first air on Superhero and Inhumanland?) but the problem is that with my primary reference: Sci-Fi Channel schedule listings being divided up into months... Would it be wrong for the references to be title: 2000 Wed Jul 26 10:00 am Star Trek - Plato's Stepchildren and the like? DrWho42 20:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing.
Talk:Dart leader

message: Hi anonymous! Four '~ ~ ~ ~' tilde characters (no spaces) will sign your name or IP address so we know whom to address. I assume you have an account or will get one eventually if you haven't already. It's handy! Welcome to the community, if you're new. Wikipedia can always use new users willing to Be Bold. 
Not sure where OP got his info, but all the references I find are titled Dart Leader, not Dark Leader. Dark Leaders sounds a bit Star Wars-ish. Recommend that if the article is to remain, it should be fleshed out with more info from as many reputable sites as possible, and the name corrected to 'Dart leader' to more accurately reflect the name of the actual lightning-related phenomenon. I'd do it myself, but have been feeling a bit Bitten over another recent article, so I don't know that I feel comfortable tinkering with the WP namespace, at this juncture. But, hopefully this is fairly uncontroversial. References:
* The theory of the stepped and the dart leader
* Glossary of Meteorology Dart Leader
* Lightning Sequence
* Evolution of the Lightning Stroke 1 2 3 (Part 3 mentions Dart Leaders)
Lightning generally forms as opposite charges move from their original locations in streamers toward some common central connection point. Generally a negative charge from clouds and a positive charge from the ground. When these streamers connect, having generally ionized the air inbetween, the streamers form a channel of ionized air through which current can flow. This creates a Return Stroke. However, multiple strokes can occur along the same conductive ionized Channel in rapid succession. The return strokes are generally preceded by Dart Strokes or Dart Leaders that travel along the same conductive channel(s) as the original Return Stroke. 
This is also known as a Continuous Leader:
* Continuous Leader (Same as Dart Leader)
Mgmirkin 06:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name correction suggestion Dark Leader -> Dart Leader 

message: Is this an accurate statement? My understanding was that once the stepped leader connects with a positive streamer or another object the channel is formed and the air is ionized. Why then does the air need to be re-ionized by the Dart Leader, if it's already ionized by the initial stepped leader and the lightning flash? I think the article needs toe be fleshed out a bit more and citations added. I'm sure plenty can be found at meteorology sites... MAybe NOAA if thay have a glossary, or AMS, etc. Mgmirkin 07:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Serves to Ionize the Air?
Talk:Venice Boulevard

message: What about merging the state route into Venice Blvd? Eskrima
I do not understand the intricacies of how officially numbered state roads are managed in Wikipedia, but I thought there could be advantages to leaving SR 187 with its own page with an Infobox road for 187 itself, etc. If there is no particular reason to leave the state route with its own page, then I am all for merging that information into Venice Blvd. article. Rtmyers (talk) 13:12, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:M16 (disambiguation)

message: *Oppose -- this was previously discussed here, now .  M16 rifle was renamed after discussion, and the redirect was made into a proper abbreviation page here as usual.  Whether the rifle is the "most common" is irrelevant.  There is one user that lost the previous debate (twice, both July-August 2005, and January-February 2006), and continued a move and redirect campaign afterward. --William Allen Simpson 06:09, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment -- That debate was over the page name of M16 rifle, not if it was a primary source. It is not a ll irrelevant if it is the most common. Per Disambiguation#Primary_Topic if the majority of links go to it, that is a critical reason for a disambig. I not only did not loose the debate "twice"- I was not apart of the early discussion and the second was with 1 other person- but I did not start the quote "redirection campaign". It is called a Requested moves application- which was done by user Commander Keene. Ve3 16:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

text: *Comment' There was never a formal WP:RM, and even if you do, it has been more than 6 months. The debate about the correct page name took place in June 2005 and the talk between two people was in August 2005. Ve3 16:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

text: *Comment It is my understanding that anon. accounts do not facter in for votes.
*Support According to wikipedia policy- the major considerideration if a page shold be a primary source is the number of redirects that refer to the page. Of the links that link to M16 I have done a analysis on April 4 2006- there are about 56 links to this page. Of those, all but about four refer to the M16 rifle. Ve3 16:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: M16 →  – M16 should redirect to the rifle, which is far and away the primary topic. page views. Schierbecker (talk) 03:09, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

text: *Support Per nom. The next viewed page is MI6, which is a typo and not a real thing to disambiguate.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 April 2022