Talk:Carl Rogers

message: some WIKI code had been wrongly inserted in the text - this has now been corrected so that all textual citations are now listed in the "references" section. Some entries have been moved out of "references" to either "further reading" or "external links" - the references section should contain the "reflist" only.Shadygrove2007 (talk) 20:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned up reference section

message: The second paragraph of the section titled "Critical" should be deleted IMHO.  The reference (original) is to a xenophobic rant with no academic or scientific substance.  The logic is virtually non-existant, there are no references (what references there are point either to basic information e.g. biographies or to non-existant piblications such as "Journals").  I will delete it myself if no-one objects.  I have edited it in the meantime to provide references to other works by E.MichaelJones.  Re-reading the first para I think the entire section should be scrapped.
LookingGlass (talk) 09:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xenophobic spam?? 

message: If anyone is reading, I'm trying to track down the seminal quote: "Only in the face of unconditional positive regard can change occur" by Rogers or one of his disciples.  It's probably the best way to sum up Rogerian psychotherapy, IMHO, and would make a nice addition... if I knew where to cite it. siafu 23:33, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for Uncondition Positive Regard? 

message: I think this is doing the man a disjustice as "PSYCHOTHERAPY" is the Freudian term and Carl Rogers work is much more real-life (if you like) than the freudian example.
Thus this should be renamed "Human Centered Counselling" or "Human Centered" Therapy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.103 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 19 October 2005  (UTC)
:Hardly.  Psychotherapy is the common term for all methods.  Perhaps you are thinking of psychoanalysis, which does have a specifically Freudian connotation. siafu 02:19, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calling Carl Rogers work "Human Centred PSYCHOTHERAPY" 

message: This article takes whole paragraphs from my article at http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/rogers.html, which is copyrighted.  I am not fussy about it, but the quotations should either be referenced or rewritten!  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.82.216.178 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 30 March 2006  (UTC)
It seems as if this issue has been addressed, so why is there still a reference problem with this article?  If there are still problems, can someone point out specific sections which have copyright problems so they can be addressed specifically.
  why is the above comment not signed (even by the bot??) LookingGlass (talk) 09:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue 

message: I have moved this section out to a page on its own since it is a concept broader than its application to Rogers' theory. I have created a link to that new page in the text (Section: His Theory) and the See also section.
Matthew 09:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it has a place here showing Rogers' influences.--John Bessa (talk) 18:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Phenomenology section

message: * I wonder why the Carl Rogers Peace Project has not been mentioned here (within the article), his work in the former Sowjetunion in 1986 neither. Shouldn't those facts be mentioned, too?
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.93.138 (talk) 09:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Biographical overview

message: It is obviously illogical, someone made a mistake here. Was there seven or six children, and which of them was Rogers?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.100.205.223 (talk) 14:59, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography: "seventh of the six children" 

message: "Jeffrey Masson says in his book Against therapy that Rogers sometimes did his research with patients living within psychiatric or other wards not taking into account their individual/social circumstances of life.[dubious – discuss][citation needed] According to Masson's judgement this has been a neglect of reality giving priority to scientific research[citation needed]; patients wanted to get out but they have been left there, their "cases" having been studied.[citation needed]"
I'm going to look for a citation, maybe there is one.
:Austerlitz -- 88.72.27.48 (talk) 19:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation needed, yes.

message: the narrative makes no sense. 
10. Values experienced directly by the organism, and in some instances are values introjected or taken over from others, but perceived in distorted fashion, as if they had been experienced directly. 
I found this: http://www.btinternet.com/~p.g.h/counselling_training_rogers_propositions.htm which has a clearer fuller description:
X.                   The values attached to experiences, and the values that are a part of the self-structure, in some instances, are values experienced directly by the organism, and in some instances are values introjected or taken over from others, but perceived in distorted fashion, as if they had been experienced directly.
189.216.221.138 (talk) 19:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point X of 19 points is incomprehensible 

message: Is this to say that this is a digested version, rather than the real thing?  I think that if an editor is going give it his/her own spin, (s)he might as well use prose.
I believe that it can be quoted, and I think it is important that Rogers did not need to modify the propositions, but did derive more from them to modify his nature of therapeutic change.  The reason for this is simple: the proposition was constructed from the work of others.--John Bessa (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   19 propositions incomprehensible ?? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Carl Rogers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141123124138/http://www.redwoods.edu:80/instruct/jjohnston/English1A/readings/rhetoricandthinking/communicationitsblockingitsfacilitation.htm to http://www.redwoods.edu/instruct/jjohnston/English1A/readings/rhetoricandthinking/communicationitsblockingitsfacilitation.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110425165605/http://arp.unipi.it:80/dettaglioar.php?ide=128209 to http://arp.unipi.it/dettaglioar.php?ide=128209
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The external links section of this article appeared to be a WP:LINKFARM, and needed to be reduced to a minimum, per WP:ELMINOFFICIAL. As a temporary measure, I have removed the section. If there is a desire by other editors to restore the section, we can discuss here which link(s) would be appropriate. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 03:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links section too long