Talk:Currency detector

message: There are two sub-articles which are both stub-length. We could probably merge the lot in here. Chris Cunningham 18:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page has too many different types of products covered on it.  "Currency detector" should by design be 2 different topics, "coin acceptor", and "bill acceptor".  Also, most of the people who frequent this page and could expand it are professionals working for the manufacturers of these things (I know I am). and we are bound by contract to maintain control over intellectual property and copyrights.  I can say that the technologies are completely different, even as to how they transport currency, but I'm not allowed to go any further than that.  To merge all this together, while it might make a larger article, misrepresents the underlying technologies involved.  What's it going to be?  word count, or accuracy? -m--76.161.193.126 (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Without something more than nebulous comments about how these devices are totally different on an IP basis, there's no reason to split them again. There's no way for readers to verify that your comment is correct, and thus it would be inappropriate to act on it without further evidence. Chris Cunningham (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merges 

message: The types of counterfeit detectors listed under this section are only one type. There are also ones independent of those in ATMs and vending machines that are used in banks and commercial operations as stand-alone machines. These may be combined with banknote counters or may be simple ultraviolet lights for checking a banknote's luminescence.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.98.203 (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banknote Acceptors 

message: With respect to the companies listed, what is the determining factor in listing a company as a "notable" manufacturer? Is there a certain sales volume (my company does $20,000,000 in sales a year) or a location requirement (a dozen countries) that gets a company listed or was it a quick google and the first few results were listed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.98.203 (talk) 20:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, but you probably should edit that article with caution and read WP:COI. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Well, that's what I'm saying. I didn't add any of the "notable" companies... and personally I think it's non-neutral to list them. However, I didn't remove them because I accept that I'm biased, as I am the president of one of their competitors. Ryanfickes (talk) 20:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Companies 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Currency detector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150505025421/http://www.moneyfactory.gov/faqlibrary.html to http://www.moneyfactory.gov/faqlibrary.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130530042736/http://www.transtekinc.com/Application_Articles/ATM.pdf to http://www.transtekinc.com/Application_Articles/ATM.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150208044357/http://www.secretservice.gov/KnowYourMoneyApril08.pdf to http://www.secretservice.gov/KnowYourMoneyApril08.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified