lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brian Castro

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Brian Castro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814204519/http://www.giramondopublishing.com/imprint_titles/shanghai_dancing/brian_castro.html to http://www.giramondopublishing.com/imprint_titles/shanghai_dancing/brian_castro.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814204519/http://www.giramondopublishing.com/imprint_titles/shanghai_dancing/brian_castro.html to http://www.giramondopublishing.com/imprint_titles/shanghai_dancing/brian_castro.html
*Added  tag to http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/4/24/lifebookshelf/17441369&sec=lifebookshelf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080722225859/http://www.ozarts.com.au/artists/brian_castro to http://www.ozarts.com.au/artists/brian_castro
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Perry Middlemiss (talk) 08:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Max Romeo

message: Can I proffer that the 'Concerts' section does not represent typical encyclopedic matter, and belongs elsewhere.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I had moved the concert section from its own article because it was so small and this too was also a small article so it did not need its own article.  But now that I think about it I do not think it belongs here either, so the information should be removed. Aspects (talk) 21:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Section

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/max-romeo-mn0000334101/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Len

message: Am I the only one who finds it strange that a rock group should be parked at Len where an disambiguation page belongs? Williamborg 03:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed—I moved it and fixed the incoming links. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I find it strange that of what is listed on the page page, only one uses the all-cap acronym "LEN" and yet, the all-cap page has been redirected from Ligue Européenne de Natation to Len. Hooperswim (talk) 18:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fixed now. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

message: len 103.62.153.171 (talk) 06:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi, I am Literally Joking about this Frietzel.
Talk:Calling Elvis

message: Anderson designed the puppets or at least gave full permission to all puppets but did not directed the video
Steve Barron directed the video  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:191:5FA0:ED4B:665F:2321:AE34 (talk) 11:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Director of the video not ANDERSON
Talk:Nationwide Urban Runoff Program

message: very uninformational
:Do you have any specific ideas on how we could improve the article?--Commander Keane 10:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

message: The correct title of the project is the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program.  It was led by US EPA with the cooperation of various state & local agencies, universities, etc.  Unfortunately the original EPA publication is out of print, but it's available (at a price!) from NTIS.  Many other stormwater-related reports and publications quote large sections from it as well.
I have a copy of the report somewhere.  I will attempt to compile some additional information and improve the summary on this page.  Also the separate page tited "NURP" will be merged here.  Moreau1 (talk) 03:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added selected findings (quotations) from Executive Summary Report. The NURP documents are now available for download from EPA site (links provided in references). Broken and redundant external links were deleted. Moreau1 (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Added section headings, merged text from "NURP" page, revised description of "NURP Ponds" section, added more description of study & findings. Moreau1 (talk) 05:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in Title
Talk:Jedi Quest

message: Theres a hardcover that is just Jedi Quest that either is before Jedi Quest: The Way of the Apprentice or is the series.  I don't really know what's going onI  haven't read it.  I just know it's there.  I'm no good with summaries and all that, so I'll let someone else handle that.  I thought I'd just throw that out there.  --Skope 03:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The other one is the Path of Truth, why isn't that on the page? Jedi6-(need help?) 04:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot to include that.  Path of truth is the one I was referring to.  In the source I looked at, it didn't include that.  "Path of Truth" is the subtitle I guess.  Whoops. --Skope 01:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jedi Quest Hardcover
Talk:General Motors Motorama

message: The following user comment was removed from the article:
"Why no mention of the motorama show in Chicago. I have vivid memories of this show, mostly of the green Euclid heavy construction equipment on display, which included the dual engined buldozer being introduced at that time.75.3.39.92 16:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  User comment in article
Talk:Reang Democratic Party

message: Note:  Project Banner with Mizoram workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Mizoram or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 01:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Mizoram Addition
Talk:Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar)

message: Founded
1st May 1994 94.207.53.122 (talk) 23:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded 1st May 1994 

message: @Chennai Super Kings Lover please dont edit war. You will need to find a source that explicitly states the ideology. Inference is not enough. Please see WP:SYNTH. @Chomskywala is right to remove your edit. Venkat TL (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that you have again added. Please provide quotes from the source that supports your edits. Venkat TL (talk) 11:09, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology 

message: Sir please edit ideology pro-khalistan cut from ideology plz sir thanks Jatteditormind (talk) 11:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology 

message: @Srijanx22 A large segment of the content removed was Simrinjeet Singhs Manns's statements following the election. I disagree that they are POVs from the editor as they are direct quotes from statements he has made. What are the reasons you believe they are insufficient for inclusion in this section? Chomskywala (talk) 18:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electoral Success
Talk:Sutherland Cup

message: There is a dispute as to the true 1971-1972 Cup Winner.The Schreiber Northstars, winners of the NWOJHL League defeated the Soo Indians of the Northern League. The Markham Waxers refused to play the winners and many consider Schreiber, a town of 1700 people, the true champion or co-champion at the least. The provincial government recognized The Schreiber team by awarding them recognition awards as Provincial Champions. It would be fitting for the OHA to recognize the contribution of Northern Ontario teams.  Contact me at kspadoni(at)shaw(dot)ca for details.  Thank you.
:Please sign your comments.  That is an interesting tidbit you have left us.  I've often wondered about HNO and NOHA champions and how they never competed against the OHA Sutherland Cup champions.  I am trying to find history on the Thunder Bay Jr. A and Jr. B leagues as well as the NOHA Jr. B leagues... if you have the time, please write me on my talk page or here and maybe consider joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey if you are interested... we need more Ontario input... so far it is me and like 3 other guys.  One guy won't touch below Major Jr. and the other two kinda disappear for long lengths of time...
:I would appreciate your help... for your region, check these out:  Superior International Junior Hockey League, Thunder Bay Junior B Hockey League, North of Superior Junior B Hockey League, Hockey Northwestern Ontario... and the various team pages that come with these...  DMighton 04:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1971-1972
Talk:Yigal Carmon

message: The sentence: 
During his time in Military Intelligence, he became a senior officer of its Unit 504, a small secret unit dedicated to human intelligence which was particularly active in Lebanon[1] and administers Facility 1391, a prison described by critics as "Israel's Guantanamo". 
What does this mean?  The tenses shift mid-sentence.  Does it mean that he currently administers this prison?  What's the connection to the subject?
Adam Holland 04:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ungrammatical sentence: ambiguous meaning 

message: did not mention Carmon.  Elizmr 22:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed haaretz ref 

message: See here: The Big Lie: Find Out Why Many Muslims Think Bin Laden Is Innocent. The accusation is bogus so I've removed it per BLP. <<-armon->> 13:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That article doesn't mention Carmon, Whitaker, or Gallup polls.  Did you provide the wrong link by mistake?  The Whitaker criticism was accurately explained and is in no way a violation of BLP. csloat 18:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does. "It turns out an overwhelming majority of people in the Muslim world, according to a Gallup poll, do not believe the attacks of Sept. 11 were orchestrated by Osama bin Laden, or by Arabs, or by Muslims. Many believe, instead, that the whole thing was a conspiracy orchestrated by Jews. " Isarig 19:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed - guess I should read rather than trusting "find on page."  I won't revert.  But Whitaker does claim, in more than one place, that Gallup has confirmed that Carmon's representation of the findings were false. csloat 19:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which suggests that Whitaker is not a reliable source. <<-armon->> 23:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or that they are talking about different Gallup polls.  I seriously doubt Whitaker simply made this comment up. csloat 00:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The elaborated quotes seems to be part of broader discussion between the two.  I suggest that we keep the basics of it, and allow the reader to follow the link to the Guardian.  --Smith's Rottweiler (talk) 20:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallup poll "criticism"
Talk:Wrecking Crew '98

message: No problemo. --Arima 04:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshots Added 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illinois/Illinois recent changes

message: Possible to subdivide these lists? Less than half of my edits seem to take, it locks up my browser when it doesn'tPreciousRoi (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this page is way too damn big. I wonder if the numbered lists are making it go crazy. I can't get anything to commit. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried removing the pound signs, but that didn't fix it. I removed the Talk pages and then it allowed the page to be saved. I used to update this with AWB, and the pound signs were part of the way AWB output the lists. If this page is used as a watchlist Talk pages will not register now. I'm not sure I even have AWB on my computer anymore, so maybe someone else could try to update it. --Dual Freq (talk) 02:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have AWB and use of it, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean; is it necessary for this page to use numbered lists for all the sublists? --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 04:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I think what I did was used AWB to make a list of :Category:WikiProject Illinois articles then sorted and saved that list. The raw output of AWB that was saved had pound signs in it and thats where they came from. I don't believe they had any affect on the page, since even after I removed them it still didn't allow the page to be saved. --Dual Freq (talk) 11:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Subdivisions?
Talk:Eden, North Carolina

message: Who are all these famous people who have red links? I suppose we should delete them. Any thoughts? Paul, in Saudi (talk) 08:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, these "Notable residents" sections shouldn't be lists. Rather they should be prose describing the resident's life in the town/city, and supported by sources, of course. I would have no problem eliminating these, especially since no references for any are given. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 15:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Paul, in Saudi (talk) 16:40, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many red links
Talk:Mantyke

message: What pics did you see of Tamanta's back? I've only seen Tamanta from the front! Can someone post a pic showing Tamanta's back?
From: HOL, 4:51PM, May 16, 2006—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.197.220.129 (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not the place for it, however, if you look at the sprites of it from behind( i.e. when you are using it in battle) you can see the markings. --WikidSmaht (talk) 20:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How do you know what's on Tamanta's back?

message: Several Wiki articles have the "new" English names of Pokémon, as revealed at the Toy Fair in NYC (most sources being Serebii) (eg. Nettle is now Turtwig on Wiki). Serebii also says that the fair confirmed all of the previously revealed names they had, Mantyke being one of them. So, with it being from the same source, why is this (along with a few others) name not yet changed? --NukeMTV 02:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the case of this article, technical restrictions.  "Mantyke" was made to redirect to "Tamanta" back when the name was first reported; you can't move a page to an existing name and in order to keep the article's history et cetera, we'll need an admin to delete the redirect then move the page normally.—ウルタプ 03:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I seemed to be able to change it just fine... Right here. I changed it back just in case someone wanted to bitch at me, but its possible. Just revert the Mantyke article back to this edit, and redirect the entire Tamanta page to Mantyke. --NukeMTV 19:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can change it manually, of course (via cut-and-paste), but that leaves all the page history here at Tamanta, which is not a good thing.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 21:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Match 'n' Catch game confirmed "Mantyke" as its US name. So... somebody move this to Mantyke! - Mitsumasa 16:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you listening? We're waiting for an admin.—ウルタプ 17:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can put in the  template in cases like this for a (somewhat) quick response. I've done so. ' 17:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New "Mantyke" information
Talk:James H. Kindelberger

message: I'm not sure that the names of Kindelberger's children and grandchildren are relevant.  Am I the only one who thinks so?  I would have hoped that whoever knows the names of his children would also know something about his life and could contribute something more significant to the article. Dabarkey 04:18, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. That's completely irrelavant information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.101.71.109 (talk) 09:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:State highway

message: Please comment on SPUI's continual removal of "original research". --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)  04:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Capitalization is a stylistic thing, not nearly as cut-and-dried as your text claims. Such a statement is true about anything. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 05:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd rather that paragraph wasn't in the article, but I don't care enough to do the deleting myself.  It's pretty much devoid of information - it's a kind of truisism, could be said about any phrase. "Some people write 'Flying Spaghetti Monster' others write 'Flying spaghetti monster'... "  Toiyabe 15:25, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, drop the paragraph per Toiyabe. FWIW, I prefer to think of it as "you and I are people (general), but your name is John (specific)." —Rob (talk) 19:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research?

message: This article doesn't distinguish enough what is meant by state. Countries *are* states (independant ones, often nation-states), so the whole "The usage of the terms "state highway", "state route", etc. may vary from country to country or even from state to state." sentence is rather nonsensical.
Generally a poor introduction to the concept of state highways. A more general term may be useful, that includes all sub-national (or regional) route numbering schemes.
zoney  ♣ talk 17:08, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ive added a bit on it becuase "state"="country" is the definition used for state highways in New Zealand. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 23:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with such a split and merge - numbered highways designated by sub-national governments? --SPUI (T - C) 14:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Alternately it could just be merged into numbered highway. --SPUI (T - C) 14:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  State 

message: Worldwild scope could be achieved if this article were split into State highway (U.S.) and a more general state highway article with appropriate disambiguation.  Rlquall 21:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldwide scope
Talk:Sivagiri, Kerala

message: The tag has been placed because the entire article seems to be written like a blog post. It provides no citations (as of May 2015) and sounds promotional. Please read WP:NOTSOAPBOX and improve the article's tone. BudChrSch (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Tone' Tag 

message: Hi folks, I am wondering if it would be easier to find this page if it was restructured and renamed to just focus on the mandir? Or should that be created as a separate page? As it is the page focuses on an area and the mandir information is not easy to find unless you are already looking at this page. Please let me know your thoughts!  Hemmingweigh (talk) 20:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temple
Talk:The Maids

message: To be split into separate articles for The Maids (play) and The Maids (film), please. Her Pegship 04:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. Flapdragon 11:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Until there's more substantial material on both, I think it would be better not to split. I agree that the disambig you describe will have to happen eventually, but while there's so little, any browser won't feel overwhelmed by their crowding together. DionysosProteus 04:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm going to flesh out the information on the play, so I've implemented the suggested split. DionysosProteus (talk) 23:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to split

message: In my copy of The Maids, a 1962 printing by Evergreen/Grove Press collected with Deathwatch a preface by Satre, it mentions that Genet had originally intended to cast the play with a cast of boys, but that Louis Jouvet convinced him to use actual females instead.  Is this worth noting in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.63.201.235 (talk) 04:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male Actors
Talk:Belt buckle

message: I would say No. Belt Buckles are not only an article of clothing, they are (sadly) a status symbol in the Southern United States, and because of the many designs, this article of clothing is deserving of its own article. If anything, this article needs to be expanded. --Zpb52 04:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. i'll try to expand this a bit in the next few dtas.Joeyramoney 22:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Belt (clothing)]]

message: The Buckle entry is much more detailed and informative with regards to this topic. I suggest someone add that article to the Fashion WikiProject and add any relevant information from this stub to that article. Anyhoo...
- beautypersoni (talk) 04:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Buckle]]

message: It might be necessary to shorten or remove the references to JW Cooper. It reads like advertising copy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Idbdl2009 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising? 

message: I cannot figure out what a box-out buckle is.  The current revision has no physical description of the style, and all I can find in Google searches is copies of this text.  If anyone has any idea what this is intended to refer to, please add clarification.  Otherwise, perhaps it should be removed. -Verdatum (talk) 22:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like fluffery. I'm tempted to take it out.Kortoso  (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's nonsense. No description of "box out buckle." No picture. Lofty claims about how they "dominate production" (with no reference). They are "less functional but more fashionable." Than what? According to whom? The whole section is unsupported and opaque. I am deleting it. 172.58.221.23 (talk) 04:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  box-out "buckle" 