lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aequian language

message: "There are no records about the language spoken by the Aequi before the Roman conquest; however, since the Marsi, who lived farther east, spoke in the 3rd century BC a dialect closely akin to Latin, and since the Hernici, their neighbours to the south-west, did the same, it is most likely that all three tribes belonged to the Latian group. From the presence of the "q" letter in their name and the supposed relation between its shorter and its longer form (note that the "i" in the word Aequiculus is long -Virgil, Aen. vii. 744 - which seems to connect it with the locative of aequum ("a plain", so that it would mean "dwellers in the plain", although in the historical period they certainly lived mainly in the hills), they could be grouped with the so-called "q" or the "p" dialects: the former includes Latin, which preserved an original q, while the latter include the dialect of Velitrae, commonly called Volscian (the Volsci were the constant allies of the Aequi), on the other hand, in which, as in the Iguvine and Samnite dialects, an original "q" is changed into "p". There is no decisive evidence to show whether the "q" in Latin aequus represents an Indo-European "q" as in Latin quis, Umbro-Volsc. pis, or an Indo-European "k + u" as in equus, Umb. ekvo-. The derivative adjective Aequicus might be taken to range them with the Volsci rather than the Sabini, but it is not clear that this adjective was ever used as a real ethnonym; the name of the tribe is always Aequi, or Aequicoli."
This section is from Britannica 1911 and was in the Aequi article. As long as this language article exists, it does not belong there. There is a question of how valid this material now is. Frankly I would guess, not too. However I do not wish to toss anything away without checking it out. Even in 1911 it would have been questionable. However in those days they had some theories that went out the window in the late 20th century. They believed, for example, and I was originally trained to believe, that Celtic and Latin were closely related and you could insert Celtic etymologies into Italic ones. Not so. So, all this business about the lack of records and the p and q look suspiciously like the old Celtic-Italic game (along with phlogiston and the force of gravity). I wouldn't trust it unless you can find a modern linguist who espouses it.Dave (talk) 09:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: To be considered for inclusion

message: The first ALBSI PATRE should obviously be interpreted as Albensi patri not Albano patri. Cf. Festus sv. albesia and note in 1700 Dacier's editon. There were 2 Albae, one in Latium and the other on the Fucinus in Marsian territory (Alba Fucens) and the people from the 1st were named Albani, from the 2nd Albenses.
The other is pure Latin, no trace of any Aequian...Aldrasto11 (talk) 13:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inscriptions
Talk:Expression pedal

message: I have proposed that Swell box be merged into this article. This article is more complete and seems to contain (due to the nature of the material) most of the information from Swell box. Unless someone can provide detailed construction information on swell boxes and their varying mechanisms throughout history, I don't see much reason to keep this page separate from Expression pedal. —Cor anglais 16 (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. MDCollins (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger executed. —Cor anglais 16 (talk) 18:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd propose to change the lemma to Swell box then, since it is more comprehensive. -andy 78.51.106.27 (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Swell box]] merger 

message: The German Wikipedia article Schwellwerk contains detailed information about the swell box that if translated may very well go in its own article, essentially undoing the merge from eight years ago. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split back 

message: As someone who has played harmoniums professionally, I would like to say that the pedalling is not nearly as tiring as playing the keys and using the expression knee paddles.  A well maintained pump organ requires little effort.  Secondly, you can get a pretty respectable range of volume by changing the pumping rate (however the pitch does shift a little which can be undesirable in a ensemble environment).  The instrument in my lounge can go from a p to an f on a single stop.  --Jaded-view (talk) 04:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Been there, done that. You have more stamina than I do. In any case, what bearing should all this have on the article? Rivertorch (talk) 06:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I say that the line in question ("not to mention that the organist would eventually tire from pumping"), aside from its split infinitive, is subjective and unencyclopedic; hence, I think it's unnecessary. I vote that we remove the line. —Cor anglais 16 21:27, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How about changing would to might or often would? That way, we would acknowledge its being an issue without suggesting it's universal to all pump organists. (I'm neutral on this split infinitive. Moving the adverb back one word would work well—and might well work! ;-) ) Rivertorch (talk) 05:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I like that suggestion. —Cor anglais 16 22:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pedal organ observations inaccurate 

message: I’ve been reading Charles Burney’s ‘Present State of Music in Germany’ (1773) where he observes that swell is unknown in German organs, though common in British. What is he referring to, if not the swell pedal? 220.240.65.150 (talk) 08:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swell earlier?
Talk:Oakwood tube station

message: The trivia stating that Oakwood is the highest station on the Piccadilly line is incorrect.  Google Earth shows Cockfosters Station to be at 100m above sea level. DavidUri 12:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure where Google Earth gets its altitutde data, but a check at the Ordnance Survey's Get-a-map site shows that Cockfosters station is between the 95m and 100m contour lines so the Trivia statement is clearly wrong. The statement was originally added on 2 May 2006 by User:IsarSteve and I have queried the source and the odd statement about the Urals mountain on his talkpage. --DavidCane 15:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The information has two sources.. I personally remember seeing the bronze plaque in the 1970s & the details also appear  in the Piccadilly Line Managements (East Area) 1993 publication: Piccadilly Line Extension The Diamond Anniversary. It may not be the highest point on the Piccadilly Line, but in 1933  London Transport thought it was!!! --IsarSteve 07:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the response. Both a strange statement to want to commemorate on a plaque and odd that they would apparently get it wrong. I wonder what promoted the decision to erect the plaque - perhaps a visit from a Soviet delegation to see the new extension. --DavidCane 00:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Highest station claim

message: Epping, Theydon Bois, Cockfosters, High Barnet and Chesham are all further North than Oakwood.
See http://homepages.tesco.net/houseofsteel/geoff-files/sillymaps/tubegeo.jpg for evidence
Unless of course you meant second most northerly Piccadilly station  —Preceding unsigned comment added by --AsparagusTips (talk) 14:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Second most northerly?
Talk:Ticket

message: Strong support; I can't imagine why this hasn't already been done. Acdixon 14:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've split the article, but the resulting pages are still pretty horrible and need expansion and/or cleanup. Acdixon 19:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting article

message: I've added some more entries, but Wikipedia appears not to have entries for Bus ticket or Rail ticket (a.k.a. Railway ticket or Train ticket). TiffaF 06:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rail ticket?, Bus ticket?
Talk:Hoole

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) Snowy 1973 (talk) 00:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: I've done a general tidy up of this article and added in some references. At some point I'll add a bit more information, particularly about schools in the area. Jules1975 14:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2007
Talk:Tenecteplase

message: This article is a bit low on content, methinks. JFW | T@lk 14:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I AM TRYING TO FIND INFORMATION ABOUT MONITORING AFTER THIS DRUG IS GIVEN.I WAS TAUGHT A CERTAIN WAY BUT WAS TOLD DIFFERENTLY A FEW DAYS AGO..MY QUESTIONS ARE DO YOU KEEP THE PT FLAT, FOLEY AND PREVENT LITTLE MOVEMENT TO AVOID BLEEDING OR DO YOU SIT PT UP AND LET THEM MOVE FREELY..THANK YOU IN ADVANCE...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.238.162.225 (talk) 12:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MONITORING AFTER DRUG HAS BEEN GIVEN? 

message: I NEEd to know for tax reasons  as I had a injection at the medical centre in Dubai Uae  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.175.243.206 (talk) 10:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the PRICE PER INJECTION
Talk:Worms (2007 video game)

message: Is that really the release date? I hope so! --Cngodles 21:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date 

message: I was reading about how they were having trouble squeezing this release within the size limits, but apparently yesterday or the day before they upped the size limit from 50MB to 150MB. I wonder if Worms is going to be a 50MB or a 150MB release. I'm betting 50MB. --Cngodles 15:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: I'd like to see someone figure out the formula for determining your score on the leaderboard. I've been playing this game alot, and last night, I was ranked #101 overall. --Cngodles 14:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking Formula
Talk:Biperiden

message: Potent, selective M1 receptor antagonist (Ki values are 0.48, 2.4, 3.9, 6.3 and 6.3 nM for M1, M4, M3, M2 and M5 receptors respectively).
http://www.abcam.com/Biperiden-hydrochloride-ab141781.pdf
https://www.scbt.com/scbt/product/biperiden-hydrochloride-1235-82-1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.241.248.66 (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  receptors binding 

message: Citation needed for biperiden's usage in treating Tourette syndrome.
All I could find was a case report of treating extrapyramidal symptoms caused by dopamine antagonists in a Tourette syndrome patient.
This one showed resolution of symptoms:
https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1g331
I also found a case study of biperiden in a patient with schizophrenia and Tardive Tourette-like syndrome induced by antipsychotics, in which it appeared ineffective.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.1992.tb00821.x
I could not find any source regarding the treatment of TS-proper with biperiden. Sappygang (talk) 12:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourette syndrome treatment 

message: "Biperiden is no longer marketed in the United States." Is this statement correct? if so, the reason? Thank you for your kind attention. ThomasYehYeh (talk) 13:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anybody help clarify following
Talk:Research Machines 380Z

message: Can 380Z/480Z software be emulated on the PC? Drutt 14:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Was that it's official name? The box itself just says Research Machines 380Z on the front. Drutt 20:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have moved this article to Research Machines 380Z, being the official name of the machine. RML 380Z and RM 380Z redirect here. Sidefall 15:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

message: This was a long time ago... memory might not be 100% correct. I understood the bus was S100, not a ribbon cable. The machine powered up to a screen full of numbers (probably in hex). I was told at the time this was some sort of memory dump. J100 and J103 were typed to get the thing into Basic - one never knew which one would work. I was always told J stood for 'jump to'. I always remember the dual 8" that we had having 400K capacity each, but could be wrong. That much space seemed enormous at the time! The discs were turned by a mains synchronous motor via belt. That always struck me as not exactly crystal controlled. IIRC most of the machines we used had 1k 'graphics', one had a lot more, perhaps 16k. 'Graphics' for the 1k machines really meant what is now known as arial-alt, ie a font where each character consists of 6 blocks in many combinations. Although this enabled graphics of a sort using text, there were 2 issues with that. 1st not all combinations were present in the font! 2nd I remember it being unworkable to calculate each block & translating that into the font - but my programming skills were hardly good at the time. Lastly I remember getting it to run at 4x the speed by peeking & poking basic to change the word commands to 1 or 2 letter words. I made 2 versions of this, one for max speed & the other for compatibility with existing programs - but it was still necessary to go through the basic program looking for variable names that would now be misinterpreted as commands by the machine. The BBC B used this same approach to shrink & speed up basic programs.
82.30.111.65 (talk) 00:51, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus
Category talk:Hugo Award-winning editors

message: This may need subcategories, since James & Mendlesohn won in a different category than the rest. Pleasantville 14:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure the total number of entries is so large that this needs to be divided into subcategories. Avt tor 16:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Marko Kitti

message: This article would benefit greatly from links to reviews of the author's books or interviews with him. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 14:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found these -  - but not knowing Finnish, not much use. But there's a list of  fluent Finnish editors here. Tearlach 19:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and reviews
Talk:People's Initiative

message: Do we need four separate articles?  Maybe we should combine People's Initiative, Constitutional Convention (Philippines), and Constituent Assembly (Philippines), into Constitutional reform in the Philippines. --Bruce Hall (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: People's initiatives are actually not something unique to the Philippines, but to the United States of America... long before the Philippines PI. This article is only a main subsection of the article that should be developed.2600:1011:B111:4C1D:582A:A1E7:41B3:F910 (talk) 17:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You may bw referring to popular initiative. Howard the Duck (talk) 10:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broaden the Scope of the Article 

message: Is it possible making decision from the Supreme Court? 152.32.110.145 (talk) 12:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABS-CBN People's Initiative
Talk:General glut

message: I moved this material out the Socialist economics article as too specialist. BobFromBrockley 14:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: moved from Socialist economics

message: Cut from after "Imperialism" (until source provided) : Rod57 (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research ? 

message: "The problem is that, as labor becomes specialized, if people want a higher standard of living, they must produce more. However, producing more lowers prices and leads to the need to produce yet more in response."
What economist of any significance ever held this theory? Cite needed. GeneCallahan (talk) 18:28, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Is Vulgar "General Glut" Theorizing 

message: Spoiler alert!:  One of the big takeaways at the end of the novel was (drumroll please) that since all of the countries' means of production had long since outstripped the citizenry's ability to consume it all, the most effective way to use up the surplus (both output AND population) was to engage in unending war, where the products of output could be destroyed, and so, the nations of the earth colluded to engage in just enough constant war to keep the world economy rolling along. 98.201.8.131 (talk) 08:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This may have been at the heart of the dystopian novel 1984
Talk:Philip James Bailey

message: As much as I like the sound of this poet (who I don't know), this article isn't particularly objective. Also, there are no links to his online work and very little biographical information. I (and I am sure most other readers) would be quite happy to be more enlightened. I hope someone fixes this and soon.
TriniKnight 14:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objectivity
Talk:Heraion of Samos

message: The cited source doesn't actually state this; I wonder why? Maybe there's a small chance that the only source text of the extant manuscripts contained a lacuna?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 03:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   Pausanias ... did not visit Samos.
Talk:Heraion of Perachora

message: I don't normally do wikiproject quality ratings, but I was quite appalled at seeing this article rated as "start". Seriously, what are people thinking? This article is absolute top quality. Calling this "start class" is an insult to its creator.
I've assessed it for the B class requirements and given it a pass on all. I'm aware that the lack of inline citations may seem like a problem to some, but if you look at the kind of statements (very simple factual descriptions, almost throughout), and the titles of the references listed (very specific excavation reports), it becomes immediately clear what corresponds to what. 
Obviously, it meets all other criteria with flying colors. In fact I've gone straight beyond "B" and called it "A", because I really don't see much that could be improved. A criteria: 
# well-written, reasonably clear and complete: yes, with evident expert competence; 
# length and structure: obviously; 
# references: top quality (with the only drawback the lack of inline citations); 
# illustrations: marvellous.
Disclosure: I made one minor contribution to this article myself, by providing the map for it, which was really the only thing I found missing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: More often than not the WikiProject ratings aren't updated after the tag is first put on the page, unless someone specifically asks them to be, or the article goes through peer review. —Joseph RoeTk•Cb, 08:46, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Or at least that's how it is for archaeology. —Joseph RoeTk•Cb, 08:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rated
Talk:Toshiko Tamura

message: I'll note that part of her pen name matches her husband's and presumably was not only a pseudonym. Arlo James Barnes 09:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  family name
Talk:Office of Foreign Assets Control

message: Anybody know the background of the "Specially Designated Global Terrorist" designation? TIA.
LDH 14:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "specially designated nationals list" link links back to the same article. I wouldn't like to remove it as I'd like to see a full article, but I don't know anything about it (which is in a sense why I'd like to see the article!)
Unsigned  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.106.90.9 (talk) 02:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link 

message: This seems like an important fact to include:
* "11/09/2009: OFAC has released its Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines  as a final rule." http://www.treasury.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/actions/20091109.shtml
Pnm (talk) 01:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I think it’s important to show the financial industry several places to get a compliance certificate or simple OFAC search.
--EditUniv1 (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Information 

message: A minor point, but I don't know if the history of the office should speak of retaliation for "the harassment of American sailors" - I know that's taken from the official website, but I don't think a US government entity could be considered NPOV with regards to the war of 1812. I imagine others (eg. British) might dispute claims of harassment, or even claims that they were American sailors, not to mention the reasons for the sanctions. - Matthew238 (talk) 10:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but UK govt website would also be NPOV issues. Geraldshields11 (talk) 00:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV

message: I have this government office listed on my bank paper work if yet to receive anything I'm a clear gene match for about 20 years and I recieved beneficiary email 5 or more years ago. and made claims curious how long this process takes!? AKARKANDY123 (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  HYBRID spartan data set BIG C
Talk:Crothers Woods

message: * "Community Engagement & Capacity Building in Contested Public Spaces: A Case Study of the Crothers’ Woods Trail Management Strategy"~Skowronski et ipsa, April 2009, University of Toronto  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarXidad (talk • contribs) 16:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Resources

message: * find out details about Domtar Polyresin plant: when was it built? what products did it produce?
* what did the Sun Valley company do. What was dumped in the landfill?
* verify origin of name. Was it the Crothers' Machinery Company or a local landowner?
** plant was called Crothers Caterpillar. Named after George Crothers.
* add picture of mountain biking activity
**Basho 18:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To do list
Talk:Acrochordus granulatus

message: There are a couple of people who have uploaded images of this to Flickr. I have asked one of them. Richard001 (talk) 02:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 
Talk:Azacitidine

message: There is a mistake on the page. 5-Aza and 5-Aza-2-Deoxycytidine are not the same drugs. The first words give this impression. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.141.163.49 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 3 October 2007
:Fixed. Thank you for noticing. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in lead

message: Is the name "azacytidine" or "azacitidine"?
Perhaps someone could mention this in the main article. If it is similar to cytidine for instance (or perhaps not, I don't know myself, hence why I asked here on the talk page). 2A02:8388:1600:A880:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I had this question myself, since I'm about to be doing a bunch of work around this drug. It looks like both azacitidine and azacytidine are valid (among various others, see .) I personally prefer azacytidine, since the name is obviously derived from cytidine, but IIRC the naming policy is to stick with the original article title in the case of variants existing of the same name. -Kieran (talk) 19:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 