lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Doctors' Commons

message: The use of "civilian lawyer" in this article is archaic and specialised, and a way should really be found to phrase things in a way which is less likely to cause confusion. Merchbow 21:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The main article states that the society of Doctors' Commons was never formally dissolved, but perished with the death of its last Fellow, Herbert Jenner-Fust, in 1904. However, that name is linked to the article about Sir Herbert Jenner-Fust, who is stated to have lived from 1778 to 1852. Could two different people (possibly father and son) have been confused here? NRPanikker (talk) 16:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Fellow

message: What _would_ be useful is to explain why Doctors' Commons is mentioned in so many English novels with reference to special marriage licenses and the morals of married women, as in Susan Ferrier's Marriage.
4.249.3.151 (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  not really useful 

message: *In a book about the Great Fire of London I read that there was always or often a wind blowing at the corner of Doctors' Commons (in reality perhaps caused by the layout of the buildings), because once the Devil was riding on the wind when he came to Doctors' Commons and went inside, and "he found the company of the lawyers so congenial that he is still in there, and the wind is still waiting outside for him [to come out and ride away].". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A legend about the wind at Doctors' Commons
Talk:List of public domain tangos

message: for direct links to SADAIC to quickly verify the data, use Template:SADAIC like  where 1234 is the SADAIC number. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification
Talk:Deliverance ministry

message: I got rid of much obviously biased material, which was not NEUTRAL at ALL! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.190.24.217 (talk • contribs) 17:03, February 23, 2006 (UTC)
I edited a sentence in the "deliverance vs. exorcism" section to neutralize bias. Atietz2020 (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns regarding bias

message: The lede image seems inappropriate for this topic and should be removed in my opinion if a better one cannot be located. Nikolaih☎️📖 05:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: — Assignment last updated by Harold the Ghost (talk) 16:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Social Problems

message: This article feels inside-out to me, with Wikipedia treating the concept of deliverance as subordinate to the associated ministry rather than the reverse. What would others think about moving it to Deliverance (Christianity), reorganizing it to be about the concept (perhaps with a reference to and expanding on the pertinent phrase in the Lord's Prayer and its interpretation), and then setting coverage of deliverance ministry within that? Largoplazo (talk) 13:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm satisfied with the way it is.  Darlig 🎸 Talk to me 23:35, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invert the article?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Djr xi 2

message: Djr's response to question 9 would seem to nullify any potential concerns as to whether Djr's views would cause him to engage in deletion wheel warring over userboxes (unless we believe him to be a liar). I find the sudden opposition to him being given the mop on the grounds of his opinions bemusing. --Malthusian (talk) 22:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not a liar, I assume good faith. And if the concerns he responds to were my concern, then I would be satisfied. Neither do his opinions concern me. But I, like many of the opposers, are troubled by his record of civility. Please don't attribute general motives to a group of people. --Doc ask? 22:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Indeed, as far as I can see no-one raises wheel waring as their reason to oppose, I'm not sure what your point is? --Doc ask? 22:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I never implied I was referring to every single oppose voter. And no-one mentioned wheel warring by name, I simply assumed that those voting on the basis of his opinions on userboxes were voting on that basis - it seemed the most obvious and frankly I couldn't think of another reason why it would affect Djr's use of the mop. --Malthusian (talk) 22:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I asked the question just to clear things up... pretty much the worst way someone could potentially misuse admin powers would be to start wheel warring left right and centre. I'm now satisfied DJR wouldn't be doing that. Proto||type 09:29, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Would Djr wheel war over userboxes?
Talk:Paul J. Henderson

message: There are some serious accusations in this article without any citations.  Does anyone have information from reliable sources? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesTeterenko (talk • contribs) 22:14, February 23, 2006
: Stuff like that: don't just mark it as dubious, wipe it clean and request supporting evidence in the strongest possible terms. If anybody thinks they can support the allegations, then post them here for discussion. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 16:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious comments
Talk:Renaissance Learning

message: Can someone provide comments on why this article has "Start" status (see the box above)? I would like to help improve it, but I don't know what needs work. — Chris53516 (Talk) 05:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start status

message: *  was used as a source for the assertion that "Renaissance products have been tested". Anyone who had actually read the source would see that it says nothing whatsoever about the "testing" of Renaissance products. So I removed the bogus source.
*  is used as a source for the assertion that "Using the data from Accelerated Reader and Accelerated Reader 360, What Kids Are Reading highlights the books and nonfiction articles K–12 students read cover to cover each year." The cited source doesn't even mention What Kids Are Reading. So I removed the bogus source.
:I'm not sure why Xb2u7Zjzc32 is repeatedly inserting random sources into the article that are completely unrelated to the content for which they're supposed to provide reliable support. It makes no sense. 32.218.35.117 (talk) 02:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absurd sources 

message: My most recent edit to the article was a paid edit. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paid Edit 

message: This article is much too small for such criticisms. Of course nothing has changed since 2014, no one has added anything. Be bold and ask for article deletion, rather than these silly frivolous complaints that were made be people too lazy to do any of it themselves. Putting such templates up without any reach out or follow up is just vandalism with a sneer. It's easily foreseeable that no one is going to actually make substantial changes soon. If someone close to or within the company made edits, they certainly didn't add anything biased, uninformative or advertisement-like. And if the company does unpredictably well or poorly, the article will need informed contributers. Frankly I don't see any other way of significant contributions being made to the article. Cuvtixo (talk) 08:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed Templates concerning "advert, buzzword and COI"
Talk:Wyoming Seminary

message: Possible copyvio: The text of this page appears to be a copy of these two websites: http://www.wyomingseminary.org/general_info/g_history_intro.htm and http://www.wyomingseminary.org/general_info/g_history.htm.  Even if you have permission, this is ont the kind of encyclopedic summary that belongs on wikipedia.   Sheldrake 22:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest the history section be deleted and replaced with a new, shorter one rather than a cleanup. -- Chris Ccool2ax  contrib. 19:19, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Hey, I remember that auditorium... is it really that important? Also, i knw you're new, but to add a new topic to a talk page, hit the little + next to "edit".-- Chris Ccool2ax  contrib. 14:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: Reads like an ad.  The deification of the presidents is interesting, but not appropriate here.  Lots of Peacock terms.  Smallbones(smalltalk) 17:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a complete overhaul
Category talk:Superstitions

message: I was surprised to see that Jfdwolff, who has a background in science, wrote that a superstition is "provably wrong". Due to the fact that it is difficult to prove that a belief is never correct, I changed the wording to "irrational", which reflects the superstition article. You can't prove that superstitions are wrong, but you can show that superstitions have never been proven to be correct. Rhobite 22:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provably wrong
Talk:Gunrock

message: Just wondering what the rationale is for the cleanup tag? eae 22:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At least in the article, the newer mascot is written without a space. So why is this hidden away without a disambigation line on the page to which Gunrock takes you, or alternatively replacing that redirect with a disambiguation page?  Gene Nygaard 12:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. EAE (Holla!) 21:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hidden
Talk:North American blizzard of 1999

message: This is my first edit, other than minor spelling and grammar nitpicks.  Constructive criticism is appreciated. Cithara 22:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This storm also gave a real spanking to Southern Ontario to the point where ol' Mel Lastman called in the army to clean up Toronto.  I remember the houses were buried in snow, schools were closed for the first time in over a decade, etc.  It was something else.  I'll edit it to reflect the Canadian impact, but I need to get the data together first. Snickerdo 08:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Ontario impact
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/East Sea (disambiguation)

message: It has been over a week since the Mediation Committee accepted the case.  Has a mediator been assigned yet?  --Nlu (talk) 22:28, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we are unfortunately very very understaffed and very very busy; as soon as I get someone free, I'll have them on it. Let me send out an email asking for volunteers to take a second case. Essjay Talk • Contact 05:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Speak (film)

message: : In the book, Melinda wards off Andy using a scrap of glass from a broken mirror, whereas in the film, she fights him off by spraying him in the eyes with an aerosol can. -- Differences from the Novel
:: Having just watched the film I can recall she blinded him with cleaning fluid, knees/kicks him in the groin and then puts a fragment of mirror to his neck. Don't know what happens in the book  but the preceding bit about the film is wrong so I moved it here so that maybe someone familiar with the novel can add back in the correct version -- Horkana (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The glass part is the same in the book as it is in the film: she breaks a mirror and holds a piece of it to Andy's neck. The only difference is that in the movie, she also sprays something in his eyes. Andrea (talk) 16:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

message: From the character description: "Her biology teacher, Ms. Keen (Kimberly Kish) is too over speechless."
What does this sentence intend to communicate? Does anyone know? Xprivate eyex (talk) 12:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean? 

message: and interested parties: I finished copy edit on the article.  Here are my notes:
*Firstly, I did not copy edit the section "Differences from the novel" which looks to me like an unsourced list of trivia.  If someone would like to source it and establish the notability of the changes in the adaptation, give me a ping and I'll try to come back to copy edit it.
*The Plot section ends with  which sounds like commentary (unless this is stated in voiceover, etc.) and might be seen as original research.  Plot sections should generally just report what happened without any opinions.
*In the infobox, there's .  I changed this with the template , which I feel gives a more-standardized format.
If you have any questions or comments, please post them here.  Thanks! – Reidgreg (talk) 15:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2018 copy edit 

message: Sordino !
2001:171B:2273:1D71:8957:1A8F:508D:3717 (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her name is a pun
Talk:Ivo Shandor

message: Merge this with Ghostbusters.. duh Fresheneesz 22:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, definitely merge.  This information only appears in, and is only relevant to, the first Ghostbusters film.  It's barely even notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia in the first place.  -- 65.116.251.178 20:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: Are we sure about the spelling of the name? Tobin's Spirit Guide for the Ghostbusters role-playing game spells it Ivo Chandor. Gladrius 18:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: F.Y.I. - Ivo Shandor would be a Hungarian name, the Hungarian spelling with the same pronunciation would be Evo Sandor (with accent marks I don't have on this keyboard)
it could be Ivó Sándor too.
::I think with this we go with the spelling in the movie? Perhaps?
               STANTZ
            He's listed on the blueprints as I. 
                 Shandor.
                           SPENGLER
                     (exclaims)
                 Of course!
                     (the others turn and look at 
                      him)
                 IVO SHANDOR,  I saw his name in Tobin's 
                 Spirit Guide.  He started a secret 
                 society in 1920.''
From :[
Of course, this could be wrong for the movie too, in which case we need to change it to the right spelling.
IvoShandor 07:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: name
Talk:Catherine Wreford

message: I removed the cleanup tag, as it seems there is nothing to be cleaned up. Tim Messer 22:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag

message: maybe add that she is married to Jeff Goldblum 216.165.56.155 05:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Info

message: Could we actually check up on a topic before announcing that someone is no more important than an actress who played a tree in a school play?
I've added a bit of information from the links already in the article.
Strangelv 12:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: someone needs to clarify if they are together or not. I'm pretty sure they never married. Him hooking up with a twenty something gives the rest of us ladies with things for Mr. Goldblum a bit of hope however, ha ha! I wasn't sure how to mention it. She has barely anything listed about her, and I don't care frankly to expand it. Everything I have read says nothing about them being married, just engaged at one point.Missvain 03:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  no longer with jeff? 

message: Given that she was born in Canada, what evidence is there for her having American citizenship? --Saforrest 18:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  American? 

message: If we want to add more about her children I am a friend of Elliot in real life 206.45.158.20 (talk) 03:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:Wooper

message: I've added some pics. AtmanDave 18:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NONE of your pics were necessary additions into the article, and the info on shinies is not allowed.  See WP:FAIR. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'll try to stick to wiki guidelines in the future. Thanks. Also, I think the last edit with the trading card is justified. AtmanDave 22:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What about adding the sprite from CrysTal next to the video game section to show how Wooper is portrayed in the video games? AtmanDave 00:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No - talk to User:Ryulong,a nd he'll tell you why.  If you want the cliffsnotes version, then we need to have as FEW fair-use pics as possible per article (mainly because of the fact that Wikipedia has been rebelling against fair-use images for the past year).  Besides, the Crystal sprite for Wooper differs from both the male and female Diamond/Pearl sprites for Wooper, and thus can be confusing. -Jeske (v^_^v) 00:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Might I suggest joining the Pokémon Wikiproject? -Jeske (v^_^v) 02:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm
Talk:La Barra Brava

message: La Barra and the Screaming Eagles (another United Supporters group) are widely considered the most active and best supporters groups in MLS.
Um, no, they're not, Section 8 in Chicago is.--Milicz 22:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's also the spanish name for "Brave Fans" --201.253.242.106 02:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Barra Brava

message: Is this page even notable?  How is a fan club worthy of an encyclopedia entry, especially a MLS fan club?  MLS fans are so small in number in America and the fan clubs are an even smaller fraction of that group.130.127.3.249 (talk) 18:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevant/Notable/Important?

message: I've just disambiguated the United States link in the lead to United States men's national soccer team.  If they also support the women's team then a separate link should be added. Nick Number (talk) 21:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  women's national team?
Talk:Fingering

message: How come there is no mention of "fingering" as using the Finger protocol? Whaa? 22:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright I added Finger protocol. I have to admit i had a pifferent discription in my head when I went to this link.MilkStraw532 (talk) 19:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finger protocol 

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:fingering -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, hence the attempt to delete the page with a quick removal of terms. Fingering (viscous) Fingering (salt) are not "partial title matches" just natural disambiguation. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

text: * Discussion is now at Talk:Fingering (music). bd2412 T 19:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fingering"
Talk:List of Boeing CH-47 Chinook operators

message: It wasn't me who suggested this, don't know who did and why they didn't write anything here, but I think it would be too long and convoluted to put this into the main article. There's useful and comprehensive information here so let's keep it where it is. Iancaddy 23:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This is best left as a seperate article. --Nick Dowling 07:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The US has a couple of civilian operators in NASA and at least one commercial flyer in the West (Erickson Air Crane noted this to me), and than I saw it. 143.232.210.150 (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Civilian operators 
Talk:Ropecon

message: With 3500 attracted visitors the Ropecon isn't the biggest noncommercial con of its kind... that would be the annual NordCon in Hamburg, equally noncommercial, but has attracted about 7000 visitors in the year 2005.
http://www.nordcon.de/
Is that 7000 visitors distinct people, or some other figure? Killeri 14:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Melvin and Howard

message: Uh...shouldn't there be some mention of the fact that Melvin Dummar himself appears as a convenience store clerk in one scene?  [signed] FLORIDA BRYAN  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.153.106.193 (talk) 04:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dummar's own cameo in the film
Talk:September 29, 2003

message: We've already had several articles for individual days created, and each one has been deleted. This one should be no different. Maybe one day should have a Wikitimeline which can include them all. DJ Clayworth 23:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not right - we have >800 day pages from Jan-Aug 2003-2005. This is just extending the range into September. The timeline is a good idea and having individual pages is a step in that direction. Pcb21 Pete 23:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Skyshaper

message: The Metropolis website doesn't list any bonus tracks for this album.  Are they exclusive to just the US or European releases, or is there a special limited edition coming out (and if so, when?)? --Idont Havaname (Talk) 23:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a separate page on Metropolis for the limited edition. I added a link to it. --Shamilton 20:02, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited edition tracks? 

message: I don't get this. Is this just background noise or track sample extended for ambient stuff? Or is it meant to sound like the same beat for 15 minutes at a time...
:It's not the same beat for fifteen minutes at a time; you could try listening to some Philip Glass or Steve Reich and then come back and see if it makes more sense. Crossbottle (talk) 00:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subterfugue for 3 Absynths
Talk:American wine

message: I support the page move, but per your category argument, shouldn't it be "Wine in the United States" rather than "of"? That would allow expansion of the article to further discuss consumption of wine, import of wine, etc.. in addition to just United States wine production. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, or perhaps it should be a separate article, especially if/when this article actually becomes decent. It seems an article just focusing on wine produced here is important, as Template:Wine by country has all other countries follow that pattern. (The only other one that now doesn't use a demonym is Wine from the United Kingdom, perhaps because "British" can imply just Britain.) ɱ (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

text: Also will now match the Commonscat and other language versions. ɱ (talk) 20:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay. Well, all the other major wine producing countries followed the American Wine format, e.g. French Wine, Italian Wine, etc. with the present format as redirects. Not sure what format is best to follow. I understand the possibility of confusion that American could encompass more than just the US, but... hmmm. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but those countries simply don't have ambiguity with those names. That is why the UK and now US use a slightly different format, paralleled by Commons and other language versions. ɱ (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Wine in the United States
Talk:Gangster Disciples

message: Development 2603:6010:65F0:8990:8894:3084:E128:13BC (talk) 04:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Growth 

message: I started gdn and gave to larry hoover and i am a California gangster disciples i knew the only way to put it out there was by larry hoover and i am prince of gdn by means necessary twin got gdn started and my yah in folklore is last of folk nation gang and thanks for listening peace out. Twingda (talk) 09:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twin 

message: Jumpsuit is the leader of this gang 166.198.161.76 (talk) 19:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumpsuitpablo
Talk:Abusir

message: "Djedu" redirects here, but there is no explanation as to why. - furrykef (Talk at me) 05:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at the redirect's history: the creator says that it was the ancient name of Abusir.  Nyttend (talk) 19:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Djedu