lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Parkers

message: The info on dvd's has to be wrong, i can't find evidence of a release anywhere, even on tvshowsondvd.com!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.168.216 (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Its been deleted Ceddy 06 23:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am writing an article about all of the series which are in the same shared reality as this one through spin-offs and crossovers. I could use a little help expanding the article since it is currently extremely dense and a bit jumbled with some sentence structures being extremely repetitive. I would like to be able to put this article into article space soon. Any and all help in writing the article would be appreciated, even a comment or two on the talk page would help. Please give it a read through, also please do not comment here since I do not have all of the series on my watch list. - LA @ 17:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for help writing an article about the spin-offs and crossovers of this series 

message: Did the series ever air on Nick@Nite, if so in what time period was this? I see that someone added this info, and I just want to make sure it can be confirmed.Anthony hello123 (talk) 02:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syndication
Talk:The Importance of Being Earnest (2002 film)

message: What's the deal with "Ernest" in this article? Is it a typo or why is the article sometimes referring to "Ernest" and sometimes to "Earnest"? Or is this being explained in the movie or in the book? -- 67.100.62.36 (talk) 22:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the page for the play. Although the title is spelled Earnest, when the characters are named Earnest. It is a Wildean play on words. MarnetteD | Talk 23:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ernest or Earnest? 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 23:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Oil gusher

message: How did they cap an oil gusher?
:I was wondering that too. Or did they just have to wait until enough oil came out to relieve the pressure? --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 11:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the old days as I understand it they pretty much left it until it was manageable, but nowadays they have special machines to cap it while it's flowing.  Quite often they catch on fire and are dealt with by companies similar to the one started by Red Adair.  TastyCakes (talk) 16:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What was said above is not correct.  They had to try and fit a valve over teh gushing end.  Read this article http://www.wtblock.com/wtblockjr/harnessi.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.88.132 (talk) 02:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caps? 

message: The 2010 BP Oil Spill is not a "gusher" in the traditional sense (no more so than hundreds of other blowouts in the last 80 years or so).  If no serious objections raised here in the next 24 hours I plan to revert this addition. Casey (talk) 22:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed all mention of the 2010 BP Oil Spill from this "historical" page, and put reference to modern era blowouts in the lede.  (The BP spill has its own page, and any other details -- perhaps just a link -- should go on the Blowout (well drilling) page. Casey (talk) 02:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Once again I reverted additions of a modern blowout made most recently by User 72.66.216.73.  The BP spill is neither a gusher in the historical sense (as covered in this Wiki page) nor in any other sense using the common definition of oil blowing over a derrick.  Properly, no other modern-era blowouts have been covered on this page, and the current BP well should not be either.  This is being covered quite extensively on its own page, and any reference from a Wiki page dedicated to uncontrolled wells should be made from Blowout (well drilling). Casey (talk) 20:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BP Oil Spill
Talk:Sheryl Lee Ralph

message: article says 55, infobox says 56!  which is it?  2601:19C:5280:5BA7:88BF:F051:E306:B525 (talk) 08:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  birth year 

message: She was on Designing Women in the 80s. 47.185.193.162 (talk) 16:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designing Women
Talk:Minami-ku, Yokohama

message: I am currently in the process of added information to the English language page, based upon the Japanese language version. If anyone has any comments, please let me know. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.237.114.172 (talk) 02:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Process of Translating 

message: Please note that the above comment was from me - I forgot to log in. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by B Gallagher (talk • contribs) 21:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Above Comment 
Talk:Amy Bruckner

message: There is a link to Amy-Bruckner.net (a fansite) and that site is no longer in operation... is this a reason to remove the link?
I dont wanna remove anything unless someone concurrs with me. HeathersAngel 03:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of link to amy-bruckner.net

message: <Hallpriest9 (Talk | Archive) 22:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree on the whole birthday/age thing. If she was born in 1993, that would make her 14 now, which means she would have been like 11-12 in Phil of the Future.. and she looked older than that in the show. I don't wanna change it, because I don't want to engage in an edit war. Do you think we can find a reliable source to prove her birthdate? Also, I'll check the external links too. Don't forget, you can always make the change yourself if you're comfortable doing so. Rockerbaby 03:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the TV.com link. I also removed the NNDB link (it appears THEY deleted her record), and removed the AmyBruckner.net link (dead link). Thanks for bringing this to our attention! Rockerbaby 03:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had to remove the NNDB link again. With her birthday, just find one, or if necessary two, sources that have her birthdate. (Note the NNDB and IMDb aren't reliable sources.) Acalamari 01:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date and external links

message: Per a discussion with User:Acalamari, I have located two sources for Amy's birthday, and have changed it accordingly in the article:
* TV.com  -- http://www.tv.com/amy-bruckner/person/103574/summary.html
* IMdb -- http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1426904/
Rockerbaby 02:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you find a better one than the IMDb anywhere? If you don't know how to add sources I can add them into the article for you. Acalamari 03:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll keep looking, and will also <ref> the tv.com reference for now. When I find another source, I will note it here as well. Rockerbaby 03:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Found a press release from Disney! http://www.disneychannelmedianet.com/web/showpage/showpage.aspx?program_id=3112295&type=bruckner Rockerbaby 03:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work on finding sources. :) Acalamari 03:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for Amy's birthday
Talk:Nektar

message: I don't believe this band ought to be in the category of German bands.
They were originally four Englishmen who happened to meet in Hamburg.
I don't know how to get it moved to make them appear as an ENGLISH BAND.
:The above unsigned comment is from 2006. Nevertheless, another editor has already added the article to the English prog bands category. Having this article in both the English and German categories seems appropriate, since the band had roots in both countries. Taxman1913 (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if the members themselves were German.  The Beatles and Deep Purple both established themselves in Germany to begin with, but neither is a 'German band.'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.187.105 (talk) 09:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Roy Albrighton is dead
http://teamrock.com/news/2016-07-28/nektar-roye-albrighton-dead-67  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Breugelius (talk • contribs) 11:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead member

message: Could someone with more knowledge of Source coding make a timeline of the members? My knowledge of coding is not enough to make one from scratch, only to edit it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinclair 98 luis (talk • contribs) 16:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline needed!!
Talk:Beta reader

message: Um... how on Earth would you cite references or sources on an internet slang term used everywhere, but mostly on non-permenent pages? I mean, if you read fiction on just about any modern internet archive, or join or read just about any blog, journal, group or site dedicated to writing online, you will run across the term. Usually frequent. I'm actually asking this not out of annoyance, but - how do people usually cite this kind of thing, anyway? 
Although I did cite one print source that used it - Naomi Novik's first novel (as noted in my previous edits of the article) actually thanks her beta readers (and uses that very same term, as well) in the very first paragraph of the acknowledgements page. Some really big-name authors (Stephen King, Anne McCafferey, etc.) have read and endorsed that book (as seen in all the blurbs on the paperback copy I got from the public library), so the book is somewhat notable in and of itself - wouldn't the usage of the term in it under this same context provide a decent source?
I suppose that is the problem with the "This article does not cite its sources" tag. It's a bit gruff and doesn't really say much. :P
As such, it would be nice if people discussed why they added a tag when they do so. :\ I wish more people would. Runa27 18:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most people are dicks ;) . I've added references which should be suitable to remove the tag. Ironiridis 00:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: "Pre-reader" is a new term too. At least for published novelists, the term for the person performing this service has traditionally been "editor". Pais (talk) 13:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: (This comment is long enough and specific enough to warrant a section header of its own.)
Serious revision needed here. 
* [Edited to add: Revision done!]
* [Edited again: I realize the revision quotes heavily from blog pages. While all those pages are public, I'm going to move the revised version to a provisional sandboxy page and undo most of the changes while asking those authors for permission to quote their pages in this way. Thnidu (talk) 04:20, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: alpha vs. beta
Talk:Canton of Uri

message: I don't think Uri is common enough to grant its being as the primary article. I propose to move this article to Uri (Switzerland), and make the Uri a disambiguation page. --Yurik 18:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Power Quest

message: This article reads like a piece of magazine fluff.  Someone who knows the details (and can cite sources) needs to strip it down to the bare bones and re-write it.  Cain Mosni 19:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: All that stuff is just Copied and Pasted from the official website. Is that allowed? Scott w 20:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy + Paste 

message: I noticed Arthemis is not mentioned in associated acts. when Andrea Martongelli, Garvello, etc. were in Arthemis and Power Quest simultaneously until 2009 when Garavello split with both bands.
--Aeris97 (talk) 16:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthemis 
Talk:Kuroshio Current

message: Some sources refer to this as Kuro Siwo （クロシヲ). Older spelling?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.7.81.17 (talk) 22:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: YES! Silas Bent's 1872 map calls it this. I have no idea of the etymology, but  here is the illustration. Mang (talk) 19:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older spelling? 

message: is completely unimportant since it's a unsourced, b slightly wrong, and c completely unhelpful to English-language readers, who are going to naturally pronounce it something like /kəroʊʃiːoʊ/ or /kjurəʊʃiːəʊ/ regardless and don't need IPA to show them how to. See also . For the truly curious sumpsimi, the thing to do is to link to the name's Japanese entry at Wiktionary, which has the (slightly different and correct) Japanese IPA already. — LlywelynII 22:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese IPA

message: Hello All! As part of a class project, this page was selected to be updated by a group of oceanography graduate students in the College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric sciences with Oregon State University. Much of the original content was expanded upon, and the page was re-arranged to fit all of the new content. Some content was edited out. As always, edit as needed and reach out if curious about the project. Thanks and happy writing! BrightPe (talk) 23:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Page
Talk:Operation Logic Bomb

message: It is perfect as example of the flawless Engrish available to date. EDIT IS STRICTLY NOT TO ORDER FOR GREAT JUSTICE!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.44.153.1 (talk) 18:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please lock this article 

message: The last sentence is incomplete and needs clarification: „Enemies include common soldiers, cannon launchers, giant flying robots, and the low amount of continues (3) allowed.„ Honk1337 (talk) 07:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay-Section needs work
Talk:Laytown

message: Does anybody know when this name was put on the town, and why it was chosen over The Ninch, for instance? 86.44.18.83 (talk) 11:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You may find your answer in the archival records here. ~Asarlaí 21:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Laytown?
Talk:Mistel

message: Somewhere in the article, a note should be inserted that mistella is sometimes also written mistel (it may be an incorrect form, but it sure is a confusing one). --88.196.130.129 19:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi Wikipedians,  I wonder why the Mistel has been classified as a guided missile? AFAIK, once the lower component ("bomb") was released, the upper component had no way of influencing the course of it. Certainly it had an autopilot, to ensure that the missile was in the correct path to the target. But aiming was done by the pilot, before the release of the missile.  Unless someone has a good explanation for the current classification, I'll ammend it in a couple of weeks (as I also need to check some references beforehand... and see if adequate categories exist!).  Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 06:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Guided" missile??? 

message: In the article says: "...and the bomber component (which was often a new aircraft rather than surplus)...", which is not entirely true. AFAIK, in at least the first operational Mistels, the lower component was a war-weary Ju-88. In the much later projected, unbuilt versions (like the Führungsmaschine), it was to be new construction.  Again, I need to look for adequate sources/citations before ammentding the text. Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 06:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bomber" component
Talk:At the Zoo

message: This article is being considered for deletion due to the copyright violation of including the full lyrics.  I have removed the lyrics, except for the chorus (which is I think acceptable "fair use"). Please do not put the full lyrics back into the article! Someone (probably Simon) owns the copyright on those lyrics, and they could sue Wikipedia if Wikipedia allowed the lyrics to remain there.
I have also cleaned up the article a bit.  I like the song, and I think it is a good thing to have an article on it. --Brianyoumans 19:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Move requested at WP:RM completed: "At The Zoo"--->"At the Zoo".--Fuhghettaboutit 23:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move completed

message: What's the basis for saying that the trip to the zoo is made under the influence of drugs?  Do we want to include that assertion if this article is within the Children's Literature project?  Are the alternate lyrics in the article ones composed by Simon and Garfunkel?  What bootleg? I can't access the site. If these alternate lyrics have nothing to do with a Zoo, why is that info included here?  Is it a parody? Cites are needed for the assertions that the song is about the Central Park Zoo and that it was used in advertisements for the Bronx Zoo. Ileanadu (talk) 02:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Inclusions & Citations Needed
Talk:You're All I Need to Get By

message: The Method Man & Mary J. Blige song should be made into a seperate article.
:That's arguable. As short as the paragraphs are in the first place, there's not really a need for it. --FuriousFreddy 03:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

message: How could the article mention Method Man and Mary J. Blige, but totally ignore Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul? She made this song totally her own while she was still in her prime. Misterdoe (talk) 17:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aretha Franklin?! 

message: Should the use of this song in a Freeview advert in the UK, featuring a cat and a budgie, be mentioned on here? Don't want to do it myself in case it is subsequently removed.
Quizman1967 (talk) 22:28, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture
Talk:Children's Railroad (Minsk)

message: This was not the only children railroad in the USSR by far. And it is not the only children railroad functioning nowadays by far. The article about other ones already exists under the title Children railways. Although much more informative is a Russian wiki of that article and this Russian website. I see two variants:
*Moving this article to Children Railroad (Minsk), providing a link to Children railways in the "See also" section and mentioning there were and are a lot of them.
*Merging two articles.
I'm in favor of the first variant, because the separate article about the CR in Minsk exists in Russian. Any objections? Cmapm 19:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge or move?

message: What is the track gauge? Is it given in the Russian articles? Peter Horn User talk 02:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track gauge
Talk:Sagamihara

message: Why did the editor use an image of the Sagamiko station neighborhood for this article? 
The place of this image is Sagamiko(相模湖) town of former Tsukui district, it isn't center city area of Sagamihara(相模原).
Will there be any special reason why the editor used this image? If not so, I think that replacing is better... --58.88.72.195 (talk) 15:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have another picture? You're right, but we'd need a replacement. I have one of the Hashimoto area taken from Hosei University, but maybe the avenues near the City Hall would be better.Bakarocket (talk) 01:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: replaced photo with one of Sagamihara Station, which is more in the center of the city. --MChew (talk) 02:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: old comments from 2009

message: I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long. If foringner visit in Sendai, most people ask for shopping place. The years are missing from the copied elements.
* Tatsunori Hara - One of famous for sports person in Japan, baseball player and manager
* Ukyo Katayama - Former Formula One driver and mountaineer 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.23.5.48 (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable People 

message: I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long.  The years are missing from the copied elements.
*Sagamihara is many company's located on factory, develop center, and headquarter based. 
*printing machine and collactor machine product company of Duplo, glass material product company of Ohara, ventilation product company of Fuji Industries, book store chain of Book Off are headquarter base in Sagamihara, also, fiber optic and semiconductor product company of Yokogawa Electric, time recorder product company of Amano, cable wire production company of SWCC Holdings, personal computer production company of NEC, printing company of Toppan, toiletry company of Unilever, construction machinery product company of Caterpillar, digital camera product company of Nikon, system board production company of Mitsubishi Electric, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries are factory location in Sagamihara. Elpida, Tokyu Construction and many companies develop center in Sagamihara.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.23.5.48 (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: About Economy and Industry

message: I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long.  The years are missing from the copied elements.
* Isetan Sagamihara Department Store
* Okadaya Mores Sagami Ono
* Ario Hashimoto
* Miwi Hashimoto
* Aeon Shopping Mall Hashimoto
* Aeon Shopping Mall Sagamihara
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.23.5.48 (talk) 14:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Department Store and Shopping Mall