lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Port Wakefield, South Australia

message: Hello, I am Deno (Lord because Deno is taken) and I live in Port Wakefield. I have added a little bit but would like to know what others would like to see added. I hope to be taking some Digital Photos of the area soon.
Regards,
Deno
:Hi Deno, instead of having a heading of 'today', break it up into economy (ie all the travellers, trucks passing through etc), community (demographics from ABS site), and maybe geography (where its situated, surrounding land ie farms, mangroves, beaches, the gulf). 
An expansion of history would be nice too, if you can get any free info from tourist booths around town. The Catcher 03:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled section

message: The following has been removed from the article because it is not a correct statement  - "Port Wakefield was first visited by Matthew Flinders in 1802, while he was travelling to the Flinders Ranges and ".  Flinders' journal describes a visit on 30 March 1802 to the north end of Gulf St Vincent where the shore was reached by row boat from his ship which was shoaled in shallow water.  Flinders and his party eventually reached Hummock Mount (about  to the north of the head of the gulf) where observations were made regarding the survey of the coastline including that of Spencer Gulf. There is no mention of a visit to the site of Port Wakefield nor was Flinders going to the Flinders Ranges as the expedition had previously visited parts of that mountain range on 10 March 1802 (party lead by the naturalist Brown).  The relevant sections in the following online version of Flinders' journal are the section entitled "TUESDAY 30 MARCH 1802" in Chapter VIII  and the section entitled "WEDNESDAY 10 MARCH 1802"  in Chapter VII  -  http://www.gutenberg.org/files/12929/12929-h/12929-h.htm#chapter1-8.  Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 20:23, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visit  by  Matthew Flinders
Talk:Carrickalinga

message: Does anyone know?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ROxBo (talk • contribs) 08:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Population
Talk:Leigh Creek, South Australia

message: As a resident of Copley it was disturbing to see the entry for Copley divert to Leigh Creek, a modern town (1980) which was a re-location of the coal mine town of prior years, and yet no history of the actual town of Copley which despite the lack of presence on Wikipedia does indeed exist as a gazetted town with its own unique history.
Within the town that so far apparently does not exist there is a wealth of knowledge about the supposedly non-existent town - so I will open the forum for contributions to the history of the town. ( please send to njcarney1@yahoo.com if the wiki process bewilders thee!)
For the minute, rest assured that Leigh Creek despite being a lovely town is in fact NOT Copley and that Copley is in fact a town of at least 100 residents and these residents do refer to the town in which they live in as Copley, NOT Leigh Creek.
This is the first entry of the town that does'nt exist and will be populated with historical and current information about the township to redress the rumour that Copley does not in fact exist...recent correspondence received by the author was..."you don't exist! Wikipedia re-directs us to a town that does exist - Leigh Creek - If the town which you claim to exist IN does not exist despite having a post code 5732, I must question whether or not YOU exist?"
How does one respond to such idiotic messages born from Wikipedia mis-information? Provide information quickly or else perhaps perceived reality created falsely will become elsewise!!!?
A recent survey of town residents confirmed that 100% that they indeed believed the town in which they lived was in fact Copley...not Leigh Creek!!...one possibly inebriated resident pointed out correctly that the place of public inebriation was in fact labeled the 'Leigh Creek Hotel' - possibly the cause of the original confusion?? Wow great job guys why dont you just go to maquarie university. Oh wait thats only for smart people
One would hope the wiki editors can revert the subject title to 'Copley' rather than 'Copley SA' to reduce confusion, too much of which already exists on the site!
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Copley1 (talk • contribs) 09:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copley
Talk:Lyndhurst, South Australia

message: Lyndhurst, South Aust and Lyndhurst, South Australia appear to me to refer to the same place. Since the former is new, I propose its contents be merged into Lyndhurst, South Australia. -- Hebrides (talk) 15:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. The other page should never have been created. I have performed the merge and turned the other page into a redirect to here. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Marion Bay, South Australia

message: What's the official extent of Marion Bay according to the Geographical Names Unit? --Danimations (talk) 11:11, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer the link in the first citation in the article which I just upgraded.  Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 05:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extent?
Talk:Edithburgh

message: I have commented on the proposed merge at Talk:Wattle Point Wind Farm. --Scott Davis Talk 21:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Wattle Point Wind Farm]] 
Talk:Coonalpyn, South Australia

message: I'd have to dispute the Aboriginal name Coonalpyn meaning "Barren Women".  I came across the State Library list of Place Names of South Australia, and found that it means "place of mice excreta" from the word konangalpun.  I also base this on the that people had always thought Tintinara meant the same thing.
The address is here - Place Names of South Australia - C Dalekerrigan 07:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the name
Talk:Tintinara, South Australia

message: I believe that Photo is from Coomandook. 203.221.123.106 (talk) 04:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover photo. 

message: It would be good to include some information on who the traditional owners of the area were (likely to be the Ngarkat people) 58.108.31.235 (talk) 09:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous people
Talk:Tantanoola, South Australia

message: This feral animal - or furry furphy - continued to terrorise the district. It is mentioned in South Australian newspapers from 1901 until the 1940s. 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:E980:4F67:3197:3534 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tantanoola Tiger
Talk:Brecknockshire

message: I am concerned about the population figure, it needs sourcing.   It was present in the initial version of the article, and i consider it quite possible that 56,000 was the population of the county in whatever historic gazetteer that had been copied and pasted from. Morwen - Talk 10:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed this figure and also similar unsourced figures on Caernarfonshire and Radnorshire.  Morwen - Talk 10:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Rotary-screw compressor

message: Screw compressor
For more info on screw compressors go to http://www.enerquip.com.au/learningcentre.php  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.63.90.184 (talk) 23:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Diagram or photo needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericg33 (talk • contribs) 07:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PHOTO 

message: As far as I can tell, Twin-screw type supercharger is just a specific application of a rotary screw compressor.  Parts of that article actually seem to describe a rotary screw compressor better than this article manages.  I understand that these are technically two different subjects, but I believe they can be fully covered in a single article.  Thoughts? -Verdatum (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merge of Twin-screw type supercharger 

message: I can't make any sense of this "comparative advantage".  David R. Ingham (talk) 05:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "internal compression " 

message: It appears a rotary screw may have less or no cyclical stressing compared to a piston compressor, because the compression action is continuous along the length of the screw, rather than as surging that only occurs on the compression stroke of a piston.
This seems to suggest to me that it may be easier to built rotary screw compressors using materials more sensitive to cyclical stressing, and less uneven wear of the drive system. DMahalko (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyclical stressing advantage? 

message: Do these freely spin backwards if compressed air is applied to the "outlet"?
If so then it may be useful as a low-loss drive motor for compressed air energy storage, possibly being more energy efficient than other types of compressed air driven motors such as turbines, which freely "leak" supply air if the supply pressure is too low to overcome the load force. DMahalko (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

text: Actually the process is entirely reversible, aside from the leakage which is not insignificant and means that they also cannot work at very low volumes, although I suspect it would still be somewhat better at low turndown. I have not seen it used in mass energy storage but I am sure that is not from lack of awareness. Anyhow, this is not the best place to be asking these questions unless you find references of it being used for this and would like to add it to the article MasterTriangle12 (talk) 00:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as a compressed-air motor?
Talk:Henry Paget, 1st Marquess of Anglesey

message: Jane Austen once wrote "What can be expected of a Paget born & brought up in the centre of conjugal Infidelity & Divorces?  I abhor all the race of Pagets" in reference to one of this man's daughters (letter of March 13th 1817). Churchh 10:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The scandal of his divorce and remarriage deserves much more than the present parenthetical phrase (ODNB has two paragraphs). Septentrionalis PMAnderson 07:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: "At the end of the battle, he lost part of one leg to a cannonball."
This statement is inaccurate. As the article later states,  Uxbridge's knee was shattered by a sub-munition from an artillery round generally referred to as 'grapeshot,'  which was distinct from a cannonball, more properly referred to as 'round shot', which being larger and heavier might well have removed part of a leg. However, it was not until Uxbridge had been carried back to his quarters that it was decided his leg should be amputated above the knee (arguable 'most of one leg').
JF42 (talk) 23:13, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:    he lost part of one leg to a cannonball. 

message: "According to anecdote, he was close to Wellington when his leg was hit, and exclaimed, "By God, sir, I've lost my leg!" "
There are more contemporary references to the exchange between Uxbridge and Wellington, none of which contain the words quoted in the present newspaper reference. The closest in words is that given by Lord Fitzroy Somerset, twenty three years after the event in 1838, quoted in the journal of Charles Greville: 
"When Lord Anglesey [Uxbridge] was shot he turned to the Duke and said, “By God, I have lost my leg.” The Duke replied, “Have you? By God." "  Somerset was not present when Uxbridge was wounded.
More contemporary, and perhaps more convincing is that given in the diary of J.W.Croker on 8th December 1818 quoting Horace Seymour, who was next to  Uxbridge when he was hit and helped move the wounded general from the field:
"Rode with Horace Seymour. He was next to Lord Uxbridge when he was shot; he cried out: 
“I have got it at last.” And the Duke of Wellington only replied: “No? Have you, by God?"
Both references are from <waterloo200.org/wp-content/uploads/.../Wellington_and_Uxbridge.pdf>
JF42 (talk) 23:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "By God, sir, I've lost my leg!"
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Former countries/Archive 1

message: The idea of making taxoboxes for some of the former states appeals to me, but unfortunately we don't have any of the things for which I named the topic for most of the former European states.  I don't have any talent for creating such things on the computer.  Any takers?  Images of the flags can mostly be found at Flags of the World, but they have an awkward fair use policy. Another problem which arises - changing flags.  The Grand Duchy of Tuscany, for instance, seems to have had four or so, over the three hundred years of its existence.  Any thoughts on how to deal with such things? john k 07:20, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The taxobox is looking good. How about on multiple flags, we display the last one used and add a link to a page that displays them all?
I made the official name of the country have a solid background. Maybe we'll stack those on top of each other for name and flag changes, but it'll look awkward if only the flag changes and not the CoA. Before we call for technical help, we need to figure out what to include in the box. Ideas?--Jiang 01:37, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags, Coats of Arms, and Maps

message: I've just updated the 2011 archive to include the entire year and created a new archive for 2012's discussions. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 16:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived messages
Talk:Lists of unsolved problems

message: In the Calvin and Hobbes strip for October 29, 1990, Calvin remarked, "In my opinion, we don't devote nearly enough scientific research to finding a cure for jerks." Where would the question of whether this is feasible or even possible go? A cure for this condition would likely prove a considerable benefit for humanity. --Shay Guy 22:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a navigational collection of links to articles (A "Disambiguation" page). Anything with the title "Unsolved problems in [foo]" gets listed here. If those articles on humanitarian and political problems existed, they would be linked here. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsolved problems in medicine? Or philosophy? 

message: What happened to "unsolved problems in history"? Böri (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure one ever existed? There's no sign of one in the history of this page or the template's page, and no deletion log at Unsolved problems in history or List of unsolved problems in history. I think it may be not-yet-written... -- Quiddity (talk) 18:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe not on this article but a few years ago I saw an article like that. And there was another one: "Unsolved problems in Egyptology"! Böri (talk) 08:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It should've turned up in a search though. The Egyptology article did; it was deleted in 2007 after this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unsolved problems in Egyptology (Second nomination). (It can be recreated, if after reading the deletion discussion you think that might be a supported idea. See Wikipedia:Viewing and restoring deleted pages for details on getting access to the deleted material, in order to see what the problems were specifically.) HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

text:  Some of the problems / unknowns mentioned on the following pages may be important enough to list on an "unsolved problems in history" page: --DavidCary (talk) 14:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The humanities seem to be under represented here. I'm not a subject expert myself, but surely within the rigorous fields of inquiry that exist under the humanities banner, there are hotly contested unresolved questions that remain a topic on contention among the experts? 202.155.85.18 (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unresolved Problems in Gender Studies 

message: Carl and Mary Dennie were on unsolved mysteries.. I know where he is  Angel3040 (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carl Dennie  

message: I understand they are covered within other disciplines (math, computer science, philosophy...), but think it also deserves its own page Darth Pro 6 (talk) 11:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surprised not to see Unsolved problem in logic
Talk:HMS Prince of Wales (R09)

message: The malfunction of the starboard propeller is a notable event and is supported by widespread notable references. It belongs in the operational history section. Coldupnorth (talk) 19:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, have seen it is duplicated. Will add those references to existing text. Coldupnorth (talk) 19:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2022 malfunction

message: When the ship was commissioned in 2019, the Prince of Wales was Charles, but now it is William.  Is the ship named for a specific person, like her sister ship, or is it named for the title, or is it named for the several men who have held the title? rogerd (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question... - wolf 06:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No it is named after the title, not the person holding that title.https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/defence/how-did-hms-prince-of-wales-get-her-name-cost-captain-crew-size-and-where-royal-navy-aircraft-carrier-was-built-1097947  This is different to HMS Queen Elizabeth - which is clearly named after a person and not a title; just not the recent Queen Elizabeth.  It is named after Elizabeth I.https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/royal-navy-press-team-confirm-monarch-hms-queen-elizabeth-named/ Mark83 (talk) 09:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, I thought that might be the case.  I know that when the previous ship of the same name, HMS Prince of Wales (53) was launched in 1937, the title was vacant, and the previous holder was the then-abdicated King, so the RN was likely in no mood to name a ship for that individual.  Of course, I am an American who has British ancestors (my mother was born in Kent), so I can't speak for the RN or the British people. --rogerd (talk) 02:49, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, you're considered "British by descent"... so there's that. - wolf 04:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namesake
Talk:Judge Guthrie

message: I've semi protected the page for a couple of weeks - you seem to be suffering from a persistent IP editor trying to make a point. Apologies if this inconveniences genuine new and IP editors - please post your edit request here and one of the regulars can make the change for you. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection 
Talk:Kenneth E. Boulding

message: It seems to me that all the text currently in Kenneth Boulding's Evolutionary Perspective and Psychic capital could fit in here, probably summarised. I very much doubt whether any encyclopedia user will find their way to the other article. Itsmejudith 10:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course not. Kenneth Building is a person, and psychic capital is an idea. Merging the two articles would be like merging Karl Marx and marxism articles.... --R.Sabbatini 13:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with R.Sabbatini, also in relation to Kenneth Boulding's Evolutionary Perspective. The idea and the person should remain different articles because the idea has enough information to constitute its own article (obviously) and should not require reading all about the person's life. Uris 13:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I'd agree in principle with R.Sabbatini and Uris. What's at issue also is whether the idea meets some sort of criteria of importance: has the concept of psychic capital been used by others, how, etc.? Not every idea of such a scholar merits separate articles, of course, but some certainly do. If the articles are not to be merged, then some of the content on the idea in the biography page should IMO be deleted & transferred out to the idea page (leaving a mention w/ link). --A12n 14:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: It appears they've actually been merged since Dec 1, 2006. I'm removing the merge tag and changing psychic capital into a redirect. Whitejay251 02:36, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It seems 

message: was he able to profit from his ideas?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.168.139 (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  did he get rich? 

message: How come there are no pages for those two books? Janosabel (talk) 19:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boulding's Citation Classics
Talk:Golden Skillet

message: There is a Golden Skillet that operates on 6116 Jahnke Road  Richmond, VA 23225-2639. The old sign is still in use and the interior remains untouched. When you walk in you are bathed with 70s yellow and olive green. The only thing that is different is several Asian pieces of artwork. The owners are Thai and they have been operating the restaurant for many years. They use the same recipe. Richmond's own C.F. Sauer spices are used. (This information is from a local Richmonder (myself) and native Virginian.)
There is another Golden Skillet chain that operates in Petersburg, Virginia (Greater Richmond/Tri-Cities). They have a website at 
 http://www.goldenskilletofvirginia.com/ .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.61.228.11 (talk) 17:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golden Skillets in Richmond and Greater Richmond Virginia 
Talk:Juvenal

message: Missing is a discussion of how he was received in his lifetime, and what critical and financial success and social status a Roman writer might have enjoyed. (In this vein, how did ancient authors made money without copyright and mass duplication?)
Is there any speculation on children? The text describes his later relation/descendent as rising in status by "assimilating themselves" -- without the possible context of them inheriting wealth or fame from Juvenal himself  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.158.254 (talk) 23:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Success in His Lifetime and His Posterity 

message: The article refers to "The traditional biographies, including the Vita Iuvenalis" -- and then bases a paragraph on their contents.
But these traditional biographies of than Vita Juvenalis are never named.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.158.254 (talk) 23:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Biographies? 

message: I cannot find a reliable reference that attributes this quote to Juvenal. I did find a mention elsewhere that it's in Satire VIII; however, when I look at the text of Satire VIII, I cannot see it. I think this attribution should be deleted if no reliable reference is available.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiona-bc (talk • contribs) 17:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ask not what your country can do for you..." quote 

message: "At first glance the Satires could be read as a critique of pagan Rome." What other way is there to "read" it? --  Haxwell (talk) 16:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  At first glance the ''Satires''... 

message: To judge from the space given to it, someone thinks an extremely important aspect of Juvenal is that Heinrich "Boll" read him. Or maybe not?2A02:AA1:1018:FAB:388C:55BD:FECE:ED23 (talk) 18:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heinrich "Boll"
Talk:Judaism in Newcastle upon Tyne

message: I note that this page is entirely unreferenced, and has little chance of expanding beyond its current state. The subject matter is hardly worthy of an article in itself.
Judaism in Gateshead, however, is an important topic but doesn't exisit. Gateshead's Jewish community is one of the most important in Britain. Perhaps a Judaism in Tyneside or Judaism in the North East of England article could be created, and content in this article merged into it? --SandyDancer 11:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)