lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Krystyna Kuperberg

message: It's very gracious to mention my uncle Andrzej's connection to Mizar, but it really ought to go on his own biography page, separate from that of my mom.
I would like to stay away from promoting my relatives on these pages; someone else should start the page for my uncle.  (I did edit this page for my mom, but mainly to remove some of the stuffier praise.)  He was born January 29, 1941.  He is married with two children.  His home page has various professional information which may be of interest.
Greg Kuperberg 19:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not so much being gracious as it is noting a fact. --CSTAR 20:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's gracious to recognize him for his work, and my mother for hers, is what I meant.  But if so, he should have his own page. Greg Kuperberg 20:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for Andrzej Trybulec? 

message: Again, I don't feel like adding material about this myself, but I can mention that my family emigrated to Sweden because of the Polish "anti-Zionist" campaign.  It was really an anti-Semitic campaign, as the page for it explains.  My dad's entire family left for various other countries.  My mom's family is not Jewish, which is why all of her relatives stayed.
Greg Kuperberg 20:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why they/we moved
Talk:Gemini 2

message: Can anyone explain why this article says
*" The landing was 26 km short of the planned impact point, and 84 km from the recovery aircraft carrier, the U.S.S. Lake Champlain."
but the splashdown article says it missed by 38 km?
*"Gemini 2 	January 19, 1965 	16°33.9′ N 49°46.27′ W (http://kvaleberg.com/extensions/mapsources/index.php?params=16_33.9_N_49_46.27_W_) 	USS Lake Champlain CVS 39 	38 km"
Gene Nygaard 01:30, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splashdown
Talk:Monster infighting

message: Monster infighting is possible in Max Payne (not sure about Max Payne 2, though) to the extent that enemies will fire upon their allies if you are collinear with them, but they will not retaliate against each other. Still, I find this an interesting way to play the first chapter of Part II (you start off with just a baseball bat and are supposed to sneak into a room with weapons, but I'm not that good at stealth). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ubern00b (talk • contribs) 22:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max Payne 

message: I notice there are a lot of entries that refer to non-player character factions that dislike both the player and each other naturally (Halo's Covenent and Flood) or things like Dungeons & Dragons-style charm and confuse spells (Diablo II's Convert ability) instead of actual monster infighting. Actual monster infighting, in my opinion, must meet some conditions:
# The monsters in question must not have been targetting each other before the player engaged them.
# The infighting must have been caused by an accident of some sort, most likely by the player's design.
# The infighting must start as a chain of reprisals under their own volition.
I don't think that entries like Grand Theft Auto, Half-Life or Mercenaries really qualify, and will clean up the article in a few days if nobody objects. 67.180.206.34 10:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done and done. 67.180.206.34 06:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not really infighting 

message: I remember when playing doom that if you shot a monster first, then had another monster shoot it, the monster would still continue to attack the player as his "target" (a variable?) was already set to the player, shoot until kill or be killed I assume.
Is this correct, because I can't remember entirely before I add it.-70.74.122.87 20:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infighting
Talk:Fleet saving

message: This page still has a lot of lingo i copied this from a forum post at my alliances message board] and since i thought it was so good i added it however i still need to remove the lingo and the shorthand.
Wormeyman 02:03, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
:It's okay, but you need to Wikify it; that is, you need to link to some of the stuff to other pages in Wikipedia. ~~Shiri —  Talk~~ 07:11, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
:I am concerned this text looks more like a strategy guide or Howto than an encyclopedia article.
:I am removing the following statement:
::(unless of course the incoming fleet is from a member of the RAWK alliance, if this is ze case, please notify them to make sure they have sent ze recyclers[lol])
:Because the statement seemed arbitrary and out of place, more importantly, and it was brought to us by a site that also had  added junk to other articles like Church . --Mysidia 14:58, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

message: This is such a minor branch of a subject that it doesn't deserve an article. It also reads like a how-to guide. The basics should go to OGame and the detail to wikibooks:OGame. Gerard Foley 00:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Infatuation

message: I have resolved the discussion at RFD on this redirect (suggested for deletion 2004-11-22) as no consensus. Here is an archive of the discussion:
* Infatuation -> Limerence: a real word redirects to a neologism... something's wrong with that picture. --Joy [shallot] 01:10, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:RFD|RFD]] resolution 

message: This page directs to "Limerance", saying infatuation is a form of limerance.  But the second paragraph of the target page quotes: "infatuation... [does] not refer to limerence" and directs back to this page.  Predawn 19:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Circular Link

message: *Providing an accurate definition and stubbing the section is preferable to redirecting to a (very) vague approximation.
*Limerence is expressly defined as being distinct from infatuation (indeed, that's the whole rationale for its existence), which leads to a direct contradiction between articles.
*A broader, established concept should never, ever, ever redirect to a narrower, unstable neologism.
204.161.5.200 18:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirecting to limerence is a far less acceptable solution, as it's contradictory, circular and the limerence article is riddled with problems.  A definition to determine context and a link to the wiktionary article will suffice for now.204.161.5.200 02:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to limerence

message: Well, I believe that a page should be created on "infatuation," and that at the top of the page a link should be created that the reader can click on to visit the disambiguation stub for infatuation. As with any article, an article on infatuation would require information. Anyone care to visit their local library in search of that information?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Knightskye (talk • contribs) 18:49, 4 November 2006
: I added "see also" limerance because the two concepts are supposedly related (although after reading the article on limerence I can't say that I really know). 68.49.208.76 02:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreeing on an Infatuation Page 

message: What is the significance of the court case [426 N.W.2d 459 (Minn. 1988)] that is listed as a reference for this article?  69.140.164.142 10:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: court case?

message: reference removed —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hengsheng120 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No relationship between court case and infatuation 

message: I think they should add in ways people with infatuations can control them in their daily lives if it is an issue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindsayhawkin17 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: Wikipedia, who do you have a crush on?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedia has a crush on (talk • contribs) 23:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What the heck is wrong with this guy?--RainbowsAndPonies (talk) 15:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question for Wikipedia
Talk:Aggadah

message: It should be noted very clearly in the article there is no psak for Jewish thought or historical data.  See also, Perush
HaMishnayos on Shavuos, at the end of Makkot. 203.214.133.79 17:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: technically you are right, but I don't see why it 'must be made clear. There are many ideas that are almost universally accepted (that there are 613 mitvot, for example) and we needn't mention that someone who says otherwise is still orthodox.  In a certain sense you can say that mussur is not binding like halakha, but still it is important and universally accepted.  Jon513 16:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No psak 
Talk:Bronchospasm

message: Bronchospasm is constriction of the bronchioles, not the bronchi (which do not constrict because they are cartilaginous rather than muscular).
Bronchospasm causes hypoxia, not cyanosis, which is a late sign of the hypoxia bronchospasm can cause.
Is it really important to say that they can be caused by cold housing? 75.61.108.90 (talk) 03:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Lonely Swedish (The Bum Bum Song)

message: Per the VfD discussion archived at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Lonely Swedish (The Bum Bum Song), this article has been retained. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 02:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD consensus

message: Is "bum" Canadian slang, as well as British? 惑乱 分からん 14:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadian slang

message: Is nonsensical (2nd paragraph) really the right word? It makes perfect sense, it's just about something stupid. Nonsense songs normally contain actual nonsense words, and feature largely disconnected sentences. How can it be nonsense when his bum actually is on all of those things? 
79.71.6.204 (talk) 22:43, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsensical
Talk:Operand

message: :In mathematics, an operand is the object of a mathematical operation, is a quantity operated on.
I'm not a native speaker, but this sentence seems off.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.153.139.153 (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper English? 

message: It seems a bit odd to me that this page has such a large section explaining the order of operations, when order of operations has its own article.    Sophus Bie (talk) 05:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: PEMDAS is the reason schoolkids make mistakes when calculating value of expressions. It should be banned, IMO. Mikus (talk) 23:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of operations 

message: I disagree with the given example for the PEMDAS section:
 In a mathematical expression, the order of operation is carried out from left to right.
 Start with the left most value and seek the first operation to be carried out
 in accordance with the order specified above (i.e., start with parentheses and end with subtraction).
This would produce a wrong result if certain operations are not grouped - Multiplication and Division being the first group, and Addition and Subtraction the second. Consider: 4+2-3+1. -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 15:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: PEMDAS is the reason schoolkids make mistakes when calculating value of expressions. It should be banned, IMO. Mikus (talk) 23:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correctness of PEMDAS explanation
Talk:Selly Oak

message: this is all in the top section:
A number of colleges, mainly theological, collectively called the Selly Oak Colleges are now part of The University of Birmingham. These include the College of the Ascension, originally founded to train women missionaries. After the College of Ascension being closed down the USPG and the Methodist Churches in UK have started a new centre for Mission Studies at the Queens College, Somerset Road, Birmingham. This centre is known as Selly Oak Centre for Mission Studies (SOCMS). Rev Val is the Director for this centre and Rev Dr Joshva Raja is the tutor for the world Mission Studies.
shouldnt this be in a seperate education section? & why is it all about only 1 of the colleges?
--r-c-h-w 19:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 
Talk:List of mayors and lord mayors of Adelaide

message: Two for and one against, and you close it with the comment "no consensus"? Please enlighten me. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have mentioned to Favonian, after reading the guidelines for consensus for moving, I begrudgingly accept this is a valid RM outcome, but it does now leave me not being able to edit these List of Mayors/mayors pages becaused "correcting" Mayor to mayor and moving other existing List of Mayors/Lord Mayors to their lowercase equivalents would be WP:POINTs. So the inconsistency is entrenched until someone ignores all rules and fixes the problem one way or another. (NB "fixing" the problem by changing the remaining article titles to lower case means you need to also change the contents of all relevent articles to lowercase too.) Mark Hurd (talk) 00:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 
Talk:The Beatles' Long Tall Sally

message: As seen here, the album's back cover: https://aboutthebeatles.com/wp-content/uploads/beatles-long-tall-sally-can-back.jpg it would help greatly if its statement of having a "new recording of 'Roll Over Beethoven' " were explained in the article (i.e. why it says so!). 70.17.165.126 (talk) 23:23, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New recording of 'Roll Over Beethoven' "??
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Netoholic 2

message: I draw any interested arbitrators attention to User_talk:Netoholic#Blocked_for_violation_of_arbcomm in case you want to comment. Or remove the block. William M. Connolley 22:39, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  User_talk:Netoholic#Blocked_for_violation_of_arbcomm
Category talk:Disasters

message: Many articles in this category need to be assigned to subcategories. -- Beland 04:10, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: There are many things both man-made and natural that could lead to disaster or are posing a threat of disasters. I suggest that a category like this should be created.Shannon1talk contribs 01:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Potential Disasters?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Everyking 2

message: Could the arbitrators who voted accept explain their reasoning? Why was this not instead referred to mediation? Everyking 15:25, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why was this accepted?

message: I would like to note that, although the stated penalty in the precedent section of the arbcom page for defying an arbcom ruling is a year ban, that I think Everyking's positive contributions sufficiently outweigh his Ashlee edits so as to be worth softening the blow. I ask specifically that no non-Ashlee bans be implemented, and that if Everyking is sent to reapply for admin status, an explicit provision be put into the ruling that would allow him to retain admin status with a lower than normal vote threshold. Snowspinner 21:50, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
:The notion that I have defied an ArbCom ruling is simply laughable. Simply because some other admins choose to interpret what I do in a certain way does not mean it's so. There has not been a single case of an edit made by me since January that could be considered a revert of an Ashlee article by everyone, since what are being called "reverts" are things such as restoring a portion of text in an attempt at compromise or removing a link that was just one small portion of someone else's edit (unless you count the SNL articles and Oct. 24, which were outright reverts, but I stopped reverting those after the clarification). Certainly I have never consciously or intentionally reverted. Everyking 22:07, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Paul Butterfield

message: There are conflicting accounts about Butterfield's early days: Wolkin and Keenom write that he focused on the harp early on, but Bishop recalled it came later.  Also, Field says he attended the University of Chicago, while Reney identifies University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana (but Bishop attended U of C).  Until more RS are found, these two points are left —Ojorojo (talk) 16:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wolkin and Keenom have Bishop (p.36) saying, "I was fooling with a harp at the time, and he was a bit more into guitar. I guess he had started on harp. . . .he gradually switched to harp.  Within about 6 months he was almost as good as he was going to get."  Wolkin and Keenom also have Butterfield (p. 40) attending the University of Chicago Lab School, which was a high school run by UC. Some of this could be used, even if it conflicts as long as the sources are mentioned, and the discrepancy too. Carptrash (talk) 18:07, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see some of it is already there. Carptrash (talk) 18:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early days/university 

message: Since the applicable sources state his death was an "accidental drug overdose", not a "heroin overdose", should this article be removed from :Category:Deaths by heroin overdose in California, or is the involvement of heroin enough to remain in it? Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 07:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Deaths by heroin overdose in California 

message: : There have been attempts to add unsourced material about Butterfield's family. Since it is inconsistent, I have removed the third paragraph all together. When reliably sourced material is found, it may be added. A google book search shows one appearance for Gabriel: "Gabriel Butterfield accepted the award for his father" (Ward 2016) but nothing for Lee nor Virginia. —Ojorojo (talk) 13:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: Why is this among the missing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpfeil (talk • contribs) 22:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Original Lost Elektra Sessions 

message: I met Bugsy years ago one time after my Comet broke down in St Joe Missouri.en route home after a Philly Spectrum Dead show. My travelling companion one of a junkyard where I could buy a temporary vehicle as the Comet had overheated and thrown a rod. While at the junk yard a man who said his name was Bugsy Maugh appeared from where he lived next door. We talked..he said that he had played onstage with Paul Butterfield and that he played bass. This was years ago and I have been unable to substantiate that claim. 2601:645:4300:4B00:D05C:6CB9:564A:3DFB (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bugsy Maugh 
Talk:Vermicelli

message: Do we need the original Italian terms (camerlengo and doi o tre anni?) Thanks! Dpr 04:32, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just ask any pasta manufacturer, or the dictionary: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/vermicelli?&path=/
76.29.225.28 (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'm confused about why the description says vermicelli is thinner than spaghetti, yet the table of measurements still lists it as thicker.2601:1:9780:371:217:F2FF:FE37:5766 (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The picture is wrong.  The dictionary clearly says vermicelli is thinner, and if you've ever bought a box, you would see the manufacturers say this too.  Vermicelli is my pasta of choice specifically because it's thinner.76.29.225.28 (talk) 05:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vermicelli Is Actually Thinner Than Spaghetti

message: Did you know that vermicelli is actually an old name for spaghetti? The word spaghetti seems to have entered the Italian language only in the 19th century or, at least, that's when it is first documented in a written text: Li maccaroni di Napoli ("The macaroni of Naples") by Antonio Viviani, written in 1824. Earlier than that, spaghetti was usually referred to as vermicelli or maccheroni in written texts, though we can't know if the word spaghetti was already in use in the vernacular language: since it is not documented before that date, one can assume that it was at least not as common as vermicelli or maccheroni, though it has later taken hold in everyday talk.--Teno85 (talk) 03:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vermicelli vs. spaghetti: trivia on the historic use of these two words 

message: The spelling from Urdu is pronounced siwaiyyan rather than seviyan
150.101.89.115 (talk) 01:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urdu transliteration wrong 

message: This page covers two distinct types of pasta (one thicker than spaghetti and the other thinner). It should be split into two pages, perhaps Vermicelli (Italian pasta) and Vermicelli (thin pasta)? --Scudsvlad (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: the term vermicelli covers even more than just two types of pasta. It is better to have one article about all varieties of pasta which called in English vermicelli. Delasse (talk) 09:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Oppose - Vermicelli is more than just about the Italian pasta and thin pasta, separately. Even corn vermicelli can count as a vermicelli variant. Hansen SebastianTalk 08:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal 8 June 2021 

message: Rice vermicelli in Thailand is come from Chinese Tradition, we also call it liked in Chinese language as หมี่ or เส้นหมี่ in Thai, not วุ้นเส้น (Wúnsên)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2403:6200:88A2:6C58:44CA:8513:A75F:B908 (talk) 17:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not วุ้นเส้น (Wúnsên) in Thai =
Talk:Gaikokujin tarento

message: The Japanese article is called "Gaikokujin Tarento", which makes more sense, since the word "gaikokujin" is recommended over "gaijin" in the Japanese media anyway. Any objections to me changing the name of the article? Spacecat2 06:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would have been appropriate to discuss this with the wiki project Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Gaijin_tarento people first.  They have already had the discussion.  You'll also want to go about changing the categories that refer to Gaijin tarento.  Bollar 14:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, I'm thoroughly indifferent on this, but Gaijin is more common in English literature than Gaikokujin.  You have a redirect, so I'm sure this can be found, but it's not what most English speakers will expect.  Bollar 14:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose the move and suggest it be changed back.  "Gaijin tarento" is overwhelmingly more common (10x more so based on a quick Google, I'm getting 2600 hits vs 260), and while "Gaikokujin tarento" may be more politically correct, WP:NAME should have precedence.  (Interestingly, gaikokujin.talent also gets a fair amount of hits, but almost all of them seem to be related to a talent agency of the same name.) Jpatokal (talk) 12:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Frankly, I don't think Google hits is the alpha and omega of validity metrics.  Do you have any other reasons for opposing the move?  I don't care that strongly one way or the other, but I suppose I would choose "gaikokujin" over "gaijin".  -Amake (talk) 01:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese articles

message: :Is there any kind of evidence that most Japanese people expect Americans to look rugged? I guess it makes a little bit of sense, but the article makes it sound that if a foreign talent doesn't look rugged, he won't be successful.
::Preferred term or not; I've never heard these guys referred to as "Gaikokujin Talent". Hill of Beans 19:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rugged

message: This page has no content except explanation of the phrase and a list of characters. Proposed merge with main article. --Voidvector 02:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If merging, please create a new section for it in the main article. --70.128.126.65 17:57, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: It feels like some people are missing.  I can think of Ousmane Sankhon  and the Canadian guy who lives in a log cabin in Nagano prefecture and used to do sausage commercials on Japanese TV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Westwind273 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Tarento