Talk:Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck

message: Please stop adding the machine guns. The specifications are for Mk.5 which did not have this armament. Differences between variants should be delineated in the "Variants" section or on a separate "Variants" page if warranted by space.
From MoS Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content
Note that these specifications should relate to a specific variant of the aircraft, and be labelled accordingly. Usually this will be the most famous/noteworthy/numerous one.
Thanks! - Emt147 Burninate! 19:22, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm really sorry, that is my own stupid fault, I didn't notice that the specifications were for the Mk.5 specifically. My Bad!! mhunter 21:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem! Thanks for contributing! :) - Emt147 Burninate! 23:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Armament

message: I added this:
:"projected swept-wing CF-103 evidently never passed the artist's concept stage."
based on a book I've read on the CF-100. There's a diagram or picture of a Canuck fuselage with wide-chord swept wings, captioned CF-103. As far as I know, she never got off that paper. If anybody knows more, please include it!  
Also, I've seen references to "Velvet Glove" missile trials. Am I right those were for Sparrow? Trekphiler 10:13 & 10:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: At variants

message: A number of image files have been deleted recently that are posted on a few pages that I watch. This article and the CF-116 article are the ones that I remember. I don't know how to back-track deleted images to see why it was done, so I have no idea why they were deleted. After the fact, a user has removed the dead files from the infoboxes here and on CF-116, but didn't bother to attempt to replace the images. I don't know if this users had anything to do with the original images being deleted or not. That's all I know. - BillCJ 01:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image deletions

message: Substituted at 01:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707064111/http://445squadron.com/index.php?p=1_23_NEWSPAPER-STORIES-1998 to http://445squadron.com/index.php?p=1_23_NEWSPAPER-STORIES-1998
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120705115524/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil:80/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2677 to http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2677
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130104091059/http://www.castleairmuseum.org:80/avro_canuck.html to http://www.castleairmuseum.org/avro_canuck.html
*Added  tag to http://www.capa-acca.com/vintagelist/vintage_aircraft_list_4of4.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120730071041/http://www.comoxairforcemuseum.ca/AirPark/canuck.html to http://www.comoxairforcemuseum.ca/AirPark/canuck.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120903005402/http://www.petemuseum.org:80/CF100.html to http://www.petemuseum.org/CF100.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: - Ahunt (talk) 16:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312213644/http://www.asmac.ab.ca/aerospace/main_collection_details.asp?list_id=7 to http://www.asmac.ab.ca/aerospace/main_collection_details.asp?list_id=7
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Do we need this section? I followed the link and the page has no mention of the CF-100 that I could find. If the a/c is alluded to somewhere in fiction or "the media", maybe the Aircraft in fiction page should be updated accordingly- BC  talk to me
:It all got removed, so I'll fix this article. - Ahunt (talk) 20:37, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable appearances in media

message: Note 1 simply shows "Rossiter 2002, p. 63"  Can anyone tell me what reference is being made here?  If anyone fixes the reference, could they please inform me at pat@hyperion.co.nz?  Thank you.  I am unable to understand how the four tildes provide a signature: reading the documentation appears to state that they provide a date and time stamp.  
202.27.236.240 (talk) 05:36, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. The Rossiter reference would refer to the full citation, which should be located in the bibliography. The full citation is indeed missing. We may be able to find it via the article's history (it may have been accidentally deleted). Yes, just type in four tildes in a row, the tildes should then be highlighted in gold and the magic happens after you "publish changes".- BC  talk to me 07:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Or the information was copied from another article, and the person doing so didn't copy the whole reference over. As to the signature, don't sign the articles, only posts on talk pages. Also, it does no good to add the tildes in an edit summary, as you can't sign summaries, though it seems to be commom with some users nowadays, for whatever reasons. - BilCat (talk) 08:19, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes Query 

message: This article states: "During 1981, all of the remaining RCAF CF-100s were withdrawn from service, having been succeeded by newer fighters such as the McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornet." This is a somewhat misleading statement. The CF-100 was withdrawn from frontline service as a fighter in 1963 when replaced by the CF-101B Voodoo. A small number did continue in secondary roles, such as ECM training, but to say the aircraft was directly succeeded as a fighter by aircraft such as the CF-18 is a bit of a stretch.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:4280:A710:0:0:0:9C4 (talk) 22:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point,  - Ahunt (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Really?