lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2008 Masters Tournament

message: Does anyone know if it was unusual for Immelman to have won after leading after every round? I heard some presenter imply that it was, but can't find a source for it now. 128.243.220.41 (talk) 18:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One presenter here said it was the first time someone had won after leading every round since (i think) Ray Floyd, if that's any help. Don't have time to research it now though. Ged UK (talk) 20:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Immelman 
Talk:Vancouver Canucks (WHL)

message: it== Recreating article ==
Why is the fake Johnny Canuck WHL logo featured on this article? The logo originated with a Victoria program around 1970 along with other caricatures of WHL team logos. Why isnt the logo the Canucks actually wore on their sweaters and used in print shown?
Now I know that the main Vancouver Canucks article has more information on it, I am trying to expand this article once again to be a better source for the pre-NHL Canucks. Kaiser matias 01:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Why is this even a separate article, if this team is the predecessor of the current NHL team? I think this page should be merged into the main one. Mizzou1993 (talk) 21:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Aside from them being two different teams, even if they share the same name, its long been policy to have spate articles for various incarnations of teams, as it allows for more complete information regarding the relevant team to be added, instead of condensing in the name of being a meaningful length on pages. And it would really not serve any benefit to merge, its not like there is a finite amount of space being taken up. Kaiser matias (talk) 14:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merge
Talk:Kenneth M. Pollack

message: This site:[JP] has an article from an Israeli newspaper about this subject.An Kenneth Pollack tells something about the nuclear program of Iran.Agre22 (talk) 15:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kenneth Pollack and nuclear Iran 

message: I am removing several external links that seem outdated; If anyone can re-incorporate them into the article in a beneficial way, please do so. 
* "USG0-1" in AIPAC espionage scandal is former CIA analyst Kenneth Pollack 
*http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/18/good-reason-to-be-skeptical-of-dog-and-pony-iraq-visits/
*http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/12/ohanlon-greenwald/
*http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/06/ohanlon-six-months/
KConWiki (talk) 05:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Trimming excess and obsolete External Links
Talk:USS Koka (AT-31)

message: Isn't that just a scanno of Koka? See the navsource version, where it's spelled "Koka" throughout. (There's no version at hazegray.org, where the entries are converted by hand.) — Bellhalla (talk) 03:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken the liberty of removing what seems an obvious (to me, at least) typo at DANFS. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  KoJca? Really?
Talk:Tenji period

message: Most sections of this article are mirrored in other pre-Taihō articles about non-nengō time frames, e.g.,
 
* Saimei (period)
* Tenji (period)
* Kōbun (period)
* Temmu (period)
* Jitō (period)
* Mommu (period)
 
* Sujaku		
* Hakuhō period
* Taika (non-nengo)
IMO, the value of the individual articles outweighs the prospective utility which may flow from consolidating them. --Tenmei (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Psalm 98

message: It is proposed on Talk:Psalms to drop the text of psalms from the individual psalm articles.  If you wish to weigh in, please do so there. Tb (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion on Talk:Psalms in no longer on the Talk page as it has been archived, but it is still visible at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Psalms&oldid=1014332018. The discussion appears to be unresolved. However, the text quoted in the Psalm 98 article has both Hebrew and English texts, but the reference links to the chabad.org page where the English translation is said to be copyrighted by Judaica Press, see https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/16319/jewish/Chapter-98.htm. I can't see any information which addresses this copyright issue so unless anyone can advise to the contrary, I am proposing to delete the English version paralleled with the Hebrew text. I'll leave the KJV version in place. - BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Done, both Ps 98 and Ps 102 - BobKilcoyne (talk) 01:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Drop text
Talk:Psalm 100

message: It is proposed on Talk:Psalms to drop the text of psalms from the individual psalm articles.  If you wish to weigh in, please do so there. Tb (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Drop text

message: Please add the information from the box to the lede before including a box on this article.  Once this has been done, we can then assess as to whether a box is of any benefit to this article. It's ludicrous that we as an encyclopaedia are now concentrating more on adding information to a sodding infobox rather than writing it into prose in the lede section. We seem now to be so far removed from being able to write an "encyclopaedia", in the OED meaning of the word, that we may as well start calling ourselves WikiInfobox.  Let's not forget what we are truly here for. CassiantoTalk 11:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: If Anglican is Protestant, we can return to simply Catholic and Protestants. However, a user - forget who when which psalm - said it is not, and needs to be singled out. Now what's right? "Anglican and other Protestant" is not right, - Lutheran came first, and should not be among "others". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Anglican Protestant? 

message: This information was removed from the article: Magdalene Schauss-Flake composed a setting of Psalm 100 (in German), “Jauchzet dem Herrn, alle Welt.” (source:Stewart-Green, Miriam (1980). Women composers : a checklist of works for the solo voice. Boston, Mass.: G.K. Hall. p. 64. ISBN 0-8161-8498-4. OCLC 6815939)
T. E. Meeks (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm the editor who removed the text; see this thread on the original poster's talk page for more context. Graham87 19:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magdalene Schauss-Flake Composed a Setting of Psalm 100
Talk:Pneumoencephalography

message: I am uncertain about the veracity of the comments concerning the length of time necessary to replete the CSF after the procedure.  Physiologically, we recycle CSF 2-3 times daily, producing 0.4mL/min (about 600mL/day) to fill a volume of about 150mL. Source: Johanson CE, Duncan JA 3rd, Klinge PM, et al. Multiplicipty of cerebrospinal fluid functions: new challenges in health and disease. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 5:10 2008   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.93.6.11 (talk) 03:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

message: After adding to this article, I just found another article on pneumoencephalography. Since the other is somewhat more detailed as well as older, this one should really be merged into the other. Does someone know how to do this?  Dirac66 01:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed about the merge. You'd just merge the material from Pneumoencephalogram into the article Pneumoencephalography, then replace the content of Pneumoencephalogram with #redirect Pneumoencephalography. Gordonofcartoon 03:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication
Talk:Lesser mouse-tailed bat

message: This article improved from 'Stub' class to 'C' class, with addition of one image and 5 references, thanks to a request for collaboration in improvement of this article on Facebook group "Bats of the Indian Subcontinent". Thanks to all members of the group, especially Bikramadittya Guha Roy for participation and encouragement and Soumya Sarkar for making an image freely available. AshLin (talk) 09:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborative Improvement
Talk:WIMS

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for an engineering research center sponsored by National Science Foundation is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the research center. - Dravecky (talk) 06:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/A Raider Like Indiana

message: User:A_Raider_Like_Indiana
      run at Tue Jul 31 02:00:35 2007 GMT
Image:		5
Mainspace	456
Portal:		1
Talk:		27
Template:	8
User talk:	88
User:		133
Wikipedia talk:	1
Wikipedia:	32
avg edits per page	3.24
earliest	16:03, 4 March 2007
number of unique pages	232
total	751
2007/3 	325 	
2007/4 	118 	
2007/5 	86 	
2007/6 	133 	
2007/7 	89 
A Raider Like Indiana's editcount summary stats as of 03:00, July 31st 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 02:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sulawesi stripe-faced fruit bat

message: Note the new species of Styloctenium that was just described (Esselstyn, J. A. 2007.  A new species of stripe-faced fruit bat (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae: Styloctenium from the Philippines.  Journal of Mammalogy, 88:951-958) from Mindoro: Styloctenium mindorensis.  --Aranae 21:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New species
Talk:Juan Carlos Ramírez Abadía

message: Is there any reason that the link to Cuba-US relationship page is on this page?198.96.180.245 (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuba-US relationship link 
Talk:Rowntree's Fruit Pastilles

message: Has anyone noticed these? Great idea, they're my favourite flavours. I've added a sentence about these to the article. LDHan 17:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the drugs you know where widely used at one point. Coca-Cola famously contained Cocaine, Hitler did Crystal Meth, and most likely, sweets would have contained drugs too, to increase enjoyment. ☯Ferdia O'Brien (T)/(C) 14:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Packs with only black and red pastilles

message: I bought a 600g box of these from a local British food importer and they contain no artificial flavors or colors, and they contain the additional flavors of grape and apple - or to be more precise, they contain those fruit juices in addition to juices for the fruits listed in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CGameProgrammer (talk • contribs) 21:48, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ingredients and flavors are wrong?

message: Fruit Pastilles were first made in Fawdon, Tyneside, England in 1881.
Perhaps someone would care to fix the above - the Fawdon factory dates from 1958. Further, the district known as Fawdon is a surburb of the city of Newcastle upon Tyne.87.192.210.37 (talk) 17:50, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Error 

message: There are way too many Citation Needed labels in this. For example, anyone in the UK or Ireland can just buy a pack of them to verify they are still packaged in foil-backed paper, with paper outside that.
zoney  ♣ talk 23:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed 

message: This entire section is made up sensationalist anti-vegan nonsense. 219.120.59.227 (talk) 04:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Death"
Talk:Brock's yellow-eared bat

message: Brock's Yellow-eared Bat was discovered by Stan Brock (philanthropist) while he worked on the Dadanawa Ranch in British Guyana.  I don't know how to show that the Binomial name Vampyressa brocki was derived from Stanley Brock. Check talk:Stan Brock (philanthropist) for a source. I think there is a standard way to do that, but so far I have not been able to find out how it is done. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stan Brock
Talk:Winged Foot Golf Club

message: Bandon Dunes and Pacific Dunes are also in the Top 100 and in the same property... sentence in first paragraph seems incorrect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.30.173 (talk) 01:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed statement. wjematherbigissue 08:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:Charlestown High Bridge

message: To expand.  The lumber accident that bent the bridge's support beam and scattered 2x4s in the Charles River. It also caused one of the worst traffic backups that morning... I still remember that being one of the last hurrahs of this bridge before it was torn down. The TV stations talked about it non-stop as well.
*
CaribDigita (talk) 05:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lumber truck bending the support column
Talk:Warthog

message: Why did you removed this site: https://www.chron.com/sports/outdoors/article/Warthogs-invade-South-Texas-6671689.php ? There is increasing evidence that warthogs are turning up on South Texas. Even Facebook's Pleistocene Rewilding pages says that warthogs are invasive species now in Texas. Here's two sites here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/62438068622?view=permalink&id=10156829406953623 and https://m.facebook.com/202258796511399/photos/a.207530345984244.52426.202258796511399/1219246571479278/?type=3 Dinosaurus4321 (talk) 16:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Trivial instance of a wilding population - it does not belong in the very first sentences. Integrate into body of text if you must. (And stop proffering Facebook as a source, it's not reliable. The first source is sufficient). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

message: By WP:COMMONNAME and WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. 75.156.69.248 (talk) 02:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the article be titled Warthog? 

message: I hope someone knowledgeable about warthogs can explain what purpose that facial wattles may serve for this animal.50.234.60.130 (talk) 06:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facial wattles
Talk:Minimum bounding box

message: This is a very very basic concept in mathematical geometry that doesn't require a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.126.221.67 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 31 July 2007
:Everything in wikipedia requires source, see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Twri (talk) 00:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No source required 

message: Could someone find a way to explain it in terms that are understandable to the average person? --V2Blast (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readability 

message: Bounding box redirects to this article, but according to the article Minimum bounding rectangle it is just another expression for minimum bounding rectangle. —Kri (talk) 00:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does "bounding box" mean?
Talk:Northern pudu

message: Strange that this article states that the Norther Pudu is only the second smallest deer in the world (conflicting claims to the smallest goes to either the southern Pudú or the Leaf_muntjac (or Leaf Deer). However based on the the heights/lengths/and weights cited in the articles all seem to point to the northern Pudú as the smallest deer in the world. If the sizes cited in the articles are correct, then Northern Pudu is the smallest deer in the world and the other articles should be corrected accordingly. Otherwise the cited sizes should be corrected to match the text claims.
:And what an odd way to word it.  This article states that this animal is smaller than the world's second smallest deer species, yet nowhere does it claim the title of smallest deer species.  --Aranae (talk) 14:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Smallest deer
Talk:Berkley–Dighton Bridge

message: This article could use some clean up to distinguish the different bridges at this location - including the most recently demo'd and the current temporary bridge, as well as the future bridge.--Marcbela (talk) 23:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you know what you have in mind, I figure.  I'm no longer in the area, so I can't keep up with this.  The third bridge is now completely gone? - Denimadept (talk) 04:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

text: I've opened this question at the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bridges#Bridge replacement page. - Denimadept (talk) 04:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You're probably right.  Until then, is going with this idea bad? - Denimadept (talk) 14:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article now is a bit confusing. The into refers to the bridge that isn't built yet, the photo shows the temporary bridge and the infobox lists stats for the recently demolished bridge. Plus, the bulk of the article refers to the 1896 demolished bridge. It needs to be better organized, IMO. If the article is going to be about the 1896 bridge, that should be the focus. See for example: Tacoma Narrows Bridge which is about the current bridges, and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge (1940), their famous, but non-extant predecessor. Perhaps this article can be split now - have a "Berkley Dighton Bridge (1896)", and re-tune the current article for the current temporary bridge and the future bridge.--Marcbela (talk) 17:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's even better, yeah. - Denimadept (talk) 05:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Linkify: Berkley–Dighton Bridge (1896).  Let's start. - Denimadept (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've made a start, creating the new article about the old bridge from this article, then revising this article to focus on the coming bridge.  It still needs work, such as a more recent image, perhaps showing the existing infobox view as it is now, plus the construction site with the total lack of a crossing to the north of the temp bridge. - Denimadept (talk) 22:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorg
Talk:Brightman Street Bridge

message: There don't seem to be any good pictures of this bridge.  I speak as one who went there to specifically take such pictures with no particular joy in the results.  I may have to go back there and try again, but I welcome advice on how to do a better job this time, as it's a roughly two hour drive each way.  I'll get new pictures of the replacement while I'm there, if I do this.  I need better light, that I know.  Does anyone have a boat on the Taunton River we could use as a platform to get better angles? - Denimadept (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I may have some in my archives... will check. Or, I am only 1/2 hour away, if that, so I'll put it on my "to do" list. --Marcbela (talk) 20:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I took some new pictures yesterday.  I'll likely start scanning the slides tomorrow evening, then see what I've got. - Denimadept (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor Pictures

message: This link no longer works.  I noticed when trying to resolve the "ibid" issue.  I've currently got an e-mail in to srpedd.org to find out what's happened to the document. - Denimadept (talk) 20:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://www.srpedd.org/Ch7bridges.pdf reference 

message: I see the list article now claims this bridge is closed to all traffic.  Have they opened it permanently?  Is this an official change?  Have they now decided to remove the bridge?  When will they do it?  Source? - Denimadept (talk) 21:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes -Both ends are gated, until they decide what to do, I guess.--Marcbela (talk) 23:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed to all traffic? 
Talk:Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge

message: Should some mention be made of the ornamentation on top of the towers of this bridge, as this seems to separate it from other US Army Corps of Engineers built vertical lift bridges? Applepwnz 03:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome to add something about the architecture if you wish.  It'd be best if there were refs for it.  What would you call it, some kind of minimalistic Art Deco? - Denimadept (talk) 01:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Design
Talk:Charles M. Braga Jr. Memorial Bridge

message: This bridge is effectively the end of the Taunton River.  RI 114 goes across one of a number of different places in Mount Hope Bay. - Denimadept (talk) 14:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is no "downstream" from this bridge 
Talk:Congo clawless otter

message: According to the last revision (Version 1.10, December 3rd 2023), all the species of Aonyx (A. capensis, A. cinereus and A. congicus) as well as the the only extant member of the genus Lutrogale (L. perspicillata) are moving/were moved to the genus LutraGimly24 (talk) 16:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aonyx species + Lutrogale perspicillata --- > Genus Lutra
Talk:Great Bridge (Cambridge)

message: I believe the current entry about “The Great Bridge” over the Charles River in Massachusetts, USA, being the FIRST bridge to be built over the Charles River (1662) is inaccurate. The first bridge was built over the Charles River was built in 1640, just a few miles up the river, in Watertown. Dan McNichol (talk) 18:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles River, Boston 

message: Correction: First one built in 1641 Dan McNichol (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  “The Great” Charles River Bridge
Template talk:Power Corp

message: Should GBL's minority holdings be on here? I worry about the scope and relevance of including such. Vagary 03:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minority Holdings

message: Gesca has divested itself of all but one newspaper, La Presse. This rather complicated organigram needs to be updated, therefore. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: La Presse is no longer owned by Gesca, so that should be removed too.  162.208.171.22 (talk) 18:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Gesca
Talk:Bahamian raccoon

message: The article says “binomial name,” but is referring to the subspecific epithet, which is the trinomial name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:c433:d580:751f:6439:4770:7074 (talk • contribs) curprev 21:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the whole name is trinomial. I replaced "binomial" with "subspecies". Largoplazo (talk) 22:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trinomial name
Talk:Cathedral Church of St. Paul (Boston)

message: I have removed this:
::"From the 1880s until 1980, St. Paul's had a choir of men and boys. Its last choirmaster and organist was Thomas Murray, who is now university organist and professor of organ at Yale University."
Although I have little doubt that it is correct,
*it is completely unreferenced
*it is misleading, as he was neither the last choirmaster not the last organist at the cathedral
*it overemphasizes the role of one person in the long history of the church -- while mention of the architects is completely appropriate, an organist, even one as distinguished as Murray, is just one part of the liturgy and he was only here for five years of the nearly 200 year history of the cathedral.
. . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs)  10:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Murray