lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Child benefit

message: Small update and expansion.  Refs still needed forsection and for wikilinked articles.  Historical child benefits in Australia included "Child endowment", "Family allowance", "Family payment".  No promises, but would like to do my best to get them article-ised. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Child_benefit#Australia]] 

message: Shouldn't the opposite be mentioned here as well (taxing people for having children) ?
See The economics of birth control
Some seem to be like-minded:
* http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2012/02/29/should-we-give-tax-breaks-for-having-children/
* http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130823031641AA55ZS5
* http://forcechange.com/55447/reduce-overpopulation-and-national-debt-by-ending-tax-incentives-for-having-more-than-two-children/
* http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=603174
80.200.234.65 (talk) 08:53, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxing people for having children

message: A single table containing all available countries is needed in order to compare benefits.    ----MountVic127 (talk) 06:28, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparing countries
Talk:Kayser (band)

message: I disagree with 64.240.177.100's deletion, this band is notable and sucessful (minimally in Europe).
:Please remember to sign your post with 4 tildes (~). Also, consider finding reliable, third-party references for this band (i.e. NOT the band's official website), otherwise I will be re-tagging the article for non-notability. Per Wikipedia policy, your opinion on the band's notability is meaningless; it has to be sourced. Cheers! --Managerpants (talk) 10:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emily (Journeyman)

message: This episode appears to have timeline issues.
Emily is kidnapped and rescued in 1992, when she is 12. We then travel to 1995 and finally 2001, when Dan saves the girl who was supposed to be killed. After the 1995 trip, Jack mentions that the dead girl was discovered in 2001, however, before the 1995 trip, Hugh tells Dan that the 2nd victim "went missing about a year later - turned up dead". The girl Dan rescues in 2001 doesn't look like someone who's old enough to have been kidnapped for 8 years, nor does it make sense that if the girl was kidnapped a year later than 1992, Dan mentions that he has to stop Bennett in 1995 before he kidnaps the next victim ("if he hasn't already") - by then it would have been three years after 1992. The only explaination I can think of is that either the "a year later" was an oversight in the script, or that the actor emphasised it wrong, and they meant to imply that she went missing, and then turned up dead about a year later. Did I miss something? TheHYPO (talk) 11:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline problems?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Critical source examination

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live!
Talk:The Name of this Book is Secret

message: I'm still a little fuzzy on notability of books, but this book has been reviewed in detail in Girl's Life Magazine (December 1, 2007), the Washington Post (January 13, 2008)and was nominated for an Edgar award (Juvenile) in 2008. Don't know if that is enough, but it's still a really good book. shorlin (talk) 19:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: It says in the biography part that BOTH Dr. L and Miss Mauvais lived in the 1800's. This is incorrect, as Dr L (being the magicians twin brother) was 9 years old in World War 2, and had to flee to America when Mussolini came to power. This is a long time before he event met Mauvais, so he cannot have lived in the 1800's according to the book.
- Kiya  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.167.93.121 (talk) 08:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information about Dr. L 

message: Has anyone else noticed the the name of the 'dead' magician (Pietro Bergamo) has the same inicials as pseudonymous bosch? From do you think they're the same person? I highly doubt Bosch didn't notice this, even if it isn't the way it's supposed to be. I'm reading #2 now, and I have #3 so I'll post again soon if it turns out to be anything!
Katarian Clifton (talk) 04:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  co-incidence? 

message: I've cleaned up the Article and added a 'Reception' section which also takes into account the negative reaction.
So that's the "fan site" issue resolved.
I've given it reliable references.
So that's the "no references" issue resolved.
This thing was nominated for an Edgar Award, was a New York Times best-seller, and reviewed by the Washington Post and numerous other magazines and newspapers (Worcester News, Sunday World).
So that's the "notability" complaint destroyed.
I think we can take down the whole notice now, as it makes the page look blemished and somewhat messy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Sheridan (talk • contribs) 19:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Issues 

message: In the infobox, it says that the book was published in the United States (the website and publishers confirm this). However, the UK cover of the book is shown. The original cover, first edition (if possible) is always in the infobox. I am going to upload the U.S. edition. --Glimmer721 talk 21:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: US or UK?

message: \After reading this book I google searcehd it and came across http://www.thenameofthisbookissecret.co.uk/
a mysterious website not giving much of what you would do.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.103.229.114 (talk) 23:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  For more info
Talk:Kamikaze-class destroyer (1922)

message: See 神風 (2代神風型駆逐艦). Fg2 (talk) 12:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been corrected. --MChew (talk) 06:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi! Does anyona have any informations to this statement: "addition of an improved 4.7"/50 cal. main gun which was designed as a dual purpose mount."? It is copy/paste from  (is it ok?) but it sounds like bullshit. According to navweaps.com there wasn't any "4.7"/50". The only AA (or DP) 4.7" was 12 cm/45 (4.7") 10th Year Type. All available sources claims that the armament was 4 x 4.7"/45. That's exactly what you can see on the picture of Kamikaze in infobox. Where it hidden this mysterious 4.7"/50 which is invisible on the picture??? o_O
And one more note: Hayate was not the first lost warship of IJN. Prabably only the first lost DD. She was lost 1941-12-11 but until that time IJN lost at least all midget submarines at Pearl Harbor and December 10: submarine I-70 by SBD from USS Enterprise and minesweepers W-19 off Aparri and W-10 off Vigan (both airstrikes). Bye... --Sceadugenga (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DP gun and first lost 
Talk:List of Roman auxiliary regiments

message: The word Regiments is not really correct here, is it? Units would be better.
--Nantonos (talk) 21:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Is there a way to change this? CsikosLo (talk) 12:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Move(in between discussion and watch) the article to a new name. Wandalstouring (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Regiments
Talk:Bessel beam

message: I was led to this article via a BBC News item today. However, the second sentence of the article states "It is particularly important to note that the fundamental zero-order Bessel beam has an amplitude maximum at the origin, whereas a high-order Bessel beam (HOBB) possesses an axial phase singularity at the transverse origin where the amplitude vanishes as expected from the mathematical descriptive nature of the high-order Bessel function of the first kind". Pardon? What is this in English? Perhaps some editor can improve this lead as per WP:MoS General principles, clarity --Senra (Talk) 15:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's saying the zero-order beam is the only mode that has an intensity peak at the center of it's axis. For all higher-order modes, the same intensity cross-section is donut shaped. 162.246.139.210 (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Say what? 

message: Added diagrams of Bessel beam etc. Removed reqdiagram tag. Egmason (talk) 10:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice diagrams. Thanks.--Srleffler (talk) 04:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

text: Is it just me or is the first maximum off-center in the cross-section? Laura Scudder | talk 17:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be an artifact. I see it off-center in the thumbnail, but correctly centered in the full image.--Srleffler (talk) 01:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagrams

message: The article needs a formula and derivation of the Bessel beam. 178.39.150.251 (talk) 16:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: A formula, but not a derivation. Wikipedia is not a textbook.--Srleffler (talk) 02:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs math
Talk:St Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin/Archive 1

message: So the convention in England is different than that in Ireland? Why is there a full stop after "St", unlike at St Paul's Cathedral? --Jiang 00:03, 22 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: 2003 posts

message: Why was the church not given back to the Catholic Church when Ireland became independent? --80.121.103.244 00:44, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There are some who believe that the Church of Ireland is more true to the original ethos and theology of the original Celtic Church and so there would be no reason for the "ownership" of the building to be given back ie. you can't "give back" what you have always owned.  Plus it was useful as a symbolic tool for some of the majority to use to increase the sense of grievance against the perceived enemy within (ie. non-RCs). You also seem to be confusing the state with the RC church which are not one and the same Albatross2147 01:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not given back?
Category talk:Cultural studies

message: "Culture", per se -- things that are the subject of cultural studies -- shouldn't really be categorized here. Cultural studies is a vast field; it would involve linking, for instance, everything from literature to film to language to social behaviors to anthropology - etc. Instead, there should be a List of cultural studies topics. --Lquilter (talk) 12:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prehistoric Rock Art Sites in the Côa Valley and Siega Verde

message: Done some. But it still needs a lot of work. This is one of the most important open air paleolithic art sites - it deserves a good and comprehensive article! The Ogre (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion and improvement

message: This article should be updated in order to include "Siega Verde" as an extension for this World Heritage site. --77.227.31.244 (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:Babergh District

message: Simple question: how do you pronounce this?? — sjorford++ 19:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounciation?
Talk:Borough of Brentwood

message: The first sentence of the Transport para is more properly an introductory sentence (slightly amended to show the conurbation, not really two separate places) Peter Shearan (talk) 09:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Amendment

message: The Endeavour School is a special state school covering both primary and secondary (age 4 to 16)
I've added a special schools category because this school does not fit the primary or secondary list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.230.222 (talk) 11:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Endeavour School
Talk:Borough of Broxtowe

message: Broxtowe case. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 10:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do 
Talk:Julmahuvi

message: The Janne Reinikainen -link is to a football player born in 1981. He surely isnät the same guy who was in SJ (judging by his age). I don't know how to change it not to link to the football player, so I just mention it here.87.93.49.156 (talk) 14:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Reinikainen
Talk:Sweat the Small Stuff

message: In the rounds section Quiff of Grimmy is the name of a round but in the round description quaff is used. Which one is correct? Mobile mundo (talk) 02:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be quiff, so I've corrected this. 6ii9 (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks (Mobile mundo (talk) 13:48, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quiff vs Quaff
Talk:The Ernie Kovacs Show

message: * The Museum of Broadcast Communications: THE ERNIE KOVACS SHOW(VARIOUS)
* Time: The Ernie Kovacs Show The 100 Best TV Shows of All-TIME
* TV Acres: Nairobi Trio
* IMDB: The Ernie Kovacs Show
* Funny or Die: "Nairobi Trio" From The Ernie Kovacs Show (1956) Video clip
* Classic Themes: The Ernie Kovacs Show
--jwalling (talk) 20:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Template talk:Reach of the European Union

message: Enlargement is a very specific policy of the EU. Initially, the template used 'expansion' in its title, which captures more appropriately the spreading of EU power and reach. In English, it is not an imperialistic word at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.106.133 (talk) 00:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion and enlargement
Talk:Asplenium rhizophyllum

message: *This plant is anything but rare.  In many limestone areas, it is one of the most abundant species around rocks, and it can be frequent even in areas of neutral to subacid sandstone or other rocks. jaknouse (talk) 16:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Dharma Primary School

message: Does anyone know if the ofsted report has been done? Is there any hope of getting state funding for the dharma school? Frank Walsh (1962) (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

message: This page has been tagged as unreferenced for five years. There is no indication of notability that would override the general policy that primary schools are non-notable. It can be covered at the local settlement page.--Charles (talk) 09:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: (1) MERGE (and AfD and everything else that involves the removal of content) is not CLEANUP. If it needs to be improved, it needs to be improved. Not removed. (2) Unless something has changed about which I'm not aware, there is NO general policy that primary schools are non-notable. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 09:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This a somewhat unusual primary school as it is the only Buddhist school in Europe. "Notability" is determined by the availability of sources not by the type of school. Lack of references is not a reason for a merge. Dahliarose (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

text: The burden of proof is on editors adding material to provide sources. This has been tagged for five years.--Charles (talk) 17:00, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick search yielded a high-quality source from the BBC website which I've now added. The article is already sourced from two books. No doubt there will be many other sources available when editors have more time to investigate. Wikipedia is a work in progress. There is no requirement that articles have to be completed or fully referenced within any given timeframe. Dahliarose (talk) 17:49, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to settlement page
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-11-19/Khobar plagiarism

message: In a similar vein, I was slightly bemused that the Wikipedia article on Andrew Mynarski VC that I largely authored and/or edited appeared in a Remembrance Day display on Andrew Mynarski at our local aviation museum. As opposed to the earlier Khobar Towers plagaiarism, the museum staff did properly attribute the source of the material. FWIW Bzuk (talk) 13:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Turgeon (horse)

message: I think this page should move to Turgeon (horse) and the new disambiguation should move to this page. 
* The horse is not a notable as his name sake
* There are several people with that sername
* There aren't many hits to this page 
* There is both a French and a Dutch version of the page, "Turgeon", are disambiguations, not about the horse.
* Hence, the horse is not the primary topic, and hence the disambiguation page should be the first thing someone sees when typing the word "Turgeon", and not the horse.  Oldag07 (talk) 13:56, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the input Froggerlaura Oldag07 (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved it. Had time, and it wasn't very controversial. Oldag07 (talk) 12:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Entrance Hall

message: Good article but wrong name. There are millions of entrance halls worldwide and it is not appropriate that Wikipedia's article should be about one in particular. It would be helpful if someone can move it to Entrance Hall (White House). ProfDEH (talk) 08:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong title

message: The picture captioned "McKim, Mead, and White renovation of the Entrance Hall in 1924 during the administration of Theodore Roosevelt" is incorrect. Theodore Roosevelt was president from September 14, 1901 – March 4, 1909. He was dead in 1924. Either the year is incorrect, or it should read the Coolidge administration.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.249.222 (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Caption
Talk:Arriflex 35

message: We're not entirely correct. The camera's designation was ARRIFLEX in capital letters until the advent of ARRIFLEX 16. From then on, 1951-52, it became necessary to call the first one ARRIFLEX 35. There was never an ARRIFLEX 16 ST by the way. Filmtechniker --80.219.78.115 (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:History of Harringay (1880–present)

message: Moved to Talk:History of Harringay - 1750 to 1880 as this is the article in which this reference appears. hjuk (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Great Exhibition of 1862]]

message: I was going to go through this section, editing any minor errors, eg typos and so on; however there seems to be some serious issue with discontinuity. Reading from the beggining of the section, it is not clear what 'estate' is being referred to. Then comes a reference to the death of 'Chapman', again with no clue as to who this is. Later on it becomes apparent that Edward Chapman was at one time the owner of Harringay House and attached estate. It almost seems that some of these paragraphs should perhaps be switched around, changing their order, but leaving them otherwise pretty much intact. Perhaps there was an error in copying and pasting of material when the page was assembled. If that is the case it might be easier if whoever wrote the section could attend to it. I don't feel I know enough about the history of Harringay to start mangling the section, so I am reluctant to wade in, for fear of distorting the accuracy of the narrative. Dubmill (talk) 19:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Dubmill. Hope that's a bit better now. Your editing of the Harringay stuff is much appreciated. I ended up throwing mud at the wall when I added all these Harringay articles meaning to come back and tidy them up. Then Harringay Online kinda took over! hjuk (talk) 22:10, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers. In answer to your question, I have not yet entered any text on my user page so the link comes up in red (which on wikipedia means 'doesn't exist'). Dubmill (talk) 22:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[1880 to 1940; The  development of West Harringay]]
Talk:Starosel

message: Apart from Kitov (please, add references for text), is anybody else saying that this is a "temple with mausoleum"?74.58.89.100 (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

message: ::Anything prior to 1000 BC belongs to Neolithic cultures.Thracians are identified at 1000 BC
*John Boardman, I.E.S. Edwards, E. Sollberger, and N.G.L. Hammond. The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 3, Part 1: The Prehistory of the Balkans, the Middle East and the Aegean World, Tenth to Eighth Centuries BC. Cambridge University Press, 1982, p. 53. "Yet we cannot identify the Thracians at that remote period, because we do not know for certain whether the Thracian and Illyrian tribes had separated by then. It is safer to speak of Proto-Thracians from whom there developed in the Iron Age..."
*Check Neolithic article and related articles to see which culture corresponds to any 2,000 BC or 3,000 BC for example discovery.Megistias (talk) 10:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neolithic and Thracians
Talk:Irish St. Leger

message: The following red links have been excluded from this article and are placed here for reference. Zafonic (talk) 21:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links

message: When were geldings first allowed in the Irish St. Leger? Who was the first gelding to win the Irish St. Leger? Mobile mundo (talk) 19:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geldings
Talk:Jamie Little

message: :Image:JamieLittleClintBowyer.jpg poorer quality image. Royalbroil 04:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Backup image
Talk:Fulwell, London

message: As you are well aware, this text is not compliant with WP:UKTOWNS and [[WP:UKCOUNTIES}}  because, as we have seen elsewhere, in wikivoice we do not assert that the historic counties still exist in their previous borders. You say that historic county should be in the lead, and that advice is in WP:UKTOWNS, but guidelines for leads also state that leads must summarise the main text and in this page there is no history that explains anything about a historic county so the text inserted about historic county is not a summary. Remember that historic county is only mentioned in the lead when historically the place was in a different county to the current one. If the page doesn't make that clear, that information does not belong in the lead. 
So what to do? Well I would suggest simply reverting in your preferred non compliant text is not the answer. Rather, there must be an edit to the main page to add in history that can be summarised, and then compliant text goes in the lead. I will see what I can do now. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic County in the Lead