Talk:Rupee

message: It seems like this page should become a disambiguation page (and there should be pages for the Indian Rupee, Pakistani Rupee, "Hyrule" Rupee, etc...)
Japan also used Rupees in the past. Not sure of the timescale but certainly during WW2.
The Japanese issued Rupees, but these were for the Japanese occupation of Burma (1942-45). - (Aidan Work 01:50, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Images and infomation about other variants of the rupee in other countries should be noted in this article (User:71.116.94.54 12:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rupee

message: It mentions it used to be worth about six dollars in current currency, but I see no indication of current worth. -Iopq 09:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The numbers were wrong. I corrected it. The amount of silver of the "original" rupee is worth US$4 today.    In the late 19th and early 20th century, 1 rupee was a little less than 1/2 of USD. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 10:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Worth now

message: :Image:5000rupiah2001.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:5000rupiah2001.JPG

message: :Image:PKR 5000 Front.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:PKR 5000 Front.jpg

message: The map in the main article needs to be altered to remove Indonesia. Indonesia is not Rupee territory. Although the word Rupiah may have the same etymology as Rupee, the Rupiah is not a Rupee. The Rupiah is actually descended from the Dutch two and a half silver Guilder coins that corresponded to the Spanish silver dollars in the Netherlands East Indies. David Tombe (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Indonesian Rupiah is not a Rupee

message: I have edited and moved the information regarding the new symbol for Indian rupee from the top of the intro page to under the 'Indian Rupee' section. The intro should be about the definition and other such facts. --ifesvr (talk) 11:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Indian Rupee

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Rupee's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Redy":
From History of the rupee: 
From Indian rupee: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Rupee]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Rupee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100711053911/http://finmin.nic.in:80/the_ministry/dept_eco_affairs/infrastructure_div/message_symbol_final.asp to http://finmin.nic.in/the_ministry/dept_eco_affairs/infrastructure_div/message_symbol_final.asp
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100627235834/http://ptinews.com:80/news/740593_Cabinet-defers-decision-on-rupee-symbol to http://www.ptinews.com/news/740593_Cabinet-defers-decision-on-rupee-symbol
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rupee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516085855/http://www.rbi.org.in/currency/museum/c-mogul.html to http://www.rbi.org.in/currency/museum/c-mogul.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516085855/http://www.rbi.org.in/currency/museum/c-mogul.html to http://www.rbi.org.in/currency/museum/c-mogul.html
*Added  tag to https://www.rbi.org.in/currency/museum/c-mogul.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The table has Telugu రూ (ru) and Sinhala රු (ru), but Kannada ರ (ra).  Should this be ರೂ (ru)?  If I plug ರೂ into Google Translate, it gives me "Rs" as the English equivalent.  Do they really use just ra in Kannada or is this a typo? Pelagic (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbreviation in Kannada 

message: A large part of this article is taken up with a section on the symbol. Elsewhere we have Dollar sign, Euro sign, Yen sign, Indian rupee sign, Ruble sign and so on. So unless anyone objects, I would like to spin off the #Symbol section of the article into a new Rupee sign article, leaving just a  and a short summary here. Comments? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. -DePiep (talk) 23:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As no objections have been raised in over a week, I will go ahead. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: split article to create a separate Rupee sign article 

message: Is this column really worth having? It seems to me to contrary to WP:NOTGUIDE. It is always out of date. The individual articles each have a section giving links to forex rate sites if anybody wants to know. Does it have any useful purpose, or is it just yet another proxy for the India/Pakistan rivalry? Is there any convincing reason to keep it? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:37, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value section: column giving "value" (actually price) v US dollar 

message: 11.66 g, .917 fine silver)
What the fuck does this mean?
Either the coin weighs 11.66 grams and the purity is 11/12, fine, that makes sense. Why not just say so?
OR the coin contains exactly 11.66917 g of pure silver but we don't know how much alloy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7d:b730:5800:449e:676d:f348:8e41 (talk) 23:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The article fineness explains the meaning of standard usage like ".917 fine". Fractions like 11/12 are never used. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

text: I have reworded that sentence so that it now says: . Does that hit the  spot? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  11.66 g, .917 fine silver) 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Rupee's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "rbi-c-mogul":
From History of the rupee: Mughal Coinage  at RBI Monetary Museum. Retrieved on 4 May 2008.
From Indian rupee: Mogul Coinage  at RBI Monetary Museum. Retrieved 4 May 2008.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Rupee]] 

message: "The European powers started minting coinage as early as mid-17th century, under patronage of Mughal Empire."
IIRC, coins were minted in Europe by the 4th millennium BCE (Crete, Minoan civilisation), and not by authority of the Mughal empire, which did not exist until the Middle Ages. If this sentence is meant to say that the European powers started minting coinage within the Mughal Empire under patronage, please explicitly say so as the sentence as it stands is misleading IMO. I don't right now have the time to chase down the sources on this matter, which is why I won't make the edit myself at this time, hoping somebody who does, will. Thanks. --Stizzleswick (talk) 01:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  European powers minting coins 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion