lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Parr

message: John had a call from one of the world's most successful producers, David Foster.
Please 216.206.242.200 10:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs a re-write 

message: The only support for the claim "Parr has sold 10 million albums worldwide" is from a press releaseurl=http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/5/prweb8424670.htm. There is no evidence that any one of his solo albums sold a million copies. If this figure includes sales of the St. Elmo's Fire soundtrack, the claim is misleading, as this album contained only one song by Parr (albeit the biggest hit from the album). --Fosterpan (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out. I have removed it. SmartSE (talk) 22:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "10 million copies" claim
Talk:Liberal People's Party (Norway)

message: I find the intro very confusing. What party did "some of Fremskrittspartiet's members" perceive to have become less liberal? Who is Tor Ingar Østerud? What's with the "cup of coffee"? What court made what judgement in favour of the liberalists? heqs 10:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: confusing intro

message: It should be mentioned in the article that the party seems to be an objectivist party, although they probably also have members who do not subscribe to this current. A look at their web forum will confirm their close connection to the variety of objectivist theory and politics that is promoted by the American Ayn Rand Institute.
Above all, the Liberal People's Party should not be referred to as libertarian, since their leading members are very critical towards this ideology.--213.236.196.39 (talk) 18:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We do not cite web forums in an encyclopedia. Obviously, the party should be referred to as libertarian, owing to its many libertarian stances, such as the abolition of immigration control, welfare state, drug prohibition, etc. --Eisfbnore talk 18:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your opinion on the difference between classical liberalism and libertarianism, and why can we not just classify the Liberal People's Party as classical liberals (as they themselves do) in order to mark a clear distinction between them and the murky umbrella term libertarianism (in which they find many ideological opponents)? --cun 15:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See this edit summary. Classical liberalism is a much wider definition, and an even more murky umbrella term than 'libertarianism'. Also, the term 'libertarianism' is very rarely used in Norway, and when it is used, it is normally associated with Rothbardian anarcho-capitalists and advocates of the non-agression principle. In the English-speaking world, the term can house both minarchists and anarchists. The term is ambiguous, though 'classical liberalism' is even more ambiguous, which ranges from proponents of the Nozickian minimal state to proponents of a limited welfare state. Putting 'classical liberalism' in the infobox may give readers very wrong impressions of the party. I think 'libertarianism' is definitely the best solution, though it is not perfect. --Eisfbnore • talk 19:23, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objektivism
Talk:Anders Sandøe Ørsted

message: The top line says "for his son of the same name see Anders Sandoe Orsted (botanist)", while the bottom line says "he was the uncle of the famous botantist (etc).
Can anyone say which is correct?Chaikney 10:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter is correct (I fixed the article), see http://runeberg.org/dbl/19/0480.html . Thue | talk 14:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Son or Uncle?
Talk:KSUA

message: KSUA is the ICAO code for  Witham Field, Stuart, FL  --x1987x(talk) 16:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: KSUA

message: “KFAR, the predominant AM commercial station in Fairbanks, had a format for many years in the 1970s and 1980s of top 40 music and local news and talk.” - How does this sentence relate to this article on KSUA? KFAR has its own page/article. Also, the word “predominant” seems questionable? The first radio station, yes. JeffFive (talk) 23:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  KFAR [[relevance]]?

message: Bill Walley, general manager of KFAR and later owner, had resisted expanding into some of the more contemporary music trends and radio formats which had emerged during the 1980s, and in fact had in part seeded KSUA during its push to become an open-air station. 
The above paragraph presents specific statements and actions of a person, with no supporting sources. Certainty the words “in fact” demands’ a strong second party source. Please note that this removal does not imply that the information is either true or false. JeffFive (talk) 01:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Walley?
Talk:The Fires of Heaven

message: Having recently re-read all 11 books, I don't recall there ever being any reference to Perrin not being in this book due to a honeymoon. I haven't really edited things on wikipedia before, so I'll leave that up to someone more experienced. My recommendation is to just remove that statement completely.
Shattersoul (talk) 22:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: This books plot summary begins at nearly the end of the book.  There is a good 600 pages that take place before the battle of cairhein...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.4.61 (talk) 17:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot summary
Talk:The Shadow Rising

message: Spoilers about the book in question are one thing, but... "and a medallion ter'angreal that protects against saidar and saidin. This last was discovered when Halima Saranov tried channeling at Mat when he was in Salidar." That's not even in this book. I was trying to remember what Mat's "three wishes" exactly were and imagine my surprise when I had a book I haven't even read yet (I'm just beginning The Fires of Heaven) spoiled for me. Personally, I think it'd be better worded that Mat didn't find out what the mediallion did until (whatever book). I'd fix it except I don't know what book that happens in. :) RobertM525 02:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers
Talk:The Alaska Quarterly Review

message: In 2011 a request for a photo was added here on the talk page.  In 2012 the request was removed as a photo had been added.  Recently a 2011 cover photo has been removed without replacement, sometimes with the justification that 2011 is too old.  A journal that has published for since 1980 doesn't require a cover photo of a particular vintage.   Given the range of years involved 2011 on the recent end of things.  I suggest we leave the photo in place unless there is consensus reached here to remove it or replace it with another. Gab4gab (talk) 00:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover photo in article 

message: Hi, Gab4gab: Do you know why the Darrin Doyle page has been taken down? It was up when I added the link (and therefore the link wasn't red). And sometimes it does make sense to add a red link when it's likely that a page will come online.Chain27 (talk) 23:40, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles on Darrin Doyle have been deleted twice via AFD nominations. If you click on the red link it will open a page giving you links to those discussions but I'll list them here:
* 20 April 2017 - [1st nomination]
* 28 June 2019 -  [2nd nomination]
I didn't see the articles so I'm just going by the two deletions with one being just a week ago.  The consensus is that he's not yet notable. So a red link is not helpful.  The purpose of red link being to encourage editors to write the article and in this case it's very likely to be deleted again. Gab4gab (talk) 02:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darrin Doyle red link
Talk:Undecimber

message: Is the Gregorian calendar really used in most of the world?  I know that indians and chinese, among others, use their own calendars at least much of the time.
-Magnus
:For non-religious purposes, yes...  (By the way, there are many calendars in India, with numerous local variations.)AnonMoos 11:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, in fact only 1 third of the world population uses 1 january as new year.
When writing the Undecimber stuff, I relied on the Gregorian calendar page--quote 1st sentence: "The Gregorian calendar is the most widely used calendar in the world." But you have a point, so I softened the sentence a bit ("almost everywhere in the world" -> "in most parts of the world"). --193.99.145.162 17:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: That's the International Fixed Calendar proposal, which has received varying degrees of support since being proposed by Auguste Comte in 1849.  However, it has very little reelvance to this article... AnonMoos 13:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Need I mention the first of Octember? Shouldn't it be mentioned on the page? --HomfrogTell me a story! 19:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr Seuss 

message: Is it acceptable to edit a sentence not because it's factually incorrect but because of an issue with wording? This line in the article really stuck out:
"The "i" in Undecimber is therefore correct, even though December is spelled with an "e"."
It's not wrong, but the way it's written it reads like it is following claims that "Undecimber" is spelled incorrectly. There is no mention of common misconceptions on the spelling so this sentence really reads like it's coming from no where, or like someone edited out information set before this in the paragraph. The problem is the use of "therefore" which is a conjunction meant to link phrases through cause and effect or to show a relationship between the thoughts. Only the thought prior to this sentence doesn't address common spelling errors; it talks about the root of both words. I'm not sure if one should edit for wording since it's not a matter of factual error and might come off as rude. Gildedmuse (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, feel free to rephrase it if you think the wording can be improved. 28bytes (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

text: I hope it's acceptable; thousands of my edits are for similar concerns. —Tamfang (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording 

message: I think Duodecember should be an article seperate from Undecimber, instead of redirecting to the Undecimber page.
27.131.39.140 (talk) 01:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article creation: Duodecember
Talk:Beclometasone

message: Can anyone find a citation about the "highly addictive properties"? I don't think steroid inhalers are generally considered addictive and a quick googling turned up nothing of the sort. Squidlarkin (talk) 07:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Inhaled corticosteroids are not considered addictive. I've removed it from the article. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

text: The article does indicate a rebound issue on skin treatment, which tends to result in addictive continuing use.  The article may cover this adequately as is.  
66.167.61.217 (talk) 20:36, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Addictive

message: Recently, I found that Beclomethasone Dipropionate is used in an Anti-Haemorrhoidal Cream too. In India a cream with the brand name Anovate is used for treating Haemorrhoid. The cream contains Phenylephrine Hydrochloride and Lignocaine Hydrochloride. Chlorocresol is used as a perservative in this cream.
Dr. Dinesh Karia(Talk) (contribs) 12:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Usage

message: Qvar, and other mass-marketed formulations containing Beclometasone each need their own pages to tell, e.g., what are the "inactive" ingredients in each.  E.g., many formulations still contain benzalkonium chloride notwithstanding substantial evidence that it interferes with function of the cilia of the mucociliary escalator for the respiratory epithelium.   
As far as I've been able to find on the web, the inactive ingredients of Qvar are Norflurane and ethanol.
The package insert states: 
:"QVAR is a pressurized, metered-dose aerosol intended for oral inhalation only. Each unit contains a solution of beclomethasone dipropionate in propellant HFA-134a (1,1,1,2 tetrafluoroethane) and ethanol." 
http://www.qvar.com/Document/PrescribingInformation.pdf 
66.167.61.217 (talk) 20:34, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a disaster. Can be discussed here. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:08, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qvar, etc. need their own pages to tell, e.g., what are the "inactive" ingredients in each. 

message: The prodrug beclometasone, which was here. Makes no sense having the two especially since the ester is by far the more common and beclometasone is the common name for it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged with

message: "Beclomethasone dipropionate was first patented in 1962 and used medically in 1972. It was approved for medical use in the United States in 1976." Where had this material been patented (in 1962), where was this drug approved for medical use （in 1972）, and where can we get the info about it was approved in 1976 for medical use in the States (I'm unable to get it through related citation). As for "Beclometasone dipropionate is the INN modified and beclomethasone dipropionate is the USAN and former BAN. It is a prodrug of the free form, beclometasone (INN)." Can anybody use plain language to express, making a layman like me to better understand? Thank in advance for your knid attention. ThomasYehYeh (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need clarification and elaboration
Talk:Self-Incrimination Clause

message: I'm not sure, since I've only watched tv judges :-P, but IIRC in Germany you also don't need to answer questions that incriminate yourself or a close relative. 
If there's one example, I'm wondering about the claims of this article that this is unique to one jurisdiction. Kim Bruning 10:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussions without headers

message: the part I added unfortunately red-links, but you can find can find information easily, just google husband-wife privilege
http://www.answers.com/topic/spousal-privilege  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.122.75.250 (talk) 16:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference for husband-wife privilege 

message: Anyone care to add Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay into the references? I know they said it when they were being interrogated but I don't remember the exact context. 12.28.133.6 (talk) 04:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural References 

message: Apparently this doesn't apply to corporations--should check into this--达伟 (talk) 08:25, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporations
Talk:Pakistani cricket team in England in 2006

message: My best wishes to pakistan 4 the upcomming england tour & in future as well. i hope pakistani cricket team will do better in england.--66.198.31.2 11:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The previous revision of this section had a whole heap of allegations not supported by the cited article (eg: Hair did not inform the Pakistanis of any changes in the field, Hair directly insulted Inzamam and called him a cheat) and editorialising (eg: Hair's actions violated etiquitte) reported as fact.  I've modified it to reflect that the article is quoting allegations made by Inzamam, who appears to be saying that Hair's actions carry an implied accusation of cheating, rather than actually quoting Hair verbatim. Thedangerouskitchen 14:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The issues raised are emotive. Yet we need to report what happened neutrally. That means we need to keep away from implying that the Pakistanis or the umpires are cheats. The facts are straightforward: both umpires believed the Pakistanis had engaged in ball tampering; the Pakistanis strongly refute that; the umpires awarded the game to England after Pakistan did not resume play; some time after the umpires awarded the game, and after discussions with David Morgan and Mike Procter, the Pakistanis made it clear that they did want to resume play, which the English were also willing to do; the umpires then refused to come onto the pitch as the game had already ended when they decided to award England the game. We should stick to these facts. Which parties are to blame for what happened, we do not know (though we may well have opinions on). So which parties are to blame should not be covered in the text, jguk 16:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth Test 

message: As people may note from law 42 of the game, and indeed the official responses yesterday have referred to ball tampering (which is a colloquial term) as its correct name of unfairly (or illegally) altering the condition of the ball. Should we not refer to it as such in the section Fourth test and have a link such as unfairly altering the condition of the ball for this is the more accurate term? --M0RHI 17:42, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd wait for someone with a bit more importance than me to say something, but for now I agree. Nic the Man 11:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ball tampering - the wording 
Talk:Calypso bulbosa

message: As the calypso is circumpolar, the category "Flora of Canada" seems a bit unapropriate.
: Now that there is a distro map, perhaps it can be recategorized as such:
Flora of Canada;
Flora of the United States;
Flora of Scandanavia;
Flora of Russia;
or maybe we should just have a circumboreal or circumpolar flora category. --chris 17:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Roko970 (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Plant-Microbe Interactions Spring 2023
File talk:Round hay bale at dawn02.jpg

message: Does anyone know where this picure was taken?
:presumably in New Zealand.
:But the image shows Straw, not hay. Look at the yellow stalks between all the little green plants. This is a field, not a meadow with grass (hay). --Tom --17:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like Australia to me, actually... Does the uploader know? Deuar 00:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:NAPTR record

message: I think the NAPTR Record is Support in Windows 2003 Server. So i found a Vulnerability Warning for this Server Version. You can found this here: http://watchguardsecuritycenter.com/2011/08/10/microsoft-dns-server-naptr-code-execution-vulnerability/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.79.40.14 (talk) 08:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information 

message: I have some experience with and understanding of the basic DNS record types - A, MX, CNAME, etc - but after reading this article, I still don't know much about NAPTR. What is its purpose, really? How widely it is used today? Is its use spreading or is it becoming obsolete? Should I use it? Instead, this article just has a frustrating "DNS for dummies" introduction, something about telephone numbers on the internet (wtf?) and then delves right into unnecessary technical details and painfully long examples. It even includes a primer on regular expressions.
Therefore, I suggest that if you know these things about NAPTR, please nuke most of this article's contents and write something that's useful to the rest of us :-) And please, stay on topic...
--82.130.38.44 (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert attention / rewrite request 

message: Too short, insufficient information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.203.228.195 (talk • contribs) 
:Yes and no: I agree this is a stub, but it serves well, I got what I wanted without reading through the RFC. If you wish to go for details, the RFCs are out there, why should they be re-written into Wikipedia? BTW, the name of the class should be tyngät ;-) Seikku Kaita (talk) 23:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should convert this to a קצרמר 

message: The article states:
"Several NAPTR records can be chained together creating fairly sophisticated URI rewriting rules. A record can go through any number of rewrites before reaching a terminal condition."
RFC 3403 states:
"The regular expressions MUST NOT
be used in a cumulative fashion, that is, they should only be
applied to the original string held by the client, never to the
domain name produced by a previous NAPTR rewrite."
It is my understanding that the RFC 3403 explicitly forbids the kind of functionality that the article says is possible. I will change this soon if there are no objections.
:A response:
The reference for your point should be RFC3402, section 2, which is what RFC3403 refers to.  The relevant text is "An Application MUST NOT apply a Rule to the output of a previous Rule.  All Rewrite Rules for all Applications must ALWAYS apply to the exact same Application Unique String that the algorithm started with."
So, to be clear, chained rewriting is allowed, but not if the output of one rule is used as the input of the next.
JayDaley 22:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAPTR rewrites 

message: The text speaks of SIP URN which IMHO should be SIP URI.  If it were a URN, it would start with "urn:" and this is not what is meant.
Rick van Rein.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:980:93A5:1:0:0:0:99 (talk) 12:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a "SIP URN"?
Talk:Amigos (Santana album)

message: Maybe I missed something, but although it's in the banner for all his works, I couldn't find it at all on his discography page!!  What's up with that? --Leahtwosaints (talk) 19:35, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this album not listed in Santana's Discography?
Talk:Saul Williams (album)

message: I've heard that it's from a Bad Brains song.  Is this true?  If so, what song? Thanks, Sittingonfence (talk) 00:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample for "Telegram"
Template talk:Db-meta/Archive Db

message: What's the technical idea of a protected redirect to an unprotected template? -- Omniplex 11:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: The text which is supposed to be copied into the user's talk page looks incorrectly formed to me, but I can't pinpoint the problem. GlobeGores (talk page | user page) 22:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malformed text 

message: Question in the title. I think we should name these templates something intuitive. Why not sd? ImperfectlyInformed | {talk - contribs} 20:16, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What does db mean
Talk:VMGRT-253

message: the new FRS will be at VMGR-234 at NAS JRB Fort Worth, I am told. 
---- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.122.66.81 (talk) 18:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  location new [[RAG]]/[[Fleet_Replacement_Squadron|FRS]]
Talk:Louie Bellson

message: "He is one of the few jazz drummers to be considered a worthy rival for Buddy Rich." - Whose opinion is this? If it's the author's, it shouldn't be in a Wikipedia article. If it's not, the source should be cited.
--Prokofiev 11:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison to Rich

message: I'd always seen his name written as Louis Bellson until I came across this article.  Google tells me that Louis Bellson is almost as frequently found as Louie Bellson.  This seems to suggest we need to make reference to the 2 different ways his name was spelled.  Does anyone know his own preference?  --  JackofOz 06:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Louie or Louis?

message: The first movie he appeared suppose to be "The song is born"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.122.140.76 (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  His first movie 

message: I cannot find references to this contest that do not reference Bellson.  Somehow, beating out 40,000 drummers in this contest, which does not seem to appear in any references other than those discussing Bellson, when he was 17 (1941) seems difficult to believe.  Is there a contemporaneous news source of this contest or other supporting documentation which could be cited?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.158.136.64 (talk) 01:36, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slingerland National Gene Krupa contest 