Talk:KITS

message: In the shows section, what needs to be cleanup?
:Please sign your comments with four tildes ("~"). But, I agree, what needs clean-up? - Bagel7 08:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Are you sure KITS left "Top 40/CHR" for "Alternative" in 1986.  I have an old Billboard magazine from spring 1987 that has them reporting as a Top 40 station.  It also has their playlist which included mostly then mainstream Top 40 fair as Steve Winwood, Bon Jovi and Exposé.  If someone could provide an actual date they became "Live 105" that would be great.  Also, a history of the stations programming and format shifts would be useful.
:It happened late in the year...either Nov or Dec 1986.
:I think it was a gradual evolution. Live 105 was pure modern rock by mid-1987.--Fightingirish 16:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Switch to "Alternative"

message: https://radioinsight.com/headlines/121960/live-105-san-francisco-relaunches-alt-105-3/
http://alt1053.radio.com/
Update Entercom has just renamed their San Francisco outlet to Alt 105 as of December 22, 2017
===Old DJs===
Roland West links to the wrong Roland West...some dead guy from too far back. 
Before Mark Hamilton, a guy named Mark Van Gelder filled the late morning/early afternoon spot. He was also the original announcer voice, and in fact stayed on to lend his voice to commercials, etc. even when Hamilton was on board.
Steve Masters pitches commercials now for video games. I heard a spot just last week.
--Baddicusfinch 20:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the wiki links to these names. Some, like Alex Bennett and Howard Stern, have their own entries and have at least some national prominence. The rest are not noteworthy enough outside local markets, and some are long forgotten there. I did laugh when I noticed Perry Stone's link was to an evangelist! I delinked it, since Perry doesn't do morning radio anymore (he's behind the scenes as a program director in Virginia). --Fightingirish 16:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Why not just move the list of bands to the entry for List of alternative rock artists? It's not like Live 105's playlist is that radically different than everyone elses'. I don't like the listing of bands on station articles - it just gets too cumbersome. I'd say a 'just the facts' approach is best.--Fightingirish 19:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I looked up the official Wikipedia guidelines in reference to this article. Here's what I found:
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
WP:NOT
Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed. Wikipedia articles are not:
1. Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as quotations, aphorisms, or persons (real or fictional). If you want to enter lists of quotations, put them into our sister project Wikiquote. Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are famous because they are associated with or significantly contributed to the list topic, for example Nixon's Enemies List. Wikipedia also includes reference tables and tabular information for quick reference. Merged groups of small articles based on a core topic are certainly permitted; see List of locations in Spira for an example.
2. Genealogical entries, or phonebook entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. One measure of publicity is whether someone has been featured in several external sources (on or off-line). Less well-known people may be mentioned within other articles (e.g. Ronald Gay in Persecution of gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and the transgendered). See m:Wikipeople for a proposed genealogical/biographical dictionary project, and Wikitree for a project that aims to be the family tree of the human race. Wikipedia is not the white pages.
3. Directories, directory entries, TV/Radio Guide or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a radio station generally shouldn't list upcoming events, current promotions, phone numbers, schedules etc. (although mention of major events or promotions may be acceptable). Furthermore, the Talk pages associated with an article are for talking about the article, not for conducting the business of the topic of the article. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages. See Yellowikis for a project with that goal.
The list of bands also mildly constitutes original research (WP:NOR), which is not allowed.
I'm sorry for the people who spent a lot of time on this band list (why, I have no idea), but the band list has got to go. Please no revert wars, since this is per Wikipedia rules. --Fightingirish 20:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alt 105 comes to San Francisco

message: Roland West links to the wrong Roland West...some dead guy from too far back. 
Before Mark Hamilton, a guy named Mark Van Gelder filled the late morning/early afternoon spot. He was also the original announcer voice, and in fact stayed on to lend his voice to commercials, etc. even when Hamilton was on board.
Steve Masters pitches commercials now for video games. I heard a spot just last week.
--Baddicusfinch 20:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the wiki links to these names. Some, like Alex Bennett and Howard Stern, have their own entries and have at least some national prominence. The rest are not noteworthy enough outside local markets, and some are long forgotten there. I did laugh when I noticed Perry Stone's link was to an evangelist! I delinked it, since Perry doesn't do morning radio anymore (he's behind the scenes as a program director in Virginia). --Fightingirish 16:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old DJs

message: Cool if I take out the list of bands? It's too much clutter, and we could all add thousands of bands that would make the mess worse. Maybe a sample of five from each year would be better. A better list would be a list of bands that 105 actually broke out.
??? --Baddicusfinch 20:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not just move the list of bands to the entry for List of alternative rock artists? It's not like Live 105's playlist is that radically different than everyone elses'. I don't like the listing of bands on station articles - it just gets too cumbersome. I'd say a 'just the facts' approach is best.--Fightingirish 19:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I looked up the official Wikipedia guidelines in reference to this article. Here's what I found:
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
WP:NOT
Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed. Wikipedia articles are not:
1. Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as quotations, aphorisms, or persons (real or fictional). If you want to enter lists of quotations, put them into our sister project Wikiquote. Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are famous because they are associated with or significantly contributed to the list topic, for example Nixon's Enemies List. Wikipedia also includes reference tables and tabular information for quick reference. Merged groups of small articles based on a core topic are certainly permitted; see List of locations in Spira for an example.
2. Genealogical entries, or phonebook entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. One measure of publicity is whether someone has been featured in several external sources (on or off-line). Less well-known people may be mentioned within other articles (e.g. Ronald Gay in Persecution of gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and the transgendered). See m:Wikipeople for a proposed genealogical/biographical dictionary project, and Wikitree for a project that aims to be the family tree of the human race. Wikipedia is not the white pages.
3. Directories, directory entries, TV/Radio Guide or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a radio station generally shouldn't list upcoming events, current promotions, phone numbers, schedules etc. (although mention of major events or promotions may be acceptable). Furthermore, the Talk pages associated with an article are for talking about the article, not for conducting the business of the topic of the article. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages. See Yellowikis for a project with that goal.
The list of bands also mildly constitutes original research (WP:NOR), which is not allowed.
I'm sorry for the people who spent a lot of time on this band list (why, I have no idea), but the band list has got to go. Please no revert wars, since this is per Wikipedia rules. --Fightingirish 20:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Bands

message: :Image:KITS80s.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KITS80s.gif

message: :Image:KITS2005.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KITS2005.jpg

message: :Image:KITS1999.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KITS1999.gif

message: :Image:KITS1983.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KITS1983.jpg

message: :Image:KITS1983.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KITS1983.jpg

message: :Image:KITS1999.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KITS1999.gif

message: :Image:KITS2005.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KITS2005.jpg

message: :Image:KITS80s.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KITS80s.gif

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on KITS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511170136/http://www.radioandrecords.com/Conventions/con2007/awards/indexFinal.asp to http://www.radioandrecords.com/Conventions/con2007/awards/indexFinal.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on KITS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101213123856/http://www.radio-info.com/news/cbs-revamps-live-105-san-francisco-imports-kevin-bean-for-am-drive--2 to http://www.radio-info.com/news/cbs-revamps-live-105-san-francisco-imports-kevin-bean-for-am-drive--2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:12, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified