Talk:Fabric discography

message: The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. — Moe ε 18:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use criteria

message: *Imo, the discography would be better if it was sorted into a live and regular sections, instead of interleaving the two.  Seems like it would make it a lot easier to find a particular release that way, any thoughts anyone?  Wickethewok 16:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seperated it, I thought putting it in chronological order might be better, but I guess chronological order for the two types isn't bad either. — Moe ε 19:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format/interleaving releases

message: Wasn't there a Fabric CD given away with an edition of the Big Issue at some point? — 87.194.58.250 (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Issue CD 

message: Seems somebody keeps adding FabricLive.42 as Ronan Keating.  I've removed it, seems others have tried also.87.75.165.127 (talk) 17:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ronan Keating

message: General:
 Redirect & Move all albums in series
 External link to official Fabric site
----
Start Rating:
 An infobox
 A lead section giving an overview of the album
 A track listing
 Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
 Categorisation at least by artist and year
----
C Rating:
 A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art:
: Cover Art
: Album Length
 At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
 A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
 A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians
----
B Rating:
 A complete infobox, including cover art and most technical details
 A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
 No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources
 No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
----
Updated:
—ɠu¹ɖяy ¤ 18:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That depends on the article specifically. Have a look at WP:WikiProject Albums/Assessment#Quality scale. For an article to be start class it needs at least an infobox, a lead section (more than just one sentence stating what the article is about), a track listing, a list of key personnel and categorisation at least by artist and year. If it doesn't meet these criteria it should be labelled as stub class, and possible marked with one of the appropriate stub templates. – Ikara talk → 22:29, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progress on the FabricLive series 

message: I request the Unreferenced & Notability tags be removed, since the article has a link to the official fabric page at the bottom of the page. —ɠu¹ɖяy ¤ 20:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You may want to read the guidelines on notability and verifiability. All articles on Wikipedia require at least two reliable and independent sources to meet the criterion for notability. Without these the article may be challenged, and even removed in some cases. The official site is not suitable as it is not independent, although it is a good resource once the notability has been established. Sites such as Allmusic are more suitable and would be acceptable as one of the two sources. Note that user-submitted databases, including this encyclopaedia, are not considered reliable so websites like Discogs are not suitable. It can be hard to grasp at first, but you'll start to recognise reliable sources after you've been using them for a while – Ikara talk → 11:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I could link to Allmusic, but that would a HUGE reference section... —ɠu¹ɖяy ¤ 20:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You only need one reference to Allmusic to help establish notability, once you have done that you can then use the official page for the full list. You will also need some other website, independent from Allmusic as well. I would suggest either using professional reviews or appropriately cited charting information in the article lead as a means of implementing them. See WP:GOODCHARTS for a list of sites for charting data – Ikara talk → 01:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added Resident Advisor to the external links since they have reviews of most/all the fabric & FabricLive albums. Would this be good enough to have the tags removed? —ɠu¹ɖяy ¤ 21:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

text: That will do nicely, although for convenience I'd use the relevant search link; http://www.residentadvisor.net/search.aspx?searchstr=fabric§ion=reviews. I'll add this and reformat the references appropriately when I remove the tags. All the best – Ikara talk → 14:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the  template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:
* http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=53:Fabric~T0
--CactusBot (talk) 18:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Fabric discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160114014339/http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=53:Fabric~T0 to http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=53:Fabric~T0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified