Talk:Think (book)

message: It appears to be Wikipedia editor Ervinn's opinion.  I do not believe that this belongs on Wikipedia.  Thoughts? Good edits, Ervinn. KevinPuj 18:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I stated in response to you on my talk page, this article needs reliable published sources. Blogs and personal websites are not appropriate. If there are no reliable sources independent of the book itself and the author, then the article warrants deletion. —Centrx→talk • 20:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

text: It's not subjective. Are any of these sources eminent persons in the field? Do these sources have any sort of editorial review or quality control at all? —Centrx→talk • 17:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section 

message: Somebody complained to the Wikimedia Foundation (m:OTRS) that some of the criticism / praise section contained commentary, depreciative or laudatory, that did not fit within Wikipedia's guidelines.
:Think! has been critically lauded in well-known, peer-reviewed journals and newspapers as a book that not only illustrates the importance of critical thinking to human progess and democracy, but also provides an incisve analysis of the caues of its decline in contemporary American society.''
Which peer-review journals? One should probably have a bibliography. Newspapers? Which ones? Who wrote the criticism column (a journalist? somebody competent in the domain?). Here we have weasel words... David.Monniaux 22:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edit 

message: :Image:Thankgla.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Thankgla.jpg

message: sheesh, Blank: The Power of Not Actually Thinking at All (A Mindless Parody)] is significant within the context of responses to Blink! So Gladwell got two authors willing to beat up on his BS, and I would say it's not nearly as honorable a situation as that of parodies of Tolkien. 76.119.30.87 (talk) 21:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  if some jerk is deleting the link to Blank: book, I will put it here