lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heathcote-Graytown National Park

message: Can someone fix the spelling of the title of this page?  It's correct in the text of the article.  Here's a link to show that the park just hasn't simply been misspelled in naming: http://www.parkweb.vic.gov.au/1park_print.cfm?park=278 59.167.46.160 (talk) 06:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: , a bit late, but better than never. --Elekhh (talk) 20:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Danggu Gorge National Park

message: The traditional owners are stated as the Bunaba people (no citations in the article for this, but supported herehttp://www.kimberleyaustralia.com/geikie-gorge-national-park.html), which links to the Kenyan town of Bunaba. I think this should link to a new article regarding the people who speak the Bunuba language. Can anyone confirm on this? I'll investigate further tomorrow. Tom Meakin (talk) 15:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Traditional owners

message: I've just added a merge suggestion to Dan͟ggu Geikie Gorge, as these two seem to overlap to such a degree that it seems hardly worth having them separate - but I think it should be WA editors' decision. (Also the name of this might need changing as most sources seem to keep Geikie as part of the name.) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Joseph Chalier

message: I copy-edited the article and removed the notice. Still, though the copy is now clean, this article needs to be re-written by someone knowledgable with the French Revolution. I don't understand exactly how "the Convention" plays a role in this article (it is never properly introduced), nor does one get the scope of the Jacobin's control in Lyons at the time of Chalier's arrest. There are several other things I find questionable as well. Zachkchk 11:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-edit/Re-write
Talk:Klaus Tennstedt

message: Biography here:-
http://www.emiclassics.com/artists/biogs/tennst.html
Thanks; I've put it in the "External Links" section. Grover cleveland 13:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography link

message: "He conducted such orchestras as......"  Probably quite unintentionally it comes across (as a second sentence of an article) as pretty patronising to some good bands and suggests Tennstedt was somehow not quite a first-class conductor.   Not a widely-held opinion.   Why not include his permanent appointment with the LPO earlier? Delahays (talk) 13:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Current version seems OK?? DBaK (talk) 20:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording issue

message: The discography link currently goes to an all-Japanese site that seems to be mostly about sumo wrestling. No time to try to fix it, but maybe someone else can volunteer.
It  might be nice to include a quote or two from some respected source about the characteristics of his conducting, which were pretty unusual (emotional and subjective), and seem to leave knowledgeable writers either profoundly moved or dubious, so opposing views could add a lot to the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.206.22 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: The second sentence under "Life and Career" is remarkable: "He avoided military service during the Nazi era by joining a Baroque orchestra." This could use a little explaining, perhaps. DSatz (talk) 06:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agreesorry about the rushed reply!it does seem utterly bizarre. The worst thing, though, is that it's in the ref! (That is, his obit in the Independent.) So if we do, as we should, Verifiability over Truth, Common Sense, etc, then we're stuck with it. I do hope that we might be able to find, perhaps within the next three years, something which sheds a bit of light on this seemingly very unlikely statement. Best to all DBaK (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Dodging the draft though historically informed performance?
Talk:Mount Field National Park

message: Cheyne wrote about the Mt Field article:
Unfortunately, this article is rubbish and should be deleted and replaced with articles for each of the mountains mentioned, and perhaps others within the Mt Field National Park. There is no "Mt Field", per se, apart from Mt Field National Park. Mt Field East is 10.5 km away from Mt Field West; they are different mountains in the same park and in the same area of high country that is not named as a "range" (although the Rodway Range is a small range between Mts Field East & West). The Wellington Range has nothing whatsoever to do with this area. Mt Field West is 65 km straight-line distance from Mt Wellington!
Unfortunately I am not familiar with the area. What do folks think we should do? cheers,  Cas Liber | talk  |  contribs 14:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is part of the wellington range. This is evidenced by the rock type among other things. Collins Cap, Tressle Mountain, Collins Bonnet etc are in between this and mt wellington. Noodle snacks (talk) 01:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: How to write about the mountains within Mt Field NP

message: * Do not support - we (?) in the tas project try to keep - where possible - geographical features separate from nat park articles - if possible - from what I have seen so far that is..  is what I first wrote.
* However on reading the relayed message - I would suggest that an example might be  West Coast Range is what I did with that issue of multiple mountains requiring articles... they link from it
* Regardless of whether the article is rubbish - I do not agree with deleting - have it - like the West Coast Range article - as a lead in and link to the other articles - very easy to do..
The point is the larger/wider innacurate term of Mt Field NP is what most enquiries would go to first - I would challenge anyone to name all west coast range mountains in correct order from the south - the larger titles broader name is very useful lead in for the less familiar reader...
Just my 2 bobs worth SatuSuro 14:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit conflict

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Lake Seal Mt Field NP edit.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 18, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-07-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 19:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Lake Seal Mt Field NP edit.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Munga-Thirri–Simpson Desert National Park

message: The park has been renamed as the Munga-Thirri–Simpson Desert National Park, so this page needs to be renamed.  Sources: 
https://www.parks.sa.gov.au/parks/munga-thirri-simpson-desert-national-park
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/nov/25/munga-thirri-simpson-desert-declared-australias-biggest-national-park-after-10-year-campaign?fbclid=IwAR1J8PFYtH5bkJCm1KnZL6TEy2Bqltg4S4jrhrjXe0D3gDHVY94nJ_8DAcU 
GilesMartin1945 (talk) 09:08, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Only spotted this afterwards, , but now done. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming
Talk:Library of Congress Control Number

message: See template:LCCN. -- Jeandré, 2006-04-02t11:43z
:And . Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia use.
Talk:Ross-shire

message: I object to this move. Ross is indeed an general geographical area, and I've no objection to an article on Ross (area), however, Ross-shire is the specific term for an historical entity that deserves its own article, particularly as it isn't described in detail anywhere else. What exactly is your argument for redirecting it and removing all the information about Ross-shire? 82.26.197.74 11:58, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I am confused by this article as it says 'former' county. Yet my official postal address is still Ross-shire. Its not my council, true, Highlands and Islands are that, but it is m postal address so surely it is a county 86.163.20.117 (talk) 10:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  County 

message: Wikipedia:Content forking: the landscape section of this aricle overlaps totally with Ross, Scotland, and is also repeated at Ross and Cromarty. I propose to move anything that isn't about the existince of Ross-shire in administration/local government over to Ross, Scotland, with appropiate links to ensure that this artice is found by those who arrive here. Any thoughts/objections? Grinner (talk) 12:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done the above.Grinner (talk) 12:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Content forking
Talk:Pokémon: The Electric Tale of Pikachu

message: Was Sabrina in a coma in the Electric Tale of Pikachu?
Where are the scans?
::Yes, she falls victim to the giant Haunter's Dream Eater. I might scan my copy later. --Guess Who 02:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per request. -GTBacchus(talk) 07:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section on Toshihiro isn't relevant enough to be on this page, and should be moved to his page. 74.70.56.193 (talk) 03:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move the Toshihiro Ono stuff
Talk:Claus Offe

message: the article does need improved, it does not need deleted.  since the deletion tag was at best misinformed, and lacked any discussion link, i removed it.   an encyclopedia with content on contemporary sociology would not be considered complete without prof. offe.   --Buridan 12:17, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have performed a general WP:WIKIFY and WP:CLEANUP of this article. It would be great if someone with an actual knowledge of sociology could expand a bit on the Fields of research section. Also, the importance of the subject matter still needs to be more justified, so I left that tag in. JoachimK 22:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Iytwelepenty / Davenport Range National Park

message: According to the linked official web site the name is Davenport Range National Park, not Davenport Murchison National Park, and it is only a proposal at this stage. Can anyone shed any light? --Zamphuor 11:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name and status?
Talk:Aviation fuel

message: There should be something about the debate over the lack of taxes on aviation fuel and the pollution and distorted prices it causes. ROGNNTUDJUU! 12:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: taxes

message: In the early days of the jet age, it was discovered that jet fuel acts as a solvent of petroleum-based runway surfaces (asphault, &c). As a result, aircraft fueling was soon restricted to a few designated areas, to reduce damage to runways and taxiways (apparently, it was done wherever convenient in the prop days). I would add this to the "safety" section but I do not know if it still obtains. Can another reader familiar with modern air ops let me know if jet fuel spills are still a concern for runway damage? (in addition to the environmental issues, of course).165.91.64.244 (talk)RKH  —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: jet fuel as a solvent

message: Engines like the Radne and Vittorazi can probably be made to function on ethanol. Mention this in article. See here
KVDP (talk) 08:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of biofuels in ultralight trike engines

message: ASTM itself identifies its standards with no space between the letter and numbers (for example, ASTM D910).  Even the page ASTM International identifies a page without the superfluous space.  I realize that it is fairly common usage to insert a space.  But the space contributes nothing to readability or clarity.  I think that the nomenclature by which an organization identifies its own standards should prevail.   75.208.197.7 (talk) 00:05, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASTM standards naming convention
Talk:Rinyirru (Lakefield) National Park

message: Lakefield National Park, Pandanus Park Area.I recently seen a release re waiving of fees into Lakefield national Park.  This related to negotiation by Veitnam Vetererans Group.Can you please give me all details of this waiver, also would like details of Veterans camp site  plua other details of Pandanus park size and location on the banks of the Normby River.From Bob Fisher,  Korean War Vetern24/8 McLachlan StreetManunda    ...    4870QldEmail Address isbob.fisher2@bigpond.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.60.158 (talk) 22:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Park entrance waived fees 

message: I removed the following from the website.
"The so called track from the southern entrance gate (Laura end ) to the Lakefield Kalpowar junction approximately 100km has to be seen to be believed. It is more than obvious from the condition of the track that the Qld Government don't want the ordinary mums & dads & kids to travel this dangerous & life threatening piece of work.
The giant extremely hard to miss bull dust holes as well as the dangerously rough corrugations make the trip there unenjoyable & very harsh on the mechanicals of ones vehicles. The dust from either passing or approaching vehicles is also extremely dangerous.
Bums on seats on Tourist Buses is the go! It appears that this is what the Government wants."
This is clearly opinion and not fact, despite whatever the author may contend.  It's also non-NPOV.150.203.111.98 (talk) 10:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skewed Words Removed 
Talk:List of insurance companies in Hong Kong

message: This list has no Wikilinks.  If these are not companies with articles, are they significant?  If they have articles, should they not be linked? Just zis Guy you know? 12:25, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many of these companies (or in some cases their parent organisations) do have articles. Someone just needs to go through and find them, after the page creator simply redlinked the names as they were listed (eg. including the 'Limited'). Earthlyreason (talk) 09:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikilinks

message: I think all of these companies are significant as the insurance industry is a major player in the hong kong economy... it may be worth while to get people to create the corporate pages for these companies. Maybe even create a wiki project for hong kong insurance?Scrugbyhk 02:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Insurance industry
Talk:Three Islands National Park

message: The geographic coordinates given in the box would place the National Park into an area slightly south-east of Bunya Mountains National Park, far from any sea.
If the nearest town is Cooktown, the distance to Brisbane of 129 km given in the article text must be wrong, too. Wikipeditor 10:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed (eventually...) :) QazPlm 20:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Fortune Battle of the Corporate Bands

message: Without wanting to be cruel to the participants, how notable is this really?
Reading between the lines, it looks like a white collar 'battle of the bands'.  As none of the competing bands have gone on to have commercial success or critical acclaim, I think this is probably not notable. 4kinnel 02:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's notable enough to justify an article.  The contest gets a fair amount of media coverage; was even featured on NBC's "Today" show last year.  (I'll add a few of the article links soon).  But it probably could be argued that there's no need to list so many details about each year's results.  Vandelay 05:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok!  I don't feel strongly enough about it to make it an issue.4kinnel 08:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's certainly a notable topic, but what I want to know is, has there been any negative criticism of this event by those who believe that anything "corporate" is antithetical to anything "rock 'n' roll"?  For example, I can't see the Sex Pistols agreeing to serve as judges for this event.  --Skb8721 16:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Honda Magna

message: the wiki is missing oil type and capacity for pretty much everything listed except the VF500C.
Honda VF500C Magna V30
I'm trying to find sources to cite for this information, and I'm adding it as I find it. - Sayantsi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.188.176.113 (talk) 16:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It says rides depicted in films, not all long rides.Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2015
Talk:Waterfront Place, Brisbane

message: Could someone please add more relevant info such as
*address
*coordinates
*usage
*major tenants
*construction
*owner
*builder
Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 12:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing info

message: :Category:Retail buildings in Australia was recently added to this article, probably because of this sentence in it: "The Waterfront Place complex includes a two level restaurant, entertainment and retail complex known as The Eagle Street Pier." Eagle Street Pier is not part of Waterfront Place. Whether it's owned by the same company is irrelevant. The pier is well set apart from Waterfront Place, it looks entirely different, much closer to the Riverside Centre on its other side. There is no restaurant or retail business in Waterfront Place, and the category and the quoted sentence should be removed. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be potentially a systemic issue. Check the category's related changes link. It appears to be full of newly-retail buildings. --Scott Davis Talk 01:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Categories are based on article content. So if the article content is wrong or needs more clarity and gets changed, then categories need to be changed also.  Thanks.  Hmains (talk) 02:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Retail building?
Talk:Calamvale Community College

message: After making a few minor edits over the last few months I have came to the conclusion that this page is in need of a major overhaul. The quality of the article is sub par and provides an inaccurate representation of the school. I think we can begin to redevelop the article by developing a list of sections we feel are essential to the article.Techhead55 (talk) 11:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Development

message: Allahis71 (talk) 07:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing was asked for, so nothing has been done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2015 

message: Please edit the executive principal information in the InfoBox to Lisa Starmer, rather than Kaine Emberson and Stephanie Lopez (these are incorrect names, not belonging to staff at the school).
{{Infobox school
| principal              = Cameron Macindoe 
| principal_label        = Executive Principal 
Bmbbb45678 (talk) 05:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Stickee (talk) 06:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 October 2015 

message: Please update the 'Staff List' section as it is outdated. Currently states incorrect executive principal:
Executive Principal: Kathryn KayroozCalamvale Community College - News Letter 7/3/14 
Should instead state:
Executive Principal: Lisa Starmer  
Bmbbb45678 (talk) 06:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Per article guidelines for school articles. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 October 2015 

message: The following unsourced puffery and blatantly promotional material has been removed from the article. Wikipedia is not a BBS where you can promote your school. I have further removed the larding in the lead. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed promo and puffery 

message: Cmaci15 (talk) 05:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 November 2015 

message: Bmbbb45678 (talk) 03:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2015
Talk:Rose in the Fist

message: 1.I replaced Socialism with Social Democracy (actually, romanic countries use 'soc' often in the meaning of 'soc dem', as characterised here
2.I'm not very sure whether Libertarianism would be very accurate, perhaps radicalism is still better to represent Radicali in the infobox (certainly, libertarianism as economic thinking is contradictary to Socialism). --Constanz - Talk 12:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ideologies

message: What do you mean with "They're all gay"?! Actually, none of them came out, and there's no reason to believe they're gay. They surely support gay marriage, but this doesn't mean "they're all gay" ;-)
Calliphora 21:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  They are all gay 

message: I see that someone has changed the article, so that it says that this WAS a federation og parties. However nothing else was changed. Has the Rose in the fist ceased to exist?? --Oddeivind (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it disbanded after the Italian Democratic Socialists chose to join instead the Socialist Party (Italy) project. --Angelo (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thank you, I a working on a translation to Norwegian, thats why I ask. --Oddeivind (talk) 15:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I volunteer to rewrite the article in past tense. Any further information before I do so? --Free Socialist (talk) 00:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Was?
Talk:Charles Brooke, Rajah of Sarawak

message: Dear authors, 
I was searching for information, and found a little article about a British what-ever who was a Rajah. How come this, why, what did he do, and so on... hey people this is the XXI century 'common era' 80.56.122.57 (talk) 14:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What did John criticise James about? Someone needs to add to this section either here or in the James Brooke article. I probably learned it before but can't remember. Nil Einne 12:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  John criticism 

message: I am most unhappy that the article name at the present does not in any way reflect his position as ruler of Sarawak. However, that's the position he is most promonent for, and actually the reason why he has article. With the present name, this article is easily confused (or lost) with and among various and sundry gentlemen of almost any English-speaking world. I request the naming convention for titled people to be taken into use in naming this. Shilkanni 04:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the title of the article should contain the royal title. --SandyDancer 02:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All fixed now.--Counter-revolutionary (talk) 22:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently not fixed, can someone help me move this to Charles of Sarawak per the Manual of Style. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 17:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly oppose this unjustified and disruptive move. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 03:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Calm down and please remember to assume good faith. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 11:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Per the agreement on WP:RM (see ), I am going to move this to Charles Brooke, Rajah of Sarawak. Neıl ☎ 11:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: What was his nationality, if not British he wouldn't be allowed to use the prefix sir but could use post nominals.--Counter-revolutionary (talk) 22:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: British citizen?