Talk:Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back

message: Rewrote:
:The film is (according to Smith) the last of his films to feature Jay and Silent Bob and the only one where they are the main characters. As such, it is fairly indulgent and includes numerous references to Smith's earlier films (including the return of many old characters).
I question the bolded language: They have a large majority of screen time  in Dogma. The "indulgent" tag is more a value judgment type thing. Ellsworth 23:33, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the indulgent bit should be removed. However this is the only one of his films where they're the "main" characters, even in Dogma they were playing supporting roles to Bethany. Spookyadler 10:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WAY TOO MUCH!!!!
There is no such thing as too much trivia.
Xinjinbei 23:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: trivia

message: Am I missing something or is my mind just going blank. I've watched this movie a million times (1,000,000) and I'm sure that Alanis Morrisette isn't in it as God, isn't that Dogma you mean? JAStewart 14:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alanis Morrisette

message: how was Willenholly able to survive falling off a dam? 
User:Jordankicksass 3:39, 15th april 2010  —Preceding undated comment added 14:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Hole

message: This movie has a ton of refrences to movies & televison:
*Refrences to other Kevin Smith movies
*Scooby Doo Refrences
*E.T. Refrence
*Judgement Day refrence
*Refrencs to other Matt Damon & Ben Affleck movies 98.124.27.112 (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:TRIVIA. DP76764 (Talk) 18:47, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural refrences section

message: Is there a reason why Good Will Hunting 2 redirects to this article? As far as I know there is no relation between the two. Wiebemarten (talk) 12:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This movie parodies a sequel in the making that Jay and Silent Bob crash onto, I believe. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection Problem

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to https://m.cinemascore.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421115112/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C169884%2C00.html to http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C169884%2C00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100301105949/http://www.viewaskew.com/newboard/messages287/521.html to http://www.viewaskew.com/newboard/messages287/521.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120626183925/http://www.asitecalledfred.com/old/story.html to http://asitecalledfred.com/old/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: How can it be considered a minor commercial success, grossing $33.8 million worldwide from a $22 million budget, when movie theatres take at least 50% of the ticket price? It was commercial failure for all indicators. 46.35.226.168 (talk) 01:08, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How? 

message: With a budget of 22 million, anything less than 44 million box office *gross* is a commercial failure.  BO gross means actual ticket sales.  The studio gets *at best* half of this.
So, this is wrong on the face of it, and the only way to make this stand and not be misleading is with an actual reference to a studio (from Miramax, natch) statement that it turned a profit. --jae (talk) 03:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "minor commercial success" needs reference or deletion 

message: The phrase "the previous four entries" in the main section of the article has each word link to a different article.
What is this, TVtropes?
I believe this needs fixing, but someone more familiar with Wikipedia than me should do it. CATLIT (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The previous four entries" link formatting