lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:Advanced Sudoku.png

message: Well, given that the article is a featured article, I'm happy to take any suggestions for changes to this diagram (it is computer-generated).  I'm rather anal about images/photos, so I'm happy to hear any whims at all.  My thoughts so far:
*it's the only image that contains fine-print, eg. it really needs to be viewed in the expanded version, which is somewhat unfortunate
*it's also the only image that shows a more or less realistic process for solving a puzzle (though note that the bulk of my experience is with a half-cheating spreadsheet, so I have minimal experience with real newspapers)
--Interiot 01:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:William E. Rees

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 22:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The redirect , currently targetted at History of Easter Island has been nominated at RfD. In the discussion it has been proposed that mentioned of the syndrome be added to this article and the redirected retarggetted to that mention. You are invited to comment at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 September 21#Easter Island Syndrome. Thryduulf (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easter Island Syndrome
Talk:Tuco-tuco

message: I wonder if porcupines, guinea pigs and capybaras are the most appropriate taxa to list as relatives of tuco-tucos. Yes, they're all 'caviomorphs', but belong to different superfamilies. What about degus, or coypu?
Number of species: The last edition of 'Mammal species of the world' (Woods & Kilpatrick 2005) mentions "about 85 named species" (and who knows how many undescribed ones).
Physical description: Tucos don't have long forefeet (in fact their forelimb bones are relatively short), but long foreclaws. 
I think the description of the tail as 'hairy' might be misleading. Yes, the tail is covered with soft hairs (as opposed to the scaly tail of a coypu), but not like a chinchilla, or even a degu. 
I know that you've authored many rodent articles (great work!). I research tuco-tucos in Argentina, so I'd like to help. However, I've never contributed to Wikipedia, and I'm not sure if I can just edit the article. I'll check back later.
Calimecita (Cecilia)
--163.10.23.1 21:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some comments 

message: After creating this article, I was annoyed because it can not be reached through the family Ctenomyidae (see porcupine to get my point).
:I created a redirect.  This is done by editing the family page (here Ctenomyidae) to simply say #REDIRECT tuco-tuco.  --Aranae 05:06, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Absent Link
Talk:Ultraviolence (band)

message: Where is this word actually defined?  I've heard it used, but never seen it strictly defined.  If we're making our own definition, that's original research. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 04:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: definition

message: I'm not 100% sure, but as far as I recall, in "A clockwork orange" the term "doing the ultra-violent" means "rape" and nothing else. It's possible that starting from there the term got a broader meaning on its own, but i think in the novel it is used only with the meaning "rape". But I may be wrong...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.176.86.169 (talk) 16:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: wrong definition in terms of "a clockwerk orange"

message: Like other jargon words, the term Ultraviolence has not been explicitly defined in any publication or academic paper as of yet. But that doesn't mean it needs one to have an article (see here, esp. where it says: "Terms which may go without a definition in an academic paper or a textbook may require one in Wikipedia.") Also, the terms ultra-violence and ultra-violent are definitely used multiple times throughout A Clockwork Orange, so citing exactly where the term is used in the novel is unnecessary and cumbersome. 
Apart from the references I've given in the article, it's pretty obvious that the word ultraviolence has widely popular uses in modern times, which I think deserve an adequate explanation in a knowledge source such as Wikipedia (Or would you like it that when you ask Wikipedia "what is ultraviolence?" it answered "It's a metal band!"? Because that's what it did before I created this article.) 
So please take all this into consideration before flagging the article for deletion and screaming bloody original research. Kreachure (talk) 23:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *The article on the band was deleted per WP:BAND. This article is purely original research (for the parts that actually pertain to the word, anyway) and should be deleted. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 08:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: About this article

message: This article has had a messy history and since the previous redirect to the Clockwork Orange page was particularly unhelpful/illogical I have re-initiated the page for the Ultraviolence band (which is the most credible claim to the exact phrasing) to meet Notability Criteria and fixed some disambiguation / redirect links. Please note that further interest in an article about the language and/or literature can be attempted elsewhere and referenced at Ultraviolence (disambiguation). Cheers. Tubusy (talk) 19:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fresh start
Talk:Skyway (Disney)

message: I've added a paragraph about skyways at other amusement parks, since there's no article about skyways as a type of amusement ride (just as a Disney amusement ride).  If an article for that is created, then feel free to move this content over:
:Several non-Disney amusement parks have had skyways similar to those at the Disney parks, including Paramount's Kings Dominion.  Like the Disney parks' skyways, the skyway at Kings Dominion closed in the mid-1990s.  One station was removed, and the other went unused for several years before being converted into a restaurant and a Scooby Doo-themed dark ride at the start of the 2004 season.
--Idont Havaname 02:30, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Skyways at other amusement parks

message: I've read that the Disneyland skyway along with the Eagle's Flight skyway at Six Flags Magic Mountain were both removed in 1994 following the Northridge Earthquake. If someone can find a reliable source stating this, I believe it should be added to the article
Hunter103 07:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earthquake fears 

message: First factbox has some breakage where it mentions dimensions. Don't have the time to look up the correct input format, but someone else might. --81.225.76.189 00:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakage in factbox 

message: Does anyone else realized that the last two paragraphs of the ==History== section were plagiarized from here? |Noone 01:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: When the Disneyland Skyway was ridden for the last time, the bucket contained some of the long-time skyway operators. One was Ernie Burns, an employee since 1970, the last part-time permanent status employee. A Disney representative ceremoniously presented him with the first nut and bolt removed from the ride. Ernie also had the red/green/yellow glass bezels from the control panel as well. Ernie Burns passed away 6/5/07. His son has those momentos.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.74.184.140 (talk) 08:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional History 

message: Hi, I was wondering if we should have the fantasyland station should have its replacement be Star Wars Land. Since the building has been demolished for the new area.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marth The Hero King (talk • contribs) 15:08, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement for the one in Disneyland
Talk:Willie Parker

message: A bunch of info was added by anon (67.176.233.122) that was a cut and paste job from http://www.steelers.com/team/player/49229/ or a mirror of that page.  What's more it's just fragmented data, not even complete sentences or tables like Wikipedia articles usually are.  I'm reverting.  Of course anyone is more than welcome to re-add this info, in a version that isn't a cut and paste (and thus probably a copyright violation).  
Not quite sure about the pitbulls comment he made earlier.  Am I missing something?  --W.marsh 02:45, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of revert 

message: I removed the NPOV tag on the College and Pro career part of the page.  If that portion is POV, please explain why on the discussion boards. Akshayaj 19:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of NPOV tag

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 22:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Frak

message: I added FRAK a new ETF Mutual Fund with Ticker Symbol FRAK, commencement 2/14/2012. Ref: http://vaneck.com/funds/FRAK.aspx?redirectVE=generic HalFonts (talk) 01:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add new ETF with fund ticker "FRAK"  
Talk:Chevrolet SS396

message: The premise of this whole article is a myth. The SS396 is an option on several models, not a separate model in and of itself. For example, see this car.
The foremost Chevelle site on the 'net, chevelles.com, has no mention of an SS396 model whatsoever, and several Google searches, such as this simple one, have failed to turn up a single substantiation that the SS396 is really its own model.
In addition, this article contains other factual inaccuracies, such as:
:SS396, El Camino, Chevelle, Concours, 300 and 300 Deluxe, Malibu (There was no "Chevrolet 300" or "300 Deluxe" any time around 1968, nor was there a "Chevrolet Concours".)
:In 1969 Chevrolet decided to make the SS396 an upgrade option for the Chevelle. (It has always been an upgrade option. This isn't new for '69.)
In the absence of factual backing that this is indeed a full fledged model, I am recommending that this article be deleted.
Novasource 02:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Super Sport (Chevrolet)

message: This statement is incorrect:
:In some years prior to 1969, the SS was considered its own car model, even though it was based on a car already in production.  For example, the 1968 SS396 was considered its own model, not a Chevelle.
The article SS396 is recommended for deletion.
Novasource 03:07, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Its calculated from rounded litre displacement numbers.
Example: LS3 is 376 cubes, 6.162 L. Yet is shown as 6.2 and 380.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.9.214 (talk) 19:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displacement of LSx motors 

message: Should 2014 Chevrolet SS merge to here?  Rjluna2 (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014 Chevrolet SS 

message: Just for info, an email a friend sent me had a 2-min 1963 Chevrolet commercial video attachment which says "four different kinds of Supe Sport garble(cars?)", followed by short promos for
* "Corvair Monza Convertible with the extra cost Spyder option; just right for the sports car fan who is a family man, with a turbo-supercharged 150hp rear engine The Spyder is available on the Monza Convertible and Monza Club Coupe."
* "Chevy II Nova Super Sport. ..."
* "Jet smooth Chevrolet, with the extra-cost extra-glamor Super Sport option" (I presume in several models), ... Impala Super Sport with optional Turbo-Fire 409, with 340hp
* Corvette StingRay, available for the first time in two models -- coupe and convertible (I see that the coupe is split-window)
The quotes above are rough -- maybe not exact. What caught my attention is that I see no mention of Corvairs in this article. The video does not specifically mention the year 1963, but that's how the email described it. I don't know its copyright status.  Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1963 and Corvair SS
Talk:Return to the 36th Chamber

message: This article is unnecessary as there is a far more indepth article under the full name of the album. Krazykillaz 03:15, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is necessary

message: When he finished his work, he said that it took him around 1 year to finish it. But when he returned to town it is said that he has been gone for three years. Does he took 2 years by practiceng with the stone and washing his hair? Or is it only a mistake in the german synchronisation I've watched.77.13.133.34 (talk) 15:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake?
Talk:Fire and maneuver team

message: #REDIRECT Talk:fireteam
this article could be expanded to treat the larger subject of fire fighting. David 03:16, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything, this should be deleted. I'd say merge with fireteam, but there isn't anything here worth merging. --Scottie theNerd 05:19, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When the above was written, there probably wasn't anything worth merging, but now there's some equivalent foreign terms worth preserving. This really does need to be merged with fireteam though. How's it work? Nathanm mn 18:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Stephen Barrett

message: Why nothing about Barrett’s failed defamation suit against chiropractor Tedd Koren? It is relevant to his work. Nicmart (talk) 04:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defamation 

message: It is asserted that Barrett "failed his psychiatric boards.” Is there a credible source to substantiate that claim? Nicmart (talk) 04:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychiatric boards 

message: Barrett appears to be the original source for many references which, according to Ronz via Naveen Jain and Naveen Jain Talk violates several policies. A consistent editing policy seems necessary for both articles. Either interviews and articles are legitimate or they are not. Unless there's a WP:HYPOCRISY policy I missed? --Lawfulneutral (talk) 13:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-Sourced Content 

message: For some odd reason, existing discussions have not been announced here, which is a big violation of our usual practice. There are two major places where participation is encouraged:
* Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Is Quackwatch an SPS and thus not allowed as a source on BLPs?
* Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#SPS and Quackwatch
BullRangifer (talk) 16:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussions about the status of QW (and thus Barrett) here at Wikipedia 

message: Rule 11 Sanctions in "Quackwatch" Libel Case I'm not sure if there's anything worth using here, but someone else may think so, so leaving it here. -- Valjean (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not without more coverage. Applies to American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine as well. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 02:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rule 11 Sanctions in "Quackwatch" Libel Case
Talk:Jimmy Marks

message: Does anyone know if Marks lifted the curse he placed on Spokane now that the case is settled? cda 03:27, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He never put a curse on Spokane in the first place. All that happened was that some racist or misinformed journalists/reporters thought there was a possibility that he did so. Romanies do not make hexes any more than any other ethnic group. Except maybe as a joke to make fun of non-Romanies who still think they do! --Kuaichik 01:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curse 
Talk:Carrozzeria Ghia

message: *Something should be written about Ghia Aigle.Hektor 03:40, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

message: There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is www.team.net. Thank you. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice of Reliable Sources Noticeboard discussion

message: This model was by far the most produced ghia (845 acording to Ford)
Why not mentioned in the article? Maaiken2020 (talk) 16:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghia 1500 gt
Talk:South Lawndale, Chicago

message: Hispanics in U.S. feel pull of the suburbs By James B. Kelleher] Reuters. BlankVerse 05:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the news 

message: Honestly I think LV needs its own page, more history... I'll get working on that. Antihistoriaster (talk) 05:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  La Villita 

message: Many sections and articles about places with odd names include an expiation of how the odd choice came about. “Little Village” lacks an explanation. Is there a reliable source which could be cited? There are thousands of little villages and small towns which chose some person, geographic feature, or other distinctive basis for its naming. What happened here? Edison (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: History of Little Village name
Talk:Alpha Kappa Delta Phi

message: This page has been deleted several times because of copy violations. Please do not copy and paste info from the national website or this page will be listed in votes for deletion and will likely be deleted again. --Dysepsion 03:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I made a couple of small changes - the national philanthropy is actually breast cancer awareness as opposed to funding research/fight against cancer. Also, the sorority flower is the iris, which is commonly used as a symbol to represent the organization.  In addition, the sorority is more Asian American-oriented, not necessarily Asian-oriented (perhaps a minor point to some, but it is a key distinction). --GroupX 04:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment after page restoration 

message: Seriously do people not read talk pages? Enough with this copy and paste deal. This article was deleted because of copyvios before. Practically all fraternities and sororities will let you copy and paste their history from their national website onto other sites but when this article starts becoming some de facto official website for the organization because someone copies and pastes even dates for upcoming events without even tweaking it is just ridiculous. --† Ðy§ep§ion † 06:49, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Violations 
Talk:Ming navy

message: This article presents a lot of historical information, and it may or may not be good information. Nevertheless, it is presented in the form of notes taken during a history class and is therefore not suitable for an encyclopedia. I thought about proposing it for deletion, but it seems reasonable to get some discussion on it before that. The article also needs to cite sources and it needs to be wikified. ♠DanMS 03:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Aquila (Roman)

message: "Another figure used in the standards was a ball (pila), supposed to have been emblematic of the dominion of Rome over the world (Isid. Orig. xviii.3); "
:That doesn't make sense if the ball is a symbol of the globe.  Did the Romans believe the world was round?  If not, then how could they have used a ball as a representation of the world? Comatose51 04:30, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Romans knew that the world was round, that the ancients generally belived the world to be flat is itself something of an myth. The more usual word for ball in this sense would be globus. See picture of coin in pilum article. I really don't know about the role of an orb for aquila, but the Sovereign's Orb has been a symbol of power for a very long time. Gaius Cornelius 07:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Ball

message: Was a particular aquila species "the" Roman eagle, or was it several or even any aquila species? Whogue 01:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which species?

message: I removed the 'and fate' from the see also section because  I'm not entirely sure what it's trying to say.  What is the meaning of it, please? Mon Vier 10:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see now - clarified. Mon Vier 17:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: and fate

message: Pity the article had to end up with a worse title than it had to begin with. Kauffner (talk) 14:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't aware there was a consensus for this or any other title yet, and think the discussion was prematurely closed. Cynwolfe (talk) 17:36, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. In fact I was beginning to be persuaded by spincontrol's argument for retaining "Aquila (Roman)".  Paul August ☎ 21:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

text: There was not. Either Salix alba was not paying attention or he moved the page, after seven days, based on what he saw as the strongest arguments.—Sowlos 09:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't even had a chance to read the new posts arguing for the retention of aquila when the discussion was closed, and was completely undecided between broadening the scope to encompass "Roman eagle" as a general imperial symbol and clarifying that it was about the legionary standard. Either topic seems good to me, and I just want a clear consensus about article scope before we decide on a name. Cynwolfe (talk) 12:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  RM interlude
Talk:Insalata Caprese

message: I assume it would be merged into the big "C" version because "Caprese" is a proper noun - AKeen 04:33, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merge.  --Red King 23:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Insalata Caprese and Insalata caprese

message: Are you sure? This is not caprese. It maybe a simple salad with tomatoes and mozarella. --Ilario 14:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mustard?!?

message: There is an entry for Plum Tomato, should that be linked instead of just Tomato? (Anon).
:Maybe that is being too precise!  Maybe we should have San Marzano tomato just to be perfect?  :)  --Red King (talk) 19:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link Plum Tomato instead of just Tomato

message: shouldnt have Balsamic vinegar.
:Yes, you are right, although you have to look closely to see it.  Can you contribute a correct picture? --Red King (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: done. Placeblues (talk) 00:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture 

message: * I oppose any proposal to delete this article. It is properly supported by citation from three reliable sources as given in the article. The WP:PRD seems mischievous. --Red King (talk) 23:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion - dubious