lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Reza Baraheni

message: Baraheni is an ardent supporter of Azeris ethnic issues among other Iranians . There are many quotes by him that shows he is an ethnic activist and he has a tendency to repeat this kind of quotations in almost every interview . I want to ask if it is possible to include his ethnic quotations in the article . Some of his sayings is as follows :"Iran can be a United States of Iran, a United Republics of Iran, a Commonwealth of nations with multiple languages, but with one or two ruling languages, because the realities necessitate this and none other than this, and any regime that has flowed against this direction has brought nothing but bloodsheds for its people and itself.""Of course there are those that after seeing all these tensions in Iranian Azerbaijan inject ideas of secessionism of Azeris from Iran. I want to ask them: What other group does Iran belong to that has made you want to secede from Iran? Tehran is the world's largest Azeri city, with half the population being Azeri. And it is surrounded by Azeri cities as well, the largest being the multi million population city of Karaj. And if we even want to be realistic, we can even say that Tehran and its metropolitan area, despite its large Persian population, constitutes the world's largest Turkic city, after Istanbul."I thought if I don't learn Persian language,that was imposed to me in a very crucial situation,in the best way as I could ;there would be no other way for me to get my revenge from it .I continuously worked for five to six years and learning Persian language was the best revenge that I could get from that language--Alborz Fallah (talk) 10:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Political views
Talk:20th Battalion (Central Ontario), CEF

message: This line...
:Vimy Ridge (or, as the Europeans call it, the Battle of Arras)
...needs a change.  It presumes that the author and reader are not European.  Also does not specify: Who calls it Vimy Ridge?  Africans, Americans, Asians...? ~ Booya Bazooka 18:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Vimy Ridge was the earliest stage of Arras; WWI battles were often a single "major battle" lasting several months with a number of smaller named battles involved. Canadian history tends to conflate Arras as a whole with Vimy Ridge, by far the most significant part from a Canadian perspective. I've edited the article accordingly. Shimgray | talk | 18:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldwide POV
Talk:2001 Germany v England football match

message: What a complete joke of an article!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.198.187 (talk) 19:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally justified? It was a bloody qualifier, not even a tournament match. It only helped the German team to calm down and realize that there would be a lot of work ahead and put the English nation's arrogance over the top. This game ranks under "Games that weren't that good" but not under "Biggest shames ever". Same goes for the 1-4 defeat in Italy. "Single landmark in history"? "remembered for the next 100 years"? LOL. Boy, who cares about that game except the English? It would be worse to lose to Holland. --84.137.229.134 10:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whoosh!  Multi io 22:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Like the french winning a war.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.153.220 (talk) 19:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why do people have to keep bringing in World War II issues when it comes to international football debates?!. 91.125.116.173 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:16, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone else remember this debate. I suggest unless it can be ratified that it should be removed--Thelostlibertine (talk) 14:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Knighting of Owen?

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_Greatest_Sporting_Moments
According to this (Germany 1–5 England) article, it placed third, according to the above list it placed second - anyone know the truth? Auto98uk (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Position in C4 100 Greatest Sport Moments

message: In the 'Aftermath' section it states that the efforts that England put into this game were all in vain as Germany progressed further in the finals in Japan and South Korea. However as the sole objective of that game was to help the team qualify the efforts were not in vain at all. I have removed this short section. Cls14 (talk) 22:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of short sentance 

message: Some people seem to think that everything that has happened in football between England and Germany after 2001 counts as the aftermath of the 2001 game, and I have removed a couple of additions - the latest was an account of the 2010 World Cup game. I thought I'd comment here just to say what I've done, and to provide a place to invite anyone who adds similar material and ask them to justify why their addition counts as "aftermath". So if anyone thinks the 2010 game counts, please explain why here. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Barbados v Grenada (1994) - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams

message: Well, it is not an advertisement. This is one of the most important project management books and is a best-seller. It was on the "Request" list, so I added it. What can I do to make you feel that this is not an advertisement? I don't even have the publisher or an Amazon link here.... --WiseWoman 18:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Management Book 

message: This, like about everything else in the book, is presented as a story, not so much as a technique or recommendation. I think this is a bit of a misportrayal of the book, which is not really written or structured as a how-to.
Other anecdotes in the book (such as The Black Team) would probably not be billed as implementable solutions, and they are presented the same way. 
(I can imagine a massive niche market for bad consultation to do that sort of thing, though. Team Culinary Consultants, Inc.! Create new synergies in your company with a single night of our revolutionary new team-building techniques!  :) Quamaretto 23:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spaghetti? 

message: The ISBN was missing, so I added it.  My ISBN might be for the 2nd edition. --JadonK 15:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN
Talk:Abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine

message: The article for AZT (the third drug mentioned here) states that it is a reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Does that mean that this page should be changed to read, "All three of which are reverse transcriptase inhibitors"? ... aa:talk 18:13, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AZT and reverse transcriptase 
Talk:Kynodesme

message: This article is wholly nonsense. User:84.9.45.60  18:17, 10 June 2006
*It might benefit from a diagram or two, but I don't know that I'd want to be the one to draw them! Cranston Lamont 06:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not nonsense. Try searching for it on Google. A diagram would be great, or why not a photo? AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to keep the record straight, I'm not the person who wrote the first line about "nonsense"; I was replying to it. Cranston Lamont 15:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah I know that. I was replying to you both at the same time :) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

text: *Just to clear this up I've signed that guy's statement, so you can tell them apart now :) Tyciol (talk) 09:03, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense

message: Restrain from what? Erection? Then write that down! --81.227.72.130 (talk) 22:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't think of an encyclopaedic way to say "flapping around". anemone│projectors 23:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

text: On the article about Foreskin restoration it claims that the purpose of the Kynodesme was to prevent the glans from being seen since it was deemed to be obscene.--Timtak (talk) 09:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Restrain"

message: Could a thing like this be considered underwear, and if not then what type of clothing would it be?★Trekker (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underwear? 

message: Maybe we should get a better image to this article. The one that is already in the article is very hard to tell.★Trekker (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Londonstani

message: I've altered this article so that it concerns the book "Londonstani" by Gautam Malkani rather than the term, which hasn't truly entered into the language (and in fact isn't used once in the book itself).
The book does deserve a page, as it is on many UK bestseller lists.
Vrymor 18:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the paragraph which disputed the sales figures in Private Eye, as no sources were provided for the various assertions. While there may be very good reasons to doubt the sales figures given in the magazine, I don't think adding unsourced comments to the article helps matters.217.155.20.163 19:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales figures 

message: The plot sounds like its written by a 10th grader, seriously needs to be improved, with inline citations. --Street Scholar (talk) 10:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   The plot
Talk:House of Koháry

message: memo for another thing:
Habsburg Palatines of Hungary:
1) Palatine, Archduke Joseph of Austria, 1776-1847, third wife M.Dorothea of Wurttemberg
2) Palatine, Archduke Stephen of Austria, 1817-67, only son of second wife, Hermine of Anhalt, unmarried, no leg issue
2) Palatine, younger half-brother Archduke Joseph of Austria, Palatine of Hungary, 1833-1905, m Clotilde of Kohary, 1846-1927, daughter of August and Clementine of Orleans (no Hung names yet to issue)
3) general (and emperor's grandson-in-law), Archduke Joseph August of Austria, 1872-1962, m Augusta of Bavaria, dg Leopold (son of regent Luitpold and Augusta of Tscany) and Archduchess Gisela of Austria (dg Emp FJ and Emp Elisabeth) (gave some H names to issue)
4) Archduke Joseph Francis of Austria, 1895-1957 (emperor FJ's great-grandson), m Anna of Saxony, daughter of F A III and Ludovica of Tuscany (their children bear Hungarian ethnic names)
5) Archduke Joseph Arpad of Austria, 1933-, m Maria of Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg
6) Archduke Joseph, 1960-, m Margaret of Hohenberg
7) Archduke Joseph 1994-
First Palatine's daughters were Henriette to Belgium and Elisabeth, to Este and to Teschen two marriages
Third Palatine's and Kohary lady's daughters were Dorothea (Dorotya?) to claimant Orleans, and Margaret (Margit?) to Thurn-Taxis. The latter has wide descent: current Prince T-T, Saxony's royals, some Urach duke, some Liechtenstein, and others
the hyp fifth Palatine's (J Francis) one daughter Archduchess Ilona of Austria m Carlow Mecklenburg. current George Borwin, Duke of Mecklenburg is their son.
Czabrag is now Čabrad, and Szitnya is Sitno, both in today's Slovakia. --Vladko 03:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  palatines of Hungary, family of Clotilde of Kohary 

message: The idea was around in the nineteenth century that the family was Jewish, and that ‘Kohary’ was a Hungarianization of the Jewish name ‘Cohen’. See here:
Evening Telegram, February 25th, 1897
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=35&dat=18970225&id=3QFMAAAAIBAJ&sjid=7zoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4414,6138839&hl=en
The article should state definitely, with proper sources, the religion of the family. If this notion is false, some account of how it got started, and how it was used at the time would also be helpful. Even false notions are part of the history of a subject. 88.84.2.117 (talk) 12:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish?
Talk:Land rehabilitation

message: One of the things about this subject is that many of the technical terms are used to convey the same meaning, when really there are delicate differences. One other thing is that within this subject area, themes can be either separate in thier own right, or some poeple believe them to be within another field (such as Land Reclamation or Land restoration). I think a simple explination in the first paragraph (which should convey the overall meaning, or argument in the field) as to how common terms from the same subject field differ (with links to relivent pages) would help. I.E. reclamation, restoration etc.
Kipple2020 15:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placing Land Rehabilitation in the right section 

message: It might be a difference in lexicon between Australian and US usage, but rehabilitation or restoration or reclamation of land disturbed by mining is termed "mine rehabilitation" whereas land reclamation is used for salinity, etc. Again, a subtle difference, but considering the state of the article on reclamation is to do entirely with waste water treatment....some kind of clean up and sorting effort is needed.Rolinator 07:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mine rehabilitation 

message: Is there any kind of difference between terms like land rehabilitation, land restoration and land reclamation? I think the term cleaning up (clean up) (of soil) should be different one, because, as a rule, it is related to hazardous substances--Bioneer1 (talk) 09:30, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms 

message: The intention and context of land rehabilitation and land restoration is identical. -- Kku 12:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: — Assignment last updated by Warmedforbs (talk) 01:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Applied Plant Ecology Winter 2024

message: The redirect Ecological rehabilitation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 05:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ecological rehabilitation]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Henry Harnden

message: I have removed the first paragraph reference to Harnden being a "Commander of the Wisconsin Department of the US Army". This was a change from an earlier reference to him being a commander of the Wis. Dept. of the GAR during the Civil War, and comes from confusing the "Grand Army of the Republic" - the actual army, with the "GAR", the veteran's organization that existed after the war. There was, to my knowledge, no "Wisconsin Department" in the Army that he was commander of. He merely commanded one of the state's cavalry regiments. For a time after the war, just before he died, Harnden commanded the state's "unit" or chapter of the GAR, the veteran's organization. Hope this clarifies things Akradecki 18:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Change
Talk:IRS

message: After disambiguating about 100 IRS links (of which 98 should have been Internal Revenue Service, I changed the redirect from IRS (disambiguation) to Internal Revenue Service. Travelbird 18:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a good move - thanks! MFNickster 18:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the link back to the Internal Revenue Service. The Internal Revenue Service has a richer disambiguation link at the top anyhow. --Endlessdan 14:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Anatomy in the School of Bologna

message: I have redirected this page to the page the material was originally broken out of, History of anatomy.  The text that was located here was part of a massive chunk of early 20th century encyclopedia text that was added in 2002 and has been largely untouched since then, although it has been split across articles on a number of occasions.  Based on this track record, I believe that this text, through its sheer volume, confusing-ness, and inapproachabillity, has been actively inhibiting progress on these articles, and I am redirecting accordingly.  Please discuss this change on Talk:History of anatomy.  Thanks, --RobthTalkCleanup? 18:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:History of French systematic anatomists

message: I have redirected this page to the page the material was originally broken out of, History of anatomy.  The text that was located here was part of a massive chunk of early 20th century encyclopedia text that was added in 2002 and has been largely untouched since then, although it has been split across articles on a number of occasions.  Based on this track record, I believe that this text, through its sheer volume, confusing-ness, and inapproachabillity, has been actively inhibiting progress on these articles, and I am redirecting accordingly.  Please discuss this change on Talk:History of anatomy.  Thanks, --RobthTalkCleanup? 18:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:History of modern anatomy

message: I have redirected this page to the page the material was originally broken out of, History of anatomy.  The text that was located here was part of a massive chunk of early 20th century encyclopedia text that was added in 2002 and has been largely untouched since then, although it has been split across articles on a number of occasions.  Based on this track record, I believe that this text, through its sheer volume, confusing-ness, and inapproachabillity, has been actively inhibiting progress on these articles, and I am redirecting accordingly.  Please discuss this change on Talk:History of anatomy.  Thanks, --RobthTalkCleanup? 18:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:Spalgis epius

message: Unfortunately, it doesn't meet the newness criteria, but who could resist a hook like:
* Did you know that the apefly is a gossamer-winged butterfly that eats mealybugs as a caterpillar and looks like a monkey as a pupa?
It's so bizarre that it might be deleted as word-salad vandalism, but it's absolutely true- and very interesting. I especially like the juxtaposition of "ape" and "gossamer", though it's a massive collision of word associations and ideas of what certain things should be like throughout. Chuck Entz (talk) 01:01, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This would be a great "Do you know?" if it were eligible
Talk:Acrisol

message: This page has appeared on Typo Team's MOSS data-dump as possibly containing a misspelled word or word that could bear inclusion on Wiktionary.
In this instance, the word in question is:
:candic
If anyone can provide a definition, please see the MOSS page about adding it to the Wiktionary site.
Otherwise, if you know it to be a misspelling, be wp:BOLD and go ahead and correct it.
Thanks! Elfabet (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: kandic with k is correct. See definitions of diagnostic horizons in the Keys to Soil Taxonomy Eleutheropodic (talk) 20:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of "candic"?
Talk:Active layer

message: Moved the following text from the article:
* "Soil that will thaw only during a hotter-than-average summer is known as 'Pereletok' (a Russian word meaning "old ice". It can also be referred to as an Intergelisol."
The meaning "old ice" is plain wrong! The russian word for "ice" is "лед" (led, with "d") while here the root is with "t". The word "перелеток" ("pereletok") is having in turn several meanings:
* derived from the noun "лето" (leto, summer)
** a young adult animal who lived one summer (example: one-year a snow that is not thawing during the summer, i.e. surviving "over" the summer;
* derived from the verb "летать" (letat', fly) - migratory birds who "fly over" certain place.
The text is unsorced, and the credibility of the sources cannot be verified.
--85.187.29.139 (talk) 12:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pereletok 
Talk:Contingency/Archive 1

message: "which is not necessary (could not have not been)"
this should be corrected to
"which is not necessary (could have not been)" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.55.205.184 (talk) 01:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in description 

message: Should info be added about real estate transactions? e.g. I will sell you my house contingent on my finding a house to buy within 90 days. 63.239.69.1 20:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Real Estate 

message: why is there a rather random note about a computer game on the page? They use the same name, sure, but then again it has little to do with the actual 'meaning' of contingency and contiguous arguments etc etc. I am not sure of the wikipedia format but shouldn't it be under a sub-heading "Trivia" or something like that? 86.133.247.243 (talk) 13:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random stuff on the page 

message: I'd say get rid of the stuff on contingencies related to D&D from this page, as this is one of the things that helps to undermine the academic standing of wikipedia articles. Yeah, we get a lot of people love that game, but mentioning stuff about it on this page is really not warranted, as it does not really relate in anyway to the meaning of the word "contingency". I'd like a section added here on contingencies in behavioral analysis, and more applied concepts, such as contingency traps and the like. Having that video game stuff here just seems tacky. 134.115.23.103 (talk) 07:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contingencies in Behavior Analysis
Talk:List of American mobsters of Irish descent

message: Does this list really need to be sectioned alphabetically?   I propose removing the alphabetic section names.  Comments?  Thanks Hmains 19:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alphabetic listing ?

message: Why do we have both this article and another article called list of Irish American gangsters ?  Which one should remain and which one should disappear?  Thanks Hmains 00:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplicative articles 

message: Names should not appear on this list unless they have WP articles that attest to their being Irish American and mobsters OR, for names with out WP articles, references are provided in this article that attest to these facts.  Accordingly, I propose to move all the non-referenced, non-article names to this article's talk page where they can be further examined for possible later inclusion in the article.  I will start on this work in 7 days or so.  Any comments? Hmains (talk) 05:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-referenced names 

message: *Removed Steve Flemmi.  He was 1st generation Italian-American on both sides of his family.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.176.232.114 (talk) 21:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removals

message: I just removed several redlinks from the list.  Do not add names unless the person has an article.  If they are notable, and references exist, write at least a stub article about them before adding them to the list. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 22:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks 

message: Im sure he was of Irish dessent 2603:8090:1B08:200:A9FA:7B90:91D5:1EAE (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't bugs Moran in Irish American mobsters