Category talk:Technology

message: Computing is not subordinate to engineering
Computing (computer science and software engineering) are in no way subordinate to engineering. The computing professions are huge. In the U.S., there are more CS professors than all engineering professors. The software engineering page has a long section about why software engineering is independent from engineering.
Remedies: Either add computing on the category list like engineering, or move engineering down into the technology list, as opposed to the title..
---
These category pages have popped everywhere but I cannot see where we can discuss if they are a good idea. Is there a talk category somewhere?--BozMo|talk 13:25, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia_talk:Categorization JesseW 08:44, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: early comment

message: The picture up at the top in the first box overlaps part of the layout. I also think Technology should use a green or blue color, not brown - Also the Blue links look absolutely awful on brown. A lot of this page is also empty, it should be cleaned up to look much nicer like the History Category page. Wackymacs 16:41, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with green, however, is that links are difficult to see on that background.  Additionally, the column list has a little messy formating.  DryaUnda 13:30, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Well, I fixed the column with the sub-categories; how did I do?  DryaUnda 12:44, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout issues 

message: While the picture is nice, shouldn't it go on an article or category about the History of Technology, not technology in general?  JesseW 08:44, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: The picture

message: Over the past few days efforts have been made to 1- merge the portal pages of the 8 main-page subjects with their category pages, and 2- make them consistent with each others. Before making
significant layout changes please discuss it so the 8 pages remain consistent. Elfguy 19:15, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency

message: This might (no pun intended :-) seem a trivial issue, but the gear-train picture caption is incorrect. Mites are not insects.
We could write, 'The creature is a spider mite', or, 'The arthropod is a spider mite', or we could change it to say something like, '.. the "nanogears", shown here alongside a spider mite, can be as small as ..'
I think the last option is best so I'm changing it. Chris Jefferies 17:01, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The mite is not an insect 

message: Technology has automobiles as a separate category. This could be justified on the grounds that some automobiles are not used for transport eg motor racing.  Similarly aviation should be similarly classified because not all aircraft are used for transport eg military aviation and Air sports JMcC 19:32, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Transport

message: Why did you make this category part of the Top 10 category but with an inicial space:
  Technology
It doesn't look so good to me, mainly because it isn't sorted in the T block but instead, in a no initial block. jοτομικρόν | Talk 13:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorisation Top 10 

message: Almost all of the articles in this category belong in sub-categories. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 06:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs depopulating 

message: Add * as the sort order for :Category:Technology. 203.173.186.163 (talk) 07:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: According to the page's protection level and your user rights, you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category sort