lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cricket at the 1900 Summer Olympics

message: I think this would make a great Did You Know. Does anyone know how to do this? Probably no one watches this page though, so I may try to find out elsewhere. Verbal chat 11:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it would, but it doesn't meet the DYK criteria, as it isn't new, nor has it been expanded fivefold from a stub. Andrew nixon (talk) 11:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK 

message: It has been suggested at the now-closed AfD of Cricket at the Summer Olympics that this article be merged into the aforesaid article, since it can cover the events of the 1900 Olympics plus other historical detail, such as the future of the sport in the Olympics. Any thoughts by those knowledgeable about the subject? -- Pingumeister(talk) 12:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is worth it. This is a comprehensive Good article that would have to be reduced in quality to slot into that article. I don't think there is an issue with the way they sit alongside each other, presenting their own information. Harrias talk 13:33, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merge with Cricket at the Summer Olympics 

message: When I see that right then there is no source given for the Scorecard. Cricinfo has one and has there two runs for George Buckley in the first Innings. This would also explain the inconsistency of footnote a. So there might be the discussion to change the scorecard appropriately.--Maphry (talk) 10:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The sourced scorecards have been updated in the years since this article was written, both ESPNcricinfo and Cricket Archive are cited in the article, and both have updated to add those two runs for Buckley, thanks for spotting that; I've updated it in the article now. Harrias (he/him) • talk 12:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrorecard
Talk:Bobsleigh at the Winter Olympics

message: Germany and West germany cannot be separated in single statistics. This is a trick of english-speaking nations to reduce the performance of German athletes. thus, Germany would have only won a single World Cup in football, FRG three titles. So we will separate all english medal from the Time rouhly before World War II because the British Empire was lost.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.166.2.65 (talk) 12:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous separation
Talk:Luge at the Winter Olympics

message: "Doubles is technically considered an open event since 1994" - doubles was always an open event, not only since 1994.--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 11:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Just look.--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 1964 too.--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 11:23, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubles
Talk:Freestyle skiing at the Winter Olympics

message: In the medals table, the gold medals for the USA is way off.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.148.227.250 (talk) 17:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medals Table 

message: In the events table, either women's ski cross was a sport in 2010, or it has only been a sport for one yearTed537 (talk) 23:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Events Table 
Talk:Ski jumping at the Winter Olympics

message: "(Recent information from the FIS offices in Switzerland have had the K-points from 1924 to 1956 determined as shown below)"
Hmm... where is it shown below? I could not find anything. Was it removed? 82.141.124.221 (talk) 01:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

message: The # of participants in the table appears to reflect the number of people listed (probably on Olympedia) for the games, rather than the number of people who actually started in an event. For instance it lists 5 athletes from Sweden in 1956, and while 5 athletes are listed on Olympedia for Sweden in Ski jumping that year, only 4 started the event. This is inconsistent with most other sports' tables, which discount participants who DNS in all events they had intended to participate in. -- Lejman (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Participants
Talk:Ten Thousand

message: The wikilink for Proxenus leads to a stub article about moths.  Don't think that's right. 173.79.75.167 (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link 

message: Shouldn't there be a mention of how elements of the Ten Thousand fought in the Battle of Coronea?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.101.182.161 (talk) 06:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coronea? 

message: "The Greeks elected new officers and set out to march northwards to the Black Sea through Turkey."
Sorry but there was no Turkey at that time, through modern day Turkey, or even better through Anatolia would be more correct way to say  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.61.64.216 (talk) 07:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkey? 

message: There was only one general Sophaenetus, the one from Arcadia and especially from Stymphalia, a region of Arcadia then with a city called Stymphalus as its administrative center. Today the region of Stymphalia is part of Corinthia.  As Proxenus, for example, was from the city Thebes of Boeotia. So, Sophaenetus was from Stymphalus of Arcadia. Therefore, either you say Sophaenetus the Stymphalian or Sophaenetus the Arcadian, you refer to the same man. A note from Greece.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.58.229.110 (talk) 18:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sophaenetus

message: The map used represent the Persian Empire before the end of the second Persian War. At the time of the then Thousand, Macedon, Thracia and asia Minor weren't anymore into Persian rule  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:5026:6400:248A:4016:EAD7:3C8A (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good point, as seen in this map, although Asia Minor was still in Persian rule, except for some coastal cities. Would you agree? I'll see what I can do to correct the map. Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र Pat  (talk) 14:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map is false
Talk:Air–fuel ratio meter

message: :This article is suppose to be about air–fuel ratio meters. The lead of an article is suppose to be a summary of article content. This article goes from the lead, that is vague at best, to other areas without answering the question: What is an air–fuel ratio meter? After the lead we jump into Benefits of air–fuel ratio metering. A lead typically does not need to be referenced (the article only has one) as long as the content is covered in the article. Oops! I think that is missed.
:Would this be correct? A meter would be any device that can give a readout of something it is connected to usually to provide diagnostic capabilities. An oxygen sensor uses voltage that corresponds to ranges that can be converted to information to determine an air–fuel ratio. This would mean that a digital multi-meter could be an air–fuel ratio meter.
:From 1996, OBD II engine diagnostic scanners, that read engine sensors including oxygen sensors and codes, would also be an air–fuel ratio meter. It would seem that, if that is true, a smart phone, with a blue-tooth adapter able to read all sensors, report codes set, erase codes, and having trouble shooting capabilities like the engine diagnostic scanners, would also be an air–fuel ratio meter. Otr500 (talk) 05:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article direction 

message: The redirect Air-fuel meters has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Lithopsian (talk) 13:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Air-fuel meters]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Air-fuel ratio gauge has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Lithopsian (talk) 13:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Air-fuel ratio gauge]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Oregon Route 62

message: According to the infobox, "Length: 83.52 mi (134.41 km)"
According to the text, however, "Oregon Route 62 is 104 miles (167 km) in length.
Which is correct? Does the infobox mileage exclude the portion through Crater Lake N.P., or does it simply reflect true mileage after realignments? 66.234.219.175 (talk) 05:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long?
Talk:Oregon Route 140

message: Oregon 140 has recently changed from Terminating at the OR 62 intersection and now actually continues through to I-5. The Oregon Department of Transportation has a digital video log of the State Highways through it's internet page. http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TDATA/pages/rics/videolog.aspx
From this page OR 140 is listed as ODOT internal Highway #270: Lake of the Woods Highway. when Looking at the video log it can be seen that OR 140 actually continues past the OR 62 intersection through Leigh Way, then right down Agate Road, then Left down Ave G where it turns into Kirkland Road, then to Blackwell Road to I-5 Exit 35. I called Jackson County Roads and they confirmed that the Oregon Department of Transportation has road jurisdiction of the previous roads. Their contact information is located at http://www.co.jackson.or.us/Page.asp?NavID=196  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.131.0.194 (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western Terminus
Talk:Cocos Malays

message: It seems like there's some kind of link from the inhabitants to the Cape of Good Hope, or Cape Malays, and I find a source that states that there was a group that lived on the island called the Orang Cape. If this was significant, and some more data can be found, it would be an interesting addition to the article. Park3r (talk) 01:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to [[Cape Malays]]
Talk:Port Lockroy

message: The article about Wiencke Island says the island is uninhabited, which raises the question of whether the post office and museum are staffed by penguins, or are entirely automated. And who conducts the studies on behalf of the Trust? If there are inhabitants not based on ships, then are any of them present during the seven non-cruise-ship months? --Haruo (talk) 00:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is only manned in the tourism season. The place is unmanned out of season -- 67.70.33.54 (talk) 06:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population?
Talk:NASCAR SimRacing

message: I added a couple of sentenses about the problems of NSR and the status of its maker, EA Sports.  I agree that some of the information may be considered biased, but I tried to be as neutral as possible 70.246.223.55 04:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition
Talk:The Reincarnation of Peter Proud

message: This appears to be the plot summary of a motion picture; perhaps with editing this article can be saved  Subwayguy 04:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I vaguely remember it as a book and movie back in the 70's. I think I saw it on a late movie once. Not very good, as I recall, but a minor hit at the time. Fan-1967 04:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs-infobox" tag
Talk:7500

message: I don't know about the accuracy of this, since the first google hit is a mention on an urban legend website . Not a dog 04:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary, the source you just cited confirms that 7500 is the hijack transponder code! The first lines of the article are about landing flaps during taxi that do NOT mean the plane is being hijacked. I'm removing your tag. -- AirOdyssey (Talk) 04:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thanks. Not a dog 04:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liu Tao

message: Merge. Tao Liu should be merged to Liu Tao, the proper pinyin of her name.--Neo-Jay (talk) 23:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I propose that Tamia Liu be merged into this article, Liu Tao. The topics is the same, Tamia Liu is her English name. Per convention, this article name is correct. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Legislative chamber

message: Agree This article is not truly about chambers of parliament since, apart from a small reference to unicameralism, it is about two-chamber parliaments.
:How about merging this article with the article on Bicameralism? Wameya (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can be tricameral and tretracameral legislatures (parliaments).--BoldLuis (talk) 10:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Yusuf al-Qaradawi/Archive 1

message: Can someone please add to the biography of Qaradawi
: Nothing found yet, except his his website,  http://qaradawi.net; however, Arabic-only, a bit meager for somebody pretending to have something to say to a European public (as chief of the so-called 'European Council for Fatwa and Research'). A set of 160 of his Fatwa's in English can be found on http://www.islam-online.net/  regards,    --Rudi Dierick 17:02, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  biography of Qaradawi 

message: I've the impression that 'Guy' thinks one should believe any explicit statement from Qaradawi, and that one should not analyse it. I believe this is heavily against the encyclopedic method that Wikipedia puts forward. I believe we have to check those quotes, but the  analyse them, compare them withy what's left out on the quotes, and on intervnal contradictions; ....
: Analyze what? You have not even posted a single reference for any of the claim you inserted. Moreover, you want to put words into Qaradawi mouth and speculate. I don't think that's justified. Anyway, at least post your sources from which you are "analyzing" (i.e speculating). I want to see what exactly he said OneGuy
:: Not a single reference?  Keep your lies and pity insults for yourself!  
:: Consider it from the other side: the sovjet constittion pretended to be a pefectly democratic system, in full respect for human rights. So many dictarors pretende the same thing. And do you believe them because they just say so? What I do is not just blindly believing the nice pretentions of Mr. Qaradawi, but having a critical look on it. As a contributor here, you should know that statements like the ones from Mr. Qaradawi should always be confronted with possible inconsistencies, with other statements from the same person, with external references etc.  --Rudi Dierick 16:32, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia requires not just believing at prima facie anything!
Talk:Susan Johnson

message: Is there a page for Susan Johnson, legendary star of Broadway musicals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fshepinc (talk • contribs) 04:54, 22 December 2006(UTC)
Perhaps, not. We may need to create a disambiguation page. --EscapingLife 23:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Helena Rojo

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 03:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The lede says Rojo was born in 2004. But her filmography goes back to 1968. Something wrong here! 86.171.160.47 (talk) 00:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This makes no sense
Talk:Big Three (American television)

message: DuMont predates ABC, and is therefore the third TV network. ABC was #4, and thus was the first successful 4... see the DuMont article. 132.205.44.134 05:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: three

message: Do these networks seriously provide enough competition to the "big three" to warrant mentioning? TerraFrost 12:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The CW and MyNetworkTV 

message: I was just wondering, shouldn’t it be Big 4? Because the Fox Broadcasting Company is essentially a competitor to ABC, CBS and NBC, and the FCC lists it as one of the big 4 American Broadcast Television Networks
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/fccs-review-broadcast-ownership-rules
I’m just a bit confused is all. I’m not very well versed in American Broadcasting standards but if the FCC labels it as a Major American Broadcast Television Network, shouldn’t it be added with the other 3 and this section become the Big 4? MetaPlanet (talk) 20:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn’t it be Big 4 instead?
Talk:Toungoo dynasty

message: *Move to Toungoo Dynasty (following WP capitalization style in the naming of dynasties, such as Qing Dynasty). Badagnani (talk) 06:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As a matter of fact, it's not necessary. Keep this page like this same as other articles, such as Pahlavi dynasty, Alaouite dynasty, Solomonic dynasty. 68.120.227.206 (talk) 02:04, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: I think the map is wrong. It doesn't include entire Ayutthaya, Lanna, Lan Xang and Mong Mao. Per Libermann Bayinnaung's empire extended to the border of Cambodia in the east. The map doesn't reach to Cambodia border.
If the map is true, Bayinnaung's empire is probably not the largest empire in the history of Southeast Asia. It is smaller than Khmer Empire, not to mention Majapahit. SWH talk  18:49, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the map from Harvey's History of Burma (1925) can be improved to more explicitly include Lan Xang and eastern borders. If you read closely, Harvey's map does say in fine print that Cambodia and Annam "probably sent propitiatory tribute" to Bayinnaung. Burma historians of the colonial era tend to be quite cautious/conservative in reconstructing the size of the Burmese kingdoms. Look at the Pagan Empire. Burmese and Siamese chronicles report a much bigger Pagan Empire than it's been presented in Harvey (1925) or Lieberman (2003). For example, local histories of some southern Thai cities on the Malay Peninsula and local histories of upper Menam valley claim that Anawrahta founded them or had control over them but they are not accepted. To be fair, Lieberman (2003) also shows a Khmer Empire that's much smaller than what you now see on the map currently on Wikipedia: It barely controlled central Siam, without any control over the Tenasserim coast or the Malay peninsula. Majapahit is mainly a Java-based empire that included coastal areas of Sumatra and Malaya. Even if Majapahit controlled all of Sumatra, Java and Malaya, which is not clear it ever did, I'm not sure it was bigger than Bayinnaung's empire: Burma (without northern Arakan), Manipur, Chinese Shan States, Lan Na and Siam (Thailand), and Laos. Maybe you can help updating the map. Hybernator (talk) 06:22, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I drew a new map based on the borders found here. SWH talk  14:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: I have seen a lot of people use the term ‘Burmese Empire’ as a reference to the Toungoo Empire, I feel that it should be provided as an alternative name in the page. History of the Burmese (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toungoo dynasty’s alternative name 

message: I have not found any source that specifically state the area of the Toungoo Empire at its peak, if anyone does, please do provide a link History of the Burmese (talk) 00:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area
File talk:Reserves2a.gif

message: image should be delete. violates WP:V#SELF. As this section explains ...blogs are largely not acceptable as sources. Self-published material may be acceptable when produced by a well-known, professional researcher in a relevant field or a well-known professional journalist. simonwoodside.com not well-known professional researcher or well-known professional journalist. 72.36.251.234 05:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The solution is not to delete it, but try to find reliable sources for it. Only in the case in which those sources contradict the information presented in this image, it should be deleted or modified. bogdan 10:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  if popular wikipedia opinion in favor of conclusion drawn in violation of WP:V#SELF wikipedia keep and if popular wikipedia opinion in opposition to conclusion drawn in violation of WP:V#SELF wikipedia delete? they both violation of WP:NOR and WP:V#SELF and policy should not make exempt for site u like - should be all or none 72.36.251.234 16:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Galice, Oregon

message: By inspection, it appears Galice ought to be prounounced [gah lease], but the times I've been through there, the locals said something quite different.  Is it [GAL liss] or something else?  —EncMstr 23:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: "Recently" is a word that quickly becomes outdated in an encyclopedia--the exact date, or at least the month and year, heck, even just the year, are better. Katr67 (talk) 23:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Recently" in sentence about lookout
Talk:Zamość Synagogue

message: Is there such a word as "restituted", which appears in this article?
-- Wideangle 06:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "restituted" 
Talk:World Brotherhood Colonies

message: Added information to make the page well rounded including more independent communities started by disciples of Yogananda. Also, added in more researched information about Yogananda's wishes for the colonies. Took out duplicate information and references. Moved external links in the text to the External Links section.Red Rose 13 (talk) 17:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated Page

message: A half hour ago, this was choked with weasel words, irrelevancies, fan perspective POV, brochure-speak, and pie-in-the-sky: we just didn't need multiple sections devoted to wishful thinking by Yogananda that never actually came to anything, and someone fell into the common popular error of thinking the definition of "unique" being "unusual." There's also a lot that needs to be cited, however unsightly the new batch of citation tags is.   Ravenswing      00:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alright, took a hacksaw to it.
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Yuser31415

message: Category:	2
Image talk:	1
Image:		4
Mainspace	500
Talk:		17
Template talk:	1
Template:	13
User talk:	1194
User:		233
Wikipedia talk:	33
Wikipedia:	310
avg edits per article	1.55
earliest	23:30, 26 October 2006
number of unique articles	1493
total		2308
2006/10 	75 	
2006/11 	945 	
2006/12 	1288
Edit count courtesy of Interiot's wannabe kate tool.--Kchase T 05:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cinema of Egypt

message: I don't know if this section is worth keeping in this article at all, as it is by nature somewhat subjective, subject to omissions, and falls rapidly out of date (currently nothing later than 2008). I'm actually rather included to remove it altogether, but if anyone thinks it's worth keeping it's better as a separate article IMO. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to this, I have just commented out the whole section, pending discussion, on the basis that it is too long for the article, out of date, and it is unclear on what criteria the films have been selected for inclusion. Please feel free to offer suggestions. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:50, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of notable films
Talk:PNC Music Pavilion

message: What should be the standard for adding/removing artists in the "Past Performances" section? Should it be removed entirely? Or should concerts of notability only be included in a explainatory paragraph of sorts? The Alltel Pavilion at Walnut Creek and Koka Booth Amphitheatre articles have the same problem. --TinMan 21:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Past performances