Talk:Cedar Fair

message: Should Wasserfest at Schlitterbahn Galveston be counted as indoor waterpark?DisneyAviationRollerCoasterEnthusiast (talk) 05:48, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasserfest at Schlitterbahn Galveston  

message: Are these "Era" time-periods, truly technical divisions? Or are these "Era" divisions merely colloquial references arbitrarily assigned by CP fanatics? Anyway I am sure we can clean up this whole Article along with the CP business-enterprise Article, when time permits. In the interim, I am still attempting to locate a copy of that publication about CP's racist past as mentioned by another editor on the CP talk page. Based upon what that other editor mentioned about its contents, it may very well clear up many of these questions, especially the questionably accurate ones. With any luck, maybe I can acquire  copy of it, in time for the mass overhaul needed on both of these Articles, early next year. 2607:FB91:100B:2D6C:84D3:617C:5031:C149 (talk) 14:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Era"???? 

message: For JIAcer,  regarding your recent deletion of pertinent information which I attempted to post to the Article as corrections to faulty prior edits. Some portions of the  faulty text were very pertinent to the article, if, and I stress the word IF, that prior text has been accurately stated. But they were not accurately stated, which is why I had posted the corrected information , and included my source references within the reason for the edit, because, as you asserted on my talk page, those source references were already within the CP article itself, so, based upon your own assertions, it was not necessary for me to add those pre-existing refs. However, you deleted my corrections anyway, under the sole premise that I was an "IP vandal". Can you please explain your "IP vandal" reasoning, here on this thread? And also please explain why you don't feel that my corrections were pertinent. Also please explain why the former, faulty information is no longer pertinent, because apparently all prior editors accepted that former information as being pertinent, despite being faulty. What now suddenly changes the pertinence of the prior official legal predecessor names of the Cedar Fair company? Thank you. 2607:FB91:100B:2D6C:84D3:617C:5031:C149 (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The comment was explained to you here. We can use this talk page to discuss article content issues including the edits you were trying to make, but it should not be used to discuss a behavioral dispute that you may have or be insinuating. Take that to your talk page,  talk page, or to WP:ANI. --GoneIn60 (talk) 20:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @gonein60: all of my above comments were in direct relation to improvement of the article. Including any behavioral issues with others,  as you called them. I could care less how someone behaves elsewhere on Wikipedia. But, in my opinion, specific behavior in regard to specific subjects surely belongs attached to that same subject, so that other editors of a specific Article are aware of that behavior concerning that specific subject.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB91:100B:2D6C:84D3:617C:5031:C149 (talk) 20:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The comment, "explain why you don't feel my corrections are pertinent" can and should be discussed here. The "IP Vandal" reasoning was already explained on your talk page, and there's a link to that comment here in this thread. If further back and forth is needed concerning that issue, then this is not the appropriate forum to continue that discussion. --GoneIn60 (talk) 20:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the text that was deleted: "Cedar Point opened in 1870 as a recreational area. The park was developed over the years rarely changing management. The park belonged to the Cedar Point Pleasure Company."  YOU (unnamed IP user) DELETED it — NOT ME — YOU. I RESTORED it, then you DELETED it again. It was at that point that I decided the deleted material (1870 beginnings) may not be pertinent and certainly was not worth my time to argue over. This is the problem that we have had in the past. You can't follow along with how things transpired. I never said the information you added was not pertinent. I didn't think the information YOU DELETED needed to remain. That is why I left your edit in place. Do you understand that? YOU DELETED the text, not I. I never stated that anything that you added was not pertinent. I said the deleted text (1870...) may not be pertinent. In any event, I am not going to continue to engage you. You need to step away again. You are clearly not here to improve this article, all you want to do is debate. You take words out of context, you misinterpret others, then you ask questions and demand explanations for things that didn't even happen.—JlACEer (talk) 22:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  @JlAcer 

message: With the recent Six Flags merger announcement, there is no doubt that the new HQ will be in Charlotte, NC. That info was included in Cedar Fair's press release. Norrisrk (talk) 13:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly there is no debate anymore. Curiously, the press release indicates there will still be a significant presence in Sandusky but mentions nothing about Arlington, Texas.—JlACEer (talk) 13:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Yes, this is all recent news about a merger that had nothing to do with the previous discussion. In fact, the combined company will operate under the Six Flags name, so the eventual HQ move to North Carolina doesn't need to be covered in the infobox of this article. --GoneIn60 (talk) 13:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This will become very interesting in the next few months. However, no pages should be combined until after the two companies merge, sometime in 2024. Even then we may want to keep this Cedar Fair page. I'm not sure what the precedence has been for company mergers.—JlACEer (talk) 14:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We would keep this page intact. Its history is extensive, and there isn't enough room in one article to cover the histories of both Six Flags and Cedar Fair. Worth having a discussion at some point though on how we move forward. It might be best to create a new Six Flags article including short history summaries on both companies, while the full history of each company remains in their older articles. Some smart renaming would need to happen. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Update