Talk:Chloe Sullivan/Archive 1

message: This page needs updating. Chloe now knows Clark's secret .. 209.89.183.89 23:25, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
:the "The Luthor Arc, Journalism, and Clark's secret" needs lots of cleanup... 68.162.249.250 22:53, March 14, 2006 (UTC)
Also, Chloe visiting him in the Loft was not Clarks First Kiss, he kissed her in season one in the episode where those two men have powers to persuade people. Mark Orahoske 07:16, July 30, 2006 (UTC)
:Please sign your comments. Anyway, Chloe and Clark did first kiss in the loft, though the viewer never sees it. Clark tells Lana in the episode Obscura that when Chloe moved to Smallville, Clark was assigned to show her around school. Then she came over to visit him at his loft, and kissed him on the lips without warning to get it "out of the way" so they could then be friends. Debuskjt 15:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia:Tip of the day/May 26, 2006. Debuskjt 01:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: I think the Luthor Arc, Journalism, and Clark's Secret should all be separate sections and they should be cut down drastically. They are three separate topics, and because they are lumped together the article is turning into an episode-by-episode summary of everything that has ever happened to Chloe on the show.
That's not really the purpose of a Wiki article, and I think this article is growing too long and too detailed. Debuskjt 17:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I migrated that information over, and it can now be expanded (I'd suggest rearrangement and expansion into episodic summaries, since the Chloe Chronicles are so small). Done some general clean-up of this article, too. Still needs citations of all the Chlois stuff or that section will need to be removed. Debuskjt 20:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are the citations used for the Chlois section valid for wikipedia purposes? Online fan petitions and fan sites that encourage a certain viewpoint would raise questions about the neutrality of this section. Actual facts and events should be the basis of the Chloe article. The Chlois theory implies that the current Lois is not the legitimate Lois. That's POV, and not a unanimous one. Wikipedia should not become a forum for every theory and speculation because there would not be consensus on what is considered evidence and what is not. SCrews 05:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakout of Sections 

message: The images that say "Kryptonsite" should be replaced with images that don't say it. - Peregrinefisher 10:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We have permission to use Kryptonsite pictures. Modifying the images to remove that copyright image would be a violation of copyright. Bignole 17:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I agree with Peregrinefisher that if a suitable alternative exists without the Kryptonsite image it should be used. And from a pedantic standpoint, I don't think they can copyright screenshots, since the image itself is actually owned by Warnes Bros. - Debuskjt 17:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there needs to be any copyright recognition, it should recognize Warner Bros. and/or DC Comics, who would actually own the rights to the image and character -- and not Kryptonsite. SCrews 04:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kryptonsite

message: surely it's unlikely she'll return, with lois getting a job at the planet next season apparently?
-The Actress has said she is coming back on the video interview posted here   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.247.62.81 (talk) 15:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: death

message: We basically start this article afresh. It goes into too much detail and doesn't come near good article standards or fully meet the criteria of WP:WAF. We should work towards splitting this into several neat sections "Characterization" (covering personality, journalism skills, Lois-isms, etc.) "Character history" (an overview of her fictional history in the series), "Powers and abilities" (should focus on her skills until Phantom airs) and "Romantic interests".~ZytheTalk to me! 15:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring the article 

message: Meteor freak is similar to being a mutant. If you look up mutants from x-men they are classified under species as Human mutant so it makes sense to classify Chloe as a Meteor Freak because that is what she is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.173.228.60 (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mutate, maybe.~ZytheTalk to me! 17:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meteor Freak 

message: The article says her character was intended to add ethnic diversity to the series, but I don't understand how she added ethnic diversity?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.223.91 (talk) 23:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an incomplete statement. Smallville (TV series)#Cast has a better explaination of how they created the character. She was intended to be ethnic, but when Allison Mack read for the part Gough and Millar liked her so much that they changed the character to be white. The same thing happened with Pete, only in the reverse.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 23:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnic Diversity

message: Call me stupid, but how is the character of Chloe Sullivan "intended to add ethnic diversity to the cast."
Blunt: She's white, most of the cast is white. She's not really adding any ethnic diversity to the cast. I mean, she's the only blonde, but that's not really 'ethnic'. -jtp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.211.156.35 (talk) 23:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, stupid. lol. Sorry, you said to call you that. Anyway, the person that added that did not take the complete information. The character was intended to have an ethnic background, but when Gough and Millar met Allison Mack, they liked her audition so much that they decided against their initial intentions.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 23:34, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic? 

message: This statement is at the top of the main page: "DC Comics had announced that they would introduce a comics version of Chloe Sullivan to the mainstream continuity of DC Comics in Superman #674 and 675 in March and April of 2008, but the plan fell through.[2]" However, when I followed the link, nothing of the sort was said in the article. In fact, here's a quote from the linked article: "Will the character of Chloe on Smallville be pulled into DC continuity? Idelson: It’s something we’re trying to do next year." (This article was from 2007.) So it sounds like it's still very likely to happen. So is the statement on the front page inaccurate, or is there another reference that indicates that the plans fell through? -- Tom H12 (talk) 17:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chloe in DC Continuity 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: I'm curious as to why there is no mention of the continuity error caused by Chloe being affected by kryptonite in the season 3 episode "Truth." She inhaled a krytonite laced gas and gained the ability to make people answer her truthfully. However later it is revealed that she was already a meteor freak from an early age.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.71.9.48 (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What continuity error are you talking about?  Where does it say that you can only have one meteor power at a time?  DonQuixote (talk) 02:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Meteor Power

message: I noticed that this article seems to end with the first episode of season 9, and includes no other information.  It suggests that Clark and Chloe are no longer friends, but they are still working together as friends...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.216.26.78 (talk) 22:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Then update it. Just make sure you're brief, don't include personal observations or opinions, and source the information like the rest of it is sourced.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 23:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current State of Chloe 

message: theres an interview with allison mack and she explains that her power is called Empathy.
shouldn't that be added in the information under the picture? heres the video link: http://youtube.com/watch?v=2gwlVxPoS7o  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beachdude0213 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: YouTube is not a reliable source, plus the fact that they generally post copyrighted material that is taken down when the owners get wind that it is on YouTube.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 05:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

text: No, because that isn't what they call it. By "they" I mean the producers who have identified it as just "empathy".   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 03:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

text: You mean: "Mack further defines the power as the ability to heal others by taking their pain and making it her own."? It's already in the article, it just isn't in the infobox because they don't call it "Empathetic healing", they call it just "Empathy" and later describe it in better detail.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 03:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As someone who isn't totally familiar with the character's powers or how they work, why don't we put "Empathy" on the article, with a link to the relevant description at List of comic book superpowers or healing factor or something?    Paul  730 03:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the problem with the name, the producers inaccurately labeling it "empathy" when even their description doesn't match the true definition. You could link it to "healing factor", but I think that there would be confusion because of how they chose to identify it.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 03:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers 

message: The article states that by season ten, Chloe and Clark are the only remaining characters from Season One, yet this is false. Lionel Luthor is in season ten, Martha Kent makes appearances, and Lex is involved, meaning that there is at least 5 characters from Season One.--121.72.203.29 (talk) 09:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is supposed to be the only ones that are still considered "starring" roles.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 20:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Lionel was a starring role in season ten, he was a big part in the whole plot-line.--121.72.203.29 (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No he didn't. He was listed as a recurring guest. Allison Mack actually received starring role credits every time she appeared. John Glover did not.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 23:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remaining characters 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Chloe Sullivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927032039/http://www.saturnawards.org/nominations.html to http://www.saturnawards.org/nominations.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050316180841/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/cult/news/cult/2003/04/29/4108.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/news/cult/2003/04/29/4108.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified