Talk:Sagebrush Rebellion

message: I've added significant history of the key Sagebrush Rebellion years.  My books for reference are mostly tucked away in storage, alas; I had the pain and pleasure of backing Sen. Hatch's legislative aides on the topic for much of that time, having been a member of the Utah Wilderness Commission before I joined Hatch's Washington staff.  
Generally this is an overlooked and under-reported chunk of history.  Perhaps it would be better to put this into an entry for "Sagebrush Rebellion" connected to this entry.  We need to add other key players, including especially Sen. Paul Laxalt, R-Nev., since Nevada was a hotbed of hotheads on the issue.
This may be the most complete entry on the Sagebrush Rebellion so far. --Edarrell 19:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sagebrush Rebellion history 

message: This article is either talking about
# a rebellion, per the title,
# a group of people known as rebels, per the first phrase, or
# a belief system that caused a rebelliion, per the sixth word of the lede.
There's gotta be a better way to handle this. Jsharpminor (talk) 22:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and took a quick shot at it...though still needs work. Third sentence uses policy twice in different context..and there is no brief clean description of which way the "Rebels" lean on said federal land policy (though that is treated immediately in the next section). Juan Riley (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sagebrush Rebels is a belief? 

message: The lede said 30-80%, but it was unsourced. The source now supports 20-85% (19.4-84.5%), so I boldly changed this.
I understand how this could be contentious, but I saw no reverts on this data, and I don't plan to start warring over it. Jsharpminor (talk) 22:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 - 80%? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://articles.latimes.com/1995-12-03/magazine/tm-9835_1_nye-county. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The article says "Among the first pieces of legislation passed under the U.S. Constitution was the Northwest Ordinance," but in fact it was passed before the Constitution was ratified, by the Congress of the Confederation, in 1787. Julyo (talk) 22:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public lands history 

message: * Repackaged under new name Wise use movement
* sources that treat topic as ongoing include
:*http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/2016/05/13/sagebrush-rebellion/30487/
:*https://www.hcn.org/issues/48.2/the-hidden-connections-of-the-sagebrush-insurgency
:*HCN describes three, 70s, mid 90s, Obama years
I will build on this later.
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 21:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did not end in the 1980s 

message: The label might be 1970s rhetoric, but the issue itself is much older.  http://www.foresthistory.org/Publications/Books/Origins_National_Forests/sec13.htm
Hope to work on this too.
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did not start in the 1970s