Talk:Coffee table book

message: This article is currently of the stub class in the assesment scale. Why doesn't someone add the orgins of these books? --Richman271Hello 19:19, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra Information Needed

message: "Kramer also appeared on Live with Regis and Kathie Lee, a syndicated morning chat show that became Live With Regis and Kelly in 2000 after Kathie Lee Gifford was replaced with Kelly Ripa, with typical hillarious results."
Why is this here? it's about Seinfeld, and has nothing to do with the subject of the article. Dallas 02:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Useless content

message: I´ll erase that Seinfeld thing.
82.99.141.110 13:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seinfeld 

message: Someone keeps reverting this article every so often to an inferior version with the above NPOV, Seinfeld sentence. User:Lord Pheasant just did it. Please knock it off, or explain yourself here. MakeRocketGoNow 13:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion

message: Hello quarrelling wikipedians!  I am a cabal-appointed fortune teller, but if you ask me about the cabal I will deny its very existence.  I foresee this article descending into a vicious revert war, and I am offering my services to mediate.  I have read both versions, and it seems like they are two sides of the same coin.  My proposal is for elements of both articles to be included in the final article version, in other words, a perfect consensus.  Reverts do not count as consensus.  Remember, we're trying to create a good article here.  In the meantime, I hope you will talk to me and let me know where you stand on this.  To avoid cluttering this talk page, I suggest we move the conversation concerning these reversions to this page.  This shouldn't be too big a deal; let's not let our tempers get the better of us.  Thanks! Antimatter---talk--- 02:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  the future is clear 

message: There should be a list of some popular/well-known coffee table books, and an image of one. That would greatly improve the article. 212.139.171.139 18:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List Of Coffee Table Books

message: I have removed this image :Image:Coffee table.JPG because it is a book plonked upon a cheap coffee table - not the ethos of the coffee-table book at all.  Coffee table books are expensive, they are for expensive homes and placed upon expensive pieces of furniture, In short that photograph does not fit the bill in any way.  Normally coffee table books  are placed one upon the other to make a feature of interior design - one on its own is never seen. Giano 19:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: corrected One hundred girls I'd like to fuck to One hundred Girls I'd like to pork.
Candyhammer 22:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Throw Momma from The Train" Reference 

message: I thought a big part of the origins of coffee table books was that developments in printing technology in the 60s enabled large books of colour photos to be mass produced cheaply. I looked up this article expecting to see some such explanation that but there's no mention - any print historians out there?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul J Williams (talk • contribs) 09:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technological Origins 

message: It would be useful for there to be a section on a variant of the concept, the bathroom book, which is presently a redlink.  The principal editorial difference is that bathroom books are usually smaller in x/y dimensions but thicker, and full of factoids and anecdotes instead of pretty pictures. The intent, of providing pleasing but trivial, momentary content, is the same.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  16:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: A companion linked page would be Bathroom reading. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bathroom books