lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Funtley

message: The history of the Little Church of St Francis and its stained glass window has been recorded in a booklet by Malcolm Low Malcolmlow 21:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Malcolm Low provides http://homepage.ntlworld.com/m.low1/ironworks/books.htm as a reference for the second part of the Knowle Hospital section. This is not a suitable citation, as it does not back up the claims that straight jackets were often needed, nor that children were housed in a certain block, nor the name of one of the blocks and about the use of double-locking doors. My research on the hospital reveals it to have had a much better regime than this part of the article would suggest.
I would suggest that Malcolm stops removing the tag until such time as he can appropriately cite the claims that he makes! Accuracy is key to Wikipedia, and removing the tag without being able to provide a citation is not in the spirit of the encyclopaedia.
In reply:
Reference to the Idiot's children block is refered too in the Knowle Experience written by Charles Attard in which he quotes from John Burr who worked in the hospital from 1943-1982. The refernce to the straight jackets etc and padded cells was taken from Fareham Past & Present publication Vol III book 14 pages 41-44 written by F. Hoare who worked at the hospital.
I hope this will satisfy the person who queried the information as it is written fact by people who actually worked in the hospital and therefore would be appropriate for the encyclopeadia. So please insert any information that has been removed. 86.15.48.239 (talk)- Malcolm Low  —Preceding comment was added at 20:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfererenced material

message: I have reverted a recent addition: 
#Do not cite your own unpublished research: see WP:OR.  If you really need to cite your own sources.  
#Being a trustee of the town (i.e. town improvement commissioner) implies no more than residence in the area.  Similarly, the place of baptism of children may only indicate the parish church attended.  Funtley Mill virtually straddled the boundary, so that attendence of Gosport rather than Titchfield (?) church is unlikely to be significant.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fontley Iron mills 
Wikipedia talk:CU

message: Isn't CU most often associated with CheckUser? Wouldn't it be better to redirect there and have a hatnote for other uses, similar to what we do with other common abbreviations that might have other meanings? czar 15:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not, the vast majority of incoming links are intended for Wikipedia:Cleanup to which this redirected for many years. Hence, many older conversations, and subst'd templates won't make sense to the casual reader if we do that. Based on standard RfD analysis there's probably a better case for restoring the original redirect with a hatnote to the other possibilities. But the current DAB really doesn't slow people down by much, so I say leave it alone. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 14:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary abbreviation
Talk:The Ballot or the Bullet

message: The Cambridge Companion to Malcolm X says that this Malcolm X speech "owes something" to the famous 1951 "We Charge Genocide" petition given to the United Nations by the African American and Communist-led Civil Rights Congress, represented by William L. Patterson and Paul Robeson. Something to this point could be added to the article. Binksternet (talk) 02:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't had a chance to read The Cambridge Companion yet, but absolutely, Robeson and others had made a similar effort earlier. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[We Charge Genocide]] 

message: I want to know the meaning 45.117.246.242 (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ballot is stronger than the bullet what does it mean in simple words
Template talk:MOSLOW

message: The template needs an article talk page link so that the editor may be more precize on what in the article violates the "Manual of Style for lists of works" so that an improvement could easily be done by a cleaning editor. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 12:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template improvement: talk link

message: Like the rest of the similar templates, this template needs a parameter to choose if it's used for an article or for a section. -79.176.163.19 (talk) 07:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this comment, this function appears to have been added, as  works. However, it needs to be mentioned in the documentation.—Msmarmalade (talk) 04:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article or Section

message: Does this template have a  parameter or similar? If not, can it please be added? —Msmarmalade (talk) 04:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason

message: Please document that |date=... is allowed as well. -79.181.32.226 (talk) 14:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: This template was merged into  on 15 January 2022‎, as per this TfD discussion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template merged to [[:Unsorted list]]
Talk:List of alpine skiing world champions

message: Why is someone listing champions of the future?
Noone is listing champions of the future. They're listing the venues where future championships will be held.
Why this is not a listing of medalists, like for example List of FIS Nordic World Ski Championships medalists in women's cross-country skiing? Some of the disciplines have been contested for a quite a long time, but I think it would not be too large. 82.141.116.89 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Middle-range theory (archaeology)

message: This article steers disturbingly close to the rocky shoals of plagiarism... please compare from the article:
"The middle range theory answers questions such as "Why do we think that this stone tool was used for scraping hides and not for scraping wood to make a boat?" and "Why do we know that these bones were purposefully and forcefully damaged by humans instead of gnawed on by animals?""
And this quotation from a paragraph regarding middle range theory in Thomas and Kelly's 4th Edition of Archaeology:
"Here the archaeologist answers questions such as "Why do we think that this stone tool was used for scraping wood (and not hides)?" or "Why do we know that these bones came from an animal hunted and butchered by humans, and not killed and eaten by lions?"
This is merely one demonstration of a striking similarity throughout.  This article could use a full rewrite.  I would also note that Lewis Binford either needs his own section or should be removed from the article.
-Jonas 15:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism?

message: I've rewritten the article to address plagiarism concerns; as I am not an expert in the field, I am sure the article could use attention from some editors more familiar with the subject. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  23:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite done
Category talk:Lists of companies

message: Shouldn't this be retitled to a List of Corporations or are we still in the 16th century?  Should we be including Mom-n-pop stores in here? A Company is almost slang for a corporation. Or should it be cross-listed with Companies and Multinational Corporations Stevenmitchell 15:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: is still used in the UK, e.g. Companies House. There's also the Companies Act; while companies law includes corporations and partnerships within companies. We have WP:ENGVAR to consider too. So I think it seems OK to keep things as they are. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 07:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companies or Corporations
Talk:Battling Butler

message: Someone removed Battling Butler from the category "1920s Comedy films".  I wonder why.  It's certainly a comedy and it was screened first in 1926.
HandsomeMrToad (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's in "1926 comedy films" already, so no need for that. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see.  Thank you! Best wishes.  HandsomeMrToad (talk) 17:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category?
Talk:Organopalladium chemistry

message: When trying to translate the part starting at Organopalladium(IV) into dutch I was not able to make sence of at leats the first few senteces. Is anyone capable and willing to fix it? T.vanschaik (talk) 10:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks on behalf of (at least) the dutch wikicommunity.T.vanschaik (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organopalladium(IV) 

message: It seems to me that a better name is Organopalladium chemistry and I propose renaming.--Havang(nl) (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better name: Organopalladium chemistry
Talk:Kaliakra (ship)

message: I added the links to the pictures but the pictures are not on Wikimedia Commons yet. I've asked the people to upload them there and hope it vill be done within a few days. Please do not remove the links for the moment!GGenov 15:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Northside High School (Warner Robins, Georgia)

message: Please note that notable former students are only notable for Wikipedia if they have their own article or certainly would have if someone were to create it. One reference to an unreliable web page is not enough, there must be substantial coverage. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni
Talk:Macrocystis

message: I am fairly new to wikipedia. Is this site (Macrocystis) to be kept/ deleted/extenged- grown-up! Osborne 15:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A computerised algorithm has generated a version of this page using data obtained from AlgaeBase.  You may be able to incorporate elements into the current article. Alternatively, it may be appropriate to create a new page at Macrocystis (alga). Anybot (contact operator) 15:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot-generated content 

message: I would like to know why the biota infobox on this page differs from all other biota pages in having a Domain as its root. I would also like to know why there is a phyllum in this box -- is it simply because you had the data, and didn't for some other species (Lion)?  We might have access to a large amount of phyllum classification via ETHAN, to which I have programmatic access.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leegee23 (talk • contribs) 07:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Has been made monospecific in 2010 Artoria2e5 🌉 04:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think, now that several months have gone by since the initial proposal with no opposition to a merge, you're clear to move forward with this. Pinging  as the originator of the idea.  Joyous! | Talk 05:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not gonna be a quick job, but I will try! Artoria2e5 🌉 15:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of ''[[Macrocystis integrifolia]]'' and ''[[Macrocystis pyrifera]]'' into ''[[Macrocystis]]'' 

message: Macrocystis laevis C.H.Hay was described in 1986.  Distribution is now probably by mistake referenced "Abbott, 1976". Schiel & Foster, 2015, , on pages 6 and 13 assert distribution only from sublittoral of Marion Island as like as AlgaeBase: Macrocystis laevis C.H.Hay. -xfi- (talk) 12:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Macrocystis laevis''
Talk:Limp (band)

message: *****Please add any information or update and change where I am incorrect, this has been written from memory and I dont want this great band to be forgotten.***** Smellyape (talk) 2 February 2007(UTC)
yeah i agree this band is very good and there is no information about them in the internet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.108.159.129 (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

message: I updated some of the references on Dennis P. Lockhart. Mwalla (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lockhart 

message: I heard a rumor that the Fed was considering consolidation of the existing regional banks into a smaller number of larger banks. Can anyone offer any substantiation, or suggest a root source of the rumor?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stringbean (talk • contribs) 18:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Rumor, have not heard anything about it. Frank0051 (talk) 20:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fed Bank Consolidations? 

message: The latter 3 of the 4 links under References are to the FRB's web site and produce 'page not found' type errors.
Wayne aus (talk) 02:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References need updating 
Talk:2007 Davis Cup

message: This page is getting kinda long, and if we add details on Groups III and IV, it's only going to get longer.  Would anyone be opposed to creating child pages for each zone, similar to the one for the World Group?  Those pages could have the group I and II draws, and summaries for groups III and IV.  Then the main page could have a list of teams in each zone and group, along with a summary of promotion and relegation.  I'll hold off on doing anything until after the next round, so more people can see this/comment on it. Chris 08:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your proposals: they make a lot of sense. GringoInChile 12:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting page
Talk:Catisfield

message: There is little documented history relating to Catisfield a booklet written by Malcolm Low is available to read in the Reference Section of the Fareham Library and in the Westbury Manor Museum Reference Section.Malcolmlow 20:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Some pictures and information (e.g. population, further facilities, ect) could be added to give more detail, and information on history would be great.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.122.88 (talk) 13:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Detail?
Talk:Barber Pro Series

message: Barber Dodge Pro Series → Barber Pro Series — Suggesting move as this is about a now defunct series with two articles, considering just one will do. User:Willirennen
===Survey===
:Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*
===Discussion===
:Any additional comments:
* Looks like a merge request rather than a move. // Liftarn (talk)
* Yes, I've removed the move template and added merger templates to the other two articles --Lox (t,c) 17:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Any additional comments:
* Looks like a merge request rather than a move. // Liftarn (talk)
* Yes, I've removed the move template and added merger templates to the other two articles --Lox (t,c) 17:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Willirennen has suggested a merger of Barber Dodge Pro Series and Barber Saab Pro Series → Barber Pro Series --Lox (t,c) 17:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment It's been five days since this move/merge was proposed. Since I feel that this is a reasonable merge and that there does not appear to be opposition to the merge, I am being bold and merging the two articles into Barber Pro Series --Lox (t,c) 10:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: * Support I think that a merger of these article is sensible given that they appear to be two different names for different times in the history of the same competition --Lox (t,c) 17:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment It's been five days since this move/merge was proposed. Since I feel that this is a reasonable merge and that there does not appear to be opposition to the merge, I am being bold and merging the two articles into Barber Pro Series --Lox (t,c) 10:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Captain of the Yeomen of the Guard

message: According to Debrett's Peerage and Wikipedia's own page Liberal Government 1892-1895, William Edwardes, 4th Baron Kensington, served as Captain of the Yeomen of the Guard between 1892 and 1895. This is in contrast to this page, which states that George William Henry Venables-Vernon, 7th Baron Vernon, and then Edwyn Francis Scudamore-Stanhope, 10th Earl of Chesterfield, held the office during this period, both were also simultaneously Captain of the Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms. I belive this is incorrect. Lord Kensington served as Captain of the Yeomen of the Guard during the period while Lord Vernon and Lord Chesterfield served as Captain of the Gentlemen-at-Arms. I have changed ths page accordingly. Tryde 15:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Absecon station

message: I've looked at Amtrak timetables from 1994 and the Atlantic City Express doesn't seem to have stopped here. It looks like Amtrak introduced through-ticketing at Absecon in 1994 (see ) but do we have any cites for Amtrak actually stopping here? Mackensen (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't imagine why Amtrak would have a code for the station if they didn't stop there at all. Maybe they had some plan to do so before cancelling the Atlantic City Express. In any case, that link to The Museum of Railroad Timetables is great, because I was able to find out about so many more former Amtrak stations. This one, as well as the other Atlantic City Line stations need much more history, and the PRSL links just aren't cutting it(You'd think they would.). ----DanTD (talk) 14:00, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amtrak service
Talk:Zaparoan languages

message: the article List_of_endangered_languages claim that there's only 1 speaker, yet in this article the number is 700. One must be terribly wrong.. 85.107.24.155 15:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gill

message: I'll clean this article up starting on June 5th (after my exams) unless someone else has time to do it before then. We need a clear definition of gill followed by full discussion of the variety of form and function that exists. Especially a description of gill function from micro to macro level and description of the range from simplicity to complexity represented by gill types. I'll knock up some diagrams of the most common gill structures and features, and think about the structure of the article. Blahah (talk) 16:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would it be possible to transplant gills into the human body to enable them to breathe underwater? no u retard —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.182.58 (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gills on humans? 

message: The list goes as follows:
"Aquatic respiration
Book lung
Fish gill
Gill raker
Gill slit
Lung
Artificial gills (human)"
Could anyone please tell me if "Artificial gills (human)" should come after "Aquatic respiration" instead? (Edit: Added spaces and links to list and capitalized quoted list entries.)--Thylacine24 (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the "See also" section be alphabetized? 

message: In the history section, it's mentioned that (purportedly) Pliny the Elder and others at the time knew that gills were used in respiration, but that Aristotle disagreed. The cited work, Cyclopaedia, doesn't state this: a digital search of the work only turned up "Pliny the Elder" on one page (http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/HistSciTech/HistSciTech-idx?type=turn&id=HistSciTech.CycloSupple02&entity=HistSciTech.CycloSupple02.p0285&q1=gills), which does mention gills and respiration, but never any story that Aristotle refuted the idea of that use. If someone can locate a source on that story, please add a new citation; if not, it probably shouldn't be mentioned.Etymographer (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pliny and Aristotle on Gill Respiration
Talk:Reward website

message: There seems to an overlap between a Reward Website and a  Cashback Website.
Maybe they could be merged, but from what I see they can mean very different things. A Reward Website could mean anything - a site that pays for you to complete surveys, pays for you to register for other sites, pays for many other actions
A Cashback Website refers very specifically to those that you shop through to get some cash returned. 
Some parts of this article, like the 'Reward rate comparison', might be better suited to the Cashback Websites article with this article being a more general description. Identz 16:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reward Website vs Cashback Website 

message: I have added an external link. It is only for the UK as I could not find anything else. --Abdulha (talk) 20:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External link
Talk:Angela Buxton

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.  Diannaa (talk) 20:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:List of Australian Open mixed doubles champions

message: There are conflicting data on 1960 finalists in different sources. While some (including AO own website) list Christine Truman and Martin Mulligan as finalists, others (including Bud Collins' Encyclopedia of Tennis) list Mary Carter Reitano and Bob Mark. It seems like the latter are correct: here we have detailed draw, and it shows that Truman and Mulligan lost in semis rather than in the final, and with a completely different score. I intend to fix the table unless somebody provides an alternative draw showing that Truman and Mulligan indeed played in the finals. Deinocheirus (talk) 22:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1960 final