Talk:Władysław II Jagiełło/Archive 3

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
:*Support (nominator) --Francis Schonken 13:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support.  (Although how did it get here to begin with?) john k 14:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *:Tx for asking, my error: I had erroneously copied your choice as Wladyslaw Jagiello of Poland (which was in fact someone else's choice, and as I discovered later in the process *ambiguous*, see Ladislas Jagello). Anyway, then Maed moved the page there, then I did double redirect cleanup, then in the end I discovered the ambiguity, then I went back to check what your first choice was, then I moved to Wladyslaw II Jagiello of Poland and did the cleanup, then Maed moved again and made moving back impossible, then I moved to the nearest to your choice "still available" for non-sysop move, and started WP:RM. --Francis Schonken 14:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Support.  My 1979 Encyclopedia Brittanica, in the "Jagiellon dynasty" listing, shows the name as Władysław II Jagielło of Poland (with diacritics), but I prefer non-diacritic article titles on Wikipedia anyway. --Elonka 17:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: * Oppose to of Poland. There was a Union of Poland and Lithuania, see Krewo Union. Juraune 20:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose. Appleseed (Talk) 20:03, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose per Juraune, and also I see no reason why not to use diactrics. Besides this vote is now out of context, as the article was moved from the original Władysław II Jagiełło.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Support Sensible. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 20:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose. ObRoy 21:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose.  KonradWallenrod 04:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose.  Mattergy 05:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose. Szopen 07:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: or to Wladyslaw Jagiello of Lithuania, King of Poland.  Rationale: His regnal number of Poland varies in various sources, being either V or II. Lithuania is, for several reasons, an important element to be mentioned in his article name. ObRoy 14:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support M.K. 15:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Support more than Wladyslaw Jagiello of Poland. Poland and Lithuania formed a Union. Juraune 17:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose.  This is a very odd article title. Appleseed (Talk) 20:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose per Appleseed, and also I see no reason why not to use diactrics. I do agree with Juranune that this version is somewhat more correct then the one proposed above, but the best solution is to avoid mentioning all nations altogether. Besides this vote is now out of context, as the article was moved from the original Władysław II Jagiełło.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose Weird. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 20:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose.  KonradWallenrod 04:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose.  Mattergy 05:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose. Szopen 07:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative 2

message: or to Jagiello. Rationale as presented by Smec (see below).
:*Support. ObRoy 20:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Oppose.  This is reminiscent of Jogaila, but I don't think it's very common. Appleseed (Talk) 20:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose Even weirder. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 20:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Support. Srnec 01:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Support.  Seems like a simple solution to a controversial problem.  How many other encyclopedic persons called simply Jagiello are there?  H Padleckas 02:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose.  KonradWallenrod 04:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Oppose.  Mattergy 05:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Neutral Szopen 07:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative 3

message: to the original name but without confusing diatrics, also used by EB Wladyslaw II Jagiello
:*Support. Szopen 07:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative 4

message: to Wladislaus II of Poland
:*'Support Szopen 07:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative 5