lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:I Never Told You What I Do for a Living

message: I it just me, or are the lyrics of the song on Life on the Murder seen different from those of 3Cheers4sweetrevenge? If so, I think it should be noted. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 14:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's because the version on LOTMS is a demo. It was the version they originally played live before 3 Cheers was released, but look at the lyrics - they didn't make sense. So Howard Benson (the producer) had them rewrite it, so they did, and it's a much better song that makes a LOT more sense. MJB12 07:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I think the interview you're referring to might be one on LOTMS. I remember the interview, and if it isn't on there, it might have been an AOL Exclusive or Yahoo! Music interview. Estrual 19:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Adam Eckersley

message: If anybody can find a published citation of this, it would be nice to add: despite being sent off on his Port Vale début against us, Adam Eckersley was named "man of the match".  Hassocks5489 15:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Port Vale début 
Talk:Adam Ferrara

message: He was in Mall Cop  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.168.63.224 (talk) 04:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: P hes also very sexy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.161.90 (talk) 17:32, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone should make this minor update- 
Talk:I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus

message: 1. Included recording date (July 1952), and moved the previous Reference 1 to source the date.
2. Jimmy Boyd turned 13 on 9 Jan 1952, thus the song was recorded when he was 13. Added this to intro.
Guyburns (talk) 14:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Why are the lyrics missing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 22:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics?
Talk:Adam Freier

message: Freier's 'Playing career' has not been updated since 2007. Please help if you can.
wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 22:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Australian reported (September 2010): "Freier has only played half a dozen games since sustaining his back injury in 2008." He was with the Waratahs in 2010 (e.g. seehttp://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/union-news/injuryhit-tahs-set-to-rush-back-freier-20100423-tj5p.html) wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 10:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Playing career

message: What is Adam Freier's nickname?
Mark Gerrard said: "... old Hasselhoff, in red speedos, that's what we call him." And also: "little bull-ant". (Ref Rebels video Mark Gerrard previews the Waratahs clash wcrosbie (talk), Melbourne, Australia 22:33, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname
Talk:Italo-Normans

message: I note the article refers to two terms, Siculo-Norman and Italo-Norman as equivalents, but appears to have a preference for using Italo-Norman.  This seems unusual given it was known as the Kingdom of Sicily.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.211.33 (talk) 11:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Italo-Norman
Talk:I Saw Three Ships

message: I've been pondering this song for the past few days, and my sister mentioned that Camels have been referred to as "ships of the desert" -- this would be a much more likely explanation.  I googled "camel ships desert" and found a lot of supporting references.  I don't have the time to write it up, but I think this worth including as one probable interpretation of the song.
Merry Christmas!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.185.243 (talk) 12:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's an interesting idea. I never thought of that before. I'll definitely try to look into that. Thanks! Oldiesmann (talk) 23:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ships = Camels? 

message: The melody in the ogg file isn't right. Please compare the melody of this song with the melody in the ogg file. In the first and third lines, "I saw three ships come sailing in", all notes except "ships" and "in" are correct. In the second line, "On Christmas Day, on Christmas Day", only the final "Day" is correct. On the fourth line, only the last syllable of "morning" is correct. Georgia guy (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melody in .ogg file
Talk:Adam Goldberg (actor)

message: He played Eddie on Friends during season 2.IamCool316 01:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddie 

message: I have removed this:
On August 28, 2001, actress Natasha Lyonne was arrested by Miami Beach police after hitting a road sign with her rented Dodge and trying to flee the scene. An officer who witnessed the incident said Lyonne refused to take a breathalyzer test and told him, "I'm a movie star. Can I talk to my entertainment lawyer?" Goldberg was riding in the car at the time. Lyonne later pled guilty to driving under the influence and received six months of probation and 50 hours of community service. No charges were filed against Goldberg. 
per WP:BLP. No source and nothing to indicate that he was anything more than a passanger in a pulled over car. In other words: We are not a tabloid. EconomicsGuy 11:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:BLP]]

message: *Following Gurdian UK interview with Adam Goldberg. Some information about working with his ex girlfriends, heritage.  http://film.guardian.co.uk/interview/interviewpages/0,,2160068,00.html AtaruMoroboshi 14:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Source 

message: Who is Julian Waksal?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.202.118.5 (talk) 16:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julian Waksal
Talk:2006 FIBA World Championship

message: Wouldn't 2006 Basketball World Championship be more appropriate for the title? Just as 2006 FIFA World Cup and 2006 Winter Olympics. Or is there a different naming convention? --Tone 08:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think it should be moved to 2006 FIBA World Championships. That's what it's called on the official FIBA webiste. Andrius  14:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The official name which arguably is the most common formal name is probably the best in this instance. While the Winter Olympics is different, I'm not sure how the 2006 FIFA World Cup fits in to you're suggestion. It is the official name. More informally it is far more often referred to as just the World Cup. If we want to refer to the sport, it would be the Football World Cup. So really, the FIFA World Cup example is similar in some ways to the FIBA World Championship name. Nil Einne 11:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: In my opinion the group tables would look better without the tiebreaker give within the table itself. Add the tiebreaker summary underneath it? Theasfl 21:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the criteria should be covered before, and a simple * linking to a comment at the end of the table would be better. Don't you think? And this not only for the group A. Mariano(t/c) 07:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: anything probably works better than the added cells in the group tables Theasfl 03:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Perhaps, but the current format with 5 lines at the headers is horrible. Perhaps we could widen the 2 extra columns for the header to fit less lines. I'll try that. Mariano(t/c) 16:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The tiebreaker rules themselves were explained in the opening paragraph, giving the numbers underneath the table and referring back to that would be more effective than the current method. 132.170.41.154 12:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiebreaker Format 

message: no point for having a page devoted to the finals, can be easier to have it on the main page as a subheading Luis Santos24 (talk) 11:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[2006 FIBA World Championship Final]]
Talk:Adam Green (musician)

message: There is an album (Gemstones) missing from the discography for this artist, which currenty runs "garfield; friends of mine; jacket full of danger". I don't know how to edit to add images etc so have not edited the page, but could somebody please clear this up? The article, looking at it now, actually reads as if the album Gemstones (which falls historically between Friends Of Mine and Jacket Full Of Danger) has been intentionally omitted, though I can't think of a reason for this to be the case. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.211.102.231 (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  discography 
Talk:Adam Haslett

message: What's the source for the fact that he's working on his first novel currently?  I haven't seen any recent interviews with him.  AniBunny (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Calculus of negligence

message: This description while accurate enough is arcane and likely to leave the reader under the impression that negligence standards involve calculations of risk/benefit on the fly. 
In real life, most negligence claims arise out of varying degrees, not of calculation, but of thoughtlessness; and the judge will instruct the jury that the plaintiff prevails if he/she proved that the defendant failed to use "ordinary care" under the circumstances. That duty, in turn, is usually described as "that degree of care which an ordinarily careful person would have used under the same or similar circumstances."  Not a terribly precise formula, to be sure, but one that entrusts juries to do what they do best:  apply their common sense to a unique situation.
A further problem with the description given is that it hints that the common law of the US is as pronounced by Justice Hand.  The Supreme Court long ago abandoned deciding the common law of the states and left that up to the highest courts of the several states.  Common law negligence today is defined in the states by state courts.  It also has many corrollaries not mentioned here, such as that the violation of a statutory duty of care is at least prima facie evidence of negligence [as with speed limits] or [as with gun safety laws] is negligence per se, i.e., negligence as a matter of law, and further proof is unnecessary.
----
This article appears to be meant specifically to discuss Learned Hand's calculus of negligence. A more general discussion of negligence can be found elsewhere (Negligence).
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.239.160.126 (talk) 01:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Adam Herz

message: Hello
 I called subversive comedy script.
 I'm willing to sell it.
Selling  only to the author of the film American Pie (adam herz)
Email: navid.sheini1361@gmail.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.144.208.50 (talk) 17:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  help
Talk:I Think I Love You

message: Je cherche après Titine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jv1D_KtALdQ  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.194.196 (talk) 04:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a hard time believing this to be an original 

message: of additional singers.  It looked like this:
:"Background vocals on this, and all other Partridge Family recordings, were provided by veteran session singers: Ron Hicklin, John Bahler, Tom Bahler, and Jackie Ward."
While this might be true it was added to a section that was referenced and these names are not in that reference.  So if these names are to be added back there needs to be a reference for them.  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:28, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that Jackie Ward has an article here under Robin Ward (singer) that mentions her work for the Partridge Family.  Unfortunately that text is not referenced either.  I suspect something will show up.  I wonder what happen if I do wikilinks for the others,  Ron Hicklin, John Bahler, Tom Bahler? Hummmm.  A lot of blue links.  Carptrash (talk) 15:34, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: These names are so verified by a variety of wikipedia articles that I think I'll put them back in the article - revert my undo.  Life is supposed to be interesting. Carptrash (talk) 15:38, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone added a list 
Talk:Adam Heuskes

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: just reaches start class because of content  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 10:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:I Used to Love H.E.R.

message: The fact that someone put 7 citings to say that it was one of the greatest recordings ever kind of reeks of overdoing it... One of those "methinks he doth protest too much" kind of deals.
We get it, you think it's dope, and you got as many sources as you can to say it.
But it don't need 7. -DK
This is the dopest hip-hop song of all time and they could have 100 citings for all I care its that ill.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.11.195.9 (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 7 cites?

message: about.com is not a reliable source to say it is the greatest song of all time. that is the opinion of 1 guy who makes the list.64.105.34.67 21:06, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  delete about.com 

message: This song seems more important as far as chart positions and it was a single from the album. Not to mention the GNR song is called "Used To Love Her." Anyone wanna fix this, I ahve no idea how.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.75.109.22 (talk) 20:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "I Used To Love HER" redirect to a Guns N' Roses song? 

message: I think maybe the part under 'content' where it says "West Coast hip hop and G-funk" should be changed to something like "gangster rap and commercial hip hop" or just "gangster rap" because I think the song was taking issue with those genres specifically and not westcoast and g-funk as a whole. 'Westcoast hip hop' is a very broad term that includes more than just gangster rap and gangster rap itself is not just confined to the westcoast. And including 'g-funk' is just redundant because it is just a sub-genre of gangster rap.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeloroc (talk • contribs) 01:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change 'West Coast hip hop' to 'Gangster Rap' (or 'Gangsta Rap') ?
Talk:I Wanna Rock

message: Why does the article not say what this song charted at? Did this song not chart? If it did, then say where it charted at. If it didn't, then please tell me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.191.194 (talk) 22:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Charts

message: Genre here: Heavy Metal.
Lol.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:FD30:DE00:917A:969B:7EE9:39CE (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Wanna Rock
Talk:I Wanna Sex You Up

message: Please tell me that is a mistake. -- eo 18:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cher covered this song????!!!

message: Where's the segment about the music video? 46.251.88.228 (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music video
Talk:Adam Horowitz

message: Why isn't there anything here about his editing for Mondoweiss?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.209.171.121 (talk) 08:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone put in the credits list what Horowitz is credited WITH? Writing? Directing? Producing? Needs expansion I think. CaptainPedge | Talk | Guestbook</sup>  19:58, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credits 

message: Israeli family heritage should be mentioned.--2001:9E8:26B:1E00:6421:3378:AC65:766A (talk) 01:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family background 

message: Wondering if the two writers were related? 74.195.41.176 (talk) 23:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any relation to Author Mitch Horowitz?
Talk:Adz Hunter

message: Did they use a split-screen technique? I can't recall seeing frontal shots of both at once. I heard that they used a body-double, and always set the camera angles up to disguise this. --MartinUK 15:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:I Want You Back (Bananarama song)

message: Source is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.66.76.116 (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bass Playing  

message: I've upload this pic cover because it's high resolution. EncicloCharlie 01:16 22 December 2007  —Preceding comment was added at 23:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Explain why it is better?  There are several Bananarama singles covers that have been in WP for a long time.  Yours is just slightly larger.  What is the purpose for changing to this new one? - eo (talk) 00:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song sleeve 
Talk:Second class constraints

message: The author calls r^2-R^2=0 a secondary constraint,
and calls the following ones with different names, thus giving a wrong impression
of what is really meant by a secondary class constraint. Besides,  I dont think it is clear how those constraints are acquired. 
Sticking to this example it is necessary to clarify why we need all 4 of the constraints, and why they are all classified as secondary class constraints.
--Zjappar 22:37, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem you're having is that you (quite understandably) are confusing "secondary constraint" with "second class constraint" which are completely distinct concepts. A secondary constraint is a constraint that one finds by demanding, on the grounds of consistency, that the primary constraints (whatever constraints you started with) have vanishing time derivative. So not only do you demand that your constraint \phi = 0 you also demand that \dot{\phi} = 0. Sometimes this will lead to a new constraint (frequently not). Constraints arrived in this manner are called "secondary constraints". The distinction between primary constraints (whatever constraints you start with in the Hamiltonian formalism) or secondary constraints or tertiary constraints, etc. is largely artificial and unimportant. A dymanical quantity is called first class if its poisson bracket with all constraints vanishes on-shell, and second-class if its poisson bracket does not vanish with all constraints on-shell, then it is called second class. Hence, a second class constraint has nonvanishing poisson bracket with at least one nother constraint. The distinction between primary and secondary constraints is very important. Perhaps the Dirac bracket article I wrote will clarify. Steve Avery 17:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Adam Kidan

message: :He also pled guilty to really serious fraud charges. God this article is missing a lot. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim is also made in the New York Post. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:03, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ditto - this article has some serious problems. It's a puff piece, particularly given that he was a figure in one of the most serious political crimes in recent decades. 71.169.31.236 (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged crimes
Talk:Ivan Shestakov

message: Question: just read a source indicating that Shestakov died in November, not December. Could this be a mistake, or a calendar issue (Julian vs Geogorian)? --Laserbeamcrossfire 08:47, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, awesome. Thanks! By the by, the article I'm working on is the Rurik (1892) if you want to check it out. --Laserbeamcrossfire 07:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death
Talk:Adam LaRoche

message: Please, please stop this silly edit war on LaRoche's fan clubs, and please do not spam it with external links that do not comply with Wikipedia guidelines.  Further, even if arguendo these edits belong, please write them in grammatically correct and neutral point of view manners.  Please discuss the matter here.  Until I see a sign that these will happen, the article will be protected.  --Nlu (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Which Minor League teams did he play for?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bspald94 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: His minor league record is here. It would be good to integrate that information into the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:13, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Leagues

message: Feature article about his life of service. http://qpolitical.com/the-heartbreaking-reason-mlb-star-adam-laroche-quit-baseball-to-follow-his-faith/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rauterkus (talk • contribs) 18:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More insights
Talk:If (Bread song)

message: Added Olivia Newton-John to the covers section. I believe she was the first to cover the song, for her debut album. In unintended reference to 85's comment from 2011, I also added a line to the intro quoting the first few words of the song. I know the copyrighted material warning is there to prevent wholesale quoting of the lyrics, but it is totally fair use to quote a few words so that this song and its article isn't confused with the many other songs of this title (as 85 implies happened). I personally only found out it was originated by Bread a few minutes ago when looking up info on the song having heard Olivia's version for the first time today. I always thought it was a James Taylor song from the late 70s. 23skidoo (talk) 22:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: ONJ and Opening Line

message: This article is a bunch of nonsense. The persons that wrote the article confuse the song "if" by evans, hargreaves and damerell with this "if" by bread. This is why we have things like "it was quickly covered by Perry Como!!, Frank Sinatra!!, Telly Savalas!!" Nonsense!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.242.76.186 (talk) 19:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense 

message: The source from brides.com that is supposed to support the claim that this song is a "perennial favorite at weddings" does not mention Bread or this song at all, nor do any archives of the URL. 
I don't doubt the claim, but I can't seem to find any sources that actually back it up. 199.120.30.204 (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wedding song
Talk:If (Pink Floyd song)

message: Is there any sources regarding Richard Wright playing bass guitar on this song? According to PF Encyclopedia Roger Waters played bass. Floyd(Norway) 01:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have the source right now, but Wright seems to have played the bass (plus the keyboards) in the John Peel session. For the studio recording, it's more likely Waters on bass. Black Condor 03:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since Floyd(Norway) and I do have the relevant source right now, I've changed it. (As for the Peel session, to my ears there isn't a bass guitar on the song, just Wright playing bass notes on the organ. But it doesn't matter who played what in concert.) --63.25.113.207 22:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bass guitar

message: The song was not played only once. Though not a great source there is a recording of them playing it live which is available on YouTube (might be the one referenced, I don't know) . Check it out here. I would then suggest that the line in question be removed. --Tainter 22:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. Sorry.--Tainter 00:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  live performances 
Talk:Adam Loewen

message: By what logic is this sportsman a person of sufficient notability for Wikipedia? Aetheling (talk) 15:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability