lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Raëlian cosmology

message: Science is NOT claimed in this article.  Every dumbass who reads this article would know that.  If you know what the Raelian Movement is about, it is possible know that they are NOT focusing on proving Raelian Cosmology, and even a retard would see that to be the case, given enough time to see it for what it is.  There is NO active approach by the Raelian Movement to show this experimentally.  Basically, they can wait until the evidence arises.  Because of these factors, Raelian Cosmology is a PHILOSOPHY just as Sensual Meditation is a philosophy.  If you think that Raelians think its a science then your are arrogantly mistaken.Kmarinas86 01:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it is not a science and not trying to be, so labeling it a psuedoscience was not appropriate.  At the same time, you should consider that this was probably just a misunderstanding (many people assume "cosmology" means "physics") and kindly try to keep your comments civil.  Dragons flight 03:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a Science
Talk:Boeing Y3

message: My best guess is that the Boeing Y3, since it's being proposed to replace the 747 in service and join the 777 and A380 in service, will be 295 ft 7 in long, span 336 ft wide, be 94 ft high, and weigh 3 million pounds empty and 6 million pounds on take-off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.194.116.63 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 9 September 2006
:That could be right, but please see no original research. —Mets501 (talk) 01:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

message: My guess is that this version is based on Airbus 340-600 but the wings are like the Boeing's aircraft it has now and it is added the design on the front is like the 747.  
Does anyone agree that they could create that model for Y3?
Eclaw 16:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearence?
Talk:Soul Nomad & the World Eaters

message: The name of the U.S. release is Soul Nomad.  Can someone change it?
:Done. --Hakanai 04:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title Change

message: While we're at it, I'm sure someone by now has played the game and understands English better than whoever wrote that. Its confusing, and I'm pretty sure it breaks NPOV. I don't even care about that, really. I just don't understand any of it.
: To be honest, the "History of Prodesto" section is practically a carbon copy of the game's Prologue... or at least, what it would've been like if someone Babblefished the Japanese. That section could really be shrunk down quite a bit if we minimized it to just keep the relevant stuff. The characters page will probably also need that, considering that it's still awkwardly referring to Sepps as "Sepu" and Nereids as Mermaids. Wakuseino 18:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and I reduced the thing to about three paragraphs. I don't think I missed anything important, and it doesn't reveal anything that isn't revealed within the first half hour or so of play, so I think it's fine. Wakuseino 19:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sounds Like Babblefish...

message: Article does'nt say when it comes out in Europe. Does it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.76.6.147 (talk) 07:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, NIS haets us Europeans ;_; -masa ♫ 23:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's more accurate to say they're not exactly big enough to do multi-regional releases. They seem to usually get KOEI to release their games in Europe, so if KOEI doesn't pick up, I suppose that's that? Wakuseino 18:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  And Koei are (finally) picking it up, so (thankfully) that's not that :P -masa ♫ 00:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Europe Release?

message: I think we should add that things are a little bit different if you play as the boy and as the girl-hotspot
: How different? If it's just that people talk to them differently (gender specific pronouns and other things that you might/n't say to a boy/girl) then it's not worth mentioning. If it's storyline/characters/gameplay differences or you know, something anyone would care about, then yeah, I guess. A source would be fine too. -masa ♫ 03:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The confession occurs in the female hero path Gig ending. I've never witnessed any gender-specific pronoun attributed to the hero on any path, just attributions to Gig. Helmarn (talk) 02:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The gender of the hero

message: To someone who knows nothing of the game, the gameplay section is singularly unhelpful.  Is it an action/adventure game? A traditional RPG? A tactical RPG? A strategy game?  We should not have to read between the lines to try and figure out what the game is about.  It needs to be rewritten. Chris411 (talk) 21:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gameplay
Talk:Jim Patterson (California politician)

message: I was born in Sanger CA and grew up in Monterey bay (Marina) and I have tried to get my RealID twice now. I CURRENTLY LIVE IN Sanger in Wonder Valley Respectfully Mr. Patterson, I went to the Fresno County hall of records on September 12, 2021 to get my birth certificate for Federal Employment, and had gas cans in my car and caused quite a ruckus until they realized I was no threat. I have held Federal employment for 22years.The reason I’m contacting you is that the CA DMV says that the birth certificate I obtained to secure my Federal employment is not adequate to secure a Real ID. They are saying it’s a copy. They do not accept a Federal clearance as an acceptable form of citizenship. Can you help? 195.155.2.85 (talk) 02:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real ID California DMV
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Participant

message: The title is self explanitory. I only recently noticed I was put on the Semi-Active list. Not really complaining, and I probably am doing a lot less than some of you, but still. Around one-third of my edits are hockey-related, and I'm (rather slowly) building on that total. Kaiser matias 08:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The page was reorganized a few weeks ago. A message was posted on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey. Flibirigit 13:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text: No requirements, feel free to sign up. --Krm500 21:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does one have to do to be considered "active" 

message: Most of the memberships monikers have been 'unlinked'. GoodDay (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a change at  has broken a parameter.  It's unrelated to this page. Looking into seeing what happened. Resolute 20:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be better now.  Near as I can tell, at some point Resolute, etc. was changed to , though the template doesn't support that kind of piped link as the template itself removes the User: from the display.  Resolute 20:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What happened?

message: How about a Chicago Blackhawks Task Force? I mean, with them quenching that drought a few months ago, from a roarless penthouse to the Madhouse on Madison again in a matter of half a year, they deserve it. 
Belugaboycup of tea? 15:59, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Task forces are created when there are a group of individuals who want to work on the team together. Almost all of the task forces that get created are created by people gung ho to work on them, and within a week or two are dead with no one doing anything with them. As such unless you can find a bunch of people who want to work on a team specific task force we probably won't create one. Most of our co-ordination happens on the main hockey project talk page anyways so we don't really have the need for multiple task forces. -DJSasso (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Task Force 

message: Self proclaimed NHL hockey knowledge genuis lineups all teams and there promising prospects can do all NHL but habs I no litterly everything looong for things I can do RoberTroke (talk) 06:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginner lookin for NHL jobs
Wikipedia talk:Protecting children's privacy 2

message: This could be addressed with a few lines added to WP:USER, as long as it doesn't lead to a bunch of wikilawyers agruing that since WP:USER is not a policy, it's not enforceable. Thatcher131 (talk) 01:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I argue against this for the reason stated. An enforceable policy is needed. --Elliskev 02:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:USER]] 

message: Much better than that other policy, but..
:Users identifying themselves as children should be gently informed of this policy.
Would this be done through email? And what if email is disabled by the user in question? JayW 01:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can do it on their talk page, and then go back the next day and delete the revisions containing the info (that way they could only be seen by admins) or even removed by oversight.  The alternative is permanently block the account on sight and ask the user to register a new name, which might be quite a blow if the editor had a long history. It may not be perfect, but its better than doing nothing. Thatcher131 (talk) 02:02, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent question, JayW. I agree that the only resaonble way to do it is a discreet note on the user talk page.  Obviously, the notice would need to be deleted within a short timeframe. We definitely don't want to solicit an email address. --Elliskev 02:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: On the one hand, WP:CHILD removes a child's specific identifying information that I can't see as being of any practical value to the project.  On the other hand, this removes knowledge that a person is a child.  Now that does seem like a useful thing to know.  Working with a young person is likely to require extra care and patience.  I would rather have CHILD than this.  Dragons flight 06:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks, but no thanks. 

message: According to the nutshell, this policy only applies to certain namespaces. In my opinion, this policy should apply to ALL namespaces. --Edtalk c E 16:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does this policy apply? 

message: To keep discussion central and organized, I suggest we redirect this proposal back to the original proposal, Wikipedia talk:Protecting children's privacy, which is still under discussion. >Radiant< 16:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralize
Talk:Urelement

message: The German version of Urelement claims that the class of urelements is a proper subclass of the class of individuals. This requires clarification and should be corrected in the corresponding page. FLoebe (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this stems from two different uses of the term. Sometimes, people use "individuals" just to mean the objects of any theory. I'm not sure if such a minor point should clarify this, as I think the clarification itself might potentially be more confusing, but if anyone has strong opinions about this they may do it. Phill (talk) 23:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction between German and English pages wrt "individuals" 

message: Is there, or could there be created, a categorical definition of urelement?Rich 01:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. I'm not familiar with any real work done on that matter, but I can offer my thoughts. One trouble with a categorical definition of urelements is that if morphisms are taken to be functions, how would one define functions on something which is not a set? One possibility would be to not define them, and then maybe call urelements those things on which there are only identity morphisms, but then you would lose some crucial properties of the category of sets, e.g., the existance of terminal objects. Another possibility is to treat urelements as distinct empty sets, and then you can define urelements as objects isomorphic to 0 but not identical with 0. Just my uninformed suggestions. Phill 11:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: category theory and urelements

message: *Another way is to work in a one-sorted theory with a unary relation used to distinguish sets and urelements.
**What is a one-sorted theory?
**Is it possible to typify such a unary relation?
Thanks, --Abdull (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A "one-sorted theory" is one in which there is only one type of object; in the context of set theory with urelements, the distinction between "set" and "urelement" can be done by an additional non-logical relation U, where U x means x is a urelement; or adding an additional non-logical constant U, where x ∈ U means x is a urelement.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''one-sorted theory''? 

message: The link to http://standish.stanford.edu/pdf/00000056.pdf is broken (the domain does not exist).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictorPorton (talk • contribs) 22:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A broken link in the article
Talk:Chinese mountain cat

message: Sure, you hear about them, but have you ever really seen a picture of them in action! With teeth and everything! Chinese Desert Cats are very interesting and they inhabit a small area of mountainous western China. They live up to an altitude of 10,000 feet! They have long canine teeth, and with colors varies of broken stripes of dark spots running vertically down the flanks of it's body and with similar beautiful markings on the cheeks. The tail is ringed and tipped with black. The paw pads are well-tufted and there are also short tuffs of hair on the tips of the ears.
Thank you "The Encyclopedia Of The Cat" by Micheal Pollard Copyright Parragon 1999 2003 Barnes&Noble Books for some info!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.185.254.103 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 9 September 2006‎ (UTC)
:I'm not sure your exclamation-point-laden summary of an entry from another tertiary source helps us improve the article. Was there a particular fact you wanted added?  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Desert Cats: In action. 

message: I can't find an answer elsewhere to this but the article suggests it is a small cat and then goes on to say that its 80cm long +35cm of tail. I'm sure it must be 80cm including the tail, else its actually quite a considerable sized cat, considering most domestic felines are around 40cm long + tail WikipedianProlific(Talk) 01:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Small in the Family Felidae (when compared to tigers, in other words). Speciate 03:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. A domestic cat is a  small cat.  :-)   — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small cat --> 80cm long?!? 

message: This Science article only looked at 5 individuals from this taxa. Depending on the method of analysis used, they are either a sister subspecies of Felis silvestris ornata or a sister species of Felis silvestris. They are quite divergent, possibly as long as 230,000 ypb. At this time I think having a redirect from Felis silvestris bieti is enough. Speciate 03:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be in the article then. At present it simply says they were reclassified as a subspecies seven years ago, and that is enough to change the article text and infobox to refer to them as F. s. bieti.  You appear to be making the case that this classification is controversial; if this is so, we need sources showing this, and then the controversy should be documented here. A discussion about whether, for WP purposes, this is F. s. bieti or F. bieti is in order.  A personal interpretation that the Science article is or isn't conclusive of something would appear to be original research.   — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:20, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: True species or subspecies?
Talk:Conjunctive archaeology

message: It is the same text of the article Walter Taylor, but incomplete. I think that must be merged or deleted--Locutus Borg , Talk to me 01:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I think this and the Wheeler-Kenyon method plus a few others could be lumped to together in a alternative archaeological methods article and stuck in two categories Category:Archaeological theory and Category:Methods and principles in archaeology
:When it comes to merger proposals, I think the important question is not "Are the two articles more or less the same?" but "Can they usefully be led into into covering complementary material?" On the whole, I think that biography, even of people closely associated with certain work, is better dealt with separately from the subject matter of the work. From the point of view of someone looking for information on the subject, which here is Archaeology, the biographical material is clutter.
:The best approach may be to tease the two articles apart rather than merging them. However, it may be best to consider making it a paragraph in Processual archaeology and redirecting there. (RJP 17:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: proposal to merge
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Templates

message: I was wondering if this was made somewhere saw the NBA Championship championship team tables and wondering if anything for the NHL has been made up here just fill in the proper names and years. Here is a example, Go Avs! by the way.
Colorado Avalanche 1995-96 Stanley Cup Champions
19 Sakic (Conn Smythe) |
21 Forsberg |
13 Kamensky |
22 Lemieux |
48 Young |
8 Ozolinsh |
18 Deadmarsh |
12 Simon |
26 Yelle |
6 Wolanin |
9 Ricci |
10 Murray |
25 Keane |
5 Gusarov |
7 Leschyshyn |
52 Foote |
2 Lefebvre |
24 Klemm |
20 Corbet |
16 Rychel |
4 Krupp |
14 Hannan |
35 Fiset |
33 Roy |
Coach Crawford
<noinclude>
*That proposal was discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey and was defeated. Flibirigit 18:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stanley Cup Championship Teams

message: Is there a template made for the international teams? If not could someone make one, because at the moment the international teams templates seem to differ from country to country. I like the Finland national men's ice hockey teams infobox. Id write one myself but have absolutly no idea how they are written. Salavat (talk) 05:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just looking on this templates page because I wanted to find an international team infobox template. The association football national team box template is great. I want to create one for ice hockey, but I've never done it before either. I can give it a try, but if I can't get it figured out then I'll ask for help. I also like the style of the Finland infobox. JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here ya go, guys Template:Infobox_national_hockey_team to see it in action, here --Lvivske (talk) 11:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  International teams infobox? 

message: It would make sense to have some WP:Hockey consensus before someone comes along and decides to request deletions for duplication.  For the most part, they all do the same thing.  Some improvements to the wikicode should be able to make a common template.  Please list additional templates as they are found. — MrDolomite • Talk 19:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is actually being discussed on WT:HOCKEY right now. -Djsasso (talk) 19:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will the real team template please stand up?
Talk:Scoop neckline

message: Perhaps this (and all other neckline articles) should be combined with the general one on necklines. There doesn't appear to be much more to be said on this topic. Elsbeth0 01:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the history of this neckline could be elucidated. -- Beland (talk) 02:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: : "A scoop neck shirt is one in which the scoop-shape neckline is dropped significantly below normal limits, but generally not so far as A-neck shirts commonly worn by men or the more unisex tank top."
This doesn't quite seem to fit either of the definitions of "tank top" with which I'm familiar.  Garments referred to as tank tops, as far as I can tell, come in quite a range of neckhole shapes/sizes - but admittedly it's hard to tell where the definitions begin and end.  Besides, see this image and its description from a previous version of Tank top.  And I'm not sure if you can really compare it with the "sleeveless pullover" kind either - didn't these usually tend to be V-necked? -- Smjg 22:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The image has been deleted now, but for the record, one of them was wearing one with a neckline close to the neck itself and quite small armholes, and the other one with a much deeper neckline and larger armholes. -- Smjg 18:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison with tank tops 

message: Mick Jagger. Burraron (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  One word
Talk:The Third Era of Tamriel

message: I believe it would be wise to move this page to something along the lines of "Eras of The Elder Scrolls", with details on the Dawn, Merethic, First through Fourth Eras, and the calendar and its mishaps. And look, look at this, a reliable third party source! Oh, and what's this? Another? I'm overwhelmed with joy already. Why, it seems you folk have your work cut out for you. Just move this page, collate some content, and cite, cite, cite! Good luck! Geuiwogbil 04:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fried bread

message: For the last couple of decades, due to increasing concerns over health issues, bread is often grilled instead of fried.  Isn't this a convoluted way of saying Toast?  MortimerCat 17:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I have changed it. The "fried bread" in the picture doesn't look much like fried bread, though, does it? (More like half-done toast.) -- Picapica 11:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Picture now much improved! -- Picapica (talk) 04:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grilled Bread 

message: "A British fry-up may include fried bread, as may the traditional full English breakfast." These two are the same thing, according to their wikipedia pages. As is the Irish breakfast, mentioned later on. Maybe a different phrasing is in order? 72.53.92.48 (talk) 03:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fry-up, full breakfast, Irish breakfast 

message: I love this. How much bread? I mean, a whole loaf? Is there any relationship between the amount of bread and the number of calories? Physicists are getting excited. Equinox ◑ 08:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to User:Doug Weller who silently improved this without commenting. Equinox ◑ 10:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess I should have! Doug Weller talk 11:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bread that has been fried in butter has about 180 calories" 

message: I saw the prod and my first reaction was to agree, it's just a slice of bread that's been fried. But it turns out there are actually multiple traditional dishes in multiple cultures. Valereee (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  prod
Talk:Hunter Valley cannabis infestation

message: If anyone could shoot some nice pictures of the Hunter Valley Hunter River or the environs and upload them, it would be nice. :) Dlohcierekim 01:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see what I can do. They won't contain cannabis, though.  :-) --Athol Mullen 02:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Got a picture of Hunter Valley in there.  Gobonobo T C 22:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures