Talk:Humphrey (cat)

message: Just conducted a substantial rewrite of this article. Here's some things that came up during the editing of this very important article:
:I wrote the original and I think I can help you about some of the questions. Hope you don't mind if I interleave my answers with your questions Usenet style. David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As a stray Humphrey's birth is inevitably shrouded in mystery. I found press articles giving his age in 1990 as either two or four. It's clear he was fully grown by this time, but I don't think we will ever really know. David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)

text: This and the other definite dates are definite, taken from contemporary newspapers which I found through LexisNexis when working for an MP. I no longer do and can't check but if I recall correctly I took this date from the date when the previous mouser, Wilberforce, retired. David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Again, contemporary newspapers. Most of them were in the LexisNexis database by this stage. David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Dates of disappearance are impossible to state with accuracy ("Did you see him today?" "No, I'm sure he'll be in tomorrow") but I think I can remember having to calculate this back from the length of time he was stated to have been missing. The Times did not print an obituary but it did report on the death, an embellishment which is quite typical of urban legends like this. The rediscovery of Humphrey was immediately after the public announcement of his disappearance (the day it appeared in the papers or the next day) so it would be very unlikely and probably unique to deliberately print an obituary for a living cat. David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)

text: It all depends what you call a press conference - the press were invited to see him, and they could ask him questions (didn't get many answers as he seemed unimpressed). David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantial rewrite 

message: The original article stated 1986-1988 but everything I could find stated that he was around a year old at the time of his arrival at the Cabinet Office in October 1989, putting his date of birth at circa 1988. I've gone with this latter date.
:As a stray Humphrey's birth is inevitably shrouded in mystery. I found press articles giving his age in 1990 as either two or four. It's clear he was fully grown by this time, but I don't think we will ever really know. David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Humphrey's date of birth

message: The original article gave the rather precise date of February 12, 1990 but I could find nothing to verify this. All other reports give October 1989 as the date of his arrival, so I changed the article to this.
:This and the other definite dates are definite, taken from contemporary newspapers which I found through LexisNexis when working for an MP. I no longer do and can't check but if I recall correctly I took this date from the date when the previous mouser, Wilberforce, retired. David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Start date of Humphrey's employment

message: Couldn't verify the exact date of June 7, 1995 but left it in. Also couldn't verify the exact John Major quote but found similar, so left that in too.
:Again, contemporary newspapers. Most of them were in the LexisNexis database by this stage. David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Robin chick massacre allegations

message: The original article said he went missing in July 1995 but everything I found suggested June, so I changed it. Could find no reference to September 25, 1995 being the date of the announcement of his presumed death but I've left it in. Some places state that The Times went as far as to print an obituary but I can't find any evidence of this and it's unclear whether this was before or after the announcement, so I've not mentioned it.
:Dates of disappearance are impossible to state with accuracy ("Did you see him today?" "No, I'm sure he'll be in tomorrow") but I think I can remember having to calculate this back from the length of time he was stated to have been missing. The Times did not print an obituary but it did report on the death, an embellishment which is quite typical of urban legends like this. The rediscovery of Humphrey was immediately after the public announcement of his disappearance (the day it appeared in the papers or the next day) so it would be very unlikely and probably unique to deliberately print an obituary for a living cat. David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 1995 disappearance

message: The original article stated that his retirement was announced on November 13, 1997. However, the Telegraph indicate that while he actually retired on that date, it was not announced until the next day (sort-of backed up by BBC News Online, which didn't report on it until November 15). The original article also implied that he was presented at a press conference but contemporary BBC reports indicate journalists were actually taken to see him at a secret location in south London (it's implied that this may not have been his actual retirement home). I changed both these parts of the article.
81.132.136.79 04:38, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It all depends what you call a press conference - the press were invited to see him, and they could ask him questions (didn't get many answers as he seemed unimpressed). David | Talk 21:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Retirement

message: This is fucking ridiculous, that's all I have to say. Wikipedia is becoming more and more a bad joke.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.206.196.132 (talk • contribs) 22 March 2006.
:Never in my whole life have I been more angry. Look at it. It is great. Unironically though, the Her Majesty's Chief Mouser of the United Kingdom of Great Britan and Northern Ireland is a great introduction to politics for British children. Just because you dont like something does not mean there should not be a wiki article. There are many articles in published encyclopedias about Lincoln's dog, FIdo. SHould it be removed just because it is a dog? NO!
--The Radioactive Box  — Preceding undated comment added 05:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't have to read it if you don't like it! Besides, the amount of newspaper articles and even statements from the prime minister and his cabinet justify by themselves the utility of this article. There are far less notable articles than this one. And that's what makes the beauty of Wikipedia, you can find everything! --IronChris 04:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: he had his own spitting image puppet! Having one of these in the UK was the sign you had made it as a notable person. So of course he deserves an article. Coolug (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'd delete the whole article 

message: While I appreciate the humour in the article, writing it as though the cat was a politician isn't very encyclopedic. The various events around the cats like could still be stated, but perhaps re-written to emphasize the fact that this article is indeed about a cat; for example, cats cannot be "hired", they are pets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harley peters (talk • contribs) 23:16, 16 April 2006
:I don't think the article is written in an unencyclopaedic tone. The word "hire", for example, doesn't actually appear anywhere in the article. If you think there's any other questionable wording in the article, please be bold and change it. --Sam Blanning(talk) 23:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable format 

message: The clash with Cherie Blair seems wrong to me.  Tony Blair and his family actually live at 11 Downing Street. Bluap 18:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The two buildings are joined together and Humphrey patrolled them both (and indeed much wider - his main work was at the Cabinet Office. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 18:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cherie Blair 

message: I love seeing the quality and quantity of this article, particularly considering the probably limited amount of info available, and think that maybe it really could be a candidate for good article status. Maybe we could have one of the people who has worked on it put it up for peer review and see what kind of responses it gets. It probably could use a little work, but all such articles too. In the next couple of days, when I finish wish what I am trying to do right now myself, I'll try to do what I can to help improve the article myself. And thanks to everyone who's worked on it!! Badbilltucker 20:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future GA candidate? 

message: Apparently (this is from the tiems of July 16, 1994) Major had said. "There is a slight embarrassment : we believe he's a lady cat".  The Cabinet Office said the vet had told them he's a neutered male.   Morwen - Talk 11:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Humphrey gender controversy

message: "Staff at the medical college realised the truth when they saw a familiar black and white cat on the television news. Their new black and white cat, answering to PC - for Patrol Car - admitted all." - The Guardian, September 27, 1995, p. 6. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 14:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrol Car 

message: What next? "Hamburger(mouse) - Chief Cat Entertainer to the Cabinet Office"? Seriously, get a life. --154.5.61.233 (talk) 06:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeah right...

message: The allegation is sourced from The News of the World, but in turn the paper is quoting Don MacIntyre's biog of Peter Mandelson. If I can find the original source, I'll use that instead. --Old Moonraker (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: --Old Moonraker (talk) 17:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drugged by Campbell 

message: The article currently states: 
I believe there are two official residences on Downing Street, number 10 being the official residence of the PM, and number 11 being the official residence of the Chancellor.
IIRC, during Tony Blair's time in office, number 11 having more bedrooms, and he and his wife having a number of children living at home, they swapped residences, and street numbers.   Geo Swan (talk) 16:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I just checked Downing_Street#Houses_in_Downing_Street.  It says like Blair and Brown, Cameron and Darling may have switched which families occupied which living quarters.  Geo Swan (talk) 16:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

text: I am going to remove the passage about the flat above #10.  Geo Swan (talk) 16:18, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  question 

message: *Top five London political pets - JuneGloom  Talk 00:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Humphrey (cat). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090316133405/http%3A//www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/corp/assets/foi/humphrey_cat.pdf to http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/corp/assets/foi/humphrey_cat.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/foi/pdf/humphrey_cat.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050406012608/http://www.catsincharge.co.uk/humphrey/index.shtml to http://www.catsincharge.co.uk/humphrey/index.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion