Talk:Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami

message: I shifted the page here from Bangladesh Islamic Assembly, since the English form of the name is never used. English language media in Bangladesh and abroad refer to the party as "Jamaat". The history of the article can be found here. --Soman 23:22, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Several points in the article need 3rd party citations to prove NPOV. Lot of weasel words and unsubstantiated claims exist. Examples:
*Imam died a few years later, and since then no protests against Jamaat alleging war crimes has occurred. 
:* [Citation to prove this wrong http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/story-details.php?nid=3]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.216.86.122 (talk) 16:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV instances

message: I have removed link Gun culture in Pakistan. this link had nothing to do with the article.
and also removed 'is alleged to be a part of the Al-Qaeda network.' because there is no proof of it.You should provide any reasonable proof about this statement.الثاقب (WiseSabre| talk) 15:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit by wisesabre 

message: Do not play the game of politics here, please. Only include what you know for sure. Specially linking Jamaat with bombings and then AL with attacking their own office, well, that is just trying to play down each other. Conspiracy theories should go under the 'conspiracy theory' section, not under normal headings.
Agreed
 Abdurrahman207 (talk) 09:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Politics here please 

message: There's a lot of assertion in the article, and a distinct lack of sources.  Could someone provide these, before this turns into a full-on POV dispute?  Alai 17:54, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: Having seen the evolution of this page, starting off as an Awami League rant, I doubt the authenticity of this page. No sources, libelous assertions, and basically a charge sheet of the Jamaat. Note this page and the Awami League page
yeah, right:S The whole world is conspiring against jamaat. get your head out of your ass.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghorial (talk • contribs) 00:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a partisan/partial entry 

message: You can’t revert other people’s edits without reasons. I will be happy to talk to you about my edit, please tell me where you disagree. 
One of the reasons why Jamaat-e-Islami is gaining popularity, which is a fact, is because they are seen as the least corrupt party by most Bangladeshis. This is one of fact that many Western journalists and anti-Islamic-fundamentalist mentions. This is an encyclopedia, therefore this has to be mentioned as one of the reasoning why Jamaat-e-Islami is gaining popularity. 
You may think I am being bias toward Jamaat-e-Islami but look at my entire edits. I deleted many things that favor Jamaat-e-Islami because it creates NPOV and this is an encyclopedia, those individual stories don't belong here. I deleted 
"After the Four-Party Alliance handed over power to the caretaker government, on the 28th of October, 4 Jaamat workers were mercilessly killed by Awami League workers in front of the media. The whole world bore witness to the merciless killings. The daily star also printed a picture showing a Jaamat worker with a gun, but it was later revealed that the image was taken on the 22nd of April, not on the 28th of October, proving the partiality of the media."
I deleted this sentece which also favors Jamaat-e-Islami,
The Mukti Bahini was responsible for the killing of many people, including Jaamat members and Biharis.
I deleted because it is not accurate because Mukti Bahini in general didn't target Jaamat members, they targeted traitors which may happens to be Jaamat members.
Tarikur 18:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To user: Rising India 

message: jamaat is fully an islamic party. so jamaat act for islam. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.108.19.7 (talk) 11:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  jamaat is fully an islamic party 

message: ...the party clearly exists, so it's not a hoax in that sense. Who tagged it as a "hoax" and why? Keep in mind that that adds it to CAT:HOAX, which makes it appear that the ENTIRE ARTICEL is a load of nonsense. 68.39.174.238 20:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So... 

message: Dear sir,
I would like to edit this page "Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami" would your please give me the authority to edit this page. Now this page contain some illegal information about Bangladesh Jamaat-e-islami.
--- Arifur Rahman 
Jamaat (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "Illegal information", for example? --Ragib (talk) 07:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *The page protection has expired, you can edit the page, closing edit request. Monty845 15:39, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from , 12 October 2011 

message: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-15794246
This material seems relevant to this topic given the arrests, including the leader of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, in relation to the war crimes. 124.168.72.97 (talk) 02:34, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC article on war crimes 

message: I have just read some of the article.  I never heard of this party until today, when I saw it mentioned in a news article and wondered what I could learn from Wikipedia.  I have no opinion about it.  I am not South Indian and have no axe to grind.  Nevertheless, I was immediately struck by the lack of objectivity in the introduction, as well as the lack of citations.  I believe this article needs a careful, thorough, and objective rewrite.  I hope there is someone who knows enough about Bangladesh and published sources, and is not politically involved, who can do that.  Zaslav (talk) 07:54, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Zaslav, thanks for noticing the fact. Like most of the other Bangladesh related articles, this article doesn't maintain the wikipedia rules. Specially it is very poor in citation. I wish if I manage time, I can improve this article.--Freemesm (talk) 12:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs objectivity 

message: I appreciate if you Freemesm bring it up on the talk page rather than deleting my revisions. Explain why you think "this is not the way to wright from a editorial type site" and refer to Wikipedia guidelines in stating your position.Tariqmia (talk) 08:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See  and WP:SPS--Freemesm (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ghulam Azam Timeline of Joining Jamaat

message: Freemesm, this article is marked with several banners to identify its many weaknesses, but you reverted my edits, including content supported by RS, which were an effort to introduce more neutral tone and factual accounts. This article does not belong to you alone. I worked to improve the tone, add cites to unsourced material, improve formatting and try to bring more shape to the article. Your reversion is without basis.Parkwells (talk) 18:19, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion of legitimate edits and RS

message: Revert two cites and material about student wing.Parkwells (talk) 03:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert cited material

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 01:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I believe that adding the section on Shibir here is inappropriate since it may be explored in detail as a separate page on Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir. If the forum members have no meaningful objection, I would like to remove the section and keep Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir in a "See Also" section. 
--Mohammad Hossain 16:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can the section on Bangladesh lslami Chatra Shibir be removed since there is already a page dedicated for Shibir? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151208063534/http://www.supremecourt.gov.bd/nweb/case_history/case_history.php?div_id=2&case_id=179191 to http://www.supremecourt.gov.bd/nweb/case_history/case_history.php?div_id=2&case_id=179191
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130429062944/http://news.priyo.com/topic/islami-chhatra-shibir to http://news.priyo.com/topic/islami-chhatra-shibir
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://theindependentbd.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=180166%3Ahc-cancels-registration-of-jamaat-as-political-party&catid=187%3Aonline-edition&Itemid=223
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160127070548/http://old-archives.newagebd.net/detail.php?date=2012-08-03&nid=19421 to http://old-archives.newagebd.net/detail.php?date=2012-08-03&nid=19421
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have moved the following paragraph from the article to here because it misrepresents the source:
Salik says Jamaat-i-Islami bid for 44 seats, but six other parties bid for seats too, 193 bids for 78 seats. Major-General Farman "tried to work out a formula to satisfy all [the rightists]" but Salik doesn't say how many seats he eventually distributed to Jamaat.
The lasting importance of the by-election is questionable. It was never completed because the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 intervened. It might have interest as evidence that Jamaat cooperated with the army, as an example of Jamaat's opportunism during the Bangladesh Liberation War, or as the high water mark of their political aspirations. I have no objection to a paragraph on the topic being included, but it needs more information and context than is available from Salik. A starting point might be this news blog, but academic sources meeting WP:HISTRS would be preferred. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salik misinterpreted