Talk:IDEF

message: While IDEF deserves a page, I believe IDEF0 and IDEF1X deserve their own pages as well.  An arguement could be made for IDEF3 having its own page as well Tee Owe 14:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree IDEF0 and IDEF1X deserve their own pages.  (I don't know enough about IDEF3 to have an opinion.) Guanajuato 20:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created an article about IDEF0 today. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[IDEF0]] and [[IDEF1X]] 

message: In the history section, one should add time references. One can't clearly figure out in what year (or what decade) IDEF1X was developed or first published.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmerson (talk • contribs) 18:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time references 

message: LDDT is worth mentioning because IDEF1X is essentially a renaming of LDDT. No history of IDEFX can be even remotely accurate without it. Before reading your note, I had copied some of the text, less the first paragraph as you suggest, to the IDEF1X entry (which I just discovered). To be very clear, to name all the authors of IDEF1 and neglect to credit the author of LDDT aka IDEF1X is intellectually disreputable. The NIST standard, the IEEE standards, Bruce's book, and Mary Loomis' book all make clear the essential contribution of LDDT and its correct authorship. The Wikipedia entry should do the same. By the way, I agree the IDEF entry is out of balance in other ways as well. Guanajuato (talk) 00:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your response. I have recently written the articles on IDEF0, IDEF1X and IDEF5, among other things, and studied most I could find online, but I am not a real expert in this field like you. So I do appreciate your input. Now I am acting both as a writer and a senior editor here, concerned with getting these article more interesting for a general audenience. I want things to start simple and become more detailled the more one proceed. So you agree on moving most of this text to the IDEF!X article!? -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 00:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why LDDT 

message: * In this edit text is copy/pasted from the IDEF4 article.
* In this edit text is copy/pasted from the IDEF0 article.
* In this edit text is copy/pasted from the IDEF5 article.
* In this edit text is copy/pasted from the IDEF6 article.
-- Mdd (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-paste registration 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on IDEF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070126094915/http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/1995/06/IDEF.asp to http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/1995/06/IDEF.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070622145629/https://idbms.navo.navy.mil/DataModel/IDEF1X.html to https://idbms.navo.navy.mil/DataModel/IDEF1X.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070126094915/http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/1995/06/IDEF.asp to http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/1995/06/IDEF.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified