Talk:Panda pornography

message: Thank you for the insights on how Wikipedia works. It's interesting and I'm happy to see how speedy your reaction was. However, given the recent coining of the new term, I see no reason why this term should not be added to the Wikipedia, as it is obviously interesting to researchers, who might be considering to apply similar methods in order to prevent extinction. I am planning to write an introduction and the outcome of the experiment. Atlien26 09:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeh, I agree, reality sometimes is fun. :) Atlien26 14:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

text: why not? it entertains me 2800:810:565:8B57:D5A8:1AA3:85EB:5211 (talk) 18:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Insights

message: I think similar  techniques have been extended to other species, and will try to get references. If I do, someone will need to find a more general title.DGG 17:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about "Pornography for animals"? If similar cases have been documented we could merge and redirect this and create that as a new article. Just try finding some references.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 12:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: and others

message: Is there a record of who coined this term? It seems wrong because pandas are not paid for sex so they are not prostitutes and porn- means prostitute. Bonechamber (talk) 09:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See the references at the bottom of the page and you will see that reputable news agencies use the phrase "panda porn", short for "panda pornography". Also, in wikipedia pornography is defined as  "the explicit portrayal of sexual subject matter for the purposes of sexual arousal and erotic satisfaction". As such, the films shown to the pandas to further their species while in captivity, justifies the title of this article. there is no mention of the fact that paid prostitutes must be involved although probably, in mainstream pornography, they would be. - Takeaway (talk) 11:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The analysis that a word must mean the same as its etymological roots seem highly flawed. Cf. English examples like "silly" (blissful), "deer" (animal), "haven" (harbor). And what about pornography in media such as literature or comics? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 19:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

text: This is something called "panda pornography", in an elegant and fun shorthand. It is not, however, actually pornography, which is a term defined in relation to humans: we are not in a position to ask pandas their opinion on the matter, and it's an interesting epistemic question as to whether we can even contemplate the possibility of doing so. Only a very small number of zoophiles would be aroused by it, and their opinions don't count as they are both (a) an insignificant minority among humans, and (b) not pandas. Compare "food pornography", the photographic depiction of delicious food for the interest of foodies, which is also not pornography. -- The Anome (talk) 09:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Term appropriateness

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Panda pornography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061201204441/http://www.ananova.com:80/news/story/sm_2089577.html?menu=news.quirkies.animaltales to http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_2089577.html?menu=news.quirkies.animaltales
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified