Talk:List of Star Fox characters

message: Where's Leons picture? It has dissapeared! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.69.210.3 (talk • contribs) 
:It was deleted because the source URL could not be found. Thunderbrand 18:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leon? 

message: I was told to see the talk page about this issue, but it appears there's no discussion about it. I think it should be listed as Caruso, since that is the most recent version of his name. If someone doesn't dispute this in the next little while, I'll change it. 199.126.137.209 05:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See the archive link at the top of the page. It should probably be changed to "Caruso" as the offical site lists that too. Thunderbrand 13:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "Caroso", because that's technically his original name (the American release of Star Fox: Assault came out way before the Japanese version). 208.101.148.128 13:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Panther's name talk

message: I see in the to-do list that it states the stub-inclusion of articles on all the main characters here, as well as links to the individual character pages, but now it appears as though the character pages have been changed into redirect pages, with far less information in the sections here as well. For example: The information on Falco's name source and his rivalry with Leon were both lost in the transition, and have not since been recovered or reimplemented. Is this the final form, or are things still being moved? Just worried since there was no discussion of this on Falco's talk page. --Blinkstale 04:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a pretty big discussion about it in this page's archive. There is a link at the top of this page. Some stuff had to be trimmed down when it was moved here. The stuff on Falco was pretty much speculation, since his name origin wasn't sourced. His "rivalry" with Leon is a very minor thing. Thunderbrand 14:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thank you, I wouldn't have thought to look there. Should there be anything linking to major discussions of the past on this page, kind of like a miniFAQ? That way, the same discussions don't continually rearise after you guys delete them from the discussion pages? Just a thought. --Blinkstale 00:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I liked the individual pages, it was far more cleaner, and we could go in detail about the characters. Now that's all redirected, it looks very ugly and not very pleasing to the eyes. --Willy105
I agree 100%, individual pages are very convenient if you are listing characters from a franchise with so many characters at least you can have a picture of each one without looking over illustrated, this must be disscused futher-Dark Dragon Flame 05:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No more individual pages?

message: why does going to that page redirect to here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.204.29 (talk • contribs) 
:Because Peppy's entry is here. There is no justification for its own page. Thunderbrand 14:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: do a barrel role

message: It seems that someone keeps adding unnecessary images on this page. I added some info on a few sections yesterday and they downright removed it. There is also an issue dealing with speculation in Wolf's section, something about his "eyepatch" or whatever it is being a "targeting system". Any suggestions?  --AgreeneyedFox 19:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Honest to goodness, do any of you guys realize just how popular Krystal is?  She needs to have her own article back!!!  Just look at Fanfiction.net or [Fanart Central]; Krystal has a small legion of devoted fans.  I'm not exactly one of them, but I feel like the fanbase justifies giving Krystal her own article back.  I've been trying to do that, but, so far, I've only succeeded in starting an edit war.  See the talk page for the details.  --Luigifan 20:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it seems no other users besides you wants to change the article back. Her write-up in the article is practically the same as it was when there was a separate article. Thunderbrand 22:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

text: While I agree that the original separate article had what I thought was a lot of useful info that warranted having its own article, I don't agree that Krystal should be given her own article again just because she's a popular character.  This article is about the characters as they exist in the game series, not as they exist in fan fiction. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 00:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Krystal doesn't NEED her own article, but her section IS getting pretty big, and most character sections (if not all) will continue to grow, assuming there will be another Star Fox game. Other than that, I don't know what to say. --AgreeneyedFox 05:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Seriously, AMIB? Hbdragon88 05:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... Krystal's role in all of the three games she's appeared in is pretty important, but important enough to warrant her own article?  Well, I have to admit, unless there's something we missed, maybe not...  --Luigifan 12:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Notice that Star Wolf deals with a group as a whole, not about any individual character.  All of the characters who are Star Wolf members have their own section in this article.  Krystal should not be granted any exceptions. Hbdragon88 23:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously, Krystal should have her own article... 

message: Please,give the above listed characters their articles back, I can think of a lot of Categories they would fit in to.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.42.164 (talk • contribs) 
You got my vote it was just plum bitter that way and what happend to there height,weight and age they use to have that
I agree to an extent, but not each character having individual articles for themselves (with the possible exceptions of Fox and Andross), but more like a team article, ie A whole page about the Starfox Team. That way more information could be gathered without making the article as a whole as spacious as the character atricle could be if the same instance was applied. Because, each character had quite interesting information regarding them (which were verified), which the character article does not include or loosely mentions. that makes the sections for each character incomplete, up to recent events anyway. For example, Andross' article has one small note that he appeared in Star Foz Command in that he appears piloting a Bio weapon. The whole point of his appearance is left completely left out (his reason for being there for example), and even the fact that there was a fake Andross in Star Fox 64. A similarly used concept was used for the Cult of Skaro article for Doctor Who, which is a character article about The cult as a whole, and included much more information about each member, more information than what is stated for the character article we have here, and most of the characters in this article have made many more appearances then the Cult of Skaro havein Doctor Who. Seriously, more information is necessary for the characters, and the most effective way is to grant each character, or whole team (Star Fox, and Star Wolf) an article. In fact more could then be said about the villains associates (such as the bosses in Star Fox 64) in their respective articles as well (all the bosses having a brief description in the Andross article as his associates), in much the same their would be articles for each team, so that each article would be equally about more then one character associated with a group of team. The First Darklord (talk) 23:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree it would be a good idea to make a page for the Star Fox and Star Wolf teams individually, but not a page for each character. 75.60.227.23 (talk) 01:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Falco, Slippy, Peppy, Krystal, Andross, and Wolf need their own articles back

message: I think the above character should have their own articles, there are so many Categories they would fit into. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.42.164 (talk • contribs) 
:The consensus was to merge them. Most of the stuff written about them is crufty anyway and needs a lot of work. Thunderbrand 00:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Panther, Leon, Pigma, and Andrew need their own articles

message: Seriously, the guy needs his own article. He has just as much info as Fox does, we will be able to get a clearer image of his personality, and I hear a big rumor that he might appear in the next Star Fox game and Super Smash Bros. Brawl as a playable character.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.175.119 (talk • contribs) 
:Scales' article was fairly small when it was merged, since there isn't a whole lot of info on him. And anyone could be in the next SSBB. Just wait until there is concrete evidence. Thunderbrand 17:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Scales needs his own article 

message: the above characters should have their articles back, I can think of a lot of categories they would fit into. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.187.115 (talk) 17:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, these guys are not minor characters.  --Luigifan 11:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not characters about which reliable publications have seen fit to comment upon. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 22:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, and reliable publications talk about Pokey all the time, right? Thores 15:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, he does have a point about Pokey. As much as I hate to bring up the Pokemon Test, some of these characters are pretty notable. --Piemanmoo 06:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

text:  Not Scales but Falco's so Damn important and maybe Wolf they definitely need articles. BaconBoy914 (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Give  Falco, Slippy, Krystal, Wolf, and Andross their articles back, Pretty Please? 

message: There is this cool web comic out called The AGENCY. This has quite a bit of different animated characters from different universes, and some of the characters are from Star Fox! Maybe we could create a Wikipedia page about this web comic; You guys have to read it first, though (I've already read through it all) at the point I've written this). To read the comic, look for JediAnn Solo on Drunk Duck Webcomics. Add to this section if you are ready to create a new page! Dragonstar4 8:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The AGENCY'' 

message: His article sounds a bit unjust for him, so I edited it to be fair in his case (i.e. his breaking of the stereotype in Command). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.83.13.16 (talk) 16:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited Panther's article 

message: Seriously, Krystal is a rather popular character, and I feel that she should have her own article back.  For instance, she's the most popular StarFox character on Fanart Central.  --Luigifan 11:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration for [[Krystal (Star Fox)|Krystal]] 

message: He speaks normally in other languages in Command - it's only his English version that sounds weird. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 122.2.116.244 (talk) 08:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panther's dialogue 

message: I mean, why not? Captain Shears is a star fox character (even if it was from the Star Fox Adventures Prequel Manga, he is still a star fox character nonetheless), and he served as the antagonist who was trying to revive Andross from the grave. I mean, if you were able to add a Starfox SNES comic-only character (Fara Phoenix) into this article, then you can sure as heck add Captain Shears to this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.32.182.50 (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I think Shears should get mentioned. But he isn't very significant, no more than Fara. Q Games has also recently drawn inspiration from the comics, officially adding Papetoon to the list of planets in Lylat, so Shears and Fara probably have a chance of being canon as well.--Blinkstale 20:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fara did appear in an early version of Star Fox 2. Takuthehedgehog 15:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Papetoon was stated as being Fox's home planet way back in the Japanese manual for Star Fox 64. 208.101.136.230 23:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Captain Shears is worthy to be in this article. One, it was directly under the supervision of Nintendo of Japan, so it's much more in line with the games than, say, the Nintendo Power spin-off. Second, there are no major contradictions between the manga and the games, and it doesn't try to be its own storyline. Third, just like Star Fox Command's overall game-play, Captain Shears was borrowed from a lost element of Star Fox 2 (notice that Captain Shears is exactly the same as General Pepper's redesign had the game been released, except that he's wearing green instead of blue and he reveals his eyes). 208.101.148.128 13:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Captain Shears be mentioned in this article? 

message: Through google I found the Japanese Star Fox Assault site, but everyone's names are in the form of images. If anyone can type them out we could put them in the article. Also here's the Japanese Command site, I don't have time to explore it right now. Takuthehedgehog 15:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone here type in Japanese? 

message: According to the original Japanese manual for Star Fox 64 (translation available at IGN), Andross set up a trap for James "in which he did not survive". This very explicitly states that James died, and nothing vague like 'his fate' or such like (which is probably a way of censorship and making less references to death). And as for him being a playable character in Command, realize that no one except Fox felt his presence, just like in Star Fox 64. Obviously there is a spiritual connection between them. To say now that James is alive is just trying to be idealistic. 208.101.136.230 23:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, that's a pretty good argument. But it seems like all subsequent games since Star Fox 64 have been deliberately vague on the matter. The Japanese SF64 manual makes it seem final, but Nintendo have changed their minds on certain elements of continuity for their franchises before, especially if this is only stated within the manual and not the actual Japanese version game. But like I said, it's a good argument (if this IS really in the manual, by the way, if we decide to do things your way you'll have to cite your source in more detail.. page number etc, if not a link to the actual manual page), and I think we should hear other opinions on how we should go about this before a final decision is made. Thores 05:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly. I don't have the exact page number, but the whole IGN translation is pretty reliable since it also made us realize that Papetoon was in the game continuity even before Star Fox Command: http://ign64.ign.com/articles/060/060767p1.html . But maybe there should be more direct translations from other sources before a definite conclusion can be reached. One thing I do know is that, in Star Fox Command's pilot galley, James' section never said that "it was said that he lost his life" in the Japanese version (although I don't think I can back that up since the site that it was on, Arwing Landing, decided to 'update' all the pilot info with their counterparts in the English version instead of keeping both, and I don't know if the translation exists elsewhere, but it might still be on the forums somewhere). Maybe if someone could, say, translate the Japanese Trophies in Super Smash Bros. Melee, that'd be a very good start. 208.101.148.128 10:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, it's available at GameFAQs: http://www.gamefaqs.com/portable/ds/file/933009/44395 . And it does say something similar to the English version. 208.101.148.128 09:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, going by this, I'd say it's entirely possible that James was definitely intended to be dead, no question about it, when Star Fox 64 was released. However, it seems like both the American and Japanese versions have decided to keep the issue of his death vague since then, so I think we should let the theories stay in the article until either a game director or a future Star Fox game reveals more. Thores 08:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  James - Once and for all. 

message: :Image:Dashstarfox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Dashstarfox.jpg

message: :Image:James Command.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:James Command.jpg

message: :Image:EmperorAnglar.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:EmperorAnglar.jpg

message: :Image:Amandastarfox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Amandastarfox.jpg

message: There's an interview in N-gamer which has lots of real world information.. --Nydas(Talk) 18:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those will work well here, and substitute the player's guide information. I don't know if you're trying to make a case for Fox or something, though. TTN 20:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview in N-gamer

message: Or are they not even notable enough for that? Come on, people! 153.42.168.174 (talk) 22:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where the Lawrence Whelk are the pictures? 

message: There is still nothing that warrants separation from the article. In creation, the first paragraph is filler (it's about the series). The second fits in the general concept and creation. The basis for Fox fits in here just fine, though the part about the scarf will have to be removed, unless I'm missing a mention of it. The part about being based off of Miyamoto's personality also fits into the general creation, as it goes with the mention of the other character's personalities. The rest of the minor notes throughout the article can also be placed here as well. TTN (talk) 18:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of wasting everyone's time with made-up policies and your grudge against Nintendo articles, why not apply these notions of yours to the Sonic and Dragonball Z articles? You are a fan of these franchises, I believe.--Nydas(Talk) 20:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This has nothing to do with policies or guidelines. It's about managing content in a way that makes sense. Despite what you seem to believe, this is not a contest to obtain the most articles. It's about writing a detailed encyclopedia. This information works much better in the list; there is no other reason for my proposal. I hope that in time all of our fiction will have appropriate weight; it's just going to take a while. TTN (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You must admit, the article isn't exactly bursting with content, especially as a lot of OR was trimmed away...it would probably condense well into two- three paragraphs and greatly help the characters article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has more out-of-universe content than all but a handful of video game character articles. I didn't realise that articles had to 'burst' with content to be worth keeping, are we back to your 'good-or-featured-within-a-month-or-else' ideology? As for organising information sensibly, it makes no sense to target solid fiction articles when there's stuff like the Sly Cooper bosses, Sonic character forks or Spoo hanging about.--Nydas(Talk) 23:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And the information still belongs here. It fits nicely; it helps establish notability; it's nowhere near requiring a split. Don't even bother using WAX; it's one of the worst arguments around. TTN (talk) 23:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

text: No merge. For the reasons I've given and supported earlier, NO merge. --AgreeneyedFox (talk) 19:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Fox, take two

message: Does anyone think that Star Wolf's hideout in Assault (Sargasso Sea Space) is a reference to the novel Wide Sargasso Sea and its various media adaptations? ChromeWulf ZX (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Star Wolf Reference? 

message: Fara Phoenix redirects here, but she's nowhere to be found in this article. - furrykef (Talk at me) 21:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fara Phoenix 

message: I'd hit it myself, but I'm at 2RR and would like to stay that way. Can someone else please take care of this? Coreycubed (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anon attempting to add unsourced Krystal speculation 

message: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/wolfoxokamichan/trophy2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/wolfoxokamichan/trophy.jpg
taunt: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gNXQzmmafQA  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.92.128.25 (talk) 00:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panther and Leon appear as trophies and special taunts in Brawl 

message: someone edited general peppers article. and he used star pex. i edited it back. but why did he do that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.186.33 (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  star pex 

message: Here's the vid. http://youtube.com/watch?v=arRHChWh5tk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.112.210 (talk) 11:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any idea on Wolf's English VA for Brawl? 

message: Is there any proof to this?
Yeah--his trophy, and the special dialogue on the Lylat Cruise stage. 74.14.11.169 (talk) 02:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caroso spelling in Brawl? 

message: I remember when I was a kid when our neighbor gave me all of his old Nintendo Power magazines. There was an interview with one of the creators of Star Fox 64. One question I thought odd was 'Is there any character you dislike,' to which was answered, 'Well, I really hated the English version of Bill's voice.' However, another question asked was, 'We're all curious, while other character's names have fairly obvious connotations, "Pigma Dengar's" last name doesn't mean anything in English. Any comments?' 'Well, that's actually a pun on a Japanese word which means (he said something like, 'to go against,' or, 'to betray'), and is sort of an inside joke with us.'
Anyway, I have long since thrown those issues away. If anyone has a NP stash around there house, that's where you can find the citation. I don't remember which issue it was, but I think it will have "Interview with creator, etc" on it. Sorry. :? ~TJ  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.120.117.184 (talk) 22:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to find citation for Pigma Dengar's namesake 

message: Just where exactly is the source for Slippy's gender?--Herb-Sewell (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm changing any references to Slippy's gender until we get a source.  Herb-Sewell (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this a joke? --(trogga) 22:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, Peppy's statement after the Titania mission in SF64: "I'm sure He's learned his lesson!"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.191.26 (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slippy's gender 

message: I am pretty sure only Slippy, Fox and Krystal are the ones who are voiced by their Assault VA. As you check this vid, you can see that Wolf, Panther, Leon, Falco, and Peppy didn't have their Assault voice actors credited (that, and they actually sound different). Any idea who voiced them in Brawl?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.126.98 (talk) 10:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brawl English VA? 

message: Wolf does indeed sound a lot like Engineer and Assault Wolf (the gruffness on the voice).
In Star Fox Assault, you can hint that Falco there has an accent similar to the one in Brawl.
Is it possible that the two are not credited?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wuffiekun123 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibility that Goodeve did Wolf and Madoey did Falco here? 

message: Where does it say that the real ending the the one where Krystal changes her identity and migrates to a new planet? I believe Starfox Command has no true ending, and if Nintendo says there is, then it's most likely Ending 1 because it's a combination of Endings 5, 6, and 7.
Joey368 (talk) 22:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does it Krystal's bio describe Ending 4? 

message: How can Wolf be voiced by Jay Ward if he's dead? --Coconutfred73 (talk) 15:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jay Ward?!

message: Do we really need the long list of outfits that Krystal wears in each game?  It's not notable (and i don't just mean in the real world; even in the Star Fox universe I don't see how it's notable), and it's more specific information than we are giving in the article for any other character, including Fox, which makes the article look awkward.  I am deleting that list for now; if someone wants to bring it back, could you please explain here why you think it's important to have that section?  Thanks. --Politizer (talk) 23:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krystal's outfits 

message: Can you please explain why you are removing :Image:Star Fox Brawl.jpg from the lead-in of the article?  So far, you have not left any edit summaries or discussed your edits so none of us can tell what your rationale is.  
Furthermore, regarding your additions of :Image:Falco Command.jpg and :Image:Wolf O'Donnell.jpg...I don't have a problem with having those images there, but if we are adding images of them and removing one of the few images that actually has Fox in it, won't we risk facing issues of undue weight?
Please expain below.  --Politizer (talk) 15:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As there has been no response yet, I'm going to put that picture back for now.  If anyone thinks the picture (or any of the other pictures in the article) should be removed, please discuss it here.  Thanks, Politizer (talk) 18:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Alex 8194]] 

message: I removed the extra whitespace added in this edit and I figured I should explain why here, to avoid any revert wars.  I can see why you added that whitespace--so that the beginning of Fox's entry would line up against the left margin, instead of being indented by the image.  But I think having that large amount of whitespace (as you can see if in the old edit) is probably not visually pleasing (I don't know if there is an official WP policy on this), and guessed that having the beginning of the Fox entry offset a bit by the image is not as bad as having all that whitespace.
Alternatives to this would be putting the image in question (the image of the Star Fox team) on the right-hand side of the article; that isn't really a good alternative here, though, because there are already two images close together on the right side (the image in the lead-in, and the image of Falco not long after), and squishing this image in between them is also not aesthetically pleasing.  One could remove the lead-in image and put this Star Fox team image in the lead-in instead (after all, the lead-in image is from Brawl, not from a Star Fox game); the only problem with that is that this image is very small, and also doesn't look good in the lead-in (trust me, I tried it and it didn't look good).
The best solution is probably just to come up with a better image, put it in the lead-in, and scrap both this and the Brawl image.  In the meantime, though, I have put the image where it is because this seems to be the most aesthetically pleasing layout, given the materials we have to work with. 
--Politizer (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement of images 

message: Despite Star Fox 2 not being an officially released game, but still nonetheless very real, should Fay Spaniel and Miyu Lynx perhaps have honorable mentions? There might not be very much to put, however, since little can be established of their characters aside from animated gestures and translated dialogue...
ProjectPlatinum 00:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Fox 2 Characters? 

message: The article really doesn't have anything going for it besides some creation information, so it would be best to merge it her in order to strengthen this article. TTN (talk) 01:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is actually a little disheartening: you'd think more people would care to give input one way or another on this matter.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose the merge, since as the star character of an entire series Fox is definitely notable. The article could use a "reception" or "cultural impact" section, but it is already sourced as far as the character's development goes.--ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some advice for reception searching: Search articles on IGN! Thought it's hard for common names like Navi (which brings up Navigation, Navy, etc.), Fox McCloud would be easy to find some articles on. Remember, just because an article isn't about Fox's reception doesn't mean a piece of reception about him isn't worth mentioning! - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

text: OK...the result of this is this dead/keep Purplebackpack89 (talk) 00:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Fox McCloud

message: Why does the article state that Wolf's change in design (from 64 to Assault onward) is "... due to the fact that he got into more serious criminal manners and therefore has a bounty on his head." ?? What would entail such an impression? (67.58.249.220 (talk) 05:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolf's Design 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Caiman (Star Fox). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 15#Caiman (Star Fox) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 07:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Caiman (Star Fox)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Slippy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  QuicoleJR (talk) 15:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Slippy]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect List of minor characters in the Star Fox series has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  QuicoleJR (talk) 15:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:List of minor characters in the Star Fox series]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]