lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heckler & Koch UCP

message: Can anyone add a picture? 68.113.47.82 18:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would add a lot.  Images exist, but may not meet Wiki standards in using them. 66.191.19.217 (talk) 20:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some re-writing of the article needs to be done, then. Currently most of it reads as if the project were still active. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 06:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a little text editing to change tense. But since it never went into production I'm proposing merging it to Heckler & Koch MP7. Rezin (talk) 19:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Clark Jolley

message: This article now meets the requirements for Start class in WP:Oklahoma. I have removed the stub class icon from the main page. Bruin2 (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reassessed
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Mike18xx

message: Some discussion above seems to be turning on this question... Most admins don't really care about the distinction, actually. If the behaviour of a relatively new user is to engage in disruptive edit warring with little or no other contributions, that user may very well be blocked, possibly indefinitely, regardless of whether it is a sock or just a friend or forum poster brought in at the request of someone or whatever. See WP:DUCK. Mike is not the only person who should take note, but based on his statements above, he really ought to take particular note of it indeed.++Lar: t/c 18:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socks or meats? 

message: According to the rules of the RFC, editors can be either involved in the dispute or not. The disputants sign either the statement of the dispute or the response thereto, but they cannot both file an RFC and write an outside view on it, as Itaqallah did. That's an either-or situation. Beit Or 19:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signing in appropriate sections 

message: A recent comment on the project page by , who signs as "Chris Cunningham", bought a response from Mike18xx which  has moved here. Since the text Itaqallah put here made no sense without the context, I'll detail the sequence of events.
;1.  endorses the "Outside view by Itaqallah":
:Yup. It's the completely unabashed assholeism which is the problem here, such as boasts like this. Agreeing not to repeat specific actions while continuing to war with people in exactly the same way otherwise is gaming the system. Chris Cunningham 13:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well! It's a good thing I haven't described anyone as an asshole right to their face, or I suppose I'd be so  oughta here. I swear that some of you must have throats as big around as sewer-pipes in order not to choke on your own hypocrisy.--Mike18xx 21:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

text: with no additional text except the heading "Chris Cunningham".
Hmmm. CWC 02:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

text: my apologies, i thought it was clear that the comment pertained to what Thumperward wrote in the outside view section. i should have elaborated. ITAQALLAH 02:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'm sure I'm not the only one who suspected that you were carefully protecting Thumperward, so I'm glad to learn otherwise. Cheers, CWC 09:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Response to Chris Cunningham
Talk:Bora Yoon

message: This is a new article about an interesting musician whose actually won awards, not just a person with muscial dreams.  I will expand it probably tomorrow.VK35 16:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are many bands, singers and other musicians and musical ensembles with articles on Wikipedia (see :Category:Musicians).
A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, hip hop crew, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:
*It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.
:Qualifies.  Featured in the Wall Street Journal (front page article extending to inside page, not just a music review buried inside the newspaper) as well as other sources.
*Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country, reported in reliable sources.
:possibly qualifies having performed in Australia, France, U.S.
*Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
:possibly qualifies, has 2 solo albums
*Has won or placed in a major music competition.
:Qualifies.
*Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show. 
:Qualifies, music score for a movie.
VK35 17:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria for musicians and ensembles
Talk:MidAmerica Industrial Park

message: This article meets the requirements for Start class. Bruin2 (talk) 03:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article class
Talk:Nebraska City, Nebraska

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  11:28, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: Many of the headings of this article are useless add-ins such as museums and attractions. Hate to say it, but this isn't a tourism website!
98.16.178.183 (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much info about Nebraska City!! 
Talk:Guwahati Refinery

message: The notability of this facility is currently unclear, since no secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for companies, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press coverage, or books in which the refinery is mentioned. Please add such sources to the article. 
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 16:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability
Talk:Der Tagesspiegel

message: Maybe the Tagesspeigel is read mostly by a community of West-Berlin, or at least the western german people, but is there any notion on which ground this newspaper is founded or its comments lead to? 129.217.211.199 (talk) 02:38, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political profile? 
Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis national football team

message: Hi all,
Can anyone find any clarification on Keith Gumbs' international goal tally? The 47 goals stated on this page seems to be an inflation along with his caps count as it's unlikely that St Kitts played 130-odd official games in Gumbs' career. The statistic given by NFT has Gumbs at 40 appearances and 23 goals but misses his goal at the 1993 Caribbean Cup therefore is not a definitive source. Felixsv7 (talk) 11:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible. St Kitts played 130 matches during Gumbs career so that might just be a typo (the likelihood that he played in every single game over a 22 year period is quite small though). I don't know if games like those against St Martin or Sint Maarten would count as full internationals but most would. The results page also has almost 100 goals unaccounted for during that period so he'd only need to score 20ish of those which isn't outwith the realms of possibility. Without a definitive source though, it's impossible to say. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 09:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair, I've just changed his cap/goal number to align with National Football Teams' data until a better source comes along. Both previous changes to his caps (131) and goals (47) were made by IP addresses with no other edits so it doesn't scream legit. Felixsv7 (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keith Gumbs 
Talk:Giuseppe Mario Bellanca

message: In Italiano wikipedia ,:it:Mario Faccioli is said to be the first Italian aviator who effected a flight on an airplane planned and constructed in Italy. (earlyaviators)Fuusenn (talk) 13:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Did Giuseppe Mario Bellanca make first flight of an Italian-designed, Italian-built, aircraft?
Talk:Hilal-i-Imtiaz

message: Is this the second, or third highest award for Pakistans civilians? The page Ashfaq Parvez Kayani contradicts it. Ageofe (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hilal-i-Imtiaz(Military) is the second highest military award  of Pakistan. You are rite that article's statement was contradicting it, so i edited it. --SMS  Talk 18:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second or Third? 

message: Can we have some examples of persons with the honor, and the field?--DThomsen8 (talk) 22:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples?
Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Hall of Fame

message: I created the DYK Hall of Fame as a result of the discussion here.  I placed ALoan's name on the page since it is likely that he will be there anyway with a total of 180+ awards and to give an idea of how the page might be structured. In addition to recognizing the number of DYK awards received, there is a DYK Participation section.  This is meant for those individuals who have made noteworthy contributions to the advancement the DYK project. This may include those who have been participating for years in DYK or have made significant, insightful advancements to the DYK project. Editors may be added directly by number of awards whereas addition to the DYK Participation section requires discussion below. -- Jreferee 16:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of DYK Hall of Fame

message: I have 1 FL, 4 FA's, 11 GA's and 35 DYK's, but I don't have a Triple Crown :( Tony the Marine (talk) 21:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Triple Crown

message: Is it unusual to have 18 (12+6) DYK credits in one day? I don't really know who has had what so maybe this isn't so strange. Also, what about nominating 25 (new) articles at once? Maybe someone has nominated 25 before but have they all been new? I wonder what to do or if such things have any place here... there doesn't appear to be a list for either so they must be common enough. I see I'm giving this page it's now annual addition. I wonder who will drop by in 2010... --candle•wicke 14:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  18 in one day? 25 at once? 

message: Hi all,
I'm concerned that the "DYK hooks with 5 or more articles" table is getting excessively long. Now that somebody's set a new record of 54 articles, I think there's not much point in having a very long tail of 5- and 6-article DYKs. What do you think? bobrayner (talk) 11:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? bobrayner (talk) 09:39, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, I think that people taking the effort to put 5 articles in a hook should not be discouraged from doing so because it makes the HoF list too long. I think if you feel it's getting too long, it could be put in it's own subpage (ie. for a full list see xxxxx)  The C of E   God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:41, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the C of E. We should list 5+ article hooks on a separate page if the table is too long and not "move the goal post" for future hall of fame aspirees. Abyssal (talk) 22:17, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidying
Talk:Paula Franzese

message: I have heavily edited this hot mess of an article. I believe that the issues with it are mostly resolved, so I have removed the tags that were placed on the article. Some parts of the article could still be better sourced than they are. SunCrow (talk) 10:08, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags removed 
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Awgu

message: The original Bishop of this diocese still has that position at this writing.  You can leave the history  notes in when another bishop arrives (or a priest of this diocese moves to a bishop assignment elsewhere), but this Wkipedia article would then need a separate Bishops section. Carlm0404 (talk) 09:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  future Bishops section
Talk:Ashen Victor

message: Has anyone noticed that Snev looks alot like Edward Scissorhands? – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 16:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that you mention it...However, we shouldn't mention this in the article though.  --BrokenSphereMsg me 04:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Snev
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Lagos

message: Why doesn't Archbishop Martins have an English Wikipedia page?   He has one in several other languages:
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Adewale_Martins
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Adewale_Martins  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AvidReader11663 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No page for Abp. Martins?
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Onitsha

message: Please set up new page for díocese of Ekwulobia, a new-in-2020 suffragan of this Archdiocese.
Its bishop is Peter Ebere Okpaleke. Carlm0404 (talk) 14:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New suffragan this year
Talk:Protein Wisdom (blog)

message: Should we incorporate more information about Frisch here, such as her stint at University of Oregon or the National Science Foundation?  If we're going to list some bio information for Goldstein, we should probably also do it for Frisch.  Does anyone know where we can get access to the old Frisch article? SkipSmith 17:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I say we should focus on the incident, not Dr. Frisch as a person. It was a mistake for me to use her name as a section heading. How about "Offensive comments"? Or even "Frisch controversy"? Any ideas? Help me out here, please! CWC 18:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried "The Frisch Incident" as the section title.  How does that look? SkipSmith 22:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's much better. Thanks, CWC 03:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Hmm. Anyway, I've trimmed that section for better article balance. CWC 13:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Frisch

message: More events have eventuated, and Jeff G has taken another temporary hiatus from blogging. Details here. I've updated the article. Cheers, CWC 02:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2007

message: Please stop taking information out of this article. I can understand your desire to remove a particular phrase that struck you as original research, but taking out all of my edits wholesale because of one phrase is over the line. And, no: you can't simply categorize anything you don't like here as "ad copy" and remove it. Scooge (talk) 06:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Is This Article Being Trimmed Back So Aggressively to "Stub" Level?

message: I just noticed the last line of Stanley Green's sign.  Has Goldstein said whether that's the source of his title? —Tamfang (talk) 17:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  the title 
Talk:Centricity

message: I removed the notability tag because GE Healthcare is notable enough for its own article here.
I removed the primary sources tag because I don't believe that the article is large enough to need it yet.
I removed the ad tag because, again, there wasn't enough material in the article to support it. I added some more details that may help.--SarekOfVulcan 17:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I expanded the article. I do not plan to add any future contributions to this specific article to avoid a conflict of interest, as my spouse worked on the Physician Office module from the time it was known as Millbrook Paradigm. (He no longer works for GE Healthcare, but I am concerned about my own personal bias.) --Oddharmonic (talk) 08:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I did not change this because I think it needs more research to be certain.  But I believe the product was sold before the new owners changed the name to Virence. 
伟思礼 (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Timing on product sale
Talk:USS Horace Beals

message: U.S. Navy ships, by tradition, are always referred to as "she" and not "it." The term "it" is demeaning since ships, by tradition, were considered by their crews to have a human nature.
Considering a ship as "it" is an attempt at revisionist history, and not something that should be tolerated in Wikipedia. Wikited 22:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navy terminology 

message: Page was in poor condition to possible vandalism. I removed the old infobox and replaced it with new type and re-Wikified the entire text. Wikited 23:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page in poor condition
Talk:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

message: Annual Conference held in March each year is a great way to meet people learn new ways to educate and great new products to use in your classroom.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.188.48.44 (talk) 01:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unsure if I'm doing this correctly, but the ASCD is out of date, and I am hoping that someone can make an update.
New membership numbers are http://www.ascd.org/about-ascd.aspx:  Comprising 125,000 members—superintendents, principals, teachers, and advocates from more than 138 countries—the ASCD community also includes 54 affiliate organizations. 
New Executive Director and CEO Deb Delisle who was Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education under President Obama http://www.ascd.org/news-media/Deb-Delisle-Executive-Director.aspx
Chb79 (talk) 13:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The page was updated by OldCrowRivals. Altamel (talk) 03:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs to be updated
Talk:Hail Storm Hill

message: I'm not so sure the article in the current format is right. Hail Storm Hill is a close but separate entity from Cowpe Moss. Cowpe Moss is in Lancashire (a little to the north west), but Hail Storm Hill (a little further south east) is divided between Lancashire and Greater Manchester, and I believe is the joint high-point of Rochdale borough with Blackstone Edge. --Jza84 |  Talk   22:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not so sure...
Talk:Saint Sophia and Her Three Daughters

message: The daughters were certainly not given english words as names. --77.176.243.109 (talk) 09:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With all due respect, the statement that There is a common misconception that the capital city of Bulgaria – Sofia, is named after Saint Sophia the Martyr. (...) The area is in fact named after an ancient Celtic tribe called the "serdi" makes no sense at all. What else is it named after? The Bulgarian capital Sofia is in fact precisely named after the church of Saint Sophia, the second oldest church in Sofia, dating to the 6th century. 
See Sofia#History and Saint Sofia Church, Sofia: In the 14th century, the church gave its name to the city, previously known as Sredets (Средец). The old name Sredets is derived from the ancient name of the city Serdica (or Sardica), but, even with a minimal understanding of etymology, you can see that Sofia cannot possibly be derived from Serdica. Pasquale (talk) 16:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sofia is not derived from Serdica 

message: While trying to edit the language Wikidata, I found out that there is already an article about the saint and her daughters - Faith, Hope and Charity. The two should be merged --Bollweevil (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge wit Faith, Hope and Charity
Talk:Operation Pony Express

message: * Sorry to bust yer bubble, but Pony Express was simply the nickname of the USAF 20th Heicopter Squadron, based at NKP, Thailand. It was one of several helo units that were utilized in the clandestine war in southeastern Laos, usually to transport SOG recon team members in their forays on the Ho Chi Minh Trail. It also was utilized by Operation Igloo White for sensor drops, and by the CIA to transport Laotian tribal mercenaries in the covert war in that nation. There was no Operation Pony Express, and the 20th (later 20th SOS) never flew in Cambodia (that would be the Green Hornets of the USAF 21st Helo Squadron, once again to support the SOG recon effort). RM Gillespie 04:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No bubble to bust there RM, just a thank you for noticing my mistake. I must have been several drinks over the editing limit :). While you're around I'd like to say I really enjoy the work you've done on the Civil war, Menu and Campaign articles - they read very well indeed. Cheers, Paxse 15:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: We have a problem with this article - the name is simply incorrect. A search for "Operation Pony Express" in google shows various uses of the term , , ,  including several interesting and notable operations except for this one. However, given Wikipedia's popularity, this article is now the top ranked search term. This sort of misinformation is what makes anti-wikipedia headlines. In fact, even the article lead refers to "Pony Express" without the operation. The sources in the article also don't mention "Operation" at any point. There is also a potential copyright issue. Most of the images in this article have been taken from http://www.airwarvietnam.com/20sospe.htm (a private website) to be used in the article. However, the licensing placed on the images here in wikipedia says:
"This image is a work of a U.S. Air Force Airman or employee, taken or made during the course of the person's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the image is in the public domain."
I'm not clear how the original uploader determined who took the photos from the website above however the rationale above contradicts the copyright information on the website, which is:
"© Copyright, 2002 by Air War Vietnam.Com.  All rights reserved.  Unless otherwise noted, all text and pictures are the property of Air War Vietnam. Com or the original contributor and cannot be used without written permission."
I think the article needs to be renamed, possibly to Pony Express (USAF) and the copyright status of the images needs to be clarified quickly - these images are currently being mirrored all over the web - when the original owner see them, the Foundation will get the angry letter - not us. Paxse 17:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article naming and images
Talk:Montgomery Place, Saskatoon

message: Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Saskatchewan WikiProject and WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods!  The Saskatchewan WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject.  We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Saskatchewan.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!
SriMesh | talk 01:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Invite

message: The history sentence has way too many links cited. I believe there's a WP:MOS item about this. You don't need more than two citations. 68.146.8.46 17:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Over-citing

message: Most of the history section appears to be quoting from various sources, but these sources are not identified. There also appear to have been images removed. This section needs a rewrite by someone who knows the topic. 136.159.160.5 (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: History section needs revision