Talk:Orlando Police Department

message: Code Enforcement isn't part of OPD, they're their own division of the City Government (you might see CE with OPD if the CE Officer feels threatened or if there's a high risk) so why is there a code enforcement vehicle on this page?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.56.11.2 (talk) 03:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code Enforcement Vehicle

message: It's not a big to do but wouldn't the city crime ranking secion work more into the Orlando article instead of being it's own section on the OPD's article? Either way nothing major.
--24.242.69.11 (talk) 02:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crime Ranking in right place? 

message: I'll be closly observing this page so dont bother with biased vandalism.
--24.242.69.11 (talk) 17:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism Not Tolerated 

message: :Image:OPD logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:OPD logo.jpg

message: :Image:Opdpatch.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Opdpatch.jpg

message: The history of the department for the entire span of time from 1875 to 1997, that's 122 years, has one sentence.  Surely we can do better, Orlando.
Jimindc (talk) 06:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Add some referenced material and make it better! It's me... Sallicio!\color{Red} \oplus 05:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Department history is unusually vague