Talk:Clitoris/Archive 6

message: Some vandal is being very naughty so at least one and sometimes two of the HTML proxies that my ISP provides on round robin have been blocked.  This means I sometimes have to restart the browser and repaste a response.  This evening I repasted a copy of this whole section and then noticed that two other users had added comments in the meantime (Theresa and Luke).  I've tried to restore the changes. I apologise for the mess.  --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:38, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Apology

message: IMHO, it appears question One that needs to be answered is whether there should ever be an explicit picture of the clitoris in this article. - Robert the Bruce 05:01, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Question One

message: IMHO, question two is whether the current pic (which does not depict the clitoris) should be retained until a suitable pic is found. - Robert the Bruce 05:01, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's stubborness as such. This debate has been going on forever. Many people appear to feel enough is enough, this issue has (for them) already been decided long ago.It's a little frustrating, when we are trying to resolve this, but I can see where they are coming from Theresa Knott  (The snott rake) 22:30, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like you agree they are stubborn, you just feel their stubborness is justifiable. anthony 警告
Keep it.  It's not perhaps the best pic, but it is useful as a general map of the surrounding terrain.  Like Abu Ghraib, pictures are or should be a substantial part of this article, but since pictures of genitals apparently offend some people, a solution such as the CoolHandLuke solution would be appropriate for those who prefer not to see the clitoris, but who want to see other images.  Other images might help to supplement this article as well. Pedant 20:22, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)
Not in this article.  The picture is better suited for another article. anthony 警告 20:32, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Question Two

message: You think Clitoris is bad? Wait till you take a gander at Prince Albert piercing. Some of you are going to have apoplexia! - Ta bu shi da yu 14:05, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just remember 

message: It would be better to have a picture in which the clitoris is actually exposed.  Imagine if Abraham Lincoln had a picture of a wall with the caption "Abraham Lincoln (obscured)". Posted by 70.22.31.237
*This has been my point all along. I'm afraid we are up against the mindset that there has to be an explicit pic (any pic) of the genitals at all costs. Pretty sad for Wikipedia really. - Robert the Bruce 16:29, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture's not as good as it could be anyway. 

message: Personally, I am in favor of deleting this entire section, since I think this section contributes far more heat than light. Samboy 14:36, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. I think there are other sections which have far more trolling and argument for its own sake than this one. Maybe I've been watching this page for too long, but I think this section is pretty civil; we're just dealing with strong opinions. Browser-based image exclusion is a topic that has been raised before but never fully explored, so it's entirely relevant. Timbo 16:55, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Dealing with unwanted images without imposing your views on others