lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Wólka Węglowa

message: iwas e liwing witnes of the battle of wolka wegloowa and i know it was not like this 
ihave notseen one horse dead or alive the battle lasted all day and over 3000 thosend soldiers were dead 
i know ihave buried 720 my selve at laski cemetery another 2500is buried in kelpin cemetery 
in mass grave  this can be checked any time 
eugeniusz wojciechowski son of wolka weglowa  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.231.146.140 (talk) 14:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: there was 3720 polish infantry men killed im and arround wolka weglowa in a battle that lasted all day 2500 of them are buried at kelpin cemetery in two mass graves 5oo of them in wawrzyszew cemetery and 720 in laski cemetery all this can be checked but all the glory for it went to husaria polish cavarly regiment which has never been in wolka weglowa and to their leader to whom a monument was build in lomianki while his men are not even mention in history all glory was reserved for that famous cavarly charge which took place near the village of laski two kilometers from wolka weglowa it is about time history goy it wright eyes witness son of wolka weglowa eugeniusz wojciechowski 28 12 2008      PLEASE PRESERV THIS FOR HISTORY the battle took place  0n 19 september 1939 and i was there  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.194.106 (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the facts about  battle of wolka weglowa on september 1939
Talk:Rough Wooing

message: This article uses text from My Wound is Deep: History of the Anglo-Scottish Wars, 1380-1560 and possibly For the lion: a history of the Scottish wars of independence to which Wikipedia is not legally entitled, lacking proper licensing by the publisher. The text was added between these edits. Some examples of copyright problems include: 
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 
I am heartily sorry to say that it seems the article will need to be rewritten to remove any remaining text by this contributor, since he has verified that the publisher did not license its use. I am blanking the article accordingly and listing it at the copyright problems board. I hope that the contributors to this article will be able to help salvage it. Alternatively, it is possible to restore to a point before the introduction of this text: . Obviously, this would hardly be ideal. (For more information, see CCI.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The aforementioned text(s) are both published books. The article does not now use or cite them.Unoquha (talk) 00:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem
Talk:Battle of Vĩnh Yên

message: can anyone do it? alright, we know the 1st Muong Batlalion (1er Bataillon Muong) was there sharpshooter (tirailleur), it's a good starting point ^^. Paris By Night 14:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: order of battle

message: The article states that GM3 lost a full batallion during the retreat to Vinh Yen in the early fightings. The information box, however, tells that total French casualties were ca. 60 killed and 600 wounded. Is this a contradiction or did the French losses mainly occur at that very situation? Regards, A. Horn --84.149.233.253 (talk) 16:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Losses - Correct Numbers? 
Talk:Battle of Mount Dingjun

message: No sources whatsoever, plus some format and style issues. Carom 01:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Care to elaborate on the issues? _dk 07:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. The major issue is the total lack of sources, which is a relatively easy remedy. As far as format is concerned, some of the information from the introduction might be better moved into sections giving context for the battle and describing the aftermath (this is mainly a personal opinion). On the matter of style, the text describing the battle reads a little like a segment from  Romance of the Three Kingdoms, which is somewhat problematic. Carom 17:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In creating this article, I took all the info from wikipedia itself...so let's concentrate on those articles first (Huang Zhong, Xiahou Yuan, etc) and see if we can't make it right =] Cao Wei 05:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Battle of Villaviciosa

message: * Does anyone have a hint/book that says what count Frankenberg was involved here ? (I suspect that his real family name is Bawyr von Frankenberg but i found no good evidence anywhere) -- A1000 (talk) 18:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Von Frankenberg
Talk:Battle of Belchite (1937)

message: It is possible that this article will be usefull for this Offensive:
http://asehismi.es/catalogo/docs/20200514014020_20200512_THE_BATTLE_OF_QUINTO_GLG.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzalo5331 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link. Battle of Quinto in Zaragoza Offensive 

message: I think there is an error in Nationalist numbers, the defenders of Belchite were 10,000 to 5,000 more or less, they were not 100,000
--Willy der Kaiser (talk) 09:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationalist troops 

message: The result is now stated as a Republican victory, however I would argue that is debatable, as stated in the article. It is true that some ground was captured but not Zaragoza as was intended nor was the Nationalist campaign in the north affected.
I would say the result should be inconclusive, or see aftermath, or even strategic defeat. 145.8.179.197 (talk) 10:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result
Talk:Mortonhall

message: The reference to John Ainslie's map is problematic, as the text refers to 17th Century maps, but John Ainslie's dates were 1745-1828. The only map I can find of his which shows Mortonhall is this one, which dates from 1789, so after the new house was built, which was in 1769. If there is an older map which shows Mortonhall, then we should cite it. If not the citation to the map should be removed. It is clear from Gifford that Morton House pre-dates Mortonhall House. Kognos (talk) 12:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Ainslie's Map
Talk:Blackhall, Edinburgh

message: "There is also evidence that the street name "March Road" is derived from "Marsh Road", as the area was bog and wetland hundreds of years ago."
Just as likely the old word "march" meaning a boundary. Most of Scotland was boggy hundreds of years ago, much of it still is - bog would be the more usual word, rather than marsh.-MacRùsgail (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: March Road
Talk:Powderhall

message: It is only now that I am finding out that my father GEORGE ERNEST WHITE Has a history in athletics,
He died when I was very young, 1955 and his past life has been unknown to me other than snipits.
In his obitury which I have recently found says that he ran at Powderhall. He was assistant trainer for Carlisle united football team in 1932 and that he had many handycaps to his belt.
The obitury also states that he won the Boston cup in USA.in 1914
If there is anyone who could shed a little light on how I may find out a bit more about his athletic career or even just point me in the right direction I would be most greatful.
With kindest regards
Mary White  Sat; March 21 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.148.155 (talk) 21:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  history of a past sprinter
Talk:Bonaly

message: More info on the campsite?, also any mention of the nearbye barracks?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanethhilll (talk • contribs) 17:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Camp Site

message: This article could do with being reorganised into the standard sections as per Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements FlagSteward (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Organisation

message: Someone of note must have lived here, other than aristocrats and the obligatory footballers.-MacRùsgail (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people
Talk:Winter operations 1914–1915

message: There are 3 towns called Givenchy in Pas-de-Calais. Which one was the one of the battle? olivier (talk) 11:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which town? 

message: Moved page to conform to the Nomenclature Committee 1919 titles and tied the page in to recent articles to keep it company.Keith-264 (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed my mind after realising that material here was already in two articles and it made sense to collect the material in one place. Since the page appeared dormant decided to put it here. happy to discuss with interested parties.Keith-264 (talk) 21:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

text: Is "Winter operations 1914–1915" the official name? The article treats it as if it is. Srnec (talk) 12:50, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, why?Keith-264 (talk) 13:07, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's bizarre. It should be made clear that this is the official British name. Srnec (talk) 14:23, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

text: Your threshold of bizarre seems rather low but if you want to edit the lead, I doubt anyone would complain.Keith-264 (talk) 14:46, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Battle of Wadi al-Khaznadar

message: According scholar sources like Enciclopaedya of Islam, the name is Wadi l-Khaznadar instead Wadi (a)l-Khazandar. Please check it--95.17.88.231 (talk) 15:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name wrong? 

message: Is this Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia ?
I know that Cilicia, Georgia and Mongols were allied for a while against the Mamelukes.--Eupator 14:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only Cilician Armenia. There were several regiments from Greater Armenia who fought within the Georgian corps. --Kober 04:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armenia 

message: Currently the only source on this article is a single eyewitness account from the 13th century.  This is effectively a primary source, and we really need more information from secondary sources to confirm the information in this article. --Elonka 17:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns about sources

message: I have found no sources that call this battle, Wadi al-Khazandar.
However, I have found sources that call this battle, Wadi al-Khaznadar.
*George F. Nafziger; Mark W. Walton, Islam at War: A History, p67.
*Nicola Di Cosmo, Warfare in Inner Asian History: 500-1800, p240,243.
Does anyone have anymore sources for either? --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to ''Battle of Wadi al-Khaznadar'' 

message: This is a very bad page: Firstly, the Mamluk army was small in size and the Mongol army was twice or triple in number
Ibn Kathir mentions that Salar and Baybars "did not complete the number of their soldiers, so the army was greatly shortened, with poor management and other matters." - (Ibn Katheer, 9/14)
"The number of the Muslim army was about 20 thousand horsemen, and the army of Ghazan was about 100 thousand." Al-Maqrizi, Al-Suluk, 2/319 Perhaps this is an exaggeration, but it indicates that the Mongol army is larger than the Mamluks Romeo778 (talk) 20:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  mamluk army
Talk:Dark Skies

message: The article needs a more detailed synopsis of the story arc. —Theo  (Talk) 18:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In recent episodes of the yt channel 'need to know', Bryce Zabel claimed he was contacted by intelligence agents who offered him real-world information, in order to change the storyline and make it more authentic- in order to influence public opinion and trends. Obviously such claims can't be proved per se, but I believe a mention of this is nevertheless worthwhile.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.1.191.123 (talk) 13:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't merit inclusion unless the claim got secondary source coverage. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  latest claims of intelligence connection
Talk:Something Is Out There

message: I've added the infobox.  I noticed that there are images in the version of this article in another language, but I don't know if cross-linking to their files violates wiki-etiquette or not, so I'm leaving the matter to someone more experienced. --Suttkus (talk) 04:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Are there titles missing from the episode list?  The total number of episoded is noted as being 13, but counting the pilot as two episode, the list only contains 10.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.173.112 (talk) 13:56, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode List
Talk:Manimal

message: Is that a joke?--Agent Aquamarine 23:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiproject...Cats?

message: The notes section for this episode synopsis claims that Chase refers to the title at least three times, including the hilarious off camera "Those are some high stakes back there..." Pretty funny, but alas not true. Just mild wiki vandalism. Somebody who finds it less amusing than myself should probably change it. What would future civilizations think of us if we did not accurately record the truth of Manimal?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.108.184.76 (talk) 03:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: High Stakes

message: In September 2012, it was reported that Sony Pictures Animation is developing a live-action/CGI film based on Manimal. The series' creator and producer, Glen A. Larson, is once again attached as a pro­ducer. The film will be directed by Kevin Lima, director of Enchanted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.197.17.99 (talk) 16:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The Manimal Movie
Talk:RoboCop (live action TV series)

message: Was Commander Cash a villain? Dessydes 19:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I have them - they're out on Region 2, at least.90.199.99.173 21:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any actual evidence other then when it came out to support that it is set after RoboCop 3?  TV tropes claims "The show takes place in an Alternate Continuity (ignoring the events of Robocop 3), where Delta City (the project OCP is trying to complete in the films) is completed."--2606:A000:7D44:100:21CF:A51C:91D8:B5F1 (talk) 14:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Takes place after the film trilogy?
Talk:USS Hopewell (DD-681)

message: I removed the following from the article. If the tone is changed to be more encyclopedic and less like a memorial, it might be fine. It also needs to be be cited with a verifiable reliable source, especially with the very specific numbers. The entire section loses credibility for me when it claims an atomic missile was used to sink the ship. That might be plausible in deep water in the middle of the Pacific during the 1950s, but Hopewell was sunk in shallow water, near San Clemente Island in 1972. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:42, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  End section September 2014
Talk:Deepwater Black

message: Is a citation really needed to support a one-paragraph synopsis of a book trilogy? Wouldn't the books, themselves, serve as sufficient citation? rowley (talk) 20:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary "Citation Needed" Tag?
Talk:Ursuline Academy (Dedham, Massachusetts)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from these URLs: http://www.ursulineacademy.net/history.htm and http://www.ursulineacademy.net/mission.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Proof Positive (TV series)

message: Does anyone know why it was cancelled? I heard several rumors but nothing official. I heard that it was because the show was completely staged, the producers of the show NEVER looked at any of the "evidence" of any of the paranormal things and just said what they liked to be the "proof positive" ones, that's why things about aliens and the Loch Ness monster type stuff was deemed fake and the remote viewing and past life regressions or whatever always were proven right, which led to it's cancellation.
Is any of this true? I am thinking so because that stupid ghost hunters is basically the same premise as this but it got renewed and this show didn't.
Faris b 07:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I always heard Proof + was cancelled because nobody really watched it. It was a boring show IMO and the cases were really out there with some really kooky guests. Like the ghost hunters at Gettysburg... oooh, lens flare reflection, must be a spirit! Or the guy in Puerto Rico looking for evidence of the Chupacabra and saying "these chicken feathers will prove it's an alien creature!" yeah whatever dude... I also hated Scare Tactics cause it was just stupid, but it survived longer than Proof +, so I dunno. I like Ghost Hunters better because it's more entertaining, I don't believe they fake anything, I think they just jump to conclusions too quickly and pass it off as real evidence before looking at every viable explanation, plus if there are hoaxes, I blame the producers, because I think TAPS is sincere enough and serious about their work that they wouldn't deliberatley fake stuff.  It's made it to 3 seasons now so people watch it. SkeezerPumba 23:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A damn shame it was a good show. RobertFL1991 (talk) 21:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancelled?
Talk:Scare Tactics

message: According to Arnold, the owner of Kool Kollectibles comic book shop in Winchester, NV (right on the Las Vegas-Winchester border), all episodes of this show are filmed on his estate on the far southern outskirts of the metropolitan area in Clark County, NV.
Again, that's according to him. Not me. I didn't press his claim further because he's like seven feet tall and I'm five foot nothing. Also, I don't go onto other people's property and disclaim things they say.
Anyways, since I no longer live in Vegas, can anybody see if Arnold is lying or not? I mean actual proof from his mouth or something, not just speculation that'd read, "Well, I highly doubt it. I mean yadda yadda yadd." No, I mean if something has the production info, film permits, etc. Horse's mouth stuff.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coffee4binky (talk • contribs) 20:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show filmed in Clark County, NV 

message: Guys Whats Giancarlo's full name they only said it a name but not a full name hmmm?--112.198.79.1 (talk) 06:36, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: He Shoots He Spores episode

message: Dude, it's real. XXscaretacticsXx (talk) 04:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's obviously real
Talk:Sightings (TV series)

message: A disambugation page seemingly turned inside-out.. Or something not totally unlike it... Anyways, anyone up for the task: make a real disambiguation page and alternating articles for therein. DrWho42 06:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the band is probably much less well known than the TV program and the rest of the categories were directly applicable to the TV series (and probably don't have enough substance to support their own articles at this time), I moved the info about the band to a disambig note at the top and recategorized everything else as subtopics of the main Sightings article.  If further sorting is necessary in the future it can certainly be done, but this should be sufficient for now. -- SmokeDetector47<SUP><SMALL>( TALK )</SMALL></SUP> 04:27, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an example of... 

message: There are free photos of this band on Flickr... Xic667 (talk) 11:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:Cable in the Classroom

message: I have heard of this organization, I don't have any information to expand this article though. RichMac 02:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The organization has been around for years and a bunch of articles link to it. I'm not sure what the problem is. TheNewMinistry 02:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the category section, it says non-profit companies based in Massachusetts, but if you look at the website they are based on Massachusetts Ave. in Washington,D.C.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.89.13.183 (talk) 03:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability
Talk:Gregory S. Newbold

message: I got his biographical information from the Google cache page dated March 13,2006; of www.uscm.mil/genbios2.nsf/... (copyright does not apply to .mil domains) that had his information from a search done just prior to his 'noteriety.' My operating assumption is that the Marine Corps are attempting to officially distance themselves from his active disagreement with the Commander in Chief. Jongleur 01:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Apostolic

message: This needs to be a disambiguation page, Apostolic is also a synonym for Oneness Pentecostal Jasoninkid
The origin of the word apostel is explained here as "Send one". In that word combination, "send" (with a d) can only be an imperative  (a command or instruction, as in "Do this, do that"). So, if a Greek king asked his servant to send a messenger, and the servant would ask whether he should send one messenger or two, the king could answer: "Apostel!" (Send one). 
It seems more likely to me that the word 'apostle' can be translated as "Sent one" (a person that has been sent). 
Anyone that knows New-Testament Greek? Johan Lont 08:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Shannon (American singer)

message: I'm the Real Shannon, Grammy Nominated, Int'l Recording Artist, Queen of Dance, Electronica and Freestyle.  My request for the changes will add references that will support accuracy.  Some of my accomplishments Soundtracks, IMDB: shannon (ix),  Shannon Wall Of Fame"video sent this morning via "We Transfer".
remove (the British korean Singer Shannon).  Only I own the rights to exploit the name "Shannon" professionally in the music business.
Therealshannon (talk) 15:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done. As you already know, since you were previously advised on your talk page, your claim that you are the sole musician with the right to the name "Shannon" is absurd. RunnyAmiga (talk) 15:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2016 