Talk:Chilean Americans

message: Unless the criterion for becoming a Chilean-American is having visited the country at least once, most of the people listed here are Chileans, not Chilean-Americans. Beto Cuevas? Don Francisco? Leonor Varela? Etc? Even the articles about these people don't claim they're -Americans.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.106.45.119 (talk) 06:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't agree more. Seems that it's only necessary to apear once or couple of times on american TV to start naming them "chilean-american". --194.203.215.254 (talk) 09:21, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Many of these supposed Chilean-Americans are no such thing

message: Please consider contributing to the article entitled History of Latinos and Hispanics. Thank you! --JuanMuslim  1m 02:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History of Latinos and Hispanics

message: Can anybody please add a template with pictures of a selected few Chilean Americans? I suggest placing Claudio Arrau, Isabel Allende, Ariel Dorfman, Mario Kreutzberger (Don Francisco), and Jorge Garcia on the template. I would do this myself except I lack the skills to create such a thing. Come on people! The Sporty Jew (talk) 01:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: In case anyone knew, Snooki (Nicole Polizzi) of Jersey Shore was born in Chile...but was raised by her adoptive Italian American parents. She would qualify in the list of famous Chilean-Americans, in addition being a pop cultural icon here in the USA and the world. I suggest we include a pic of her in the article when there's a consciousness met among us in Wikipedia. 
Polizzi is Chilean (of Italian Chilean descent),|'The View' Showdown: Joy Behar vs. 'Jersey Shore'
Jennifer Graham Kizer ON Feb 23, 2010 at 3:28PM, IVillage
71.102.18.28 (talk) 19:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: ~No confirmation as to Beto Cuevas being a Chilean American, his biography refers to him as being a Canadian citizen.Selecciones de la Vida (talk) 04:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits

message: An editor recently deleted sourced, referenced information on the ancestory of chileans, and substituted it with unsourced material.  This issue is worthy of discussion before further edits.  The issue is also discussed at Talk:Chilean_people#Ancestral_and_ethnic_composition:_What_a_pathetic_joke. It would be useful for all editors with an opinion to chime in.  --Work permit (talk) 19:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancestory

message: A few days ago that User: C.Kent87 has changed the origin information on the Chilean population, alluding to his edit summaries to be "this wording is being fair to both sides" and mentioning that Chileans are mostly mestizos, although exposed references in the article say the opposite.  . Ccrazymann (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You must not be able to read. I put that most Chileans were Mestizo and White. That is what the sources say. You want to say that most Chileans are only white - That is destructive because you are tweaking what the SOURCES say. "Most" chileans are not white. Have you ever seen a documentary on Chile? Even of a phenotypical level, you can see Indian admixture in most. But since you want to pretend that Chile is a white country, because your in some sort of race with Argentina (and losing), you tweak references. We will work on this, though. C.Kent87 (talk) 04:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Destructive changes

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chilean_American&diff=prev&oldid=419049203#Chilean_American_population_centres
The old figures show great discrepancies versus the new figures, wonder what caused it: Oklahoma; Detroit and Michigan; and Palm Desert, Cal. was omitted or removed, but these states and cities might be estimates without reliable sources to back them (any Chilean American societies?) and apparently rounded to the nearest number for a whole region. 71.102.21.238 (talk) 16:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old 2000 Census population figures 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chilean Americans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140815134909/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chilean Americans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100706073304/http://www.lagenealogy.com/Biographies/biosA.htm to http://www.lagenealogy.com/Biographies/biosA.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080622010408/http://www.chile.com/tpl/articulo/detalle/ver.tpl?cod_articulo=68730 to http://www.chile.com/tpl/articulo/detalle/ver.tpl?cod_articulo=68730
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There has been spate of rollbacks by User:RichardWeiss to the articles , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and .
These have been undone, since:
* the editor failed to provide any rationale
* the editor deleted sourced content
If you wish to engage in constructive behavior (e.g. questioning the validity of sources), a good place to start would be on the talk pages of the respective articles. Resorting to random drive-by reverts is generally considered unhelpful. Thanks.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.252.4.106 (talk) 11:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The same highly controversial paragraph has been spammed into 16 different articles. I don't consider the encyclopedia.com source reliable, the article dabs are very poor and the whole paragraph bordering on racist. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 15:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Unexplained removal of sourced content