Talk:Henry, son of Robert I of Burgundy

message: Can someone provide more information on comment "The name of his wife is unknown (that it was Sibil has been discredited)...".  I have a source 'Royalty for Commoners' by Roderick Stuart that indicates the following: 
'Line 85-30.  Henry, Duke of Burgundy, heir apparent of the Duchy of Burgundy; b. c1035; d. 27 Jan 1070/74; md c1056 Sibylle (Sybilla) of Barcelona, d. 6 July 1074; dau of Raymond Berenger I (54-33), Count of Barcelona and Gisela of Lluca.  Henry and Sibylle were parents of Henry I of Burgundy (85-30).  Henry was son of Helie de Semur (85-31) and Robert I of Burgandy (154-33).
Line 245-32.  Henry I, Duke of Burgundy; b. c1035; d. 27 Jan 1070/74; md Sibylle of Barcelona, b. c1035; d. 6 July 1074; bur Eglise St. Etienne, Besancon; dau Raymond Berenger I (54-33) and (3) Gisela of Lluca (85-30).  Henry and Sibylle were parents of Eudes I Borel (245-31). Henry was son of Robert I of France (245-33, 154-33) and Helie de Semur (85-31).'
Andaleen 17:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  I have another source that says there is some uncertainty about her name but claims she's the daughter of Berenguer Ramon I, Count of Barcelona .  Its a genealogical website but this one is usually fairly conservative guessing famous fathers for wives. DavidRF (talk) 21:35, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

text: The original source that led to this name being assigned to Henry's wife was a charter naming 'Duchess Sybil'. Since Henry never succeeded to the title, this can't be his wife.  There is no other known document that either names Henry's wife, or provides the least indication of her ancestry.  It also should be added that Stuart's Royalty for Commoners does not represent a scholarly genealogical source, having been scourged by numerous reviewers for being sloppy, inaccurate and uncritical, and should not be used as a WP:RS. Agricolae (talk) 00:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Identity of Wife

message: The individual is non-notable, a genealogical placeholder, and so I have merged this page with his father, Robert I, Duke of Burgundy.
. . . on second thought, following merger, this page converted to disambiguation. Agricolae (talk) 01:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged 

message: Considering the historical importance of this character in the genealogical history of both the Burgundian and Portuguese royal houses, I feel that his presence is necessary as a separate entry. His lack of titles does not disqualify him as a relevant historical figure. Simply being a member of the Capetian dynasty is usually enough to warrant an article. For some reason Henry of Burgundy has been denied this. Three of his children rose to prominence with a four becoming a bishop. He was the grandson of a French king in the male line. I've expanded the article somewhat from its former version and I've added a more reliable and relevant primary source for the citation regarding his wife and his own existence. I hope this justifies this article's existence. If not, I'll see if I can dig up anything else about him. At least now the Robert I, Duke of Burgundy article doesn't have a crowded family history section as it did previously. That much information deserves its own page.–Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 08:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Reinstated