Talk:Anticon

message: I just made a fairly sizeable edit, although in actuality, it was really just a ton of small (slightly nitpicky) edits. Basically, I:
* Rearranged, reworded, rewrote, and expanded stuff
** Redid intro section, almost rewrote whole thing
** Updated and expanded projects section
* I updated the "current roster" 
** Took out artists who haven't released stuff in a long time (not really "active" anymore then)
** Added a few artists who've recently become "active" by releasing new material, and added new artist (sole and the skyrider band)
* Updated "See also" section
** Added Abstract Hip Hop link, put it on top (since it links back to anticon, and also links to several other labels similar to anticon, like Def Jux and Rhymesayers)
** Added link on Indie rock, since some of the material anticon has put out recently is indie rock
Hopefully nobody protests these changes too much. If you disagree with something I did, please don't revert the whole edit; change the individual thing yourself.Shnakepup 06:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redid some stuff... 

message: In the list of artists that "are or have been closely associated with anticon", it lists Mike Patton. What has he done with anticon.? I was interested to hear it and did a bit of searching and couldn't find anything. This would surely imply he wasn't "closely associated".Febodyed 13:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mike Patton appeared on Odd Nosdam's Burner. That alone probably doesn't constitute "close association", but it's something. — TheJames 14:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closely associated? 

message: Should Alias & Ehren be in the list? --Anthony5429 14:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concure. Group or just a collaboration, Alias & Tarsier deserve some attention as well. LetterGo 03:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alias & Ehren 

message: :Image:Logo.anticon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo.anticon.jpg

message: :Image:Logo.anticon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo.anticon.jpg

message: i just corrected the record on why sole left, and who started the label.  it is often said that "everyone" is a co-founder and in reality the label was started by sole and pedestrian and didn't become incorporated until 2003(legally it is a corporation not a collective). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.227.45.218 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 9 August 2012‎ (UTC)
:I can't find the source about "the label was started by sole and pedestrian and didn't become incorporated until 2003." Please do not add any information without reliable sources. --122.26.254.96 (talk) 04:08, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Kayo, you're skating a very thin line here. I'm not pursuing a range block because you've been editing constructively, even though you are acting in defiance of Wikipedia policy. I hope you keep it up. Chubbles (talk) 06:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sole

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anticon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060329194250/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/feature.php?ID=129 to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/feature.php?ID=129
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anticon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120609195750/http://synthesis.net/2008/07/09/anticon-records-why-announces-tour-dates/ to http://synthesis.net/2008/07/09/anticon-records-why-announces-tour-dates/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified