lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Grissom Air Reserve Base

message: This article rather cryptically states: 
"From the early 1970s, the wing supported worldwide tanker task forces by deploying KC-135 aircraft to Europe, Alaska, Greenland, and the Pacific. In 1975, the 3d ACCS was inactivated and its specialized EC-135s were transferred to the 70th Air Refueling Squadron."
In addition to the tanking mission, the 305th also operated several EC-135L PACCS (Post Attack Command and Control System) aircraft from 1966 to 1992. As the name implies, these communications relay aircraft were a part of SAC's post-attack infrastructure that would have allowed the command to continue communicating with its assets in the event its primary communications systems were compromised by an enemy's first strike (basically a part of the Looking Glass mission performed in conjunction with other 135-based airborne command post aircraft). These aircraft were still fully capable tankers with, as I recall, the added capability to suck fuel as well as dispense it through the booms. The aircraft were originally assigned to the 3d ACCS, but as the article correctly states were passed onto the 70th ARS in the 70s.Jmdeur (talk) 17:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  EC-135L PACCS Radio Relay Aircraft/Mission 

message: @Pennsy22: No problem, and I don't mind what symbol appears in the wikitext for  (or the closely related ), but FYI my edit did not change anything in the output. When I fix convert errors I often "clean" the wikitext because people tend to copy existing templates and IMHO it is best to encourage use of easily typed characters in wikitext. Examples:
* →  
* →  
* →  
* →  
Johnuniq (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the hyphen, minus, en dash thing can be very confusing and I know a lot of people get them mixed up. I used to use the x instead of ×, but I do a lot of editing in Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships and they require × so I'm very used to it, and now I prefer it. The editor I use has it quick linked at the bottom of the editor screen so it's easy to get to. You did find a missing pipe in one of my conversion though, I went back and fixed it. Thanks Pennsy22 (talk) 05:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert output is MOS compliant
Talk:1950 Assam–Tibet earthquake

message: The text ist an exact copy from Richter, Charles F., 1958, Elementary seismology: San Francisco, W.H. Freeman and Company, 768 p. Though it is cited in (and presumably copied from) the USGS page, it is not free. AFAIK, it must at least be marked as a verbatim copy or citation. Any other meanings? --Jo (talk) 14:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 
Talk:Assisi Vidyaniketan Public School

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
:Assisi Vidyaniketan →  – The correct name for this school is Assisi Vidyaniketan Public School. Regrettably, someone put a redirect in place on the article Assisi Vidyaniketan Public School to Assisi Vidyaniketan, requiring a technical move in order to merge the articles. There are several citations in the article Assisi Vidyaniketan providing evidence of its correct name. Rangasyd (talk) 12:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 April 2021
Talk:Athirajendra

message: * Please replace the name 'Chola' (சோள) that means the name of an eatable grain, with 'Chozha' (சோழ) which means the name of a king and/or his dynasty.Helppublic (talk) 10:12, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

message: Introduction and pre-Bilhana para has same repeating paragraphs till "Rajendra bide his time". Please remove repeats Senthilkumaras (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete/ Edit repeated paragraphs  

message: Please some body provide evidence for "Rajendra Chalukya" name used in the page. Occasional switching over to maternal lineage had taken place in all great European and Mongol dynasties, and even in Western Chalukyas, Pandyas (Malaiyadwaja -- Queen Meenakshi), and Sinhalese dynasties. It's just a vengeful hatred towards Cholas to include the name of a sworn enemy in the royal title, changing to wordsalads like Chalukya-Chola and Rajendra-Chalukya.
If no Tamil inscription evidences are provided it is better to remove such idiotic combos in titles. IMHO Senthilkumaras (talk) 02:52, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need evidence for "Rajendra Chalukya" name
Talk:Athirappilly Falls

message: The coordinates 10°21′N 76°33′E (| lat_d = 10.35| long_d = 76.55) are way off.
I replaced them with the actual coordinates 10°17'4.77"N 76°34'7.85"E (| lat_d = 10.28465833| long_d = 76.56884722).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manveroo (talk • contribs) 09:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: Copy editing of the article was done. Two new photographs of Athirappilly waterfalls have been added. Introduced many new sections in this article & added detailed info in each section, with references. 
I hope that now the Copy-edit tag can be removed by administrator. BGM 18:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy editing
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mesoamerica/Citations

message: I've made several templates that are similar to APA style. I could list them here if you like. --Ling.Nut 01:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Ling.Nut - sure, feel free to list them.--cjllw | TALK 13:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Harvcol, Harvrefcol templates
Talk:Atul Kochhar

message: It was obvious that this article has been carefully edited and created to possibly suit the person in question, i.e. PR purposes. I've cleaned it up a lot but it still needs more work to become encyclopedic. 31.49.87.57 (talk) 12:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   Marketing / Conflict of Interest 

message: Please note that the riot around the offensive tweet is already covered in the section "Restaurant". There is no need to have the info double in the article. The Banner talk 17:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riot about tweet 

message: The article says "Kochhar was one of the first two Indian chefs to receive a Michelin star". Does this mean he was the first, the second, or was awarded it at exactly the same time as another Indian chef? MIDI (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It says that he was one of the first Indian chefs to receive a Michelin star, without a statement if he was first, second, third, fourth or fifth or ex aequo. The Banner talk 18:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michelin star
Talk:Rick Adduono

message: Removed the ChicagoWikiProject banner.  The article does not mention any ties to the city. Pknkly (talk) 04:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't fight a bot.  Must be the reference to St. Catharines Black Hawks.  Pknkly (talk) 23:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from Wiki Chicago Project
Talk:Iron oxide

message: No mention of cosmetic use or controlled environment production of iron oxides, so I added it. I also added a link to the U.S. Geological Survey. I'm new to this. Hope you don't mind my inclusions.
LorraineP 16:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cosmetic Use

message: This article seems misleading.  In most cases, oxides of commonly used metals such as iron, nickel, chromium and aluminium, under conditions where they are stable, protect the metals against further corrosion.  This explains the stability of non-noble metals such as stainless steel, titanium and aluminium.  It is hydroxides, chlorides, etc. that cause harmful corrosion.  Iron that has been heated so that it becomes coated with oxides tends to be protected from rust.  David R. Ingham 01:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrosion 

message: As there are already articles for most of the iron oxides I propose that one should only give a rough entry (e.g. crystal structure, colour etc.) to each of the oxides and then link with the other articles. This article would look more homogenous that way. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CharonZ (talk • contribs) 16:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring? 

message: Ferric oxides are increasingly used in biogas plants for the purpose of reducing the contents of sulphur.
Sulphur is very harmful for internal combustion engines used in Biogas plants and driven by biogas.
I will welcome a more deeply explanation for this topic and this use of ferric oxides.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.62.37.194 (talk) 11:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferric Oxides as an sulphur reduction agent 

message: Two formulæ appear next to some species in the list.  At present this is confusing, and not explained.
— DIV (128.250.80.15 (talk) 09:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formulæ 

message: Hi, I found out from the technical sales guy at Dessicare that the oxygen busters that they use in food products have iron in them which oxidises over time and then becomes Iron Oxide II and Iron Oxide III - I would like to know if this can be added to soil in my garden (and everyone's gardens) and if it is fine to do so. The main purpose is to promote some reuse of the oxygen busters (but cutting them open to get the iron out) as the are so prolific now and I hate that they cannot be recycled at all. Any help appreciated. Plmoknqwerty (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: oxides in oxygen busters ?

message: Something could be said in this article about iron oxides causing the color of red soils such as ultisols. – ℜob C. alias ALAROB 14:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red soils 

message: Shouldn't we add a mention of the use of iron oxide for batteries? See Metal–air electrochemical cell#Iron. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 20:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Avadhuta

message: Why is the Mahānirvāṇatantraṃ section a biography of Woodroffe? The speculative origins of his pen name has nothing to do with Avadhuta.  Any objections to deleting the bulk of this section?Iṣṭa Devata (talk) 02:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Woodroffe

message: This page has (questionable) "technical" information, does not read like an encyclopedia but a religious guide, and contains original research and as such needs an overhaul. Ogress smash! 07:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've looked through the history, and it looks like it was more consistant and coherent a while back. This version has some problems but looks better than the current version. I propose reverting to it and improving again from there. Skyerise (talk) 14:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Lamella

message: This page is currently a redirect to lamellae, which has links to "lamellae [various]", which are generally short articles, the distinction of each of which is disputable.  Firstly, all these articles should all be at the singular "lamella", which I intend to fix.  Secondly, the structural concept of lamellae might as well be collected in one article at lamella. ENeville 01:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: Distinction between each disputable???? Are you crazy! A mushroom lamella, a lamella in a fish gill, a graphite lamella, and a lamella in a chloroplast all refer to hugely different structures that happen to share the same name. Furthermore, some of these articles have room for expansion – lamella (mycology), for example, needs to be expanded into a much larger article, as the pattern of attachment of lamellae to the stipe is extremely important in identifying agarics. Peter G Werner 03:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merges

message: The 'merge craziness' versus a more proper balance betweeen: Integration versus Differentiation,....was out and about when I found the merge tags on the (at that time) four main "Lamella" articles. And I immediately removed the merge tags after reading the above two comments of 6 January 2007 and 14 October 2006. There are now up to six (6) articles on the Lamella disambiguation page.  --....A SonoranDesert fellow--Mmcannis (talk) 17:02, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History of "Lamella"
Talk:Ayodhya dispute

message: The reference to so called progressive international claiming it's fascism is completely pov pushing as supreme court has reviewed the archaeological evidences and then handed over the land to the temple , meanwhile to reference makes it seem like as if the temple is built by demolishing something which existed there from beginning of history , whereas the truth is a temple existed there before an illegal mosque . So plz review it Abraca21 (talk) 05:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 17:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2024 

message: please change the word "Demolition to Deconstruction" since it is misleading... Truthsucker (talk) 06:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Please read the sources cited. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2024 

message: In this phrase:
 coming to power in the 11th century CE
please remove the CE.  An era indicator is needed for CE dates only when they're ambiguous: In general, omit CE or AD, except to avoid ambiguity or awkwardness, per WP:ERA.  The previous sentence says this happened "after the Guptas"; the previous section is entitled "Gupta period"; and the previous paragraph ends with an event in 450 CE.  Obviously an event after 450 CE was in a CE year, so "11th century" is unambiguous. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 22:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: for now: Unless others disagree. — Urro[talk][edits] 15:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2024
Talk:Azarethes

message: These words "Azarethes (Greek: Ἀζαρέθης), also recorded as Exarath (Ἑξαράθ) and Zuraq" must be Grecized and Arabized (Zuraq) forms of a Middle Persian word, but the patterns are strange. Does anyone have more info on his name? (more variations, etc?) --Z 11:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Z: Could "Zuraq" possibly be the Arabized form of "Suhrab/Sohrab"? since the Georgian form is "Zurab" --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Suhrab is unrelated based on the rules of sound changes in Arabic, moreover, Suhrab is a relatively recent form if I'm not mistaken, and the earlier variants are Suxrāb/Surxāb also recorded in New Persian (I'm not quite sure about this though, and more research needs to be done). --Z 19:04, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Bipin Chandra Joshi

message: provide a source for his mysterious death!Super48paul (talk) 10:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  death 
Talk:B. B. Lal

message: Recently, a phrase stating that Lal is more commonly referred to as BB (or B.B.) was removed.  Why?  This is the way he is generally referred to.  Also, since there is apparently a politician named BB Lal, this should be briefly mentioned and clarified beyond the otherwise maybe a bit confusing "Not to be confused with..." that is currently in the article.Kdammers (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  BB 

message: There a lot of photographs of the man.  I don't know all the ins and outs of fair use, but some-one who does might be able to choose one of the many  ones on the Internet  that is allowable and add it to our article. Kdammers (talk) 17:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: Regarding
Times of India actually says
This is not a validation of Lal's claim that a Hindu temple structure was found. Nor does the ToI say that the SC " effectively reject[ed] the historical revisionist claim." That's the opinion of the editor, that is, OR. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 17:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only that, the source doesn't mention Lal. Any source on the topic would have to directly mention Lal and the effect of the ruling on opinions of his work. Otherwise it is WP:SYNTHESIS. The other sources at least mention Lal!. Skyerise (talk) 09:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supreme Court 

message: Why is bb Lal's stance on ayodhya considered controversial but stance of pro babri historians is not reported as such?
Pro babri historians changed their positions multiple times. In 1980s, it was that Babri was built on vacant land. After excavation, they changed their stance that it was built on buddhist/jain site and some saying on another mosque.
Also, after discovery of Vishnu Hari inscription, pro Babri historians said it was stolen from Lucknow museum without providing any evidence
Factpineapple (talk) 07:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the stance of BB Lal considered controversial and stance of BMAC historians not? 

message: We should also give each person their own talk page, rather than one redirecting to the other, but that's best left until we confirm the article titles. Certes (talk) 09:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page
Talk:Irish Air Corps

message: Please see Talk:Irish_Naval_Service#Requested_move_28_August_2020. – Fayenatic London 09:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 August 2020 

message: Meanwhile there are 4 PC-12NG in service: 1 in standard configuration as the current link shows, 3 modified Spectre 
https://flyinginireland.com/2020/09/irish-air-corps-new-pc-12s-arrive-in-baldonnel/
Can anybody update the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.131.73.206 (talk) 22:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC-12
Talk:Baa Bahoo Aur Baby

message: I have removed the character profiles. Wikipedia does not stand for POV character profiles. If the list of characters is put back, it should be done so without the profiles, and most preferably with the names of the actors --Maurice45 (talk) 16:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: There is none whatsoever, especially in the "Success" section  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.201.66.146 (talk) 16:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Baansi

message: Bhatbamnda one of thikana in {M.P.} for shaktawat  { Ranveer singh shaktawat- 9926613143 }
THERE IS EIGHT BROTHER IN BHATBAMNDA [ M.P.]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.196.208.136 (talk) 17:06, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhatbamnda one of thikana in {M.P.} for shaktawat  { Ranveer singh shaktawat- 9926613143 }
Talk:InterVideo

message: The overall article...
Also, a list of products and descriptions would be helpful. One can also make articles for those applications.--Eddie 01:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree this article needs improvements. Maybe a brief introduction of the founder, Steve Ro, a list of its products and some information of its competitors. Maybe you can help, too? For product list and competitor list I can help, but for the information on its founder, I need someone else to help.--H.T. Chien / 眼鏡虎 (Discuss|Contributions) 06:50, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Improvement 
Talk:Bababudangiri shrine

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 18:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Badami Chalukya architecture

message: The dynasty may be called the Badami Chalukyas more often, but Early Chalukya architecture is much more common, or "Early Chalukyan architecture". There is also the "Calukya" spelling, but let's ignore that. Ghit comparisons are tricky, affected by variants like "Early Chalukya style", and Wikipedia mirrors/copies. All the best authors use some form of "Early" in their term, and actually have always done so. Johnbod (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Early Chalukya architecture]]
Talk:Bagdogra Airport

message: It maybe useful and informative for readers to know if there is any reason for the code IXB assigned (or if the reason is not known / random) 
64.233.173.57 (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for code IXB 
Talk:Baghdadi Jews

message: The opening paragraph is very confusing and overly long. Does not make clear quickly the community's primary association with India and the Indian Ocean and South China Sea ports. Much of the first paragraph should be moved to create a new origins or early years section.
This has be done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Nahoum (talk • contribs) 01:47, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed! I came to this article by chance, and could not understand what it was about. I'm still not sure, so I didn't try to adjust the opening. I hope someone knowledgeable about the subject could fix it up... --IamNotU (talk) 22:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very confusing opening  

message: There is a clear case to divide the history into a pre-colonial, British colonial and post-colonila section.
This has been fixed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Nahoum (talk • contribs) 20:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The History should be divided 

message: I want to make the references look good, but when I click the edit zone they appear not to be there. Please advise! User:David Nahoum
:The references are in-line with the text and start with <ref>.  Please read this before you start, formatting and structuring references can be difficult. Regards  Velella  Velella Talk   23:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, "capsule links" is not a term I am familiar with. Your addition of a link which you have numbered 31 is not appropriate and is not how Wikipedia manages its references. In the reference list, the references indices are generated from the in-line references. Regards  Velella  Velella Talk   23:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

text: Sorry, but this isn't a topic that I know anything about. In cases like this this I am simply monitoring compliance with Wikipedia standards and norms - the content passes me by !  Velella  Velella Talk   08:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeking Help on References