lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Robert Treat

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.thirteen.org/newark/history.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 03:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Very low-density lipoprotein

message: I WANT A PICTURE OF A VLDL >:-(  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.249.30.23 (talk) 22:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needed 

message: This is probably the most ludicrously obscure example I have ever seen, and I am incredibly ambiguous about it. Initially it seems like a much better idea to use a more common example, but what actually happened with me is I followed the link and learned some cool factoids about a peptide hormone that I had never heard of before, which is a good thing. It seems like a dumb idea, but then it seems like a great idea! I'm just wondering what others think of an example like this? Dcs002 (talk) 18:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian hedgehog? 
Talk:Chylomicron

message: Is there any information available on the formation of chylomicrons in the enterocytes themselves? are they constructed in special compartments, or do they get assembled in the cytosol? Furthermore how do they get secreted into the lacteals, what exact mechanisms allow them to pass the basolateral cell membrane? 
Thanks to anyone willing to answer those questions form me :)  78.53.121.91 (talk) 16:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chylomicron formation?
Talk:Serum protein electrophoresis

message: Clinically relevant and important test used to rule in or out mylomas, as well as other disorders.  Would be good to keep it as a separate page or a large heading under the general protein electrophoresis page. CJVance 20:39, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is a duplicated of Protein electrophoresis. 
Bubbletruble (talk) 08:53, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Protein electrophoresis 

message: ... in JAMA doi:10.1001/jama.2014.8237 JFW | T@lk 00:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation
Talk:Kilkieran

message: Does anybody know this place by the name "Kilkieran"? As far as I, and thousands upon thousands of other English speaking people outside this area know the place, it is Cill Chiaráin, and Cill Chiaráin alone. Why, when this is its common name in English thanks to at least the Irish college, has somebody made up an anglicisation for it? 109.77.115.196 (talk) 00:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is inappropriate and incorrect to represent this place by the anglicization. How can we change the main title of the article? Glas.A.Chan (talk) 17:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Cill Chiaráin
Talk:HMG-CoA reductase

message: How does it work? What is the reductant.  This is effectively a 4 electron reduction from a carboxylate to an alcohol but the article never really mentions this.  Surely this is relevant to the function of statins.  Pelirojopajaro (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanism
Talk:Sequence database

message: The Many inputs create inconsistencies section is overly extensive relative to the rest of the subject matter (or more accurately, there is a paucity of material defining what the value and content of sequence databases are).  Better article would describe more of the general contents and the methodologies used in populating and managing sequence databases, their value and use in a wide range of biology research, and integration of sequence databases with other biological databases.  Standards used, where the data is drawn from:  high thruput experiments, sequencing centers, individual research projects, and the 'deposit to publish' agreement among journals that has help spur database submissions.  
Dongilbert 01:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  unbalanced article 

message: Protein structure database and Sequence database are rather close and interleaved concepts. Both articles are stubbish, unreferenced and vague. I would suggest to merge the narratives  and split the list of databases into a separate page. Last Lost (talk) 19:14, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would disagree.  Although the articles are not that great they are seperate enough and notable enough to warrant articles.  Also though perhaps list articles might be more appropriate. Alexbateman (talk) 16:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion
Talk:Human Protein Reference Database

message: PTMs are mentioned 3 times, but never described.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Originalname37 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does PTM stand for? 

message: http://www.ibioinformatics.org/more_resources.php Originalname37 (Talk?) 00:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The text looks a lot that that found here: 
Talk:Bangladesh Standard Time

message: Can anyone tell the actual 'Name' of 'Time Zone' of Bangladesh?
Is it 
BST = Bangladesh Standard Time ? 
or 
BDT = Bangladesh Time?
With is Correct? 
Thanks 
Bauani (talk) 07:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: BST or BDT

message: Bangladesh Standard Time (BST) is more commonly used and should be treated as the correct specification. Note that this terminology is supported by authoritative Bangladeshi sources including Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Bangladesh , Parliament of Bangladesh  as well as reputed international sources like IBM  and BBC . The only remarkable use of the abbreviation "BDT" to refer to the time zone that I could find is from world time zones website  but I doubt whether this is a reliable source. 
While "Bangladesh Time" can be treated as an acceptable alternative for "Bangladesh Standard Time", the abbreviation BDT is unquestionably reserved by ISO to represent the currency (Bangladesh Taka) . Hence, to avoid confusion while refering to the time zone Bangladesh Standard Time (BST) is the more appropriate use. Regards, Arman (Talk) 09:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply
Talk:Beatrice, Countess of Arundel

message: has provided a source for a 1447 death date, but the URL mentioned in the edit summary shows that this date is for the other Beatrice, the one linked with the Fettiplace family. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I messed this up. I only started to poke around here when I saw the disagreement between the birth year in the article text and the one in the category list. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks.  I'm still uncertain but I got the 1439 date from http://www.genealogics.org a reputable website subject to scrutiny by many medieval genealogists. Jamesdowallen (talk) 08:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date
Talk:Berengaria of Portugal

message: Acording to this site this is true... I wonder if there is anyone here whom has knowledge about this. Acidburn24m 21:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the author meant descendent. imars (talk) 10:31, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

text: If Wikipedia is to be believed, the genealogy presented in the Website runs into problems with Alfonso VI of Leon and Castille. Teresa was his daughter by his mistress and not by the Moorish princess Zaida. Personal genealogy websites do not make good sources. I would ignore it and try for more verifiable sources. imars (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Berengária of Portugal a decadent of prophet Muhammad 

message: Someone should upload this image of her from here or here.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 21:36, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Someone should expand this article a little with the three sources from Medieval Danish Families on the bottom.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 17:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Dynaco

message: I had the opportunity to build and use a PAT-4 and Stereo-80 back in the early 70s. The Stereo-80 was so-so as it had some built in noise somewhere I could never eradicate. I still miss that PAT-4, though. Nice preamp. Phyllis1753 19:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PAT-4 &amp; Stereo-80

message: Inactivity since merger was proposed establishes implied consensus to keep Dynaquad article.  Removing:
*from Dynaco 
*from Dynaquad 
Conrad T. Pino (talk) 06:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014 November Merge Proposal Removed
Talk:Carlos Francisco Chang Marín

message: Added him to Marin, List of painters by name, and List of Panamanians. Black Kat 22:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: i fixed as much as i could find regarding copy/edit and grammer. i'm no expert so i might have missed some in-depth things that could make it look more professional, but at least it's now 100% readable. an expert is needed to best deal with the super-massively-long run-on sentences i couldn't figure out what to do with. and there's way too many fanciful and colorful adjectives used.4.230.162.98 15:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy/Editing and Grammer
Talk:Methionine synthase

message: There seems to be an obvious omission here, in that (in humans) we give on indication of where in the body the enzyme operates, this is key information for non-expert viewers of the encylopedia.
Secondly I have heard n passing fromn an 'expert source' that this enzyme is stimulated by TetraIodothyronine rather than Tri-iodthryonine (unusual) if somebody can confirm this and is aware of a source - this would be key information.  Clearly it cannot be included until a suitabe source is found.
Leopardtail (talk) 13:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location Location Location.
Talk:Reverse genetics

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File: will be appearing as picture of the day on January 18, 2020. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2020-01-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:{{Remove file prefix|ReverseGeneticsFlu.svg}}]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: History is missing, in particular when the term was coined, and who was the first to coin it. I tried to get the timeline of reverse vaccinology correct, so I wanted to know when reverse genetics was first coined, but wikipedia did not answer this question. :( 2A02:8388:1641:8380:0:0:0:6 (talk) 13:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Rossaveal

message: The name should be changed to Ros a' Mhíl, as this is the Irish name in this gaeltacht region ==86.45.97.29 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 00:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The official name of the area is Ros an Mhíl, the current name of the article is an unofficial and rarely used Anglicization. Road signs in the area itself do not use the name Rossaveal, and neither should this article.
:Your rarely used anglization has about 9 time more hits on Google than the Gaelic name. We still have to adhere to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) The Banner talk 22:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 
Talk:Brooklyn Botanic Garden

message: The sidebar of this article describes the Garden as being "within Prospect Park". The body of the article contradicts this, saying it's within Mount Prospect Park, but actually that doesn't seem right to me either. Mount Prospect Park is 7.79 acres, but according to https://www.bbg.org/about/history the garden is 52 acres. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Prospect_Park says Mount Prospect Park "shares a parcel of land" with the Botanic Garden and other institutions but it's not clear to me in what sense this is true. Looking at https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/mount-prospect-park/map it seems like NYC Parks only considers the northwest corner to be Mount Prospect Park. (They describe it as "nestled between Brooklyn's [...] institutions, namely [...] Brooklyn Botanic Gardens".) The BBG history page describes the creation of the park as due to an act by the state legislature reserving 39 acres for it. Could we add a citation?
Glasserc (talk) 15:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In the end I decided to fix it myself. If you're using the BBL search tool from the NYC Department of Finance, this is all within borough 3 (Brooklyn) obviously, block 1183. The lot for Mount Prospect Park is lot 8. Lot 1 is the majority of the Botanic Garden. I believe lot 30 is the parking lot or maybe the visitor's center. Although all of these lots are listed as "owned" by NYC Parks, none clearly surrounds the other so I don't think it's fair to say it is "in" any park. Glasserc (talk) 18:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Within Prospect Park? 

message: I was going to review this, and even started to, but to be honest, TL;DNR (Too Long; Did Not Review).  I will leave some comments here, however.  There's a lot of repetition.  For example, the lead mentions structures in each of its three paragraphs.  You mention "The Celebrity Path was created in 1985" under "1980s and 1990s", then again with "A Celebrity Path. added in 1985" under "Other gardens and landscape features".  You've got several sentences about the Steinhardt Conservatory in "1980s and 1990s", then a whole section about it later on.  Much the same with the Palm House.  And again for the Cranford Rose Garden, which we're told in two different places was opened in 1928.  I think this would benefit from coalescing all the information about a given section of the garden into one place rather than spreading it out and duplicating it throughout the article. RoySmith (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comments Roy. Yeah, it is kind of long, although that's because it's had a fairly long history. I've tried to reduce the repetition, although I felt some repetition was necessary because of its length. Since the dates are already given in the history section, I just removed them from the individual "Specialty gardens and collections" sections. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some GA-ish comments
Talk:Ernest Emerson/Archive 1

message: Old discussions should not be deleted - but archived.  Old comments do have their uses and you can't be accused of cover-up.Peter Rehse 09:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Older entries

message: Please do not place advertorials into this online encyclopedia.  Also, remember that you do not own any Wikipedia article, whether or not you started it, think you started it, did a lot of editing to it, or you have a long-term personal relationship with the subject.  Please see WP:OWN. Cheers, Sam 20:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other older entries

message: For reference, here is the peer review, which is hidden in a drop-down on those silly templates.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review
Talk:Joseph Kahn (journalist)

message: Hello, User:Fuzheado , User:Melcous or User:Alessandro.colombo.2 or User:Therequiembellishere or User:83d40m or User:SdkbBot or User:MapacheAmistoso. My name is Charlie Stadtlander, I work in the New York Times Communications department and am writing to suggest several updates to this entry based on developments in Mr. Kahn's career.
1) During his time as managing editor of The New York Times, Kahn drove The Times’s digital transformation including remaking the newsroom’s editing structure, shaping its “Live” desk (citation: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/joe-kahn-new-york-times-profile.html ) and leading the global expansion of its newsroom in hubs like London and Seoul. (citation: https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-times-appoints-joseph-kahn-executive-editor-11650372579 )
2) Kahn co-led efforts to improve diversity, equity and inclusion in The Times’s newsroom.  (citation: https://apnews.com/article/business-beijing-new-york-times-co-dean-baquet-joseph-kahn-2cc9925998ec4df7fbe99a5c10074642)
3) According to an interview after he was named Executive Editor, Kahn plans to “evolve the culture” at The Times to make sure that employees from different racial backgrounds want to stay there long term. (citation: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-22/new-top-editor-at-the-n-y-times-sees-growth-beyond-the-coasts?srnd=premium&sref=CyorAPSA )
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlieStadtlander (talk • contribs) 19:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates Suggested 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at :Talk:Joseph Kahn#Requested move 19 April 2022.   talk 14:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Related requested move

message: Hi Joseph 
Hope you well. I have a crazy story you might be interested in. To do with me signing the contracts in mountgomery Alabama for Niorman Swarskof.im an irishman  and Norman was my friend in Qatar...Long story.. if you are u please mail me back. Thanks f 86.43.75.200 (talk) 18:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storm Normin
Talk:Talk About (game show)

message: I was watching talkabout recently. I'm videotaping it too, by the way. I watched an episode in which Barb was talking about Merignue and got $800 and took the money knowing that Stripes, her partner, would attempt to say one of those words anyway to see what might have happened. As for winning five games, teams can win over $1,000 worth of merchandise. I head it from Wayne Cox's mouth. Trust me.--E2e3v6 (talk) 00:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talkabout Gameplay 

message: I'm trying to decide when the show debuted. 1988 or 1989? I think Wayne said that the show ran for two seasons. Here's a source: http://mysite.verizon.net/reszuh21/waynecox.html. The link is not dead. Check it out. --E2e3v6 (talk) 21:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1988 or 1989?
Talk:Michael Beinhorn

message: Someone needs to change the tone of this article. First of all it’s clearly written by a white male considering the music they use adjectives like “legendary” and “iconic” to describe, like white name artists such as nine inch nails and sound garden, and of course discriminating against any artist that isn’t white male like Hole, Grand Master Flash, etc. 
Encyclopedias are supposed to be dry and scientific-like. An album that was made 30 years ago like “downward spiral” you have no way of knowing if it will be legendary or fade out of favor and sounding dated. Why isn’t Hole’s “celebrity skin” legendary? It sold approximately as much as nine inch nails. Oh yeah, because most white males have foaming at the mouth hatred and venom for Courtney Love for no other reason than their ignorance misogyny and sexism. 
It needs to be objective, not sound like a fanboy writing about his favorite albums.  It’s also especially painful when you can predict favor/disfavor based on race and sex. 2600:1012:B11B:98AF:C1B5:808A:6E3F:D1D (talk) 18:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Mmm mmm 2600:6C54:4500:7DFC:88DF:3F32:FCD4:590B (talk) 05:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written; bias language
Talk:Cellular life

message: Isn't this the same content as in the cell (biology) article? A8UDI 18:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Why is there copyright information on this page? Isn't that against the whole point of wikipedia? dude1818 (talk) 16:58, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright info
Talk:Margo Jefferson

message: A biographical article includes childhood, background, personal life, etc.
A cv, such as might be submitted in support of a job application, is primarily a list of achievements.
This article is in the latter category.
Perhaps articles about people should be divided into those that are worthy of a would-be (*) encyclopaedia and those that better belong on a publicity site, perhaps something like wikipromotion.com.
(*) Would-be, because as long as self-promotion are a substantial part of the content about living people this is not well described as an encyclopaedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.71.163 (talk) 08:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography or cv?
Talk:Membrane biology

message: Should this page be combined with "Cell membrane"? If we're looking to emphasize membrane biophysics instead, perhaps rename the page to be "Membrane Biophysics". If focusing on membrane biophysics, some improvement could include expansion on each of the areas already mentioned: quantitative information and modeling of lipid raft formation, rates of lipid and cholesterol flip-flop, protein-lipid coupling, and the effect of bending and elasticity functions of membranes on inter-cell connections. Js3377 (talk) 02:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Areas of Expansion
Talk:Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law

message: I have moved the article to Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law which appears to be its correct name, and created a redirect at Campbell Law School. – ukexpat (talk) 18:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: The article gave me a very strong impression of being primarily written by someone affiliated with the organization in order to promote/advertise its services. I've stubbed-out the original research, primary sources and promotion, but the page needs close watchlisting. CorporateM (Talk) 20:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Jonathan Yardley

message: What edits I did were light-handed, or so I hope. Wasn't sure footnoting to the Amason.com entries for the bios of Exley and Lardner served the entry best, so I eliminated the notes thereof. The books themselves are in the bibiography section, with their respective ISBN numbers. AndreasKQ 03:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits and additions

message: Regarding this section, moved here:
:Yardley's “Hoagy Carmichael's Memories, Straight from the Heartland,” published in The Washington Post on September 3, 2007, was plagiarized by Tim Goeglein as “Hoagy Carmichael's songs reflect his deep roots in Bloomington, Indiana”."What was plagiarized", Fort Wayne News-Sentinel, 29 February 2008 (Accessed 3 March 2008) When Nancy Nall Derringer discovered Goeglein's plagiarism and revealed it at NancyNall.com on February 29th, 2008, Goeglein resigned his White House job as Deputy Director of the Office of Public Liaison within hours."Statement by the Press Secretary", Tim Goeglein, White House Press Release, 29 February 2008 (Accessed 3 March 2008)
Although well cited, I think it's too trivial to include, in this article. Yardley had nothing to do with the incident, it had no impact on him or his career. It should obviously be included in Tim Goeglein's article. If Yardley had gone on to use the incident for some other purpose (to attack the Bush Whitehouse, to advance his political views) it should be included - but Yardley was simply a victim of plagiarism. Green Cardamom (talk) 19:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bush Whitehouse plagiarism case