lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Royal Guard (Spain)

message: I would question the description of the role as "executive protection".  From what I can tell of the definition elsewhere on Wikipedia of that term, it seems a purely American term for bodyguard.  That is not what the Spanish Royal Guard is.  The guards are quite simply a royal guard.124.197.15.138 (talk) 09:32, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role? 

message: I can find no reference that says the Royal guard has a company from the Civil Guard as one of its unites. Please, provide a source for this claim.Marked4life (talk) 06:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil guard company
Talk:Netpolitik

message: wouldn't the same criticism apply to noopolitik?  if an entry for noopolitik exists, I think an entry for netpolitik should exist as well.  though perhaps it should be added to the neologisms page.
: Looking at Noo, Net, and Real politik, I'd actually reccomend merging them all into Realpolitik, since Noo and Net are forks or interpretations of Real, unless I'm forgetting my poli sci classes? Mbisanz (talk) 21:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, your right, I just didn't think these splinters of poli thought would ever be more than dictionary defs on their own.  But looking over google and google news, there does appear to be a body of literature at least for Netpolitik that would bear a good article.  Happy editing.  If you ever need help with formatting, etc feel free to drop me a line. Mbisanz (talk) 05:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Green library

message: Umm, incomplete sentences?  Yikes.  I don't have time to go through it right now (at work), but someone should have a look with an eye to repair the less than perfect grammar. 67.142.130.21 (talk) 00:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While we're still close to the time you created this... can you please add the page numbers for your citations? gren グレン 02:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page numbers 

message: Large portions of this article are not neutral under Wikipedia guidelines, especially the paragraphs in the 'Why are libraries becoming green?' section. I suggest we move to make these paragraphs (along with the rest of the article) as neutral as possible.
Esahr (talk) 22:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added POV tag 

message: Please use the reference style used in wikipedia Wikipedia:Cite, all the reference links are broken--Thorseth (talk) 07:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See "Sands 2002" and "Lamis2003" for an examples of the correct usage--Thorseth (talk) 08:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation problems 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Czerwone Gitary

message: The band was popular in GDR, I don't know anything about Western Germany, maybe you mean Polish immigrants?Xx234 (talk) 06:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rote Gitarren 
Talk:Housing Act of 1949

message: A request has been submitted to WikiProject United States for a new article to be created on the topic of Housing in the United States. Please join the discussion or consider contributing to the new article. Best regards, -- M2545 (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notification: [[Housing in the United States]]

message: — Assignment last updated by IconRomano (talk) 22:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Capstone Course in American Politics
Talk:List of Fairfax County Public Schools middle schools

message: ...why? This strikes me as a blatant attempt to circumvent the AFD process; there was solid consensus to delete in most of the associated AFDs. I'm tempted to nominate it. --Coredesat 05:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um... 
Talk:Materiality

message: I brought this here because it's probably not nearly as commonly used term as in accounting. It's probably too much of a dicdef for Wikipedia anyway. If someone knows anything about it we can move it to Wiktionary or merge it into the appropriate architecture article.:
:""Materiality" is also an architecture term
materiallity is also in management acounting
:Materiality refers to the material dimension present in architectural forms. The different expressive characteristics of each material play a role in the definition of architectural form, imparting it with the qualities of texture, color, touch and even sound. Stone, for example, can be synonimous of mass, stability and solitidity, while it can also signify safety and personify a relation with nature. 
:Materiality is also related with the study of tectonics in architecture.
Also this could use some verification that it is a legitimate term. Thanks - Taxman Talk 14:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Architecture

message: It has another meaning in these fields for which I don't have the capacity to make an article out of it, but see for instance T. Dant's 2004 book 'Materiality and Society' as an example of this. 158.223.181.84 (talk) 18:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sociology, Anthropology, etc.
Talk:National Association of Secondary School Principals

message: I'd like to propose the merger of these two articles.  Both need more independent sources to establish notability, which may or may not exist.  The two pages also need some serious wikification.  Together, I think that they may be notable, and especially the NASSP, but the incoming article doesn't appear to be notable in its own right. ~Gosox(55)(55) 03:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with [[National Association of Student Councils]] 

message: --Editor9988 (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Merged

message: --Editor9988 (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Merged

message: --Editor9988 (talk) 08:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Merged

message: Merged content from National Association of Student Councils to here.
Merged content from National Junior Honor Society to here.
Merged content from National Elementary Honor Society to here. LegoKontribsTalkM 01:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found this sitting on the article page
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Arts/Archive 1

message: Hello, I'm a member of the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors and came across an article for Spheres, a Korean animated series, which could use some clean up. I mistakenly classified it as anime at first. Thanks, *momoricks* (talk) 03:45, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Does Korean animation fall under your territory?

message: I'm opening a new, actually redug, post on the keeping or deleting of Infobox Korean Film over at Template Talk. Any thoughts would be appreciated. ₪RicknAsia₪ 05:23, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Korean Film 

message: I've suggested that this working group be marked as "Inactive" due to a lack of participation. If anyone is actively using this working group they may wish to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea#Status of WikiProject Korea working groups. Thanks! PC78 (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inactive?
Talk:Big Pit

message: The result was merge National Mining Museum of Wales into Big Pit and rename Big Pit National Coal Museum. -- Seth Whales (talk) 20:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decision to merge 

message: I believe the two articles National Mining Museum of Wales and Big Pit are virtually the same...they should be merged and renamed "Big Pit National Coal Museum", which is the official name on the website. Seth Whales 22:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Big Pit National Coal Museum

message: The result was merge National Mining Museum of Wales into Big Pit and rename Big Pit National Coal Museum. -- Seth Whales (talk) 20:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decision to merge 

message: I believe the two articles National Mining Museum of Wales and Big Pit are virtually the same...they should be merged and renamed "Big Pit National Coal Museum", which is the official name on the website. Seth Whales 22:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Cyclooxygenase-3

message: Found various articles on the net relating to this topic and listed them in the reference.sarindam7 (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles relating to this topic 

message: This article is linked to the same NCBI gene id as PTGS1  and 'COX3' is listed as another identifier for PTGS1.  It really seems like this is the same thing and should be in one article. It would be useful to mention why there are multiple numbered COX 'genes' in the article.. Benjamin Good (talk) 21:31, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The gene is spliced differently resulting in a different enzyme, at least that was the original claim. By now this is a historical episode and if research does not pick up we might reduce it to the historical narration. Right now I would wait and see what develops, if anything. Richiez (talk) 23:46, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with PTGS1 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostaglandin says: "A third form of COX, termed COX-3 is thought to exist in the brain and may be associated with relief of Headaches when on NSAID therapy."  The information on this page doesn't seem to be consistent with or contain that statement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.114.164.133 (talk) 01:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This was one thought but isn't true judging from what we know about COX-3 today. I removed the sentence from Prostaglandin. Thanks for catching this mistake! --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 07:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  role in headache relief?
Talk:Bromus interruptus

message: some pictures addedPlantsurfer (talk) 00:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Don't suppose you know where to find a non-copyright distribution map? Plantsurfer (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately not. If you know of a copyrighted one I believe you can re-make it into one of the wikipedia-type maps so long as it is referenced. DJLayton4 (talk) 01:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: To provide more detail, this species is reintroduced, and current BSBI distribution maps show recent sightings in Maidstone, Glastonbury and Carmarthen, so I don't think we can consider it extinct in the wild any more.Regularuk (talk) 15:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: in that case the citation is no longer appropriate, since that states it is extinct in the wild. Plantsurfer 15:15, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  changed status
Talk:Arthur et Robert

message: John ARTHUR, born in 1716 (Oswestry)Oswestry record came in France around 1750 with his brother Boyle ARTHUR. The company become Arthur et Grenard in 1770Archives Nationales de France, then Arthur et Robert only in 1789Archives Nationales de France. I think Boyle left France in 1770  Fichben (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthur et Robert
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/HarveyCarter

message: Another sockpuppet of HarveyCarter has arisen, without a Username, editing many of the same items with exact or near-exact phrasing.  He uses 172.142.186.188.  I've reverted a number of his edits, but am not sure how to address the absence of a Username in getting him blocked. Monkeyzpop (talk) 21:15, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Back today as 172.209.8.246 Monkeyzpop (talk) 20:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2007 New puppet

message: HaroldHakindson is his new one, as of today. Monkeyzpop (talk) 03:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And a glance at his contributions page suggests that he's now using popups to revert anything and everything submitted by one of his presumed "enemies".  This could get nasty. Monkeyzpop (talk) 04:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2008 Another new puppet

message: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HarveyCarter -- PBS (talk) 13:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2014
Talk:Interpretation Act 1978

message: A external link had been made to the act using wiki code. However, I think that it would be better if the link showed the sections of the act as opposed to the 'body' of the act. I do not know how to do this using wiki code. If anyone can do this if, you agree, I would be grateful if you could do so and maybe explain how to create wiki code for doing so. The link I have in mind is  Interpretation Act 1978 Ron Barker (talk) 08:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lake Orion High School

message: Per a request, I have made a more thorough evaluation of this article and I have the following suggestions to make:
#Ideally, you should use as many external references (Those not controlled or associated with the school) as possible. The larger the publication, the better.
#Every factual statement about the school needs to be verifiable, and for contentious facts like "suitable for state-level competitions" or "The first building to house Lake Orion students was built in 1893" there need to be direct citations inline (See WP:CITE).
#You need references in order to claim alumni as having gone to the school and to prove their notability.
#Remove wikilinks to common english words and numbers such as: library, computer, 1927, Fall, grass, etc...
#Replace weasle phrases like "one of the finest", and "commonly referred to". Whenever possible state facts, don't preface or overemphasize.
#The whole piece needs to be formalized (including the removal of parenthetical asides) per WP:TONE.
#The activities section needs to be reworked so that it is more uniform and does not emphasize any single specific aspect of the school. All of the clubs should have writeups or none of them should. Otherwise it shows WP:POV.
Hope that helps, Let me know if you need more help or information. Adam McCormick (talk) 01:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment Advice

message: All claims to  academic and athletic achievement  must  be sourced otherwise they  risk being  deleted as purely  unverifiable promotional  bloat. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced claims
Talk:Eddie Nash

message: Soul'd Out was not on West Hollywood, it was on Sunset and Wilcox in Hollywood, in the same space that had earlier housed the Red Velvet and later housed Club Lingerie. When Arthur Lee played Club Lingerie in 1989 he referred to it as Soul'd Out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.208.216 (talk) 04:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have been checking with people who worked at Odyssey 1 Disco - they say it was NOT one of the clubs Eddie Nash owned, Starwood was.  Second, Odyssey 1 was at San Vicente and Beverly, this is NOT in the City of Beverly Hills, but the City of Los Angeles.  I was a patron of that establishment for many years and there was an up front owner named Scott Harvey who had two partners, one named Chris Cox and the other whose first name was Bud (Bud was Scott's brother - Bud Harvey).
L. Greg (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Odyssey Disco Not Owned by Nash

message: It is a jumbled "dog's breakfast," with poor organization and a disjointed narrative. Are the sources so feeble that so little can be found out about this individual, other than details of criminal cases? If anyone wants to venture into this bio of a living person and put together a solid article, please do so.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  As this Talk page suggests, the article really needs some help 
Talk:Love Love?

message: This article (and it's related articles) are in need of serious expansion and cleanup. I've rewritten the main article to fix spelling and grammar and made an attempt at making the prose easier to understand although it's a bit challenging since I'm not (yet) familiar with the series. I'll try and expand on this article later. Vadigor (talk) 21:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Yips

message: The result was Redirect to List of How I Met Your Mother episodes.  Useful content is already present in that article.  As an aside, I do understand the desire to bring it to AfD to develop consensus rather than boldly merging - in the future perhaps a straw poll on the article talk page would be sufficient? Pastordavid (talk) 21:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a discussion (not necessarily a poll) on the article's talk page would be more than sufficient.  The only difference between that and AfD is that deletion can only be undone by sysops.  Using deletion to force people to follow consensus (instead of trusting the community to function well) is inappropriate.  —David Levy 21:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Closure
Talk:Recruitment process

message: I have introduced this article to be used as an overview of the recruitment process. This will be useful to students of Business Studies since it will guide them to all the different elements of the recruitment process.
It is not an advert, nor just a list of links, but a useful summary/overview. I hope that it stays since I can't see any reason why it is not allowed.
Gec118 (talk) 21:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cover it at Recruitment, which is specifically about 'the process'.  Simply add reliable sources to the list and please don't add spam links. Thanks. Kuru talk 02:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Michael Slater (general)

message: He doesn't hold this position now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.109.199.126 (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, updated now. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hudson Valley

message: I have nominated Walden–Wallkill Rail Trail for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 01:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walden–Wallkill Rail Trail at FAR
Talk:Bookland

message: This article should be renamed Bookland (barcode). It's about a barcode, not an imaginary place. It may use a fictitious location code, but it's about a barcode.--RLent (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Imaginary Place?

message: OK,
I'm pretty annoyed by everyone here.  Can we please discuss the merger rather than just edit war over it?  An article which was just kept at AfD really shouldn't be merged without some form of discussion.  We take it as granted that this article meets notability requirements--thus the keep.  Let's move forward and see why this should be merged.  I certainly believe that as it stands the merge target has way too much on this topic in proportion to its importance to the topic.  A sentence or 3 would be plenty.  I also don't see the reason to merge this. It is, in my opinion, an interesting topic that certainly has plenty of coverage and real-world relevance.  So, why merge? Hobit (talk) 00:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Katharina Henot

message: Jmenuji se Věra Vaňková rozená Neudenová z ČR  a hledám možné příbuzné jménem Neuden. Moje e-mailová adresa je vera.vak@seznam.cz  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.188.146.250 (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kessler (TV series)

message: Which actors played in both The Secret Army and 'Allo 'Allo?  Both pages refer to this but I don't see any overlap?
IceDragon64 (talk) 21:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Actors? 

message: When the airplane with Mengele and Bormann flies away in episode 5 one sees the face of Bormann, if not very clearly, behind a glass-window.  Judging from old photos of Bormann he might have looked something like this in his 80´s. His appearance in this series might be called "contrafactic history".— Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.77.211.233 (talk) 10:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bormanns face is showed
Talk:1936 Vuelta a España

message: The flags for the Spanish riders are wrong - surely they should be flags of the second republic? 217.35.132.93 (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: (and the pre-1946 Italian flag) SeveroTC 06:53, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags are wrong
Talk:GS1

message: Someone took out my photo and moved it to the GS1 US article.  Actually, GS1 US is also a GS1 Global Office along with the Belgium office so it is correct to have the photo of the U.S. office in this article.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 03:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The GS1 headquarters photo may be moved a bit down as it hides some text. Aashrith (talk) 08:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Looks fine to me (and I've looked at this article recently on two different computers with different screen sizes).  --Coolcaesar (talk) 09:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm viewing on another system and the large photo of the headquarters is obscuring some text.  Thanks Chris  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.42.184.99 (talk) 14:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What happened to my photo?

message: What does GS1 stand for? Global System? General Supply?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.246.132.178 (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Acronym

message: "The Barcode is the most well-known of the GS1 standards." This implies that all barcodes (which have diverse formats) are defined by a single GS1 standard. I find that dubious. When I check into a hospital and they give me a bracelet with a barcode, is that somehow specified by the GS1?  I don't have access to the referenced source, but I suspect that this should say that GS1 manages several (obviously not all) barcode standards. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 02:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is a quibble over semantics. Why not change it to "Barcodes are the most well-known of the GS1 standards." ? Chrisj1948 (talk) 11:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, for one thing "barcodes are standards" is simply not true. A semantic argument is not necessarily a quibble. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 20:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sigh. "Barcodes are the most well-known application of GS1 standards." ? Chrisj1948 (talk) 10:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barcode Standard 

message: there are many barcode systems on the market. which ones have been, first? I mean, 1D barcode is found everywhere. 2d are common. hasn't that been SAP? Wikistallion (talk) 09:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  is that SAP?
Talk:Expert systems for mortgages

message: I think this article will be very interesting for those who are going to work in banking area or just want to take to possess credit using mortgage loan. I've wrote an introduction to the article, used information from reliable sources and expended the article with new part "Goals and Objectives". What do you think about removing the notability tag? Prokopenya Viktor (talk) 22:15, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled