lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Service release premium

message: The following comments were originally posted in the article by an editor at 74.87.25.96; moved from the article to the talk page by Davnor (talk) 22:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed 

message: I have read the definition of service release premium on many internet sites and they all agree with the definition included in Wikipedia.  However, this definition is totally wrong.  The definition of a service release premium is the price a loan servicer is willing to pay for the discounted value of the future cash flows from the servicing fees the servicer will receive during the expected life of the mortgage loan being serviced.  When a lender sells a mortgage to a servicer, the servicer will pay this price to the lender because the servicer will receive future income flows from the servicing fee they charge the investors.  These fees and the price the servicer pays for this future income is not influenced at all by the fluctuations in the market rate of interest on the loans.  The servicing release premium may be the same for two mortgages with the same characteristics, but originated at totally different interest rates.  This premium (SRP) will be the same whether or not the lender offered the borrower a low rate of interest or a high rate of interest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cs170a (talk • contribs) 17:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indented line This is not true. MSR is calculated based on the principal, since the principal left changes with the interest rate it does change with loans terms and resembles an interest only strip. 207.159.80.180 (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

text: MSR? Do you even know what is being discussed here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.94.52 (talk) 20:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree with Disputed 

message: It is not the case that SRP is not influenced by interest rates. Consider a simple example: a 30-year fixed mortgage originated at 6.5% has a certain servining value if the interest rate is around 6.5%, but a significantly LOWER value if the interest rate is below 5.75% or so. Why lower? Because the risk of early payoff significantly increases as the difference between the current interest rate on a loan and prevailing rates increase (when the prevailing interest rate is lower than the current interest rate). Put simply, when a borrower's interest rate is higher than the prevailing interest rate, borrowers refinance their mortgages. That refinance ends the income stream from servicing on the original loan. Also, SRP does vary based upon the term of the loan and on the type of mortgage loan. SRP is really nothing more than the discounted present value of the servicing revenue over time. Loan term, interest rate, and loan type will dramatically affect SRP values. It is most certainly not a fixed value.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.53.40.80 (talk) 03:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Exactly
Talk:Santa Clara Valley Water District

message: This article's "Coyote Dam" links to the wrong Coyote Dam!  How to fix? Paulburnett (talk) 21:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coyote Dam in Santa Clara County versus Coyote Dam in Mendocino County? 

message: I am an employee of Valley Water and will not directly edit this article in compliance with Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest Policy.
The listing of the Chair is significantly out of date, and likely to become out of date again annually. Recommend replacing the name of the Chair with a link to the Board page. Interested readers can go check who the Chair is currently at https://www.valleywater.org/how-we-operate/board-directors 
Additional information concerning Valley Water Projects and other activities are also available at  https://www.valleywater.org/
Lists of Valley Water creeks, water bodies, dams and the like are available at  https://data-valleywater.opendata.arcgis.com/
765mgr (talk) 01-03-2022
:Hi , per Wikipedia:External links (Wikipedia's guidelines on External Links), they should not typically be placed in the body of the article, but could potentially be used as citations in the article. At present, the External links section already links to the second link you provided. Although the information on the chair may change annually, this can be easily updated on Wikipedia. Similarly, we consistently post updates to the positions of elected officials, whose positions also change frequently, without issues. SpencerT•C 00:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated using source A provided. SpencerT•C 00:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update Chair
Talk:Settling basin

message: I think the following should be clarified:
"Stokes' law can be used to calculate the size of a settling basin needed in order to remove a desired particle size."
As far as I know, Stokes' law allows to predict the velocity of a particle (given its size and shape) falling through a viscous medium. This would lead to an estimate of the time needed for setting if the size of the basin is known, or vice-versa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.248.174.103 (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stokes law and basin size 

message: The term appears several times on WP and it is not rerouted here. Thanks.Arminden (talk) 20:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Please link "sedimentation pond" search word to this page
Talk:Standpipe (street)

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Environment on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with this assessment, please:
# Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
#Remove the stub template from the article.
Req for photo removed as there is one at this date and it looks fine to me. 26 Sept 2011, Here.it.comes.again (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Veolia Water Central

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Environment on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with this assessment, please:
# Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
#Remove the stub template from the article.
It supplies Bucks too, e.g. Chesham.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 14:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Treadle pump

message: Before you add a major idea to the page or dramatically change the layout please share your ideas before you do so! Also see what people have to say about what you are going to do. Please do this to ensure other people's hard work doesn't go to waste.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brprochazka (talk • contribs) 17:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas to add to page 

message: I also think adding pictures of treadle pumps and things related to treadle pumps would be effective in greatly improving the article. Please if you have any other ideas share them!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brprochazka (talk • contribs) 16:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

message: There are more resources available here (http://www.preservehyattsville.org/wsscthenandnow.htm) and here (http://www.wssc.dst.md.us/about/history.cfm) to expand this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eli.pousson (talk • contribs) 03:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Resources

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.wsscwater.com/home/jsp/content/wssc-history.faces. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   ascidian | talk-to-me 19:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Best management practice for water pollution

message: I have expanded this article by adding sections on use of the term "BMP" in industrial wastewater permitting.  I think the use of the term in industrial wastewater may precede its use in the burgeoning stormwater management field.  At a minimum, the Clean Water Act and EPA publications initially only referred to the industrial BMP context.  I have provided references that I could locate.
Additional background on the history of the term "BMP" in water pollution control is welcome. Perhaps it appears in some older (i.e. pre-Clean Water Act) wastewater engineering textbooks?  Anyone who can find references, please add them where appropriate.
Since there is not a current article on "Stormwater Management," this BMP article could be expanded to become the major reference on the topic.  There are several existing articles on individual BMP types, such as retention basin, but we need an article providing an overview of the entire field.  The existing article on stormwater does not address the management topic, and should probably be left as such. Comments? Moreau1 (talk) 01:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Agar malwa

message: Also Baijnath temple is the only temple built by a britisher.martin luther ,during his war day.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.19.18.7 (talk) 13:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: Hi! I propose that this page be merged with Agar (India), since both seem to indicate information about the same place. Kumar Appaiah (talk) 02:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Biotreatment

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20071011063816/http://www.horizonpress.com/hsp/books/biod.html (cited in first version), and subsequently from Anna-Irini Koukkou, Microbial Bioremediation of Non-metals: Current Research, page 253. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Clinker (waste)

message: Text and Reference copied from Clinker (waste) to Cement clinker.  See history of former article for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: Both images in this article are described as cement clinker, which is distinct from the waste clinker that this article is about. Other articles like about clinker blocks describe it as more of an ash; I hope others can add more relevant images to replace the current ones. Cviu (talk) 15:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect images
Talk:Coal slurry impoundment

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Environment on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with this assessment, please:
# Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
#Remove the stub template from the article.
Wait, what is the difference in fly ash slurry v. coal slurry v. Blackwater (coal) ? rkmlai (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

message: Aren't substances such as lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, etc. also found in coal slurry? None of those seem to be mentioned in this article, although many organic compounds are. Badagnani (talk) 00:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition
Talk:Dunnage

message: : when i worked at a menard's DC we used slightly dmged plywoods/foam panels/paneling and such to protect bundles of product (picks we called them) and were required to spray paint the word dunnage on them so customers couldnt try returning the product as dmged for a refund or an exange.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.33.195.158 (talk) 22:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menards DC
Talk:Mobile incinerator

message: This article as it stood was substantially a duplicate of the Incineration article, was entirely devoid of citations, and actually had less about mobile incinerators than has the main article. For these reasons and WP:FORK, I have changed it to a redirect to Incinerator#Mobile incinerators. Obviously if anyone feels strongly that this bold edit is not correct, we can go to the formal WP:articles for deletion process (which, I have no doubt, will come to the same conclusion). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forked article changed to redirect
Talk:Pink water

message: I completely rewrote this article, because much of it was incorrect or misleading. In particular:
# It's 'pink water", not "pinkwater";
# Pink water is not from manufacture, but from cleaning processes. The stuff produced in manufacturing is called "red water" and is quite different;
# It does necessarily contain RDX, except accidentally, and has nothing whatever to do with RDX manufacture.
-- Securiger (talk) 09:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Tosher

message: Re: Tosheroon can also apply to the conglomeration of items caught up in mud and debris, that form a ball shaped entity in the sewers and can sometimes grown quite large. At times, treasures may be found within but sometimes just detritus. A tosher thought himself lucky if he found a tosheroon as it may contain a substantial reward.
Is this a legitimate meaning outside of Terry Pratchett's "Discworld" series? -- Resuna (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tosheroon (meaning 2) 

message: The topic of this article is the scavenger type. Other meanings should be placed in other articles, or on Wiktionary. Wikipedia is not a dictionary.
-- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 15:42, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Excised "other meanings"

message: Steven Johnson's The Ghost Map, a book about the cholera plague in London in the mid-19th century, begins with a description of that city's toshers.  Is this worth mentioning? Kdammers (talk) 08:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention
Talk:Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure

message: The article (18 November 2009) expresses the idea that "organic matter is rarely buried with other waste anymore (composting usually applies)." Although this may be true in specific instances, there is still a large amount of readily degradable organic matter, e.g. food wastes, disposable diaper wastes, and similar matter, in most municipal solid waste landfills in the United States. Please discuss and reference. KudzuVine (talk) 23:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Organic Matter

message: Organic matter is *frequently* still buried in landfills in Canada, and I say the statement about this so-called controversy be removed entirely.  Municipal composting programs are not so-wide spread, nor are there participation rates 100% (especially since they are in large part directed at residential sectors, and do not include ICI, or industrial, commercial and institutional, sectors) so as to effectively preclude leachate formation from happening in landfills. 131.104.209.60 (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Organic matter still in landfills
Talk:Rob Lord (musician)

message: The biog on the Blaze Music site is just the non copyrighted biography for Rob Lord that can be found on numerous websites such as www.stylophonic.tv
:That's the person's website. He maybe allowed to copy the biography for the site I put up but not for Wikipedia. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ty zh mene pidmanula

message: Is the song titled as "Ти ж мене підманула", or "підманула пiдвела"? Ostap (talk) 01:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The first.--Riurik(discuss) 04:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats what I thought.  Should it be moved? Ostap (talk) 04:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's up to you.  I don't think there would be anyone to object.  For accuracy's sake, it should be moved, and this page can be left for a redirect.--Riurik(discuss) 22:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps Mr. Mandzyuk had a reason for the current title.  I think we should wait for him to comment.  I don't think anyone will mind waiting :) Ostap (talk) 23:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just titled the song from my previous knowledge of the song. However, I have nothing against moving it to the other name. :) --Boguslav (talk) 00:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the version I put in look good?  I know there are more than one.  If you have any corrections to make it the most popular, please make them. Ostap (talk) 00:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Svetlana Alpers

message: As now noted in the article Alpers has written several major books on the subject of Art History.Johnpacklambert (talk) 03:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Most of the content of this entry appears to be taken from: http://www.collegeart.org/features/alpers
Lippard (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unoriginal content
Talk:Newmusicbox

message: I recreated this page after it was "speedily deleted" for lack of notability.  I feel this was done hastily and with predjudice.  The NewMusicBox is already referenced many times in Wikipedia and I feel that this stub will grow in time if given the chance and will be a valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Please forgive me if I went about this the wrong way.  I am still a new wikipedian. VoxNovus (talk) 02:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Amanganj

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:2008 Superbike World Championship

message: Matt Lynn needs moving into the main grid of results, as he in fact entered more than one round (without scoring a point). Also, the title 'Other wildcard riders' might need changing, as Martin Bauer was a replacement (for Kiyonari) rather than a wildcard per se.--MartinUK (talk) 17:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Remarks

message: Like in British Superbikes, isn't it good to have a table with Superpole, Fastest Lap etc all in one? 115.132.73.182 (talk) 15:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in the Calendar table. Poles and fastest laps have nothing to do with the schedule of events. Tables need to reflect their accompanying text and not be used as a dumping ground for non relevant information. If this information is in a British Superbike Calendar, it should be removed. --Falcadore (talk) 15:25, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Pole position yields zero points, as fastest laps do. And the team name is pretty useless too. They are not pertinent information. We have lots of race report articles, where that information belong, to do. Do not concentrate on purely cosmetic edits. Asendoh (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I understand ur reasons in MotoGP... it is not good to have 3 large tables but here there will only be 1 table. 118.101.5.219 (talk) 10:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Look here for comprehensive discussion. Asendoh (talk) 11:22, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Table
Talk:1988 Superbike World Championship

message: I was just wondering, given points were awarded based on the combined result for Donington only, should this be included in the points table as a separate column for easier reading, and if so, should the race results have the colours changed to make it clearer they didn't also contribute points?
Jq-22 (talk) 14:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donington in points table
Talk:Amarpatan

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: District changed to Maihar for Amarpatan town in Madhya Pradesh 103.215.237.231 (talk) 17:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  District change
Talk:Amarwara

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Ambada

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: The one source, the census, does not include as Ambada (or Morshi) with a population of 48,000. Please clarify. PamD 18:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed