Talk:Politics of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

message: Dear MUNer, I've removed your comment on the main page. What delegation are you? Assuming you are on the security council for Belfast, I will see you tomorrow!195.195.166.31 14:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the line since i couldn't find a fact to support this line  and i think the article can exist perfectly without it Diedtc (talk) 15:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

text: (...) the Taliban, which lost recognition from all other countries in the world except Pakistan after the September 11 terrorist attacks against the United States. As of October 2001, only Pakistan recognized the Taliban government, though Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates had in the past.
If only three countries of the world had recognized Afghanistan's Taliban government, then it's a contradiction to state that it lost recognition from "all other countries in the world". Further, the recognition of a government is linked to the government's control over a state, and recognition is not "revoked" unless the government loses the control. In other words, one would expect that the war against Afghanistan was the cause of the government's loss of recognition, not a terrorist attack against the United States. -- Johan Magnus 00:52 19 May 2003 (UTC)
----
There is no need to analyze every link we put in. I think we should removed the lengthy descriptions. --Jiang 00:20, 7 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled comments 

message: I put two  tags in there, both in the Elections and Legislative sections, because both mention the April 2005 elections from an advance perpective.   (Very nice article, though!)   PhilipR 19:02, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, it's extremely out of date. In 2002 it might have been a good page. Anyway, I'm going to try and write something up about the legislative election. --RaiderAspect 00:56, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed: April 2005 parliamentary elections 

message: The article says that "With the exception of military junta..." Afghanistan has had every kind of political system, and then proceeds to list them. However, some of the examples given include capitalism and socialism. These are not political systems, rather economic systems, and besides that they are vaguely defined. Does "socialism" here mean command economy? Mixed market? Administrative welfare state? Does "capitalism" mean laissez-faire? Keynesian?
My point here is that the terminology here is not really specific and doesn't add to an understanding of Afghan politics. On the other hand specific terms like "pro-soviet communist state" are useful because it refers to the specific phenomenon of an authoritarian state controlled by a national Communist Party loyal to the USSR during the Cold War. Just my 2 cents. 88.11.125.125 (talk) 15:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed.--Anthonzi (talk) 10:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 

message: The government section of the "Outline of Afghanistan" needs to be checked, corrected, and completed -- especially the subsections for the government branches.
When the country outlines were created, temporary data (that matched most of the countries but not all) was used to speed up the process.  Those countries for which the temporary data does not match must be replaced with the correct information.
Please check that this country's outline is not in error.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact The Transhumanist .
Thank you. kaleb cerar is awesome wich is (me)
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.56.115.219 (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important notice 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) Muhibm0307 (talk) 04:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Politics of Afghanistan →  – The content about the Karzia-Ghani regime needs to be split from the high-level article about Politics of Afghanistan.  Most of the edit history is relevant to that content so the history should be moved as well. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 August 2021 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. CMD's draft can go in place of the old article.   — Amakuru (talk) 10:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Politics of Afghanistan →  – The content about the Karzia-Ghani regime needs to be split from the high-level article about Politics of Afghanistan.  Most of the edit history is relevant to that content so the history should be moved as well. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 16:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I believe that is what the proposal is, namely two articles, with the common name going to the current situation and the other one being historical. --Bejnar (talk) 02:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 August 2021