lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aragorn

message: Towards the bottom: "Viggo Mortensen gave an outstanding[15] performance as Aragorn in Peter Jackson's The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King". Doesn't this violate Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:199:87F:EB10:6155:79F2:6FFA:3752 (talk) 00:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, as the adjective was cited directly. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorializing 

message: I have made a series of edits to the lead section, the background section, and the fictional biography. I have removed some excess detail and added some missing information that I hope will help make these sections clearer to readers who are not conversant with the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Many people and places were mentioned in these sections, and it was not always made clear who or what they were and what their significance was. EugeneMJ (talk) 11:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've tweaked these slightly as the article is in British English. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: This is overall a high-quality article. But I find some of the clickable-internal LINKS to be less than explicable. One outstanding example: Shouldn't the internal clickable Link "underneath" (as in hidden til mouseover on my rig) the words "ring of Barahir" actually link to a page or at least a section about the Ring of Barahir (It's a ring. Finrod Felagund, Elven King in the First Age and Friend of Man -- this is from the Silmarillion --  gave this ring to Beren Onehanded's father Barahir in a "first contact" situation, if you will, and it has passed over maybe seven thousand years to Aragorn.)  Instead, the blue "ring of Barahir" link links to a long, possibly obscure wiki page about the Noldorin Elves in general. I don't know if it even ever gets around to telling of Finrod's giving of this ring, although he IS a Noldorin Elf, so it's not really "misfiled," it's just very badly, loosely, unproductively filed. Anyone? After I post this, I will look around for "Ring of Barahir" on Wikipedia, so I cann better suggest solutions. 
<{: )}> 2601:643:8C83:84C0:1955:33EF:86ED:D058 (talk) 15:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added detail over at Noldor, so the redirect serves a little better. A lot of fan-level detail was deleted a few years ago; the surviving articles have much more in the way of encyclopedic content and citations to establish notability, which is certainly an improvement. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some strange links?
Talk:Jakarta Project

message: This is a message I removed from the article. It comes from IP User:61.17.200.212
: Please rewrite this. The tone is not right. This is probably not politically correct. The Jakarta conference room at Sun Microsystems was named after the capital city of Indonesia.
: Put yourself in the shoes of readers from Indonesia - why belittle them? It just reeks of American arrogance. Then Americans wonder why they aint liked no more outside USA.
: How would you like it something like this is written in Encyclopedias of the world?
: The new 5G Wi-Max technology called Dallas is not named after the city in USA. It is named after Mr Narayan Murthy's favorite dog - who inspired him to fund the new startup company in Bangalore?
 
: I suppose the editorial team should not be so insensitive.
Please don't shoot the messenger. I'm just cuttin' and pastin' here... -Bouchecl 01:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message from IP 61.17.200.212 

message: "Jakarta is named after the conference room at Sun Microsystems" but then immediately afterwards "At the time, Sun's Java software division was headquartered in a Cupertino building". So which one is right? Jakarta or Cupertino? Terrabalt (talk) 05:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project name
Talk:Bopomofo

message: Please would an interested editor assess the material added at the abandoned user draft User:Garygo golob/Bopomofo/sandbox (Evolution of the letters), and if it is useful then find citations and add it to the live article? Please leave a note here when done. – Fayenatic London 11:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft 

message: @Fish bowl, I believe "bopomofo" is generally uncapitalized, such as the case with the analogous terms "alphabet", "abjad", and "abugida". Remsense留 06:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ok; the article predominantly uses capitalization, which I am not decisively responsible for; not sure why you pinged me specifically? Fish bowl (talk) 03:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I just see you are a frequent recent editor of this article. How do I hallucinate these things? Apologies again. I suppose it was a good idea in the process of polling for consensus anyhow. Apologies. Remsense留 06:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Words like alphabet and abjad are analogous only in the sense of being similarly built etymologically. In English, they are common nouns denoting types of writing systems rather than referring specifically to the Phoenician and the Arabic ones. Conversely, Bopomofo is used in English as a proper name for this specific writing system described in this article so it should be more natural to capitalize it. But it seems to be written either way in practice. It's similar to the situation with Pinyin/pinyin. – MwGamera (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose one concern is it reads unnaturally in context, especially alongside an uncapitalized "pinyin". Remsense留 21:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Human rights in the United States

message: There have been a series of edits recently in the History section, beginning with this one on 22 December and culminating with one I just made. The edits probably deserve to be gone through in sequence, but their overall effect after that most recent one amounts to this. I think the current version is an improvement which addresses POV concerns behind the individual edits in the series. In the spirit of WP:BRD, I suggest that further improvements be discussed here rather than in an exchange of edit summaries. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits to the History section 

message: * Is the article from a neutral point of view?
The article seems to mostly have a neutral point of view, using both liberal and conservative voices to measure the US' marks on human rights and potential violations. However, some sections may have a liberal bias. For example, the section on “coverage of violations in the media” seems to be biased; it only includes a critique of the New York Times coverage of human rights abuses, claiming it to be biased, but does not include opposing viewpoints or any more explanation of coverage violations in the media. The liberal viewpoint seems to be overrepresented in some sections, such as the section on Guantánamo Bay, which includes several liberal viewpoints and only one statement from a Republican senator.SarahD12345678910 (talk) 01:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Without looking at the details of this case, I'll comment that the focus here ought to be on dueness of weight rather than on neutrality as perceived by individual editors. Please don't take this as an argument against your points, I just want to point that up here. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the article from a neutral point of view? 

message: Project
Campaign
Event 41.114.141.88 (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project which address discrimination and human rights violation 

message: Another editor continues to remove information, noted in this diff, which is cited information, because they think it's cherry picked. I don't want to revert again should they continue to remove, but thought it would be useful to start a discussion here. Can anyone take a look and see if this warrants being removed? To me, it looks relevant, but other opinions would be helpful. Thanks! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 16:46, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information being removed
Talk:Paris Commune

message: There is no dispute in the "Academic Dispute" section, since all of the academics cited advocate variations of the Marxist point of view, and are wholly favourable to the Commune and against Thiers and the French government. The section needs to be re-written to meet Wikipedia neutrality standards, or simply deleted. SiefkinDR (talk) 12:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite or delete the "Academic Dispute" section
Talk:Silas

message: I do see some ramblings here, but Silas was an important figure for the formation of the Christian Church (people).  However, the "controversy" over Silas's name being penned as Silvanus is merely the fact that the epistles are written in Hellenistic form which Silas is a contracted form of Silvanus, not a nickname.  (King James Version/Study Bible) JediRRT  —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be kept, although I'm not sure if much can be said about the Biblical Silas: he appears only a few times in the Bible. Concerning "Silas the footballer", I assume he has a last name, & once it is learned perhaps his information should be moved to that article. -- llywrch 19:38, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I actually found this quite useful... seeming as how i've been called silas for some time now and never knew who he actally was.
What is the right pronounciation of this name??
is it Seelas or Sailas????
Pronounced Cy-lus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.207.67.126 (talk) 19:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: Should Silvanus of the Seventy be merged here?--Andrew c 22:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Is the picture in this article a joke? It appears to say: "Believe or the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved". I don't speak or read Russian, but even using Google Translate the source of this picture does not seem very trustworthy... Bertrand77 (talk) 07:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's definitely "Believe on..." StAnselm (talk) 08:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: If you want to WP:CITE her, then cite her under a section entitled Mysticism. But definitely not in a section about the Bible and definitely not in a section dealing with real-world history. Emmerich-Brentano did not write WP:SCHOLARSHIP, they wrote mysticism. As historiography and Bible scholarship it's just garbage. To put it otherwise, her writings are WP:RS for her own views only (and even that much has been challenged), but not for objective historical facts about the ancient history. tgeorgescu (talk)  00:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anne Catherine Emmerich
Talk:Jiang Zemin

message: Why is there no infobox for this article? Nswix (talk) 22:12, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: wait there is. it just doesn't show in the mobile app. strange. Nswix (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: '''
 On 20 May 1997 Russian President Boris Yeltsin and Chinese leader Jiang Zemin signed a declaration on a "multipolar world".'''
(wikipedia entry  Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) 2001:8003:A070:7F00:E49D:28AB:85EB:DE13 (talk) 03:29, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of the inventors of the multi-polar world?  

message: Please someone with skills connect these? Thanks 98.125.251.16 (talk) 08:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are plenty of wikilinks on his name in the article, but not all instances are linked per MOS:REPEATLINK.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 09:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there no link to Hu Jintao? 

message: :On 19 September 2004, after the 4th Plenary Session of the 16th Central Committee, Jiang, at the age of 78, relinquished his post as chairman of the party's Central Military Commission, his last post in the party. Six months later in March 2005, Jiang resigned his last significant post, chairman of the Central Military Commission of the state, which marked the end of Jiang's political career
I don't get it. Did he announce his resignation in September, and only actually resign in March? DFlhb (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: party's Central Military Commission != state's Central Military Commission. See: Central Military Commission (China)#Members 58.176.72.209 (talk) 14:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, thanks. DFlhb (talk) 14:20, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear 

message: — Assignment last updated by SlyRedeemerJT (talk) 16:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Socialism
Talk:Richard Strauss

message: I hadn't looked at this article for quite some time and am delighted and impressed how much it has been improved since I last saw it. I had it on my to-do list but have now removed it as no longer needing upgrading, IMO. Has/have the main author(s) considered putting it up for peer review with a view to taking it to GAN or FAC? I think it deserves it. Tim riley talk 20:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  any plans? Aza24 (talk) 06:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:   and  I hadn’t considered it, but I might based on this suggestion. Thanks for noticing my work.4meter4 (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much improved article
Talk:List of fictional dogs

message: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional badgers.  If that one goes, all of these will be up for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the list of badgers has survived deletion after a bit of cleanup and RS sourcing, but for those looking for advice on how to clean up and RS source this list, please refer to Talk:List of fictional dogs/Archive 1#Request for Comment as that discussion represents the current consensus for this topic. -Thibbs (talk) 17:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Durham, England

message: Durham will be a civil parish called "City of Durham" from 1 April 2018. I'll wait until it comes through Mapit before adding it. Unparished area and the Commons category will need to be updated when this happens. Crouch, Swale (talk)  19:02, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I see this is already mentioned, I will add the rest when Mapit shows it. Crouch, Swale (talk)  19:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Crouch, Swale (talk)  16:56, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil parish 

message: Not sure if the total rainfall of the year is correct: 1445.7 rather than 1445.4 in the table.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.189.169 (talk) 09:06, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate 

message: in pop culture:  Roger Whittaker's "leavin'" is about Durham. 2600:6C67:1C00:300:751F:948D:1250:612E (talk) 23:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  pop culture 

message: I would have thought with local northern England English it would be pronounced . I would say if so it should be like Newcastle upon Tyne’s, RP (the current ) and local way of pronouncing the city’s name. Chocolateediter (talk) 21:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: So 
*locally , 
*general northern England English  
*  in general southern England. Chocolateediter (talk) 13:27, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How it’s pronounced
Talk:2002 in music

message: Leo1pard (talk) 11:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: The name 'Shaam' () would originally refer to the Syrian region,Article "AL-SHĀM" by C.E. Bosworth, Encyclopaedia of Islam, Volume 9 (1997), page 261. so the actor's page was renamed to Shaam (actor). Leo1pard (talk) 11:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of Shaam
Talk:Tidal force

message: This isn't true of the Great Lakes. Are there others it isn't true of? We should probably find a source saying which lakes it is and isn't true of. פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her (talk) 23:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  " Tidal action on bath tubs, swimming pools, lakes, and other small bodies of water is negligible"
Talk:Frederick III, German Emperor

message: This is frankly horrible. It seems to be a hodge-podge of copy-paste stuff. Can't somebody do a reasonable summary of the article? There is more than enough substantial material in it.  Drow69 (talk) 13:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section 

message: OK, the article clearly states that his name is "Friedrich". So...why is the article titled "Frederick"? All the other names are messed up as well. He never had a son named "William". Also, his father was not "William". What is going on here? Cultural genocide much? 68.45.174.58 (talk) 04:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this is an annoying issue...especially since the principles are not always consistently applied. However, see here Talk:Wilhelm II, German Emperor for past discussions of this very point. Drow69 (talk) 11:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It was common practice in most countries to translate the names of royalty, but current practice in many places is to mostly keep the original language name. It is a bit unclear where the cut-off point between both conventions lies. We try to consistently apply WP:COMMONNAME, which makes us as inconsistent other published material :) —Kusma (t·c) 12:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: This section is at least three times as long as it should be and simultaneously contains completely unimportant info while not mentioning some of the most important things, e.g. that Mackenzie stuck to his wrong diagnosis even after it was obvious that it was wrong and that Gerhardt came to the conclusion that Mackenzie took a biopsy of the wrong vocal chord, the one on the right (Gerlach/Keil (1988), p. 278 f. -- Joachim Gerlach und Gundolf Keil: Der Kehlkopfkrebs Kaiser Friedrichs III. In: Würzburger medizinhistorische Mitteilungen 6, 1988). 
Even Morell Mackenzie is more honest: 
In November, however, the German doctors were again called into consultation, and it was ultimately admitted that the disease really was cancer; but Mackenzie, with very questionable judgment, more than hinted that it had become malignant since his first examination, in consequence of the irritating effect of the treatment by the German doctors. The crown prince became emperor on 9 March 1888 and died on 15 June. During all this period, a violent quarrel raged between Mackenzie and the German medical world. The German doctors published an account of the illness, to which Mackenzie replied by a work entitled The Fatal Illness of Frederick the Noble (1888), the publication of which caused him to be censured by the Royal College of Surgeons. 
--Espoo (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  illness and diagnoses and treatments
Talk:1999 in music

message: Boy this page just got a lot crappier :)
- Tubby
:: Sure did. I'm trying to find lists of "Hits" from the last few years.. I'm amazed by how few of them I even recognize. THe ones I do recognize are horrible and I actually feel embarrassed to add them to the page. -Jazz77
Although it sold very, very little at the time, in retrospect The White Stripes'
first album would be considered one of the great albums of '99, in terms of being a premonition for what was to come....admittedly Jack's songwriting was not yet what it would become... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.179.53.179 (talk • contribs).
There are 12 top selling albums in the "10" top selling albums section. I didn't wanted to delete the last two albums because maybe there are ties. Could someone solve this?
--Joanberenguer 14:11, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm going to add "Take a Picture" to the Top Singles section. Korn's "Falling Away from Me" and "Freak on a Leash" are listed amongst the Top Singles, yet "Take a Picture" isn't, even though it charted far higher than those two KoRn songs on the Billboard Hot 100, and it also charted higher than them on both the Modern and Mainstream Rock charts. It also topped the Dance Club Play chart, and was a Top 5 hit in Canada. Duder5k (talk) 23:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Filter's "Take A Picture"
Talk:Night of the Living Dead

message: Draft:Night of the Living Dead remakes
After working on the article and nominating it for GA, I thought the list of remakes should be split into its own article. Except for the 1990 remake, sources on the original film don't discuss these specific remakes (WP:DUE). Sources on the original film do mention that the film is frequently remade. I think the current remake section should retain the information about 1990 film, note how often the film is remade, and link to an article focused on the remakes. As time goes on, the film will likely continue to see remakes, and they can be given more space in a list article. I'll hold off a few weeks on splitting to see if others have feedback. Rjjiii (talk) 00:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split the list of public domain remakes off into a "Remakes of ''Night of the Living Dead''" article 

message: This is the first time I've heard of a sourced vandalism. It's in the public notice on page 80 of this issue of Broadcasting Magazine, for those wondering where I got this information. --2600:6C5D:5B00:A84D:85D4:F4FC:E11E:842D (talk) 04:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of edit to copyright status section
Talk:Rochester, New York

message: This list seems inappropriate for this article and mostly redundant since half of the items on it are already mentioned elsewhere in the article. I think it should be removed, provided that some more information on the parks and museums is added to the Culture section. Kodak03 (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points of interest 

message: In demographics 2600:1008:B035:8D0E:585B:D04F:8A22:614B (talk) 02:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  100+%? 

message: The infobox says the lowest elevation is 230 ft (70 meters) when Lake Ontario is about 10 feet (3m) higher than that at 240 ft (73 meters). Where is this below lake level point? B137 (talk) 07:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the lowest elevation from infobox showing 10 ft below nominal Lake Onatrio surface?  

message: The section on neighborhoods needs improvement. The neighborhoods that are described in detail were chosen arbitrarily and the whole section lacks reliable sources. Several of the defined neighborhoods overlap with each other as well. Might be best to rewrite the detailed sections from scratch or remove them. Rocfan275 (talk) 16:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neighborhoods 

message: @Magnolia677 and @Bjengles3, I see there is a dispute over the city court. I am personally in favor of including some information about the city court on this page, since there are three branches of the city government and I see no reason to exclude one entirely. However, the section as originally written gives undue weight to the court and includes information which is not appropriate for this article. Per the US Cities Guideline, a full list of incumbent judges is inadvisable. The information about courts in the state of New York should also be trimmed and included on Judiciary of New York (state) instead. Rocfan275 (talk) 13:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for clarifying this. I agree now that readers would benefit from some information of due weight. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  City Court