Talk:Man Singh I

message: Raja Man Singh and his father Raja Bhagawan das were really great sons of
India they realised that India at the time of Akbar the great was feudal
state and Akbar was destined to unite her into a unified state.They joined
hands with Akbar who really ruled like a true imprtial king taking care 
of his subjects withoput any bias of religion.
There is some (unfounded as yet) talk that it was infact Raja Man Singh and not Shah Jahan who was resposible for the contruction of Taj Mahal.
The Tajmahal was no doubt constructed by Mughal Emperer Shahjahan.But the place of construction was formerly Haveli of Man Singh.Though this is also disputed.But generally it is accepted that Shahjahan acquired the land for construction of Taj and Raja of Amber was compensated with another land.
--Shivbramh 15:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With time the name Mansingh has got changed into Mansinghka or Mansingka.
I thought this particular article is about Raja Man Singh I of Amber, grandson of Bharmal? I have never heard about him being from Bhilwara or having his name changed to Mansingka, as his life story has been fairly well documented in Rajasthan.  For obvious reasons I have removed the sentence.
Devraj Singh 15:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mansingka?

message: Searching for "Man Singh" does not bring up this entry.  How can this be fixed?  66.68.173.84 03:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. If you go there you can see in the edit view how to make redirects. Cheers Thomas 12:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Search Terms

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: Why was the portrait showing him on horse removed? This is a unique image, and the only evidence I was able to find so far that there existed a kind of riding art in India, since the horse was shown performing a good, collected Levade. Hence, it is an image of considerable significance. Thyl Engelhardt 213.70.217.168 (talk) 06:34, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why removal of portrait on horse? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Man Singh I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061219135103/http://mewarindia.com/ency/man.html to http://www.mewarindia.com/ency/man.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello, 
I wish to ask about the source from where the name of the children were taken. I tried to search up for it, it does not seem like some of the children existed. Manavati (talk) 12:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children 

message: 2402:8100:2775:E5FD:FA18:9606:DDD2:9A16 (talk) 04:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . Capitals00 (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2023