lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gal Fridman

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 15:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:The Wizard of Oz

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move. Supporters' argument that the film is the primary topic for this article is based on salient facts, such as the unusually high number of view on the dab page and the film gets many times more view than the book, not to mention that this is the name of the film and not the title of the book. Opposers' argument that the film is not the primary topic is based solely on the opinion that having that many more views is still not enough. Finally, Supporters point out that the bottom line is the vast majority of users searching with "The Wizard of Oz" will be taken directly to the article they seek, rather than redirected to the dab page as they are now, and the minority will be just one (hatnote) click away, just like they are now when taken to the dab page where they are one (dab page) click away. So the move benefits the majority with no cost to the minority. (non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 06:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wizard of Oz (1939 film) →  – The film, The Wizard of Oz (1939 film), and the novel, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, are sufficient distinct from each other to fall under WP:SMALLDETAILS. The original novel was not published as The Wizard of Oz (according to the article, it has sometimes been reprinted with the film's title due to the film's popularity, meaning the publishers wanted to associate themselves with the film as a companion piece, which only proves that the film is more widely associated with that term) and is thus WP:NATURALly disambiguated; this is similar to The Fellowship of the Ring (the book) vs. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (the film), or The Shawshank Redemption (the film) vs. Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption (the book).
Perhaps a more excellent example would be Nineteen Eighty-Four, which is not titled 1984 (novel) despite often being reprinted and known as such. The book and the year are both equally and highly notable, but because of the differences in their names, they are disambiguated NATURALly. Due to The Wizard of Oz cultural impact and significance, being one of the most influential films of all time, comparable to that of Nineteen Eighty-Four, it can easily be regarded as the primary topic for the exact term "The Wizard of Oz", and this is reinforced by pageviews. A Google Search for "The Wizard of Oz" surfaces results almost exclusively for the film. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

text: 2601:441:8284:1CC0:A90D:3256:3521:8E08 (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 February 2024
Talk:Siege of Fort Ticonderoga (1777)

message: The name, 'the Battle of Ticonderoga' belongs to the assault on Fort Carillon, at Ticonderoga, New York, in 1758. What happened at Fort Ticonderoga in 1777 involved no actual fighting - therefore it was not a battle. To needlessly call it a 'battle' means that we are left with TWO Battles of Ticonderoga when there was really only one. Let us call what happened in 1777 the Loss of Fort Ticonderoga, the Abandonment of Fort Ticonderoga, the Withdrawal from Fort Ticonderoga or the Occupation of Fort Ticonderoga - anything but a battle. That way we avoid totally unnecessary confusion and make things clearer for everyone.
Flonto 09:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesn't. The Battle of Carillon refers to the assault on Fort Carillon. And this battle did involve an artillery bombardment and a British pursuit (Trip Johnson (talk) 19:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This was not a battle 

message: In the section titled "Winter Fortifications", it is stated that General St. Clair had 2,500 men; however, the infobox states that he had 3,500. Which is correct? Nerdygeek101 (talk) 21:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strength of St. Clair
Talk:Watusi (dance)

message: Previous page looked like an experiment. Here's an honest stub. Removed speedy deletion message. Will add stub.
Who are you? And what is Revolution 9? Why no mention of the Land of a Thousand Dances or Sam Cooke's Twistin' the Night Away? LockeShocke 13:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As far as I can tell this article contains no information about the dance itself—i.e., if someone is doing the Watusi, what are they actually doing? Surely information on that must exist in some source. AJD (talk) 05:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the dance?
Talk:Pope Liberius

message: " the earliest pope who did not become a saint.".. I noted that the earlier Pope Marcellinus is not mentioned to have been sanctified either... is this an oversight, a result of confusion of historicity, or soemthing else? -FZ 02:54, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Marcellinus was sainted. savidan(talk) (e@) 15:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The image in the infobox is not of this pope but of a later saint -- Dan Fefferman  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.95.4 (talk) 21:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture doesn't match

message: Would new advent be a good source to remove the tag of cn? I'm referring to this link https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09217a.htm which was already quoted as a note in the infobox. Temp0000002 (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is now changed. I believe the citation tag can be removed. Temp0000002 (talk) 12:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Needed
Talk:List of maritime explorers

message: Just to state that this list is part of the paralel goal of the WikiAward for Greatest Sea Explorer of the period of the discoveries. 
* If you do not know what are the WikiAwards just find out here.
* If you already know registerr as participant and cho0se a category to vote. This Awards is part of the History category. 
Have fun, see the results, watch Wikipedia grow...--Gameiro Pais 04:34, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiAward for greatest sea explorer 

message: I suggest that the list is placed in a table:
Nationality	Name,                 	First voyage of exploration	Last  voyage of exploration	Arctic	North Atlantic	Indian	Pacific	South Atlantic	Southern
      	de Abreu, Antonio     	                      	                      	 	         	 	  	         	 
      	de Albuquerque, Afonso	                      	                      	 	         	 	  	         	 
      	Cook, James           	1768–71                    	1776–79                    	 	         	 	3      	         	1
      	Drake,Francis         	1577–81                    	1577–81                    	 	         	1     	1      	1             	 
So that readers can sort on name or date or Ocean explored. (The numbers represent the number of voyages of discovery in that ocean). Other columns such as national flags could be added as eye candy etc. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 13:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, but I'm not very good at building tables, and have not discovered a quick way of making large tables. Did you type this sample up, or is there a quick way? Wish there was a way to convert spreadsheets to tables in Wiki format.--mrg3105 (comms) If you're not taking any flak, you're not over the target. 13:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Table

message: Removing (most of) this from the article:
power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria
Talk:On-base percentage

message: I think it's worth noting that intentional outs (sacrifice bunts) are also not included in either the numerator or the denominator of the formula.
----
From VfD:
This article should be merged with Baseball statistics. - Allyunion 04:52, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bolded him as an active player because he has not officially filed retirement with the Commissioners' office or MLBPA, and intends to play this season.Bradenkeith (talk) 02:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Barry Bonds

message: I think all references to Bonds need to be annotated in some way to show that his number were chemically enhanced w/ steroids.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tapered (talk • contribs) 06:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steroids Asterisk 

message: There is something wrong with the OBP with regard to fielding errors.  The fielding error counts as an AB, but the runner reached base.  Why is it that the OBP penalizing the player by recording the AB but not including the fact that the player is on base?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.190.51 (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors and OBP 

message: The OBP statistics referenced herein do not agree at all with the official OBP statistics at mlb.com. This glaring inconsistency should at the very least be addressed. Ty Cobb, for example, is credited with a .4330 OBP by the referenced list, good for 9th all time. Yet according to mlb.com, he has a career .424 OBP, good for 7th all time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.66.20 (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I see Ty Cobb shown with a career .433 OBP at mlb.com; see .  BRMo (talk) 19:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistical Incinsistency 

message: I think it’s important to note that Eddie Gaedel has the highest OBP of 1.00 49.180.155.184 (talk) 02:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A player with one lifetime plate appearance in MLB is inconsequential to the game and does not merit mention here. Mindmatrix 11:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddie Gaedel
Talk:Hasso von Manteuffel

message: I met his great-nephew David Manteuffel when he was a Captain in the neighboring tank battalion (3-68 Armor) in Mannheim,around 1981/82.  He related that his father was a younger brother of the family who emigrated after World War One.74.130.83.208 (talk) 11:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Manteuffel family 

message: "...thus missing out on the campaigns in Poland and France."
I wonder if that sounds "sound" to a native English speaker as in my opinion it sounds like he missed something - like viewing a nice movie with his wife or so ... but that was (unjust) WAR and only the most silly of people would feel cheated when they can't participate for some reason. But hell, I see that kind of comment also in connection with current members of the Anglo/American armed forces, so maybe it's just a different view. Nice world, really ...
--JB.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.186.152.50 (talk) 16:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really ? 

message: How is he related to Edwin Freiherr von Manteuffel, or is he? Ditto for Otto Theodor von Manteuffel. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncle Edwin ? 

message: Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup
Talk:Datura

message: At 17. DATURA Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 179. 1753 they note that there are three species of datura found in China; Datura inoxia Miller (毛曼陀罗 mao man tuo luo), Datura metel Linnaeus (洋金花 yang jin hua) and Datura stramonium Linnaeus (曼陀罗 man tuo luo).   All are native to the Americas, but introduced to China at some point. Earnulf Gery (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Datura in China 

message: I removed the claim that datura was "brought to Europe by the Romani people". The cite given was Coby Michael's "The Poison Path Herbal". 
According to a webpage for the author, he is a teacher of "plant magic...and traditional witchcraft". From excerpts provided, the book discusses the ability of poisonous plants to "open us up to the spirit world...in order to work magic, prophesy, and commune with spirits." It offers guidance on how to make magical "flying ointments" and how to use poisonous plants as "spirit familiars".
This doesn't seem like a strong source for a historical claim of this nature. 110.23.152.248 (talk) 10:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romani
Talk:Expression

message: I do not like the type of definions as found here (expression) and elsewhere.
Reasons:
"Expression is the act of expressing something" is tautological, or at least not educative, because expression is a noun formed from the verb to express, something you would have guessed yourself.
Now if you do not happen to know what the verb express mean (apart from disambiguation) your are lost immediately.
Always think of non-native speaking users (of the English language) who cannot learn anything from such phrasing. Further examples inclue:
journalist:  "A journalist is a person who engages in journalism" - so what is a journal, to start with?
If you see this point, you may also consider the idea that in coming to any page of wikipedia with the purpose of learning both content and the language, an introductiory passage on what words you should be familair with before you start reading the one you have just hit could be just as handy as the existing links to further reading and forking at the end of an article.
Apogr 06:00, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: I think expression can be used as a synonym for exocytosis or secretion, as in the term "constitutive expression" - but I'm just a dilettante.
D021317c 09:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cell biology 

message: I 💜 math 38.49.94.229 (talk) 21:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math
Talk:Chorus of Westerly

message: For an August 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Chorus of Westerly
----
The dispute on factual accuracy posted by User:Samuel J. Howard is based on whether the home church of the Chorus of Westerly is a former Methodist church, as stated in the entry and in their webpage, or a former Catholic church, which seems to be an impression so firmly established in User:Samuel J. Howard's mind that he was willing to take this action. Wetman 06:22, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. I fixed it.  So easy. Wetman
---
I think some mention of a few of the previous famous productions...specifically the one I can't remember (from my childhood in the 80's) involving a medievil castle and dragon theme where each room had a new proformance and you needed to collect jewels.SummerOtaku 16:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bipolar Integrated Technology

message: I have removed the ATM link because it is unclear what the acronym refers to.  If you know, please put in a direct link. -SCEhardt 20:01, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it has been fixed thanks to User:Dyl -SCEhardt 04:22, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ATM link
Talk:Land value tax

message: That statement cites a paper by Stiglitz favoring LVT, but "generally favored by economists" means that economists in general favor it, not that some economists favor it.  The way tax economists actually discuss tax policy, you'd think LVT was a fringe theory. John Moser (talk) 23:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Generally favored by economists" is dubious 

message: The fundamental base of LVT is reclaiming commonly created wealth to use for common purposes. Nowhere does it say this.  
. 152.37.76.153 (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a deeper explanation
Talk:Toni Morrison

message: space is a place where there's good and bad there's black holes galaxy's and other things that we don't know about people are trying to find were we can live a life so they have sacrifise there live to find us a home and maybe some other life like alien's or other galaxy's we can live for or depend on . no one knows about that and thank you but i'm not in collage                                                                                                                                           love,aubrey                                    16÷3=6 HA HA 73.53.131.161 (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  space
Talk:St. Matthews, Kentucky

message: Why does St. Matthews redirect here?  There's another St. Matthews in South Carolina. 68.40.65.164 01:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed --W.marsh 01:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed 

message: We should explain what the infrastructure problems were. Also, we need a better source detailing that the cause of incorporation was wanting to build sewers: almost everyone else incorporating in Jefferson County from the 1950s to the '70s were trying to avoid the taxes involved in expanding Louisville's sewer system. — LlywelynII 06:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorporation
Talk:International King of Sports

message: As of summer 2006 this article seems to be quite outdated.  "Current" references are
referring to 2003-2004.
The show was cancelled by Five partway into the 2004 series for a special week of programmes on cosmetic surgery, and, AFAIK, the remaining episodes haven't been broadcast Elcondor 14:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quite outdated
Talk:Marquess of Londonderry

message: I added the factually disputed tag after misreading the page (blame the sleepless night). I realised my mistake, and I thought I'd removed the tag, guess not. Sorry about that, the tag is now removed :) Darksun 09:04, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 post

message: Never heard of it being pronounced like that before so i've added a citation tag as i'd like to see the proof that this wierd pronounciation is real. Mabuska (talk) 11:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --217.155.32.221 (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Lundundry

message: Just reverted the eventual courtesy title for the grandson to "Lord Stewart" and not "The Hon. X. Vane-Temple-Stewart". The source was a general one with no specific info about the Londonderry titles, I replaced with another one who adresses specifically this issue. 93.21.40.101 (talk) 10:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord Stewart
Talk:Rojak

message: rojak
----
Welcome rojak and enjoy Wikipedia. Many old Users can give a hand.Vanderesch 10:32, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rojak 

message: Having spent very little time in Southeast Asia, it still strikes me that the tough, bitter, cold-loving turnip is an unlikely ingredient for a Southeast Asian salad, and I suspect that the writer intended the crisp, sweet, warmth-loving jicama.  Can you help me decide?  Thanks — Pekinensis 14:17, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turnip? 

message: I mentioned in the Mango article that green mango is used in rujak (rojak), based on Indonesian rujak. What about Malaysia? We should add a reference to mango, either way.  Singkong2005 12:59, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mango? 

message: I found a nice picture of Indian rojak here, but the WP:BRP looks real daunting to me. Anyone familiar witht the procedure and willing to ask the owner? --Dodo bird 10:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Langevin equation

message: To do: 
-Add a section (or a new page? or both with one a summary of the other?) on noise terms, explaining what is meant by a 'continuous random function', what is needed to specify it (correlation functions) (i.e. the systems described on the page are not completely specified).
-More examples of Langevin equations (e.g.from lasers, chemical kinetics, population dynamics etc.)
-Tidy up inline maths (...help on this would be good...)
SgtThroat 11:37, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do 

message: Another form of the Langevin used in Statistical mechanics ignores inertial accelerations like ma, and instead approximate the velocity of the suspended particles as having a velocity that is linearly related to the forces acting upon the particle.  This is in the small particle limit, so m \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} is negligible in comparision to the other terms.  Consequently, the form of "the" Langevin equation I am used to using is
\zeta \frac{d \mathbf{x}}{dt} = \frac{\partial \mathbf {V}}{\partial x} + \mathbf {f} \left (t \right)
where the f(t) term is the stochastic variable and \frac{1}{\zeta} is known as the "mobility" of the particle in a viscous fluid.  
Whilst this would be a minor edit to the page, I think it is a valid one to mention this small particle limit.  --Lateralis 22:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Another form 

message: Can we add a clarification to what the variables mean?  I know what m, ma, d, dv and F are, but the majority of people looking this up on Wikipedia are probably doing so because they are unfamiliar with Physics.  I am still working on figuring out B and n(t)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bvbellomo (talk • contribs) 13:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Variables clarification

message: I added a link to the Wiener process page for the noise term. Also, this article really should be combined with the Langevin dynamics page.
Nonfcomm (talk) 21:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a very short merge discussion on the talk page there. At Talk:Langevin dynamics. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 23:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Langevin dynamics]] 

message: I'm having difficulty understanding the meaning of these equations because theres no mention here (or anywhere that i can find so far on the internet) as to what the index is referring to within the equations. Is it as simple as coordinates? or a more complicated set of operators?     — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.167.5.177 (talk) 13:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Index? 

message: This section should use the same conventions as other sections: \lambda for the damping coefficient and \eta for the fluctating force. After all it should be article and not a collection of sections.
radical_in_all_things (talk) 09:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that this was fixed, at some point in the past. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 22:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Recovering Boltzmann Statistic
Talk:Tokugawa Ieyasu

message: I am no expert but Tokugawa Ieyasu was probably not shogun from 2018 to 2020.
130.225.198.235 (talk) 10:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  Now fixed.--Chewings72 (talk) 11:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of being shogun 

message: There are a vast number of duplicate links in this article. For example, Oda Nobunaga is linked maybe 18 times, Toyotomi Hideyoshi some 20 times. Is there a reason for this? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate links