lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Andrew Parker Bowles

message: I think the writer of this article has done well here, but is it possible to have the sources? If some info. was acquired from books, I think that should be noted accordingly, with ISBNs and everything. --Ashley Rovira 15:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Was Parker-Bowles' marriage to Camilla ever annulled by Catholic Church standards? Taram (talk) 07:26, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Annullment

message: Camilla’s official title is queen consort not queen.  As per the Queen Elizabeth’s wishes which was accepted by the current king. 2A02:C7D:5D53:4F00:D88E:DC67:ED59:DC00 (talk) 17:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: When referring to a Queen Consort it is perfectly acceptable to say "Queen [Name]". The Queen Consort of any country which has a monarchy is Queen of that country alongside their husband the King. Camilla is a Queen by rank, regardless of the fact she is a Queen Consort and not a Regnant. Therefore, Queen Camilla is perfectly fine. It's the same way we never called the late Queen Elizabeth "Queen Regnant Elizabeth." 81.140.89.191 (talk) 12:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camilla’s official title is queen consort. 

message: Is there a source confirming the official spelling of the family name is "Parker Bowles" (no hyphen) vs "Parker-Bowles" (hyphen)?  I've seen sources going both ways, including in the article.  Or is this a WP:MOS issue I'm forgetting? –Grondemar 21:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No hyphen  cagliost (talk) 08:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parker Bowles or Parker-Bowles?
Talk:Andrew Pelling

message: The parliament website still lists him as an Independent - did he actually rejoin the Conservative whip? — sjorford++ 23:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservative? 

message: I'm trying to reproduce the last sentence in the first paragraph as a grammatically correct one but there's a constant edit conflict.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.98.185 (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: There's no mention in his article about him being employed while officially being on (paid) sick leave from the house of commons.
Surely this should be mentioned?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.24.233.173 (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working while on sick leave.... 

message: "The Leader of London’s Green Party" the Greens do not have such a position. WHO was it who said this? Maybe their name can be included here. OR at least a proper source - as now it's rumour.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 23:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's now sourced as a claim made on AP's own website. This in a way removes the problem of the allegedly non-existent Green position, since we are now simply reporting verbatim what Pelling says. With more research it might be possible to source the original statement, but I wouldn't hold your breath, and this is not bad for now. Hope this helps, best wishes, DBaK (talk) 00:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Leader of Greens??
Talk:Spine (botany)

message: Why is this under Spine (botany) when even the introduction mentions that some animals have spines? PeepP 12:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A good question that has yet been answered. Also, why does Spine (Biology) link here when animals have them too? Robrecht 02:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Are spines and prickles the same thing?  Rojomoke (talk) 16:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prickles 

message: See Talk:Thorn (botany)#Merger proposal. bd2412 T 16:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Andrew Phillips, Baron Phillips of Sudbury

message: I've not come to a firm conclusion of removing this section yet, though I think it is unbalanced (unfair) as currently written, and the criticism essentially comes from a single publication.  Looking at :WP:BLP for guidance I find of relevance:
* in Public figures scn: "If you cannot find multiple reliable third-party sources documenting the allegation or incident, leave it out."
* in Balance scn: "Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone. Do not give disproportionate space to particular viewpoints" and "The idea ... that it is therefore okay for an article to be temporarily unbalanced because it will eventually be brought into shape – does not apply to biographies."
I'd welcome any further relevant guidance being pointed out. In the meantime I'll make some changes to the section. Rwendland (talk) 11:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing the Israel and Jews section
Talk:Andrew Pyle (philosopher)

message: Does Andrew Pyle deserve a wikipedia page?  Biographies of living people must be people of some significance, and this person does not seem to have any significance.  There is no citation of anything on the page.  Additionally, the neutrality of the article could be debated, especially the claim that he "is an authority on the history of philosophical atomism."  Who decided that?  And what makes the topic he researched "ill addressed"?
82.46.92.29 (talk) 11:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: gBooks shows subject to be a prolific author and editor, gScholar shows a significant presence (including 282 citations for one work, 181 for another). Clearly notable. Could the article use work? Yes. But it has only recently been tagged as such. 74.69.39.11 (talk) 14:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

text: gBooks shows twenty works in total (it says 103, but only actually shows 20), only two of which are original works.  Most appear to be compilations of essays by other authors.  One of his original works is his PhD dissertation, the other is his work on Malebranche.  It does not seem that this meets the requirements under wikipedia:ACADEMIC 94.171.225.21 (talk) 08:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

text: I do not think that this person fulfills the criterion for inclusion. Consider the notability guidelines for academics . It doesn't clearly appear that this academic fulfills any of these criterion. The onus is on the proponent including this person into wikipedia to provide references and sources to prove that they fulfill the criterion. Kantian (talk) 20:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion Discussion
Talk:Andrew Raines

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: article is a reasonably complete stub but with some choppy non-encyclopedic language  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 09:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:Andrew Rawnsley

message: * Angry Gordon Brown 'hit out at aide and yanked secretary from her chair', Mail on Sunday, 31 January 2010
"Well-placed sources say the Prime Minister has been accused of hitting a senior adviser, pulling a secretary out of her chair and hurling foul-mouthed abuse at aides while distraught over an alleged snub by President Barack Obama.
The claims, which are fiercely denied by Mr Brown's allies, are linked to a new book about Mr Brown by respected political journalist Andrew Rawnsley.
In researching the book, The End Of The Party, due to be published on March 1, Mr Rawnsley has investigated allegations that Mr Brown flew into a number of wild rages since he succeeded Tony Blair as Prime Minister. The publishers say his accounts are so detailed that readers will think he has 'bugs in the vases at No10'"
This is a 'heads up'.  There may be trouble ahead, so please let's keep an eye on these articles. --Mais oui! (talk) 08:46, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious allegations about Gordon Brown 
Talk:Andrew Sarris

message: An Andrew Sarris was the subject of a Warhol screen test in 1964. 
http://www.moma.org/momaorg/shared/pdfs/docs/learn/Andy_Warhol_Screen_Tests-inventory.pdf
Same person? Rosekelleher (talk) 17:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warhol screen test? 
Talk:Andrew Sean Greer

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Andrew Selous

message: Infobox completely cuts the rest of the page by jumping to the top.
77.101.168.238 (talk) 08:21, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you be more specific, it looks and works fine for me and I don't understand what problem you're facing.SSSB (talk) 09:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page broken
Talk:Andrew Shue

message: I wish to meeting CEO since I have started a charitable foundation in Kenya.is it possible
 Emmanuel Njuguna macharia (talk) 19:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emmanuel Njuguna macharia
Talk:Andrew Smith (field hockey)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  —fetch·comms 15:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Andrew Soltis

message: Hi, this article needs some references to back up Mr. Soltis's notability.  --Rocksanddirt 20:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third party references 

message: WP:BLP is a high level priority one policy on the Wikipedia. There isn’t a policy which trumps it. Indeed, WP:BLOG makes this clear: “Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.”  (Emphasis in original).  That in mind, we can not put contentious claims about Mr. Soltis in this article unless they are published by reliable sources.  It doesn’t matter if Edward Winter is an expert.  It doesn’t matter if we attribute the contentious claim to Mr. Winter.  We can not put contentious claims about a living person in the Wikipedia until a more reliable source than Winter’s blog publishes the claim in question!  That’s Wikipedia policy. Samboy (talk) 17:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:BLP]] trumps [[WP:BLOG]]
Talk:Andrew Surman

message: he is hot! i have met him lots!he knows who i am and everything!! :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.226.251 (talk) 22:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew surman 
Talk:Andrew Tobias

message: hi how are you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.204.77.190 (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo request 

message: LOL at whomever wrote "he wasn't comfortable revealing his orientation to a broad audience.
Exactly what 1973 did you live through?  It would've ruined his career.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.230.72.43 (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closet 
Talk:Andrew Turner (politician)

message: There's no footnotes in this article.  Because of that I can't rate it higher than a Stub, even though it has a lot of material, especially as proper referencing is important for Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. This urgently needs addressing. --Peeky44 (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Many references have now been added. As a result, I have increased the article to 'start' class. Editor5807speak 11:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Ok, the names 'Bert' and 'Socks' have now been removed. Editor5807speak 12:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dana boomer (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Andrew Tyrie

message: In the article it says:
:He served in Michael Howard's shadow cabinet as Shadow Financial Secretary to the Treasury between November 2003-March 4 and Shadow Paymaster General between March 2004 - May 5.
Is that supposed to mean "November 2003 - March 2004" and "March 2004 - May 2005"? If so, I think that's what the article should say. --bodnotbod (talk) 14:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Now fixed 86.185.161.102 (talk) 11:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't understand this...
Talk:Only Unity Saves the Serbs

message: Šta je pravilnije?
Translation: Which is more correct? --anon
Both ar equally correct, though I personally prefer spašava. --estavisti 20:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's disputed among some linguists: "spasava" (inf. spasti) is considered more pure Serbian, while "spašava" (inf. spasiti) is considered irregular and/or Croatian. Nonetheless, "spašava" is widely accepted and used in Serbian colloquial language and by Serbian media, much to the chagrin of some language purists. Read more about it here. El Cazangero 01:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spašava ili Spasava? 

message: Do the chetniks use this phrase? or do all serbs of all beliefs use this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.95.114.241 (talk) 20:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who uses this phrase 

message: The template with the suggestion is from 2011, and not much has happened. Anyway, I vote for the merger, this seems almost like a dictionary entry, and it's closely related to the other article since the motto is a part of it. Anonimski (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Serbian cross]]
Talk:Andrew Whiteman

message: I've changed 
"Whiteman went on to produce a solo effort, Fear of Zen, in 1995, as well as an album with the band Que Vida in 1998."
To:
"Whiteman went on to record Fear of Zen in 1995 with the band Que Vida!".
Argolin (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography
Talk:Andy Whittall

message: Either there is a language issue here or this statement makes no sense...  Does Mr. Whittall teach math or just sit around and read math books?  I'm going to change it to read he teaches math again.  Please explain here if it's reverted back to "reads maths textbooks". --Onorem 10:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads maths textbooks
Talk:Andrew Yao

message: Here is a great photograph of Andrew Yao  but the copyright holder needs to be contacted to see if they will permit its use on Wikipedia. Wingman4l7 (talk) 06:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy with the current photograph of him, that one reminds me a bit too much of Qian Xuesen. Theheezy (talk) 02:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  better photograph 
Talk:Andrew York (guitarist)

message: I just cleaned out quite a few spammy links and some promotional prose.  While the article doesn't read as much like an advertisement as it did before none of it is sourced.  If anyone has the necessary reference material the article needs the help. SQGibbon (talk) 05:16, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with article 
Talk:Andrey Abduvaliyev

message: His personal best was 83.46m in 1990. 
Not so, Yuriy Sedykh's WR of 86.74 was set four years earlier. 83.46 was only his PB, but since he represented USSR at the time, it's considered a European mark. Representing Tajikistan his best was 83.36 from 1993, the Asian record until Koji Murofushi broke it in 2003.   (his 1997 best 82.66 is perhaps NR for Uzbekistan, though I'm unsure whether or not it was set after his change of nationality).
--Anshelm '77 (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andrey Kurkov

message: In a previous version of this wikipedia article it contained the phrase: It is interesting to note that as a Ukrainian writing in Russian, Kurkov has come under criticism from some of his contemporaries for not supporting the blossoming Ukrainian literary movement. This analysis of current Ukrainian politics by him makes it clear he is not a Russian nationalist. — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 19:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is interesting to note.... 

message: Shouldn't these refer to the original publication dates in russian (not the case now), and not dates for the publication of translations? This list gives the apperance that he has only been active the last 4 years.
Fileunderwater (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication dates in bibliography
Talk:Andrey Zaliznyak

message: It is clear from the Borschev & Partee’s obituary that this linguist had a "long-standing personal preference" for the spelling Zalizniak. The existence of this variant is admitted in Iosad et al.’s obituary. It is also the only variant used by Åkerman. Apparently, his daughter (also a linguist) also uses only i-spelling (e.g.). Surprisingly, in the English metadata of his papers the usual variant is Zaliznyak. The only Zalizniak’s paper written entirely in Enlgish that I was able to find (in fact, an English translation of Russian paper, but still) uses Zaliznjak… I have no access to his French publications, but I am pretty sure that one can find there i-spelling.
Moreover, I am even less sure what spelling of his name should be used: André, Andréi, Andrei, Andrey or Andrej… @Ghirlandajo, @Gnosandes, @Lembit Staan, what do you think? Дитмар (talk) 12:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Keeping triyng: @Muspilli, @Serge925, @Ymblanter, probably you have some thoughts on the question. Дитмар (talk) 10:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Just someone needs to perform an analysis of existing English sources and come up with a RM if needed. Ymblanter (talk) 10:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname spelling
Talk:Paddy Considine

message: mikejamestaylor (talk) 20:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

message: * at the very least remove the "many sources erroneously quote his year of birth as 1974" bit; I know WP is infamous for inaccuracies but there's no cause to boast when it is correct 77.107.161.113 (talk) 13:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article as it stands, especially the lede is ridiculously hagiographic and reads like it was written by his agent's PR team. I'm going to start making it more factual, and show not tell. Ashmoo (talk) 10:23, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:Andrij Dobriansky

message: Please WP:AGF, and move discussion about this article to this WP:TP instead of WP:BRD. Thank you, tufkaa (talk) 17:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening new discussion for article
Talk:Andrija Delibašić

message: This guy never played for Benfica. BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk)
:It´s not our problem that you don´t remember him... Lê lá e informa-te um bocadinho antes de fazeres afirmações erradas com essa pompa toda. FkpCascais (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Blogs are not reliable sources. "English, *******, do you speak it?" BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk) 02:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

text: I know blogs aren´t reliable sources but, come on, just with a bit of googling you would see that he did spent half a season na Luz. Abraço :D FkpCascais (talk) 02:28, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  S.L. Benfica 
Talk:Andris Biedriņš

message: How is his name pronounced? 67.188.172.165 21:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciaton

message: I would like to edit Biendrins team to Jazz. Involved into a Sign/trade deal
Derek Austin Murphy (talk) 14:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you see the announcement on the top of the page? We'll wait for official announcement and then everything will be changed. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 19:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 9 July 2013 
Talk:Andriy Husin

message: Does "Being killed in a motorcycle crash in Kiev on 17 September 2014, Husin was survived by wife and three children." really sound better than "Andriy Husin was killed in a motorcycle crash in Kiev on 17 September 2014, and is survived by his wife and three children."? His wife and children are still alive, so the main sentence should be in the present tense, I think. User Tandrum seems to think otherwise.--Mycomp (talk) 23:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording 
Talk:Andriy Rusol

message: On 6th January 2010 a series of immature posts appeared on Liverpool Website www.redandwhitekop.com linking him to a move to Liverpool FC. The thread is currently open which is suprising considering the website's reputation for constantly closing down topics at the slightest chance. This has led to rumours of an affair between the topic starter L6 Red and cheif locker and reported manic depressive Veinticinco de Mayo.http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=252015.0
The above comment was removed. It is not really relevant. Jonknight73 (talk) 21:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled