Talk:Ben Tulfo

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 04:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: :Image:Ben bitag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ben bitag.jpg

message: Please remove this article because the information given in this page is not official. The person being discussed in this article sees this page as an insult to his personality. He also want this page to be immediately deleted because that person is a known media personality who have many threats from his enemies or other people against him. Please remove this as soon as possible. This is also his official order/request.
Bstvideos (talk) 09:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: If you're looking to get this page deleted, you should proceed at WP:AFD.  Cannolis (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2015 

message: Requesting to incorporate official bio http://www.bitagmedia.com/about-ben-tulfo/
:If by "incorporate official bio" you are requesting that the official biography be copied word-for-word into this Wikipedia article, I'm afraid that cannot be done. Wikipedia is an open-source project: we are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which permits our readers to reuse our text for whatever purpose they desire. As a result, copyrighted text for which we lack permission to reuse is incompatible with our free license, and cannot be included in our articles except under extremely limited circumstances as detailed in the Non-free content policy. If you or your organization holds the copyright to your proposed text and is willing to release it under a free license, it is possible to grant Wikipedia permission for reuse by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. But the preferred solution is to simply rewrite the text in your own words, which has the added benefit of maintaining a consistent editorial tone across Wikipedia's articles. Thanks, Altamel (talk) 02:41, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing the fact that someone apparently wanted to incorporate the official biography of my colleague, can the editors please use that as a reference by typing this in their own words? All of Ben Tulfo's information regarding his TV show, "BITAG", and his media history can be found on the website. Ben encourages the editors to use his official biography to avoid confusion with his website's contents. I have already requested for the same thing in another section at Wikipedia and I'm hoping for editors to pick it up and start editing. Like he said, he's already making this public for the world to know the legitimacy of this information by providing it on his company's website. Kind regards, OccultaCogitat (talk) 20:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  We actually prefer independent sources for obvious reasons. Kleuske (talk) 22:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating of the page 

message: Seeing that this page lacks the necessary details and of course, we can't utilize the information provided by a source that is linked directly to my colleague, I am already requesting for deletion since with the little amount of articles to support any edits executed by anyone, I believe this page will no longer serve its purpose properly.
The contents of this page, again, is considered inaccurate and outdated.
Hoping to hear a response from the editors in-charge. This page is already creating confusion for those who are looking for proper info regarding Ben.
Kind regards, OccultaCogitat (talk) 01:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Deletion 

message: Sir pahelp po nadali po Kami SA isang same.po namin na ka OFW...offer Kami nang isang PALUWAGAN po tas now po dami napong client po till now po dipo niya nareliese po Pera nmin painghirapan po namin yon ..maawa po kayo samin sir ISA Lang po akong OFW po single mother SA taking anak at breedwinner SA family kopo sir may apo pa akong dalawa maawa nmn po kayo sakin sir marami Kami na genagu po nang babaemg NSA davao po Siya naktir asir 87.201.238.188 (talk) 10:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  People concern