lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crawdaunt

message: I'm a little concerned about this sentence in the TCG section:  "Most Crawdaunt cards are Stage-1 Pokémon cards, and are primarily used to play stronger cards (such as Stage-2 Pokémon, like Charizard)."  First of all, isn't Crawdaunt always a Stage-1 card?  More importantly, I'm afraid we're stating that Crawdaunt can be used to play a Stage-2 card, but Crawdaunt doesn't evolve.  --Brandon Dilbeck 18:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage-1 TCG card 

message: Should the last paragraph in the introduction be made into an Appearance/Biology section? I'd like to but I'm not sure if its a good idea... --Floramage! 20:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All it is is a description of Crawdaunt's appearance—to me, this doesn't seem broad enough for the introduction.  --Brandon Dilbeck 00:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance/Biology 

message: This is a proposal to remove some of the content that I believe is unnecessary to the Crawdaunt article. Addressing Vikrant's question, yes, I want this article to be a GA. I am not trying to prevent that.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 16:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: [Removed sections] Since no one has replied and the article seems to be improving somewhat, I'm removing these sections. I will work on the article and try to explain my edits well enough in the edit summaries to justify my changes (and content pruning where it seems useful).—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 15:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving article content

message: I am very impressed with this article. I think it should soon be nominated for FA.  Also...I actually put A class into the project templates because I think it is good enough for A class (better than GA). Funpika 00:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA pass

message: I've filed a Good Article review over this article, no comment on the talk page was given when this was article was immedietly delisted, and unlike Ivysaur and Charizard, this edit summary didn't even try to explain what the problems were or what should be improved. Homestarmy 00:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Guide content. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA/R

message: Although this article has one out of universe sentence in the beginning of the biological characteristics section, the rest is highly in-universe.  Crawdaunt is fictional, and so is its biology, but the text doesn't really reflect this. -Malkinann 22:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In-universe
Talk:Mightyena

message: The biology of the Mightyena looks as if someone took someone else's article on wolves and just replaced "wolf" with "Mightyena". --68.127.113.20 02:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm? 

message: Mightyena is my favorite Pokemon. I would like to know its stats (HP, attack, defense, etc.). Is that possible? I think you should add stats to all the Pokemon and links to Pokemon websites.Pizza Sammy 22:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mightyena Rocks!!! 

message: Ok, there's a small paragraph in this page regarding information the Beast of Gevaudan. I feel this should be removed from this page on Mightyena since it has little (in fact, nothing) to do with the pokemon itself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.111.137.236 (talk) 04:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beast of Gevaudan
Talk:Umbreon

message: I have to disagree here. I'd say that it's more of a Statistical Wall, because it's fire power is quite lacking. H2P (Yell at me for what I've done) 19:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistical Tank 

message: I thought Umbreon evolved from 12 midnight until 12 noon, so shouldnt the article say AM? just checking... Jackacon 18:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it is version-dependent; I had an Espeon evolve at ~11:00 (AM) in G/S/C. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What version of the game do you have? -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Version-dependent.  I personally think, however, that evolution is based on the time of day you received Eevee, so double check to make sure that it's when Eevee maxes out happiness, and not the time of day you received it from FR/LG. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolution during PM?
Talk:Flygon

message: Is it worth mentioning Flygon's part in Jirachi: Wishmaker? Crowstar 22:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth Mentioning? 

message: In the role section under anime, it says that Drew and May finished in second place in the Grand Festivals which has nothing to do with Flygon whatsoever. LatiRider 05:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Who the hell are you waiting for to delete it then, Tron? -Jeske (v^_^v) 20:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

text: See Tron (film), then see Tron (character). I hadn't realized there was a disambig page till later. -Jeske (v^_^v) 01:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off Subject
Talk:Flaaffy

message: The article ramdomly bounces back and forth between one f and two. Which one is correct? RememberMe? 19:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Flaaffy, I checked on Serebii.The Phantomad 11:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's Get This Straight - Flaaffy or Flaafy?
Talk:Magnemite

message: I've gone with the general consensus from other pages that the plural of a Pokémon's name is the same as the singular, eg. one Pikachu, two Pikachu.  I've also made some adjustments to the tone of some aspects of the article to make the language seem slightly more formal.  --Kain 12:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plurals of Pokémon names
Talk:Manectric

message: I've seen the name Romanized as Livolt (http://pmr.okinawa-connection.com/images/livolt.jpg), though this was from a CoroCoro Comic scan in one of their promotional posters (thus it might not be credible). Though it would make sense since it could be a combination of Lion and Volt. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by XenoL-Type (talk • contribs) 09:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to admit I like "Livolt" more, since it corresponds with the English name nicely ("mane" and "electric").—ウルタプ 03:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanized name? 
Talk:Administrative divisions of Bashkortostan

message: I have, for the moment, removed the link to "organs" as it was to the disambiguation page, that unhelpfully had no useful on link for the reader.  If you can find a suitable on-link, please direct it to that link.  I have, instead popped a link to "Local Government" in there.
LeeG 23:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: use of "organs"
Talk:Voltorb

message: Shouldn't that category be renamed? According to the article, Voltorb is basically an artificial Pokémon, originated from synthetic materials, so maybe 'Biology' isn't the ideal word to describe it. Whaddaya think? Fray Andrés de Pentarillo 02:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology? 

message: Yes, I know I still haven't made an account, but my mom said she will look into it. Anyway, all of these sources are pretty much, "It's not well designed." I'm not sure that makes it any more notable than Garbodor or Vanillite. 2605:B40:1303:900:54E7:6B7A:FA98:A4 (talk) 02:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My argument is that it defines what came after it (other object Pokemon like Garbodor or Klefki are often directly compared to it) and it's cited often as an example of some of Gen 1's shortcomings, albeit with a few pointing out reasons for such a simple design. Even the ValNet articles, while I realize they aren't everyone's cup of tea, do at least offer analysis on it, and I've got another I'd like to add once I'm certain this won't get nuked.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?
Talk:Victor Ashe

message: --A. B. 23:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I added a source template to the Ambassador to Poland section of this article.  I am specifically concerned about the last paragraph of this section.
Ashe is ambassador during the investigations into rendition, kidnapping and torture by the United States Central Intelligence Agency, at Black sites in Poland [10]. CIA is traditionally based in the United States embassy, which is traditionally used as a cover story for covert operations involving terrorism and narcotics trafficking, under orders of the White House [11].
This paragraph should be better sourced, or else deleted.  The first reference given is from www.rawstory.com.  The Wikipedia article about that cite says it is a "left-leaning news and politics weblog founded in 2004."  I don't think we should include this information unless there is more evidence from another more reliable source, unless someone can verify the reliability of www.rawstory.com.
The second sentence in the paragraph quoted above is sourced from a long narrative about the Iran/Contra affair.  I didn't bother to read it (it is quite long).  But it doesn't appear to be concerned in any way with the U.S. Embassy in Poland.
That second sentence actually seems to be advocating U.S. embassies traditionally comply with the CIA and the White House to provide for terrorism and the drug trade.  It appears to be baloney to me.  Can someone provide some additional sources?  If not, I will delete this paragraph.  JBFrenchhorn (talk) 00:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: At least half of this section seems to be totally bogus (and not backed up by the sources cited). For starters, you only have to be 21 to serve in the state house, not 30. You have to be 30 to serve in the state senate, but he didn't run for state senate until 1974. Kaldari (talk) 23:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term in the Tennessee House of Representatives
Talk:Neon Boys

message: "The Neon Boys' first s/t single is arguably the first punk rock single of all time."
Except that it wasn't released until 1980.  Given that fact I don't think they have that much stronger a claim to the title than NY Dolls, or Stooges, to name only two. Anazgnos 23:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: chronology

message: Wikinews is to interview Richard Hell about his life, music, career and future.  If you have a serious question for Hell, please leave it on my talk page under the title "Richard Hell interview".  This message will be struck out once I am no longer accepting questions.  --David Shankbone 00:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikinews to interview Richard Hell
Talk:Rectangular function

message: I haven't read the rest of user:Jens VF history, but I deleted a clearly false claim at the beginning of the article. 69.5.112.154 (talk) 22:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that the Fourier integral (of sinc in this case) converges to the midpoint wherever the resulting function jumps is a well-known theorem in Fourier theory, see "The value of the integral is f(t), whenever f(t) is continuous, and is equal to the average of left and right limits whenever f(t) has jumps." in Kaplan, Operational Methods for Linear Systems (1962) THEOREM 2, p.241. The particular case of the Fourier transform of sinc is given as an example. Jens VF (talk) 10:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The midpoint need not be 1/2 for the Fourier Transform of rect to be sinc. 

message: Shouldn't the last equation be  \mathcal{F} \delta (t) = 1, ? or conversely \mathcal{F^{-1}} \delta (f) = 1/{2\pi},    Groovamos (talk) 22:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last equation 

message: I can't attach any definite meaning to this discussion in the current version .. 
 Note that as long as the definition of the pulse function is only motivated by its behavior in the time-domain experience, there is no reason to believe that the oscillatory interpretation (i.e. the Fourier transform function) should be intuitive, or directly understood by humans.
Would anyone object to cutting the whole sentence (as 'not directly understandable by humans') ? Tdent (talk) 21:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove vague text?
Talk:Franchthi Cave

message: From Article: The cave shows occupation from the epipalaeolithic c, 10,000 BC and, following a hiatus, it was reoccupied in the Mesolithic between 7500 and 6000 BC. This is the longest recorded continuous occupation of any site in Greece by far. I removed the last sentence.
:Why? The site is known for having the longest continuous occupation of any site in Greece. According to Rutter at  occupation is continuous from 20,000 BP. Shouldn't there also be a mention of the aceramic neolithic and the Urfirnis ware found and to the tunny bones (in connection with sea travel)? --5telios 15:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Hello,
This link (university of Minesota) used as a source for almost everything is a dead link. --O Kolymbitès (talk) 16:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link
Talk:Windfall (TV series)

message: I see some tags that hint at it, but anyone know the plot/premise? --Nick Douglas 00:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the show about?

message: Anyone have a source/ref for Covina? IMDb just has Santa Clarita, California. 24.18.215.132 23:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Covina question

message: what is this show about? nothing in this page even says a single sentence about the story, plot, whateva. -24.92.43.153 13:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s an amazingly boring show about people who win the lottery.--Mathew5000 17:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ugga ugga
Talk:Frank Kimmel

message: I think the article could use a bit more information on the history of Frank's ARCA career. SimRacin40 08:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Australian Story

message: For some odd reason, the spelling of the word "program" appears to be a subject of some controversy. I direct attention to the ABC's own page on this program, where the modern spelling is used, as it is throughout the site. --Jumbo 00:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of program 

message: I deleted the section under 'Profiles' because I noticed it wasn't sourced. When I went looking for the source I found that it was completely copy and pasted word for word from https://bestinau.com.au/about-australian-story/. (AnnabelW98 (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous section entitled 'Profiles' 

message: The contributions I have made are for a University assignment. I have worked hard to gather an array of reliable sources and I hope I have significantly improved this article. If you see issues with what I have done let me know and I'll be happy to revise the work. (AnnabelW98 (talk) 12:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational Assignment
Talk:460 Weatherby Magnum

message: The pages .460 Weatherby, and .460 Weatherby Magnum are about the same cartridge, they need to be merged. Klauth 08:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This tagged has been removed due to this item being primarily a non-military related article.--Oldwildbill 12:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST
Talk:Unity of science

message: No way, Jose! The two concepts are RADICALLY different.
...
I do not know who wrote the above sentence, but could you clarify a bit? What is so radical about the dirence between the Unity of Science idea and the Unified Science idea of the Vienna circle people?
Mabelis 13:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  no way 

message: The Unified Science page seems more like a disambiguation page; if Unity of science were going to be re-labeled "unified science", the page would need to be under a slightly different name – like Unified Science (movement) or (concept) or (philosophy) or maybe just unified science in lowercase.
Either way, the Unified Science page should probably include unity of science (whatever it ends up being called) in its list of possible meanings. --Woozle 19:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Has it been shown that all the branches of science are at least non-contradictory? Entries like Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics seem to suggest that some branches of science are not, in themselves, internally consistent.  This seems to suggest that a task of assessing, say, whether quantum mechanics is mutually consistent with the branches of science that deal with physiological or ecological metabolism, would be challenging. Sholto Maud 11:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  against combining the two 

message: Some time ago a group of editors set up a "work in progress" page (at Talk:Physics/wip) to hammer out a consensus for the Physics article, which for too long had been in an unstable state. Discussion of the lead for the article has taken a great deal of time and thousands of words. The definitional and philosophical foundations seem to cause most headaches; but progress has been made. Why not review some of the proposals for the lead material that people are putting forward, or put forward your own, or simply join the discussion? The more contributors the better, for a consensus. – Noetica 01:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The review of [[Physics]] continues at [[Talk:Physics/wip]]
Talk:Dagon (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: I've added an infobox to the page using the information provided in Dragon 349, but I couldn't seem to find his portfolio in it. Does anyone know where I could find them? --Muna (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Does anyone have more reference information that we can add, specifically is it exceptable to add the origin of the D&D god? Namely Dagon is based on the Fish God of, i believe, the Philistines and was later used as a being/beings in the works of HP Lovecraft including a movie (as well worshippers wore a fish head with scale running down their front, exactly similar to the Popes hat and the cloth that drapes).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwarvenbierschneeman (talk • contribs) 12:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess more than that a simple mention of the connection is more appropriate Dwarvenbierschneeman (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be fine to have something about what the developers based the character on, but for that information to be truly useful we need a source which verifies it.  I don't know of one, but I'm not saying there isn't something out there. BOZ (talk) 12:44, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other References
Talk:23rd Fighter Group

message: Is there a 23d Fighter Wing article ?    What happened to the text of the 23d Fighter Wing ?
In 1954, HQ USAF bestowed upon each combat wing the history and honors of its similary designated World War II combat group.   
Bwmoll3 01:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honors and Lineage 

message: 23d or 23rd? See:  Bzuk (talk) 13:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this the correct spelling?

message: Does anyone have pics of the P-47N/F-47N, F-86A/F-86E F-89D/F-89H in service with the group to add to the article (or generic ones)?Lineagegeek (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: I was stationed at England AFB from 1978 to 1981. We had A7s switching to A10s. We had sharks teeth on the aircraft. There is no mention of this in this article. 2603:9001:6B00:8363:C18B:5E93:8744:5176 (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  England AFB 70s 80s
Talk:Cliff Palace

message: Anasazi architecture doesn't seem to redirect anywhere.  So, if it needs to be redirected, would this be the best choice for an article?  How about Ancient Pueblo people or Mesa Verde National Park or Chaco Canyon?  Many choices -- and we could even write a new article. Opinions?  WBardwin 00:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional architecture redirect 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.design.upenn.edu/hspv/mesaverde/site_cliffpalace.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  AFBorchert (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: srsly Dougworld99 (talk) 04:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  do people still live here? 

message: No, "Common Era" does NOT change with time.  This location has nothing to do with the birth of Jesus.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Era
Talk:Better Homes and Gardens (TV program)

message: For whatever reason, the spelling of the word "program" seems to have become an issue. I note that the program's own website uses the modern spelling. --Jumbo 00:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of program 

message: Whoever tagged this article with the "neutrality" and "multiple issues" tags hasn't had the interest/integrity to justify either of them after six months.  I'm going to be bold and remove those tags.  (I will admit that the article seems to be underreferenced and am leaving that one for now.)  68.52.120.72 (talk) 20:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagging 