lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tineidae

message: tineidae é um avestruz da famila adans  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.51.66.222 (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am removing the dead wikilinks that link to no articles.
bpage (talk) 22:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Please make sure you read and understand WP:REDLINK and WP:DEADLINK before removing links.  Reify-tech (talk) 14:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Why so many dead wikilinks?
Talk:Winter moth

message: ...based on this Portland Press Herald article:http://www.pressherald.com/news/experts-destructive-winter-moths-are-spreading_2012-12-09.html.
But I don't know how to cite it in the article itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.78.53.160 (talk) 03:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I cited it.  Thanks for providing the reference.--Brambleshire (talk) 05:42, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Did not at first believe also in Pacific northwest, but there is enough mention in mainstream media. Maybe need a ref for that? David notMD (talk) 14:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Now has ref David notMD (talk) 14:19, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added Maine to list of US states in which it is now found... 

message: An interesting and much-researched question is how egg hatch is synchronized with bud-break (the beginnings of leaf and flower bud hydration and growth). Is it number of relatively warm days? Longer sunlight per day? And for that matter, how do plants decide? For the moment, the article states that not only is hatch temperature driven, but that there is an ongoing evolutionary change to compensate for warmer spring weather, because what was happening was that majority of eggs were hatching before bud break but only the minority with genes dictating a slower response were surviving. David notMD (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egg hatch timing
Talk:Ringmer

message: Just which constituency is Ringmer in? The infobox shows Lewes, but actually points to Wealden (UK Parliament constituency). DuncanHill 12:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is Lewes, on the border of Wealden though.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.42.183.75 (talk) 15:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Parliamentary constituency

message: This article needs editing - I might get around to it once I have completed the Wealden District! - since it needs rewriting in line with  the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements. It lacks such a lot of the necessary entries/headings, and is really just a collection of disparate  statements. Nothing about the churches, school, leisure etc ... There should also be a reference list - most of the External Links should be on that. Why do we have to talk about a non-existent railway? Peter Shearan (talk) 15:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial notes
Talk:Nordsee

message: Hi !
Could anyone help me out find some more details related to the Nordsee Fish restaurants? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.76.35.219 (talk) 12:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've attempted going through the article to add some recent (and sourced) information, but there's still a lot of room for improvements. There's a lot of historic information about Nordsee in the buten un binnen article I referenced, but I simply lack the experience in writing beautifully worded articles to transfer all this information, and it would end up looking like a list. --Safto Rangen (talk) 08:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 and historic information
Talk:Porter Caves

message: I'm not sure if the Porter Caves are a notable enough feature to demand their own article. At least not without a great deal of improvement on the current article. It does seem like it would fit very well in the Geology section of the University of California, Santa Cruz article. It also seems like Porter Caves should be listed by the name Empire Cave. Any thoughts or suggestions?
Benwildeboer 12:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of Porter Caves into [[University of California, Santa Cruz]]
Talk:The Houses of Iszm

message: >Ailie Farr, is a human botanist who goes to Iszm (like many others before him, of many species) to steal a female tree
He had no such intentions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.34.89.211 (talk) 23:55, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you might be right. How should we reword that sentence?--Narayan (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: have you read the book?

message: This might be interesting to add someday. Especially cause of this sentence: What was the inspiration for your concept? I was inspired by the home-trees from a book by science fiction writer Jack Vance “The Houses of Izm” 1954. --Narayan (talk) 12:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  might be interesting
Talk:Sultan Qaboos University

message: Hugh Mason (talk • contribs 03:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

message: The article says the university is located in Muscat, but the geographic coordinates given point to Seeb. Please correct either one or the other! Is it now located in Seeb or in Muscat city?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.76.204.129 (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:2006 Auburn Tigers football team

message: Anyone want to insert a write-up on the SC game? Earthsound 18:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Carolina game 
Talk:Robert Pete Williams

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/robert-pete-williams-mn0000236646/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Order

message: I've been editing Wikipedia articles almost daily since the fall of 2002.  I've done more than an eight of a million edits, NONE assisted by bots or the like.  Among edits appearing to be in good faith, the worst I've ever seen are this and 
this.
: 
First this long disambiguation page was moved to a title identifying a different topic.  Then all of the content was deleted and replaced by a short and colossally silly article.  (I reverted and then moved it back.) Michael Hardy (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now if you are going to accuse poor Jerzy of making the worst edit ever you really ought to start a page where comparisons can be made.  My nomination would be this from the Oscilloscope article, and a barnstar goes to the first person who gives me (with proof) the transpose of the matrix of buckets.  On second thoughts perhaps we should just be civil to those editors less fortunate than the great Michael Hardy. SpinningSpark 17:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst edits ever 

message: I've deleted the "cleanup" tag, but definitely this article has deficiencies.  Maybe I'll be back soon. Michael Hardy (talk) 12:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements needed 

message: Am I missing it in the list, or is there no article that describes "order" as used to mean "organization" (as opposed to chaos)?  This is a common form of the word - one used in several Wikipedia articles, including entropy.  98.204.140.83 (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The concept of, and article for cosmos partly addresses this meaning. It was apparently coined as the antithesis for chaos, or the other way round. Kept it as a subtitle nevertheless, as I feel inclined to agree that the article suggested, has not have been written yet. JMK (talk) 22:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

text: The term randomness was deleted, as the Entropy article does not draw a direct link between entropy and randomness; the latter is merely included under "See also". Furthermore the lack of articles for "Order" and "Disorder" (both disamb pages) in Science may well be justified, as "Entropy" as a measurement encompasses both, in the same way that "Temperature" encompasses both warmth and cold. There happens to be an article for Cold, which actually does little more than list different instances and extremes of it. While the article for warmth actually links to Heat, which is rather the transfer of warmth or cold, than one of them. JMK (talk) 08:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Order as antonym of entropy?

message: This item was added by myself, but evaluating it again, I tend to agree that it may well be left out of the list. Was deleted. JMK (talk) 22:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Elliot wave, dubious tag

message: The topic and usage of  is under discussion, see Talk:Military order (monastic society) -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Military order
Talk:Catti-brie

message: I added the paragraph from the page on her bow to this. Seems silly to have a whole different page SunSmith (talk) 05:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Weapon

message: Her name is spelled Catti-brie.  I looked through several of the books, including the original, and at no time is it spelled Cattie-brie.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Juusu (talk • contribs) 08:32, 25 October 2006
:I was about to ask the same question myself.  :)   Stats page from Wizards of the Coast Theredcomet2000 09:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also Cattie-brie in many D&D manuals and in the WotC website  . I think that the best is: Catti-brie (also Cattie-brie in some...) is... -- Trixt 19:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the page to the correct spelling. —Lowellian (reply) 07:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of name

message: From my recollection (I have the Icewind Dale Trilogy somewhere), isn't the proper spelling "Mithril Hall"?  This article lists and links to "Mithral Hall" instead, which I believe to be incorrect.  The Icewind Dale Trilogy page also has the spelling as "Mithril" in the plot summary.  I didn't want to change anything without discussion first; thank you for your consideration.  Vendetta 13:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of the Hall
Talk:Salutation

message: The current article text contains:
"Sa'adat Assayid if the reader is male, and Sa'adat As'Sayyidah  if female."
and:
"Sa'adat Assayidah Sarah Ibrahim"
Two inconsistencies are:
* Assayid vs As'Sayyidah
* As'Sayyidah vs Assayyidah
From the transliterations of texts in Arabic that I have seen until now, I understand that one standard would transliterate the formulas as follows:
"Saʻādat as-sayyid if the reader is male, and Saʻādat as-sayyidah if she is female."
Similar considerations hold for the other transliterations from Arabic. I am not knowledgeable enough to check whether the Arabic translations are correct, but I propose that a standard transliteration be used and in a consistent way.Redav (talk) 01:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent transliteration 

message: Salutations in languages other than English should not be included in this article. I seek a new consensus to remove them.  Riposte97 (talk) 12:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation dictionary?
Talk:Mors Kochanski

message: When we say " one of the world's best " it is good to have a source, and possibly more. I also think that if he is so famous, then maybe we can add an External Link to a page with more information about him, please.  - Pernambuco 13:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This source has it listed as October 11th. Facebook has a photo of him and a birthday cake, posted October 12th.
I think perhaps the listed date of November 10th is incorrect. 173.120.183.216 (talk) 01:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  questions on his date of birth?
Talk:Post's theorem

message: The article has been sitting in a half-finished state for a while.  I expanded it and set it up for further improvement.
*This article needs to be at an undergraduate level at the highest
*More references, especially at the undergrad level, are needed
*The notation should be kept as simple as possible (but not more simple than that).  
*I think that a proof would be nice, and the proof is elementary anyway.
*More corollaries would be good.
CMummert 13:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 2006-10-25 

message: I believe the 'alternative' definition I added using quantifier blocks and bounded quantifiers should probably be the primary definition.  However, I don't remember and need to get back to working on my thesis.Logicnazi (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantifier Blocks 

message: The definition of  \Sigma^{0}_m differs from the traditional one for m=0 since it would not allow bounded quantifiers. Since Post theorem doesn't say anything about \Sigma^0_0 relation this doesn't affect the theorem, but it seems misleading. Catrincm (talk) 13:34, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of <math>\Sigma^{0}_m</math> 

message: What does it mean: "at most if and only if"? Is it equivalence or one-direction consequence?
Eugepros (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  T halts on input n at time n<sub>1</sub> at most if and only if <math>\varphi(n,n_1)</math> is satisfied
Talk:Interstate 95 in New York

message: I see there was a merge proposal that failed ten years ago. Because both articles are on the short side, I think the main NY I-95 article could handle the additional content from the Trans-Manhattan Expressway article. The main article is only 35 kb, including all refs and tables. The Trans-Manhattan Expressway article is only 12 kb, which includes some redundant information to the main article. If the content on the Trans-Manhattan Expressway ends up overwhelming the article in the future, then it could be split back off, but I'm not convinced that there's so much information that the main article couldn't handle integrating the four paragraphs. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  03:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: from me on that! Imzadi 1979 →  04:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Trans-Manhattan Expressway]]?
Talk:Critical Nuclear Weapon Design Information

message: http://www.dss.mil/isec/nispom.htm returns a 404 error.
Basesurge (talk) 10:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead Link

message: The sentence "The sensitivity of DoD CNWDI is such that access is granted to the absolute minimum number of employees who require it for the accomplishment of assigned responsibilities on a classified contract." is irrelevant, because it is applicable to all classified information, and all export controlled information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.156.214.171 (talk) 05:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant information
Talk:Stephen B. Elkins

message: Regarding the move of this page, Stephen B. Elkins (70%), S. B. Elkins (17%), and Stephen Elkins (15%) are the only iterations of Elkins's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com. Star Garnet (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Ikkō Narahara

message: The proper tag for this article should the   tag rather than the stub tags on it currently. --- Skapur 16:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub versus expand

message: This article had long lists of exhibitions and awards, not one of which was sourced. I've therefore removed the whole lot. Many -- or most, or perhaps all -- of the assertions are probably correct. IFF disinterested, reliable sourcing can be found for any assertion, it can be readded. -- Hoary (talk) 02:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: awards, exhibitions
Talk:John E. Kenna

message: How could "Kenna was born near St. Albans, West Virginia" in 1848 when West Virginia did not become a state until 1861?  it seems to me that he must have been born in Virginia?  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was he born?
Talk:Jack Sharkey

message: "In 1928 Sharkey defeated heavyweight contender Tom Heeney..."  Is that accurate?  A diary from that date says this fight was ruled a draw, and records at http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=13554&cat=boxer seem to confirm that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.60.230.113 (talk) 14:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Sharkey win?
Talk:Delta robot

message: I removed the statement "plus thomas licks balls" from the article. That must have been vandalism, right? - Pernambuco 13:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: wouldn't it need to have a reference (or perhaps examples) for the line about the possibility of this type of robot being used as haptic joystick and/or game controller?--TiagoTiago 02:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. A mention of the Novint Falcon has now been added  Roidroid (talk) 12:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  game controlers? 

message: this page should be merged wit Parallel manipulator
Batsu (talk) 20:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Best discussed at Talk:Parallel manipulator Andy Dingley (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Francis Rossi

message: Please see the discussion at Talk:Status Quo (band)#"Boogie-woogie rock"? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 00:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Boogie-woogie rock"?? 

message: There is reference to family here, and "Gurnon". Perhaps an earlier section listing wives and children would clarify this section, as it is confusing in it's current state. Naming "Gurnon" with no name or relationship mentioned earlier, it reads like something earlier in the article has been removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeholden (talk • contribs) 05:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Life section 
Talk:William Laird III

message: See Talk:William Laird IV#Requested move 29 September 2017. Andrewa (talk) 01:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Result
Talk:Tom Novy

message: See the other article, Eniac (record producer) which is about the same person. Merge the two. - Pernambuco 13:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you actually forgot to read the article. Especially the part with their very different real names? Such as one is called Thomas Reichold and the other Robert Borrmann? >sigh!< --Pc13 17:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of effors, merge needed 
Talk:DMC Mining Services

message: Removed PROD.  Company is listed on a major stock exchange, so passes WP:CORP QuiteUnusual 14:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply being listed on an exchange isn't sufficient, according to WP:CORP. The criteria is that the company's stock is used to calculate the index. Mindmatrix 18:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ahmed Aboutaleb

message: THe PvdA IS taking part in the government. So the last part of the article must be rewritten. 145.58.16.64 19:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PvdA

message: I have heard, that the Dutch rightwing leader Geert Wilders was against Ahmed Aboutaleb, because he is a Muslim. Is that true? -- Arne List 18:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still against him, muslim issue cannot be proven, but likely plays an important roe, officially Wilders is against beceause of mr Aboutaleb dual nationalities (Dutch and Morroccan).  Arnoutf 19:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-Muslim sentiments

message: What does this erroneous heading have to do in an encyclopedic article? Vandalism needs to be taken care of here. BigMac 19:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Section had been removed.  Aside from your concern it also was not sourced. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Career Problems?

message: Why was "Wat Wouter wil" translated as "What a voter wants", when - at least word for word - a translation would be "What Wouter wants"? Or does anyone know for a fact that the allusion to "a voter" was actually meant?
I could not look up the original Dutch text for "important first that the PvdA wins the elections." As a Dutchman I suspect that the Dutch expression by Mr. Aboutaleb might have been along the lines of "Het is belangrijk dat de PvdA eerst de verkiezingen wint", and that a better translation might be "(it is) important that the PvdA win the elections first." Note the subjunctive for "win" and the position of "first".
Any objections?Redav (talk) 15:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Translations
Talk:Megalithic architectural elements

message: If people want to split these back up into articles I think we should go for Kerb (archaeology) or Peristalith and avoid the confusion we had over that. also because the word feature is used as a hard and soft term in archaeology any subsequent categorization should avoid the use of the word feature in its title I am in the process of tracing back most of the links to check for errors in the merge. very new to this so i hope I have not made any serious errors. Boris 14:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merger of megalithic terms and confusion with kerb
Talk:National Quartet Convention

message: "NQC" should redirect here. 66.19.229.105 14:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. Right now it goes to a programming language called "Not Quite C," notable in its own right. I'll ask on that talk page about moving it in favor of a disambiguation page. Acdixon 14:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For anyone still keeping track, NQC is now a disambiguation page that includes this article. Acdixon 14:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NQC

message: According to this Wikipedia page, the NQC started in 1957. However, an organization with the same name was founded in Chicago in 1947 or 1948. 
Another solid cite on the creation of the Chicago NGC: Marovich's A City Called Heaven
The Chicago NQC existed at least until 1955..
The relationship between the two should be clarified, but the existence of the first should definitely be documented. The Chicago NQC was founded by members of the influential gospel groups, the Soul Stirrers, and the Famous Blue Jays, and it was part of the development of notable musicians such as Sam Cooke and Lou Rawls.
Followup research: the "southern gospel music" (SGM, aka White) NGC may have been founded in 1950, according to Desnoyers-Colas & Howard
. Since I'm still picking this stuff up piecemeal, I'm not going to edit the main article yet.
--JoeGermuska (talk) 23:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about origin. 

message: Why is all of the information in this article unsubstantiated? Assertions like "The week is largely attended by the older generation but lately due to the popularity of groups such as the Booth Brothers, Signature Sound, Legacy Five, The Collingsworth Family and the Gaither Vocal Band, the fans are becoming younger" are completely uncredited to any source. What gives?
99.97.90.206 (talk) 20:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Citations