Talk:2006 Atlantic hurricane season/July

message: Everything gone. Now pretty quiet in the Atlantic. How long can it last? (although I don't see anything like last July which was more like September) CrazyC83 16:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we'll get Beryl the end of second week (around the 12th to 15th) -24.195.163.207 20:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Reuters picked up a TWO with a possible development in it and made a story out of it, hence the reference on current events. There's nothing unusual about a TWO with possible development mentioned, its unusual that Reuters made a story of it though. Perhaps the media are about as bad as us lot?--Nilfanion (talk) 18:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

text: LOL, don't worry. That's just the media machine. They're overhyping the disturbance east of Florida way too much. The NHC never said a storm was forming, or that a tropical depression was imminent. All they said was that conditions could become more favorable. --Hurricanehink (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Week 1

message: ::Ooo, stalled out frontal boundary in the Gulf. This could become interesting. →Cyclone1→ 03:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's kinda nice actually... Now I can actually pay attention to the West Pacific for once. For those that don't know, Korea is about to get screwed by Typhoon/TS Ewiniar in about 24 hours. -Winter123 06:35, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Cape Verde beginning early? Is the 1996 all over again? CrazyC83 20:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be interesting if this happened again. Ironically, it would be the "B" storm as well. -Winter123 00:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Gulf Coast wouldn't mind that, but the East Coast, plus the Caribbean, would loathe it...considering what followed later. CrazyC83 01:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: It's a nice looking tropical wave. -- WmE 10:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs to move north and west though. I can't see it developing before it reaches the Caribbean. Once there, shear needs to subside (it is enormous right now). CrazyC83 15:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. Storms this early in the season don't usually form that far east (Emily being a major exception). It might get going once past the Windward Islands, like Charley or Dennis. Pobbie Rarr 15:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An even greater exception was 1996's Bertha...and took the northern route too (which was unprecedented for July). If shear subsides, look out! If it doesn't, this will never organize. CrazyC83 16:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, if shear lessens, this wave needs to be watched closely, but if the shear persists, and I think so, this invest will be history soon. -- WmE 16:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Here's the sheer outlook.  What do you guys think? →Cyclone1→ 12:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What GFS? I can't find it. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 12:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess winter was referring to  that -- WmE 15:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

text: But what is left of it looks organized. I'll give this a 70% chance of developing somewhere sometime in the future. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 13:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, it's a fighter! Convection is increasing and the NHC seems to be more interested in it. -- WmE 15:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, this thing looks better organised than many a tropical storm. Looks like Barbados is in for a soaking. Let's just wait and see what happens as it churns ever westward... Pobbie Rarr 15:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: ...and now it looks doomed once more. Pobbie Rarr 21:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: THe only part that could conceivebly develop is the extreme southern part. loop -Winter123 05:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

text: That could be really bad news for that region, especially with the trends pointing to high activity up there. CrazyC83 03:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Week 2

message: I noticed  this wave today. (You can hit "Animate" at the top) Amazingly, it looks like it has a surface low already. Here's NHC's take:
"TROPICAL WAVE IS ALONG 33W S OF 13N MOVING W 15-20 KT. LOW 
AMPLITUDE WAVE WITH IMPROVING CURVATURE IS OBSERVED ON VISIBLE 
SATELLITE IMAGERY. CONVECTION IS SPREADING S OF THE ITCZ DUE TO 
THE WAVE WITH ISOLATED MODERATE CONVECTION FROM 3N-6N BETWEEN 
28W-36W."
This may need to be watched, because  the GFS brings it north of the islands and generally towards the east coast. (it shows up near PR on the 13th) -Winter123 19:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cape Verde beginning early? Is the 1996 all over again? CrazyC83 20:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be interesting if this happened again. Ironically, it would be the "B" storm as well. -Winter123 00:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Gulf Coast wouldn't mind that, but the East Coast, plus the Caribbean, would loathe it...considering what followed later. CrazyC83 01:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: It's a nice looking tropical wave. -- WmE 10:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs to move north and west though. I can't see it developing before it reaches the Caribbean. Once there, shear needs to subside (it is enormous right now). CrazyC83 15:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. Storms this early in the season don't usually form that far east (Emily being a major exception). It might get going once past the Windward Islands, like Charley or Dennis. Pobbie Rarr 15:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An even greater exception was 1996's Bertha...and took the northern route too (which was unprecedented for July). If shear subsides, look out! If it doesn't, this will never organize. CrazyC83 16:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, if shear lessens, this wave needs to be watched closely, but if the shear persists, and I think so, this invest will be history soon. -- WmE 16:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Here's the sheer outlook.  What do you guys think? →Cyclone1→ 12:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What GFS? I can't find it. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 12:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess winter was referring to  that -- WmE 15:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

text: But what is left of it looks organized. I'll give this a 70% chance of developing somewhere sometime in the future. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 13:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, it's a fighter! Convection is increasing and the NHC seems to be more interested in it. -- WmE 15:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, this thing looks better organised than many a tropical storm. Looks like Barbados is in for a soaking. Let's just wait and see what happens as it churns ever westward... Pobbie Rarr 15:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: ...and now it looks doomed once more. Pobbie Rarr 21:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: THe only part that could conceivebly develop is the extreme southern part. loop -Winter123 05:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  96L.INVEST 

message: new invest in the atlantic...  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.177.165.74 (talk • contribs) .
:It's a nice looking tropical wave. -- WmE 10:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs to move north and west though. I can't see it developing before it reaches the Caribbean. Once there, shear needs to subside (it is enormous right now). CrazyC83 15:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Storms this early in the season don't usually form that far east (Emily being a major exception). It might get going once past the Windward Islands, like Charley or Dennis. Pobbie Rarr 15:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An even greater exception was 1996's Bertha...and took the northern route too (which was unprecedented for July). If shear subsides, look out! If it doesn't, this will never organize. CrazyC83 16:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, if shear lessens, this wave needs to be watched closely, but if the shear persists, and I think so, this invest will be history soon. -- WmE 16:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Here's the sheer outlook.  What do you guys think? →Cyclone1→ 12:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What GFS? I can't find it. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 12:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess winter was referring to  that -- WmE 15:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

text: But what is left of it looks organized. I'll give this a 70% chance of developing somewhere sometime in the future. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 13:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, it's a fighter! Convection is increasing and the NHC seems to be more interested in it. -- WmE 15:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, this thing looks better organised than many a tropical storm. Looks like Barbados is in for a soaking. Let's just wait and see what happens as it churns ever westward... Pobbie Rarr 15:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: ...and now it looks doomed once more. Pobbie Rarr 21:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: THe only part that could conceivebly develop is the extreme southern part. loop -Winter123 05:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 96L.INVEST

message: The Canadian Hurricane Centre has issued a press release about the warm waters off the coast of Atlantic Canada.  See [here].  I couldn't find an official statement on their website though. Blacknail 16:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That could be really bad news for that region, especially with the trends pointing to high activity up there. CrazyC83 03:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Hurricane Centre Press Release 

message: ====91L.INVEST (error)====
91L has just appeared, no imagery yet. What happened to 97L, 98L, 99L, and 90L? -- RattleMan 07:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As invest-happy as NRL's been lately, they probably lasted a few seconds each. ;) All kidding aside, this is probably a numbering error (the last invest in the EPAC was 90E, and 91E appeared a little earlier). Yep, looks like an error, because 91L and 91E have the exact same set of satellite imagery. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 07:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, it's off NRL now. -- RattleMan 07:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Week 3

message: 91L has just appeared, no imagery yet. What happened to 97L, 98L, 99L, and 90L? -- RattleMan 07:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As invest-happy as NRL's been lately, they probably lasted a few seconds each. ;) All kidding aside, this is probably a numbering error (the last invest in the EPAC was 90E, and 91E appeared a little earlier). Yep, looks like an error, because 91L and 91E have the exact same set of satellite imagery. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 07:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, it's off NRL now. -- RattleMan 07:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 91L.INVEST (error)