Talk:Logo TV

message: Why is "First Comes Love" listed twice on this page - and a section called "Other programming new to U.S. audiences"?tdempsey 02:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing questions 

message: "How will they express their love for each other? Find out on First Comes Love.", "Only on LOGO!", etc. :: Supergolden 15:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to clean it up; do we think the ad tag can be removed?Otto4711 10:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement tag 

message: I'm just wondering which is the more official usage, capitalized or not? --Revolución (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be Logo, rather than LOGO, according to their official site, most of the body text uses title case rather than all upper case. Aep 05:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo or LOGO? 

message: I'm glad to see this entry but think that the descriptions of the shows on this network are in a style more appropriate for advertising the shows than for reporting on them. Interlingua 05:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reporting or Advertising 

message: Are these at all helpful or useful? Every time I look at this page these lists strike me as being more and more of a waste of space. Otto4711 14:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming lists 

message: At the bottom I think there are way too many headers with only the few sentences that can fill them. It seems more like an ad trying to sell the channel by pointing out interestinf features than a Wikipedia article. --OGoncho 08:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Headers

message: Logo doesn't appear on any one channel globally throughout its' services. Logo is channel 247 on Time Warner Cable Nebraska (Lincoln), but  146 on Time Warner Cable Southern California. I typed 68502 and 90210 has my references into tv.yahoo.com to get these results.
Meojive 02:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo via Time Warner Cable 

message: What is the Source for logo being on dishnetwork sometime in 2007? Makhay 15:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo on Dish Network 

message: The image :Image:CBS news logo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:CBS news logo.jpg

message: I have been viewing BNN channel 504 on Bell Satellite for 5 months now since I am a new online stock trader and find there channel very informative concerning online trading. I was horrified this weekend while viewing a DVD movie that my HDTV set has the entire BNN LOGO burnt into my screen. I would like to have my TV replaced since this is absolutely BNN'S fault. They should have a warning disclaimer on your screen or rotate this STATIC logo as to prevent this from happening again to some other unaware viewer. Is there anybody that can assist me in my quest for justice since BNN [Business News Network]has refused to take any responsibility for having ruined by HDTV. I need help to fight uncaring Goliath.   142.162.54.227 (talk) 16:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, this isn't the place to post whatever it is you just posted, but if you have a plasma HDTV, then yes, it will have burn in. LCDs do too, but not as easily. For an LCD to get burn-in, you have to have the image on the screen for maybe 1000 hours or more total, while with a plasma screen it only takes a few hours. CRT has the same principles as LCD for burn-in. Also if you are using a plasma, try using the whitewash method of screen cleaning, and then enable the orbiter mode. If you continue to have burn-in, keep whitewashing the screen. You can also whitewash the screen overnight when not using the HDTV, as the color white doesn't harm the plasma, no depleats it, as plasma screens depleat of black gas. Coffee4binky (talk) 09:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BNN channel 504 on Bell Satellite  BNN LOGO burnt into my screen !!!! 

message: As of late 2016 the channel carried no LGBT programming. It only carries American sit-com reruns from the 1950s to 1980s. Therefore, there should be no categorization as such. Dogru144 (talk) 09:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Then become a Viacom shareholder, become a board member and get into the executive office so you can declare as such. This isn't going to happen; they carry enough programming to qualify and until they put out a press release saying they're a rerun network, it isn't going to happen. Note that in the past we've considered stuff like this vandalism (especially with LGBTQ+ issues), so just don't do it. Nate • (chatter) 21:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Was trying to figure out how reruns of Green Acres fit a LGBT agenda....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.90.64 (talk) 10:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing LGBT categorization

message: Contrary to the edits of User:Mrschimpf aka 'Nate,' all of the station's programming is retro/classic, and therefore belongs in .Dogru144 (talk) 02:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: They have new and original programming and do not market in that way; the categorization is inappropriate. Nate • (chatter) 02:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Classic TV programming

message: I can see why the channel page is still at Logo TV (as in seeing the exact reason why, but I disagree with the outcome) while the list of programs broadcast page just calls it Logo? If it was good enough for the List of programs broadcast page why isn’t it good enough for the channel page? Shouldn’t Comlon Name policy kick in?
Addendum: Bravo’s web domain is Bravotv.com but the channel’s Wikipedia page is Bravo (U.S. TV network). Considering such was used in previous discussions as part of the argument I feel it should be refuted--Sarcathmo17 (talk) 03:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 

message: Is Logo even a functioning entity anymore, or has it become a Zombie network? Programming seems like they have given up and programming nothing but single programming for hours on end. Given the dysfunction of cable networks under Paramount’s control, Wikipedia needs a new categorization for these types of “channels” that just take up space on cable services. ClevelandExPat (talk) 23:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this now a Zombie Network