Talk:Baháʼís Under the Provisions of the Covenant

message: Cunado, instead of trying to tear me down on administrator's talk pages, and attempting to portray yourself as some sort of policy protecting victim, why don't you spend that time and energy contributing ideas that involve creative ways we can improve these articles through these discussions? I personally have come to view your contributions to these articles in the last 3 years to have crossed the line of your original well intentioned pursuits of applying NPOV, and have devolved to focusing on marginalizing this group by mercilessly leveraging policy against every single sentence. Now, I'm just holding your contributions to the very standards that you have established here, and am addressing you in a manner in which I've become accustomed. I edit on dozens of pages, and I have never witnessed any of them being held under a microscope like this one has. These bupc pages have been combed over again and again, and have endured an endless array of badgering assaults all under the banner of policy. For 3+ solid years you've been here almost daily "applying policy" to remove beliefs and historical events, so you've established the precedent here about how editing on this page will be conducted. Now that strict adherence to policy is working against you, you're acting like I'm the one being unreasonable. Unlike on every other page I've edited (which is close to 100 by now), any and all semblance of reason and co-operation has been taken of the table of considerations here, and we're left with strict adherence to policy. You created this atmosphere here; it works both way. Look at what you object to these days. Us referencing our beliefs back to our websites? This is acceptable per selfpub, yet you won't allow any of it, and if I want to insist I have to wage an edit war to include content that by every account warrants inclusion. So if you don't like me being completely unresponsive to your concerns, and playing by the rules you've established, maybe you should consider lightening up in the future when it comes to editing here. In the mean time, it's just too darned bad if you don't like the fact that you have no grounds for removing anything referenced to Hyslop. Repeating your same tired objections won't change the policy protecting the content. Regards. DisarrayGeneral 06:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When I started editing these pages they were promotional pieces that were entirely unacceptable. You have consistently shown a bias on these articles with an extreme WP:Conflict of Interest. My interest has focused on NPOV and removing propaganda and adding third party verifiable, reliable references that you have consistently reverted. Anyone reading the talk and edit history will immediately see that and I'll stand behind it. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 15:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More on 2009-02-24 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bahá'ís Under the Provisions of the Covenant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090402023824/http://fnweb1.isd.doa.state.mt.us/idmws/custom/sll/sll_fn_home.htm to http://fnweb1.isd.doa.state.mt.us/idmws/custom/SLL/SLL_FN_home.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified