lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Synertek

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Damien Synertek. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 4#Damien Synertek until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  T*U (talk) 05:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Damien Synertek" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The EPA and CDC refs are slightly confusing about the location of Synertek's fab, both calling it "Coronado Bvd." or "Coronado Dr." in each of their reports. The current address is Coronado Drive, but the street may have been renamed slightly at some point. Confirming this with the map in the CDC document is (literally) rather disorienting, as the map there has to be rotated 90 degrees clockwise so its north is up. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 14:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the location
Talk:Symbios Logic

message: A nice history of Symbios Logic's Wichita facility is at User:Aldenrw/NCR E&M Wichita, and there is a current picture of it (as a NetApp facility) at commons:File:Wichita Kansas NetApp 2013.JPG.
--Ppelleti (talk) 02:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wichita Facility
Talk:Sylvania Electric Products

message: Whence the name "Sylvania"? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 20:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:SX2 Media Labs

message: Where did that part come from? Computer Shopper was never published by Ziff Davis, it was published by CNET. Is that what it's supposed to be? I'll change it if there are no objections.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cs92 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ziff Davis?
Talk:Swizzels

message: I heard a story, and I have no idea how true it is, that the founders were originally German immigrants fleeing Anti-Semitism in Germany. Does anyone have any information confirming or denying this. -- 26th of october 2014  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nomadicsyndicalist (talk • contribs) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  role of anti-Semitism 

message: Refreshers redirects here. I still don't know what they are. -- megA (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect? 

message: * https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/tv/inside-swizzels-factory-love-home-18722324
* https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/business-news/swizzels-factory-features-bbc-twos-11788000
* https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07qr278 which is here
* https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/uk/food/a577836/swizzels-sweet-design-competition/
* https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/uk/food/a35489203/love-hearts-biscuits-swizzels/
* https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ATOkPGmykfcC&pg=PA78&dq=%22Swizzels%22+-inpublisher:icon&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0#v=onepage&q=%22Swizzels%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&f=false
— Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 12:14, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: "Fizzers are rolled-up tablet candies that fizz and dissolve when put into soda."
This is an English product, manufactured in England & mainly sold in Britain, so could someone please provide an English translation of this sentence as, as it stands, it makes no sense.
(In Britain tablet is a firmer version of fudge, mainly made in Scotland & soda is just carbonated water, which fizzes quite well on it's own. Also, I'm sure the sweets are pressed, not 'rolled-up'.)
:I agree with most of this, but not with the tablet part. I think the word "tablet" is an appropriate description. I'll get round to this later hopefully. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 06:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Switch and Data

message: I see my mentor has started work on a wiki project that was discussed in another life...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.99.139 (talk) 02:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article has not been fully updated to reflect it is now defunct after being acquired in 2010. Green Cardamom (talk) 16:58, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated tag
Talk:Swiss Cheese Union

message: Is Sepp Barmettler really so important that the entirety of the rebellion section should be devoted to him? Particularly without a source, it seems strange.
Ideally, other people who also opposed the Swiss Cheese Union could be found and mentioned more in summary. No1ofInterest (talk) 18:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebellion Section
Talk:JBS USA

message: Swift and Armour were the two giants in the historic American meatpacking industry.  The article on Armour is comprehensive; this article tells nothing about the history of Swift or its development, prior to very recent times.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.199.88.163 (talk) 19:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A totally inadequate article

message: "On Sunday, May 30, JBS USA determined that it was the target of an organized cybersecurity attack" per https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/05/31/2239049/0/en/Media-Statement-JBS-USA-Cybersecurity-Attack.html – this article should be updated to reflect this. RCyber (talk) 01:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 cyberattack 

message: Compared to the rest of this article, these sections feel very out of place, most of all because they're not as notable. (Why do I care that senior notes were due on New Year's Day 2010?  Why do we need to know the address of JBS's headquarters?) Most suspect of all is that the IPO section was added by Magnovvig, a known sockpuppeteer. I was warned when I tried to revert their edit (maybe because I gave the impression I was a sockpuppet?), so I've come to ask what you all think. 2607:FEA8:3BA0:4220:B5:7C44:F9A8:AA3A (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 tender offer and 2009 failed IPO
Talk:Prince Henry's Grammar School, Otley

message: Similar article Prince Henry's Grammar School has been merged in with this one, and the page redirected here. Scribble Monkey 15:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Swedish firesteel

message: Consider merging this into Ferrocerium. --Mdwyer (talk) 06:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: At http://flickr.com/photos/avarab/2496458252/ --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 07:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that the current article content is factually correct without being promotional.  I will add a note that the product is manufactured by the "Light My Fire" company, but the rest of the changes suggested by Lmfspork can only be considered as promotional.  If the image is correct, I invite Lmfspork to upload a correct image to WikiMedia commons which can be used in its place.  Please note that any copyright claims on the uploaded image must be released so that the image can be freely copied and used at Wikipedia. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Yes, that is the nature of the CC-BY-SA license under which Wikipedia operates.  However, as one final note, if the image you upload is copyrighted, you will need to inform the Wikimedia Foundation that you are releasing the rights.  Merely uploading the file to Wikipedia is not sufficient, as I could go to your website, steal the images and upload them, which would be a copyright violation.  Instead, you should follow the directions outlined at WP:Donating copyrighted materials. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free image
Talk:SWEB Energy

message: The SWEB area is now operated by Hong Kong's CK Hutchison Holdings' Western Power Distribution.
– Western Power Distribution is owned by PPL
30 June 2010 - EDF Energy sells to PPL who re-brand to Western Power Distribution
– EDF Energy is still the incumbent retail supplier. I can find no reference to an event of this nature in 2010.
Grahamj42 (talk) 19:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statements removed from article
Talk:Swanndri

message: Note, the Buy NZ Made page makes it clear that the government "Buy Kiwi Made" program only existed 2005-2009 at most. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snori (talk • contribs) 21:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Kiwi made" issue

message: The long tail on the back of the Swanny is to keep your kidneys warm & dry while shearing sheep, which requires a lot of bending over at the waist out in the shearing shed, right? This is not a fashion thing, it is practicality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.108.241.243 (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2016
Talk:Indigetes

message: Although I am happy to help editing this page I object that it be under the banner of "Spain" since this region is clearly in Catalonia, and the Indigetes themselves having no relation whatsoever with the modern state are in my view very inappropriately linked to the Spanish state here. --Kurogawa 13:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The banner is not a signal of property. It just means that this article is of interess for the wikipedians interested in stuff thay may relate to Spain (as this article does). Others banners can be added. Fell free to do so. Cheers! The Ogre (talk) 19:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Banner

message: I have some information about Castell Fosca (currently in red) and a photograph. Where should I put them? Moltesvoltes (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Create a new article! Be bold! Just click on the red link. Cheers! The Ogre (talk) 19:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Castell Fosca 
Talk:Suunto

message: I've semi-protected this page for now because my attempts to clean up the spam in this article was reverted without discussion and with incivility (which I'm less bothered about), by an unregistered account which has presumably been editing on behalf of the company. Reverting edits using the Refill tool, which just formats references, seems to be deliberate vandalism. The whole article and a swathe of similar promotional articles related to the company seem to have been created by editors acting directly or indirectly on its behalf without declaring an interest, which is a breach of our terms and conditions and can result in a block. I will also block any registered account that restores deleted spam without discussion, or which I think is a sock puppet of a COI editor.
The company is clearly notable, which is why it's still there, but spam and unsourced "facts" are not acceptable. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The trivia sections: "Suunto in the media" and "Suunto in the movies" are unencyclopaedic and effectively just PR for Suunto. They provide no value to the reader.
I propose deleting them in their entirety as spam. I will assume consensus and do this at the end of June if there are no logical and plausible arguments against this proposal before then. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections, so will delete. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 10:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia sections are basically advertising 
Talk:Supra Corporation

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Non-contested move   (t · c) buidhe 04:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Supra, Inc. →  – InfoWorld calls it "Supra Corp.", Amigareport calls it "Supra Corporation" or just "Supra", Antic calls it just "Supra", Telecompaper calls it just "Supra", CBROnline/New Statesman calls it "Supra Corp". Nobody calls it "Supra, Inc.". — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 03:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 May 2021
Talk:MG ZR

message: There is a conflict of tense running throughout the article that needs addressing. --Timetrial 15:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Tense 

message: There was a 2.0l diesel but I don't know what Powertrain series it was to list in the box - anyone any ideas? --89.101.141.253 (talk) 14:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  diesel omitted... 
Talk:Superior Coach Company

message: I've seen an old ad (in The American City journal) for Garford which gives Lima as their home base, i.e. before the name change to "Superior".  [  
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=231512651945868&set=gm.2895808564065457] Tmangray (talk) 02:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Garford in Lima before name change

message: It’s still based in Lima, OH. My professional car is a 99’ Superior, and they are still manufacturing to this day. :) 
https://ss-superior.com/
https://superiorcoaches.com/#:~:text=In%20Lima%2C%20Ohio%2C%20our%20passionate,honors%20the%20legacy%20we%CA%BCve%20built. 70.62.16.131 (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superior Coach Company
Talk:Sunsilk

message: I agree with the flag that sections of this article read like blatant PR. And I used to work on the product! Somebody such urgently clean this up. Have just done certain parts myself. BuzzWoof (talk) 10:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: This viral campaign never gained or caused any popularity. If it was widely linked, it's because it was widely spammed. Everyone whoever tried to manage a wiki or blog should know what I'm talking about. This Sunsilk movie was even spammed on several P2P networks. I can only say I'd never buy any of their products in a billion years and if the industry doesn't learn to behave and treat its costumers with respect, the whole industry along with anti-human capitalism will be history real quick. --16:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular vs. Spamming
Talk:Sunset Records

message: Interesting that the label stopped operations in the US in 1970; this was when it began to appear (Liberty subsidiary, same logo as in US) in the UK. Don't know when it stopped in the UK, but it was used for reissuing back-catalogue material and certainly issued records by Captain Beefheart, Hawkwind and the Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band. BTLizard (talk) 10:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1970 

message: * - possible RS
*
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:35, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources from which to work
Talk:Flow network

message: I think these points need more explanations:
See that there can be an edge from u to v in the residual network, even though there is no edge from u to v in the original network.
and
Notice that augmenting path (s,a,b,d,c,t) does not exist in the original network, but you can send flow along it, and still get a legal flow.
I would also suggest a simpler graphs (without the returning negative flows). It's just too complex for somebody who sees this for the first time. Such simpler graph is for example at Max flow. Maybe there could be both versions with explanation that they are equivalent. Jirka6 15:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanations 

message: I have never heard that a flow must be skew symmetric and just checked my notes on maximum flow: "A flow satisfy the flow-conservation and the constraints 0 <= f(u,v) <= c(u,v)." A flow must not be skew symmetric but nonnegative. From where do you have your definition? --Zuphilip (talk) 09:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skew symmetry 

message: The following was left at WP:VE/F, as Flow conservation redirects here I'm guessing this is the article in question. Thryduulf (talk) 17:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't it supposed to be the equation \sum_{u \in V} f(u, w) - \sum_{u \in V} f(w, u) = 0? Rodichi (talk) 16:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  On flow conservation 

message: I just want to make sure that this isn't a typo. I have never seen that done in flow networks before. Jarfuls of Tweed (talk) 19:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a typo in figure 1 & 3 from node B to node A?
Talk:SunOpta

message: I couldn't get through this entire page.  The more I read, the more I felt like the company was pitching for me to buy stock.  Maybe that's the point of the NASDAQ template?  And what about the class-action lawsuits mentioned on the cellulosic ethanol page?  Seems like it might be relevant, though parts of that page are written like advertisements, too, and seem to lack sources.
Deadlyhead (talk) 00:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article sounds like it was written by a SunOpta shill
Talk:Sunlight (cleaning product)

message: Hello pals, 
I'd like to propose a change to this article's infobox. 
Unilever is listed as the "Owner", but the IBX parameters found in the provided reference state:
"...is a subsidiary or division, omit the owner field and use the parent field instead"
If this doesn't cause any editor-friction,  I'd like to circle back here soon and update the IBX myself! 
Thank you to all!
ref:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_company#:~:text=num_employees%20also%20supplied.-,parent,-The%20name(s Dunkinidaho (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  IBX Updates
Talk:Bloomfield, Connecticut

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 02:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Suez Canal Authority

message: In the section Assets, Duties and Responsibilities the article says 'The tolls are expressed in SDR  and collected in USD, GBP, EUR and other currencies....' SDR links to a disambiguation page; I assume what it refers to is Special Drawing Rights but I don't know enough about the topic to say for sure. Someone who knows more about the subject could change the SDR link to go directly to the proper article.
Stevebeck (talk) 23:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SDR
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Mihai cartoaje

message: He is vandalizing the Schizophrenia article, most recently by adding the NPOV tag to the page without discussing it.  See the article talk page and his talk page for posted warnings he has gotten. DPetersontalk 23:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving more comments that were posted in the wrong place

message: User:DPeterson - you need to respect the format of the RfC.  This is not a forum for discussion.  On this RfC, you have repeatedly responded in the Outside Views section to dismiss or rebute the arguments made there - as if this was some kind of talk page.  You have made no apologies for your actions, despite the fact that they clearly violate RfC guidelines, and have in fact proceeded to baselessly attack me when I pointed them out to you.  Furthermore, you have been doing the same on other  RfC which this user is involved in.  This is very disruptive, and contrary to policy.  Furthermore, you have the gall to then claim that's he's "vandalizing" other RfC's by removing your comments from the "Outside Views" section.  That's absurd.  Please, cease this disruptive behavior, and preserve the integrity of the RfC process. Haemo 21:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stop Misusing the RfC format
Talk:Subterranean Press

message: Im sorry, but not every limited edition they do can be catalogued here. i would say, if they publish a work first, which is then published by a larger publisher, its notable. if they publish a short story or novella as an original work, not a reprint from a collection, its notable. but limited editions of works already published by larger publishers, thats commonplace. this is not to disparage their quality or editorial integrity, just their relative notability for our purposes.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Found this article again by chance. the lists of authors and illustrators should be removed, and replaced by the notable titles they have published, as i indicated above (ive added a few to start). novellas originally from a magazine are ok. definitive editions revised by the author, ok. the key is: are they taking a "chance" on a work being sellable as a stand alone book, or are they merely cashing in on a proven seller. whoever takes the risks gets the glory. reprints are wonderful, essential, necessary, but usually not notable.(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 19:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable publications
Talk:Sub City Records

message: Thrice is still a part of subcity. It says so on Sub City's website and if you look at the artist in the ambulance it has both the island and subcity imprints on it. I won't edit it for a few days so I can give time for anyone to prove that Thrice is off Sub City.  Nickvsshark 15:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrice
Talk:Studio 6

message: This article is only a stub, but the company's sister chain, Motel 6, is a full article. Motel 6 is a name far better known than Studio 6, with many more locations. Some Studio 6 locations are on the same grounds as a Motel 6. The Motel 6 article mentions Studio 6, too. Tatterfly 21:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting a merge
Talk:M*A*S*H season 3

message: Who is adding month and year to some of the episode descriptions?  Very very few MASH episodes cite a date, and a larger subset (but still a minority) are identifiable with an approximate date.  We all know that there are too many inconsistencies and continuity errors in the series to allow any kind of timeline to be drawn ... so why tag any episodes with dates?  It is particularly useless to do so when some episodes featuring Potter, Hunnicutt and Winchester are "dated" prior to episodes featuring Blake, McIntyre and Burns.  Only one story in the whole series really hinges on a real historical event, and that is the final episode. Darcyj 08:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Datelines 

message: With the exception of "Abyssinia, Henry", the individual episode pages for Season Three fail notability guidelines, inluding the notability guidelines for television episodes, and have been tagged accordingly.  Might I suggest these articles are improved with real-world information (ie. referencing with reliable sources) to assert notability, removing trivia (seeWP:TRIVIA) quotes, overly long plot summaries (a breach of copyright) or consider merging the information onto this season page.  Otherwise, when these pages come up for review in fourteen days, they may be redirected, merged or deleted. If you want any help or info, then come to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Episode coverage. Thanks.  Gwinva 19:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode notability
Talk:Strawdog Studios

message: The article reads much as it would if written by a person connected with the company. There's no point digging into this because the major contributor has been inactive on wiki for quite a few years, but the article needs a good cleanup and fixes of tone, neutrality, cites etc.
I suspect that the company may be notable (I haven't checked and could be wrong), if so fixing rather than deletion would be appropriate. FT2 (Talk | email) 15:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged as POV
Talk:Straight Records

message: "Over the phone from a New Jersey record shop he heard a recording of The Persuasions singing."  i just watched the "From Straight to Bizarre" docu in which a member of the Persuasions recounts the group singing live in the shop.  Indeed, now that i think about it, he emphasized how the group had never recorded.  I will trust the accuracy of his recollection and change the article.  Feel free to delete this Talk Section. Fp cassini (talk) 15:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled