lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ultramontanism

message: "The Vatican Council issued numerous written attacks upon Ultramontanism." - This doesn't make any sense given the sentences following it.  The Vatican Council was opposed to Catholics adhering to Rome? Kd5mdk 10:48, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsupported? 

message: Someone please restructure /edit this page: it has no headings, is full of technical jargon, and leaves the reader (from the very opening) unclear as to what exactly 'Ultramontanism' means.Iamlondon 11:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Clarity 

message: If the "Paleoconservatives" in the U.S. are considered Ultramontanists then this definition requires a great deal more explication. Ultramontanism asserts Papal supremacy over the secular state, if this is so then how do Paleoconservatives fit in? Does the writer mean to say that Paleos are religious conservatives and would have religion dictate public policy? If so, then this needs elaboration. It's my understanding that most Paleos are of Evangelical Protestant orientation and the papalist analogy seems tenuous. LAWinans (talk) 05:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paleoconservatives = Ultramontanists? 

message: :Roman Catholic apologists argued that if the Pope has ultimate authority in the Church, then national churches would be more immune to interference from their governments. But subsequent history seems to have shown that states which had national churches grew increasingly secular, and have either granted charters of religious freedom or have disestablished the national church.
The word "But" at the start of the second sentence means that the second sentence is in contrast to the first sentence, but I don't see the contrast; they don't even seem to be talking about the same thing. The relationship between the church and the state, is the general scope of the discussion; but in one case it's saying religions would be freer if separated from the state; and in other case it's saying national churches/state religions have failed to survive into the modern age. The later developments presented in the second sentence quoted above in no way contradict the view of the unspecified "Roman Catholic apologists". I'm also concerned that the second one reads like original research.
—Felix the Cassowary 11:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarification
Talk:Mireuksa

message: The coordinates of this site are 36,00,43 north and 127,01,51 east.122.38.247.25 (talk) 21:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Datation 602 given in the lead in not backed by quotations, and moreover not clear.  For such a big monument, we should have a time for decision and a time for reception. 
The Korean web page suggests that reception=638 and says nothing about construction. The other references are even more evasive, saying between 600 and 641 (the whole range of King Mu's reign).
Another example: Koreana.
Tongue in check : the author of Mireuksa: When Fact Meets Fable tries to use "the Queen of 639 was the daughter of Jwapyeong Sataek Jeokdeok (佐平沙乇積德)" to prove "the Queen of 602 was not" ... and he gives the Seodongyo's picture of Princess Wooyoung instead of the picture of Seonhwa !  Pldx1 (talk) 18:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Datation ?
Talk:List of people executed in Illinois

message: I'm not an editor, but I did notice that the name "Walter Stewart" links to a completely different person - a Canadian author and journalist who presumably hadn't killed anybody.  Is there a way to remove the hyperlink?
: Changed the link to point to article Walter Stewart (murderer). If the link was pointing to the correct article, please correct. --ZeiP 19:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walter Stewart
Talk:Bikram Yoga

message: Bikram's claim that he studied under B.C. Ghosh has been investigated in detail, and found to be false, like several other of his claims. There is no reliable independent evidence that he did study under Ghosh to support his assertions, and on that front alone we should not assert that he did. The most we can do is to state in a footnote that he made the claim, but even that ought to be accompanied by the later evidence that he did not. The evidence includes Jerome Armstrong's 2018 book Calcutta Yoga: Buddha Bose & the yoga family of Bishnu Ghosh and Yogananda. Bikram's claim is unsafe and should not be in the article, specially not in Wikipedia's voice. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's what all the included sources in the article state. All 3 references to reliable sources, in the 2 places where it is mentioned currently in the article, do state that he studied under B.C. Ghosh. What one of those sources contends, is at what age he did start his training and also states that he was not a yoga child prodigy. If there is an independent reliable source that clearly states that he never studied under Ghosh please present it here. There is a lot of evidence that he did. The book you quoted does not say that he did not study under Ghosh. Quite the oposite, it clearly states that in 1962 at the age of 18 he was a student of Ghosh. Please see here]. Again, what could be another false claim by Bikram is the age at which he started, but that is not mentioned in the article. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, I began this with the knowledge that apparently good sources made the claims you mention, but also with the certainty of Bikram's lying about taking part in yoga competitions which didn't exist at the time, not to mention later proof of his character. I guess there is no hurry here; evidence will emerge of any falsehood. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you  you are right, there are big discrepancies in many of his claims, and some of them were very easy to disproof. In this case however, even critical sources state that he did study under Ghosh, just not the way he tells it. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:13, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bikram Choudhury's claim to have studied under Bishnu Charam Ghosh 

message: — Assignment last updated by ProfHanley (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 216
Talk:Weatherhead School of Management

message: Ok, first big revision I have ever done. With that being said:
1) Tried to organize the programs by creating an Academic Programs section and placing all relevant information under it. I will go back to the Ph.D program section later as it is in need of attention.
2) Fleshed out the introductory paragraph more. Added information about strong programs (I will link to the actual ranking publications later to lend further credibility to the claim). Also fleshed out information about the Peter B. Lewis Building.
3) Reorganized the May 2003 Shooting section. Took a cue from the edits of the VTech article, and made it a sentence in the introductory paragraph. I will also create a small stub about the actual shooter with all the information that was on the Weatherhead main site, so none of the original information is lost.Nap16 13:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: June 20 Revision

message: The 2003 shooting needs to have its own page. If we are to follow the example of the Virginia Tech article, the shooting needs to have its own page so that the school is no longer linked to the School Killings in the United States category. The Virginia Tech article mentions the shooter, but not by name, and only the article for the incident itself is linked in the category. Either that, or the article for the killer should be linked to the category, and this article should then be removed from the category listing. Any thoughts? Please contact me on my talk page if you have any suggestions for the proposed changes. SailorAlphaCentauri (talk) 19:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School Shooting 

message: Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit doesn't seem to be notable itself. Boleyn (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it -- be WP:BOLD! Bearian (talk) 21:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal: [[Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit]] to [[Weatherhead School of Management]]

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the content on this page is not copyrighted material, but rather cited factual information taken from case.weatherhead.edu with permission from the owners and managers of the website--129.22.89.86 (talk) 19:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the Duplication Detector report data and Copyvios report data only highlights commonly used phrases and the name of the school "Weatherhead School of Management" as duplicate content. --129.22.89.86 (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Bavo of Ghent

message: So I have been researching the family of which Saint Bevo belongs.  There is something rather suspicious regarding the date of Saint Bevo's birth.  
The article states that Bevo was born in the year 589 and that his father is Pepin of Landen.  All good until you read the article about Pepin of Landen and discover that his birth was 580.  
This of course would mean that Bevo is 9 years younger than his father...  I suppose it's not entirely impossible, however...  
Mister2b 19:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth... 

message: This category was recently added to the article, but there is no mention in the article of such an association, or in the sources of any such thing as a "Colombanian Order" to which he might have belonged. What gives? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 14:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Colombanian saints"
Template talk:Datetime

message: The name of the template is datetime, yet the output it produces is time, then date. Would'nt have timedate been more logical? --Turbinator 21:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's in the name 

message: To improve efficiency and so it uses less template, I replaced the current contents with . There is no difference in the functionality of the template. 
*
**substituted: 20:14, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replace contents
Talk:The Nerve Agents

message: Makes no sense. Youth of Today having a dark style?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.109.121.66 (talk) 09:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Youth of Today

message: and fan site link - 
Xfourninetwox 06:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Sessions Comp
Talk:Olaf II of Denmark

message: OLaf is a bit unfortunate version of the name, as in Norwegian he was Olav, not Olaf, and in no other language there is Olaf, I think. Arrigo 12:11, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It should obviously be merged as it concerns the same person. Just a need to decide what to merge it under. (Barend 13:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge should be to this article which has the std Wikipedia form for names of Kings. Wrt Olav vz. Olaf, afaik the Old Norse form would be Olaf, current Norwegian usage is Olav, and I frankly have no idea what his contemporaries would use. -- Egil 06:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For reference, the name of the article that has been merged into this one was Olof Haakonson. I will remove the mergefrom template. Ardric47 23:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: It should go into more depth about succession dispute in 1375 between Olaf and his mother Margaret and Albert IV, Duke of Mecklenburg, the son of Ingeborg of Denmark.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 05:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession dispute in 1375 

message: Was he overthrown? If not, what was the date of his death? --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circumstances of end of reign. 

message: False Olaf was recently split from Olaf II of Denmark - I am not convinced this needs a stand-alone article, at least not right now. The content at False Olaf was and can be readily be accommodated in Olaf II of Denmark. There seems no reason to split the content at its current length. Polyamorph (talk) 06:21, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[False Olaf]] into [[Olaf II of Denmark]]
Talk:Khwae Noi River

message: Anyone remember the words of the title song in the film of the river kwai as sung allegedly by british pows?
Hitler, he only had one ball
Himmler, had two but very small
...
But poor old Goebels had no balls at all.
:See Hitler has only got one ball. -R. fiend 15:50, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Monorchism

message: Amazonman1, while I sympathize with your cause, a Wikipedia article is not the place to voice these concerns in this manner.  If you have any information to add, please try to do so in the spirit of creating a better encyclopedia article.  I look forward to seeing any new information you might have. Thanks. Ufwuct 15:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement for convention

message: **the upper part of the Mae Klong was renamed to Kwae Yai (big tributary)
There is apparently a contradiction in the transcription here. is it kwae or khwae, with the aspirate kh? Could any Thai speaker clarify this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.21.202.46 (talk • contribs) 
:It's quite clear from reading the Thai spelling - ค (kho khwai ) us  the aspirate kh, only it is often "wrongly" transcribed as k. andy 11:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khwae or Kwae??? 

message: If this is, as the article clearly states in its opening words, the River Kwai, then why does River Kwai redirect elsewhere? Either this article or the redirect needs to be fixed. -R. fiend (talk) 13:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  River Kwai redirect 

message: Common everybody knows the name and I'm sure its the best known river in Thailand thanks to the movie. If this is not accepted then rename Rome, Roma, Athens, Athinai and Lisbon, Lisboa! --213.55.224.153 (talk) 23:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kwai please!
Talk:History of the 2005 Philippine electoral crisis

message: Forked out the events history from the Philippine electoral crisis, 2005 article into this article.--Noypi380 12:25, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Verified all the dates, and I am certain that all of them are accurate, except the first two (June 6 and June 8). I have no records on the day of June 6 and 8 itself. I have though some papers that were already released in July that "summarizes" the events but I doubt the papers accuracy too. Can someone verify the events that happened before June 10 (when Ong made his press conference)? --Noypi380 14:07, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification requested/confirmed
Talk:J. G. Greig

message: I am 'claiming' Greig as an Indian cricketer - just as Ranji is an English cricketer. He was a very large figure in contemporary Indian cricket, and was the batsman that the opponents wanted to get out while playing against the Europeans. When compared to this, his contribution to Hampshire cricket was almost nothing.
Had India achieved Test status, 30 years before they did, it is probable that Grieg would have played for them - and probably captained them. So he deserves to be honoured as an Indian cricketer, more than as an English cricketer.
Tintin 13:21, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Einars Repše

message: I have reasons to believe that the correct form is Einars without the macron. This is not a popular given name for Latvian men, but due to the similarity with a much more popular name Ainārs (which also, by the way, is often spelt without the macron, Ainars) Einars is often written with the macron. However, the official website of the New Era Party (jaunaislaiks.lv) of which he is the founder uses only the spelling Einars Repše. Therefore, I am moving this article. --Jūzeris ⇐ feedback appreciated 13:45, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The correct spelling is Einars Repše
Talk:Adiemus (albums)

message: hi, OmegaWikipedia... think you may have labelled this article a stub by mistake! I wrote it as a complete article, it's miles longer than anything else in Category:Album stubs, and it's not the kind of album that warrants a full essay in any case. I've removed the stub text. Chi Sigma 14:01, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

message: The article says that the words are made up, including presumably the titles, and that the word "adiemus" is similarly made up phoenetically.  As a Latin teacher, I can vouch that almost every one of the song titles are straight Latin--I can read them perfectly fine--and there can't be any statistical merit to saying that's a coincidence. Not only are they straight plain Latin, but they all have meanings correlative to music or the heavens or other correlative topics.  --Mrcolj 19:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not latin?

message: I'm not sure it is at all accurate to describe the instrumental use of the voice as "post-modern". The article at present mentions Vangelis: not only was it done over 20 years earlier by Pink Floyd, but also by classical composers such as Giles Swayne and Olivier Messiaen, not to mention the whole tradition of Scat singing in jazz. Myopic Bookworm 12:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-modern? 

message: Okay so 5/8 is a bit odd, but 3/2 and 6/8 are extremely common in my experience, and 9/8's not all that unusual either. The time signatures are part of the character of the music, but they shouldn't be mentioned as unusual when they aren't, I think.
Mawich 15:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not unusual time signatures 

message: There are many opinionated statements in this article, with few references to support anything of note.  Please refer to Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources before editing further.  Also, on first reading, it is not easy to ascertain whether this is an article on a group, a composer's work, or a series of albums.  I think that needs to be made clearer, and the categorisation of the article amended to reflect this.  Thanks,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Is there a better way to handle the subsection titles that keeps them all unique (per MOS:HEAD) while avoiding annoying redundancy? "Track listing for Adiemus [1/2/3/4/5]" doesn't strike me as ideal. —151.132.206.26 (talk) 14:21, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeating subsections
Talk:Mike Teavee

message: *in one of the versions, is Mike stretched by a taffy-stretching machine instead of a gum-stretching machine?SpikeJones 14:09, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

message: What is the meaning of the "2001: A Space Odyssey"-Reference? Is it just a gag or is there a deeper meaning/connection to the character Mike? --87.149.77.56 (talk) 22:17, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2001

message: Do we really need an internal link to "Stupid" from the word "dull"? Seems like a mindless edit to me...
I'm not saying that it's a bad thing to link things to and from wikipedia, but do we need to link every other word in the sentence? It makes it look like those other encyclopedia-wannabe pages out on the internet... Kareeser 02:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  internal link 

message: Does anyone know where an illustration of this character can be found from Quention Blake's drawing of the novel? It should be added... JackOfHearts 00:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Book Illustration

message: Mike as a mumbler came from the book. Added that reference in the film version. Ronyu02 07:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mumbling Mike 

message: "Mike is shown playing Unreal Tournament on his Playstation 2, and screaming, "Die! Die! Die!" The video game depicts blowing up zombies." 
The game certainly does not look like Unreal Tournament and there are no Zombies neither in Unreal Tournament. The game looks much more like Gears of War. Need someone else to verify this, I'm new and do not wish to make an incorrect change.
If I don't get an answer on this talk page I will make the change. --Sachaztan 01:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect video game 

message: I'm wondering if we should mention the possibility that the location for Mike in 2005 was Denver and that it may be a slight allusion to nearby Littleton...and thus by extension Columbine, as a reference to Mike's violent tendencies.  Any thoughts on this?--ip.address.conflict 20:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denver Colorado 

message: Mike's vice is that he watches too much TV, but isn't that kind of anachronistic to when the story was originally written? In the late 50s there was next to nothing ON TV. you MIGHT be able to watch Howdy Doody every weekday if you got there on time (and indeed the original book version has him dressed as a cowboy).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 20:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something odd
Talk:Jim Jarmusch

message: Is he making a zombie movie in 2019? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 22:47, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Added. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Zombie movie

message: The current version of this article says Jarmusch continues to smoke cigarettes (based on an article from 2009), but, in this 2019 interview, Jarmusch says he quit smoking "a few years ago." Please update this article. Source: https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/jim-jarmusch-the-dead-dont-die-interview-847447/ 173.88.246.138 (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please fix 

message: Didn't Jim Jarmusch play the Frostee Cream employee in Billy Bob Thornton's movie, Sling Blade? There is no mention of it anywhere here. Is it a different Jim Jarmusch? Traumatic (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't he in Sling Blade?
Talk:Hamble-le-Rice

message: In which parish?
2602:304:CDA6:51B0:3DCD:90C:725A:94CA (talk) 17:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Hamble-le-Rice is a civil parish in its own right; I've now added that to the lead. WaggersTALK 14:15, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parish? 
Talk:Maurice Stans

message: This article on Maurice Stans ought to be expanded to detail the extent of his involvement in the Watergate scandal.
                                    Simon
Stans was not a "key figure" in the Watergate matter though he had some ties to the thing. He was a key figure in the Nixon campaign's fund raising campaign and had contact with most of the Watergate principals, but was not directly implicated in the burglary of the Watergate complex, in the Fielding matter, in the Segretti matter or in the coverup.   Editdroid 03:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand this article. 

message: I would like to add an external link (or in another more appropriate location) to the Maurice H. Stans papers at the Minnesota Historical Society, if possible.  Thank you!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Archivist100 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link Addition? 