Talk:Jeremy (Peep Show)

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at WP:RM#How to request a page move did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for time! -- tariqabjotu 02:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Resubmitted. --McGeddon 12:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Request

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support. Although there are a lot of sources for "Jeremy Osborne" through Google, they don't seem to stem from any canonical source, and were probably just from one mistyped press release. --McGeddon 12:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Jeremy Usbourne → Jeremy (Peep Show character) — There has been an ongoing edit war over whether his surname is Usbourne or Osbourne, no reliable source has yet been found to confirm either way (the official Channel 4 website uses both variants!) so based on WP:V it must he moved to a location that doesn't use either ChrisTheDude 20:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
#Support getting far too fed up with all the edit warring ChrisTheDude 20:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments:
#Comment, it was written with a U on the letter in "Jurying" and this Guaridan article lists it with a U  the fact that the offcial site uses both is irritating though. Through this, I'm not going to support or object right now. Gran2 15:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 09:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
#Support getting far too fed up with all the edit warring ChrisTheDude 20:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Add any additional comments:
#Comment, it was written with a U on the letter in "Jurying" and this Guaridan article lists it with a U  the fact that the offcial site uses both is irritating though. Through this, I'm not going to support or object right now. Gran2 15:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 09:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I actually decided to e-mail Channel 4 for the correct surname spelling, and they replied saying that it was "Osbourne". If anyone wants the email I'll happily forward it. And as proof I'm not just saying this, I've been an Usbourne supporter all along. Gran2 18:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's original research though, surely?  So we can't use it anyway......... ChrisTheDude 22:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite apart from the fact that Channel 4 is only the broadcaster. An e-mail from the production company or - better still - the writers would carry more weight, but either way it's still OR. 23:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I have confirmation

message: This is coming up again and again, despite in-page warnings. Perhaps it would be better to have a section specifically dealing with the conflicting evidence? As it stands, people keep turning up saying, "it's on the letter/subtitles/CD/whatever," probably giving weight to whatever they've seen in ignorance of all the others. Nick Cooper 08:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recurring surname dispute

message: I added Jeremy to Fictional atheists.
In Season 1 in particular when he's looking for a religion after hearing he may have an hereditary illness he eventually dismisses them as all "rubbish". Also when with his uncle ray whose just converted to christianity he says (in a voice over) that it's a shame all his cherished beliefs are rubbish. In Season 4 not much seems to have changed as when he's about to urinate on the church he mocks Richard Dawkins for talking the talk but not actually following through "with an act of piss". NeoRicen (talk) 09:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional atheist 

message: Sorry to be pedantic, but the information about Jeremy once being a nurse seems incorrect. In the job interview he does credit himself as having been a nurse, but is clearly a lie - Marks incredulous expression confirms this. May I suggest this is revised? 217.44.46.86 (talk) 19:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeremy 

message: In episode 2 of Season 5, when Jez and Super Hans are listening to Barney's track. Jez states:
"I think that what's happening is 2 or maybe 3 different musical things, all at the same time."
Super Hans replies:
"This is the kinda thing we should be doing."
Just wondering if this is worth a mention in the music section. Also I was wondering if it would be good to mention the dispute between Jez and Super Hans regarding the name of the band they are in? Davidbhoy2805 (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision to "Music" section