lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ustrinum

message: The "References" are apparently truncated orphans, copied & pasted from a different page, with abbreviations nobody can understand w/o having a Sherlock Holmes-type talent. It seems that the 2008 creator of this article is , who abruptly stopped editing in May 2017 - I hope he's OK. He wrote at 16:19, 25 January 2008: "Created page with 'In ancient Rome". It might mean that in 2008 the abbreviations corresponded to notes & bibliography entries on the ancient Rome page. Anyone interested in looking it up? Arminden (talk) 03:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, sorted. It was all based on Platner's LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS at Lacus Curtius. It's almost all material from 1900-1910, and I would be surprised if all pre-WWI interpretations are still accepted after > 1 century. Arminden (talk) 23:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless "References". Article practically unsourced  as of now.
Talk:Vodacom Tanzania

message: GoLLoMboje (talk) 17:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Help
Talk:Salisbury Cathedral School

message: is this a picture? I think it is, but it does not look like the pic on the schools web page Victuallers (talk) 16:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Izzue

message: All proper company materials use the logo "http://www.izzue.com", but people refer to the company as "Izzue". Is it possible to create an article with the title "http://www.izzue.com" ? Seems like it would mess up the URL. Krymson (talk) 17:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Laminate

message: This is also a geological term, which isn't discussed on this page. I'm trying to find out more about it, in order to define it for a training class. Any ideas?
yes  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.89.62.130 (talk) 09:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a suggestion on Lamination 4 months ago to redirect it here, since both articles covered the same material and this article is more evolved.  There was no further comment, so I did redirect it here.  I was about to go through all the articles that linked to Lamination and link them here instead, but then I thought:  maybe this article wants to be "Lamination", now that that title is available?  Eleven even (talk) 09:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Mercedes-Benz M104 engine

message: I changed the hp value of the 3.2 l 104.99x back to 220. If you disagree please post source. MB WIS states 220 hp.
Parts of the section under "2.8 L M104.94x" are poorly written. Needs help. 198.175.55.5 (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

message: If this is true, please add link or citation. Tsikhotskyi19 (talk) 09:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture of M104 uses in buliding Toyota 1FZ-FE engine?
Talk:Young X-Men

message: I just want to know if its been confirmed if that is, indeed, Donald Pierce that appears in Young X-Men. If it is there should probably be a link to confirm it, or just wait until the comic comes out and we know for sure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alotofsparetime (talk • contribs) 20:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the source did not check out, so my guess is that no, it is not confirmed, i have removed said unscourced information. Rau J16 22:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Donald Pierce has been confirmed as a main villain for the series, slaying an unknown member of the Young X-Men, in the opening scenes of the first issue. Elemental5293 (talk) 03:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Donald Pierce?

message: Since the series has begun now, I just did a total overhaul of the page, with the team members, story summary, removing some of the more redundant information in the top.  SoulReaverDan (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's nice, needs a little attention here and there, but overall very nice. Good Job. Rau's Speak Page 00:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Overhaul
Talk:Frankie Housley

message: Link posted here previously no longer works. Try this Google page created using Frankie Housley:  https://www.google.com/#hl=en&safe=off&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=frankie+housley&oq=frankie+housley&gs_l=hp.3..0j0i30.1583.7286.0.7612.15.11.0.4.4.0.280.1571.0j9j2.11.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.o7Ji9_6-q2M&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1354675689,d.b2U&fp=b0dac32a218a050e&bpcl=39650382&biw=1280&bih=887Obbop (talk) 15:11, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Follow-up story
Talk:Klimov VK-1

message: The External Links section has some very useful historical and tech links, albeit in Czech & Russian languages.  Since the links are html, the reader can drop the content into Google Translate and get a quite readable English translation.  This is useful since English language information on Russian technology is very scarce.  I re-added one link from "Engine" magazine that appears to have been deleted accidentally, and urge engineering historians not to ignore it :-) Santamoly (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Klimov VK-107

message: Herschel Smith in his book 'AircraftPiston Engines' says the bore is actually 145mm, not the oft published 148mm in common with the 105 and 106 engines. AMCKen (talk) 19:42, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bore

message: The data sheet on the picture from the museum says 650kg, not 765.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.105.155.183 (talk) 22:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight
Talk:Lyulka AL-21

message: The information in this article regarding superiority of this design to the J79 turbojet is, to the best of my knowledge, largely correct....but it is poorly sourced. A post from an aviation forum is generally not considered an acceptable source, and I don't see why an exception would be made here without more information. Tres Linguas (talk) 01:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the claims, as forums are not reliable sources. - BilCat (talk) 05:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Sources
Talk:Shvetsov ASh-82

message: I can't believe the major variants of ASh-82s used turbochargers. Isn't it confusion between mechanical supercharger and turbocharger? ----Punu (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASh-82 used turbocharger? 

message: I notice it says that "most Fw 190 replicas use the Dongan HS-7", which is a license built ASh-82V. Is this because the ASh-82V has a built-in cooling fan, being for use in helicopters? The original BMW 801 had a cooling fan built in, so I'm wondering if they use that variant because it is one of the few engines available with a cooling fan. But then I see that some Fw 190s' use R-2800's, which can't have cooling fans. Maybe they just treat the engines a lot more gently than they did in combat, so they don't overheat? AnnaGoFast (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fw 190 replicas 

message: It says the Shvetsov is a lightened variant óf the Cyclone "This allowed the engine to be used in light aircraft, where an American-design Twin Cyclone, of some 930 kg (2,045 lb) weight in "dry" condition could not be installed." But in the specs it says the Shvetsov dry weight is actually even 100 kg higher than the Cyclone. "Dry weight: 1,020 kg (2,250 lb)" Cancun771 (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The apparent contradiction is due to the engine in the specs section being an 82T, a late development version, the final version, the 82V, weighed 1,100 kg. The first 82 weighed 850 kg which is lighter than the Cyclone. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 08:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight Contradiction
Talk:Our Choice

message: we need a picture about the book cover page .--Tamás Kádár (talk) 10:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ahh...we'll get a picture once its released. Note how both Amazon and Barnes & Nobles don't have an image yet. Once they get it, we'll get it. --haha169 (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book photo
Talk:Tumansky R-11

message: Could someone find out what was the time between two engine overhaul?
I have unverified information that MiG-21 was constructed in such way that the engine coul be changed cmpletley in max 4h. That because it was necessary to do that after 20h ao use of the engine.
 Vacu um (talk) 23:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifetime for the engine
Talk:Tumansky R-15

message: The MiG-31 is able to supercruise but I don't think the MiG-25 was. It was certainly capable of sustained supersonic flight - Tumansky rated the R15B capable of continuous afterburner for 40 minutes - but I don't think the MiG-25 could do it without afterburners. "MiG-25 'Foxbat' MiG-31 'Foxhound' Russia's Defensive Front Line", Yefim Gordon, 1997, Aerofax Midland Publishing Ltd, p48. Flanker235 (talk) 09:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  MiG-25 supercruise? 

message: Just wondering how much of this is speculative:
"However, a more probable series of events would be the eventual destruction of the engine as the suction force of the compressors began to pull various engine parts through the ignition chamber and turbines."
There's no citation for it. Does anyone else think this should be removed pending further research?  Flanker235 (talk) 14:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation? 

message: It seems strange that such a hugely powerful engine has only 5 stages and a single turbine; that seems very ,very few for an engine of that era. Is that something to do with it being intended for high altitude/high speed flight, and the reason it's so inefficient at lower levels? AnnaGoFast (talk) 20:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Few stages 

message: This uncited line is echoing a widely repeated myth that keeps getting reprinted without citation or justification and I'm not sure why it's even needed. It gives the impression that there's some magic line which will destroy the engine if passed, yet not catastrophically enough to prevent the aircraft returning to base and landing... there is enough misinformation in the world about R-15s blowing up/turning to slag/whatever after a Mach 3+ dash already. No such situation is supported by the engine's technical documentation, the aircraft's technical documentation, even a basic understanding of metallurgy or turbine construction, or reliable pilot/engineer accounts - didn't this story about the engines being replaced after the Sinai dash start with Belenko? It's bad enough when this story is reprinted uncritically by English-language sources, but here it doesn't even cite said reprints. Even a cursory inspection of the MiG-25's aerodynamics manual describes stability reasons and friction heating of the aircraft structure as being the reason for the M 2.83 service limit, not some mythical sensitivity of the engine. 157.211.12.220 (talk) 02:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects of flight beyond Mach 3
Talk:Ethylene carbonate

message: From:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethylene_carbonate#Applications
"It can be used as a high permittivity component of electrolytes in lithium batteries."
Electrolytes should have have LOW permittivity. "permittivity relates to a material's ability to resist an electric field (while unfortunately the word stem "permit" suggests the inverse quantity)."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permittivity  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.216.17.99 (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect use of permittivity? 

message: "A serious contender for the future of cooling". Perspective by Emmanuel Delay, Cool it, with a pinch of salt, Science 23 Dec 22, Vol 378 issue 6626, p 1275, and article Ionocaloric refrigeration cycle same issue pp 1344-1348, by Drew Lilley and Ravi Prasher. 
This is a proof of concept of new approach to refrigeration, with significant advantages, and at least one drawback, but which may yield to further developments. It uses ethlyene carbonate as the solvent that is melted by NaI and regenerated by electrodialysis. AJim (talk) 03:25, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  solvent for ionocaloric refrigeration, another use 

message: Basic information to add to this article: this chemical's effects on human health. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Ivan Crnojević

message: This article is POV. Ivan Crnojevic was one of the greatest Serb heroes in the world. He continued the life of the Serbian Empire in one of its tiny parts. How could one read that from the article? --PPNjegos (talk) 17:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hey I've reverted it as its definitely going to be controversial. If you have a source great. Otherwise can you discuss it on the talk page first? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 20:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks like a very reliable source, but I can't see the exact quote from the book which shows it. Can you point it out? Thanks. PS I'd rather discuss this here so its all in one place, your talk page is on my watchlist :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is in a fourth sentence from the end of page 388. It is written ...Bosnian regional lord Herzeg Stjepan Vukčić-Kosaca...Kebeta (talk) 21:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that's clear, I think it'll need to be discussed on the talk page. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Very well! Kebeta (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to [[Ivan I Crnojević]]
Talk:Downrock

message: I am thinking that this page should be deleted and replaced with a redirect to the "Downrock" section of the breakdancing article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-boying
ForgetfulDoryFish (talk) 03:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it could be merged with the footwork article? Is there a significant difference that necessitates two distinct articles? J.Dong820 (talk) 01:22, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: should this page be deleted?
Talk:HM Prison Peterhead

message: If people want to find out more about him, they should at least be let known that the page exists.  Cheers Fishiehelper2 (talk) 18:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the link wasn't to an article about him (it was a disambiguation page). - Dudesleeper  Talk 20:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I've now (pipe)linked him as John Maclean (socialist). - Dudesleeper  Talk 20:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers for that. I couldn't understand why he would be unlinked! Fishiehelper2 (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why has John Maclean been unlinked?
Talk:Vidura College

message: I removed the following motto from the school's infobox, because it is mangled: "Onslef is Own's Protector". If that was supposed to be "Oneself is one's own protector" please substitute that back into the article.--Srleffler (talk) 19:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. I found the correct text in the body of the article.--Srleffler (talk) 19:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto 

message: Several edit summaries state that they added references but the edits merely added wikilinks. Please read WP:REF and WP:V. References are the sources of your information. Other editors should be able to verify the content of an article by checking the references. This article has wikilinks to related articles but does not indicate the sources for the content of this article. Sbowers3 (talk) 19:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikilinks are not references 

message: I restored the tags (cleanup, etc.). It would be best if you let outside editors decide when those tags can be removed. I also restored the categories; they were okay - no reason to remove them.
In your edit summaries you said that you "referenced" but you did not. References indicate the source of your information. Ideally each section of the article would have a footnote to indicate where you found that information. All content in Wikipedia should be verifiable by other editors. The information cannot be just something that you know; it must be something that appeared in a reliable source that other editors can read to verify that the information in the article is correct. Near the bottom of the article should be a section called "References" followed by a list of all the sources of the footnotes that appeared previously in the article.
You may not know all the details of how to make a footnote. For now, you should just provide your sources as URLs if the information came from a web page or as the title of a published book or newspaper if the information came from printed paper. As much as possible you should try to find sources that are independent of the college. If you can find any newspapers or magazines that contain information about the college, those would be very good to provide. Sbowers3 (talk) 02:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored tags 

message: Answers 2402:D000:8130:13DC:F194:E8B7:87FC:DCAE (talk) 13:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vidura college motto
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Meerkat Manor

message: *CANNOT SUPPORT AT THIS STAGE. NEEDS REWORKING FOR AN ENGAGING ARTICLE. While picture-perfect regarding grammar, punctuation, blah blah blah, the article could be improved by moving the second paragraph in the lead to another place. The lead I believe is supposed to draw the reader in, making her want to read further. The second paragraph is a big stumbling block for me. I stopped after a bit and moved right to the body of the article. I would also like to see the massive blocks of text in the body of the article broken up with the pictures, maps, charts, whatever. Visually, the body of the article is a trial on the eyes, and a daunting undertaking for a fan  of Meerkat Manor (or anyone else) looking for engaging material about the show. CANNOT SUPPORT AT THIS STAGE. NEEDS REWORKING FOR AN ENGAGING ARTICLE.
ModelCitizenAward08 (talk) 03:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:John Walker (organist)

message: *I've created this Article today, as the subject certainly meets Wikipedia: Notability requirements. –JGHowes talk -  18:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science & Technology University

message: I've created this article, but I've not enough information about its departments. 
If anyone have the list of 32 departments please include it.Thank you. Tanvir che (talk) 19:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: On the university page it states that it was established in 1999, not in 2002 as claimed here. Deadstar (talk) 14:17, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of establishment
Talk:Renault Scénic

message: Renault Grand Scénic redirects to this article but it doesn't mention anything about this model. The Seventh Taylor (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for addressing this, whoever solved it. The Seventh Taylor (talk) 07:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Scénic 

message: Just a thought.  All of the car articles would benefit from having the carrying capacity.  I use these pages to decide if a certain car rental will work for me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.12.133 (talk) 13:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a thought: No offence meant but please use a header (or use the function 'new section') when what you write has nothing to do with the above. The Seventh Taylor (talk) 07:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carrying capacity 

message: What country and what year are the trim levels of the Scénic III in the article from? Renault has different trim levels for different countries.  
Maaher (talk) 07:47, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trim Levels
Talk:Renault Koleos

message: No one's mentioned the name?  κολεος is ancient Greek for scrotum.  I'm not trolling or kidding-- get a Liddel Scott Jones and check for yourself.  It's the same as culeus or culleus in Latin, which is just the Greek word taken into the Latin by transliteration.  Renault has just named a car "the scrotum" and Wikipedia hasn't even a word about this?
* Well it is strange, when you translate κολεος from Greek to English with google, you don't get scrotum, you get vagina. Hektor (talk) 06:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd name. 
Talk:Ledward Kaapana

message: It's my understanding that the okina is not used in the names or titles but is used in the body per wp:name. correct me if I'm wrong. --MercolaOverMerck♫ (talk) 19:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Renault Voiturette

message: Text mentions the Type C being Renault's first 4-passenger car and the Type D is, if I understand correctly, the same car but with the stronger 5 HP engine and a "retractable roof". It is referred to as a "convertible in the side box which is misleading. These cars were called "Tonneau". Picture of the Type D clearly shows a three-passenger car with a top for the front seat, leaving the single passenger at the rear in the open. This style, in U.S. called "Roadster" or "Runabout", would be a "Phaeton" or a "Spyder" in France. --Chief tin cloud (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Type D

message: Made the following change in the lead section: . According to the article De Dion-Bouton the company left the motor car business between the thirties and the fifties. If realiable sources can be found that they still made motors for Renault up until the seventies, the passage can be reinserted. 83.253.13.90 (talk) 22:51, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced De Dion-Bouton passage deleted
Talk:Malondialdehyde

message: "The structure of this species is more complex than this formula suggests." -- Needs clarification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.131.57.203 (talk) 20:43, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is clarified in the rest of the article, where it is indicated that it is a tautomeric molecule. Evn the chembox image points to it. Plasmic Physics (talk) 22:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: I know a lot of veterans including myself that came back with deep depression PTSD and by 50 other things and I know all my vet your friends that said there is no pill in the world or no medication no healing no much praying that’s going to fix us and he was right we just have to learn to live with it and learn to try to get it out as best we can and I will after losing a lot of friends I am willing to try this because I’ve had friends called to me veterans and said to change their life forever Because my self I went face for a side of a freaking black hawk because I was I had the ropes but we got hit with an RPG and I went down and I crushed the front duck foot thing out the front door lol but my brain whatever with the serotonin adopt me and pockets are so it crushed all that in and I can’t produce it by myself so this does this helps me a little but still I just want to know what everybody thinks about it It’s very hard to get I can’t grow it I don’t know how but what up with anybody wants to help me or let me know 108.7.229.205 (talk) 11:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topic is Microdosing stymie anybody have a good things to say or bad things using psychedelics