lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KXTV/KOVR tower

message: Why was it possible to build it taller than 2000ft?
The tower is located in Walnut Grove, CA, roughly halfway between Sacramento, the city of license for KXTV and Stockton, the city of license for KOVR.  It was built in 1985 in a joint venture between KXTV & KOVR.  It is adjacent to the 1549 foot "candelabra" tower that was built in 1962 and served for more than two decades as the primary tower for KXTV, KOVR, KCRA, and KVIE.
189.164.161.157 (talk) 16:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why could it be built taller than 2000 ft

message: I'm quite sure this tower was built considerably earlier then 2000. I have a photo of the tower dated 1991.
It was built in the 80s .   The 2015 date is wrong  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:7601:A741:556C:F82F:E050:4DF (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of construction 

message: This tower was featured in a fall 2006 CW31/UPN31 local news report that showed a graphic of the Walnut Grove tower radiation pattern. It is a CW31 screencap taken Nov 22, 2006, 08:48am. --Mouse209 68.185.68.167 20:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Radiation Pattern
Talk:Fail-deadly

message: The dead man's switch page says it is a fail-safe device. That makes more sense to me, but I don't know enough to feel confident to remove the link from this page and move it to the fail-safe page. Anyone know for sure? We should certainly be consistent, whatever the real situation is. -- S
:Is seems consistent, look at the beginning of Dead man's switch. I used that to clarify. Besides, note that "safe" for the bomber means no risk that the bomb does not explode.--Patrick 13:42, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If a suicide bomber's entire strategy is to explode the bomb and being shot or overpowered causes the detonation of same, it seems to me as though he/she has "succeeded"! -- Jack 2006/01/13
:No, because he did not get far enough into a thick crowd before being overpowered by officers. Besides, the term "fail" in fail-safe still stands, even though if something dissipated safely it's not truly a failure. Both terms refer to backup salvaging strategies when the original plan fails. --Geoffrey 02:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was referenced in Dr Strangelove, but that's the only time I've ever heard the term used. SpigotMap 19:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

text: IMO someone should either find a valid reference for this (apparently bogus) article or have it deleted.  Wikipedia is a springboard for so much personal contrivance.  It's just amazing.  Needless to say, someone will actually cite this mess (or its countless mirrors) as an authority and next year this barfy word will be on CNN.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.118.143 (talk) 07:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about "Success-deadly"?
Talk:Ralf Schumacher

message: Did Schumacher start racing aged three or did he just start driving? I suspect it is the latter but I could be wrong. Anyone know? SamH 10:02, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This BBC Sport article  claims Max Mosley said "Ralf('s impact) was 78G...". I can't find any other claims regarding the g-force of Schumacher's crash but I suspect that Mosley is correct. SamH 09:24, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are there any sources for "PO" for USA 05? Every source will say DNS, because Schumacher did not start. This invention of extra categories for the results table is ludicrous. Bretonbanquet 17:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: USA 05

message: After the 2003 year review, the article states "Schumacher became the third highest paid driver in Formula 1 in 1999, when his pay after the 2000 season was raised to $15.5 million US". The order of events is clearly illogical, so there must be an error somewhere. Any one know what this should be? Jimmynuts (talk) 17:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pay in 2000?

message: This is from the Personal life section. Schumacher married in October 2001 and had his first child in the same month???
Is this true?--JerichoNation (talk) 00:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake story?
Talk:Unified field theory

message: I would like to suggest that the introduction section be referenced by a known paper or physics book, as some may catch this in the future, and say it is not referenced, thus inaccurate, even though it is.--Craxd (talk) 20:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction section 

message: Somebody should clean up the last few paragraphs under "Current Status". There's nonsense there about prayers and pyramids being built overnight... and of course absolutely no references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.37.152.229 (talk) 09:08, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --mfb (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: The section Fields in the Introduction is completely missing references and hyperlinks.It actually stands out like that.
It uses a number of terms like Global Events, Universal Topology, and Operational Environment that I can't find elsewhere.
And it seems to be written by a single author with only a numeric IP address.
Is this section valid? Can perhaps someone who knows more about the topic clean it up? Klaas van Aarsen (talk) 21:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up section Fields in Introduction? 

message: "The goal of a unified field theory has led to a great deal of progress for future theoretical physics, and progress continues." It's already marked "cit. needed", but over and above that, it mixes past, present and future in a confusing way. "Has led", present perfect, says progress has occurred in the recent past and its results persist: this would be fine, but how can it be true "for future theoretical physics"? I suggest dropping the sentence. Wegesrand (talk) 12:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede ends with mysterious sentence
Talk:Alexander Lodygin

message: This article reads:
:In 1874, Petersburg Academy of Sciences awarded him with a Lomonosov Prize for his invention of the filament lamp.
Is this 'Lomonosov Prize' the same as the Lomonosov Gold Medal? According to the Lomonosov Gold Medal article, that award was started in 1959, which doesn't jibe with the date given for Lodygin's award. 
Is there a different Lomonosov Prize? Is one of the articles inaccurate? Or am I missing something?
Kevyn 11:51, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Lomonosov Prize? Need clarification

message: "Lodygin's ideas were almost always ahead of his time. He invented an incandescent light bulb before Edison, but it was not commercially profitable."
Ok, but who didn't invent an incandescent light bulb before Edison. The relevant article points to a large number of people who did. Perhaps this needs rewording without the priori that Edison invented the light bulb.
Lodygin was far from the first and decades after the first to invent an impractical and non-commercuially viable incandescent light. And a patent number is needed for the tungsten filament bulb he supposedly sold to GE. Even if GE did buy rights to some patent, this might have been to head off the interminable patent litigation which extended most of the way hrough the duration of Thomas Edison's patent. Is there a reliable source which says that GE's tungsten bulb of 1906 was based on earlier work by Logygin? If not, this POV claim should be removed. Edison (talk) 15:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahead of his time 

message: *A reference is needed for the claim that he invented scuba gear. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Scuba gear
Talk:Constantia Jones

message: Note the archived deletion debate for this article may be found at Talk:Constantia Jones/delete. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 14:15, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I once said to someone "never mess with a family historian" and my ability to find useless information is something I pride myself on.  At  is a complete list of all the female executions at Tyburn from 1735 to 1799.  Under December 22 1738 one can find:
:22nd December, Constancia Jones, Tyburn, Hanged, with 2 men, Pickpocket
I'll go and withdraw my objection to this page on the vfd debate. Although, I am still wary whether this shows bias against prostitutes or just harsh laws.  I would be concerned about adopting secondary evidence from another author that this demonstrates bias, and anything else is not NPOV. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 16:34, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Execution date

message: With the execution date added, I have no central beef with the factuality of this article.  I do believe that the particular case is best seen as illustrative rather than significant, however.  I am much more at peace and do not dispute the article. Geogre 17:24, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recantation 

message: It is an interesting case, but the paragraph about Linebaugh's opinions certainly needs some serious NPOVing. Unless someone comments otherwise, in a few days I will work on the following points:
# For a start, it is mathematically impossible for a single sample to indicate a bias. Can the original article author tell us if Linebaugh used this as just one of a series of case studies? Perhaps we can work in references to New Historicism, if that is a formal concept?
# Secondly, unless matters changed a great deal between 1738 and the nineteenth century, the fact that she was hanged means she was tried by a jury, and as such if anything is indicated it is about the jury rather than the court.
# Thirdly, once again unless the law has changed a good deal, the fact that the defendant had multiple prior convictions would not even have been mentioned to the jury.
# The first part of the sentence beginning "Prostitutes are always ..." is opinionative, the second part is begging the question.
# There's got to be more to the case. It seems a remarkably large amount of cash to have sitting loose in your pocket, yet apparently the jury believed it. Was the victim very wealthy? In which case, why, indeed, did he testify at all? I'll see if I can get a copy of the listed reference - or can Wikisux answer some questions for us?
BTW, it is my understanding that "threepenny upright" is a genuine term of abuse . It means a prostitute who charges threepence (that being the price of one night's accomodation in a doss house), and - having nowhere to take her clients - leans against a wall for the act. Thus the speaker is not only accusing the woman in question of being a very cheap prostitute, but also implying that she is ugly (or else would charge more). This makes his testimony even more odd! Securiger 06:21, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on POVness
Talk:National Chi Nan University

message: I have been studying the "brief history" published at the university's English website, and have had trouble trying to work out what these entries mean:
* 30 Sep 1995 First class of graduate students register and begin their studies. 
* 24 Sep 1996 First class of freshman undergraduates register. 
* 21 June 1997 First graduate student commencement. 
* 10 June 2000 First undergraduate student commencement.
Did graduate students start studies in 1995 or commence studies in 1997? (There must be some distinction between the two, but I can't see it at the moment!)
Marknew 12:18, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: In 1995 the school receive first graduate students. And in 1997 and 2000, I think, the word "commencement" should be change to "graduation ceremony" or "graduated".Roscoe x 17:01, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I am removing the list of colleges and departments per WP:NOTDIR (point no. 7) and WP:UNIGUIDE: Because Wikipedia is not a directory, do not attempt to list every major, degree, or program offered in this or any section.... Phlar (talk) 00:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of colleges and departments
Talk:Tenth emergency special session of the United Nations General Assembly

message: "The session may be summed up with the words of spokesperson Jan Fischer, it is [on] illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory."
Mehn, that Jan Fischer's quote is as far from NPOV as it's possible. --Anton Adelson, Western Australia 13:01, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I'm taking care of it now. - Korpios 16:54, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc
Talk:Retinoblastoma

message: Article text modified from a government website
http://www.cancer.gov/cancerinfo/pdq/treatment/retinoblastoma/patient/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Popsracer (talk • contribs) 13:07, 5 July 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: is it worth noting that Derek Fisher's daughter just had surgery for this?  He spoke about it in the post game interview just a few minutes ago.  Maxterpiece 04:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: derek fisher

message: Genetical info is lacking. The disease is autosomal and dominantly linked, with a frequency of 1/25000.   We need to find a reference. I don't have one. Madskile 21:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autosomal dominant 

message: People have been trying to add info which may be under a 'normal' copyright.  Please don't add this until we are sure and have proof the org permits it, as it's against the wiki rules and possibly against the law.  This protects other sites as well as wiki because we are not stealing text they might not want used, often people are not aware how the content on wiki can be used and they need to be sure they want to release the info under the GFDL. Sticky Parkin 10:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: possibly copyrighted info

message: Following the lead of the featured Wkikpedia Poland page on retinoblastoma, I am preparing a few paragraphs on genetic testing.Nprigoda (talk) 12:04, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetic testing 

message: Seminar doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61137-9 JFW | T@lk 20:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lancet 
Talk:Ancistrus

message: removed 'bluechin xenocara' from 'ancistrus dolichopterus' in the listing - if a discrete page for 'ancistrus dolichopterus' is created then the current redirect from 'ancistrus dolichopterus' will have to be removed - clearly any common names should be mentioned in the article (and not the title)HappyVR 17:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: links

message: Can anyone provide links, references or books/articles to read concern the bristles of ancistrus species - The only infomation I can find is that the bristles are fleshy (an may excreet a substance related to rearing fry/breeding).
The sort of thing I am looking for is internal structure eg is there a blood supply, what is the bristle made of etc.
Additionally it seems that the bristles grow on the margins of the head plates - can anyone give any further info relating to the position of the bristles and the bony structure underlying it.HappyVR 16:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: bristles

message: Made quite a big change to the article today  - in general formatted as per WikiProject fishes,removed some invalid species and added some new ones, adding some new references and separating aquarium keeping into a separate section. Hope the article is still ok.HappyVR 20:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My changes

message: Quote: " It is thought that the eggs of the bristle-nosed pleco are light sensitive, albino fish may be the result of exposure to excesive light"
This is interesting - has anyone got more information on this, specifically any studies?FengRail (talk) 19:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: The range in the image shows Ancistrus located in west Africa and SE Asia. I have no idea what genus this could be the range for, but Ancistrus isn't it. I don't have image-editing software on my computer at the moment - if anyone else could change it, that would be great. 98.206.136.121 (talk) 04:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Range Image
Talk:NYSE American

message: This article needs an overhaul.  There are two approaches: leave the sourced stuff in place from 2006-2008 even though it is non-encyclopedic, or cut the article down to the content that is either significant in an encyclopedic sense, or at least current. For example, the three months it was called "Alternext", I'd cut as not being important in a permanent sense. patsw (talk) 14:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely missing is the period of time the AMEX was acquired by NASDAQ (in 1998) at the request of the SEC - AMEX was involved at the time in creating Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and NASDAQ wanted to launch the QQQ, but not on NASDAQ itself.  108.82.248.203 (talk) 10:27, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and out-of-date 

message: The discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the curb has some information/references that may benefit this article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:18, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for deletion/On the curb

message: It seems to lean towards history rather than today. Lets ad more info on the AMEX today. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)   C 22:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues here 

message: This page contains registered trademarks of Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. ("ICE") or its affiliates that are being used without an indication that they are trademarks. On behalf of ICE, we suggest the following be added as the last sentence of the lead section: 
“The terms American Stock Exchange®, AMEX®, New York Stock Exchange®, NYSE®, NYSE MKT®, NYSE American®, and Intercontinental Exchange® are registered trademarks of Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates.”  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.175.3.8 (talk) 21:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of ICE Registered Trademarks
Talk:Cherokee Park

message: This article needs a photo taken in the daylight during the spring.  The current one makes the park look drab. -- Stevietheman 15:22, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs a better photo or photos

message: Apparently there's a basketball player named Cherokee Parks. Is there any chance of confusion here? --W.marsh 03:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a dab link at the top of each article linking to each other would be interesting for the reader. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 04:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dab?
Talk:Biopic

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion July 5 to July 12 2004, was redirected.  Discussion:
Dictdef of a Variety-speak slang word.  RickK 06:21, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete.  Same user posted a bizarre dicdef/substub called Late night that I've nominated as a speedy.  If anyone objects, please feel free to move it here. - Lucky 6.9 06:33, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:HMS Fox

message: "On a hill above Diyatalawa in Sri Lanka (then Ceylon) is the outline of a running fox; underneath is '1913 HMS Fox', all done in whitewashed stones. This was reputedly done by crew members who had mutinied, though I have been unable to find any historical reference to this incident." - curious anon addition moved here from the article. Stan 15:26, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Un-referenced addition removed
Talk:USS San Juan (SSN-751)

message: I cleaned up and wikifyed the article. There were information that I could not keep because I could not find a notable source for the information. Any editor that can add information (with WP:VERIFY sources of course) please do so! ChadH (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Article really needs more info, like assigned Commanders/Captains, Task Force assignments, current or past port assignments?? Only a Start class. LanceBarber (talk) 08:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for reviewing it! I have found one more source on the first through ice surface http://www.csp.navy.mil/asl/Timeline.htm I'll try and add it in today if not someone else can. ChadH (talk) 18:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

text: I too found more, and added it. Team work! B-class. Cheers Chad. LanceBarber (talk) 05:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great! Thanks for the additions and the review! ChadH (talk) 16:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Update 
Talk:Honeywell Bangalore

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion July 5 to July 13 2004, was redirected to Honeywell.  Discussion:
I think this is a vanity page about User:Manikraina's office.  Redirect to Honeywell is, on reflection, probably the best bet. Dunc_Harris|☺ 15:49, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Campsis radicans

message: Somebody just game me a "pod".  When do I plant and how deep?  Also, can I expect flowers in 2006 from seeds?  Thanks!  
Please E-Mail me at wac27372@yahoo.com.  
Sue from St. Charles (St. Louis)
My Trumpet Vine has never bloomed and it is 4-5 years old.  However, this year for the first time a few buds have appeared.  I'm waiting for it to bloom.
Betty (New York)
The main article makes no mention of the light requirements of the Trumpet Vine. If someone reading this knows this information could you please add that to the main article. I'm looking for a vine other than the English Ivy that does well in a mostly shady area. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.79.9.59 (talk) 23:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Growing from seed 

message: I've had a trumpet vine for many years. It does not have tendrils. It does produce short modified roots which attatch to wood or siding (not brick). Apparently they attatch to tree bark in the wild. In contact with such a surface these roots seem to produce an adhesive substance which fastens the vine to that surface. This material is difficult to remove from siding etc.
A new Trumpet Vine will take about four years to flower, and should flower reliably every summer thereafter. When pruning, remember the vine flowers on old wood. The vine is also very deep rooted. I've moved mine successfully, but only with a great deal of digging.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acme Gridley (talk • contribs) 04:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trumpet Vine Tendrils 

message: I've found trumpet vines that look just like it with no non-similarities in Ohio!
--TZLNCTV (talk) 15:27, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: It's not southeastern, it's just plain Eastern!

message: The flower photo illustrating this article does NOT show the species Campsis radicans; it is either C. grandiflora (the Asian species) or more likely one of the hybrids between the two. 160.111.254.17 (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo is not C. radicans
Talk:Of Moths and Men

message: "...In addition, later experiments would appear to support Kettlewell's conclusions...."
Wikipedia seems to be completely one sided for an "objective encylopedia" and, more damaging. inaccurate!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.89.150.130 (talk) 16:06, July 5, 2004 (UTC)
Then fix it. Bertus 12:28, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias and inaccuracy 

message: I tagged this article because it is a long long way from NPOV.  I've read this book as a confirmed believer in evolution.  It is not the book described here.  --Richard Clegg 09:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like accuracy rather than NPOV might be the concern then.  Edit away.  Cheers, --Plumbago 10:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Both are concerns.  This should present an accurate reflection of the content of the book, not dogma.  I will try to find time to edit soon.  --Richard Clegg 11:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm.  Watch out for weasel words.  To say that it received "some criticism" in the scientific press seems to somewhat understate things (to say the least).  The reviews I've read (the ones cited in the article) are very uncomplimentary towards the book, so I've reworded.  If you can find other (scientific press) reviews then that might help us tighten the wording somewhat.  Cheers, --Plumbago 12:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was a friendly review in scientific press which caused me to read it in the first place.  Can't remember where though.  Damned if I can find my copy of the book as well which is somewhat hampering me.  --Richard Clegg 12:38, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV