lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ode to a Banker

message: When Marcus Didius Falco gives a poetry reading for family and friends, things get a little out of hand. The event is taken over by Aurelius Chrysippus, a wealthy Greek banker and patron to a group of struggling writers, who subsequently offers to publish Falco's work, which Falco turns down as being a raw deal. Unfortunately, soon afterwards Chrysippus is brutally murdered and due to his presence at Chrysippus' sriptorium Falco is implicated in his death and forced by his friend Petronius Longus, the enquiry chief of the vigiles, to investigate. 
The result is a trawl through the literary and financial worlds of Ancient Rome. Falco's investigations eventually reveal many potential suspects, including disgruntled writers employed by Chrysippus, scriptorium and his business contacts, as well as his family: Chrisyppus' widow Vibia, his ex-wife Lysa and his son Diomedes. Meanwhile, things get worse: one of the suspected writers, Avienus, turns up dead and Falco and his friend Petronius are also attacked, although they manage to survive. To add insult to injury, Falco also faces problems with his own family: his estranged father Geminius has problems coping with the death of his mistress, Flora, and Falco's arch-nemesis Anacrites is slowly ingratiating himself with Falco's own mother.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.168.71.170 (talk) 06:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New plot summary
Talk:Benjamin F. Sands

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Natsubee 16:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Added military infobox and inserted data, Wikified existign material, added minor fixes, cats, etc. Page should now be in relatively good shape.Wikited (talk) 20:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page
Talk:Back to the Future (Not the Movie)

message: Seriously, "not the movie" is not encyclopedic - Occono. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.42.205.55 (talk) 14:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First thought of mine too, I think 'Back to the Future (Phil of the Future episode)' is the correct way. Trekker 00:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs to be renamed. 

message: At the end of the article you said "It is unknown if when they went back for him they decided to stay..." It should be "It is unknown if they went back for him or if they decided to stay..." You made mistakes with the word 'when' and you left out the word 'Or' Stewarefan 01:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake at the end
Category talk:2000s anime

message: Should we subcategorize these by specific years? For example, Category:Anime of 2000, Category:Anime of 2001, ...  and perhaps Category:Anime currently airing. One benefit of such filtering would be easier ability to find the most recent anime out of all in this decade. —Tokek 15:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this list is expected to get VERY VERY BULKY.  And apparently, it'll be a headache to arrange all this. KyuuA4 19:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've begun sorting them. Any help is appreciated. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, to start with, Haunted Junction is from the '90s, not the '00s. Also, Kikaida (character) is redundant, there's at least two other listings for the series itself (This link is also about the CHARACTER, not the anime). Rave Master: Special Attack Force is the game, NOT the anime, and has NO information about the anime. You may also think about not needing a separate listing for every single movie/special in a series, such as Case Closed or Naruto. Is the criteria Anime that is running in the decade, or that has STARTED in the decade? If the former, Pokemon needs to be added. These are just the ones I have handy. CFLeon (talk) 00:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If something is categorized in the wrong place, recategorize it or remove the category if the cat is just plain wrong. The criteria are listed at the top of each cat: Anime TV series, movies, and OVAs first released from 1 January 2000 through 31 December 2009. (for this cat, as an example, emphasis added) ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcategorize?

message: I've tried on several occasions to edit this page, since there are many mistakes: misdated series, games listed as tv shows, shows listed more than once, individual episodes listed and even non-existant shows, but it seems to be protected or something. At least, all I get is blank except for the category listing. Can someone explain this or check it out if an error? And if it's NOT a mistake, how can this list be corrected? CFLeon (talk) 03:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't a regular article (or an article at all). It's a category. If you want to remove (or add) an article from (to) this category, you must edit the article itself. You can do so by clicking on the link to the article listed here. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing?
Talk:Alis volat propriis

message: Top? A motto that next to no one knows in a foreign language next to no one knows, that is used for nothing and has at most some secondary symbolic value? I would put it at "Mid" at highest, and possibly "Low". Pardon my vehemence, please, but I have to question this. Does anybody have another opinion?  Ipoellet 23:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We put every "symbol of Oregon" in the Top importance. So state tree, flower, motto, etc. are all in there. It helps remove the subjective element to tagging for importance. Aboutmovies 00:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance assessment 

message: It would be great if somebody could help cleanup my referencing there. I can't seem to get it right! I also have no time to fix it atm, perhaps tomorrow. King256 10:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Aboutmovies 16:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing Help 

message: I removed the below reference because it doesn't talk about anything in the article. It does briefly mention the "Provisional Government" of 1844, but nothing about a vote for an provisional government independent of the US in 1843.

It's a good reference, so if the article talks about something in the reference (for example, early Oregon missionaries, the native Oregon tribes, or the beginnings of the Oregon education system), it would be great to use again. -kotra 18:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that was a mistake. Here's the diff. Sprkee? I put back the original reference of that sentence, which seems to back up the statement. Katr67 19:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: Actually, what's the meaning? Maikel (talk) 00:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning
Talk:Pilot (Scottish band)

message: Why don't you have this compilation listed? Leitmotiv (talk) 08:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Six years late, but the "Pilot" on that album is a different band (but with the same name).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bflaminio (talk • contribs) 04:46, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Music Compilation missing

message: I think in the U.S., they're basically considered "one-hit wonders"... AnonMoos (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Whilst in the UK, they are more like two-hit wonders. -- Beardo (talk) 21:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: US

message: I removed the Bay City Rollers saying "the connection is pretty weak". Someone reverted writing "There actually is no band more closely associated with them then BCR: Both boy bands with similar musical styles, both from the the same city in Scotland, both active during the exact same years, & some members were in both bands". 
Since Template:Infobox_musical_artist#associated_acts specifically says not to include "Groups that are merely similar" that removes most of the justifications. So we are left with two "substitute members" who played with Bay City Rollers before they became famous and did not record anything. Is that sufficient to make them associated ? -- Beardo (talk) 19:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out the BCR article:  Pilot is on there twice, including even their navbox.  And BCR is included in Pilot's navbox, all placed there by other editors. The guys in these bands all went to school together, and knew each other. You're overthinking this; let it go. - JGabbard (talk) 23:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Associated acts - Bay City Rollers 

message: Was the original recording ever released? Not in the US. Anywhere? Nicmart (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two’s A Crowd
Talk:Redcliffe, Bristol

message: Redcliffe is being rapidly redeveloped, with many new office buildings under construction. It is becoming a home to new technology businesses.
A good example is Jiva Technology Ltd, software and website developers, who are based in St Thomas Court, Thomas Lane opposite the historic St Thomas CofE Church.
Jiva Technology Ltd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.168.199 (talk) 18:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redevelopment and new technology businesses based in Redcliffe
Talk:Redfield, Bristol

message: ==Mapbox==
added mapbox and cleaned up a little, tagged for expansion. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: added image from commons. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Bulwark-class ship of the line

message: Propose renaming a couple of articles you started:
*Bulwark Class Battleship (1859) to Bulwark class battleship (1859)
*Duncan class (1859) to Duncan class battleship (1859)
When you get a chance, please let me know if this is appropriate. Thanks. Maralia 19:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Toddy1, I was just about to ask you about that, namely "would you have any objection to 'Bulwark class ship of the line (1859)' and 'Duncan class ship of the line (1859)'".  But I guess now that you wouldn't.  If that's ok with you, mind if I make the move? Kind regards, Benea 21:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm not opposed to 'Line of battle ship'.  Perhaps we could get some opinions from WP:Ships? Benea 21:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Forgive me, attempting to be brief, carpe diem and all that.  But since you mention it, the convention is not to use dashes in the article titles, hence Arrogant class ship of the line, Canada class ship of the line and Ramillies class ship of the line.  But we would refer to them in prose text as line-of-battle ship.  --Benea 21:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

text: It may be worth looking at this more generally, see the variety of terms used in Le Napoléon (1850) and HMS Agamemnon (1852). Angus McLellan  (Talk) 14:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renames
Talk:Manimuthar River (tributary of Thamirabarani)

message: I suggest that this be renamed to Manimutar or Manimuttar. Usage of the 'th' for this consonant is limited to some south Indian usage, and is confusing in all other contexts, including North Indian and non-Indian. Imc 17:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name spelling
Talk:St. Mary's Roman Catholic Church

message: Well, I've finished my tea, and here we are with the exact same three hastily created stub articles and 20 odd redlinks. Now, can we civilly discuss removing them? NipokNek 19:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can live with the new version. :) Thanks to whomever changed it. (I'm too lazy to look you up) NipokNek 22:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I really don't understand why it matters so much that this rule be enforced on what is obviously part of a very active Wikiproject, I can also live with this. IvoShandor 22:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It were me. We (the NRHP Wikiproject) have been creating these, b/c there's so much of this kind of thing on the National Register. You can see on the What links here link what I mean. This is one of the more serious ones, but there's lots others. Figure to at least create disambig pages for all these, since it's gonna be quite some time before there are even stubs for all these. It's not really critical, I guess, for the links to be there, as such. As long as the disambig page remains, that's the importantest thing. Cheers! :) --Ebyabe 23:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah the links don't matter, they can be added, but it would be foolish to remove this page. IvoShandor 04:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Six weeks later...
Talk:Papakura railway station

message: Article about all other train station in Auckland follow the convention of 'Train Station' following the name of the station, therefore I don't agree with the change of name. If a change of convention to 'Railway Station' is desired, this should be discussed first with the community. If such a change is accepted then we can all work to change all train station articles to follow the new convention. The reason why I originally created the articles using the word 'Train' is because thats the common usage in Auckland City. Furthermore the Auckland Regional Transport Authority use the term 'Train Station' instead of 'Railway Station'. James Pole 09:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The change has affected some complex templates which are dependant upon the names being consistent. Worldwide the agreed standard is "X railway station" (note the capitals), Auckland and previously Wellington used "X Train Station" but recently the Wellington moved to "X Railway Station" (note capitals). I can change the templates to reflect whatever the consensus is to have one or the other but i just need to know ;). Thus I've moved it back pending a consensus. Pickle 21:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The accepted standard is "x Railway Station" for all locations outside Auckland.  As the official name of Auckland's stations is "x Train Station", that's what we use.  See the NZR Manual of Style, which I'm going to move to the NZR WikiProject as soon as I figure out how! (Is moving a user subpage to a project subpage as easy as moving a regular page?) - Axver 02:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The only thing i was really getting at (other than be consistent whatever happens) was your choice of capitalisation is out of sync with the rest of the world. As for moving a page, I've never tried but worst case just copy and past. Pickle 13:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, nowhere else capitalises?  I'm honestly not fussed whether we do or don't.  As all the existing pages are capitalised and I see no tangible benefits from moving them all, I figure that no change is necessary.  That said, if someone else feels like doing all the work to bring our stations into line with the rest of the world, I wouldn't object! - Axver 13:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change
Talk:Thessaloniki International Film Festival

message: Please, proceed with the suggested merge. Hoverfish Talk 16:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: was redirected to here without merging any content, and then the page was deleted (DIFF). – wbm1058 (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge 

message: The title should be Thessaloniki International Film Festival, not International Thessaloniki Film Festival.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.103.214.130 (talk) 16:36, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Article Title

message: Thessaloniki Documentary Festival redirects here, but is not mentioned in the article. It seems to be a separate festival. I think the redirect should go to Festivals of Thessaloniki#Documentary Festival instead. TDF used to have its own article which was speedy deleted for whatever reason. TDF website --92.208.244.215 (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thessaloniki Documentary Festival? 
Talk:Panmure railway station, Auckland

message: The article badly needs an update and a new photo. I have today deleted significant content dating from 18 November 2012 that described future works. Almost all of those works have now been completed. The rebuilding of the platforms and shelters, the construction of the overhead plaza with escalators and stairs to platforms, the construction of the bus terminal on the overhead road, and the bypass roads. Unfortunately, references for opening dates seem to be nonexistent. The only one I could find was for an official opening by Mayor Len Brown on 20 January 2014 here, which has good interior and exterior video of the facility, but has an undue focus on the level of security provided for Mr Brown, and consequently I'm reluctant to use it. Akld guy (talk) 20:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update October 2016 

message: What was the justification of renaming this article from Panmure railway station, New Zealand to Panmure railway station, Auckland? Is there more than one Panmure railway station in New Zealand that needs disambiguation? Ajf773 (talk) 21:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name change
Talk:Rotterdam Ahoy

message: Ahoy' or Ahoy? Its official site does not seem to use the apostrophe. Anthony Appleyard 16:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Dutch article, the venue's name was written as Ahoy' Rotterdam until 2007, when the apostrophe disappeared. It doesn't cite a source, however. ―JochemvanHees (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Apostrophe?

message: I noticed that the Events section contains first a list of events, and then the next sentence is "The 1997 and 2016 MTV Europe Music Awards and the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2007 were also held in the Ahoy Arena." I was wondering why this isn't just included in the list? ―JochemvanHees (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Because its supposed to be for only notable sporting events. I'll update it now. Fort esc (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are the MTV EMA and JESC not included in the list of events? 

message: The lead says in 2016, but it doesn't cite a source. It looks like that info was added in 2017 in this edit by an anonymous user, but that IP address hasn't been active for a long time. I have been searching for the past two days for a source that confirms the statement, but I couldn't find anything. I do notice that older sources use the term "Sportpaleis" and newer ones use "Ahoy Arena", but never both. It may have something to do with Ahoy getting a new logo in January 2016, but the news articles about that don't mention either name. Does anyone have more info? ―JochemvanHees (talk) 22:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the Sportpaleis renamed to the Ahoy Arena?
Talk:Newmarket railway station, Auckland

message: * Agree with the proposal to merge Newmarket South and Newmarket West articles into this article. The stations are only temporary and will only exist for, at most, another year. It will also enable the correct spelling of Kingdon Street (not Kingdom) to be used. - Beeswaxcandle (talk) 00:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of Newmarket South and Newmarket West Temporary Stations into this article

message: Can we get a better photo than one of a train in the foreground blocking any decent image of the platform? Given the station has now been demolished a fair use image of the original station would be justified. JRG (talk) 03:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would disagree. There is little pressing need for a photo of the old station, so we should instead hunt around for one that is available under an acceptable license.Ingolfson (talk) 06:58, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

text: PS: I think I actually have some, though they aren't necessarily great. I will check. Ingolfson (talk) 06:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Uploaded, see below. As I said, they aren't great sadly. Use if you see fit. Maybe at some later stage with an expanded article. Ingolfson (talk) 08:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Embarcadero Circle

message: I have boldly merged/redirected this information to Embarcadero (San Diego). This project is too trivial to have its own page, as evidenced by its lack of sources, and can be better described as part of the overall Embarcadero. --MelanieN (talk) 14:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Penrose railway station, Auckland

message: "The Onehunga Branch is single-track with no south-going junction at Penrose..." I keep reading this, but can't make sense of "no south-going junction." Is there perhaps a clearer way to describe what is meant by this in the article? Is it simply meant that there is no wye track connecting it to the North Auckland Line in the southern direction? Criticalthinker (talk) 08:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description
Talk:Boston Road railway station

message: "The St Peter's College station attained full public station status with all trains stopping there from 1993 and was named the Boston Road Station." (as at 4 November 2014)
I can't cite anything (perhaps someone who collects timetables can), but my memory of this differs. I attended the school from 1996-2000 and remember that there was only a platform on the school side and that only two trains in and two (later more) trains out stopped there in '96.
I'm not sure of dates but this eventually expanded to all AM inbound trains and all PM outbound trains up until the second platform was built in 1997 when all the west line's station platforms were extended for four-car trains, it was only then that all trains stopped at Boston Rd. On the side, before 1997 I don't think the station had any lighting.
Awnz1 (talk) 04:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Awnz1, Thanks for your contribution.. I am responsible for the statement. The whole history of the Boston Rd station as expressed in this article was originally in the St Peter's College, Auckland wikipedia article. I moved it all into the station article because the SPC article was too long. When it was in the SPC article, the statement had the following reference: Sean Millar, Railway Stations of Auckland's Western Line: Boston Road to Waitakere before the 2004 upgrade programme, 2nd edition, Sean Millar, Huia, 2007, p. 4. I will add it to the station article now. But you could perhaps check the reference (AucklandPublic Library will surely have the publication) and correct the statement and/or the reference if you feel it is necessary.Rick570 (talk) 6:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I may make that a wee trip to the library to do during the next time it's quiet at work. 58.28.159.33 (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever.Rick570 (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date that more / all trains started to use the station
Talk:Maungawhau railway station

message: The Wikipedia page states that Maungawhau will be opening in 2026, but neither of the sources provided on the page actually state that. There are recent signs on the western line that label Maungawhau station as re-opening in 2024, even thought the entire CRL would open in 2026. Can anyone find anything more concrete about this? --Prosperosity (talk) 04:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Reopening date
Talk:Hornet's Nest (novel)

message: "The creator of Kay Scarpetta, the most fascinating character in contemporary crime fiction, now cunningly reveals the heart and soul of a metropolitan police department. With Charlotte as her simmering background, she propels us into the core of the force through the lives of a dynamic trio of heroes: Andy Brazil, an ambitious young reporter for The Charlotte Observer and an eager--sometimes too eager--volunteer cop; Police Chief Judy Hammer, the professionally strong yet personally troubled guardian of Charlotte's law and order; and her deputy chief, Virginia West, a genuine head-turner who is married to her job. To walk the beat with Hammer, West, and Brazil is to learn the inner secrets of police work--the tensions and the tedium, the hilarity and the heartbreak, the unexpected pump of adrenaline and the rush of courage that can lead to heroics...or death." Arcanicus (talk) 00:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Direct Quote from Publisher's Web Site