Talk:Euphoria (programming language)

message: Euphoria uses 31-bit values for integers NOT 32 and this fact is stated repeatedly throughout the official documentation. The 32nd bit designates it as an integer instead of an atom. This is NOT a typo so don't correct this. - DNewhall 
Euphoria can, of course, handle 32+bit integers in its atom data type.
- 32+bit isn't entirely accurate.  Euphoria can only support 31bit integers, and 64-bit double precision floats.  The mantissa is 52-bits. OpenEuphoria probably inherits this limitation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.90.2.142 (talk) 05:44, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on integer size 

message: Am I missing something here?  The article seems to be written by someone who is unaware that programming language development continued after the creation of C.  There's a lot of bragging that Euphoria doesn't require pointer or array management and doesn't have static typing, and that's great, but that applies to a wide variety of languages used today.
I see that despite using the term "object" rather liberally, there seem to be no OO facilities at all.  I also can't find anything on built-in hash/dictionary support, besides using an enum to index an array.  Comparing a scripting language to C is all well and good, but what makes Euphoria better than, say, Python or another dynamic language?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.116.103 (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the big deal? 

message: Since the switch from Geshi to Pygments for syntax highlighting (phab:T85794), support for 'euphoria' was unfortunately dropped, which was used only once on this page.  The highlighting on this page is manually added.  If you want specialised 'euphoria' syntax highlight support again, it will need to be added to Pygments.   Alternatively, if there is another language which has similar syntax, we can add that as a fallback. John Vandenberg (chat) 21:11, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  euphoria syntax highlighting lost 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Euphoria (programming language). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716180721/http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/esearch.exu?fromMonth=9&fromYear=7&toMonth=9&toYear=7&keywords=atari to http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/esearch.exu?fromMonth=9&fromYear=7&toMonth=9&toYear=7&keywords=atari
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716180705/http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/esearch.exu?fromMonth=A&fromYear=B&toMonth=A&toYear=B&keywords=oct+18+1%3A19 to http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/esearch.exu?fromMonth=A&fromYear=B&toMonth=A&toYear=B&keywords=oct+18+1%3A19
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716180757/http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/esearch.exu?fromMonth=3&fromYear=3&toMonth=3&toYear=3&keywords=13%3A04 to http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/esearch.exu?fromMonth=3&fromYear=3&toMonth=3&toYear=3&keywords=13%3A04
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509094445/http://www.usingeuphoria.com/ to http://www.usingeuphoria.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified