Talk:Stay Hungry (album)

message: :Image:Twister Sister - Stay Hungry.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Twister Sister - Stay Hungry.jpg

message: If anyone wants to beef up this stub, there is great material at
[here] and [here].  Good stuff includes the "Stay Hungry" title was inspired by Arnold Schwarzenegger and Schwarzenegger used the lead song "We're Not Gonna Take It" in his campaign for governor. MrYdobon (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Material Worth Adding

message: I feel as though this article should be merged into Stay Hungry. It has no real significance other than the fact it's a re-recorded version of the aforementioned album. The contents include only release facts, track listing, personnel, one review link, and nothing else. Stay Hungry, on the other hand, has much more information and significance put on its page.
My point is that it's quality is not that great. There's a deluxe edition too. Why not make that an article? Why not give all tracks an article? Why not make an article for the remixed/remastered versions of Megadeth's Capitol releases? They're all a little different compared to the originals, so why not further inform about them? Well, for the same reason, they don't have the amount of significance or key information as the original album(s). Therefore, I fail to see why this release needs an article when only minor significance/new information and or good quality exists. JRC3 (talk) 7:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This Album is different from the original Stay Hungry, the title is different, the cover art is different, the songs are re-recorded years later, a true S.M.F. can hear the differences, and there are 7 more tracks on this album than the original. -- Just a proud S.M.F.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.50.123 (talk) 06:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: These are not musical instruments.If they were then you have to include every single person of every single live album there ever was in the personnel section. Think before you write, idiots.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:554E:7801:D069:DE1D:E4F8:C3ED (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  sound effects, handclapping