lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Walter Lindrum

message: I'm rating this article at B and think it has potential as a good article candidate. First, however, it needs inline citations, with page numbers cited for each reference or so. It also could use more than one reference if one could be found. It's a nice article.
--Bookworm857158367 01:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I said something similar at /Comments here. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 01:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some citations and some other sources. - Nick C 18:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Verra nahce.  — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 02:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Is the part about "regularly making breaks of over 1000" a typo or were they using a different scoring system back then? In the latter case, an explanation would be nice.
62.178.87.193 08:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, and yes to an extent, respectively. In English billiards you can score by potting and/or by .  Good point though. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 22:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1000+ breaks?

message: The "greatest player" bit in the lead, even with a source, is a major WP:NPOV problem, as explained (about a different article, but exact same issue) here in great detail.  The problem is that is, despite having one or more secondary, vague source that "lots of people" say this about him, it does not quote anyone in particular as actually saying this, much less anyone so notable for their position in the activity this article subject engaged in that our readers should take their word for it (contrast the lead of Michael Jordan, which quotes the NBA itself as saying he's the best ever so far). This article is unlikely to pass WP:GAN until this is fixed. In fact, as much as I like this article, I'd oppose its promotion to WP:GA myself. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 11:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why people feel compelled to add things like "greatest player" ever. I always feel that sort of thing detracts from articles since you would never see that in a real encyclopedia. Even quotes about players being the best shouldn't be in the lede in my opinion. A good article should be able to stand on its own. Kcchief915 (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually agree, but I believe that superlative comments can actually be added, under policy, if they are done so very carefully.  I don't like them, but I wasn't going to say, above, that they can never be added even with appropriate sourcing and contextual balance, because I can't find anything in WP policy that says so. :-)  — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 01:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Greatest player" 
Talk:Luís I of Portugal

message: What became of Carlos August, the child born in 1874 in Lisbon ? Any info available regarding his mother ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Windemere (talk • contribs) 13:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article mentions the British Ultimatum being made during Luis I's reign, however it was made January 11, 1890, 3 months after he died. Should it even be mentioned in this article? Paris1127 (talk) 12:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Ultimatum 

message: Although saying King Luís I belonged to the House of Braganza isn’t totally wrong, he actually belonged to the House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. This branch was created when Queen Maria II (Braganza) married the German prince Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. All Portuguese monarchs descended from them belonged to the House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha Royal Braganza (talk) 14:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
Talk:The New Book of Knowledge

message: Opening sentence
I'm not sure that the opening sentence makes sense:
"The New Book of Knowledge is an encyclopedia intended primarily for children from 3rd to 8th grades and also adults.[1]"
How can the books be intended "primarily" for young children and adults? Also, the reference [1] doesn't seem to mention anything about adult readers.
Dan20001 (talk) 10:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The New Book of Knowledge was published in the UK, possibly by Harmsworth, in the 1940s, in 10 vols.  Two supplements covering the war were later released.  Whether the US book is a version of the UK book or just a coincidental naming I have no ides. Rich Farmbrough, 04:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: UK publication

message: No copies since 2010, no pop culture reference, nothing notable besides who made it. Should we delete this? New3400 (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this needed
Talk:New Concept English

message: 地方  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.2.103.4 (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  方法 

message: Page 156 exercise 1 105.112.113.27 (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:List of Revolutionary Girl Utena characters

message: In the series he reveals his name to be a parallel of Lucifer, and in my own researching of the language I have found this to be accurate.  If someone can find a good way to fix and site that, it'd be appreciated, as my grasp of wiki code is weak at best.  24.164.21.57 (talk) 20:51, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistranslation of Akio's name 

message: I just went through a decent amount but this still needs work. There is far too much fancruft and repetition on this page, and much of the "information" falls into the realm of personal interpretation. Likewise, Wikipedia is not a fansite. Let the linked character shrines analyze individual events, just put down facts. Katsuhagi 03:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Cleanup needed 

message: As they are the main characters of the series, I believe they should have their own pages. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 16:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely think that both characters could have their own pages. There's already a lot of info on Wikipedia on how the show was created and developed, which could be used for their "Development" sections. And I'm sure there probably a few sources, including academic ones, discussing the characters in terms of their gender, sexuality, and in Anthy's case, morality. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 16:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

text: This doesn't need to be a formal proposal; if you think the characters should have their own articles, you can just WP:BEBOLD and do it. Morgan695 (talk) 17:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthy and Utena
Talk:Chidham and Hambrook

message: The article has never been a B, this was more of a correction. Main faults are no citations and wiki-links stop happening halfway down the page. MortimerCat (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Downgrade from B to Start

message: From what I can gather from the article, it appeared to be a private residence. In my opinion the pictures looked too invasive. There is nothing specifically notable about the building - Grade II does not make it notable especially as there are 17 others in the area - so I have removed the section. MortimerCat (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Old Rectory
Talk:John Leighton Stuart

message: How is that irony? Wen was praised by Communists for his works. Does is it directly mean Communists agree with Wen's particular view on Stuart? Besides, the Communists view on Mao Zedong isn't stable either and he criticized Stuart. There are many factors to consider why a reference to him is not printed. The word "irony" is often misused. --2.245.133.183 (talk) 23:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Activities - last sentence 

message: Why do people do this sort of thing?
“ The book was finished and published by officials of the U.S. State Department to advance a hard line, anti-Communist political agenda, and the angry, pugnacious tone of the book's latter chapters betray Stuart's self-effacing modesty and patrician voice evident in the first six chapters”
…except the citation given is to the existence of his book, not support for the proposition. It is either that people aren’t caring or that they are actively working to disinform. That is not what Wikipedia is for.
Kah13 (talk) 02:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation that doesn’t support previous material
Talk:Mohammad Hashem Cheshti

message: This article was written originally by myself. Subsequently to this it must have made its way into other websites. Not unusual for Wikipedia. FWIW the article and the site referred to both were created in 2003. Refdoc (talk) 11:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrights

message: I have added sources for all I could find right now, taking care to avoid circular references to articles which quote the Wikipedia article. Refdoc (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:The New Oxford Book of Carols

message: I'm pretty sure this book was reviewed in the Observer by Anthony Burgess.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.152.31 (talk) 19:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthony Burgess
Talk:Sultan Ahmad Khan

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Ahmed Jan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 7#Ahmed Jan until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ahmed Jan" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 
Talk:Lương Chí Dũng

message: Should this article actually be Dung Luong Chi?  Sources?  Westerns sports stats listings very often get Asian names backwards (i.e. they put the family name last like they would with a European name). — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 05:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His name needs diacritics. Badagnani 06:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Ya'qub ibn al-Layth al-Saffar

message: I removed this sentence:
He was either Khawraji or Shia 
: 1. In different sources he is called Sunni, Shi'a, Khawarij and his sect is obscure.
: 2. He is a national hero for both Iranians and Afghans and his religion is not that much important.
--behmod talk 00:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yaqub's Religion

message: "First, the Saffarid amirs and maliks were rulers of Persian stock who for centuries championed the cause of the underdog against the might of the Abbasid caliphs." -- Savory, Roger M.. "The History of the Saffarids of Sistan and the Maliks of Nimruz (247/861 to 949/1542-3)." The Journal of the American Oriental Society. 1996. HighBeam Research. (September 3, 2012). 
"The provincial Persian Ya'kub, on the other hand, rejoiced in his plebeian origins, denounced the Abbasids as usurpers, and regarded both the caliphs and such governors from aristocratic Arab families as the Tahirids with contempt". -- Ya'kub b. al-Layth al Saffar, C.E. Bosworth, The Encyclopaedia of Islam, Vol. XI, p 255. --Defensor Ursa 18:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persian ethnicity
Talk:Aino Sibelius

message: There was a Mergeto tag on this page, suggesting merging with Jean Sibelius. It was dated November 2006 and there has been no discussion about it on the linked talkpage in the intervening months. I have now amplified this article and consider that the idea of a merge is no longer relevant, so I have removed the Mergeto tag. - Euchiasmus 09:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion to merge with Jean Sibelius

message: I wonder if she is notable enough for an article.  She can’t acquire notability from her parents, siblings or spouse.  She was a devoted wife and mother, and no doubt a lovely person, but is that enough?  She is credited as co-writer for 3 books, but they all seem to be about Sibelius and it’s likely she had a very minor role to play as far as the writing goes. These do not make her a recognised author, and we don’t have her in any writing categories.  
Had she never married Sibelius, nobody would ever have heard of her.  US First Ladies etc, like it or not, do become notable in their own right by virtue of who they marry.  The same is not true of composers and their spouses. 
Just thinking about some other composers’ spouses/partners whose names are generally known to the musical world, and for whom we have separate articles:
* J.S. Bach: Anna Magdalena Bach
* Berlioz: Harriet Smithson
* Leonard Bernstein: Felicia Montealegre
* Britten: Peter Pears
* Chopin: George Sand
* Delius: Jelka Rosen
* Elgar: Caroline Alice Elgar
* Grieg: Nina Hagerup
* Liszt: Cosima Wagner
* Mahler: Alma Mahler
* Mozart: Constanze Mozart
* Rossini: Isabella Colbran
* Schumann: Clara Schumann
* Richard Strauss: Pauline de Ahna
* Tchaikovsky: Antonina Miliukova 
With two exceptions (Constanze Mozart and Antonina Milyukova), these ladies and 1 gentleman all achieved notability in their chosen fields.  In some cases they became better known and had more successful careers because of their association with the composer, but they still achieved things outside of that.  
I note that the following do not have articles: 
* Bartok: Ditta Pasztory (deserves an article)
* Rachmaninoff: Natalia Satina (does not deserve an article)
So, I’m really struggling to get a sense of Aino Sibelius’s notability.  I suggest it be merged with her husband’s article.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 00:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge redux
Talk:Shah Mahmud Khan

message: Shah mahmud had ruled under Zahir Shah only. Nadir Shah at Monarch section of infobox can be removed. --Vssun (talk) 11:52, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monarch @ Infobox 
Talk:Ajmal Shams

message: This article does not cite any sources. It also needs a lot of copy edit and Wikifications. Tājik (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  accuracy 
Talk:Zrbtt

message: The content of this article has been merged into Blowing a raspberry  Jeepday 21:55, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it hasn't.  The article is still very much there, and the Articles for Deletion discussion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zrbtt) is still open for comments.  Will it survive AfD and get merged?  Perhaps.  That's for the user base to decide.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The content of this article is edited into the article Blowing a raspberry , so if it should not survive Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zrbtt the closing admin need only to redirect Zrbbt to Blowing a raspberry .  You are correct that the content of the article Zrbtt is still in place pending survival of the AfD.  Jeepday 16:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ehsanullah Ehsan

message: Mullah Ehsanullah Ehsan, who was the chairman of the Taliban's Central Bank, was killed in Mazar-e-Sharif in 1997 (see Ahmed Rashid's Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, p.101, as well as 1. The current Taliban spokesperson is a different guy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.54.82.141 (talk) 13:07, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This user is correct. The book does state Ehsan died in Mazar-e-Sharif in 1997, and therefore, the spokesman must be a different person. --Aamsse talk to me 04:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Different guy

message: I stated above that this article contains information of two different individuals, and I also included a source. Thus, it needs to be split into two separate articles. --Aamsse talk to me 21:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Alexei Lvov

message: Originally the father's-name must be not Fyodorovich, but Feodorovich. During Lvov's lifetime this name never was writen as Фёдорович, but as Фeодорович. The letter ё officially exists only from ~1918. Gerea-en 21:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Margaret Simey

message: I started this biographical page as I believe Margaret Simey to be a major figure in British equality rights for 20th century. All the major broadsheet newspapers ran obits on her, but I'm reluctant to use any of them as it might be construed as plagiarism, and my own knowledge of her relates largely to the contacts she had, while a teenager, with Elsie J. Oxenham - surely a transient and rather trivial thing to be the only reason for her appearance in Wikipedia, though not many people can claim to have been depicted as a minor character in her own right, with the book she appears in dedicated to her, and to have two major fictional characters in a series of nearly 40 books based on her! 
Can't someone else come up with more details of her adult life?? Any Liverpudlians out there who could help??? --Abbeybufo 21:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Matvey Kazakov

message: Hello!  Please note that I've placed questions/issues in hidden comments within the article text, labeled COPYEDITOR'S NOTES.  Thanks!  Galena11 17:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit
Talk:Royal Canadian Air Cadet Training

message: Hi Quadra,
It looks like you've used a slightly older version of the page as a start point for the split. I don't know if this was intentional... just giving you a heads up. Sancho McCann 22:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I'm not sure that leaving it all in one place will get too out of hand. I've taken a look at the Wikipedia:The perfect article and Wikipedia:Article size articles and they seem to motivate keeping this information together in one location. The training is a large part of what each of the program is. Without describing the training in the root article, we might not be providing an encyclopedic angle on every aspect of the subject. Anyway, these are just some thoughts. I am interested to see what you have in mind though for the split though. Oh, I also submitted the Royal Canadian Air Cadets page for a peer review yesterday, maybe they'll say something about the length to help inform our decision. Sancho McCann 22:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The idea is to cover each of the summer courses in detail, along with the Levels program - the sort of detail that should be available, but would drag down the main article, which deals with the entirety of the program, including history, administration, funding, traditions, etc. Quadra 03:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah... so were you planning on leaving the same level of detail regarding training as is currently on the main page, but having more detailed information on this training page? Sancho McCann 06:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting 
Talk:CHF

message: The link for Critical Heat Flux is broken (writing "Critical heat flux" will make it work without much pain). The last sentence about chaos theory has nothing to do here as this is a disambiguation page. Any comment of this type should be written on the Critical heat flux article itself.
:If it's broke, fix it! :) Cadby (talk) 21:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :CHF (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#CHF (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 16:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "CHF (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Mohammad Musa Shafiq

message: S&B TRUST is totally non profit organisation. One day i was standing outside shaheen and 1 boy came towards me and asked me that i am not having money i have to pay my sister school fees if u dont believe me u can take my ID card and get all information regarding me. He told me when i was of 6 my father passed away. my mother was working in few houses and make money but now she is not able to work so i want ur help so that day i felt that i should start non profit organisation in which we can help needy people. So after that i talked to some of my university friends about this and they were happy to be a part of this non profit organisation. It is based in Islamabad.
REGARDS
MIAN HUNAIN SHAFI
0303-5225438
https://www.facebook.com/charityseetheneednotthecause/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mianhunainshafi (talk • contribs) 20:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  S&B TRUST 
Talk:Aamir Latif

message: I Can't find a source where it says Aamir latif was the governor of Faryab, though i have a source of the governors of Faryab who don't list him:
http://www.afghan-bios.info/tinc?key=2vB1wwzV&session_currentpage=index&session_mode=guest&formname=afghan_bios&session_searchcriteria=faryab&session_sortby=field_3&userid=1279016382;342197;396&session_nextpage=data_edit&session_offset=50&session_start=1&session_dbkey=1255250100;699622;920_afghan_bios&dbkey=1255250100;699622;920_afghan_bios
I've deleted Aamir Latif of the list of governors of Faryab. Maybe this article should also be deleted? Or can somebody find a source where he is named as governor? Diedtc (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 10:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Was Aamir Latif really Governor of Faryab?
Talk:Devil Anse Hatfield

message: Is anyone here related to the Hatfields?
:Yes, I am. I'm a direct descendant of Joseph Hatfield (d. 1832) the Rev War veteran, through an uncle of Anderson Hatfield's. My line had moved west to southern Indiana by the time the feud started and they had no part in it. They were still an ornery bunch, however. If you're connected yourself (whoever you are . . .), there's a very active Hatfield maillist covering all the dozen of so Hatfield families in this country -- not all of which are related to the feuding line. I have a large-ish genealogy website that gives everything I know about my own Hatfield descent. --Michael K. Smith 18:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: removed the following from the article Kiwaiti 07:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance 

message: At the moment there's a dearth of information on Hatfield; surely we can add more about his activities during the infamous feud?!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs more biography

message: The article says "Hatfield was baptized on September 23, 1911 in Island Creek and converted to Christianity." This is unclear. What was his religion before this? I wouldn't expect he'd have been an atheist in the mid-19th century. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 20:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing. Was he never baptized? Did he become "born again" following the feud? I would think he was always at least nominally Christian, even if it appears he had a hard time holding to the tenets of the faith for most of his life. 70.172.215.165 (talk) 09:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The West Virginia Hatfields were mostly evangelical Protestant, at least "on paper." How much they practiced is another matter. Some of the family were more religious than others, as is true in all families. Anderson supposedly "got religion" in his old age, also not uncommon, . . . though I suspect he was a good deal more cynical than that. Anyway, "conversion" is the term often used a century ago to describe this sudden rediscovery of religious belief. You see it in obits from that period all the time. --Michael K SmithTalk  23:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "converted to Christianity"? 

message: The image portrayed here is a photoshopped image of Hatfield’s face on another man’s body. 2600:8804:85F4:4100:40CF:D08C:447B:19B5 (talk) 21:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  False photo
Talk:Abdul Kabir

message: On December 14, 2010, User:Iqinn removed material from this article with the edit summary
remove confusing out of context primary source interpretation.  There is no "interpretation" in this passage.  Policy does not disallow using primary sources, it just says they should be used carefully.  Geo Swan (talk) 18:45, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation 