lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Monard railway station

message: This title has, for the past decade, stated (in effect) that "a station by this name doesn't exist, nor does the settlement it was/is intended to serve". If or when this station is developed (or at the very least moved beyond a "theory only" existence) then the title can be split to stand-alone again. Until then the two concepts (the planned town and its planned station) are inextricably linked. And, per WP:MERGEREASON are best covered in the same article. Otherwise this is just a pointless CFORK. Which describes a near "catch 22" scenario: "the station doesn't exist, and neither does the town. The town will not exist until the station does"..... Guliolopez (talk) 14:59, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Matteo Palmieri

message: Having corrected the sentence "He also was among the earliest to recognize differences between the Classical age of Greece and Rome and the European Middle Ages" for grammar, I must now question its factual basis. Is this so? Who says? Axel 16:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaissance scholar in the house? 

message: "The poem was unpublished in his lifetime, and upon its appearance in print was condemned by the Church as heretical, thus after his death Palmieri's body was removed from the Church of San Pier Maggiore and an effigy of him was burned." - cited to "Palmieri, Matteo" in the Encyclopedia of the Renaissance. 
A Descriptive and historical catalogue of the pictures in the National Gallery from 1906 says after inquisition the book was declared innocuous, but by then "inaccurate and extravagant reports" of Palmieri's heresy had spread widely. "For a minute account of the posthumous persecution of the author, and the circumstances which attended it, see Padre Gius Richa, Notizie istoriche delle Chiese foirentine, etc., Firenese, 1754, Tom. I. Lezione XI, and for a more recent survey of the whole question, an article by Diego Angelu in the Archivio Storico deli' Arte for 1896, p. 58." 
I know nothing about it myself. Is there any question the work was condemned as heretical? Tom Harrison Talk 01:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heresy? 

message: The article states that Palmieri was originally buried in San Pier Maggiore. That wikipage used to redirect to San Pier Maggiore, Pistoia and is now a DAB page which covers San Pier Maggiore, Florence as well.
As a Florentine I would guess that he was buried in the later, but I guess wikipedia isn't the place for guessing, so could anyone that knows or has access to the cited source check/clarify - either here for me to change, or in the article?
Tia
Icarusgeek (talk) 09:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was he originally buried?
Talk:Jewish Kalam

message: I don't believe the articles should be merged.  The Kalam article is substantial enough to stand on its own, and I will hopefully be making further additions in the future.  We don't need to merge everything into a single omniscient "Everything Jewish" article.  If the Judaeo-Islamic page wants to reference the Kalam page as a main subject page, that's of course fine. —Dfass 11:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But is there much more on the Judeo-Islamic page beyond this philosophy of Judaised Kalam?  Jheald 11:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I am going to remove the Merge tag.  It's been there for two years, and no good arguments for the merge have been forthcoming.  Thanks. —Dfass (talk) 14:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No merge 

message: David Ibn Merwan Al-Mukammas is listed under the category of Rabbinite practicioners of Kalam, but his own Wikipedia page implies several times that he was a Karaite and never claims he was a Rabbinite. 69.118.3.165 (talk) 21:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The doctrines of the Bahshamiyyites, was written between 1141 CE and 1276 CE by Taqî al-Dîn al-Bahrânî. This text illustrates the influence of Abû l-Husayn had on theological reasoning of Imâmî Shî'a from the 12th century forward. The study of Jewish Mu'tazilism (Jewish Kalam) began only within the last 150 years with the works of Schreiner and Munk. Schreiner and Munk, however, were not aware of the primary sources to be found among the various Genizah materials that Moshe Gil and others have found. Recent studies of Jewish Mu'tazilism were written by Harry Austryn Wolfson in Repercussions of the Kalam in Jewish Philosophy, and Georges Vajda writings regarding Yûsuf al-Basîr. Sarah Stroumsa published the 'Ishrûn Maqâla of the 9th century Jewish mutakallim David Ibn Marwan al-Mukammas .  Mukammas, at worst, was on the fence between Qarait and Rabbanit, at best a leading proponent of Sa'adya Gaon's Kalam which came to be known as "Jewish Kalam".  Jimharlow99 (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small contradiction
Talk:Benin Premier League

message: Can any experienced editor assess this article to confirm whether it is a fully professional league or not. Nigeria Premier League is a fully professional league per WP:FPL and I think the Benin Premier League is equivalent to the Nigeria Premier League but why it is concerning is that it was not listed at WP:FPL. Any help on this? Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 22:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Help
Talk:Pierre d'Arc

message: According to the last paragraph in the "Life" section Pierre has traceable descendants in the 2000s. The "Legacy" section meanwhile claims there are no known descendants. 91.130.26.108 (talk) 19:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably, it is a confusion between Pierre and Joan, where it was reported Joan had no children. Sinking into reality (talk) 11:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: But it specifically says in both that it's talking about Pierre's descendants. No one's claiming anything about Joan having children. 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:E882:A24B:124D:581E (talk) 18:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That implies the sources are from Joan's father. Sinking into reality (talk) 23:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information?
Talk:Genome Research

message: The ISSNs, web and print are very displaced, looks like it is a problem inside the infobox, please fix it. --84.44.176.12 (talk) 00:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout of ISSNs 

message: Having moved content from :File:ImpactFactorChart GenomeResearch.png to this article, history of the file has been provided below to support author traceability. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impact factor content history 

message: The addition of historical impact factor content was almost immediately deleted as not being appropriate content by the guidelines of the Academic Journals WikiProject. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of content
Talk:Gö Lotsawa Zhönnu-pel

message: The current version of this article has:
Please! This is mixing two entirely different people together - the 11th century 'gos khug pa lhas btsas, (TBRC P3458) a student of Atisha who was famously critical of the Nyingma tradition; and Gö Lotsawa ('gos lo ts'a ba gzhon nu dpal) ( b. 1392 d. 1481 ) TBRC P318 the famous author of the Blue Annals who was a student of  the fifth Karmapa and Tsongkhapa - and a teacher if the 6th Karmapa 
Gö Lotsawa's Blue Annals is cited as one of the sources for this article - and since Gö Lotsawa writes about the much earlier Gö Khugpa in that book, the mistake should have been obvious to anyone who had read it. Unfortunately this kind of sloppiness seems to plague the Tibetan Buddhism related articles on Wikipedia. 
As it is, the article is currently in a real mess with statements about two entirely different figures mixed together. This needs to be untangled. 
Chris Fynn (talk) 04:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Chris: I have just had a brief look at your notes and the article on Gö Lotsawa and it does look like you are right that I made a serious error last year when I combined information on the two men. I don't know yet how this happened, but the main thing is to correct the errors. I will do my best to sort the whole mess out over the next couple of days and will let you know when I have completed it so you can check the corrections or make any other suggestions you might have. So sorry for all the confusion. Oh, and thanks for picking up on the error - it will be good to get it all corrected! Sincerely, John Hill (talk) 09:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Chris: I have started on the rewrite of this article and also created a new one for Gö Khugpa. Please do have a look at them both - they are just beginnings - and please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions. Cheers and thanks, John Hill (talk) 17:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the same as '''gos khug pa lhas btsas''!
Talk:Ryan Ebanks

message: This is a vanity page, most likely created by the originator for self-promotion purposes.  Merely his amateur sports record is not encyclopedia-worthy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.168.64 (talk • contribs) 
WP:LOWPROFILE
WP:WIALPI
This page should be removed.  The athlete in question is low profile and this is either a vanity page or an outdated stub.  Given the datedness and lack of significance the article should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.127.231.226 (talk) 06:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kos (unit)

message: I think that this is meant to say 2 vitastas, not 4. Just thinking about it as you read it indicates there's definitely a mistake there since human anatomy can't have changed that much since 2500BC! I'm not going to change this now but hope it gets resolved by someone else soon. Donama 02:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Obvious incorrect information on Vitasta

message: The source is a geocities page, whose source is an annotation in an Internet publication of verse 5 of chapter 69 of book 3 (Aranya Kanda) of an ancient Indian epic poem/story (Ramayana, which has over 500 chapters spread over 7 books). The summary of ancient Indian units is given by the translators/annotators as follows:
:The Ancient Indian measures for distance, as per Kautilya's Artha Shaastra, a republication of Penguin are: 1 angula = 3/4 of present day inch; 4 angula-s = dharnugraha [bow grip]= 3 in; 8 angula-s = 1 dhanurmuSTi [fist with thumb raised]= 6 in; 12 angula-s = 1 vitasta [span-distance of stretched out palm between the tips of a person's thumb and little finger]= 9 in; 4 vitasta-s = 1 aratni / hasta [cubit]= 18 in; 4 aratni-s = 1 danDa / dhanus [bow]= 6 ft; 10 danDa-s = 1 rajju = 60 ft; 2 rajju-s = 1 paridesha = 120 ft; 2000 dhanus-s = 1 krosa / goruTa = 4000 yards or 2 1/4 miles, nearly 3.66 km; 4 krosa-s = 1 yojana = 9 miles, nearly 15 km; and this being so, the British revenue measured a yojana as a 5 mile distance and Chambers and Oxfords has this 5 mile figure in their dictionaries, while traditionally a yojana is said as a distance of 10 miles.
Those translators/annotators are credited as: 
:...translated and presented by Sri Desiraju Hanumanta Rao (Bala, Aranya and Kishkindha Kanda ) and Sri K. M. K. Murthy (Ayodhya and Yuddha Kanda) with contributions from Durga Naaga Devi and Vaasudeva Kishore (Sundara Kanda); Smt. Desiraju Kumari; Smt. K. Rajeswari...
None of this would be considered properly verifiable by the Wikipedia guidelines (see WP:RELY). I am removing this source from the page and adding a notice about the lack of references. --Donama 02:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad source/reference -- would violate [[WP:RELY]] guideline

message: I have tried to improve this article
* neatly organise the info under subheadings
* Info box added
* added references to the Arthsashtra english translation with specific page number. Feel free to add more robust references
* conversion to SI units (km) and imperial units (miles) added but it still needs reference improvement (not to my own satisfaction yet). Please help with this, by finding more reputed and acceptable conversion standards with reliable references. If you make changes to this section then do not forget to edit info box also.  
Thanks
Being.human (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:36, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements
Template talk:Irish Festivals

message: Is there really any need for the flag? I don't think it adds much. beano (talk) 12:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's for non-political purposes to demonstrate that the festivals included are from across the four provinces. --➨Candlewicke  :) Sign/Talk  19:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic
Talk:Farsi (disambiguation)

message: The OED under "Farsi" has:
: a. = "Parsee" 2.    b. The Persian name for the modern Persian language; cf. "Persian" n. 2. Also attrib. or as adj.
--dab (𒁳) 16:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is correct. CyrusTheGreat2 (talk) 06:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Morbid obesity

message: If Morbid obesity is going to redirect to obesity then obesity needs to be defined.  Mathiastck 02:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Morbidity is actually a more useful place to redirect the term.  Mathiastck 02:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagreed. The key term here is "obesity". `'Míkka>t 19:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

text: As noted, the key term is "obesity." The term "morbid obesity" refers to a subset of the term "obesity." Since this redirect was last edited almost a decade ago the article on obesity has certainly changed and the requested definitions of "obesity" and "morbid obesity" are now located there. I changed the redirect to obesity. Consideration may be given to modifying the redirect to obesity#classification or classification of obesity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by El piel (talk • contribs) 16:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Tildonk

message: i worked on copy/editing and fixing the bad grammar i found in this page. i also tagged it incase i missed some other mistakes. i have 3 suggestions for someone more knowledgeable in this area than i am: 1) what language were the 2 words 'til' and 'donk' from? dutch? flemish? walloon? 2) i put the dutch word 'stadsreus' and gave my translation of 'city giants', but the correct english word needs to be put in here (if it exists). the Commons article for 'giants' talks about the folk tradition of "giants" and that's the word they use, so i used it here. but the equivalent english article uses the spanish word. perhaps after Commons agrees upon a correct title, and the english article also (view the 'Gigantes y Cabezudos' article's discuss page), then it needs to be fixed here too. 3) wut the heck is a 'flower village'? ive never heard of it, but maybe its cuz they dont use that term here in the US. if anyone knows about #1 and #3, fix them here. then go voice your opinion on #2 and come back here later to update as needed. Ivansevil 02:39, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy/edit and Grammar
Talk:CODEN

message: On Template talk:Infobox Journal#CODEN linkage I have asked about online lookup resources for CODEN. John Vandenberg 02:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: no actual online lookup resources for CODEN available, since its "prorietary" to CAS, and they do not want, obviously, to publish all the contents of the collected CODEN database openly on the web. Only reliable source for CODEN is CASSI, nothing else! --Steven69 (talk) 22:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online resources 

message: The external link 
* Homepage of the International CODEN Service
returns
:404 Not Found
:
:The page you requested was not found. The link you followed may be incorrect or outdated. Please try the CAS home page or the CAS site search to find the information you are looking for.
I have deleted the link. --Thnidu (talk) 02:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  bad link 

message: at the top ranked journals, such as Journal of Biological Chemistry
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22CODEN%22+site%3Awww.jbc.org&btnG=Search&cts=1249085740679&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
--222.64.209.227 (talk) 00:19, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You seems to be jocking. The CODEN does not need to be available on a journals site, since the CODEN is not issued by the journal itself, but from ACS, and there from CAS at the CODEN department. You can seach for CODEN at CASSI, but I doubt you know what CASSI is. My advice to you: please do not trust to all facts that only are accessible by searching with google. Hope you can read also books, and hopefully you are able to go to a library and know how use and seach in a "real library". Maybe that helps to give you evidence....., but I guess not....--Steven69 (talk) 22:02, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The info is not available.... 

message: I have created a  template to help unify the inclusion and display of CODEN codes in articles (including inside of citations via  - at least for as long as it does not support a  parameter by itself). At present, it is just a trivially simple "wrapper", taking a CODEN code as a parameter and displaying it. However, active usage of the template potentially allows for centralized maintenance of the appearance, to add meta-data framing and some parameter validation. It also helps machine readability of CODEN codes by bots.
Unfortunately, direct linking is not easily possible, but at least in theory, the template could - in the future - implement some "internal" database-driven lookup mechanism changing the display of known CODEN codes into active links. This database would have be to fed by associations originally provided by users or bots collecting CODEN ids and their associations from other resources (or by comparing them with other data such as ISSNs).
The more the template gets used when citing CODEN codes, the higher the chances the template will provide some useful functionality in the future.
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template CODEN for unified appearance and easier maintenance
Template talk:Ontario provincial political parties

message: Regardless of the fact that Party for People with Special Needs is a red link, it should be included on this template. The party is recognized by Elections Ontario; exclusion of the party from this template indirectly implies that they are not. Inclusion of the party will provide a quick reference to current registered parties, and will be an easy comparison how parties fared after the 2007 election.
To the comment that "Usually red-links don't belong in templates", please indicate where on Wikipedia:Template FAQ or Help:Template that removal of red links is recommended. Furthermore, please refer to User:Electionworld/Parties - many political party templates do have red links. I have reverted the edits by User:GreenJoe, and to prevent an edit war, I would ask that the edits would not  be re-reverted until this discussion has ended. Morgan695 02:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Electionworld is a user, it's not policy, or even a guideline. Red links don't belong in the template until the article is created. End of story. GreenJoe 03:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of Special Needs Party 

message: They're not all notable. GreenJoe 02:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How so? They've all been elected to the OnLA (or in the case of 'Pre-confederation parties', were important Upper Canada reformers) and are therefore notable. Morgan695 03:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic parties
Talk:List of National Historic Landmarks in Hawaii

message: Despite "list" being in the article title, this, like other tables of NHLs by state, is far more than a mere list and is to be rated on scale Stub / Start / B, and then go for Featured List status.  See discussion / proposed criteria for rating list-table-articles like this, under discussion in Talk page of WP:NRHP.  Consistent with proposal there, I am rating this as Stub for now.  To reach Start quality rating, among other criteria in the proposal, there must be at least a Stub article for each NHL in the complete list of NHLs for Hawaii. doncram 01:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated to C-class for wp:NRHP, now consistent with other NHL area-lists that have complete coverage, meaning an article properly holding NHL info for each NHL. doncram (talk) 08:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, but I'm rating it as List-Class for WP:HAWAII.  The assessment criteria is used for articles, not lists, however I can see that many projects have chosen to do it differently and I respect that. Viriditas (talk) 10:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating as an ARTICLE not as a mere wiki-List

message: In the title, is Hawaii spelled with an apostrophe for some reason, or should it be moved?--Appraiser (talk) 21:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course this is not an appostrophe but an okina. According to various manuals of styles, special characters should be avoided in article titles, and it looks like this was quietly changed in August 2009. If it were me, I would consistently use the okina in the island names (as has been done), but avoid it consistently when talking about the US State, since that appears in almost any English dictionary as just plain "Hawaii" (and in the article a few places). I would also use the characters in the presentation (but not article titles!) for the sites themselves, e.g. Honokōhau, Mookini Heiau, etc. W Nowicki (talk) 23:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Sanada Ten Braves

message: Is the book academic or pop culture book? Doesn't the book clarify the ten braves were fiction?--Harada 3nosuke (talk) 07:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Joel Levy, Ninja: The Shadow Warrior

message: I just happened to be browsing when I saw this article. I noticed that most of the article is actually about this manga series based on the Ten Braves. I think it should be slimmed down to very little maybe just a paragraph or two because as it is now the manga takes up more space than the original imformation. Since there are other articles about Deeper Kyo all that should be mentioned here is that it is partly based on the Ten Braves. Other articles like (for lack of a better example in my head) Worl War II the articles on that don't use up half the article describing the story of media based on the original topic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.149.138.145 (talk) 06:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deeper Kyo information needs to be slimmed down 

message: I guess only one of several of these links should be used here?  --82.160.239.145 (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The [[jp: here seems to be broken 

message: The article does not specify whether this group is a legend based on history or purely fictional. The earliest reference mentioned is to a "novel published in the Edo period". If they are purely fictional, if there is no historical record or scholarly literature to substantiate their existence, this needs to be clarified, in plain and direct wording. Boneyard90 (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Nanashi (MÄR)

message: Didn't there used to be something about Nanashi being Joker from Nobuyuki Anzai's other series Flame of Recca, or was that just fan research with no actual support or evidence?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.251.125.84 (talk) 02:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old rumor 

message: Has anyone noticed that Nanashi's Electric Eye, could have gotten its name from Electric Eye by Judas Priest? It's a legitimate thought. Someone keep deleting it when posted on Nanashi's wikipedia page, next to Electirc Eye.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.221.151.152 (talk) 23:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electirc Eye
Talk:I with bar

message: Why aren't there any examples for this sound? That's what I came to this page for...
Is it like the I in "this" and "tick"?
:Try Close central unrounded vowel. --Euniana/Talk/Blog 02:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: English does not have this sound!--95.116.239.251 (talk) 19:13, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: No examples?