Talk:Traktor DJ Studio

message: In response to the  template, I believe this article is not a candidate for speedy deletion. I had similar concerns a few months ago and suggested a merge to Native Instruments, which was unsuccessful. Proponents of this article believe it is significant enough to merit its own page as seen in the responses at Talk:Native Instruments#Traktor merging into this article. Another bit of evidence that supports its notability are the links to it from various articles; I suspect these arose independently and not as internal link spamming.
NOTE: I found this article useful. Please don't delete. I am researching DJs and needed to know what they were talking about.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.113.159.247 (talk) 09:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and I was a bit sloppy in my argument by wandering off in that direction. I hope someone can clean this up without having to do a complete rewrite. ✤ JonHarder talk 14:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a bit too much here for this to be a speedy as a blatent advert; but there is no credible inoformation here that establishes this as in anyway a notable piece of software, so I've proposed this for deletion on that mark.--Isotope23 17:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangon

message: i hope to simply remove the model was the right way. On the other case, please do not hesitate to write me a message..
I determined to remove the deletion proposal, as i was looking to this article to learn some infos and was very surprised. It seems to me traktor is used by many dj's, maybe not for their "official" mixes, but still do they use it. 
I might be wrong, so please argue. I confess i am acting as urgency, as the article would have been deleted and everyone seems to agree there is a need for discussion. actually, i rather think the real problem is the low quality. I tryed to remove the worst "point of viewed" statements. 
Maybe using some external sources would help to describe more interesting context... instead of list of "wonderful funtions"; )
pyl 23:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not even slow deletion... 

message: :Image:T3Browser.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:T3Browser.jpg

message: :Image:T3Full.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:T3Full.jpg

message: :Image:Traktor-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Traktor-logo.jpg

message: This sounds like it's written like an advertisment..
68.38.5.51 (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  There's too much marketing language.  I don't have time to do it now, but this article should definitely be pruned for neutrality.  Let's get rid of 'easy' this and 'very powerful' that.  Those are judgements, not facts.  Djdannyq (talk) 11:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Agreed --plz reply in my talkpage. Smooth Henry (talk) 14:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Further agreement. I'm going to do some editing now. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 21:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Also put the  flag up there. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 22:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement?