lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Deeley

message: "Peter is currently writing a book about the history of LBC - the first commercial radio station."  Surely not. What about Radio Luxembourg, Radio Caroline, etc. Kittybrewster 09:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  LBC the first commercial radio station 

message: I'm surprised to see the proposed deletion of this article on the grounds that Mr Deeley is a "non-notable radio presenter". I think his stints at both LBC and Talk Radio speak otherwise. He may no longer be working in radio but I landed on this page to satisfy a curiosity, so I think it useful that the page remains. I'll edit it accordingly. (Quite a few other UK radio presenters were tagged as non-notable at the same time, some more deserving than others. I might have a look at them, too, and see if I can contribute to better articles.)
--Trimoline (talk) 19:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *Simply being a reporter doesn't give notability. It'd occasionally be nice if that were enough, but most often it isn't. You have to show that he's overwhelmingly notable by way of him receiving coverage in reliable sources. What this equates to is that Deeley himself was the focus of coverage in books, TV, radio, or news. Him interviewing notable persons makes it more likely that he would get covered in RS, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by him interviewing notable persons or working for a notable company. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)  20:44, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

text: *A good example would be any given host on a major news channel such as CNN. For every one person that is extremely notable, there are at least 4-5 new anchors that are known and recognizable, yet aren't considered to be notable enough to warrant an entry because they didn't gain coverage in RS.Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)  20:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitely of note 
Talk:Templeogue

message: This article really needs a full renovation. I recently completed a study of the area so I may begin to add sections of this onto the article in the near future Bella vista 21:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Article 

message: It is pretty clear from the main reference given for the naming of the village (Tobar Moling and Templeogue: Myles V. Ronan, Dublin Historical Record, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Dec., 1942 - Feb., 1943), pp. 73-74 that they church is named after Mel not by him.  Mel refers to a contemporary of St Patrick and not a 13th Century saint.
DublinSoil (talk) 19:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of church 

message: Ali O Pablo is a local rapper and musician. He is a real person. Has anyone else came to his local shows? 123WasTaken (talk) 15:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Most "real people" enjoy singing but do not appear in an encyclopaedia unless they have achieved notability. I found no publicity for Mister Pablo. Spideog (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: have you not seen him near the village? 123WasTaken (talk) 20:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ali O Pablo
Talk:Madballs

message: Spellings are wildly variable here (Slobulus vs. Slobulous, Screamin Meemie vs. Screaming Meeme). I don't know which are correct, but they should be made consistent. 86.142.245.181 02:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Character Name Spelling

message: As far as I know, there were only the two episodes of the cartoon made, both put out only on video by Hi-Tops video.  Where did the information about there being 6 episodes come from?
:I wrote that.  I myself have only ever seen the two hi-tops videos as well.  However, i read on at least 2 messageboards that there are 6.  That's why I wrote "its said".  I've sent an email off to nelvana to get to the bottom of it.  I'll correct it if i find out I'm wrong. Dross82 01:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Was Cartoon on Saturday Morning?  How Many Episodes?

message: This article really seems to have a major bias against Madballs, sometimes using unnecesarry and demeaning adjectives. Tagged NPOV and cleanup. It might also need to be be tagged with template:Expert. sea sponges 03:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias Against Madballs
Talk:Urokinase

message: Why do authors insist on writing this drivel? It was not 'first' discovered in 1947, it was discovered in 1947. It was discovered ONCE ONLY, not a first time and a second time (or whatever).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, the "first" has been deleted now. EMsmile (talk) 14:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not this absurd 'first' again! 

message: I know this is a minor issue, but I noticed the edit boxes are appearing in the wrong place on this page - could it be something to do with the infoboxes' code? I note the first two boxes appear after the first infobox, at least for my browser (Firefox 2.0.0.17) and resolution (1440x900) --Rogerb67 (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit links not placed correctly 

message: Are there any sources for section 3 about the relationship with cancer? 89.31.50.92 (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: This seems to be the same as PLAU (plasminogen activator, urokinase). I'm not sure how to merge this without messing up all the infoboxes. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, it would be wrong to merge these articles, Urokinase and PLAU. This article outlines a class of enzymes (EC 3.4.21.73), while the article PLAU has a focus on a specific human gene product, PLAU, from that class. --Dcirovic (talk) 20:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: So when was it discovered?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  13:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Eureka''? 

message: I agree that the two pages should be merged, but if not at least a link to PLAU is in order. Gon-no-suke (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to gene
Talk:Masonic Knights Templar

message: Hi everyone, I am hoping to keep this page for information only. Conspiracy theorists, and "Da Vinci Coders" please consider making your own page if you must put something on Wiki about the organization.
I am replacing the Shrine, Scottish Rite, and Tall Cedar links and schedualing them as "related organizations". Appelant Organizations was probably not the best wording. 
Again I ask please refrain for editorial unless you have first hand knowledge of the Masonic Knights Templar Commandery (i.e. you are a Mason).  Thank you. (unsigned by User:166.66.16.116)
:They are not that, either. While I appreciate all of these groups, The Shrine & Scottish Rite just don't really belong here, in this way. If you'd like to include them, perhaps try to give background in the article. Grye 07:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Only the facts?

message: For the record, Wikipedia articles should NOT be used to promote personal opinions or organizations that that the editor belongs to. So I've edited the article to protect it from anonymous editors with an agenda, remove POV as much as possible but also to increase its quality but providing useful internal links for example. --Loremaster 20:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit protection

message: I removed the mention of the Great Priory of Scotland being masonic since it obviously has to be masonic in order to be mentioned in that section. I've also removed the link to the working tools website because Wikipedia should NOT be used to promote an organization or sell a product. --Loremaster 16:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I will continue removing them in the future if they are put back by anonymous users who refuse to engage in discussion. --Loremaster 16:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy and adverstising 

message: In order to try and untangle the differences between the Medieval association and the Masonic degree, I propose that we rename both pages, and set up a central disambiguation page.  Anyone with an opinion on the matter is invited to comment at Talk:Knights Templar.  Thanks.  Elonka 20:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templar disambiguation (major page renaming proposal)
Talk:Brain Stew / Jaded

message: I don't think this was ever released on Vinyl, should we take that out of the format?
--Imatt711 21:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I own the vinyl single. You're probably uninformed that many albums and singles are STILL released in vinyl - especially by punk and indie rock bands (notably in Britian) - but record chains like FYE and Virgin MegaStore don't carry them. Check your local independently owned record store, Newbury Comics (if you live in New England) or online. Doc Strange 13:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vinyl? 

message: The article claims the music video is in sepia tone. Last I remember, it was black and white.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.227.247 (talk) 02:08, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sepia Tone 

message: Someone changed Brain Stew's genre from Post-Grunge to Alternative Metal...I reverted that. Please keep an eye on people who just add nonsense --Revilal90 (talk) 02:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Its back. Its also neither. It is punk, as is Jaded.Jasper420 15:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Compton Dundon

message: Previous version stated that Compton Dundon is on the edge of Sedge Moor.  There is no such place as Sedge Moor; however there is a Sedgemoor.  Until the exact meaning can be checked I suggest broadening it to on the edge of the Somerset Levels.
:Ordnance Survey and Collins-Bartholomew both disagree.  Joe D (t) 16:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Economies of agglomeration

message: Kywang0924 (talk) 06:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

message: Really light on citations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.16.113.0 (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: Dr. Berliant has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Berliant has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference 1: Berliant, Marcus & Yu, Chia-Ming, 2009. "Locational signaling and agglomeration," MPRA Paper 19462, University Library of Munich, Germany.
*Reference 2: Marcus Berliant & Ping Wang, 2004. "Dynamic Urban Models: Agglomeration and Growth," Urban/Regional 0404006, EconWPA.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 02:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Berliant's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Martinho has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Martinho has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Martinho, Vitor Joao Pereira Domingues, 2011. "Polarization versus agglomeration," MPRA Paper 32339, University Library of Munich, Germany.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 15:23, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Martinho's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Xepapadeas has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Xepapadeas has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Efthymia Kyriakopoulou & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2014. "Atmospheric Pollution in Rapidly Growing Urban Centers: Spatial Policies and Land Use Patterns," DEOS Working Papers 1407, Athens University of Economics and Business.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 20:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Xepapadeas's comment on this article 

message: Maybe it would be better to rename article to Economics of agglomeration. That way makes it easier to talk about economies of agglomeration and economies of agglomeration. Jonpatterns (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thoughts Economies of agglomeration is probably fine with a little more copy editing. Jonpatterns (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Economics of agglomeration
Talk:Victor Gruen

message: Can someone translate the missing parts from the german version of this article? There is something about pedestrian zones in Fresno and Fort Worth, but I don't think I'd be able to translate these sentences into good english :-/ Greetings -- Otto Normalverbraucher 02:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: German Wikipedia article

message: Should this tv show be linked to here? http://www.abc.net.au/tv/gruentransfer/ -- 203.217.81.78 (talk) 08:09, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ABC show

message: about the [citation needed] comment against "he landed "with an architect's degree, eight dollars, and no English.", this is a verbatim quote from the Newyorker article by Malcolm Gladwell that is already listed as a reference (#2) 
Ashwinhegde (talk) 07:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noticing that. Fixed the citation. --Elekhh (talk) 09:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: Copied content and references from Victor Gruen to Gruen transfer; see former page's history for attribution.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Copied references from Gruen transfer to Victor Gruen; see former page's history for attribution. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: An SPA IP added this to the "Influence" section. I've removed it. If someone wants to restore it, please don't do so in the same section, where it's obviously off-topic. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal anecdote
Talk:Said Akbar Babrak

message: Bold textPLEASE MAKE THE CORRECTION: The name of the assasin was not Saad Akbar. the correct name is Syed Akber. Please refer to this link:
http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/pakistan/pakintrigue.htm#liaquat
Corrected by: Saad Ahmed Alvi.
-- moved from article page GabrielF 03:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found this comment on a news article. Sadly not RS:
"@M.Saeed Said Akbar was not Kurdish. He was the son of Babrak Khan Zadran and has a very big clan still living in Khost. Said Akbar's two sons are Professors in the U.S and his other son is still living in his ancestral village. His widow was alive and well in 2009 still living in Abbottabad."
https://www.dawn.com/news/1213461
Koopinator (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info 

message: Saad is different name. His name is Said not Saad. I am correcting it. --Spasage (talk) 15:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Said vs Saad

message: The title of the article is Said Akbar Babrak.  His name is given in the first line as Said Akbar Khan Babrakzai or Said Akbar Khan.  This is a little confusing but may be perfectly clear to those familiar with Pakistani or Afghan naming conventions.  Can someone explain?  Thanks. Cross Reference (talk) 14:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:X-Seed 4000

message: Good gosh! How much would this cost??? --Shultz 03:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Because it has already been fully designed using materials available today, the structure could, in principle, be built, although it would likely cost several hundred billion dollars, if not more."  --Darklegions 05:20, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

text: On second thought, new, faster, and cheaper ways to build will be invented, along with building materials that are stronger and faster to make. That ought to make it cheaper to build later on. --Shultz IV 09:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost

message: Does anyone have a picture of the X-SEED? I really want to see what it looks like! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moped (talk • contribs) 
:Aside from the picture featured in the article, there is this: Emporis Just another romanticized artistic conception, though. --Mitglied von die Elektronischenzyklopädie Schriftleitung 04:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 

message: The template in front of the article seems to indicate that is is expected.  However, in the article itself, it was made clear that it was not meant to be built at all.  I'm confused. --Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 22:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing that it was not meant to be built at first, but vision has made it to a potential reality. Singularity 05:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expected? 

message: How long would this take to build?27Azerbaijan (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction Length 

message: I am not a Wikipedian so I may be wrong, but the sentence "These structures will be in Asia" sounds a little awkward and unnecessary.
71.246.200.190 (talk) 02:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Asia

message: Hello all,
I was recently looking at the article Proposed tall buildings and structures, and found the tallest envisioned building is the Tokyo Tower of Babel. Note the lack of the word fully, a word used in the description of X-Seed 4000. If this is notable enough, can it be added. Sorry, I haven't been on this page before, so its advertisement as the tallest fully envisioned building in the world seemed dubious.
Cheers JoshMuirWikipedia (talk) 06:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokyo Tower of Babel 

message: The 2014 anime Kill la Kill features a megastructure very similar to the X-Seed 4000, also constructed in Tokyo Bay. You can see the similarities here. Although the parallels are incredibly obvious, at least to my eyes, I don't have a source specifically stating that the design was inspired by the X-Seed. So, 2 questions: what is the general stance on "in popular culture" sections with only one entry, and are there any provisions in the community guidelines for things like this, where something is fairly cut and dry, but sources are difficult or impossible to find?
ScreamingRobot (talk) 22:40, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible "In Popular Culture" Section
Talk:Norman Saunders

message: There is no exclamation point on the trading-card series Mars Attacks, as seen on the cover card on this page of Norm Saunders' site http://www.normansaunders.com/MrzAtx%2C01.html 
The exclam pt is only on the movie title. — Tenebrae 03:46, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of "Mars Attacks"
Talk:FitzRoy Somerset, 4th Baron Raglan

message: The entry for Fitzroy Richard Somerset is redundant, but properly spells his first name (unlike this entry) and contains a useful biography. Lindmere 03:49, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed for merge 

message: Is the fourth Lord Raglan really "best known for his book The Hero"?  I would think his Monmouthshire Houses, with Sir Cyril Fox, was far more important, and much more widely known.  The article doesn't even mention this.  I shall re-word accordingly, unless there's a consensus not to do so. KJP1 (talk) 15:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I am beginning the process of updating this article and sorting out some of the problems with the references. Readers may note certain claims removed, and this is due to the fact that I was unable to verify them.  If someone can find a good source for the claims then of course the material can be reintroduced.Littleboybrew (talk) 01:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016 update 

message: The section in literary works has one cite. This allegedly supports a claim that "Jesus matched a number of traits in lord (sic) Raglan". It doesn't actually do this. If the sentence means anything, it is surely saying that Jesus matched a number of traits identified by Lord Raglan as common to Mythic Heroes. Setting that aside, and the issue of whether the whole section is original research, I'm again driven to ask whether, in 2017, Raglan's book, The Hero, is really his chief claim to fame. I tend to think his history of Monmouthshire Houses, with Fox, remains the more enduring work. Thoughts? KJP1 (talk) 14:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's always problematic to state that anyone is "best known for" any one work, unless the fact is obvious and universally acknowledged.  Why don't we simply say, in the lead: "His books included X.. and Y....".  Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:30, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A sensible solution, and I'll do so. Although, I once recall having a discussion about whether Nikolaus Pevsner was better known for The Buildings of England or Pioneers of Modern Design, which seemed rather surreal. KJP1 (talk) 12:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Lord Raglan's books have been on my shelves for nearly 50 years, but I was not aware of his works on Monmouthshire Houses until recently when I thought of looking him up on Wikipedia. I suspect that his anthropological works are better known among people who do not live in or near to South Wales. NRPanikker (talk) 04:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  - It’s amazing what one can learn on here. I’m biased, as I was brought up in Monmouthshire and my main interest is architecture, so I’ve read Monmouthshire Houses over and over, but none of his anthropological works. For this reason, I think Ghmyrtle’s construction is best.  As an aside, have you thought about an article on The Hero? I wrote the one on Monmouthshire Houses as I found I was quoting it so often. Although, I've no idea whether there are sufficient reliable secondary sources. KJP1 (talk) 08:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability, again, and OR
Talk:Kosambi–Karhunen–Loève theorem

message: i removed the tag.  the intro to the article has been edited a bit since then.  if you feel the edits still aren't sufficient, feel free to reinsert the tag but please leave some specific suggestions as to what's missing from the article or what you feel is confusing.  thanks.  Lunch 04:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is still too technical. It is pretty much incomprehensible to somebody who isn't already familiar with the transform. The details are fine, but article needs a less-technical introduction: what is this, and why would we want it?Geoffrey.landis (talk) 14:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: too technical tag

message: why does the inner product notation smack of dirac's bracket notation in quantum notation. the whole thing smacks of quantum mechanics and seems vaguely familiar.Godspeed John Glenn! Will 20:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  bracket notation

message: I think the link in the third paragraph to the "Karhunen-Loève transform" is not really useful because it brings to the very same page. Furthermore, it can bring to misunderstandings with the users regarding the differences between the theorem and the transformation.
Here, I paste the paragraph at issue:
In contrast to a Fourier series where the coefficients are fixed numbers and the expansion basis consists of sinusoidal functions (that is, sine and cosine functions), the coefficients in the Karhunen–Loève theorem are random variables and the expansion basis depends on the process. In fact, the orthogonal basis functions used in this representation are determined by the covariance function of the process. One can think that the Karhunen–Loève transform adapts to the process in order to produce the best possible basis for its expansion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gian.steve (talk • contribs) 09:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  weird link to KL Transformation
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Khurshid Marwat

message: My vote on second AfD seems to have ended up here also.  Strange!  Just ignore it.    
I also seem to have inadvertently deleted the result - sorry folks!!!
The result of the debate was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 08:44, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry - I think I've cleaned it all up now :) — sjorford (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post AfD comment