Talk:Professional ethics

message: This information in this artice was originally created by 
Liz Seacome at 03:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creator

message: At Allen Weinstein, i removed an in-line external lk to "Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct" of American Historical Association, for the following reasons: 
: The page is the current edition of a frequently revised document and thus not pertinent to the 1997 apparent claim that Weinstein violated prof stds that existed then, let alone at some point in 1978 or earlier.
: The article doesn't specify what acts constituted violations, so the stds can't act as verification of violation.
: Even if it did, that would be OR: the topic is the controversy, not anything about which position on it is fact.
: The link was not even a description-less footnote, but a piped lk with the accompanying article's title, essentially substituting an ext page for our article, and thus by its intent violating our prohibition on in-line ext lks.
On the other hand, if an editor would like to create a section or 'graph in the accompanying article using this source, it might be valuable for the Weinstein bio to internally lk to it.--Jerzy•t 23:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source material 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://it.toolbox.com/wiki/index.php/Professional_Ethics). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   Velella  Velella Talk   19:09, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Professional ethics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130618044002/http://www.architecture.com/Files/RIBAProfessionalServices/ProfessionalConduct/Constitution/CodeOfConduct/2005RIBACodeOfProfessionalConduct.pdf to http://www.architecture.com/Files/RIBAProfessionalServices/ProfessionalConduct/Constitution/CodeOfConduct/2005RIBACodeOfProfessionalConduct.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.rep.routledge.com/article
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111216090731/http://www.rics.org/site/download_feed.aspx?fileID=6309&fileExtension=PDF to http://www.rics.org/site/download_feed.aspx?fileID=6309&fileExtension=PDF
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120729062133/http://www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk/final_report/annex_a/chapter_4_15.htm to http://www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk/final_report/annex_a/chapter_4_15.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060716001602/http://www.asaecenter.org/PublicationsResources/articledetail.cfm?ItemNumber=13073 to http://www.asaecenter.org/PublicationsResources/articledetail.cfm?ItemNumber=13073
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The general area of professionalism seems to me to be unhelpfully split over several articles, including Professionalism, Profession, Professional Conduct, Professional, Professional Ethics, Professional Judgement and Professional Certification. While there is a lot of duplication, there are also gaps in some that are addressed by others. For instance, the response to uncertified persons working as if a professional is not mentioned in Professional Certification. There may also be some disagreements – concerning different professions, geographies and legislation traditions. How could they be better coordinated? DS0022 (talk) 11:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure duplication is considered a bug on wikipedia - unlike in code. I might suggest a navbox (WP:BTW) to encourage people (including editors to move between the related pages) Talpedia 14:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Coordination