lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Weather Underground

message: To add to this article: an explanation of how this terrorist group possibly got access to the Pentagon in order to place a bomb inside a bathroom there. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 12:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: Fred Hampton personally disavowed the Weather Underground and called them "anarchistic, opportunistic, chauvinistic, and Custeristic". For some reason this is mentioned nowhere in the article. The Weather Underground looked up to the BPP a lot, but that doesn't mean they were allies. 69.145.32.181 (talk) 17:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Panther Party should be removed from the Allies section

message: This edit removed a sourced statement and added new, unsourced commentary about Larry Grathwohl. Per the source I placed in-line, which was originally at the end of the paragraph: "To start, there is the testimony of a controversial and arguably untrustworthy source: Larry Grathwohl. He was the principal police and then FBI informant inside Weatherman in early 1970..." This suggests that Grathwohl is not good for self-sourcing. Further, the cited source notes, "But when Weatherman went underground, forming itself into small and clandestine collectives of deeply committed activists who had known one another personally for a long time, informant penetration of Weatherman became close to impossible. The FBI complained continually about this problem."
Per BRD, I have reverted to the original text, with the addition of the in-line citation I added for the specific claim. To change this, please bring reliable sources, AGF, and achieve consensus. Freelance-frank (talk) 01:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larry Grathwohl
Talk:The Games Factory

message: what is cnc
*Click 'N' Create, another program by Clickteam.--68.229.103.250 10:57, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is CNC? 

message: I'm wondering about the claim in the article that no books have been written about how to use it.  The copy I purchased a while ago came with a decent sized manual.--198.37.18.118 00:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TGF Manuals 

message: From what I remember when I had a demo of TGF, it was clearly developped by Europress. 
And then the rights were BOUGHT by Clickteam who were working on Multimedia Fusion at the time. I may be wrong, but I need someone to verify this please. (as information on TGF other from Clickteam has very low availability.) 69.157.157.211 (talk) 06:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europress vs. Clickteam
Talk:Godfrey Giffard

message: The article contains the statement:
:The quarrel appears to date from 1288 when the monks considered that the rights of the church of Worcester had been infringed by the bishop's refusal to allow their precentor to summon those who were to be ordained at an ordination at Westbury.
Unfortunately there are at least three places in England called Westbury, and no context to determine which one is being referred to here. So the link remains pointing at the dab page. If you know which one is being referred to here, please correct. -- Chris j wood 22:13, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unable to disambiguate Westbury
Talk:X Parasite

message: The X are a parasite aomeba right? SA-X are the smartest special elite.there are around 10 of them.There are 
MANY MANY OTHER
X THAT AREN'T SA-X.Nuff said.--Vurtual Ruler98 03:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically true. So? --Herald Alberich 07:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why they're different 

message: Methinks this section needs a rewrite. It's got too many long, convoluted sentences, and has a need for consistent capitalisation. --220.237.67.125
::I think its just fine. -ZeroTalk 16:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. It reads too much like a transcription of the cut-scenes in which the SA-X appears, and contains too much spurious information (do we really need to describe the Omega Metroid battle that thoroughly?) --220.237.67.125 12:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SA-X section 

message: how can i help in cleaning up this article?--Lerdthenerd 07:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean up? 

message: this article has no outside hyperlinks, or references to back up what has beeen written, without them how are we supposed to know what is or is not speculation.--Lerdthenerd 19:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  no reference links!
Talk:Japanese opium policy in Taiwan (1895–1945)

message: I know, I know, they all look alike but honestly the Dutch and the Portuguese are actually different groups of people.
:In 1544, Taiwan was used as a Dutch service station for ships sailing to China and Japan.[13]
There's a nonsense citation for this nonsense, but that's a century early. The Dutch only reached Indonesia in 1598. 1544 is the date for the arrival of the Portuguese on Taiwan. — LlywelynII 13:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Dutch ≠ Portuguese

message: :In 1544, Taiwan was used as a Dutch service station for ships sailing to China and Japan. It was during this period that opium was heavily trafficked by the Dutch from the East Indies through to Taiwan and then onto China. The use of Taiwan as a trading port continued throughout the Chinese occupation of Taiwan prior to the annexation. Taiwan was used as a Chinese trading centre for the French, Dutch and Portuguese where opium was continually traded across Taiwan. As a result, opium because widespread throughout Taiwanese society and the profitability of the trade was identified.
Ignoring the bad grammar and phrasing, this is all obvious nonsense. There was a whole war involved in opening up the opium trade with China and it happened a damn sight later than 1544. (Yes, there was some trade before that but it wasn't societally corrosive at the levels discussed here but a luxury for the upper class. It also wasn't large until the British were running Indian plantations and going nuts thinking about how to pay down their tea bills.) That it pretends to be cited suggests that nothing on the current page can be trusted, certainly nothing by the editor who lied about all of this. Any student involved with this should be flunked and any editor interested in the page probably needs to review the entire thing at this point. — LlywelynII 13:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: It's worse than I thought

message: The article has a lot of mostly off-topic information about the history of Taiwan, but missed completely the eradication of opium smoking under the Japanese colonial government until the more recent edit. It needs major revision. Samsontu (talk) 03:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a terrible article
Talk:4-H

message: Is a section on organization structure beneficial to developing the content of this page? As an extension of the pledge's closing remarks (i.e. "for my club, my community, my country, and my world), an emphasis on the importance of club, county (or parish), and state work may develop a great understanding of the organization. In addition, highlighting the state programs with clubs in elementary and middle school classrooms may be beneficial. GreenTea32 (talk) 22:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organizational Structure 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cleatus mgeetus (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Composition and Culture
Talk:Sunbird

message: The CRC Handbook of Avian Body Massses, Second Edition (Dunning 2008) has the Lovely Sunbird at 3–5.3 g (mean of ten 4 g), compared to 4–6 g (mean of six 4.8 g) for the Black-bellied Sunbird (assigned to the genus Cinnyris there), credited as the smallest here. Extra noteworthy, since the Lovely Sunbird also appears to be the smallest Passerine according to the book – though there's a single weight of 3.5 g for the Chinese Leaf-warbler (as P. sichuanensis). The Short-tailed Pygmy Tyrant is listed at 4.5–6 g. --Anshelm '77 (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smallest species
Talk:Stolen Artifacts from Asia found in Japan

message: I enclose my closing remarks in full:
: The result of the debate was Keep.  Though ostensibly there is a huge delete consensus, many of the delete voters seem to believe that content could be merged--since there is more than one article author this is not possible.  Another reason for deletion given is the name--this can be solved by moving the article.  One delete voter wanted deletion "per nom" although in fact the nominator was asking for merge suggestions.
: There is therefore no consensus on a course of actions that can be performed under the GFDL.  I therefore invoke the cornerstone of our deletion policy: When in doubt, don't delete.
: This is a problem that cannot be solved by AfD.  I ask those who think the content is useful to find a suitable article and merge, and those who think the title is wrong to move it to a new title and delete the redirect.
: Closing is difficult, and it's easy to get it wrong.  I would not oppose an early relisting of this article if anyone feels strongly that I have got it wrong. --Tony SidawayTalk 11:10, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD result

message: Did Japan sign the UNESCO convention for return of artifacts?  All the article says is that they thought about it. RJFJR 03:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Open items
Talk:Florida State Highway System

message: Just a heads up, these pages need some help:
# Route 336 (Florida)
# Route 343 (Florida)
# Route 347 (Florida)
# Route 351A (Florida)
# Route 378 (Florida)
# Route 4075 (Florida)
# Route 444 (Florida)
# Route 44B (Florida)
# Route 474 (Florida)
# Route 484 (Florida)
# Route 502 (Florida)
# Route 539 (Florida)
# Route 553 (Florida)
# Route 600A (Florida)
# Route Business 44 (Florida)
# Route Business A1A (Florida)
I hope this is a good place to mention this... Salad Days 18:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are all incorrectly titled for starters, Florida doesn't call their state highways routes.  Well, looking closer, they are actually county roads.  Well at any rate, they all need to be moved to a more appropriate title.  --Holderca1 19:21, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See also [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Route_0120_%28Florida%29]. There appears to be a great deal of these. Salad Days 20:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears a specific person created all of these, User:Florida Route Numbers.  --Holderca1 20:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should we re-nominate for deletion all of his or her misnamed roads, perhaps? Salad Days 20:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will take a look at them over the weekend and move them to a proper location.  They probably wouldn't get deleted, there are many other county road articles from other states.  Although, I wouldn't be heartbroken if they are deleted, they are hardly on the top of my to do list.  --Holderca1 21:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that there's an official List of county roads in Florida, perhaps we should add these roads and more to the list, and make shields for them. I've also seen my share of them in the Tampa Bay Metro Area, so perhaps I should add them to the list as well. ---- DanTD 16:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I am working on it, see :Category:County routes in Florida as well.  I will take care of the shields.  --Holderca1 17:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Roads on [[WP:DEP]]
Talk:Juan Gris

message: Someone uploaded an :Image:Juan Gris.jpg.  I can't identify it, but it must be in the public domain.  If someone can determine what it is, please include it in the article. Superm401 - Talk 22:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Image now identified and added to the article :-) --Cactus.man ✍ 11:27, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Juan Gris.jpg]] (unidentified) 

message: I've added a new very high resolution work by Juan Gris from the Google Art Project, shown right. Feel free to use if useful. Dcoetzee 11:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image 

message: On his 125th birthday, Google honored him with his own google doodle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.19.248.120 (talk) 06:47, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google 

message: Is there a reason why the given names Carmelo Carlos appear as a parenthesis?  --Lambiam 16:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''('''Carmelo Carlos''')'''
Talk:Shadwell

message: "The population has grown from 8,000 in 1674 to 196,121 today, with an average weekly wage of £773" removed as today's population number clearly means something larger than Shadwell - Tower Hamlets?--Henrygb 00:36, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: A little concerned that most of the text here is:
#unreferenced, and
#most of it derives verbatim from East of London Family History.
It is OK to use referenced paraphrase from the website, but to copy it, without attribution is copyright violation. The way forward is to ref the text, and add material from other sources in paraphrase. Cheers. Kbthompson 16:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: This sentence: " Father of Thomas Jefferson, Peter Jefferson and whose father Thomas Jefferson had and built his estate in Ablemarle County, Virginia's boyhood home was named Shadwell after the Shadwell parish." is both incredibly difficult to understand, and wrong: the county is Albemarle [].
I suppose it's the result of composition by committee, or by wikipedians, all adding bits, or rearranging the words, until this scrambled egg of a sentence results!
But without knowing what is meant, I'm unable to unscramble or correct it.
Nick Barnett (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes no sense to me either, and isn't sourced- as a result, I've removed it until such a time that someone can understand and source it. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jefferson 

message: This section needs to be rewritten — this time, founded on reliable archaeological sources.  For example, the third century 'signal tower' has long since been debunked. Ttocserp (talk) 10:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Origins': notice of intent to rewrite

message: "In the 13th century, the area was a low lying marsh known as Scadflet, from the Anglo-Saxon fleot, meaning a shallow creek or bay"; but the 'fleot' part has gone, and what would be more relevant is an explanation of 'Scad'; in any case, can we have a source? Roryharrow (talk) 21:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Pummelo

message: How come when I search for "pumello" this page does not come up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.138.218 (talk) 02:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  search broken 

message: I am quite confused with this phrase :
:Pummelo must not be confused with Pomelo. See .
Indeed, the given reference does mention pomelo as one of the numerous synonyms of pummelo.
C.P. 08:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The page was unilaterally moved to "pummelo" on 13 Sep by an anonymous user. I've requested a move back, as according previous discussion on this issue "pomelo" is not only synonymous, but the more common name. Jpatokal 04:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Geli Raubal

message: Where is the link to the archived talk page? J S Ayer (talk) 13:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added an archive box. — Diannaa (talk) 13:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Thank you! J S Ayer (talk) 02:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive
Talk:Frank Dobson

message: Please can you sit in a corner for 5 Min and think what you and your cronies are doing to the Labour Party.
Do you do it because you get seconds of glory from the Tory papers?.
YOU should be ashamed of your self, better still join the TORIES as they have loads of MP`s the same as you.
And all because Mr Blair did not want you.
                                          D A Hughes
:I'm intrigued to know whether the above edit is asked of WP editors or of Mr Dobson himself ... ;-P --Vamp:Willow 23:31, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sit Down for 5min 

message: Is under the Criticism and Controversy section. I wonder, Is the fact that he had a quadruple bypass criticism or a controversy? ;-) 
--Archipoeta 20:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quadruple Bypass 
Talk:Paul W. S. Anderson

message: Why isn't his main company Impact Pictures (which he operates with Jeremy Bolt) mentioned? Actually, I only came because I wanted to ask about another (less known) company: New Legacy Films. That company seems to only have produced two films: Resident Evil (film) (2002) and The Three Musketeers (2011 film) (2011), both by Paul Anderson. I can't find anything else about that company online. So, the question is: Is New Legacy Films his company, as well? --SamWinchester000 (talk) 16:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it might be because not a lot of people genuinely know that much about Impact Pictures. They don't have a website, they have some contact info (mostly available only through professional services) and they do almost all of their advertisement via the distributors (like Constantin). A few sentences could be added to the article regardless. --CaptainNtheGameMaster (talk) 19:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  However, do you know anything about New Legagacy Films? I guess Impact Pictures is made mainly for financial reasons. Anderson and Bolt also joked in an interview about themselves being Impact Pictures. (Btw, that is the reason why I would see Resident Evil as mainly a German (or officially German-British) film in its article (because it's produced by Constantin).) --SamWinchester000 (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impact Pictures, anyone? 

message: Old discussions have been archived. --CaptainNtheGameMaster (talk) 12:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive created 

message: Please contact me i have a brilliant idea for a movie......mikey maggart...fb my phones off rite now 2600:6C4A:7E7F:FE4B:41E7:4826:645:2745 (talk) 23:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a  idea
Talk:CMP Media

message: The previous (and first) version of this page consisted of self-congratulation (written in a mixture of the 3rd person singular and second person) identical to that on any of the many pages you can find via [|this Google search]. (Incidentally, this is yet another dramatic revelation of the way corporate self-congratulation is puffed as "news".) Since it looked like spamvertising, my inclination was just to zap it, but somebody more experienced, patient (and wise) than I removed my "Speedy Delete" recommendation. So I've stripped it of the blatant self-promotion and a lot of the vaguely impressive but near-meaningless polysyllables. (I'd still prefer to kill it though. If any admin wishes to do so, he/she needn't apologize to me -- quite the reverse.) Hoary 01:56, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: I changed "Information Week" to "InformationWeek," which is the correct name of the magazine.
company changed name, what's the protocol for starting a new page and redirecting? 
Ivantohelpyou 23:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected a trademark on InformationWeek
Talk:WNBC (disambiguation)

message: ----
Since this is a redirect from W2XBS, it needs explanation of the history and transformation.
:Go for it, dude! Ellsworth 22:31, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Y Kant Tori Read (album)

message: * I dont know why someone added this "official bootleg" tag here, but it is inapplicable. Though the number of bootleg copies of this album far outweighs the number of officially released copies, it is not inherantly a bootleg record. Pacian 07:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "official bootleg"

message: Where does this info come from? The link says that the character Razor was based on the creator's girlfriend. There is no mention of Tori.Tanru 14:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: just read that too. i'm taking the mention out of this article as it's obviously BS.68.255.186.13 12:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Manic Mansion

message: I don't really want to tag this article for a cleanup, but it needs one badly as most of the information is repeated on the band's article.68.255.186.13 12:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, more than two years after the above comment. Today I added the tag about the tone of the article. The text mixes up the album vs. the band and seems like it came from a fanzine. I may fix it up myself, and encourage others to help too. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 10:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: needs clean up

message: FYI, the album cover shot with this article is a bootleg CD cover, not the original LP cover. Shocking Blue (talk) 21:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Photo 

message: References 2 and 3 are confused. —Christian Campbell 11:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 2 and 3 are confused
Talk:Luther Youngdahl

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Luther Wallace Youngdahl was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Lopburi

message: Does anybody know, how to pronounce the Name of the Temple "Narai Ratcha Niwet"? Or do you know where I can find help on that matter? I'm writing a TV-Text on that matter and want to be able to tell the narrator how to pronounce it.
:Hello. "Phra Narai Rachaniwet" (official writing "Phra Narai Rachaniwej", also Ratchanives; ; pronunciation: [pʰrá naraːj râʧa níwet]) is no temple but the palace of King Narai. --hdamm (talk) 10:20, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation: Narai Ratcha Niwet? 

message: I found a interesting piece of literature on the long-tailed macaques (crab-eating monkeys) in Phra Prang Sam Yot. If you're familiar with Lopburi and this scientific article interests you, please edit Lopburi article.
Watanabe, K., Urasopon, N., &  Malaivijitnond, S. (2007). Long-tailed macaques use human hair as dental floss. American Journal of Primatology, online, DOI:10.1002/ajp.20403 Shaxshan 18:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literature on long-tailed macaques 

message: The lead is misleading. It suggests two different distances. Wishva de Silva (talk) 15:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How far is the city from [[Bangkok]]? 

message: I suggest the distance of Lopburi from Bangkok be changed to 110 kilometres—direct line distance. Also, the town is much closer to north from Bangkok, not north-east.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian-the-traveller (talk • contribs) 07:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance and bearing from Bangkok 
Talk:Index of Soviet Union–related articles

message: For a previous debate over the deletion of this article see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Soviet Union-related topics.
If e.g. NKVD Order no. 00439 is not "an individual object". In the future each article of the Soviet Criminal Code to be included because of its National importance. Yours Truly. Cmapm 22:29, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you speak plainly? What do you want here? Is 00439 in or out? If you don't like the preamble, what is your opinion? Please leave brain games to blogs. Mikkalai 00:05, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled