Talk:Olompali State Historic Park

message: The WP:CAL is considering an article on the ranchos of California. This article speaks notably about a Miwok Chief who is one of the few, if not only, tribes to own a rancho. This notable fact is also present on the Novato, CA article. Your comments are welcome about either improving this article or branching it off as a separate article.  Ronbo76 18:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Our projects' choice on this article or proposed article(s) are: 1) improve this article; 2) write an article about the rancho; or 3) write an article about the Hoipu, Camilo Ynitia; or 4) write two separate articles.   Ronbo76 20:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Break-off as part of [[WP:CAL]] project on ranchos 

message: ::I added the Indigenous peoples project tag and offered some suggestions. I also put a parks infobox and geolinks in the article. Hopefully someone with more West Coast expertise can help with the content. I'm not certain about Public Domain as it applies to recently digitized images, and I'm not much of a wikilawyer when it comes to that stuff. Good luck! Kafziel Talk 20:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So far... 

message: Photos of the adobe, settlement and petroglyph would be greatly appreciated. Ronbo76 21:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos requested

message: I marked it not neutral point of view NPOV because there is way too much Burdell history, compared to native and ancient history. Camilo Ynitia and the Miwok people that build the house need greater coverage, while Burdell family needs a lot of trimming. If the Burdell family stories are important, they are tangents and off topic when not about the land and park itself. I think most of the Burdell life stories should be moved to a Burdell biography page. Goldenrowley (talk) 06:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for finding and addressing this. I've tagged it for further attention given that the use of quotes in the article as it is right now doesn't really meet non-free content criteria. But the copyright violation is addressed. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:38, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I consider the NPOV resolved today by removal of the copyrighted material. Thank you! Goldenrowley (talk) 23:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV discussion

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:38, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Substituted at 01:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment