Talk:Canterbury Boys' High School

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canterbury Boys' High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725125726/http://www.schoolwebsites.com.au/web/Default.aspx?PageID=474&SiteID=29 to http://www.schoolwebsites.com.au/web/Default.aspx?PageID=474&SiteID=29
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Canterbury Boys' High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080314221135/http://www.canterbury.nsw.gov.au/www/html/862-history-of-canterbury-suburb.asp to http://www.canterbury.nsw.gov.au/www/html/862-history-of-canterbury-suburb.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071121201633/http://www.schoolwebsites.com.au/web/Default.aspx?PageID=472&SiteID=29 to http://www.schoolwebsites.com.au/web/Default.aspx?PageID=472&SiteID=29
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070901081839/http://www.canterbury.nsw.gov.au/www/html/1355-whats-new-in-local--family-history----spring-2006.asp to http://www.canterbury.nsw.gov.au/www/html/1355-whats-new-in-local--family-history----spring-2006.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080209192217/http://www.sydneyline.com/Author.htm to http://www.sydneyline.com/Author.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719111921/http://www.cdp.org.au/fed/cvjac.asp to http://www.cdp.org.au/fed/cvjac.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720055546/http://www.msfa.qld.gov.au/content/venue.asp?name=Sleeman_History to http://www.msfa.qld.gov.au/content/venue.asp?name=Sleeman_History
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725204240/http://www.sydneyr.det.nsw.edu.au/showcase/wingara/mundinea.htm to http://www.sydneyr.det.nsw.edu.au/showcase/wingara/mundinea.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071121201633/http://www.schoolwebsites.com.au/web/Default.aspx?PageID=472&SiteID=29 to http://www.schoolwebsites.com.au/web/Default.aspx?PageID=472&SiteID=29
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:53, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I notice that in the last 24 hours the sentence "The school implemented an anti-religious radicalization programme in 2016" has been deleted twice by IP user 2001:8003:26c6:200:9990:13ef:3acb:f3a5 and reverted on both occasions. I have no argument about such reversions as no reason was given.However I had a look at the reference which reads "‘High risk of radicalisation’ Canterbury Boys High School in southwest Sydney was identified as a prime candidate for the introduction of a state government-funded program to counter violent extremism, after several students were identified as being at high risk of radicalisation. The school — whose 2013 dux, Samir Atwani, fled to Syria to join Islamic State shortly after graduating — was recently identified by the Department of Education alongside Punchbowl Boys High School as in need of specialist support to ensure that further students did not succumb to extremist behaviour, The Australian has learned." This makes no mention of any "anti-religious programmes" Hence I think the sentence in the article is misleading. I intend to again delete the sentence concerned with reason "Not a neutral statement and not supported by the reference".Fleet Lists (talk) 00:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , thanks so much for letting me know, and I apologise for not checking the reference. As you said, my reason for reverting was “no reason given”. Cheers, Skingo12 (talk) 00:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted sentence