lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Orthodox Catholic Church (disambiguation)

message: The Orthodox Catholic Church is one of three major worldwide Christian groupings (the other two being Roman Catholic and Protestant).  The Orthodox Catholic Church, the official name of what is otherwise known as the Orthodox Church (also known as the Eastern Orthodox Church), is a body of believers united by Faith and Sacrament.  It is comprised of those Church in communion with the Orthodox Churches of Constantinople, Antioch, Alexandria, Jerusalem, together with all other Patriarchates and Primatial Churches within Orthodoxy.  For more see Eastern Orthodox Church 
(Unsigned comment left 07:20, 22 September 2006 by user203.32.87.174) 
You know, if the Roman Catholic Church can totally hijack the "Catholic Church" Wiki article, I don't see why the Eastern Orthodox Church which is formally known as the Orthodox Catholic Church, being the 2nd biggest Christian denomination, shouldn't lay claim to the Orthodox Catholic Church article. The article as it is, or rather was, is a lot of stuff about very obscure wacky churches, instead of the 2nd largest Chrisitan group in the world. If this info wants a home, there should be a disambiguation page, like Orthodoxy has to put up with on the Catholic Church article.—
203.32.87.174 14:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  I was taught in grade school that the Eastern Orthodox Church does not consider itself "Eastern" and calls it self the Orthodox Catholic Church.  apart from this article, I have no evidence that was wrong.  This URL should be a redirect to Eastern Orthodox Church.  This article should be trashed, or fixed up and renamed, or fixed up and stuffed into some other article. — Randall Bart (talk) 20:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Orthodox Catholic Church
Talk:Radio Programas del Perú

message: Shouldn't the title be translated into English?--Jersey Devil 03:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I understand it with say "El Comercio" not being translated but have different feelings on other articles. You make a good point regarding "Radio Programs of Peru" sounding extremely strange (didn't think of it). Maybe you should bring this up in the Wikiproject Peru talk page to get reactions from the other members interested in this.--Jersey Devil 04:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Kate Silverton

message: Can anyone who knows about these things clarify the following sentence?: "Silverton went to Zimbabwe with Raleigh International, spending her gap year working for them in Egypt and Lebanon.[6]" Darllenydd proflenni (talk) 15:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need some clarity on where she went? 

message: She presented a programme called "The Lady Who Flew Africa" on BBC Four on October 30 2017. If anybody wishes to add more information about her media career, this could be put in the article, but I do understand if one wishes to say we should not add information on just about any programme that a person has broadcasted to an article. Vorbee (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The Lady Who Flew Africa

message: This source from The Daily Telegraph, published 8 May 2009 describes here as "38-year-old". If this is correct, she was born in 1970 or 1971. FreeBMD shows that her birth was registered in the September quarter of 1970: . Martinevans123 (talk) 10:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 
Talk:USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71)

message: This issue was corrected. My apologiesUpmostlizard (talk) 23:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: - No apologies needed. I believe you're referring to this edit...? And with it, you added; https://www.defense.gov/Resources/Insignia/  in your edit summary. I would suggest adding supporting refs directly to your edit in the article, or at least in a talk page post, like you created here. The only other thing I would add is that sometimes WP's style may not be the same as the article subject's style (sometimes, WP even seems to conflict with WP, see; here for example, in regards to ranks). Just make what you think is the best edit, and if needed, ask about/discuss it on the talk page after, it usually gets worked out. Hope this helps - wolf 05:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranks

message: The deployment of T.R. occurred on Sep 19 and was 159 days not 160 72.8.198.152 (talk) 17:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2001 Deployment
Talk:Baekse-ju

message: This needs to be fleshed out and combined with the Baekseju info in the article on Korean wine. Sources are http://www.visitkorea.or.kr/eng/info_db/shop/shop_detail.jsp?seqno=342 and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Baekseju&action=edit, but the sources and info in that article are probably better. Just wanted to get something up.
Palaverist 03:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The official brand name is romanized as "Bek Se Ju" on the label, so this article's title should be changed. Badagnani 00:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brand name spelling

message: Did the name exist as the name of a generic homemade liquor before the brand sold as "Bek Se Ju" was created? Badagnani (talk) 22:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Alabaster Caverns State Park

message: This article meets the requirements for class c in WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 04:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reassessed
Talk:Freedom, Oklahoma

message: I added a photo in the infobox.  I took the photo in 2011.  I hope wikipedians like it. Jaboyce (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo in Infobox
Template talk:Political parties in Sweden

message: I made the following criteria when updating the template.
*The party exist. (and)
**The party is represented in the Riksdag or the European Parliament. (or)
**The party received atleast 1000 votes in the last general election (at the moment Swedish general election, 2002). (or)
**The party has atleast 1000 party members.
If you find these criteria unreasonable in some way, please voice your opinion. Martin Ulfvik 09:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure about the first criterium. Feminist Initiative is not a party anymore, and therefore fail that criterium. However, they are represented in the European Parliament... Plrk (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for parties listed
Talk:Hinton, Oklahoma

message: Now, I'm not normally one for conspiracy theories, let alone sexually charged numberical references, but I was looking for low cost property across the country to reduce my cost of living. I came across an extremely cheap piece of property in Hinton Oklahoma and decided to look up the town on Wikipedia. After reading the article for a little while, I noticed a prevailance of the number "69". I think this article might be vandalized in some odd way. For example "2,169 people, 569 households, and 469 families." A population density of "269.6/km² (691.5/mi²)", 669 homes, a housing density of 69.6/km² 73.69%. The racial percentages all end in .69%, the incomes all end with 69... It's all over the aritcle, it's enough to drive someone insane. 24.254.187.237 08:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 69 Enigma 
Talk:Robbers Cave State Park

message: Not sure what to put in Founded field. Should it be the date that the name was changed to Robbers Cave State Park? http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/R/RO002.html says park was "originally Latimer State Park" and says "In 1935, under the supervision of the National Parks Service, the State Parks Division took control of the area." so I'm guessing park was founded in that year. --EarthFurst (talk) 00:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded in 1935? 

message: The article is now well beyond a "stub." It appears to merit at least a "C" classification. I have marked it so for the Oklahoma WP. Bruin2 (talk) 15:32, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification
Talk:Lake Thunderbird

message: I significantly reworked the page because it contained unverifiable data, contained advertisements, was not up to writing standards for a Wikipedia entry, and it contained page vandalism and sources to inappropriate links.  I intend to take some pictures of the lake and add them to the page entry at a future date.   Okguy (talk) 21:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Reworked

message: Numbers 8 and 10 link to sites that no longer work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.28.209 (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Really?  I live very close to the lake and have for nearly a decade and I've never heard of this.  Ever.  Sad that it even made it in.  Incredibly, all the citation links are dead.  What are the odds?  I fixed the template so that it actually shows up.  --plaws (talk) 20:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Oklahoma Octopus?

message: where James Garner was born, and the parcel of land his father owned, lies at the bottom of the lake. 68.229.214.195 (talk)05:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source for that information?--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 06:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. This is the 1915 state atlas, showing cleveland county and the location of the town of denver (below the second L in Clevenland. If you compare the location of the Little River and the other creek to the location of Lake Thunderbird today, you can see the towns approximate location in the middle of the Lake. Also, the Denver cemetery exist a few hundred feet south of lake Thunderbird, link 68.229.214.195 (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: The town of Denver
Talk:Conceptions of God

message: Now we have a new article Poles in mythology, Please see and include suitable improvements , if any, in article  Poles in mythology.
Rgds
Mahitgar (talk) 09:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poles in mythology 

message: First of all we should remember that "God" is just a name that we give to something which we consider the be unsurpassable ("God" has many names).   
To my humble opinion there is only one possible definition of God: "The all-encompassing". 
It corresponds with sayings like: "God is one", "All is part of God" and "God has a many faces".
Any other definition would diminish God and thus make God inferior to something greater.
From this point on it is save to say that God is "all that is and is not".
Which corresponds to the definition given by the Rig-Veda and fully integrates monotheism with pantheism.
Even more it integrates religion and science. For in this definition God is simultaneous with reality, with nature, whether it is measurable or not.
Now believing becomes knowing. And knowing God becomes following the royal path of Science (The narrow path followed by Euclid).
Of course we will never know that what we cannot measure properly, so our knowledge of God will always be limited to its properly measurable part.
There is no sense in trying to understand (or please?) what we cannot understand.
There is however sense for us as humans, being part of nature, to understand the measurable part of nature as good as we can and to live up to its laws. Among other things by subordinating the wishes and laws of mankind.83.98.229.18 (talk) 07:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The all-encompassing 

message: It seems like the article should introduce or mention Zoroastrianism. Zoroastrianism is one of the world's oldest religions, and it has Ahura Mazda, who is its supreme being. Zoroastrianism influenced the Abrahamic religions that followed it.
Jeffrey Walton  (talk) 00:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zoroastrianism?
Talk:Heshen

message: Okay. The consort make-up theory (excuse the pun) is quite interesting, and one of a few ideas behind Heshen's rise to power. I'm doubting it's credibility more and more, however. These folktales and myths spread like wildfire in Imperial China. Some idiot off the streets of Beijing could defame a prince with enough creativity. Please check into this or it will be deleted. Colipon+(T) 04:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Night of the Hunter (novel)

message: I just saw this again.The use of Black and White film, while also making the movie look dated as in the '30's, also gave the movie that Ansel Adams stark shadow quality induplicable (?) with color. The symbolism of the arched, church steeple-like attic room where Powell first kills; the  barn owl stalking, then mercilessly getting its bunny prey; the waving of Harper's  hair with the river grass, sleeplike in a trance;  are so well defined as to be a real thrill.   This is what horror/suspense movies are all about, not gore.70.176.118.196 (talk) 19:56, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B & W
Talk:Oklahoma Secretary of State

message: Why did Henry Bellmon (1963-1967) and Dewey F. Bartlett (1967-1971 and 1987-1991) appoint Democrats to serve as secretary of state?
Frank Keating, a conservative Republican in this era of winner-take-all politics, appointed the only three Republicans to hold the office of secretary of state. Poldy Bloom 04:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republican Governors with Democrat Secretaries of State?
Talk:Peace Pledge Union

message: ...without mentioning how this movement, started in the 1930s when European fascism was on the rise, viewed the ensuing war.  Did they rail against the draft in Britain and suggest Britain not defend herself?  Or did the organization keep a low profile?  A2Kafir 20:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've mentioned their support for appeasement in the 'thirties. The article needs a section on their advocacy of conscientious objection in the Second World War.  Marshall46 (talk) 22:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Marshall46 (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now not enough about the post-war period.  The article is heavily biased to the 1930s and 1940s. Pelarmian (talk) 09:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is incomplete... 

message: And makes it look as if the 1930s are the most important thing ever in the history of the organisation. Neonchameleon (talk) 18:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Were they not? According to the article, 135,000 men signed up when it was launched in 1934 but membership declined considerably in 1940. Judging by a JSTOR search, most historians who have written about the PPU focus on the 30s and WWII, which also reflects the focus of the article. It seems therefore that its greatest influence and importance was in the 1930s (when pacifism revived in the late 50s, it seems that the CND that was the main beneficiary). But if they were as important in the postwar period then I agree more should be included. More information about membership numbers throughout the years would also be helpful.—Britannicus (talk) 17:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is incredibly biassed 

message: Why is this article still rated Start Class? Roundtheworld (talk) 12:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start Class?
Talk:Picayune, Mississippi

message: Shouldn't Hurricane Katrina be a sub-heading of Geography? DevanJedi 04:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hurricane Katrina

message: Did anyone else notice the contradiction in the first paragraph? The 2007 census estimated the population to be 11,500 something, then the next sentence goes on to say the population is 30,000. That is a big difference, which is it? According to past census information just under 12,000 seems to be the more accurate estimate.  Where did you get the 30,000 estimate from Vesago?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.19.21.176 (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed--Work permit (talk) 00:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: "Picayune was added to the New Orleans metropolitan area in 2014." What? Picayune is NOT part of New Orleans by any means. Picayune is in Mississippi, and not in Louisiana. Cities like Slidell, Lacombe, Mandeville, Covington, Laplace, Pearl River, etc., are all much closer to New Orleans than Picayune is. 
New Orleans to Slidell, Mandeville, or Covington = 32 to 35 miles, roughly 32 to 38 minutes away with a giant lake in between them. New Orleans to Picayune = 52 miles, roughly 55 minutes away (not including traffic), which also includes the giant lake in between and even more interstate travel. Clearly someone failed Geography...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.175.13.45 (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the un-sourced text. Geraldshields11 (talk) 01:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picayune is NOT part of the New Orleans Metropolitan area.
Talk:The Also People

message: I've not yet been able to find the line in the audio (it appears not to be there), but in the book
:Arthur: "Incredible! The people...! The things...!"
:Ford: "The things are also people"
:Arthur: "The people... the ... other people..."
Morwen - Talk 12:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do recall it being in the TV series as well in the above form: but I haven't got my my tv series DVD (!!)  Morwen - Talk 13:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bulgarian Olympic Committee

message: i think we should mention that the term is also used in woot.com for "Bag Of Crap" sales. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.79.16 (talk • contribs) 
: At first I thought this was vandalism, but then I did a Google search and it seems like some people are really calling Bags o' Crap "Bulgarian Olympic Committees" on Woot.com. It's not relevant here, I believe, but you might list it in Woot (retailer)#Bag O’ Crap. Todor Bozhinov  → 08:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  no vandalizm, I just forgot my password here... I usualy use the hebrew version and its too bad you don't consolidate databases like users DB. user:Kiki --65.96.79.16 17:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ditech

message: Ditech.com → Ditech – Article needs to be titled after the website/company name, not its domain name. ~ Booya Bazooka 04:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 10:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV template without ongoing discussion per [[Template:POV]] instructions 
Talk:Michael Drosnin/facts

message: Here are three critical references I found: 
*http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/bib-code.html
*http://www.rsingermanson.com/html/drosnin.html
*http://cs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/dilugim/drosnin.html (Brendan McKay)
*http://cs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/dilugim/torah.html (Brendan McKay)
*http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2003/biblecode.shtml (BBC pro & con lks)
*http://www.wopr.com/biblecodes/ (Orthodox Jewish mathematician criticisms)
*http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0212/02/cf.00.html (CNN Crossfire, Drosnin responding to some criticisms)
-- Alex756 04:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:United States person

message: transcipt here. 
this is evidence the speech exists as a c-span tape for sale. here
WɔlkUnseen 04:59, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Non-US and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#Non-US until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 20:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Non-US" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:All You Zombies (song)

message: I have expanded the article making clear it was a single and indicating its chart position. Capitalistroadster 05:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The lyrics are mainly words from the bible. Just the word people was replaced by zombies. IMO this should be mentioned somewhere.
See: http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=3237
--Meillo (talk) 19:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics
Talk:Blythe, California

message: A better locator map should be added. —ScouterSig 18:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Frank Silvera

message: Silvera's character in The High Chaparral was named Sebastian Montoya, not Francisco. See
http://thehighchaparral.com/cast.htm ChaChaFut 05:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The statement "his 'race' didn't matter as B+W film stock didn't register his 'race' -- just the actor and his performance" is -- well, naïve is too weak a word.
Ethnic groups vary not only in skin color, but in the overall shape of their heads, noses, lips, etc; the color and texture of their hair and beards; and the relative lightness or darkness of their skin. I well-remember "The High Chaparral", and always assumed Frank Silvera was of Latin extraction, not African-American. (My cheap parents had a B&W set at the time.) You could never get away casting Dan Haggerty as a Russian, or Anderson Cooper (if he acted) as a Greek. Their ethnicities are so obvious that they're clear even in B&W.
As my addition to the article notes, skin color did make a difference. Frank Silvera would not, could not, have been cast as (say) the powerful head of a huge American corporation because, 40 years ago, no one would have believed it.
This article is an example (whether deliberate of accidental) of rewriting history, by denying very real discrimination.
I forgot... Great actor! WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 14:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "race" and film stock

message: Yeah, this: (his "race" didn't matter as B+W film stock didn't register his "race" -- just the actor and his performance) is insane nonsense.
By that logic, black film actors would have had a heyday before the color photography of the '30s. Paul Robeson would have been the king of Hollywood, not Clark Gable. Somebody remove that silliness.
Re his death, the film encyclopedia (Ephraim Katz) states he was electrocuted; I don't get that at all from what's here. There's got to be harder information somewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.34.145.82 (talk) 02:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  yeah/death
Talk:Transport in Tianjin

message: "The Outer Ring Road is the closest thing to a highway-level ring road, although traffic is often chaotic and sometimes more than chaotic."
Chaotic is an adjective that really does not and should not have a comparative or superlative form. If chaotic is the intended word here, then "sometimes more than chaotic" should be deleted. In any event, it seems to be a POV and at least the last phrase should be deleted or clarified. 71.131.226.22 05:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More than Chaotic?