Talk:1852 Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom

message: The lead section begins with a brief introduction of the Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom, its author, and its purpose. However, the lead section is lacking a set up for the rest of the article. The content in the article seems thorough because it highlights the important features of the development of the Constitution, such as its transition from the original constitution, its main sections, and the amendment in 1856. There does not seem to be information that is out of place or missing. This article is neutral and does not pose any bias. The links that I check do work and they seem reputable. I feel that there are some long paragraphs with only one citation where an additional resource could have been cited to back up some of the information. I did not notice spelling errors or grammar errors. The wording was very easy to read and no jargon was too complex for understanding. I liked the format of each topic header and then the specific information that correlated to that topic below it. The images are well-captioned and detailed. The chosen images give a good visual for what is being discussed in the article beside the image. In the talk page, I learned that this article is a part of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment and it is part of the Wiki Project Law. The talk page also reveals that this is just brief introduction to the entirety of the Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom and more research should be concluded regarding all of its sections. The article name was changed a few times, but this I did not find important. Overall, I liked the structure of the article, its simplicity, and the highlighted but brief background information regarding the Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom.GraceHerron21 (talk) 23:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Evaluation UCSF 2023

message: Please don't revert the move of your "Constitution of 1852" article to "1852 Constitution of the Kingdom of Hawaii." This name follows established Wikipedia naming conventions on Hawaii constitution articles, as can be seen on the Constitution of Hawaii article. Note that an article named "1840 Constitution of the Kingdom of Hawaii" already exists. I'm not moving the articles just to spite anyone, I'm doing it because Wikipedia articles need to be named consistently so no one gets confused. For example, Hawaii may not have been the only nation that established a constitution in 1852. If I'm not mistaken, New Zealand and France did as well. An article called "Constitution of 1852" could refer to any of these. Thank you very much. 青い(Aoi) 10:11, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: This article seems to cover the basics of the constitution of the Kingdom of Hawaii, but it does not state who wrote it, the events that led up to its' writing, or the application the document today. I added a source because your information was not cited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacey.teel (talk • contribs) 16:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of important information  

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kingdom of Hawaii which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 23:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress