Talk:United States Secretary of the Army

message: I'm not sure how to correct this, but as of 28 June 2019, Dr. Mark Esper is still legally the Secretary of the Army, even though he is the Acting Secretary of Defense. Ryan McCarthy is the "Senior Official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army. He is NOT the "Acting Secretary of the Army." Paratrooper450 (talk) 19:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: McCarthy

message: Since the Secertary of the Army falls under the Secretary of Defense, the former directly serves the latter. Thus should we list the Secretary of Defense at the time under "Served under" rather than the President? The military revovles around reporting to your direct superior, even though the President is more widely known and of course the Commander in Chief. Minutiaman 22:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest the way it currently is makes sense. From what I can tell, the change of the President often results in the change of Secretary of the Army, especially when there is a change in the political party the President comes from. A change in the Secretary of Defence is less likely to result in a change in the Secretary of the Army and I presume it's more dependent on what the President wants Nil Einne 12:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Served under" categorization

message: In the chart with the thumbnail pictures in the left column, the picture for Sec. Royall is incorrectly used for Sec. Augustine
Tashiro (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Picture For Sec. Augustine

message: Regarding General Sullivan as "acting" Secretary of the Army -- by law a civilian must be appointed to the position.  Seems that even an acting Secretary would require civilian status.  In this situation, we had Mr. Shannon, the Undersecretary, in the acting position.  He gets caught stealing lady's clothing and goes on leave.  Wouldn't the Assistant Secretaries of the Army or the Deputy Undersecretaries of the Army get the nod to serve as an Acting Secretary of the Army and Acting Undersecretary of the Army?  (With Sullivan, as Chief of Staff, filling the Secretary position, the notion of civilian control of the military gets undermined.)--S. Rich 04:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sullivan as acting Secretary? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on United States Secretary of the Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100607221710/http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r840_10.pdf to http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r840_10.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Note "secretaries of the Army" is uncapitalized because "secretaries" is plural, per MOS:JOBTITLES bullet 3 and table column 2, example 7: "Camp David is a mountain retreat for presidents of the United States." Any proposal for modification to the guideline should be posted at its talk page, WT:MOSBIO. —Eyer (If you reply, add  to your message to let me know.) 22:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: Buying their own uniforms and boots out of the little pay they get. 2601:846:C200:38F0:49E1:8647:6305:A8D9 (talk) 16:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do the poor soldiers have to still buy their uniforms and boots on the little pay they get.i had a son who served 20 years. Do don't lie to me