Talk:National Labor Relations Board

message: Despite the pretty good sources and decent writing, this article could be far longer and more in depth than it currently is.
A few things that need to be changed, just off the top of my head, are:
* An image of a plaque with the words "National Labor Relations Board" lacks a caption. Where is the sign and when was it put up? Is there anything else interesting about it?
* There is no history section (as mentioned above).
* There is no mention of the funding or budget of the NLRB.
* There is no section of criticisms or opinions on the (actions of) agency. What has organized labor thought of the board? The political Left? The Right?
* The page lacks depth generally.
If you are knowledgeable enough to pioneer a new section, please do, even if you only know enough to to add a sentence or two. Kaimakides (talk) 17:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is in need of serious expansion 

message: this page needs information on the history of the nlrb —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.233.136.180 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I rearranged a few small bits into a history and added info on Leon Despres.  But it still needs a better history section. Artemis-Arethusa (talk) 13:20, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs History

message: I made an edit to add a sentence about today's US Court of Appeals decision invalidating Obama's recess appointments.  Now the page is centered and has lost some formatting.  Can someone fix this? r3 (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centered?  How to get left justification back 

message: i flagged the page for issues I see : 
* lede, 
* tone/verbosity, and 
* undue length of sub sections within "history", for example 1935–1939 seems excessively long. 
* Modern history after 1965 is completely lacking.
I see two sections overlapping, but didnt fuse them (which would be best): one originally named "Obama admin controversy" and "Quorum issues". 
I renamed them without weaseling for plain precision. 
I moved one under history (2007-2013: Lack of quorum) and left one under the board members: 2007-2013: Unoccupied board seats.
--Wuerzele (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The most glaring problem at this point is the empty §. It is associated with the gradual collapse of collective bargaining in the US which was quite strong at the beginning of this period (1966) and essentially relegated to a rump, largely composed of government and a few feckless remaining trade unions by 2007. Collective bargaining utterly failed to make the transition to a higher skilled workforce which deplored collective action, mooting the purpose of the NLRB. However a list of the personnel of the board in this time should be easy to assemble and the provenance of same likely will adequately reflect these facts and the character of the larger process in this phase of the Capitalism whose name likely dare not be mentioned as the root cause, its tightening of control which in the earlier period was weak enough to have given rise to the board but subsequently relegated it having defeated collective action at its source. 98.4.124.117 (talk) 17:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Also such a list will likely show the gradual attrition that lead to the quorum issue in the next §. 98.4.124.117 (talk) 18:09, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  copy edits and expansion 1965- present needed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National Labor Relations Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131022015004/http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-announces-recess-appointments-key-administration-positions to http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-announces-recess-appointments-key-administration-positions
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: wrongfully removed 2600:6C51:627F:F53F:31EB:793C:1182:E0E7 (talk) 17:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I was wrongfully removed from the united state postal service and I have been on Lwop for ten months I'm out on retaliation  I need someone to talk to please  

message: Retaliation 2600:6C51:627F:F53F:31EB:793C:1182:E0E7 (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have the papers from the union who is willing to give me back my payback and transfer but still not at work and my benefits are about to be gone  

message: if possible I can be reached at 13237435100 I was working in the city of bell California  LANDC facility 2600:6C51:627F:F53F:31EB:793C:1182:E0E7 (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrongfully removed  after 18years of service