lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Six Arts

message: There are references to various dynasties.  Can we add approximate years for these for context?  RJFJR (talk) 19:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

message: The section contains a vague reference to the history of science in China, but not quite demonstrates the place of the Six Arts in it. I guess it needs to be improved.  NB Six Arts was the educational term first of all. --Shanghainese.ua (talk) 10:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developmets 

message: This article states that: "The Six Arts have their roots in the Confucian philosophy." However, the page on Confucius, which links to this page, states that he (Confucius), in his early life, "was educated at schools for commoners, where he studied and learned the Six Arts." This is, obviously, contradictory. I am no specialist in Chinese history, so I hope someone with more aptitude and knowledge is this field is willing to clarify this and adjust the article accordingly when and if needed? I reward with gratitude ;).
[page concerned]
--Graspofgreen (talk) 11:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 
Talk:Southern Weekly

message: There should be some mention in here of the cycling of editors that the Southern Weekly's experienced.  I don't have any information on the topic and can't add the needed material myself, but it's well known in the PRC that the leading figures of this paper have been repeatedly replaced for covering news issues that are considered inappropriate.  This considerably compromises its value as the most liberal newspaper in China, since the quality's dropped off in recent years. 202.119.55.8 (talk) 02:17, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Repeated Replacement of Chief Editors
Talk:State Administration of Foreign Exchange

message: Could someone tell me what can US$80 billions do to the Chinese poor? Or, how many tons of gold  US$80 billion can buy? Arilang   talk 05:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the current price of gold of around $1000/troy ounce, it's around 2,500 tonnes/tons. But the price is quite high at the moment and the market rather volatile. I don't feel this would be a helpful detail to add to the article. Gareth Jones (talk) 09:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly how many tons of gold US$80 billions can buy is irrelevant, but FT Times's report should be allowed to elaborated a bit more, since the actions of such a rich and powerful organization is not subjected to media or opposition party's watch, we wiki editors no need to paint a rosy picture for China. Arilang   talk 18:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: US$80 billions
Talk:Highest Science and Technology Award

message: To the best of my knowledge, 最高 literally translates to "highest" or "of greatest order/degree" but in most terms, including the Chinese name for the Supreme Court of the People's Republic of China, the term means "supreme." Unless there's a direct official translation that provides for "highest" I advise using "Supreme." Augend (talk) 05:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate Translation of "最高"
Talk:Subdistricts of China

message: Are there ethnic Subdistricts of the People's Republic of China? --Kaiyr (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In my work compiling List of township-level divisions of X, I haven't found any, and I doubt there are. GotR Talk 15:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:   Kashgar has eight subdistricts and Hotan has four several of which are names transliterated into Chinese characters from Uyghur Geographyinitiative (talk) 09:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ethnic Subdistricts
Talk:Taiwan Strait Tunnel Project

message: I don't really understand why "the tunnel's potential for aggressive military use remains a concern to Taiwan" because if anyone tried to attack the other side through the tunnel, all the defending side had to do is just closing the tunnel, then the attacking side would have no way to run. Has anyone heard about attacks through a undersea tunnel before? This kind of concern seems just ridiculous to me. DerekJoe 07:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aggressive Military Use? 

message: This article is sourced by two 404s. If this is merely a proposal thrown out there, and one not taken seriously at that, then maybe it does not yet deserve an article...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.14.173.51 (talk) 00:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion it is not a reason to kill an articel just because is sourced by 404s. The better method would be to find actual material to the topic and improve the article. There is enough material around, just google for the titel of the article.--Pechristener (talk) 07:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  no sources
Talk:Wei Liaozi

message: Just a reminder that the book "Weiliao Zi" is officially pronouced as "Yuliao Zi". The "Yu" is a special pronunciation under the two-character surname "Yuliao". Phonetic translation is so inconvenient at times...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.124.243 (talk) 17:49, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Zhangjiang Town

message: afaik, the whole of Pudong is on the eastern side of the city, no? 222.66.40.66 (talk) 10:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  should it be "eastern" side? 

message: one of the best unis of china has in
Suburb:Zhangjiang  - campus. 144.41.3.21 (talk) 10:25, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  campus
Talk:Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park

message: Thanks for cleaning up the citations.  I'm kinda new so I'm not that good at that part; I just tried to clean up the english and make it sound better.  Do you know of any other China related articles like this, with english needing cleaning up?Dounai (talk) 05:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Attack-class submarine

message: collins has tested AIP and has a unit on a pallet at osborne, it was found not to enhance the operational goal
probability at this stage is that the new sub is going to be hydrogen powered
i suggest the reference to AIP is qualified as to it not being existing common meaning
:Can you please provide some references which state that AIP has been ruled out? Everything I've seen says that it's still under consideration. Nick-D (talk) 09:25, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  air-independent propulsion  

message: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/national/why-dont-our-top-defence-officials-understand-what-submarines-are-on-offer/story-fni6ulvf-1227239418825?sv=6e94c0baf0b1979c6946ebcd19fd25c5
Moondyne (talk) 11:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia mentioned in news story

message: Three boats have so far been named. 
HMAS Obsolete
HMAS Noisy 
HMAS Scrap  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.110.67.11 (talk) 20:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: This needs to be retitled. It's an article on the Collins Class Replacement Program, of which the Attack Class was eventually selected. There should be a seperate article on the Attack Class itself. 45.248.48.136 (talk) 08:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This isn't an article on the Attack Class. 

message: With the cancellation of the French contract is this page still relevant? If it is kept then shouldn't the focus be on the AUUKUS Group, and the work that comes out of that? 人族 (talk) 03:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance? 

message: I'm confused about the cost. The $90 AUD billon figure has been widely quoted. However, looking at a Virginia class nuke sub, cost here (from wiki) is $3.4 billion USD. Twelve would be 40.8 billion USD, or 56 billion AUD.
So how did a conventional submarine cost out at 90? (1.6X nuke cost). Also I thought the $90 billion figure was just to purchase, not the life cycle cost.
:A 212 class cost is given as 560 million euro, or about 910 million AUD. Twelve would be 10 billion AUD or so. Obviously the Attack class is not the same as 212, but the cost difference is 9x Feldercarb (talk) 15:52, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The cost blew out from 50B at contract signing to 90B. I think that's a lifetime cost. Yes they were going to cost more than nukes of an existing design, let's just wait and see how RAN/Defence stuff this up to make the nukes  more expensive. Greglocock (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

text: As above, it's the life-cost of the program. So not just the platforms, but buildings, training, personnel, upgrades, maintenance etc projected out into the 2050s. Similar to the widely quoted US$1.5 trillion for the F-35 — IVORK Talk 00:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused about Cost
Talk:The 20th Century Fox Hour

message: So are individual episodes also TV movies, or are they simply just a tv episode? 
IMDb lists them as episodes but other places list them as movies, IMDb also however lists pilots as episodes now, while prior they were listed as movies and generally always considered as a tv-movie.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.251.19 (talk) 03:26, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  show or movie or both
Talk:Alastair Campbell, Lord Bracadale

message: The closest i found to a DoB is the statements that 
# He became a solicitor in 1979
# He taught school before that
The question is how long he taught, and/or studied law, before 1979. If he was 25 in '79 he was born in mid 1950s, if he was 35, mid 1940s.  Give us more if you can find it!  --Jerzy•t 06:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DoB 
Talk:Moolack Beach

message: Along the lines of these articles:
* Black's Beach
* Children's Pool Beach
* Kee Beach
: Notability threshhold is demonstrably low. This article ought to meet it easily. VigilancePrime (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, geographic features are almost always considered notable. Katr67 (talk) 02:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impetus 

message: The content of this seems more suited to WikiTravel. "Attractions" sections are not particularly encyclopedic. Katr67 (talk) 02:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Did I mention I need help wih this? (I put up what I could when I could. Hoping others will come and help... hence the  tag! VigilancePrime (talk) 02:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I wanted to give fair warning before I wipe out the attractions section... Katr67 (talk) 02:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, I always prefer enlarging articles, but I agree that the attractions ought to go (eventually). Perhaps the blue links therein can be retained (in a different form). Yes, I absolutely want help on it. I have a vision, but it's not like Newport Beach (different Newport) or something that has tons of refs available. Honestly, the references aren't that great either! But, it's a start, and that's what I was after. (Feel free not only to edit it around, but to get others involved!) I promise my feelings won't be hurt! VigilancePrime (talk) 03:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiTravel 
Talk:Nao Yazawa

message: This page is many years out of date. I wonder if someone with better knowledge of Japanese could bring over content from the Japanese entry? https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/谷沢直  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swanwonder (talk • contribs) 19:14, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: A good chunk of her website is in English so you can use that to help beef up her biography. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:11, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating
Talk:United Nations Federal Credit Union

message: --Pearrari (talk) 06:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled January 2008 

message: Please update the United Nations Federal Credit Union page.
Change request to UNFCU page 
  Information to be added: CEO-John Lewis 
  Information to be added: Executive Vice President-Pamela Agnone
  Information to be removed: CEO- William Predmore 
Explanation of issue: William Predmore retired on 31st December 2020 and John Lewis has been named as the new CEO of UNFCU as of January 1st 2021
References supporting change: https://www.unfcu.org/leadership/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerlouche83 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is being handled on Talk:United Nations Federal Credit Union. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

text: You aren't the only editor in the edit history that looks like a paid editor.  I reviewed the other 2 editors' contributions, they were removed on January 15th so I removed the "undisclosed paid" template.  When you say "restore the page" what revision are you wanting restored?  The last major removal on January 15th had the edit summary of "rm some unreferenced content – Wikipedia is built on independent reliable sources; NB: I'm assuming this thing may be notable, but have not been able to establish that myself".  If that edit is restored, then the undisclosed paid template will need to be restored, but not because of you.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested edit 

message: I am an employee of United Nations Federal Credit Union(UNFCU). I wish to make the below updates to UNFCU page. Kindly assist.
Thank you very much!
Change request to UNFCU page​
 Information to be added: CEO- John Lewis
 Information to be added: Executive Vice President- Pamela Agnone
 Information to be removed: CEO- William Predmore 
*Explanation of issue: William Predmore retired on 31st December 2020 and John Lewis has been named as the new CEO of UNFCU as of January 1st 2021
*References supporting change: https://www.unfcu.org/leadership/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerlouche83 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is being handled on Talk:United Nations Federal Credit Union. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

text: You aren't the only editor in the edit history that looks like a paid editor.  I reviewed the other 2 editors' contributions, they were removed on January 15th so I removed the "undisclosed paid" template.  When you say "restore the page" what revision are you wanting restored?  The last major removal on January 15th had the edit summary of "rm some unreferenced content – Wikipedia is built on independent reliable sources; NB: I'm assuming this thing may be notable, but have not been able to establish that myself".  If that edit is restored, then the undisclosed paid template will need to be restored, but not because of you.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request by Kerlouche83
Talk:Luchador films

message: The proper term for this genre of films is "Luchador film" not "Lucha film". Can someone please move this article to that page?
ThanksDoverD (talk) 06:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jehovah's Witnesses view of Jesus' death

message: It strikes me that everyone who voted on deletion for this long ago did so because they didn't care about the subject and on the other hand the people who chose to keep it have very anti-Jehovah's-Witnesses biases in their comments, just as the article itself is written. Jehovah's witnesses don't care what you write about them unless it is outright slander or libel. So the third catagory was of course missing; there were no Jehovah's witnesses who were in favor of keeping this article to have thier view considered sans the bias of fanatically anti-Jehovah's-Witness. As it stands, without the appropriate citations or references it is nothing more than anti-Jehovah's-Witness propaganda. Case in point, the reference to the description of a cross by a Jewish historian. It is moot as the it is the Latin Crux that is being considered there not the Greek Stauros, which is the real issue. Greek Stauros means Stake: what more need be said, unless you call Bible writers liars. I am neither JW or Christian, but I know deception when I see it. Once it is admitted what the original greek says, then it doesn't matter what the (fraudulent) Latin translations say about it. And that's what makes this article biased and useless, clearly written by anti-JWs. GabrielVelasquez (talk) 06:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the article and the AfD opinions look fine to me. Most of those expressing opinions in the AfD are Wikipedians who have been here for some time and edit many different subjects. Their opinions do not seem to be biased. Do you have some specific user you wish to have checked for sockpuppetry with evidence to be considered? If not, there is no reason to believe that there is any problem here. 88.80.200.138 (talk) 18:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:NFE2L2

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22020111. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  16:41, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: What was the basis for adding these particular articles to the Further Reading section out of the thousands that have been published on the topic? Seems that the selection was arbitrary and that the section isn't necessary or helpful. Rhode Island Red (talk) 22:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading section 

message: Please review text and references and provide comments about the addition of these details.
Clinical studies evaluating RTA 408 are currently underway for the prevention of radiation-induced dermatitis, treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, and prevention or treatment of ocular pain and inflammation following ocular surgery.  Other studies with RTA 408 are planned to evaluate its effects in patients with Friedreich's ataxia and mitochondrial myopathies.Paracelsus2809 (talk) 18:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at my edit summaries. That should answer your questions. Rhode Island Red (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The article as it stands now lists the only trial that is verifiably "underway", and even that is arguably trivial. What really matters is data from completed trials that has been analyzed by reliable independent secondary sources. There's nothing notable about a study that exists on paper only and that has not even accrued patients. These Reata press releases speak to news events; they are not scientific details about NRF. Of great concern is the trend that's emerging for this article to turn into an advocacy piece for Reata. That's not going to happen, as it runs counter to the policies and core principles of WP. Again, I'll advise you to respect WP:COI going forward, acknowledge your COI and refrain from editing the article (much less edit warring). Rhode Island Red (talk) 22:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clinical drug target Section
Template talk:Sagaing Region

message: *Request moving (renaming) this template from Sagaing Division to Sagaing Region in accordance with the 2008 Constitution and the edict of 20 August 2010. "Myanmar re-designates areas under new constitution ahead of election". As well as renaming all the other Burmaese/Myanmar Division templates, styled Template:Foo Division to Template:Foo Region. --Bejnar (talk) 03:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:A Man's Gotta Do

message: The director came to the Minneapolis International Film Festival, and said he didn't own the distribution rights, so you can't get the film anywhere.  I wonder if that's still true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfrankow (talk • contribs) 03:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rights 
Talk:Gippsland railway line

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ballarat to Daylesford railway line, Victoria which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 07:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Today the article has been subject of some copy and paste moves that were not made in compliance with the moving a page process. Editors can’t just copy and paste text from other to the other. In light of the consensus reached in the section above, the only way the article will be able to be moved is by way of a consensus being reached at a new requested move. Bagufleat (talk) 03:43, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2023
Talk:Bethpage Union Free School District

message: I am quite sure Charles Campagne could not have been finished until early 1960s. It was built during construction of I-135. On this page there are 3 photos labelled as being from the 1960s that show the school (unfinished) & the highway  - some earlier than others.
The land around CC was still used for farming at least to summer 1959 - probably later. I remember watching the sun set behind the old farmhouse for several winters - starting winter 1958-59, almost certainly 59-60, and 60-61 too. I know I-135 was not yet under construction there until some time after spring 1959, because I could walk there unimpeded. I know school was already there before Spring of 1963.
With the farmhouse still there in summer of 1959 (and later), the school could NOT have been completed in the 1950s. Maybe someone could look at the cornerstone too --JimWae (talk) 07:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vincent Bueno

message: I created this article since Vincent is the first Filipino and first Asian to win this coveted award.
--Florentino floro (talk) 08:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI: He is also the only winner ever. "Musical! Die Show" was a singular event in Austrian television, there are currently no plans for further shows. - 128.131.197.55 (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Filipino is grand champion in Austria's 'Musical! Die Show'

message: Is this supposed to mean he's a citizen of the Philippines? I can't find sources, but I presume he is an Austrian citizen, as he was born and raised in Vienna. If it's supposed to tell something about his ethnicity, it should be clarified to avoid confusion. --Brindt (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "a Filipino singer"
Talk:Jill King

message: This is NOT the same page that was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill King. Please don't delete it as a G4. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to admins
Talk:List of Alabama companies

message: This list is very incomplete, it would be better titled as List of Birmingham, Alabama companies.  Altairisfartalk 17:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One way to expand is to take a look at the wikidata query https://w.wiki/93WQ which retrieves companies or businesses headquartered in Alabama.  I've added several instances from this query. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Companies of Alabama?
File talk:Battle flag of the Confederate States of America.svg

message: Who on Earth named this file?! "the US Confederacy" ?! 68.39.174.238 (talk) 08:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lincoln certainly considered the Confederacy still part of the US, so it may be "technically" correct, though true believers would argue the point. How about the uploader was not from America, or not into the lore of the American Civil War, or did not alter the file name before loading? All could explain it. Kresock (talk) 07:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)