Talk:Ultrasonic cleaning

message: I have cleaned up the text, added some everyday instances where a reader may observe these devices at work, and given a general description of the way in which they are used. Reverted to a single US$ price (that seems to be the first one written, and exchange rates and profit margins vary) and coupled the price to a specific year. To my mind, this remains a stub. Things which I can think of being added include: Which kind of materials can or cannot be cleaned (limitations)? What cleaning fluids are used, and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages compared with other methods of cleaning? What are the precautions, dangers or risks involved (e.g. from ultrasound or from the fluids used)? Seejyb 21:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, for instance, is it dangerous to put your hand in the fluid? --Error (talk) 19:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

message: why become the actuators a pulsiting signal of a given frequency to its ultrasonic frequency?
I wanna know that because of every cleaner you can see the water vibrating!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saludacymbals (talk • contribs) 14:50, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: pulsating signal?

message: Do not merge: I do not think the Ultrasonic cleaning should be merged into Sonication. If anything Sonication should be merged here. Sonication and Ultrasonic cleaning are not the same thing. While the principle of Sonication is strongly related to ultrasonic cleaning, the uses and application are very different. --Mattarata 15:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. It makes no sense to merge sonication into ultrasonic cleaning. Ultrasonic cleaning is one of the several applications of sonication; sonication to drive chemical reactions is not an application of ultrasonic cleaning. The sonication bath is essentially the same, whether you want to degas a liquid, or you want to clean a pair of spectacles. The difference is the cost (everything from a lab supply house is expensive), function (temperature control, timer), construction (plastic versus SS) and the attendant solvent resistance. I feel a merge is necessary to prevent a content fork. --Rifleman 82 15:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: The Ultrasonic bath as it stands now should be merged into something or heavily modified. 
WikipedianYknOK 05:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: An ultrasonic bath is used for many other activities other than cleaning. For example I use them on a regular basis to increase particle suspension uniformity prior to electrophoretic deposition. Would it be possible for someone to make a page as appropriate?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.39.155 (talk) 17:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultrasonic Bath 

message: <I>"A warm solution is best, at about 50-65°C"</I>  Why?  Is that even true?
63.99.207.1 (talk) 21:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warm? 

message: ProBlindcleaner (talk) 04:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultrasonic Blind Cleaning 

message: How safe are ultrasonic cleaners for operators?  What would happen if you put your hand in one while it was operating? RJFJR (talk) 19:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety? 

message: Is ultrasonic cleaning the equivalent of hydronsonic cleaning? Should there be a section on hydrosonic cleaning, within this section, or should it be mentioned? Should hydronsonic cleaning have its own section?
Natural (talk) 12:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hydrosonic Cleaning

message: Ultrasonic bath is only used for cleaning or anything else?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.252.5 (talk) 07:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  only used for cleaning?