lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saab 32 Lansen

message: Swedish sources call the Lansen's speed at 1200 km/h in the J32B fighter version.
But many non Swedish sources insist on a speed of 988 km/h or Mach 0,93. An educated guess is that alot of English sources has confused the Lansen with the J29 Tunnan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkwand (talk • contribs) 17:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lansen's Speed

message: This article has a lot of factual errors and would benefit from a general overhaul and verification of sources. Most obvious is a recurring confusion between A 32 and J 32. The time perspective is also incorrect with several mentions of the A 32 being introduced into service as early as 1953. The first production aircraft was in fact delivered in 1955 and introduction into active service did not happen until 1956, May 1956 to be specific. One paragraph mentions a production aircraft breaking the sound barrier on October 25th 1953. This is also incorrect, the event occurred on the mentioned date but the aircraft was the first prototype, 32-1 which was the sole flyable 32 at the time. Regarding development there was no "P1150", SAAB never used any British style "P" designations. 1150 was the number assigned to the final design concept that once approved was designated "SAAB 32" by SAAB as well as  by the Air Board before the first prototype was built. Also, the first drafts for a new jet strike aircraft to replace the B 18B were made as early as 1946. Over the following two years the requirements were changed repeatedly and the specifications mentioned in the text of this article reflects the final specs, as of 1948. At this time there was no mention of the Rb 04 since this missile had yet to leave the drawing table. Instead, the requirements called for use of an earlier air-to -surface missile called the Rb 303. The use of computerized design calculations was applied for the entire aircraft and not merely the wing design. The company name itself is by the way spelled "SAAB" before 1963 (I may be mistaken about the exact year, it could be 1964) when it was re branded as "Saab AB". As for the choice of engine the Avon was not considered until late in development since the original intentions were to use the Swedish made STAL Dovern. When this engine was delayed (and ultimately cancelled) the Avon was brought in as a stop gap solution. As the final fate of the Dovern project became apparent towards the end of 1952 or early 1953 SAAB finally settled on the Avon instead. Per80 (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul needed 

message: "Lansen" means "The Lance". The word is in English "lance" and in Swedish "lans".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.3.63 (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lans / Lansen 

message: '4 × 30 mm ADEN cannons 900 rounds each'
900 rounds per gun is completely impossible. As an comparison a Hunter had 150 rpg. I don't have any source but a friend states that it was 150 rpg = 150 rpg 'source needed'?
Cheers
Hans  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.169.150.8 (talk) 07:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ammunition
Talk:Saunders-Roe A.36 Lerwick

message: This ought to be at Saunders-Roe Lerwick as common name used in preference to any combination of design number and service name.GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 
Talk:Saunders-Roe Princess

message: Why is the cruise speed higher then the maximum speed? Scottanon (talk) 21:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airspeed 

message: Saro designed a landplane cargo version of the Princess, rather like a greatly enlarged Douglas C-133 Cargomaster, but of course, it was never built.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.68.219 (talk) 09:44, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Mention added to the article - it was a proposal by Saro to rebuild the three existing Princesses into landplane troop-carrier/cargo aircraft.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK - I had forgotten about the Tynes. Six of them IIRC.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.68.219 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cargo landplane version 

message: Do we have any source for the engine ratings of the Coupled Proteus?
The current article is giving the wrong figures - around 2,000 hp - which is a figure for a single Proteus (and on the low side). If we're going to say there are four of these, then the figures ought to be for the coupled engine, not the single (these aren't simply two engines in a box either). Even assuming that the engine cores are identical, was there any de-rating for the gearbox?
Claimed figures vary, but 6,400 hp seems most plausible, within the optimism of 1951 . Also the actual engines fitted were a mixed bag of non-standard builds, and some are supposed to have been far from new development hacks. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coupled Proteus ratings?
Talk:Saunders-Roe SR.53

message: I do not think the following statement is correct "...Maurice Brennan, formerly of the Cierva Autogiro Company which had been taken over by Saro". Based on articles in Flight, specifically :
*
I think that Maurice was already working for Saro when they got Cierva's helicopter business. Any one know of any other information that corroborates the original statement? Did Maurice spend a period working directly for Cierva?
KreyszigB (talk) 20:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It struck me as wrong when I first read it, and I edited it a bit. I think that Flight article is conclusive enough. GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maurice Brennan 
Talk:Savoia-Marchetti SM.81 Pipistrello

message: *S.81 specs 
*Datasheet about S.81
Alázhlis (talk) 22:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inoperable links 

message: I understand Savoy was annexed into France somewhat recently.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.239.132 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs a byword on why the craft were named "Savoie-Marchetti"
Talk:Rutan Boomerang

message: The title implies that the Boomerang is built or designed by Scaled Composites.  This is not true, although Burt Rutan was the president and founder of Scaled Composites, the Boomerang was a personal project entirely designed, funded and built by Burt out side of his day job. Bobwanwiki (talk) 17:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship of aircraft to Scaled Composites 

message: The section "Design and Developement" sounds quite euphoric to me. This should be backed up with additional sources or presented in a more objective style.
Considering the fact that there were only a hand full of asymetric aircraft designs in history one might be sceptical if the aircraft reached the design goals stated at the beginning? 217.224.45.179 (talk) 21:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View? 

message: restored in 2011, but when was it originally designed and built? The one fact the article really, really needs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.161.134.188 (talk) 07:44, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  When? 

message: The 2011 image of the interior of the plane shows an unfurnished interior. The caption of this image further states that the interior was never furnished. However, on the aircraft's website, several images have since been posted which show that the interior was indeed furnished sometime later. An exact date was not provided on these photos, but this March 2015 blog post seems to also show the furnished interior. Therefore, it can be reasonably assumed that the interior was completed some time between 2011 and 2015.
I would add these links to the article as sources, but I'm not sure if they meet the proper guidelines. Could anyone help confirm whether or not these pages from the site would be considered acceptable? Waterfire (talk) 20:17, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the Caption on the Image of the Cabin
Talk:Scaled Composites Proteus

message: It sounds like only one of these was built, but it never says that explicitly.--75.80.19.125 (talk) 23:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many? 

message: The introduction stated that the Proteus can fly at 65,000 feet for 18 hours; however, later in the design and development section the obtaining of an FAI record altitude of 63,245 is referenced. Presumably the initial claim is incorrect :) 134.223.116.200 (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off Altitude 

message: Could anyone of you aircraft-engineer-cracks explain please how the design functions? Why do you need a tandem wing to reach the high efficiency claimed for the airplane? Why these pods with the fins? Why does this not just produce enhanced drag?
My wish is the same for all articles about rutan-designs which you thankworthily put up to the net...!
--HilmarHansWerner (talk) 22:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: explaining the design efficiency?!
Talk:History of aesthetics

message: The history section of the main Aesthetics article article should be merged here. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: I have problems with merging the two. 1)- The main article is considered "Aesthetics" and needs a history section. 2)- The section in the main article is better referenced than this large, one sourced and possible copied, article. I have not looked up the source but I have suppositions that there is plagiarism, original research, or both. I would have to look more closely at the main article section and it might be as bad but surely can't be worse. 3)- This is a subject that needs expert editing and probably should be tagged "Expert-verify" or the like. 4)- Merging the two at this time will be moving some verified content into a one-sourced, non-referenced article and will only accomplish making it look better prima facie.
*This article is misclassified, as far as I am concerned, and should not have made it out of "start class" with such poor referencing and this needs to be addressed before expansion by merging. Otr500 (talk) 11:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I had proposed a major re-structuring of the article on aesthetics in general and it's been proposed to merge the historical content of that article into this one which I will do in the next days (I don't hope weeks). I am astonished that both of these pages attract so little attention, but I think that they deserve a major update. AeAnBr (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Major import of information from [[Aesthetics]]
Talk:Turandot (Gozzi)

message: This is a rather nice essay of the "compare and contrast variety", but not a very good encyclopedia article.  As a wikipedia article, is should stick more to concrete facts, than analysing abstract concerts.  Since there is already a good entry on the Puccini opera, the focus on the article should perhaps be the Schiller play, or if the story has a basis previous to Schiller, on the legend of Turandot, and how it developed previously to Puccini.  Info in the article might include:
* Schiller's inspiration for the play
* Info about the premiere of the play
* The structure (e.g. # of acts), characters, brief plot summary
* If the article does focus on more than just the Schiller play, other Turandot's in music (Carl Maria von Weber and Hindemith).
As for the current article (which is quite good), maybe it should be 
condensed, or separated into another article about the character of Turandot.
=== Schiller vs Puccini ===
AS long as the article is contrasting the Gozzi and Schiller version, shouldn't it go on and contrast the Schiller and Puccini versions?  Joseph Kerman in OPERA AS DRAMA criticized the finale as "a happy ending for the two characters who least deserve it", which certainly doesn't match Schiller's point of view as described in this article.
CharlesTheBold 04:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: AS long as the article is contrasting the Gozzi and Schiller version, shouldn't it go on and contrast the Schiller and Puccini versions?  Joseph Kerman in OPERA AS DRAMA criticized the finale as "a happy ending for the two characters who least deserve it", which certainly doesn't match Schiller's point of view as described in this article.
CharlesTheBold 04:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schiller vs Puccini 

message: Seems like the "essay" was edited to nothing.  It's now a stub, and one paragraph doesn't even make grammatical sense.  Whatever this used to be was probably better than what remains.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.38.111.142 (talk) 08:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited to nothing 

message: I'm slightly confused by the hyperlink to universalism, which seems to me not to be the same universalism at all:  the author seems to write about dramatic universalism (whatever that may be), but the linked article is on moral universalism. Katiehawks (talk) 05:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romantic prinicples 

message: Why is even a basic summary of the play lacking in this article? That doesn't seem very useful to anyone. Please correct! 173.89.236.187 (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. (Edit: this is not, for opera fans, necessarily a “low-importance” article :))ELSchissel (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary of play missing from article?
Category talk:People from Yorkshire

message: Do we need this category as well as :category:natives of Yorkshire, if so what is the difference? --Vince 22:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It still leaves me wondering if two categories are required. If so, then we need people from categories and natives of categories for all places. A good example is :category:people from London but there is no :category:natives of London. --Vince 10:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Niðavellir

message: Merge in the other direction, to Nidafjöll.  Gene Nygaard 22:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Because that title currently doesn't have an 'ð' or do you have any input on the mythological geography? There are a lot of these tiny stubs on locations in Norse mythology but I don't see any evidence that Niðavellir and Niðafjöll refers to the same place. Maybe the whole lot should be merged into one big list but until then I don't see any point in merging these two. Haukur 23:02, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

message: There is a lack of citation that Myrkheim is the same as Niðavellir.  Even more strangely, "Myrkálfar" are talked about in the article for Svartálfaheim rather than on this page, so it seems arbitrary that Myrkheim is linked to this page but Myrkálfar is linked there. Perhaps Myrkheim and Myrkálfar should be on their own page, especially since there is no scholarly consensus about whether Myrkheim refers to Niðavellir or Svartalfheim or both, and whether Myrkálfar refer to dwarfs/dwarves or dark elves or both.--Webspidrman (talk) 03:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Myrkheim?

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Vanaheimr - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 21:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Osaka Tower

message: It has been suggested that this article be merged with another article covering the exact same topic.
Since it was such a minor job, I have merged them and put a redirection link from the other page to this.
I've tried to merge all the facts from the other article into this as well as possible.
Nothing should be missing, but if you think so, check the changelog of the Osaka ABC Tower.
Ion seal 22:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging articles
Talk:Let's Go to Prison

message: There's rumours that this film has new music from Queens of the Stone Age on the soundtrack - anyone got any good sources for this? Here shows pictures of a couple of Queens in the studio, and QotSA are mentioned here as well.--*smb 19:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it's made clear that the two characters are homosexual, and in a romantic relationship. Why does the article feel the need to remind us this so many times in the end of the synopsis? 24.17.72.12 (talk) 01:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The romantic Duo

message: Seems hasty, maybe rewrite one day —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.121.97 (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Entire Summary
Talk:Search and Rescue (1977 TV series)

message: What is the source for "Search and Rescue: The Alpha Team" being the original title of the series? When it first aired in Canada -its county of origin - it only carried the title Search and Rescue and this is supported by the book TV North. We should not use the US title. 68.146.8.46 13:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Serbian Volunteer Corps (World War II)

message: Retreat and demise section is bery long, can it be split up?Sam Hayes 23:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: what is your reliable published source for that? The Serbian Volunteer Corps were German auxiliaries. It was formed as a Zbor party army in Sep 41, it's detachments were initially subordinated to German divisions, had German liaison officers attached to them and could not move out of their allocated areas without German permission. Then they were placed under the direct command of the German commander in Serbia and received arms and ammunition from the Germans. Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Retreat and Demise

message: Can full citations be provided for these short citations please? Thanks, Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 05:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nigel and Littlejohn
Talk:Time of the Gypsies

message: I doubt whether it's accurate to say that Dom za vešanje was filmed in Romani and Serbo-Croatian. Most (in fact, almost all) of the film is in Romani; the only part of the film in Serbo-Croatian is the part where Danira and Ahmed talk to a doctor and nurse at the Klinični center Ljubljana. 
In fact, it would actually be more accurate to say it is in Romani and Italian, since there are more Italian lines than Serbo-Croatian ones (e.g. the scene where the police raid Ahmed's camp in Milan, the scene with the Romani beggar-woman in Rome). --Kuaichik 02:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romani AND Serbo-Croatian? 

message: Does the teenager have magical powers, telekinetic powers, or are his powers imaginary? The summary confusingly gives the first two options without explanation, but I suspect that the last option is more likely to have been the intention of the film maker. And what is the "magic-realism" which is referred to?Royalcourtier (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic, telekinesis or imaginery? 

message: The synopsis needs a significant rewrite. The tone and style are over-simplistic missing most of the essential messages of the movie. As it stands right now it only recounts the actions, failing to make connections between them  and to the over-arching themes of the movie, especially the idea that with this movie one enters a very different world with its own rules, mythology, and ideas about life, death, love, etc...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.60.215.85 (talk) 14:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis
Talk:Patrick Tull

message: There have been reports on discussion groups and mailing lists that Patrick Tull died of cancer on 23 September 2006. While I have no doubt that this is true (and am most uncommon sorry to hear it), a good source is required before the artticle may be updated to reflect this. See WP:BLP for more. --Jumbo 23:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick Tull, Dead? 

message: Also worth mentioning are Tull's readings (for Recorded Books) of Ellis Peters's "Brother Cadfael" mysteries.
DMTate 02:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother Cadfael
Talk:Georgia's 11th congressional district

message: I trust that this article is not typical of the type. There is no indication of the nation, or the type of "political unit" (my description as, being a limey, I know of no better), of the subject. Wikipedia is not an American encyclopedia, but one read by English readers from all over the world*. Try writing articles on that basis, please!LessHeard vanU 23:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that this article needs work (good point about needing a general definition of a U.S. congressional district as well), but this district was one of those recently changed. I haven't been able to find an updated map or I would define the Georgia counties comprised by this district.  Since there are 159 counties in the state of Georgia (second to only Texas in the US) even slight changes in districts can significantly redefine the area. Cheers.--Roswell native 22:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Link to new map added. -Tobogganoggin talk 03:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Al-Walid ibn Uqba

message: This article could as good be deleted, it is hardly understandable and heavily (apparently anti-sunni) biased.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.0.90.185 (talk) 01:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya! This is rubbish! Nothing useful! Written just to ignite anger and enmity.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdfqwert123456 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: More to the point, it is written with bias. The subject is repeatedly described as "wicked". Besides this, there is no biographical information about him beyond the assertion that a verse of the Qur'an might have been written about him and that he was once drunk at prayers.Grace has Victory (talk) 01:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Defense of the Adzhimushkay quarry

message: We've been introduced to 'Colonel P.M. Yagunov', but who was 'Povazhniy'? He pops up as the commander of the Small Catacombs but other than that I'm not sure. I belatedly saw his initials (M.G.) [I'd already pressed 'save'] in the info box, but was he a member of the Red Army, (if so what rank), a partisan or what?
RASAM (talk) 20:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Who him?

message: I commented out the article per  per WP:V -- uncited from 2013. It was also full of POV language and badly written, such as section heading "Pre-history" (?). The article needs to be rewritten. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I uncommented it back. I am taking responsibility to verify and 'footnotify' the text. Please be patient; the text does not contain obvious blunders, but unfortunately my brain does not allow me to work fast these days. - üser:Altenmann >t 01:42, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, I'm glad someone is taking the time to improve the article. So much of Wikipedia's WWII content is garbage (see my list of Problematic WWII content); I think I was feeling a bit overwhelmed back in March when I did it. :-) K.e.coffman (talk) 07:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commented out
Talk:Soyuz TMA-9

message: *I think that the new way to present the crew adds useless complication. Hektor 14:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New crew list
Talk:Treason Act 1695

message: "When in the 1990s a British newspaper attempted to have James Hewitt prosecuted under the Treason Act 1351 for an alleged affair with Diana, Princess of Wales, no charges were brought"
What was he being prosecuted for?  I understanding that "violating" a princess constitutes treason under the 1351 Act, but I would interpret "violating" as meaning rape rather than a consensual affair.  Is the legal definition of "violate" different? -86.136.27.212 00:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Album articles by quality/14

message: The album listed here as Kaleidoscope World is now at Kaleidoscope World (Swing Out Sister album) - there is also an unassessed album at Kaleidoscope World (The Chills album). Grutness...wha? 00:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link is now dab page