Talk:Jamaat-e-Islami (Pakistan)

message: This is the responsibility of Media Section of Jamaat e Islami's Media Section to enhance and sustain the credibility of this article, Reference to the Freedom of Speech, jamaat e islami voice can be heard at www.jamaat.org.
This Article has been forwarded to Jamaat e Islami's Media Section, HQ in Mansoorah Multan Road, Lahore Pakistan
Tel: +92-42-5432391-5 & 5419520-4
Fax: +92-42-5432194
Director Foreign Relations
Mr. Abdul Ghaffar Aziz
Regards
Mohammed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mqazi (talk • contribs) 19:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Important Note

message: "While persisting to his Anti-Pakistan Ideology Maududi writes in one of his books,"If we have ever uttered a single word in the favor of creation of Pakistan, it must be proved with references". That is why Jamat-e-Islami also did not support Muslim League,the only representative of Muslims of India, in core ellection of 1945-46."
The Court of Inquiry report published in 1954 states on its page 243 "A Government which is not based on the Jama’at’s conception, as for instance where it is based on the conception of a nation, is, according to Maulana Amin Ahsan Islahi, a Satanic Government, and according to Maulana Abul Ala Maudoodi himself kufr, all persons taking part in such Government, whether as administrators or otherwise, or willingly submitting to such system being sinners. The Jama’at was, therefore, professedly opposed to the Muslim League’s conception of Pakistan, and since the establishment of Pakistan, which it described as Na Pakistan, has been opposed to the present system of Government and those who are running it. In none of the writings of the Jama’at produced before us there is to be found the remotest reference in support of the demand for Pakistan, and. on the contrary, these writings which contain several possible hypotheses, are all opposed to the form in which Pakistan came into being and at present exists." http://www.thepersecution.org/archive/munir/p243.html REPORT of THE COURT OF INQUIRY,constituted under PUNJAB ACT II OF 1954 to enquire into the PUNJAB DISTURBANCES OF 1953, Published 1954
Maudidi, was not supporting the formation of a Muslim state out of India. This was for the better cause of the Indians. History has shown that he was right. After the formation of Pakistan, there has always been tension between India and Pakistan. Also the condition of Muslims in India is in a woeful plight. And Pakistan has never been an Islamic state. More over some un-educated, ill cultured Muslims  in Pakistan have tried to put Islam in a bad light.  This is the net result of India and Pakistan seperated.
Had India been not devided the History of India would have been different. The division of India was only supported by Mohammed Ali Jinna's Muslime League (as he felt he couldn't go well with Nehru) and by the extreme right Hindu fundamendalists - the RSS (Rashtriya SwayamSevak Sangh) who killed Mahathma Ghandhi for not supporting a devided India.
That was added to the article by anon contributor . Can someone please verify/clarify? --AI 06:37, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jamaati opposition to Pakistan 

message: "The Jamat is very active in the field of Dawah, Tarbiyah and Tanzeem almost in all the areas of Pakistan." This is the English wikipedia, correct? This sentence has no meaning to an English speaker. Mustaqbal 07:12, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urdu Wikipedia or English? 

message: mentions a JI branch in Sri Lanka. The question again pops up, is JI an international/regional organization or are the different groups independent bodies? --Soman 23:36, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sri Lanka 

message: Please refrain blanking valid content provided by other editors. If you feel some text is inappropriate, please discuss it here, so we can aim for a consensus. Veej 01:39, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *rather than becoming involved in an edit war, perhaps we can discuss this. One of the sections that you removed is; "Jamaat publishes hardline demands of the Pakistan Government". This section is quoted directly from Jamaat's website & referenced. It provides a much needed insight into the agenda of Jamaat. 1) What is your objection to this? Veej 02:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 2) You also removed this link, Asian Tribune - Militancy in Pakistan. The Asian Tribune is a quality newspaper published by World Institute for Asian Studies. The article was by Mohammed Yousuf, a notable analyst & Lawyer. He has written extensively on current affairs, with reference to South and Central Asia. The article is intelligently written, insightful & relevent. What is your objection to this? Veej 02:54, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Siddiqui]]'s edits 

message: I have protected the article until this edit war can be resolved. - RoyBoy 800 03:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Jamaat-e-Islami now BLOCKED because of EDIT WAR
I have posted comment / questions at Talk:Jamaat-e-Islami#User:Siddiqui.27s_edits for you. Are you interested in a discussion? Veej 04:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'discussion' moved from user talk pages to here. 

message: The administrator who protected this article cited an edit war between two people.  I think a more productive action would have been to tell the two editors to behave themselves.  I do so now in unprotecting.  Be good. --Tony Sidaway 16:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotecting

message: Is that group related or the same as this one, or do they merely have the same name? Шизомби 13:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a different name, Jamiat-i-Islami, and it's incorrectly redirecting to Jamaat-e-Islami, I created a new page for the Afghan Jamiat-e-Islami. Waqas.usman 09:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Jamiat Islami]] of [[Burhanuddin Rabbani]]?

message: I just came across that article.  The article says almost nothing.  Would someone here be able to expand upon it or merge it into this article.  Or should it just be deleted?  --JGGardiner 04:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mansura Jamaat]]

message: This article seems to be heavily influenced by anti-Jamaat rhetoric and POV. For sure Jamaat has something to say to all of these allegations and they need to be heard rather than being dismissed. Just calling someone Jamaati shouldn't be enough to dismiss their arguments. Wikipedia should not be a playground for those who can bully others with name-calling. It almost seems as those accusing others of "extremism" and "closed-mindedness" are unable to accept expression of other views. In addition, this article is badly written, terribly formatted, and uneloquently presented. -- Aslamt 07:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that there's been numerous edits since this was posted, would it be ok to remove the POV tag?  If not, please clarify which areas of the article need attention. Thanks, --Oscarthecat 19:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. --Aslamt 22:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: This source is used in the (currently) fourth paragraph of the article.  It seems to be a blog.  In addition, it seems to say nothing about terrorism and the quote, "The statements of the Jamaat-e-Islami chief in Pakistan instil in them the spirit of jihad and martyrdom because they are told that India (and also Russia and the US) is an enemy." is made without any other background, i.e. they don't quote the alleged statements or even name the "chief".   Generally, I would like to remove the entire paragraph but to avoid an edit war, I would like anyone who supports it to please give us some more background on it.  Thanks.  Fanra 02:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Creed of Theo-Fascism

message: Is Jamaat-e-Islami and Jamaat-i-Islami the same?  I'm assuming they are exactly the same thing, with the difference in spelling merely due to the problem of translating it from Arabic to English.  Fanra 02:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite right there, it is just an issue of transliteration. I would assume the spelling as provided on their official website (Jamaat-e-Islami) would be the most appropriate. --Aslamt 22:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jamaat-e-Islami / Jamaat-i-Islami

message: JeI is was part of the ruling coalition in Bangladesh for five years, and it's beginnings were in India. Shouldn't Bangladesh and India have more space on the article about this party spread over quite a few countries? Aditya(talk • contribs) 06:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bangladesh and India 

message: The following:
"While JI states, "The Muslim woman is accorded full spiritual and intellectual equality with man...", this does not include equality before the law.[3]"
Should be changed. The reference doesn't mention anything with regards to the status of women or men before the law. The statement is misleading, and not properly referenced. Please remove the "this does not include equality before the law." part.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wasabi salafi koonkati (talk • contribs) 05:28, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look under the "Women's rights" section, you see that it contains several examples of how JI does not include equality before the law for women.  The statement is not misleading.  I can take some references from that section and add it to that line for you.  Fanra (talk) 12:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased wording 

message: As this is an English wiki page, I'd be interested in an overview of Jamaat-e-Islami's relations with Western nations, such as published doctrines, decrees, policies, or transcribed verbal statements by Jamaat's leaders. Especially regarding the U.S.71.129.172.91 (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Relations with the West

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "satp":
From Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi: 
From Lashkar-e-Taiba: 
From Sufi Muhammad: 
From Deobandi: 
From Islamic terrorism: Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), from South Asia Terrorism Portal
Reference named "abbash":
From Deobandi: 
From Baitullah Mehsud: Abbas, Hassan."A Profile of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan". CTC Sentinel 1 (2): 1–4. January 2008.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090616085917/http://www.thenews.com.pk:80/top_story_detail.asp?Id=20372 to http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=20372
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140903120850/http://www.jamestown.org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=497&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=180&no_cache=1 to http://www.jamestown.org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090514060717/http://www.cfr.org/publication/15422/pakistans_new_generation_of_terrorists.html?breadcrumb=%2Fbios%2F13611%2Fjayshree_bajoria%3Fgroupby%3D1&hide=1&id=13611&filter=456 to http://www.cfr.org/publication/15422/pakistans_new_generation_of_terrorists.html?breadcrumb=%2Fbios%2F13611%2Fjayshree_bajoria%3Fgroupby%3D1%26hide%3D1%26id%3D13611%26filter%3D456
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Someone tried to change the logo in the infobox without explanation.  The existing logo uses :File:Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan Logo.svg, which is fair use. The logo the other user wanted is :File:Jamaat-i-Islami Pakistan logo.png, which is a file that user uploaded on Commons, which has uncertain copyright status.
The :File:Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan Logo.svg is used on Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan's Facebook page.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:47, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: I'm not seeing anything in the article that supports categorizing Jamaat as third positionist. In heritage and content it seems like an Islamist/traditionalist party, rather than the more secular/revolutionary messaging associated with third positionist parties (e.g. Ba'ath). 
73.177.233.86 (talk) 06:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Position? 

message: Jamaat-e-islamis popularity has grown over the years so the page needs to be updated, with a section on criticism and policies to be added
also the article focuses on jamaats political role in pakistan while it is present in many countries. Jamaat also doesnt completely focus on politics and also has other roles. Hafiz naemm has become the new amir this also has to be updated. The reforms and policies tht jamaat prposes to bring should also be added. 141.164.179.128 (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to be updated