lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Snapshot (computer storage)

message: I agree this article is a bit of a jumble and needs some structure :
* Snapshot (general description i.e. point in time copy)
* Types of 
** Filesystem based (VSS etc)
** Hardware based (VM etc)
** Storage subsystem copy service (FlashCopy, point in time volume copy)
The contents of Disk snapshot should be merged in here. Thoughts Baz whyte 19:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed section 

message: I removed this "Block-level snapshotting is almost always less space-efficient than direct file system support for snapshots."  This seems irrelevant, unsubstantiated and incomparable.  Please cite a valid reference if you re-add it.
Ian Macintosh (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume Managers 

message: WAFL needs clarification - It is listed under 'File Systems', and the sentence even reads "Some file systems, such as WAFL...", however in the footnotes, it is stated that WAFL is not a file system... What is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.7.40.225 (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WAFL 

message: Please see my comment to the Talk page for the Phantom OS []
Rhkramer (talk) 12:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phantom OS
Talk:Barnhill railway station

message: I wonder if a note should be added that this station should not be confused with the former Barnhill Railway Station (sometimes called (Barnhill, Angus), in Dundee on the Dundee and Forfar Direct Line or the short lived Barnhill terminus in Perth on the Dundee and Perth Railway? Dunarc (talk) 20:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The other Barnhill Railway Stations
Talk:De Havilland Engine Company

message: The intro states the company was set up to build the Gipsy in 1926, but the body states it was set up in 1944 to produce jets. Which is it? Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:09, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Originally it was the "Engine Division" of de Havilland but when DH bought out Frank Halford's design consultancy company in 1944 the Engine Division was re-organised and founded as a separate company becoming the "de Havilland Engine Company" under Halford. At the time Halford was working on the H.1 around-which the Vampire was designed and which later became the Goblin and as gas turbines were new it was felt that Halford would be better off with close contact with all things to do with this engine's manufacture. Halford and GDH had been good friends since WW I. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.29.18.180 (talk) 11:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory contents 
Talk:Keuper marl

message: I would my self, but I cant think of anything else to add.--06cat 12:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I've attempted to improve this article but the old & new geological nomenclature goes way beyond my comfort zone -- it might be improved by being refocused on the modern nomenclature, with a redirect. (However "Keuper marl" is still widely used in literature from, for example, Natural England.) I can't find any articles covering the new geological nomenclature, but I'm not sure where to look. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I intend making 'Keuper marl' a redirect page once I have added a little more material to the page at Mercia Mudstone Group - the term which has largely superseded 'Keuper' within the British geological succession. The term will be found in the literature for many years to come so it is important that those reading such material including maps can understand what it referred to and how the current subdivsions and nomenclature work. cheers Geopersona (talk) 17:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone enlarge this please 

message: It's long past the time that relevant content from this page (such as it may be) was transferred to Mercia Mudstone Group and this page converted to a redirect to that page. I'd do it but am unsure about dealing with page history etc.  Geopersona (talk) 05:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert page to a redirect
Talk:Mukundara Hills National Park

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Lenzie railway station

message: I have removed the line on the routing table referencing a route to Coatbridge Sunnyside. While this is a route that trains could have used, it was never a passenger route (even if it had been, there were four intermediate stations / halts between them). The link from the E&GR to the M&KR at Lenzie was only for mineral trains to and from Glasgow. The short-lived passenger services on the M&KR went to Woodley, which was walking distance from the then Kirkintilloch station.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamishmcsporran (talk • contribs) 00:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Routing Table
Talk:Edinburgh–Dunblane line

message: how easy is it to get to dunblane from edinburgh aiport?my elderly inlaws have a wedding in may and fly in from ireland?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.1.77 (talk) 22:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to get ro dunblane 

message: Request received to merge articles: Croy Line into Edinburgh to Dunblane Line; dated: December/2015. Proposer's Rationale: The article Croy Line does not have any sources for either the name Croy Line or any definition of the line. There is no reference to the phrase "Croy Line" that I can find anywhere outside Wikipedia or wiki mirror sites. 
The Dunblane and Alloa services from Edinburgh and Glasgow are run by Scotrail as an integrated operation and have no separate identity, stock, timetabling etc. All the evidence is that we should treat them as a single entity. 
I propose that Croy Line be merged into this article and then this article be renamed to reflect that change. 
Two name options are Central Scotland Line to match the reliable sources of Scotrail timetables and documents.
or Stirling, Alloa, Dunblane Line to match the reliable source of Transport Scotland 
I think the latter may be slightly better as it gives more geographic description in the title. Discuss here. Andrewdpcotton (talk) 10:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose on the grounds that there are sources that don't seem to be wiki mirrors that argue that this is the correct name, including official govenment maps. Also the "Central Scotland" timetable describes a region rather than a line. Klbrain (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion
Talk:Suzuki Cervo

message: Could we maybe archive some of this previously valid criticism? I feel that the article is quite decent by now, in spite of the ongoing (and often incorrect) flow of strictly UK market information. Maybe there should be a separate "Whizzkid" page for those who only worry about what happened to the 1st gen Cervo in the British market? Mr.choppers (talk) 07:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

message: maybe...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Somatosis (talk • contribs) 16:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst article in wikipedia? 

message: The website source referenced is IMHO unreliable, the surrounding quote on the article page even more so.
Post 1982 Lotus were part owned (circa 20%) by Toyota and were then later owned by GM, GM taking over from 1986 until 1993.
There appears to be nothing is nothing, anywhere in any published literature to support any intention by Lotus to produce these vehicles, which quite clearly require a completely different production facility to that used by Lotus throughout their entire history. 78.105.243.103 (talk) 14:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've ordered a book which should be able to tell me whether this is true or not. And you're right, the claims on that site don't hold too much water (as GM didn't even own Lotus until later).  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 20:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Manufacturing by Lotus
Talk:Whin Sill

message: I hear it commonly referred to as "Great Whin Sill" and indeed the article does this too. But the title omits it. Should it? Nomorenonotnever (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are, as the article now mentions, two Whin Sills; the Great ~' and the 'Little ~' though 'Whin Sill' is shorthand for either just the bigger of the two or else the combination. Geopersona (talk) 07:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name; Whin Sill or Great Whin Sill 

message: There is now a visitor centre, nay, , called The Sill. Its website is here. I haven't yet looked closely enough to confirm my vague feeling that this article could or perhaps even should mention it. What do you think? Best to all, DBaK (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps in the conventional section (as yet, absent from this article) "External links"? Feline Hymnic (talk) 21:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks . The thing that was slowing me from doing so straight off was that it was not instantly obvious to me from their lovely site that it is significantly enough about the Whin Sill, rather than it just being a nice/neat/clever name for a place there. If you think it's clear that there is a tight enough link for an EL please feel free! If not, I will get round to a proper look sooner or later, but probably not very quickly! Thanks and all good wishes DBaK (talk) 22:31, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sill visitor centre
Talk:Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Bathgate railway station (1986)

message: Why not Bathgate (E&BR) railway station? See discussion at Talk:Bathgate (New) railway station. --Stewart (talk | edits) 19:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see also the merger proposal I've made at Talk:Bathgate railway station.  --RFBailey (talk) 03:11, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name
Talk:Edinburgh–Bathgate line

message: Merge from Edinburgh and Bathgate Railway, which was created from a redirect to this article; it should go back to being a redirect to here, but there is a lot of non-overlapping content to resolve and merge first. Dicklyon (talk) 15:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Softline (South African software company)

message: To the user who initially created "Softline":this discussion has been happening on redirected "Softline Ukraine"
This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion. The given reason is: This item is unquestionably a copyright infringement of http://www.softline.kiev.ua/control/en/publish/article?art_id=48739&cat_id=20544, and no assertion of permission has been made. (CSD G12) 
...
(pls see rest of message under Softline Ukraine talk page)
Previous unsigned statement was made by User:Bherisson.
:Yes, and we all know to speak ukrainian. As far as I know, the company SoftLine has nothing to do with the Ukraine. You are talking about something different. Oh, please sign your name on talk pages, it's only polite. XcepticZP (talk) 21:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sofftlinr and Ukraine

message: Hello, I am inserting this as I have made major changes to the page. The key figure section of this article is riddled with ad-like content that is nearly impossible to remove. Additionally, this is not consistent with any other wikipedia page for a company. It not only makes the article biased but is possibly dangerous as it lists out several employees. This would also be difficult to update. I have moved information about the founders, CEO, and other major individuals into the history section. Anything else is both unnecessary and promotional. CherriGasoline (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Key Figures
Talk:Butetown branch line

message: I have deleted the reference to through running from Aberdare, Treherbert and Merthyr Tydfil because the source that is cited simply does not support the assertion. If there is alternative authority for this suggestion, it should be cited.
Whilst it would be convenient for there to be some through trains, the proposal would present two disadvantages: (1) surely some peak hour trains running between Rhondda Cynon Taf and Cardiff are generally longer than those currently running on the Butetown Branch Line. Would the proposed new stations at Cardiff Bay and Loudoun Square accommodate them? (2) Assuming the services from the valleys are doubled to 4 tph from each RCT terminus, 6 tph would still mean that half the trains did not offer a through service to Cardiff Central and its mainline connections. This would surely inconvenience more travellers than it would advantage.Ntmr (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resumption of through running
Talk:Cardiff Bay railway station

message: I propose to merge Cardiff Bay (The Flourish) railway station into Cardiff Bay railway station. Notifying editors 
===Discussion===
Nominate for merger – I think that the content in the former The Flourish article can easily be explained in an 'extension' section in this article.
* It is nearly a duplicate of this page - The name of both stations is now identical, and the article already states that when the one station closes, the other will open, and as a result there will not be two Cardiff Bay station entities.
* There is much overlap as both stations are related - Better to merge it now rather than in a few years time, as this enables a single wiki article on the future state of Cardiff Bay railway station. Also avoids confusion of having two near identical stations with separate articles. 
* The Flourish article is rather short on detail and there is insufficient information about the new station to justify it having an independent article Llemiles (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 06:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Nominate for merger – I think that the content in the former The Flourish article can easily be explained in an 'extension' section in this article.
* It is nearly a duplicate of this page - The name of both stations is now identical, and the article already states that when the one station closes, the other will open, and as a result there will not be two Cardiff Bay station entities.
* There is much overlap as both stations are related - Better to merge it now rather than in a few years time, as this enables a single wiki article on the future state of Cardiff Bay railway station. Also avoids confusion of having two near identical stations with separate articles. 
* The Flourish article is rather short on detail and there is insufficient information about the new station to justify it having an independent article Llemiles (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 06:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Eastern journey of Nicholas II

message: Why is it said that this was a round-the-world trip when, based on the description, he didn't cross the int'l date line or come through the Americans and western Europe? Maybe circumfrentially it was around the world, but that doesn't fit into the average person's definition of "around the world". Mcnattyp (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: At least a pair of panegyrical exaggerations in this sentence:
As this was <SPAN style=background:gold>the first</SPAN> dubious</SPAN> visit by such an <SPAN style=background:gold>important foreign prince</SPAN>unbalanced opinion</SPAN> to Japan…It's not self-evident that Imperial Russia was of primary importance to Japan by 1890. And I'm not sure that Nicky was the first foreign prince to visit Japan since Matthew C. Perry forced Japan to end the policy of self-isolation in 1854. Anyway, since Meiji Restoration in 1868, which finally opened Japan the doors into the world diplomacy, lots of princes may have dropped their unofficial visits there. A scent of pro-emperor’s bias may be noted in the other parts of the article… well, I hope an accident in Japan when a policeman stroke Nickolas (for what?) should be mentioned here to provide a balanced point of view upon the subject. Cherurbino (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Exaggerations

message: The article mentions that over 200 photos from the journey were taken by Vladimir Medeleyev. My question is if and where they can be seen? Are the photos printed in any of the mentioned books, and / or are there original photographic prints available in museum collections?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eboro (talk • contribs) 11:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos from Eastern journey of Nicholas II 
Talk:Shared memory (interprocess communication)

message: this page needs to have a section of what shared memory means in software
ie. a type of ipc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.202.243.193 (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 1

message: It makes no sense to ask for clarification on "world-writable". In the scope of this article it should be assumed that a reader has knowledge of unix permission handling.
The permissions on /dev/shm are only relevant as it is a security risk and different from classic shared memory segments which will normally have a owning process (and user).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.135.62.109 (talk) 15:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 2
Talk:Kartabo, Guyana

message: Precisely what should I add to this to make it not a stub?  There's just not that much information available...
:Try:
:*Add  at the top and fill in at least name, locator map = Guyana and coordinates
:*Add some inline references to show where the information can be found; see Wikipedia:Cite
:*Is there any history known about the place? If so add it under a new heading
:*Add  near the bottom and add Kartabo to it if not already there
:*Take a look at some other settlements in Guyana to see the kind of information and structure that is expected.
:Good luck. -Arb. (talk) 16:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Courser (horse)

message: Corrected the mispelled "corseiro". The corrected Italian word is "corsiero" (or "corsiere", same meaning). 
"Corseiro" is the Portuguese word for "Corsair". 
Massimolai80 13:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks! Gwinva 13:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

text: There is some difference, see Horses in the Middle Ages for issues.  Montanabw(talk) 17:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sweet F.A. (album)

message: Removed bit about the "Fender audiocaster" guitar that was mentioned as being n the cover.  The cover art shown here does not have a guitar, and while Fender famously makes the Stratocaster and Telecaster, I could find no reference to an "audiocaster".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.251.172 (talk) 23:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Swept Away (Diana Ross album)

message: Meanwhile after Diana Ross does the song with different lyrics. I found it on Eurobeat YT that says that Touch by Touch was sanged by Austrian band Joy. I proved the Ross one was writed by Andreas Schweitzer and Alfred Jaklitsch and it placed #1 by Austrian charts, so this single was popular in Philippines rather than Diana Ross. so it mentioned Joy's debut album Hello then it remixed in 2010 as Touch by Touch 2011. So I found that Joy's version of TBT was spanned in Philippines, Austria, Russia, Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, South Korea, Latvia and Germany. We know the Joy version was very popular. 99.109.85.105 (talk) 01:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about Touch by Touch?
Talk:Would I Lie To You?

message: I changed the redirect on the article to point to Would I Lie to You?, as the Eurythmics song seems to be the primary use. -GTBacchus(talk) 15:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No complaints.  Thanks for your work on this.--badlydrawnjeff talk 18:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Symmetric in Design

message: It's a general consensus that Scar Symmetry is melodic death metal. 
Also, the source used for the album being a death metal album is invalid for use of genres. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Sources says that "AllMusic's genre sidebar should be avoided. " Therefore, death metal should not be added based off of AllMusic. 
If you have a better source of this album being death metal, suggest it here. TheEarthboundFan2001 (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's melodic death metal, not death metal.
Talk:Member of the Legislative Assembly

message: Shouldn't this be turned into a disambiguation page?
—Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 13:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: cook some chicken nugget while contacting them  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.216.179.170 (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  mla 

message: This is also epic na history always follow up in your life. Like this is happened like yesterday. Bittu218 (talk) 18:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Ilsley (ship)

message: Was this vessel a privateer?
Cheers!  Geo Swan 00:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: So...

message: Two of the article's three sentences appear to have been written by a young child. No sources are cited, and the article's tone is far from neutral, to say the least. Mdnavman (talk) 17:49, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some vandalism had snuck in unnoticed a couple of months ago. It's usually worth checking through the edit history to see if that's the case. Benea (talk) 02:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs much clean-up
Talk:Ta det lugnt

message: Could someone more knowledgeable than me about Dungen explain the following. I was always curious about the title being "Du E för Fin för Mig" and the "E" in the chorus being pronounced "Ahh", but I put this down to me not knowing anything about Swedish pronunciation. But, then, the other day, I opened up the sleeve, and it's written "Du Är för Fin för Mig"... so, the real title is? Demonofthefall 14:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title of track 4...? 
Talk:Take It (album)

message: This article is currently nominated for AfD deletion.  
The AfD page seems to redirect to the band's AfD-nominated page, and not to the song's AfD page.  In any case, as to the AfD question, I would:
*Delete -- no notability demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 23:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD
Talk:Tales Don't Tell Themselves

message: Sorry, but "According to Matt..." seems like an appallingly bad way of starting a sentence in an encyclopaedic entry. Throughout the article "Matt" and other people are referred by their first names. Was this entry written by their parents, by any chance?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.86.179.58 (talk) 15:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Informal Tone
Talk:USS Congress (1799)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: This Congress is apparently the ship that no one cared enough to write about. You will see the amount of books in the bibliography and believe me when I say there isn't much out there about this ship. I've exhausted all references available to me and as you can see there are still some large gaps in her service career. At least I was able to almost double the article size from where it was previously. --Brad (talk) 00:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference not needed. name=Long> --Pawyilee (talk) 01:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: A note about this article