lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Paudie Coffey

message: Mr Coffey alleged he was defamed by the Kilkenny People newspaper on the 15th of January 2016. He was nicknamed Coffey the Robber after he allegedly tried to take parts of Kilkenny and move it to Waterford. The comparison was based on William Crotty who was an 18th century criminal known as Crotty the Robber. Mr Coffey settled out of court on the 31st of July 2019, the details are unknown at present.
* www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/high-court/fine-gael-td-was-surprised-by-coffey-the-robber-headline-on-article-1.3716230%3fmode=amp
This should be added to his page along with references & additional information like when he decided to take the action. (78.17.89.207 (talk) 17:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Settlement
Talk:Lucinda Creighton

message: Creighton's former profile/biography page at the Fine Gael party's website (now redirected to the website home page) is archived at webcitation.org to prevent loss of information and to provide a potentially useful reference in case the page is removed. — O'Dea (talk) 14:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creighton's Fine Gael profile/biography paged archived 

message: This statement is incorrect. Creighton is still a member of Fine Gael - but she is just not within the parliamentary party at the moment. Quite a big difference. 109.78.69.56 (talk) 20:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "Just not within the parliamentary party" means she is an independent TD. Snappy (talk) 21:20, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Former Fine Gael Member' 

message: Is there a reference from a good authority that says Ms Creighton is not ther leader of Renua? Is there a reference stating that there is a new leader? Is so, cite them. Laurel Lodged (talk) 09:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leader 
Talk:Section 44 of the Constitution of Australia

message: It's not a bad start to this article, but I'm a bit bemused as to how one can write an article about S44 without mentioning Sykes v Cleary, the case which spawned most of the modern caselaw about it. Rebecca (talk) 10:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Sec 44 mentions allegiance to "foreign power" separate from its mention of citizen or country. A "foreign power" could include organisations or private individuals who possess more power and/or money than countries.
Moreover, a foreign power or foreign country could have a religious power. A country may automatically permit citizenship for those who follow a particular religion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.129.109.169 (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign Power 

message: I’m not sure if it’s better to have no images in this article or add them for everyone possible. At the moment, there is a single picture of Scott Ludlam, which makes it look like it’s all about him when shared on social media. —☸ Moilleadóir ☎ 02:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you about the need for balance. In 2016 I would have agreed that we should include photos for everyone.  From 2017, it is probably overkill all 17, or even the 10 found to be ineligible or 5 who resigned from the House of reps.  Any suggestions on how to choose a representative sample ? Find bruce (talk) 03:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single picture is a little unbalanced
Talk:Patrick D'Arcy

message: I've edited down the following, as the reference to a pre-Celtic people is unsourced and looks like some highly speculative wishful thinking to explain away more modest origins:
"Ó Dorchaidhe was said to be a member of a lowly family descended from the Partraige Cera of Lough Carra, in what is now County Mayo. The Partraige are not featured in any Irish annal or chronicle, and may have been a remnant of a Pre-Celtic people. The only record of them in Gaelic sources is a brief note stating that the Uí Dorchaidhe was chieftain of the Partraige, while their king was the Ó Goirmiallaigh."
Smd49 (talk) 21:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre-Celtic origins

message: The Argument section reads: During a conference held in the dining-room of Dublin Castle on 9 June 1641, Darcy delivered his famous Argument. Published in 1643 and reprinted in 1764, it was the first forceful and detailed statement of the rule of law in Ireland, articulating an effective constitutional position for her as England's colonial country. He is quoted arguing to William Molyneux that "no parliament but an Irish one can properly legislate for Ireland", which is the central summation of his work.
Molyneaux wasn't alive in 1641, so it must have been someone else. Any ideas?.78.17.5.126 (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. Maybe the intended meaning was that Darcy's thesis anticipated Molyneux's? Q·L·1968 ☿ 00:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Molyneaux?
Talk:Terence Flanagan

message: Since Flanagan was expelled from the Fine Gael party on 2 July 2013, his profile/biography page at the party's website is likely to be purged. It has been archived at webcitation.org to prevent loss of information and to provide a potentially useful reference. — O'Dea (talk) 05:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flanagan's Fine Gael profile/biography paged archived
Talk:Syed Kasran

message: Syed Kasran  Tehsil Gujarkhan is not a town but a small village located on the Mandra-Chakwal road. Besides a village it is also a bus stop and a common station for the villages Panjgran Kalan and Bahawaley Khurd. 87.213.65.248 (talk) 09:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Nature (disambiguation)

message: See the Nature talk page for discussion. Tevildo (talk) 11:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The result merge was so dense that it was difficult to use.  I redid it as separate disambig pages, while still attempting to following  WP:DAB guidelines. 67.100.45.149 (talk) 18:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Dominic Hannigan

message: "..for which neither the bank nor the Irish state had no legal liability." Surely this wording was not intended? If the sense given here was intentional, surely there is a better way of putting it, such as "for which either.. had some liability" or even "for which both.. had some liability"? Harfarhs (talk) 09:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double negative 
Talk:Fidelma Healy Eames

message: Healy Eames' profile page at the Fine Gael party's website is archived at webcitation.org to prevent loss of information and to provide a potentially useful reference in case the page is removed. Snappy (talk) 20:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Healy Eames' Fine Gael profile paged archived 
Talk:ASM-135 ASAT

message: A United States Army Nike Zeus missile armed with a nuclear warhead destroyed an orbiting satellite in May 1963.  This does not look right.  Sources talk about successful intercept (i.e. passing sufficiently close that a nuclear warhead would have destroyed the satellite), not actual destruction of satellite. See for example . JustSomePics (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely – since that source isn't entirely clear ("modified", "intercepted") I've adjusted the wording accordingly. --Zac67 (talk) 07:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development
Talk:Constance Jeans

message: Olympic athletes are notable. Olympic medal winners, doubly so. This woman won two silver medals. There is no way this article should be deleted. (Note:I didn't place the "holdon" tag, I'm just throwing in my two cents.) faithless (speak) 11:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion 
Talk:Michael Fahy

message: The Irish Election Literature Blog post from 2011 (reference 9 at this time) states that Fahy was a candidate for Independent Fianna Fáil. This is backed up by Kenny and Keane, Irish Politics Now (1987) which states in addition (p. 168) that "Neil Blaney turned up for the launching of his campaign"—although the authors, not for the only time in the book, mis-spell the candidate's name. I suggest that this might be enough to go against the Elections Ireland designation of Fahy at that time as "Independent". Harfarhs (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electoral affiliation, 1987
Talk:Ulster Reform Club

message: * Any common sense will tell one that in the late C19th and early C20th Belfast was a "great industrial power"! That is not a PoV statement. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 12:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's nonsense to suggest that the Reform Club is not notable.  The Larne Gun running was done from it.Traditional unionist (talk) 13:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't know that.  I'm sure there's a history of it published, I'll ask around. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 14:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lets have some references that goes into detail about its notability.--Vintagekits (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lets limit the demands. It'll be done.Traditional unionist (talk) 20:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Some material here for you. Rockpocket 23:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed this book from the article, but it looks like it might be able to be used as a reference if somebody would be able to attain it. 
JF Harbinson, A history of the Ulster Unionist Party, Belfast, 1973
:ThemFromSpace 19:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Francis M. Dimond

message: I'm a little confused who was his Lieutenant Governor. Going by the List of lieutenant governors of Rhode Island, he would seem to have been his own Lieutenant Governor. Assuming that the office was vacant once Dimond became Governor, the years on the List of lieutenant governors of Rhode Island would need to be fixed. - Kzirkel (talk) 16:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lieutenant Governor
Talk:Eoin Ó Broin

message: The article states that he is a member of the Sinn Féin's governing body what is this? BigDuncTalk 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A former member of the Ard Chomhairle  so I'll update that. Valenciano (talk) 20:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought that was what was meant but checked first thanks for swift reply. BigDuncTalk 20:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Governing Body 

message: Should we refer to the fact that Eion Ó Brion was educated at a private school? Jdaly81 (talk) 01:48, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC: Eoin Ó Brion
Talk:Marco Coltellini

message: There is virtually no citations. I believe someone must be inserting a disclaimer at the beginning regarding this. LostCitrationHunter (talk) 10:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Citations
Talk:Elisha Dyer

message: As of today, the Elisha Dyer articles have them misnumbered. This article should be on "Elisha Dyer II" (notice his father is also Elisha Dyer). See "The Leaders of Rhode Island's Golden Age", Patrich Conley, 2019, p. 90 for an example of Governor Dyer referred to as "Elisha Dyer II" and his son (also a governor) as "Elisha Dyer III". See also "Representative Men and Old Families of Rhode Island", 1908, p. 2, where he is called "Elisha Dyer (2)". See also the Brown University catalog for 1879, where his son is referred to as "Elisha Dyer III".
At the very least, the Dyer articles should be moved to names that are not numbered, because the present article names are confusing, and the Dyers don't seem to have been usually referred to as "II" or "III" or "IV" in their time. Brianyoumans (talk) 20:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I seem to have partially confused myself. The reference above to the Brown catalog is in fact to Elisha Dyer III, grandson of this Elisha Dyer. So, some evidence that in his lifetime he was known as Elisha Dyer III. However, by the time of the 1908 book linked above, genealogists were already numbering the Dyers starting with the governor's father, so that Elisha Dyer III was Elisha Dyer (4), and by the time of 2019 work his father was being called Elisha Dyer III. So, it's confusing. But I stick by my recommendation - the Dyers should not be referred to by number, since various sources number them differently.Brianyoumans (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbering the Dyers

message: I think going by the list at List of governors of Rhode Island is appropriate, and that numbers him as #25.
You could, I suppose, ignore the governors who served more than one term discontinuously, but that would give you a much different number. Brianyoumans (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: What's His Number?
Talk:British National Time Trial Championships

message: This event is actually organised by British Cycling, the CTT also hold a series of national time trial championships but these are not generally referred to as the British National Time Trial Championships, but rather as the CTT National Championships if I recall correctly. There are several CTT championships, one for each standard TT distance, eg. 10, 25, 50 & 100 miles, 12 & 24 hours. Thaf (talk) 13:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: BC vs. CTT
Talk:Baldwin DRS-6-4-1500

message: See Preston Cook's excellent article "WHEN EMD, ALCO & BALDWIN MET IN MORROCCO" (pp22-35) in the March 2011 issue of Railroads Illustrated. Cook has photos of the end cab DRS6-4-1500 unit in service in Morocco. --SSW9389 11:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service in Morocco
Talk:Loose leaf

message: I was reading the article on the King_James_Bible. It quotes that it was published looseleaf for 10 shillings, or bound for 12. Obviously the looseleaf version was bought by book binders to create more elaborate bindings. but it puts the history part of this article in an odd light.
Dcutter (talk) 19:45, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: history possibly false

message: Tea doesn't come in just tea-bags, it can also be just leaves. Perhaps we outght to have a link to tea, or a re-direct option/disambiguation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.248.246.131 (talk) 20:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Loose leaf tea

message: The article states:
"In 1921, President Herbert Hoover established 8 by 10.5 inches as the standard size in the United States"
Making a standard sounds like something Hoover would have done, being an engineer and all. Unfortunately, his term as president was from 1929 to 1933. For 1921, Wilson was president until March, succeeded by Harding. If the standard was made in 1921, it was one of those men. If in 1931 (???), it was Hoover.
::OR:
In 1921, Hoover WAS Secretary of Commerce (for Harding/Coolidge); could he have done it then?  68.228.82.130 (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoover wasn't president in 1921

message: "Loose leaf" probably is best and most widely understood as a descriptive term that would come under both an entry on Paper and one on Book.  The original entry seems to actually be about "binder paper" which the original author refers to as "loose leaf".  In fact much of this entry sounds like catalog and product recommendations for binder paper.  It has been edited to attempt to clarify the origin of the term loose leaf and disambiguate, but "loose leaf" really describes a form that paper or books are available in (as opposed to rolled, scrolled, or bound).  Julaville (talk) 17:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book or Paper descriptive term
Talk:Glen Waverley line

message: The year open in the info box is 1950, yet the stations opened in 1930, or to Darling by 1895. Perhaps they didn't run trains? --Michael Johnson 06:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year open 

message: Hi all, I noticed that there is no line guide under the line guide section. Could someone please add one? Thanks LivingInTwilight (talk) 05:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line guide 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (The only objections were about Sunbury line. Those have been resolved with the RM at Talk:Sunbury Line (Norfolk Southern).) (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 14:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @NotOrrio forgot to mention this but could we also include V/Line services in this? e.g. commuter services (like Geelong or Aarat) and intercity/long distance (Warrnambool, Maryborough). HoHo3143 (talk) 03:20, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would do those in a separate RM, because many people have already commented here without considering those articles, and those articles are under different circumstances which merit their own conversations. Steelkamp (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Steelkamp yeah that's a good point. Maybe we can do it once this has finished and been completed. HoHo3143 (talk) 04:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per WP:COMMONNAME. Alamein line already follows this principle. 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 14:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Side note: that’s because only a few weeks ago, it was called Alamein railway line. This request is for the rest of Melbourne’s lines I believe. Fork99 (talk) 14:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 August 2023
Talk:Ryan Aeronautical

message: ** How does it get founded in 1934 when the Sprit of St. Louis flew in the late 20's?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.1.114 (talk) 08:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Founding
Talk:Priceless (2006 film)

message: Should this article be renamed to Priceless (film), since Hors de prix is the French title? Jeff-themovie (talk) 13:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: English title

message: The shot with the wrong ear apparently bandaged is definitely through a mirror.  If it wasn't, the watch would be on his right hand.  GIrving (talk) 07:35, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shot with wrong ear bandaged

message: There is another movie called Priceless (IMDB) released in 2012. -- 193.40.6.84 (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priceless (2012) 

message: I removed the "Not to be confused with Priceless (2016 film)" hatlink because it contravenes Wikipedia policy at WP:NAMB, which gives as a case of an improper hatlink being a hatlink which is "disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous". "Priceless (2006 film)" is not ambiguous because the year is already specified in the article title. Additionally, there is already a main disambiguation page at Priceless which lists other films by the same title. Furthermore, using the hatlink for films that are disambiguated by year is contrary to general Wikipedia practice. Examples:
* Moonlight (2002 film), Moonlight (2016 film)
* Nine Lives (1957 film), Nine Lives (2002 film), Nine Lives (2005 film), Nine Lives (2016 film)
* Passengers (2008 film), Passengers (2016 film)
* Titanic (1915 film), Titanic (1943 film), Titanic (1953 film), Titanic (1997 film)
Finally, it is inconsistent to have a hatlink here at Priceless (2006 film) but no equivalent hatlink at Priceless (2016 film), which highlights the problem with hatlinking films disambiguated by year: it would mean including long hatlinks with links cover all other films of the same title in all other years at the beginning of every such film article.
—Lowellian (reply) 15:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: And I put the hatlink back. Not because I disagree with all of the "2006 vs 2016" stuff you mentioned (although, I have no interest in comparing it to other pages which could just as easily be edited or contain their own errors), but because there isn't a dab page listed. Feel free to put a "for other uses of Priceless, click here" if you don't like the current "not to be confused with" that is there. Kellymoat (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Hatlink
Template talk:Queensland Government

message: I am wondering why a link to the High Court of Australia is included in this template, and in most (but not all) of its interstate equivalent templates.  The High Court is not a state court.  It is a Federal Supreme Court established under the federal constitution, and is funded and administered solely by the federal government.  It is true that it is possible to appeal from the Supreme Court to the High Court, but it is also possible, in more limited circumstances, to appeal from a state court to the Federal Court or the Family Court.  I would therefore suggest that the link to the High Court be removed from this template. Bahnfrend (talk) 16:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Court
Template talk:Government of the Northern Territory

message: I am wondering why a link to the High Court of Australia is included in this template, and in most (but not all) of its equivalent templates relating to the various states and the ACT.  The High Court is not a territory court.  It is a Federal Supreme Court established under the federal constitution, and is funded and administered solely by the federal government.  It is true that it is possible to appeal from the Supreme Court to the High Court, but it is also possible, in more limited circumstances, to appeal from a territory court to the Federal Court.  I would therefore suggest that the link to the High Court be removed from this template. Bahnfrend (talk) 16:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Court
Template talk:Government of New South Wales

message: I've moved the Leader of the Opposition and the Shadow Portfolios to "legislative", as they're not part of the executive government, they're traditional positions within the legislature.  If anyone feels I'm wrong please explain why here after reverting. - DustFormsWords (talk) 22:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Executive/Legislative

message: I am wondering why a link to the High Court of Australia is included in this template, and in most (but not all) of its interstate equivalent templates.  The High Court is not a state court.  It is a Federal Supreme Court established under the federal constitution, and is funded and administered solely by the federal government.  It is true that it is possible to appeal from the Supreme Court to the High Court, but it is also possible, in more limited circumstances, to appeal from a state court to the Federal Court or the Family Court.  I would therefore suggest that the link to the High Court be removed from this template. Bahnfrend (talk) 16:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Court
Talk:Business school ranking

message: I find this subject important, and thus that the article would stay, since it is a subject reappearing in many business school articles. See the business schools in list for examples. Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, found the main article, so redirected to there. Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of Irish local government areas 1899–1921

message: The title for this article needs correcting.  The reformed system of local government for Ireland came into force in 1899 and not in 1898.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:EC13:9700:F1CF:310D:863D:66A (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Bicing

message: I rated this article start-class; it is nice to read, visually attractive, but needs some more sources or references to go to C.--EdgeNavidad (talk) 15:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:Creusot steam hammer

message: The following sentence discusses energy not force, and should probably be edited to replace the world "force" with "energy", and the metric conversion to read 4.5 MJ (megajoules).  The foot note should also be revised to reflect this change.
Original:  "The actual force delivered may have been in the order of 3.3 million foot-pounds (or 500,000 kilogram-metres)."
Revised: "The actual energy delivered may have been on the order of 3.3 million foot-pounds (or 4.5 MJ)."
This assumes of course that the anvil actually weighed 100 short tons.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.44.25.219 (talk) 21:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 