Talk:Metro Rapid

message: There really isn't a good case for fair use with this image, as it should be easy for someone to provide an alternative photo under a free licence.  JeremyA 04:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Im all for using someones photo, but this is a good stand in plus it matches the kind of picture on the Metro Local page, as its from the same press photo section. RickyCourtney 17:17, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What photo?  Someone got an image of the Metro Local and uploaded it; the press image was subsequently deleted. Hbdragon88 21:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:LACMTA Rapid Bus.jpg]] 

message: I managed to get a picture of another Metro Rapid Bus as I was driving around LA, dunno if you guys want this image to replace the previous one i took. Jorobeq 09:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Picture

message: This line is not operated by WSC-7.  It is operated by either a San Gabriel Valley sector division or Division 2 or 10.  If I find out I'll post it.  But just because a line falls under a sector does not mean that the service comes from that sector's divisions.  Especially since some sectors (i.e. Gateway Cities) do not have a division in their service boundaries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.9.33.203 (talk) 22:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Route 728

message: I have taken another photo of the Metro Rapid bus...  :Image:Long Los Angeles Metro Rapid Bus 2008-04-17.jpg --AllyUnion (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another photo 

message: When reading this article I noticed that there is no ridership information - how many commuters actually use this service on a daily basis? Coupled with the extensive Criticism section the article as a whole appears negatively biased. AadaamS (talk) 12:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Ridership Information & Negative Bias 

message: ...and I believe much of it is inaccurate. The fact that few or no sources are mentioned is a red flag for sure.
Also, this article includes far too much inconsequential detail that would not be of interest to the average Wikipedia user just seeking to learn about the Metro Rapid service. Take this quote for example: "A year after Metro introduced SmartBus technology on most of their buses, marquees were modified on most Metro Rapid buses in which the 'STOP REQUESTED' portion scrolls across the marquee instead of staying in place and 'PLEASE USE REAR EXIT' scrolls slowly. Months later, marquees were switched back to their original format." C'mon, seriously? That type of information may be of interest to a transit fan, but is not of general interest (plus, the "original format" is never even mentioned). --AlikaAlex 18:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Waaaaay too much detail in this article...

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Metro Rapid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120619161136/http://www.bigbluebus.com:80/busroutes/schedule.asp?bus_route=33&dayofweek=weekdays to http://www.bigbluebus.com/busroutes/schedule.asp?bus_route=33&dayofweek=weekdays
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120424194328/http://www.culvercity.org:80/Government/Transportation/Bus/~/media/Files/Bus/BusStops/Rapid_Line6_Effective_01042010.ashx to http://www.culvercity.org/Government/Transportation/Bus/~/media/Files/Bus/BusStops/Rapid_Line6_Effective_01042010.ashx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120528144914/http://www.bigbluebus.com:80/busroutes/location/index.asp?routeid=77 to http://www.bigbluebus.com/busroutes/location/index.asp?routeid=77
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified