Talk:Little Brother (group)

message: :Image:Chittlin2.jpg, :Image:Chittlin1.jpg, :Image:Commercial1.jpg, :Image:Justusforall.jpg, :Image:Little Brother - The Minstrel Show.jpg, :Image:Listening1.jpg, :Image:Separate.jpg, :Image:Minstrel1.jpg, and :Image:68mquxc.jpg are being used on this article. I notice the image page for each specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to each image description page, as linked above, and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationales for images

message: Someone should cite the statement that 9th wonder produced for Hieroglyphics for I cannot find a single track that he has ever collaborated with them on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.109.110 (talk) 06:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  9th wonder 

message: I believe that Little Brother should be a disambiguation page, and the current contents moved to Little Brother (Hip Hop group). The success of Cory Doctorow's book Little Brother leads me to believe that there is no reason why the musical outfit is notable enough to be the primary definition page for Little Brother. Any objections?  kevyn (talk) 04:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - I never heard of the band and I came to this page fully expecting details about Doctorow's book - a disambiguation page is the least we could do. -- Marcika (talk) 02:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Makes sense to me. Carl.bunderson (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I also concur (with the general idea; we probably would not use a disambiguation that long and if we did we wouldn't capitalize the music genre). I'll do the disambiguating myself.  After almost one full year there has been no objection. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs.    11:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page 

message: I think the template should be added to Phonte and Big Pooh's pages, as well as any other member pages.Metalb (talk) 08:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Bring that up on the talk page of the articles in question. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs.    11:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justus League template 

message: *Apologies - noticed this new album page is already in the works, and under review. I made a mistake of creating a draft without knowing...will have it deleted and work from the prior version at Draft:May The Lord Watch
Wondering if anyone was taking up an effort to make a new page with the May the Lord Watch album and link it to the LB Main page?
Any opinions on if it meets notability guidelines for an album?
I would think so due to: 'reunion album', some degree of critical acclaim and it could enhance the main LB page's to be more current. 
Newcomer, but willing to chip-in and work on it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdidasZRO (talk • contribs) 17:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  May the Lord Watch Album - New Page?**UPDATED**