Talk:X̱wáýx̱way

message: I remember in the aftermath of the storm, the Globe and Mail, or the Vancouver Sun, published a feature story on the history of Stanley Park.  It went into detail about the eviction of August Jack and other event around the theft of the area.  It's interesting to note that the Stanley Park page mentions little about the 99 year lease from the Crown, when Crown land is usually automatically up for land claims, especially when the Park is unceded territory.  I have this striking feeling the media will be following this soon.  If or when it comes out and a media scrum happens between the Squamish Nation, the Parks Board, and the City of Vancouver, this article will probably be a good one to work on since it will be a strong indicator of existance in Stanley Park.  Mention of the remains excavated in he late 1890's, the eviction of the people, the villages, the other stories around this village.  I'll pull out my "Stanley Park Secrets" and start citing sources right away.  Any help would be appreciated!  OldManRivers (talk) 03:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation and Collaboartion 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Xoloz (talk) 18:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I may refer you to again to WP:DIACRITICS. I have to be honest I don't care for your tone. I may equally refer you to Wikipedia:Etiquette.--Labattblueboy (talk) 03:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My "tone"?  Try some AGF instead of oversensitive accusations; I'm saying that you are comparing apples with apples.  If diacritics were a hard and fast guideline in the way you are claiming, the first Squamish RM would never have gone the way it did.  And you are wikilawyering by narrow intrepretations of only one guideline.  The full context here has to be considered. And yes, what you are saying makes no sense, that's an observation, not a personal attack.Skookum1 (talk) 03:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You accused me of wikilawyering and then tell me to that I need to assume good faith. Maybe have a look at Wikipedia:Don't call the kettle black. I think I've made the arguments I need to here. I remain opposed.--Labattblueboy (talk) 04:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: OH, I know all about "pot kettle black I get enough of that thrown at me.  I observed that you were in violation of two of the wikilawyering points; that's an observation, not an accusation.Skookum1 (talk) 04:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
*Skookum1, I may be out of my depth here.  Generally, I like your position.  If your proposed target is no less "accurate" than the current, then maybe I !voted wrong.  If the accurate name is not able to be rendered in the title, then I don't know what is best, something close, or give up and go ASCII?  In your nomination, I found myself unpersuaded that there was a problem with the current title.  In terms of tomfools, my wish is that non-authors of the article should not be allowed to drive renames of the article.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

text: Both redirects have been tagged with the R from title without diacritics template. That should do the trick.--Labattblueboy (talk) 22:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We'll see, I guess.  Time will tell.Skookum1 (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: This and Xwemelcht'sn need to be salted so they can't be subjected to "correction" by people who IDONTLIKEIT like was done with Sta7mes?Skookum1 (talk) 18:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Both redirects have been tagged with the R from title without diacritics template. That should do the trick.--Labattblueboy (talk) 22:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We'll see, I guess.  Time will tell.Skookum1 (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Would someone please SALT this title?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on X̱wáýx̱way. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100729025940/http://www.canada.com:80/vancouversun/news/westcoastnews/story.html?id=4286a015-9cbf-43ae-827f-00c5c5eae3f0&k=34270&p=1%29 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/westcoastnews/story.html?id=4286a015-9cbf-43ae-827f-00c5c5eae3f0&k=34270&p=1)
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified