Talk:Aaron Teitelbaum

message: To the several people who keep changing and reverting the article- stop, please. Otherwise I'll get an admin to lock the page until you behave. ShalomShlomo 09:26, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning

message: I've removed the state/religion comment, and modified the paragraph to what I think is fair. If you have a problem with it, please mention it here first before changing it again, or get in touch with me on my talk page. ShalomShlomo 02:16, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: State/religion comment

message: To 67.139.62.77- you're making the page too POV. Please stop. If you want to add or change something, cite a source for it. Otherwise, I'll have to keep reverting it and get an admin to lock it. ShalomShlomo 02:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Warning

message: Who claims that Rabbi Aaron is trying to sever Satmar's ties with the haredi world?  That is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.127.40.3 (talk • contribs) 
:It was tossed in by some Zalman-supporter during an edit war. I included it insofar as it seemed representative of some of the criticisms of Aaron from Zalman's people. I guess the issue is both is it true (which doesn't seem to the case) as well as "is this what some people accuse him of?". As someone not in touch with either community, I'm not really in a position to evaluate this. The intent of including it wasn't to slander Aaron, but to try and give some representation to his critics. Some input on how to present this in a balanced way would be appreciated. Maybe it should be deleted and replaced with a short section summing up some of the criticism he's encountered from pro-Zalman people? ShalomShlomo 07:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims

message: Hi 204.52.215.107- can you provide a source for the Aaron's followers declaring him rebbe stuff? I did a quick google search and couldn't find anything. ShalomShlomo 19:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This was rumor posted by someone else that I happened to pick up while on Wikipedia. You were right to change it. 204.52.215.107 23:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Source: MAZEL TOV! Before the Lavaya from Rabeiny Hck' Zy"u the Rushei HaKahila from Wm"s,BP,KY. Took his oldest Son C"K Muran (Gavad KY) Shlita to take over to be ADMO"R M'SATMAR! & Hrh"g R' Hertzka Tzvibel Shlita Rosh HaKolel D'Satmar was reading the 'TZAVUAH'. DTC. Yachi Adoneiny Moreiny V'Rabeiny Tzadick Doreiny!!! April 25 7:44 am http://www.upoc.com/group.jsp?group=ANASHDSATMAR Bobover1 00:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession & Will Stuff

message: I’ve added the position of Aaron’s followers, and frankly the view accepted by virtually anyone other than his enemies, on his commitment to anti-Zionism. If this had been edited before and, for whatever reason, deleted, I apologize. Also, the assertion that Aaron has been “condemned … as "semi-heretical" is absurd and is expressing the view of an individual not notable enough. Unless this could be verified, I think it ought to be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.139.62.77 (talk • contribs) 
:Thanks for the extra info. I've deleted the semi-heretical remark. Just for the record, if you'd be willing to get a username and start signing your posts with four tildes (~), it makes keeping track of who's saying what on these pages a lot easier. ShalomShlomo 06:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'll follow your advice.--67.139.62.77 15:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bakcground Information Edit

message: This article should be moved to Aharon Teitelbaum. Any opponents? --Daniel575 22:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's particularly necessary, but as long as you change the referring links, I think it's fine.ShalomShlomo 05:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Daniel575, this is ridiculous. How is the information inaccurate? And don't give me that line about the site being hateful Islamic crap, I'm talking about the actual info in the links. Either document some inaccuracies in the links, or stop reverting them. For that matter, you never did resolve the questionable issue of plagiarizing HN for the Belz page without citing it. Maybe I should go and stick those back in there, too.ShalomShlomo 05:22, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: HasidicNews AGAIN?

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:48, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Zerotalk 11:52, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  coronavirus