lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:O. J. Matthijs Jolles

message: I have responded to your copyright concerns (immediately below) with more background (at bottom).
Chris Bassford
----
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as O. J. Matthijs Jolles, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.clausewitz.com/CWZHOME/Bassford/Chapter19.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:O. J. Matthijs Jolles. Then you should do one of the following:
:*Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:O. J. Matthijs Jolles where we can find that note; or
:*Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:O. J. Matthijs Jolles.
It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! TheRingess 05:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[O. J. Matthijs Jolles]]
Talk:Arlington Group

message: A number of organizations have been added to the membership section. Two or more organizations are often associated with an individual because one is a non-profit (generally restricted from political activity) and the other is a political action organization. I've adopted the convention of naming the usually commonly-known non-profit first. The added names are generally those of national interest or scope; there are many more on the Arlington Group website. Mike Doughney 07:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of membership organization names 
Talk:The Mercury (Hobart)

message: A number of POV items have been removed - further reinsertions of these would need to comply with wikipedia MOS - and also RS and N - SatuSuro 15:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversions
Talk:European Launcher Development Organisation

message: The article states that Europa is a greek god while linking to a Wikipedia page that says that it is a mythological princess. Not sure if she should not at least be called a godess (I mean since we say princess and not prince), but afaiks the mere "fact" that Zeus took her away did not make her such. Or maybe I don't understand it correctly. JB. --92.193.248.39 (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  God ? 

message: While the British and French stages are refered to by their names (Blue Streak, Coralie) the 3rd stage is just called "the German stage" although I think it would be more consistent to mention its name (Astris) as well. JB. --92.193.248.39 (talk) 21:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astris
Talk:Schwing

message: what does the stuff about gaelic mean there, that makes no sense to me... 170.65.188.1 08:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Conseil scolaire Viamonde

message: Checkuser confirms that the above user is WikiWoo/GST2006. JChap2007 01:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plato2100

message: Why are there in the list?  conseil scolaire 56 must have an official name.  Also, the Ottawa region has both a public and a catholic Board.  Most of the articles linked from here are linking to public boards so perhaps that`s where these links should be pointing.
# Conseil scolaires de district 56
# Ottawa-Carleton French-language School Board
Quite a history in the archives here... glad to see that`s quieted down.  --Renrenren 01:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  other school boards 

message: JoanOfArc2, CDSCSO2, and CDSCSO3 are clearly WikiWoo and have been blocked. Lexicon (talk) 02:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WikiWoo's IP, 216.154.134.91, has also been blocked. Lexicon (talk) 02:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiWoo again 
Talk:Clyde Butcher

message: I just finished cleaning up some edits on the page and was wondering if anyone sees anything that I missed?  Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by G3funk (talk • contribs) 15:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missed Points 

message: With all the recognition he appears to have received, someone interested in this photographer needs to do the work of finding Reliable Sources - published news and magazine articles - to document this content, or all the awards can be removed. Now, almost nothing about his career is documented.Parkwells (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs sources and cites
Talk:Johnny Hodges

message: ...does anyone have the sourcing information? - i've removed the 'citequote' tags which i don't think help much, and i've left the quotes in because they're uncontroversial and accurate, but it would be great to get a decent source... Purples 01:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the quotes in the article 

message: In the lede it's stated that Hodges "refused to play soprano after 1946," yet the inline citation reference states 1940.  Why the six year difference?
Also, no where is it mentioned why he stopped playing the soprano sax.  Anybody know why?
Just curious. 2600:8800:785:9400:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 10:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soprano sax 

message: It's stated that "The two men's discographies thus match almost exactly, bar exceptions listed above and in this section." which isn't true at all, Johnny Hodges made a lot of recordings with "Johnny Hodges and His Orchestra" starting in 1937. 
https://www.discogs.com/artist/843805-Johnny-Hodges-And-His-Orchestra
--OpenFuture (talk) 14:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography without Ellington
Talk:Homotopical connectivity

message: n-connected is an expression used in graph theory too, right? I'm not an expert, I was just looking for its definition for graphs. --Cyhawk 08:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and there now seems to be a link to the relevant article before the content of this one. 174.116.253.167 (talk) 04:45, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Grossmont High School

message: This article needs work... whoever had wrote the campus section had no idea how to spell. 
Nonetheless to say I fixed it.
njmm     mm mn n  b v tfrhyjuklmjhb ncfgb,hju  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:8200:36B0:FC62:64F2:429E:C5E8 (talk) 02:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  uh... 

message: A good number of these sections look like they were written by school board members looking to promote the school. Curriculum needs cleanup, and so does the majority of the information from top down. --72.207.108.54 (talk) 04:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues so far 

message: This definitely needs help. I will be working with proper inline references. So for now I put the reflist so whoever is involved in this article can help with figuring out where each reference link should go. Klapouchy (talk) 00:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper inline citations 
Talk:Gerhard Wilck

message: This comment was in the article:
According to the American magazine WWII quarterly, Journal of the second world war,  Wilck's wife and kids were under threat of death by the SS if he surrendered to the allies. I'd like to know what happened to the family, after he did surrender.
(added to the main article at 08:59, 25 October 2009 by 71.112.251.16}
I moved it here.  75.69.0.58 (talk) 21:59, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by 71.112.251.16
Talk:Egyptian Hall

message: The Egyptian Hall was also the site for a very popular two-part exhibition of Mexican antiquites brought back by Bullock himself and later sold to the British Museum, where a selection of them can be seen today in the Mexican Gallery.  Should this be added to the article?  The Egyptian Hall, and Bullock himself, have also rec'd much scholarly attention of late.  Are you interested in posting these citations?  Full disclosure.  I have written extensively on Bullock but have been warned by minders of over self-promotion.  Your call.  Rdaguirre 23:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This rather important figure is mispelled.  Rdaguirre 23:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haydon, not Hayden 

message: The article gave a date of 1903 (which seems to have been sourced from arthurlloyd.co.uk), however there are problems with this. A good source cited in the John Nevil Maskelyne article says his company were resident at Egyptian Hall until 1904. Also the source at georgianindex.net gives a demolition date of 1905. I have changed the date in the article to 1905 as this seems better supported.Circusandmagicfan (talk) 07:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Demolition date

message: I've removed some material about an "urban legend" and Mothman.  To be honest I found some of it very hard to understand.  It seemed very implausible, and needs reliable sources.  Richard Pinch (talk) 06:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The same banned user has been pasting the incoherent "anagram of Maskmelin" stuff to this and other articles since March, from anonymous IP addresses. I get the impression it's just a bad autotranslation of his own self-published conspiracy theories; Google only turns up the same text on other wiki projects with less strict sourcing requirements. --McGeddon (talk) 09:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urban legend
Talk:Evroniani

message: I'm pretty sure they are called just "Evron(s)" in the English version (though I can't say 100% for sure having only read the Norwegian translations). Evroniani is the Italian name, and the series is drawn in Italy, but this is the English Wikipedia, so we should be using the "official" English name, not the "original" Italian (unless I'm mistaken and they are the same). --Sherool (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I don't really about English name of Evroniani. I don't even know if the first series was ever published in English as the other two. Cuttyflam 19:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:National Association of College and University Residence Halls

message: I could have sworn the IACURH mascot was called Spank T. Monkey. Is it a former name that has been deleted from history to maintain a cleaner image? Or was it unofficial? - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 21:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A reference to something explaining that would be great. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 18:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was looking for a supporting document, since that comes from my memory of sitting in the boardroom for way too many hours, but alas -- I couldn't find any reference to it. Until I can back that up with something other than my memory, I won't be adding it. jtowns 10:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... there must have been a resolution, right? - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 08:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mascots 

message: I'm starting to wonder if constantly updating this page every time an RBD flips a member (which happens at least once a year, pretty much) is encyclopedic. Would there be enough material to make meaningful articles on each region? - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 08:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RBDs 

message: What, exactly is the problem with a link to a social networking site?  The LinkedIn group is a bona fide NACURH alumni group (take a look at the members).  Does it violate a rule to have a link to it?  Thanks in advance.  CRStengel (talk) 05:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links
Talk:Paul Gonsalves

message: Greetings All,
I was brought up to admire Gonsalves as a major force in jazz - surely he deserves a better article ... Regards, --Technopat (talk) 23:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major clean-up required 
Talk:Bowl-out

message: Do they bowl at one wicket or three ? Can the article be specific on this ? Tintin (talk) 08:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that they bowl at an unguarded wicket, that is three stumps plus bails. -- ALoan (Talk) 11:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wickets 

message: As pretty as the picture is, could we have photo
Graemec2 12:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find one with acceptable copyright status, please add it. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it's a good idea that just needs to be nurtured. Reminiscent of clean room design. The drawings just need to be better. MrAngy 00:47, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better Picture

message: FYI Ganeshk (talk) 22:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image up for deletion on commons [[:Image:Bowl-out-nz-wi.JPG]] 

message: Can someone add a note to explain why professional cricketers miss completely so often in bowl outs but can place the ball so well when bowling normally? How hard can it be to hit an unguarded wicket as a professional bowler? Turkeyphant 15:25, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  misses 
Talk:Illinois Jacquet

message: Based on two documents discovered during his research for his Jacquet family history book: “The Sons and Daughters of Jean Baptiste Jacquet: A History of the Black Jacquet Families in Louisiana”,
Illinois Jacquet’s nephew Russell Jacquet-Acea has emphatically proven and declared that his uncle Illinois was born on 30 October 1919.  This is based on the 1920 census taken in January which says “Jean Baptist” (Illinois) was three months old, and the baptismal certificate which says Jean Baptiste (Illinois) was baptized in December of 1919.Rjacquet2 (talk) 19:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Malha Mall

message: Regarding some of the details in the entry, here are some sources confirming my edits. They are in Hebrew and I don't think they are particularly controversial points, so I'll refrain from inserting them inline, though others can do so if they are so inclined:
*Egged's depot at Malha
*I don't know that there is an official transliteration for קניון, but http://www.kenyonim.com/mall.asp?mid=6 prefers the previous; perhaps raise this on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Hebrew). Cheers, TewfikTalk 05:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The term Kanyon is a coinage from the root Kana. It is not Kenyon, and the spelling that some Hebrew-speaking Israeli chooses for a website is not proof of anything. Altogether there is no "official" transliteration policy in existence (look at the street signs in Israel) but as a translator who works for an English language newspaper in Israel, as well as someone who lives nearby and shops there, I know it is pronounced Kanyon. Of course this is hardly a life-or-death matter, but neither is most of the nitpicking on Wikipedia...As for the Egged station at Malcha, this plan has been around for years, but I see no facts on the ground. If it does happen, it's great, but the way you worded it makes it sound as if there is already such a system in operation. All the best, Gila--Gilabrand 05:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some details 
Talk:Kip-up

message: It seems to me like the first and last description in Hop Back to a Kip-up could well be the same thing. If so we should merge the two descriptions and if not we should clarify their difference. --MarSch 14:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After rereading the descriptions, I see your point. However, the two are different techniques are different. One hops backward in more of a back handspring and rebounds quicker like a spring. The Ditangquan variation jumps directly upward and then falls directly downward to the ground and lands as a breakfall. The practitioner pauses on the ground momentarily and then hops back up. The help distinguish the two I have tried to elaborate more on the descriptions. Please check back to see if is more clear. (Guyinblack25 20:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: the difference seems to be the same as between kip-up with hands and no-hand kip-up, although this difference is magnified by starting from a standing position. Is that correct? --MarSch 10:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and no, you've got the right idea. The execution is actually the main difference. The first one is executed like a back handspring, in which the person will essentially sit down on an imaginary chair and then hop backwards. The impact on the body is less as well because as you pointed out, the hands are there absorb some of it and help the body spring back. The Ditang one jumps straight up into the air and coils while in the air. If the body coiled while it hit the ground like in the first one, the impact would be lessened. But it doesn't, it falls straight down and the person throws their arms out as they hit to simulate a breakfall. I'll try to add more content about the hands to make it clearer. Also I'd just like to say thank you for the input, it's nice to get some feedback on articles like this that need to be very descriptive to illustrate actions. (Guyinblack25 14:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about a Ditang kip-up without the jumping up part? Do you think we should mention it, maybe just as a practice form for full Ditang kip-up? And split off Ditang kip-up from Hop Back to a Kip-up into its own subsection? Ideally we shall have a movie for each of the variants worth mentioning. Words can say only so much. I absorb your thank you and retaliate with a thank you too of my own. --MarSch 15:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reorganized the content a little bit, if you think it doesn't help convey the information appropriately, we can revert it. Also, it would be really nice if we had the actual Chinese name of that ditang breakfall. I guess we'll add that to the list of questions to ask the Wikipedia Martial Arts Project. (Guyinblack25 00:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I like it. I've massaged the text a bit. --MarSch 10:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hop Back to a Kip-up 

message: YungHam (talk) 07:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Observations and questions
Talk:Substitution model

message: I moved the descriptions of the DNA models to Models of DNA evolution because I think they fit better there. I would like to use this page more as overview of substitution models and to make it more generic (not only DNA but also protein and codon based models). I will include shortly a discussion of empricial vs. parametrical models and then summaries and discussions of common approaches taken for DNA, amino acids and codons. I hope this idea appeals also to previous contributors to this article. If not, please let us discuss the issues. Wild8oar 13:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a bit about the diagonalizable case (you might want to check it, though :-)) Tjunier (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it the case that a rate matrix Q is always diagonalizable?:  All of the off-diagonal entries of Q are non-negative and all of the diagonal entries of Q make each row sum to 0.0.  These guarantee a desired probabilistic interpretation and a desired Markov chain infinite divisibility condition; do they also guarantee diagonalizability?  Quantling (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind.  The matrix Q=\left(\begin{array}{rrr}-1 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 1\\ ~~0 & ~~0 & ~~0\end{array}\right) is not diagonalizable.  Quantling (talk) 17:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagonalizability of Q 

message: Hello. The matrix in the section GTR: Generalised time reversible was transposed but it is not in accordance with the defintion. --kupirijo (talk) 11:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: support: I agree, the matrix has columns summing to zero rather than rows summing to zero, and needs to be transposed.  Care to do it?  Quantling (talk) 16:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Oh, I see.  Another article, Models of DNA evolution, has columns summing to zero instead of rows summing to zero.  We could just transpose the matrix in Substitution model, so that each article is self-consistent, but it would probably be better to make both articles use the same convention.  My preference is for row vectors, i.e., that rows sum to zero in these instantaneous rate matrices, but we should look at any other relevant articles.  Quantling (talk) 20:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

text: How do we go about the task of polling others for their opinions on the issue of row-vector convention vs. column-vector convention in these related articles?   Quantling (talk) 20:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want a general, Wikipedia-wide convention, you can try asking at the WikiProject talk page: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Statistics. You can also try a Request for comment, but that's only if this is a moderate-to-major issue--otherwise, feel free to be bold and change everything yourself. —fetch·comms 20:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transposed matrix 

message: Looking for the T92 Howitzer Motor Carriage, I was redirected from "T92" to this article. This redirect baffles me, since I cannot fathom (or grep, for that matter) what "T92" has to do with "Substitution model"? -- DevSolar (talk) 09:04, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected from T92?
Talk:Models of DNA evolution

message: I'm sorry I can do this myself at the moment, but there is a lot of excitement surrounding "Lie Markov" nucleotide models, and this page should be updated to reflect this.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.31.169.120 (talk) 05:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Update page with Lie Markov Models

message: As written, the HKY85 model matrix is the transpose of what it should be when multiplying times a column vector as introduced earlier in the page. The rate of transitions from T to A should be \pi_A, so that there is a greater chance of transitioning to a base when its frequency at equilibrium is higher. Transposing the matrix is also required to work with the statement that the rows of Q must sum to zero earlier in the page. Several of the other matrices are also transposed. If there are no objections, I'll make these changes. JeffreyBarrick (talk) 18:57, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HKY85 model matrix is transposed

message: Could somebody dumb this article down, or create a more generalized version of it so that someone who doesn't have a degree in chemistry, physics or mathematics can pretend they derived some type of understanding form it? If that's too much, could someone point me in the direction of trying to understand this? I'm looking for something just a little deeper than WP's abiogenesis article.19:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry for being so frank, but — what the fuck is this? — Mütze (talk) 19:56, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: My eyes have glazed over and I must scream

message: The need for things like this edit is somewhat depressing.
: 
WP:MOS really does exist.
: 
So does WP:MOSMATH.  Maybe missionaries from civilized countries will bring that to this article some day..... Michael Hardy (talk) 11:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOS exists.  Really. 

message: The text "Similarly, for any  x\ , let the rate of change to  x\  be" seems to be wrong. It should say the rate of change from  x\ . Otherwise, the middle term in the following equation (after "The changes in the probability distribution...") doesn't make sense. That middle term, according to the description that follows it, is supposed to be the rate of losing existing A's. Hence the change to from above. Terrycojones (talk) 12:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deriving the dynamics of substitution
Talk:Iraqi National Symphony Orchestra

message: A portion of the article came from .  As far as I can tell, it's content written by the US Government, and so is .  --Interiot 09:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)