lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Penal code

message: Since this article is a bit lacking and I have no knowledge of it, here's a suggestion to someone who might know the history of penal codes:
* where and when did the first penal code start?
* when did the penal codes for some countries appear (just some examples)?
Cburnett 15:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: I'm opposed to this merger - a penal code is any municipal law defining criminal offences for a wrongful act committed against the state, and specifying a corresponding punishment.  That is to be contrasted with a criminal code, which is a collection of serious criminal offences and procedures that codifies criminal law principles and major offences.  A criminal code does not generally rely on the common law, whereas a penal code may rely on some common law concepts.  therefore.. THEY SHOULD ABSOLUTELY BE MERGED!!!!!  Sambo 12:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Criminal Code]]
Talk:Business casual

message: Not sure about it, but perhaps it could be worth considering. Does the scope of business casual really merit a standalone article separate from that of smart casual? Compare that the informal wear is also called "business wear". Chicbyaccident (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  From where did you get that assertion? (Please note that I am the same user as the nominator above but with new username). PPEMES (talk) 10:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. Are we ready to establish that business casual is just a corporate buzzword for smart casual? And even if it wasn't, interpretations of the both overlap to a degree and with borders so vague that having two articles still doesn't make sense anyway? Compare that the article suit includes the asserted notion of "business suit". (Please note that I am the same user as the nominator above but with new username). PPEMES (talk) 11:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  As stated below, this is your opinion.  usernameisentered, what is the basis of your support of this proposal? Toddst1 (talk) 14:12, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

text: Well, conversely, do we have sources that determine a clear distinction of the two terms? PPEMES (talk) 16:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's an absurd argument.  I don't have sources determining a clear distinction between "duck" and "Ferrari" either.   Toddst1 (talk) 16:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

text: What's the difference? PPEMES (talk) 15:40, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[smart casual]]?
Talk:List of Konami games

message: In the Xbox One and PS4 sections of this page, there is a game listed named Project Fog (プロジェクトの霧), set to release in 2021, however I cannot find any reference to it online. Does this project exist?
144.62.220.200 (talk) 02:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project fog 

message: Just to point out that the IGN reference is not complete. The current wiki page has more information than the IGN page so we should add more references. For example,Bio Miracle Bokutte Upa is not on IGN's konami page, nor is there a list of Famicom disk system games.Bragador 16:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just passing through... From what I can figure out Combat School was the Japanese name for the original release, then changed to Boot Camp for US.  Does it need two entries? Oh Snap (talk) 18:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boot Camp / Combat School

message: Well, I can't go through Thrill Drive 1, 2 and 3, due to a redirected link that it was unable to move the path again by Lankiveil, an Australian Wikipedian. And I must find that, but still nothing happens, it stucks there for a moment... So, I would find a way there... --The Game Expert   (talk) 08:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Can't find the specific link path

message: What order is the list of platforms in? I was about to add Nintendo Switch - Super Bomberman R, but I have no idea where to slot Nintendo Switch into this list.
It seems to start out alphabetically bith "3D0" and "Arcade", but about half way down seems basically random.
Horseloverfat (talk) 23:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Two years later, and the question asked by Horseloverfat still stands: what's the basis for the platform order? At first it looks like it's alphabetical, then appears to be based on platform type or system manufacturer, then on home and handheld consoles, and then it makes little to no sense and seems to lack any rational basis. Indeed, it looks as if they were added purely at random, with no fixed or intended order at all. — Holothurion (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Seven years later, I suggest to turn this into a table. Cortador (talk) 07:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform order
Talk:Anybody Killa

message: I have added and assessed the WikiProject Crime banner and assessed for the WikiProject Organized crime banner primarily on the basis of his musical style including gangsta rap. Aside from his art, there is no indication this person has been directly involved in any sort of crime or criminal organization. Apart from this artist's style of music-making, there is nothing in the article content to indicate why this article should be of interest to these assigned WikiProjects. If you are aware of additional sources of information not included in the article that further support these WikiProject assignments, please identify those source(s) and add that additional information to the article. If you disagree with this assessment for these WikiProjects, please explain your disagreement and justify why these WikiProjects should be removed, if you do remove them. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 04:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject assessments
Talk:President's Park

message: Since this page is about the NPS unit of President's Park, it should say Lafayette Park.  I agree though that there should be a separate page dealing with the history of Lafayette Square, the surrounding buildings and the historic district (which comprises buildings not directly on the Square). This page could even be edited to note that Lafayette Park is within Lafayette Square. 
01:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Park or Square

message: The survey that found Lafayette Park to be the home of the densest squirell pop known to science was done between 1980 - 1981. Haven't found any info to dispute this but certainly there should be a line that gives a disclaimer along the lines of "30 years ago this was true, but who knows if it still is..." Thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.181.38.50 (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Densest squirrel population?

message: L'Enfant identified himself as "Peter Charles L'Enfant" during most of his life, while residing in the United States. (See: Bowling, Kenneth R (2002). Peter Charles L'Enfant: vision, honor, and male friendship in the early American Republic. George Washington University, Washington, D.C.)  He wrote this name on his "Plan of the city intended for the permanent seat of the government of t(he) United States ...." (Washington, D.C.) and on other legal documents. However, during the early 1900's, a French ambassador to the U.S., Jean Jules Jusserand, popularized the use of L'Enfant's birth name, "Pierre Charles L'Enfant". (See: Bowling (2002). The National Park Service identifies L'Enfant as "Major Peter Charles L'Enfant" and as "Major Pierre (Peter) Charles L'Enfant" on its website. The United States Code states in : "(a) In General.—The purposes of this chapter shall be carried out in the District of Columbia as nearly as may be practicable in harmony with the plan of Peter Charles L'Enfant." The 2010 edition of the United States Capitol Historical Society's calendar identified L'Enfant as "Peter L'Enfant" in the legend of its picture for the month of November. For those reasons, all Wikipedia articles should identify L'Enfant as "Pierre (Peter) Charles L'Enfant", rather than as "Pierre Charles L'Enfant" or as "Pierre L'Enfant. Corker1 (talk) 01:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of Pierre (Peter) Charles L'Enfant

message: The infobox says the park is 18.07 acres but in the text it says that one component, The Ellipse, is 52 acres!!? Is it just me or does something not add up? 92.40.248.126 (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How big is it?
Talk:Business activity monitoring

message: *Listing of selected companies can be seen as representing bias or endorsing more weight on a few "selected' companies.  It's probably best to continue keeping sections like this out of the article in order to maintain Wikipedia's Neutral point of view
*As policy states, Wikipedia is not a repository for lists, directories or Advocacy of commercial products and/or websites. NPOV requires views to be represented without bias, this applies not only to article text, but to companies, products, external links, and any other material as well. Although it may have been helpful in the past, it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a comprehensive list of companies, products or external links.
*Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, its not for individuals or companies to promote products or websites that they have an interest in. However, I'd like to help you by suggesting Yellowikis which can be found here for something of this nature. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.77.187.21 (talk) 11:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Company Endorsements and Products Section
Talk:Pennsylvania Avenue National Historic Site

message: Hi,
I think this should be merged with the article Pennsylvania Avenue. Dmford13 (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with Pennsylvania Avenue article
Talk:Brainwashing 101/archive

message: OK, we now have a new problem. Should the critical article be referred to as "unsigned" and should the article claim that it was "probably" written by this professor Geoff S.?
I don't think it's such a big deal, however to be proper, the article is not actually "unsigned" -- it is described as "Catalyst's response" to the film; it is no more "unsigned" than an Editorial in the Wall Street Journal. 
Furthermore, there is no source that suggests or alleges that the professor Geoff S. wrote the article, and Geoff S. does not appear on Catalyst's editorial board. Geoff S. may indeed have written the article, but unless there is an external source that suggests this, wikipedia cannot include it (per wikipedia rules, everything contentious must be attributed to an external source.)
Sdedeo 19:24, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

message: -------------
Here's my view:
Why have the same criticisms from essentially the same source listed twice? List it once, and list it from the original source, not once from the original source, and then once again from another source that is clearly a derivative of the original source.
--Wicky P. Dee-uh
:Well, they are different sources. You have also removed more than just the source, you've removed content from article. In particular, you've removed a description of the criticism. Please take a look at Roger and Me to see how we handle controversial documentaries; in particular, we don't just say "the film was criticized", we also include some of the content of that criticism.
:Including both the Catalyst and Schneider criticisms is something a number of people have now agreed upon. Could we do it a different way? Yes, we could. Is the way we have it right now just fine, consistent with wikipedia rules and traditions? Yes. Is this way something that a number of people have settled on? Yes. So we should leave it alone.
:I noticed you also want to change "many" to "some"; that is fine, and we've now made that change.
:Also, welcome to wikipedia.
:Sdedeo 17:13, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New Round of Edits
Talk:James Mitchell (actor)

message: I dispute that Mitchell now holds the record for the most daytime emmy nominations without a win.  Perhaps it should be rewored to include the words "acting categories".  The gigantic Star Jones (and lets hope she never wins) also has 7 noms with no wins. Dowew 16:31, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any information/reference to his Longtime Partner Albert Wolsky??
Article at Advocate.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctroutwi (talk • contribs) 12:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albert Wolsky 
Talk:Basketball Australia

message: Why is Robert Rose not in the HOF? Sirshaun (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hall of Fame Inductee
Talk:Australian Olympic Committee

message: The article links the name 'Craig Phillips' of the AOC to 'Craig Phillips' of Big Brother. They're not the same person, so that should probably be cleared up. --220.237.5.38 07:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Disclaimer - I work for the Australian Olympic Committee
Updating the NOC infobox to reflect that John Coates and Matt Carroll fill the roles of the President and Secretary-General respectively.
I plan on discussing a change to the infobox to add a "CEO" field in that article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanexner (talk • contribs) 02:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status changes to NOC box
Talk:Gregg Hoffman

message: Exactly how does someone die from natural causes at 42? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.72.89.168 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 6 December 2005
: Your heart stops.  Could be illness, stroke, heart attack, etc...Just means it's probably not drugs, violence or an accident. Article says they will be doing an autopsy. Wikibofh 16:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC
::You're missing the point. Dying at 42 isn't natural by any means, especially of heart failure. Come on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:D100:5FC:1458:9982:1894:484D (talk) 03:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: He was rushed to a hospital by apparently a very concerned friend/family/neighbor who has been tight-lipped about it. Let the man's family not be dragged through the mud on this one & respect his privacy. Tomato expert1 (talk) 08:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

text: There is no way he died of "natural causes" at 42. The company he worked for released that statement BEFORE autopsy, wtf. Just because it isn't favorable to his or his family's ego, omitting information and ignoring basic reason like the above comments is abhorrent. 
https://www.backstage.com/magazine/article/movie-producer-gregg-hoffman-dies-13989/ 2600:8801:D100:5FC:1458:9982:1894:484D (talk) 03:43, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

text: So publicly posting information the family would rather keep secret is LESS abhorrent? Should we start outing the names of rape victims too? I mean, the public has a right to know, right? Where do you draw the line? It's not like he's a big deal celebrity-wise anyway. I doubt the public is any worse for wear that someone with a parapgraph's worth of a life isn't getting the full monty in the article. 209.6.200.92 (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Natural causes?
Talk:Cycling Australia

message: In November 2020 Cycling Australia merged with state organisations governing the different cycling disciplines to become AusCycling. Should this page be updated to better reflect this change or should there be a new page for AusCycling? Davidreid (talk) 09:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  AusCycling
Talk:Stantonbury School

message: Standtonbury always used to have two co-principals because it was so big.  Is that not true any more? --Concrete Cowboy 19:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principal/Principals? 

message: The text needs to be neutral in tone and not just a rehash of the school prospectus.  There is a risk that others may feel that they need to redress the balance. 
Please remember to comply with the Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:cite your sources. --Concrete Cowboy 21:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant and should have said that the first bit read like a school prospectus. Now that you've sourced it, it is fine.  I didn't have as much problem with the curriculum and visits bit, that could go back if it is sourced in the same way. --Concrete Cowboy 23:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not a school prospectus 

message: Why was the name changed? In which ways is it international? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  International?
Talk:Troy Bell

message: can anyone update this to what Troy Bell is currently doing or where he is playing? I haven't heard anything about him in a while.--Alhutch 16:52, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-12-05/DDR copyright

message: It is not sufficiently clear from reading the article that the violating edits do not come from inside Deutsche Telekom, but are from dynamic IP ranges servicing DT's clients. (DT is the largest German ISP, akin to AOL in the United States.) -- Marcika 16:58, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Any possibility that any of the deleted articles were translated to the English Wikipedia? Have they checked this? Tfine80 18:38, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I'm guessing nobody has really checked. Obviously it's possible, but considering the limited scope and success of article translation efforts generally, I'm mildly doubtful. --Michael Snow 06:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Racial color blindness

message: Seems like a pretty egregious violation of WP:NPOV to have a "Criticism" section that is more than twice as long as any other section of the article. The "Support" section has a single dismissive line noting that multiple US presidents have supported the idea, while giving multiple paragraphs to obscure sociologists and their theories, in a section that is already comically bloated. That reeks of POV to me. BUZZLIGHTYEAR99 (talk) 02:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are problems with having separate "Criticism" and "Support" sections (see  above) but length is not one of them. We don't give equal page space to claims for and against Moon landing conspiracy theories either. Feel free to cite independent, reliable sources that establish the relative weight of any opinions mentioned in the article. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Criticism" and POV 

message: The article could say more about whether color-blindness (of the kind that specifically excludes class-blindness and economic-conditions-blindness) remains a valid goal for the future, even though you acknowledge that today's society is anything but color-blind. Also it could say more about whether cultures with a lot higher proportion of interracial couples and bi- or multi-racial children than the US fare better in this regard. Also whether cultures where no racial group ever mass-enslaved another group fare better. -- 91.63.148.93 (talk) 13:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color-blindness as future goal vs as current state of affairs 

message: This article urgently needs a decent section on the history of this concept. For example, it does not mention Wendell Phillips, who was the first person to make the phrase popular, in the context of arguing for abolition. It would be really helpful to hear what role this idea played in the civil rights movement, etc. What about Thurgood Marshall? Doric Loon (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Plas Newydd (Anglesey)

message: Does anyone have a picture we could use? :) Brookie: A collector of little round things 17:21, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture needed please

message: What about the 28 cromlechs this place is supposed to have? Savatar 03:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[cromlech]]

message: Part of the house was occupied by HMS Conway. HMS Conway was despite its title not a Royal Navy establishment, but rather a training ship under the governance of the MMSA (Merchant Marine Service Association). Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[royal navy]] 

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Natasha Demkina

message: Dreadstar, I'm not sure how this stuff works, but it looks to me like this edit of yours has set Miszabot to archive this page pretty aggressively (archiving threads more than 7 days old). Is that it? If so, what for? That's the way blindingly busy talkpages like Talk:William Shakespeare are archived. The slow-moving talkpages of obscure pages like Natasha Demkina will normally be archived by hand, when they get too long to load easily. Currently, this page covers discussion back to 2007, and it's still not particularly long! Surely it's useful for newer editors to have easy access to earlier discussions right on the page itself, so they don't have to keep re-inventing the wheel? I have only slightly edited your template (fixing a typo). Perhaps it has a purpose I don't understand. But if I'm right about what it does, I would ask you to remove it. Bishonen | talk 15:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey Bish, thanks for fixing the typo in the mizabot configuration.  The aggressive timing was only a temporarily setting meant to quickly archive the very old sections going back to 2007; I planned to increase the length of time after the first pass.  I've gone ahead and changed it to 90 days instead of a week.  Hopefully that's satisfactory for everyone!  Dreadstar ☥  17:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Thanks. Bishonen | talk 18:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miszabot archive template 

message: The text in the lead Center of Special Diagnostics of the Natalya Demkina (TSSD) is clearly the product of a translation tool. I'm not competent to do a better job, but I suggest Demkina Center of Special Diagnostics (TSSD). From the initials it's hard to see where Natalya comes in. Spicemix (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, this awkward wording STILL has not been fixed by some-one who is competent.  Please help! Kdammers (talk) 05:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

text: According to the newspapers (http://www.kp.ru/daily/23641/48779/) back in 2006 she was working for the Center of special human diagnostics (Russian: Центр специальной диагностики человека), perhaps still existing in Moscow. But for sure it was not hers. Maybe someone will settle the problem? Igor Makhankov (talk) 08:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: "The Tokyo test was reviewed by three Japanese experts: the occult critic Hajime Yuumu, the psychologist Hiroyuki Ishii, and the Tondemo-bon Society skeptic Hiroshi Yamamoto. The results of Dr. Machi's tests and a panel discussion by the three critics aired on Fuji Television on May 12, 2005."  So, what were their takes? Kdammers (talk) 05:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened in Tokyo? 

message: Bshjsjrjr 46.106.174.142 (talk) 14:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingilizce
Talk:Noise measurement

message: Noise topics are not good candidates for disambiguation because of the common root and hierachical nature. Please expand, and link, but avoid splitting.  See Noise.  --Lindosland 17:28, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Run Ronnie Run!

message: I changed the positive reviews sentence, as what I looked at at the provided link showed mostly scores slightly on the positive side of average, and some rating it pretty low. Almost no real strong positives. -R. fiend 17:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: Run Ronnie Run was screened at the 2002 Sundance Film Festival in Utah.  I just added that.  Also, I have heard rumors that there is another version of the film with less edits in it, but have no references. Chud50 05:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sundance