lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Indo-Pakistani war of 1965

message: No territorial changes were made 2001:1970:5262:9A00:C89F:2F0E:4828:1F48 (talk) 00:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan in the case won the war 

message: , the addition of positions and rank is contrary to the documentation at Template:Infobox military conflict. These should not have been re-added. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooh that is my bad. I hadnt read that portion. You can remove those. >>> Extorc.talk 06:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Positions and ranks in infobox
Talk:Edward Pawley

message: Probably needs style cleanup. Added to User:Ganymead/Desk. -- Beland 07:27, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ganymead appears to be away from Wikipedia.  Moving to User:Goeagles4321/Desk. -- Beland 07:35, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Taskforce log 
Talk:Cording (dog grooming)

message: Earlier today I added the 2nd paragraph on how hard it is to care for a corded coat.  Now I see that Havanese says "...which is hard to start but easy to care for when completed.".  So, really, is it easy or tough? I'm basing my comments on the one person I know who does dog agility with his Puli.  Comes to class all tied up with dozens of ribbons and clips and wearing leggings and things. After class, every week, spends probably 30-45 minutes cleaning out all the little bits of everything that have collected in the coat.  This doesn't strike me as being easy maintenance. Comments?  Elf | Talk 02:55, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: How easy is cording to care for, really?
Talk:Gigabit Ethernet

message: The copper table has a line code column, but not the fiber table.  Can we have one? Gah4 (talk) 05:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This information is listed in the respective table header already. There is no separate column, because this specification is identical for most entries. Please also note that the table follows a unified formatting throughout several articles which should be preserved. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 01:06, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  line code 

message: The table in Fiber optics specifies that 1000BASE‑SX can be used at a range of 1km on OM3 grade cable. This is an outlier; all other multi-mode limits are 550m, even on the longer-wavelength 1000BASE‑LX. The OM3 figure is not part of the 802.3z-1998 standard, as OM3 was introduced in 2003. I could not find a source for the 1km figure, and found a conflicting source specifying 860m. If a reliable source can be found, is it ok to include this datum, or should the table not include data outside of the relevant standard at all? Belden.stephen (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Information outside the standards must be well sourced or should be removed. Perhaps we should mark those claims with  before removing them outright. --Zac67 (talk) 21:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I did further research and found 3 independent sources which verify this claim. It seems to be at least an industry standard, so probably has value remaining in the table. I have added the most reputable of the sources I found. Belden.stephen (talk) 06:13, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should data outside of published standards be included in tables?
Talk:New Zealand National Party

message: The National party’s  main ideology is liberal conservatism. This needs to be the main ideology of the National party on the Wikipedia page of the National party. 125.236.143.212 (talk) 13:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The existing ideology has a high-quality source. What is your source?-gadfium 19:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal conservatism  

message: The main intro lists the National Party as "New Zealand National Party Rōpū Nāhinara o Aotearoa"
Luxon has come out publicly that he dislikes Maori names being used. 
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/132148491/christopher-luxon-worries-its-hard-to-understand-mori-names-what-bubble-is-he-in
Only 1 party member is Maori, and they have clarified that they will not be aligning with any Maori party.
Is the use of the Maori name for National really consistent with their own party policy? Jaybest (talk) 07:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The main intro lists the National Party as "New Zealand National Party Rōpū Nāhinara o Aotearoa".  No it doesn't.  It states the party's name in English, and then, parenthetically, states its name in Māori.  This is consistent with many other Wikipedia pages on New Zealand topics, and is supported by a reference (to a National Party document).  Unless National were to publicly state that they no longer wish to use this Māori name, we should continue to note it here. PatricKiwi (talk) 15:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Party being against use of Maori words?
Category talk:Photography museums and galleries

message: Unnecessary subcategory—most art museums include different media, and I don't believe there are too many that cater just to photography.  They can all just be included in the proper country subcategory of :Category:Art galleries and museums without anything really being lost, unless we also want :Category:Painting museums, :Category:Sculpture museums...  Postdlf 02:23, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Archival discussion moved from [[Wikipedia:Categories for Deletion]]
Talk:Apple event

message: Um... the whole article has been written in the past tense. Aren't they still called AppleEvents? And isn't the AEDesc still the underlying data structure for messages sent from OSA languages? I'm not an expert at how these things are implemented, but these terms are certainly still used within the AppleScript community. func(talk) 04:51, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, no idea why that was the case. Anyways, I have changed it to present tense. RedWolf 03:44, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
Also, ("he said 8 months later"), shouldn't we make the article name singlular, via standing wikipedia procedure, as in AppleEvent? func(talk) 17:11, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

text: While the singular form makes sense, the term "Apple Events" is almost always used in plural form. One rarely finds a singular use when dealing with them. --Dcclark 05:27, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be nice if there could be some clarification of the relationship/differences between D-BUS and Apple Events, since they are apparently both supported on Mac. Jdpipe (talk) 01:22, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to D-BUS?
Talk:Michael Jackson (disambiguation)

message: Michael Jackson is also the name of a radio host here in the Los Angeles area...  I forget whether he's on KFI 640 or KABC-AM 790.  I don't know if he is a radio host now, but I know I've heard him within the last 5 years. -- Myria 05:12, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Michael Jacksons

message: removed vandalism: "i like little boys" and "jackson likes little boys"
is it just me or is this article missing the most famous micheal jackson?  (prolly removed by vandals)
-Mariokarter
:Look over here: :Michael Jackson. The disambiguation page is only for "For other persons named Michael Jackson" IntinnTalk! 09:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Hi, I think "Michael Jackson: The Legend Continues" & "Michael Jackson: 30th Anniversary Special" are not ambiguous (diferent name space). Both articles talk about "Michael Jackson (born 1958), U.S. singer-songwriter".
"Michael Jackson", alone, is a really pretty ambiguous name.--Carloluca (talk) 12:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name space
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive (gender-neutral pronouns)

message: Possibly I miscounted. My tally is six people voted for No. 2, and the other choices got four votes (myself, Benc, JamesMLane, and Filiocht).
I'm not pushing for detail, just trying to find what's least objectionable to the most people.
How about these choices, in order by length:
#Generally avoid making wholesale changes to others users' preferences.
#Try to avoid using gender-specific pronouns if you can. When they are necessary, try to avoid an impression of exclusivity.
#Many people see gender-neutral pronouns as important, but possible solutions are controversial. We do have consensus on striving for clarity, avoiding wholesale changes of other users' preferences, and considering a broad range of alternatives. 
I'll take either No. 1 or No. 3. 
Both addresse the original problem, both are based on broad areas of agreement, and I think "he" is often OK, or at least no worse than the most commonly used alternatives. - Maurreen 04:33, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  New choices? -- Second vote 

message: True or false: there has been enough discussion about gender-neutral language so that we should have a poll on what pronouns to use. 66.245.118.119 01:11, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Not just yet.  I just arrived and ask:  Why can not the people who object to the generalized singular "he" consider that the females whom this usage purportedly disrespects might better consider themselves honored by having a pronoun all their own?Sfahey 23:10, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: True or false??
Talk:Adaptive coding

message: This article needs serious work.  It is improperly restricted to arithmetic coding when it is a far more general technique, and it is (in my judgement) almost incomprehensible to anyone who does not already understand what adaptive coding is.  -- Antaeus Feldspar 05:30, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: There seems to be an impression that some entropy coding methods are adaptive, and some are static. This is not the case. Any method has static variants and adaptive variants. For example, Huffman coding can use a data model based on English text that is agreed upon by encoder and decoder, so not transmitted. Or it can make a first pass over the data to create a model and transmit that. These are both static variants. Huffman coding can also be adaptive, with many variations on how to adapt the data model.
The difficulty with the term "adaptive coding" is that it encompasses so many particular methods, so the description should be general, especially as a contrast with static coding. But describing a particular method might also be illustrative. For instance, a technique for creating an adaptive Huffman tree would be useful. The danger is that the impression might be left that it is the only way to implement adaptive Huffman coding. 
Scottcraig 20:13, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adaptive variants
Talk:Tyalië Tyelelliéva

message: give me a break, please. I am working on a whole series of articles related to Tolkien scholarship. A few hours after I created this stub, it was noted as "of doubtful notability". More material will follow, and this journal plays a role in the posthumous publication of Tolkien's works. This is not an article about some internet troll club, but about a serious publication of scientific value. dab 06:37, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel exactly the same way about the VT issue list. Perhaps there is some more compact way we could provide this information? Tables? Aranel ("Sarah") 14:19, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: go ahead. I would just like you to not remove the information. You can arrange it in tables, in smaller font, or in special "list" articles, as you prefer. I just like to have this information available because I have spent too much time digging for such things.... dab 14:59, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/to do

message: It's very surprising most of the 'to create' articles haven't
already got at least stubs.  Is there any reason why a three- or
four-line stub wouldn't be acceptable for all these entries?
That's why we're here! Speaking of that, how about registering an account, and helping out? Or if you've already got one, logging in... Ambi 06:47, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: I created a short Biography of Geoff Clark. Bobby1011 12:39, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geoff Clark 

message: If not already listed I am going to add these to the complete to do list, as the Template:Australia opentask is now being used. The the page could be deleted. - Shiftchange 12:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant so merge and delete?
Talk:Viscount Hampden

message: It seems that there was also an earlier Viscountcy of Hampden - see John Trevor, 3rd Viscount Hampden, the last Viscount Hampden of that line, who died in 1824. —Stormie 06:48, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)
: How's that?
: James F. (talk) 14:29, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Experimental mathematics

message: No substantial updates to the contents of this page for over 18 months. I think we can do a lot better. It needs a simple introduction, something on the history of the topic, and some example of results and ongoing research. I propose to do a substantial rewrite in a few days time, unless there are any objections. Gandalf61 14:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, finally got round to completing the proposed rewrite. Gandalf61 (talk) 11:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing rewrite 

message: I have added some material regarding some challenging mathematical physical problems, namely analytical solutions of the energy eigenvalues of a special case of the quantum mechanical three-body problem known as the Hydrogen molecule-ion in terms of a generalization of the Lambert W function and also an item related to the relativistic n-body problem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.171.96 (talk) 22:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: The following is not a good sentence if you squint at it, and not much of anything if you don't: 
It has been defined as "that branch of mathematics that concerns itself ultimately with the codification and transmission of insights within the mathematical community through the use of experimental (in either the Galilean, Baconian, Aristotelian or Kantian sense) exploration of conjectures and more informal beliefs and a careful analysis of the data acquired in this pursuit."
For my own notes, I rearranged it until I got this: 
It has been defined as that branch of mathematics concerned with the codification and transmission of insights through:
* experimental exploration of
** conjectures
*** in either the Galilean, Baconian, Aristotelian or Kantian sense
** and informal beliefs
* along with careful analysis of the data acquired in this pursuit.
Hmm. Is there a Galilean way to explore informal belief? If so, I've messed this up. 
The parse simply shouldn't be this difficult (I only got one that works for me after substantial reduction in unnecessary verbiage). — MaxEnt 04:45, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a good sentence if you squint
Talk:Seven (1995 film)

message: Should we list Kevin Spacey in the infobox, despite him not being on the billing block on the poster? So many editors think so. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_film says to use the billing block. $chnauzer 16:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The billing block was intentionally deceptive, because Spacey's participation was kept secret until the film's initial release. I don't pay much attention to film infoboxes, but should we be repeating information from deceptive sources? Dimadick (talk) 18:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Cute how you worded that... perhaps giving pause on the reliablility of a source that might be viewed as "deceptive". Anyway, (imho) no... we don't add Spacey to the infobox, we go with the original billing block, then list Spacey in the "Cast" section. That's how it's been done for years, supported by the infobox guidance and years of implied consensus. - wolf 05:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spacey - infobox or no.
Talk:Savilian Professor of Geometry

message: Started on wikification of article - though I wasn't signed in I just realised. I plan to come back to wikify list of holders of the position, but if anyone else wants to pitch in? --Cje 09:15, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This has improved out of all recognition from the near stub I added a few links to back in 2004. Kudos to all those who have worked on the article since then.
--Cje (talk) 13:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow!
Category talk:Trotskyist organizations

message: I think this category should be listed under socialist parties, rather than communist parties, as trotskyist parties usually if not always define themselve as socialist, and often, especially before 1991, in opposition to communist parties. Are there any objections to moving this category under socialist parties?
--Martin Wisse 09:28, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have already expressed my views. I am against "Socialist" instead of "Communist". Martin, your definition relies on a misunderstanding of the term "communist". Dahn 02:24, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Far Eastern Republic

message: The interventionists, the Whites, the refugees, all need to be discussed in this entry. Wetman 09:30, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 14:38, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Nominally independent? within the Soviet Union or was it its own country?
:The Far Eastern Republic was dissolved several weeks before the USSR was created.  Just as the article says, it was nominally independent (as in "its own country"; i.e. not a part of Russia), but was in fact controlled by the RSFSR.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 13:50, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
Can someone make a map? 219.77.98.22 02:44, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 20:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But the map is not correct. The Far Eastern Republic strechted along the Pacific Coast until Kamchatka --Roksanna 19:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No that is a really incorrect statement. Please link here something that prove this. Lajbi Holla @ me 21:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The map is copied from Történelmi világatlasz, Budapest, Hungary, 1991, Kartográfiai Vállalat, -CM, page 83/II.. Lajbi Holla @ me 13:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Instead of correct maps you can find many text descriptions, even in English: just google for "Far Eastern Republic" together with "Kamchatka"! --Roksanna 18:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Find some and link it here. I promise I'll check them if there's notable and trusted info. Lajbi Holla @ me 19:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: All new paragraphs has been translated from German Wikipedia article (see signature date for page history status). Link is on the left hand panel of the article main. Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 14:38, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, right the first weblink which is mentioned in the article has a chapter about the admistrative divisions. There were five provinces mentioned, one of them was Kamchatka, a few sentences later is mentioned that Kamchatka was ceded to RSFSR end of 1920. So I was right when I told you the map is wrong and should include Kamchatka... or you have to mention in the map´s legend that those were the borders after Kamchatka was given to RSFSR in 1920. --Roksanna (talk) 21:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Has anyone know about its armed forces?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.73.225 (talk) 17:37, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Armed Forces
Talk:Abdul Rahman of Negeri Sembilan

message: The article currently claims that Abdul Rahman was born "Tunku Abdul Rahman".  My understanding is that Tunku is a variant spelling  of Tengku introduced by, well, Tunku Abdul Rahman.  There's been enough confusion between the two men already.  Can anybody provide evidence of this spelling at the time of his birth?  Groogle (talk) 07:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tunku?
Talk:Amadeo I of Spain

message: In Italian it is Amedeo, isn't it?
: It is. Amadeo is Spanish. 82.161.19.51 14:42, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Amedeo

message: I think is important to put that Amadeo is a descendant of King Philip II through his daughter Catherine Michaela and his grandson Thomas Francis, because this dynastic liaison with the legitimate Hapsburg House was instrumental in the choosing of Amadeus to be King of Spain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.209.83.77 (talk) 16:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descends from Philip II of Spain 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. There is no consensus to move the article to Amadeo I or King Amadeo, as the supporters and the opposers have strong arguments on both sides. The alternative proposal has not received much feedback and may need further discussion. Therefore, the article should remain at Amadeo I of Spain until a clear consensus emerges. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Amadeo I of Spain →  – Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:COMMONNAME. Векочел (talk) 03:58, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Spain has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Italy has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is no spelling difference in Italian or Spanish.  And this is English-language Wikipedia, meaning our English-speaking readers should not  be forced to guess which one Wikipedia editors arbitrarily decided to spell in Italian or Spanish or English. Multiple figures have the same damn name.  Clearly ambiguous and fails WP:NCROY. Walrasiad (talk) 02:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly not the same name. One has an E and one has an A. Your assertion that it is "clearly ambiguous" is inaccurate. There is no reason in guideline or evidence as to why this shouldn't be moved.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is exactly the same name. In texts, he is referred to as both Amadeus and Amadeo.  Wikipedia readers should not have to guess or know in advance the perverse taste of some Wikipedia editor who arbitrarily decided to nativize the spelling of one figure and not the other.  It is clearly ambiguous. Walrasiad (talk) 11:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 January 2024