Talk:Fire piston

message: Edward 11:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that. Klosterdev 14:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request photograph

message: I've removed a wildly oversimplifying (but also wrong) explanation of the heating effect that conflated temperature, momentum, and pressure, and linked to adiabatic process for those who are interested in the non-obvious details of why this actually works. -- The Anome 08:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physics of gases 

message: I removed this
"By using the right sort of tinder a pressure of only about 3 pounds-force per square inch (20 kPa) will allow the tool produce a glowing coal." I author may have ment 3 pounds force on the piston. Note this article specifies the fire piston has a compression ratio of 25 to 1. theis means we have 24 atmosphears thats somthing like 1260 psi guage pressure. 3 psi is not even remotly close.68.83.199.209 (talk) 23:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Error 

message: I've been able to find no evidence backing up the idea that the fire piston is of ancient origin. Pretty much all information I've been able to find online seems to derive from the Wyatt R. Knapp article linked by this article, which describes it as an "Ancient Firemaking Machine" in its title but describes nothing earlier than its invention by Europeans in the early 19th century, and their discovery of its use in Southeast Asia in the same century. I've been able to find no reports of either earlier historical record of the device and no reports of them being found in archaeological digs. So if someone has such evidence, please cite it. Otherwise we should strike the claim of it being of ancient origin. --Ericjs (talk) 21:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient origin: citation needed 

message: Henry Balfour in his article of 1907 — Balfour, Henry (1907) "The fire piston," Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution … , pp. 565–598. — states on p. 567 that in 1807 Richard Lorentz of England received patent 3007 for "an instrument for producing instantaneous fire".  And British patent documents confirm this:  Patents of Invention from March 2, 1617 to October 1, 1852, part 1 (London, England:  George Edward Eyre and William Spottiswoode, 1857), p. 389.  On p. 569 of Balfour's article, there is a sketch (Fig. 1) of Lorentz's fire piston:  it shows a narrow cylinder with a rod-like piston, which forces compressed air onto a lump of tinder.  Balfour even quotes, from the patent, a description of the operation of Lorentz's fire piston.
However, Paolo Brenni — Paolo Brenni, "Volta’s electric lighter and its improvements:  The birth, life and death of a peculiar scientific apparatus which became the first electric household appliance," Proceedings of a conference held in Pognana sul Lario, Italy during June 1–6, 2003. — on p. 12 of his article cites (and on p. 13 illustrates) the same patent, but describes a completely different fire starter.  Here, Lorentz's apparatus generated hydrogen gas, which was ignited by an electrophorus (an electrostatic device).  This is clearly not a fire piston. 
Due to this inconsistency, I'm removing Lorentz's patent as a reference.
VexorAbVikipædia (talk) 08:48, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for researching and clarifying this. It sounds like the Volta/Lorentz gas/electric device should be added to an article on cigarette lighters, instead of this article on fire pistons.  Reify-tech (talk) 12:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know how two careful scholars (Balfour and Brenni) could have looked at (supposedly) the same patent but then shown and described two completely different devices.  One of them must have made a mistake.  But until I can find Lorentz's original patent, I can't cite his patent as the first fire piston that was patented in 1807.  VexorAbVikipædia (talk) 01:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lorentz's fire piston of 1807 

message: This article contains errors regarding the distribution of the fire piston in Southeast Asia. From Henry Balfour's 1908 article "The fire piston", the places where it has been documented by specimens found in museum collections are: Burma, Laos, the Malay Peninsula, the Philippines, Sumatra, Borneo, Java, and Flores. To this we can also add Thailand based on specimens obtained by Walter Hough. Balfour also mentions that "John Cameron says, as quoted above, that prior to 1865 he saw the fire piston in use in some of the islands to the eastward of Java, so that we may assume that other islands in the neighborhood of Flores possessed the instrument at that time. Unfortunately, he does not specify the localities". Nonetheless on his accompanying map Balfour shaded in the islands of Bali, Lombok and Sumbawa as possessing the fire piston, apparently based on this communication.
As for Kalimantan, Kalimantan is the Indonesian portion of the island of Borneo. As long as Borneo is listed, it is superflous to also list Kalimantan. 
As for Sulawesi, I have not found any information that the fire piston was present here, and it should be removed until such time as a reference can be supplied.
As for the fire piston being present in southern India, I have read the article by M. D. Raghavan (July 1935. "The Fire-Piston in South India". Man. Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 35: 104–106. JSTOR 2790717). This article concerns 4 artifacts that were excavated from the ancient burial site as Adichanallur. If these were indeed fire pistons they would not only establish its distribution in southern India but also its antiquity (more than two thousand years ago). However it seems impossible that these are fire pistons. One requirement of a fire piston is a cylinder with a consistent bore, but Raghavan's specimens 2 and 3 "are wide at the top and narrowing at the bottom". A second requirement is a closely fitting piston but this is not true of any of them, and only one (specimen 3) has a rod that approaches being straight enough. Third, in true fire pistons, "the piston (or cylinder) has a handle on the end to allow a firm grip to be applied to it, or a large enough surface area to strike it sharply without causing pain" (per the Wiki article here). Again this is not true of any of the rods, in fact one of them is clearly pointed on top (ouch!). I will not speculate on what these implements were used for, but we can dismiss Raghavan's hypothesis that they were fire pistons.
As for Madagascar, if the fire piston were present here it would also prove its antiquity -- it would date the fire piston to the time of the Srivijayan maritime empire -- but I am not sure that the source is reliable, and definitely it is not the primary source. I would like to know, where did the author get their information that the fire piston is found on Madagascar? 
As for the Pacific Islands, this does not accord with any literature that I have read, it is not referenced, and it seems simply erroneous. 
Rlithoi (talk) 01:57, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographic spread of the fire piston in Southeast Asia 

message: This is a practical example where a rapid decrease in volume results in a rapid increase in both temperature and pressure. Not sure how the increases are partitioned (between temperature and pressure) but it sets things on fire. Whether the example goes here, or in adiabatic process with a reference back here is what I don't know.
Riventree (talk) 19:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example math needed: [[Adiabatic process]]