Talk:Economic regions of Egypt

message: copied from Turnopoems Talk page:
Again? Please do not delete entire sections of articles. Economics does apply.
    The Regions article, which list Regions for Physical Planning Purposes is not the First-Level or Second Level etc. Regions is for Physical Planning - two different things). Talk about bureaucracy! So, if you were to add Economic regions here, where would it go? (Regions doesn't go here). It doesn't apply to this list below: 
This article (again) is not about this: Subdivisions of Egypt
    First-level (governorate)
    Second-level (markaz, qism)
    Third-level (district, village)
    Fourth-level (sheyakha)
*I think the write-up under the Administrative Regions section in Regions of Egypt belongs in the Governorates of Egypt article (which I notice you've been working on a lot), maybe in a new section called "history" or "decentralization of power over the years". I've been wanting to move that "write-up" for awhile to "Governorates of Egypt" but I didn't want to step on your toes. It kind of gives a history of the decentralization of power over the years. So what do you think? Do you want that info to go into the Governorates page (I plan to delete it from Regions page) or is not not useful? 
*You didn't answer, you deleted it. I guess you didn't want the section. 
* On aside, beautiful resource you added on Sharqia! Maybe just add to the column Feddan "roughly equal to an acre" or change it to "Acres"
Level C (talk) 19:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: deleted entire section from Regions of Egypt

message: Regions of Egypt causes a lot of confusion because the Arabic page uses Regions of Egypt to mean "Administrative Subdivisions". I would like to rename the English article to Economic Regions of Egypt because this article is about the urban planning and economic conditions of Egypt's regional units.  Example of other country naming page Economic Regions of Russia Level C (talk) 19:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page renamed because it's caused days and days of confusion 

message: Let's have the discussion here, not on your talkpage.
I'm not sure how, but I get the feeling, these pages should be disconnected because they are discussing apples (Administrative Divisions) and oranges (Economic Regional Units). These articles are not discussing the same thing.
How to fix this?
*The Arabic _____ article   = English Economic Regions of Egypt
*The Arabic Regions article =  English Subdivisions of Egypt
What is subdivisions missing (in your mind)?  In my mind, after much research, Subdivisions of Egypt is not missing something called "Regions"... See statoids.com (for example)
The "regions" that you are probably referring to show up on the Governorates template. Level C (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Arabic page on Regions means something different than the Regions English page 

message: Started updating this page for Africa Destubathon
but another editor began making changes on it as well. 
but I did the bulk of the work and have been at odds with the changes being made by  which he doesn't summarize or discuss before making. I've done a lot of research before I made changes. He based his changes on the Arabic article which is linked to this one but is not EQUIVALENT in terms of its contents. Arabic and English wiki articles should be unlinked. They're not the same, apples and oranges.
 User:Level C|Level C]] (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I was not aware of this destubathon but as I clarified below, I don't intend to step on anyone's toes and I'm not interested in any prize. I will refrain from editing until the event is over but I will be active on the talk page. I also clarified on my talk page that the Arabic article linked to this one ISN'T the one I based my information on, as they are incorrectly linked. The correct Arabic article is found '. Turnopoems (talk) 20:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  for Africa Destubathon... 

message: I think the map looks good now that it's been resized. It was too large. Level C (talk) 02:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: "Top" importance? I don't think so. Will have to keep a lookout for what these regions / this government body actually does, meaning what functions does it really have "complete authority" and "control" over, what does it accomplish, what has it accomplished with sources? etc. Level C (talk) 00:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: Nobody comes to Wikipedia for a gallery of maps. It's not an atlas. That being said, why are all of these map pictures so large? Can somebody shrink them down and put them into their correct spots? The preview for the page just shows two pictures and no text. 75.6.197.115 (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps