Talk:2007 Philippine general election

message: Data on the candidates are verified? :) --Noypi380 02:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These are the ones at the SWS surveys, I think. (And I also think we should cut down on local contests, why not National Capital Region (Philippines) local elections, 2007 Metro Manila local elections, 2007 and Cebu local elections, 2007?) --Howard the Duck 07:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, dividing is okay too. :) --Noypi380 03:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We might as well removed copy-pasted news... --Howard the Duck 09:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

text: made new links in the page, lets start from there. :) --Noypi380 05:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only talking of the elections at the local level will not be as notable as nation-wide!  Besides, the results at the local level does not necessarily reflect the national results.   --Pinay06 (Talk•Email) 00:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Sorry, my statement above is true only for senators and congressman! --Pinay06 (Talk•Email) 02:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Jamalul Kiram is the SULTAN of Sulu not the SULTANATE of Sulu. He is a person, not a place, stupid! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.87.214 (talk • contribs) 
:Thank you for pointing that out. --Howard the Duck 16:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sultanate of Sulu? 

message: My question on the survey results table of Pulse Asia is that there is no total number of respondents written on the table, just 100%. Also, there is no  geographic location  as well as socio-demographics of respondents - stuff which are important information for valid statistical analysis, that is notability for inclusion in the article. --Pinay06 (Talk•Email) 00:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, it is harder to predict senators (since there are 12 -  spreading the votes thinner among them) than president and vice president. --Pinay06 (Talk•Email) 00:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Note: I found the source, and read the discussion, hence the table cannot be taken on its own, apart from the context. BTW, the current table needs to be changed or add Table 1 page 1  because that will show the actual Top 12. --Pinay06 (Talk•Email) 02:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Already added Table 1 that shows the Top 12 senatoriables...--Pinay06(Talk•Email) 15:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pulse Asia]] pre-election 

message: pls quit associating mike defensor with lakas as he is the chair of the LP-atienza wing,defensor should only be associated with LP and not with lakas 202.175.217.2 01:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Defensor resigned as LP and moved to Lakas-CMD please refer to his COC rizalnnoynapoleon 14:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Defensor

message: Do you agree that we should the Cayetano issue under NPOV since that matter is controversial --Rizalninoynapoleon 02:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The language used was neutral enough. How could it be tagged with ? You may have a wrong understanding on what the  tag is for. --Howard the Duck 01:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

text: My take: A controversial matter in itself is not NPOV. But if the topic was discussed using biased language, then that makes it NPOV. However, if my memory serves me right, there is a template that we can use to indicate that a certain topic or subject is controversial; the template's purpose is to warn members that debates and disputes about the topic are are to be expected. (I'll go and look it up). I found it! The templates that I'm referring to are for talk pages. It's  and .  --- Tito Pao 22:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cayetano issue is still debated at the Supreme Court especially since Alan filed for a disqualification and an election protest at the SC. Rizalninoynapoleon 03:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So what? --Howard the Duck 06:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joselito Cayetano 

message: Accdg. to the COMELEC, Goma is an independent and not from the NPC. --Howard the Duck 15:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Gomez 

message: Where are NAMFREL counts published. COMELEC website seems down most of the time and the only NAMFREL site I found is at http://namfrel.zamboanga.ph. --Soman 09:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Inquirer has them. --Howard the Duck 03:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAMFREL counts 

message: If anyone is planning to add either the COMELEC or NAMFREL results, be sure to add both the total votes (add all the votes) and the percentages. --Howard the Duck 09:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Party-list elections 

message: COMELEC has just proclaimed that Fr. Eddie Panlilio (YEHEY! To end jueteng in Pampanga) as the new Governor of Pampanga. Howard, Scorpion and Others today is a day to end corruption and poverty and i ask that Among Ed should have a page he deserves it. Don't you agree rizalninoy 18:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eddie Panlilio 

message: Howard please watch your language you can get blocked by the Wikipedia Administrators. No Offense. rizalninoy 21:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I responded sarcastically to the anon user. --Howard the Duck 14:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on Jamalul Kiram 

message: This article seems to have far too much information on it and is very much in a disarray. For a novice it is almost impossibly to understand at a glance who and which parties that where elected. --Jonte-- 11:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you think should be done? --Howard the Duck 11:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Making sub-pages for the senate and house results. And only present a summary of them on the first page, which should be at the top. --Jonte-- 12:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought that there were articles for Philippine Senate election, 2007 and Philippine House elections, 2007 but they got all redirected. The question is, there'll be 12 elected candidates; do we include all of them, or just say "Coalition A" got 6 candidates, "B" got 5 plus one independent? --Howard the Duck 12:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

text:  Well, usually there in a summary it only says which coalition, and then there can be more precise information about each elected candidate on a sub-page. I really don't have time to work on this article right now but I can give a helping hand later on. --Jonte-- 20:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far too much information 

message: While reading this article and translating parts to Dutch for the Dutch Wikipedia, I found an inconsistency. In the section about the Genuine Opposition it is stated that Manny Villar is a candidate running under the flag of GO, but remains independent. But when I go to the acticle about Genuine Opposition it is stated that Manny Villar is member of the Nacionalista Party. One the these two statements must be incorrect. Magalhães 12:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps candidate Panfilo Lacson is meant, in the section about Genuine Opposition? Magalhães 12:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The NP is under the GO coalition. --Howard the Duck 14:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but that is my point. If he is a member of NP, than he cannot be independent (as stated in the article). I thought independent means that you are not member of a political party. Magalhães 08:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That escaped me, maybe it was meant to say that Villar wasn't supposed to within the GO coalition (hence independent from the GO? Early in the campaign Villar and Panginilan were thinking about leaving the coalition; only Sharon's husband left. --Howard the Duck 09:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manny Villar 

message: The article on Koalisyon ng mga Pulitikong na Maka-administrasyon was deleted because there's no proof of its existence. So how do we resolve the fact that it's still listed here in the election article? Can the whole house election results be verified? --seav 10:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted party article 

message: We should divide the articles in all elections (Presidential and other articles) Rizalninoynapoleon (talk) 06:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out the very first discussion on this page. --Howard the Duck 11:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to divide the article into Local, Gubernatorial, Senate, House, Presidential and Parliamentary 

message: The image :Image:GenuineOpposition logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:      Image:TeamUnity logo.gif
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:GenuineOpposition logo.png