lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SIGMO

message: I have tagged the article with cleanup-importance/context because the article has not explained what is special about this humanoid robot.  There are many kinds of humanoid robot, should we list them all?  In addition, IMHO, the article should give some background on who makes the robot and whether it is completed etc...--Hurricane111 00:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup-importance/context
Talk:Pattern 1914 Enfield

message: work in progress--TGC55 00:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 20:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I don't know how this rumour gor started, but the .276 was nothing like the Ross. 
"It has often been stated that the .276 Enfield, the cartridge for which the British Pattern 1913 rifle was designed, was similar to or identical with the .280 Ross. That statement has appeared in print and has been blindly repeated over the years. But it is not true. 
The .280 Ross is a long, tapered, cartridge, with a case length of 2.59" and a cartridge overall length of 3.5". The .276 Enfield has a case length of 2.35" and a COL of 3.23", shorter than the .30-'06, and only about 0.17" longer than the .303 British. 
While the English designers may have wanted to duplicate or exceed the ballistics of the .280 Ross, they did not use the same cartridge, or even one "similar". 
Where the .276 Enfield is distinctly different from the .303 is its base diameter. It has a rebated rim, with a base diameter of .525" and a rim diameter of .515". So it is not a long cartridge, but is a fat one, though not as fat at the base as the .280 Ross."
Here's the .Ross (with a .303): 75px
I can't find a picture of the .276 Enfield, but the .280 British of the Forties was very similar:
::Ok, not hearing any dissent I'm deleting the Rioss reference.Solicitr (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Incidentally, there is a photo of the .276 Enfield on the Spanish language site Municion.org: http://www.municion.org/7mm/276Enfield.htm --172.190.63.65 (talk) 01:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based on the Ross? 

message: The article mentions (and most others on-line that I've seen agree) that the P14 was used primarily as a sniper rifle during the First World War. However, Martin Pegler in Out Of Nowhere mentions that the definitive sniper variant, the Pattern 1914 1*W (T) didn't reach the front in time to see much actual use, if any at all. I am, therefore, left wondering whether or not the P14 saw any service at all as a sniper rifle during the Great War, every internet "source" on the P14 notwithstanding. Is it possible, perhaps, that "unofficial" sniper versions of the P14 were used prior to the belated introduction of the 1*W (T)?--63.3.21.1 (talk) 21:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sniping and the Great War
Talk:Action Programme (1968)

message: The programme was called "Akční program KSČ", translated as "Action Programme", but perhaps "April programme" is known internationally, I have no idea. The programme was officially announced in April 5, 1968.
The article also doesn't mention that the programme was already obsoleted by flow of events when it was created.
See e.g.  (in Czech). Pavel Vozenilek 00:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pattern 1913 Enfield

message: work in progress--TGC55 00:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know it was the first, but it was certainly about the first to see widespread service (in its P '14 and M1917 incarnations).  In the US at least it was influential enough that the M1903A3 Springfield, M1928/M1 Thompson, M1 Garand and M1 Carbine all adopted receiver peeps (albeit of tangent type, rather than leaf).--Solicitr (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

message: Does it make sense to have separate articles for the P'13 and P'14, which were effectively identical but for chambering?  The P'13's only real significance is that it wound up being the prototype for the .303 version. Solicitr (talk) 16:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge articles?
Talk:New Death (Discworld)

message: "...he is a larger figure than Bill Door and has only smoke underneath his robe, rather than bones. His horse, though, is the classic skeletal steed, as opposed to Binky. In place of a face or skull, the new Death wears a crown".
Wouldn't this description be accurate for both the New Death and also the Witch-king of Angmar?  Is the description perhaps a Lord of the Rings reference?
Zoe.r 00:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Criticisms of Mega Churches

message: I would not like to see this section deleted but would like to see it expanded upon and articulated clearly and concisely. The truth about what many of these mega so called pastors and teachers and their mega organizations are doing NEED to be held accountable for TRUTH TELLING and if they are not, then they need to be soundly rebuked and reproved and thoroughly exposed for what they are doing. Many organizations like the Seeker Sensitive/Church Growth/Purpose Driven® methods are ripping people off!!! It is tragic that they have been able to get away with it for so many years. It seems like the secular media are the only ones to expose the frauds in much of the so called church especially in the mega bucks business in the church!!! All their good works in all the world will not help them escape the wrath of God on Judgment Day because of Scripture Twisting and false teachings. Fides Viva 11:05, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't like the megachurch movement either, but Wikipedia is not a place to hold churches or pastors or anything else accountable for their actions. Check out Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (specifically the bit about "soapbox"). I'm not saying necessarily that it needs to be deleted, but the sentiments above won't get you far in making your case. Staecker 13:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

text: One way that you can "strike back" at articles that you feel are unfair advertisements for certain megachurces is to tag them as not following Wikipedia's NPOV standards; however, if you do not also voice your concern rationally on the discussion page of these articles, the POV tag will quickly be removed..  Also, there are lots of links at the bottom of this page, surely you can cultivate a more coherent criticism from all of those.  One does not need to be journalistic to create Wikipedia articles...if you make an article with simple, uncomplicated sentences then the community will eventually morph them into a higher standard. JD79 03:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of this Section
Talk:Alfred Sturtevant

message: I remember reading about a unit called a "sturt", named for Sturtevant, which is similar to a morgan but measures distances in embryos. It was in a Scientific American article about fruit flies, and they found the point where a gene is expressed by making a two-cell embryo with the gene and a marker gene expressed in one cell, letting it grow, and finding the probability that only one of the two genes is expressed in the fly. Can someone else verify this? -phma 01:02, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Found one: http://www.uni-kl.de/FB-Biologie/AG-Cullum/Teaching/Files/Gen1Lec3.pdf -phma 00:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

text: There's now an article Sturt (Biology) but it is so far just a link to the wiktionary definition. RJFJR (talk) 14:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Moved to talk because it is just a list (almost of trivia) that should be gone over and important items integrated into the article rather than left as a badly formatted list.  RJFJR (talk) 14:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other noteworthy contributions of Sturtevant

message: The text contains a reference to "segregating genes", which is a concept I see thrown about without having found a good definition of.  Is it the same as "segregating alleles"?  Maybe that link could be added in that case.
83.241.192.2 (talk) 08:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Segregating genes? 
Talk:Nectar source

message: The old article has been moved to Northern Nectar Sources for Honeybees. SB Johnny 14:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) 08:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Improved 

message: I haven't found any yet, aside from the one which previously inhabited this article (moved... see above). I'm hoping to start one for the mid-atlantic region, though such a list would end up being awfully long. I'm not a beekeeper, though... perhaps bee-nectar sources should be listed on separate lists. I know at least some common nectar sources are quite toxic. SB Johnny 14:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Lists? 
Talk:Warren Wald

message: I have added more references. Hyperlinks still need to be added to other wikipedia pages. Link to TV rage not allowed as reference - to be added if allowed in the future - it shows appearances of Warren in various Pop Idol finals --82.0.172.18 (talk) 22:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've put this page up for speedy deletion as he doesn't satisfy any of wikipedia's criteria for articles on entertainers:
    * With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.
    * Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
    * Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
82.39.185.200 23:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete - non-notable. — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 19:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Keep - Although he doesn't fulfil the first and last criteria he certainly has a "cult" following. He has links all over the internet including on National Newspapers and cult websites. The video of him singing has been posted multiple times on file sharing sites including YouTube and is incredibly popular. Whether he comes under the heading of entertainer at all is debateable - he is a reality TV star rather than a singer. --82.0.172.18 20:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Military history of African Americans

message: Weird that the World War II section seem to be almost hijacked with an attempt to Glorify the very few African-american women who served "48 as nurse", compared to the extreme majority of African-american men.  
the military only allowed men to server in combat, with rare exception for female nurse.
Also the women's corp is not the military.
This needs clean up.  I'm going to remove some items I feel are not related to actually Military Service. Feel free to undo, but please leave a reason why if you like.
 2603:3020:707:4500:5887:E4BA:FCCD:6A5 (talk) 20:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War II Section - Black Feminist Revisionist Hi-Jacking 

message: The aspects of the article that needs to be developed. The sections that I will improve is Medal of Honor recipients, Integration of the armed forces, World War II and Military history of African Americans in popular culture. One sections that should be improved is they should list the most important individuals that payed the most important part in  making black soldiers an actual thing. Another thing they should change is they should go more in detail on that blacks company's or units that contributed the most in every war. They should talk about how these black solders where eventually awarded for there service. Lastly talk about how black soldiers still go throw racism even though they where aloud to sever in the military. --Jerome Davis jr (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The idea of racism in the armed forced in WW2 is certainly overlooked and I believe there should be more of a point here. I could possibly develop this further as I currently study this? I could further develop this by suggesting about the ideas of black soldiers at home and for example talk about the Stuttgart Incident. Goldenl03 (talk) 18:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal of Honor recipients, Integration of the armed forces, World War II 

message: The statement "A total of 708 African Americans were killed in combat during World War II" cannot be correct.  The 92nd Division alone lost about 750 men killed and missing, and some of the artillery battalions at Bastogne took very heavy casualties. Likewise every US Navy ship that went down or was seriously damaged took African American lives with it. Sciacchitano (talk) 14:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties WWII 

message: — Assignment last updated by Thetyronezone (talk) 00:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: This is America
Talk:Thyroglobulin

message: Needs a picture.  Actually, may not need to be here at all.
An article on storage proteins, or Iodine metabolism might be more useful.
Should the small number of Tyrosyl residues mentioned in the introduction be <20 rather than >20?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.156.157.91 (talk) 18:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Endocrine Rev doi:10.1210/er.2015-1090 JFW | T@lk 12:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: The following anatomical image is moved here to Talk, as it lacks a legend, its labels are not mentioned in the text, and when the text addresses anatomical matters, it uses different terms distinct from those appearing in the image labels. Hence, even to a well-educated reader, reading the text and image in the context of one another is confusing. On return of the image to the article, please rectify the issues with regard to stand-alone understandability, and also create a ... entry citing Gray et al 1918 available at the image entry at Wikimedia Commons (since being out of copyright does not, in honest academic work—see —allow use of material without attribution/recognition of source. Cheers. Le Prof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leprof 7272 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Image moved here temporarily
Talk:Hudson v. McMillian

message: I freakin' dare someone to defend Thomas' and Scalia's ruling in thin case.  -Mark
Since it was a dissent, it doesn't count as a ruling. What I do find funny is that, by quoting Frank Easterbrook's memorable line, he managed to get Space: 1999 into the U.S. Supreme Court Reports — a privilege denied to Star Trek and Star Wars AFAIK. Daniel Case 05:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sturmgrenadier (2nd nomination)

message: Hi,
Just a reminder that AfD is not a vote. It looks like one, it has a lot in common with one, but it isn't a vote. It's an attempt to achieve a consensus decision, or failing that, to measure community feeling.  That's why the opinions of newcomers and outsiders don't always get considered - sometimes they clearly aren't representitive of the wider wikipedian community. The closing admin uses the page to make a decision, which can be reviewed if necessary. The raw numbers are a major part, even the major part of it, but it's not a vote. 
Regards, Ben Aveling 02:00, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Apahida necropolis

message: Should the red-link for Romanian Museum of History actually be the National Museum of Romanian History? I guessing it's the same thing, but am reluctant to change as I couldn't verify it... -- JLaTondre 02:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Museum Name
Talk:William Mann

message: Writing another bio, went to link mann.  Discovered a mess.  Left a mess but hopefully a more informative one.  If only i knew how to set up one of those disambiguation thingees.... or anything much about the Manns (Men?).
:Thank you for bringing this to my attention; I've made it into a proper disambiguation page now. No new information, unfortunately; I don't know anything about any of them. Eugene van der Pijll 09:57, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Teachings of Pope John Paul II

message: I don't really see the difference between this and the teachings section in the main Pope John Paul II article.--Miked84 02:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Branch target predictor

message: Branch target prediction is a big deal for bytecode interpreters - two good papers to read are:
Accurate Indirect Branch Prediction, by Driesen and Hölzle, 1992
The Behavior of Efficient Virtual Machine Interpreters on Modern Architectures, by Ertl and Gregg, 2001
--CTho 02:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  importance for interpreters
Talk:Konstantin Dejanović

message: Looking at the history of this article, it seems there's been a protracted disagreement over the gender(s) and name(s) of Constantine's offspring.  I don't suppose anyone has a source they can cite?  Or is this something where there's no definitive historical record, but two competing hypotheses?  The Literate Engineer 02:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Son or Daughter

message: *Konstantin Dejanović 78 results (+Константин Дејановић 81 results, Дејановић Константин 16 results)
*Konstantin Dejanov 3 results (+Константин Дејанов 6 results)
*Konstantin Dragaš 98 results (+Константин Драгаш 78 results, Драгаш Константин 39)
*Konstantin Dragash 15 results
*Constantine Dragaš 54 results (Dragaš Constantine 21 results)
*Constantine Dragash 30 results (Dragash Constantine 2 results)
*Constantine Dejanović 31 results (Dejanović Constantine 12 results)
*Scholar: Konstantin Dragaš 24; Constantine Dragaš 18; Konstantin Dejanović 15; Constantine Dragash 7;
My conclusion is that Konstantin Dragaš is the most suitable name.--Zoupan 06:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, well, "Konstantin Dragaš" includes also many Serbo-Croatian, German and French articles, and if you count the Dragaš/Dragash varieties together, the difference is rather non-existent. It seems to me that in English, and given the English habit of anglicizing the first name, "Constantine" remains the best option. Constantine   ✍  16:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Information from the Turkish historian Hoca Sadeddin Efendi (1) in his chronicle Crown of Histories about the Bulgarian character of North Macedonia at the time of Constantine Deyan (2) 17th c.
Indeed, the Kyustendil ruler, known by the name of Constantine and famous for possessing extensive lands and spahis (warriors - editor's note), was the supreme ruler in the Bulgarian region and was in possession of the lands in which the Tala and Nakra mines were situated ...
 
(Yordan Ivanov (literary historian), The Bulgarians in Macedonia), Sofia, 1917, p. 162; the original is in Turkish
1. The author of travel notes
2. Constantine Deyan, ruler of the Velbuzhd principality in south-western Bulgaria, who became a Turkish vassal and died in 1394 in the war against the Wallachian chieftain Mircea I of Wallachia. Angel Angel 2 (talk) 02:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The mother of Konstantin Dragash was Teodora-Evdokija, daughter of King Stefan Dečanski of Serbia by his second wife, Maria Palaiologina. His father was magnate Dejan from Kumanovo region, who served Emperor Stefan Dušan as sevastokrator, and Emperor Uroš V (r. 1355–71) as despot. How did Konstantin Dragash become a Bulgarian? You will have to rewrite a hundred articles.--Nicoljaus (talk) 08:29, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drink water from the well - for "Serbian ruler" [[Konstantin Dragash]]
Talk:Catlettsburg, Kentucky

message: The Charles Manson article says his birthplace was Cincinnati. Which is correct? Malepheasant 02:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to http://www.city-data.com/city/Cincinnati-Ohio.html and also Answers.com he was born in Cincinnati. The Manson article was probably enough to delete this though. Good catch.-Crunchy Numbers 04:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles Manson birthplace?

message: A post office was opened at this location in 1808 as Mouth of Sandy, Ky., but the community was laid
 out as a town in 1849 by civil engineer James C. Fry. It was incorporated as a city in 1858 as
 Catlett's Burgh, named after local landowner Horatio Catlett.
How could it have been laid out as a town in 1949 and incorporated in 1858? Actually the sentence implies that the post office was laid out as a town.-Crunchy Numbers 03:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  problem sentence 
Talk:Dharan

message: Hii 49.126.170.30 (talk) 02:00, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nepali jneneme
Talk:Bandwidth test

message: This topic doesn't seem to warrent an article. As it currently stands, wiktionary seems more appropriate.
Puglas 02:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

message: A list of software for bandwidth test has been removed from the article. Why? :Wikipedia:Spam says that "differentiation should be made between spam articles and legitimate articles about commercial entities". Is it okay to put these back? Mange01 23:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read our policy about what Wikipedia is not, particularly the section that states that Wikipedia is not a collection of external links. The list above is a list of commercial providers. The only links that should be included in the External links section are articles that tell the reader more about what a bandwidth test is and maybe one link to a repository of links to providers like DMOZ. Thanks, Gwernol 23:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is spam? 

message: * TPtest , which is developed on initiative by Swedish authorities, and measures the UDP and TCP maximum throughput from a central reference test server in Sweden to the user computer.
* TPspeed  which includes a client similar to TPtest, and a reference test server.
* Netfor2 RxTX , which measures the maximum throughput by simultaneously transferring files between the computer and multiple web servers.
* IPNet Tuner , which can measure the link data rate with any destination IP adress, for example the nearest router.
* Du Meter  which is logging the throughput (but not necessarily maximum throughput)
*BBMonitor Bandwidth speed test software.
*IPTab Bandwidthtest Accurate Bandwidth Upload and Download speed test.
*Speakeasy Download and upload speed test. Simple, no hassle.
*MySpeed Bandwidth Test Download and upload broadband speed test. May be down.
*Bandwidth Tests Download and upload broadband speed test
*InternetFrog JavaScript Speed Test Download and upload broadband speed test
*www.evaluationengineering.com Making Accurate Bandwidth Measurements
*Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Available Bandwidth Measuring and Sampling
*VivilProject SpeedTest A multi-thread Windows speed test software (last about 15 minutes but give real result even with 20Mbit/s DSL lines...)
*Toast Internet Speed Test Download and upload tests. Combination of text and/or image downloads. Simple, no hassle.
*Testmy.netBroadband speed test and broadband community
*Verizon speedtest
*Internet Speed Test Tool  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob Worton (talk • contribs) 09:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read our policy about what Wikipedia is not, particularly the section that states that Wikipedia is not a collection of external links. The list above is a list of commercial providers. The only links that should be included in the External links section are articles that tell the reader more about what a bandwidth test is and maybe one link to a repository of links to providers like DMOZ. Thanks, Gwernol 23:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software for maximum throughput measurements