Talk:Candy Mossler

message: I've tried to reorganize the material to put it in chronology, but the dates don't make sense. In one place it seem to say the victim was killed in 1966, whereas Candy Mossler was charged with the crime in 1965. Stay tuned. Famspear 20:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates don't make sense

message: the last reference is a dead link and leads to an OBIT of keith haring.  I cant delete it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.226.20.130 (talk) 01:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Last link in in error

message: Parts of this article are the same, word for word as the crimelibrary.com article, which you can find using the only external link listed. The link will take you to chapter 8. This article is just the rearrangement of paragraphs from chapter 8 with a few new words sprinkled here and there. Why bother writing an article if you're just going to lift it from somewhere else? Just provide a link and send readers there. At least they'll get a more accurate timeline of events. Here's an example:
THIS ARTICLE:
Police officers turned up four witnesses who claimed the lovers solicited a hit on "the old mooch." The investigators lined up a long list of witnesses—neighbors, employees, hotel clerks—who said they saw Mel and Candy share affectionate moments. Cops found a photographic record of Candy and Mel's travels—souvenir snapshots from nightclubs, ski slopes, concerts.
CRIMELIBRARY.COM: 
Cops turned up four witnesses who claimed the lovers solicited a hit on the old mooch. The investigators lined up a long list of witnesses, neighbors, employees, hotel clerks- who said they saw Mel and Candy share affectionate moments. Cops found a photographic record of Candy and Mels travels- souvenir snapshots from nightclubs, ski slopes, concerts.
THIS ARTICLE:
America s newspapers and magazines took note of the salacious case, and a drumbeat began to build for indictment of Candace Mossler. It finally came on July 20, 1965.
CRIMELIBRARY.COM:
America s newspapers and magazines took note of the salacious case, and a drumbeat began to build for indictment of Candace Mossler. It finally came on July 20, 1965.
THIS ARTICLE:
Candy Mossler had flown to Rochester prior to her arrest in order to undergo treatment at the Mayo Clinic for migraines, but agreed to fly to Miami to surrender, rather than risk the indignity of a surprise arrest. Accompanied by a private nurse and wearing a Mayo Clinic wrist identification band, she flew from Minnesota to Miami International Airport, where she was treated to a genteel arrest by a state police commander. A mighty press contingent had gathered at the airport, and Candy gave them plenty of her toothpaste-model smiles. When reporters confronted her with allegations of adultery, incest, and murder, she simply replied, "Well, nobody's perfect."
CRIMELIBRARY.COM:
She was still living in Rochester but agreed to fly to Miami to surrender, rather than risk the indignity of a surprise arrest. Accompanied by a private nurse and wearing a Mayo Clinic wrist identification band, she flew from Minnesota to Miami International Airport, where she was treated to a genteel arrest by a state police commander. A mighty press contingent had gathered at the airport, and Candy gave them plenty of her toothpaste-model smiles. "I cant believe this is happening to me," she said through gleaming incisors. Turning to the lawmen, she added, "What you should be doing is finding the man who really did this murder. That is what the Dade County taxpayers are paying you for."
Rearranging things confuses the timeline too. She rented the apartments in Minnesota BEFORE her arrest. This article makes it seem like she rented
them in Florida AFTER her arrest. 
Stephlet  23:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You can flag the plagiarised text, prase by phrase with the copyright violation cleanup tag, whole sections or pages with the close paraphrasing template or check for similarities with the tools linked to the copypaste template. It is still a copyright violation even if the website has been taken down and archived because the writing is not the Wikipedia editor's original words. Besides, writing for Wikipedia needs to use an encyclopedic tone and style, so the text from most other sources will need to be rewritten to follow the appropriate tone and style anyway. Just copying from somewhere else makes for a poor quality article, which this one is. - 203.96.84.33 (talk) 01:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What constitutes plagiarism?   

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Candy Mossler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121019002134/http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/family/jacques_mossler/4.html to http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/family/jacques_mossler/4.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20070409152450/http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/family/jacques_mossler/9.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed