Talk:Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!

message: Our name is spelled Kaun, which is the more common and correct transliteration, but the film title seems to be spelled Koun. We should probably move the article to the Koun spelling to stay consistent. I'll do that if there are no objections. - Taxman Talk 16:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dixit precedes Khan in the intro credits. We follow the credits order. Kailash29792 (talk)  07:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name? 

message: no consensus to move. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 23:54, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hum Aapke Hain Kaun...! → Hum Aapke Hain Koun...! — Correct title is Hum Aapke Hain Koun...! So...... Hum Aapke Hain Kaun...! should redirect to Hum Aapke Hain Koun...! rather than present situation which is reverse... — Cruz-iglesia (talk) 20:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: Was this song inserted in the film after the premier? I think i have heard something like that, that this song was added later on. I dont have any reliable sources though. If someone finds it, do add it. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chocolate Limejuice 

message: Dixit should be before Khan because that is the official order in the credits of the film itself.  See here. BollyJeff | talk 17:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess user Syed alters the credits not to follow the rules, but to satisfy himself and millions of similar-minded egoistic fans of Salman by glorifying the actor. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Salman is doing just fine; he doesn't need their help. BollyJeff | talk 18:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can I get some help here? We have another one going. BollyJeff | talk 18:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of credits 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=304&catName=TGlmZXRpbWUgQWRqdXN0ZWQ%3D
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=350&catName=QmlnZ2VzdCBCbG9ja2J1c3RlcnMgRXZlcg%3D%3D
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=313&catName=TGlmZXRpbWUgQWRqdXN0ZWQ%3D
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140429080308/http://recipeguide.indiatimes.com/awards2001/ex_screenplay.htm to http://recipeguide.indiatimes.com/awards2001/ex_screenplay.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140313025522/http://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/brunch-stories/animal-kingdom/article1-816328.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/brunch-stories/animal-kingdom/article1-816328.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140321174935/http://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/brunch-stories/movie-magic/article1-836983.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/brunch-stories/movie-magic/article1-836983.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140311054035/http://www.frameworkonline.com/Issue42/42vv.html to http://www.frameworkonline.com/Issue42/42vv.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hey there, I notice that you made some changes to the financials here a couple of weeks ago. I don't think Limca would really qualify as a reliable source. I don't see any substantive discussion about it at WP:RSN, but there's no presumption that they do any actual verification, unless you know something that I do not, which is possible. Given that sources like Box Office India have gross estimates far lower than the 200 crore claim that we see here at India Today for instance, I think there's a legitimate question as to where this 200 crore figure comes from--was this box office sales, or did this also include other revenue streams like rentals and consumer media sales. At worst, the figures should probably be presented in the form of a range, since there is no definitive agreement on the figures, or at least not per the sources I was looking at. Thoughts? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. It's not just Limca Book of Records, but the 200 crore figure is also backed up by India Today and Guinness World Records, which gives $63.8 million (nearly 200 crore at 1994 exchange rates). The Film Journal also gives an estimate above 200 crore. That's four different sources giving around 200 crore. The only source which gives a significantly lower number is Box Office India, which appears to be the anomaly here. Maestro2016 (talk) 19:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Gotcha. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Financial data 

message: I think name of Salman khan should before Madhuri Dixit Nene because he get more screen timing in this movie than Madhuri Dixit,he share a lot of screen timing with renuka Sharma,alok nath,Manish Behl and many more cast 2409:4063:4CA3:E1DE:0:0:5009:6210 (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: From what I've seen while looking into this, she has top billing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As per the actual film credits, order looks fine.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 06:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2021