lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Benperidol

message: "It is an antipsychotic, which can be used for the treatment of schizophrenia[2], but it is primarily used to control deviant, antisocial hypersexual behaviour[3], and is sometimes prescribed to sex offenders as a condition of their parole, as an alternative to anti-androgen drugs such as cyproterone.[4]"
In Germany, benperidol (Glianimon and generics) is used mainly as a highly potent antipsychotic in severely psychotic and manic (e.g. schizophrenia, almost exclusively in acute pharmacological intervention) patients, though not nearly as often as haloperidol and 2nd generation antipsychotics. No specific use in antisocial hypersexual behaviour (or, not more than other neuroleptics/antipsychotics) occurs; this drug is quite infamous among psychiatric patients and personal to be the ultimative, "superpotent" neuroleptic with massive EPMS side-effects.
Is it used in the UK really as the "antipsychotic of choice" for sexual deviants, as could be assumed from the publications quoted?
Also, the "dichotomisation of choice" of pharmacotherapy between an antiandrogen or an antipsychotic seems not really close to practical therapy routine; cyproterone treatment is quite often co-administred with psychopharmaceutical medication and non-pharmaceutical treatment options... But these are just my impressions and thoughts...--Spiperon 12:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it even works in any sort of way that the person taking it finds helpful. On the other hand, its probably really easy to escape from a rapist doing the Thorazine Shuffle... Zaphraud (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses of benperidol.
Talk:John the Deacon (Venetian chronicler)

message: this article is entirely plagiarized, word-for-word, from the Catholic Church's New Advent encyclopedia... http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08491a.htm...  Stevenmitchell (talk) 10:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is plagiarized 
Talk:Johnny Paul Penry

message: Should this one be removed from the list of mentally retarded persons? According to the article, the prisoner has stated that did not meet the requirements in Texas law. In addition, there is no evidence stated apart from the lawyer's claim.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.221.250 (talk) 06:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The the first sentence of the entry for Johnny Paul Penry provides that he "is a Texas prisoner serving three consecutive sentences of life imprisonment without parole for rape and murder." This is not factually accurate. Penry is eligible for parole. See the Texas Department of Criminal Justice page
https://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=01900825
It provides that Penry will be eligible for parole on 2028-02-15. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice is the ultimate and definitive source for whether or not Penry is eligible for parole. 
Yes, the trial judge sentenced Penry to three consecutive sentences of life without parole, but the trial judge didn't have that lawful authority. Life without Parole didn't start in Texas until June 17, 2005. Penry's crimes took place in 1977, 1979 and and 1980. Life without Parole in Texas is based on when the crime occurred, not when the sentence was issued. 
Ward Larkin
WardLarkin (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnny Paul Penry has a Life Sentence with the possibility of Parole
Talk:Adolphe Boucard

message: Suggest just uploading a non-free photo of him - anything on the net should do. Richard001 (talk) 07:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there doesn't appear to be anything on the net. Might be difficult then. Richard001 (talk) 08:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Jioji Kotobalavu

message: I have just made some slight amendments to clarify Mr Kotobalavu's role in the Prime Minister's office as well as to put more light on the Agriculture scam that the Qarase government was alleged to have carried out. All investigations pointed at the Permanent Secretary, Peniasi Kunatuba and other officers at the HQ Min of Agriculture of being the guilty parties in the controversial agricultural scam from which they benefited personally. It appears that history will be kind to Mr Kotobalavu since he has been proven right on all counts. 
Sditoka (talk) 02:09, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jonah ibn Janah

message: As it stands today, this looks awful. It is full of abbreviations and almost no punctuation. It is hard to read. Is it someone's lecture notes? Did someone scan it with OCR and then failed to proofread it? It even has four paragraphs at the end which are not in English -- I guess it is Spanish; if so, it belongs in Spanish Wikipedia, not English Wikipedia.
So I looked at the History page, and compared the current version (last changed in November 2010) to a previous version (October 2010). It appears that this writer removed all the double brackets signifying wikilinks, removed all the braces signifying templates, removed most of the punctuation, but left the text of the wikilinks and templates. Don't people use the Preview button any more? Or was this the work of some malicious bot?
They also removed the Hebrew and Arabic versions of the subject's name. I think the originals of translitrated names are helpful to those readers who can read them. (It would be even better if the vowel points were added, if these are known.)
And then they added a Spanish translation, which does not belong here.
In a few days, I may revert. Any objections?  --- Solo Owl (talk) 00:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Worst Wikipedia page I have tried to read

message: In this diff, I replaced a paragraph that suggested that ibn Janah became unpopular due to shift to Ashkenazi scholarship which did not read Arabic, to another that describe him as being popularized even outside the Arabic-speaking world. It is true that the Scherman source suggested the unpopularity as suggested by the prev version of this paragraph, but Brisman and Martínez-Delgado both argued the opposite. Translations and the migration by Spanish-Jewish scholars to the rest of Europe made ibn Janah's works universally popular. Since these two sources  are (1) newer, (2) written by more academic writers, (3) published by more scholarly publishers, and (4) 2 > 1, I think we should follow them over Scherman. HaEr48 (talk) 07:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unpopularity or popularity?
Talk:Adrian Stokes (critic)

message: This article is flagged "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject". No doubt, if this contributor is a relative of the subject, he or she should have declared their interest. However, examination of the edits concerned shows that they are all of a very minor kind (the addition of a publication date, a wikilink, a change of spelling, etc.) No substantive material has been added or removed by this contributor. For this reason I suggest that it would be justifiable to remove the flag. Kanjuzi (talk) 17:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed & done. Johnbod (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary flag? 

message: I removed the reference to his poetry in the lede, since there is not a word about it in the article, except one book-title out of a long list. How does this page qualify for a Poetry Portal? Valetude (talk) 18:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poetry portal?
Talk:Jonathan ben Uzziel

message: The article didn't mention when he lived, so I added something based on the fact he was a student of Hillel the Elder. Woscafrench (talk) 09:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time alive 
Talk:QWERTY (song)

message: Why would you wanna remove this article? What is wrong with it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.49.14.9 (talk) 01:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QWERTY (song) (2nd nomination).  Someguy1221 01:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

message: on you tube theres a QWERTY music video by linkin park.is this worth mentioning??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wayside 10 (talk • contribs) 05:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  video 

message: This article is easily notable. Perhaps as notable as the Linkin Park singles. It describes the history of the song, the popularity of it, the reaction to it, much other information on it...Whatever. If anyone has information on this song, please post it!! I can probably find a reference for it. Thanks.
Tezkag72 (talk) 17:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a single. Fails notability guidelines. Rehevkor ✉ 17:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable
Talk:Jonathan Freeman-Attwood

message: This version of this article was a copy of the test found at the Royal Academy's website (). I have revered the article several times to the version with no text from the website (that is protected by copyright law). A few days ago an unregistered user () reverted again the changes to the copyrighted version and explained that "the revision was made because of suspected copyright violation. But the Royal Academy of Music has authorised reproduction of this text, which is more accurate". I don't see anything in the RAM's website indicating that they do grant free use of the material found on their website. Please discuss here.--Karljoos (talk) 11:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: This whole thing barely rates as a biography, apparently starting half though the subject's life. It could more appropriately be called a discography. When was he born? where was he born? what was his educational background? We have huge amounts of quite unnecessary detail about the musical recordings but little of the man. Richard Avery (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? biography 
Talk:Adrienne von Speyr

message: Lots of stuff needs to be verified. E.g. "she was the first female physician in Switzerland" -- In Switzerland, women were allowed to study medicine since around 1870. Female doctors had successful practices before 1900. Thus, Speyr cannot be the first one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.188.230.28 (talk) 17:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong or unclear statements 
Talk:Aemilius Jarvis

message: The claim that Jarvis "built the King Edward Hotel" is unsupported. In <ref>Edward James Lennox: Builder of Toronto,<ref> 1995, Marilyn M. Litvak notes: "Legend has it that the idea of building a premier hotel at the corner of King and Victoria streets originated in the 1890s with Edward Aemilius Jarvis..." But by 1898 when the Toronto Hotel Company was formed (incorporated 1899), Jarvis was not listed among the directors cited in the <ref>Mail and Empire, May 16, 1899<ref>.
Greenfielddude (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aemilius Jarvis and the King Edward Hotel
Talk:Jonathan Jones (journalist)

message: Material moved from main page
Jonathan Jones wrote a piece for The Guardian on January 5th 2006 called Rocks of Ages on the artist Richard Long which he wrote after seeing an exhibition of Richard Long's in London, then walking in the hills just behind Prestatyn in North Wales. He writes, or meditates of walking in that timeless landscape and how Richard Long also walks in remote parts of the world.
Viperoz 23:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed and altered a bunch of material, largely due to WP:BLP. There was a considerable amount of unsourced or poorly sourced information about the subject here, much of it negative. I've also removed some apparently unnecessary quotes and paraphrased others, and tried to give a better sense of the point of the sources given. Honestly, I'm not seeing the need for the sections on Wikipedia, photography, and Terry Pratchett, at least not until better sources are included. The Wikipedia section especially comes off as navel gazing, and many of the quotes seemed randomly selected.
At any rate, please do not add poorly sourced material back into the article, as has been done several times now; stuff like the lengthy discussions of comments sections are potentially serious BLP problems.--Cúchullain t/c 02:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes 

message: The problem with the section "on photography", and why it was originally removed in January  is that the sources are entirely articles by Jones: there's no evidence that these comments have had any influence or even been noticed by anyone else. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 07:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  On photograhy 

message: what qualifies as the most dimwitted assessment of Cézanne I've ever seen in print: <https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2022/sep/30/cezanne-artists-artist-picasso-admired-tate-modern>. This self-aggrandizing pretentious dolt does not deserve a Wikipedia entry. Kindly delete this page. 2001:7E8:C644:A901:B1CE:E6A1:992A:AC37 (talk) 20:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: He thinks very highly of us too. Johnbod (talk) 03:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  He's just written
Talk:Jonathan Goble

message: Both of the listed sources call him Jonathan Goble. --99.197.202.188 (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 01:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Jonathan Scobie →  – All of the sources and Authority Control links say Goble, also see https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Jonathan+Goble%2CJonathan+Scobie&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2CJonathan%20Goble%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CJonathan%20Scobie%3B%2Cc0 99.197.202.188 (talk) 23:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

text: *Support per the title of the book used in reference #2.  How is he named in reference #1?  GoingBatty (talk) 04:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: * He is called "Jonathan Goble" with no mention of "Scobie".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.197.202.188 (talk) 04:20, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

text: , however a redirect page needs to be kept in the former page. Pavlov2 (talk) 06:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

text: *Will the page be moved, and if so when? (Sorry, I'm not very familiar with the move request process; BTW I'm the OP) --Wikipedian who edited with an IP for a while (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 March 2022
Talk:Jonathan Tisch

message: Just changed one heading to a paragraph, from bullet point presentation--which reeked of promotion. If someone doesn't document all of the undocumented assertions, the article will be shortened. Tapered (talk) 22:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Agnes Hunt

message: It is an understandable error that she was born in Baschurch.  In fact she was born in London, stated in the Dictionary of National Biography and confirmed by the appearance of her birth registration in the GRO Index 1st quarter 1867 in registration district of St George, Hanover Square.  (She does not state her birthplace in her autobiography.)  She was certainly brought up in Baschurch where her family were landowners, and died a resident there.  I am amending her birthplace reference accordingly with citation to ODNB and GRO Index.Cloptonson (talk) 13:27, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace
Talk:Jones P. Madeira

message: NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master
Note: above has link to "Article name" version 987654321.
I dated it March 2008, per the copypaste section below. 
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 12:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright query

message: I see where and when the copypaste tag was added. Fortunately, the possible infringer which added the text shown http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jones_P._Madeira&action=historysubmit&diff=198655695&oldid=188419523 and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jones_P._Madeira&action=historysubmit&diff=204134158&oldid=199453109 doesn't look like it has been copied form any sources. I'll remove the copypaste tag. Minimac (talk) 22:08, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No copyvios found yet
Talk:Agnes Mary Clerke

message: The main body of the Life and Work section is lifted directly from this article in the Catholic Encyclopedia. There is a copyright saying "Copyright © 2012 by Kevin Knight. Dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary."; to be found at the bottom of every article on the site, which suggests that there IS a copyright on the online version of the Encyclopedia. There are also very precise instructions in the body of the article on how to cite from it, either APA, or MLA, which have not been followed. This needs to be sorted out. There is absolutely no proper acknowledgement of this source anywhere in the article, and it is too large a segment to simply be ignored. I am not sure how this should be treated, so I leave it to others to decide.Baldwin Clere (talk) 16:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please properly cite sources. 
Talk:Joost de Blank

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Bondage cover

message: I think there needs to be some mention of Golden Age comic covers. Many of these featured bondage scenes and appealed to a diferent age group than detective magazines. Here's a <a href="http://bcotd.com/">link</a>.
Given the entry pertains to picture covers it would benefit from a example of the genre.I don't know if magazine covers ever become public domain after a certain period of time.Phreestyle 12:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Valorisation

message: Originally when I wrote this article I assumed valorisation was a uniquely Marxian concept. However, I have since learnt that there are other modern uses of the term valorisation. Possibly therefore, the article should be renamed "valorisation of capital" to distinguish this kind of valorisation from other kinds.
User:Jurriaan 1 May 2007
:This is definitely the case. I first encountered the term long before I was familiar with details of Marxism and it was not in a Marxist context. 72.228.189.184 (talk) 02:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Valorisation, in its modern sense, is an oddity in English in that it is a perfectly good English word that is rarely understood in English-speaking countries, but commonly understood when folk in mainland European countries choose to communicate between themselves in English Brownturkey (talk) 13:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Both spellings have their supporters, although I personal prefer the (OED) -ization spelling.
The article should, however, chose for the one or the other. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 19:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  valorisation - valorization
Talk:Agustín de Iturbide y Green

message: :Is this article really start class? "An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources." Editors can improve the sourcing, but it seems to me the article contains all of the important information about the subject's life.Flyte35 (talk) 18:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah

message: Apparently a bot tagged and an editor removed a link for being to thepeerage.com but it was to royalark.net (different sites run by different people). 96.250.80.27 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:49, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd history entry
Talk:Jose ben Jochanan

message: This line is very confusing! the hasidim of the temple peirod were not a sect. Rather it define the a way of behaving oneself with pity and had nothing to do with beliefs! 203.206.234.139 18:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to "Hasidim" to "Hasideans".  —Dfass 01:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  belong to the hasidim... 
Talk:Ahmad Suradji

message: In the beginning it is stated that "He admitted to killing 42 girls and women ...". But at the end there is the sentance "...  although Suradji maintained his innocence, he was found guilty on April 27, 1998 ...". What is true?
Fixed. I found that there was no reliable source, or a source at all for that matter, discussing the 363-page charge against him and him maintaining his innocence, so I just got rid of the two. Depthburg (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did he admit or not?
Talk:Origins of Hutu, Tutsi, and Twa

message: The last paragraph talks about the "three" groups?  What is the third?  Are they referring to the Twa again?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JimJJewett (talk • contribs) 16:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarification 

message: AFAIK, both the ethnicities (or subethnicities, depending on who you ask) are a part of the general Bantu ethnolinguistic group. Or am I mistaken ? Is it more complicated ? --ZemplinTemplar (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  They are in the Bantu group, aren't they ? 

message: I don't know anything about the topic and the article was not helping me learn, so I tried my best to reorganize it into something that makes more sense. I made sections for different hypotheses and under each section there should be description of the hypothesis and the evidence supporting or refuting it. I think this makes way more sense than having sections of different research methods debating all hypotheses simultaneously back and forth. Historical facts shouldn't be dependent or research method. I left the genetic research section because it's too dense for me to parse, but someone more familiar with this topic should break it up and file those evidence to their respective hypotheses. C9mVio9JRy (talk) 19:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I tried to clean up
Talk:Ahmed Yacoubi

message: * Removal of a Malicious URL (LINK): (TROJAN SCRIPT)
* hxxp://www.paulbowles.org/ahmedyacoubi.html
* https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/7b0b7205df0f5e400313d09375a975fa19d967b6b4add4d48982be4c325917d6/analysis/1373013936/
* Threat: TROJAN SCRIPT
* https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/76102ef07db48fccef7a7972acdd317b24657bf3c321038c60eb276dc030a451/analysis/1373013448/
* Hex Obfuscation of substr % Encoding
* Hex Obfuscation of document.write % Encoding
* http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3551116 
* http://wepawet.iseclab.org/view.php?hash=f654d684980d0e46b032b5db6c98492b&t=1373013396&type=js
* http://wepawet.iseclab.org/view.php?type=js&hash=c50d61bf1bf54bd3d1d734d124fa2e49&t=1355262578
* See also:
* http://quttera.com/detailed_report/www.paulbowles.org
* ALSO: 12 Hidden Links found: http://www.unmaskparasites.com/security-report/?page=www.paulbowles.org/ahmedyacoubi.html
* 1) hxxp://www.leroyal.com/morocco/	(EXPLOIT)
* https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/7f8154487bcdbc29c287311fccb44997f242b64098513e4cfdd33f5b7f53cea3/analysis/1373014427/
--Gary Dee 13:33, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malware Link Removal