Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Taxation/Assessment

message: While not the basis for priority, I thought this may be helpful in the assessment process.  A bot ran through the What links here and this What links here count lists all WikiProject Taxation articles with the What links here count (minus talk space, wikipedia space, etc).  Helpful for linking too - I didn't even know we had an article on Income tax in Iran (0 link count) - I'll be fixing that. Morphh  (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What links here

message: While applying priority and class levels to articles I noticed that several of these articles were under multiple wikiprojects.  Of these sorts of articles the ones on cases like US Supreme Court decisions or Australian decisions stuck out.  Giving such articles low priority was obvious because the articles were on the case rather than the law/tax.  This also followed the instructions in the assessment scale.  However, the class/quality assessment scale seemed a bit awkward because they were under multiple wikiprojects.  These other wikiprojects focused on the precise topic of the article such as when a wikiproject concentrating on US Supreme Court decisions applied a class assessment on an article that is on a decision by the US Supreme Court. 
# Provided that the article sufficiently discussed the tax aspects of case, should the article's class level under WP Tax match the other wikiprojects since they focus on the precise topic of the article? (preemption)
##Yes, the class level is a global quality criteria that should apply across the board to any wikipedia article.  The quality is based on the article topic and has no additional weight with regard to a subject classification.  We're working to move these articles to GA and FA. Morphh  (talk) 1:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple WikiProjects 

message: I suppose we could amend this page to include the new C class unless there is some objection.  The C class would help to identify and separate articles that  are higher quality than start class but which would be stuck in start class until some other editors agree to increase the class.  Such articles that have their assessments arrested are somewhat hidden among the other articles that are in the start class and belong there per their current state.  The C class would also help identify the articles that are better than start class but have not yet made it to the B class and I should think that there should be a larger jump in quality between a start class and B class article because the B class article precedes the Good Article class.  The C class would be a good segue in quality between the Start class and the B class articles.EECavazos (talk) 23:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just wanted to quickly reply since I'm watching but don't have time at the moment.  Yes - I'll try to take a look at this and your other question today if possible.  Morphh  (talk) 13:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Amendment.  Originally I thought any classification above Start class required the concurrence with other editors and maybe that was so,  but then changed when I was away from editing.  I see in the assement page that any one person may rate an article a B class article.  I suppose that negates my point about articles getting stuck it the start class when they should be classifed above.  However, I still assert that the C-class would be a good segue between Start Class and B-Class because B-Class is the classification just before Good Article class and so that should be quite a jump in quality between Good Article and B-class. I generally see a C class article including sections related to notability/controversy/impact and history while a B class article improves upon that by including inline citations on important assertions (a Good Article classification would require a more thorough treatment within sections related to notability/controversy/impact while providing more inline citations).  Although maybe I am being somewhat of a tightfist when it comes to classification.  I have seen a jump in B class articles, so maybe what I believe constitutes a C class article should instead be a B class article. EECavazos (talk) 02:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New C-class 

message: I apologize if I did something wrong by adding in a request, but I can't really tell. In the middle of the page it says essentially "put your request here" then at the end it says the page is only a record and should not be edited. I got here through clicking on a link in the quality rating of the article I sought review for (Starve the beast). Request assistance or advice. DanielM (talk) 14:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The project itself has slowed down quite a bit since its creation.  So while not defunct, users are not as active in addressing such requests.  I'll try to take a look when I have time. Morphh  (talk) 15:21, 08 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The project has been marked as semi-active but we are making efforts to revive it. HawkGeminus 09:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: is this a defunct page?