lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hurricane Daisy (1962)

message: Non-notable storm, minimal info. This is getting irritating. Merge -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 04:27, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging sounds good. Hurricanehink 01:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Against Merge added more infomation. Storm05 16:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You added very little. The death toll was 5, not 24. The damage total, when inflated, is $62 million, nowhere near the total you gave. The storm is still not notable enough for its own article. Why not add the impact section to the season summary??? Hurricanehink 16:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read the link, it says the hurricane killed 24 people Storm05 17:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not an official source.  You need to go to NOAA for official sources. NOAA's list of deadliest cyclones is an excellent source, but it only lists cyclones that had or may have had at least 25 deaths.  Daisy is not in there. — jdorje (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also if you add information, you need to add the reference inline to the article.  Otherwise how are people supposed to know where the info came from?  You can't expect someone to read through all of the external links to find the one place that says the storm caused 24 rather than 5 deaths. — jdorje (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: There is minimal notable information.  More impact is needed. Jdorje 23:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to see some more sources, as its coverage on Canada is lacking. "Although total damage estimates are univaliable, it is estimated that damages could surpass $10 million (1962 USD) dollars" - That makes no sense. Although I know it's from the preliminary report, damage reports likely have been released in the 45 years since then. This is why some more research is needed. Typos need to be fixed, and the overall writing is mediocre. It's a decent start, however. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, typos are fixed, I improved the writing somewhat, and I added a little more impact. Juliancolton (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, my other comments still need to be addressed. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, I am still looking for canada info. Juliancolton (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, I can't find any info other than the preliminary report. Also, I believe it is up to B class standards. Juliancolton (talk) 18:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is plenty more information in the sources you have used. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks you, it really helps the article. Juliancolton (talk) 16:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:Genesis Planet

message: How about merging this to Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, seeing as the planet only makes a cameo appearance in Star Trek II, and is never seen again after its destruction?...  As it is, this article is basically just a summary of part of the plot of Star Trek III.  Morwen - Talk 10:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I don't believe the Genesis planet exploded at the end of Star Trek III.  We saw an eruption from the surface but the curve of the planet itself was still in shot.  I'd question the canonicity of the "explosion" of the planet. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Capt. Jeff Pierce (talk • contribs) 15:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Explosion?

message: This genesis planet page should be on its own.  Not only was the Genesis device used also in the Starfleet academy video game, but the Genesis conversion in Star Trek II was a landmark in special effects (discussed on the STII special edition DVD)  WhtKnight 14:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be its own page

message: This page helped me in my search about Terraforming, i implore not to delete it!
Tadija (talk) 13:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep it
Talk:Glycerophospholipid

message: To small to be its own article.  Needs to be merged under the larger group of acids.--Esprit15d 20:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe merge with phospholipids, not with acids.  Stable attractor 08:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: I believe that this is the correct translation of the german term Phosphoglyzeride and have added the interwiki link as such. Bobby1011 03:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  german translation 

message: Here are some things that I think would make this article better. Any feedback or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I think more information about the structure of glycerophospholipids needs to be given especially in regards to it's amphiphilLic nature. A diagram showing the two fatty acid chains, the phosphate group attached to the glycerol backbone would be good to further explain the structure. Also more information about the metabolism needs to be explained. How it is metabolised in prokaryotes and euckaryotes have been stated but an explanation to this processes have not been given. I would like to add more explanation to that. Again, a lot of emphasis were laid on the examples of glycerophospholipids but not much on it's uses in memberanes and emulsification which I think need more explanation. The order of the article seems good except for that I think the nomenclature should come before the structure and the metabolism should be placed before it's uses. Brittney Nchako (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding more discriptions to structure, uses and metabolism 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ekrodge (talk) 22:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cell Biology Honors
Talk:Orava Castle

message: There are a number of phrases and words throughout that suggest that the writer's native language is not English.  It is otherwise well-written, but clarity evaporates in the face of these elements.  Examples:
* The first black-and-white famous film should probably be worded "The first famous black and white film".  Since there is no form of motion picture film preceding black and white, it probably would be sufficient to say, "The first famous film".  However, the writer does not directly identify this film, and I question whether Nosferatu was in fact the first film to become "famous".
* The natural formation "Castle cliff" - limy spur 112 m high, modeled by the Orava River and its right tributary brook Racova, was inhabited in the Primeval Ages has a number of issues, specifically:
::*"castle" in "Castle cliff" should probably not be capitalized; if it is a specific proper name for this local feature, then both castle and cliff should be capitalized.  Either way, there is no reason to use quotation marks here unless it is an actual quotation, in which case the source should also be noted.
::*Is limy spur correct usage? Limy could refer to the soil content of the spur, but more likely the writer meant limestone.
::*Is right tributary brook correct usage?  Isn't it correct to refer to a tributary's relationship to the larger river in terms of compass direction?  Or is the writer meaning something else?  At any rate, the structure is awkward.  I suggest, "...modeled by the Orava River and the Racova, its [compass direction] tributary...".
::*What does the Primeval Ages refer to?  Generally this is used as a synonym for "prehistory", but is rarely capitalized.  In an article about an object that was built and occupied during very specific periods of history, this usage seems incredibly vague.
* I have been unable to find the word towerntury in any dictionary or encyclopedia.  It is not a word used in architecture or the science of military fortification.
* The phrase last shelter should not be in quotation unless it is actually a quotation, in which case the source should also be noted.
* Much of the subsequent description of the castle seems to require that the reader already be familiar with the castle's layout and construction history.  The writer uses terms like Middle Castle and Upper Castle without explanation.
* None of the personages involved in the castle's history currently have Wikipedia articles.  In such a case, it is probably advisable to incorporate information about these individuals into this article.
Canonblack 20:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I was just at the castle last week, and the tour guide repeatedly said the Dracula film was from 1918.
No, it is 1922, of course. See Nosferatu.Juro 02:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is that date right?
Talk:Richmond International Airport

message: This article needs to be cleaned up so it doesn't read like a compilation of copy-paste from the RIC  website and several RTD news articles. "Mid day molassas?" the pace of a "Faulkner novel?" C'mon!  MPS 20:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't this a copyright violation? The airport website simply has a copyright notice, nothing about terms of use. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 06:15, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pseudomonadaceae

message: Well, somebody is going to have to find those references again, since the deleted page, Pseudomonas flourescens, that they apparently came from, does not seem to be preserved. - Samsara contrib talk 20:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: It was good to see the etymology discussion in a related article, I forget now which one, but it still wasn't clear, so I was glad to see the link to this article.
Are monads one-celled organisms? Do they have a (flagellated or otherwise) foot?
Do pseudomonads, originally thought to have this foot, not have it? Or, do they look the same as monads, but without the foot?
I just want to know why they're called pseudomonads.
Thanks very much for any help anyone can give!!!
Entwhiz (talk) 21:56, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudo? Monads?
Talk:Satavahana dynasty

message: Andhrabhṛityas means the "Servant of Andhras" not Andhras "People of Andhra", as mentioned in inscriptions, even Historians refer the same as per the records belonging to them 
Ref :
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.280089/page/n11/mode/1up?q=Andhrabh%E1%B9%9Bityas CatTheMeow (talk) 06:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satavahanas were known as Andhrabhṛityas not Andhras  

message: I'm planning to replace the highly inaccurate map of the Satavahanas, which combines different historical eras into one. This map erroneously includes territories of the Sakas within the Satavahana Kingdom, particularly Gujarat. The cited source is unreliable as it merges various time periods. As demonstrated in the Vijayanagar Empire article, I will upload a more accurate map that I found in the Gautami Putra Satakarni article. DeepstoneV (talk) 10:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing highly inaccurate map of Satavahnas 

message: Satavahanas were Abhiras[] not Brahmins 2409:4085:8D31:A31E:0:0:88C9:1A12 (talk) 09:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satavahanas were Abhiras  

message: Satvahana dynesty religion is Sanatan Hindu Dharma not any Buddhism , Satvahnas reestablistshed Hinduism . Chandrashekhar Devidasrao More (talk) 17:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any reliable sources that support your statement? Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 18:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Charliehdb (talk) 10:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2024
Talk:Homogeneity (physics)

message: Merging this article with "Invariant (physics)" has been proposed. I think there is some potential for a full article on the general subject. But I would hope to also keep this page, to simply define the word for quick reference from physics topics that use it. I intend to reference it for that purpose in upcoming writings. -- Chris Mid 20:41, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia isn't for defining words, that's wiktionary- wikt:homogeneity. Bhny (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with "Invariant (physics)"

message: I just made a big cleanup.
I think the article is now readable and useful, yet still a stub. Both issues need to be developed (in separate sections). But I think the { { merge...}} tag could be removed now. — MFH:Talk 15:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  big cleanup 

message: this article is unreadable to a lay person such as my self. When giving examples to try and explain a concept it is better to give examples simpler then the thing trying to be explained, IMHO.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.120.227.160 (talk • contribs) 
:I split it up in 2 bigger parts for each of the meanings, and tried to add some more explanations and links. — MFH:Talk 22:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: Heterogeneous is the opposite of homogeneous and should be included. Hlunnb (talk) 00:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposite Definition 

message: The introductory paragraph of this article does not seem to bear any relationship whatsoever to the rest of the contents.  --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree that the intro does not seem to express homogeneous or Homogeneity in physics. I am going to give it a shot. But my knowledge is only about materials that are effectively homogeneous. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 04:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro
Talk:Tadcaster

message: Which secondary school? Where's the citation for this? Is it revelant to the article? How many other articles on towns talk about the quality of the town's schools?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.11.251.100 (talk • contribs) 
Ecellent secondary school quote removed until citation provided. Above comment not addressed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.11.251.100 (talk • contribs) 
Just added a major update. Would love to hear from anyone who can shed more light on the depopulation point I raise in the article. I know Tad had a much larger population in previous decades but the exact reason for the decline, aside from a leaflet I once read regarding the importance of the Wharfe for transport, is unclear. James 18:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't comment on the point you raise, but wanted to thank you for your exceptional work on this article. To bring it from a stub to this quality is amazing. Just wanted you to know your work is appreciated. — cBuckley (Talk • Contribs) 20:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My pleasure! Actually I was suprised to find so little info in the Wiki, and when I started editing the article I just couldn't stop. Isn't Wikipedia great? Good luck with your exams, mate. James 22:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does the "Tad-"/"Tate-" portion of the name mean? Badagnani (talk) 01:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of name 

message: Did the Tadcaster Viaduct ever carry passenger trains? Has there ever been a railway station in Tadcaster? Did the Micklethorpe to Church Fenton go via Tadcaster? There is a Station Road in Tadcaster, is this associated with a Train (or other) station? Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 11:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railway in Tadcaster 
Talk:It's A Long Way To The Top (If You Wanna Rock 'N Roll)

message: Someone needs to check who really wrote this song, atm there are 2 authors listed. IHassel 20:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Author of this song

message: Moved & expanded contents to properly named "It's A Long Way To The Top (If You Wanna Rock 'n' Roll)" (without the quotes). This was done to match the page name to the way the song is listed on the album credits. This page now redirects to "It's a Long Way to the Top (If You Wanna Rock 'n' Roll)." kidjesus 03:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Roberto García Morillo

message: ==Untitled==
Thank you por posting and enhancing this entry.
The Musician
:and you! ;-) Venullian 13:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice information

message: Thank you por posting and enhancing this entry.
The Musician
:and you! ;-) Venullian 13:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Toncontín International Airport

message: Since August 2008, the main runway is being expanded. The runway, which currently measures 1860m. will now have 2012m. long. This means that there will be an extra 300m. of runway to the South, and the hill located in that area is being removed. This is part of a plan done by Interairports to ensure a better approximation of the aircrafts, as well as more length for take-off. The new expanded runway will have 150m. of useful paved runway, 90m. of safe stopping area, and 60m. of reza, an area for better approach, and will be the only one in Central America to have one. This project, along with a recent repavement of the whole runway, will make the airport have a brand-new and modern infrastructure. This project also forms part of a series of recomendations done by the OACI, the International Organization of Civil Aviation, which inspected the whole airport after the accident of an Airbus a-320 from Taca on May 30, 2008, when the airport was temporarily closed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.13.77.56 (talk) 19:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toncontin´s main runway improvement 

message: The accident listed in the end of article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tan-Sahsa_Flight_414 needs to be added (L-188 Electra operated by "Sahsa Carga" (HR-TNL), in 1990). Ds380 (talk) 10:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A missed accident 

message: The PanAm aircraft could not have been a DC-3, as the first flight of that type was 17th December 1935, almost 2 years later.
86.139.221.171 (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First flight 
Talk:Ace Combat 5: The Unsung War

message: Is there a "list of planes in Ace Combat series" article that I haven't been able to find, or would that be more appropriately placed in a subsection here?  dunerat (talk) 23:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer your question, there used to be such an article, but it has been deleted. thank you. --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I had thought that there used to be one; why was it deleted?  Would it be better to have a single list with the series referenced off of it or simply subsections in the individual game articles? dunerat (talk) 10:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Playable Aeroplanes
Talk:Meander (art)

message: The article presents both a personal political bias and error in the following statement: "The symbol of the meander is considered to be a greek trademark, although it was altered and used by nationalists of Europe, degrading by this way its original meaning and value".
The meander, first of all, is only used by Greek nationalists -- and not, as the article alleges, by a number of various European nationalists.  Secondly, aside from its use as an ornamental pattern in art and architecture, its only significance and value is as a symbol of Greek nationalism; there is no other "original meaning and value" outside of that.  Finally, to state that its use by nationalists constitutes a degradation implies that nationalists and nationalism are debased which is clearly a personal socio-political bias of the author, not to mention quite offensive. Critias 21:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As two months have passed and no action has been taken to remove the aforementioned bias to give the article a neutral point of view, I have taken it upon myself to make the relevant changes. Critias 04:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: The ASCII examples of meander shapes are broken in 800x600 resolution, in case it matters. --Kaffedrake 15:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Broken for me, too. Ashibaka tock 20:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to move the section to this talk page because it was broken on my browser as well, but since there have been others who have comment on the same thing and nothing has been done about it, I'll just leave it cut out.  If anybody wants to take a stab at fixing it, here's the link to the last revision that had it before I nuked it: .  Hidden Glass 07:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphics 

message: No page is better than a page without references. Any suggestions for sources for a rewrite? I would be willing to contribute. Saji Loupgarou (talk) 14:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research
Talk:Wonderwall (disambiguation)

message: Please don't put the Oasis song at the top. 1) The film came first chronologically. 2) Oasis named their song after George Harrison's soundtrack album. 3) (film) comes (before) song in the dictionary. Just about the only motivation you could have for putting Oasis at the top is that you are a fan - and that's not the way we do things round here! (I should point out that I've seen em twice myself and have most of their recordings).
I'm wondering if we could/should remove the (song) and (film) bits. I might try it. --kingboyk 21:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Broadcast engineering

message: Knowledge section lists subareas of broadcasting. I searched for transmitters planning  in vain. Naturally, they must be within RF subsection. But they are not. Certainly, maintenance or satellite are different areas. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 14:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transmitters 

message: You need a license to operate a broadcast radio or television transmitter, don't you?   I have been looking for information on this and have been unable to find it.  Shouldn't this be in the article?  --ChetvornoTALK 09:30, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That varies from country to country. In the UK, broadcasting organisations need a licence, but individual engineers do not. Harumphy (talk) 10:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licensing 

message: What is monopole tower 41.115.86.28 (talk) 08:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology
Talk:Color-glass condensate

message: I just created this page, however I used the source material found at this BNL article which I referenced.  Despite the fact that it's a .gov website, I think there may be copyright on the material.  However, it is part of a press release publicizing BNL's work, which is rightly included in the wikipedia article, and there exists no explicit copyright statement on the page.  It can be argued that use of this information in any form, commerical or otherwise cannot harm BNL, so I wonder if the point is important even.
Perhaps someone should look at the legal issues here.  The article can simply be rewritten but I do not have time to do this now.  I made simple edits and wikification to the original to better fit an encylopedic context. - JustinWick 21:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Creation and Copyright 

message: http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2012/oct/31/unexpected-ridge-seen-in-cms-collision-data-again
http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.3890
I don't have time now to add this well 67.188.202.139 (talk) 17:21, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  prediction and measurement  OCT 2012
Talk:Faria Alam

message: I like how quickly that was updated, she was only evicted 30 seconds ago.
--Si42 21:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: All information in biographical articles must be properly sourced. See WP:BLP. Thanks, Wachholder 18:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have returned material from The Sun. One of the three original sources was a bad link. The other ("www.gg2.net") is a news aggregator with a now-working redirect. If you want to include this material, find the original source. I will continue to revert it if it is restored without a source. Thanks, Wachholder 01:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Both links work and together cover the story pretty well.80.225.13.108 10:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Offensive or poorly sourced material