lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Interfaith dialog

message: Both articles need major work, but I would suggest that they are ultimately distinct topics. Interfaith dialogue is a particular mode of interfaith interaction. But there are many groups in the more general interfaith movement that are not focused on dialogue, but rather on action. Both are vital parts of the interfaith movement, but the one does exist without the other. Certainly interfaith dialogue in itself has existed far longer than any "movement."
Both articles appear to be classic examples of initial entries by people with a very particular viewpoint. For instance, I was rather surprised to see Fethullah Gulen granted such an exalted status with regard to interfaith dialogue. Certainly he is a presence in some circles, but hardly definitive in my personal experience.
A recommendation: instead of merging the two articles, change "InterFaith" to the Interfaith Movement or something else. It could be argued that "Interfaith" is really just a word in need of definition, rather than a concept that warrants an entire article as such. Sfuqua 05:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article should exist as it is. Here a particular movement is mentioned. Gulen's movement is a very strong one which govents about 1000 schools all around the world and creates environments that the children of different colors gets education together for a better world. So Gulen's movement put the ideas into the action. It is not stated that the interfaith dialogue is started by Gulen in the article, it is refered to the article interfaith for a general use of the term. Gulen meets many religious figures all around the world including Pope, Cardinals, Rabbis etc from differnet denominations and religions to establish a dialogue atmosphere. Resid Gulerdem 07:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I merged this article to InterFaith. Please place future discussions @ Talk:InterFaith. Sam Spade 15:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/GPS waypoints

message: I just wanted to add one more.
Larry Sanger was right
You can come here make a contribution and get insulted for free.
I have no idea what a geocaching fanatic is but the idea that just adding coordinates to locations on Wikipedia is fanaticism is funny.
There was something about deleting the list because it was  UnEncyclopedic.
Quick delete these, there are actually lists of lists, how Unencyclopedic is that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topic_lists
I put the list here as a proof of concept because it fits in with this Wikipedia initiative.
NOTE: This is an experimental service, currently implemented as a proof-of-concept on an 
off-site server. It will later be included in Wikipedia proper. 
http://kvaleberg.com/extensions/mapsources/index.php?params=42_54_6_N_78_52_23_W_
Too many people are hung up with the traditional encyclopedia and fail to appreciate the advantages of an online Encyclopedia one of these is the ability to map it to the real world 
with coordinates. There are tremendous advantages to this, it is a very powerful navigation tool.
You do not have to list the coordiantes of everything just Items already in the encyclopedia and just the most prominent ones if you need to save space.
The information is valuable inside of the articles but it is even more valuable when it is combined outside of the articles. It is as if someone said that an A-Z index is useless because each article already has a name.
Far from being useless there are some profitable companies that actually sell this information.
Thank you for opening up my eyes to what a golden period this is.
There are enough people that understand the value to make it a profitable business but not enough that understand it enough to create profit draining competition.
You may not ever figure out why but you made me a couple extra million dollars.
I just want to make sure that the information I entered here in that article is deleted ermanently.
And I suggest you rest up because as more and more people become aware of the advantages of using GPS waypoints there will be others posting lists of coordinates here so remain vigilant and delete them all until in about 10 years everyone realizes how ridiculous that policy is. FredRys 05:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nissan KA engine

message: Why is the torque rating of the KA24E listed as 206NM @ 4400rpm where the original nissan pintara brochure (which I can provide as proof) lists it as 189NM @ 2400rpm? Perhaps the original author should have done more research into the actual power/torque outputs of the different models... and not assumed that all the KA24Es had the same output.
There needs to be more infomation, http://translate.google.co.nz/translate?hl=en&u=http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%25E6%2597%25A5%25E7%2594%25A3%25E3%2583%25BBKA%25E3%2582%25A8%25E3%2583%25B3%25E3%2582%25B8%25E3%2583%25B3
Was there a 2.0L version of the KA? Meltdown627 (talk) 05:05, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Rob Williams (comics)

message: If anyone knows how to get in touch with Rob I would love to know how.  I used to be a frequent poster on theintake.net but that site has since ceased to exist and I have no way of contacting him now.  Please email burdette_scott@hotmail.com with any information.  Thanks.
:You can often contact creators via their 2000 AD profile, or if not posting a note on the forum might work (as he is a member there)> (Emperor (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact?
Talk:Peter McLaren

message: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1140&context=education_articles Xx236 (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about Cuba
Talk:KAAL

message: I have moved this article back to KAAL from KAAL-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact KAAL. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. A 06:02, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: This TV/Rochester/Austin/Albert Lea/Mason City IA has ben removed 199.101.216.15 (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  KAAL-DT2
Talk:Germán Trejo

message: I saw this entry on the pages needing to be wikified. The original author of this never provided sources, so I have no idea how to validate this information because I am not an expert on the topic. Can anyone point me in a direction where I can attempt to verify this information? Furthermore, is this a copyright violation? It looks like it was copy/pasted right into wikipedia. Thanks! --BWD 06:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please help 

message: This page was created by German Trejo, beware of its veracity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4justice1 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beware of bogus information 

message: Read this
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2007/10/14/CentroMexicano.ART_ART_10-14-07_B1_5G866KG.html?sid=101  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4justice1 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  FRAUD ALERT 

message: Hi there. You messaged me on my talk page asking about the reason for my reversion of your recent edits.
The information you added was deleted because it was not accompanied by citations to reliable sources that support the claims you made.
For instance, you said that Trejo was born in Morelia, but you didn't provide any documentation to support that claim. Until you have that documentation from a reliable source, that information can't be included. You also said he went to Ohio State University, but did not provide any documentation to support that claim.
Of course, the article already says that Trejo graduated from OSU, so your addition was also redundant.
— Bdb484 (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted IP edits 
Talk:KIMT

message: I have moved this article back to KIMT from KIMT-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact KIMT. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. A 06:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: My 3.2 KIMT 3.3 And KIMT 3.4 has ben removed 199.101.216.15 (talk) 13:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  KIMT-DT2 KIMT-DT3 And KIMT-DT4
Talk:Howard Cooke

message: When did Sir Howard Cooke get this decoration conferred, & what is his connection with Canada? - (Aidan Work 06:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: C.D.
Talk:Brooke English

message: Why are all these random sentences bolded? It looks silly. Mike H. That's hot 06:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 20:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:PGA Tour (video game series)

message: All (or most of) the games should have their own articles... Between track listings, courses, golfers, and equipment makers, it would be fairly easy for anybody who has them to throw together non-stub articles very quickly.
I'll probably do '04, as it seems to be the title with the most new features over the last year's. Not to mention it is the only one I currently have ;)
Could somebody has the PC version please take some screenshots? (I have the PS2 version, and my GFX card sadly has no AV input...) (hopefully not with the PrintScreen key, it skews colors...) The highest graphics game mode, in fullscreen would be best (no need to worry about it slowing down, it'll be a still ;)), and some crops of the HUD elements)
Also, if you respond, please drop a note on my talk page, to remind to check back here. Thanks :)
Wulf 06:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles for Each Game 

message: Have begun to divide the article into different sections, will begin to add more information about the games. DD2006 18:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject Dividers 

message: Why there no mention of EA Salt Lake? Didn't they develop this game? (That's what the page there says.) --JamesBrownJr 17:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EA Salt Lake 

message: There is link to a site in the article that provides free user created courses for the pc version of TW but can anyone advise what is the status of such material, i.e golf simulation packages frequently talk about licensed courses so is it ok to use such home brew material or not? Obviosly it would be nice if it was. If not should there be a link on the page ? 194.81.124.199 (talk) 10:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Courses 

message: Do we need a separate article for Tiger Woods PGA Tour (video game)? I suggest merging that article into this one. --RegentsPark (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. Considering Tiger Woods PGA Tour is a series article, and no other game in the series belongs in there, I don't see why this would be an exception.  This is not the first game in the series, but an iPhone OS release.  Also, I don't see a logical section of the series article to merge this particular information in there.  Effectively, it would be a deletion rather than a merge. Brian Reading (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :PGA Tour® Golf and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#PGA Tour® Golf until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  BD2412 T 05:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "PGA Tour® Golf" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Janaka

message: Since I dont know how to edit sanskrit words in wikipedia, please correct the sanskrit letters to pronounce name correctly as "janaka".
:AFAIK the name should be pronounced as "janak" for the transliteration (and in Sanskrit). That is because in Hindi or Sanskrit or any other language that is based on Sanskrit the last "a" of the word is not uttered unless the word requires it. For example, राम् ("Rama" in English) transliterates to "Rām" not "Rāma" because we say it as "Rām" (Rā-m) and not "Rāma" (Rā-ma). Also, although commonly written as राम, the "ma" is always cut to "m" and the last "a" is not uttered - this is implicit and while writing, the last character is usually written as "म" instead of "म्" to save time and extra effort. But "म्" is the correct one, especially while writing single words. Rohitbd 10:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Protestant authors

message: The Catholic author one is pretty good now so I got to feeling bad there is no Protestant version. The problem I'm having though is I'm not sure what all denominations are considered Protestant. For example should I include Anglicans after all? And what about all those in New Thought Movements? Do Quakers count? Maybe the Hicksites don't, but what about the others? Then there's the non-trinitarians to wonder about.--T. Anthony 06:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *With one exception, these seem to be non-notable in the sense they do not have their own Wikipedia article.  All authors listed in other sections have their own articles.  Do these authors belong here?
*Assuming they do, is it acceptable to assume all our readers have Microsoft Word to read .doc files?  
I would not have noticed this article except for a very prolific new editor who just started editing today.  --CliffC 04:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, if they are not notable ( i.e. no wikipedia link) they certainly don't belong here - yet.Brian0324 19:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed Authors with no Wikipedia Link. April 7th Tom —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.156.25.64 (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authors listed under "Church of God(Anderson)" - questions 

message: ... is not Roman Catholicism.  For the article to insinuate, without source, that it's too close to be included in a list of protestant faiths is POV. Jclemens (talk) 21:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglicanism 

message: What, do those authors belong to a denomination called "Science Fiction and Fantasy"?  The other categories are by denomination--I'm probably going to recategorize or delete them at some point. Jclemens (talk) 21:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: agree......that was a goofy category......threw off the whole flow of things. Buddpaul (talk) 03:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science Fiction 

message: This is an odd list......and I'm a Protestant!! Buddpaul (talk) 03:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: It seems perverse to structure a list of authors into denominations. Up to about 1900, the default position in English was for authors to be Protestant, which is why it makes sense to have a genre of Catholic writers (Greene, Hopkins, Waugh, Chesterton, etc). This is a defined category, with its own community. 'Protestant' either needs to include several thousand more authors, or, if it only relates to people writing about Protestantism or their particular denomination, many of the people on the list should not be there.Martin Turner (talk) 21:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure into denominations seems perverse
Talk:Michal Rozsíval

message: Do you actually watch him play? let alone realize how many games he's cost the Rangers? Hes one of the worst defenseman in the league, period. Spooky873 (talk) 01:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is your opinion but Wikipedia should have a neutral point of view. —Krm500 (Communicate!) 01:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premier player in the League? 

message: The file :File:Michal Rozsival 2011.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Michal Rozsival 2011.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 01:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Michal Rozsival 2011.jpg]] 
Talk:Hinduism in Australia

message: Okay, so when was on the page, I saw this massive chunk of text in the intro paragraph. So I decided to move it to here:
Source: Much of the material and contents here (specially earlier census figures) are taken from Purushottama Bilimoria, Hindus in Australia, 1988, but is not acknowledged; author is noted as "Notable Australian of Indian Ancestry" (in Wikipedia!). The last sentence here is taken from Bilimoria's work verbatim! And it is nonsensical to say most of the Hindus are of Indian and Nepali origin; it should be Indian (whether India-born or of of Indian ancestry) and Sri Lankan (Tamil); there are more local converts (among Anglo-Celtic, other Asian or migrant, and Aboriginal stocks) to Hinduism than Nepali Hindus in Australia. Wikipedia is not a scholar's hub, that is why lot of falsities and unacknowledged material get put up. For correct and best and most updated account see: The Indian Diaspora: Hindus and Sikhs in Australia, edited/mostly authored by Purushottama Bilimoria, Jayant Bhalchandra Bapat & Philip Hughes, DKPrintworld, New Delhi, 2015. You cannot go past this source, mate. Namaskaram.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hindian1947 (talk • contribs) 13:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Besakih Temple

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
Suchitnanda (talk) 15:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: I don't feel like the title should include the epithet "Mother". As far as I can see on the Indonesian wiki and other Indonesian websites, the temple's name is never referred to as something like "Pura Ibu Besakih". What I do find sometimes is "Pura Agung Besakih" (Great Temple of Besakih), although that might refer to just one of the temples in the complex. Concerning the title however, I propose we move the article to a more neutral "Pura Besakih", which is also more in line with the other Balinese temple articles. Except for Tanah Lot, they always follow the naming convention "Pura XXX". - HyperGaruda (talk) 06:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Change? 