lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alex Spanos

message: I think that the statement "This was apparently news to the NFL..." violates the NPOV rules. Anyone else agree? Tedyc03 18:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly the tone of that passage (and that of some others surrounding it) seems more colloquial and a bit amateurish than it does biased.  The statement that he's unpopular in his hometown could use some support, but is not inherently non-neutral.  Wouldn't it be easier to just go ahead and fix these minor mistakes than flag the whole page as "disputed"??  Rkent 00:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: The last line which claims Spanos has dementia uses a citation for Denver Broncos owner Pat Bowlen.  That article makes no mention of Spanos.  This sentence should be removed until someone can find a citation to support the claim that Spanos has dementia.  According to the guidelines for BLP, there should not a poorly sourced and potentially libelous claim on the article. (I had removed it myself, but it was reverted as potential vandalism and I can't change it again myself. 142.116.188.167 (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in the source given. — Wyliepedia @ 14:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dementia?
Talk:Alex Staropoli

message: I feel this article would be improved with the addition of a picture of Alex. However, I can't seem to find one that is license-free (Only promotional press-kit-photos that don't really seem to be welcome on wikipedia anymore, or am I wrong? (Kazin (talk) 18:47, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added --Neo139 (talk) 17:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Spellbound (Siouxsie and the Banshees song)

message: This brand new user, 2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18 with a brand new ip has been vandalising this page for two months for genre warring. BEATWEAKer edited the same thing at this article on  01:10, 9 September 2012‎ as 2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18, what a coincidence. This was quickly corrected 15 minutes later by IllaZilla at 01:44, 9 September 2012 . Carliertwo (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2013: vandalism by a brand new IP [[Special:Contributions/2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18|2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18]] that looks like a clone of  [[Special:Contributions/BEATWEAKer|BEATWEAKer]], a user that has been blocked indefinitely
Talk:Alex Steinweiss

message: — Assignment last updated by Darthsungam (talk) 01:55, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Equitable Futures - Internet Cultures and Open Access
Talk:Alex Stepney

message: Why not make the man his own honours section instead of that messy paragraph that is not organised chronologically and doesn't fully list what he won under the 'honours' part of the page? 
As far as I can tell, he's won:
1967 League title 
1967 Charity Shield
1968 European Cup 
1977 FA Cup 
1977 Charity Shield 
Runner up: league 1968
                   Intercontinental cup 1968 
                   FA Cup 1976 
Davefelmer (talk) 01:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honours Section  
Talk:Spit It Out (Slipknot song)

message: Zero bullshit should redirect to this page. I dont know how, i tried, and totally fucked up. Some help would be appreciated.♠♦Д narchistPig♥♣ (talk) 22:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the redirect. It should be changed after the article gets moved, though. Sirius 128 (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zero Bullshit 

message: Surfacing was released as a promo single in France according to . Should "Surfacing" be made into an article? CrowzRSA 00:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surfacing 

message: On disasterpieces, it is stated that the video on the album is the 1998 version. are there multiple videos for this song? if so, should they all be included if we can find enough sources?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.140.249.219 (talk) 05:48, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video
Talk:Alex Tudor

message: "...99 not out, at the time the third highest score in a Test match by a nightwatchman (it is now the fourth)..." 
The Nightwatchman (cricket) article lists five Test centuries by nightwatchmen. Is this statement out of date, or is it about conflicting definitions of a  nightwatchman? Widmerpool (talk) 07:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fourth highest score?
Talk:Alex Vincent (actor)

message: Alex has a new poetry book published.  "Perception" is available currently on www.lulu.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reznorsnails (talk • contribs) 18:06, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Poetry Book 

message: I suggest to add a photograph of Alex. It will be helpful and will make this article informative. Kundan Ravindra Dhayade (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a photograph of Alex.
Talk:Alex Walkinshaw

message: They married on 21 June 2009 after several years together at the Queen's House in Greenwich in front of over a hundred guests.
: No wonder they got married.  They must have been absolutely sick to death of living their lives for several years in a  goldfish bowl, in front of over a hundred guests, and all they wanted was some privacy for a change, and the comfort of each other.  What on earth were they thinking?  What was so fascinating about their lives that caused these guests to stick around for years, just observing them?  I suppose they would have been obliged to invite these long-staying guests to their wedding.  I can't imagine they'd have had further friends who were not invited to be observers of their lives, but were invited to the wedding.  It's all very, very strange.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  11:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange arrangements
Talk:St. Thomas (song)

message: This song was also interpreted by Michel Camilo, accompanied by his own inprovisations--I would apreciate it if someone can find which album and in which year did he record it.
70.121.127.108 23:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On Thru My Eyes in 1997, for one. (If you wish to add this to the article, please remember that this tune is one of Sonny Rollins's most popular compositions and has been recorded by dozens of notable artists.) ---Sluzzelin talk 05:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: ELP Karn Evil 9 (from Brain Salad Surgery) quotes it briefly, heh. 173.228.123.207 (talk) 06:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  different interpretations of song 
Talk:Alex Webster

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 08:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: "perform bass solos (his most recognised and most notable being the one in the opening of the Cannibal Corpse song, Hammer Smashed Face)" - nope, sorry, that's not a solo, that's the main riff! I've seen CC several times live, have all the videos, and all the albums, never heard a bass "solo" from him (though he's certainly capable). I've removed it from the article. Pterantula 05:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bass Solos? 

message: A large chunk of this article is made up of quotes, so much so that it's almost autobiographical.    Sophus Bie (talk) 04:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Boi-ngo

message: Agreed there is still strong use of sequencers and synthesisers. My "stripped down" description referred to the sparser mixing of this album compared to their previous, this one uses much less overdubs for the most part with more punchy rhythm, but I suppose this is down to interpetation so can be removed. Although I did think the previous "prominent use of synthesisers" was false interpretation because synths and sequencers I'm sure were most prominent on Dead Man's party and SoLo. Would love to hear more from the band about the sound of the albums, every one is a little different and surprising, but they rarely talk about it!
Woombamillio (talk) 12:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Production sound
Talk:Alex White Plume

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 20:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: This article has a very heavy bias towards Alex White Plume especially as relates to his hemp production and the government action against him.  Obviously, the federal government takes a different stance on the sovereignty issue, yet there is no information (cited or otherwise) about this.  ++Arx Fortis (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: PBS produced a documentary program in July 2007 on White Plume and his crop, considering the issues of tribal sovereignty as well. It appears to be a complex, provocative case that has not received much publicity; am looking for more sources.Parkwells (talk) 01:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Stand Up (Ludacris song)

message: — Assignment last updated by Studentprojectbm (talk) 04:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: AFST 205 Spring 24
Talk:Standing Outside a Broken Phone Booth with Money in My Hand

message: Isn't the actual title of this song quite a bit longer? Recury 00:53, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A source would be quite helpful. :) Jmlk17 06:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

message: According to Billboard, it hasn't charted on the Hot 100, here is the chart history: http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100#/artist/primitive-radio-gods/chart-history/155427?f=343&g=Singles  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GD1223 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never charted on Hot 100, on airplay, yes 

message: The reliance on a single source in this article is fairly problematic. For one, the sighted source doesn't indicate where it drew the conclusion that it does about the meaning of the lyrics. Secondly, the vast majority of the lyrics do not follow the "love song" interpretation presented in that article. The song touches on multiple topics such as life, ageing, distance between people who are once close, religion and the passage of time, and is far more likely to be discussing the meaning and interpretation of life. Without a concrete primary source indicating the true meaning of the song, we can't say that the "love song" interpretation presented in this article is accurate.
174.91.122.54 (talk) 10:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Never once in the article is the track referred to as a "love song". Furthermore, your interpretation is your own unique view on the subject, making it original research. One source is all we have right now, so it'll have to do. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 01:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description in "Composition" section is likely not correct and relies heavily on one unverified source.
Talk:Alex Zotincă

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. – Michael (talk) 21:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Stargazer (Siouxsie and the Banshees song)

message: It seems to be common practice to supply references for music genres. I'm about to remove the unreferenced genres now. If they are re-added without some consensus here or a reliable source, I will take the matter to an administrator's noticeboard. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Genres
Talk:Statesboro Blues

message: The omission or unawareness of the Tom Rush version of this song is glaring.  It is the earliest and most authentic rendition apart from Willie McTell.  I have performed it myself and it one if most authentic blues songs 2600:1700:E5A0:37F0:AC49:B4E4:43C4:3966 (talk) 03:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statesboro Blues
Talk:Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Volkov

message: This article needs some references. Who do we attribute the quote that he has been dubbed 'the last citizen of the USSR'. I am sure he was obviously called that but a reference would be helpful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.247.119 (talk) 22:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 
Talk:Stay (Pink Floyd song)

message: Hi, I'm the one who added all this musicology stuff to the article.  I hope my fellow Wikipedians agree that this a useful sort of addition, because I could write similar sections on nearly every Pink Floyd song.  Of course, not all of them are musically interesting enough to warrant the attention "Stay" gets here.  Incidentally, I feel "Stay" is kind of a poor song overall, but it is musically interesting.--63.25.8.245 (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musicology contributions.
Talk:Aleksandr Baranov (general)

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 04:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Alexander Barkashov

message: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyxUnWVxY5U --Anidaat (talk) 22:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: just a note
Talk:Staying Together (song)

message: This Article was included for reasons unknown to me in :Category:2005 singles.  To my knowledge, this piece was NOT re-released as a single after 1988.  What evidence is there of a 2005 re-release? B. C. Schmerker (talk) 07:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: 2005 singles
Talk:Alexander Besher

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.alexanderbesher.tv/, various subpages. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.redroom.com/author/alexander-besher/bio. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 20:50, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: In addition to the major copyright problems mentioned above, there is also a possible conflict of interest in that much of this material was added by .  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 21:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI?
Talk:Step Back in Time

message: Since the sound file, :File:Kylie - Step Back in Time.ogg, has been removed by one editor citing WP:NFC, without saying how this image specifically violates it, I am starting a discussion here so that the image is not deleted simply for being orphaned.
The current consensus for sound files are that they are acceptable for use in single/song articles as long as they are small samples of the song. Aspects (talk) 14:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wrong about the current consensus and since there is no critical commentary per Wikipedia:NFC#Audio clips, I have reverted my own edit adding the sound file back into the article. Aspects (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use of sound file 
Talk:Step by Step (New Kids on the Block song)

message: *I keep moving this article to Step by Step (New Kids on the Block song) simply because there are several songs on the disambiguation pages with this title, but Fadiga09 keeps moving it back with the reasoning being that this song is the most important simply due to how many YouTube views it has (not to mention that this article doesn't contain any sources). Looks like I'll have to take this to WP:RPP. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL (talk) 08:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page moving

message: This discussion was listed at WP:3O requesting an outside opinion. In response to that request, I have reviewd the article history and this page. I also reviewed the conventions established at WikiProject Songs - specifically the naming conventions. The established norm by that wikiproject is that the addition of an artist name is only necessary if another article already exists using the "Title (song)" format. There is currently no other article using the "Title (song)" format on the english WP. The only other article about a song of the same name is Step by Step (Annie Lennox song), and this article predates that one by eight months. I do not see that the renaming of this article is necessary, nor that the WikiProject guidelines support such a change. It is my opinion that the article should not be renamed. Jim Miller (talk) 13:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion
Talk:Step into Christmas

message: Is that really "a different version of the vocals"? Even if it is, don't we need a secondary source that explicitly says that rather than just the primary source of the performance itself? It sounds pretty close to me. Isn't it just a straight lip-synch mime? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Gilbert O'Sullivan|The Gilbert O'Sullivan Show]]''
Talk:Stiff Upper Lip (AC/DC song)

message: I found :Image:ACDC Stiff Upper Lip.JPG and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:ACDC Stiff Upper Lip.JPG]]

message: :Image:ACDC Stiff Upper Lip.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ACDC Stiff Upper Lip.JPG