Talk:Upoc Networks

message: This page appears to be regularily white washed by UPOC employees to remove criticisms of their company.  Edits are made without any discussion on the talk page.
:The criticism section essentially uses weasel words and original research; the sole 'citations' are a boycott site, which is going to have serious POV issues. I've cleaned it up some, removing serious accusations whose sole citations are boycottupoc.com and adding . Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 14:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:RS. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 14:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Then cite the news sources and press releases directly. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 14:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Suppose that's because they were never valid to begin with? You could always look them up in the Wayback Machine; see Wikipedia:Using the Wayback Machine. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 15:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, then, I'm sorry, but you're going to have to find a citation that's from a reliable sources. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 15:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree that the intro is written from a POV perspective; but it's not so blatant that it should be removed. Besides, I don't object to the criticism, as long as you can source it. Or are you saying that you can't back it up? Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 15:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, no; it's too weaselly for my tastes. Essentially, if we allow statements in because of 'some say'-type statements, we allow anybody to add anything if they say 'Some people say that X'. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 15:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I live to please my corporate masters :-P Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 15:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia strives for neutrality in its content.  Please see WP:NPOV. -- Jmax- 15:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Credibly as though they may be, they are not relevant for this article, and such material should not be linked in to this article as they are not directly related to the article's subject. Please see WP:EL -- Jmax- 15:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 15:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I can see your point. However, in any case, you need to provide reliable sources; 'Boycott Upoc'-like sites don't count due to their fundamental non-neutral point of view. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 16:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Upoc Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061217015954/http://www.upocnetworks.com/ to http://www.upocnetworks.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061231172216/http://www.upoc.com:80/ to http://www.upoc.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Upoc Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080118051833/http://www.upocnetworks.com:80/about.html to http://www.upocnetworks.com/about.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified