Talk:Hocking College

message: The section had specific, seemingly factual statements, without good sources. If there are news sources for the statements, fine. But the three sources given did not cover all the points. The following is meant to indicate the sort of specific information that is currently missing.
August 2007 - It has been announced that the College is under investigation by the Ohio State Attorneys' office, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
:::Announced how, by who, what day? was there a news report?
According to numerous local and national press reports, ETC, ETC
:::Give reference for some of these news reports.
Specific targets of the investigation are the ______________ and __________.
:::Where did it say that?
It is alleged that ______used money ETC ETC
:::Who alleged that?? Was it only the newspaper that made allegations?
In addition to investigations by the FBI and Attorney General, the Ohio Ethics Commission is now investigating ETC
:::Did the Commission announce this? Is there a news release maybe?
Wanderer57 19:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  C I Section still needs better sources 

message: However factual the negative content may be on this page, it is still extremely biased in that none of the positives are mentioned. For instance, history is only about controversies, except for the founding date. Obviously, someone has an axe to grind with Hocking College. It may be legitimate, but Hocking College IS more than just the negatives. jaknouse (talk) 04:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The following information is poorly written and contains the same information as above, only the information in the above paragraph is better written and more accurately quotes the sources. Because of this, the following information is being removed:
In January 2010, the FBI began investigating a hate crime, when a note was found written on a bathroom wall that threatened that black students would be killed on February 2.[25] A racist note was found a short time later.[25] Subsequently, some black students withdrew from the school out of fear for their safety.[25]
[edit] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.30.5.4 (talk) 17:25, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant Information 

message: The criteria for "Notable Alumni" is subjective, based on the editor. Any person could potentially be called "notable" because no objective criteria exists. Look at any other college or university Wikipedia page, and you will see that they all determine "Notable Alumni" in different ways. Therefore,since the previous editor decided to inject their own opinion, as far as the people they determine to be "notable" on behalf of Hocking College, it is best to simply delete this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.30.5.4 (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are completely in the wrong, Mister Anonymous Dial-Up. Please see WP:N and WP:BIO. And, since you are irrelevantly obsessed by what does or doesn't exist in other articles, please have a good long hard look at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Qworty (talk) 03:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni 

message: Substituted at 18:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment