Talk:Korean architecture

message: Is there any way we can get more information about pre-1900 architecture in Korea. There is plenty of stuff on post-Soviet and post-World War II and a lot of referencing to earlier sytles, but no mention of what these earlier styles are. --Kerowyn 10:05, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Chief editor is working on it; we have been getting information in on Korean swords, and Korean flower arrangement, and Righteous army movements; expected to get more information on architecture over the next while, and add more on earlier times. Sorry for the delay. I will be filling in Goryeo temple architecture next, and related information to Japanese temple architecture originated by Koreans; and as well the Confucian styles. It's a very big subject, and the initial thrust was to talk about the new wave of atelier architects, and then go retrograde. Thanks for the encouragement.
--POofYS 01:57, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Architecture

message: Please clean it up.  The ==Sports architecture: transition to a Korean style== is against wikipedian style.  What kind of title is that.100110100 01:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged Section's Title 

message: I see no mention in this article of Korean castles or fortresses. Certainly they existed, and certainly many are still extant, no? Wikipedia:WikiProject Castles has recently come into existence, and could use the help of experts on Korea to expand Wikipedia's coverage of castles and fortresses around the world. Thank you. LordAmeth 12:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean castles 

message: Someone should make put architectures like Kudara-ji, Kudara Odera, Horyu-ji, Asukadera, etc. Baekje impact on Asuka period architectures. Also, Japanese Yayoi-Kofun architectures was greatly influenced by Southern Korean proto-types.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.15.7 (talk) 18:41, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean architectural influence on Japan. 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Northeast Asia Trade Tower, Incheon, South Korea.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Korean architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080622234947/http://www.koreanculture.org/06about_korea/symbols/14dancheong.htm to http://www.koreanculture.org/06about_korea/symbols/14dancheong.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110703082420/http://www.koreanbook.de/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=84_125&products_id=1238 to http://www.koreanbook.de/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=84_125&products_id=1238
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051024190851/http://www.ucnet.pe.kr/Architecture%20in%20Korea/KA-Contemporary%20Building-Seoul-01.htm to http://www.ucnet.pe.kr/Architecture%20in%20Korea/KA-Contemporary%20Building-Seoul-01.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It's so close. Detailed but poor sourcing... At least it'll be informative to people, but it's still not a "good" article. toobigtokale (talk) 00:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argh