Talk:Storytelling System

message: Storytelling System should be the main article for this page, with this page working as a #redirect Storytelling System since this article, and the current system is called that title.  "Storyteller System" is a defunct name. -WildElf 19:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the system describtion should be larger, like in the Storytelling System article. I'll start, but would aprechiate, if someone would pick up. Heinrich k 09:43, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed, especially since this article is small and one is an extension of the other. Web Warlock 14:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I believe the differences should be highlighted in the description of the system. Right now, I am working on writing up the history with references to show notability. Turlo Lomon 05:46, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The character creation and game mechanics sections currently contain rules and mechanics from both systems with no distinction between the two. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned up the character creation section. I'll let someone more familiar with the Storyteller System clean up the game mechanics section. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 07:40, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: As far as I remember, the Aeon Trinity RPG was meant to be based on content from people with each getting a % of the sale, and possibly under some sort of open source ruleset.
Anyone have a better memor than me, access to the original advertising material or documentation that might shed some light ??
16:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trinity Rules as Open Source

message: Is there some reason this article repeatedly put the qualifier 'In the Storytelling System'?  The article is about the Storytelling System, so the heavy use of the qualifier is odd.  Oh, and 'Exclusive to the Storytelling System' is also odd since other game systems do use things like Initiative and Size.  PerlKnitter (talk) 19:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Having done more reading in this and Scion, I see the distinction that is being made.  But it is still a bit confusing if you are coming in from outside and trying to understand.  I still think that the use of qualifiers on sentence after sentence is not a good approach.  PerlKnitter (talk) 19:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We could reorganize the article's heading structure, giving Storyteller System and Storytelling System top-level headings rather than combining information from the two versions in the same paragraphs. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 23:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: Almost the entire page screams WoD this and WoD that, but this page is about storytelling and the storytellers. Exalted does NOT fit into the WoD what-so-ever; but like all the other games, it is created by White Wolf and thus the "GM" is called the Storyteller.  This, however, does NOT mean all the games play exactly the same. For example, In WoD you need to roll 8-10 for a success but in the world of Exalted 7-10 is what is required for a success. There are many more differences, big and small, from game to game but it is all still called Storytelling. This page focuses on WoD Storytelling and nothing more.
Also in the "Book" section of the article, every book there is based on oWoD and nWoD but completely forgets that other games do not use WoD rules; so it leaves them out of the "Books" section.
This page should be cleaned up quite a bit, remove the WoD slant that is written there (because it seems to be more focused on WoD than the Storyteller and Storytelling) and both oWoD and nWoD can be noted with a linked to their respective locations on Wikipedia.  Frosset Mareritt  07:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page needs to be seriously cleaned up