Talk:Rubén Hinojosa

message: It has been observed by Orlady (talk) that there are many un-sourced allegations on this article. Should we remove those sentences, or just heavily edit them?
Austudent1 00:42 August 30, 2010  —Preceding undated comment added 00:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not this again. What consensus are you talking about?  It's been explained to you repeatedly that the person adding the material needs to build consensus. It is not up to other editors to "justify" point by point what is wrong with your edits, it's up to you to explain why they belong. WP:BRD is not WP:BRDRRRRRRR]].   Also, you're well aware that there are certain rules for a WP:BLP, that questionable material must be removed immediately, and that anyone who restores that material will be blocked for edit-warring (as you were).  As for the material, too many problems to list individually, but my edit-summary was a good start. Do you really think that blogs and the Wikipedian are reliable sources for a BLP? And why did you remove the standard Congressional committee assignments section and replace it some editorial criticism.  That's just absurdly tendentious.  --Loonymonkey (talk) 14:59, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Here we go again. I have no problem with the standard congressional committee assignments. Frankly I meant to move it down. There are no editorial criticisms. It is a fact that Hinojosa's staff was manipulating Wikipedia. We have long sections that feature similar discussions of similar congressmen. It's not a WP:BLP violation simply because you say it is. You need to explain why something is BLP violation. It is a fact that he he has missed some of the meetings. You didn't engage in WP:consensus last time. You marked my serious edits as WP:vandalism and didn't even talk to me about them. I think it's time we bring an admin into having a discussion about your behavior. Until you can explain how any of this violates WP:BLP. It's not a violation if you say it is. 
And I don't appreciate being stalked here. We are going to have to go to mediation. You refuse to even explain what the BLP violations are. You don't use the talk page when making an edit and simply assume that the summary discussion. You are engaged in some serious tendentious action. Let's bring in some admins. --Starbucksian (talk) 18:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

text: User:Loonymonkey, I have added back some of the material about congressional committee assignments. I am going to leave up the BLP material that you say is offensive because you have not been able to explain what that material actually is! Do all of my edits qualify? Your actions would seem to suggest that that is the case as you reverted all of my edits...I'd like it if you would listen to TB, and stop WP:Hound.Starbucksian (talk) 19:13, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know how many times WP:BURDEN needs to be explained to you, but edit-warring by repeatedly adding material which violates WP:BLP will just get you blocked again. --Loonymonkey (talk) 20:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For the last time: What is the BLP violation? We're waiting. It's disruptive to repeatedly bring someone before the admins who are trying to participate in the process. You can't answer it.--Starbucksian (talk) 23:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Allegations 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rubén Hinojosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20140305180619/https://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/mar04_169_state.htm?x=0&y=218&id=176 to https://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/mar04_169_state.htm?x=0&y=218&id=176
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified