Talk:Daguerreotype

message: https://tvaraj.com/tag/mozi/ RPSM (talk) 14:34, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI: footnotes can be made to appear at the end of the relevant section, rather than confusingly at the end of the most recent section, by putting "reflist-talk" (using double curled brackets in place of the quotation marks) at the end of that section. 66.81.247.155 (talk) 06:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to useful reference tracing what mozi and the ancient Greeks knew about the '''camera obscura'' 

message: 150 notes down there and more citations are required since dec. 2016 ? Could someone show the reader where are missing citations & problems, in order to work it out, thks. --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More citations ?? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Daguerreotype. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20140104213434/http://www.nationalmediamuseum.org.uk/collection/photography/photographictechnology/collectionitem.aspx?id=1990-5036/6956 to http://www.nationalmediamuseum.org.uk/collection/photography/photographictechnology/collectionitem.aspx?id=1990-5036%2F6956
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527210757/http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artMakerDetails?maker=1699 to http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artMakerDetails?maker=1699
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927111012/http://www.daguerre.org/resource/history/history.html to http://daguerre.org/resource/history/history.html
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130101073420/http://www.cca.qc.ca/en/collection/1350 to http://www.cca.qc.ca/en/collection/1350
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Phys.org Research team uncovers lost images from the 19th century
June 22, 2018 by Jeff Renaud, University of Western Ontario
Smallbones(smalltalk) 14:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful article on restoration+ 

message: Why has Woolcott's camera disappeared from the article? RPSM (talk) 11:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was the role of Wollcott's mirror camera in early daguerreotype portraiture (eg in Beard's rooftop operation in the Regent Street Polytechnic? 

message: Did someone change a variant spelling to be the same as the initial version? Lexaxis7 (talk) 18:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the purpose of the redundant word "daguerreotype" in the first sentence? 

message: This article is about Daguerreotype photography--which is a big subject in itself.  But it wanders off into talking about the "Who invented photograph?" controversy.   Whoever that was, it wasn't Louis Daguerre (as both Beaumont Newhall and Watson & Rappaport make clear). Mgryan (talk) 19:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the invention of photography be a separate article? 

message: Something missing from the discussion of the rapid spread of the technique is how. That is, were photographers learning the technique and themselves creating the plates, the cameras, etc., or were these made, sold, and distributed by companies?Bill (talk) 04:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Spread