lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cagiva Mito

message: * My manual (2001 Evo) gives a compression ratio of 7.1:1, but I've used the figure from the specs PDF available on Cagiva's website. The latter gives 7.4:1
* The rake angle of 25 degrees needs confirming.
* Haven't filled in the power for the regular mito in the specification, as this seems to vary from source to source. I've seen it vary from 31bhp up to 35bhp...
* Engine based on Rotax?
* If anyone can do a good history/development piece then please go ahead!
* Someone changed the power to 90bhp for the Mito SP525 - there's no way its that amount. I've seen 37 bhp and 39 bhp quoted, thats why I wrote the figure at 37+ brakehorsepower. If you do know differently in this respect please write something on the talk page here, quoting your source, but in the meantime I'll change it back.
*Need to mention the Cagiva Planet somewhere (now the Raptor 125?). Too similar to mito to warrant having a separate article methinks. Bumper12 14:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

message: : Evolution model has been dropped from www.cagiva.it website. Looks like the new mito SP525 is the sole model being sold now. we should reflect this in the article.87.194.223.183 (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  evo dropped
Talk:Martin Sexton

message: External links sections are not a parking lot for unused sources for the article. Articles should appear crisp and clean. I have moved all the link farm here but haven't evaluated the sources, so please check them out before using them. Please put future sources here in the future, too. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources belong here
Talk:White Mountains (California)

message: Using White_Mountains_(California) as the link name doesn't accurately reflect the area which includes significant portions of Nevada as the text indicates. I'm hesitant to change it because I don't want to break links, but it should really be changed here and on the disambiguation page.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gentilcore (talk • contribs) 17:39, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Change to what? Mountains are predominantly in California and both article and disambiguation page make it clear that range extends into Nevada. Glendoremus (talk) 18:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link name is bad 

message: Now I hope WMRS folks will take it further on their long, quiet evenings!76.80.26.121 14:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sustantially expanded text.
Talk:Ulrich Graf

message: in my book "the life and death of Hitler" by James cross Giblin, it says that Ulrich lost his life after being hit by only 6 bullet's, it also goes on to say that Hitler mourned the loss of his loyal body gaurd who had taken the bullet's ment for him. i think its strange that this book would say that and other sources say otherwise.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blacky726 (talk • contribs).
:♠Graf survived the debacle of the Beer Hall Putsch although he was wounded. Toland's account (based in part on post-war interviews with Frau Hanfstaengl, who nursed Hitler after his taking refuge in their villa in Uffing immediately post-putsch) recites that AH was heartsick over the loss of both Graf and Ludendorff, both of whom he saw go down. Of course, it's no wonder that he thought Graf was a goner; Graf was obviously severely wounded and was apparently lying right on top of Hitler, having taken bullets intended for AH (see Toland). Ludendorff, however, was never touched (although, contrary to most accounts, he did hit the deck when the shooting started, as would any professional soldier, by instinct). So AH's belief immediately post-putsch that Graf was dead was quite reasonable; and also quite false, as was his belief that Ludendorff had likewise been killed.
:Graf also served -- along with Hans Frank -- under Major Walther Buch (formerly of the Reichswehr) on Hitler's rather fascinating internal "Nazi court", the Untersuchung-und-Schlichtungs-Ausschuss (Committee for Investigation and Settlement), which was established in 1926 to "adjudicate" intra-party "disputes" {actually it was to keep them quiet and out of the public eye}. Shirer, p. 122. Your source no doubt just "assumed" that because Graf was wounded so badly (he was) and because AH thought Graf was killed (he did think that at first), that therefore Graf was a goner. But Graf was a tough guy and survived.
:Actually it's a pretty bush league mistake to write that Graf died in the putsch. AH made a big deal out of the "consecrated dead" and re-interred them, made a big dedication to them, and it's not at all hard to find out their identities. A simple check by the author against the names of the 16 dead putschists would reveal that Graf wasn't among them. One strike against Giblin for his research methodology :-)). SixBlueFish (talk) 16:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The deWiki article mentions his time on the Munich city council and a couple of other positions, but I have not yet checked the references. Agathoclea (talk) 17:22, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Time in Munich
Talk:Warner Mountains

message: Please work your desired additions into the existing text. Removing the manual of style edits and links to existing and potential articles by completely overwriting the article is not helpful. The article is also still completely unsourced. Facts in Wikipedia articles need to be cited using reliable sources. If you need help, please ask here. Katr67 (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits

message: Somebody recently numbered the references. I'm guessing this was a preliminary step toward making inline citations? If so -- the way you've chosen to number them is unconventional, but will work. If you want to just add unformatted citation numbers into the text (like [1], [2] etc.), I will watch for that, and convert it into more standard Wikipedia formatting. That way you don't have to learn all the nuances of wikiformatting citations, which can be a bit of a pain. -Pete (talk)
  
: Yes I am the one who provided more information to the Warner Mountain page.  It is looking much better.  I also just did an edit on the Nevada-California-Oregon railroad to add some information on the architecture of the buildings.  Yes I numbered the references on the Warner Mountain page with the idea of putting them in the text where they belong  but I can't figure out how to do it.  But I will try to do it the simple way you suggest up there and then maybe you can fix it up.  Thanks.  MRA
:: Thanks for providing the inline citations. I just adjusted the formatting. Going forward, if you want to add citations to the same sources, you can just add the following codes at the end of the sentences, and it will link to the appropriate citation. Thanks for your contributions! -Pete (talk) 18:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References -- a suggestion
Talk:Copy Exactly!

message: When this article was requested, at first I though it was a typo in the instructions on how to request an article. It turns out, it was a legitimate request for a real Business terminology. I finally found sources, but it seems as though companies other than Intel do not implement it under this name... actually, this maybe common knowledge and Intel happend to put a name on it. I DON'T KNOW. So, I'll start the article, but please feel free to contribute and expand. --Emana 04:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page creation
Talk:St George's Hospital

message: anyone know what the two massive derelict buildings are and will be used for  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sailor iain (talk • contribs) 09:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  derelict buildings 

message: Is this article and St George's, University of London about the same institition?  John Vandenberg 04:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why yes, indeed they are. John Vandenberg 12:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No: one's a hospital the other's a medical school. They are associated and on the same site. DavidCh0 (talk) 13:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  same institution? 

message: When I saw the subheading in the contents I assumed it would be over hygiene, overcrowding, or something bad happening now or in the recent past. I was surprised to find a case of misdiagnosis from about 230 years ago. Perhaps a better title would be Historic controversies or something that suggests it is  of historic interest but not relevant today. 90.203.45.189 (talk) 08:08, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  So-called ''Controversy'' 

message: The photo of the hospital's sign clearly has a dot in "St. George's".  Is that the hospital's official name? DHN (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Carrie Fulton Phillips

message: This article has huge sections that are unsupported with citations.  Is it just made up?--23.119.205.88 (talk) 14:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsubstantiated 

message: References to 'Harding's descendants' and 'the Harding family' would need qualifying, since he had no direct descendants. And... could you manage a somewhat younger photograph of a widely acknowledged beauty? I don't think a picture from her eccentric old age is really appropriate. Valetude (talk) 15:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harding's family 

message: the article indicates that a court injunction prohibits publication of the letters until 2023; however they have apparently been published within the past week or so.  Did the Harding family decide to speed up the process, or what? Terry Thorgaard (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court injunction 

message: Reference #21's domain (thehardingaffair.com) no longer exists, it seems. Instead, clicking it sends the reader to Fortune Magazine's website.2620:0:E50:200F:49D6:C61:B6E:5ABF (talk) 02:57, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link
Talk:George Cabot Lodge

message: This entry notes that poet George Cabot Lodge died "near Nantucket." As Nantucket is an island, does that mean he died aboard ship? MarmadukePercy (talk) 20:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question 

message: This article states he was a "poet and politician" but there is no reference to that in the article or in the biography listed (available on Google books). I am removing this from the article. -- BCorr|Брайен 13:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poet and Politician?
Talk:Ben Buckley

message: I know he used to live in Tasmania, but is it his "home state" (I don't think he was born here) and is there a source for the smithton/burnie thing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuq (talk • contribs) 06:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right about that, Chuq, he was born in Melbourne and lived in Victoria before going to Tassie as a teenager. But I happen to know him personally, and that won't do as a source, so not sure how to correct that, except to leave it here on the Talk page. Misterdequincey (talk) 13:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 
Talk:All Dogs Go to Heaven: The Series

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 04:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: The character section seems to be too full of marketing speak and peacock words. Lots42 (talk) 07:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes indeed.... Maduro five (talk) 20:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character 

message: Can we really be sure if any of these Voice actors and actresses were at any point on the show; And if so what were their roles? NettFox  —Preceding undated comment added 21:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional voices
Talk:Conder token

message: The following page contains links that I visit often and find extremely useful for price and sometimes rarity reference (the archived auctions more than the online collections). I do think that the page would be helpful to anyone interested in the Conder branch of numismatics especially newbs who are more likely to be looking at a wiki page on Conders than a veteran collector of the series. Nonetheless, Experienced collectors may occasionally reference many of these archived auctions as well, to check for info on provenance and for the above mentioned reasons. Thus, I do feel that the link has a valid and useful purpose on the 'conder token' page. It is functional and accessible to the user and relevant to the article's content. Let me know what you think.
http://www.condertokens.net/tokenimages.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Condertokens (talk • contribs) 23:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  A look at the homepage quickly and obviously reveals the site's main purpose is to sell coins and promote affiliate marketing. This does not comply with guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. Bobby I'm Here, Are You There? 00:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states under the heading 1.1 Coin shortage, "The Royal Mint struck no copper coins for 48 years, from 1773 until 1821," but then under 1.2 Matthew Boulton and The Soho Mint and 1.3 The return of government coinage, it provides numerous examples of mint coinage during those years.  This needs to be explained or the exceptions noted in 1.1.  --Zeamays (talk) 19:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency / Direct contradictions
Talk:Alvin M. Johnston

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 04:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: In Chuck Yeager's autobiography, it mentions a Tex Johnson who worked for Bell on the X-1 program. Was this a typo and they actually meant Johnston? If so, and Johnston worked for Bell prior to working for Boeing, then this is an important detail. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 05:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Guess so.  —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 05:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bell test pilot? 

message: Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 21#Category:Missing middle or first names, :Category:Missing middle or first names has been added to this talk page.—DomBot / ChiDom talk 09:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add maintenance category 

message: The Discovery Wings channel no longer exists. Discovery has replaced it with the Military Channel. 173.170.255.211 (talk) 20:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Information 
Talk:Venera 11

message: The photography of the Venera 11 is exactly the same of the Venera 12. Which one is correct?
* Both craft are identical, like Viking 1 and 2, for example, the Voyagers or the Pioneers. Ricnun 19:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the design of both satellites is the same, it's not correct to use the same photography anyways, or?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arik z3 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Images of the spacecraft 

message: Eg Drilling into Venus says "To make more room for cloud-analysis experiments, the parachute system was reduced to just a pilot chute, a supersonic braking chute, and a single descent chute which was jettisoned at the bottom of the cloud layer (49 km). As the atmosphere thickened with depth, the craft slowed from 50 meters/sec (112 mph) to a landing speed of 8 meters/sec (18 mph)" - Rod57 (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More detail in the external links
Talk:Venera 12

message: The photography of the Venera 11 is exactly the same of the Venera 12. Which one is correct?
* Both craft are identical, like Viking 1 and 2, for example, the Voyagers or the Pioneers. Ricnun 19:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

message: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40645-018-0181-x
©Geni (talk) 09:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Paper talking about lightening detection on the surface
Talk:Mistake of law

message: This example does not clarify its premise that marijuana is illegal in the example state. I am not a lawyer so I don't know how best to phrase this sentence but, as it is, it reads strangely for people in areas where marijuana is legal for medicinal use.  Unless this page is U.S. only, which is not stated anywhere. -- abfackeln 05:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marijuana as an example? 

message: Did anyone notice the particular selection of names at the end, Jennifer, Ben, and Judd?  It seems highly inappropriate to use those names in such a manner. -- Myria 02:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: what is the significance of those names? --dan 07:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jennifer and Ben? 

message: I have placed a couple of templates to warn the unwary reader about the lack of sourcing for this article.  I can only speak as a person generally familiar with US law.  In the US, the principles of "mistake of fact" and "mistake of law" are primarily principles of contract law, not criminal law. In US criminal law, AFAIK, the principle of "mistake of fact" is simply called "mistake", and there is no acknowledged principle called "mistake of law" that is used as a term of legal art in criminal cases.  Unfortunately I don't have enough time to rework the article content and provide sourcing for what I've just said, at least not right now.  Maybe later. ... Kenosis 21:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: West's Encyclopedia of American Law contains an entry for "mistake of law,"  this LexisNexis criminal law outline includes information on "Mistake of Law," and this criminal law text notes the importance of the "official statement" mistake of law doctrine. DickClarkMises (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Templates

message: To explain with examples and their definitions  or easy explanation to help us to understand better. 157.119.201.186 (talk) 10:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake of law
Talk:Rare Bear

message: Rare Bear's claim to be the fastest propeller propelled aircraft cropped up on the Hawker Tempest page - um, I hate to bring the cold war back up, but before anyone says that too loudly they may want to read the performance specs of 1950s Russian airliners - the Tu114 in standard layout claims 541mph, albeit at altitude, (Rare bear claims 540mph at 5,000 feet) - couldn't find figures for record breaking variants of the Tu95 but in standard layout it claims 575 mph. Suspect you might want to change claim to "piston engined", though may be wise to check that,too. 
Er, also, on further back ground checking this article appears to be plagarised from this site .   Winstonwolfe 05:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bryan Pata

message: Is this really notable?  A non-star from a college football team?→ R Young {yakłtalk} 03:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's under the category 'shooting victims'.... I would change the name of the category to 'notable shooting victims' if you want to also screen that category for notability.  Does getting shot and dying at 20 automatically make you a noteworthy person?  Well, I can only speak for myself.  I would be interested in reading the circumstances behind these deaths.... maybe not encyclopedia-worthy, but I would like an external link which keeps track of them if there isn't already one....Dave925 09:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please change all instances of "hurricaines" to "hurricanes". --- RockMFR 00:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hurricanes
Talk:Robert Seldon Lady

message: He is reported to be among those who have returned to the US, leaving behind a villa in Italy which he bought with his life savings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.220.231.106 (talk • contribs) 
:That's what they always say: "I didn't know they were going rape her", "I thought he had enough air back there in the trunk. Anyway I was just the driver, etc." I'm afraid it's most likely going to be necessary to appropriate that villa, in order to provide restitution for the victims, you know. It's kind of hard to feel sorry this guy for his villa, being as he has another one in Honduras, as well as a house in Florida... and if he's willing to appear before a truth and reconciliation commission, perhaps he can look forward to a general amensty, and one day, the privelege of entering the EU on a normal tourist visa. That's a lot more than many innocent people caught up in these shenanigans that Lady and his cohorts willingly abided by (even if some of them, in the backs of their minds, also "objected" to them) can look forward to. Whiskey Pete 23:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems this has costed him a lot, wonder if its worth including in the article 

message: While the photo is (apparently) real, the "wanted poster" is clearly not. Seldon is not wanted in the United States, and therefore listing U.S. statutes is ridiculous. This is not a document from a law enforcement agency, it is a fabricated graphic used by a highly POV news source to illustrate a highly POV article. As I said in my edit summary, I altered the wiki-link so it went directly to the "wanted poster" which in my opinion is bad enough, but that article is so rancorously, hysterically POV that I think it's bad faith wiki'ing to link to it as if it's anything even resembling an unbiased factual source. It's not even in the ballpark. Ford MF 05:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The photo

message: Do we know anything about him other than the abduction case? Most of this article is a rehash of the article about the imam rendition, is he just a person known for one event? Fences&Windows 04:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Balance
Talk:Augusta Jane Chapin

message: The UUA has given permission by email to post the contents of biographical articles on Wikipedia as long as the following source is cited:
http://www.uua.org/uuhs/duub/index.html
--Mikebrand 05:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission
Talk:Lempira (Lenca ruler)

message: Unfortunately, the entirety of this article's previous text is an apparent copyvio, taken from this webpage, which itself acknowledges the text is taken from a book by some advisor to the Honduran Ministry of Foreign Relations. I've deleted the text and replaced it with a temporary stub until it can be rewritten without copyvio concerns.--cjllw | TALK 06:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio removal
Category talk:Auks

message: I have recategorized this, it pointed to itself! Now it goes under the "vernacular" :Category: Seabirds. Consequently, extant taxa shoud be categorized a) according to scientific classification (they would initially go into :Category:Alcinae until a genus category such as :Category:Uria is wanted) and b) according to vernacular-name groups such as murrelets, puffins etc (which would all go into :Category:Auks (note that calling Uria "guillemots" is quite incorrect. They are murres; guillemots are strictly speaking the genus Cepphus. But vernacular use is different; so they are also placed in :Category:Guillemots) Dysmorodrepanis 05:20, 8 November 2006 (UTC)