lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dysgenics

message: Uninvolved editors, do you think any of the content from my edit here  should remain? Also, take a look at @Generalrelative's other 29 deletions of user contributions on this page: .
The majority of the stable version page was deleted in this string of edits, which improved aspects the article and removed poor content, but also deleted reliable, sourced information in an apparent POV-push:   BooleanQuackery (talk) 01:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't support re-adding the content. You haven't actually made any case for inclusion, which should be your goal now per WP:ONUS. Some of the smaller edits I'm neutral on, like the lead edit saying that 'cacogenics' is used 'rarely'. Do you have a source for it? I skimmed TFD and couldn't spot it. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are poor quality sources for cacogenics being "rare." I think it's so rare that it doesn't really matter if it's included. BooleanQuackery (talk) 01:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this is an active talk page and discussion has just started, I have removed the "disputed" template as being premature. If you're going to ask such loaded questions in the hope of getting a "yes", the answer is almost always going to be "no" instead. If you want to make a case for each of these changes on their own, with support from specific and reliable sources, do so. Casting aspersions on another editor like this is not persuasive and poisons the well for consensus. Grayfell (talk) 21:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion: re-add the content?
Category talk:Saudi Arabia stubs

message: There are two reasons for adding this stub as well:
# A number of editors of geographical articles search for stubs to expand primarily on the type of item rather than location.
# It is easier for WP:WSS to judge if and when a separate Saudi-geo-stub will be needed. 
Grutness...wha? 07:03, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: MEast-geo-stub
Talk:X-Men: The Last Stand

message: I can't find any video about the wheelchair they used in the X-MEN films with Patrick Stewart. I mean how they made it, a demonstration.
Absolutely nothing till now as I write this comment. If anyone has a link with a video (preferable) or link with photos who built it and how I will appreciate it to write it here. VaioSun (talk) 03:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheelchair
Talk:Bandwidth theft

message: Please edit the link in the below Finland Wikipedia article so it does not take away the bandwidth by linking directly to the image on the server. Wikipedia should not allow bandwidth "theft". Please write this in your rules so that editors do not link to the images on someone else's website or server directly.
https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Che_Guevara
I tried to edit the underlying link at the Vitteet (Reference) # 51 (Text: Banknote.... sivut.... haettu ... 2007) but was unable to because of the language barrier and I don't under stand how it works (double barrier).
/CU107.JPG should be replaced with /cu107.htm
Please confirm. Thank you.
Tomaud (talk) 17:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please edit the link so it does not take away bandwidth by linking directly to the image on the server
Talk:Iron Lad

message: Hi. I was thumbing through Volume 1: Sidekicks of the Young Avengers and it seems as if Iron lad's memory of his time in the past wasn't erased by Wiccan, under the codenmae of Asgardian at the time. Instead, as Wiccan was trying to erase Iron Lad's memory, Iron Lad became angry at Wiccan for trying to make him go back to the future, and thus become Kang the Congueror, and punched Wiccan before he could complete his spell. This shows that Iron Lad's memory wasn't erased. This fact is further supported by Iron lad's last farewell before he goes back to his original place in time. He says something along the lines of having the most fun of his life as a Young Avenger, and then, the very second he finishes speaking, he walks through the Vision's time portal to go back to his original place in time. If Iron Lad's mind was wiped, why did his last words contain information on the Young Avengers, something he shouldn't have remembered. Can anyone shed any light on this subject?
74.225.213.176 00:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iron Lad's memory wipe 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: This article has no information on the character's publication history. It should be added to the article to give it more scope since this article only has the character's fictional biography and a list of his powers and abilities.--Paleface Jack (talk) 15:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Publication History!?
Talk:SystemC

message: Article says,
The performance of this simulation kernel is not to be compared with that of commercial VHDL/Verilog simulators designed to simulate RTL level designs at the present.
Why are they not to be compared? Which one is better?
212.44.20.129 (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity 

message: :"SystemC is applied to system-level modeling,[...]"
What is system-level modeling and what does it mean when something is applied to it? Thanks, --Abdull (talk) 19:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  System-level? 

message: As far as I can see, SystemC lacks a formal semantics. The article states that "The LRM provides the definitive statement of the semantics of SystemC". The LRM is not avaiable to me, so I have a question at the bottom here.
In [1] I read:
:"In this article, a denotational definition of synchronous subset of SystemC is proposed. The subset treated includes modules, processes, threads, wait statement, ports and signals. We propose formal model for System C delta delay. Also, we give a complete semantic definition for the language’s two-phase scheduler. The proposed semantic can constitute a base for validating the equivalence of synchronous HDL subsets."
In [2] I read:
:"In 2009, OSCI developed a User Guide and LRM for the SystemC-AMS 1.0 standard. It defines the execution semantics and extensions to SystemC constructs (classes, interfaces, analog kernel and modeling of continuous-time analysis) for IP modeling of embedded analog/mixed signal systems at system-level, analog behavioral and netlist level."
And in [3] I read:
:"Since SystemC has no formal semantics, this includes a careful encoding of the SystemC scheduler, which has both synchronous and asynchronous features, and a notion of time."
To me it seems like it would be fair to add something in the SystemC article that the basic language does not have any formal sematics. However, work has been done to define formal semantics for subsets of the language. Would this in any way contradict the LRM?
Øyvind Teig (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formal semantics
Talk:Medium machine gun

message: Hmm.  I think you info-bombed some parts of the page there, Ve3.  Also you cut out some appropriate reference material.
It's not a revert candidate by any means, but I think there has to be some happy medium to find here.
Georgewilliamherbert 07:50, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone verify the new information added by 71.131.241.44? Ultimaga | Talk 02:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just reverted.  They conflated the category of Squad Automatic Weapon with Medium Machinegun.  Definite mistake.  SAWs are in increasingly common usage, but that doesn't change the definition of MMG in any way, despite 71.131.241.44's confusion...  Georgewilliamherbert 07:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New info 

message: Isn't MMG pretty much synonymous with GPMG these days? If so, the pages should be merged. If not, notes should be added about how they're different.
They're definitely not the same as a SAW - that's a synonym for LMG!
My hunch is that GPMG is a British/Commonwealth term, and MMG is a USAian term, although i could be wrong.
-- Tom Anderson 2008-01-28 1819 +000  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.81.167 (talk) 18:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The term is largely historical at this point - GPMG is the current one (air cooled, multipurpose design - though a specific unit may be fixed mount, tripod, bipod, etc).  MMG and LMG were the old terms, with water cooling as one differentiator between them.  Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

text: My impression is that the term "medium machine gun" was introduced once heavy machine gun changed its meaning (from denoting rifle-caliber guns to denoting heavier, anti-materiel guns) This probably happened around when M2 .50 cal Browning was introduced. I'll try to find some sourcing. Someone not using his real name (talk) 22:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as a [[General Purpose Machine Gun]]? 

message: Please explain why it is not necessary? Please explain User:GraemeLeggett's revert? --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 11:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The description is of a rifle caliber bullet of around 7.62 mm, the M16 is neither a Medium machine gun, nor of that calibre. If it was the intention to mention smaller calibres such as the 5.56 then that is all that is needed; a wikilink to the M16 serves no purpose but to confuse.GraemeLeggett (talk) 12:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  M 16
Talk:Alex Krycek

message: Should there be a mention that Krycek apparantly had his arm severed but in later seasons it appeared despite this fact? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.187.162.12 (talk) 23:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He has a prosthetic arm. ThirteenOfTwo (talk) 01:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arm 

message: Maybe the name sounds Czech, but, based on my opinion, there is no such Czech family name, at least I've never heard it and was unable to find via Google. As well there is no similar Czech wordstem, which could result in such English spelling. The most similar words could be křeček (hamster) or kříček (in some dialects it can stand for shrublet), but these would be transcribed or transliterated different way. To me, as a native Czech speaker from Moravia, the name sounds Polish or Ukrainian. -- Bohuš  07:54, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krycek's name 

message: Krycek is not the killer of Melissa. The killer of Melissa is a south-american assasin who is killed in the episode Apocrypha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arzachel (talk • contribs) 21:43, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In the article there's not stated that he KILLED her, but that he was probably IN CHARGE of the operation. Expressly stated: "Cardinal, however, accidently mistakes Melissa, Scully's sister, for Scully and kills her..." and "... Krycek, who was presumably in charge of the operation..." ILorbb — Preceding undated comment added 16:05, 27 May 2006‎ (UTC)
True, the article even clearly indicates the name of the killer: Luis Cardinal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.62.136 (talk) 09:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

text: But Melissa is included in Krycek's murder count. -71.61.93.137 (talk) 21:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krycek did not kill Melissa 

message: I reverted the redirect to the MIB article. Krycek is a significant character in the show, appears in several episodes every season and needs his own page. Marikology 04:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: The part about Krycek's imprisonment in the missile silo was incorrect, I included a reference to the control of the Black Oil.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reapermage1990 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Oil

message: "Wheelchair-bound" is considered derogatory usage and should not be reintroduced into the article. Please see List of disability-related terms with negative connotations before reverting this change again. --Vassilissa (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wheelchair-bound"
Talk:Watchtower (band)

message: I've addressed the calls for citations on the page and have accordingly removed the the WP:V tag.  
It is true that the information on the page is a mirror of the Metal Archives page.  I will hopefully find time to attempt a re-write shortly (or may succumb to the fate of the Wiki user above who made a similar claim three years ago - we all know it goes.) Colinclarksmith (talk) 19:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations disclaimer removed; addressing plagiarism issue 
Talk:Jumbotron

message: The Sony site uses a capital T: JumboTron. See, for example, http://www.sony.net/Fun/SH/1-36/h2.html (image caption). Candy 18:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tron vs. tron 

message: Does Sony still make Jumbotron displays?--BigMac1212 17:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sony in LED Display business?

message: This link, http://catalog2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ModelDetail?storeId=11201&catalogId=13051&modelNo=ASTROVISION, leads to an error page at Panasonic. 4.243.227.135 07:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Link

message: There are references in-text, and at one point the page says "6 sided octagonal JumboTron" - absurd! I'm going to clean this thing up as best I can, because it really needs it. Cheeser1 22:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious clean up

message: I think the picture of hte ABC video display shouldbe removed because it is offensive to christians, particularly Catholics, because of hte wording on it.
people are unable to see the context or complete sentence  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.138.245 (talk) 12:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Offensive Picture

message: Please do not add back the advertising for Imago products. Wikipedia is not a place for advertising. Bongomatic 11:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertizing 

message: The design section states to begin with that a Jumbotron is a very large VFD, later that it consists of small CRTs. As this, to my knowledge, is two different technologies a bit clearance on the design would be appreciated
:Fixed. You are correct, VFD and CRT technologies are different. 71.119.73.233 (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRT or VFD? 

message: I know they're rather rare in collecting circles, but does anyone happen to have one (or a set of three) of the early CRT sub-pixels that they can upload a photo of? 71.119.73.233 (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRT Sub-Pixels 

message: Hi, I'm trying to reorganize this page so that its easier to navigate. I don't plan to change any images. Mmunderwood (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Restructuring for clarity

message: A jumbotron, sometimes referred to as Jumbovision, is a large-screen television using technology.
Does anyone have an idea what this was supposed to say?  This is a question using technology.  :P  A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 04:44, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd first line 

message: It's a new 2023 venue built in a two-sided jumbotron. B137 (talk) 04:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Las Vegas Sphere]]?
Talk:Dobok

message: Bok (복; 服) doesn't mean "robe" and it most definitely doesn't mean "training clothes" as the article suggests. It simply means "clothing." I've removed these mistakes from the article --Bentonia School (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bok 

message: Just want to let you know, the photo that is posted is completely wrong as an example of an ITF dobok. The official ITF Dobok is the Sasung Brand; No person may compete at an official ITF competition unless they are wearing a Sasung Dobok...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.158.152.209 (talk) 08:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction
Talk:The Art of War (Machiavelli book)

message: Thanks to Weitman, for enhancing and cleaning up this article.
Cheers, sir! :)--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 08:57, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: While it's true The Art of War is fairly obscure today, historically it was a very important and influential work.  Makers of Modern Strategy listed Machiavelli as the reinventor of military strategy and the book was widely translated across Europe within decades of publication.  We should consider rewording the first sentence to reflect the historical importance of the book, rather than it's present obscurity. 65.182.233.83 (talk) 00:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lesser-read"
Talk:Discourses on Livy

message: This article cries out for expansion. The Discourses are a much longer and more complex work than The Prince. In fact I would go so far to say one has not truly read Machiavelli until one has read The Discourses.
--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 09:07, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means, do.  --RJC Talk 14:14, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hear, hear!  If I have some time sometime, I'll try to give this at least a cursory expansion.  The Discourses is complex and full of subtle ironies, and this Wikipedia article as it stands is a pitiful treatment.  --jacobolus (t) 07:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:MultiLevel Recording

message: Where can I buy ML drives and discs? There should be at least working prototypes somewhere, I think. Henri Tapani Heinonen 09:40, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ML drives?

message: Working prototypes were demonstrated at several trade shows, but good luck in finding one.  My guess is they ended up in storage somewhere in Silicon Valley (think of the ending scene from Raiders of the Lost Ark).  Joe Newman 17:10, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: There were working prototypes

message: I added this section because the article really needed a picture showing what ML is. Here's a critique of my own contribution in case it inspires others:
* The ML marks in the diagram are so colorful as to be confusing.  Unfortunately in plain grayscale, they were difficult to distinguish by eye.
* The facts are personal knowledge; I didn't do a good job referencing them.
* Can it be proved that "the technique had not been seriously pursued in data storage prior to Calimetrics"?
Spiel496 02:35, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Technology section

message: Is HD-Burn at all related to ML?  From Sanyo's page http://www.digital-sanyo.com/BURN-Proof/HD-BURN, it doesn't sound like it.
: It's not ML, but I suppose it is related. The Calimetric ML CD-R format incorporates three techniques: smaller pits (600nm vs 830nm), more efficient error correction (RS vs CISC) and, of course, MultiLevel modulation (8 levels vs. 2).  As I understand it, HD-Burn is just the first two techniques without ML. Summary Spiel496 04:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sanyo's HD-Burn
Talk:Nelson Mandela 70th Birthday Tribute

message: Is anyone here who has the complete songlist of this concert? Melly42 09:57, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Songlist

message: A huge thank you to whoever wrote this page ... EmjayE2 (talk) 14:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Thank you

message: Can anybody explain U2 not taking part? They were rumoured, if not confirmed, to be in the line up originally and it was the sort of 'cause' you would have expected them to support. Throughout the day the crowd chanted "How long to sing this song", lyrics from U2's song 40. Eventually compere Lenny Henry had to tell everyone that they definitely wouldn't be there!
Just interested, that's all.  Roybus (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  U2 

message: Why is there an entire article on a single concert?203.184.41.226 (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: This article has inaccuracies (especially about the origins of the concert which came after, and out of, years of anti-apartheid activity and concerts) including that the concert was in fact funded by the Anti-Apartheid Movement (UK).  It appears to have been lifted from this website http://tonyhollingsworth.com/index.php?q=content/nelson-mandela-70th-birthday-tribute  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.193.140 (talk) 08:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARCplc70U0g
U can see that Fry & Laurie are before Tracy Chapman  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.113.82 (talk) 08:52, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of apearance is wrong

message: Hi, just going off of the article, and a pre-familiarity with Tracey Chapman's music, shouldn't the list of "political songs which received resonance" include Talkin' Bout a Revolution, since she sang it when this launched her career. Or it's also possible that the list only includes the planned song list? Because I believe she was only supposed to perform Fast Car and then TBAR was the impromptu choice when Stevie Wonder walked out. 72.190.201.230 (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding "Talkin' Bout a Revolution" to the Resonant Song List?
Talk:Coddling

message: Coddling is the same as poaching, isn't? Shouldn't this page just redirect to the poaching page?
:As far as I can tell, food is coddled in a container; eggs just happen to come pre-equipped with one.    VermillionBird 00:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poaching 

message: Removed the section titled "Cooking examples". It mentioned Caesar salad and salmonella, so the title was kind of peculiar.  Anyway, salmonella is covered in the coddled eggs article, and the fact that coddled eggs are a traditional ingredient in Caesar salad is covered in that article. In this article, it just seemed like an attempt to pad a bare article. Richigi (talk) 23:58, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section