lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Diniyar Bilyaletdinov

message: The article links to a Russian language article that supposedly verifies Bilyaletdinov's Tatar ethnicity. He may well be Tatar, but the article--which I ran through a translation program, as I do not read/speak Russian--mentions his ancestry only in a summary box. I don't doubt the subject's ethnicity, but this is a poor citation. Rolando (talk) 19:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree. I'm sure it's true but a better source is needed. Spiderone 08:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

text: So Shaquille O'Neal is Irish then? This isn't always true. How do you know he wasn't adopted by Tatars? He doesn't look particularly non-Russian. Then again Renat Yanbayev and Marat Izmailov have blond hair and blue eyes. Explain. Spiderone 08:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Without a reliable source it cannot be included, particularly as it concerns a living person in the UK, home of libel tourism. Bilyaletdinov may be a Tatar name, but we do not know whether he, or any of his ancestors, were adopted, for instance. It's not even that important anyway. Dancarney (talk) 00:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: who cares what nationality he is? only racist clowns from wikipedia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.23.69.206 (talk) 05:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Весьма и весьма толсто. Dude, before writing a comment, study the difference between race and nationality, will you? Now that you're banned, go troll elsewhere. Gleb Toropchin (talk) 10:54, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnicity
Talk:Moy, County Tyrone

message: The page (at 3rd Jan 07) says Moy town square "was inspired by the square at Marengo in Lombardy".  Can this be clarified please.  I was taught it was based on the centre of Armagh Trenwith 10:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:American Woodmark

message: I think a more comprehensive listing of the product line is necessary, but how much more?
There are only a few styles of doors, a few types of wood, and about a dozen colors (also note that not every door comes in every color). Should there be a complete listing, or just something that lists every door style, color and species available?
Your thoughts? Pandemic 10:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

message: How is it not notable when it's traded on the Nasdaq, and employs thousands of people in the U.S. manufacturing sector?  --207.255.199.12 (talk) 05:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the notability issue?
Talk:Words and Music (Jimmy Webb album)

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this review. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the professional reviews section. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (favorable) 2008Asst. Editor, Crawdaddy! FenderRhodesScholar | Talk 19:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Mandelbrot Competition

message: I have removed the proposed deletion tag because I think this one should go to AfD. Actually, I think this article does pass the notability test - around 75 high schools have entered teams in the 2006/2007 competition, and there is a published book of past problems from the competition . Gandalf61 10:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed proposed deletion tag
Talk:Rods and Cones (song)

message: Whoever is putting "the" before Blue Man Group: it is incorrect; the group is officially referred to without the word "the" before it. Thank you. Ianthegecko 04:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" Blue Man Group 
Talk:Ivan Saenko

message: OK, this does not pass WP:RS, but I'm mentioning it in case the info gets added without corroboration. According to a reader comment on the Aviation Herald article on the accident that befell RusAir Flight 243, Saenko was one of the 44 casualties. If this can be confirmed by a reliable source, such as ITAR-TASS, RIAN etc, then the info can go into the article.
:That post at Aviation Herald also stated that Vladimir Pettai was killed, which is confirmed by ITAR-TASS, this gives weight to the claim, but it still needs confirmation. Mjroots (talk) 14:51, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This official list of passengers give Igor Petrovich Sayenko as a casualty. Given the lack of noise from elsehwere, I think we can safely state that Ivan Sayenko was not on the accident aircraft. Mjroots (talk) 09:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Death needs confirmation
Talk:Banksia acanthopoda

message: Bookmark for checking later....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Banksia aurantia

message: ...the noun is missing: "sinuses"?Wetman (talk) 02:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant "lobes" - kinda the glass (or leaf margin) half full/half empty thing. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "deep pointed narrow [  ]"
Talk:Lion Air Flight 538

message: I'm not entirely sure why, but it seems that for many years this article stated that the aircraft known as "PK-LMN" (a Lion Air McDonnell Douglas MD-82) crashed whilst operating Flight 538. This would appear to be incorrect 1, 2, 3, and the flight number was 583. This page was originally moved some months ago, but links to it from other pages were not updated. I've done that now. Just noting here that there do appear to be some sources which use (what would appear to be) the incorrect number and I'm not sure whether this was as a result of this Wikipedia article or incorrect reporting in the media, so I'd appreciate any info on this. Thanks, 72 (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, since there's been a resent surge of moves on this page, lets get all the information I can find on the flight number.
*Tempo, "Lion Air Terpeleset di Solo, 10 Tewas", published November 30, 2004: 538
*Suara Merdeka, "Lion Air Nyungsep di Solo, 23 Tewas", published December 1, 2004: 538
*Sydney Morning Herald, "31 killed in Indonesian plane crash", published December 1, 2004: 583
No other news article used as a source on this article mentions the flight number. Here are some more news articles I could find.
*China Daily, "At least 15 dead in Indonesia plane crash", published November 30, 2004: 583 (Another China Daily article on December 1 says the same.)
*Detik, "Korban Tewas Lion Air 23 Orang", published November 30, 2004: 538 (Another Detik article on December 1 says the same.)
*Liputan6, "Berita Kecelakaan Lion Air Hari Ini", published November 30, 2004: 538
I think it's worth noting how most sources using 583 are in English, while most that are using 538 are in Indonesian.
Weirdly, the KNKT doesn't appear to have anything on the accident on their website. But the next best thing, an NTSB narrative, uses 538. ASN uses 583.
Personally, based on its use by Indonesian news outlets and the NTSB, I think 538 may be the correct number. The best source using 583 is ASN, but even ASN has gotten flight numbers wrong before. Still, I think finding something from the KNKT would be the best way to clear up this confusion.ThatFlyingSquid (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight number? 

message: According to the Aviation Safety Network's accident description and the Indonesian version of this article. There were actually 163 occupants on board the aircraft (156 passengers, but still seven crew members). The number of fatalities is still the same (25 fatalities), but the number of survivors is 156 (the number of injuries is also 156 meaning that all the survivors were injured). Could the information that stated that there were 153 occupants (146 passengers and seven crew members) be initial reports? Tigerdude9 (talk) 17:44, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ammount of occupants
Talk:Astrology in Hellenistic Egypt

message: The reference to Rameses VI as Ozymandias is contradicted in the article Ozymandias where it refers to Rameses II as having this name on his statue's inscription. In the interest of consistency I'm taking the brackets reference to Ozy out in a couple of days unless anyone disagrees. Julia Rossi 11:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Ramesses VI date in the article was out so I replaced the corrected date: 1143 - 1136BC. Now I feel the pharoah is not the one connected to this claim about astrology. Amenotep III or his son Amenotep IV (aka Akhenaten) may suit the astrology interest profile but again the dates are earlier still. Do you really mean Ramesses II? perhaps. Confusing so I just corrected the date and removed the Ozymandias assert since it belongs to Ramesses II. Julia Rossi 00:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date query

message: Nechepsos is reportedly an obscure pharoah reigning only six years, in the late 600's bc and the priest Petosiris is from the 450's so this attribution, ie horoscopic astrology, needs verifying. Cheers Julia Rossi 10:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution query 

message: I've released the point made about Virgo in the embedded comment "Commented b/c Nidaba was not an Egyptian goddess. Her WP article says she was Sumerian." It's interesting and a bit lost there but don't know who contributed. Julia Rossi (talk) 07:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Releasing Virgo
Talk:Old Age Pensions Act 1908

message: this article is confused and mistaken. it states that the lords blocked this bill which was passed only in 1911. what nonsense! if so why is it not called the 1911 pensions act the article is based upon a similarly wrong entry on the spartacusnet which I think makes this claim on sectarian grounds, it also claim sthat the labour party forced the liberal hands in this legislation. I have checked in gdh cole and r postgate the common people r miliband parliamentary socialism and g dangerfield the strange death of liberal england  none of which mention the house of lords blocking this law Darren redstar 11:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Contrary to my edit summary, it was the People's Budget that was opposed. I have removed this section. MRSC • Talk 10:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: People's Budget
Talk:Ferretti Group

message: Hi everyone, while reading the article I noticed that some contents of the "History" section could have been improved and deepened. I have therefore worked on translating some contents from the Italian corresponding version of the article, which seem to flow better.
You can have a look at the proposal in the box below, where I have crossed out the redundant and/or impossible-to-verify passages and highlighted  the paragraphs and the references that I would suggest integrating. What do you think? Thank you very much in advance for your help --CateSof1453! (talk) 13:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello everyone, it's been a while since the submission of the proposal, but I have not received any opinions yet. I think, however, that I may soon start updating the "History" section with the integration of the translation, which seems to me to contain only objective information, without any controversial passages.--CateSof1453! (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation proposal to improve the content of the "History" section
Talk:Banksia alliacea

message: I believe such a photo would greatly enhance the article LiPollis (talk) 06:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A photo of the actual plant in bloom would be nice 

message: I can find no reference to this common name in connection with Banksia alliacea. The article Banksia pteridifolia also gives "tangled honeypot" as the common name. Gderrin (talk) 02:54, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tangled honeypot?
Talk:Stockwell Garage

message: This sentence (in the first paragraph) is clearly a personal recollection, not usually allowed by Wikipedia:
'I worked as a trainee draughtsman for A E BEER in the latter Fifties and it was common knowledge that the BEER engineer who had taken head responsibility for this pioneering engineering project was an elderly Scot named JOHN SMITH'. 
I was tempted to delete the sentence, as the source of the data is unverifiable. But it seems to contain an important historical link to the name of the original designer of the Stockwell Garage. So how can this wording be modified to fit in with Wikipedia's rules? Boy.bowen (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text moved from article 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Stockwell Bus Garage 1, London, UK - Diliff.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 11, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-08-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Stockwell Bus Garage 1, London, UK - Diliff.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: The article does not do justice to the building. The roof is a concrete shell structure. This kind of structure was "pioneered" by the architect Pier Luigi Nervi. The building is remarkable because of the size of the area which is covered without any supporting columns a considerable feat of engineering at the time of it's construction. Petergans (talk) 07:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  concrete shell
Talk:GBDE

message: I think stating the size as 2048 bits is inaccurate. It consists of a 128 bit salt and a 2048 bit lookup table, which means the key size is 2176 bits in total. (At most 256 bits of that is used for generating each sector key). Kasperd 11:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, good point. I think you're confusing "sector key" with "key-key", though; see my post below. -- intgr 13:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Master key size
Talk:Freeboating

message: I've never heard this term used for describing freestyle kayaking. Is this something brand new, or is it specific to a certain clique or country? Seek writ awe there (talk) 14:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Freeboating?
Talk:List of St Helens R.F.C. coaches

message: According to saints.org.uk, Emlyn Jenkins "held the coaching reigns at St.Helens from 1950-52, until succeeded by fellow-Welshman Jim Sullivan in June 1952", but this doesn't appear to correlate with this article, any thoughts? Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 20:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Emlyn Jenkins]]
Talk:Wild One (Johnny O'Keefe song)

message: Same song. Richhoncho (talk) 18:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[The Wild One (song)]] 

message: The opening paragraph has the sentence "writer credits on subsequent versions often omit Withers" but there is no mention of any such claim, only in giving it airplay. Doug butler (talk) 20:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non sequitur 

message: The fact that its writer Chapman, an Australian, was heavily inspired by O'Keefe's song is beyond argument.  But to state it is one and the same song is just plain incorrect. JohnbRoberts (talk) 17:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suzi Quatro's 'The Wild One'
Talk:Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations

message: I have edited this controversial section that makes unsubstantiated claims - see edit war on Labshare Labshare
from
"The department assisted in the commercialization of Australian remote laboratories in higher education, injecting more than $3,800,000 into the sector, supporting a Government-granted monopoly by way of the Labshare cartel to the Australian Technology Network universities, University of South Australia, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Curtin University of Technology and Queensland University of Technology." 
to
"The department assisted in the commercialization of Australian remote laboratories in higher education, injecting funds into the sector, supporting the foundation of the Labshare project." 
paragraph (to me) reads as non-controversial and a lot more neutral.Alxxthegeek (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funding of Labshare 
Talk:Terrace Motorway Tunnel

message: About who changed the info I put in about tidal flow: You got one fact right, it was found to be unsafe in the tunnel link investigation, but it seems to be going ahead anyway. Look in the draft regional land transport strategy - thats whats in there. (theres still time to make submissions about it btw)
60.234.226.244 12:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chung Ling High School

message: WHERE THE HECK IS THE ARTICLE?? SOMEONE DELETED IT???
Yes, someone did delete it. We are currently requesting for information. Stkhoo 16:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: I've tagged the article for copyvio as some section was copied. If you would like to visit the article or edit it, see Talk:Chung Ling High School/Temp. Regards, NgYShung huh? 09:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio notice

message: There is no indication that the choir is independently notable and lacks citations to independent sources. As an alternative to deletion, it can be mentioned here in the school article. MB 21:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean that you do not concur so I shall refactor you comment especially as you are the article creator. --Dom from Paris (talk) 14:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of [[Chung Ling High School Choir]] 

message: Please have a read, "Schoolcruft is a phenomenon which appears on Wikipedia when editors who are passionate and enthusiastic about a particular school, generally one they are either a current or recent student of, feel the impulse over a protracted period of time to share their passion with us, their audience, by creating a mini-shrine to their institution of learning and, in fact, almost anything relating to said institution, on Wikipedia."
We don't put school songs and anthems in school articles, this has been consistently applied across WP.LibStar (talk) 07:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Schoolcruft]]
Talk:Diary of a Madman (Lu Xun)

message: I just bought a bilingual version of this story on Amazon, translated by Paul Meighan. Is his introduction copied from this article, or does this article copy from his introduction? Either way the lack of attribution bothers me. 97.126.0.95 (talk) 07:14, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism?
Talk:Kong Yiji

message: Much praise to  for this rich and useful article. I made some minor but important revisions, however. For instance, this is a short-story, since a "novel" is a longer form, Yuan Shikai only attempted to become emperor, the exam system was ended in 1905, not in the New Culture Movement.
Another point is that the word "feudal" is misleading to readers not familiar with the usage in China, where it is not a technical term but actually only means "old" or "traditional." Scholars have established that late imperial China was not "feudal," which is a term imposed on Chinese history and distorts it by using Western concepts and values. 
Many thanks, again, for your hard work and patience!ch (talk) 16:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Ode to Gallantry

message: * 'Wiped out' the previous summary of the plot because it's too detailed and really unnecessary. I'll try working out a new one like those for the other Jinyong novels soon. (see Flying Fox of Snowy Mountain, The Book and the Sword).
* Added a list of main characters with no description
* Changed the adaptations section. Some of the info there is translated from the Chinese version.
Lonelydarksky (talk) 02:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: References are needed, if information is inferred from the original text. In this case, secondary sources are required. See here for more details. _LDS (talk) 07:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit summary as of 16th March 2009 by [[User:Lonelydarksky|Lonelydarksky]]
Talk:The Book and the Sword

message: When I read this book, several years ago, I was under the impression that the tribe was Uygur.  Here it states Hui and, originally, a parenthetical (Uygur) but the Hui page states that Hui is specifically not Uygur.  I changed it to Hui--just because that seemed to have been the consensus view, but I'm not sure if it's correct and I don't have a copy of the book in front of me to check. Elijahmeeks 17:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hui or Uygur?
Talk:Clarke Island (Tasmania)

message: Below deleted:
Clarke Island has the distinction of being the largest island of the largest island (Cape Barren Island) of the largest island (Flinders Island) of the largest island (Tasmania) of the largest island (Australia).
Seems like a made-up distinction. Where do we draw the line between island and continent? Seems like world wide there could be many similar "disctions". WP is not the place to list them. Format (talk) 08:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete [[Original research]]
Talk:Dave Gilbert (game designer)

message: Since Gilbert has started producing and publishing games by other designers, I feel like there needs to be a Wadjet Eye Games article. I don't think that there's a need for Dave Gilbert AND Wadjet Eye Games articles, though, so I propose that this article be moved to Wadjet Eye Games (currently a redirect) and expanded to cover games like Resonance, which Wadjet Eye only published, rather than developed. Any thoughts or objections? Euchrid (talk) 03:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to Wadjet Eye Games