Talk:Rankin/Bass Productions

message: Not a Rankin/Bass production!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.97.18.43 (talk) 22:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Witch's Night Out

message: Reads like a fanpage - need cleanup. Davodd 02:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: didn't seem that bad to me. I cleaned up the "rankin/bass today" section, renamed "along came rudolph" section to just "rudolph", and removed the npov and cleanup tags. -- Akb4 19:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fanpage

message: No mention of the principal designer for most of the classic Christmas specials? DarkAudit 19:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Coker, Jr.? 

message: I think it'd be good if the cel animated and stop-motion animated productions were differentiated. -- Akb4 19:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  production list split 

message: I can understand wanting to keep the 1975 Rankin/Bass logo to help in the description of this article, but why remove the other logos (including the 1966 Videocraft logo) when they are just as useful in describing the company's history? Starbuck-2 21:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rankin/Bass logos 

message: :Image:Rudolph.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rudolph.jpg

message: Is there any proof of this upcoming "Jolly Old Saint Nicholas" Christmas Special or is this a rumor created by a fan?
Verification is a high standard on this site, rumors are not.--Ace Darville (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Verify 

message: An image used in this article, File:Rankin-bass-1969.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Rankin-bass-1969.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Did Rankin/Bass Productions co-produced the 1999 animated film with Morgan Creek Productions and Nest Entertainment?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.95.53.89 (talk) 02:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The King and I

message: Who owns the rights to That Girl in Wonderland, DreamWorks Animation/DreamWorks Classics or Warner Bros.? 24.180.56.157 (talk) 22:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership of ''That Girl in Wonderland''