lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jeep Hurricane

message: The article has been revised for a more neutral POV. Should the advertisement indicator be removed?
: Looks fine to me. I don't see why not. --Bky1701 21:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to remove the notice, but then I realized there is nothing about the vehicle other than a discussion of its strengths and "most fun" award. Can someone perhaps add info on why it's not about to enter production? --Orthografer 18:44, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

text: That and the fact that it has two hemis and all the complicated steering would drive up the price to the point where the few that could be sold still wouldn't cover the production/development costs.  It might have been released for production if it were made by some specialty company but DC is more concerned about mass production and mass sales.  The previous is all speculation on my part though, I have no sources to back this up but it seems logical to me.  Dismas|(talk) 09:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement? 

message: I fixed the article so it doesn't read like a manufacture's car brochure (or advertisement, which is not allowed), plus added references. I also added a better pic of the Hurricane.IG-2000 07:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Advertisement layout style 

message: Less an advert, but still like a press release. Repetition, speculation and unencyclopedic phrasing. I've had a go:
*Monocoque/unitary construction is currently the normal style of car construction, and has been for decades.
*Retaining Jeep's traditional grille is not noteworthy, and in any case it is evident from the pictures.
* Modified 'mode of entry' explanation, removing 'Dukes of Hazzard' reference.
I was tempted to remove one of the last two images, as being too similar to one another. Centrepull (talk) 02:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still messy
Talk:Fayez Banihammad

message: I tagged this GA, even though it's short, because not much else is known about him. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 18:15, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: بني (bny) means "sons of" in Arabic and حمد (ḥmd) is just a name. You could transliterate this as "Banihammad", "Bani Hamad", "Beni Hammad", "Beni-Hamad", or any other combination of the above. There are, unfortunately, quite a few "standard" ways of transliterating Arabic. —Gabbe 07:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Appreciate the quick response, I wasn't aware "bani" shared a root with "ben/bin", so that makes a bit more sense, though I still find it odd nobody's ever been transliterated this way Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 07:54, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2005

message: I'm afraid I must disagree with User:Quadell's assessment, the article has almost no references outside of two things near the bottom, as far as anybody not involved in writing the article can tell, almost everything may just be compleatly made up. This is clearly not a well-referenced article. Homestarmy 17:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted GA
Talk:Isshin Kurosaki

message: And then, I grabbed a pic of him in his shinigami form from a manga scan, but I'm new to editing and such, and not sure how to make it in a panel on the side.  The image is there if someone could help me out with that.
:It's a nice picture, but I'm a bit concerned about the fact that it is his main picture.  It seems like a picture of him in shinigami form as one of the first things you see on the page would be a huge spoiler for anyone who hadn't gotten that far in the series.  When I first open the page, the first thing I notice is the profile picture, I'm just saying maybe the picture should be under Character Outline or History where you can see the Spoiler Warning. (???) Seamoos 10:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted it to the older image again. I don't care about it being a spoiler, but the newer version is hideous. I mean, what is he doing with his mouth? He looks like a muppet or something. Plus the colour quality is bad as well. --tjstrf talk 15:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the old pic is better, especially in the sense that it doesn't give away the spoiler of him being a Shinigami, but I didn't raise a point about this because it's still spoiled in that his name is listed under Shinigami in the character lists at the bottom of Bleach character pages.67.135.15.12 17:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shinigami Image

message: So is his body a Gigai or is it a real body? Did they ever expalin that? This would mean that people in gigais are capable of having kids --Lego3400:  The Sage of Time 17:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would require he start as a human, die, and then repossess his real body. Seeing as he's not a living skeleton, that doesn't seem too likely. --erachima formerly tjstrf 08:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gigai? 

message: Is this guy a pervert, or did I see a bad Sub of the episode with the Grand Fisher in it, it was where the family went to vist there mothers grave.  The Dad did a Slide past his Daughter, and I think looked up her skirt and said " Hmmm Poca-dots " he was then kicked in the face by his other daughter.
:He's not a pervert, he's just out of his fucking mind. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persona 

message: Does Ichigo ever realise that this is his father? Or am I wrong? If I am right do you know if it has been released in the anime? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.19.105.251 (talk • contribs).
:Yes, Ichigo does know that Isshin is his father. I don't think he knows that he's a shinigami yet, though--$UIT 03:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ichigo doesn't know that his father was/is a shinigami too. It has been many times made fun of how poor Ichigo is in sensing Reiatsu (in shinigami cup golden mostly), but also in quite a few of the anime episodes, though this might just be because of lack of training since he was able to pick up spirit threads (forgot the japanese name) in few of the first ~30 episodes.--Petrim 16:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Does Ichigo know
Talk:A Very Brady Christmas

message: Which network did this movie originally air on? If it was ABC, they'd use that "Rainbow Split" thing. If it was NBC, they'd use the "Vertical Star Tunnel". If it was CBS, it's the "CBS Theater Crawl" (my nickname for those CBS words crawling across the screen). 71.111.215.224 23:15, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Network
Talk:Govind Ballabh Pant Engineering College

message: can we get the history of college from somewhere??
where did the logo go. we can put a college logo. it wont violate a copyright law. --Flyingdeath (talk) 18:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Actor model and process calculi history

message: I don't see any reason to put this article in one category and not the other.  After this article is the history of their mutual influence and co-evolution.  Regards,--Carl Hewitt 18:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Process calculi]] '''and''' [[:Category:Actor model]]

message: This article may perhaps be read as a list of arguments of why the actor model is perhaps considered "better" than the one(s) it is compared against.
Searching for the word "problematic" it turns up below this heading only: "The 1978 version of CSP differed from the Actor model in the following respects [Clinger 1981]": The problems seem to be related to CSP only.
I find it somewhat strange that in a history article of "actor vs?/and? process calculi", that the actor model should come out on the pro side only, or at least, the compared with - so much in the "problematic". 
–Øyvind Teig (talk) 18:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Questioning the neutrality of this article
Talk:Kat

message: ----
I'm going to redirect this name to Cat and merge this page to Cat (disambiguation). --User:Arual 15:16, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Why, of all the hundreds of people named "Kat", are these four the only ones here?  We should either add all articles about someone named "Kat", eliminate those here who are known by more than that one word, or start a new disambiguation page called "Kat (name)". Chrisrus (talk) 22:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why so few people? 

message: 2×45 82.29.115.190 (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maths
Talk:Michael Witzel

message: The distinguished Indian archaeologist B.B. Lal pointed out that Witzel incorrectly translated a well-known passage and hung a whole story on this passage to push his pet theory. He was so upset by the lack of ethics shown by Witzel that he titled his paper "Should One Give up All Ethics for Promoting One's Theory?" Here's a link: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29757583?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
More of similar unethical behavior is summarized in Agarwal's paper that appeared in Journal of Indo-European Studies, Vol. 31, No.1-2: pp.107-185, 2003: http://www.jies.org/Discussion/MichaelWitzel.pdf 
LogicalistAnalyst (talk) 02:12, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: BB Lal pursues one travesty of a scholarship (and I am being mild). Even, if his allegations are true, it will be a case of pot calling the kettle, black. ~ Winged BladesGodric 19:41, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

text: And, V. Aggarwal, seriously?!  ~ Winged BladesGodric 19:44, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, well, JIES put it up on their web site in the interest of fairness. They made a mistake, obviously. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Translations and Related Matter 

message: Does Witzel not know that, in India, it is the "Gondwana" myths that rule the day? The "Laurasian" myths are dead! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Laurasia" and "Gondwana" 

message: Michael Witzel's article is filled with extremely misleading summaries that portray him as a massive critic of hindu sectarianism. While it may be somewhat accurate, it's a bit misleading since Witzel has also made it clear that against all forms of sectarianism and not hindu sectarianism specifically. Also, there's far too much attention given to him regarding the california textbook controversy which again somewhat gives a misleading impression of him. I have some changes I would like to make and just wanted to inform everyone. If they have an issue my edits they can bring it up under this headline. Krao212 (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for changes to be added to the article
Talk:Frank Cremeans

message: Can we get some kind of source or verification for the claim that Cremeans died from AIDS complications? He was known as an outspoken homophobe. That added to his comments about AIDS certainly would make for an ironic fate. However, is it true? Apparently, this tidbit was added anonymously on Dec. 11. Acsenray 18:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gaetano Mosca

message: Got started on this article Dec. 15.  I'll be adding sections on his political philosophy and intend to fill out secondary references etc.
Jim 18:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Started
Talk:TNA Against All Odds

message: A new story has been posted in a tempory TNA Against All Odds Page.
:Where? Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:43, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Although it's unofficial, TNA recognizes him, so shouldn't we?Freebird Jackson 16:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He will be put in after the match (right below the result of the match). So it will look something like this:
*Wrestler A defeated Wretler B to win/retain the NWA World Heavyweight Championship
**Wrestler A pinned/forced Wrestler B to submit.
**Samoa Joe was the unofficial outside enforcer. TJ Spyke 00:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I was wondering about the policy on that.Freebird Jackson 14:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Joe as enforcer

message: If Samoa joe is the special enforcer does he get both the 5 year contract and Title Shot at destination X? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.155.99.200 (talk • contribs) 
:It's just a storyline (I doubt he really has a 5 year contract since that is really long for a wrestling contract), but yes he gets those. TJ Spyke 01:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title Shot For Joe

message: According to  Lethal regained the championship.  Is this true, or did he just take the belt?  I am not watching the show, so I don't know what was said.  LessThanClippers (talk) 03:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The stipulation was that whoever got the pinfall would be the X Division Champion. TNA's site confirmes Lethal is the new champ:  ("Black Machismo and The Motor City Machineguns beat Team 3D and Johnny Devine to save the X Division. Machismo also regained the X Division Championship.") TJ Spyke 04:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: lethal x division champ

message: TJ you kinda shot yourself in the foot there, cos we all knew who it was, thats why we added it. But at least you can source it 83.100.234.145 (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is "we"? The woman is a total unknown (unless you live in the Louisville area where OVW has a weekly TV show). I did not shoot myself in the foot, I was following the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia (see WP:V about why unsourced info will be deleted). TJ Spyke 02:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The match had not been announced when I deleted it. When I added the match, it was after it had been announced on iMPACT and on TNA's website. TJ Spyke 02:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Steiners Match
Talk:Tihar (festival)

message: Word Tihar is similar to Tyohar of Hindi. Is there an Etymological link? Chirags 18:30, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tihar - Tyohar 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... (This Article has been moved from Tihar for possible Vandalism) --Manzil Paudar (talk) 14:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: Tihar 103.94.253.67 (talk) 12:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Flyway

message: Think this needs to be split into two pages, one of the term and one for the mag.  Either that or make it totally on the mag, move fly way to wikitionary, and mention it in the mag's artile.  What do you think?--Rayc 18:34, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think flyway could remain in Wikipedia, but it requires elaboration.  There are a number of specific flyways that should be discussed (pacific, etc.), as well as the effects on flyways caused by changing ecosystems.  It seems to me that a disambiguation page is not necessary seeming that there is only one alternative posted so far.  The magazine name could be posted at the base of the flyway article.  I will work on the flyway piece this weekend. --Agape negates fear 18:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?
Talk:Graybird

message: {{}} Hey, is there any way to get rid of these virus'? Some may remember me as Flameturret on the Battle.net page. I am accesing a school 
COMPUTER SO TRY TO BE UNDERSTANDING. IT'S ABOUT TO BE THE WEEKEND AND I HAVE TO ACCESS NEXT MONDAY SO DON'T EXPECT A REPLY till then.
 I need help. I don't want to format my computer...
   
             163.150.15.246 18:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:House party

message: Dear critic,
Please feel free to share your thoughts here on the POV you mentioned in your edit. Folajimi 01:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I vote Do Not Merge.  House concerts and house parties are very different things. Dubc0724 17:55, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Merge
Talk:Non-apology apology

message: The article is fine as documentation of a modern English expression, but makes debatable  factual statements in Wikivoice about what does and does not constitute a proper apology.  The idea that a true apology should be forthright, specific, personally address the victim, take responsibility, and other similar assumptions in the article are part of a Western, possibly Christian and particularly Anglo/American outlook.  There are places and cultures where, for example, directness and specificity are not considered as necessary or preferable in order for an apology to perform its social function.  Or where paying money is considered full and sufficient atonement (even for serious crimes). Sesquivalent (talk) 10:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture dependent; Western and particularly American/Anglo 

message: It's a very controversial case, probably a somewhat sensible subject to some audience, but it's actually a pacified academic discussion. You can find the official letter on the Catholic Church website, she does not claim that it is an apology (don't forget that the Church is God's Will on Earth, it's impossible to be wrong). It's very clear in the Letter, it even claims that they saved more souls and provided more "fair" judgements than the bloody-thirsty Protestant Inquisition, basically saying they did more good than bad, a real non-apology example. I'm sure there's something in theology talking about it, but I can't remember any author. It's still not known why most people believes that the Church apologized for the Inquisition Big Butt Princess (talk) 08:17, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pope John Paul II's Letter of (non-)Apology for the Inquisition 

message: What’s it called when someone at first appears to apologize sincerely but tacks on at the end that the wrongdoing was out of the speaker’s control. 107.127.42.129 (talk) 19:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another type of apology
Talk:Kratovo

message: This article needs a disambig. page as this si also the name of a town and province in Macedonia.
--Aelfthrytha 19:00, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 19:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed titles at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 14:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 April 2022
Talk:TNA Victory Road

message: A new story has been posted in a Victory Road temporary page.
:Where? Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:44, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005

message: Why are there not any allowed?--Yugioh73036 05:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally like vs. better. It looks more familiar.--Yugioh73036 06:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: abbreviations

message: HERES HOW IT WENT DOWN: Scott Steiner comes into the ring. He clocks Brother Ray. Joe pins Ray. Angle hits Joe. Angle goes for Olympic Slam. As he has Ray in the air Joe clips his knee ala last weeks impact where angle did the same thing. Joe pins Joe wins stop adding that Scott knocked him out and quit changing it.BlueShrek 22:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 07 finish

message: Should that Triple X note be in there? It doesn't seem that notable to me. Also, as a long time TNA fan this whole situation is annoying to me since Triple X are supposed to be banned from ever teaming again (as a result of losing to America's Most Wanted at Turning Point 2004). Chuck Quizmo 20:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: TV Shows drop storylines all the time. The sooner you realize wrestling is a TV show, the better yout life will be. Mshake3 21:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that, and am used to it with WWE. TNA is usually more careful with things like this though. Chuck Quizmo 21:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's how I view these stipulations. If the current man in charge, COrnette, doesn't want to enforce it, then that's that. The guy who enforced the ruiling, Dusty, no longer works there. Mshake3 21:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Wrestling in general is frustrating when they choose to enforce certain things. Like how Edge was stripped of the WHC at the SmackDown tapings (not a spoiler since it's right on WWE's own front page) for being unable to defend the title for 30 days, but Trish Stratus when more than 5 months without even wrestling at all and kept the Women's Championship. Chuck Quizmo 21:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: World Title is up here. Women's Title is down here. Mshake3 21:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know, but they should stop referencing this so called rule then. Chuck Quizmo 22:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Triple X
Talk:McCleskey v. Kemp

message: Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.
Add to the end of the Impact section:
Some academics have argued that the impact of McCleskey v. Kemp has largely been overstated.  Even though McCleskey v. Kemp seems to dismiss statistical racial disparities as doctrinally irrelevant in equal protection claims, admissions statistics have been used in judicial opinions, such as Grutter v. Bollinger.
Cf2022 (talk) 08:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ferkijel (talk) 08:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Proposed Changes
Category talk:Autocannon

message: How come there are still so many calibers in modern autocannons (20/23/25/27/30 millimeters)? Shouldn't there be an ideal diameter? It looks like the Mauser BK27 is gaining some favour lately. 195.70.32.136 19:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The plural of Cannon isCannon not cannons. Can the category be re-named to reflect this?Petebutt (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural
Talk:Pfeiffer syndrome

message: Some text in this article was originally taken from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition=pfeiffersyndrome (public domain) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wouterstomp (talk • contribs) 19:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Origination

message: Hi, I plan on contributing to the 'Pfeiffer Syndrome' article as a part of an assignment for the Advanced Genetics course at the University of Western Ontario. For those that are following this article, I will be adding accurate, cited content about this topic, while ensuring that I follow the Wikipedia guidelines. Send me a message if you have any questions regarding changes made to this article. Vsubasri (talk) 19:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement of 'Pfeiffer Syndrome' for Advanced Genetics Wikipedia Project