lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Christian Wirth

message: The section that discusses Wirth's involvement with Chelmno is incorrect. Throughout the Aktion Reinhard (AR) campaign in the General Government, Wirth continued in his role as Inspector of the three camps (Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka), after which, along with AR's commander, Odilo Globocnik, he was transferred to north-western Italy (the OZAK military area). While there, Wirth commanded Einstazkommando-R. This unit was made up of staff from the AR camps, and divided into EKR-1 (Trieste, based in the Risiera di San Sabba camp), EKR-2 (Fiume) and EKR-3 (Udine). Its roles included anti-Partisan operations as well as the arrest and murder of Jews, Gypsies and other "enemies". After his death at the hands of partisans, Wirth's role was occupied briefly by his Belzec deputy commander, Gottlieb Hering, then by Dieter Allers.
Chelmno was not a part of Aktion Reinhard, nor was it located in the General Government. It was set up by the leadership of the annexed Wartheland territory (centred on Posen/Poznan) to murder the very large Jewish community of Lodz. Responsible figures included the Gauleiter, Artur Greiser; the HSSPF, Wilhelm Koppe; and the head of the Lodz ghetto administration, Hans Biebow. Chelmno camp commanders were Herbert Lange, followed by Hans Bothmann. Unlike the T4/Aktion Reinhard organisation, Chelmno was not a construct of the Fuhrer Chancellory, instead reporting to the Wartheland administration.
"Odilo Globocnik, Hitler's Man in the East", Joseph Poprzeczny, McFarland (2004).
"Chelmno and the Holocaust, The History of Hitler's First Death Camp", Patrick Montague, I B Taurus (2012).
FiftusTheSixth (talk) 22:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wirth's involvement with Chelmno is incorrect 

message: How can human flesh that is mostly water be burned effectively or efficiently without the use of any fuel? 2605:8D80:62C:A872:B1F7:6779:8E9B:4FD2 (talk) 18:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Wirth, Said to have devised a method of burning bodies without The use of fuel. How was that done?
Talk:Keith Douglas

message: From the current page as of 21 January 2007:
Keith Castellain Douglas (January 24, 1920 - June 9, 1944), was an English poet.
By 1899, the chicken farm set up by his father collapsed. Douglas was sent to a preparatory school (Edgeborough School in Guildford) the same year.
Can this be rectified?
- 124.189.100.175 (talk) 03:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies in Early Life 

message: This caption for the photograph of K.D.'s tombstone is meaningless as it stands ('burial' means the act of interring the body, not an object). This should presumably be changed to 'Keith Douglas's tombstone' or '.... gravestone' - note the spelling (not just 'Keith Douglas').  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Keith Douglas burial'
Talk:Hakone Tozan Cable Car

message: I have found two conflicting gauge statements. The funiculars.net source (as cited in the article) says 1200mm. Our colleagues on the Japanese edition of Wikipedia (as linked under 'in other languages' and translated by Google) say 983mm. Anybody know any more?. -- Chris j wood 13:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quick googling seems to suggest it's 983mm . The news release from Odakyu's official website confirms this, although the page is already gone. (Warning: this google cache link is extremely slow.)  Kzaral 00:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gauge 
Talk:Hurricane on the Bayou

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: This page can easily be improved if more details are added to the page and the page is organized. The page needs more sub-headings such as plot, characters, music, awards, production, and the purpose of the film. This is part of a school project for the University of Mississippi English 101 class. --Nmfrench (talk) 18:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You can do it.--210.159.191.31 (talk) 07:53, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment (2009)
Talk:Hans Philipp

message: The section on Goring's order to ram or get courtmartialled seems weird - I can't find any references to it that don't appear to come back to this article. It seems like the sort of thing that would be well covered if it was real.  you've done a lot of work on this article - perhaps you have an idea on the veracity of this?Pipsally (talk) 11:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference to this statement is before the list. See the following book, page 184. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, I watnt clear. I say the source their, but I cannot find any other evidence of this, and it seems like something there should be more sources forPipsally (talk) 15:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have a look here, not specifically speaking to details, it addresses the point. This book and book use different words but also speaks to the topic. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see. Thanks for your help, and apologies for the typos - fat fingers and mobile don't mix!Pipsally (talk) 17:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goring's orders
Talk:Fucus

message: I'm having trouble. 1st: "Powell" wrote two papers in the same year and I am having problems entering the separately. 2. the F. distichus is a mess. I can't sort out why !!Osborne 13:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fucus distichus

message: I think it best to give only a brief description of the different species under Fucus and a detailed description under the species other-wise there will be duplication of info.Osborne 15:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arrangement
Talk:Herbert Choy

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Herbert Young Cho Choy was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Bernardo Pisano

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it would benefit from a works list, images and sound, and additional inline citations.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 14:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Herbert Robbins

message: :: After World War II, Robbins taught at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill from 1946 to 1952, where he was one of the original members of the first statistics department in the USA, and
: 
Someone recently deleted the words above starting with "where" and preceding "and".  I think I added this information.  I must have thought it was just something everybody knew.  I'll see if I can find something to cite.  Probably something published in Statistical Science.  In 1996, when the UNC statistics department observed its 50th anniversary, Herbert Robbins was an invited speaker, and I attended his two talks.  I seem to recall that this fact was mentioned.  As Arnold Schwarzenegger would say........ Michael Hardy (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As mentioned in the article, there was a bio of Robbins in Statistical Science ().  It says that he was one of the original members in the department of mathematical statistics at UNC Chapel Hill, but not whether or not this was the first statistics department in the country. Spacepotato (talk) 06:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recently deleted information
Talk:Berthold Haller

message: Berthold Haller and Berchtold Haller is one and the same Person. One article is enough. Berchtold is IMO more appropriate for the 15th century. ajnem (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Will merge and make one as a redirect. --RelHistBuff (talk) 17:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Berthold/Berchtold Haller articles
Talk:Herblock

message: In the pre-Stonewall days, the expression "He never married" was a euphemism often employed in the Obituary pages of newspapers to indicate that a person was gay.  Is there any implication to be read into that here?  I'm not trying to imply that this is relevant to his status as an editorial cartoonist, but I am curious.Partnerfrance (talk) 17:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the only place I've found where he talks about that. He said he'd had girlfriends, but somehow never was inclined to get married: http://www.booknotes.org/Watch/52323-1/Herbert-Block Make of it what you will. Mahousu (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He never married".
Talk:Blanche Parry

message: As the portrait in Tredegar house is being wrongly sited elsewhere as of Blanche Parry I have now corrected this while not removing this portrait entirely, see:https://www.artuk.org/artdetective/discussions/discussions/who-is-the-sitter-if-not-blanche-parry-15081590 This was known as an Unknown Elizabethan Lady and this title is now considered accurate. Information from the National Trust Art Curator, Tredegar House.
The Pilley portrait is only known from this photograph. Its companion painting of Queen Elizabeth I has now been found and is in the USA. It would be wonderful to know if Blanche Parry's painting has survived too - has anyone seen it please?(User talk:BethANZ)
Please note: anyone interested in the truth about Blanche Parry is referred to 'Mistress Blanche, Queen Elizabeth I's Confidante', new edition 2018 (User talk:BethANZ)
Please note that an article is not the right place for praising the merits of a particular publication. This borders on advertising. I have therefore removed that paragraph. I have created a proper section for Notes and References instead. For NPOV reasons I have also adapted the text to a more neutral stance; for example it can hardly be maintained that Blanche Parry was "the closest person" to Elizabeth for all her life; even if the book's author says that, that's only her assumption. WP must mantain a neutral stance: using a source does not imply to copy all its content uncritically. Buchraeumer (talk) 15:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-Up

message: A programme on Blanche Parry was broadcast on Radio Wales programme 28 Jan 2018, mostly using commentary by Ruth Richardson, the author of the principal source on Blanche Parry as used in this WP article. Programme made by Huw Thomas BBC Wales arts and media correspondent See Queen's Confidante: The Story of Blanche Parry BBC Radio Wales, 18:30 GMT on 25 January and on BBC iPlayer. Richardson and her book are now clearly regarded as  reliable sources, and have now been referred to by many academics, including Eleri Lynn, the curator of historic dress for Historic Royal Palaces. It should perhaps have been apparent to any sensible observer that a lady who has TWO grand monuments in her memory, one of which is in such an important place as St Margaret's Westminster, is "notable" for WP purposes, even if she did apparently erect one of them herself! Something of a Bess of Harwick it seems!Lobsterthermidor (talk) 19:50, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio Wales programme 28 Jan 2018, extra source
Talk:Herman Goldstine

message: I'm about to undo this edit's spelling change of von Neumann to Neumann.  I've never heard of von Neumann being referred to as "Neumann" in English.  Let me know if there's an issue with this.  173.228.123.121 (talk) 06:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The particle "von" is not properly part of the surname. That's why an index will have "Hindenburg, Paul von" and not "von Hindenburg, Paul". Standard English usage is that it's used when giving the person's full name (or the name with a military rank in front) but not as the beginning of the surname when using it on its own. For instance, we don't say "The new Chancellor was von Bismarck" or "one of von Goethe's poems". Moonraker (talk) 07:59, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  von Neumann -> Neumann and back 
Talk:Bridget of York

message: I changed Bridget of York's page to remove references to her supposed illegitimate child. The sources cited to support the claim that she gave birth to a natural child (an article by Dale Hoak and a book by Jeffrey Hamilton) did not even mention Bridget, much less her child. Boswellbaxter (talk) 05:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Caramuru

message: * .
 — LlywelynII 14:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion

message: I guess the page is in the right place but, if so, it should lead with that form of the name. — LlywelynII 14:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Rodolfo Pio da Carpi

message: Something seriously wrong here: "His friend Pius III assigned him his choice of sees; he preferred the delightful see of Frascati to Faenza (1553 – 1555). Only the intractable resistance of his feudal superior, cardinal d'Este prevented his being made pope at the conclave of 1559."
Pius III died in 1503.  Is Paul III meant?  Is the friendship transferable?  The meaning of 'preferred the See of Frascati' may be misunderstood.  He had been Cardinal Priest of S. Maria in Trastevere (1544-1553), and was 'preferred'  Bishop of Albano on 29 November 1553; he was then promoted ('preferred') to Frascati (Tusculum) on 11 December 1553; he was then 'preferred' to the See of Porto on 29 May 1555.  If one really means 'he preferred the delightful see of Frascati', then he was quickly disabused and moved on after 18 months.  But that is not what is meant.  He had been Bishop of Faenza from 13 November 1528, and he passed the diocese to his brother Teodoro.
--Vicedomino (talk) 07:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pius III
Talk:Hermann Pálsson

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1702568.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Catharina van Hemessen

message: Corrected expically to especially Conorflan (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: I am curious as to the correct spelling of the artists name?
I'm studying Art and its Histories at the Open University and one of the University supplied books spells its Catarina van Hemessen, repeatedly. With it being spelt Catharina de Hemessen in apparently her native tongue.
Google books also returns searches for both although appears to lean to the Caterina for english language books. Conorflan (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Getty Union List gives the preferred name as "Hemessen, Catharina van". - PKM (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artists Name
Talk:Matome Ugaki

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Ishikawajima was given as the final location of Ugaki in a 2008 edit. Does anyone know where this is? GMaps has never heard of it, and the linked articles refer to two companies in Tokyo. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Ishikawajima? 

message: United_States_Merchant_Marine_Academy#American_Merchant_Marine_Museum:
"The museum inside the Barstow Mansion officially opened on May 20, 1979. Inside you will find an extensive collection of nautical art, models, tools and other artifacts that span decades of maritime history. One highlight of the collections is a Japanese sword that was surrendered by Vice Admiral Matomu Ugaki to Supreme Allied Commander and General of the Army Douglas MacArthur on October 18, 1945. The sword on display is one of only five in existence." Not in line with the information here. See the dates.--Stunteltje (talk) 10:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: The article states that Ugaki was in command of the 1st Battleship Division comprising Nagato, Yamaton and Musashi during the Battle of the Sibuyan Sea on October 24th, 1944, and that "...from the fall of 1944 to the summer of 1945 all three ships would be severely damaged by overwhelming strikes by U.S. carrier-based planes." In fact, Musashi was sunk by US carrier aircraft already during the Battle of the Sibuyan Sea on the 24th of October 1944 while Yamato was sunk by carrier aircraft on April 7th, 1945 during Operation Ten-Go. The only ship of the three to survive to the aforementioned summer of 1945 was the Nagato, which was the only Japanese battleship to survive the war with fairly light damage and was finally sunk in the Operation Crossroads nuclear tests in 1946.--Death Bredon (talk) 16:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st Battleship Division "severe damage"
Talk:Hicham Zerouali

message: Was he still married when he died? If so, why did his wife live in another country? Was she Scottish herself? Or just preferred the British benefits system?--MartinUK (talk) 10:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you want to attempt to answer the question? I'm trying to establish wehther she has a legal right to remain in the country - nothing racist about that.--MartinUK (talk) 09:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that it really matters to the article, but I'm fairly sure she is a local girl, and therefore is allowed to stay in the country she was born in. Swaddon1903 (talk) 09:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: https://www.worldfootball.net/player_summary/hicham-zerouali/ found a newer more up too date version of his stats Camperkat (talk) 00:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found a new Source of stats
Talk:Reginald Punnett

message: Perhaps someone can add a section on mimicry. --  Astrochemist 14:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a Punnett square until someone can locate and post a picture of Punnett himself. -- Astrochemist 03:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: I've searched off and on for about a year for a public-domain Punnett picture for this Wikipedia article.  A Punnett square would be better than nothing, and certainly more attractive than the non-encyclopedic shadow images that are sometimes left are in Wikipedia infoboxes.  Can a fair-use Punnett photograph be located?  Advice and/or help will be appreciated. --  Astrochemist (talk) 14:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punnett picture 

message: I removed the following text from Dihybrid cross. --Ettrig (talk) 15:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  From Dihybrid cross 
Talk:Walhalla, South Carolina

message: This is possibly the least informative and interesting article I have ever read on Walhalla. The history of Walhalla is so much more rich and diverse. 
There is far to much information about the Railroad and earthquakes (which are practically non-existant). 
There is no mention of the historic culture of the town - the old opera house, college, ect...
Additionally, the information about how the town was settled is inaccurate. There is no mention of the German Colonization Society or John Wagner or any of the other trustees of the Society which actually lead to the larger settlement of Germans to the area. 
The information about Southern Baptists and the Oktoberfest are inaccurate and misleading. The Oktoberfest is extremely popular with people of all religions, especially, the local baptist community. 
It's sad to see an article about a beautiful town with many interesting historical points turned into an article about railroads, planned buildings, and non-existant earthquakes. Sadly, the use of "folks," poor attempts at distasteful humor and poor spelling, grammar and punctuation have made this vibrant town seem dull. 76.105.150.19 07:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I tried to strip the article of all that railroad stuff, bad facts, and bad grammar. I also added a couple of references to give the hint that people NEED TO CITE information.
What people should do now is to write a history section filled with how Walhalla was settled and why. They should also add sections for cultural activities like the Oktoberfest. That should help reflect the true charm of this tiny town.
Rocketman768 (talk) 00:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad article revision 