Talk:Separation of powers under the United States Constitution

message: I was under the impression that FDR's presidency marked a major shift in the balance of power between the president and Congress.  Before FDR, was it common for a president to push legislation?  Certainly it has been common since then (The Fair Deal, the War on Poverty, No Child Left Behind, etc) but I thought FDR was the first to do this.  Isomorphic 02:13, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 26 Jun 2004

message: That is Hamilton's bread and butter (why no mention of Hamilton either)?  Is tyranny by the majority info perhaps best added elsewhere?  zen master 05:59, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of "tyranny by the majority"?

message: I'm not sure about the accuracy of this statement: "Another strict constitutional principle delineated in the United States Constitution and referred to as a separation of powers, is that between the federal level of government and the state level. This principle is more often referred to as federalism."  I don't think anyone ever really refers to federalism as "separation of powers"?  --JW1805 02:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Federalism

message: The non-delegation doctrine is not very clearly presented (it should be clearer that it is effectively a dead-letter). Also, the problem with the line-item veto isn't excessive delegation, but rather the Presentment Clause. Amcfreely 06:28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Legislative power

message: What's noteworthy about independent agencies is not that the President is not entitled to control any particular agency, but rather than they can exist at all. The problem with the legislative veto is not interference with executive officers, but rather the Presentment and Bicameralism requirements. Amcfreely 06:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Exective power

message: Should mention Northern Pipeline and Schor and should link to Article III court Amcfreely 06:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Judicial power

message: The section is too detailed for its place. If not deleted, the content should be merged here. Unless a better qualified person steps forward, I'll be bold. --Swift 06:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge section [[Separation of Powers#The United States]]

message: Who is Rice, and what is meant by the sentence that starts, "Rice therefore suggested ..." Sounds like something a constitutional scholar might understand right off, but alas, I am not one of those. ;-) Help? (a wikilink to the correct article on Rice might help clarify) --MoxRox 01:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is Rice in the second paragraph?

message: Hmm...
:Wikipedia does not have a sense of humor.--agr 20:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What, no Cheney branch?

message: This may be true, but I see no basis for this quoted in the article.  Should the sentence be removed until a verifiable source is shown?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.167.62.149 (talk) 17:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   Johnson and Nixon during the 1960s and 1970s exploited the presidency particularly Nixon. 

message: Since the Constitution enumerates the authority/powers of each branch of the government, isn't there a remedy or injunction to executive orders not specifically allowed/enumerated under the constitution?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.230.50.18 (talk) 19:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Executive Orders 

message: * { { Multiple issues|cleanup=February 2009|original research=February 2009|weasel=April 2010| { { Too few opinions|date=October 2012 } }  } }
* I removed the above tags. If you have any issues with that, just copy, paste & re-tag. No work was done as follow-up once the tags were established. 10stone5 (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed these tags 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Separation of powers under the United States Constitution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081211012558/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/browse.html to http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/browse.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Separation of powers under the United States Constitution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040617101806/http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/funddocs/fed/federa47.htm to http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/funddocs/fed/federa47.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I found this but I'm not sure if this will be directly relevant to the article "STATES SUING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT: PROTECTING LIBERTY OR PLAYING POLITICS?" by Elbert Lin
WhisperToMe (talk) 01:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  States suing the US Federal government 

message: This article is a childish mess that reads like the ramblings of a poorly-educated 17-year-old teenager who barely passed civics but has no university-level training in political science or jurisprudence.  I don't have the time to research this subject from scratch. At some point I plan to look at the article history and either revert back to the last good version (I remember it used to be much shorter and clearer), or pull out most of the unsourced garbage and reduce it to the bare-bones facts that everyone can agree on (the kind of things that I can readily find sources for on Google Books in civics textbooks). --Coolcaesar (talk) 16:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a childish mess