lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Football League First Division

message: The League didn't fold.
It's the exact same as the Championship with same trophy. It was just rebranded.  
It doesn't seem especially useful to have a list of winners of the old and new first divisions on the same page.  We would do better to have a list of winners of the old first division and the premier league.  Same goes for other divisions also.  Morwen - Talk 00:19, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I've reverted User:Pal's edit redirecting this article to FA Premier League: The First Division and the Premier League are not the same thing. The First Division predates the Premiership by over a 100 years, and between 1992 and 2004 was an entirely separate competition that ran in parallel. In articles wikilinking to the First Division that refer to its incarnation before 1992, it makes no sense to redirect them to the FA Premier League article, as it did not exist then; references to it between 1992 and 2004 are on the other hand, it is entirely erroneous. Qwghlm 07:13, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not saying they're the same thing, but given that the Football League First Division has basically no content (more or less just links to other articles), there's no reason it couldn't be included in the FA Premier League article's history section since the FAPL is the continuation of the top flight. While the First Division's history could be expanded here, it's already thoroughy covered in the Football in England article, so we'd just be duplicating existing content. - Pal 12:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is some history of the First Division in the Football in England article but it is bundled up with other competitions and historical events; a separate article is still viable option. You're right in saying this article is shot and not very good, but that should mean a rewrite and expansion, rather than merging it, which implies the First Division & Premier League are/were one and same. Would you at least bear with me while I try to improve this article? Qwghlm 13:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you are willing to expand this article I'll certainly drop my suggestion that the article be merged. - Pal 14:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: FA Premier League

message: Please tell us about the cup.  
-How old is the cup?  Is it still the cup of the top division or is it the cup of the next down or the First Division of the League?
What ranking does this cup have compared to other cups?
IceDragon64 (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cup?
Talk:Walburga Stemmer

message: I'm removing the  tag, because the article does indeed explain her significance: she's Rommel's reputed lover and mother of his love child.  The other tags are accurate and stay.  Binabik80 00:33, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can a birth date be found to give Joseph Pan's age?  To just state a number (62) makes no sense the further one gets in time from the writing of the article (or at least that part of it).Cloptonson (talk) 20:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Joseph Pan
Talk:Street theatre

message: The link to the website titled  About "Street Theater" is based on mostly controversial and unsubstantiated anecdotal accounts rather than scientific investigation.  Replaced link with more objective documentation.24.168.236.113 17:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  link:  http://www.raven1.net/abtstth.htm 

message: Nominating this page for protection.  
Revisions and edits occurring that suggest vandalism or attempts at an edit war.24.168.236.113 19:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  request protection 

message: The second section of this article seems to be about violent warfare in the public space. These things are different enough that it deserves a separate article, especially as what it is talking about isn't called 'Street Theatre' at all. There seems to be a vague claim that the arena where is takes place is referred to by miltarists as the "Street Theatre" (as in 'the rural theatre is calm, so we're going to organize an operation in the street theatre", but this is pretty unsubstantiated. Let's move this elsewhere. 199.71.183.2 18:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Violence

message: Intimidation is not limited to merely ethnicity, but includes intimidation targeting people of different religions, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disabilites, or political affiliation among other things.75.184.81.173 13:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intimidation

message: As described in its article, "interactive street theatre" is a very straightforward subset of street theatre, and could be described in that article instead. The sources cited for the two examples given just call it "street theatre". Lord Belbury (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It's certainly short enough that merging the two would be a fairly simple task, and merging would likely increase the quality of both articles, as well as being easier for readers. -SalamanderMatrix (talk) 05:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Interactive street theatre]] into [[Street theatre]]
Talk:Pine Grove, Norfolk County, Ontario

message: Things to check:
* is this a conservative neighbourhood (and for which definition of conservative)?
* do dogs truly deter people from walking, and is this causal to obesity?
* for that matter, are people in the hamlet obese?
Mindmatrix 01:40, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: It seems a little 'heavy-handed' to me to just simply sweep in on an article about a tiny community,put together almost exclusively by a single editor and delete most of its contents without any prior discussion or the placement of any warning templates beforehand. If the editor who did that has "issues" regarding the overall quality of an article, perhaps they could start by discussing them here first and placing an appropriate template or two before "wiping out" most of the contents in one go. Deconstructhis (talk) 06:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you know this particular editor's history?  He is well know for adding OR, NPOV, and total falsehoods to every article he makes.  Many of his articles have been culled in a similar fashion.  You'll see warning after warning on his talk page.  This is the second time such content was removed from this particular article.  Unless, of course, you actually believe most of that stuff he added or think it qualifies as encyclopedic content. AnmaFinotera (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding Massive Deletion of Material From The Article
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. foreign interventions since 1945

message: "To request that a page (or image) be permanently deleted, the request made on AFD/ND/IFD, and any opinions or comments relating to a listed page must be made in good faith. At the end of the discussion, if a rough consensus  has been reached to delete the page, the page will be removed. Otherwise the page remains."
8 votes to delete, 
8 votes to keep
3 to merge, according to my count. Please note this is a modification of the original page, to count the votes easier, the original page is now reverted back by myself here.Travb 01:53, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous attempt to delete this article.
Talk:Dale Steyn

message: There is almost no information on this page. Why does it exist?
:How this stub and a lot of others came about is a long story and I won't go into it. There are some 450 cricket articles of < 250 bytes around at the moment. See the list at User:CricketBot/substubs. We, at WP:Cricket, are working on them. 50 odd have already been expanded. The rest, including Steyn, will be done in a few weeks. Tintin 02:51, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section headed "Controversies" only mentions a single 'controversy' -- when Dale Steyn was fined 100% of his match fee for spitting at another player in a Test match. It goes without saying, then, that if this section is to remain in this article, it shouldn't be titled "Controversies" when it only mentions one incident. The more important question, though, is whether this section should remain in the article at all. Not that I want to say spitting at another player is trivial and irrelevant, but surely most players get fined some of their match fees at some point in their career - do we really need to mention every such incident? At the very least, maybe the section could be renamed "Spitting incident" or "Spitting controversy" or something like that, to better indicate the actual content of the section. And if the section is to remain, it should probably be expanded to show clearly why this incident is so worthy of inclusion on his page (e.g. was there a huge fallout from the scandal, with lots of pundits furious at his behaviour? was that degree of punishment very rare, or unusually harsh, or whatever? seems to me like 100% of match fee fines are relatively rare, but is it rare enough to warrant such prominent mention on his page?)99.120.41.190 (talk) 09:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversies" 

message: This edit changed the height. Neither the original nor the change are cited, so it needs to be checked out. Greenman (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: In response: Removed uncited, constantly changed (it was now at 1.76, go figure) and trivial detail per WP:V. 107.190.33.254 (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited change to height 
Talk:Duncan White

message: Who deleted my picture?
Carolaman 02:16, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Holditch's theorem

message: It seems too bad that policy dictates immediate removal of an external link to Pat Ballew's blog entry on Hamnett Holditch:
* Pat's blog.
In this instance, at least, the blog entry gives helpful information of a strictly factual nature not in the article. An alternative is to duplicate this information in the article, for example in a new section on Holditch's biography, but that would not give due credit to Ballew as source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.180.1.224 (talk) 04:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pat Ballew's blog
Talk:Kwannon (character)

message: Shouldn't you say what series this chracter is from?
:This seems to have long since been addressed in the article to state X-Men.--2pou (talk) 19:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused

message: That doesn't sound Japanese - is it Chinese?  Either way, where did she get it?  Twin Bird 02:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kwannon (or Kannon) is the Japanese name for the Buddhist deity Guan Yin. How Revanche came to be called this is unknown.Tathunen (talk) 00:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kwannon? 
Talk:Pierre Bensusan

message: Here is a summary of what I have done to the Bensusan article.
-Fixed some minor grammar problems, including verb tenses, problems with NPOV, and readability. 
-Is DADGAD Pierre's personal recording company that he himself named, or is it just a music publisher? Or am I getting confused with Favor Nations? I think Lawrence Juber also records for DADGAD. 
-In terms of the summary of Bensusan's album Intuite it is his first purely instrumental album as opposed to what the article had stated as solely acoustical. 
I will come back to this article in the upcoming weeks to add citations. Will look into August issue of the magazine "Fingerstyle Guitar" of which his interview was profiled.
Zidel333 02:38, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits of Article 
Talk:Descendants of Darkness

message: Uh, there's an emoticon on the tail end of the last sentence of the first paragraph about Asato Tsuzuki. Not my fandom by any means, but I didn't think Wikipedia allowed emoticons. 
Mythicaldog 10:42, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conforming to a higher standard of quality... 

message: Does anyone know exactly when YnM will continue? More than half of 2006 has passed... Has Hakusensha released any information regarding this?
It's nearly March of 2007. Only by sending snail mail inquiries to Viz & or Hakusensha, or the sudden appearence of a Matsushida homepage (unlikely given that she has only 1 manga series & hasn't written in years) will we find out.
She disappeared off the face of the earth. It's likely that she quit for some troublesome reason & got an office job, she could even be dead for all we know. There's hardly any information about her on the Japanese wiki. Plus, I recall that YnM was new when I read it the first time in the late 90s. I only know of one mangaka who took an almost-decade break from a title & returned to it, but she had a lot of titles under her belt (Aoike Yasuko). At least the woman who wrote DNAngel has picked up again, but it's really a shame that YnM had to end endlessly the way it did.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.236.142 (talk) 14:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When will Yoko Matsushita continue YnM??? 

message: It has been mentioned that the article could be split into two: one titled 'List of Yami no Matsuei characters' and the main page ('Yami no Matsuei'). If this were to be the case, would there be enough on the main page to prevent it looking bare? Quite a lot of the information seems to be character-based, after all...
Incidentally, are there any plans for an episode guide? (I think that that would be quite useful, personally).
Apathy Irath (talk) 08:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerning separate sections... 

message: It's been almost 6 years, Matsushita hasn't done any manga at all since. Face it, it's canceled.
^^
We would need some ref to determine if it's true or not. for all we know it can be on hold, or still being developed. it could be canceled as well but we need a reference in order to add it.Bread Ninja (talk) 17:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it REALLY on hiatus? 

message: All ove the web, the 8  year hiatus is suddenly being credited to injury of the right hand. Is there a reliable source?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 (talk) 00:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matsushida's Health? 

message: Volume 12 in Japanese is available for purchase and seems to have been since 2010-01-19  . kess (talk) 10:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looked around some more and while my understanding of Japanese is extremely crude it seems YnM have begun once again. Information on the August 1st number of The Hana to Yume is available from Natalie and a preview is available from the magazine’s homepage. kess (talk) 11:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume 12
Talk:Weak and strong forms in English

message: This also needs a section as to how "weak form" and "strong form" are used in mathematics and economics.
Mathematicians refer to a strong and weak form of induction.  Economists, always hoping to be seen as a rigorous science refer to a strong and weak form of an efficient market.  Shape shifters refer to a strong and weak form of bodily transference.  Okay, kidding about the last, but someone should add a section discussing strong and weak in terms of mathematics and economics.
::As it stands, this article is wrongly titled. It is only about English, and the title should make this clear. In addition, the coverage of the topic is minimal, and should be greatly expanded and referenced if it is to be useful to readers.  Peter Roach  RoachPeter (talk) 09:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Others uses 

message: I'm not sure if this belongs in this article or not, but the word "the" is often pronounced differently based on the word that follows it, e.g. "the pear" (weak) vs. "the apple" (strong).  It generally follows the same rules as "a" vs. "an", only the spelling doesn't change, so it could be seen as worthy of a special note here - unless there's another name for that phenomenon?  Lurlock (talk) 20:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 

message: At Talk:Stress and vowel reduction in English I have suggested merging this page into that one (since it concerns only English, and is a subtopic of that one). Victor Yus (talk) 07:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Victor Yus (talk) 13:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: I think it would be worth adding the information that some weak form words usually appear in their strong form when they are unstressed but are utterance-final. My list includes at, for, from, of, some, as, can, have/has/had, shall/should, must, do/does, am/are/was/were. RoachPeter (talk) 15:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's what the final sentence is trying to say, though perhaps it could be made more explicit. Victor Yus (talk) 07:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak forms in final position
MediaWiki talk:Anontalkpagetext

message: There is a RfC active at MediaWiki talk:Sp-contributions-footer-anon relating to the content of this footer. - Vanstrat (talk) 23:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: RfC is now closed. Consensus was to change the footer to read "Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users" instead of "Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users". - Vanstrat ((🗼)) 15:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC was active at [[MediaWiki talk:Sp-contributions-footer-anon]] relating to this footer 

message: Please change "discussion page" to "discussion page".
"contributions page" in the contributions footer links to Help:User contributions, so this link keeps consistency between the templates and helps new IP users in the process. - Vanstrat ((🗼)) 06:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done seems uncontroversial — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:46, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Vanstrat - 10 December 2017 

message: 
↓

à la . The live version is creating an extraneous line. Nardog (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 17:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 15 February 2018
Talk:Bombing of Frampol

message: This quotation of Schreyer about Frampol is that important that also the original text in German should be presented.
84.74.62.65 (talk) 12:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The quotation in German

message: Wolfgang Schreyer now has an article. The quote is likely from his 1960s "Augen am Himmel: Eine Piratenchronik"  . The translation of the quote attributed to "Eyes on the sky" seems amateurish, the book apparently was not officially translated. -- Matthead  Discuß   00:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolfgang Schreyer 

message: I know that the standard practice is to accuse the Nazis of any atrocity that can be conceived by the mind of man and then accept the accusation without question; but can't more evidence be provided than a short passage written by a novelist? 
It also would be helpful to indicate who were the responsible commanding officers. You know, like who gave the orders. If they survived the war were they prosecuted for war crimes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falange (talk • contribs) 14:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More Documentation Please

message: Good and short article.Terror bombing was created by japaneses and nazists, not by Arthur Harris or Royal Air Force. Agre22 (talk) 18:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, no it wasn't. The Germans were bombed by the British before Frampol - the UK hit Wilhelmshaven, Cuxhaven and Heligoland. But thanks for playing. --Npovshark (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As of 2011, Wikipedia contain no information of the bombing of Wilhelmshaven, Cuxhaven and Heligoland before this bombing of Frampol. Did it actually happen? Rmhermen (talk) 04:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Terror bombing was created by nazists
Talk:Riki-Oh

message: Specifically, more info needs to be added.  Since we've finally gotten most of the scans translated into English, we should be able to include more detailed information regarding the story and characters (especially the story). We could also possibly create a page that has all of the volumes listed on it, with brief descriptions of what occurs in each one. --Nobody (talk) 13:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I know. There is a lot more to be said (I'll do what I can). I really couldn't believe such a minor character as Robotomi had by far the most detailed description! As of now the entire series has been translated, but as for this wish, I don't know. I think the volumes thing may be unnecessary, but maybe group the volumes for their story arcs (for example the prison arc, comprising the first two volumes). --juunannio 22:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs some updating 

message: How has there been no mention of the Western response to Riki-Oh? Especially with the fact that they each have a star of david and swastika, respectfully? To the western perception, that's pretty ironic. Especially the grave with has a swastika within the star of david. ForestAngel (talk) 01:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star of David and Swastika 

message: These were oneshot stories which appear in the final two volumes. One is mentioned at the top of the article (N.Y. Dust included in the final volume), but there is also Kirinji from the previous volume. I am thinking of adding a small desription for each. If anyone feels this is unnecessary, they may remove it. But I don't see anywhere else they would go. --juunannio 22:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Short Stories 
Talk:All the King's Men (2006 film)

message: I read on IMDB that this movie is not actually a remake of the 1949 film, but rather a second movie based on the novel by Robert Penn Warren (which is pretty good btw).  Not sure on the exact policy of categorizing/classifying movies and remakes and such, but i thought i'd throw in that tidbit for consideration.  Thoughts? --Subterfugest 03:32, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake? 

message: Is there a reason why this article is in the category "German films"? There was not much in the movie that appeared to be German.
:Average movie aside, but it was financed by both American and German money. Whatever language is spoken is irrelevant. Lots of movies have several financial sources and thus several "nationalities". Just check the imdb page . Ihtah. 15:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German? 

message: I edited this out ("Willie Stark's son Tom has a more prominent role in the book than in the film.  In the book he is portrayed as rebellious and arrogant, and clearly resentful of the way his father attempts to live vicariously through his youth. None of those features are portrayed in the film.") because it is basically said -and more in depth- in theitem previous to the last. Nazroon 21:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences between book and novel 

message: The only thing I see resembling a plot or synopsis is 'about the life of Willie Stark, a fictional character resembling Louisiana governor Long' There is a lot of other stuff which is great but someone who has seen it needs to add a bigger plot section. Tydamann (talk) 14:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot