lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hereward the Wake

message: I remember reading somewhere that a possible ancestor of Hereward's was John Harvard, the man for whom the university was named.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It does not seem likelt that Harvard could be the ancestor of someone born 800 years before him.86.13.151.12 19:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hereward and Harvard?

message: Just finished it (... at last!). Worth the effort though; hope you agree. Fergananim 01:27, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you a reason for not calling Hereward the son of Leofric, for not calling him the husband of Torfrida, for not calling him the father of his daughter, Torfrida and for not saying that it was she who married Hugh of Envermeu (Huges d'Envermeu)? (RJP 11:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I've just converted both trees to the familytree template.  Because of disagreements with other sources, I've suppressed his ancestral tree, and for compactness' sake (and relevancy) I've trimmed his descendants.  Hopefully this will avoid the "domination" mentioned above.  Fergananim, I've left your original work intact (just commented out), but I think some serious work needs to be done to these trees, both on the genealogy and on integrating them more usefully into the article. —Ryan McDaniel 21:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I removed the tree altogether - its not properly sources and doesn't really add anything to the article. Spartaz Humbug! 06:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Wake Family Tree

message: Upon reflection, in view of the research tag, someone is going to be offended. I have reverted my contributions. I shall complete the article and place it on my own site with a link from the Wikipedia article. (RJPe (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion

message: Does anyone can provide Edmund King's "The Origins of the Wake Family: the early history of the barony of Bourne in Lincolnshire." (Northamptonshire Past and Present; 5 (1973–7), pp. 166–76) who is cited in the article ? It would be of much help in writing an article on the norman Wake family. Regards, PurpleHz (talk) 19:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edmund King's "The Origins of the Wake Family 

message: I cannot agree with the other comments. This seems to be a reasonable summary of the known details of a vaguely known character. If I've interpreted these details correctly, Hereward was the last active Resistance to the reign of William 1st.
I seem to recall that in the referenced episode of Hancock's Half Hour, Sid James wrote phony Lord Byron poems on the walls to try and get the house renovated. I cannot recall a mention of Hereward.AT Kunene (talk) 09:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hereward is mentioned in passing, but I can't see that it's notable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.90.248 (talk) 21:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hancock's Half Hour.
Talk:2005 New England Patriots Schedule

message: For a May 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/2005 New England Patriots Schedule
----
If deleted this article can form a solid base for 2005 New England Patriots Season.  The article as it stands will be available at User:McDogm/Pats Schedule, again in case of deletion.  Tx.     --McDogm 22:12, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Aria (disambiguation)

message: Aria is a suffix for some female personal names (e.g. Maria) should we mention it in this article? --SuperDude 22:15, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a suffix! "Maria" is from the Greek "Mariam" and the Hebrew "Miryam". It's not "M" + "aria".- Nunh-huh 22:21, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Suggest including Deux Ex Aria, that recognizes finger gestures from the wrist thanks to a layer of sensors. These sensors interpret the movement of the tendons, then our algorithm classifies the gesture, to control smartphone, smartwatch, camera and so on. BoldLuis. BoldLuis (talk) 07:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deux Ex Aria
Category talk:Types of military forces

message: Terrorist organizations should be in their own category and not part of Irregular Military.  Irregular Military should be reserved for non-standard military units fighting a conventional war as understood over the last couple of centuries and defined under the Genevar Convention.  Terrorist organizations do not fall into this catagory.  Further, everyone clearly understands what a terrorist organization is, as noted by the actual organization names.  Thus trying to put them in some other category is doing so for someone's POV.
--Noitall 22:30, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrorist Organizations

message: After I saw requests in several military article talk sections for anyone to do a better job of organizing the massive collection of articles not in any sub-category, and also a huge volume of somewhat related sub-categories, I moved some stuff to try to add a little bit more organization.
:Looks to me like the content of Category:Types of forces and Category:Types of military are so similar that perhaps they should be combined into a new sub-category:Types of military forces, which might go into the Category:Military organization, which is in turn in Category Military in Category:War. AlMac|(talk) 20:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: Suggest merging Category:Types of military forces to :Category:Military forces by type.  It seems redundant & confusing to have two similiarly named cats. Also, looks like lots of overlap. FieldMarine (talk) 18:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I hear ya. the problem is that actually they are not overlapping. this category, :Category:Types of military forces relates only to categories of entire national military forces, i.e. armies, navies, etc etc. whereas the other category, :Category:Military forces by type, relates to types of units within the larger national military., we simply need to find some alternate term to use, if possible and if anyone wishes. --Sm8900 (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion
Talk:Joe Kelly (racing driver)

message: For a photo from the 1940s, he's wearing a remarkably modern wristwatch ... isn't he? Back again, Reddy-troll? - Pete C ✍ 22:39, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Aosta

message: *Here is a logical connection I am unable to follow: "The city was the birthplace of Anselm, but goitre and cretinism prevail to a great extent." I doubt, in the age of iodized salt, the substance of the dependent clause. --Wetman 22:43, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't get connection made in this article with events in the 11th century being tied to events of the 19th. What is the link? and what is the proof? Daniel the Monk (talk) 13:53, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian Unification in the 11th century?
Talk:Social season (United Kingdom)

message: I have a reference from the Los Angeles Times for the Las Madrinas ball; just need to find the clipping.  PKM 22:50, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Las Madrinas

message: Hmm.  Why does the Royal Ascot section on dress codes state that there's no bare shoulders to be shown by women, and yet the picture accompanying that section clearly show a woman in sleeveless dress? Nijyo (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The dress code applies the the Royal enclosure only (the most exclusive area of the venue). The picture is just a general one from Royal Ascot - indeed the woman with the sleeveless dress would not be able to enter the Royal enclosure, but can attend Royal Ascot  Kurt O'Sys (talk) 16:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Royal Ascot dress code

message: It's not meant to. And how can it ever? It's a thing that is confined to the Anglosphere, and pre-war France. Or even just London the Home Counties, Hollywood and Manhattan. --94.2.63.58 (talk) 21:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, thanks for the comment. Actually, there is a "season" in the U.S., though much of it may be historic now. So it is perfectly fitting for this article to have a little note at the top suggesting that other editors might like to try their hand at globalizing it. I imagine there will be other countries with their own "seasons." BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Another option would be to retitle (move) this article to "London season" or something like that. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view 

message: Am I the only one who notices that the Ascot section says that women may not show bare shoulders, but the picture of the women at Ascot clearly shows a woman who is doing so? 24.185.57.182 (talk) 16:53, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo contradicts text 

message: I added the template because despite references to the American social season in the literature/pop culture section and the external links, there's no other detail about it. Nadhika99 (talk) 07:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Globalize cleanup template

message: Difficult to believe that Cheltenham racing (mid-March) or Grand National (has been in march but usually early April) is part of the London season. Neither have much in way of dress code in the way that Royal Ascot and Glorious Goodwood has.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianatc (talk • contribs) 10:21, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Season - Equestrianism
Talk:The Black Sheep (1992 film)

message: Uh...do we need a disambig for this? There has been quite a notable song recently in French in favour of opposition against the EU Constitution....seeing how France is about to vote "no", shouldn't it be noted? -- Natalinasmpf 22:53, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello there. As creator of & main contributor to this article, I don't really have a problem with this. Would you be willing to create an article on the song or, if not enough can be said to make a full-fledged article, could you write a substantial sum-up on the disambiguation page? Thanks for your suggestion. --Liberlogos 01:50, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, so is it okay with you if I move this page to Le Mouton noir (documentary)? -- Natalinasmpf 03:14, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm quite okay with a move. But since there is only one film with that name (that we plan to discuss on Wikipedia, for now), would not the Wikipedia standard be Le Mouton noir (movie)? --Liberlogos 05:59, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, although its in a movie sort of style (from what I see), its trying to bring across a message in a "matter-of-fact" sort of attitude rather than with an artistic message, right? I mean, we might as well categorise it as such if we've thought of it as such anyway? -- Natalinasmpf 22:21, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: I wondered if the phrase Le Mounton noir had any significance or history outside of the title of this documentary.  I've read some francophone commentators writing in English who seem to use it like it might have a certain currency or meaning in Quebec.  Any light you might be able to shed on this would give greater context for the article --Simon.Pole 11:34, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of the Phrase Le Mounton noir
Talk:Lindley Murray

message: Removed copyvio from here. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 22:57, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I saw your edit summary comment "‎Law career: confusing... did he ever leave practice? Cut the comment tending toward saints' legends..."
It's very confusing to me how long he was in practice. I don't think he did much for the first four years of the Revolutionary War. He's described as fishing, sailing, and something else. There's a source that said he returned to his practice in 1779, so that's in there, but it sounds like he made much more money on the import-export and shipping businesses.
I have been debating whether to spend more time on it. It seems (his memoir, Monaghan, not sure) that it was harder for him to get business in the last years of the war and during economic downturnsttt. If he was practicing law from 1779 to 1783, I don't think it was full-time.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: thx for the confirmation about that passage being confusing. By the way, is/was some of this article copied from 18th-century publications? Some of the writing is/was notably antiquated. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 07:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some rewriting of the older content, but apparently not enough. I totally agree with your removal of content like "saints' legends". I don't think I introduced anything that is antiquated, but I will take a spin through the article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  I made copy edits here. I think that's better. Feel free to make edits, too.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I made some more edits. Here's an updated diff.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law practice
Talk:Giovanni Antonio Orsini del Balzo

message: It is Tarent in English. The English name should be used. 62.78.104.103 23:06, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Taranto. Adam Bishop 03:25, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With feudal princes, the common practice in Wikipedia is to use their English names. Thus, we have Philip I, Duke of Burgundy (Philip I of Burgundy); not Philippe de Bourgogne, although Philip was certainly and fully French.
And, we have Frederick, Count of the Palatinate, not Graf Friedrich von der Pfalz. We have John, Count of Gravina; not Giovanni di Angio, conte di Gravina, here in English Wikipedia.
All native and other name forms then are explained in the text of the article.
John Anthony was also such a semi-independent, reigning feudal prince, not a regular nobleman.
Moreover, John Anthony was actually quite much French, not Italian: his principality was of Norman origin. His descent was from French (both del Balzo = des Baux and Enghien-Brienne). His claims were to certain frenchified principalities, such as Athens, Cyprus, Jerusalem. If we would like to use his family's language, he could be here Jean-Antoine de Tarent.
His name was usually in Italian vernacular "Gianantonio", not Giovanni Antonio. Thus, he actually was not mostly known by the name which the article title now gives.
However, we do not use French here, nor Italian. We use English, and only exemption could in this be if he were a fully Italian "lower" noble, not a feudal prince, and moreover best known in English literature with that fully Italian name form. That is not the case here, and therefore the article should be transferred to under english title. 62.78.106.188 13:35, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He's rather obscure, of course, but "Giantonio del Balzo Orsini" (or "Orsini del Balzo") is the only form of his name I can find in English texts. This is the relevant issue according to the Naming conventions page: the overall point, after all, is to file it in the place where English readers are most likely to find it, not to be pedantic about translation of names. The articles on the Medici are similar in aspect. (For that matter, his paternal line was that of the Orsini, a famous Italian dynasty.) And "Giovanni Antonio" seems to be more prevalent as a form of his name (even on Italian pages) than "Gianantonio", although a redirect from "Gianantonio del Balzo Orsini" would certainly be appropriate. Choess 15:03, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  name in Italian: why?
Talk:Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow

message: I've gotten permission from the owner of the site that I used. If there any other questions, email me at bestman56@hotmail.com
Before moving to VFD lets just figure out how much of this info we can rearrange into an existing article?
lots of issues  | leave me a message 23:47, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

message: On 28 May 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow for a record of the discussion.  Rossami (talk) 22:46, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  from VfD
Talk:ICC Men's Cricket World Cup Qualifier

message: This from Cricinfo :
Now the lure is the four-year investment from the ICC and one-day status, on top of the World Cup place. Five places are up for grabs in Ireland - the sixth slot is already guaranteed to Kenya as part of the sweetener for them losing their one-day membership - and those six will get all the benefits until the 2009 ICC Trophy when they will all have to qualify again.
Loganberry (Talk) 30 June 2005 03:31 (UTC)
That's cricinfo...the name is changed now...look here--Thugchildz 16:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kenya
Talk:Pleasant Hill, Kentucky

message: I'm continuing to expand this article. Anyone want to help out? --Tom Allen 23:46, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
* I've added some material with citations, but don't know sources of most of the info under Civil War and Reconstruction. If someone does know, please add citations!
* Also, I think the part on Shaker life needs to be incorporated in a section higher up, & made to sound more encyclopedia-ish. HollyJack (talk) 22:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Geo Prizm

message: Where was this car sold? I have seen one in Ireland, with an Irish number plate. At first I thought it was some screwy Japanese import (they're quite popular here), but then noticed it was left-hand drive. I thought it looked quite similar to the Corolla/Sprinter of the same era, which also confused the hell out of me... --Zilog Jones 23:51, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why isn't mileage in the 'generation' boxes along the right hand side?
Any car page should have mileage figures, as an aid to purchasers of used
cars. Wikip rhyre (talk) 22:10, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mileage 

message: Also, I think a source is needed on the MPG numbers presented here - I drive a 2001 Chevy Prizm and on regular unleaded I would say I get a hair under 30 MPG city.
--CoolGuyRH 21:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mpg 

message: Several statements in this article that seem to me to stray from NPOV.  I just removed the most glaring one ("Basically a perfectly good Toyota product ruined by GM parts.").  More work needed?
-Yes. Whoever wrote that apparently has some kind of problem with the Prizm for, I don't know, existing, essentially. Not only is that long-removed comment not fitting at all with NPOV, it is also factually incorrect. The Geo Prizm was always just a rebadged Toyota Corolla, no parts differences whatsoever but minor cosmetics. It is the same car as the Corolla, so nothing was "ruined." And while the Chevrolet Prizm did have a GM radio and air conditioning system, the entire rest of the car was a Toyota Corolla with only minor cosmetic differences. Virtually the same car as the Corolla, from beginning to end. --AC9016 (talk) 16:53, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Problems

message: Are most of the parts on 1998-2002 Prizms from GM or Toyota? I know Corolla and Prizm share same engines.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pam1855 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts
Talk:Orthodox Study Bible

message: This article says the complete OSB was released in February, but Amazon.com lists the publication date as "Thomas Nelson (June 17, 2008)" (both for the Leather and Hardcover editions, there isn't yet a softcover available).   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.59.228.204 (talk) 17:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was released in February, but there were some typos that resulted in a delay in printing that resulted in Amazon not shipping any copies until June. Frjohnwhiteford (talk) 11:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date?

message: Does anyone know what the canon of this bible will be? My understanding is that differing versions of Septuagint have different contents. --The One True Fred 08:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contents

message: The name of the book is "Orthodox Study Bible" yet this article has recently been moved from the namespace Orthodox Study Bible to the namespace Orthodox Study Bible (Eastern Orthodox).   As the book has the three word title and there is no other book by that same title, should or shouldn't it be moved back? Generally, unless there are compelling reasons (e.g., more than one book of the same name), Wikipedia articles about a book generally use the exact book title. --Aquarius Rising 00:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of Article

message: Think there is an error in Proverbs 11: 30 versus instead of 31. --N Jordan (talk) 07:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proverbs 11 Error

message: The Old Testament reference in Matthew 27:9-10 is a standard problem.  No Old Testament text matches these two verses.  Usually a text from Zechariah is referenced, but the NKJV references Jeremiah 32:6-9 -- in the Masoretic Text.  The Septuagint Jeremish is rather different, and the corresponding text in the Septuagint is in chapter 39.  The OSB preserves the NKJV footnote, with nothing to indicate that in this Bible Jeremiah has this text in another place.Ernest Miller (talk) 03:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matthew 27:9-10
Talk:Stupid (disambiguation)

message: If Wikipedia is not a dictionary, is it really necessary to mention the definition of the word in this article?? Georgia guy 00:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt that it is necessary. Nobody needs the definition to get to a topic they have in mind. When someone wants the definition they will look it up in the dictionary and only look here for more information if they want it and the definition doesn't add more. If anywhere it belongs in wiktionary. 83.138.172.79 (talk) 20:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looked on the history of this page and it's hilarious, people just add other people to this page, I'd never do such a thing. It's a good thing this page is protected. 87.254.67.181 (talk) 16:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: defintion of stupid Fayez
Slimkiller2324 (talk) 01:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. – 29611670.x (talk) 03:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 14 April 2013