Talk:Bhagavad-Gītā As It Is

message: I have moved these pages to a title that includes the dash but excludes the non-latin characters. If further moves are required DO NOT copy and paste the text or you lose the history from the page. Use the move button.GDallimore (Talk) 14:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving 

message: *Srila Prabhupad's translation in Bhagavad Gita As It Is in English poetry form 
--59.97.224.9 (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New external link?

message: according to some amazon reviews (http://www.amazon.com/Bhagavad-Gita-As-Bhaktivedanta-Swami-Prabhupada/dp/0892131233), some interpretations featured in this book may be biased (as most commentaries are); it would be nice for such statements to be reflected in the article. Twipley (talk) 03:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  criticisms (amazon) 

message: Recently, I was in a used book store and began comparing the older versions of the Bhagavad-Gītā As It Is with the newer version.  On the last page of the introduction, one can find a list entitled "The Disciplic Line of Succession".  Well, there were clearly 33 names listed under The Disciplic Line of Succession in the older version, but there are only 32 in the newer (current) version.  So, I went down each list and found the one that had been changed (and/or combined) from the two different versions.  As I recall, the inconsistency occurs around number 28. "(Baladeva) Jagannatha".  This is where it's confusing for me.  Is this a combination of Baladeva Vidyabhushana and Jagannatha dasa Babaji ?  They were clearly two different people, and one was not initiated by the other.  Baladeva studied under Visvanatha Chakravarti, who is listed as number 27 on The Disciplic Line of Succession, but Jagannatha accepted initiation (diksha) from Jagadananda Goswami, and later accepted Babaji initiation from Madhusudana dasa Babaji (and neither Jagadananda Goswami nor Madhusudana dasa Babaji are listed in The Disciplic Line of Succession).  So, I found this inconsistency to be quite interesting. 
I haven't had much luck finding more information about this online, or a direct lineage comparison and discussion regarding the two different lists, but I did find this:  Muralidhar das, of The Sampradaya Sun, wrote the following in this article:  "The Parampara list given by Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada in the introduction to Bhagavad Gita As It Is is the same list Srila Bhakti Siddhanta Saraswati Thakur gave in his commentary to Chaitanya Charitamrita. Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Maharaj Prabhupada listed the spiritual masters in his Guru Parampara as follows: '26) Narottama, 27) Visvanatha, 28) (Baladeva) Jagannatha'. It is to be noted that Narottama lived some two generations before Visvanatha and that Visvanatha lived two generations before Jagannatha das Babaji. Baladeva was a contemporary of Visvanatha. This list, therefore, is not a list of initiating Gurus and their direct disciples. Rather, it is a list of the most significant spiritual masters in the school of thought of Sri Chaitanya." Geneisner (talk) 22:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies regarding "The Disciplic Line of Succession" in ''Bhagavad-Gita As It Is'' 

message: *Indian Foreign Minister S. M. Krishna condemns a court case in Russia that could see the Gita holy book banned there. (BBC)
99.190.83.89 (talk) 09:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  potential resource from [[Portal:Current events/2011 December 20]] 

message: Can somebody please include an image of the cover of the original unabridged 1972 edition of the book? The existing image has a cover painting taken from the original hardback edition, but is an image of a later edition of the book.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.169.13 (talk) 11:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original 1972 Edition- cover 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bhagavad-Gītā as It Is. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111220143222/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Declare-Bhagavad-Gita-as-national-book-demands-BJP/Article1-784744.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Declare-Bhagavad-Gita-as-national-book-demands-BJP/Article1-784744.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120108011714/http://www.thestatesman.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=393903&catid=36 to http://www.thestatesman.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=393903&catid=36
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060112020030/http://vedabase.net/bg/4/13/en to http://vedabase.net/bg/4/13/en
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have read MOS:LWQ.
They are internal links; they cannot be mistaken for being part of the quotation, nor will they mislead, or confuse the reader.
-- Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated (talk) 05:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation & Links 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bhagavad-Gītā As It Is. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528180745/http://www.bbt.info/files/languages/Books_in_Print_JUN06.pdf to http://www.bbt.info/files/languages/Books_in_Print_JUN06.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified