Talk:Magic: The Gathering core sets, 1993–2007

message: I belive Revised and Summer Magic should be merged, I don't belive there is enough info out there on Summer Magic to warrent 2 articles. However combined, I belived that Revised could become a feature quality article with information from both. Alternate 4th Edition is combined with 4th Edition --Cloveious 04:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While the set consists of cards mirroring Revised, the same can be said for Beta and Unlimited.  I think Summer Magic has a unique enough history and difference in notable cards (compared to Revised) to warrant an article of its own.  I also think alternate 4th edition is a much more minor footnote in magic history compared to Summer Magic.  Crimson30 19:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged the two.  Summer magic's print run was identical to Revised, with no planned changes.  It was not intended to be marketed as anything other than Revised, as seen on the external link, the booster pack is labeled Revised.  In magic history, a print run that was largely recalled and unknown to the public could also be considered a minor footnote.-- Norvy (talk) 08:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Revised and Summer Magic

message: The article says
:the three-dimensional beveling of the cards was cropped out. 
could someone in some way change this sentense so it would be clear that this is the bevelling between the outer white border and the inner colored border?  There are also three-dimensional bevels around the illustration and around the text box which are not missing in this set.  Thanks.  – b_jonas 20:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bevelling 

message: At http://www.crystalkeep.com/magic/products/sixth.php it is noted that Sixth Edition boosters did not contain basic lands. However, Seventh Edition boosters did; I just bought a couple on my way home today. Thus, the article's claim that basic lands were re-introduced to core set booster packs with Eighth Edition was incorrect.
And, if you don't believe me, the presence of a basic land in 7th Edition booster packs is confirmed here:
http://www.crystalkeep.com/magic/products/seventh.php  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quadibloc (talk • contribs) 01:34, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic Land Cards 

message: This material was added to the article:
"Some little known facts about the starter decks are that they had 3 rares included in the very late print runs, up from two, as well as some decks that had all rares on the common card side of the rulebook.  The first hand information I have leads me to believe a starter box contained no more than two of these "super decks", if through rare occasion they were in the box.  This would make sense as the printing sheets would have left many extra rare cards leftover once printing was complete and rather than waste them, surprise a few lucky players."
It is unsourced, but anyway interesting (if it is not an april fool's joke). With some sources it would be nice to have this in the article, but right now it reads like a mix of speculation and original research. OdinFK (talk) 08:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced content about Starters 

message: I think it's notable that the Fourth Edition was the first core set with a new white mana symbol. Compare this to this. I believe the first set with the new symbol was Ice Age, but I'm not 100% sure and I don't know if the gatherer is enough of a source.--Letkhfan (talk) 17:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: While the Gatherer is a valid source, it is also a primary source which most of the Magic articles are not in any need of. Secondary sources are of high priority on any Magic article and I recommend finding one of those instead. Ultimately, if you can't find one (which I'd be surprised if one didn't exist), you can use a primary source, though I don't think the Gatherer itself is ideal. Leitmotiv (talk) 21:31, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of the white mana symbol with Fourth Edition 

message: A nomination can be found here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 February 16#Category:Magic: The Gathering blocks to merge Magic categories back to blocks from sets. Feel free to join in on the discussion. Leitmotiv (talk) 18:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic categories to be merged back to block structure discussion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Magic: The Gathering core sets, 1993–2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120629011251/http://www.magiclibrarities.net/rarities-summer.html to http://www.magiclibrarities.net/rarities-summer.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion