lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zadkiel

message: This is an interesting link  which may detail the link between Zadkiel, Jupiter, Abraham, and the Angel of the Lord. Lisa the Sociopath 01:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 

message: The site claims to have no affiliations with any organization but is registered by Allen Buresz of Natural Health L.P. in Virginia. Checking the Virginia company records online, no such limited partnership has been registered as active. Consequently the registration is suspect with apparently false information. The site appears to be another rambling self-published and self-promotional site with no claim as to status or validity. It does not meet the guidance for wp:reliable sources and should not be used as a source, ever, by anyone.—Ash (talk) 08:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using ascension-research.org as a source 

message: This site fails WP:RS, WP:SPAM, WP:ELNO and WP:SPS as it is a promotional website for Elizabeth Clare Prophet. The site promotes and sells her books, CD and courses. The site cannot be considered a reliable source for evidence and is not independent. It should not be used as a reference.—Ash (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using tsl.org as a source
Talk:Slipstream (science fiction)

message: In my opinion it might be acceptable and possibly better to dismerge/seperate some of the articles in this topic.  Such as the section talking about slipspace travel in the Halo Universe due to lengh and difference of this section compared to the others. Rearete 22:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The sections don't look so different to me. It's all basically the same science-fiction concept. Plus, I don't think this article is long enough to seriously consider splitting it. The new articles created would have to become stubs. -- Lilwik 22:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperation 

message: Currently the introduction says that the term is used in David Brin's Uplift series.  But the rest of the article describes its use everywhere else except in David Brin's Uplift series.  Either the intro needs to be changed to describe how the term is used more broadly than just David Brin's Uplift series, or something about David Brin's Uplift series needs to be added to the main body of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.177.1.212 (talk) 20:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: Should Star Trek Discovery's "Mushroom Drive" be included here?  I haven't watched the series, so don't know the specifics of how it's supposed to work. Jimw338 (talk) 22:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mushroom Drive" in Star Trek Discovery?
Talk:Lục bát

message: There are more rules to thơ lục bát than this simple rhyme scheme. The tones of the syllables are very important, if the tones are off then the poem would not sound like thơ lục bát. 
Oh yeah in Vietnamese poetry, two words are considered "rhymes" only when their tones are from the same tone category. For example, hoán and khoan are not rhymes because their tones are from different categories.
I'm going to edit this page, ok? Sunnyrain90 (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rules

message: I've concocted a scansion for the "first type" of luc bat.  I believe this shows a little more clearly the whole structure of the lines; if not it should be reverted. If there are not objections, I will shortly add a similar table for the "second type". Phil wink (talk) 22:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scansion
Talk:Decentralized computing

message: These pages seem to be on the same topic but with different spellings of 'decentralised' and a slightly different name. I suggest merging Decentralised computer system into this page as this page has more information.
Also does decentralised computing have anything to do with distributed computing and should this be linked or merged?
Lettyce 07:48, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that they should be merged.  I also think that we should remove Decentralized computing from :Category:Centralized computing and  simply  refer to the category as an antonym.   Bartledan (talk) 15:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would second that. --mgarde (talk) 13:52, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

text:  Having recently (2009) written a thesis that makes extensive use of "decentralized" to refer to an hybrid of a peer-to-peer system and a client-server system with a very thin server-side, and having done my share of reading papers, I can say that this term doesn't seem currently notorious even in papers, and thus seems kind of irrelevant for an encyclopedia. I'm speaking as someone that actually likes this term. What I mean is that, currently, this term seems to have little usage and, as a consequence, you end up having to define it explicitly whenever you use it. I like the term, but I don't like the current page, and I don't think I'd have material to write a general article about it either. EDIT: note that the references of this article say "peer-to-peer" and "distributed" in their titles... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.88.185 (talk) 03:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

text:  There is a clear nuance between decentralised and distributed networks: decentralised means "without a center", while distributed means "spread out over several nodes". For instance, the whole cloud ecosystem is distributed (comprising many computers) but very centralised: it's the service provider (e.g. Amazon Web Services) that coordinates the whole ecosystem. On the other hand, the e-mail system is decentralised (and distributed): there are many mail providers (yahoo.com, google.com, or any private mail server), but no central entity coordinating how mails are sent/received worldwide. This page belongs on its own. I will try to clarify it when I get time. --Le Zinzographe (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Moritz Güdemann

message: "Jerusalem, die Apfer und die Orgel" -- the third word should be OpferS. Valkemirer (talk) 00:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done. "Orgel" is what the Jewish Encyclopedia says, and also what the biography of Güdermann by Ismar Schorsch says. Zerotalk 04:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

text: Yes you are right. I read it as a complaint about the last word. Zerotalk 12:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misprint: Apfer
Talk:Bonita High School

message: Unclear what "lesser of the two comprehensive schools in Bonita Unified School District" means.  Does this concern enrollment numbers, or is it a biased judgment call?  PaddyO (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Patriarchs (Bible)

message: In the bar chart, Adam's age was listed as 929.  According to both the article and the NRSV, his age is 930.  I have changed that.  Genesis may not be a reliable source as to ages of historical figures, but it is the reliable source as to what Genesis says?
===Chart Colors===
The color of the bars for the ages of the patriarchs in the Masoretic Text does not match the legend at the bottom of the chart.  Can someone take a look at it?
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless this chart can be credited to a WP:Reliable source, it's WP:Original Research. Editor2020 03:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I got the information from Jaco Gericke's PhD thesis. Abyssal (talk) 04:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit and Question 

message: The color of the bars for the ages of the patriarchs in the Masoretic Text does not match the legend at the bottom of the chart.  Can someone take a look at it?
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless this chart can be credited to a WP:Reliable source, it's WP:Original Research. Editor2020 03:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I got the information from Jaco Gericke's PhD thesis. Abyssal (talk) 04:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Chart Colors

message: My addition of a See Also link to Wikipedia's article on Hayflick Limit has been deleted by an editor identifying him or herself as LacrimosaDiesIlla.  This editor's characterization of Hayflick Limit is that it is subject matter "unrelated" to the herein article on biblical patriarchs.  Excuse me, but I don't think that the claims in the Book of Genesis regarding the lifespans of the patriarchs should go unchallenged.  A See Also link to the Hayflick Limit article is a straightforward and eminently relevant answer to such outlandish claims of human longevity.  Otherwise what are we surrendering to here academically?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.41.117.182 (talk) 06:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also <I>Hayflick Limit</I>
Talk:Our Lady of La Vang

message: when did this take place? Arthurian Legend (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  when? 
Talk:Flying Steps

message: The very first line in this article says that they originated in 2008, Perhaps there's a need for some explanation on that since there are singles dated before 2008 or it is just wrong and it is not year 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.57.211 (talk) 12:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origination
Talk:Dudael

message: (Bare with me on the Azazael thing, I know Azazel is more recognized now but I am too used to the old way)
I cannot quote so well, I have not read much in about 3 years on this. I think you will find Dudael is n old pre-Egypt desert in that region that Azazael was first banished to. The story refers to covering Azazaels' face as if a metaphor for banishing him from the Divine. He lived in Dudael for a long time, and impregnated a human woman. It was at the fear the childs' birth would open this realm to the entire Grigori and Nephilim to find a home on the mortal realm that the womans' father, also the high priest of Dudael took her life to prevent the child from being born. Killing the child was said to break Azazaels' connection to this realm, banishing to the final realm.  Daemonic spawning next of which was corrupted by him and his followers. This was the birthing of Hell. Officially no story says that the other 2, Lucifer and Suriel (Grigotri leaders from the 7 great Archangel) were directly banished, it is said the 3 shared the same chains, and with one being sent away all were dragged down. 
If you can find reference material on a people called "The Forgotten" it is said they fought a Demon that existed before this corruption. But this is an occultic myth about 3,500 years old, were as the birthing of hell and banishment of the Grigori is believed to of happened 6,000 years ago.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaosa (talk • contribs) 12:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it's really late for this, but here are the reliable source guidelines. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is it?

message: Some unanswered studies done in the north, do seem connected to the lands Enoch wrote about.  What if the book, Enoch wrote, referring to Dudael, is Hudson Bay?  People living around this area, have a history, with shamanism, and unimaginable human strength.  Extensive knowledge of the great flood, predicting atmospheric conditions, living on the lands where mass migrations go to, sounds a lot like Hudson Bay area, with Albertosaurus, being buried at the "Oil sands" area.
How can this be?  It refers that there are precious metals abundant around this Dudael, just like the lands surrounding the Hudson Bay, has more than enough precious metals under it's lands, including various Provinces surrounding the bay.
South of this, are there red rocks?  Like the grand canyon?
Where the area will be frozen?  Hudson Bay freezes annually.  Would welcome any thoughts.  ````— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arviatlands (talk • contribs) 18:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:No original research and WP:NOTFORUM. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:18, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Follow the trail
Talk:Penemue

message: The link given in the External Links section is broken. KatherinaXC (talk) 03:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it, since the title gives me the impression it was just some artist's personal site (failing WP:ELNO). Ian.thomson (talk) 03:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link
Talk:Sir Wilfrid Laurier Secondary School (London, Ontario)

message: French kids are much smarter than the English kids.  Stats don't lie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.212.235 (talk) 04:27, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Demographic 

message: I go to Laurier and I can certainly tell you that it is nowhere near a French Immersion school. This information is wrong and should be changed.
I believe it should be changed to an english Secondary School that offers French Immersion classes instead of the other way around. Mark77711 (talk) 00:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Immersion Status 

message: I was not aware that the acceptance average requirement for this position was so low.  Increase to at least a 75% or else you'd be giving Laurier a bad name, whether or not you're that low anyways.--174.91.52.70 (talk) 01:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the point of including this information anyway? Every school has a student council, there's nothing really interesting about it. This isn't the school's blog page or something. Adam Bishop (talk) 09:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deputy Prime Minister 

message: No inline cites, most of the body seems to be original research, and the tone and style do not follow WP:MOS. Also, I am not even convinced that this school meets the requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia, specifically WP:Notability. I was considering nominating for deletion, but wanted to post here first to see if any editors wanted to try and improve it first.  Air  ♠  Combat What'sup, dog? 18:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major overhaul required
Talk:The Federal Farmer

message: In case anyone was wondering, the spelling foederal was once a common alternate; it's a relic of etymology.  —Tamfang 08:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  foederal 

message: I have rated this article as B-class, however, I'd bet it could make good article status if anybody cares to nominate it. Bsimmons666 (talk) 01:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: When referring to Pickering's letter, it states that "this was never published".  It may not have been published at the time, but it has been published recently by the Library of America in their work Debate on the Constitution (pp. 289-304).  I would like to correct this, but I don't know what DHRC is, so editing may affect previous citations.  Any ideas what DHRC stands for?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Occidensylvania (talk • contribs) 18:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It stands for the Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution. I've clarified this point anyway, the relevant bit is that it was not published contemporarily. Christopher Parham (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication and contemporary reaction
Talk:Belfield, Dublin

message: Not really a "residential area", is it? And the third photo is awful, surely someone at UCD can make a better?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.123.209.196 (talk) 23:44, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I've lots and I thought that one was the best! Sarah777 (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would Belfield be considered a townland? --Daysleeper47 (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Townland 
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 646

message: This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:04, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: USRD GA audit
Talk:Newlands College

message: Just added teachers to the school Druchii chosen of khainei 08:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teachers 

message: The Newlands College school office photo is clearly not the school office but I am unsure how to change it. Delille (talk) 00:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Newlands College school office photo 

message: There is a list of major productions in the Arts section. I think the productions are a key part of Newlands college. Perhaps a separate section could be created, also containing a table? Listing all the major productions could be  a pain.
Also, what defines a production as major? There is a physical board in the school hall foyer which displays major productions.
Jayden Silvernz (talk) 06:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Productions into a table 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Coll. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New Coll" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Wally Heider

message: Where did the content go?
:LOL. It hasn't been written yet. Got too busy with work... I'll try and flesh more of this out in the next few days. Binksternet 18:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where did the content go?

message: This article badly needs a photo. There needs to be a section discussing Heider's legacy or influence. There should be a boatload of references. The plain list of clients, recordings, employees and associates needs to be fleshed out in chronological order and in prose form. Binksternet (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To Do list

message: The article claimed that Heider was a recording engineer for major sessions in the big band era. His interview at the Wally Heider website puts the lie to that claim. He started much later. Tapered (talk) 08:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed BS

message: Does /* Musicians, Albums, Concerts */ section describe his work personally or that of his studio? Also, the list should be ordered in some obvious way (alphabetically? chronologically?) and, of course, there should be sources. Maurice3M (talk) 13:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* Musicians, Albums, Concerts */
Talk:Hideyuki Ashihara

message: Hi all, 
I have just cleaned up the page by creating headers (of which none were present before) and touched up on the language and phrasing to the best of my abilities. 
I tried not to change too much of the language as I am afraid it may alter the intended meaning, so for those who are more knowledgeable on the subject, please do take a look. 
It also seems like more citations are needed for certain claims. Should such a notice be placed on the page? 
More photos and more information would be nice as well. 
Thanks. -- Sentimex (talk) 09:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning Up of Page
Talk:Henry Russell (explorer)

message: I wonder about the name of the third cave at Cerbillona. The first was villa Russell, the second, the Guides... and in France we know the third as Grotte des Dames : Ladies cave, and not Blessed. Morburre (talk) 09:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info, I've made the change. Ericoides (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The blessed ? 
Talk:Assyro-Babylonian religion/Archive 1

message: Are we now ready to move this to ancient Assyrian religion? Naturally, proponents of the Ashurism haven't found any evidence for it as a technical term. Once moved, the article would need to be written properly, and, perhaps, have a section mentioning that modern Assyrians have coined the term Ashurism to refer to the religion of ancient Assyria. I think that's all above board and reflects the reality of the situation. Once again, I say that Wikipedia is here to present a reflection of the facts as best known, not to make a new understanding of them. — Gareth Hughes 00:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Ashurism" is a term like Odinism or Hellenismos, and may have neopagan implications. Ashur may get his own section, but it is pointless to treat "Assyrian religion" apart from Babylonian-Assyrian polytheism in general. dab (𒁳) 11:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are we ready to move this? 

message: It seems that Tourskin has found some interesting concepts of how the ancient Assyrians viewed their Kings (servants of Ashur). I think this should be included in the article. — EliasAlucard|Talk 12:44 11 Aug, 2007 (UTC)
: Yes I will be on it ASAP. So no one do nothing!Tourskin 16:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More material
Talk:Tiptoe

message: The section on rotation seems to be a mix of fact and folklore.  Reducing contact area does not reduce frictional force.  However, standing on one foot might increase rotation due to (1) reducing the radius at which frictional force is applied, thereby decreasing its torque, and (2) reducing the moment of inertia by concentrating mass near the center of rotation.  This needs some cleanup. 73.170.41.47 (talk) 07:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physics of rotation
Talk:Walkinstown

message: Well done to the anonymous editor who has, with clear local knowledge, substantially improved this article.  Referencing welcome also...  SeoR (talk) 12:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good edit series! 

message: The article contains 10 sections including the lead and 1,360 words – but only four citations (February 2022). The whole thing is built on a swamp with no firm foundation. Who was bribed to provide planning permission for this imperilled structure? O'Dea (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is a swamp cabin
Talk:Kore (sculpture)

message: I think this article to the version in use until mid-November, as recent edits are utterly misleading.  
* Kore statues are NOT normally considered to represent Persephone/Kore or her attendants. It is, in fact, hotly disputed whom they depict, even whether they depict deities or mortals. 
*It is not clear that all were colourful, nor that their skin was always unpainted. 
*Lacking significant large-scale Minoan sculpture, there is no evidence that Archaic sculpture is derived from it. If there is an Egyptian influence on Greek Archaic art, is much more likely to be direct.
*The "lady of Auxerre" is indeed famous, but it is also exceptional, belonging to the Daedalic style of Cretan art. Being untypical, it is not a good candidate for the best known kore. Textbooks almost always illustrate the Peplos kore (see  below). 
* The Peplos (not Peplum) kore is not in Munich but in the Acropolis Museum at Athens. 
* The Munich reconstruction of the painted version of the peplos kore is a striking image, but perhaps we should also show an image of what korai look like now.
athinaios (talk) 13:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major issues with recent edit
Talk:Imbruglia

message: Since this surname is overwhelmingly associated with one subject, it seems appropriate to me to redirect to the primary topic/most likely search target, Natalie Imbruglia, with a  tag from that article for the lesser-known sister Laura Imbruglia (assuming she meets WP:BIO's threshold for inclusion). --Muchness 09:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect