Talk:Bokurano

message: I'm not exactly sure who wrote the majority of this article, but at least one major contributor to this article, possibly others, appears to not know the difference between "it's" (it is) and "its" (belonging to it). I just cleaned up 62 instances of "it's" where "its" was meant, which is entirely excessive. There is absolutely no excuse for grammar that poor. Please run spell check on your submissions before you post them here. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia. Firsfron of Ronchester 23:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar and spelling

message: There is a clear NPOV issue in the section on the "controversy" between the anime director and the writer of the original anime. First and foremost, Wikipedia is not a place to prove a point. Articles need to present a neutral point of view, i.e. let the facts speak for themselves and understand the proper way characterize opinions of people's work--be they opinions of the wider public or of a recognized expert. Understanding the proper way to do this, with the help of in-text citations, of course, helps you achieve fairness of tone.
I deleted a phrase indicating that the anime director's public dislike of the manga was a negative thing. Even though you may think so and I may think so, those are both just opinions. These opinions can be expressed (as aforementioned and previously linked), but they must be done in ways that properly characterize people's artistic work, as illustrated in the [[policy page on that subject. That policy page on neturality simply details the minimum requirements for expressing something in a way that is verifiable. That will necessarily involve simply stating the facts and citing reliable sources.
I also added a fact marker in the last paragraph since it appears to be original research. This can be fixed by finding reliable sources to substantiate your opinion and then just stating the facts. Cheers, ask123 14:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there's a few things here and there, for example (going to go with stuff that's adptations); the production rights to Full Metal Panic was moved to Kyoto Animation after the first season (They did Fumofuu and Second Raid), Gantz was most defently under the point of "made up for the anime ending" and Hellsing (Second half was "Made up" as they ran though the entire Manga's source that quickly) to name a few. Even some of the stuff that's of thier own design ended up being what could be noted as a mess, the most notible being Final Fantasy Unlimited.Conan-san 12:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok, thanks. You can keep it in there though if it's rewritten with sourcing. Also, this isn't a matter of you having one opinion and me having another. We actually share the same opinion here. It just isn't right to put it on Wikipedia. People won't take the rest of the page seriously if even a small portion of it is sugared up up with opinions and personal feelings. ask123 19:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality Problem

message: Is there a reason why there isn't a space separating the words Bokura and no? —Tokek 20:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why it's bokurano and not bokura no, as it should be. But since the manga and anime are officially called "bokurano" -- one word -- it's proper to keep it like this. ask123 (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not 100% certain, as I'm only ~JLPT3 (maybe 2.5), but I believe the Japanese typically consider markers like 'no' to be part of the preceding word. i.e. "Bokurano" "Fullmoonwo Sagashite" and such as logic. (source for this concept is primary; a half-Japanese friend of mine) I don't know what Wiki's policy is on romanization really, but saw the comment and though I could help clarify a bit. Aidolon 03:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Normally, per Wikipedia's style guidelines for Japanese, it would be Bokura no, but even before the Viz title made it officially Bokurano, that romanization was appearing on promotional materials for the series, so it was already a more or less official spelling. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's because Japanese doesn't have spaces, so romanization done by a Japanese person can lack them in the proper places. The proper way to do it would be "Bokura no."  The creators were just wrong about a writing system that wasn't made for their language.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.13.240.161 (talk) 15:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also possible that the author preferred "Bokurano" without space so that it would be another 4 syllable (well, mora) title (like "Narutaru", for example). Erigu (talk) 08:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bokurano, not Bokura no? 

message: Please see Talk:List of Bokurano robots#Reference needed for the names of the robots --Acepectif (talk) 13:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of the robots 

message: *CBB: vol. 2 vol. 3 vol. 3 other reviewer
*ANN: Right Turn only vol. 2 Right Turn only vol. 3
*Mania.com: vol. 2 
*CBR: vol. 1-2 
--KrebMarkt (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bokurano: Ours. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070304225443/http://www.ikki-para.com/comix/bokurano.html to http://www.ikki-para.com/comix/bokurano.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified