lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bermondsey Abbey

message: In the Archeological  / Reports section towards the end, the text currently says: "The report for the current dig is not online as of March 2006 but should be published here."
I can't see which of the multiple reports on the linked page is most relevant here. There is a general summary of work done in Bermondsey Square that might be relevant:
http://www.pre-construct.com/Sites/Highlights/Bermondsey.htm
Anyone know if any particular report was intended as the link?
Dcorney (talk) 11:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Archeological reports

message: I reverted recent edits by 88.108.228.33, principally because I was unable to verify a reference underpinning the introduction of doubt concerning the identity of "Vermundesei" with Bermondsey. I was unable to find the cited source "T Sharp: 'Origins of Christianity in Surrey 2011'", but an online search led me to a "Tony Sharp" who has papers on similar subjects posted to Academia.edue.g. the first of that writer's papers listed there is entitled "The Seventh Century Conversion of Surrey and Southwark". I believe that Academia.edu is not a reliable source; but of course, if anyone can identify the cited source published in a WP:RS format, then this information can be restored. Other information added in the relevant edits, concerning a putative "Ailwyn civic dynasty", looks like WP:OR: compare the above topic, "Founded in 1082 or 1089?" Nortonius (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/88.108.228.33 88.108.228.33]
Talk:Krabi province

message: What is wrong with links to external sites with relevant photos? Especially if the Wiki article doesn't include any photos and that article is about an area known for it's scenic beauty. 
The official Thai tourism website is OK but not so good that other sites with good additional resources should be ignored.  
The external link "Golden Jubilee Network province guide" seems pointless. The site contains no information!
:Almost all external links added here have very few additional info to what is in the TAT website, but are very commercial instead. Then it gets difficult to say which is allowed and which not - and as Wikipedia is not a weblink directory less is better than too many. The "Golden Jubilee Network" is currently empty, that's right, but that's because the webmaster there seems incompetent. However at the time of originally writing this article it contained very good stuff, and that was used as source for writing the article. I have however now added the link to commons, our own photo repository. andy 13:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Todax I reverted the edits of User:Chompooh done on 11. February 2008 because of suspected copyvio. 
I found parts of his edits on a certain webpage (http://www.krabi-hotels.com/info/people.htm). --hdamm (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits of User:Chompooh 
Talk:Salt water taffy

message: I think it'd be worth looking into whether there was actually a Supreme Court case. This from the American Dialect Society (and some of my own brief followup) makes it seem like the "Supreme Court" mention was actually a misidentification. It might have just been a Patent Office ruling. If I have spare time I'll look into this, but I might not get around to it. Ando228 18:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been unable to locate any Supreme Court opinion from that period which mentions "taffy", so I think that the cited article most likely misinterpreted the case. I'll change the article. Sneftel (talk) 08:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Supreme Court or Patent Ruling?

message: What is the difference between salt water taffy and regular taffy? Neither this article or the "Taffy" article explain the division. Trcunning 16:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  salt water vs regular taffy
Talk:Electron counting

message: This page is getting a bit messy, the 8VE rule is the octet rule and already discussed in that article, should not be restated, the Wade's rules should be in the Polyhedral skeletal electron pair theory see the borane page.  Would these points be sensible modifications? V8rik 21:16, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octet rule and electron counting 

message: I see only the neutral counting is explained, should 'ionic counting' (correct name?) also be included? --Dirk Beetstra 22:14, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ionic and Neutral counting has been worked out. Dirk Beetstra 07:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ionic vs. Neutral counting 

message: TiCl4 is a fully stable compound, full stop.  Yes like many other compounds, it reacts with water.  Also the implication that octet molecules are more stable is dubious, although such comments are comforting to beginning students who want to also believe that the 18e rule prevails more than it does. Similarly, we dont say that CH4 reacts violently with O2?  Or is SF6, a serious violator of the octet rule, is unstable.  But the cmpd is incredibly stable.  We need to be careful to explain stability. .  Ferrocene is unstable in air (heat of combustion is quite favorable). --Smokefoot 13:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I did not look at it in this way.  I will be more careful with these statements. --Dirk Beetstra 14:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Apparently we need to define stability

message: I made a few changes, One was the changing of Period 3 to Period 4. Looking at a periodic table you can see the atoms listed are from Period 4 not 3. I also added Sc to the list because skipping this element could confuse elementary chemistry students who are not intimately familiar with the periodic table. Also, I added the H+ fragment to the list of fragments, because it is mentioned in the examples but is not listed in the table. For an elementary chemistry student who is going by the table. When they see H donating two electrons they may not realize that it is for a special case of H (the Hydride ion). This would then result in some confusion for them if they are trying to learn ionic counting.--PedroDaGr8 20:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Counting and Fragments 

message: Prof. Ged Parkin sent me an email with some references which, he thinks, could be used to upgrade this article.  Please have a look:
* J. Chem. Educ., 2006, Vol 83, p 791
* A chapter in 'Classification of Organometallic Compounds', 1.01, 2007
* Polyhedron 2004, 23, 2879-2900.  
(He is co-author in all three of them, it seems best that I suggest them here).  --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some references suggested by [[Gerard Parkin]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by UBC24 AT (talk) 04:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300
Talk:Madhouse on Castle Street

message: :: This play was, and still is called, "Madhouse On Castle Street" not, "The" Madhouse On Castle Street. Lion King 21:20, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I thought, but the IMDb had no entry under that title so I went with their phrasing when I created the article. Angmering 11:27, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: *Observer
*The Independent
*Sunday Telegraph
Will see what I can do with these over the next few days. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I shall be on holiday from Sunday 31 January to Sunday 14 February, with intermittent internet access as best, so if a review is started during that time, please allow me to respond on my return. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am now back. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Nomination 

message: "The Observer, in 2005, reports that the play "got strinking reviews" according to folk singer Martin Carthy"
I don't know if strinking means striking, stinking, or is some British word I am unfamiliar with. WesUGAdawg (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A typo, I fixed it , thanks for pointing it out. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:59, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: From listening to an audio recording of the programme it seems that, like Dylan, his chacter can only communicate in song.  Near the end of the story the other characters, getting exasperated with Bobby's inability to communicate properly, try to get him to speak.  He tries, but only manages gibberish.  I'd have thought that was worthy of mention. --Deke42 (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you got a reliable source that says that or is it just your interpretation? Jezhotwells (talk) 22:59, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dylan's character
Talk:Castrovalva (Doctor Who)

message: Castrovalva is also a lithograph by M.C. Escher, leading me to believe that the name must have some other historical or mythical origin.
:The Escher painting may do, but the title of this story is taken directly from the Escher painting, given as it deals with recursion as a theme, like much of Escher's work. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 15:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source of name?

message: How is it not a catchphrase?  Pertwee said "Reverse the polarity" a number of times, and said the whole line at least twice.  (Which is more the Sherlock Homes ever said "elementary my dear Watson.)Algr 08:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Tim's meaning is that to simply say it's a catchphrase implies that the Third Doctor said it all the time (which is not entirely accurate, since he only said the whole thing twice - reversing the polarity is more correct). The edit as it stands, however, covers both ends, namely, that it was used by other incarnations. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 08:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

text: The second time Pertwee said "Reverse the polarity of the neutron flow" (which was always assumed to be the phase - "reverse the polarity" is up there with just "elementary" which I recall Holmes did say at least once) it was in The Five Doctors rather than his own era. The three uses in the 1980s are meant to be nostalgic references, albeit based on the false supposition that Pertwee had actually said it a lot in his era (the myth is repeated as late as the 1992 book The Universal Databank, the 1993 radio play The Paradise of Death and the 1994 trading cards). From the point of view of Castrovalva it's not so important as to just how often it was said (the link to the Third Doctor's page handles that) as that it's meant to be invoking the earlier incarnation. Timrollpickering 12:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Third doctor's catchphrase 

message: No offence to the editors who've worked on it, but this article is a bit wall-of-text-y. --86.112.234.225 21:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall of text 

message: Can someone explain why this line is so infamous? Winterspell (talk) 06:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nyssa - "I know so little about telebiogenesis" 

message: There are four articles on 'Castrovalva': the village, the Escher lithograph depicting the village, the Dr. Who serial influenced by the lithograph, and the band. It seems odd that the Dr. Who serial should be treated as the primary topic, so I suggest that this is moved to Castrovalva (Doctor Who) over the redirect, with a disambiguation page at Castrovalva. Any objections?--Michig (talk) 06:51, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any objections I've gone ahead and moved it.--Michig (talk) 08:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Castrovalva (Doctor Who)]]
Talk:Four to Doomsday

message: *Bigon contradicts himself...first he says that Monarch plans to conquer Earth with a poison that causes matter to shrink in on itself and reduce people to the size of a grain of salt, then when Tegan asks if Monarch will kill them if they refuse to aid in his cause, Bigon says, "it is not death, first you are hypnotized and made to recall all your life, it is recorded and microchipped and then your body is destroyed and you are remade as I am!" Another contradiction is that Bigon tells the Doctor that Monarch polluted and destroyed Urbanka with his technology in his attempt to go back to the Big Bang and beyond to meet himself because he believes he is "God".  If Urbanka was destroyed then, how could Bigon and the remaining Androids take the ship back to Urbanka?
How does Bigon contradict himself?  Monarch wants to destroy the earth, yeah, but he doesn't want to kill the doctor and his lot, he just wants to turn them into robots.  Plus, this is so not how you write an encyclopaedic article.Andral 03:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kinda (Doctor Who)

message: Does anyone know whether Christopher Bailey has acknowledged The Word for World is Forest as a source for "Kinda", in the way that Terrance Dicks acknowledged "King Kong" as a source for "Robot", etc.? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 22:36, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Le Guin influence 

message: :For the scene in episode 2 in which the two Tegans talk to each other about which of them is real, John Nathan-Turner allowed Janet Fielding to write her own dialogue
This statement needs to be backed up since it seems unlikely that an important scene would be just left to the actress to make up lines for. Not only that but why would the producer be saying this - surely this would be down to the script editor or director. I've tagged the statement to see if someone can come up with a source for it.Tuzapicabit (talk) 09:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure they say it on the commentary Babelcolour5 (talk) 04:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They don't. I've removed the item. 67.174.11.184 (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 
Talk:Winpcap

message: No, this page should not be merged with tcpdump.  WinPcap is a library for packet capture (a port of libpcap to Windows); tcpdump is a packet capture program that uses libpcap (the WinDump port of tcpdump uses WinPcap).  Perhaps this page should be merged with the page for libpcap - and the page for pcap.
Unless somebody explains why they believe this page should be merged with tcpdump rather than, say, libpcap, I'll assume they were confused, and will change the suggestion to say it should perhaps be merged with libpcap. Guy Harris 21:23, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, I didn't see the libpcap entry, yeah, that makes more sense.  Alternatively, this article could stand alone, but both it and libpcap are fairly short, and there's no irreversible harm to merging them.  --Interiot 22:35, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Time-Flight

message: This statement under continuity:
The Doctor also wishes he'd brought his scarf - the time period they travel to is coming up to the Ice Age - forgetting that he left it on Earth before the true events of Castrovalva.
is incorrect.  I just re-watched the serial this morning, and what the Doctor said was "It's times like this I wish I still had my scarf."  There's no reason to extrapolate from that statement that he has forgotten it was no longer available, only that he was wishing it were.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.31 (talk) 16:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. DonQuixote (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The scarf comment 

message: As I understand it, Time-flight is generally regarded as one of the worst Doctor Who stories. I was surprised to find there was no mention of that fact here. Should there be? It seems notable. IGN's professional review, for one, mentions it: . Even the BBC's official site is pretty critical of the story: , and I just finished watching the "Mawdryn Undead" commentary, where Peter Davison himself repeatedly alludes to it/criticizes it. Does all this make it relevant enough to mention? --Fru1tbat (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It does seem at times like an advertisement for British Airways, but the real objectionable content is Ainley's performance being based on the basest of Asian stereotypes. John Bennett seemed far more respectful of the ethnicity of the character he portrayed in The Talons of Weng-Chiang.--69.124.112.126 (talk) 08:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception?
Talk:Resurrection of the Daleks

message: Did the production team actually say that Kamelion and the second K-9 were accidental omissions? Leela was, but Kamelion had barely been in more than one story and they may well have decided that showing two slightly different K-9s would be silly. Are we using erroneous in the sense that they meant to include a companion and forgot (as with Leela), or in the more POV sense that we think those should have been there but they weren't? --Whouk (talk) 23:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Erroneous" companion omissions 

message: As this was before leslie grantham became famous, does he really count as a special guest?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.111.211 (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special Guests

message: Firstly I can't find any media reports on the body count being notably high.  Secondly The Terminator has an on-screen body count of 28.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/trivia Thus unless someone can rustle up some media or other noteworthy analysis of what constitutes a high body count (40-odd humans lasered or shot with magic bullets that produce no blood is more note-worthy than some other count somewhere else...?) then I propose this section regarding The Terminator be deleted, and we leave the reference in the production notes section that gives the accurate body count.  Finally I find this body count thing quite irrelevent, I don't see Star Wars being critisied for entire planets being blown up on screen, yet 20-odd Daleks is notable? ;-) --Ant (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Body Count
Talk:Planet of Fire

message: If anyone can find a better link than the one I posted for the Davison/Bryant James Bond photo, please feel free to replace the one here. I can't direct-link the photo because the hosting website does not allow this, so you have to hunt the index for the image. I've seen the picture printed in a book but this site is the only online source I could find. 23skidoo 02:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: James Bond photo

message: Query this:
*Nicola Bryant was cast in part because she held dual citizenship in the United States and the UK (because she was married to an American)
Surely this is not the only reason for her casting? Even her strongest detractors would at least admit there were clearly two completely different reasons, at least, for her casting. Dual citizenship hardly seems crucial since she was English and the show was made in England. Format (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Query?

message: Not one line in these paragraphs is sourced and a lot of it is decidedly trivial fanwankery.  Last male companion until Adam?  Really, who cares?  First bikini since Sarah Jane Smith?  How the hell is either of these "continuity"?  "First"/"last" cruft belongs on fan sites. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuity issues

message: : Writing for Radio Times, Patrick Mulkern gave the serial three stars out of five and observed that writer Peter Grimwade "laces his script with homosexual subtext", noting in particular the "male eye candy on display"
:The director was a woman. If there's a lot of "male eye candy" on display then it all seems rather heterosexual. Perhaps, as an equally unfounded accusation, one could say that Patrick Mulkern was being mysogynistic in implying that a female director doesn't actually direct in the manner of her own choosing. 92.24.207.218 (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Male eye candy"
Talk:KTH Royal Institute of Technology

message: The original name of the school was Teknologiska institutet and not Tekniska högskolan i Stockholm. The latter name has never been the official name. I believe it came into use when Kungliga (Royal) seemed unmodern. The spelling Technologiska institutet where also used, but this seems to only have been due to the general lack of standardized spelling in Sweden at the time.
The decision to start the school was made in 1826, but the education started 1827. 
Fursten 14:24, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction on origin

message: The Royal Institute of Technology (Swedish: Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, abbreviated KTH) is a university in Stockholm, Sweden. KTH was founded in 1827 as Sweden's first polytechnic and is with TKK in Helsinki, depending on definition, Scandinavia's largest institution of higher education in technology and one of the leading technical universities in Europe [2].
NTNU in trondheim, norway, is 20 000 students. This becomes vague however you put it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.141.133.17 (talk) 08:10, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  largest by what definition? 

message: The logotype that has been displayed here is incorrect so I removed it. The official logo is white on a blue box. CygnusA 21:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logotype 

message: In 2016 the university was ranked 97th in the world as a general university (not only technical) beaten in Sweden only by Lund University in its capacity as a general university by QS World University Rankings.[19] In 2016, KTH Royal Institute of Technology was ranked 33rd in engineering and technology, and 74th in the natural sciences worldwide.[19] The Electrical Engineering subject was ranked as number 26 worldwide in terms of highest quality in the world. KTH Royal Institute of Technology is the highest ranked institute of technology in northern mainland Europe, only rivaled by Germany's and Netherlands' highest ranking institutes of technology.[19] As a comparison, Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg ranks at 133 by QS World University Rankings.[20] The other global ranking, Times Higher Education World University Rankings ranks KTH 159th in the world for 2016–17.[21] As a comparison, Times for instance ranks the Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg at 251–300.[22]
this section needs heavy editing.  reads like a student trying to show off to his peers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.149.188.51 (talk) 21:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Vengeance on Varos

message: During the hiatus of 1985-86, Doctor Who Magazine reported that, as part of a fund-raiser for charity and to raise public support for bringing back the series, a videotape of raw studio footage from the making of this serial was to be either auctioned off or given away as part of a raffle. Unfortunately I lost all my 1980s-vintage DWMs years ago. If anyone out there has any of the 1985-86 issues, I think this would make an interesting piece of information to add to the article. I wonder who eventually won the tape? 68.146.41.232 (talk) 20:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The auctioning of raw footage