Talk:Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay

message: The MTV source cited doesn't seem to support the change in this article's title from Untitled Harold & Kumar Sequel to Harold & Kumar End Up in Gitmo.  Should the title change be reverted?  Is there another source that is more explicit about how the movie will ultimately be titled? — Hiplibrarianship 05:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Writer/director Hayden Schlossberg occasionally posts to the IMDb discussion board under the screename hpschlos: in a 7 June message he denied the "Gitmo" title, and provided the "High Alert" title on 13 June.  — Hiplibrarianship 05:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "... End up in Gitmo" title 

message: The release date is Feburary 8, both the refrences there say it is so don't change it back to april 4!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.145.225 (talk) 19:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Various sources now confirm the 25 April release date, including IMDb postings from directors Hurwitz and Schlossberg. — Hiplibrarianship (talk) 04:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date

message: This article was full last time I saw it, now it has nothing???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.145.225 (talk) 17:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What Happened?

message: As much as I loved the first movie (and i'm sure this one will be fucking incredible), it seems like there are only positive reviews. Maybe there aren't many negative reviews, and the critics certainly seem to like it, but there has to be one. Also, the format of the reviews' placement in this article isn't very formal. Could we rewrite it in some way? --George The Man (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the UGO and CinemaBlend blurbs to make it so the reception section doesn't give undue weight to the positive reviews. Some negative reviews could be added to reflect that the film got mixed reviews overall. --Pixelface (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias?

message: I don't know about you guys, but shouldn't the plot be removed? I mean, we don't even have a source for it. Ruthless Xero (talk) 04:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the 'Plot' be removed? 

message: Where's a source for that budget? This movie looks even bigger than the first and the first movie's budget was $9M. I'd estimate more like six-teen million dollars.ChesterG (talk) 03:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  budget 

message: Can any source confirm that their given names are "Manny" and "Chevitz"? I believe it is a mere referential joke about their Jewish ancestry (Manischewitz being an iconic Jewish wine). --~Magnolia Fen (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosenberg and Goldstein. 

message: I have only read that they plan on making it, if they can get the funds to do so. Nowhere have I read that it's been greenlighted, and currently in production. 
 
They confirmed it on Comic Con and G4's The Feed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.138.232 (talk) 01:30, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you provide a link to the place where they confirmed it? Artichoker[talk] 03:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel 

message: When does the song play in the movie? I'm not arguing it or anything just curious. Is it at the KKK bonfire? Disturbedfan24 (talk) 02:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whiplash 

message: I couldn't help but notice that a lot of the plot details are missing... like that cock sandwhich.... 
Elbutler (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The cockmeat sandwich does not influence the plot at all, and was simply a gag. Wikipedia doesn't need to mention every single detail that happened in a movie. Artichoker[talk] 21:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot details

message: Semi-protection? Wilkos (talk) 19:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Nah, just get the vandal blocked. DP76764 20:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  REQUEST 

message: Clearly not B class level, and due to the lack of coverage of the production phase it's not really 'C' class either. There is no coverage of the development phase including the casting, or the filming or the post-production. A 'C' class article should serve as a sufficient article in its own right, and while it allows for gaps in the coverage it shouldn't be misisng entire sections, so I'm demoting it to "Start" class. If you add a "production" section and want the article reassessed unstrike your request. Betty Logan (talk) 05:56, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Production

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66W4SoWYL?url=http://haroldandkumar.warnerbros.com/site.html to http://www.haroldandkumar.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080518011540/http://chicago.metromix.com/movies/movie_review/movie-review-harold-and/388164/content to http://chicago.metromix.com/movies/movie_review/movie-review-harold-and/388164/content
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified