lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Judaism and environmentalism

message: Article name was chosen to fit summary style of Religion and ecology and to ensure a coherent, broad scope. Jewish environmentalism is also notable, I set this up as a redirect, it is more narrow and does not fit those scholars/teachings that would not self-identify as environmentalist. Also, the title allows discussion of basic principles and teachings on nature, the human relationship to nature, etc. The proceedings of the major Harvard conference, which covers a strong full scope, is entitled Judaism and Ecology (Tirosh-Samuelson, 2002, HUP). 
It'd suggest setting up the structure by subtopics, as started already, rather than by denominations. Thanks. HG | Talk 20:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope and name 

message: I would like to improve this article, which seems to me like an introduction. I collected material on this subject for 25 years, and the subject is much wider than as presented now. Another proposition is to change the title of the article to "judaism and ecology" or "judaism and environment protection". 
--Saba50 (talk) 20:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modification proposed 
Talk:Ilchester School

message: Having looked at this (and other Somerset primary school articles) I just can't see how it is notable enough to sustain its own article. There is new consensus that supports bold deletion (after merging content into the appropriate community article) so that is what I have done. --Simple Bob a.k.a. The Spaminator (Talk) 09:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Stranded (video game)

message: There is a second game called Stranded since May 2014, sold by CurveDigital. --Lightkey (talk) 03:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the only video game with that name
Talk:Concrete and Clay

message: notes in parentheses are silent, + = the upbeat (the "and" of the beat)
Bossa nova (3-2): 1 (2)+ (3) 4  |  (1) 2 (3)+ (4)
Bossa nova (2-3): (1) 2 (3)+ (4) | 1 (2)+ (3) 4 
Baion: 1 (2)+ (3) 4
Baion is similar to the first bar of a 3:2 bossa, but is a one-bar phrase, like the song in question.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.212.71 (talk) 14:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

message: Is it "The sidewalks [i.e. plural] in the street", or "The sidewalk's in the street", i.e. the sidewalk has moved to the middle of the road, an unlikely event like the mountains crumbling etc?  Must admit I've always heard it as the latter, but I could be wrong. MFlet1 (talk) 07:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I always heard it as "the sidewalks and the street" which seems to me to be more congruent with the next line, "the concrete and the clay beneath my feet."  Every place I look, though, it says "the sidewalks IN the street."  I like my way better. :-)  Edit: I was mistaken, some places do have my version of the lyrics.  72.182.33.219 (talk) 07:56, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

text: I'd like to add that the acoustic guitar solo in the middle of the song is great until the guitar player totally blows it when the "sidewalks in/and the street" chorus starts again.  I have always been amused by this. 72.182.33.219 (talk) 08:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible mondegreen
Talk:Glossary of sheep husbandry

message: Flushing is improving of feed quality in the few weeks prior to mating to increase conception rates. Antibiotics are not used in the large scale production of sheep!Cgoodwin (talk) 05:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flushing

message: I am translating something into English and there is a term for 'three year old male sheep'. I want to know if there is an English word with this definition. Most of the special terms on the page seem to be interested in female sheep and in the first 18 months. Tibetologist (talk) 00:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is your sheep castrated or not?  In the English usage I've come across, an animal of that age would be regarded as fully adult, and the choice would be between ram (or in some areas tup) for an entire male, wether for a castrated one – or stag for a ram castrated late.  I wonder if "three years old" might really mean "over two years old"?.  There are English terms for younger sheep, such as teg or shearling ‐ these can be used as qualifiers, giving for example ram teg or wether teg.  --Richard New Forest (talk) 08:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More Sheep Terms?
Talk:Visual Instruction Set

message: Poking around a little on the net, it seems like VIS is supported in at least SPARC64 VI (but maybe not earlier revs?).  Can a subject expert weigh in here?--NapoliRoma 21:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found mention of VIS 1 in SPARC64 V documentation.--NapoliRoma 22:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  VIS support in SPARC64? 

message: Some of the comparison in the "Differences vs x86" section are nonsense.
For example:
 As with the SIMD instruction set extensions on other RISC processors, VIS strictly conforms to the main principle of RISC: keep the instruction set concise and efficient.
x86 SSE vector extensions are VERY efficient and are VERY concise. They implement very general forms that suit a wide range of applications. --64.121.146.209 (talk) 13:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences vs x86 nonsense
Talk:Sterol O-acyltransferase

message: Sources written by Surhone, Timpledon, Marseken need to be double checked (and possibly deleted) as per VDM Publishing § Wikipedia content duplication. Ihaveacatonmydesk Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 21:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surhone, Timpledon, Marseken 

message: There is a potential confusion between SOAT1 (ACAT1) and ACAT1 apers0n (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  SOAT / ACAT 

message: Same enzyme, 2 wikipedia pages : 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOAT1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.85.5.31 (talk) 18:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy of article
Talk:Jerome War Relocation Center

message: To whom it may or may not concern:
The Wiki icon for this article is located in the gulf of mexico approximatedly 300 miles South of the state of Arkansas; where the article states that the Jerome War Relocation Center is actually located.  For lack of means of moving the icon, it was left in the same place where it was discovered. 70.197.60.242 (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I recently edited the section on the 442nd and the loyalty questionnaire, and I've removed this statistic
: "The final report of registration at Jerome stated that out of the 5,802 that were eligible 5,798 registered."
not because I feel it's irrelevant, but because I can't tell whether the previous editor means draft registration or is using the WRA's evacuee registration euphemism to reference the loyalty questionnaire. If the first case, it seems like this number is waaay off and should remain out, as Jerome and Rohwer tied for the lowest rate of volunteer enlistment of all the camps. If the second, that should be made clearer (and explained — did the 4 who didn't "register" refuse to respond? the loyalty questionnaire was not optional...)MartinaDee (talk) 00:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Registration" statistic 
Talk:The Purple Gang

message: Arrangement is spelled wrong in the last sentence of the first paragraph.  Please correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.123.61.62 (talk) 21:52, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrangement Spelled Wrong 

message: Does it seem spammy to anyone else to have the image at the top of the page that of a book? Seems like there ought to be a better image to use that would be more neutral. Unforgiven24 (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it seem spammy to anyone else... 

message: The link in reference 1 has nothing to do with the Purple Gang. It's all about a man named Booth and a place called Cranbrook; not one mention of the Purple Gang or the Bernstein brothers. Someone needs to find a proper link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.194.36.163 (talk) 13:29, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference 1; Michigan History 

message: Who took all of the information out of this entry?  And why?  It no longer has any history of the Purples, lists no names and incidents, and links to almost nothing else.  The Detroit News story linked as reference 1 has far more information than this now-useless article. 72.227.138.15 (talk) 18:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Happened to This Article? 

message: The Eminem song listed does not refer to 'Purple Gang' as the mobsters. It refers to Purple Gang the rap group from Detroit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Higgers10 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture - Eminem Song 

message: *An editor on Citizendium has plagiarized this Purple Gang article for their project, without attribution. ChicagoHistory1930 (talk) 10:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citizendium 

message: A contributor at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Rosman has suggested a merge to this article. Please contribute to the AfD if you have an opinion on this. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related AfD
Talk:Feeneyism

message: The article states that the Still River community considers the Richmond SBC a "cult".   However, the citation (the article on SPLC's web site) attributes that word to Paul Melanson.  Is there any reason not to correct this? --Chonak (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misattributed assertion 

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:43, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't need a descriptor because that entire section violates WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE. POV pushers tend to forgot that when someone goes to an article on say, Feeneyism, they want to find out about Feeneyism, not the opinions of a particular biased organization in the USA. 85.71.136.103 (talk) 08:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Be that as it may, the SPLC isn't the only organization that condemns these supposedly "Catholic" organizations leftover from Leonard Feeney's movement. So does the Church. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 01:00, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 

message: I agree that this article should be merged, but I don't think it should be merged into Feeneyism, which is an article centered more on the theological position than on the group. Rather, I think this article should be merged into The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary page, since that page deals directly with the group and its divisions.  Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 01:48, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion from [[Immaculate Heart of Mary School (Massachusetts)]]
Talk:Weakest liberal precondition

message: I'm not sure this article is accurate. Weakest liberal preconditions are just a re-expression of Floyd Hoare Logic in the calculus of predicate transformers, and they're accounted for in publications that pre-date the cite given here. Also, Dijkstra invented "wp" specifically to overcome the "partial correctness" problem with "wlp". Therefore saying "an extension" is probably wrong. Maybe this should move to be part of the Predicate transformer semantics page?
: I agree: it belongs there. Maybe I'll do it sometime, not now. PJTraill (talk) 17:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (but without addressing the above objections) PJTraill (talk) 18:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Tele-epidemiology

message: Article in progress, with multiple users input JPDMichel 21:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

message: A tag has been placed on :Tele-epidemiology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. 
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material.  To do this, affix the template  to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JPDMichel 21:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{{header-text|[[:Tele-epidemiology]]}}}
Talk:Peterhead

message: Is the usage of fitlyk confined to Peterhead, or is it a more general north-east thing? - Dudesleeper /  Talk 01:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fit like? - look up Doric dialect.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fitlyk 

message: According to the quoted sources the population was 17,947 at the 2001 Census and 17,560 by the General Register Office 2004 estimate.  Please don't change these figures unless you also provide references for more up-to-date estimates.  Thanks!  --Deskford (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The General Register Office 2006 estimate is 17,330.  This is the most up-to-date figure I can find.  --Deskford (talk) 11:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: If you go there, the most striking thing visually is the enormous harbour breakwater. I understand this was built by prisoners. Anyone have more information they can add to the article? Kognos (talk) 20:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harbour 

message: But this is not mentioned.  Maybe a separate fishing section?  It must be incredibly important to the town.  
https://www.bbc.com/news/46401558 Boscaswell talk 23:39, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @Boscaswell Done now. - Seasider53 (talk) 13:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The biggest UK fishing port by far
Talk:Bylot Island

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* [TYPE HERE]
HULLO
--86.153.6.49 (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:St. Andrew's School (Rhode Island)

message: Currently, the main text appears to have been lifted bodily from the school's website.  Are there no others who have gone to this school besides me who might revise this? I'm at work or I'd think about it more now. - Denimadept (talk) 21:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dang, now I'm stuck thinking about it! - Denimadept (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol, I know what that feels like :) good work! Waldir talk 12:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is, how to rewrite it while using stuff we can cite?  I mean, how much has been published about this school?  OTOH, how many people have gone here and could write anecdotes to write rather a long article? - Denimadept (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I could speak of how it used to be necessary to get girls from Barrington High School, but I don't think that'd be of interest. - Denimadept (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: loool well you could add a picture, that would be great for a start :) Waldir talk 02:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A picture of girls at Bill's House? Could maybe find that. I've a number of pictures. I should find them.  - Denimadept (talk) 02:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: =P Waldir talk 12:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No?  How about what I understand is now very strange: a picture of guys in Cady? - Denimadept (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Hadn't heard of it, but I'll look. - Denimadept (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Okay, I've now looked.  Thanks for the thought, I think, but I'll pass.  Let's try something else instead:  Back in my day at St. Andrews school, the only action we could get was across the street!  And I never crossed the street, having an appreciation of porn.  Back in my day, if you didn't like someone, you knocked a hole in their wall and threw liquified ... nevermind, not gonna tell that story.  - Denimadept (talk) 18:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite needed 

message: As this has been tagged since 2008, I've removed the following relatively major unsourced claims whilst leaving in a bulk of the history, and put them here in case anyone has the time or inclination to improve the article.
* Over 95% of graduates attend college.
* The story goes that St. Andrew’s began when Father Chapin found a homeless boy begging at the Providence train station. Without hesitation, he took the boy in and founded a school.
*  In 2002, St. Andrew’s was named an “Exemplary School” (one of only eight in the country) by the national Schools Attuned program for “an exemplary commitment to understanding differences in learning and helping struggling students achieve success in the classroom and in life.”
:Thanks.  The removed prose is still in the history.  I really wish someone would come along and find appropriate cites for this article.  I didn't manage it. - Denimadept (talk) 01:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content
Talk:StoryCorps

message: This article is totally non-neutral and reads like an advertisement, probably since parts of it are copied directly from the StoryCorps website without citing any sources. It needs major re-writing. --n-k, 17:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: In the second graf, last line: instead of 60,000 interviews among more than 100,000 participants; StoryCorps now has over 316,000 interviews among more than 550,000 participants  https://storycorps.org/about/  Kwjus (talk) 17:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 

message: The first para says 2003, but the info box on the right says 2002.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelhurwicz (talk • contribs) 17:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded in 2003 or 2002?
Talk:Twangin...

message: Rolling Stone nicked Dave for doing mostly covers as this entry does, but I think it's a trivial factoid. Why I it more relevant in Dave's case than in the cases of Sinatra and Billie Holiday, who feasted for decades on covers. Unless the artist is a noted songwriter doing an album of covers, I don't see why it has any relevance. (An example of that is Harry Nilsson's album of Randy Newman songs.) Nicmart (talk) 03:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover songs
Talk:Medical Devices Directive

message: I propose this page be re-titled Medical Devices Directive (all words capitalized) because the directive is frequently referred to as the MDD.  Titles from lower-cased constructs, and those with the singular Device should also re-direct here. Mark Beard (talk) 15:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So this directive has been repealed? That's at least what the second paragraph suggests, but other wording in the article (using the present tense) is not that clear. --JensMueller (talk) 05:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repealed?
Talk:Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning

message: University of Michigan is not represented with a project at :Category:WikiProject Universities. Please comment at Talk:University_of_Michigan#Should_University_of_Michigan_have_a_project.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  02:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Michigan Project
Talk:Vandenberg (band)

message: I've never heard or read any comparison to the Vinnie Vincent Invasion.  I'm listening to the first Vandenberg disc right now and it's nothing like Vinnie Vincent's (whom I have met) LA glam-metal.  A review I read of this disc in a 1982 Kerrang! compared it to Scorpions and Judas Priest.  I'd go more with '80s Scorpions.--MarshallStack 21:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison to Vinnie Vincent Invasion 
Talk:Normal extension

message: The article reads:
"The following conditions are equivalent to L / K being a normal extension:
* Let  be an algebraic closure of K containing L. Every embedding σ of L in Ka which restricts to the identity on K, satisfies σ(L) = L. In other words, σ is an automorphism of L over K.
* Every irreducible polynomial in K[X] which has a root in L factors into linear factors in L[X]."''
This might be saying that the conjunction of these two conditions is what's equivalent to L / K being a normal extension.  Then again it might be saying that each of the two conditions is equivalent to L / K being a normal extension.
It's important to avoid such ambiguity.Daqu 21:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Highly ambiguous wording

message: There are three candidates for the definition of normality of a field extension L/K:
# L is the splitting field of a family of polynomials in K[X]
# Let Ka be an algebraic closure of K containing L. Every embedding  σ of L in Ka which restricts to the identity on K, satisfies σ(L) = L
# Every irreducible polynomial in K[X] which has a root in L factors into linear factors in L[X]
These are equivalent for algebraic extensions but in many sources I've looked at (e.g. PlanetMath, MathReference, (Stewart 1989)) it is condition 3 that is usually given as the definition for normality, and the definition isn't restricted to algebraic extensions. This is somewhat important since the conditions don't agree for non-algebraic extensions. For example, consider the extension Q(t)/Q, where Q is the field of rational numbers and Q(t) is the field of rational functions in Q. Then no irreducible polynomial in Q[X] has a root in Q(t) and, for this reason, the extension Q(t)/Q trivially satisfies condition 3 but fails to satisy condition 1. It also trivially satisfies condition 2 since no algebraic closure of Q contains Q(t).
I suggest rewriting the article to have condition 3 as the proper definition and detailing the non-equivalence of the other conditions for non-algebraic extensions. I realise this is a bit pedantic since usually one only deals with algebraic extensions when talking about normality but I think it's still an important technical point. Ali 24789 (talk) 02:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct definition
Talk:Aydon Castle

message: Seems to be some inaccurate information here: the early history states Hugh de Raymes purchased the land in 1296, but a couple of sentences later claims he died in 1295. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:810F:1500:D0A0:EBF4:8E9C:29B7 (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note formerly unsigned now signed and two identical queries united under one header by DBaK (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, a bit of a mess, thank you  and . I checked the NHLE ref hereit says Hugh started the purchase then it ran into royal-approval complications, and he was dead before it completed, which is when his son stepped in. I've added this, with NHLE for a ref. Thanks again for pointing it out. Best to all, DBaK (talk) 08:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date discrepancy: could someone address an error?