lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jack Starsmore (comics)

message: The Jack Starsmore page is now up and running hope you find it helpful.
~Thanks~ 
Ryonslaught 00:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not big on knowing where to place your commas, huh? It's the same problem with all the pages you created. Gonna have to rework all that. Fetternity (talk) 08:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up and running
Talk:Saint-Michel, Montreal

message: "The 1990s saw Saint-Michel's reputation tarnished by its severe street gang problems and the negative propaganda surrounding the whole situation. In consequence, Saint-Michel was long viewed as one of Montreal's most dangerous inner city neighborhoods. Although these problems persist to this day, the phenomenon seems better controlled."
This needs clarification from sensationalism and some references please.
Mars2mogwai (talk) 23:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Reference 

message: As per WP:CANSTYLE#Neighbourhoods, this article should be moved to Saint-Michel, Montreal.  In accordance with the guideline, however, the move is first being raised on the talk page. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed page move

message: I think the page Saint-Michel-de-Laval should be merged into this article since Saint-Michel de Laval corresponds exactly to what is today the St-Michel neighborhood. All the infos and  categories on Saint-Michel-de-Laval can simply be added on this page. The Saint-Michel-de-Laval page does not offer anything that cannot be included in this article. 
Keep in mind that, except for the Old Montreal section, all neighbourhoods in Montreal were once idependent cities at one timeline or another. Having seperate articles for the former city of St-Michel-de-Laval and the Saint-Michel neighborhood is like having seperate articles for the Verdun borough and the former city of Verdun. It's pretty much pointless.  
Farine (talk) 02:26, 26 March 2008
*I think I agree, if we're talking about a situation where the borders of the borough and former city are exactly the same, i.e. not a situation like Roxboro, Quebec and Pierrefonds-Roxboro. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't really matter if the boundaries are not precisely the same.  Municipal boundaries do commonly evolve over the decades, given annexations and adjustments.  However, as long as the articles generally cover the same place, merging them is fine (the article can refer to any boundary adjustments).  Shawn's example is a good one -- because that's a different situation entirely, where Roxboro and Pierrefonds-Roxboro are completely different entities covering different areas.  Skeezix1000 (talk) 11:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a note that the title of the merged article should be consistent with WP:CANSTYLE#Neighbourhoods.  Skeezix1000 (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge article
Talk:Indian flying fox

message: I'm doing a school report on Indian Flying Fox, and I wanted to know if anyone had, advice for me, so that's what this discussion is mainly for. Sophia R. Snipes (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is pretty small. Might be that looking online for sources is a good idea. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian Flying Fox 
Talk:Okinawa flying fox

message: should the redirected article be merged into the current? 70.55.84.74 (talk) 04:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge? 
Talk:Big-eared flying fox

message: Exclude the parenthetical insertion, which can and does happen when read or parsed, and the first line reads:
* The big-eared flying fox is a species of bat in the family Pteropodidae, larger bats who subsist largely on fruits.
The premise "big-eared flying fox is a species of bat" is invalid, the 'consensus' at the english wikipedia that says otherwise has been rigorously applied in often semi-automated edits. That doesn't change what is obviously a licensed premise, that any common name is the species name. I find this very awkward to word correctly in a lead, an unnecessary handicap to discussing the concepts involved. Repeating what was certainly invented vernacular to supply another name for the current taxonomic concept goes against the grain for me, based on core policies strongly supported by consensus and defying the evident will to suppress the actual name when those few decided this was how it was going to be. cygnis insignis 10:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we just MOS:RETAIN here? I'm not following you around changing what you do to the lead formatting. I would prefer you didn't do that to articles I've built up, either. Enwebb (talk) 14:29, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is not good. I hadn't been looking at it from that perspective, and now it is clear you do I will be avoiding anything that suggests 'following you around' or messing with things you are invested in. Please accept my apology where I was unable to avoid giving that impression, it wont happen again, deep respect for your contributions will mean I avoid any overlap.  cygnis insignis 14:45, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  invalid statement
Talk:Wild Child (film)

message: Both Amazon.co.uk and Amazon.com (as an Import) and all other CD shops show this soundtrack (you can even see a track list) and it has 17 songs, and doesn't include "Chasing Pavements". I don't know if this tracklisting is some speciali Australian or iTunes version, but the real CD tracklist from the UK should be included and not a different version.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.238.73.65 (talk) 16:56, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack 

message: Wasn't that everlife's version of "real wild child" at the end? Altarep (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trailer 

message: This entire section is speculation and should probably be eliminated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopher451 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Editing" Section 

message: Put DreamWorks Pictures and Illumination Entertainment 148.252.132.57 (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What If Co–Production [[DreamWorks Pictures]] and [[Illumination (company)|Illumination Entertainment]]
Talk:Holohan murder case

message: This article is based on news accounts only and I did not have access to official DoD records or court files. My own opinion is that Icardi and LoDolce were falsely accused as part of Cold War intrigue and Italian politics. The accounts of the Italian witnesses against the Americans are somewhat improbable whereas the shell casings outside the villa and the hand grenade on the beach supports the idea that Holohan was killed outside in the firefight. Ediza8 01:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:English Missal

message: Opening sentence currently reads:
"The English Missal is a translation of the Roman Missal used by some liturgically advanced Anglo-Catholic parish churches."
It it not at all obvious what 'liturgically advanced' is intended to mean.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.175.219 (talk) 03:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'liturgically advanced'?
Talk:Jinshanling

message: "The Jinshanling section of the Great Wall is 10.5 km long[1] with 5 passes, 67 towers and 2 beacon towers. The initial section of the wall has been restored to original condition, but the condition of the wall deteriorates towards its natural state as it approaches Simatai."
This section seems to have been lifted verbatim from http://www.china.org.cn/english/travel/57234.htm.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsfadss (talk • contribs) 07:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted material?
Talk:Great flying fox

message: I would like to know more about this creature. I have this Biology project and I need more information, but everywhere I go (on the web) I can't find valid information on this endagered creature. It would be  great help if you Wikipedia people update these articles and add more information. Poeple always say " You can never have to much information". I say it's true. I know im not the only person that comes to Wiki every time we do research papers( you know! Look up info and start writing. I wouldn't copy the thesis statements. I look over to information,so I can add certain details to my paper.) Please update your infomation madam ou misier.
Yours truly,
A freshmen at a certain high school who's getting ready for STAAR.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.186.112 (talk) 03:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bismark Flying Fox? 

message: Might be able to expand with Andersen 1912 . Enwebb (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding to description section
Talk:Mutianyu

message: I have a question about this sentence in the article- Due to its proximity to the Jiankou Great Wall, the Mutianyu-Jiankou trail is becoming one of the most popular Great Wall hikes. As Jiankou is in a state of disrepair, this hike combines the preserved condition of Jiankou's Great Wall with the classic restorative brickwork of Mutianyu. The sentence mentions that Jiankou is in a state of disrepair and then calls it preserved event though that section has never been restored.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.69.185 (talk) 19:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the point was that the stones were from the Ming instead of newly reconstructed material from the last 50 years. _dk (talk) 19:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Essays and Reviews

message: The actual copy of Essays and Reviews on Internet Archive lists John W. Parker as publisher--not editor.  See: https://ia802604.us.archive.org/10/items/a578549600unknuoft/a578549600unknuoft.pdf Mwidunn (talk) 21:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Book does not agree

message: We seem to have further reading rather than references. Several points, particularly those related to Darwin, were taken from Desmond & Moore's Darwin, and there are some other details in Janet Browne's Charles Darwin: vol. 2 The Power of Place. Want these added as references, and want harvard referencing in a notes section to give page numbers? ... dave souza, talk 12:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. I was just trying to build up potential references by putting them in the 'Further reading' section for now. But, yes, please add - as Harvard ref - the references (page numbers) from Desmond & Moore, and Janet Brown. Thanks! Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 12:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darwin 

message: While I am not going to be MUCH help this month, I did see that a few of the resources available on Essays and Reviews breakout the various Articles, and mention which of the authors wrote each article; that information may be helpful for a scholarly analysis, though I'm not sure how much further anyone can go (in Wikipedia) with describing the articles beyond a simple table, as it would then potentially move into Original Research to summarize them. Bill Ward (talk) 20:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt 'original research' will be a problem as there is a lot of printed commentary and scholary analysis ... even per essay. It might be more library research than internet though. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 23:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The introduction to Shea and Whitla's edition has more information than we need, for an encyclopedia article; I'll try to add some of it next week.  Mgriffin (talk) 03:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Titles and Authors? 

message: This has some details that I will pump in here before month's end. -- Secisek (talk) 02:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'll get back to it again also. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Oxford Dictionary of Christianity
Talk:Poudre B

message: Harmsworth's Universal Encyclopaedia vol X (1922) p6301 'Poudre B' says it is named for General Boulanger. All Poudre B variations are mainly a mixture of two types of nitrocotton (12 and 13% nitrogen, slightly, and completely soluble in ether alcohol). The Poudre BN version contained barium and potassium nitrates. - Rod57 (talk) 01:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict with 1922 encyclopedia
Talk:Samoa flying fox

message: Can an experienced editor please help me with adding a photo. I have an image I uploaded on Wiki Commons. I would like to use that photo for the section I edited in this article, but I do not know how to. Here is the embedded info: <a title="It's on an American coin, released by the U.S. mint. / Public domain" href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New-quarter-ht-er-200109_hpMain_16x9_992.jpg"><img width="512" alt="New-quarter-ht-er-200109 hpMain 16x9 992" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/89/New-quarter-ht-er-200109_hpMain_16x9_992.jpg/512px-New-quarter-ht-er-200109_hpMain_16x9_992.jpg"></a>
Battykin (talk) 19:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I've adjusted the caption! Enwebb (talk) 02:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Thank you so much! Would you be kind enough to do the same on this page -- National Park of American Samoa Battykin (talk) 04:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need an experienced editor please. Help with Samoan Fruit Bat coin
Talk:Vanikoro flying fox

message: Each statement of fact in each section of the account should be footnoted with the corresponding reference, please. Also the conservation section should be updated to reveal that the species was sighted in large numbers in 2014 (move that info from the top). DrBuchholz (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Coments

message: This post looks like it is coming along well. I have a few suggestions for you:
1. If possible, you should try to add in a picture so that readers have a visual to go along with the description of the animal. 
2. In your description, review the first sentence. It has a few grammatical errors that should be corrected for clarity. Size is only described relative to another species with no physical data given for either one. It would be helpful to include this data and add more physical descriptions.
3. In the behavior section, you could mention some information about this organism's mating behaviors and add in some more content. 
Hope these suggestions help!
Bfiorenzo (talk) 04:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Large flying fox

message: This article is titled "Large Flying Fox", there´s also an article titled "Small Flying-fox"... What is the convention on naming? MH (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section is very poorly written...actually, it looks like random letters and words were dropped. An expert on the subject should review and fix it. Dziban303 (talk) 02:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Behavior and life history

message: The number of teeth and the dental formula don't correlate. 
--Snorkelman 17:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: the flying fox is the biggest Bat in the world. the flying fox eats mango applys and frowt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.217.106.76 (talk) 01:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  flying fox 

message: Found at BHL. Might be a nice addition for a GA push at some point. Enwebb (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool plate of this species
Talk:Mount Heng (Shanxi)

message: This article sounds strongly like advertising to me. Aren't questions like "Why build a monastery like this?" inappropriate for an encyclopedia?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.67.214.14 (talk) 19:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. It's more promotional than informative, and should be rewritten. - Jmabel | Talk 22:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  advertising? 

message: "At 2,017 m, it is one of the five tallest peaks in China Proper." Since there are many points in Sichuan that are above 15,000 feet, and Sichuan is considered to be in China Proper, this statement seems to be untrue and I have removed it. 
-2001:558:6027:53:99B8:F1EA:7B8B:FD1B (talk) 03:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracy
Talk:Ship of Memories

message: Surely this is a studio album - albeit compiled from archive material? Doesn't a compilation imply that material has been released before? Best Witchwooder (talk) 09:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compilation album? 

message: Editors at Wikipedia removes «Ship of Memories» from the discography over and over again. Why? Ship of Memories’’, Golden Oldies & Focus Family Album is a compilation STUDIO album. Compilation albums is "greatest hits", like "Hocus Pocus" (1994) & "Best of Vol. 2" (2011). No greatest hits compilations, but compilation studio albums is OK.
Do not remove "Ship of Memories from the discography section on this page page. Thank you. 
--NRKfan (talk) 18:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship of Memories / The Focus Family Album / Golden Oldies - Studio albums
Talk:John D. Lavelle

message: It appears that fairly lengthy passages here are direct quotations from the article by the Casey's. While most or all of these cite the article, I'm not sure it is kosher to simply quote entire paragraphs without indicating they are quotations. I haven't checked other cited sources for possible copyright issues. Not fully knowing the rules, I'm not making changes right now - also, the material is indeed well worked into the article and it would be difficult to address without compromising a fairly informative article.  Anyone know the best way to handle this? --CAVincent (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted Material? 
Talk:Wuzhi Mountain

message: anybody knows if on the top of Wuzhi Shan snow has ever fallen ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.9.139.35 (talk) 09:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Snow

message: * speedy support. TrueColour (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I'm not entirely clear why it is now Wuzhi Shan. As this is English Wikipedia, it would be Wuzhi Mountain. But no big deal. As long as it's not Mount Wuzhi. (I'm not trying to re-open the discussion, but if anybody wants to make the change, that's fine with me.) --Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:43, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is only a revert of the latest moves "to make TrueColour and Anna happy". Well, I am happy if it is Wuzhi Mountain. We just have to wait until an admin moves the page there, no need to re-open discussion. I hope that all articles on places in China profit from the recent adjustments to WP:NC-ZH. TrueColour (talk) 16:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It actually should be Wuzhi Mountain 
Talk:Mediterranean horseshoe bat

message: — Assignment last updated by ProcyonEnthusiast (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BSC 4052 Conservation Biology
Talk:Queensland Labor Party (1957–1978)

message: Does the information on this page really justify an article seperate from the Australian Labor Party or Democratic Labor Party (historical)? Timeshift 01:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so. It was an independent party for a while, and predated the creation of the DLP. I'd see the relationship as being like the Australia Party to the Australian Democrats, both of which we have seperate articles on. I also think, as a general principle, merging seperate (but related) parties into one article is a bad idea. It tends to lead to the sort of confusion we have with early state parties, where we've say, got all of the post-1917 split members marked as members of the Nationalist Party of Australia, when they were actually members of unaffiliated (and different in a number of ways) state parties with similar names.  Rebecca 02:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance?

message: Should it be included in the article that despite the existence of the QLP the Queensland ALP is still mistakenly referred to as the Queensland Labor Party. 
I have heard some commentators even managing to avoid referring to the Queensland ALP as Queensland Labor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Shadow Treasurer (talk • contribs) 05:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queensland ALP 

message: The article says the QLP was absorbed into the DLP in 1962, but then goes on to discuss the QLP's electoral success in 1963 and 1966. Can anyone clarify if/when/how the QLP was absorbed into the DLP? Kerry (talk) 09:31, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In 1962 it effectively became the state affiliate of the DLP. A similar case are the Greens Western Australia who didn't affiliate with the federal party until about 2003 but before then had performed much the same role in their state. Timrollpickering 13:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  absorbed into the DLP 

message: I haven't time to correct the main article just yet but it is incorrect to say that the QLP directed preferences to the Coalition in 1957 and 1960. Queensland used the first past the post voting system in 1957, and the split Labor vote between the ALP and the QLP enabled the Country Party and the Liberal Party to win normally Labor seats. In 1960 the Country-Labor government retained first past the post voting, as the QLP was a different party then from the DLP and they feared a rapprochement between the two competing Labor parties. At the election of 1963 preferential voting was introduced by the Coalition, as they then realised the differences between the two Labor parties were irreconcilable, and the fact that the QLP was then the DLP meant it would do what was done in all other states and direct preferences away from the ALP towards the Coalition.124.180.243.90 (talk) 11:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preference Distribution
Talk:Blyth's horseshoe bat

message: I found this lunk regarding the foraging behavior of this bat. How useful would this be?
/https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/mamm/83/1/article-p78.xml
TheLordOfWikis (talk) 07:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found link regarding foraging behavior
Talk:João Grande

message: Titles should not be included in article names per  Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Honorific prefixes --Nate1481( t/c) 07:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: João Grande is a nickname, not a title, and per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Pseudonyms.2C_stage_names_and_common_names, it seems appropriate as it is his public name (if this is an old comment re. the word Mastre in his name, it's been moved). His real name should be mentioned, but I can't seem to find a reference to it anywhere. Anyone... Focomoso (talk) 07:20, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  found it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Focomoso (talk • contribs) 08:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Removed comment
The original material for this page is largely taken from material available at http://www.joaogrande.org/. This copy will probably be replaced with one that is purely for wikipedia in the near future, once the preferences of the copyright holder are known (he's traveling right now). Since this was not written as a Wikipedia article, the style remains truer to the original than to Wikipedia style standards.
removed form article --Nate1481( t/c) 08:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copy right issue?
Talk:João Pereira dos Santos

message: Hey..........How do you pronounce "Pequeno" in Portuguese???  Or Brazil style?  Anybody know?  Please post on my page User: j.l.barthel
thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by J.l.barthel (talk • contribs) 21:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Psalm 67

message: It is proposed on Talk:Psalms to drop the text of psalms from the individual psalm articles.  If you wish to weigh in, please do so there. Tb (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For a short psalm such as this, presenting the text in Hebrew and English is convenient to readers, vs. forcing them to click back and forth to some other text source. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Drop text