lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neshaminy High School

message: Hi! I saw this edit which stated that the school is in Langhorne, Pennsylvania. While the mailing address says "Langhorne, PA", the school is not physically in Langhorne. It's actually in Middletown Township. Therefore having the article saying the school is in Langhorne would be misleading.
addressing why mailing addresses of Kingwood, Texas would remain "Kingwood" even after the City of Houston annexed Kingwood, the city stated:
* " The U.S. Postal Service establishes ZIP codes and mailing addresses in order to maximize the efficiency of their system, not to recognize jurisdictional boundaries." - And it goes on to state instances where a place may be in one city but have a post address saying a different city.
Since it's been established that US postal address "city names" are sometimes misleading, the way to determine where a place really is is to compare the physical location to a map of the township. This is the map of Middletown Township, Bucks County on the US Census Bureau. The PDF document's page 4 matches with the physical location.
The general public has misconceptions of where places really are in the US, and these articles should say where places are located. I know that many members of the public are confused by this, so I hope this explains why I restored the location as Middletown Township.
Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW I found a notice in a newspaper from 1954 which identifies the school as being in Middletown Township (the mailing address is later stated as "Langhorne Pa."), Additionally the 2022 budget of Middletown Township states "Neshaminy High School, located in Middletown Township,[...]" (document page 239, PDF p. 239/258). I made the budget sentence citation the first line of the reference. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, to the best of my recollection, I made that change in the location based on the mailing address, but the other location data is more compelling. Meleager91 (talk) 21:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Elsie Allen High School

message: The "critically acclaimed" person who was in a commercial, that's not going anywhere. But Jesse Nee-Vogelman, there might be something there--there is some coverage, which also pertains to the school, here, though in my opinion not enough to warrant a separate article. Drmies (talk) 03:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni
Talk:The Whitworth

message: Should this be at The Whitworth? Seems to be the name now, and is the only name used in the lead - though "The" is not capitalised on its own website in running text. PamD 17:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title: The Whitworth?
Talk:Schild equation

message: Eons ago I uploaded an image and forgot the copyright (Why is the GNU not default!) I think it was this, but I have many so not usre if to swarm the page. --Squidonius (talk) 11:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

message: For a  start, the title is inappropriate. It should be "The Schild Equation".Calling it the Schild regression implies a particular method of estimation of the parameters given some data. The classical Schild plot isn't the best way to do this.
Furthermore the derivation given, though similar to that given by Schild, disguises the fact that the Schild equation has been shown to have far wider validity than Schild realised. 
Also it is wrong to say that the first radioligand binding experiment was done by Lefkowitz et al (1970).
This reference should be to Paton and Rang (1966) 
David Colquhoun (talk) 20:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs revision and expansion. 

message: The terms 'equilibrium', 'kinetics' and 'steady state'are used in non-standard ways that are not consistent with their meanings in physical chemistry.
David Colquhoun (talk) 20:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: More problems with this page
Talk:Dead Island

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Sufficient proof (links, statistics, and so on) that the series has become the primary topic over the game should be gathered before re-requesting this set of moves. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 April 2023
Talk:Clowns (video game)

message: Strategy- The amazing jumping clowns...You control the seesaw. Use your skill to glide it under the clown in the air so that he can bounce his partner to the top of the center ring. Each clown floats into the air grabbing wildly at the colorful balloons overhead. Pop as many balloons as you can for extra bonus points. Clowns Scoring- 1) You can plays CLOWNS with 1 or 2 people. 2) CLOWNS is played with the game paddles. 3) To start the game, hit the F1 key for one player and the F3 key for 2 players. Yellow Balloon-20 Points Cyan(Light Blue) Balloon-50 Points Dark Blue Balloon-100 Points Clear all Green Balloons-200 Bonus Points Clear all Cyan Balloons-500 Bonus Points Clear all Dark Blue Balloons-1000 Bonus Points 10,000 Points-1 Bonus Jumper Libro0 19:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Instructions
Talk:Wet (video game)

message: While I read an IGN article on Activision/Blizzard's decision to no longer be the publisher for this game, the company that makes the game Sierra, hasn't said anything at all about it on either their main page or the game's main page.  While I'm not saying I question the info presented in this article, we at least need some citations to verify it.  I would put that template up but I'm not entirely sure how to do it and I'm at work so I can't really spend the time to do it myself. Sorry.  - (KeeperOTD (talk) 14:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Шушпанов (talk • contribs) 00:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Game Cover
Talk:Aggravated felony

message: This article has developed significant issues with  citation overkill and references that, themselves, contain strings of sources in a bullet point format. Much of the bullet point content in the references appears to constitute original research with a very heavy dependence upon case law (a primary source).
The net effect of the bullet pointed references is to render the reference section very difficult to parse and I suspect has the overall effect of obscuring the sourcing for the article rather than directing users to reliable sources cited in support of the article's content. There is also content within the references that appears to be better placed in footnotes. Arllaw (talk) 15:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with references
Talk:R-39 Rif

message: Tom Clancy's The Hunt for Red October repeatedly mentions this missile by its NATO reporting name (sorta) but persists in referring to it as a "Seahawk." Example quote: "The Red October carried twenty-six SS-N-20 Seahawk missiles, each with eight 500-kiloton multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles—MIRVs—enough to destroy two hundred cities." (p. 12) This might be an interesting addition to the article (assuming that it is sufficiently notable) although it would be worth it to seek expert testimony or, better yet, some reliable sources (a book review, perhaps? one written by a naval officer?) that deals with this subject and especially the missile's name (artistic license or just a Clancy goof?). Throwing it out there, might come back to this later. RexSueciae (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  mention in ''The Hunt for Red October''
Talk:Brookmeade Stable

message: A bit of a stub, I know.  This is my first new article, so please go easy on me.  Someone who has access to an actual copy of the book "Legacies of the Turf" could probably help a lot.  My library doesn't have it, so I was going off of the Google Books version, which badly need to be rescanned. Aaronstj 20:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Holmes Herbert

message: According to Brian Taves 2012 book on Thomas Ince, Holmes Herbert married Ince's widow Elinor in 1926, seemingly his first marriage. He is notated as having moved in with his two daughters into Elinor's house. He married Beryl Mercer after this marriage when Mercer was well over 50 years old, so I doubt she produced any children in the early 1930s during a busy time in her career and certainly past child bearing age. After divorcing Mercer, Holmes Herbert was married to Joan Agnes Bartholomew who died in 1955. So it is not clear where Herbert's two daughters came from or what relationship. Taves makes it clear he had more than one child by the time he married Elinor Ince in 1926.Koplimek (talk) 17:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Family
Talk:Brian Boydell

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This is a Start-class article -- it is lacking a number of things I'd expect in a typical composer biography, some of which could probably be supplied by the biography that is listed as a "Further reference", but was not obviously used in preparing this article. My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 14:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Mark 7 nuclear bomb

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Manchester Metropolitan University Business School

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Manchester Metropolitan University Business School
The Business School moved to a new building, at a new location this year. 
The co-ordinates of our new location are as follows:- 53° 28' 13" N, 2° 14' 23" W
The post code for our new location is  M15 6BH
If you have any queries about this change please contact Mark Fernandes (m.fernandes@mmu.ac.uk)
—Markfernandes (talk) 08:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . Deor (talk) 10:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:1978 Manchester Moss Side by-election

message: Is there any reason why this article ought not to be merged with the Manchester Moss Side (UK Parliament constituency) article? --Malleus Fatuarum 00:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, thanks. I hadn't noticed that there was a set of articles on by-elections. I'll withdraw the merger proposal. --Malleus Fatuarum 18:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Category talk:Video game articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction

message: I have recently seen a large debate over the relevance of pages due to their lack of "fact" based views (I haven't logged in for a while.... Please excuse the tardyness)(i.e.Guldan) My question to admin AND editors is this: "How can a "fact" based view be presented on a character based only on fiction?"Subzerohero111 20:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts 

message: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Infobox_backlog czar 22:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retiring this category
Talk:United States Assistant Secretary of Defense

message: This is not properly a disambiguation page. If it were, we would have to delete all the red links, shorten the lede to say "United States Assistant Secretary of Defense may refer to:", and delete everything else on the page, including the external link, these being expressly forbidden on disambig pages. bd2412 T 16:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing is, that doesn't fix the problem. Many pages link to this page, presumably when they really mean the specific office. For example, the Thomas F. Hall article says that he was "Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs". I'm fixing that now, of course, but there will be many others, no doubt. StAnselm (talk) 19:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manchester Gorton (UK Parliament constituency)

message: In the Manchester_Central_(UK_Parliament_constituency) page it states "The electoral wards used in the modified Central seat are: Moston, Ancoats and Clayton, Ardwick, Bradford, City Centre, Hulme, Moss Side, Miles Platting and Newton Heath and Whalley Range", contradicting the wards given on this page, referenced to a 2007 document.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by No essential nature (talk • contribs) 19:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Boundaries changed

message: I wonder if it should be noted in the results (and possibly elsewhere in the article) that while Gerald Kaufman first became the MP for Gorton in 1983, he had been the MP for Manchester Ardwick since 1970. The Ardwick constituency was abolished for the 1983 election and the redrawn Gorton (which was significantly different to the seat as it existed prior to 1983 with a good chunk of it moving to the new Denton and Reddish seat) took in a large chunk of the old Ardwick. Thus in a sense Kaufman was an incumbent. I feel that as it stands it appears that Kaufman was a totally new candidate, when the reality is for a significant portion of the electorate he was the sitting MP in 1983. I would welcome others' thoughts on this. Dunarc (talk) 22:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gerald Kaufman in 1983
Talk:Manchester Piccadilly Gardens bus station

message: It would be useful include a map in the article to show which stops are in the bus station and which in the nearby streets.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: Should the name of the article not be Manchester Piccadilly Gardens bus station. This is the name in common use, and what TfGM use - see []
Also what's used on first line of page
OxonAlex (talk) 18:41, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Eicosanoid receptor

message: Sure glad we have TWO cited references for the profound intro paragraph here: "An eicosanoid receptor is a receptor which detects eicosanoids."  Gene Nygaard (talk) 22:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your note. Indeed the lead of the article was a little ridiculous, in part, because out of laziness I deleted some of the original text.  I have re-added and re-worded this text to emphasize that the two cited references are meant to document that the majority of these receptors are G protein-coupled and more importantly to document the list of eicosanoid GPCRs which follows these two citations in this article.  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 23:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I wasn't overly concerned about it, it just struck me as a little funny.  Glad you noticed my comment and acted on it--and despite my comment, I was glad to see the references there anyway in the first place.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 09:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh!!??
Talk:The Printworks (Manchester)

message: This article is so poor - I want to die. Is there any history about the building? no History about Mirror group newspapers? no. Sometimes I dispair at the GM project 82.31.107.208 (talk) 03:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Get together Gentlemen

message: My instincts tell me that the refurbishment cost more than £115Mnemonix8001 (talk) 13:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost of refurbishment

message: I have tried to clean up this article, as I had created Edward Hulton (senior) which refers here. The sources about the site's history are generally quite simplistic. There were several former buildings incorporated into the current Printworks site best covered by David Boardman's website. I believe the original publishing building was Hulton's Chronicle Buildings in Mark Lane and the adjoining Kemsley/Thomson/etc House was developed on the corner site the Old Boar's Head Hotel, later the site of a bank, from 1929. I am not 100% sure which building site the 1873 Withy Grove Printing House refers to unfortunately. HelenOnline 17:15, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of original buildings
Talk:Stopford Building

message: When was it made and who was the architect? Billlion (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: and who or what was Stopford?  The building must have been named after something.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.1.93.26 (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Who, when..?
Talk:Sam the Sham

message: Man, I think Wooly Bully deserves its own article. <- edit by 64.122.63.142.
:As does a separate Sam the Sham & the Pharaohs singles and albums discography. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 20:35, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags Nhl4hamilton (talk) 06:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations & References

message: ...in second grade... is not a very good way of describing his age at the time. Second year of what? - Tournesol (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Second grade in the US school system would be about 7 or 8 years old. Kindergarten starts at five. Or it did when Sam was going to primary school, dunno about now. 210.22.142.82 (talk) 04:46, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Second grade?

message: This entry spells Sam's last name as "Zamudio."  The record label for "Wooly Bully" (among others) spells it "Samudio." 67.186.129.90 (talk) 13:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Sam's Last Name 

message: Drums are contagious i still play. 2600:387:0:982:0:0:0:11 (talk) 00:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My dad Jerry Patterson
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/TobytheTramEngine

message: Sorry, but I am right on one of my edit summaries. This RfA doesn't appear to be constructive and will have to be deleted. Afraid any of you won't win this one, I can't think of another way right now. TobytheTramEngine 20:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Mh, I would advise not to. I commented on your RfA yesterday (although not officialy opened, mainly because you asked for advice here. If you see my comments, they are reasons as to why your RfA has only a small chance of succeeding. I have no doubt of your ability to make a good administrator when those concerns have been addressed, but until that time comes, I would have to oppose your RfA. Hope this helps,  Qst 14:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. But it's schedule ended on October 12, 2007. TobytheTramEngine 01:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, I explained this on WT:RFA. If you  create your adminship page then change your mind, or someone offers to nominate you and you decline it, you would create Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/USERNAME 2, replacing the USERNAME with your username. This is another reason why I stronlgy advise against you going for RfA, you clearly do not understand the procccess. Please see Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship and WP:RCA for nominations which have succeeded in the past - which will help you along your way. However, remember that we are not here to gain adminship, we are here to build the encyclopedia. Qst 17:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, does that mean I can't do another RFA but making sure I answer the three questions correctly? TobytheTramEngine 18:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, are you reading my comments? I have already explained this on WT:RFA to you, and above. Please read it. Qst 19:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, sorry. Anyway, shall I read both Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship and WP:RCA slowly? TobytheTramEngine 19:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry if I sounded a little snappy above, I didn't mean to :). I would suggest reading the guide to requests for adminship, and some (not advisable to read all of the successful adminship nominations - or you'd be there all night), they will serve as a guideline to what the community expects of potential administrators. Cheers, Qst 20:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. I read both of them. TobytheTramEngine 20:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Greatest Hits Radio Manchester & The North West

message: I have memories of Piccadilly creating dramas in its early days --- there are three that I can remember: 'The Last Rose of Summer', 'The Hunters Moon' and 'The Babylon Run'... a trilogy in a surprisingly restrained three parts by Steve Gallagher, the first part made it out as a book ; as far as I'm aware the other two parts did not, but I'd love to be proved wrong there!
Would it be appropriate to make mention of such a connection to show that local independant radio stations were not set up solely to pump out none stop pop?
--Geoff Riley (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drama 

message: Sorry to report that the Chris Tetley who presented the rock shows on Piccadilly Radio was not, in fact, a left-handed Worcestershire batsman who bowled leg breaks and to whom the link directs you. He was from Macclesfield, was a monumental piss-artist, stood for the Monster Raving Loony Party, and was an absolutely top bloke. I should also mention that he's been dead for quite some years. I'm afraid this might not be eligible for Wikipedia, since it's primary research - I had the pleasure and privilege of working with him for about eight years IIRC. His death certificate stated that he died of rock'n'roll. Not really, but it might as well have. A good lad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.70.64.53 (talk) 23:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Tetley 

message: This article is just incorrect. Piccadilly Radio became Key 103 on FM.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.27.68.115 (talk) 18:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key 103 
Talk:Refuge Assurance Company

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "Royal London corporate profile" :
** 
** Royal London corporate profile
DumZiBoT (talk) 20:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references !
Talk:Royal Exchange Theatre, Manchester

message: The article opens with The Royal Exchange Theatre is a producing theatre. What is producing theatre?? --Jotel (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  producing theatre  

message: I feel this article would benefit greatly from a shot of the theatre "pod" showing how it fits within the historic building. Can anyone in Manchester contribute such a pic? Casper Gutman (talk • contributions) 17:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Royal Exchange, Manchester

message: see discussion at WT:GM Pit-yacker (talk) 14:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: does this merger discussion still exist? If it's in an archive could you tell us which? Tia Icarusgeek (talk) 18:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: This section seems to be a couple of years out of date. If it has ended then the section should be changed to the past tense. Or refreshed with post 2008 info if it's still going-on Icarusgeek (talk) 18:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammypritchard (talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So I see - thanks :-) Icarusgeek (talk) 17:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruntwood Competition 

message: I've tagged this as being unclear, and now that I come to add the recommended talk page, am just wondering if it's simply that "would be presented" should be "would have been presented"?Icarusgeek (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindle Wakes 

message: Might it be an idea to have a separate article for the theatre?J3Mrs (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I think would be a very good to seperate the building, which is more than the theatre, and the theatre. I was looking for information on the theatre and was quite confused by the structure of the article. Michtrich (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Exchange Theatre 