Talk:The God Makers

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject class rating

message: I am wondering, since it's a couple decades old now, has this film been released to the public to view for free yet, or is the copyright holder still asking for sale money? Tyciol (talk) 15:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The video linked above has been removed, but I found another link at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H52Ix9YIVE4. Kingsfold (talk) 03:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Available to view?

message: Currently The God Makers redirects here. I think it's more appropriate to move this article there. Having film in parenthesis only seems necessary if there were something else using the name to help disambiguate from it. Since this is the only known thing going by that name, I think it would be much simpler to remove the parenthesis via a move there. This location can be redirected there, unlike the other way around as it currently is. Obviously the edit history needs to be retained so redirection is much more important than deletion. Tyciol (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason that it is listed as "film" is because there is a book by the same name. This article only deals with the movie and not the book. If you wish to move it, then this material should be noted as only dealing with the film version. Bochica (talk) 18:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I have just rolled back a series of edits by User:Frank777w because the substantial portions of the edits appear to belong on a talk page and not in the main article. The article is not the place to discuss points of view. Please follow Wikipedia policy and discuss proposed major and/or controversial changes to the article here on this page. Thanks, Jusdafax 18:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rollback of edits by Frank777w

message: Mr. Erik predicates, "User:Frank777w is constantly vandalizing this article. I suggest we get a moderator involved.--Mr. Erik" (talk) 23:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Allow me to assure you that I have not seen the movie, know little about the Mormon Church, and have no stake in anything other than helping build an encyclopedia.  You are welcome to discuss the issue further here, on this talk page, and build a consensus for what changes you advocate to this article (reading Wikipedia:Consensus may help you, as well as WP:RS.  Right now I lean towards Mr. Erik's views, and feel, as he appears to, that you may well need a moderator to be involved in this matter.  But do try to talk it over here first. Right now the article is hardly encyclopedic, wouldn't you say? Here's a hint: do you have any sources for reference, that are not involved with the Mormon Church, that you can cite? That would be a good start, and it's the core of how Wikipedia operates. Jusdafax 21:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

text: P.S. A tip on signing. Add 4 tildes (4 of these ~) and your signature will be added with no further effort. Jusdafax 21:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

text: A brief further thought; even if sources are from the Mormon church, they could be used to cite material to counter the movie's views, as you appear to be concerned with doing. Jusdafax 22:08, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia has rules and guidelines. Disregarding these rules and guidelines is inherently disruptive. Putting discussion about the article in the article is vandalism. Putting personal commentaries in a summary is vandalism, unless you're just ignorant then it's technically not. There's nothing wrong with putting published information or opinion in article. You can't just put your personal thoughts into an article. That's what blogs are for. Whether or not I have seen the film is irrelevant. If you're still confused you can always press the help button.--Mr. Erik (talk) 02:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism of Rollback by Jusdafax and Mr. Erik