Talk:Tom Suozzi

message: Sept 6 birthday? Is it really? Chivista 19:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: that s/b better than naked. Bona Fides 20:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI unabashed 

message: I gave Suozzi in the win in this article because it doesn't matter. Bona Fides 19:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI debate win 

message: Suozzi may be a Democrat with his demand for abortion on demand, but he's not a Catholic. Catholics oppose abortion. A cat may have kittens in the oven but that doesn't make them biscuits! Change it to an agnostic Democrat by Monday or I will.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.9.224 (talk) 02:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I enjoy menacing ultimatums as much as the next guy, but you should really read WP:NOTSOAPBOX, WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND, WP:NPOV, and WP:VERIFY before editing.  -- DanielPenfield (talk) 08:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic 

message: I note that there have been a lot of recent contributions from this single-purpose account, and that they are very promotional in tone.  Given the propensity for over-capitalization, they are likely written by someone who works in government where that's a common shortcoming.--~TPW 02:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yikes, yeah. I went ahead and rolled the article back to its April 2020 version because there had been so much COI editing happening. Marquardtika (talk) 19:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  apparent SPA activity 

message: The two sources don't support that Santos claimed to be a finance executive, and I haven't found any other sources that do. With recent developments, I think this could use a rewrite, but I'm not sure how to restate it. -- Pemilligan (talk) 13:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the phrase "a finance executive" from the prose.  Maybe once the sources are clearer a different phrase can be added in. ~TPW 14:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Santos 

message: Why did he not do oppo research on Devolder Santos? 88.97.108.45 (talk) 17:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure he's asking himself the same question. Marquardtika (talk) 04:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He did win by 12 points so probably not losing much sleep over it. Thmymerc (talk) 16:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did he not do oppo research on Devolder Santos? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved  – bradv 16:47, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thomas Suozzi →  – WP:COMMONNAME. About 174 sources in Google News use "Thomas Suozzi", while about 300 use "Tom Suozzi".  estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 November 2023 

message: Thanks for updating my edit on Suozzi! IEditPolitics (talk) 03:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: And your correction "2023" is valid, too. I fell for the article from the Independent that stated: "Should Mr Suozzi regain the seat he vacated in 2021, ..."--Nomirto (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks