Talk:Microcar

message: Why has Bubble car been redirected here? Bubble car is a much more familiar term. Mintguy 14:56, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: * The Bruce Weiner Microcar Museum
*The Microcar & Minicar Club  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed.minutia (talk • contribs) 22:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: It seems to me that minis start at bout 500 cc.  I don't know whether to call the Fiat 500 a mini or micro.  I think it was a mini.  It was designed to hold 5 people.  Certainly the Fiat 600 was not a micro.  So why are people calling the Smart a micro?  Also, 740 kg. is as much as a VW Beetle and nothing at all like an Isetta.  I see 350 kg. for the Isetta and 240 kg. for the weight of a Messerschmitt.  On the other hand the original 2CV might be considered a micro because of its 375 cc. engine, even though it was rather large.
I vote for 400 cc. and 400 kg. as limits and length and volume too if others want.  That is around the weight of the original 2CV which seems to be on the border.  Certainly larger engined 2CVs were minis.
I might make an exception for the Corbin Sparrow, if necessary, because of the weight of the batteries.
Interior volume does not help much because sports cars are not microcars (except maybe small engined ones like the Messerschmitt TG500 and Berkeley).
(One could make a case for decreasing these as time goes on to compensate for improvements in materials, engines and other technology.)
Maybe we should keep a link to the Smart, saying it is the closest mass produced thing currently available.
As for the picture, how about the BMW Isetta.  The Messerschmitts were not typical of microcars because they were for motorway use. David R. Ingham
I added qualification to the statement that the Smart is considered a micro-car.  I really still think it is rather heavy to be considered a mini-car.  David R. Ingham 05:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, wierd, isn't it? Twenty years ago the "supermini" class Mk2 VW Polo had a kerb weight of about 750kg (the somewhat more modern mk3, which I owned, being ~850kg) and could, at a push, seat five people and take all their luggage (well, with a roofrack or some in-cabin compromising). Now that unladen weight is only seen in 2-seater near-zero-luggage "micro" cars. That's NCAP for you, I guess :-) 82.46.180.56 (talk) 04:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

text: 2CV is not a microcar but a good reference for micro cars and mini cars. 31.206.142.238 (talk) 06:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the line between micro and mini? 

message: I just noticed the comment on the Smart.  It needs to be either "The Smart", if it is the name of a car or other brand name or "A smart" if it means any car with artificial intelligence.
:The brand of car is "smart", without capitalization. This is so because the manufacturer says it is so.Respectfully, SamBlob 23:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Grammer"?? 82.46.180.56 (talk) 04:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see MOS:TM which says, "Capitalize trademarks, as with proper names", "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official"" and "avoid: thirtysomething is a television show that may have been sponsored by adidas, but not by craigslist, because the show was over before craigslist existed. Instead, use: Thirtysomething is a television show that may have been sponsored by Adidas, but not by Craigslist, because the show was over before Craigslist existed."So it's Smart for the purposes of Wikipedia, matey.86.0.203.120 (talk) 01:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization and grammer. 

message: A minicar maybe.
--
I never thought there was a minicar category. Maybe we need a teenycar and punycar category too? Tho I agree the GEM isn't a micro.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.183.24 (talk) 02:33, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GEM is probably to large to be a microcar. 

message: Can someone verify this? I found a site linking to 329 other micro-car related websites, and none of them calls a microcar a station car. Quick search on Google didn't give a satisfying result either. Can someone come up with a reliable source please? Pim Rijkee (talk) 17:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another name for microcar is Station Car 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Microcar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030054809/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/andy.carter/ to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/andy.carter/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Tiny car. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27#Tiny car until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Clarityfiend (talk) 21:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tiny car" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Fuldamobil might be added to this article. It has been produced in many countries.
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuldamobil (models N, s1 to s7)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuldamobil (licenced production) 31.206.142.238 (talk) 06:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuldamobil (Nobel 200)