lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:David Warthen

message: 67.120.120.185 has attempted three times to delete a paragraph from this article without explanation in violation of WP:3RR.  These are the only edits this user has ever made.
*well, first of all, you need to understand 3RR better. This can't be a violation of 3RR, for two reasons: 3RR prohibits more than three reverts, not three or more; and it prohibits them within 24 hours, not three months apart. What's more, the earlier change wasn't a revert; it was a plain ordinary edit. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I reverted a recent (unsourced) addition about Schultz. WLRoss has put back a good version of the material, but why is it on this page? There is an article on Cristina Schultz which mentions the new material. This page is about David Warthen, and naturally it should say who is his wife, but it's hardly encyclopedia style to put details about the wife on the wife's page and on this page. Is there a reason for keeping this material here? I'm inclined to remove it. --Johnuniq (talk) 09:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are details of wife's legal problems on this page?
Talk:Friendship House

message: The Chicago Friendship House web site -- www.friendshiphouse.org -- seems to be non-functional. Has the Chicago house closed? I see there is now a Peoria Friendship House which traces its roots to the Chicago house -- perhaps it IS the Chicago house, just moved? I'd welcome someone to continue detailing what happened to Friendship House after the departure of its foundress Catherine Doherty. - Mecandes 16:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Wyandot language

message: What is a good name for a wendat/huron person?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.3.72 (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAMES 

message: The main text says that Wyandot died out several centuries ago (not likely given how much is known about the language) and the box on the right side says it died out in 1961.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.179.64.223 (talk) 06:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions 

message: Some parts of the article treat Wendat and Wyandot as only different names for exactly the same thing; other parts of the article treat them as related but definitely not the same. I can't tell whether this means reliable sources disagree about the actual facts, or reliable sources agree on the facts but disagree about what names to use, or if some of this article comes from unreliable sources. 
If reliable sources disagree, don't make up their minds for them. But it's necessary to SAY they disagree, explicitly, and in enough places - otherwise this article starts to look like it's full of mistakes. TooManyFingers (talk) 19:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably split part of this article to be a separated Wendat language? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what is happening is that there is disagreement whether Wendat is an ancestor of Wyandot or a separate language. If it is a separate language, it died out a few centuries ago, but if it is an ancestor of Wyandot, then it died out when Wyandot did, i.e. the 60s/70s. Either way it was in the 20th century that Wyandot died out before its revival. Would it be better to have a separate article for Wendat or a particular section of this article dedicated to Wendat? Electricbrass (talk) 19:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

text: I've gone ahead and created a separate Wendat language article draft and will move information from this one to it as I work on updating this one Electricbrass (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of the Wendat/Wyandot relationship
Talk:Impetus

message: I was going to edit the article, but found this message in the edit page: <--- This is not a stub - all the info is at Inertia but needs to be there for the history to read properly - this article is to provide a tag for the Category:Obsolete scientific theories. --->
Well, I still feel that the impetus theory of motion deserves an explanation in its own article (this one).  --Leinad ¬  pois não? 16:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote the message - be bold! Cutler 22:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ho-Chunk language

message: The Winnebago/Ho-Chunk are not a tribe, though they may have once been a tribal people. Their governments are "Tribes", but that is something different. — kwami (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tribe" 

message: Why does it say that "Ho-Chunk has aspirated /p/ and /k/ phonemes but no aspirated /t/." and yet the phonemic inventory shows ejectives not aspirates? Is this a typo?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.154.65.167 (talk) 04:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonemic inventory 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 14:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Winnebago language →  – The people that speak this language article is named Ho-Chunk and the mythology is under Ho-Chunk mythology. This article should match the naming conventions already used on Wikipedia for the sake of consistency.
New dictionaries created by the Ho-Chunk Nation use Ho-Chunk over Winnebago in reference to their language. The dictionary, at dictionary.hochunk.org, contains more than 11,000 entries, each accompanied by audio pronunciation of the word or phrase and is the first online version of their dictionary, along with the app version. See: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes)#Self-identification as well.  oncamera  (talk page) 09:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 May 2023
Talk:County Road 308B (Putnam County, Florida)

message: As this page is now a redirect please post any new comments at Talk:List of county roads in Putnam County, Florida 
I disagree with the proposed deletion.  Although the article needs to be cleaned up, expanded, and categorized, there is ample precedent that routes numbered on a statewide system are noteworthy, and there are other articles on routes by discontinued numbers.  Anyone who disagrees with me is welcome to follow the AfD procedure.  Thank you.  Doctor Whom 16:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nelson's syndrome

message: Flagged statement that is "original research." I do not know enough about this topic to correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukelahood (talk • contribs) 00:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: The article should start off saying what it is, not when it occurs.  I'm not familiar enough with the subject to fix this myself. NickelShoe 17:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context
Talk:Hauberk

message: use maille rather than mail, makes for easier text searching to distinguish from letters. Any objections? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Talroth (talk • contribs).
:I object. "Maille" is not an English term, it is French. "Mail" is the spelling used in just about every English source. It should not be changed as a matterof convenience. Context should prove sufficient for differentiation, as is typically the case with language. --Eyrian 19:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with Eyrian, mail is the english term and this is the english wikipedia. DDH89 (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of Spelling?

message: I've removed every instance of the neologism 'chain mail' from this article. My main issue is that the term is tautological - mail is, by definition, made of chained links and so it is useless to add 'chain'. It's also ahistorical, to the best of my knowledge it was coined very recently. Let's leave the 'chain mail' for D&D. DDH89 (talk) 22:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chain Mail

message: I changed the sentence stating that hauberks and mail were used "up until the 14th century" to "through the 14th century".  Chaucer mentions a knight wearing a haubergeon in his Canterbury Tales, written at the end of the 14th century. (, line 76)--Tabun1015 00:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of hauberks 

message: This claim is unsupported, and doesn't hold up to even casual logic. Why would functional armor be dismantled for use in a kitchen? More likely it would be handed down to a knight or lord's men at arms until totally used up. Maille is not cheap and even if largely supplanted by plate would be of more use on the field than in the kitchen. --Agent032125  —Preceding comment was added at 06:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as scouring pads 

message: The old german word bergen isn't the modern german word bergen, which means to save or to salvage something, but it is the old form of the word verbergen meaning to hide something or in this case to cover or to protect the neck. -- 79.224.172.84 (talk) 19:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Halsberge 

message: The hauberk in that second picture looks very heavy. And I imagine the only points on the body to carry all that weight are the shoulders. Surely, there must be some information available about the practicality of mail shirts in the context of weight and comfort, and whether this problem might have contributed to the demise of this form of armor. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Weight

message: "Haubergeon ("little hauberk") generally refers to the quilted undergarment used with a hauberk, but the terms are sometimes used interchangeably."
This is simply wrong. I see that there is a citation, but the authors of the book cited were mistaken. A haubergeon is a small hauberk, the padded garment worn under the mail is a gambeson or aketon. 67.221.111.164 (talk) 02:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haubergeon
Template talk:Drinking games

message: The games currently listed in this template are notably US-centric. That's not surprising (and they'd be UK-centric if I'd written it) but I think the balance could do with being evened up a bit. Obviously we want to avoid having everyone's favourite game added to the template; avoiding the appearance of that is why I haven't gone ahead and changed it. I'd appreciate some discussion here on the matter so that the list of games can be altered/extended with some consensus.
In particular, I'd suggest that Arrogance and Bunnies are sufficiently common (and widespread) UK games, certainly the equal of 21. Obviously I'm not qualified to judge on American games, but if we need to save space could the various "Pong"s be reduced to a single link? PeteVerdon 17:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I apprecaite the UK getting involved on this. Jolly good! I was hoping that drinking culture isnt limited to american twenty-somethings :) . I am particularly intrested in if theres pong like games in the UK, and specifically if Beer Pong is played in the UK.  I have converged some of the items to give you guys some room to add additional items. Cheers! --Larsinio 17:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The current vertical template is horrible.  The template should be horizontal, so that it doesn't interfere with the corresponding article's text or images.  I'll be working the next couple of days to redesign it so that the template can be added to the bottom of articles.  --Brownings (talk) 11:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that didn't take long.  Hope everyone enjoys the changes.  --Brownings (talk) 12:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template layout

message: This template is strictly for games, not for races, not for simple events without rules.Curb Chain (talk) 22:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This template is for drinking games. The term 'drinking game' has a broader scope than the naive union of 'drinking' and 'game'. For example, on this very talk page there's reference to the Yard of ale as a drinking game. Your cull was also indiscriminate, as the vast majority of the entries you deleted do in fact have rules and goals. Oreo Priest talk 03:33, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You might be able to safely add back Ice luge as well. "Curb Chain" (CC) has an unfortunate, sorted history with that article that can be seen on its talk page. In general, you can pretty much ignore CC's "concerns" over these kind of issues. Guy1890 (talk) 08:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, I've restored it. You might find it interesting to note that CC has recently been blocked from editing all list articles for aggressive and consensus-violating deletionism. See User_talk:Curb_Chain#Topic_ban. Oreo Priest talk 15:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, I'm the one that initiated that discussion at AN/I. Happy editing... Guy1890 (talk) 20:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entries that are not games
Talk:Icing (food)

message: I created this stub because I saw a broken link. I'm happy for it to merge with icing; I don't know what else there is to say about buttercream. Just keep that information aflowing. 57.66.51.165 17:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: There's more to say about buttercream for sure, this article doesn't even list the major types much less what the differences are. the pineapple 05:32, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There we go, how's that for something to say about buttercream? the pineapple 06:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more info 

message: According to my colleague frosting and icing are two completely separate words and icing should be paired with Royal icing instead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MwattsCIA (talk • contribs) 17:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification between icing and frosting; source of name 

message: I have created a gallery to collect photos to showcase a variety of icing varieties. SpiritedMichelle (talk) 03:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery
Talk:Yard of ale

message: The Yard of Ale was featured in the movie, "Oxford Blues" (1984), starring Rob Lowe.
Scoobots2012 (talk) 19:26, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movies Featured In 

message: According to description, and math, this yard should hold 6.4 liters of "ale" not 1.4.
161.28.104.72 (talk) 17:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: It's as Zidanie5 said. --Stfg (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 28 October 2013 

message: "A yard of ale ... is a very tall beer glass". It's not. The "yard glass" is the glass; a "yard of ale" is the amount of ale that fills it. 86.136.110.44 (talk) 19:07, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence is wrong! 

message: He holds the record for drinking a yard of ale, 4.9 seconds—see the Wilipedia entry on Dowdeswell. I don't know whether that's a Guinness-sanctioned record. But it should be mentioned when you list the 5-second record. And who holds that record?
KC 19:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Dowdeswell 
Talk:Anti-English sentiment

message: I have recently edited this discussion after i found that the author or someone else who had come through and edited had put a political statement in here trying to force their political opinion on this discussion. Even though i am very into politics i firmly say as most people somethings need to stay unbiased and remain netral for a good source of information. 
-Salty Dawg Over and Over  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B13A:771E:5D38:5FDA:6D99:CFFD (talk) 18:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I reverted the edit because what was removed seemed to be relevant material from a reliable source. I appreciate you bringing the issue to the Talk page for discussion. The paragraph in question is about a study by Hussain and Millar published by the ESRC. The conclusions seem relevant to the topic of the article. Could I clarify -- is it your position that the article text was not a correct summary of the source, or is it that you feel the source to be unreliable, or perhaps something else? I note you say the contribution was "political opinion", however, it seems to be reporting survey findings, not merely stating one author's opinion. If it does represent a POV perhaps it needs balancing by opposing views from other sources. FrankP (talk) 19:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Political comments. 

message: I wonder if there should be a section on the Anglophobia present in on-line spaces, like websites such as Reddit.  This and sites like it are popular sites for discussion of numerous topics and often host Anglopbic views and expressions. 2A02:C7C:3324:8A00:7EA8:8221:FB6:9ACF (talk) 01:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglophobia in on-line spaces. 

message: USA section of 18,736 bytes was deleted on August 10, 2021‎ by user 2409:4061:2dca:e4d4:e17f:286:a275:f682  -- he tried to move it to the Anti-British article but it was rejected there, and he quit Wikipedia.  He left the bibliography re USA untouched. I have restored the  USA section as it existed on  July 30, 2021 = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-English_sentiment&oldid=1036276313  Rjensen (talk) 23:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States section restored
Talk:Causes of autism

message: I moved this theory out of the "Discredited theories" section. No source was provided for the claim that it has been discredited. You can't call a theory "discredited" unless you (at a minimum) you have a reliable source calling it that. (Really, to call a theory "discredited", you want multiple high quality reliable sources saying that; a bar which is rather easy to reach for vaccine-related theories, but I don't think it is going to be reached for social constructionist theories.) SJK (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Social construct" theory 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rahneli (talk) 20:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: this came to me as a surprise, I've never heard of this before and can't seem to find any sources for it. I've looked at the references for that sentence and didn't find any mention of reduced fecundity, nor a "20 times less likely to have children" figure. should this passage be removed? StandardUser2 (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "individuals with autism have significantly reduced fecundity"
Talk:Pegasus Award

message: I tried to link to the category 'Pegasus Award Winners,' but it put the entry in the category instead. Not sure how to fix. Not sure it necessarily needs to be fixed. Either way. :-> --EloiseMason 17:41, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Listing all the winners turns this page into a proxy for the award website; the level of detail is classic fancruft, especially for an award that the community did not confirm as notable (no consensus is not a "keep").  So the details should be removed. Jytdog (talk) 20:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: (edit conflict) I'd removed a good faith excessive detail tag and was reverted. Looking at the page, unless it means the list of awards (a common thing on awards pages), I don't see any excessive detail. What am I missing? Thanks. AFTEREDITCONFLICT: There is nothing unusual about listing award winners on an awards page. It is encyclopedic as to songs and winners. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:38, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fancruft
Talk:Pope Pius III

message: Does 1502 count as early renaissance in Siena? Ian Spackman 17:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call: High Renaissance is the better designation. --Wetman 05:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The 9 May birthdays page links to this article, but the article states that Pope Pius III's birthday is, in fact, 29 May.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevebeck (talk • contribs) 01:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday?
Talk:Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt

message: "...this period was best known as when the Hebrews were slaves in Egypt". I doubt that there is actual evidence of this; this theory is widely debated by Egyptologists and should not be stated here as fact. Stoa 17:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Tenth dynasty of Egypt - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: See the radiocarbon dates in this article or the one in Science and adjust accordingly.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2010/06/new-dates-egypts-pharaohs
100.15.120.122 (talk) 20:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  dates are off kilter 

message: The text says "Akhenaten born Amenhotep IV", which is nonsense. He was an adult with a wife and at least 3 children when he came to the throne, so it makes no sense to say he was born with a royal name. Lazyzee (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  error in text of Gallery of Images
Talk:Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom (Rachmaninoff)

message: Tchaikovsky also wrote a Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom (his Op. 41).  Perhaps this article should cover both Rachmaninoff's and Tchaikovsky's settings?  Especially since Rachmaninoff was so influenced by Tchaikovsky... Adso de Fimnu 17:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Phenomena (film)

message: It says in this article that Jamie McDaniel is a physician. That's 100% false. I attended PSU while he taught there, and he is an English professor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bklick (talk • contribs) 19:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Jamie McDaniel

message: The article itself isn't classified as stub anymore. Members of the WikiProjects should therefore modify the templates on top of this page and assign another class. Bisco 08:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub class

message: The film score in the film is taken from multiple sources as stated in the prose. The infobox is not supposed to reflect a producers wishes or a film credits in a certain version of a film. Like any infobox, it is used to reflect information within the article. Per WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE, "keep in mind the purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article". Stating that Goblin did the score, regardless of what the credits say, is flat out not factual. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the sources added recently, even re-states this, Fact notes "[http://www.factmag.com/2014/07/30/goblins-soundtrack-to-dario-argentos-phenomena-finally-receives-proper-vinyl-pressing/ as usual for Argento, the film sported a natty soundtrack from cult Italian prog heroes Goblin, well, sort of. A short score was composed by Goblin’s Claudio Simonetti and Fabio Pignatelli, and was fleshed out with stadium fillers from Iron Maiden and Motörhead." Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:15, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Film score

message: On amazon  there is some edition with side-by-side 3D visuals - does anyone know if there were two cameras during filming? --Trickstar (talk) 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  3D version?