lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:PokerFace

message: :Will there be another series of PokerFace? 17:15, 17 July 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.246.75 (talk • contribs) 
::At this present time, nothing has been announced as far as I know. Schizmatic 18:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, yes, there is. It's on now.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.80.105 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

text: TV Scoop implies that there will be another series.... -- Smjg 23:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To disambiguate the term "poker face", I would suggest moving this article to PokerFace (game show).  If no-one objects, I will go ahead and move it and then redirect this page to the disambiguation page. GeneralBelly (talk) 18:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 10:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: PokerFace →  – I don't think a missing space is enough to meet WP:SMALLDIFFS, as it is reasonable for someone searching for this to search for Poker Face not knowing it might be one word.  In fact, the old Freemantle website listed uses the two word form for its own show on its old webpage listing.  There was a previous move with low participation above, but it's hard to double check the common name with the very limited sources in the article and my own searches are being overwhelmed by the new Poker Face (TV series), which this move will help disambiguate against, still meeting WP:NCTV. (Not opposed to Poker Face (game show) if people go that way based on stylization rules and the Freemantle link.) - 2pou (talk) 16:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Support - many people also think they are expecting to search for Poker Face (song) which is a more popular article than others. You'd think this game show title would be two words when searching "Poker Face game show" on Google ( then the results give the title without the space. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 April 2022
Talk:Queen Alexandra's Mounted Rifles

message: The description of QAMR as it is now organized is ambiguous. The regiment is equipped with infantry vehicles, but do they contain infantry? My understanding is that they are vehicle crew only, and that the regiment would be operationally combined with infantry from the RNZIR in battle. This should be clarifiedRoyalcourtier (talk) 23:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armoured, reconnaissance or armoured infantry?
Talk:Queen Alexandra's Royal Army Nursing Corps

message: Are the members of this Corps uniformed or Civilian personnel?  IOW do they undergo the same training to get into the Army and can they transfer to different corps.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.150.59.65 (talk) 19:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They are uniformed soldiers just like any other Army personnel. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was vaccinated by a QA nurse on 16 March. Is the role of the QAs notable enough to add to tne article. Stub Mandrel (talk) 19:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assiting with Covid-19 Vaccination Programme
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Alpha TV

message: The listings should include original programming with the years active. The syndicated and foreign shows should be listed separately, with years active being optional, and not require detailed explanation. Also it needs to not look like someone's TV guide blurb to get you to watch the show. Once it's clear of advertising bias then you can resubmit for copyedit if appropriate. Thanks. AngusWOOF (talk) 21:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: More data please

message: Can the show titles be formatted consistently? Like:
* Poios thelei na ginei ekatommyriouchos (Ποιος θέλει να γίνει εκατομμυριούχος, Who wants to become a millionaire?)   AngusWOOF (talk) 21:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Title formatting
Template talk:WikiProject Bodybuilding

message: I have boldly reformatted this template to be compliant/consistent with other WikiProjects. However, it still retains the ability to become "small," mimicking its previous design. TAnthony 06:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Bob Paris for an example of the  in action, and Talk:National Physique Committee for the "small" version of the box in use. TAnthony 06:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template redesign
Talk:Anna Russell, Duchess of Bedford

message: The article states that Anna, Duchess of Bedford drank Darjeeling tea in her legendary pioneering afternoon teas.  Darjeeling tea, however, did not become a commercial export until about the time she died.  It is much more likely that she drank China tea.
208.87.248.162 (talk) 15:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Darjeeling tea??
Talk:List of programs broadcast by CTV and CTV 2

message: It says "Just For Laughs Gags" aired on the network.  I don't remember it being on CTV.  I remember it being on CBC.  Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 19:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Just For Laughs Gags" 

message: i'm tired of CTV being labeled a "Canadian broadcaster" despite playing so many American programs which are on ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC anyway.  The only "Canadian" part is the CTV logo and the commercials, especially when we can't see Super Bowl commercials.  :(
Anyway, my point is, good job for labeling primetime content in red if it is Canadian.  But what about the rest of the programming?  i suggest we put it in bold, or create a morning schedule.  Thanks.  --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 23:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: All currently playing Canadian content has a check mark in a green box.  Other programs have an "X" in a red box.  This is to emphasize that CTV is becoming less and less of a Canadian broadcaster, and Canada's culture is at risk.  --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian content 

message: It is proposed that List of programs broadcast by CTV Two should be merged into this article.
Why?: Because CTV's programming and CTV Two's programming is changing everyday and will switch often, if we put these all in one article it will be not as many changes everyday and CTV puts programming on CTV Two if stuff is on at the same time, will this happens often and is impossible to keep up. TBrandley (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested merge 

message: Why does this page separate "American" from "Foreign" shows. Most of the "Foreign" shows are American. Please merge or re-edit. There's too many for me to wade through. And update dates: Anger Management "will" premiere in 2012?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.55.176.138 (talk) 20:06, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: i'm unable to go through all of them right now, but as one current example, CTV airs the Australian series Satisfaction.  i could be wrong, though.  i think the best approach is to move all American shows in an American section and everything else can be in Foreign/International.  i think CTV should be ashamed for having so many non-Canadian shows outnumbering their Canadian ones.  --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 22:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Just went through half the list.  It's not that difficult: most of the shows are American.  --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 17:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  American versus foreign shows
Talk:Mangrol, Gujarat

message: Mangrol, Gujarat - this page has one error for one of the alternate language page where another city i.e. Mangrol Rajasthan is depicted and attached to this page, thus a disambiguation page needed and Mangrol, Rajasthan should be de-linked. 
Patelurology2 (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page needed for Mangrol
Talk:RAF Ferry Command

message: Perhaps a list of the kind of aircraft that were transferred, possibly grouped by year? RoyBatty42 (talk) 05:06, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Aircraft type

message: This extraordinary operation deserves fuller coverage, especially of its transatlantic genesis, the extreme danger of the ferrying missions, and the other secret missions accomplished. For war history enthusiasts, there seems to be ample material available for such expanded coverage in the documentary ‘Flying the Secret Sky: The Story of the RAF Ferry Command’. Ombudswiki (talk) 13:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for a fuller account of RAF Ferry Command and its origins
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Citytv

message: This page was overdue for a Fall 2009 Schedule so I made it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.104.179 (talk) 13:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fall 2009 Schedule

message: I added the dates when they first aired on City Saskatchewan/SCN but I couldn’t find the dates when they stopped airing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.57.43 (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates for Children’s Programming
Template talk:User Berkeley

message: Since this is a user box (and should probably be migriated to userspace at some point), I would argue that the USERS who are using it should have the say in it. Standardization is great for the actual project, but for a userbox it seems like the users should decide, since it's going on their user page.
In that regards, as a user of the template, I'd prefer Cal. --Falcorian (talk) 16:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call, I prefer Cal too for the two simple reasons: 1. It's recognized, 2. It's what the campus uses. But I have no problems userfying this for myself if I'm not in the majority. ~ trialsanderrors 18:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, it would be no problem. --Falcorian (talk) 23:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: UCB vs Cal

message: In partial accordance with the German Userbox Solution, I've added this template to my userspace, at User:Argyriou/Userboxen/cal. Argyriou 23:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: German Userbox Solution
Talk:List of Discovery Channel original programming

message: Last year, there was a show that featured the host using misdirection and other psychological techniques to get people to give up their wallets, watches, and other valuables. He also caused a person on a subway train to forget his destination by telling him to. Anyone recall the show's title?Jlujan69 (talk) 06:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's its name, anyhow? 

message: The link for "Life" goes to the wikipedia article on Life, not the (BBC) TV show as would be expected. darrennie (talk) 05:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Andyross (talk) 15:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Life link

message: The "Animal Games" link redirects me to an punk-rock album.
Did Discovery Channel use to make an punk-rock album, or this link needs disambiguation???Huuduc94 (talk) 07:31, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's refering to this, which seems to have very little to do with punk rock. We don't seem to have an article, so I made a red link for Animal Games (TV series). Brian the Editor (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal Games Link 

message: I'm particular about details. If a program was produced 2002 but not aired before 2003, which year should be used in the list? The article says broadcast, not produced. So in this example I would prefer to use 2003. ------
I'm adding some programs to the list. I put the year I know it was aired, but often I don't know for sure that was the first year it was aired. I trust that someone will correct any mistakes.
I would appreciate a notification on my user page if here are any comments. Urbanus Secundus (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production year or broadcast year? 

message: Because "Weapons of Combat" is so close to "Weapons of War", I have to ask if "Weapons of Combat" is a valid title or if it is a mix-up? I have never seen "Weapons of Combat" on Discovery, but I am familiar with the Discovery series "Weapons of War". It is of course possible that Discovery have aired two similar titles. Urbanus Secundus (talk) 02:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No "Weapons of Combat" can be found either on the Discovery Channel website or a quick Google search. I'd assume that it is a mix-up, however, I'm not an expert at sniffing out these things. Nick1372 (talk) 19:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weapons of Combat? 

message: Killing Fields,  Street Outlaws vs. Fast N' Loud, and Deadliest Catch: Dungeon Cove are missing.68.67.109.78 (talk) 01:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So is Salvage hunters, that antiques-show "hosted" by Drew and T. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 16:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

text: could not find Deadliest Catch: Dungeon Cove, Killing Field got added (not by me) and Salvage Hunters is tv from the UK? Sandi0000 (talk) 00:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Shows
Talk:Mythica

message: Mentioning of the movie series seems to be missing.--Kmhkmh (talk) 21:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Leopoldo O'Donnell

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Page moved to Leopoldo O'Donnell. (non-admin closure)  Vpab15 (talk) 08:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion above is closed.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 Done. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 August 2020 

message: Is this grammatically correct? At? Shouldn't be "He was born in Santa Cruz de Tenerife"? Akiraric (talk) 02:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was born at Santa Cruz de Tenerife in the Canary Islands, a son...?
Talk:Heathrow, Florida

message: * Why was the place named Heathrow? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Series of tubes

message: Please, someone with sufficient knowledge and the time to track down sources, add a section to the article on 
* the extent to which tubes represent a decent analogy to bandwidth and 
* the connection to the issue of net neutrality.
Sure, Ted Stevens was ignorant about this stuff, but with some help, a reader of this article can be better. Hey, Stevens set a low bar. Wikipedia aims higher.
Thanks in advance for any help.
DavidHolmes0 (talk) 15:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: While "tubes" specifically may not be an adequate description of internet traffic, I'm of the mind that internet routing infrastructure is, in fact, adequately described as a series of pipes. Might be worth looking into in terms of the origin of Stevens' misconception. 2001:56A:FB4D:5200:B62E:99FF:FEA3:D19A (talk) 05:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  explain tubes as a decent analogy to bandwidth?
Talk:Olav Ugjæva

message: I wrote 1167 on the civil war page, but on closer reading it seems like Snorre puts the start of the rising to spring 1166. Fornadan (t) 16:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite. I got fooled by Snorre myself - the ambush of Erling Skakke seems to have been 2 February 1167.--Barend 16:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:5th Parachute Brigade (United Kingdom)

message: The section on the mutiny is almost entirely without details.  What were the orders they refused to obey, and why did they refuse to obey them? --Jfruh (talk) 05:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mutiny? 
Talk:Chip art

message: The Chip art article has much of the same content as this section of the Easter egg (virtual). I'm not sure whether these should be merged or not. 66.229.182.113 16:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it should beDarkcraft 12:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Merge

message: The last paragraph in this article is completely NPOV. It reads like someone's boss figured out how to edit Wikipedia. 64.105.66.170 19:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed statement and included reference.   LouScheffer 23:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: The first three paragraphs of the "Creating chip art" section are identical to the corresponding heading on the referenced page from Chipworks.--Henke37 (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Lifting text
Talk:Chilperic II

message: Should the links for the battles in the campaignbox be embedded in the text? Should I create piped links where the text reads "victory at Vincy", "Battle of Amblève", and "battle near Cologne"? Srnec 16:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle links
Talk:Ålesund Airport, Vigra

message: I think that is not to Rygge, but to Gardermoen. I live at Vigra, but there has never been a route to Rygge. Only Gardermoen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.161.238.170 (talk) 18:01, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norwegian to Rygge? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not Moved (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 19:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ålesund Airport, Vigra →  – Official name as per Avinor's website and the convensional name. ᴛʜᴇMᴀɴLK (Talk) 10:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

text: * Oppose per my response in this discussion.  Ved havet 🌊 (talk)  11:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 May 2022
Talk:Scooby-Doo! and the Witch's Ghost

message: Even though there isn't a statistical record, or none I have seen, I have watched almost every Scooby Doo movie played on Cartoon Network several times over, except this one. It seems they have only played this a few times, even in Scooby Doo Movie Marathons. Could it be because of it's dealing with witch's (very possible controversy) and as stated in the theme section, inacurascies (which might insult real world wiccans/pagans)?
::It most certainly would insult real world Wiccans!  Not to mention confuse!  TrevorLSciAct 16:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Least Played 

message: - If you search 'Hex Girls' you just get redirected here even though they are key in Scooby-Doo and the Legend of the Vampire too. Shouldn't the redirect be updated into a disambiguation, an article or be deleted? Azaza767 21:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hex Girls
Talk:Midday (Australian TV program)

message: Surely this text is about a TV programme entitled "Midday", not about midday itself? Coconino 16:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thrown by this as well; I was expecting to be redirected to noon. Ah well. Loganberry (Talk) 20:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Hugh Stowell Brown

message: Is anyone interested in researching the life of Hugh Stowell Brown, or finding out more about him?
I've written a biography of Hugh Stowell Brown. It's called "A Ready Man" by Wayne Clarke and it's published by Instant Apostle. Here's the link to the publisher's website: https://instantapostle.com/books/a-ready-man-hugh-stowell-brown/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dovedale (talk • contribs) 14:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Tisserand's parameter

message: Two questions come to mind:
#Presumably i is the inclination difference between the perturbed and larger bodies?
#The value of 3 is used to distinguish asteroids from certain comets, but how is the distinguishing done? Do the comets have parameter less than or more than 3? 
Deuar 16:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Eurocommuter! :-) Thanks. This name thing is pretty pecuiliar. No fix yet, but i'm still looking into it... Deuar 19:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The link to "David Jewitt page" in "External Links" is obscure.  This page doesn't seem to elucidate the subject; I'd suggest it be dropped.
: I suppose you clicked on 'page' and not on David Jewitt? But I have to agree. Internet resources appear rare. I’m extending slowly the articles  on 3-body problem simple, useful results (Jacobi integral, Tisserand's relation, necessary for TNO and irregulars satellites in particular. But the critical mass is not there, yet. Eurocommuter 17:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the link? 

message: Shouldn't this article be merged with Tisserand's relation which extensively explains the origin of the parameter?
: Yes.—RJH (talk) 23:28, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge ?
Talk:Brigadeiro

message: To clear up a misconception: Nescau is NOT a chocolate powder for cooking, it's a powder for chocolate-milk drink and in fact has been available in other flavours than chocolate. It's closer to Nesquik, in fact (although not exactly the same; Nestlé also sells Nesquik in Brazil). It's also far more recent than the real Nestlé chocolate powder, which is popularly known in Brazil as "Dois Padres" ("Two Priests") for the box illustration, which portrays two friars cooking with chocolate. So, no, brigadeiro was not created with Nescau, it was created with Dois Padres, and Nescau is not suitable at all for a good brigadeiro. MCBastos 16:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misconception

message: In some countries, such as Germany, condensed milk is not as sweetened as in Brazil. Perhaps this should be made clear in the article. --Domusaurea (talk) 23:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that Brigadeiro is a Brazilian sweet, not wanna seem rude, but it was very needless. 177.105.90.10 (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Pls, don't take it personally. 177.105.90.10 (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Condensed milk is not always sweetened

message: Reverted some nonsense added to the end of the second paragraph. New editor, not sure I did this right. Thristhart (talk) 21:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you did fine. Welcome to Wikipedia! ϢereSpielChequers 06:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense reverted
Talk:X-COM: Alliance

message: Quill and Pen (talk) 02:58, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:John Davies Ormond

message: This article is cut-and-paste from http://www.teara.govt.nz/1966/O/OrmondHonJohnDavies/OrmondHonJohnDavies/en
It's not clear to me how crown copyright works, exactly, so I won't say this is a copyvio, but it's certainly not ideal. -Harmil 17:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crown copyright