Talk:Damdami Taksal

message: Pls give reasons for ommisions for AKJ information  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.59.198 (talk) 22:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Akhand Kirtani Jatha

message: I'm nominating this section as needing editorial review for Neutral Point of View, I question the last statement about genocide on a par with Nazi Germany.  Please see WP:NPOV for guidelines. Chuckiesdad (talk) 08:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV questionable in section Declaration of Khalistan & Constitution of the Panthic Committee 

message: Please do not use the term WP:Weasel in the wrong context. The reference  by Martin E. Marty, R. Scott Appleby, John H. Garvey, ed. (1996). Fundamentalisms and the state: remaking polities, economies, and militance. The Fundamentalism Project 3. University of Chicago Press. p. 266.  states "In 1706, when Gobind Singh...he is said to have founded a distinguished school of exegesis.". WP:Weasel does not apply where it is the reference that makes the assertion. Thanks SH 12:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you trying to say the term Damdami Taksal didn't exist, or that Guru Gobind Singh never started a Taksal at Damdama Sahib? Jujhar.pannu (talk) 17:45, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not saying anything. All I am doing is quoting from books of researchers. Many (if not most) Sikh Historians doubt DDT even existed at the time of the Tenth Master. What I think and you think is wholly irrelevant. All we must do is present a WP:NPOV . Thanks SH 00:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

text: I dont understand why you keep removing my referenced content. In your last edit you removed atleast four lines. All scholars agree that Guru Gobind Singh founded a Taksal (school) at Damdama Sahib some call that taksal Baba Deeps Singh's Taksal, some call it Damdami Taksal. My edits clearly explain this rational of different leaders of the Taksal by including titles such as Bhidran Taksal to denote the schools revolving around the Bhindranwale Jathedars. Nevertheless I didnt remove any information that I did not agree with I just added or moved information you must learn to do the same if you want to write in the WP:NPOV style. Jujhar.pannu (talk) 17:31, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually all scholars don't agree the tenth master formed the Taksal. I actually believe he did, but that is irrelevant if researchers and academics can find no proof. Most scholars (read the references in the article) cannot prove the existence of the Taksal until a few years ago. No doubt you will find some obscure scholars who can prove their exitence. The only people who claim to be originated from the tenth master are the Taksal themselves. Thanks SH 08:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Hi again, all scholars agree that their existed a school/taksal at Damdama Sahib where Guru Granth Sahib added Guru Tegh Bahadur hymns to the Guru Granth Sahib making its final form. Its not the Taksal its a Taksal. I will add more information soon which will make this point much more clear because I do agree that the 'term' damdami taksal, which literally means in punjabi the taksal on the run, most likely wasnt used by Guru Gobind Singh to describe a specific intuition but a group of places/taksals that consist of similar forms of traditional Sikh learning carried out in a specific way eg. with a prominent Sant in charge. I reworded the two critical references denying the existence of the Damdami Taksal term because they both point to the term rather than place as I've just described, making them more relevant to the source rather than original research. Jujhar.pannu (talk) 18:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Show me the refrences here and we'll tale a look. I also suggest you learn some proper grammar before making changes to this article and adding incorrent gibberish to it. Thanks SH 19:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Your POV is not important you cannot remove referenced content. Please reply the above questions to have a coherent and productive discussion regarding the original research in the Damdami Taksal term criterion. Jujhar.pannu (talk) 19:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'm trying to keep the article and the way it is written academic, rather than looking like some religious dogmatic pamphlet. Your co-operation would be appreciated. Thanks SH 19:51, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Thank you for leaving those parts back this time. I still have a problem with the event that happened on the 300 year anniversary of Guru Tegh Bahadur's martyrdom could you re-arrange it so the dispute part comes before the 'This was the starting point of tensions between Damdami Taksal and the Indian Congress Government' sentence. Jujhar.pannu (talk) 20:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The edit you've done is fine, butyet again your poor English and Grammar strikes again. You have to do better. The Note you have added is just about acceptable.SH 10:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: [[WP:Weasel]] 

message: The article lacks it. if there is indeed a meaning. Etymology section can be added--DBigXray 12:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting meaning of Damdami 

message: , you should have discussed before removing stuff here. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:32, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2020