Talk:Induced gamma emission/Archive 1

message: Do these weapons actually exist, or are they theoretical?  Do you have a reliable source that says Red Mercury is really Lithium-6? pstudier 20:25, 2005 July 10 (UTC)
Removed Lithium-6 is a component of fusion bombs that breaks into 2 tritium nuclides because it is not true.  The reaction is:
:n + 6Li → T + 4He
pstudier 20:32, 2005 July 10 (UTC)
I find this very speculative and totally unsourced. A google search for "ballotechnics" which restricts it to .edu and .gov sites turns up nothing related to nuclear weapons. Looks like red mercury nonsense to me. --Fastfission 23:39, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: As said the Russian TV, red mercury is a substance developed for anti-radar stealth-like technology and has no connection with the nuclesr fusion.
:Please sign your posts on talk pages, Nixer. Andrewa 20:30, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a better reference? What is it that it can be used for stealth? Is Russian TV another move in the disinformation game? GangofOne 06:08, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a film that was created specially to disclose the mystery of Red Mercury. Many people gave interview and showed the pieces of the substance. Nearly all physicists and military specialists said it was developed for stealth-like technology. Only some UFOlogists did put forward other fantastic versions.--Nixer 23:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red mercury 

message: I don't see any justification for speedy deletion at all. As for normal deletion, I have seen this discussed in other places.  So even though I don't believe it, I think it merits an article and the category listing pseudoscience. pstudier 04:43, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not a speedy, but the article is a mess and needs a rewrite the 'speculative tense' (as it were). DV8 2XL 04:54, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: I merged the text from these two articles here. Three entries on such a disputable topic is not necessary. DV8 2XL 05:02, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged material from Hafnium bomb and Quantum nucleonic reactor 

message: "The authenticity of this article has been questioned.
It is believed that some or all of its content might constitute a hoax" tag applied by dv8 2xl, Jan 21 06
Are you trying to highlight the idea that the subject of the article is a possible hoax, or that this wikipedia article about the subject is a hoax? I believe this is a serious article about a hoax subject, but the tag seems to say this a hoax article. Or is there some of each case in the article? Please make clear your intended meaning. GangofOne 21:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the topic is a hoax and Samuel Cohen is a fraud. If you know of a better tag for that, please feel free to replace mine. --DV8 2XL 21:22, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Pulled it. Tags are for warning users, if it's confusing it's not doing its job. --DV8 2XL 23:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  hoax 

message: The first paragraph mentions the isotope Platinum 186m but the article on Platinum only lists isotopes from 190 to 198.  Only Platinum 193, 195 and 197 are listed as being 'm' isotopes.
(see Nuclear isomer) tharkun860 03:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platinum-186m? 

message: besides this being bogus, what kind of nerd put "as of 2005 AD" in there? sorry, no mean to throw insults, but do we really need to say "AD"? 68.35.201.102 00:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AD? come on