Talk:Miguel Serrano

message: This article is in need of citations and also revisions.  As it stands, it seems almost like a PR piece for this guy.  Further, claims that this SELF-PROFESSED NAZI met with and befriended, among others, Herman Hesse (opposed to nazism), Carl Jung, Nehru, Indira Gandhi, and the Dalai Lama, cannot be believed, at least without citations.  I find it nearly impossible believe that the Dalai Lama would have met with this man and befriended him, especially when he had many more pressing concerns at the time; if he did, I would like to know what exactly was involved in this "friendship".  Jung and Hesse I can accept as he seems to have written a book with/about them; however, I would greatly appreciate a clarification as to the nature of their friendship, especially a clarification as to how Hesse fell in with this guy (Jung, I believe, may have had Nazi sympathies, so I don't have as many problems with their association).  The others need some references. Stonehouse 20:54, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Serrano describes his association with the Dalai Lama (as well as Nehru, Indira Gandhi, Jung and Hesse) in this interview (second question).  A photo of the two (taken in 1992) can be seen here.  Citation could also be made to page 177 of Goodrick-Clarke's Black Sun.  Serrano gives his reflections on Hesse's association to anti-Nazism in his introduction to C.G. Jung and Hermann Hesse. —Morning star 02:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I was comparing the claims made here about Jung's view on Hitler with the Jung article. I don't think they're compatible. The linked interview with Serrano says "C. G. Jung compared Adolf Hitler with Mohammed in an interview given before the war." If anyone has a reference to the interview (if it exists), rather than to Serrano's statement about it, that would be informative. (FWIW, I think anyone who believes what Serrano professes to believe according to this article has a mind so open that all his wits have blown away... nonsense is nonsense.) --Alvestrand 20:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT BELIEVABLE CLAIMS; NEEDS CITATIONS 

message: In several interviews and articles of the interwar period Jung analyzed Hitler as "possessed" by the collective Aryan unconscious:
"Hitler is a spiritual vessel, a demi-divinity; even better, a myth. Mussolini is a man."
"Hitler seemed like the 'double' of a real person, as if Hitler the man might be hiding inside like an appendix, and deliberately so concealed in order not to disturb the mechanism ... You know you could never talk to this man; because there is nobody there ... It is not an individual; it is an entire nation."
"His voice is that of at least 78 million Germans. He must shout, even in private conversation ... The voice he hears is that of the collective unconscious of his race."
Source: C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters, edited by William McGuire and R.F.C. Hull (London: Thames and Hudson, 1978), pp. 91-93, 115-135, 136-40. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.149.176.173 (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  JUNG'S WORDS ON HITLER: SOURCE OF SERRANO'S SPECULATIONS 

message: I'm not particularly concerned about the claims Serrano has made about who were his friends.  What is more important is that, as Stonehouse says, this reads like a PR piece.  It is very sympathetic to Serrano and his beliefs, and it is not neutral by any stretch of the imagination.  Nor is there any indication that Serrano's ideas might be a bit out of the mainstream and that he might be considered a nutter by some; it might be considered that this makes the article straightforward reporting, but I think that there needs to be some balance, with the inclusion of critical opinions of his ideas. Iain1917 08:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would tend to agree that this article doesn't say it describes a belief that is nonsense (as I do about a lot of other articles on wikipedia). However, just stating my opinion would be bad WP:OR - if someone finds a reference for a critique of Serrano, we can incorporate stuff stated there as WP:V verifiable statements, but just stating what's obvious to me isn't the Right Thing. --Alvestrand 15:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: This ist a piece of propaganda for a writer, whose opinions would be regarded as extremely bizarre even by most right-wing people, let alone the rest of potential readers. --84.150.243.150 15:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I have read the article about this Serrano and all I can tell that is a complete nonsense, a delirium of some senile negacionist fascist. In some points is laughable rather than delirious and offensive. Wikipidea should not have such long articles on such ridiculous characters, a couple of paragraphs are enough. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fpenteado (talk • contribs) 16:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  COMPLETE NONSENSE 

message: WP:TPG: "Editing others' comments (except on your own user talk page) is generally not allowed." --GirasoleDE 16:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reminder 

message: I deleted some of the intro today and it's been restored. I don't want to start a revert war, but I don't think it belongs there. This section describes Hitler as lord of the world, etc. and I think it should be more explicit that these are Serrano's beliefs and not Wikipedia's. Makerowner 05:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Serrano's beliefs certainly are strange and repulsive, but the introductory section is essentially accurate.  I think it makes clear that those ideas are his own.  The policy is pretty cut and dry in this area - just describe what the person thinks, even if it is nuts.  The section could be rewritten a bit for tone, but the information ought to remain.  See: WP:NPOV, especially here and here Bartleby 06:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: There is no sourcing in this article. Nothing. If that is not fixed, the article could be nominated for deletion. Kwork 17:22, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are multiple references cited, the article just lacks inline citations.  I've altered your tag to reflect that. Bartleby 18:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

text: If there are no sources indicated in the text of the article, and if there are no page references, there is no sourcing. A list of books at the bottom of the article is not sourcing. If that is not changed soon, indicating good intentions, I will restore my tag. Moreover, anything not sourced can be deleted from the article at any time.  Kwork 18:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to have an axe to grind with this article.  Your interpretation of citation policy is completely incorrect.  Please review WP:REF and policy on red links at WP:RED.  Also look at WP:EL regarding external links: you deleted a link to his homepage and a link to two texts of his not available in any other form.  I am reverting all your edits.  Please discuss any further changes on talk first.  For example, if you explain if there are passages you consider incorrect or controversial, I will attempt to specifically cite them as best I can. Bartleby 21:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing

message: From Henry Corbin, Spiritual Body and Celestial Earth (trans. Nancy Pearson, Princeton University Press, 1989, pps. 71-72).
"...That is why the progression, which this mode of thought makes it possible for us to conceive, is not a horizontal linear evolution, but an ascent from cycle to cycle, from one octave to a higher octave. A few pages from the same Shaikh, which have been translated here, illustrate this. The spiritual history of humanity since Adam is the cycle of prophecy following the cycle of cosmogony; but though the former follows in the train of the latter, it is in the nature of a reversion, a return and reascent to the pleroma. This has a gnostic flavor to be sure, but that is exactly what it means to 'see things in Hurqalya.' It means to see man and his world essentially in a vertical direction. The Orient-origin, which orients and magnetizes the return and reascent, is the celestial pole, the cosmic North, the 'emerald rock' at the summit of the cosmic mountain of Qaf, in the very place where the world of Hurqalya begins; so it is not a region situated East on the maps, not even those old maps that place the East at the top, in place of the North. The meaning of man and the meaning of his world are conferred upon them by this polar dimension, and not by a linear, horizontal and one-dimensional evolution, that famous 'sense of history' which nowadays has been taken for granted, even though the terms of reference on which it is based remain entirely hypothetical.
Moreover, the paradise of Yima in which are preserved the most beautiful of beings who will repopulate a transfigured world, namely, the Var that preserves the seed of the resurrection bodies, is situated in the North. The Earth of Light, the Terra Lucida of Manicheism, like that of Mazdeism [Zoroastrianism], is also situated in the direction of the cosmic North. In the same way, according to the mystic Abd al-Karim Jili, the 'earth of the souls' is a region in the far North, the only one not to have been affected by the consequences of the fall of Adam. It is the abode of the 'men of the Invisible,' ruled by the mysterious prophet Khizr (Khadir). A characteristic feature is that its light is that of the 'midnight sun,' since the evening prayer is unknown there, dawn rising before the sun has set. And here it might be useful to look at all the symbols that converge toward the paradise of the North, the souls' Earth of Light and castle of the Grail...."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.10.2 (talk) 18:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Irano-Hyperborean Gnosis

message: The page has now been ruined thanks to the efforts of formalistic anal-retentive editorship. Every single fact on the page was taken straight from Nicholas Goodricke-Clarke (Black Sun) and Joscelyn Godwin (Arktos). Any real-life editor would see the obvious in this instance, and would not maniacally and pathologically delete all of the valuable, rare information simply because it has not been anal-retentively, psychocompulsively referenced in perfect anal-retentive wikipedia style. The old page should be restored immediately; every single fact can be legitimately sourced to the discussions of Goodricke Clarke and Joscelyn Godwin on Serrano.
:The old page violated numerous Wikipedia policies, most obviously WP:NPOV. This page was taken from another page, as it is sourced and largely meets Wikipedia guidelines. If you want to add to the page or make changes, please feel free to do so but the previous page was simply unacceptable per Wikipedia guidelines. :bloodofox: (talk) 07:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Insofar as I have checked this material, I can confirm that the old page was based on Goodrick-Clarke and Godwin. It would have been helpful if it had been sourced with in-line citations and written up in a neutral style. I think I can improve it and work it back in. After that, we should move some of this stuff back to Esoteric Nazism. Serrano is a central figure there and deserves more than the tiny summary that now remains. Gnostrat (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the current state of the article is pretty miserable, though still an improvement over the previous article that existed. I support your idea and I think you're right. :bloodofox: (talk) 01:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put back part of the original article, sourced it more comprehensively (it's nearly all Goodrick-Clarke), made a few corrections and expansions, and removed a few peacock terms; but on the whole, this bit was well-written and I've only needed to intervene with a light hand. There are some changes I might still want to make to the way Gnosticism is represented in this article. This seems to be a problem not so much with Serrano's understanding of Gnosticism, as with Goodrick-Clarke's. I may have more to say about this later. Other than that, I hope the restored section is more or less up to standard now. The second part will be more of a challenge! Anyway I've moved the replacement material back to Esoteric Nazism. Gnostrat (talk) 03:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page is now Ruined, must be restored

message: http://www.dagobertsrevenge.com/bookstore/arktos.html
Next Godwin examines Migeul Serrano´s El Ultimo Avatara. He too believes in a spiritual magick war between the Hews and the Aryans, whom he calls the “Hyperboreans.” In the Golden Age, prior to the disaster that wiped out their civilization, the Hyperboreans, unlike the Hebrews, have made it their goal in life to escape Samsara, tat involuntary trap of never-ending reincarnation in Buddhist and Hindu belief. They “commanded the power of the Vril and possessed the Third Eye... while through their veins coursed the light of the Black Sun. It was their great advanture to incarnate for the purpose of combating the mechanical universe of the Demiurge”, the Jewish god whom they despised. Of particular importance to Grail researchers, Serrano wrote, “There is nothing more mysterious than blood. Paraclesus considered it a condensation of light. I believe that the Aryan, Hyperborean blood is that - but not the light of the Golden Sun, not the light of the galactic sun, but of the light of the Black Sun of the Green Ray. Serrano believed that the Templar Knights had “discovered the Hyperborean tradition for themselves and had broken with their Judeo-Christian roots, an event celebrated by their rupture from the Priory of Sion.” This tradition was also known by The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, “but Serrano says that it was perverted by the degeneracy of Aleister Crowley and the Hewish Bergsons.”  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.166.48.146 (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read Godwin's book and will cite it when I restore the deleted final section of the article. I'm in the process of rewriting it now. Gnostrat (talk) 01:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dagobert's Revenge Review on Serrano

message: Sumathi Ramaswamy, The Lost Land of Lemuria (University of California Press, 2004), p. 68: Indeed, Theosophy generates a complex geography of human races in which all the black peoples of the world are either Lemurians or their degenerate descendents, while the most advanced peoples of today--white Caucasians--are members of the fifth Root-race, far removed from them (77). In the Theosophical evolutionism, as Spirit--or Monad or Pilgrim--works its way through the history of the earth, it "is compelled to incarnate in, or rather contact, every race" (78). As it marches across the history of the earth, Spirit manifests itself in the form of the various Root-races and sub-races which it successively sheds as it surges upward toward our present Fifth Race, the most perfect so far. Those who get left behind--referred to variously as "sluggards" and "failures"--are destined to stagnate. Arguably, this enchanted evolutionary vision is much more racist and hierarchical than that espoused by many a contemporary disenchanted materialist, for millions of years separate the white Anglo-Saxon from the black aborigine whose origins are ascribed to the "racial decay" that besets the seventh sub-race in the closing years of Lemuria's life on earth (79). Further, rather than emerging from the more perfected forms of the Fourth Root-race on Atlantis, as the majority of northern humanity do, the blacks of the world--"fallen, degraded semblances of humanity"--are deemed to be descendents of a Root-race that was ultimately transcended by other, superior forms (80). Lemuria is handy in this regard as well, allowing the Theosophist to not only place the lower, degraded specimens of humanity in a different time, but also to isolate them further from the more evolved races by tracing their origins to a totally different continental configuration (81).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.136.1.133 (talk) 07:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Blavatskian-Theosophic Racialism

message: The former material on Serrano's strange personal Aryo-Hyperborean mytho-philosophy was not concocted out of thin air. Diverse, independent scholars confirm the same thing:
http://www.greylodge.org/occultreview/glor_006/invisible.htm
The former material should be restored somehow. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.163.77.165 (talk) 22:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification of Serrano's Racialist Mythopoeia

message: I keep getting sidetracked on various articles but I've put back the larger part of the section summarising Serrano's ideas which I've rewritten, I hope, in a neutral enough style and with adequate citations. I haven't been able to come up with a reference for the first sentence so maybe somebody else can fill that in. It really was tempting to leave some unintentionally hilarious passages untouched. ("The Hyperboreans were super-sexual and reproduced through spiritual projections", indeed.) Oh well, safer to go with the evident meaning of the source (i.e. the Hyperboreans were asexual and reproduced by emitting something like ectoplasm). I'll restore the remainder of the section soon. Gnostrat (talk) 02:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoration of 'mytho-philosophy' section

message: One of the worst problems of this page is the amount of space given to discussing the mythology Serrano promotes in his later Hitler trilogy. The works translated into English during his middle period, e.g. Visits of the Queen of Sheba, The Serpent of Paradise, The Ultimate Flower etc. deserve at least as much exposition as the later works, and arguably hold the key to how literally the claims of the Hitler trilogy should be taken. They also explain much better the otherwise puzzling friendships he sustained with some of the most gifted individuals of the day. Could someone (preferably not a neo-nazi) who has read them provide some sort of precis of their content? 129.67.17.233 (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive concentration on Serrano's later mythology 

message: ...or a hoax? This stuff seems too bizarre to be really believed. Is Serrano a hoaxer? Vultur (talk) 18:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid it's quite real. His biography and his ideas are all reliably referenced, and my impression is that he seriously believed his own claims. Wikipedia doesn't, of course, adjudicate on whether or not he was seriously self-deluded. We just record. Gnostrat (talk) 21:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this actually real...

message: "Afraid"... Please, Sir. Your services in making the article "scholastically acceptable" according to the Wikipedia editorial masses are sincerely appreciated, but condescending attitudinizing is out of place. Have any of you even tried to understand Serrano?
Karl Marx, if analyzed in all seriousness, is equally insane, if Serrano is deemed insane. Social conformist popularity is irrelevant. I personally agree Serrano succumbs to many, and probably morally irresponsible, intellectual errors, but he was no lunatic, and indeed no worse, in terms of psycho-pathology, clinically, than the numerous battalions of fashionably popular Leftist icons so sweetly and stealthily positively characterized here on the New Soviet Encyclopedia, I mean, Wikipedia...
I don't defend Serrano. I am trying to EXPLAIN Serrano. First thing, is understanding he was an authentic ESOTERIC of rare, suppressed occult traditions in the West. All his comments relating to Hitler, Hyperborea, Thule, etc., are subtly SYMBOLIC and not dead-letter schizophrenia. I am describing his world-view not defending his world-view.
Judgmental moralist critique is just irrelevant. Just document and honestly characterize without double-standards. 
I personally believe the excesses of Communist tyranny at least possibly RIVAL those of NS tyranny. I don't like partisanship either way, no matter how unpopular among the literati and cultured "set" I thus become for striving for balance...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.52.186.148 (talk) 03:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes Real and Not Insane 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Miguel Serrano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160406160032/http://uzonreport.com/?p=2458 to http://uzonreport.com/?p=2458
*Added  tag to http://www.lanuevaedadrevista.blogspot.com.ar/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Miguel Serrano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020215233816/http://www.letras.s5.com/archivoserrano.htm to http://www.letras.s5.com/archivoserrano.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000818012656/http://www.stelling.nl/simpos/savitri_devi.htm to http://www.stelling.nl/simpos/savitri_devi.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040817001536/http://feastofhateandfear.com/archives/serrano1.html to http://feastofhateandfear.com/archives/serrano1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050310200847/http://www.feastofhateandfear.com/archives/serrano2.html to http://feastofhateandfear.com/archives/serrano2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified