lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dry Tortugas

message: Seems like they should be merged.  But which one should go, and which should stay?  -   Marc Averette 22:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be merged with [[Dry Tortugas National Park]]? 

message: This article would greatly benefit from a locator map, showing the position of the subject with respect to the coastline of the mainland. -- Beland 20:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: done, after less than 3 years :-) --Ratzer (talk) 12:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map request 

message: The article states that the "Dry" part of the name was added soon after the original naming, however this doesn't seem right, due to the mix of english and spanish - if it was indeed soon after, it probably would now be "Tortugas Secas" (the spanish equivalent). Does anyone know when the islands changed from "Las Tortugas" to "Dry Tortugas"? And who was it that changed the name? --Ozhiker 23:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name details 

message: In the section about Iowa Rock, it says a navigational light was destroyed there by Hurricane Hugo. This is impossible as the only Hurricane Hugo never even got to the Bahamas, much less the Dry Tortugas. Perhaps it was Hurricane Andrew. -- HurricaneERIC - Class of '08: XVII Maius MMVIII 21:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hugo 

message: How about mentioning it.  and maybe location. 
24 degrees 31.5 feet North Latitude and 82 degrees 20 feet West Longitude  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericg33 (talk • contribs) 05:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atocha treasure 

message: _____> the page linked to is dead deisenbe (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Dry Tortugas and Dry Tortugas National Park contain so much duplication, covering the same things, that I propose they be merged. I think the National Park should be the one to stay. deisenbe (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Support There's substantial duplication and overlap, but also differences that may be on one article even as it's relevant to both, which does a disservice to the reader. I don't care which title stays, but they are not so long that it wouldn't be feasible. History of the park before it became a park, the geology, and geography are all still pertinent to the park and needn't be described separately, just as the park's ecology and park-era history are all pertinent to the islands since they're the exact same place. Reywas92Talk 21:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Live! at the Star-Club in Hamburg, Germany; 1962

message: If you look at the book report on the talk page of The Beatles Wikipedia book, you will see that it says this article does not exist, but when you go to the book page and select it it will take you to the article. Given how the book report sees the article as nonexistent, I don't know if it'll show up in the printed book or downloaded book copy. I myself had problems generating both of these, but it could just be my computer. Could any of this trouble have anything to do with the somewhat unusual punctuation used in the article title?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveman16 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with this article in The Beatles Wikipedia book

message: This article should be put up for a GA review.--andreasegde (talk) 17:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a fine article, but I think it should make clear that Harrison appeared in court in person to stop the 1998 re-release; this generated a lot of publicity at the time but it's not really touched upon here. That should be expanded.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added another sentence about Harrison's role. - Mainstream Nerd (talk) 00:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA
Talk:Meet the Fockers

message: I heard that there would be a sequel to "Meet the Fockers" called "Meet the Little Focker". Is it true? Bubble bunny
Is there somewhere that we can write to prevent this from happening?
Ttenchantr 06:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Old but LOL. 77.97.224.17 (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Meet the Little Focker

message: The whole article seems written up by the film publicist. 
There is no objective POV. There is a need for extensive re-writes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.216.191.105 (talk) 01:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article feels like a promo 

message: This is my first time editing any article with anything more than correcting puncuation or changing syntax and word flow. So, any suggestions for improvement are welcome, or even discussion on how I could have improved it. Soulnebula 06:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Meet the Fuckers is a series of pornographic movies. it shouldn't redirect to Meet the Fockers.Fegor (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meet the Fuckers
Talk:List of defunct NFL franchises

message: I have not seen a single article on a defunct team that should be an article. I think it would make more sense to move all text here. If it ever happens that a team's paragraph gets big, then it might be moved to a separate article. --MarSch 14:50, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: merge the lot

message: Readding Cleveland Browns as the team was effectively defunct for that time period. --Duemellon 20:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Browns are considered by the league to have "suspended operations" in 1997-98, not "defunct". See Talk:Baltimore Ravens. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also note that this article says, "Note that the purpose of the list is for NFL teams that no longer exist" (emphasis added). Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

text: What makes it a defunct team? Continuity in what manner? Ownership? Uniforms? City? Nickname? continual seasons of play? Is it the shared historical data?  The "defunct" label seems a bit unclear in those regards. Could you (whoever) clarify it in this article? --Duemellon 16:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Re-issuing the request: Please define "defunct" teams & why one is defunct while others aren't? --Duemellon 12:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

text: In an attempt to simplify what you are saying (as that's a whole heap of unsegmented sentences), if the team had given the rights to the team back to the league, it was defunct for that period of time. Is that the credentials for a defunct team? --Duemellon 11:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Why wait so long? It's just that some things aren't really that important. I do suggest you include that definition, in clear terms, in this article. "Defunct" is a general term & could be interpretted many ways without that point of clarificaiton --Duemellon 17:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleveland Browns 

message: I am removing Frankford Yellow Jackets because they moved to become the Eagles. --Alien joe (talk) 23:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frankford 
Talk:Arab philosophy

message: Averroës can be considered an Arabic philosopher, but Avicenna was Persian.  This article looks like it wants to be Islamic philosophy.  That, and the fact that this isn't really NPOV (it's a contested interpretation of Platonism in Chistendom, even if I do share it), incline me to delete the content and redirect.  Assuming that there is no objection.
: A redirect seems sensible. Dast 12:47, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect?
Talk:Myron Cope

message: The Towel was a response to Dolphin and Raider fan practice. They waved white handkerchiefs and black socks, respectively.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 02:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrible Towel
Talk:Doreen Chanter

message: My source suggests (as I wrote in the Chanter Sisters article) that the family act had two U.K. Top 40 hits, with Every Night (I Sit And Cry) reaching number 17 in November of 1966, and You Can't Fool Me topping out at number 39 in March of 1967. 
Field's Fab Forty for Sunday 12th March 1967. This information needs to be reconciled. -- BD2412 talk 15:14, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
:According to the Guinness Book of British Hit Singles & Albums - , the Chanter Sisters had just one entry in the UK Singles Chart - "Sideshow" in July 1976. It peaked at #43. The Chanter Sisters article has been referenced accordingly.  Thanks,
:
:Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 4 singles which failed to chart?

message: In June 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was to keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Doreen Chanter for a record of the discussion. — Trilobite (Talk) 14:47, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion
Talk:Advanced Extension Award

message: Should an 'N.B.' be added to explain that even though the award is aimed at the top 10% of students, not all the top 10% of students take the exam as many see it as an increased workload (Students and Teachers)that might affected their A Levels (as the AEA is very rarely if ever included in an offer for a university place) and in some colleges and sixth forms only those applying to Oxbridge are allowed to sit the exam.
:Sounds good to me. Be bold in updating pages! --rbrwr± 16:05, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to delete the "if ever" from "the AEA is very rarely if ever included in an offer for a university place" on the basis that I've just received an offer from Durham that asked for a merit in AEA Physics. Simxp 22:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Though I can see you'be cited the sources at the bottom of the article, could you place a citation next to the relavent fact, also note that some of your links are "dead links". DannyM 19:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 

message: Is there evidence that an AEA carries 40 points for Distinction and 20 for Merit? Or is something that someone agreed on with their university? Basically, has UCAS officially said this? I'm particularly interested because if it is true, then I am eligible for an excellence bursary.
Those are the official points values, , and it should also be noted that unlike other qualifications, a fail at AEA does not have to be declared on UCAS, and that most of the universities that AEA candidates apply for are unlikely to make point-based offers anyway, and instead just offer on specific grades  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.242.70 (talk) 11:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCAS points 

message: Almost all of this is years out of date. A near-obsolete article in this form which needs a complete overhaul.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.85.216 (talk) 18:46, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete 
Talk:Jake 2.0

message: I nominate this page for deletion
:...on... what grounds...? Zeppocity 22:21, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Early in the article says: "leaving four episodes unaired in the United States." while later in the article says: "There are also four unaired episodes." Are those four episodes unaired EVERYWHERE or just unaired in the US? If they did air elsewhere, much like the final episodes of the US series Threshold, then perhaps they could be added to the episode list.
I am not sure, but I thought it was the last 4 in that list, and not only that, they were aired in the UK on Sky One. Govvy 12:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  unaired? 

message: Should probably add short bios of the major characters so the plots make more sense. RJFJR 04:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: I just removed a very long-standing copyright violation of this page that was introduced by User:Inter net in February 2006. There is no obvious permission given for this reproduction. I can write up some new summaries, but I've only seen up to episode 7, so it may be a day or two before I can get them all typed. Sarrandúin [ Talk + Contribs ] 23:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My summaries for episodes 1-11, 13, & 14 are up. I haven't seen the latter two yet, and not enough of 12 to write anything reasonable, so it might be a bit before they're up (unless someone else chooses to do them). The stupid thing cost me more time than was probably necessary, though, since I decided to change what I had written from something resembling what was originally up, to a list-hybrid, to a nice-looking but complicated table written from scratch, to finally converting the whole thing to use the "Episode list" template, as that format is much easier on the common-editor's eyes. Only problem is the spoiler template is misplaced now (though I do suppose it gives you more warning like that, haha). Sarrandúin [ Talk + Contribs ] 03:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: whats with the "TBM"?????  XU-engineer 23:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TBM??

message: You might want to mention that the recently released DVDs by VEI have the original music changed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.227.108 (talk) 18:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: DVDs
Talk:Tarim mummies

message: It seems weird that this article is using the population classification preferred by phrenologists.
AlleyRegent69 (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: the problem is that it's not just phrenologists who use the term Caucasian, read the article, and we can only represent the sources.  Doug Weller talk 08:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Caucasoid is a better term, used in plenty of the source material. It's also less ambiguous, since Caucasian often literally mean "from the Caucasus area".  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:42, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Caucasian

message: *  – This source is already in the article but has barely been touched.
*  – Ditto.
*  – As with everything at NYT, you can defeat their paywall by doing a very quick select-all and copy before the paywall's overlay pops up, then paste the text into some other app and read it there.
* 
* 
*  – Lame title, but this is one of the pieces that gets into the modern politics, and our article needs to cover that better.
*  – Ditto.
*  – A rather substantial article.
* 
* 
* 
* 
*  2 vols. – Expensive academic work (US$165 list price, and not found on Amazon, etc.), best gotten through inter-library loan.
*  – Ditto; about US$80 on Amazon right now.
* 
* 
Can't particularly vouch for all source quality; I'm just running across mostly-secondary material and pasting the citation deets for it here.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  01:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some more sources 

message: I raise issues with the part where it states that the mummies had 'typical caucasian' feature and then states (tall stature, high cheekbones, deep-set eyes). I don't mean to state the obvious but should be mentioned many white people are not tall, nor is tallness a whites only trait. And also Eurasians, East Asians and Africans also can have deep set eyes so it's not exactly a trait belonging to Caucasians only. When you write that these are typical features of Caucasians, it's both inaccurate and wrong at multiple levels as other races have those too. However the mummies were described as having a so-called Western physical appearance. And such a facial style is actually typical of Caucasians and so that should stay. So made the changes. 49.180.125.162 (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caucasian typical traits? Is tallness exclusive only to whites?
Talk:Stroud High School

message: There have now been over twenty edits to be text of this entry since the warning box was added in November 2010 regarding it potentially being an advertisement. Many of these edits, but not all have been in response. I have just been through the text again and believe all the content is now factual and neutral. It is true that there is still some repetition, but I believe that everything that could be considered to constitute an advertisement has been removed. Is there any objection therefore to removing the warning box and if there is, could the objector outline the area(s) that offend this rule. (Christoryland (talk) 21:12, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Howard Hanson

message: Greetings,
I have created a disambiguation page for A Sea Symphony. Ideally, that page should bring the general title A Sea Symphony that is now given to Vaughan Williams' first symphony. However, until an article dedicated to Hanson's 7th is written, people seem against this move. Would somebody write something about H.H. 7th?
Thanks in advance. --Mahlerite (talk) 12:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I have created a stub. If somebody could expand it... Thanks in advance. --Mahlerite (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Removed link. DAB page unneeded, Vaughan Williams article has appropriate hatnote. — Timneu22 ·  talk 13:56, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Sea Symphony 

message: An editor has written in the article that Howard Hanson did not study under Respighi - which contradicts the New Grove article which normally would be treated as a reputable source. I'm not sure how information allegedly taken from an unpublished autobiography and which may well be true should be treated here. If I find a more definite *published* source which confirms either way, I will incorporate this in the article with relevant citation - but hope maybe another editor might do the same. Alfietucker (talk) 12:24, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems there is an unpublished autobiography, in the care of John C Brzustowicz (see here and here). Still, I'm wary of treating this - unseen and unpublished - as authoritative when there's this from Howard Hanson in Theory and Practice by Allen Laurence Cohen, which suggests a direct claim by Hanson about his studies with Respighi. Any other thoughts? Alfietucker (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hello fellow Wikipedians - Based upon the published source Howard Hanson in Theory and Practic cited above I have included text in the article indicating that Howard Hanson sought advice from Respighi and was influenced by his work while in Rome (even though he may not have pursued formal studies with him). I hope this helps to clarify matters somewhat and is OK. Thanks for the help. With best regards 104.207.219.150 (talk) 23:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Respighi 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians - After including additional citations and references I have removed these two templates: More footnotes|date=November 2015 and  refimprove section|date=November 2015  I hope that this is OK. Any Thoughts? Many thanks for your kind assistance. Respectfully 104.207.219.150 (talk) 20:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Included new citations and removed templates 

message: An anon editor is messing up the formatting of this page, replacing bold and italicized text with plain quote marks.  I've tried reaching out to the editor and have not gotten any response.  Can we protect this page so only registered editors can change it?MisterCSharp (talk) 18:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting
Talk:Bates (Stargate)

message: Before I move it... why is the spoiler notice after the events of "Rising"? Shouldn't the events of "Rising" be considered spoiler information as well?  Just curious... --Joe Beaudoin Jr. 16:36, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Peter A Barnard

message: :Do Not Delete
:Harmless school-kid fun, hes the kind of guy who wouldn't mind anyway. Game for a laugh.
:Osiris
*Osiris, that's not the point. Even if Mr. Barnard does not mind, Wikipedia is not the place for school-kid fun. If you want to start your own wiki to play around, you can create one at Wikicities. jglc | t | c 19:48, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Jože Plečnik

message: — Assignment last updated by Rhennings2 (talk) 23:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Architectural History
Talk:Research Triangle

message: I think we should separate Durham-Chapel Hill, NC MSA and Raleigh-Cary, NC MSA from the article on the CSA. I was trying to work out what communities are part of the Durham-Chapel Hill MSA and it is impossible to do so from the combined article. Looking around at other metro areas, some have separate entries for MSAs and the CSA, some don't. The two MSAs do have separate identities, and it would be useful to have articles reflecting that. — Protoblast (talk) 16:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to partially undo the merger
Category talk:Mega Man games

message: I notice that it's location hasn't been very stable, so I'll explain my reasoning of moving the :Category:Capcom games back to this category (:Category:Mega Man games) from :Category:Mega Man. The Capcom games category deals directly and exclusively with games, not the rest of the franchise.  Although the rest of the data at the Mega Man category level is relevant to the games, they aren't the games, which is what Capcom games category is for. --TheDotGamer Talk 17:06, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
:I suggest if this kind of thing is important to you that you also hadle the inconsistency in the Devil May Cry articles concerning it. --Boco XLVII 21:18, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Capcom games
Talk:Saltcoats

message: This article is not neutral.
Explain WHY it is not neutral? Douglasnicol 21:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Sorry to disagree, but I believe that salt production came from saltpans and not salt salt mining.
::That might be correct, I didn't put in the mining Douglasnicol 14:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name
Talk:Graduate Institute of International Studies

message: This prose reads like advertising copy. It does not even assume the semblance of objective consideration of the institute's mission or history. A brief comparison to any Wikipedia entry of the institute's peers will make this readily apparent.
69.209.78.251 (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This is not an encyclopedia article
Talk:GWR 3252 Class

message: For disambig purposes, would anyone know if the Jupiter locomotive is named after the Planet Jupiter or the Roman God? -- BD2412 talk 17:20, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
Why no dates?  Here or on the dukedog page?  Brunnian 16:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Early queries

message: Is there any reason why the photograph on Wikimedia Commons isn't included here? It immediately explains what is meant by the Duke class's "curved frame" in the GWR 3200 Class article.  --Rfsmit (talk) 11:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph
Talk:GWR 3300 Class

message: I wish some 3300 engines were preserved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.1.117.60 (talk) 16:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 5.4 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for discussion on how to improve the GWR 3300 Class article. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I wish some 3300 class engines were preserved.