lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Instantnood 3/Proposed decision

message: Fred updated this page this morning with his proposals.  They never showed up on Workshop where interested parties could comment.  So, I'm commenting here.  I don't think this proposed decision is helpful.  It's a cut and paste job from the last decision and just as vague and non-prescriptive.  This Instantnood3 case came about because the previous remedies and when they should come into play were being ignored by admins, and wiki-lawyered by the parties.  These new remedies, though more punitive, will suffer from the same problem.  They thus fail to address the issue of why this case even exists.
The decision and remedies need to be prescriptive to admins if the ArbCom thinks any admin is going to act on them.  Admins aren't poring over the minutae of ArbCom decisions and aren't going to be familiar with the participants, the principles, or findings of fact.  These vague descriptive remedies for "inappropriate editing" and "admin discretion" don't work because admins don't KNOW what inappropriate editing is without reading the ArbCom case, which they don't do. And their discretion ends up as doing nothing because it's easier to just move along to another incident and block an obvious troll than read the arbcom case, investigate the situation, and then try and second guess what ArbCom intends them to do.
I didn't know if I was out of line to do so, but I put proposed remedies on the Workshop page that I think addressed the specific principles and user behaviors at issue here. I only did this a few hours earlier than Fred put this proposal here and think they deserve some discussion before a rushed decision is made. SchmuckyTheCat 17:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Update by Fred Bauder
Talk:Simple and Clean

message: :Does this post have a point...?—urutapu 23:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: point

message: This article should be merged with the COLORS article. There are no other articles for B-tracks on Wikipedia that I know of. Yes, this is a popular song but it's a B-side and the main single, so it should be added to the colors article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.199.100.155 (talk) 19:09, August 24, 2007 (UTC) 
:Agreed. Despite its popularity, it is merely a B-side to COLORS. Though I'm not sure about Sanctuary, since it hasn't been officially released as part of any CD, not even the Kingdom Hearts II soundtrack, perhaps merge it with Passion? Andrew Eng 23:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:2006 Memorial Cup

message: So as not to contravene WP:3RR I raise this question here - the Petes finished third in the round-robin by goal difference. Should they not be listed in third in round-robin standings in spite of losing to the Giants in the tie-breaker? I believe that officially the standings remain the same although obviously the Giants advanced. See also 2002 Memorial Cup, where the Tigres finished fourth but won the tie-breaker. BoojiBoy 00:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The tie-breaker is a tie-breaker, not a playoff game. I'd say put Peterborough in last, but that's my two cents worth. -- Earl Andrew - talk 02:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Goal differential only decides who has home ice.  The only tie breaker in this scenario is the tie-breaker game itself.  I would list Vancouver in third, Peterborough in fourth.  Resolute 04:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, thinking more on it, the CHL treats the tiebreaker as a playoff game, not part of the round robin. Its pretty much the equivalent of the NCAA buy-in game.  It is kinda on both sides of the fence.  I think I'd lean more towards sticking with the format used in 2002, and listing the tiebreaker as a playoff game. Resolute 04:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The point was that the rules are not clear. BoojiBoy 16:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added an italicized note to the round-robin section. Does that work for everyone? BoojiBoy 20:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: "Even if the Remparts lose and fall to a 1-2 record with the Giants and Petes, they'd remain the second-seeded team under a tiebreaking formula in which the three teams' results against Moncton would be thrown out and the teams' goals for against each other would be divided by the sum of their goals for and goals against. So in the event of a three-way tie at 1-2, the Remparts' percentage would be .571, followed by Peterborough at .500 and Vancouver at .429." From . BoojiBoy 20:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is for a three-way tie however, not what did actually occur. Resolute 22:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the formula for tie-breaking is still the same. BoojiBoy 23:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Round Robin Standings
Talk:Legacy: A Mormon Journey

message: I know that this film is known as Legacy.  When I searched on IMDB, there were many films by that name.  When I found the correct film, it had an alternative title of Legacy: A Mormon Journey, so this is the title that I have used. I made a redirect for the "Legacy (movie)" article.  Val42 17:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of this article

message: The entire current description section is a straight copy/paste job from a July 1993 Ensign article titled  As such, I am removing it as a copyright violation. -- 63.224.135.113 (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Description
Talk:Juiced (book)

message: The second paragraph could certainly be expanded more. Anyone know of specific criticims? OsFan 17:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms of Book

message: Um...every single claim's source is the frickin book!  What a retarded thing to put.  If I wasn't so retarded I'd take it off myself.  Can you please? 71.65.240.196 00:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does not cite sources? 

message: In present form this article appears very neutral. The book is a POV; this article is simply an overview of its contents. I removed the POV flag.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.253.177.198 (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Questioned?
Talk:Nordwestdeutscher Rundfunk

message: During its decade of operation, the NWDR had a technical laboratory that, as I understand it, played a central role in establishing standards for all public German broadcasting, and was also responsible for inventing and fostering advanced audio, radio and television technology. As an example, Dr. Herbert Großkopf (head of the laboratory) designed and patented several important types of condenser microphone that were then licensed for manufacture by Neumann and Schoeps (although Schoeps then filed his own, superseding patents for improved versions of those same inventions). As I understand it, this laboratory was essentially transferred to the IRT when the NWDR was split up in 1956. I believe that this aspect of the NWDR merits inclusion in the article. DSatz (talk) 06:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topic for inclusion: NWDR's research laboratory 

message: especially the childrens programming by else vordemberge  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.36.71 (talk) 18:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  program info would be useful
Talk:SeaWorld

message: I want to delete SeaWorld of Ohio page because it has its own page and makes the article confusing.
The whole article needs to be organized better.
The language seems very negative towards SeaWorld, it is all biased towards the negative things.
Orca section only mentions the attacks/fatals events. (Swartsse (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: John Hargrove has indicated in videos on youtube that SW is/was breeding captive orcas from opposite parts of the world. He feels that the baby orcas are born without a social identity of their own, and since they do not belong to a pod, but are removed from their mothers to be trained by humans, that these orcas would face significant problems fitting in if they were released in the wild. He feels these are hybrid animals. This page could use an animal expert to address if this is a valid concern. 96.91.182.205 (talk) 14:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: John Hargrove is the former SW animal trainer who has spoken against their policies. 96.91.182.205 (talk) 14:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: John Hargrove nor his youtube videos are Reliable Sources.--VVikingTalkEdits 14:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes  

message: Right now the page states that SeaWorld stopped the orca breeding in 2016, in the USA, and will phase this off; but it mentions that in Abu Dhabi a
new park has opened? Could the article be made more clear? E. g. what's it now with the orcas, and what does Abu Dhabi have to do with that. That
leaves me puzzled. We ought to see that wikipedia is clear in all statements made. 2A02:8388:1641:8380:5B2A:1D48:E08B:27B6 (talk) 23:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear Page 

message: Is there a reason why SW's legal issues are hidden under the orca paragraphs?  This section admitted that the US government has fined SW for policies that are not safe for their employees and animals should be fair and balanced. Making it a paragraph on it's own indicates that there has been some wrong doing on their part, rather than the accusations just coming from social justice workers. 96.91.182.205 (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think making it a separate paragraph is reasonable. The current paragraph is too long anyway.  23impartial (talk) 02:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osha violation should be own paragraph
Talk:Crowsnest Pass, Alberta

message: There is the potential for confusion between this page (for the Municipality) and the page called Crowsnest Pass (the geographic area).  It may be best for this page to concentrate on the urban Municipality and leave the rest to the other page. Ian mckenzie 18:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this could go under in media, it is a song by the name of hillcrest mine. 2600:1702:9F0:D140:DCC7:2A2B:1BAE:DC10 (talk) 02:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  crowsnest pass song
Talk:Emperor Huan of Han

message: I believe the aforementioned events in the title were significant milestones in Chinese history and worth mentioning in the article.
Buddhism did change the cultural landscape of china greatly and played a central role in Chinese religious life until the Huichang Persecution of Buddhism. Even after that, Buddhism still plays a significant role. So introduction and early events related to the royal adaptation of Buddhism are worth mentioning.Lipwe (talk) 06:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction of Buddhism and being adopted as the official religion of the court of the Chinese emperor
Talk:Royal Canadian Armoured Corps

message: In 1936 several regiments were designated (Tank) regiments during the Militia-wide reorganizations.  They were still considered part of the infantry, however, hence my edit of the reference to the Windsor Regiment on 23 Feb 2006. Michael Dorosh 18:20, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Is the personnel branch, called Armour Branch in CFAOs, identical to or merely conflated with the RCAC? I see the two are often used interchangeably, even on CF sites, but what is the official branch name? SigPig 06:23, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RCAC vs Armour Branch

message: With the recent change of The Halifax Rifles (RCAC) from being on the inactive list to being stood up in cadre strength, a list of the inactive regiments of the corps should be posted and explained on the page lostmuskrat (talk) 02:27, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a list of these regiments at Supplementary Order of Battle, but I'm not sure it's 100% complete. This article should either have a link to Supplementary Order of Battle or include the list of SOB armoured regiments directly. Indefatigable (talk) 02:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  RCAC regiments that exist, but only on paper 
Talk:The Islamic Foundation

message: Mais oui!, you changed the cat from cat:Islam in the United Kingdom to cat:Islam in the England. I'm unsure why you did this. From other edits you've made, it seems you have a problem with the use of the term United Kingdom. Regardless of your political political agenda, cat:Islam in the United Kingdom is the correct category. On their official site, next to 'The Islamic Foundation' is the text 'United Kingdom'. Though based in Leicester, England, it is a UK wide organisation.Veej 18:22, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tennessee–Tombigbee Waterway

message: The "controversy" and "economic impact" sections seem to directly contradict each other, and the Troy University study showing $43 billion in impact seems pretty suspicious, especially given that Troy is in Alabama, one of the big winners from the canal construction project.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F140:400:A02C:2D36:CF1B:90A6:8100 (talk) 18:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias/Inconsistency

message: I've requested that this article be expanded. I know that there is a lot more history on the waterway, especially some controversy that the demand for it has not appeared. However, I don't know enough to write a whole section on it.
Also, if anyone has a map of the waterway, including the locks, and/or some pictures of the waterway and/or locks, the article would probably benefit. Clarkbhm 18:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion requests

message: I would suggest that the link to Divide cut be removed, and a new section entered with this title.  I will work on this, if there are no objections.  I will also work on taking some photos on the Divide cut and Bay Springs Lake, as these are the sections which I am quite familiar. mrh 22:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divide cut 
Talk:Abdur Rab Nishtar

message: This page is being renamed/moved to the correct spelling of Sardar Abdur Rab Nishtar.
Siddiqui 18:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: a complete profile is already available under the title of Sardar Abdur Rab Nishtar
I think a redirect link should instead be put.
Zak 21:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Prehistoric sites in England

message: I've created this category as I didn't think Archaeological sites in England was specific enough.  I've moved some articles from "Archaeological sites" -> "Prehistoric sites" already, and will do more as I have time.  I've made this a sub-category of "Archaeological sites", so articles are still there, just moved down a level.  One exception: I've left Stonehenge in both categories as I figure it's a high-traffic article that people might be expecting to find under "Archaeology".  Please respond here or on my talk page if you have objections. –Ryan McDaniel 18:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarification: Any articles which have both prehistoric and other archaeological significance (e.g., Roman use of a prehistoric hill fort), I'm double-listing. –Ryan McDaniel 06:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, as of 24 Feb 06. –Ryan McDaniel 20:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category creation

message: Should :Category:Iron Age Britain (or Bronze age or Stone age) be a parent? Generically (or rather conventionally) "Prehistory" is a parent to "Iron Age" (and Bronze age and Stone age) so this seems rather confusing. See also Talk:Carn Brea-- Ashley VH 12:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parent query
Talk:Chow

message: Can anyone provide references on this meaning, which seems odd to me:
:# A variant of Poo, a Japanese dog name
(Note that Poo goes to a dab page that doesn't provide anything about dog names, just their feces.)
Elf | Talk 18:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese dog name

message: are statistical test see Chow forecast and breakpoint tests
203.158.44.199 01:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chow tests

message: Hi wikipedians, 
Some people may have surname of Chow but in the translated Chinese character, Chow can be different. I have split the People section into various Notable people with surnamed Chow () section. If an article does not have the Chinese character, then, the person can be placed into the Notable people with surnamed Chow () section. 
Cheers! SWP13 (talk) 09:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allocated Chow surname into different section (Dec 2016)
Template talk:Swallows and Amazons

message: Would anyone object changing the template to this so that title names are not split between lines?
Swallows and AmazonsArthur Ransome                                                                                                                                                                                                         	Swallows and AmazonsArthur Ransome                                                                                                                                                                                                         	Swallows and AmazonsArthur Ransome
Swallows and Amazons | Swallowdale | Peter Duck | Winter Holiday | Coot Club | Pigeon Post </br> We Didn't Mean To Go To Sea|Secret Water | The Big Six | Missee Lee | The Picts And The Martyrs </br> Great Northern? | Coots in the North	Swallows and Amazons | Swallowdale | Peter Duck | Winter Holiday | Coot Club | Pigeon Post </br> We Didn't Mean To Go To Sea|Secret Water | The Big Six | Missee Lee | The Picts And The Martyrs </br> Great Northern? | Coots in the North	Swallows and Amazons | Swallowdale | Peter Duck | Winter Holiday | Coot Club | Pigeon Post </br> We Didn't Mean To Go To Sea|Secret Water | The Big Six | Missee Lee | The Picts And The Martyrs </br> Great Northern? | Coots in the North
Characters                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 	Places                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     	
Thanks. Suicidalhamster 18:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All the above comments are now out of date - :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Talk:CombiStick

message: It seems to me that pages like this one and the one for the Plasmacaster could safely be merged into the main Yautja entry. 204.69.40.7 18:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is information that could be put into a merged entry. There is no need for extra entries. 204.69.40.7 21:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Yep. Merge. Kafziel 19:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay... well, it's been over 5 months, so I've gone ahead and merged it. Kafziel 20:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sierpiński space

message: The current version of the article states that:
* If X is a topological space with topology T, then the weak topology on X generated by C(X,S) coincides with T.
Is this true? I would say it holds only for T_0-spaces. The 2-point indiscrete space could be a counterexample. --Kompik 18:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely for an indiscrete space (X,T), the weak topology on X generated by any set of continuous functions on X is still T, since the indiscrete topology is the weakest possible tolopogy on X. Martin Orr 21:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Weak topology

message: Someone changed "classifying space" to "classifying topos" throughout. A space is not a topos, so this is just false, as stated. It is the case that the topos of sheaves on the Sierpinski space is the classifying topos for global subobjects (called open sets by Artin and Grothendieck) in the category of toposes, but this is a very different statement (proved on page 117 of Johnstone's 1977 Topos Theory book) and is not what the proof in the "Continuous Functions on Sierpinski Space" section says. The linked article in the nLab also uses classifying space, not classifying topos, so the confusion seems to originate here, not there. I am going to change things back to "classifying space" and add a statement to that article explaining that one can also consider classifying spaces up to homeomorphism instead of up to homotopy, and link back to the relevant section of this article for the Sierpinski space example. Furby100 (talk) 08:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Classifying "topos"

message: The article, in the "Continuous functions to..." section, made the claim "In other words, the Sierpinski space is the subobject classifier of the category of topological spaces." But this is more than a rephrasing of the property that comes before it. A subobject classifier classifies every monomorphism into an object, but the Sierpinski space classifies only open sets, which are far from the only monomorphisms (or even the only subspaces) in the category of topological spaces. I have removed this line. ThrealAEV (talk) 01:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subobject classifier
Talk:Repco

message: I remember that my father Skil chainsaw had a Repco 2-stroke engine who knows more about it ? Ericd 19:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know these answers?
--PeterMarkSmith 05:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? Relationship to Repco Autoparts stores in ANZ? 

message: Is this the same company that has their name on bikes from K-Mart etc?Garrie 01:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bicycles? 

message: The engineering company Warren And Brown was part of Repco for MANY years. This needs to be added to the article Vk2tds (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Then add it. --Falcadore (talk) 01:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warren and Brown 

message: Repco were involved in the development of high speed yarn spinning technology, called SIROSPUN. This was world leading non-automotive technology, and needs to be added to the article. Vk2tds (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and add it in. Get your references and start writing. --Falcadore (talk) 01:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repco and Sirospun 

message: It was called Richmond engine parts company in 1922 101.165.234.3 (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Can find no confirmation for this assertion. "Replacement Parts Company" is well attested. Doug butler (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong
Talk:Li'l Abner (1959 film)

message: It is pointed out that Edie Adam's played the role on Broadway.  Elsewhere on Wikipedia, it's explained that Edie Adams' baby was late being born, so Leslie Parrish played the part in the movie because the studio could not wait. Carlm0404 (talk) 22:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  why a different Daisy Mae player