Talk:Ligonier Ministries

message: I'm surprised that this article wasn't deleted. There's been absolutely no cooperation on the part of editors to make this article conform to Wiki policies and the manner in which the deletion discussion took place broke down into little more than a popular vote.  Wikipedia deletion policy: "A deletion debate is not a popular vote, but a way of obtaining editors' views as to whether an article meets policy guidelines or not." 
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. This isn't a Wiki article because it's not encyclopedic. It's a marketing puff piece that's worded as though it was written by Ligonier's advertising/promotional department. See  Wikipedia is not a soapbox. While I agree that Ligonier Ministries should have a Wiki I object to this article continuing in its present form since it so obviously violates Wiki policies. It must be cleaned up. The fact that prior discussion resulted in a decision to keep this article doesn't eliminate the obligation for this article to conform with Wiki policy. --Frame-work 16:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here, here. Take a stab at it. --Flex 19:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

text: If we can't come up with anything better than the "puff piece," I think we should just redact it down to a stub, not delete it. --Flex 13:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If no one objects, I'll try to take some time over the weekend to cut out the "puff" parts.  I'm a Reformed Christian with at least some knowledge of Ligonier, so I should be able to do a reasonable job of leaving the facts intact.  I'll report in once I've finished, and hopefully someone else will point out anything they think I've missed. Arathon 17:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Go for it! --Flex 20:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about the delay.  Schoolwork and all.  I will put this on my list of things to do, but if someone else feels like doing it, feel free.  I'd request that even if the article ends up seeming disjointed, only remove pieces that are obviously fluff.  It seems to me there's a lot of factual statements swimming around in there in the midst of all of the other stuff. Arathon 00:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Fine by me. --Flex 18:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I deleted the notice because this discussion is fair warning. The advert template has been there for a while. --Flex 19:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-encyclopedic Content

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion