Talk:Antiandrogen

message: Does the use of antiandrogenes make a man sterile?  Or does it only reduce his fertrility drastically?
2007-03-15 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.
* as I understand it, it depends on the drug in question. Long-term use of androgen blockers will certainly cause atrophy of the gonads which may or may not be reversible. I believe that after a number of years, fertility may be permanently impaired. (Just my opinion. Not medical advice, etc) - Alison☺ 18:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consequences on reproduction 

message: plz tell me what i use to male to female transsexual and which madisian i use n how much .and i can get easealy in indiaplz tell me the proper name of antiandragonic harmones that which name i can find it
This is not a proper place to ask such questions.  Please ask a professional Gynaecologist instead!
2011-01-03  Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.247.167.71 (talk) 16:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male to female transsexuals 

message: The biological process of cancer evolution was inaccurate. The portion didn't contribute anything to the article.Jdoelder (talk) 18:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antiandrogen Withdrawal Response Removal 

message: I'm a biology student at Boston College and as an assignment for my class, Environmental Disruptors of Development I did research on antiandrogens and have updated the Wikipage. Advice and suggestions would be greatly appreciated! I will continue working on the page throughout this semester.
Kbell90 (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BI513 Editing Comments 

message: Regarding the phytochemicals section, it may be cleaner to either convert the section to a paragraph format or to a bulleted list. Simply listing examples of plants that naturally produce antiandrogen chemicals looks choppy. If you want to keep the individual plants separate, I would expand each kind to a paragraph rather than single sentences. 
Some possible edits, as well:
*Some exposition of the claim that 3,3'-Diindolylmethane is the "best known plant-derived anti-androgen" is required if you are to use this statement. The linked article does not offer evidence of DIM being the "best known" 
*The use of KMKKT and AGN break up the flow of the explanation of this plant and its antiandrogenic properties. This sentence should either be expanded to explain the meaning of KMKKT, as used in the research article, or should be removed. As it stands, it doesn't offer much.
*The link to Duke's Database, while informative, does not really belong in the body text of a Wikipedia article. If you wish to keep this in, it may be more appropriate to move this link to an External Links section at the bottom of the article.
--DeusetScientia (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Phytochemicals

message: **I had this under an incorrect heading! just reposting!
Overall, I thought this was a great article!
- seem to have a lot of reliable sources
- very well organized
Just a few things I would change:
- The intro/lead section seems to mention a lot of facts in isolation from one another, and they are not really expanded upon in any significant way. For example, you say, "certain plant species have also been found to produce antiandrogens." Later, you mention plants but not significantly, so maybe this fact could be left out of the intro. 
- I would say that the "prostate cancer" seems a bit long, and contains some superfluous, too-deflated information that could be omitted.
- At the end of the prostate cancer section, you mention "one study," and elaborate it, but do not name it, which I think would be helpful as it imply its significance.
- You talk about pharmaceuticals for men and pharmaceuticals for women, but the men section seems more detailed and adds more info about using antiandrogens to treat medical issues with men, but does not have this same level of depth for women section.
- The sentence under "pharmaceuticals for men": "On occasion, antiandrogens are used as a male contraceptive agent." --> contains not reference and is not elaborated upon
Envdisrup2 (talk) 01:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: In Mechanism/types there is "Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) (e.g., andarine, enobosarm (ostarine)) (mixed/partial)" but they seem pro-androgen not antiandrogen - I've replaced them with an approved antagonist : Enzalutamide - Rod57 (talk) 23:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  SARMs listed all seem to be agonists