Talk:Habsburg monarchy

message: Would benefit the article. Ksenon 18:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map of the empire

message: I see the text "susan kroh was a very important asset to austria's devolepment" at the beginning of this article's text, but when I try to delete it, it does not appear in the edit box. Can someone fix it? Juro 00:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was on Template:History of Austria. I've removed it. john k 01:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: As an Native Austrian and History Student I tried to complete and correct the Habsburg Monarchy article by adding facts and doing some detail corrections, by using Material and Sources here from Austria. 
If my work can help to make Wikipedia better and to provide its users correct Informations, I´m very happy to do so.
Yours 
Xandl Hofer November 6th 2008 (23:08)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.124.101.62 (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tried to Fix and Complete Articles

message: I do not understand the use of the word "appellation" in the lead paragraph:
"The Habsburg Monarchy (or Habsburg Empire) is an unofficial appellation amongst historians for the countries and provinces which were ruled by the junior Austrian branch of the House of Habsburg (1278–1780),"
The link provided is extremely unhelpful:
"An appellation is a legally defined and protected geographical indication used to identify where the grapes for a wine were grown; other types of food often have appellations as well. Restrictions other than geographical boundaries, such as what grapes may be grown, maximum grape yields, alcohol level, and other quality factors, may also apply before an appellation name may legally appear on a wine bottle label."
I really don't see what an "appellation" has to do with the Habsburg Monarchy.
???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.23.203.39 (talk) 14:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wiktionary page is perhaps more helpful in this case (where it defines appellation as "a name, title or designation"). —Sowlos  12:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appellation? 

message: That shouldn't redirect here, as it refers to a distinct concept from the subject of this article. The term "Habsburg Hereditary Lands" refers not to "all territories held on a hereditary basis by the House of Habsburg" but specifically to the lands held by the Austrian branch of the Habsburgs prior to 1526 - that is, to Upper and Lower Austria, Styria, Carinthia, Carniola, the littoral provinces, Tyrol, the Vorarlberg, and the Vorlände in Southwest Germany. It does not include the Burgundian Lands, the various Iberian and Italian territories, the Lands of the Bohemian Crown, Hungary, or the lands taken in the partitions of Poland, even though some of those territories were held by the family on a hereditary basis. There ought to be an article specifically about the Hereditary Lands, which comprised most of the territory of the present-day Republics of Austria and Slovenia, as well as some territories now in Croatia, Italy, and Germany. john k (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "Habsburg hereditary lands" has existed since 2005; you should either replace it yourself or use WP:RFD. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Habsburg Hereditary Lands 

message: Link to the Habsburg family tree redirects to the french wiki.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.48.161.76 (talk) 10 December 2013
::I was wondering about that.  Is this  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habsburg_family_tree inadequate?  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 23:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fixed now, thanks. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross Language Link

message: Why is the 1556 the start date and why Spanish is all absent? they were Habsburg  as anyone else? Hóseás (talk) 11:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 1556?

message: Austrian Monarchy Austrian Empire existed only from 1804.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.38.182.33 (talk) 14:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   '''Austrian Monarchy''' (''Österreichische Monarchie'')

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Habsburg Monarchy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111123182839/http://www.wien-vienna.com/austrohungary.php to http://www.wien-vienna.com/austrohungary.php
*Added archive https://archive.is/20070320190321/http://worldheritage.heindorffhus.dk/frame-CzechRepPrague.htm to http://worldheritage.heindorffhus.dk/frame-CzechRepPrague.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Until I read this page, I'd always known it as the "Hapsburg Empire".  But I see that that is merely a redirect to this article's page, which uses the spelling "Habsburg" exclusively.  Is "Hapsburg" a misspelling?  If so, then it appears to be a common one, and therefore should perhaps be noted as such somewhere in the article. Ross Finlayson (talk) 12:48, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the spelling "Hapsburg" be mentioned at all? 

message: Is this about the Habsburg Monarchy which existed from 1526 to 1804 or the Habsburgs in general? Kanto7 (talk) 04:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's about the Habsburg Monarchy, focused between 1282–1918.(KIENGIR (talk) 21:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this article about? 

message: The was a section with portrait paintings of members of the Habsburg house. I can find it anymore. Does anybody have an idea what happened?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammartaibi (talk • contribs) 06:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portraits 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. There is consensus that the sources do not capitalize "monarchy" often enough to meet MOS:CAPS's substantial-majority threshold. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Habsburg Monarchy →  – Case norm; sentence case per WP:NCCAPS; MOS:CAPS; most books on the topic use "Habsburg monarchy" in sentences. Dicklyon (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

text: To be fair, it was open for a full seven days, and consensus seemed to be established. Jules (Mrjulesd) 11:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 March 2022 

message: Habsburg Empire officially did not exist, you can not found this term in official seals in official letters neither in any official documents. It was an umbrella term coined/invented by historians.--Longsars (talk) 16:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What does the presence or absence of a term have to do with whether or not the thing referred to existed? Yes, it is an umbrella term coined by historians. So what? Srnec (talk) 01:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to the persistent and unjustified removal of historically relevant informations by the editor User23242343, which doesn't seem to understand that they have to settle this matter on the talk page and reach consensus with other users before deleting relevant content from WP articles (, , , ), I decided to reopen this discussion in order to do so.
If I understand correctly by their edit summaries (), User23242343 thinks that the Holy Roman Empire and the Habsburg monarchy are "not coterminous" (not the same political entity), but this claim is not sourced and doesn't justify in any way the persistent and unjustified removal of historically relevant informations from this article. User23242343, please provide a further explanation for your edits and academic, reliable references which demonstrate that the Holy Roman Empire and the Habsburg monarchy are allegedly unrelated political entities. GenoV84 (talk) 18:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that the Habsburg monarchy and the territories upon which the House of Habsburg used to rule over for centuries, including the Holy Roman Empire and several other European kingdoms (Bohemia, Hungary, Croatia, etc.), are consistently referred to as a "personal union" or "composite monarchy" by contemporary historians, I find it rather unlikely to be the case. See the following academic reference:  GenoV84 (talk) 20:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Holy Roman Empire as a whole was definitely not part of the Habsburg monarchy as it is usually understood and as the map shows. Other than that, I have no idea what this is about. Probably this article shouldn't have an infobox. Srnec (talk) 21:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Habsburg Empire is an unofficial term coined by historians