lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jerzy Ficowski

message: It would be a stretch to call Ficowski famous, but he is certainly notable. His works have been widely translated, with Regions of the Great Heresy, his biography of Bruno Schulz, doing particularly well in the west. He was prominant enough to have his entire output banned by the Polish government, and he was politically active during the 70s. The fact that the Guardian published an obituary for him is certainly indicative of a notability outside of Polish literature. Rje 14:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: My Polish is not very good but I am quite sure that the translation given for Amulety i defilacje is not correct. Definition is definicja in Polish. Defilacja is not in my rather short dictionary and the word is also very rare online, but from context I would speculate it means ritual pollution (a very important feature of Romani beliefs), like in the English defile.
Maybe someone can look it up in a better dictionary. 
Martinvie (talk) 18:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation of ''Amulety i defilacje''
Talk:Topological entropy

message: We have entropy defined using a measure.
We have entropy defined using topology.
And we have entropy defined using a metric.
Why do we keep calling the "measure-theoretic" entropy as "metric-entropy"? I suggest changing it to "Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy", or even "measure-theoretic entropy".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by André Caldas (talk • contribs) 00:47, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Measure, metric and topology

message: Since I last looked at this article, a section was added called Definition of Adler, Konheim, and McAndrew but the definition given there seems to be identical, at least to my tired eyes, to the definition of Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy.  Now the lead explains that this is somehow an improvement, but I don't see quite what the difference is ... Soo .. what's up with that? linas (talk) 03:56, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy is measure-theoretic, i.e. it depends on the invariant measure μ, whereas the topological entropy is purely topological, i.e. it depends only on the topological conjugacy class of the map T. There is a very important relation between the two notions, the variational principle: htop(T) is the supremum over all invariant measures of hμ(T). You can read the details in the Scholarpedia article. Arcfrk (talk) 14:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy
Talk:Heraldic visitation

message: I think it's an interesting and well written article, but I'm missing an exploration of the political background: why was it important for the crown to control the use of arms and the claims of gentility? Also it could benefit from a list of literature in addition to the notes, and perhaps also a picture, for instance the one that's on Garter Principal King of Arms? Eixo 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments for Improvement

message: For the following reasons :
* Lacking in references.
* Too many red links. Done
* There is some evidence ... and what are they? Done
* Please rephrase this line The process did not begin in earnest, though, until the sixteenth century. Done
* Needs at least a picture. Done
* Give more details about the cease to use arms if used illegally and give examples if any are availables.
* In what are the Scottish visitations different from the English ones. Done
Lincher 00:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How many references would be needed to make this a good article? For the length of the article, the inline citations seem reasonable.--dave-- 03:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA failed

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article, but there are issues that might be looked at for the future. Specifically, citation is barely enough for GA and should be more liberally used in the article to demonstrate that the topic has been properly covered by the references given. In addition, the lead is very short and does not provide effective context. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 14:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps

message: This article is below par. The content itself seems relatively broad, but the referencing and layout just isn't up to scratch. There are whole sections without any citations at all, not to mention unreferenced innumerable claims in the better parts of the article. I've posted in the Heraldry wikigroup to see if someone wants to take this on, but I may be forced to remove the GA status, which would be a shame. Any one have the time/expertise/inclination to take this on? Sotakeit (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: GA status
Talk:Ghost Stories of an Antiquary

message: Created page from the public domain LibriVox.org description. Additional formatting/content requested. thistlechick 14:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Created 

message: A public domain audio recording of this text is available at http://librivox.org/ghost-stories-of-an-antiquary-by-m-r-james/
Please consider including this link on the article page.
thistlechick 16:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain Audio Recording 

message: Just wondering - while James' stories undoubtedly have Gothic elements (medieval churches, colleges, etc), my understanding was that he is considered to have removed many of the tropes of the Gothic horror story, instead beginning a subgenre which is classified as the "antiquarian" ghost story. Rob (talk) 22:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gothic fiction? 
Talk:ETSU/Mountain States Health Alliance Athletic Center

message: "attempt to increase attendance at the university's struggling football program"
How accurate is the statement above considering ETSU defeated Louisiana Tech, led by quarterback Terry Bradshaw, in the Grantland Rice Bowl in 1969? Could one conclude that the Dome was built because the football team was successful?
:Historically, ETSU football was never very successful. That season was a rare moment of success for the program. 174.99.28.2 (talk) 02:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why in the world does each link that I find for FHCC either go to the venue in Kentucky or redirect to THIS page???
Mezzo71 (talk) 23:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because there is no article for Freedom Hall Civic Center, so people who don't know better are redirecting links to articles for other facilities -- Foetusized (talk) 16:48, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freedom Hall... 

message: According to the Johnson City Press, the Tennessee Board of Regents has approved the renaming of Memorial Center to ETSU/Mountain States Health Alliance Athletic Center -- Foetusized (talk) 16:48, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Rename?

message: For future use in expanding and adding citations to this article --  -- Foetusized (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspaper article
Template talk:Serbia topics

message: This template has been merged with template Politics of Serbia Electionworld = Wilfried (talk 14:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I took the liberty to shorten this navbox, which was longer than most of the articles it was attached to, by dropping out less relevant links; we can't link every single Serbia-related article from here. Even now, some more could be dropped out, but I think I selected the most relevant ones. Duja► 10:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortening
Talk:Baumes law

message: The capitalization of the "L" in law, as well as the singular/plural of that word, seems to be somewhat eccentric in the sources.  This usage seems to be the one most popular among the more scholarly of these.  At any rate, it's a judgement call, and I'm makin' it. If you disagree, we can talk about it here. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 14:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Still needs an infobox this might work:

Also lead needs expansion, see WP:LEAD. Aboutmovies 16:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:South.Point Tuggeranong

message: I have never heard of "Centro Tuggeranong", outside of Wikipedia, and I doubt I know anyone else who has. It's not how its known, it's not how it markets itself, as far as I am aware it doesnt trade under that name, so why the change?WA Burdett 10:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked on the weekend, and all the signs still say Hyperdome.  The website says hyperdome.  User:Rebecca did the move on 15:21, 3 August 2007 with no explanation that I can see.  Is there a special move log ?GB 02:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the move? 

message: It was renamed South.Point in May 2018. 
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/act/the-tuggeranong-hyperdome-is-no-longer-called-the-hyperdome-20180509-p4zeaz.html
I'm not sure what the process is to rename/move the entire page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.181.87.183 (talk) 15:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what would be best, in terms of a redirect or renaming of the page - I might ask at the Teahouse, and conduct any recommended changes. SunnyBoi (talk) 07:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

text: That South.Point is the official name, but see if you can find out that anyone else uses that name. As far as I am concerned the name is still hyperdome. The Wikipedia title reflects what is the most common use, and since that is biased by references written in the past, it takes a while to prove that people are now using a new name. The correct way to handle a name change is to move the page, which will automatically leave a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed South.Point
Talk:Writely

message: It should be mentioned both here and in Google Notebook that by a widespread conspiracy theory, Google Notebook is a (the) reincarnation of Writely. --Oop 14:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a conspiracy theory - no need to put it into the article until it has been confirmed. I personally don't think so. Writely is a word processor, while Google Notebook is just a virtual scrapbook - not something to really type or edit manuscripts. –-  kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 01:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

message: i've removed the JPEG screenie and i've added a high-res PNG screenshot...
==
You'l need to update that now as the page format has changed and Writely has become Google Docs 81.155.113.180 10:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a PNG screenie
Talk:Genma Wars

message: *I'm moving this to Genma Taisen so that the article can cover the manga Genma Taisen, the movie Harmagedon, and the TV series Genma Wars just like the Japanese article. Evan1975 22:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving to Genma Taisen

message: Hito simply means "human".　Is there any particular reason for the word to stay untranslated from Japanese? 192.51.44.16 (talk) 00:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hito people 
Talk:Hayao Miyazaki's Daydream Data Notes

message: Found 3 different titles for this work, so I did a google test:
* Hayao Miyazaki's Daydream Notes - 7 results
* Hayao Miyazaki's Daydream Data Notes - 35 results
* The Notebook of Various Images - 2 results (all on the Hayao Miyazaki page
So I've moved the article to the second title. Ninja neko 08:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: No reference to "Doro Mamire no Tora" ('Tigers in the Mud').
Is this because it is not publised in English, or you weren't aware of it?
A reference is at http://www.nausicaa.net/miyazaki/manga/otto.html
Notably "Hans no Kikan" appears in this work.
122.106.86.61 (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related Work 
Talk:Headgear (artist group)

message: I've added other members involved with Headgear.  Is Headgear still active?  Also, which is the correct way to order Japanese names.  For example, the reference lists Tori-Miki as a member - but the wiki page is Miki Tori? Jonpatterns (talk) 14:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Added other members of Headgear/ Correct order Japanese name

message: :curprev 08:57, 16 July 2016‎ Talking Saul talk contribs‎ m  1,045 bytes 0‎  Talking Saul moved page Headgear (artist group) to Headgear (group) undothank
::Old undiscussed move, but was at stable title for a decade before that. So undone. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Old move reverted
Category talk:Anime OVAs

message: Naruto's main article page mentions the OVAs, but there is a separate article concerning only the OVAs.  When trying to decide where to palce the "Anime OVAs" category tag , I wasn't sure:  Where should the "Anime OVAs" category tag be placed? 
*On all specific OVA artcile pages?  
*On the main article page?
*On either, but just once per title?
I wonder if there is a convention on the practice, or if there should be, such as Place the tag only once per title, on the most specific article that allows accessing or linking to any OVAs in that series." I ask, because some list the category directly on the main page, but not on the actual OVA article page, but others do it conversely, which I found a bit confusing.  If you want to better understand the inconsistencies, navigate to a couple of the items in the category list to see what I mean.
Any thoughts on the subject would be appreciated.  --Byakuren 14:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently, the tag is running on auto-add mode. Which means that it's being added automatically anything someone uses the OVA infobox. Technically I suppose it should only be added for the specific OVA article, but at this point in time double adds are ok. Don't do it unless use of infboxes forces you to though. I guess technically the OVA infobox shouldn't even be used on the main page if it's used on an OVA page. Need to start standardizing Infobox use it seems.--SeizureDog 21:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper place for tag
Talk:Hideaki Sorachi

message: Can some one put down his huge interest in bleach?Grimmjow E6 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLEACH 
Talk:Hideo Yamamoto

message: The intro states that "Yamamoto made his professional debut in 1989 by drawing the manga Sheep, written by Masahiko Takasho.". I looked at the Japanese page and it seems to also state that Sheep was finished in 1988 while the japanese page for Masahiko Takasho gives an even earlier year of 1987. Does anyone know what the correct year is for the debut? aibyou_chan (talk) 23:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Debut year
Talk:152 mm howitzer-gun M1937 (ML-20)

message: Why is the Kv-2 not under self propelled mounts? the ML20 was used int he KV-2--174.0.51.118 (talk) 01:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, KV-2 mounted the 152 mm howitzer M1938 (M-10). Bukvoed (talk) 07:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: self propelled mounts

message: Well, after half of week only following participants said their words to the rename discussion topic: Balcer, Bukvoed, MoRsE, LostArtilleryman. All others are inactive, at least in mentioned time period. Now the opinions area is:
* All four agree to replace Russian xx-mm to more English traditioned xx mm (same for inches, lines, possibly puds and so on).
* The opinions is divided concerning developer index in parenthesis. Balcer and LostArtilleryman are the strong supporters of this, MoRsE is in strong opposition, Bukvoed will agree with any prevailed point of view.
So, when I'm writing this posting now, the supporters of including developer index have majority of votes. But I offer wait for coming weekend and if there will not be any other votes, make a decision, which is now like 122 mm howitzer M1938 (M-30). LostArtilleryman 04:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. Balcer 14:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resume on propositions 

message: Sorry to come in late.  To add to the above, gun-howitzer is a correct English term, and I believe it would be the correct translation of the Russian howitzer-gun. (Do the two terms g.-h. and h.-g. have different meanings in Russian?)  See howitzer. —Michael Z. 2007-07-17 05:49 Z
: In Russian "howitzer-gun" is an artillery system where howitzer features dominate over gun ones. ML-20 is a good example of howitzer-gun: it has a good elevation but moderate muzzle velocity. "Gun-howitzer" means vice vesa case, where gun features dominate over howitzer ones. When A-19 gun was introduced, it often referred as gun-howitzer - it has moderate elevation (45 degrees, but it is equal to elevation of WW1 Russian short barreled howitzer) and high muzzle velocity. LostArtilleryman 06:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gun-howitzer 
Talk:Hiro Mashima

message: Hey, I'd really appreciate it if someone could maybe give me Hiro's e-mail? I'm trying to contact him about something, and I really don't wanna do letters. They're not my thing, and due to parents being strict, I'm not allowed to have social media. I'd really appreciate this and thanks, guys!!! 
(Aye, Sir!) Alicat66 (talk) 06:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CONTACT!
Talk:76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)

message: Dear Wikieditors, I'Ve enjoyed this article and I think that it can be improved to a higer standard with a little rework. I found the "History" section a bit too chunky, grouping information about the gun's development as well as its use diring WW2. I suggest that these two topics are treated separatley to increase the clarity of the article. I also found confusing the section "Combat history" where it mentions that "A battery of ZiS-3 consisted of four guns, with three batteries combined into a division, or battalion.", given that a division is a much bigger unit than a battalion. Which is the source used for this statement?. I don't have written bibliography on this topic, hence can't amend the article as suggested.  Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 06:42, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "History" section should be streamlined 
Talk:57 mm anti-tank gun M1943 (ZiS-2)

message: Главное Артиллерийское Управление Вооружённых сил СССР. 57-мм противотанковая пушка обр. 1943 г. Краткое руководство службы. — М.: Воениздат МВС СССР, 1946.
Министерство обороны СССР. Таблицы стрельбы 57-мм противотанковой пушки обр. 1943 г. — М.: Воениздат МО, 1969.
Главное Артиллерийское Управление Красной армии. Краткие таблицы стрельбы 57-мм противотанковой пушки обр. 1943 г. — М.: Воениздат НКО, 1943.
Главное Артиллерийское Управление Красной армии. Краткие таблицы стрельбы 57-мм противотанковой пушки обр. 1943 г. — М.: Воениздат НКО, 1944. Tengu99 (talk) 03:08, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian References for Ammunition Tables
Talk:Offshore investment

message: I removed some. Still
 However, the modern, well-regulated offshore centres allow legitimate investors to take advantage of...
sounds like an advertising brochure for Panama etc. Zezen (talk) 23:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stinks of PR and COI
Talk:Lakshmi Stuti

message: This is not translation or transliteration of a text. This is a well known prayer of Hindus. I have supplied the relevant background found in an ancient scripture called Sri Vishnu Puran. Further, I have provided the meaning in English in my own words. Pankajwillis 14:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine by me. I would suggest, however, that you consider copying the original sanskrit text to Wikisource and link it from here, because there are relatively few users on the English Wikipedia who can read sankrit. As for the background/context/english translation/meaning/etc, that could remain here of course. Thanks --Zoz (t) 15:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have copied and pasted the text from the article that was considered a candidate for Wikisource here (commented out to reduce talk page length). It was removed from the article per WP:NOT. Barkeep Chat | $ 16:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource
Talk:Musa Sudi Yalahow

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 19:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Fort Lesley J. McNair

message: I merged them. Please delete the "Fort McNair" (not "Ford Lesley J. McNair") article. * Daysleeper47, 6/7/06 11:00hrs EDT —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Daysleeper47 (talk • contribs) .
:*I'm cleaning up after the merge.  Cheers.  --Starionwolf 06:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

message: It is obviously anachronistic to caption the 1865 photo Fort Lesley J. McNair.  What names were used before 1948? Sparafucil (talk) 23:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming 

message: The article on the Congressional Cemetary mentions there was a large explosion here during the Civil War. I am no expert, but hooped for more information here. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 08:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil War explosion?
Talk:Birotron

message: Wow!!!  The Birotron brings back very fond memories for me.  I was looking up Dave Biro on the internet because he is an old friend of mine with whom I've lost touch since the early 80s.  On the original Birotron, Dave recorded my voice on those eight tracks for the upper octaves. This is too cool -- I had no idea there was an article about the Birotron here . This probably isn't appropriate for a talk page, but, hey, so what?  We're humans! I remember when Dave went to England to work with Rick Wakeman on the Birotron and it was so exciting because we were die-hard Yes fans.  Eight tracks, lol!!!  Wonder where Dave is up to now. Sigh...ah, youth!  Sylviecyn 15:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

message: ‘Past history’ is a form of pleonasm, history is always in the past!  You can discuss ‘ancient history’ or ‘recent history’ however these need associated timeframes provided to be meaningful (could be millions of years or milliseconds).  ‘Past history’ and similar pairs/collocations that are regarded as not meeting the requirements of WP:TERSE will be automatically modified by AWB.  I think ‘early’ achieves what you want. Neils51 (talk) 05:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Play (Jennifer Lopez song)

message: In fact the chorus is sung by Christina Milian. 37.109.146.106 (talk) 20:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chorus