Talk:Presidential Medal of Freedom

message: Under section, History of the Award: "The medal may be awarded to an individual more than once". Yet Executive 9586 reads, "No more than one Medal of Freedom shall be awarded to any one person, but for a subsequent act or service justifying such an award a suitable device may be awarded to be worn with the medal."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.214.185 (talk) 01:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy? 

message: I know the alphabetical list is just terrific, but I also think there might be value in creating a chronological list of recipients.  Any takers?  If not, I'll get around to it.  But which list should remain on this page?  Perhaps a two column list with one column alphabetical and the other chronological?  --ABQCat 04:03, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological list of recipients 

message: I could use some help clearing up a discrepancy. This article states that Truman created the Medal of Freedom in 1946. However, in editing the article about Carole Lombard (who died in 1942), I found lots of information which says that she was posthumously awarded the medal by Franklin D. Roosevelt, Truman's predecessor. Either this wasn't the medal she got, or else the medal was available before 1945, or else Roosevelt granted it after he left office - would someone help me straighten this out? - Brian Kendig 14:49, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Roosevelt didn't leave office - he died while in office.139.48.25.61 (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created by Truman or FDR? 

message: The original Medal of Freedom award was established by Truman Executive Order 9586 in 1945 to award civilian recipients the civilian analogue to the military Medal of Honor.  I believe the award was dropped after the war was over.  At that time, not only the President, but other governemental entities could award the medal.  It was called the "Medal of Freedom" - the word "Presidential" was not associated with the medal until Kennedy re-established the medal in 1963 as the "Presidential Medal of Freedom".  This new medal was designed to be awarded to those who had a lifetime impact on American life, and hence could be awarded to journalists, artists, entertainers, sports figures, etc.   I believe it is awarded only by the President.  Physically, the original Medal of Freedom is a far different medal than the current Presidential Medal of Freedom.  It appears to be a bronze 1" or so medal with the profile of a Roman warrior (?) and the word "Freedom" on it.  It is suspended from a red ribbon with 4 narrow vertical white stripes.  [Link to pictures of old and new medals removed 4/19/2006.  DFJ] 
My father, Howard M. Jenkins, was awarded the Medal of Freedom in 1945 for work he performed "...in the prosecution of the war against an enemy [Germany] from 1 June 1944 to 1 May 1945."  I was present at the award ceremony, which took place in the President's Office at Swarthmore College.  While the citation is dated July 6, 1945, I don't know the exact data of the award ceremony; I do have a memory of being excused from school (it may have been summer school) to attend the ceremony, and I have a picture of my dad having the medal pinned on him by an Army peek
I have never seen a list of other recipients of the Medal of Freedom, and would love to see such a listing.
(As far as Carole Lombard is concerned, Roosevelt could not have awarded her any medal after he left office - he died while still in office.)
David F. Jenkins
david.f.jenkins@usa.net
:here is a list of the Medal of Freedom citations issued by Eisenhower and Kennedyhttp://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php#axzz1FtxX92MX Patrickwooldridge (talk) 09:06, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For anyone not familiar with US military awards, I feel called to point out that the Meritorious Service Medal and Legion of Merit are rare and treasured awards; very few sevicepeople retire from service with an award (other than the Purple Heart) as high or higher than a Meritorious Service Medal - much less the Legion of Merit. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 21:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further information re: original Medal of Freedom 

message: I'm pretty sure the Presidential Medal of Freedom is considered the highest US civilian medal and the equal to the Medal of Honor, not the Congressional Gold Medal. Thoughts?
:I believe the congressional gold medal is on the same level, but the Medal of Honor is for risking (or sacrificing) ones own life in the service of your country, or to protect others, while in the military. Skyintheeye (talk) 01:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While there has never been any official declaration of precedence between the Congressional Gold Medal and the Presidential Medal of Freedom, far fewer Congressional Gold Medals have been awarded than Presidential Medals of Freedom: (all figures as of August 2011) since 1776, 143 CGMs have been awarded (averaging less than two medals every three years), whereas since 1963 at least 492 PMOFs have been awarded (an average of over 10 per year). On this basis, one could infer that the Congressional Gold Medal (being a much rarer award - more than 17 times rarer per annum) takes precedence over the PMOF. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 21:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have the time right now to look up the data, but it is conceivable that the PMOF (without distinction) may have a similar award rate to the Congressional Silver Medal while the PMOF with Distinction may more closely approximate the award frequency of the CGM. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 04:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

text: No agency of the U.S. (and specifically no branch of the Armed Services) attempts to make any equivalency between decorations awarded to serving members of the Armed Services and civilian awards. On any service uniform, all military decorations (including all unit decorations) take precedence over any civilian decorations. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 09:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Truman's Medal of Freedom was for "...a meritorious act or service which has aided the United States in the prosecution of a war against an enemy or enemies and for which an award of another United States medal or decoration is considered inappropriate." and thus more like a civilian version of the Meritorious Service Medal than the Medal of Honorhttp://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=59291#axzz1FtxX92MX. Further, the Medal for Merit was, even at the time, superior in precedence to the Medal of Freedom. When Kennedy established the (much more prestigious) Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1963, it eclipsed in precedence both the Medal of Freedom and the Medal for Merit. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 09:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Certainly the PMOF is not comparable to the MOH. Their parallels in the British honours system, for example, would be that the MOH is similar to the Victoria Cross, the PMOF similar to a Knight or Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire, and the PMOF with Distinction similar to a Knight or Dame Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire. The United States has no decoration similar to the George Cross. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 09:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What is it that tells you that the PMOF would be parallel with the Knight/Dame Commander OBE?  I'm not saying you're wrong, but I don't see why they must be parallels.  The MOH would parallel the VC because they are the highest military deocrations of the two respective countries--that analogy I get.  But what's your source for making a parallel between the PMOF and a Knight/Dame Commander?  I would think the parallel award would be the George Cross, since that's the highest civilian decoration of the UK.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.15.147 (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The George Cross is an award for (civilian) valor (the British call it "gallantry"); the PMOF has never been awarded for an act of valor. From Executive Order 11085: "The Medal (PMOF) may be awarded by the President as provided in this order to any person who has made an especially meritorious contribution to (1) the security or national interests of the United States, or (2) world peace, or (3) cultural or other significant public or private endeavors." The Order of the British Empire "recognises distinguished service to the arts and sciences, public services outside the Civil Service and work with charitable and welfare organisations of all kinds." I think the analogy as to grade of award (PMOF to Knight or Dame Commander and PMOFwD to Knight or Dame Grand Cross) is pretty close, but the PMOF is awarded for a range of contributions covered by distinct British orders of chivalry - e.g., British diplomats would receive The Most Distinguished Order of St. Michael and St. George, etc. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 07:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Equal to Congressional Gold Medal or Medal of Honor?

message: The article describes a sash and badge for the first degree of the Medal of Freedom, "With Disctinction," but I have been unable to find a picture of it.
Will someone please add?
:I added a picture to the PMOF page of Donald Rumsfeld displaying his medal With Distinction (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PMoFwD.jpg) some time ago, but someone has since deleted it. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 09:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I threw together an image in Photoshop; it's not great, but it is reasonably accurate. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 19:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  re:  MOF with Distinction 

message: Are there any criticisms of this award - like the President just giving it to people he happens to like?-  Matthew238 06:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms

message: Can we follow Congressional Gold Medal of Honor and move the list of recipients to a new page? -- SilverStartalk 02:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I was bold and did it myself. -- SilverStartalk 02:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movement of list to new article 

message: One presumes the origin of this award is in a perceived need for the U.S. to have the equivalent of a bigtime award for "services to humanity" or "to culture" or "to the nation", something equivalent to the O.B.E. (Britain) or the Legion of Honor (France). For a long time the U.S. was the only major country that had no equivalent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.16.212 (talk) 01:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin? 

message: Someone has the images of Tony Blair and John Howard marked as being awarded by President George W. Bush on January 13, 1999. That cannot possibly be correct, since Bush was not sworn in to office until January 20, 2001. Someone needs to get their facts straight... Blozier2006 (talk) 06:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major research fail... 

message: Somebody should add a photo of Ben Carson getting his medal to the gallery on this article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.186.48.14 (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben Carson won this medal in 2008 

message: The gallery section is unlinked—I'm not sure how to do this but I thought I'd notify someone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.25.140.61 (talk) 21:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery Page Unlinked 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Presidential Medal of Freedom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090812220533/http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Background-on-Medal-of-Freedom-ceremony/ to http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Background-on-Medal-of-Freedom-ceremony/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: why is Rosa Parks not in the gallery as she won the medal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:4061:3500:544F:E8D4:BC74:2B48 (talk) 09:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The gallery only shows a few recipients. The fulls list (which includes Rosa Parks) is at List of Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients. Dmoore5556 (talk) 06:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  rosa parks  

message: If I were in heaven, Nelly, I should be
extremely miserable"
"Because you are not fit to go there, I answered. "All sinners would be miserable in heaven.*
"But it is not for that. I dreamt once that I was there."
"I tell you I won't hearken' to your dreams, Miss Catherine! I'll go to bed, I interrupted again.
She laughed, and held me down; for I made a motion to leave my chair.
"This is nothing" cried she, "I was only going to say that heaven did not seem to be my home; and I broke my heart with weeping to come back to earth; and the ingels were so angry that they flung me out, into the middle of the heath on the top of Wuthering Heights; where I woke sobbing for joy. 'That will do to explain my secret, as well as the other. I've no more business to marry Edgar Linton than I have to be in heaven; and if the wicked man in there had not brought Heathcliff so low. 1 ahouldn't have thought of it. It would degrade me to marry Heathcliff, now; so he shall never know how |love him: and that, not because he's handsome, Nelly, but because he's more myself than I am. Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same; and Linton's is as different as a moonbeam from lightning,
as or frost from fire. |...|
Nelly, I see now you think me a selfish wretch', but did it never strike you that, if Heathcliff and I married, we should be beggars? Whereas, if I marry Linton, I can aid Heathcliff to rise, and place him out of my brother's
a power" 143.59.22.96 (talk) 05:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: Ppl lie about state advisors and they prob pass away earlier than most; honestly, they're nice ppl and are tapped so to speak n may act eratic sum but theyre guts are taken as in mrs clntons book Gutsy Women for meat to spare their friends and family because of era lull in the beef industry so they look tired n their appearance is a mess sorta. 96.29.167.37 (talk) 20:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ppl lie about state advisors; honestly, they're nice ppl 

message: Ppl lie about state advisors and they prob pass away earlier than most; honestly, they're nice ppl and are tapped so to speak n may act eratic sum but theyre guts are taken as in mrs clntons book Gutsy Women for meat to spare their friends and family because of era lull in the beef industry so they look tired n their appearance is a mess sorta. 96.29.167.37 (talk) 20:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ppl lie about state advisors; honestly, they're nice ppl 

message: Ppl lie about state advisors and they prob pass away earlier than most; honestly, they're nice ppl and are tapped so to speak n may act eratic sum but theyre guts are taken as in mrs clntons book Gutsy Women for meat to spare their friends and family because of era lull in the beef industry so they look tired n their appearance is a mess sorta. 96.29.167.37 (talk) 20:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ppl lie about state advisors; honestly, they're nice ppl 

message: Of the hundreds of recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, this article singles out Jim Jordan as worthy of an entire subsection due to the controversy surrounding his award. Many awards are political and some have provoked controversy, but Jim Jordan alone is supposed to be so special that he needs a subsection to cover it. 
I don't think a subsection for any recipient would be appropriate no matter how controversial, but we'd need a consensus to establish that as a practice. Certainly though we can agree that it takes a very high level of controversy to deserve a subsection; given the high profile of the award, some criticism is guaranteed for any political recipient. 
So, is the Jim Jordan controversy especially notable? Given the sources in the article, I would say no. Of the 4 sources in the subsection, only one even mentions criticism: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-defender-ohio-rep-jim-jordan-get-presidential-medal-freedom-n1253737 The criticism it mentions consists solely of two Ohio newspaper editorials and a comment by a former coworker. That's it. Is that really enough to merit a subsection? 
Woozybydefault (talk) 21:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging @CanonNi and @LuK3 for discussion. Woozybydefault (talk) 21:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but I won't participate in this discussion. I only reverted this edit because it was an unexplained content removal. User:CanonNi (talk • contribs) 23:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Same with above. The edit in question did not have an edit summary therefore it was unexplained content removal. --  LuK3  (Talk) 02:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jim Jordan Controversy" is WP:UNDUE