Talk:Fight-or-flight response

message: Can we retitle this for the sake of accuracy over tradition?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.48.222.178 (talk) 13:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Addressed on the live page now — Danachos (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Most scientists have now accepted its new name "fight-flight-or-freeze response"

message: HOW DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT KITTENS ARE THINKING???? 
NO ONE KNOWS FOR SURE. 
SO, WE WONT KNOW UNTIL THE TEST RESULTS COME BACK.
DO YOU KNOW WHAT KITTENS THINK?
"This smacks of original research."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.163.65.143 (talk) 06:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: --Arno Matthias (talk) 17:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I realize this is a joke from over 10 years ago. However, I must disagree. It is incorrect to say that someone with limited language has limited thought - many people who don't or can't speak have rich inner lives. (Mel Baggs and Julia Bascom have written a lot on this subject.) Birdsinthewindow (talk) 21:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Kittens

message: The biological response part of the article is a copy-and-paste directly from the link at the bottom of the article, "http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/chapter4/sec2_1.html", and does not attribute the text to that source.
:Thank you for your remark, it has been attributed now. However, it is not plagiarism, since it's a work of the US government, which makes it ineligible for copyright since it is in the public domain.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 16:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is the first time ever I have heard an excuse for plagiarism being okay as it is "not being copyrighted". Legal mumbo jumbo! A work in text form that has any form of intelligent content shall never be cut-and-pasted, legal or not. One discuss, and one cite, and one provide the footnotes. It is a matter of self-respect. It just feels wrong to read it now, knowing that it probably is taken out of context. I will read the original text instead since it seems to have a content that makes it easier to fully grasp.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.176.227.250 (talk) 23:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is plagiarism, its not a copyright violation --69.209.75.199 (talk) 01:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: Could this article use a somewhat less scientific description of the phenomenon? While the neurochemistry of fight or flight is very interesting, it doesn't actually say anything about the decision between standing ground against a predator/aggressor and turning tail and running in an effort to escape.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.44.40.162 (talk • contribs) June 7, 2005
:Run if you can, fight if you must. --Arno Matthias (talk) 18:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: How can the 'deer-in-headlights' reaction be reconciled with this statement that there are only two options available under high stress or threat?  Many accounts of persons thrown into battle mention 'freezing up,' and suggest that this is not a phenomenon strictly to be associated with deer.
69.138.6.85 04:20, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: — Danachos (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Option? 

message: Can someone smart add on this page why people start to shake when they are in fight-or-flight condition? Janne92
not entirely sure or smart...but i'm guessing it's the epinephrine effect that would cause shaking...epinephrine effects alpha and beta1 and beta2 adrenergic receptors each of which cause physiological effects to the heart (increase rate- tachycardia), lungs (bronchiole dilation), and vessels (vasoconstriction).  Hence why it is super-important when people have allergic reaction and take epipen...they must still go to hospital.  Nizami 02:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is shaking for?

message: I reverted the page as an edit removed about a quarter of the article. I see no reason to remove it, so I put it back. If there is actually a reason to remove so much info, (such as inaccuracy, or whatever) please post that reason here as it is a large change to the article.
: I reverted it back past a couple of edits, the following text was replaced by "@OK" and other inanities...
::"once perceived, is relayed from the sensory cortex of the brain through the thalamus to the brain stem. That route of signaling increases the rate of noradrenergic activity in the locus ceruleus, and the person becomes alert and attentive to the environment.  Similarly, an abundance of " Lou 05:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: Taylor et al. have written an important paper on the difference in the stress response in males and females .   Taylor SE, Cousino-Klein L, Lewis BP, Gruenewald TL, Gurung RAR, and Updegraff JA: Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review 107 (3): 411-429, 2000.
:Now featuring in the "See also" section. Wikipedia has an article for that. --Filippof (talk) 14:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tend and Befriend 

message: I've done a major re-write using a psych textbook as a reference.  I've tried to fuse the original with my additions.  I also added a references section for mine and the previous writer's refs.  This rewrite also addresses the idea of a third option.  Hope everyone who cares likes this.  Please add a reference to the list if you're changing it, as I went to some trouble to properly document these.  Enjoy...  Irayna 08:16, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the narrowly constrained focus based on a purely psychological approach to describe the fight-or-flight response should be altered to a multi-disciplinary approach like  Game theory's section on Biology. Examples of how a Game theoretical lens may help to explain the fight-or flight response include:
# The signaling component of the communication aspect of game theory is present in the form of initial stimulus or in the form of one individual of a colony raising the alarm for other members of the colony.
# Strength-in-numbers concept may affect the decision to fight as seen in mobbing behavior.
# The emergence of symbiotic relationships may be explained by "tend and befriend."
# Payoff as defined in game theory is not only limited to "fitness" but also may include the advantageous outcomes of "feed" or "get your freak on" or "tend and befriend."
--Benjamin Richards (talk) 21:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul 

message: It has been pointed out that there are a variety of options under both the flight response and the fight response [deer in headlight and camouflage]. This led me to the question of whether the response could be more simply stated as "go" or "stay" when confronted by stress. Since the response, whatever we call it, is common among many/most species, it would appear to be very primal on a genetic scale. Consider that it might be the direct result of the "punctuated equilibrium" [Gould - Alvarez] event that re-ordered life on Earth 65,000,000 years BP. And impact of such magnitude would have only allowed two "responses" among survivors. Stay put because you had no choice OR get thrown wildly about in a tumult of epic proportion until you finally latched onto something or landed in a safe place. The experience would certainly have effected all species and might offer a genetic pointer as to when the "flight or fight" [go or stay] response initiated. Bobkiger 15:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What you are describing would not, though, if it were true, share any kind of common genetic marker across phyla; it would be a case of analogous/convergent behavioural traits, hard wired (e.g., instinctive), that were all naturally selected for during/after that event. While 
cases of convergent evolution in response to selective pressures are indeed known, I think the near-universal ubiquity of fight-or-flight strongly indicates that its origins much father back in time, more than 500 million years ago. However, it has also been strongly retained since it arose, and all of the various cataclysmic events in the time since (of which the K-T extinction 65 million years ago was the most recent but not the most extreme) all would have likely had a role. Firejuggler86 (talk) 02:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wondering about genetic marker for this response 

message: Somebody may wish to add a paragraph about “Freeze”.  Many modern theorists believe that Fight/Flight/Freeze is the more accurate dichotomy of this instinctive response.  It’s seen in animals and people all the time. The best example is the dear in headlights or the possum “playing possum” (feigning death). Many people and animals when confronted by a threat like an intimidating dog will instinctively stop moving hoping not to the attract the attention of the threat, then eventually SLOWLY moving away.   Jeff Vollmer LCPC, 5/2/98  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.199.148 (talk) 17:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment, if anyone is thinking about this subject in terms of what is the "right" or "wrong" response to have, they have a fundamental misunderstanding of the entire concept...these responses are instinctual, they are not calculated decisions that ought be judged on an effectual or moral basis. Firejuggler86 (talk) 01:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

text: — Danachos (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Freeze

message: What happened to the other F of this system?  Has it been too long since I took psychology?  Used to be this was referred to as the 4 F's: Feed, Fight, Flee, or get your Freak on.  Yet this article passes the burden of sexual response onto the parasympathetic system article, which offers little other than canned descriptions of physical responses.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.58.221.121 (talk) 02:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: — Danachos (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Another F?

message: Does anybody, really, call this the "fright, fight or flight response" ?
It seems likely,to me, that that expression actually is an erroneous recollection of:
"fight-or-flight-or-freeze response", which is in actual use.
Maybe we should remove the variant: "fright, fight or flight response" altogether?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.20.108.21 (talk) 05:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: — Danachos (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fright"? Shouldn't it be: "Freeze"? 

message: Disambiguity needed for "Serene"? How is that? How many meanings can "Serene" have? In my dictionary (www.ord.se) it pretty much means "peaceful" (no dual meanings) and such meaning fits the context perfectly.
Disambiguation (after my google search) means the act of pinpointing a word's exact meaning within a certain context. Example: "book" can mean a bounded pile of written papers, but "book" can also mean something one do in order to get a seat in an airplane before it takes off. So, disambiguation defines which meaning a word has for those who don't get it out of the context. Now, those who don't get it are often computers, and therefore "Disambiguation" is mostly used in computer Science, since we humans often get the meanings out of the context.
But the word "serene" has no real dual meaning according to my dictionary - and English is not even my first language.
On the other hand, since English is not my first language, I can't tell whether or not the meaning of "serene" is commonly known by ordinary English speakers. I know the meaning since I checked it in the dictionary, just as I once checked the word "banana" when that word was to be learnt. How many of you native English speakers know the word "banana" in foreign languages, by the way?
But IF the case is that most English speaking people don't know the meaning of the word "serene", then that does not mean it needs "Disambiguation". Instead, in such case, the English speaking world needs to read more books and get a proper grip of their own language. Disambiguation does not mean "clarifying". Instead, disambiguity can only be used when there are several meanings of a word. Now, neither "banana" nor "serene" has dual meanings, regardless of how commonly known their meanings are.
It would be so fun if we, the Europeans in the union, were to speak better English than the Americans due to our superior schools... *smiling* Afterall, the Americans need the freshman year in College to catch up with what we learnt in High School whilst we Europeans get into the Sophomore year right away... *smiling*  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.176.227.250 (talk) 23:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Disambiguation needed" for Serene? 

message: All of the sections on this discussion page related to:
* Third Option?
* Tend and Befriend
* Freeze
* Another F?
* "Fright"? Shouldn't it be: "Freeze"?
* Fight-or-Flight-or-Play
* Fawn? (as in the 4Fs in trauma literature)   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.221.188.2 (talk) 02:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: — Danachos (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fight or flight or ? 

message: In the third sentence of the section titled, "Psychology of the stress response," it looks like somebody accidentally the word or phrase after "intense". What is the missing word? "Concentration"? "Physical exertion"? "Action music"? Modus Ponens (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Word 

message: I propose a third response which is psychologically more interesting and more complex.
If you observe lion cubs or just about any animal with the Fight or Flight response, the instantaneous response
of the parent to its own young offspring attacking it is to play.
Any other animal with identical action will evoke the fight or flight response to the attack or threat.
The parent normally does not attack its offspring if it knows the "threat" is from its own very young offspring.
Instead the instantaneous response is to play, this "play" is important to teaching the cubs to survive
when the play later becomes fight or attack to survive.
Just observe the lion cubs going after the parents at the zoo -
Davidmeo (talk) 19:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia articles need to be based on published literature, so however reasonable that idea is, we would not be able to use it unless it has appeared in print somewhere reputable.  Regards, Looie496 (talk) 03:45, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Fight-or-Flight-or-Play

message: I will be working on this page as part of a college course. Please give me suggestions. I have 2000ish words to add to this article for my class.  I don't know if I will actually edit any of the page; I'm just working in my sandbox for now.Langtor (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Assignment

message: I have made a significant amount of modifications to the article. The majority of the contributions are related to adding content, which are all backed up by references. I made minor modifications to the introduction paragraph. I have added content related to the physiological mechanisms of the fight or flight response, which include: autonomic nervous system, sympathetic nervous system, parasympathetic nervous system, and the actual sequence of reaction. Additionally, I added content related to the function of some of the physiological changes that occur during the response. I created new sections called, "evolutionary perspective", "emotional components", and "cognitive components". I created subsections and added content within those new sections, which are: emotional components (emotion regulation, emotion reactivity), cognitive components (content specificity, perception of control, social information processing). I also added content related some of the negative symptoms and effects of the response.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bensmyers (talk • contribs)  15:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that you've actually been working on a copy of the article, User:Bensmyers/modifiedarticle2.  That's a good way to learn, but it's also dangerous, because if several of you are doing that then you may find it very difficult to merge your changes.  If you know who the other people working on this are, I strongly advise you to discuss the problem with them and make a plan that will let you avoid treading on each other's toes.  I'll be happy to advise if it is useful.  Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree that it can be dangerous. In this case, the student that had previously been working on this article is not anymore, and there shouldn't be other conflicting modifications.Bensmyers (talk) 18:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay.  In any case I advise you to apply your changes to this article as soon as it is convenient, lest somebody else edit it in the meantime and create conflicts with your changes. Looie496 (talk) 22:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the changes. I have one problem with my modification that I can't seem to fix and maybe you could help with. I created a different reference list on the page in order to keep track of the references that I added and now I can't seem to integrate that reference list with the list for the rest of the page. Does it even matter if there are two different reference lists?Bensmyers (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like another editor has come along and merged the two sets of references.  That's probably the right thing to do.  Having separate notes and references might make sense, but I can't recall seeing a Wikipedia article with distinct sets of references.  Regards, Looie496 (talk) 00:47, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Modification

message: if I understand everything more or less well then Cannon's theory remains basically unchallenged and unenlarged, except may be the addition of the "tend and befriend" behaviour (while I doubt that this changes Cannon's theory because he probably did not say that "flight or fight (including "freeze" which is a way of disappearing, i.e. fleeing; but "freeze" might also be a third alternative reaction when neither fight nor flight is possible [e.g. animal, blinded by car lights])" is the only possible reaction to stressors (or did he?); he just described this reaction (psychosomatically). would it not be nice to name a scientific text which best sums up the current 'state of the art' (possibly "Goldstein, David; Kopin, I (2007). "Evolution of concepts of stress"...")? thank you? --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  current state of science and "further reading"  

message: is it not strange that the term "sympathicotonia" - subtopic in the article "Sympathetic nervous system" - is not mentioned here? including its possible becoming a chronic state, a character type (see discussion there)?? --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  sympathicotonia 

message: Substituted at 15:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Fight-or-flight response. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130306182338/http://www.endotext.org:80/adrenal/adrenal5/adrenal5.htm to http://www.endotext.org/adrenal/adrenal5/adrenal5.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130808004906/http://learn.genetics.utah.edu:80/content/begin/cells/fight_flight/ to http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/begin/cells/fight_flight/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In other words, when people conform under pressure are they actually running away? I think that should be considered in this article. One can run away from one's fear by running toward the threat, if the threat is an entity that is willing to accept "converts" to its point of view. Conformity to that point of view would negate one's fear of consequences -- ostracization, and so forth. I don't know if I've explained this very well. Maybe someone can do better. Thanks. 2600:8801:BE26:2700:A866:3679:4C81:4609 (talk) 19:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is conformity to a group, cause or line of thinking under the threat of punishment a species of the "flight" response?  

message: — Assignment last updated by Treeluver20 (talk) 18:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PSYC 115 General Psychology

message: We will add more information under the Autonomic nervous system section to better connect the systems to the reactions that they control.
We will add the missing citations under the Function of physiological changes section
Add a few more reactions under the Function of physiological changes section
Information in the Other Animals section of this article will be cited using a respectable secondary source that was found. The information is coming from Adamo A.
Reasons:
There is a lot of lacking information throughout the article and there are also a lot of information that need sources added because we don't know where the information is coming from. 
--Purpleduck26 (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia Assignment Physiology and Other Animals Section

message: Fight or flight 2409:4073:4D4D:D534:0:0:96C8:A30D (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fight or flight