lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Military ranks of Brazil

message: Wouldn't Marshal of the Air Force be a better translation than Air Marshal? Greenshed 19:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would venture to say not. First, the UK does have the rank of Air Vice Marshal as a precedent in English language. Also, when the rank was created in Brazil, it seems that the idea was to designate that that rank was occupied by a marshal (in essence) whose job was the affairs of the air.SrAtoz (talk) 13:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Marechal-do-Ar

message: The Lead has the following sentence:
:This article presents the insignia and ranks of the Brazilian military. These ranks were originally adopted upon Brazil's independence from Portugal in 1822.
Given that the Brazilian Air Force has a unique rank system, and does not use the Brazilian Army's system, I sincerely doubt the FAB was around in 1822. This sentence needs to be changed to be more clear. The date the FAB's ranks were implemented would be good to have, if someone has a reliable source for that. - BillCJ (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a notable fact in Brazilian History that the Air Force was created in 1941. I will add the information citing a source.SrAtoz (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FAB in 1822?

message: The rankings appear to skip from colonel-level to two-star general.  But on another page with the Brazil army's organization chart, there are one-star generals.jrn0074| 9:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The epaulettes have two stars, but the rank is equivalent to an American one-star general. The rank that is skipped is the three-star general.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.42.21.187 (talk) 09:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: One-star general?

message: In the main page, the translation to "Almirante-de-esquadra" is shown as "Squadron Admiral". But a squadron is a limited set of warships that amount to just a fraction of a country's fleet. In contrast, the admiral in question holds the highest rank, and one of them is in fact the Navy's overall commander. At the same time, in strict Portuguese "esquadra" is a collective for ships, but it can also be used to mean the whole of the navy. I submit to you that "Almirante-de-esquadra" should be translated as its equivalent in other navies, "Fleet Admiral". Please mull this over. SrAtoz (talk) 01:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Squadron" Admiral? 
Talk:Bell UH-1Y Venom

message: The crew number under specifications indicate 2 (the pilot and co-pilot), but all Marine Corps utility helicopters fly with a Crew Chief. Would it be appropriate to include the Crew Chief as part of the crew? LokenAkhanteros (talk) 15:06, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That is listing what the crew that are required for flight, not necessarily the full mission crew. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't stay consistent with other aircraft articles, such as the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey and Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion which does specify other mission crew members. LokenAkhanteros (talk) 15:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

text: * I only gave a reason why it is like it is now.  I am not finding any sources currently cited in article that list 3 or 4 crew members now. The Navy Fact File lists 12: pilot and co-pilot, crew chief, gunner and eight troops. But other sources in the article only list pilot and co-pilot. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

text: *:I believe the fact file to be the most reliable source of information about this anyway - The 8 marines listed would better fit in cargo specifications, and gunners are optional, but the Crew Chief is a permanent member of a Venom Crew, no matter the mission. I think it should be included in the crew count. LokenAkhanteros (talk) 15:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: * I feel other source(s) are needed for only flight crew (excluding troop passengers) so this does not get into original research territory. But I won't argue if someone else updates it. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crew count
Talk:Pallam

message: I'm going to go ahead with this merge because it is clear the 2 articles are talking about the exact same thing. I'm going to paste the info from the other page here before moving it into the article so that we can see what, if anything, can be added. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 02:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of Pallom into Pallam
Talk:For Girls Who Grow Plump in the Night

message: The recent amendments to the track listings and musicians litings are contrary to the guidelines in WP:ALBUM - please keep referring to this document when making changes. I've just looked at it again myself and realised I've not been 100% either! Witchwooder 09:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listings 

message: The pregnant girl pictured on the album's gatefold cover was originally shown naked, but shortly before release Deram insisted that she had to be clothed in a nightdress. A picture of the uncensored artwork was printed in Sounds (magazine) at the time. <--citation needed|date=May 2013
This was tagged a year and a half ago, w/o any forthcoming reference.  What ACTUALLY happened was that a pregnant brunette was used for an ad for Caravan's SECOND album - whether this idea was the band's or not, is unknown.  But that was 3+ years before "Girls Who Grow ...."  HammerFilmFan (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  mistake - removed
Talk:Molasses Act

message: Besides being largely irrelevant (the tax subject to the article is not on the finished product but the ingredients), the editor has drawn conclusions unsupported by any reliable secondary sources.  Rather than his conclusion that analysizing the impact would be difficult, the sources cited elsewhere in the article note no such difficulty in their analysis.  Dismissing the educated opinion of noted historians as mere speculation is, likewise, strictly the editor's own opinion. 
Similarly, the listing of the prices of various alchoholic beverage taxes to support the editor's view appears to be contrary to WP:SYN which states:
"Material can often be put together in a way that constitutes original research even if its individual elements have been published by reliable sources. Synthesizing material occurs when an editor tries to demonstrate the validity of his or her own conclusions by citing sources that when put together serve to advance the editor's position. If the sources cited do not explicitly reach the same conclusion, or if the sources cited are not directly related to the subject of the article, then the editor is engaged in original research."
Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No effort to provide sources made since article was tagged in February.  I have now removed the material. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 22:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not certain this was the correct response.  The contributor cites "Miller" (tough without a reference).  In reply to an earlier comment: the trade was probably illegal from 1705 to 1731, when it was legalised subject to the 9d tarriff.  The figure 539,000 gallons is a precise figure and likely to ahve a source; thus not WP:OR.  It is possible the synthesis constitutes WP:OR, but the facts on which it is based probably are not.  I would be happier with the use of the tags "source needed", rather than "fact" which tends to suggest that the veracity of the statemetn is doubtful.  Unfortunately, I do not have immediate access to suitable refernece works in order to resolve this.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The contributor (Brad Major) was not citing Miller but contradicting Miller with nothing but his own opinion.  The figure 539,000 certainly may have a source somewhere, but it refers to the volume of imports in 1770 -- the Sugar and Molasses Act was repealed in 1764.  Why exactly is this information even relevant? Whether better tags could have been used on the article is irrelevant -- the tags have been there since February, and nobody had enough interest in the article to address them.  Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 21:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research
Talk:Iso (automobile)

message: I've written Japanese edition of Iso (:ja:イソ (自動車)) and I found on English Wikipedia there are two Iso articles, Iso Rivolta (this article) and Iso Automobile. I guess both refer to the same Italian motor company. Which should I choose as an interlang?--K.F. 03:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted. I didn't realized that there was an Iso Automobile article. I think it should definitely be merged into Iso Rivolta. I can do that, when I have a minute. Giuliopp 21:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, which of course is the reason for me applying the merge template. Since I'm a newbie on the english WP I'll want to wait with the execution until I learn more here, so Giuliopp: Feel free! Digglern 12:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

message: On another point, Where is the F1 project, which I believe weas called Iso Marlboro?
:Refer to Frank Williams Racing Cars for this. GTHO (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Iso Marlboro

message: I had stumbled upon this page a while back which talks about the Grifo 90 prototype from the 90's. Should we add a new section to include this information?
 
http://www.callawaycars.com/the-company/callaway-cars/%E2%80%A8rivolta/
--Thenerdyengineer (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iso and Callaway? 
Talk:Katyn Polish War Cemetery

message: As per WP:ELBURDEN, disputed external links are excluded until there is positive consensus for their inclusion - IP, if you wish to include the Fandom link please take it to WP:ELN. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Template talk:Differential transforms of plane curves

message: We shall either have one article for all "pedal curves" or all three separate of them . `'mikka 03:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find information on contrapedal curve. If you can - do it, but note that contrapedal curve is much more similar to pedal curve than negative pedal curve (which is inverse operation).--Dojarca 09:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? It is in Mathworld. Anyway, you are right, the definition is similar (but the curve is not). I will try to expand. By the way, what about the "negative contrapedal curve"? Does it have any standard name? `'mikka 17:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Create the new article if you wish. Until you do so, the link to contrapedal curve should not exist in the template.--Dojarca 10:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Even red links may exist in template. Once again, template is for notions not for articles. `'mikka 08:58, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Red links - yes, but not dual links to one article.--Dojarca 09:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Vista-United Telecommunications

message: This article is directly related to telecommunications services for Walt Disney World resort and the Celebration, FL area. Vista-United was a very large part of the development of the area and Walt Disney Company's expansion and diversification. Just because it's old news doesn't mean it should be deleted, is that what encyclopedias are all about?
Thatwasfun 03:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Was Vista-United owned entirely by Disney? The "United" in its name suggests that it was partly owned by United, another telephone company in Florida. --Eastmain 03:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership question
Talk:Noble polyhedron

message: Interesting category. Jonathan Bowers uses it for higher polytopes as well, but no hard references. Meaning: facet-transitive and vertex-transitive. Examples - bitruncation of self-dual regular polychora/honeycombs: bitruncated 5-cell and bitruncated 24-cell, bitruncated cubic honeycomb. Tom Ruen 03:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't be surprised if nothing has been published on this. A great deal of recent polychoron work has gone on but has never made it past Jonathan's and George Olshevsky's websites. Steelpillow 20:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  p.s. perfect polytope seems to be a more general category of vertex/facet-transitives, including the cases above and their duals. Like  Tom Ruen (talk) 20:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In that reference, "perfect polytope" is used in quite a different sense, more akin to the term "pristine" for a spacefiller. For example Table 2 lists several polyhedra having faces in different symmetry orbits - they are perfect but not noble. Equally many noble figures, such as the stephanoids, are not perfect. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noble polytopes/honeycombs 

message: The nobel polyhedra, being face-transitive, would seem to be represented by a single face configuration (as a platonic solid, or catalan solid), although there's geometric ambiguity when vertex figures are not regular. Tom Ruen (talk) 17:58, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: p.s. My guess is new examples may come from Regular skew polyhedron#Finite regular skew polyhedra of 4-space, like the face configuration the crown polyhedra is regular V4.4.4.4, with 4 crossed quadrilaterals around every vertex. Tom Ruen (talk) 01:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Face configuration
Talk:Grosse Tête, Louisiana

message: Throughout the article, the village's name is written with a circumflex - Grosse Tête. It appears that we should rename this article, then, to Grosse Tête, Louisiana. Funnyhat 16:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 
Talk:Round barns in Illinois

message: This article is great and has stood up well since it was created in February 2007 by User:IvoShandor.  Eventually a world-wide list-article List of round barns was created and it has a table with pics on Illinois round barns (to directly jump there, click on List of round barns#Illinois.  I propose copying a version of that table to this article, and revising this article consistent with this being the central place of coverage of round barns in Illinois.  See requested move section above.  The world-wide list-article would link to here for detailed coverage of Illinois.  It might or might not continue to include a table (which could perhaps be abbreviated) in order to  keep the coordinates of the Illinois barns in the linked OSM / Google maps. --doncram 20:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modify article to include table
Talk:Prince Harry (Axis of Time)

message: This page has been vandalised!
:Not necessarily, but it's hard to tell. Biscuittin 23:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandals 

message: I think the middle paragraph of this article belongs in Prince Henry of Wales but I haven't changed it because I'm not sure how much overlap there is between real life and Birmoverse. Biscuittin 23:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real life and Birmoverse
Talk:Spiraea

message: A group of kindergarten students is apparently vandalizing this page. Jermor 03:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I have read enough about these species to know that this page is confusing and misleading, but not enough to go ahead and fix it myself. The problem is that the link is made from the Spiraea genus to the old common name of "meadowsweet" and then the authors proceed to use these names interchangeably.
This is wrong.
The plants which carry the common name of meadowsweet today have all been moved out of Spiraea and now have a genus of their very own named Filipendula. Filipendula contains all the plants traditionally used in European and Amerindian herbal medicines, including ulmaria, which, when it was Spiraea ulmaria (instead of Filipendula ulmaria), gave its name to aspirin.
This Spiraea article may wish to point out or make note of this historical connection, but the connection itself has been severed. Therefore, the words should not be used interchangeably as if the connection was still meaningful or valid. It is not. BeeTea (talk) 21:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Meadowsweet Confusion

message: The section on Uses has "Acetylsalicylic acid was first isolated from Filipendula ulmaria, a species at the time classified in the genus Spiraea".  
I have not been able to find any support for acetylsalicylic acid being found as a natural product in Filipendula ulmaria or anywhere else. The claim is not made in the wiki pages for acetylsalicylic acid or History of Aspirin and is inconsistent with this from the page for Filipendula ulmaria
Chemical constituents include salicylic acid, flavone glycosides, essential oils, and tannins. In 1897, Felix Hoffmann created a synthetically altered version of salicin, derived from the species, which caused less digestive upset than pure salicylic acid. The new drug, formally acetylsalicylic acid, was named aspirin by Hoffmann's employer Bayer AG after the old botanical name for meadowsweet, Spiraea ulmaria
The claim is not referenced in the sentence where it is made and is not supported by any of the references [5,6,7] for the following sentence. --Tslumley (talk) 03:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  As aspirin source
Talk:Union of Burma (1948–1962)

message: Suggest this article be merged into History of Myanmar. Frenchmalawi (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: History of Myanmar is too big. More articles should be created out of it. Jhy.rjwk (talk) 16:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Oku, Cameroon

message: The Fon attempt to change the believes of the people stemmed from his political affiliation with the goverment not because he was a Christian. There was a power fight between him and the "parliament of the village" called Quifon. The past Fons have traditionally stayed politically neutral but Fon Ngum 3 got involved in politics and hence attempted to bring about changes in the village that were quiet unusual. He did not attempt to expand Christianity because he had to first and foremost abandon some Christian beliefs to become the chief. Just want to correct writers assertion that he attempted to spread christianity in the village. 
Mrme—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmemyself (talk • contribs) 03:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Road Atlanta

message: I so wanted to put the rumors of drug planes landing on the back straight in, but couldn't find any references.  But now that it is in I can confirm that those rumors have been around for years.  I've worked in the racing biz around Atlanta for 15 years and have talked to guys who swore they heard the planes landing at night.  Scottanon (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug planes 

message: There appears to be a consensus among a group of Atlanta SCCA members that the first race ever at Road Atlanta was a SCCA regional, not the Can-Am in September of 1970.  It’s also been suggested the first SCCA National Championship race was called the American Road Race of Champions (it became the Champion Spark Plug Road Racing Classic – the CSPRRC – later).
Strixus (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any reliable source mentioning the SCCA Regional?  You're right about the runoffs; it changed names in 1973. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 23:01, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Race 
Talk:Book of Joel

message: I have rewritten the section on dating (which was uncited) based on the outline of Allen, and have ommitted the paragraph arguing for a post-exilic date as based on an out-of-date and summary authority (a general book by William Hendrickson written on the Old Testament in 1947) and probably POV, as it argues one position against the others.--Iacobus (talk) 00:55, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joel’s date 

message: Good place to start:
https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/38566 IncandescentBliss (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help this poor article if you see this :)
Talk:Charles the Child

message: His position as Charles III would be a third generation Charles, as his father would be Charles II the Bald, grandson of Charles I (Charlemagne). But his father is never named "Charles II". If we count all Charles crowned kings, we have to add Charles, the son of Charlemagne, dead before his father.
It's a difficult task to put a number next to the king's name when the realm is divided between numerous sons... cf. Rurikids and Dukes of Greater Poland. Souris2005 03:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's evidently some question what year Chuckie died...  TREKphiler hit me ♠  05:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you explain? Srnec (talk) 21:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Francisco Franco is still dead
Talk:Pneumatic stabilized platform

message: I've reinserted the following text.  It seems quite relevant.  Please don't remove without justification.
However, this proposed design was rejected in October, 2003 due to the difficulty in accessing such an airport, the difficulty in transporting jet fuel, electricity, water, and gas to the structure, failure to address security concerns such as a bomb blast, inadequate room for high-speed exits and taxiways, and environmental concerns. 
- Aagtbdfoua 02:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Diego Decision of 2003 
Talk:Grant Thornton Tower

message: I have heard that Grant Thornton has also acquired signage rights but a design has not been approved by the city yet. Help with sourcing facts related to this would be helpful.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:41, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signage rights 

message: I have heard by word of mouth that when Chicago Title & Trust moved from 161 North Clark to 10 South LaSalle they bought the naming rights for the new building. However, I can not find an WP:RS documenting this. Please comment at Talk:10_South_LaSalle#Naming_rights.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicago Title and Trust naming rights 
Talk:City Hall Square Building

message: Removed the orphaned article tag on 3/6/07. Plenty of "What links here" results. ChicagoPimp 03:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphaned article