lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kirstine Stewart

message: This note is to clarify the reason why her former married name "Layfield" is mentioned in the article, because more than one attempt has been made to remove it in the past. The problem is that the sources used to support a lot of the earlier content refer to her as "Kirstine Layfield" rather than "Kirstine Stewart" — so while it's certainly not our business to publish privacy-invading content about her personal life, our article does have to at least briefly mention the fact that "Kirstine Layfield" was the same person as "Kirstine Stewart" so that our readers don't get confused by the sources. There's no case for our article saying anything more about the matter than it already does, but there's no acceptable reason for it to say nothing about the fact that she was formerly known as Layfield. Bearcat (talk) 22:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layfield
Talk:Kristof Snelders

message: Please help remove the sentence Tommy is at least 6 foot 4. It is not in the article when I want to edit it. Karma-AH (talk) 19:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed it, it was in the template Template:Belgium-footy-bio-stub Gigs (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lauren Hewitt

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  —fetch·comms 02:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lionard Pajoy

message: Can we get this moved to Lionard Pajoy? Leonard isn't the proper spelling in any of the links cited.(Bpmangan (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Siddha medicine

message: Some here claim that there exist Siddha practitioners who are licensed, trained, and thus not quacks. Please show me any shred of evidence that any such license or training requires Siddha practitioners to stop prescribing organic mercury compounds. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Related: Mercury poisoning. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: (...Sound of Crickets...) --Guy Macon (talk) 01:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

text: Yes they do, read them again. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 16:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

text: Why? ... and ... Highlighted what? -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 18:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Enough what? -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 12:13, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Enough information to delete those linksKpbolumbu (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 08:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Question - What was highlighted? Answer - This much was highlighted. Enough? Kpbolumbu (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 08:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence, please.
Talk:Li Ling

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Easy as it gets. Jenks24 (talk) 07:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
*Quick follow-up, Timmyshin: should , , and  redirect to this article or the dab page? Jenks24 (talk) 07:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 October 2015 

message: Need pinyin for 李陵 and/or Hanzi box. 173.89.236.187 (talk) 04:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the pinyin, Zhing'za zï Ïnin (talk) 21:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need pinyin or Hanzi box 
Talk:Lieutenancy area

message: Is there any way to restore the infobox without it affecting the map? It was removed with this diff. Perhaps there needs to be more text, to force the map section below that of the infobox? --Jza84 |  Talk   00:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: The map shows the district council area of Derry superimposed on top of the lieutenancy map. A lieutenancy map should show a much smaller "City of Londonderry". Check out the eight Lord Lieutenants in Northern Ireland.
Derry is one of the 26 district council areas and is not one of the lieutanancy areas.
I don't now have any confidence in the rest of the information in this article. I was looking up something about the the West Riding of Yorkshire 86.145.103.118 (talk) 14:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error on the Map 

message: These two articles are on the same topic, but Ceremonial counties of England is more filled out. This page should redirect there. It even explicitly says on that page that a Lieutenancy area is another name for a ceremonial county. 2600:6C51:797F:41C3:4D5C:DCFF:E2A7:F39C (talk) 21:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That does not apply to Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, so it does not look correct to redirect this page to there. ネイ (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Ceremonial counties of England
Talk:Sports commentary

message: I know often when I'm watching a game on television, the play-by-play is fairly annoying. This article might include the idea that play-by-play can be annoying to some viewers.
24.47.70.12 21:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism of Play-by-Play

message: Play-by-play is a term used mostly in North American only, so I've moved the page to Sports commentary. That's what everyone else calls it. PirateSmackK (talk) 23:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved  

message: It is a huge oversight to omit Howard Cosell from the list of sports commentators.  Football, Boxing, and more, all were part of his domain.  Like him or not, Cosell is still an unforgetable individual when it comes to discussing sports.
Glen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.191.105.27 (talk) 06:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Howard Cosell
Talk:2007 IAAF World Athletics Final

message: Since they don't award actual medals there, should the titles rather be "1st, 2nd, 3rd"? Although, then if the background is grey it's more confusing. And then again, if there is no podium, why only show best three? --Pudeo⺮ 21:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's keep the same format across all track and field results pages now. Punkmorten 21:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which format? --Pudeo⺮ 10:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The one you just changed. We shouldn't change it more than that. Punkmorten 12:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template titles
Talk:The Royal Gazette (Bermuda)

message: I have removed the following sentence: "Some seriously question the legitimacy and independence of a 'lone' newspaper."
It is both unsourced, and a perfect example of WP:WEASEL. If someone would like to provide a verifiable source for this claim and reword it in a less ambiguous manner, I encourage them to do so. Plasticup T/C 21:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced claim, weasel words, etc
Talk:CMBR

message: Hi!
Did you know, that in Environmental Engineering CMBR also means "completely mixed batch reactor"?
Please add that.
(Gilbert M.Masters, Wendel P. Ela: "Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science", Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, ISBN 0-13-148193-2, p. 10)
--Saippuakauppias ⇄ 21:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lord High Admiral of the Wash

message: In 1573 the Admiralty of the Wash was granted to the Corporation of Boston, the Mayor being Admiral to this day. How does that fit with the Le Stranges still holding the title? Opera hat (talk) 22:46, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The one given does not work - and there is nothing suitable obvious (not being based upon the WP article) on a websearch. Jackiespeel (talk) 15:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Hubble sphere

message: I propose that this article be merged with Observable universe, since they describe the same thing and Hubble volume is given as an alternative title in the aforementioned article. Cosmo0 21:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  --Parsifal Hello 07:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Observable universe
Talk:Helen Fospero

message: I reverted a change to birth date from 28 November 1966 to 30 August 1966 made by an IP as I could not verify the change. Having searched around I cannot find any suitable source to support either date. There is also no GRO Index entry for her birth in 1966 under what is reported as her birth name. Keith D (talk) 20:56, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Nastic movements

message: Shouldn't it be nastic movement (singular)? Richard001 (talk) 06:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Oxalis Triangularis Photonasty Timelapse.ogv will be appearing as picture of the day on February 27, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-02-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 22:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Oxalis Triangularis Photonasty Timelapse.ogv]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: This article doesn't explicitly state that nastic movements are a botanical feature; it is only clear through the image and descriptions of plant movement, and the fact that it is listed as a botanical stub. Treeturtle81 (talk) 12:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to plants / botany 

message: Nyctinastic
Haptonastic
Hydronastics
Chemonastic  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.184.98.82 (talk) 21:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of Nastic Response 

message: Is chemonastic not also a term that could be applied to non-movement responses such as changing color or surface coating. Examples being French Hydrangeas or Pitcher plants. 131.204.254.84 (talk) 04:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Movement vs Color or Surface changes

message: "non-directional responses to stimuli” then “movement .. towards the source of light" 194.207.86.26 (talk) 08:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Directional or not?
Talk:Felipe (footballer, born February 1984)

message: http://www.futebolpaulista.com.br/competicao.php?page=2&ano=2008
After reading the match report, he only missed round 11 and 12 of the state league. Matthew_hk tc 10:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.futebolpaulista.com.br/competicao.php?page=2&ano=2007 He played every game for Bragantino at 2007 Campeonato Paulista. Matthew_hk tc 11:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 & 2008 games in state league
Talk:Leandro Lima (footballer)

message: This gentleman took part in 2007 FIFA U20 World Cup. Was he really born in 1985 or is this an error?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.62.235 (talk) 09:19, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Nuclear power in the United Kingdom

message: I'm troubled by the overlap of content with Template:Scottish energy and this.  I certainly don't think we should have to maintain a list of nuclear plants on both templates, but this could be helpful example of how to organize 'by country' energy articles for big superpowers.  Any good ideas out there? -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 21:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Following the EDF proposals for Hinkley Point C & Sizewell C European Pressurized Reactor (EPR)s, when should these be added to the template?— Rod talk 16:14, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be inclined to wait until they are authorised (by NII?), or perhaps construction starts. Just mention them from their sister stations and in a new section (or table) of :Nuclear power in the United Kingdom until then?  I can envisage significant changes and cancellations prior to that. (e.g Oldbury has both AP1000 and EPR "proposed" so far.) Rwendland (talk) 18:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  EDF proposals for Hinkley Point C & Sizewell C 

message: We don't normally use flags for decoration per WP:MOSFLAG. Is there a special reason why having a tiny Union Jack on this template will help our readers? --John (talk) 05:54, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest I don't feel that strongly about this either way. The flag does help to identify the template as a "national" template and in my view looks appealing. Also if one looks at, for example, national templates for China one will see that a high proportion have national flags. Rangoon11 (talk) 12:55, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if you don't feel that strongly about it, WP:MOSFLAG guidance should be followed as it seems to represent quite a strong historical consensus against using flags for decorations. If there are other templates that use flags this way they should also be adjusted. I haven't seen many others which still have flags. --John (talk) 16:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag
Talk:Scafells

message: Who uses the ugly term 'the Scafells'? If not suitably referenced, can we delete this article?  cheers Geopersona (talk) 07:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Both questions still stand . . . .  Geopersona (talk) 21:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scafells? 

message: To describe these hills as a caldera is to invite misunderstanding. The current form of these hills has little to do with the volcanism of which the caldera was a part back in the Palaeozoic. Geopersona (talk) 07:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mountain type
Talk:Manfred Schmid

message: Manfred Schmidt seems to redirect here, which it shouldn't do IMO. Manfred Schmidt is a cartoonist, and the creator of Nick Knatterton Kankkis (talk) 23:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Margaret Audley, Duchess of Norfolk

message: Nearly all nonwiki sites and printed resources concerning this lady use her family or maiden name. For posterity and identity I believe Wiki should conform to the same. I have seen many other Wiki examples of using the married name and I realize that it was indeed contemporary etiquette and understand the argument that Wiki is not intended as a genealogical database but many peers are notable solely on who they were, who they came from, and who, if any, they brought into the world. Articles such as this one Margaret Audley, Duchess of Norfolk are constantly redirected or moved to one where the married name is used. Again, in most cases, I believe it would be prudent for Wiki to use the family or maiden name. Daytrivia (talk) 03:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family name 

message: Hello @Sbishop I was looking at the correction you made to an anonymous user who posted about Margaret Audley's religion and to my knowledge, she was Catholic. Yes, Thomas Audley could have been a follower of the Anglican reform, but Margaret was Catholic and one of the most visible proofs is the fact that the Dispensation had to be requested from the Roman Holy See to validate her marriage to Thomas Howard. Leito.Cmj (talk) 22:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Dispensation was requested by Howard, yes, and for this he sent his lawyers to Rome, but it was to marry her based on Catholic Canon Law. Leito.Cmj (talk) 22:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but that doesn't prove she was herself Catholic. As this was in the reign of Mary I, they had no option but to be married using Catholic rites, and so needed to get the dispensation - they could hardly be married as Protestants while Mary was on the throne. Once Mary died that all changed. Sbishop (talk) 08:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. Well, she will have been a Protestant, disguised as a Catholic so as not to attract attention in the government of Queen Mary, but Howard yes was a Catholic and that is more than proven. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he certainly was, but there is no actual evidence that she was - and her family background suggests that she probably wasn't. The reality is that she probably just did what was nececessary at the time, whatever that might have been during her years of growing up.Sbishop (talk) 11:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello @Sbishop, regarding the last correction: if the inhabitants of Framlingham hid their objects in the Church it was because of the fear that the rebellion of 1745 would reach that area, but it is only an oral tradition not supported by archives and historical sources and very good to correct me that. Leito.Cmj (talk) 16:43, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections
Talk:Marie Novello

message: Somebody appended the "neutrality disputed" banner to this article without further elaboration.  Anybody care to point out the issues with a bit more specificity? Drhoehl (talk) 02:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The template explicitly refers to the article's talk page, and there is no substantiation on this page, so I think it's appropriate to remove that template. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's been better than two months now, and nobody else has offered comment; I've therefore removed the tag. Drhoehl (talk) 02:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Disputed? 
Talk:York Cold War Bunker

message: I've removed the notibility banner as there are now two references for the article and its scheduled monument status would adds to the notibility shown in the references.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaly99 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notibility

message: I would like to propose this article be merged into the Acomb main article, as reference to this bunker has been added there as well.  Opinions anyone? Rimmer1993 (talk) 16:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally prefer to keep separate articles rather than merge in to the location article. You can always link out to it from the article page. Keith D (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose merge
Talk:Mark Dent-Brocklehurst

message: There is no such thing. This will need clarification and a reference, else deleting ROxBo 22:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Self induced heart attack?
Talk:Julie Etchingham

message: I notice the caption on the image says "Etchingham on location for ITV News in June 2007". Wasn't she still working for Sky News then? Any thoughts? TheRetroGuy (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image caption 
Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Asperger syndrome/archive3

message: * A Kiwi's request to remove "senseless clutter".
* Zeraeph removed A Kiwi text, including her Strong Keep
* A Kiwi responded didn't expect you to use a meat cleaver. :o))Yeah, I'd like to see the good stuff put back in, even if I've said it better since. Makes my "strong keep" now look like a rather shallow knee-jerk opinion without any basis.
* I restored A Kiwi's text and Strong Keep and urged use of talk page.
* Zeraeph deleeted again.
Refactored text removed to Wikipedia:Featured article review/Asperger syndrome/special archive.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also preserved here Wikipedia:Featured article review/Asperger syndrome/special archive‎ as explained . --Zeraeph 21:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Refactored page
Talk:Matthew Strachan

message: I'm having doubts as to the validity of Matthew's death. As of this comment, it is only being reported by tabloids, and only by ones discouraged by Wikipedians from being used as sources. See Metro 1 2 3, The Sun 1, 2, 3. The jury seems to be out on the reliability of The Mirror. I'm having a difficult time finding a non-tabloid source reporting this information with independent confirmation. I thought it may be worth mentioning. GSK (talk • edits) 15:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the Dirk Maggs tweet in The Sun's article doesn't appear to exist. I couldn't find it, only articles repeating The Sun's line. GSK (talk • edits) 15:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been informed by a friend that the tweet does exist, but if it's accurate, then we've got the wrong date of death. There are still no reliable sources I'm able to find. GSK (talk • edits) 15:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen that tweet. I don't know how Twitter does its timestamps, but for me (in BST zone) it shows as 11:34 pm on 15 September. MIDI (talk) 17:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

text: BBC has confirmed his death. GSK (talk • edits) 18:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Here's an updated newspaper (tabloid) link citing some more details https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11042877/Who-Wants-Millionaire-composer-Matthew-Strachan-leaves-1-5million-will.html - in case you're interested 187.135.186.70 (talk) 02:48, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Maurice FitzGerald, 14th Knight of Kerry

message: The article says that "Maurice became a Member of Parliament and Deputy Lieutenant of Kerry." However, there is no reference to this in the catalogue details of PRONI reference T/3075 and 'Personal Family history' is not of course a reliable source. Biographies of Members of the Irish Parliament 1692-1800 does not have an entry for him. I will therefore delete any reference to his being an MP. If anyone has any evidence that he was, please provide a citation, including details of which constituency he represented. Alekksandr (talk) 21:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: MP?
Talk:Mauricio Isla

message: Is there a reason for his double surname? Were his aprents already close relatives, or did he double one parent's name due to the other being absent? Is this common in Spanish-speaking countries?--MartinUK (talk) 21:59, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it's too late to answer, but whatever. At least in Chile, when the father is absent, the newborn child usually gets his mother's surname as both paternal and maternal surnames. That's Isla's case. He met his biological father later, however he never switched his surname to his father's. 201.239.157.92 (talk) 17:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Always used to call him 'Boutros Boutros' when I had him in my Football Manager team, although curiously in that he was a central midfielder and nothing else - very good as a box-to-box player IIRC.--MartinUK (talk) 11:43, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Isla Isla

message: There's been a pile of messing about on this article in the last couple of days - so I reverted to the last-good version, and put a week of autoconfirmed on it under WP:BLP - David Gerard (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1 week autoconfirmed against vandals