lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CHA2DS2–VASc score

message: hi all.
Looking ath algorithm, it looks like you must have a systolic blood pressure > 160 to qualify and score a point.
This is not the case. the CHADS2 scoringin system is to include a point for anyone with hypertension
which defitionally is now a BP >140/90 or in Diabetics or kidney patients 130>180
Thisuser (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This is not accurate info based on the 2006 ACC recommendations and should not be used. I would recommend going directly to ACC.org and looking at the newest recommendations. Specifically, any pt with a CHADS score of 2 should be on a/c, and not asa alone. thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.176.151.7 (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you explain your point more? Also, were you referring to the previous comment or the present form of the article? Thanks. --Bob K31416 (talk) 23:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Nope. It doesn't consider specific contraindications at all.
Regarding the article, the new CHA2DS2-VASc mentions thromboembolism under S2. Is that talking about arterial, or venous too? (I can't find any useful information about this). 118.90.14.22 (talk) 11:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  not accurate 

message: the table with risk for stroke is nice but risk reduction with anticoag should be added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.40.12.37 (talk) 17:13, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  add stroke risk reduction with anticoag 

message: Hi, I was wondering if someone had a source for "Note that female gender only scores one point if the patient has at least one other risk factor, and does not score any points in isolation." I couldn't find it in any of the source material or my own searches.
Yogasund (talk) 06:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Five Corners, Newark

message: ... even though there already are many old buildings in Newark, such that the loss of 1 old one from the mid-19th century would not even be significant ...
... yet the old "Y" building in Thunder Bay (one of the first YMCA buildings constructed in Canada), built in 1910 -- in a city that has very few buildings over 100 years old to begin with -- was allowed to be demolished  last Fall?
Oh wait, I know:  because Toronto controls everything in Canada, and Toronto wants to see 'civilization' destroyed everywhere in Canada that is not in the Quebec-Windsor urban corridor.
Including Thunder Bay.
That's why.
--Atikokan (talk) 02:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'd like to know why a church from 1874 in Newark can survive ...
Template talk:Educational assignment

message: Looks like that's an accidental(?) but pointless fork of this one. I think it can be replaced with a call to this template.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  09:08, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Does this need to be raised at WP:TFD? — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:Course assignment]] 

message: Functionality to link to external sites, namely dashboard, like ? I tried to do this but the link is broken, see . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Interwiki links work. Special:Interwiki says outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org is wmfdashboard: so you can use that. Are assignments ever on sites not run by the Wikimedia Foundation? PrimeHunter (talk) 07:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging  - if the above sorts it out, great! If not, I've written a small module which will just perform a rudimentary check on whether a param is a protocol'd URL or not, and return appropriately, which could be included here. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 10:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  It seems confusing to use the same name as  which does something different. And we already have  which detects if the argument is already linked. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, brilliant - I didn't know about , sorry! Although, having said that, doing the entire thing in wikitext there hurts my head to look at  I might suggest that we turn that template into a module call, but I'll move it away from Autolink anyway, for the reason you've pointed out. Cheers! Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 11:13, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

text:  re "re assignments ever on sites not run by the Wikimedia Foundation?" It is probably rare, but possible. Not that I can think of any example right now, these days the dashboard is all the vogue. For now I will use the interwiki link, thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we add
Talk:KLBM

message: Chief Engineer: Warren Curry
Station Manager: Kenneth L. Lillard
Sales Staff: Beverly, Sally Cunliffe, George Clymer, Mike Hansel
News Director: Bob Maszk
Air Personalities: Billy Van, Gary Allen, Mike Hansel, Jeni Tarkus, Warren Curry, Johnny D.'s House Of Fun, George Clymer And Company, John Chase, Scott Bradfield, Steve Harsin, Ken Kennedy, Ken Lillard, Doug Johnson, Ron Ramey.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.35.207.75 (talk) 05:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staff (historical-1970's-1980's) 
Talk:Kill Van Kull

message: According to the USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS), the feature name is "Kill Van Kull", not "Kill van Kull".  See Feature ID# 877560. — QuicksilverT @ 21:27, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 
Talk:Kingston Bridge (Kingston, New Jersey)

message: Two minor quibbles: Route 27 does not run over the 1798 bridge, it runs over a modern reinforced concrete bridge next to it. The road that runs over the old bridge is named "Old Lincoln Highway", according to Google Maps (and my recollection). I believe it's a dead end, that only leads to the old mill. Second, the coordinates are off by 1500 feet or so, at least according to Google Maps' satellite photos. A lat/long marker placed near the middle of the photo of the bridge reads 40.373752, -74.620266 (that is, 40°22′26″N 74°37′13″W). jeremyleader (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Landing Creek (New Jersey)

message: I'm not sure how to link to a specific area on the "National Map" that is now reference 1, but the link as given now doesn't straightforwardly lead to the data it's cited for, instead showing a map of the whole lower 48 states. The WebCite archive of it can't even be zoomed in to see the creek -- it just shows the text "TNM Viewer Loading..." on an otherwise solid blue page -- so I am deleting that. - LaetusStudiis (talk) 02:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "National Map" link
Talk:Lubbers Run

message: This is a river.  There are many river stubs on Wikipedia. There are many smaller rivers/creeks/streams with articles on wikipedia that are stand alone.  Every other Sussex County river/creek/stream has their own article, so should Lubbers Run. Name other SC river/creek/stream or lakes or mountains or other geological/geographic feature that has been so treated. Just because you think there's more information on Byram Township's article (not much more) doesn't mean you should redirect it.  Most importantly, the river doesn't just flow in Byram Township--a portion of it is in Sparta Township. I've added information on rivers in a section of the Sussex County, New Jersey article--but have no design on redirecting all river articles to the SC article. This as a stub is better than being a mere sentence lost or obscured in the Byram article. Expand the article to make it a respectable small river article--like many many many others. --ColonelHenry (talk) 15:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not redirect - Why Redirect to Byram Township, NJ was reverted
Talk:Trident Cars

message: I read here that the project had died but this was back in 2004. Has it been resurrected or should the article mention that it is dead? http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?f=23&t=136416  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterBennettfriedpies (talk • contribs) 08:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trident Iceni
Talk:Manumuskin River

message: What is the origin of this name? Badagnani (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:Marven Gardens

message: Can some one fix the reference list at the bottom of the page? Thanks! Wordtobigbirds (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

message: Somehow the putting in Category:Monopoly seems overwhelmingly obvious to me - all the other properties seem like reasonable names, but "Marvin Gardens" really raised a question mark whenever I played.
Plus all the other properties are actually in Atlantic City, whereas this one is not.  Willing to hear what others say.  Smallbones (talk) 02:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Put monopoly category back in - notified Bearcat
Talk:Murray Hill, New Jersey

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  rbrwr± 23:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ramanujan's sum

message: Although i can not be 100 % sure, i think Ramanujan sum is also related to circle method to evaluate (n--> oo) the integrals:
 \int_{0}^{1}dxf(x)e^{inx} 
involved in circle method 
--85.85.100.144 18:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I think the 2nd formula under the generating function section should be
written without the factor n^r in the denominator. The Titchmarsh
book Theory of the Riemann zeta-function shows only \sigma_{1-r}(n)/\zeta(r). R. J. Mathar (talk) 16:34, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think both representations are correct. The article gives the function in terms of \sigma_{r-1}(n), Titchmarsh in terms of \sigma_{1-r}(n). The two are related but unequal, in general. Rwb001 (talk) 09:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dirichlet g.f.

message: I think the entries  c_{4}(12)  to  c_{4}(20)  may have the incorrect signs. Note for instance that the 4th row of the table does not have period 4, as I think it should.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwb001 (talk • contribs) 09:14, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh? row 4 is 0,-2,0,2, over and over. Compare to rows 8 and 16 - Virginia-American (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

text: The pattern breaks down after  c_{4}(10)=-2  (which is correct, I think). Then  c_{4}(12)  is also given as -2. Should be +2, I think. Rwb001 (talk) 09:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: D'uh, you're right! I'll fix it. - Virginia-American (talk) 11:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks OK now. Thanks! Rwb001 (talk) 08:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Table of values
Talk:Midway High School

message: Is this page new?--Angel David 18:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so. Haha I hate to admit it but I enjoyed Texas Cheer Moms --Banime (talk) 21:44, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have modified several areas of this article to bring current and to provide much needed verification. I added a better infobox along with an updated athletics section and new state title section. Indyjrg1762 (talk) 08:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Partial Rewrite

message: I wondered if Ryan Harlan should be included in this section because he does not have a Wikipedia article in his name. I though this was necessary to establish notability? Please let me know. Thanks!--Fraulein451 (talk) 02:33, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni section
Talk:New Jersey Peninsula

message: The "New Jersey peninsula" doesn't deserve its own article, especially if "New Jersey itself is a peninsula". There were two earlier proposals to merge this page, but they got deleted by IP users in these edits:  . This current article is inappropriate and redundant. --Apollo1758 (talk) 22:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge to Geography of New Jersey
Talk:Palmer Square

message: 'was delayed until 1936 by the depression" 
Whose?
Perhaps this needs a link to the Great Depression. It's usually an older generation who refer to 'the depression' and understand what is meant.
For younger persons, 'depression' signifies an urge to create and post sulky memes about how 'dead' they feel inside.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:2213:E100:E06D:E150:574B:F455 (talk) 03:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depression?
Talk:Louise English

message: I've reverted Louiseenglishfancentre last round of reverts for the following reasons;
* The Louiseenglishfancentre's edits are not neutral and appear to be very much like a fanpage.  Content like "wowing the audience" is not encyclopedic or neutral.
* Many of Louiseenglishfancentre's cites are to what appear to be their own personal fansite, which may (or may not) be endorsed by the article's subject.  This presents a conflict of interest and an issue of primary sources.
* Louiseenglishfancentre is reverting without supplying any reason for removing edits by another user.  This looks like a case of Ownership.
Could Louiseenglishfancentre explain their thinking, and also bear in mind that they are very close to breaching Wikipedia policy on edit warring.  Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: The following links now only lead to the message: "This video has been removed by the user."
Archived here for reference.
* Louise English in TBHS - Pt.1
* Louise English in TBHS - Pt.5
* Benny Hill's Angels - Louise English on the Cruise Liner
86.25.121.172 (talk) 19:34, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed non-working YouTube links 

message: Can we have date-of-birth, please, as standard on Wiki pages. Valetude (talk) 07:21, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  D.o.b., please
Talk:NanoPutian

message: Portmanteau of Lilliputian and Nano-? --MacRusgail 18:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. The original JOC paper mentions it as such. DMacks (talk) 22:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name 

message: These molecules apparently have been synthesized. Is there any information available about their chemical properties? What is their normal STP state? What do they react with? Toxicity? and so on. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical properties
Talk:Radioisotope renography

message: As per WP:Naming, abbreviations are permitted where "almost exclusively known only by its abbreviation and is widely known and used in that form". As such name used is not "Mag 3" but in capitals and with no separating space, i.e. "MAG3" (whilst technically the substance used is Tc-99m MAG3, it is only ever refered to by most doctors as a MAG3 scan). I shall therefore move the article from :Mag 3 scan to :MAG3 scan. David Ruben  Talk  03:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: It is not written how the scan works technically, i.e.: How can the progress through the renal system be tracked with a gamma camera?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.176.0.54 (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Function

message: The glomerular filtration rate cannot be measured. MAG3 clearance, tubular secretion or renal excretion are completely different from GFR. As a result of radioisotope renography you may get the ratio of radioactivity between both kidneys; their sum always is 100 %. You have to know patient's GFR in advance. For example: Patient's GFR is 50 ml/min. The right:left ratio is 60:40. Then the GFR of the right kidney is 30 ml/min and the GFR of the left kidney is 20 ml/min. --Dr. Hartwig Raeder (talk) 19:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  GFR cannot be measured
Talk:Mechanomyogram

message: This article should be titled under Mechanomyography and source a link from Mechanomyogram.  (Note that this is the case for Electromyography which redirects from Electromyogram)  It is currently reversed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.105.103.2 (talk) 18:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page appears to be a 'fork' or attributed copy of Phonomyography which pre-dates it, by a few days, created  As of now the four refs here are exactly the same, even to punctuation as the same four on that page. Much content exactly the same as well. Created in 2 edits by an author who has not edited since. 220 of Borg 02:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Update to above, this page was created unsourced using unique text, by  on 2007-03-07 with  edit but the 'history' section and sources are a direct copy from Phonomyography. This edit  @ 12:52, 17 November 2009‎ is when the un-attributed copying occurred. 220 of Borg 02:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fork/ copy of 'Phonomyography'
Talk:Toms Canyon impact crater

message: The article lacks any inline citations and has only one source as its "bibliography." Furthermore, that source identifies this site as a "probable" impact crater, but the article describes it as definitely an impact crater. Wikipedia's main article describes it as a possible impact crater.Jtcarpet (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I've adjusted the text to show that it is only "probable".Titus III (talk) 06:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of citations and incorrect info
Talk:WAML (AM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a railway line in the United Kingdom is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the railway line. - Dravecky (talk) 09:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A third meaning for "WAML" was found and added to the disambiguation page so I am no longer supporting its deletion in any way. - Dravecky (talk) 11:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Ultimate issue

message: This page is largely incorrect. The concept of "ultimate issue" is not limited to expert testimony, and the rule against expert testimony as to ultimate issues of mental states is an exception to the broader rule that expert witnesses (and others) are free to testify as to all ultimate issues except mental states. This article treats the exception as the entire rule.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:1301:A3EE:59:CEBD:143E:5C00 (talk) 17:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this concept restricted to US law or does it apply to other systems? Itsmejudith (talk) 13:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  World view? 

message: The language of the last two sentences of the Conclusions section seems awfully non-neutral to me.  The article given for the section's reference is unabashedly opposed to Rule 704(b).  Is this appropriate, or should there be some countering statements from a source which supports Rule 704(b)?  Or should all the Rule 704(b) stuff be in its own article (e.g. does its presence here violate WP:Coatrack)?
(Not that I have any personal view either way regarding 704(b), as I had never even heard of it until encountering this article...)  John Darrow (talk) 22:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the last two sentences in Conclusions, per your objection, and removed the POV tag accordingly. —Mattisse (Talk) 21:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV?  Coatrack? 

message: The article cited does not say that the testimony excluded at the trial (which it specifically states was excluded on the basis of rule 403, not 704) would be allowed in if the trial were held today. It states only that 704b would not exclude that evidence. The article says nothing at all about whether the testimony would be excluded today, because any such conclusion would depend on whether the interpretation of 403 has changed, which is not addressed in the article.Rose bartram (talk) 01:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: McDonald section
Talk:Pissouri

message: Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products, or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, will be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Spam. 
why does the pissouri portal keep re appearing?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickkendall (talk • contribs) 19:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Sandra Bolden Cunningham

message: Re: Motor vehicle collision and driving while intoxicated criminal charges found on released bodycam footage, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96iQRq9w8jc&ab_channel=NJ.comNJ.comVerified
Is this the same person? I'm on the other side of the world so I have no idea, might be helpful to someone there. 124.190.192.20 (talk) 04:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Yes, that is the same person. Citation has been added under "Personal Life" with a link/reference to the body camera footage. DirkDouse (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the same person?
Talk:South West Delhi district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 13:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
File talk:Notophthalmus viridescens edit.jpg

message: Following authors comments at the lend of the image's FPC nomination page and further discussion at the FPC talk page, here are three versions for comparison:
I'm not at all sure my edit (the third one) is any more accurate than the original.. the CC shift is about the same as you'd expect with a warm Wratten 81C filter removed, if that makes any sense. The tree and old needles look more natural to me, but the author's thoughts in particular would  obviously be welcome. --mikaultalk 19:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could someone format this better? I'm in a mad rush.. --mikaultalk 19:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chawri Bazar

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: This page almost seems to be promotional content but i'm on the fence. I see a few too many images and a few too few encyclopaedic content. It seems this would fit better on the sibling project Wikivoyage. 56independent (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional Content
Talk:Phineas C. Dummer

message: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Phineas+C.+Dummer%22&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS240US240
   Dlohcierekim Deleted? 04:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible sources