Talk:Muqattaʿat

message: I have read that the fifth Imam composed a commentary on the disconnected letters, and that he performed arithmetic on their numerical values; can anyone add to this? J S Ayer (talk) 14:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muhammad-Baqir 

message: In the Arabic language, these letters are written together like a word, but each letter is pronounced separately. None of these combinations actually form a meaningful Arabic word.
alam? (like surat al fil) --99.245.206.188 (talk) 03:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  meaningful word 

message: Please tell us: which letter (and where) and what the difference in "style" is
or delete the mysterious statement.--85.178.69.199 (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  One letter is written in two styles. [Refer 19:01 and 20:01] 

message: I've no problem with having a paragraph on Christoph Luxenberg's theory but only if someone actually describes what it is. Since no explanation of the theory is given on the page such a link should not be presented as a part of the body of the article. M-Henry (talk) 23:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Research 

message: Peace be upon you all,
God Willing I intend adding following within the "Modern Research" section, further substantiating the understanding on Muqatta'at as presented by Dr. Rashad Khalifa. 
1. The total of the 29 sura numbers where the Quranic Initials occur is 2+3+7+...+50+68 = 822, and 822+14 (14 sets of initials) equals 836, or 19 x 44.
2. 14 different Arabic letters, form 14 different sets of "Quranic Initials" (such as A.L.M. of 2:1), and prefix 29 suras. These numbers add up to 14+14+29 = 57= 19 x 3.
3. Between the first initialed sura (Sura 2) and the last initialed sura (Sura 68) there are 38 un-initialed suras 19 x 2.
4. Between the first and last initialed sura there are 19 sets of alternating “initialed” and “uninitialed” suras.
Let me know if there are any concerns, else will include these in another 36 hours time God Willing.
(DukhanSmoke (talk) 14:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: > DukhanSmoke ... Yes, there are indeed some interesting and quite impressive examples, in particular - 
Sura "Al-Qalam" (no. 68) [carrying the Qur'anic initial "Noon", which occurs exactly 133 (=19 x 7) times in that sura], and
Sura "Al-Shoora" (no. 42) [carrying the Qur'anic initial "Qaf", which occurs exactly 57 (=19 x 3) times in that sura]. --DLMcN (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematical Structure based on 19 [74:30] within Initialled Suras (Chapter with Muqatta'at) 

message: Who put the section linking alif-lam-mim to aum? It cites no sources and sounds rather like pure opinion. I'm removing the section unless anyone can give a good reason why it should stay.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.48.57.148 (talk) 01:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last section 

message: From the article:
"This apparent lack of inquisitiveness is cited as proof that such abbreviations were well known to the Arabs of the time and were in vogue long before the advent of Islam."
We have no other texts from the time that uses or mentions these abbreviations, so that cannot be true.
There are only two likely explanations:
1) The letters were taken to be mystic names / codes or something similar and the followers were afraid to question them, perhaps fearing such questions to betray lack of faith on their part. Or perhaps they simply didn't care, much the same as most people react to e.g. buzzwords nowadays.
2) The letters weren't in the Koran when it was originally authored and only inserted later when it was transcribed. Note that we don't have an original Koran.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.81.0 (talk) 01:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Muqattaʿat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928093611/http://www.hurqalya.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/03-Biblical-islam-BBst/1844.HTM to http://www.hurqalya.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/03-Biblical-islam-BBst/1844.HTM
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Muqattaʿat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626143638/http://www.iiu.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/downloads/academics/short_cv/fll/eng-male/ahsan-ur-rehman.pdf to http://www.iiu.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/downloads/academics/short_cv/fll/eng-male/ahsan-ur-rehman.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: It is mentioned that these can be references to names of God, but in one case, Taha is a recognized name of Prophet Muhammad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:6A00:6C80:C9CA:8690:39DA:FEF (talk) 03:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taha name of Prophet Muhammad 

message: Would these be better translated as "disjointed" or "disjoined"? Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:20c0:f600:ed23:89b:cef9:7c07 (talk • contribs) 
: It isn't a matter of translation, rather one of description. The intention is to say that the letters are written separated from the text that follows. For this meaning, "disjoined" is correct and "disjointed" is incorrect. I'm not entirely happy about this because "disjoined" is a rare word that many readers will not know. Zerotalk 03:58, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: Hocuspocus abracadabra? Grow up, is any conjecture thought up by some crypto polemicist added now? Go back to the catholic encyclopedia. 128.206.16.115 (talk) 04:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chants