Talk:God (Tori Amos song)

message: :Image:Toriamosgod.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Toriamosgod.jpg

message: "American radio was very hesitant to play the song because of its heavy use of guitars"? Sorry, I've heard of all sorts of reasons why certain songs are not played on the radio, but I've NEVER heard of a song not being played because it was too guitar-heavy. That's just stupid. By that logic, almost no major hard-rock band (Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, The Who, etc) in the past 40 years would've gotten big, because their music are all about heavy guitar sounds. I don't know who wrote this article, but whoever did it did a rather poor job. Where on earth do they get their conclusions? Has it ever occurred that the reason "God" wasn't played was because of the rather touchy lyrics that would almost certainly set off religious groups who in turn would protest the stations that played the song? 24.189.90.68 (talk) 02:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why it wasn't played by commercial radio 

message: The following unreferenced details were removed after having been challenged as  original research since November 2009:
:The song was Amos' response to patriarchy and the repression of women through religion. Lyrically it was heavily confrontational of male-deity headed religions, with lyrics like "God, sometimes you just don't come through/Do you need a woman to look after you?" American radio was very hesitant to play the song because of its heavy use of guitars, so a promotional CD was released in the USA with two commercially unavailable mixes of the song: the "No Guitar" mix and the "Some Guitar" mix. The B-sides to the American release included Amos' reworking of the traditional song "Home on the Range", with new lyrics reflecting her Cherokee heritage, as well as a two-song instrumental piano suite. An American cassette single featured the b-side "Sister Janet".
Feel free to reinstate if you are able to document a reference.  67.101.6.160 (talk) 18:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed details challenged as OR since November 2009 

message: In view of the song's title, should this article have an analysis of the deep theological meaning of the song?Vorbee (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Theological meaning

message: This article has been put in the category "Songs critical of religion" but the article does not really explain why this song is critical of religion. Vorbee (talk) 08:12, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Songs critical of religion