lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ponyboy Curtis

message: Everything here can probably be added to the plot summary for the Outsiders. 156.63.85.15 18:55, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It's a (poor) re-hash of the novel synopsis. Rufous 16:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Regardless of the quality of writing, the character of Ponyboy is more than adequately explored in the novel summary.  This just repeats the same information.  Henchperson 04:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Ponyboy Michael Curtis → Ponyboy Curtis — Should use more common name per WP:NC.  From only watching the film, I didn't even know his real name was Michael. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Support. As I recall from the book, "Ponyboy" was his real first name, just as "Sodapop" was his brother's. The other given names I believe were middle names; but the unusual monikers were real (altho' I wonder about the reality of registering one's child in the early 1950's under the names "Ponyboy" and "Sodapop".) --SigPig 06:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Add any additional comments:
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. Vegaswikian 03:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Whenever I revert this, it has some example image placed, and it says I'M IN LOVE WITH CHEESE There, yet it doesn't seem anyone has edited it after the page refreshed from the revert. Someone has been messing with the {{}} things, I think. SBKT 22:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd... 

message: First we had the novel, then the film, then the TV show and now a stage musical. This character is very significant enough across all these portrayals to have an article that maybe we should start one now, especially when reviews of the Broadway production begin to come in that describe how Brody Grant portrays the character on stage compared to C. Thomas Howell in the film and Jay R. Ferguson in the TV show. Same thing should be said about Johnny Cade given that was Ralph Macchio's breakthrough role. HM2021 (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make an article?
Talk:Books of Jeu

message: A couple of remarks by Philo Judaeus concerning the Therapeutae in "The Contemplative Life" might be apropos? --Wetman 23:47, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Paschal Homily

message: Not only should this be moved to Wikisource, but it's mistitled.  Most of those who use this text liturgically do not refer to the holiday as Easter, but as Pascha.  It is normally called the "Paschal Homily", not the "Easter Homily".  Further, it the name of the preacher to whom it is attributed is required since it's not about Paschal homilies in general but about a specific one. Csernica 23:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled]
Talk:Panachikad Temple

message: Is this spelled "Panachikad" or "Panachikkad"? Both come up on Google with the same frequency. Also, a few of the sites I found on Google call this the "Saraswathy Temple at Panachikad" or "Panachikkad Saraswathy Temple" (or something along those lines). Is that a more appropriate name for this? -Eisnel 23:58, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ghostbusters

message: Hello everyone. I am new to Wikipedia. I am a huge Ghostbusters fan and would like to contribute to this topic. Under "Cast and Characters,” I would like to add details about how the studio treated Ernie Hudson after filming was completed, specifically, the removal of his image from marketing material. I believe this contribution is relevant and will add to the information on the page about Hudson’s role getting reduced before shooting began. I will be sure to cite all sources, which include an interview with Ernie Hudson on the Howard Stern Show and other publications. Thank you for your consideration. Jwhasu004 (talk) 07:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Jwhaus004, thank you for your additions. Per my previous comments, the article does cover both how Hudson's role was diminished because he wasn't as big a name as Murray and that he appreciates the fan support while being upset at his marginalized role. With or without sourcing, the commentary on his inclusion on posters is not appropriate. Saying that we should include it because he portrayed a Ghostbuster and that is the title of the film is like arguing Shia LaBouef shouldn't be on the Transformers poster because he isn't a Transformer. He wasn't a known name at the time, he did not even receive billing on the poster so his complaint about not being on the poster is a personal issue and not really something that can be laid at the feet of the studio when he is being compared to Aykroyd, Murray, and Ramis who were all vastly more successful at that point in time. You could maybe mention it on Hudson's page because it is his personal complaint but I don't believe it belongs in this article beyond what is already covered about him and his feelings. Thank you Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 10:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ernie Hudson Comments
Talk:John Legend

message: Contrary to Mashable's article and Chrissy Tiegen's tweet John Legend is not the youngest person to achieve the EGOT. That is still Robert Lopez. Lopez was born February 23, 1975 and completed the EGOT on March 2, 2014 meaning he was 39 years and 2 weeks old at the time. John was born December 28, 1978 and completed the EGOT on September 9, 2018 meaning he was 39 years, 9 months, and 2 weeks old at the time. Mathematically Lopez was younger at the time he completed the EGOT.
BBC Article confirms this in the beginning: https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-45470740  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.206.157.184 (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT The Youngest EGOT 

message: Is he Chinese or Korean? Looks like either. But my guess would be for first.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:463B:5200:7176:2967:C98:542 (talk) 08:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: The article needs more inline citations and has been tagged accordingly. SunCrow (talk) 01:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: There is currently an RFC posted which affects content in this article. Please see: Talk:Chrissy Teigen#RFC. Thank you! Elizium23 (talk) 14:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC at Chrissy Teigen 

message: Please use pronouns to refer to Legend. The article is littered with his surname, which is not standard practice. Elizium23 (talk) 20:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please use pronouns
Talk:AMule

message: Too many edits, made a wrong edit myself so i propose to come up with a good one here and then past it to the article... :Leuk he 15:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  line. Like eMule, aMule is free software released under the GNU General Public License. .

message: We should include a screenshot of the current version of aMule AND it must show characteristic aMule features such as GeoIP. Using any screenshot of aMule should not be acceptable. VShaka (talk) 17:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  aMule screenshot 

message: For WikiProjects without a formal A-Class review process, the proposal to promote to A-Class should be made on the article's talk page and supported there by two uninvolved editors, with no significant opposes. The review should also be noted on the discussion page. Since I see no evidence of this, and the fact that the article does not cite a single source, I am reassessing it to Stub-class. decltype (talk) 06:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A-Class 

message: Why Amule is Unmaintained for Wikipedia (not updated since september 2011) and Emule is still active? (The last version was released April 2010)? 79.47.47.239 (talk) 12:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amule Unmaintained 

message: Do we have to say "According to the aMule official FAQ"? --Mortense (talk) 13:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implied by sources?
Talk:Covenant/to do

message: *Move text of a theological nature to Covenant theology, as Covenant (theological term) is now a redirect to that article.  It has a section on the definition of covenant here.
*Find out what categories this article falls under.
*Correct the definition - there are fundamental flaws.
*Legal context section - review and tidy up stray words at the end. (121.44.236.22 13:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Homeboys in Outer Space

message: i think this is worthy of an entry.
-j.
I watched all of the episodes of homeboys and thought it was tongue in cheek funny!!I don't see why it was exploitation of anyone-no more so than dukes of hazzard or hundreds of other shows.I really liked the computer who had a personality and in fact I was trying to find out if I can buy all the episodes on dvd- everybody needs to lighten up.--SW
It was funny-provided it wasn't taken seriously!!
:It was pretty funny, but tbh I think any show in which black characters act 'distinctively black' to put it politely... is exploitation.
::Then In Living Color was the ultimate in blaxploitation. Val42 04:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out the controversy section since it didn't seem remotely neutral or well-written, sorry D: --74.46.205.72 (talk) 00:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zara Yaqob

message: In the onset of this article, little is done to establish Zara Yaqob in 
geography or relative to contemporaries.  Reading the article, I feel overwhelmed by a list of names. (comment by SVT Cobra, 3 May 2005)
:Wow, this is a GA? Amda Seyon I will surely pass, then. I'll try to work on this and expand it. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk • E 23:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think (seeing how this is nominated for GA (Good Article)) that the opening sentence, where most users (or readers of WP (Wikipedia)) would be inclined to start an article or biography, could stand to have less parenthetical references, and of non-English words, like nəgusä nägäst (which links to the Anglicized Emperor of Ethiopia), yes? --Knulclunk 14:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messy Starts 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. Although this article has remained essentially unchanged in the last three years, I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Its a close thing, and it is possible that I simply know so little of Ethiopian history that I am missing a lack of comprehensiveness here. Equally, sources may be scarce and this is the best that can be done, certainly the sources seem good. The article could also use some images. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 09:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps
Talk:Pilus

message: This article owns the fimbrium redirect, yet there is a fimbria/fimbriae article. Those appear, to my layperson's eye, to be the same thing. It seems like the information about fimbrium from this article should be offloaded to the fimbria article. I'm way out of my depth with biology articles (I prefer physics), so I won't mess with what's there, beyond just making it obvious that there's a seperate fimbria article. -Eisnel 00:28, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: fimbrium / fimbria / fimbriae?

message: AAAHHH! where'd that picture in this article go?! Someone please rescue it!! Adenosine | Talk 01:11, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: missing picture

message: Where in the world did a connection between pili and MreB come from? If no one can support this within a reasonable amount of time I'm going to wipe that. MicroProf 00:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And done. MicroProf 03:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MreB? 

message: It should be made clear that during conjugation DNA is not transfered through the pilus. Transfer of DNA during conjugation is an active area of research, however it is now known that it does not transfer through the pilus but rather the pilus is only used for attachment. DNA actually goes through some kind of Type IV secretion system...this much I am sure of however the details of the matter should be researched more carefully before continuing an edit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.195.18 (talk) 05:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pili Transport

message: Hello everyone,
I'm in a science communication class, and one of our assignments is to add a paragraph to a Wikipedia article on a topic that interests us. I would like to add a section to this page that looks at how presence of pili is often correlated with increased virulence in certain strains of bacteria compared with related strains. I have my proposed paragraph in my sandbox, and I'm in the process of adding my sources. I hope to make the paragraph live in a couple weeks, so if anyone would like to give me feedback before then, I'd welcome it a lot!
--Micro Nerd (talk) 06:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested New Section: Virulence 

message: subtopic. no real distinction by structual family. can use family information in the larger pilus article. Artoria2e5 🌉 06:39, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 09:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Fimbria (bacteriology)]] into [[Pilus]] 

message: Is this a typo for Immunity factors?  DlronW (talk) 13:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   "impunity factors"?
Talk:Hang on the Box

message: Stub created ca Apr 28 2005 by McDogm--McDogm 00:49, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Day of Truth

message: This is article is just not big enough to exist separately from the Alliance Defense Fund article.  I going to put a 'merge' notification on it and if there is no objection, they can be merged together and this page can redirect to Alliance Defense Fund. --Randolph 00:53, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Day of Truth is an event organised by the ADF, which is largely a legal organisation. There should be separate pages on the organisers (who have been around for eleven years before starting this event) and the event itself. Gaurav 15:21, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Day of Truth only exists in the context of the ADF. It is an event run and organized by the ADF with minimal participation by other groups. It should therefore be in their article. JoshuaZ 17:47, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the point does need some good consideration that the day of truth pretty much is run solely by the ADF, and it isn't too complicated yet. Merging it into the ADF article may provide it with some much needed material on their activities :). Homestarmy 01:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that at this point, since both pages are relatively small and lacking in content, a merge is acceptable.  Later, if/when the article(s) develop enough to merit their own pages, they could bve separated again. --Tim4christ17 08:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: However, I would only support a temporary merge - note that "Day of Silence" (another protest, counter to the "Day of Truth" merits its own article.) --Tim4christ17 08:32, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the other way around; the Day of Truth was started as a response to the Day of Silence. Jimpartame 00:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

text:  Also, the Day of Silence is much more well known and common than the day of truth, and is sponsored/run by many different groups. JoshuaZ 00:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

text:  It's also for equal rights, as opposed to the right to preach about how someone is going to hell. 67.187.112.115 02:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now that's a POV statement if I've ever heard one.  :P   Where did you get that impression, anyway?  Did you even read the article?  It said nothing about hell, merely about promoting discussion about what is (at best) a controversial topic. --Tim4christ17 18:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

text: As mentioned above, I support a temporary merge (in this case, copy current article to replace the  section in the ADF page right now) until someone takes the time to add significant additional information. --Tim4christ17 18:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Parapet

message: Should this link to Baluster somewhere. E.g. as used for some bridge parapets? zoney  ♣ talk 12:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it should.--Teda13 (talk) 05:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Can someone clarify for me the difference between parapet, breastwork, and balustrade? And is it necessary to have a separate article for all? Thanx, Timur lenk (talk) 08:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concepts
Talk:Theodor Kaluza

message: As far as I'm concerned, Theodor's father, Max Kaluza was in fact German (ie. he thought of himself as one). Certainly, German of Polish origin -- the name is evident. This is a common mistake to call Kaluza a Pole (in fact, `Kałuża'), but it's rather unjustified. Hence, I removed the link to `Polish physicists'. If in doubt, ask one of them :)
--83.31.171.158 21:16, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaluza's nationality 

message: It seems there is a confusion about his place of birth. The article says "Wilhelmsthal" (correctly I think), but there are/were several places of this name and the article links to the wrong ones. I think the correct one is  Wilhelmsthal, also once known as Pascheke, today called in Polish "Wyspa Pasieka" (pl.wikipedia), which is part of Oppeln/Opole (has become part of Oppeln in the late 19th century). Hope this helps.  Stan J. Klimas (talk) 04:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth
Talk:David Hahn

message: Wiki and the source state 0.404 mg/dL at death, which seems wrong. 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/alcohol-blood-level
It appears that the 0.404 might refer to percent. Alcohol at lethal levels is hundreds of mg/dL as per the link, rather than 0.4. Spunkedout (talk) 11:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 0.404 "gram percent" would mean 4.04 g/l, which makes a lot more sense 93.15.99.147 (talk) 11:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blood alcohol content
Talk:Ville

message: Bold textEssentially merely an impossibly long list. --Wetman 01:44, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The list of notable -ville cities has blossomed in the last week or two.  I've never even heard of most of these cities.  What is notable about them?  To avoid listcruft we don't need to list every -ville, just the ones that are especially large or famous, I think. Pfly 08:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not wrong but unprecise : ville and vile are from French and the Anglo-saxons spoke Old English. The lords who first used these words spoke Anglo-Norman and had more or less French origins. Your etymology between ville and vile can be considered as a popular etymology. The word that had a vulgar connotation was villain Nortmannus (talk) 17:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable -ville cities

message: Terrakinesis is manipulting the matter of earth by mind —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.54.18.100 (talk) 03:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrakinesis 

message: The former mining town of Coalville is about the only example I can think of of an industrialised English town being named in the way more familiar in the USA. There may be others, but Coalville is certainly very rare in that respect. 109.151.0.183 (talk) 02:09, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coalville
Talk:Bohus Fortress

message: I support the move. I don't think anyone has argued against it, & the move was proposed months ago. And to a degree it is moot; it has already been moved. 
But I would just like to see the old Båhus page to confirm there is no loss of content - since there was an existing page, the two needed to be integrated. Williamborg 05:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go here and use the history to see the old  versions. . / Fred-Chess 22:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Appreciate the link. Thanks - Williamborg 02:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support move 

message: I moved and merged the two articles. Everything should be in order now, if not, let me know. / Fred-Chess 06:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. Can now see how this came together. And it displays the work that is still undone - ah well... Thanks Williamborg 19:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

text: The category used to be called "Norwegian Forts", but was then renamed as a part of a universal change in naming policy. Fornadan (t) 01:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move corrected 
Talk:Rachel, Nevada

message: Rick's original text read "UFO hunters visit Rachel to buy supplies before continuing on down the highway to try to catch activities at the top-secret United States Air Force base."  I was tempted to follow this, adding "...and then are sure to catch activities Fort Leavenworth Kansas, generally for several decades" but I thought better of it.  In practice almost no-one uses Rachel as a staging point on an Area 51 expedition any more (and it's not like all that many people ever did).  Since the government acquired all the high lands west of Rachel (between it and Groom) there's really no point, and climbing the mountains to the east requires more effort, and a longer lens, than is worthwhile. -- John Fader (talk | contribs) 02:11, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: heh

message: My recent updates to this page were reverted with the comment "unreliable source". How is a reference to the official web site of the town of Rachel, NV an unreliable source for a page dedicated to the town or Rachel NV??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoergArnu (talk • contribs) 18:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Read WP:RS. Calling something "official" doesn't make it so. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent updates
Talk:Asanga

message: Somebody has mentioned that Asanga is also known as Arya-asanga.  This is perhaps not essential as "arya" is a title of respect given to many great Buddhist scholar-monks.--Stephen Hodge 02:16, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This sections needs clarifying because it is misleading and inaccurate as it stands.  The Tibetan tradition attributes the verses, the Ratna-gotra-vibhaga proper to Maitreya -- that's why it's included in the well-known "5 Dharmas of Maitreya".  Asanga is creditd with authorship of the Vyakhya. There is also a Sanskrit fragment in Saka script recently discovered which also attributes the verses to Maitreya. Changes will need to be made in due to reflect this.  -- अनाम गुमनाम 02:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So get a source and add it. Mitsube (talk) 02:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So civil. Does this miserable worm dare assume he has your esteemed and magnanimous permission to change your jewel-like lines of erudition ?  -- अनाम गुमनाम 02:42, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual Accuracy