lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Castaibert aircraft

message: I'm surprised (& pleased!) that someone took care of including this not-so-well known aircraft builder... will try to find more info and expand the article in the next few weeks.  Regards, DPdH (talk) 14:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find good reference material so far; seems that since my last visit the article didn't change too much. I'll keep searching for verifiable sources. Regards, DPdH (talk) 03:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion? 
Talk:Adolf Borchers

message: Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions.
No de.wiki article exists. Did not hold a significant command and topped out as Major. Successful completion of missions (sorties flown, # of enemy aircraft shot down, etc) is not part of SOLDIER. A MilHist RfC on this topic has failed to gain consensus in May of 2017: 
*MilHist:RfC on the notability of flying aces.
Please also see a note at  MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists. 
K.e.coffman (talk) 01:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Argyllshire (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I have started a discussion of relevance to this article at 1958 Argyll by-election as it uses Conservative rather than Unionist in describing results and I have suggested that that might be changed for consistency with this and other articles (and also for accuracy). Dunarc (talk) 21:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related discussion
Talk:Berwick and East Lothian (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I am not sure that the graph of vote changes in Berwickshire seats is helpful or meaningful here. The seats Berwickshire has been in since 1983 have a much more Liberal/Conservative tradition the Berwick and East Lothian did throughout its existence when it was Labour a Conservative marginal and more of the seat is in the modern East Lothian (which is usually considered the successor seat) than is in the current seat of Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk. Dunarc (talk) 22:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graph
Talk:Flushing Airport

message: Surely it can't be.  Floyd Bennett Field ramped up operations in the early 1930s, several years before Laguardia Airport, and must have eclipsed Speed's during those years.  Or am I missing something?  Jim.henderson 21:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's mentioned in a number of sources I used to write the article. (See ) So I added it in. This PDF publication does say that it was competing with Floyd Bennett Field. I don't doubt that Floyd Bennett Field was more popular considering that it is now a park commemorating its service. --Voidvector 22:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, the sources all say so, all of them more than half a century later, and none of them mentions NOP at all, or says whether "busy" is measured by aircraft movements, passengers, cargo tonnage, or other numbers.  Despite my skepticism I guess it has to stand unless someone can find comparitive and precisely defined traffic figures that include other than Queens airports, or a contemporary source that can trump these modern ones.  Thanks for your attention.  Jim.henderson 03:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Busiest in NYC

message: Instead of a proposed redevelopment project of the former airport after it closed, I found a link to one that was said to be proposed in December 1971, according to the "Abandoned and Little Known Airfields website. I've been trying to see if there was any connection between the airport and the old "Edo Aircraft Corporation" building, but considering that the building was on 14th Avenue, it seems a little too far north. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  16:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed redevelopment projects
Talk:National Airlines Flight 27

message: I found a picture of the evacuation of Flight 27 on Wikimedia Commons:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:National_Airlines_Flight_27_after_emergency_landing.jpg
I also found a picture of N60NA, the aircraft involved, albeit with a different name.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:National_Airlines_DC-10_N60NA_%22Suzanne%22_(cropped).jpg CriticalMaster95 (talk) 01:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible images for use 

message: Hello Fellow Wikipedians,
I have overhauled this article with additional encyclopedic content, sections, and images, and other fixes, incorporating information in the existing sources; I therefore added no new sources.
Please  boldly assess this article for inclusion of C-class rating.
Cheers, Kehkou (talk) 01:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial rewrite; or, Complete article overhaul
Talk:East Dunbartonshire (UK Parliament constituency)

message: the change figures for the seat at the February 1974 United Kingdom general election compared with the result at the 1974 United Kingdom general election and describing the seat as a Conservative Gain in February 1974 are to my mind misleading as the 1970 Dunbartonshire East had very different boundaries from its East Dunbartonshire successor as the article makes clear. A good chunk of the old seat which was most favourable to Labour went into the new Central Dunbartonshire seat in 1974 - most significantly Clydebank, with Dunbartonshire East's MP Hugh McCartney moving to Central Dunbartonshire which he easily won. In reality the Conservatives would almost certainly have won the seat in 1970 had it been fought on the post 1974 boundaries, while had the old boundaries been in place in 1974 there is little doubt the seat would have returned a Labour MP. I would therefore suggest no change figures being included and the seat being described as a Conservative Win rather than a gain, with a note indicating that boundary changes make comparison difficult.  Dunarc (talk) 22:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 1974 changes and "gain" status 

message: I am waiting for a double hip operation can you advise on the waiting list? I have been told 2/3 years.. is anyone checking this list to see whether there really is a list this long? Lots of patients are going private, if they can afford it 2A02:C7C:D308:AC00:1496:F490:E6CD:2F79 (talk) 14:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NHS Operation
Talk:James Brian Tait

message: Sadly, the Daily Telegraph is not the paper it once was and its Obituaries page has, for some years, been unreliable on detail. The unequivocal statement that Tait is the sole airman to have been awarded the DSO four times is factually inaccurate, as a check on the Wiki entry for Basil Embry will show... 
   The exact combination of 4 DSOs married with 2 DFCs is pretty unique, but then 6 gallantry decorations (as opposed to the awards given to senior commanders for distinguished service) is pretty unique among all the Commonwealth nations and all three services for all time. It is hard to view the record of Tait, Embry & Braham and their equivalents in other services (LCol. Pearson, LCol. Mayne and Capt. Walker, RN, etc.) and see them as 'less brave' than the winners of the Victoria Cross.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Protozoon (talk • contribs) 17:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Edinburgh Central (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I have changed to Conservative hold rather than gain with reference and explanatory note. Actually the Edinburgh Central of 1983 was closer to the old Edinburgh North which was abolished and had been Alex Fletcher's seat since 1973.
Dunarc (talk) 20:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1983 
Talk:Iris Peterson

message: The most recent source is from 2007, which makes it 14 years old. She is about 99. We need better sourcing to show she is alive. I also have to admit I am unconvinced that the sourcing we have adds up to notability. The article also engages in a lot of coatracking, where it talks about changes in regulations on flight attendnants for example without showing in any way that anything Peterson did had any impact on such regulations.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Is she still alive
Talk:Edinburgh and St Andrews Universities (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Was he elected in 1910 as a Liberal Unionist as the list of MPs states (and his article suggests) or a Conservative as the election results listed here indicate? It looks a bit odd having two different claims in the same article.
Dunarc (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sir Robert Bannatyne Finlay
Talk:Glasgow Cathcart (UK Parliament constituency)

message: For 1983 is it correct to describe this as a Labour hold? The seat's boundaries had changed and the BBC/ITN projections for the 1983 General election indicated had the 1979 election been fought on the revised boundaries Teddy Taylor would have held the seat for the Conservatives. Indeed the change in vote percentage figures indicated here would seem to support that. Thus should it be Labour Gain? Dunarc (talk) 19:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1983
Talk:Glasgow Govan (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Is it fair to say it was a Labour gain in 1955 as the boundaries of the seat were heavily redrawn and much of the 1950-55 version of Govan ended up in the new Craigton seat which Jack Nixon Browne moved to (and won)? Dunarc (talk) 15:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labour Gain 1955? 

message: This article does not reflect the fact the seat was not called Glasgow Govan until 1918. Prior to that it was the Govan division of Lanarkshire. Govan was not incorporated into the city of Glasgow until 1912. Therefore the article should reflect this. Indeed there might be a case for a seperate Govan (UK Parliament constituency) Article covering the pre-1918 results.  Dunarc (talk) 17:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This article covers the results over that period so that's adequate enough doktorb wordsdeeds 19:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glasgow Govan/Govan 
Talk:Glasgow Hillhead (UK Parliament constituency)

message: While it says here SDP gain from Conservative, the Times Guide to the House of Commons 1983 indicates that on the new boundaries introduced for the 1983 election Labour would have gained the seat in 1979 (and so counts it as a Labour loss.) Indeed it included much of the old Glasgow Kelvingrove seat held by Neil Carmichael who was the Labour candidate for Hillhead in 1983. Given Jenkins had won the old Hillhead might SDP win be a more appropriate description. Dunarc (talk) 16:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed this to SDP gain from Labour and put in some relevant cited text to explain the situation. Dunarc (talk) 20:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1983 'gain' status 

message: I have changed this from Glasgow Partick to Partick. The former article relates to the constituency created in 1918 at the same time as Hillhead. The latter is the seat which included what would become Hillhead and was originally not part of Glasgow, but a division of  Lanarkshire. Dunarc (talk) 16:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created from in infobox
Talk:Glasgow Partick (UK Parliament constituency)

message: This article contradicts itself about whether MacAndrew and Young were MPs for 1931-35 and 1934-45.  I suspect that the election results for 1931 and 1935 have become tranposed since there is mention elsewhere of Young being a junior minister during WW2, and Labour did experience a limited recovery in 1935. PatGallacher (talk) 19:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mount Edmund

message: This whole page is nonsense: there is no such place.  The article claims said mountain 1419 m high: there are no mountains that high outside the Scottish Highlands.  It claims to be part of the Black Mountains, but is the wrong side of Abergavenny for that to be true.  In short, it is utter crap. — ras52 21:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Linlithgow (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The results for the 1997 general election add up to >100%, which is clearly incorrect. I cannot find a source of this. Can the page maintainer have a look?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puntofisso (talk • contribs) 10:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1997 election results do not add up
Talk:Midlothian and Peebles Northern (UK Parliament constituency)

message: :The Times 8 Dec 1923, The Labour Year Book 1924, The Constitutional Year Book 1924, The Liberal Year Book 1924, Sunday Post, Lanarkshire 19 Oct 1924, Edinburgh Evening News 29 Oct 1924 gives the votes as 8,583, 6,738 and 3,583, majority 1,845. The Times House of Commons 1929 gives the majority as 1,845. 
:The Constitutional Year Book 1929 and The Liberal Year Book 1929 give 8,570, 6,731 and 3,578, majority 1,839. 
:I think the votes reported in The Times on 8 December 1923 were used by the respective party yearbooks for 1924. I think the local papers in previewing the 1924 elections used the same Times source. The 1929 party yearbook's make the same change, that logically can only have been triggered by the same event. That event I suspect to have been a correction to the original figures. It is possible that local papers in 1924 did not pick up on the correction. 
:On balance, I am going with my hunch that the figures sourced from 1929 are the right ones.16:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 1923 Voting figures
Talk:Sadhvi Rithambara

message: The current report says that she was involved in Demolition of Babri Masjid which led to death of 2000+ People. Just for letting every responsible person know, Babri Was demolished in 1991 year and the 2000+ deaths referred to the Gujrat riots which happened 9 whole years later in 2002. there's no way she can lead to 2000 deaths for what she involved in 9 years ago. The specific Muslims of Godhara were the ones responsible for these riots. They burned down a whole train and 58 Hindu Saints in it mercilessly. This striked them down as the anger of public and many innocent lost their lives. 
This is the major one, the other problems are all over the article. Telling that she urged that Muslims should be killed all over the country, which is not proved anywhere and someone who says this cannot live such a popular life in front of  Indian judiciary. I am a Muslim living in India saying this. Hope this will be listened. Kenddjss (talk) 16:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: true.. Typical left-wing editing, we should maintain neutrality, no matter what our personal views, I have added some basic summary in intro to give an overall picture of the person. --Ekabhishektalk 13:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid try to project her as a terrorist more than a Sadhvi 

message: What's with the citation kill? TrangaBellam (talk) 02:28, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deep revert?
Talk:Doctor Doom in other media

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  13:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/PlaneShift (computer game)

message: Just some observations.
* Half of this article seems like original research. WP:NOR Who said this, and where did they come up with this...
* None of these sources seem to be acceptable by consensus, evidenced by this AFD.
* There is nothing noteworthy about this game. Is isn't the first to do anything it has done. It isn't the most successful. It is a luke warm game, by a company trying to propel it to fame through hyping it as an "open" game. It doesn't compete with commercial alternatives, and it isn't open. Game over.
EvanCarroll 05:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone care if I move this to Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/PlaneShift (computer game), so it doesn't clutter up the AFD page?  It seems that's where this section belongs.  Tuxide 23:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. Miremare 21:39, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Granby Dam

message: Could the drying up of Lake Mead possibly be the result of the Dam at lake Granby not releasing water back into the Colorado River? 172.58.169.239 (talk) 02:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake Mead and Lake Granby
Talk:Roxburgh, Selkirk and Peebles (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Popular culture cross-reference
In The_Black_Adder_(pilot_episode), the Scottish hero McAngus is given not just any lands, but those of Prince Edmund, the Duke of Edinburgh, in Scotland, namely: Roxburgh and Selkirk - and adding a couple of sentences later, after Edmund's comment that this would only leave Peebles to Edmund, "Oh, aye! And Peebles." See: 
84.176.116.62 (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stirling and Falkirk (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I do not believe that Stirling, Falkirk and Grangemouth was the only non-contiguous constituency in its time. East Dunbartonshire was certainly split in two parts until 1983 (Bearsden and Kirkintilloch), and I believe East Flint was split in two parts (Flint and Maelor). AtSwimTwoBirds (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-contiguous constituency
Talk:Strathkelvin and Bearsden (UK Parliament constituency)

message: As the seat did not exist prior to the 1983 general election I am wondering what the percentage change figures are based on - is it a notional result for if the seat had existed in 1979? If so I am not sure how reliable it is as a Conservative vote share of 46.5% seems unlikely given that in the main predecessor seat East Dunbartonshire the Conservatives only polled just over 34% in 1979. Equally the SNP polled  20.6% in the old East Dunbartonshire so the 12.9% implied here seems a bit low, especially as they had also polled about 20% in West Stirlingshire in 1979, parts of which had also been added to the new constituency. Dunarc (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have discovered that The Times Guide to the House of Commons 1979 suggests that the notional 1979 figures compiled for the BBC and ITN did suggest a large Conservative majority for this seat, so the change figures may well be based on these notional results. However, even if that is so I think it should be made clear. I am also somewhat sceptical of the merits of notional changes, particularly for 1983 as I know it was felt at the time that some of these notional 1979 figures may not have been that accurate (and some of the 1983 results seemed to confirm this - Birmingham Erdington was the famous example). Dunarc (talk) 19:57, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1983 change figures
Talk:North Tayside (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I'm pretty sure this article should actually be at North Tayside (UK Parliament constituency) - the form with the compass point at the front was followed for all other County Constituencies created in 1997, and the form with the compass point at the end was used for all Borough Constituencies. See the Statutory Instrument that set the Scottish constituencies up. — sjorford++ 16:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The BBC has it listed as Tayside North in 2001, while Ask Aristotle at The Guardian has it listed as Tayside North in 1992 and North Tayside in 1997. Assuming that Ask Aristotle is correct on the date that the name changed you have three elections under the name Tayside North (1983, 1987 & 1992) against two elections under the name North Tayside (1997 & 2001). The constituency was abolished at the 2005 election so there is no current name to consider. As one name redirects to the other and both appear correct I see little need for a rename. Regards. Road Wizard (talk) 17:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?
Talk:Regency Hotel (Denver)

message: I propose that Regency Hotel (Denver) be merged into The Regency, Denver. Since both articles refer to the same building, I see no need to have separate articles.  The article pertaining to the hotel can be moved into a subtitle "History" on the student housing article. Xnatedawgx (talk) 22:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Sculptured House

message: The Sculptured house is not located where the coordinates said it does. It is a bit farther west, closer to Genesee Park. Anyone know how to link coordinates? I would of added the correct location in, but I'm not familiar on how to run lat and long. Flibbert (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I fixed it yesterday. Sorry for the initial mixup. Rolando (talk) 21:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: The elevator reference is not fully verified. The Wall Street reference is ambiguous; there are no photos of said elevator anywhere on the web, and the one featured in the movie, "Sleeper" is clearly a prop. This reference should be removed from the wiki.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.162.52 (talk) 23:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevator 

message: The futuristic architecture in Charlie's Angels is not "Sculptured House", it is "Chemosphere House - 7776 Torreyson Drive, Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles, California, USA". I am both familiar with the architects involved and the appearance and history from reference materials in relation to the architects. The citation points to an IMDb page that does not include "Sculptured House". https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0160127/locations?ref_=tt_ql_dt_5. Therefore, I am removing the reference to "Charlie's Angels (2000) Film". User:Splurben  —Preceding undated comment added 06:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie's Angels (2000) Film
Talk:Cornwall in the English Civil War

message: It has been pointed out on Talk:Pendennis Castle that the text in the siege of Pendennis Castle section introduced in the first edit is a direct copy of the Cornwall-online website. This is supported by evidence from the Internet Archive, which shows that the text was on their website from December 2001, nearly 6 years before the creation of this article. As such, this constitutes a clear breach of copyright and I will remove the offending text immediately.
Editors are welcome to rephrase the text in their own words while citing the website as the original source. Road Wizard (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation