Talk:Battle of Baekgang

message: Date: 28/01/2013 
The maps shown is not the time of mid-7th century but 5th century or early 6th century. Gaya since 532AD had been conquered, became a part of Silla.
Someone with good resource, please change the map.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.252.112.169 (talk) 10:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The map is wrong

message: Um, doesn't this page now contain information about two different battles?  The Battle of Hwangsanbeol in 660 is quite notable, but entirely different from the 663 clash.  -- Visviva 02:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. The information currently in this battle regards battle of Baekgang, while I created a seperate article of Battle of Hwangsanbeol in 660. However, more information needs to be integrated in the Battle of Hwangsanbeol article.  Deiaemeth 02:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two battles?

message: I am working on some major edits to this article.  Please make comments here if you believe the article can use improvement.  WangKon936 11:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. Excellent work, my friend. When I first came upon this article many months ago, I feared that it could never be expanded. Thank you very much for your efforts. LordAmeth 08:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Edits

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Battle of Baekgang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050313021935/http://museum.wonkwang.ac.kr:80/kor/edu/edu-pro/pro-04.htm to http://museum.wonkwang.ac.kr/kor/edu/edu-pro/pro-04.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060525232417/http://www004.upp.so-net.ne.jp:80/teikoku-denmo/no_frame/history/honbun/hakusuki.html to http://www004.upp.so-net.ne.jp/teikoku-denmo/no_frame/history/honbun/hakusuki.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311031452/http://youngkwang.newsk.com:80/sub/view.asp?com_id=614&n_id=313012 to http://youngkwang.newsk.com/sub/view.asp?com_id=614&n_id=313012
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Dates are wrong throughout the article because the dates of the lunisolar calendar are given as the dates of the solar calendar. Thus, the battle actually took place in October 663, not in August.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.160.37.187 (talk) 05:39, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Date Calculation 

message: This is terrible.  When editing, go ahead and add the reference at the same time.  Some of this stuff is going on six years with citation tags! 50.111.26.236 (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is in critical - CRITICAL - need of inline refs 

message: Baekje royalty were ranked at third place of Yamato court nobility. <ref> "Chronicle of Japan, Continued"(続日本紀)天平神護2年6月28日条　<ref>"Chronicle of Japan"(日本書紀)持統天皇5年正月7  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 長岡輝久男 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baekje royalty who fled to Japan weren't given the same (royalty) ranks and titles in the Yamato court