Talk:Gokkun

message: This Illustration, although excellent is incorrectly described. The vessel illustrated is not a beaker as stated but a graduated cylinder. Beakers are frequently employed in the Gokkun genre as well as conical flasks. Especially in productions where the actress will consume the collected seminal emissions of a large number of ejaculations, which frequently number well over 100. Directors will often emphasize the enormous quantity of semen the actress will consume by using laboratory glass ware. 80.229.107.41 (talk) 19:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have an image we could use that would be great. If you have a source for that information then it would be fun to add to he article. Cptnono (talk) 02:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole article needs improving, it's very incomplete and a little misleading at the moment. Although more complete illustrations/photos would improve things I think they should be held back until the article is more satisfactory. As for citing sources for the article, would it be satisfactory to cite the actual production codes of JAV productions?Fourisplenty (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The images improve the article so start finding sources and adding them. Images aren't frosting on the cake as you seem to be asserting. I have no idea what JAV productions is. I assume it isn't RS but please feel free to provide  link.Cptnono (talk) 01:52, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration Legend 

message: Should this be merged into one or more of the following articles - Oral sex, Fellatio, or Semen? It doesn't really seem notable enough to have an article of its own, as this article is basically just telling people what the Japanese term for swallowing semen is. 58.169.190.110 (talk) 04:44, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: References suggest it is a variant of bukkake, so maybe that's an appropriate target.  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 21:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: The meaning was sourced to a book published by Lulu. Lulu is a vanity publisher: if I write a book full of mere bollocks and pay Lulu to publish it, Lulu will publish it. The results can occasionally be good (just as, say, Wikipedia articles can occasionally be good). This one? Well, Copac shows that not a single British university library bothers with it. The Library of Congress doesn't bother with it. Amazon tells us that it's "#1,984,931 in Books" -- granted that there's little correlation between sales and quality, this shows that there's no commercial reason to take it seriously. And therefore, this edit. -- Hoary (talk) 13:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, my mistake.  Is Éditions Denoël good enough?  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, fine. -- Hoary (talk) 14:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Junk sourcing

message: Please don't set a pixel size for the image, just let the software use the default size. See WP:IMGSIZE "In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a good reason to do so (...)". The image might look better in your monitor but it will look horrible in other computers, etc. --Enric Naval (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  image size 

message: I've rewritten this article, it's not comprehensive but I've removed the obvious errors and included some additional detail, anyone mind if I put it up or do wanna see it a sandbox first? Fourisplenty (talk) 18:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, but where are your refs? Herostratus (talk) 22:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no sources and it changes the definition of the term by saying it is only in the porn industry.  Fails verifiability and touches on a contentious issue. Please feel free to copy edit for grammar but do not make any sweeping changes without leaning on sources. And notice the page ratings. Expansion but not an overhaul is needed.Cptnono (talk) 07:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewite 

message: The current image states: An artist's concept of a woman drinking semen. :File:Wiki-gokkun.png
Concept? This is someone's opinion and is therefore original research. It has been removed accordingly. I have a concept about many things on Wikipedia but this usually means that a verifiable source is required otherwise it is deleted very quickly. Why should an image be any different? 
An "artist's concept"? Sheesh she might as be sucking off the cookie monster if that is deemed to be accuracy!! 86.182.42.44 (talk) 15:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: By your logic all diagrams and non-photographic pictures should be removed. That's complete twaddle. It is not original research to draw something based on sources. In this particular picture, what exactly are you objecting to? That that's not a woman? That she's not drinking something? That what she is drinking could not possibly be semen? This is pretty clearly just another WP:IDONTLIKEIT attempt to get rid of an image  doesn't like. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image is a violation of [[WP:OR]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Gokkun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100202033818/http://www.seekjapan.jp:80/article-1/744/The+(Almost)+Complete+Japanzine+Dictionary+of+Japan+Sex to http://www.seekjapan.jp/article-1/744/The+(Almost)+Complete+Japanzine+Dictionary+of+Japan+Sex
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Seriously, people. It does little to help the article. It might as well be a still from a porno for all the good it does. Thereby, I've removed it.--Rainythunderstorm (talk) 11:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the section abouve. There you can find the reasons. Noone needs to repeat them to you again. 78.94.53.130 (talk) 11:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  . . . Why does this image exist again? 

message: I'd like to replace it with an archive.org link, in case the source gets deleted.--Rainythunderstorm (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permission to replace first reference with archived version? 

message: I'm not familiar with all of wikipedia's rules and junk, but the japanese article is not named Gokkun [ゴックン], it is Insei [飲精] (or Seiin [精飲]), which would translate into English as Drink Semen (in the case of Insei [飲精]) or Semen Drink (for Seiin [精飲]). Japanese Article: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/飲精
Therefore, I'd like to propose, if someone knows how, that this article be renamed to "Semen-Drinking." Drinking semen is not a uniquely Japanese sex act, and a name change to "Semen-Drinking" would decisively move it away from the implication (through use of the article name Gokkun) that it is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.71.30.183 (talk) 20:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petition to rename to Semen-Drinking? 

message: This article is a fairly useless stub, and I see no reason why it shouldn't simply be folded into the "Ingestion" section of Semen.Ithinkiplaygames (talk) 09:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal