lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Campeonato Uruguayo de Fútbol

message: Its is better to use this page as a disambiguation page to the Primera División Uruguaya and Segunda División Uruguay articles. If no one opposes, I will do that. --Carioca 23:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I transformed this page in a disambiguation page, as, after seven days (a full week), no one opposed. --Carioca 00:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion
Talk:Jibbs Featuring Jibbs

message: is it explicit
apparently not, although the label states so on the cover.
no it don't you can clearly see User: SPBLU  —Preceding comment was added at 22:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

message: This article's title has the album's title spelled with a capital F. But in the other instances of the album's name being said in the article, the F is lowercase. Which way is correct? 76.127.217.214 (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Donatus of Fiesole

message: This article makes no attempt to present a balanced or neutral view. It is entirely written from a religious Catholic POV.  It relies almost entirely on hagiographical sources. It fails to flag or discuss the impossible, or the unlikely. It provides no documentary or actual historical sources to bolster its claims. If one is using Holy Roman Emperors to bolster the reliability of the claims, some proof must be supplied. The article presents no alternative or critical views.
--Vicedomino (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systemic Bias
Talk:Caius Gabriel Cibber

message: It is highly questionable to categorize Cibber as a Danish sculptor and Schleswig a Danish province. Like most people in his hometown Flensburg he probably didn't even speak Danish but German, and the duchy Schleswig was not part of the kingdom of Denmark (like a province) but set apart as a duchy. There was a dynastic union between the duchies Schleswig, Holstein and the Danish kingdom, just like the dynastic union between Denmark and Norway. One wouldn't call Norwegian artists of the time Danish, would one? Thus a Flensburg sculptor shouldn't be called Danish, either.141.91.129.7 (talk) 12:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cibber a  Danish sculptor? Schleswig a Danish province?
Talk:Charlotte Charke

message: Ok, if anyone wants to put a box on this article explain why.  Explain what is added to the article by it.  Explain how it benefits the reader.  Explain why it is better than a nice scan of a nice painting of the subject of the article.  Otherwise, no.  Geogre 03:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boxes are for cereals 

message: This page takes a bit too literal of a view on Charlotte Charke criticism and most of the information provided is woefully uncited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.99.56.71 (talk) 12:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are some inaccuracies... 

message: It sounds like today she would have identified herself as a trans man.  I wonder if anyone has ever looked at her from this angle. 138.88.143.26 (talk) 05:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trans
Talk:Charles Lamb

message: The M*A*S*H tidbit in "Popular references" is base.Lestrade (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pop refs

message: The DNB (1890) article on John Mathew Gutch says,
"Shortly before Lamb's death Gutch commissioned F. S. Cary to paint Lamb's portrait. This is the best likeness of Lamb extant." 
but I couldn't see an easy way to add that. cygnis insignis 22:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: note on absent image

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
Oppose. I think it's a waste of time that would be better spent writing or polishing up articles. "Charles Lamb (writer)" is perfectly clear. Bmcln1 (talk) 08:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Charles spent six weeks in a psychiatric hospital during 1795.
They had lunatic asylums (asyla?) back then, not psychiatric hospitals.  No?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 12:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Anachronism
Talk:Drop zone

message: Transclusion may not have been the best solution here, perhaps simply copy paste would have worked ok, but I've left it as-is for the moment to encourage some editing, as both articles are not particularly spectacular at the moment. Feel free to improve either one. For some help with the templates used in the transclusion see the transclusion page, and pathology. Also feel free to change to copy/paste if it is deemed necessary (or accessible). RShnike (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Transclusion

message: It's "dropzone" - one word. You can check out how the military uses the term or the United States Parachute Association. Whatever. It's Dropzone. Any objections to my moving the article and leaving behind a redirect? Rklawton (talk) 01:50, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oxford Dictionary and Merriam-Webster both have "drop zone", two words. Meticulo (talk) 14:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Dropzone
Talk:Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses

message: :In the Israeli air force the SEAD role is also taken by the Harop and Harpy UCAV drones. I think a new section should be created. Irondome (talk) 02:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of SEAD UCAV types 

message: Might be worth mentioning that SEAD is often done by Artillery when within range. The Artillery suppresses the AA sites and marks targets for the aircraft.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.4.190.34 (talk) 22:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SEAD by Artillery 

message: The post-Vietnam period needs updating, particularly with Bosnia, the Gulf War and 2003 Iraq Invasion. The suppression of "enemy" air defenses and the establishment of Coalition air superiority were pivotal in those conflicts. I would add them myself but I don't feel qualified in this area to make any substantial edits. Coinmanj (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating 

message: it's too short for SEAD. Immedieately it should upgrading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.92.102.34 (talk) 13:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Enough 

message: I have citations for the lack of Russian SEAD. Where is this capability showing up in the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. If there had been any, it would have shown up on 24-25 February 2022, right after the missile strikes on Ukraine.Mark Antonio Wright (26 February 2022 3:11 PM) Why The Russians Are Struggling MSNBC (1 Mar 2022) 40-Mile Long' Russian Military Convoy Approaching Ukraine CapitalJim Garamone  (3 Mar 2022) Russian Invasion Stalled in Ukraine's North, Progress in South  Kyiv convoy largely stalled. "Ukrainian command and control nodes continue to function, and Ukraine's air defenses remain effective". 480 Russian missile launchers in Ukraine —DoD count. 90% of Russian forces have been committed to the invasion.Max Hauptman (3 Mar 2022) Russia’s 40-mile-long convoy outside Kyiv is ‘stalled’ — and a big sitting duck "Attacking it is a more complicated question" It's been 10 days so far (09:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are some additional citations which I just saw, an which support these statements. --Ancheta Wis    (talk  | contribs) 15:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russo-Ukrainian SEAD
Talk:Landing zone

message: I think the second and third paragraphs contradict themselves.
Wiki flight simmer 15:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is because someone confused a FSB with an LZ. The 1st Cav described most of their FSBs as LZs, creating I suspect the initial source confusion. The sections "Building the LZ" and "Temporary LZs" should actually be taken out of this article, with a redirect to FSB should someone come here looking for a 1st Cav-terminology LZ. I deleted the "Building the LZ" section. Intothatdarkness (talk) 17:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory

message: Current US TTP is to NOT indicate to the aircraft what color the smoke is BEFORE the aircraft IDs the smoke color.  That way, an adversary who has access to our radio nets due to compromise (overrun CP for example) is not able to throw the right color and cause confusion or misdirect our aircraft into an ambush. Caisson 06 (talk) 14:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This was also the procedure during Vietnam after early 1966.Intothatdarkness (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popping Smoke (Identifying the LZ)
Talk:Digital television in Europe

message: Is this article meant to be about High Definition or Digital television as it seems to be trying to be both but not suceeding. HDTV and DTV are not the same thing albeit HDTV needs DTV, not all DTV is HD. --Achmelvic 23:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was created a while ago by merging the European part of List of digital television deployments by country with High-definition television in Europe. The reasons for this where not clear and I'd say it wasn't very good, the article a bit messy and HDTV and digital TV are two different things. I'd suggest that the article is de-merged and cleaned up. Väsk 18:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Diamond Multimedia

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Dstealthiis220.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement 

message: Could anyone write about the relationship of Diamond MM and SPEA? (http://web.archive.org/web/19961115142041/www.spea.com/lang/ENG/homepage.html)
85.222.57.51 (talk) 18:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPEA 

message: Every product mentioned should have a year of release. There is remarkably little calendar info in this aricle. Bustter (talk) 07:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  YEARS?
Talk:Sortie (disambiguation)

message: To sally also in bold because of the redirect on "to sally" --Philip Baird Shearer 11:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To sally

message: I'm not enough of an expert on naval usage to make the edit, but I think the verb "sortie" is often used in describing ship movements before a battle. If someone else can improve the article, please do. Oaklandguy (talk) 07:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Naval usage

message: I restored this section. The rationale given by DexDor when he removed the section after it was blanked by an anonymous user is utterly uncompelling given the content of the rest of the article. Yes, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but removing stub material isn't the way articles are improved. "Sortie" in the context of a siege is the original meaning of the term and if this article is going to exist (and I'm not saying it necessarily does), it needs that information in it. TaintedMustard (talk) 21:09, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Siege warfare section 

message: The definition given here is inadequate; the term is used in civilian contexts, not just military. It is used in space flight, and also in civilian aviation. In an Airbus certification flight test program, for example, the test lasts for an extended duration and contains several test flights, each of which has been referred to as a sortie. JustinTime55 (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequate scope
Talk:Creamola Foam

message: I was totally lost on what Brause was. I searched around and saw that it was compared to Creamola.  This article was greatly useful to me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.189.229 (talk) 23:24, 20 October 2006‎
:I have tried Brause Pulver and in a purely subjective comment I would say "Dont bother". It has some of the Fizz, but not the sherbet and definitely not the foam.-82.108.207.210 (talk) 09:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brause 
Talk:Nikolaus Lenau

message: * ... he disliked the Americans with their eternal English lisping of dollars (englisches Talergelispel).    
What does this mean?  --  JackofOz 01:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This means that instead of pronouncing the word "Taler" with a hard "t," the Americans pronounced their equivalent word "dollar," with a soft "d." Lenau thought that it was similar to the way that Spaniards substitute "th" for "s." Note of interest: Spaniards adopted this pronunciation for the benefit of their king, who had a speech impediment.Lestrade (talk) 17:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Belated thanks for your thoughts.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 11:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Forward operating base

message: I slightly disagree with the orignator of the term FOBit.  I believe it is a portmanteau of FOB and Hobbit and I also believe it was around before the timeframe said in this article.  I could be wrong.  That is why I would like to see a citation.  I'm glad it was brought up though. --JAYMEDINC 00:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fobbit

message: The article doesn't do a good job of explaining how a US base would be considered a FOB.  I think the answer has to do with their "tactical" nature as the intro paragraph suggests, but I think it would be good to explain this more precisely. 70.251.147.224 (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: US FOBs

message: My understanding is that FOBs are usually supported primarily by a specific MOB.  Is this true, or not?  Can we speak to that in the article?  If it's true, can we document these supporting relationships to the listed FOBs? 70.251.147.224 (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FOB Support

message: I propose that we move the FOBs in Afghanistan section to a new article called List of forward operating bases as the withdrawal is coming to an end (mostly) and that this article should be more focused on what a forward operating base is and does
Any suggestions?
Gavbadger (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . Gavbadger (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of forward operating bases 

message: My name is Abdul Khaliq nazari I was work as interpreter in fob Aryan in ghazni Afghanistan I have do lots of petrol with usarmy in fob Aryan ghazni Afghanistan and I don't have no information about my team so please help me out from Afghanistan help me please 111.125.153.49 (talk) 14:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help me out from Afghanistan
Talk:V formation

message: The article currently perpetuates a myth (by flying in a V formation, the whole flock of geese adds 71% greater flying range than if each bird flew alone) that has been embraced worldwide by hundreds of websites. In the solution to one of my puzzles, "What the Wild Goose Knows" (with thousands of readers since it was first published in 1999 at http://niquette.com/puzzles/goosep.htm), I have taken the trouble to analyze the claim and conclude that a more realistic benefit of the v formation is in the 1% to 2% range (a biological advantage, just the same).  In this talk-entry, I am inviting the Wikipedian-in-Charge of the V formation article (a) to put aside the jocular formulation of the puzzle and (b) to cite the analysis in the solution, perhaps even adding an external link. 
Paul Niquette (talk) 16:12, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gooses

message: In military aviation this is also called 'vic' formation, yes? Or is that a different thing? Drutt (talk) 01:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Planes

message: This article seemed to be about two different things. Also, the section on military flight needed expanding, but would have overwhelmed the content on bird flight and aerodynamics, so I've cancelled the redirect at Vic formation and written it there. I've merged some of the content here to there also. Xyl 54 (talk) 05:08, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Our recent research result shows that V-shape reformation helps to balance the drag load and reduce the required energy to fly.Please have a look at "Energy conservation of V-shaped swarming fixed-wing drones through position reconfiguration", https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1270963819320310. Amirmirzaeinia (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  v reformation
Talk:Beartrap (hauldown device)

message: I think this article would be greatly improved by a photo of the beartrap in use, i.e. winching in a helicopter. BigNate37(T) 05:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo request 
Talk:Chevrolet Camaro B4C

message: anything you think needs added to this? let me know and I will research and add it B4Ctom1 23:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I propose that Chevrolet Camaro B4C be merged into Chevrolet Camaro (fourth generation). Per WP Automobile Project conventions, this separate article covers only the fourth-generation Camaro police package option that should be part of the specific "generation" article. CZmarlin (talk) 02:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Saraph

message: This article should indeed be merged, but not into the Israeli Air Force page but rather into Boeing AH-64 Apache. Unless anyone objects, I will perform it myself in the next few days and redirect this page to Seraph (disambiguation), which is in fact the English term for the Hebrew Saraph. Poliocretes (talk) 10:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this article will likely never expand beyond this point, and is not notable enough.  --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 12:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Swedish Air Force Museum

message: The Fiat C.R. 42 preserved at this museum is not even a one-of-a-kind aircraft, and therefor not ".....the rarest aircraft on display"! Several of the other aircraft on display are, like the already mentioned Junkers Ju86. The salvaged DC-3, 79001, is a former C-47, not a Dakota. Yes, there is a difference (different air forces, different names!), only 79005 and 79008 were former Dakotas. The ELINT work was not for the US Air Force. It was more complicated than that!--Towpilot (talk) 23:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mier expedition

message: At the time, there was a distinction between Texan, Texican, and Tejano.  Under the historical contect, I believe it is incorrect to say that the expedition was carried out by Texans, as it was a combination of Texans and Texicans, mostly the latter (I think).  
Texan = non-Mexican native to Texas
Texican = US immigrant to Texas
Tejano (sp?) = Mexican native to Texas
     Nodosaurus 23:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Texan, Texican, Tejano 

message: A google search turned up only 20 references to this phrase, many of them obviously copied off of this Wiki page.  It's never been used in a publication available in Google Book Search.  "Black Bean Lottery" gets 186 references on Google, while "Black Bean Episode" appears 469 times and is the title preferred by the Handbook of Texas, probably the most scholarly encyclopedia on Texas history in use today.  I've changed the statement to reflect these facts. 69.227.126.47 16:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "In what ''came to be known'' as the Black Bean Death Lottery"
Talk:Erieye

message: Added list of user Analayo (talk) 08:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Operator

message: How is this pronounced?  --Pawyilee (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Dont have a reliable source but I believe it is ear-e-i. MilborneOne (talk) 18:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronuciation 
Talk:Black Cat Squadron

message: One should also be aware that the designation "Black Cat Squadron" is not unique to this unit.  The U.S. Air Force 6913ESS of Augsburg Germany was also called the "Black Cat Squadron"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.82.237.32 (talk) 16:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There also were a number of black-painted, night-fighting Consolidated PBY Catalinas during World War II that were known as "Black Cats," and the units of which they were a part were referred to as "Black Cat squadrons."173.62.108.108 (talk) 20:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  PBY Black Cats 
Talk:Gyro gunsight

message: The section Usage (Mark II Gyro Sight) is just a long list of aircraft that use one type of GGS. Unsourced and Seems unbalanced ? Can we add "british" to the section title ? or is there no risk of confusion ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there only one Mark II GS 

message: Explain or link how gyro used to make sight lead the barrel - clarify if it works just left-right or also up-down ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could do with explanation of how gyro(s) used. 

message: Explain how the EZ 42 improves on the MK II, and how it uses the 2nd gyro ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is the dual gyro EZ 42 better

message: The article says a P-47 with a gyro sight was captured in early 1942. The Thunderbolt did not enter combat until March 1943, and did not receive gyro sights for about another year. 2600:8800:2204:63:7477:F0E1:3D6B:763A (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germans captured P-47
Talk:Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion

message: were these planes powered by a Liquid fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR)?
http://energyfromthorium.com/2006/04/22/a-brief-history-of-the-liquid-fluoride-reactor/
http://home.engineering.iastate.edu/~pjscott/Sorensen_Google_LFTR.pdf
thanks
James Michael DuPont (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Strictly speaking, none of the planes were ever powered by any reactor at all; the reactor flown on the NB-36H was a conventional one. - The Bushranger One ping only 16:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thorium
Talk:Tinto

message: I've been up Tinto 4 times with my buddy who lives near the foot of the hill, and he insists the cairn at the top is the biggest in Scotland. Anybody know if this is true, and if so, does it deserve a mention? Camillus (talk) 23:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 100px|rightI've just had a look, and I think you might be right - it's the biggest I've seen. My GPS gave a difference of 3m between the top of the trig point and the top of the 'monument' on the cairn. The cairn also has a very wide base and it's not made of pebbles; some of the rocks would need two or three people to lift them. It looks man-made, but must have taken a huge effort.--ML5 (talk) 15:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biggest cairn?
Talk:Escadron de Transport 60

message: While the Airbus might be more durable in some respects, wouldn't it consume more fuel for a given mission profile than either of the Falcons? I thought that one of the advantagers of having a business-jet was that it would be less expensive to operate than a much larger aircraft. knoodelhed (talk) 16:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operational costs right?
Talk:ANBO IV

message: Sorry, could anyone fix it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.60.41.4 (talk) 16:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor English 
Template talk:Sony Pictures Animation

message: This template looks broken (see its appearance on Hotel Transylvania as an example). Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 23:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was. The editor didn't cap off the end. I know nothing about this topic, so I'm leaving future arrangements to others, but at least it's more or less fixed now.--Bacteria 11:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Weapon systems officer

message: This article only talks about the position in the US Armed Forces. The US isn't the only country to employ WSOps. I know for a fact, the Royal Air Force has them. --78.147.200.153 (talk) 16:27, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only USA? 