lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Program Files

message: There is a cross-wiki discussion in progress as to whether c: should be enabled globally as an interwiki prefix for links to the Wikimedia Commons. If the proposal gains consensus this will require the deletion or renaming of several pages on the English WIkipedia whose titles begin with "C:", including one or more redirects to this page. Please take a moment to participate in the discussion.
There is also a related discussion on the English Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 February 16#C:ATT to which you are invited to contribute.
Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 15:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comments: <code>c:</code> link prefix for Wikimedia Commons 

message: " are typically stored in the 'Common Program Files' directory" - I think this folder name is "Common Files"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.1.240.177 (talk) 19:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Certainly
Talk:Ateneo de San Pablo

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:ADSP seal.gif, found on :Ateneo de San Pablo, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 14:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted

message: There are no other sources marked. I assume what happened is that an alumnus wrote all of this article down, assuming that their word was as good as gospel.
If that was actually the case, the problem, of course, is that no one can be sure if proper research has been done. Indeed, before my edit, the History section was definitely had a pro-Jesuit and anti-diocesan slant. I wonder if there are other publications elsewhere that can confirm what was written here? Yo.dazo (talk) 18:49, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this article actually written as a primary source?
Talk:Branches of medicine

message: This article seems to be a duplicate to the list in Medicine - I'll merge it with that one. Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This list was a little bit more comprehensive. Nevertheless, medical specialty is the proper subarticle for such details. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with medicine
Talk:Bethann Siviter

message: Have archived comments from initial start-up. Thank you for help. Just a few thoughts now on my first page:/startup editing comments - no longer contextual
When helping someone new or who you might assume to be new, the more specific and direct your comments the better. Saying "Fix this" is helpful. Saying "Fix this: do this with that, and that with this because..." is wonderfully helpful and sure to win loving thoughts in your direction. 
Do not assume everyone understands as well as you do: giving a directive to "read the manual" is okay, but it is important to realise that not everyone reads the manual and comes to the same conclusion: the help that pointed out what I needed to change, how it needed to change and why was the best and most useful information. I had read the manual, but didn't understand how I had not done what it recommended until someone else pointed it out.  NurseUK (talk) 23:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/PrestonH

message: * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 07:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for PrestonH

message: :Copied from Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PrestonH. Daniel 01:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, the deficiency in meaningful edits to mainspace means that this user lacks the understanding which is so crucial when applying administrator actions to/as a direct result of/in accordance with mainspace and mainspace-talk incidents. Daniel 11:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment In my opinion, I don't believe that age should matter when comes to becoming an admin. It's rather the amount knowledge of Wikipedia that a user has, and the ability to follow the standards and keep Wikipedia as clean as possible. If he is able to revert vandalism like many other vandal fighters, I don't see why age should be regarded as a concern. (And Preston, I think none of this would have happened if you never mentioned your age. :D ) AL2TB Gab or Tab 17:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: I didn't mention age or maturity at all. Please retract your statement that I was influenced by age, as I find it to be an insult to my character. Daniel 22:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Daniel, perhaps he meant it for another user, or was just making the comment generally? Redrocketboy 22:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If that was the case the user should have followed talk page conventions and not indented it how he/she did. The way it is now it is a direct response to my comment, and accuses me of being ageist. That's not on. Daniel 23:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, I put that above comment of mine in the wrong place; supposed to be in comment number 2. When I said I make silly mistakes, that was one of them. AL2TB Gab or Tab 01:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks for the note. I moved your comment up one so it was clear you were replying to oppose #2, moved this discussion (which is irrelevant to the candidacy as it focuses on placement) to the talk page (ie. here), and linked to this discussion in a tacked-on note to your original comment. Daniel 01:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement of response discussion
Talk:Space Angel

message: I do not understand the reason for the cleanup tag on this page. It is short, to the point, and cites many references. -- Elaich  talk 07:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The complaint concerned how the images were placed and aligned.  I've fixed that and removed the tag.  Wasted Time R (talk) 23:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did someone really say, "Oh my God" on the cartoon?  I would have thought that wouldn't be allowed at that time.  140.147.236.194 (talk) 18:08, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Public school prayer was still in place in the early 1960s in the U.S., so mentions of God were quite okay.  Wasted Time R (talk) 23:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, public prayer in public schools took place at the time. That wasn't the point of the original comment. The point was that "Oh, my God," would have been seen, at the time, as a comment too risque for the script of a children's cartoon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.22.92.6 (talk) 11:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

text: I'm the original poster in this thread, now posting as a registered Wikipedian (got persuaded to join up--glad I did).  That last comment was right on the mark; I took part in prayer in public schools at least in 1963-1964 (the New York State Regents' Prayer, I think it was called).  But the exclamation "Oh, my God" is quite different; it could be seen as taking the Lord's name in vain, and so many people would object.  There's a famous TV blooper; I think it was Arlene Frances on What's My Line.  Supposedly, when things were typically live, she said, "Oh my God!"  Then she supposedly said, "Oh, my God, I'm not supposed to say 'Oh my God' on Television."  So I have a feeling someone's mis-recalling whatever it was that the Space Angel said.  Uporządnicki (talk) 18:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did he really say that? 

message: This page screams of nonconformity. I don't know the right template to slap onto the main article, but it really sounds like I'm reading someone's personal view on this. --TangoFett (talk) 09:49, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and the reflections about syndication in Italy appear misplaced and poorly written. Why not have reflections about syndication in all countries written in broken English?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.22.92.6 (talk) 11:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not quite Wikipedia-ey
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Bruce1333

message: This Master of Puppets has got ya'll by the balls. Ya'll are nothing but puppets that he is controlling. Ohh well, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. If ya'll wanna be led around on a string
there is nothing that I can do about it. My opinion of wikipedia just hit rock bottom.
Cheers..
Bruce1333 (talk) 07:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've said this before; I'm not controlling anyone here. I call no shots for others. Every editor who is involved came of his or her own free will. So please do not make this out to be a conspiracy when it isn't; instead, it would be greatly appreciated if you were willing to discuss the matter civilly. It doesn't have to be with myself in particular. What do you say? Thanks, Master of Puppets Care to share? 07:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Bruce1333 has now been blocked indefinitely.  Should this request now be closed as moot?  If the block prevents Bruce from editing here, he would not be able to participate further, and out of fairness to him it should be closed.  Kablammo (talk) 12:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 15:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we consider it resolved? The main goal was for Bruce1333 to stop disrupting that article, which has been achieved. Master of Puppets Care to share? 16:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed. --Black Butterfly (talk) 19:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggest removal and archiving, per Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct#Closing_and_archiving.  Kablammo (talk) 23:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect of block
Talk:Florida Department of Health

message: * "Apéndice B Dónde Acudir para Solicitar Ayuda."
** "Departamento de Salud de Florida" (usually it is "de la Florida")
WhisperToMe (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish name

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Stop the Spread. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 2#Stop the Spread until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  —AFreshStart (talk) 00:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Stop the Spread" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:National Parks Board

message: I just corrected a line in the first paragraph of the article to read "...the backbone of the City in a Garden" rather than "...the backbone of our City in a Garden". Reading further, there are several sentences (e.g. the last sentence of the second paragraph, "Enhancing competencies of the industry will support Singapore’s vision of being a City in a Garden") which do not fit Wikipedia's style guide, and appear to be written from the perspective of NParks.
Antermon (talk) 01:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ...that's because most of it was copied directly from NParks' website back in 2012. I've removed the offending copyright violations, though that means there's nearly nothing left. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 04:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page reads like it was written by the National Parks Board 
Talk:List of German composers

message: Removed Hans Zimmer from the list. Film composers do not qualify as contributors to general culture, and therefore should not be placed on a list of Classical composers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.41.51.48 (talk) 20:20, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zimmer 

message: Never heard of him. Notability? --Weissmann (talk) 05:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoshitomo 

message: I deleted Mozart from this list. He was Austrian, not German. ask123 (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted.  Please discuss this on the Mozart talk page. Magic♪piano 21:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Mozart was not German. How can you prove the opposite? caricos Caricos (talk) 10:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Mozart wasn't Austrian either.  Salzburg, his place of birth, was not part of Austria at the time. So if you want to be technical, he was Salzburger, not Austrian or German.  If you're going to remove him from this list, you also should remove Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart from :Category:18th-century German composers, and probably some other categories, including the Austrian ones.  Be prepared for fireworks if you do, there is long-established consensus to include him in both German and Austrian categories and lists.  At a minimum, he spoke German, so this should qualify him for this list considering the German state did not exist at the time. Magic♪piano 20:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mozart was Austrian. 

message: This list contains several erroneous entries. Off the top of my head, Haydn, born in Rohrau, Austria; Mozart, born in Salzburg; and Schubert, born in Vienna. Narky Blert (talk) 15:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Austrian composers
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Slovakia

message: Hello WikiProject Slovakia: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 13:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon 

message: Hi, whoever is translating articles on Slovenian places, please avoid linking common words such as "village", "municipatly", "historical records" (linked to "history"???), and "altitude". 
You're also linking years, which is a no-no.
On en.WP we ration links to the most needed.
Please remember to use an en dash –, not a hyphen -, for year and date ranges. You'll find the en dash button below the edit box.
Making these changes would save us from a lot of work going through your place articles. Tony (talk) 11:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Tony1: Mini-warning, this group page is about Slovakia, doesn' t Slovenia. Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 16:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Dušan Kreheľ Mini-warning, you mean "not" Slovenia, I suppose. Tony (talk) 07:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  OVERLINKING AND DASHES 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:EUHL#Requested move 7 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:EUHL#Requested move 7 January 2024]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:SME (newspaper)#Requested move 9 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:SME (newspaper)#Requested move 9 January 2024]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:National Council (Slovakia)#Requested move 9 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Bensci54 (talk) 17:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:National Council (Slovakia)#Requested move 9 February 2024]]
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Slovakia/Archive 1

message: I read this article and its says: "They were probably identical or constituted a significant part of the archaeological Púchov culture, with the center in Havránok." According to Szabó Miklós, this can't be true. So you should mention that there are other opinions in this matter too.
Cotini celts also lived in northern Hungary. Near my hometown (Miskolc) they had a fortificated village (its not decided it can say oppidum-- the place called Nagysánc), and near Sajópetrii they had a forging village. There are cotini findigs, coins in the museum of miskolc (Hermann Otto Museum). 
As i know, the cotini tribe was located beetween osii and anartii tribes. They probably arriwed here with the boii, around 400BC. After Burepista dacian invasion they was taken dacian cultural elements. They started to give dacian names. 
Your article is very good, thaks, i was happy when i find it. Sorry for my bad english. user: Derszu 13:38, 31 December 2007. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Derszu (talk • contribs) 13:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cotini
Talk:Yahia al-Houthi

message: Why's the religion Twelver Shia? Any reference for that? If not, like his father & brothers, he should be a Fiver (Zaidi) Shia. XoXo (talk) 12:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twelver?
Talk:The Guidon

message: Uhm the GUIDON does not necessarily have or use GUIDON BLUE anymore... --58.69.63.35 (talk) 12:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the notice. If the person still wants to delete the article, do so via WP:PROD or WP:AFD. --Howard the Duck 15:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ataollah Salehi

message: His military rank is Sarlashkar in Persian. Lashkar means division and Sarlashkar means Divisional General which equals Major General. At this time this is the highest military rank that one live person holds. After death of two of Iranian Major Generals (Mohammadvali Qarani and Ali Sayyad Shirazi) their ranks improved to Sepahbod (Corps General or Lieutenant General). 109.162.214.99 (talk) 10:27, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  His military rank 
Talk:Dichotic listening test

message: To begin with, there are no headings for designated portions of this article.  The article needs to have headings and sections to seperate the different portions of this article to give it a more organized look such as; history of dichotic listening tests, methods of dichotic listening tests, etc...  The lead section is hard to understand because there is really no definite leading section, but this can be edited when the headings appear.  The article gives conscise and clear evidence as to what a dichotic listening test is, with many different reputable sources.  The article is balanced well, along with excellent coverage on the multiple facets to a dichotic listening test.  As earlier stated, the only problem, a big problem at that, in this article was the lack of headings to divide the article up.  Adding that should make for a well rounded and sufficient article. Josh Everett 23:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Laurene Powell Jobs

message: On the Steve Jobs page we can read he has five children (under his photo) and on the Laurene Powell page, it's four. What's the good number? 
: answer Both. He had one daughter out of wedlock, Lisa, earlier.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.135.5.79 (talk) 16:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct number of children is four for Steve, three for Laurene. I added a reference to the article, and Lisa is indeed Steve's love child from a college affair.  Some think he named the Apple Lisa for her.70.22.154.184 (talk) 20:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of children

message: I was wondering is this Bio on Laurene Powell Jobs could be added in external links . 
Thanks Demiherval (talk) 05:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: celebritydaily

message: An editor recently replaced "Powell Jobs" with "Powell-Jobs", a presentation not consistent with the references. If anyone knows why the name ought to be hyphenated, please provide references. Otherwise, please don't re-insert the hyphens. Bongomatic 23:39, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphenation 

message: Laurene Powell Jobs seems to have been apart of the "Individual Founding Members" of the Climate Leadership Council, however according to the wayback machine she had disappeared off the founders page sometime around 2020. Raymond4268 (talk) 09:43, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate Leadership Council 

message: Can anyone confirm the wikileaks lab report that shows that he had HIV? Family Guy Guy (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikileaks?
Talk:Composite key

message: I think this page is very unhelpful unless you know full database terminology, in which case you wouldn't need to look it up. Can someone put up an example that would give a normal person an idea of what this is?  --67.125.22.141 (talk) 08:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: WTF is a simple key?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.115.100 (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF is a simple key? 

message: This is, at best, a paragraph or two worth of information that should be presented in a subsection of the Unique key article.  Recommend merging this article into that one. 69.116.234.82 (talk) 02:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend merge with [[Unique key]] 

message: 1. It seems wrong that a compound key is made up of simple keys, as a compound key is itself a minimal superkey, e.g. any of its proper subsets must not be a simple key. From what the example below suggests, it's more plausible to say that a compound key is made up of two or more foreign keys (that are not simple keys, but it's almost always the case I guess ?). 
2. It's also odd to write "simple (foreign) keys": they are not synonyms.
According to the two points above, I permit myself to change "simple (foreign) keys" to "foreign keys". As I'm by no means a DB expert, feel free to rollback or make it clearer. Unfortunately, I don't have references to support my thoughts, but something definitely goes wrong in the first point. FirminMartin (talk) 18:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compound key
Talk:List of From Dusk till Dawn characters

message: Get rambling with the discussions! -- ₪ SETH GECKO ¥ Give me a conversation  ƒ  My Contributions ¥| ₪ —Preceding comment was added at 08:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone put the pictures in <gallery>?174.3.103.39 (talk) 23:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.174.3.103.39 (talk) 05:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki><gallery></nowiki> 

message: This page is redundant, easily merged into the relevant movie pages. Lots42 (talk) 01:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge