Talk:MSN Groups

message: Parts of this sound like advertisement ("another cool feature...", etc.).  --Jim Henry | Talk 15:47, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to change it to make it sound like an article. Sorry if I made a mess of the article. • Thorpe •
re: "Another Cool Feature"  That was how MSN referred to the various features, it isn't advertisement at all . . . anyone who has used MSN Groups would recognize that lingo and find it acceptable.  Nuttybird2000 (talk) 11:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

message: Hello. I wrote an article about a related topic, Google Groups. As a new Wikipedia writer, I would appreciate any feedback on my article. Please help me by posting your feedback at the Wikipedia:Article Feedback Desk. If you wrote an article and are seeking feedback on it, please post your article at the Article Feedback Desk as well. If you could suggest better ways for me to seek feedback on my article, do leave a note at my talk page.  --J.L.W.S. The Special One 12:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeking feedback on [[Google Groups]] article

message: --R4ncid 07:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are SmartGroups and GROU.PS notable enough? 

message: Poor information on the future of MSN groups, is this needed? its just an opinion and why add your name after adding content it doesnt benifit the article what so ever? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by R4ncid (talk • contribs) 18:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Information 

message: This page is just bullet points, should this be more of an article?
--R4ncid 18:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullet Points? 

message: Removed kewl Chat spamming the article. Please make sure a group has reason to be Notable. --R4ncid 07:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Groups 

message: I'd like to ask whoever keeps adding that to stop. Your personal opinions are irrevelvant to the article. You're on Wikipedia now, not Groups, and you're detracting from the professional nature of this site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.12.17 (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just checked the logs for the MSN Groups article and YOU are the one who is ALSO warring with others in the article. I have accordingly given you ALL two warnings and if you persist with this warring, you will be BANNED by an Admin! --Visa2007 08:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MY APOLOGIES! When I checked the history, etc earlier I could have sworn that it showed that you were also spamming/vandalizing, however when I just checked again, this is NOT the case and I sincerely apologise for any upset, etc caused to you. As you stated, you were only reverting the vandalism from the others. Time for an eye test for me I think! I have also just removed the warning from your Talk Page. SORRY! --Visa2007 05:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Group Wars' 

message: I am having a lot of difficulty using these groups. First of all, I can't get the MSN Groups homepage to even load. Secondly, when sending a message to a group, I receive an "Hmmm, We Can't Find that Page..." error. Thirdly, about every third page I navigate to is missing its stylesheet, so all I see is the stripped-down HTML minus backgrounds, images, special fonts, etc. What a load of crap! SharkD (talk) 02:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buggy 

message: There's a link to World Groups on this page but it redirect us to MSN Groups. Duh! 70.81.167.56 (talk) 03:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Groups 

message: I for one will *NEVER* forgive MSN for cutting MSN-groups in such a callous and uncaring fashion. 
It has been a few years now but I'm still incensed by this completely unfeeling act - MSN appeared to give not a fig about these groups and the people who use them - these people were just ditched like a soiled undergarment! Surely MSN could have sold the whole bundle (as is) to some other unit.  Why did they develop a new product that they knew was going to be completely incompatible with their currently running MSN-groups??? It was premeditated and they didn’t care.  I guess they thought people would just re-sign up to the new version of their groups.  I think they miscalculated badly.
I think all their MSN-groups users simply moved to Facebook, I never looked back!!  If the new groups was intended to compete with Facebook – nice own goal!!
I'd never use another MSN social media site ever again, given the way they just dumped all their users last time.  
I’d be interested to know the figures on how many users MSN had (on MSN-groups) before it closed, and how many users they now have on the new version of MSN-groups (or whatever it is called now, Live???) and how many still use the migration site (multiply??) <Still Angry, you’d never guess!> - 118.127.16.226 (talk) 08:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MSN - NEVER Forgiven