Talk:Ventricular fibrillation

message: This was a dump from my thesis and needs some major editing which i hope to do soon. I also need or someone else may like to do a more detailed discussion of the drug management of VF Dokane 15:59, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Great job! Recently I have contributed a similar (though smaller) project about immunosuppressive drugs and am sure that it took you a couple of hours to put it up. I see that you're no longer active on Wikipedia. What a pity! --Eleassar777 20:17, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree completely. Many things should be removed. --Eleassar  my talk 10:54, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What evidence is there for the "few seconds" claim in the first paragraph.  I know of a case where the VF continued for > 10 min. without causing death.
70.224.37.115 (talk) 02:06, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "few seconds" 

message: Maybe slightly more(not much) is needed in lead para ( moved form intro para.)--Light current 23:51, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  User 68.184.84.240 modified the lead section at 23.17, 22 June 2007 to include the words "and tachycardia may result". This is quite incorrect and I suspect the writer was referring to ventricular tachycardia resulting from atrial fibrillation; thus I have deleted the words.Geoffrey Wickham 02:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead para  

message: I think this article could really benefit from some clear description of symptoms. -- Hinotori(talk)|(ctrb) 12:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symptoms 

message: This I think is an important procedure that can reverse VF if done properly that people should be aware of.  It has the potential for saving lives, not unlike the Heimlich maneuver. 67.185.99.246 01:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added precordial thump 

message: I think the sections:
# 6 Re-entry
# 7 Abnormal automaticity
# 8 Triggered activity
need a bit more context, maybe they should be integrated into mechanism or something, they just seem a little out of place. cyclosarin (talk) 01:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: WHERE IS THE ECG CHARACTERISTICS AT???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.106.153.176 (talk) 18:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ECG CHARACTERISTICS 

message: In regard to the two EKG images shown, Lead II rhythm generated ventricular fibrilation VF.JPG, and EKG VF.jpg, I'd like to suggest a new image example be found. My suggestion is one of comparison, between what normal ventricular activity should look like, and what ventricular fibrillation looks like. There's nothing wrong with the images shown that I'm aware of, but I think it would help those who, like myself, are unfamiliar with this subject. Christopher, Salem, OR (talk) 10:43, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, I am really surprised the article lacks a comparison of EKG of a normal heart and fibrillating heart.  --ChetvornoTALK 11:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  EKG Images 

message: Edited image shown at Basic Life Support, had no relation to anything there.Smlbstcbr (talk) 15:00, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 5 February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:EKG VF.jpg Nominated for Deletion