lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yasim Muhammed Basardah

message: Whatever this thing is, it has no beginning, middle and end. No narrative flow, logic, or explanations. It is a collection of notes, perhaps of interest to someone, but not at all informative. Wikipedia is not the place to find out anything about the subject of this "article."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.5.230.19 (talk) 21:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not an article

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 05:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Yasim Muhammed Basardah. IQinn (talk) 14:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 
Talk:Yasin Qasem Muhammad Ismail

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 12:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]]. 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Yasin Qasem Muhammad Ismail. IQinn (talk) 13:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 
Talk:Yunis Abdurrahman Shokuri

message: The DoD seems to be conflating Groupe Islamiste Combatant Du Maroc with Jamat Mujahedeen Maroc.
They also state that GICM was founded in Sudan in 1995, while JMM was founded in 1999 in Peshawar, Pakistan.  That is inconsistent.  Rather than speculate as to what the DoD really meant I think we should just report the competing assertions, without comment.
*It would be a violation of WP:SYNTH to explain to readers that the two groups are distinct, different groups.
*It would be a violation of WP:SYNTH to explain to readers that the two groups are just one group.
On the other hand the analysts frequently tied the initials GICM to the Moroccan Islamic Fighting Group, so I think it is OK to assume these refer to the same group.
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 22:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflating [[Groupe Islamiste Combatant Du Maroc]] with [[Jamat Mujahedeen Maroc]]?
Talk:Zaid Muhamamd Sa'id Al Husayn

message: I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.
People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do.
Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.
And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are. 
Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.
Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first. 
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 04:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: JimCubb (talk) 20:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names
Talk:Tail of the Sun

message: Lot of people editing the article with references from GameInformer.com's Super Replay episode of this game. Probably should be protected for the time being. Previously, Overblood wiki page was "vandalized" after they featured it in a Super Replay. 70.59.243.153 (talk) 21:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection
Talk:I Got Rhythm

message: What about It was originally written as a slow song for Treasure Girl (1928)?
To be dropped in the first place, until it was modified in 1930?
Or are there traces of it in Treasure Girl?
--80.109.76.103 (talk) 15:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ”... originally ...“ – and then?
Talk:Zaid Binsallah Mohammed Il Bhawith

message: I am reverting this edit.  
I asked the individual who added the "al Qaeda member" category to this and a bunch of other articles to explain why they were adding the individuals to the categories.
Some of the other individuals were alleged to be al Qaeda members, or allegedly confessed to being members.  But Ziyad Al Bahooth was not alleged to have acknowledged to being an al Qaeda member.  He was not alleged to have been an al Qaeda member.  He was alleged to have been the target of recruiters.  He was alleged to have been named on a suspicious list.  I reverted this categorization because I suggest it is too speculative to comply with policy.  Geo Swan (talk) 02:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I refer you to material contained in the body of the article, specifically "One of the detainee's known aliases was on a list of captured al Qaida members that was discovered on a computer hard drive associated with a senior al Qaida member." RayTalk 02:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I responded on RayAYang's talk page, because they made basically the same edit to dozens of articles.  Basically I regard the allegations as merely claims, not facts.  I would have no problem including this article in something like :Category:Saudi Arabians suspected of being members of al Qaeda.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:47, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation 

message: This article is one of a series that had a number of valid and useful wikilinks removed with an edit summary "unlink interpretation of questionable source".
I don't think this is a sufficient explanation, and I don't think this removal of wikilinks was a good idea.
I think the wikilinks should be restored to this article and the other articles.  Geo Swan (talk) 02:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Already explained and under discussion here and in a related discussion here as you know that. I have told you that and i have ask you multiple times in a friendly way to continue the discussion and to answer my questions. here and here and on other places. I would appreciate if you could do so. Thank you IQinn (talk) 09:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of valid and useful wikilinks
Talk:Zohair Abdul Mohammed Al-Shorabi

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Zuhail Abdo Anam Said al Sharabi. IQinn (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:I Know What I Like (In Your Wardrobe)

message: Genesis_discography shows that there was a song charting before this; but I am not sure how to change the lead. Thoughts welcome.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.9.7.20 (talk) 14:58, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reword lead? 

message: I added captions/subtitles to the audio clip :File:Genesis - I Know What I Like (In Your Wardrobe).ogg.  (The subtitles can be seen at TimedText:Genesis - I Know What I Like (In Your Wardrobe).ogg.en.srt.)  However, when I play the clip in this article, the "CC" menu still says "No text tracks available".  How can we get the text to appear in this player?  --Mr. Lance E Sloan (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm really not sure. Do you have any similar example of where the CCs work fine? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  captions for audio clip?
Talk:The Dapper Dans

message: Should we really list their television appearances? Still, we should clean it up from what it looks like now. SportsFan411 15:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I expanded "references in popular culture" to "Film and Television Apperances".  As it is now, there are a good deal of them left out.  As far as the look goes, which edit are you referring to?  It's difficult to tell with 68.231.103.79's changes. --Joemorf 20:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film and Television Apperances 

message: In the edit of May 11, 2012 by Esrever the reason given for removal of the names of various Dapper Dans was "rmv "History"; WP isn't a place to catalogue non-notable people who were one-time members of the group". However, the edit shows that Esrever left a great many non-notable Dapper Dans on the page (e.g. subs for 2 years or less) and removed the founding members of the quartet, and the lineup that existed almost uninterrupted from the late 80's until 2006, who are by any reasonable metric notable Dapper Dans. What's the happy medium here?
:I left what appeared to be current members of the group in the list, since that at least seems like encyclopedic information. Cataloguing old members of the group doesn't strike me as encyclopedic, especially because none of the people would merit a WP article on their own. A full history of the group's membership belongs on an outside website, not Wikipedia. Esrever (klaT) 21:49, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also going to delete the names of the various group members who made media appearances. The group itself is notable; the names of the gentlemen who made one brief appearance in one episode of a TV show in the 1960s are not. Esrever (klaT) 21:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely at least the founding members are notable, perhaps moreso than the current lineup?  Powers T 00:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, that seems logical. If someone wants to add the founding members, knock yourself out. Esrever (klaT) 01:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: From the previous posts in this thread, it appears that the founding members were already listed, and you removed them.  Powers T 17:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel Revisions
Talk:Treasure Hunter G

message: The main characters are the brothers Red, and Blue, a girl Rain, and a monkey Ponga who would later go on to appear in one of Square's earlier PlayStation games, SaGa Frontier, albeit with radically different roles.
Well, it's widely suspected that Red and Blue in SF are a homage to THG, given that they look fairly similar, but it isn't certain they were so intended, to the bset of my knowledge. But are you saying Rain and Ponga appear in SF? If so, where in the game do they?129.234.4.76 (talk) 12:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red and Blue 

message: , have any sources for this? Perhaps offline sources? czar 20:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Review in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Reference_library/GameFan. - hahnchen 20:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  , anything else (like enough sources to not send it to AfD)? czar 21:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to send any article to AFD. - hahnchen 21:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I know, but the point of due diligence is that I'd prefer to avoid that, if possible czar 21:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I added 1up's write  up on the game to the article directly, and I added several print magazine reviews and previews from European, American, and South America to the ref ideas section on the talk page above. This game seems to fall under notable based on just American-Euro sources, but it's also not exactly a fan favorite, so no one wants to really expand the article. Harizotoh9 (talk) 04:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source search
Talk:Witchaven II: Blood Vengeance

message: --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 12:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover need 
Talk:I Love Your Smile

message: Hello,
I modified an entry on I Love Your Smile under the "Cover version" section. A reference was requested for the version of the song by the band Goblin Cock
The song is listed as track 1 on Spotify via the following link:
https://open.spotify.com/album/5bGwqB6Pw5fMa1Ab5vwncM  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tdanza (talk • contribs) 06:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Falmouth, Maine

message: I am again removing material, in good faith, that I consider to be objectionable.  It has WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK issues, as well as having no source cited.  It is simply not written in a tone appropriate to an encyclopedia article.  This removal is not intended as vandalism, and I do not believe it constitutes it. JamesofMaine 22:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not vandalism 

message: One of the towns largest industries is the lobster industries. There are many lobstermen who fish out of town landing in Falmouth, some examples of good lobstermen are Tim Hanley, Dan Hanley, Jerry Grondin, and Michael Chase. Another lobsterman is Kellen Macdonald but he is bad at lobstering.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.75.154.235 (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industry 
Talk:I Remember You (1941 song)

message: The Ifield and Lamour versions aren't the same song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a01:cb18:2ba:e300:2942:85f9:3661:a48f (talk) 08:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure aren't. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Ifield != Lamour
Talk:Stiliyan Petrov

message: This page was moved to Stiliyan Petrov, as Stiliyan is the correct spelling of the player's first name.
Stilian Petrov now redirects to Stiliyan Petrov. Fedgin 13:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname

message: Is it necessary to have details of the debut game for Aston Villa?? John Paul Rennie 09:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aston Villa 

message: (Everlast1910 19:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested photo

message: He's playing again for a non-league team. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30067565 Ezza1995 (talk) 14:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It is for an over-35 section side in a very low level league so he is still retired. Any caps for a 'category team' should not be included in the same way that under-19 and under-21 appearances are not counted. Mountaincirque 18:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing again in non-league 
Talk:I See the Moon

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: In this little-edited backwater of Wikipedia, I get the feeling that this is the sort of query that will go answered until after I'm dead. However, here goes: if you listen to both the Mariners' version and the Stargazers' version, it's apparent that the latter is parodying the former - at least the style of the former, if not the specific recording. Which suggests that the Stargazers expected their audience to already be familiar with either the Mariners' version, or some other version(s) copying it. So, how were people familiar with it? Was the Mariners' version, or some British cover of it, popular on radio? Was a recording, or recordings, selling just not quite well enough to register on the top 20? Was the song common in the repertoire of live bands in the winter of 1953/4? --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 09:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The UK experience 

message: Removed a section that cited 2 Vincenzo Bellini works as origins of the melody. No reliable source was cited, ergo a conclusion of an editor, ergo violation WP:OR. Further, I listened to the works, and while there are similarities, the editor's statement is every bit as unjustified as the Blurred Lines lawsuit verdict! Tapered (talk) 04:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bellini allusions
Talk:I Should Have Known Better (Jim Diamond song)

message: I think that there is a mistake in the article where this song is mentioned to be displace by Band Aid's song. It was displaced by FGTH's Power of Love ---Malteseman1983 (talk) 22:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline of Uk No.1 Single 
Talk:Alexandru Marin (physicist)

message: The content recently added to this page was for the most part copied verbatim from this Web page, with some wikilinks added.  It gives enough information to convince me to take off the importance tag, but can't remain in its present form.  I've removed it for the time being, and at some point hope somebody will use the information in it to write a legal article.  I'll try to do so myself but can make no guarantees.  -David Schaich Talk/Cont 22:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have rewritten the information such that it should no longer constitute a copyvio. -David Schaich Talk/Cont 23:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 
Talk:I Try

message: The article currently says nothing about why Ms Gray wore them when you are not here. Wyddgrug (talk) 20:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goggles 
Talk:I Wanna Talk About Me

message: His name is Aderoju Mathew is a Nigerian disk jockey his stage name is DJ splash aka Da turntable monster  DJ Splash Daturntable monster (talk) 17:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  DJ Splash  

message: His name is Aderoju Mathew is a Nigerian disk jockey his stage name is DJ Splash aka Da turntable monster  DJ Splash Daturntable monster (talk) 17:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  DJ Splash
Talk:Sándor Torghelle

message: Does anyone really pronounce his name as [ˈʃaːndor ˈtorɡˌhɛlːɛ]? AFAIK, in Hungarian an unvoiced h would normally devoice the consonant preceding it (g -> k), but I highly doubt anyone would pronounce that [h] anyways. 89.132.227.156 (talk) 23:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:If I Knew You Were Comin' I'd've Baked a Cake

message: I've removed the to be honest about it completely incorrect phrase that Gracie Fields' version is the most well known which obviously anywhere outside England was complete rubbish.Talk about a Little Englander mentality and I thought thought Americans had the monopoly on arrogance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.91.83 (talk) 13:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No Lyrics? Can't sing this without lyrics to my baby. 72.148.31.114 (talk) 18:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the article mention that the lyrics are, in fact, ungrammatical? They use the wrong sequence of tenses. Corrected, it would be "If I'd known you were coming...". Kelisi (talk) 06:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The lyrics aren't strictly ungrammatical, they just follow the grammar of a nonstandard variety of English. I had a Portuguese-language teacher in college who made the same objection, though, and made sure the students got equivalent conditional constructions in Portuguese correct. —Mahāgaja · talk 10:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  >Grammar 

message: This phrase was used in the 1937 3 Stooges short “Cash and Carry”. Was the phrase common before the song, and where did it come from? 2601:647:5800:7D80:4046:CEC:C486:33E0 (talk) 05:36, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Time?
Talk:If You're Not the One

message: I love this song. Sorry. Amit 16:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Song
Talk:If You Don't Know Me by Now

message: Patti Labelle recorded it for her 1985 album Patti.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8D:8601:ED0:8D5D:5602:69F0:C910 (talk) 10:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

message: * What is this song about (summary)?
* What rhythm is it (slow waltz?)?
* this song apt for a wedding service?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.60.62.213 (talk) 15:15, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Amen to that. Typically awful Wikipedia song article, says nothing about the actual music, just versions this and charts that. 70.192.83.88 (talk) 22:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for further information 

message: I think Rush Limbaugh has a satirical version of the song used as a "theme" for Presidential candidate/Arizona Sen. John McCain.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 20:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rush Limbaugh Usage 

message: The original version of this song is extremely well-known, and it has been covered numerous times by many artistes. Therefore, I wonder why Simply Red's version been given so much prominence?Centrepull (talk) 11:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Simply Red version is well-known because it was an international hit (see "charts" section) and thus deserves its own section. Remember that an article is always under construction on WP. The goal of a song article is to have detailed info about every notable version. So it should be good to expand the sections about the original version and the subsequent covers. -- Europe22 (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's only a track list and chart section that makes it appear that the Simply Red version is prominence.  Remember as well, it's all what information people have access to.  The more recent something is, the more info people can find on it. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 20:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simply Red 

message: There is no chart number listed for Australia. 
Did it chart in Australia? Or was this a copy paste from another info box IceCuba (talk) 18:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia charting position
Talk:In Love with Love

message: There's no mention of the saw remix! It was huge! Pretty sure it was a hit in the UK. What's going on ? Kernel geek (talk) 10:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: SAW remix