lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:France under the Third Republic

message: This article is an orphan among the articles on French history:
it's not linked from almost anywhere, most particularly not
from , History of France,
France in the nineteenth century, or France in modern times.
Nor do there exist corresponding articles France under the First Republic,
France under the Second Republic, etc.  Rather, the whole organization
of French history articles expects to find the history of a period
under the name of its government, and links all over the wiki expect the same.
If someone (SimonP?) wants to reorganize the treatment
of French history and make everything well-linked, I won't object;
but if this is to remain an orphan I'm going to merge it into French Third Republic
in the next few days.
Greg Price 20:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge it. Definitely. Furthermore, there is already France in the Modern Times (1920-today) and France in the Modern Times (1789-1920) which also overlap (if we're not careful, the French Third Republic is going to overlap with both - the dates aren't good, they don't fit. I think somebody created the two France I and II following a textbook, not necessarily a bad idea, but not really logic either (why does 1920 breaks the two articles? It would be lot more logical to make the history articles according to the regimes 
(French Third Republic, Vichy regime, French Fourth Republic and French Fifth Republic). Tazmaniacs 05:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge to [[French Third Republic]]
Talk:Kojo Annan

message: Kojo Annan is not the son of Nanne Annan!
His mother is Kofi Annan's Nigerian ex-wife.
Where does this false information come from?
--Bab from the Esperanto Wikipedia 
:You certainly appear to be correct - see for example . I have removed this false factoid from this article, and also Kofi Annan and Nane Annan. —Stormie 22:40, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
-- "With the Nigerian.."?  Sounds ridiculous, almost insulting.  I'll patch it up.
I removed this link: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1462576,00.html, since it was broken when tried. 213.46.11.158 17:00, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Top Secret!

message: "Slightly backward"?
Nicely put — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.73.94.13 (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the see also section here lists the names of a few of the characters in the movies but those not explain that; furthermore, their names are linked to articles for the things the characters are named after and this makes no sense. for example, the section has entries for Chocolate mousse and Déjà vu and links to those articles, but it does not say anything about the fact that they are characters. as it is now, it is very confusing unless you have seen the movie.
i suggest that either an explanation is added and the section renamed or that its deleted althogether. --uri budnik 01:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: See also section needs an explanation

message: As I disclosed in my edit summary I removed the part about East Germany being run by Nazis.  They are communists, and welcome a Soviet opera singer to the cultural festival at the same time Nick Rivers is there.  The French Resistance, while they did in reality fight the Nazis, I don't think is supposed to make sense in a literal historical way, but rather just for comic relief.  The French Resistance was in France, after all, and not Germany, during WWII.
:I believe that while the movie is ostensibly set in East Germany, the actual uniforms and stereotypes resemble those of Hollywood Nazis and Germans in WWII. So it's actually a mix of the two, Nazis and East German commies. There are even SS-like uniforms! 201.231.81.53 (talk) 05:44, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it's definitely both. That's part of the joke. Here's a few links   --AW (talk) 06:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nazis in ''Top Secret!''?

message: The article claims O.J. to be in the movie. In the commentary on the dvd Zucker, Abrahams, Zucker reveal, that all black actors were British and had to be teached how to give a "high five".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.180.75.151 (talk) 11:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Error 

message: Is there room for a list of specific movies Top Secret parodies? "Elvis films" are mentioned, but what about, say, The Blue Lagoon?
Pica Pusher (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Room for parodies list and/or links? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :To psecret!. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 27#To psecret! until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Dominicmgm (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "To psecret!" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Leek and Manifold Valley Light Railway

message: IS there a camp site still at Wetton village? The one on NT land at Wetton Mill, a lovely spot, has gone some years back. 14:45, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: ...using half-width icons. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:37, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route diagram suggestion 
Talk:Emperor Gaozu of Tang

message: What was the time he was born, like, A.D. or B.C.?
:It's A.D. as all Tang events are A. D.. At times he's overshadowed by his son to such an extent they say his son founded the dynasty, but was "fillial pious" enough to let his father rule first. That's either exaggerated or just not true. I might expand this page tonight.--T. Anthony 23:37, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Alas my books didn't have much. Perhaps sometime later.--T. Anthony 01:09, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, when defining a year before 'Christ', you put BC behind it. However, when it's AD, it's not officially required to put AD behind the year. You could do it, but I think one or two times would suffice, and the rest of the dates you could write down without AD. (But always write down BC).Tal.beelen (talk) 09:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Tkorrovi and Paul Beardsell/Evidence

message: I do not think tkorrovi quite understands what is punishable as a "personal attack". Saying "So you say but you are not an authoritative source" is not a personal attack; there are other comments like that, which I'm sure the community wouldn't construe as a personal attack... ugen64 15:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a "personal attack"?
Talk:Pinafore

message: are inappropriate on this page, which exists solely to describe an article of clothing. Pinafore eroticism has its own page, and you are welcome to expound on fetishes there, as necessary. The Editrix 14:12, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What appears to be the same user has been trying to create the same article several times (and seems unwilling to allow other editors to make any changes), and has inserted the content into several existing articles - see Talk:Petticoat_Punishment and Talk:Petticoat_Discipline for more information. Mdwh 20:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good edit, Mdwh. Thanks. (Will you be my sockpuppet? <grin>) The Editrix 00:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated attempts to expand "eroticism" 

message: The article currently says, "H.M.S. Pinafore, a comic opera by Gilbert and Sullivan, uses the word in its title, creating a humorous portmanteau."  Can someone explain to me what that "portmaneau" is? - Nunh-huh 02:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: my denseness

message: Scrimmage vests (sleeveless pullovers) are often referred to as pinnies and sold as such.  Might be worth adding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.74.86.1 (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinnies in sports 

message: This article mentions only the wearing of pinafores by girls and women; shouldn't there be something about their use in earlier times by young boys (e.g. from Peter and Wendy: "[Michael] still wears the pinafores young Edwardian boys wear")?  Most other articles about articles of clothing discuss their historical use, including use by the gender other than the one that commonly uses them now.  John Darrow (talk) 20:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical usage by boys
Category talk:Elfquest

message: Regarding the recent revert it should be noted that while DC Comics was not the original publisher of the ElfQuest series it is currently publishng the current series as well as owns the licence to the ElfQuest title (as noted in List of Elfquest publications). Regardless you may want to consider listing the ElfQuest category under a more specific one such as Comic book titles. 205.188.116.132 15:18, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2005
Talk:Modern geocentrism/Archive 1

message: I carefully went through every one of Truth_Seeker's edits. None of them were scientific and a few were absolutely incorrect. For example, the CMB(R) (Note: everyone in the field who does research on the microwave background calls it the CMB) paragraph contained aggregious factual errors (such as saying that nobody knows the origin of the CMB). More than that, the CMB restframe being different from Earth's does not seem to be a reasonable proof of geocentrism to me. 67.172.158.8 08:15, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion of Truth_Seeker's last edit

message: Truth_Seeker, your reversions and edits are consistently problematic and incorrect. This is the third time in two days I've had to revert back to a previous version because your version is incorrect. Lense-Thirring IS a part of GR: read the article that refers to it if you don't believe me. 67.172.158.8 21:32, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truth_Seeker needs to stop editting 

message: There is nothing cosmological about it. It makes no predictions that distinguish it as a cosmology, nor does it state anything about any of the cosmological implications of its practice. If you want to categorize it as "religious dogma" or even "creation science", fine, but it isn't cosmology. 128.138.96.220 20:27, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Geocentrism is not cosmology 

message: Geocentrists reject the notion that the CMB is a preferred reference frame, since in the Geocentric system, the CMB is [likely] rotating, and thus could not be considered inertial. Also, Geocentrists realize that in mapping the CMB, scientists needed to make the explicit assumption that the earth was rotating in order to process the data (remove asymmetric dipoles).
What geocentrists believe, does not belong in the "The [contrary] modern scientific point of view" section. Besides, neither statement makes sense. Art Carlson 10:26, 2005 Feb 18 (UTC)
* Sungenis, Robert, private correspondence.
Listing "private correspondence" as a "General Reference" is completely useless. Is that supposed to be an invitation to contact Sungenis if I want more information? Art Carlson 10:26, 2005 Feb 18 (UTC)
:I agree.  This is not an acceptable reference for Wiki. 203.213.77.138 05:48, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion of anonymous edits of 2005-02-18
Category talk:WaRP Graphics titles

message: Hang on a second...all Warp ever published was the Elfquest series! --InShaneee 15:26, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *Actually I believe they've published a number of titles, although admittedly short lived and less popular then the ElfQuest series, over the past 25-30 years. MadMax 21:27, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Elfquest?
Talk:Pierre Mailloux

message: This page was previously listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. With new information, the nominator rescinded its nomination, and the result of the vote was to keep. You may view an archive of the vote at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Pierre Mailloux. Samaritan 16:13, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've noticed, and never knew before, that he is missing part of one of his legs. I knew though he was often walking with its crutches without noticing the missing portion of the leg. Does anyone know about what happen to him? A form of cancer or something, was he involved in a accident which amputed part of its leg? Thanks!--Booyah! 22:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Leg - a question

message: The grammar and spelling in this sentence is disgusting:
In 1975, after serving in the Canadian Forces as a psychiatrist, he started to work with offenders who've committed assaults and worked on many projects as an expert psychiatrist. participated at numerous travail as an expert on the psychatric domain.
Now, I'm not sure how I should go about fixing this mess. He started to work with offenders where, and they violated which law? What kind of assault, sexual? "Worked on many projects" is too vague, everybody works on projects an any given time. Same for the "travail"s (works) on the "psychatric" (psychiatric) domain. Maybe we should strip everything except that he served in the Canadian Forces? 66.130.179.31 22:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disgusting grammar
Talk:A-law algorithm

message: The  green  straight  line  corresponds  to  no  companding...
192.54.144.226  08:11,  22  August  2006  (UTC)Denis
:  Whoops  -  You  are  right  -  It's  fixed  now  Ozhiker  08:35,  22  August  2006  (UTC)
The graph gives now the impression that not every linear signal value is mapped into a quantized value. This impression is incorrect because ofcourse for every input there will be a quantized output. Bob.v.R (talk) 05:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   Legend  of  the  graph  uses  wrong  colours  

message: I think it would be interesting for readers to learn about the origin / history of the µ and A in the terms µ-law and A-law. Do we have any WP:RS for this?
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of μ and A in names? 

message: As I also just commented on the Mu-Law talk page - shouldn't the blue and red lines also start at 0:0, same as the green one, as these are all digital systems? An analogue setup doing the same may produce over-unity signals, but in this context either anything over 0dB will get clipped, or the whole line needs to be shifted to the right (on this chart) to normalise 0dB "encoded" with 0dB input/output and avoid that? 92.12.87.15 (talk) 18:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin point for A/mu Law lines on chart questionable?
Talk:Lesley Whittle

message: Excellent - neutrality dispute and merger suggested and no explanation for either submission! I think the article shows no particular bias, although I am happy that the merger could be beneficial. Lesley's story is wrapped up in Neilson's entirely; and little more was ever known about her. Bentley Banana 03:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation?
Talk:Buyids

message: I tried to wikify as much as I could, but my knowledge of Muslim history is vague at best, and I wasn't sure what alternate names things ought to link to, etc. In addition, the author seemed to be mislabeling centuries, talking about the 9th century, and then moving on to mention years 935 and 986. So I changed the century labels, which may be mistaken; please doublecheck this for me. LordAmeth 17:43, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Brimstone (TV series)

message: 3 November 1998 is the date I have, but why wasn't it 4 November? Rich Farmbrough 17:51, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: ESTA SERIE FOI LANCADA EM DVD?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.18.65.173 (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BRIMSTONE 

message: I remember hearing that they were going to make more episodes of this show, can anyone confirm? The snare (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More episodes
Talk:Rear of the Year

message: Well publicised was; "Aside from a 1996 autobiography detailing the pain behind the last successful years of the band, little has been heard of the flaxen-haired original Rear of the Year. " From for ex:  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreen (talk • contribs) 18:51, 4 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Check facts

message: I have requested page protection for the article as Violetriga's unilateral reverting of my adding a balanced view is against policy. It is not allowed to revert such an edit, rather adding the balanced opposing view to an article is good policy. Also Violetriga has abused the 3 revert rule here and also broken the policy of starting an edit war rather than discussion. Kreen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreen (talk • contribs) 19:24, 4 April 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've examined the page history. Violetriga has reverted twice; how can this an abuse of the three revert rule? With regard to the article content, I agree with VioletRiga here, your addition is opinion/commentary, which is not appropriate here. — Matt Crypto 20:05, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request page protection for article

message: Article says "When Charlotte Church won in 2002 she was 16 (only just above the age of consent), leading to some controversy about the competition." Is this correct? Seems a bit OTT if it is. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 10:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is in fact true (e.g. this article from the Western Mail, this one from the BBC, which makes reference to this article from the Daily Mirror). As of this writing there isn't really a way to put it into the article without it taking up a disproportionate amount of space. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Lots of news coverage: . I don't think notability can be questioned here.--Michig (talk) 06:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coverage 
Talk:Squelch

message: Why should I  suppress the audio (or video) output of a receiver? At the end, i will not receive any signals if i suppress too much! Thanks, --Abdull 18:07, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: Does anyone have any sources of information on this? Google search didn't turn up much of relevance. I'd like to know how it works.K8ARW 20:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  XTCSS 

message: I was once aware of the difference between a Mute and Squelch control - the distinction passing with some of those little grey cells. Doug butler (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mute
Talk:Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution

message: ::: Before signing the legislation to abolish prohibition, President Franklin D. Roosevelt famously quipped, "I think this would be a good time for a beer."
This is a problem since President's don't sign constitutional amendments.  I found a reference to that quote with respect to Cullen-Harrision Act but that was adopted before the 21st Amendment. Roadrunner (talk) 10:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roosevelt quote 

message: Is Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas worth a mention in the "court decisions" section? Particularly Gorsuch's dissent, perhaps? 12.132.53.98 (talk) 17:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas 

message: If anybody can add more on the election of the state conventions in 1933 (campaigns, election dates, election modes, results by state, etc.), it would be very good for this article. 194.39.218.10 (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More history of the election of the state conventions is needed.
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404 3

message: After this case was opened, Rex edited the User talk:216.153.214.94 page, archiving my notice to him of the filing of the RfAr and mav's notice to him of the opening of the case.  He has evidently chosen not to submit evidence or any other response.  Although he was blocked earlier today for 48 hours, that block came more than a week after mav's notice to him. JamesMLane 18:12, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rex is aware of the proceeding
Talk:Fever

message: This part of the article seems way out of left field and quite confusing:
"In adults, the normal range of oral temperatures in healthy individuals is ... 33.2–38.1 °C (91.8–100.6 °F) among women,... "
Both in the Human body temperature and Hypothermia articles say that 33.2 C and 91.8 F are within symptomatic hypothermia range.
1. It is true that the reference given, #36, states:
"The range in oral temperature for men and women, respectively, was 35.7-37.7 and 33.2-38.1 degrees C."
However, there is nothing about why female oral temps would be so much lower than male's. Perhaps the journal published a correction?
2. Normal Body Temperature: A Systematic Review
Ivayla I Geneva, Brian Cuzzo, Tasaduq Fazili, Waleed Javaid 
Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 6, Issue 4, April 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz032
Also: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456186/
In this survey, authors state:
"The quest for understanding human body temperature and defining normothermia is ongoing, as is evidenced by the steady number of published prospective studies depicted in Figure 1A."
Further:
"Finally, our analysis demonstrated only a trivial difference in body temperature between the genders (Table 2 and Figure 1C), with women’s temperature being slightly lower when using all measurements from all measurement sites."
Note that in Table 2, the very few places where female's lower range temps are given in the 33s, they are axillary or tympanic, not the oral temps that appear in reference #36.
3. Assessment of axillary temperature for the evaluation of normal body temperature of healthy young adults at rest in a thermoneutral environment
Shuri Marui, Ayaka Misawa, Yuki Tanaka, and Kei Nagashima 
J Physiol Anthropol. 2017; 36: 18.
Published online 2017 Feb 22. doi: 10.1186/s40101-017-0133-y
This study compared subjects' baseline temps with axillary and tympanic results (with methods). Even the lowest results were not near the values given in this WP article for females.:
"It seems to be accepted that “normal body temperature” is around 37.0 °C on average, although a range around this value (36.2 to 37.5 °C) is considered within normal limits. However, in the present study, the averaged values estimated by axillary temperature measurements using a digital thermometer were lower than the accepted normal value (i.e., 36.2 °C on average). The reason remains unclear." 
4. Comparative Study: Oral temperature differences in relation to thermometer and technique
R Erickson
"Nurs Res". 1980 May-Jun;29(3):157-64.
For your information, this article examines the most effective technique for oral temperature-taking.
Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 07:15, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average temperature for females?
Talk:IEEE802.20

message: What's the difference of IEEE 802.20 to all the other wireless systems like WiMAX, HIPERLAN, WLAN etc.? --Abdull 18:33, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: Feel free to add an 802.20 column to the OFDM#OFDM system comparison table. Mange01 11:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OFDM system comparison table
Talk:Basil McIvor

message: Since when has Pettigo been in Fermanagh?
The small part of it across the border is called, err, umm... I can't remember. But its not called Pettigo anymore. He was born in 1928, meaning he was either born in Pettigo, County Donegal or $BITOFPETTIGORENAMED, County Fermanagh. Kiand 18:36, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Tullyhommon. Thats what the other side of the village is called now. Kiand 18:42, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 
Talk:Medial capital

message: Someone do me the examples. I'm tired! That beautifully written article took a lot outta me, and now I must go back to my economics essay. Such is life, eh? ZephyrAnycon 18:44, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it was a beautiful article.  Unfortunately, the topic already had an article, CamelCase, which is far more accurate and detailed. I have merged the two under CamelCase.  Sorry... "Such is life" indeed in Wikipedia... Jorge Stolfi 16:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples