lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Caipira

message: Yes, there is wrong information. Who reads this article, reads like it is a language. It is nonsence. The differences in pronunciation should be given in IPA, no creating a pseudo-writing system for the dialect based on pronunciation. And the references to Portuguese should be "Standard Portuguese", not just "Portuguese". It is clearly a pseudolinguistic article, I'm sorry. Some days ago, it even had an imaginary language family! Because it is a so particular dialect, there's maybe some information about it, you just need to look for it. No offense but it should be cleaned.  -Pedro 23:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong information

message: Also, I agree that the article is sub-standard as it stands right now, but it is an important article with some relevant information; it should be improved. Especially interesting is the information about the retroflexive "r", as that seems to be a rather rare sound in languages around the world, and even more in Portuguese (probably unique to Caipira).--Cotoco 18:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevant

message: I removed some examples which are completely nonsense, e.g. "musga" and "Ingalaterra". I've lived all my life in the "countryside" of São Paulo and never heard such things. Lenineleal 18:44, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections

message: I'd like to know where the IPA references are coming from as i see no references available, especially since I'm seeing some vowels (like ʊ, ɜ̃) not found on this article here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_phonology ~kp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.26.124.0 (talk) 14:17, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: IPA

message: This article should be deleted; it has nothing to do with reality. Ninguém (talk) 01:38, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a sweeping comment; it would be more helpful if you could point out what's wrong. But it does appear that the article lacks references; currently it has none, and only two external links which may or may not back up the text. — Sebastian 18:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete it

message: After 4 1/2 years, this article is still at stub level. It may make sense to merge this article into a larger one - see discussion at Talk:Brazilian Portuguese#Regional accents. — Sebastian 18:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Caipira is not an ethnicity. Caipira is just the inhabitant of the rural areas of the central and southern regions of Brazil. A group of people with characteristics in common is not necessarily an ethnic group.
The Paulistânia region does not exist. Scheridon (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic group 

message: Please would an interested editor assess the material at User:Kasufcgslfguhvsne/editing/caipira (which seems to have been translated from Portuguese Wikipedia), incorporate what is useful, blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 23:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft
Talk:The Gallery (album)

message: Subjective
Isn't a bit subjective?
----
A bit? Wikipedia is not a music review site. That "review" should be removed.
: done Spearhead 21:38, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dead Marshes

message: The German Ardapedia states that Sindarin for  Dead Marshes (German: Totensümpfe) is Loeg Firn. Can anybody confirm that (i.e., give a source)? (According to the On-line Sindarin search engine and another Sindarin-English dictionary, Loeg = pool / pools (of a marsh), and fern (pl. firn) = dead person, so that translation is at least plausible — 15:16, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's the name of the dead Elf that tries to pull Frodo under in Peter Jackson's The Two Towers? Is it Gil-Galad or someone else? Scorpionman 01:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corpse
Talk:Fort Hancock, New Jersey

message: Fort Hancock is not part of Middletown Township —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.91.22.110 (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fort Hancock, according to Google maps, is located out on Sandy Hook.  The article on Middletown, New Jersey includes a map showing that the township includes all of Sandy Hook.  So, it looks like it is part of Middletown, at least the larger town if not the town center.  If this is not right, please say so again but hopefully could you provide a reference? doncram (talk) 00:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort Hancock/Sandy Hook 

message: I would vote for merging the Battery Potter material into the Fort Hancock article. It would make the Fort Hancock article more substantial. Also, the Battery is part of the Fort and not an independent installation. Acad Ronin (talk) 14:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  I just visited Ft. Hancock today, and, when you're walking from Officers' Row to the 9 gun battery, you pass right by, and can explore, Battery Potter.  The park rangers even give you Ft. Hancock maps and information that contains and explains Battery Potter.  I would say, from my experience, it is very much an integrated part of the Ft. Hancock experience.  CarlsonC (talk) 01:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I am planning to improve this article along the lines of my work on Fort Hamilton, and I think that's a good suggestion. RobDuch (talk) 04:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

text: I will also be including information on the Third System Fort Hancock.RobDuch (talk) 05:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've completed my expansion of this article, anyone still in favor/against merging Battery Potter? RobDuch (talk) 05:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that everything has been covered in the expansion. This page should be changed to a redirect to Fort Hancock, New Jersey. Jim Miller  See me | Touch me 03:28, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, had missed this.  Yes, merging with a permanent redirect makes good sense.  Anmccaff (talk) 22:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Battery Potter

message: The section of wall are not the only remains.  The water tower at the Coast Guard Station is on a corner bastion.  When I was there, someone doing research on the fort told me there was stone masonry in Nine Gun Battery.  The section of wall survived because the Army built storage tanks for minefield control cables against it. 198.147.202.125 (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third System Fort
Talk:Protectant

message: Why should this adjective be only about plants ? Woud recommend AfD or move to wiktionary of this article if it cannot cite the source for it being associated specifically with plants. If it does have to do with plants, it could well redirect to Plant defense of herbivory - section on chemical defense. Shyamal 01:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever added the article perhaps looked at Plant Incorporated Protectants - a term used by the US EPA . Shyamal 01:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary
Talk:Adventure Thru Inner Space

message: I may be missing something, but is there a need for a spoiler warning on a ride that has been closed for 20 years?  Yes, I know this is trivial, but maybe there's something here I'm not aware of, else I'd remove it. Noliver 09:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is the ride-through DVD, though the virtual model.  Someone who has never seen the attraction might want to watch the DVD first, before being spoiled. It's unlikely, I know, but some people really react strongly to spoilers, so I tend to err on the side of caution. ManoaChild 20:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough--Noliver 21:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler Warning? 

message: Is there one?  There should be, and this should be on it.  Besides, I can't find any information about the sky buckets.
----
:Yes, there is a list at List of past Disneyland attractions and the attraction you are looking for is the Skyway. --Lyght 02:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete List of Disneyland Rides that No Longer Exist 

message: "...Walt Disney assigned his staff songwriters, the Sherman Brothers, the task of writing an opening and closing song for the 'Adventure Thru Inner Space' attraction. That song was Miracles from Molecules..."
Actually, the perky, vocalized Miracles from Molecules wasn't heard until the end of the attraction, when you exited the Atomobile and walked through Monsanto's corporate display area. All the other music---the ethereal, ambient instrumental tracks heard in the entryway and on the ride itself---was written by Disney composer Buddy Baker.
(Though I worked in Disney parks for 13 years, my edits here tend to be somewhat anally, and usually incorrectly, reversed---so I'll leave it to you Powers That Be whether to implement this or not.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeAvailableName (talk • contribs) 10:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing song, not opening 

message: "They appear like the Milky Way of our own solar system." Huh? Does this deserve a "sic"?206.130.136.162 (talk) 10:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The narrator really said that?
Talk:Genetic material

message: I don't know that the RNA World Hypothesis is "generally" taken to be correct.  It's a HYPOTHESIS, still in its infancy, and has not gained widespread acceptance or credibility.  RNA is known to be chemically unstable in certain environments and may or not have been the crucial step in abiogenesis. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.197.60.250 (talk • contribs) .
:I think you're right.  It was still very much just a hypothesis last time I read much about it.  You should change it to your satisfaciton.  Peace, delldot | talk 20:15, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Harperchondriac

message: I propose that this article be merged into Seamus Zelazny Harper for the following reasons:
* Duplication
* The article contains very little about Harperchondriacs and talks more about Seamus Harper himself and episodes of Andromeda in which he was central to the plot.
Mikesc86 01:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge per reasons above. RedRollerskate 18:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Juan Pizarro (conquistador)

message: "He was one of the most ruthless, brutal and corrupt conquistadors" - actually there is no proof that Juan was more ruthless, brutal, etc. than other conquistadors. I would suggest more neutral writing.  Jasra 00:00, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 18:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:John Bundrick

message: It would also be nice to find out why his nickname is "Rabbit" and the origins of that —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.146.251.64 (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rabbit? 

message: I couldn't believe that there was no reference section in the article. I added one, and in addition, moved the entire link farm here-- in other words, references that are not added within the text yet, or may need viewing to see if they are admissable there, belong here. No links or sources belong in the External links section! Please place future possibile resources here. When they are either not appropriate for use, or used up, just cross them out like this. Thank you. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 05:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is where sources go!! 

message: I'm not sure why the article didn't have any references. I've added some to the main article, and added (back?) a references section. Is there something I'm missing here? Ross-c (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the references in the article? 

message: Why are those ten albums added by User:McMalcolm not relevant? They are listen on Budrick's own website? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other albums
Talk:German Air Fleets in World War II

message: hi -- this looks like text run through a translator -- the title is grammatically terrible, and the content itself is not super helpful.  Is there somewhere else that the data can be merged, so this page can be deleted?  At a minimum it needs cleanup and renaming.  thanks.  bikeable (talk) 00:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I have moved this article to its current title, and intend to convert it to the table scheme, allowing a lot more information to be presented, in an effort to make it more useful. Andreas 08:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move, new title, etc. 

message: Article reassessed and graded as DAB. --dashiellx (talk) 19:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Brainspawn

message: The Nibblonians' home planet is not "Nibblonia" but identified in both episodes as "Eternium".  I've made the changes, as well as clarifying and expanding the details of the Brainspawn's activities. 24.200.93.175 00:08, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The Brainspawn do not warrent their own article. They only appear in two episodes. Although they do have an important role in the Futurama universe, I can't think of any justification for a two episode set of characters having their own article. Captain Jackson 20:28, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Recurring characters of Futurama
Talk:Complex conjugate of a vector space

message: This topic definitely needs to be contrasted with Dual vector space so that the distinction is clear.  For instance, the last section states that in quantum mechanics, the conjugate to a ket vector is a bra vector, but of course bras are the duals to kets (as it confirms in the article on bra-ket notation.  I assume V \;, \overline V, V^* \;, and \overline V^* are all isomorphic to each other, and the only difference between V^* \; and \overline V is the nature of the isomorphism.  In particular, I think the dual V^* \; is in some sense a "different" vector space than V \; (the space of scalar functions), while the complex conjugate \overline V is literally the same set of vectors V \;, only with V = (v_1, v_2, ...) \; identified with \overline V = (\overline{v}_1, \overline{v}_2^*, ...) \;, where \overline v \; denotes the scalar complex conjugate of v \;.
Could someone more knowledgeable than me make this precise?  69.254.150.148 (talk) 13:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complex conjugate vector space vs.Dual vector space 
Talk:Omar Ali-Shah

message: OK, I know Omar Ali Shah is real - I have one of his books and have seen photos, etc. I even know members of his "group". He translated The Rubbayat with Robert Graves... But I can find almost nothing about him. Then, someone told me 6 months ago that he was dead. Someone added the helpful note that he was still alive to the main article, but I removed it for now.
Anyone with any info?
--Chinawhitecotton 00:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Omar Ali Shah died on September 2nd 2005 at the age of 83. As far as I know, his son Arif (a screenwriter) is now carrying on his father's responsibilities in relation to the tradition and the previous groups seem to be still continuing.
Segovius 12:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agha 

message: I've recently come across a source-bare interview in which Catherine Hayter, interviewed by Edgardo Canton, talks about the early days in Paris under the joint direction of Idries and Omar Ali-Shah before they "agreed to disagree". If anyone has a reference to the original article (publication name, date, page numbers) that would be really, really useful. The Wikipedia articles on Idries Shah and Omar Ali-Shah are lacking mention of the disagreement, groups and exercises. EricT (talk) 17:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've mentioned Augy Hayter's book before, but as it's self-published there's the question of reliability. Have a word with Jayen466. Esowteric+Talk 09:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idries and Omar Ali-Shah: Paris group 
Talk:Oil sludge

message: Regarding the removal of the affected engines list that was made in this edit: 23:14, 24 March 2009 Gump Stump ... (remove list, spam, how-to, tag fact)
No discussion first? Seems that was a fairly major decision that probably deserved some discussion (i.e. the deleted list wasn't relevant? The Center for Auto Safety isn't an acceptable reference?) I think it's appropriate to have a list of affected entities - similar to how the Ford Pinto is linked within the Car fire article. I do agree the external links were mostly junk - Castrol Oil and the MSN Autos links were spam, & datatown.com/chrysler is an outdated mess. OilSludge.com was removed too, okay if you must, but perhaps it would be appropriate to link at least a few of the main resources that are listed on OilSludge.com -- i.e. the "Sludged" section of the Center for Auto Safety & the 2007 NYT article ... Thoughts? Carcomplaints (talk) 20:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protesting the deletion of oil sludge-prone engines list 

message: Here are the references to the attached article for FYI purposes only as the links no longer work.
* 
* 
* 
* 
--Pilot|guy 02:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:IBM Public License

message: This article does not specify the version of the GPL license that it is incompatible with. The GPL has recently been released in version 3. Does the incompatibility still apply? Tommy 23:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the info box to say GPL (version 2) in the infobox to clarify that it only pertains to version 2. Gudeldar (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 17:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I changed it back, because the field is called "GPL compatible", not "GPL (version 2) compatible".  The difference will need to be addressed in the article text. RossPatterson (talk) 02:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compatibility with GPLv3? 

message: The FSF page at http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html says that the choice of law clause is what makes the IPL incompatible with the GPL, not the patent requirements. In the IBM Publice License v 1.0, section 2.b states that "The patent license shall not apply to any other combinations which include the Contribution." which would seem to make the patent requirements void for GPL compatibility purposes. 24.3.20.5 (talk) 20:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent licenses?
Talk:ATP7A

message: Sections added: Structure, Transport mechanism
A table also added under the Function section.
All other sections are kept but have been greatly or slightly modified (e.g. major content changes, added missing citations, deleted unverifiable contents, added verifiable contents,etc)
Daamoy (talk) 18:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brief description of changes/modifications to the article ATP7A 
Talk:Solar granule

message: Can somebody who is more knowledgeable please visit this article? Specifically, could somebody please elaborate on what happens to a Granule after dissipating? I’ve heard different explanations, so I’d be nice to get more information on that process.
:As the granule dissipates, it radiates energy in a spherical manner, as the energy below is superior, the energy is largely emitted outward. Then, consternation sets in, as the sun also has a massive magnetic field, which confuses things. During quite times, a significant amount of the energy is emitted outward. In a magnetic tangle, things get more confused. Sunspot time is... Erm, complex beyond imagination. Think that supercomputers have to try to figure it out, with human computations and learn every day/month/year.Wzrd1 (talk) 06:27, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I noticed this image that attempts to show the scale of a granule: 
 This image seems to imply that The United States is less than 1000 kilometers wide. This is wildly inaccurate, as the approx. width of The United States is ~ 4313 kilometers. Clearly, the two items given for scale on the image don't match up, so my next question was which was superimposed scale image was inaccurate, the scale bar or the image of The United States? Looking at the image information at Wikimedia commons, it states that it is a derivative work from a NASA image. Doing a google image search for "Photospheric Granulation G. Scharmer Swedish Vacuum Solar Telescope", I found this NASA image.
Looking at this, it seems the Wikipedia image is a small part of a larger image (vertically center, horizontally right of center), and judging from the scale bar on the original image, the answer to my question of 'which scale comparison is inaccurate', it seems the answer is: Both! And the image is even more inaccurate than initially suspected, as 1000 km should take up approx. the width of the entire image.
I propose replacing this image entirely. Presumably we can just replace it with the NASA image at https://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/granules.jpg using the same argument/logic surrounding the copyright laws as the image we are replacing used. Or maybe not... Perhaps the image is property of the Swedish Vacuum Solar Telescope. Anybody know? How to tell? Thoughts on replacing this? Thanks.
--DrBurningBunny (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image inaccuracy 

message: ? 2001:EE0:4081:4096:AC20:B0E2:28D4:8B41 (talk) 14:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 
Talk:Harold Gardner

message: Is this person notable enough to be in Wikipedia?Reallyso (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Hertsa Raion

message: IIRC from high-school history class, the Soviet occupation was done during the night, without any notice and it scared the hell out of the border guards, who were waken up by the Red Army. :-) bogdan 00:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Occupation in the night

message: It would be great if someone that knows Ukrainian to fix the transliterations of the village names. (the list is on Ukrainian wiki) bogdan 01:22, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Will do. --Irpen 01:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliterations 

message: In the meanwhile we shoud also decide what this article should be mainly devoted to. If this article is about the modern administrative subdivision of Ukraine, it should be titles Hertsa Raion, similarly to Chernivtsi Oblast. On the other hand, the topic of territorial controversy is also encyclopedic and the article devoted to it can exist as a separate one and under this current name, like Abrene region being currently a separate article from Pytalovo and from future Pytalovo Raion
However, this article is more like about the territory and its history rather than about Romanian parties who want to denouce the border treaties and renounce the membership in NATO, EU, withdraw the signature from Helsinki treaty and make other similarly wise steps since these institutions don't allow its members to have territorial disputes yet unsettled. So, I would think it is best to move the article for consistency with other territorial articles and whoever wants to write another one would be welcome to use the material from this one. --Irpen 01:50, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Topic of this article

message: The name Hertsa probably comes from Herzog, just like the name Herzegovina does. (Herceg is derived from the German title Herzog). Just in case someone has the time to investigate. —  Ark25  (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 