lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Usul al-Fiqh

message: The Ahkam section needs to be changed - those five levels are disputed amongst the sunni madhahib, I think a note should be made about this. For example, the Hanafis differentiate between Wajib and Fard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salleyye (talk • contribs) 03:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to fix it. --Striver 09:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ahkam]] 

message: Shouldn't Ijma rate just below--or, IMHO--above Ijtihad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IFaqeer (talk • contribs) 20:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No comment. Be bold. --Striver 00:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position of Ijma 

message: I just noticed this template -- it is extremely badly done. It is too long and detailed and since most of the terms are transliterated Arabic terms that would be unfamiliar to non-Muslims (and to many uneducated Muslims) it is close to useless. What the heck does the average English speaking reader make of Usul al-fiqh? An exotic Syrian delicacy involving figs? 
I removed it from the mullah article, where it was longer than the article and completely unbalanced the formatting. If you want to use this template, it needs to be drastically revised. Zora 09:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very bad template 

message: The ordering of the scholarly titles at the bototm of this box seems arbitrary.  Not sure which is the best ordering.  Probably I would recommend English alphabetical.  ZaydHammoudeh 02:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the English Wiki so yes, order by the English alphabet RooZ 01:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scholarly titles section

message: Shouldnt Wajib be higher up on the list than Halal? 83.218.150.38 (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Positioning of Ahkam 

message: I removed a line that was added on incorrectly "*love (husband and wife)" that did not seem to be a title, it only linked to english word love. --Dishcmds (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed incorrect line
Talk:B. J. Snowden/Archive 1

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:BB3B

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: from the theme song section, sentances in bold sohould be removed, rewritten
The catchy theme song of the series was performed by Scottish rock band Bis. Members Steven Clark (Sci-fi Steven), John Clark (John Disco), and Amanda MacKinnon (Manda Rin), along with their fictional drummer, appear at some point in all bar the first episode performing a song relating to the plot (which would be heard again during the closing credits). They turned up to sing in a variety of strange places during the series' run: the roof of a toy store; the back of a truck travelling along the street; the roof of the Jenkins' home; and even underwater in a large tank at the local aquarium. However, Bis played no part whatsoever in the storylines; they never interacted with the show's characters, and the characters never seemed to see and/or hear them either – which is a bit of a shame, as knowing Nana, she would probably have enjoyed bopping along to the songs. Perhaps it's just as well, as the Jenkins family's lives were complicated enough without them wondering why a rock band was constantly appearing in the neighbourhood, performing a very catchy number in the strangest of locations, and then disappearing as mysteriously as they had arrived. Original characters created by Mike Gordon Illustration.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.130.155 (talk) 17:17, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncyclopedic
Talk:Bad Boy Bill

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Baloubet du Rouet

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: Esse cavalo refugou 3 vezes na prova individual em Sydney 2000, acabando com as chances de medalha de Pessoa...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.52.46.61 (talk) 06:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refugão
Template talk:Huh

message: The point of this is...? 68.39.174.238 03:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To precisely label confusing statements and add articles with them to a specific category, where editors interested in fixing them can find them. Similar to the popular . -- Beland 18:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know, I made it that ;D! (I made that comment before the TfD suggested I attempt to save it). 68.39.174.238 17:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The point?
Talk:Breechloader

message: But not tonight! Lumbercutter 03:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone wrote breech mechanism recently, so I've change the redirect to point to that, although that article is of rather low quality despite its length (or rather because of it given its meandering nature). Someone not using his real name (talk) 23:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Eventually "Breech (firearms)" should have its own entry instead of redirecting to here

message: I was under the impression that articles must be printable, i.e., they should not contain any animations. If this is the case, the animation on this page should be turned into a series of images. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andreas Toth (talk • contribs) 01:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles can contain animations; in fact, many articles benifit from animations becuase they do a better job of explaining in images the point an article or section is trying to convey. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animation 

message: Re: "It was so called because of its .5-inch needle-like firing pin which passed through a paper cartridge" - .5 inch does not sound correct.--Tablizer (talk) 03:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspicious Data 

message: The entire article is about firearms.  Why is one subsection called "firearms", as if artillery aren't firearms?  Should it be "handguns" instead? LachlanA (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "firearms" subsection misnamed
Talk:Bandar Tun Razak

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: i hope someone can clean this page up. It's so hapazardly written with information everywhere. Wai Hong 04:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. I'll clean it up Mysiddiq 12:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup
Talk:Battle Frontier (song)

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Starved Rock State Park

message: I was wondering why the history section does not discuss the Starved Rock murders of 1960. They are of particular notoriety 
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1985-03-17/news/8501160090_1_starved-crime-rock
Nnnudibranch 05:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Late to the party but I have the same question. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a brief mention of the murders and the HBO docuseries. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:25, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starved Rock murders 

message: Hi, I'm getting ready to create a Wikipedia article for the Hotel Plaza archaeological site.  When I try to create the article Hotel Plaza Site it directs me to the Hotel Plaza section of the Starved Rock State Park article.
My material is FAR too involved to fit into the Hotel Plaza section of the Starved Rock State Park article; because I will discuss all the artifacts as well as contextual evidence of plant and animal food remains, and discussion of the archaeological cultures that were present, and it's a whole different subject matter really from the main Starved Rock article.
What I will do is to tweak the article name to "Hotel Plaza (Ls36) Site", to include the archaeological site number, so it won't redirect to the Starved Rock article.  I'll include a link on the Starved Rock article to the new article.
Hopefully that will work for everyone!  Please let me know if there's any input.B1deroo (talk) 01:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , Just write the article at the redirect page (turning it into an article instead of a redirect), and link the new article to this main article See, WP:SPLIT. -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotel Plaza
Talk:The Beauty of Grace

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:St. Croix Boom Site

message: These pictures might illustrate better.--Appraiser 18:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional pictures

message: Now showing as an External link is one National Park Service source, which might be the source for much of original writing of article.  Probably it should be used as a footnote reference supporting the particular points it supports.  
Also, I edited the article to include mention, from the NRHP text, that the original location of the site had been forgotten since the boom closed in early 1900s, then was rediscovered by 1975 National Park Service survey.  However, the NHL was declared by the National Park Service in 1966, per several sources.  Something doesn't make sense here. doncram (talk) 23:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Secondary sources aggressively misinterpreted what was "rediscovered" in 1975.  The site was never forgotten, and has been marked since at least 1929.  The NPS survey simply found two buildings long hidden by thick forest when it had been assumed that no structures remained from the log boom era.  It's unclear what condition these buildings were in—whether they were actually still standing or just foundation remnants—and no indication of their status now 40 years later. -McGhiever (talk) 02:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources, and confusion on dates of rediscovery
Talk:Smithsonian Institution Building

message: This building is one of many famous DC landmarks featured in the game Command & Conquer: Red Alert 2. I was wondering if anyone would have any objections to adding a mention of this? WookMuff 00:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Alert 2

message: There is nothing remotely Norman about this style, unless one considers any round and vaguely mediaeval-looking arches to be Norman. I think this phrase should be removed. The description of the architecture is good without it.----APW 14:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Faux Norman style"?

message: I can't tell if citation [1] is accurate or not. The webpage is not currently loading, neither is anything under the subdomains "cr.nps.gov" or "tps.cr.nps.gov."
Using archive.org shows that this page went to "Paca, William, House," in Maryland. The citation states accessed in 2009, and the oldest snapshot is 2010. Either way, should be updated. - Silvanathecat (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Citation
Talk:Istočno Sarajevo

message: The current article contains:
”East Sarajevo lies in the south-western part of the Sarajevo valley, in the middle of the Dinaric Alps.”
When comparing this with the indication in the article on Sarajevo - which is (approximately) to the west of Istočno Sarajevo - that Sarajevo is in the Sarajevo Valley, and with a public map, I cannot help but wonder whether the indication “in the south-western part” is incorrect. But unfortunately I have not yet been able to find a clear map of what is called the Sarajevo Valley. Who can help clarify?Redav (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Istočno Sarajevo in south-western part of valley?
Talk:I, Lucifer (Duncan novel)

message: I was wondering, and I don't know how much trouble this would be to add, but could we get some info added for the drink he mentions in the book called 'Lucifer Rising'?  I'm interested in actually trying to concoct this mixture (sans the cocaine) and have had trouble finding anything on the actual ratios liquor involved.  I'm sure experimentation on my part will be required in the end, but if anyone knows anything off hand about it, the addition would be much appreciated.
Does anyone else agree that the opening paragraph in this article isn't a 100% accurate synopsis of the deal?  Lucifer is, in fact, the one who arranges the "trial month" so he can "test" things out, rather than he himself being tested.
Also, "...while Lucifer begins to become more human-like" is just a clumsy sentence. Andrew Langcake 11:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I edited details of the film. Daniel Craig (nearly called him Declan Gunn. oopsie) and Ewan McGregor are not on the imdb.com website anymore. No mention of David Logan on the imdb.com website for this either. They have no details on who will be in it. It does state's it's "in production"
Phil Nolte (talk) 21:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Film

message: Does anyone have confirmation that the Destroy the runner album title is from this book?
Phil Nolte (talk) 21:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am a bit confused. There is a soundtrack to the novel? When you buy the book, you get a cd with it? Meishern (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  No you don't. The thing is that Stephen Coates of The Real Tuesday Weld and Glen Duncan lived together when Glen Duncan was writing the book so for it, Stephen Coates wrote a companion album but they are separate products. kind of like a film soundtrack album. With my copy of the album "I, Lucifer", there was an inlay card which had an abstract from the novel but this was just a sampler of it. Phil Nolte (talk) 20:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Music
Talk:Oh! Gravity. (song)

message: To the annon who keeps adding this chart to the article.  It's not that I don't believe that this is true it's just that it doesn't matter.  It's rare that any chart besides any of the billboard charts deserves a spot in an article like this, especially this one which doesn't even have a wikipedeia article or any visable online presence. --T-rex 03:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[CMC]] weekend 22

message: Could someone change the title of this article to reflect the actual song title? I don't feel comfortable with the move process, yet, and I'm afraid to screw something up. chowski 18:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try, but I think Oh! Gravity. (song) might already be a redirect which would mean that we would need an admin to help out --T-rex 19:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Good news, looks as if it worked --T-rex 19:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! chowski 19:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move: Oh! Gravity (song) --> Oh! Gravity. (song)
Talk:Oak Alley Plantation

message: 1,200 in 1860 and by 1964 only 175 remaining ... 
(Civil war disrupting the ongiong operations of over 1,000 of them).
And 300,000 slaves in Louisiana at beginning of Civil War in 1860 and that down to zero
by end of the war. bone si chancie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.192.7.35 (talk) 11:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Louisiana important historical data re plantations
Talk:Sherwood Forest Plantation

message: In 1842 President John Tyler bought "Walnut Grove" from Collier Minge, his cousin and a local planter, and renamed the plantation "Sherwood Forest," as he likened himself to the story of Robin Hood regarding the Whig party.  According to the official website, sherwoodforest.org, there is no mention of Harrison's ownership of the plantation.  Also factually noted, Harrison died the year before Tyler, who was his Vice President for only one month, purchased the plantation.
Is this notable? If so, does it really deserve its own section? What does the editor mean by "factually noted"? momoricks 04:00, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy 
Talk:Bedhead (film)

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: as indicated in the article: http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Makeup/4303/bedhead.html/ .  i have no idea what to do kthx.  daveh4h 06:26, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: this is taken from a fan page
Talk:Pleasantville, Houston

message: Current 2020 images of Pleasantville places
https://www.flickr.com/photos/2cheap2keep/50135970347/in/album-72157714386808007/   2C2KPhotos (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community Center Image 

message: The documentary, God Save Texas (2024), based off a book of the same name, discusses the history of Pleasantville (in episode 2, "The Price of Oil"). And it was founded by more than one person. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 08:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pleasantville
Talk:Royal Oaks Country Club

message: The Betty L. Martin article from the Chronicle stated that the Property Tax Votes Alief Area, an anti-tax group against the Alief ISD proposed tax increase, had the website http://www.alieftaxvote.com but the Wayback machine never archived it: http://wayback.archive.org/*/http://www.alieftaxvote.com is empty.
WhisperToMe (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alief Tax Vote (anti-tax group from Royal Oaks) website 

message: Found: https://royaloakscctx.memberstatements.com/Clubs/RoyalOaksCCHouston/Uploaded/FacilityPics/ROCCMap09.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 19:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old brochure
Talk:Behind the Music that Sucks

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Ben Brown (blogger)

message: why did you get rid of the apple switch part.  he humps a computer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.243.126.71 (talk) 19:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 04:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links