Template talk:Screw drives

message: although there is a gray area, some fasteners are clearly common (slotted, phillips, etc) and some are not common in everyday life (polydrive, external torx...).  It would be good to have somewhere in a table all (not-100%-obsolete) fasteners, but perhaps this information would be best conveyed if there were two tables, one for the most common subset & the other with 'all'.  It seems clear to me that this would be a good balance between providing all the information while remaining relevant to the 'average' person...
Mboard182 (talk) 05:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  two versions ?? 

message: PolyDrive is a 6-toothed fastener similar to torx and spine.  It should be added --Mboard182
I thought so too. Done. --Farry (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PolyDrive 

message: I can't find any sources defining this type, but it is referenced a lot in tool catalogs and repair manuals.  I don't know how it is different than polydrive.  It probably should be added.
I added a page for spline drive  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mboard182 (talk • contribs) 05:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spline drive 

message: This box says that a "slotted" screwdriver is "erroneously" called a flathead, but no other wikipedia page gives any reason why this would be erroneous. No other page explains it either. Can someone explain this, and put some kind of information about why it would be erroneous somewhere so that people can understand?PotatoKnight (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at the revision history; the issue is that "flathead" in fact (according to the people who were editing the template) refers to screws which do not have rounded heads (so are flat-headed). They repeatedly attempted to add essay-length passages on why referring to the drive as "flathead" is "wrong" in the middle of a navigational template. I chose the current wording as a compromise between length and accuracy. Stannered (talk) 18:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it work to change it to simply "commonly, flathead"? I seriously spent about ten minutes looking at the various screw-related wiki pages trying to figure out why that would be erroneous. While I certainly agree that a screed on why it's wrong doesn't belong in a template box, there should be some evidence/information somewhere for an assertion like that.  It seems like it would just be easier to point out that there is one name and another common name and leave it at that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PotatoKnight (talk • contribs) 21:10, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That was my view also, but when I left it at that, users (or one user) kept returning to re-add the diatribe. The current wording is very much a compromise. I'm not at all sure what can be done *shrugs* Stannered (talk) 21:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to give it a shot and ask that the anonymous contributer(s) to provide a verifiable citation that this is erroneous and also put some information in one of the pages. I'm not looking to start a truly dumb edit war over this, but it really seems like this is putting one persons opinion onto every page related to screws.PotatoKnight (talk) 02:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been changing this by adding "misidentified". I suppose if it is not found in the Wikipedia it's not true. If you do a simple image search on google (see: screwdriver types)you will find a preponderance of evidence that "Flathead" is a lay term at best for "slotted". No trade reference refers to this as "flathead". As a tradesman, I cannot tell you how often I request the following: "a 6-32 flathead phillips screw" I use a lot of them. Perpetuating this issue only makes me question other entries which I have no expertise in. Irritantno9 (talk) 21:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that as long as this is a point of contention, the "Flathead" reference should be romoved. I'm new to this. I am only now understnading how contentious this issue is. I don't see any citation that upholds this as a "commonly" referenced naming of this drive type. Please cite credible source rather than your opinion on this matter. Irritantno9 (talk) 21:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

text:  I'm actually OK with leaving out the term "flathead" entirely. However, a google image search for "flathead screw" does indeed turn up pictures of screws that are slotted but not flathead in the sense that you are using the word (see for example http://www.uniquetextures.com/01360.htm). A search for "flathead screwdriver" turns up dozens of links that use that term to refer to a screwdriver intended for this kind of screw. I think it's fair to say that people use the term "flathead" to refer to slotted. That doesn't mean that it has to say that in the template, however.PotatoKnight (talk) 00:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just because a crocodile looks like an alligator, that does not make it OK to misidentify one for a scholarly record. If you think a crocodile and an alligator are functionally equivalent, fine. Just don't write it on wikipedia. . I would suggest reviewing references such as the Engineer's Handbook or Machinery's Handbook instead of www.uniquetextures.com. Use of "head" in the descriptive name expressly refers to the Head type (see: Head type : Cheese, oval, pan, flat, round, fillister, etc). Irritantno9 (talk) 23:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous? 

message: I have tidied the last few screw head types listed under "other" to conform to the same formatting as the rest of the list. Diagrams (preferably svg) are needed for these in the same style as the rest of the list, I have included only placeholder images in this edit, as i dont have the ability to do this (artistic or otherwise ;) ) StealthFox (talk) 12:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screw head diagrams 

message: I believe the characterization of the clutch head bit as "one way" is erroneous.  One way screws are actually designed to be installed by slot drivers.  Clutch bits are an entirely different sort of beast as can be seen here, and here.  I believe this misnomer comes from similarity in the shape of the clutch bit and the seeming shape of the indentations in the one-way screws.  However, as you'll note here and here, it says that the screws require a slotted bit for insertion.  Further, they require a special tool for removal.  At no point in this process is a clutch bit used.  I believe the "(one way)" should be removed from the clutch bit description and a separate category created for one-way screws.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Walkeraj (talk • contribs) 18:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: at some point in the past. User:GKFXtalk 23:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clutch head bit is not one way 

message: I believe the Mortorq® spiral drive system (MT) from Phillips Screw Company should be included. The drive is being increasingly used instead of Torq-Set and Tri-Wing for high torque / low weight screws in the aerospace industry. A second version of the Mortorq (MTS) drive, adapted to the higher torque needs of the automobile industry also seems to be growing in popularity. GB richard (talk) 12:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: at some point in the past. User:GKFXtalk 23:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mortorq 

message: there's another type of tri-wing that should be added.  The one pictured is the "triple v" or the tri-wing that is off-set with a triangle in the middle.  There is another type, commonly used that is similar but doesn't have the center triangle, and so the arms of it are not off-set like in the one pictured, but rather come together in a central point. Centerone (talk) 04:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: at some point in the past. User:GKFXtalk 23:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  triwing 

message: Triangular mentioned here: http://www.sizes.com/tools/screw_drive.htm is not on the list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Varnav (talk • contribs) 13:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please add this type of screw head to the article.  See Screw_types for the missing types in this chart. 64.128.27.82 (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you referring to Tri-wing?  78.26 (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Already in template.  Or do you mean "TA"? 78.26 (talk) 19:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triangular 

message: I don't know the proper name but I have come across star shaped screw on various Sony products. Unlike a torques screw this one has a five pointed star. This should be included if anyone has any more information about it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.229.180.225 (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pentagon 

message: These exist, too, and are fairly common.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.18.61.83 (talk) 17:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Thanks for the good suggestion. I added it. (Graphic artists will notice that I made the icon in raster, not vector. This is only because I am too impatient right now to study how to use a vector-graphics editor like Inkscape. That's something I'll look forward to doing sometime when I have lots of time and patience available.) — ¾-10 22:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Security Hex (Allen) 

message: tried to add this to the box, but it didn't show up.  maybe editing in these boxes requires approval or something.  anyway, i noted on the edit why i did it.Colbey84 (talk) 02:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: nevermind.  it showed up later (yes, i did a refresh on the page earlier).Colbey84 (talk) 07:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  TA 

message: Could JIS be added?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.255.172.138 (talk) 08:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: at some point in the past. User:GKFXtalk 23:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  JIS 

message: Most of links  are misleading. For example "Bristol" should link to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clutch_head_screw#Bristol
Instead it links to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_wrench
and then is redirected to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_screw_drives 85.193.199.225 (talk) 02:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad links.