lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Acute-phase protein

message: "inflamatory cells"  on the page are neutrophils, and are the most common white blood cell in the blood in normal patients even when not experiencing a disease state.  I feel thus that it is incorrect to call them such.HolyMongoose 16:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A further clinical significance is pharmacological: the acute phase reaction response can enhance the binding of drugs: '[...] conditions resulting in the acute phase reaction response (cancer, arthritis, myocardial infarction, Crohn's disease) lead to elevated levels of α1-acid glycoprotein and enhanced binding of basic drugs.' — Wilkinson, G. R., 2001, ‘Pharmacokinetics: the Dynamics of Drug Absorption, Distribution, and Elimination’ in Hardman, J. G., and Limbird, L. E. (eds), 2001, Goldman and Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 10th Edition, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 3–30.
—Zoe Ocean 05:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmacological significance 

message: I don't know whether interleukin 22 merits a mention here or not.  I came across one mention in passing, in a largely unrelated article: "Interleukin 22 is a cytokine involved in the acute-phase inflammatory response."  --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 10:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interleukin 22? 

message: Is mannose-binding lectin really an acute-phase protein? I mean is there data that its concentration in blood increases during infection? --Kuimov (talk) 09:19, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that hosts vary in their expression (), but current reviews indicate that it is an acute-phase reactant when the genetic program is intact (full-text of these in PMC):  and  -- Scray (talk) 17:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks. --Kuimov (talk) 15:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mannose-binding protein? 

message: IL6 page refers to this Wiki page. Should it be listed as well?
CitizenofEarth001 (talk) 09:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  IL-6
Talk:Camp Fortune

message: I find it hard to believe that the top elevation of Camp Fortune is 200 m. Ottawa is listed at an elevation of 70 m and Fortune has a vertical of 180 m.  Is it really 50 m DOWN from Ottawa to the base of Fortune?  The reference (http://www.skiengine.com/resorts/canada/quebec/577/camp-fortune.html) is out of date. Sxg169 (talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altitude/Top Elevation
Talk:Ryan Tower

message: Someone added Sun TV's (CKXT) analog and digital signals with a "coming soon" designation. Since Sun's now broadcasting digitally on 20, I've removed the "coming soon" label. I also removed the analog entry completely... although they have a license from the CRTC, they have no plans currently to broadcast analog in Ottawa. 199.246.40.54 (talk) 19:27, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sun TV 

message: Are there any reputable sources that refer to the tall TV-FM tower at Camp Fortune as the "Ryan Tower". Bell Media, owner of a recently dismantled shorter tower at the same site, referred to that shorter tower as the "Ryan Tower", as it was the remnant of the tower originally moved to the Camp fortune site in 1961 to be used for CFRA-FM, the predecessor to CFMO-FM and now CKKL-FM.
Wgm777 (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Tower Name
Talk:University of Texas

message: To most people University of Texas refers to the UT system, this article should move to University of Texas System. RockiRock 16:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is definitely not true.  Most people use "University of Texas" to refer to The University of Texas at Austin. Johntex\talk 05:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect this article to [[University of Texas System]]
Talk:Rideau River

message: The City of Ottawa no longer uses explosives to help speed up the spring clearing. Grandma Roses (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction about blasting 

message: 'Rideau' means just 'curtain', not 'curtain of water.' The name is attributed to Samuel de Champlain.  http://www.rideau-info.com/canal/history/rideau-route/hogsback.html  Grandma Roses (talk) 20:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  French name of the river
Talk:Battle of FSB Mary Ann

message: This page claims that the Battle of FSB Mary Ann was the largest battle over a fire support base during the Vietnam War, this is just wrong as the internal link will show, the Battle of Fire Support Base Ripcord, was much larger, 250 American dead to 33 at Mary Ann. I am going to remove it tommorow if there are no objections.Colin 8 03:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article still contains this claim. What is the basis for it? Bastie (talk) 22:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Ripcord was a multi-day event, while Mary Ann was a single engagement. I'll have to check, but I'm fairly sure that there were some FSB engagements in III CTZ that resulted in more US KIA in the same period of time (say one night or one assault).Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:17, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm doing a major overhaul of this article. Already found at least one action (FSB Jaeger in III CTZ in 1968) that had the same number of casualties, and that was a small action compared to some. Intothatdarkness (talk) 16:45, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

message: This one is difficult, because Keith Nolan's book is the only single-volume examination of FSB Mary Ann. I plan to add some other stuff to amplify his work, though. Intothatdarkness (talk) 21:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In a related note, does anyone know of a free-use image of Mary Ann? The linked page has one, but I'd like to have one for the main article. Intothatdarkness (talk) 20:54, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Dublin Intermediate Football Championship

message: The WP:COMMONNAME of this competition is Dublin Intermediate Football Championship. The term "GAA" is superfluous (no-one else organises a Dublin Intermediate Football Championship) and the article should be moved back from this misnamed page, to which it was moved without discussion by an editor who has similarly displaced many GAA articles. See discussion at Talk:London GAA Intermediate Football Championship. Brocach (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pointless page move
Talk:Ministry of Supply

message: No merge.
* The Minister of Supply article is, and should be, essentially a history of the post holders, date in and date out, and possibly any scandals associated with that particular minister.
* The Ministry of Supply article is, and should be, about what the department did, acheived, or failed to do. It also enables predecessor departments to be [linked] and discussed; as well as successor departments.
* I personnally have little interest in Ministers, but I am interested in the department. I note there was a proposal to merge other ministers/departments, such as Ministry of Munitions of War. My comments would be identical, in this case. Pyrotec 16:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

message: In WWII/The Royal Ordnance Factories, it's written «these were mostly designed and built by private armaments companies». Sounds wrong to me, the s at armament. But I'm no native speaker, so I'd like a more qualified person to make the decision. That's all! Cheers, Thouny (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are right about the grammar, but it's a total mouthful of a sentence either way! I'm going to change it to, "arms companies", which is a very commonly used contraction in English (73m google hits for "arms companies" vs 21,000 for "armament companies" vs 14,500 for "armaments companies"). Thanks Thom2002 (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential typo

message: I'm looking at a Rolls-Royce drawing that contains a Ministry of Supply stamp dated 10 October 1960.
109.68.192.224 (talk) 09:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ministry of Supply still active post 1959
Talk:The Secret River

message: The same information is repeated twice at least in three cases.Marcin862 (talk) 08:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Plot summary needs reworking 
Talk:Yorkshire Day

message: I can't find a source to confirm the slavery thing independently: it does occur in early press, though.  Could it have been an early mistake?  Curious.  Morwen - Talk 16:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about Wikipedia? Abolitionism#Slavery_Abolition_Act_1833 Lozleader 18:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in The Times of 1834, too. Lozleader 18:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha! Morwen - Talk 19:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do people from Yorkshire still have a patriotic feel about England, this is giving nightmares, England isn't going to break up is it?Davido488 (talk) 01:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pacific Art Collective

message: Pacific Art Collective boasts 7.5 million entries on Google search engine.  The Collective boast over 500 artists, and 10,000 members.  Remember this is an online collective that is growing 30% month over month.  This collective is making an impact, because there is no competition in Silicon Valley.  Clbarrientos 16:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Number9dream

message: In the "Guardian" review, it states:
"One character and one secret facility from Ghostwritten wink tangentially into life here too."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2001/mar/10/fiction.davidmitchell
I did notice the ghostwritten reference - could someone insert them into the main article?
-Sam Newhouse, snewhouse9@gmail.com, 17:14 September 23 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.95.14.210 (talk) 21:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to Ghostwritten 

message: This section reads like nothing more than POV fanboy-ism, with such lines as, "The escapism that Eiji uses throughout the novel in his fantasies and alternate realities lead us to empathize with his character..."  "Us"?  This isn't Amazon, a place where anyone can set themselves up as a literary critic, it is supposed to be encyclopaedic.  Number9Dream is one of my favourite novels of recent years, but the Analysis section is anything but analytical. Guv2006 (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis?
Talk:Louis, Prince Napoléon

message: I think this page should really be placed at Prince Louis Napoléon, like it was before, as this is how he was commonly known. However, I cannot move it to this because of the current redirect. --Berks105 16:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Lapaz 17:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below.  I hope someone with more knowledge than I will go through these links and fix them.  I don't want to get them wrong, or I'd do it myself.  Then it will be straightforward to redirect Louis Napoléon Bonaparte to Napoleon III of France. -GTBacchus(talk) 10:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
:Support although I'd actually prefer Louis Bonaparte, Prince Napoléon, but when I moved it the first time, I didn't put it there, because it would probably be controversial. Morhange 17:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support This is an improvement, but I think it should be at Louis, Prince Napoléon. Lethiere 18:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Can somebody the difference between the titles Prince Napoléon and Prince Imperial, and the issue around it? Demophon (talk) 12:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Napoléon vs. Prince Imperial 
Talk:Corey Sanders

message: There is an error in the box showing statistics. Corey Sanders was known as "T-Rex" because of his size and weight, with is incorrectly put at 175 lbs. It should be 275 lbs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.69.100.66 (talk) 22:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed --Racklever (talk) 12:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Error
Talk:Freedom Park (Arlington, Virginia)

message: I removed the reflection posted in this discussion area about Freedom Park because the discussion area on Wiki articles is intended for discussions in relation to the article's make up and content.  For example, you can post here and ask why there is no picture of the cobblestones from Warsaw or question the presence of the images of the Berlin Wall. The discussion area is not for personal opinions, beliefs, or ideas on the subject of the article.  Hope this helps make clearer the editing choices here.~ (The Rebel At) ~ 14:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reflections on Freedom Park
Talk:Reading in the Dark

message: I replaced Derry with Londonderry, as that is the official name for this city.
The city's official name is Londonderry according to the city's Royal Charter and as a result of a recent High Court decision[2] (Jan 2007) remains so. 
The Zeroorez 16:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the change, as the novel is actually set in Derry as is Deane's (the author's) choice. Gaillimh 23:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Derry vs. Londonderry
Talk:The Moor's Last Sigh

message: At this moment the citation is needed for the words „[this novel] raises issues of individuality and the possibility of hybridity in a world moving toward singularity“. Maybe someone find the following information helpful: the book itself contains following words (as told by narrator Moraes): the tragedy of multiplicity destroyed by singularity, the defeat of Many by One (Part IV, p. 408 in 1994 Vintage paperback edition). Although nowhere it is said that these words are the most important in the book, I think it is possible to interpret them that way.--Vytaut (talk) 05:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerning issues raised in the book 
Talk:Life & Times of Michael K

message: The "Preceded by/Followed by" feature in the infobox is meant to be used for books in a series, not simply name the writer's other books. AshcroftIleum 06:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: How was the book received in South Africa when first published? – Kaihsu 12:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The sex scene on the beach led to the book narrowly escaping being banned. Again, I need to find the reference. Totorotroll (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Critiques

message: I've just added the date in which the novel takes place. Noël says that he learned how to play cricket in the 30s. He's sixty during the novel. Based on that, it's safe to assume that the novel takes place during the late 70s, early 80s. Evenfiel (talk) 17:36, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The comment about "allowing minorities to determine their destinies" is revealing, according to Derek Attwell. I'll find the reference and add it. Totorotroll (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date in which the novel takes place 

message: I think the present section on race was written by someone with little understanding of the Cape in the 1980s and, until somebody writes a better informed piece, should not be relied on. --Clifford Mill (talk) 09:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Race
Talk:Earthly Powers

message: Shouldn't race be added to the list of themes. Kenneth's relationship with Ralph(?) his african-american lover and the whole Africa stay chapters are clear references to race relations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sxjthefirst (talk • contribs) 16:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Themes - Race 

message: While the Plot Summary section certainly exemplifies the virtue of brevity (and I am loath to change this), it leaves out the most important source of the conflict that drives the novel. Would we consider amending the section to read: On his eighty-first birthday, retired gay writer Kenneth Toomey is asked by the Archbishop of Malta to assist in the process of canonisation of Carlo Campanati, who is the late Pope Gregory XVII and Kenneth's brother-in-law. Toomey subsequently works on his memoirs, which span the major part of the 20th century, and which reveal that Toomey, a lifelong faithful Catholic, feels ostracized by his Church. rowley (talk) 04:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 
Talk:To the Ends of the Earth

message: In the article, in the first book it says that Talbot's benefactor, and the intended recipient of his journal, is his "grandfather." But, in the second book he intends to send the journal to his "uncle." In the TV movie he says his "godfather." Is this all correct? 207.69.137.34 03:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The TV movie was an adaptation, so had some differences from the novels.Parkwells (talk) 23:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grandfather, Uncle, or Godfather? Error or Correct? 

message: …as described in the edit summary, and is clear from a glance at a diff for today's edits. Please remove tags once the issue to which attention has been called (lack of sourcing, sections covering only one of the three books, etc.) are resolved. Cheers, Le Prof  50.129.227.141 (talk) 07:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Revised the lede, restructured, added expansion and other appropriate tags

message: There is a page for the miniseries that doesn't have the information about it as presented here. Shouldn't that information be moved to that page?Airproofing (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miniseries info and its own page
Talk:Staying On

message: Is there any reason to have capitalised the word "tonga" - it's not the Pacific island state we are talking about here, just a sort of carriage. I'll change it back in a while if there isn't. TobyJ 15:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why capitalise "Tonga"? 

message: I do not have my copy of Staying On at hand, so I cannot check, but the impression I received was that Lucy Smalley was not able to afford to return to England, and that her final acceptance of Indian society indicated that she would, indeed, "stay on". I will wait until I can reread the novel before I edit the page. 70.177.94.136 (talk) 10:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucy's fate? 

message: "We learn about life as an expat in Pankot principally by listening to Lucy's ponderings, for it is she who is the loquacious one, in contrast to Tusker's pathological reticence."
This reads like a sophomore writing to impress a teacher. 206.40.38.252 (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good grief
Talk:Alan Magee

message: I honestly think this article should be considered for deletion (or should at LEAST contain a warning of some sort) since it most likely violates Wikipedia's policies. There are no credible references cited whatsoever, yet this story/potential myth, is written as if it is a historical fact.
--jp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.179.196 (talk) 03:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the Mythbusters story added the detail of a French Resistence" bombing of the rail station, something not mentioned, or in evidence, in the historical record.  As the story has been corrupted (via the word-of-mouth "Telephone Game") over the years, I speculate the explosion was added, perhaps to help explain the highly unlikely survival of the airman. Check-Six 21:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is confirmed that one can survive a fall without a parachute. In fact there is at least one more WWII such story, the tail gunner of a russian Il-2 Sturmovik ground attack plane fell 1500ft onto the ice of river Danube during the 1944-1945 siege of Budapest and survived, even though his parachute was shredded apart when german cannons destroyed his plane. He survived because the plane wreck crashed before he did and its bomb load exploded upon impact, air-cushioning his landing. It is also confirmed fact that one stewardess from the DC-10 that exploded above Czech-Slovakia sometime in the 1970s survived 33,000ft of freefall without parachutes, she got entangled in a tall tree's branches and had to be "rebuilt" by doctors essentially, but eventually she recovered. Conclusion: the mustached duo messed up again 91.83.19.241 (talk) 23:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credible References
Talk:Bordurian

message: Where is the word "da" found, and in which context? 惑乱 分からん 17:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

message: :Sorry, I found it... 惑乱 分からん 19:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At that time, the leader of the Dutch Nazis was called Mussert (who called himself "Leider", the missing "L" in the name). I do not know for sure - but could the name not also hint at him? Mussert was known in Belgium, he started in politics by successfully campaigning against Belgian-Dutch treaties on canals and water (do not know whether the Iron Rhine was involved too).
The Iron Guard of course, was a Romanian invention, but none of the names in the article there or at Principality_of_Pindus sound familiar (no "spons"). Funny how that Moldovanet page manages to turn Borduria into the Soviet Union, actually. --Pan Gerwazy 04:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mussert sounds possible, although a MUSSolini-hitLER portmanteau is more probable. Most of the names and words otherwise sound like spoofs of the Flemish Marols dialect. 惑乱 分からん 19:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Müsstler
Talk:An Artist of the Floating World

message: It seems to me that the content of this article is mostly taken from the book review linked at the bottom - a review which is simultaneously extremely pretentious and grossly uninformed. The author of the article gets many details about the novel wrong - a very cursory reading reveals that even basic plot points are presented backwards or just plain wrong. For example, the review suggests that the protagonist first worked for Master Takeda and then Moriyama, when in fact the opposite was true. Additionally, the review suggests that two of the protagonist's most famous works were "Complacency" and "Eyes on the Horizon". If the reviewer had actually taken the time to read the book carefully (or perhaps at all), he would know that "Complacency" was essentially an early draft of "Eyes on the Horizon", and it was seen by no more than three people. These concerns may seem trivial, but ultimately they are emblematic of a disregard for the novel as well as a blatant attempt to use Wikipedia as a personal advertisement. At the very least, this article should be removed from the page (and I plan to do so). Moreover, I would recommend a total rewrite of the article based on actual in-text sources and published reviews. Sorry if this is out of line - I am new to editing, but thought that this page does a disservice to the novel.
-- Newbie  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.76.8.210 (talk) 20:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article draws too heavily from the suspiciously linked book review 

message: A draft article, Draft: An Artist of the Floating World, was just submitted to Articles for Creation.  It had to be declined because we already have an article (this article) on the novel.  However, editors are encouraged to review the draft and compare it to the article to make any improvements to the article.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:An Artist of the Floating World]]