Talk:Effects of Hurricane Isabel in New Jersey

message: I know you are reworking it, but I am thinking - such detailed impact articles has only happened with Katrina, which is our flagship article! Is the main article getting too long, is that why this was created? Even Katrina doesn't have subarticles for areas far distant from the core! that would need to be made just for Isabel if this becomes a trend...still it is a very good article. B-class. CrazyC83 04:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is exactly what I plan to do. As stated in the Isabel article, I plan to have subarticles for North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, and Pennsylvania. Hurricanehink (talk) 04:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking, since NJ was >200 miles from the center, subarticles would be needed in Florida (while no land impact, there was at least one fatality on the water and beach erosion), South Carolina (outer bands left side), District of Columbia, West Virginia (core of the storm), New York (still in the core), New England (although that was kinda far, there might have been impact there), other states farther west? and in Canada (at the end until dissipation on the 20th)...that is 13-14 articles! CrazyC83 05:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think all of those are needed. Florida and South Carolina were minimal, and can easily fit in the main article. D.C. could possibly, though since it is such a small area it might be a bit difficult. West Virginia is possible, though since it is inland there might not be a lot of info. I was looking into doing one for New York, but the effects were fairly minor and there's not too much info. The same goes for New England, though since it is a fairly large area it could be included with NY and could possibly work. I tried finding info for Canada, but I can't find that much, so right now I'm leaning towards no for there. True, NJ is 200 miles from the center, though it was still the fringes of Isabel. Currently, I'm only planning to do the 6 (NC, VA, MD, DE, PA, and NJ), though anyone else can do any of those, or DC or NE if they want to. Perhaps this discussion should be on the Isabel talk page, though. Hurricanehink (talk) 05:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hurricane Isabel]] getting too long?

message: This article is pretty good. Anyone object to me putting it for FAC? Juliancolton (talk) 22:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. We are not supposed to flood FAC with articles from this project. --Coredesat 22:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

text: So?--Nilfanion (talk) 23:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FAC

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 19:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Effects of Hurricane Isabel in New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519222604/http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~512161 to http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~512161
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Effects of Hurricane Isabel in New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927002442/http://www.poynter.org/dg.lts/id.48347/content.content_view.htm to http://www.poynter.org/dg.lts/id.48347/content.content_view.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091021154429/http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/press_release_0247.shtm to https://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/press_release_0247.shtm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120212211155/http://www.nj.gov/dep/shoreprotection/StormSurvey09-19-03.pdf to http://www.nj.gov/dep/shoreprotection/StormSurvey09-19-03.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 15:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress