Talk:Augustine Volcano

message: Ash plume heights should use units of feet because aircraft flight levels use units of feet. It will be easier to compare ash plume heights with aviation flight levels if they use the same units. Since the metric terms are probably of use to geologists, they should be left in as conversions, following the British units, according to the second rule in Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) that says use the source units first and the converted values second. RPellessier | Talk 11:04, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ash plume heights should be measured in units of feet 

message: I'm no geologist, but the wording of the first sentence seems a bit off. "Augustine Volcano is a Lava Dome Complex on Augustine Island " The volcano is the island, there isn't anything more to it. Not sure how else to word it or if there is some scientific reason that it should be worded the way it is now. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:10, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  wording of lead 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Augustine Volcano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111105180818/http://www.cnn.com/2005/TEC/science/12/15/augustine.volcano.ap/index.html to http://www.cnn.com/2005/TEC/science/12/15/augustine.volcano.ap/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Augustine Volcano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060923160605/http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y to http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-show_geoid=Y&-tree_id=4001&-_caller=geoselect&-context=dt&-errMsg=&-all_geo_types=N&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_P001&-redoLog=false&-transpose=N&-search_map_config=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: An older revision  of this page included a reference to CNN about a forecast of the 2006 eruption. The page no longer exists on the CNN website and Wayback Machine does not have an intact copy of the page (it only has "page not found" versions). I therefore removed the following in my latest edit to the page:
:In mid-December 2005 a sulfur dioxide-laden plume of steam, hundreds of small earthquakes and a new coating of ash over its currently snow-clad peak, taken together, suggested that Augustine was building to a new eruption, likely in 2006.
I replaced it with citations from a USGS paper. RedWolf (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  CNN source removed for 2006 eruption forecast