lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tommy Taylor (New Zealand politician)

message: I propose to change the page title to Thomas Edward Taylor (New Zealand politician). I presume that the page is not already called 'Thomas Edward Taylor' or 'Tommy Taylor' is because those pages already exist. I further presume that the original creator of this page was not aware of disambiguation by adding content in brackets and chose to use the person's initials. As he's not known in sources under those initials, the proposed move would appear justified. Schwede66 (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal 

message: If somebody wants to add to the article, Addington Cemetery tour has a lot of detail about Taylor. And Linwood Cemetery tour outlines the Isitt / Taylor relationship in more detail. Schwede66 01:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional source
Talk:Electric multiple unit (Queensland Rail)

message: As per the latest edit, I added info from an official ASEA source that this guy photographed, which I'm unsure of how to cite. Please help me by changing it up a bit. Edgar Searle (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just gave it a tweak now. Good work finding it! XAM2175 (T) 11:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure of how to cite this information
Talk:Muph & Plutonic

message: I believe M+P are notable under the following criteria of WP:MUSIC:
* "[The group] has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable." - I've linked two articles from major Australian newspapers dealing solely with M+P, and am trying to find more.
* "[The group h]as released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." - M+P have released two albums on Obese, which is almost certainly the best-known hiphop label in Australia and has on its roster Pegz and Hilltop Hoods, both of which are notable.
--Nasica (talk) 06:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability rationale 

message: There have been many articles referring to Plutonic Lab's production work on others' albums, which have linked to the Muph & Plutonic article even though they have nothing to to with Muph.  I have created a new article for Plutonic Lab (which currently redirects to Muph & Plutonic) and replaced the relevant links.  I propose that the section on Plutonic Lab be expanded into a separate article there, which can go into more detail about his work on production, as well as his latest venture with G.Love, "Moonshine Lemonade".
Any objections? —sroc (talk) 10:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plutonic Lab 
Talk:List of Ginban Kaleidoscope episodes

message: This episode list is very short and does not provide much detail.  I believe it doesn't really deserve its own article, and should be merged into the main page, similar to Kamichu!.  What do people think? Will make the article a bit longer, but is pretty short anyway.  Would look nicer, too. -- Highwind888, the Fuko Master (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into main article?
Talk:Adam Thorpe

message: If he is a poet, what poetry works has he published? Racepacket (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Content added per his page in the Polish Wikipedia. -- Deborahjay (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Published poetry
Talk:Stan Goosman

message: Sir William Stanley Goosman was popularly known as Stan, not William. Our article's first reference is to Barry Gustafson's book The First 50 Years: A History of the New Zealand National Party (1986), throughout which Goosman is called Stan. On page 70, for example: "An exception in Cabinet was clearly Stan Goosman, a very wealthy man who had started his working life as an ill-educated farm labourer." In the book's index, he is listed as "Goosman, Sir W. S. (Stan)." We also cite a 2009 Waikato Times newspaper story by Roy Burke that likewise, in its only mention of Goosman, refers to him as Stan. NedFausa (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Also on page 401 (index) in Gustafson's book. Thanks for pointing this out; it shall be corrected forthwith. Schwede66 06:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is misnamed
Talk:B-class Melbourne tram

message: I have raised the option of moving much of the specification data from the infobox to a table at Talk:Z-class Melbourne tram#Proposed reorganisation of specification data. Reasoning and a mock up are available at said page, input from editors would be greatly appreciated on that page. Liamdavies (talk) 08:49, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed reorganisation of specification data 

message: Hey everybody, Melbourne B-class trams are officially known as light rail vehicles on the official Yarra Trams Website http://www.yarratrams.com.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-fleet/b-class/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cityrailsaints (talk • contribs) 10:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light Rail Vehicles 

message: I am proposing to remove the hyphen from the title of this tram article, as the official nomenclature from the Department of Transport and Planning is not to have hyphens in tram class names. Examples include on their official website , the Melbourne Tram Plan  and the PTV website . Other common unofficial sources like Vicsig also do not have a hyphen. I'm also proposing to change all the other Melbourne tram class article names in a similar manner, any feedback welcome! Takerlamar (talk) 00:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing hyphen from article name 
Talk:Charles Wilson (librarian)

message: I'm having some difficulty parsing "". I may be mistaken, but it seems ambiguous as to whether Wilson looked after his own personal library and also Turnbull's, or whether it refers to the one same library. So, to clarify, do both "substantial private library" and "substantial library" refer to the same or different libraries? -- Ohc ¡digame! 02:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private library
Talk:Mongolian horse

message: This section was getting too commercial, but has interesting info and some cool images, so parking it here for now in the event that sometime it can be reworked without being advertising:
------
The Mongolian Horse was the subject of various works by the English painter Vincent Haddelsey, who undertook a trip to Inner Mongolia in 1980, to study and paint this animal. Also for young Mongolian painters, like Adiyabazar CHADRAABAL in Ulan Bator, are horses main motives of their paintings
---------
:Those images may be "cool", but in Wikipedia and on Commons they are all copyright violations and will be deleted. The uploader is not the copyright owner of those paintings and has no authorisation to release them into the public domain. --Latebird (talk) 23:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't add them to wiki, I just removed them from the article and put them here.  If they are deleted, then we can just toss the gallery here, too.  No big deal to me, I was just trying to remove spam from the article without starting an edit war.  Montanabw(talk) 03:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was never implied that you were the uploader. The images are gone now, so it was doubly justified for you to remove them from the article. --Latebird (talk) 14:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK.  I tossed the gallery link too, then.  I guess if legal versions reappear, they can drop us a note here.  Thanks for your help and, by the way, your continued monitoring of the various Mongolian/Pzrewalski's/etc articles.  It has been noted by us at WPEQ and appreciated!   Montanabw(talk) 23:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art 

message: New study about diet and foraging behavior in competition with the Kulan and the Przewalski:  http://www.thehorse.com/articles/38491/tail-hairs-reveal-gobi-desert-equids-dietary-choices   Montanabw(talk) 17:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source material 
Talk:Morab

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060504080704/http://www.equiworld.net/Breeds/morab/history.htm and https://web.archive.org/web/20070226203740/http://www.morab.com/morab_beginnings.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:55, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hotel Continental Saigon

message: I don't know how to go into what I wrote and edit it.  It needs an end of parenthesis after "Man's Fate," and an end of quotation marks at the end of the article.  I'd appreciate it if someone more skilled than I could do that for me.  Thanks.  Joe  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swimmerjoe (talk • contribs) 15:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  My recent changes
Talk:Bến Thành Market

message: http://www.ben-thanh-market.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.103.252.160 (talk) 13:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: Hello everyone,
Thank you for taking the time to read the article on Bến Thành Market. If you see any mistakes or would like to add more content, please feel free to do so. 
Best,
Chrisuw (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified lead, location, about the market, history, architecture and transportation
Talk:Otto Lee

message: * This page was a neutral albeit brief bio of Otto Lee, before a 1/8/08 edit added a large recitation of a minor piece of history, worded in an entirely negative manner, in such a way as to define the subject in lieu of all previous comments. The section in question also appears to be a copyright violation. This may be related to an ongoing election that the subject is involved in, as one of his opponents' pages is also in dispute for being excessively positive. Jokeboy (talk) 05:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Otis Grant

message: Below was added at below the article. It seems like private information to me and the ages are likely to be out-of-date anyway. 
his daughter is named Alexandria and she is 14 years old
his son is named Andrew and he is 9 years old
his wife i named Betty Mullins 
Boils (talk) 21:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed kids names and ages
Talk:Eden Prairie High School

message: This article is really a long laundry list.  For example, facilities list should be turned into a paragraph noting facilities highlights that would be of interest to people other than those directly involved in the school.  Refer to WP:WPSCH/AG for more information-- Lucas20 (talk) 02:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists

message: Lists of names in this article should be sourced in accordance with WP:BLP. As there is no way of constantly maintaining linked articles, this applies to names which have a Wikipedia article as well as those that do not. Any name listed with no verifiable citations should be removed. Refer to WP:NLIST for guidance. Fæ (talk) 13:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of names
Talk:Lake Placid 2

message: If you have a problem with the article, talk about it on the talk page.  Don't just keep deleting things without explanations.  You can work to improve an article, not just do mass deletion. Dream Focus (talk) 02:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop stalking me. There is no edit war, its vandalism removal pure and simple. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not stalking you.  Stop making that ridiculous conclusion.  Whenever you have a dispute with another editor, you post on the talk page, you don't just post threats to have them banned on their user page.  The editor has never made an article before.  You need to explain how things are done, and not just start deleting.  And it isn't vandalism.  Dream Focus (talk) 02:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right...because you just happened to stumble on Lake Placid 2 out of boredum? He hasn't expressed any interest in learning how things are done nor anything else. When their edit was reverted, they posted it again to their user page to make it easier for them to copy/paste it back into the article over and over, particularly when its seems pretty obvious the content was taken from somewhere even if the source isn't readily identifiable. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: With Google, all things are readily identifiable.  I just checked, and it doesn't appear anywhere else.  It looks like just one guy writing a movie review.  You could've explained things to him, but instead, just kept deleting things, without any discussion at all anywhere.  And yes, I came here after seeing you on the Wikiquette alerts‎ page, and clicking on your name, to get a wider view of the conflict there.  I am certainly not stalking you though.  Most of my contributions to wikipedia, have nothing to do with any article you've been to.  Now stay on topic please.  We need to discuss things like mature adults, not just keep deleting things, and making threats. Dream Focus (talk) 03:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When you stop making personal attacks and adding snarky side remarks to everything you say, then we might have an actual discussion. And no, with Google all things are not readily identifiable...there are many many many things in this world which are not on Wikipedia...like thousands upon thousands of books, magazine articles, etc. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you consider to be a personal attack or snide remark in my previous comment? Dream Focus (talk) 03:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Constantly saying "keep deleting things" and complaining about it. You want to discuss the article, discuss the article, but as you don't seem to have any actual interest in editing the article at all, I'm not sure what the point of this discussion is. The adding editor has not expressed any interest in communicating at all, just publishing their personal writings, violating WP:NOT -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I see an edit and revert war going on  here.
Talk:Hobbamock

message: This article could do a better job of distinguishing legend and invention from verifiable information. Hobomok was the subject of a novel, one of the earliest in American literature to have an Indian hero. Still, the novel should not be taken as a historical source. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 12:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns

message: "Hobbamock actually played a much larger role in relations with the English than Squanto, although Squanto tends to get most of the attention in history books."
Were they characters in a Reality Show? This is really quite an "unencylopedic" statement. Not to mention it is unverifiable. I wonder why there are so many articles on Wikipedia trying to disprove allegation that are never really identified and documented in the first place. It all sounds like straining at gnats. Why not actually write about what he did? 
By the way, the rating for this article must be a "gentleman's C." AnthroMimus (talk) 03:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention  

message: The "Manitou" section is silly and not related to the subject in any way shown in the section. His name may have been a psuedonym? What was he using it for, to write a mystery novel? AnthroMimus (talk) 22:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manitou
Talk:Respite

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Respite directive and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 14#Respite directive until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Respite directive" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Horace Chang

message: I added the officeholder infobox, but as you can see, it's missing almost everything. Sectori (talk) 02:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Wikipedia talk:Rollback policy (failed proposal)

message: Qualified user rollback is timely and politic. It should be the 1-admin, 15-min process used at RFR while it was semi-protected on or about January 9, 2008.  Qualified user rollback is the highest reward:risk new feature/policy available for shaping defender:vandal odds.  It satisfies users like myself who could be a more useful around the place, but aren't adminish.  Thanks in part to the several revert scripts available, interest is high and the qualified user base is substantial. Qualified user rollback diminishes the need to choke off anon edits, and I for one am convinced that anon contributers need to be encouraged to edit to the maximum extent practical. Reduced processing overhead versus scripts is a nice dividend on a fundamentally sound feature.  Whatever rollback policy is worked out, a semi-protected WP:RFR should be part of it. -- Paleorthid (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RFR

message: Rollback has a very big disadvantage in its easy to game the system particulary when two inexperienced users are fighting a pernicious vandal in that a page can often be left with the real vandals sole intent like changing a name or replacing a word with an obscene one.
The option (to hand out to non-sysops) is on Wikia and I certainly wouldn't hand it out their like candy and most wikia sites are far less objective than Wikipedia. The Undo feature largely went unnoticed when it was introduced to all users, but I think that is something too I would avoid using on wikipedia. Vandalproof and Twinkle work very well for most users on WP and as long we have those RCers then this could eventually blow up in our faces. Bpeps (talk) 11:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rollback -  Downfalls To Inexperienced Users

message: I admit I'm coming to this discussion late, but I believe we need to require at least one thing of anyone with the rollback option: that they have a valid address in their "Email this user" field. 
People make mistakes, or make controversial decisions. If user X makes several controversial rollbacks, but cannot be reached because she/he is off-wiki, this only complicates matters. A valid email would not solve this problem of communication, but it would help. And IMHO, anyone who wants to be taken seriously as a Wikipedia user -- including Admins -- should have email enabled. -- llywrch (talk) 00:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Concern over "No requirements"

message: I, an admin, have been dealing with the uncategorized categories. Edits there have been filling my contrib page, making it harder for me to find other things there. I'm considering using a separate account for that task. When I choose to do it, may I give it the rollback ability? Some of the uncategorized categories are merely vandalized versions of previously categorized categories. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giving the tool to a sub-account
Talk:Ceredigion County Council

message: I wonder if there's any information about this disgusting situation that could be sourced for inclusion in this article? Anamyd (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  They're running down the county, especially Aberystwyth, while overpaying bosses
Talk:The Mellomen

message: Is it the other Mellowmen with Thurl as the Singing Busts in the Haunted Mansion? PurpleChez (talk) 17:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grim Grinning Ghosts? 

message: Rumour has it they were the singers of Waltzing Matilda in this scene.  AMCKen (talk) 18:07, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: On The Beach

message: The Mellomen performed on The New Edgar Bergen Hour during part of, if not all of, the 1955 - 1956 season.  So far, I've only heard the  episode of November 27, 1955 ("Benny's Trailer Court" with guest Jack Benny).  I don't know if they were regular performers for that season or not.  They're not listed in Jerry Haendige's Vintage Radio Site (www.otrsite.com) for that season.  Jtyroler (talk) 07:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The New Edgar Bergen Hour
Talk:Nora Volkow

message: The major paragraph (describing her work) is written like a press release and does not cite sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.251.43.16 (talk) 19:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done some indicating that her opinions are hers in the article, now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.200.116 (talk) 10:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since this comment was made, this section has been adequately referenced. Hildabast (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this lady is surrounded by SERIOUS controversies, because she is involved in "the war against drugs" that puts marijuana and cocaine users in prison.  the anti-drug claims made by her organization NIDA often seem to be ridiculous.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.168.139 (talk) 21:52, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  did she write this article herself ? 

message: This entry doesn't have any peer-reviewed articles, other than one from 1988. I've read several of her articles in NEJM, which I think explain her ideas very well (and take stronger positions than some of these sources). I don't mind newspaper articles and TV, but I think this overdoes it.--Nbauman (talk) 20:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:MEDRS 

message: I have commenced a Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: LOL 2600:1700:BF34:8440:88F7:6BEF:E441:72B9 (talk) 21:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predicted Her Death