lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Maximum Ride: The Final Warning

message: I thought it was the uber... Mmm122 (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Director? 

message: I believe that we need to omit the 'Global Issues' section of this article; it contains trivial, opinionative, poorly-written, and unreferenced information.  I suggest that we should either integrated it into the plot summary (once we get a complete one) or taken out completely. ChyranandChloe (talk) 03:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global Issues
Talk:Fibromatosis

message: Treatment is moving away from surgery as the first line, to a last resort. Mark ong (talk) 22:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatment

message: Hi! I'm new to Wikipedia editing. Could these references be used for some of the subtypes of fibromatosis listed- https://www.mypathologyreport.ca/fibromatosis/ OR  https://tumorsurgery.org/tumor-education/soft-tissue-tumors/soft-tissue-tumor-types/fibromatosis.aspx 
Thanks!Oluwa24 (talk) 00:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Subtypes reference
Talk:GM2 gangliosidoses

message: I've re-written this page to reflect that this is an alternate name for a family of diseases. The three diseases are better known under their individual names. Therefore, the page is low importance on all medicine projects. I don't think there is anything more to be done on this page. Any additions would only duplicate information that should really reside on the other three pages. Metzenberg (talk) 04:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Ghon's complex

message: needs picture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.125.77.48 (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture is worth 1000 words 

message: It says in the description "Although they are often confused, Ranke complex and Ghon complex are not synonymous", yet the "link" to "ranke complex" redirects straight back to "ghon complex".
Maybe there should be a Ranke Complex" page?  More likely, since the concepts are so similar and fairly simple, maybe there should just be a Ranke Complex heading on the page?  Maybe it's fine like it is and the Ranke Complex link should just be removed?
These are all just suggestions, discussion is encouraged. Dryphi (talk) 15:47, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranke complex redirects here 

message: What's the difference? Should these be merged?  Gbleem (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The focus is part of the complex. That means the page is wrong. Here's a webpage I found: http://www.pathologyatlas.ro/primary-pulmonary-tuberculosis-pathology.php Gbleem (talk) 14:27, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghon complex vs. Ghon focus
Talk:Glomerulation

message: This page is rated as Start-Class on the quality scale, so more information can be added to improve the article. Sections can be added to cover diagnosis, causes, risk factors, presentation, pictures, and more. It also may be helpful to address the association of glomerulation with interstitial cystitis (IC). In addition, there are no references/citations currently listed, so this section should be updated. K10vea (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2020 Group 10 proposed edits

message: Our goals for this article is to discuss the following topics 
Expand on existing sections 
 - Presentation 
 - Relation to Interstitial Cystitis 
 - Treatment
   - Surgery? 
   - Long Term Management 
 - References 
Sections to Add 
 - Diagnosis 
 - Pathophysiology 
 - Prognosis 
 - Risk Factors 
 - Pictures
BHuynh8 (talk) 21:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2021 Group 6 proposed edits

message: PART 1
Do the group's edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review "Guiding framework"? 
* Yes, the group's edits added many reliable sources that are secondary sources such as review articles and diagnostic criteria guidelines. The group added the prognosis section which is an important piece of information about glomerulation. I also saw that the group added relevant sources for phrases that had sources missing, which added to the validity of the wikipedia article. The lead section is also a good summary that contains condensed information about the content of the subsequent sections. I think the article could be further improved by adding connecting words to make the article flow easier, and also add relevant pictures and links between wikipedia articles to help the readers read and understand glomerulation. So.Kim, future UCSF PharmD (talk) 21:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2021 Group 26 Peer Review

message: Our group has reviewed all the references and they are now correctly formatted. 
'''
Changes#1: Reference 3 and 14 were duplicates, consolidated as reference 3.  
'''
Note: Several duplicate citations were fixed on July 27, 2021.
'''
Changes#2: Reformatted a misplaced reference (reference #28) by incorporating it into text.
'''
Changes#3: Removed a reference (initially reference #19)
'''
Changes#4: Fixed publish date format for three references: references #6, #9 and #28
'''
BDeLosReyes1 (talk) 23:56, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference Review
Talk:Gorham's disease

message: Please remember that Wikipedia is not an advertising opportunity.  Please do not use this article to try to expand your organization, to increase your donor base, or to recruit patients for your studies.  Thank you.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please

message: According to MeSH (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68010015) it is a more general classification of bone syndromes, including Hajdu–Cheney syndrome. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essential osteolysis
Talk:Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

message: Consensus criteria for diagnosis and treatment  JFW | T@lk 09:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Recent review  JFW | T@lk 09:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: doi:10.1111/bjh.12138 - Diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. JFW | T@lk 21:07, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

text: doi:10.1111/bjh.12293 - Pathogenesis developments. JFW | T@lk 22:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagnosis and treatment 

message: I have made a report to Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 November 30 about my concerns that material in the article is verbatim reproduced from journal articles / book chapters by Fisman http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol6no6/fisman.htm and by Gans .  Input at the copyright report page is invited.  EdChem (talk) 09:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved. "Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Issues 

message: What, pray tell, is "CNS involvement"? The abbreviation appears only once in the article, but is never defined. It would be considerably more helpful to know what "CNS" stands for. (Apologies if I'm doing this wrong -- it's been a long time since I've used a talk page, or edited actively.) All the best!
༺།།ༀ་ཨཱཿ་ཧཱུྃ།།འཚེར།།xeltifon།།སར་ཝ་མང་ག་ལམ།།༻  {say it} { ζ(3) } {did it} 18:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Central nervous system. JFW | T@lk 13:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. ༺།།ༀ་ཨཱཿ་ཧཱུྃ།།འཚེར།།xeltifon།།སར་ཝ་མང་ག་ལམ།།༻  {say it} { ζ(3) } {did it} 01:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Prognosis: CNS Involvement?

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.14147 JFW | T@lk 22:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: doi:: 10.1002/cncr.30826 JFW | T@lk 20:57, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  When cancer causes it 

message: doi:: 10.1007/s15010-022-01786-y  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:4A0:4980:19C0:AC4D:EB5D:1D40 (talk) 22:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When SARS-CoV-2 vaccination causes it 

message: mentioned here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/mom-dies-after-brushing-off-normal-bug-bites-daughter-spoke-up-about-deadly-mistake/ar-AAZKcmr  The virus is identified in the video as the Bourbon virus. 2602:24A:DE47:B8E0:1B43:29FD:A863:33CA (talk) 09:35, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tickborne viral infection
Talk:Hemangioendothelioma

message: Hello to all! I am proposing a merge from the following articles into this article:
* Epithelioid sarcoma-like hemangioendothelioma
* Endovascular papillary hemangioendothelioma
* Composite hemangioendothelioma
* Spindle cell hemangioendothelioma
* Infantile hemangioendothelioma
* Retiform hemangioendothelioma
* Hobnail hemangioendothelioma
* Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma
The following hemangioendothelioma-related article is NOT proposed for merging:
* Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma
This is for the following reasons:
* The main article would benefit significantly from having all this information in one place.
* These articles are very short in length (1-2 sentences) and have not been edited significantly in 3-4 years.
* This knowledge shouldn't be obscured from readers of this article by virtue of being isolated in an obscure article of 1-2 lines.
* These topics may receive more attention by being mentioned in the main article.
* The articles, if needs be, could be re-expanded at a later date.
Kind Regards, LT90001 (talk) 05:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: With no objections, I have completed this merge. LT90001 (talk) 00:20, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Hereditary inclusion body myopathy

message: This still needs a lot of clean up work -- lots of words need to have internal links, and several sentences need to be moved into different sections -- but it's at least somewhat better now. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: There has been some unsourced text on this since 2008, but my attempts to add a sourced update, and explain link to the GNE gene (easily verified at GNE (gene)) were [reverted]. It would be more helpful to explain the objection (does it apply to the first or second part of my edit?) - Rod57 (talk) 11:57, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: i added some content based on a recent review. Jytdog (talk) 12:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Needs more detail. Next time please take more care before reverting with accusations of SPAM or PROMO. - Rod57 (talk) 10:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The studies of sialic acid for GNE myopathy need better description
Talk:Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome

message: I would just like to say that the way this page is written is HORRIBLE - to someone who has a family member who MAY have this condition, it reads more like "death is a certainty by age 50" than anything.  I know that's probably not the intention, but I want the author to know that my wife potentially has this syndrome (and is being tested for it), and upon learning the name, this was the first place to hit, and I was absolutely DEVASTATED at what appeared to be a prognosis.  I know that Wikipedia is not a definitive source for medical information and that one should always consult a doctor, but in trying to learn about what this syndrome is, people who potentially have it and their families need to be aware that there ARE varying degrees here, and that contraction of Pulmonory Fibrosis is NOT guaranteed and that not all people who contract it present that symptom or are doomed to die by age 50.
There is NOTHING quite as upsetting as having something life-threatening presented as a certainty when it affects a loved one.  I urge the author of this article to revise this and explain about the varying degrees that this can manifest in, and while it is a serious condition and there are elements that treatment options are extremely limited for, soften the blow so others don't have to go through what I went through - fearing the imminent loss of a loved one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.134.182.200 (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Based on this Retraction Notice to: A BLOC-1 Mutation Screen Reveals that PLDN Is Mutated in Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome Type 9., which was based on an investigaton by The United States Office of Research Integrity, which determined that the lead author, Andrew R. Cullinane “falsified and/or fabricated the results" presented in one of the figures in the paper, I have removed two sentences and reference based on that paper, which was added in good faith by , who could not have known about the misconduct. JeanOhm (talk) 01:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit due to retraction
Talk:Heterotopic ossification

message: I've added several summary sections automatically generated by a research project which sources information to several sites on the web.  Please edit and improve this text.  69.141.131.254 (talk) 03:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Automatically Generated Summary

message: I suffered an episode of transverse myelitis early in 2002.  The spinal cord was stripped of its insulating myelin sheath by lymphocytes attacking an active shingles infection of the spinal cord.  Almost immediately my right hip became swollen and painful.  The poor physical therapist who tried to do range of motion exercises on my flaccid legs was often pushed back by the right leg.  Later x-rays of the hip showed an abnormality which was interpreted as an abscess.  The surgeon tried to drain it, using a long needle, with no results. My physiatrist stopped by my hospital room and knew immediately that it was no abscess, but the beginning of the growth of heterotopic bone. Errikker (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heterotropic ossification
Talk:Hippocampal sclerosis

message: Should we merge this page with Mesial temporal sclerosis? AIUI the two are very closely linked, if not essentially the same. Neurotip (talk) 15:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on this consensus I've merged these two articles. LT90001 (talk) 12:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

text: I agree.  There are also many incorrect statements that need to be corrected.  I am now working on a rewrite. TMM53 (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: Hello, A substantial part of this article is incorrect, outdated, unorganized, and grammatically incorrect e.g. no quotation marks for content copied directly from sources.  A minor revision is not possible.  The link contains a proposed revision.  I retained, updated, and corrected as much as possible.  If the proposed revision has errors or problems, please let me know.  I will check back in 2 weeks.  Thanks..
User:TMM53/HippocampalSclerosis-2023-04-18
TMM53 (talk) 07:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision
Talk:Horizontal disease transmission

message: It seemed a majority of "What links here" came from Template:Infectious disease. I've updated the template to redirect this term directly to Transmission_(medicine)#horizontal, but it takes a while to update the "What links here", so there may be other incoming links that I haven't amended. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Hyperkeratosis

message: This article, upon my arrival, had no citations; therefore, I have removed the unreferenced text, and added the strict definition of hyperkeratosis.  I hope I have not stepped on any toes here, and would love some help with this article.  Please just cite your sources. Kilbad (talk) 01:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see by "removed the unreferenced text" you meant "deleted everything". æ has never been so accurate. (See their page on 'Citation needed'. I'd provide the link but the fascists here have seen fit to blacklist it. Bureaucratic fucks indeed.) God damn Wikipedia wikipedians suck nowadays. —Anon 15:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rewrite

message: Synonyms? Lesion (talk) 12:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Keratosis]] 

message: Synonyms? Lesion (talk) 12:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Keratosis]] 

message: This site  http://www.drugs.com/health-guide/hyperkeratosis.html seemed to give a simple and understandable definition. I realize the granule stuff etc is relevant for scientists, but could someone with the knowledge to distinguish it please add some of this in?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ukrpickaxe (talk • contribs) 20:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Layman's terms request?
Talk:Hyperlysinemia

message: Before reverting someone's edits, you should have some reason to believe that they are incorrect. Please try to find sources yourself. 98.217.158.136: Thank you for finding a proper source. Per CIRCULAR, links to other Wikipedia articles are not considered sources. Both of you please discuss problems on the talk page instead of engaging in an edit war. RockMagnetist(talk) 22:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Stfu nigg 2601:281:D47F:82E0:799F:4D4C:113D:C3DB (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit war
Talk:Hypervolemia

message: Plethora redirects to this article. Why? --Abdull (talk) 19:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I see no significant history (the article was deleted once before for being a dictdef) so I'm going to delete the redirect. Bryan Derksen (talk) 23:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  plethora 

message: The See also section links to Apsia, which redirects to Association of Professional Schools of International Affairs. This association does not appear to be related to Hypervolemia, but I don't know enough about either to be certain.  It seems to me that if this link was meant to refer to the association, it should be capitalized as in APSIA, as it is on the association's wiki page. Being in normal case suggests it's a medical condition, in which case either Apsia should be a stub page for the condition, or the link in See also should be removed.  tsilb (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apsia
Talk:Hypoalbuminemia

message: Weekly Work Plan
# Mon 11/4 WP-WIP #1: I will have written a new introductory paragraph as well as provided a comprehensive definition of hypoalbuminemia that incorporates the information currently on this page.
# Fri 11/8 WP-WIP #2: I will have added sections on the biology of hypoalbuminemia that includes the common causes and consequences of it. 
# Fri 11/15 WP-WIP #3: I will have added sections on the clinical relevance of hypoalbuminemia including screening tools and treatments. 
# Fri 11/22 WP-WIP #4: I will finish the article and incorporate peer feedback into it. 
Why this one? Include WP rating scale? How fit with your interests? Hypoalbuminemia is a commonly found incidental finding in a broad array of diagnostic workups and is rarely followed up with appropriate counseling. Due to the commonality of this finding alongside its lower clinical utility, it is graded as of medium importance on Wikipedia. Therefore, having readily available information for patients is imperative to allay concerns and ensure appropriate long-term follow-up. As a pediatrician, this finding is common but uncommonly discussed with patients. This makes it interesting to me specifically. 
Initial Analysis of the article: Currently, this Wikipedia article gives a broad overview of the existence of hypoalbuminemia as well as a few of the most common causes but does not provide much with respect to focused clinical information as well as patient (or provider) education. The minimal discussion likely contributed to its rating as a stub article by Wikipedia editors. 
Overall organization, what changes: Currently, the page lacks an organizational theme and is instead a list of facts. I aim to break this down into sections on biological and clinical relevance including sub-sections as described above. 
What will you augment? What will you add? I aim to increase the utility of this page by expounding upon the information already provided by diving deeper into the medical literature on the already-discussed topics (liver, kidney, edema, anion gap, etc.), in addition to expanding the scope to include underlying biology, common causes, consequences, means of monitoring, and treatments that are relevant to patients with hypoalbuminemia, specifically. I will also structure it in a way to be consistent with the Wikipedia guidelines for medical articles. 
What will you remove? What will you decrease coverage of? All of this information is relevant but unorganized. I aim to incorporate all of it in my final edits. 
  
I am interested in hearing other input on what could be added to this page to make it more useful to readers.
--Naharris2 (talk) 16:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Med Work Plan
Talk:Łosice

message: Talk Losice.
In 1942 virtually the entire Jewish population ( 6,400 of a total of 8,000 ) of Losice was eliminated. Herded by the Nazis into the town square where they were then led to Siedlce 18 miles to the west and from here to the death camp at Treblinka. At the same time the Jewish cemetery was destroyed with it's gravestones ( matzevot )removed and transported to a local residence which the Nazis took over to serve as it's gendarme headquarters for the region. Here the gravestones were buried to serve as a courtyard. In 2003 approximately 1,500 gravestones were recovered. On October the 8th, 2007 construction began on a project which would see these gravestones return to the pre-W.W.II site of Losice's Jewish cemetery. In conjunction with this restoration a memorial will be erected in memory of those Jews whose lives were lost because of the brutality of the Holocaust. 24.76.91.102 23:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The section quoted below is unsourced, and bordering on anti-Semitic. If it remains, editorializing about Jewish disloyalty to Poland must be removed, and it must be rigorously sourced. My spouse’s relatives were among those from Losice who died in Treblinka.
“Once again, whoever writes it conveniently forgets to mention Jewish collaboration with invading Bolsheviks in 1920 and 1939. Triumph arches decorated with flowers were built for them and prosecution and extermination of local Polish patriots began. This was act of treason of the country that gave Jews shelter and place to live over the centuries. Many Poles were taken to the gulags with Jewish collaboration and many have died in Jewish- Bolsheviks pogroms. Similar atrocities occurred in many towns in eastern Poland.” 2601:283:487F:C5FC:2153:D513:FDCB:5062 (talk) 04:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, I am working on proper publishing the facts and erecting memorial to people exterminated by Soviets and their collaborators. 2A00:23C5:2B88:6F01:CD66:1508:EB61:D535 (talk) 08:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced and Claims of Jewish Collaboration Leading to “extermination of local Polish patriots”
Talk:Hypoplasia

message: i was just looking at the article for digeorge syndrome, and i  encountered this form of making the adjective. i was taught and have always used 'hypoplastic'. has anyone else ever heard this word used? i changed it and now i'm not sure that it may not be an acceptable alternative.Toyokuni3 (talk) 03:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hypoplasiac?

message: tump 2409:4056:DB7:ADAA:0:0:DF0B:F106 (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tump bone losses
Talk:Intestinal atresia

message: If "apple peel syndrome" is a synonym for "intestinal atresia",
or if "intestinal atresia" is a superset of "apple peel syndrome",
then I would suggest mentioning the latter by name, to make it
easier to find when a search is done. Thomas.Hedden (talk) 13:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Apple peel syndrome
Talk:Ischemic optic neuropathy

message: Biousse V and Newman NJ
Review Article: Ischemic Optic Neuropathies
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1413352
N Engl J Med. June 18, 2015; 372:2428-2436. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1413352
Carla Rothaus
Ischemic Optic Neuropathies
http://blogs.nejm.org/now/index.php/ischemic-optic-neuropathies/2015/06/19/
Now@NEJM. June 19th, 2015
--Nbauman (talk) 04:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEJM 2015