Talk:Pantograph (transport)

message: How can the pantograph be described as an improvement on the trolley pole when the respective wiki pages suggest the trolley pole was invented later rather than first?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.58.51 (talk) 03:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

message: At the beginning of the article, a distinction is made between a full diamond pantograph, and the "half-panto".  Is this the same distinction involving the one-arm and two-arm pantographs later in the article?  If this confuses me, it will confuse the average reader. Tmangray 00:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's to differentiate between diamond pantographs, and two half-pantographs joined together. There is a slight difference in the design - the latter could be said to be an evolution of the former. The terminology used in this article is a little confusing, however. Speaking of pantographs, why is a single arm one less suited to going in reverse? The mechanism must be capable of handling both directions equally, otherwise rollingstock such as the TGV would have their pantographs aligned to the direction of travel, which they don't. Robbie aka Zoqaeski 12:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify one-arm, two arm vs. full panto, half panto

message: Doesn't New York Subway use third rail? Oldie 20:18, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NY Subway third rail

message: I have removed a few items which are clearly not metros  from the 'List of metro systems using pantographs'; the point of the list is not to list every railway with pantographs in the world, but to point out metros using pantographs, as they are relatively unusual.
There are a few left in the list that seem borderline between metros and either commuter railways or trams, but I've left them for the time being. David Arthur 17:59, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
:Once again, I have removed several items from this list which are clearly not metros. Street-running trams (including most, though not all, systems calling themselves 'light rail') and main-line trains are valuable forms of transport, but the fact is that it is quite normal for them to use pantographs. This list exists specifically because, despite its growing length, it remains unusual for metros to use anything other than third-rail power. David Arthur 22:34, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of metro systems using pantographs 

message: This entire list is pointless.  I vote for removing it.  One might as well have a "list of metro systems using wheels".  jmd 01:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  That kind of technical detail can be mentioned on those articles; no need to collect it here.  --CComMack 16:18, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

text: As it is now, the article is informative. At the time of this discussion (which is more than three years old), there was an uninformative and mislabelled section listing every pantograph-using railway that any editor cared about. David Arthur (talk) 17:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete section entitled "List of metro systems using pantographs" 

message: I have removed "expensive and" from this paragraph as it is at best debatable: 
"Pantographs with overhead wires are now the dominant form of current collection for modern electric trains because, although more expensive and fragile than a third-rail system, they allow the use of higher voltages."
I think that is justified by this Rail Safety and Standards Board report: http://www.rssb.co.uk/sitecollectiondocuments/pdf/reports/research/T950_rpt_final.pdf
 
Page 3 states that 25kV AC overhead has lower capital and operating costs.
Pages 70 and 72 state that it makes economic sense (at least in one case) to convert 3rd rail to overhead.
Chris.Bristol (talk) 02:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Details 

message: An electric bus charging station has been added at the Angrignon metro station (Montreal Metro). Watch that talk page and its article because in due time someone will add the details. The installation incorporates a stationary pantograph. Peter Horn User talk 18:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stationary pantograph 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pantograph (transport). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402135818/http://iei.org.au/download.php to http://iei.org.au/download.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Note to myself: go to Erith Road, Bexleyheath and shoot my versions of the images on this page.
The ABB TOSA bus system uses a more conventional arrangement with pantograph rising from the bus. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverse pantograph