Talk:European Neighbourhood Policy

message: This Ukrainian source quotes Ukraine's deputy foreign minister saying that with adaptation of the action plan for the association agreement with EU Ukraine effectively quit ENP: http://www.radioera.com.ua/eranews/?idArticle=16844   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andriy155 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ukraine quitting ENP? 

message: The map is out of date after Bulgaria and Romania joined. 84.50.13.143 17:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: also: "The countries covered include all of the Mediterranean shores of Africa and Asia, as well as the European CIS states (with the exception of Russia and Kazakhstan) in the Caucasus and Eastern Europe." yet Russia is marked in brown on the map, surely this should be the grey of individual agreements? Grunners 20:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the deal with Russia? I thought Russia had a seperate agreement? The previous poster has a point. Peregrine981 03:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Russia is covered by the same EU instrument as the ENP states - ENPI (European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument). So it is covered by the same basic EU strategy and policy documents as the ENP. Alinor 06:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd really like a source on that please.  My understanding was that Russia is not part of the ENP, and the EU's official map does not show Russia as being part of the ENP .  I'd change the map myself, but have no technical skills whatsoever, but would someone please do it, unless a source is forthcoming...  Nicolasdz 20:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

text: So, I have seen a few sources which suggest that EU funding to Russia does fall under the ENPI, but that is not the same as being part of the ENP, and the map on the ENP page shoud still be changed to reflect that.  Nicolasdz 20:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: Check this out -  - currently they have a paper about ENP on the front page. The summary uses the Wikipedia ENP map. but has "(c) Copyright CEPS" below it. Shouldn't they place "(c) Wikipedia" instead??? Alinor 06:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol, unless we stole their map.  I have no idea, but they really should be acknowledging Wikipedia if that's the case. Nicolasdz 20:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we haven't stolen their map, because I have made it (out of a blank Wikipedia map). Maybe there is some place/admin in Wikipedia that should be alerted to discuss with ceps.be to change the copyright to "(c) Wikipedia" ... Alinor 17:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: An anonymous editor has repeatedly removed an apostrophe, using some shoddy logic to claim that it is incorrect to use a possessive apostrophe for acronyms.  However, the WP:MOS specifically states that "Acronyms, like other nouns, become plurals by adding -s or -es (they produced three CD-ROMs in the first year; the laptops were produced with three different BIOSes in 2006). As with other nouns, no apostrophe is used unless the form is a possessive."  Also, the EU itself uses an apostrophe so it seems highly unlikely that this is improper grammar as claimed.
Of course, using EU as a Noun adjunct ("EU outermost regions") as the anon prefers isn't necessarily wrong either, but switching back and forth mid sentence ("EU (specifically France's) outermost regions") sounds terribly sloppy.  What do others think?  TDL (talk) 02:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The wording sounded a bit awkward to me, so I reworded the sentence for clarity.  As for grammar, the only poor grammar I can see is the use of "which" when "that" should be used.  "Which" follows a comma; if there is no comma, then "that" is preferred.  Initialisms and acronym's are definitely allowed to show possessiveness like any other proper noun. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 21:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Your changes look good.  Thanks for the input!  TDL (talk) 22:16, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, TDL – I hope this sets well with the IP contributor, also. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 22:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: EU or EU's

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on European Neighbourhood Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5mqfQ6Tl4 to http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130405225425/http://travel.state.gov/pdf/FY06.pdf to http://travel.state.gov/pdf/CombinedRefusalRate.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130405225425/http://travel.state.gov/pdf/FY06.pdf to http://travel.state.gov/pdf/FY06.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090226023335/http://travel.state.gov/pdf/FY07.pdf to http://travel.state.gov/pdf/FY07.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110622055048/http://travel.state.gov/pdf/FY08.pdf to http://travel.state.gov/pdf/FY08.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on European Neighbourhood Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140310140117/http://www.kent.ac.uk/politics/gec/GECpolicypaper1.pdf to http://www.kent.ac.uk/politics/gec/GECpolicypaper1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on European Neighbourhood Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.eu.int/comm/external_relations/kazakhstan/intro/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091010034624/http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Minisite/widereurope/index.html to http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Minisite/widereurope/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140426235959/http://www.enpi-info.eu/library/ to http://www.enpi-info.eu/library/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified