Talk:M35 series 2½-ton 6×6 cargo truck

message: Downrated to Start for lack of citations Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

message: Would it make sense to create a separate wikiarticle, listing the military users of this truck family? I know for sure that the Argentine Army was (and probably still is) user of it, where it was commonly known as "REO". Regards, DPdH (talk) 01:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of military users? 

message: The truck was a cargo carrier, but how many men could it seat in back? 12,16 or 20? 68.7.39.127 (talk) 16:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Misssing Criteria

message: infobox says: "Produced 1950–present" 
I wouldn't think that's correct.  When did they stop making them? MartinezMD (talk) 02:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still in production? 

message: In the U.S. vehicles are sometimes described by “wheels” rather than axles, with two wheels per axle. Dual rear tires are mounted closely parallel to each other on a common hub, and do not move in relation to each other, acting as single wheels, and are more of a tire option than a mechanical difference. Both the M34 and M35 have six “wheels”, even though the M35 has 10 tires. The "6x6" number is “number of wheels X of number wheels powered”, “6X6” means all three axles are powered.Sammy D III (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  6x6 

message: The M35 2½-ton cargo truck was often referred to as a "deuce and a half" by U.S. Army personnel; and as a "six by six" by U.S. Navy, U.S. Coast Guard and U.S Marine Corps personnel. Tjlynnjr (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: G.I. slang

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on M35 series 2½-ton 6x6 cargo truck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090506120537/http://www.fuerzasmilitares.org/armamento/ejc_blindado_m35/ejc_blindado_M-35.html to http://www.fuerzasmilitares.org/armamento/ejc_blindado_m35/ejc_blindado_M-35.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Ring mounts could be fitted over the cab for mounting M2 BMG. Infantry battalions in the 82 Abn each had 6 M35s, 4 assigned to mess halls. Use of the ring mounts was discouraged because 1. 50 cal was difficult to get. (Every round we ever got was left over from WWII.) 2. Firing from the ring mount loosened a lot in the truck necessitating re-tightening by the motor pool. 3. The first time we mounted ours was a bitch. Had to clean off the cosmoline and figure out the process. 4. Mess personnel hated having to do anything outside of duty hours. This Lieutenant and the S-4 NCOIC overcame the obstacles and did it. Results were amazing! No weapon is more fun to fire than a ma deuce. Ever after even the cooks were asking when they could do it again. Was in 1971 with 2/325. Stout Iron (talk) 14:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armament