lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mia and Tia

message: As of current, this article is merely a copy of what is posted at List of Cars characters here: . -WarthogDemon 20:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now just tried to revamp the article.  It still needs expansion but it's not simply a copy anymore. WarthogDemon 20:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding 

message: If Boost, Wingo, Snot Rod, and DJ don't get their own article, neither do the twins. Either delete this or bring back the DRH article. If you're so concerned with the fact that they're never actually called the Delinquent Road Hazards, call the article "Boost, Wingo, Snot Rod, and DJ" or some mix of that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.224.53.218 (talk) 04:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think (almost) everyone in a Pixar movie should have their own article. SOMEONE bring back the DRH article back! I'm begging! PLEASE!!! By the way, this would shorten the Cars article. ANNAfoxlover 21:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Mia and Tia deserve to keep their article! By all means! Keep this article; the Spanish one (translated as "Mine and Aunt") is pending deletion, and they're the only Cars characters to have a article in Spanish. No other character does. -dogman15 03:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh-uh, they don't deserve their own article
Talk:Tatsu Aoki

message: Shouldn't the name/page be Tatsuyuki Aoki instead of Tatsu Aoki?
37.191.5.234 (talk) 07:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Is he a U.S. citizen? If so, when did he obtain his U.S. citizenship? Badagnani (talk) 04:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, but the link  refers to him as an Asian American (page 15 of the pdf). — Myasuda (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenship

message: The "Biography" section reads as if it were plagiarized straight from another internet article.  It's also completely unsourced. The article also lacks, but needs, a "Discography" section. Acwilson9 (talk) 02:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Either I missed the Discography section in June, or else someone has since added it.  (If the latter, thank you.)  Acwilson9 (talk) 02:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Biography section is choppy and too long, so should be split into coherent sections, with less puffery (unless sourced, perhaps via quotations) and more citations. (I don't have time time to do it myself right now, but maybe later.  Aoki is legitimately a great musician & organizer, IMO.) Acwilson9 (talk) 04:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography and Discography
Talk:Diedre Murray

message: It would be great to add a photo of Ms. Murray. Badagnani (talk) 18:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Is she African American? Badagnani (talk) 18:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. See the cover of Stringology (click on image at the Black Saint store page). 86.139.226.98 (talk) 23:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: African American?

message: Where in Brooklyn (which neighborhood) was she born and in which neighborhood of Queens does she live? Badagnani (talk) 23:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Queens/Brooklyn
Talk:Outline of photography

message: Made a few additions, and moved the Basic Photography Concepts section higher up. I believe this article could do with a bit of a cosmetic make-over, and I aim to have one done by the end of next week. Any objections, contact me here.
--Zest777 (talk) 00:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Changes 

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: A discussion is underway that may affect the name of this article.
See: Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Should articles named "Outline of x" be renamed to "List of x topics"?
The Transhumanist 04:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Straw poll and discussion concerning what outlines should be called 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:08, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines 

message: Hii my Abhay I am a student. I hope all my friends you are very happy 💞 Royal army gff (talk) 16:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nature
Talk:Amorphous computing

message: Good start.  Needs more detail and a few graphics.
Specific tools, algorithms, and patterns should be marked as such out - an algorithm is not likely to be
the same thing as a pattern (if you intend to list patterns (in the GOF sense)) would be helpful to identify, 
but should then reference running implementations.
Similarly, algorithms should reference source code for the algorithms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.101.136.61 (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tools/Algorithms/Patterns section 
Talk:Susan Cummings (actress)

message: I just watched the episode "To Serve Man" on tv (but didn't have the vcr running). I think that the actor shown in the photo on this page is not Richard Kiel. The Kanamit played by Richard Kiel wore a white robe. It seems IMDB doesn't credit the other actor.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjedicke (talk • contribs) 20:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: She was also Rita Renee, in The Ransom of Rita Renee, in The Rough Riders, on June 11th of 1959.  ;) 47.25.173.160 (talk) 03:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rita Renee, in The Ransom of Rita Renee, in The Rough Riders, June 11th of 1959, an omission
Talk:Evangeline Adams

message: The initial section is too long (as often in W.P.). It should only contain the first sentence. The following sentences, while containing useful information, should be placed under subsequent sections and headlines; a new sub-section "Works" or "Books" should be included. -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 13:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article structure 

message: The reference to Crowley may be misplaced. Was it that Editor's Intro that alleged plagiarism? Did the same editor relate the story about the convinced jurist as well? Bn (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: This is a piss-poor article.  It needs to be thrown out and rewritten from the ground up.  Here are two references:  
Forseeing the Future, by Karen Christino, published by One Reed Publications, Amherst, MA, in 2002
and,
What Evangeline Adams Knew, by Karen Christino, published by Stella Mira Books, Brooklyn Heights, NY, 2004.
Both books are copiously referenced.  Dave of Maryland (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a general reworking 

message: Lede says: February 8, 1868 at 8:30 am – November 10 or 12, 1932.
Article says: Adams was born on 8 February 1859 Valetude (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy
Talk:Edward Abramowski

message: , this stub is tagged for expansion from the Polish version, which only has a handful of sourced passages to import. Would you be able to lend a hand on this old stub of yours? I'm happy to help with the rest of the cleanup. czar 12:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In am not sure I will find time to do proper research (look for sources) in the near future. But I'll note that these days Google machine translation from Polish->English is very good, so all of this 'please translate' stuff is much less dependent on native speakers than was in the past. PS. You may want to copy your request to WT:POLAND. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've found Google Translate workable for western European languages, but still leaves a bit to be desired with Polish. Was mainly looking for translation of the plwp article's sourced passages. I can take a pass and try the other channel as needed. ty! czar 13:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

text: * Thanks, ! Much better. (not watching, please  as needed)  czar 04:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Austin Dowling

message: Starting in the section on immigration, it looks like there are direct quotes from sources without any context in our own words. I don't understand enough about the specific topic to try to paraphrase this, but if someone can, that would be great. There are also some tone issues that come up near the end of the entry. Thanks! Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Immigration section - direct quotes without context
Talk:Roland Allen

message: I don't have time to revise this article, and thought I could just add a photo. I added a ref which includes a photo, but can't determine whether it was taken before 1923 (tho I suspect so--the subject died in Kenya at a very ripe old age in 1947).Jweaver28 (talk) 12:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture and rewrite needed
Talk:Illinois's 10th congressional district

message: 24.148.11.64 was me.  Sorry.  Adrade 20:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Santa Maria delle Grazie, Milan

message: I made a slight change to improve readability.  I'm a little concerned that there is no reference for most of the facts here, but didn't want to litter the page with  tags.  If anyone knows any sources for this information, it might be nice to put them in the article.  Ruad (talk) 12:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The current text claims that "[d]ue to preservation, the main painting of The Last Supper has now been safe for many centuries." Now though that might be true for the most recent of restorations, the most of them did only damage to the fresco. The original technique, painting with oils on dry secco, was highly experimental at the time the mural was made, and it began to flake off within a century. Several preservation efforts are claimed to mostly have damaged the painting. (several sources have a similar wording, e.g. Stockstad, Cothren Art History, 4th ed.).
The text has been changed to be more in line with the fact that preservations and restorations took place during several centuries, yet most of them didn't have very beneficial effect on the painting.
Sjlain (talk) 08:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Preservations
Talk:Montana Federation of Public Employees

message: I find it interesting that the powers that be at Wikipedia think an article about one of the largest labor unions in the state of Montana is of "low" importance. Yes, it would be nice to comply with Wikipedia standards. In the meantime there is information here that I have not seen anywhere else. It raises a question in one's mind whether Wikipedia exists to promulgate punctiliously academic tomes or information that people can use. MacSigh (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance rating
Talk:Don Mancini

message: He sometimes goes by the pseudonym Kit Du Bois (also spelled Kit Dubois).
Does he still sometimes go by this pseudonym today, as the above sentence suggests?
According to his filmography, he's used this pseudonym precisely once - nearly twenty years ago, before he achieved success under his own name with the Child's Play franchise. 217.155.20.163 (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He sometimes goes by the pseudonym Kit Du Bois" 

message: I request the removal of the said film. There is no solid evidence (nor reference) of this film's existence. 65.28.232.17 (talk) 17:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Revenge of Chucky?" 

message: Hi my name is Tommy and I wanted to be in Chucky please 2601:84:8601:2080:449C:223A:8F4D:739B (talk) 08:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chucky
Talk:Kazuhiro Nakamura

message: Hi guys,
Please, do you know a reliable source for Nakamura birthdate ? Based on JudoInside, it is February 21, 1979. But Sherdog gives July 16, 1979. Consequently, French and English versions of this page does not report the same date.
Jgui (talk) 12:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate
Talk:Ward McAllister

message: This article is a mess. It's disorganized (the famous 400 list is mentioned out of nowhere in the second paragraph as just "the list" before the info which explains what the list actually was even appears, an irrelevant remark about a letter he (McAllister) wrote appears out of nowhere and is disconnected with the rest of the passage, etc.), contradictory (we are told the list contained mostly newly rich industrialists but then we are told he kept the "new rich" out of the list), and filled with speculative mind reading of long deceased peoples supposed motives ("pleasure-seeking, status-conscious rich of the Gilded Age." Say's who? There is no way you can tell what every single rich persons beliefs and desires were in the so-called "Gilded Age." And who the hell isn't "pleasure seeking?") Needs major work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.239.197.45 (talk) 05:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My introduction to "Ward McAllister" came from a book about Babe Ruth by sportswriter Tom Meany that I bought at a grade school book fair, although it is apparent that this statement is light years beyond grade schoolers: "George Bernard Shaw found more gold in snobbishness than Ward McAllister ever dreamed could be mined in that particular field."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BubbleDine (talk • contribs) 16:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The issue of his social 'disgrace' needs to be clarified. It sounds as though he was ostracised by the traditional elite (self-appointed anyway) for bestowing official respectability on arrivistes. Valetude (talk) 23:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Disgrace' 

message: The listing of his children and their marriages reads more like a wiki page on royalty or a major head of state. They have no notability, and I feel the listing is out of place here. Valetude (talk) 00:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  His issue
Talk:Richard Huish College, Taunton

message: There is another Richard Huish College page.  It is very brief and this one contains far more detail.  Suggest info from the other is integrated here, and the other page is deleted.  carena 20:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am in no way involved with or knowledgeable about this school, but I noticed that someone mentioned on the Arthur C. Clarke article that the school was Huish Grammar School when ACC attended it. It might be worth including something here to explain its history as a grammar school, if only to tie up the links with former pupils. SMeeds 21:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huish Grammar School 

message: I have tried to clarify with wikilinks the various types of A levels available. The current article mentions AVCE, but the article about this (Vocational Certificate of Education) suggests they are no longer being used. Can anyone clarify this in the article please? Derek Andrews 18:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A levels 

message: Trivia is not encouraged on Wikipedia. The trivia section on this article should be referenced and integrated into the main body of the article or deleted. --TimTay (talk) 09:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: A banner was added to this page in February 2016 saying "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." Presumably this relates to: User:RichardHuishCollege and User:Tilly4p who are named at the top of this talk page. It has been edited several times since then with edit summaries such as "tone down promotional material" and "Rm unsourced puffery". Do people think enough has been done to remove promotional material - and hence remove the banner - or are there areas where more needs to be done?— Rod talk 16:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close connection banner
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-28 Zeno's Paradoxes and Geomeric series

message: Zeno's paradox is emphatically NOT about Quantum Physics.  It is a purely mathematical construct in a perfect mathematical world that has perfect mathematical continuity.  It is a world in which there is NO Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, NO Schrödinger's wave equation for the runner, and MOST DEFINITELY this paradox has no context in a world where Special Relativity is imposed by Lorenz invariance of a finite speed of light. If it did, it would beget many more paradoxes than that of the possibility of motion.
One need not "measure" or "observe" the speed of the runner (nor his momentum or even his position), because it is DEFINED that he runs with a velocity v relative to an idealized ground that needs no friction for him to run, and the runner himself has no mass.  One need not quibble about energy fluctuations in the quantum foam of space, because it is defined as a MATHEMATICAL space in which there is no zero point energy nor Kip Thorne's wormholes, which in this context are even more fictional a construct than Zeno's Paradox. 70.106.60.44 21:04, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:F minor

message: The Imperial March is played in at least three different keys in the Star Wars movies. Most of the time it's in G minor, and the first part shows up in E minor occasionally; the only time I can remember it being played in F minor is when Vader dies. If it's going to be listed on any page, it should probably be the G minor page. PiGuy314 (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Songs to be checked

message: Add these songs if you can find sources for them: Dream On--Aerosmith, Getaway--Earth, Wind, and Fire Staying Alive--The Bee Gees  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.158.8.234 (talk) 01:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for Songs

message: I propose that the article E-sharp minor be merged into F minor unless we can find a source or a musical composition using e as a key, like their is for G. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 02:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree, I've never seen one piece of music composed in e. Furries (Talk) 21:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose that means you support the merge? Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

text: We can put a section in F minor talking about its enharmonic equivalent E minor (which seems to be the norm). Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Not true. When theorists analyze pieces, any place where a piece has modulated is considered in a "new key." Although, I understand your point from a title perspective. No composer will start a piece in E# minor unless they're doing it to be different, and that's not good enough reason to have it there. Devin.chaloux (talk) 13:23, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: It lists only classical compositions, but there are actually quite a few pop songs in F minor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.146.117 (talk) 13:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable compositions section is biased
Talk:Biocommunication (science)

message: Speedy deletion is disputed. I'm adding content today.Trilobitealive 21:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This is an article about the science of biocommunication. Please limit contributions here to material which is Wikipedia:verifiable as scientific work on the subject. Please post information related to Biocommunication (paranormal) in an article on that subject, either the Plant perception (paranormal) article or another related article which can be developed and posted. Thanks Trilobitealive 20:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Starting talk page
Template talk:FTSE 100 Index constituents

message: Hello - are you aware that the 'What links here' list for every company listed now shows all 100 companies?  It makes this feature far less useful. - Crosbiesmith 20:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean that the 'What links here' for J Sainsbury, for example, shows the other 99 companies? I don't see how that is a problem. I think the template is very useful, despite this apparent problem. Mark83 21:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a problem because I now have to examine each of these ninety-nine entries to find the particular entries relevant to Sainsbury's.  I've written more about this issue at Wikipedia_talk:Navigational_templates - Crosbiesmith 21:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Impact on 'What links here' page
Talk:Rain Parade

message: Rainy Day wasn't really a "band". It was a project featuring members from other Paisley Underground bands.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.203.70.87 (talk) 05:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rainy Day 

message: I remember hearing/reading somewhere years ago that RP, along with [The Three O'Clock] were a crucial early influence on The Stone Roses. I think Mani might have said it on that BBC Radio 1 documentary on TSR in 1998.  If someone can firm this up it should go on this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.110.242 (talk) 12:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Stone Roses
Talk:George Arliss

message: And who can forget Hancock's disastrous impression of Arliss at 'Hancock at the Royal Festival Hall' 1966. Without Galton and Simpson he had evidently fallen back on his variety routines of the late 1940's. Most of Hancock's fan base were wartime and post war baby boomers - there was desultory laughter petering out to puzzled clapping - they had never heard of George Arliss. 'What do you mean - never heard of him. He only died 40 years ago' quipped Hancock (though in fact it was only 20 years).109.144.208.77 (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Tony Hancock impression
Talk:Glass bottomed boat

message: There seems to have been some confusion between a glass bottomed boat and a hot carl. The hot carl involves saran wrap over the face of the partner being defecated upon, NOT the GBB. I also included a link to the defunct Hot Carl wikipedia article while I search for a reference for it elsewhere. Txtimetraveler 21:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Nominated for deletion due to substantive content, or the lack thereof in addition to not meeting WP:Note. Thank you. Feel free to discuss reasoning here. Carter | Talk it up 08:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: I (boldly) made this a redirect to Glass-bottom boat; admins can always undo it if they think I overstepped... Deltopia 16:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Eastside, Paterson

message: This information is completely wrong and needs to be deleted.  Accurate information that had been here before has been deleted and inaccurate information has now replaced it.  
What this writer is describing is a set of neighborhoods in Eastern Paterson but none of them are known as Eastside.  I urge the writer to stop deleting information and also to stop adding wrong information to this section of the page.
--Javierbaires1 21:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)