lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Walter Q. Gresham

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Walter Quintin Gresham was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:GRESHAM, Walter Q-Treasury (BEP engraved portrait).jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 20, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-12-20. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 21:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Saab 9-2

message: :"No move of this sort is expected from arch-rival manufacturer Mitsubishi, as its boy racer cars are not likely to garner the attention of friendly manufacturers."
I removed the above from the article, as I felt it was rather non-information; feel free to disagree and restore it. Out of interest, why is this article not at Saab 9-2X? - IMSoP 00:04, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: I think the content of this page can easily be explained in the Saab 9-2X article, especially because almost nothing is known about this vehicle and it seems more like a pipe dream more than anything. This article isn't long enough to stand on its own with everything we know about the automobile.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bailmoney27 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: oppose - while I agree it's not a great article, but it has nothing to do with the rebadged Subaru. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 22:33, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

text: Oppose as the 9-2 and 9-2X are completely unrelated cars. The 9-2 is Saab designed concept, the 9-2X is a rebadged Subaru Impreza. Also, the 9-2X does not have an article of its own any more, it is just a subsection of the Impreza page and merging the two would be very messy IMO. OSX (talk • contributions) 22:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

text: Concept cars are still notable in their own right. If the new reinvented Saab produces a production model based on this concept, then surely the two can go together. Until such a car is released, I feel that a stand-alone page is the best solution. I am certain this page could be reliably sourced. OSX (talk • contributions) 05:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Shar Jackson

message: So, anyone care to justify speedy deletion, based on the criteria at Wikipedia:Candidates for speedy deletion? Otherwise, your best bet is to take this through VfD the normal way. --Michael Snow 00:12, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two inquiries, if I may:
#Both Kevin Federline and Shar Jackson's IMDb bios say Kaleb was born on July 20th, not July 21st. But since the same person may have entered the date on both bios, does anyone know what day the baby was really born on?
#Does anyone know who the father of Shar's two older children is? Randee15 00:15, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shar's children 

message: who is shar jackson??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.80.206.166 (talk • contribs) 
Please sign your posts using: ~~~~, thanks 68.89.130.241 22:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: who is shar jackson

message: RE: 
I removed the criminal records personal web page which has nothing to do with Jackson. 68.89.130.241 22:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed advertising personal web page

message: I'm removing this section of the page until it is made official by a record company.  Merely posting songs on a Myspace page does not constitute the release of a single.
"==Music==
"Shar released her first single ""Flaunt It" through her Myspace in "early April. A second single ""Captivated/Fantasizing" was later "added. These are taken from her "upcoming album, tentatively titledan "independent record label. ""Shar's Myspace Shar's Music "account
"
"==Singles==
"{| class="wikitable"
"!width="40"|Year
"!Song
"
"|-
"|align="center" rowspan=1|2007
"|Flaunt It
"|-
"|align="center" rowspan=1|2007
"|Captivated/Fantasizing
torq 02:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Music Section

message: was this removed for a reason? Sacredhands 19:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: shar jackson photo

message: I cannot see the name of her husband.
I see nothing about her daughter Cassie - though present everywhere in the medias.
Wikipedia, usually talkative, even excessively about unexpected details, is here very dry. Too few. Balance required.
Magnon86 (talk) 12:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Husband ? Children ?
Talk:Valencian dialect

message: this language does not exists, it is catalan, so it cant have a name under "language". Even a court ruled that Valencian is not a language! -Pedro 00:49, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: ¿donde se convierte un rio en mar?¿cuando se convirtio el latin en catalan? A veces vemos el momento y nos olvidamos del flujo.... w3djwr(15/9/2004)
: Please speak english, we are on the english side of Wikipedia. One must be completely blind to not realize that Catalan and Valencian are the same language, like the Spanish spoken in Spain and the one spoken in Argentina are. If we were to go back in history what would we say, that English and German are the same language? That Catalan and French are? We must observe what exists now, not what existed time ago. --xDCDx 17:46, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  lenguas
Talk:Rosegarden

message: Why not list all the programs it requires to run?--Manboobies (talk) 18:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dependencies?

message: The article should mention that due to the way that Rosegarden tries to be both a sequencing tool and a notation editor, it is not possible to handle flow control (e.g. repetitions or alternative sections per stanza) the way one would expect from an ordinary notation editor. I learned that the painful way, after having invested many hours in learning how to configure and use the program. If it was mentioned in the article, some novices might be saved that pain. --84.177.27.113 (talk) 14:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  flow control 

message: When cross-platform tools such as Qt are available, why build anything for Linux only?  Building something for Windows only is bigoted and dismissive.  Building for Linux only is all that plus braindead.  It seems to imply a desire for permanent obscurity.  Somebody is going to fork it and leave Rosegarden behind.CountMacula (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  schizophrenic design 

message: It's not hugely famous, but it has its coverage, e.g. (on a quick google) press  , academic  (a conference proceeding that got a few cites elsewhere)  (not a huge mention, but explicitly describes Rosegarden as "notable") ... it gets quite a lot of mention, though I can't find e.g. monographs on it - David Gerard (talk) 15:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional cites for notability
Talk:Power analysis

message: Why wouldn't it be simpler to have some sort of battery or capacitor inside the device, such that the the battery has a constant draw from the external power source and the CPU can have a variable draw on the battery? Shades97 (talk) 22:58, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preventing simple and differential power analysis attacks 

message: Based on my understanding of this technique, its the type of attack that either requires direct, physical, access to a device/system during the analysis or at some point before it begins.  Basically:  you need to be able to sit there with a motherboard on a table, with oscilloscope probes attached to traces on a circuit board.  Even if there are applications of this type of technique that do not require that type of physical access, if the details of the technique require that the analysis is passive (and therefore do not use/piggyback off the device/system's own communication within a network or to the internet).  This article should include at least a SENTENCE of general audience clarification.  I bring this up because, in the minds of even moderately informed people, its not immediately clear how this type of attack/analysis fits into the spectrum of information security.  This is not the type of technique that can be carried out without resources, time, and direct access.  Its probably more commonly applied in "forensic" analysis/attacks, where an attacker physically possesses a device and has the capability of disassembling it to some degree without concern for being discovered.  Examples MIGHT include industrial/corporate espionage/reverse engineering, academic information security research, or forensic analysis for purposes of litigation in light of security failures.  There are, undoubtedly, other situations where this type of analysis has application.  However, its useful to be able to create a mental image of what this type of attack/analysis involves.  Again:  imagine a piece of computer hardware (eg:  set top box, rack mounted/server style enclosure, industrial-style metal enclosure, etc.) that has been opened up so that the motherboard is visible, and a few people are standing over it with a computer and specialized electronic signal analysis equipment (eg an oscilloscope) is sitting there with wires attached directly to the circuit board in areas that surround various chips on the board.  This is far different from, for example, someone surreptitiously attaching a USB memory stick containing malware to a particular server in a server room, attaching a fake keylogger-containing VGA cable to a KVM switch in a sever room, etc.  Its also different from the type of analysis that goes into other forms of potential hardware obfuscation, such as grinding down a microprocessor in a clean room or analyzing it with a SQUID/STM/AFM.50.150.93.206 (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Audience Clarification - Practical Details
Talk:Carl Spaatz

message: I wrote everything I posted myself; nothing was copied from an encylopedia or other source. Judging from some of the edits that were made, there is apparently some confusion about who was commanding the 8th and 15th Air Forces and when. Spaatz was the commander of both of these units at one point. He would later be promoted and be placed in charge of all strategic bombing units in Europe, which included the two air forces he had previously commanded. So I wrote "Spaatz directed ... the Eighth Air Force, [which was] now commanded by General Jimmy Doolittle ... and the Fifteenth Air Force, [which was] now commanded by General Nathan Twining". Saying Doolittle and Twining "later commanded" these units is incorrect; they were Spaatz' subordinates at that time. But I also realize that my original wording could be misinterpreted as saying Doolittle and Twining are still in command of these units now, which is of course untrue. I've amended it to be more precise. MK 02:18, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of Americans pronounce the short o the same way Australians and British do -- not just in Boston, but even in parts of the Midwest. Bostoner (talk) 02:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Either way, we should go with what any american dictionary says is the most prevalent pronunciation which makes the comparison in the text valid. What isn't mentioned is even with the extra "A", his name continues to be butchered even within the USAF. I've heard it pronounced at least 4 different ways... Ckruschke (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Waterboarding

message: I just spent a good portion of my evening rewriting the lede, which was seven paragraphs long and featured a confusing chronology, a factual inaccuracy, excessive detail, a challenged assertion that had been tagged since June 2015, and a near-complete focus on the 21st century U.S. debate over waterboarding. The lede is dramatically improved, but could still use more work.Editors have generated pages' worth of archived talk page debates and discussions about this >15-year-old article. It's disappointing that no one had expended an equivalent amount of time and effort to write a coherent lede. SunCrow (talk) 08:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Lede

message: Please delete this instance of the word "the": "and said that the its use could yield unreliable information" 81.100.37.20 (talk) 11:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done – Thjarkur (talk) 11:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 December 2020 

message: "Dry drowning" is a discredited term and should not be used in this page. Its wiki article says this when you click on it. I apologize if I'm writing this post incorrectly- I made this account recently. Thank you! Treepersonified (talk) 10:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same. One of the articles is clearly wrong. 2800:300:6291:7F50:0:0:0:2 (talk) 07:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dry drowning" should be edited out 

message: If you read the sources quoted in footnote 119 and 120 it states that the supervising soldier was courtmartialled. But the article describes 2 US soldiers involved as shown on the picture of the event as well. I found that confusing so I propose to add the word “supervising” to “soldier”, at the place where it reads that he was punished. 2A02:A467:9E7C:1:9DF5:A18C:C999:F444 (talk) 13:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit needed
Talk:Taylor Hanson

message: *rolleyes*
Do NOT post information like that.
This article needs a source for "best selling independent record", since I'm pretty sure that title is held by The Offspring's Smash.
Philosopher Torin 07:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says first that he was born in Jenks, then later that he was born in Tulsa. Which is it?Marzolian (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace?
Talk:Thrips

message: I removed the section on how thrips were related to other insects, and this needs to be rewritten. I will hopefully get round to it, but thought quick explanations are in order as to why I removed what was already here. The article as written presented a sister relationship between Thysanoptera and Phthiraptera + Liposcelididae, but the article cited as support for this does not. This topology is shown in Figure 3, but this is dismissed in the same paper: "the grouping of Thysanoptera with Phthiraptera, and Sternorrhyncha with Thysanoptera, Liposcelididae and Phthiraptera has no support from morphological data nor nuclear gene sequences, and therefore is most likely phylogenetic artifacts."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaficek (talk • contribs) 20:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship of thrips and other insects
Talk:Neon Genesis Evangelion: Girlfriend of Steel

message: I took my time to addapt this article to a more addequate way. The infomation on it looked good, but the way it was it couldn't suit an encyclopedia. I added Wiki links, the "History" section, the spoiler message and hid a small comment added by the original author (144.138.152.111) from the page's body. I added a different spoiler message (different from the one generally used) because the article literally spoils the whole game, which means we need something stronger to warn the readers. – Mackeriv 03:48, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Adapt

message: i was thinking the name should change to Iron maiden. seems off to call it girlfriend of steel and then say it's officially known as iron maiden. i did a Google check and it seems that "neon genesis evangelion Iron Maiden" had 143,000 results while "neon genesis evangelion Girlfriend of Steel" had 24,400 results. so i think it should be safe to change the name. also considering iron maiden 2nd is in the title of the sequel, I'm guessing that one is obviously more commonly known as iron maiden 2nd. so a Google check up wont be necessary but i guess it wouldn't hurt to be safe.Bread Ninja (talk) 08:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing the title
Talk:List of Federalist Papers

message: The articles #18,19,20 seem to be written not by Madison alone, but by "James Madison, with Alexander Hamilton" (see http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa18.htm ). I think this should be mentioned. Phelixxx 12:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles written jointly by Madison and Hamilton; Authorship of article #58

message: For a December 2004 deletion debate ovre this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Federalist Papers
----
from VfD:
This seems like just a TOC of the Federalist Papers. All of this information is already at http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa00.htm, which is linked to from our article Federalist Papers. Since this is basically a (partial) source document, why put it inside the Wikipedia? -- Jmabel 06:06, Jun 10, 2004 (UTC)
*Hmm... The page was just created and may be a precursor to an article on each Paper.  Let's wait and see if it becomes more than a link to source material.  Tentative keep.  SWAdair | Talk  08:34, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion bout deletion

message: Might it be good to have a sentence explaining that the coloring corresponds to the authors? JoshuaZ 20:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coloring
Talk:Ingalls Shipbuilding

message: Seems to me that ships that were begun under an independent Ingalls should be attributed to them, that ships begun under Litton should be attributed to "Litton Ingalls," and anything since the NG buyout should be to NGSS. Anyone in disagreement? Perhaps I should start compiling a list of Ingalls/Litton/NGSS ships and sort them out in this manner. -Joseph 03:04, 2004 Aug 20 (UTC)
I have a minor disagreement. I would separate out Ingalls era one era. - and maybe divide into 2 sub-catagories- World War II, and first half of cold war Era. Then I think the Litton, NGSS and HHI era's can remain one catagory. As these last era, with the change there was not a major change in what they were building, or in building methods, simply change in name /ownership. Plus the listing is far from complete, but does does cover major ships of the Litton/ NGSS/ HHI era's. 
24.245.105.165 (talk) 17:12, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Takeover 

message: When was laha1 ship made 2600:1700:2DD0:8E20:4D3:F676:7532:2881 (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lha1
Talk:Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution

message: why would we have to vote for a vice president. When the vice president comes with the president in office. Not only that,but the elected president can fire and hire who ever he want for Vice president. Regardless of who we vote for. Garch73 (talk) 19:32, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vice president  

message: The reason are elections presses is not only wrong but its broken. Is people who would make a better president, usually lost momentum. Or never got enough vots to be on the ballot. Leaving us poor choices for the United States CITIZENS ( Not illegal's) to voot for. If people dont want Trump as president. Then get rid of the ballot all together. Anyone should be abbel to run for president. Regardless of a ballot. The people of the U.S. should be able to vote for not only anyone, but have WAY more choices to choose from. End the ballot. Its causing lack of choices and leaves us 3 or less people who shouldn't be elected or in office. Garch73 (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ballot
Talk:Greek Americans

message: Most Greek Americans are confusing Eastern Orthodoxy with Greece. Even mainland Greeks are metaphysically narrow-minded, but statistically not as absolute as Greek Americans.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8762:D500:A10A:46B7:5026:A29A (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Greek Americans are confusing Eastern Orthodoxy with Greece
Talk:Fastway (bus rapid transit)

message: There are major factual errors in the article.
E.g. the results of the enquiry were not that.  here is the actual published enquiry:
http://www.maidenbower.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4933&highlight=fastway
and a lot of important, well sourced info that exists in the history of the article was stripped out and timetables and other junk added.
People accused me of POV editing so I promised not to edit this article, well, if no-one else is prepared to fix the errors then I will.
I think the tags must stay at the top until the stuff that was taken out is put back in.  This article looks the like the Fastway promotional site right now.
akaDruid 14:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual errors 

message: I've been trying to clean up this page, but it has such a lack of citation and the existing citation is sometimes misrepresented or missing altogether from their old servers. Also, there are a lot of quotes where references should be. If someone would help me cleaning this up it would be helpful! I think I've removed a lot of the remaining POV.. placing this under Citation Needed DarkshineDF (talk) 19:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:DuPont (1802–2017)

message: It is now being used in the manufacture of various antipsychotic neuroleptic drugs. These drugs are being given to people to disrupt their behavior so they can not function normally. Phenothiazine exposure causes explosive violence in individuals in many cases. Ironically these drugs are being given as "mood stabalizers" but actually increase the violent behavior. Many people exposed to the nerve agent of phenothiazine are being given more phenothiazine in the form of phenothiazine dirivative antipsychotic neuroleptic drugs. This is really insane. One must wonder if this is being done deliberately as part of a big corporate conspiracy to protect the interests of the corporations. Many people who are wistle blowers are targeted by the psychiatric establishment for treatment. If you enter a hospital emergency room and have a conversation with a doctor about controversial issues you may find yourself forcable admitted into their psychiatric unit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr CareBear (talk • contribs) 13:53, 7 June 2007‎ (UTC)
: Dr CareBear was banned from Wikipedia in 2011 for adding drivel like this to multiple articles and other disruptive behavior including sock puppetry.  Sandcherry (talk) 01:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1935 was the year that DuPont Introduced Phenothiazine as an Insecticide. 

message: I understand that is a "High Quality" article but there are sections like "Establishment: 1802" and "Automotive Investments: 1914" which cite NO reference to any information at all. Is this negligible? and why? JonathanX0X0 (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections Without References  

message: The following sentence was removed "Remarkably, these connections continued even after Germany declared war on the United States in 1941."  The basis for removal is no other source could be found other than a new claim by a student pursuing a doctorate.  Claims as serious as this one should have at least one primary source cited.  Also, the word "connections" is not specific so the relationship between Dupont and Nazi Germany after 1941, if any, is left to the reader's imagination.  Sandcherry (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dupont in WWII