lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Papilio demodocus

message: It looks like this page is a copyright violation from http://www.museums.org.za/bio/butterflies/papilio_demodocus.htm.  I'm going to try to rewrite this page later today to remove the copyrighted information.  --Wayne Miller 16:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I think it's done.  --Wayne Miller 20:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: What's the difference between Papilio demoleus and Papilio demodocus, they seem to have the same images in the each article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.219.42 (talk) 03:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They are closely related species in a clade group. I agree that the distinctions should be included in the articles, or a separate article should describe the group and its distinctions, but I am no Lepidopterist and would prefer some other sucker to volunteer just now. JonRichfield (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the difference?

message: I have added the mating systems section as part of a class assignment for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_Program:Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Behavioral_Ecology_(Fall_2013).  My research is in reference to five distinct sources that provided information on the species, and on butterflies in general. Morganclem  —Preceding undated comment added 04:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition of "Mating Systems"

message: The photograph of the larva at Stratford Butterfly Farm doesn't look to me much like Papilio demodocus. Could some authoritative practitioner please confirm its ID with suitable citation? If no one does so (or beat me to it), I'll replace it with a less astonishing photo when and if I remember. JonRichfield (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Are you sure???
Talk:Salsoul Records

message: I found less than two paragraphs here and left an incredible (though informative) mess.  If I try to edit I fear I will become too immersed yet again, so I shamefully leave that task to others.  I admit to some slight POV slips and fully expect to be edited merilessly.  Thanks to all who contribute.--Tednor 16:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pope Theodosius I of Alexandria

message: This article is about a pope of Alexandria who lived in the sixth century, but mentions him being exiled by the emperor Vespasian. This emperor lived about 500 years earlier than pope Theodosius. The emperors during this time were Justinian (527-565) and Justin II (565-578). So if pope Theodosius was exiled, it must have been on the orders of one of these emperors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.229.121.128 (talk) 10:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lone Star (band)

message: I loved those albums and will replace the vinyl with CDs soon. BTW I recall a BBC Radio 1 rock doc years ago which mentioned the short career of LS. Apparently they were off to the States and imbibed too much on the plane. Arriving at an important press conference in this state likely destroyed their chances and they had to return. I think there is probably supportive info in the first edition of the NME Book of Rock which I have somewhere.
81.86.144.210 08:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rad Doc
Talk:Timothy IV of Alexandria

message: According to this, which I quote here verbatim:
There's something wrong with this dates. Perhaps Timothy was elected before, during John's reign and was disputing the throne with him and Dioscorus II? The same problem also occurs with Dioscorus II.
José Luiz  disc 01:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates - something wrong 

message: The article states:
:He is counted as Timothy IV by the Eastern Orthodox Church, which acknowledges Timothy Salophakiolos as Timothy III, but as Timothy III by the Copts who reject Salophakiolos.
From an anonymous commenter in the text: "If this is correct, the Greek Orthodox Church must recognize Timothy II Aelurus as Patriarch. It is unclear why and when they should have done this. If they haven't recognized him, this Timothy here is number III for both parties. Someone in the know should clarify this." AxelBoldt (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering issue
Talk:Pope Dioscorus II of Alexandria

message: The sources give conflicting dates to the beginning and end of Dioscorus' reign. While the greeks do agree with the dates given in the article, the Coptic website gives 511 AD as the "Departure date" of Dioscorus. 
José Luiz  disc 01:17, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates - something wrong
Talk:Simian foamy virus

message: >There is nothing in here as to how serious an infection is to people.
It is not known to be fatal to any primate, including humans, to my knowledge Pagelm (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fatality? 

message: Without any citations to back the article's statements up, it seems more likely to me that the author of the tie-in text is confused by 3 letter acronyms for viruses. SIV has been shown to be taxonomically related to HIV (such that there have been at LEAST 2 incidences of zoonotic transfer).  I'm not aware of a link between SFV and HIV - certainly it has a very different mode of action. Pagelm (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SFV relation to HIV
Category talk:Church buildings

message: Carlaudes recent edits seem to be expanding this category from buildings used as churches to include specific congregations. Has this expansion been discussed and agreed to?--Editor2020 (talk) 03:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? See his current Cfd Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_October_17#Category:Churches Johnbod (talk) 10:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Hatnote description altered to reflect scope - buildings. Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding the category?
Talk:Timothy II of Alexandria

message: He is not a chalcedonian for sure. So I'm removing unnecessary boxes. If there objections, explain why. ~ Troy 03:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was not described as such. But there are two layers here: one the leadership of the Copts/miaphysites and the other the Patriarch commonly recognized and serving in Alexandria's main church. He was the former all the way but the latter only on two separate occasions. It makes sense to show both. Str1977 (talk) 17:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chalcedonian Patriarch
Talk:Kris Kringle

message: i've lived in germany for 40 years and never came across this term. it's either "christkind" in proper german, christkindl, krischkind, krischkinnl or krischkindl in southern dialects. this page is nonsense and should be deleted!Sundar1 16:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a term used for Santa Clause in the US, as explained in the article. The article also explains how the term is a corruption of the real christkind figure celebrated in Germany. Many Christmas traditions in the US are translated (sometimes sloppily) from the German. Tafinucane 21:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

text: That's poor etymological work. Just because a word is common in a language doesn't mean that it's a loan word from to any other language. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: kris kringle???
Talk:Pope Achillas of Alexandria

message: The statement "Achillas later became involved with the Arian Controversy, as an ally of Arius." is false and unsourced.  It is possible that Achillas reinstated Arius as deacon after troubles with previous bishop Peter, or even that he ordained Arius into the priesthood (though Alexander also could have done this).  These early issues between Peter and Arius had to do with the Meletian schism; it is my understanding that Arius had taken the side of the Meletians, but was then reconciled to the Alexandrian church.  But to say that he Achillas "became involved in the Arian Controversy" which did not even really have its beginning until the episcopate of Alexander, who succeeded Achillas after his death, makes no sense.  I am going to remove it unless someone can defend it.Ocyril (talk) 19:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate
Talk:Pope Theonas of Alexandria

message: Is this the same Theonas as mentioned in the Roman Martyrology, Aug 23?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman Martyrology 

message: I'm afraid that this article is written in a particularly nauseating way. This website is meant to be an unbiased encyclopaedia, not an ecclesiastical textbook. - Blakus632 (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: The linked Sabellius was living around 210/220 at the time of the Roman bishop Callixtus, so several decades earlier than Theonas. Either this is about a different Sabellius or the chronology is wrong. --Proofreader (talk) 21:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sabellius
Talk:Renault R25

message: I remember a quite humorous part at the end of the Top Gear episode mentioned in the article where the R25 played "God Save the Queen". I would've mentioned this in the article, but I was wondering if it really deserves it. --Zero TalkContribs 23:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renault R25 playing "God Save the Queen"
Talk:Pope Agrippinus of Alexandria

message: There is somethign very wrong with the content of this article. It seems to be speaking of an Agrippinus that is not the one titled in the article. The Agrippinus in the large paragraph is connected with Carthage, whereas the one titled was the bishop of Alexandria. Secondly, it appears to suggest that this Agrippinus convoked a synod in Carthage in 215, whereas the dating of the Alexandrian bishop shows that he was already 40 years dead. Does anybody know what is going on here? Deusveritasest (talk) 21:49, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something wrong
Talk:Hobo's Lullaby (album)

message: I linked the cover to this article and updated the image page for fair use here.
Kresock (talk) 18:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album image 

message: The "Personnel" section implies by omission that the album has no musicians other than Guthrie, which ain't so; somebody had to provide the violin and the female backing vocals.  The sleeve says
: People who contributed to this album: Hoyt Axton, Max Bennett, Byron Berline, Roger Bush, William Cole, Ry Cooder, John Carviotto, Nick DeCaro, Jim Dickinson, Doug Dillard, Chris Ethridge, Vanetta Fields, Wilton Felder, Ann Goodman, Gib Guilbeau, Arlo Guthrie, Richie Hayward, Jim Keltner, Clydie King, Daniel Labbatte, William Lee, Judy Maizel, Thad Maxwell, Gene Merlino, Arnie Moore, Larry Nicholson, Spooner Oldham, John Pilla, Thurl Ravenscroft, Fritz Richmond, Linda Ronstadt, Jessica Smith, Clarence White
though alas there's no indication of how they contributed. —Tamfang (talk) 04:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  credits
Talk:Masa Saito

message: There is a mention of The Assasins belt stripping, but no mention of who the Assasins were or if he was part of them or agains them.  LessThanClippers (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Assassins

message: Some gimmick info would be nice, so would his status as a heel or a face.  I think he was mainly a heel, correct?LessThanClippers (talk) 01:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gimmicks and Heel vs. Face

message: Where did you get this info from? I've seen NJPW matches on EuroSport from 04-05ish and Masa Saito appears now and again. MPJ-DK (talk) 15:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retired in 99? 
Talk:Panyathai

message: Are there any restrictions as to how people can register? Is it the same as Wikipedia, where anyone, without signing in, can contribute? If people have to register, do they have to use their given names and provide ID? — WiseKwai 17:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone can register with a vaild email address. Registration is required for posting comments and such --Jutiphan 17:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since December 3, it opened the Wiki section using MediaWiki as same as Wikipedia.--Manop - TH 00:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Registration
Talk:Joe Glazer

message: I noticed that most of the "External Links" were really References.  Each reference was a link, rather than a full reference.  The problem is that many newspapers and online news sources put articles behind pay-to-view firewalls and archive them after just a few weeks.  Readers who access this Wikipedia article months or years in the future won't be able to view these articles.  So it's more appropriate to put the entire citation (including author, title, publication and date), than a link.  That way, when good links go bad (couldn't help the pun, sorry!), readers still can access the source. - 1965Tim 01:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are the edits I've done regarding Glazer's work for the U.S. Government in line with what you have in mind here?David in DC 20:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Vic Pratt

message: He is a writer. artist and film critic so he got notability (hes not a friend of mine i just admire his work)
He drew a comic with Robert Crumb and it appears in a Crumb book
The British small press comics scene is notable enough.
Lee Kennedy has a page. people are interested in the small press —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vizpooter (talk • contribs) 
:Hello. I've declined to speedy delete this page now because it was tagged for deletion the same minute it was created, but I suggest you quickly add a valid claim to notability under WP:BIO to the article, or it may be tagged again, and deleted. Sandstein 21:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Laugh, Clown, Laugh

message: "Stills exist that show Chaney in his clown make-up."
Why is it worth noting that stills exist of a film's star? That's the normal situation. Apparently the writer believes this is a lost film. 2A02:AA1:161A:644:CC1:9D4A:8AB:8BB5 (talk) 20:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "stills exist..."
Talk:Royal Navy (disambiguation)

message: Whilst not all of the articles listed here are named Royal Navy, would it not be worthwhile having them link back to this page with the standard (or edited version of) the disambig text on all of them? JonEastham 17:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, especially since since the Royal Navy → Royal Navy (UK) battle seams to rear its ugly head every couple of months. --Kralizec! (talk) 03:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to all
Talk:Global Justice Now

message: The first paragraph reads like an excerpt from the organization's own promotional materials. In particular, phrasing like "However, fundamental change is not achieved easily - running as it does contrary to the perceived national interests of the developed world" doesn't sound very NPOV to me. Is this really OK?
Kai MacTane 17:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Controversy section seems to constitute the actual controversy: I couldn't find any reference to third parties discussing this "controversy". In addition the response by Global Justice Now in the second paragraph appears to constitute their actual response! as no similar notice can be found on their website for example. (The user who made this change in fact describes it as the organisation's "response" in their Edit summary.) The entire section seems to be a kind of "original research": a manufactured controversy (though the facts may be true) and an unsourced response to said controversy. I've added a few Citation needed tags for now but suggest this entire section could be reduced to a few lines or, failing any third party references, the entire section could be deleted.
Bob.Churchill (talk) 12:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversial controversy section
Talk:Group-Office

message: * Tutorial: Setting up Group Office
* Group Office 2.02 approved  translation, 11.03.2004, "PHP Magazine"
* Gentoo portage entry, since November 2004.
** The Gentoo ebuild is mostly maintained by "Martin Holzer". . Searching for "Martin Holzer" groupoffice" -gentoo and "Martin Holzer" "group office" -gentoo indicates his involvement in the project is limited to maintaining the port. John Vandenberg 23:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External sources of dubious usefulness 
Talk:Andrey Lugovoy

message: in 2001..... arrested by which police force  / where?   relevent to stipulate I think - accurate and detailed information please  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.75.184 (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Does someone have any information about where Lugovoi is now?  I feel that's pretty important to the article.  Presumably he's in Russia, and not in police custody?  Nicolasdz 14:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You will soon find him sitting in the Russian Parliament. If you are planning on serving justice on him, then please leave me out of it. 82.46.233.8 16:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, he's now LDPR Duma deputy. --HanzoHattori (talk) 08:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

text: The bit about polonium-210 is sourced and isn't contradicted by what you said. The actual reference says he was treated for suspected radiation poisoning but declined to say if it was polonium-210. Unfortunately our article only mentioned the bit about not saying if he had been contaminated with polonium-210 which is a little confusing and potentially misleading, so I have clarified it based on the source. If you have more WP:RS which will shed light on this matter, even Russian ones, you're welcome to present them. Nil Einne (talk) 16:39, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Whereabouts?

message: He submitted to a lie detector and aced it. Why is this not mentioned?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWaXKUop5-U
74.58.252.102 (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  lie detector 
Talk:Darmstadt Artists' Colony

message: There is much more information on this at de:Darmstädter Künstlerkolonie, can someone who knows German and English please translate some content over? HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 17:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kilmersdon

message: Talk: Kilmersdon
I have made some changes the page which has been updated not too long ago after I Started it - an excellent job whoever did it!
However... there were a couple of anomalies I changed and I thought I'd write why ! Firstly Lord Hilton's son lives in Ammerdown house - the current Lord Hilton lives in Hemmington - nearby. Secondly Kilmersdon is fairly distinctive in that it does not, unlike many of the other villages and towns around, have any observable evidence of the mining that took place - probably because the minehead was in Haydon?
I have been unable to check or prove that the church, St Peter & St Paul is Grade I listed - but I am extremely surprised that it is ? Is this definitely the case?  I should add, since I was the one who mentioned the connection with Lutyens that it ought to have a reference, and I don't have one.  When I'm next in the area I will have a root around for Lord Hilton's book on the village which should be able to provide a definitive answer on the above and perhaps some more detail.
Tedfowler 18:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Ted, Thanks for the comments and changes. I did some of the edits including the info box, although others have as well. I can confirm the grade 1 listed status of St Peter & St Paul if you click on the ref (No 2) attached to it - you will get to Images of England which English Heritages site see Church of St. Peter and St. Paul . If you register with that site you can check almost all listed buildings in England (except a few who have got their status in the last few years).— Rod talk 18:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wanted to add the meaning of Kilmersdon but the reference I found actually contradicted what I thought! I have added the meaning as found in the reference however I previously believed the name kilmersdon was named after a tribe 'Killa' who had a settlement 'don' by a lake 'mere', put together Killameredon. Obviously I have no evidence for this, only what I have heard. If anyone knows anything about this please add it to the discussion. Achilles85 21:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Kilmersdon 
Talk:Godzilla's/Eatin' Dust

message: Actually the earlier track listing was the correct one. At least according to their web site fu-manchu.com, the track listing should be:
1. Godzilla
2. Module Overload
3. Living Legend
4. Eatin Dust
5. Shift Kicker
6. Orbiter
7. Mongoose
8. Pigeon Toe
__
actually that's the track listing of the release »(godzilla's) eatin' dust«. it's the tracks of the two 10" eps »godzilla« and »eatin' dust« released on one LP, also on man's ruin records. i don't know about the cd releases though.
#mtn
_  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.246.191.15 (talk) 23:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eugene Kelly (Irish republican)

message: I am going to rename this article to Eugene Kelly (Irish republican) in line with the naming of other IRA Volunteers and in order to stop confusion with other types of republicans. Would anyone object? Vintagekits 18:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will give it another week before I change it. Vintagekits 16:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection. Go for it. Just make sure you do it the correct way (ie NOT a cut and paste job) to ensure the page history is retained.GiollaUidir 17:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was going to use the (#REDIRECT Insert page name) method - is this correct? Vintagekits 17:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If its not maybe we should get [user:Weggie] invloved as he know exactly what to do and performed a similar procedure this weekend on another page. Vintagekits 17:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

text:  Press MOVE from the tabs above and put the the new name in with a reason. It will automatically create redirects for you. The only other thing is to give any wikilinks under the current (to be old) name i.e. Eugene Kelly (PIRA Member) to make sure everything looks OK Weggie 20:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming
Talk:Ghosts of Albion

message: I removed the link to ghostsofalbion.net because it is no longer valid.
Cboyechko (talk) 19:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links
Talk:Crossair Flight 3597

message: The article mentions some survivors, but not WHY/HOW these survived. It would be interesting to add this information to the main article, including a mor precise explanation how the plane crashed exactly (given the fact that the pilots died as well). 2A02:8388:1641:8380:419C:5734:36D4:E382 (talk) 17:32, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The official report makes no mention of why and how they survived so it may not be possible to find out. MilborneOne (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivors