lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:I Put a Spell on You

message: Are lyrics encyclopedic? Do u believe  articles with just lyrics, and no additional information about the band/musician, should be included in the encyclopedia? I'm going to put a cleanup notice on this because I think that if it is retained, it should include more information than just lyrics (such as musician information, background, brief history, etc.). – Mipadi July 1, 2005 14:55 (UTC)
:Articles with lyrics only may not possess an encyclopedic value, but it could be valuable to include excerpts of lyrics or the entirety of the lyrics with contextual information about their meaning or with links to the cultural phenomena that the lyrics are referring to. WIthin that realm, the inclusion of lyrics would have meaning. Irishexpatriate (talk) 14:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics

message: Alan Price recorded "I Put a Spell On You" after he left the group.  The Animals also recorded it.  While neither version was a major hit, the Alan Price version was released as a single, while the Animals' version was not.  ----CinRit, July 2007
--
note: the youtube video linked to in the sidebar does not seem valid. I would have put one in, but I'm not sure which one was intended. --Kimslawson  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimslawson (talk • contribs) 22:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alan Price 

message: The Shane MacGowan and Sonique versions as separate sections seem out of proportion in regards to their importance among the many more notable covers listed.  22yearswothanks (talk) 20:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  other covers 

message: Proposal to only include the info boxes for the major versions of the song as defined as either being the original that influenced other artists or that made the charts. Move the info for the others to the list of covers and any addition trivia to those artists pages. Therefore details would be left for Screaming Jay Hawkins's original and the Creedence Clearwater Revivial version for charting at #58. The Shane MacGowan listing with Johnny Depp as a musician would therefore be moved to the Shane MacGowan page. Further cleanup could be to reduce the number of covers. Its impractical to list every cover for a song on Wikipedia since some more well known songs have thousands of covers.22yearswothanks (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: The Annie Lennox rendition of the song was used during the closing credits of this episode.  Just adding here in case a proper secondary source might be found supporting an 'in pop culture' passage. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 5 of [[Gen V]]
Wikipedia talk:HK wikipedians' notice board/HKCOTW

message: As far as I can see, all Hong Kong FAs bypassed HKCOTW ^_^ Deryck C. 15:47, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  /featured 

message: Is the COTW inactive? --Terence Ong |Talk 16:07, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say it's a bit seasonal. :-) — Instantnood 16:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inactive?
Talk:Holbrook, New South Wales

message: Holbrook is no longer a shire - it was amalgamated into Greater Hume. Page needs updating I think Albatross2147 1 July 2005 15:15 (UTC)
:See new article on Greater Hume Shire Council--AYArktos 00:10, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Holbrook Bypass will be open in 2012 (As well as Woomargama and Tarcutta). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.168.57.62 (talk) 06:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holbrook Bypass 
Talk:Carrion crawler

message: I'm thinking this is a fictional creature, possibly from World of Warcraft. If so, a note of that should be made on this page. – Mipadi July 1, 2005 15:19 (UTC)
: No, it's from D&D. WoW may have, um, borrowed it, but it's certainly not from there. MasterGrazzt 06:50, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this?

message: This article has at least two separate contradictions.
*Is it a scavenger (eats carrion) or a predator ("it uses its tentacles to stun its prey") ?
*The text says there are a pair of paralysing tentacles on the sides of its head, but the picture does not represent them as a pair. Zargulon 08:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: I did have a good laugh over the current image.  I appreciate their are copyright problems with images from game material, but presumably we can do better than this...? --Legis (talk - contribs) 17:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL - I would like to think so. :) 204.153.84.10 (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh. I contributed this after the Beholder.jpg controversy. Thought it might get a laugh or two. Anyway, it took about 2 minutes in MS Paint, so feel free to replace with something not, you know, awful.  -- Gaius Octavius | Talk 15:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're such a trouble-maker. ;) 67.175.176.178 (talk) 05:04, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Rawr! It's been about a year since anyone's considered using another image. I don't know how to edit properly, so I'm just hoping to bring the page to the attention of a more competent editor who might have some better fan art.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.161.82 (talk) 21:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:HDB3

message: HDB3 is acronym of "High density bipolar of order 3 code" not "High density bipolar 3 ZEROS!" refer to G.703 standard page "43". --Pejman47 11:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  HDB3 acronym 

message: Maybe this notion don't belong here, but I think we need HDBn article. HDB3 is code from HDBn class. --Čikić Dragan (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HDBn
Talk:Pompon

message: Although it is not commonly known, in some regions of the United States Pompon is considered a sport separate from cheerleading.
: Since I see a Pom-pon as a thing and not activity, could you explain briefly what you mean? Is it a dance team -like activity, for instance? The word itself is a noun referring to a thing that is used, so I'm not sure what you mean by this.
:VigilancePrime 00:25, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pompon as a Sport 

message: The opinion about whether "pom-pom" is correct, or incorrect, is just that, an opinion.  Stating that "pom-pom" is wrong, is a point-of-view.  Opinions should not be stated as objective facts.  Also *both* opinions and facts, should have proper citations.  Also, please don't respond to this by citing something on this talk page, or my talk page, please put the required citaitons in the article itself.  I actually care very little about the use of "pom-pom" versus "pompon", and won't edit to make it fit my personal view (which favors "pom-pom" as being valid).  What concerns me more is the second-rate sourcing of the article.  Saying "...is seen in the majority of professional sources" is about the worst type of sourcing you can possible do.  The only thing worse than not providing a source (which I was personally guilty of in my past edits of this article) is claiming sources without citing sources.  The choking hazard is another thing, where we should make specific cited statements, or not say anything.  Obviously, kids can choke on strings, but if all we have to say is based on common knowledge, let's skip it. --Rob 11:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have cleaned up this article a bit, and have taken out some of the parts of the objectionable paragraph. I added a  tag to the statement that many sources use "Pom-pon". Will that suffice? NatusRoma 05:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's good for me.  --Rob 07:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  anti pom-pom POV
Talk:King Cotton

message: The article discusses the economic theory more than the slogan. Doesn't that mean we should we rename it to King Cotton theory or something like that? — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: keep.  the slogan is about the economic power of cotton, and the theory explains why so. Rjensen (talk) 04:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok then. Fair enough.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  06:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we rename this article? 

message: This article seems to cover a lot of the same ground as Cotton diplomacy. Would a merger be appropriate? Mobi Ditch (talk) 21:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Cotton diplomacy]]? 

message: Hello,
I would like to add a sentence in-between '...British public opinion', and 'Even if Britain did intervene...'. 
I would like to add a sentence that describes in short how Britain was against the idea of slavery, but seen as jealous of the economic progression in the States at the time, leading to increased tensions between the two (as written about by Matthew Karp in 'King Cotton, Emperor Slavery'). Any feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks.  Mperry34 (talk) 12:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks like a good edit and an extra piece of information on an interesting topic, just make sure that you're using an RS B1GMelman613 (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to add to 'British Position'
Talk:Pocono Organics CBD 325

message: This page states that the 2009 race here was the first NASCAR race to have double file restarts. What about the 2004 Budweiser Shootout race? They had a double file restart after the Caution where Jeremy Mayfield wrecked and they had to Red Flag it. (74.78.52.83 (talk) 08:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double File Restarts
Talk:Love (band)

message: Johnny Echols has given an update to Culture Sonar about his plans for 2019.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emnetinlurve (talk • contribs) 01:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnny Echols 2019 

message: I've taken the reference to 'first time a band had a logo' out of the text.  Unfortunately the previous wording ommitted the word *consistently* - which was a very important nuance in the original source article, which is just a blog post by a graphic designer and so probably doesn't particularly meet WP:SCHOLARSHIP. It's worth noting the well-known Beatles 'Drop T' logo seen on Ringo's drum kit since 1963 had been used for years before this and is *possibly* the best known band logo, but wasn't used as a logo for their studio albums.
Jpmaytum (talk) 16:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Band logo

message: It's the only mentioned review and it is very negative.  Other reviews call it a masterpiece!
https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/11429-forever-changes-collectors-edition/ Patfromhilo (talk) 19:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative review
Talk:Cimarron (novel)

message: Shouldn't this article be moved to Cimarron (Book)? This would be more consistent with other Wikipedia articles about books.  Besides, I think most people would be looking for an article about the land itself, not an article about a book about the land.  MusicTree3 (talk) 15:18, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chickpea

message: I had always assumed that the chick pea was so named due to its resemblance to the head of a chicken (juvenile hen). No mention or reference to this resemblance  ?
150.143.154.163 (talk) 12:23, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: I don't have full access to this  but it mentions health benefits and risks of chickpea consumption. Do you think it is a good source? It is published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. I agree there are not many reviews on this topic but I also found another review  in the Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The CRFSN article may be alright for nutrition information (abstract only though), but we already have adequate discussion under 'Nutrition' combined with the USDA nutrient tables. Imo, neither journal is suitable as MEDRS evidence. Zefr (talk) 00:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Health research

message: Note that, in the actual Republic of Armenia, in the province of Vayots Tsor, there grow two different varieties of wild chick peas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.79.229.80 (talk) 23:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wild chick pea 

message: I've tried on a number of occasions to inform myself about what seem to me to be two very different kinds of chickpea. On the one hand, there is a seed with four lobes, and a point at one end, that is NOT lens-shaped; on the other hand, there is a seed like a pea, with two lens-shaped halves (but flatter on one side).
It seems the latter specifically is known as "Bengal gram". I've been unable to determine conclusively whether the term "chana" refers to all kinds of chickpeas, or just the lens-shaped ones.
I used to believe that the lens-shaped ones were simply a life-stage of the same plant; but that seems to be false. I've just read some farming instructions for growing Bengal gram, and it says you should harvest once the plant has dried and turned brown. So Bengal gram is a mature seed.
How can I find out more about this?
MrDemeanour (talk) 19:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Varieties
Talk:Shardik

message: Is this a word? Google only turns up a variety of usernames. I have no idea what to replace it with. --Jamoche 18:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. --DocumentN (talk) 16:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  mythotic 

message: I have no time to add anything to this article right now, but Time has a review of Shardik that might be useful. Mr. Absurd (talk) 03:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good review 

message: Was Shardik ever made into a graphic novel or movie?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.59.229 (talk) 03:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic Novel or movie? 

message: I have removed as much as I could today of the unsourced material and excessive character descriptions -- so long that they were turned into full-blown sections of the article! -- also full of original research observations of the meaning behind the characters' actions, etc. There is not one single reference in the article to support any of the broad analytical statements made and in any case there is no need to describe every single aspect of a character, their entire arc, through the whole novel. That's not what a "Characters" section is for. For goodness sake, what is a "plot introduction"? An excuse to have more unsourced material, it seems. The article was a series of personal essays with a slightly wonky but passable plot summary. Even the section called "Places" was just three seemingly randomly selected regions of the novel. One of them -- Quiso -- is an island, not a nation in its own right. A whole lot about that, but Bekla isn't metioned, nor Ortelga, the two main locations of the novel, but oh, Quiso is, and Deelguy and another random place. Again, OR shows up saying one of the places is based on Persia. We should be grateful the author of the character essays seems to have got tired at this point and did not provide us with an in-depth gazetter of the novel. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 05:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research, original research and ... more original research
Talk:Eagle (automobile)

message: What is the Eagle brand in Forza Horizon? AmericanLeMans (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forza Horizon
Talk:A Western Harvest Field by Moonlight

message: ""Styrofoam Chicken (Quality Time)" - never ends!"
What? --Macarion 19:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor removed the notability tag saying: "How is this not notable? It's very notable." Reading the tags gives a clue: "...to establish its notability. The best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject." taken in concert with: "This article does not cite any references or sources."
Per WP:NALBUMS: "All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." (Again, note the lack of sources.) Additionally, this is an "unofficial release", according to the article: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia. Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable;" (emphasis added). - SummerPhD (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Seabadge

message: I'm redirecting Powderhorn & Seabadge here, per its AfD.  Emb021 suggested there was useful information in it to merge, but that there were also factual errors in that article as well.  I know nothing of the subject, so I'm not comfortable doing the merge myself.  The pre-redirect version of the article may be seen here. —Cryptic (talk) 10:12, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Powderhorn & Seabadge]] 

message: Looking at The Language of Scouting and the insignia Guide, the proper name for this article should be Seabadge.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  18:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:List of rulers of Monaco

message: People keep adding the image Portrait of a Young Fiancée attributed to Leonardo as if it were a portrait of Claudine.  It was used as a substitute for Claudine in an article on Monaco, but it has nothing to do with the Grimaldis and is probably a portrait of Bianca Sforza.  Please stop adding it here. -- Elphion (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The portrait is not of Claudine 

message: The very grainy photo of a painting given here as that of Charles I of Monaco cannot possibly be that of any person of that era, unless it isn't contemporary. The style is that of about 300 years later, which would be obvious from comparison with other portraiture of that time. Even if it were an attempt to depict a person of the 1350s executed circa 1650 or later, I doubt the subject would have been depicted in costume of the 17th century, as I think the habit of portraying historical figures anachronistically (for example, portraying biblical figures in medieval or Renaissance costume) had long since ended. If this is a portrait of anybody named Charles, it's more likely Charles II ... of England. It's anachronistic, out of place, and almost certainly wrong, so I'm removing it. If anybody can show how it's an accurate portrayal, feel free to restore it. MarkVolundNYC (talk) 06:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait of Charles I of Monaco? I doubt it 
Talk:Rocannon's World

message: Does the planet in this book have a name? I only ever read the introduction, to my undying shame. Atinoda 00:32, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tougher Than Leather

message: I was listening to this album in the UK in May/June 1988, so this September date is completely mistaken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.72.224.186 (talk) 18:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date???
Talk:Nuno Álvares Pereira

message: I am removing the honorific prefix "Blessed" that starts the lead, as per:
* Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Honorific prefixes
* Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Clerical names
* Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Western clergy)
Wikipedia doesn't use honorifics such as "Blessed", "His Holiness", "Her Majesty", or "Professor" in the lead. It's just to be discussed in the article proper. — Komusou talk @ 01:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed honorific
Talk:One, Two, Three

message: The "is this the end of Rico?" line is not Cagney, but Edward G. Robinson in Little Caesar. [This change has now been reflected on the main page.]
I would be interested to know how much of this film was shot on location, and where those locations are, as surely it is an interesting record of West and East Berlin of the time. Also, did Coca-Cola lend any support to the film? And what is the citation for MacNamara being a reference to Robert MacNamara? Could it just be a coincidence?Pubwebmaster 14:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the film was shot on the set, including the scenes at the "Brandenburg gate" and on the "Tempelhof airfield", which were rebuild at Bavaria Studios in Geiselgasteig near Munich. Car rides were shot on location in Western Berlin, as were the scene dealing in Eastern Berlin like the one at the "Grand Hotel Potemkin",  actually the ruin of the Anhalter Bahnhof in Berlin-Kreuzberg. Today the Coca-Cola plant is not in operation any more, the building however can be found at Hildburghauser Straße in Berlin-Lichterfelde.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.180.114.231 (talk) 11:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: http://www.unav.es/fcom/comunicacionysociedad/es/articulo.php?art_id=408
Filming History: Billy Wilder and the Cold War 
José-Vidal PELAZ LÓPEZ 
Communication & Society, 25(1), pp.113-136. 2012.  --Nbauman (talk) 04:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good source 
Talk:Sutta Piṭaka

message: The Tripitaka/Tipitaka article uses the Sanscrit spelling, but as of this page, the Pali spellings are used. Should these be kept consistent?  I'm not familiar with usage of the Sanscrit spellings for the Tipitaka, but if others are, perhaps they can update them. -- Jketola 1 July 2005 19:09 (UTC)
We should use Pali when we're talking specifically about the Pali Canon and Sanskrit when    we're combining material about different versions of the Scriptures. Peter jackson 10:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency: Sanscrit vs. Pali

message: * http://www.google.cn/search?hl=zh-CN&newwindow=1&q=Sutta+Pitaka+%E7%BB%8F%E8%97%8F+edu.tw+filetype%3Apdf&btnG=Google+%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&aq=f&oq=
--222.64.216.226 (talk) 12:58, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Chinese translation of the term is based on the following....
Talk:Fort Garry Brewing Company

message: The brewery's own website hosts a page called "Our Story" that seems to have inaccurate years for many events. Notably: Richard Hoeschen's passing was in 2002, not 2001 (I found the obit), and the brewery was resurrected in 1994, not 1999. It's weird but I don't think the brewery's own history page is reliable. Just a heads up for the next editor through these parts. --Ccyyrree (talk) 05:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The brewery's Our Story web page seems inaccurate.
Talk:The Forgotten Arm

message: ok, it is a concept album. so, why wretching the end of the story? just keep it secret! capi 22:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers!!

message: :Image:Aimee Mann The Forgotten arm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Aimee Mann The Forgotten arm.jpg
Talk:Fromental Halévy

message: This is correct, but he is very often called Jacques in the English-speaking countries, so it would be good if someone seeking Jacques were redirected here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.206.122.30 (talk) 00:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: Shall we add an infobox for this article?--Mishae (talk) 06:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 