lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Youppi!

message: The article says that a lot of people believe that Youppi! was inducted into the Hall of Fame.  First of all, 3 mascots (the San Diego Chicken, the Phillie Phanatic, and the Phoenix Suns Gorilla, Go) were inducted into the Mascot Hall of Fame in its inaugural class in 2005.  They are officially members of the Mascot Hall of Fame.  Youppi!, however, was not inducted into the Mascot Hall of Fame.  The costumes for Youppi!, the Phillie Phanatic, and the San Diego Chicken are on display in the Baseball Hall of Fame, but they are not members.  
Carter Somerville 18:19, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mascot Hall of Fame 

message: Didn't Jim Henson have something to do with the creation of Youppi? I think I read about this in the news once...
Youppi! was designed by Bonnie Erickson, formerly a designer for Jim Henson, and the designer of Miss Piggy, Statler & Waldorf and other Muppet characters  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.162.10.206 (talk) 19:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim Henson connection? 

message: Can anyone put a picture of Youppi up that isn't copyrighted, maybe from their own personal collection? Ikki the Fox Breeder 06:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: From where come this information ? - Khayman (contact) 13:30, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Tried to fix it - I read it initially like you did, that the mascot was called Yippee by French Canadians. Article was actually trying to say the Youppi meant Yippee, in French.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.226.218.130 (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yippee! or Hooray! in French ?
Talk:Perdita (moon)

message: So, it's "30x30x30km", but the radius is "15km ±3km" (and on the master list of Uranian satellites, diameter "30km ±6km")? On which hitherto undiscovered fourth and fifth dimensional axes does it measure 36km and 24km then? Can someone explain this mismatch for us? Also having the other measurements like volume etc seeming fairly certain doesn't really gel with its max potential radius being 50% larger than its min, which could mean 2.25:1 for surface area and 3.375:1 for volume... 209.93.141.17 (talk) 23:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  size weirdness
Talk:Lists of the world's busiest ports

message: This article's existence seems kind of pointless considering how the articles linked in "see also" cover everything this article does already. I think this page should just be a disambiguation page, and that's what I'll change it to for now. Feel free to discuss this issue MLGDatBoi1738 (talk) 20:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion or Nah

message: How should the list link to the articles about the actual ports, through the city names? Is the data direct from the 2003 list? This could get confusing if it keeps being updated with data from differently calculated sources. Tfine80 17:18, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not too sure what you mean by the first question. As for the second, the 2002 and 2003 data are directly sourced from references as indicated, so they should not change. 2004 figures were taken from press release sources and from the operator's websites, so they may be updated until AAPA comes up with the finalised list for that year.--Huaiwei 19:27, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Few questions 

message: The references are listes for 2002 and 2003 only. What are the references for the other years?--Hhielscher 09:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References of 2004 and 2005? 

message: Why does "Largest Port" redirect here? If I want to find out the largest port (by geographic size), I shouldn't be redirected to this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.251.1.105 (talk) 02:13, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Largest Port" redirect here? 

message: I'd like to move this page from World's busiest port to World's busiest ports (plural). While article titles are generally singular in form (eg, Horse not Horses) exceptions include the names of classes of objects, which is what we have here. I've consulted WP:MOVE and WP:RM and there seems to be a backlog, and since the move seems non-controversial I think I'll try to do it myself if I can work it out. I just thought it would be a good idea to leave this note here as a courtesy. nagualdesign 20:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Larry Sherry

message: anyone know any more info about larry sherry?--Alhutch 17:19, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Institutionalism

message: Hi,
These French articles refer to the same topic as the previous subject :
#French:fr:Institutionnalisme (stub & somewhat disambiguation)
#French:fr:Institutionnalisme américain (full content) about economics.
#French:fr:Institutionnalisme néolibéral translation of Neoliberalism (international relations) about diplomacy.
#French:fr:Nouvelle économie institutionnelle translation for New Institutionalism.
Could you propose new articles for the lacking interwiki links ?
Yours,
Holycharly 14:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: French articles

message: The disambiguation page could maybe a include a note about the topic of institutionalism and religion.  ADM (talk) 19:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: What is institutionalism 49.151.26.105 (talk) 00:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social sciences
Talk:Kirloskarwadi

message: Comment posted on Sept 25, 2005. 1.34 pm EST: Many people have been editing this page and the Wikipedia editors have marked this page for cleanup several times. This page was created by me (Sameer) and I plan to develop it on the guidelines of other similar pages related to a particular place. The layout I want to follow most closely is that of Lowell, Massachusetts page in Wikipedia. Anyone editing this page... please first visit the Lowell, Massachusetts page and then make changes accordingly.
:There's probably no real objection to following that layout, but no editor vcan make that decision for others; if other editors prefer a different layout, they're free to try it (and if there's a difference of opinion, it can be sorted out in discussion here.
:I'm not sure why the cleanup tag was removed, as the article still badly needs it.  It's still too much of a publicity piece for a company rather than an article on a town; the English also needs overhauling.  --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 21:52, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that no editor can make a decision about the format. But I do urge people to have a look at pages describing other towns and try to develop a format which is on those lines. I won't be removing the cleanup tag till the editors are satisfied. As far as the contents go, some information about the company is unavoidable since the town exists because of the company. I am not trying to make a publicity piece here but the history of the town requires the mention of the company. I will make an attempt not to put overtly "publicity" kind of info about the company and also try to avoid links about the company. -- Transmogrifier 17:35, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:RoboCop 3

message: Excuse me, but the "criticism" section is by all means not NPOV. - Sikon 17:33, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As of now I am removing all criticism for a complete lack of citation.  Criticism sections are really only for cited criticisms from large fan bases, industry professionals, or actual critics.--Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk|@ 23:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism Section NPOV problems 

message: What proof is their that Robocop 4 was to be titles Fight for the future? I have never heard of this, and am a fairly avid Robo fan. While I have heard about Robocop 4 being considered I have never read anywhere where this title is mentioned, and this is the first time I have ever hear the name at all.
:I'm wondering why this section is here at all.  Seems like when it becomes a more solid reality, it should be its own article, not an out-of-place section of this one. Dstumme (talk) 14:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: RoboCop 4 on IMDb 5.90.189.153 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robocop 4 

message: I have added in a new critical reception section, its sourced as well as I could find. Also picked up some random refs for other bits of the article. Looks like the plot has been ripped vebartim from another site, can't remember which. Anyone seen this film recently and feel like writing another plot summary? I don't think I could bring myself to sit through it again even for the sake of Wikipedia. Nait2k4 (talk) 03:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Reception

message: The first two movies articles had much longer, more detailed plot summaries. i feel that a few important things (eg: the recurring theme of the 4th prime directive) were missed. needs expansion, but i have only seen it once i didn't see all of it so im not realy the one to do it. XM8 Carbine (talk) 13:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:TVT Records

message: The "TVT hates NIN" part doesn't sound very professional and seems a bit unfounded as it is... Nbettencourt 17:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: unprofessional

message: This page sounds like a big 'ol piece of self-promotion from our friends at TVT. I suggest starting over with something slightly less breath-less.
**I'm deleting all the self-promotion until somebody writes an un-biased article. It was extremely sickening to read on Wikipedia. I'll try to add as much information as I can later.
:You are right. This article needs to be closely watched. The folks at TVT will get in this articcle and totally change everything around, making it self-promoting and unbiased.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.39.149.13 (talk) 07:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: self-promotional
Talk:Agarwood

message: I need help with my essential oil wikiproject please. Wikipedia:WikiProject Essential Oils Ilikeguys21 (talk) 13:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject 

message: For the sentence Agarwood’s use as a  medicinal product was also recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, which date back to approximately the ninth century, and in the Ayurvedic medicinal text the Susruta Samhita (dtd. 2nd - 6th century CE). the current (19 May 2018) text cites ; however, this is just a list of publications that does not mention the hadiths of Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, nor the Susruta Samhita. A number of epigraphic references indicate the use of Agaru or aloe wood in ancient India in the middle of the first millennium CE. However, one of the publications cited on that webpage was a pamphelet  where the following sentences occur on page 7 under "Use as medicine": Agarwood has been used for medicinal purposes for thousands of years, and continues to be used in Ayurvedic, Tibetan and traditional East Asian medicine, for example (Chakrabarty et al., 1994; Fratkin, 1994). The Sahih Muslim, which dates back to approximately the eighth century, refers to the use of agarwood for the treatment of pleurisy and its use is referenced in the Ayurvedic medicinal text the Susruta Samhita. so I have replaced the incorrect citation, and removed reference to the unmentioned Sahih al-Bukhari and changed 9th to 8th century. --Bejnar (talk) 23:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section source 

message: I added the common name eaglewood (same as Aquilaria but in English, and found in many reference texts in English). I added references to the mention of aloes in the perfume recipe in Psalms 45. I took a moment to make a link to distinguish aloeswood from Aloes ferox, known in America as "bitter aloes," with which many Americans confuse it. Then i deleted a redundant sentence because the data about the costliness of agarwood oil was already given and did not need to be stated as the costliness of oud oil, since they are the same thing. cat yronwode, not logged in 75.101.104.17 (talk) 02:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a few refs and links
Talk:Bessel filter

message: omega0 is not the cut-off frequency! This got me totally confused while I was trying to implement one. omega0 is a frequency chosen to give you the cut-off frequency you desire, which isn't the same thing. I have added a link to the paper that told me this (although I forgot to log in when I did it. It is http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~ecen2260/slides/FilterSlides.pdf
The next question, of course, is how do you calculate omega0? I'll do some more thinking. Tim Band 11:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: omega0 is the reciprocal delay.  You could work out a formula for 3dB point relative to omega0, I'm sure (it will depend on the order).  Dicklyon (talk) 06:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anyone explain how to realise a Bessel filter? How do you practically connect your operational amplifier? I really like this Bessel approach instead of the fast filters that are available.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knoppson (talk • contribs) 22:46, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Divide it up into second order sections and connect them as biquads  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.69.198 (talk) 01:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

message: Before I created my account, I tried to correct the gain equation in the Example section, but a bot reverted the change in short order.  It looks like the equation in the original article was correct, but an editor (173.218.206.57) changed it on 18 July 2020.  The coefficient for the omega squared term should be 45, not 15.  The gain equation is easy to derive from the transfer function and has nothing to do with, as the editor suggests, substituting omega squared for s.  Once the equation is corrected, then an omega value of 1.756 (or 1.75567) yields a gain of sqrt(0.5).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenriJBass (talk • contribs) 13:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equation Error
Talk:Beer bong

message: The implication that the "beer bong" incident with John Kerry had any significant role in increasing the public's awareness of the device is a spurious claim. Top search engine results for "beer bong" do not include primary references to the Kerry incident. The incident itself resulted in a photograph that very briefly made the news and then faded into history, to be forgotten by most. Including this incident as "trivia" might be acceptable, but suggesting that it is anything more is disingenuous. 132.3.65.78 (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't say that it did do that. Nonetheless, the incident was extensively covered by reliable sources. Remember also that articles should be content preserving (WP:PRESERVE); i.e. nothing should be deleted that belongs in a finished and complete article. Oreo Priest talk 20:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Johnny Squeaky why don't you just leave wikipedia, Your annoying obsession with In popular Culture and Trivia is getting real old. Nobody agrees with you so just face facts and go.2601:7:1940:4C:507C:ACF0:76AA:23E (talk) 16:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beer Bong Incident 

message: Why does it say "translucent yellow-brown liquid" instead of beer? The device is clearly filled with beer as indicated in the title of the article "Beer bong"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.24.136.114 (talk) 23:05, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use
Talk:Wood veneer

message: I propose that the name of the article be changed from :veneer (wood) to :wood veneer. I know that it makes the :veneer disambiguation page less pretty (most of the other entries are of the parentheses type), but it is much more natural. Also, a Google search indicates that it is in use. -- Kjkolb 04:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: support, :Wood veneer rolls of the tongue nicely, but maybe that's because it's the term I'm familar with (Australian.) As for the disambig page, that would make it even :-)  — Graibeard (talk) 07:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true. :-) I went ahead and moved it. I don't think it is that controversial a move. If a lot of objections come later, we can always move it back. -- Kjkolb 10:06, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Timber veneer is more common than "wood". I'll move it if no one objects. 203.25.141.5 (talk) 04:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. No need to move, you can create Timber Veneer as a redirect to Wood veneer if you want. SilentC (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: The article is way too positive and reads like a brochure or guide from a veneer shop.
The history and development section s woefully inadequate.
There is nothing about industry - except for economic benefits.
There are no / not enough sources.
(20040302 (talk) 09:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This reads like an advert.
Talk:Grood

message: The content of this article prior to the redirect to Homestar Runner follows:
:"Grood" is a combination of the words "great" and "good." It has a similar if not identical meaning to those words. It originated from a Flash cartoon on the homestarrunner.com humor website. The cartoon was in a series called "Teen Girl Squad", which is a cartoon within a cartoon, if you will. It features Strong Bad, an animated character from the site, parodying teen girls by drawing stick figure cartoons and doing fake-sounding voice-overs. One of the characters says "grood. I mean good...and great. Great and good." Grood has since become slang amongst those familiar with the homestarrunner.com site. 
-Walter Siegmund 23:29, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motivation for redirect to Homestar Runner
Talk:Wood grain

message: Growth rings versus Wood grain: what is the distinction between the two? --VanBurenen (talk) 20:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They are really growth cylinders. If you cut them across, you get circles, if you cut them lengthwise, you get lines. If you cut them at an angle, you can even get "growth ellipses". StuRat (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the distinction? 

message: From Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama:
"Figure in wood : an illustrated review" - http://aurora.auburn.edu/repo/handle/11200/2414 
This item may help, too: "Annotated bibliography of figure in wood" - http://aurora.auburn.edu/repo/handle/11200/1998
All the best, Wordreader (talk) 02:30, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions for the lonely single reference 

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:food grain -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:47, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Grain"
Talk:Woldemar Bargiel

message: Note: the reason op. 15b is marked as A minor and op 47 as D minor - they can both be found in Illinois system libraries and are listed so in Illinet (there is further corroborating evidence for the op.15b anyway. I haven't seen either yet, however, so can't be that certain of their key. Of course, someone might record them someday. Maybe.) Schissel : bowl listen 18:15, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Mangalampalli Balamurali Krishna

message: Hi, I propose that this article be merged into Mangalampalli Balamuralikrishna as that article already serves a couple of redirects. After merging the information, this article can be made into a redirect. I'd wait for a week for comments and then merge these. --Gurubrahma 18:17, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge notice
Talk:Penrith Castle

message: This is my first page, I know I need to make this a stub now as I understand it. Please bear with me.
--SteveTraylen 18:27, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Even though the article has been substantially augmented, I still cannot see how it really needs four images. Although they are good ones. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The angles with :File:Exterior of present-day ruins of Penrith Castle, 2008.jpg and :File:Penrith Castle in autumn.JPG are similar enough that I think we might just need one of the two. The historic view is worth keeping for historic value and the image currently at the top of the article offers a different view. Nev1 (talk) 17:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. The Autumnal pic is far more artistic, but for the purpose of illustrating the actual ruins, it is taken from a lot further away- focusing on leaves rather than the castle. So I'd !vote, remove the Autumn one, and keep the 2008 picture. If the article were fatter of course I suppose it wouldn't matter so much. But it aint. So it does. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Right then, I've gone ahead and removed it. Nev1 (talk) 00:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good move! Cheers Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 20:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 
Talk:Five Valleys

message: I am assured that there is a published route for the 'Five Valleys Walk' which is significntly harder than that used for the charity walk, because it takes a route from Stonehouse to Nailsworth which goes over Selsley Common. Anyone confirm??Linuxlad 18:42, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I now have a reference for this 'harder' route - Hill (1992) Walking the South Gloucestershire Cotswolds, Thornhill Press, pp100-116. Included in main text.
(Will try to take one myself next time I'm down at my mother's, unless someone beats me to it.) --JennyRad 17:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Engstligenalp

message: Sources: own observation, natives, tourist prospects, book: Wege zum Alpkäse Band 3 (2004):  "zBÄRG IM FRUTIGLAND"; 130 Käsealpen im Amt Frutigen ISBN-Nr. 3-909532-11-X. --Irmgard 18:49, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Famine, Affluence, and Morality

message: Demandingness objection and Famine, Affluence, and Morality have largely the same content. Perhaps they should be merged? Vectro (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Demandingness objection]]? 

message: reference 8 goes to singers paper, not the one titled Herriard (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference 8 goes to singers paper, not the one titled by Arthur 1993
Talk:Seward Mountains (Antarctica)

message: In which category do the Seward Mountains belong?
In "Category:Mountains of Antarctica" ?
Or in "Category:Mountain ranges of Antarctica" ?
Or in "Category:Geography of Antarctica" ? -- Citylover 19:09, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  In which category do the Seward Mountains belong? 

message: There's another range of Seward Mountains, in the Lynn Canal area of Alaska.  I'll title that one Seward Mountains (Alaska) and it strikes me that this range should be Seward Mountains (Antarctica), with this page turned into a disambig; only a two-point disambig, but still needed; or with two different range descriptions on the same page, despite being on different continents?Skookum1 03:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs disambig, or ??
Talk:Leonard Gyllenhaal

message: Hello,
I find on biography of entomologists a different date of birth (3th december and not 13th), and a different first name (Leonhard and not Leonard). I have a doubt about name too. For Pamela Gilbert (1977 A compendium of the biographical literature on deceased entomologists. British Museum (Natural History) (Londres) : xiv + 455 p.), the correct name is Gyllenhal.
Thank for your help.--Valérie75 19:14, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected the birth date from 13 to 3 December. The name is correct according to all Swedish secondary sources mentioned under references. Uppland 19:59, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Portrait should be added if available 
*Needs some copy editing
*Lead needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on research should be expanded
*References should be converted to inline format
*External links to useful online resources should be added if available
Espresso Addict 01:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments