lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:PHYLIP

message: Copyright Notice for PHYLIP
The following copyright notice is intended to cover all source code, all documentation, and all executable programs of the PHYLIP package.
© Copyright 1980-2002. University of Washington and Joseph Felsenstein. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to reproduce, perform, and modify these programs and documentation files. Permission is granted to distribute or provide access to these programs provided that this copyright notice is not removed, the programs are not integrated with or called by any product or service that generates revenue, and that your distribution of these materials program are free. Any modified versions of these materials that are distributed or accessible shall indicate that they are based on these program. Institutions of higher education are granted permission to distribute this material to their students and staff for a fee to recover distribution costs. Permission requests for any other distribution of this program should be directed to license@u.washington.edu. 
</div>
:Above is the copyright info of the PHYLIP package and documentation. --hydkat 15:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it is under a different license, a BSD license that is open-source. Felsenst (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Owing to my retirement and the end of my department's subsidy of my computer accounts on their machines, I have moved the PHYLIP site to a Github account for that project.  The new location is at:  phylipweb.github.io/phylip    Would someone please edit the PHYLIP Wikipedia page to reflect that?  The up-to-2013 list of phylogeny programs will also be found there. Felsenst (talk) 18:46, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, PHYLIP is distributed from that site but people should not try to fetch (or clone) the contents of the site.  The home page of PHYLIP (at the link given above) has links for downloading source code archives and source-and-executables-and-documentation archives for different operating systems.  Any github repositories contain code that is being worked on for the future 4.0 release.  Most of that code will not run. Felsenst (talk) 20:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PHYLIP site has moved
Talk:Michele Jaffe

message: Why is there a page on this lady? She isn't a very well known author.
::What's your point? She's written some amazing books.
:I agree with the first (unsigned) comment. "She's written some amazing books" is a weasel statement, since it's totally subjective and POV. It's also irrelevant, given the official criteria for notability of creative professionals. This lady isn't well known (as far as I know) nor has she produced anything of real global significance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by McKorn (talk • contribs) 00:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This author has been translated into several languages.E-romance (talk) 10:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of United States metropolitan areas by per capita income

message: This page is almost 15 years out of date since it is based on 2000 Census data. The most up to date indicator of median income can be found here:
http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/il.html
The article states "They are listed below in descending order by median household income." When in fact they are listed by per capita income, which is quite different.
What year is the first table??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.41.2 (talk) 19:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah the exclusion of Chicago is glaring at that it's been like that for years now is concerning. Going to flag it and think about how this page can be made useful (or if it's something that's covered better on a different article, which can often be the case with these lists) Qtz arenite (talk) 17:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: What is the source of this data? There was no Census in 2013. There was an American Community Survey in 2013, and every year. This survey appears to contain estimates. Ponydepression (talk) 17:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Figures are from the United States Census, 2013"
Talk:Nicolaus Bruhns

message: Compare: en:Nicolaus Bruhns, de:Nicolaus Bruhns
We have some work to do! :) —Sesquialtera II (talk) 16:02, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh my.  There are quite a few good articles over there; this one also shows how to use musical examples well.  Wow.  Antandrus  (talk) 16:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  German language Bruhns
Talk:Jacob Ammen

message: It is different from the one on his grave available at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 16:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: Wiki mentions he was at West Point teaching only for 2 terms, other websites say Ammen taught at West Point between 5-7 years (see wiki biblios)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.240.36.102 (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Point professor 
Talk:Lucullus

message: Needs working up, and more info, from pages on What links here Neddyseagoon 16:04, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: only had information about Marriages, not about Issue, so I deleted referrence to issue. Naerhu 09:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriages and Issue 

message: I just added a dablink for another Lucullus. I don't know what to do here. 173.66.211.122 (talk) 14:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't Lucullus be a disambigution page for all the Luculli?
Talk:Volga, South Dakota

message: I would change the "Volgarians" reference- I grew up in Volga, and that term was what I'd heard a few people use in a joking manner about those of us in Volga- but never as a serious term.  
Also I would not say tourism is "rampant" in Volga.  There is simply NO tourism in that town, Old Timer's Day- as the one example- is attended mostly by people who live in town, that event is relatively unknown even in nearby Brookings.  7/27/07-- Josh M.
I've lived in Brookings for the last 5 years, and I've never even heard of Old Timer's Day. I'm in Volga all the time visiting in-laws and I know that there is no real tourism. "Rampant" is definately not the correct word for describing it. sdgjake 17:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tourism

message: I can't figure out adding sources for this article, but here's a source for the origin of Volga's name: http://www.volgacity.com/documents/volga_community_profile.pdf ...3/28/2010, Ben K.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.5.133 (talk) 03:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the source. I'll put it up there. sdgjake (talk) 03:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:List of endemic fauna of Puerto Rico

message: Given the length this page is likely to get once all the invert taxa are included, I think that it might be best to maintain the list of spiders separate from this list - retain the current header of the spider section, state that there are X spiders in Y families, and then add a .  Guettarda 20:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What if we removed the family headers in the spider section? I really wouldn't mind a long list as long as everything is found in a single list. Joelito (talk) 21:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed the headers. but when i see the two insects and single tick, i'm almost positive there should be some more :) so i guess linking to external lists is probably in the long run the best way to do it. i only merged the spiders into this list because somebody asked me to do it. cheers --Sarefo 23:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have access to sources on ticks and insects?  Guettarda 05:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spider merge
Talk:J2000.0

message: The article is a bit confusing about ICRS vs J2000.0. From what I understand (I'm a bit confused myself), J2000.0 is simply an epoch, with an associated Earth meridian and equator. ICRS may roughly agree with these coordinates, but is defined completely independently from them. I'm thus not sure that International Celestial Reference System should redirect here. It'd be great if an astronomer could clarify this. MFago 16:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ICRS vs J2000

message: I'm reverting the deletion of :Category:Julian Calendar. As J2000 is essentially a specific Julian date I think the category is relevant. MFago 03:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julian Calendar
Talk:Nikolai Arnoldovich Petrov

message: Mr. Petrov gave recently a couragious interview in the russion weekly journal "Argumenti i fakti", translated @argumets and facts@, where he found clear words to the new rich russian people without any culture and pour television program and pop music. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.140.33.204 (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview
Talk:2003 Mid-south derecho

message: How can this article lack pictures?  There were so many unbelievable pics that were taken during and in the wake of this storm and we have no pictures.  This will probably be a great example of the power of derecho/straight-line wind events for people...but we need pictures to prove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.136.84.170 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Mid-south derecho. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  01:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mid-South Derecho of 2003 →  – Per Talk:August 2023 mid-south U.S. floods#Requested move 22 August 2023 68.129.15.101 (talk) 18:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 August 2023
Talk:Great Dinky Robbery

message: I looked through the sources that were cited, and there does seem to be some disagreement about the date. As I recall, though, only one indicated that the robbery took place in '63, while at least two, possibly three cited 1960. Given that this is something of a folk legend, I expect there to be some issues with details, and I think '63 actually makes more sense, but I'd like to discuss what our evidence is for which date is correct. Cantara 16:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: date

message: Seeing no opposition here so far after placing the tag a few days ago, I do plan to merge this fairly shortly... ++Lar: t/c 17:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There hasn't been any opposition, but a lot of expansion work has been done on this article in the last few days. I'd still rather see the article merged than deleted, but do you think that now there is enough support for it to exist on its own? It seems to me that enough sources have been located to vouch for the incident's importance within the Princeton community as well as its relevance to the rest of the WP readership, and it seems like work on the article is going to continue. Let's wait a bit longer. Cantara 17:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be "opposition", so thanks for speaking out! My concern is that the article may be deleted as a result of the AfD (although that is looking somewhat less likely now) and it's way easier to merge first than undelete and then merge, unless you are an admin, which I am not. I'm fine with waiting though. ++Lar: t/c 17:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still a little unfamiliar with the AfD process, so maybe you can tell me: are the powers that be likely to double check the status of the article before taking votes for keeping and deleting into account? Or should I pop back by the deletion discussion and inform them that the article has been significantly improved? Maybe some people will change their minds. Cantara 18:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The closing admin is not necessarily going to look in the article itself (although it is good if the admin does, I don't think they always do). Popping in with a comment and pointing out the changes (providing a link to the diff is very helpful) is indeed a good idea. It may influence people that come back to check to change their thinking as well as influencing those that are new as well... that's my view of the process. Hope it helps! Happy editing. ++Lar: t/c 19:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Might be an idea to remove those redlinks. Would look a touch more repectable without them. --kingboyk 20:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nod. Typically, only make a link if you think the thing linked to is notable enough to warrant an article of its own, for certain, or if you're willing to make the article yourself, is the guideline I've heard before... ++Lar: t/c 20:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Rosa's Cafe

message: Good morning! A restaurant by the name of TA MOLLY'S  recently closed here in Waxahachie Texas. I woukd love a Rosa's Cafe here. Do you think it's feasible? Maybe a franchise here. Please. 2600:1700:89E0:3C70:E556:BC4F:7B6A:58D1 (talk) 14:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosa's needed here 

message: TA MOLLY'S restaurant just recently closed here in Waxahachie Texas. We would love your restaurant here, we need something more authentic like uour food. 2600:1700:89E0:3C70:E556:BC4F:7B6A:58D1 (talk) 14:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosa's Cafe we want one here please  

message: Building going up next to Rosa's in Amarillo, Texas on Soncy road. What is it? 208.185.120.242 (talk) 18:15, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is going in next to Rosa's on Soncy in Amarillo, Texas? 

message: Building going up next to Rosa's in Amarillo, Texas on Soncy road. What is it? Tony17401!! (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is going in next to Rosa's on Soncy in Amarillo, Texas?
Talk:Impact (typeface)

message: :As sans-serif fonts are generally not suitable for body text,
This is not only POV, it's thoroughly incorrect. There have been whole books published in sans-serif fonts; as a matter of fact, the Wikipedia itself is entirely in sans-serif fonts! 161.11.130.249 16:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sans-serif for body text

message: There aren't any references listed for this article, so it needs more than just the couple of citations that I've asked for, but we might as well start with:
* if it's very common on TV, surely a citation can be found; 
* who says it's easily readable, and compared to what?
...and who says it's more interesting, for that matter?  I'm sure that there's been some critical writing about a font designed so long ago, so it shouldn't be too hard for an interested party to come up with some references. —Eric S. Smith (talk) 21:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: The characters section of this article depends on Impact being installed on the user's computer. This is a good assumption on Windows XP and later computers, but is it true for Macintosh? --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters section depends on Impact being installed 

message: I have found that this was used on the Saving Private Ryan poster as the "saving' part of the title.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starkinator (talk • contribs) 15:10, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Poster Usage 

message: It seems to me that this font belongs to the "Fantasy" generic font family of the CSS1 specification. --Jerome Potts (talk) 23:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  of the "Fantasy" generic font family 

message: That’s it really. They are not the same font. The remark about Google Slides should be edited or deleted. Walkingmelways (talk) 10:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anton is not Impact
Talk:Trifolium stoloniferum

message: A ref found at Amazon:
*Title: Influence of white-tailed deer digestion on running buffalo clover (trifolium stoloniferum: Fabaceae Muhl. ex A. Eaton) germination
*Author: Thomas M Schuler
*Publication: The American Midland Naturalist (Feature)
*Date: April 30, 2003
*Publisher: American Midland Naturalist
*Volume: 149 Issue: 2 Page: 425-428
Distributed by ProQuest Information and Learning. --DanielCD 16:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Constituencies in Wales

message: I have split this largish category into unofficial/semi-official regions as has been done with England.
I initially followed the regions suggested by Wikipedia (in the North Wales, South Wales, Mid Wales and West Wales articles).
However, in retrospect, I think it would be better to merge South (or South-East) Wales with West Wales (or South-West Wales) as, unlike the other areas, IMO there is no clear point where the border can be put (as there is no geomorphological division or rural strip).  For instance, the official NAW regions are divided at a different places from the unofficial areas on Wikipedia .  Although, it would be nice to not have so many constituencies in one category, I think the alternative will cause confusion given that South Wales is one big mass of cities that merge into each other with no clear division.
--Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 16:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Steven Boone

message: Re prod. Note I'm not saying thier discovery of the latest Mersenne prime is not notable, just that one discovery does not a notable mathematician make. Anyway thats the prod proceses working, someone objected enough for me. --Salix alba (talk) 16:56, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support an Afd.  They didn't discover anything - the GIMPS software running on their machines did.  The same software runs on my machine so if I get dealt the 10,000,000 digit prime, I get an article?!  —Wknight94 (talk) 04:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sierra Maestra

message: This section is overblown, and there is a large stain of unsorted links. Please consult WP:NOT. If someone needs all those links, it would be more apropriate to keep them in a user page. Please clean up, and only leave relevant or important references. Qyd (talk)16:58, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources consulted

message: Mention meaning of wiktionary:maestra. Jidanni (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning
Talk:Amy Hempel

message: I find it hard to believe that T.C. Boyle praised this writer, as their work is so opposite from one another. I removed T.C. Boyle's name from the "have sung her praises" line. I can't find any reference made by Boyle to Hempel's work on the Internet, and unless someone can come up with the quote, let's leave Boyle's name out of this article. Griot 17:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Praise by T.C. Boyle?
Talk:Heatwave (band)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 15:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The article currently has text such as The album rode firmly on the tails of its single, "The Groove Line," which rocketed up the charts, leaving the album's other single, the beautiful ballad "Mind Blowing Decisions" gasping for air in its wake. For this, and more besides, I added the POV tag.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why didn't you just tidy it up you lazy bum? I've removed most of the purple prose and partisan remarks so removing the tag. 79.66.254.194 (talk) 11:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment on the content, not on the contributor per WP:PERSONAL. Hyacinth (talk) 12:15, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[POV]] 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Things in Atlas Shrugged

message: *Those portals are on multiple books. This category is on one single book. -- infinity0 20:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability of book

message: *I'm bothered by what amounts to a threat to quit wikipedia if this is not deleted. I beg you not to take a peek at the Star Wars or Star Trek sites; you might have an apoplexy. Regardless of your political alignment, you must concede that she is a major political figure and her writings are quite significant. May I count on your support for stamping out the fanatical and reverential propagandism for Alex Jones (journalist)? --Mmx1 15:36, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Precedents like "Star Trek"

message: :*Have a peek at my  vote (and my talk page). Wikipedia is not a list of trivia. --Mmx1 04:47, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *As far as I can tell our opinions are compatible. Christopher Parham (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Except I'm pushing for a purge and merge. There's too much irrelevant crap about minor literary details. --Mmx1 14:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I refrain from taking stances on issues unrelated to the question of deletion, they are not appropriate for AFD and are better handled at the article's talk page. If the article is kept, you will be free to trim or merge it in conjunction with the other editors. Christopher Parham (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Comment: Well, now I really unsredtand the reason why absolutely nothing can be deleted from this project. Instead of discussing the (lack of ) justification for keeping an article (such as the one on Cindy Sheehan, which is completely irrelevant to an encylopedia or the childhood of Hugo Chavez and the last time he moved his bowls), the general idea is to attack the unclean motivations of the those who propose deletion of absolute nonsense. --Lacatosias 09:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, you'd vote to remove Cindy Sheehan? Fascinating. To tell you the truth, there are thousands of things that bother me about Wikipedia. Instead of getting entangled into things I find silly, I usually contribute in something I find meaningful. Cheers, The Minister of War (Peace) 13:47, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Integrity of AfD
Talk:X-Bomber

message: Classifying X-Bomber as anime is misleading and incorrect, given that there is no animation involved. Unfortunately, Wikipedia appears to lack a Television Puppetry category, which is where this article technically belongs.Kouban 17:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization

message: "Terrahawks" wsa erroneousley referred to as using strings, like Thunderbirds. In fact, it used a muppet-style marrionette system, like Star Fleet. I have ammended the article to reflect this--Crais459 08:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Puppetry

message: I think this article would benefit from the addition of references to reliable sources. I'm struggling to find any, probably because this series pre-dates most online records, but if anyone knows of any reviews or other coverage from back then, this would be extremely helpful. If not then I guess some will be written following the re-release anyhow. Wiw8 (talk) 21:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Worth putting in a redirect to this page for the English title as the Japanese title is not used here. Something like 'Star Fleet (TV series)'?
 WatcherZero (talk) 03:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Is there any actual source for Al Matthews providing the voices of Caliban and Professor Hagan? The SFXB page linked to has no mention of this, nor does Matthews' IMDB page. Optimus Sledge (talk) 15:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al Matthews 

message: I have reverted the title of Episode 18 of the original Japanese version to its actual title as translated. Referring to it as "Commander Makara's Promotion!" is inaccurate, as this episode was not translated to English for Star Fleet in 1982. It was omitted from that version as it was yet another flashback episode, although a small amount of footage from the episode (Makara and Orion celebrating their victory) was incorporated into the previous episode of the UK dub. One home media release of the series does include other footage from the episode, but only in the original Japanese.StolenEyes (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 18 Title