Talk:Jon Peters

message: This is an article clearly written by one of the publicists for Streisand, Gruber, or whoever has conjured up the lawsuit against Peters.  I don't know much about Peters or the situation, but this is unequivocally one of the most unabashedly biased and overtly one-sided articles I have ever seen on Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.251.117 (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Douch Bag" perhaps (do you have valid sources for that?), but certainly notable for having managed and produced several Streisand records and dozzens of "B" movies. Proxy User (talk) 20:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

text: A note from the future. This guy is indeed notable. Somehow he seems to have done a lot, and nearly all of it badly. This article is fair and balanced and just seems to read like he is indeed a douchebag. No need to edit anything, he's rich but it appears no-one likes him and he's no good Sirhissofloxley (talk) 22:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Which has now had some of the most egregious stuff removed.  Some of the sources do not meet WP:RS requirements, and some of the tabloid gossip does not belong. Collect (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The External Links could be pruned or removed.Martinlc (talk) 08:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit of a mess 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jon Peters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071219182836/http://www.comics2film.com/Sandman.shtml to http://www.comics2film.com/Sandman.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090526092210/http://www.nypost.com/seven/05232009/gossip/pagesix/peters_pulls_plug_on_tell_all_170567.htm to http://www.nypost.com/seven/05232009/gossip/pagesix/peters_pulls_plug_on_tell_all_170567.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A discussion about edit-warring at this article and at the related Pamela Anderson article has been started at Talk:Pamela Anderson#Edit-warring. For convenience, I suggested centralizing both discussions there.--Tenebrae (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit-warring

message: An editor at Pamela Anderson has claimed Pamela Anderson said her Jon Peters marriage was annulled, rather than ending in divorce. Yet no cite was provided and a quick check on the Internet turns up no such quote. We cannot make a personal-life claim of annulment without WP:RS citing. That's a WP:BLP violation. And claims that because a marriage license was not filed means the marriage was not valid is POV WP:SYNTH — we aren't California state matrimonial lawyers who can say that, and even if we were, that'd be OR. Anderson says she and Peters were never married; he representative said they were. All we can do is give both statements neutrally. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Pamela Anderson marriage

message: “While growing up in a rough neighborhood, Peters's father died when he was eight years old and his mother later remarried”
This literally says that Peter’s father died at the age of 8 while (the father was) growing up in a rough neighborhood. Very precious young man. 69.116.185.163 (talk) 02:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very confused sentence