lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Philippe Moureaux

message: This article is an abridgement of :fr:Philippe Moureaux. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 18:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation notice

message: Political interference in an article
Philippe Moureaux
No vandalism in Moureaux, except from mister Mario Scolas, a civil servant WORKING for Philippe Moureaux, mayor of Sint-Jans-Molenbeek, see http://www.psmolenbeek.be/Liste.htm. At the bottom appears the name of Mister Scolas. Do you really think his interventions can be 'objective' if he is a civil servant working for the POLITICAL PARTY of the MAYOR ?
:Look, it's very obvious that you care a lot about this.  You obviously feel your criticism of this guy is deserved.  Frankly, I have no idea about his politics or your criticism and I doubt that the other editors do, either.  The problem is, you are stuck in an edit war and your criticism is never going to be heard unless you learn how to rephrase it in a tone that matches this encyclopedia.  It is your phrasing, not your criticism, that is causing editors to assume you are a vandal instead of someone with a valid concern.
:So, do you really want your voice to be heard, or do you want to just keep banging your head against the wall?
:If you want to make an edit that isn't going to get reverted, you need to rephrase your criticism so it fits the format of an encyclopedia.  Don't talk about "his hatred of anything Flemish," but cite how his policies are detrimental to the Flemish people.  Don't warble about "what he thinks of as a nightmare," but instead dig up quotes from him about what he feels about a Flemish presence in Brussels (you're not a mind reader - none of us know what someone "thinks").  And for God's sake, if you want to be taken seriously, don't whine about the guy's mustache!  Frankly, I think the guy elected president in my country looks like a chimpanzee, but I'd rather comment on his detrimental policies than his appearance.
:Take a look at Karl Rove or Bill Clinton if you want to see how to write a critical article.  Also, marking it in a dedicated section labeled "criticism" goes a long way to avoiding reverts by other editors.  Try placing your edits on this talk page and asking for help in how to phrase it.  I guarantee that you'll have people helping you come up with an edit that leaves your criticism intact.
:Additionally (and I apologize if I'm lecturing you), getting an account instead of editing anonymously goes a long way to getting your comments treated with respect.  The reality is that editors who see critical remarks without properly formatted citations (see Wikipedia:Footnote for how to do that) from anonymous editors are going to assume vandalism first.
:Finally, don't modify other peoples user pages!  If you want to leave me a comment, do it at User_talk:KNHaw, not User:KNHaw.  When editors see people modifying others' user pages instead of talk pages, the assumption is that its vandalism, not discussion.
:  Good luck.  --KNHaw (talk) 17:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moria Scolas, a civil servant form Molenbeek, the town of mayor Philippe Moureaux
Talk:Tabanus bovinus

message: J 2806:261:498:206:655F:A60D:D56F:F687 (talk) 15:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabanus bovinus , a veces llamado tábano gigante pálido , es una especie de tábano mordedor . Como su nombre científico sugiere, prefiere bovinoanimales como fuente de sangre, aunque también puede morder a otro tipo de mamíferos. El insecto es relativamente grande para un tábano, los adultos suelen tener entre 25 y 30 mm de largo. Como la mayoría de los otros tábanos, sus ojos compuestos son muy coloridos con patrones en forma de rayas. Su cuerpo y alas son en su mayoría de color gris pardusco. Es bastante rápido y un volador capaz, siendo capaz de evadir la mayoría de los intentos de aplastarlo con facilidad. Muerde a los humanos con poca frecuencia, debido a su preferencia por los animales bovinos. Este tábano que zumba fuerte puede ser una molestia, ya que da vueltas alrededor de su objetivo y ocasionalmente aterriza para dar un mordisco (en el caso de los humanos, la mosca generalmente vuelve a despegar). Sin embargo, para los humanos es considerablemente menos dañina que las moscas de los ciervos ( Chrysops ), que muerden con mucha más fuerza.
Talk:Tachinidae

message: Can somebody clarify the last phrase of the following sentence?
:They are endoparasites (internal parasites) of caterpillars of butterflies and moths, adult and larval beetles, sawfly larvae, various types of true bugs and grasshoppers, rarely in centipedes, with usually only one grub.
Does it mean that usually a host individual has only one maggot? —JerryFriedman  (Talk) 01:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "only one grub" 

message: Is this statement encyclopedic: "...more than 8,200 known species and many more to be discovered."?  This is only speculation, isn't it? Paulburnett (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Many more (species) to be discovered"? 

message: A comment in the article refers to Tachinidae as generalist parasites.  Some species are generalists but many, probably most, species have narrow host ranges.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Host specificity
Talk:Ventricular septal defect

message: We need clarification in the Diagnosis section.  First, under auscultation, someone wrote that this method was sufficient for ruling out a VSD if (a) done by a pediatric cardiologist and (b) assuming that the pressures in the RV were normal.  Pediatric cardiologists generally see patients who have been referred to them by pediatricians who have reason to be suspicious (murmur or cyanosis or shortness of breath).  Also, how would someone determine what the RV pressures are by auscultation?  Or do they look for symptoms of pulmonary hypertension and from there deduce that maybe the RV pressures could be elevated?  We should be explicit.
In particular, have other cardiac imaging modalities come into common use for initial identification of congenital heart defects e.g cardiac MRI less invasive than a cath.
Hi, I am a doctor and that is all right. The diagnosis place is all correct. 
According to p16 of Cardiology by R. H Swanton, Blackwell Publishing's Pocket Consultant series () VSDs occur in 2 in 1,000 births. This article gives the figure of 2-3 in 10,000 and appears to have no source for that figure. Conveniently the book is available on google books if anyone wants confirmation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raburton (talk • contribs) 21:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: We

message: The sections about it are describing actual function and some success rates, but it presents as biased for now, almost like an advertisement. If Amplatzer is the only available treatment option, things are more ok, but it should be stated. If not: 3 sections about Amplatzer (r) is too much and as for now it presents itself as rather biased... Moresonic (talk) 09:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Amplatzer(R)

message: There is one brief paragraph that mentions VSDs from heart attacks, but the mechanism is poorly explained and no treatment or prognosis is given. The rest of the article is clearly presuming a congenital condition and neglects and excludes other causes and types of patients. 98.176.69.41 (talk) 11:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assumes congenital defect
Talk:Tasmanian giant crab

message: Would be useful to have the average weight of males and females, not this vague "reaching a mass of 17.6 kg". Nog642 (talk) 22:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average weight 

message: A fossil crab, Pseudocarcinus karlraubenheimeri has been discovered in New Zealand. 
https://www.iflscience.com/largest-fossil-crab-claw-ever-discovered-is-8-million-years-old-73143 2407:7000:8385:6D00:81C6:7CF8:47EA:4237 (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudocarcinus karlraubenheimeri
Talk:Telamonia dimidiata

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Telamonia dimidiata female.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 3, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-11-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Telamonia dimidiata female.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Tenagomysis

message: I have no wish to start an edit war, so I will just categorically state here that the type species of a genus is NOT always given in the form it's "original form"! A type species is a nominal species, which means it may differ from the currently accepted valid name for the species, and should be cited as the original NOMINAL SPECIES. That much is true. Beyond that, there is nothing! Carcinologist2 (talk) 06:48, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Type species citation
Talk:Tesnusocaris

message: Hello User:Apokryltaros, do you have a source of information that proofs this assertion: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tesnusocaris&type=revision&diff=788192432&oldid=788191937 ? Thanks, --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 09:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: --Mr Fink (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 15:26, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation needed
Talk:Patent ductus arteriosus

message: I'm suggesting that the PDA section of Ductus arteriosus be merged here as it contains information that this page does not. This suggestion is not indended to exclude the appearance of a PDA section on the DA article, merely to ensure that all the information is included on this page. In the event of a merge, I recommend adding a 'See full article' template to the top of the orignal section on the DA page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.11.135.5 (talk) 01:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with PDA section of [[Ductus arteriosus]]  

message: Redundant information: "In some babies, on the other hand, the ductus arteriosus remains open." This isn't on the other hand... PDA is when the ductus arteriosus remains open... exactly what was being discussed previously.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.98.122.123 (talk) 16:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Patent ductus arteriosus

message: How about mentioning the association with Eisenmenger Syndrome later in life? Mkayatta (talk) 00:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other

message: Typical ECG findings exist, depending on the size and shunt of the duct.
Restrictive PDAs will volume load the heart and cause LA and LV dilatation. Only the LA dilatation will show up on the ECG, but the LV dilatation will be seen on an X-ray.
Unrestrictive PDAs put a pressure load on the right ventricle and will lead to RV hypertrophy
118.209.59.60 (talk) 01:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ECG and XRAY findings
Talk:Tetranychus urticae

message: How about something on control of these disgusting pests? Malathion is supposed to work, but I have had trouble.
How about something on their life cycle?
I live in Riverside CA, thanks for the great picture which allowed me to identify what I have got in my garden.  Would be interested in knowing if they are dangerous to humans at all and the most effective way to get rid of them in an aquaponics system.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.86.69.87 (talk) 09:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Very Incomplete

message: This page and the one about spider mites are almost identical. They should be merged and have a redirect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.94.158 (talk) 12:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Double Page
Talk:Tetraopes tetrophthalmus

message: Beetles undergo a full metamorphosis with egg, larva, pupa, adult. The larva may molt several times, but it looks more or less like a worm. Beetle larvae are often called "grubs." True bugs have the incomplete metamorphosis with instars between molts, each instar looking more or less like the adult does. An insect enthusiast or entomologist could use to visit this article; Tetraopes is quite common in cities, a beetle most Americans see from time to time. Jessegalebaker (talk) 00:38, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instars
Talk:Texas leafcutter ant

message: Really?  as opposed to farming fungus off the leaves like other leaf-cutter ants?    cite?  Aapold (talk) 22:56, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and reverted since that was added on the last edit. Aapold (talk) 22:58, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This ant eats leafs?
Talk:Thaumastochelidae

message: I don't think I did the "external link" properly.  My apologies.  I found a better source for the fifth species and added it along with the new information.  The information is also available on the coml website (in the images section with a short paragraph description), but as the site is in flash, I cannot figure out how to point to that particular page.  I understand the fox ref was not as clear as it should have been.  Hopefully this is better.  Cmiych (talk) 07:45, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that text makes it a lot clearer that this is a fifth (presumably as yet unnamed) species. I've formatted your addition slightly differently, and made the link a little more direct (n.b., it's coml.org; I tried the URL you gave, and it was, er..., something else). I don't know how widely that image has to be disseminated before we can claim fair use on it. I'd love to have it illustrate the article, and there certainly don't seem to be any free alternatives. Having checked the guidelines, it looks like we'd need explicit permission. --Stemonitis (talk) 08:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sincerely sorry for the bad link.  It was late last night, and I'd done some drinking during Thanksgiving dinner.  I'll see if I can contact coml.ORG and try to get permission.  Thanks for the cleanup. Should the national geographic link not be included as an additional source?  It all seems to be the same information.  Just curious.  Cmiych (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fifth species
Talk:BRDC International Trophy

message: What does GPM (2006 race onwards) stand for? I assume it's not Grand Prix Masters. DH85868993 (talk) 08:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the problem... it does stand for Grand Prix Masters: this version; the one for old cars, not old drivers. It's confusing that they are both called the same thing! Pyrope 14:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded "GPM" to "Grand Prix Masters" and linked it to the external site. Hopefully that will make it clear for everyone. DH85868993 (talk) 02:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GPM 

message: The winner of 1980 is incorrectly named. Eliseo Salazar won International Trophy, APRIL 20, 1980. Derek Warwick won another race - 1980 Silverstone F2, JUNE 8, 1980. Mike-fiesta (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! Thanks for pointing that out. Fixed now. Pyrope 20:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

text: * Ok! Mike-fiesta (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1980
Talk:Thaumetopoeinae

message: Is Raumier the correct name for the early study of this caterpillar? Fabre's "The Life of the Caterpillar" mentions that Réaumur has written about it, but no one called Raumier.
See the text of Fabre in English: http://www.ibiblio.org/eldritch/jhf/c01.html
Londonbroil (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello. Thaumetopoeidae is treated as a family in this article, but recent molecular phylogenetic studies, for example ,   and Zahiri et al. (2011) suggest that it should be a subfamily of Notodontidae (since recognizing Thaumetopoinae as a family would make Notodontidae polyphyletic group). J.S. Miller, cited in the article, also treats Thaumetopoinae as a subfamily of Notodontidae in another paper. Perhaps the title of this article should be changed to "Thaumetopoeinae". --森津 (talk) 06:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subfamily Thaumetopoeinae 

message: Please indicate whether you Support or Oppose the requested move, giving brief reasons. Those that cite relevant policies and guidelines will be more useful. Those that show no understanding of the issues may be discarded. If new to Requested Moves please see wp:RMCOMMENT.  
* Relisting comment: Raises some interesting issues! See #Discussion below. Andrewa (talk) 19:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Tiphiidae

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Male yellow flower wasp02.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 5, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-02-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 17:59, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Male yellow flower wasp02.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Hydropsyche tobiasi

message: :"The reason for its extinction might the industrial and urban pollution of the River Rhine."
:Combined with Weasel Words.
:Unless cited, this is a ver poor speculative statement.
:Inlines would be nice.   Vengeance is mine, saith the Prime  10:50, 11 Aug 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:OR|Original Research]]
Talk:Vamadeva

message: I think the article should be re-written to focus on the aspect of Shiva, and a new article could be created for the sage. If the Vamadevas are identified with the Rudras as the article currently states, the section needn't be present in this article as the Rudras have their own article. Chronikhiles (talk)  14:14, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed my mind upon coming across Pancacana, which covers the five aspects of Shiva of which Vamadeva is one. Since I think the aspect is adequately covered in that article, I will go ahead and make this existing article about the sage. If anyone would like to modify my edits and start a discussion with me regarding this, I'd appreciate your input. Chronikhiles (talk)  12:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write required
Talk:Treehopper

message: "See gallery"?  —141.153.217.179 (talk) 02:41, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery? 

message: The information regarding hypotheses for the origin of the helmet is outdated. Later work by Miko et al. (2012) PLoS ONE and Yoshizawa (2011) Systematic Entomology demonstrated that Prud'homme et al. (2011) (cited from the article) misinterpreted anatomical features of the developing nymphs. I wanted to register this here in case anyone is watching this page and wants to improve it, but I will write an improvement myself in a couple of weeks. CeraFisher (talk) 18:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morphology
Talk:Triatoma

message: In trying to track down the most recent classification of species in Triatoma, it appears that the most recent checklist that shows all species names (Galvão et al., 2003) has been superceded in some respects by a later publication (Schofield & Galvão, 2009), which eliminated a few of the genera to which some former Triatoma had been removed. Unless I can find some more recent publications on classification in the next day or so, it is probably better to put these species back into Triatoma, despite the absence of an explicit updated checklist. Fortunately, only one of these former genera (Mepraia) has an existing article that will need to be wiped clean and converted into a redirect, and only contains three redlinked taxon names. Dyanega (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification 

message: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/14/4/331 shows a new species Triatoma yelapensis.  I don't know how to specify.  --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New species
Talk:Colchian culture

message: The time period given the Colchian C. in the text ends when that of the picture starts. How shall we understand this contradiction? HJJHolm (talk) 06:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: dear HJJHolm,
what I understand is that this is the map at where the Colchian culture transforms into Colchis. I hope this resolved your concerns.
--SkinOfHooman (talk) 02:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation
Talk:Trigonalidae

message: @Dyanega: Hello. I'm aware that you're a commissioner, and I do respect your judgment about what the valid spelling is. It is a fact, though, that literature continues to disagree about it. See e.g. "﻿Integrated taxonomy unveils new species of Trigonalyidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) from Yunnan, China," last year in the Journal for Hymenoptera Research. I respect that you think the spelling shouldn't be controversial, but that is a different thing to it not being controversial. Fellow Creature (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not entirely sure you appreciate how narrowly I'm applying the term "controversy". I can give a very solid analogy: if I say "Joe Biden won the 2020 US Presidential Election" and lots of people say that the winner was Donald Trump, to me that is not a controversy, because there is OBJECTIVELY zero support for one of the two "sides". The situation with Trigonalidae versus Trigonalyidae is the same: OBJECTIVELY there is only one correct answer, and that is because the ICZN Code is explicit. Just because some people don't know, or refuse to acknowledge, what the Code says, does not make it a "controversy". The point remains, that as of January 1, 2000, the date the present edition of the Code went into effect, there was a new rule that went into effect on that date - Article 29.5, which did not exist until that date - and that rule objectively established that Trigonalidae was the correct spelling, as of that date. Any authors publishing the spelling "Trigonalyidae" after January 1, 2000, acted in direct violation of the Code, whether they were aware of their error or not, and whether they actively disagreed with the Code, or not. Frankly, I don't believe that stating what the rules actually say is "POV pushing". Dyanega (talk) 19:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trigonalidae vs Trigonalyidae
Talk:Yama Loga

message: The title should be re-named "Yama Loka" (which means the abode or realm of Yama in Sanskrit). I have no idea where the author got "loga" from.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.228.168 (talk) 11:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title to "Yama Loka"
Talk:Sarila

message: The present (maha?)raja of Sarila, Narendra Singh Sarila, was the aide de camp of Mountbatten at the time of the partition of India, circa 1946.  A few years ago (2003-4?), he wrote a letter to the _Times of India_ in which he revealed a surprising secret about the roles played by Mountbatten, Jinna (the leader of the Congress Party?), and others in promoting the idea of partition.  The letter stirred up a lot of controversy (which I personally don't understand, though I realize this was a crucial turning point in modern world history; I believe Anglophobes and conspiracy theorists have used the story to bash the British Empire).  Later (2005?), he wrote a book about it, _The Shadow of the Great Game— The Untold Story of India’s Partition_.  Sarila (or Singh?) was an ambassador to Spain (I shook his hand in Madrid in 1973), and Switzerland (at least), and was CEO of Nestle's of India.  His father was popular in New York high society in the 1950s -- quite distinguished, handsome and jovial.  The controversy certainly deserves discussion somewhere.  (Sorry, but I'm no good at Wikipedia.  Dyslexic, too.) --Marshall Price of Miami, Nov 22, 2006
:I still find it very disappointing that Narendra isn't mentioned in this article. Unfree (talk) 22:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)