Talk:Battle of An Lộc

message: :Image:Soldier on M-41.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 09:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Soldier on M-41.jpg

message: :Image:An Loc wounded.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:An Loc wounded.jpg

message: got some other ongoing improvements i'm putting into this page at the minute as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZubenelgenubiA2L (talk • contribs) 18:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: order of battle of ARVN needs added to

message: Could somebody more knowledgeable than myself take a look at the strength section in the sidebar giving the battle overview?  Specifically, it states the the ARVN and US strength was only 7,500, but one of the sub-categories lists 52,500 combatants. Also, the casualties are listed as 8,000, which is 500 more than the strength column total even lists participated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.22.147.119 (talk) 17:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Strength" category in sidebar  

message: Instead of calling the U.S. and South Vietnamese Belligerents, can we have a separate box, and label them "responders?"  Its an unfair, inaccurate label to call both sides Belligerents, when the whole war was the cause of North Vietnamese aggressions.  206.192.35.125 (talk) 12:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, what I've seen in sources is that regardless of which side is the aggressor, once it is general conflict (certainly after the years that the Viet Nam War had been going on up to this point), both sides are referred to as belligerants. 192.88.94.1 (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are you replying to a 9 year old comment? Mztourist (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Belligerents

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of An Lộc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609183306/http://www-cgsc.army.mil/carl/resources/csi/willbanks/willbanks.asp to http://www-cgsc.army.mil/carl/resources/csi/willbanks/willbanks.asp
*Added  tag to http://anloc.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Base on what He told he is the one that the Vietnamese BBC News want him to talk about the battle.  He is Lieutenant Colonel in that time. And please remember what happen in 1972, America recall all the military back.  In that time who staying for the last is Him and His teammate.  May I ask why his name not the leader broad? 173.0.25.91 (talk) 13:20, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because we require WP:RS to support all claims. If you can provide properly referenced RS then you can add him. 
Mztourist (talk) 13:11, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

text: WP:BURDEN. Mztourist (talk) 06:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nguyễn Thanh Tiên is one of battle of An Loc leader