Talk:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles & Other Strangeness

message: I don't think "After the Bomb" counts as a Sequal to TMNT and Other Strangeness.  It was a sourcebook to add new characters, rules, locations, etc.  There were a few sourcebooks added to work with TMNT.  I don't think there was ever a sequal... --Undrhil 08:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After the Bomb(1986) was originally just a supplement (subtitled "A Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle Supplement"), but it later became a setting of it's own. I have a book, Mutants of the Yucatan (from 1990), which is billed as "After the Bomb Book 4" and it barely references the "...and other strangeness" book or the TMNT at all. -Rjo 11:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: After the Bomb

message: :Image:TMNT and Other Strangeness.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TMNT and Other Strangeness.jpg

message: Should the ATB suppliments be noted as such since they are a slightly different setting? 203.35.135.136 (talk) 03:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suppliments 

message: Currently this item redirects to the main page. It should have it's own page. And what is the official title anyway... I see reference to an Accessory Pack too. Leitmotiv (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Adventures Supplement OR Accessory pack 

message: A supplement that doesn't seem that notable and is a stub Neonchameleon (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Guide to the Universe]] 

message: Supplement that's a stub and seemingly not notable Neonchameleon (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Truckin' Turtles]] 

message: No references, no apparent notability, supplement for merge to main game Neonchameleon (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Turtles Go Hollywood]] 

message: Nothing to suggest the supplement warrants a stand-alone page BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 23:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of these do have independent reviews; in this case I can add the one from Different Worlds when I have a chance if that helps. BOZ (talk) 00:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Independent reviews are great, but (as an RPG novice) is that really enough to warrant a standalone? Wouldn't a supplement section with the information and reception for the supplement if that's only a few sentences be neater and more robust? I mean, you can get independent reviews for multiple issues of comics or TV shows, it doesn't necessarily then follow that they should automatically have their own page if there's not much else to be written about them. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. Short reviews in specialist press (that is, ones that are just part of a column with other reviews, not separate independent coverage) don't actually contribute much to notability as such reviews (which are typically rather surface level in terms of analysis) fall under WP:ROUTINE. None of these supplements really have significant independent notability. oknazevad (talk) 18:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

text: I don't believe this should be necessary to be merged, if it can be improved. 164.44.0.57 (talk) 14:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Support merge for both pages as proposed. Regardless of the notability arguments, readers are better served by having supplements discussed with the RPG itself for reasons of short text and context. Further encyclopedic expansion seems unlikely given that the articles have existed for 17 years. Klbrain (talk) 17:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Adventures (role-playing game supplement)]] into [[Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles & Other Strangeness]] 

message: Again nothing to suggest this shouldn't be folded in to the main article BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 23:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Still trying to find what I can for more sources on these, would prefer to build them up than merge them. BOZ (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

text: I don't believe this should be necessary to be merged, if it can be improved. 164.44.0.57 (talk) 14:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Guide to the Universe]] into [[Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles & Other Strangeness]] 

message: The Kickstarter for the redux edition of TMNT & Other strangeness recently ended. Should a blurb be added to the article in the release section, and if so, now, or closer to the actual ship date? Rhinorulz (talk) 09:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redux Edition remaster