Talk:V. J. and Angela Skutt Catholic High School

message: There is discussion of a alleged lawsuit filed by this school against a Wikipedian here Wjhonson 23:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion removed by Tony Sidaway. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 00:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To make it easier to find later: . --cesarb 03:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Wjhonson 23:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry, the Fremont URL is obsolete now.  Use Lawrence Journal-World (Kansas)Tuxide 05:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Also Lincoln Journal Star (Nebraska), Grand Island Independent (Nebraska) Tuxide 16:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Also Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-07-24/Skutt suit.  Tuxide 23:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Also eSchool News.  Tuxide 19:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Also Student Press Law Center. Nothing new other than some quotes I haven't seen before (silly attorney thinks it's Wikipedia.com)  Tuxide 23:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Those comments were removed either because they were false or uncited and have nothing to do with the current lawsuit controversy.  Everything about the lawsuit (except for the humorous "Nebraska moves to Canada" article on The Register) is already mentioned on Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-07-24/Skutt suit.  I am from Omaha, and I know nothing more about this lawsuit than what is already mentioned.  Tuxide 03:10, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't refering to the "truth" of those comments, merely the fact that they were added to this wiki page. Clotten 03:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

text: But don't get me wrong: I'm not going to add them back or anything. I always forget about the signposts...Clotten 03:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The edit history was wiped before you brought it up - indeed, before this even happened, due to an unrelated incident of vandalism - which may be what's confusing matters... Shimgray | talk | 01:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any development on this?  I haven't heard anything about this case since July.  The only "news" I've been reading on this incident is about this Wikipedia article itself instead of the lawsuit.  Tuxide 05:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lawsuit

message: The URL to the Omaha World-Herald article is obsolete now, we should probably find one to replace the same URL in the article related to this talk page.  Also, I have noticed that many blogs are making inaccurate statements on this subject, such as Skutt Catholic High School has sued Wikipedia or that the edit history was wiped because Skutt officials requested it or removed it themselves.  Neither of those are true; Skutt officials are suing an anonymous user (or a group of anonymous users) only to find out who they are, and the edit history was wiped only after I brought up the story on Wikipedia's Freenode IRC channel (see ).  I'm pretty sure that if for any reason Skutt officials need to view the edit history containing the defamatory material, then it can be restored.  Regards, Tuxide 23:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The edit history was wiped before you brought it up - indeed, before this even happened, due to an unrelated incident of vandalism - which may be what's confusing matters... Shimgray | talk | 01:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any development on this?  I haven't heard anything about this case since July.  The only "news" I've been reading on this incident is about this Wikipedia article itself instead of the lawsuit.  Tuxide 05:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification

message: No, just semi, since most of our problems came from annon IP edits. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 22:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ... or even 'anon' edits ... --AlisonW 23:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Protection 

message: :Image:Skuttcatholic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Skuttcatholic.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on V. J. and Angela Skutt Catholic High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090429033455/http://www.advanc-ed.org:80/schools_districts/school_district_listings/? to http://www.advanc-ed.org/schools_districts/school_district_listings/?
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified