Talk:Jim Swire

message: I removed stuff that's really a recounting of the trial. We already have articles that cover this - this article should be about the person. DJ Clayworth 18:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the point of this article needs to be made more clear. It just states that he is a doctor in the opening paragraph and then gives details of his life.Ray gillespie 07:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for this observation: I've revised the intro to clarify the point of the article.Phase4 09:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...Did Swire not spend some time in the military as an officer and given knowledge of explosives during that period of his life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.154.168 (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the point of this article? 

message: Clearly the powers that be have destroyed Jim Swire's working life, and now looks for full redaction. Well done moderators for allowing this article to descend into chaos. May I suggest that Jim Swire's efforts digging into the nonsense behind his daughters murder be assigned to the Orwellian "Memory Hole" ASAP. This entry is totally pointless. This bombing happened 23 years ago, and still the lies are full on, even extending to the release of al-Megrahi - it's never ending. 23 years of Jim Swire's campaigning and we have this garbage. I despair. This sort of article is the reason I would NEVER contribute money to Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.226.16 (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a total mess 

message: I'm going to remove a good bit of unsourced content, the last version before I started is at , and can be checked if someone wants to look for facts to restore -- after finding sources for them.  What I would suggest *instead*, however, is narrowing and focusing content which does not directly refer to Swire, and looking for new material which discusses him specifically  Anyway, it's done now, have at. --j⚛e deckertalk 06:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  At least I can take a knife to this 

message: Re: The removal of this content
The Cohens believed Swire was being manipulated by Gadhafi and the Libyan government. Their claims are in a non-self-published book, and I do think it is important to include that view. If other people believe the same view they can be mentioned too.
WhisperToMe (talk) 17:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Susan and Daniel Cohen and Jim Swire 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Jim Swire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/capitolhill/5260/egyptsw.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jim Swire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150630113406/http://www.firmmagazine.com/justice-for-megrahi-campaign-launches/ to http://www.firmmagazine.com/justice-for-megrahi-campaign-launches/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified