Talk:Controlled Drugs and Substances Act

message: All the *zapem drugs ( like clonazepam ) are Schedule 1 drugs in Canada, NOT schedule 4 drugs : 
http://napra.ca/nds/clonazepam-and-its-salts
http://napra.ca/nds/diazepam-and-its-salts
Honestly, the entire section listing drug schedules should be either rewritten entirely or removed entirely.
I added a dispute tag to the main article so that people understand there are errors, while someone fixes it or deletes it.
I don't want to delete it because I am *not* an expert in the field of pharmacology or drugs, so I just added this comment and the dispute tag.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.37.109.162 (talk) 12:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad schedules for drugs 

message: Would people trying to edit the schedules just go to the Justice Department website and look?  Schedule 2 is NOTHING BUT CANNABINOIDS!  Copied and pasted...
Cannabis, its preparations, derivatives and similar synthetic preparations, including
(1) Cannabis resi
(2) Cannabis (marijuana)
(3) Cannabidiol (2–[3–methyl–6–(1–methylethenyl)–2–cyclohexen–1–yl]–5–pentyl–1,3–benzenediol)
(4) Cannabinol (3–n–amyl–6,6,9–trimethyl–6–dibenzopyran–1–ol)
(5) Nabilone ((±)–trans–3–(1,1–dimethylheptyl)–6,6a, 7,8,10,10a–hexahydro–1–hydroxy–6,6–dimethyl–9H–dibenzo[b,d]pyran–9–one)
(6) Pyrahexyl (3–n–hexyl–6,6,9–trimethyl–7,8,9, 10–tetrahydro–6–dibenzopyran–1–ol)
(7) Tetrahydrocannabinol (tetrahydro–6,6,9–trimethyl–3–pentyl–6H–dibenzo[b,d]pyran–1–ol)
(7.1) 3-(1,2-dimethylheptyl)-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-6,6,9-trimethyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-1-ol (DMHP)
but not including 
(8) Non–viable Cannabis seed, with the exception of its derivatives
(9) Mature Cannabis stalks that do not include leaves, flowers, seeds or branches; and fiber derived from such stalks
So why do people add stuff like Amphetamines and MDMA when those are schedule 3 substances?  And Oxycodone when it's a schedule 1 substance!  Every time I come back and look at this page, it's wrong!YusufMJH (talk) 00:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: HONESTLY NOW

message: (yes they are confusing everyone) i see people smoking these schedule II drugs freely everywhere in front of law enforcment?) yet nothing happens? who proof reads this garbage? its the dea trying to make mark emery look like pablo escobar.(he aint no escobar to compare the two would be like comparing al capone to mother theresa!
Someone messed with the schedules and got them all wrong, being ignorant and confusing Canada with the United States.  I want to slap them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.106.247 (talk) 07:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SERIOUS MISTAKE!! 

message: 90% sure they are schedule IV, changing them. if someone disagrees change it back and source me thuglasT|C 21:02, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anabolic steroids 

message: According to the section on possession of Schedule 1 drugs, possession of Codeine is punishable for a maximum of 7 years.
This HAS to be missing information. Aspirin/Acetaminophen with codeine(8mg per pill) are sold over the counter (no prescription!). Obviously this kind of possession cannot be punishable. More details on this would be very helpful. Especially, information regarding the possession of codeine extracted through the process of Cold Water Extraction from the pills mentioned above.
Dazalc (talk) 00:28, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codeine Possesion 

message: According to the section on possession of Schedule 1 drugs, possession of Codeine is punishable for a maximum of 7 years.
This HAS to be missing information. Aspirin/Acetaminophen with codeine(8mg per pill) are sold over the counter (no prescription!). Obviously this kind of possession cannot be punishable. More details on this would be very helpful. Especially, information regarding the possession of codeine extracted through the process of Cold Water Extraction from the pills mentioned above.
Dazalc (talk) 00:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codeine Possesion 

message: Someone thought they'd be funny on dec 4 and add a useless comment. A day after, a possibly even more incompetent person 'fixed' it, deleting all of Schedule II. Fixed it. Considering previous attempts of vandalism by unregistered users, I think it would be a good idea to place this page under semi-protection. However, I have no idea how to request this. --MooNFisH (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: The article lists 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) as a Schedule III substance, but this is not explicitly listed in the actual Schedule III.  I'm no chemist, but presuming that MDMA is considered to be included in "Amphetamines, their salts, derivatives, isomers and analogues and salts of derivatives, isomers and analogues", perhaps this should be mentioned in the article?
174.6.82.184 (talk) 15:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MDMA not explicitly listed in Schedule III