lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pulitzer Prize for Fiction

message: This page has been vandalized.  
For example, 1961 was To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, not a book by Seymour Butts.  Also there is no author named Claude Balls.
I am new to Wikipedia.  Can someone make changes and protect this page?
:Hi, welcome to Wikipedia, and good job for removing the vandalism.  Because it was just one isolated incident, it wouldn't be wise to protect the page.  Usually admins save article protection for very serious cases of repeated vandalizing.  Next time, you can revert a person's edits by going through the history and clicking "undo."  Also, don't forget to sign your comments next time!  María: (habla ~ cosas)  12:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: María, could you explain this "undo" feature? It sounds a little like the rollback feature available only to administrators. KennyLucius 22:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, it's very easy to do and it definitely comes in handy.  If you click the History tab at the top of the page, you can click on any of the radio buttons (the circles) on the left-hand side and then click the button that says "Compare selected versions."  The page will then compare two edits, one that says Revision as of such-and-such time (the earlier version) and Current version.  Next to where it says Current version, you'll notice two links, one that says Edit and one that says Undo.  When you click Undo, it'll literally undo the latest edit(s).  Be very, very careful with this feature, however, because you may accidentally wipe out kosher edits with the vandalism.  I'm not sure how it compares to the admin rollback feature, but I do know that any Joe or Jane can Undo edits.  :)  Hope that helps, María (críticame) 00:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I never noticed that button before. It should come in handy :-) KennyLucius 14:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalized

message: Shouldn't it be made clear if "American author" actually means US resident (or citizen, I don't know)? There is more to America than the United States!
--212.51.246.226 09:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the common sense of the word, as used by the English speaking community, "American" refers to someone from the United States (however wrong it may be - trust me, I understand completely).  In other languages this may not be the case. María (críticame) 12:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: American?

message: Include him 2600:100C:B22C:A6EB:68ED:C476:68D9:B963 (talk) 19:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple prize winners excludes Alfred Knopf, twice winning the prize for the Rabbit series 

message: The link to the Standard Ebooks public domain entries of Pulitzer Prize for Fiction is broken. Correct link is https://standardebooks.org/collections/pulitzer-prize-for-fiction-winners 2A00:23C5:3A07:5800:4DBA:8FC9:10EF:629C (talk) 20:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link to Standard Ebooks.
Talk:Bernard Black

message: The problem with this page is that there are far too many specific incidents being attributed as typical bernard black charateristics. These examples happen only once in the entire series and are there purely as jokes which play on his characteristics rather that accually being something he does everyday. for example the phrase "his idea of a stylish haircut is to get someone to slice off clumps of his wildly disordered, overgrown hair with a bread-knife." shouldnt be mentioned as it only happens once and we are not lead to believe that this is a normal occurance. Other such examples of this should be removed from this article and subsequent black books character articles. however, the haircut thing and similar things can be put into a seperate section. A good profile sentince is like this one: "Due to his questionable personal hygiene, the bookshop is also often afflicted with bizarre examples of uncleanliness." which describes something that happens throughout the series without limiting it to a specific incident. i propose to clean up the article by removing unnessicary examples. --Paradox CT 02:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Must everyone be a misanthrope? I would hardly describe Bernard as a misanthrope OR a cynic. "Neurotic" and "pessimistic" are much better.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tzler (talk • contribs) 06:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with 83.147.185.177. He hates people; thats the whole point of the show! Ceoil (talk) 19:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why

message: This is a character page 'Plot details' must be a mistake.
Also the show itself contains countless inconsistencies and I think, as a result,some conclusions are ill-conceived or overstated. For example; 
"When questioned by Manny in Series 1 Episode 2, Bernard reveals that he thought he was gay 'for a bit', but that he was discouraged by 'the prohibitive standards of hygiene. And all that dancing!'. It is revealed in Grapes of Wrath that he used to own a cat, Nipsey. Manny breaks to him the news that Nipsey is dead."
The remark is very flippant and the story moves on rather quickly after. I would have drawn the conclusion that him being a grumpy git and Irish it was a bad joke. (Conorflan (talk) 23:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Subtitle - 'Plot details'
Talk:Record Collection (record label)

message: Record is owned by Warner Bros. It's a faux-indie label that apparently duped the guy who reverted me in the first place. Basically, it's their "indie" imprint. A google for +"record collection" +imprint +Warner turns up enough hits, as do the links provided. Also, a number of other artists listed below mention this fact on their respective pages (Ash and Eisley, for example).
I noticed people keep reverting this. I'm not sure if it's ignorance or obstinacy, but it's annoying. Think about it- how would an independent record label have the money and political clout to release the soundtrack for what will probably be the highest-grossing movie of all time? I included several links to info the first go around...Grumpman 15:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Wanka

message: A wanka is male who performs the act of wanking! Traditionally known as masturbation - the vigorous stroking of the erect penis, until a point of climactic excretion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.47.54.137 (talk) 02:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's wanker, not Wanka. Editor1209 (talk) 06:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wanking
Talk:Brickell City Centre

message: According to an article in 'Miami Today" july 28 2005 This complex is at 7th street, 700 to 701.
http://www.miamitodaynews.com/news/050728/story1.shtml
Also the tenth Street station is a metro MOVER station and is east of south miami avenue. The brickell metro RAIL station is west of south miami ave.
65.11.216.29 21:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  error in location 

message: http://www.miamitodaynews.com/news/050929/story1.shtml — Preceding unsigned comment added by B137 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 BCC article 

message: This ref gives a total size of 5.4 million square feet, which sounds generous, and is probably the slightly gimmicky "total development area". But mostly, it probably includes the yet-uncertain phase two with its 80-story tower plus another building to the north. It also more importantly documents Simon property group joining which is more standard, mass retail than the luxury groups.
Simon Property Group joins Brickell City Centre mall project Brian Bandell South Florida Business Journal
B137 (talk) 14:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref procurement 

message: This article has remained fairly under the radar and untouched for the relative size and scale of this project relative to other buildings in Miami and Florida. It may be due for a big renovation. This project is over 10 times the raw size and cost of other average projects, but more importantly is more significant in it's uses, containing a massive amount of retail that compares to a large suburban mall, which are strangely well-covered on Wiki. It is widely referenced in residential marketing all over South Florida, not just in Brickell, and is considered directly responsible for the haste of nearby development within a few blocks, which are almost certainly the most active urban blocks in the state currently. For other buildings, it's hard enough to knock together enough media mentions to get a minimum passable article, complete with nearest barely relevant transit connection to Metromover/Metrorail within x blocks. This project proudly rebuilt a station without destroying the base and will likely unlock the third floor door in November when the retail opens. The four or so blocks that are encompassed actually, for the first time ever despite how badly the term has been worn, feels like New York. The parking, while there is a lot of it, is below ground and mostly out of sight. Not to come across as an overzealous fan, it is a higher end development, and the retail is not for me, but it's still widely more significant than most of the individual things around it. B137 (talk) 02:10, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention, quality relative to visibility and amount of potential sources and coverage
Talk:U.S. State Non-resident Withholding Tax

message: Perhaps I should have nominated this article for deletion.  It was wrong and/or seriously misleading. By my count, 30 states have similar requirements (out of 45 with income tax), not just the few mentioned. Numerous SCt decisions indicate that such a tax must be merely a prepayment to be determined under the states normal rules to avoid being prima facie discriminatory.  I think my edit gets this to an acceptable stub. I am still willing to go with deletion if anyone wants to propose such. Oldtaxguy (talk) 19:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salvaged from deletion
Template talk:Col-end

message: 
Here is the new code:

|}

16@r 21:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - Nihiltres(t.l) 14:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Please replace  with , which unintentionally links to wrong namespace. --fryed-peach (talk) 04:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Skier Dude (talk) 08:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong documentation 

message: * :ru:Шаблон:Столбцы/конец
* :dz:Template:Col-end
--Impro (talk) 07:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Disabling. If you look at the template page, these links are already present. Interwiki links on the templates go on the /doc page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 14:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  interwiki 

message: In the source code, is 

|}
necessary? Xin-Xin W. (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question, . This paragraph seems to be there since 2005! Helder.wiki 21:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

text: I'm also interested to know which purpose the  tag serves there. Or is it unnecessary. Can someone explain? Tran Xuan Hoa (talk) 12:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured it out. Since the bar-brace |} must be placed on a new line in order to work, the person who wrote this template wants to avoid the situation when someone doesn't place this template on a new line. Tran Xuan Hoa (talk) 12:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

text:  And Linter doesn't like this construction.  Should be replaced with 

<!-- Blank line for table handling -->
|}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:11, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary Code?
Talk:Running Up that Hill (Within Temptation song)

message: I found a link that suggests the chart debut was at no. 9:
http://www.dutchcharts.nl/weekchart.asp?cat=s&year=2003&date=20030517
Is there a different chart that it debuted at no. 14? --Matt Westwood 15:36, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch chart debut
Talk:Apostolic nunciature

message: I think this should probably be combined with nuncio. As an example, we have a single article for vicars apostolic and for apostolic vicariates. In this case, I think the office and the office holder's title can best be served with one, combined article. Gentgeen 02:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: While the Apostolic Nunciature page says that the US military tried to force Noriega through noise, the Noriega page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Noriega#Capture) says that the noise barage didn't do that and it was just intended to jam microphones to prevent eavesdropping, and it wasn't meant to pressure Noriega to leave.  Which is it?J.J. Bustamante (talk) 23:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradicts the Noriega page
Talk:One King West Hotel & Residence

message: This page talks about the "new tower" and the "renovations" as if these topics had previously been described. When was the new tower added on? I'm sure it wasn't in 1914, as the "construction date" would suggest.
This article sounds a lot like an advertisement when it talks about all the amenities it has. (Many hotels have fridges in the rooms.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.208.60 (talk) 07:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The building and business has been known as One King West for several years now. Should this page be renamed to reflect that?
Jegelstaff (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: One King West name

message: According to their site they are known as One King West Hotel & Residence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattMongeon (talk • contribs) 19:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  One King West
Template talk:Details more

message: Can anyone explain why we have both this and ? --Cybercobra (talk) 07:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate? 

message: This template is a complete duplication of , only it is used on <50 pages according to WhatLinksHere (vs. many many many for ) and is worded just slightly differently. I therefore request this just be made a redirect to Template:see
Evidence of the identicalness:


--Cybercobra (talk) 09:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've unprotected the template; feel free to make the edit yourself. I would note that this template supports up to 15 parameters but  supports only 9. However I would be quite surprised if more than 9 were being used anywhere. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Committee for Charity and Support for the Palestinians

message: I had all of 10 mins to create the article and had planned on comming back to add more info. Google CBSP and you'll find most links are to discussions of their terrorist support so its not unreasonable that in 10 minutes that was the best referencable info I could find.
Thanks for adding so much info and cleaning up the article. But there should be some discussion around the "claims" CBSP makes about itself as obviousley no terror related organization admits to their true functions. Macutty 02:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV claim
Talk:Billennium

message: Shouldn't a billennium be called a bimillennium? Because it is a combination of bi- and millennium, isn't it? I think we should redirect to billennium or move the page to bimillennium. 67.126.77.166 Talk, 04:46 15 March 2007 (UTC)
:Wouldn't a bimillennium be two millennia? --DocumentN (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bimillennium
Template talk:Flora of Australia Online

message: This template is a . It should be placed into that category.  ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 01:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ALSO - please add a  tag Nasa-verve (talk) 03:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  both. Cheers,  Skomorokh  07:28, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Done. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 00:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be sub-categorized 

message: But not genera. MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This template works for species
Template talk:FloraBase

message: I think it should be listed in Category:Australian source templates MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:36, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: However  if you want to categorize the template you can do so at: Template:FloraBase/doc. — xaosflux Talk 02:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, ... MargaretRDonald (talk) 06:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 26 October 2018: needs to be listed in <nowiki>[[Category:Australian source templates]]</nowiki> 

message: See e.g., Bossiaea halophila.  It would be good to have it working again. MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template appears to be no longer working 

message: Hello  and thanks for your work. FloraBase is now administered by the Western Australian Government Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (changed from "Department of Parks and Wildlife".) I'm hoping you will make the correction. Thank you. Gderrin (talk) 03:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 15:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Government Department
Talk:Hovercraft (band)

message: I moved the Unwound/Hovercraft tour from '97 to '96.  I know the U.S. tour with Caustic Resin was in mid-'97 (b/c I missed it and regretted it daily until I finally saw Hovercraft in late '98 w/ IQU).  I bought a Hov./Unwound tour shirt (w/ both band names on it) from a guy in Germany years ago, as well as a live tape he made of it (only of Unwound, though).  I am 98% sure it was from '96, but i will try to dig both up to make sure.
As for the article, I feel it demystifies the band a bit too much, by revealing the true identities of its code-named band members.... But I guess that's what Wikipedia is all bout: providing info.  Also, I feel it reads too much like a tour chronology, but I suppose that is to be expected of a band that toured as much as Hovercraft did.
I forgot the name of the other Hov. fanzine.  If anyone else knows, please add it.
The Hype! footage of the band cannot possibly be from '96, seeing as the film first debuted in January '96, so I changed the pic caption date back to '95.
Chris77xyz 02:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gertrude's Secrets

message: Gertude's Secrets was also available for the Apple II. I don't know which version (Apple or DOS) was the original. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.63.93.147 (talk • contribs).
:I distinctly remember the game running on the Commodore 64 as well. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:South Pacific Division of Seventh-day Adventists

message: I thought that Australian spelling was appropriate for the article, given the location it describes. Colin MacLaurin 02:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: I have significantly expanded, cited and improved the article. However I am concerned that the Seventh-day Adventist Encylopedia (1996 edn) could be out of date on some facts. Please fix any errors you find. Colin MacLaurin 04:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: Just pointing out that the Vision statement image is up for deletion. Colin MacLaurin 10:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Separate articles are needed for union conferences in the South Pacific Division. EG New Zealand Pacific Union Conference and Australian Union Conference. If not, separate article should be created.
DZadventiste (talk) 07:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Union Conferences

message: Someone should add a map of the South Pacific Division. User:Catfurball (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:WCFS-FM

message: I cleaned up some of the language/grammar and links on the page, don't think I changed any of the actual content.67.167.248.233 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 15:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Tadeusz Reichstein

message: He wrote his name in 3 different ways. If you search on WP now, Tadeusz ... takes you to the English page, Tadeus ... to the German page, and Thadeus ... leads you nowhere. Arminden (talk) 17:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pls autodirects for "Tadeus Reichstein" and "Thadeus Reichstein"
Talk:San Martín de Loba

message: In the page on Saint Martin, he is mentioned under the name of "San Martin de Loba" as the patron saint of Vasquez, a village in Colombia. Is there any relation to this page's locale named San Martin de Loba?  -- Deborahjay 21:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village of Vasquez, Colombia
Talk:Gerard Toal

message: Lol, no offense to the good professor, but it would seem as if someone very close to him wrote this article, if not himself.  How is that even his forthcoming articles are known?  Could someone knowledgeable on this writer look this article over for possible POV, please?  Nicolasdz 03:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest? 

message: Why does he need two names anyway??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.219.196.211 (talk) 23:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names
Talk:No One Lives Forever 2: A Spy in H.A.R.M.'s Way

message: I removed the lengthy section listing all the different types of equipment as its not relevant to an encyclopedic article. However it might be worthwhile inserting some brief description of the variety of weapons/gadgets available. Qeee1 (talk) 01:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equipment Section 
Template talk:Organisation of Islamic Cooperation

message: Please can someone change the state here to hidden by default? That would make it fit nicely with any other navigation templates at the bottom of articles. Thanks. Asabbagh 05:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I just saw the collapse option... Asabbagh 07:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shown/Hidden

message: :az:Şablon:İKT
:de:Vorlage:Navigationsleiste Mitgliedstaaten OIC
:ru:Шаблон:ОИК
:tr:Şablon:İKÖ--Uannis 11:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  İnterwiki 

message: Convert to the  stanard form from .  All that needs to be done is to delete the word "generic".  Thanks, --CapitalR 18:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is unprotected, you may do it yourself now. Mr.Z-man 20:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert to navbox from navbox generic
Template talk:Please check ISBN

message: Does not seem to expand properly if used within  as I found it used at this rev of Valley girl. I worked around by moving it out of cite book. --Lexein (talk) 19:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We know; please see Category talk:Articles with invalid ISBNs#Placement of this template? --Redrose64 (talk) 20:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compatibility with cite templates
Template talk:Policy section

message: This is not a high risk template in any way, shape or form. It should be unprotected. —Locke Cole • t • c 03:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the protection level to semi-protected.  It's not widely used, but does appear to be a (fairly) high-visibility template --Philosopher Let us reason together. 10:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: What if I'm alone and get the wrong idea about Bayasian. Medical  Aliciayb (talk) 01:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  miscellaneous miscommunication