lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Formosan subterranean termite

message: Who ever copied that into this article was too lazy to remove the citations, I don't know where it came from but I'm removing it for now. --EmersonWhite (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 08:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there's nothing wrong with quoting sentences from identified sources; the problem is that the sources aren't given in the reference section, but we should be able to rectify that. AxelBoldt (talk) 22:36, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic impact plagiarism removed 
Talk:Sevendust (album)

message: The redirect Bitch(Sevendust Song) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 23:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Bitch(Sevendust Song)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dearborn Mosque

message: Adding a picture shall be fine. --Bhadani 12:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can clarify exactly which one it is, I can make a drive next weekend to get pictures. As I  understand it, there are 5 mosques/Islamic centers in Dearborn. My pictures won't be great, but maybe that will encourage someone else to take better ones. - Taxman Talk 14:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding a picture

message: Isn't Zaydi part of the Shi'a sect?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.128.58 (talk) 22:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yemeni Zaydi
Talk:Battle of Cape Ortegal

message: text vs infobox
-The Gomm 04:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 frigates or 4 frigates? 

message: I don't have time to incorporate the info atm, but there's an excellent source at the national maritime museum cornwall  , and a PD image . Modest Genius talk 01:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: There were 730 killed or wounded on the French side. Any more details?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.134.28.194 (talk) 09:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  killed or wounded?
Talk:Code-excited linear prediction

message: Sorry about the aggressive changes. I think it was needed, but let me know if you think I removed something that shouldn't have been. Layout may not be 100% WP-conformant. Jmvalin 12:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't apologize, it's a major improvement!  Be Bold! --QEDquid 14:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

message: FYI, the first paragraph of the CELP encoder section is copied verbatim without attribution from the first selected reading: Introduction to CELP Coding. I don't know if this is considered bad practice for Wikipedia. 2A02:1811:3707:B900:A8ED:55C6:983A:9C94 (talk) 18:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verbatim copying from selected reading
Talk:World Heritage Sites of the Routes of Santiago de Compostela in France

message: This seems a nice list, but finding anything on it is not so easy. 
Can someone please provide the logic for the order of items on the list. 
In my opinion several logics are viable: Alfabetic by place. Geographical (lathough hard for someone not familiar with France). Order on one of the 4 main routes from start towards Spain (this owuld be my favourite, this requires some restructuring on the list, I would suggest along the lines of 'On the via Turonensis.....' 'On the way of Le Puy....' etc.). 
Other suggestion are welcome Arnoutf 13:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Organize
Talk:Suidae

message: Many of the animal names linked from here are capitalized as if they were propper names. Why? -Harmil 13:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (fauna), and Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life#Article titles and common names. Angr (talk • contribs) 16:02, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the caps? 

message: Given the recent DNA analyses showing that cetaceans are related to ungulates (see article Cetartiodactyla), the scientific classification tree of Suidae needs to be updated. Any objections before this is done? Bytor 18:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phylogeny 

message: Shouldn't they be added to the list, just to be informative? Just a question/suggestion.
Eriorguez 12:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some, but unfortunately, I don't have a comprehensive list. (Which would be quite long, incidentally - there are probably at least six subfamilies!)Anaxial (talk) 13:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinct Subfamilies/Genus/Species/Subspecies 

message: sue + ee + day?  sue + ee + die?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.156.66.151 (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's the former.  Thank you for pointing out this problem with the article. Chrisrus (talk) 16:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation? 

message: There are discussions in progress on Talk:Pig (disambiguation) and Talk:Pig which affect this page.  Please participate there (not here).  Thank you. 69.3.72.249 (talk) 20:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pig disambiguation 

message: The article Suinae needs help. Chrisrus (talk) 17:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Working off the taxa list placed on Suinae, I have reorganized the list here to reflect as much as I could find on subfamilies, tribes, and species for the taxa list here. --Kevmin § 01:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much! Chrisrus (talk) 03:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suinae?
Talk:Jigsaw (British band)

message: One quick listen to the Jigsaw recording of Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring will remove all doubt that the Apollo 100 remake version release 2 years later is a nearly identical copy of the same arrangement.  Very surprising that the Jigsaw fans who wrote this page appear not to know this.  Is it because the remake was only a hit in the U.S?  If you still don't believe that Apollo 100 stole the arrangement download the original 1970 Jigsaw recording here:
http://robotsforronnie.blogspot.com/2007/06/jigsaw-letherslade-farm-1970.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.160.93.32 (talk) 09:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Arrangement of ''Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring''

message: The word "eponymous" is so often used incorrectly that it is better to leave it out. This article refers to an album released by Jigsaw that is named for the band and is thus itself called Jigsaw. The article reads "eponymous Jigsaw.
This is incorrect. It is not the album that is eponymous, rather the band. Something is eponymous if it has something else named for it - not the other way around. As the article reads, it suggests that the band was named after the album.
True, the use of this word is almost universally incorrect. (Same with the word "peruse". It's used in a manner completely opposite to its true meaning.) However, as many people outside the English-speaking world (myself included) rely on Wikipedia, among other things, as a guide to the correct usage of English, errant use of words should be avoided as much as possible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.65.159.153 (talk) 08:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "eponymous"? 

message: According to the few sources I can find, Bullets La Verne is a song by Dr. West's Medicine Band. (source: https://www.discogs.com/Dr-Wests-Medicine-Band-Bullets-La-Verne/release/6650894) 'Jigsaw' is the name of the b-side it's attached to, which may have led to the confusion. I don't think that this is an actual song made by Jigsaw at any point. Unless someone else has any other record of this song existing, I think it should be removed from the page.
HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith (talk) 02:55, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. West's Medicine Band c/w Bullets La Verne doesn't seem to be an actual Jigsaw song.
Talk:Van Deemter equation

message: For those who are interested and have time: the german wikipedia has a good page about the Van Deemster equation.
The Van Deemter equation is highly used in HPLC to improve effiicency.  I'll try to clean up the article, I think there's something on this at my website 
-PaulHurleyuk 10:05, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The way this article depicts the van Deemter figure is wrong.  It confuses the longitudinal diffusion piece (B/u) with the resulting sum of all the terms.  As soon as I figure out how to edit stuff in this language I'll try to fix that.
Alex Y
Alex is correct, though I can't edit the figure either. The actual sum of all terms is not shown on the graph, but would be higher than all of three lines (since it is their sum).
99.231.189.25 (talk) 03:09, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  van Deemter plot figure is wrong
Talk:Edmund Fowler

message: I just removed this from the article:
This page has been migrated from the http://www.victoriacross.net Victoria Cross Reference with permission.
--Fuzzie (talk) 13:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Quasit

message: I disagree with the intent to merge this with the Dungeons & Dragons article.  That article does not have information about the various monsters and races appearing within the game.  If the quasit is to be introduced, then all — or at least a representative sample of all — monsters must also be introduced.  This just sounds like a bad, space-wasting idea.  Best to leave it alone. Canonblack 13:23, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Having recently started a List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters, I am trying to determine which monster articles should be redirected into the lists.  I believe this article may be a suitable candidate to be merged and redirected into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, as that is when it first debuted in the Dungeons & Dragons game.  Please discuss reasons for or against such a merge.  If no discussion has taken place 5 days from now, I will redirect this article to that list; otherwise I will follow whatever discussion takes place here.  Thank you!  :) BOZ (talk) 03:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Jason Dohring

message: There are huge rumours that Jason is second generation of scientologists and his wife is scientologist too. Unfortunately I haven't find any reliable resources. If smb find - it could help.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.6.172.33 (talk) 10:27, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw him in an ad for scientology and was surprised to not find it listed in his biography. Its a pretty well established fact. Juno (talk) 13:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientology 
Talk:Catholic unionist

message: For information on the dispute, see Talk:Northern Ireland. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 05:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Kevin Myers is, for all his other sins, not a Unionist. Yes, he was born in England, but he wrote in the Sunday Telegraph about why he chose to be Irish, and in the Irish Times, he described the Scots and Welsh as being like people who complain about their parents but still go home to them. Quiensabe 00:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kevin Myers

message: It says this fellow was born to Irish catholic parents. However, the article on Hacketts Junior's father says that Hackett Senior, while born in Dublin, was a prominant member of the Church of England.
Sounds to me like a case of 2+2=5, along the lines of, "Hackett's parents were Irish; Irish are Catholic; therefore Hackett was Catholic". In fact I can't see any indication that he was. As you say, Hackett snr was an Anglican; and Hackett jnr was at Geelong GS, which certainly is not a Catholic school. Bill Tegner 22:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tend to agree - would support the removal of info Weggie 22:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General Sir John Winthrop Hackett

message: Inserted for balance. While not living in Ireland some cultural aspects have carried on. Considering also the European Union, describing anyone as a "Catholic Unionist" is likely to become meaningless as time passes.86.42.197.84 (talk) 09:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish-origin in Britain

message: I have removed the reference to the dup and and Orange Order as the Orange order is UUP C. 22468 (talk) 01:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orange Order and Dup 

message: As the article itself explicitly says that the Alliance party is not unionist, why is it mentioned here?  From their own website http://allianceparty.org/
"We are Northern Ireland's cross-community party"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.103.140.3 (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Alliance?
Talk:Lodsworth

message: Hold on! Lodsworth is as noteworthy a village as any, with much history and some noteable past residents. It just needs more work. By all means delete the pub link but please not the whole page.(User:Charlesdrakew 12:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Bexleyhill to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 14:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:St. Mary's High School (Kitchener)

message: Does this school have any notable alumni?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.75.190.252 (talk) 05:03, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni 

message: "St. Mary's isn't just known for their sports teams. Their arts department offers many creative and talented students. " 
This and many other parts of this article are terribly unencyclopedic. It's a good thing no one but former and current alumni (myself included, I hated it there and left for KCI) will ever read this article.
67.158.70.187 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 11:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: = unencyclopedic 

message: Sorry, I accidentally deleted parts of the page, I meant to be editing another page. It wasn't Wikipedia:vandalism it was an accident.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3193th (talk • contribs) 20:38, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  sorry
Talk:Ginyu Force

message: The Ginyu Force are tertiary characters. Many secondary and tertiary characters have already been merged, so following the same consensus, the Ginyu should be merged to maintain the same structure. They shouldn't have their own page. They should be on the aliens page just as all the other characters. - 69.86.243.244
yes, i am for the merger. there's no reason to keep a separate article if everyone else has already been merged into that page. - 149.68.165.194 17:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance - Merging 

message: Why was this page moved to Gi'nyu Special Corps.? According to WP:NAME, this should be the name that people actually use to search for it, as well as other reasons. I understand the "correctness" os the Romaji titles, but it's really not correct as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Google only finds *69* hits for this title, but 26,000 hits for "Ginyu Special Corps". Please don't unilaterally rename articles. JRP 13:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ginyu Force gets 169,000 hits and appears to be the most common English name for the character group. I've renamed it appropiately. (This is the same name as before, thankfully.) JRP 13:53, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: This is incorrect; both Gurd and Batta are killed by Vegeta prior to Reacoom. Reacoon is defeated second, though. - Kooshmeister
:So why talk about it here instead of correcting it? Not to be insulting, but it seems pointless to bring it up in conversation when a simple edit would have sufficed. Instead it sat there still wrong for another week. Voice of Treason 20:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reacoom dies second chronologically...? 

message: Jeice uses a paralyzing attack on Goku while the Saiyan is facing Ginyu.
I once listed it simply as "paralysis", but that's not the correct name, and I guess that's why it was removed.
In the first French translation of the manga, it was called "Technique of Total Inaction", but I don't know if it was correct because this edition contained a lot of errors.
Anyway, if someone knows the right name of this move, we could add it to Jeice's list.
Hugo duvergey 11:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeice's paralyzing attack
Talk:Big Thompson River

message: more than 600 never accounted for in the small town of Estes Park.
No no no no.  This is doubly incorrect — the number unaccounted for is 6, not 600 , and the thunderstorm, and the entire flood, took place east and downstream from Estes Park. --Dcfleck 14:02, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed; the only severe flooding that Estes Park has experienced in a long time was the failure of the Lawn Lake Dam, which did a lot of property damage but killed nobody in town. Merenta 21:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Scuttlebutt

message: This article should be about Hoisting the scuttlebutt. The introductory paragraph is merely a dictionary etymology and should be siphoned off to Wiktionary. __meco (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent article 
Talk:Whitewall tire

message: No, the article should NOT be merged with "tire". Whitewall tyres had a stylistic purpose, not a technical one, this article belongs to the 
"Category:Automotive styling features".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randroide (talk • contribs) 
: I've removed the  link, as I think it's unlikely the article will/should be merged, for various reasons.  In terms of length, this article is longer than a stub; the tire article is already long enough (near the suggested 32k limit); and there are several specific tires already broken out (see :Category:Tires).  Also, the merge tag has been in place for almost a year with nobody merging it, and there are several links to this specific article that would be useful to maintain.  --Interiot 23:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:The Harvest (audio drama)

message: There are currently three other uses linked from the top of this page, and I'm not convinced that the Doctor Who audio play is significantly more notable than the others.  Should we move this to The Harvest (Doctor Who audio), and turn The Harvest into a disambiguation page? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 15:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig?
Talk:Will Vandom

message: fixed a mispelling --Xiaou 14:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Just a quick note to remind people that Kandrakar is the primary spelling used in WITCH. Candracar was a later localization made by Walt Disney Co when they first introduced WITCH. It represents the exception and not the rule.
perfectblue 08:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Will is listed as being born in the fall, but being a Capricorn (December to January).  Is this an inconsistency in the animated series, or did someone make a mistake? Reyemile (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Will's birthday in the animated series

message: Ok, someone might have eddited it by now, but the comic came BEFORE the show, so please change that.
Witch was an italian comic book, before it was turned into a TV show by someone in France.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitual aelita (talk • contribs) 11:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please change this!
Talk:The Next Life (audio drama)

message: "Although he has continued in the role, this is the final audio drama to feature Paul McGann as the current Doctor. The next Eighth Doctor audio drama, Terror Firma, was released in August 2005 by which time he had been succeeded in the role of the Doctor on television by not only Christopher Eccleston but also David Tennant."
The above entry makes little sense and is largely redundant. Neither David Tennant nor Matt Smith were replacing McGann, so their names don't need mentioning. Likewise, seeing as how Paul McGann is both still portraying the role and the most recent Doctor to be featuring in an audio drama, it can hardly be seen as the "final" one. Also note that in any incarnation of the Doctor, he's always the current one (except for multiple-Doctor stories where it is subjective). I propose changing it to the following"
"Between this and the next Eighth Doctor audio drama, Terror Firma, the Doctor Who television series would be relaunched featuring Christopher Eccleston as the nearly regenerated 9th Doctor. Though he continues as the 8th Doctor, Paul McGann would no longer be the most recent."
...even then, the second sentence may not be necessary.--68.111.242.170 (talk) 02:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs rewording
Talk:CIRUS reactor

message: Dear Madam, / Dear Sir;
The CIRUS research (and plutonium producing) reactor that Canada supplied to India under the 1955 Colombo Plan is NOT the Canada-India Reactor United States. The letters U and S do NOT stand for United States. This is a long held misconception by some of our American cousins.
The reactor was named the Canada - India Reactor (CIR) and yes the United States supplied the heavy water for the moderator system. The reactor was renamed the CIRUS reactor by the Indian Government. Dr Homi Sethna, who had been appointed to succeed Dr. Homi Bhabha (who died in an airplance crash) as Director of the Trombay Nuclear Research Centre (later renamed the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, BARC)presided at the meeting in December 1965 when the name CIRUS was adopted.He stated that CIRUS was the abbreviation for Canada India Reactor Uranium System. He also mentioned that CIRUS was chosen in memory of CYRUS, the shah of ancient Persia.  
From the outset of negotiations between Canada and India leading up to the decision to proceed with the CIR project the Indian authorities were very unwilling to accept IAEA safeguards on the reactor. Instead a system of bilateral safeguards was incoprporated into the Canada - India Nuclear Cooperation Agreement. 
I performed the first and only safeguards inspection at CIR in July 1968 with my colleague John McManus. Our report to the Canadian Government cited the unexplained premature removal of fuel rods from CIR. We suspected that the Indians wished to ensure that the plutonium extracted from these rods contained only trace quantities of Pu 240.
Jon Jennekens (former peacekeeper (Korea), former nuclear operations engineer at NRX, former staff member and President of the Atomic Energy Control Board and former Deputy Director General (Safeguards) International Atomic Energy Agency.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonorah (talk • contribs) 11 March, 2006
:Thanks for pointing out the error in the name, the article has been corrected. KhaasBanda (talk) 07:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This makes more sense.  Is there a good source for this?  The best I could find is this . NPguy (talk) 14:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: How about this reference? http://fissilematerials.org/library/sag59.pdf Is that a reliable source? KhaasBanda (talk) 08:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Where does it define CIRUS?  I see many references to CIR, but didn't find any for CIRUS. NPguy (talk) 02:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "US" misconception

message: Article says "It is the second oldest reactor in India". Which was the first? Jay (talk) 12:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Apsara reactor was the first reactor in India, see the BARC page http://www.barc.gov.in/reactor/index.html KhaasBanda (talk) 07:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Which was the first?