lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bilice, Šibenik-Knin County

message: According to the 2001 population census, this is not a municipality.
: True. It appears to be just a settlement within the city of Šibenik, as indicated by the  data.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  On the other hand, the government  says it is a municipality and the municipality  specifies December 17, 2002 as the day the municipality was founded. The latter explains why there's no such municipality specified by the 2001 census.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Municipality???
Talk:M. Carey Thomas

message: How 154.117.216.151 (talk) 12:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life of the students on campus
Talk:GENESIS (software)

message: GENESIS is not a product, but a scientific computing platform which is available free for download and has been so available for 20 years.  The other simulation platform that is comperable to GENESIS is Neuron, which has a page in wikipedia.
the article I just posted also includes a reference to a book published by Springer which is a reference text for the use of GENESIS.
GENESIS has been used as a base for more than 600 peer-reviewed scientific publications, and the GENESIS users group has members in 700 universities around the world.  
the most important point, however, is that this is not a product for sale, but a software platform supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.
GENESIS also has historical significance as a software package as indicated in the article.
Neurocompute 03:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article lists one book and one external link, but it doesn't make it clear which is used for each of the individual statements made, which is why I've tagged it for footnotes. A proper reference section with footnotes would be nice.
I've also done some cleanup and removed that tag. Olaf Davis | Talk 15:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: There should be something, preferably in the Intro, that explicitly states that GENESIS models biological systems, rather than being a tool for developing artificial neural networks.  BMJ-pdx (talk) 13:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biologically oriented, not artificial
Talk:Batsakis v. Demotsis

message: This page needs work.  For starters, the last sentence is 116 words long.  
"The Court of Appeals reasoned that the consideration given by Demotsis for Batsakis's promise of 500,000 drachmae could not be considered inadequate under state law as she had received "exactly what she contracted for" and the appellate court found the consideration legally sufficient and went on to state that the adequacy or inadequacy of the consideration did not bear on the enforceability as mere inadequacy of consideration will not void a contract noting that in common law systems including the American system courts generally review the legal sufficiency of the consideration in a contract but have historically refused ordinarily to inquire into the adequacy of the consideration whether the transaction was generally a fair or equivalent exchange."
This is bad grammar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jblaufeld (talk • contribs) 20:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Live Earth concert, New Jersey

message: Could somebody please change New York to New Jersey? The concert was in New Jersey, not New York. 68.192.8.228 21:54, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concert Location 

message: should be renamed to playlist, as it does not explain what "Live Earth" is  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.49.81 (talk) 20:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  great job 
Talk:Edutopia

message: This reads like a press release - Needs significant rewrite.
KConWiki 03:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - I removed the tags - I think the article (though much slimmer) is better off w/o the stuff that was in it at the time I made the above statement. Also, NYT, CNN, etc. should cover the references question. KConWiki (talk) 05:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Municipal law

message: This section appears to have little if anything to do with municipal law. But instead jurisprudence question on the nature of law. Municipal law is just a term used by international lawyers to describe law which isn't international law. Lets not get to the meaning of the law, life universe etc.. Blue-Haired Lawyer 10:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on "Early modern English versus American views" 

message: I think it needs to be mentioned that traditionally international law bound states (not individuals), and that municipal law regulated the relationship between subjects/citizens within a state and between the subject/citizen and the state. To accommodate state obligations under international law, states have often constructed a municipal law that automatically incorporates those international obligations into domestic law, an example of which is the "Supremacy Clause" in the United States Constitution. --PBS (talk) 09:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Monists on the other hand see a single legal system and would argue that the "Supremacy Clause" is just the acknowledgement of otherwise pre-existing legal obligations to give effect to international law. -Blue-Haired Lawyer 14:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never heard of monist legal movement, but granting there there are some who would argue for the single legal system, I believe Philip is correct in his statement as far he refers to traditionally, which I'm taking to mean pre-WWII.  166.122.98.137 (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The traditional common law point of view was certainly dualist, but monism is older. See: . — Blue-Haired Lawyer 22:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Supremacy Clause
Talk:Song Xu

message: Iwanafish On your user talk page a section Warning regarding removal of maintenance templates has been placed due to multiple incidents. These templates should only be removed after discusion and resolution on the article's discussion or talk page.
Enfermero (talk) 18:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

message: This article uses stub class yet was rated B class?  That is not right. Changed back to stub class. Enfermero (talk) 18:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Devon Nicholson

message: This article should look like other pro-wrestler articles.
The wrestling heels job is to create heat, that shouldn't reflect in the structure of the article. 
Warisart (talk) 16:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organizational clean up 

message: A certain IP range (2607:FEA8:BEA0:7DD:0:0:0:0/64) which traces to Ontario, Canada, has been adding unsourced information about Nicholson's wife , correcting Nicholson's height  (both of which turns out to be correct according to sources I found), removing the "Blood Hunter" character from the article , and removing all information about the referee stabbing incident . All very strange. starship.paint (exalt) 07:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP edits
Talk:Complexometric indicator

message: The prose banner is probably wrong here, as a list (or table) is much easier to read, that is, if there were content to it. It would be much less awful if the many items which are red and/or lack examples were improved/removed. --Belg4mit (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: Give some name of complexometric indicators? 2405:204:5403:65B1:9996:6DCF:3079:33E (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmaceutical analysis
Talk:Billy the Kid's Old Timey Oddities

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - it is lacking out-of-universe material (publication history. reception, etc.) and references. (Emperor (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
Talk:Ghadames Air Transport

message: What is the protocol, this very small company has been rebranded under a very close name. Should we change the title from Ghadames Air transport to Ghadames air... and put a redirecting link from the previous page?
Sorry if question is dumb, I don't know what to do or how
DrRachT (talk) 23:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we change the page title?
Talk:Colossus of Nero

message: "Many experts believe that the name for the Colosseum is derived from this monument." Good heavens, what do the rest "believe"? --Wetman 04:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Colosseum

message: The link to Zenodorus takes us to a genus of jumping spiders. Would suggest this be unlinked.Godingo 22:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Link 

message: Do any images or descriptions exist? Drutt (talk) 06:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Even the exact siting is mooted.--Wetman (talk) 08:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are images on first century coins, search for "Coins Nero Colossus". Blueshifter (talk) 23:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Brought in more info from the Colosseum article and the Domus Aurea article, plus a review on current research. Added TOC.  For an image, this would be nice, but I couldn't find the source of the illustration to ask for permission:
http://onchong.blogspot.com/2009/07/trivia-colosseum.html
Blueshifter (talk) 23:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job!--Wetman (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote Article 

message: At one point in this article it states that the statue was probably lost in the 5th century, while it seems that Bede wrote something seeming to say that the statue was still standing when he wrote it (in the 8th century). Could someone explain this to me? 174.108.55.15 (talk) 23:05, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion on the time when the statue fell 

message: List of statues (section destroyed) claims height was 36 m. 85.217.38.115 (talk) 07:49, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be good to note that the scale of the statue was probably similar to the Statue of Liberty. Liberty is taller, but mostly because she has her arm raised. Fig (talk) 12:06, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 
Talk:Pomona High School (Pomona, California)

message: Where are these reviews coming from? Is this original research, or is there a source? If there is a source, show it; these reviews seem very unencyclopedic. --Lapse29 04:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  School reviews 

message: It'd be good to have a section on the history of the school. Example: the orginal Pomona High School was on Holt Avenue until a teacher set it on fire. Eeekster (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: He is coinventor of the koosh ball. Sold his company to Hasbro for $100 million. He should be on the notable alumni list class of 1974 2600:1012:B18B:FB42:43F2:A909:857F:4DD8 (talk) 15:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Button
Talk:Manhattan (song)

message: Does anyone understand the way that Dinah Washington sang the "My Fair Lady" verse?201.8.27.181 04:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "inventive rhymes" you cite aren't rhymes at all.  Hart knew this.  It's ironic; he intentionally did it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.140.179.240 (talk) 19:32, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventive  Rhymes 

message: Why is there a Bette Midler discography at the foot of the "Manhattan" (song) article? Wouldn't something about Rogers and Hart be more apropos? -- 96.245.109.133 (talk) 00:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bette Midler? 

message: I don't go back to the Rodgers and Hart era; I was born in 1947. I don't think the Bronx zoo has ever been free during my lifetime, and I would like to see a reference validating the assertion in the article. Peter S. Shenkin (talk) 17:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bronx Zoo is not free 

message: Versions section, last sentence: 'For many years during the 1960s and 1970s, radio station WABC-AM used the notes from the "We'll take Manhattan" lyric'
There is no such lyric. The words are: We'll turn Manhattan into an isle of joy. https://genius.com/Rodgers-and-hart-manhattan-lyrics I am correcting the article accordingly. Robert P Connolly (talk) 14:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'We'll take Manhattan...'
Talk:Deva Stadium

message: The capacity isnt 6012 anymore, its less due to stricter safety regualtions and changing the away end from all standing to all seating.
Srw985 17:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Capacity

message: Where does the name Deva come from? Daemonic Kangaroo 04:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Deva Victrix. -- Arwel (talk) 14:04, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Looking at a really large-scale map (http://www.geograph.org.uk/showmap.php?gridref=SJ383662 and zoom in to maximum) it appears that the border barely skims one corner of the office structure on the north side of the stadium, putting virtually all the stadium in Wales, although the entrance is in England. 80.254.147.36 (talk) 15:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is entirely in Wales. The border lies outside both the pitch and the stadium buildings, just skimming along the edge of the office building. Argovian (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really straddling the border? 
Talk:Nunatak (band)

message: These guys were great!  My husband and I had the TV on just waiting for them to come on.  When he stepped outside for a bit to talk to neighbors they came on and so I hollered "It's those Antarctica dudes now!" everyone in earshot ran inside to listen.  I have one question though about the footage of the penguins - did they pay for their tickets or were they let in for free seeing as they are a threatened species?LiPollis 04:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Encore!  Encore!

message: what's the name of the disease? this is wikipedia, we're allowed to say dirty words when it's significant.  Amirman 15:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may watch the german version of the article.--NSX-Racer 01:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's written in english in the german article: Rat shit death.--NSX-Racer 12:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disease Name?

message: The result was no merge. --Paul Erik 05:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: Sadly it looks like the original website is gone, and now redirects to the main page of British Antarctic Survey. 2.123.22.149 (talk) 10:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website link redirect
Talk:Wampee

message: I have classified this article as a stub  It needs to be expanded to look more at wampees and their cultivation. Capitalistroadster 04:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification
Talk:Seaboard World Airlines Flight 253A

message: Maybe we should clarify:
:In December 1968 Seaboard was forced to pay a $5,000 civil penalty to the Federal Aviation Administration, as its onboard Doppler radar was not properly certified.
..that Doppler RADAR is only for detecting precipitation, and is not used for navigation, and is thus unrelated to this incident. - Eric (talk) 00:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doppler Radar
Talk:South Medford, Massachusetts

message: My edit on 20:48, 7 July 2007 was an accident, I apologize.  It has since been fixed.
stateful 04:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edit on 20:48, 7 July 2007 

message: Come on!  A few blocks in a marginally notable town?  Please!   This article has been untouched since 2008.  The whole thing has about three edits in it's history.  Nobody seems to care.  That is, it's UNNOTABLE!  Somebody wanted to see their neighborhood on Wikipedia.  Is that a "coatrack"?.  It's something like that.  This article must go.  I WILL DELETE IT SOON.
108.7.6.40 (talk) 22:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  UTTERLY UNNOTABLE  -- DELETE THIS ARTICLE 

message: It's been five months with no complaints to not delete.  There's been essentially no activity at all.  I will delete when I figure out how.
See Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create item number 4.
Also see Wikipedia:List of bad article ideas and the "see also" links in that article.
108.7.1.88 (talk) 05:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  After five months, no complaints, not a peep, WILL DELETE ''with cause''.
Talk:Country Weekly

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nash Country Weekly →  – A quick search seems to suggest that this magazine is more commonly referred to as Country Weekly without the Nash branding. It was moved when the magazine was still active and published under the Nash Country Weekly name, but now that it's defunct, it seems to be retroactively remembered more without "Nash" in front of it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 January 2023
Talk:Social constructivism (learning theory)

message: I find it somewhat confusing to have two articles with very similar names addressing very different issues related to Constructivism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructivism_(learning_theory)
which does not deal with Vygotskian issues and 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_constructivism_%28learning_theory%29&direction=prev&oldid=193815804
which does deal with Vygotskian issues.
Please could I support the idea that a a disambiguation page be created which will highlight the differences to those people who, like me, are not expert sociologists. 
It would also be useful to be able to track down the dominant author of this article in order to supply correct references for a paper which I am involved with.
At the moment I am referencing this article as follows:Yasnitsky, Anton, et al, 2007,   http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_constructivism_%28learning_theory%29&direction=prev&oldid=193815804
Thanks! Ptpare (talk) 15:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

message: I've removed massive amounts of copyright violations from this article.  Some were copied from other Wikipedia articles without notice (original revision), which violates the GFDL (Cmsmith81: please don't duplicate content on Wikipedia!); others were copied (perhaps indirectly through other offending Wikipedia articles) from web pages and papers, such as  or .  -- Lea (talk) 00:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvios 

message: After removing the copyvios, only a sub-stub is left.  Notability is not asserted (and was not asserted before removing the copyvios), in particular not as a lemma distinct from social constructivism.  I'm therefore redirecting this to social constructivism.  If you want to recreate this article, please make sure you establish notability per WP:N, and please do not copy any text.  Moving (and very limited copying) of text from other Wikipedia articles can be sensible, but each individual move must described in the edit summary both at the source and the destination article, to meet the requirements of the GFDL. -- Lea (talk) 00:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If Constructivism (learning theory) is the more appropriate redirect target, please feel free to change the redirect. -- Lea (talk) 00:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:G.ho.st

message: Do not delete this article - it was previously incorrectly deleted and this was overturned by a Deletion Review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:DRV#28_June_2007.  Notability has been established. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.65.228.49 (talk • contribs) 
:Notability can be questioned at any time. This article will only be deleted if consensus is established at the AfD - if not, it will remain. Ian¹³/t 15:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This exact subject is what is being debated. Please see the AfD linked from the main article. Ian¹³/t 20:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gastralia

message: Hmmm... this indicates gastralia have also been found in primitive ornithischian dinosaurs, too. Worth a mention, or has this been debunked? Firsfron of Ronchester 05:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was debunked in Claessens, 2004, but it's worth a mention. J. Spencer 14:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Gastralium →  – Even though a single element of the gastral basket is indeed called a gastralium, the bones being collectively referred to as gastralia is far more common than mention of a single gastralium, and this article is largely written to refer to the gastralia as a collective entity. Google Scholar gets 150 results for "gastralium" and 2,260 results for "gastralia", so use in the plural is more than an order of magnitude more common than the singular. "Gastralium" gets 5020 hits on Google (many of which are Wikipedia and its mirrors) and "gastralia" 44,200, providing nearly as high a ratio. Neither of the vertebrate anatomy textbooks I have ever use the singular form at all.  Other than the title and lead sentence, this article itself uses "gastralia" thirteen times and "gastralium" only once, further emphasizing the rarity of use in the singular. According to WP:PLURAL, while singular article titles are generally preferred, there are noted exceptions, and I think this is a case where an exception is appropriate. Article titles listed in the exceptions such as Skew coordinates, where the article is on a system more so than the items individually, and Bacteria and Algae, where plural usage far exceeds the singular, provide appropriate precedent. "Gastralia" is clearly the most common name for the subject of the article by a wide margin, and should be favored. Ornithopsis (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 March 2022
Talk:Barb (fish)

message: Unless someone objects, I'm moving this page to Barb (fish) in a few days, for two reasons:
:1. "Barb" refers to a genus, not necessarily any particular "species".
:2. Doing so would match the style of such pages as Flying fox (fish).
--Vlmastra 01:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Move