Talk:East German uprising of 1953

message: From the current version:
Radio in the American Sector directed many of the demonstrations, deciding when and where they would be held, and broadcasting instructions in German.
That statement is POV of the then East German government. It attempts to portray the uprising as staged by western forces. I'm not aware of an independent source that confirms the RIAS "instructions" about where and when to hold demonstrations.
Meanwhile western sources do confirm that RIAS played a role in the uprising akin to a catalyst, by the sheer fact that it reported about the uprising in Berlin and thus helped spark the uprising in other parts of East Germany which had remained quiet until then. But that role was rather involuntary and did not involve instructions, but merely reports. Anorak2 06:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed RIAS instructions 

message: there are currently two statements in the article that seem a bit troubling: one is the vague statement about a massacre (where is it supposed to have happened? Berlin has a number of squares, but most of these have a proper name), the other one abou 401 people killed, including many tourists and journalists (why did I never hear about this)? The Bundeszentrale fuer politische Bildung has a site dedicated to the events, maybe it would be possible to gather some info there? 
Generally, I think the article focuses too much on Berlin. Much of the action happened there, but there were numerous (and also often violent) demonstrations in other cities. Yaan (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I found the sources - but there is still much to do, like: Who got violent first, VP/Soviets or the demonstrators? When was the decision to quell protests made, and by whom?
The numbers of people killed are obviously too high. Recent German research (see footnote 6) has shown that only 55 victims can be accounted for. The rest is speculation and/or exaggeration. Some of it deriving from a source that has proven to be incorrect. Therefore, especially the number in the overwiew box at the top should be changed. The passage in the article itself could remain the way it is since it mentions the contradicting numbers. But having a significantly higher number of victims in the overwiew.... To me that reeks of Cold War propaganda and does not fulfill the quality standards Wikipedia is aiming for.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.113.171.44 (talk) 08:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  massacre/number of people killed 

message: Can someone please remove the NPOV wording in June 17 (and, to a lesser extent, the rest of the article)? Thanks. 68.121.24.4 (talk) 23:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we want to keep WP:NPOV. -- Matthead  Discuß   00:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 17 

message: Why isn't the shady position of the Western Allies towards the uprising mentioned? 
They refused to transport the mayor of Western Berlin, Ernst Reuter, in an allied planr from Vienna, where he attended a conference, so he could have been in (Western)Berlin without having to drive for a long time through the Federal Republic of Germany to reach a transit way, which was the only possibility to get there without allied help? 
:What about the position of Mr. Churchhill? He claimed this to be some sort of a "trick" from either the Soviet Union or the GDR! --Ragoro (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Western Allies 

message: At the current the article says "In remembrance of it, June 17 used to be the national holiday of West Germany until reunification", the wording of which doesn't seem correct to me. This day was not a national holiday (Feiertag, litterally: festive day), but intentionelly called a national memorial day (Gedenktag). The interpretation of June 17, 1953 was not how nice a day this was where East Germans have proven that they don't like the communist system, but a memorial day as Germans should be reminded that East Germans do not live in freedom and are hindered by force to vote for the political system/parties they want. Moreover (according to my knowledge), this day was not a day of closed business in Western Germany ("bank holiday"), but has always been a regular labour day. --Payton M. (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: no it was a real holiday (see German Unity Day, see www.17juli1953.de - Law paragraph establishing July 3rd, 1953, as the "Day of German Unity" in West Germany. )14:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  <minor edit> made ref an inline. WillemienH (talk) 10:23, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Holiday 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://books.google.com.au/books?id=j_ci_N3-vAUC&dq=%22Within+an+hour%2C+Soviet+troops+had+cleared+and+isolated+the+area+around+the+government+headquarters%22&q=house+of+unity#v=snippet&q=%22house%20of%20unity%22&f=false. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 11:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I was wondering, given that this was all before the Berlin wall (built 1961) and the closing of the Inner German border (1952?) Why did not many people just seek refuge in West Berlin/ West Germany?WillemienH (talk) 22:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  wondering this was before the Berlin wall and the closing of the Inner German border 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Uprising of 1953 in East Germany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.alphaville.info/main.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060218033842/http://www.ib.hu-berlin.de/~pbruhn/juni1953.htm to http://www.ib.hu-berlin.de/~pbruhn/juni1953.htm
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6FcerDPyL?url=http://www.ib.hu-berlin.de/~pbruhn/juniaugb.htm to http://www.ib.hu-berlin.de/~pbruhn/juniaugb.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: About the sentence: 
"Meanwhile, food prices rose as a result of both the effects of the state's collectivisation policy – 40% of the wealthier farmers in the GDR fled to the West, leaving over 750,000 hectares of otherwise productive land lying fallow – and a poor harvest in 1952." 
Without a specification of this class of "wealthier farmers", the 40% does not say a lot.
The reference (Kopstein) does not clarify this number, but refers to another source: Stiftung Archiv Massen- und Parteiorganisationen, Bundesarchiv (SAMPO-BA), SED IV 2/602/85.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siuhtlev ahsim (talk • contribs) 00:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  40% of the wealthier farmers in the GDR fled to the West? 

message: An IP added the sentences: "There were Nazi elements involved in the protests, though seldom as ringleaders. Walls, bridges and school blackboards were defaced with Nazi slogans and swastikas, and in some places, Nazi songs were sung at demonstrations. The great significant majority of Germans still clung to ideas of Nazism" I contradict this amendment. It is poorly sourced and according to all historian not a significant element of the uprising. Nillurcheier (talk) 10:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nazi Elements" 

message: — Assignment last updated by Waub (talk) 23:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: European Studies