lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Simpsons/Proposal for managing song lists on Simpsons episodes

message: It wasn't such a good start, spelling 'Simpsons' wrong in the name of the page! --Mortice 23:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm not involved in this Wikiproject, I came here because of a request left at Wikipedia:Categorization.  I am an administrator who has spent the last two years working on categorization policy.  I don't think putting all these songs in categories by Simpsons episode is a good idea.  It will lead to overcategorization.  Being in a Simpsons episode is not a defining characteristic for most of these songs.  That is what categories is for.  I could support a single category for songs that were expressly composed for the Simpsons as that would be a defining characteristic for those songs.  For songs like All Along the Watchtower and the 1812 Overture, being on the Simpsons is essentially trivia.  Categories are not for trivia.  These categories will likely be nominated for deletion shortly after they are created.
You can create lists that function just as well (or better) than having categories.  Lists can have more information than a category can.  You could include the composers, performers, etc...  The list can be linked to any article about the Simpsons episode, or linked in the trivia sections on the song article if the Simpson is mentioned.  There is a bit of support of removing much of this trivia.  If someone doesn't think this information should be linked in a trivia section of an article, than it definitely won't fly as a category.
Thanks for posting a request for an opinion at WP:CAT.  I wish more Wikiprojects did this, as it ultimately saves everyone a great deal of time and effort.  Put that effort into something besides making categories like these. -- Samuel Wantman 01:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankyou very much, that was exactly the sort of insight I've been after for the last few weeks while considering this implementation. I have an alternative plan (using a bot and not categories) which I'll now propose instead --Mortice 20:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The list is a pretty big mess right now. I took a good look and saw a dozen songs I know were never in the show and another 2 dozen that I'm pretty sure weren't. I like the idea of doing it in the style of the guest stars list because it would look pretty organized, but lets hear your proposal on using a bot first... -- Scorpion0422 22:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One advantage of the bot system (see below) is that the data will be on episode pages, so it will be much easier for someone who's just seen the episode to notice an error on the episode page, rather than an entry in a long list on the songs page --Mortice 23:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a good idea
Talk:Advance Party (film series)

message: In some press releases, the concept is referred to as "The Advance Party"; see for example this release from April 2006. I believe that in more recent press releases the concept is called just "Advance Party" so it would seem that the title of the Wikipedia article is okay. However, it should be mentioned that it used to be called "The Advance Party" if we can get clarification on that. --Mathew5000 04:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definite Article? 

message: McKinnon‘s project has progressed "Rounding Up Donkeys" is now on pre-production  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.62.111.10 (talk) 10:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: next movie
Talk:Ar Men

message: this rock is mentioned in Forester's Hornblower and the Hotspur.
108.18.136.147 (talk) 01:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI 

message: Despite the estimated 105 m2 (1,130 sq ft) of rock being
    uncovered at low water, work began in 1867.
Although we seem to understand the problem from the next sentence -- that this is a prohibitively small area to work with -- the average reader, unfamiliar with lighthouse construction, might be confused by this. It should not be necessary to read ahead in order to figure out what is going on. Perhaps the passage could be reworded along the lines of the following: "Despite a very small area of rock being uncovered at low water, a mere 105 m2 (1,130 sq ft), it was decided that the project should commence, and work began in 1867." Toddcs (talk) 02:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passage is somewhat unclear
Talk:Academy of Ancient Music

message: There is an article about the original Academy on the modern Academy website, which mentions Johann Christoph Pepusch, Benjamin Cooke and Samuel Arnold (composer) as directors at various times. I interpret this as referring to directorship of the Academy of Ancient Music and not to that of its rival the Concert of Antient Music. --RichardVeryard 23:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Directors of the original organization

message: If this is based in Cambridge, why does it have an infobox saying it is based in London? Bards (talk) 22:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location?
Talk:Cathay Cineleisure Orchard

message: Most other articles on shopping venues state the total retail floor area (gross leasable area) of the property.  I have spent a good two hours trying to find s source for this information to add to this article, to no avail.  Any help on this would be appreciated.   Worldbook1967 (talk) 22:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information.  
Talk:List of cinemas in Singapore

message: This list was nominated for deletion (and withdrawn). It is in seriously need of cleanup. All the original research needs to be removed (or sourced), there also needs to be a clear list inclusion criteria (in this case there is not). Also all the addresses need to be removed as we're not a directory. Ajf773 (talk) 18:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List dispute
Talk:Fort Siloso

message: Hi,
Is Fort Siloso really from a Filipino word? I would think it would be from a Malay word, or even Indonesian. Filipino influence on a British colony with Chinese, Malays and Indians would see little Filipino influence in the early 20th century I would think Renelllope 13:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Hi, this is an interesting little article. However it does not focus on Fort Siloso itself, which is the article's topic. Can anyone please help improve this article?  Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contents not focused on its subject 

message: I'm rather confused: 
1. In the opening statement above, the Filipino connection to the fort's name is questioned. 
In the article's lede, we have: "Siloso comes from the word 'Seloso', a Filipino word meaning "jealous person." But in the 'History' section: "The word 'Siloso' is derived from a Malayan word meaning rock." 
I'm inclined to agree with Renelllope. As far as I know, Great Britain, as the colonizer, had very little to do with the Philipines; certainly not enough to influence the choosing of words in Singapore. I would say that the Malayan connection seems more likely.
We need a Filipino or Malayan speaker who might be able to get to the bottom of this conundrum.  
2. "The fort was built to defend against sea invasion from the south. However, during World War II the fort's guns were turned 180 degrees inland to defend against the Japanese Army in the west."
From south to west is only 90 degrees (or 270 dgrees if one goes the 'long' way round). 180 degrees would mean that the guns pointed north.
Besides, I always thought that the invading Japanese forces came from the north, down the Malayan peninsula and the guns, facing the wrong way, could not be turned.
RASAM (talk) 21:54, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:Hylotheism

message: a previous reference on this page was website "Webster online" (http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/english/Hy/Hylotheism.html) which lacked this word. the website merriam-webster did show the word, until the link was mentioned here in April. now that page (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hylotheism) was also removed from m.w. can you all reach the definitions? or only at dictionary.com which should show a definition and also mentions Collins English Dictionary. if those are concealed, then trust me that a book for international dictionary has this word. 185.120.124.139 (talk) 09:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been restored FatalSubjectivities (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: definition

message: I doubt a screenshot of the dictionary is permitted, because copyright, although for this rare word which might be moved out of use, a picture would preserve the word as it is currently. 
I will put a link to the picture although I do not know if that is sufficient. 
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1787712618213665&id=100009248324970
so I suggest someone else decide. 185.120.124.139 (talk) 11:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: photo

message: Actually, I don't know where to merge this to. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that Materialism and Christianity is a good target, but Pantheism might be, as synonym; perhaps Hylotheism is synonymous with at least some conceptions of Pantheism. Klbrain (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge to [[Materialism and Christianity]]
Talk:Jinrikisha Station

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.ca/books/about/Singapore_s_100_Historical_Places.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Third Summers brother

message: I'm not sure what would be the best way to incorporate Apocalypse into the article, but he was also a contender at one point to join the family.  Below is a cited statment from Robert Weinberg, Cable writer.
*During his run on Cable, Robert Weinberg actually planned a rather complex series of circumstances that would have revealed that Apocalypse was in fact the Third Summers Brother all along, but Weinberg left the book before he could go along with his plan. 
:That is covered at the very least by the second external link; it could probably be incorporated in at least general outline in the main text, however. Luis Dantas 21:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Add Apocalypse to the article

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: I propose renaming this article "Summers" brothers or just having the sections merged with their respective articles. It's never explained which person that Sinister was referring to and he never said that there was only 3 Summers brothers - there could be more. Thus, while Vulcan is "a" third Summers brother, there is nothing in the text to say that he is in fact "the" Summers brother referred to by Sinester. So, the "third Summers brother" was a misnamed article from the very beginning.--RossF18 (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Just a note for future editors to be aware of: the previous editor to nominate this article for deletion has been blocked as a sockpuppet of another user. Spidey104 14:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sockpuppet nomination for deletion 

message: Acomicbookfan (talk) 07:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  THird Summers brother add Siniste Prime  
Talk:Prinsep Street Presbyterian Church

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore's 100 Historic Places. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 07:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Old Thong Chai Medical Institution

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore's 100 Historic Places. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 08:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Istro-Romanians

message: :HI, ,
:these templates you inserted does not seem work...what they to be meant exactly?(KIENGIR (talk) 17:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. These templates are to replace the use of italics in words or sentences in other languages. I don't see it really necessary but this page was tagged as in need of clean up because of that. The templates are not supposed to show the language, otherwise it would be something like: . Super Ψ Dro 17:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>{{lang|ruo|xxx}}</nowiki> 

message: I immediately recognized headline photo to be wrongly described as the place in the picture isn't Žejane but Trsat (Rijeka). SavoyenCRO (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right about this, the caption has been corrected and I'll correct it on other wikis as well. Super Ψ Dro 00:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information isn't correct 

message: === Third opinion ===
 wants to offer a third opinion. To assist with the process, editors are requested to summarize the dispute in a short sentence below.
; Viewpoint by (name here): ....
; Viewpoint by (name here): ....
; Third opinion by Springnuts (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Overtaken by events.  Conflict solved per above and  Springnuts (talk) 08:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  3O request 

message: wants to offer a third opinion. To assist with the process, editors are requested to summarize the dispute in a short sentence below.
; Viewpoint by (name here): ....
; Viewpoint by (name here): ....
; Third opinion by Springnuts (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Overtaken by events.  Conflict solved per above and  Springnuts (talk) 08:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third opinion
Talk:Ecuadorian centavo coins

message: Took photos of my pocket change and posted here, along with some more information about the currency. The lifted lorax (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They are the US coins, mostly the Sacagawea dollar. --Rodeng (talk) 12:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ferranti-Packard

message: "In 1956 the company received a contract from the Canadian Post Office to develop an electronic mail sorting system, which they delivered later that year. The system used a hard-wired transistorized computer that stored a table of postal codes on a magnetic drum. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_postal_code:
"A report submitted to Canada Post in 1969 recommended adopting a more general "postal code" system, leading to greater feasibility of automated mail sorting in Canada. Canada Post first implemented the new postal code system on a trial basis at the municipal level in Ottawa beginning on April 1, 1971, "
:City-codes were being used as early as the 1940s. These supplanted the "station letters" that were also in widespread use (and are still used in a few cases today). My house was "5 Toronto" for instance. Maury 21:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  postal codes in 56?
Talk:Stanislav Zakharov

message: His name is not "Zakarov" but "Zakharov". --Soregashi (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 
Talk:It Runs in the Family (2003 film)

message: The previous summary was word-for-word from the Internet Movie Database description of this movie. I could not see that the editor who posted it had permission to use it. Following the principle:
"Do not submit copyrighted material without permission.When adding information to articles, make sure it is written in your own words. Remember that all information found on the Internet is copyrighted unless the website specifically states otherwise."
So, I rewrote the summary in my own words. If I am wrong and there is permission, or if the IMDB description is not copyright-protected, my summary could be replaced.JeanColumbia 00:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary
Talk:St Andrew's Cathedral, Singapore

message: The article states that the Cathedral is "reputedly the country's largest cathedral."  ok seriously the country is a mere 272 square miles, how hard is it to know whether or not it's the largest?!  I haven't found any other cathedrals of note in singapore, so i'm removing this word, correct me if i'm wrong. -Jaardon (talk) 20:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reputedly the largest?
Talk:Siong Lim Temple

message: I can contribute references however in doing so I require an COI tag added on this article
 
Rongxiang Lin 07:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References Needed 
Talk:Saint Joseph's Church, Victoria Street

message: This should be a disambiguation page. I'd be surpised if there were'nt at least one thousand Saint Joseph's Churchs around the world [although not all of them will get a Wikipedia article ;-)]. BlankVerse 14:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 
Talk:Seminole Heights

message: should this be updated to reflect that SH has turned into a ghost-town of foreclosures and a cancerous "ghetto" has started spreading?  I would not know how to word it, since i'm not a very good wordsmith. Stregamama (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  not such a pretty art district anymore 

message: The recession has affected everyone, but I have not seen a deterioration of the commercial streets (although they do need attention) and most of the residential areas are holding up well compared to the suburbs.  The neighborhood just held its first open-air vendor market at Hillsborough High School, including local artists.  Tampa Street Market just remodeled their store and re-opened--they build "new" furnishings out of discarded items, something I consider art.  
Shawn dude (talk) 21:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holding up well 

message: It's great that a bunch of people want to keep this false seal alive. Honestly, I think it's funny. It's a colorful part of our history. But it only dates to about 2014. Outside of Wikipedia, tricking people about this is funny.
But on Wikipedia, using faked sources and basing all references off of those is a bit much for a site that's supposed to represent truth. Obviously Wikipedia doesn't represent truth. It'd rather have a bunch of people revert my edits, even though they contain a relevant source.
The seal is said to come from a 1912 Hillsborough High School yearbook. I found said yearbook. It's in the school's library. That seal is nowhere to be found in its pages. However, the pages that were Photoshopped together were. They clearly show that the "seal" didn't exist. And in fact, the person who made the seal changed the name of the company. Maybe that's an intentional clue. I don't know. Either way, that seal isn't in the 1912 Hillsborough High School yearbook.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 4thgenTPA (talk • contribs) 12:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seal