lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chaim Yaakov Goldvicht

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.kby.org/english/history/?id=5 http://www.kby.org/english/history/?id=6. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  BelovedFreak 11:11, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Caucasian Front (militant group)

message: Under "Other notable incidents" you have listed a number battles also listed on the Insurgency pages. How do you distinguish these incidents from the other incidents? - PietervHuis (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should probably mention Islam somewhere in the introduction.--Anthonzi (talk) 06:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islam
Talk:Daklon

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Djmckee1 08:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:John Alan Robinson

message: I don't see why "Robinson's unification algorithm" redirects to a biography page. Would be much more useful if it redirected to "Unification (computer science)". And most useful would be to just remove the entry altogether. There is no article for it then pity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.6.186.77 (talk) 13:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection 

message: The article features two different birth dates. 
46.18.27.35 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date
Talk:Jason Shawn Alexander

message: I've moved the group shows to here. Artist bio's usually only contain significant solo exhibitions. It's an article, not a resume.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Group exhibitions
Talk:J. Andrew McCammon

message: I have removed inaccuracies regarding first MD/MM. I will contact Jorgensen, Warshel and 
McCammon together to figure out how this historical confusion for so many people can be 
alleviated. Although several attempts have been made in the scientific as well as popular literature to make sure the community begins to understand the historical context of this developments, they all seem to have failed. Hence I have not put a new reference here, instead 
I will encourage the scientific organisations related to the publication of these to clarify 
this with much more force. Cormack April 2013  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrcormackjourneyman (talk • contribs) 02:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Prologue

message: * J. Andrew McCammon, Ph.D., Harvard, 1976 (Deutch); postgraduate research, Harvard, 1978 (Karplus).
** John M. Deutch, MIT, 1966.
*** Irwin Oppenheim, Yale, 1956.
**** John Gamble Kirkwood, MIT, 1929.
***** Frederick G. Keyes, Brown, Ph.D. 1909 (John Emery Bucher); postdoc, MIT, 1910 (Louis John Gillespie); postdoc, MIT, 1911 (Noyes – q.v.).
****** Arthur Amos Noyes (moved to Throop College of Technology, 1919; renamed Caltech, 1920), Leipzig 1890. (q.v.)
** Martin Karplus, Caltech, 1953; Nobel Prize (Chemistry), 2013
*** Linus Pauling, Caltech, 1925; Nobel Prize (Chemistry), 1954
**** Roscoe G. Dickinson, Caltech, 1920.
***** Arthur A. Noyes, Leipzig, 1890. (q.v.)
****** Wilhelm Ostwald, Dorpat (now Tartu, Estonia), 1878; Nobel Prize (Chemistry), 1909.
******* Carl Schmidt, Giessen, 1844.
******** Justus von Liebig, Erlangen, 1822.
********* Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac, MA Paris, 1800.
********** Claude Louis Berthollet, Paris, 1778.
*********** Jean-Baptiste-Michel Bucquet, MD Paris, 1770.
************ Guillaume-François Rouelle, Apothecary Paris, 1725.
************* Johann Gottlob Spitzley (1690–1750), Apothecary Paris.
************** Nicolas Lemery, Apothecary Paris ca. 1667.
***************  Christopher Glaser, MD Basel ca. 1640.
– Kaihsu (talk) 13:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professor McCammon’s academic pedigree (genealogy)
Talk:Soviet communications ship SSV-33

message: I removed the section describing the ship as still being afloat. Not only is this information unsourced, it is also clearly wrong.
# The reference picture for the SSV-33, here on Wikipedia as well as on Google, show the radar dome as being infront of the forward mast. The ship on Google Maps has the radar dome behind the forward mast.
# The ship is docked next to a Slava class cruiser. The Slava class is listed as being 186 meters long, and the SSV-33 as being 265 meters long, or roughly 40% longer than the Slava. The ship in the picture clearly isn't 40% longer (in fact Google Earth measures it as 211 meters long)
# On a Google Earth image of the naval facilities of nearby Fokino, dated 23-8-07, as ship bearing much closer resemblance to the SSV-33 can be seen. It looks nothing like the ship alluded to in the removed section.
# On Google Earth the ship mentioned in point 4 can be seen being dismantled on images dated 17-8-10 and 12-10-11 at nearby Bolsjoj Kamen.
# If I had to guess, the ship alluded to is actually the Marshal Krylov, a tracking ship of the Russian navy.
Justthisonceokey (talk) 02:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section 

message: Here on a website:
http://englishrussia.com/2014/02/13/the-biggest-command-ship-in-the-world/#more-138504
--79.202.107.79 (talk) 19:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pics of the ship 

message: Why is this ship classified as a command vessel when, in practice, it's a reconnaissance and missile tracking ship? - 37.190.62.90 (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification 
Talk:J. California Cooper

message: Much of this article appears to be cut and paste from online book sellers as per: , , etc.
Indeed, this site seems to be the source, right down to the "listen to an interview" bit. I'll see what I can do about trimming it down. Bigelectric (talk) 19:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright infringement?

message: — Assignment last updated by Mr.Ek0 (talk) 20:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors African American Literature II
Talk:J. E. R. Staddon

message: I just removed that term, and linked it as we do actually have it linked in Wikipedia  as seen here.  I also removed the word "superstition" as there's no ref stating it should be called that, making it a POV statement. Necromonger...We keep what we kill 20:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a ref that uses that word. However, it is confusing, so I haven't added it. Chamaemelum (talk) 05:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Skinnerian "superstition" 

message: I removed these promotional-looking sections for being unsourced or sourced only to the article subject's own works. I think some useful information could be pulled from them, so I am linking to my removal here so that some information can be retrieved and sourced: diff. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Honors" and "Research" sections
Talk:Amber Mountain fork-marked lemur

message: I would like to suggest the renaming of this page to "Amber Mountain Fork-marked Lemur" (currently a redirect).  If you have an opinion on this matter, please join the discussion, which can be found at WT:PRIMATE. – VisionHolder « talk » 19:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Move completed. – VisionHolder « talk » 01:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename suggested
Template talk:State and Union Territory capitals of India

message: The template lists Atal Nagar/Raipur as the "de-facto" capital of Chhattisgarh. I can't find information regarding this. While there are administrative offices of the state's government situated here, the legislative assembly and other departments of the state still function from Raipur. So not sure how de-facto it is in the sense. Gotitbro (talk) 21:23, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It is probably better to list it as "planned" or something similar. Gotitbro (talk) 21:28, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atal Nagar
Talk:Staff Officer

message: 24.225.152.205 made a contribution on 11:46, 10 March 2007 by adding "S-5" as the unit's "Executive Officer."  However, this is incorrect.  Although every unit at the company level and higher has an executive officer, he or she is not the "S-5".  The S-5 was originally used to refer to a unit's Civil Affairs officer; this practice was phased out after Vietnam and civil affairs officers are no longer routinely assigned to battalion and brigade level staffs.  Later, the unit staff level need for a communications officer resulted in the S-6 position being routinely added to battalion and brigade staffs.  Hence, a unit usually has an S-1, S-2, S-3, S-4, and S-6, but no S-5, and the unit's executive officer is ordinarily referred to as the "XO." See Headquarters and Headquarters Company for more information on a typical US Army staff headquarters unit. -- AzureCitizen 15:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of S-5 (Army)

message: The Staff Noncommissioned Officer article is a stub.  It also deals with a specific type of Staff Officer.  It should be merged with this article.
Neelix (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Geoff NoNick (talk) 14:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree; Staff Officers and Staff NCOs are not a related subject. Staff NCOs are mentioned, like they should be, in the NCO article under United States. --< Nicht Nein! (talk) 18:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. SNCO is USMC, is a specific group of ranks, and may be found doing any assignment consistent with those ranks, while Staff Officer isn't any particular rank or any particular country or service, but is a type of assignment.  They are two different ways of classifying people.  One is not a species of the other, any more than a racehorse is a species of sawhorse or vice versa.  Jim.henderson (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Disagree; A merge would be very confusing. Staff Officer is deserving of a article all on its own. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Staff Noncommissioned Officer]] 

message: Why make bigger?  To duplicate what is already said better in Staff (military)?  Jim.henderson (talk) 02:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion template
Template talk:Maharashtra

message: I have added a <includeonly> tag so that the image shows up only on the Maharashtra page where it is used. A fair-use rationale needs to be added to the image page. Hope this will suffice for the WP:NFCC. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 22:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On a second thought, I have added a logo parameter ("yes" when image needs to show up). This is needed since a fairuse rationale is required for each article that is using the image. I have added a rationale for use on Maharashtra page and added the logo parameter, the same needs to be done for other cities and towns using this template. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 22:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks Ganesh! I agree that the fine-grained control is needed to comply with WP:NFCC requirements. Abecedare 22:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use image 

message: The State of Maharashtra has, categorically so, a second Capital in the city of Nagpur. I am adding the entry. 
Pokedora (talk) 11:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the second capital, but not an administrative second capital. Only winter sessions of Vidhan sabha are held there, but Mantralaya activities always go on in Mumbai. --Redtigerxyz  Talk  13:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nagpur the Second Capital
Talk:Edna Shavit

message: What do the two asterisks in the Hebrew rendering of the name (), added here, signify?  Ping  -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 15:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry , I don't remember adding those, it must have been a typo. I'll delete them. Wodgester (talk) 12:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks; I thought so, but I didn't want to assume. I find the javascript parts of the mediawiki edit interface sometimes load weirdly slowly, and mess around with where the text cursor is - so I've inadvertently started typing (into what turns out to be some random other part of the article) and then not noticed. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 12:41, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two stars in Hebrew rendering of name?
Template talk:Mumbai topics

message: I feel that there is no reason for a separate template to exist just for Mumbai rivers. (See Template:Rivers of Mumbai)
Also, one of the rivers, the Ulhas river is already included in the Mumbai topics template. So I don't understand why the other 4 can't be included in the Geography group as well.Shravan.Iyer (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion for merger of two templates
Talk:J. A. Konrath

message: Konrath published all titles listed as "unpublished" (and a number of others) on Amazon Kindle. See Konrath's author page on Amazon. Is there some reason these "don't count"?  --bonzi (talk) 18:15, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about books published on Kindle? 

message: Why an article on this nobody?  It should be deleted ASAP.  99.248.186.137 (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A bad writer no one's heard of.  Should be deleted.  174.91.4.20 (talk) 01:00, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be deleted 

message: This book about hitchhike serial killers is the only reason I know this author exists.Baltakatei 04:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of 'Serial'
Talk:J. B. Brown

message: If his given name is "James Harold Brown", how did he come to be called "J. B. Brown"? BD2412 T 00:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "J. B."?
Talk:Elena Bashkirova

message: There're no sources indicating that Bashkirova, born in Russian, has ever become, legally, an Argentinian.--Karljoos (talk) 02:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Argentinian? Categories
Talk:Eli Biham

message: This page contains factual errors (April 2019)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.138.139.164 (talk) 08:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page contains factual errors (April 2019)
Talk:Jaan Kaplinski

message: user:Aleksa Lukic user:Sander Säde user:Anna Frodesiak and whatever other sockpuppets you use - I make each of my edits separate so they can be un-done by themselves. There's no need to undo all of them! Change the ones you feel do not improve the article and EXPLAIN THE CHANGES. 24.202.35.184 (talk) 14:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop accusing others of sockpuppetry and be civil - obviously various users disagree with your changes. Also, explain your edits, as you haven't sourced even a single one of them. Use edit summary to explain why you did the changes and why do you think they are needed. --Sander Säde 14:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Information needs to be sourced when it is newly added to an article. Not when you are changing or removing thigs. 24.202.35.184 (talk) 14:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: (ec) And when you remove details from an article without any explanation it is considered to be vandalism. I will revert your edits once more and clean up the article a bit. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia, I recommend you radically change your attitude - and remember that banned users should not edit even anonymously. --Sander Säde 15:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing unsourced content from an article about a living person is in line with Wikipedia policy. Thank you for accusing me of being a previously banned user. The behavior of Wikipedia "regulars" like you is exactly why I have absolutely no desire to ever obtain a Wikipedia account. 24.202.35.184 (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: From your behavior and attitude here, I think that is a win-win situation. --Sander Säde 15:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing unsourced negative content from BLPs is what you are referring to, I'm afraid. And given that you made a ridiculous accusation of sockpuppetry and treated users with whom you disagreed with sarcasm and incivility, you've made it hard for others to communicate civilly with you. But that goes for Sander too: don't raise your temper like that in an issue like this. Biting comments and one-liners belong somewhere else. ALI nom nom 15:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sockpuppet edit war
Talk:Jace Alexander

message: "in which police downloaded child pornography from an IP address". So, the police downloaded the child pornography? The sentence sounds odd. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 03:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward sentence 

message: The intro should have a mention of the fact that Alexander is a convicted child pornography distributor. This NYT piece shows the relevance . My edit was reverted as vandalism. 98.14.96.85 (talk) 00:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As a person who rollbacked your changes, just for a short clarification – your edits were reverted as potentially libelous. It was later confirmed that information you added to the lead is well-resourced, however nothing in your changes could let a reviewer consider this contribution an good-faith edit. Protecting one's reputation is more important than "risking" starting potential discussions on rationals of edits. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 00:52, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  The child pornography conviction should be in the intro, it's a major part of the subject's current notability, as the NYT story indicates. 98.14.96.85 (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro
Talk:William Stanier

message: I'm not entirely convinced that it was Stanier who ended the small engine policy.  I think it had already started to crumble when Fowler introduced the LMS 7F 0-8-0 in 1929. 82.21.65.109 15:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The 7F was something of an exception. Fowler continued to build the 2P and 4P 4-4-0s, and the 4F 0-6-0; and after he left, there were the 0F 0-4-0T and 1P 0-4-4T, all small engines. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Small engine policy
Talk:Jack Bannister

message: How big was it? A scrap hardly deserves a mention but an A4 piece would be a notable achievement. Did he attempt to cook it in any way? I'd have thought boiled cardboard was more digestable. Hope it wasn't corrugated?! --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 18:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This piece of cardboard 

message: This article has been reclassified as a start due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 04:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: +Reclassified as a start=
Talk:Jack Burditt

message: I wonder if anybody knows if Jack Burditt is any relation to George Burditt who worked on Three's Company.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.206.72.117 (talk) 05:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Any relation: George Burditt
Talk:Jack Burkett

message: I decided to remove the section about the IRA due to it being more of a conspiracy of some sort, which is very much untrue. I would know this as a relative of Jack Burkett as to which I asked him a couple of times about this addition to his page which he has denied. There is no need to add anything about the IRA if it's just a way to say 'all Irish people were in the IRA'. It's rude and blatantly untrue. Especially since Burkett isn't even Irish. Scvdd (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the section about the IRA
Talk:Jack Cashill

message: I posit that Cashill should be regarded as notable at least among contemporary American writers.  Furthermore, his works as a writer have been the subject of critical review by esteemed publications: The Los Angeles Daily News, San Francisco Chronicle, and National Review.
(sources: http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-California-Cultural-Rumbles/dp/1416531033/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1234034404&sr=8-1, http://www.cashill.com/hoodwinked.htm  and  http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Forceful+frauds.-a0136648557, http://www.cashill.com/hoodwinked.htm)
If we are to take Wikipedia's dedication to unbiased objectivity seriously there should be no question as to Jack Cashill's "general notability" as an American writer.
Smblackwell82 (talk) 19:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Notability of Jack Cashill 

message: Without something like evidence that accused murderer Scott Roeder was influenced by Cashill's article on Tiller's trial, the sentence I just deleted is pure innuendo and a violation of WP policy on biographies of living persons, as well as violating  the WP ban on original research in any case. You would need to find a reliable source that specifically connects Cashill's statements to the murder of Dr. Tiller. 
Incidentally, I support the legitimacy of late term abortions given compelling justifications.—Blanchette (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connecting Cashill with the murder of Dr. George Tiller? 

message: The book chapter just lists the books back to back the bilography lists the book with isbn number and publication year this looks must nicer. I would like to remove the book chapter as well as its context. but do i need permission from moderator to delete anothers work
Nerdypunkkid (talk) 21:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is a book chapter and a biblography chapter both necessary
Talk:England national netball team

message: i think england are the worsed country in the world Wales, Scotland and Ireland are much better
i think that people who say that they hate england need to get a life. yes england are up them selves most of the time but we do not say that we hate scotland, wales, and ireland constantly.
: Um, thanks...Qst (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jack Douglas (actor)

message: Mention is needed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alf Ippititimus

message: Claims that his cameo appearances in Carry On Matron and Carry On Abroad were "inconspicuous", are ridiculous. In Matron he jerks and twitches across the screen as "Twitching Father", before eventually picking up a phone and delivering his one line (in a maternity hospital): "Could you get me the Guiness Book of Records please!" In Abroad he is likewise jerky and twitchy - this time as Harry, an annoying patron at Sid's pub who spills pints with his violent twitches. In this film he has several lines and appears both in the opening scenes and also at the end of the film. In The Carry On Campanion Robert Ross notes that Douglas' cameo in Matron was a "success", and that in the film's original publicity material he was billed as playing "Jack Douglas". (So, he was specifically mentioned in the publicty.) By the way, the entire point of a cameo appearance is that it is "conspicuous", they are designed to be noticed. It is not a bit part. Format (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jack Doulgas' Carry On cameos