lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:MTV Video Music Awards

message: The "most wins" source shows that MTV never counted featured artists... until 2014 when they reported I Azalea as the artist with the second most nominations, most of them coming from "Problem" (Ariana G feat I Azalea). Then, in 2015 they didn't count featured artists, as they announced Taylor Swift as the artist with the most nominations, when Kendrick Lamar–thanks to "Bad Blood" and his own videos–was the most mentioned in the list. 2016 and 2017 is not clear. This year, they counted featured artists. CC: . Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Then Rihanna should only be listed as a 5-time winner, no?  "Live Your Life" won in 2009, and "This Is What You Came For" won in 2016.  She was listed as a 6-time winner before I edited, hence my question. Andresg770 (talk) 07:01, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: In 2009 MTV didn't count featured acts, in 2016 Billboard counted them as nominees. It should be explained with a note, because a normal reader (or fan) will be asking by this one yes and that one not. It's lowkey messy. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 07:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh, this would all be fixed easily if MTV brought back that "Biggest Winners" webpage they used to have.  But considering that they still haven't even re-added all the nominations to the individual VMA pages in the archive, I'm not hopeful that's happening anytime soon... Andresg770 (talk) 07:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured artists counted / not counted 

message: There are discussion currently underway at Files for Discussion to purge notable award ceremony images from the project.  Specifically:
* Will Smith slaps Chris Rock
*Janet Jackson and Justing Timberlake's wardrobe malfunction
* Kanye West grabs the mic at VMA 2009.    
Comments encouraged.   Feoffer (talk) 21:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Image deletion proposals

message: Never end  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.78.193.172 (talk) 18:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wap trick 

message: Mention the time parameters that allow a video be nominated for a particular year. 70.125.89.239 (talk) 04:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eligibility question… 

message: This Article is clearly WP:TOOBIG and should be WP:SPINOUT into separate articles. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should be split into separate articles.
Template talk:Sfd-t

message: I have removed the anchored link added by User:CyberSkull because it attempts to link to an anchor named after the article name from an article page with an afd-nominated template.
I believe the intention may have been to create an anchor based on the template name rather than the article name. Theoretically this approach would be sound, but the headings of most sfd nomination don't match up with the template name, so in practise this approach is unfortunately also flawed. --TheParanoidOne 05:04, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of anchored link

message: I just changed the template to be more like the TFD template - that is, we find a consensus, not vote. Remember, WP:NOT a democracy. Wcquidditch | Talk 19:11, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewording 

message: This template "is part of Wikipedia's administration and not part of the encyclopedia". There are other ways of notifying those with an interest in this. cygnis insignis 08:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  clutter 

message: Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Deletion discussions#Have all XfD be substituted and link to the actual page of discussion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether or not that was done, it's not working now. I have raised a request at Wikipedia:Requested_templates#Substitute_page_name_in_Template:Sfd-t. – Fayenatic London 12:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have all XfD be substituted and link to the actual page of discussion
Template talk:User blank

message: Is there a way to code the template to shrink the lefthand font appropriately to maintain the 45px box sizing?  Otherwise, the fonts remain the same size, expanding the box out of alignment with the rest of the  templates.  I know some of the Babel templates themselves are sized differently, like  and  so as to maintain conformity with the rest of the  templates.  —  THOR 17:40, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  sizing? 

message: What's the difference between this and ? --Rory096 01:49, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Having been created in late August 2005, this template was created as part of the babelbox system, and therefore pre-dates  and the more recent use of userboxes in general.  Specifically, it looks like this template is used to standardize the size and green colors for the native-level babelboxes, such as .  Similarly, there's , , , etc. to standardize the colors for the other user language levels in babelboxes (as in , , , etc., respectively).  I suppose these could probably be re-implemented using the standard Userbox template, but I don't think there's good reason to since the current system is more babelbox-specific and seems to be working fine. — Jeff | (talk) | 10:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I created these based on the  series.  offers more flexibility but substitutes poorly (it leaves in all sorts of unnecessary logic). Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 04:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant?

message: Da LunGstar M3dness (talk) 19:20, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2019 

message: I need to edit a blank page for a school project so yeah DieMyFriend (talk) 14:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Your issue has nothing to do with this template. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2020
Talk:Biogeographic Regions

message: I'm suggesting this be merged into ecozone. They seem to be extremely similar articles. Or, perhaps the two should be transferred to an even broader umbrella article. At this point, however, it is extremely confusing just exactly what the difference is between the various terminology here, and so I would appreciate if someone more knowledgeable could settle this issue. 207.233.110.65 22:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Cydrome

message: The paragraph about backward compatibility only being solved by JIT isn't true. Backward compatibility was solved by having dependency information placed into the instruction stream (by the compiler). In that way, wider machines that issue multiple
long instruction words in parallel can be built with full backward compatibility. That's how Itanium and the TI DSP solutions do it.  Dyl 05:35, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
:The comment may not be true "NOW" but was true then - I worked there, and that was our belief at the time.  Note that some of the folks that worked at Cydrome went on to work on the Itanium. So they DID solve the problem eventually.  Further, I would argue that JIT is ALSO a solution.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.240.50 (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Backward compatibility
Talk:Republican China

message: thers was not or is not such a country called “Republican China”.Ksyrie 04:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: suggest deleting the Republican China

message: I've requested this be deleted as there's another, more populated, disambiguation page on the subject LampGenie01 (talk) 01:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This should not redirect to the disambiguation page because "Republican China" refers exclusively to the period 1912-1949. The current redirect is accurate. It is never used to refer to modern day Taiwan. --Jiang (talk) 19:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy delete 
Talk:City of Liverpool (New South Wales)

message: The photo on the main page needs resizing, and moved to the right. Vk2tds (talk) 03:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo needs resizing 

message: As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the City of Liverpool, New South Wales, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 10:35, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Local Government Area
Talk:Aelbert Cuyp

message: I've recently uploaded 19 new high-resolution images of artwork by this artist from Google Art Project at :commons:Category:Google Art Project works by Aelbert Cuyp. Please have a look and feel free to use any that are useful.. Dcoetzee 23:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: New images from Google Art Project

message: Though the source for the claim that Cuyp was a member of the High Court of Holland indeed mentions this "fact"( National gallery page about Aelbert Cuyp) this is one case where we cannot trust the National Gallery. I looked at the database about members of the Court and there is no one mentioned with his name. The closest is Petrus Josephus Cuypers. This online database is very authoritative. There is no other bibliographic source I could find for the claim on the National Gallery page (which is unsourced) so I think it is best to remove the claim (though I have left the rest of the section in place).--Ereunetes (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a member of the High Court of Holland 
Talk:Yarrawarrah

message: This page was moved from "Yarrawarrah" to "Yarrawarrah, New South Wales" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) -- Ianblair23 06:22, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 
Talk:Bigeye tuna

message: I have updated the page with information on the vertical movement behavior and diet behavior of the bigeye tuna.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junsu.shinn (talk • contribs) 02:57, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:Alpha Phi Delta

message: I know that Dr. Phil DiStefano is an alumnus, and he is the chancellor of the University of Colorado.  Do you guys know of any? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.240.92 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous APDs? 

message: I am removing the following from the notables list until proper sources can be found.
*Vincent D'Onofrio, Honorary, Actor, Law And Order: Criminal Intent, Full Metal Jacket, and Men in Black
*Henry Mancini, Honorary, Academy Award-winning musician
Rublamb (talk) 18:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notables
Talk:Wumo

message: What is the correct pronunciation of the name? 217.132.64.45 (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: vulf(flat, short u)-morgen(german sounding)-thaler(long a, again german sounding) 77.212.64.36 (talk) 13:01, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name pronunciation 

message: The comic changed its name to Wumo. Can someone help change the name of the article and add a redirection from the old name? 93.173.29.43 (talk) 15:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name changed
Talk:Harry Rosen

message: This bogus entry exists to trash Harry Rosen. VfD is too cumbersome to attempt however. --Wetman 07:28, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been fixed up. Everything in the body of the article comes from either the Harry Rosen Inc. website or the story from Business Edge. The trivia section is unsourced. If you think the trivia is an attack, please delete it. If you have any alternative sources, please provide them. MRoberts <> 04:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Validity of this article
Talk:Asrat Woldeyes

message: This article has a lot of information, but no inline citations, which means it fails to meet Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. Probably this article needs to simply be rewritten from the ground up. In the next few days, I intend to do this, but if anyone's watching this talk page who wants to start referencing what's here instead, please feel free. Khazar2 (talk) 07:07, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I haven't heard from anyone above, I've attempted a rewrite from scratch of this article based primarily on the NYT and Guardian obituaries. This is still a bit skeletal and other (sourced) additions would be welcome if anybody's watching. Khazar2 (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citations
Talk:Sigmund Rascher

message: translation in progress :)Lectonar 07:34, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have reverted deletion of the picture since it is of educational and instructive use, and relevant to the article. Peterlewis (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PICTURE USE 
Talk:Willem Jacob van Stockum

message: I created the original version of this article and had been monitoring it for bad edits, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.
Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive.  I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions, although I hope for the best.
Good luck in your search for information, regardless!---CH 20:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Students beware
Talk:Shared Source Common Language Infrastructure

message: It now says twice in the first paragraph that SSCLI is the reference implementation. It that really necessary? --tyomitch 01:39, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: "The current version of SSCLI is 2.0, which contains most of the classes and features of version 2.0 of the .NET Framework[1]. Unlike the previous version however, it is only supported on Windows XP SP2."
I would guess this statement is severely out of date (Vista, anyone?). Does anyone know? Jalwikip (talk) 09:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up-to-dateness
Template talk:Cfd main page banner

message: This should probably have a category or two, but offhand, I don't know what. Maurreen (talk) 07:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: I've given this template the same layout as other talk page templates (WP:TS). Also, it now takes a parameter to indicate which category it actually is, e.g. . Finally, I've made a shortcut, maybe  to redirect here. Feel free to change any or all of what I just said, it's just suggestions. Radiant_>|< 08:42, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
:Good changes, thanks. Maurreen (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: I added this to Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance. But it now says there, "This template is misplaced. It belongs on the talk page: Wikipedia talk:Template messages/Maintenance," and I have no idea why. Maurreen (talk) 17:00, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Template messages -- need help, please

message: After the rename, renamed this template and its category to match, as it seems to be put on Talk and other Categories more often than articles.
:--William Allen Simpson 05:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Categories for discussion 

message: It's now at Template:Cfdnotice/doc. +mwtoews 04:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved documentation

message: Is there a way that this template can be used to link properly to a mass CfD?  As it is now, if a CfD is part of a group, the "discussion" link will point to a section that probably doesn't exist.  —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Second parameter. Also, when I redesigned the template using parser functions, it most definitely was not intended to be subst'd, so I have no idea what prompted such a silly mistake.  Obviously, the documentation needs work!--William Allen Simpson (talk) 19:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link in template? 

message: Redirects to Cfdnotice
*
**at 04:58, 3 July 2006  moved page  to Template:Cfdnotice (match Tfdnotice, more intuitive name)
*
**at 08:10, 2 December 2007  moved page  to  (per talk page discussion)
* created 30 January 2020 by 
* created 30 January 2020 by 
* created 30 January 2020 by 
* created 30 January 2020 by 
* created 30 January 2020 by 
* created 30 January 2020 by 
— wbm1058 (talk) 16:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects to Cfdnotice
Talk:Khel Ratna Award

message: Current events attract vandals to this page.   Srijan Suryansh talk (ping me if you have birthday on 27/7/3.)) 14:23, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi Protect the article. 

message: As we all educated folks know , Prime minister of India Narendra Modi renamed this ' Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award' as Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna award. This article's heading title also have to be change as ' Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna Award' and give due respect to Major dhyanchand, the wizard. Newton Euro (talk) 12:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Newton Euro The articles are named according to the article titles policy. You can start a move request and discuss why the article should be moved to the new name. -- DaxServer (talk) 19:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this article as ' Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna Award'. 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Per discussion consensus. (non-admin closure)  — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 12:37, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna →  – The name of the award has been officially changed to Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna Award so using its previous title makes no sense. But according to WP:NAMECHANGES, we should give weight to reliable sources. A simple google search of Khel Ratna Award (#) and Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award (#) shows same result, which satisfy WP:COMMONNAME. In future it can be renamed to Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna Award, if it would be commonly used by reliable sources. -ink&fables «talk» 08:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 August 2021 

message: I have noticed that the phrase "Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna" has been changed to "Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna" at the articles of Khel Ratna Awardees, who were awarded the Ratna before the renaming. I suggest that it should be changed back to Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna, as they were awarded the "Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna" not the "Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna" (see inscription here).  Peter Ormond 💬 14:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , yes, if they were awarded prior to the name change, they should have the name of the prior award. However, it may be easier to just clarify, using phrasing like "the Khel Ratna, (known at the time as the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna)" — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:43, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A concern
Talk:The Lost Honour of Katharina Blum

message: I could be wrong, but I recently saw this film and glanced over the book, and if I recall correctly, Ludwig is actually not a bank robber (though he's suspected/accused of such).  He's a deserter who stole some money from the army, but he didn't rob any banks, and he isn't a terrorist.  
Also - the intro to this article says that Die Zeitung is modeled after the Bild-Zeitung in Germany.  It may be semantics... yet at the end of the film there is a disclaimer which says something along the lines of, "If the fictional Die Zeitung bears some resemblance to the methods of the Bild-Zeitung, this is neither intentional nor accidental, but rather, unavoidable."  
Ergo it's not a model, exactly.
That's fairly minor, though... mainly just wanted to raise the question about Ludwig. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.252.67.146 (talk) 04:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As for the disclaimer, I think it served 3 purposes: a.) To make clear what Böll was referring to, b.) to safeguard himself against a smear campaign from BILD ("neither intentional"), and c.) I interpret the "unavoidable" bit as that Böll was trying to make people aware of the overall structures, or structural bias, of a society that facilitates the existence of tabloids such as BILD. --79.193.41.248 (talk) 19:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Ludwig... 

message: Please split. Imho, it's no good having the same article for film and for a book. The film is notable, as also it's directors (Volker Schlöndorff is Oscar and Palme D'Or winner). And a film article does need an infobox. Alex ex 18:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About splitting into separate articles for book and film

message: As people have already noticed, the previous plot summary was not in fact a summary of the book (presumably it referred to the film, though I haven't seen that).   I've replaced it with a brief, but at least accurate, summary of the book. There are some things which could still be added, though we don't want to make it too long. HenryFlower 16:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just saw a screening of the film with several friends at Stanford an hour ago.  (Boy was that emotionally draining.)  None of us remember any mention of a bank robbery, just that he was a deserter who'd stolen some money.  Anyone have any evidence to support Wikipedia's statement about robbing a bank?  Vaughan Pratt (talk) 05:00, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot again
Talk:Esquilax

message: I found a notice that this article was on VFD, but don't see any evidence that it's ever been put there.  The whole thing sounds pretty ridiculous to me...an article about an obscure company logo supposedly based on an obscure reference in a Simpson's episode.  What does it mean, exactly, that it's a horse whose head and body (what's left???) are those of a rabbit?  WHAT PART, EXACTLY, IS THE "HORSE"????  I'd send it to BJAODN and  it, but I'll let someone else do that.  Tomer TALK 08:12, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
:That's the joke, of course.  Morwen - Talk 08:19, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy question

message: I think that the Esquilax should have its own article. I expanded it.Anonymous_anonymous          Have a Nice Day 21:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Civic Center/UN Plaza station

message: Recently, an anon ip added new content saying that the station was renamed to "Civic Center / UN Plaza Station" . But I reverted it because I have not yet seen or read any news or press release saying that the station itself has been officially named (although UN Plaza in San Francisco did in fact open up). The closest I came was an article on the Examiner's web site (http://www.sfexaminer.com/articles/2005/05/13/news/20050513_ne04_newsom.txt) that it was rejected back in May. I have not seen anything about the station's renaming from the Chronicle, BART, or any other third party source. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 08:26, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Under station layout and changes, the article currently states "A passageway to two additional entrances west of 8th Street and Hyde Street was opened later.[6]". However, the given reference doesn't support this claim, and I've been unable to find evidence elsewhere to prove that the entrances weren't original to the station design. Electromechanick (talk) 06:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: 1967 plans don't show the west-of-8th entrances: mezzanine plan, street plan. I can't find any definite proof one way or the other at the moment, but I'll keep looking. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station Layout - Entrances
Talk:Bekesbourne railway station

message: I have added what information I can to make more of this article. The information comes from my reference book, including the fact that the station serves more than just the village after which it is named - a common occurrence in rural areas. I have also destubbed the article. I cannot believe there is much more to be said about such a small station! Peter Shearan 08:28, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.kentrail.co.uk/Bekesbourne.htm offer a lot of info Pickle 16:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)