Talk:3HO

message: Dr. Trilochan Singh's creditbility:
Please check these links for references and credible evidence of Dr. Trilochan Singh's prominence as a Sikh scholar:
Dr. Trilochan Singh wrote 27 articles on Sikh history and philosophy for the respected "The Sikh Review" established in 1953. Dr. Trilochan Singh was in fact one of the founding editors of The Sikh Review. 
The Sikh Review, is published by 'The Sikh Cultural Center, Calcutta', and was founded in the summer of 1953 by a small group of dedicated scholars and devout Sikhs. Among them were: Sr. Raghbir Singh Bir, Capt. Bhag Singh, Mrs. Kuldip H. Singh (all deceased), later joined by Sr. Mohan Singh Kalra, Dr. Hari Singh Bindra, Dr. Trilochan Singh, D.Litt., Bhai Sahib Sardar Kapur Singh, ICS and Sr. Kulraj Singh, IRS (also deceased).
Please check these links for references and credible evidence of Dr. Trilochan Singh's prominence as a Sikh scholar:  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.182.82 (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The content of this page sounds like it was taken directly from a 3HO brochure - it is clearly biased, or at a minimum, one-sided.  I will mark it as such.
A simple Google search for "3HO" reveals that this group is considered by many to be a dangerous cult.  See the following links for more information about this perspective:
http://www.freedomofmind.com/resourcecenter/groups/h/3ho/
http://www.factnet.org/discus/messages/3/66.html?1101310715
http://www.rickross.com/groups/3ho.html
If the original author, or any other contributor, makes changes to fix this article, great.  Otherwise, I'll edit once I've had a chance to do some proper research.
--205.156.188.254 18:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know much about 3HO but I don't see the problem with the current article.  It's a stub (i.e. it contains very little information) but there is nothing biased about the information contained within.  It might not contain information about the controversies, but the article itself isn't biased.  I'll remove the tag for now.  Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 19:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reprinting a controversial organisations claims about itself without mentioning it's detractors *is* unbalanced and dangerous. Sukh is clearly wrong on this one - the information presented in the stub may have been factual accurate but is presented with a biassed 'spin', and besides, omission of the detracors opinions is bias through absence of dissent.
In my edit, I tried to address the difference between 3HO and Sikh Dharma as organizations, given that 3HO does present itself as not directly associated with Sikhi. I did not do as well of a job as I would have liked, but maybe someone else can expand upon that. I also added a little to the cult section so it looks less like a "jab" and more like serious criticism. Sources added as appropriate - I used the footnote style because it appeared to be in use in the Sikhism main article. Lastly I changed the description of Yogi Bhajan, since the main page is more appropriate for his names and titles, and instead described him as founder of 3HO. I hope to keep working on this article over time, but this is all I had the chance to do for now and I wanted to make sure that I was going in the right direction. Harsimrankaur 19:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I ended up deleting the controversial portion about the SSS title altogether, as it belongs on the Yogi Bhajan page, not on this one, since in every reference I could find, the title was not bestowed upon him by 3HO. Thanks for your patience. Harsimrankaur (talk) 17:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias and NPOV

message: I feel the "further reading" section might be better placed below the "detractors" section, so that Internet resources on both sides of the issue are kept together. What do you think? I'm going to wait a couple weeks for input before making any changes there. Thanks for your input! Harsimrankaur (talk) 09:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon further consideration, I believe a German-language book does not fit well in the English version of Wikipedia. I also noticed that Alma Mater Studiorum spammed other articles with the same information. If the book is later translated into English, it will likely be an excellent addition to any further reading section relating to Kundalini Yoga, Yogi Bhajan, and 3HO, but until then it would be better included on a German-language article on 3HO. 71.107.132.78 (talk) 02:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Further Reading Section

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 3HO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090610044331/http://tobias-lib.ub.uni-tuebingen.de:80/volltexte/2008/3596/ to http://tobias-lib.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/volltexte/2008/3596/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: 3HO and Sikh Dharma International are two separate nonprofit organizations started by Harbhajan Singh Khalsa, aka Yogi Bhajan. Until recently, the organizations each had separate Wikipedia entries. In May 2018, the Sikh Dharma entry content was deleted and the page turned into an automatic redirect to the main Sikhism entry. I have suggested that it would be more appropriate to redirect that page to 3HO, or to provide a disambiguation page. That discussion is ongoing at the Talk:Sikh Dharma page.
To keep the discussion all in one place, I suggest we use the existing discussion thread at the Talk:Sikh Dharma page. I will post additional content there to move the discussion forward.
- Lapith (talk) 20:02, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  3HO and Sikh Dharma International 

message: This article's 2nd paragraph, first paragraph under the heading 'Practices', and the first paragraph under 'Reception' clearly mention it is not a Sikh organization having no background of Sikhi either. 3HO is an organization spread vastly among European and Americas. However, there hasn't been any trace of 3HO practices in Sikhi. The Sikh organization (as mentioned under Reception) strongly condemned 3HO having relation to Sikhi. I don't see why someone would link it to Sikhi considering Wikipedia has neutral-content policy. Questions regarding how and why can be answered from my part.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.96.75 (talk) 01:14, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credibility of 3HO being a Sikh organization or a sect of Sikhism needs to be discussed, and possibly fixed 

message: This page seems to have been the site of an edit war. The “reception” section needs a citation, and to be reworded. The whole article needs a more neutral tone. -.+ThAYYta+.- (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias against