lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Maejo University

message: 22:16, 26 June 2008, Ahoerstemeier moved Maejo University to Maecho University: Romanization according to RTGS.
I agree with this-article renaming if this university is really spelling itself "Maecho".
--Love Krittaya (talk) 04:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It spells itself Maejo. The opening paragraph should be changed from Maecho University, also spelled Maejo University, to the reverse. When I get a round tuit, I will upload a picture of the Pistol Pete mascot showing him wearing a "Maejo" sheriff's badge; also, a photo of a print illustrating the school's motto, also labeled "Maejo," that are possessions of a graduate who lives and works nearby. Pawyilee (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: non-free image File:MaejoUniversityLogo.png represent the logo of this university. Images of the god are at 
Thai Wikipedia and Google images. The mascot is the same as that of OSU. OSU's own reference is a dead link, but I archived one from a blogspot for an OSU rival, which sports an image of Pistol Pete with an AK-47. --Pawyilee (talk) 15:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the mascot, this (in Thai) might be more relevant. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo and mascot 
Talk:Glochid

message: Section on removal is copied directly from this article:
  http://escholarship.org/uc/item/87v8v850/cholla2.html
It needs to be entirely re-worded. Preferably by someone who is familiar with the topic, which I am not. LaMona (talk) 17:14, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Quiabentia verticillata

message: The reference site  http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/search?q=Quiabentia indicates that this species name is a synonym for Quiabentia verticillata.  So, I would recommend changing the name for the article and any links to it.
Tyrerj (talk) 00:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2011
Talk:William Horace Temple

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Abebenjoe 04:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Someone added November 28,1898 as Temple's birthdate, without any kind of verification.  There are no mainstream sources that currently list his actual birthdate, though I will attempt to confirm his birthdate at a later time.--Abebenjoe (talk) 23:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:Ariocarpus fissuratus

message: It is a matter of scientific record that this cactus contains hordenine and N-methyltyramine, but neither of these substances has ever been associated with "mind altering" properties in humans in scientific studies. Writing in 1906, the French pharmacologist L. Camus mentioned, without further elaboration, the occurrence of "hallucinations" in animals given toxic doses of hordenine intravenously, but that's about it. Noone has ever reported anything comparable for N-methyltyramine. Indeed, N-methyltyramine and hordenine are currently being extensively marketed as nutritional "supplements" and there is as yet no anecdotal evidence of mind-altering effects from the public.Xprofj (talk) 00:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Psychoactivity
Talk:Disocactus phyllanthoides

message: There is a wrong photo on this page. It is a flower of some Epiphyllum hybride not Disocactus phyllanthoides. Jukkabr (talk) 01:36, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo attached 

message: I removed the "Technical" template. This is the type of description I expect in an "encyclopedic" article. I also replaced the picture. The picture did not match the description. (My guess is that it is of a misidentified specimen.) I am very familiar with this species, but no botany expert. I first identified some specimens 40 years ago. I agree that the technical terms are confusing and maybe they should be wikilinked.
:--User-duck (talk) 17:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve re-instated the technical message. The section is too technical, that’s why this message was placed there! Darorcilmir (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too technical 

message: axills seems to be a typo but it is not obvious what it should be - can anyone figure out what it should be? (from Wikipedia:Correct typos in one click)
 Peter coxhead (talk) 10:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  axills - a typo?
Talk:Disocactus anguliger

message: Didn't want to edit without asking. Ron (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay to change "E." to "D." in body? 

message: Fishbone cacti are epiphyllum 66.90.174.99 (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fishbone cacti are not in the Discocactus genus.
Talk:Selenicereus megalanthus

message: I began an effort to modify the description a little to be more encyclopaedic in tone, but quickly ran out of steam... I have no idea what most of the terms mean. Are "areoal roots" really "aerial roots", or are they roots coming out of areolae? What's a britle?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DewiMorgan (talk • contribs) 17:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Description could be more readable
Talk:Opuntia engelmannii

message: Hello.  I thought this photo may interest the maintainers of this page.  The article mentions pollination by solitary bees and the insect seen here may be such. I thought it may be in bad form to insert photos into talk pages so I left the file name unbracketed. Please have a look and use it if you like.
Image:Prickly pear bloom with small bee.jpg
--Bad carpet 00:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice photo! It would be good to have information on the image description page about the location where the photo was taken, and confirmation of the name of the species (if known). It's also best to upload the image to commons adding it to the page commons:Opuntia engelmannii if you're confident of the species identification or putting it in commons:Category:Unidentified Opuntia if you're not. Melburnian 09:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloom photo with bee
Talk:Echinocereus reichenbachii

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Echinocereus reichenbachii by RO.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 12, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-07-12. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:12, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Echinocereus reichenbachii by RO.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Selenicereus undatus

message: I removed the US price ($9/fruit).  Presumably an editor saw the fruit at this price; I'm not doubting that it's been sold this expensively.  I've purchased the fruit before, and while I don't remember the price I paid, it was definately much less than $9, probably no more than $5.  Given that UK prices cited in the article are far less (with equivalent transportation issues as the US), I think the $9 price is an outlier.  Prices here http://www.fromthefarm.com/fruit/Tropical-Fruit?gclid=COGulajHlZ4CFRPxDAodXkvkqg and here http://www.localharvest.org/dragon-fruit-C13466 range from $15-17/lb (in 3 lb quantities).  Ordering fruits online in retail quantities is typically much more expensive than purchasing them (retail) in a grocery store.192.104.39.2 (talk) 22:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the entire cost section should be removed.  73.149.43.153 (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure thing. D4iNa4 (talk) 05:42, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: US Price

message: I added the Chinese name, but was unsure how to do a standard Chinese language tag as can be seen in Changsha, with simplified and traditional. If someone else knows how this works, feel free to reformat the Chinese name. At least there is the simplified and the pinyin now. Ninjawailer (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese Name

message: this plant has non-vestigial roots and grows in soil. it is not a xerophyte.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.221.108 (talk) 02:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: not a xerophyte
Talk:Stenocactus pentacanthus

message: I wrote something on this page that is completely untrue as far as I know...  Please, I beg of you, change wikipedia's format!  Only let experts on these subjects edit pages, and make it a respectable, truthful, non-biased encyclopedia!  I want change!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.69.62.4 (talk) 06:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Silene

message: A dab page should be created instead of someone removing valid information because they think "silene"s are just plants.  70.55.84.13 (talk) 09:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dab page 

message: The article mentions there being about 300 species, but wikispecies only has 69, and the USDA plants database shows 88. What do we go with?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cynops3 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Try 700 species, read  to get an understanding of the completity of the issue. Hardyplants (talk) 07:50, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: number of species

message: genus Lychnis is currently redirecting to Silene, though there is apparently still some debate regarding it's placement. Maybe someone who knows their stuff can add something to the Taxonomy section regarding the history and consensus (if/when there is one). From wikispecies:
"Note: This genus is often found subsumed into Silene L. (1753) (Tropicos, 2017). However, Popp et al. (2008) and Greenberg & Donoghue (2011) found the above circumscription monophyletic. The relationship is ambiguous and will depend on work that needs to be undertaken on Silene and it relatives (Hernández-Ledesma et al., 2015)."
Random fixer upper (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Plants of the World Online regards Lychnis as a synonym of Silene. see  Plantsurfer 10:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: genus Lychnis
Talk:Lychnis

message: Lychnis coronaria has been reclassified as Silene coronaria, I will change the page. 24.108.58.1 (talk) 16:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lychnis coronaria 
Talk:Stellaria

message: The Stellaria chinensis link leads to an article about a seasnail, not a plant. 24.144.106.216 (talk) 00:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stellaria chinensis
Talk:Salicornia

message: I'm planning to rename this article "Salicornia," which is more in line with the Wikipedia Plants Project guidelines. In addition, the term "glasswort" is pretty ambiguous, and refers to species in Salicornia, Salsola, etc.. So I think the "glasswort" name should be reserved for a disambiguation page. Please comment here if you object.Easchiff 18:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article as "Salicornia." 

message: Is rock samphire even a sort of salicornium? The classification table in the article over there show some totally different orders. De728631 (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Rock Samphire]]

message: It seems odd that this page redirects from 'sea asparagus', but there is no mention of sea asparagus in the article aside from a reference in a footnote.  Perhaps there should be some commentary on sea asparagus in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.127.13 (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea asparagus? 

message: This plant seems similar to Mexican romeritos, any botanical relation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:106E:B:C6E9:D9ED:BF4:33B5:5A64 (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some relation with [[romeritos]]?
Talk:District of Columbia v. Heller

message: I took the liberty of archiving everything up to the most recent thread into Archive 2, since even the most recent commentary is encroaching on two years old. I can roll it back if there's any objection, but Archive two starts in 2008, sooo....it seemed time.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 05:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive 2
Talk:Cerastium

message: The picture on the right is not Cerastium Arvense  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.96.20.68 (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Judah Nagler

message: somebody put up a picture
Just did.BlauNacht (talk) 07:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Silene flos-cuculi

message: It was meant to be a joke how do I delete it Sburton86 (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It was meant to be a joke  

message: The species is on https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuckucks-Lichtnelke, but I don't know how to change stuff in wikidata. Ralf Muschall (talk) 18:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to the german page
Category talk:Buddhist writers

message: I've raised this concern with other lists.  This list is way to broad, it mixes novelists, scholars, and monastic authors, all of whom are writing for very different purposes.  A list of, say, Buddhist novelists or Academics in Buddhist Studies would be of much greater use.Lotus 05:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Too Broad?

message: I have reverted the unexplained deletion of the Dharmic writers category by . --Trphierth (talk) 04:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It was an empty intermediate category, unnecessary according to WP:CAT. I stated that on the edit summary, so it was not "unexplained" as you falsely claim. It also duplicates :Category:Indian religious writers which is a synonym according to the article Indian religion. That is, it is a POV category fork which duplicates an existing category.   Yworo (talk) 06:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  User Yworo's deletion
Talk:Stonyfield Farm

message: Hi! I think Brown Cow should be merged into this article because Brown Cow is a brand of this company. Furthermore, Brown Cow does not have very much content at this time and perhaps does not have a lot of standalone notability. Thanks, Bananasoldier (talk) 00:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge from [[Brown Cow (yogurt)]]
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illinois/Collaboration

message: Modeling this totally after Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Collaboration in some ways.--Kranar drogin 05:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also hoping we can stay away from Chicagoland with this, since they have their own collaboration and I don't want to crisscross with them. We will try and focus outside of that area.--Kranar drogin 05:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Set-up

message: What we need is an archive template, like peer review has, for our collaboration talk. That would be useful and avoid cluttering up the talk page after we leave an article. IvoShandor 05:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm done starting the page, go ahead and set that up since I have no idea how to do that.--Kranar drogin 05:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It may take me a minute or two. IvoShandor 05:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh yeah, it also adds the article's talk page to the :Category:Old WikiProject Illinois collaborations. Just for record keeeping's sake. IvoShandor 05:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

text: The cats don't seem to be working on the candidates template, could someone have a look at it, or maybe its the server. IvoShandor 13:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What we need
Talk:Stellaria media

message: The photograph seems to show at least several stamens. However Parnell and Curtins (2012) indicate "usually 3".Osborne 19:12, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Stamens

message: These alternative names seem to be dictionary-only words, not actually found in real use. Anyone know more about them? Equinox ◑ 18:25, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The names "maruns" and "craches" for this plant 

message: Books and resources state that some flowers have no petals, however all plants that we have examined have had petals. Could this be confused due to flowers that have smaller petals or flowers that have already gone to seed, or confused with var. apetala which is now considered to be a separate species itself?E Wusk (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Petal-less flowers

message: Is having a list of chemicals a useful contribution to this article? It seems to me that one could list all sorts of things (including all the other chemicals that are presumably in it), but without a purpose, maybe the article would be better without it. E Wusk (talk) 07:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: List of chemicals
Talk:Chenopodiaceae

message: There are still some problems with this article as currently worded; in particular, the APG II system is a list of names but does not circumscribe any of those names, either by genus or by subfamilies.  The APG II system synomymizes Chenopodiaceae under Amaranthaceae without comment.  To say that Chenopodiaceae is a "former family" is a POV (although perhaps a well-supported one) based on a particular set of data.  I've reworded the article slightly to reflect that this is a taxonomic opinion (as all classifications and circumscriptions are) but don't have time to look for other references right now. MrDarwin 14:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family recognition
Talk:Armeria

message: The species Armeria pusilla is quoted in 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_zones_of_the_Mediterranean_region#Corsica 
as an indicator plant for the Alpine vegetation belt.
Please can someone who knows more about Corsican botany and Armeria than me find the correct information and post it here or update the above page?! 
 see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Life_zones_of_the_Mediterranean_region
Thank you !
jw (talk) 21:52, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armeria pusilla !?
Talk:Superfluid film

message: "Much of the interest in this field is because as the number of dimensions increases, the number of exactly solvable models diminishes drastically."
Actually, this is wrong. In fact, lower dimensions are per se much more difficult to handle than higher dimensions.
" In three or more dimensions one must resort to a mean field theory approach."
This is quite wrong. In fact, In three or more dimensions many Quantum field theories can well be described by mean-field theory, while this is not possible for 
lower dimensions. This is related to the to the upper critical dimension https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_dimension.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vsilv (talk • contribs) 14:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are serious problems with this article 

message: Please add some info that describes what superfluid film IS and maybe some of its properies
--Fry-kun 05:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: has it been wikified already? i think someone forgot to remove the wikification tag. Xenocidic (talk) 18:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: unwikify?

message: The article seems to suggest that measurements involving the critical velocity need speeds around 100 times those achieved by the torsional oscillator, (or at least a significant fraction of 100). But for the same amplitude of oscillation, increasing the operating frequency from 1000 Hz to 10 kHz only multiplies the maximum speed by a factor of 10. (The same movements take place in a tenth of the time). So either:
* one of the frequencies is wrong, or
* one of the speeds is wrong, or
* the quartz crystal technique increases the amplitude, not just the frequency, and this needs mentioning.
(To me the third of those seems most likely, since capacitive coupling doesn't seem like a method designed to produce large movements unless ferocious voltages or very small gaps are involved.) Musiconeologist (talk) 02:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torsion oscillator versus quartz crystal microbalance
Talk:Claytonia virginica

message: There appears some mix-up:
Claytonia caroliniana has a more northerly distribution than Claytonia virginica,
but here is is the opposite.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.212.68.100 (talk) 19:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   Mix-up Claytonia virginica & Claytonia caroliniana
Talk:Portulaca grandiflora

message: The common name of this species in northern Brazil is "amor-crescido", and it is used as a medicinal plant. -- Bill Overal  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.9.182.143 (talk) 19:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

message: "Portulaca merge foarte bine cultivata pe substrat de nisip, unde isi etaleaza foarte bine intreaga splendoare"
I don't know what language this is - if anyone understands it, could you please provide a translation? Thank you! Jammycaketin (talk) 10:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article
Talk:Talinum

message: This is the plant that the Japanese made the American and Filipino POWs go out and gather from the various POW camps in the Philippines.  It is recorded and mentioned in the book PARADE OF THE DEAD by an American doctor, Dr. John Bumgarner, who was captured by the Japanese on Bataan in 1942.
Starhistory22 (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bears Further Article Inclusion of the EDIBILITY and Historic Use for POWs 

message: Village में इसे जंगली पालक कहते है,
ओर इस बनाकर खाया जाता है।
जैसे सब्जी पकोड़ी आदि। 2409:4063:4A35:EDCA:D896:3458:BBFA:8100 (talk) 01:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other name - talinam tree
Talk:Santalales

message: I just added a gallery of the type genera of the 7 families, with all the images taken from Commons. On my laptop at a zoom of 110% or less, this gallery displays on one line. I can crop the larger images if necessary. Johnboddie selected these images and put them in his sandbox. - Dank (push to talk) 21:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery
Talk:Rambling Rose (film)

message: Copied some text from Rambling Rose. Schmiteye 05:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: I believe the film features a Louis Armstrong recording of "Dixie" which runs as Laura Dern is walking around a busy city neighborhood. There is no mention of this one the page, wondering if someone can find a good reference to that. Thanks. Randy Kryn 02:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Louis Armstrong
Talk:Shacha sauce

message: I don't think this food name should have the second word capitalized.  Badagnani 05:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: What is the literal meaning of this and why does it have this name?  Badagnani 05:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just the Min pronounciation for Thai satay later rendered in Mandarin. Tea is te in the Min dialect while it is cha in Mandarin and Cantonese.--68.116.114.141 (talk) 09:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Literal meaning

message: Shouldn't we also put Cantonese in the box? Badagnani 03:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cantonese
Talk:Viscum

message: Should this article and Mistletoe not be merged? hgilbert (talk) 00:58, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I could go with that, but I don't really think so. There are more kinds of mistletoe than Viscum, so we really need the mistletoe article, but Viscum is a genus that justifies its own article. I reckon the best we could do would be to expand the botanical and taxonomic aspects of the Viscum article and perhaps remove some of its material that already appears in the mistletoe article, or move material from here if it belongs there. JonRichfield (talk) 19:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Mistletoe