Talk:Franklin (Peanuts)

message: Should it be included the Job's black hand-puppet Franklin, from the show Arrested Development, is more than likely an allusion to this Franklin?  D Haggerty 02:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it's more likely he's an allusion to Roosevelt Franklin --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrested Development 

message: :Image:Franklinintro.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Franklinintro.gif

message: I cover the correspondence that inspired Schulz to create Franklin in both The Peanuts Collection (pages 48-49) and in the just-coming-out-now issue of Hogan's Alley. I'm not going to add that material myself now, for WP:COI reasons, but others should consider adding the appropriate material on Harriet Glickman. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Schulz was not so much 'inspired' to create Franklin as he was 'required' to create him.  In 1968 television standards were revised so that a black character was required. Thereby Franklin was the Token Black. --66.41.154.0 (talk) 01:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That is simply false. Franklin was created for a comic strip, which not only was not under such a requirement, but a realm where Schulz took a little heat for introducing him. The character didn't appear in the TV specials until 1973. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The inspiration for Franklin 

message: I see someone has added in "Armstrong" as Franklin's last name. This was never established in the strip; it's a name taken from the TV specials, which Schulz did not view as continuity. I would suggest it be deleted. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Franklin Armstrong" 

message: As it is getting some real media coverage, today's celebration of Franklin Day may be worth adding to the article. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franklin Day 

message: http://kotaku.com/franklin-broke-peanuts-color-barrier-in-the-least-inter-1793843085  Gamaliel (talk) 14:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source 

message: The intro paragraph states Franklin was last featured in 1999, but I just saw him in 2003's I Want a Dog for Christmas, Charlie Brown and he's listed in those credits. Also, on this very page they list the voice artists who spoke for Franklin in 2015 & 2016. Clearly the statement needs removed or else clarified (such as if this means he hasn't appeared in the news paper comic strip, which I also tend to doubt to be true).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raszoo (talk • contribs) 02:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: His last original appearance in the newspaper comic strip was indeed in 1999; the strips that have run since early 2000 have all been reruns. --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last appearance 

message: The article currently uses the Hogan's Alley article "Crossing The Color Line in Black and White" as a reference. This reference should be corrected in two ways:
#Update the source location to this, the update site for the magazine
#Correct the listed author. "Tom Heintjes" was listed because that is the name that was in control of the blog software on the previous site, but he is editor of Hogan's Alley, not the author of the piece being referenced. As the first paragraph of the piece shows, the author of the actual article being cited is... me.
I will not make the change myself, as I have an obvious WP:COI.
--Nat Gertler (talk) 03:54, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source credit 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Franklin (Peanuts) →  – As the main page explains, Franklin's surname of Armstrong was never mentioned in the strip but only in one special. Since Robb Armstrong says that Schulz picked the name based on him, and since the forthcoming special uses the same surname, is this evidence enough that "Armstrong" is canonically Franklin's last name? A similar example would be the canonicity of "Tiberius" as James T. Kirk's middle name, which was only mentioned in Star Trek: The Animated Series, or "Lathrop" as Emmett L. Brown's, which is only mentioned in Back to the Future: The Animated Series. Does this apply to last names too? One example I can think of is Benson from Soap, who was only given the surname DuBois in his spin-off. How prominent does a supplementary source have to be to be canonical? Specialsam110 (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Canonical isn't important; WP:COMMONNAME is. Superman is at that address rather that Kal-El because that's what the public knows him as, even if it's not his "real" name. --  Nat Gertler (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 February 2024