Talk:Idit Harel

message: The person is likely notable, but the article sounds more like an introduction for a keynote speaker at an educational conference than a NPOV wikipedia article. Youngamerican 14:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in the process of working on this article.  youngamerican (talk)   01:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I've done most of the work on the article and I am in no way affiliated with Caperton or her company. If you think the article reads like a vanity article, feel free to edit or improve the article. Cheers.  youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 16:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. Unfortunately, as of 
September 21, 
2007, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAC. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GA/R. 
*Prose: A good copy-edit is in order. I fixed some issues, but not all. Tense is an issue in some places, for example. 
*Point of view issues: Currently the article fails WP:NPOV, in my opinion. Many parts read like a promotional website.
*Under-referenced: Currently the article is in need of additional inline citation. There are whole sections completely without reference which constitutes original research.
*Images: Logos are not free use and lack fair use rationales. I question the appropriateness of even having the logos in the article at all.
Regards, LaraLove 03:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted [[WP:GA|GA]]

message: Did a major overhaul of this article, streamlined out unnecessary/unimportant details, uncited details, updated sources, removed self-promotional prose and neutralized POV where noted. Review and feedback welcome. Also, more current web sources show subject goes by "Idit Harel," not "Harel Caperton," following a divorce. Should the article title be changed? Oleander2323 (talk) 18:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul/title change? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Idit Harel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160811164042/http://www.tribecadisruptiveinnovationawards.com/idit-harel/ to http://www.tribecadisruptiveinnovationawards.com/idit-harel
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000229214236/http://mamamedia.com/activities/magonline/home.html to http://www.mamamedia.com/activities/magonline/home.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131101064608/http://www.tribecadisruptiveinnovationawards.com/the-disruptor-foundation-fellows/ to http://www.tribecadisruptiveinnovationawards.com/the-disruptor-foundation-fellows
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified