lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inca Bridge

message: When I was there in December of 1996, I remember being told by my guide that a tourist had once tried to cross the bridge, only to fall to his death. Anybody know anything about this? --Commking (talk) 06:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tourist Deaths?

message: Puente del Inca which means Inca's Bridge in English, should be mentioned somewhere in the article, probably in See Also section. --GDibyendu (talk) 18:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Puente del Inca]] 

message: Anyone heard of whether the first of these two - the cliff-face bridge - may have inspired the secret passage through the waterfall in the Tintin adventure Prisoners of the Sun? In the adventure, Tintin and his companions accidentally penetrate into a cave behind the waterfall, a cave tunnel that takes them to the Inca remnant. The Inca hideout looks very much like it could have been inspired by Machu Picchu, and leaving a "blank" in the passage along (or into) a gorge is a solution that reappears in Hergé's waterfall passage.83.254.151.33 (talk) 22:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration of Hergé's secret passage?
Talk:Jean-Baptiste Bénard de la Harpe

message: I've seen on many other websites his name spelled thus:
Jean Baptiste Bénard de La Harpe (Jean Baptiste being is first name and Bénard de La Harpe his last).
I'm afraid that there's a confusion here. Bénard is really close to the french first name Bernard, and I think that people hearing about him as "Bénard de La Harpe" might have thought that Bénard was his misspelled first name.
http://www.enchantedlearning.com/explorers/page/l/laharpe.shtml
It's the first time that I write such a comment and I hope that I did it correctly and that it will be useful.
Thomas
astoria1854-1@yahoo.fr —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 146.95.132.143 (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bénard or Bernard? 
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-01-02/Technology report

message: Dear sir,
:First of all, thank you for all the work that you do for the community.
:I am not sure if I am posting this question on the right place, but since you are the creator of this extraeditbuttons.js and I am unable to find the answer to my question elsewhere, please accept my appology for intruding into your page.
;I would love to have these extra buttons on my MediaWiki edit box, but I am such a novice that I don't know how to.
:I pasted the "simple code" on Special:Mypage/mystyle.js but nothing favorable happened.
:Then after a while of searching, I finally ended up on the actual code that starts with  and ends with , which was provided by you.
:I assume I need to copy the large code into a file named extraeditbuttons.js and place it somewhere, then enter the "simple code" into Special:Mypage/mystyle.js.
:Am I totally off?
;Would you please be so kind to tell me
:if I can actually use this code within my MediaWiki
:and if so, where should I place the file?
: Your kind help will be received with much appreciation.
:Sincerely,
--Kohyin 00:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, is this meant for me?  I didn't write extraeditbuttons.js, in fact I'm not sure I've even heard of it. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 19:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm sorry, I guess I got lost... I followed the links in search of a help, link after link and I got here...I am sorry for unnecessary intrusion.--Kohyin 21:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ignacio Martín-Baró

message: Heavily edited for English, grammar and readability only. I personally feel the list of publications is too long. Sorry - couldn't add any citations / references. Original hidden copied to bottom. --Haruth (talk) 04:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Come on guys, it's hugely inflated.  I don't know spanish and can't really edit it at all, and I don't really know anything about this guy other than that he's one of the Jesuit martyrs at the UCA.  Does someone know better who can clean this up?Stever Augustus (talk) 02:56, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography is more than twice as long as the rest of the article 

message: I suggest that we create a new article for Baró's bibliography, not that different than Assimov's, for example. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 14:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: New article for bibliography
Talk:Abule Egba

message: An answer to this makes the article better
Danidamiobi (talk) 01:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does Abule Egba mean?
Talk:Ildikó Rejtő

message: It seems that there has to be a better way to mention Uslaky-Rejtoe's ethnicity than just inserting that fact without any other background information about this person. Thoughts? Thanks --Tom 00:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Epee, Are any non Jewish folks inducted into the Jewish Hall of fame? That would probably make their ethnicity notable :). Anyways, the way the article reads now is not improved vs my version, imho. My preffered way of presenting ethnicity is under early life, or family background, ect, not just "shoved" into the article as it is now. Anyways, I am moving on, hopefully :) Cheers! --Tom 18:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnicity in article

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.workersforjesus.com/dfi/983.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 23:28, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Fantome Island

message: Should the 1932 quotation regarding his vision of processing the local population be removed? It doesn't seem to fit in when the history section covers it operations in more detail. - Shiftchange (talk) 15:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr Raphael Cilento quote 
Talk:Agostinho-Neto International Airport

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pointe Noire Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140904125954/http://canaircongo.com/index.php/programme-des-vols to http://canaircongo.com/index.php/programme-des-vols
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
 Okay Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 23:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Lilly Daché

message: This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems.  An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements.  Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page.  MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. SandyGeorgia (Talk)  21:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Paul Poiret

message: Some sources pointed the year when Poiret started working with Doucet in 1896, meanwhile, other ones say that was in 1898. Printed books, older references, and Museum's pages use 1898, so I think that's the correct one.Editive (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doucet's years
Talk:Catherine Malandrino

message: That first sentence seems really promotional. Should it be there? 
Ndkchk 23:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regularly attracts bloated fawning descriptions of mundane things and quotes opinions in Wikipedia's voice. JesseRafe (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (October 2022)
Talk:Lapis armenus

message: There apper to be several name issues with this article.  First, the article is misspelled, the title should be Lapis armenius and not Lapis armenus, though the correct spelling already exists as a redirect to Azurite.  This redirect is supported by the listing of "lapis armenius" as a synonym of azurite on mindat.org.  The second and more noticable problem is that "Armenian stone" appers to be a term used for several different substances over the years that were not the same, and it is only current useage that treats it as a synonym of Lapis lazuli.  Either way this should be merged with either Azurite as this is what the article seems to talk about, or with lapis lazuli as a synonym. --Kevmin (talk) 22:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it also occurred to me that this should be redirected to Lapis lazuli since every source I have been able to find from 1600 on, treats Armenian stone as a synonym for Lazuli - see the sources I added like the 1998 Websters dictionary which defines "Armenian stone" as "a commercial name for Lapis Lazuli"...  All you would need to do at Lapis lazuli is mention that "Armenian stone" is an alternate name, since similar substances were known throughout the Caucasus in antiquity. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 22:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Names
Talk:Izalco

message: Please, pay attention to the information in this article! Some of it may be false! --André Oliva (talk) 01:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Information

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Izalio. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 28#Izalio until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Izalio" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Jean-Charles de Castelbajac

message: I looked up de Castelbajac and noted that the entry was said to be written in a form not unlike an advertisement. I am not in anyway connected with the person in question but, through my knowledge of the fashion industry, can confirm that he is a designer of some note and merits inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have therefore edited the entry, retaining only factual information, scant is it may be. Hopefully someone with further information can add more. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Timesnap (talk • contribs) 23:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former concerns 
Talk:Jacques Doucet (fashion designer)

message: Removed section:
::The Louvre will be hosting an exhibit in spring 2011 displaying some Doucet furniture, fashion and art collection. Some family members, Clemence from his sister's side and Eugene from his brother's side, will be involved. Terence Doucet, a graphic designer and descendant of the designer's uncle Eugene, mounted a plaque he designed on the Librairie Literaire Jacque Doucet on 24 September 2009. Terence Doucet will also be involved in the Louvres exhibit on his ancestor.
Did this show ever happen? There seems to be nothing on Louvre website. Mabalu (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section: 
Talk:Missionaries to the Preborn

message: This article seems notable, have you googled the organization? They bring up quite a few results.--E tac 00:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No sourcing or proof of notability listed on the page... Philippe Beaudette 01:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I withdraw my objection, notability is not now included.  Philippe Beaudette 01:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Proposed Deletion

message: I know Rev. Matt Trewhella. He doesn't seem like an extremist to me. I am not and have never been a member of their organization, but they have always seemed peaceful to me. The fliers they distributed about the abortion doctor at the now-closed place that used to be above the Liquid Bar didn't advocate his death or harm. They simply informed women of his legal past that involved his abuse of cocaine and wife-beating. The #4 "citation" fails to demonstrate any of the claims of the proceeding paragraph, so I am removing them as unsubstantiated.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 20:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Template talk:Nohumor

message: I had to remove this code: {{subst:#ifeq:|n| |-- ~~~~}} because the template always displayed with an added . — Sebastian 00:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be because you didn't subst: the template, you transcluded it instead.  As written before your change, it worked when subst'd.  Now it won't -- and any change to it will affect every page where it's transcluded, making them vulnerable to template vandalism. I wish you had copied the template over to a new one for the purpose of non-subst use, and left this one as is. Ben 06:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry about that - I just reverted the coda to your version, so it should work again.  But is there really no way to make it work in both modes? It doesn't make sense to create a template for non-subst, because you never know when it gets subst'd by a bot, or even by a user when they archives it. — Sebastian 09:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template always displayed sig code
Talk:Charles Jourdan

message: Contributed some information on the Charles Jordan cocktail. It took a lot of effort and digging to find, but I'm glad that I put the work in. That said, I'm having trouble with the wikiscript, and the list didn't come out correctly. Can someone lend a hand? Absterben (talk) 03:11, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed by the generous contribution of another user. Absterben (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Roger Vivier

message: On the Roger Vivier wiki page, it says "The brand has been owned by Diego Della Valle's company, Tod's, from 2006."
Meanwhile on the Tod's wiki page, it says "Roger Vivier, maker of high luxury shoes, was acquired in the mid-1990s and developed starting in 2000."
There seems to be a mismatch between these two. When was the 1st acquisition happened? 桃花影落飞神剑 (talk) 06:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation between Roger Vivier and Tod's (late 1990' to early 2000')
Talk:José Napoleón Duarte

message: Editing Policy.
I note with interest that my last editing change was removed. Marxist propaganda tends to dominate the view of Latin American taught in schools and universities in the United States (and other Western countries) and is pushed by the media (Hollywood and so on) also. Wikipedia is supposed to be open to "anyone" - if by "anyone" you mean "leftists only" then an article should be clearly marked "for editing by leftists only" - so that non leftists (such as myself) do not waste our time. You really can not have it both ways - you can not claim to be open to "anyone" and then remove all non leftist opinions.2A02:C7D:B5B8:DA00:8120:92A:62EE:D7A8 (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

message: Responding to the label on the article, I added material referenced to Grandin & Joseph, as well as to Chomsky. The references are to numerical/factual information, not to any suppositions about intent, so please double check before modifying it on political grounds. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Armand Mouyal

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 20:37, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Jean Stern (fencer)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.jewsinsports.org/olympics.asp?ID=190. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Claude Netter

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 00:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:FreeMediaOnline.org

message: Regardless of whether the organization is factual or not, almost 30% of it is nearly word for word repeats of the about us section of freemediaonline.org. It reads like a press piece, and contains many unsourced statements. It needs to be fixed, or cut down to a sourced stub. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 09:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup , badly needed
Talk:Hamburg America Line

message: The merger discussion, such as it is, is on the Hapag-Lloyd talk page. 194.176.105.39 12:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the merge notice per the conclusion of the discussion. Brholden 23:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William Jones (mathematician)

message: This article asserts that Jones introduced the dot notation for the derivative.  However, the article on the derivative credits Isaac Newton.  I was taught that Newton did so.
Maurice Fox (talk) 17:42, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I also wonder why the article says that Jones introduced the dot notation for differentiation in 1711, when Newton had used dots for fluxions in 1665 (before Jones was born). The article currently says "His 1711 work Analysis per quantitatum series, fluxiones ac differentias introduced the dot notation for differentiation in calculus." But "A History of Mathematical Notations" by Florian Cajori (Dover, 1993) says "Newton's earliest use of dots, pricked letters, to indicate velocities or fluxions is found on a leaf dated May 20, 1665." The statement in the article should be removed or clarified. What was the significance of Jones's use of dot notation in 1711? Did Jones's 1711 work merely introduce Newton's dot notation to a wider audience? Did Jones use the dot notation in a different way than Newton had? K.enevoldsen (talk) 21:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Walls of Lima

message: I thought the ones located in the "Parke dla muralla" werent the true city walls, maybe someone could confirm wether or not this is true plz. --Andersmusician VOTE 21:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remember correctly the walls in the park were part of the city's defenses against the river, so not really part of the city walls. Even so, the park is named "Parque de la Muralla" in remembrance of the walls. Do you think we should remove the pic or just make a clarification? --Victor12 (talk) 21:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parque de la muralla 
Talk:Benjamin Ward

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 01:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment