lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cubix

message: This article is a total mess. Its god run on sentences, improper grammer, spelling errors, and improper use of tenses. It needs to read more like an article on a show in the past.--Mullon 21:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: History page for the company: http://web.archive.org/web/20030423175148/www.cubixkorea.com/company/history/history.htm WhisperToMe (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History

message: I move the 'miscellaneous' list to the talk page as trivia RJFJR (talk) 19:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Robix Corp's other miscellaneous robots
Talk:Kresta II-class cruiser

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: This article needs some serious fleshing out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.35.135.136 (talk) 12:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Kamov Ka-25

message: Why are the photos being removed from the article? They are of Ka-25s, are they not? - BilCat (talk) 19:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question I have added them back pending an explanation. MilborneOne (talk) 20:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo removal
Talk:Soviet aircraft carrier Kiev

message: He not a She.
He's a russian ship, so would be a he not a she. Russian thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.243.189.133 (talk) 09:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't a Russian-language site. The English-language convention used for ships is "she", regardless of country or origin. I actually prefer the grammatically correct it, as it would avoid national preference arguments, but I'm not going to get my way on that either. - BillCJ (talk) 09:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronouns

message: It says that it is called such by the Russians and on top of that the footnote says that it is a correct discription. Why insist on calling it a carrier?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.214.57.217 (talk) 14:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cuz we smartass Russians only ever called it an aircraft-carrying cruiser to save face, due to an earlier propaganda campaign about carriers being the ultimate imperialist weapon for neo-colonial oppression. That made us feel WAY more righteous and all-around better about our decidedly innocent and ideologically true selves. Aadieu (talk) 02:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

text: There is also the reason of wanting to work around the limitations of the Montreux Convention on aircraft carriers (see ). — Saxifrage ✎ 18:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this be aircraft carrying cruiser instad of Aircraft carrier? 

message: Sad how no one is even able to go to the Chinese web to find the (now) corporate web page of the ship. The article is dated from 2011; Shame on the editors who participated. No blame on the Russians since this is an English-language portal, please. Dark Liberty (talk) 06:30, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was not written all at once in 2011. Feel free to add missing information with sources. — Saxifrage ✎ 18:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity 
Talk:Bridgend Designer Outlet

message: The person who created this entry crossed the line when they detailed gift vouchers "that make great gifts."  There were other inappropriately biased adjectives sprinkled throughout.  Accordingly, the text has been revised so that its an advertisement that at least resembles a legitimate entry rather than what it was when I discovered it: a blatant advertisement with copy that would not have sounded out of place on a television commercial.  I was tempted to delete this entry entirely as it has no academy, social, cultural or other importance and really doesn't belong on Wikipedia at all.
 HouseOfScandal 11:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved this page to Bridgend Designer Outlet, in line with the other McArthurGlen outlet pages (such as Ashford Designer Outlet).
HillValleyTelegraph 20:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Lawmaking procedure in India

message: The section "Bill in the other house" had shocking grammar (First letters of sentences not capitalised) and  rather vague and informal a tone. While I corrected these errors to the best of my ability, my not being an expert on the subject in question meant that I was, unfortunately, unable to correct the following sentence: "If the originating house does not agree with the amendments, it shall be that the two houses have disagreed." Read in the context of the section, the statement appears totally redundant; the preceding sentence gives a time limit within which the House (to which the bill is sent) must either return a bill to the first House for approval of any amendments or pass it. From what I can understand of the article, the sentence should surely reference a Joint Session (but I may have misunderstood). I also hesitate to remove the sentence as I am a new Wikipedia user, and unaware of the policy regarding whether I should remove it without asking others first. Could someone inform me as to the correct course of action?
SpiritofEnquiry (talk) 06:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Discuss the step involved in passing of a low in the state? 117.237.215.214 (talk) 06:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill in the other house 

message: law making proceduce in parliment 47.29.165.69 (talk) 14:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political  science
Talk:Powerplant

message: An electric utility generating station is a "power plant" (Meriam-Webster). A "powerplant" is "an engine and related parts supplying the motive power of a self-propelled object (as a[n airplane,] rocket or automobile)", so the redirect was incorrect. JustinTime55 (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate redirect
Talk:Blast radius

message: Should this be in Wiktionary instead of Wikipedia? It's pretty much just a definition at this point.
--HarryHenryGebel 06:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary

message: What peak overpressure corresponds to blast radius? Inquiring minds want to know 212.188.108.253 (talk) 19:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a little confused here. I came here from a different thermobaric weapon article, Father of all bombs. My question is: the article shows the FOAB blast radius as 300m - does that mean that if I'm standing 301m away when it goes off, everything is fine? Would I have to brush off some dust? Thanks! Franamax (talk) 06:13, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concrete numbers
Talk:John Craik-Henderson

message: Rayment lists the 194-45 MP for Leeds North East as being "John James Crail Henderson, 21 Dec 1890 - 3 Dec 1971".
However, a Google search for Craik-Henderson shows that Rayment has a typo, and the MP as actually called Craik-Henderson. Hopefully others can verify this through other sources. --BrownHairedGirl (talk)  • (contribs) 11:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  His name
Talk:Polyene

message: polyene has potential usage as electron/charge conductor. it is the main structure of the bridge between electron donor and acceptor.
Something could be added with regard to the antibiotic properties of polyene.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.204.217.146 (talk) 16:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

message: Why are they studied as a class ? From the references it seems to be because they are a basis for drug development. Perhaps in the lead we could say  what motivates them being considered an interesting class (eg distinct from the dienes with just 2 double bonds). - Rod57 (talk) 17:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are polyenes of interest
Talk:Dense inert metal explosive

message: The Hellfire missile has a 'metal augmented charge' variant. Is it the same thing as DIME? -- Htra0497 (talk) 04:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hellfire missile

message: It would be interesting to know why they use tungsten? Isn't steel cheaper?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.40.79.66 (talk) 14:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The distance that a fragment or object travels depends on its density and surface area.  The smaller the fragment, the less mass per unit surface area - r^2 for area r^3 for volume scaling laws there.  In very rough terms (ignoring a lot of detail effects), the energy loss per distance travelled is constant based on the surface or cross sectional area, so the distance travelled is proportional to the density.  Steel has density about 7.8, Tungsten is around 17.2, so the effective blast radius for a DIME with Tungsten is about 2.2 times further (and effective blast volume is 2.2 cubed, or about 10 times more volume affected).  With Tungsten DIME, the blast radius is about 40 times the explosive diameter - with steel, it would be about 18 times the explosive diameter.  Much less effective.  Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

text: The particles aren't that fine - 1-2 cubic millimeters.  Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why tungsten?  

message: The article says that "several doctrs" suggest that Israel was using DIME weapons, but when I checked the sources I found that those "several doctors" was only one heavily-polemic Norwegian doctor, Dr. Mads Gilbert. 
--200.127.56.65 (talk) 05:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israeli use 

message: These devices are often called "dime bombs" on news reports.  It took be awhile to find the article since I searched for dime.  Perhaps it needs a redirect for the term dime bomb.  172.165.79.93 (talk) 05:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created DIME bomb which redirects to this page.  Thanks for the suggestion!  Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dime bomb redirect
Talk:Diocese of Lichfield

message: coventry seems to have been transferred to Worcester in the 19th century, Lichfield becoming only Staffs/Derbyshire.  Morwen - Talk 11:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Infoglut

message: I could not find more detailed information anywhere on this term, but it's widely used. I hope that someone else will add more information about this term after reading this... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bericht (talk • contribs) 11:58, 12 October 2006  (UTC)
:Please see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary for why the page should not be here. Michael Greiner 12:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed information
Talk:Mường language

message: Does Muong have a standard written system? And if it was also heavily influenced by Chinese, do "Sino-Muong" words appear the same as "Sino-Viet." words? Le Anh-Huy 12:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Please add some external links for examples of the language. It is very, very interesting but the stub is too short. For those of us who want to learn more. - Pernambuco 19:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: First, this article doesn't have any citations to say that the Muong language is tonal, or indeed any citations at all. Second, I can't find much on "Muong language" anywhere else on the web that doesn't pull directly from this page. However, I can and do find the terms Viet-muong and Mon-Khmer languages or language groups. Problem is, the Mon-Khmer language group is atonal (in other words, it is NOT tonal). Why is this a problem? I think I heard that the Muong language, or at least that of the mountainards (which as I understand is a synonym for the Muong), is descend from this language group. Could someone please clear this up?--Light Dragon 20:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has two references, which both describe the tones of Mường. Proto-Mon–Khmer may have been atonal, but the Vietic subgroup is tonal. MuDavid (talk) 07:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source citation and some confusion.
Talk:Hindaun

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.196.239.182 (talk) 13:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lokesh Agarwal

message: These, in Sept 2014:
* http://hindaun-city.blogspot.in/
* http://dnasyndication.com/dna/article/DNJAI26801
* http://karauli.nic.in/home_en.htm
* http://zeenews.india.com/assembly-elections-2013/rajasthan-polls/rajasthan-goes-to-polls-tomorrow_893480.html
Now it has none and a "does not cite any references" tag. Is there a good reason for this? Samsara 18:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article used to have references 

message: Much of this article has been uncited for some years, despite tagging by other editors. I have today removed the more egregious lists of non-notable facilities, including some that could easily have been advertising. The remaining content looks rather more encyclopedic but is poorly cited, with for example the wholly uncited table of attractions containing many entries that are not even bluelinked to other articles: probably all of these are due for removal if nobody wishes to cite them. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited materials
Template talk:Football in Scotland

message: * A propos Edit of 11:32, 12 October 2006 to the  appends the  template as with other "Football in..." templates (see , , and even Northern Ireland national football team).  --MLD 11:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit of 11:32, 12 October 2006

message: I believe the term 'The SFA' should stay. 'National Association' is hardly any cleary, especially to a non-football audience and the English and French equivalents of this template (to give some examples) use their abbreviation, such as FFF, so there is no reason why the Scottish equivalent cannot do the same. On the same point, 'B national team' is too clunky a term - we do not refer, on the same template, to the 'Under 19 Team' and the 'Under 19 national team' and nor should we, 'B team' suffices without crowding the text box. 88.111.135.160 18:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm finding it hard to buy that 'The SFA' is clearer than 'National association'. On other templates, 'National association', 'Football association' or some variation seems to be preferred to an acronym. In any case please do not change the title again without consensus. Kanaye 15:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the records, you are the one who changed it in the first place. Please do not revert until some discussion has been had. 88.109.192.38 10:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite, you should take a glance at the first version. Kanaye 11:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the 10:55 12th June comment, The SFA is more appropriate. 88.111.194.53 16:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You were fun for a while but now it's becoming tiresome. Any reason I shouldn't just take this to WP:ANI? Kanaye 23:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology

message: Should the template mention this? I made one specifically for Women's Football in Scotland, but I wondered whether that should be included in this template. 2o-DeMoN-o8 (talk) 07:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If there was an article specifically about Women's Football in Scotland then a link to that could be squeezed in but I think otherwise the two templates operate well separately. Darryl.matheson (talk) 19:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For the Women's Football in Scotland link I just used Scottish Women's Football Association. Once I create a more detailed picture I will try and add one, but not onto this template. 2o-DeMoN-o8 (talk) 20:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Women's Football
Talk:William Perehudoff

message: I intend to enlarge this page. Perehudoff is an internationally known artist of extreme inportance in colour field painting. Gareth E Kegg 12:10, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:FISHERMAN.jpg

message: Wow of course Japanese fishermen would be active around Dokdo. 1935 is a time when Korea was annexed by Japan!! Its pretty obvious that Japanese fishermen would have access to the islets. If this is supposed to be supporting information that Dokdo belongs to Japan and that this article should be moved, then your on the wrong track. Good friend100 12:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Eaton Bray

message: Removed reference to Eaton Bray in Leicestershire, since such a place doesn't seem to exist!  (multimap and streetmap both result in the Beds version; BT seems to have no dialling code for Eaton Bray, Leics; No roads seem to lead there (not in road atlas of GB))
Also, changed the previous disambiguation page to a redirect, for the same reason.
Also, removed Eaton Bray from the list of multiple place names, for the same reason.
Carre 12:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there was probably some confusion with Eaton, Leicestershire.  Since there doesn't seem to be any need to disambiguate the name, I suggest the page is moved back to Eaton Bray.  Because the Eaton Bray page has been used as a dab page, I believe we have to wait for an admin to perform the move.  I have added the move template here. JonH (talk) 13:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seems uncontroversial. Moved.--Aervanath (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2002 Indy Racing League

message: As this was an exculsively American series at the time, and as speeds and distances would have been (and still are) quoted in miles per hour and miles, respectively, it seems a bit odd that this page uses kilometers. Can anyone with far more time on their hands then me change it? 76.14.26.131 (talk) 00:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why kilometers?
Talk:River Dart

message: From the point of view of their journeys across Dartmoor I am inclined to create pages for both East & West Dart.  They are certainly bigger rivers than some of the others mentioned there and their passage across the moors is not really dealt with.  Any other views?  Cheers --Herby talk to me 12:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: East & West Darts

message: I think it's time there was a Wikiproject:Devon up and running. Anyone interested, come to my talkpage and we'll sort something out. I'm not much good at HTML but if we all put our heads together I'm sure we can give Devon articles the treatment they deserve. Totnesmartin 16:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject 
Talk:Homestead–Miami Indy 300

message: I added the previous Miami race results, since there is a "loose" connection between the two events via promoter Ralph Sanchez. There isn't enough information to warrant a seperate page for the Tamiami & downtown Miami street course races, so I think it's appropriate to include them here, since the continuity works. Doctorindy 22:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition

message: The official IRL site and the Homestead-Miami Speedway site are now advertising this race as the XM Satellite Radio Indy 300. The page has been moved to that location. Doctorindy 14:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: There seems to be some confusion regarding the two previous courses from the CART/Champ Car days....
According to this link
http://www.etracksonline.co.uk/NAmerica/USA/FL/tamiamipark.html
The first track at Tamiami Park was this layout, and not the same location as the IMSA course.
Then on this link, the Bicentennial Park layout is here...
http://www.etracksonline.co.uk/NAmerica/USA/FL/miami95.html
Which upon examination, is what is shown on the Google Maps link.
Doctorindy 15:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me, good work guys. -Drdisque 15:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two circuits
Talk:IndyCar Series at the Milwaukee Mile

message: I have moved the page from ABC Supply Wisconsin 250, to IndyCar Series at the Milwaukee Mile. This is in anticipation of the September 25, 2023 press conference announcing the return of the track beginning in 2024. RegalZ8790 (talk) 17:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name Change
Talk:IndyCar Series at Texas Motor Speedway

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to IndyCar Series at Texas Motor Speedway.   No such user (talk) 09:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Genesys 600 → ? – Current title is misleading, as this year's event is scheduled to consist of two separate races, named "Genesys 300" and "XPEL 375", respectively. Furthermore, common convention has been to not include sponsors in article title. However, I have no idea where this article should be moved to. I just know that the current title is inappropriate. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 20:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, "the page move tool has been used numerous times to facilitate the frequent changes" is exactly what I'm trying to avoid in the future with this move request. We should be avoiding frequent moves when possible. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 23:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 April 2021
Talk:Kentucky Indy 300

message: Can someone justify the inclusion of the truck race info on the IndyCar race page? The truck race clearly links to a page of its own, and it is not a related or affiliated series. The reason that past Indy Lights winners have their own section on the page is because aside from the Freedom 100, no Lights race has its own Wikipage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.100.49.212 (talk) 05:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truck race? 
Talk:Dead Fall (Prison Break)

message: From an NZ wikieditor, does anyone in the US know why we have to wait an extra week for this episode?  I can't wait that long for my fix!!  :-)  Ppe42 12:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The series is on hiatus until October 23, 2006. They are showing baseball instead. There may be another hiatus before season 2 is finished. Siyavash 13:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Detroit Grand Prix (IndyCar)

message: See Discussion at Talk:United States Grand Prix East about the proposed merger. 
Sawblade05 21:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger Talk 

message: Celebrity support race held in conjunction with the Detroit Grand Prix. Information for future inclusion Doctorindy↔Talk 14:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Detroit Neon celebrity Challenge
Talk:Peak Antifreeze Indy 300

message: * I think the events held at Chicago Motor Speedway should be mentioned but results and such should be contained in a seperate article since the Chicago/Target Grand Prix didn't have any relation to the races held at Chicagoland Speedway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baloras (talk • contribs) 15:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Break into 2 articles
Talk:Billy McLaughlin

message: I added a discography. It's a strange one, lots of albums with many songs repeated. Don't know all dates and labels. Help... Airproofing (talk) 02:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: AMG says Guitar Meditations (2006) New World, seems to collide with Guitar Meditations II in the list. Have no time for a real search now, though. Perhaps later. --Jo (talk) 08:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography