Talk:Hank Mobley

message: I'm going to comment out the most recent addition.  It doesn't seem to have come off the web, but it's clearly not something someone has typed into the Wikipedia editor.  Would the anonymous contributor please say where it's come from?  I could stick it into vim and/or Perl and do some formatting, but I'd like to know where it's from first.  --ajn (talk) 10:01, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: :Image:Hank Mobley Roll Call.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hank Mobley Roll Call.png

message: The chronology of the discography doesn't concur with the individual album infoboxes. Can someone please sort this out - I have no access to the original dates. Thanks.--Technopat (talk) 10:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: I have just reverted a major change -done in good faith- to the article by User 210.216.45.47. No reason was given for the change, it removes many internal links and reads like the sleevenotes or a biography rather than an encyclopedic article. It suggests that the editor is unfamiliar with Wikipedia policy, so am posting a message on the corresponding talk page. I may be wrong, in which case, please accept my apologies. --Technopat (talk) 23:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of major change 

message: I don't wish to edit this article myself, but here are some problems I found:
By what source did Leonard Feather say that Mobley is more laid back, subtle or melodic than Rollins or Coltrane?
The Feather quote is from the liner notes for Workout and can also be seen here:
http://www.jazzdiscography.com/Artists/Blakey/mobley.htm
Feather doesn't say anything there about about laid back, subtle or melodic. It is reasonable to say that Mobley is often more laid back; but without source, this is not something that we know that Feather said or even implied, and, without source, it is egregious to claim that Feather said that Mobley is more subtle or melodic than Rollins or Coltrane.
And the part about Mobley being underrated, if included at all, would be better later in the article. It's not an essential aspect of identifying Mobley. For that matter, this whole opening would be better if it gave a factual synopsis of Mobley rather than unsupported interpretations about what a certain jazz critic meant and along with a comment about what one (among other) commentators have claimed about this musician having gotten insufficient critical appreciation. 
Before playing with Roach he recorded as a member of the rhythm and blues band of Paul Gayten. I would say something like, "He started playing locally in Newark, then joined the Paul Gayten rhythm and blues band, and by 1953 he was in the Max Roach band."
 
They were ten inch records: Horace Silver Quintet, Vol. 1 and Horace Silver Quintet, Vol. 2 (some tracks were also released on 45s). Only after the release as separate 10 inchers were they put together in LP as Horace Silver and the Jazz Messengers.
http://www.jazzdisco.org/hank-mobley/discography/
After Blakey and Silver diverged, Blakey appeared on certain Mobley albums in the '50s and Mobley recorded with Blakey as a Jazz Messenger in 1959. So the article is misleading as it suggests that Mobley didn't work again with Blakey until the '60s. And this subject of Mobley later recording with Blakey is not needed anyway.
http://www.jazzdisco.org/hank-mobley/discography/
Generally considered by whom? What objective poll establishes this claim? Yes, Soul Station is a popular album and often mentioned in the literature as Mobley's best or among his best, and it is likely (but not confirmed) that it is the album most mentioned as his best, but I know of no confirmed basis for claiming that it is "generally considered" to be his best. It would be better just to say, "among his most popular and critically acclaimed albums". 
That's empty lingo in this context. The decision (whether planned or in the moment) as to how many choruses a soloist may take is made by the leader, soloist (if allowed), producer and possibly the engineer. Length of solo is not a function of the composition. In this way, just about all jazz compostions leave room for soloists to stretch out; how long the soloists take is not a function of the composition.
But also in 1980 he played on a track on a Tete Montoliu album:
http://www.jazzdisco.org/hank-mobley/discography/
The title of the album is A Blowing Session (see the note I entered for the article on that album).
This is actually a two day Hank Mobley session that was titled by the record label as if it were a Lee Morgan session.
Also, omitted in the list of records are:
Elmo Hope - Informal Jazz 
Doug Watkins - Watkins At Large
Lauricacid (talk) 21:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  problems with article 

message: Support split - Discography section takes up more than one half of the page and should be split to a new article entitled Hank Mobley discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hank Mobley discography 

message: The "1956-1970" section states:
"In 1964, Mobley was again imprisoned for possession of narcotics."
However, the article makes no previous mention of an earlier imprisonment.
The subsequent "Personal life" section states:
"Mobley became addicted to heroin in the late 1950s, and in 1958 was imprisoned."
It would be good to include the 1958 imprisonment in chronological order, before the 1964 event.
Karl gregory jones (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --Comment by  Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 15:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narcotics arrests