Talk:Christendom College

message: If there are any users of Wikipedia that are attending (or have previously attended) Christendom College, please list your user profile under the category for it.  Simply copy and paste the following line into your profile (at the end):
[[Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Christendom College]]
--TheTriumvir 17:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christendom Alumni or Current Students 

message: The article makes a great deal of emphasis on Bozell Jr. and Triumph in the "History" section.  The only justification for this mention is a obituary given by Dr. Warren Carroll for the conservative thinker.  Did Bozell really have that much influence on the founding of the college?      
Diesel Weasel 91  —Preceding undated comment added 21:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the history page at christendom.edu, most everyone involved in the founding, Carroll himself, faculty, donors, and so on, met while working under or participating in activities under the auspices of Bozell's Society of the Christian Commonwealth.  --Sephiroth9611 (talk) 01:26, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bozell's Influence?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Christendom College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070217081707/http://christendom.edu:80/news/archives/archives02/founding.shtml to http://www.christendom.edu/news/archives/archives02/founding.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130602053514/http://christendom.edu/about/quickfacts.php to http://www.christendom.edu/about/quickfacts.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Christendom College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726172655/http://www.christendom.edu/news/archives/archives02/origins.shtml to http://www.christendom.edu/news/archives/archives02/origins.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hey fellow editors,
Why does a section on sexual assault keep getting added? The issue is highly disputed and falls way under wikipedia’s Objectivity standards. Seems like an attack by a disgruntled alumnus to me. Can we come to a consensus on this to resolve the issue? FlyPeterPan87 (talk) 23:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you the person that keeps removing it using different IP accounts that have been blocked? APK whisper in my ear 23:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

text: Yes, it appears so. Just a reminder... "Wikipedians in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a blocked editor..." APK whisper in my ear 04:49, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

text: *I'm glad that you now recognize that communication on the talk page is the proper way to address article issues.  Disruptively removing content and hiding behind multiple accounts does not work.  When the block has expired, please come back and explain your concerns.  As it stands, the content looks to be properly included in the article.  There are reliable sources addressing the the issue, and the college has publicly admitted there are problems.--Mojo Hand (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

text: * Current student here (yes, this Wikipedia account was created today, although I had a now-defunct one under an alias some years ago.) I don't think there's any dispute at this point that at least the first story is real, and of course the college has indeed made an official statement followed by coverage in local news sources, so I support its inclusion here. The wording around Title IX was incorrect (none of the referenced official statements mention Title IX, only the CNA article does, so I rephrased that statement to more accurately reflect the way the source presents it. And it looks like the visual editor's "publish changes" dialog has a strange control-flow around saving, so that edit has no summary... sorry, getting back into the hang of things here.)For reference: There is a significant amount of controversy in alumni circles and on campus about the events and how the college handled them (with a significant cohort stating that the college did nothing wrong and should not change its policies), although I think it's quite clear by now that the administration has admitted changes are needed and will be made.FlyPeterPan87, if you (or anyone else) wants to talk privately about this with me, you can send email to my school email address (firstname dot lastname at collegedomain). AugustinCavalier (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your correcting the wording. APK whisper in my ear 00:08, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding of Section on Sexual Assault  

message: User:FlyPeterPan87 has just made a very large, rather dubious edit. Some of its changes look OK, but others don't. Note specifically the difference to the "Sexual violence scandal" section that they attempted to delete before: selective word choice in the description of the allegations, removal of "sexual violence" in favor of "harassment", and deletion of the call for the resignation of Dr. O'Donnell (which I note is in the subtitle of the cited article, as well as in other sources), and deletion of the final sentence of the section on protests. I'm hesitant to completely revert the edit, but I'm not sure what the best course of action about the dubious content is (seeing as I am obviously also biased on this topic.) AugustinCavalier (talk) 19:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored two referenced facts. I don't have time to look over the rest at the moment. I'd appreciate if FlyPeterPan87 would weigh in on why calls for the President to resign should be removed. APK whisper in my ear 17:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New dubious edit by FlyPeterPan87 

message: AugustinCavalier, not sure why you feel the edit is dubious. I agree the bit about the resignation should have been left in (I didn't realize it was in that article. I hadn't read that one previously, and thought it was just alumni gossip. The counterpoint of the Change.org petition showing all the alumni who feel differently should probably be included then, too), but the rest was an attempt to get the wikipedia page up to date and in line with other college wikipedia pages.  FlyPeterPan87 (talk) 18:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the part about the change.org petition. For future reference, please try to keep the conversation in one section. (aka your reply should have been above) Thanks. APK whisper in my ear 19:19, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

text: Sorry about that, AgnosticPReachersKid,  will do. FlyPeterPan87 (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  About recent edit 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:51, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: FlyPeterPan87, undoing that edit doesn't readd the deleted photo. APK whisper in my ear 19:58, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion