lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rosemary's Babies

message: I would like to contest the speedy deletion of "Rosemaries Babies"
this band:
1.  Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels 
2.  Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable : Eerie Von was part of Samhain, Danzig and the Misfits
how else can i assure the non-deletion of this article as i would like to continue to add to it
:Alright -- that makes a case for an assertion of notability: I'll WP:AFD instead. Xoloz 18:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't it also be possible for this editor to follow the guidelines for notability of musical groups, and introduce appropriate citations? -Fsotrain09 18:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I’m Big Ones. Remember me the bassist after Bob. Bob was a far superior musician. I only had the money to buy a bass. I could almost play our few songs. I just was a big skinhead. And fit the image well plus I cleared the pit slamming everything in front of me 
OH WHAT GOOD TIMES WE HAD  IN THE DAYS OF CBGBs  and Bleeker Bobs  RIP Bob  everything dies   Live strongly to the end please 
PEACE 2603:9000:CCF0:8000:5B7:F533:1FE4:AE3B (talk) 16:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted me
Talk:Charleston, Vermont

message: Over 26,000 families: this has to be incorrect for a population of about 1,000. Mariedegournay (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Families
Talk:Colchester, Vermont

message: :
A title that never existed, but who's counting? (There was a Viscount Colchester from 1621 to 1737.) —Tamfang (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  eponym
Talk:BASIC Stamp

message: Is it possible to dump the memory of a BASIC Stamp?  (as in: recover the program written to it)
No, it is not feasible to read the program written to the BASIC Stamp.  You could remove the EEPROM chip and read that, but you would only get the tokenized program.  There is no easy way to convert the tokens back into PBASIC.  See Parallax's BASIC Stamp FAQ for more information. Erpingham 13:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dump the memory of a BASIC Stamp 

message: I've just added the section on comparison of 'raw' PICs with the Stamp. My conclusion is that the Stamp is now obsoleted by the Flash-programmable PICs, providing a generally lower performance at a much higher price. New designers should completely avoid it, and learn to use perhaps a 16F84 natively instead. This conclusion is (I think) supported by the evidence, but is nevertheless very one-sided against the Stamp. Is that an NPOV issue?  RichardNeill 07:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is an NPOV issue.  It seems rather inappropriate to proselytize people about 'raw' PICs.  If you feel it's necessary to mention a 'raw' PIC as an alternative, do so.  However, there is no reason to try and convert someone to using 'raw' PICs.  This is especially true considering the purpose each serves.  BASIC stamps are meant for beginners and hobbyists:  People who aren't super fluent in machine or more powerful high level languages.  Mention the raw PIC as something that people use in more powerful or advanced applications, but don't make a table of how you think a BASIC stamp sucks.Kakomu 16:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison 

message: Perhaps we should add a section about how to program the BASIC Stamp.  Parallax provides the BASIC Stamp Windows Editor at no monetary cost.  They also provide a tokenizer library.  Several projects (Bstamp and BSide being the most notable) have been started to use this library on GNU/Linux.
Erpingham 19:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information about how to program the BASIC Stamp 

message: A citation is needed for the claim that BASIC Stamp "clones" that are pin-compatible are "not necessarily software-compatible."  Such a claim seems dubious since the manufacturers of these clones presumably intend them to be used as replacements for BASIC Stamps from Parallax.  Indeed, without a citation, this claim sounds almost like somebody (Parallax?) is simply trying to give potential users a vague fear of using clone chips.  I intend to remove the claim if no body can find a reference to support it.Superbatfish
: You're right, so I removed it. Devil Master (talk) 15:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BASIC Stamp "clone" compatibility
Talk:Maritime nation

message: Since this article was essentially a wiktionary article with some disambiguation and notes on maritime nations, I moved most of the information to the disambiguation page and moved this page to Maritime Nation -Âme Errante 06:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Would this be better as a wiktionary article?
- Ame Errante 18:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary Article?
Talk:Enlisted rank

message: Can someone offer an explanation of how this particular term ("enlisted") came to be used for this purpose? It has always seemed to me that the simple meaning of "enlisted man" is to exclude those who have been drafted into the service. --Keeves 18:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't the Sergeant Major of the Army / Marine Corps, etc. an E-10?
Thedrewid314 04:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: E-10

message: The rank chart is missing the abbreviation SEAC in the E-9 category for the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Ncohistory (talk) 20:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman (SEAC)

message: The usage of  is up for discussion, see Talk:Enlisted (TV series)  -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 06:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Enlisted}}"
Talk:Error of impunity

message: *This page is definitely important. It just needs some more work to build it a little. Malick78 18:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Karla Homolka has been added in the notable cases section - yet she was given a plea bargain. That's probably not really the 'lapse' in justice that is meant - otherwise we will have every case of a plea bargain being included. Thoughts? Malick78 (talk) 19:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Karla Homolka]]

message: I terms of making errors, type one and type two errors are just the topic and of categorizing how we can be wrong in our inferences.  In trials of people for crimes we can make either error and the language of statsitcical infeenvcne is specially apt.  02:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Statistical inference

message: I've just uploaded an image to the Wikimedia Commons that complements this article. Perhaps the author would like to include it here. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adjudication_distribution_curve.png  --Mino-wiijiindi (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Accompanying image
Talk:Dave Kilminster

message: This article is an absolute mess, and, even though the material I removed was restored because the writer claims it was not copyvio, the article is a mess and cannot be left this way, as it is terribly un-Wikipedia-ish (if that's a word...).  If I had the time, I'd fix it.  Bill (who is cool!) 15:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As you noticed, I put here the wikify and cleanup templates, eventually you rewrote the article properly, and later the original author restored previous  content; I do not mean to be offensive to anyone, but only to remark that actually it violates Wikipedia's policies (neutrality, POV, bias, paragraphs, formal/encyclopedic language vs magazines' slang, and so on). I like the way it is now, but it's too different from the standard.--Doktor Who 20:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not that I don't like the way the article is written (it would be fine for any website, blog, or other page of the sort), but it is so far out in left field as far as Wikipedia standards go, it needs to be rewritten, probably in full. Bill (who is cool!) 20:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, I confirm you're exactly right, but I do not have the time for now, sorry. --Doktor Who 23:28, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Should I have some time, I'll restore some of the content that has been deleted, but I'll do properly, merging it into the current revision. Furthermore, why a subst-afd has been put here? Why this article should be deleted? Isn't Dave Kilminster notable enough? I'm going to delete that ad, if someone doesn't agree, please post here the reason before reverting.--Doktor Who 03:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't we have to delete the "personal" section?Doktor Who (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: David is his son, right? AMCKen (talk) 01:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Ian/Lemmy
Talk:Essex, Vermont

message: The Town of Essex has three voting districts. One is incorporated as the Village of Essex Junction, while the other two are unincorporated.  The Town and Village share the same fire department, police department, high school, post office, zip code, phone numbers etc.
Because of the single post office, all address in the Town have their mail addressed to "Essex Junction" regardless of which voting district they are in.  This means that a reference to "Essex Junction" does not actually imply the Village, any more than the shorthand use of "Essex" suggests in or out of the Village.
I.E. unless made clear by its context, any reference to Essex, Vermont is ambiguous, and the two articles should make that as clear as possible in the introduction.
(For the record, I have lived in Essex for the better part of four decades) —MJBurrage(T•C) 23:40, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Essex vs. Essex Junction

message: The lede paragraph incorrectly stated the population figures for Essex Junction, and as this is extraneous information (for which the correct amount is already given in the separate article for Essex Junction), i deleted that portion of the sentence. ~Teledildonix314~Talk~411~ 22:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  lede paragraph incorrect population stats
Talk:Billerica and Bedford Railroad

message: A map showing the actual location of the line and its intended stations would be good to see. Snezzy (talk) 19:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added one. Beowulf (talk) 18:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A map? 

message: Given the fact that the narrow gauge line was in existence for less than a year, it seems to me that there is insufficient importance given to the standard gauge line which was extant for something like 77 years!
Beowulf (talk) 18:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been "put straight" on this issue.  The Billerica and Bedford R/R refers solely to the narrow gauge line.  The standard gauge line never went by that name and so my comment is inappropriate.  I will be fixing up the map references, and adding maps to the appropriate section of the Boston and Lowell Railroad. Beowulf (talk) 16:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard Gauge Line 

message: links to Google Earth maps don't work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paddling bear (talk • contribs) 04:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Earth 

message: Please double-check the 2nd line. Did he come from Hazelwood or Hazelhurst? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed this to Hazelwood, Massachusetts. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazelwood or Hazelhurst 

message: I changed the sentence "Mansfield, undeterred, went on to promote the two foot gauge in Maine, where the largest New World network of these lines was ultimately built," because I believe that the network in Mexico/Yucatan was larger. I furthermore not sure, whether this was really a network, as the lines were not connected to each other. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The largest New World network
Talk:Kilmashogue

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Kilmashogue.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement 

message: The image in this article is *not* the wedge tomb at Kilmashogue. The tomb is not at the summit but on the side of the hill near the car park. The photograph appears to be one of the rock outcrops that lies roughly South East of Fairy Castle, the summit of Two Rock Mountain. I don't believe that site is a cairn; I think it's a natural formation (tor?).
Have replaced with a number of images of my own of the site. Also slightly modded the text to remove some of the more unecyclopedic material. - Joe King (talk) 19:25, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong image
Talk:Fairlee, Vermont

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  05:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: Lake Morey claims to have the longest skating trail? Doubtful. Not the trail, but it's doubtful that the lake is making the claim.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 15:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc
Talk:Fayston, Vermont

message: Can someone who has access to the 2010 census information update the figures about the town's numbers based on that? The population has been updated in the info box and in the first paragraph of the article, but all of the information in the Demographics section is based on the 2000 census.
Bill Jefferys (talk) 02:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 Census 

message: How is "Stephen Guerrera" notable?  Refer to Wikipedia:Notability (people)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TYLER (talk • contribs) 01:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people 
Talk:Glover, Vermont

message: Need articles on the following notables, not allowed without an article:
* Emory A. Hebard, former resident, elected Treasurer of the State of Vermont for twelve years (six terms)
* Melvin Mandigo, state representative 1965-1974, state senator 1974-1980The World Student7 (talk) 16:39, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Two notables removed
Talk:Greensboro, Vermont

message: There's a statement here to the effect that the town's boundaries are in some way related to the Winooski River. This is a bit hard to believe, as the headwaters of the Winooski are in the Cabot/Walden area, roughly 20 miles southeast. Hushpuckena (talk) 15:03, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. rm it. Maybe the editor meant Lamoille River? It does not seem improbable that river power was taken into account when drawing town lines in post-colonial times. Needs citation in any case. Student7 (talk) 02:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town boundaries 
Talk:Hinesburg, Vermont

message: It would be good to have a section something like "Hinesburg in the news" that could mention the town's appearance on the Postcards from Buster TV series and subsequent controversy. Lawikitejana 13:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''[[Postcards from Buster]]''
Talk:Dundee and Newtyle Railway

message: would it be possible to use this  photo in the article. I notice that it says copyright university of dundee archive services but the date on the photo states it was taken in 1833 Ydam 18:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That depedends. Where are you and are you worried about uk (probably scotish in this case) courts?Geni 01:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The date the photo was taken is irrelevant. The information you need is 1) the date of death of the photographer; 2) the date the copyright was last renewed (in this case by the University of Dundee). I think it is still under copyright, though it is very plausable that the copyright holder may allow its use. └ VodkaJazz / talk ┐ 13:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it was published in the US before 1923, or anywhere in the world before 1909, then it is PD in the US, and copyright renewals and the death date of the author/photographer don't matter at all. DES (talk) 00:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: In any case, the archive copyright is almost surely compeletly invalid under US law. Note that if the photo was taken in 1833, it is very likely (virtually certian) that the photographer died sometime before 1913, which would also make this PD under both UK and US law. (I am assuming that the photog was at least 20 when the pictuire was taken, as iit appears to ahve been an officail corporate photo -- at least a corporate source is credited -- and thus the photog is very likely to have been a pro. I further assume that he lived to be no more than 100, again highly likely indeed. The UK now uses Life+70 copyright terms, so as long as the photographer died before 1936, this is PD there, and also in the US). DES (talk) 00:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I wish it were illegal to falsely claim copyright on PD images. DES (talk) 00:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out the template . It should be applicable as far as I can tell. Royalbroil 01:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright issues

message: Dundee and Newtyle Railway#Overview gives the gauge as . However Scotch gauge#4 ft 6½ in gauge gives the gauge as  or before that as 4ft 6½in (1385 mm). Some one please clarify. Peter Horn User talk 21:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now corrected - it was . Pyrotec (talk) 13:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepency 
Talk:Isle La Motte

message: Added photo of the Head of Isle La Motte. --Rkstafford 03:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: An editor keeps changing the info box so it appears that the US does not own Isle La Motte, which it does. Also changed is a count, which is unWP:FOOTnoted. Please supply a WP:RELY citation. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Isle La Motte is definitely inside the United States. Royalbroil 02:32, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Not in the United States
Talk:Solomon Islands campaign

message: In addition to the Guadalcanal campaign, I've been thinking of breaking the Solomon Islands campaign into further campaigns-within-the-campaign.  My thinking was to breakdown the Solomons campaign into something like this:
*Solomon Islands campaignbox:
:: 1st Tulagi - Guadalcanal - Cartwheel - Death of Yamamoto - Central Solomons - Bougainville
* Central Solomons campaignbox:
:: Blackett Strait - The various land battles that right now are all included in the New Georgia entry - Kula Gulf - Kolombangara - Vella Gulf - Horaniu - Vella Lavella - Naval Vella Lavella
*Bougainville campaignbox:
:: Treasury Islands - Choiseul - Empress Augusta Bay - Cape St. George - Green Is. - 2nd Rabaul - The various land battles that occurred on Bougainville for which there aren't, as of yet, seperate articles (Hyakutake's counteroffensive, Hellzapoppin' Ridge, etc)
My reasoning for doing so is that once we start adding seperate entries for the various land battles on New Georgia and Bougainville, the Solomon"s campaignbox will become large and unwieldy.  I welcome any thoughts or suggestions on my idea. Cla68 05:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO it would be better to have one box for the Solomons, including single entries for New Georgia and Bougainville, and to have separate boxes for for New Georgia and Bougainville that are used on the subsidiary articles when they are written. Grant65 | Talk 07:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts on breakdown of campaign box
Talk:Johnson, Vermont

message: Just viewing this article for the first time, I noticed two things, neither of which I have time to fix right at this moment, but thought I would flag them for anyone who does have time:
* The Demographics section is all about the 2000 census info. The 2020 census info has been included in the lead paragraph, but the demographics section is all 2000 info. It should be updated and perhaps slimmed down to have less detail.
* The references to "Northern Vermont University-Johnson" (including the external link) and the "Vermont College System" are now outdated as NVU was merged with others in the state to become "Vermont State University" (see https://www.northernvermont.edu/ )
I'll note that the Northern Vermont University article also needs some updates. - Dyork (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested updates (Dec 2023)
Talk:Men's role in childbirth

message: A nurse-midwife is a modern term and distinction.  I believe that this should be changed to simply "midwife".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.165.14.201 (talk) 09:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Expand, not rename this. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 16:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have you read the citation regarding "Men's Fear and Anxiety?" (Vernon, 2006).  If you haven't then you haven't read the evidence.  There is no shortage of citations included in Vernon's work.  Maustrauser 00:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The article presents the gradual shift from midwives to physicians in the US in a biased and accusatory light. I think it needs a total re-write.
18.238.2.191 (talk) 05:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I would like to know more about the legislative histories related to this article's topic. Who's who and all. Sweetfreek (talk) 07:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Data 

message: if the US did not exist in the mid-18th century? It only came to existence in 1781, and even long after that, doctors didn't receive any real professional training, let alone travel to a foreign country to receive training. Is it possible that this is a typo and the author meant the 19th century?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stupidinsidejoke (talk • contribs) 04:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added  for this as it is still there. Lineslarge (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How would US citizens go to Great Britain in the mid-18th century... 

message: I came here to find out if countries other than the US have fathers-to-be in their delivery rooms. This article has been here at least 14 years and only lists the US and Australia. I would fill it out myself but can find no data. Is it a US/Australia phenomenon?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mensch (talk • contribs) 20:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  US and Australia? Comment
Talk:Lincoln, Vermont

message: I'm a bit concerned that Lincoln's history is mostly about Benjamin Lincoln, who never even set foot in the town. That portion of it should be greatly reduced and replaced with an actual history of the town.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bachrach433 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: I removed some dead external links so there are some things that need citations if anyone has anything. Leefkrust22 (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 