Talk:Katamon

message: If "it is universally known as Qatamon," why is the article under Gonen? (Languagehat 12:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NOBODY calls this neighborhood Gonen. It is known as Katamon, and that should be the name of the article.--Gilabrand 19:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: title

message: I think the material on the Katamonim should be in a separate article linked to this one. Any thoughts?--Gilabrand (talk) 08:06, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there enough material to justify a separate article? It's not as if this article or the "Katamonim" section is very long. (not opposing, just commenting) Rami R 11:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  katamonim 

message: Why was Israel removed from the lead? I'm thinking of starting an ARBCOM clarification but the country is certainly within the green line and as such should not be contentious. It is Israel. Sir Joseph (talk) 03:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because the world is still waiting for Israel and Palestine to reach a peace agreement and terms related to Jerusalem before they are willing to declare ownership of any part of the city to one country or the other. As no nations technically recognize Jerusalem as being in Israel it would be quite odd (read is) for Wikipedia to take a stance different from the international community. Sepsis II (talk) 04:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  That would be about Jerusalem and the whole kerfuffle about embassies and what not, but "west" of the green line is Israel, it was never part of Jordan, or any other nation but Israel. It went from Mandatory Palestine to Israel, it is not disputed territories. It's not Palestinian territories. I could see not doing Jerusalem, Israel, but instead have Jerusalem, Israel, as two distinct entries. Sir Joseph (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  From the perspective of international law, the status of West Jerusalem is undetermined. On the other hand, practically nobody doubts that Israeli sovereignty over West Jerusalem will be accepted as part of any future "settlement". It would have been accepted already if Israel didn't demand both parts. That makes it de-facto quite different from East Jerusalem.  Personally I am not too bothered by "Israel" attached to West Jerusalem locations, while I am adamantly opposed to attaching "Israel" to East Jerusalem locations. Zerotalk 04:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

text: It's a good thing your opinions are irrelevant anyway. Now excuse me while I walk through east Jerusalem, part of the CAPITAL OF ISRAEL.137.147.16.137 (talk) 16:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  To make it easier, I posted a "RFC" on the Jerusalem page about these neighborhoods. Sir Joseph (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  User:Sir Joseph: Firstly, no IPs should  edit this article anyway, after Wikipedia:ARBPIA3. Secondly, all the IPs which were reverted were from Telstra, Australia. Now, Telstra-IPs have a history since last summer with death threats, rape threats, threats against editors family. See User:Huldra/Telstra-socks. (I got plenty of death- threats myself, because I insisted that Duma, Nablus was not in Israel...). This is why many of us have a "revert on sight" whenever a Telstra-IP turns up on ARBPIA-pages: they should be felt *very* unwelcome.   Huldra (talk) 21:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation. I'm sorry you had to go through that. Some people are just well, horrible I guess would be a decent enough word to use. Sir Joseph (talk) 22:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, the "problem user" probably needs a shrink, IMO, cheers, Huldra (talk) 23:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katamon is in Israel 

message: A map would be very helpful. I am not an experienced editor, or I would try to do it myself. Victor.Sac (talk) 17:09, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAP? 

message: Today Katamon is splitted into two sections: Old Katamon (the one that existed in 1948) and Katmonim which is a cluster of neighborhoods south of Old Katamon built between 1950s to the 1970s. They are administered as two different neighborhoods but share the same name. Should Katmonim and Katamon be splitted?--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we split Katamon and Katmonim into two articles? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Katamon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721140806/http://www.tog.co.il/en/Article.aspx?id=196 to http://www.tog.co.il/en/Article.aspx?id=196
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Katamon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617063427/http://www.jerusalem.muni.il/jer_sys/picture/atarim/Toursite_form_atarEng.asp?site_id=2251&pic_cat=4&icon_cat=6&york_cat=9&type_id=197 to http://www.jerusalem.muni.il/jer_sys/picture/atarim/Toursite_form_atarEng.asp?site_id=2251&pic_cat=4&icon_cat=6&york_cat=9&type_id=197
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: See discussion at Talk:Jerusalem#Map by neighbourhoods needed. Arminden (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerusalem map by neighbourhoods needed