lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Edges of Twilight

message: There seem to be a lot of stand alone articles on various promotional singles which failed to chart. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, on the grounds that its a better solution than deleting content without independent notability. 11:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 01:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Non notable promotional singles
Talk:The End of the Universe

message: I remember having seen a few times on TV (HBO, maybe comedy central as well) a comedy special with Lewis Black that was based on the same material as this album.  It was neither "Black on Broadway" nor "Red White & Screwed".  I can't find anything for it anymore - does anyone know what the tour was called?
24.58.37.208 (talk) 02:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a Comedy Central Presents performance from 2002, one of three that he's done before he moved on to doing HBO specials.  It didn't have a name.   -/- Warren 06:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What about the tour linked to the album?
Talk:The Fall of Ideals

message: I had an editing error, while I translated accidentally erased the recollection and was wondering if anyone can add  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killingme (talk • contribs) 00:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  forgiveness
Talk:The Family That Plays Together

message: 1st section, "....popular in American and British rhetoric beginning in the 1940's."  Rhetoric? How about "a common expression", a "frequently-quoted saying", or something like that? I think this is a misuse of the term. -- David James, Atlanta  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:33C0:2A70:9C44:83D1:329:3D51 (talk) 12:45, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rhetoric"
Talk:The First Session

message: Why does the CD have ‘Side A’ printed on it? --Mathew5000 (talk) 02:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side A (?) 
Talk:The Fourth Legacy

message: On the http://www.kamelot.com/discography_en_ariel.htm it says that 4th Legacy's from 1999, not 2000. Can someone confirm that?
:I have seen it some times, even with a date (november); and the copyright in the cover says the same... Maybe February of 2000 was the release date of some other edition, but I have to say I have seen this album as released in 1997 and as released in 2002 (I try to know the dates to organize my mp3s and I fix the dates when I'm sure of them). --Metalpotato 08:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: PD: The other link is broken. New link: http://www.kamelot.com/discography.htm and more info here: http://www.kamelot.com/thefourthlegacy.htm --Metalpotato 08:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2000?
Talk:The Fury of The Aquabats!

message: who really played the drums for this? this article says two different things.
Ed 04:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Travis barker or the other guy? 

message: Recorded at?
Mixed by?
Masterized by???
anyone know?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.190.197 (talk) 06:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was this album recorded and who mixed it? 

message: It seems like information about this live recording of the album (mentioned in The Aquabats article) could/should be mentioned in this article somewhere... ~EdGl! 19:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fury of The Aquabats! Live at The Fonda!
Talk:The Genius of Ray Charles

message: Have modified the following weird syntax:
As originally presented, the A side of the album featured the Ray Charles band with David "Fathead" Newman supplemented by players from Count Basie and umpet, and arrangements by Quincy Jones.
but it needs someone else to check if the info. is now correct. Regs., --Technopat 10:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  weird syntax 
Talk:The Getaway (Chris de Burgh album)

message: I am not sure that the narrator in "Borderline" actually "chooses" to flee from his military service, but rather considers to do so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:9A80:2668:BC96:2433:6C5A:54A4 (talk) 07:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Talk:The Ghost of Cain

message: I've removed the following paragraph, as it is unsourced and such sections are discouraged.
The slogan "Only stupid bastards use heroin" can be read on top of the jacket shown on the front-cover, although some parts are hidden by the belt. This slogan was used by the band in the early days to fight the then fashionable drug. (See also liner-notes for 'Heroin' on the B-Sides and Abandoned Tracks album.) UK anarcho-punk band Conflict modified this slogan to give title to their 1986 live-LP 'Only stupid bastards help EMI' released on the meaningful "New Army Records" label. This was an attack against the band and its relationship to their record company. The trademark 'stencil' band name logo was hand painted on to the bottom panel of the jacket by Brett Selby.
~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section
Talk:The Godfather Part III (soundtrack)

message: During the scene when the Corleones arrive in the Corleone village, the horn orchestra is playing Giuseppe Verdi's Va Pensiero from his opera Nabucco. Shouldn't that be listed somewhere?--Kirochi (5/11/2013, 01:20)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.60.170.253 (talk) 23:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nabucco
Talk:The Good Life (EP)

message: This article should be renamed. The words "OZ EP" seem to be merely descriptions that appear on the cover. The official title of the release is The Good Life (see Amazon). The article should be titled The Good Life (EP). Or maybe The Good Life (Weezer) or The Good Life (Weezer EP). -Freekee 21:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Last call for opinions. Barring any replies or suggestions, I'm going to move this page. -Freekee 03:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:Pavlo Lazarenko

message: Delete on sight. - FrancisTyers ·
:I updated the article a little bit and cited some statements, but more citations are needed.--Riurik 22:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ja, ja... Delete on sight, shoot on the spot. Nice strategy... Sashazlv 04:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly sourced

message: Обиход: ГПУ тайно закрыла дело против Лазаренко о получении им взяток от супругов Тимошенко  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.92.140 (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2010 

message: He's now at FCI Terminal Island with a scheduled release date in 2012.  http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServlet?Transaction=NameSearch&needingMoreList=false&FirstName=pavel&Middle=&LastName=lazarenko&Race=U&Sex=U&Age=&x=63&y=19  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.161.91.66 (talk) 22:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prison 
Talk:The Great Divide (Ice Age album)

message: There are many other albums with the same name. I think this one should be renamed. Or it at least needs a link to a disambiguation page. (Also it doesn't appear to be listed on the disambiguation page at the moment.) Elcalen (talk) 12:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title, disambiguation
Talk:The Great Ray Charles

message: I guess this is not a R&B album. I've got the 3 CD boxed set "The Birth of Soul" and it is supposed to include all Atlantic Rhythm and Blues recordings. None of these are included. --Lalli 20:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not R&B

message: I'm not sure if it is useful / important to include the track listing from Rhino Records' 2004 re-issue of The Great Ray Charles that includes 6 tracks from The Genius After Hours.  I removed this later track listing today from The Great Ray Charles article and restored the original LP track listing.  But I preserve the Rhino records re-issue track listing below in case someone feels it should be added to the article:
:All songs written by Ray Charles except as indicated.
#"Dawn Ray" – 5:03
#"The Man I Love" (George Gershwin/Ira Gershwin) – 4:28
#"Music, Music, Music" (Baum/Weiss) – 2:56
#"Black Coffee" (Burke/Webster) – 5:32
#"The Ray" (Jones) – 4:00
#"I Surrender, Dear" (Barris/Clifford) – 5:08
#"Hornful Soul" – 5:30
#"Ain't Misbehavin'" (Brooks/Razaf/Waller) – 5:41
#"Joy Ride" – 4:40
#"Sweet Sixteen Bars" – 4:07
#"Doodlin'" (Silver) – 5:54
#"There's No You" (Adair/Hopper) – 4:47
#"Undecided" (Robin/Shavers) – 3:40
#"My Melancholy Baby" (Burnett/Norton) – 4:20
Pugetbill (talk) 01:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rhino re-issue "two-fers"

message: Apparently there are some versions of this album that include "Ain't Misbehavin'" and do not include "Black Coffee".  (see discussion at   organissimo.org).  I presume "Black Coffee" is the correct track (see www.loc.gov/standards/...)    This is also what appears on photos of the original (?) LP album cover and labels (see listing at  e-bay France)  
Pugetbill (talk) 20:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Black Coffee" vs "Ain't Misbehavin'"
Talk:The Green Book (album)

message: Is this album named after the Green Book from The Abolition of Man or is the similarity just a coincidence?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.193.112.62 (talk) 02:36, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oliver Evans

message: Is there a citation for this quote?  I see him as very different to Watt and really rather closer to being "the Trevithick of America", with their shared push for higher working pressures. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, if you have a look at the uncropped version of the portrait you will see the phrase at the bottom there. I have no information on who exactly first coined the term (after my work on Evans I would not be surprised if the inventor himself suggested it), but nevertheless if you Google "The Watt of America" you will see the saying has stuck and it's even an official variant term for Evans at the Library of Congress. Regardless of the fact that you are quite right in that it is probably not a very apt comparison. Unus Multorum (talk) 21:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Watt of America" 

message: At Oliver Evans#Developing the High-Pressure Steam Engine, 1801–1806  - should this be  --Redrose64 (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing words 

message: the wordage used in this article is not encyclopedic.
we're going to rewrite it and remove the purple prose. Augmented Seventh (talk) 15:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  problematic article
Talk:The Hip-Hop Violinist

message: This article claims this is her debut album. However, her own article has three albums in the discography before this one. So, it is more like fourth album (third if one does not count one which seems to be live recording). 82.141.127.105 (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "debut" album?
Talk:The History of Eric Clapton

message: The liner photos, showing Clapton in all his different hairstyles over the years, would be interesting to have on the webpage.
The Sanity Inspector (talk) 03:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your wish is granted! --Bruce1eetalk 07:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! The Sanity Inspector (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Liner photos

message: The description of the versions of "Tell The Truth" on this compilation relative to the version on "Layla ......" is at odds with the page dedicated to this song. Gwladys24 (talk) 21:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what it is you feel is "at odds" between the two articles. The "Tell the Truth" article discusses the three versions of the song, and expands on what is mentioned here in this article. --Bruce1eetalk 06:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Where I feel they are at odds is in the sentence beginning as follows :"The version that appears on Layla and Other Assorted Love Songs is a combination of these two takes ..." - perhaps, the way I read that is not exactly what you meant to convey(??). Gwladys24 (talk) 01:55, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Tell the Truth" article doesn't discuss the "jam" version in too much depth, and that might be why you feel the articles are at odds with one another. What do you think that sentence should be? --Bruce1eetalk 08:46, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tell The Truth 

message: According to the Guinness book of British Hit Albums (& also the album cover, it seems) there is no "The", the album is just called "History Of Eric Clapton". Gwladys24 (talk) 21:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right, although Allmusic calls it The History ..., which is probably where the title for this article came from. --Bruce1eetalk 06:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Of Eric Clapton
Talk:The Hobbitons

message: I think the article should be merged into a list entry or brief paragraph at Middle-earth music. I agree this does not have the notability for a standalone article. --dab (𒁳) 07:31, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: anon removed prod tag
Talk:The Humility of Pain

message: :Image:0771aa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:0771aa.jpg
Talk:The Hustle (album)

message: <sarcasm> No, of course if I search for 'The Hustle', I am looking for the album by an obscure artist I've never heard of released only two years ago, and not the massively much more popular dance that's been around for 30 years. Great job.</sarcasm>
:Sarcasm aside, I do have to agree with this. WP:NAME addresses the issue of making the primary result the one that people search would most likely be searching for, and this certainly isn't it. Unless someone can provide a good object I'll move this to The Hustle (Album) and relocate Hustle (dance) here or redirect.--Crossmr 03:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Columbus Day storm of 1962

message: Have any of the editors here see anything that relates the Columbus Day Storm to the Pineapple Express? My impression is that the CDS is not closely related; if so, that point should probably be made in this article. However, if the CDS is an example of the PE, that should probably be included in both articles. George H. Taylor implies that the CDS did not tap into the PE phenomenon.  Walter Siegmund (talk) 12:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pineapple Express

message: ...along with a storm infobox to have it fit in with other extratropical cyclones which have entered the project as of late. Thegreatdr 23:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References being added

message: I have no idea when Columbus Day is, but know exactly when October 12 is - I think it would help if the date appears earlier in the introduction than it presently does. Jasper33 17:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a thought

message: Since this storm started as Typhoon Freda, why isn't that included in this article? Shouldn't this article cover the entire life of the storm? 76.66.192.91 (talk) 03:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Freda

message: I know that this storm also did lots of damage in Canada. Specifically it wiped out large numbers of trees in Vancouver's Stanley Park. It seems that this article should include balanced coverage of the impacts of the storm, if college campuses in Oregon loosing trees is enough of an impact, the impact on Vancouver should also be included. 
MADaboutforests (talk) 21:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold and do it.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:46, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada?

message: I looked for top wind speed reports for PDX, but the best I can find is NOAA's extremes which says December 1995 had the strongest wind at 71 mph.  Either the wind moderated substantially between downtown and the airport, or NOAA's record keeping does not go back that far—1980 is mentioned in several other places.  The airport article says it opened in 1959, so it should have had operating wind gauges.  —EncMstr (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  PDX measurements 

message: It seems that the magnitude of this storm could be represented in the percentage of households and businesses that lost power, the duration of that loss of power, and the number of power crews that had to be assembled from out of area to put it all back together again.  From memory it seems it was days.  In reality it varied from place to place.  We picked up tree branches at recess at my school for weeks.  I remember that my dad, who shot the slow motion film of the Beavers-Huskies game in Portland, was horribly annoyed when he got back to Seattle and discovered the footage could not be aired on KOMO for some days because of power outages.  There should be some good info over at Washington HistoryLink on the social effects of the storm.  Also look for a summer baby boomlet? Genehisthome (talk) 07:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power Outages
Talk:The Inhuman Ordeal of Special Agent Gas Huffer

message: Hi I have fixed some grammar but am not going to do much to this page later. If you revert my edits this is fine I am only trying to help. Thanks Hungryce (talk) 00:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What [[User:Hungryce|Hungryce]] ([[User talk:Hungryce|talk]]) 00:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC) did
Talk:The Inner Circle (album)

message: Well, of course they are! Was it supposed to have been a machine doing it? This should be clarified or just deleted. MXVN (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken words of an ACTUAL PERSON?
Talk:The Interzone Mantras

message: One editor wrote: "Unlike the previous album, however, The Interzone Mantras returns to the darker tone and mood of 1997's Transmission."
Implying their value that Triptych is not a "dark album". I tend to disagree, just listen to Triptych again, Touch, Underground, Great Big Lie, Samsara, A Slight Attack, Taking me Away, These Living Arms, Chimera and Gone are as "dark" as anything on Transmission just not angry, rather they have a self-assured maturity about them. Even Heaven Coming Down and The Messenger, those big singles aren't exactly "light". So that's the whole album bar The Halcyon Days! Reexamine the album and reconsider your summary it's definitely as "dark" as anything else they've done. :)AusBruce 02:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triptych not a "dark" album?
Talk:HMAS Tasmania

message: I've just removed a claim from the HMAS Launceston shipindex page that Tasmania was to be commissioned as Launceston in Australian service, but this was called of. Iff reliable sources for this claim can be found, it'd be an interesting addition to the article, but I'm skeptical. -- saberwyn 23:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential renaming of ship?
Talk:The Jacksons Story

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 10:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Legion of Mary: The Jerry Garcia Collection, Vol. 1

message: I propose renaming this article, from "The Jerry Garcia Collection, Vol 1: Legion of Mary", to "Legion of Mary: The Jerry Garcia Collection, Vol. 1".  The main part of the album's name is "Legion of Mary".  The part about the Jerry Gacia collection is the subtitle, so it should come second.  Note also the addition of a period after "Vol".  Per Wikipedia:Article titles#Common names, "Articles are normally titled using the most common English-language name of the subject of the article."  More people will be looking for the article under the name "Legion of Mary", so that's a second reason to put that part of the name first.  Besides that, if anyone creates an article about volume 2, I think it should be called "Let It Rock: The Jerry Garcia Collection, Vol. 2".  — Mudwater (Talk) 00:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been two weeks and no one has said anything about this, so I'm going ahead with the rename. — Mudwater (Talk) 01:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rename
Talk:The Kansas Boxed Set

message: Play-time is required for the track "The Pinnacle." Also not sure if the song titles should be formatted with lowercase "Of"'s and "The"'s ("Child Of Innocence" vs. "Child of Innocence", for example).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.29.210.174 (talk) 18:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Kenny Rogers Story

message: In reply to the PROD I just removed, The Kenny Rogers Story was a U.K. only release hence the difficulty in finding reliable sources.  However, LyricsFreak refers to the album as reaching #1 on the U.K. charts and still being at #2 four years later.  See here.  CycloneGU (talk) 02:23, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Late update edit: I've been corrected on the prior source as it is a Wikipedia mirror.  Didn't notice that down the page...in any case, I'll look for a better information for a source on the album notability, but being on the charts for four years and at #1 for part of it is certainly notable in its own right, even for a UK-only release.  I'll come back to this article.  CycloneGU (talk) 03:32, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Album Reference
Talk:The Kink Kronikles

message: The point about Holiday in Waikiki is interesting (No, I hadn't noticed the mistake until you pointed it out.) but it can't be due to any CD rerelease, as Ned Mendelsohn was writing long before our current digital world.  No, I have no alternate explanation for his flubbing that detail. IanHistor 16:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Current version of the article implies that "King King" was previously unreleased worldwide, as was "Did You See His Name?".  "King Kong" was, in fact, a 1969 British single, the B-Side to "Plastic Man."
Sojambi Pinola (talk) 17:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: King Kong is not "original to this album"