lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Honda Z

message: I changed this back from subcompact to small. Subcompact has no meaning to me (UK), but the link to subcompact says that it is equivalent to a supermini. This car is smaller than a super mini. It is bigger than a smart and a similar size to an original mini. -- SGBailey 14:36, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 1970s Honda Z

message: Can someone find the original source for the 90's Z info? This seems like a horrible machine translation. Optix (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 90's Z info?

message: 1971 Z600, personal experience, at freeway speed of 73mph the engine was spinning 7300rpm, 300 above redline... as such I question the 103mph claim at the salt flats as this would be around 10,000rpm without a pressurized intake manifold, and this does not sound possible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.28.29.200 (talk) 20:26, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps (imagine!) they changed the gearing.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 19:11, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

text: The tires look taller than stock. did your car have a 4 or 5 speed?  ............Wondering about the engine specks. Up to 36hp with the 360cc, and 36hp with the 600cc. Of course the 600 should have more torque. Also it mentions the 360 went to water cooling in '71, what about the 600? Was it water or air cooled? I've seen it listed as air cooled but there doesn't seem to be any fan or shroud.Flight Risk (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Gearing, top speed
Talk:Julio César Turbay Ayala

message: Where's the information about Turbay's so-called Estatuto de Seguridad y Derechos Humanos ("Security and Human Rights Statute")? Without it, the article remains kinda biased, I think. --Julián Ortega - drop me a message 14:40, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, of course it needs to be there since it was a big part of Turbay's government, controversial that it was. As far as my own contributions, I personally haven't added information about it yet simply because I decided to begin with slightly less complex issues. Other than that, I don't see why it shouldn't be mentioned and treated according to Wikipedia's guidelines. As it is, the article is still incomplete and mostly a stub, hence the bias lies mostly in a lack of information at large. Juancarlos2004 18:59, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Estatuto de Seguridad y Derechos Humanos
Talk:Yu Yamada

message: is this the same person? i dont have japanese font support or input here, which makes looking it up a little tough. Nateji77 14:57, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's her. --DannyWilde 15:11, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: ok. adding it to links. Nateji77 15:15, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I found her there but the information is very minimal, only one TV show - I don't think it's worth linking to. Here is one more link: http://www.jdorama.com/artiste.1504.htm. This is the same photo as on the site I already added, but it's in English. --DannyWilde 15:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Randall G. Hassell

message: I attempted to wikify this page. If a more experienced wikipedian happens to look it over, and could give a few pointers I would appreciate it. Thanks! --Charlie(@CIRL | talk) 04:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikifying 
Talk:Melvin Burgess

message: Is Junk the same book as Smack? --Tydaj 15:23, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they are the same book.  It was published "Junk" in the U.K. and "Smack" in the U.S. 205.250.51.238 00:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is he related to Anthony Burgess? --Onias 21:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anthony Burgess
Talk:List of Atari ST games

message: How many games are here? I assume this list is very incomplete? 2fort5r (talk) 19:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking the same thing. I've added a few and I'm still working on it.Ray and jub (talk) 11:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zapatista History

message: Sadly the Modeern Zapatista entry has reached the point of having been edited by so many opinionated individuals that it no longer provides much in the way of impartial information. Naturally this is a topic that will draw much enthusiasm and passion, but to present it as it stands does a disservice to all.  The above unsigned comment was added by User:192.220.129.149 on18:18, 1 May 2006. -- Draeco 04:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: As info on both incarnations of the Zapatistas is well covered elsewhere, I thought this should be a souped-up disambiguation page.  As such, I rewrote it slightly, removing not-verifiable stuff, and removing the stub tag (any developments would be redundant).
However, a string of IP addresses has re-added stuff, added more stuff, put in an enormous string of links, and re-stubbed it.  Unfortunately, I haven't got the time to edit Wikipedia normally, never mind re-fiddle about with this article.  Grayum 15:53, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I think this should just be a redirect page, no more. regards 84.164.80.235 09:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Split and Redirect. I propose Zapatista (Mexican Revolution) and Zapatista (EZLN) (maybe Zapatista (modern) would be more appropriate, but I like to think Wikipedia will be timeless). The Zapatistas from the Revolution and those affiliated with the EZLN are two different groups that should be treated with two separate articles. - Draeco 04:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: I have created a disambiguation page to three good zapatista articles and have merged zapatista history with that page in the form of a redirect. Jasper23 18:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation and Redirect
Talk:Metropolitan Board of Works

message: There are a number of buildings with "MBW" on them - a fire station, now a supermarket, opposite Liverpool Street Station and a building in Bethnal Green. Jackiespeel 15:56, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: MBW

message: What became of Spring Gardens? Jackiespeel 18:02, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: After the abolition of the Board it was used as the headquarters of the London County Council. After the building of County Hall, the LCC met there instead of Spring Gardens, which was used as ancillary office space. The original lease for the land was 100 years from 1858 and so it expired in 1958 and the building reverted to the Crown. It was used as office space by central government departments for a few years then remained vacant until it was agreed that the site should be used for a new headquarters for the British Council. The building was demolished in 1971. David | Talk 20:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spring Gardens

message: The earliest issues of Whitaker's Almanack make reference to the appalling presentation of accounts of the MBW - afterwards admitting that this was the fault of the accountant. Jackiespeel 19:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accounts

message: These are large documents, 'individually bagged and then boxed up' with other plans. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:31, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Plans

message: For how long did the MBW meet at Guildhall - given that they had a building to move into? Jackiespeel (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meetings at Guildhall
Talk:London County Council

message: There are a number of buildings with "LCC" on them. These include various council housing (including examples at Bethnal Green and fire stations (including close to Euston station and Waterloo Station - this latter being decommissioned). Jackiespeel 15:57, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: LCC on buildings

message: I am a little confused whether these were the same thing. On Wikipedia it is stated that Ronald Collet Norman was leader of the council from 1915-1918. However his obituary in The Times states he was chairman from 1918-19- does anyone know whether the position of leader and chairman was considered the same? Forbear 21:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were not the same. The Chairman was a formal position which was analagous to the Mayor of a Borough, and the Chairman symbolically represented the council as well as being a figurehead. However the Chairman did not (certainly after the early years) have any political role. The Leader was, until 1934, an informal position which was equivalent to the political leader of the majority party on the LCC. R.C. Norman received the Chairmanship at the end of his Leadership, possibly as an honour, possibly to get him out of the way. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 14:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Leaders/Chairmen?

message: Much needs to be done to improve this article - there is nothing on the reorganisation of 1899-1900, or the factors that led to the 1963 Act and the formation of the GLC. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Such as the fact that it did not extend to cover areas east of the River Lee - West Ham and East Ham remained parts of Essex until 1965  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.169.122 (talk) 10:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Development of article
Talk:Red Jacket

message: Why is Red Jacket characterized as having been an apologist for the native religion? If you read the speech, you can see that it's dripping with sarcasm and is in fact a scathing indictment of whites as liars, murderers and cheats, and an outright rebuke and rejection of a religion he sees as at best an inferior one that doesn't prevent the hypocracy of its believers being such murderes and cheats, and at worst being just another way to defraud and victimize the natives.
:Refer to the traditional meaning of apologetics, not the contemporary sense of apologizing, and that's exactly what he's doing. Pollinator 16:35, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I largely agree with this. As I read it, he did compared all the christian talk about "Love thy neighbour" to how it effected the followers and promised to keep an open mind if positive effects should show in the future. Basically he said "First put your actions where your mouth is, than we'll see". 84.146.111.179 (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Writer stubs

message: Why do only the Finnish writer stubs show up as a subcategory but not, e.g., the Canadian writer stubs or the French writer stubs or the Pirate writer stubs?--Carabinieri 16:25, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: By default subcats are sorted alphabeticaly too, so in a big cat like this with only A and maybe B showing on the first page they are not listed untill you browser to the apropriate part of the list, that is F for French writer stubs for example. You can alter the sorting by adding a sort key to the category code, wich is what was probably done to Finnish writers in order to make them show up first (well right now I only see cartoon writer stubs). --Sherool 23:57, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How can I creat an article for a writer / blogger Globng (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helpme
Talk:Hannu Toivonen

message: Does he have any relation to WRC driver Henri Toivonen?  --72.189.30.233 20:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christopher Null

message: This article was nominated for deletion. The result was: no consensus. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Null. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD

message: I've read some of his movie reviews. While I know this is considered poor taste, I find the man to be lacking a certain depth and experience in his life that would allow him to adequately review a movie. I think he is just elitist and has an inflated ego, so much so that he founded Filmcritic.com. Critics should have a familiarity with humanity, literature, and such and he has desolved it down into only "Did I like this movie or not?" - Cyborg Ninja 03:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: [For] example, his views on Nakata's 'Ring' (1998)  "Ring is very atmospheric and often creepy, especially in its last half hour, but it's hardly chilling enough to keep you up at night." Concentrate on the movie next time, not your popcorn and iPhone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.82.124.197 (talk) 09:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a forum. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 03:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: About Null

message: in reference to http://www.wired.com/2015/05/google-wont-let-forget-divorce/ and https://twitter.com/christophernull/status/596381664252731392.  I think this is a notable event. Thoughts? 73.38.55.164 (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: suggestion: the google card divorce debacle
Talk:North Springs High School

message: *Someone who is familiar with the topic, please expand with more inputs. --Bhadani 16:52, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I have removed the contact information for the adminstrators because the WikiProject Schools page says that "Generally timeless information (such as published teachers) is preferred over transitory information."
Earlopogous 22:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: contact information

message: I was at the high school at the same time as three of the so-called "notable alumni."  Calling a person 'award-winning' or 'upcoming' without further explanation or providing a source does not qualify anyone as "notable."  The notable alumni section is for people who are "notable" in the sense defined by WP:NOTABILITY.  The fact that other school entries also include non-notable alumni does not justify putting non-notable alumni here.  I might call myself "upcoming trial lawyer" or "award-winning basketball player."  Both would be true, but neither makes me notable.
I think that Greg Bluestein should absolutely be included. https://www.ajc.com/staff/greg-bluestein/. If the dude from Dukes of Hazard is on here, Greg should totally be on this list.
Should those people ever become truly notable, they may be re-added to the page.  Otherwise, the notable alumni page should be reserved for the truly noteworthy.Niremetal 03:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For the sake of clarity, the alumni I was referring to are Lisa Zimmerman, Alan Gilmer, and Jason Geigerman.  I have removed all three of their names from the section. Niremetal 03:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  A couple hints on this point: 1) If a Google search for your name turns up absolutely nothing about you, you're not notable; 2) someone isn't noteworthy just because they made some money on the stock market and are in charge of a company no one's heard of.  So yeah.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.244.83 (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Notable" Alumni

message: Currently, this Wikipedia page says the school is located in Sandy Springs AND Atlanta. Which is correct? 12.30.109.2 (talk) 06:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandy Springs or Atlanta?
Talk:Riesel number

message: "To show that a number is a Riesel number, one must find a 'covering set'. A covering set is a set of small prime numbers that will divide any member of a sequence, so called because it is said to 'cover' that sequence."
There are at least three necessary conditions for that statement:
* there's no such thing as a nonconstructive proof that a number is Riesel
* one can define "small"
* every Riesel number even has a finite covering set - can't there be one whose sequence of smallest factors is unbounded?
Does anybody have a proof of any of these statements? -- Smjg 16:54, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose "small" here would simply be finite.  Depending on the exact definition of covering set used, I could see an argument for them, but if the definition is that broad (lacking a proof of your first and third points) then I can't see any justification for talking about them, because they could be too unwieldy to work with.  I've changed the wording in the article to reflect the possibility of nonconstructive proofs; anyone with proofs for your first or third points should add them to the article. CRGreathouse 22:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The burden of proof is on us for implying that every Riesel number can be shown with this method, if it's true that numbers don't have a finite covering set when the sequence of smallest factors is unbounded. If we can't find proof that it will work for all the numbers, we should only discuss methods that will. The existing material is unsourced, after all, it doesn't need immunity. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 13:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Covering Set

message: It would be good to have the reference to Riesel's original work.  Two web sites suggest  but I can't verify that (it isn't in ZMATH).  Richard Pinch (talk) 06:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original reference 

message: See the link Riesel number base 2 remain, there are also 2 even ks remained: 351134 and 478214.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.8.115.141 (talk) 11:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remained even ''k''
Talk:International Skating Union

message: Needs to discuss the declining ratings in the U.S., prompting ABC Sports not to renew their contract. The resulting loss of revenue (the largest source) forced ISU to cut prize money, among other things... --Pelladon 02:22, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole thing sounds like a sanitized advertisement.Nodekeeper (talk) 08:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Such as 3000 meter relay - short track...???--124.78.215.168 (talk) 08:32, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monograph of rules for each event....???
Talk:*Kʷetwóres rule

message: Could we please have:
*the reference for Rix 1990
*complete bibliographical references for Mottausch and Klingenschmitt
*glosses for the words
*an explanation of why these forms are believed to have originally had initial stress
*justification of the assumption that posttonic  became  before this rule
*more detail of what Mottausch is proposing
Thanks! --Angr/ 17:00, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: Is it known if Greek tésseres was excluded from the rule, or was it a secondary reversion? Do other Greek words generally show the shift?  —Soap— 14:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek
Talk:Robert Russa Moton

message: I placed a new biography for this man at Robert Russa Moton/Temp, based on the public domain U.S. gov't publication: The Moton Family: A Register of Its Papers in the Library of Congress.
Either replace the original article with this one, or if the original turns out to be okay, merge them.
— Eoghanacht talk 17:00, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporary subpage

message: It is common, in some places, to use a footnote to add a colorful anecdote, or additional explanatory material, not fitting into the flow of the main document. That practice is generally not encouraged in Wikipedia, as far as I can tell. I posed the question here. While the full community has obviously not weighed in, the consensus appears to me that quotes should be revered for two related classes of use:
# In a case where there may be controversy about a particular fact, and whether the cited reference supports that fact, the use of the quote will make it easier for readers and editors to reach their own conclusion, by citing the specific quote used to support the fact. This is particularly important where a reference may be not online, or behind a pay wall.
# When an opinion is paraphrased, the quote will help readers and editors determine whether the paraphrase is accurate.
This article did have a quote in a footnote, and it is my opinion that the quote does not support either use listed above, thus I have removed it, or truncated it. Should anyone disagree, or feel that there are other examples of allowable quotes, feel free to start a discussion. I suggest here, if you disagree with my conclusion that this quote doesn't fall into one of those two examples, or at Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content#.22brief_verbatim_textual_excerpts.22_revisited if you feel there should be other allowed uses. --SPhilbrick(Talk) 20:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote in footnote removed 
Talk:Katey Sagal

message: What do we know about Fred Lombardo (a musician), the person that various celebrity info websites purport to be Katey Sagal's second husband, from 1986 to 1989? I can find nothing about him. Who did he perform music with?  If not matrimony, was there at least a relationship?  Did he even exist? Jeff in CA (talk) 23:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts about Fred Lombardo?
Category talk:Migratory birds (Western Hemisphere)

message: I'm not even convinced there needs to be separate eastern and western migratory subcategories, but I did it. Greater bird brains than mine can decide to combine them if appropriate.
Feel free to add or subtract birds from these categories, I was going to add some NA waterfowl to the list. Snafflekid 17:07, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Migratory birds (Eastern Hemisphere)

message: I'm not even convinced there needs to be separate eastern and western migratory subcategories, but I did it. Greater bird brains than mine can decide to combine them if appropriate.
Feel free to add or subtract birds from these categories, I was going to add some NA waterfowl to the list. Snafflekid 17:07, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Vicenza

message: Andrea Palladio was born in Padua and lived there until the age of 15. I don't know if you can speak of him as a native of Vicenza. Errabee 17:22, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Andrea Palladio

message: Can someone put an IPA pronunciation for the city name ? 
12.149.39.84 18:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: [ v i c e n ts a]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.40.191 (talk) 12:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA 

message: Why is it connected to Vicenza? I do not see any traces of it in the Vicenza page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.94.135.41 (talk) 16:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Name Ilvo Diamanti 

message: The article says "it was the most damaged city in Veneto by Allied bombings". Does this mean:
*in World War I (in which case "Allied" should be linked to Allies of World War I),
*in World War II (in which case "Allied" should be linked to Allies of World War II), or
*in both wars (in which case "Allied" can stay linked to Allied).
Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 09:38, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allied bombings 

message: This seems simply untrue. The Italian Wikipedia does say that the province of Vicenza is the third-largest for exports, but this article is about the city. And the references given do not support the statement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by METRANGOLO1 (talk • contribs) 08:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Vicenza is the third-largest Italian industrial centre"  

message: "Vicenza is a thriving and cosmopolitan city, with a rich history and culture" - just out of curiosity, do we have any articles stating that a city has poor history and culture? If not...then what's the point? --Ehitaja (talk) 09:38, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rich culture" 

message: 1. "Oratory of San Nicola da Tolentino: finished in 1678 on commission of the fraternity of St. Nicholas, it is a chapel that houses a series of paintings focused on the life of the saint, among the highest levels of the measured Baroque of Vicenza."
What does "highest levels of the measured Baroque of Vicenza" mean?
2. The Biblioteca Civica Bertoliana appears under the list of secular buildings and the one of libraries. That is redundant.
3. The image of the baccalà alla vicentina is pretty bad: it's out of focus and it has poor lighting. Can somebody replace it with a better photograph?
ICE77 (talk) 19:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions and comment