lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Morgan Park, Duluth, Minnesota

message: This article needs more information in Morgan Park, rather than US Steel. I understand the company's operation were critical to the workforce, but the community (and its residents and facilities) is the subject of the article. Questions to explore may be the nature of the housing onsite (range of models, size, etc.), ethnic makeup of residents over the decades, history of the transition to allowing other residents who were not employees of the Duluth Works, the effect of the Depression on the community, challenges for the city in operating the site and integrating it into city services. Did it start charging property taxes? Does the school still operate? did people buy their houses from the 1930s on?Parkwells (talk) 15:41, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs expansion
Talk:Mount Reunion

message: While this name exists in older sources, it is not recognized by the GNIS and may not be accurate. There are several other peaks in Minnesota like this (Mallmann's Peak and Mount Northrop) and I'm looking into either submitting them or potentially removing the relevant articles as no longer accurate. Nsteffel (talk) 16:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Issue
Talk:Air Tigers

message: Summary of capabilities is more like an analyst and less like a encyclopedia based on facts.
 Rewording is needed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.61.86.92 (talk) 17:39, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Section
Talk:Park Point (Minnesota)

message: ==Merged==
The two sections have been merged.  The Park Point (Minnesota) article has not been deleted. (Chris Light (talk) 16:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

message: The contents on Park Point (Minnesota) and Minnesota Point somewhat overlap each other. --Dan Leveille (talk) 18:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Opposed merger Minnesota Point is a geographical feature and is probably use by the government as such.Thanks-RFD (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Paul Bunyan State Trail

message: map?
would a map of the trail be a good idea? offtopic but i wish they would have had more of the path paved north of lake bemidji, after the highway crossing it just turns into a gravel path that looked as if ATVs where the primary user.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.235.92.237 (talk) 04:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:National Government (1931)

message: There is noone with 4 stars?? Are there no members or is there an error
--82.12.246.43 (talk) 21:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  **** = Member of the Liberal National Party 

message: For the first National Government, would the Labour members not be better classified as Labour (with red) rather than National Labour? When the government was formed in August 1931, they were all members of the Labour Party and in fact National Labour did not exist. It wasn't created until an election was on the cards. All the evidence is that the Labour members intended to return to their party until they were expelled on 28th September. Therefore, would it not make sense for the Labour members of the government to be listed as Labour members as this is what they were when the government was formed - then like the Liberal John Pybus there can be a note saying they were expelled and joined the newly created National Labour group? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porphrogenita (talk • contribs) 08:07, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification of Labour members
Talk:Mother (disambiguation)

message: *http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Mother&diff=167652944&oldid=167643635
Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 16:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please see

message: The usage of "Mother series" is under discussion, see talk:EarthBound_(series) -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 03:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Mother series}}"
Talk:Landmark Theatres

message: There is a chain in Canada called Landmark Cinemas, with multi-screen locations in some smaller cities - e.g. Abbotsford and Kelowna, BC. I don't think this is the same chain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.11.77 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada chain

message: The intro copy-pastes PRspeak from a 2010 version of the company web site. Aside from violating WP:Copy-paste, it's badly out of date, since the chain no longer specializes that way. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 16:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly Out of Date Copy Paste
Talk:Nico Mirallegro

message: Any constructive feedback from the Actors bio Work Group is appreciated.  Please note that this subject is still a young man (25 years old as of January 2016), and does not have published memoirs or biographies.  Overwhelmingly, the references pertaining to him come from U.K. newspapers and entertainment sources.  References from respected U.K. news sources (e.g., theguardian.com) are used as available.  If the article appears effusive in part, it is because the news coverage of Mirallegro, and reviews of his acting, have been quite laudatory. Cresconius (talk) 01:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

message: Much of whats listed is here is not relevant or needed and reads like a tabloid magazine. There were several pictures of things that had nothing to do with Nico, and i removed them, but the page needs a lot more clean up in order to be up to par. There are lots of parts that are completely subjective (for example it listed "gave an exemplary" or "remarkable" or something like that performance in reference to his role in Common?) and give way too detailed information concerning the shows and movies he starred in as well as the criticism he has received from random publications. Many things are also not cited. Too many quotations as well, and detail when links to the shows themselves could just be provided.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.237.200 (talk) 06:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant Info 

message: The paragraph above is partly correct but overbroad in its criticisms, and resulted in unnecessary gutting of what had been a better page.  Some of what was deleted should be retrieved. Eastmeon (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Gutting Article

message: Appeared in Ridley (ITV) as Cal. 18th September 2022. Please add. Percy2345 (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridley
Talk:Vermilion Range (Minnesota)

message: I've never done any sort of editing at Wikipedia - I really don't know what I'm doing.
But in case anyone sees this:
The Vermilion Iron formation is NOT part of the proterozic Animikie Group. The Vermilion Iron formation is Archean (early preCambrian). The Vermilion Iron formation is pre-Algoman orogany, the other (Amimikie Group) Minnesota iron formations are post-Algoman orogany.
This same error appears at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animikie_Group
Please pardon any spelling errors.
208.85.39.42 (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

message: The article title and body are correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.128.142.233 (talk) 03:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Lake Superior Iron Ranges" map used with the article spells "Vermilion" improperly.
Talk:Vicksburg, Minnesota

message: Only a handful of online sources agree with the spelling Vicksberg. What do print sources say? Ntsimp (talk) 04:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Geographic Names Information System at the United States Geological Survey says Vicksburg, so I moved the article. Unfortunately, they don't give any geographical coordinates for the place. The closest listing is for Vicksburg Cemetery, which is at . Backspace (talk) 20:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of the name?
Talk:Victory, Minneapolis

message: "By contrast with many of the surrounding neighborhoods, Victory residents enjoy ... a superior school system".  
What justifies this statement?  They are part of the same Minneapolis Public Schools (Special School District #1) that covers all of Minneapolis.  Even if this was saying that the the one school located in Victory neighborhood (Loring) are superior, that hardly matters, since Minneapolis students attend schools all over the city, depending on the specific programs they choose. T-bonham (talk) 00:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and removed the statement. If someone really objects they can discuss it here. Eco84 | Talk 15:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  superior school system?? 

message: There is twice as much content about a single church in the neighborhood as the main article. It doesn't really seem pertinent to the article and I don't think it's neutral content.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.243.147 (talk) 11:44, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Austin
Talk:Modern Times Group

message: Modern Times Group Do you know the name? 83.142.1.165 (talk) 15:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the way MTG lists their channels. The "free-to-air" channels are those that are mostly funded by advertising, while the pay channels mostly rely on subscribtion fees. I've edited the article to clarify this. Väsk 18:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Should we convert the timeline from a list to a prose section called history?  RJFJR (talk) 15:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: The deal hasn't gone through yet. Citing the MTG press release "European broadcast giant Modern Times Group (MTG) has agreed the purchase of Latvian free-TV operator LNT, subject to approval by the country’s competition authorities." The respective authority is the Council of Competition  which has four months to decide, whether they are letting through the purchase. Gragox (talk) 15:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  LNT 
Talk:Spanish ship San Juan Nepomuceno

message: The following text had been clumsily inserted into the article, but it clearly refers to a different ship and belongs elsewhere:
The Spanish packet, San Juan Nepomuceno, was also used to transport imigrants from the Canary Islands to Louisiana in 1778 when Louisiana was a Spanish colony under Governor Bernardo de Galves. 
The ship, under the command of Captain Don Domingo Morera, embarked the island of Tenerife on December 9,1778 enroute to the port of New Orleans via Havana, Cuba. There were 202 passengers, 53 were recruits, 48 of which had families. In all, there were about 2010 Islanders, or Islenos as they are still referred to, on 7 ships from November 1778 to May 1779. 
The Spanish Crown commanded Galves to inlist seven hundred men from the Canary Islands ot protect the colony from the British who were planning to invade and occupy the Province of Louisians. 
When the recruits arrived with there large families, Galves was forced to use them as buffer settlements and to form a mitilia.
I've recorded it here, as is, in case someone feels this information is worthwhile, though it seems to be an incident in Louisiana colonial history rather than a ship's career.
--Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 02:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information which did not belong in this article 

message: Very different fate recorded here as opposed to what this article is saying. 
See https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=tEmCbStqqtwC&pg=PA73-IA20&lpg=PA73-IA20&dq=HMS+San+Juan.+Fate:+Paid+off+%26+sold+8+January+1816.&source=bl&ots=jJOGtB5V9A&sig=P_bPWzpI8xytY7la_cA8DAcDc1U&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjzu9KGlezZAhUUesAKHRk_BgUQ6AEIQDAD#v=onepage&q&f=false
 BeckenhamBear (talk) 15:56, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: The fate of HMS San Juan
Talk:Christ Chapel

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:Minnesota stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.
*The spire was blown off in the tornado. A year or two later it was damaged again and was slanted.Leafyplant 23:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Legal education in the Philippines

message: Just an honest and sincere observation, and I hope this doesn't offend anyone. I noticed that some law schools listed under the category are already not existing (i.e. defunct). Here's my query: How can an educational institution be called "old" if its already non-existent? I'm sure these defunct schools were listed due to the significant contribution that it may have made in Philippine legal education, but should it be listed under the category of oldest law schools or should another category be made for it?  Would appreciate an objective discussion on this topic.--Aclarado (talk) 13:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest law schools
Talk:Guggenheim Building

message: I wonder if this building meets notability guidelines?  It doesn't have any unusual architectural features, it isn't historically important.  It isn't well known outside of its city. I have doubts that this article will ever grow beyond stub class.  SlowJog (talk) 19:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think merging it into Mayo Clinic is fine. Jonathunder (talk) 23:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can agree with such a merger.  However, the Mayo Clinic article seems surprisingly weak for such a prominent institution.  At this time, I'm not sure such a merger would improve that article.  I suggest an separate article on the Mayo Campus, or Mayo Campuses.  SlowJog (talk) 01:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Ralph Engelstad Arena (Minnesota)

message: I edited the page, it said that this arena played host to the 2005 World Juniors.  The other Engelstad Arena in Grand Forks did, not the Thief River arena.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.107.232.233 (talk) 04:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Cave (pub)

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:Minnesota stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.
hi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.92.148.125 (talk) 05:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Shanghai Daily

message: Compare the following....
* http://live.shanghaidaily.com/classified_list.asp?class=180
* http://classifieds.news.com.au/?site=nbcm&publicationid=nbcm
--222.64.29.88 (talk) 00:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classifieds is not up to the international taste ....
Talk:Percy Anderson (designer)

message: A subpage at Percy Anderson/fjc was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 12:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. There is consensus for the article to move to Percy Anderson (designer), with creation of a disambiguation page at Percy Anderson. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 08:26, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Percy Anderson →  – I can't see how this is PRIMARYTOPIC as opposed to Percy Anderson (judge). Here are the pageviews. In my opinion, there is no PRIMARY and so a DAB page should be created at the base name.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 11:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 August 2021
Talk:Thompson Road, Melbourne

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style 
Talk:Wenhui–Xinmin United Press Group

message: To the actual, grammatically-correct, and   name: Wenhui–Xinmin United Press Group. An editor unfamiliar with the company's history mistakenly moved the page based on some semi-official Chinglish and that's since spread through pages copying Wikipedia, but this was the merger of the Wenhui Daily and the Xinmin Evening News and both terms get capitalized. — LlywelynII 10:20, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Rassvet (ISS module)

message: Why was it decided that the module would be launched by NASA as opposed to the Russian space agency? Was it due to the Shuttle's payload capabilities or international cooperation used in the ISS program? Dreammaker182 (talk) 17:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's basically an exchange of services between NASA and the Russian space agency; NASA carries Rassvet (and MLM outfitting) on the Shuttle, and Russians take US astronauts aboard Soyuz flights. 88.85.134.42 (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a little more then that. NASA and Roscosmos had a deal pre-Columbia to carry a module or 2 on shuttle. Post-Columbia it was modified, that shuttle would carry MRM-1 in order to be able to complete the U.S. Orbital segment of the ISS. It actually has nothing to do with RSA carrying NASA astro's, USA is paying Russia ~$52 million/seat. Its more of a barter deal for cargo on Progress, NASA carries Rassvet and Russia delivers some cargo on Progress. There is more in the deal but that's the main jist of it.--NavyBlue84 23:38, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rassvet on Shuttle... 

message: I noticed that progress ms 17 will remove  nauka nadir docking adapter  for prichal module but who removed zarya nadir docking adapter for Rassvet nadir I see no progress mentioning its disposal please tell if someone remembers or can find out Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who removed docking adapter on zarya nadir 
Talk:St. Louis County Road 7

message: In a recent AfD it has been suggested that all St. Louis County Roads's article be merged in a list. There are very similar articles, that may stand as a list but not by themselves. Current articles are about roads number: 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 13, 16, 32, 37, 48, 56, 61, 90, and 91. Possibly more may be found in Category:St._Louis_County - Nabla (talk) 12:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than the title listed on the merge tags, wouldn't it be better to entitle the merge target something like "List of county roads in St. Louis County, Minnesota"?  The title on the merge tags would serve St. Louis County, Missouri equally well, and therefore is ambiguous.  Nyttend (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I was simply following up AfD's suggestion to merge, and simply generalised the titles. I'm Portuguese, I'm certainly not immediatelly aware of every county in the US. By the way, I doubt we need lists of every county road in the world. - Nabla (talk) 22:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed the merge. Good job! - Nabla (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge St. Louis County Roads
Talk:Gregory M. Herek

message: While James Cantor was contesting my removal of an EL that he had added to his coworker, I looked into some of the many other ELs that he has added, and found that many of them were to his own blog, those of coworkers and, or colleagues. The EL to Gregory M. Herek's blog, which James Cantor added to two pages seemed not to be conflicted until I noticed that both Herek and Cantor were editors of the same magazine. Thoughts? BitterGrey (talk) 21:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undisclosed COI 
Talk:Yeasayer

message: Moved from main article, hopefully can be milked for a few further facts, or added to info box. Wwwhatsup (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: should the 'gmd' be added as a new section for the bands entry on wikipedia?  i think it is worth a mention.24.213.220.161 (talk) 00:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  sounds like a troll attack - no references provided etc --Richlv (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I dunno, I saw yeasayer at austin and denver and saw at least three different people with 'GMD' t-shirts on (said gross motor) on the back at each show.  Not sure what it means. I came to this page to try to find out.12.68.63.194 (talk) 23:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  gross motor discretion 

message: i'd suggest changing phrase "first came to national attention"
while for many it would be decipherable that usa is meant there, for many it would be "um, which nation is that speaking about ?" --Richlv (talk) 19:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  national attention 

message: Based on this article in Williamette Weekly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willamette_Week by Casey Jarmen http://wweek.com/portland/event-56547-yeasayer_smith_weste.html
other reviews by Casey Jarmen mentioned in Wikipedia for verifiability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AgesandAges http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abadawn
--Scratchy7929 19:17, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Electro-pop as a genre