lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Meeting of Minds

message: There are two distinct entities here that should each have their own separate pages and be disambiguated. The first, and I think correct for the current title, is the top section that refers to Steve Allen's original writing, scripts and television productions of those scripts, for MEETING OF MINDS. 
What is misleading in the extreme here is the second section that is a barely-couched ad for a (presumably) current attempt to re-mount these scripts as live performances around the country, marketed to educational institutions and the like, with no reference to the production company, booking agent, lists of actors that have no commitment to any such performance,  or even clarification that, aside from using Allen's scripts, it in no way relates to the original filmed series from 3 decades ago.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvengac (talk • contribs) 05:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TALK: MEETING OF MINDS disambiguation
Talk:Thierry Henry

message: Wenger stated lots of times that he did not buy Henry to replace Anelka. His original plan was to play they together up front. In the end Anelka wanted to leave but Arsene still wanted Henry. 155.4.133.194 (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume your comment refers to the line "Brought in as a replacement for fellow French forward Nicolas Anelka, Henry […]" in the section "1999–2007: Move to Arsenal, breakthrough, and success". That statement is supported by an WP:inline citation, an article by the The Observer: https://web.archive.org/web/20120115044738/http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2004/oct/03/newsstory.sport1.  We would need sources supporting those claims. Can you supply them? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a replacement for Anelka
Talk:Wojciech Rostafiński

message: Wiecej informacji na temat Wojciecha Rostafińskiego - Powstanie 44, strona 706 i 799. More infos about Wojciech Rostafinski, see: Rising '44: The Battle for Warsaw, pages 706 and 799 (Polish version)--Emax 14:07, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Monty Norman

message: About the "Dum de-de-dum-dum, dum dum dum, dum de-de dum dum, dum dum dum" in the article - would someone please do this up on a musical staff and post the image? That would make it easier to recognize. - Brian Kendig 14:35, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, that is how Monty Norman describes it on his website - . -- ALoan (Talk) 15:43, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter; It doesn't help the uninitiated and distracts from the article.  --Alexwcovington 01:16, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've appended a clarify template to the last sentence of the "Biography" section, which makes the claim:
:"As of 2004, Norman is working on an autobiography, to be entitled A Walking Stick Full of Bagels, and musical versions of the 1954 Kingsley Amis novel, Lucky Jim, and his 1970s musical, Quick Quick Slow."  
As written, it is stating in no uncertain terms that he "is working on... [a] musical version... of... his 1970s musical."  This does not make sense.  Can someone with knowledge of Norman's current activities please clarify this statement?  If Quick Quick Slow is already a musical, how can he possibly be working on a "musical version" of it?  The statement requires clearer phrasing or more careful word choices. 71.200.89.119 (talk) 13:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical musical?? 

message: I separated all of Norman's involvement with the James Bond theme to its own section, since that is what Norman is primarily known for. Primogen (talk) 16:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Bond Theme section 

message: Norman appeared on the Series 40: 6. Entertainment Special of Antiques Roadshow on 31 December 2017, with his original handwritten manuscript for the Bond theme:  Martinevans123 (talk) 20:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Antiques Roadshow]]'' 
Talk:Endothelial microparticle

message: This article consists for 50% of references, mostly of work by the same research group. I'm concerned that it's trying to describe a phenomenon that is not yet well-defined and is still in a state of flux. I would much rather quote one or two well-organised review articles than a whole whack of studies that are only meaningful to those already deep into vascular research. JFW | T@lk 15:39, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I've added a couple of relevant reviews and taken out the mess of other stuff. Sorry I don't have for more right now Cloning jedi (talk) 16:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Kryha

message: How do you pronouce "Kryha"? Melchoir 23:57, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it is just as written: [kriːhɑ]. English man probably be inclined to say [kɹaɪhæ]?--178.158.194.61 (talk) 08:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation?
Talk:The Scarlet Letter

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Scarlet Letterman. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 15#Scarlet Letterman until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 03:49, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Scarlet Letterman" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Reception needs work. It should reflect more modern day analysis as it is claimed to be a masterwork yet nearly half of the critics cited are negative. 2603:6010:11F0:3C0:71CC:AE7A:CEEB:4053 (talk) 03:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: The "Adaptions and influences" section has been tagged as needing expansion. I looked at the main article. It's basically a lengthy list of references to it in mainly television. I honestly know of no other suitable way it could be summarized in the "Adaptions and influences" sections, so I think the tag should be removed. Should I go ahead — Python Drink (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we remove this tag? 

message: I think that the 2010 film adaptation Easy A starring Emma Stone ought to be included in the Films section. -cspan02 (talk) 08:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Easy A in the Films section
Talk:P53

message: Turn it into something meaningful and interesting like the functions of TP53 and it's role in cancer please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:383:3E40:84AE:C085:BE76:C42E (talk) 16:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 1st and most important sentence should not be wasted on all the confusing synonyms 

message: The repetitions must be removed, and the content arranged in a meaningful manner to make it easier for the readers to understand.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by User8647 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Regulation section contains unnecessary repetitions 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nata11ashatan (talk) 02:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry II

message: Introduction section: In addition to the full-length protein, the human TP53 gene encodes at least 15 protein isoforms.
Isoforms section: Several isoforms were discovered in 2005, and so far 12 human p53 isoforms have been identified (p53α, p53β, p53γ, ∆40p53α, ∆40p53β, ∆40p53γ, ∆133p53α, ∆133p53β, ∆133p53γ, ∆160p53α, ∆160p53β, ∆160p53γ).
Which number (15 or 12) is valid? Agentjoerg (talk) 04:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The answer is 12. FullyNatural (talk) 16:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many isoforms?
Talk:Constant capital

message: I don't understand Jim's preference for c/v over c:v. As I understand it from Ratio, "Ratios are not exactly the same thing as fractions. For example, if I have three pennies and five nickels, then the ratio of pennies to nickels is 3:5 or 3/5. This indicates that there are three fifths as many pennies as nickels. However the fraction of coins which are pennies is 3/(3+5) = 3/8. Thus the chances of a randomly selected coin being a penny are three in eight." So I'd prefer c:v. But I'm no great mathematician. Adhib 16:58, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This § was an especial mess and the counterargument I supplied could be considered OR but it should be possible to source it independent from my observation. 72.228.150.44 (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: There needs to be a tie-in to variable capital somewhere with regards to the "human capital" and "knowledge capital" concepts. Kjk2.1 (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Human capital," "knowledge capital" tie-ins 

message: Is it just me or does this article look like it's gone beyond it's scope?  Commodity fetishism?  Even some of the discussion of theories of value probably doesn't belong here.  BrianPansky (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some content looks like it's off topic
Talk:Jack Harris (Newfoundland and Labrador politician)

message: I will never be convinced that Jack Harris is any less important a human being than Napoleon Bonaparte.  Granted, Bonaparte is a more common topic of conversation throughout the world, but is there any reason why both should not be listed within an encyclopedia whose contents are as broad as the internet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.227.79.50 (talk) 17:09, 15 December 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikiproject Canada assigns importance rankings by the role that a politician holds within Canadian politics, not by subjective assessments of how much we like the person. Harris is a federal MP and a former provincial MHA, and has never been a premier, prime minister or cabinet minister. Ranking him "low" is not a comment on his value as a person — it just means he's never held certain specific roles. Whether you like Napoleon or not, it's undeniable that he's an essential topic within any proper understanding of French history. But Jack Harris, nice guy though he is, isn't an essential topic within Canadian history or politics. Bearcat (talk) 03:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why not create a disambiguation page for Jack Harris and maintain the history of article structure for Jack Harris (Canadian politician) instead of the way it was done by User:Jaxon1 which has only succeeded in confusing the discussion page for Jack Harris politician and served only to set precedence of individuals by nationality. --HJKeats (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rename
Talk:John Byrne (comics)/Archive 1

message: Don't forget to mention that in John's later days he's taken to the use of more culturally insulting language, something he delights in doing on his own forum, which sees overflow to other areas. by User:68.161.200.3 
:(sign your edits, enter new comments at bottom or with astericks *) <>Who?¿? 21:37, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial Discussion

message: I propose you use a Temp page to do the edits, therefore you can reach a consensus of how you want the article to look.  <>Who?¿? 18:16, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Temp page

message: The article currently states that he was born "near West Bromwich". Would it be better to be more specific and name the town, Walsall? Sources can be found using a Google search, in particular this page:  --Nick R 21:11, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: Does anyone know where the story that "Days of Future Past" was altered by Claremont comes from? This one I have never heard of until this article. RodOdom 01:49, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Search JB's message board, if you can.  Basically, Byrne pretty much wrote the whole plot.  Byrne intended the story to have an very upbeat ending--they succeded in stoping a bad future from coming about, for the first time in a while The X-Men have a true success.  But if you read Claremont's dialog, it becomes a real downbeat ending, ruining the ultimate result Byrne wanted.
That sounds very plausible. I would prefer it if you can show me the post where JB says this, because I'm a frequent reader of that site and have never seen this. RodOdom 02:33, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: X-Men

message: Just found this interview whilst trying to find correct name of imprint as my memory has gone, and Mignola says he was responsible for bringing Byrne into the imprint, which seems to run against what is up on the temp page. Hiding 22:22, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend Imprint 

message: Protected far too long.  Time to move on. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 01:09, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved Temp changes to the main page.  Have at it, all.  Let's just be sure to label our changes and then discuss any disputes.  --JRT 01:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotected
Talk:War of Devolution

message: Dans un document familial datant de 1854, un de mes aïeux fait état de ce que son arrière-arrière grand-père est venu s'établir à St Léger ( dans le Tournaisis, ouest de l'actuelle province du Hainaut ) " à l'occasion des guerres de Louis XIV "...
Cela me permet d'estimer que le souvenir de la guerre de Dévolution était encore assez vivace dans cette région du pays à presque deux siècles de distance.
Il serait intéressant de savoir si des mouvements de population étaient d'usage courant dans les territoires conquis. Le village de St Léger n'est pas resté en possession de la France, au contraire de ce qui est dénommé actuellement la "Flandre Française" = (Lille, Dunkerke, Amiens..)
:Generally there wasn't much planned colonising. It should be remembered that the notion, such as it existed, of a French people, had then very little to do with what language was spoken. Of course individuals took advantage of opportunities offered. In war people die and were replaced by others. At the time there was a lot of individual migration in Europe. Of course your ancestor might have been a highranking French official, sent to gouvern :o). --MWAK 09:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How was Sweden involved in this war? Did they participate in any fighting?Imonoz (talk) 21:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish war 

message: The French did not win this war. Most of the French conquests were returned to the Spanish. It should be considered a draw, or indecisive. King Philip V of Spain (talk) 09:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A French victory? 

message: In view of the slow-burning edit war that has been going on for several months, I have taken the unusual measure of upgrading the existing semi-protection to full. The semi-protection, which put a stop to the series of edits from IPs in the Toulon area, caused a named account to pick up the torch. I was strongly tempted to use the clue stick, but decided on this method instead. Both parties will now have to contribute to the discussion initiated above. Failure to do so followed by renewed edit-warring, once the protection expires or is lifted, will likely lead to a long block. Favonian (talk) 11:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article fully protected
Talk:Acholiland

message: I figured that I might as well use the LRA map I made to generate another one for Acholiland. Suggestions or comments are welcome, it's easy to adjust the map!  — mark ✎ 17:28, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: map

message: acholiland is one of the places i'm currently doing research on.
along with djibouti.
Gringo300 05:59, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope we get to see the results in the form of improvements to the article! — mark ✎ 11:19, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: research
Talk:Truffle

message: The French would be outraged. :p 67.160.10.87 04:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, we are pretty pissed. 2600:1700:2F60:E2B0:3858:AAC2:A502:694E (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  no pictures of black truffles? 

message: Truffles are known for being expensive, but how expensive are they? I had to follow a link to an external website (via the references) to find out. Shouldn't this information be in the article? I note that prices are given for both saffron and caviar... 62.64.210.6 (talk) 00:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes, but how much do they ''cost''? 

message: "Similar appearance to" is a very odd and clunky phrase to these American ears, but I have zero desire to edit war over it. Signed, freelance writer. IAmNitpicking (talk) 11:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound of language 

message: The italian name for the white truffle is "tartufo bianco" or sometimes "tartufo bianco d'Alba". The name "trifola" is from the piedmontese dialect, where Alba is located. "Trifola d'Alba" is quite a regional denomination: most of italians will not necessarily understand what are you talking about! Anyway the suffix "Madonna", and as such the apparent translation of the group "Alba Madonna" as "white Madonna" is absolutely invalid. OK that the latin "albus" means "bianco", white in italian, but the name "Alba" is the name of a city that nothing has to do with the name of the color or of the virgin Mary whatsoever!
I can see that the suffix "Madonna" was added by some unnamed user, IP=172.12.90.215, some 8 years ago, on 2014-12-15T04:13:18. And that name has been fixed since then to all the new revisions and copied to the main article on Tuber magnatum. Many other references on the web use that name, but they are all in english. I can find only few references in italian to the suffix "Madonna", all evidently derived from automatic translations from english. I live in northern Italy and regularly visit Alba for the truffle fair.
I believe this was a bad joke, and if there are no other ideas I will correct the name, omitting the "Madonna" suffix, and using the italian name "tartufo" instead of the dialectal "trifola". This last name can be left as a curiosity. I will do the same on the Tuber magnatum page. Pietro Toniolo (talk) 12:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trifola d'Alba... Madonna?
Wikipedia talk:Welcome unregistered editing

message: Can someone with more experience than I in editing WP pages explaining guidelines and policies please add the usual header explaining that this is an informal guideline rather than official policy?  (Provided, that is, that it has the status of a guideline.)  TIA ---CH 23:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify

message: User's Box		
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: #ecffee;"		This user is too lazy to register.
For those who are interested. Feel free to tweak or modify. 198.20.40.50 17:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cute, but remember that we can't use the Wikipedia logo freely like that.  It's under copyright and subject to the Wikimedia visual identity guidelines.  Powers 18:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then I suggest you do something about . 68.39.174.238 04:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Thanks!  Powers T 20:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymity Tag 

message: Is there a formal policy about Anon Editing?  
Are Anon Editors formally prohibited from participating in "back-of-house" issues, such as RfC's, ANI's, or any other internal political discussions?
Please advise.  Thanks! 207.237.230.164 (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, no such formal restrictions.  Just a certain, highly variable, amount of informal disparagement!  84.203.42.145 (talk) 16:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Policy?
Talk:Adrenaline junkie

message: Hi there, folks. I did a bunch of work on this; the language ("some guy on one of those Believe-it-or-not shows"?!) and formatting looked like it could use some cleaning up. I also added some supplemental information about addiction and neurochemistry.
This is my first Wikipedia edit besides minor spelling and punctuation revisions here and there; please be gentle with me but brutal with revisions. I want a second pair of eyes to proofread. I'm especially looking for people to help me with stylistic issues like peacock and weasel terms.
(by the way, I didn't think about creating a username before I wrote the article, so my edition is only identified by my IP addy, but I really did write it! ^_^)
Um, how come I can get the damn 'contents' box to activate? Its driving me nuts! Makes me want to go join an army ;) 83.71.104.139 22:31, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  did some stuff 

message: Is horseback riding really 'extreme'? From what i've seen, it's mostly an elegant sport, not usually associated with high adreneline levels. The clarifiying comment '(more advanced levels that include jumping the horse over obstacles)' seems to support this. Additionally riding on top of a horse is mentioned twice; what about bull riding?  Fillup 00:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor query 

message: "The term came into use in 1993...The phrase adrenaline junkie was used in the 1991 movie Point Break to describe the "Ex-Presidents."
How can it have been used in a 1991 movie if the term originated in 1993? [Note: The date is approximate; the term was used in the early days of an AOL chat group, 1990 at the earliest - so the movie may have been the first instance] Can someone please either make the phrase "came into use" clearer, if it's referring to a certain usage that started in 1993 or correct whichever statement is erroneous?
If it's still like that in a day or two, I'll remove the part about it being first used in 1993  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenifh (talk • contribs) 20:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeming contradiction

message: Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor for words that "someone created in school one day." And that latter part includes catchwords that aren't used that often that refer to everyday things like this that have no importance. No citations, and no, linking to Jack Osbourne's TV show doesn't qualify. - Cyborg Ninja (talk) 05:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should be deleted 

message: I redirected this article to a section I made entitled "Adrenaline Junkie" on the epinephrine page. Sincerally and truly yours, C6541 (talk) 11:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect