Talk:Mr. Stain

message: I have written a sketch of the other characters and added a few u missed out
also the official site link has been updated(the previous one was dead)
i'll be adding an info box and other citations
Binarymoron (talk) 17:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New info Added 

message: there seems to be no info on the Kimono girl anywhere!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Binarymoron (talk • contribs) 10:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No info on Kimono Beauty 

message: The characters section is in the process of expansion and the Producion section will be added soon(just as soon as I get any material related to it).Binarymoron (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters And Production 

message: Mostly on prose issues. Here's a sample...
*Please format the refs in a consistent manner, eg using 
:Binarymoron (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the comment means that they all need the same information in a consistent manner - for internet refs please make sure they all give title, publisher and date retrieved, plus author if known. For example Current Ref 31 only has the title (About Ryuji Masuda) and does not give the publisher or date accessed, or on the review's I would give the reviewer's name as author (assume you are using ). I fixed ref 2 to switch to the actual title and moe the publisher into the publisher = field, so it now reads " "Ga-Ra-Ku-Ta: Mr. Stain on Junk Alley (TV)". Anime News Network. Retrieved on December 30, 2007." Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 17:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:   Binarymoron (talk) 12:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Binarymoron (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Her name is Beautiful Lifa, in character listing after the fourteenth episode her name is mentioned as Beautiful Lifa. Binarymoron (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Binarymoron (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

text: changed wordings to "can also be seen", could you elaborate on how it is unclear? Binarymoron (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry about the ref, you've answered that with the ref 10 note below. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 00:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Binarymoron (talk) 12:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Binarymoron (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

text: the site is a flash module and on the flash module character section has to be clicked no separate url can be provided for the section since it is embedded into the main page Binarymoron (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, that's fine then. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 00:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Binarymoron (talk) 12:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

text: sourced to reviewer Binarymoron (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Binarymoron (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fair use overuse and adds very little to the article. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 00:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Binarymoron (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Binarymoron (talk) 14:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Binarymoron (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  *shrug* up to you. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 00:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:   Binarymoron (talk) 16:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm not going to pass this as a GA or re-review, but if you want to renominate, I won't stop you, though I encourage the next reviewer to look at the stuff not done here. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 00:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA

message: GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
#Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
AnmaFinotera (talk) 19:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: Having viewed the disc I note that the episodes are not presented in anamorphic but in 4:3 letterbox.. This may be due to an error on FUNimation's part, but it means both the original text of this article and the review on which it was based are wrong. Lee M (talk) 20:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video quality 

message: Hi Wikipedia editors, i have a genuine question regarding this anime: Is its fifteen episode "Creator" canonical enough to be considered in the episode list? 186.78.138.254 (talk) 02:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifteen episode