lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Automatic (Pointer Sisters song)

message: I think the songwriter(s) should have their own section and explain who they are. While these performers are hot hot hot, what is it about these lyrics at this time that helped to make the song so different? It mattered.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.199.196.39 (talk) 12:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songwriter? 

message: I should think if it is that significant it should get its own page, rather than taking over nearly half the content of this one. 50.166.4.111 (talk) 18:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why so much prominence to Ultra Naté cover? 
Talk:Cosmetic surgery

message: To place redirect template  on Cosmetic surgery.
(Note: Talk:Cosmetic surgery is also fully protected).
-- OlEnglish (Talk) 10:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: , and this talk page unprotected. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  editprotected request 

message: Cosmetic Surgery should not redirect to Plastic Surgery as it is non synonymous.  The case has been made several times on the Plastic Surgery article.  It is important to give the Cosmetic Surgery article a chance to develop on it's own.  Plastic Surgery is a board specialty of surgeons.  Cosmetic Surgery is a collection of surgical procedures undertaken to improve cosmesis.  These are not one in the same.  Please allow Cosmetic Surgery article to flourish.
ArizonaFace (talk) 06:35, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has never faced a deletion discussion, so I would be able to create an article for you. The problems it has faced in the past are copyright violations and spam, so it would need watching carefully. Would you mind writing a draft article in your userspace, (e.g. at User:ArizonaFace/Cosmetic surgery) and when it is ready I can move it over for you. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from ArizonaFace, 5 May 2011 

message: Please remove the permanent full protection from this page. This page currently redirects to plastic surgery, but this topic could (and should) be its own article just as reconstructive surgery is, but the permanent full protection blocks anyone except admins from coming along and creating this article. It looks like the full protection was put on back in 2008 due to copyright violations. Having full protection on a viable article topic for over a decade seems very excessive to me, and not in accordance with the spirit of Wikipedia:Protection policy which states in the first sentence that: "Wikipedia is built around/with the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors." Dropping the protection level down to something like permanent semi-protection or extended confirmed protection would be much more appropriate and would allow an article on this topic to be created. Rreagan007 (talk) 16:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: to request and discuss unprotection please post at WP:RFPP. — xaosflux Talk 17:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 22 August 2019
Talk:Convention Army

message: — Assignment last updated by Stuartlech (talk) 23:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENG 102 Summer 2022
Talk:Fenerbahçe Ülker

message: I think most of the players in the notable players section is unneccesary as most of them played just one season and achieved nothing with the team. For example bernard king and sylvester gray are not one of the players that fans could remember. However, henry turner, dallas comegys, kaspars kambala, mitch smith are the players that gets interest and be succesful in our team.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scragnothh (talk • contribs) 20:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Players 

message: Fenerbahçe had an sponsor deal with Ülker group, not with Ülkerspor. Fenerbahçe S.K. was founded in 1907, long long before Ülkerspor. Fenerbahçe and Ülkerspor played against each other for years. It is useless to have the history nor honours of Ülkerspor in this page. Those interested may take a look at Ülkerspor page.
Alpella is successor of Ülkerspor...
*https://www.tblstat.net/team/2
And the name of the team is not "Fenerbahçe Ülkerspor". No more Ülkerspor left, it is "Fenerbahçe Ülker". 
Alex20fb (talk) 01:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fenerbahçe is not successor of Ülkerspor 
Talk:List of avant-garde films before 1930

message: ... and at this point it is close to complete. While there are many more citations to add, I have added at least one citation for every film listed. I humbly suggest that the "Lacking citations" and "incomplete" tags can now be removed.Pinikadia 21:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Have Been Working on this Page
Talk:List of avant-garde films of the 1930s

message: This article could use a redesign.  Right now it's hard to use or edit.  Morganfitzp (talk) 21:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 

message: Per WP:RS/IMDb, we don't use IMDb as a reliable source. I know a lot of work was put into this, but we'll have to find replacements or remove the IMDb sources. Some of the other sources are not specific either. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: IMDb

message: The current source for this film is not strong enough. The user who re-added it has stated that "This film was a lot more experimental in style before it was recut by its producers.". Whether that's true or not, the finished product as the film was released does not belong here until a better source is found. Avant-garde and experimental films are not just films with abstract imagery. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:44, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: End of the World
Talk:Ao Guang

message: First sentence - I would never have guessed that the dragon king of the east sea was the dragon king of the east sea...--173.3.24.254 (talk) 02:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like the article was once moved from the name "Ao Guang" to the title "Dragon King of the East Sea" and that was left unnoticed. Maybe, it should be moved back, along with the other Dragon Kings... but too unfamiliar with the topic. (Nevermind, just noticed the dragons have several names) I'll just reword it.  Cold Season (talk) 03:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead

message: Just for quick reference: Chinese wiki redirects Ao Guang to Azure Dragon.--Shanghainese.ua (talk) 08:30, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azure Dragon 
Talk:List of avant-garde films of the 2000s

message: The film was released along with the Raro Video DVD, which was released January 11, 2005, as noted in the Raro video catalog entry referenced. Public screenings did not commence until later, around the time of the Genesis P-Orridge interview also sourced, in 2011. The film was shot in Paris and New York, with perhaps some sequences in London, between 1963-1972, but not put into this form, with this soundtrack, until the Raro video. The final production work was done in New York City in the 2000s. It is obviously avant-garde and experimental; you can see it on the web if there's any doubt.Pinikadia
:Hi Pinikadia, I don't really disagree that's it's experimental or avant-garde or any other thing like that, but we still need a source because genre is subjective. All the other items are sourced and people have added things here that do not belong in the past from Coen Brothers films because they felt they were experimental. We just need sources to back this stuff up. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost at No. 9 
Talk:Juvéderm

message: The citations noted for this preparation have lost their link on the FDA website. There are now no longer any supporting citations for this product on the Wikipedia page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.231.41.60 (talk) 23:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Even Juvéderm's own commercials (UK English: adverts) mention side effects that are not discussed in this article. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 16:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side effects 

message: Hello, I'm new here. I just noticed that the first reference on the reference list is not a real one!!
                           Monheit, Gary D and Coleman, Kyle M; Dermatologic Therapy 19 (3), 141-150; May 2006.
THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT HAVE AN ARTICLE NAME!!
Authors:Monheit, Gary D and Coleman, Kyle M
Title:???
Journal and edition:Dermatologic Therapy 19 (3)
Pages:141-150
Date:May 2006.
I deleted it, and the other false (or maybe just incorrect) reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.96.93.32 (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: False references
Talk:Artefill

message: This article reads like it was written by a sales/PR  person from artefill. 
* no sources except official fda article.
* No internal wiki links.
* No pointers to alternatives.
* The "side effect" described in the article are less critical than in the official http://www.artefill.com/pdf_download/IFU_artefill2.pdf instuctions for use.  
:13:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sales catalog 

message: the microspheres are plastic and have no available blood supply to deliver antibiotics to the area should a bacterial infection develop around the material. the body walls-off the area, causing inflamation and lumps. the only way to resolve this is surgical removal of the material. good injection practice requires the material is evenly distributed, not into 'lakes',and in the deep dermal plane. surgeons advise injection into different planes of dermis, and use of especially small amounts of the material to minimize potential problems.107.196.30.155 (talk) 06:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  artefill problem 

message: The following statement is both irrelevant and inaccurate:
Medical grade PMMA has been used for decades (50+ years) in a variety of medical applications including intraocular lenses to treat cataracts, artificial joints, etc.
* Irrelevant: The Artefill is injected into the skin, and the PMMA material ends up in direct contact with cellular component of human tissue. This is not the case for the two PMMA examples given. In the eye as well as in the bone and around joints, most of the PMMA surfaces are covered by extracellular material (aqueous humor or calcium-collagen matrix) and has significantly less contact with cellular component of tissue. One cannot assume safety of the material purely based on the fact that it had been implanted in other compartments of the body.
For an example of this type of fallacy, consider the following statements:
1. Many people have eaten a hamburger, which ended up in the stomach, and did not die.
2. Hamburger in the stomach is safe.
3. Therefore, a hamburger elsewhere in the body is safe, too.
Statements 1 and 2 are factual. Statement 3 is not. This is because Statement 3 relies on the implicit assumption that all body compartments are equal, which is the problem with the statement under scrutiny. It is a bad scientific mind that assumes, if substance A is safe in the eye or in the joint, it must be safe for skin.
*Inaccurate: PMMA had been used in the past for IOL and artificial joints, is no longer used widely. It has been replaced by other materials with superior optical and biomechanical properties.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tofoo (talk • contribs) 05:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  PMMA statement
Talk:Lip plate

message: Maybe we should mention the "Black Panther" movie somewhere?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.116.101 (talk) 23:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

message: Are a labret on 25cm (10") reasonable probable? I have a danish tekst which tell about a Lip plate on 50cm in diameter. 
I think as "diameter" and "circumference" are confused. As 25cm = 8cm and 50cm = 16cm. If the mouth is 5cm, a disc on 8cm is practicable, and disc about 15-16cm in diameter is a world record for Lip plates.Haabet 11:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: '''25cm?'''

message: The source that is listed, is a reference to 'labrets', which includes lip rings, and piercings, not just 'plates'.
I think it's misleading because those of Iran and the Balkans never used lip plates.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.196.88.228 (talk) 03:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Lip plate, confused with Labret''=
Category talk:Body modification

message: I have added several subjects to this category with the basis of Jon Cobb's comments when asked "What is Body Modification?":In the not so immediately apparent, a lot of possibilities aren't regarded for what they are: Bodybuilding, yoga's physical aspects and contortion, pilates (a type of exercise that leads to full realization of the elastic potential of the body; you can literally grow an inch or more through loosening up the connective tissues between bones, etc.), martial arts hand conditioning, cosmetic surgery or dentistry, hair removal or adorning or patterning (tribalized chest or forearm shaving patterns can only be so out there to somebody), anorexic, bulimic, or fasting behavior intended not to appease the mind but result in a bodily appearance that better reflects the self image, name it; my wife just suggested class=Category (if clothing is worn continually with the primary purpose of adornment and encasement, or possibly negation, it ceases to be both temporary, surface, and necessary, therefore a real modification). We no more "need" to comb or keep our hair, or wear clothes inside our houses, than we need to pierce ourselves, but we do, so we should recognize this gift for what it is. In short, any conscientious deviation from the base form of the nude body
Team4Technologies (talk) 11:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cobb
Talk:Jin dynasty

message: Pinyin Romanization needs to have tone marks added because they represent a fundamental part of the pronunciation of the words (the whole purpose of Romanization, after all); nowhere is this MORE VITAL than when you have Chinese words which are identical except for their tones, such as the two main Jin dynasties and the two 'later' versions. Even if you are opposed to the 'clutter' of tone marks, please do not remove them in cases such as this where the marks are actually an important part of the disambiguation. (If a student of Chinese history hears 'jin1' (1st tone) and goes to search for this dynasty on Wiki, that tone is the ONLY thing which helps him or her select between the two main Jin dynasties listed.)Dragonbones (talk) 04:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Botan Rice Candy

message: breaking npov --69.232.215.153 (talk) 02:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I have expanded the article and added more sources, so I have removed the tags that were at the top of the article because I think I have resolved these issues. Feel free to add them back on if you disagree. Shugurim (talk) 22:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  RM
Talk:ARA Veinticinco de Mayo (C-2)

message: Hi all, 
Reviewing articles on argentinian cruisers, I've noticed that for the ships of this class ("Veinticinco de Mayo" cruisers) there is still room for improvement. So I'll try to find out some additional sources (printed and/or online) and will try to expand a bit both articles and make them consistent. 
Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 07:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency and expansion 

message: After revisiting the assessment checklist I believe that this article can qualify as Start (albeit a "light" one!), so will upgrade it from Stub. Regards, DPdH (talk) 05:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Article now qualifies as "start" as per guidelines from related wikiprojects, reclassified as such. Regards, DPdH (talk) 20:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality re-assessment 

message: This article repeats some erroneous information I have seen elsewhere on the web, to the effect that this was one of only three cruiser classes with 7.5" guns.  
In fact there were many more: the British built four classes of armored cruisers with 7.5" guns (Warrior, Minotaur, Achilles and Devonshire classes), plus the Hawkins class after WWI; the Italians built two classes of armored cruisers (Pisa and San Giorgio) and an armored cruiser for the Greeks (Averoff), all of which used the same British design 7.5 inch guns.  Also the Austrians used the 19 cm guns (7.48") that were so close as to be no different, and the French used the very similar 19.4 cm guns (7.64") in many cruiser classes.  The British also built a pair of ships some call armored cruisers and others call battleships (Triumph and Swiftsure), then bought them from their intended purchasers.  
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/index_weapons.htm
It would be correct, and on the intended point, to say this was the only class of Treaty cruisers using the 7.5" gun.  The Hawkins were before the Washington Treaty, although kept and used under it and a possible cause for the Treaty cruiser gun limits.  The others were all built before the First World War.
69.14.164.247 (talk) 06:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous information
Talk:Jillian Becker

message: This article reads as if it were written by the Jillian Becker fan club.  How about a bit of objectivity?  109.148.210.43 (talk) 15:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: the article was clearly started and coined by someone who has a close connection to the article's subject.––Severino (talk) 10:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the most prolific editor here is Becker herself]] (see the above connected contributor template). I've tried to trim the article, but I'm not the best at this. Graham87 07:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started a discussion at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Graham87 10:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

text: I have one question and one question only: what is your relationship with Jillian Becker? Wikipedia articles are based on what reliable sources say about a person, not on what they write about themselves and the others around them. Graham87 00:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert
Talk:Gunshot

message: If you have had a gun shot wound and the bullet was soft lead. Will it cause blood poisoning. Have had this in my body for 34 yrs and now i am not makeing any red blood cells. Do you think that would have something to do with it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.126.32 (talk) 16:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gun shot wounds 

message: This link does not work on safari for me 202.179.130.41 (talk) 23:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Man-portable
Talk:Lord of Vermilion

message: I AM IN JAPANS AND THIS PAGE IS VERY VERY UN-UPDATED.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.18.178.133 (talk) 12:30, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So why don't you, oh I dunno, update it for the people who don't have access nor can understand the game? 65.94.13.87 (talk) 19:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Operation Underworld

message: "Luciano was in Dannemora at the time, serving a 30 to 50 year sentence for running a prostitution ring. For his cooperation he was moved to a more convenient and comfortable open prison in Great Meadows in May 1942."
According to the Wikipedia page on the Great Meadows Correctional Facility, a wall surrounding the prison was completed in 1928, at which point Great Meadows became a "maximum security prison."  I see nothing to indicate that the facility was either "comfortable" or "open."
Also, according to Google Maps, the Dannemora facility is located approximately 314 miles from New York City, while Great Meadows is located approximately 215 miles from NYC.  So while Great Meadows may indeed have been 100 miles closer to the seat of Mafia power, it was still over 200 miles away, and therefore not convenient at all, given the fact that 1942 was more than a decade prior to the first beginnings of the US interstate highway system, and that May 1942 saw the beginning of gasoline rationing in the US, and a national speed limit of 35 miles per hour was imposed to save fuel and rubber for the war effort. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationing) Arcanicus (talk) 05:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Meadow Prison
Category talk:Taiwanese cuisine

message: It's pretty unusual for a category page to include an image gallery. Would it be sufficient to leave the commons category link and remove this gallery? Ibadibam (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: removed in April 2020--Estopedist1 (talk) 09:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Image gallery
Talk:Li Dian

message: In Dynasty Warriors, it says his death was in 209??? That's not possible, please help. Kamek98 (talk) 02:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dynasty Warriors
Talk:Sam Claphan

message: I am moving this article to Sam Claphan since both first and last names should be capitalized. Truthanado (talk) 03:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name capitalization
Talk:Wen Ping

message: Are people 100% sure Wen Ping and Yue Jin's attacks where against Guan Yu at the same time as the battle of Jiangling rather then raids during Guan Yu's time in Jing? DongZhuo3kingdoms (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 17:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wen Ping against Guan Yu
Talk:Xiahou Ba

message: When I expand the article (as of March 09, 2011), my primary source is the Brief History of Wei, and secondary sources being biographies of Guo Huai, Xiahou Xuan, and Xiahou Yuan from SGZ. I glanced though material from the biography of Jiang Wei and Liu Shan, and believe quotes can be made from it to implement Xiahou's later life as a Shu general, as I need to focus on something else and won't be available for a week, I leave this note here so people may have a direction on where to look at for citations.----EkmanLi (talk) 06:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:The Juice of the Barley

message: Yes the text of this article appears to be copied from all these other websites...they're lyrics from a traditional song.  Doesn't that put it in the public domain?  Is this really Copyright infringement?  --Gueneverey (talk) 03:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: "bainne na mbó is an gamhna" should perhaps be "bainne na mbó dos na gamhna" Irish Gaelic Translator
41.13.246.150 (talk) 09:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think the last paragraph is worded in a way that doesn't sound professional. I think it's also an exaggeration to claim "most people. Although most people in Ireland are not fluent in Irish, most people know way more than "a word" JayBirdtyper (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: there are no citations as of typing this comment JayBirdtyper (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references
Talk:Lord T & Eloise

message: This group seems to have notability; I can dig up the sources mentioned in the article, but I don't have the expertise to rewrite the article to wikipedia standards (other than removing assertions of being born with pure gold skin). Any takers? Flowanda | Talk 02:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started making it more wikipedia-like in nature, but some of the text probably still needs some cleanup. Read other band's pages, emulate those styles. -- Otto 20:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and tone 
Talk:DARPA XG

message: * Two years old
* no progress since
* Info good enough
* No need take an entry in the list of clean-up  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilane (talk • contribs) 00:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up Tag suppressed 
Talk:Matheson (automobile)

message: Some confusion may arise as to the start date of this company, as Holyoke pre-dated Matheson. --Rupertlt (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: The Legacy section gives no dates or references - words like "recently" are unhelpful, dates are better - Has this project happened? What about a photograph? --Rupertlt (talk) 13:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy