Talk:Digital radiography

message: Hello, to all person who keeps removing the link from Digital Radiography. It was and is not SPAM!
The original WIKI page mentioned and still has Video Dental Concepts as the first company to introduce Dental Sensors to North American in 1992. I am the webmaster and content writer for Video Dental's website. They indeed were the first according to WIKI article and owners of Video Dental Concept for introducing dental sensors in 1992 and intraoral cameras in 1989 to North American. Can you please leave the link up. 
Thanks and have a great day.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_radiography#Historical_milestones_for_digital_intraoral_sensors  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brettgallop (talk • contribs) 16:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: We shouldn't include external links like that in the body of the article, see WP:EL. I don't see anybody disputing that they were first (and the mention is still there), it is just the external link that is against guidelines. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 00:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

text: I do not see another external link below where you are spamming your site. If I am just missing it, please tell me the URL that you are talking about, so I can CTRL+F it. FFS, trying to uphold WP guideline is not "cyber bullying". However, trying to add a link in which you are affiliated with is a conflict of interest, and if your only goal here is to include your company's link, then it is spam. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 19:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

text: The Sirona link is not an external link. It is a link to the Wikipedia article on them. That is an internal link and is perfectly acceptable. Internal links are appropriate, external are not. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 19:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Dental link

message: I am wondering just how accurate and objective are the "time line" sections???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:2002:2F8:A2BE:7487:F209:11BB:C294 (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it definitely needs more sourcing and expanding, and probably a lot of the company mentions removing. I was planning to do it at some point soon when I have more time, but if anyone can jump in it would be great! Beevil (talk) 16:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page sounds like an ad for various companies.  

message: This technology adding dynamic visualization of anatomy in motion, acquiring ~15 sequential radiographs per second and playing them back as video loop, to digital radiography is interesting.  Konica Minolta webpage
Reportedly is low-dose X-ray imaging and US FDA approved.  Allows observation of "the physiological cycle and as individual radiographic images.  Of course this source would not be a good source since it is from a manufacturer.  I have no conflict of interest; just noting a medical technique that was new to me today and is not covered in the Digital radiography Wikipedia article.
If this process is being used, and can be supported from the open medical literature and FDA public documents as a medical technique, then the article should be improved by discussing this DDR technology and its uses in human healthcare. — N2e (talk) 10:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynamic digital radiography 

message: — Assignment last updated by ImagingMatters (talk) 23:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cardiopulmonary and Diagnostic Applications 1