lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Satya

message: Copyright on this highly personal essay, unlike other edits from this anon. IP? --Wetman 14:13, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe that this and other articles dealing with the five Mahavratas of Jainism should be high importance because they are the fundamental tenets of the religion. I'll change their importances to high for WikiProject Jainism, and if any objects, he/she can change them back. --Qmwne235 20:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of [[Mahavarata]]s? 

message: This article constantly implies that for Hindus, Buddhists and Jains, Satya or the truth is equated with God. This is fundamentally inaccurate and clearly a case of personal interpretation by the author. The Buddha never commented on God, let alone equate the concept of the Ultimate Truth being the same as Almighty God. There are many different interpretations as to what constitutes the Ultimate Truth, and only some of them suggest that the Ultimate Truth is the same as God. Sadly, I cannot cite any sources for this information. However, even in terms of simple linguistic translation, Satya does _not_ translate to 'God'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkseidX (talk • contribs) 19:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gross inaccuracy in translating 'sate hitam satyam' and other deviations 

message: Stop breaking WP:INDICSCRIPTS. This is the English wikipedia and it is completely unnecessary to add devanagari to these articles because if you can't read it, it's gibberish, and if you can read it, you already know the Sanskrit because we provide the romanisation. Ogress smash! 09:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Have placed the Devanagari in the etymology section. I think is reasonable. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 17:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly that section is original research. Ogress smash! 19:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devanagari 

message: English 112.79.63.231 (talk) 02:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satya
Talk:Young's inequality

message: What's with this application of Jensen inequality? That is just a generalization of concavity from sums to integrals. Since here we only use a 2term sum exactly as per the definition of concavity, there is absolutely no need to include Jensen in the proof. MarSch 14:21, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; I was very hasty.  Although it is indeed a special case of J's inequality, it's a vacuous one. Michael Hardy 23:08, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Jensen

message: Why not prove it with AM-GM as hinted to in the introduction "Young's inequality is a special case of the inequality of weighted arithmetic and geometric means. "?  Just set x_1=a^p, x_2=a^q, w_1=1/p and w_2=1/q and apply weighted AM-GM, that's it. (w_1 x_1+w_2 x_2 =a^p/p+b^q/q\geq x_1^{w_1} x_2^{w_2}=a b. How the proof can be done with exp/log can be inferred from the proofs on AM-GM is the respective article. 134.169.77.186 12:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current proof is quite self-contained and discusses also the case of equality. Of course, it's just (strict) convexity in different disguises. Furthermore, the more general formulation from the German page should be included (which has an easy proof). Maybe I (or someone else) does this eventually and thereby rewrites the current proof anyway. Schmock 19:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpler proof 

message: In the section "Generalization using Legendre transforms" of the article, there is a nice graphical proof of the generalized version of Young's inequality (i note, that PlanethMath calls Young's inequality just this generalized version). I have two questions about it.
1. Could somebody show a book reference for this version of Young' inequality and for this graphical proof?
2. It isn't quite clear for me that why is this just in the section "Generalization using Legendre transforms". What is here to do with Legendre transform?
Thanks in advance!
89.135.29.171 (talk) 06:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: To the second question: Write the stated inequality as g(b)≥ab-f(a) and note that the Legendre transform g(b) is in fact defined to be the maximum value of ab−f(a). Hanche (talk) 21:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof by picture in section "Generalization using Legendre transforms" 

message: The generalization to inner products that was recently added works also for the general case. But more to the point, it is an immediate corollary of the scalar case and the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. Hence I think it adds little value, and should be removed. Hanche (talk) 16:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inner product version 

message: I think that the convolution inequality is a quite different inequality: the convolution inequality is not a special case or a generalization of the inequality for products. I propose thus moving the section on the convolution inequality to a new article “Young's convolution inequality”. Jvohn (talk) 12:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fork convolution inequality
Talk:Manitou (disambiguation)

message: Surely, this deserves a page -- a small one anyway.
I was looking for information on it, not on the towns or the game.
: Added a few links for Manitou as the Great Sprit. The Manitou-figure as a figure in modern culture (Movies, TV, RPG, books etc) almost needs an article of its own. Terminalproducts 10:11, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manitou the Algonquin Great Spirit
Template talk:CLC diesels

message: Please note that while there were other models of C-liners, the ones shown here were the types operated by CN or CP, and I am therefore assuming that these units were constructed by CLC.  If it known that CLC manufactured other types not purchased by Canadian roads for export to the US, or if some of the types listed were imported into Canada after US F-M manufacture, and were also never produced by CLC, please let me know.  Fawcett5 14:38, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  C-liners
Talk:Classifier (mathematics)

message: I don't understand --- why was the redirect information destroying? Compare this article to Pattern recognition: this article is a strict subset of that one. I folded information from here into there, left Statistical classification as a stubby interstitial article. 
We could redirect directly to Pattern recognition, but I thought people would get confused warping directly from classifier (mathematics) to pattern recognition. 
As it stands now, we have two very redundant articles, which seems like poor organization. 
-- hike395 14:53, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, how about a compromise? Just like having a stubby statistical classification, with the main information being at Pattern recognition, how about the same thing here? Made the edit. -- hike395 15:15, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Al Hansen

message: Removed link to Wikipedia List of Jews. An interview with his daughter, Bibbe Hansen, indicates that her mother (Al's wife) was Jewish, but that her father was not. See http://www.bibbe.com/index_photos.htm for verification. Arevich 14:54, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:British Academy of Film and Television Arts

message: The Wikipedia text says
'Today's BAFTA award – including the bronze mask and marble base ....'
Unfortunately the word 'marble' is incorrect. Marble is metamorphosed limestone (CaCO3) - the base shows clear outlines of crystals of feldspar, not calcium carbonate. The base is made of an igneous Norwegian rock from Larvik & hence called 'larvikite'. It takes a good polish & the crystals have a 'shimmer' effect.
Many kitchen worktop suppliers & monumental masons make the same mistake - polished rocks tend to be marble or granite. In this case neither is correct.
SW Geologist (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  BAFTA Award base 

message: The Rising Star trophy for 2015 appears to be glass or plastic? 2.26.202.55 (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plastic trophy?
Talk:Gustaf de Laval

message: Karl Gustaf Patrik de Laval.  I have seen him also called Charles G.P. de Laval, which is the French version of his name.  Since he was from an ethnic French family living in Sweden, it is unclear how he himself spelled his name. DonPMitchell (talk) 18:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Constituencies of the Parliament of the United Kingdom

message: I believe I sort of started this category and Im thinking now I should have worked with one of my initial instincts as regards names of individual articles.  Then eg Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross would be Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross constituency and the risk of unintended duplicate articles would be rather less than at present. Laurel Bush 15:56, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi. I've jsut reverted the changes you made on this constituency's naming as - if you look at [] you'll see it has pretty much been a de  facto standard to use an ampersand and '(constituency)' in the articile naming. --Vamp:Willow 13:26, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied from [[User talk:Laurel Bush]]:

message: Why on Earth have all the constituencies been renamed contrary to policy? We don't pre-emptively disambiguate except in a very very few circumstances. Constituencies aren't one of these, or, well, haven't been. Especailly, paranthetical disambiguation is only to be used in necessary situations, because it looks dire.
James F. (talk) 11:05, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And in any case, why are the constituencies named "[Whatever] UK Parliament constituency" when the category is "UK Parliamentary constituencies"? If you're going to have such disambiguation at all, then "Parliamentary" fits much better IMO. Loganberry 00:37, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to me it is the category which is misnamed. Scottish Parliament constituecies are also parliamentary, and they are in the UK. Also, four areas of the UK have now at least two types of constituency (devolved parliament/assembly and House of Commons/UK Parliament): very often (perhaps usually) different types of constituency share the same name (without sharing the same boundaries) (See United Kingdom constituencies). Also, towns, counties, etc, may share the same name. In most cases a parenthetical disambiguator is essential. Laurel Bush 12:09, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Laurel that the parenthetical disambiguator is essential in most cases, but I would add that it is very confusing to have some constituencies with the disambiguator, and some without.  Much better to be consistent, and add (UK Parliament consituency) or (UK Parliamentary consituency) in every case.  Personally, I can see a case for either usage, but whichever one is chosen, it is needed in every case.  --BrownHairedGirl 16:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argh
Talk:Municipal police

message: one should perhaps mention, that the shown patch of the Munich City Police is from about 1960, and the city police does not exist anymore for about 40 years.--88.217.60.254 (talk) 08:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Munich 

message: I suggest the inclusion of BAMP in the article.
{Bryard 23:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Metropolitan Police (Buenos Aires)]] 

message: There is a link about our friends of the Municipal Guards of  Algeria: 
http://english.cri.cn/6966/2011/03/07/2743s624679.htm
Please, if any Algerian Municipal Guard or a Wikipeidian Law enforcement agent read this, plase, put the information on the article, in Arabic , English,French, and other laguages.
Thanks.
Bryard 00:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipal Guards (Algeria)
Talk:Nat Love

message: Please tell us when he dies! we need to know for a project and the info is unreliable on his death.
----
Looks like an immature person defaced the page - 9/29/05 - Vampkiller93 18:11, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not anymore it doesn't - Spirit Stiff (talk) 02:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A website that openly cites Wikipedia (WP:REFLOOP) in articles such as https://www.legendsofamerica.com/african-american-history-united-states/ is extremely unlikely to be a reliable source for a Wikipedia article. I have removed the named reference "legends" from the article and replaced it by  when no other citation was present. I have also removed the previously-challenged "Nate" pronounciation. The relevant policy is Wikipedia:Verifiability and its sections WP:BURDEN and WP:REFLOOP. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:54, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is basic history class stuff.  See BLUE.  Maybe they don't teach this in school these days.  There are several Hollywood treatments and TV films about the guy.  His name was always pronounced "Nate", not "Nat."  I can't find anything yet stating why he, or others, spelled his name that way, which really isn't surprising, as people can spell and pronounce their names any way they like.  GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

text: I'm confused as to why his autobiography The Life and Adventures OF NAT LOVE isn't being used as the citation?  I specifically remember in his Autobiography that he wrote about bumping into Bat after roping that cannon; Billy when he paid for Bat's drink (I think?); and Pat when saying he worked in El Paso, Texas after the famous shooting.  I do lack the book now, so I admit I could be off, and I don't know the pages.  I believe the Bat story is after the Deadwood competition, and the part about Billy and Pat were either right before or soon after he began writing about life as a Pullman.  The meeting between he and Bat is also documented in Bat's biography Bat Masterson by Richard O'Connor, if my memory's right- again, I don't have access to it right now either.  Both can be found, however, in the NMSU Las Cruces library.--70.120.225.174 (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Legends of America"
Talk:Gray

message: Since there is a seperate, non-color, gray page. I unlinked talk:gray to talk:grey. Hope this doesn't offend anyone. Naufana : talk 19:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  talk:gray 

message: Gray is a SI unit, there should be a dissambiguation page here, not a redirect to "Grey". Edit button is unavailable. shit— Preceding unsigned comment added by  201.253.70.51   (talk • contribs)   2011-03-21T09:56:45 
:There is already a disambiguation page that you can view/edit here: Gray (disambiguation) +mt 19:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 
Talk:Paris bid for the 2012 Summer Olympics

message: Paris was the favourite all the way through.  Could someone elaborate in the article the reason's for Paris's loss? - Hahnchen 01:37, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did Paris lose? 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:LiveText

message: Deleted the following and replaced with a redirect to Hypertext:
:Text that is 'alive' in the sense that it changes, because it is being read on a Wiki-like hypertext platform. Constitutions are also sometimes referred to as 'living documents', because of constantly updated laws.
This is little more than a dictionary definition (for a made-up word, at that), which confuses two distinct concepts.  ISTM that the second sentence could be the subject of a meaningful article on the changing interpretation of statutory and constitutional texts over time, but by itself it contributes nothing (and I don't have the time or expertise to write that article myself). RussBlau 17:27, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi,
LiveText is also a software, and there's a link to this software on this page. 
So, the auto-redirection to the "hypertext" page is not good...
But i do not know Wikipedia enough to change that by myself ^^"
(ps: apologizes for my english)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.243.167.162 (talk) 10:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for finding those links. The first one I can't access, so it could be something but I wouldn't know without paying for a subscription. The second one appears to be a press release or other promotional text due to claims such as "the market leader in software for faculty to test, evaluate and improve student learning, and LiveText, the market leader of evidence-based performance evaluation of student learning achievement" and goes on to announce a partnership. The third one is reporting on what the company itself announced. Elaenia (talk) 18:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If you beleive this is not sufficient evidence of notability and you have done your own research and considered alternatives to deletion, you are welcome to bring this to WP:AFD. ~Kvng (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection ? 

message: Evidence of notability: , , . ~Kvng (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for finding those links. The first one I can't access, so it could be something but I wouldn't know without paying for a subscription. The second one appears to be a press release or other promotional text due to claims such as "the market leader in software for faculty to test, evaluate and improve student learning, and LiveText, the market leader of evidence-based performance evaluation of student learning achievement" and goes on to announce a partnership. The third one is reporting on what the company itself announced. Elaenia (talk) 18:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If you beleive this is not sufficient evidence of notability and you have done your own research and considered alternatives to deletion, you are welcome to bring this to WP:AFD. ~Kvng (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:DEPROD]]
Talk:Saif Ali Khan

message: :Category:Pataudi family Serial wiki user (talk) 18:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Category has been marked for deletion per prior CfD discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 20:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 August 2020 

message: The intro notes that he was born Sajid Ali Khan; this implies that he legally changed his name at some point. Do we have a source to support the name change?
More to the point, is Saif his legal name or a stage name? —C.Fred (talk) 02:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of name? 

message: Add Indian former Muslims & Indian agnostics 2601:283:4D82:93C0:65F2:4846:5233:F7E (talk) 21:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 09:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 December 2023
Talk:2000 Ukrainian constitutional referendum

message: Also, if the voters approved Q3 and Q4, the reader would be interested to know why those were not implemented into the consitution. This would be useful, unlike speculations above. --Irpen 21:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Q3, Q4

message: The will of people was not implemented, and anyone who raise a question about federalization are labeled as separatist  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.120.137.72 (talk) 00:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 14 years passed
Talk:Johann Hari

message: He's about to publish a new book. When can that be added to the Wikipedia article for an author? It's already scheduled and he's enough of a pro to be confident it will actually happen, too. But now that I think about it that way, anything that prevented it from reaching the market at this stage would be worth mentioning in the article... Shanen (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When should new books be added? 

message: Now the air seems to have cleared a little, I was planning to try to clean up the scandal section a bit.
I've started by breaking out the 2011 scandal into its own section - I think that's reasonable, it seems to be a reasonably well-defined and notable section of Hari's life.
Currently a lot of this content is in the form of lists of single-sentence paragraphs that just say things like "Hari was also found to have...".  When did he do this, who found it out, where was it reported, what effect did that have, how did it relate to other accusations and revelations?
Basically, the section needs to read as a narrative, not a laundry list.  (This also means parts of this content may turn out to belong in other sections, if they aren't related to the 2011 scandal.) TSP (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidying up scandal content 

message: I'm curious about his Swiss background. Interviews with him refer to his father being an immigrant from Switzerland to Scotland (I presume, because his mother is Scottish and he was born in Glasgow). But what then? The infobox gives him citizenship of United Kingdom and Switzerland. How do we know the latter is correct? I haven't seen any references that ever mention any connection he has to Switzerland, other than his father. Hari is also described as "British-Swiss" in the opening sentence. Is that correct? Is that how he sees himself? I don't know. Compare to how Wikipedia introduction sections describe Michael Portillo as British, Emma Raducanu as British, Keanu Reeves as Canadian and Naomi Osaka as Japanese. Mika is useful because whilst he's described as "Lebanese-born British", his infobox stating US citizenship is backed up by a reference. This takes me back to Johann Hari. Should "British-Swiss" be replaced with "British" and/or should the Switzerland citizenship be take out? Seaweed (talk) 17:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switzerland 

message: I was forced to leave my own country. 77.98.20.186 (talk) 11:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forced to leave.