lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health

message: There is no development of this article as the article Velankanni is getting lot of inputs and has lot of required information. It is time to merge this article with Velankanni article as both are to speak the same contents.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrownyCat (talk • contribs) 00:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly appose this move. This is about an important church building and is rated as Rated B-class, Mid-importance by WikiProject Christianity in India. This church is one of the most famous in India and the most famous catholic church in south India. This article should stay. The reason that there is no improvement is not a valid one. Let it stay as a stub, if it has to. But please do not merge it with an article about a governmental jurisdiction. --Jayarathina (talk) 13:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better merge with this with Velankanni article 
Talk:Mu Revealed

message: This article needs overall improvement, but before I cleaned it up I wanted to know if there is even a legitimate need for this article.  This page suggests the existence of Muror is a hoax: Cult archaeology introduction.  But that might just confirm that it is indeed "mythical". –DeweyQ 04:00, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Well, even as fictional civilizations go - and here I'd probably put "apocryphal" or "alleged" civilizations as opposed to "fictional" (fiction is admittedly a deceit; believing your own b.s. is not fiction).  And to be frank I was expecting there to be quite a bit more here, such as maps and theories from Churchward, and everyone since; not that any of it's valid, although tidbits of it are very interesting and amazingly cognizant (such as Churchward's theories of gas pockets in the mantle).  But definitely Mu/Muror is notable among "fictional civilizations", whether via Churchward of the Theosophists or others who have idolized or popularized it; it's tied into the Shasta mythology, and others.  And Churchward, although this article isn't about him directly, is as notable as Velikovsky or Von Daeniken or Sitchin, in terms of cult-archaeologists/historains - he's one of the earliest.  And again, I don't know if "fictional" is the right word here; this stuff people believe, it's not a sham (unlike, say, T. Lobsang Rampa's account of Tibetan civilization and religion).Skookum1 00:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:I Love New York

message: If you can source the July 15 and spin this right maybe you can get this in the WP:OTD rotation, especially for the 50th Anniversary.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:OTD
Talk:Nobunaga's Ambition

message: I think the article should discuss the entire series instead of focusing on the first title, only. SharkD 02:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Project scope

message: I've just done some major overhaulig of this article and I'm pretty pleased with the end result.  The only thing still irking me is the "reception" section.  I've scrounged together the only reviews and references I could find, but they aren't much and I'm still dubious as to how usable they are.  Unfortunately, I couldn't find a single formal review of this game anywhere.  There's not a single professional listing on either Metacritic or GameSpot.  Until somebody can dig these up or find another source for references (like a gaming magazine from 1988) I don't know what else to do. Gamer Junkie 01:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article overhaul

message: Wondering why games after the 3rd one are not listed in here, is it only because they are not released in North America and Europe?
--24.84.54.220 20:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game listing 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_4_games_(M-Z)
referances a game called "Nobunaga's Ambition Online" released in Japan on Mar 19, 2014. It is not currently on this page. Does it belong here? (added?)  --70.91.178.187 (talk) 14:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Title
Talk:Havergal College

message: Addressed. --MarcusLeland (talk) 20:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Environmentalism

message: Hi! I am planning to move content currently in the "Critique of environmentalism" section of Environmental justice to the criticism and alternative views part of this page without much revision of the content. If anyone has any thoughts or concerns, please let me know. Zaelzo (talk) 17:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Planning to move forward with this shortly. Zaelzo (talk) 05:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, if anyone has any thoughts feel free to share them here. I kind of think the See also section is like a less helpful version of the Green politics template so I'm not really sure what purpose it serves. The Michael Chricton paragraph seems like potentially undue weight since it is only about his opinion. Zaelzo (talk) 05:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good move but the section is weak. I agree with you on Chricton. A wider problem seems to me due to the fact that the page fails to provide an interpretation of the broad catalogue of environmentalists' ideas and the criticism section adds to the catalogue rather than an interpretation. It tends to portray criticism directed to a (non existing) single or main perspective. I have recently rewritten the Italian page (ambientalismo, hopefully you may machine translate it) drawing extensively from solid textbooks. The criticism is not yet covered but the fundamental threads of E. are, attempting to go beyond the catalogue approach. Perhaps it may offer some ideas.  Tytire (talk) 21:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving content from Environmental justice page to this page
Talk:Ad astra

message: Ad Astra e "per aspera ad astram" are different concepts. "Per Aspera ad Astra" is a renown latin sentence, a motto. and is not related or confused with "ad Astra"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheLoneRanger (talk • contribs) 15:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old comments 

message: It seems that the per aspera Ad Astra is going to be merged into this page as a distinct variant.  When that is done, the link to "Ad Astra per aspera" in the Apollo_1 article would presumably be updated to point to this page instead.
While much of the list-like mentions of the phrase will (and should) be abridged, the plaque for "the crew of Apollo 1" is notable enough to be kept. It is seen in the Armageddon (1998 film). The "Dedicated to the living memory of the crew of the Apollo 1" plaque is quoted at the end of Wayne Hale's Requiem for the NASA Space Shuttle program.
The NASA plaque image already appears in the Apollo_1 article but preserving it in the merged page (with the link back to the crew of Apollo 1) is important as well.  Many people who are too young to remember the Apollo 1 themselves still associate the phrase with space exploration having been inspired by or exposed to it through Armageddon (1998 film), notable Engineers like Wayne Hale or newer sci-Fi films like Ad_Astra_(film). Annette Maon (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge comments 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. With the modification proposed by Crouch, Swale regarding WP:DABNAME. (closed by non-admin page mover) estar8806 (talk) ★ 19:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ad astra (phrase) →  – All other uses of "ad astra" derive from the Latin phrase, so shouldn't the phrase get top billing? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 March 2024
Talk:Moron

message: I've removed a couple of entries and rearranged the page seeing as it has now been designated a disambiguation page. Specifically, I removed a couple of entries relating to foreign language terms spelled the same way. I also removed the line referring to its use as a perjorative because there is no article to link to and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. SilentC 00:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The obvious link is to insult and I've added it. 86.145.56.217 (talk) 10:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

text: It's covered under Moron (psychology). I don't think there's lot more that can be said about it, although plenty of people seem to think they need to add their acquaintances' names to it. Actually if you look at the article's history, you'll get plenty of examples of what a moron is :) SilentC (talk) 05:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it should not be under that rubric. The technical term 'moron', as once used by psychologists, was not an insult. I have moved the insult definition to a bullet point of its own.  I remain dissatisfied with 'Moron (psychology), disused term for a person with a mental age between 8 and 12' definition. An eight year old with such a mental age would not (one hopes) have been called a moron by psychologists. 86.145.56.217 (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up
Talk:Mickey

message: I came here to find out what is the meaning of the US term to "slip someone a Mickey". Perhaps someone can add it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commking (talk • contribs) 05:06, 10 May 2005
:It means to put a knockout drug in their drink. I'll add it. --Slac 21:30, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I came here
Talk:Limbu script

message: Whoever wrote this article, please explain what "using a vowel carrier letter with the appropriate dependent vowel attached" means.
: I did not write this article. However, according to onmiglot, there is a definite character in Sirijanga abugida which is used when words begin with a vowel. Please see this page for more details. Regards.--Eukesh (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The image with the character set says "(c) Chemjong". If it is copyrighted, Wikipedia cannot use it. 86.153.8.180 (talk) 18:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Talk:Multi-scale fingerboard

message: This article seems to have some good information that adds a new dimension to the article called Fingerboard.  It looks like it has first-person POV and some strange formatting that I can't figure out.  –DeweyQ 05:43, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Fanned Fret Guitars shall be integrated here. --Trofobi (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevant & sourced parts of the sections "Ralph Novak" & his "History" shall be moved to Novax Guitars. --Trofobi (talk) 23:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Although Greenfield does make multiscale acoustic guitars, the section on Negative Neck Angle has nothing to do with this topic. It should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.243.80.62 (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: a fingerboard/fretboard whose non-parallel frets are positioned as a fan
::fan-fretted instruments  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4121:5400:60F4:C3B3:1933:958 (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: ''adjective'': fan-fretted
Talk:Corby (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Can anyone confirm the UKIP vote number, please?
We have currently 478. The Times and Daily Telegraph have 12078 which looks wrong.
The BBC and Corby Borough Council have 1278 which looks reasonable.  --Cavrdg 07:09, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Electoral Commission gives 1,278 as the figure from the Returning Officer and I have therefore changed the table (belatedly!) David | Talk 12:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  UKIP Vote 

message: The name of the constituency is 'Corby' -- see . The current MP has a habit of referring to it as 'Corby and East Northamptonshire', but this is not accurate. Duncan Keith (talk) 20:57, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right. Many constituencies are named for one town or settlement whist ignoring all others. It's not Wikipedia's responsibility to 'improve' the work of the Boundary Commission for England. This constituency is called "Corby" and has been for some time. That's the end of it. doktorb wordsdeeds 21:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

text: The name of the constituency has been renamed now Cal3000000 (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of constituency 
Talk:Abernathy, Texas

message: I corrected the geographical info on Abernathy.  I used to live there just two houses north of the county line (which is 4th Street) in Hale County.  Most of the town is in Hale County.  H2O 07:22, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the name abernathy is so meaningful to me, every time i hear it im about to cry!!! it is like my life story. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.6.39.227 (talk) 00:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abernathy rocks (like pop rocks) 
Talk:California State Route 14

message: The CalNEXUS report lists the exit. It's also visible on Google Maps Street View here. The advance sign shows the exit number, while the sign at the exit itself still omits the number as of November 2018 when Google photographed the area. In short, it's not a "fake exit". Imzadi 1979 →  13:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit 27, Soledad Canyon Road
Talk:Led Zeppelin Biography

message: This one smells of a copyright violation, but google cannot find it. And besides, what's the need for this article, as it should be covered in Led Zeppelin anyway. andy 07:36, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Decent enough article but it's largely redundant with the main article for the band.  I suggest removal or at least a merge.  Bkhouser 20:29, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree... There are no links to other articles in this article, and it's not even more specific than the Led Zeppelin article. Merging is useless. wasbeer84 20:50, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:California State Route 58

message: Between the end of the CA-58 stub west of CA-99 and the Westside Parkway, buildings in the apparent right-of-way of a realignment of CA-58  (including houses and businesses) seem to have been demolished. Only one remains in place, and an update on the progress of building CA-58 (future Interstate 40?) as a connector to Interstate 5 would seem to be approaching construction. News articles to that effect might be worth accessing. Pbrower2a (talk) 17:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Path largely cleared for CA 58 in Bakersfield
Talk:Gingerbread (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

message: The discussion about the validity of the German spoken in the episode seems a bit too elaborate for an encyclopedic article. Is it really necessary to discuss at length improperly translated sentences by some TV writer?
::It's true the translation may not be the best, but nonetheless this is not a a significatnt element of the episode, and surely doesn't deserve to dominate the article? I have shortened it, and placed the expanded discussion below. -- Paxomen 17:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I'd say that this looks like an attempt to produce older-sounding German (Middle High German or Old High German, perhaps), albeit not a perfect one. Maybe this should be added as a redeeming note. Baranxtu 00:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  German in the episode 
Talk:Bangalore Club

message: Hmm... I've been to this place but found nothing out of the ordinary - I actually found it to be rather inferior... or maybe I don't remember correctly? But I distinctly recall it having a rather small buffet which is nothing like one woul find in an average restraunt. As a miniature city equivalent, the club is nothing compared to something like, say Downtown Disney.--GatesPlusPlus 08:35, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Sir Leo Hielscher Bridges

message: This page covers the same topic as Gateway Bridge. Someone should amalgamate them. As the Gateway Bridge is the only one of its name, I think that the content on this page should be moved in with the content on the Gateway Bridge page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathieumcguire (talk • contribs) 09:04, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They should be merged, so I've slapped merge templates on the both of them.  The article should probably live at Gateway Bridge, Brisbane for two reasons: we're not entirely certain that the Gateway Bridge is the only so-named one in the world; and reasons of consistency with the other bridges, which all follow the "X Bridge, Brisbane" format. Slac speak up! 20:16, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged the briges here on the principles were started above, that this has the most inbound links and it is better the articles are merged sooner rather than later. MeltBanana 14:33, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I'm want to insert the following reference for the length: 
*[http://www.mainroads.qld.gov.au/mrweb/Prod/Content.nsf/DOCINDEX/Gateway+Upgrade+Project+-+Gateway+History!OpenDocument
Gateway Upgrade Project - Gateway Project - Main Roads]
It's coming out looking like crap. What's the problem?
--Tphcm 06:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikicode problem 

message: Does anyone know the new timeline? It says mid 2009 for the deviation to open, but the road isn't even layed yet. I am guessing this has been delayed considerably.--58.111.133.169 (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline of openings 

message: Slight editing issue found - it says there are tolls twice and does not specify which bridges are tolled. Was the bridge tolled twice or did someone specify the toll in the wrong spot?
P.S. also mention the toll deadline pushback caused by the consolidation then privatisation of the toll road Jordf32123 (talk) 03:33, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toll timeline confusion
Talk:Dhammayuttika Nikaya

message: The equation of the Thammayut order and the Thai Forest Tradition is incorrect.  While many 20th Century monks of the forest school were ordained (or re-ordained) in the Thammayut order, the two are not synonymous- there are many Thammayut monks who were not disciples of the forest monks (such as Ajahn Mun), and there was certainly no requirement that forest monks be ordained in the Thammayut order.  I'll remove the equation of the two from the article.  Using the term 'Dhutanga' for all Thammayut monks is also incorrect- this title refers to an ascetic monk who has undertaken one or more of the ten Dhutanga practices, which, again, not all (or even most) Thammayutika did.  --Clay Collier 09:20, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here thammayut is pointed as being pali, but the pali term is dhammayutika, which means 'accordingly to the dhamma' (the teaching, rather than 'accordingly to the discipline'( that would be something like vinayayutika or silayutika). Thammayutika is only a thai-sation of dhammayutika, like tudong is of duthanga.
Perhaps it would be better to change it to Dhammayut or Dhammayutika
James Jasso
: This article should probably be renamed Dhammayuttika Nikaya, as I think the current title is an unfortunate misspelling. I was unclear as how to transcribe this especially as I have seen both in use, but when I looked for the Khmer transcription, I found ធម្មយុត្តិកនិកាយ or Dhammayuttika Nikāya, and I was unable to find Dhammayutika anywhere. So, I accordingly believe the correct Pali to be Dhammayuttika formed from dhamma + yutti (fit, suitable, in accordance with) + ka (group). Aaron Lee 00:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dhammayutika 

message: I have requested this article be moved to Dhammayuttika Nikaya. My reasons are given above, and I believe them to be uncontroversial. If there is an objection to this, please continue the discussion here.
:I've moved the page, as requested at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Uncontroversial proposals.  If there are any questions or concerns, please let me know. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move
Talk:Frank Lowy

message: Westfield is described as 'a global shopping centre company [...] in the United States, United Kingdom and Europe. While the ownership structure different, Westfield malls are widespread in its home country of Australia, and New Zealand. So perhaps United States, United Kingdom, Europe and Australasia? Thank you. JJM0070 (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Geardona (talk to me?) 22:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2024
Talk:Liz Lochhead

message: Material from http://www.nls.uk/writestuff/heads/wee-lochhead.html, and possibly elsewhere. Charles Matthews 09:27, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Aah yes, so it is. Didn't notice that before I started editing. Should we label is a copyright violation then? Twrist 11:54, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looking at the list of references now in place on the article, and the date of the tag (2012), I think we'd be good to remove it?  Thoughts? Lirazelf (talk) 11:23, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Normally I might suggest asking the editor who added the tag in the first place, but in this case they seem to be indefinitely blocked. I would say go ahead and remove it.  --Deskford (talk) 14:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and done! Thanks. Lirazelf (talk) 15:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs additional sources tag 

message: Just heard this excellent short radio drama on a witch hunt in Northumbria - I guess the author is the same person: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/b00761fp Shtove (talk) 05:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maleficium
Talk:Slope field

message: The reference cited does not have a characterization of slope fields this general, so there is a major chance this is seriously flawed.  I figured it was better than no article at all, since someone may fix it very soon. Jonathan48 10:01, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: It's a start, but...

message: I need some (not very long) online reference on slope fields.
I am especially interested how integral curves are related with slope fields.
Images of integral curves are curves through slope fields, aren't them? Please help to describe this idea exactly.
And moreover (to pointing a reference on this topic), such theorems should be explicitly formulated and added to the Wikipedia article.
See also http://math.stackexchange.com/q/1882515/4876
--VictorPorton (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for properties of slope fields 

message: In my opinion the pictures only are the graphical representation of the slope field, itself being the map of the slopes. Madyno (talk) 13:04, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture