lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Butterfly (Crazy Town song)

message: The copy I own has five tracks, not two, and a different cover.  Said tracks include:
;Notes
∗Contains a sample from "Pretty Little Ditty" (Flea, John Frusciante, Anthony Kiedis, Chad Smith) Screen Gems–EMI Music Publishing (BMI)/Moebetoblame Music (BMI), as recorded by the Red Hot Chili Peppers, courtesy of and under license from Capitol/EMI (America) records.
∗∗Remix by Jazzy Jim & Ricky Brown for Straight Hits Entertainment mixed by Larry Funk
††Remixed by Justin Warfield and Jay Baumgarner remixed at NRG Studios (North Hollywood, CA) additional guitars: Squirrel
A&R: Tim Devine
All previously unreleased except †taken from the Columbia release The Gift of Game (63654)
allixpeeke (talk) 02:09, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing 

message: The copy I own has a different cover than the one depicted here, as well as three tracks not listed here.  Here is what the cover of the version I own looks like.  allixpeeke (talk) 04:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single cover 

message: There has been some confusion about music critic Matthew Wilkening's writing about this song. As excerpted in the article, he said "Think you like this? Sure you don't really like the song where it came from better?" However, with the phrase "song where it came from" he included a hyperlink to a recording of "Pretty Little Ditty" (by the Red Hot Chili Peppers) on YouTube. Thus, he is clearly asserting that "Pretty Little Ditty" is the "song where it ['Butterfly'] came from". This assertion was not preserved in the process of quoting Wilkening, making his meaning unclear when in fact it was quite clear in the original source. I would like to edit the article to more accurately reflect Wilkening's statement; please suggest how this may be done without causing anyone to miss the fact that the identification of "Pretty Little Ditty" comes from him.
Side note: The sampling of "Pretty Little Ditty" should probably be mentioned even earlier, since it's a noticeable component of the composition. I just thought the most obvious place to start with would be where a source had already brought it up.
Thanks for your thoughts. Jerodast (talk) 22:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pretty Little Ditty" reference from Wilkening source
Talk:Bottom ash

message: --Alex 12:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

message: 'The clinkers fall by themselves into the water or sometimes by poking manually, and get cooled.'  Eh?  What water?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.131.53.2 (talk) 22:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  So copy edit it. I don't like "get" myself, but I doubt that this has much support in style guides, especially not here at us:WP. "By themselves" is reasonable, as it assumes gravity is pervasive but is highlighting the absence of a mechanical ash rake. Also clinker is regularly used as a countable noun in furnace design, as some clinkers can be six feet long and very hard to remove. Ideally they might be a granular free-flowing mass, but as single welded clinkers are such a probably when they build up, and to remove afterwards, then considering them countable is appropriate. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water 
Talk:Stourport-on-Severn

message: The local amatuer football team, other than Stourport Swifts is Abberley Vale FC, www.themightyvale.co.uk
:I have to be brutally honest here and say that Kidderminster & District Division 6 may not be considered quite notable enough for a mention! :P Loganberry (Talk) 12:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some talk I picked up from somewhere suggested that the "on-Severn" part was added later by the Post Office to prevent confusion with nearby Stourbridge. I'm still looking for cites, but can anyone confirm or deny this? ---- FlipC 09:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Town Name

message: Wiki is not a crystal ball. Predictions for the future with no forseable outcome are not of encyclopedic value until they become confirmed projects that  can be sourced and referenced. the following  passage has been removed until it  can  be substantiated:
::A new Tesco store has also been granted planning permission, it will be built on the previous Carpets of Worth site and will feature a food store and petrol station. It is unknown when construction work will begin. This has been a contriversial issue in the area, with many surrounding housing estates and residents have been campaigning against the proposed store. It is also thought that new housing will be built on the southern part of the site in the future. 
--Kudpung (talk) 05:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Predictions
Talk:Monsta Island Czars

message: I know someone disagrees, but IMO the aliases should definitely link to the rappers real names (at least for those that have pages). It can get a bit confusing trying to work out which alias a rapper is most known as, e.g. Megalon or Tommy Gunn? I dont really care though. Do what you want!
--internet: serious business 12:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Due to inactivity the group ceased activity? This does not make sense  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A31C:8439:B380:B0C9:D33:21E9:BCAB (talk) 19:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   "Due to inactivity and DOOM's death in 2020, the group ceased activity." 

message: Most of their mcs were from Long Island, Such as King Geedorah, Kong. Megalon, and Xray. NorthCentralKing (talk) 06:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I believe MIC was formed in Long Island, New York, 

message: MF DOOM is from Long Beach, Long Island (hence the Monsta "Island.") NorthCentralKing (talk) 11:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  MF DOOM is NOT from NYC
Talk:Jugnu Mohsin

message: This page is a copy of this article and is violating copyright. --Wafulz 12:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: I've been working on this article for the past day or two to try to correct its problem with sourcing. Very few of the article's claims could be easily verified; I'm having trouble even finding some basic verification of facts, like her Cambridge education. So for now I've boiled the article just down to the 1999 kidnapping incident for which she and Sethi are most famous. I'll keep searching databases and see if I can build this one back up organically. Alternatively, if any Urdu-speaking editors are watching this, you might have more luck there than I am in English. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 11:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing unsourced information
Talk:Les Gueux

message: I've merged Geuzen and Watergeuzen here, I think this is the right place for the article, but if someone knows a different designation which is more common in English, we can move it. We will probably need assistance from an admin to move it to one of the names that redirect here now. But discuss first. Piet 12:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: A very nice start, but needs a little cleanup. In particular, the first line of the article is not a proper sentence. There's no verb. LordAmeth 08:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: The article is a definite improvement on what was there before, but why switch from Dutch to French for the title? It was after all a Dutch movement, and nothing to do with the French, though obviously the origin of the word is (archaic) French. "Sea Beggars" is used in the article so why not use that? It is after all an English article and this is the commonly used name in English texts and even appears on Dutch websites. e.g.  The redirects take care of the others. Chris55 15:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I renamed it to "Gueux" because I saw the French word used in English texts. I have since seen the English version used as well. I don't know what's most common but feel free to change if you see a good reason. Btw. Dutch websites (even when written in English) are not good sources to decide what the correct English version is. We should use what is most common in English texts. And off course the article should use the same version as the title. Piet | Talk 15:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

text: thinking about it a bit more, the original "Geuzen" is the broader term and probably preferable. e.g. EB uses it as its headword. The "Watergeuzen" were only one part, even tho the most effective and if they are both treated in the same article then the generic term is better. (My comment about the Dutch site was merely that it seemed acceptable in the Netherlands, not that we should follow it :-) Chris55 07:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious name
Category talk:Recipients of the Victoria Cross

message: This category should only contain subcategories and not individuals, right? (as per Manual of Style guidelines). Should we remove the "Victoria Cross recipients" category from the 80, at time of writing, individuals here (after ensuring, of course, that they are in one of the valid subcategories). Diverman 12:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spent mushroom compost

message: --Alex 12:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

message: The formula as presently given in the article includes chalk.  Very strange, unless the source materials are severely acidic and the chalk is needed to neutralize the acid.  I live in an area with numerous mushroom growing plants and none of them use chalk in their compost, nor do they use horse or cattle manure, although there is plenty of that available in the area.  They also don't use blood.  The formula typically consists of straw, peat moss and poultry manure.  The soil in my area is heavy adobe for the most part, rather alkaline, but they don't use any of it in their mix. The spent compost doesn't alter the the pH of the soil appreciably, nor is it depleted of nitrogen, as evidenced by the lush, dark green growth when it is spread on lawns.  Sorry, I can't provide a reference; this is from direct observation, as I just hauled in one ton of the stuff yesterday for the vegetable garden.  The components of the mix were readily visible at the mushroom plant, stored in the open.—QuicksilverT @ 16:43, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other formulations
Talk:Tangerine Tree

message: *Note graphics; add some samples
*TT set 9
*TL6
--Gadget850 ( Ed) 23:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ToDo

message: I just wikified the whole article.  It is amazing the number of concert halls and churches with articles.  I also anglicized Koln > Cologne and Firenze > Florence, as those are the article names.  It could use a bit more cleanup, as the venues were originally cut & past from the tree files and they are not always consistent.   --Gadget850 ( Ed) 21:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: *It was reported to me that the image for Tangerine Tree 35: Birmingham 1986 is actually TL35.  I will have to check this out later, as it is no longer online. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 12:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was correct- I replaced the image with the proper one. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 10:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: How can it be in the Nakano Sun Plaza in Nakano, Tokyo, but in Osaka? This cannot be right! --Zilog Jones (talk) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 14:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tangerine Tree 72 

message: I don't understand the addition of these bootlegs to this section. These are bootlegs that do not have a tree release. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 18:17, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other releases
Talk:Reynaldo Hill

message: I think the Reynaldology section in worthy but I think it could be implicated in terms of vanity.  I think a compromise would be to keep the section valid and remove individual forum members and links and to closer represent the original section written by me when it was first made. Thnom 12:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compromise 
Talk:List of philosophers born in the centuries BC

message: I would like to propose renaming this list to List of philosophers born in the centuries B.C.E.. See the article B.C.E.. I don't think the dating system should be christocentric. Comments?--Anthony Krupp 12:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? Change away. Before you do that though, you'll have to track what pages already link to this one as "BC" so you can change them to "B.C.E."Non-vandal 13:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here're the other pages, not manyNon-vandal 13:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

message: In my own fork, I have started something like so and wondered if it would be useful in Wikipedia:
 Philosophers BC
Name (dates)                             	Birth	Death	Location	School	Known for
A                                        	A    	A    	A       	A     	A
Aenesidemus, (1st century BC)            	     	     	        	      	
Alcibiades, (c. 450-404 BC)         	     	     	        	      	
Alcmaeon of Croton, (5th century BC)     	     	     	        	      	
Anacharsis, (6th century BC)             	     	     	        	      	
Anaxagoras, (died 462 BC)*          	     	     	        	      	
Anaxarchus, (fl. 340 BC)            	     	     	        	      	
Anaxilaus, (1st century BC)              	     	     	        	      	
Anaximander, (c. 610-c. 546 BC)     	     	     	        	      	
Anaximenes of Miletus, (585-525 BC) 	     	     	        	      	
Andronicus of Rhodes, (c. 70 BC)    	     	     	        	      	
Angiras, (c. 11th century BC)            	     	     	        	      	
Anniceris, (fl. 300 BC)             	     	     	        	      	
Antiochus of Ascalon, (c. 130-68 BC)	     	     	        	      	
* Antiphon, (480-403 BC)
... and so on
There is no corresponding timeline. The table starts off as an alphabetical index, but I find the ordering my dates is more useful for my analysis. The other column headers could be changed...
This suggestion applies to similar lists, where list or index may no longer be an ideal term.
Dpleibovitz (talk) 20:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  In table sortable by year born?
Talk:Postcondition

message: Would it make sense to merge postcondition and precondition? --Abdull 13:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a perfectly fine for an example, and might even sense for a weakly typed language which may not have an explicit integer type (like Javascript).  Why would it not be dynamically testable? If (result != Integer(result)) then it probably means the result is larger than can be stored as an integer (or alternatively the result is outside the integer bounds of its floating-point representation) and will likely cause problems later on.  Good reason to use the postcondition! 198.175.154.212 (talk) 15:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is absolutely a necessary postcondition. In a language such as Javascript, I frequently set preconditions/postcondition that the argument/return value satisfy my isNumeric function.  In other languages, it's just a coincidence that you can generally interpret as an integer any returned result (because the return result is likely a single word, which is likely the size of the basic integer type, which is likely non-nullable/non-NaN-able).  However, even with a statically-typed language this isn't necessarily the case (e.g. if you're using a nullable number type or a not-necessarily-integer type such as floating point).  Brian Geppert (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Changesbowie

message: Is this really called ChangesBowie? Why would it be? I would have thought the placement of the artist name was stylistic. 109.150.191.42 (talk) 22:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Meghna Heli Bridge

message: It has been asserted in the Intro that Operation  Cactus Lily is generally regarded as the brainchild of Maj. Gen. (later Lt. Gen.) Sagat Singh. However, this is not true. OCL was approved by the DMO in Delhi as early as August of 1971. Faizul Latif Chowdhury (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a brainchild of Sagat Singh 

message: :They are the same page.  You moved the page by cutting and pasting text.  Registered users can rename pages while preserving edit history.  You can see this edit history by clicking the history tab.  An administrator is going to go and take the history of the page and merge it around.  They technically delete the page while doing this, if only for a moment, which is probably why a deletion tag is used.  No harm will come to the page, we just need make it easy to find out who edited the page a year ago.  After its complete, the history of Helibridge over Meghna (you can see it here: []) will go from being a lengthy edit history to a single edit of a page move.  The history of this article will then become even longer.  Hope this explains it.  Kevin_b_er 18:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs a map --AW 17:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Ziegler–Natta catalyst

message: why is the C in the middle bonded to two Hs at first and only one later?
I don't think it has two Hs at first. it wouldn't work with valence either  —Preceding unsigned comment added by FelixP (talk • contribs) 
:You are right, there seem to be some mistakes in the picture.  But I think there should be two (the activator is diethylaluminiumchloride, ethyl groups on aluminum), the binding to the metal center is an agostic bond (electrons of the bond between C and H are donated into empty metal centre bonds).  --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mechanism

message: I am curious if this catalyst is what makes the "Ziegler Process"? Maury 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the "Ziegler Process"? 

message: This is perhaps the first article I have come to with a "C" grade, and it is richly deserved.  Those who have posted this material should themselves look for colleagues able to write the broad introduction present in better articles and missing here.  I would suggest separating treatment of 50 year old Ziegler-Natta liquid-and-metal catalysts, which began by breaking carbon double-bonds to get molecule chaining (polymerization) started, from later developments.  Deal separately with metallocene catalysts having engineered shapes that controlled isotactic and syndiotactic sequencing of the growing chain.  That separation gives us a chance for a simpler treatment of polymer chain basics -- getting them started -- in an introduction that comes to isotactic and syndiotactic issues separately, explicitly, and later on.  Mentioning milestone historic developments in the field would organize the intro and aid the entry overall; mention John A. Ewen and metallocene advances in the early 1990s.  Exxon's attempt to crush him, and the lawsuit and conviction he won against Exxon in 1995 would add some spice and illustrate the high stakes here, wouldn't they? 
--jerryJerry-va (talk) 18:56, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truly a C-grade Wikipedia Article
Talk:Nine.com.au

message: this table needs cleaning up/replacing with a template. i'll do it maybe tomorrow. if anyone wants to do it before hand feel free. Jpeob 13:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The correct name is ninemsn, not NineMSN.  See this page, and the rest of the ninemsn website, where it does not say NineMSN.  J Di 18:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I am surprised to see no wiki page on "nbcmsn" , and not much google either ..is it insignificant in its market ? Feroshki 09:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably because you're thinking of MSNBC. :) --Dreaded Walrus  t c 18:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: nbcmsn

message: Folks, I am empathetic to all those kids struggling with the school system. But, seriously, have we ever looked at the parents? They can't just dump the responsibility on schools. 202.3.37.141 (talk) 09:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student difficulties at school
Talk:Lackawaxen Township, Pike County, Pennsylvania

message: I propose that Lackawaxen,_Pennsylvania be merged into Lackawaxen_Township,_Pike_County,_Pennsylvania.  The content for Lackawaxen, Pennsylvania is a stub and the Lackawaxen Township content is a full-blown article and by far more informative. CoffeeSweet  20:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge reversed, given objection by TheCatalyst31 at User talk:Klbrain#Lackawaxen Township. Regarding the merge, my view is still to support merge, on the grounds that the village is best discussed in the context of the township of the same name and of which it forms an important part with an intertwined history. Klbrain (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify my objections, the township and the village are separate, and the township includes several other communities besides the village. There's source material that describes the history of the village (this book, for instance), so it can be expanded beyond a stub. While it's possible to cover every community in the township as part of the same article, that tends to make the township articles long and distracts from their main topic unless there really isn't much to say about the communities; it's the same reason we don't merge every township into the county article. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 22:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Reference "#1. "Lackawaxen Township, Pennsylvania". Lackawaxen Township, Pennsylvania. Retrieved August 11, 2012." goes to a site written entirely in Asian characters. I really wish I hadn't clicked it! Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link.
Talk:Enid J. Wilson

message: Since this is a biography, this person should be added to :Category:Living people if she's alive and her date of birth should also be included. Thanks. DarthVader 13:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wilson is dead - see link 2 below. Linuxlad 19:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information needed

message: Guardian's 'Country Diary' writers are all worthy of note in their own 'write' and Wilson has the added notability of being related to two of the 'greats' of UK rock-climbing history (Abrahams and Jones). Also take note of the following links :-  and   Linuxlad 19:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion contested
Talk:Computer-assisted reviewing

message: With the first title removed, then the table of content doesn't show the main part of the article, but directly point to secondary elements.. Is this the standard for Wikipedia ? I find it very strange.EMLM 13:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the part above the table of contents is called a lead section and should be a overview of the topic and a summary of the rest of the article. Think of it like a paragraph or so that could stand as it's own as a shorter encyclopedia article, but then the rest of the article provides further details. So you may wish to move everything down below the table of contents and write an additional paragraph to serve as a proper lead. - Taxman Talk 16:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cannery Row (novel)

message: This stub needs at minimum a literate rewrite, and ideally an expansion. --David Sewell 13:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It's been a while since I read the book, but I don't think Mack and the boys' dog, Darling, is a mongrel - I seem to remember it was a gundog of some description. Halmyre (talk) 07:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Breed Of Dog?