lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:NICE Ltd.

message: This article looks like . Family Guy Guy (talk) 23:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement?

message: I'm going through and removing obvious advertising and un-cited original research. It is worth noting that Wikipedia is not an area to advertise one's company or products!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.235.49.50 (talk) 12:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing out advertising

message: This still looks to much like an Advert, IMO.
I reckon the whole page should just be tanked.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.35.76.243 (talk) 12:41, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert 

message: Nice operates claim systems for multiple large scale health insurers.   More recently they have gone into other fields beyond healthcare, such as workforce capacity planning and administration.  The last organization I worked for used both tools, and they are common in call centers.  The article appears to be neutral POV at this time so I have removed the advert tag. 
wizbang_fl 11:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  4.  Only Seeing a Neutral Point of View [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] tagging 

message: NICE Systems, Limited (Hebrew: נייס מערכות‎) is a global software company[citation] that enables enterprises and security-sensitive organizations to prevent financial crimes and fraud, ensure security and public safety, and provide enhanced customer experiences.[citation] 
NICE systems offers integrated, multimedia recording platforms, software applications, and related professional services[citation]  for managing and analyzing various types of data from communication channels, operational systems, and other sources.[citation] The company serves various industries, including financial services, telecommunications, health care, outsourcers, retail, media, travel, service providers, transportation, and utilities.[citation]
Barak Eilam became CEO in April 2014, replacing Zeevi Bregman. Eilam was previously head of NICE Systems’ Americas business.
The company was founded in 1986 and is headquartered in Ra'anana, Israel.[citation] It has more than 3,500 employees[citation] at 35 offices around the world,[citation] and has more than 25,000 customers in 150 countries.[citation] 
http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/companyProfile?rpc=66&symbol=NICE.O
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=NICE
http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/NICE:IT
http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=NICE.O
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=NICE
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=NICE 
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=NICE 
http://www.nice.com/Documents/NICE%20by%20numbers=%20infographic_final.pdf 
Ejsnider (talk) 19:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies for the delay. The editors of Wikipedia are trying to process a backlog of 170+ edit requests. I updated the CEO change; however, I am declining the rest of the edit request because the wording is rather promotional. Please reword your submission in a more neutral tone and more concisely (i.e. do not list every single industry that the company serves). Thanks, Altamel (talk) 03:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Edit Request
Talk:Niterra

message: the grammar for this article is horrible and so I added the cleanup banner. I'll try to edit it, though im having trouble understanding what was written in the first place. ---Zachary Cohen 22:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: The photo compares a standard plug to an Iridium type.  I think illustrating the differences with a brand new plug and a sooty, used plug may be misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dustyattic (talk • contribs) 04:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo comparison 

message: non notable subsidiary, unnecessary fork pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for your explanation. As paid editor, there are certain rules that Wikipedia has in place to ensure articles are neutral and impartial. Please familiarise yourself with WP:PAID and WP:COI. In a nutshell, paid editing is strongly discouraged. Any involvement by a paid editor must be disclosed on the article's talk page and the author's page. It is also highly recommended to follow the articles for creation process instead of creating articles in main space, so that new articles can be reviewed first. In the light of this, I have merged the two articles, removing what I deem as unencyclopaedic corporate promotion or inadequately sourced. I maintain that the sources provided for the subsidiary do not pass the threshold test for individual notability. I suggest to work on the main article, following process for conflicted editors. The title NGK spark plugs europe now redirects to the parent company. Pls let me know if you have any questions about this or specifically about the paid editing or notability guidelines. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 13:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[NGK spark plugs europe]]
Talk:Nexus Books

message: If this is simply an imprint, it should be merged and redirected into Virgin Books.  A.K.Nole (talk) 18:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  A.K.Nole (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Nexans

message: This page reads like an advert!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.138.39.56 (talk) 09:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the flag 10 years later...--Wuerzele (talk) 12:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint- advert
Talk:Newton, Chambers & Co.

message: Needs an info box, more inline citations and a few images adding anybody got a photo of the factory, now or from the past ? - BulldozerD11 (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Who currently owns the Izal brand? According to a recent (April 2012) product wrapper the manufacturer is Jeyes Ltd, Brunel Way, Thetford, Norfolk. However, Jeyes now seems to be in Cambridge and there is no mention of Izal on Jeyes website. Biscuittin (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Izal
Talk:NewTel Communications

message: In many respects, I still don't know how Wikipedia works.  I uploaded a new version of the "family tree chart" but the article insists on showing the archived version instead of the current version.  Why? GBC (talk) 05:11, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  HELP! - image won't update! 

message: NewTel Enterprises does not appear to be notable for anything other than a holding company for NewTel Communications and its article is a stub unlikely to expand. K7L (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Ylee (talk) 05:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[NewTel Enterprises]]
Talk:Newsquest

message: The reference about couponstar has a link which leads to a 404. I'm not that experienced at Wiki. Any relplies?
The Daylonster (talk) 17:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Reference 

message: I'm starting this discussion here, as the page of the parent company.
*East London and West Essex Guardian covers Walthamstow, Leyton, Leytonstone, Chingford, Wanstead, Woodford, Epping Forrest. 
*Your Local Guardian] covers Croydon Sutton Wansworth Wimbledon Epsom Richmond Kingston.
Your Local Guardian redirects to Waltham Forest Guardian which is described as being renamed to Your Local Guardian but this source says the Waltham Forest Guardian became the East London and West Essex Guardian.
Is there enough material/notability about Your Local Guardian and East London and West Essex Guardian and their respective predecessors to warrant at least combined page/section?
Bogger (talk) 09:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflation of [[Your Local Guardian]] and [[East London and West Essex Guardian]]
Talk:NewCo

message: How should we sort the examples? Should we sort it alphabetically or chronologically? Best, --Minoa (talk) 18:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordering
Talk:Port of Newcastle

message: What is size of largest ship?
Tabletop (talk) 03:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of largest ship? 

message: Is the Port of Newcastle and Port Hunter one and the same? If not, what is the difference? Nurg (talk) 07:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Port Hunter
Talk:Mount Batten

message: Mount Batten in Plymouth deserves a little more than a stub article so I am attempting a major rewrite.  As it happens there is a considerable amount of reference material available on the area not least archaeological so it will take some time to do the topic justice.  One of the reasons there is so much reference material is because the area was one of three MoD sites (the others were Mount Wise and Royal William Yard) which were promoted by the Plymouth Development Corporation - a temporary urban development corporation set up in 1993 to promote regeneration of the three sites. As a result, considerable research was undertaken before any areas were allowed to be developed.
Before inserting a reference concerning the bronze mirror (there is a replica in the Plymouth City Museum) I wanted to check whether the cemetery where it was found was indeed in what is now considered the Mount Batten area.  It certainly seemed to be within the regeneration area but a definitive map of the area is needed to be certain.
Declutter (talk) 22:22, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewrite 
Talk:New York Marriott Marquis

message: I've got some other references that I'll incorporate - I'm near the bottom of the stack, and the first one I found is a little negative.  Acroterion (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following is highly unlikely to be able to be properly sourced, plus it's way too much detail for an article about a hotel.  If there is so much intrigue with the elevator system at the hotel, then an article of its own should be created, which is a problem due to aforementioned issue.  Plus, this makes little sense:
::The hotel has 36 guest room floors starting with 10 and goes to 45. The hotel features an award-winning restaurant on the top floor called "The View" accessed by the last elevator that serves 23 and 28(the internals in those 8 don't serve the fitness center on 23, instead they go directly from 8 to 28) and the first that serves 23 with the nearest evens being served. Both serve level 9 which is the Marquis Ballroom. The rest of the fast High-Rise elevators to 45 enter express zone to 23 then go to 28 and all floors to 45. As for the ones that serve the floors in the XX zone and between 23 and 28, they just go from 8(highest that all serve) to 10(lowest room floor). The 49th floor is also stooped by these(55 must be entered into a keypad). 55 is rumored to be a floor that only car G is to go to but is only 1-27 then XX zone, then the top 3. 1 is the Ground floor and is obviously the main floor. 2 is an area where the mechanics for the building are and only the staff elevators go there. 3 is the theatre and access to 47 and 48 are. 4-7 is for events. 8 is the actual main floor with the front desk, concierge, bag check, restaurant, bar, and gift shop.
That's the reason for the tag being there.  BenYes? 03:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: I have twice now reverted removal of the link to the corporation, Marriott Hotels & Resorts, in the lede. This is basic information, and "Marriott" appears without a link in the account of how the hotel came to be built. It was originally removed as "POV" along with an adjective in front of Portman's name; I entirely agree that the adjective was POV, but naming who owns the hotel I cannot see as POV in any way. On the other hand, emblazoning the infobox with the Marriott logo under the name of the hotel strikes me as pure promotionalism, so I zapped that. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking corporation name
Draft talk:New York Community Trust

message: This is an obvious spam article with a pool of single purpose accounts being used to add boastful contents. Graywalls (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is clearly a notable organization, but the article basically needs to be blown up and started fresh. I have found plenty of news coverage that can be used for this purpose, e.g., Dubois K. Wiggins, "Brooklynites Active In Community Trust", The Standard Union (February 23, 1928), p. 15. BD2412 T 19:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam
Talk:Scarborough

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Scarborough (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Scarborough (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 15:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Scarborough (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:New Orleans Records

message: Notability points:
*1) Shellac 78 record era company. I argue that record companies from this era tend to be notable in themselves, as making records in that era needed a considerable amount of industrial investment, quite unlike how easy it was to start what was called a "record company" in recent decades.
*2)Important in the New Orleans traditional jazz revival era. If the New Orleans jazz revival is notable, this label is.
*3) Notable musicians who Wikipedia has articles on recorded for label. 
-- Infrogmation (talk) 13:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't really know what "notable in themselves" means. But I do know these comments fail to distinguish between "I think this is important" and Wikipedia's rules for notability. Consequently, a lot of other people's time and effort gets wasted. Everything on Wikipedia comes from published sources. Availability of material takes precedence, otherwise there's nothing to write. We're not fiction writers. We don't make this stuff up.Vmavanti (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangon
Talk:New Look (company)

message: Most about current struggles though:
https://businessmirror.com.ph/crucial-christmas-in-store-for-3-besieged-uk-retailers/
https://www.retailgazette.co.uk/blog/2017/12/moodys-sharply-downgrades-new-look-and-house-of-fraser-amid-falling-sales/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/new-look-q3-losses-profits-crashes-fashion-chain-2017-a8041451.html
https://www.ft.com/content/5fd1b8fa-8f1b-11e7-9084-d0c17942ba93
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/08/08/new-look-admits-product-could-better-disappointing-sales/
https://www.standard.co.uk/business/new-look-s-owner-crashes-to-a-loss-of-421-million-a3691626.html
http://www.cityam.com/266401/new-looks-bonds-slump-sales-disappoint
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/struggling-new-look-braced-for-debt-talks-5br6b6gzx
Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dump some sources
Talk:OPOS

message: Anyone know of any links to specifications for OPOS?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.11.48.96 (talk) 19:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can get the specifications from ARTS PeterCox (talk) 09:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was created in 2007 and used plagiarized content from http://web.archive.org/web/20040219110449/http://monroecs.com/oposbackground.htm. For monroecs.com's article was around in 2004, we know that the monroecs article existed before this article and it is was not monroecs who copied Wikipedia. I'm rewriting this article and deleting the copied content. Enikiniki6 (talk) 20:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting Article
Talk:Neurocrine Biosciences

message: the following text gets inserted and reverted:
 Neurocrine was founded by Larry Bock and Drs. Wylie Vale and Larry Steinman
46.138.95.18 (talk) 06:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  socked revert war? 
Talk:Neuberger Berman

message: Article states "Today the firm has approximately $130 billion in assets under management."  this needs date (and source).--68.173.2.68 (talk) 01:44, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: further to my comment above.   September 30, 2008's NYtimes dispatch (print edition) on the sale of neuberger states "$230 bill under management as of August 31[, 2008]." --68.173.2.68 (talk) 21:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  assets under management needs date 

message: I don't think anyone wants an edit war here, but to suggest that a seminal moment in the company's history, an IPO, doesn't merit inclusion in the article defies logic and smacks of NPOV violations.  If we exclude that period, why not exclude their entire history up to their separation from Lehman?  Clearly an editor here has an agenda to eliminate discussion of their IPO or management at the time or both, who knows.  AssetMgmtGuru (talk) 13:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Netto (Les Mousquetaires)

message: It's scandinavian for value!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.18.228 (talk) 17:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

message: If this Netto and Netto Marken-Discount are unrelated, why do have the same logo? --77.177.98.123 (talk) 09:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrelated yet same logo? 
Talk:Beatriz Pereira de Alvim

message: Beatriz Pereira de Alvim (1380–1415) was a Portuguese noblewoman, the only child of  Nuno Álvares Pereira and his wife Leonor de Alvim. vs  Three children were born to the union, two boys who died early in life, and a girl, Beatrice, who would eventually marry Afonso, first Duke of Bragança, son of King João I. (in Nuno Álvares Pereira)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.177.113.93 (talk) 17:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Nera (company)

message: I think this company has since merged with either Eltek, or Thrane & Thrane, but I'm not sure how to reference it.
[see here]
--Tomhannen 10:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ramacharitam

message: The sole source of the target-event is this article on a medieval poem, where I had already drafted all relevant information in a far detailed and contextual manner. For reasons (largely) unknown,  proposes to preserve the CFORK. (See this discussion.) TrangaBellam (talk) 15:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Varendra rebellion]] into [[Ramacharitam]]
Talk:Negra Modelo

message: This question was originally in the article:
:I can't add - but I'd like a question answered: is it true that only corn, no wheat is used - so that people with wheat allergies can drink it?
My guess is no - any beer that attempts to be "Munich-style" is probably going to use at least some barley, as a pure corn beer would taste very different.  Thetrick 23:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:NB Power

message: Seeing as this is a major news item I think a new page would be warranted. HalifaxRage (talk) 14:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree 100 per cent. There could be an abstract on this page, but not all of the events that occurred related to the proposed sale in 2009/10. JRT605 (talk) 12:29, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . OK, I've taken care of the split. The attempted merger is now covered in Proposed sale of NB Power. Bouchecl (talk) 18:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Sale of NB Power
Talk:Naza

message: I've removed the paragraph in the introduction regarding NAZA exploiting the AP's. Instead I've added it to a new section titled Critisms. Please do not re-insert the paragraph into the introduction without first discussing it here. --Pavithran 17:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Corrected

message: I've added information on the CKD models, Naza Automotive Manufacturing, Naza Kia Academy and beefed up the criticisms section which looked a bit too one-sided. More neutral now. Nickgomez 11:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CKD, NAM & NKA
Talk:Nauka (publisher)

message: The link for the Nauka home page is apparently dead. I could not log on as of 2016-07-23.
The link for the "English distributor" works but that page is in Russian.  Editor1023 (talk) 17:01, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled comment from July 2016 
Talk:Zong Lei

message: I found he is introduced as 宗磊 here
and. which is correct?
--Carl Daniels (talk) 11:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: his true name is 宗垒 or 宗磊?
Talk:National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research

message: As per Wikipedia guidelines, I'm declaring an interest. I've just expanded the entry and am letting you know that I work for NIWA as a science writer. I have abided by the 5 pillars of Wikipedia in editing this entry. In particular, I have stuck to factual information and have cited sources. YDdraig (talk) 06:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded by NIWA employee 
Talk:National Grid Wireless

message: This applies to the Arqiva article too, so please see my comment in Category talk:UK transmitter sites. Harumphy 15:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is your POV, isn't it?  ••Briantist•• talk 07:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

text: WP:9W ••Briantist•• talk 07:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

text: WP:PAPER WP:NOT#CENSOR ••Briantist•• talk 07:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can we please keep this discussion in Category talk:UK transmitter sites? That way, we don't have to do everything twice in Talk:Arqiva and Talk:National Grid Wireless. TIA. Harumphy 08:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's not the Wikipedia way, is it?  You seem to have your OWN RULES!!! ••Briantist•• talk 09:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable and non-notable transmitting stations
Talk:NCB Group

message: Not sure whether these should be merged or just cross-referenced, but there's mention in this article of the NCB Group in the Investec article, and it was taken over by Investec and rebranded in 2013. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Esmond, Illinois

message: So, maybe Esmond isn't incorporated but that doesn't change the fact that the U.S. Census Bureau did indeed once have the demographic information online. Just because it's not there now doesn't warrant wholesale deletion of information that I, myself saw online. That's the problem with the internet generation, if it's not online now, it never was, and cannot possibly be true. This wholesale deletion should be reverted. It's not a wonder why Wikipedia has only a small core of users who make significant contributions. Good work screwing this up. IvoShandor (talk) 01:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Wang Dong (footballer, born 1981)

message: The name Wang Dong comes under constant silly vandalism by those using IP addresses, several members have already and myself have undid these silly vandalism comments
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kai Lau (talk • contribs) 02:50, 23 October 2009
 because this is a request for page protection, and not a request to edit an already semi-protected page. I have copied your question across to there, see [Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Wang_Dong_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29 here]. Cheers,   Chzz  ►  06:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi protection request - october 23, 2009
Talk:Lee Resolution

message: Does anyone know what the numbers toward the bottom could possibly represent?  Also, has anyone noticed that Thomson was off by 20?  — MusicMaker5376 16:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to know that too!  Perhaps it is lost in history, never to be revealed.  Matt (talk) 09:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The (incorrect) sum

message: The document currently shown the article is probably the most important one: the resolution in the handwriting of Charles Thomson, with the voting checklist in the hand of John Hancock. There's another document we might want to add at some point: the original three resolutions in the handwriting of RH Lee, which he presented to Congress. It can be seen here. —Kevin Myers 10:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another image 

message: Is the image shown the entire document?  Or are there additional pages?  Elsquared (talk) 17:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  how many pages?