lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KGBT-TV

message: I expanded this article largely from what it was. All that really needs to be done is to include anchors.--Mcamargo 15:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 20:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: KGBT-TV no longer uses the logo on the article. Their new logo shows the CBS eye logo and the number 4, under the brand CBS 4. Please update the logo. Thank you. Mr. Slinks (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I’m still waiting for that logo. Can you please upload it. Thanks. Mr. Slinks (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo change
Talk:KGNC (AM)

message: I think it makes more sense for this to be divided into two different articles,one for KGNC AM and one for the FM, since they are essentially different stations —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.255.94.159 (talk) 16:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no consensus for a split, and 208.124.62.11 puts forward a good rationale for keeping as one article. There is one owner, Morris Communications, and it might be better to merge this article into Morris Communications. SilkTork *YES! 15:56, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two different Stations?
Talk:Craig Short

message: A nice article here, with plenty of information for expanding the article.—MDCollins (talk) 01:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  York Press article 
Talk:KKHH

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a Hindi romantic comedy film is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. - Dravecky (talk) 07:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose: It is common to refer to Bollywood movies with long names by their acronyms. If possible, the KKHH page should be made into a disambiguation page. I suggest not moving this article into KKHH. , so speaks rohith. 19:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:KHPT

message: I have combined the two pages as they are in full simulcast of one another. Mere seconds later, my work has been removed by user RA0808. If these two are not allowed a combination, then KTJM and KJOJ need separation as well. It makes no sense for one pair to be combined, and the other pair not.
What say you? Joe Polichino (talk) 20:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This station has its own distinct history, separate from KGLK. Just as the above mentioned articles were correctly split, as those station's histories are distinct, I have restored KHPT's article.--Tdl1060 (talk) 09:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combination of KGLK & KHPT
Talk:Craig Stadler

message: I'm surprised the towel incident is not listed; it was quite the controversy back in the day, and when the tree in question was diseased and had to come down years later, the course management allowed Stadler to wield the chainsaw, with the press on hand to photograph the event. Just a suggestion.73.97.219.201 (talk) 19:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Category talk:British Rail electric multiple units

message: I am struggling to understand why an editor repeatedly keeps removing inter-wiki links;  see , for example.  Can anyone explain this please? - David Biddulph (talk) 14:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because those inter-wiki links should be linked to :Category:Electric multiple units of Great Britain, created by that editor recently. — Michddastro (talk) 11:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of inter-wiki links
Talk:Craig T. Enoch

message: I'm going to leave this off of the article for now.  The article is a stub and the line would add undue weight to something that his son did.  We can't create in article about his son.  His son is simply not notable enough for one.  Sperril 13:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Son's child porn conviction

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 01:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Julio Borges

message: This article has unnecessary external link.--K4zem 17:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Craig T. Nelson

message: Back in the late 80s or early 90s, Nelson owned his own automobile racing team.  I cannot remember which organization he raced in.  I believe that was before American LeMans came into existance.  The car he owned was very much a predicessor of the current American LeMans prototype cars.  Johnnie O'Connell was Nelson's co-driver.  Perhaps there should be some mention of Nelson's auto racing career on his bigraphical page and perhaps some links to the American LeMans article, Johnnie O'Connell's article, and sports car racing articles in general.
SEdwardB 15:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says Jon Stewart "mocked" this statement, but he simply showed the video clip. The statement mocks itself ... and the person who said it, and the person he said it to, and all those who agree with it, and all those who have uttered similar sentiments. By saying what he did, Craig T. Nelson mocked the entire "Tea Party movement", far more effectively than any critic has.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.109.45.74 (talk) 08:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I changed the date that he started the club after watching the April 2, 1992 episode of the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson where Mr. Nelson explained that he just started the club.  Cdova (talk) 07:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screaming Eagles Racing 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Family Tree Productions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#Family Tree Productions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:33, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Family Tree Productions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I’m mr incredible and I’m so sorry to say it all is well I have no one who wants me too 82.23.136.194 (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  For: Mr Incredible 

message: The redirect Craig T. Nelson(character) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 06:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Craig T. Nelson(character)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Some sites give CTNs dob as 4.4.46...?? 87.75.115.50 (talk) 08:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born 1946??
Talk:An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought

message: * Added category Economic History today; presents other topics of a somewhat different version of 'economic history'. Include? Disinclude? Create more precise Wiki category? -- RayBirks 19:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 comment

message: Is there an online version available? There is for many of Rothbard's other texts. If so, perhaps a link from this page should be made. 213.37.192.62 (talk) 11:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online version available 
Talk:Craig Thompson

message: Does his cover for the Menomena record look a lot like S. Clay Wilson's stuff?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.96.86.10 (talk) 02:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is It Just Me Or...
Talk:Craig Victory

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 10:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:KLBK-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:KLIF (AM)

message: Call letters are not stations.  Call letters move all over the place and sometimes are hundreds of miles away from where the station that used to use them are located.  To refer to a station by frequency is correct.  KLIF is just the call sign and might or might not reflect a specific format.  KLIF was a music station in the 1970s.  AM 570 was originally KGKO of Wichita Falls and later it moved to Fort Worth.  KGKO was replaced by WFAA of Dallas and WBAP of Fort Worth for their time shared operation.
Martin Birnbach is still on KLIF. Why is he put under the former hosts section? I'm taking him off. http://klif.com/ONAIR/MartinBirnbach/tabid/257/Default.aspx (KingYaba (talk) 05:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:British Rail Class 502

message: Living at the time in Crossens, I spent much of my childhood travelling on these units, both going to Southport (prior to 1964) and then on to Liverpool. My memory may be playing tricks, but I'm pretty sure I used to see some 4 car units with two power cars and two intermediate trailers. Does my memory fail me on this? 
I also remember long extra trains of class 502 units bringing Orange men from Liverpool for their annual celebrations. This was before "the troubles" so none of us understood the signifiance. From memory these were 12 car trains coming from Liverpool to Southport.  Soarhead77 (talk) 09:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Were there any 4 car units?
Talk:British Rail Class 504

message: This article contains a lot of material that is not really relevant to the Class 504.  I intend to prune it. Possibly some of the material could be re-located to other pages. Biscuittin (talk) 22:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Biscuittin (talk) 10:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extraneous material 

message: Sources disagree on the number and horsepower of Class 504's traction motors. Quoted figures are shown in bold:
* Ian Allan ABC, 2 x 141 hp = 282 hp (210 kW)
* Platform 5 pocket book, 4 x 90 kW = 360 kW (483 hp)
* therailwaycentre.com, total 564 hp (421 kW) implies 4 x 141 hp
EMUs of the 1950s usually had about 250 hp per car so I'd expect around 500 hp for a 2-car set.  The figure of 282 hp looks far too low but either of the others looks possible. Biscuittin (talk) 08:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traction motors 

message: This statement seems extraordinarily tenuous and has no references cited. On what basis does the article state that MPs called for the Class 504s to be used to reinstate a rail service to Leigh? Jp4712 (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Pure original research as far as I can tell. Googling gives nothing to verify and the page Leigh (Greater Manchester) railway station doesn't mention it. I've removed it. Alzarian16 (talk) 16:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Leigh" proposal 

message: Some points which need clarification... Mirokado (talk) 16:05, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a link to British Rail coach designations. Biscuittin (talk) 19:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering, carriage descriptions
Talk:KLTY

message: There once was an article about Perri Reavis, but since it has been removed with a redirect to the KLTY page. Could somebody tell me what happened to that article? 70.247.112.218 (talk) 00:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Was redirected for lack of notability with this edit. You can find the last version here. Paradoctor (talk) 10:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perri Reavis 

message: Sentences that don't make any sense, sentences that go on forever, questionable informal phrases . . . this section needs to be rewritten. Sm5574 (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section is unreadable
Talk:Tommy Allsup

message: The claim Allsup pretends to be a 26 year old Australian in an attempt to fool the public is unsupported by the citations given.  The citations are simply links to the comedy program website and no reliable source is given to support the claim.  This a biography of a living person, all such contentions claims must be directly supported by a reliable source.  Zad68 16:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim Allsup pretends to be a 26 year old Australian in an attempt to fool the public is unsupported 
Talk:Craig Wright (playwright)

message: Cult following?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.32.73 (talk) 00:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:   cult following short lived TV show Dirty Sexy Money 
Talk:Shanti Project

message: I will attempt to email each of the Shanti Projects I was able to find to invite them to add relevant material to this article and expand it.
L. Greg 19:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Article Creation

message: This doctor does not exist. Can anyone prove he is alive? He has never given a single speech to anyone we know. Nothing. Nada. 0. He is the founder!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.60.98.146 (talk) 03:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Charles Garfield is a HOAX
Talk:Crazy Titch

message: Removed non-wiki related material.Zaq12wsx 14:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 

message: Should the picture be removed? It seems somewhat unsuitable Number9111 (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 11, 2006

message: As this is now protected, its too late for me to make these changes, but can whoever puts this on the Main Page make the following changes:
*FA Premier League is linked twice. Can Premier League be removed  from the opening sentence? - Manchester City are currently a Premier League team, but are not defined as one - putting it in the opening sentence is excessive.
*Second sentence - Starting with The football club seems clunky when the term football club is used in the preceding sentence. Can it be changed to Founded in 1880, the club have won the League Championship twice... or somesuch? Thanks. Oldelpaso 19:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for changes
Talk:KOKE (AM)

message: You may wish to verify the information displayed.
As of 11/17/2007 - it appears that KOKE AM 1600 in the Austin metroplex has switched to a Spanish Language format, only.
http://www.ontheradio.net/radiostations/kokeam.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.65.187 (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Longer An Air America Affiliate
Talk:KOSA-TV

message: The "Technology" and "Local Commitment" sections are clearly biased and are written like advertisements. --Bdj95 04:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased information
Talk:KPEZ

message: On May 31, 2010 KPEZ (102.3 FM) and KFMK (105.9 FM) swapped formats -- "The River" contemporary Christian moved to 105.9 FM while "The Beat" rhythmic contemporary moved to 102.3 FM. 76.27.192.32 (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: KPEZ and KFMK Swap Formats
Talk:KPFT

message: This page has a lot of information without a source/citation (particularly in the last section) and needs a clean-up.
Varchoel 13:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The piece states, "In the early morning hours on August 13, 2007, a bullet was fired into the studio, breaking a window and narrowly missing a woman's head. No one was injured. The shooting followed a week-long fundraising drive."  
This suggests that the gun was fired as a result of the fundraising drive. While the drives are an irritant to listeners, they don't usually generate gunshots. Should this be re-worded to remove the implication or was the gunshot a result of the drive? (the source link is dead, by he way)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.79.62.16 (talk) 15:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullets and Pledge Drives 

message: The article states that the station came on in March 1970 with the "new" song "Here Comes the Sun," from Abbey Road. This is a bit off; The Beatles' Abbey Road was released in late September/early October 1969. I'll make a slight change in the verbiage. Famspear (talk) 04:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here Comes the Sun 

message: KPFT: 
      Keep Putting Frogs Together
      Killing Poodles For Texas
      Keep Pitching For Tallers  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.72.181.157 (talk) 18:43, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Callsign Significance 

message: Today on the radio I heard them complain about Trump using the word lynching to describe impeachment, yet no comment on Joe Biden doing exactly the same when talking about Bill Clinton's impeachment. Either both are bad or neither is. InterdimensionalAliens (talk) 23:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political bias
Talk:KRBC-TV

message: The comments about the sports anchor are needless and border on vandalism.
Nsj 21:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Seems there should be a paragraph about KRBC radio, which was located in the same building for years.  1470am if memory serves me right.  Since they were twin operations, it should be included in any article, including the date it went off the air, etc.  As I don't live in Abilene anymore, the info is not as handy as it may be to someone still living there, so please pitch in.  Pharmboy 01:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  KRBC radio? 
Talk:Leon Best

message: As of "21:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong timestamp 
Talk:Cris Williamson

message: In the info box, Only Chris's birth year is listed. However, On this page on Rate Your Music (https://rateyourmusic.com/artist/cris_williamson), it says her birthday is 15 February 1947.
Should I add this to the info box and use that page as a source?
KaraLG84 (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, no. I've seen various help-type pages within WP that discuss birth dates, but this one for Biographies of Living People states clearly that exact birth dates should only be used when the information is widely published in reliable sources. I don't think the source you cite would be considered very reliable for this purpose. Maybe research her birth date in newspaper or magazine or other encyclopedia articles about her? NOLA1982 (talk) 21:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. I've not seen her birthday mentioned anywhere else as far as I can tell, so I'll just leave it as it is. KaraLG84 (talk) 23:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Williamson's birthday 

message: This intro paragraph sounds like a public relations release. Regardless of its accuracy, it sounds like a canned promo rather than an encylopedic treatment of the singer's overall importance, achievements, and influence. None of it is sourced. Any discussion? Hifrommike65 (talk) 05:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro overview  

message: Hi folks, started an Awards section with a good citation.  I will spend some time looking around for more sources so we can get rid of the tag!Realitylink (talk) 21:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for more references
Talk:Crispian Mills

message: :There should definitely be something in here about his actual faith; Mills himself is an ISKCON devotee. 
:It mentions the 'Sanksrit epics' of ancient India but never mentions his religious path. 212.9.115.132 (talk) 03:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section is way too long, and quite frankly a drag to read. Would someone care to shorten it down as I am not familiar with this man so don't feel I'd be up to the task.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icedragz (talk • contribs) 12:20, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youth and education