lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Drosera capensis

message: Can anyone fix the "edit sections" for the References, External links and Invasive species sections?
I do not know how to. 
—72.91.241.104 (talk)19:59, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'll take care of it. Rkitko (talk) 20:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone fix the "edit sections" 

message: Is it okay to add some flower pix of Drosera capenisis?  Maybe in place of "Drosera capenisis with prey"
—72.91.214.104 (Contribs|talk) 20:30, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think it's ok to replace that one since the leaf is shown in the first image. This is on my list of articles to expand anyway, so we'll be able to provide even more images soon when there's more text. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 18:54, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add pix? 

message: The very first opening sentence had 3 sources listed, this could easily be reduced to one single source. 
Source #3, is from a readers digest from 1992, this easily could be updated. 
D. capensis self-pollinates. Needed reference.  
"It does not require a terrarium although it can benefit from one." This statement needs a source, and potentially show some photos to discuss the effect of humidity on the mucilage production. 
There is a lot of descriptive details about the plant structure. Possibly add to this place with more sources, and make a clear section "structure".
The section "Invasive Species" is only listed with the fact it is one. Extend on the ways this plant may be classified as an invasive plant. 
In section "Reproduction" the author states that Cape Sundews are commonly referred to as a weed. Maybe this could get reworded into something more scientific. Such as the ability for the sundew to grow with such vigor and intensely multiply after every season makes this species hardy. 
More data should be gathered from the "Cultivation" section making it more detailed for those people growing the plant for recreation/hobby. It states some information about the climate they can live in, but nothing about the soil composition, pH level, and nutrient requirements. The section cultivation offers a single source for their findings, here it could be expanded on using multiple references.  
Overall this paper is brief and lacking in various up-to-date sources. The photos are clear and represent the descriptions well. The author does a good job at listing the types of cultured strains of capensis available commercially. More details about the invasive species list should be added, or delete the entire section and incorporate it into another section.
Brentbenedum (talk) 03:19, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Talk:Drosera rotundifolia

message: Cut:
:In the UK, it is a protected wild flower and therefore it is a criminal offence to remove all or part of one of these plants from the wild.
It isn't listed as so on the uk govenment web site. see http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-1816  Zeimusu | Talk page 21:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carborane

message: This article is seriously out of date. It deals only with 12-vertex species. See, for example,  "Carboranes" by Russel Grimes. Petergans (talk) 09:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more work 

message: The given equation for the formation of the "dianion" () section Dicarbollide) is wrong, as it actually represents the formation of the monoanion. The dianion is obtained in a second stept by deprotonation using hydrides, e.q. KH:
:KC2B9H12 + KH → H2 + K2C2B9H11
:.Thank you for reporting this problem.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Equation
Talk:Eduard Kuznetsov (dissident)

message: He tried to hijack a plane and that eventually 'opened the doors of emigration to thousands of Soviet Jews'? Oh really? How about it gave KGB a good pretext to clamp down on all Jewish activities in Russia? Besides hijacking a plane is a criminal act no matter the reasons in any country. The article in its present form makes him look like a hero.
: Please point out where we stray away from WP:NPOV. 
: On your other points: The participants were accused in high treason, which is a political and not a criminal charge. And the KGB was rather famous for creating pretexts when they needed. ←Humus sapiens ну? 06:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK, it is the most widespread spelling. ←Humus sapiens ну? 06:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Sarracenia purpurea

message: Re-added the Category:Flora of Newfoundland and Labrador;  this is the provincial flower of the province so it should at least show up in the associated category page.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 02:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: Is the article's main photo correct? Could someone confirm? I am a bit sceptical.--Spike the Dingo (talk) 01:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is of the correct species. The location data is presented on the image description page, so that's likely correct unless the uploader lies. Any specific reason for your skepticism? Did you notice something I haven't? Rkitko (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. The flower is at a funny angle. Thank you. --Spike the Dingo (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Should anyone care to expand this article at some point, here is a paper about nitrogen uptake in this species:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0006164
DJLayton4 (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref for Nitrogen Uptake

message: Can someone say something about how big it gets and how fast it grows. Also, there's nothing about its flowers or reproduction. Nothing covers its soil, sun, and water requirements.
Perhaps Spike the Dingo, didn't like the main picture because the plant looks like it is in an environment more suited to a cactus or succulent. (It certainly doesn't look boggy to me.)
Gatorgirl7563 (talk) 12:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Barry Rice's FAQ is a fine source of info. Be bold and edit the article yourself, adding sources as you go along. Let me know if you have any questions or run into any trouble. I don't have the time right now to dedicate myself to expansion of this article. One note, though, is that you should avoid how-to guide-like information on soil, sun, and water requirements. It's fine to include descriptive info on cultivation, but Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 14:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few suggestions 

message: Hi  This edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sarracenia_purpurea&diff=1009798949&oldid=1004695988) adding the "Floral Emblems of Canada" is interesting and does belong here but... it's not made in the usual way. See the "e" in the corner there? You're supposed to put all that stuff in there, so it's a separate navbox. So then you can put that into this page and however many others. Like :Template:Palm oil. Invasive Spices (talk) 16:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , okay, I've copy-pasted the text into the "e" section. Thank you for explaining this to me~ Safyrr (talk) 23:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

text: *You're welcome. Looks good. Invasive Spices (talk) 16:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Navbox creation
Talk:Nepenthes infauna

message: there is a considerable amount of information regarding this topic in Nepenthes rajah, which should probably be copied/moved here. --Sarefo 00:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Mgiganteus1 00:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  more info 

message: I added the DOI, then noticed it is actually a dead link. However, I suppose this is a temporary problem with SpringerLink, so I'm leaving it in for now. --Sarefo 04:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DOI
Talk:List of carnivorous plants

message: Why even include "Paleoaldrovanda" as anything other than a footnote if it has turned out to just be insect eggs? Not to mention many of the "genera" that exist solely due to pollen grain fossils? Must be the only one who thinks those are totally speculative and ridiculous to include on an encyclopedia. Case in point being Paleoaldrovanda, I'm sure it isn't even close to the only instance of a gross misnaming and classification. And naming genera and species based on slight pollen grain differences, seriously taxonomists? 
That said, these are carnivores so I'm sure any other opinions would be along the lines of "everything is a separate species, always!!!"... (Not intended to "troll", just that few other loose groupings of plants get even close to the level of scrutiny that these do, to the point that its probably pretty difficult to justify at this point in time.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:200:B69E:F17B:9F02:73CC:C140 (talk) 03:34, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The list needs formatting as per the standards for scientific names:
#The authorities should be in smaller font
#As these are names under the ICNafp, the date should be omitted.
Peter coxhead (talk) 09:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting
Talk:Capsella bursa-pastoris

message: copied from commons :
*Shepherd's purse can be found in flower from early spring through early winter. Each flower develops into a heart-shaped, two-celled seedpod, about 5 mm long, containing a number of tiny seeds. When the pod dries, it splits in half, releasing the mature seeds. People have been eating this plant for thousands of years and it is presently cultivated in a number of eastern countries. Shepherd's purse is one of the earliest wild greens in the spring. In the early spring, before the flowerstalks appear, the leaves are good in salads or cooked as greens. When the plant flowers, the larger basal leaves tend to die off, leaving only the smaller leaves clasping the stem. They're still edible, but they get tougher, develop more flavor, and become labor-intensive to collect.
-- Schusch 09:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, sounds great. But if I were including it, I'd want an original source to reference, not the commons. Aware of where this text was paraphrased from? Thanks! --Rkitko 15:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Kingdon, I concede "temperate" may be too narrow a description of its distribution, but how does "colder
climates" help when you also point out that the distribution extends into subtropical areas?  Anyway what does colder mean? Colder than what? Plantsurfer (talk) 19:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Flora of Pakistan source says "Distribution: Cosmopolitan in cooler climates mostly."  Part of why I am reluctant to deviate from slight variants on this wording is that I don't really know enough about its distribution to know exactly what to say.  You can see a US/Canada range map at PLANTS.  Maybe something like "most climates" or "many climates" would be accurate.  As the second-most common weed in the world (according to one of the sources, although I was reluctant to be quite that specific), the range seems to be pretty broad. Kingdon (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The new atlas of the British flora defines its range as Circumpolar wide temperate(see article for reference).
Aksoy (see article for ref) states that Capsella bursa-pastoris occurs in cool temperate zones (oceanic\ suboceanic\ subcontinental and humid steppe climates) and in warm temperature subtropical zones (dry-summer Mediterrannean climates with humid winters and dry-summer steppe climates with humid winters)Plantsurfer (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: colder climates
Talk:Cosa Nostra

message: This page is copied verbatim from the La Cosa Nostra page, but I cannot tell if this is permitted use, the WP copyrights page lists US governmental photographs as being public domain, but I cannot find a reference for text being public domain. Before I tag this as copyright infringement, can anyone confirm this article's © status?
--kylet 10:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's written by an FBI employee, it's a Work of the United States Government, and thus PD, but a cursory glance didn't tell me who wrote it. Mikkel 18:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: FBI site
Talk:Altbier

message: Last time I was in Düsseldorf (I guess it was 13 years ago), I could swear that in addition to the ubiquitous Diebels Alt, another popular altbier was called Düssel Alt. This article makes no mention of it, and it's hard to find sources because there are so many beers with the same name brewed outside of Germany, although I found this one that mentions it.
I'll add that my wife, who generally doesn't like beer, liked this one. It's really good. And the locals consider it "medicinal": whatever's ailing you, a glass of Düssel Alt should make it better. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Düssel Alt was brewed by Hirschbrauerei AG. Hirschbrauerei closed 1974. Düssel Alt was produced by various breweries in the area, it disappeared from the market around 2010. Lberges (talk) 20:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete list of brands
Template talk:Nepenthes

message: This otherwise nice template does not scale well. I tried it with opera and firefox, and with both the font breaks out of the right border when the page is zoomed in. I changed the absolute 600px width to 40 em, this solves the problem for my browsers. Don't know about MS exploiter, though. --Sarefo 04:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: hm, very strange. although the template scaled nicely when trying it out in a sandbox, it was flowing over in its 'natural habitat' (Nepenthes pages). I enlarged the width to 48em, but have no idea what causes this double behavior. --Sarefo 05:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: scaling issue

message: I've just reverted the insertion of large number of the html  into this template. A list is not a piece of prose broken up by line breaks as anyone using a screen reader will tell you. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility #Lists clearly states "Do not separate list items with line breaks (). Use one of the following methods ... Unbulleted lists ... Horizontal lists" --RexxS (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and there is also the issue of wp:deviations in the MOS which says to eschew all that raw html in favour of normal wiki-syntax. Anything with center and font tags is ripe for refactoring, anyway. I took things further, too; and the other way, too, by adding style=width:auto; which restores the width-per-content look that the prior implementation had. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 21:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  looks good.  the massive div/br version had text overflowing outside of the box on my browser.  this version looks good. Frietjes (talk) 21:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Much better, but we still have what is logically a single list broken up into multiple lists, solely for the purpose of creating arbitrary columns for visual presentation. Can we not avoid this? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists vs prose
Talk:François Bernier's first defined race

message: Please note that François Bernier's "A New Division of the Earth"  is not a book [] but an article in "Journal des Savans" roughly the size of his many letters on many different subjects to his "amateur" friends. It is very problematical to call him a racial scientist on that basis. See also the general status of "science" in his day and age.
I thank you to consider this before merging your idea into the article. (84.193.163.31 11:00, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the content in this article is valid, surely it should be merged with the main article. If it isn't, it should be deleted. No? --Lukobe 23:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Why do you say that? I try to assume good faith as much as possible. Frankly, François Bernier isn't that interesting to me at all, and the only reason my attention was drawn to this page was because Dark Tichondrias created it. I don't think a separate article was ever necessary and I'd like to see it merged or deleted. --Lukobe 17:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Be Carefull
Talk:NOT gate

message: This shouldn't be a separate article. Fresheneesz 11:06, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why?  I disagree.  p agree that in its present state it probably should not be (there currently isn't much information that the logic gate article doesn't give), but it definitely has the potential to be a valid article.  There is definite confusion about what a not gate is (see the talk page on logic gate) and with its own page, a section on different implementations could take place, something that couldn't happen in the logic gate article. Epachamo 22:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats a good argument, my main reason for posting that ^, is that AND gate and NOR gate and NAND gate don't have their own pages. They probably should, especially nor and nand. I agree with you, but the others deserve their place more than NOT does. Fresheneesz 07:30, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree with that.  I don't have time right now to make the other gates(Its finals week), but if you give me a week, I can make them.  If you want to before that would be great Epachamo 16:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

text: That would be great, I probably won't have time to get to that. I'll definately edit and add to your work if I can. Fresheneesz 09:05, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with logic gate

message: These articles have the same goal and cover the same device they should be merged. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.44.85.194 (talk) 04:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Inverter (logic gate)
Talk:Irish Snap

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Doc ask? 11:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: What does this page need to get people to stop adding template stuff to it. Is it likly that there will be an expert on this game. If an expert is just someone who has played it a lot, then you might as well call me an expert on it. And ive added everything i think needs to be. What more needs to be done? and i dont think many refrences are going to be found.Caspar 19:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about details about who invented it, where/when was it first played.  Are the rules published in a book anywhere?  An article about a game should include those details, not just one set of rules.  You might be wrong about references, that's why I tagged it for assistance from an expert.  Peace.TheRingess 20:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this page need?
Talk:Russell Floyd

message: Huh? Russell Floyd born in Albert Square? Lol, Albert Square isn't real, it's a fictional place. Unless Russell Floyd is born in an Albert Square in London, but it shouldn't take you to the fictional one.
* I didn't notice that before - looks like someone's idea of a joke. Fixed. --Kurt Shaped Box 19:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sidearm (weapon)

message: *Merge - same topic but using different name SirIsaacBrock 11:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone suggested merging this with handgun?  Against such a future merger. Mathiastck 16:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: To Sidearm (weapon) and move the current Sidearm article to Sidearm (baseball). --Phil1988 (talk) 23:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 
Talk:County of London Plan

message: I bought a copy of this the other day. It is unclear if it is Crown Copyright or not. If it is it has expired and we can use all of it, which is really nice as there are lots of good maps etc. Justinc 11:45, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Sfan00 IMG/Archive 10#County of London Plan 1943 book over we may be able to use the contents too. Do you still have access to the book? (If it's already on Commons somewhere, I didn't spot anything obvious during the very quick look I had just now) -- Trevj (talk) 23:02, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I haven't seen my copy for a bit but I will dig around and check; I could have lent it to someone, I hope not. Justinc (talk) 11:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it was quite some time ago! -- Trevj (talk) 13:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Indeed. But I have found it again. Justinc (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:Gracie Films

message: Is this a page about Gracie Films or the Gracie Films logo???
Sorry but it looks a bit amateurish, written by Simpsons fans that haven't bothered to learn anything about the company except for what you see in that series. Tilgrieog 11:47, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've just edited that section to add the episode title where Homer cries where the credits ran. I have not edited the Snake reference because I'm not completely sure it refers to the Paint Your Wagon parody episode.
Sorry about my poor English. --83.34.127.114 18:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpsons music variations
Talk:John Batiste

message: This guy is certainly notable for being one of the six Generals to speak out against Donald Rumsfeld. At the very least, this should see an AfD vote. But it's nowhere near CSD A7. Harro5 11:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: please read (R) Gen. Eric Shinseki's biography. --El Ingenioso Hidalgo Don Qvixote De La Mancha 23:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Once supported Rumsfeld?

message: This would seem fairly important:
. DJ CreamityOh Yeah! 20:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Batiste no longer invovled with Vote Vets
Talk:HQ (album)

message: A couple of things I'm a bit unsure about with this album:
*Release date
*Recording date(s)
Can't find any information on the web about these details. TomiG 12:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The DJ John Peel asked his producer John Walters to play When An Old Cricketer Leaves The Crease in the event of his death. Walters, however, died first in 2001 so Peel used it on his show. Andy Kershaw did the same as a tribute when Peel passed away in 2004. 91.125.26.115 (talk) 12:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Peel
Talk:Ȥ

message: In Unicode this letter is called U+0224 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH HOOK, and can be seen here.  There must be a wikipedian convention for displaying such a character in an article often viewed by browsers not configured to do so.  
I noticed that this article doesn't even try, using Ȥ instead of Ȥ at the beginning of the article.  66.167.139.8 12:07, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital Z with hook 

message: I have no idea what this character was originally intended for, but nobody seems to be using it for Middle High German (the geschwänztes z looks rather different than a "z with hook"). (technical discussion in German ). dab (𒁳) 12:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: People use the Ezh (Ʒ ʒ) instead, which (officially) is an IPA character. This is how this character (Z mit Unterschlinge) should look like, because Ezh is a straigth up copy of it (to make it easier to print books with phonetic transcriptions). But instead the unicode consortium just came up with some bullshit that doesn't look like the character it's supposed to represent at all. It's like they had some kind of chip on their shoulder against german.. They also maintain that blackletter is just a font, not a script, which would be fine if they at least provided codepoints for the additional charaters that demonstrably exists in many blackletters. But they don't. Eeeeeeeexcept for the characters that were used in non-german blackletter of course, which get their own codepoint, like R_rotunda, which never even represented a phonetic difference. It's super weird. 2A02:1205:C692:C420:2B49:B612:3A58:7F12 (talk) 10:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle High German