Talk:British Rail Class 319

message: I have submitted and uploaded some interior photographs of Class 319 which show up the pattern of the seat moquette more clearly. Also my shot of the Class 319/4 at East Croydon was taken on a day with blue sky and the tall buildings compliment the First Capital Connect livery well.
PeterSkuce (talk) 10:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy with that, sounds good. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!)  22:13, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Definition/Resolution Photographs 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class 319. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150421071217/http://www.porterbrook.co.uk/downloads/brochures/319%20Brochure.pdf to https://www.porterbrook.co.uk/downloads/brochures/319%20Brochure.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131215051219/http://www.porterbrook.com/downloads/brochures/319%20Brochure.pdf to http://www.porterbrook.com/downloads/brochures/319%20Brochure.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems OK Dr Sludge (talk) 07:43, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is about a page's worth of low quality fan art in this article.  I really don't care who drew it, but I propose it adds little to the article and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons.  Here it is for your reference: Tony May (talk) 16:07, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure - but this is a encyclopaedia, not a "fan site". I personally like the liveries, but SEVENTEEN of them is far too many. I've cut them down to just the major changes - excluding minor logo changes and "interim" liveries etc. Turini2 (talk) 09:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Do they need to be so big? We don't all have widescreen monitors. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also a fair point! Turini2 (talk) 08:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan art in this article 

message: In the article it says, "They were also the first British Rail units to use modern thyristor control in place of a camshaft and resistor bank". I believe this is incorrect, shouldn't that accolade go to the class 317s? Waihonlam1994 (talk) 00:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure that classes 313, 314 and 315 had thyristor control, and they all pre-date class 317. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that 313s use camshaft controllers, but 314s, 315s, and indeed 317s employed thyristors. XAM2175 (T) 11:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thyristor 

message: Lets put an end to this edit waring shall we?I've told you three times that the Twitter account you keep citing is unreliable so please stop adding it.A reliable source does not have to a big social media site like Twitter (or X as its now called), a local newspaper/local news website from the area where the LNR 319s operate saying the LNR 319s have been withdrawn will be enough. Maurice Oly (talk) 13:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the official LNR website as well to the reference. DavidTDC3377 💬 Talk 16:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically the twitter account is reliable because it is owned by the real LNR and links on LNR point to the twitter account? DavidTDC3377 💬 Talk 17:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Read WP:RSPTWITTER, without the tick pre-musk takeover the account is not reliable as you can't prove the account belongs to LNR.The account linking to the LNR website means nothing anybody can link to that website on their Twitter profile. Maurice Oly (talk) 19:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

text: While the LNR website is a reliable source, the website says the 319s will be retired not that the 319s have been retired.So until the LNR website says the 319s have been retired it can't be used as a source to say the LNR 319s have been retired. Maurice Oly (talk) 20:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring