lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dhubri district

message: This user: 2409:4065:388:661E:DEF4:CA12:8258:AD10 and some other addresses of him is adding false info on Assam's language percentage that's not supported by 2011 census. Msasag (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This person is adding language data in different district articles of Assam. He excludes other included languages from other languages except for Bengali (where Rajbansi, Hajong and Chakma are included). Not just that, he increases Bengali number even more than the census data and decreases that of others. His edits need to be calculated and corrected, or we have to remove those edits because language percentage data isn't so important. Shows some kind of competition. And he is doing this using different IP addresses. You can such his edits by searching districts, he's doing this to districts that have large number of "Bengali" speakers. Msasag (talk) 02:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  False information
Talk:Kamrup district

message: Hi Wikipedian,
Could someone confirm the district name, if it was renamed to "Kamrup Rural district" officially. So i could move the page to correct name. Possibly someone natively.
- -   Jor langneh (Talk) 13:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  District name clarification
Talk:Dibrugarh district

message: Found http://www.raijmr.com/ijre/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/IJRE_2016_vol05_issue_05_01.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 09:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  thesis about education in the district  

message: If Dibrugarh was a part of the Ahom kingdom in the late 14th century, then the Ahom kingdom is not so small.  Also, the Ahoms and the Mongkwang exchanged annual gifts which does not mean they are under the Mongkhwang.  Chaipau (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Goalpara district

message: Please add goalpariya dialect to the languages list Truthfulsoldier (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is considered to be a dialect of Assamese language, as per govt census 2011. So not mentioned separately in the census source, thus can't add it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goalpariya dialect
Talk:Bishnupur district

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition 
Talk:Bilaspur district, Chhattisgarh

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Janjgir–Champa district

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: The article says "There are fifteen R.I. mandals..."    What does R.I stand for? RJFJR (talk) 00:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandals
Talk:Jashpur district

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Chandel district

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition 
Talk:Imphal East district

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition
Talk:Korba district

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Senapati district

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition
Talk:Koriya district

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: District website says Korea, no indication of Koriya's use officially.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrocat84 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Koriya the official name of the district?
Talk:Raigarh district

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Tamenglong district

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition 
Talk:Raipur district

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Rajnandgaon district

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Thoubal district

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition
Talk:Ukhrul district

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition
Talk:Imphal West district

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition
Talk:Dimapur district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition 

message: . Other sources most likely. --Maasikaru (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio 
Talk:Kohima district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition 

message: . Other sources most likely. --Maasikaru (talk) 05:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio 
Talk:Mokokchung district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition 

message: Hello. Are the six mountain ranges listed in this article not part of the much larger Patkai range? 
I am working on a more coherent organization of the geography of the Indian-Burmese region. Cheers.
RhinoMind (talk) 15:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of the Patkai range? 
Talk:Doda district

message: The article had a statement that an IP editor tried to change (with respect of the rural development blocks:
:There are eight Rural Development Blocks comprising Bhaderwah, Ghat (Doda), Thathri, Gandoh (Bhalessa), Bhagwah, Assar,  Marmat and Gundana. The number of Panchyats is 232.
Unfortunately the citation is just to a the district home page, and does not support the statement.  So I have moved it from the article to here.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rural development blocks
Talk:Mon district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition 
Talk:Jammu district

message: what is the regligious division of Jammu District? Can someone give a comparison of pre-partition and after partition in religious population? 103.122.159.198 (talk) 07:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See 1947 Jammu massacres. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious Population
Talk:Phek district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition
Talk:Tuensang district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition
Talk:Pulwama district

message: Finally the pulwama has got a title of city but do you think it has a infrastructure that can met the demands of town Mohammad zehran (talk) 08:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulwama -city 

message: There are some contradictory data on the area of the district:
*
**Reporting area = 0.61 lac hectares.  A lac = 100,000.  So reporting area = 61,000 hectares (610 sq km).
*
**Reporting area = 60,772 sq km
One of these has clearly got hectares confused with square kilometres.  This kind of error is inherent in the metric system.
This map appears to show the district boundary - it is about 48 km long and 20 km wide.  If it were a rectangle it would be 960 sq km - it is actually less than that.  So an area of 610 sq km is possible.  It looks like the Demography page says "sq km" when it means "ha".  (It was so much easier when they used miles.)-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:21, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The reporting area is the area for which data on land use classification are available.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area
Talk:Wokha district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition
Talk:Zünheboto district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition 

message: 
:Since the article has a photo now, I have disabled the  tag. If there are additional/better images needed, feel free to undo my actions. Avicennasis @ 06:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disabled reqphoto tag
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Catholic Alliance of wikipedia

message: The keep votes so far:
#Chooserr - asked to do so by Shanedidona
#Hollow Wilerding - asked to do so by Shanedidona
#Dominick - asked to do so by Shanedidona
#Glenncando - asked to do so by 65.188.159.140
#Maltesedog - asked to do so by Shanedidona
#Avalon - asked to do so by Shanedidona
#Activision45 - asked to do so by Shanedidona
#Pitchka - received no notice of this mfd
Aecis Mr. Mojo risin' 12:37, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the pattern is obvious here.  Wikipedia is not a place that should have factions like this, that require recruitment of members after the group is set up. Deckiller 13:09, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Edict of Gülhane

message: For some reason I really doubt the original title was "Hatt-i Sharif of Gulhane", the word "of" doesn't exist in Ottoman Turkish as far as I know. Mustaqbal 12:39, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hatt-i Sharif of Gulhane

message: There seems to be conflicting information in this article vs the article on Mustafa Reşid Pasha.  This article says that the edict was issued in 1839 'at the behest of reformist Grand Vizier Mustafa Reşid Pasha.'    However the article on Mustafa Reşid Pasha says that he was first appointed Grand Vizier in 1846.  Prior to that time he was variously Ambassador to England, France and minister for foreign affairs.  I don't know which article is correct but obviously they both can't be.  I'm guessing that Mustafa Reşid Pasha was indeed the principal architect of the edict, but that he was not the Grand Vizier at the time the edict was issued. DlronW (talk) 22:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information
Talk:Crotch

message: Dubious tag added in relation to statement that crutch is equivalent to crotch; Thesaurus.com does not list crotch and crutch as related from either end, nor does cambridge english dictionary. Personal, never seen in usage. Confirmation?
Spookerton (talk) 10:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merriam-Webster lists as the third definition of crutch: the crotch of a human being or animal.  I think that clears up the dubiousness. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: *Microsoft Sam translates "crotch" into "crow's nest". When using LH Michael or LH Michelle it is said properly.
-- KaiAdin 00:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Brancusi torso sculptures seem to include the crotch. Bus stop (talk) 02:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Constantin Brâncuși]]
Talk:Uniscribe

message: Anyone know if the section about the licensing agreement is true?  Kurt Weber 12:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licensing 

message: I just extracted the usp10.dll from the SIL FieldWorks installation file and it says it's Uniscribe version 1.471.4063.0 rather than 1.626.6001.18000
--Sven Siegmund (talk) 13:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniscribe version in SIL FieldWorks 

message: See MS KB article 827763 (Workaround section). File version unknown.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.92.181.11 (talk) 10:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  USP10.DLL included in the Windows Installer 2.0 Redistributable for Windows 95, 98, and Me package 

message: Does anybody know whether USP10.DLL contains a table-driven normalization algorithm, for example NFC ?
For example, composing Vietnamese characters and the following tone mark BEFORE giving them to the font?
This information is missing in the article.
[ User Tedu, de-wiki ]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.138.39.60 (talk) 15:39, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  USP10.DLL and Unicode NFC "Normalization Form Canonical Composition" 

message: I am puzzled by the remark in the "New feature of this version" columm for version 1.626.7600.20602 "This version supports OpenType on Windows XP" since earlier versions also supported OpenType and worked on Windows XP. 06:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenType support 

message: Where does this belong?  The USE itself is also implemented in DirectWrite (apparently its earlier Windows home), and (modified) clones exist in HarfBuzz and AAT.  In a way it belongs in Complex_text_layout, where it can, alas, be a fine example of ignorant Microsoft engineers 'knowing best'.  (The generic rules implemented break down in some cases.)  It could also belong in OpenType#Extended_language_support.  I think it should be somewhere that allows discussion of its clones. --RichardW57m (talk) 12:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Universal Shaping Engine
Talk:Ada, Countess of Holland

message: the "c" in "countess" should be capitalised. e.g. Margaret, Countess of Holland
203.214.112.124 13:02, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! --Lox (t,c) 16:25, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to [[Ada, Countess of Holland]]
Talk:Ovarian cancer

message: I propose merging MALOVA into the Research section of Ovarian cancer. The MALOVA study's article is currently an orphan and a stub, and I think if it were expanded properly it would fit best within the context of other research on ovarian cancer. Uffda608 (talk) 10:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 08:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Charles Wright (cricketer)

message: He could not be the second person because there are atleast two previous instances :
1. MCC v Kent 1857
2. Smokers v Non smoekers 1886-7
I don't have a reference book, so don't know whether there are any others. Tintin 13:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I shouldn't have believed his Cricinfo page! Per the 2003 Wisden, Wright was the fourth. George "Farmer" Bennett was the second (Kent v Sussex 1872. I'll change the article, jguk 17:31, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

text: By the way, good spot, Sreeram! jguk 17:39, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Err... I knew it off the top of the head because I made a similar error about Scotton in the Smokers v Non smokers (but I did confess that I was not sure!) and User:Loganberry corrected it Tintin 17:45, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handled the ball
Talk:History of New Jersey/to do

message: *Article is now at 47kb. Remove minor details to sub-pages and keep thoroughness while making article concise... see Wikipedia:Summary style.
*Identify and fill any holes
**Nineteenth Century coverage is thin, especially from 1865 onwards.
***I found a time line here, which, for the later Nineteenth Century, focuses on Thomas Edison and his inventions. As of now, since there wasn't much going on in New Jersey at the time, I think we should leave it alone until something can be established about the time period.
***Address "Boroughitis" brought on by 1894 change to borough management law.  Any area could form a municipality by a majority vote of the residents in the area.  Some into at Talk:Harrington Township, Bergen County, New Jersey (Historical). 
****See Boroughitis, for my stab at starting the article. In Bergen County alone, 26 municipalities were created in 1894. Today, 56 of Bergen County's 70 municipalities are Boroughs. Alansohn 15:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Storvätteshågna

message: Could someone please move this article to Storvatteshagna, without diacritics? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaker (talk • contribs) 
:There is no reason to do so, but I made a redirect from there. u p p l a n d 09:01, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks! Aaker 091:05, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Archbishop Carney Regional Secondary School

message: Greetings editors!
Before editing this article, please consider reading WP:SCH#WNTI, which is part of the project page for the Wikischools Project.  Specifically, it outlines what does not belong in an article about a school.
Keep in mind:  this is an encyclopedia, not the school webpage.  Doing this should help to avoid having edits deleted in the future.
Happy editing! LonelyBeacon (talk) 02:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What Not To Include