Talk:Cycle Collstrop

message: I really don't think Unibet has made it into the ProTour yet. See this article: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=features/2006/protour_licence_final, which was written on November 25, 2006.
:They aren't. I'll edit that out.--BGBkstroke 11:35, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in the ProTour yet. 

message: Agree - it's the same team.  One of these entries should be a redirect. kju 12:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Make the Team Unibet one a redirect. I think this one is a little better written and better organized, and the name "Unibet.com Cycling Team" is the correct name. --BGBkstroke 14:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There may be some material to include from the Fight for 2006 Pro Tour licence section of Unibet.com but it needs referencing. The rest is already better detailed on this page. Mk3severo 16:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Discussion

message: Can somebody who knows what's going on please explain this anti-gambling regulation that keeps them from riding in some countries and how this will affect their season?  I'm confused. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.170.128.66 (talk) 14:53, May 23, 2007
:I think the controversy between the team and the Grand Tour organisers should also be added to the article. I wish someone will help expand it. Celticshk Talk 09:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote a bit - incomplete and unreferenced (as I don't know how to do references). Shouldn't be hard to find references. Feel free to expand, I might get back on it later. -- Danilot 10:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somebody Please Explain 

message: :Image:Unibet cycling team training.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Unibet cycling team training.jpg

message: Unibet are quite a big online bookmakers. The fact that the cycling team no longer exists shouldn't mean that Unibet.com transfers to Cycle Collstrop. Unibet are now too big. They should be demerged, a new page should be created for Unibet/Unibet.com (same page) and that page will just be about the bookmakers, with a note at the top saying, "For information about the cycling team, see Cycle_Collstrop page" or something like that.   I came to the Unibet.com wikipedia page because I wanted to find out about Valencia CF's new shirt sponsors, and I got taken to this cycling page! --Tris2000 (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unibet bookies should have own page