lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A German Requiem (Brahms)

message: Per WP:NOT#LYRICS and WP:MOSMUSIC#LYRICS, I am removing the source text and translation, as they do not seem to fit the guidelines for usage of source text. I am copying the table over here, however, if anybody would like to move the source text ot Wikisource, which is likely where it belongs. Brambleclawx 15:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree that the placement of the German and English text in this article contradicts the guidelines you mention in any way. The removal of the table above left the article with an ugly and pointless and unencyclopedic playlist. Im accordance with widespread Wikipedia practice, it should be reinstated. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, of course it should go back: readers should not have to go to the talk page or edit history to find information they're looking for! Sparafucil (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: This article fails to even mention the often discussed fact that Brahms was quite familiar with, indeed had made a study of, Heinrich Schütz's 1636 Musicalisches Exequien; Concert in Form einer teutschen begräbnis-Missa. The influence of Schütz, in the declamation and textures, despite more than 200 years of stylistic change, is fairly obvious, and deserves some analysis.  
Oldionus (talk) 17:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some discussion of the influence of Schütz would help
Talk:Solebury Township, Pennsylvania

message: Just so you know, I talked to a representative from the Township, and they said Solebury has a land area 26.68 square miles. I don't have an account and don't want to have my IP address recorded publicly, but I just wanted to let someone know so they could change it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.83.174.29 (talk) 16:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passing By 

message: I've added a Cleanup tag suggesting the entire article be re-written. Despite the Good Faith efforts of several editors, the following issues justify this. For guidelines in improving the article, see WP:Editing Policy and Wikipedia:Writing Better Articles. Also click the links below for information on the issues indicated:
* Incomplete lead section: WP:Lead Section
* Lack of citations: WP:Verifiability, WP:Citation Templates
* Subjective editorial viewpoint: WP:Neutral Point of View
* Lack of wikilinks: WP:Wikilink
The Geography and Demographics sections appear to be in good shape, though there should be more on where Solebury is in relation to the surrounding areas. Allreet (talk) 04:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: Body of Dean Finocchiaro, one of four missing men found buried in Solebury.4 Missing Men: The Solebury Farm Mystery Timeline[http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/07/13/537008395/police-identify-1-of-4-missing-men-in-common-grave-in-rural-pennsylvania Police Identify 1 Of 4 Missing Men In Common Grave In Rural Pennsylvania. NPR.org 
July 13, 2017, 10:51 AM ET] MaynardClark (talk) 21:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: News

message: @Lavalizard101 , I am confused as to why coverage on the July 2017 Pennsylvania murders is considered a breakage of WP:NOTNEWS. Could you explain?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NHS43 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing 2017 news story with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper WP:NOTNEWS]
Category talk:Estimation theory

message: :Please add comments in the Move discussion section not in the Reasons or Votes sections. Sign and date all comments, using the Wikipedia special form "~~~~", which translates into a signature and a time stamp automatically.
===Reasons===
"Estimation" can mean many things, and this category (as the contents stand) is primarily about estimation theory (a branch of statistics) and not the other forms of estimation.
At some point, I intend on merging the relevant content from estimation to my recently creation estimation theory. Cburnett 20:51, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please number, sign and date votes with: #~~~~ 
====Support====
# Cburnett 20:51, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Straw poll on the move of [[:Category:Estimation]] to [[:Category:Estimation theory]]

message: "Estimation" can mean many things, and this category (as the contents stand) is primarily about estimation theory (a branch of statistics) and not the other forms of estimation.
At some point, I intend on merging the relevant content from estimation to my recently creation estimation theory. Cburnett 20:51, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons

message: :Please number, sign and date votes with: #~~~~ 
====Support====
# Cburnett 20:51, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: # Cburnett 20:51, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: Moved after 5 days of uncontested support. violet/riga (t) 21:06, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Decision
Talk:The One (magazine)

message: I've verified the split into two magazines. The One did indeed exist as two separate magazines, one dedicated to the ST, the other to the Amiga. The Amiga version was later renamed back to The One.  — JIP | Talk 20:58, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/JarlaxleArtemis/Proposed decision

message: Psychonaut, please do not propose injunctions directly on this page if you are not an arbitrator. You may use the talk pages associated with this case if you wish to propose injunctions; this page is for proposals by arbitrators only. Thank you. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 21:19, 2005 Mar 3 (UTC)
(I have moved the proposals here. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 21:20, 2005 Mar 3 (UTC))
Given the sheer volume of allegedly inappropriate uploads and edits of images, I propose that JarlaxleArtemis be enjoined from uploading images until arbitration proceedings are finished. Psychonaut 20:22, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dammar gum

message: This page has to have a redirect from "Damar," and even "Damar varnish." Bus stop (talk) 14:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Iolcos

message: In Wikipedia the "capitol i" and lower-case L appear identical and therefore it is 100% unclear whether this location is called "Iolcos" or "IOICOS" or "Lolcos" or "Loicos."  It seems pretty much a given that around 99% of readers of this article will not be able to tell which it is, since this location is extremely unknown and "obscure."  In my opinion, at the least a pronounciation should be provided.
 It's not 100% unclear if you check the URL. 79.136.46.216 (talk)
::Actually, yes it still is, but that's not the big problem here. The way the article title is spelled, Iolcos, is not a spelling that is ever used in English (except here, apparently). The Latin spelling is Iolcus, and the Greek is usually transliterated Iolkos, as the article mentions. Where a name occurs in both these languages, English generally uses the Latin spellings, particularly when the name occurs more in mythology than in history, as is the case here. (And please remember to both sign and date your posts.) 173.77.97.57 (talk) 22:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling problem 
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 8, 2005

message: The suggested image (:Image:Dressing the Wounded during a Gas Attack (Austin O Spare).jpg which I originally uploaded) is currently .  Is it wise to use it with a featured article?  I haven't as yet been able to determine its copyright status and so was hoping to get it deleted.  I apologise for not having dealt with it sooner and let it get this far. Geoff/Gsl 22:22, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Fellowship of Isis

message: As mentioned below, much of the material is from the FOI manifesto, and it sounds that way. Please could the editor make some amendments to correct the tone of the article. Phrases like "membership is free" sound too much like advertising. Also the use of ellipsis (three dots) is not good style for an encyclopaedia. As the editor is obviously involved in the organisation, it should be fairly straightforward (now that time has elapsed) to take another look at the text and slowly replace the general expressions used in promotional material with facts. 
Fingat (talk) 10:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral point of view 

message: Isis was not a Greco-Roman deity, she was from Egypt. The Greeks and Romans eventually incorporated her into their pantheon, but her origin is in Egypt. That should be changed. ~Unknown Author
: The above statment is not entirly correct; Asset, the Egyptian goddess on which the Greco-Roman Isis is based, is an Egyptian diety. However, in this context this argument is irrelevany eitehr way, because the focus of the FOI is not the reproduction of any pantheon of any era, but instead to spread a spiritualism and world view inspired by a personal but absract idea of the feninine creatirix divinity which is equally well represented by Asset or Isis as they are described by thier respective cultures. Lady Olivia Robertson, the FOI's primary author and public voice, uses the two names interchangably to refer to her muse who seh sees as an image representing all gods and goddesses as well as creation itself (_Call of the Goddess_ & "The Fellowship of Isis Manifesto" by Lady Olivia Robertson in addtion to other works within the FOI literguy). --Hypatia360 06:30, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isis Origins 

message: Most of this entry is copied directly from the FOI Manifesto. This is not a problem in the lest as Lady Olivia gives full permission to reprint it at will, and in fact encourages others to do so such that it may be widely shared. My guess, is that she would be thrilled to know that it has been published on Wiki along with a link to the website. 
However, to be accurate and in keeping with the Wiki standards, this should be noted and cited. The parts that are directly from the Manifesto should be in quotes, and other more objective and informational sections should be added beyond the Fellowship's own literugy and it's founder's own discription of the order. This is a great deal of information avalible on the FOI site, including AU emails, for anyone who wished to do this research and report on the FOI from the outside.--Hypatia360 06:30, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation, reccognition of the author, and more objective information needed 

message: I wish she had her own article. She seems to be an interesting and noteworthy character.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.71.2 (talk) 17:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olivia Robertson
Talk:The New England Journal of Medicine

message: The NEJM is not a strict open access, so I removed the category.  Some articles of the current issue are available for free, but the remainder of the issues back six months are by subscription only. Where does this fit with the Green/Gold methodolgy of OA ?Ericblazek 03:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not strict open access

message: Is that some kind of joke, that the journal became popular/respectable after getting that award, as if it weren't already?  Should that paragraph be removed?  67.117.130.181 15:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Polk award 

message: Why do articles for the NEJM and JAMA both indicate that the respective journals are the most read/circulated?  Surely there needs to either be further clarification or better and more accurate citations for at least one of these entries.  (Another example of Wikipedia as a sub-par source for information these days...). Tatumstevens (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Superlative Status? 

message: There is a rare piece of art shown or a quote (possibly as filler).  I saw a painting several years ago that  I am trying to track down.  I have tried the website and google, but no luck.  Does anyone know how I might be able to find it?  Thanks. Hoover12345! (talk) 23:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  painting seen in nejm
Talk:Olav Aukrust

message: From Aukrust (a vfd candidate): 
Aukrust is a Norwegian family, originally from Lom. One line settled in Alvdal in the beginning of the 20th century. The family was first mentioned in a document from 29 June 1367, and the family still keep the farms. The original farm has been separated into three: Sygard (south-farm), Nordgard (north-farm) and Nørdre (northern). Nørdre was separated from Nordgard in 1821. It is not known when Sygard was separated. Olav Aukrust, Pål Aukrust and Lars, father of Kjell Aukrust, were born at Nordgard.
--VivaEmilyDavies 22:49, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kjell Aukrust

message: From Aukrust (vfd candidate)
Aukrust is a Norwegian family, originally from Lom. One line settled in Alvdal in the beginning of the 20th century. The family was first mentioned in a document from 29 June 1367, and the family still keep the farms. The original farm has been separated into three: Sygard (south-farm), Nordgard (north-farm) and Nørdre (northern). Nørdre was separated from Nordgard in 1821. It is not known when Sygard was separated. Olav Aukrust, Pål Aukrust and Lars, father of Kjell Aukrust, were born at Nordgard.
--VivaEmilyDavies 22:49, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Encyclical

message: Why the links to articles on popes for which this article lists no encyclicals? --Jim Henry 23:05, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant links? 

message: Should probably say something about the distinction between "encyclical" and other terms used for various papal documents - allocution, bull, motu proprio, etc. --Jim Henry 23:05, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  to do 

message: I removed listed Popes who had not issued encyclicals that were notible since they seemed to have no place in the list of encyclicals.  Note that I only removed names of popes with zero encyclicals listed below them (I didn't go arbitrarily deleting encyclicals listed).  If there was a purpose for their inclusion which escapes me, please revert and poke me on my talk page.  Thanks.  -SocratesJedi | Talk 01:04, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  People 

message: The first Papal encyclical was Ubi primum by Pope Benedict XIV and was issued on 1740.12.03 as can be seen from the whole list.
So the start of the list Important papal encyclicals:
*Pope Eugene IV (1431-1447)
**Sicut Dudum 1435
*Pope Saint Pius V 7 January 1566 to 1 May 1572
**Quo Primum 19 July 1570
Is actually list of bulls not of encyclicals. Avihu (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual errors 
Talk:Interstate 126

message: According to the NHS map, I-126 ends at Gadsden Street (?). According to the SCDOT traffic counts, I-126 ends at Gadsden Street. --NE2 23:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: East end

message: What does I-126 actually have to do with I-20? If you look on any map, they don't come together, so, what gives?  Allen (talk) 00:16, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate 20
Talk:News server operation

message: A spool isn't an inode, and there many other technical problems in here.  Don't be alarmed as things get clarified. --iMb~Mw 23:41, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: "During 2004, one poster conducted a test and reported that there was basically no change in repost requests with article sizes below 1MB.  This would imply that most users should post with article sizes as close to 1MB as practical to improve server efficiency."
Anonymous anecdotal stuff like this, while quite probably true, doesn't fit in with Wikipedia sourcing policies very well.  Even a Google link with the details would work.  I realize that this could be a problem if the report was posted somewhere like alt.binaries.news-server-comparison that isn't well archived, but if we can't nail down specific sources it's best not to get into specific numbers.  Meanwhile, it will still be here in the talk page. --iMb~Mw 03:32, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs a reference 

message: I see there's an INN article but no Diablo article (I put up a request in WP:RA).  Can anyone briefly describe the relative merits of each compared with the other?  Phr (talk) 16:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  INN vs Diablo
Talk:Mars (disambiguation)

message: There is a problem, I just made a page called Mars Incorporated (following an not existing link), but there is also a page called Mars, Incorporated, I see now. What is right?
:They tend to use a comma in their www.mars.com website, so i've used this as the main one.
:I've copied your page over and tried to integrate it, Mars, Incorporated. Tristanb 07:34 12 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Mars (planet) is being proposed to be moved to Mars, with reference to Mars (disambiguation) at the top.  Any objections or comments should be listed on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Anthony DiPierro 18:05, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: In case anyone is wondering how I chose the entries for the common uses section, it's largely based on the page view statistics here: . While page views shouldn't be the only thing considered, this is one of those cases where a few articles stand way out from the others and I also just didn't feel like anything important was being left out. If anyone thinks there's a glaring omission, please do make your case. -- Fyrael (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common uses
Talk:List of schools in Singapore

message: This page was voted on for deletion at List of schools in Singapore.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 00:04, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is already an extensive list of Singaporean schools here. I do not think it is right to have a seperate article dedicated to this. Optakeover 15:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: where should I put School of the Arts, Singapore? I don't really understand the british categories.  DaronDierkes (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SOTA.sg 

message: * Listing of Primary schools available at MOE website--Lionratz (talk) 14:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of schools 
Talk:Sugababes

message: This page says there were 5 tours whereas Change Tour says it was the girls' fourth and final tour. Stifle (talk) 14:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tours 

message: Formal proposal to merge Mutya Keisha Siobhan to this article after reversion of this bold merger. MKS article largely repeats information here, with some extra detail that strays into non-notability (such as unsourced tour setlist and long list on unreleased songs). Now the original trio have reclaimed the Sugababes name, there is no distinction between the two bands - they just used a different name for legal reasons for a couple of years. And, although this wasn't known publicly until later, the Jade/Amelle/Heidi iteration of the Sugababes had disbanded before the other three reunited. U-Mos (talk) 19:44, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: However, this new table format has created two problems which I am not able to fix:
In light of this, perhaps the timeline should just be reverted back to how it was in August - with the album information? I invite others to look at both options and decide Grand Dizzy (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline of members
Talk:Mahir Çağrı

message: Was this guy the inspiration for Borat? -R. fiend 00:18, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Was this guy the inspiration for Borat?

message: On 3 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mahir Cagri for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 15:47, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
*Yay, the system works!  Tempshill 05:26, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: from Vfd

message: At the San Francisco appearance, Mahir was led through a meta-web of scenes from his webpage...
What is a meta-web? Could there be some confusion with the San Francisco based company named Metaweb?
-- Peter 16:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meta-web? 

message: "...a typical Turkish creep" seems a bit editorial.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.98.85.88 (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  x 

message: Is there some reason that his music career, such as it was, is not mentioned?  I cannot find anything about it now, but I distinctly remember the one-off dance track "I Kiss You" actually charted somewhere, like Canada maybe?, which seems worth mentioning. 97.126.56.236 (talk) 10:21, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "I Kiss You" 

message: I have added a note as the url redirects to a malware infected website. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 13:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ikissyou.org is malware infected 

message: I remember being familiar with Mahir Cagri's original webpage before it was hacked and changed into something that made him look ridiculous, uneducated and sexually inappropriate.  The original webpage had imperfect English, but it was quite acceptable for a Turkish teacher.  I read his responses online, in which he tried to explain himself, and explain what had happened, but the fame of the hacked webpage gained a life of it's own, and he acquiesced to it, and later claimed it as his own.
I have tried to find some original source material on the Wayback machine, but nothing seems to remain of it any more.  I can't include this first-hand anecdotal material in the article, because Wikipedia will ruthlessly have it deleted for being improperly cited, even though I am the source.  Therefore this will have to remain as a talking point only.Landroo (talk) 16:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original webpage.
Talk:Compiler directive

message: "In HTML a compiler directive can be used to denote whether a page should be cached or not."
This may be inaccurate. HTML does not compile. The directive is enclosed in a meta tag. Opinions? --Avochelm 12:27, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, looks like a premature move. C doesn't call them "pragmas" — just "directives" — although a lot of implementations do provide a directive named #pragma. As for "significant comments," I've never heard that term used, but Turbo Pascal uses {$I foo} and other such dollar-sign-prefixed comments for the same things other languages use compiler directives for, so it's not uncommon. --Quuxplusone 03:53, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: HTML

message: The current setup is a bit of a mess.  The 3 articles need to be reorged. Mathiastck 20:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pragma compiler preprocessor directive