lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hanszen College

message: I'm pulling off the comment about "Please don't delete this..."  It's not appropriate for Wikipedia, and as a Hanszen alum, I think it looks pretty immature.  I think the whole sheriff comment is pretty immature, but maybe you guys actually do stuff like that.  Jcloudm 14 Aug 2006
We could probably go a little bit more in-depth on the government, as the current version makes no mention whatsoever of the committees. HFH '04 --69.7.175.177 13:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Hanszen's Legacy section needs sourcing for the histories of the various establishments mentioned there.  Please read through WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV for information on Wikipedia content, and read WP:CITE for information on how to cite the references.  Thanks!  Dreadstar † 21:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Hey J8tennet, I really like the comments, it's a really interesting history that, as a Hanszen Alum ('08) I'd never heard.
Probably though, you should phrase them as a quote and that would make you the source for teh facts in the article (just quote yourself like it was a newspaper).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Braddodson (talk • contribs) 04:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Almost the entire "Grounds" section is unnecessary, unencyclopedic information, and frankly, it's not even interesting. If there are no reasoned objections, it's going to get pared down to the roughly three sentences it deserves. The "Legacy" section needs much better referencing, and I'll be trying to find and add those shortly. Also, if someone who knows a bit more about it would add a History section or similar, that would be fantastic, but if not I'll see if I can get to it. Jgr2 (talk) 04:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grounds?
Talk:Hartlip

message: This page links to the disambiguation page Corn, but I'm not sure which sense is intended.  Can you help?  Thanks. — Pekinensis 21:22, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corn 
Talk:Bombay mix

message: This page links to the disambiguation page Corn, but I'm not sure which sense is intended.  Can you help?  Thanks. — Pekinensis 21:28, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corn 

message: Is that a name or brand?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.81.170 (talk) 03:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kush Kush 

message: No mention of noodles? Aren't they the main constituent?
:No. Bazonka (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Noodles

message: mmmmmmm bombay mix :-)
i like it too. do a youtube search for bombay mix and click on a result with a dark thumbnail
"would you like a snickers? would you like a twix? no! i'd prefer some BOMBAY MIX!" -- ms.henrick
we should really not misuse the talk pages people! Ms.henrick (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, we should!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.69.218.201 (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  mmmmm 

message: This item or variety of this is available all over in India. Title may be renamed to Indian Mixture. --Vssun (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Indian Mixture 

message: I removed the claim that this is called "Suzy mix" in the United States, due to lack of citation after several months.  This claim was added by an anonymous editor and sounds like it could be a prank. If anyone can verify the claim is true, it would be helpful to provide some evidence.  Thanks!  -- Beland (talk) 22:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suzy mix 
Talk:Ben Cheney

message: This was removed by another editor. I'm not sure if true or not, but I copied it here for others to investigate in the future. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 19:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  credited with standardizing the size of wall studs
Talk:Morning glory (disambiguation)

message: link has been put back and reworded as it was for the SONG "morning glory", which is on the album (whats the story) Morning Glory?.  please stop reverting.  --Heah (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  oasis 

message: :Done. The article is only semi-protected, if you wish to edit such articles, you only have to create an account. --Conti|✉ 16:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: firework

message: the commonly used slang for Nocturnal penile tumescence is morning glory, please stop removing this  as it is a valid encyclopedic entry--jonnic1 16:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop removing links
Talk:Liu

message: I propose that Liu (柳) be merged into Liu. Much of the contents on Liu (柳) are substantially similar to what is found on Liu under a subsection. Amythewillowprincess (talk) 18:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No merge.  Liu_(柳) has been long enough to be an independent article. --Neo-Jay (talk) 02:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Jay, are you talking about article length or length of time it's existed? Either one still doesn't provide enough reason to keep it if it's just a copy of the subsection anyway. Mousenight (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 07:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

text: I agree with you, Amy, the article in question doesn't seem to stand on its own very well. However, I don't see what there would be to merge into the main article, seeing as how its entirety is already contained in the subsection. Perhaps an article deletion and redirect are in order? I can't see what merit it has as an independent article vs the subsection. Mousenight (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 07:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I was People from Northern Vietnam, and I never heard Liu 刘 translate to Liễu. There is Only way translate 刘 in Vietnamese: Lưu Đào Từ Ngọc (talk) 04:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Vietnamese Liu translate is Liễu (northern)?
Talk:Morning Glory

message: Move the film back to Morning Glory (this is the way it was prior to Heah's move):
# Cburnett 21:38, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
# support Lachatdelarue (talk) 22:44, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Film (this page)

message: Please specify what should be at Morning Glory.
# Heah 22:51, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason for the film to be anywhere but it's title. The capital 'G' in the title makes it unneccessary to disambiguate it from the others, since Morning Glory and Morning glory are two different pages. Lachatdelarue (talk) 23:14, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Other

message: Please just move the article, the page was previously used by the flower article, the film is clearly named after (ie for) the flower. Sorry that I can't move it as a "new user" (someone kick a wiki-admin for that policy), please someone else do it as a matter of urgency and put the flower article in this place. -- Unlikelynick 10:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  URGENT: Don't vote, just move
Talk:Muscat (disambiguation)

message: ...not here? –Howard the Duck 06:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've requested a move at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Basis9 (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is [[Muscat, Oman]]... 
Talk:Rat Terrier

message: I noticed all photos of the Rat Terriers on this page have tipped ears.  In my experience working with rat terriers, this is less common than the upright variety...
As such I inserted a photo of a rat terrier with upright ears.--Macboots 17:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In my experience with multiple Rat Terriers, the ears will always be tipped in puppies. If they're going to stand up, they probably will be upright by the time the dog is 4 or 5 months old. White Arabian Filly Neigh 20:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Ears 

message: The health section states that
:The average lifespan of a Rat Terrier is 18–23 years old.
There is no reference for this assertion and the numbers seem very high. Compared to other listings of average life span the numbers are high; most estimates range from 11 to 18. In no case have I seen anything over 18 years.
This website says life expectancy is 17-18 years:
http://www.newrattitude.org/adoptasenior.htm
This website says it is 11-14 years:
http://www.caninecrib.com/dog/breeds/rat-terrier/
This website says 12-18 years:
http://www.vetstreet.com/dogs/rat-terrier
This website says 15-18 years:
http://www.purebredpups.org/breed_info/159/rat_terrier.aspx
WebMD lists the lifespans for 20 breeds of dogs (from the World Atlas of Dog Breeds) and none exceed 15 years:
http://pets.webmd.com/dogs/features/dogs-and-life-span-which-breeds-live-longest?page=2
:Poodles are considered among the most long-lived dogs where 17 "is not unusual" - from a quote of "Mark Stickney, DVM, director of General Surgery Services at Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences" on the first page of the WebMD article.
There's a website that lists dog longevity data: Dog Longevity, Created by Dr. Kelly M. Cassidy, 2007. This site looks at both Vet school studies and surveys. While the site doesn't have specific data for Rat Terriers, its data on "Traditional Terriers" indicates that the longest lived terrier breeds live to 14 years. http://users.pullman.com/lostriver/breeddata.htm#Terrier_Traditional 
Only 5 breeds live to the 14 to 15 year old range and these are all miniature breeds.  http://users.pullman.com/lostriver/weight_and_lifespan.htm    
I would replace this sentence with one that says "the life expectancy for Rat Terriers is about 14-15 years but that estimates range from as low as 11 to as high as 18" and I would cite some of these sources. Or, simply say "the life expectancy estimates for Rat Terriers range from as low as 11 to as high as 18."Ileanadu (talk) 19:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health - Longevity
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stubsensor

message: Is it feasible to generate a list of pages that are not tagged as stubs but should be? This could also identify any false negatives in the stub detection, because they would become false positives. Susvolans (pigs can fly) 12:29, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Run Stubsensor in reverse? 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: I think that we may need more dumps, as there is only one left. SikiWtideI (Speak to the backwards police) 15:50, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More stub dumps
Talk:Diet (assembly)

message: All the dictionaries I've checked say that in English it's pronounced the "normal" English way,  (not ), so I don't think we need to note the pronunciation in the article. Mendor 16:58, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually came here to make sure that the pronunciation for both senses of the word was the same, so I think it would be a useful addition. 128.143.67.220 (talk) 20:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Agreed, there is no such thing as a "normal" way to pronounce anything in English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.163.28 (talk) 10:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

text: I think we do need to note the pronunciation, but I think perhaps the only pronunciation we should note is the   one, whereas currently the article also notes the () one.  Note that the OED, Oxford Dictionaries Online, Merriam-Websiter online, and Collins Dictionaries online all only give the [daɪ.ɪt] pronunciation.  The [di.ɛt] pronunciation has just been made up by people who were unfamiliar with the word and assumed it was pronounced differently. 86.186.41.239 (talk) 08:44, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I have never seen the word Diet used for either the Bundestag or the modern Sejm. Can we get some sources for this assertion? Adam 11:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be from sources like this: "The term Bundestag also was applied to the federal Diet of the German Confederation (1815–66)" . It seems not to be used for the modern Bundestag. --Stemonitis 10:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern use

message: I'm not a German speaker, but I have a very hard time believing that "tag" means anything else than "day" in German.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.136.74.215 (talk) 21:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of "tag" in Bundestag
Talk:Lancaster, Lancashire

message: I have restored mention of Robert Gillow, because he was clearly notable in the city. His factory was almost in the very centre of the city and the building was the very first building used by Lancaster University. However, the reference needs tidying up to fit the format of the other references and I am uncertain how to do that. If you think he should be removed, please discuss it here. --Bduke (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Gillow 

message: There is considerable overlap and overlinking between the first couple of paragraphs of Culture and Landmarks. I propose moving those two paragraphs to Landmarks and editing accordingly. Prose is preferable to lists I think. Esemgee (talk) 09:11, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landmarks and Culture 

message: Opening a discussion for some photos for the collage since Lancaster is home to many notable buildings and I've added five been reverted and reinstated to allow a wider discussion for anyone to suggest some ideas. It doesn't hurt for five images to be used inline with other Lancashire settlements. Feel free to suggest any new photos but I'd argue Lancaster Priory and Castle should be included in the lead and Lancaster Cathedral since they dominate the skyline along with the Ashton Memorial. @A.D.Hope @Chocolateediter@Crouch, Swale any suggestions? DragonofBatley (talk) 10:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I'd probably agree. Crouch, Swale (talk)  10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no discussion before you changed the image so I don't understand why one is required now. Three images would be a good guideline for all settlement articles. The three good quality images are more than enough for the infobox. Other images should illustrate content in the article where appropriate, they do not need to make the infobox longer than need be. Esemgee (talk) 11:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That was applied the three photo rule to counties. Not settlements. DragonofBatley (talk) 11:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

text: The current selection of photos are pretty terrible, especially the ones of the castle and bridge. Seasider53 (talk) 11:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to suggest some better ones to add DragonofBatley (talk) 11:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That isn’t how it works. If there are no better options, there’s no obligation to keep the current ones. Seasider53 (talk) 12:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: So you've said they are pretty terrible and haven't suggested any okay. 😂 DragonofBatley (talk) 12:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Also, please use edit summaries. Seasider53 (talk) 12:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collage photos:
Talk:Fighting Network Rings

message: I'm not sure about the various names in the Japanese article, since a lot of them can have several readings and no furigana is provided to clarify. Somebody who is a little more knowledgeable about the puroresu scene will have to fill in.  — Gwalla | Talk 22:38, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Did RINGS start up again? See http://www.rings.co.jp/. hateless 07:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resurrection? 

message: I think it is noteworthy that RINGS has similar rules to New Jersey Unified Rules of MMA except punches to the face of a grounded opponent are illegal. --131.122.190.238 02:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  different rules from MMA 

message: I have seen at least one list available at  which lists three title belts in RINGS, the Heavyweight, Light Heavyweight, and Middleweight championships. Given that Fedor Emelianenko is such a huge name in the sport, I am wondering why I've never heard of him holding this title. 
1998/01/21	Kiyoshi Tamura
		Won 1997 Battle Dimension Tournament to become first champ
1998/05/29	Bitzsade Tariel	Sapporo
1999/05/22	Kiyoshi Tamura [2]	Tokyo
2000/04/20	Gilbert Yvel	Tokyo
2000/05	VACANT
		Yvel jumped to Pride
2001/08/11	Fedor Emelianenko	Tokyo
		Beat Bobby Hoffman in tournament final
2002/02/15	PROMOTION CLOSES
I haven't seen any other mention of title belts in RINGs. Also, upon further research, it seems that Fedor fought Renato Sorbral, not Hoffman.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.60.230 (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Belts? 

message: According to all the information I have on the events tony never compeated in RINGS anyone car to provide some evidence? only other australian I can think of Is Chris Hasemans brother Mark.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The New Fox (talk • contribs) 07:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tony Bonello 

message: Ok, I think I sorta got the gist. 1995-1999 era is kinda like Pancrase's 1993-1996 period where they sorta pick and choose what are real or worked fights.
* 1991-1994: Shoot Wrestling style Pro Wrestling/Maeda's UWF continuation
* 1995-1999: early Pancrase-style "selective Pro Wrestling/MMA fights."
* 1999-2001: KOK Rules/MMA proper
'nuff said. --  TrickShotFinn (talk) 09:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of professional wrestling and MMA eras.
Talk:Love It to Death

message: What was the release date of the album? Sources are not in agreement. The earliest versions of this article say 1971, then February 1971.
(Someone in Nashville using the IP range Special:Contributions/2600:1700:5D53:260:0:0:0:0/64 has been changing the dates on various albums, using less reliable sources such as a blog and rateyourmusic.)
*March 8: The FA version of the article in 2015 said the release date was March 8, 1971, cited to page 27 in the Sherman book, The Illustrated Collector's Guide to Alice Cooper, . In early April 1971, Billboard said the album had been released "several weeks" previously, but they had to be recalled because the record company name was spelled wrong. The time frame agrees with early March, but the source also says this is the second time the album was pulled from shelves. An earlier release is implied. The first time March 8 was stated in the article was in December 2014 when  was working the article up to GA level.
*February 1: The RIAA certification page says Feb 1. This reference should be cited in the article for Gold and Platinum dates.
*January: The All Music Guide to Rock printed January 1971 as the release date. This book was printed in 2002, so it's not influenced by Wikipedia. The AllMusic website continues this date. A supporting source is Marky Ramone writing in his book about how his album Dust was released in January 1971, followed shortly by Love It to Death, "released just after ours..." This statement could also support an early Feb release.
*January 12: Classic Rock Review. This is essentially a self-published blog on the Wordpress platform, posted with a 2011 date. The writer could have picked up this date from Wikipedia, for instance this version of the article from 2008 in which January 12 was added without a citation. I just so happens that Wikipedia said January 12 right before this person posted their review. (See circular reporting.) 
I think we should go with RIAA's date, unless somebody can quote me what Dale Sherman says in the cited book. Lots of authors confuse first chart entry date with release date. Binksternet (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date? What the sources say
Talk:Battle of Pacocha

message: I'm working on it, needs work Falphin 22:41, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Notice/Archive 1

message: Please try to use this template sparingly. It looks very strident on a page. Oleg Alexandrov 22:47, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Use sparingly

message: Does anyone object if I replace the PNG currently used with an SVG information icon? El T 14:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any objections to switching to SVG?
Talk:Mario Lozano

message: For a May 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mario Lozano
----
Should this article survive deletion review, I welcome all Wikipedians to help me to improve this piece.
I anticipate that a great deal of the content will relate to the activities of the Italian prosecutors (or rather, the Investigating Magistrates) who, whether or not they choose to indict Lozano, will generate interest in the case.
----
"...a blunder in data security by the Coalition Forces in Iraq revealed the names of all personnel involved in the shooting (the PDF report, written with Microsoft's word processor, containing all the names not even crypted accessible on demand)."  I don't understand what this means--it looks like someone's working notes which were forgotten about and saved in the article.  I've (hopefully) clarified things, but could do better if I had a source for this sentence.  I removed the reference to MS Word, since I really don't understand why it's relevant which word processor was used to write the PDF.AdamBradley 23:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled