Talk:Anatolian leopard

message: There is no sense in having the reference "Anatolian Tigers, a term used for fast-growing inland cities of Turkey" for this article.  It's like having a reference for the Jaguar automobile included for an article on the animal Jaguar!  In any case, that article is for tigers, not leopards.  Better would be to include a picture of this animal, for example from past Hurriyet articles, with proper permissions obtained for copyright.  I am not removing the said reference, as I do not want to get into fights.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.242.51.234 (talk) 09:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An image used in this article, File:Anadoluparsi Hurriyet1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 12 October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Anadoluparsi Hurriyet1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: ‎FunkMonk suggested to merge this article with the one about the Persian leopard. Please explain why you think this makes sense. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 09:09, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It makes no sense at all. The Anatolian Leopard is a distinct subspecies. It's been over a month so I have removed the template. Afro-Eurasian (talk) 20:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The article suggests they're not distinct. FunkMonk (talk) 06:55, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

text: This assumption is not correct. Subsuming P.p. tulliana to ciscaucasica/saxicolor in the IUCN red list does not imply anything regarding tulliana's taxonomic status. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: "and is currently subsumed to the Caucasian leopard" This means exactly that, it is invalid as a distinct taxon. So we need to know whether that is correct or not.FunkMonk (talk) 11:04, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

text: Which would be an issue for the Cat Classification Taskforce to subsume Panthera pardus ciscaucasica syn. Panthera pardus saxicolor to Panthera pardus tulliana, but anyways, I created Perso-Anatolian leopard for convenience, in case there had to be a merger. Leo1pard (talk) 13:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge|Persian leopard ? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Anatolian leopard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://pensoftonline.net/zookeys/index.php/journal/article/download/170/343
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303173809/http://www.nhma.gr/?p=6&l=2 to http://www.nhma.gr/?p=6&l=2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091221061949/http://www.iucnredlist.org:80/apps/redlist/details/15961/0 to http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/15961/0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091030001436/http://www.freewebs.com:80/anatolianleopard/photos.htm to http://www.freewebs.com/anatolianleopard/photos.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Anatolian leopard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.princeton.edu/~eakcay/publications_files/sekercioglu_et_al2011.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111175408/http://www.goodmorningturkey.com/anatolian-leopard-sighted-turkey-first-time-years-killed-shepherd/ to http://www.goodmorningturkey.com/anatolian-leopard-sighted-turkey-first-time-years-killed-shepherd/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111174627/http://www.goodmorningturkey.com/mystery-anatolian-leopard-seen-shot-forensics/ to http://www.goodmorningturkey.com/mystery-anatolian-leopard-seen-shot-forensics/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303173809/http://www.nhma.gr/?p=6&l=2 to http://www.nhma.gr/?p=6&l=2
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/15961/0
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.freewebs.com/anatolianleopard/photos.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anatolian leopard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303232940/http://wild-cat.org/pardus/infos/Khorozyan2006Leopard-taxonomy.pdf to http://wild-cat.org/pardus/infos/Khorozyan2006Leopard-taxonomy.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 13:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: I am glad you are both working hard towards the same goal of informing the public properly about these important animals. I don't have an opinion on binomials but perhaps you would like to put your reasoning politely below about when they should be included in the article:
Chidgk1 (talk) 06:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If this page would be ready to qualify for GA, I'd agree that Latin names are necessary. But not really in a start-class page. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 07:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no harm in putting them in now. It's a very short section too. Ddum5347 (talk) 15:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

text: The trinomial should be used in the lede, like it is in other animal subspecies and population articles. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We're talking about binomials in the "prey" subsection. Ddum5347 (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, that's different. Only if it doesn't have a vernacular name should the binomial be used. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  When should binomials be used in this article? 

message: Chidgk1 (talk) 06:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: None without the permission of authors. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 08:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Correct me if I am wrong but I think that means they have already given permission.Chidgk1 (talk) 09:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: To be on the safe side, I think it would be better if the authors themselves upload images. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 10:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I suppose if I cut them out of the pdf they might not be such good quality as the ones the authors have. I have written to ask them. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which pictures should be added from Sarı et al?