Talk:Ovintiv

message: This page is not currently neutral and impartial. The environmental practices section is coped from the EnCana webpage and does not reflect any of the past or current legal action around EnCana:
The recent B.C. EnCana explosions are near Kelly Lake, where a group called the Kelly Lake Metis Settlement Society launched a lawsuit in 2004 complaining the company wasn't consulting properly about developments that could "threaten the continued existence" of the community.
The lawsuit was dropped in 2006 after an out-of-court settlement, though EnCana says the terms of the agreement are confidential.
EnCana has faced other legal threats over the years, including a class action lawsuit it settled earlier this year over royalty payments in Colorado.
In Alberta, the Department of National Defence has joined environmental groups in raising concerns at public hearings about EnCana's proposed shallow gas project near Suffield National Wildlife Area.
And last summer, residents of Kelly Lake, B.C., held a road block to protest oil and gas activity in the region.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.231.110.50 (talk) 01:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we remove the above unsigned rants?  Contributions to the talk page must be related to improvement of the article, but the above "BC-Commie" nonsense is completely off-topic Santamoly (talk) 16:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The intro says the name is a portmanteau of Energy, Canada and Alberta, but I don't see Alberta's contribution to the name... M.Nelson (talk) 04:46, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portmanteau 

message: I'm going to begin a re-write to divide the article into meaningful sections, include criticism in the related areas, and provide some flow to the article. Max.inglis (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Carsen - unless you can provide a good reason, I'm going to revert the article to the re-writes I made. I removed self-promotional material, unsourced items, and grouped the article into more meaningful sections. I'm guessing your promotion elsewhere of the facebook group and encanalies.com page means that you're somehow involved in the administration of those and have interest in those remaining in the article. Please read WP:NOTSOAPBOXMax.inglis (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Totally agree. This article needs to be neutral and unbiased, but the history section is written to reframe Encana as a "repeat offender" of sorts. Right or wrong, that's not the purpose of this article.Landroo (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 

message: The convert function  is not correct.  Nobody measures a quantity of gas by cubic kilometers. Energy units should be used here. Also, a "billion" can be either 1,000,000,000 (one thousand million=109) or 1,000,000,000,000 (one million million=1012) depending on who's talking and where you're from.  Santamoly (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Units

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Encana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203074120/http://www.china.ualberta.ca/en/In%20the%20News/2012/December/EncanasPetroChinaPartnershipMayBeFirstofMany.aspx to http://www.china.ualberta.ca/en/In%20the%20News/2012/December/EncanasPetroChinaPartnershipMayBeFirstofMany.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified