lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Beta-keratin

message: The article talks about beta-keratin's structure, where it's found, etc., but never once tells the reader what it is.  That should be in the first sentence.  J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 17:46, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it? 

message: It appears that there are some sort of notes left at the bottom of the article; they are found below the box in the "External Links" section. It is unclear if that was a draft, should be weaved into the body of this article. or is mistakenly left there. I am fascinated by this topic but I am still learning so I do not want to change this material myself. Can someone with more knowledge provide insight into what should be done with this? Thank you. C19H12ampION (talk) 22:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The text is still there, and I'm too still learning and don't have the confidence to edit it :) בצאת ישראל (talk) 08:06, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Same. This out of place text has now been there for 12 years, but a good cleanup will require a knowledgable editor.Ike9898 (talk) 16:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: After reading through the out-of-place text, I do understand it, and it's mostly tangential to the subject of the article. I don't think there is much in it to salvage that belongs in this article, although it is potentially good information. Dropping it. Ike9898 (talk) 15:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes at bottom of the article 

message: Artoria2e5 proposed a merge into Fibroin on 22 February 2019, without any justification. 
I OPPOSE because it seems to be a misunderstanding.
# Beta-keratin is a vertebrate protein found in birds and reptiles.
# Fibroin is an invertebrate protein found in insects (specifically silk).
So the huge difference warrants separate pages. Chhandama (talk) 03:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it's a bad idea. I put up some InterPro/Pfam boxes linking to protein databases, and they indeed are very different things. Gonna remove the merge box now. --Artoria2e5 🌉 04:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Amritlal Nagar

message: *http://www.indiapicks.com/Literature/Sahitya_Academy/SA_Hindi.htm --Bhadani (talk) 17:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A link

message: I have found that many editors of wikipedia despise Hindus, and therefore I made a suitable clarifications in my edit summary: "a stub about a Hindi writer - it has nothing to do with being a Hindu :)" - plz don't make me. --Bhadani (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Similarly, many Indians are also despised by a section of wikipedians. This is really unfortunate as racial discrimination based on one's faith and nationality is not a good thing. --Bhadani (talk) 18:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About my edit summary

message: I think that Amritlal Nagar was not a hopeless Hindu :) --Bhadani (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hopeless
Talk:Active Meditation

message: Osho in CAPITALS seems rude and unnatural. I know that's how pune people are trademarking and publishing names of meditations. But doesn't seem fit from a general and encyclopedia point of view.  ??? 210.94.41.89 10:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Osho in CAPITALS?

message: I would rather keep Dynamic Meditation and Active Meditation as two separate entries. Dynamic Meditation is the earliest and probably the most well-known of the Active Meditation techniques by far; having a separate page for it creates room to describe the various stages involved. Jayen466 17:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: just wanted to say thanks for the recent changes to this article. the quotes had copyright issues, as they were from a website, and the tonality was POV. i was considering a rework, as well as afd (list+lack or refs), but it now seems to be in wiki order. the_undertow talk 03:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to merge Active Meditation and Dynamic Meditation 

message: Active Meditation techniques are the primary meditation techniques created by Osho. A couple of generic statements about his view of meditation are not out of place. Please let them be there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamal006 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The first of the two restored paras doesn't make sense, as it is written (the average reader will go, Huh?), and the second one is unsourced. I'll have a look if there is any secondary literature that goes into more detail on Osho's views on meditation. Jayen466 16:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Statements about meditation 

message: This entire article is unsourced and meditation/Osho is covered in depth already at Osho#Meditation. See also Dynamic Meditation, which also redirects there. Cirt (talk) 08:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Cirt (talk) 12:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected to [[Osho#Meditation]]
Talk:Philipsburg, Centre County, Pennsylvania

message: I too am a local resident and Wikipedian who has done extensive research on the history of Philipsburg. If you want the sources I can point you to Linn's History of Centre County. You can also look at the Journals of Hardman Philips at the Penn State Archives. The rest has been gleamed from published local histories, including Schultz's all on file at the Philipsburg library. As for the "biased" treatment of Conklin, it is only biased if you do not accept the reality that Front Street is being hurt by an elected official. Hillshirefarmssausage 17:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Response to Author's Identity/Sources

message: I would love to see several photos added that highlight the beauty of Philipsburg. The currrent town hall and park come to mind. Philip's mannor, the Union and Anglican churches, and the Simmler house. If these could be added I think it would be of great help to the page. Hillshirefarmssausage 17:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commons Submissions

message: As a local resident and Wikipedian, I'm curious as to where this person's information is coming from. The information on the Philips Settlement is more or less correct, but I can't be sure without sources, which I will check on in the real world, since I doubt alot of it exists online as of yet. The last paragraph of this article seems especially biased, as though they're resentful of Mr. Conklin for moving his office. While it was a shady move, yes, it doesn't require that kind of treatment on a resource site such as this. I'm going to speak to the comission ASAP and bring this page to their attention, so that the Borough of Philipsburg isn't misrepresented. Lostprophyt 17:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Author's Identity/Sources

message: Philipsburg is home to quite a few Historical notables. A "Historical Places"-type section is probably in order. I'll be culling these together in the next few weeks as I find time. Also, I'll be snapping a few photos and uploading them to the Commons for some color. Lostprophyt 17:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General

message: I've removed the history section--it's much too long for the topic and completely uncited. It's in the page history if someone wants to take it up but a paragraph or two at most would be more appropriate. Mackensen (talk) 01:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section removed
Talk:Interferon-gamma receptor

message: The two proteins are not associated, they don't bind with each other, and are not homologs. This article conjures a protein group or family that does not exist in any reference or database, like many others here, just for the sake of catchiness and, probably, laziness to create separate articles. --SCIdude (talk) 14:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  not associated
Talk:Lok Ma Chau

message: Does anyone have an opinion on this article?
1) The article has a template justifiably added to the beginning pointing out that the article doesn't have any sources
2) The article doesn't have any structuring that would be provided by section headers
3) The intro says Lok Ma Chau is a village. The pic in the info box has text, "Most of the area in Lok Ma Chau is wetland." Hence, is Lok Ma Chau a village, an area or both?
4) Depending on the answer to question 3, what is the scope of this article?
Any help is appreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.102.148.34 (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure, but may be "Lok Ma Chau" is the name of the area and a village? I really need to have some research by reading 北區風物志 or the much older 新安縣志. And yes, this article was another mess that previous wiki editor failed to create an article that based on existing literature thus may contain hoax. Matthew hk (talk) 16:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: General
Talk:List of human clusters of differentiation

message: * I have completely revamped this list, which I have found very useful in the past, by adding all (probably 200 or so) of the missing entries. 
* Index now should have no gaps.
* I'm using hcdm.org as the ultimate authority for the structure
* I then crosscheck with uniprot.org and use the recommended protein name, often with abbreviated form, followed by "encoded by" and gene name. 
* I then link the CD name and use a little information from the corresponding Wikipedia page where it exists, or from uniprot.
* I'm now linking to the CD name which redirects to the gene page, rather than linking directly to the gene page, in case there are further changes.
* I've added one asterisk to indicate a group name eg CD1* , which has now been subdivided into CD1a, CD1b etc.
* I've added 2 asterisks to indicate a CD number doesn't exist, even as a subunit, on hcdm dot org eg CD12w** My guess is these should be deleted but I'm not confident enough to do so (see CD32 especially)
* CD numbers with red links probably need a Wikipedia page
* I've deleted CD12w - there is no evidence for it. Nothing on hcdm or uniprot, nothing on Google search. There is an entry for CD12 on http://www.ebioscience.com/resources/human-cd-chart.htm but with no information, so maybe it is an old entry. If someone wants to replace it this is the information I removed:
** CD12w phosphoprotein of unknown function present on monocytes, granulocytes, and NK cells and absent from basophils, AML blasts, and bone marrow precursors.
* CD32A and B are interesting, as neither are on hdcm, but they can be found on uniprot and there are Wikipedia pages for 32/a
* CD165 has little info on hdcm, and none on uniprot, reading between the lines though it seems it is used in commercial testing
* I have deleted CD202a - It looks wrong to me. There is no entry for 202a on hcdm.org or uniprot.org and TIE2 is the name for CD202b 
* CD245 appears not to have any info associated with it
* CD296 - on hcdm.org is referred to as both ART1 and ART2. I don't understand this, so have stuck to "ART1 gene"
* several CD numbers are simply listed as "carbohydrate" on the main hcdm list, and invariably not listed on uniprot. I have made an attempt at a description eg 60a, 60b, 60c, 65, 65s, 75, 75s, 77, 173, 175, 175s, 176 - but there may be errors here, as there is little or no info on Wikipedia or the main gene protein sources
GW Bio (talk) 10:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Current favorite is: ALT4: rename article "CDNNN" to "Cell differentiation molecule CDNNN"
Comments are requested. -Kyle(talk) 07:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Two-millionth topic pool

message: Out of curiosity, extrapolating current trends, when is the two-millionth article expected to be created? --Shay Guy 18:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know but you'd probably be interested in Wikipedia:Modelling Wikipedia's growth and Wikipedia:Size of Wikipedia. The graphs are a bit out of date though. --WikiSlasher 04:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am fairly sure it will be in early September, on 11 September at the latest. JIP | Talk 10:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

text: We're getting very close!  Less than 10,000 articles until the 2 millionth. --User101010 22:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The pool has already closed. JIP | Talk 03:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I know it's closed.  I'm the one who closed it.  --User101010 09:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know you know it's closed. I was merely putting it down in writing so other people will know it too. JIP | Talk 10:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

text: El Hormiguero Hmm.... Bigfoot and Cryptids? -- Earl Andrew - talk 10:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

text: When is the 2 millionth topic going to be revealed? Fardell (talk) 08:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Submandibular gland

message: I have modified the Innervation section to indicate that sympathetic innervation causes synergistic effects to the parasympathetic stimulation, and increases exocytosis from certain cells, likely to produce low volume, enzyme rich saliva. I have added the reference (A.R. Ten Cate, pages 339-340), but was not able to link it to the entry. Contemptuous 18:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:CD5 (protein)

message: CD5 is a T cell marker, but in humans suffering from chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL), which is a B-cell malignancy, the cells are positive for CD5. Just a curiosity that should be emphasized in the main article here. It's mentioned in passing that it's found on CLL, but it doesn't point out the strangety that CLL is a B-cell malignancy! Actually, I think mantle cells lymphoma is also a B-cell malignancies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.219.21.30 (talk) 14:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mai Po Marshes

message: The full name is actually:
Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site Let's (draw)!🖊 11:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The full name
Talk:Man Kam To

message: There is no link to the stated reference. I have googled for the "Refugee Concern Network" and cannot find the source listed nor a website for this organization, and all searches for this with "Man Kam To" return references to this wikipedia article. Edgriebel (talk) 14:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed this. It really shouldn't stand without reliable sourcing. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:28, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police Detention Facility
Talk:CAMP receptor protein

message: There was previously a suggestion (since Nov 2010) that we merge this with Cyclic AMP receptors.  I have deleted this suggestion.  The article on Cyclic AMP receptors describes a class of G-coupled protein receptors which are quite dissimilar from this bacterial protein.  Both are justified in having separate pages. SocratesJedi | Talk 23:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not merge with cAMP Receptor Protein 

message: These are the same protein, and it's baffling that the two pages have gone on for an entire decade without a merge, to the point where I'm sure I must be missing something. Yet, on the CAP talk page, there this comment from 2008:
So clearly this is not a new idea. What gives? 73.226.222.77 (talk) 06:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Catabolite Activator Protein]]
Talk:Coenzyme M

message: It looks like Coenzyme M and Mesna are very similar.  In the former, the cation is not specified and in the latter it is lost upon dissolution.  The coenzyme is as pervasive ss methanogenesis, i.e. lots of locales including human gut. Seems like a shame if readers are not able to see both discussed in the same article.  But others might see things differently, i.e. that we are dealing with chloride vs sodium chloride.  We will at least link the two articles, but the question is should we merge them.--Smokefoot (talk) 03:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Law of dilution

message: For some users, the following may create a greater ammount of understanding/clarity, in addition to just having a formula. 
:For any weak electrolyte, Ostwald's dilution law states that the degree of dissociation is inversely proportional to square root of the molar concentration and is directly proportional to the square root of the volume containing one mole of electrolyte.
From: http://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Ostwalds_dilution_law&oldid=312008
I don't know if that is correct, but it may be easier for some to digest. Emesee (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actually stating the law in written English... 

message: I think the article should present also the situation for non-weak electrolytes solutions where activity coefficients are required.--5.2.200.163 (talk) 13:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that a section on stronger electrolytes would be useful. However it is not entirely obvious which equations are valid: the equilibrium constant probably should involve activities rather than concentrations, while conductivity could be described by the Debye–Hückel-Onsager equation. Best would be to find a good reference, perhaps a book on electrochemistry. Dirac66 (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is interesting to notice that conductivity as a transport property is approached by DH(O), which was primarily intended for equilibrium properties like activity.--5.2.200.163 (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

text: I have now rewritten the section and clarified the situation for weak electrolytes as well as strong. Dirac66 (talk) 00:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: An interesting source in electrochemistry which may contain some aspects of interest here by Paul Delahay, mentioned in a review  , including perhaps an expression containing the lambda factor for conductivity (electrolytic)--5.2.200.163 (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to activity coefficients for the case of strong electrolytes 

message: I think that the assumed essentially complete ionic dissociation of strong electrolytes requires a specification of the concentration domain where it holds and the threshold where it starts not to hold.--5.2.200.163 (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:   Essentially complete ionic dissociation of strong electrolytes and high concentrations 

message: I think it would be interesting to see what expression this law has in mixed solvents systems and what are the dissociation equations.--5.2.200.163 (talk) 13:51, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed solvents systems
Talk:Near-equatorial trough

message: Per Chacor's request from a couple months ago, I'm creating this article.  Thegreatdr 18:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: "Near-equatorial trough" is not mentioned in Monsoon trough. --Jerome Potts (talk) 18:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This a synonym for "monsoon trough" ?
Talk:Bessborough School

message: I've added some stuff to the page. There isn't much yet, but I'll get some more information and add it to the page in the near future.Wikiisawesome 11:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: SOME OF THE CLASS INCLUBE MSS LOWES ENGLISH CLASS AND DIFFERENT OTHER ONES  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Senators101 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CLASSES
Talk:New Evening Post

message: Traditional Chinese is not a language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.6.219.161 (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language: Traditional Chinese 

message: I am more curious the founder of the namesake newspaper, Ha Ping, was the same was the actress of the same name or not. Or they are two different person? Anyone can dig out reliable source? Matthew hk (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   Ha Ping
Talk:Acetyl-CoA synthetase

message: Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia editing. I noticed that some of the equations involve text.
E.g. fattyacid + ethanol \Longrightarrow  FAEE
Should I convert these to text like this?
\text{fatty acid} + \text{ethanol} \Longrightarrow  \text{FAEE}
Thanks,
IrateSpecialist (talk) 02:35, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have changed all references to acetyl Co-A to acetyl-CoA. I hope people do not object. thanks. --kupirijo (talk) 11:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acetyl-CoA
Talk:Cerritos, San Luis Potosí

message: Help!  I can't get the category stub back on.  Thanks. Babytexcoco 18:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rednecks (song)

message: I don't want to get into an edit war here, but I completely disagree with the interpretation that the line "free to be put in a cage" means to be jailed.  The cage here is not the literal cage of jail, but rather the figurative cage of poor and predominately black neighbourhoods.  The lyrics mention Harlem in New York City, the south side of Chicago, Roxbury in Boston, Fillmore in San Francisco, etc.  Those aren't jails, those are neighbourhoods.  In the era of segregation — and even when the song was written, and some would argue continuing to today — the ability of underprivileged blacks to cross "colour lines" into better neighbourhoods was just as difficult as if someone had built jail walls around the ghetto. Kevin Forsyth 18:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your comment is quite right. The song's final two verses refer to historically black neighborhoods in northern cities and doesn't mention a single jail:
*Now your northern nigger's a Negro
*You see he's got his dignity
*Down here we're too ignorant to realize
*That the North has set the nigger free
*Yes he's free to be put in a cage
*In Harlem in New York City
*And he's free to be put in a cage on the South-Side of Chicago
*And the West-Side
*And he's free to be put in a cage in Hough in Cleveland
*And he's free to be put in a cage in East St. Louis
*And he's free to be put in a cage in Fillmore in San Francisco
*And he's free to be put in a cage in Roxbury in Boston
*They're gatherin' 'em up from miles around
*Keepin' the niggers down .Bali ultimate (talk) 16:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aldehyde dehydrogenase

message: There is a huge mistake in a redirect associated with this article. When one is looking for aldehyde oxidase, which is a molybdenum containing protein, one is redirected to aldehyde dehydrogenases which are not molybdenum containing proteins. Yes, xanthine oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase which are molybdenum containing proteins are basically the same protein but this doesn't hold for aldehyde oxidase and aldehyde dehydrogenases. With the redirect from aldehyde oxidase to here the actual aldehyde oxidase is lost. Please, take out that redirect from aldehyde oxidase to here. User:209.159.149.166 18:49, 9 October 2010
: Good catch.  The aldehyde oxidase page used to be an independent article and not a redirect.  I have reconverted  "aldehyde oxidase" from a redirect into a enzyme specific page.  Boghog (talk) 16:14, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aldehyde oxidase/dehydrogenase
Talk:Aldolase B

message: I'm looking at Voet and Voet's Biochemistry, 3rd Ed (page 589), and it says class I aldolases are in plants and animals and class II aldolases are in bacteria. (Some organisms have both.)
Can someone confirm that this page is correct? --aciel (talk) 23:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class I and Class II Aldolases 

message: Aldolases technically catalyze reverse aldol reactions, not reverse aldol condensations; to be a reverse condensation, it would need to be a cleavage that involved the incorporation of a small molecule such as water (as in hydrolysis). BCurt (talk) 17:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aldol Condensation versus Aldol Reaction