lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sarah Milledge Nelson

message: "These should still be decided on a case-by-case basis, based on an actual analysis rather than simply "they're bad"." you do not have a broad consensus, or policy basis, to remove images. please discuss before unilaterally removing reliable sourced content. --Turktimex3 (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What "reliable sourced content" are you referring to here? The image you want to include does not have reliable sources. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: the image reliably illustrates the article subject, more so than the image in Plato. present an argument to remove the image other than "they're bad". --Turktimex3 (talk) 13:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You've presented absolutely no evidence that the image reliably illustrates the article subject - either here, on the other pages where you've put forward this same argument, or in the noticeboard discussion you've been pointed to. If you believe that to be the case, the burden of demonstrating that falls on you. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Turktimex3, the onus is on you, as multiple editors have objected. Several times I have directed you to the No Original Research board where there is an active discussion, yet you refuse to participate. If we ever have to escalate this matter to one of the behavioral boards, that isn't going to be a good look for you. Zaathras (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Motorcycle components

message: Digital vs analog displays and the role of CAN deserve mention in the Instruments section.  Also, I suggest breaking out discussion of petcocks & fueling into its own section. -- Brianhe (talk) 05:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I liked the 'dashboard' addition. Not so sure about "at a minimum"; plenty of road bikes, high end and low end, are missing a tach. tedder (talk) 05:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, I'd forgotten that cruisers frequently don't have a tach. Don't virtually all sportbikes have one though? Brianhe (talk) 15:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sportbikes, yes, but don't forget the US market is WAY different than the international market. I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of bikes from Bajaj don't have tachs, for instance. tedder (talk) 15:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Instruments section suggestions

message: Deleted uncited statement concerning these three final drive systems. My understanding is that chain drive is not more efficient than belt, but actually can withstand higher torque/power. And not more resistant than shaft drive to debris, but actually less so (at least for a non-enclosed chain).  This should probably be hashed out at Chain drive#Chains versus belts first, then incorporated here. — Brianhe (talk) 03:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Kevin Cameron has a column in Cycle World that explains that enclosed chains are impractical for anything but very low power bikes because the chain overheats. I can find it. I've got some other sources I think would help too. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chain drive, belt drive and shaft drive 

message: Where is the (race) located on a motorcyle 96.65.39.237 (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motorcycle part location
Talk:Spyder Games

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Lightnin' Slim

message: Having undertaken some modifying edits to this article, I think I have reached an impasse.  I can not find supporting references for any of the wording currently in the third paragraph of the 'Biography' section. (Otherwise the article is pretty well referenced).  The 'Discography' section now has a wikitable version of all his single releases, at least as far as I can uncover at present.  I could do a similar "upgrade" to the 'CD compilations' section, but that would leave the 'Albums' as the odd man out.  Perhaps the detailed information in that area would look clumsy in a table format ? Plus, all the album information has existed in that form for more than nine years.  Should the discography now been split in to another article ?  What to do, what to do.  Other users thoughts would be appreciated, although I not want to give the opinion I own the article.  I could simply walk away and beaver elsewhere. Thanks. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Thoughts please
Talk:Acadian Driftwood

message: " the French and Indian War between the French and the English over what is now Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and most of Maine."
This war, in fact, was fought in Europe, in India, in the Caribbean, and throughout North America, and not just in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and most of Maine. I don't know what the writer meant to say, but what is said is wrong. GeneCallahan (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Scope of the War Is All Wrong
Talk:Pageflakes

message: "The ethnicity of the company's founders is notably diverse,[1] with three of the them coming from Bangladesh."
What? Is that relevant to anything? Sounds like pointless trivia to me. Achilles2.0 21:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random information 

message: The first sentence is pretty unhelpful: 'Pageflakes is an Ajax-based start page similar ..' What is a 'start page'? Surely the idea of an encyclopedia, I know Wikipedia is not the best, is to explain a subject to people who don't already know about a subject.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.54.238.178 (talk) 04:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What is it?

message: Although outages are related to the technology, a separate section would be more useful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultragod (talk • contribs) 18:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Make 'Outages' its own section

message: This article needs to be re-written in light of the fact that Pageflakes is now defunct. —gorgan_almighty (talk) 13:29, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now defunct 
Talk:Suriyani Christians of Kerala

message: See this site.  I've reverted to a version of the article without the copied text.  Note that the google cache shows that the article from everyculture.com predates the wiki article with a cache retrieval timestamp of 29 Jun 2007 21:22:12 GMT. -- Whpq 14:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrights

message: This article is a repetition of the article Syrian Malabar Nasrani which is the main article detailing the cultural aspects of the Saint Thomas Christians of kerala who are also known as syrian christians or suriyani christians. This article cannot exist under the pretext of being a description of the cultural aspects of the st. Thomas christians for it already exists. Please read both these articles and you would realise that this has to be redirected to either the page Saint Thomas Christians or Syrian Malabar Nasrani. The author seems to be creating a page in his own pov without references. He has already deleted passages with references in Syrian malabar nasrani. If such vandals are not checked then wikipedia will loose all its credibility. Vagab 19:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gross vandalism
Talk:Lucrezia de' Medici, Duchess of Ferrara

message: According to the Medici Archives, Lucrezia was born February 14th, 1545 and died April 21st, 1561.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.233.212 (talk) 17:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The book "The Tragedies of the Medici" (2004) references a birth year of 1544. Project Gutenberg link. --Engineerchange (talk) 06:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Date of Birth and Death. 

message: As I recall, the most widely accepted way in which Lucrezia died was of likely poisoning, not tubercolosis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artaxus (talk • contribs) 22:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death by poisoning?
Talk:Daan de Groot

message: You wrote "treize (french)" = 30. No, it means 13. Please change it. (It disgraced a little bit.) :) 87.122.142.233 (talk) 08:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Johanna Gibson

message: Anduin13 22:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. --Edcolins 18:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons to keep page 

message: Please discuss here the removal of categories if you want to do so . I don't quite understand these deletions without any explanations. Thanks. --Edcolins 15:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Charlotte Aglaé d'Orléans

message: Article is filled with trivia & reads like a cheap novel.  It goes off into so many details on the life of other individuals that it becomes difficult to understand who these people are.  Some paragraphs are out of their chronological place; for instance, Charlotte Aglaé is sent back to France in disgrace, but then the story goes on showing her living in France with her husband.  In addition, most statements are not backed with sources.  Frania W. (talk) 14:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article filled with trivia
Talk:Adam Long (American actor)

message: I've tweaked this a bit.  There's a fair amount of work to do but basically this seems to be the right shape for a Wikipedia biography. --Tony Sidaway 22:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tweaks
Talk:Canadian Firearms Program

message: Many of the references are broken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.143.118 (talk) 17:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Multi-link trunking

message: There is an article on each flavor of Nortel's trunking technology. I propose it would be better for readers if the found information on all these variants in a single article and I propose it be this one. -—Kvng 15:56, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: MLT merge proposal
Talk:La Nouvelle Tribune

message: La Nouvelle Tribune is neither a "daily" nor a "newspaper of the Party of Progress and Socialism".
La Nouvelle Tribune is a francophone weekly newspaper published by Fahd Yata. It is a general weekly newspaper with a "business" point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SaadLaaboudi (talk • contribs) 
:Thanks for the corrections Saas. Fixed now. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 10:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Skip Heller

message: Only significant contributions by a single editor and the article reads like a fan bio -- Gudeldar 22:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *You probably shouldn't have removed the AfD template until the AfD was officially closed, but since you were withdrawing your nomination it wasn't a terrible thing to do.  Pablo Talk | Contributions 07:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Speaking YEARS later, the article still appears at the very bottom of the "food chain" in the biography workgroup, and IMHO, barely makes the grade as notable. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 05:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a big fan of this page
Talk:Ricochet Robots

message: I strongly doubt that this is really a NP-complete problem (even considering a general n by n board which I assume is implicitly meant). The reason for this is simply that given that there is only 4 or 5 robots the number of different positions they can be configured in is of order (n^2)^4 for 4 robots, which is polynomial. So given that one may use dynamic programming and in that way do a backward search through all positions one would be able to solve all possible solutions in polynomial time and that would certainly include any specific solution. This solution would also only require polynomial memory so unless I am mistaken this problem is in P given that the number of robots are fixed.
(PositivaPatrik (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer solving 

message: Going by the listings on BoardGameGeek, only one version of the game (the first one?) was called "Ricochet Robot" (singular). The rest were called "Ricochet Robots" (plural), and this is how the game is known.
Why does the Wikipedia article use the singular "Robot" name?
salty-horse (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging more editors to gather input. TheDragonFire (talk) 14:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Because 'Ricochet Robot' came first and is what the game was original known as. Does it really matter? If you change the name of the article to Ricochet Robots with a redirect from Ricochet Robot I don't think anyone will care. —  X  S  G  22:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ricochet Robot vs Ricochet Robots
Talk:Rijkswaterstaat

message: Added. One really appreciates having dry feet, when living below sea-level. ;-) --Kim Bruning (talk) 22:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flood protection and prevention 

message: The ministry uses the name 'Rijkswaterstaat' in Englishhttps://www.government.nl/ministries/ministry-of-infrastructure-and-water-management/organisation. The current title here ('Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management') is an outdated name. Should this page be updated to reflect Rijkswaterstaat's own naming conventions? --Hermandirkzw (talk) 10:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name of Rijkswaterstaat 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 06:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management →  – Since a few years the name Rijkswaterstaat is used in all languages. Translations are no longer in use and are actively discouraged. Herriemand (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 May 2022 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 04:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management →  – The old name(NOT long name) is not used by anyone and is not common usage anymore, any government and new documents don’t use the old name, also I believe Wikipedia policy has nothing against changing of names to update with usage of the past few years also the government website has been updated Alexander vee (talk) 00:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 November 2022 
Talk:Kenny Connolly

message: Further details to be added to this page.
Motherwell Fan 23:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Configuration factor

message: This doesn't seem like a guide to me, judging from its style. I am not familiar with the subject matter. Santtus 23:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your complaint, exactly?  This is meant not as a guide, but as an encyclopedia article on the phenomenon of configuration factor and how it relates to adhesive dentistry. DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 16:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guide?
Talk:Princess Feodora of Saxe-Meiningen

message: There was a "did you know" on the home page leading to this article.  However, when I come here to read about this event, there is no mention in the article of her death.
Maybe I'm confused?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JByrd (talk • contribs) 16:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide?
Talk:Quest for Fire (film)

message: What's wrong with it? Zomputer (talk) 22:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Still no answer? Zomputer (talk) 18:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this article tagged?

message: A lot of the article is not cited. Zomputer (talk) 07:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for more sources

message: The fact that they walked to Africa suggests it was in the middle east. Zomputer (talk) 17:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They encounter woolly mammoths and saber toothed cats, as well as a cave bear.  Those animals were not African, and there were no humans in the New World at that time, so it places them in Eurasia.73.168.225.117 (talk) 02:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Who says this film was set in Europe?

message: What moron decided to discuss the 'historical accuracy' of a film about pre-history?
(hashtag)wikiplebians
:please sign your remarks with four tildas (HammerFilmFan (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Section headed 'Historical accuracy"
Talk:Princess Charlotte of Prussia

message: Princess Royal Victoria Mary Charlotte was first married to King Alfonso XIII ..Their Marriage was Officiated by Vatican 1 Pope..1903..Princess Royal Victoria Mary Charlotte was named and baptise by chatholic Vatican1 as Maria Christiana or Ena of Spain..
On October 31 1904 -October 31, 1972,Their first child was born Princess Royal Victoria Charlotte "Ena Rosa" wife of King Frederick IX of Romanov and York...
On 1911 Princess Royal Victoria Charlotte separated Alfonso XIII..and converted herself into Presbyterian...WHILE ALFONSO XIII ON 1914 REMARRY..TO COUNTESS BIATRICE ELDEST DAUGHTER PRINCESS ROYAL BIATRICE EUGENIA  ..THEIR MARRIAGE WAS OFFICIATED BY A FILIPINO PRIEST IN INTRAMURUS MANILA AND RECEPTION IN MALACAñANG. THEY BARE THEMSELVES SIX CHILDREN.. A SON FOLLOWED BY FOUR DAUGHTERS AND A STILL BORN SON ALFONSO XIV.  
ON 1936 CROWN PRINCE ALFONSO XIII CHANGES HIS NAME INTO A GERMAN NAME "SCHULTE" AND JOINED THE NAZISM..HE WAS DISOWNED BY HIS FATHER... 
Reff: 1971 UN Tribunal in Vatican II -UN RESOLUTIONS 1971, THE CEDE OF MANILA AND PHILIPPINES BACK TO ROME..VATICAN II DECLARED PRINCESS ROYAL VICTORIA MARY CHARLOTTE OR QUEEN MARIA CHRISTIANA OF SPAIN  [ELDEST DAUGHTER OF EMPEROR FREDERICK III] IS KING ALFONSO XIII LAWFUL WIFE AND HIS DAUGHTER ENA ROSA TO HIS FIRST WIFE CHARLOTTE  WAS A LAWFUL LEGITIMATE DAUGHTER OF KING ALFONSO XIII AND THEIR GRAND CHILDREN AS LEGITIMATE SUCCESSOR.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.245.36 (talk) 10:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What nonsense is this? Why is this insanity allowed on here? 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:3432:BC06:A03F:84D8 (talk) 00:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: NOTICE OF DIS-INFORMATION

message: There are over 10 Friedrichsdof in Germany, the most likely are Friedrichshof, Fahrenwalde, Germany near Prenzlau and Friedrichshof, Heidesee, Germany near Berlin.
Can the author of this page please specify which is the correct location.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.187.202.227 (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it possible to have a photo for the infobox that doesn't have a tumblr watermark? EmilySarah99 (talk) 01:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Photo
Talk:Grant Colburn

message: I have added the deletion tag because this person is not notable. I checked one of his sources (#3) and his name does not appear anywhere in the magazine: https://www.earlymusicamerica.org/files/Notes%20for%20a%20Haydn%20Anniversary.pdf
Regardless, There is nothing notable about this person --Eezurr (talk) 14:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: A tag has been placed on :Grant Colburn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. 
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the .  Eezurr (talk) 14:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Grant Colburn]]
Talk:Carlito Brigante

message: i'm wondering if he would be counted as a tragic hero? Arttic00 23:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I have not red the book After Hours, since it is out of print.  But I have read before that the Lawyer lives at the end of the book, but dies in the movie.  The description here reads exactly as it does in the movie, even though it is described as the story of the book.  Mushrom (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story Description
Talk:John Lamb (congressman)

message: I came to this article, trying to figure out why this congressional election in 1902 was the test case for the voter restrictions in the Virginia Constitution of 1902, which was never submitted for ratification as promised, but took effect anyway. Well, this article doesn't note any problems with his re-election, nor mention any problems with Readjusters or John S. Wise who handled the lawsuits, nor even mention Lamb as being part of the Staples/Martin/Byrd organization. But Virginia history/genealogy libraries are closed or with very restricted hours due to Covid, and I have other responsibilities, so I write this note.Jweaver28 (talk) 01:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  more work needed