lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Central Park jogger case

message: I've added Template:more citations needed and Template:primary sources to the article, since there are a few paragraphs with no references and the article heavily relies on the Ryan affirmation. The latter concern is, I think, less critical, but I want to flag it: The Ryan affirmation is cited roughly 40 times—by far it is the most-cited reference in the article. There are a couple paragraph that rely on it almost to exclusion of everything else—the vacatur section, in my estimation, is particularly too-reliant on the affirmation, since the affirmation is being cited as a source for its own contents—again, not an egregious issue, but I think secondary sources discussing the affirmation could likely be found.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 16:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ryan Affirmation / Citations generally 

message: There appears to be a dispute over whether the main template should say "exonerated" or "vacated". I would argue:
# That nothing should mentioned in the "accused" section of the template—on that point I actually do feel relatively strongly. I can't find other examples where an outcome is paired with "Accused"—and doing so is putting the cart before the horse. I other cases, we don't say "(all found not guilty)" or "(all found guilty)" on comparable pages. The result of the case, including the ultimate vacatur, is discussed in the Verdict section.
# That "vacated" should be the term used. Here, I don't feel particularly strongly, but the technical legal term would be "vacated", and we have reliable sources describing the court as doing just that.
--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template text: Vacated vs. Exonerated 

message: Central Park accused Yusef Salaam is currently a candidate for NYC City Council and should ge4t a new article of his own.  This fact is public recorsd 96.39.242.97 (talk) 01:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yusef Salaam 

message: Even if it wasn't American Justice, l can still recall watching a show on this case before Reyes made his confession. Tnarrud3 (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show about Central Park Jogger
Talk:Adjoint representation

message: I really wouldn't say [Cayley's theorem] has much to do with it. There is no obvious relation, for a group G, between acting on itself by conjugation and by translation - very different permutation representations.
Charles Matthews 06:43, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm coming at this from a robotics/computer-vision perspective. I don't fully follow the Formal Definition section, but it sounds to me like the adjoint representation of a group element, g, Ad(g), is a linear operator that acts on the vector representation of a tangent vector at the origin, s the way g would operate on the matrix representation, S, of the same tangent vector at the origin. That is, 
: S' = g S g^{-1}
is equivalent to
: \mathbf{s}'= \operatorname{Ad}(g) \mathbf{s}
up to representation. My sense is that g S g^{-1} is S parallel transported from the tangent space of the identity to the tangent space of g, and so Ad(g) is doing a similar thing.
Is that even remotely right? Appologies for imprecise lingo. Thanks. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transport of tangent vectors? 

message: I'm confused by the sentence "It follows that the derivative of Ψg at the identity is an automorphism of the Lie algebra \mathfrak g." Which of these is it referring to (abusing notation)?:
# \left.\frac{\partial\Psi_g}{\partial g}\right|_{g=e}
# \left.\frac{\partial\Psi_g(h)}{\partial g}\right|_{g=e}
# \left.\frac{\partial\Psi_g(h)}{\partial h}\right|_{h=e}
It's probably obvious if you understand this more than I do. :-) 15:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derivative at the origin? 

message: If Aut(g) are the automorphism of the Lie algebra g, that is linear operators preserving the Lie brackets, does Ad really associates to any element of G an element of Aut(g)?
Is it possible that this holds only if G is a group of matrices for which holds the nice formula Ad_x (a) = x a x^(-1), (x is in G, a is in g), whilst in the most general situation G is sent by Ad into linear operators g -> g (not Lie bracket preserving)?
I'm probably wrong, it has been a while since i've studied this stuff.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.50.121.192 (talk) 22:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is really Ad : G -> Aut(g) for any Lie group G? 

message: Currently all the examples of adjoint representations in Lie groups are abstract. Can somebody provide a few numerical examples please? This would make the concept a lot easier to understand. Thank you! 23 January 2022  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:413F:9456:1128:6028:14AD:F69 (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numerical Examples 

message: In an introduction section where the words "for example" appear, it would be nice to see an actual example. Like here's a 2x2 matrix and it's adjoint. Look at the example that's given here in the 2nd sentence of the article and note how ridiculous it is. 98.156.185.48 (talk) 10:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another incomprehensible math article
Talk:Goods and Services Tax

message: AFAIK GST is just another name for VAT.  Maybe the term was invented by Roger Douglas in an effort to make his new tax easier to sell, I don't know, but googles for things like 'difference GST VAT' didn't turn up anything useful. 
So, the GST page is now just a redirect to VAT.  
 -- pm67nz
That's not really an acceptable solution for Canada, so I have revived the disambiguation page.
Canadian pages that link to Goods and Services Tax will expect to find the information contained in Goods and Services Tax (Canada) (that is, information about the very Canada-specific political controversy and so forth).  Getting redirected to Value-added tax is confusing and NOT what the person clicking was looking for.
I will go ahead and change any such links to point to the (Canada) page instead, but that won't stop people from going ahead and creating new links in future edits... in nearly all circumstances, such links should NEVER go to the Value-added tax page.
The above applies to Canada, but could just as easily apply to New Zealand and other countries... "Goods and Services Tax" is not just the name of a tax, it's also the shorthand name for a political controversy in most of the countries that adopted it.  In fact, examination shows that all of the "what links here" links pointing to Goods and Services Tax and GST in Canadian (and Australian and New Zealand) pages are politically-oriented and not one was in the context of tax accounting.  The Canadian pages no longer show up because I've edited them all to point to Goods and Services Tax (Canada) and GST (Canada), but no doubt new links will be created in future edits.
P.T. Aufrette 07:28, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Hula, Lebanon

message: The link to houla.org, supposedly the village web site, was listed as suspicious by Google (see diagnostic page for houla.org), and other links in External links section were dead, so I removed the section completely. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 22:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links section removal 

message: , I'm sorry about the reference section. It was unintentional. Be well. Davidbena (talk) 03:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Section
Talk:Bondage cuffs

message: I'm sorry to keep going on about this (see Testicle cuffs), but the words "care must be taken" are simple not NPOV. Wikipedia is not an instruction manual or a health and safety guide. If we are truly NPOV then users will draw their own conclusions. On the Heroin page there is no warning saying "don't take this drug, it's dangerous", we just present the facts and then expect people to use the reference work to make their own minds up. Tompagenet 11:25, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Walter Pitts

message: I found the Talking Nets interview at http://neuron.tuke.sk/~hudecm/txt/.  Since this appears to be an accidental publication, I didn't link it in the article ( 11:40, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interview 

message: JA: The current link to Pat Wall projects to what I'm guessing is a different Pat Wall.  Does anybody have enough info to write a bio for this one?  Jon Awbrey 16:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query: Pat Wall 

message: This article states that Wiener turned against McCulloch on account of his wife Margaret. In the article on Norbert Wiener himself, it is said to be unclear what the reasons for the breakup were. Which is true?
131.155.99.207 08:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Margaret was to blame, but not entirely, because Wiener himself was unstable (due to depression) and at those times prone to being misguided by his wife. You may wish to review the material referenced in the Breakup discussion topic at Talk:Norbert Wiener. (The reasons for the breakup were only recently discovered and published, which is why they were previously unclear.) --Amit 21:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 
Talk:Piccadilly

message: OK, what's supposed to be the most important westerly connection? Lovingboth (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, looking, the A4 article says, with no citation or reason, that the A40 route is more important. But the road to Fishguard being more important than the one to Bristol? The A40 article doesn't claim to be the most important... Lovingboth (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Westway certainly has greater capacity than Piccadilly. I'll try to clarify this in the article. Modest Genius talk 22:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second most important 

message: The picture of roadworks in Piccadilly taken in 2011 is hardly representative of the street, is it? Surely we can find a copyright-free photograph or picture somewhere and delete this one? --Stelmaris (talk) 11:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree but I think I've looked for a better one and couldn't find one. Please go ahead and look yourself on Wikimedia Commons! --TBM10 (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Piccadilly 

message: What's the consensus for these, where a history section spans multiple centuries? I thought the singular was more correct. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Century / centuries 
Talk:Phases of the Holocaust

message: I'm glad that someone has contributed this information, to be sure, but this entry seems to fit into our article on the Holocaust. Maybe this information should be moved to the articles on the Holocaust, and then we can delete this article? Of if someone has ideas for expanding this article, we can keep it as is. RK 13:47, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: The Polish Jews were the first to be exterminated. While they were deported to extermination camps, German Jews were put into the Polish ghettos formerly inhabited by the Polish Jews.
I'd like to see some sources for this. Danny
I don't see any justification for the existence of this article. This information it contains belongs in the Holocaust article. Adam 15:17, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: How about that: When you edit Holocaust, you get the WARNING: This page is 34 kilobytes long. Please consider condensing the page and moving the detail to another article so it is not approaching or in excess of 32KB. Mikkalai 16:25, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Visionist

message: Isn't this supposed to be visionary?
----
This page doesn't make much sense anyway.  "...that sees beyond what is visible to the eyes and brains of human beings."  What is left to see with, exactly...the nose of a dog ?
Even if "They are people with great dreams and minds." applied to all "visionists" (which it certainly doesn't), it's a highly subjective phrase. -- Olathe November 20, 2003
Assumeing that it is meant to be the same as visionary, redirected there. Iainscott 11:02, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Federal grants in the United States

message: Bold textSTOP AND READ THIS MESSAGE.  AN OPPORTUNITY OF A LIFETIME TO GET  $50,000.00 GRANT FROM THE FEDERAL HOME CARE SUPPORT GRANT. 
==Untitled==
This pages confounds grants made by private charities and government funding mechanisms. Should this be split into two pages, there is a lot of stuff that could go on a grants page, especially now that Wikimedia Foundation exists. Alex756 14:16, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: =Split?

message: This pages confounds grants made by private charities and government funding mechanisms. Should this be split into two pages, there is a lot of stuff that could go on a grants page, especially now that Wikimedia Foundation exists. Alex756 14:16, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My business partner and I have been searching for weeks to find grants for small business capital. Does anyone know how we can find a Grant Researcher in the Chicagoland area —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deborahspiegel (talk • contribs) 19:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Business Start-up Grants 

message: I've noticed for the past several months that most of the edits to this article are simply additions to the External Links, followed by reverts, followed by more additions of links, followed by more reverts. Surely we can discuss this and reach an end to this silliness. I'm too busy at the moment to trek through Wikipedia policies at the moment, but I'm sure the article shouldn't be used to promote anything - however I see nothing wrong with awareness. We should discuss a criterion for inclusion in External Links - and how inclusive/exclusive do we wish to be? Pretty much every federal funding opportunity can be found via Grants.gov, so I see no true reasons to include an entire laundry list of URLs to secondary databases - those can be mentioned on the different entities' articles I think.
Furthermore, any grant writers here? I write grants for my university as a graduate assistant. John Shandy` • talk 18:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links controversies - can we reach an end? 

message: Utilities Auto expenses 47.221.92.18 (talk) 17:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senior low income
Talk:Information Processing Language

message: I removed this because it needs some explanation.  It could only be done using an emulator surely?
:The most recent version of IPL still runs, today, on standard PC's.
( 16:08, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

message: it was one of inspirations for lisp : http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/lisp/node2.html ca1 (talk) 07:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  influence 

message: Added the "More citations needed" template because there is just a single in-line citation. Would be great to have someone familiar with the sources help out. Trevor1324 (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only one in-line citation
Talk:Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

message: The current demographic tables are obsolete, see https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2015/05/RLS-08-26-full-report.pdf for demographics and https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2015/11/201.11.03_RLS_II_full_report.pdf for more doctrinal/practical type questions--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 05:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 2014 Lutheran demographic figures

message: Without SIGCOV (and thus failing NCHURCH and GNG), this should not be a stand-alone article. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 02:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Comments: It looks like this merge opinion just petered out. I ran across some confusion and left comments at Talk:Lutheranism#Article issues and classification and think dome merging would be beneficial to Wikipedia and it's readers. --  Otr500 (talk) 08:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Southwestern Washington Synod (ELCA)]] into [[Evangelical Lutheran Church in America]] 

message: This article is listed as having "dated statements" since 2008 and "needing additional references" since 2015, so fails the B-class criteria. Reassess article. --  Otr500 (talk) 08:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, agreement on this reassessment. Thanks for going through these. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Article issues and classification
Talk:Axel Munthe

message: I suggest that somebody, interested in this page, could insert an external link to the following page describing, with pictures, some Axel Munthe’s memories: 
http://himetop.wikidot.com/axel-munthe
I don’t do it myself because I’m also an Administrator of this site (Himetop) and it could be a violation of the Wikipedia Conflict of Interest policy. Thanks for your attention.
Luca Borghi (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible link to Axel Munthe items on “Himetop – The History of medicine topographical database” 

message: Thought that "whimsical" wasn't the best choice of a description for Munthe's style of writing. Substituted "light-hearted" for now, left "dramatic license" alone, with some minor adjustments. Dr. Dan (talk) 21:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Whimsical?
Talk:Jan Brueghel the Elder

message: please check this page for copyright violation. --Keichwa 18:56, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It says here that Brueghal died of cholera, but on the Cholera page it says that the first outbreak of cholera in Europe wasn't until 1816.Kissmaiden (talk) 09:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 
Wikipedia talk:Guide for Everything2 noders

message: I have found some nodes on Everything2 that I'd like to (partially) copy to a WP article.  Is this permissible by copyright?  (I didn't write the E2 content.)  What attribution would I need to use? --bdesham 02:12, Sep 15, 2003 (UTC)
:I don't know, but there are a few notes on this at the Wikipedia:Guide for Everything2 noders. --Camembert
:Short answer: no, you can't copy directly without permission from the original author.  You can use the material on E2 as a reference to write a wikipedia article in your own words.  --Robert Merkel 02:49, 15 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: E2 users own the content they have written and have given no blanket permission to redistribute it beyond the bounds of E2.  If you'd like, contact the user who wrote them, or alternatively as Robert Merkel said, rewrite the facts in your own words. --Morven 03:56, 16 Sep 2003 (UTC)

text: well I think I was wrong.  Most E2 users are indifferetn about copyright, but do fear the idea that their work may be stolen.  Original Research tells me so.  Mathiastck 00:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copying content from E2

message: Everything2 was popular back in the day, but it's clear that Everything2 has evolved very differently from Wikipedia and is much less well known. It also serves a different purpose. I'm gonna tag this as historical per WP:BOLD.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 16:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is perhaps really out of date
Talk:Metatron

message: An edit on August 23, 2019 inserted the following line: “Jesus is the Son of Man and the Ancient of Days is his Almighty Father.”  It inserted this immediately in front of a pre-existing citation   This citation (on page 152) actually says that there is evidence that some Christians depicted Jesus as “The Ancient of Days” from Daniel.  That is not what the Jewish and Islamic traditions being discussed in this context believe at all.  The sentence, perhaps unintentionally, departs from a NPoV and declares a different religious belief correct.  I therefore removed this sentence.
If there is a Christian tradition about Metatron, it would be relevant to discuss Christian beliefs in that context, and to attribute them to a proper source.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6025:63:21e8:c6f2:5599:a149 (talk) 21:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted claim about Jesus 

message: Wouldn't the obvious interpretation about the angel of which God says "my name is in him" be Micha-EL?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.207.16 (talk) 05:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "My name is in him"
Talk:Nils Arne Eggen

message: Way too focused around Rosenborg yet.  Something to remember for later edits:
* Began his football career when he was 15 years old (defence, Orkdal).
* Been playing for Rosenborg and Vålerenga, being the first Norwegian player to win the (Norwegian) Premier Division twice with two different teams.
* Trained numerous clubs, including the Norwegian National Team (both youth, senior and the olympic team).
Anything else?
: Yes, a photo! NuclearFunk 23:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added. Thanks to Thomas Myren/rbkweb.com for the pciture. --Gosub 19:22, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Geoghan

message: Regarding his education: there is, nor was there ever, any such place as Cardinal O'Connell Seminary (though the good Cardinal, whose ego was equivalent to Churchill or FDR may have wished that).  It is my understanding that Goegan  attended St. John's Seminary in Brighton, MA for a time, but was dismissed due to "immaturity" and spent a year at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, and then, due to the influence of an uncle, a monsignor with powerful connections in the Archdiocese of Boston, was reinstated at St. John's, from which he was ordained in whatever year it was.  I will have to dig up some sources on this.  What is important; he was dismissed from the seminary because of "immaturity" and transferred to Holy Cross.  It was only because of powerful family connections that he was allowed back to the seminary and subsequently ordained priest, thus allowing him to embark upon his career of molestation.(Mccarthymichaelp (talk) 23:51, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Doesn't he lose the title "Father" when he is defrocked? --Jiang
:He's still a priest after defrocking, though the defrocking (indeed, just being put on administrative leave) forbids him to identify himself as a priest. But since this covers a period both before and after his defrocking, it's not inappropriate to use it here. -- Someone else 23:35, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Never convicted of rape. He died in prison with case underappeal, but will leave in sexual abuse cat.--FloNight 07:32, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from rape category

message: While he was already in prison for murder, Druce is only notable for the murder John Geoghan and much of the information here is already there. Per WP:NOPAGE I do not believe he merits a standalone article. Star Mississippi 20:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Joseph Druce]] into [[John Geoghan]] 

message: was a film on Showtime about the sex abuse starring Ted Danson and Christopher Plummer. It told the story from the POV of Mitchell Garabedian, the attorney who defeated Cardinal Law. 75.166.4.105 (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Our Fathers