Talk:Armenian–Azerbaijani war (1918–1920)

message: First of, the commander information seems to be accurate. Second, since the massacre of Armenians was much more reported and found in published works, I wonder why you have deleted that from the other editors edit, when the contrary, the reported massacre of Azeris is untouched. Also, you shall explain me why Nakhichevan planed to be part of the Armenian republic is according to Armenian sources, when it was on the middle, between 'Ottoman Armenia' and 'Russian Armenia', with it being considered as part of Russian Armenia. Again, I don't know what the hell you will answer, but I take once again the opportunity to say, that I do not have free times in my handes to be engaged in any disputes involving some ultranationalists. Just saying that so that you do not expect any answers from me. I just had a few minutes and saw what was missing in that article and what was reverted. Fad (ix) 16:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First, I did not write this article. Second, I asked for the information to be supported by reliable sources (not nkr.am or the likes). As long as information is supported by sources, there should be no problems. Grandmaster 06:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop being disrespectful. You already witnessed when I started quoting from primary sources the massacres preparation and the subsequent massacre of Armenians from German records in Baku, while you never did the same with the massacre of Azeris. You have deleted an information which you knew was already documented, while I have seen you defending edits by Baku87, which unlike this were never substanciated. Also, by always dissociating yourself like this claiming you haven't written the article, regardless of your close involvement, you are insulting other editors intelligence. This article  for example, an article which you are very active in, contains in its last section informations and wordings which you were rutlessly fighting for, and again picture you as doing things without concerns of other editors opinion. (in cases, you pretend not understanding what I mean, and play the innocence card. Transfered, remained, all wordings which were discussed for months in the Karabakh article.) By those words, I rest my case, in such situations, I'd normally be cynical toward you, but I won't get in your way, so you may continue thinking that Wikipedia is your battleground, and Armenians your enemy. Fad (ix) 17:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This talk page is for discussion of edits, and not personal beef with other users. If you have enough time to write lengthy posts on talk pages, you should have enough time to add the information you want to the article citing reliable sources. I’m not going to respond to any personal accusations and will seek an admin intervention if you continue to harass me. Grandmaster 08:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK! I see, so I guess the issues above will not be addressed, rather irrelevency, this from someone who is giving lessons on what should be on that talkpage. Fad (ix) 21:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to know where this discussion is going, as it's not supposed to be about Grandmaster... Khoikhoi 02:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But sorry, I thought that while I was away, Grandmaster would have changed, but was I thinking?(sorry for the later sarcasm) This is indeed about the article and Grandmasters claim of not proper sourcing to delete, when he indeed knows that not only was the material he has deleted souced, but much more sourced than his 'injectative' (for the lack of better wording) materials. The sourcing was already done, and this, Grandmaster himself beared witness of, we are not toys here having to do the durty loundery when it has already been done, since Grandmaster happens to pretend amnesia. No one here has Grandmasters free time for this sort of game. Fad (ix) 20:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *sigh* Khoikhoi 21:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grandmaster, it is not nice to delete informations

message: Wheres proof for this? some references please, not to mention it was Armenian before,  there was also Bolshevik before. Artaxiad 23:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I don't understand your objection, if you read the article, in particular the part about "Azeri and Soviet counter-attack, May 1920"  it is quite evident that this war was won by the Azerbaijani side.
The Russian and Azeri offensive started in early June and resulted in quick defeat of Armenian forces. On June 5 the Armenian forces were expelled from Shusha. In early July Armenians withdrew from Tatev and suffered several defeats in Kazakh-Shamshadin area. On 28 July the Soviet forces and their Turkish allies staged an assault on Nakhichevan City, expelling Armenian forces and establishing a joint Russian/Azeri/Turkish occupation of the province. In early August, Armenian troops made one more attempt to take over Nakhichevan but were defeated at Shakh-Takhty by joint Soviet-Turkish corps. Thus, the Azerbaijan SSR was fully restored to the borders of Azerbaijan Democratic Republic prior to Armenian invasion.On August 10 1920, the cease-fire agreement was signed in Yerevan between Soviet and Armenian forces, ending the hostilities and forcing Armenia to recognize the Azeri control of Karabakh and temporary independence of Nakhichevan.
I don't think there is any doubt. If it please you more you can write "Azerbaijani and Russian victory" or "Armenian defeat", but the result doesn't change. (Limonlimone 00:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay but wheres the reference for this? please don't revert if there isn't anything provided. Artaxiad 00:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

text: OKAY, give the source to the exact paragraph your reverts don't seem to impress me YOU shouldn't change anything if you do not have sources confirming this exactly you rather have me remove content or add the citation tag? your not helping at all now reference this material or do not revert its not my job to scroll down to the links, if your going to go on with this go request deletion for citation tags. Artaxiad 02:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azerbaijani victory 

message: I took out the sentence that said "Azerbaijani victory" since there is a citation tag in there for over a month, but there had been no references supporting it. ROOB323 08:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citation 

message: "Strength" should give the number of troops (20,000, 50,000, etc), not the combatants involved, so having Dunsterforce listed there is a non-sequitur. Biruitorul 17:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox issue

message: This article is in a terrible condition. Looks like some users should have read WP:OR.
Why is the Battle of Baku considered part of the Armenian–Azerbaijani War? It took place hundreds of kilometers away from Armenia. The Armenian residents of Baku supported the Allied forces, but that has nothing to do with the Armenian-Azerbaijani war, which took place in Karabakh, Zangezur, Nakhichevan and other border areas. --Երևանցի talk  03:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Baku part of the Armenian–Azerbaijani War?  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Armenian–Azerbaijani War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110310011358/http://www.sakharov-center.ru:80/publications/azrus/az_004.htm to http://www.sakharov-center.ru/publications/azrus/az_004.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927034203/http://www.atlas-of-conflicts.com/areas/armenia-and-karabakh/sov_arm_war1920.php to http://www.atlas-of-conflicts.com/areas/armenia-and-karabakh/sov_arm_war1920.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:56, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The Karabakh Council should be very obviously added to the belligerents section, right under Armenia and Armenian militias. NocheLluviosa (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karabakh Council in belligerents