Talk:Rancho Camulos

message: Color photo scale was added using the coordinates supplied in the article as converted to decimal coordinates. Building appears to be slightly NE of where the Wikimapia crosshairs fall. Ronbo76 17:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the crosshairs are just slightly north of the main adobe, but it's right on the property, so it looks good to me. howcheng  {chat} 18:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geolinks addition 

message: I have passed this as a Good Article, per the GA criteria. All of the concerns I expressed were met. Would consider a peer review for further perspective if you plan to take this article further. Good work and keep it up (at DYK too. :) IvoShandor 09:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS):  
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (inline citations):   c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#: 
#Pass/Fail: 
#:a Well written: 
#:b Factually accurate: 
#:c Broad in coverage: 
#:d NPOV: 
#:e Stable: 
#:f Images: 
#:g Overall: 
If the article failed the nomination, the comments below will help in addressing the problems. Once these tasks are accomplished, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  If you feel that this review is in error, please feel free to take it to a GA review. You can see how I, personally, applied the six criteria above at this link. I sincerely thank you for your work so far.
If your article passed the nomination, congratulations on making Wikipedia all the better. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. If you didn't know there is a groovy user box, , for those users who have significantly contributed to a good article. The "essay" linked above is also how the criteria are applied to passing articles as well. Thanks again for your hard work.
Review by: IvoShandor
 
IvoShandor 10:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Passed

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS):  
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (inline citations):   c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#: 
#Pass/Fail: 
#:a Well written: 
#:b Factually accurate: 
#:c Broad in coverage: 
#:d NPOV: 
#:e Stable: 
#:f Images: 
#:g Overall: 
If the article failed the nomination, the comments below will help in addressing the problems. Once these tasks are accomplished, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  If you feel that this review is in error, please feel free to take it to a GA review. You can see how I, personally, applied the six criteria above at this link. I sincerely thank you for your work so far.
If your article passed the nomination, congratulations on making Wikipedia all the better. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. If you didn't know there is a groovy user box, , for those users who have significantly contributed to a good article. The "essay" linked above is also how the criteria are applied to passing articles as well. Thanks again for your hard work.
Review by: IvoShandor
 
IvoShandor 10:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article review

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Rancho Camulos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080117074820/http://tps.cr.nps.gov:80/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=328688969&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=328688969&ResourceType=Building
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091219002729/http://www.ranchocamulos.org:80/rancho_camulos_history.html to http://ranchocamulos.org/rancho_camulos_history.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091218100150/http://www.ranchocamulos.org:80/index.html to http://ranchocamulos.org/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified