Talk:Not the Nine O'Clock News

message: It would have been interesting to hear from someone who has bought or otherwise seen the DVD, about whether or not the DVD release is simply the same as one or the other of the VHS releases? It sounds like it, from what I'm reading at the review comments on Amazon. Mortene 19:46, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: older entries

message: I am going to move this page to Not the Nine O'clock News (lower case 'C'). This may or may not be the correct way of capitalising o'clock but it is the way it was done:
.. ed g2s • talk 18:39, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've actually moved it back, as per the second link; perhaps in the intervening months the BBC altered it, but the BBC's article uses 'The' (grammatically, it makes a certain amount of sense - the programme is "Not The Nine O'Clock News").-Ashley Pomeroy 11:55, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: Well, it needs a decent lead section and some references.  There is little discussion of the creation of the show, and no mention at all of the first rather unfunny pilot episode (is this the one with the John Cleese sketch mentioned - this page explains is much better).  Pamela's rather groundbreaking role also should be highlighted, and there is no mention of the US spinoff.  There was a recent Comedy Connections with much more detail, including the rather incestuous professional relationships between the actors, but unfortunately nothing here. -- ALoan (Talk) 18:10, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: .  Comments welcome. -- ALoan (Talk) 13:50, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: FARC

message: Was he really the musical director, or is someone getting this mixed up with Radio Active? He was certainly involved with the stage show but I thought Howard Goodall was musical director on the actual series. --Bonalaw 11:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Philip Pope

message: :Image:Notthenine002.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Notthenine002.jpg

message: :Image:Notthenine001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Notthenine001.jpg

message: There were some significant sketches.  For instance I seem to recall seeing one of the Abba members commenting that they were devastated by the Abba spoof, and the Darts sketch is sometimes credited (rather fancifully, I think) with driving the final nail into the coffin of the credibility of Darts as a televised sport.  However the "Memorable sketches" section was simply a collection of cruft, so I've removed it. --Tony Sidaway 19:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't the negative, beer swilling image portrayed in the sketch start a chain of events that resulted in the top players splitting away to start their own, more professionally presented competition (even though they still hold the championship "down the pub" IIRC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.117.197 (talk) 20:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sketches

message: :Image:Not-the-Nine-Oclock-News.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Not-the-Nine-Oclock-News.jpg

message: It should be mentioned that the title derives from other "not the X" parodies, notably "Not the New York Times",
see http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/15/nyregion/15about.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.79.118 (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've always got that slight impression from any retrospective on the series. Any suggestion like that would need a reference to be added to the article, though. I guess it could just be argued that their retrospective careers haven't crossed again, after all Mel Smith has only collaborated with him on the Bean film. Bob talk 17:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the show

message: It is claimed that this is coming out, yet no more information is given. I'd like to see a link to any evidence that this is happening - something which is long over due (the release, not the link). Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.220.6 (talk) 00:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete Box Set

message: This phrase is not clear. What does it mean? DavidFarmbrough (talk) 05:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This left the BBC with sketches which depended upon a second series;" 

message: David Renwick was formerly listed as one of the "main writers", however I have removed this as I can find no evidence for it. He doesn't have any writing credits on any of the LPs (is it really creditable that none of a main writer's contributions would make the cut?) and imdb only lists him as a writer for "unknown episodes". Maybe he contributed one or two items, maybe he wasn't involved at all and somebody added him to imdb in error. Either way, I see no evidence that he was a main writer. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 09:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Renwick 

message: This could really do with some discussion of notable sketches. Any nominations and sources? I think the Two Ninnies sketch in particular is notable, and the Nice Video Shame About The Song sketch is very much a sign of the period. Blythwood (talk) 21:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Also: I've seen a post on a forum citing a shooting script for the Two Ninnies sketch with some cut sections, which I'd love to mention as it has some awesome lines. (Their comedy apparently involves "a lot of actresses in inverted commas and very little else".) Does anyone know if this is real and if so where a reliable source can be found? Blythwood (talk) 21:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a quick Content subsection with at least examples of typical skits, the article definitely needed a feel for what the show was like.  Chris Rodgers (talk) 06:31, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There used to a specific list of "memorable sketches" but it was removed for being overlong as well as subjective.  The danger is that you end up with a list of virtually every sketch ever performed, which would just be far too silly (to quote a different comedy series).  MFlet1 (talk) 13:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable sketches

message: I listened this morning to a Radio 4 Programme called "What was funny about Not the nine o'clock news?". In it John Lloyd said that he was told by "the authorities" not to let Chris Langham continue in the show. He didnt say who "the authorities" were- the BBC?- or why. Is there anything in the sources about this? Spinney Hill (talk) 14:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I listened to that too and wondered what the implication was. There's quite a long segment in that 2009 retrospective documentary (36 mins in, if you find it on YouTube) about Langham being replaced in the series, although this mostly implies that he had some addiction problems and was difficult to work with. In there Lloyd and Hardie admin they were a bit too cowardly to fire him, so left it to John Howard Davies. Hardie says they were "told to sack him" though, so I wonder if that's what that means? Bob talk 18:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Langham 

message: According to this interview of Nigel Planer in 2021, Pam from Pam and the Paperclips is not Pamela Stephenson, so unreleated to NtNON. DavidCane (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Typing Pool'' - Pam and the Paperclips