Talk:Severina (singer)

message: Sysops! please, add cs:severina into article, interwiki is important. THX --Aktron 15:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki 

message: explicit language, undocumented article--Greece666 22:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: It is very obvious that english is not your first language, and it's not your name that gives people that impression, it's your use of english in this article. I will now post every single change you made and show you why they are ALL subjective OR bad uses of english : 
1. You changed reported world wide  - to -  reported worldwidely  . 
If you knew english, you would know that "Worldwidely" IS NOT A WORD !!!! Stop changing it !
2. You changed she was doing all of this  - to -  she had a sexual intercourse .
Several things wrong here; first, "sexual intercourse" is very specificly only 1 kind of sexual act, however severina did MANY kinds of sexual actsin the video, so it would be wrong to only single out the "intercourse" as the only thing she did or the only reason why it was "shocking", because i'm sure even if there was no "intercourse" on the video, as it still had all of the other sexual acts such a oral sex, handjob, etc, it would STILL be "shocking" to the public, so it's not about the "intercourse". Also even if it was, the english again in not correct, you cannot say had "a" sexual intercourse, so again its wrong, so stop changing it !
3. You changed the video was already widely available on the internet. However, while perhaps ruining her religious image.. - to -  the video was already widely available on the internet. However, while the video-tape probably ruined her religious image..
There is NO NEED to say again "video-tape" when it is CLEAR that is what the subject is ! Its just POINTLESS REPETITION and is NOT NEEDED SO STOP CHANGING IT !!
4 You changed ..it actually boosted her career, especially internationally as the story was reported around the world and millions who had never heard of Severina now knew of her.  - to -  ..the negative publicity actually boosted her career, as the story was reported on an international level. 
Changing "it" (meaning the video) to "negative publicity" is not correct as "it" didn't mean publicity, "it" purely meant the video. and also calling news about the tape "negative publicity" is COMPLETELY SUBJECTIVE and has no place on a neutral article such as this. News is (meant to be) neutral, opinion articles can be subjective (negative or positive). 
5. You Removed The new image has so far been successful for her.
When people go through "scandals" and their whole images are DESTROYED, it can mean the end their career. In this case however, Severina has been able to adapt to a different image after the scandal, and this sentence is there to indicate that her career was not distroyed and that she has been able to be successful with a changed image ! Something completely true as she was even representing her country at Eurovision ! So stop changing it !!!
- I-jex 21 may 2006
:your comment on worldwide/world widely is correct, but I do not agree with the rest of your comments.
i wont rv any more. anyone interested look here--Greece666 22:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greece666's BAD and subjective english 

message: I've added an external link to Severina's sex tape twice (and seen it get deleted both times), because it's discussed in the article and is significant enough that I've twice seen it referred to in other material on Severina. Unless there is a policy against linking to porn (and no such policy exists, of course), why isn't this link important to the article? The following is a direct link to the sex video, NSFW: http://www.spankwire.com/articles/29118/Full_Sex_Tape.html
Using any other copy of the whole video would be fine. It's not about this specific source but about linking to the relevant material. --Nick Douglas 08:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This link is inappropriate.  Please see WP:EL and WP:SPAM.  The site requires proprietary browser plugins (flash) and is a commercial site.  --Yamla 15:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, fair enough, thanks. --Nick Douglas 02:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  What if the video is on www.pornotube.com then? Could it be linked there? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.212.204.24 (talk) 00:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sex Tape 

message: Any clinical description of the contents of the sex tape, which was presumably never intended for public release, appears to be a violation of the Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons, which states (under Presumption in favor of privacy):
"An important rule of thumb when writing biographical material about living persons is "do no harm". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid, and as such it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. BLPs must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy."128.218.20.69 (talk) 07:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: sex tape discussion 

message: Severina is a Croatian singer, but due to similarity in languages and cultural ties, her fame exceeds Croatian borders as she is one of major pop stars in all neighboring ex-Yugoslavian countries: Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia. I consider it relevant, since she is not just a local celebrity (like many), but a regional one (and wider). 109.93.245.201 (talk) 12:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeland and range of fame/popularity 

message: The song "Prevara" is a plagiarism of the song "Na sen" by Polish singer Urszula.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urszula_Kasprzak
* https://www.facebook.com/urszula.kasprzak/posts/909641542387373
89.167.107.212 (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Severina (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121022050859/http://www.jutarnji.hr/cak-tri-premijere-glembajevih-u-rijeckom-hnk/210487/ to http://www.jutarnji.hr/cak-tri-premijere-glembajevih-u-rijeckom-hnk/210487/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130520075913/http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/99437/severina-tito-nove-jugoslavije to http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/99437/severina-tito-nove-jugoslavije
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130107173448/http://www.gloria.com.hr/vijesti/showpage.php?id=20664 to http://www.gloria.com.hr/vijesti/showpage.php?id=20664
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified