Talk:Colonial Pipeline

message: Little confusing that we have a "History timeline" and a separate "Spill history" section. Anyone else feel like these could be merged and/or re-organized? NickCT (talk) 18:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As a first step, I moved "Spill history" up in the article, and shortened the company "History timeline" by combining sentences into paragraphs. Given the short tenure of many presidents of the company, I wonder if this is really useful information here. None is discussed as being influential to operations. I'm a little concerned about combining the two sections and dispersing the spills among company policies and presidents. There is little in the company history as given that seems to relate to the spills or efforts to prevent them, except minor mention of uses of technology - but nothing about the results of such technology. I think we may question relying so much on one source - the book that is the company history - for all this company history material. Perhaps the company history section should be approached from the standpoint of seeing it there are other sources for that content.Parkwells (talk) 14:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Secondly, I added the EPA complaint and landmark settlement in 2003 with Colonial under the Clean Water Act to the section on "Safety and environmental record." It is interesting that the API awarded Colonial for four years in a row during the period of some of its worst spills and EPA filing the civil complaint against them. The landmark 2003 settlement was reached after the last of these awards in 2002. I added the EPA case to the Lead, as Colonial paid the largest civil penalty in the history of these cases.Parkwells (talk) 14:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resection 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Colonial Pipeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003074825/http://www.colpipe.com:80/ab_faq.asp to http://www.colpipe.com/ab_faq.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001045927/http://www.colpipe.com:80/sv_iht.asp to http://www.colpipe.com/sv_iht.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121116100812/http://www.colpipe.com/pdfs/cplmansec3-102912.pdf to http://www.colpipe.com/pdfs/cplmansec3-102912.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121009215739/http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/recletters/1972/P72_1_7.pdf to http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/recletters/1972/p72_1_7.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102151653/http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/safetystudies/sir9604.pdf to http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/safetystudies/sir9604.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628185710/http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/cwa/colonialfs.pdf to http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/cwa/colonialfs.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121007135920/http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/1998/PAR9801.pdf to http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/1998/PAR9801.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130503174424/http://www.colpipe.com:80/press_release/pr_116.asp to http://www.colpipe.com/press_release/pr_116.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified