lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mairead inghean Eachainn

message: Gaelic for Daughter of is NIGHEAN not inghean.... typo????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liamcrouse1 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe Nighean is a dialectical "corruption", not in use historically. "Inghean" is what they used then, and what historians seem to use now . Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 15:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So according to historian Angus Mackay, the wife of the Wolf of Badenoch was Mariota Mackay, daughter of Iye Mackay, 4th of Strathnaver, and that she was the mother of the Wolf's children: See source: . Can anyone clarify this ? QuintusPetillius (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems that Angus Mackay wasn't certain. He wrote that he was "strongly inclined to believe" that the filia Athyn given by the Moray Register refers to a daughter of Iye Mackay. GWS Barrow, in Scotland and Its Neighbours in the Middle Ages (p115), stated that Athyn is a mistake for Achyn. Mairead's name elsewhere appears as Mariette Enyenachyn, with the latter word meaning inghean Eachainn (daughter of Eachann). So it seems that Angus Mackay guessed wrong. See here for another old secondary source, The Battle of Harlaw by William Mackay (pp19-20), which also points out that Athyn is incorrect.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

text: Well maybe we could add to the article that there is a source (Angus Mackay) who says that she was daughter of the Mackay chief and also that William Mackay states that the Moray register correctly transcribed would be daughter of Hector. Nothing here seems to be certain so we could update the article to give the various versions by different sources. QuintusPetillius (talk) 10:28, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added Angus Mackay's theory in a note. It doesn't appear to have been followed in modern scholarship. The reason for this could be that the evidence for it was quashed by William Mackay almost a century ago (Barrow gives the year 1911, but the book he seems to be referring to was published in 1922). In The Wolf of Badenoch, Alexander Grant stated in a note that "[t]here is no evidence for the identification in Scots Peerage vii, 159, of Eachann with Iye Mackey of Strathnaver" (Scots Peerage cites Angus Mackay for the claim). Steve Boardman stated in Lordship in the North-East that the identity of Mairead's family is unknown, whilst Barrow identifies her merely as a Gaelic-speaking Highlander.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Mariota Mackay
Talk:The Sound of Petula

message: Thanks for uploading or contributing to :Image:SoundOfPetula.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 23:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:SoundOfPetula.JPG]]
Talk:Saw Ba U Gyi

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.myhero.com/go/hero.asp?hero=B_Gyi_madison_hs_2009_ul. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 22:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The editors of this article seam to have sympathies with the Karen autonomy movement that Saw Ba U Gyi was a promoter of. All the sources come from websites with similar sympathies and continuously describe and portray the subject of this article as a hero. The article on Bo Mya, another Karen leader is significantly more factual and balanced in its content, and this article should be too. Much more could definitely be added to this article without such a strong taste of Karen nationalism. Thank You.Inter&anthro (talk) 22:56, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality?
Talk:Marvel Legends Showdown

message: contact me please.
ICQ: 325-652-160
or e-mail: kurt_wagner@mail.ru
i've added something here too.
Kurt Wagner.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Otchenashenko (talk • contribs) 08:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  For those, who made changes here. 

message: the links for Wolverine are for the animal not the comic character. im not sure how to change this so some one that knows how should do this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.149.162.90 (talk) 18:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong links.
Talk:List of A Haunting episodes

message: Last episodes I've watched have been rated 18+ can anyone verify? --156.34.90.77 16:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PG? 

message: ...like that. Sometimes the ghostly entities and/or demons are far too powerful for laymen to throw out. 205.240.146.37 (talk) 20:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not always....

message: The "true stories" featured in the serial might not be hoax but they might be result of group or family together drifting into their fantasy they have created...most of the episodes feature a family which faces the haunting...family members share a common world view and this may help in weaving a ghostly story around easily explainable physical events...
...and with help of para-psychologists(who puport to be real psychologists which they are not)and preists(whose world view exclusively focusses on devils and gods)the ghostly story is provided with anchor and a base..as wall as so called proofs that haunting was real  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.48.48 (talk) 22:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Opinions towards the factual accuracy of the show's events are not valid enough to merit a "dispute" tag atop this article. That tag is only reserved if the article has blatantly incorrect information, ex claiming all the episodes are based of plots from Ghost Busters or Anastasia (1997 film). The producers' claims that show is composed of "true stories" is explained in the main article. These accounts are taken directly from people, who claim they are true - leaving the audience to decide whether they are true or false. In essence, claiming they are "true stories" is an attempt to further sell the series (see producers comments). --  StarScream1007  ►Talk   23:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Real Possibility
Talk:Heaven and Earth Show

message: The BBC and Virgin have it as 'Heaven and Earth', not H&E with Gloria Hunniford, I would consider 'with Gloria Hunniford' a sort of subtitle, so will remove that bit. Will Bradshaw 09:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was no move at this time. Given the WP:NC and the fact that the show's official website (BBC) isn't consistent on what it calls the show, there is not enough evidence to support a move at this time. JPG-GR (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Agreed, "The Heaven and Earth Show" was tht show's name. Therefore it should be that. (Midnightblueowl (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Homes Under the Hammer

message: Graham Barnfield is not the presenter of this show. An IMDB search shows he made one guest appearance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.147.181 (talk) 00:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Presenters

message: I feel this section reads like someone who wanted to name all their favourite artists. The Whole paragraph could be explained in 3 lines, the section adds little or no value and isn't a defining feature of this property program.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.6.215.1 (talk) 09:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't agree more. Sorry about the four year wait to get rid of it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Music
Talk:The Invisible Man (1984 TV series)

message: I've removed the following section from the article:
::Key differences from the original text
::Although the plotline of the serial is extremely close to that of Wells' original text, there are several key differences:
::* The novel's storyline takes place over a period of several months, beginning in mid-winter and ending in early spring. The serial reduces the timespan to only one month, and the whole story takes place in mid-summer. According to the scriptwriter James Andrew Hall this was done to emphasize the unusual nature of the Invisible Man's initial appearance, appearing completely wrapped up in spite of the summer heat.
::* The village of Iping is actually situated on the border between Sussex and Kent, which was also the case in Wells' novel, but in the serial the village is relocated to the border between Somerset and Devon.
::* An extra character is inserted into the flashback sequence in the form of Griffin's college professor, Professor Hobbema, whom the writer created for a scene in which Griffin expounds his notions of invisibility.
::* Although the character of Dr. Kemp first appears at the halfway point, as in the book, the serial introduces the character at a much earlier point in a scene at the inn in which Griffin reads a paper on optical density written by Kemp and realizes he is the same man he once worked with. This was done to reduce the level of coincidence at the point in which Griffin takes refuge in Kemp's house- in the novel he is unaware that the house belongs to Kemp and stumbles into the house purely by chance.
::* The epilogue sequence at the narrative's end is slightly different from the book. In the book, Thomas Marvel is revealed to have been allowed to keep the money stolen by the Invisible Man and used it to set up his own pub- itself named The Invisible Man- in which he tells customers the story of his encounter with Griffin by day, then ponders over the Invisible Man's hidden journals by night. Yet in the final scene of the serial, Marvel is still a vagrant and is shown reading Griffin's journals out in the country, conducting an imaginary conversation with a scarecrow that resembles the bandaged Invisible Man.
Unless these observations are made by a reliable source, we cannot include them. To include our own observations about the differences is the very definition of original research. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section
Talk:Nenagh railway station

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster  (What now?) 01:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Cloughjordan railway station

message: The overbridge in the picture looks capable of taking two tracks, but there is only one track now.  What happened?    Tabletop (talk) 08:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double or Single 
Talk:Rudolph T. Randa

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Rudolph Thomas Randa was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--TommyBoy (talk) 21:20, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: In 2015, Randa gave probation with no jail time to a Milwaukee man charged with 55 counts of buying firearms with fake identification and dealing them without a license. "People kill people," U.S. District Rudolph Randa said, echoing a common gun rights slogan. "Guns don't kill people." [Judge repeats gun rights slogan during sentencing for illegal buys
By Nicholas Erickson of the Milwaukee - Wisconsin Journal Sentinel Aug. 19, 2015]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georoses (talk • contribs) 03:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: A link to the above referenced article is: http://archive.jsonline.com/news/crime/milwaukee-man-to-be-sentenced-on-gun-fraud-charge-b99560011z1-322283481.html/ --TGC55 (talk) 12:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentence
Talk:Ad libitum

message: (Shrug) Dysprosia, I'll let it be, certainly not worth an edit war, but my dictionary (American Heritage 3rd and 4th editions) lists the two terms under separate entries; that is, I still think they are two different terms, not two different forms of the same term. 
I don't think they should be separate articles—including both in the same article seems sensible to me. But I still believe the article should be arranged something like this:
:Ad lib and Ad-lib are related but distinct terms. Both are abbreviations of ad libitum which is Latin for "at liberty."
:Ad lib, without a hyphen, is an adverb meaning "at choice"
:Ad-lib, with a hyphen, the commoner term, is a noun or verb meaning...
::My dictionary says them under two different terms too, but the differences between the two definitions are rather negligible, boiling down to the distinction between "ad lib" being the adj/adv term, while "ad-lib" being the noun term. What do you feel is the main distinction between the two? Dysprosia 04:56, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Collins English Dictionary lists 'ad-lib' as verb, adjective and 'ad lib' as noun, adverb. 
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ad-lib lists 'ad-lib as verb, adjective and 'ad lib' as adverb and neither as noun, which brings the reliability of that source into question.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ad+lib lists 'ad-lib' as verb, adjective and 'ad lib' as noun, adverb.
===Examples?===
I wonder if we should add a few examples of well-known ad libs in film and TV by way of illustration? 23skidoo 20:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content copied over from [[Talk:Ad lib]]

message: I wonder if we should add a few examples of well-known ad libs in film and TV by way of illustration? 23skidoo 20:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples?

message: The result was merge.  I've now done it: all substantial content from the ad lib page is integrated into this one, including the grammar; and I've added a redirect hatnote for people who want the sound card etc.  Talk pages merged as well.  Hope the result is satisfactory.  -- simxp (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please continue at Talk:Ad libitum#Merge perposal, Ad lib + Ad libitum.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewlyahoocom (talk • contribs) 17:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I couldn't agree more. Ewlyahoocom 17:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Should Ad lib and Ad libitum be merged? It seems confusing that they are on 2 pages. --apers0n 14:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please continue at Talk:Ad libitum#Merge perposal, Ad lib + Ad libitum.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewlyahoocom (talk • contribs) 17:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion from Ad Lib

message: From Talk:Ad lib#Ad libitum: Should Ad lib and Ad libitum be merged? It seems confusing that they are on 2 pages. --apers0n 14:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't agree more. Ewlyahoocom 17:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion from Ad Libitum
Talk:Staples Corner

message: Anyone know if the presence of the Staples office supply company outlet is pure coincidence, clever marketing, or some mix of both? I’d not known about the previous mattress factory mentioned in the article, so are the two related in any way? Whatever the reason it might be worth pointing out that present business on the site of that name is not the reason that the corner got its name. Jock123 (talk) 15:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As already stated in the article, "Staples Corner is named after the Staples Mattress factory, which was at the road junction from 1926 to 1986". That Staples the stationers has a store nearby is pure coincidence—they're an American firm which took over the English chain Office World a few years ago and renamed all their stores to the Staples brand, including the one at Staples Corner. ‑ iridescent 16:10, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staples at Staples Corner…
Talk:Heavy Weather (film)

message: Much of this article seems to have little or nothing to do with this production of Heavy Weather.  Major cleanup is in order and unless there is some objection, I will go at it with a weed whacker at some point. Rhindle The Red (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he/she is quite correct - this reads like an amateur essay by a wannabe TV critic, rambling on about stuff that's got nothing to do with the topic. This is an encyclopedia article, you know. I'm whacking away! - DavidWBrooks (talk)
Well, actually, I think you've done quite a good job, keeping most of the useful stuff. Sentorian (talk) 06:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not arguing that the information isn't valid, just that it doesn't belong here, on a page about this specific TV adaptation.  Anything not already at Blandings Castle needs to move there and the entire "Blandings on film and television" section needs to go.  If you can't make a case for what this section has to do with the *topic at hand*, I will cut it. Rhindle The Red (talk) 14:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of this article

message: Shouldn't it be "Heavy Weather (TV film)"? --STUART (talk) 17:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:TV Hell

message: I've deleted this claim, as it is demonstrably false. BBC2's A Perfect Christmas in December 1991 featured five hours of vintage festive programming (complete programmes and compilations) in one evening. A Night in With Alan Bennett in early 1992 was similar, with new links by the writer himself. It could also be argued that Channel 4's TV Heaven in Feb-Apr 1992 was a series of theme nights (each theme being a specific year), which of course was undoubtedly the trigger to BBC2 doing TV Hell'. Nick Cooper (talk) 08:57, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First UK "theme night"
Talk:Henry Swoboda

message: world premiere recordings of Dvorak's 3rd and 4th symphonies (then unnumbered and referred to as E-flat (1872) and D minor "op.posth"), I think, in 1950 on Westminster. Not sure? Schissel | Sound the Note! 19:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also made the
Talk:A201 road

message: I have removed the claim that it was "built during the construction of the Metropolitan Line" - aside from the short stretch between Kings X & Farringdon, this road is nowhere near the Metropolitan Line (and for much of it's length on the other side of the river!) —  iridescent (talk to me!) 17:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Navigation

message: The nav template has been redesigned with new subheadings and show/hide functionality. This seems to be a good improvement and consolidates some other older nav templates in the project. One nitpick is the section "Editing Tips", which has a mish mash of items including several items that should probably be under a separate "Guidelines" section. The tips section should then probably be renamed "Editing Resources" or similar, and should probably include a couple other pages (i.e. the resources page). I'd make these changes myself, but the new design uses more complex coding that I'm not familiar with and don't want to mess up. -- LJ ↗ 07:44, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some comments to the template, which hopefully explain things a little better.  Really though, it's just seven collapsible tables stacked on top of each other.  The trickiest part is the switch at the beginning of each section telling it when to be open.  If I were to add in another section, I'd simply copy and paste one section, add in the other pages, and then add the full page names to the switch.  —Fredddie™ 11:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll take a look later on, thanks for doing that. I'm not versed in the wiki coding, and didn't understand what the switch did. -- LJ ↗ 19:15, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  subheadings
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Resources/Lengths

message: Indiana has revised its Reference Post Manual this year. However, it specifically states in the intro, with explanation,
THERE ARE ERRORS, MISTAKES AND OMMISSIONS WITHIN THIS BOOK!
[I guess that covers them for misspelling "omissions", huh?]
So do we go with 2015, even though they pretty much admit that it's not a RS themselves, or with 2004, even though it's older and lacks anything changed since then? Mapsax (talk) 14:22, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indiana data updated