lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:George of the Jungle (2007 TV series)

message: Someone needs to seriously fix the page so the text isn't running into the box on the right. I would do it but I'm unsure how. Jsager75 (talk) 01:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text running into the box 

message: Who is Carl?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.150.117.10 (talk) 04:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carl 

message: The article needs serious improvement. Check out what I deleted in the main characters section:
*Larry: One of George's couisin.
Some guy thought he was a main character just because he's in one episode! I am not vandalizing, just clarifying the article and deleting an unnecessary one-time character. Pokemon Buffy Titan (talk) 01:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Is Going On? 

message: Is George of the Jungle over? I haven't seen new episodes since summer last year. 96.250.240.155 (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's back. Please go to BCDB and / or IMDB for further discussion. In Correct (talk) 03:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Over?

message: This series was never co-production of Cartoon Network Studios and Warner Bros. Animation, please fix this.--OliverDF (talk) 16:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  HEY GUYS 

message: The revival series features numerous changes to the characters in terms of their names, designs and voices, and music and story arc structure to make the show more similar to the 1967 version.
No it doesn't. I have not watched this version of George (and I do not want to) but I can tell from the images of Season 1 and Season 2 that all they did was change his hair. The characters have 8 fingers in this version, while the original 1967 version has 10. This is most certainly nothing like the 1967 version. Somebody please clarify this before I delete it. In Correct (talk) 03:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  It Does Not Look Similar At All 

message: this section has been seriously hacked or vandalized or something. PurpleChez (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: There are more seasons to run on this, please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.252.240.170 (talk) 22:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More seasons of this should be run.
Talk:Shevchenko

message: "Shvets" is a tailor, not a shoemaker. The word for shoemaker is "chobotar". --Vs1969 (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To me, a tailor is kravets’, a shoemaker shvets’.  Perhaps there's a regional difference? —Michael Z. 2008-12-10 17:21 z
Agreed, a lapse of memory, sorry. Changed it back. --Vs1969 (talk) 18:10, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:World War II minesweepers of New Zealand

message: The name of this category, Royal New Zealand Navy World War II minesweepers, does not conform to Wikipedia country-specific naming conventions. The country should come last. A better name would be World War II minesweepers of New Zealand. However I don't know how to rename categories! --Geronimo20 (talk) 01:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming this category
Talk:Rod Fong

message: This candidate is not in fact specifically referenced in the article, and further information regarding this individual, beyond his candidacy will be added.  He is a well-regarded lawyer in Alberta, is on several Boards and should merit some mention in wiki.
*I agree, but the initial entry was lacking in content.  Looking better.  You cna remove the construction template once it's expanded.  Have fun! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:UMBI (disambiguation)#Requested move 23 August 2018.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:UMBI (disambiguation)#Requested move 23 August 2018]]
Talk:Sojourner–Douglass College

message: I recently added information to this article regarding its well-documented accreditation and financial woes; in brief, the institution has been struggling for several years and its regional accreditor has placed been critical with its most recent action to place the college on "show cause" status which is its most serious warning status.  A new editor reverted those additions without any discussion or edit summary and didn't respond to my questions on his or her Talk page asking for an explanation.  I've reinserted the information since (a) the other editor has refused to discuss his or her concerns, (b) the citations are reliable (and many more could be provided if necessary), and (c) this information is indisputably important to help readers understand this college.
I caution other editors who delete without discussion well-sourced and important information from this or any other article that such actions quickly stretch the bounds of good faith and continued actions along those lines will probably lead to a block.  We welcome your concerns and participation but editing a Wikipedia article solely to promote your point of view is unacceptable.  ElKevbo (talk) 00:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accreditation and financial woes
Talk:Hello Destiny...

message: why do you people label this as punk rock? i did hear it would be ska punk, but if you want it to say punk rock find a source since i didnt hear that anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.65.47 (talk) 20:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punk rock 

message: Someone is hard trolling in here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiohsilva100 (talk • contribs) 06:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Manson?
File talk:Butterfly panama.jpg

message: This image was originally upsampled by a factor of 8, i.e. blocks of 64 pixels all the same colour. I sampled it back down. Samsara (talk • contribs) 02:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake. It was just really bad compression artefacts. Make of that what you will. Samsara (talk • contribs) 02:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Shifen Waterfall

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:ShiFengWaterFall 002.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 2, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-09-02. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:45, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:ShiFengWaterFall 002.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Boucher Manufacturing Company

message: :rationale for 'mid' importance: the size of the company was small compared to "the Big 4", but an actual company size is not yet indicated; also, the company has a significant historical position in the toy train market --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article contains a history that was fixed after a cut-and-paste page move. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article history
Talk:Christian books

message: The notability page says "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." I believe that Chrisitan bookstores such as Parable and Family Life store and Koorong which solely survive on selling Christian books indicate that it is of notability. I cannot find the source on Wikipedia which indicates there must be enough physical difference for an article to be notable. For instance, there are various lines of philosophical thought which have no physical difference, but yet they are notable. I believe that Christian print is a subsidiary of print, thus should be separated from print and discussed in it's own right.
Vividenblem (talk) 02:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Climate of Pennsylvania

message: I believe this page is very useful. Janiken (talk) 02:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It will be.  It started as a copy and paste job from the Pennsylvania article.  More information will be added as time allows. Thegreatdr (talk) 04:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Usefulness of page

message: A section is titled "Government spending related to presumed climate change in Pennsylvania". Why "presumed"? Is this some other climate change nor related to actual climate change?--81.39.184.51 (talk) 10:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: presumed climate change

message: Hello.  While working on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Citation_cleanup#Pages_with_duplicate_reference_names, I noticed that this article is somewhat unusual (the same issue exists with Climate of New England and surely others).  They include templates which themselves include citations, and merged together the duplicates clash.  It appears that to properly fix this, either tag names of every included template would need to have a template-specific prefix or suffix, or possibly better, all the templates should include another template to hold the common citations, like is often done for census data of countries.  On the other hand, this does not appear to be urgent as it does not break functionality.  But it raises automatic citation warnings and puts the articles into special maintenance categories which are visible to those working on cleanup Wikiprojects (i.e. these show up at :Category:Pages_with_duplicate_reference_names).  Thanks, PaleoNeonate (talk) 17:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate citation reference tags 
Talk:Siemens DCO

message: Information I added was from first-hand experience working at Stromberg-Carlson and later Siemens Stromberg-Carlson (after the sale).  I worked at the Lake Mary facility and was sent to NY for a few weeks after Siemens purchased the company to learn the EWSD before its production was moved to Florida. How do I certify the information I added when it was not found online?Mrhyak (talk) 02:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, a lot of us old timers lived through much more history than we can document.  The usual answer is, such material from memory is simply let slide, except for the "unsourced" tag at the top of the article.  If someone disagrees, we discuss it in the talk page, and if they've got a proper source then they're the winners.  Incidentally you may want to check the article for redundancy.  Jim.henderson (talk) 00:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced
Talk:North Quay, Brisbane

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:List of national anthem performers at the Super Bowl

message: The page needs protection from unregistered users. Someone vandalized the page and listed some guy as the singer for Super Bowl XV. Who the hell is Wyatt Metty? That's right, he's a figment of someone's imagination. Let's get it together and stop the crap. DavidSteinle (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs protection 
Talk:Glen Echo, Maryland

message: flag needs to be added Conrad Hirtzfish (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  flag
Talk:Dupuit–Forchheimer assumption

message: In the article, shouldn't the parenthetical comment "(i.e., the equipotential lines are vertical)" instead say "(i.e., the equipotential lines are horizontal):"?  Am I missing something?
Dannya222 (talk) 02:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Vertical equipotentials are correct. Equipotentials are always perpendicular to the flow direction, so if the flow is horizontal, then equipotentials are vertical. Take a look here for figures showing this (I found this link from random searching—although these figures aren't intended to show the Dupuit assumption). +mt 03:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point - thanks for clearing that up. Dannya222 (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Axum (disambiguation)

message: Has anyone ever heard of the musician Axum II...perhaps techno or world music? --In Defense of the Artist (talk) 02:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Entries are now:
*Axum (programming language), a programming language from Microsoft
*Axum, computer graphing and data analysis software
Is this a duplicate?
The second entry doesn't fo anywhre.
84.210.46.118 (talk) 20:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fashion/Collaboration of the Month

message: Is anyone interested in starting the Collaboration of the Month? Here are some article ideas:
*Dress
*Jacket
*Blouse
*Footwear
*Hairstyle
*Pattern (sewing)
These are all Top-importance, Start-class articles. 
Pinging Iviave, who asked to be contacted "if any new ideas come forward" for this CotM. Chickadee46 (talk) 03:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks! I'm not quite sure how to do the actual technical work of getting a page into the position of CotM. I checked the WP:TAFI page but their process seems a bit too drawn-out for a project that doesn't have many editors interested. Any suggestions? Chickadee46 (talk) 02:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not trying to be pushy, but just in case Mabalu isn't watching this, I'm pinging them: 
I've boldly put Jacket in for the July 2016 CotM. It's Top-importance, Start-class, and requested on the to-do list. Chickadee46 (talk|contribs) 20:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I feel very bad about this - I haven't really had much time in which to dedicate to editing, so I'm afraid this kind of went nowhere. Sorry. :( Mabalu (talk) 20:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Apology accepted  Chickadee46 (talk|contribs) (WP:MCW) 21:08, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting the CotM?
Talk:Project Manhigh

message: :The project started in December of 1955 to study the effects of cosmic rays on humans.
So, can anybody contribute the answer to the article?  Currently there's no content regarding the results of the project. Tempshill (talk) 03:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Results?

message: I personally prefer the metric system... but as this was a US project conducted by US engineers, it's likely that it was performed using the US system (or Imperial, or whatever). I say this also because I was adding in the  templates, but, when I went to do the three bulletted missions, I found that the feet measurements have more significant digits than the meters. This makes me think that the foot measurements should come first. But, then I'd have to change the whole article, for consistency.
And, now the thunderstorm here is gonna knock out my power lines. Gotta go, again!! — gogobera (talk) 19:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meters?
Talk:Amyzon (city)

message: I wrote this all at a go, instead of saving every other sentence to inflate my edit history. If you think you might feel like challenging the text as violating a copyright, because you've seen it at one of Wikipedia's many mirrors, do check right now before it's picked up, rather than later, won't you? That would save me the struggle of explaining. I only wrote this to fix a redlink at Bagadates I, which I was tuning up to concert pitch. Thank you.--Wetman (talk) 03:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello there! before you challenge this as "copyright violation"
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather/Newsletter/Archive 1

message: Just say if I am getting to long with my writing, I have a tendency to do that. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 03:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: Same as WP:NTROP? Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 03:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delivery
Talk:Sanguine

message: Looks like just a definition, should probably be transwikied.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For now that's about all it is, but red chalk has seen a lot of use in drawing; some editor(s) with a good grasp of art history could make an article out of this. __Just plain Bill (talk) 06:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Thomas Lessman

message: At least one of the people requesting deletion, Hackney, seems to have a personal vendetta going on with this deletion request. On his own talk page, in a discussion with Flamarande, he notes that if I hadn't been determined to keep the section about my work on Wikipedia history articles, he wouldn't have nominated the article for AFD.
The article has been up for two years, and there hasn't been a problem until now? Seems a little fishy to me... Thomas Lessman (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Either that, or I didn't notice the article till today. That'll teach you not to draw attention to yourself won't it? One Night In Hackney303 03:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And if Hackney hadn't nominated it, I would have. And I came past the article as a result of the discussion about your behaviour on the admin noticeboard. Spartaz Humbug! 09:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ditto. KillerChihuahua?!? 14:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I do wonder if 65.12.222.200 hasn't also voted as 66.176.106.94, similar locations and similar beliefs and the person likely to be 66.176.106.94 has a notorious reputation of foul play in afds. Thanks, SqueakBox 16:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Foul Play?

message: There is absolutely NO reason any of you should be deleting ANYone's comments. Especially if it is a wikipedian that you have a history of harassing them and removing their edits! I don't know who "Rex Judicata" or 66.whatever, or CIA1234whatever are, but I do know who AGWiii is, and he's a Professor at a University. I've known him for years. I've seen the work of certain pro-Deleters here in hounding AGWiii and the other usernames that have had their comments deleted. Whether you liked their comments or not, deleting them or censoring comments you don't like definitely implicate the deleters in a conflict of interests of their own. Especially when you stalk those users everywhere they go on Wikipedia, bullying them and deleting their comments and legitimate contributions.
Their arguments illustrated their belief, similar to mine, that many of the people arguing FOR deletion are doing so, not because of the merits of the article, but because they don't like the subject matter or they don't like the editors who created or contributed to the article. A good case in point is the editor who insists this is only a "vanity article", and has vehemently demanded it be deleted, even going as far as trying to sabatoge efforts to improve the article so that it meets the criteria to keep. Thomas Lessman (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki-Bullying and Stalking
Talk:List of Texas state prisons

message: As all the other states have a similar page, and it makes it easier to find an article - or see one that needs to be created - please do not delete this article. SGT141 (talk) 03:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * List of TDCJ prisons in Wikidata: <https://w.wiki/Hap>. -- M2545 (talk) 13:54, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikidata list
Talk:Jaycees

message: <H1>Jaycees -> JCI, not USJCs</H1>
Once the Junior Chamber International article has more information in it, future redirects from the word "Jaycees" need to go to it, instead of the United States Junior Chamber website. Dagordon01 (talk) 03:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was completely unaware that user:Netmonger implemented this redirect but I definitely challenge it and am reverting. Not only has the condition ("more information") suggested by user:Dagordon01 not happened but much more importantly the redirect is inappropriate. The US Jaycees was the original organization and JCI is the child of the US Jaycees. Seven years after JCI was formed the USJC organization voted to formally use the name "Jaycees" but to the best of my knowledge the "Junior Chamber International" never formally adopted that name in their bylaws. Even if they did it was after USJC made the change. I will gladly put a DAB link at the top of both articles to ensure readers can find the article they want but Jaycees should point to the founding organization's article. Low Sea (talk) 11:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Ruth Fowler (writer)

message: Ruth clearly wants a mention of "screenwriting" in the article, but the only reliable evidence of this is amateur . She claims other stuff in her CV  but there is no detail, and I am not sure whether this is an appropriate reliable reference. If the claim that Ruth is a screenwriter is to stay in the article, we need a reference; which one? I have removed the claim in the meantime. (In any case, it must be clear that wikipedia is not a place to advertise oneself as a screenwriter.) 87.112.0.95 (talk) 11:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screen writing.
Talk:Brit funk

message: ....so i'm doing my best to remedy that - please feel free to join in!
Good page. There's nothing wrong with it at all. It's the most accurate page I have seen so far pertaining to British Soul. Other pages are riddled with inaccuracies and some are completely false to put it politely. God knows who's writing this nonsense. I will see what I can do to help.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrysallfunk (talk • contribs) 23:51, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  this page is pretty awful......
Talk:List of trolley bus systems in Canada

message: This page cites more trolley bus systems for Saskatchewan, but even this page is not complete, but the citation page is more complete if you check the references.SriMesh | talk 03:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Transportation in Saskatchewan]]

message: The only Canadian spelling is "trolley bus" according to the Canadian Oxford Dictionary. I'm standardizing the spelling and moving the article. Meters (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this was article was recently moved back to "trolleybus" I'll point out that the most recent edition of the Gage Canadian Dictionary, the 2013 Nelson Gage Canadian Paperback Dictionary, also lists only "trolley bus". I've  undone the move. Meters (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian spelling is two words
Talk:Tersk horse

message: I think devoting a Wikipedia page to the Tersk Stud is relevant since it's the birthplace of the Tersky breed of horse. I'd be interested in getting it started but I don't know how. Kberkery (talk) 04:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I'm looking at the Wikipedia help pages to find out how to start a new topic. Kberkery (talk) 05:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll make it easy:  Clink on this red link, read directions, and start writing!  Tersk stud.  I'd be glad to help out.  I'll also move a conversation from my talk page over here to help.  By the way, for an example to give you ideas, try Marbach stud.  Oh, and don't forget, Tersk bred other breeds of horses, they have a significant Arabian horse program, for one!  Montanabw(talk) 06:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section for Tersk Stud?
Talk:Maine Department of Corrections

message: As all the other states have a similar page, and it makes it easier to find an article - or see one that needs to be created - please do not delete this article. SGT141 (talk) 03:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Mountain View Correctional Facility and Charleston Correctional Facility have merged into one with a total of 375 inmates (210 CCF + 165 MV)198.182.163.118 (talk) 02:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mountain View Correctional (Addition)
Talk:Vlaamperd

message: Am off to try and fix this article, if what's in there works, please restore the article, thanks.  Montanabw(talk) 05:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Follow up Fixed.  Did a rewrite, found multiple sources, I don't think it's a copyvio any more, but if issues, let me know.  Montanabw(talk) 06:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for stepping in and taking on the rewrite of this article. The issues appear to be addressed. I've replaced the original copyvio page with your version.  — CactusWriter | needles 08:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio problem