Talk:Ruby Tuesday (restaurant)

message: The information contained in the Controversy section isn't really relevant. This seems like a one time deal that doesn't really affect the company at all. I propose that it be deleted. 207.203.147.20 18:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This came up in edit summaries a while back... I agree. Done. /Blaxthos 01:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: is the picture in the Re-branding section needed? Breawycker (talk) 13:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what "needed" is intended to mean in that context, nor am I exactly sure to which picture you're referring. I don't see any problems with any of the pictures in the article... is there a specific concern you have with the picture (or its location in the article)? //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 21:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: It may be interesting to mention the exit from the state of California (except for one location remaining at the San Jose Airport); I believe that there were many in the state at one point. Jim (talk) 22:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size and expanse of chain 

message: I am looking to have this article assessed and upgraded to B-Class quality. Any comments, ideas, and suggestions on what to improve would be appreciated. Chilled616 (talk) 07:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, that it is B-Class. To improve the article, try to provide a citation for things which are likely to be challenged. I have tagged these within the article with . If you were looking to try and make the article a GA standard, I would be happy to help and provide more detailed suggestions for improvement for that criteria.Puffin Let's talk! 08:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

text: The low importance rating is appropriate as it is not a major player in the American Pub style restaurant business. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 03:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class Assessment

message: I would like to add pictures to the article that are not of the front of the buildings. Interior pictures, a picture of one of their race cars, or any other relevant picture that is free and not copyrighted would be appreciated. With the addition, I would like to get rid of at least one of the many redundant building pictures in the article. Any thoughts? Chilled616 (talk) 23:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures Requested

message: At the end of the article, it says that all of the employees of the 95 stores were laid off.  I work at RT and that's not true - if there were other stores in the area, employees were allowed to transfer.  Also, nowhere on the MSN article cited does it say they were.  Can we change this?  :)  --97.91.210.39 (talk) 20:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing that sentence. Some of everything (talk) 17:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Restaurant Closings

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ruby Tuesday (restaurant). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010202055200/http://www.rubytuesday.com/ to http://thomson.mobular.net/thomson/7/2539/2973
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010202055200/http://www.rubytuesday.com/ to http://www.rubytuesdaycookbook.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010202055200/http://www.rubytuesday.com/ to http://www.wokhay.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified