lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A Midsummer's Nightmare (LEXX episode)

message: Does this need to be it's own article? Why can't this information be merged into Lexx? What makes this episode more notable than all the others? --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 23:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly diagree with this. I think they all be merged back in to the main Lexx article. Individual Lexx episodes aren't notable enough for their own entries. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 13:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nonviolent Communication

message: First, huge thanks to all who have worked on this article. It's great! I'd like to add a section on nvc in the classroom, dividing into k-12 and college classrooms. I'm thinking it fits best under research since what I have to offer really is a review of the literature on this - but thought I would ask first if folks thought it should go elsewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara.koopman (talk • contribs) 15:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  nvc in the classroom 

message: The introduction clearly presents the method non-neutrally by making remarks like:
The result is interpersonal harmony and learning for future cooperation.
However, due to its far-reaching impact, has many beneficial "side effects" as a spiritual practice, as a set of values, as parenting Best Practices, as a tool for social change, as a mediation tool, as an educational orientation, and as a worldview.
NVC greatest impact has been in personal development, relationships, and social change.
At its heart is a belief all human beings have capacity for compassion and empathy.
I feel like the article does a good job presenting the common criticisms and remarks in "Research" and "Responses", but the introduction seems to have lines with strongly positive opinions instead of facts, while the references used are academic opinions.
I added an Unbalanced tag as of May 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agucova (talk • contribs) 
: I agree. The intro is unclear and falls into WP:ADVOCACY. For example, it never says what NVC is; mostly it just names some hazy benefits. If you'd like to make a WP:BOLD rewrite from scratch, please feel free. See WP:Writing_better_articles#Lead_section for some ideas if you haven't already. —Ben Kovitz (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I  and removed the  tag. If anyone thinks that there are still WP:NPOV issues in the lead, you can revert my edit and discuss here, or edit the lead further to remove any remaining problems. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 17:42, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Violation 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 15:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonviolent Communication →  – Since the title is not referring to a proper name, "communication" should be lowercase, per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization). ~BappleBusiness[talk] 12:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 May 2022
Talk:The Ransom of Red Chief

message: ok, I may not know much, but is philoproginitis (sic) even a word!? Tinlv7 22:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  philoprogenitis!? 

message: Should the list of adaptations be expanded?  The Fantasy Island story "Cornelius and Alfonse" is based on the O. Henry story (Roarke even calls Tattoo "Red Chief" at one point).
Wecotanoxa (talk) 08:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More examples? 

message: why did the boy stay with the men in the cave 2601:2C1:8400:2CC0:6904:A6B:664C:C7B (talk) 00:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  bark 

message: The article should address whether it was legal for the father to refuse to accept the return of the boy without payment.  This might be child abandonment or something. 47.139.40.116 (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stupid legal question
Talk:Valentín Paniagua

message: The real purpose of this talk page is to share and add important information to the article, NOT for political propaganda.--AAAAA 17:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Desktop notes

message: What about creating links to some freeware programs? There's quite a few, such as:
* desktop-post-it-notes.net  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.28.40 (talk) 13:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with the above recommendations.  WP is NOT a directory of links, particularly commercial ones. (Removed links above in comments) Calltech (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

message: Not sure how we decide what to add to this article, but potentially useful for someone: Skwyrul , Skwyrul PRO / SkwyrulPro . -- I am adding this here for discussion per 
WP:SPAM#How_not_to_be_a_spammer, #6. I am not associated with this product in any way whatsoever. -- 201.19.77.39 12:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Skwyrul

message: Are there any alternatives for GNU operating systems?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iiiears (talk • contribs) 09:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See the article.  Guy Harris (talk) 02:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linux, BSD, 

message: Is the ShixxNOTE application necessary to include in this article? It seems like self promotion from Sirola, who apparently developed ShixxNOTE. I understand that third party applications are available, but ShixxNOTE seems like a random example. TheFirstVicar4 (talk) 13:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ShixxNOTE
Talk:Luis Alva Castro

message: The real purpose of this talk page is to share and add important information to the article, NOT for political propaganda.--AAAAA 17:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lourdes Flores

message: The real purpose of this talk page is to share and add important information to the article, NOT for political propaganda.--AAAAA 17:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Spanish Wikipedia has a pretty long article on Flores. We should translate alot of it to add on to this page.--Jersey Devil 00:59, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you translate the Spanish version, please avoid the obvious propaganda that I'm trying to get rid of myself. I just placed a noneutral sign, which was removed within minutes without justification. 128.195.88.18 07:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Krzeszowice

message: Not sure which article was first, but  &  has the same contents as the history chapters. And www.naszlaku.pl does not seem to be GFDL. Copyvio from naszlaku.pl suspected. --JanSlupski 00:35, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrights

message: In wikifying the article, I had difficulty with the first part of this section of the article having to do with the geophysical origins of the springs (and some of the science of the springs). The history part was easy enough (although I did not spend a lot of time cleaning up some of the redundancies), but someone with some knowledge of the science involved could clean up or clarify some of the technical aspects of this section. Fluit 17:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the spa

message: For this locale, at the identical geographic coordinates, he first edition of the gazetteer Where Once We Walked gives a primary spelling of Krzeszowiec. In this Wikipedia and also the Polish Wikipedia that spelling doesn't appear on the :pl:Krzeszowice page, though it's the surname of several notable individuals. How might we verify whether this was a historical spelling or some other explanation, before adding it to the page? -- Deborahjay (talk) 06:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Either an oblique case, or an individual from Kreszowice. Jan1naD (talk • contrib) 08:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krzeszowiec
Talk:Carlos Ferrero

message: The real purpose of this talk page is to share and add important information to the article, NOT for political propaganda.--AAAAA 17:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Susana Higuchi

message: The real purpose of this talk page is to share and add important information to the article, NOT for political propaganda.--AAAAA 17:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since the category of Japanese Peruvian covers both national identities and is a sub category of both Japanese people and Peruvian people, it seems redundant to include all three. I will remove them. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 02:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese and Peruvian people categories 
Talk:Javier Pérez de Cuéllar

message: Does anyone out there have a better picture we can use? The current one is not very flattering. Mark Shaw (talk) 03:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks pretty official, don't know much about it. Should UN official pics be OK?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.185.125.73 (talk) 00:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 
Talk:Phoebus, Virginia

message: Talk page for Phoebus, Virginia
Removed this text "Phoebus is also world-reknown as the hometown of the Kiessling brothers."
I cannot find sources for this insertion from an anonymous contributor. Please cite your sources. Vaoverland 00:49, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

message: This article says "was", implying it does not currently exist. Yet Google Maps says it exists and the Phoebus website indicates it does (but that website seems to be unofficial).
Does Yama's still exist? Apparently not but Michael Yamamoto (Deceased), Hampton, VA Virginia and Tidewater VA Hippie Reunion, list of hippies of 1960s-1970s mention it. Sam Tomato (talk) 07:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it exist? 

message: I changed the article’s “was” to “is” because the town indeed exists and the website mentioned in discussions below is the official website (it is funded and run by a prominent local civic organization since the government was dissolved). 2601:987:300:45E0:8997:B1B3:5E9A:19ED (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes it exists! 

message: My apologies, I forgot to include the official website address. The dot info site is NOT about the town. 2601:987:300:45E0:8997:B1B3:5E9A:19ED (talk) 05:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  PhoebusVa.com
Talk:Baháʼí review

message: Can you provide a source for the "penalty" statement.  Is it different than the penalty for breaking any other Baha'i law or legislation? -- Jeff3000 16:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Penalties

message: Presumably, much of the Wikipedia content on the Baha'i Faith would be expected to be written by its adherents.  Is it common practice for Baha'is to seek clearance for contributions here? —Wookipedian 04:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: no clearance is needed for Wikipedia. -- Jeff3000 07:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? —Wookipedian 02:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Read a little more about how Wikipedia works. There are no rules. Well there are rules, but anybody can edit them. Writing articles involves contributions from hundreds of users, and it is a constantly changing atmosphere. Editing Wikipedia is not considered 'publishing' in the sense that Baha'i review is required for.  Cuñado  - Talk 03:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

text: To me, the subject of the non-application of the policy to Internet content seems sufficiently interesting and relevant here that I think it would be good to put something about it into the main article along with a summary of the reasoning involved.  I'll be happy to do some/most of the work on phrasing that, but the subject is outside of my expertise.  Is it worth trying? —Wookipedian 06:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A section could be added, but I couldn't find the original source for the statement (even though I've known it for a while, and seen the original document), so unless we can find that document, there isn't a very good verifiable source for the statement. -- Jeff3000 13:47, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Does the policy apply to Wikipedia contributions?
Talk:HeadLand

message: Coming here to learn about it, I leave without knowing what the show was about.  Is it a murder mystery?  A character driven soap opera?  A science fiction drama?  Could somebody note what the show is actually about?  74.240.246.250 (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What is it?

message: I noticed that the only star of the show who did not yet have their own Wikipeida entry was the show's most known star Libby Tanner, so I created one. - Matthew238 01:00, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Many guides refer to the show using the spelling Headland, however the titles give the headLand spelling, and, working of what the soap opera WikiProject proposes (which may not apply to this)—or at least what I can gather from it—this spelling is possibly the best one. I'll do the shift now. --JB Adder | Talk 08:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I don't know that it has. I have heard there has been no decision made, and whoever added that comment did not add a source. On that basis I am going to remove it. DynaBlast 23:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is what was removed - As of 28th Decemeber 2005 headLand has been officially axed from its Monday-Thursday 7.00pm slot and all remaining episodes will be aired at Monday and Thursday at 9.00pm as of January 16th. No further seasons will be produced. - It would be good to know where this info came from. - Matthew238 07:33, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-added a bit about the shows cancellation, as a look at TV Week confirms that headLand is not being shown from the 16th of January. - Matthew238 07:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I'm going to edit that a bit. Seven have not made a decision on Headland yet, and it was known months ago that Headland would go off during the Australian Open. DynaBlast 08:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The site http://www.screenhub.com.au have announced via email newflash today that the series has been cancelled. Nothing on the actual site yet (which is a subscription site.) Asa01 07:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fragaria × Comarum hybrids

message: Dr. U (and anyone else) - Do you have a reference for the fact these are decaploid? I don't doubt it...actually I'd just about concluded that 'Lipstick' was before I read this page, but the patent for 'Pink Panda' calls it a "chromosome subsitution" line, which is 98% Fragaria in its genomic composition. I find this a little hard to believe, and patents are notoriously bad sources for science info, but I'm just curious where this info came from.
Also, does anyone know about the ornamental strawberry 'Wildfire'? I've seen occasional references to it alongside 'Lipstick' and 'Pink Panda', but I've never been able to find out more than that it has red/pink flowers, but no idea whether this is also a hybrid with Potentilla 
Elakazal 01:20, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about 'Wildfire', but the chromosome number information is in the Mabberley reference (not decaploid but heptaploid!), with more information than quoted on this page. It is not inconsistent with these being chromosome substitution lines, or chromosome addition or subtraction lines, since they are derived from backcrosses with Fragaria. The code of nomenclature takes a convenient approach and considers them all to be hybrids, even after many generations of backcrossing. Nadiatalent (talk) 15:04, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

message: The new genus, Comarum, is closer to Fragaria than to Potentilla sensu stricto. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Comarum is a very old genus, restored to currency. Nadiatalent (talk) 15:04, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Marsh Cinquefoil is not in ''Potentilla'' anymore

message: Moved the page and moved this talk page. Nadiatalent (talk) 20:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for updating the page, Nadia. Just be sure to move pages in the future with the move tab at the top of the page instead of copying and pasting. Wikipedia publishes contributions under the Creative Commons licenses, which require a full history of contributions to the collective work. A copy and paste move separates earlier contributions from the page at its current location, so I had to complete a page history merge. If you're ever unable to move a page for reasons of multiple edits at the target page, you can request the move at WP:RM or feel free to ask me on my talk page if its an uncontroversial move. Great work you've been doing here. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 15:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, especially for the licensing explanation which explains the existence of such complexity. I'll keep trying to learn to get page moves to work for me. Nadiatalent (talk) 17:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page moved

message: The tone tag for this page indicates that suggestions about how to improve this article can be found on the talk page. Does anyone have any suggestions of that nature? Nadiatalent (talk) 15:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Inappropriate tone" tag
Talk:Rusty Collins

message: The article has a sentence that is ungrammatical, but I don't know enough about the subject to fix it. It says Rusty and Skids were separated from the New Mutants for a time when Mystique's Freedom Force attacked them Liberty Island. Is that attacked them on  Liberty Island, attacked them from  Liberty Island, or some other adverb? Andrew.langmead 19:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Privy Counsellors (1820–1837)

message: Um, isn't a member of the Privy Council a Privy Councillor, not a "counsellor" (which is somebody who gives you hopefully-meaningful personal advice, rather than a member of a council)Skookum1 01:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Counsellors"?
Talk:Wisconsin Highway 100

message: Aside from the fact that both highways encircle metropolitan areas, MN-100 and WI-100 share nothing.  they are 2 seperate highways over 200 miles apart.
:Obviously, the two have nothing in common. (And it'd be nice if you signed your comments with four tildes.) --jwhouk 11:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with MN-100??
Talk:Center of Polish Sculpture

message: The following is an extract from a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Polish Wikipedians' notice board#Centre of Polish Sculpture regarding the naming of this article: 
: The translation on the official website is correct, regardless of whether the centre contains sculpure from other parts of the world. In Centrum Rzeźby Polskiej the 'Polskiej' pertains to the 'Rzezba', meaning Polish sculpture, making it the Centre of Polish Sculpture. To say 'Polish Sculputre Centre' turns the meaning around - in other words 'Polish Centre of Sculpture' (which would be Polski Centrum Rzezby). This is different to a Centre of Polish Sculpture. It may be that the centre contains art that was created elsewhere, but if the centre has an official name then it should be translated correctly - which the official site has done. The page shouldn't have been moved. All the wikilinks from other sites still point to the old site so perhaps it should be moved back. -- Adz 01:44, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are "sculpture garden," "Open-Air Sculpture Gallery" and "5,200 m2 sculpture garden" synonyms?  If not, how do they relate to each other?  logologist 02:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Sculpture garden' and 'Open-Air Sculpture Gallery' are synonyms. In this case it's a park in English style surrounding the manor. The only difference may be that since those are mostly modern objects, some of them were designed esp. for the park and are its integral part now. But I don't think it makes any difference in the naming of the place. The 5,200 m2 area is another thing, and I used 'square' in the article. Here's from the official page: "5,200m2 open-air square with sculpting stands equipped with electric and water installations". In fact it's a yard hidden behind some farm buildings which are adapted for a hotel now. It's a working area, clearly separated from the park. --SylwiaS 03:54, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Near Radom--SylwiaS 03:54, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology

message: In sentence 2, what does "objects" refer to?  (The term is repeated farther down.)  "Sculptures" and "installations" are "objects" too.  logologist 05:31, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's all problem with the slang of Polish artists. 'Objects' (pl: Obiekty) usually refer to things which are not sculptures and not complex installations. There are e.g. 'obiekty trwałe' and 'obiekty nietrwałe' like stones and video projections etc. I don't know if it makes any sense in English. Esp. that the English word 'object' is probably even wider than the Polish one, so it may sound strange. On the other hand Polish artists and art critiques usually take the terms from philosophy (see: Object (philosophy)) but, well, they tend to simplify things, so it sounds sometimes quite funny. Anyhow, I am positive that the word 'object' in Polish is used separately from 'sculptures' and 'installations', but if it doesn't make any sense in English, we can skip it.--SylwiaS 09:48, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Objects."
Talk:Vitis cinerea

message: Am I crazy or is the Mustang Grape supposed to be V. mustangensis? I've never heard that name applied to cinerea.Elakazal 01:53, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Bill Bland

message: The original version said Bland was a dentist. From all the evidence on the net, he was an optician.
I added some external links.
Camillus McElhinney 01:54, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lord George Murray

message: No longer a redirect but didn't remove RFD tag because I don't know the protocolSkookum1 02:00, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Also, I've gone through and disambiguated the following pages which formerly redirected here:
* Jacobitism
* Battle of Culloden
* Jacobite Rising
* Bishop of Saint David's
* John Murray, 3rd Duke of Atholl
Also, based on the last-named, I've discovered that the general was grandfather to the bishop. Doops |  talk 04:38, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

text: And I suspect that the Sir George Murray who was Lieutenant-Governor of Upper Canada/General/Master of the Ordinance et al was a relation of the Bishop's and the father or grandfather or uncle of George Matheson Murray, who I know was of Canadian Establishment stock but I don't know the details.  His daughter's bio speaks of the family as old-guard Protestants with old-Canada connections; sounds like the L-G of U.C. to me but I can't be sure at this point; could very well be that they were all each other's namesake, with the name reappearing in successive generations of Murrays.Skookum1 05:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)