Template talk:History of architecture

message: Maybe Sumerian architecture should go? I don't know how much they influenced their successors. Burschik 14:14, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Exclude Sumerian?

message: As the history of western architecture is a very long series, should we divide this template to form maybe another? Anyone want to help with another template, to list 20th century movements in architecture? Some title proposals are 20th century architecture, modern architecture, and contemporary architecture. It would list, modern architecture, postmodern architecture, deconstructivist architecture, critical regionalism, sustainable architecture, futurist architecture, and others.   DVD+ R/W 19:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Modernism or contemporary series

message: Why was Critical Regionalism cathegorised under modern series while post-modernism is still listed under historical series.  Critical regionalism is an extension of Post-modernism.  Infact twice removed from Modernism. --Dado 19:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Regionalism or critical regionalism now has its own template, .  DVD+ R/W 20:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I'd contend that critical regionalism does belong in the modern architecture template. It's not a modernism template but is really "a contemporary architecture of the 20-21st century template", critical regionalism, as a modern school of thought belongs there. --Mcginnly | Natter 14:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh my god!! You deleted Critical Regionalism!! You ... :) 

message: The vertically aligned navigation box has some drawbacks - it can play havoc with page layouts - the more links that are added to it the more unwieldy it becomes. Typical solutions are to introduce horizontal navigation boxes that span the page horizontally - these can then be fairly descretely added to the bottom of article pages in the See also sections. I propose such a change to this template. Secondly, I propose that the scope of the template is broadened to Architectural history - rather than just western arch history - there's quite a lot of articles now such as Mesoamerican architecture, Incan architecture or Newari architecture that warrant inclusion. We should maintain the list in the chronological order it is in now. --Mcginnly | Natter 15:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest it's format looks something like this:- --Mcginnly | Natter 15:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reform proposals

message: The old template:-
left|50px This article is part of the History of westernarchitecture series
Neolithic architecture
Ancient Egyptian architecture
Sumerian architecture
Classical architecture
Ancient Greek architecture
Ancient Roman architecture
Byzantine architecture
Medieval architecture
Romanesque architecture
Gothic architecture
Renaissance architecture
Baroque architecture
Neoclassical architecture
Neo-Renaissance architecture
Gothic Revival architecture
Modern architecture
Postmodern architecture
Related articles
Edit this box
ro:Format:Istoria_arhitecturii
 --Mcginnly | Natter 10:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from main page

message: Should Harappan Architecture go on the template? --θnce θn this island Speak! 23:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harappan? 

message: I think I'm not the only one to find this navbox a little hard to navigate. As a list it's technically not that bad, and the attempted chronological order isn't perfect but it's somewhat intuitive; but displayed as a box it's hard to find what you're looking for and some of the links have the same names but lead to different articles (e.g. for the Revival styles vs the original styles). 
Could we maybe introduce some splits or subsections within the navbox? Even just something like pre-modern vs modern architectural styles (not necessarily in those terms) would already help, or something else simple and sufficiently universal. R Prazeres (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions to organize the template?