lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cabanossi

message: So does one usually eat it raw or cooked? David 26 March 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.241.136.158 (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Don't know about southern hemisphere, but isn't it the same as kabanosy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.182.198 (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabanossi or Kabanosy? 

message: Based on the package sitting in front of me, in Australia I know it as Kabana. This may be specific to this producer (Don).
It is usually eaten raw. I pronounce it as Ka Ba Na.
Wizarth (talk) 04:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kabana

message: where did the stuff originate?
is it related to kabanos?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.241.9 (talk) 12:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that nobody really know. In all the countries of old Austria-Hungary-Empire, it is believed, that kabanos (Pl.: kabanosy or kabanosi) was invented by the Italians. But the Italians do not know any Kabanos and when, they believe, that the sausage comes from the eastern Europe - Balkan and Turkey, Ukraine or Poland, from far, far away! Probably they are all right and also probably: a mistake all the same! Who knows? 87.245.91.33 (talk) 10:17, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country of Origin and relation to Kabanos? 

message: please andycjp (talk) 06:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabanos
This article is a ripoff that provides false information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.254.188.79 (talk) 22:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the article doesn't indicate any difference between kabanos and cabanossi. As it is, they should be merged, although there is very little to take from here - perhaps a note that some manufacturers (which ones?) also use this name variation. --85.253.66.252 (talk) 06:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is an incorrect double-post of kabanosy
Talk:Peripatus

message: The article talks about "etymologists".  These are people who study the meaning of words.  Surely the article means to refer to "entomologists" - people who study insects?
Also, I believe Peripatus is resticted in its location to tropical rainforests, esp. north Australia.  I will check and return to edit.
PatrickHadfield 16:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The "etymologist" sentence had bigger problems: talking about a relationship between arthropods and worms makes little sense, as "worm" is a very general term.  Maybe they meant a relationship between the arthropods and onychophora?  Who knows.  The text was vague enough that it is better to just remove it than to try to guess what was meant. Kingdon (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymologists?

message: This article was a mess, confusingly switching between the genus Peripatus and the name peripatus, which is applied to the Onychophora as a whole. The article for Onychophora is great, very comprehensive, so sending people there if at all possible would be an improvement. I've tried to clarify the difference throughout. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 09:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing the confusion
Talk:Wedge-capped capuchin

message: Following up on the work last year, students from Washington University in St. Louis have been editing this page in the past week to attempt to bring the page to "Good Article" status.  We have been trying to go off the GA review comments, and have expanded the intro, written a section on phylogeny, added a photo, and written a bit about the animals' ecology (outside of behavior) and conservation.  See the banner at the top for information pertaining to last year's course, as well as this year's course.  Gharris7 (talk) 22:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits, September 2013

message: I have read over the entire wiki entry and attempted to make a succinct summary of the main points of the article to function as a lead section. Srowitz  —Preceding undated comment added 02:15, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: In an effort to bring this page to the "Good Article" status, I added a section on "Infanticide." Not only is this topic interesting, but I also hoped that it would help flesh-out the "Behavior" heading. This update was done as an assignment (see above), and any input that you may have for my update, as well as future updates to this page, is greatly appreciated. Thanks! Jdhale (talk) 01:37, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Infanticide

message: In order to improve the quality of this article, I added a section on food washing in wedge capped capuchins and a section on its conservation status. This was done as an assignment for behavioral ecology at wustl. kaijones5245 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Food Washing and Conservation Status

message: ===Peer Review===
I looked over the Social Interaction section. This article is well-written. I made few to no grammatical corrections. I did add quite a few links. The topics are interesting and your additions are informative and understandable. Great job! WhitleyTucker (talk) 09:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I looked over the Social Interaction section. This article is well-written. I made few to no grammatical corrections. I did add quite a few links. The topics are interesting and your additions are informative and understandable. Great job! WhitleyTucker (talk) 09:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review

message: The social interaction and the group demographics sections are really strong in this article. I made a few minor grammatical edits and added in a few links, but overall it was very clear and thorough. This article would benefit from an additional behavior section about the weeper capuchin's breeding. Additionally, a more general description of the weeper capuchins is needed. Great contributions! Samara levine (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review
Talk:List of islands in the Mediterranean

message: The following comment was posted at meta:Wikimedia site feedback/main#List of Islands in the Mediterranean:
:You correctly list "Euboea" as the the 6th largest Island.
:BUT ON THE SATALITE MAP YOU SHOW 1/2 OF THE ISLAND AND ALMOST ALL OF ATTICA. You're :editors can do better.
:Also; though I assume historicaly correct - in English it might be better to refer to the :islad as Evia - that is how its pronounced.
:AA Ravenas Halkis - Evia
(copied here by Thryduulf 19:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment from Meta 

message: I attempted to remove a duplicate entry for Zannone, but the template editing has terrorized me. 151.29.55.235 (talk) 20:35, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplicated name 

message: I suggest moving the pictures out of the table off to the side.
I also suggest removing the "Capital" column for lack of relevance. A better column would be population density and/or island group. Wizmut (talk) 15:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columns
Talk:Black capuchin

message: On 5 November 2008, Dysmorodrepanis added a hidden note to the References section: "Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23 (3): 888–890".  While this may be a useful citation, it does not provide author and title of the cited work (nor the year), just the journal, volume, number and pages.  Also, since it was hidden, it was not of much use there.  I have moved it here so that it can be fleshed out by someone who has access to that journal.--Bejnar (talk) 08:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The full citation is: Ludwig, G.; L.M. Aguiar & V.L. Rocha (2006) "Comportamento de obtenção de Manihot esculenta Crantz (Euphorbiaceae), mandioca, por Cebus nigritus (Goldfuss) (Primates, Cebidae) como uma adaptação alimentar em períodos de escassez" Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23(3): 888-890.  However, the article, in Portuguese, does not seem particularly relevant as it is about behavioral changes in Cebus nigritus, namely their eating habits, during periods of scarcity, namely starting to eat manioc (cassava). --Bejnar (talk) 08:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you haven't already, I would suggest you take this up with Dysmorodrepanis. • Rabo³ • 16:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:Central American squirrel monkey

message: One form of altruism that this article mentions briefly is the use of alarm calls in squirrel monkey. It would be interesting to see whether the monkey did this for all his troopmates, or only for certain kinds of members like mature females or for the young. Being a rather noisy brood of monkeys, it would be interesting to see whether the squirrel monkeys used their voices for any other cooperative activity. Perhaps squirrel monkeys are not very cooperative, but since their social structure is marked by no coalitions or sex-based dominance it does appear to be more individualistic than other primate species. Sadly, I still think this article could have been improved by specifically stating the failure of squirrel monkeys to cooperate beyond alarm calls. Marklxb (talk) 20:03, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary on Cooperation 

message: I lived in rural Panama for a number of years a few years back and this species is still very prevalent on the north shore of lake gatun.  They frequently came up to my doorstep and I definately positively identified them.  This is in contrast to this wikipedia article which places them exclusively on the border with Costa Rica.  I have many contacts in that area that can conccur.
Adam
vivatuanis@yahoo.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.72.75.48 (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central American Squirrel Monkey Distribution in Panama
Talk:Tax protester/Archive 1

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Tax protester. The final result was Keep. --Deathphoenix 03:48, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD results

message: ===Relevant tax cases:===
Congress has taxed INCOME, not compensation." - [Conner v. U.S., 303 F Supp. 1187 (1969)]
"Income within the meaning of the 16th Amendment and the Revenue Act means, gain ... and, in such connection, gain means profit... proceeding from property severed from capital, however invested or employed and coming in, received or drawn by the taxpayer for his separate use, benefit and disposal." - [Staples v. U.S., 21 F Supp 737 U.S. Dist. Ct. ED PA, 1937] -
*Over-ruled by Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. 348 U.S. 426 (1955): "Congress applied no limitations as to the source of taxable receipts, nor restrictive labels as to their nature. And the Court has given a liberal construction to this broad phraseology in recognition of the intention of Congress to tax all gains except those specifically exempted." "except those specifically exempted"
**Yes, except those specifically exempted by Congress in the tax code - e.g., gifts, scholarships, a few others. Wages, money found on the street, gains from barter transactions, qui tam bounties, exemplary damages, points for airline miles, and dinners at board meetings are all among the many things which federal courts have specifically found not to have been "specifically exempted", and which therefore require taxes to be paid on them. BD2412 T 03:13, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court cases to support Sixteenth Amendment intent

message: Congress has taxed INCOME, not compensation." - [Conner v. U.S., 303 F Supp. 1187 (1969)]
"Income within the meaning of the 16th Amendment and the Revenue Act means, gain ... and, in such connection, gain means profit... proceeding from property severed from capital, however invested or employed and coming in, received or drawn by the taxpayer for his separate use, benefit and disposal." - [Staples v. U.S., 21 F Supp 737 U.S. Dist. Ct. ED PA, 1937] -
*Over-ruled by Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. 348 U.S. 426 (1955): "Congress applied no limitations as to the source of taxable receipts, nor restrictive labels as to their nature. And the Court has given a liberal construction to this broad phraseology in recognition of the intention of Congress to tax all gains except those specifically exempted." "except those specifically exempted"
**Yes, except those specifically exempted by Congress in the tax code - e.g., gifts, scholarships, a few others. Wages, money found on the street, gains from barter transactions, qui tam bounties, exemplary damages, points for airline miles, and dinners at board meetings are all among the many things which federal courts have specifically found not to have been "specifically exempted", and which therefore require taxes to be paid on them. BD2412 T 03:13, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevant tax cases:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Church of reality

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  
The result of the debate was Speedy delete as G4 (Recreation of deleted material)  --RoySmith 01:29, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I am the founder of the Church of Reality.
I am fighting censorship on Wikipedia to keep them from deleting the Church of Reality entry. Here's some of the history of the discussion.
----
* 
* 
Overturn and Undelete I would like the Church of Reality undeleted. It was originally deleted because it wasn't notable because it had only 3000 Google hits and it wasn't a 501(C)3 non profit. It now has 24,900 Google hits and is now an [http:// _tax_exempt_status/ IRS blessed 501(C)3 church]. So the reason it was deleted is no longer valid.--Marcperkel 02:12, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *On the other hand, I would dismiss Mar10029 as being a sockpuppet who has only ever made three edits, all to this discussion . --RoySmith 15:26, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What's hard to swallow is so many new users suddenly arriving at DRV—a page whose existence I didn't discover for months after I joined Wikipedia—and posting expressions of support using such similar styles of phrasing, spacing, and punctuation. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:33, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

text: And that ALL of them somehow managed to hijack MarcPerkel's account. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:35, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's because I sent a link to this page out to all my non-existent members to ask them to vote to undelete. I pointed hundreds of people at this page. I'm hoping that I have at least convinced everyone that the Church of Reality has more than one member. --Marcperkel 17:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church of Reality censorship
Talk:Chriss angel

message: There is an illusionist by the name of chriss angel, I am unsure of the exact spelling at this time as I have seen it numerous ways.  He was featued on the TV show "Vegas" a few weeks ago as a special guest star, on US NBC networks.  There have been other specials of his shows recently. So the article just needs major work IMO. Das Nerd 18:00, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Eddie Shack

message: The hockey career is likely easily referenced but some of the non-hockey material might need some more work.
Here is a Pop Shoppe reference - http://www.sodaspectrum.com/shoppe.htm
There isn't anything that quickly pops out in a search to verify the Schick razor endorsement. -- Whpq (talk) 17:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: In at least one place, given Shack's reputation as a fighter, people carried signs saying "Sack Shack", "Rack Shack", and "Shatter Shack".  I also remember a comment (words might not be exact, because this is from memory): "There has been some bad blood between Eddie Shack and [Phila. Flyers'] Larry Zeidel, and on ___ some of it spilled."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 15:38, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  People would carry signs
Talk:Myobatrachinae

message: This article contains genuses which - following the ITIS taxonomy - belong to three different families: Myobatrachidae, Limnodynastidae and Rheobatrachidae! The picture is also concerned (species belongs to Limnodynastidae). Please compare with the german and the french article! -- Fice, Nov. 28, 2005.
:I know this was said ages ago, but I have only just come across it, so I will respond now. I have recently created the Limnodynastidae article, and added the genera according to the American Museum of Natural History. My Australian frog books are old (meaning to update) and all of them do not recognise Limnodynastidae as a family of its own. Also, many well known Australian frog websites do not recognise it. I am more comfortable using proper taxonomic resources however, and if they say that it exists as a family, then so be it. I will change this article to only include Myobatrachidae genera, and will add a note to readers to look for the other genera in the Limnodynastidae article. I will also change the image to the Common Eastern Froglet, as that is the only image of a Myobatrachid frog I am aware of. --liquidGhoul 12:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Annals of Improbable Research

message: The website now doesn't look at all like the archived 2009 site; it's full of what look like sponsored product advertorial. MrDemeanour (talk) 15:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean improbable.com? It's not advertorial; it's full of articles from the magazine and a few relates things like Marc's co-authored book on Bark Beetles. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry - I see you were looking at "improb.com". That's not the website linked in the article. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Under References, reference #3 links to improb.com, with the link-title "Improbable Research". MrDemeanour (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It links to an archived page back when improb.com was still good; it doesn't link to the website itself. I have updated the website in the infobox- DavidWBrooks (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  improb.com
Talk:Yokosuka E14Y1

message: This is an interesting article, but it is only very peripherally about the Yokosuka E14Y1. Perhaps it should be renamed Japanese naval attacks on the Pacific North-West or something similar. -- chris_j_wood 18:26, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact it is repeating material to be found in various other articles (Yokosuka E14Y, Nobuo Fujita, Attacks on United States territory in North America during World War II) hence my converting it to a redirection page. David Kernow 21:36, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading title
Talk:Pierre Cauchon

message: Revised two line stub with translation from the French Wikipedia. Durova 18:27, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone changed the wording on this technical point.  According to this court's narrow interpretation of Deuteronomy 22:5, Joan of Arc's assumption of male clothing was heresy.  A second trial concluded that their analysis was flawed, but that is a separate matter from the point raised here.  The final twelve articles of accusation accuse her of consorting with devils, which constitutes sorcery rather than heresy.  Now here's where things get sticky: they couldn't make that an actual charge.  The wife of the regent of England had declared that Joan was a virgin, which precluded the court from charging her with witchcraft (all very strange to modern ears, but this was the way their legal system worked).  
So to cut to the chase, the court wanted to work sorcery into the proceeding. Durova 06:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorcery vs. heresy 

message: It is claimed that he was "well paid for his efforts" to "gain Joan of Arc from the Burgundians for the English". Is there any evidence in support of this defamatory allegation? The conventional wisdom is that the trial was fair in his eyes, and that as it was his diocese he had every right to try heresy charges.Royalcourtier (talk) 09:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Payment 

message: The statement on the excommunication uses a quote from The Tablet below
"Reviews: Le Martyre de Jeanne d'Arc The Tablet, Volume 75 (June 28, 1890) p. 1010 via Google Books retrieved December 30, 2016.
Another "reliable" English-language source for this claim seems to be the [ Cauchon article in the 1910 Encyclopaedia Britannica], which relies on an French-language article in:
: [ p. 15]. 
The Brittanica article appears to be a misreading of an isolated sentence. (It also claims it was done by a Callixtus IV, Callixtus III was the last). Cerf's page linked above, if read in full, Cerf makes the argument that if Cauchon had been excommunicated by Callixtus III and his body thrown in a ditch, the Chapter at Reims would not have continued to celebrate a mass for his repose every December,  and his remains would not continue to lie Liseaux as attested as late as 1620.  Also see Olivier Bouzy's note in Fresh Verdicts on Joan of Arc that Cauchon's body remains in Liseaux. If a more reliable source than these two can be found that Cauchon was posthumously excommunicated that would be great. Wtfiv (talk) 02:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Excommunication of Cauchon?

message: I recently edited material added from many years back that may be associated with long-term sock puppet issues that could have a direct impact on the integrity of this article. see User:Durova/Complex vandalism at Joan of Arc Wtfiv (talk) 03:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Material related to sock puppet issues
Talk:List of Jewish American historians

message: S/be List of Jewish American historians. 24.17.48.241 18:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have sourced the list in accordance with Wikipedia's No Original Research and Verifiability policies. Basically, anyone described by a reliable source as "Jewish" or "Jewish-American" (i.e. as opposed to "of Jewish descent", "Jewish mother", etc.) is on the list. Here are the people I couldn't find anything for. If you have a reliable source that fits that please restore the names:
*Alan Brinkley
*Eric Foner
Mad Jack O'Lantern 18:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: As there is a List of Jewish historians, and this list is quite short, do we need it?20.138.246.89 10:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Jewish historians? 

message: What is the point of this article? There is no List of Italian American historians or List of Muslim American historians.  75.2.209.226 (talk) 21:28, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 
Talk:List of Jewish American economists

message: Should be List of Jewish American economists. 24.17.48.241 18:32, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ponsonby Britt

message: It has been suggested that this be merges with The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show.  The reason I crated this entry is because List of hoaxes has a list of fictional people, and I added Ponsonby Britt to the list.
I did mention Ponsonby Britt on the Bullwinkle page, but I thought it would be better for the list of fictional people to link here.  That's my reasoning, but I won't object to someone changing it, if they think it would be better.  Bubba73 (talk), 18:34, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would choose Jay Ward as the target of the merge and redirect, myself, since Britt got the credit in multiple Ward productions. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Jewish American poets

message: S/be List of Jewish American poets. 24.17.48.241 18:35, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Jewish American authors

message: S/be List of Jewish American authors. 24.17.48.241 18:35, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title?

message: List needs to be sourced and references (see List of Jewish American journalists for an example).  Tagging until this is done.--Isotope23 12:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagging