lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Bridges of Metro Vancouver

message: I added some bridges and tunnels to this list. Most are over the Coquitlam river, but I included two skytrain tunnels too. The Skeena tunnel is on Skeena avenue in vancouver. This north end of the avenue passes under a tunnel below the freeway to connect to Bridgeway on the other side. Not many people know about this tunnel or use it.209.121.155.196 (talk) 03:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Items
File talk:NYC Top of the Rock Pano.jpg

message: -----
This is not one of the finest pictures on Wikipedia, this is the finest picture on Wikipedia.
-CompuRuss
I hate New York, but man, this picture alone is enough to change that.  truly terrific.  Taco325i 00:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fantastic picture, just wanted to compliment the photographer, absolutely beautiful. - Patman2648 07:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  i can say that this is the best photo i have ever seen. scrolling from left to right in fullscreen and seeing that brilliant bright sky in the centre makes me happy and like a new begining, fresh.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.66.110 (talk) 14:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Scandal Savage

message: come one no image for this article, she is the only member of the secret six thats has not got one.
really now whats wrong with wikipedia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.210.112.176 (talk) 10:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Image
Talk:EISPACK

message: I've removed the cleanup-context tag, because I've added enough context so it has a similar amount of context to LAPACK (IMO).
Keithdunwoody 05:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

message: No. It needs expanding. It was a milestone in NA history just like LAPACK and MINPACKBilllion 18:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: The website below describes a 1971 distribution of the EISPACK collection.  The current article says 1972 is the earliest it would have been available.
https://blogs.mathworks.com/cleve/2018/01/02/eispack-matrix-eigensystem-routines/
Bevo (talk) 03:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1971 distribution of EISPACK
Category talk:Commonwealth Games

message: The commonwealth games are fun and competitive. Over the years it has had different names. They are held in a different place each year.
I have added categories for the missing games, ie 1934, 1938, 1954 & 2010 so there is now categories for "1934 British Empire Games" etc Hugo999 (talk) 01:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Games
Talk:Jouy-le-Moutier

message: The second sentence in the History section reads "Two charters by Charlemagne to the bishop of Paris, Eschenradus gave the chapter of Notre Dame de Paris the possession of the church of Andrésy." Can anyone document the existence and identity of this "Eschenradus"? Apparently the name has been in the article since this edit more than two years ago, but I do not see any "Eschenradus" in the Bishop of Paris Wikipedia list. Furthermore the Jouy-le-Moutier website, which is otherwise copied word-for-word from Wikipedia, omits this name. The Catholic Encyclopedia is nonplussed. A Google search turns up nothing but borrowings from Wikipedia. I am going to delete the name, but obviously it should be restored with a reference, if anyone has one. 24.36.74.15 (talk) 02:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A footnote addressing this has been added to the article by Captain scarlet (Talk). 24.36.74.15 (talk) 23:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eschenradus
Category talk:1970 in Canada

message: Wow... I open up a category "1970 in Canada", immediately see a notice asking to populate it, and then see the following:
* 1970 in Canada
* 1970 Governor General's Awards
* 1970 CFL season
Though I wasn't around then, let's just say 1970 in Canada was just a litttle more eventful than those articles might suggest. --Saforrest 05:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Elizabeth Greenfield

message: What was the basis for changing the estimated date of her birth from 1824 to 1819? Does someone have a citation on this? -- Jmabel | Talk 05:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Quik (boot loader)

message: First off, this isn't an advert -- an ad for a boot loader would be somewhat pointless, and in any case it's a small part of a larger product. Second, I don't know about notability -- there are articles for plenty of other boot loaders. Just my thoughts on the matter. Haikupoet 05:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Musto Skiff

message: What, no mention of gwicke?  :-)  +sj + 05:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Voice of San Diego

message: Adding copyright violation tag per request.  Copyvio removed, reverted by vandal, and removed again:
:Thanks, removed copyvio from history. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 13:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I just removed a segment of this story that suggests that, because the author of the CS Monitor piece started writing for VOSD three months later, that he had a conflict of interest when writing the story for the CSM. Seems pretty shaky to me; I've not heard of anyone accused of retroactive bias for writing about a subject and then later becoming involved with it. Isn't that a bit like Victor Kiam liking Remington Razors so much, he bought the company? (Disclosure: I have known Dotinga since college. I have no affiliation with the CSM or VOSD or any other San Diego media.) Personally, the lengthy CSM quote seems awfully self-serving, too. I'm not sure if it's relevant at all. Jsnell (talk) 23:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the lengthy media quotes as well as the insinuation of a retroactive conspiracy, and moved both the CSM and NYT references to a new media section. Jsnell (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innuendo re: CSM profile
Talk:Mission Bay (San Diego)

message: Removed copyright violation.
Recorded violation here per request
:Removed copyvio from history. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 13:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

message: This article appears to have been originally copied verbatim from the “Mission Bay Park” page at the City of San Diego website. 
I have revised it to improve accuracy, remove any suggestion of plagiarism, and eliminate stuff that does not belong in an encyclopedia. 
MelanieN (talk) 02:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 7-1-09 

message: The only source cited is the organization's own website, and the section links directly to a publication from that organization hosted on a Wordpress site. Plus it makes a big "Science shows" claim without citing a source.
--Gsm54321 (talk) 06:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The entire "ReWild Mission Bay" section is a PR puff piece.
Talk:Value-added network

message: All the links were removed as they were all advertising in their nature. · XP · 16:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to do that again for most of the links in the "see also" section, unless somebody gives me a good reason to. I plan to do that tomorrow. #!/bin/DokReggar -talk 06:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  links removed 

message: I attempted to preserve much of the previous wording into the "technical definition" and put some of its more speculative elements into the "perspectives" outlook. Surely some speculation on my behalf. Attempt to demonstrate VAN not only as a technical but also as a (political) marketing construct. Use of "Marketisation (of telecommunication)" is debatable. Also excuse a bit stifled English! Tilt0815 (talk) 22:16, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite Attempt
Talk:Grand Fenwick

message: I see the resemblance to Liechtenstein, but I'm not sure what the Jacobite succession has to do with Grand Fenwick.  Shouldn't that be in the Liechtenstein page, and on the Jacobite page?  And BTW, there's a Jacobite heir with more legitimacy than the Fuerst von Liechtenstein: a thirty-something Nova Scotian named Charles Stuart.Skookum1 06:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; the parallel is so skimpy as to be invisible. So I took it out. - DavidWBrooks 13:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jacobite/Liechtenstein inclusion

message: There is a stage adaptation of TMTR. I was in a performance of it, it had stage scripts. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 07:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage adaptation of ''Mouse That Roared'' 

message: A proposed deletion tag was placed, with the statement that it failed general notability, but it included no link for discussion/vote. I think the topic is notable enough, since it's the central location of three novels, two of which were filmed, and has been referenced in other cultural tidbits as noted in the article. So I'm removing the tag. If the editor who placed it wishes to do so, please use a tag that has a link to the proposed-for-deletion page. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 23:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 
Talk:Jadi Rana

message: On 9 March 2006 06:18 (UTC) 72.130.110.242 had pasted the entire text from http://tenets.zoroastrianism.com/jadi33.html
Not only is that a copyvio, the source is tainted, nor is there is any evidence to indicate that the Jadi Rana of the Qissa-i Sanjan is the same as the Vijyaditya of history. The sentence "From Vijyaditya it became Jyaditya from that it became Jyadi and got corrupted into Jadi" is purely speculative. -- Fullstop 08:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andrew Daulton Lee

message: In this article "Lee was released on parole in 1998. Caitlyn Mills, an activist who had worked towards earning Lee parole, turned her attention towards the release of Boyce following Lee's freedom and eventually married Christopher Boyce. "
But in the Wikipedia article on Boyce, her name is Kathleen Mills.  Does anyone know which one is correct? Throckmorton Guildersleeve (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  mismatched names 

message: The Wikipedia article about Christopher Boyce says Lee did implicate Chris in Mexico and was arrested 14 days later. This article seems to lack much citation. I don't know which is true. 162.246.114.12 (talk) 06:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki contradiction.
Talk:Baby Burlesks

message: This article was listed as a request, I've tried to write it as best as I can. Additions welcome! Mademoiselle Sabina 06:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've seen so many versions of the "Kid" titles around the web, I'm wondering, which of the following are the actual titles seen on-screen in the films?
* Kiddin' Hollywood, or Kid in Hollywood, or Kid 'n' Hollywood?
* Kid 'in' Africa, or Kid in Africa, or Kid 'n' Africa?
- dcljr (talk) 03:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now seen the films themselves, and struck out the incorrect versions above. They do match the versions given in this article. - dcljr (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles 

message: Tommy Bond is listed under "starring" in the infobox. Is this a mistake? Neither the main text of this article, nor the IMDb lists him as appearing in any of these shorts, but he was in Our Gang. Also, I've redirected to this title any names the IMDb lists as (almost) exclusively related to this series. I've left two names unlinked because articles could be written about them in the future, since they did a lot of other things other than this series. - dcljr (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stars 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 17:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:2001 in video games

message: If there are no objections, I would like to remove duplicate entries on this list: titles listed multiple times due to different regional release dates or ported to different platforms. I'll keep the entry for when the title was first released; if readers would like to see when that title was released for their region, it's just a simple click away to the main game page. Thanks for your help Digiwrld1 (talk) 20:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Streamlining Notable Games List 

message: Ikaruga have to be in the list  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.10.248.83 (talk) 12:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Release missing 
Talk:Memory hierarchy

message: topic in memory hierarchy and details on it.
:I added a sentence and a half in the lead paragraph. The topic, being a general category of memory design, is more abstract than the practical orientation of the article. 
:It fills an important subject. If the article needed much more detail to be encyclopedic, it could be classified as a stub, but it hasn't been. It may not need more details. It may just need study, and while doing so, some careful magnification and tighter linking of the details it has.CpiralCpiral 00:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article purpose

message: There is now a "context" template, a cleanup banner in the lead section:  
The editing comment said it was absurd to have a "main" template under the title of the article.
I agree.  Now, what to do?  How about this replacement of the "main" template:
:This article is about the term "memory hierarchy".
:See Computer data storage for the general context.
What is the place in Wikipedia of this article?  I needed it, and it was here.  Now it needs me. I ask for opinions.CpiralCpiral 21:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section cleanup 

message: Various numbers used in this article could the same parameter prefix (i.e., M, G, T, etc) but having different meanings.  The article has now unambiguous usage of prefixes by using consistent SI prefixes in place of JEDEC Binary prefixes throughout.  The first usage in the Examples section with "Level 0 (L0) Micro operations cache – 6,144 bytes (6 KiB)[8] in size" alerts the reader to the usage of SI Binary prefixes.   The question is should the article remain as is or should ambiguous prefixes be used?  Tom94022 (talk) 21:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The article benefits from use of unambiguous units and unit symbols. It would be inappropriate to replies these with ambiguous ones. Dondervogel 2 (talk) 22:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:COMPUNITS controls here. A local consensus cannot override a site-wide guideline. WT:MOSNUM is the correct venue to discuss this if you wish to override WP:COMPUNITS. —Locke Cole • t • c 22:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of ambiguous prefixes
Talk:Carbaminohemoglobin

message: This article states that veins are blue because CarbaminoHb is blue...However, I have read elsewhere on Wikipedia that veins are blue because of the Rayleigh effect. More research should be conducted to find out the answer to this discrepancy. 
My personal thoughts (though this is frowned upon, hopefully it will guide to the answer) is that since CarbaminoHb only consists of 30% of the CO2 transport (West, J. Respiratory Essentials 7 Ed p 82) and that blood is deep crimson upon external haemorrhaging, that the Rayleigh effect is the correct explanation.
-Garaiavu --137.219.205.69 (talk) 01:09, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue Veins 

message: I have some synthesis and mechanism sections/modifications to move over from sandbox into this article as part of an assignment - in particular Hydrogen Ion and Oxygen-Carbon Dioxide Coupling  and general synthesis of Carbaminohaemoglobin. I couldn't find any images with regards to the Carbaminohaemoglobin molecule. Jhb.mb (talk) 21:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry I

message: Male 2405:204:5600:A38C:0:0:720:10A4 (talk) 06:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology 

message: The initial paragraph states that 23% of CO2 is carried in the blood as CO2Hb.  In the Synthesis paragraph, it is stated that approximately 10% of the CO2 is carried by HB in the form of CO2Hb. As a whole, the Synthesis paragraph is confusing.
 Srtmd3322 (talk) 01:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradicting information  

message: — Assignment last updated by Amayra20 (talk) 22:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry I

message: I assume these percentages refer to normal atmospheric pressure. Do they change at altitude or under hyperbaric conditions? Please ping with reply. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 10:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percentages in lead
Talk:John Hejduk

message: Someone needs to add info with regards to John Hejduk's unique work... the poems, drawings, narratives, 'performances'. The more poetic stuff, it's not all just grids and structures. Maybe an image of his work too?
: Agreed there is alot of room for improvement with this. I'm taking out the sentences that have a random list of projects, some of which appear to be monographs, not bulit structure. Someone could find which are wikilinked and put them into the other section. I replicated the excised text below: 
The built work of Hejduk began to appear in the 1980s (Mask of Medusa, Brazil; Kreuzberg Tower, Berlin; House for Two Brothers, Tegel Harbor - Berlin; Security (Interventions), Berlin; etc...) and continue beyond his death. (Wall House 2, Groningen, NL; and Hejduk Tribute Towers, Galicia Cultural Center - Santiago de Compostela with Peter Eisenman).
Bangabandhu (talk) 19:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A photo of the wall house and his other works is badly needed to improve this article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo needed
Talk:A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.

message: Sorry if some people may consider "Chilling effect" as not NPOV, but I believe it is the correct word. However, the section does warrant citations supporting claims such as "frequently cited". I remember it was a popular issue for debate at the time (2001), and the problem of "illegal hyperlinks" continues to echo in circles of digital law (nearly all cases against BitTorrent trackers with .torrent hyperlinks to copyrighted data hinge on this precedent, rather than the newer argument of intent and inducement of MGM v. Grokster) through to today. User:71.246.25.54 / User:71.246.25.218 9 March 2006 (UTC)
:I don't think that "chilling effect" is particularly NPOV. I think that "Criticism" or "Impact" is a more unbiased header, and I'm planning to fix up this section and include citations and links to the amicus briefs filed on behalf of both sides. Agreatnotion (talk) 19:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Napster Ruling

message: The article somewhat implies that Napster was held liable for contributory infringement only, but both district court and court of appeals decisions hold Napster, Inc. liable for vicarious infringement as well. From the court of appeals decision:
"Our review of the record requires us to accept the district court’s conclusion that plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of the vicarious copyright infringement claim. Napster’s failure to police the system’s “premises,” combined with a showing that Napster financially benefits from the continuing availability of infringing files on its system, leads to the imposition of vicarious liability. "
http://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/web/newopinions.nsf/0/c4f204f69c2538f6882569f100616b06?OpenDocument 201.37.185.130 20:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vicarious Infringement

message: I'm going to be working on this page for an IP Law class at UC Berkeley. I've already applied the COA infobox in place of the table that was there, and will be beefing the page up over the next two weeks. --Agreatnotion (talk) 01:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Class Assignment
Talk:Temple of the Feathered Serpent, Teotihuacan

message: This article needs some serious attention.  It sounds like a tenth grade history paper.  Grade C.
:I have spent some time recently fixing up the article.  It's far from perfect, but at least the basics are down.  Could use some more information on the burials there.  Still, I hope you like it, Madman (talk)
I added a section based on today's news regarding the tunnel find. The early press reports were very brief, but it could be one of the great finds of the decade. It will need further revision and citations once more information become available. dckoerner (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs attention

message: This article should be about 3 times longer. Zezen (talk) 22:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Too short
Template talk:Polish truces and peace treaties

message: The template represents an arbitrary selection of peace treaties favorable to Poland. I don't see what's the point of this template which frivolously duplicates the content of :Category:Polish peace treaties. That's what we have cats for. Besides, the inclusion of this pointless template creates a pro-Polish bias in the articles. If no serious objections are raised within several days, I will post it for deletion. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment.  The list is not arbitrary; it contains all of WP's articles on Polish peace treaties.  If any are missing, please add the links to the template. Appleseed (Talk) 14:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've thought about it some more, and I don't really care if the template goes away. Appleseed (Talk) 20:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anti-Denmark Boycott

message: I don't see why this article should need the attention of an expert, so I removed the tag for now. -- Karl Meier 07:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

message: thousands of middle eastern stores have allowed arla products back in stores. should this be added?
yes! Source it? --Irishpunktom\talk 16:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arla foods back on shelves
Talk:Claudia J. Kennedy

message: *Bio from Women's International Center from which she received an award in 1998.
*Interview through CNN in 2001.
*Bio from the William Morris Agency (PDF) (presumably her agent for booking speeches) Google HTML version of the PDF
These should help us flesh out the article further, and cite what we have there. JesseW, the juggling janitor 20:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Further sources

message: I removed a claim that Kennedy was a likely candidate for Secretary of Defense since she will not be eligible for that post for another 2 years.  The cited article doesn't say anything about her being considered for the Secdef appointment anyway.  I thought about removing the VP claim since its citation is pretty weak (the cited article basically describes the claim as a blogosphere rumor) but will leave that up to others. 67.122.210.149 (talk) 02:39, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: secdef and obama vp speculation
Talk:Shine (Bond album)

message: Why are links on some of the songs and yet there aren't any real articles for the song?X27 (talk) 23:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Is it possible to include the length of the tracks? The track lengths are given for the album “Born” but not for this one.  But the album track listing for Shine is in a chart format; is it possible to add things to it at this point?  If it is and someone knows the length of the songs I know I would like the article a lot more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.246.154.251 (talk) 04:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could Someone add