Talk:Naval Criminal Investigative Service

message: How did they miss Pearl Harbor?63.3.2.129 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:33, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II

message: There really should be substantiated somewhere as quite a bit of his autobiography has been ripped apart as pure nonsense. Batman2005 01:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Outlandish Marcinko Claims

message: Article should mention its personnel count.  Tempshill 03:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size? 

message: I removed this part: "The director cameoed on one episode as a retiring agent." Which director, the one form the agency or the one from the show? Please re-insert and clarify if you know (though you might reconsider if it's the show's), and please add the name.
David Brandt did so in season 3's The Frame Up.
Another real-life director cameoed in Season 5's Identity Crisis  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.183.95 (talk) 21:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which director? 

message: The section regarding controversies surrounding NCIS and the "gay witch hunts" makes a claim regarding the vigilance of the department towards said witch hunts versus their vigilance towards their stated job that is uncited and sounds more pissed-off than intelligently expressed.  I'm not taking any side (for all I know, there could be evidence proving NCIS likes to spend more time rooting out gays), but I think NCIS deserves more level-headed scrutiny than mere hissy fits.  My reaction towards an article should be "Huh, that's interesting, I didn't know that", rather than "Really?  I think I'm gonna check out how true that is."  Sure, it's Wikipedia, but don't say we aren't trying.  Saxprodigy 03:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy and Neutrality 

message: The first paragraph sounds like a marketing or recruitment piece and doesn't actually say what the agency does. I don't know enough about the subject to properly remedy it, but hopefully someone out there does. Cheers JonoP 17:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a paragraph of the article, but what is called a hatnote, a pointer before the article itself to help people make sure they are at the right article. It is already properly formatted. oknazevad (talk) 19:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening 

message: Is there anything else that needs to be added to the article, i was a NCIS Special agent and I have heaps of un-classified photos and information so if anyone wants any photos or info I can get it ! --58.165.60.96 (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anything else that need to be added 

message: The link regarding the NCIS HQ move to Quantico isn't correct. The link is Army CID, NOT NCIS. On NCIS' Official Website, the HQ is still listed as the Washington Navy Yard.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.84.103.191 (talk) 05:08, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that too. They are moving but it is gradual, to be completed 09-2011. This link describes it better. Bthebest (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Headquarters Move

message: I think it is not relevant at all, it only lists the sidearms, they actually have a massive armory at NCIS headquarters, MP5K, CQBR, HK416, 5 round S&W handgun (used by NCIS SA's who have just joined the Service and for undercover operations), M16's, and the standard Marine and/or Navy equipment for agents overseas. Since none of this is deleted why not delete the section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.68.68 (talk) 11:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weapons section - irrelevant  

message: If you check the "Links to related articles", there are 4 templates. The information of United States military law enforcement (last template) is included in the information of Federal law enforcement agencies of the United States (second last template). Thus, I believe the last template isn't needed and that it might be removed. — Nuno Agostinho •  (Say It!)  18:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates redundancy 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:36, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion