Talk:ISketch

message: What's with the asterisk before the 'Gallery' link?  Should the link be on a seperate bullet because it isn't really a community per se. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cre8tor (talk • contribs) 13:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yo Cre.  You are correct, sir.  Fixed.--Father Goose 17:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery link? 

message: By definition, a stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text which is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information. Does this article meet this classification?
Netscope 18:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub article? 

message: Hey there.  I did a bunch of work on this article, so I just wanted to briefly summarize what I did and what changes are still needed (and which I don't have time or expertise to do right now):
* Reduced the lead to a couple of sentences describing the site and briefly summarizing its history and implementation.
* Moved details about how to play the game into a new Gameplay section.
* Condensed details about community moderation to a simplified Moderation section.
* Removed the extensive list of languages, rooms and variants - WP is not an instruction manual or an indiscriminate collection of information.
* Removed the "Issues" section - one issue ("Server is full") was not really a technical problem, and is a fact of life for most any online game.  The other (cheating/"griefing") has been neatly rolled up into Moderation.
* Removed first-party references, as they were both unnecessary and were harming the article's integrity.  While the information in the article that was referenced is true, WP relies on secondary and tertiary reliable sources for verifiability.
* Changed the  template to  - we now have only one citation (the Alexa rank, which I'm sure is out of date now).
* Removed the forum-style sections from this Talk page - they are years out of date and are not relevant to improving the article.
We still need the following:
* Development notes as cited from reliable third-party sources.
* Reception information, again cited from reliable sources.
* Proper citations for existing content.
* A scrub through content that is likely to change with time, such as the Alexa rank.
Anyone willing to take that on?  Thanks. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 20:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article maintenance September 2014 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on ISketch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090324223328/http://isketcher.no.sapo.pt/ to http://isketcher.no.sapo.pt/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928143557/http://www.isketchforum.net/gallery/browseimages.php?do=popimages&orderby=views to http://www.isketchforum.net/gallery/browseimages.php?do=popimages&orderby=views
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Article cites no notable sources, and I can't find any new sources. There was a previous debate in 2006 (see here, but all of those sources cited as reasons to keep the article don't seem to exist any more. --HotSection (talk) 17:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for deletion 

message: Check this: https://skribbl.io/ DonRolfo (talk) 15:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clone?