lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of stations in London fare zone 1/Archive 1

message: Is it correct to call it a London Underground Zone? The zones are also used for the DLR, they used to be used on the buses, they apply in some ways to the overground trains and the trams too (particularly in the sense of travelcards). Alexd 15:13, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick glance at the TfL website doesn't offer a formal term - "zone" always seems to be used without a need for qualification. Obviously we have to  qualify it. Any suggestions better than the current? TfL zone 1? LT zone 1? Pcb21| Pete 15:36, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Underground?

message: These articles are all or mostly marked stub, but there really isn't a lot of potential for expansion, and a lot of text repeats between them. I suggest they all be merged into a single article - David Gerard 15:55, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. The principal information in each article (the general description and the list of stations) is different, and the articles are widely linked from station articles. Merging them would make it difficult to target these links. -- Chris j wood 20:45, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Travelcard Zone articles

message: Previous discussions seemed to come to halt with Travelcard Zone n in place, which I am still unhappy with.
As it stands we have:
; Travelcard Zone X
: Pros
:* Used in some official literature.
:* Implies transport system.
: Cons
:* "Travelcard" doesn't distinguish it as London's system. I imagine other systems with zones also have travelcards.
:* Not in common usage.
; Zone X (London)
: Pros
:* Common usage followed by parenthesised disambiguation term. Widely used Wikipedia naming convention.
: Cons
:* Has parentheses, not as neat.
:* Transport system not implied.
; London fare Zone X
: Pros
:* Descriptive, no parentheses.
:* Implies transport system (sort of).
: Cons
:* Debate over capitalisation.
:* Not in common usage.
My preference is the Zone X (London), as it best fits the Wikipedia naming policy (assuming common usage to be common usage by Londoners, as they represent most usage). Anything more than Zone X just sounds wrong, and the addition of London in parentheses is enough to disambiguate from any other zonal systems. ed g2s • talk 02:21, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I prefer the status quo on the basis that change will yield no benefit. MRSC 17:31, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name revisisted

message: Changes in layout made to this article should be reflected in Travelcard Zone 5 and Travelcard Zone 5 which share the same style. 2, 3 & 4 have lists yet to be turned into tables. It would be good to get these last three done soon so the articles are of similar quality.  MRSC 08:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes in layout
Talk:Royal Regiment of Canadian Artillery

message: "On 20 October 1871, the Royal Canadian Artillery formed the first regular Canadian army units when they created two batteries of garrison artillery; thus, that date is considered the regiment's birthday."
:This sentence seems to say that the regiment founded itself.  Shouldn't the reference to Royal Canadian Artillery instead be to the Royal Artillery?  I think this is what the earlier version of the sentence was meaning when it said "The Royal Regiment".  Cjrother 18:53, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Could the two batteries have been formed separately of the RA's structure by the Dominion Government? To avoid confusion, maybe it could be rephased as: "On 20 October 1871, the first regular Canadian army units were created, in the form of two batteries of garrison artillery; thus, that date is considered the regiment's birthday." SoLando (Talk) 05:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made your suggested change to the article since no one seemed to mind or have any other suggestions.  Cjrother 19:06, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done!  We're getting some good information on this page.  I now encourage all gunners (and other interested people) to develop the articles of their units.  Ubique.  Brent Woods 01:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: Greetings all!  I noticed that all of the batteries have been labeled as "th", which to my understanding is incorrect. The number of the Battery is simply used. EG) Five Four Battery as opposed to 54th Battery or The Five Four Battery of the Fifty Sixth Field Regiment (ETC)
I could certainly be wrong about this, but thought I'd throw it in... 69.156.155.90 (talk) 22:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "*th" VS "Number" 

message: It appears that the 39th Field Battery Royal Canadian Artillery from Lethbridge Alberta is missing, or in the Independent Batteries section is mislabeled as 20th see http://digitallibrary.uleth.ca/cdm/ref/collection/lhs/id/2176 
107.77.195.183 (talk) 22:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  39th Field Battery Royal Canadian Artillery  
Talk:Mygalomorphae

message: The photo posted on this page, titled simply Mygalomorph, is the same photo that is used in the page for the sub-order Araneomorph, titled with the species Sphodros rufines.
That correct, just as a human could be an example of a primate and also of the genus Homo and also as the species sapiens. P0M 23:55, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That not correct, as Mygalomorph and Araneomorph are mutually exclusive. You cannot take a human as an example of genus Pongo . 194.174.76.21 (talk) 18:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo confusion
Talk:Logic bomb

message: Article listed on WP:VFD Jul 8 to Jul 15 2004, consensus was to keep.  Discussion:
*Keep, and move to cleanup it should be expanded not deleted. theresa knott 19:48, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: "Software that is inherently malicious, such as viruses and worms"
Viruses are not software - they attach themselves to files
:Non all viruses do it, most of them just are files. However, the definition "software" means any type of data, no matter if in a specific file or as an attachment or in other forms --Sumail (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  worms and viruses being software 

message: Was the "logic bomb" in Jurrasic Park actually a logic bomb? As Nedry activated it manually via a timer it would appear to be just a specific program that he wrote and activated, rather than a hidden program that activated when specified conditions were met. Cpl Syx [talk] 09:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempted logic bombs 

message: Drop all referances to FICTION.
Include "FIRMWARE" as well.
Golf War I com links.
Harold  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.214.31.132 (talk) 18:01, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dig Deeper 

message: Some example templates would be nice such as the ones in Fork bomb.
Also project examples and some resources could be of interest.
Perhaps adding Logic Bomb to a malware category may be a smart move.
FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 03:01, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  example templates 

message: This might need to be cleaned up a little, but it's above my proficiency level to figure out how. In particular I'm concerned about the usage of "supposedly" and "might've been a hoax". Well what is it? it's not like there aren't sources (so I'm not too worried about Verifiability), but it would be nice if those sources were more definitive, I suppose. Or if we could at least separate certainty from doubt better without using ambiguous words like "supposedly"--Macks2008 (talk) 23:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: see also: a Manual of Style guideline about this, which I just found by coincidence--Macks2008 (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Supposed logic bombing of the Trans-Siberian Pipeline"
Talk:Gretchen Carlson

message: Gaining experience as anchor and reporter for several local network affiliates, ...
Either this phrase was meant to begin "After gaining ..." or it's straight-up promotional language.  
I suggest: 
After gaining experience as anchor and reporter for several local network affiliates, ...
— MaxEnt 13:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promo language in lead 

message: This statement in the lede is probably not true:
“Carlson has interviewed every Presidential candidate and President over the last two decades.”
There are scores of people who have been “presidential candidates” who you’ve never heard of. They filed paperwork to be the candidate of some irrelevant party in one state or another, and may never have gotten on the ballot. Did she interview Virgil Goode, the constitution party’s presidential candidate in 2012? Or Don Blankenship in 2020? Was she even working during the 2020 primaries? Did she interview Jay Inslee and Julian Castro and the two dozen other Democratic candidates? 
More likely, Carlson inteviewed every major party candidate that won the party’s nomination.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.138.121 (talk) 12:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the statement, partially because it hasn't been cited in ten months, and is very likely untrue as asserted above. BusterD (talk) 23:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statement probably not true. 

message: I've tagged many of them. If these assertions are not addressed with sourcing I expect to remove them. BusterD (talk) 00:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are mountains of uncited assertions in this BLP
Talk:Danubian culture

message: painted pottery? which culture is this? Painted Lengyel? but this is later than stroked pottery
--Yak 17:10, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Yak. Sadly, my Dictionary of Archaeology didn't go into more detail. I Googled to try and corroborate the phasing and found this (para 3) which seemed to back it up, so I went with it. To be honest I only wrote the article as a result of fleshing out celt (tool) so I certainly wouldn't object to any emendations you want to make. adamsan  17:46, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It seems that there is no fair treatment of the issue of the Gynocentric Old Europe theory espoused by Gimbutas. While she did contribute much to the subject of Proto-Indo-Europeans and has been partly vindicated, to my limited knowledge, on the Kurgan hypothesis, there is no evidence of Matriarchal societies in pre-historic Europe. At best Neolithic Europe was less Patriarchal than Proto-Indo-Europeans. This appears to me to be serving only those who wish to put the hoe/plough in place of the Battle-Axe.
One can be a feminist and treat history objectively without looking through the feminist lens, at least at first. When you do the former, you are limiting your intellectual horizons and your actual understanding of ancient cultures.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.107.154 (talk) 03:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marija Gimbutas - Matriarchy insert
Talk:Jacques Futrelle

message: Excellent! --Joefutrelle 17:40, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, it seems there's a problem with the not shown image Image:Jacques Futrelle.JPG. Maybe someone can fix this, because I do not really know how to handle this template. greetings from Berlin, Germany, Osik --77.128.52.166 07:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of Jacques Futrelle
Talk:Canadian federal election results (1960–1979)

message: I've reverted this page to remove my own changes.  I realize that these summary pages of federal elections were starting to look like the pages for the individual elections, i.e., the tables contain the same info. I'm now working on a different summary chart that will show a party's progress over the time period of the summary page. Kevintoronto 17:46, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Japan Amusement Machine and Marketing Association

message: What is JVS (JAMMA Video System)? Is it another name for the JAMMA wiring standard, or is it something else entirely? Luvcraft 18:05, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: JVS
Talk:Triclopyr

message: This is apparently also the active ingredient in SBK.
http://www.pitchcare.com/shop/amateur-and-domestic-weed-killers/sbk-brushwood-killer-1l.html
86.129.116.42 (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: SBK another triclopyr product?

message: Need info. on health effects on humans, especially.
Triclopyr is not regulated as a (human) toxic substance in California, which probably means that it has negligible human toxicity. However, the so-called "inert ingredients" of the various formulations may be toxic.67.170.238.175 (talk) 17:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health effects information needed 

message: The current article text states that triclopyr "...is chemically very similar to the herbicide which it generally replaces, 2,4,5-T..." I wonder if the level of emphasis in this statement (especially the "very") may be misleading, since 2,4,5-T is grouped as a phenoxy herbicide (like 2,4-D, MCPP, and mecoprop) while triclopyr is grouped as a pyridine. Belgrano (talk) 20:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Degree of similarity to 2,4,5-T? 

message: Garlon is not only cyclopyr, redirect is step away. --I.Sáček, senior (talk) 12:26, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garlon 

message: The Mode of Action, MOA, of Triclopyr needs to be determined and Triclopyr incorporated into the article Herbicides, where it is absent unless hiding under a pseudonym. Those in the know, please help. Ex nihil (talk) 20:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mode of Action
Talk:Flen flyys

message: Index of Middle English Verse (IMEV) 808. Will look this up and flesh out the entry when I have a chance. Marnanel 18:17, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Flen flyys is a poem, .... containing the first known written usage in English of the vulgar verb "fuck"
Unless "sometime before 1500" means centuries before, this is incorrect. Chaucer used it quite openly in  the Reeve's Tale in the fourteenth century. Securiger 11:53, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Interesting. "Flen flyss" is cited as the first written in stance in a number of reputable source, including The American Heritage Dictionary. O.E.D. 2nd edition cites its first appearance in current spelling as 1535 ... I find it hard to believe such folks would overlook Chaucer! Are we sure this online source is correct? - DavidWBrooks 12:22, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: A no, mea culpa! I read something about it in Bryson's The Mother Tongue, but misremembered the detail and confused myself with the above link - which is Middle English and a modern translation side-by-side! The word Chaucer uses is "swyve", which is completely synonymous, but not the word in question. Securiger 13:29, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah - *that* explains what Dick Cheney meant when he told Dan Rather to "go swyve yourself" ... - DavidWBrooks 16:31, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is that a true quote? @@ 03:43, 18 November 2004 User:213.112.113.68
*Chaucer wrote "swyve". The accompanying translation into modern English has "fuck". Anthony Appleyard 16:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Where can I find the poem? 23:16, 30 October 2006) User:154.20.120.242
How about the whole poem?  Where can it be found?
Shouldn't the entry read "This poem, which is purported to be written in 1475 though not authenticated . . ." Instead of saying that it was written about 1475.  Without any authentication it may well be nothing but a very clever fake.  And shouldn't it delete that it is famous, since it seems to be a recent sudden appearance without any prior provenance? 64.61.221.153 (talk) 16:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Bell P-59 Airacomet

message: There are a number of surviving P-59As, so just mentioning the example at the Museum of the USAF is inadequate. The P-59A in the Milestones of Flight Gallery at the National Air and Space Museum is more notable. Willy Logan 21:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I put that there.  The reason I didn't add others is because I didn't know of others.  I am certainly not saying that this is the most important museum that has a P-59, in fact, I intended for the list to be expanded by other editors.  If you know of other locations, please add them.  There aren't that many aerospace museums around that you couldn't just list all of them that have a P-59.  That way if someone reads this article, they might find a place nearby where they can see one.   --Rogerd 21:36, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surviving P-59As 

message: http://untoldvalor.blogspot.com/2007/07/funny-story-about-uss-first-jet.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.189.217.40 (talk) 02:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amusing (apochryphal?) story about the P-59 

message: The wind tunnel model shown is actually a model of the Bell XP-52.
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.160.162.242 (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2013
: Which, "picture of the wind tunnel model"? I can't see any such photo here. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of the wind tunnel model is incorrect. 
Talk:Morris (cartoonist)

message: Morris was born in Kortrijk, West Flanders. I think his family was very probably Flemish, although French-speaking (which is not unusual, certainly not in Kortrijk/Courtrai and in those days). The family name De Bevere is common in Flanders, so I think it should be spelt 'De Bevere' and not 'de Bévère'. -- KS
:Yep, certainly De Bevere. See e.g.  (in Dutch). Fram 11:54, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Hi, I added the anecdote about his math teacher.  My father was in the same class as Morris, and told me the anecdote.  I have no written reference.  Is this allowable?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.212.93.97 (talk) 19:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anecdote

message: I finished translation of this article to Czech. How would I add this version of article without changing any links or something to the leftside list of languages? Thanks. Codeholder.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codeholder (talk • contribs) 22:40, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Qustion

message: "assisted them with founding their Mad magazine at EC Comics"
A very obvious mistranslation from French. The verb "assister" doesn't mean "assist". 2A02:AA1:162A:88E4:AC52:276A:46E5:B04 (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  assisted in the founding of Mad
Talk:Tree-adjoining grammar

message: This article would greatly benefit from some concrete examples. -- Beland 13:48, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples? 

message: I would be very grateful for an explanation in some detail, why Tree-adjoining grammars are mildly context-sensitive, and not just context free and not fully context sensitive. I definetly support the cry for examples. graphic ones were especially great. Phelixxx 11:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details 

message: Same thing as with Indexed Grammars: I'd like a formal definition, or several for the different flavors. Could someone who is familiar with the formalism provide one/some? UKoch (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition?
Talk:Kill or Cure (1962 film)

message: Disputed the implied source of the term "Kill or Cure" as the Keeley Institute. The term has been in use in British and American English since at least the 1700s, so it's more likely that the "Keeley Cure" was playfully referred to as kill or cure, rather than the other way around.
Pez (talk) 09:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kill or Cure term
Talk:Ralph Griswold

message: I'm not sure that the statement that SNOBOL is primitive by 21st century standards is supportable.  While it's true that SNOBOL was card oriented, as were FORTRAN and COBOL, many have noted that SNOBOL pattern matching has advantages to facilities in more "modern" programming languages.
Perhaps an expanded comment about it being card oriented would be appropriate, or maybe such a discussion belongs in SNOBOL.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JordanHenderson (talk • contribs) 12:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: SNOBOL4 is one-of-a-kind. It is so unlike anything then or now that it can't be classed as advanced or primitive. It's just ... different. People may well consider its flow-of-control to be primitive but that's like saying that Prolog's flow-of-control is primitive. It's only primitive if you ignore the automatic backtracking. SNOBOL has that same automatic backtracking in the pattern matching -- plus it has several different kinds of goto including a computed goto which is capable of transfer to dynamically created labels. As far as gotos are concerned that's pretty advanced. -- Derek Ross | Talk 06:14, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: SNOBOL primitive by today's standards?
Talk:NSA product types

message: I temporarily removed "However, in 2003 the U.S. Government certified the widely available AES algorithm for Type 1 encryption when used in an NSA approved device."—I think AES is classed as Type 3; I've never heard it classed as Type 1, even though it can be used for the encryption of TOP SECRET material with the longer key lengths. Could you cite some sources for this? Thanks. — Matt 22:18, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right that the list of algorithms should probably be moved to its own page and that we should empathize systems over algorithms. However, "Type 1 algorithm" and "Type 1 encryption" are actually in pretty common usage. Also, the original categorization from FED-STD-whatever was product/product/algorithm/algorithm, which is random and inconsistent, particularly considering that Type 3 products being whole systems is the entire point of FIPS 140... I'll dig up what I have on dates, etc. User:inkling
Doesn't NSA use Roman numerals (I/II/III)?
=== No References ===
Since the article has been tagged since 02/2008 as having no references (for obvious lack of unclassified sources), I'm going to remove the unsourced info. Mmernex (talk) 20:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since the article has been tagged since 02/2008 as having no references (for obvious lack of unclassified sources), I'm going to remove the unsourced info. Mmernex (talk) 20:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No References 

message: I would like to propose renaming this page NSA product types and merging in Type 2 product, Type 3 product and Type 4 product. There is not enough material available for four separate articles and our readers would be better served if the articles are merged.--agr (talk) 23:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename and merge
Talk:Mariana Trench

message: Currently this page and the Challenger Deep page give different values for the maximum depth, 10,984±25 m versus 10,920 ± 10 m. The pages should be consistent across the project but which number to use? Mikenorton (talk) 11:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How deep? 

message: The article currently states that "At the bottom of the trench, [...] the density of water is increased by 4.96%", without specifying a source. I tried to find a source for this specific value, but everything I could find just used this Wikipedia page as a source. Therefore, I suggest adding a "citation needed" tag for this statement. 88.90.224.145 (talk) 09:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure go ahead. You can add  to the end of the sentence/paragraph. –Novem Linguae (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the article is semi-protected, and I seem to have lost access to my old Wikipedia account, so I cannot perform the edit myself. I would appreciate it if you or someone else with write access to the article could do it for me! 88.90.224.145 (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Q T C 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for the density of water at the bottom