Talk:The Skin Game (1931 film)

message: :Image:Skin Game.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Skin Game.jpg

message: I've removed the statement that the film is currently in the Public Domain, as the US Copyright Office lists the film as having it's US rights restored (see document dated 22/Aug/1997). Davepattern 17:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved and expanded the copyright information to clarify the current status. Nick Cooper (talk) 10:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright status 

message: Removed: "He had been commissioned to transform a stage play into a movie, and stuck strictly to the plot, without adding the same personal flair that stood out in his previous film, Murder!." - the term "personal flair" especially is very vague and POV.
I think something needs to be done about the following passage:
"Hitchcock was bored throughout the making of the Skin Game and spent most of the shoot demonstrating for the cast how he wanted them to act. According to one account, his performances were "much more vivid ... than they ever achieved themselves". The highlight for him was when the stage hands threw Phyllis Konstam into the lily pond; he made them rehearse this at least ten times." 
The tone of this is very biased and almost sarcastic, and the claims made are vague and unverified. Did Hitch say he was bored? Whose "account" was that quote "according to"? Is it verifiable to say that was the highlight for him? I will just put a bunch of citation needed tags in there, but I feel like the whole passage should be radically revised or just removed. I think the claim that Hitchcock "made" the crew repeatedly throw an actress into a pond, apparently for his own amusement, is quite a significant one that should be properly sourced or removed. Hopefully someone more knowledgable than I can provide citations and save this article's credibility... Omgplz (talk) 09:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that.  Hitchcock was certainly less happy with his job at the time (due to the high work load BIP were imposing on him), but I can't recall ever reading those statements before.  I'll check through the major Hitchcock books to see if they backup any of the claims. 161.112.232.17 (talk) 14:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV