lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cerritos, California/to do

message: * Review comments from Peer review
* Review comments from Failed Featured article candidates
Objections need to be resolved (peer review) - 27 Nov 2004 (UTC):
# The landmarks section is huge, and questionably encyclopedic (Update: fixed)
# Much of the information towards the bottom is Rambot data, with little or no changes made to it
# The page is full of unnecessary stuff. Check out the featured city articles that have made the cut
Objection need to be resolved (featured articles candidates) - 28 June 2005:
# It is too detailed for a single article. (Update: better to be detailed than to be lacking)
# The local landmarks section should be broken out into another article or set of articles, retaining two or three of the main ones.
# There are too many pictures; there should only be a few, and they should be larger. (Update: pictures reduced in number)
# The article seems mostly like a listing of discrete and not terribly-related buildings, projects, etc.
# There certainly doesn't need to be three sections for individual high schools. Even one high school should not have a section unless it has had a significant impact in the world's awareness of Cerritos, which is not apparent from the article. (Update: fixed)
# All in all, this seems more like a brochure or travel guide than an encyclopedia article (Update: diction modifications)
# Some of the photos have questionable copyright status as they have been taken from the City of Cerritos' website
# Some of the text is questionable since some of it has been directly copied from the website.
# Needs to be divided into separate articles.
# Too many, too small images with a bad layout (Update: images reduced in number)
#* Also, pictures are too small (cited several times)
# unencyclopedic wording in many places of the article (the city takes prides in its beautification..., Cerritos' tradition of intelligent, progressive government is reflected in its civic facilities., etc...) (Update: reduced);
# many lists ("City beautification", "Notable characteristics") (Update: modified);
# structural problems ("Tournament of Roses Parade" has the same heading level as "Geography" and "Demographics" (Update: fixed)
# some sections are also out of place: the "Landmarks" section should be put after "Geography" and "Demographics", and could probably use a renaming) (Update: fixed);
# insufficient references (the single web-based reference is also ill-formatted);
# inappropriate lead (Update: fixed).
# Add information about the Little India as the area is called and Indian influence on the area. (Response to request: Consider adding the Little India information in the City of Artesia article because that is where the ethnic enclave is located).(Even though Artesia is the place, the Indian community (me included) calls the general area "Cerritos" and not "Artesia". That is the reason I came looking here and not there. A one liner on this article will help...may be link to Artesia on that line. Thanks for the response. - Ganeshk (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Major Reuben Colburn House

message: This entry for a historic house classified as a landmark has become an extensive biography of its owner. Almost all the information here can be used to make an entry for Colburn himself (which ironically does not exist). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sushi Cowboy (talk • contribs) 19:10, 9 November 2005.
:It does now. See Reuben Colburn. BrownCow • (how now?) 17:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I'm the author. The more the merrier. Looks good. Sources are available so feel free to add them if valid.Marky48 (talk) 16:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yacón

message: I removed some of the text from the Culture section because it sounded too much like a how-to guide. It still seems that way a bit, but I think it's better now. Mycota 19:26, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture 

message: *  Mimeograph, 9 tables, 11 figures, 27 p. 
* 
* 
* 
* 
*  (Also available in Spanish.)
* 
*  31 pages. (Available in Spanish.)
* 
*  60 p.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Knorrepoes (talk • contribs).
I've restored the references with the links commented out. There's no policy that says you can only cite references that are available over the Web. I left them as HTML comments in case CIP restores them or they prove otherwise useful for finding new URLs for them later. Waitak 12:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other references

message: I would strongly suggest that the title of this page be corrected to read "Yacon" without the diacritics (accent). Yacon is a word from indigenous South American people, which has been adopted in the Spanish-Latin American lexicon. However, in English this crop is referred to by the widely accepted name "yacon" without diacritics. All the scientific articles in the English language use "yacon", and also a Google search shows that yacon is overwhelmingly the term of choice in English. Has anyone reasoned objections to correcting the spelling?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NusHub (talk • contribs) 16:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Diacritics in article title
Talk:Jimmy Lange

message: On a recent episode of "HomeWreckers" with Ryan Dunn from "Viva La Bam" a guy is seen wearing a 'Jimmy Lange' shirt.  This was on MTV.
The page says he has 30 fights and that his record is 29-2-2.  How is that possible?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.20.221.71 (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Birthday party

message: There was one vote for "MAKE INTO A DISAMBIG PAGE" -- by Gruntness.  There were three merge votes, six redirect votes, and twelve keep votes.  Even if you disallow socks (a good idea), I have a hard time seeing how "disambig" was the consensus.  Cleduc 19:42, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Moreover, from what is it disambiguating? --redstucco 09:16, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  It appears that The Birthday Party is already the appropriate disambiguation page.  Cleduc 16:54, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote results
Talk:Creation Spirituality

message: Please see my explanations for changes made to this entry at the Talk:Matthew Fox (priest) page. Thanks. WikiSceptic 19:47, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

message: What term do we use for creation spirituality? It's not a denomination or a cult. Is it a new religious movement? A spiritual system? 67.170.55.241 18:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  new religious movement? 

message: The ordinary message when templates are added, and as usual I find nothing here, no explanation, nothing! It's very easy to complain, but seemingly it's very hard to explain what is wrong. For now I'm deleting the notability issue. In answer to the sloppy no-explanation attitude, I should not motivate myself, but still I do: googling for "Creation spirituality" "Matthew Fox" gives 14800 hits. That's much more than for Darian calendar, or for Technetium star. The notability issue timed out (3 months), and cannot be motivated. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 19:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:GOOGLEHITS is not evidence of notability. The topic needs substantial coverage in reliable third party sources. As for Darian calendar & Technetium star, this is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (the former appears to be very badly sourced and should be deleted, the latter is referenced to what appears to be a scholarly source). HrafnTalkStalk 02:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "multiple issues see talk page!"
Talk:Water dispute

message: what is this about with this water dispute in egypit i belive
Please sign your questions and comments. Thank you Jd6905a (talk) 16:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

message: I propose to merge Water conflict into this article as in general these topics are interrelated and have some overlapping. It is very hard to make distinction between dispute and conflict. Merging of these two articles will make more comprehensive coverage of the topic. Beagel (talk) 13:25, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support merging "Water dispute" into "Water conflict."  In my experience, the latter is much more common among the academic community.  vs. . It's probably a minor issue.—DMCer™ 00:07, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, I have nothing against if merged this way. Beagel (talk) 05:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments

message: "CLIA is funded by user fees." Who are the users? GangofOne 20:00, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that the labs pay the fee. Joaquin Murietta 23:12, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And it is obligatory that a lab pay the fees  to legally provide the services, if I am understanding correctly. Of course the costs are passed on to the speciment-bearers. So it's just a cost of doing business for the labs. (I just trying to understand how things are set up.) GangofOne 23:25, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  definitely passed onto the consumer! Thanks. Joaquin Murietta 07:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should be included in the article for the regulations, as there are no citations here to any statute. Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 20:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act, 1988]] into [[Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments]] 

message: Stub article with no citations Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 20:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act, 1988]] into [[Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments]]
Talk:Stanford University School of Medicine

message: 5/17/09. Edited out some stuff on Match ranking and percentages, as I was unable to find a source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.169.59.203 (talk) 01:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally needs to be rewritten, but a few edits ago, it was clearly written by someone who was strongly biased against Stanford Med, so I suspect the natural flow of Wiki will erode the POV in due time. Also, I don't think getting an MD-PhD is the most important thing the world needs to know about SMS. jengod 21:25, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says "In 1870 Cooper's nephew, Levi Cooper Lane, established a new campus at the intersection of Webster and Sacramento Streets in 1882; at that time, the school was christened Cooper Medical College." This is unclear. If there was one significant event in 1870 and another in 1882, the article should describe both of them and say which happened when. If there was just one event, then the incorrect date should be removed.
: Corrected and that section rewritten (dropping some details since this is suppose to be a summary).  Lane took over the institution in 1870 but moved and renamed in 1882.  --Erp (talk) 05:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1870 or 1882?
Talk:George Edgar Slusser

message: I'm trying to remove links to the vector disambiguation page, but can't see where the link from this page (under Storm Warnings in the Bibliography) should go? Any hints appreciated! --Pak21 20:16, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vector

message: Can anybody claim it? 2604:3D09:D78:1000:FD50:C857:AC27:E41F (talk) 08:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the wikipedia standard for being a "scholar"?
Talk:River Slea

message: Quote: "The Hub (the largest arts & crafts gallery outside London)".
Question: Is this really true? - There is an awful lot of world outside London. (RJP 20:17, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the operative bit is 'arts and crafts'.  It is now the National centre for arts and crafts, and probably is the largest dedicated t a minor category. --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 13:48, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michael Laski

message: Is this guy any relation to Harold Laski? —Chowbok 20:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Asking the same question in 2022. At this point, we should ask if he is still alive. JimFarm (talk) 18:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harold Laski 

message: Lasci is mostly known from the Joan Didion article, he’s not really “notable” 2600:1016:B00D:20D:98E6:A52C:445F:2082 (talk) 07:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently I created this article 17 years ago, holy cow. I have no comments one way or another wrt to its deletion. Kthejoker (talk) 23:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

text: I don't think a merger is a good idea. There's a reasonable amount of material on Laski as distinct from his party, some of which, from mainstream sources, I added this morning. I haven't even checked the LA Free Press yet b/c it's not especially searchable, but if the LAT and the Sentinel have a few pieces the Free Press ought to have some too, and more detail.Central and Adams (talk) 11:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be merged with the article about his party
Talk:Jedi interceptor

message: There's another article on Advanced Jedi starfighter which is exactly the same as this one... I'm wondering if it's a good idea to merge the two together, especially since there's more stuff (a picture for example) on the other site. Axel Driken
*It sounds like a fine idea to me.  Certainly we don't need two articles on the subject.  Why not just be bold and do it yourself?  =)  (The only thing I would comment on is that "Jedi Interceptor" is probably the article name we ought to keep--it's simplest and gets the point across.)  Marblespire 04:40, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with another article
Talk:New Hall Valley Country Park

message: I am going to the park soon to take some photos for this article, I may get some photos of the estates nearby and plants brook. I live nearby so it won't take long. - (Erebus555 20:28, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You took long enough! ;-) Andy Mabbett 13:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, sorry! I've been busy for so long and I just went out today armed with the camera and went on a tour of Sutton town centre! It's not best picture - I'm still having problems with my camera. - Erebus555 13:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So I see, er , I mean, er, never mind... ;-) Andy Mabbett 20:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I propose to merge New Hall Valley into this article - the two articles cover very similar ground, and the little information that is in that article that isn't in this one can easily be incorporated.  An optimist on the run!  20:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Gavbadger (talk) 00:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Support. Technochoc (talk) 20:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Global Expeditions

message: I am not sure why this article was nominated to be checked for neutrality. I feel that this article is simply informational and does not promote or advocate any particular point of view.
:If this was for a commercial organisation, in the strict sense of the phrase, it would be considered advertising. If it is allowed an exemption, then the phrase "around the world to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ." is not neutral. To a non-christian such as myself, this line is both offensive and expresses a POV. There are other ways of stating this phrase without assuming that all readers are christians or that all readers wish to be evangelised. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:44, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

message: maybe this should be made into its own page instead of a redirect to teen mania
--Jammin.all.night 21:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Before this should be made into its own page it needs to have the first criteria for notability fulfilled WP:N.  In its current form it needs to be re-redirected back to Teen Mania. Idioma 21:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Teen Mania mission trip program (that they've named "Global Expeditions") receives mention, from time to time, in small newspapers in the U.S., usually in the form of a small piece along the lines of "local teen goes on mission trip." Some easily located examples: , .  Of course, the current article, like the Honor Academy and Teen Mania articles, is already little more than an insider's collection of organizational details and promotional snippets that should be replaced with something that sensibly and coherently explains what the organization does and why and how they do it. Some of that explaining has been attempted in the Battle Cry Campaign article, based on news coverage, telecasts and material related to that campaign, but I know of no significant similar body of published works specifically covering "Global Expeditions" that could support such an article at the moment. Mike Doughney 01:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have gone ahead and redirected with possibilities to Teen Mania.  If the section on Global Expeditions grows too large in Teen Mania it can then be moved here, but as for now this article cannot stand on its own. Idioma 03:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  possibly made into its own page?
Talk:Norton, Ohio

message: The article says that Norton is partly in Wayne County but there is no reference supporting that.  If it is in Wayne County it would have to be out of Chippewa Township, but looking at their zoning map from January 2014 the borders are intact.  Could someone add a reference if there is one? --Beirne (talk) 02:08, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the official map of Norton and it does not include Wayne County. I'm taking Wayne County out. --Beirne (talk) 03:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: See the Census Bureau citation: a small part of the city is located in Wayne County.  It's quite small, as can be seen from the tiny number of Norton residents living in Wayne County, but if it were only in Summit County, it wouldn't be listed in Wayne and couldn't have residents who live in Wayne County.  Nyttend (talk) 13:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There are seven Census Bureau citations. Do you want to tell me which one has the fact? And better yet, make the citation in the article? --Beirne (talk) 00:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

text: I found a reference on the Wayne County page and made a citation for it in the article. --Beirne (talk) 01:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wayne County?
Talk:Rajput/Archive 13

message: DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between 02 November 2005 and 09 November 2005.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are
replying to if necessary.
Please add new archivals to Talk:Rajput/Archive14. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. خرم Khurram 20:51, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

message: :Goethean,
:I know that, and I appreciate your efforts to combat zealotry, incivility, and bad writing on this page. However I think that previous versions of the article contained a lot more useful information than the current one, yet weren't over-long, and that splitting the page in two has diminished the amount of useful information here for readers. No one really argued that the history section I restored was factually incorrect or biased, or irrelevant to the topic, and removing it from the article hasn't protected the page from continued abuse by semi-literate chauvinists. The History of Rajputs article is subject to the same abuse, so I am not sure that anything has been gained by omitting the history section from this page. Tom Radulovich 20:07, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think that the only controversy on the History of Rajputs page is whether Akbar is to be called "the Great". That seems minor to me. — goethean ॐ 21:12, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: tom's edit 

message: The above is quite interesting read. It's relevance in terms of asserting any light onto the current discussion is questionable though. Good find Khurram. Keep up the good work--Raja 21:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting info
Talk:Leiomyoma

message: 1-hyperestrogenism.
2.low parity and nullipara.
3-+ve genitic history.
4-black races.
5-obesity.
I would like to add a very descriptive multimedia link as an external link to this article. http://www.uterine-fibroids.org/index.html
This description of utering fibroids and MR Guided Focused Ultra Sound is of great interest to patients and doctors alike. Please confirm your agreement.
AIMSzpc 15:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be soliciting business, and it isn't directly related to Leiomyoma, so I'd recommend against it. --Arcadian 17:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''what causes myoma?''' 
Talk:Citral

message: The wiki article on Orange (fruit) states that "Orange peel contains citral, an aldehyde that antagonises the action of vitamin A. Therefore anyone eating citrus peels should make certain that their dietary intake of vitamin A is sufficient."
This information does not appear in the article on citral. Sah64 (talk) 22:46, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency with wiki article on Orange (fruit) 
Talk:Lackfi family

message: The article contradict itself. First it states that the family was a Croatian-Hungarian, but in the later text there is no connection with Croatia. In stead of the text suggests that the family is clearly from an old Hungarian clan.
: Yes, I think the article is perhaps a bit Croatian-biased. It is a Hungarian noble family. While they family did rule in Croatia (but not exclusively), it was done during the period when Croatia was in union with Hungary, and ruled by the Hungarian king. Thus they were Hungarian nobles who's power was granted by the Hungarian king. Even if it was over Croatian soil. I'd like to change the article to use the name Lackfi, but that might be perceived by some as switching a Croatian bias for a Hungarian one. I'll check up if there's guidelines for this stuff. --BluePlatypus 10:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Croatian origin? 

message: The connection between Kán and Lackfi family is in dispute. According to , the ancestor of the Lackfi family is László (Lack), sometimes called Kerekegyházi Lack , fl 1323-59.  He was the son of Dénes from the clan Hermán/Hermány, not (as previously thought) of László II Kán, the Voivode of Transylvania. 
Hollomis 16:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kán family origin 

message: "At the end of the 19th century some members of the Lacković family settled in Romania near the Danube and alongside local nobility helped form the new burgeoisie of the then emerging new state of Romania. Along with the arriving of the communist regime in Romania, they sufered a severe set-back, having all their estates confiscated and also sent to prison for political reasons. Descendants form the romanian branch of the House of Lacković still live in present-day Romania."
Sources?
The Lackfi de Simontornya,Kerekegyháza family never used the name Lackovic.
Alexandru Paleologu - Politetea ca arma - 2000
Neagu Djuvara - Între Orient şi Occident. Ţările române la începutul epocii moderne, Editura Humanitas, 1995
They were talking about a branch of the family coming from Croatia and in this situation the use of the name Lackovic is understandable.
"The Lackfi died out in 1421. However there are some more family with this name, but they are not related."
How come ? Do you have some serious sources for this ? Or is it just a suposition ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seleos (talk • contribs) 11:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ??