lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:South Petherton

message: A large addition was made to this article today by User:Rustwood which appears to have copy & pasted sections from  but some changes have been made - therefore it is not a complete copyvio so I have added the banner and reported it at Wikipedia:Copyright problems in the hope that someone more experienced at dealing with these issues can take a look. If you can help please do.— Rod talk 21:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now drafted a new version of the whole article at Talk:South Petherton/Temp which I believe contains all of the encyclopedic content from the addition (removing the POV & weasel words) but is sourced from a variety of books & web sites etc & I believe can now be transferred (by an admin) to the main article.— Rod talk 12:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged your revision with the older versions. Since you did retain some of the text of the original, we can't delete it, or we would ourselves be in violation of copyright. :) (By GFDL, our contributors do not release their rights to authorship credit.) Thanks for bringing these concerns up at WP:CP. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyvio problem 

message: Whist South Petherton might have been a town in the past, I'm not sure it can be described as such today. The parish council is not a town council for a start. And a search online gives far more examples of the place being described as a village than a town. Argovian (talk) 16:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town or village 
Talk:Somerton and Frome (UK Parliament constituency)

message: How often has this constituency had the highest election turnout in the UK?--85.164.223.109 (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  High turnout? 

message: Votes do not add up (60,309) to the turnout figure given. Neil W (talk) 18:39, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turnout figure
Talk:Somerset Place, Bath

message: I suggest moving this page to "Somerset Place, Bath" as the use of brackets in article titles is discouraged by Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles) and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (architecture). It would also make the title consistent with road naming elsewhere and sort out :Category:Streets in Bath. Does anyone have any objections?— Rod talk 15:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming proposal
Talk:Museum of Somerset

message: The museum has now closed and will re open in 2010 as the "Museum of Somerset" - should we rename/move this article & if so at what point?— Rod talk 19:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? Rename for museum reopening 
Talk:Healthcare in the Republic of Ireland

message: I need a copy of the birth certificate of my Mother Miss Mary Ellen Kearney, born 20th January 1916.  When I applied for my first Irish Passport, I was told by Your Office, that she was born in a Workhouse in Dublin.  Date of my passport was 10th February 2005. The only lady registered on this date was her Mother who was in the workhouse in Dublin.  Therefore I do not have any birth details of my dear Mother who passed away on 23rd October 2007, in Kingston Hospital, Surrey, ENGLAND. 2A02:C7C:A81B:DC00:B0A3:1591:38E2:E097 (talk) 14:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 6.5 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for asking questions related to using or contributing to Wikipedia itself. Thus, we have no special knowledge about the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the upper right side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Certificate of My Mother born in IRELAND
Talk:Fenella Woolgar

message: Is she any relation to Jack Woolgar from The Web of Fear? DavidFarmbrough 13:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve GOT to admit, I JUST heard Fenella on a trailer for a Radio 4 show: and immediately thought the same thing … !   I can’t see anything on the pair’s websites.Cuddy2977 (talk) 09:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Relations

message: I wasn't sure where to start and I know some of this isn't in Wiki format. This looks more like her CV than the way a Wiki article should be? 142.147.58.213 (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a trim
Talk:Keystone module

message: The term keystone as described here does not appear to have any origins.
It also appears to be a term adopted in the US for a particular type of connector shape or size.
I can find no information about the jack size or shape anywhere.
Rather than being a descriptive word i would suggest that this is a makers named item.
Certainly not at all recognised in Europe. And the information herewith is minimal.
--81.137.234.49 17 September 2007
:I've tried to provide more information as well as photos.  I don't know if this is US specific, but keystones do appear to be widely available across the Internet from many different suppliers and manufacturers, and the term "keystone" is almost universally used by everybody for this format.  I also can not find any reference to the history or an official specification.  However I have run across a few different spec summaries which may provide some information.  It appears as if the front rectangular face is 14.5mm wide by 16.0mm tall.  The catch plane of the tabs which hold it in place (on the top and bottom) are offset 8.0mm back from the front face of the keystone and are 19.2mm apart vertically (the extra 3.2mm allowing for compression of the tabs during insertion). - Dmeranda (talk) 21:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of term and specs
Talk:Shelter from the Storm

message: As written, this article seems shallow and uninformative. It could be helped significantly by adding content relating to the various interpretations of the "meaning" of the song, and how and why it came to be written. 
Seamusdemora (talk) 12:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shallow and uninformative
Talk:Agat (computer)

message: This article seems like it goes into quite some detail concerning the architecture of the Agat, particularly as concerns the microprocessor:
*AF Ioffe - Massive personal computer series "Agate" / №1, 1984 Массовые персональные ЭВМ серии «Агат». А Ф. Иоффе
It's quite extensively cited on the topic (including by the Russian version of this article), but I can't seem to find it online.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:09, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The title of the article, " Массовые персональные ЭВМ серии «Агат»" ought to be translated more like "Consumer-grade personal computers of the "Agat" series". (Массовые  = "produced for the mass market") Vmenkov (talk) 01:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

text: That was the basis for much of my creation of this article, but unfortunately, there is no inline sourcing of the Russian version and many of the sources do not seem to be available online (at least to me as an English speaker with only rudimentary Russian).  I wasn't really prepared to add content that I couldn't source here.  If one of our contributors located in Russia can track down the sourcing and expand the article significantly, I would be giddy with excitement =).  Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Architecture Details

message: How many Agats were manufactured?   Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many? 

message: If the Agat came with a Cyrillic character set, maybe there should be an article on Wikipedia about that.
Did the graphics modes work like the Apple II?
If you set bit 7, and stored a byte to the character output routine, or screen memory, did it appear to flash?   Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 08:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curious about characters 
Talk:Sand Point, Somerset

message: The two articles Sand Point, Somerset and Middle Hope are about the same place. Middle Hope is described as being on Sand Point. Both are owned/managed by the National Trust (which has one info page about them. However Middle Hope has separate designation as an SSSI and therefore a unique data sheet. I would suggest merging the articles into one, covering both at Sand Point and Middle Hope.— Rod talk 12:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As there were no comments or objections I have now done the merge.— Rod talk 10:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Lynton

message: I would like to suggest the addition of an external link to http://www.visitlynton.co.uk/ Visit Lynton & Lynmouth
(As also outlined to Bob), this link is not spam:
The site is not directly profiting anyone although is of course there to help the whole town. In part it IS a commercial link, but it is within the wikipedia rules in that it is not at all obscure and is very very relevent. More importantly it also contains very relevent further reading information in the visitlynton.co.uk/about section, which is being added to.
Other suggested changes:
I suggest the reference to the Tarka Trail is removed. The trail was originally promoted as going through the area, however has not been promoted as such for many years and there is no reference to it in the towns. 
ref - http://www.devon.gov.uk/tarkatrail
http://www.sustrans.org.uk/sustrans-near-you/south-west/easy-rides-in-the-south-west/tarka-trail
http://www.northdevonbiosphere.org.uk/the-tarka-trail/
I suggest an addition is made of the Two Moors Way, which does end at Lynton & Lynmouth, but is not currently mentioned.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Moors_Way
Nikb01 (talk) 02:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lynton suggested updates 
Talk:Ruishton

message: I understand that Lord Hopton, a royalist commander in the English Civil War 1643 - 1646 was at Ruishton Manor possibley because he was involved in the seige of Taunton.  Does Ruishton manor still exsist?  Where is it, if it does? Is there anymore infomation on him there? Text me please 07792515760 and or leave a message here.
Bill.86.177.97.16 (talk) 01:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Royal United Hospital

message: This article has been edited several times over the last few months to remove any less than complimentary information (even though it was appropriately cited) and replaced with more positive information. As a result I have added a banner to highlight potential issues related to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. I am more than happy to work with anyone to produce a balanced and encyclopedic article however I did not appreciate a phone call and email at work attempting to stop me editing the article. I would welcome neutral editors comments and edits to ensure the article provides a balanced source for readers.— Rod talk 13:48, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a bit wrong of them to actually phone you, the IP editors will have no power in putting bias in the article. Replies can be seen at the COI Noticeboard. I was thinking if we should request a page protection? Jaguar (talk) 15:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that page protection may be warranted. I'm very disturbed by the report of pressure being exerted on an editor as Rodw describes. If this isn't dealt with in our policies then it needs to be. ScottyBerg (talk) 17:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest and Neutral Point of View 

message: I'm being bold and changing the claim that helicopters land on the nearby cricket pitch, because it seems terribly unlikely from what I know of cricket groundkeeping - presumably it lands elsewhere on the field (see Cricket field for more on the difference between the two). SamBC(talk) 15:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are right. Thanks. Sorry I got that wrong - it is many years since I last played on a cricket field! Rwendland (talk) 17:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helicopters really land on the pitch?? 

message: The RUH is located in Newbridge (and says so in linking article), an electoral ward directly bordering Weston. The hospital is indeed very close to the historical centre of Weston but that is not the correct suburb. --Stars of 85 (talk) 19:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weston 

message: Royal United Hospital should be Hospitals as it https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/royal-national-hospital-for-rheumatic-diseases-nhs-foundation-trust
77.101.36.43 (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Thanks. Rwendland (talk) 22:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. NiciVampireHeart 10:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 October 2015
Talk:Rodney Stoke

message: Both Nyland and Bradley Cross are in Sedgemoor, so I can't see how they could be part of the Rodney Stoke parish. I'm 99% certain that both are governed by Cheddar Parish Council. --Simple Bob (talk) 08:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on this and this both Council documents I would agree both are in Cheddar civil parish.— Rod talk 13:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Rod. I'm going to move them across to Cheddar. If anyone can find something to prove they belong in Rodney Stoke then I'll happily move them back. I'll also try to find other references to show where they belong. I did look on Sedgemoor's online interactive mapping facility and it clearly shows that both are within Sedgemoor (but doesn't have anything about Parish councils). --Simple Bob (talk) 18:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nyland and Bradley Cross
Talk:Rob Ashford

message: Editor deleted this material  "...attended Washington and Lee University, Lexington Kentucky, in the pre-law program. He became interested in theatre with his work in the theatre department, and went on to study...", with no edit summary and no other explanation. I have restored the maerial and am requesting an explanation. JeanColumbia (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh my, I do not know what to do with this statement, but, I know enough not to get into an WP:EDITWAR, and also not to flirt with WP:3R, so I'll sit back and... JeanColumbia (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

text: I restored the above education material today, but if anyone feels strongly, just delete and I'll certainly not get involved again. I think there was something else here that I responded to back in March '09, but it was deleted.JeanColumbia (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted material regarding education

message: I think I have read somewhere that Wikipedia isn't supposed to take part in predicting the future. I don't tend to "be bold" about deleting material that may be of interest, but I know that in many cases these items tend to get out of date. I was trying to figure out how to edit the page to acknowledge NBC's The Sound of Music Live!, and decided to check whether any of these "future productions" had slipped into the past, or possibly evaporated altogether. Here's what I found, intended to help future editors (other than those with inside information) in figuring out whether edits are called for:
* "a musical version of Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland for Disney": I couldn't find this one
* "Carmen at Houston Grand Opera": according to houstongrandopera.org, scheduled for April 25-May 14, 2014.
* "Barber of Seville at Chicago Lyric Opera": according to lyricoperra.org, February 1-28, 2014
NameIsRon (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  future productions...
Talk:Sour Milk Sea

message: I reverted your recent changes,  and . I've nominated this song article for GA and I'm confused about why you felt the need to make those changes. The referencing style you tagged as unclear is the same one I've used for, at a guess, the vast majority of 40+ GAs I've written or rewritten. When I first work on an article, I'll always go with an established style – if it exists. In the case of "Sour Milk Sea", the only reference in the whole piece before I made my first edit, back in October 2012, was a bare URL. I therefore felt confident in applying a style I was familiar with and already by then had used in GAs.
Speaking of bare URLs, I couldn't see any justification for the tag you added on that issue. We define the term as "a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just the text out of the URL bar of your browser copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between the ref tags or simply provided as an external link, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation." Are there any examples of such a reference?
Regarding some of the changes you made in that first edit. The Rolling Stone citation is to the website – rollingstone.com – as I don't believe the piece appeared in the print magazine. (Put it this way, it's pure assumption to think it did; we're not providing a page number and a date for the magazine's publication – the source is an online piece, dated when the article was posted.) And there is no requirement to insert a full stop/period and then capitalise "retrieved" for access dates. The style throughout the article is to have items separated by commas or semicolons, thereby minimising capitalisation. You linked to Help:Citation Style 1 in that edit. Well, to quote from that page: "Wikipedia does not have a single house style. Editors may choose any option they want; one article need not match what is done in other articles or what is done in professional publications or recommended by academic style guides. However, citations within a given article should follow a consistent style." I'm no fan of the Harvard referencing system, and I don't believe any US system (i.e. the choices available in Wikipedia templates) should be imposed on an article that's BritEng style. On the other hand (to repeat), I will follow whatever's been imposed previously in an article – but, again, that's not relevant here, given the inadequate referencing when I began expanding the article nearly three years ago. JG66 (talk) 16:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes reverted
Talk:Splackavellie

message: I once received a compliment on my Splackavellie work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kapuchinski
I'd like to  keep something in about it being a portmanteau. If someone is looking up Splackavellie, they are thinking "What does that mean?" Let us not deny them information.
I am quoted here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pinikas
Kapuchinski (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: On your Splackavelli work? You might want to read WP:COI. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 00:58, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

message: Considering I'm more invested in this information than you, leave it. Kapuchinski (talk) 04:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, that’s not how it works. Adding something back without addressing the problem doesn’t help your case. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 19:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, in the original discussion, you didn’t actually do anything to prove your case; the only real justification you seem to have is that you were mentioned on someone else’s talk page; that hardly qualifies as a reliable source. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 19:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 
Response to third opinion request:
Hello, I have come to this discussion via Wikipedia:Third opinion where there was a request for a third opinion. I have never edited this article and have come here as a neutral third party. From what I can see on the article's history and this talk page discussion, the disagreement is over this inclusion of the "meaning" section. Arguments for inclusion include that it is informative and does not need sourcing and arguments against inclusion include the argument that the content is unsourced. To address this we should look at Wikipedia:Verifiability, which is Wikipedia's policy for verifiability on articles. The "This page in a nutshell" blurb sums up the policy well:  The idea that the content is unsourced and therefore was removed is one that is supported by that policy, which says  Being informative is not the criteria for inclusion, it must be supported by reliable sources, especially if it is being challenged. The burden of proof lies with the editor seeking the inclusion of the material. In order for the content to remain in the article, it should be supported by a reliable source that verifies the information; if reliable sources cannot be found then the information should be removed. If we can't point to a reliable source that we are getting the information from, then it is original research which does not belong on Wikipedia. The meaning section makes quite a few claims, and readers of the article need to be able to verify that it's accurate; without reliable sources, they cannot do that. - Aoidh (talk) 22:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looks like we already took it to the talk page.