lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Belarusian grammar

message: It seems that s' & z' are not [ɕ] & [ʑ], at least they are quite different from both Polish si/zi and Russian щ/жж which are [ɕ]/[ʑ]. In the same time they are different from Russian с'/з' which are palatalized [s]/[z]. So I really don't know what Belarusian s' & z' are. --Koryakov Yuri 19:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is quite possible you're right. These IPA definitions may be quite inaccurate, even fictitious, and/or WP:OR'ed. If you have good sources, please make corrections. The 1985 edition of grammar doesn't contain IPA definitions. Yury Tarasievich 22:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

text: You were right, those IPA equivalents of s' and z', and possibly some others, seem to be somebody's invention. The articulation definitions of those look suspicious, too. Yury Tarasievich 22:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Palatalized "s" and "z"

message: I'm not sure about my translation of articulation places in the newly added table. Some of the English terms seem too detailed, and some too generic, to make a undisputable connection to Belarusian terms. Labials were no problem, for others I've used the following translations:
* "пярэднеязычныя зубныя" (lit. front-of-tongue dental) = alveolar
* "пярэднеязычныя пярэднепаднябенныя" (lit. front-of-tongue front-of-palate) = alveolo-palatal
* "сярэднеязычныя сярэднепаднябенныя" (lit. middle-of-tongue middle-of-palate) = palatal
* "заднеязычныя заднепаднябенныя" (lit. back-of-tongue back-of-palate) = glottal/velar
Yury Tarasievich 11:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Help needed
Talk:Pinfall (professional wrestling)

message: The two pages have been proposed for merger since December 2006, and I found no objections on either talk page. I decided to be bold and merge them for myself. I tried to delete any overlap (it was just a couple of sentences), but someone please look over it to make sure I did a satisfactory job. Nikki311 21:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pages merged
Talk:Mount Palung National Park

message: Is there any information on the geology of the Palung range? On Google Earth it does look like an old cone liked formed feature with its top cut of near the stump. Is it a granit block? Or some old vulcanic basalt plume? It does somewhat stand out among the low lying mangroove surroundings. If its some sort of sediment block like limestone or the such, are there any caves? --T.woelk 09:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geology
Talk:Barely Breathing

message: This was such a big hit for the 90s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6001:EB50:A900:B587:5F34:E3EC:A039 (talk) 03:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add more to this page.
Talk:Quercus alba

message: Does anyone have any sources for the age?  One line in the intro claims they live over 600 years, another a couple paragraphs down says over eight hundred, but yet on the "famous trees" page there is a documented white oak that lived to be about 450 and it is written as though that is one of the oldest documented trees, which makes the 600 and 800 claims seem questionable. 216.158.51.82 (talk) 20:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

message: What's the evidence for a tree of 144'? According to https://www.americanforests.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/BT-Register-PDF_FINAL_web.pdf, the champion tree is 110' tall. I plan to edit this if I hear no objections. Beowulf (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tallest tree 

message: A mention of the famous White Oak from The Shawshank Redemption (that recently fell in a storm) would seem appropriate for this page. 92.24.52.135 (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is already a paragraph devoted to the Shawshank oak within the "Culture" section. Woodlot (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shawshank
Talk:County Route 537 (New Jersey)

message: This article's Good Article Nomination was failed because this article is very deficient in multiple areas. In particular:
*The Lead does not adequately summarize the article.
*The History section is virtually non-existent. The section has two sentences and does not even address the subject of the article.
It is imperative that these sections be developed before this article can have a positive reception in the Good Article Nomination process. This article is only about half developed; the Route description and Major intersections sections are actually quite good. From looking at the article history, the nominator did very little work on the article before nominating it. While it is not forbidden to nominate articles worked on by other editors, it is usually not a good idea because the editors who do the most substantive work on the article are in the best position to figure out whether the article is complete enough to pass the Good Article Review process. It is considered good etiquette to contact the person or persons who did the most substantive work on the article for approval before you nominate the article in a review process. Going forward, please do not nominate articles unless you have done a substantial amount of work on them and they follow the Good Article criteria.  VC  00:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article review
Talk:Firefly Studios

message: So... Dunegon Hero and Stronghold 3 both have articles despite the fact that nobody outside firefly has ever played them... Yet Stronghold Kingdoms, a released game with thousands of active players, is deemed unworthy..... Hmm.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.206.67.34 (talk) 18:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have made a number of copy-edits to this article as it was listed on the community portal. I did retain all of the original content, but also added some more info about the successes of the studio, as I felt there was a lot of focus on negative reviews for the Stronghold series. I felt that this offered a bit more balance to the article overall. I think the 'copy-edit' needed tag could now be deleted but would welcome a second opinion from other Wikipedia editors. Thanks Mattbenjamin2021 15:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done some additional copyediting (hopefully without steamrolling yours) and removed some of the unnecessary negative words. I think with a bit more work the tag can be removed, but maybe I'm being a stickler. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 16:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've given it a look and did some more edits, and it looks like the copyediting work is complete now. I've removed the tag. --Slon02 (talk) 17:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit listing July 2021
Talk:Ranger 1

message: Could someone check the exact launch time? The box says 19:12 UTC, 1961 in spaceflight has 10:04 GMT while http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=1961-021A has 10:04. --Proofreader 19:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. Sorry it took 4 1/2 years to get it fixed! --Funandtrvl (talk) 01:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch time
Talk:Bimini twist

message: Over half of this article is taken verbatim from the page in the external links section. -- Ben (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Added a little bit of info.  I tie good biminis!  :-)  Codman 23:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info 

message: I added a request for citation regarding the weakening the line strength. If the statement is correct, it would be good to be sure, although I can't see how it can be the case - while the loop &/or knot might be stronger than the line, the point at which the standing part of the line enters the knot is still a single line & is compressed by the knot - to my mind, this will inevitably weaken the line & is likely to be the weakest point in many knots. 80.229.172.13 (talk) 04:10, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line strength
Talk:Mamberamo River

message: If measured from the source of longest tributary, Taritatu, probably the longest river on an island in the world with a lenght of over 700 km.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.46.112 (talk) 08:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—174.61.1.44 (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct (for both the source and the mouth). If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 17:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:The Tick (comic book)

message: Where are the documentations of the other Tick comic series?  I know there's one called "Luney Bin," one called "Big Blue Destiny," and one called "Karma Tornado."
I cannot find anything on anything other than the first twelve comics (was th 13th cancelled?) online.
:I am going to add the other series as I can.  There are several.  The 13th issue never came out despite repeated promises from Ben Edlund.  Eventually an issue, dubbed #13 psuedo edition was released by New England Comics, but it is not the official issue 13, although at this point, it might as well be considered official.Ballabosh 04:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ebenezer Cobb Morley

message: Could the image be moved to Commons? It looks older enough to be in public domain. Regards, Ffahm (Talk) 15:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whilst this article is protected and I can't change it, just leaving a note to say that https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/12019526/Mansion-that-belonged-to-singer-Duffy-and-former-Phones-4U-boss-collapses.html is a better source for the house collapsing (more details) and that the plaque was actually on the side of it.  The current two sources do not mention the plaque at all, so not sure where they came from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.35.40.177 (talk) 10:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks IP, I have replaced one of the sources with the one you provided. NZFC(talk)(cont) 19:15, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: "House Collapses" source

message: An photograph of Morley riding on horseback was published in  without credit to the photographer or any copyright / ownership information.  Unfortunately, UK copyright law would seem to require that it must have been published more than 70 years ago to be in the public domain, and I can't find evidence of such publication. Grover cleveland (talk) 18:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph of Morley riding on horseback
Talk:Spider: The Video Game

message: Is this game actually called "Spider: The Video Game" or is it simply called "Spider"? If the latter, it should be moved. --Jayunderscorezero 18:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bill Harsey Jr.

message: Please read WP:BIO to see if this person should be in Wikipedia. Aboutmovies 09:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Harsey is definitely notable, some people know nothing outside their own comfort zones.  I will help work on this article as well.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 16:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Smoking pipe

message: I propose the line about Herodotus observing the inhalation of smoke for intoxication be deleted due to irrelevance, seeing as there is no mention of pipes at all. I seem to remember some similar observation of the Huns burning branches and becoming 'drunk as if from wine', although this too would be irrelevant. Anyone agree?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Storleone (talk • contribs) 03:19, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Herodotus

message: Given this article focuses on smoking pipes, rather than pipes themselves, it should mention that pipe smoking can cause mouth, lip, tongue, throat, larynx, and lung cancer.  It can also increase that likelihood of cancer of the pancreas, kidney, bladder, colon, and cervix as well as leukemia and diseases such as chronic obstructive lung disease, stroke, and coronary heart disease.  The risks of pipe smoking are distinct from those incurred by other forms of tobacco usage. --RandomHumanoid(⇒) 08:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is a general overview of pipes and related history and culture, not about tobacco.  Your proposed additions really belong in Health_effects_of_tobacco.  Frotz (talk) 10:40, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Each method of using tobacco has its own unique risks.  This article may have once been intended about pipes as objects, but it is clearly now equally concerned with the act smoking with a pipe.  Thus, it doesn't seem unreasonable to mention pipe-specific health risks here specifically. --RandomHumanoid(⇒) 17:28, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  When this subject was discussed for Smoking pipe (tobacco), the consensus was to put the proposed additions in Health_effects_of_tobacco.  I doubt you'll get much traction if you bring it up again.  Frotz (talk) 02:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health concerns 

message: I've changed this page to a disambiguation page. The previous contents have been moved (unaltered except the opening paragraph) to Pipe smoking which is a much more accurate title.Obscurasky (talk) 10:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed this page to a disambiguation page 

message: Is it possible that pipes were invented as a way of keeping a fire burning from one camp site to the next?
Just granpa (talk) 12:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  keeping the fire burning 

message: Removed meerschaum from the list of "Other kinds of smoking pipes". Really, that's stupid. Also, wood is not a kind of table, pipe, or spoon. --213.184.43.2 (talk) 17:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  An object's material is not a kind of that object
Talk:Palatinate (region)

message: Add "# Support" or "# Oppose" on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
# strong support according to Discussion Symposiarch --Symposiarch 08:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 

message: # strong support according to Discussion Symposiarch --Symposiarch 08:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: I'm not sure if this image could be useful in this article or not, but it is free and seems to be of the subject of the article. ~ BigrTex 21:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image for article 

message: The borders on the maps are wrong. You can't take modern Districts' artificial borders as borders for the traditional region of Palatinate. So for example some villages in the Kreuznach district, as Becherbach, clearly belong to northern Palatinate. In the time when Bavaria was Palatinian (OK, some people think it was the other way around) for a long time the river Glan was a border between Palatinate and Prussia. Becherbach is almost ten kilometres south of the Glan. And even Meisenheim, a town on the other side of the Glan, was Palatinian in earlier times and can therefore be called palatinian, too: Till 1477 Meisenheim was the recidence town of the duchy of Pfalz-Zweibrücken. And if you take the dialect borders, you can find Palatinian dialect north of the Glan, too.
Greetings, --RAVEN FROM PITCH MAKER'S CREEK (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borders 

message: The article twice referred to "Count palatines."  I believe the plural should be "Counts palatine."  (The article on Count palatine seems to agree with that view.)  So I changed both instances.  I hope nobody objects.  140.147.236.195 (talk) 19:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Count palatine--plural 

message: After reading this page, I still feel like I have little idea where or what the Palatinate is, or what cities it encompasses. It would be nice to see a clear picture of the borders on a map of Germany that shows the cities of modern Germany, rather than a map that is a formless blob with no features shown. Also saying that it encompasses the former land of whatever to the north, and some little known mountain range to the south, etc. doesn't really help most readers know where this place is. A clear picture of the region on a modern map with some landmarks and cities shown would be much clearer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.215.80.96 (talk) 02:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is confusing 

message: Hey, I'm not sure what the average annual temperature is, but I'm pretty sure it's not 10 million degrees.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:1:817:0:0:0:5A (talk) 03:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate
Talk:Minquiers and Ecréhous

message: This article needs a map --AW 19:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should these be listed as a piece of disputed territory? --MacRusgail 20:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not disputed between different states. The French state makes no claim to the territories; the existence of revanchist opinion in some groups in France doesn't make them disputed in that sense, I'd have thought. Man vyi 10:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed territories?

message: I wonder whether the time has come to split into Minquiers and Écréhous. Comments? Man vyi 10:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now split. Man vyi 07:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting the article

message: One of these territories is 6 miles North-East of Jersey (49° 13′ 0″ N 2° 7′ 57″ W); the other is 9 miles South. One coordinate (48°58′16″N, 2°04′01″W) can't cover both, surely? Man vyi 07:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Aylahs

message: :For the record, I wish to state that:
:#I did not create or use multiple accounts in either of the AfD processes.
:#Any deletions or reversions that I have made are justified with an edit summary, a note on the talk page where appropriate, and in cases of vandalism a notice on the user's or IP's talk page.
:#User:Trueblood786 has also requested that I be investigated at the RFI page. The investigating admin there stated that he "didn't see any indications of vandalism".
:#User:Trueblood786 also launched a complaint against me at the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
:#In the past multiple users (including myself) have noted that User:Trueblood786 appears to routinely use anonymous IP addresses as sockpuppets in commiting vandalism, and other questionable edits. Please see the following talk pages for more details:
:#* - vandalism and abusive edits
:#* - vandalism and link spam
:#* - vandalism of AfD pages
:If I can be of assistance to the investigating administratorcheckuser, please feel free to address me at my talk page. Regards -- Aylahs (talk) 04:17, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Response from [[User:Aylahs|Aylahs]]
Talk:Les Dirouilles

message: This article needs a map --AW 19:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has a map.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the requested map template since the article now has a map. Transpoman (talk) 00:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ABC Stage 67

message: I've rated this article as a stub because of its low information content and low importance because of its low viewing figures.--Opark 77 21:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I beg to differ on "low importance". Any series that premiers original musicals by Stephen Sondheim, Burt Bacharach, and Jerry Bock  is important, despite the low viewership at the time. The article still might be only worth a "stub" rating, but the fact that it wasn't commercially successful is overshadowed by the numerous historically significant episodes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.86.248.1 (talk) 14:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  For such a short run, it showcased a number of talents in a variety of fields and won several awards.  I'm changing the rating. JimVC3 (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment rating

message: Thanks for uploading or contributing to :Image:Stage67.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 23:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:Stage67.jpg]]

message: I've added an infobox, but filling in information is difficult.  The crew (director, producer, writer, etc.) changed for every episode.  I filled in the little that was consistent for the series.  JimVC3 (talk) 00:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Infobox
Talk:Society of Saint Pius V

message: Is Fr Cekada speaking as a spokesperson of the SPV?  If so, it could be stated.  if not, why is it here? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 18:52, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are we interested in the psychology of the splits? 

message: the first line says "sedevacantist" but 2 sentences later says that the question of sedevacantism is "unresolved"--142.163.195.197 (talk) 01:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The SSPV has stated that it lacks the authority to rule on sedevacantism, but considers it a valid theological opinion. Many of its clergy adhere to sedevacantism. Count Cherokee (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  sedevacantist?
Talk:James Watson (American soldier)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: James Watson (soldier) →  – Insufficient disambiguation, given that James Watson (British Army officer) was also a soldier. BD2412 T 23:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 December 2021
Talk:Roberto Arlt

message: The Spanish Wikipedia says that "Roberto Arlt murió ... de un paro cardíaco", with an apparently valid citation: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberto_Arlt#cite_note-AnuarioAmericanistaEuropeo-10. Paro cardíaco is a heart attack, whereas the English page says that he died of a stroke. Unless there is a citation to support the claim that he died of a stroke, the cause of death should be corrected to match the Spanish page. Pololanguage (talk) 02:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Lake Matano

message: What's a manger lake? --AW 18:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just going to take it out. --AW 16:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by MethanoJen (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biogeochemical Cycles