lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spectrum News 1 North Carolina

message: This article was nominated for deletion on June 1, 2005, and the consensus was to keep. For discussion, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/News 14 Carolina. sjorford →•← 13:15, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Logo used on the article is outdated. It incorrectly uses the 2016 logo, which was phased out in 2017 when SN rebranded and went flat. It also fails to reflect the modern branding "Spectrum News 1," as the 2016 logo does not include the "1" in the logo, since it wasn't part of the branding. We should replace the logo with the following image, which is the official logo, seen on the SN1 NC website:
Jkrosado (talk) 14:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Add new logo

message: Why isn't there anything about the TWW incident on here? It was notable and covered in numerous online, print, and tv media at the time, and lots of stuff still exists online... – ɜɿøɾɪɹℲ ( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs ) 21:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the history. I got *to* this article from the TWW article, which claimed there should be more here. Maybe it got whitewashed by a corporate editor? Zaphraud (talk) 02:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a surprise really, not one of there best moments; but it did teach them a lesson about letting anyone call in for closings.  We should probably check the page from time to time make sure someone from TWC doesn't erase it again.  --WashuOtaku (talk) 03:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-added the content from a previous revision as it's referred to in the TWW article for more information. --Sauzer (talk) 00:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-added the content again. One self-important clownboat may consider it "irrelevant" and "minor", but TWC still considers it significant and wanted to find some way to press charges against TWW users over the stunt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acidqueen5426 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  TWW pranking
Talk:Stella (American TV series)

message: This article was nominated for deletion on June 2 2005, and the consensus was to keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Stella (television show) for discussion. sjorford →•← 14:05, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: This show was definitely not on in 2003... it was on during the summer of 2005. On an unrelated note, i still miss it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.211.61.212 (talk) 02:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of show's airing 
Talk:Guadiana

message: How can the river be 342 miles wide?  Does it mean the basin?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.92.184 (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is still there, i guess it means meters, someone correct it with the right value or it should be deleted. --Iagocasabiell (talk) 15:50, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem! 

message: This sentence is not clear: "The Guadiana covers a length of 76 kilometres, 818 kilometres of travel distance, of which 578 kilometres are within Spanish territory, 140 kilometres within Portugal, while 100 kilometres are shared between the two nations; ..."
In addition, the following statement is not correct: "The river's basin extends from the eastern portion of Extremadura to the southern provinces of the Algarve;..." The Guadiana basin also stretches east to Castilla - La Mancha. In fact the river's source(s) is (are) located in that region.
--200.12.130.224 (talk) 17:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 
Talk:Listed buildings in Birmingham

message: This should be a catgeory (or series of categories, one for each grade) not an article, surely? Andy Mabbett 14:12, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There certainly could be categories, but I think the list is needed as well because there are buildings on it which may never get their own article.  -- Kjlewis 16:11, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have merged these two onto one line as they seem to me to be contextually linked.They are both II*. My apologies if you were wanting the table to have one line per listing. If so I will try to separate them again. I have started an article on the school. Oosoom 07:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No that seems logical. I've already included a couple of other separately listed structures on the same site as a single line (e.g Aston Hall plus lodge & stables) where the grade is identical. Valiantis 12:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icknield Street School & 303 Icknield Street (Headmaster's house) 

message: *98 Edmund Street - Victorian Architecture in Britain - Blue Guide, Julian Orbach, 1987, , p428  Oosoom 22:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: This was granted Grade II listed status last year  and is located on Navigation Street, city centre. I dont know the architect as I have searched the net quite a lot and no names have been given but it was built in 1964. - Erebus555 12:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Street Signal Box 
Talk:Russian Trotter

message: In June 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was to keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Russian Trotter for a record of the discussion. — Trilobite (Talk) 14:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: 
Discussion at Talk:Sardinian (horse).
User:Mike Rosoft
:Relevant version has been deleted as copyvio. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for mentioning that,  - I'd forgotten to place the customary notice on this page (now below). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I presume it's resolved. It's been just past a decade. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060513004754/http://www.equinekingdom.com/breeds/light_horses/russian_trotter.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Victoria Square, Adelaide

message: Could we add this photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephenliveshere/4893364665/ to the webpage because it is on Flickr? Would like to add a picture of the Torrens building to the Heinz College page Mar2194 (talk) 17:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  That one doesn't have the right licence - it's only CC BY-NC-ND 2.0. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:15, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request

message: I think there's a case for merging the Tarndanyangga article with this one, and including more information about the word origin, history and significance in this article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Talk:Petrov classification

message: Made a start in describing one classification of the Weyl tensor (based on pnd's). May need to mention who Petrov was and describe other classifications briefly. Oh, and need to define a pnd ! ---Mpatel 14:30, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Version

message: Hi Chris.
I've just tagged on a sentence mentioning the electromagnetic peeling theorem, on which there should be an article as there are nice comparisons with the gravitational case. Which brings me onto another topic - given the many similarities between gravitation and electromagnetism (mathematical and physical), perhaps there should be an article devoted to this. Not quite sure what to call it, as there are many differences between the two as well. Maybe, Comparisons between gravitation and electromagnetism (yuck !), or Similarities between GR and EM (still yuck). Hmmm... . Anyway, I think you see my point. 
MP   (talk) 10:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peeling theorems and new article  

message: I extensively edited an earlier version of this article and had been monitoring it for bad edits, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.
Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive.  I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions, although I hope for the best.
Good luck to User:Mpatel and to all students searching for information, regardless!---CH 02:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Students beware

message: The current introduction claims that (emphasis by me):
: The classification was found in 1954 by A. Z. Petrov and independently by Felix Pirani in 1957.
I don't feel comfortable editing this, but I find this claim false, judging by , where Pirani references the work of Petrov already in 1956 (meaning that he couldn't independently discover the classification in 1957). Trosos (talk) 13:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pirani and independence
Talk:Nieman Foundation for Journalism

message: The Untold Story of Agnes Wahl Nieman and the Creation of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard. A free book on iTunes is also available about her life. Any interest to create this article? Shushugah (talk) 23:38, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Create article or section about Agnes Wahl Nieman
Talk:Chicago house

message: where's all the info for chicago house after the mid eighties? it's like stopping and article on rock and roll at 1972!! can someone fill us in please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Btxtsf (talk • contribs) 03:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete? 

message: is it me or does this article only describe and talk about house music in general rather than the chicago house style? --MilkMiruku 04:17, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty much all popular music (not just electronic) is 4/4, but for some reason everyone uses that phrase when they actually mean Four on the Floor, as you said. --Andylindsay (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition 

message: How is this relevent to the Article?  I see where the writer is going, however I do not understand how this section is important to the topic. --Mickey 12:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WBMX Radio and the Hot Mix 5??? 

message: The Mr. lee paragraph was deleted. Mr. Lee did some decent songs and is a great producer, but if there is no Steve Hurley, Farley Keith nor Ron Hardy sections, a Mr. Lee section is not even on the radar. So far the article at least presents the basics for the genre in Chicago. DJ Black Adam (talk) 12:44, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted the Mr. Lee section 

message: I have removed a reference to Hip Hop being a "stylistic origin" of Chicago house as no early house producer has stated this and hip hop was still so new when house was forming.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.77.189 (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hip Hop 

message: I added dub as an influence. Most if not all original house productions featured dub b-sides and were often heavily drenched in dub effects and samples commonly featured in dub and reggae.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.194.67 (talk) 23:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This article must be based on a summary of published sources, not the assertions of individual editors. If anyone here makes assertions about the topic, they must be verifiable, found in published sources. So let's start talking about sources. Binksternet (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence of Dub 

message: I have corrected a recent edit here which claimed that the term "Chicago house" was coined to differentiate between the house music produced in that city and the "garage house" produced in New York. That is not so as any brief glance around the web will tell you. Garage house was originally called garage music (and still is by myself and my peers) and "house" and "garage", which developed separately but within the same time period, were regarded as being distinct dance music styles in their early years. The term 'Chicago house' was coined to refer to the earliest house music productions, which originated in Chicago.
(Solidsandie (talk) 18:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garage and House
Talk:Thank You Girl

message: This article has been kept following this VFD-debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:56, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The paragraph about the composition of this song makes several claims that I take issue with, at least until persuasive evidence is presented. First of all, I've never heard any story - nor is any reference provided - that different parts of this song were composed by the individual writers. Second, it refers to the verses being written by one (which one?) and the chorus by the other (which one?), but what about the bridge? If anything, there's a different "feel" between the verse/chorus and the bridge, but that doesn't persuade me. Third, the notion that the distinction between the two writing styles is evident is decidedly NPOV. I'm going to give this a couple of weeks, and if no one else addresses this or persuades me I'm wrong (which anyone is more than welcome to do), I'm going to delete or radically alter that section. MicroProf 21:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate sections by Lennon and McCartney 

message: I recall "per" meaning "through, along or over" from my Latin days. Anyway, the expression "Personnel per" on this page and on the "From Me To You" page, does not sit right with me. It intrudes into the Personnel section, it's pretentious and possibly just wrong. I suggest replacing it with "(source: xxx)" plus the numbered link to reference. If someone agrees, please change it (I won't based on my opinion alone, because I'm an idiot, but two idiots could be quorate). Love, Fido x  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.62.29 (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection to "Personnel per"
Talk:Earl of Plymouth

message: How is "other", as a name, pronounced? Andy Mabbett 14:59, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would guess it's like "oath".  —Tamfang 18:43, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

text: According to the article (now), it appears to rhyme with bother. —Tamfang (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Other as a name

message: Please let me understand why we have "Barons Windsor (1529)" as a header twice. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Gerda Arendt Because that family became "Earls of Plymouth" twice, being Baron Windsor as their most senior title, both before the second creation (the first for that family), and in the interregnum. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barons 

message: The death of Other, 3rd Earl of Plymouth, was announced today in a local newspaper, the Shropshire Star as having taken place on 7th March 2018. I have updated the succession account accordingly.Cloptonson (talk) 21:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:Adelaide Plains

message: Might be useful if we can include the area for the Adelaide Plains region. 58.174.209.229 (talk) 02:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Added information about the area of the Adelaide Plains Council area which is roughly the central third of the Adelaide Plains. Donama (talk) 04:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area statistics m
Talk:Mashup

message: But it is and always will be Mashups or Mash-Ups. Problem is that Hybrid Web 2.0 APIs are now using the term Mashups. But that's a recent thing.
Bastard Pop is a correct way to describe Music Hybrids, but Mashups is more relevant.
What to do eh?
I vote for the Mashups Disambiguation page to refer to "Mashup (web application hybrid)" and "Mashup (Music Hybrid)".
Bastard pop will disappear faster than it was coined as a term. Listen to any radio station or serach the web - Mashups is always used and you NEVER hear the term Bastard Pop.
My 2c —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.214.6.229 (talk • contribs) 
:My 50 Cent :-) is that this is an encyclopedia, not a blog.
:chocolateboy 05:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Once upon a time someone called it Bastard pop 

message: Hello there. I do not have too much experience with Wikipedia. I did my B.A. project on Mashups and I'd like to share it with whoever thinks it might be useful to him. On the website there is a multimedia approach to explain this topic. There are simple explanation in textform, embedded video examples and audio interviews from people like Lawrence Lessig. Furthermore there are selected links to scientific rescources.
The url is www.mashme.infowww.mashme.info. Feel free to use, recycle and link to it. It is under the creative commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
cheers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.48.139.68 (talk) 11:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mashme Project

message: Can we put a direction to mashup minded here?  -Michael.kutch (talk) 21:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mashup minded]]

message: Tag lines for "mash-up (culture)" and "mash-up (music)" are confusingly similar on the current disambig page. Somebody fix this please?  Morganfitzp (talk) 19:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music vs. Culture
Talk:Vol au vent

message: Also, the article still says vol au vent translates as "Flight in the wind" but the Spanish Wikipedia claims it means "flight without motor". Bablefish translate it as "flight with the wind". None of these seem very relevant anyway, so perhaps it should just be removed.
Angela. 06:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The translation is "flight of the wind". For one thing, it's french, not spanish. For another, "au" has no direct translation in English as its meaning varies with context, so Babelfish can't reliably translate that preposition. But in this case it means 'of'. CGameProgrammer 00:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: French translation

message: This article and the article for canapé are both very small and closely related so I've decided to merge the two. If anyone strong disagrees it should be pretty easy to revert. Vicarious 05:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Disodium guanylate

message: See the following....
* http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+compendial+substances&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
* http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+compendial+drug&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
* http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=10&hl=en&q=allintitle%3A%20compendial%20food%20additive&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws
--222.67.212.209 (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the sign generated by the template of ''Expand-section'' necessary for the ...food additives....??? 

message: * http://www.zsda.gov.cn/uploads/soft/100107/4-10010G61912.pdf
* http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=en&safe=strict&q=5-%E9%B8%9F%E8%8B%B7%E9%85%B8%E4%BA%8C%E9%92%A0+Disodium+5%E2%80%B2-Guanylate+gov.cn&btnG=Search&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
--222.64.215.115 (talk) 08:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Chinese translations of the chemical....are based on the following...... 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?q=5-%E9%B8%9F%E8%8B%B7%E9%85%B8%E4%BA%8C%E9%92%A0+GB+10796-1989&hl=zh-CN&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=
* http://www.zsda.gov.cn/uploads/soft/100107/4-10010G61912.pdf
--222.64.215.115 (talk) 08:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compendial status..... 

message: I removed this entire section as it was based on a website in the Netherlands which did not substantiate any of the many dubious claims.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaxelrod (talk • contribs) 17:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nutritional Information
Talk:Media circus

message: Here's the earliest I could find, from 1972: https://www.newspapers.com/image/81347237/?terms=%22media%20circus%22&match=1. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest use of term 

message: is it possible to add the Balloon boy hoax? I remember this was not only a media circus in the USA but a the whole world, at least in my country a few news broadcasters were relaying the live transmisions from the USA about the incident. I thought it would fit the criteria Osw719 (talk) 21:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balloon boy?
Talk:Comparison of browser engines

message: This is in response to the end of an archived thread about the criteria for what should be considered an engine. In principle it's not that hard to define. The browser engine article already does a good job of this, though what's covered there is most applicable to the mainstream engines (which collectively account for over 99% of actual browser usage).
It's a bit trickier for the tiny niche hobbyist projects, like NetSurf and LibWeb. The consensus reached in the archived thread on NetSurf is a good guideline, in that the set of libraries and components that can be called an "engine" could, in theory, be used by another group of hobbyists to make a different browser. This is, after all, at the heart of what a software engine is: a large component that can be reused for a different software project. However, the nature of these types of hobby projects is heavily DIY: the lure of designing and implementing their own new thing is what tends to motivate them. But this doesn't invalidate the design of the software to feasibly be reused by a different project (even if that never actually happens). --Pmffl (talk) 02:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for being an 'engine'
Talk:Sophora

message: Been doing a bit of digging - recent research shows that Sophora is paraphyletic, and has been/is being broken up into several genera. 
The type species is Sophora tomentosa L. from tropical Asia; the Pacific Ocean species (S. tetraptera, S. microphylla, S. toromiro, etc), sometimes treated in the separate section or genus Edwardsia, are fairly closely related to it and can be retained in Sophora.
The North American S. secundiflora, S. arizonica and S. gypsophila are unrelated to these, though close to Styphnolobium, and are now separated into the genus Calia.
North American S. affine is now Styphnolobium affinis.
A useful paper: Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146: 439-446 (2004). The relationship of Sophora sect. Edwardsia (Fabaceae) to Sophora tomentosa, the type species of the genus Sophora, observed from DNA sequence data and morphological characters.
A synonym list at Plant Gene Resources of Canada
I'll be editing the relevant page(s) accordingly over the next day to two - MPF 15:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good stuff, I've been meaning to do something about this for a while (excuse = busy). You can find a lot more references here from my PhD thesis if you search for Sophora too. I don't think that the three paraphyletic clades have formally been renamed, but they definately should be if you look at the trees. Onco p53 18:05, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Paraphyletic

message: The town of Seriqbuya is apparently named for one of the plants in this genus- maybe that would be an appropriate part of a future 'Culture' section? Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Culture