lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Main Street (novel)

message: I will make some some copy-edits, but sheesh, it is like a bad high school essay in parts:
::There is some criticism toward the novel concerning the seemingly lack of direction and endless description.
::Controversy about the small-town portrayal of vicious back-stabbers and hypocrites was also probably a factor in the novel's popularity; in 1920, it was a heralded thought to live in an area like Gopher Prairie--a notion hilariously denounced with Main Street's powerful inculcation.
Caltrop 04:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Remember, Wikipedia is an open source encyclopedia that every ninth grader can edit. Shoehorn 04:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Ideas, But Low Quality 

message: There is a mergefrom tag for Gopher Prairie.  I think we should leave it as is rather than making it a redirect, for clarity.  RJFJR (talk) 00:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No noteworthy content in Gopher prairie, therefore redirected. Inwind (talk) 15:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: mergefrom tag
Talk:Bad Day on the Midway

message: I don't see why almost all sections of this article were removed (characters, side characters, cast, endings, etc.).
Without this content, which is completely cited by the game itself this article is garbage and a stub. As for citation, you may play it yourself, I don't think there's another way to cite the characters and plot parts.
If you have a different opinion on this and want to remove the sections again, please FIRST let's discuss about this and tell me how these sections can be cited. Anything else is vandalizing IMHO. --79.254.2.114 (talk) 23:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated at WP:VGSCOPE, such detail is beyond the scope of Wikipedia. Surely there are other wikis for that content; here, for example. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 23:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  That is unfortunate but I see why. I will then try to transfer this information to another place as you suggested. The special character of this game makes it almost necessary to look up information on characters etc. Thanks for the feedback!! --79.254.2.114 (talk) 23:42, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of content making this a stub 

message: I'm the guy from the discussion above on this Talk page. I eventually decided to rewrite large portions of this page and add some citations, as the state of this article was a pity (and essentially unrepresentative of Wikipedia's quality level). I decided to remove both warning templates, and I hope that's okay. --134.93.11.11 (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-Write of this article
Talk:Banjo-Kazooie: Grunty's Revenge

message: Shouldn';t there at least be a paragraph for the game on mobile? It is in the mobile phone category
:I honestly can barely find any proof of the mobile version's supposed existence. I can see the article has barely been updated since this Mobile question was asked in 2006 lol. Spilia4 (talk) 04:31, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  For Mobile? 

message: Re  , I think you're thinking of Grunty's Revenge Missions, which is just a compilation of the minigames. There was also a full mobile port of the main Grunty's Revenge game. JOEBRO64 20:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I found this gameplay footage (which reads "Grunty's Revenge: MOBILE") and it looks much like it has the same overall gameplay mechanics like the GBA game, but looks like it uses a vastly different engine and looks extremely different too. Lordtobi (✉) 21:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I still don't think those are substantial enough to have them listed as developers in the infobox though. The graphics, presentation, and gameplay may be scaled down a bit, but it's still the same basic game; same gameplay, levels, characters, and plot. For precedence, FA Batman: Arkham Asylum doesn't credit Virtuos (who developed the 8th gen remaster) in the infobox, even though their version uses a different engine. JOEBRO64 00:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the difference is that Virtuos took an existing, finished game and changed a couple lines of code (port) as well as cleaned up some textures (remaster), while In-Fusio took the same creative direction and characters but built an entirely new game around it, including own art direction, own engine programming, own audio development etc. Gameplay and plot is thr only thing they did not make themselves. Lordtobi (✉) 05:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Port developer 

message: Words such as "installment" and "favorably" were spelled incorrectly, and one other user believes otherwise. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:20, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , the article is written in British English. Per WP:RETAIN, we retain the existing variety, not squabble about one or the other. JOEBRO64 02:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: On what grounds? DawgDeputy (talk) 02:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: On the grounds that it's the established variety and has been for years now? JOEBRO64 02:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling errors...
Talk:201 series

message: The 201 Series Page Needs To Be Improved. On Japanese Version Of This Article. 1 Rail Car (KuHa 201-1) Is The Only One Railcar Preserved Of This Series. I Hope That More Useful Information Will Be Added, and I Will Try To Help Making This Article Better 😊 PolishDenshaFanatic (talk) 22:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Expansion Of The 201 Series Page.
Talk:Stark (novel)

message: Just working on the Info box, but I could do with some help since I can't find my copy of Stark.
Red Fiona 23:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Infobox now included in the article. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, everyone. I've basically rewritten this article, and made it more than six times longer. Please look it over and change anything you don't like. I am having great trouble finding online sources (perhaps partly because it was published in 1989), so the article is light on references. - Richard Cavell (talk) 12:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edit, November 2008 
Talk:700 Series Shinkansen

message: I couldn't find any sources that mention J-TREC or Fuji HI / Subaru as manufacturers. To the editor on multiple IPs that insists on adding these companies without sources, please engage in this discussion and tell us where you get your information from. Regards, Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Manufacturers
Talk:E1 Series Shinkansen

message: Is there a set in preservation?118.92.241.244 (talk) 02:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Preservation
Talk:E231 series

message: I saw a JR placard inside a Chūō local line car which mentioned that the current cars in use are eco-friendly, and require just 47% of the power of the old 103s.  Unfortunately, I didn't get a picture of it; but, it seems like a fact worth noting in the article, provided there is a source which is more reliable than my memory.  One more day of visiting Tokyo, and I'll see if I can spot the same sign again.  Neier 09:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power requirements 

message: Isn't this article's title a little bit too ambigous? I suggest we move its contents to "JR East E231 Train Series", in accordance to the Japanese　「JR東E231系電車」, and turn the present page into a redirect. -- Ishikawa Minoru 20:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "XXX series" is the format currently used for JR/JNR EMUs on Wikipedia. I see no need to adopt the extremely cumbersome format used on Ja Wiki. Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Japanese_rolling_stock for others. DAJF 00:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change 

message: There got say 
year construction: 1998-2011
however is this true
and if its not
can you show me a reference SBS2803M (talk) 12:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  In old revisions of the article 
Talk:E3 Series Shinkansen

message: Doesn't the smaller loading gauge mean there's a sizable gap between the trains and the platforms when they're used on the "regular" Shinkansen lines? 108.246.205.134 (talk) 07:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right. I have added a sentence and image to explain about the doorway steps that extend to bridge this gap. --DAJF (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smaller loading gauge question 
Talk:E4 Series Shinkansen

message: Two eight-car sets can be coupled together for extra capacity: a sixteen-car E4 series formation trainset carries a total of 1,634 seated passengers - the highest-capacity high-speed rail trainset in the world.[1]
26 units were built between 1997 and 2003. As with the earlier E1 series trains, maximum speed is 240 km/h.''
If they are onlu capable of 240km/h then they ARE NOT true High Speed Trains ... if trains under 250km/h are considered high speed then there are other trains with greater capacity.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.132.10.158 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Highest capacity?

message: Can anyone tell me why the E4 series Shinkansen replaces 200 series and the E1 series?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 23:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  200 series and E1 series replacement reasons?
Talk:Baten Kaitos Origins

message: * http://www.rpgfan.com/reviews/batenkaitosorigins/index.html - Detailed review, good overview of game. Sergecross73 msg me 16:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for future cleanup 

message: # http://cube.gamespy.com/gamecube/baten-kaitos-2/692369p1.html
# http://cube.gamespy.com/gamecube/baten-kaitos-2/692369p2.html
# https://www.gamesradar.com/baten-kaitos-origins-review/
# https://www.gamezone.com/reviews/baten_kaitos_origins_gc_review/
# https://www.nintendoworldreport.com/review/11260/baten-kaitos-origins-gamecube
# https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/baten-kaitos-origins-review/1900-6159628/
# https://uk.pcmag.com/electronics/24911/baten-kaitos-origins (???)
# http://www.honestgamers.com/19960/gamecube/baten-kaitos-origins/game.html
Sergecross73 msg me 02:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Wave 2

message: # https://www.nintendojo.com/features/columns/cerebral-gamer/cerebral-gamer-the-main-character Sergecross73 msg me 23:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: * http://www.cubed3.com/news/5654/1/c3-exclusive-interview-monolith-soft-on-nintendo-wii-support-baten-kaitos-ii-and-more.html 
* https://www.siliconera.com/baten-kaitos-3-was-canceled-but-monolith-soft-art-director-wants-it-back-for-a-new-development/
* https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-09-06-monster-hunter-tri-g-rumoured-for-3ds
* https://www.nintendoworldreport.com/news/staff?start=7000&sort=date&year=0#/rumor/27733/new-3ds-titles-to-be-announced-next-week
Sergecross73 msg me 16:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Wave 3
Talk:Batman Begins (video game)

message: 82.55.222.10 (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dis is the Coolest Game EVA. 
Talk:Agatsuma Line

message: Argh. Can't seem to be able to add a category without simultaneously deleting another one. RNavigator (talk) 20:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

message: Isn't Agatsuma line starting in Takasaki, and should include Stations prior to Shibukawa?
http://www.jreast.co.jp/e/stations/e934.html Shows platforms for Agatsuma Line in Takasaki Station Seanpbarry (talk) 23:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As explained in the opening paragraph, the official start of the line is at Shibukawa, although all trains start and terminate at Takasaki. --DAJF (talk) 00:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Starting station
Talk:Aonami Line

message: I have heard in passing that the Aonami line is in the red because of very few riders. Can anyone confirm this? If it's true, should it be included? --Timepilot 00:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Details have been added. --DAJF (talk) 00:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridership and finances?
Talk:Batsugun

message: So this game is set underwater rather than outerspace? Any reason for this? 2fort5r (talk) 01:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added the specific date of the Sega Saturn release, along with a citation. Also added a bit more detail to the info-box. Ducksandwich (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor tweaks
Talk:Battle Gear 3

message: the timeline deserves a standalone Side by Side series article with Battle Gear series redirecting to it. Paris By Night 12:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: timeline
Talk:Battlecruiser 3000AD

message: The links from the Battlecruiser 3000AD area all dead, so I am removing the link.  Hopefully someone will host the game in the future. --Dr.Worm 03:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that dksmart's edit does add something to the article: it specifically mentions the link between Battlecruiser 3000AD and Universal Combat. It's apparently the same gaming universe; isn't it important to mention that? Cardinal2 23:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection between BC3K and UC 

message: *https://web.archive.org/web/20041211182546/http://archive.gamespy.com/articles/june03/dumbestmoments/readers/index2.shtml
*
*
*https://archive.org/stream/boot-magazine-issue06-mmx-feb-1997/Boot%20Magazine%20-%20Issue%20006%20-%20MMX%20-%20February%201997#page/n27/mode/2up
*https://archive.org/stream/boot-magazine-issue07-the-in-crowd-mar-1997/Boot%20Magazine%20-%20Issue%20007%20-%20The%20In%20Crowd%20-%20March%201997#page/n27/mode/2up
*https://archive.org/stream/NEXT_Generation_40#page/n47/mode/2up/
*https://web.archive.org/web/19961018182535fw_/http://www.nuke.com:80/cgr/news/1995/july16.htm
*https://web.archive.org/web/20040229001532/http://www.gamespy.com/gamespin/march01/gamespin2/
JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:National Lampoon's Doon

message: Why is this mentioned in the "See Also" section. Apart from also being a parody, the two works are completely unrelated. They're not both parodying of the same thing. It wouls seem to make more sense to not list it at all or to list all parodies ever written... 195.153.45.54 11:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were both published in connection with the Harvard Lampoon... AnonMoos 13:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  They are also examples of the same style of humor, namely the sort that is typified by the punning references, somewhat-dated pop-culture references, and mocking style typical not only of Bored of the Rings but also lampoons in MAD magazine and could arguably be considered part of a seminal genre of lampoon that not only made movies such as Airplane! possible, but even necessary. --Samuel John Klein (talk) 19:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bored of the rings?
Talk:Battletoads in Battlemaniacs

message: Why there isnt a criticism section? The game is almost identical to the original. OOps, I forgot, this is Wikipedia, you dont you don’t criticize SNES beat-up games, right?
:If you can find notable sources for criticism (like an old Nintendo Power issue), then feel free to add some.UncannyGarlic (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the man listed as composer, Matt Furniss, only did the in many ways inferior soundtrack of the Sega Mega Drive version of the game. The original SNES soundtrack was most likely composed by the in-house sound team of Rareware, most likely David Wise since he was the man behind most memorable 16-bit Rare tunes. I cannot confirm this though since I do not own the game anymore (doubt I could make it to credits anyways) but I think some clarification would be in order.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.142.158.234 (talk) 09:57, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding composer 

message: Please add cite to any fact where you see Geraldshields11 (talk) 23:54, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Cite

message: https://archive.org/stream/snes-nforce-magazine-04/SNESForce_04_Oct_1993#page/n57/mode/2up --TRIGGERWARNING (talk) 11:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  SNES Force 
Talk:Beggar Prince

message: Hi!
Someone has been trying to revert all critical content from the article, as well as the rumor that the game has been manufactured by Tototek. That person always uses different IPs, never editing anything else; it seems he is trying to hide information from public on purpose.
Even the producer of the game says he is fine with the critics in the article; they are neither incorrect nor biased.
So I suggest changing the article back to the version before the revert.108 Stars (talk) 08:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggestion; cite the producer. Lots42 (talk) 18:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert-War
Talk:Rikuu East Line

message: Is there a reason why this article should be called Riku'u East Line rather than Rikuu East Line?  I'm no Japanese language scholar, but I don't see the purpose of the apostrophe here, and I can't see anything in the MOS that recommends this style. --DAJF (talk) 06:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about article name romanization

message: Riku'u East Line → Rikuu East Line — Nothing in the the MOS supports this non-standard romanization style, so no need for an apostrophe here. DAJF (talk) 06:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:War with the Newts

message: Somebody thought it is needed to have a citation about the Andrias scheuchzeri, being mistaken for a fossil of which was once mistaken for a fossilized antediluvian human. Here is a source: http://www.teylersmuseum.nl/site1995/engels/ruimtes/fossiel/homo.html
The fossil is still being exhibited on Teylers Museum in the Netherlands.
Taka 10:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! (Age and location would be useful.) — kwami (talk) 19:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Andrias scheuchzeri

message: I read the sentence "Veteran Kafka translator David Wyllie completed another translation, released by Melville House in 2012." in section translations as an advert. As far as I can see on bookshop webpages, The Echo Library  published a David Wyllies translation in Jan 2010. Therefore, I am suggesting to remove the mention of the publisher. As I am not registered on wikipedia and not familiar with its exact rules, I leave it to a wikipedian to do the correction. 144.82.182.58 (talk) 12:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, but how is mentioning the publisher advertising? If the Wylie translation has been published by two houses, why not mention both? The Interior (Talk) 19:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The paragraph doesn't mention any other publishers. Why not mention both indeed, there could certainly be better referencing about the various translations. C679 19:26, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  unnecessary advertisment
Talk:New Shuttle

message: I have created the article as "Ina Line". But MOS-JA (Railway in Japan) endorses the "Company name + line name" as the article name. 
(I do not like it personally because it is lengthy. but I will make the redirection.)
"New Shuttle" is better known among the general public, and it does not sacrifice the clarity of the subject or make it ambiguous. It would be accepted as the name of this particular AGT system. 
Therefore I moved it to "New Shuttle". Soredewa 11:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About the title

message: There is now a fourth 2020 series set, no. 24. I got a photo of it last week but it's not good enough to use here. Can anyone get a better one so we can add it to the article? My photo is here for proof: https://mkttransportphoto.smugmug.com/2019/May-2019/Overseas-May-2019/i-Z4vswSt - thanks. Tom walker (talk) 14:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit 24
Talk:The Contrabandista/The Chieftain

message: I've set up the initial work, and will return later to it Adam Cuerden 10:43, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good start. I've restructured the section order a bit, and added some more information in the intro. Marc Shepherd 16:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added in the list of characters. Have seperated out all of Chieftain's minor roles. I don't think anyone below that line is of any particular importance: Juanita has a dance with Grigg in the Act I finale, but I can't think of anyone else that does anything of importance. I'm sure it'll come up when we hit the synopsis if I missed anything. Adam Cuerden 17:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The combined page for two distinct operas wasn't really very effective. Except for short comments at the top of the page, two separate works are being described, and there is little common discussion that would justify a common page. Marc Shepherd 18:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate Pages

message: This is both dubious, and as far as I know, entirely speculative. Inez is simply one of the standard names for that type of character. Marc Shepherd 16:16, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes... I wasn't quite sure if it was worth mentioning, but it comes up on Savoynet on occassion. Deleted it. Adam Cuerden 16:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inez and ''The Gondoliers'' 

message: I'm not really happy with this. I mean "He tries to console her, but in the end decides the best option is to throw off his disguise and pretend to be another of the Ladrones' prisoners." hardly conveys the beauty of that scene. Even if it does convey Burnand's ham-fistedness of plot. Sheesh. It's almost as bad as his "A Miller and His Man". Adam Cuerden 18:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I attempted a revision, hopefully satisfactory. Marc Shepherd 18:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Aye, that looks good.  Hate doing synopses. Always either add too much in, or end up with something exceedingly awkward.  Adam Cuerden 19:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Mind ye, it mostly gets around it by completely ignoring the point of awkwardness: The whole Vasquez shepherd disguise and pretending to be a prisoner for reasons that are never really explained. But what're ye supposed to do? Saying exactly what you think of Burnand's writing is POV! Adam Cuerden 19:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All you have to do is find a citable source that has said so, and that shouldn't be difficult, as the clumsiness of Burnand's librettos was recognized pretty much from the start. I don't have my sources now, but will try to find something later. Or perhaps you'll beat me to it. Marc Shepherd 19:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Had I been doing it, I would have made separate articles. The combined article is a bit awkward. Marc Shepherd 02:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis

message: The archived page is Talk:The Contrabandista/The Chieftain/Archive. – Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 14:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Beatrice of Nazareth

message: I would support the merge.  They seem to be duplicate articles -- go ahead and do it.  -- Pastordavid 21:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge 

message: I'm doing a 20-Minute Article Assessment per Moriwen 's request at Wikiproject Women in Green. Assessing on the six Good article criteria I'd say this article could become a GA with a bit more work to pull it into shape, comments below Mujinga (talk) 10:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Women in Green/20-Minute Article Assessment