lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2006-06-07

message: I didn't think much of the Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/2006-06-07#St._Joseph.27s_School submission, but if it gets approved I suggest its wikilocation be "St. Joseph's School (California)" because there's already an article at St. Joseph's School for a school in India. --EarthFurst 04:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Joseph's School 

message: Any objections to deleting the Taleah Rose Paolelli submission on the grounds of notability, nonsense or another reason? --EarthFurst 04:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taleah Rose Paolelli 

message: Should the domain name rdomains.earth registerd to rnetworld admin mark b dyer copyrights rcopyrights submission be moved to http://fr.wikipedia.org/ or just removed ? --EarthFurst 07:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  move domain_name_rdomains[..] submission to french wikipedia?
Talk:Shin Getter Robo

message: I disagree and think that Shin Getter Robo article should NOT be merged with Getter Robo Armageddon, just as Mazinkaiser has its own page about the robot, and about the OVAs it appears in.  Both Shin Getter Robo and the series it appears in have enough material to fill up two seperate articles easily.
I can't see any reason to merge this into Getter Robo Armageddon. Shin Getter was created well before that OAV, and it has a whole array of appearances that have nothing to do with Armageddon. --67.62.109.178 17:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: How is Shin Getter the TRUE Getter Robo?  Is it just named that way because it just sounds better?Mazinkaiser666 13:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "True" Getter Robo? 

message: How many different forms or incarnations, depending on how you look at it, are there of Shin Getter Robo.  I know of the manga/Armageddon incarnation (where each robo is colored based on the head pilot), the one shown in Shin Getter Robo vs Neo Getter Robo and most Super Robot Wars games (same shape, but they have the red, white and yellow motif this time), and the one from the New Getter Robo (the one where the shape of each mech is different, especially Shin Getter 3, who doesn't have a big butt anymore).  Were there any other versions?  Neo Guyver 17:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Goodsex

message: "It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with newspeak. (Discuss)"
:Agree.  This article seems to be little more than an explanation of Orwell's newspeak term.  (Despite being an opponent of the enforcement of "goodsex" in the real world, I do not see the benefit of mentioning Bush's anti-gay marriage movement.) So it might as well merge in with the rest!  - BalthCat 05:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest moving it to List of Newspeak words rather than a direct merger with Newspeak. User:Angr 19:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't deserve its own article, not the way it is currently.  Go ahead and merge it with the List, where it belongs. Kilyle 20:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm...having looked at some of the previous versions...is there already an article that speaks to sexual taboos that would benefit from a note on this word?  I would expect that similar articles already exist, and that there is no need for another one specifically based around this particular taboo. Kilyle 21:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NTK's proposal to merge 

message: This article currently mixes up fact and fiction in a very confusing way. The first paragraph is about goodsex as a term within the fictional universe of 1984. The second paragraph appears to be giving the real-world basis for the concept of goodsex, but it doesn't make it clear whether this basis is discussed in the novel or not. (If not, it appears to be original research.) The third and fourth paragraphs are about sexual morality in the real world of 21st-century America, and are not even remotely NPOV. They're also not relevant to the discussion of the fictional concept of goodsex, since Orwell lived, and the book is set, in 20th century Britain. User:Angr 19:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction cleanup
Talk:For the Punx

message: This article says it's their debut album, from 1997, but the band page lists complilation albums and EPs from as early as 1990. Do compilation albums not count? -- General Wesc 05:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Aaron Davey

message: Can the article metion somewhere that Aaron Davey is God? Adam 05:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aaron Davey 

message: I have categorised this as WP:VIC instead of WP:NT, because although Davey was born in Darwin the notable part of his career is exclusively Victorian. Other opinions welcome, as always.  Euryalus (talk) 09:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Vic instead of NT 
Talk:Dalmatian pelican

message: They are being persecuted?   Hmmm...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.50.57.32 (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wesley College, Sheffield

message: I fully support the changes just made that move all the Wesley College stuff from King Edward VII School (Sheffield) to this page (previously a redirect), leaving the only King Teds stuff on King Edward VII School (Sheffield). Good that someone was bold. --Bduke 23:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sussex, New Brunswick

message: I've heard that there is a significant deposit of natural gas in the Sussex area. Does anyone know enough to make an entry about it? 142.167.65.250 18:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural Gas? 

message: The section here on Princess Louise Park Show Centre is out of control. I trimmed a little of the most inappropriate content, which was far too promotional in tone (a lot of "Come see us!" complete with exclamation points) - but a lot of this content just doesn't belong here. I don't know if it merits its own page, but a page about Sussex does not need more than a paragraph or so about one facility within Sussex. Details about who may rent the barns, and the detailed benefits of becoming a member of a group which happens to use this facility, are getting way WAY off topic. I'm hiding the content for now, and will put an editorial notice in the text as well. If the content should just be removed, please do so (or spin it off into its own article). Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Princess Louise Park Show Centre 

message: I will me making the following changes to the article
-The balloon fiesta see's between 50,000 to 80,000 people now instead of the 35,000 the article says
-Added an update to the history section about how prior to its incorporation, Sussex was known as Sussex Vale from 1810 – 1898 and was a farming community of 185 people. This grew to include the surrounding area of Lower Sussex, which hosted another 25 people. 
-Adding information about the mural tour, as well.  Abusson (talk) 23:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: Hmfgfstu (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingswood University 

message: Hmfgfstu (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agricultural Museum of NB
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Swainstonation

message: On a side note, how can User:70.112.158.200's endorsement be his only contribution? Evil saltine 05:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:70.112.158.200]]

message: does anybody even care about this RFC anymore, nobody has commented on it in about a week--TheNation 13:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  care
Talk:Good Parliament

message: The opening line states that this was the longest parliament when held, however there were some exceptionally long parliaments in Edward II's reign. J.R. Maddicott in 'The origins of the English Parliament' notes that the 1312 session was particularly lengthy, and was indeed longer than the Good Parliament.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.137.48 (talk) 13:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Avalon Series

message: I hope I don't offend any of you by organizing this page. Quite honestly though, it's a jumble of information. I haven't read the books, only stumbled across the series. I've added infoboxes to the books in the series, and updated others.. but while trying to update the infobox I've gotten quite confused as to which actually came first, second, third, etc. in the series chronologically. Hopefully this is the full and correct list of the books, if not please fix it to reflect that, but as a person who hasn't actually read the series, the list was confusing and not very helpful when trying to update the books pages. --ImmortalGoddezz 05:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organized 

message: I never read this series. I had no idea it existed but when I looked up a great series called Avalon: Web of Magic. I want to know what it is like so if you happen to be reading this and you've read this series, please type in what it is about. Thank-you!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.29.66.97 (talk) 22:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  other avalon series 

message: I think we should create :Category:Avalon Series and have this be the flagship page, and we can include in this category all of articles about the books in this series as well as the TV adaptation of Mists. Is this good? Bonechamber (talk) 07:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category for series?
Talk:Castalius rosimon

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Common Pierrot Castalius rosimon by kadavoor.JPG will be appearing as picture of the day on December 11, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-12-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:15, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Common Pierrot Castalius rosimon by kadavoor.JPG]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Ragnarock City

message: I've found zero coverage of this manga. Notability tag has been in place for over a decade with no improvements to article. Redirecting to author's article as an alternative to AfD. Skeletor3000 (talk) 03:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting

message: I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: This article has been sent to AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragnarock City..
GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback from New Page Review process
Talk:Huntley High School

message: I created the stub, and will be editing this, as it was my middle and high school, I just don't have the time do do it right now, but will in the NEAR future.
:Forgot my stamp Danl 06:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: I have recently deleted some material from this article that is simply unencyclopedic.  A vast majority of it is not supported by any references, and in some cases comes across as opinion rather than fact.  This is an encyclopedia.  Facts need to be encyclopedic.  They need to be supported by reliable sources.  In the absence of those sources, claims may be deleted.
If there is some contention that these facts are encyclopedic, and that they an be supported by reliable sources, please talk about it here, and let's see if we can hash them out. LonelyBeacon (talk) 21:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent deletions

message: There is a lot  of edit warring  going  on  in  this article. We need all  the help  we can get  to  bring  school  articles up  to  encyclopedia standards and this article needs much  attention. Editors who  edit  war can face temporary  blocking  in  order to  prevent  disruption, and the article may  be protected so  that  only  admins can edit it. Please do  not  let  it  go  this far. Instead, please see WP:WPSCH/AG for information  on  school  articles, and if there are any  disputes that  cannot  be resolved, editors can always ask  for the opinions of the coordinators of the school project at  WT:WPSCH. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit  warring 
Talk:Egglescliffe

message: It seems like there are more links in the text than actual information about the village. I find myself distracted when every other word is a link.
Many of these links are unnecessary as they lead to one another naturally. For example, the link to the article about Stockton-on-Tees should explain about it being a unitary authority which in turn will surely inform a reader about the Local Government Act and the abolition of certain counties. Why include any of that on this lowly page? --SmartShark (talk) 19:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feels messy
Talk:Lekeitio

message: seems rational, if it only is in one place  DGG ( talk ) 00:23, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[The goose day Lekeitio]] 
Talk:Stein am Rhein

message: Found a new free picture. The old is 10 years old and the new one is also better. 
If someone like you can add it to the article. I dont know how...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/192142502@N04/53041096008
2A02:1210:16F3:8E00:A068:2DEE:F87F:7F1 (talk) 18:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMAGE
Talk:Nørlund–Rice integral

message: Is Method of steepest descent a more specific link for the saddle-point techniques link in the Utility section?  24.177.119.203 06:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Utility 

message: Why does the right side not depend on \alpha?
:I would second and amplify the previous question: the role of \alpha is completely unclear. Is there a typo here, or just something that needs to be explained better? -- Spireguy (talk) 18:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Alpha shows up in the integration contour.  So it is on the right hand side, just not terribly obviously so. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 22:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:Louisville Metro Council

message: I have completed both of the to-do list items. NLahovski (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: To do list
Talk:The Pallbearer

message: Uh... whoever wrote this... did you actually watch this movie?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.35.212.221 (talk) 00:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The plot synopsis
Talk:Hollis/Brookline High School

message: The internet is not serious business. Wikipedia is not serious business. THE HOLLIS BROOKLINE HIGH SCHOOL PAGE IS THE LEAST SERIOUS BUSINESS OF ALL! For the love of raptor jesus, get a life and leave the page alone.
-Management  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.138.214.116 (talk) 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This Page Got Trashed!

message: Do we have any pictures of the senior lounge? I have a pic of the modified Mission Statement and a very Braveheart-looking Shane on Field Day but I don't want to post pictures of anyone without their permission (at least where we can clearly identify who it is). I was thinking of going to the school and taking pictures myself of the track, sports fields, etc. Hollis1138
* I put up a picture of the track from the Middle School website, but wikipedia didn't like what I put for licensing information, so it will be deleted. I'll go over there myself and take some pics. Hollis1138 13:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: I put up a specific section for Advisory Council and Student Council. This can always be removed or changed back to sub-categories under Clubs/Organizations if there's not enough for an entire section. Shane, could you describe how Advisory Council is (was) set up? Thanks. Hollis1138 14:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Student Gov't
Talk:Drexel Gomez

message: The Church in the Province of the West Indies page says he's retired... AnonMoos (talk) 07:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Current status?

message: I removed this reference because despite some evidence that he might have done so, I wasn't able to find a single RS stating this fact.Mistico (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Support for the Anglican Church in North America
Talk:Charles Gore

message: Section 1 says:
Charles Gore was born on 22 January 1853 into an Anglo-Irish aristocratic family[2] as the third son of Hon. Charles Alexander Gore (1811-1897),[3] son of Arthur Gore, 2nd Earl of Arran,[4]
where [4] is a reference to Burke's Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage, 1999, vol. 1, p. 111. I don't have the 1999 edition but the 1959 edition (online) says that C. A. Gore was the brother of the 4th Earl and son of William John Gore (b.1767). That makes C. A. Gore the grandson, not the son, of the 2nd Earl. He can't be the son of the 2nd Earl anyway because that Earl died in 1809, 2 years before C. A. Gore was born.
Therefore I'm just about to correct "son" to "grandson". --Heron (talk) 17:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect relationship to 2nd Earl of Arran
Talk:Frank Griswold

message: Take a look at this. There's a few parts of text copied straight off, and most of it slightly rewritten. Would it be OK if we cite it as the source? Archer7 17:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: There's no mention here in his bio, but wondered if there is any close relationship between Frank Griswold and former presiding bishop Alexander Viets Griswold? MarmadukePercy (talk) 01:05, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention 

message: This article indicates Edmund Browning, 24th Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, in the info box as his principal consecrator. But, in the section on the topic, it lists the 23rd Presiding Bishop. Which one is correct?JustTryintobeJust (talk) 13:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the consecrator named in the infobox. John Allin has been listed as the principal consecrator in this article for longer and it now matches what's listed here. Browning was likely added to the infobox by mistake; perhaps the editor was confused because its usually the current presiding bishop who is the main consecrator. BUT, none of this is referenced, so if anyone had a source that would be very helpful. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk  12:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion over principal consecrator? 
Talk:John Habgood

message: Hello, does anybody know if there are any guidelines or protocols in place for creating and editing pages to do with the Aristocracy ? Let me explain the problem,  Aristocrats presents particular problems because they have a variety of names, honourifics and titles and these titles go down the generations. Ive been editing Francis Habgood who will inherit John Habgood's title when he dies. But Baron Habgood is a redirect page to John Habgood it occurs to me Baron Habgood should really be a different page to explain the baronetcy itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmcst1 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate Baron Habgood for the Baronetcy
Talk:Barbara Harris (bishop)

message: I read in the Gene Robinson article that Harris also wore a bulletproof vest during her ordination. Is this true? This strikes me as notable for inclusion. - BalthCat (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  In a Wall St. Journal, Bishop Catherine Roskam says Harris was urged to wear a bullet-proof vest but refused. Rockam appears closer to Harris and the WSJ is a stronger source, so will go with Roskam. Amedea (talk) 18:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulletproof vest
Talk:Basil Harwood

message: some of these seem to be publication dates, eg sonata no 2 was published in 1912 but may have been composed earlier?... sonata 1 was published in 1890, do not know where 1886 is from. Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  composition dates 

message: This page is entirely not notable, and Monica Harwood, a family member, seems to have written and added to this article solely for egotistical purposes.HAL333 19:56, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-written it from reliable published sources. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is not notable, and has been written by someone close to the subject
Talk:David Hope, Baron Hope of Thornes

message: I've found these 3 links (amongst others), none of them specifcally mention the bit about being happy, but I suspect that the book referred to in the Yorkshire Post article would, but don't have access to it:
http://www.petertatchell.net/outing/mediamendacity.htm
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/ViewArticle.aspx?SectionID=105&ArticleID=886985
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/12/05/ncofe05.xml
I can't persuade searches of the UK press to give the original coverage from back in 1995 which would settle it once and for all.  David Underdown 12:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation request 

message: a search for his predecessor as +London also contains some hits relevant to this article http://www.gazettes-online.co.uk/SearchResults.aspx?GeoType=London&st=adv&sb=date&exact=Graham%20Douglas%20Leonard&  David Underdown (talk) 10:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional refs 
Talk:Michael Ingham (bishop)

message: Whole phrases, sentences and paragraphs have been lifted verbatim from a website without a single quotation mark to be found. 213 of the 324 words have been lifted directly. Yes, the source is listed but no indication whether permission was sought and received to reproduce almost the entire text of the website. Deleted copied text.
Cheers. Wassupwestcoast 03:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy & Pasted from a source, possibly in violation of copyright

message: Although the article states
"has been the subject of extensive media coverage"
 
there is not a single reference to this. If it is so extensive, cite it!
Or, delete it.
Cheers, 216.86.122.87 03:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done and done. Fishhead64 21:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads too much like an opinion
Talk:Penny Jamieson

message: That's how she's described in the first sentence, but I suspect that we should use one term for the honour or the other, not both. Anyone know for sure? Grutness...wha? 08:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct.  Having both is redundant. Fishhead64 15:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Being a member of a parish in Auckland, and active in the wider church, I don't think it is at all accurate to describe the church as a "predominantly male institution". This indicates a lack of balance.Ncox 01:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its use in the article indicates clearly that it refers to the church as it was at the time, which was very much male-dominated. there has been a lot of change in the Anglican Church in the last few years. Have a look at (picking an article on the subject at random) this article to give some indication of the change. Grutness...wha? 23:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dr. Jamieson PhD"? 
Talk:Peter Jensen (bishop)

message: Correction on Reference 3 is required as when I clicked on it this evening it led to the telegraph.co.uk home page. Nothing on Peter Jensen there.Jackandkira (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction on References

message: I have removed material from  that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac (Doc) 22:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removals 