Talk:Forskolin

message: I personally do not think it is good that the article is comprised mostly of catchphrases without a coherent body of text. Also I think references should only be visible at the bottom of the page and links to websites or articles should be in a section "further reading". Would I have the consent to change it accordingly or is any one else willing to take action?
Adeptus (talk) 13:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Style

message: Does anyone know where the name "Forskolin" comes from? You've gotta admit, it sounds strangely like "foreskin." (I tried to make a joke about this at a journal club meeting one day and was met with a painful stony silence.) -- FP (talk)(edits) 12:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer my own question, it comes from the name of the herb Coleus forskohlii, a member of the mint family. Nothing to do with foreskins. What a stupid question. Sigh. -- 
See Peter Forsskål in Wikipedia
FP (talk)(edits) 12:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name?

message: Carbolin 19, the sale name for an anobolic dietry supplement.
tablets contain 20mg of Colforsin 1,9 ethylcarbonate ester.  
I have not been able to find any papers about this particular compound.
Is there any detailed info out there on its action on human subjects?
: If it's an ester then I assume it just hydrolyses to give colforsin/forskolin
: 88.196.42.236 22:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carbolin 19 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Despite this not being a medical article (on disease or medicine) lots of material has been deleted (Oct 2015) citing WP:MEDRS. This seems lazy and heavy handed and leaves the article unbalanced. Rather than removing the entire section it would be more constructive to flag/identify the items that need better sources. Is WP:MEDRS applicable to everything here or just to medical claims ? - Rod57 (talk) 03:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of Chemical, biological and medical potential 

message: I am writing to ask about the types of sources this article's curators would favor. Looking at WP:HEALTHRS, it just seems as if it would benefit from a review of the literature. The youngest article cited here is already six years old. Much has happened since. Would you share your thoughts about more recent sources like this one in Nature?  Thanks. Caballero//Historiador ☊  13:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: There is a section on cAMP, but there are numerous studies showing this chemical also increases cGMP.  There should be a section with at least a similar level of detail as the cAMP section for cGMP.  I lack the editing prowess to create it myself 50.84.144.90 (talk) 19:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  cGMP section needed 

message: Took the drug and it without out doubt has D2 receptor up regulation and possible agonism. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7851491/.
The article I posted shows the testing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7080:F83F:4F5A:111D:6AFC:7576:A84B (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  D2 long receptors up-regulation and sensitivity?