lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saraswati veena

message: This article should be the main article and the Saraswati veena article should be merged into this one. There are a few different variations of the Veena and they should be covered in this article. VasuVR (talk) 12:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saraswati Veena 

message: --Opus88888 (talk) 18:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Sarinda (instrument)

message: I know that many Nepalis call the Sarinda a "Sarangi", however, this is a colloqial misnomer. 
The actually classical Hindustani Sarangis proper are also being used by some Nepali Hindustani classical instrumentalists. This article describes the folk instrument as used by stree musicans and mendicants.There is not even a close resemblance (as with the Sindhi Sarangi) between the two. Having two "Sarangi" pages out there creates further confusion. The so called Sarangi (Nepali) is in fact a Sarinda. At least, it is within the Sarinda family, and not within the sarangi group. Either the page needs to be renamed into Sarinda (Nepali) or be merged with Sarinda.95.223.187.171 (talk) 03:48, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Sarangi (Nepali)]] with Sarinda

message: Perhaps someone with more knowledge on the subject than myself would care to research the Sarinda's use in Afghanistan, since I don't see mention of it there in the main Article. --Frankwm1 (talk) 23:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good point. It *IS* used there with no doubt, e. g. Abdul Rashid recorded several tracks with the sarinda. -andy 05:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afghanistan
Talk:West Virginia coal wars

message: Is there a reason that the term "high-powered rifles" is used repeatedly in the introduction? Given the numbers involved, and no mention of other rifles, I doubt they're anything particularly powerful. Totensiebush (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to this talk page driven by the same curiosity: what on earth are those “high-powered rifles”? --Filippof (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: High powered rifles

message: Hired goons?  That is pretty biased. Rebelyell2006 (talk) 02:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've changed "hired goons" to "Baldwin-Felts detectives" as well as clarified that the minors involved were local. I'll also note that any Wikipedia article on the unionization movement in WV will like be biased towards the union and against the coal operators. That is in part because the sources that will be used are biased towards the union. When I was in school, our 8th grade WV history book painting the Baldwin-Felts and the company owners as villains. —Farix (t | c) 00:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, those men were murdered, it is recorded as a historical fact. However, this article ia a POV and will be edited when I get to it. There are unbiased sources.....Ever try to look at the Mingo County Courthouse archives????Coal town guy (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV questionable 

message: Idk if anyone is paying much attention to this page, but I am adding some sections as part of a school project. Primarily, I am combining information on the coal wars as a whole, with sections for each eventKeatonH-NCF (talk) 02:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dec 2017 Additions
Talk:Dräger (company)

message: I marked the article as biased since large parts sound as if they were written by the company's PR department. In particular the sections "Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG" and "Dräger Safety AG & Co. KGaA" are affected. --84.159.157.201 22:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Shafaatullah Khan

message: Most of this seems to be straight from his website. Do we know much about his music? Are there any other sources about him?Rasputin98 19:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any new stuff 
Talk:Shehnai

message: Is the Shenai usually made of wood? Is the bell the only metal section?==Design (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Construction

message: Is the shehnai a double reed instrument, as stated in the introductory paragraph, or quadruple reed, as stated further below and in other articles? SteubenGlass (talk) 00:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reeds 

message: This article is about the instrument, and as such I've reorganized some of the information to make it more universal. I've changed the header from "Shehnai players in India" to simply "Notable players", in order for more notable players from outside India to be added. In addition, I've removed the recently inserted images that placed undue weight on the players and not the instrument itself. As this and other shehnai-related articles have been subject to COI edits recently, I've added this page to my watchlist and will be patrolling it to ensure it remains neutral and free from COI edits. PaintedCarpet (talk) 17:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edit 

message: The current text contains:
"It usually has between six and nine holes."
This text means it usually has either seven or eight holes. Why not write:
"It usually has seven or eight holes."
then? If, on the other hand, six and nine holes are meant to be included, I would suggest:
"It usually has from six to nine holes inclusive."
Could someone knowledgeable inform me how many holes a shehnai (usually) has?Redav (talk) 20:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple version of "between 6 and 9" and is "7 or 8" 

message: 10 2402:3A80:196B:A74F:678:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shehnai
Talk:Peace of Pressburg (1805)

message: Calling the city Bratislava when referring to pre-1919 events is as misleading as calling Byzantium Istanbul when referring to ancient times, to give you a covincing example. Even fans of too much political correctness have to acknowledge that. Please change it to something like "(today Bratislava)" as there *were* not signed in Bratislava but merely in a place whose name was later changed to Bratislava. The Congress of Laibach, however, did indeed take place in Ljubljana. --128.176.232.5 22:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bratislava
Talk:Vanderbijlpark

message: I'm changing the name of this article to "Vanderbijlpark" to fit in with Wikipedia convention.  If there are any objections, please discuss it here. Niël 01:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name change

message: Is it 200,000 or 80,000. There's a contradiction. 122.167.87.216 (talk) 07:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: I've just done a large reversion in the article to remove a load of rubbish. Unfortunately a few good edits also ended up in the trash. Please help to get the article back into proper shape. Roger (talk) 09:59, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed disruptive content
Talk:Sikkil Mala Chandrasekar

message: Wkipedia is good  for knowledge. Some spelling mistake only................................................................ Rajila Peethambaran Unny Karta (talk) 02:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikipedia
Talk:Sikkil Sisters

message: Newspaper-'The Hindu' states that Kunjumani died at the age of 83. But the birth date in the article gives her age as 80 when she died?--Booradleyp1 (talk) 14:14, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Age
Talk:Simhadri (2003 film)

message: first of all this movie is bullshit.kerala is portrayed in such a way to suit this telegu movie.Malyalees dont understand telegu ,not to say ,many dont know where is andhra!it is not a neighbouring state for kerala.
It is the fancy for beautiful people from kerela that attracts this type of movies to be made.and like many others ,here in this film too we can see them expecting malyalam is same as tamil.but ,singamalai -is a tamil word.if ever malyalees call such a name -it is "simhakutty" .I have learned malyalam quiet a bit staying in kerela. 
-Hemant Deshpande(native of dharwad ,karnataka) 59.93.32.234 (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FACTUAL ERRORS IN THIS MOVIE
Talk:Money Island (Branford, Connecticut)

message: Their is no longer a Church on the island, it is all residential... I have a book on the history of the Thimbles so I will update historical history on all of the islands.
Kimech1
:Excellent. Thanks. Gzuckier 16:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:International Plus, Advanced & Challenge Square Dance Convention

message: I couldn't find a way to link directly to the text in the club page, since it is Flash-based. They've also disabled cut and paste, but if you click on the "IPAC" heading there is a letter from Steffen Mauring, President and Founder, explaining the reasons for the convention's cancellation.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.212.163 (talk) 20:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancellation of iPAC 13

message: A great big thanks go to User:!jim for making the translation from the German article.  --SFDan 16:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks for translation
Talk:Underground Garage

message: This article needs quite a bit of work.
When it was created it was started as though the Underground Garage was just a satellite radio channel.
In fact it is (somewhat confusingly) a name that is used for TWO separate entities and outlets - both created by the same person.  The syndicated radio show heard on terrestrial FM radio preceded the satellite radio channel by a couple of years.
Both outlets seem to be comparatively successful.  If it was felt essential to list the satellite channel separately from the terrestial weekly radio show (even though they share the same title, creator and mission) then there could be two separate articles.  Since the musical format of the satellite channel is an expansion of the format of the weekly show - I think it is more logical to have everything on one page.
I will do my best with this article.  I would appreciate help!   Davidpatrick 22:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I have been listening to Little Stephen's Underground Garage off and on for two or three years now.   But I never seem to notice any commercials in it.   At least in the area local to Portland Oregon.  This must mean that affiliated radio stations (such as 92.3FM KGON) pay dearly for the right to access it, and  broadcast it, and then recoup the associated expenses by running commercials before and after it, rather than during it?
Are there any affiliates that intersplice radio commercials in it, so it comes through, utterly loaded to the hilt with commercials?   
The main page of this article could be improved by mentioning its "market value" (whatever that might be).   Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 05:36, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The money angle 
Talk:Surinder Shinda

message: shinda from punjab chitti born jatt sikh surname/gotra Paul -) surinder singh paul, also shinda dislike bhatias, tarkhans & others shinda was true jatt singer along with kuldip mankan --89.241.184.205 (talk) 16:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is a referenced article. Any further reverts will result in a block.--SH 17:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: surinder shinda
Talk:Swara

message: Could somebody please add this in the table  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.134.164.26 (talk) 23:56, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Equivalence of carnatic swara with hindustani and western 

message: The marks above and below the note are fairly obsolete nowadays. Discussion of how the notation is made by capital and lowercase letters ought to be expanded. Calaf 20:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing system

message: Several details mentioned in this article are not applicable or incorrect considering Carnatic classical music. For example, it is mentioned that each Swara may designate up to two different pitches. But in Carnatic Classical Music, each swara may designate up to three different pitches. The terms komal, tivar are not used in Carnatic Classical Music. Instead, the different pitches are distinguished with the prefixes Suddha, Chatushruthi, Shatshruthi, Sadharana, Antara, etc.
- Jayarama Nettar 14:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information
Talk:Swarmandal

message: I believe this is a zither, not a harp. Badagnani (talk) 23:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a harp

message: SO is it Swarmandal or Swaramandal ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carusus (talk • contribs) 12:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Shafted

message: This seems like quite a big article for a show that ran for only four episodes...
Ibroadfo 22:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: I don't remember the show with complete clarity, but I'm pretty certain the entire bit about the "Master Shafter" is completely made up. I'm going to remove it anyway; it can always be put back if I'm wrong (though it seems far too stupid to be true - even in this show). --PaulTaylor 21:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * Agreed. Even if true, the language just isn't right for an encyclopedia article. 86.134.2.69 12:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Master shafter 

message: I'm not so sure that "Share or Shaft" is as much a Prisoner's Dilemma as it is a game of Chicken. I would say that shareing would be like swerving and that shafting would be like continuing on straight ahead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goobie m (talk • contribs) 01:29, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prisoner's Dilemma 

message: Not a single part of this  article is correctly cited and the refernce given mentions two lines about the show:
"More recently, Robert Kilroy Silk descended into TV mediocrity in 2001 as the host of Shafted, which revolved around whether two contestants could trust each other enough to share the proceeds of a jackpot."
That is all it says. If I knew how I would tag it for speedy deletion. Zibart (talk) 19:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs deleting 

message: From memory, I think the questions often had deliberately misleading openings. For example, with the opening part "Prince William...", after bets are placed it's revealed to be about Prince William Sound the place, not the royal. Words could even be split, "Which muscle..." being completed to a question about a "muscleman actor". I have no citation for this though, and it might have been a different show pulling the trick. 94.194.66.92 (talk) 09:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nature of incomplete questions. 

message: In the Format section under "Winners" there seems to be truncated sentence that makes no sense: "UJ won the most money, thus being the most shafted, ........ " ??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.146.217.117 (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Winners" 

message: I never watched it so not aware, why was it cancelled, viewing figures, mocking from the press etc.?
Middle More Rider (talk) 18:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dropped after 4 episodes
Talk:Grounds For Sculpture

message: The Grounds For Sculpture are Unbelievable I was there  few monthes ago. Watch by photos THE PHOTOS GK tramrunner 22:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 comments

message: Soon after adding a set of beautiful photos to this page which I took on many, many visits to GFS, I was notified by Commons that they were all copy-write infringements. I argued on the deletions talk page, but they were soon all deleted. I looked into it and it does seem that in the USA a photo of a sculpture in a non-public area is problematic. (What an idiotic legal system!) That being the case, I do not understand why any sculpture photos remain in Commons. They seemed to pick on mine! But, since some are still available, I used a few of the remaining ones to improve the page again. I hope these stick. Looked awful having an art museum page without any pictures! RobP (talk) 00:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems unfair. Your photos should be kept if you took them properly without any BLP issues. I don't think Grounds for Sculpture qualifies as a private area since it is open to the public for viewing (although a fee is charged). People can even see the sculptures from outside the grounds so in a real sense it is a public place, and there are many precedents for being able to photograph public sculptures and include those photos in Commons. So I think your photos should be kept. Is there a link to your photos on Commons so I may argue for their inclusion?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 01:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks so much for the support but they have already been deleted from commons.  So... the park is quite large and you really can't see most of the ones that I photographed from the outside (but one was) - and as you said they do charge admission so maybe that's the problem. But I will never understand why the pictures of the same sculptures that are still in Commons are still there. RobP (talk) 02:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to understand the many, often conflicting, guidelines about photos in Commons, and my sense is that even administrators there don't always have a clear idea of what is allowed and what isn't. And then what happens in Commons itself is determined what happens in the wider legal world of copyright laws and such, so in many respects it is an ongoing mishmash. All I can say is that if, in future, you have photos you think should go there, and they're put up for deletion, please let me know, and I can help argue that they stay.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks again. I still have all the photos obviously and can try to repost some of them. Will likely do that over the weekend. Counting on you now! :-) RobP (talk) 11:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok will try but no promises. Will be unavailable most of November.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 2016 comments
Talk:Thaat

message: I have to commend the writers / editors of this page - good job with showing the Western modal aspects with respect to thaat. Gautam  01:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Well Done

message: What comes after it?!  All this talk about attacking the 'Great Indian Culture' is rather funny too.  No one's trying to hurt your culture mate.  (Y) 86.162.151.136 (talk) 23:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: That Colon

message: The third line of the diagram is labelled Bhairav, but should be Bhairavi since it shows E. Apologies for not correcting it - I don't have software to let me do this. --Stfg (talk) 10:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in musical diagram 

message: The third scale diagram and sixth scale diagram show the similar type of notes.
Assuming the sixth scale diagram "Bhairavi" thaat notes are correct, then third scale diagram "Bhairav" thaat requires correction. The notes Ga and Ni are not flat (komal) notes but are natural (shuddh) notes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.161.63 (talk) 14:14, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further to the error in Musical Diagram Scale 

message: Dear Active members what i observed is that the staff notation for bhairav notation
compared to indian music which is described below(carnatic music - Maya malawa gowla raagam) has shown wrong i think. If I am right then please consent otherwise leave a comment for me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkkameshwar (talk • contribs) 13:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  difference in staff notation in relation to indian music terminology 

message: Could you please look into finding and comparing reliable sources on the western equivalent/definition for thaat? I've seen sources equate them to modes. Others equate them to "scale types" or "parent scales" rather than just "scales". I believe "parent scales" (much like melas) are the most apt. Thanks.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 09:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mode vs. Scale vs. Scale type
Talk:Parni Valjak

message: Jedan od najboljih bendova svih vremena ^^ Obozavam ih! SSJ 5 22:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Alladiya Khan

message: Article links are dead here. Please look into them. --209.79.200.99 06:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by [[User:209.79.200.99|209.79.200.99]]
Talk:V. Ramarathnam

message: The following is a third party reference to the Biographyy of Prof. V. Ramarathnam. 
*Sunday Times of India 1994 interview by S. Ramanathan
The purpose is to provide doumentation and evidence for Notability, verifiability of the contents on V._Ramarathnam's page.
Kssrinivasan 16:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vanaspati

message: This article is a nice idea. But since it doues not give chapter and verse od the texts mentioned, it is quite wortless.
greetings P. Bremerke  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.194.46.104 (talk) 19:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Kates Hill

message: Who was Kate.....that Kate's hill was named after 82.39.176.220 (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kate's hill 

message: Who was Kate......that Kate's hill was named after Jaykeikei (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kate's hill
Talk:Sant Bani School

message: This: .  Please remember WP:CIVIL.  And no one needs "permission" to create or contribute to any article on any subject on Wikpedia. Ripogenus77 22:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding 158.65.161.112's edit summary 

message: Please, remember that civility and a neutral point of view are two of the five pillars of Wikipedia, and the Sant Bani School wishes to maintain a page where these standards are followed. SBSalum92 (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: "Sciolists" comment
Talk:Glas Koncila

message: The article gushes about Glas Koncila a little bit too much for my taste. Not everything about GK smells like roses: the article mentions "openness", but this openness extends only right of center. KG is not merely a good-natured Church publication, but often times a platform for the extreme right. That put aside, the article could still use some toning down. GregorB 22:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Toned down somewhat. Removed the POV tag. GregorB (talk) 00:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Cf. "Kako je skrenuo Glas Koncila. Skrenuo udesno..." . Not merely far right platform, but also a vehicle for rather persistent Holocaust revisionism, according to the article. GregorB (talk) 19:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

text: Also "Glas Koncila objavljuje revizionističku ‘nizanku‘ o Jasenovcu. O ustaškim klanjima nema ni slova" . GregorB (talk) 11:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Vishal–Shekhar

message: Slowly rising to the top?
Isn't that a judgement that Wikipedia shouldn't be making? I'm going to remove that bit of POV, and I'm going to hope the rest of it isn't that bad. Too tired to do any more. --Phant 08:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Poopy?
I have removed that edit.
It was done by 68.197.99.151
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poopy? 

message: I have removed the part which says vishal was a VJ.In a recent interview he told that he was never a VJ.Prav001 (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: VJ

message: I think it is time that they both should have separate pages along with this one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandy13991 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Time to split??
Talk:Yoddha (1992 film)

message: Besides the abduction of a divine child, there is nothing in common with 'The Golden Child'. The Golden Child is an entirely different movie  with entirely different characters, plot and screenplay. The 'savior' and the child don't even meet in that film. Do watch the film before making such editors.49.207.220.15 (talk) 09:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a REMAKE of GOLDEN child.