Talk:Casimir I the Restorer

message: With regards to Talk:List_of_Polish_monarchs#Naming, here are the results of Google test for Casimir vs Kazimierz:
* Casimir - 1,250,000 hits
* Casimirus - 826 hits 
* Kazimierz - 740,000
* Casimir I - 807
* Casimirus I - 28
* Kazimierz I - 1379
* Casimir Odnowiciel - 27
* Kazimierz Odnowiciel - 1070
* Casimir the Restorer - 1110
* Casimirus the Restorer - 18
* Kazmierz the Restorer - 12
* Casimir I the Restorer - 670
* Casimirus I the Restorer - none
* Kazmierz I the Restorer - 3
* Casimir I Odnowiciel - 
* Casimirus I Odnowiciel - none
* Kazimierz I Odnowiciel - 761
Tallies: 
* Casimir 2600 vs Kazimierz 3200; Kazimierz wins
* roman numeral vs no roman numeral - 2200 vs 2200, close tie
* Odnowiciel vs the Restorer - 1800 vs 1800, close tie
In accordance with my propoal at 
With the proposed guideline Talk:List_of_Polish_monarchs#Naming, I'd like to move this article to Kazimierz I the Restorer. Through this name seems not to be the most popular, it is made of the most popular components, and I'd like to standarise all Polish king names to Polish name/roman numeral/Nickname in English or second name in Polish.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:00, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Small update: I am not sure how google does his magic and why there are more hits for "Casimir I of Poland" (950) then "Casimir I" (860). The first one is mostly wiki and it's mirrors reflecting the old title before the move. If counted, it would give a slight win to Casimir (3450 vs 3200), but again shows how "of Poland" (with only 12 "Kazimierz I of Poland") is unused outside Wiki.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old most popular name count

message: This page needs to be moved back to an English title.  Before we submit the "Requested move" paperwork, what is the consensus on what it should be called? --22:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we're all in agreement that the article needs to be moved back to an English name, but the question is whether or not it should be "Casimir I", "Casimir I of Poland" or "Casimir I the Restorer".  Personally, I'm up for any of them, as long as it gets the article off of "Kazimierz".  But which one should we request? --Elonka 23:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sigh. That means we use endlessly time for these and others already materially solved. And "the Restorer", or plain "Casimir I" were not those which won C III. I do not want inconsistency. This should be just moved to "Casimir I of Poland" and go to other issues - there are names of monarchs whose naming was not yet polled. Casimir I of Poland is the name given by naming convention. Besides, there have been others named Casimir I, such as some Silesian and Masovian dukes, and were there some German princelings too... That's one of the reasons behind naming convention: those named Casimir I are pre-emptively disambiguated by country name. Shilkanni 23:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  We seem to all be in agreement, so I have made it so.  :) --Elonka 23:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page renaming 

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as a nominator.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  12:58, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nom. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *But we are keeping Casimir I? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

text: *And this proposal is intended to bring the few inconsistent names in line with the rest... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  02:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

text: *False, as shown by example below.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Latin? Greek? Something Slavic? Thanks in advance. JoshNarins (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost certainly Polish. Some courtiers might have spoken Latin, German and various Slavonic languages... but that's pure speculation.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  00:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  If we are guessing, my guess is Latin, and German was not even a factor. The court of the Holy Roman Empire would have been speaking Latin at this time (and would be for centuries more), as would any social-climber. The article says Casimir isn't allowed to crown himself King by orders of the Emperor. Pretty much the first written vernaculars were emerging in this period, and one can't help but think that the languages in question were seen as the language of the commoners, i.e. peasants. JoshNarins (talk) 09:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was the Language of the Court of Casimir I 

message: I hope nobody objects; I've changed the default sort order in the categories. It had been set to sort as Restorer, Casimir I the. At least in Category:House of Piast it makes more sense--and is more consistent with the bulk of the other entries--to have it sort as Casimir. If anybody feels that it should be the other way in some other category, perhaps they could change it for that particular category, rather than across the board.  71.126.140.136 (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change categories' sort orders 

message: " ...his relative the Emperor Henry III..." ?? Exactly how are they supposed to be related? Casimir's maternal grandmother was Ottonian dynasty, Henry III was Salian. Casimir's mother probably pulled some strings in her family network - but "relative" - not very close.... / Ola  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.247.27.221 (talk) 14:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Henry III ? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Augustus II the Strong which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 14:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress