lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fantasia (1940 film)

message: @Onel5969 deleted this twice as "promotional blurb". It came off a library description of the set:
The following is the publisher's description:Documentary on the animated motion picture Fantasia (1940) and its restoration and re-release in 1990. The story of the making of the film is interspersed with interviews and commentaries by Walt Disney, conductor Leopold Stokowski, creative artists involved in the production, critics, and others, as well as substantial excerpts from the film itself. Of special interest to dancers is archival footage of the Ballet Russe de Monte Carlo, featuring Marge Champion, which formed the basis for the Dance of the Hours. Included in the documentary is unused footage for Debussy's Clair de lune, Prokofiev's Peter and the Wolf, and the Bumble Boogie, a swing version of Rimsky-Korsakov's Flight of the Bumblebee.
deisenbe (talk) 14:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I deleted it once.  also deleted it. For the same rationale. Publisher's descriptions are purely promotional (as they should be, from their perspective), and have no place in an encyclopedia.Onel5969 TT me 14:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to see the missing pieces 

message: Wizards do not exist in this film. There is a magic user that is sorcerer who has an apprentice but that is not the same thing. I removed :Category:Wizards in film from the article as there was no mention of a wizard in the article text so by WP:CATVER that category is not supported by anything in the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A sorcerer is not a wizard 

message: Can you add a comma at the end of in 1998? 68.12.168.117 (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: - FlightTime (open channel) 03:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2022 

message: I mean can you add a comma between in 1998 and the American Film Institute ranked it as the 58th greatest American film in their 100 Years...100 Movies and the fifth greatest animated film in their 10 Top 10 list. ? 68.12.168.117 (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . Heartmusic678 (talk) 16:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2022 (2) 

message: In the home media section, it fails to mention the non-r1 dvd contains the laserdisc and vhs edit, but has the 2000 Corey Burton narration. Homemediahero (talk) 03:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. 💜  melecie  talk - 05:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 June 2022
Talk:Cherokee

message: Include him to the list of famous Cherokee persons in the article, he's an enrolled tribal member of the Cherokee Nation. https://www.oklahoman.com/story/special/2021/04/05/kevin-stitt-oklahomas-first-cherokee-governor/4760388001/
:I only see one list of famous people and there's a header that says "This includes only Cherokee documented in history. Contemporary notable Cherokee people are listed in the articles for the appropriate tribe." Cannolis (talk) 22:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kevin Stitt, governor of Oklahoma 

message: I visited the Biltmore Estate specifically to see what I understand as the last remaining mound there..the person selling the $80 tickets knew nothing about it..as I understand it they were numerous originally which makes sense as it is where two rivers come together..it should be in the article if anyone knows more about it  
Anonymous8206 (talk) 23:50, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biltmore 

message: The Smithers citation given for this does not draw the conclusion that there is "no evidence" of "two spirit" people in historical Cherokee culture. Rather, it clearly indicates that documentary evidence is ambiguous and that, to paraphrase, written accounts are given undue weight over oral history and other traditions. Additionally, just as we do not need a paragraph discounting a Moon made of green cheese in that article, it makes no sense to have a paragraph discounting Two-spirit identities if there is "no evidence" and no indication of controversy. This reads like someone with an agenda inserted it, rather than Wikipedia:npov. Pyrocatch (talk) 22:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender roles & "Two Spirit"
Talk:Standardized test

message: 05:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

message: It is unclear as to what 'reliable' means and 'by some people' is not justified or sourced. Stjohn1970 (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear  

message: Standardized test are not an accurate  measure of intelligence  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.114.173.207 (talk) 13:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not aware of any non-standardized test for intelligence.  All of the generally accepted IQ tests are standardized tests.  Perhaps you meant to write something like "The test you have to pass to earn South Africa's National Senior Certificate is not an IQ test"? WhatamIdoing (talk) 13:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English FAL 
Talk:Toward the Light

message: This section is teeming with unverifiable claims of contact with the transcendental world. I tried to clean up some of it and tag areas that could use some work. There should be a succinct (and encyclopedic) way of stating that the account listed in that section is the claim of Agerskov, and not presented here in Wikipedia as fact.
"According to Agerskov, the first "golden fruit" turned out to be a collection of poems written by deceased Danish poets. Johanne Agerskov's spirit learned the poems by heart during her sleep..." makes it sound as though only the first statement is a claim, while the rest is all verified. Any ideas on improving this? WDavis1911 03:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The three golden fruits

message: This is not meant to be verifiable info by normal means.  Even the authors are somewhat irrelevant.  This is a work that should be read by all and through their conscience determine if the information would be worth using for themselves.  This is just a personal note but I have seen the proof of truth about the info relayed and know it to be true.  I could care less about trivial historic matters when I know the information provided will change the world for the good.  I see so many get caught up in the "verifiable" details that they pass up what they need to know for spiritual progression.  If you will, read at least the first group of Q and A's and the speech of Christ and you will find out what you need to know.  Your decision does not require verifying the authors or their experiences.  They are not trying to start a religion or gain followers, only relay this help for humanity.    
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.228.92.1 (talk) 01:17, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  unverifiable 

message: Someone has removed the photos from this article without making any comments about why the pictures have been deleted. I have now put them back in the text, and if anyone wants to remove them again, I hope he/she will explain why this is done. There has been some controversy in Denmark about the publishing of photos of Johanne Agerskov, but pictures of here can be seen many places on the internet, so I see no reason whatsoever to not publish her picture on wikipedia.--Sverre avnskog (talk) 01:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:Worker safety and health

message: 'OSH' and 'Worker Safety' are surely the same thing. If it is deemed necessary to have an Article on OSHA US then thats ok. The present article seems to cover this and has an overall International approach. I like the definitions of "Hazard, Risk and Outcomes". The British also defined "Danger" on the grounds that Danger may be quite obvious to most people but some Hazards may be hidden, such as toxic vapours or fumes. (Legal concepts of - Danger, Hazard & Risk are defined in BS5304: Now PD5304: Safe use of Machinery. Following advances in technology and changing domestic legislation together with the publication of a series of harmonised European Standards BS5304 of 1988 has been replaced by PD5304: 2000 Safe use of machinery. Available from the British Standards Institution.)
In Ireland we have the latest "Safety, health and Welfare at work Act, 2005". That follows from a long line of legislation, starting with the Factory & Workshops Act 1901-1920, Adapted and adopted by Constitution of Ireland Art 50 (Art 73/1922)and used until 1955. See Health and Safety Authority website http://www.hsa.ie/ 2 --Conh 15:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: merged. Ctbolt 07:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Merger

message: from http://osha.europa.eu/legislation/index2.stm
European Legislation
A number of Directives has been established to protect the health and safety of Europe's workers. This section provides information on and links to websites covering these Directives. In addition information on relevant European Proposals is available. Other texts relative to legislation are also provided.
See, on the above web site, one of the categories below.
Directives 
EU-Proposals 
Other texts 
--Conh 16:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: EU Directives
Talk:Party designation in early United States Congresses

message: I had suggested nomenclature for the Democratic-Republican party on my talk page, -- based on designation from the source as simply "Republican" and my impression that self-designation at the time was "Republican".  Leaving it there, and disambiguating the link was my choice.  I'm not sure how to proceed if that choice is sufficiently unacceptable to motivate changing it.  I'm certainly not sufficiently motivated to follow Zoe's lead and change nomenclature in other places.  I think disambiguating language is not needed in the text of an article, when the context serves to do so.  BobCMU76 22:43 May 12, 2003 (UTC)
Do you have some info that says that they called themselves Republicans before Democratic-Republicans?  If so, then, yes this should be reverted.  But AFAIK, they were Democratic-Republicans, then became Democrats.  I have no problem with changing it, if you can show us that what I did was false.  -- Zoe
At least http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp from the congress' website declares them as Republican, e.g. search for Year OR Congress 1. -- JeLuF 11:53 May 15, 2003 (UTC)
[Some stuff about Parties.  I'm happy either way, but favor consistency.  I see Presidents listed as "Democratic-Republican" and I don't care to mess with that.  This page is written in the context of a source which calls them "Republican" and the link I cited supports that.
:I've been looking at the web -- so many people saying so many contradictory things.  I should have saved the citation, but what I'm learning is that the Republican Party in the 1830's (around the time of the Jackson/Adams split) was briefly called "Democratic-Republican" by the Jacksonian faction, before becoming simply "Democrats", and "National Republican" by the Adams faction, before becoming "Whigs".  As JeLuF's fine work getting the databases onto Wikipedia continues -- these later divisions are going to be calling for just as much attention as the early divisions. BobCMU76 14:10 May 15, 2003 (UTC)
----
Note For the deletion debate for this article see Talk:Party designation in early United States Congresses/delete -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 23:33, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Virgin birth of Jesus/Archive 2

message: See also:
* Talk:Virgin_birth_(arguments)(_archive)
----
I looked up parthenos in Liddell & Scott, btw, and "virgin" isn't the only meaning. See additions to Virgin birth (arguments). Jacquerie27 18:59 May 12, 2003 (UTC)
: LOL. Weren't you reluctant to use Liddell & Scott when I first mentioned them, since they surveyed the general usage of words and not just how they were used in the Bible? Never mind. Did you see the definitions someone gave on the Virgin Birth discussion page? It appears to be from a modern edition of a Greek dictionary that includes meanings prior to the middle ages. Should we incorporate that information as well? I haven't compared the two in detail, it may be redundant. Wesley 21:25 May 12, 2003 (UTC)
I had added some of the varient meanings of parthenos to the Virgin Birth page, which Jacquerie27 appropriately incorporated into this page.  My source was Geza Vermes.  The list of definitions from the modern Greek dictionary, on the VB talk page, is consistent with Vermes' account.  Nevertheless, I hesitate to add them to this article because they come from a modern Greek dictionary.  The issue at hand is how people used the word in the first or second centuries CE.  Ideally, we should stick to research on that period. Slrubenstein
: You're probably right about the modern Greek dictionary. I would extend the period under consideration to between the second century BC to the second century CE, so as to include usage at the time when the Septuagint was translated. But realistically speaking, it probably makes no difference at all to the usage of parthenos, or if it does matter a hair either way the references we have won't be that specific. Wesley
I had added the definitions from the "modern" Greek dictionary myself. Actualy "parthenos" is still in use in Greek language today but the Papyrus dictionary is a 61-volume-one that studies Greek language from antiquity till today. The uses of the word I listed are the ones that came to use before the Middle Ages. Most of them are out of use by now so they do not depict current use of the word . In Modern Greek it has been replaced by the word "parthena". User: Dimadick
I have quoted from several well respected translations to show that many Christians concede that the Hebrew in Isaiah 7:14 means "young woman" rather than "virgin".  I do not think it is accurate to say that the dispute about the meaning of the word is between the Christians on one side and the Jews and the Skeptics on the other.  Michael Glass
----
From the page
:The Mishnah and the Tosefta use the word bethulah to refer to a young woman who has not yet menstruated (even though she may have had sexual intercourse).
does someone have a source for this?  Orthodox Jews use a marriage document that obligates the husband to provide for his wife and stipulates that she receive a divorce settlement should the marriage end in divorce.  In that document the woman is described as a betulah...meaning virgin, certainly not meaning not yet menstruated.  OneVoice 19:43, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Topics of note in Atlas Shrugged

message: An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Topics_of_note_in_Atlas_Shrugged article:
* Can link circular motion: ...back represents the heavens, which, because of the apparent circular motion of the planets around the earth, were conceived of as being... (link to section)
* Can link San Sebastian: ...ts the various buildings constructed for the workers of the San Sebastian Mines, and notes how they are all poorly built and can be e... (link to section)
* Can link Federal Republic: ... don't call Canada "The Dominion of Canada" or Germany "The Federal Republic of Germany"—so by having her characters do this Rand ... (link to section)
* Can link John Galt: ...s and the villains of Atlas Shrugged. Among the heroes, John Galt and Hank Rearden are from working class backgrounds, while ... (link to section)
* Can link working class: ...ed. Among the heroes, John Galt and Hank Rearden are from working class backgrounds, while Dagny Taggart and Francisco d'Anconia ar... (link to section)
Notes: The article text has not been changed in any way; Some of these suggestions may be wrong, some may be right.
Feedback: I like it, I hate it, Please don't link to — LinkBot 11:25, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest 5 possible wiki links for [[Topics of note in Atlas Shrugged]].
Talk:Hebrew Bible (term)

message: This page is now a redirect to Tanakh per a merge discussion.
Should this page redirect to:
:A) The article Tanakh as a whole.
:B) The section Tanakh#Hebrew Bible.
power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect sub-target 
Talk:Churchill College, Cambridge

message: The information on CCFC needs to be modified. They are now the first team to retain the Division 1 title as Downing have now achieved the same feat.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Animalhaz (talk • contribs) 11:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Churchill College Football CLub 
Talk:Baltic Sea

message: I have checked the current pages about Baltic Sea, and there is little about the environmental status and about health issues related to Baltic Sea (especially swimming and fish eating). I know several people who are experts on this, and I suggest that we take an international collaborative effort to improve the current situation. The people I know could edit Wikipedias in English, Swedish, and Finnish. All the listed pages should be mentioned on the main article about the Baltic Sea on each language. ping: User:Giantflightlessbirds, :sv:User:Josefina Algotsson --Jtuom (talk) 07:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: After visiting the Baltic Sea Science Center (they do not have a Swedish name) I offered to meet with them while I was still in Stockholm and develop a Wikipedia/Commons/Wikidata strategy. Unfortunately, they haven't replied, and I don't have a contact email address or phone number for the curators or director (all contact information is for Skansen as a whole). I suggest partnering with them and their expertise and publications list to improve these articles. I created an English article for the Baltic Sea Science Center based entirely on Swedish sources, and will nominate it for Did You Know? in the next day or so. But they could contribute so many photos and videos, and help improve the articles on numerous Baltic species, especially Baltic herring – science communcation is literally their job. I would also suggest that we concentrate on improving the Biology section in the main article(s) first, adding well-referenced sections on water quality and pollutants that cite numerous recent studies. These could then be spun off as longer independent articles. Finally, I suggest we improve the main Baltic Sea article (at least, the Biology section) in Danish, Russian, Polish, Latvian, Lithuanian, Estonian, and German as well as Swedish and Finnish (who have I missed?), as having at least that basic information available to those language communities would make a big differences. Anyway, these are my thoughts as a visitor from New Zealand! —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 09:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion of new pages about Baltic Sea 
Talk:List of people from New York (state)

message: this page is missing dee snider .-. 64.90.240.38 (talk)
yeah, I agree. 98.15.216.208 (talk) 21:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dee snider 
Talk:Paracetamol

message: To read this article, one would think that paracetamol is useless. Poor article. 2A00:23C8:9FF6:DC01:2147:38EA:4881:5694 (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor article basically saying paracetamol is useless... 

message: I noted the PARACETAMOL - descriptor - minor comment - I am sure TYLENOL is the far bigger brand name - and I'm a Brit.
Agree with others - given how much paracetamol/tylenol is in use - the article almost seems dismissive. BeingObjective (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A Brit living in the USA... 2A02:C7C:DA9E:C00:7D5E:3D8C:A61C:E1C4 (talk) 08:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article likely should be redone. 

message: Page currently refers to Paracetamol's Scheduling in Australia as "Rx Only" Since this is not a term used by the TGA to describe drug Scheduling, I believe it should be changed to say S4/S3/S2/Unscheduled. Kalebz456 (talk) 05:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Drug Scheduling
Talk:Black Watch

message: I'll add stuff here as I run across it:
*  – Collection of newspaper clippings and other ephemera mainly pertaining to the Black Watch. Other volumes might be online; I'm not sure. Yep, here's another one:
* 
 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  15:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources 

message: Wondering what this designation should be explained as in the parentheses, since it currently isn't. I did an unfruitful Google search just now. Is it a codename? Seasider53 (talk) 11:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 3 SCOTS is the Royal Regiment of Scotland Battlion short designation, (Long: The Black Watch, 3rd Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland, 3 SCOTS for short.) 78.145.63.92 (talk) 13:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 SCOTS
Talk:Convection cell

message: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not: You might want to check this. -- John Owens 16:49 May 13, 2003 (UTC)
Links about the Sun moved from main page. Should probably go on a page about the Sun.
*On the photosphere
*from NASA
*Web site on the Sun
*from Berkeley picture of sun's surface
*Image from Chabotspace
*Cutaway view of the Sun
DJ Clayworth 21:44, 2 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Benjamin Franklin

message: Lead should ideally have <= 4 paragraphs per MOS:LEAD. There are of course exceptions, but there's currently 7 paragraphs, and some of them could potentially be merged. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: E.g. the second and third could potentially be merged, as with the fourth and fifth. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Chesapeake and Ohio Canal

message: Article seems to be getting on the long side, I'd put the National park stuff back on the other page. Actually, I had intended to put some of the more National Park History stuff after 1932 on the other page, but just hadn't bothered doing so. Bonnachoven (talk) 20:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move more of the National Park stuff to National Park page? 

message: Looks like NPS is moving their historical documents around on their server. This makes for some broken links, even on the NPS site. We'll see when everything calms down, and maybe fix any broken links. Also some of the brochures for the canal have been updated on the choh pages. Ll1324 (talk) 21:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPS site maintenance 

message: It would be useful to have a Category for the C&O Canal (or for C&O Canal NHP). In addition to the main articles on the canal and the park, there are now several articles about components and related features:
*Aqueduct Bridge (Potomac River)
*Aqueducts on the C&O Canal
*Canal Place
*Locks on the C&O Canal
*Monocacy Aqueduct
*Paw Paw Tunnel
*Seneca Aqueduct
*Tidewater Lock.
If there is no objection, I will create the category. Moreau1 (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it! Ll1324 (talk) 16:52, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Some of the categories formerly associated with this article are more appropriate for the C&O NHP article, so they will be added there. Moreau1 (talk) 23:00, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  C&O Canal Category 

message: According to the table on Insurrection Act of 1807, President Jackson invoked the Act at Maryland's request to deal with a labor dispute with canal workers in Williamsport. Sound like there's a bigger story here; can anyone find out what happened? -- Beland (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insurrection Act 

message: A POV-inline tag was recently added and subsequently reverted.  I fail to understand what POV is being pushed.  Is there a reliable source that says the width was inappropriate?  Toddst1 (talk) 23:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV?