lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:X-Men II: The Fall of the Mutants

message: When I made my article on X-Men 2: Fall of the Mutants, I didn't know that there was an article about the same game (just a different name). Should we merge the two? NeoCoronis 22:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:X-Men: Children of the Atom (video game)

message: :Image:X-Men Children of the Atom screenshot.png
Shouldn't be left orphaned. Can't think of any usage as of yet, though. elias.hc 04:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned image 

message: *This is full of POV language like "Cyclops is the closest thing to a shoto", "Iceman... is Cyclops' worst nightmare", and "Spiral is a great grappler"... etc. etc.  This needs to rewritten to have a more objective slant, because it reads like a half-baked strategy guide right now. Danny Lilithborne 23:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hacked out the strategy parts and reduced it to the hard facts. I feel that a bare-bone description of the powers and a description of their stages is ok. Onomatopoeia 11:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character profiles 

message: Was this engine used for the Alpha games or something? Obviously it's not the SSF2 Turbo Engine. And the same engine was used for the sequels like Marvel Superheroes, X-Men vs. Streetfighter right?
*It's not the Alpha engine at all.  It was a new kind of engine that was massively streamlined (and IMHO, completely redone, although I don't have a source for this) for MSH. Danny Lilithborne 02:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine?
Talk:Googlezon

message: I have closed the merger discussion, and moved it to Talk:EPIC 2014/Archive 1. Consensus was not reached, though I think it's really difficult to determine since the discussion technically remained open for like two years or so,... Dr. Cash (talk) 22:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "The term has since gained a life of its own" is talking up the term Googlezon giving it more importance than it deserves. The Googlezon article is very short. Googlezon is what should be listed on the EPIC 2014 as cultural impact. The EPIC 2014 could do with cleanup too, the timeline is practically a list only it doesn't have bullet points in front of each item and could be rephrased into better prose style. Having said that there are plenty of other things I could improve and I can leave you to it if you are interested in working on it.  -- Horkana (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Created a Cultural Impact section for the EPIC 2014, was a lot less to do than I had expected or even hoped. The Googlezon article overlaps very heavily with EPIC 2014 and I still think a merge is appropriate, but I will leave it a while longer in case there is anything I've missed but I think all that is needed is to turn this page into a redirect. -- Horkana (talk) 21:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Found this page while looking for the correct spelling of the term for a discussion some friends and I were having. Seems to me that a redirect would be appropriate. Lot 49atalk 16:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

text: I think the best thing to do is to merge & redirect, though I'm not sure if a 'cultural impact' section even in EPIC 2014 for "googlezon" is appropriate. The term doesn't appear to have really caught on much -- though it tried -- see google trends data. Compare that data to other popular neologisms, like 'octomom' or 'rickroll', and it's just hardly worth mentioning. Though, I guess if you want, keep it as a minor subsection in EPIC 2014 -- but it's true "cultural impact" is very, very little. Dr. Cash (talk) 16:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Charlotte Cooper (musician)

message: Whoa, what's up with that paragraph about her 'boyfriend'.  I quote...'This ended speculation of her engagement to Subways frontman Billy Lunn'.  For god's sake, when was there speculation?  She's wearing an engagement ring, he said during a concert they were engaged...When I saw them someone yelled 'Marry me, Billy Lunn' and she said something along the lines of 'he can't', i.e. he's taken.  I am going to remove this paragraph.  If someone can produce evidence that yes, they are no longer engaged and she is now dating James Wood, then it can be put back.  Starla Dear 16:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Boyfriend???
Talk:X: Beyond the Frontier

message: Hi, I was just working through expanding and referencing the section on X-Tension. I can't find any sources on X-Tension being criticised for a bad manual. Even by actively googling "X-Tension bad manual"/"X-Gold bad manual". Literally nothing. Plenty on X-BTF's bad manual, but nothing on X-T. So I'm deleting that bit for now, though if anyone can source it, feel free to put it back in.The Zig (talk) 13:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: X-Tension - bad manual? 

message: IGN give a great interview with Bernd Lehahn, which I've put in as a source on some info for X-Tension. Annoyingly, they've mispelled his name as Lahahn, and put him as "lead designer". For the spelling on his name, and his job title, I've gone with the information on the Egosoft's website, which also agrees with the info given in X-Tension's manual (both are linked in the article). Hope that makes sense.The Zig (talk) 13:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bernd Lahahn - Lead Designer vs. Bernd Lehahn - Egosoft's Director

message: Hi all. We seem to have the start of a little editing war with the following sentence.
"The player is given a ship, some credits, and left to make his/their own way in the X Universe."
I believe it should be 'their' as the sentence is regarding the player who is an indefinite gender; male or female. The only time where 'his' makes sense is if we change player to Kyle Brennan; which does not really work.
I will change the sentence back to the grammatically correct 'their' for now.Xenon_Slayer (talk) 11:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: His Vs. Their - Edit War
Talk:X2: Wolverine's Revenge

message: I'm going to be blunt: The summary reads like something that was thrown together in a real hurry by a person minimally skilled in the written English language. It is in dire need of quality control both in basic structure as well as in grammar and it's pervading lack of clarity. I'm trying to be as neutral as possible, but I just don't see how any of you could let such a horrible addition stand. I'd fix it myself, but it's been years since I played the game. Just throwing that out there.  
The Fury 21:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Plot Summary 

message: I added the section and one score from a reliable source, and encourage others to be found.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tryzon (talk • contribs) 15:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception
Talk:Catherine Marshall

message: you  may want to add that julie was mainly based on catherins own life. i suggest that more info be added on her books and how they have been turned into movies plays and shows  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.229.36.253 (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  julie 

message: I removed the image that was in the article because the date of the image does not seem to indicate that it could be her since she would have been 8 years old in 1922 (if her birth date is accurate in the article). FloNight♥♥♥♥ 22:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image removed

message: Don't have time to edit right now, but for my future use: 
*West Virginia Encyclopedia
*Institute for the Study of American Evangelicals
*West Virginia Wesleyan College
*The Presbyterian Outlook
*Historic Tour of Johnson City
-- Foetusized (talk) 18:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for future use
Talk:Front-mid-engine, front-wheel-drive layout

message: Unless I'm missing something, I don't think the ford Model T image should be included here, as it is rear wheel drive. I'll delete it in a few days. --DoktorRocket 16:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model T image 

message: I think this article should be marked for deletion, or merged into the FMR layout. It's the same thing.--User:MacMan2626 07:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge or delete 

message: I'm removing the Honda vehicles from the article, as they're over halfway forward of the front axle centerline. The differential goes under the oilpan, but that's only at the rear of the engine. --Bhtooefr (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honda vehicles
Talk:XGRA: Extreme-G Racing Association

message: I don't know about you fans but this page lacks of content... I have both XGRA and XG3 and know much about it. I could work on this and add more. What do you think? --mektroid 14:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of content 

message: In the tracks section, there is no mention or the tracks on Mars. The two tracks that are missing are Araxes Arabian Ridge and Hellos Ridge. I do not know yet the length of the tracks etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gigagamer (talk • contribs) 01:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of details required
Talk:Julian Bond

message: If the transcript of his speech shows he never said that, then the blog either lied or was misinformed.  I feel as though the heading "Controversial Statements" is inappropriate.  If he never said it, it should be "Misattributed Comments" or something, and the section should more forcibily note that he didn't say it, if he didn't.--ZachPruckowski 17:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely not. It was a skit on a comedy show. (Note also that Julian Bond is light-skinned,  Garrett Morris darker-skinned.)  Patrickbowman 10:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Controversial Statements"

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 

message: The bio box at the top has Bond's second marriage starting in 1991, but the Personal Life section of the text has it starting in 1990.  Not a big discrepancy, maybe, but at least one entry has to be wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.208.6 (talk) 08:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second marriage 

message: He was also a writer of political and historical-political books as well as being a poet (I read his poetry before I knew anything about his politics). 37.99.83.197 (talk) 11:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you think anyone should add to the Wikipedia article to better reflect this? Is there any source you recommend to cite?  Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poet and writer 

message: I just added a link in the external link section to this person's archives at the University of Virginia.
*Papers of Julian Bond
I wanted to note this here for these reasons:
*I think that Wikipedia articles should link to archives, which I think fit with Wikipedia:External_links#What_can_normally_be_linked
*I work at the University of Virginia, and the archives I linked are at my institution
*I am considering whether I should make a general recommendation if and how libraries should make an effort to connect their archives to Wikipedia
In general Wikipedia has a difficult relationship with organizations promoting their content. Linking of archives is not behavior which has been problematic in the past, and to me, it seems useful, but I thought to note what I did here as an example for discussion.
I am wondering what could go right or wrong if more universities linked archives to Wikipedia, and the extent to which this is useful activity. If anyone has thoughts then share.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to archives 

message: Please revise. 2600:1008:B042:8323:88C:61FF:FE4E:FF5E (talk) 20:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone has called Bond racist in this article
Talk:Conclusive presumption

message: I think this article may be miscategorized.  Aren't there also irrebuttable presumptions in the U.S. and other jurisdictions? — MSchmahl… 17:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:English law]]

message: This article should at least be consolidated with Rebuttable presumption, presumption of innocence, and Presumption of fact, for a new Presumption (law) article that can also explore the full range of kinds of presumption, such as presumption of constitutionality or unconstitutionality, presumption of nonauthority, etc.--Jon Roland 03:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal: Consolidate with other articles

message: There isn't any such thing as a conclusive presumption. A presumption by definition can be rebutted. When you presume something, you are open to evidence as to the existence of a contrary conclusion. In contrast, the 'presumptions' referred to on this page are in fact rules of law, where the result is deemed to be the case. Arpitt (talk) 14:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is rubbish

message: In Northern Ireland, the rebuttable presumption that a child is doli incapax was abolished by article 3 of the the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 1998 (No. 2839 (N.I. 20)). (I mention this since doli incapax links here. James500 (talk) 11:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doli incapax: Northern Ireland
Talk:Burlington Catholic Central High School

message: I've suggested this page should be semi-protected, as it has been on the receiving end of a lot of vandalism from a number of addresses (probably all school ones).Average Earthman 02:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection 

message: Hatchetized the OR, some of which conflicted with the school's site.  This is now a simple stub, flagged as a stub for the state and the religious school type, and ready for interested editors to expand.sinneed (talk) 02:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cope Edit: Stubbed

message: As a student of CC, I assure you that the Dean and Athletic director changes are correct. The CC website (cchsnet.org) has the same information, so the information is correct, just not properly cited.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.148.108 (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Staff 

message: Just passing through here and I wanted to suggest listing different things at the school which can be included such as sports, arts, academic achievements, and other school-related information. I will add some more when I have time to do some research. :) Red Maple Leaves (talk) 05:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for improvement
Talk:Lí Ban

message: Any objection to moving this page to Lí Ban? (That's the only spelling I've seen very often...) QuartierLatin1968  17:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The old Dab page improperly linked to Mermaid#British_Isles, which is unacceptable bcz there's a section devoted to her at Lí Ban#Christian mermaid; it there is info particular to her in that section that people looking for her by name should have, then
: if it's worth maintaining 2 copies of it, put a copy on Lí Ban;
: if it's not, then move it to Lí Ban, remove from Mermaid, and let those who need that info follow the link to Lí Ban#Christian mermaid to find it.
--Jerzy•t 12:27, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Access to Irish-mermaid info 

message: 2 different figres on page currently, which need to be "content split" into 2 articles as per Wikipedia is not a dictionary policy.</br>
I plan to relocate the mermaid content to a Lí Ban (mermaid) page, as per WP:PROSPLIT. --Kiyoweap (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting mermaid
Talk:Jorgen Von Strangle

message: One contributor to the Nickdisk board suggested a resemblance between Jorgen and Apogee Software's Duke Nukem (character). knoodelhed 17:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible influences

message: I deleted the line about Binky being Jorgen's godchild because what the frick?
Noclevername 23:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletions

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_trivia_sections
That is all, thanks for your time.
Lots42 00:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On The Topic Of Trivia
Talk:Paul Bowles

message: Hello, I am not a wikipedia editor and was just reading about authors, but noticed some very poorly formatted information focused on Bowles's alleged racism in the introduction section of this article. I attempted to revert to the last neutral version of the article and the editor rebuffed this change. I do not care whether the information is included in the article either way, but it certainly needs to be correctly formatted and probably in its own section. It also needs academic sources. I would strongly prefer a seasoned wikipedian take over this issue, as I do not know the norms here but am disturbed by such edits going unremarked on. 
Sincerely 76.14.54.85 (talk) 06:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this to attention. I've removed the offending text for now. At the very least, these sorts of matters should be canvassed within the body of the article, and a summary thereof might qualify for mention in the lede. But they should not be mentioned solely in the lede. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 07:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Bowles didn't even say the things the anon is alleging - if you read the New York Review piece linked, you'll see that was a combination of Truman Capote and William Burroughs. Anyway I removed it again and blocked the anon for edit warring. It's completely inappropriate to have shouty outrage, sloppily sourced, in the lede - or anywhere else. Antandrus (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-neutral and Poorly Formatted Info in Introduction
Talk:Therianthropy in popular culture

message: If this article is supposed to be about therianthropy in popular culture, then it shouldn't have a D&D-specific stub.  (The categories are iffy.)  Therianthropy and popular culture are not limited to D&D.  If the intent was to make this a D&D article, it should have been named "Therianthropy (Dungeons & Dragons)" in the first place.  Coyoty 17:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Charles Ng

message: I think that the article should mention that the extradition battle was mainly over Canadian objections to capital punishment.  I think that they have some policy where they are very hesitant if not unwilling to extradite anyone who is facing a crime punishable by capital punishment. RandomGuy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.105.151 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 28 July 2006‎
Yeah... funny how they let Ng go and extradited him with the quickness! It's a given that Canada has pansy laws against extraditing for capital punishment.  Eek328 (talk) 21:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: 1985 to 1991, I guess in some quarters that would be called "with the quickness." Six years seems like a fairly long time to me. 116.231.75.71 (talk) 11:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Your timing seems to be seriously off wrong. The article explicitly says he had to serve his Canadian sentence, I assume the whole four and a half years, before extradition proceedings could begin. He was arrested in July 1985, I assume time served was taken into account so we can consider his sentence begins from this date, meaning he was due for release in February 1990. The Reference Re Ng Extradition judgement was in September 1991 I think with extradition soon after. So it was about 1 year and 7 months between extradition proceedings beginning (I guess they began very soon after release) and his extradition. This is a relatively quick time for most countries with a well developed legal system. I mean despite having all the time while he served his sentence and then awaited extradition, they still took 6-7 years (our article says 6 but it seems more likely it was 7 or very close to it) to put him on trial in the US. Then the trial took ~4 months to reach a verdict. Actually, about 2 years after he was convicted, which was about 9.5 years after his extradition judgement, the United States v Burns decision was delivered which effectively means that it's unlikely Charles Ng would have been extradited from that point forward if the prosecutors didn't give assurances not to seek the death penalty. Nil Einne (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Extradition
Talk:Ekaterini Thanou

message: It is not at all clear that Thanou will be awarded Marion Jones' gold medal.  The IOC can refuse to issue a gold medal.  This is a real possibility given Thanou's doping conviction. Please see link below.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,22559550-23218,00.html
14:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal to be reassigned, or to be vacated? 

message: Sounds as if she is on the list of Olympians for Greece for the 2008 Olympics. Rauterkus (talk) 01:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 Olympian
Talk:Settlement history of Cape Breton Island

message: This page is essentially an excerpt from the "history" section of the main Cape Breton Island article.  There's no need to repeat the same thing in two places.  This separate page should be eliminated, or else a very abbreviated form of it should be in the Cape Breton Island history section, with a link like "Main article - ..." for more detail. Dsreyn 17:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Repeat of main Cape Breton Island history section
Talk:Bell's spaceship paradox/Archive 3

message: The second paragraph under "Bell's thought experiment" asks if the string breaks, but the description of the setup doesn't mention a string.  It's not until the fourth paragraph that we see a varient wherein a connecting string is mentioned.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaunm (talk • contribs) 
:Good catch; thanks, I just fixed this.  During the rewrite I somehow dropped mention of the string.  BTW, look above for the "four tilde" trick for signing talk page comments.---CH 16:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What string? 

message: The article now has a section called "Bell observers" to indicate the moving observers in this example. Who coined that term? 
Bell stressed that: 
[the example's] special merit is to drive home the lesson that the laws of physics in any one reference frame account for all physical phenomena, including the observations of moving observers. And it is often simpler to work in a single frame, rather than to hurry after each moving object in turn.
To me "Bell observer" suggests the contrary of what he tried to make clear. IMO, "moving observer" would be an appropriate lable.
Harald88 09:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bell observers"? 

message: Rod, please stop. If (a) this article is your only interest in Wikipedia and if (b) you can't get it, that there are no open questions in BSP, you are out of place here. --Pjacobi 15:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO the biggest question is if we can accept the AAPPs bulletin as Wikipedia source. Moreover, it would be nice if we can find a source for at least part of CH's calculations. Harald88 00:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop
Talk:Princess Victoria Adelaide of Schleswig-Holstein

message: Victoria Adelaide was the consort of a sovereign. Should she not be at Victoria Adelaide of Schleswig-Holstein? Charles 18:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I believe so, there's nothing to suggest there's an exception. I've moved it; feel free to move it back if I'm wrong. However, consorts of sovereigns drop the style "Princess" from their name, for example "Alexandra of Denmark" and "Princess Alexandra of Denmark" etc. PeterSymonds | talk 17:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consort