Talk:Meridian (astronomy)

message: In astrology there are two other definitions of meridian:
1. Meridian - any circle passing through north and south points of horizon. 
2. Meridian - any circle perpendicular to local horizon.
Such defined 'meridian' circles cut astronomy meridian circles. 
83.24.254.181 18:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I get what the local meridian is, but since the celestial meridian is a feature of the celestial sphere, is saying it will pass through the zenith a true statement for any location on Earth? It seems like that would only occur at the equator. (Look at what would happen at the poles.) — Elliot Winkler 05:24, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Passing through the zenith

message: I came to this article to find out what types of meridian there are in astronomy and I am still confused, despite having a good understanding and ability to use right ascension and declination and plenty of experience doing so as an amateur astronomer.
The various definitions of and types "meridian" need to be carefully distinguished, preferably by means of clear diagrams.
I copied this paragraph from the article. It seems to contradict the definition of meridian given. If a celestial object viewed from England, and it crosses the line joining the north celestial pole and the horizon, ie passes "under" the NCP, it will reach it's LOWEST point as it crosses the meridian.
"Because the meridian is fixed to the local horizon, a celestial object will appear to drift past the local meridian as the Earth spins. It reaches its highest point in the sky when crossing the meridian (culmination). Using an object's right ascension and the local sidereal time it is possible to determine the time of its culmination (see hour angle)."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Matthew Dalton (talk • contribs) 02:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is confusing and contains at least one error, can someone please fix these problems. 

message: Does anyone know of usage of 'remote meridian' as the opposite of local meridian?
209.101.142.66 (talk) 19:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  local meridian and the remote meridian 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose The two are not the same thing. In planetary astronomy, a central meridian is the planet's longitude which happens to lie at the center of the observable disk. In other words, it is the longitude which is pointed at the Earth. A meridian for an Earth-bound observer is just the plane through the north and south poles, and the north and south point of the horizon. It does not move relative to the observer. Tfr000 (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that I understand the difference, but you've convinced me that you know what you're talking about. If nobody has a different understanding of the two concepts that supports a merge, then this proposal can be removed. Ivanvector (talk) 05:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Central meridian. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 05:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central meridian listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]