Talk:Mark Kellogg (reporter)

message: One thing - the article needs infobox and persondata - See Biography infoboxes and WP:PERSONDATA. RHB Talk - Edits 23:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If someone wants to work up that box, I'm ok with it. However, I personally hate those infoboxes and have no desire to create one myself. Best,--Alabamaboy 14:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox and persondata 

message: Nothing much to say... well-writed, adequetely sources, and seems to fully cover the subject without going into unnecessary detail. A fine article. --JerryOrr 01:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passed as Good Article 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: The refs are a bit of a mess. Barnard's book has no page numbers. There is no need to repeat Hatch, pp. 203-4 in full four times. Since there is a list of sources, short refs might have been used just as easily. The naked URLs should be substituted with titles instead.
:::::These issues have been corrected.--SouthernNights (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: These issues have been corrected.--SouthernNights (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

text: The article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Good job! Lampman (talk) 20:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA sweeps 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mark Kellogg (reporter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110729010041/http://ap.org/pages/about/history/history_first.html to http://www.ap.org/pages/about/history/history_first.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061107023952/http://www.johnconnollybooks.com/journalism_photos.html to http://www.johnconnollybooks.com/journalism_photos.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720154018/http://www.wyomingtalesandtrails.com/custer4a.html to http://www.wyomingtalesandtrails.com/custer4a.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified