lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sverige-class coastal defence ship

message: I moved this article from Sverige Class Armored Cruiser to Sverige class cruiser. This in accord with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships). --Laisak 16:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Im actually not sure what to label this ship as, in swedish its a pansarskepp. --Dahlis 18:57, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and I moved the article to Sverige class coastal defence ships, as they are not battleships or cruisers per definition. The correctly translated term would be armoured ship, but since this means something entirely different in English maritimes terminology, the term "coastal defence ship" is closest to the truth. --MoRsE 12:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: Why in the world are the Swedish ships on wikipedia prefixed with HMS? As far as I know that prefix is reserved for Royal Navy vessels. Shouldn't the correct term be HSMS?
Manxruler 17:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article His Majesty's Ship gives an answer why. MoRsE 12:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The British sometimes uses the term HswMS about Swedish men of war but it's illogical for Sweden to do so it's not like we have ships loyial to the British Queen Darkwand (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HMS?

message: Surely they are sufficiently large (122 metres) and well-armed (4 x 28 cm) to be considered to be battleships? Sorry I don't have the exact page number, but they are listed in Anthony Preston's "Battleships of World War I". 188.221.129.72 (talk) 10:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They seem to often be called "Coastal Battleships" (Conway's) or "Coastal Defence Battleship" (Jane's) although they seem to have officially been designated Pansarskepp by the Swedish Navy, which the 1934 Jane's translates as Ironclads. Overall size doesn't seem to be that definative as at 7125 t standard, they were lighter than most Heavy cruisers or Armoured cruisers.Nigel Ish (talk) 00:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battleship? 

message: Infobox image changed to vintage drawing of Sverige 1912-1914, maybe not best image. "Brassey's" plan moved next to "Specifications" (sort of). Image of "firing" moved next to "armament" (sort of). Gallery under "Apperance" shows typical appearance before reconstruction, individual ships after. ReTeam (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Starting to change numbers to "metric source(conv to English)" when possible. No displacement changes. Objections? ReTeam (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  14 Dec 2015 and more

message: Hello all, I finally got around to adding the planned refit to Drottning Victoria from the mid 40s. The primary documents for this edit are found in the references and are viewable via Google Drive due to a research trip from 2015. Awhalen0601 (talk) 03:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  8 March 2022 update
Talk:Collider

message: This article needs a couple of special relativity formulae as a rationale of colliders MvR 17:22, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is massively incomplete, it's barely even a stub. The history of colliders in the article stops at 1971! There's no mention of, well, just about everything: the particles which are accelerated, tracking, focussing, energy, speed, luminosity, bunching, detectors, magnets, cryogenics, injection, data output, discoveries, disasters, B factories, HERA, DESY, Belle II, BaBar, KEK as an international testbed for new hardware, LEP versions, The Tevatron and its two detectors, the LHC and its four detectors, future colliders CLIC, ILC, Muon accelerator (including Neutrino Factory), the difference between a collider and a synchrotron. For starters.
In addition there needs to be a category "Colliders". And where's the link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accelerators_in_particle_physics#Colliders ?
Mollwollfumble (talk) 11:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massively incomplete 
Talk:Small, sealed, transportable, autonomous reactor

message: Note that the image from the LLNL article could be placed in this article, as S&TR is a government publication. 216.164.138.57 17:24, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried it. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 17:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: The first New Scientist article says "Alerts will be sent over secure satellite radio channels to the DoE or to an international agency overseeing the reactors."  Of course, this presumes the US is the manufacturer. Simesa 08:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'or to an international agency overseeing the reactors.'216.96.233.118 (talk) 14:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Controlling agency

message: I just had a little edit-war fight squabble :) with Simesa over how to express the unlikelihood of any country buying this. I have tried to keep it encyclopedic this time. But what I would really like to point out is that the whole idea is ludicrous (instead I now leave it to the readers' imagination to figure that out). Who would buy this? Why would a country want to buy a plant that can be remotely shut down by another country? (it would have to be done from another country, because they're obviously not going to do it themselves) There would have to be considerable advantages to buying it, but none of those are mentioned in the article. DirkvdM 05:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's obviously a non-proliferation idea targeted at the Third World nations and at Second World nations who want nuclear power "with no strings".  I can see SSTAR on large Pacific islands or near the cities in Africa.  Of course, no mention was made of what to do with the waste from the spent fuel - it obviously would be reprocessed, but there would still be some high-level waste.  The leasing nation certainly wouldn't want to keep the waste, so would the manufacturing nation?  It's a problem for a decade from now. Simesa 18:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was an accepted principal of GNEP that the leasing nation would keep the waste, which is a big source of criticism of the plan. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 17:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The lede for IFNEC/GNEP states that fuel supplier nations will take back spent fuel.216.96.233.118 (talk) 14:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who would buy this? 

message: Information provided in the article is outdated and (now) incorrect. SSTAR now means Small Secure Transportable Autonomous Reactor, and together with STAR-LM and STAR-H2 forms STAR reactors group. Due to this split into three reactors from SSTAR described in the article, parameters of the current SSTAR are different (for example electric power is 20 MW). One can verify this information in IAEA document IAEA-TECDOC-1536 (available online) (for a quick reference - subsection 6.6.6., paragraph under title "Lead cooled small reactors").  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.222.228.65 (talk) 15:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information
Talk:Eddie Giacomin

message: Wow ... this article is a positive mess, and a player like Giacomin deserves better.  I'll try to find time to spruce it up myself, but with the holidays ...  Ravenswing 23:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There, I managed it myself between making gingerbread cookies (no lie!).  The one thing I'd like to see is that reference placed in proper format or else cut.  Ravenswing 03:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Then add it in.  Keep in mind, any edit would need to be NPOV and fairly short (no more than a sentence), since to this point all that can be found is the one incident.  I can remember a baseball thrown by a drunk fan from last year narrowly missing Jacque Jones.  There is no mention of the incident on his page, yet it probably deserves a small mention.  Figure out a way it can be worked in.  Patken4 22:11, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Yet this is still an event that only justifies a maximum of one sentence.  If you want add a sentence in on it, do it.  As I have said, lots of other athletes and coaches have been attacked by fans.  Chad Kreuter had his hat stolen from him while he sat in the bullpen of Wrigley Field, Mike Curtis tackled a fan while he ran on the field, Tom Gamboa was physically attacked by fans, Al Arbour was showered with debris, Randy Myers was attacked by a fan on the mound after giving up a home run, etc.  There are simply many incidents where fans have attacked players on the field of play.  Giacomin's experience is certainly not the worst to have happened by a long shot.  Perhaps this incident would be best placed at List of violent spectator incidents in sports.  Patken4 23:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I quite agree.  We don't need to read squat here (although the bio of a prominent goalie such as Giacomin's worth reading in its own right), because we're not disputing that the incident happened, however much the various commentators disagree on the details.  We disagree on the notability of the incident.  In a 200+ page biography, there's plenty of room to dwell on an incident like this.  This article doesn't have (nor shouldn't have) 200 sentences.  What about this incident is particularly noteworthy, so much so that it was worth a full third of the space of the article of a Hall of Fame goaltender who had a twenty year long professional career?  Ravenswing 22:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding cleanup tag
Talk:Hindur

message: This redirect was created from a list of missing 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica articles.  I believe Hindur, Nalagarh, and Nawalgarh refer to the same location, which in Wikipedia can be found in the article on Nawalgarh.  If this is mistaken, please fix and let me know.  Thank you. Paul 17:52, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Nalagarh

message: This redirect was created from a list of missing 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica articles.  I believe Hindur, Nalagarh, and Nawalgarh refer to the same location, which in Wikipedia can be found in the article on Nawalgarh.  If this is mistaken, please fix and let me know.  Thank you. Paul 17:52, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:West Bridgford

message: Infact although Rushcliffe itself is quite white (around 95%) it is a largely rural District, looking at wards in West Bridgford itself shows that the percentage of white people is lower than the England and Wales average. http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/AreaProfile1.do?tab=2
So there.  18:25, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Overwhelmingly White"? 

message: Bridgeford West, so called from its situation by the bridge over the Trent.
It is a pleasant and well built village and parish on the south side of the Trent, one and a half miles south by east of Nottingham. The lordship contains 258 inhabitants and 1,190 acres [4.8 km²] of land, all belonging to John C. Musters Esq. (a minor), except one estate of 57 acres [230,000 m²] which is the property of Mr Clifford C. Caunt.
The church is dedicated to St. Giles, and is a fine, ancient structure with tower and pinnacles, which appears to great advantage, peeping above the trees which surround it. The chancel was repaired at considerable expense in 1833. The tithes were commuted in 1840 for £262. The benefice is a rectory valued in the King's books at £16 4s 2d [£16.21], now at £388. J. Musters Esq. is the patron, and the Rev. Wm. Musters of Colwick is the rector, for whom the Rev. John Peatfield officiates.
The school here was built in 1802 by the Rev. Wm. Thompson, who endowed it with £902 stock for the education of ten poor children, seven from Bridgeford and three from Gamston. The master received £15 a year. Bridgeford also partakes of Dame Frances Pierrepont's charity.
:Moved from within the main article, needs to be rewritten with the various facts in the relevant sections.  Joe D (t) 04:43, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry from ''[[White's Directory of Nottinghamshire]], [[1853]]''
Talk:IBM Series/1

message: Marlagram (talk) 06:37, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some information - date and price 

message: I noticed this image in another section of the wiki. While it is not identified as such, the tall unit (and the screen/printer) is a business version of a Series/1 system
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:First_Automatic_Meter_Reading_and_Load_Management_System.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmicray (talk • contribs) 16:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You should like that to this main page. 143.232.210.38 (talk) 18:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  good image of a Series/1 

message: A quick Google search suggests it was CPIX  (developed by the University of Ohio, Cleveland and Rutgers University; and marketed by IBM's Telecommunications Group) and Microsoft XENIX. 99Electrons (talk) 04:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Unix? 

message: If Series /1 could run Xenix, surely it must have had other storage than the 8 inch floppie that can be identified. Xenix on floppies were about 30 something disks... So I guess there must have been a what they called at that time "winchester drive"... 134.247.251.245 (talk) 15:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storage, anyone? 

message: In the current version of the article I read this: "8-inch green monitor with 25 × 80 character resolution"; it seems quite strange, because in the usual way of indicating text mode displays resolution the figure related to the number of columns (i.e. 80) comes before the number of rows (25). So it should have been written 80 x 25.--Corrado72 (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Strange" indication for the text mode display resolution
Talk:Trevor Leota

message: (born 08/02/1975) 8th Feb or 2nd Aug? Rich Farmbrough 18:18, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

message: The data comes from London Wasps site and therefore it is a fairly safe bet that they wrote in British style. I've amended the article accordingly.GordyB 21:35, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Calexico Mission School

message: Here is an info box I made just for Seventh-day Adventist academies. Template:Infobox_Seventh-day_Adventist_Academies. You can see an example of it at Georgia-Cumberland Academy. In Jesus -- Anthony White 03:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Box
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Kdbuffalo

message: from: kdbuffalo, date 9/19/05  I just sent reconciliation letters to both the principle parties in the conflict.  Hopefully things improve.  
Second, I don't have any problem with the NPOV rule.  
I just see censorship over and over.
Wikipedia states the following regarding minority view articles: 
"None of this, however, is to say that minority views cannot receive as much attention as we can possibly give them on pages specifically devoted to those views. There is no size limit to Wikipedia. But even on such pages, though a view is spelled out possibly in great detail, we still make sure that the view is not represented as the truth." 
Now I have wanted to have cooperation and have good faith efforts on both sides.  I have listened to the other side and taken feedback. I made some changes although admittedly not a lot.  
However, Cooperation may never happen.  Why?
Here is why:
1.  Does some person keep changing the theological conservative Christianity  internal link in the Biblical scientific foreknowledge article so it goes to the Christian right (Falwell, etc).  Would a person who wants to act in good faith do that? 
2. Would people who act in good faith send harrassing messages ("fundie" etc).  
I think the people calling for cooperation yet saying absolutely nothing publically about the bad behavior of certain  anti-BSF parties are not seeking true cooperation.  What they are asking for is the minority view be trampled or whittled down in content despite the Wikipedia policy. 
ken 15:45, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: cooperation is asked for but is true cooperation asked for?
Talk:Whitney Young High School

message: --75.21.78.34 (talk) 21:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline --[[Special:Contributions/75.21.78.34|75.21.78.34]] ([[User talk:75.21.78.34|talk]]) 21:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)text 
Talk:W. B. Ray High School

message: Paul Reubens? The Snuggie lady? Can anyone verify these? This sounds like baloney.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.90.206.162 (talk) 03:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Reubens??? 

message: There is no Foy Miller High School. There is Roy Miller and Foy Moody. I'm changin it to Roy.-Giant89 17:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foy Miller??? 

message: I changed the Table at top to an Infobox... It looks a lot nicer, and keeps the same standard as most other secondary schools.-Dk69 20:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Table at top 

message: *I've gone through and re-worked or cleaned out most of the opinion based items.  Also removed several dead links. --Txkent 17:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up 
Talk:St. Andrew's College, Grahamstown

message: At present there is a discussion relating to the renaming of this category. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at this discussion page. Please note that the discussion is not a majority vote so contributions should be based on Wikipedia policies and independent sources. Cjc13 (talk) 13:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Old Andreans renaming 
Category talk:Jehovah's Witnesses people

message: Charles Taze Russell was not Jehovah's Witnesses, he was a Bible Student! --Bibelforscher 04:23, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Bible Students and Jehovah's Witnesses are the same religion. Although there are splinter groups of Jehovah's Witenesses who continue to use this name solely, all Jehovah's Witnessed consider the "Bible Students" as their former name.--Esprit15d 21:00, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

message: The title of this category is grammatically incorrect, akin to saying "Baptists people" or "Catholics people."  It should be changed to "Jehovah's Witness people."--Esprit15d 21:00, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Clamp (tool)

message: Wondering where the metal industries clamps are listed, I see medical.
I understand that most of the time they are called vices, but I am pretty sure their are Hydraulic and other mechanically actuated clamps specifically taliored for metal  trades. eg. Magnetic Clamps.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erlyrisa (talk • contribs) 15:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mechanical Clamps

message: I'm the original poster and strongly urge Cardellini clamp be merged herein (but I dunno how to do it). unsigned comment by Robertkeller 17:15, 27 June 2006
:Easy. You first copy the stuff over and then create a redirect to this article. In more detail:
::1. Go to Cardellini clamp, click on the edit tab & copy what you want.
::2. Come back to Clamp (tool), click on edit tab and paste it in the appropriate place. Save your changes.
::3. Go back to Cardellini clamp, open the edit window and replace the text with #REDIRECTClamp (tool)
:Redirects are cheap and there is no need to delete the original article. Now anyone looking for a Cardellini Clamp will be sent here. You might have got confused by the "Move" button at the top. That is not really used to move text, but to rename articles instead. HTH Luigizanasi 04:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cardellini clamp]] 

message: Toggling-type clamps find various uses in jigs and fixtures. Not knowledgeable enough here to write anything in the article, so I'll leave it as an open request. __Just plain Bill (talk) 22:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-Sta-Co type clamps deserve mention
Talk:Debenture

message: I want to know what is the difference between debentures and bonds.
If there is a difference What a company will choose bond or debenture and why? 2409:4063:409A:ECBA:61C1:B2DF:9965:9511 (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debentures and bonds 

message: What is meant by debentures??? 116.68.98.149 (talk) 11:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is meant by debentures
Talk:Corcovado National Park

message: I've just expanded the stub that was here. I've tried to be encyclopedic about it, but that was rather difficult. I've spent several months on nature tracks (if I add it all up), almost half of which in tropical rainforests. But in the four days I spent in this park I've just about doubled my number of animal sightings. I had run into peccaries before in the Peten in Guatemala, which I thought was one of my most impressive nature sightings (they're pretty dangerous if provoked) but here I ran into two big groups in just four days. Normally one can count oneself lucky to see one sizeable animal per day when going deep into a forest (I know - I've crossed Borneo and talked to many others with similar experiences) but here I ran into one animal after the other! One may get lucky, but four days in a row? This park is absolutely fantastic! There, now I've said what I couldn't in the article :) . 
By the way, I normally use bold type, capitalisation and exclamation marks very sparsely, but here I just couldn't help myself. DirkvdM 19:31, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: It's MARVELOUS! It's TERRIFIC!! Superlatives can not cover my feelings!

message: I think it's a lot easier to get to Corcovado via boat, you know if you're not into fording rivers and that kind of stuff. If someone feels like writing about that be my guest.
:You can also fly in, as the article states - there's a (grassy) airstrip at Estación Sirena. I haven't heard of boats going there, but it wouldn't surprise me. DirkvdM 09:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other ways to get to Corcovado 

message: The original text stated that the park "encompasses an area of 54,538 terrestrial hectares and 2,400 marine hectares". Bobblewik changed that to "a land area of 545.38 km² and a marine area of 24 km²" (which, I assume, is a calculation based on those figures). But I looked it up and two sources gave 41788 hectares and 42469 hectares. So I changed it to 420 km². Revert me if I'm wrong :) . DirkvdM 07:53, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: Hi guys, this entry is very informative, but most of it is about visiting the place, I would suggest moving most of the "Visiting" section to Wikivoyage and focus on the facts (species, climate, etc) here in Wikipedia. I already added a Sister link at the bottom. Suggestions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rquesada (talk • contribs) 18:16, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikivoyage
Talk:Ebony

message: The image with the label "Kamagong (Ebony) Chair" is a file with the name :File:Kamagong (Ironwood) Chair.jpg. So is it ironwood or ebony? The description says "Ebony - Ironwood". I'm not wood expert, but I thought they were different species not overlapping.--SPhilbrickT 15:24, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kamagong (Ebony) Chair 

message: Maybe we should include an "In Popular Culture" section. Ebony, in the Elder Scrolls series of video games, is a volcanic glass...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.200.253 (talk) 16:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Elder Scrolls? 

message: What's special about this wood that makes it black? 99.4.184.9 (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color? 

message: As I recall the great American company Gibson was found innocent and the wood was returned to them useless after years of improper storage 2600:1009:B147:F7B1:20A1:92E8:1431:6F22 (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction