lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Argentine people of Irish descent

message: Should it not be "Argentinians"? Peter Clarke 12:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't it be "Argentines"? --Mariano(t/c) 13:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I need a drink. 98.166.186.191 (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Sesamoiditis

message: Given that, if I'm not mistaken, this type of inflammation is fairly prevalent in humans and most sufferers would appreciate a human-centric article on the topic, should this article be split into to stubs? Specifically, should there be both a "Sesamoiditis" and "Equine Sesamoiditis" article instead of the current merged article? I haven't done enough editing on Wikipedia yet to trust my intuition on this one, but it seems like two articles would allow for more detail on each particular form of the disorder as well as allow for images of both a human and horse leg at the top right of their respective pages. Here's a nice article on the subject. Mathemajor (talk) 22:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split in Two? 

message: Really? Human sesamoids in the toe are the size of jelly beans? I find that very hard to believe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.249.69 (talk) 23:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jelly beans? 

message: Need more audit departmentsj 66.191.15.186 (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rfc's erratas and meta data
Talk:Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (musical)

message: Would anyone object if I renamed this article Chitty Chitty Bang Bang The name of the London production and the Broadway musical was "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang"  not "Chitty, the Musical". J. Van Meter 12:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

message: "The Broadway production closed on December 31, 2005 after 34 previews and 284 regular performances, losing its entire financial investment."
- I interpret this to mean that no money was made during the entire run. I added the citation note. Group29 15:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Losing investment

message: Is it within the guidelines to have excerpts of the soundtrack?  Would a 15 sec clip be ok for fair use?  I think it could add a lot to the article, which is otherwise a bit devoid of media.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wierdy1024 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack 

message: No information on what the story is about?  -- AvatarMN (talk) 10:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story 

message: It'd be nice to have some pictures, especially one of the car that supposedly cost 750,000 Pounds to build. Bizzybody (talk) 08:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures?
Talk:Louise of France

message: The picture with this caption is not Princess Louise of France, as was revealed by research of the Louvre. (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXCjt_TmkqE)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nederbelg (talk • contribs) 19:26, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Princess Louise of France in her religious habit, ca. 18th-century
Talk:Jeff Cotton

message: According to several fan pages and friends of Jeff, his wife died, not him:
http://www.zappateers.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=32137&sid=3dc78ad908c1c384d9be3ba71b45d037  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HexNash (talk • contribs) 18:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not dead
Talk:Witch (Navajo)

message: The article doesn't state clearly what is fact and what is myth: do some of these witches actually exist or is it only accusations of witchery that actually exist?41.219.31.166 (talk) 10:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Real thing?

message: Please don't anyone come (as someone did on the Skin-walker entry) and say "there's no such thing as a witch in Native America," and say that a Yee naaldlooshii was "called a Navajo witch by outsiders."  Really?  Because most of the Navajos I went to school with believe in witches, and they call them witches (when speaking English), and if you look at what they're talking about, it's, um, yeah, pretty much witches.  There's extensive literature on witch-beliefs among the Navajo, and witch is the only term for it.
Just in case someone does argue this same thing--just ask them why this little book was published by a community college run by the Navajo Nation.
::Blue, Martha. (1988). The witch purge of 1878: oral and documentary history in the early Navajo reservation years. Tsaile: Navajo Community College Press.
Yeah, and if they don't believe this is a real book just have 'em look it up in:
::Dine College Library catalog
::http://library.dinecollege.edu
::New Mexico Statue University Library catalog
::http://libcat.nmsu.edu
It's like a mini-Salem witch trial right smack in the Navajo rez! Asdzani Bah 08:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No NDN Witches? 

message: There is no reason to have corpse powder a seprate article, as it is wholly used by Navajo witches. It makes more sense for the material at that article to be a section here in this one. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 01:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. How...do we go about doing that? I've never merged articles. Nagakura shin8 (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, let's merge it. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 17:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. It was just a stub with few references, so I made a section for it in this article. Yuchitown (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I propose that Witch (Navajo) be merged into Witch. The current article does not have enough citations to stand on its own. Wikipedia does not focus on original research, which is what much of this article is. Intellectually, this article doesn't have a strong foundation. Yuchitown (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This makes more sense than merging it into Navajo, now that I look at it. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 17:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  - Since we seem to be the only ones who care, and we agree, I say we go ahead and merge it. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 00:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Right-O. Swamped right now but can help in a few days. Yuchitown (talk) 01:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see about doing it now. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 23:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

text: Done. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 00:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Yuchitown (talk) 03:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Jeanne of Bourbon, Duchess of Bourbon

message: It seems dubious that Jeanne de Bourbon almost became the queen of Charles VIII who was never a widower. First, before wedding Anne of Brittany, he was betrothed with Marguerite d'Autriche since many years (she even lived in Paris and was named the little queen by the court) and when his father Louis XI died, he was just 12 or 13 and his mother (who is mentionned as an opponant against the match) died juste months after his accession (the same year of Louis XI). I think it is strange that the dowager queen was kin to promote the union with future queen Anne as the two married years later in 1491 (and in 1483, Anne was just 5...) and was a really quick alliance made by King Charles'sister, Anne de France, who was, at this time, regent. Sorry for my english, i'm french but i really like the work you do in french history :) ==
Yes, Charles might well have become smitten with Jeanne in 1488 (or before), but (my readings do not suggest that) he ever became engaged to her. From 1483 to 1491 Charles was (officially) betrothed to Margaret (of Austria) Habsburg, although in 1488 Charles' sister, Anne of France, then (acting as) regent, may have already been thinking of having Charles ditch Margaret and marry Anne of Brittany, who became duchess of Brittany in 1488. Still, it's fun to imagine the teenage Charles bugging his sister to let him marry one or another eligible female he happens to take a fancy to, only to be told: forget it, Charles, that's never going to happen. Webrobate (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost Queen ???
Talk:David Drew Zingg

message: We're given an external link with this description: Site with bio, pictures and more, last updated prior to his death. His bio was adapted from this site.
This seems to mean that the article here is based directly on what Zingg wrote about himself. That won't do. -- Hoary (talk) 01:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced
Talk:Jerry Yulsman

message: Former aerialist , singer dancer, surgical assistant, veterinary technician, welder helper Trans Alaska pipeline, chiropractic assistant, elephant person,carpenter, nanny, personalcare attendant, wardrobe mistress, plumber pipe fitter, dog team care , horses, ducks,geese, chickens various other animals domestic, dance instructor, Redskinette ,Laurel Md majorette Fire Department,:born July 21  1948, Olney, Maryland 24.237.169.204 (talk) 06:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bobbie lee Brown
Talk:James Van Der Zee

message: Recently added:
:It is interesting to note that Van Der Zee could not have been "discovered" by the Metropolitan Museum of Art since he had been an active and highly successful photographer for more than 40 years when invited to participate in Harlem on my MInd. The exhibition itself was problematic due to the absent contribution from Black scholars.
:"a man cannot be discovered unless he exists in a void"
:-Albert Einstein
The preceding paragraph says that not he but his work had been discovered. The context makes it pretty clear that this means discovered by those who, deservedly or otherwise, are the arbiters of opinion in the particular field. It makes sense to say that his work was discovered via an exhibition, and this source (for what it's worth) backs up this claim.
I can imagine that the lack of any contribution from Black scholars might have reduced the value of the exhibition. But where is the evidence for such a claim? -- Hoary (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "discovery"

message: We should change the lead image to this. The current image was taken less than a year prior to his death and is copyrighted and blurry. My proposal is an image of him during the prime of his life, the copyright has expired, and it’s a self portrait, so it’s a more accurate representation of him and his photographic style. Thoughts? The Image Editor (talk) 16:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New lead image
Talk:Chatuchak Weekend Market

message: *Can please somebody clarify the following statement:
:and the flea market was then relocated to Saranrom Palace and settled there for 8 years. After that, it was moved again to Sanam Chai.
:IMHO is "at Saranrom Palace" and "to Sanam Chai" the same location, as the Saranrom Palace lies directly at Thanon Sanam Chai. The only possibility to house such a big market is the (about 50m wide) area between the western fence of Saranrom Park and the edge oft Thanon Sanam Chai. Today it is a kind of shady park with lots of trees. So where exactly and when was the park relocated?
*As far as I can remember, at my first visit in Bangkok in 1978 the market on Sanam Luang was not called "Sanam Luang flea Market" as stated in this article but "The Weeekend Market" or "Sanam Luang Weeekend Market".
--hdamm 13:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Years seem to given sometimes in years BCE and sometimes in Thai(?) counting.
This should be cleaned upSejtam (talk) 13:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 
Talk:Air burst

message: Need some info in meteorite airbursts - like in the Tunguska blast. Fresheneesz 09:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  meteorite airburst? 

message: To-do list to B-Class:
*Put Citations
*Add Images
*Format Page
*Expand Article
*Fix Grammar
Flubeca 16:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class Review

message: Not sure that the subject warrants an article to itself, but if it does, it needs significant improvement. The detailed discussion of shrapnel does not really belong here, although it undoubtedly needs mentioning, and more technical desriptions of the various timing/proximity mechanisms is needed. Anti-aircraft shells should not be neglected if we thingk the scope of the article covers them.
The article makes the point that shell splinters are not technically "shrapnel", which is historically true, but the usage has become so universal that as a matter of English language the point can no longer be argued. The article itself goes on to use the word in the sence of fragments. ut the article also makes the common mistake of assuming that artillery casualties are all caused by shrapnel/fragments - blast alone does serious damage to people. Cyclopaedic (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision needed 

message: Event examples and explain why it occurs. 
PS: Why meteor explodes? There are influence of blast wave reflecting or not?
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.52.148.69 (talk) 11:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a section for Natural Air Burst 

message: I came to this article in order to determine if 'air burst' is one word, two words, or a hypehend word (air-burst). This information is not contained in the article. The title uses two words, but there are a few instances of the single-word version as well. Both seem prevalent and I am not sure if there is a consensus. I'd like a single word version, but what I want is what is correct/accepted. I think a short section discussing this issue would be useful to this page (at least for me).
Leftynm (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air burst vs. Airburst 

message: Reading Killer Junior it seems like just a term/code word for air burst.  Propose adding a "Killer Junior" section - MTWEmperor (talk • contribs) 21:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Killer Junior into Air burst
Talk:Our Lady of the Good Event

message: The "Mythology" header is utterly POV at best, insulting to Catholics at worst. While the article could clearly be expressed in a more NPOV manner, this header - which is a rather large chunk of the article - is pretty unacceptable. It's no more acceptable than calling the life and times of Gautama Buddha as mere "mythology" regardless of whether or not it opposes the opinions of oneself. I think we can all improve on this article if we get to work. 98.196.146.115 (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Mythology"? Seriously?

message: I am asking the help of some Wikipedians to treanslate this page to other languages. Thank you. Mark j 10:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: This article treats catholic religious beliefs as if they are fact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptainManacles (talk • contribs) 15:59, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: any suggestion on how we can improve?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.108.196.242 (talk) 09:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: NPOV 

message: I do not have time to edit this article or get into an edit war with determined promoters of OLGS as a private revelation, but it is important to note that the connection of a private revelation attributed to Mother Mariana with the OLGS devotion is disputed. Although the content of the alleged private revelation seems excellent from a 20th c traditionalist Catholic perspective, for instance a Catholic.com user says: "My problem with Our Lady of Good Success is there no documentation before 1930. You won't find a single piece of paper on the apparition before that date as all were destroyed. The document that is the basis for the apparition is supposedly a 20th century copy made by a very old nun from another document written in a secret code that no one but her could crack which in turn was a copy of a eighteenth century document which in turn was a copy of a seventeenth century document. However, only the 1930s document still exists." from: http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=598847 This is being promoted by any number of Catholic traditionalists today as being an "approved" private revelation (there is certainly approved devotion related to the statue titled OLGS), however there is a serious need to find out from the diocese in Ecuador what they say about the alleged private revelation. The Wiki article should reflect the uncertainty regarding the private revelation.--Elizdelphi (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Private revelation disputed

message: Man, this article needs a rewrite and fast. It should raise eyebrows that there aren’t any autographs or 16th-century sources for the story surrounding the statue in Ecuador. The earliest source for the prophecy is a book from 1790.
Look at the article for St. Nilus. The prophecy attached to his name, which is nearly identical to the Good Event prophecy, is at least given a long treatment for its dubiousness. This article needs the same. Marisauna (talk) 14:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authenticity of the prophecy and apparition
Talk:Fire for effect

message: The link in the comment "According to DOD" only links to the redirection article for the acronym "DOD" and does not indicate what it means, and so the reference is unclear.
I assume that the author was referring to the US Department of Defense, but it is not clear.
Would anyone know?
ahpook (talk) 16:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to "DOD"
Talk:Rani Suhanadi

message: :Copy-pasted from BS nonsense from Cheema, full of fake citations. This seems to be User:Street Scholar's usual handiwork.Hkelkar 13:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed the context and language for accuracy and POV.--Tigeroo 15:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More junk
Talk:Marathon (chocolate bar)

message: Regarding the following paragraph, which was removed by Wikipediatrix as part of a "removed POV/OR observation" edit:-
:Today, the closest available candy to the Marathon bar is Cadbury's Curly Wurly which is sold in the United Kingdom, Australia and several other countries, but not in the U.S.
I assume this was due to "Today, the closest available candy to the Marathon bar is...". This *is* POV, albeit minor; but it could have been easily rewritten instead of removing the whole thing. As someone else mentioned the Curly Wurly again anyway, I put back the paragraph, minus POV as follows:-
:Another braided caramel and chocolate bar still sold as of 2006 is Cadbury's Curly Wurly. This is sold in the United Kingdom, Australia and several other countries, but not in the U.S.
I avoided saying "A similar bar is...", as that is still technically POV/OR. Perhaps I could find a reputable third-party source commenting upon its similarity(!!!), but including it would bloat the article more than it helped it anyway.
Fourohfour 13:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curly Wurly comparison
Talk:Oblique order

message: Would it be possible for someone to create a visual guide to the methods the prussians used in battle? Say, a picture of a field of battle and a diagram describing how the Prussian army would be maneuvering to defeat the enemy? The battle of Leuthen would be a good way to show the methods they used to ensure victory with Oblique Order visually. I'm confused by the text, but a diagram would certainly improve the article radically  and make it easier to understand the way it was implemented.207.5.159.199 (talk) 22:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Oblique Order under the Prussians
Talk:Lanhydrock House

message: Lanhydrock House is notable as a Grade I listed building, so should have its own article. At the moment, the article about the whole place is just dominated by information about the house, which is over 90% of the article text. Better to have separate article for the house, with a few lines in the Lanhydrock article only. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Would agree with HenryTemplo - this would be best split into one article for the estate and another for the parish. Joseph2302, are you willing to split the article? Gazamp (talk) 20:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a split would be good, one article for the parish, one for the house & estate. DuncanHill (talk) 20:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Split discussion

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 12:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Nampo Dam

message: I've put a request in with with the Korea Computer Center through their website  for the image of the West Sea Barrage located at  for use in this article.  I'll post when I hear back. kev. (talk) 01:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of the West Sea Barrage 

message: I've just removed the word "controversial" as the second word of the article.  In my opinion, there's a place to discuss the controversy, which can be in the later paragraph starting, "Foreign critics..."  However, for an encyclopedia article about the barrage as a structure, the introductory phrase shouldn't be "the controversial Nampho Dam..."  Of course, I welcome discussion here if anyone should feel the need to revert and discuss.  And, this is not to say that the adverse effects from the barrage cannot be discussed later in the article.  Saebvn (talk) 22:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the term "controversial" as the article's second word 

message: this article needs to be rewritten it's terrible.--71.170.100.11 (talk) 07:50, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewrite 

message: The article says the dam is a tidal barrage. However, the tidal barrage article says that a tidal barrage is designed for power generation. There is no suggestion that the Nampo Dam is doing that.--Jack Upland (talk) 22:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidal barrage?
Talk:Robert Fleming (financier)

message: Removed all current content and replaced with stub -- was a cut&paste copyvio from W. N. Smith, ‘Fleming, Robert (1845–1933)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 accessed 26 Sept 2006
--mervyn 13:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: One source I have says Sir John was the elder brother of Robert Fleming, not the younger as written here.  Please check this out.202.36.254.250 (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sir John Fleming
Talk:Aurore (2005 film)

message: For film naming conventions, this article has to be moved to Aurore (2005 film). Hoverfish 14:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article