lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:White belt

message: There isn't a page on the white belt as it relates to music.  White belts have been involved in subgenres of punk music over the last while.  I am not an authority on the topic but I'd someone to share their information.  I know some believe it's related to the genre grindcore, some relate it to the recent mainstream pop-"screamo", some relate it to screamo itself by the real definition.  Anyway I'd like to know where it came from.  Did it evolve from the black leather belts, as popularized by punk music many years ago?  Or is there more to it? xtylerx 13:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Takin' Over the Asylum

message: Very useful information about the rights problems preventing DVD release - would like to know the source.
--Cedders 13:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's more or an unsourced observation, added by User:Angmering. I think it's phrased carefully ("is unlikely") so it doesn't look like a hard fact... and it's a pretty uncontroversial topic, so I'm not particularly worried about the lack of sourcing. The JPS 14:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

text: This would be excellent if it happens. I have a ropey old VHS. The JPStalk to me 16:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Was released 09/06/08. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD release
Talk:Interface apparency

message: Not wanting to pitch a product here, but the Turbo Tax web site is a good example of apparency in that is shows the steps that the user will be taken through and tells what will be needed and how much time to expect. The list of tasks are shown in table on content type format so that the user could move around the site. This use of site maps and telling the user what to expect as well as ability to move around the tasks is common, but not always well thought-out.
Continuing with Doug's comment...it would be nice to include an example of an interface that meets these standards -- you might even be able to use an example on wikipedia to show wiki users how it relates to them --Kgroth 16:21, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments by Douglas Chelson 

message: The reason given, "nonsense/techno babble for how user-friendly an OS is," is incorrect, as well as being too simplistic.  Research on interface apparency has been funded by the National Science Foundation.  This article needs expansion and I will do so in the coming weeks.  -- Dcflyer 03:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I honestly didn't think anyone would mind this being deleted. But if you want to spend the time improving it, then I thank you. Until then, I'm going to add the confusing tag just in case someone else wants to take a crack at it. Right now, I feel that it's far too technical for your average Wikipedia user. Wyatt Riot 09:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  05 October 2006 prod
Talk:Rhinoceros (program)

message: Rhinoceros 3D is not a real name or a nick name. The product full name is Rhinoceros, sometime combined with the version name Rhinoceros 3.0 (will be Rhinoceros 4.0). Many call it just Rhino. Rhinoceros 3D is just confusing. 
--Folini 13:58, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Requirements management

message: This article seems to be more about Requirements engineering or Requirements analysis. Requirements management is more about managing the requirements, that includes controlling and tracking the requirements, mostly after they have been created in the first place. Requirement management includes things like change management and traceability. Reference: Pressman, Scott. Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. Sixth Edition, International, p 180. McGraw-Hill Education 2005.
82.181.111.113 (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is Requirements management?

message: There are many links from companies in the "external" section, bordering on advertisement. As per WP:NOTADVERTISING, I will remove those from companies, unless I get feedback from anyone here.
I plan to do that in about 24 hours.
#!/bin/DokReggar -talk 14:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link cleanup
Talk:Object Process Methodology

message: I began to wikify the article a bit, but I think it is not enough. Plus the images are still unsourced. Hervegirod 20:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification

message: In this edit I changed one section to a block quotation because it was lifted from Edward F. Crawley's forward to Dov Dori's 2016 book Model-Based Systems Engineering with OPM and SysML and was clear copyright violation. Looking through the superordinate section, , I see other chunks of text that are lifted verbatim from Dori's 2016 book, so I suspect that more of this article may be plagiarism and/or copyright violation (since Dori's 2016 book is copyright Springer Science+Business Media). I don't have time to check and/or rewrite the entire article now, so I am adding Template:Copypaste to the article. If someone will thoroughly compare this article to Dori's books and confirm that large sections of this article are NOT copied and pasted from them, then the Template:Copypaste can be removed. Biogeographist (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a copy of the book and removed some text that was clearly copy/pasted from it. The editor who added the infringing material seemed to weave in snippets of text from the 2016 book with other material (their own words? Another source? The 2002 edition of the same book?) which made hunting for the material very tedious. I did my best, but I can't guarantee I caught all the infringing material. Thanks Biogeographist for bringing it up. Ajpolino (talk) 15:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Ajpolino and @Biogeographist after the CP listing, I've gone ahead and checked this article against the book, and have had to remove about 20,000 bytes worth of content. I've tried to be as careful and non-destructive as possible, but quite honestly, I don't understand most of this. Regardless, I think a fair portion of this article should just be removed completely; It's way too detailed. I've also nominated most of the images for deletion as they're also copied from Dori's book, so I'm going to remove the  tag and mark the CP listing as solved for now. If anyone finds any other content, please ping me (and if significant, list it on CP) and I'll be happy to try to remove it. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 15:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation and/or plagiarism 

message: 2018-01-17 The links in Further Reading are dead. Mark Underwood (knowlengr) 03:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the dead links. Biogeographist (talk) 13:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead links
Talk:Old Roman Symbol

message: This precursor of the Apostles Creed is a worthy entry into Wikipedia I believe. drboisclair 14:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: I'm adding current references, which sometimes contradict the references from 35 years ago. Leadwind (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  old roman creed 

message: I have checked the Rufinus text (PDF at the Documenta Catholica Omnia site, supposed to have been transcribed, with corrections, from Migne) and it is ex Maria vigine, not et.
Perhaps the contributor was unconsciously influenced by the kai in the Greek?
In any case this is not a trivial matter, since et, like ex, produces a version that is both  grammatical and plausible.
I am correcting the offending word, and posting this here as a record of my reasons for so doing.
Mjhrynick (talk) 23:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not-so-minor ?typo? in the Latin... 

message: Shouldn't ὅθεν be πόθεν ("whence")? Or is this misspelling also in the original Creed? -- 20:18, 4 February 2013‎ 74.94.105.81
:Ὅθεν is the relative "whence".  Πόθεν would be the interrogative "whence?".  Esoglou (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in the Greek Creed 

message: What is the SOURCE of this name? Who first called it this? What was it called in the early church in the 2nd and 3rd centuries? And, WHY is it labeled as "Roman", if it is that early? It also seems weird that this supposedly came from the 2nd Century but is being called "old" vs. "early". (I read the other thread on this.) Compared with the Nicene or Apostles' documents, perhaps it was old; but "early" might be preferable. WHO exactly is titling it "old", Wikipedia or who? What was it called at its origin? That perhaps should be its actual title, if known. Misty MH (talk) 14:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Old Roman Symbol" name origin?
Talk:Circumventor

message: annother circumventor is located @ https://rossproxy.homestead.com if you are in a school htis works the best becaseu it is constantly connection securely so it cant be blocked. if you are also wandering why it is at homestead? well it is not that only contains a link to the website becuse the ip address of the computer i run it on will be hard to remember.
alo they can hide user infromation so an administrater wont be able to find out who had been using the site and they also wont be able to track down the circumventor casue it is located on a large network. wich is a good sign so i dont get busted rofl im 15 years old and i cant afford to be banned from SCHOOL HAHA os be careful if you wanna set one up goodluck =0
Why did everything I wrote get deleted???
All of mine has been deleted as well ^_^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.255.9 (talk • contribs) 
: I didn't "delete" your material; I integrated it into the existing text since it was partially redundant. None of what you wrote is gone, it has just taken a different form. Haakon 15:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Euromethod

message: Hello,
somme phrases recently added are copys of paragraphs from some books (example). I am not an expert of procedures of Wikipedia in english, so if someone else could check and take the necessary actions... Thanks.ALDO CP (talk) 07:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations 

message: Wow, this article is a mess. I've added a bunch of tags, but I'm not even sure if this article even needs saving. If someone wants to put in the work to clean this up, please do, but otherwise feel free to PROD/AFD this. rchard2scout (talk) 11:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , a revert helped greatly. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 00:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup required
Talk:Feature-driven development

message: Is it just me, or does this article (and the introduction in particular) sound far too laudatory and gushing? --maru   (talk)  contribs 00:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: The article references Tables 2 and 3... only Table 1 is actually on the page.  134.173.60.9 (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables...? 

message: The article isn't clear on when and how human testing takes place. If the features could take two weeks to develop, then is testing always lagging behind in subsequent development cycles?  With scrum, the tendency is break work down into sub-features that take 2 *days* to develop, meaning that they can be tested and reviewed by the PO within the same development cycle.  Non/less-iterative processes tend to do some/all of the development, followed by doing some/all of the testing.  It would be helpful for someone who knows FDD to address this in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.86.34.79 (talk) 15:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Testing ? 

message: It is listed in the outside links. We do not need to name drop it in every single section of the article. I have removed the sentences that do. If it needs to be referenced more properly take it from there. HRouillier (talk) 05:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: NB regarding Luca's site
Talk:Assumption-based planning

message: This article is written in a manner that advocates the use of the article subject rather than providing objective information. 
Statements such as "It is for that reason that ABP should be strongly interwoven into the whole business planning process" should not be in an encyclopedia article.
Also, the article is written in the 2nd person, as if it were an instructional passage. Again, this is not conventional for encyclopedia articles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.186.19 (talk) 18:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advocates rather than informs

message: Critical assumption planning appears to have little or no notability by itself. The Sykes and Dunham paper has only been cited 13 times in 14 years, and it gets a mere handful number of Google hits. Fences&Windows 21:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of [[Critical assumption planning]]
Talk:The DNAgents

message: BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 16:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source suggestions
Talk:Engelhard

message: My recommendations:
* "Engelhard" should be a redirect to the disambiguation page.
* This page should be "Engelhard Corporation"
* Material needs to be added to connect it to "Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation" and "Phibro Corporation"
* More history like the 1967 merger of "Chemicals Philipp Inc." with Engelhard () patsw 03:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect and Disambig. 
Talk:Edmund Beaufort, 2nd Duke of Somerset

message: The son of John Baufort, 1st Earl of Somerset, with the same name John Beaufort is said to be the 1st Duke of Somerset (see there).
So why Edmund should be the 1st? The page "Edmund Beaufort, 2nd Duke of Somerset" ist redirected to "Edmund Beaufort, 1st Duke of Somerset". Is that correct?
:The title Duke of Somerset was created twice, in 1443 and 1448 (as well as some other times). Each time the title is created/recreated, the numbering starts again from one.Richard75 18:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Despite the fact that this title was created twice in five years, I have moved the article back to Edmund Beaufort, 2nd Duke of Somerset because both of his successors are listed by the numbers "3rd" and "4th" suggesting that Edmund is the 2nd Duke. Most histories I have read about the family note him as the second duke, even if the DNB names him the first duke. His title was granted as a successor of his brother's title and thus he should be the 2nd duke of Somerset. If you disagree, then you must also move the two other dukes Henry Beaufort, 3rd Duke of Somerset and Edmund Beaufort, 4th Duke of Somerset as they are a part of the same second creation. Cheers.–Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 20:25, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he the 1st or 2nd Duke of Somerset? 

message: It says "Edmund Beaufort, styled 3th Duke of Somerset". Should "3th" be 3rd or 4th? Art LaPella (talk) 03:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Aren't John of Gaunt and Katherine Swyndford his paternal great-grandparents as appose to grandparents? His paternal grandfather was the 1st John Beaufort.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.147.136.147 (talk) 16:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  3th 

message: Do we know anything about Edmund's son Thomas? He is listed in this article b 1442 d 1517 and Weir's Genealogy is cited, but Weir's listing gives no birth date and says he died young before 1463. In the article under Edmund Beaufort, 4th Duke of Somerset, Pollard is quoted 'His [Edmund, 4th Duke] younger brother John had been killed during the battle, and as both died unmarried, "the house of Beaufort and all the honours to which they were entitled became extinct",' which also implies Thomas died before his brothers Edmund and John in 1471. 
So do we correct Thomas' listing in this article to remove the birth date and give the death as before 1463 per Weir? Or does anyone know where the dates 1442-1517 came from and can correct the citation?  History Lunatic (talk) 08:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Beaufort?
Talk:Spring day

message: I changed this article from a mixed redirect into a proper (if skeletal) article about Spring Day, whatever that means in a particular place, offering examples. This could be reduced again to a disambig, but then it could also be fleshed out. Firsthand, I only know the Argentine celebration, which is quite notable; I've read there are similar celebrations in Bolivia and Peru, at least, but I need to research that. Any help will be appreciated. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 12:08, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten
Talk:List of Highways in Perth

message: I suggest this page be merged.  What "is" and "is not" a highway is a rather murky topic, and Wikipedia's list being based on the common name I believe is a bit misleading.  For instance what we know as Stock Road/Mandurah Road is Main Roads' Fremantle-Rockingham Highway.  Similar goes for roads like the Kenwick Link, Orrong Road, Karrinyup/Morley Dr etc and many other roads which are treated by Main Roads as highways, yet officially not called such.Ian peters 14:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge
Talk:The Masked Man

message: I was just wondering about the "Ability to inibriate self" bit in abilities. I haven't read this series since it was initially published, and it certainly was at times a humorous title so such an "event" could have happened, but by being the only notation (nothing like "excellent two-fisted street fighter" noted) it tends to give the implication that the character of Masked Man had something inherent about alcohol and it's use in his depiction, which is false. The series was actually sweet and good-natured, hearkening back to the Golden Age "aw shucks" type heroes. Once I get a better hang of this wikipedia thing, and have access to my comics, I'll see if I can do a proper overview/write up. But maybe this should be removed?
167.127.24.69 19:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure that comment was a bit of vandalism left by someone with an immature sense of humor.  I deleted it.  Just a rule of thumb for you--the abilities section should list an actual superpower or skill, not something that sounds silly.  Unless the superhero in question really does have a silly power (see Matter-Eater Lad).  Konczewski 21:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 21:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Masked Man →  – "The Masked Man" is the character and comic title; The Masked Man is currently a little-used redirect to a minor character from Celebrity Deathmatch which would be better served by a disambig on top of the page BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Support Since the title of this comic is "The Masked Man", which doesn't even redirect here and no hatnote at the target, it's very likely there are readers who looked for this article and couldn't find it. At the very least, The Masked Man needs to be retargeted here. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 April 2023
Talk:Friedrich Dollmann

message: I have informations that tell he was born in 1882. -- John N. 14:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe that the aspect ratio of the infobox image in this article is such that presented at the infobox's default value it is too large, the visual equivalent of SHOUTING.  I suggest that the current size is more appropriate. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox image size
Talk:Feminist philosophy

message: i'm not going to pretend this article is any good. it's a start by someone who knows very little about the topic.... i was just amazed to find no wikipedia article on this already, so i had to add one. maybe now its here that will motivate someone who actually knows something about this to work on it --SJK 14:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't visited this entry in a while and was surprised to find how much improvement it's undergone. Great work on the introduction whoever added it! - Atfyfe (talk) 22:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: I have moved the list of feminist philosophers here; there is no need for it - we have a category :Category:Feminist philosophers already. Someone may want to double check the list, and create any red linked entries. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: List

message: Some topics in feminist philosophy include:
#Feminist aesthetics
#Feminist metaphysics
#Feminist epistemology
#Feminist ethics
#Feminist existentialism
#Feminist empiricism  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoseTr (talk • contribs) 20:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topics in feminist philosophy 

message: Hello! In the "Works" section "Women, Race and Class" links to Davis' page despite the book having its own. I do not know how to change it, someone please do. Samiwamy (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to "Women, Race and Class" 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kso253 (talk) 20:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: WGS 300w Feminist Theories

message: — Assignment last updated by Stiehlera (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Feminist Philosophy
Talk:Eclipse (magazine)

message: This is not to be confused with Eclipse Magazine  Entertainment News Network which has the website eclipsemagazine.com AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The other Eclipse Magazine 

message: Should this be moved? GCD and the magazine itself's indicia use "Eclipse, the Magazine" for #1 and just "Eclipse" for #2-8, so shouldn't this be at either Eclipse, the Magazine or Eclipse (magazine)? BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 08:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Royston Tan

message: I removed the whole chunk of text cut-and-pasted from http://www.nhk.or.jp/sun_asia/aff/e/6th_02e.html
Please rewrite or request for permission (WP:BRP) from the originating website before reincluding it into the article. --Dodo bird 14:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of copyrighted text

message: I've removed the banner and cat until a reliable source can be found regarding Tan's sexuality. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 22:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT Banner 

message: I've undone a bot edit on "Pong" (Line 85) that linked to the video game entry for Pong. Please, anyone, provide a reliable source for this credit.-- mo (talk) 18:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography as actor 