lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Günter Meisner

message: There are currently two articles about Günter Meisner: Günter Meisner and Gunter Meisner.  I suggest that the Gunter Meisner article (the one with the umlaut missing) become a redirect page for Günter Meisner.  LewPotT 23:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --217.95.63.209 (talk) 12:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect [[Gunter Meisner]] to [[Günter Meisner]]?

message: If I have time I will work on this, but otherwise, will somebody please help me out. Ste900R (talk) 07:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Work Converting The German Version of the Page to English
Talk:Mighty Servant 2

message: An anonymous editor changed the sentence about MS2's haulage of FFG 58 from "most famous job" to "most famous job from an American viewpoint." I think the only job that could even possibly compare to the 1988 hauling of a U.S. warship was the one during which MS2 sank. Thoughts? PRRfan 17:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Most famous job
Talk:Helvi Mustonen

message: Helvi Mustonen is a Finnish artist. Unfortunately, no English sources exists. There is not many in Finnish, either. However she is a member of artists' organisations and has received a few honours. Regards "mr. Finn Smith". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.102.37.207 (talk) 14:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Günther Anders

message: This needs help! I could not bear the fact that no meaningful entry on Günther Anders existed, so I scribbled some of the salient elements.  But decent references are lacking, and lots more meat.
 The man won the Adorno Prize in 87, I believe...Actio (talk) 19:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm changing this to German. After all, Anders is well-known for his many writings on atheism, and has been called a "professional atheist." His Jewish background defined his life only insofar as he had to flee Germany in 1933--but as a leftist he was in danger anyway. Even his famous parents had a secular identity as German scholars.
Hmarcuse (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't be ridic.2604:2000:9046:800:6C34:457B:2212:8B94 (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Jewish" philosopher?
Talk:321

message: Is there more information on the the Edict of 321 by Constantine?  Set aside for the Sabbath, should it not state set aside for the Jews as the Christians already set aside the 1st day as a holy day, clearly stated by numerous sources from the early 1st/2nd century, some even refering to it as the 8th day.  Rick4him@hotmail.com
:Early Christians did not in fact have a Sunday Sabbath if you look into history Constantine made a lot of change to the religion in the 320s--174.45.157.36 (talk) 21:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:USS Atlanta (CL-51)

message: The Atlanta had the gun firepower of three destroyers with 5 inch guns.  Some destroyers had 4 inch guns.
Any surface ship a 6 inch gun would have effective against, the 5 inch gun would have also been effective.
A destroyer didn't have armor.  Atlanta had armor.
The Atlanta weighed 3 times more than a destroyer at full load.Azeh (talk) 00:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlanta was a cruiser, not a destroyer 

message: The Wikipedia pages Naval_Battle_of_Guadalcanal and Japanese_battleship_Hiei mentioned that Hiei fired at hit Atlanta, killing Norman Scott. This page, along with the Norman Scott page, claim it was the USS_San_Francisco_(CA-38) with no mention of the Hiei. Both events appear to be well referenced. This is inconsistent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barneygumble (talk • contribs) 15:44, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This is also reported by the captain Tameichi Hara who captained the destroyer Amatsukaze during the battle. Japanese Destroyer Captain. New York & Toronto: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-345-27894-1. 216.170.52.243 (talk) 18:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battleship Hiei involvement 

message: what was Atalanta's max firing range of her main battery? 24.116.140.83 (talk) 11:36, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use Atlanta max range of her main battery?
Talk:Old Korean

message: As far as i know, this site[] is the most standard differentiation.
:“Most standard”? There are several, and AFAIR none is generally accepted. Wikipeditor 06:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The generally accepted age differentiation of korean language

message: I agree that the terms godae/jungse gugeo are biased to the point that I'm uncomfortable with them in most contexts, and I'm glad the Korean Wikipedia tries to avoid such terms.
At the same time, I think we should use the most common term for the box, so I think it should be godae gugeo. Such boxes in any Wikipedia article can be purely descriptive – the way a Wikipedia names its articles is a different story. Wikipeditor 06:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box 

message: http://linguistics.byu.edu/classes/Ling450ch/reports/korean.html
Ono Susumu has compared a so-called Korean word Phuwa(lung), but such word doesn't exist in Korean. Lung is 허파(heopa) in native Korean. Because of this false comparation, the Austronesian theory has spread everywhere. It is not even a Korean word, and in the first place, a single word can't be the evidence of language classification. Please help to delete this false reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.247.135.183 (talk) 12:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be 부화(pühua; 훈몽자회(예산 문고본)(1527)). (Modern Korean 부아) Jeannebluemonheo (talk) 10:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ono Susumu's mysterious word "Phuwa" 

message: (I'm new to Wikipedia so tell me if I did something wrong)
So this phonology section makes no sense. Old Korean has no unanimous phoneme inventory and I can certainly tell you that this phonology section makes no sense. Old Korean had no voiced/unvoiced distinction (近=巾, 答=沓, 兮=雞 (삼국사기三國史記)) and, I mean, where did this seemingly arbitrary phoneme inventory with no reference?
--Jeannebluemonheo (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonology 

message: In the "Syllable structure" section, the article says:
"On the other hand, Middle Korean consonant clusters are believed not to have existed in Old Korean and to have formed after the twelfth century with the loss of intervening vowels."
 
But in the "Aspirate consonants" section, it says:
"The Middle Korean series of aspirated stops and affricates developed from mergers of consonant clusters involving /h/ or a velar obstruent, which in turn had formed from the loss of intervening vowels. To what extent this process had occurred in the Old Korean period is still debated."
Isn't it the case that if there were no clusters in Old Korean yet, then the transformation of clusters into aspirates couldn't have happened in Old Korean either? 62.73.69.121 (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:USS Duncan (DD-485)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pls add what it was named after Thehistorianisaac (talk) 15:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Händel-Werke-Verzeichnis

message: Why is there a composer-stub on this page?  HWV 258  00:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?
Talk:USS Laffey (DD-459)

message: The ship was not sunk during the war. 2600:6C65:777F:EE46:2D72:D1FD:60FC:BE62 (talk) 02:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You might be thinking of USS Laffey (DD-724), which was launched as a replacement for this vessel. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information
Talk:No Love for Johnnie

message: The plot summary, if you've seen the film, doesn't make sense unless it accepts that Johnnie has been RE-elected, and is not a newly elected MP, as one key scene at the beginning of the left-wing conspiracy which uses him makes clear.  We are led to believe that he's a serving MP of some seniority ( as the PM makes clear at the end of the film) who has been held back because his wife is on the far left of him.  Pity Box and Thomas so liked making the film - it lacks edge precisely because of that, and because of its appeal to the conventional wisdom of the centre, which sustained the Tory fifties and early sixties.  Not that accurate about the 1950-51 Labour Government - on top of which, it asks us to assume that Labour won the 1951 electionDelahays (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

message: Saw this film last night on Talking Pictures - might be worth mentioning that Oliver Reed has a minor role in the party scene as 'man with head in a bucket'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:3D84:D900:C9D8:3D19:E0BC:2382 (talk) 09:01, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oliver Reed
Talk:Callander railway station

message: Some clarity is needed here. The Callander station that closed in 1965 (sometimes called Callander "Dreadnought" station after the nearby hotel) was entirely on C&OR metals. The original terminus station of the DD&CR was located further east - its site became the goods yard when the C&OR opened. Thus, the station referred to in this article was never the terminus of the DD&CR. The C&OR diverged from the DD&CR at "Callander & Oban Junction", a little to the east of the original station/goods yard. 84.65.35.156 14:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that a suitable explanation is added. The line to the east to correctly split off from the C&O article to reflect the two separate companies. The information you have given was not known to me at the time. Possibly a way forward is to create Callander (DD&CR) railway station to recognise that station. I am not sure how recognise the preceding station (Doune) as on the DD&CR on the disused railway info box. Stewart 14:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Callander's Stations (DD&CR & C&OR)  

message: https://flickr.com/photos/trainsandstuff/30075437097/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.209.230.13 (talk) 19:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exccellent photo of Callander's "Dreadnought" Station
Talk:USS Northampton (CA-26)

message: I've read that the US Navy removed torpedo tubes from all its heavy cruiser prior to WW-II, and specifically I've found a couple of non-authoritative websites which say the Northampton class cruisers had their torpedo tubes removed in a 1935 refit.  However I haven't yet been able to track down an reputable source.  I'll keep looking around, but if someone else could locate a good reference then the Armament section should be updated. Occasional Reader (talk) 21:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Torpedoes removed?

message: As this is a history of the Northampton, details of a particular individual casualty should be left out. DermottBanana (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hilan Ebert 

message: This article says that Northampton received six battle stars, while the Jason Robards-article says five. So, which one is correct? 93.204.245.148 (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle Stars 

message: The picture above the statistics, while labeled as being of the USS Northapton, cannot possibly be correct. The same picture is used in the article about the Pensacola class cruisers, an entirely different ships class. A quick look at the picture shows that the ship has four turrets mounting tens guns (2x2, 2x3) which definitely makes the ship a Pensacola class cruiser. All the Northapton class cruisers had three triple turrets.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.201.79 (talk) 22:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I removed the picture above the statistics as it was not a picture of a actual NH class CA (read message above). Until a better one of the NH is found we should leave it empty and not confuse readers by using the wrong picture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Switchbreed (talk • contribs) 14:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Picture
Talk:Shinkiro

message: "Some go as far to compare every Shinkiro-drawn face to the actor George Clooney's"
NPOV? And who are these "some"?
*Even I've got to agree with that: he does make them look like Clooney.--Kung Fu Man 11:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Scott Hull (musician)

message: The German wikipedia article has much more information than this one  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.170.68.113 (talk) 00:20, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Scott also fronted Gnomes of Zurich with Joachim Breuer and Matt Entsminger of Janitor Joe. Should this page contain an exhaustive list?
:The Scott of that band is the Scott Hull of this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.46.104.214 (talk) 22:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other bands 

message: Why is there no mention of his solo album Requiem?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.179.18.47 (talk) 22:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requiem
Talk:Main Square, Kraków

message: See discussion here.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  14:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Link update: the archived discussion from 2006 is at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal_talk:Poland/Poland-related_Wikipedia_notice_board/Archive_7#Rynek_G.C5.82.C3.B3wny_-_rename.3F
Bernie doesn't fit Slaybish (talk) 03:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename from Rynek Głowny

message: * "Main Square, Kraków" -wikipedia  172,000 results
* "Main Market Square, Kraków" -wikipedia  68,800 results 
* "Grand Square, Kraków" -wikipedia  33,200 results
"Rynek Główny" does not translate as "Grand" in English. It translates as "Main", because in Polish only "Wielki" means "Grand" as in "Rynek Wielki", which in wrong. I suggest we rename the article again, but this time as the Main Square, Kraków. Poeticbent talk 03:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *. Poeticbent talk 13:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change: we've been here before...

message: This article would be B-class if it had more inline references. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review
Talk:URI normalization

message: I think there should be suggestions of popular web based url normalizers mentioned within the article or the External Links section.--NeF (talk) 20:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions of popular web based url normalizers 

message: This GIF serves as the article image:
Does anyone else feel that this is a bit gratuitous? I don't know why it needs to be animated, especially with the fades. --mikechen (talk) 22:11, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that this is a good visual explanation of URL normalization. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 20:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

text: I agree the fades and animation are bad, I was really confused about what the gif meant when I first visited the page. A stationary image showing those transitions would be more clear. Celiacunningham (talk) 12:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with the animation? 

message: Will the following two URLs be considering equal?
* http://www.example.com
* http://www.example.com/
If so, should the page be updated to reflect this? -- Ernstdehaan (talk) 13:12, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Pro, this traling slash is absolutely redundant -- Polluks ★ 14:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that you are mistaken. When you leave off the slash you are forcing the server to do a redirect, and it takes slightly longer for the page to load. It's a small effect, but every little bit of improvement in loading time helps. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about a missing slash for a root path 

message: There is a "Please Clarify" request after the text "Search engines employ URL normalization in order to assign importance to web pages". I think I can clarify this, but I am theorizing, and I am not an expert in this domain. My clarification attempt: Search Engines will give you an SEO penalty if you post duplicate content. By using URL normalization, you can signal to a search engine that you have duplicate content. This way the search engine knows to only use one version of the duplicate content, and the search engine will not give you a penalty for containing duplicate content. Thus the search engine will assign your website a higher importance, and your website will show up more in search results. Okthatsnice (talk) 02:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify: Search engines employ URL normalization in order to assign importance to web pages
Talk:Force 10 from Navarone

message: Force 10 Team
The team is described by the author has having the following equipment on their person or carried in their pack.
*Capt. Mallory - MP40(described as a Schmeisser), Luger P08 suppressed, black rubber frogman's suit, pitons and hammer.
*Cpl. Miller - MP40, Luger P08 suppressed, black rubber frogman's suit.
*Col. Sravros - MP40, Luger P08, F&S knife, undefined number of Model 24 stick grenades.
*Sgt. Reynolds - MP40, Luger P08 suppressed, F&S knife, Model 24 stick grenades.
*Sgt. Groves - MP40, Luger P08 suppressed, Model 24 stick grenades.
*Sgt. Saunders - MP40, combined radio transmitter reciever.
The team 'borrows' some climbing ropes and the explosives are a submersible mine that is dropped by a lone Lancaster bomber.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Mercenary 73 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Force 10 Team and equipment 

message: The Partisans commanded by General Vukalovic are trapped in the Zenica Cage, this is described by the author as the western side of a central Yugoslavian valley and is surrounded by impassable mountains on two sides and the Neretva river the other sides. The only escape routes are the Zenica Gap, the Western Gap, the Neretva bridge and the Neretva dam all of which are controlled by the Germans.
--The Mercenary 73 (talk) 19:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Zenica Cage 

message: That doesn't sound like an ending to the novel, the characters descending the gorge near the dam. I feel like there's more to this story. I know it's not the same as the movie, but this is when the team moves to blow up the dam to stop the German advance. 
Also some of the existing plot description needs some help, it's a little convoluted and could use some untangling. Deliusfan (talk) 03:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the synopsis complete?
Talk:Robert Holmes à Court

message: What about a mention of the Heytesbury stud Keysbrook?Gnangarra 14:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Holmes a Court was propped up by the Australian government after the 1987 crash. His holdings after that were partly paid for by the tax-payer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.21.214 (talk) 15:47, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Inflation in the Australian currency is also partly caused  by propping up Holmes a Court.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.21.214 (talk) 09:57, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1987
Talk:Tōya Maru

message: Not sure what is correct.
Intro paragraph says "It is said that 1139 people aboard were killed in the accident, however the exact number of fatalities remains unknown."
Text of article says "Of the 1,309 on board only 150 people survived, while 1,159 (1,041 passengers, 73 crew and 41 others) died."
26 September says "1954 - Japanese rail ferry Toya Maru sinks during a typhoon in the Tsugaru Strait, Japan killing 1,172."
I guess what the intro says "the exact number of fatalities remains unknown" is true.
Jons63 12:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of dead?

message: What were the other four ferries that sank? How many people died aboard them? Were they also lost on 26 September? Drutt (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Four other ferries
Talk:Tomie

message: *Museum of Terror Vol.1 review - Mania
-- Lucia Black (talk) 09:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref(s)

message: In my opinion, "These terse tales of terror tell the story" contains too much alliteration and detracts from the tone expected of an encyclopaedia. If there are no objections in 30 days, I will edit this sentence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeremyR (talk • contribs) 12:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; it sounds a bit like advertising which goes against our neutral point of view policy, not to mention that it isn't really part of the plot at all. Please be bold and feel free to correct the section, no need to wait that long. Opencooper (talk) 12:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9vyyo1/anyone_wikieditingsavvy_feminist_ideology_added/
©Geni (talk) 05:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: current editing dispute linked from Reddit
Talk:SS Carnatic

message: The Carnatic, a fine clipper ship of 871 tons, built at Sunderland by Pile in 1867 ... some of my ancestors took a voyage on this ship in 1881... I'll do more research..Erich (talk) 05:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: There is another Carnatic
Talk:Ironbottom Sound

message: I noticed that the map of wrecks in Ironbottom Sound indicates the location of , which, though damaged, did not sink at the Battle of Tassafaronga, and survived the war to be scrapped in 1959.  Ideally, someone should correct or replace this map. Jrt989 (talk) 03:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of wrecks incorrect 
Talk:Meltdown (Red Dwarf)

message: eats his light bee? What the hell is that?
: Technically he swallowed it.  At the end of the ep, Lister asks Holly for Rimmer's light bee (the thing that floats around inside Rimmer to project his hologram), and he then swallows it.  He then suggests going for a curry. Lugnuts 16:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added an explanatory note in the article. Incidentally, this episode introduced the light bee. --Mrwojo (talk) 18:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Light bee

message: Surely the plot of this episode was largely lifted from the Star Trek original series, third season episode "The Savage Curtain"? I actually watched the Red Dwarf episode first, and The Savage Curtain recently, and the similarities are striking.
Roxana Q (talk) 13:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While that might be, we shouldn't mention it in the article unless we can cite a source. The article mentions that it is similar to Westworld, which seems likely as well, but it might be removed unless a source is added. --Mrwojo (talk) 04:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Trek the original series

message: I think one information is missing in section about cultural references. Elvis sings a parody on some US army march, it is very important cultural reference. But I dont know name of this song. Please, can somebody add it? Thanks. --Gjjm (talk) 18:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The song is known as a military cadence - I've duly added a note to the page. Pasicles (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song 

message: I know it's OR so I can't mention it in the article, but I saw a repeat of the episode yesterday and the end credit says 'Pythagorus' not 'Pythagoras'. Careless, really. LenF54 (talk) 16:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credits