Talk:Eason Chan

message: No new 'content' is required to improve this- If you will remember from our beginner WP lessons: Less IS more. Simply removing partisan elements- ie the redundant praise- could improve this noticeably...& oh, hey what about the gossip- Stay or go? Anyone? Oh yeah, that's the crucial "Criticism" - & "we all know" all about that. 
The careful editor will also note that above I actually have proposed additional content to improve this article. But b/c I choose to invest in process, I'm not interested in tinkering inside the article per se: I'm not "glad" this fan article is here; &I won't care if it's soon gone. Any such suggestion seems proprietry. But I might nominate this fan article for deletion; Certainly if it doesnt rate the interest of contributors- as is claimed.
So, sorry if my suggestions raise emotions here, but I think emotion goes to the heart of these issues. Fansites and promotion are not the point of WP; Worse, fansites breed more fansites. This contributes confusion around what is appropriate- or "Good"- writing. I dont  claim to represent or understand "Wikipedians" or anyone else; I am an editor who supports the guidelines- b/c "good" writing can support more clear thinking. For them who claim to "Be WP-ian", well, this ia a tagged fansite. And... what does WP do with fansites? Hilarleo (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can propose a deletion since no one will oppose you....until someone removes the tag as absurd straight away. Rather than spend so much time complaining, you can always try help out with all those suggestions you just gave. Otherwise, wait till someone does something. Dengero (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

text: To meet your rather outrageous challenge, I haven't lost any AfDs regarding the notability of Chinese-language musicians. To even suggest deletion pretty much tells us you have no idea who this guy is; if that were the case, you could tell us that it's poorly written. You did, but no, you had to cross the line. Pandacomics (talk) 05:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: propose deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Eason Chan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101202082553/http://www.easonchan.net/newforum/viewthread.php?tid=4535&extra=page%3D1 to http://www.easonchan.net/newforum/viewthread.php?tid=4535&extra=page%3D1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Eason Chan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141230101402/https://sg.entertainment.yahoo.com/news/louis-koo-2014s-highest-earning-celebrity-084700642.html to https://sg.entertainment.yahoo.com/news/louis-koo-2014s-highest-earning-celebrity-084700642.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ifpihk.org/www_1/se4e.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.easonchan.net/music
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://easonchan.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified