Talk:Romanus Pontifex

message: Yuioplkjhga (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

message: :This argumentation is not convincing. The existing of the bull Romanus Pontifex of 1455 is denied. As a proof is a link added, which mentions the bull Romanus Pontifex of 1506 . If there is a second bull with the same name, then you are free to publish another article and add a page for disambiguation. I am in doubt about your source. I found no other information about such a bull in 1506. But there are many sources, which report about the bull Romanus Pontifex of 1455, e.g.
:* Religion & Exploration at University of Calgary
:* Popes For Slavery
:Please verify your arguments. Either provide other sources or remove your links to www.newadvent.org and the neutrality tag in the article.
:Tomatom (talk) 07:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no other sources with the doubtful arguments of www.newadvent.org. So I remove the links and the neutrality tag. --Tomatom (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Web page you quote "Popes for Slavery" is not a reliable source, being a polemical website. www.newadvent.org on the other hand is a reliable site which carries official documents and the Catholic encyclopedia, and should not be removed. There seems to be evidence that the Bull exists, however the presentation of its content has been poorly balanced. Xandar 02:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Under heading Impact and subtitle America
The information concerning the Johnson ruling by the US Supreme Court was not correct; the ruling removed particularly the right of occupancy; it was only with the consent of the Europeans and the Americans later on. Of course, it said they couldn't have title either. I have added sources to this part of the text.
The other information the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worcester v. Georgia is not entirely correct; perhaps someone can do that adjustment. The court actually reversed part of its ruling, saying that "Indian" nations were sovereign. There are also no references, and links to other Wpedia articles cannot serve in place of citations.Ebanony (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impact 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Romanus Pontifex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071218151827/http://www.ucalgary.ca:80/applied_history/tutor/eurvoya/relex.html to http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/eurvoya/relex.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Romanus Pontifex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924030506/http://www.historytools.org/sources/Johnson-v-MIntosh.pdf to http://www.historytools.org/sources/Johnson-v-MIntosh.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified