lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:World Professional Darts Championship

message: what is the prize money for the champion of the lakeside darts tournament?
:Jelle Klaasen was handed a GBP 60K check. 
*Prior comment is unsigned*
* B.D.O. is GBP 100k cheque for the winner and GBP 30k for the runner up Will1701 (talk) 19:28, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the ladies world champions be listed here? Snowman (talk) 11:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it probably should: I can't find the winners listed anywhere on Wikipedia and definitely deserving of a mention. Officially Mr X (talk) 18:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ladies darts

message: The following is moved from a personal Talk Page.
Hello, Phil Bridger. Nice to greet you this morning! Do you have any sources you could add to the World Darts Championships articles? I couldn't find any, but of course I am not really conversant with the subject. Sincerely, your friend, GeorgeLouis (talk) 13:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have asked the Darts project for help. I'm sure that these articles can be sourced, as they are about world championships in a sport that is very popular in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, but I don't have the time at the moment to dig out the sources myself. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  As you say, they can all be sourced since they would have all been covered extensively in the UK press. It will take time for someone to dig up all the results though, especially for the earlier tournaments (pre-internet media and all that). wjematherbigissue 20:56, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Darts Championships 

message: What are the age limits? Mobile mundo (talk) 21:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youth World Champions
Talk:Cromañón nightclub fire

message: I was under the impression that the night club was called "República de Kromagnon", as this was the name that appeared at the entrance. I've never been there or heard about it before the fire, so I wouldn't really know. Helios 18:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was Cromañón. --Againme (talk) 21:39, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:David Humphreys (rugby union)

message: Is there a Wiki page for Ulster Rugby anywhere?  Could be good to have that linked in to this somehow.
:Ulster Rugby. --195.7.32.3 11:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cecil Purdy

message: Quoth the article:
:He died playing chess OTB (Over The Board, meaning face to face), his final words being "I have a win, but it will take some time".
I don't want to sound like a rotten skeptic, but does anybody have a reputable source (ie, not some random webpage itself unsourced) for this? If it's probably apocryphal, that's fine, but we should probably say that "there is a story that..." rather than just state it as a bald fact. --Camembert
This can be verified (or debunked) as I know some of the witnesses to this event, including the doctor who treated him when he collapsed. However it is not likely I will speak to them for a few months. shaunpress
I believe this story to be true.  In the book "How Purdy Won: The Correspondence Chess Career of a World Champion" () which was co-authored by Frank Hutchings (CJS Purdy's son-in-law) the story is repeated with the quote exactly as you describe above.  stephen.frost
: I have read it in print somewhere, from a reliable source.  I can't remember where though.  Bubba73 (talk), 15:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: shaunpress left the following comment on my Talk page back in July 2007: On another matter, the CJS Purdy entry contains the apocryphal last words story ("I have a win but it may take some time") without any citation. I was going to add "Cite Needed" but reading your comments on this matter, you may want to take sterner action. I've spoken to a few people who have better knowledge of the incident than me (including Dr Vasil Tulevski who was present) and (a) no one has confirmed he said those words and (b) according to Ian Rogers it was unlikely he would have said that as in the final position he stood worse after being better earlier in the game. Peter Ballard (talk) 03:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Purdy's last words

message: The last game of Purdy's in ChessBase is one against Ian Rogers and this as the final position.  White just moved 43. Ka1.  Since Rogers is quoted regarding Purdy's last words and game, this may be it.  He may have sealed Ka1, in a lost position.  Bubba73 (Who's attacking me now?), 21:20, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, probably not.  Rogers said that Purdy would not have mistaken a drawn position from a win, but this position is a loss.  Bubba73 (Who's attacking me now?), 21:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  last words, last game?
Talk:Convertible security

message: There are way too many pages on convertibles, some of them should be merged. Finnancier 13:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many pages on convertibles

message: Derivative is derivative (finance) so I thought I'd move this one to convertible security.--Jerryseinfeld 19:13, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:John Nunn

message: The article cites nothing to indicate that Nunn is a polymath. The sentence that says he is has only references to his chess books. Erniecohen (talk) 01:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A polymath? 

message: About time they gave John Nunn *at least* an OBE. Shocking he isn't even an MBE (unless he discreetly refuses honours on principle, what with the term 'empire' in them 'n all ... or something.).
2402:3A80:A1A:A466:E05A:9F6E:D03E:8CF7 (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  no honours for Nunn?
Talk:Decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent

message: Buddhism challenge for brahmanism rule
The article contains a number of statements referenced to this book. However the reliability of both the author and the book is highly contentious given the controversial subject of the article. Firstly, the author Gail Omvedt doesn't possess any academic qualifications related to Indian or Buddhist history. Her opinions on this highly controversial historical subject have hardly any credibility. Secondly, the book cited is sloppy, inaccurate and partisan, which represents an Ambedkarite interpretation of Buddhist history in India. 
This is what the leading Buddhist scholar and indologist Richard Gombrich has to say about the book:
“A thoroughly bad book presents the reviewer with a melancholy dilemma. Would it not be kinder to author and publisher to say nothing, to leave the book unreviewed? But then, should the public not be warned? And should one not try to preserve standards? [...] The book is appallingly slapdash and inaccurate at every level [...] The book seems to have been compiled from a random selection of secondary sources, although they are not always accurately reported, and contradictions are blithely ignored.” Stormbird (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliability of "Buddhism in India: Challenging Brahmanism and Caste" 

message: Contrary to popular belief, Indian Buddhism survived, without interruption, among the Newars of Nepal and Baruas of Bangladesh. A significant freaction of them continue to practice Buddhism even today. It lingerd on for several centuries in several other regions of India, long after the end of Viharas at Nalanda etc.
Someone has deleted the related information (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decline_of_Buddhism_in_the_Indian_subcontinent&oldid=624257182). I will add it back. Malaiya (talk) 01:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Survival of Indian Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent
Talk:Charlotte Brontë

message: Probably deserve their own section given that there were over 500 of them. Heger's get a section with only 4.
I might add this later myself JjStrawb (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ellen Nussey Letters? 

message: There is currently a discussion on this subject at Talk:Constantin Héger to which you might wish to contribute. Masato.harada (talk) 16:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Héger or Heger? 

message: For those who do not wish to look up what noms de plume means, it is French and the translation is "pen names." I believe this makes sense. 64.146.166.61 (talk) 21:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Publication 

message: The word pensionnat is French meaning "boarding school." 64.146.166.61 (talk) 21:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Villette
Talk:Association of Free Lutheran Congregations

message: I changed the number of Canadian provinces to reflect that there is now an AFLC-Canada church in Quebec, as well as churches in Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia.  Also, I changed "auxiliaries corporations" to "auxiliary corporations".
Your section on 'Doctrine' is conspicuous for its lack of reference to the Apostles and Nicene Creeds and the Augsburg Confession.  Are you no longer Lutheran, then, but simply one more of the numerous American Protestant groups claiming the Bible as its sole rule of doctrine--whatever that means?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.199.50 (talk) 02:48, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Intel i960

message: I was on the i960 design team, wrote a compiler for it, ported UNIX to it, and later led one of the marketing teams.  Many of the edits to this page have been from people who have only read about the i960 (and the i432).  If you are going to expand the page, fine.  But there is a lot of misinformation about the relationship of the i960 to the i432 floating around, and I don't want to see it promulgated here. gnetwerker - 1/1/05 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7265 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 1 January 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Misinformation concerning i960 versus i432

message: This article leaves me with an impression that the i960 is not really in use to today.  AFAIK, the i960 is in use in many high end Adaptec SCSI controllers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.208.245.134 (talk) 23:00, 10 April 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are right. Is in fact rare to see a true hardware RAID-5 capable hard disk controller from any vendor which does not use the Intel 960. In fact even the cheapish Adaptec AAR-2400A raid controller uses the i960RS to drive a RAID-5 array of four common paralel ATA hard drives. This niche merits a mention in the article. 82.131.210.162 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.210.162 (talk) 10:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Link is dead, but here's a slightly older one: .  It's not clear whether the F-22 still uses the i960MX or whether it's transitioned entirely to PowerPC now. Cfmdobbie (talk) 19:24, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still in use today 

message: When I was doing i960 support for Intel in the late 90s, there was a rumor floating around about Windows 3.1 being ported to the i960CX and it vastly outperforming the i386.  The project was supposedly canned because "we're in the business of selling x86, not 960".  Can anyone confirm this rumor? Billbrasky 19:50, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumors 

message: I'm going to update a few of the sections including the processor variants, as it is missing a few keys things - like the SA version and HD version.  I would also like to add a simple table of the variants and key differences since they are somewhat unique for a given purpose.  Let me know if this does not sound like a good addition.  Sponaugle (talk) 02:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variant updates
Talk:Club-house

message: I came across this via the "random page" feature. It seems incongruous to the rest of wikipedia, so I searched for some key phrases in google. It appears to have come directly from The Mirror of Literature vol. 10 no. 285. Should this sort of source be cited? Is this typical for ebooks from Project Gutenberg? --Ghewgill 21:08, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: On April 20, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was merge and redirect.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Club-house for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 20:54, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:Fall Grün (Czechoslovakia)

message: The name of the operation was not Operation Grün, but Fall Grün, and it was a German military plan for an aggressive war against Czechoslovakia in summer 1938. However, because of the Munich Agreement, it was not carried out.
And as far as the March 15 occupation is concerned, I'm not sure whether it really was codenamed Fall Grün. But even if it was, the "original" Fall Grün from 1938 was far more important (March 15 was, in fact, just a necessary step before invading Poland).
I'll do some research and correct this article.
-- Sandius 21:52, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:Pulp (band)

message: For years, this article said that the band's first name was "Arabacus Pulp", referencing the biography by Mark Sturdy (2003). Now it says "Arabicus Pulp", still referencing the same work. Is this change based on consulting the actual book? At Google Books, I find both spellings, also in earlier works - e.g. this article from 1996 says indeed "Arabacus", not Arabicus, also "The Rough Guide to Rock", 2003. Access to the book by Sturdy seems to be restricted at Google Books, not even allowing searching the book / snippet preview, so I can't say whether Sturdy has actually "Arabicus" or "Arabacus". Gestumblindi (talk) 18:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it, the book is in front of me here, it says "Arabicus" throughout. Further evidence here - http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q276/james-errington/Sticker.jpg 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 05:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Then I'm going to change this over at the German Wikipedia, too. The misspelling "Arabacus" seems to be widespread... Gestumblindi (talk) 02:00, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabicus or Arabacus Pulp? 

message: Hi all. I originally put together the timeline of band members, a little under a decade ago, I think it was. A problem with this band is that they had changing lineups and delayed release dates - this means that the timeline is wrong, or at least very misleading, for the first three LPs at least. It, for example, features Simon Hinkler and not Tim Alcard - the timeline shows the reverse. Separations may well have been released in 1992, but it certainly is not a reflection of the band in that year. I set it up with recording dates rather than release dates for this exact reason, and I'm going to change it back. So if anyone wonders why this is, here is the explanation. 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 20:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline issues 

message: For years, this article said that the band's first name was "Arabacus Pulp", referencing the biography by Mark Sturd 41.164.142.202 (talk) 11:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  For years, this article said that the band's first name was "Arabacus Pulp", referencing the biography by Mark Sturd
Wikipedia talk:Proposal to expand WP:CSD/Proposal XI (Unimproved vanity articles)

message: Btw, can anyone point me to the page where the Wikipedia definition of notability is explicitly defined? --Sketchee 02:06, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
:The closest we have is Wikipedia:Importance, which refers back to some things that themselves aren't necessarily hard and fast policy.  Some problem areas are that Wikipedia:Informative has not been nailed down enough to get past being proposed policy, and for many the "potential interest" threshold seems to be far higher than 100 people. iMeowbot~Mw 09:19, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I'm not sure if everybody who is affraid of "abuse" of this is familiar with current situation. So - my experience:
Obvious vanities are only big vaste of time of those taking care of VfD. It takes time to insert the template, create the voting page, several people have to read the stupidity and do some research. Everybody agrees it should be deleted and after second or third day nobody cares and the vote is just watsing space on VfD page. This is the proper process, religiously following rules, and tiring for participants. 
On the other hand, several admins delete various stupidities in good faith and with common sense. This saves time and generaly helps wikipedia, but propably is beyond the intention of existing policy. (Usualy it can be justified by some "interpretation" - for example existing "vandalism" rule can cover hoaxes, more stupid self-promo vanities and thinks, because they are inherently inserted with bad intetion). Because in specific cases everybody agrees with deletion, there are almost no complains.
The problem is such deletion don't have safeguards, except the possibility to undelete. Thi way, it's quite propable once an admin in good faith deletes some hoax which in fact isnt hoax at all.
IMO insisting on too many time-consuming checks, and detailed objective definitions, and other obstacles of deletion of obvious vanities will not protect border cases in practice. Exactly the oposite - reasonable deletions are pushed out of the law. Without rules, errors ae propably more likely.
--Wikimol 20:58, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Too subjective, easy to abuse,..."

message: This is not standard situation, like voting vor deletion or other votings. Anyone can stop the deletion in case of any doubt. 
Chances blatant vanity which nobody cares for 3 days will become useful article are to my knowledge only hypothetical. I've never seen on VfD an article, which would be nomitad as an obvious vanity, recieved no keep votes in first 3 days, and later turned to be valuable and survived.
--Wikimol 21:20, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 3 days are pretty long
Talk:United Nations General Assembly Resolution 46/86

message: I do not see why this paragraph was added by  to the lead. The article is simply about a narrow resolution revoking a particular UN resolution. There is no implication that this means that the UN accepts Israeli policies more generally. I also do not see any WP:RS connecting the two. I have removed this as WP:OR for now. Kingsindian ♝♚ 10:51, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of "situation in the middle east" in the lead 

message: As far as I can see there are very few references to this, and this is primarily notable in that it was a revocation of an earlier resolution. Why does this article exist as a stand-alone? What does it add which is not covered in the other article? Kingsindian ♝♚ 11:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, there is very little here that is not already in the other article.  You should propose a merger, see WP:MERGE. Zerotalk 13:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have created a merger discussion here. Kingsindian ♝♚ 14:08, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article exist?
Talk:List of skinhead films

message: Do I put "movie" or "film"? some links are either. --Lex 13:08, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: what about film "Reggae" by Horace Ove
i don't see that at all, but i saw some movies on YouTube, it's a really greatest film about Skinhead music with a skinheads featuring (it's a documental film about music, i think)
:I've just added it, hopefully it stays up there, very good film.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.129.58.198 (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no Wikipedia article on the above film. Guy1890 (talk) 03:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  and what about... 
Talk:Secular Student Alliance

message: I have two concerns about the recent addition of the verbatim text of the SSA's misison statement (from ):
#it would appear to be a violation of their copyright. It might be fair use if it was quoted and referenced properly and put to some use in the article, but at the moment, it isn't. 
#it overwhelms the article and threatens its neutrality. --rbrwr± 22:45, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Two concerns

message: This article seems to me to be disturbingly biased in favor of the secular/humanist movement. I'm probably not the best person to edit it due to my own views on the subject, but I would appreciate someone taking a look at it.
Elijah Sight 18:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Note that "SSA owns the copyright to the image and has allowed for it to be reproduced."
vorpalbla  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.170.165 (talk) 01:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use information provided

message: Adding potential sources for developing and referencing article, as I find them. Incomplete. — Becksguy (talk) 00:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: This article is poorly sourced and should either be fixed or deleted. Much of it violates WP:OR  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihaveadreamagain (talk • contribs) 18:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cites are mostly primary cites from Secular Student Alliance website and press
Talk:Autoimmune disease

message: The section causes is a copy of part of the introduction section. George Albert Lee (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem was that in the body of the text, most of that was not about causes, it was a list of examples/types. I shifted those two sentences to the Examples section and renamed it Types (someone with medical knowledge can fix that to a better word if types is not right). Boud (talk) 10:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same paragraph appears twice  

message: In the introduction section it says that there's at least 80 types of autoimmune diseases, while in section causes it says that there's over 100.George Albert Lee (talk) 19:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent numbers  

message: The article reads "Chemicals, which are either a part of our immediate environment or found in drugs, are key players in this context. Examples of such chemicals include hydrazines, hair dyes, trichloroethylene, tartrazines, hazardous wastes, and industrial emissions."[39]
However, that link contains no such info. Therefore, the paragraph rally has no literature backing it. There is some connection of Parkinson's to chemicals, but you would then need to explain an autoimmune aspect of that.
Tero111 (talk) 00:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemicals etc. as cause 

message: — Assignment last updated by JMR2024 (talk) 20:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Amin Jenna Deep Explore
Talk:Bookstore

message: Places to verify that Barnes & Noble College Bookstores, Inc. (B&N College) is not owned by Barnes & Noble, Inc. (B&N Inc.). The Chairmen of B&N Inc., Leonard Riggio owns the controling interest and is the CEO of B&N College.
Hoovers Search. 
Barnes & Noble College Booksellers, Inc. is a privately held company, which operates college bookstores at more than 500 institutions of higher education including: Columbia University, California State University at Los Angeles, Yale University, University of Pennsylvania, and the Coops at Harvard. (From B&N College Website)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbonnie (talk • contribs) 02:50, May 7, 2006
:The Barnes & Noble College Bookstores article says they're not affiliated, but this article still says they are. NeonMerlin 19:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. --Orange Mike 19:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Barnes and Noble Infomation

message: I have an issue with any bookstores claim to be the largest/biggest/grandest/etc. I have looked at several articles that make some claims regarding store size, but have not found a single 2nd party reference (see WP:V and WP:CITE); therefore I have pulled the reference from the page. If someone has a list of stores by size, then by all means add it back. In lieu of a true list, anything else seems like advertising. Srice13 04:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest / Biggest Bookstore