lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Omega Directive

message: While this relatively small concept in Star Trek is not very important. It was a Red Link in an existing Star trek  Prime Directive Article.  I used some of the information from that article to create the Omega Directive page I included extra information, and Hopefully now that the page exists super nerds who have read all the Star Trek books will be able to contribute more information.  Which is what this is all about. I believe that the Omega Directive page should continue. —This unsigned comment was added by Dmcmahon (talk • contribs) .
.So what? Right now there are three small articles all about the same subject. This one and the voyager episode about it, and the article about the omega particle itself. Now, if you look at those articles, you can see that this article can easily be merged/become part of with the omega particle article. Request that this article is merged. 62.194.170.62 18:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, all three articles should be at the episode page. A reference from Prime Directive is valid, but three small articles about something that occurs in one episode is overkill. Memory Alpha can have all the fine-grain detail it wants. -- nae'blis 05:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:User WikiProject Square Enix

message: Hey, sorry to JiFish, but I didn't really like the new choice of logo. It showed up on everyone's userpage instantly and it's a bit less subtle than the other one. Sorry, it just really stands out. If I'm out of line, please revert and flame me, I didn't mean to offend. — CuaHL 22:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a fork Template:User WikiProject Final Fantasy2 --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 18:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project user template picture
Talk:Norbert Schedler

message: Good for the University of Central Arkansas for having a professor whom someone feels compelled to write so much about, but bad for wikipedia that this overblown biography pays so little attention to the man's research, whatever it has been on, and assuming it meets wikipedia's standards for academic relevance. I can think of literally dozens of professors I've known in Arkansas and elsewhere in my academic career who are quite quotable and even devoted to educational service, but who don't have wikipedia pages. So much gristle here, so little worth. Goth Fatty X (talk) 04:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entry amounts to hagiography and calls for a rewrite 

message: Rewrite or deletion? I'd say old Norb probably wrote a good deal of this himself. Drunkencorgimaster (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreed 

message: I am pretty sure though I know which former student wrote it. The Honors community is pretty tight knit. It does need some edits and could use more of a focus on his publications. He really did reshape UCA as the academic school vs the U of A party circuit. I happened onto this today, but I will ask the Honors committee if there is anyone up to the edits.Sirromyesdnil (talk) 05:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nah, If Dr. Schedler wrote it, he'd have caught the plural women in the part about his wifey.  

message: Beyond being an apparently popular educator in a regional state university in America, how relevant is he?  His publication record seems adequate but modest.  I can not help but wonder if this Yank does not belong on "Rate My Professor?" rather than Wikipedia perhaps?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.144.6.66 (talk) 17:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance
Talk:Tripoli Agreement

message: Well, with the recent rebel attack at the Battle of N'Djamena, Chad has broken off all relations with Sudan. Can we consider this Agreement nullified? Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 21:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. KI 03:14, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

text: * Added but the briefest mention of the above to the article. Please correct, expand, etc. David Kernow 22:06, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tripoli Agreement thrown out the window? 

message: This page cannot be a good article anymore because:
*It is not broad enough (debates are not covered, compromises are not included)
*The cited sources are biased (debatable)
*The article is full of red links.
*There are no images (but many images would be ideal for the article)
*The article has a pacifist point of view. 
--GoOdCoNtEnT 07:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article 

message: There is another Tripoli Agreement signed between the Republic of the Philippines and the Muslim rebels in Mindanao. --Bentong Isles 23:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig
Talk:Arso Jovanović

message: This is an interesting article with good information. I suggest some copy-editing would make it easier to read. Dunstan 22:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given that he wasn't even 40 when he died, how did he die?  He doesn't sound like he was ever a Communist, and I can't imagine that Tito's Yugoslavia would have been a terribly hospitable place for him after the war. --Saforrest (talk) 23:38, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good guess: he was shot while attempting to escape to Romania. GregorB (talk) 00:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death?
Talk:Quackerjack

message: I noticed Quackerjack's origin Story is very similar to B:TAS verison of Riddler as well, though I'm not certain if chronologically that Riddler could've been another influence on this character.
No, neither does any of the othe speculations. He is just a clown type of villain like the Joker, the Trickster, Punch & Jewelee, the Harlequine, the Prankster or the Clown (flash) that uses toys like them or the Toyman.--T-man, the wise 20:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Okay, unless I'm mistaken, there was no evidence in the series that his toys were dangerous before he went out of business. Should this be changed? 70.245.178.89 16:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He was once a toymaker who was run out of business after the video game market expanded, but more because his toys were so lethal no one in their right mind would buy them." 

message: I had read the interview in question and Tad Stones never said Quackerjack was his least favorite character - only that he was "disappointed" in the way he turned out. I've changed the article's wording slightly to reflect this. 
I meant to say this in the summary of my latest edit, but somehow wound up saving the changes before I could. Sorry!
66.64.233.238 (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oops! - Tad Stones Interview
Talk:The World of Narue

message: Ok, I don't know if anyone knows anything more about this than I do, but...manga volume 5...it is listed on Amazon as having a release date in May 2005, but is listed as out of date (this entry is where I got the ISBN when I put it on the page).  However, CPM's site does not have a volume 5 listed.  Also, I just saw that there is an unnumbered World of Narue manga release listed on amazon for June 302006 with the 'same ISBN as the listed volume 5 (this also isn't on CPM's website).  So, I was wondering if anyone knew whether 1) whether volume 5 was actually ever released before, and, what is this new release that is supposedly coming out in June (a volume 5 that was never released? volume 6? neither?)  I'll see if I can research up on ita anymore FleetAdmiralJ 02:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I found the answer myself.  No, volume 5 was never released.  It was scheduled to be released in 2005 along with volume 4, but CPM stopped printing manga through 2005.  Volume 4 was released in January 2006, and Volume 5 is scheduled to be released in October (a 9 month release cycle is rather long, but apparently CPM's manga production is still getting back on it's feet - and i think because of that, one should stress scheduled to be released) FleetAdmiralJ 22:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga Volume 5 

message: I've been adding some information on characters and I think now might be a good time to split the page up a bit for clarity.  We could segregate the characters by class (main characters, friends, Machine Clan, Narue's Family) a la the Japanese page.  We could try splitting the character, episode, and issue information off into separate pages like the Fullmetal Alchemist English pages, although I'm not sure there's enough subject matter to really justify that.  Or we could use a hybrid system, with main character, manga-only character, and anime-only character sections that are themselves subsectioned into class of character.  At any rate, we probably can't add many more characters to the current list before it becomes too unwieldy.  What say you? Sleet01 (talk) 07:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Character Clean-up
Talk:Fundamental (Pet Shop Boys album)

message: Is it necessary to keep the originally-announced track listing?  The final track list has the same twelve songs, just re-sequenced in a different order... seems a bit redundant. -- eo 12:27, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. It seems to be misleading people, even (so at the very least it needs to be moved below the actual track listing). Anyone else? –Unint 21:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agreed so moved it down last week. I think it's important to keep the original tracklisting. Jonks 10:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original track listing
Category talk:Paper-and-pencil games

message: I don't know why, but I can't add Connect6 and Renju to the list. 70.111.251.203 22:40, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're primarily board games. I've added a note to this category saying that many board games are playable with paper and pencil. ··gracefool |☺ 00:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Can't add articles
Talk:Nas, Foxy Brown, AZ, and Nature Present The Firm: The Album

message: I aint heard this film but looking at the cover why do they copy the Godfather, it is the mmost overrated shit ever that film. Theres a few bits thatre ok but its mainly crap so why does ever one copy it??? --Big-piggy 17:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Godfather 

message: This is a good idea.  I just searched the firm and found a UK group.  No slight to their fame, but I was looking for Dr Dre et al.  Separate the two and/or give a disambiguation heading for the UK band.  Maybe they are more famous, I'm from the US so I only know Dre, Nas, Foxy, AZ and Nature's project.  There are definitely less prolific musical artists on this sight.  Give The Firm their due. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jack Acid Society (talk • contribs) 05:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group And Albulm Seperate Articles 
Talk:I Am... (Nas album)

message: There is a shoutout to Jay-z and Memphis Bleek on the linear notes, check it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.226.110.159 (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jay-Z 
Talk:Nastradamus

message: The Rolling Stone review that this page links seems to gives the album a NO STAR rating. Is this deceptive?. That's why I have twice changed the stars graphic-thing next to the link. Thesean43 20:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rolling Stone Review

message: I know Shoot Em Up is a christmas paradoy, but I can't remember which Christmas tune it samples... does anyone else know?
--Memphis10 21:32, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoot Em Up 

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. Chicago Tribune (Baker, Soren. 14. November 28, 1999) review of Nastradamus (1999):
Dan56 (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicago Tribune review 

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. USA Today (Jones, Steve. 08.D. November 23, 1999) review of Nastradamus (1999):
Dan56 (talk) 01:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA Today review 

message: As it says on the article, most of the originals for NaS's albums turned out to be released on I Am... On my version of Nastradamus, at the end of The Outcome, Hate Me Now is included and the album ends like that...now, I believe that this might have been intentional for later releases of the album since I downloaded this about last month from a friend. However, I haven't found any evidence or sources that it was supposed to be there. I was thinking that the person I got this from accidentally edited in there, but I highly doubt he edited it at all since it is a iTunes Store Rip. I wanted to add to the article that some versions might include the song, but I'm not exactly sure if anybody else even does...The Outcome Is supposed to be 1:54, and mines is 6:58. Should I just ignore this or include that on the page (I'm sure a citation would be needed anyway)? 
What more can I say? (talk) 01:48, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hate Me Now 

message: Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa...where is the endless criticism this album recieved. Let it be known that this album was notoriously percieved to be terrible. No nas fan bias.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.15.109.78 (talk) 13:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let it be known 
Talk:The Lost Tapes (Nas album)

message: its feud. uh, i didn't know where this goes and couldn't do it myself. whatever.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.54.244 (talk) 05:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'fued' - wat 
Talk:Street's Disciple

message: This page needs to have a layout like most other album pages, (i.e. columns for song name, produced by, featured artists, etc.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.156.133 (talk) 01:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Final Fantasy VI

message: This page is a category, belonging to an appropriate subcategory - but also is a category for the game of the same title.  The purpose appears to be to allow the sound track music to be linked the game by title as a category. 
Extrapolation:  If this category page as subcategory method works, we will have a subcategory for every video game with music made. IamM1rv (talk) 16:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nature of category
Talk:Crunk Juice

message: Crunk Juice is also an energy drink marketed by lil' Jon so If any of you want to make that article go ahead if not, I will in my free time. --Damien Vryce 19:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crunk Juice 
Talk:List of operas by composer

message: This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... not recently created and a useful resource --Smerus (talk) 10:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :The opera corpus. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 10#The opera corpus until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The opera corpus" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Final Fantasy spin-offs

message: there is only one spin off here. There are no spin offs other than FF mystic quest. the rest are just sequels. I'll remove the sequels.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequels 

message: Please insert Dissidia: Final Fantasy into this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.56.189 (talk) 16:21, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissidia: Final Fantasy
Talk:Apologies to the Queen Mary

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 17:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: <^>v|This album is connected|v<^>
Talk:Michael Morales

message: I think his date of death, February 21, 2006, should be left out until he officially dies.  Also, I don't understand why it said his birthdate was placed as September, when the number 10 signifies October.  TripleH1976 02:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't it true that the informant whose testimony got Morales put onto death row claimed that he and Morales discussed the crime in Spanish, and the fact that it later turned out Morales couldn't speak Spanish is what made his appeal and its subsequent refusal more publicised?  I'm basing that on an article in The Guardian on monday. 86.20.231.125 16:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable evidence 

message: It says "Morales has been convicted of murdering 17-year-old Terri Winchell on January 8, 1981, a crime to which it is claimed he has confessed. Winchell was in a love triangle with a cousin of Morales, Richard Ortega, and another man. Ortega asked Morales to kill Winchell so that Ortega could have exclusive relations with his lover. According to prosecutors, Morales attacked Winchell from behind and tried to strangle her with his belt." It is not clear to me from this passage whether Ortega is a necrophiliac, or a homosexual, and even if it weren't for the ambiguity, either possibility seems unlikely enough to warrant explicit clarification on its own. A5 14:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused by introduction 
Talk:Benthic zone

message: Can you tell more about it?
I am researching it and want to know more.
--Sam Wang 21:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a section about nutrient flux. Factors are really going to depend on the depth, but overall they will be uniform when you get into discussing marine snow because it is decomposed on the way down and eaten by any larger organisms in the water column, as well as smaller ones like salps and crustaceans. When it's relatively shallow it's just going to be large detritus. Esoxidt•contribs 15:41, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk More 
Talk:WPBT

message: I have moved this article from WPBT-TV to WPBT. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact WPBT. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 22:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: According to the reference originally given, it was implied that WPBT and WTHS shared time with each other since signing on in 1955 until 1979. However, it was not until the late-1960s when the two stations began sharing the same frequency -- I have a 1962 TV Guide (Southern Florida edition) that lists only WTHS, not WTHS and WPBT separately or even "WPBT/WTHS". The reference originally used here makes no mention of the station's past history. Could anyone find a page that includes the history of both stations (other than WPBT's official site, which does not mention WTHS at all)? -- azumanga (talk) 19:01, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shared time with WTHS: history? 
Talk:Rarities (1978 The Beatles album)

message: At the beginning of the article says "The album was released November 2, 1978 in Britain", in the Infobox December 2, 1978...
-- Just a Beatles' Fan, Diegotóteles in Spanish Wiki.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.174.16.228 (talk) 22:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date
Talk:Past Masters, Volume Two

message: A non-user is insisting on removing LP info from this article so I'm requesting semi-protection. Steelbeard1 17:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1980s was the last decade in which albums were widely available on LPs.  The 2-LP Past Masters compilation was the final Beatle album released widely on LPs and came out the same time as the early British LPs in the USA were issued on LPs.  Again, Past Masters was issued on LPs and widely available when LPs were sold.  Record stores stopped stocking LPs around 1990. Steelbeard1 18:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for semi-protection 

message: I've added Trident to the recorded locations; Hey Jude was recorded there.
Apepper 17:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added trident to recorded locations 

message: (first two messages copied from user talk)
You're doing a great job with the tweaking, PEJL.  I did catch one problem with the Past Masters, Volume Two article.  Because the LP version was released as a double LP combined with volume one, the side numbers on the label are side three and side four.  The record label photo is included in the article to back up that fact. Steelbeard1 23:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Regarding Past Masters, Volume Two, I noticed that discrepancy, but I don't think the fact that the sides are listed as "3" and "4" on the album necessarily means that we should label them as "Side three" and "Side four" (any more than if they were labelled "X" and "Y" on the album). I think "Side one" is the best way to refer to the first side of Past Masters, Volume Two. Otherwise there wouldn't be a first side of Past Masters, Volume Two, which would be confusing... --PEJL 23:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess for the sake of consistency, we should follow standard Wikipedia formatting.  What if we prefaced the track listings saying the LP label says '3' and '4' on the double LP combined with Volume One? Steelbeard1 11:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a plan. I'll do that now. --PEJL 11:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it side one/two or side three/four? 

message: Due to issues with the Double LP sleeve in the article Past Masters, Volume One, I have spun off the Past Masters double LP into a separate article titled Past Masters, Volumes One and Two. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Masters double LP spun off into separate article
Talk:Live at the BBC (Beatles album)

message: Switched "Soldier of Love (Lay Down Your Arms)" to being by Arthur Alexander, 'cause it is. 24.222.65.225 17:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the remasterized repacking of november 15 has 25 tracks on disc one and 36 tracks on disc two, one more track by each disc  
new tracks
disc 1
17. What Is It, George? (Speech)
disc 2
36. From Us To You (Closing) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.202.246.125 (talk) 13:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  more tracks 
Talk:The WB 100+ Station Group

message: Are any of these "fictional" call letters used by real stations, or have they been reserved?  Morwen - Talk 22:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The FCC has no recognition of these fictitious call signs. Sometimes, they do get assigned to real stations (e.g. KWBT is in Tulsa, Oklahoma, but there is a WB100+ channel KWBT in Eureka, California). These call signs are made up by the channel owners purely for marketing purposes. Though I'm sure that in most cases they probably try to avoid conflicting with real call signs. DHowell 05:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Update:  What I find most interesting is the apparent omission of Savannah in the CW's plans. 67.150.93.80 21:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another update:  This claims that "none of the Pappas deals involve CW Plus," but that supposedly includes KWBL and KWUB. Clarification? Morgan Wick 06:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future of The WB 100+ 

message: I removed WRWB, which had been added by an anon a while ago. I have done my own research and, contrary to the anon's claims, WRWB doesn't appear to show the WB 100+ schedule. Between the Daytime WB and WB Primetime, or from 5 to 8 PM, WRWB shows hour-long blocks of The King of Queens, Will and Grace, and Sex and the City in that order. By contrast, WFWB, which is most definitely part of the WB 100+, shows the Bernie Mac Show, Yes Dear, and The King of Queens. Will and Grace and Sex and the City air after primetime. The equivalent 10 PM-midnight time on WRWB is taken up by That 70's Show and South Park. Neither one of those shows airs regularly on weekdays on WFWB. In my view, if it shows the WB 100+ schedule it's WB 100+, if it doesn't it's not; thus there is no "controversy" whether it is or not. Morgan Wick 22:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WRWB]] 