Talk:Smaug

message: Any relation to the Romanian dragon zmeu?
:Slavic_dragon might tell. --DLL 16:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Zmeu

message: Is there more that can be said about Smaug? Almost certainly. I believe that Tolkien drew a picture of Smaug, so that should be mentioned. There should also be something about Smaug's voice and his cunning. The article also needs rewriting to reflect the plotlines better. As for secondary literature about Smaug, there should be some things that can be quoted and referenced, hopefully including something comparing Smaug with dragons in mythology and other stories (both by Tolkien and by others). I'll see what I can find, unless someone else finds stuff first. It should also be possible to list several of the more notable artworks of Smaug that are used in editions of 'The Hobbit'. Also, there have been numerous plays done of 'The Hobbit', so some mention of Smaug in relation to those should be possible. The disambiguation hatnote at the top is an example of Smaug inspiring uses in popular culture, so that would be a good start to a "popular culture" section. The portrayals could also mention the two radio versions of 'The Hobbit'. All this should help address the "in universe" concerns expressed here. Carcharoth 09:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These books and these essays will no doubt provide more than enough information to fully flesh out this article. And, Sandpiper, if you did not cite your sources, the editor who removed your edits was perfectly within his or her rights. WP:CITE and WP:NOR are quite clear on this. — BrianSmithson 17:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a close reading of Smaug compared to Miðgarðsorm, the slaying of Fafnir by Sigurð, and the dragon killed by Beowulf, in J.R.R. Tolkien: Author of the Century by Tom Shippey, pp. 36-40,  --zippedmartin 04:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said, there is a danger that these guidelines a written would entitle someone to delete everything. Sandpiper 01:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential expansion of Smaug 

message: If memory serves me, wasn't the thrush in fact Gandalf?--Snideology 00:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. TCC (talk) (contribs) 07:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrush 

message: Actually, while I'm here, I think I'll just move the "abilities" section closer to the beginning rather than the end, so that it follows on from a reference to the character in the plot rather than a section on how Tolkien thought of his name.  Not050 (talk) 01:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swap 

message: I'm wondering what other sources are needed for this now.  We've found the Beouwulf link, and the other facts surely come from the book itself.  Not050 (talk) 15:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and verifications thing 

message: How exactly may I ask was Smaug the main antagonist of the story? He had an antagonistic role but in The Two Towers, Grishnakh has an antagonist role even though Sauron and/or Saruman are the main villains. I read the book again recently and the way I see it the Goblins are the main antagonists. After all they are met with more than once and the book's climax takes place in a fight against them. -- Flashpenny
:In the same way that The Lord Of The Rings is about the battle against Sauron, the Hobbit is about the battle to remove Smaug. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 11:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Antagonist? 

message: I don't think the phrase, "original Dalish" is appropriate describing Tragu as an alternate name. The reference is good, where it's made clear that Smaug is Tolkien's Common Tongue interpretation of the name Tragu used in Dale. The folks of Dale didn't speak "Dalish" (such a word never exists in Tolkien) but a Northern dialect related to the Common Tongue that isn't specifically named. However, since "Dalish" is a language of elves in an unrelated fantasy universe I don't think that using that word here is appropriate (and wrong if that is the intent). I suggest the reference be changed to something like, "native name in Dale." That removes any and all possible confusion. 71.126.134.205 (talk)mjd  —Preceding undated comment added 02:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dalish???

message: The article exists (Forbes_Fictional_15) and is referenced textually, so should be linked. 
69.95.203.145 (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Forbes Fictional 15

message: Should Smaug not be considered a "wyrm" rather than worm in the first paragraph. I always read dragons referred to as wyrm or drakes. I know it's about a fictional character, but still...
User:CharlieP216  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.206.119.7 (talk) 17:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No. It's a quote from the book, he's described in The Hobbit as a Worm. GimliDotNet (talk) 18:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Worm?" 

message: I tried to upload a picture of Smaug as it appears in The Hobbit film trilogy, but I couldn't, because I do not have the ability to uploadf inages on Wikikipedia.Could you upload this picture for me?This picture can be found on site One Wiki to Rule Them All or The Lord of the Rings Wiki specifically on the Gallery page about Smaug. You will see it. See Smaug/Image Gallery.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.86.255.196 (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Help

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Smaug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150622155404/http://institutodelapatagonia.cl/index.php/analespatagonia/article/view/685/650 to http://institutodelapatagonia.cl/index.php/analespatagonia/article/view/685/650
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'm fairly certain that Tolkien felt that Smaug (and dragons in general) had four limbs in addition to the wings. This isn't clearly shown in Tolkien's illustration of Smaug, but the two limbs seen are articulated and located just like forelimbs. 
This means that Peter Jackson's depiction isn't faithful to the books.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.182.135 (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four or two legs? 

message: I was told his name was etymologically connected to the word smog. The Mo-Ja'al (talk) 02:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: By whom? Lava Lamps (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's no connection. The real etymology is in the article. Smugan=to creep through a hole. Whereas: Smog = Smoke+Fog. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: It feels like bad writing that Smaug is described as a dragon twice in quick succession.
I cannot think an acceptable change though, anyone have any ideas?Lava Lamps (talk) 21:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Sentences  

message: Hello  & Co. Today I made edits to the article to use  for the two quotes (instead of tables) and to correctly mark up the other two tables (the cool literary comparisons) for WP:ACCESS. Unfortunately, my edits were reverted on the basis that, "it was better as it was!"
I'd like to you to (1) reconsider this revert, as it breaks accessibility of the article, and (2) explain why you think it was "better". I assume part of your rationale is that you are a sighted user and don't use a screen reader. Such users have to struggle with our pages when they are not properly marked up (such as the current version of this one). And there's no good excuse to use a single-cell table for anything, as you seem intent on doing with each of the quotes.
My changes were aimed at adding the correct and missing markup (e.g. scope="row"), and helping the tables respond dynamically no matter what device or browser the user is employing. We can't know how wide the user's screen is (or if they're using one!), so we should leave maximum flexibilty in things like line breaking.
Would you please consider reverting your revert? Thanks, — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 10:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whatever. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:43, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of tables and [[WP:ACCESS]] 

message: His colouring doesn't seem to be mentioned in the article - though the line "A vast red-golden dragon." is present in the Hobbit when they first sight him. Might be worth mentioning EdwardLane (talk) 11:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A vast red-golden dragon."