Talk:List of SIP software

message: I have removed Gizmo Project from the list of SIP clients since it only allows to connect to the Gizmo Project network. I feel this makes it useless for anyone that will look at this page. I'm not sure if Jajah should be removed for the same reason (never used it). --Chealer 05:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Gizmo

message: Why not merge this whole list with the Comparison? --Hm2k 01:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you'll find that SIP is a VoIP protocol. --Hm2k 04:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: SIP is not VoIP protocol. You can send over session any data: IM, Video, Files - there is no limits in SIP.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sipexpert (talk • contribs) 17:30, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Comparison_of_VoIP_software

message: I started changing external links to internal, per WP:NOT#LINK.  I'd appreciate help both with the link conversions and checking the internal links.  Thanks. --Ronz 17:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll help by doing one section at a time so we do not overlap. Calltech 19:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Linkfarm

message: This list is becoming nothing more than a collection of non-notable orgs. (with only a few exceptions).  Its been tagged as SPAM for months now. Lots of SPA's simply adding their company or products.  I nominated it for Speedy Delete, but that was removed.  Recommend paring it down similar to List of commercial voice over IP network providers, where only orgs with WP articles remain.  Comments? Calltech 13:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The list is definitively no "collection of non-notable orgs".  But, do we really need both, the Comparison of VoIP software and this, beeing a subset of the other?? It is correct, SIP is not only a VoIP protocol, but we could rename "Comparison of VoIP software"
--Kgfleischmann 13:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that 80% of the orgs listed here do not have WP articles and would most likely fail to pass WP guidelines, by WP:ORG definition they are not notable.  And it appears to be simply a collecting area for users to add their own projects or orgs.  I do agree that a merge of articles makes sense, with a purge of many of these non-notables. Calltech 14:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Consolidation or Removal

message: I fail to see the difference between SIP "Communication products", and "SIP servers".  It seems like the two sections can be merged, and I should think that "SIP servers" is a better name between the two. -Verdatum (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: I need to ask the editors of this article to review and acknowledge the different Mobicents/Red Hat products as separate SIP servers, because they are very different independent projects with (mostly) different developers and target markets. It is confusing at first, but if you take a deeper look at the technology it will make sense. First, Mobicents is just a bundle of many different telco servers (SIP, Media and others) than can work independently of each other and have standalone releases. Now, Mobicents JAIN SLEE with SIP Resource adapter is a SIP server that can execute JAIN SLEE applications. Mobicents Sip Servlets is another SIP server that can execute Sip Servlet applications (which is very very different from JAIN SLEE SIP applications, the only common thing is that it's that they are both Java). Mobicents Sip Servlets alone is the counterpart of Sailfin from JBoss. Sip Servlets and JSLEE server do NOT share any entry-points when deployed together. Further, JBoss Communications Platform is the name of the a Red Hat-branded product, which is based on the Mobicents Platform bundle, but it's built on top of the Mobicents platform by adding features and services, which again from user POV is very different (and paid, even though it's still open-source).
:Write an own article for each server has and we can do it! --Kgfleischmann (talk) 04:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobicents 

message: It's to be added Skype for Sip, maybe
http://www.skype.com/business/products/pbx-systems/sip/
I don't add it because it's better before to understand well how it works. And I don't know enough about Sip
--SkZ (talk) 21:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be some kind of gateway software. Before adding it, we should have more information, independent reviews ans so on. --Kgfleischmann (talk) 22:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skype for SIP 

message: Bink is GPL, this is why it is free and opensource. NOT "non-free and opensource".81.173.171.230 (talk) 10:50, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blink 

message: The article is marked with . What sort of improvements are we looking for? It seems that most of the burden of referencing should be on the linked articles. ~KvnG 23:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: My "likely" (?) conflict of interest prevents me from adding the following SIP software to this list (Note i have no conflict of interest related to SIP software):  
*MizuDroid SIP VOIP Softphone.  Free softphones for non-commercial usage and softphones for a fee with extra features.
*Zoiper IAX SIP VOIP Softphone. IAX and SIP softphone application for voip calls.
Elmwoodie (talk) 20:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a list of of software with Wikipedia articles, we don't place external links here. - MrOllie (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  other SIP software for the list