Talk:Economic history of Argentina

message: 3 years after Delief called for reorganization and this topic has yet to be addressed.  The entire article needs a major overhaul, a decreased reliance on POV statistics published in the CIA Factbook, and a serious increase in citations.  There are a number of quotations directly from either books or politicians that are completely un-cited.  This article requires serious work.  If no one addresses it within the next few weeks I will take the duty upon myself. Bellfazar (talk) 02:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs a massive overhaul

message: It's lower now as is the poverty index  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.126.236.40 (talk) 09:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: why isn't the unemployment rate updated?

message: Poverty line is now 25%. Could someone look up the new numbers and update the table?
I'm adding a 'needs attention' template message to this article. It needs major topical reorganization. It borrows heavily from the CIA World Factbook. A seperate 'History' section might be useful.  Delief 19:10, Dec 26, 2004 (UTC)
It is incredibable that wikipedia doesn't cover the recent developments in the economic sector in argentina, since the CIA is not a really credible source in this game it needs serious attention by some local activist groups who are part of the changes going on. (a reader)
:I hope this is better now. I've done what I could; the CIA might be credible with respect to numbers but it's not neutral regarding other things.
:I'm going to replace billions by thousands of millions throughout the article, in order to avoid the ambiguity of the word, and to make it internationally neutral (1 billion = 1012 for everyone but Americans and now also British). (I would sincerely prefer to talk of gigadollars if the word was in wide use.) --Pablo D. Flores 19:34, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: Could the author of the economy table template (Template:Economy of Argentina table) check the numbers and denominations? There's data in the BCRA. I think they're more or less fine, but the public debt is stated as more than 500,000 million dollars (that's what $ stands for), and that's not the case. It seems $ was meant to mean pesos. --Pablo D. Flores 19:47, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrade in Economy table 

message: I've touched a few things here and there, reorganized the sections, and moved a couple to separate articles. Things to be mentioned or expanded in this article or its children, off the top of my head:
* Outsourcing (call centers are popping out everywhere, nascent software industry maybe trying to emulate India?).
* Analysis of the recent inflationary trend.
* Imports (not specified anywhere; the INDEC groups them in very broad categories).
* Main industrial complexes (soy, oil, autos, etc.).
--Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:03, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization and expansion 

message: Current policies are a touchy issue. I've just removed this...
:Mr. Kirchner administration policies gear to more state control on the economy. On March 2006 he nationalized previously privatized water and sewage services. Continuous monetary expansion is reigniting inflationary expectations.
... since I believe it's more an editorial piece than a fact. Kirchner did not nationalize anything: the government withdrew concessions from private companies. "State control" is a very broad term and suggests massive interventionism. Monetary expansion does not imply inflation, and it's only some people who claim that expanding the economy produces inflation. The monetary base has in fact decreased lately, as you can easily check, so in fact what's really meant by those analysts (you know who) is that paying higher (decent) salaries to low- and middle-class workers who lost purchasing power during the devaluation is bad, while e. g. lowering exports taxes is good...
... None of which should go into the article. In short, I suggest that we stick to dry figures and indisputable facts (for example, "the government has withdrawn the concessions of X and Y, and the state has re-gained control of Z and W services, though there are plans to re-privatize Z"). Plus all the sources (references to press articles) that are needed.  --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 17:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only were the citizens disbelieving the 9% inflation rate; so were the economists. A recent article published by The Economist explained that Argentina recently set up a variable "method" to calculate inflation, whereby if an article in the price index suddenly rose "sharply" in price, it was removed from it, allegedly because "it ceased to be representative of what people buy". According to the same article, the economist calculate inflation to be over 30%. The article is found here. --the Dúnadan 15:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Oh, and as a side note, monetary expansion, does produce inflation (Eco 101: increasing the supply of money; leaving demand and supply of goods and services unchanged, produces an increase in price). --the Dúnadan 15:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current policies 

message: I done an updated to the economic table, i used this one because its widely used in other economy pages and i though it would be good to keep and standard through out the economic country section —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ckill (talk • contribs) 23:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrade in Economy table 

message: Here can be viewed a ticket to a recent major motion picture, apparently purchased in Argentina for $8.00 ARS (a little over 2.50 USD for activities/services that normally go for around 8-11 USD). knoodelhed (talk) 22:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purchasing power 

message: Maddison, Angus. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective--cited at http://www.cei.gov.ar/revista/06/parte%204beng.pdf does not say that.  Any reliable source to confirm this assertion? Codik (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "One of the richest countries in the world in the early 20th century" 

message: I saw in the history page of "Talk:Economy of Argentina", that the aforementioned discussion page has been moved here, so I think I should discuss here about the article "Economy of Argentina". If that's not the case, tell me so and I will delete my section and post it at the discussion page of that article.
In the section "income equality" of the article, it says textually that "The social gap is worst in the suburbs of the capital, where beneficiaries of the economic rebound live in gated communities, and many of the poor (particularly illegal immigrants) live in slums called villas miserias.". If I'm not mistaken, there is no such a thing as "illegal" inmigrants in Argentina, only undocumented inmigrants, since the Constitution states as its purpose to secure the blessings of liberty to "all men of the world who wish to dwell on Argentine soil". In fact you can verify that in the Wikipedia article about Illegal Inmigratrion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration#Argentina). I don't know who added the illegal inmigrants phrase arround parentheses, since the citation link that is used to verify that paragraph doesn't even mention the word. The statement in parentheses about "illegal inmigrants"  should be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.125.89.95 (talk) 05:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Illegal" inmigrants? 

message: From the colonial economy section: "nor established native civilizations to subject to the encomienda" ... "feudalist society, based on work relations such as the encomienda". As the first one is unsourced, I would suggest its removal. This one too: "Milcíades Peña consider this historical period as pre-capitalist, as the production was destined to overseas markets" ... "agriculture and livestock had little to do with foreign trade, as the output was principally consumed by the producers themselves and by the small local market". Presumably in the former case it refers to either a later period, or a different kind of (non-agricultural) exports. For the sake of clarity, it should be specified.--Frère Jacques (talk) 02:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion about the economic system is about the Spanish America in general, not about a region in particular, but I thinks it adds valuable information (after all, this article is about the "economic" history, not plain or general history, so the more economic things we can add to it, the better). The difference of foreign trade or closed economies can be noted more clearly comparing coastal cities, like Buenos Aires and Montevideo, and cities inside the country. Coastal cities traded with the European powers (either legally or by contraband), while the others made things for themselves, contact between cities was slow. Cambalachero (talk) 00:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Apparent contradiction

message: When a certain book is used more than once, just at different pages, it's not needed to include the full cite book template as reference in each case. It is better to list the book in a "Bibliography" section, and then each reference should be the surname of the author and the page, as in "Ferrer, p. 22". In the long run, the reference section becomes more ordered and legible. Cambalachero (talk) 15:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: This article is about a specfic country, not about international economy as a whole. We don't need several sections "list of country by..." figures. By the way, they are all unreferenced. Cambalachero (talk) 02:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely, they have no place in this article, if the IP keeps adding them after four different editors have reverted him, he should be blocked.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 05:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  International rankings 

message: Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 15:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Peer_review|Peer review]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Economic history of Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120525120813/http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20101221-712914.html to http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20101221-712914.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Dr. Veiga has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Veiga has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Ari Aisen & Francisco Jose Veiga, 2010. "How does political instability affect economic growth?," NIPE Working Papers 5/2010, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Veiga's comment on this article 

message: "By 1950, Argentina's GDP per capita accounted fell to less than half of that of the United States." Is "GDP per capita accounted" a technical term in economics, or is this sentence improperly edited?  If the former, an explanation or a link would help; if the latter, then the sentence should be edited, perhaps deleting "accounted." Kdammers (talk) 02:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean? 

message: The content only goes up to around 2018.  What has happened since then? Kdammers (talk) 02:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating needed 

message: please, could you please stop the "black leyend", Thank you for pointing out the historical accuracy.
The term 'colonies' might not be the most accurate in the context of Spanish possessions in America. Instead, terms like 'viceroyalties,' 'captaincies general,' and 'audiencias' would be used, depending on the specific administrative structure of each region.
For example, in America, Spain established viceroyalties such as the Viceroyalty of Peru and the Viceroyalty of New Spain (which included Mexico and parts of Central America), as well as captaincies general and audiencias. These entities had a considerable degree of administrative and judicial autonomy, though they were subordinate to the central government of Spain. 188.85.154.250 (talk) 07:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Colonial" doesn't exist for the Spanish territories in America