Talk:Spin glass

message: This article needs some rewriting. It should be structured into a section on experimental facts and another on theoretical findings, i.e.: replica symmetry breaking, TAP equations and all that. I may do it when I find the time... Javirl 15:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Restructure

message: I realize that the subject matter of this article is pretty specialized, but it would be more encyclopedic if it was made a bit clearer to people with no background in physics. It took me a few reads of the first paragraph even to get a basic idea of what a spin glass is. Manderr (talk) 17:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I rewrote the intro; hopefully it's comprehensible now. -- Beland (talk) 15:07, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: Plate nickel on fluoride-frosted glass.
Oxidize the nickel.
Protect that with phosphate.
I just had a brain fart that tells me this ceramic material might be useful for something, but whether it's a magnetic recording medium, a phosphor, or a polarized reflector for some specific frequency of light totally eludes me. I really don't have the equipment to do it. For all I know, you could run current along a strip of it and get light out of the perpendicular. Brewhaha@edmc.net 07:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phosphate-Coated Nickel Plate on Frosted Glass 

message: How do you spell this correctly? The article constantly switches between these 3 possibilities. --85 [?!] 23:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've standardised all occurrences in the prose to spin glass, per the title of the article. Brammers (talk/c) 17:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spin glass, Spin-glass, or Spinglass?

message: This needs to be explained with more clarity.  Is it saying that something like the enthalpy of fusion happens at the freezing temperature? -- Beland (talk) 15:18, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ergodic means that all states are visited/distributed equally: e.g. the Bernoulli process of a coin toss is ergodic. Non-ergodic means .. they're not. It is usually measured with the participation ratio which is vanishing when ergodic (e.g. high-temperature) and is of order unity when a glass (low temperature).  Roughly speaking, the participation ratio counts the number of states that "participate" in the ground state. Someone should add this to the article. 162.204.250.21 (talk) 00:57, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

text: Oh, here, let me quote: "We  decided  that   the thing  to  do was  to ignore  the  spatial ordering,  that  is, to  neglect  the  long-range  ordering  of  spins  in  space,  if any,  and  instead  to  look  for  long-range order  in  time.  Richard  Palmer later  named  this  concept  "nonergodicity"  because  it  means,  when  present, that  the system  does not  explore all  possible  states  in  the  course  of time.   As  the  measure  of  long-range order in time, we introduced  q, which is  the  average  correlation  between  a spin S,  measured at one time and  the same  spin  measured  a  macroscopic time  t later.  The equations  are ..." 162.204.250.21 (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-ergodic behavior 

message: I think this was originally proposed as a very specific theoretical transition within a generalized Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model of a spin glass. There are some indications this is more broadly applicable  but it's not really clear to me how much. As it stands, the content of gardner transition would easily fall within the scope of spin glass, but might not if the article was a more complete treatment. I'm proposing merge here partly to get visibility for an orphaned article, and to better define the scope to see if merging is a good idea. \langle Forbes72 | Talk \rangle 16:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Gardner transition merge