lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frankie Crocker

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  💵Money💵emoji💵💸 18:03, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Fred Freiberger

message: That's the word used when a series is cancelled after Frieberger is brought in to save it. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 01:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the term 'Freddied' be mentioned? 

message: This article, like too many on here focuses too much on Star Trek, as if that's the most important thing anyone ever did. In the case of Frieberger, who have a 40+ year film and TV career, to focus narrowly on a single year of producing Star Trek fails to adequately or accurately address the subject. I am rewriting the entry to get the broader focus such an entry needs.
MrNeutronSF (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Star Trek PROBLEM 

message: People seem obsessed with blaming this guy for their favorite TV shows being cancelled. Please stop putting in phrases like "it can't be denied no other tv producer has had so many sci-fi shows cancelled on his watch." What does that really have to do with anything but your own spite for him? It can't be denied no other sci-fi producer didn't get his pilot spec scripts picked up than Gene Roddenberry, but you don't see phrases Iike that in his article. Freiberger produced three sci-fi shows that were cancelled during his run, that's really not inordinate if you take the sci-fi qulifier out, he just happened to work more in this genre than other producers of his era. The fact that all three shows had poor ratings by the time he signed on seems lost on people. 67.190.86.13 (talk) 08:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop slandering
Talk:Fred Marcellino

message: This article is about a noted book cover illustrator.  It contains two examples of his work, which, being book covers, are non-free images.  User:SchuminWeb has twice removed them, implying, without any supporting argument or other discussion, that they could somehow be "adequately described textually in this context".  I disagree with this unsupported claim, and have restored the images.  —Mark Dominus (talk) 12:52, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book cover images 

message: Marcellino won at least two of the four U.S. National Book Awards for jacket design: the first and last, 1980 and 1983, we are missing 1982. (Graphics awards, 1980 to 1983 only)
--P64 (talk) 03:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Book Awards
Talk:Fred Russell

message: Please explain
Please explain why this wiki article about Fred Russell has been flagged. It is simply a summary and short bio of one of the most decorated and influential sportswriters of the 20th Century.
It is filled with facts and documented awards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Relax777 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has a "glowing" tone and isn't NPOV.  However, as a longtime daily reader of Mr. Russell's work and someone who has met him, owns a copy of I'll Go Quietly and was generally in awe of him, I'm hardly the one to correct it.  It nonetheless needs a thorough edit.  75.200.28.192 (talk) 05:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article has stood for years, poorly written and largely unsourced. Russell is certainly deserving of better writing. I have been through it briefly and only scratched the surface by removing weasel words, unsourced attributions and blatant editorializing puffery. I'll start working on it and I encourage others to lend a hand. Eagledj (talk) 13:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have rewritten this largely-unreferenced article, thrown out unsourced content (or found sources), removed non-NPOV tone, and added images.I have tried to bring it up closer to Wiki standards. I welcome any suggestions. Eagledj (talk) 15:29, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Article improved
Talk:Belridge Secondary College

message: I have assessed this article for class and importance. The feedback is as follows: More topics and refs required.  Welcome .... Victuallers 10:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Fred Spiess

message: I plan to do some simple upgrades first: Add Wikilinks and some citations. Then rearrange the order of some sections of text. Also, add a photo I have of Spiess now in Commons. 
The next phase would be to expand content covering activities at SIO. BrucePL (talk) 22:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  upgrades to Spiess page 

message: Seek approval to remove flags now at top of this page. BrucePL (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of flags on this page
Talk:Frederica de Laguna

message: The article erroneously states that the Inugsuk excavations in NW Greenland (where de Laguna accompanied Danish archaeologist Therkel Mathiassen in 1929) had to do with the Norse. This is incorrect. The excavated site belonged to a Thule-derived Inuit culture dated by Mathiassen to the fourteenth century AD. The finds included a stave-built wooden tub and a small figurine in what appeared to be Mediaeval European costume, suggesting that the occupants had been in contact with the Norse colonies further to the south, Mathiassen named the culture "Inugsuk" after the site. Mathiassen published a paper on the excavations in the "Meddelelser om Gronland" series, but the essentials may also be found in de Laguna's "Voyage to Greenland".--Death Bredon (talk) 21:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathiassen and Inugsuk
Talk:Battle of Stow-on-the-Wold

message: Hi I started this page and if any one has anything to add or knows how to add the battle to the battle box please go ahead.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas Hall (talk • contribs) 10:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Started page

message: In the second sentence of the section "The battle", the link to River Avon needs to be disambiguated - I guess it should be either River Avon, Warwickshire, or River Avon, Bristol. I'd do it, but it's late and my geog. is not up to it without dragging out and squinting at my atlas. Smalljim 22:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which River Avon? 

message: * English Civil War battlefield 'may be in wrong place' BBC 24 May 2010
* Calls for Battle of Stow Civil War site to be surveyed BBC 6 April 2011
-- PBS (talk) 13:29, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battlefield monument may be in the wrong location 

message: This blog posting Canadian Content » Canadian Forums » Themes » History » Stow-on-the-Wold battlefield may be in the wrong place was posted by Blackleaf; May 26th, 2010 at 12:39 PM. Now usually with blog posting long after a Wikipedia page is created it is obvious which way round the copyright is. The trouble in this case is the wording seems to be an improvement on what we have here and it includes more details, so I am wondering if it is a copy of a source that was used to create this article.
The thing that first alerted me this was our sentence "Finally, Astley sat down on an ancient cross monument in the square and declared ..." which beggars the question to whom was he talking? The wording in the blog is "Finally, the defeated Astley sat down on an ancient cross monument in the square and declared ...", the word defeated improves the sentence and explains to whom Astley was speaking.
The blog page has a fairly comprehensive aftermath section which our article lacks. This lead me to look at the other paragraphs and the similarity is quite striking. Here is a diff between our wording and that of the blog. -- PBS (talk) 14:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation but which way?
Talk:Darkened Room

message: Nothing the article says about the Japanese woman actually happens. That woman only talks about her friend, e.g. saying she's in a dark room crying. She doesn't talk about bananas (lol) and doesn't show her Tokyo apartment to anyone.
Lepaca Kliffoth (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm... yes she does. I think you watched another film. Cop 663 (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bananas: you are 
Talk:Frederick Vanderbilt Field

message: In reviewing some of the sources used here and in the article on the Institute of Pacific Relations I found a number of statements which are misleading or in some cases wrong. Since the tone of both articles is hostile, I think that we need to be careful to avoid appearing biased.
In the first paragraph, for instance: Field said that he was never a member of the CPUSA as such, but "I suppose I was what the Party called a 'member at large.'" Field From Right to Left p. 169. 
Likewise, the source in note 7 for "thoroughgoing Communist"  is a review of Field's book, but the book itself should be used -- Field is quite open about his beliefs and activities. John Thomas, Institute of Pacific Relations (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1974), after examining the Congressional testimony, comes to different conclusions about specific episodes mentioned in the article, while still holding Field responsible for ignoring Stalin's crimes until Krushchev's 1956 speech (Field in his book says that he "uncritically accepted" Stalin's word).
If anyone else is working on this article, I would be glad to post more instances, but I will hold off making any changes for a while. ch (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed revisions 
Talk:Ghostwood

message: The text has been copied and pasted from the film's advertizing. The introduction's reference to Irish myth, which I am removing, is unjustified.  Though set in Ireland, I see nothing particular to Irish mythology about it. 75.15.115.245 (talk) 10:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Irish mythology 
Talk:Frigyes Hidas

message: Is "Biography and list of works from Hungarian Radio" (http://kincsestar.radio.hu/ktz/hidas/) available? --220.102.66.200 (talk) 07:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Fritz G. A. Kraemer

message: Mae Brussel, contends that SS Fritz Kraemer and US Army Fritz Kraemer are same person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:A1C9:D300:8CA2:A8E9:7A07:853F (talk) 00:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SS Fritz Kraemer 

message: I want to contact the son (Sven) or daughter of Fritz G.A. Kraemer. Can somebody help me, please?
My mail address is ingo.althoefer@uni-jena.de--79.199.180.77 (talk) 10:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son or Daughter - contact 

message: According to German WP did both his parents convert to Christianity before his birth. This should be reflected in the article. Escpecially as Fritz never spoke publicly about these roots.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.147.154.30 (talk) 13:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish Parents
Talk:Fritz Spiegl

message: Hello, I came across this lovely story http://www.culture24.org.uk/places+to+go/north+west/liverpool/art18870 about Fritz Spiegl's Loophonium being added to the collection of the Walker Art Gallery in Liverpool. If anyone's watching this page, would it be relevant to mention this, as a citation, in the paragraph about his popular parodying of classical music? Disclaimer: I work at Culture24. Thanks very much! RosieClarke (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely, feel free to add a mention. Is there any chance of having a non-copyright photograph, please? Rob (talk) 13:11, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spiegl's Loophonium 

message: "Every Saturday, for eight years, Spiegl would discuss such matters as...": Where did he do this? In print, on t.v., down the pub? Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Every Saturday
Talk:The Barracudas

message: What happened to the audio-file "Barracudas - Summer Fun excerpt.ogg"? Moved? Never uploaded? --EarthFurst (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I uploaded it ages ago (2006?) but the 'Copyright Police' wanted it re-tagging. Instead of just doing it themselves, they left a message on my talk page. As I uploaded quite a few files with, what were for the time, unusually comprehensive fair use rationales, I rather thought they were taking the piss. As a result it was deleted - and I no longer contribute .ogg files to Wikipedia. Thanks for the interest though. Regards, Ian Dunster (talk) 21:11, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a link  to a video of them performing "Summer Fun" on Top of the Pops back in 1980 (the 1981 caption's wrong BTW) on YouTube. What a Great pop single! The person introducing the clip is former Radio 1 DJ Steve Wright.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 20:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I remember the song "Summer Fun" had a brief revival in the early 1990s as it was used as the theme tune for Children's BBC summer holiday broadcasts during the Toby Anstis era sometime between 1992 and 1995. I'm fairly sure it got a re-release at the time off the back of the CBBC usage. Kelvingreen (talk) 12:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's BBC revival
Talk:Fidel (2002 film)

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: This seems more like a review than a wiki-article.
--Sibajaleoaj (talk) 21:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  neutrality
Talk:Gail Fisher

message: Gail Fisher was married three times.  
https://books.google.com/books?id=oDcDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&dq=gail+fisher+married&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjiuLauje_NAhUL6mMKHQHlADcQ6AEIHjAA#v=onepage&q=gail%20fisher%20married&f=false
The second husband was actor Robert A. Walker, married and divorced in 1973.
https://books.google.com/books?id=GLEDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&dq=gail+fisher+married&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjiuLauje_NAhUL6mMKHQHlADcQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=gail%20fisher%20married&f=false
https://books.google.com/books?id=MkMDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA57&dq=gail+fisher+divorced&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiC6PKfjO_NAhUW4WMKHT37BH4Q6AEILjAE#v=onepage&q=gail%20fisher%20divorced&f=false
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1755&dat=19730524&id=PJwcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=v2YEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6920,3807822&hl=en
Zabadu~enwiki (talk) 23:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life 

message: Article says: “She became the second African American woman after Nichelle Nichols of Star Trek to show prominently on weekly television.”
Wrong. She was the third. The first was Cicely Tyson, who played social worker George C. Scott’s secretary in 25 of the 26 episodes of the series “East Side / West Side”, 1963-64. And of course we’re only talking about dramatic series. Several sitcoms had black women in the cast going back to the 1950s. 74.104.189.176 (talk) 00:05, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  third not second
Talk:Garman sisters

message: The comparison with the Mitfords strikes me as straightforward original research. Unless it can be adequately sourced, it should just be cut. Charles Matthews (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Magnificent Seven cemeteries

message: I'm removing the link to "poets buried in the magnificent seven cemeteries" as it links to someone's myspcae without any relevance as far as I can see.  If I've missed something crucial, apologies, but it seems like a sly ad to me... EdwardMackay 12:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Is it desirable to set up lists of people, listing the occupation they had and where they were buried?
Should this be for the Magnificent seven or all of the UK?
--JHvW (talk)  22:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of people buried in the Magnificent seven
Talk:List of Islamic educational institutions

message: In the Iran section of this article, there is several university and institute that they are not Islamic or has no Islamic course. i suggest to remove them from the list. like Amirkabir university, this is a technical university not Islamic one. Kheyzaran (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove none Islamic Institutes and universities

message: I suggest the creation of 2 pages. One for Islamic institutes which are seminaries (mostly the Jamia'at) and another for non-seminaries (University based religious education). (Jalal0 (talk) 07:51, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Create 2 pages

message: Hello,
I was wondered why Iran's Islamic educational are absent?
Kheyzaran (talk) 16:05, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Iran's institutes are absent? 

message: Merge the List of Members of FUIW to the List of Islamic educational institutions as a section. Kutyava (talk) 08:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 13:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[List of Members of FUIW]]
Talk:Belbury Poly

message: I believe that there should be a separate personal biography page for Jim Jupp. I created a full ref'd article on the Jim Jupp page but the editor changed it back to a redirect page because The Belbury Poly page was previously (and I think erroneously) a perosnal/biographical page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bobbyspiral.   the Belbury Poly page refers to his band and their releases only and his other activities are out of the scope of this page.Bobbyspiral (talk) 19:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate biog page fro JimJupp 
Talk:Pilot (Day Break)

message: I have rated this article as start class because of the lack of sections other than plot and as low importance because individual episode articles are not of high importance to the project as a whole. I based my assessment on the guidelines here. To improve this article try to add sections on the production, significance and reception of the episode and cut down the plot summary.--Opark 77 10:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment
Talk:Geoff Edrich

message: His close fielding skills should be mentioned.   One of the great pleasures of watching Lancashire in the early 1950s was to see Ikin, Edrich and Grieves fielding in the leg trap to Tattersall, or in the ring around the batsman for Hilton or BerryDelahays (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Bibio

message: In the infobox, there is an "Associated Acts" entry with a link to Boards of Canada.
Is Bibio actually associated with Boards of Canada? I do not see anything else in the article that speaks to this. He did remix a track of Boards of Canada, but that does not warrant being considered an "Associated Act". Should that line be removed from the infobox? 
Gardaud (talk) 02:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Associated Acts
Talk:Geoffrey Dummer

message: For anybody who wants proof, here it is:
*scan of a letterhead
*photo of me and my sister at Geoffrey's gravestone
I hope to add more detail about Geoffrey soon, when I get round to reading his scrapbooks and newspaper clippings. If anyone wants to talk, please, contact me. Thanks, --rjcuk 21:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence for photograph and Achievements text 

message: This section was removed by 82.16.7.63 at 04:01, 3 August 2007. 
In the UK of course, Dummer's groundbreaking ideas were derided and dismissed, and no finance for further development was available by either private or public finance. This was similar in occurrence to the ideas of Barnes Wallis' Swallow, or the technology of the Whittle jet engine.
I would personally try to think of a way of putting this back in, because it is true. The UK government weren't interested in his ideas so they didn't provide funding. It's a real shame, really. --rjcuk (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Propaganda 

message: The claim made in the introduction that Dummer was the first person to conceptualise and build an IC is blatantly untrue. It is far more accurate to instead emphasise that he was the first person to speak widely on the prospect of integrated electronic circuits.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSNW8FRJ (talk • contribs) 11:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading claims in the introduction
Talk:Geoffrey Jenkins

message: The article currently gives the above as 1993. The First UK Edition (HarperCollinsPublishers 1994) states "Copyright (c) Geoffrey Jenkins 1994". While the UK's may well have not been the First Edition, copyright dates 
sometimes predate the First Edition, but (in my experience) never post-date it. Does anyone have a reference for 1993? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 46.65.174.71 (talk) 16:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication date of A Daystar of Fear
Talk:Gaza Strip (film)

message: Moved from User talk:Malik Shabazz. If others think this should be completely deleted, I'm ok with that. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you explain what this has to do with me? Can you also explain how a 5 day old account knows Mike V, KTC and myself? Do we know each other from a previous account of yours by chance? Chillum 16:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: From the block log of Malik Shabazz--Avner Kushner (talk) 16:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, why did you ping me? What does this conversation have to do with me? Chillum 16:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Since all of you blocked Malik Shabazz, I figured you guys are impartial.--Avner Kushner (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Administrators do not mediate content disputes. You have none the less got our attention. Chillum 16:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from [[User talk:Malik Shabazz]]
Talk:Geoffrey Kirk

message: I am told by people who studied with Geoffrey Kirk at Yale in the late 1960s that during this period he spent one semester at Yale each academic year, and one semester still back at Cambridge each academic year. Thus in the information box on the right hand side of the page, under "Academic work" and "Institutions", the first appointment at Trinity Hall, Cambridge should not end at 1965 but should extend through the period 1950-1970 (perhaps 1971?). 76.116.104.233 (talk) 16:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. I think it's best to get rid of the years all together because a) they're not usually included in these articles and b) they seem to be wrong, too. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)