lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lora concentration camp

message: Removed this section b/c Gregory Ilich is not a credible source.  Also, when I reviewd his article in order to trace back his sources,  the descriptions of abuse were not footnoted as to their source.  
Have thus removed the the section.
Also removed the reference to concentration camp.  This prison was tiny in comparison to Abu Graihb, and thus the changing of the reference to concentration camp sounds a little WP:WIKI#NOTBATTLEGROUND.  iruka 13:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your explanation for why you removed sounds like original research to me.  Please do not remove the cited text. // Laughing Man 05:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  What part of Gregory Ilich doesn't have sources for his claims i.e. can't back up what he says do you not understand.  If we were talking Amnesty Intnl, then it would be a different case.  But we are not, we are talking about a Serb partisan writer.  iruka 14:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The part where you are trying to debunk what he is claiming.   You can't claim that he can't back it up, you must find a source that says that. That article does seem to have plenty of references  but that's besides the point. // Laughing Man 15:36, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment of Prisoners
Talk:Lora prison camp

message: This prison camp article, while describing a place where horrific things happened, need to present a neutral point of view. - If I have time in the next week I'll do some editing, but please leave the tag in place as it is very one sided at the moment - Peripitus 11:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NPOV|point of view issue]] 

message: The article neglects recent developments that have seen a retrial & convictions of camp gaurds.
Article needs extensive cleanup to conform to NPOV.
For NPOV, refer Manjača concentration camp as an example.
croatian_quoll 18:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ante Perkovic, please be civil. Negative pigeonholing of contributors will not help us achieve a good article. Please don't inflame the POV war on articles like this. - Peripitus (Talk) 03:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I rephrase it. I hope this is better. --Ante Perkovic 08:29, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted back NPOV tag 

message: Edits like this  do not belong here. Wikipedia is not a forum nor a wall for graffitis. Kubura (talk) 02:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacock terms
Talk:Savane

message: I removed #REDIRECTGNU Savannah as Savannah is something else than Savane.  --Vincentt05:06, May 27, 2006
:Nice first step, but there were no follow up steps.  This has been a stub ever since you made it.  It was proposed for deletion, and I saved it, but now I see I shouldn't have.  I'll much the tiny bit of content into the GNU Savannah article and return this to the redirect it successfully was. Gronky 14:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Die Redirect! 

message: I'm not sure that the sentence "The Savane code began life as a fork SourceForge 2.0." is correct english. Shouldn't it be "fork of SourceForge 2.0."?  --Goatrider 04:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar Fix? 

message: The last sentence was wierd. I've changed it (see history), but since I don't know much about the subject, someone else could verify I got i right. Jorge Peixoto 21:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last sentence
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force

message: IP over Avian Carriers concerns joke RFC 1149 about using pigeons to carry packets. Should a photo of a dead pigeon be added (diff) as "An example of packet loss"? Please edit the article or comment at Talk:IP over Avian Carriers#Dead bird photo. A month ago, I semi-protected the article (now expired) and would like to stay uninvolved. Johnuniq (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP over Avian Carriers 

message: :Category:Computer networking articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 07:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Computer networking articles needing expert attention]] has been nominated for discussion

message: Are any of these redlinked terms previously mentioned in  potentially notable. See Template talk:Area networks#Wanted Pages? ~Kvng (talk) 04:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wanted pages? 

message: Here's an abandoned draft on a potentially notable network topic if anyone wants to take it on ~Kvng (talk) 19:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:Tranalyzer]] 

message: Hey there,
I'm drafting an infobox on IoT. [Many] additions and corrections would be welcome.
Cheers,
François Robere (talk) 17:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Left some comments at User talk:François Robere/sandbox/Template:IoT ~Kvng (talk) 15:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:IoT
Talk:Rebound (basketball)

message: lets not just put our favorite big men on our team  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloodkillas (talk • contribs) 19:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Rebounders

message: The section on boxing out was merged from a separate page per this AfD discussion.  That page now redirects to this one. Xymmax (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boxing out section 

message: How about something like this? []  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.240.86 (talk) 07:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's a problem then just change it commons:Category:Basketball --  DasRakel  ✍  12:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about an apolitical picture? 

message: There should be a section added to the article discussing rebound rate, since it is probably a more telling statistic of a player's effectiveness on the boards than rebounds per game is.Hoops gza (talk) 15:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Rebound rate]]

message: I think in the first section, someone forgot to add that rebound is count after you collect the ball from a block shot. I'll add that. Prince Azulay (talk) 16:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebound after a block shot 

message: What two others are saying here seems to jibe with what I'm seeing on the internet- a player who gives his team possession by deliberately tipping the ball to a teammate is credited with the rebound.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.79.11 (talk) 16:46, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  controlling vs. possessing
Category talk:Organic farming

message: :Category:Organic agriculture seems to be very similar to this category, I think it would be more helpful to have one category instead of two. --Salix alba (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the word that includes both, farming and gardening is agriculture. I think we should use :Category:Organic agriculture, what does the rest of the people think? --Cacuija (my talk) 17:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can you please follow up the discussion here, thanks. --Cacuija (my talk) 18:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from Category:Organic agriculture

message: Why isn't this category Organic agriculture?--ELLusKa 86 (talk) 11:07, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the category
Talk:Jiminy Glick

message: That quote at the bottom of the page is actually Stewie from Family Guy in a bit where he's making fun of Jiminy Glick. -davecool 5/26/06
It's been removed now. -davecool 6/2/06
I just watched an interview by Skip E. Lowe, who appears to be the obvious inspiration for Jiminy. Yet I see no mention of Skip in this article. Does anybody know if Martin Short has ever mentioned him as an inspiration for the character? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.246.130 (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "He also says he was given the nickname "Jiminy" as crickets laid eggs in his anus." Is that really a part of Glick's "history"? It's been a while since I saw the show, but that doesn't sound like the kind of humor I remember. PurpleChez (talk) 20:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism? 

message: The bit about crickets laying eggs in his anus is not footnoted... and sounds a bit more "potty humor" than I would have expected from Martin Short. Can this be verified? PurpleChez (talk) 20:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional biography
Talk:Brussels-South railway station

message: Brussel-Zuid is the Dutch name, and the station deserves a Dutch name just as much as a French name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evilbu (talk • contribs) 10:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And vice versa, a choice has to be made. You can if you wish and for research purposes type in Brussel-Zuid. Not both can be used as it would be utterly confusing, either a double unappropriate name like Gare de Bruxelles-Midi/Brussels-Zuid or this. Captain scarlet 17:39, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is being discussed here... Julien Tuerlinckx 18:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brussels is bilingual, either a double title, or in English? 

message: I honestly wonder what this entire discussion is all about. Midi means south. Zuid means south. The name Brussels-South is hence not incorrect. It might not be the name mostly used by the locals, but given the bilingual identity of Brussels one might wonder if there is such a thing as a name for this station mostly used by the locals. Brussels-South is not a mistranslation, nor a totally different (or wrong) name for the station. See it as a little extra information: people looking up this article instantly see what the stations name means. For findability, both Gare de Bruxelles-Midi and Station Brussel-Zuid (or Brussel-Zuid railway station, as this seems to be more common with Belgian stations with a Dutch name) should be redirects to this article. Problem solved, or rather, there never actually was a problem in the first place. 109.131.172.246 (talk) 10:14, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Brussels South is described as an official name. This is contrary to the information on BelgianTrain.be, the official website.http://www.belgianrail.be/en/stations-and-train/search-a-station/1/BRUSSEL-ZUID%20%20BRUXELLES-MIDI.aspx Blaiserandpascal (talk) 06:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the fuzz?
Category talk:Law enforcement in communist states

message: Hi there. To the best of my political analyst knowledge, there's nothing really specific in "law enforcement of communist states". It's much more about totalitarian/non-democratic states since every each "communist" state is or was essentially totalitarian. So this category should be either replaced or at least supplemented by a :Category:Law enforcement in totalitarian and authoritarian states .AlexPU 10:43, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong subject

message: Communism is stateless, do not confuse it with Socialist State, which is a temporary institution. Bolegash (talk) 02:49, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma

message: It seems that the Paseo District is listed twice here:
*Paseo Neighborhood Historic District
*Spanish Village Historic District (The Paseo)
They both at least point to Paseo Arts District. Are these three districts the same thing? Dsmdgold 15:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Paseo District
Talk:Sennen Cove

message: I've removed the 'photo required' tag from here, since I added a photo of Sennen Cove - but its not a brilliant pic. There must be better out there. --JimChampion 23:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:United Services College

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Stub on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: This school no longer exists, and there's no more than an unreferenced definition here Adam McCormick 22:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment|Assessment]] as of March 2007
Talk:Golden Gate, Kyiv

message: Is Viktor Hartmann's project for the Kiev gate really related to the Golden Gate? I doubt in this. Here is his design, and I can't see any part looking like the photo of the Golden Gate. --Yms 11:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. --Ghirla -трёп- 13:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Looking for information on "The Great Gate of Kiev", I kept being redirected back to Modest Mussorgsky's "Pictures At An Exhibition".   In fact, I was coming FROM there, trying to find information about the gate itself.
In thirteen different editions of Mussorgsky's piece that I've looked at, the name in his final movement of the place where the gate resides is spelled "Kiev".   In this article it is spelled  "Kyiv".  Quite likely, this is why my search kept being redirected back in a loop.
It is not my intent to quibble over the spelling.  I merely wish to point out that *IF* the place name is going to be spelled in two different ways, then BOTH spellings need to be referenced in BOTH articles, so that follow up searches are properly directed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect fix needed
Talk:Bedford High School, Bedfordshire

message: ----
Somebody has been mucking around with this page.  The Prince of Darkness never visited the school, and there has been no World War III.
Would someone please revert it to be accurate, or else revise it?  I don't have the knowledge to do it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.211.166 (talk) 18:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Bedford Modern School

message: ----
Where exactly is the Harpur are of Bedford? A decade at that school (the last year before girls) and i never heard of it.
Frankly I'm shocked the marketing department havn't got their claws into this page yet...
----
started alumni-tick... pics? refs? Could be a B... Welcome Victuallers 19:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: assess

message: Editors interested in this topic ought to consider a separate article for the notable alumni. (And they should remove those alumni who do not have a WP article).  – S. Rich (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni – suggestion 

message: There is a disagreement between two Wikipedians about the year Bedford Modern School was founded: 1566 or 1764. I have to say that the assertion of 1566 doesn't seem to have much to justify it. The school came into being in 1764 and celebrated its 250th birthday in 2014. The School did not exist before this.
To tie the foundation of the School to the origin of the Endowment is insufficient and leads to a Reductio ad Absurdum in that it implies all Harpur Trust schools, Bedford Girls' School and Pilgrims Prep School, could also claim to have been founded in 1566. The Harpur Trust was established to endow the Grammar School, no other school was envisaged at this point. 
I'm an O.B.M. & I've no wish to upset anyone but I think 1764 is correct and should stand. Ndstead (talk) 23:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was B.M.S. Founded
Talk:Dame Alice Harpur School

message: Start class, good information for a smallish article. Need references to get a higher rating. Mid importance for its strong history links. Twenty Years 16:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:Cheam School

message: Needs a lot of work to raise the standrard try an info box some titles and a history with references Victuallers 18:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *1963-1970 Michael Stannard
*1971 Much loved Deputy Head, Joe Comber, takes over for two terms after Michael Stannard's unexpected departure late 1970 *confirmation needed
*1971-1998: Christopher Evers
DavidC Surrey (talk) 09:22, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing head Michael Stannard 

message: Martin Harris was headmaster after Mark Johnson 2016-2021
2A00:23C8:8314:6601:25E5:153B:8F35:EB27 (talk) 10:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Head
Talk:Bradfield College

message: assessed by Victuallers 11:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hum. Pretty sure somebody is going to delete this section as cruft, or original research, or something, sooner or later. But I feel I've already played the censor on this article enough, and isn't healthy for one editor to do this alone. So I won't. 
In the meantime, if you are the (anon) author of this section, I'd suggest you take a look at some other articles, and see if you can express the same information in a more encyclopaedic way. -- Chris j wood 10:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Student’s Low-down on the Houses (2006) 

message: Another private school page that reads like a dismal apology. Amazed there isn't more on their academic results. This page really needs rejigging.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising 
Talk:Reddam House, Berkshire

message: started alumni??... pics? refs? infobox Welcome Victuallers 19:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: assess

message: I have tagged the article with "recentism" as there is very little (nothing, really) about the school's history as the Merchant Seamans' Orphanage. Tacyarg (talk) 02:02, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Have removed this as it has been resolved. Tacyarg (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing info?
Talk:Imperial Service College

message: Is "The Royal Horse Guards Light Aid Detachment Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers (LAD REME RHG)" one body?  If not, does it need one or more commas?  Are the abbreviations in the right order; and, in any case, why are they there at all?  81.131.31.196 (talk) 17:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Horse Guards, etc.
Talk:Pangbourne College

message: :pics? refs? Victuallers (talk) 11:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

message: The controversy section probably shouldn't be in the article; it just seems to be two incidents, and the rest - such as the reputation, which is unreferenced, and the "unofficial policy", for which the only source is an unofficial interview - is not verifiable. Even the incidents are probably not notable or relevant enough to be mentioned - one is the arrest of a student (who was released without charge) and the other incident did not occur at the school or in the local area. Peter E. James (talk) 19:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 

message: This whole article is far too detailed. Parts of it is written like a prospectus for the school, and much of teh history section is unencyclopaedic. ----Ehrenkater (talk) 15:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I will try to help with this. SovalValtos (talk) 16:20, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too detailed 

message: Wording referenced by ISC is being removed as it is not independent "We are tasked by our members to protect and promote the sector in everything we do." SovalValtos (talk) 08:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent Schools Council 

message: Some recent editing shows detailed personal knowledge of the school. One, perhaps Hesperus 'Binnie', who is named in the section 'Notable Old Pangbournians' as editing the page, seems to have done a lot of research. The concern is that there is too much without references and some material would seem to be better placed in the school prospectus or an old boy magazine.SovalValtos (talk) 10:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Pangbourne Diction Section, looks like original research, and will be removed if no suitable source is addedSovalValtos (talk) 19:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Many of the entries in the section 'Notable Old Pangbournians are not verifiable and will be removed if references are not forthcoming.. SovalValtos (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If the OPs are notable then they will be covered in places that are not the school's own material. Wiki requires sourcing from significant independent coverage, and in WP:RS please. No such coverage means they are not notable. SovalValtos (talk) 21:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prospectus style 

message: The brand names of equipment in use, whether of mowers for the cricket square, balls for rugby, pianos for music or the tailor of uniforms is not relevant to the article. Advertising is not required. 86.23.18.215 could usefully add explanation for edits.SovalValtos (talk) 17:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brand Names 

message: A few more images could be usefully added to reflect some of the unique features. SovalValtos (talk) 23:20, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Bristol Cathedral Choir School

message: Impressive alumni (if short) old school Victuallers 19:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I found at least one hoax entry under the list of former pupils, so I've added tags to the other entries, and also removed the Will Tuckett entry, since there was no support in the reference given, and he's supposedly from Birmingham.  Rambotwits (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a little evidence about Sophie Anderton "briefly" attending the school in 1993. . It's not clear who Neil Andrews refers to. There is no citation on the James Averis article, but he was born in Bristol apparently. Nothing for Raymond L. Brett. Edward Thatch appears to be another hoax entry, since the article itself on this man says "little is known about his early life". Julian Close has no article on him, so may not even be notable. Russ Conway is referenced to a book source in the article. William Draper was also confirmed using the reference in the article. Ben Farrow does not seem to have his own article yet, so I've removed that entry. Rambotwits (talk) 00:33, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax entries in the list of former pupils
Talk:Wycombe Abbey

message: "Wycombe Abbey is one of the most famous independent girls' schools in Britain." This needs a reference or evidence to back up this claim.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.26.205 (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is some rambling talk about a freehold in the article. It seems to come from the staff of the school.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.26.92 (talk) 10:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We are also told about "the mood of the era".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.26.92 (talk) 10:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rambling 

message: There is no history of the school. Maybe the school needs to the seperated from the Abbey? Victuallers (talk) 10:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The school?