lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neuticles

message: I made some additions to the article just now to include some facts and.or statements about Neuticles that can be suported by references from other than the manufacturer's website.  I feel this helps document their popularity.  I also found one endorsement from a Spay/neuter organization and included that.  I have been unable to find the APSCA's endorsement despite searching for it.  I would like to include a link to their site or any of their publications so that the endorsement can be verified and documented.  I don't doubt that it exists, I just would like to include it so that other editors don't come by and delete it as an unverifiable statement.LiPollis 22:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Veterinary Council of Ireland has determined that the use of such implants is not in the best interests of the welfare of the dog and their use is considered to be unethical.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJames9797 (talk • contribs) 17:04, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions to article

message: Also referenced in Weeds season 7 Episode 11 by Andy as he puts on the personae of an investor at Doug's party in the Hamptons.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.135.33.38 (talk) 13:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:50, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Muster (Texas A&M University)

message: For some reason the official Texas A&M Traditions website is different than the Aggienetwork website which can be found at: http://clubs.aggienetwork.com/emeraldcoastamc/muster.htm
They both state different conflicting fact about when April 21st became the official day, and when certain traditions were started. -- Hut101 07:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite Needed

message: I'm unsure that this meets notability guidelines.  Do we have any sources for this (preferably that are not affiliated with Texas A&M)?  Otherwise, this may need to be merged or it may end up deleted. Karanacs (talk) 21:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: One reference is in the BCS Eagle. Working on more. — BQZip01 — talk 21:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: added one from the local news station too. — BQZip01 — talk 21:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Even with additional non-TAMU sources, is it notable enough for its own article? At this point, I think merging would be appropriate. →Wordbuilder (talk) 21:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree with Wordbuilder...I think we need sources from outside the BCS area to prove that this is actually notable enough for inclusion.  Otherwise, it may need to be merged to Traditions of Texas A&M University or just be given a brief mention in the Aggie Bonfire and Aggie Muster articles. Karanacs (talk) 02:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see either way, but we can also include Benjamin Knox in the mix too. While I realize they are all somewhat Aggie related, they have all chosen to highlight this poem in different ways and are independent entities from the University. I see no problem with merging it and redirecting this page to that section or keeping this as a separate article. I'd like to hear the opinion of the individual who first posted it here. — BQZip01 — talk 03:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved Last Corps trip talk page
Talk:Daniel Wildenstein

message: If a lawsuit or trial involving the subject of an article is worth mentioning in the text, then so is the outcome of the case. 23.242.135.196 (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI 
Talk:United States Sixth Fleet

message: The title for section Task Force 64 special operations is inaccurate as it no longer is responsible for special operations. Recommend changing it to reflect the current mission http://www.naveur-navaf.navy.mil/forces-efforts/ctf-64 Shawn-PAO (talk) 07:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend changing CTF 64
Talk:Ghostriding

message: For what it's worth, we had the following conversation on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles.  --Interiot 19:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, I think it's a real term.  It's a neologism in that it's a relatively newly made up term for a new craze...but it wasn't made up by the person who wrote the article.  It passes the 'google test'.  You can find a dozen ghostriding (or ghostridin') references.  Hopefully a few well deserved Darwin awards will fix this.<sigh>. SteveBaker 23:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are the google hits consistent with the definition given in the article?  (or with each other?)  The google hits that I could find seemed to use ghostriding to mean a wide variety of things, often unrelated to the current article.  So I was wondering if someone more hip than I had heard it consistently used in real life or something. --Interiot 23:52, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't this be under movie stunts, the only place I have ever seen a person exit a moving vehicle is in action movies. Otherwise I think that this article which essentially is a defenition of a slang term should be moved to the wikitionary or for that matter deleted. Regards, Signaturebrendel 00:21, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

text:  The Google hits are indeed completely consistent with the article.  There are MANY videos out there of stupid people opening the driver-side door while the car is in motion - stepping out so one foot is on the window-sill of the door - the other is on the driver seat.  More adventurous people then either jump onto the ground and run alongside the car while it's rolling down the street at maybe 5mph - other people climb onto the hood or onto the roof while the car is still moving with nobody behind the wheel.   There are multiple movies of cars slamming into trees and telephone polls...you name it.  These appear to be ordinary people - not stuntmen or actors.  Sadly, this is all too real and the term "Ghostriding" is indeed the most common term for it. Geez...idiots. SteveBaker 04:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this stub should be merged with the Stupidity article. ;-) Signaturebrendel 19:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

message: This needs more of an explanation. Is it the same thing as Ghostriding proper? The article treats it as if it is something else entirely. Here's the Urbandictionary page. --Liface 02:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost riding the whip
Talk:Nicolas Gage, 8th Viscount Gage

message: ok, i have started with a new article, the times article on firle place indicates notability to me. i don't see any discussion about why a redirect is indicated. Accotink2 talk 16:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: restart

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/the_way_we_live/article6953931.ece. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 00:44, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Beekman, New York

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 01:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lovelorn (album)

message: I removed the bit about Lovelorn being a portmanteau word built from love and forlorn.  The OED says its roots are "love + past participle of obsolete lese 'lose'.."  Plus, it's a word in its own right; it wasn't made up for the title of this album, as the article seemed to be suggesting.  Cardinal Wurzel 16:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Jack D. Foner

message: Both "Jack Foner" and "Jack D. Foner" appear to be more commonly used names for the subject. Any reason we shouldn't move it to one of those? -Will Beback 19:41, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Jack D." seems the most popular. Cheers, -Will Beback 21:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Nuno sa punso

message: This article needs futher cleaning up, a better style, better Englisn, more sources (there aren't any!), etc.--Francisco Valverde 19:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs futher cleaning up, etc. 

message: I don't think this tag is necessary, as the article explains at the beginning that is is a Philippine myth. What do others think? Misspenny 21:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged as not representing worldwide view

message: This has become a fairly common name in Portugal? Nortaak 22:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Has anyone ever met someone with Nuno as a first name?

message: This seriously needs to be sourced and referenced. Deizio talk 02:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources??? 

message: We should know if there are any sightings, if so, add theam to the article.--Sonicobbsessed (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sightings 

message: The article presumes that nunos are real. Which, they are not! "Treat them with respect." What's with that? They don't exist. It's like presuming that the Olympian Gods are real too. Is there any tag for that? -- Felipe Aira 12:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You might consider editing it so it will be less "in-universe"--Lenticel (talk) 04:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's whacked 

message: Nuno and Nuno sa Punso are duplicates. Pfhreak (talk) 17:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Though there's some interesting and possibly valid information here, it's not cited, and seems to be written as though the subject is a scientifically-documented phenomena rather then a cultural/spiritual belief.--Xiaphias (talk) 22:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Multiple Issues" tagged
Talk:Typhoon (disambiguation)

message: Film versions were also made in 1940, 1985, and 2003, but I'm not sure how to cite these. - IstvanWolf 20:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it has an article, sure. If not, no. --Golbez (talk) 15:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Jean-Adam Guilain

message: It said "six" in the original article, but every source elsewhere in the Internet says seven, check  for instance. So I've changed it to "seven". I also changed the wording slightly in that sentence, I take it that the organ pieces were to be played during the liturgy - the previous version kind of seemed to hint that vocal music was included in the collection, which is not true. Jashiin 20:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, each of these suites contain 7 pieces. Concerning your second remark, those pieces were intended to be alterned with vocal parts, but those one are not included in the collection. Gérard 21:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of suites
Talk:Chosen Lords

message: Could a better photo be used in the article? It is blankly obvious that the table can be seen on which the photo has been taken, I suggest that a scanned image of the album cover could be used? --Lachlan Willis 09:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I thought the same when I saw the image but then completely forgot about it for ages. I've changed it now. --CapitalLetterBeginning 10:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

text: on the back of the cd it lists artist names for each track, aphex twin's name appears to the left of the first and last track. afx appears to the left of all other tracks.
It says it's vinyl only, but I believe they were released on picture-disks as well?
They're one and the same, good sir; vinyl picture disks. Dragosian (talk) 01:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Harold's Chicken Shack

message: E.g., in Daytona Beach, Florida, 1943: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/fsa.8d25434/?co=fsa mjk (talk) 15:34, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Harold's Chicken Shacks 

message: This page has been selected by one of my students as a class project. Please be polite and constructive when editing or giving advice and be aware that the students involved in this project are learning Wikipedia along with learning research and writing skills. please assume good faith to their contributions before making changes. If you have any questions, please contact me. --MrSilva (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Class Project Page
Talk:Axiom of union

message: I added a brief note about the reason that the "intersection of the empty set" makes no sense in ZF; but I'm no set theorist, so please feel free to revert if I'm talking crap. Dmharvey 20:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your statement seems correct, assuming an axiom of intersection which goes like: the intersection of a set is the set consisting of all sets which are contained in members of A, or \forall A, \exist B, \forall C: C \in B \iff (\forall D: (C \in D \land D \in A) \lor D \notin A). But you could patch up the axiom to exclude the empty set: \forall A, \exist B, \forall C: C \in B \iff (\forall D: (C \in D \land D \in A) \lor D \notin A) \land \exist E: C \in E \land E \in A or equivalently \forall A, \exist B, \forall C: C \in B \iff (\forall D: (C \in D \land D \in A) \lor D \notin A) \land \exist E: E \in A which makes the intersectionof the empty set the empty set. Of course this should probably be interpreted as that there is no "intersection of the empty set", but the article now reads as if that is the reason that there cannot be an axiom of intersection, which I think is not right. --MarSch 09:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've made a few changes to address your concerns... is that an improvement? I think it's an important point to mention, because anyone with any familiarity with "naive set theory" who is reading about ZF for the first time will see the axiom of union and wonder "why isn't there an axiom of intersection", and pretty much the reasons are: (1) ZF is designed so you don't need it, and (2) if you have an unrestricted axiom of intersection, you run into all the sort of "universe" problems that ZF is specifically trying to avoid. Dmharvey 11:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

text: To 78.8.74.38: No. You should not just make arbitrary definitions. Your "definition" of intersection is not what is meant by that term. So I reverted you. JRSpriggs (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intersection of the empty set 

message: An intersection axiom can be made even
more redundant if we set E = union X, we then
have for the infinite intersection:
: inter X = { y in union X | forall x (x in X -> y in x) }
Jan Burse (talk) 20:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinite Intersection
Talk:Hayley Mills

message: Should Hayley Mills' home address be listed on the info box ? Jamie Stuart (talk) 22:34, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No. See WP:BLPPRIVACY for details. Specifically,  Schazjmd (talk) 00:28, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you !  Jamie Stuart (talk) 05:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home address 

message: Wasn't Hayley Mills interviewed at least twice for Vegetarian Times and featured on the cover at least once (Vegetarian Times - November 1985), and on the cover of The Vegetarian (England, 1980), Peta's Animal Times (January/February 1995), and Viva Life (a Magazine for U.K.and U.S. vegetarians and vegans, Autumn/Winter 2000]??Scott, C. (30 May 2004). "Best of Times, Worst of Times: Hayley Mills". The Times. London. Retrieved 7 April 2009. MaynardClark (talk) 16:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegetarian Times 

message: This well-researched and cited fansite  has good and detailed information and citations that can be mined, for anyone with a mind to do so. Softlavender (talk) 08:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Hayley Mills’ death date is missing. 97.95.244.233 (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: She isn't dead. Schazjmd (talk) 21:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death.
Talk:Superhost

message: Marty:
This is a long shot, but if you're around, I would love some help. I'm trying to remember the real name of a movie I saw on your show one Saturday. In the 70s. I think it was called "The Naked Dane" or "The Naked Dame." I've tried to Google it but can't find anything. It was black & white and basically the scary element of the movie was this glowing woman that would appear and scare people. I would guess that it was from the 1940s or earlier. But not sure. Please post if you have an idea about what I'm talking about.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.223.18.102 (talk) 21:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To update some of the information in some of the linked articles;  I'm now (2006) 74 years old, in reasonable health but my sister passed away in 1997 of lung cancer.  Yes, she smoked, but many in her age group did.  I shall monitor this site occasionally so if you have any questions.....?
Marty Sullivan AKA Superhost or Super Host!
Gimme that shoe!!! Thanks for the memories.
Super Host! I once saw a poster of you (the picture you have on your wikipedia) I was wondering where I can find one.  I doubt they are still available but I do want to purchase one. Any ideas??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.64.151 (talk) 02:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment from Marty (?)  moved from article page. 

message: Oh Wow!  Now that explains everything! ;-)
And no photo of Superhost?  --roger (talk) 00:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Navy Veteran 
Talk:Blood Wake

message: A simple thing for a good writer to add would be a listing of boats and weapon types plus a synopis of the story.--Xiahou 01:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  boats and weapons 

message: JimmyBlackwing, not sure if this one has anything legit, or if it's just more OR. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 03:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced reception 

message: This is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.
Category                	Flag	Comments
Overall                 	    	The article generally meets the form of the manual of style but has minor issues, such as gaps in its content or missing elements, or requires greater editing to assist in clarity, balance and flow.
Layout                  	    	The article has a layout with sections that conforms to all the foundational sections of the manual of style.
Lead section            	    	The lead section mostly conforms with the manual of style, but the opening sentence misses key details and/or the paragraph does not summarize the content of the article.
Infobox                 	    	The article contains an appropriate infobox.
Gameplay                	    	The article contains a description of gameplay, but is either insufficient to cover a clear description of the game or has excessive or trivial details.
Screenshot and cover art	    	The article contains a screenshot and cover art for the game.
Plot                    	    	The article contains a plot section of appropriate length, from an external perspective, focused on describing the key events in a playthrough of the game.
Development             	    	The article contains a development section that is focused on the design and release of the game.
Reception               	    	The article's reception section has issues, such as insufficient content, clutter in the section, overuse of direct quotations, undue weight or trivia. The article may also benefit from a review aggregator score and ratings template if appropriate.
Sources                 	    	The article contains reliable sources, but the article's content is not well cited, is heavy on primary sources, or the sources are inconsistently or incorrectly cited.
 ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  VP:VG article reassessment (20 September 2023)
Talk:List of fraternities and sororities in the Philippines

message: The following have been removed because they lack a Wikipedia article, website, or other reliable source. They might have social media, but that is not usable for a Wikipedia reference. They can be restored to the article once a source is found or an article exists.
*Alpha Eagle, January 3, 1991, Iligan City, Service fraternity and sorority, National, SEC, Active
*Delta Gamma Beta, University of Cebu, Service fraternity and sorority, Internationa, SEC, Active
*Delta Fraternity and Sorority International, October 24, 1961, University of Santo Tomas	Social, fraternity and sorority, Active, National, 50+, SEC, Active	
*Delta Sphinx Family, October 2, 1978, Ateneo de Zamboanga University, Social and service fraternity and sorority, National, 10, SEC, Active	
*Gamma Omicron Delta Sigma, July 7, 1990, Mabolo, Cebu City, Philippines, Collegiate and community-based service fraternity, National, 11, Active	
*Phi Beta Rho, June 24, 1962, Central Luzon State University, Coed confraternity, International, SEC, Active
*Lex Cervus Fraternitas, January 17, 1977, San Sebastian College – Recoletos, Law Professional fraternity, National, 3, SEC, Active		
Rublamb (talk) 16:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed for notability