Talk:Kurram District

message: I propose to add the information from the article on the Kurram River to this one as they cover much of the same information. I also propose to keep it all under the heading of the Kurram Valley - as that covers more territory - not just the river, and I have more information on recent archaeological finds in the region and more references which I intend to add when I can spare the time. If anyone has any comments on this proposed move I would appreciate them. John Hill (talk) 02:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Combine with Kurram River?

message: Kurram valley is completely in Pakistan and only shares border with Afghanistan. Why this is included in Project Afghanistan??
Anyone can answer please??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.27.192.9 (talk) 06:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why it is part of project Afghanistan???

message: Yes, I think you are right that it should be merged with Kurram river page. In the same light this page should be merged with Kurram Agency page. The scope of the two articles being the same.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waleedmansoor (talk • contribs) 07:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge it with Kurram Agency 

message: The flora and fauna section removed on Feb. 5 2010 for the reason that it "said nothing" needs to be restarted.
The section needed expansion and is important because it was the only valley in the northwest British India for which flora had been scientifically described as early as 1879 (before annexation, when it was a part of Afghanistan). Citations are available in The Imperial Indian Gazette and many scientific journals indexed.
Of particular importance is the Artimesia spp. peculiar to the valley and therefore scientifically named after the Valley "Artemisia Kurramensis" in 1951.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irshijee (talk • contribs) 21:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restart Flora and Fauna section. 

message: I really think that Kurram River should be separated from this article again.  It covers  a much longer area than the valley - it is an Afghan river as well as a Pakistani river.  A section on an Afghan river does not sit well in an article about a Pakistani valley.
On the other hand, there is a lot of overlap with Kurram Agency, and this article would be better merged with that article, --Mhockey (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger and split 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.kurram.net.tc
*:Triggered by \bnet\.tc\b on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: your recent moves of Pakistani agency articles, such as this one, was contested at WP:RMTR by . I have therefore restored them to their previous long-term titles, "Kurram Agency" etc. I suggest that if you wish them to be moved, you should start a move request at WP:RM. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 21:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please check this and let me know what is your objection on these moves? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 03:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  President of Pakistan signed the amendment on 31 May, that is probably why you wouldn't find anything as of late May, see below move discussion, I have added many sources there supporting the moves. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed moves