lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roland Nilsson

message: Roland Nilsson didnt play the third place-playoff during EURO'92, however, there was no third place play-off in the 1992 European championship, so no-one else did either :)
217.10.108.177 20:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euro 92 third-place playoff 

message: I am aware that Tomas Brolin has claimed one of Nilsson's international goals , but I do not think it appropriate to change the article until there is some sort of official announcement on the matter. The statistics of 116 games and 2 goals are widely reported and accepted, the goal itself has been reported as Nilsson's for 20 years. I am not too fussed who the goal is awarded to, but for the sake of veracity I think that we should wait until someone such as FIFA, UEFA or the SvFF make a statement - I do not think that Wikipedia should unilaterally alter accepted statistics. Rje (talk) 19:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  International goals 

message: How much do you think Roland appreciates that we still sing his name 30 years later 2A02:C7E:1EBE:2D00:9022:8F13:AE61:6CE7 (talk) 22:19, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheffield Wednesday
Talk:Louise Beavers

message: An item in the "Filmography" section:   @#!*% 's Highway (1932)
How can this be a real entry? Thanks, Wordreader (talk) 07:22, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this on the level? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Garrewl0 (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Academic Research and Critical Thinking
Talk:Ian Duncan (rally driver)

message: I'm going to "appropriate" this redirect, partly to fix the wikilinks from the World Rally Championship results pages, and partly because I've never heard of Iain Duncan Smith being referred to as "Ian Duncan" (especially with the mis-spelled first name). I therefore don't think a disambiguation page is necessary. Regards, -- DeLarge 18:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Imre Varadi

message: "Journeyman" seems a bit harsh, he scored over 100 goals in the top flight. Note that journeyman doesn't mean well-travelled, it means lacking expertise, ordinary, mediocre.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7E:2C7:4300:2939:37E9:EC9C:B06C (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Youth Without Youth (film)

message: *Youth Without Youth: A Pinnacle for UPP Prague —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual effects 
Talk:Belfast suburban rail

message: A map of the rail routes would improve the article. Jvlm.123 18:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cork Suburban Rail

message: A route map would improve the quality of the article. Jvlm.123 18:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Could someone please update the route map as the Cork to Midelton service has been started from today onword. All stations along the route are also open.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordan353 (talk • contribs) 09:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route Map 
Talk:2005 Brazilian football match-fixing scandal

message: Seems strange. --Awiseman 18:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not strange. The clubs did not participated of the match-fixing. Only the referees mentioned in the article and some betting websites did. Carioca 18:56, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It says they were paid by investors, I assumed they were investors of the clubs involved? If not, that should be clarified. --Awiseman 18:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they were not club investors. I clarified this in the article. Carioca 19:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, but what did they invest in? The betting websites? What was in it for them?--Awiseman 01:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why were no teams punished?
Talk:Applegate Trail

message: Article seem to be copyvio, cut-and-paste, from this source: Applegate Trail. Needs paraphrasing. Katr67 18:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just stubbified this because of the copyvio. Katr67 (talk) 17:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio

message: What is the correct use of bolding? In this article, names of other trails are bolded. Does that conform to WP's norms? Posted this out of curiosity and for my own learning. --Kotlerthebaker (talk) 07:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It should mean that those are redirects linked to this article.  See MOS:BOLD.  —EncMstr (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  bolding question 

message: I was a bit confused by the map on this article when I read it. I did some digging and saw an edit in 2019 that replaced the older map with the current map, which might be a nicer looking map but also doesn't illustrate the Applegate Trail actually going into Oregon.
I see there's been past discussion about the map used in this article, but the new map doesn't fix any of the concerns and actually makes some of them worse. ("The picture should probably be changed. From just looking at that, one would think that it ends in southern Oregon rather than going up to the Willamete Valley", eh?) The older map wasn't fantastic, but I think it may have been a slightly better choice for the article. Ideally it'd be a map that actually shows the full length of the Applegate Trail, but I'm not sure where to find one.
12.6.30.26 (talk) 04:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better map wanted
Talk:Ferdinand Cheval

message: Surely it would be helpfull if the article said where in france the palais was somewhere in the text? Abigsmurf 13:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  location? 

message: palace would be the more obvious translation for palais; a castle implies fortification.  —Tamfang 18:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are right and changed the translation accordingly. Gestumblindi 00:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castle or Palace? 

message: Almost all or all the external links are dead. Here's a possible replacement for anyone to add who has mastered the new system for adding links:
http://www.facteurcheval.com/histoire/palais-ideal-facteur-cheval.html
Awien (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: Robert Hughes in his book The Shock of the New (1980), discusses Cheval at length under the heading Surrealism; but throughout identifies Cheval in English as le facteur Cheval, much as the painter Rousseau is identified as le douanier. Nuttyskin (talk) 01:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Hughes 
Talk:HMS Ocean (R68)

message: I've added some brief info on the planned Australian acquision of this carrier during Word War II. This has nothing to do with the eventual acquisition of HMA Ships Melbourne and Sydney. If anyone's interested I'll expand it a bit more after my holiday. -- saberwyn 23:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned Australian acquisition 
Talk:HMS Triumph (R16)

message: The text says that No. 827 Squadron flew "vintage Seafires" early in the Korean War, seeming to imply that the squadron also flew some Fairey Fireflies.  I don't have my references at hand but I believe that's erroneous.  The Seafire unit probably was No. 800 while 827 flew Fireflies. Seafires flew in the Fleet Air Arm from 1942 onward, but in 1950 the embarked models were Mk 47s, which had entered service only about two years before.  
68.2.63.115 (talk) 00:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean War squadrons 

message: Added by  in this edit, moving here in case it is of interest and help in expanding the article. Benea (talk) 06:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal account 
Talk:HMS Venerable (R63)

message: I've added an infobox to this article with the full career history with all 3 navies included, I've copied this career history into the other 2 articles with the name of the ship wikilinked to the other two articles. Therefore all 3 articles are cross referenced. JonEastham (talk) 10:40, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:HMS Warrior (R31)

message: A nice start, with lots of pretty infoboxes and all that. Still, pretty short overall. Is it possible to find a picture? LordAmeth 16:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: please could someone update this and to check the info is up to date and is still corect 195.213.95.14 (talk) 20:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  wiki page
Talk:HMS Albion (R07)

message: I seved with 45 cdo and we did Cyprus on excerise and were told " no duff ". we headed for Gibralter as the Russians had tried to take over at Gib as there was due a take over to hand back Gib to Spian. I remember our skipper had warned we would ram 2 Russian frigates blocking Gib and we might have to retake the rock. It never came to that as the russians left smartish. Has anyone any memories. Please e-mail me at kevin.sibley@ntlworld.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.66.135 (talk) 21:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  H.M.S Albion. 1970-71
Talk:Fearless-class landing platform dock

message: I have uploaded a picture, but it's rather spoiled by a pole! However it,s better than none at all, and it's public domain... Is it ethical to electronically remove the pole? Davidelit (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I made a minor edit.  The existing text said that nuclear submarines have steam turbine-electric drive.  While there are a few nuclear submarines (e.g. French boats) with turboelectric drive, most nuclear submarines use geared turbines.  Keacla1 (talk) 10:12, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam Turbine Drive
Talk:HMS Boxer (F121)

message: Why is this group of three termed (by Wikimedia Commons, at least) as the "Boxer class", when  was the first to be launched (by a couple of months). Is there any sourcing for that?  Why does most discussion always seem to focus on Boxer? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boxer class?
Talk:Invincible-class battlecruiser

message: This one:
They were least successful when standing in the main line of battle where they faced enemy battleships although the loss of Invincible to a magazine explosion during the Battle of Jutland, although this explosion owed more to flaws in British ammunition handling...
Seemed a strange structure, with two uses of although. Changed it to "...battleships. An example of this is the loss..." JJJJS (talk) 17:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote line in introduction
Talk:HMS Invincible (1907)

message: There's a remarkable note on twitter here about a letter sent by Hood's widow to the wives of all the crew, giving a summary of the battle as told to her by Dannreuther. Twitter is not our best source, of course, but if this turns up in any usable sources (perhaps a biography of Hood?) it looks like it would be a good detail to include. Andrew Gray (talk) 22:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Letter from Lady Hood
Talk:Indefatigable-class battlecruiser

message: Which is a hyphen used in the lead, but not in the article's title? —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, one was the noun form, which doesn't need a hyphen, but the other was the adjectival form which did. But I've rewritten the lead to standardize things. Good catch.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphen
Talk:Paul Warhurst

message: is not the father of Paul Warhurst (although it's a popular belief). If you go to Paul Warhurst's website, at icons.com, registration probably required, and click on Milestones, and then on 07: My biggest influence, he cites his biggest influence as "my dad Peter who has helped me brilliantly throughout my life and career". Struway2 | Talk 07:49, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roy Warhurst
Talk:Chris Woods

message: Whadda you do when there's two (or more) people of the same name, and only one of them comes up under a search?  I'm looking for the artist Chris Woods, and I'm getting a football player.  Shouldn't a list of them come up, to choose from?  Or has simply nobody started an article on my guy yet?
58.106.139.221 05:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Chris Woods. 

message: I have re-rated this article as start-class only. It needs a vast amount of work before it can reach "B"-class - some references would do for a start.    --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification
Talk:HMS Princess Royal (1911)

message: Just to note, the first German battlecruiser was , not the s. Parsecboy (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Laid down March 1908, launched March 1909, whereas the Moltkes were built 1909–1911. - Dank (push to talk) 02:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if one ship isn't considered to constitute a class, I still think it's likely that someone reading quickly would be left with the impression that the Moltkes were the first battlecruisers, so I made the change. - Dank (push to talk) 02:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

text: One in the lead and once in the main body. Is that a problem?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Linking it twice isn't a problem for me and it's unlikely to be a problem for any reviewer (but no guaranties).  But we don't usually do initialisms or acronyms twice.  It would probably be better to lose the one in the lead. - Dank (push to talk) 00:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okey-dokey!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick comment 

message: Just an observation  that the article quotes ships range at a speed of 10 knots. obviously we are limited by what information is available, but this is an unrealistically slow speed for operational conditions. Rnage would be significantly less at higher speeds. Sandpiper (talk) 22:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  range 

message: "The starboard after 4-inch (102 mm) gun was removed in early 1917,[13] fitted to a high-angle mount capable of 60° of elevation, and returned in April along with a second, similarly modified gun from Princess Royal's sister ship HMS Lion.[12]"
Note 13 is to pg161 of Burt. That is correct as far as it goes.
Note 12 is creditted to pg83 of Roberts.
Neither author says the 4in gun removed from Lion was put in a High-Angle mount and installed on Princess Royal.
Where did that eminate?
Thru-a-hoop (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 4in secondary gun that was converted to High-Angle from Lion
Talk:Admiral-class battlecruiser

message: Inasmuch as there was only one ship built in this class, it's not surprising that most of the information in this article seems to duplicate information in the article about HMS Hood.  Should the two be combined?
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 11:06, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I'll be stripping out most of the design and construction stuff from the Hood article shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Other way round surely? There were plans to build 4 ships, but only one got built. Hood diverted in design and building from the other three so she is unique ajnd should be treated as such. GraemeLeggett (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the Hood article will focus on the differences between her and the rest of the Admirals, but there's no need to duplicate the basics that she shares with her unbuilt sisters. I expect that the construction section will get quite large with all the changes made then. Oh, and thanks for the catch on the torpedo size in the infobox.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication?
Talk:G3 battlecruiser

message: Use of the qualifier 'British' when talking of the Royal Navy is superfluous. The phrase 'Royal Navy' always refers to the British RN, whereas any other nation [sweden, the netherlands etc] use their country name in the title. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Psidogretro (talk • contribs) 16:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Royal Navy 

message: Just to give notice, I'm going to radically overhaul this page.  Breyer was working on incorrect information when he described this class in his book, and I'm assuming I'm the only one here with Campbell's excellent set of 4 WARSHIP articles on the class.
And really, where did this G3 idea come from??  Never seen that before, ever.  --Harlsbottom (talk) 15:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice 

message: There seems to be some confusion about boilers. 
It was quite normal practice to have auxiliary boilers which were normally used for heating and electrical power etc when the ship was in dock or harbour and the main boilers and engines were shut down. Auxiliary boilers could be fitted in either a main boiler room or in a seperate compartment.AT Kunene (talk) 15:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you referring to?. There's no discussion of auxiliary boilers in the article whatsoever.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boilers 

message: I'll probably mess this up entirely as I'm totally new to editing -  but, if this isn't a photograph of a G3 then what is it?
https://i.imgur.com/tHU00ZF.jpg
Source info:  http://archive.is/LCAEg#selection-639.33-639.658  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.16.103 (talk) 11:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a hoax, read down to the comments.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

text: The article specifically states that none were laid down before they were suspended and then cancelled. I'll have to look up what yards they were assigned to.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Only one source (Campbell) claims that the vessels were not laid down, whereas three others note documentation found at John Brown which shows that, at least three weeks prior to cancellation, sufficient material had been ordered for construction to begin. Unfortunately, unless photographic evidence comes to light, this matter will remain open to speculation. Astronomy Explained (talk) 01:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battleship G3
Talk:Henry Grace à Dieu

message: Is there a source for calling it "largest and most powerful warship in Europe."? Because the Michael, which she was apparently built in response to, was 75 feet longer and apparently could mount the largest naval gun in history, the Mons Meg.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.155.35 (talk) 03:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:HMS Defence (1763)

message: Text and references copied from David Atkins (Royal Navy officer) to HMS Defense (1763),  See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Article on David Atkins (Royal Navy officer) was redirected to this page per this discussion.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Talk:HMS Ajax

message: The article says "Eight ships of the Royal Navy have been named HMS Ajax after the Greek hero Ajax".
Then 10 vessels by that name are listed.  The 9th is a barge, the 10 a possible name of a submarine.  Are these not being counted in the 8?
Thanks, CBHA (talk) 20:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counting ships
Talk:The Bay Boy

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:HMS Minden (1810)

message: Removed from the article:
:If the story that has for so long been told regarding the Minden and Scott Key is wrong then reference should be made to two letters from Keys daughter Elizabeth that state the opposite. The letters were written after Keys death and specifically mention the Minden as the ship her father was on. Key was with her until he died and staying at her home. There is much speculation and a lot of research that is current and shows otherwise. I ask you then why would Elizabeth mention the Minden? I suggest that despite what has been discovered that her statements in these letters is oral history and compelling evidence. One would think that the daughter of a then already famous man would have been told in detail the events of those days when the anthem was written. She states "the Minden was the ship my father was on". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthead (talk • contribs) 18:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Type "Noyes Lincoln 1863" in the Search box of The Library of Congress America Memory images at this address http://memory.loc.gov/ . The letter to Abraham Lincoln talking about the Minden being a "flag of truce" is the very first one. Click on Transcription for the text of the letter.--Doug Coldwell talk 23:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aboard or not?
Talk:Shtick

message: Pity the content of this article is so North American. Shtick is surely a feature of many (all?) settings, languages and cultures.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wordsmith2015 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

message: Interesting! But did you know that most Yiddish words are derived from German?
The word "Schtick" is the German word "Stück", spoken the same way and meaning exactly the same.
_---THIS IS NOT TRUE---Most Yiddish words are not from German
I don't understand the part about jerry lewis, is it supposed to be humour ?
Links should be fixed so that the possessive apostrophe is linked. I assume it was sheer laziness on the part of the original author, so that they didn't have to do something of the form  link text .
--Nightcrawler1089 05:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial post

message: Where I come from, We use schtick also to express randomness in a conversation.
Like for example, "How was your job interview?"
Then the reply would be "Good schtick!"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lothlit (talk • contribs) 13:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In my house 

message: The usage and primary topic of  is under discussion, see talk:Schtick (disc game) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:24, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Schtick"
Talk:Lacey Turner

message: A cite is needed for younger sisters names and ages. MrSecret 21:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would it be ok for me to make a List of awards and nominations for Lacey Turner article, so we could put this rather massive table in there and just list the ones she's won here? Gungadin 18:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's necessary just now. But for anyone trying to source the table, try checking List of awards and nominations received by EastEnders. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  an awards article 

message: No mention of that scandal?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.63.129 (talk) 18:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a scandal, it's not notable, it has nothing to do with her career as an actress and I can't even find a reliable source for it. Per WP:BLP and WP:GOSSIP, I would steer very clear of any mention of it in this article. ~~ Peteb16 (talk) 09:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCTV Video 
Talk:Defence-class ironclad

message: I'm puzzled why Westwood, Baillie has been altered from Cubitt Town to the less specific Poplar. The company was based at London Yard, which is definitely in Cubitt Town. Pterre (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Ballard says Poplar. I wonder if this is a case where the corporate HQ is in one neighborhood and the actual yard is in another.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, to the best of my knowledge (see for example here) London Yard was the HQ and the yard - this was not a huge multi-site company. Cubitt Town was then in the Metropolitan Borough of Poplar (now part of Tower Hamlets), but Cubitt Town is a more precise location. Pterre (talk) 17:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but is London Yard preferable to both? That is the actual site where the ship was built and the company HQ'd. Or do you think that is too specific?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I prefer Cubitt Town, but either this or London yard would be fine. Pterre (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poplar