Talk:Wild Oats Markets

message: :Image:WildOats Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WildOats Logo.gif

message: :Image:WildOats Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WildOats Logo.gif

message: Can someone clarify what happened to the $565MM?  Whole  Foods bought out Wild Oats,  then had to let it go?  Sounds like they got shnarfted by the court.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace Rutherfords (talk • contribs) 19:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Buyout then resell?

message: This article really needs to be updated so as to inform the reader as to what has happened with the chain since Whole Foods agreed to sell the intellectual property of Wild Oats Markets to Luberski Inc. in 2010. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but it seems that before Whole Foods lost in the appeals court, it had already either re-branded or shut down all the Wild Oats Market stores. But what does the sale of the intellectual property to Luberski Inc. at mean? Does that mean Luberski Inc. will be recreating the Wild Oats chain? Are all former Wild Oats Market stores that where not simply closed down not sold back to Luberski Inc and are now simply Whole Foods stores? How was Whole Foods able subsume Wild Oats Market when the governments appeals had not run out? I would have thought the court would have granted a stay of the merger while the government appealed. --Notcharliechaplin (talk) 11:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: if i missed anything, feel free to add. FriarTuck1981 (talk) 05:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status of Wild Oats Market chain 

message: It does not appear Wild Oats is still listed on the NASDAQ.  New information can be found in this article dated April 9, 2014: http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-rt-us-walmart-wildoats-20140409,0,5391307.story  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.35.177 (talk) 09:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status of Wild Oats Market chain 

message: Some info that should be in the body of the article:
* The number of stores with the Wild Oats Market brand name that are currently (as of June, 2018) operating.
* The number of Wild Oats Markets operating in 2007 when Whole Foods attempted to merge with them and how that number differs today (I assume the number is much less).
* I believe a number of Wild Oats Markets where closed down, property sold off so we should include at least some mention of that. We don't need to list every closed Wild Oats Markets during the attempted merger but at least mention that this was the fate x number of stores and maybe sone other related details such if they mostly took place in areas already having a Whole Foods.
* If some Wild Oats Markets stores where converted to Whole Foods Stores but later sold off as part of the forced sale of Wild Oats Markets, after the merger approval was overturned by the appeals court, then this should be included in the article. 
* The history section stops in 2001. We should include the above suggested info in paragraph or two about what happened to Wild Oats Market after the merger deal was overturned by the appeals court. 
* The article mentions in the intro that Luberski Inc. (d.b.a. as Hidden Villa Ranch),bought it from whole foods then, later sold it in 2012 The Yucaipa Companies, but nowhere in the article does it mention that. The content in the intro/lead is supposed to summarize the article itself, unless the article is currently just a stub, which this one is not. Thus, we need to mention this info in the history section as I already suggested, and go into greater detail where possible.
--Notcharliechaplin (talk) 22:13, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things missing from the article or needing more detail 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed