Talk:Punisher/Archive 4

message: In the May 2007 issue of Wizard magazine, Frank Castle the Punisher is described as "the breakout character from the Civil War." The rise of Frank is one of the most important things  to come of the Civil War, and the Civil War is the most important thing to happen in Castle's life so far.Erudil 17:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Breakout Character of the Civil War

message: There's been this mention of THQ and Marvel stating there will be a sequel to 2005's Punisher game. I am fairly sure that main info came from a Marvel quarterly report that said a Punisher sequel was on the production slate, but haven't been able to locate it. I took out the mention entirely since there's no reference right now, and the year was simply updated from 2006 to 2007 without solid information. Definitely something that should be re-added once we find more information.
Neo aa 16:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Game Sequel

message: Don't you think that something about ones who aided him could be added? I know that for most Punisher fans Garth Ennis' version is mega cool and Frank hasn't had any true helper since Soap joined gay porn industry, but during previous volumes he had quite a lot of allies. I mean Micro, Mickey something - the would-be wiseguy, whom he spared and used as a informer, the policewoman he met in a park, Outlawand some other guys. He also had rather good relationshp with for example Moon Knight.
80.55.115.210 18:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Microchip has his own page already. And it's Mickey Fondozzi. Lots42 10:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sidekicks and allies 

message: I think that someone with a better english than mine should add a small section about this story. --62.11.89.240 18:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punisher: The End 

message: I removed a citation needed under his cameo in the X-Men Animated Series episode, Mojovision.  The reason I removed it is because the source is stated in that sentence.  The source is the television episode itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.156.89.159 (talk • contribs) 
:and the reason i placed the citation is because its not mentioned in the episode summary here in wikipedia †Bloodpack† 18:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: seems like the entry violates WP:NOR †Bloodpack† 18:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Sup, are you the one who PMed me? Sorry, but ill need to check the image later. The PC internet im using is limited/blocked to images. And we cant afford any assumptions that the character on that jpeg is the punisher. Laterz... †Bloodpack† 21:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed a "citation needed 

message: :Image:Punisher dvd 2004.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Punisher dvd 2004.jpg

message: I noticed that every small detail as to the development of a The Punisher 2 film keeps getting added here. Please bear in mind that a main article already exists. What were having here is just a concise/brief info about the "finished" 2004 film. If you have anything to add as to the film's development/progression including who's gonna write, direct, produce, artists, etc. please refer directly to the The Punisher 2 article. Thank you †Bloodpack† 15:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  punisher 2 sequel additions 

message: Is this picture really representative of the punisher? It seems amateur at best. It should be replaced by a truer picture of him. Andraxx 22:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While personally I agree with you, the artist, Tim Bradstreet, is a veeeery popular Punisher artist. He has done loads of Punisher covers.Lots42 11:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, did anyone notice that, since his revampment, the Punisher looks an awful lot like Nicolas Cage? 201.9.129.250 14:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  new picture 

message: Not many people know or comprehend 'Earth Whatever Number'. I'd change them to more well known titles, like 2099 and Marvel Zombies (and of course alphabetize them) but I'm afraid of messsing up the references. Lots42 03:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand, but it's the "alternate versions" we're talking about so it's more appropriate to use the "numbered designations" in the Marvel Multiverse for the Punisher. We're not talking comicbook titles which they're well known from. Besides, these "well known" titles are also mentioned under the article description. Readers might not know these "Earth Whatever Number" that's why we're making them know it =] †Bloodpack† 03:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Bloodpack, all though I do not agree on taking off Earth-717, but that topic is for debate in the future. Legobrickmaster 18:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Versions 

message: The page is at Punisher just now. Isn't he officially The Punisher? Has this been discussed before? Chris Cunningham 18:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Punisher" or "The Punisher"? 

message: Does anything notable happen to the Punisher in this issue?  I don't see any reason why the Hulk tie-in deserves any mention at all, much less its own section. --Roger McCoy 06:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War Hulk 

message: In many marvel comics character pages it mentions the main 616 character and then "other versions" one thing that has been missed is that MAX is NOT 616 (Fury being different is proof enough) 
Please separate the sections, IMO (which may not matter) Max shouldn't even get one, other max versions of characters only get one or two lines (see US war machine for example)
All of Punishers series including Marvel Knights and new war journal are 616 but MAX isnt.
You could move max to where 2099 and zombies are maybe link from their to its own page.
Also in this regard in a bit mentioning MAX it refers to the destruction of Grand Nixon Island which occured in Knights.
I think this could all confuse a reader who doesnt know they are different universes.
Lots of raw info but i think the structure needs overhaul in this regard, im not the one to do it being a wiki-newb  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.25.150 (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAX and 616 

message: The article seems to imply that Garthn Ennis ignores Punisher's supernatural background; this is not true. In the relaunch, where Ennis works with the artist Steve Dillon, the Punisher acknowledges the supernatural on at least one occasion. Lots42 (talk) 03:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supernatural 

message: :Image:Amspman129.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Amspman129.jpg