lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:René Clair

message: I'm sure this guy released a book (diary/non-fiction book) about the movies somewhere in the 60s. I dont have access to that book now so i cannot complete information about it. But in my country, it was released as Po namyśle by Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy. If somebody find more info about it, please add it to the article. I think many interesting things about him can be found in that book what would make this article much more accurate. Bartekfm (talk) 23:52, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  DIARY 

message: Hi, Who distributes René Clair movies (with English subs)? Cheers, --Dan Bolser (talk) 22:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distributors? 
Talk:Jean-Pierre Bacri

message: Rumour has it that they are divorced or at least are separated. They has refused to comment on this subject, which has been taken as a confirmation of these speculations in media. Somebody who really knows?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.121.240.4 (talk) 16:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bacri-Jaoui not a couple anymore? 
Talk:Dassault Mirage 5

message: In the Variants section the first model, the Mirage 5, the model that gives its name to the entire article and the whole family of fighters, is listed as "radarless". Yet it doesn't say anything in the article about the radar being removed to create the Mirage 5. It says "avionics were removed to create room for additional fuel tanks" and that it has a longer, more pointed nose cone. That works seem like a pretty major alteration and worth mentioning in the text if it's true. 
If it was just just a few of the minor sub variants that had the radar deleted it would be one thing, but the main character itself is declared a day fighter. And even the Kfir has a ranging radar.  Idumea47b (talk) 17:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a source that directly states that it was the radar that was deleted and not just unspecified avionics. Jackson states that later variants of the Mirage V were built with radar and notes that the 'Mirage V' designation became meaningless. The 'early development' header could be changed to something like 'concept' as my addition could be anachronistic. My understanding is that it was intended to be a cheap, easily maintainable, fair-weather combat aircraft but it became something else later. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 15:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Radarless"
Talk:Bonaventure des Périers

message: This article, until just now, had his birth year as c. 1510, but that and an earlier change to 1501 look like an undetected vandal. Encyclopaedia Britannica (current as well as 1911) has c. 1500. However, Chenevière 1885 mentions a marble plaque that says he was born in 1498, although I haven't read enough to know whether Chenevière goes on to dispute that. I doubt any other more authoritative source could be found. David Brooks (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: However, La Charité's translation of his tales (1972) says the date is "generally agreed" to be 1510-1515. David Brooks (talk) 00:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth?
Talk:Auguste Villiers de l'Isle-Adam

message: I'm wondering about the accuracy of the statement "He coined the term "Android" (Andréide in French) in L'Ève future." ... 
I just found an 1883 US patent for "Androides or Automation Shoe Factory" where the "Androides" are mechanical factory workers with human appearance. This predates Villiers' 1886 novel L'Ève future. See   Cbaer 17:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement in the article sounds bogus, very bogus.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.117.3 (talk) 02:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Android

message: When I first heard about the "most famous line" from his masterpiece Axel, years ago, it wasn't as a verbatim quote but merely paraphrased, so I thought the implication would be that procreating and making love was something "the servants" could be entrusted with. Of course, even if it were just that, it would lead to the rapid extinction of the noble classes that Villiers and his readers identified with. ;>  83.254.154.164 (talk) 03:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: He probably welcomed such extinction because he had contempt and distaste for material life.173.72.115.153 (talk) 21:17, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous quoted line 

message: In the “Life” section, it is stated that he thought of "...reciting his poetry to a paying public in a cage full of tigers, but he executed the idea.” Does this mean that he carried out the idea, in other words, he performed the recitation?173.72.115.153 (talk) 02:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Execution
Talk:Conrad Malte-Brun

message: As far as I can tell, 'Universal Geography, Or, a Description of All the Parts of the World, on a New Plan', volume 1, was first published in English in 1822 by A. Black. See here: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=uEkNAQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=universal+geography+conrad+1822+volume+1&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Ke7lUrDBDYOV7AbWm4Aw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
You have it in the article as being 1827 (A. Findley) in the links directing to different volumes.
1822 is the first edition I can find, in English. Can anyone find an earlier version? Also, when was the first French edition published?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.112.2 (talk) 05:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "opened a hole new research perspective" 2A02:8108:9640:1A68:4DF8:A0AF:4F2D:BE71 (talk) 05:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please control your text!
Talk:List of James Bond novels and short stories

message: We need articles on Horowitz's With a Mind to Kill and Kim Sherwood's new novel, too. 23skidoo (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: With a Mind to Kill/Double or Nothing articles needed

message: Charlie Higson has a new adult Bond book out called "On His Majesty’s Secret Service" Charliepenandink (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New book needs adding 

message: Is there a reason why the Moneypenny Diaries aren't included in the main series? Bond is featured in them and they were fully authorized by IFP. It doesn't make sense not to include them, especially now the Bond-less "Double-o-Nothing" series is being included. 23skidoo (talk) 05:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moneypenny Diaries 

message: Due to the James Bond character going public domain in Canada a few years back there have been several novels and short story collections published. Should these be included? 136.159.160.122 (talk) 21:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian novels and short stories
Talk:Abel Corbin

message: This just clicks-thru to the same page. Valetude (talk) 02:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virginia Grant hyperlink 
Talk:René Rapin

message: This work was published in English, trans. Thomas Rymer, in 1674, so it couldn't possibly be from 1676 as the Catholic Encyclopedia claims.  See the entry in Google Books.  I believe it was published in French and English in the same year, '74, and I've changed it in the article accordingly. 140.247.237.86 (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of the work on Aristotle's Poetics
Talk:Louis-Alexandre de Launay, comte d'Antraigues

message: The 1911 Encyclopedia citations list a work by Édouard de Goncourt. But I feel confident in identifying Edmond de Goncourt as author; there is another book by him on Mme Saint-Huberty, and I can find no reference to "Édouard". David Brooks (talk) 00:02, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goncourt citation
Talk:Nanny 911

message: Anybody notice how Nanny Yvonne hardly EVER gets chosen?  What is her specialty, her expertise?  Every episode I watch, Head Nanny Lillian chooses one of the other two.  I think that could be an interesting portion of this entry.--Jaylectricity 01:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To be fair, Deb and Stella have a little more experience under the belts in comparison to Yvonne.--Conquistador2k6 22:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: And of course one week after I wrote that message about Yvonne she gets picked for that week's show.--Jaylectricity 22:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nanny Yvonne

message: I think someone should make a table for the list of episodes.--72.208.195.165 00:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I started the table but I don't want to work on it anymore. Can somebody finish it?--72.208.195.191 16:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes

message: I think the episode list should be seperated into its own article as it seems big enough for its own article. Do you think this would work?. Mythdon (talk) 06:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperation

message: What about the recently released game? http://www.bigfishgames.com/download-games/6239/nanny-911/index.html 
should it be added to this page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.82.51.102 (talk) 02:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nanny 911 the game

message: it had 3 nannies and in each episode one of them visited a family. then there was a norwegian version of that concept that aired on the same channel but norwegian authorities banned the production of further episodes.(extreme but true.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.59.120 (talk) 23:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  i saw a swedish concept that looked rather similar 

message: This article seems to have suffered multiple vandalism since its creation. Going through the history it's very difficult to determine which edits are accurate and which are not. The majority of edits have been done by IP editors who have neither left edit summaries to clarify why certain edits were made nor properly sourced their edits. I've never watch the series myself and I'm therefore unable to determine the factual accuracy of those edits. Expert help needed.EagerToddler39 (talk) 14:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert editing required

message: FYI I've been looking at edits made by the IP address 70.44.149.2 and so far every one I looked at has needed to be reverted I see that IP edited this article and my first impression is the edits are introducing incorrect information but I'd like someone with more familiarity with the subject to confirm.--S Philbrick(Talk) 02:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no question. The IP's edits here were clearly vandalism: changing all of the family names to Smith and Miller. - SummerPhDv2.0 03:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI
Talk:Boxing Day Test

message: Someone has introduced a "2006 events" section, which is fine, but begs the inclusion of notable events for all of the other BD tests, such as Warne's Hat Trick of 94, etc. I'll make a note to get started on it, but feel free to dive in. Manning 01:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Events

message: It certainly wasn't when the first one described in this article happened, in 1950, nor in 1952. There was another very strong "tradition" about scheduling matches (Test and Sheffield Shield) in place until at least the 1960s. To list those earlier matches as "Boxing Day Tests", when nobody called them that at the time, seems a bit odd. Since it's the name of the article, I would like to see some etymology of The Boxing Day Test. HiLo48 (talk) 23:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did calling it "The Boxing Day Test" really begin? 

message: The lead tells me the article is about "a cricket Test match held in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia involving the Australian cricket team and an opposing national team...", yet it has a section called "Other Boxing Day Tests" about matches that don't fit that definition. That makes no sense. I plan to remove it unless someone can convince me not to. HiLo48 (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logic problem
Talk:Centre de services scolaire des Portages-de-l'Outaouais

message: The next school board elections will take place on Sunday, November 2, 2014. The position of chairman will be chosen by universal suffrage. This will be for a three year term. The last school board elections took place in 2007.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.160.216.79 (talk) 21:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elections 
Talk:Ken Evoy

message: http://graphics.sitesell.com/other_graphics/toys_globe_article_supp.jpg
http://graphics.sitesell.com/other_graphics/toys_gazette_article_supp.gif
In addition to a more recent set of interviews on CJAD 800 AM's Peter Anthony Holder Show (Holder Overnight)...
http://www.cjad.com/
...this makes the SiteSell article both "verifiable" and "neutral" based on the Notability criteria...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability
This page has already been deleted and its history removed. I contest, based on the above (which covers both this article on the person as well as the person's company - Sitesell) that it be readded.Maltiti 01:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't comment on whether or not this page should have been deleted, but this is not the correct way to go about restoring it. I would contact and admin, such as User:The Epopt, and ask them to restore the page to your subpage, and ask them to take a look and tell you what was wrong with it, if anything. Thedreamdied 01:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ronz#Regarding_SiteSell_Corporate_username
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Akradecki#Regarding_Ken_Evoy
We seem to have caused a great deal of consternation by intuitively registering as SiteSell_Corporate, openly revealing potential COI.  If you review the history of that edit, you will see it was objective, early years' material.  We didn't know it was necessary to "register" and it seemed to us that if someone wanted to be clandestine, he would do so.  And if not, why not just register with an openly obvious username?  Sorry for violating the rules, there are just so many of them.
Subsequent edits (after ours, up to today) have made the article better, and we will leave you with our suggestions in the above two URLs.  The article was sent to Ken Evoy, who has confirmed it is accurate, with the recommendations made in our talk at the above two URLs.
But from now on, he suggested that we should stay out it.  We have never posted to "Ken Evoy" before, only one edit was made (an objective one).  So can you please remove the COI designation?
Thanks very much SiteSell Corporate 17:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  From SiteSell Corporate 
Talk:Rivastigmine

message: The paragraph about the patch is a bit of a stretch--can we remove it? I have seen stuff that says the side effect profile is down.  They presented at ICAD 2006 in Madrid.  --Chrispounds 01:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PK

message: "3 mg per day increment every 2 to 4 weeks" seem contradictory - how do you do something every day weekly?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.78.16.125 (talk) 01:28, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under "Administration"
Talk:His World

message: Just looks like a "stub." There may not be a lot of information, but there is information. GAMEchief 01:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: stub

message: Can someone who's more musically-minded help to flesh out the technical descriptions of the different versions? 81.137.159.61 15:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descriptions 

message: Now it's fleshed out, does it still need merging? If it does, I'd recommend it goes with the Several Wills article (or rename that to Sonic the the hedgehog (2006 Soundtrack), rather than the main Sonic 2006 article.
Removed merge notice, as no objections have been raised 81.149.182.210 21:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: link to the demo cut please???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.80.151.146 (talk) 01:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Piracy is illegal, and I don't know why you expected to find it on Wikipedia. Go buy the OST. - GAMEchief (talk) 02:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  demo cut??
Template talk:Declined

message: Hmm, given the relatively high profile of this (and other) CheckUser button, should they be permanently semi'd? – Chacor 01:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They're used alot but not in places where the template vandal is likely to get much satisfaction.  Still, a good idea, which I've copied to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Clerks/Noticeboard. Thatcher131 05:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Meowth's Party

message: I say it's a stub. I personally learned something from reading it. It may be a fake, but there's definately information here that a lot of people don't know. GAMEchief 01:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? It might be fake, but people learn from it? Sorry, that logic doesn't fly. If it isn't verifiably true, it may not remain here. Fan-1967 01:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The two sources provided on the page say this is a technical demo which could show what is to come. It doesn't say anything about it being another game. Drumpler 01:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical Demo

message: I rewrote a large portion of the article. I likewise removed the rewrite tag, as I now believe it meets Wiki criteria for having an encyclopedic tone. Drumpler 22:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I have likewise brought this article to the attention to the editors of the Pokémon Collaborative Project. I do not think much needs to be rewritten. I have removed speculation where I have found it. However, I think the article needs to be properly sourced. Drumpler 05:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pokémon Collaborative Project

message: So those sources mentioned in the AfD—where are they? Looks like this demo has mentions, but not significant coverage. Would it work better as a section in another article? czar ♔ 20:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Nikki Haley

message: ...is all over the media and should be added to his already mentioned previous tour. --2003:EA:E714:4E58:D0CB:2BA6:666:DDB5 (talk) 04:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Husband's current tour... 

message: I propose adding a new recording to Nikki Haley, as well as other politicians. More relevant voices are needed for politicians. I am not entirely familiar with the WikiCommons audio restrictions, so I’d have to find another one.
Suppose we use RFK Jr’s voice before his (condition/cancer?). Wouldn’t be very relevant.
Thoughts? IEditPolitics (talk) 23:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice: New recording in order?
Talk:Runamo

message: Umm, can we get a description?  Saxo's doesn't really tell me much; like, how big is it, how long, &c.?  It's fascinating...i want to know more! Lindsay 09:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article says that it is 34 "Danish ells". If a Danish ell is comparable to a Swedish ell, it is 17 metres long, or about 20 yards long.--Berig 09:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Amn't i reading Saxo correctly in talking about over hill-tops and along valley bottoms?  That's gotta be more than 17 metres.  Lindsay 20:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're right. I guess Saxo is talking of the entire dolerite dike (which may stretch for a very long distance), while the measurement I gave your refers to the famous stretch of "runes" that people visit. I haven't been there myself.--Berig 20:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Description

message: Andy Dingley (talk) 01:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article exclude the most obvious fact, the text of the claimed poem itself?
Talk:KNWC

message: Since the author hasnt contested, I will. It seems to be a notable local radio station. No reason to delete. Thedreamdied 01:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The split tag has been re-instated with the rationale "per MOS guidelines, joint AM/FM radio station articles are to be split." MOS does not appear to mention AM or FM. Can you please be more specific as to where this ruling is? and if it is so clear cut then why not just split the article? Op47 (talk) 14:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankyou Tdl1060 and Mifter. Op47 (talk) 11:46, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split tag 

message: Is the content on KNWC AM the same as on KNWC FM? Op47 (talk) 11:46, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification required
Talk:USS John P. Jackson

message: Replaced old blue infobox with photo with new light blue one, added addional info in box, plus moved photo to new infobox.
Added intro paragraph describing ship's career.
Added second photo in text, showing ship in fleet.
Wikified entire page after verifying data with DANFS.
Added "see also," ref, minor edits, fixes, links, etc. Wikited (talk) 23:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page
Talk:Table of stars with Bayer designations

message: Do we really need this table? Every Bayer designation (including Latin lowercase and uppercase letters plus superscripts) are listed in the list of stars by constellation articles.--JyriL talk 01:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see a need for it. Regards, RJH (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

text: Yes it is incomplete. Regards, RJH (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it still incomplete?  Lithopsian (talk) 16:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we really need this table?

message: I've made some fairly significant changes to the layout of the tables.  I've removed the individual horizontal scrollbars for each table.  I've also modified the first table so that each individual Bayer designation does not wrap.  The table is quite a lot wider, but it was already wider than any reasonable page.  The table now is likely to be less than a page long on many devices.  Mostly though, it is just easier to read, especially where there are superscripts on multiple stars with the same designation.  I'll give it a while to see if there are huge objections then do the rest.  Lithopsian (talk) 16:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good changes -- the single table format is much better. -- Elphion (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout changes