Talk:NATO Response Force

message: OK, I suspect someone from NATO HQ has edited this page. Look at the external link (NATO Review article) that I added. NRF hasn't been even remotely as shiny as this wikipedia article claims. Its strength is (even according to NATO) UP TO 25,000 personnel, not APPROXIMATELY 25,000 personnel. It's as far as I know far below target strength (and has lost political priority) because of the stress that Iraq/Afghanistan rotations place on NATO forces. Lastdingo (talk) 21:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like NRF hit a high point around 2006-2007.  It is still mentioned in articles on the NATO site, but is hardly a popular topic.  I cleaned up some of the text in which the NATO ice cream cone was licking itself (and admiring how great the taste was). Cheers, W. B. Wilson (talk) 17:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can somebody tell me what use a force would be that was not "deployable"? The crap these corporate warriors speak nowadaysJF42 (talk) 20:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...it shows great promise to be an effective military tool." 

message: When I clicked on note four I could only get a '404' notice. Anyone know why?
RASAM (talk) 15:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No link

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.army-technology.com/contractors/missiles/nato.html
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on NATO Response Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150414014221/http://www.aco.nato.int/page349011837.aspx to http://aco.nato.int/page349011837.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060420121817/http://www.ndu.edu/ctnsp/Def_Tech/DTP%2018%20NATO%20Response%20Force.pdf to http://www.ndu.edu/CTNSP/Def_Tech/DTP%2018%20NATO%20Response%20Force.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)