lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fred Grossinger

message: On 3 January 2008, Steam5 said in the edit summary that "He did not host a game show on his appearance" and removed the category "American game show hosts".  However the imdb entry for "Girl in My Life" (1973) shows that he was the host of that program.  Does Steam5 have a more reliable source that contradicts that? Or does Steam5 have problems with the fact that "Girl in My Life" was only loosely a "game show", even though the contestants did walk away with prizes? --Bejnar (talk) 04:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know who is Fred Grossinger and I don't know the show "Girl in My Life". And I believe the show "Girl in My Life" is not a game show. It was a non-fiction and a classic reality show. According to Internet Movie Database. I'm telling you it is not a game show. Please do not send me a message. Steam5 (talk) 05:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to another website, faqs.org, It was a loosely or a half game show. It was on "List of U.S. game shows". I apologize for my disagreement on a game show. On the previous mesaage just ignore the previous message. So, I apologize for my disagreement. Steam5 (talk) 06:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So I have reinstated the category "American game show hosts". --Bejnar (talk) 06:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Game show host

message: Notes and References are different.  See Wikipedia:Citing sources#General references versus inline citations.  In this case  Weiskind, Ron (29 November 1995) "Fred Holliday: Actor who feasted on commercials" Pittsburgh Post-Gazette page B-6 is not an external link, it is the major general reference for information about Fred Grossinger.  It also occurs as the specific source for a couple of in-line citations that are footnotes (Notes).  Other sources also appear in the footnotes that are not general references.  --Bejnar (talk) 05:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes and References
Talk:Uti possidetis

message: Uti_Possidetis_Juris and Uti_possidetis should be merged.  Mathiastck 22:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: This article needs a reference to the United Nations Charter in particular article 2 . The way it is written people are referencing Uti possidetis as the current ultimate rule of law when in fact it is not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.106.103 (talk) 01:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 2015

message: Should this article mention the UN policy that borders can't change through war? 2601:600:8500:5B1:218:E7FF:FE7D:6AFA (talk) 09:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Nations? 

message: I am totally re-writing this article (with proper sources), since no-one else will.  I imagine I'll be another fortnight at least.  If anyone is interested to collaborate, let me know.Ttocserp 14:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Kapluk

message: ...as evidenced by this. GregorB 22:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks for clearing it up. -- intgr 08:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a hoax...
Talk:Nan River

message: There are two different specifications of the length of the Nan River: within the "Infobox River" you have: "length = 390 km (234 mi)", in the text you have: "The Nan river runs about 390 miles south."
In the Thai Wikipedia (:th:แม่น้ำน่าน) there is even a third value:"length =615 กิโลเมตร".
So, what is the correct length? And where did you get that value from? --hdamm (talk) 12:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of the Nan 
Talk:The King's Way (novel)

message: I need more time to finish this page. There is a lot more info that I would like to add. 
The book is based on considerable documentation coming from very reliable sources and relying on writings often unedited of the Marquise de Maintenon.
I am not sure about the language restrictions. I am not sure if the book was translated to English, and the title in English is just a translation of the French title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoradler5 (talk • contribs) 
:No problem, you've successfully added enough info to justify the book's notability. The page won't be deleted - sorry for jumping on it so quickly. Since you've created a duplicate page at :The Alley of the King, however, I'm going to redirect this article to there. It contains a little more information than this version does. Hersfold (talk/work) 22:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy of discussions from [[:The Avenue of The King]]
Talk:Listed buildings in Runcorn (urban area)

message: Is there any particular reason why the article is called Listed buildings in Runcorn, Cheshire rather just than Listed buildings in Runcorn? Nev1 (talk) 16:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  It's just that I created it when I was very young and even more ignorant about WP matters than I am now.  Time for a move? Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the article as (I think) there's only one settlement called Runcorn in the UK, the only country to use have "listed buildings". Nev1 (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, not the only country to have listed buildings.  See table of historic site registers at wp:HSITES.  But, yes, probably only combo of "listed buildings" + "Runcorn". doncram (talk) 21:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List name
Talk:William Smellie (encyclopedist)

message: "As of 15 October 1968, Smellie was survived by his great-great-grandson Richard Smellie, who in turn had two sons."
Surely this kind of information is irrelevant to a biography of the man concerned? DermottBanana (talk) 07:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold and remove it if you feel that it is irrelevant. You don't need permission to make changes here. -- Mattinbgn\talk 06:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stretching the bounds of 'relevance'? 

message: Should we charact5erise bell's engravings thus? Rich Farmbrough, 15:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In principle I don't have a particular problem with it - the fact that they were censored is a pointer, and it suggests why they were censored rather than for conveying military secrets or whatever. In any case the specific word may well be supported by the offline reference. FlagSteward (talk) 13:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Prurient?
Talk:Intellectual property in China

message: *Wikipedia:External_links#Links normally to be avoided - Item 11 says blogs should be avoided unless linked to a recognized authority. Reason being, blogs are subject to change, frequently are not monitored and are not reliable sources. Recommend deletion. Morenooso 22:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blogs as external links - please see [[Wikipedia:External_links#Links normally to be avoided]] 

message: Due to the glaring lack of any discussion on what has been a controversial topic in China - the lack of respect for IP - I am putting a POV tag up.  TastyCakes (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some much-needed viewpoint in the top article. I think it's not unlikely that this article is "maintained" by people who would prefer to ignore the fact that China churns out, well, chinese copies of just about anything that can be churned out. AniRaptor2001 (talk) 20:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased nature of the article

message: *22 July 2010, EU reports growth in fake goods from China, BBC
May be of relevance. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 03:08, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counterfeit goods in China 

message: Do national government works get copyright like in the UK or become public domain like in the U.S.? -- Beland (talk) 03:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also curious. — LlywelynII 12:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the US Federal Government position is unique, as far as I know. As the state sector in China remains very large, copyright law would be largely ineffective if it didn't cover government works.--Jack Upland (talk) 23:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government copyright? 

message: The article doesn't answer this. You might say it's a Communist country. But see Copyright law of the Soviet Union.--Jack Upland (talk) 23:36, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi @Jack Upland, it's been eight years since you posed this question. I've recently made some efforts to address this. Take a read if you like and let me know if specific questions remain. JArthur1984 (talk) 14:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.--Jack Upland (talk) 00:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about before 1979? 

message: This further reading list seems a bit indiscriminate. Are there strong opinions on what to include? As the article has developed significantly over the past 18 months or so, this list seems less useful. JArthur1984 (talk) 14:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strong feelings on the Further Reading list?
Talk:Noble Johnson

message: The article currently gives his birth name as Mark Noble and states that he was also known as Noble Johnson. The only citation is to a user-generated bio on FindAGrave which is itself unsupported by any evidence. That is backwards and contrary to all other treatments on the external links cited including IMDb, as well as being incompatible with the fact that the only other source cited is the oral history by his brother, George Johnson. 
-- DS1953 talk 04:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth name vs. also known as...
Talk:Lefebvre

message: *"as a middle name": No. --Wetman 01:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It would be nice if someone familiar with the name could write how it is pronounced. Thanks! -Oreo Priest 14:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA 

message: The intro ends with "It may refer to:", and the rest of the article is a continuation of this sentence. As far as I know, it contradicts the overall tone of Wikipedia. Can it be changed?--Adûnâi (talk) 00:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic style
Talk:Fred Swan

message: Where's the critical commentary? As of right now I don't think what you have is enough. That said, if you add more picture with some solid commentary, I think it'll round out the article rather well. Thoughts? SERSeanCrane 03:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no clue how to get a work into the article. I've been looking at other artist's work, like that of Pablo Picasso, Salvadore Dali, and M.C. Escher, and it seems that their works are licensed under fair use, which states that the image is used in proper context, and you can't print it or anything else like that. So, could I get a pic from a website and then license it as fair use? Bmrbarre 13:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the license, if you provide "critical commentary" about the art in question, it will be covered under fair use for en.wiki. SERSeanCrane 13:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I have woven in some commentary. TerriersFan 01:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Licensing for Picture
Talk:Illinois Central College

message: replaced the former article with a very messy cut-and-paste with all the former content removed, no wikilinks, no categories, no Commons link, broken formatting everywhere, backwards-numbered references that didn't match their footnotes, footnotes that didn't verify the claims, and plenty of happy-talk marketing and trivia about ICC — and, just by coincidence, yet again a big section about Woodview Commons, an apartment complex that "multiple people", all new users, have decided really, really needs a big section complete with commercial product details.  (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodview commons, and maybe Talk:Woodview commons while it still exists.)  Anyway, I've now rewritten the whole article, using only the non-trivial, verifiable parts from both former editions, and added references for the whole thing.  It needed it anyway.  Commentary is welcome.  (Except for "Don't you realize that the 350-person apartment building I work is the most important thing about the 11,000-student college next to it?!" — uh, yeah.)  --Closeapple (talk) 08:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrote article properly after messy overwrite
Talk:August Köhler

message: The statement  `This in turn allows the condenser to be focused on to specimen' is surely wrong: the condenser is focused on the pupil of the objective lens. The whole idea is to provide collimated light at all points on the specimen to maximize the resolution.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.71.134 (talk) 10:58, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
File talk:Georgia Aquarium - Cuttlefish Jan 2006.jpg

message: Does anyone know where I can find some good information about marine biology? This website is awesome so I printed all of it but if anyone knows where I can find more information please post a note on this website. Thankyou, A Dedicated Student Biologist --75.60.114.199 22:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the information here is from Nova. Nova had a really interesting program called "King of Camauflage", whose website can be found in the reference section of the article, or going to http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/camo/. It was one of the best and most interesting Nova episodes I've seen. Check out libraries near you to see if they have that Nova episode. I know a lot of libraries keep a collection of Nova episodes. Granted, this won't do you much good for a project, because you probably finished it since February (not much happens on [most] Image discussion pages), but it's great if you're still interested.
Now that that's answered, I have a question for you, or anyone else looking at the picture. What are those two cuttlefish doing to each other? Kevin 22:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Says here they're "interacting" which is the most delightful euphemism for "fucking" I've ever heard.220.14.50.162 (talk) 13:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored and there are plenty of words we can use like "copulating" which are good scientifically and not vulgar. Interacting means just that. Why exactly they are doing this we do not know, but it could for example be a dominance thing, not a sexual thing, or many other kinds of behavior. Invertzoo (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:SSH tunnel

message: merge -- Scraimer 22:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: there's already a section on that page. --Walter Görlitz 23:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, not exactly. It's mentioned a couple times, but doesn't have a section unto itself. There's actually a better mention of SSH tunnels at Tunneling_protocol, and I think it might be more appropriate to merge it there. -- Nic Waller 10:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with SSH?
Talk:Peter Baptist and Companions

message: Martyrs of Japan
It looks to me that this article and Martyrs of Japan cover the same territory. We only need one of them. Personally, I prefer the name Martyrs of Japan, as it seems to me (possibly?) to be the one the non-Catholic groups venerating these people use, but I would accept merger under either name. John Carter 14:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You certainly can't merge in the other direction, since there's a long list of other martyrs on this page too. I wouldn't mind merging Peter Baptist into this one - or moving most the material of this particular group to the other article. --Alvestrand 17:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: *Comment -- if everyone is in favor, as it would seem, I will begin work on the merge in the next week or so.  I will also add the merge tag to Paul Miki and see what the consensus is there. jackturner3 20:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merges
Talk:Villar Perosa aircraft submachine gun

message: I think that the rate of fire is "only" 1200 rounds per minute. "The great book of guns" (Salamander Books 2004) says that..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.154.107.15 (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See ; at minimun it needs to separate the AAMG from the handheld SMG; they had different rates of fire etc. The Skoda built M.18 was a clone of the latter using Austrian ammo etc., etc. Someone not using his real name (talk) 10:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is terrible 

message: the Villar-Perosa M1915 is considered a machine gun and not a submachine gun  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.65.25.116 (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  a notice
Talk:Sensient Technologies

message: I have found enough information on news websites, etc to, i believe, warrant a controversy section. I have started this off but will make a better effort on it when I have the time. If anyone else would like to research and expand on this at anypoint that would also be cool. I've added 2 references to the section already but there's a lot more information out there on this. Danno81 (talk) 10:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh they are so going to sue you ;) Wjousts (talk) 18:53, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh no! I think you're right... *runs and hides* Danno81 (talk) 13:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section
Talk:Castlebellingham

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://bellinghamroot.tripod.com/bellingh/castleb.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Yeeno  (talk) 🍁 02:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Iconix Entertainment

message: Large sections seem lifted from http://iconix.co.kr/eng/aboutus01.htm
The previous comment was posted by unsigned user User:Scraimer
:: You're right - the article directly lifts from that source. I've removed them.
:: Guroadrunner 00:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright ? 
Talk:Pixar Image Computer

message: If in the prior section PICs stopped being used in 1995, then most of these films and this section is irrelevant to the Image Computer and more appropriate just for the corporation page.  It might be OK for PIC relevant films. 21:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: PAS Section irrelevant to the Image Computer

message: This article uses the phrase "perfect images of the human body". The use of the word "perfect" sounds like marketing-speak. How could the images be perfect? It should be changed to something more appropriate. Tweisbach (talk) 01:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  perfect images of the human body
Talk:Space Odyssey (TV series)

message: I've seen this series twice (on the UKTV Documentary channel) but I didn't see any mention of a Titan probe. Was this particular bit cut to make room for adverts or something? — jammycakes (t) 23:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I imagine it was, since it sure as hell happened on the DVD and BBC airing. 82.19.8.137 18:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Shame. Adverts suck big time when they do things like that. — jammycakes (t) 08:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titan probe? 

message: what is about this magnet field generator mentioned. can someone more about??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.244.173.220 (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  magnet field generator 

message: This sounds strangely like a slightly altered version of a book I had as a schoolkid in the mid 90s, with the exception that it was written more in the style of a travelogue/brochure for an extremely expensive around-the-solar-system cruise that the reader could win (had won?) instead of it following a more commercial/state sponsored working expedition, and ended with a bonus jaunt out to a newly established and very basic Proxima Centauri colony (by unspecified means) instead of at Pluto (plus a transfer from Earth to a 2001-esque space station in a Skylon-like spaceplane, then transferring from there to the docked cruiser)... In fact, even the title is pretty similar if not exactly the same. Wonder if there's actually any overlap somehow? 51.7.49.61 (talk) 03:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find anything via google, and there seems nothing related at Stars and planetary systems in fiction#Proxima Centauri (Alpha Centauri C). Barring any direct involvement (eg learning that someone worked on both the book you describe and the screenplay) I would say there's probably not enough to add anything to the article, —BillC talk 10:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  earlier version of the book?
Talk:Barat College

message: A history of Barat College by Martha Curry, RSCJ is nearing completion, and will be a valuable resource for this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peramica (talk • contribs) 01:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: upcoming history
Talk:St. Michael Catholic Secondary School

message: I think the article is shaping up rather well.  I don't quite like the way I've organized it though; and having dates for different events would be nice (when doherty became principal, etc. etc.).  If we could find a picture of the building copyright free, that would be awesome (the infobox I put in has a place for an image).  Citing sources would be nice too; but I don't know where we could ever find information online about the school... the school's website doesn't even have their phone number!
Other than that, I think we just need more information as we can think of it/collect it.  
Thanks for the help guys!Binksy2k 18:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Princess cut

message: There should be an actual picture of the cut diamond shape. Angie Y. 23:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The actual shape

message: This article should be linked and/or incorporated with the main article on Diamond cuts  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.235.153.101 (talk) 15:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link with Main Article 

message: This article may be more properly named "Princess (Diamond cut)"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.235.153.101 (talk) 15:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Template talk:New Jersey Devils roster

message: Julien and Lamorello, should be in the template. GoodDay 21:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Forget it, this is the 'current' template (ie post 2006-07 season, currently). GoodDay 21:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Head Coach, fo 2006-07 season

message: Is he on the IR or just a scratch? The NHL Gameday roster has him listed as a scratch; if he's on the IR he would not be listed like Salvador & Rolston are not listed Raul17 (talk) 00:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Fraser
Talk:Dance Craze

message: in the article it says the running time is 50 minutes. i don't know where thats from but my dvd version of the film is about an hour and 24 minutes long. anybody know the exact running time? for now i'll update it to the one on the dvd. if anyone has any objections, feel free to replace it.
Glassbreaker5791 (talk) 19:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  running time? 