lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dorothy Quincy

message: Dorothy Quincy is memorialized today in the Dorothy Quincy Suite a theater and ballroom complex in the old John Hancock tower, long a Boston landmark. As the Hancock Hall and Dorothy Quincy Suite are an on-going commercial venture I am uncertain as to the extent, if any, to which it is appropriate to mention them directly. --Brons 11:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  There are other living histories and/or portrayals which we might add.  The word "today" is meaningless without a date.  "long a Boston landmark" should also be deleted or several footnotes added (big grin). --Rcollman (talk) 15:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial venture

message: In addition to Wives of the Signers, Dorothy is also the subject of Dorothy Quincy, wife of John Hancock: With events of her time by Ellen C. D. Q Woodbury, of which I do not have a copy. Her account of the Battle of Lexington comes to us through General William H. Sumner and was published in the New England Historical and Genealogical Register, VIII p. 188, which I do not have to hand. --Brons 18:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That biographical book establishes notability of the subject (see the guideline WP:BIO). I have removed the warning tag and added the book as a reference. (I only found the title of the book in databases, I do not actually have access to it.) To improve the article, further sources shold be added, and sources should be cited in the text. --B. Wolterding 17:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed the lack of citation banner from the main page. (I personally find that to be an inappropriate place for it. The discussion page is better.) I did not find a sub heading with specifics about the need for it. I have put in a couple more references.  The General Sumner's diary has a lengthly passage attributed to Dorothy and has been published in many places, I added another.  The genealogical record could come from any number of researchers and individual sources.  I refrained from citing the census records of 1790 and 1800.  I did not cite Boston Marriages for James Scott, nor  100 orators of Boston that also has some wonderful information about Madam Scott.  I found lots of material in google books, now part of the public record. --Rcollman (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference- Wives of the Signers
Talk:Panthers (band)

message: I'm not going to claim that this band is certainly notable, but the associations with Orchid and Vice should qualify as an "assertion" and suggest that this article has a reasonable chance of growing into something better. P4k 11:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm going to add more about this, I just wanted to get the basic idea up there since there are a lot of articles that link to this band, (orchid, etc.)  They are promintent in the Brooklyn, NY scene, but I'm looking for ways to identify that factually.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nathanangelo (talk • contribs) 11:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read WP:MUSIC, it will show you the notability guidlines of wikipedia, you will need to source websites in to prove this RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 11:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm working on it
Talk:Seymour Burr

message: I created this page after watching my step-daughter attempt to do research on Seymour Burr for a class project. The information we found was scarce, poorly written and much of it was plagiarized from one site to the next. I also found that asking students to research and represent Mr. Burr at a US middle-school level in a 'Town Meeting' context seems to be a typical lesson plan, and several posts from students indicated that they were having difficulty finding good information for this assignment.
Finding no page on Mr. Burr within Wikipedia yet, I did my best here to sum up what appears to be the accepted information about Mr. Burr from the several sources that I could find, avoiding any direct quotes from those sites. I hope that others will contribute better source information over time now that this page exists.
John 11:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Genesis

message: The article states:
On 5 April 1781, Seymour enlisted in the connecticut Seventh Regiment, led by Colonel John Brooks. He fought at Bunker Hill and Fort Catskill
Can anyone clarify this?  The battle at Bunker Hill was in 1775, 6 years before Seymour enlisted.
Mingusboodle (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology

message: "Military service" section:
"On 5 April 1781, Seymour enlisted in the Massachusetts Seventh Regiment, led by Colonel John Brooks. He fought at Bunker Hill and Fort Catskill, and suffered through the long winter at Valley Forge."
The Battle of Bunker Hill was June 17, 1775. Otr500 (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline problem
Talk:First Consolidated Bank

message: The article is also made by a programmer at this bank, as clearly stated on his page by Snowolf (talk) on 11:34, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Austrian commando frogmen

message: This article is a translation of :de:Kampfschwimmer#Kampfschwimmer in Österreich, which was written by the German Wikipedia user :de:Benutzer:84.114.137.105. I have left a message in :de:Benutzer Diskussion:84.114.137.105 and :de:Diskussion:Kampfschwimmer asking him to answer here saying where he got this information from. Anthony Appleyard 12:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This unit really doesn't sem notable enough to have it's own article. I'd suggest moving the (small amount of) information across to Military of Austria and leave this page to be deleted. The Kinslayer 12:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, it strikes me that having sources that are in German on the English wikipedia isn't the best idea. The Kinslayer 13:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion query
Talk:Leigh Broxham

message: yes broxham is well'ard. changed.Ben0009 12:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Countries in the International Organization for Standardization

message: This will be a table, containing all recognized countries, their ISO member status, year joined, Standards Body, and other details.
I know it is  a mess right now, so please do not link it to the article yet.
Jerry lavoie 12:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What will this be?

message: At some point this page should be renamed.  According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions, names that suggest a hierarchy of articles should not be used. Khatru2 08:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested rename 

message: The table currently features country name, and 3 identifiers from ISO norm 3166: the 2 letter abbreviation; the 3 letter abbreviation and the numeric identifier… I suggest to remove the 2-letter and numerical identifier (as the others are covered complete at ISO 3166); and to add the year of entrance into the system; as well as any changes in membership status…. Ideas? L.tak (talk) 17:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds reasonable. I'd remove the A3 column as well - I don't see that it adds any value here. Mitch Ames (talk) 07:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Table content
Talk:Giorgio Santelli

message: John Styers, in his book Cold Steel, a hand-to-hand combat manual for the U.S. Marine Corps, ackowledges "George Santelli". It would be good if we had more about this collaboration.
198.212.208.14 (talk) 01:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santelli and Styers 
Talk:Expressivism

message: I'm trying to clean up and organize meta-ethic articles, in particular the list(s) of theories on the meta-ethics page, and I'm wondering how to categorize expressivism. It is obviously at least a form of non-cognitivism, but given what existing article say, I'm not seeing any room for a non-expressivist form of non-cognitivism; that is, they appear to be two terms for the same thing. The page on non-cognitivism, in the section labelled "Varieties of non-cognitivism", lists emotivism and universal prescriptivism and then follows with a sentence beginning "Expressivism (encapsulating emotivism and prescriptivism) including Simon Blackburn's quasi-realism and Allan Gibbard's norm-expressivism...". That would seem to wrap every form of non-cognitivism under the expressivist banner. I'm going to add a merger template for these two articles, and unless anyone can express any good reasons not to merge them, I'll go ahead and complete the merger. Please comment. If you approve of this merger, please comment whether you think the resulting article should have the Non-cognitivist title or the Expressivist title in the name space. -Pfhorrest (talk) 05:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am weakly to mildly opposed to merger, on the grounds that while there is some overlap between the concepts, and that there is some historical precedence for the interchangeability between the use of the words, it is all largely inconsistent.  Both articles show (expressivism better than non-cognitivism) how there is a history of the development of the two ideas which might be argued to be "drastic" (that's too strong a word).  I would like to see a modern cited reference showing the relation between the two words, or showing the interchangeability of the two words before I agree to merger.  However until then the merger tag should remain.  Otherwise, I might consider the merger to be "original research" based on merely interpreting the concepts as outline on the two pages.
^ This dude is wrong. Just wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.161.133.2 (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference from non-cognitivism? 

message: Why is the argument from queerness listed as one for expressivism? Mackie seems to regard moral statements as cognitive, but false, in that moral facts would be queer sorts of things if they were true. The only angle I can imagine for the development of queerness here would be Ayer's later writings, where he says supportive things about Mackie's position. I doubt he uses Mackie's argument, though.131.96.91.66 (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Should Mackie be here?

message: — Assignment last updated by RudyCarnap (talk) 12:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHIL 390 Contemporary Philosophy
Talk:Sin offering

message: Why is this article's name Sin-offering when the term is "sin offering" throughout the article. Indeed, "Sin Offering" redirects here.24.27.60.81 12:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it right to call a sacrificial animal a "victim"? Lilaac (talk) 02:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Victim

message: Why does this article say (in the section on 'Ritual') that the offering was burnt on the roof of the altar? BobKilcoyne (talk) 06:25, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Roof of the temple
Talk:One Per Desk

message: Agreed. Letdorf 12:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Job done. Letdorf 11:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Merlin Tonto]] 

message: Added a photo, and removed the request. KingDaveRa (talk) 10:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Photo
Talk:CryptoLogic

message: The nature of this article was never intended to be one of advertising, thinly-veiled or otherwise. It's intention was to be an article detailing an accurate background of the company and how it has progressed over time with relevance to industry competitors, such as Playtech and Microgaming. I have seen articles on these companies but found them to be far too simple and, in my opinion, not comprehensive enough. All of the information is factual, objective and thoroughly researched. Please advise me more specifically in the areas where the article can be improved.ElNino77 12:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think even if it isn't advertisement, you'd still have a difficult time establishing notability.  -Taco325i 18:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, the problem is that all the information in the article comes directly from the company or its employees (presumably, since no sources were cited) and that's not neutral.  The best way to fix this is to cite reliable sources such as reviews in business magazines, newspapers, etc.  ColourBurst 23:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading
Talk:Muse (Candy Lo album)

message: :"MUSE (pronounced "Em-Yu-Ess-Ee," as if it were titled "M.U.S.E") 
No trace of this in sources found, and article unsourced. Cover clearly written "Muse" In ictu oculi (talk) 15:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced
Talk:Peter Hudson

message: I remember reading, I think in Robert Walls book on Tassie Footy players that Hudson was kept goaless on a 4th occassion, during his last state game. He retired from state games after that because he was kept goaless. Can any body confirm this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.135.162 (talk) 01:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: goal less record
Talk:List of registered political parties in Spain by geographic location

message: Hi Madmedea. I was just wondering what your thinking was behind removing the italics from the Spanish names (non-English words are usually italicised)  and "un-wikifying" the dates. Without the links to dates everyone has to put up with the same date format. With them, we all see dates as we wish. Am I missing something? Avalon 12:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Italics & Dates
Template talk:Convair/GD aircraft

message: I added General Dynamics aircraft (F-111, F-16 & F-16 variants) here since GD does not have an aircraft template and because Convair was acquired by GD and operated as a aircraft division for several years. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. - BillCJ (talk) 02:57, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Dynamics
Talk:Life in Cold Blood

message: The BBC Press Office release is to provide the media with information on upcoming programmes. It is not there to be copied wholesale, and should certainly not amount to an an entire Wikipedia article. The David Attenborough 'Life' articles have a consistent style and approach to their content — see Life on Earth for an example. Please do not rewrite articles without discussion first. At least wait until the series is broadcast and allow the article to grow properly. Chris 42 (talk) 23:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Press Office 

message: Anyone know for sure if this is going to be in HD or not? Sky News say it is but an anon editing from a BBC IP address claims that's a mistake. I've checked the listings for BBC HD and 'Life...' isn't listed, but it seems a bit strange that they wouldn't have filmed it (or at least more recent scenes) in HD. AlexJ (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 17:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: High-Def or not?

message: From "Episodes", "1. The Cold Blooded Truth": "The largest living reptile is the leatherback turtle." Attenborough does indeed say that, but I believe that the statement is wrong: List of largest reptiles. Axl ¤ [Talk] 12:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the text. Axl ¤ [Talk] 02:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leatherback turtle 
Talk:Alfredo Cariello

message: The fee was not clearly shown in Crotone's bilancio, which only a lump sum of co-ownership cost of €50,000 apparently from Cariello (undisclosed) and Nazzareno Tarantino (€500). Thus the fee may be even lower, as Chievo may included other fee to the contract residual value of Cariello in July 2007 as shown in 2008 bilancio. --Matthew_hk tc 14:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Crotone
Talk:Coherence therapy

message: Coherence therapy is to see a symptom as a solution (or an attempt at solution) to a problem existing in the unconscious (emotional learning formed earlier in life.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nashoomoo (talk • contribs) 21:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  this wiki page is not the whole picture of coherence therapy
Talk:Marianne Vos

message: The file :c:File:2004 UCI Road World Championships – Junior women's road race.jpg used in this article has been deleted from Commons
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 07:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: File Deleted from Commons
Talk:Midwinter (video game)

message: Created Bassophile 12:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Image registration

message: "A basic image similarity-based method consists of a transformation model, which is applied to reference image coordinates to locate their corresponding coordinates in the target image space"
-> i thougt the transformation is applied to the target image and the reference image is unchanged ...
Reply: Although there are some individuals/systems who take the approach of applying transformations to the target image, I believe that it is generally preferred to do so to the reference image. Transformations are lossy (there is information lost in the process) and reference images can often have an order of magnitude more information given their significantly higher resolution. Therefore it is preferable to not further degrade the target image information by applying a transformation to it but rather to the reference image which may result in a transformation path that does not degrade the information in the target image at all. [Disclaimer: I am just starting to investigate the algorithms involved so this information may be inaccurate - please correct me as needed.] Gfariello 19:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The author gives cross-correlation and mutual information as examples of similarity-based methods.  If I recall correctly, these examples are also sometimes referred to as template matching registration algorithms.  Is this the case, or is my memory muddled?  Lemasterda 19:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity-Based Methods 

message: I cleaned-up the references with some wikipedia guidance to use in-line references.  However, the article is still woefully lacking in citations.  I'm not sure what among the external links should really be citaitons or not.
I also added a section on uncertainty analysis since that's what I'm really interested in.  If there is a more appropriate place or if there are better references for that, please add away....ComputerScience101 (talk) 18:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup & Uncertainty 

message: I added a reference to Wohlberg's paper on log polar registration. Ckelloug (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Reference to Wohlberg
Talk:Missa Caput

message: Very nice job.  I will add a link to Rob Wegman's page which has midi files of the missae caput. One tiny suggestion - would you consider giving a little more prominence in the article to the Ockeghem and Obrecht settings? rclb
:Thanks!  yes, actually I was planning on doing separate pages on the Ockeghem and Obrecht settings.  I have a good source on the Ockeghem but am still hunting around for one on the Obrecht (maybe that "Life for the Muses" biography has something, but I don't have a copy at the moment).  Antandrus  (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cromorne

message: Sorry about the lack of references.  I was very new to Wikipedia when I created this article, but I do hope to return and at least make a good list of sources at some point.  I have also been meaning to add a discography list to the page.  There are only two recordings I know of that have a bass cromorne in them, and I own both.  The instrument used in those recordings was built quite recently, patterned after illustrations and the surviving "contrabass oboes" from the time that were probably cromornes, possibly with modifications...
The French Wikipedia page on Cromorne clearly shows that Cromorne and Crumhorn are the same thing, and that Tournebout also means the same.Johnrotter (talk) 17:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is likely because in modern French they do indeed appear to mean the same thing.  However, the research of Bruce Haynes, Marc Ecochard (see http://www.grandhautbois-flutes.com/), and others indicate that this was not always true, and wasn't true in the 17th century at least.  I'll admit it is confusing and especially with regards to the organ stop--what instrument exactly was/is/are they meant to imitate?  However, in Haynes' book The Eloquent Oboe he reproduces a technical drawing from a French encyclopedia, I believe, showing an instrument that looks like a bass/contrabass oboe but labeled "cromorne."  It was published long after the extinction of the crumhorn.  I'll probably be revisiting music of that period again and maybe will be able to post that image, as it has got to be in the public domain...  the_paccagnellan (talk) 10:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cromorne and Crumhorn

message: Article is supposedly about the cromorne, but the main body of it, the first paragraph, is about the crumhorn (which already has it's own article) the second paragraph is about the hecklephone, and what influenced it (it is made unclear what "these instruments" is supposed to mean in that context) only the _first_ sentence of the lead-in text describes the actual topic of article, rest of it is again about the "crumhorn". --CatCat (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  article not actually about cromorne
Talk:Professor emeritus

message: This was redirected to Professor, but I believe Emeritus makes more sense. Emeritus links to Professor, but Professor does not like to Emeritus. Clerks 13:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the redirect to Professor#Professor emeritus, since this is what Professor emeritus redirects to. Labongo (talk) 16:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Changed back to Emeritus as Professor#Professor emeritus doesn't exist anymore. Nolookingca (talk) 20:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

text: It was reinstated. I changed it to #REDIRECT Professor#Retired faculty, which is more useful and includes a link to the page Emeritus anyway. The capitalised Professor Emeritus, Emeritus professor and Emeritus Professor, should all go to the same place. – Fayenatic London 07:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Rockpalast

message: Will someone PLEASE add some more information about the show itself, including who produces it, how it is produced, its history, etc. Unfortunately, Ich sprechen Deutsch nicht sehr gut. 
Gladmax 13:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoa keep your pants on! Asking nicely probably helps more and may have inspired someone in the last 4 years to actually do it. I'll translate some bits off of German Rockpalast page soon, but sadly that page doesn't tell everything about the people behind it etc. either. -- Eddyspeeder (talk) 11:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information 

message: You forgot Radiohead http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98en3KeHG14&feature=related  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.3.104.185 (talk) 12:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done ;-) The list is far from complete, so any suggestions to expand the list are welcome. Of course you may also add them yourself. -- Eddyspeeder (talk) 11:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radiohead 

message: What about adding NOFX to the list? Didn't find it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYS_OWxgosY&feature=related  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMG..Bock (talk • contribs) 17:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOFX 

message: Of course he didn't ever perform Rockpalaßt, so I deleted him fr. the artists list.  
Solo (merely 19 gigs) he didn't ever play Europe.  
Concertarchives.org and his Official Website (fr. his wife) obviously prove it.  
The WDR site is "wrong" in this.  
And it's nice to be right. 
84.25.41.231 (talk) 13:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Harrison