lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bollywood Movie Awards

message: I hope someone can cleanup this article to follow the Manual of Style, as well as adding references. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 03:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: In the awards section, there is a whole lot of links to articles that just seem to contain the list and nothing else. Perhaps we should merge the articles into this article? EternalNub (talk) 21:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. I did the merging myself. EternalNub (talk) 22:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential merger of articles.
Talk:Bombay Samachar

message: Hi guys,
I've checked the website of the page, but except for the menus, everything seems to be in Gujarati. The pages of the paper which we can read are all in Gujarati as well. So, does the newspaper have only few publications in English that are strictly offline, or is it by mistake that in WP it says that the newspaper is both in Gujarati and English? If it's the latter, it would be better to remove the English-language newspaper category from the article and correct the information.
Thanks in advance --Universal Life (talk) 12:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  English?
Talk:The Stanford Review

message: This article was AfD'd but there is not AfD tag here. In any case, the AfD was discussed at The Stanford Review.
:*Ryan Tracey (Editor-in-Chief), "Editor's Note: Wikipedia Wars", The Stanford Review, Volume XXXVII, Issue 3, October 13, 2006. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stbalbach (talk • contribs) 
:This article was included in a batch of articles nominated for deletion, see walled garden. I found the AfD discussion here. Likely, half of the other articles in the batch are missing AfD tags too. Maybe I'll mosey over in their direction.... Xaxafrad 23:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD news story 

message: "By 1987, Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition inspired a coalition of Stanford students that put forth a set of demands called the Rainbow Agenda.[2] The Stanford Review was founded partly to provide an alternative viewpoint.[3]"
I couldn't understand what the Review had to do with Jesse Jackson. I thought "an alternative viewpoint" was meant in the most general sense. Now I think that it meant an alternative to the Rainbow Agenda. Maybe that could be made more explicit?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:9046:800:5C08:2872:D715:47C7 (talk) 05:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance? 

message: I cold find no evidence that Fred Savage was a staffer for the Review. Could someone link to a story he write, or even to a secondary source mentioning he was a writer? 152.17.57.133 (talk) 22:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry typo: could find no evidence 152.17.57.133 (talk) 22:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fred Savage
Talk:Bonalu

message: Hello 2406:B400:A9:9412:2993:8402:1DDD:6452 (talk) 13:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telugu
Talk:Bonda people

message: Hello there,
I've seen you had edited the Wikipedia article on Bonda people. This sentence is not referenced and I would like to know what leads to it : "It is not safe to go into their tribal areas."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonda_people
Thank you very much.
Rémi Tournebize (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Shogun (1986 board game)

message: Probably from 1970s or very early 1980s.  It was a checkers style game with a plastic board with red and white square plastic pieces.  The pieces displayed a number depending on where they moved, probably controlled by magnets.
Here's a photo of the game I remember:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jondresner/3502560230/
"SHOGUN. Exciting digital game by Epoch"
Squidfryerchef (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another, earlier board game called Shogun?
Talk:Bournvita Quiz Contest

message: One would expect this section to talk about the origins of the quiz show leading up to its release in 1972 and its profession till it turned into a TV show in the early 90s. 175.100.130.139 (talk) 04:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The history section is incomplete
Talk:Boyne (1877 ship)

message: There's a reference to a ship called Boyne in the Bengal obituary (http://books.google.com/books?id=T-HwSiLns14C&printsec=frontcover&dq=bengal+obituary). Apparently a George Sworder was midshipman on it, but he died in 1846, so presumably a different ship. Anyone know any more? Pidz (talk) 14:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boyne Ship 1846 
Talk:BPL Group

message: The company is known in India only as the BPL Group, and I doubt if the layman would even know the expansion of the name. In all publications, the name appears as BPL. Therefore, I am moving the page to BPL Group. -- Electronz (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move rationale 
Talk:Brahmananda Panda

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 
Talk:Brahmaputra-class frigate

message: with regard to this edit. The class of the destroer was changed by IP  and . I am not sure which one is correct, but wanted to inform you so that you can decide accordingly--DBigXray 06:19, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks DBigXRay; yes it was that exact change that showed me which other class article to look at; it's definitely not the Bramaputra class as the whole shape of the ship is different. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

text: *Thanks for checking it and informing. I am relaxed now :) --DBigXray 06:28, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delhi class destroyer 

message: Is the home port for the P-16 ships back to Mumbai? As the combat group set to receive Vikramaditya was composed of Western Fleet vessels. If it is then P-16A (Brahmaputra) class ships would be back with Eastern Fleet as well. Can someone confirm this change prior to editing the entry.Versova (talk) 14:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeport 
Talk:Braj

message: 'Coments'
shouldn't Vraja and Vraj redirect here? Syama (talk) 17:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you can do that. Maquahuitltalk! 08:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not agree to this suggessionRasoolpuri (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Agree 

message: Correct spelling of Braj are BrijRasoolpuri (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Braj comes from 'vraja' of Sanskrit. Even though 'brij' is quite commonly used too, 'braj' is more appropriate. Maquahuitltalk! 11:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct spelling 

message: "If Bhagwat Geeta can be summarized in one word as "Nishkaam Karmayoga", Braj can be summarized in one word as "Simplification of Divine"." At least we Americans won't understand that, because "Nishkaam Karmayoga" is two words not one word, and "Simplification of Divine" is three words. 2601:8:B500:862:DFD:5496:5C9:CA47 (talk) 06:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  One word
Talk:Braj Kumar Nehru

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition 

message: Am searching for an image of Braj Kumar Nehru to upload on this page. Can anyone guide me as to how can I search the wikipedia repository for his image (commons ??) -Ambar wiki (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Braj Kumar Nehru 

message: This article talks about a Shobha Nehru who died in 2001; should this not be distinguished from the Shobha Nehru who died in 2017 at the age of 108?Carltonio (talk) 16:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Shobha Nehru
Talk:Braja Kishore Tripathy

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 
Talk:Amaranth Advisors

message: I am about to add a section on how Amaranth influenced commodity prices and also led to the folding og MotherRock. Any suggestions? Nshuks7 (talk) 11:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[MotherRock]] 

message: It was an investment adviser to hedge funds.  There were a number of hedge funds that the firm advised.  
See, e.g., www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2007/34-55728.pdf 
"Amaranth Advisors L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company which 
has its headquarters and principal place of business in Greenwich, Connecticut, is an 
unregistered investment adviser to five hedge funds.  At all times, Amaranth has had full 
discretion to make investment decisions for the funds it advises."
HedgeFundBob (talk) 18:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amaranth Advisors LLC wasn't a "hedge fund." 
Talk:Britannia Industries

message: i  want digestive chocalte  biscuit  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.251.83.109 (talk) 14:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: 𝐴𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 49.126.15.3 (talk) 13:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  𝐸𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ
Talk:Daibyonin

message: does the title really parse as daibyo-nin (serious illness - person)?  i always took it as the sardonic dai-byonin (great - patient)...with a sense along the lines of "Mr. High-and-Mighty Invalid" in english.
i believe there's a subtle diff in stress between the two readings.  could a native speaker pls clarify which it is?  209.172.25.210 (talk) 22:23, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation
Talk:Buddhism in Kashmir

message: Is there any way to at least get stubs for the blank sections of this article?  Otherwise, let's remove them temporarily until they have content in them 67.131.148.171 21:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blank Sections 

message: the last sentence of the artile states that "The Kashmiri Pandits still worship the triratna symbol". where are the source for that? it would be very interresting to see. but else, the comment should probably be removed. --Guttormng (talk) 17:18, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  worship of triratna symbol 

message: There are both Buddhism in Kashmir as well as Jainism in Kashmir so I think it should be moved to another name featuring Jainism as well please give your views Rishabh.rsd (talk) 17:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of name 

message: Used information from this article for Jainism in Kashmir see this pages history for attributions Rishabh.rsd (talk) 09:56, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used information for [[Jainism in Kashmir]]
Talk:Buddhist eschatology

message: Theravada tradition places Siddhatta Gotama's death at about 544 BCE.  Plus 5000 years makes about the year 4456.
Bullhaddha (talk) 15:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  5000 years 

message: The Buddha did not predict his teachings would "disappear" after 500 years. In fact in the Diamond Sutra one of the Buddha's disciples was concerned whether in 500 years anyone would still remember and recite his teachings. and the Buddha responded that his teachings will always be remembered by someone and some good would always come from them. He did however say that the world would become more wicked —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.139.87.75 (talk) 01:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A prediction that his teachings would disappear? 

message: Why does this article link to the article on "Middle Ages"? The Middle Ages article discusses the medieval period in Europe which has nothing to do with Buddhism or the development of Buddhist eschatological theories. Perhaps this should be changed to "the 5th century," i.e., the time of Buddhaghosa?
Djbuddha 00:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle Ages? 

message: I feel this article would only be proper if it has the scriptual evidence of the prediction.  That is, in which sutta/sutra did Sakyamuni Buddha allegedly made this prediction?
203.53.30.10 (talk) 07:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the scriptual evidence? 

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=buddhist+eschatology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--124.78.209.178 (talk) 10:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI.... 

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+Orthodox+eschatology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--124.78.209.178 (talk) 10:57, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A red link is associated with the folowing... 

message: Why was this (seemingly useful) sentence deleted?
In it, Gautama Buddha predicted that his teachings of dharma would be forgotten after 5,000 years.
It seems pertinent in an article on Buddhist eschatology. MaynardClark (talk) 02:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Predicted forgetting
Talk:Bugyals

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Christopher George

message: * Marine Corps Service
** US Marine Corps Combat Correspondents Association Googleplex732 on 25 Dec 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.217.123.214 (talk) 23:05, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Looking for more information for the main article on Christopher George
Talk:Purgi language

message: I am changing the page title to Purgi language as it seems to be the most common name used by local people.J&K Tribal Writers Conference—2016, Sahitya Akademi, New Delhi, 2016. Ethnologue itself calls it "Purik" now (not Burig).http://www.ethnologue.com/18/language/prx/ -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: The purigi language is a old Tibetan langauge , and the sound of old tibetan is exactly matching with the purgi langauge than any other Tibetan langauge ,
So please update the image logo in tirbtan script as   " བོད་རིགས་སྐད " 
The Tibetan script is the original script for purig langauge . Minaro123 (talk) 20:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somebody add the title image logo in Tibetan script
Talk:Image analysis

message: Given that both pages are small, merger looks wise to me. The proposal to merge the more specific
- "Computer Image Analysis" - into the more general "Image Analysis" also seems right. I found no guidance in the 'Style Manual' or the 'Merge' page. If I wasn't looking in the right place, please tell me user:randy.f. "Computer" vs. "Digital" is a narrower issue. I slightly prefer "Digital" here because some of the less sophisticated IA tasks can be done with something less than a computer. "Learning" on the hand still requires something more than a computer.
These pages are both general and small. There are much more detailed specific pages on suptopics. The single merged IA page should provide an overview to these more specific pages. At the moment, someone who wants an overview would not get it here. They could try looking at the subtopic pages, but would probably be lost in the mountain of detail. Wikipedia should try to be an altas to the world of knowledge. A page is a chart. Charts can vary in detail and scope. And they can overlap.
--Randy.f 21:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge them and consider enriched merge guidelines.

message: I totally agree with Randy.f. This article is in urgent need for expansion. I'll do it myself when I get some time; I hope others do it as well. Also, there is a confusion in several Widipedia articles, where the editors equate processing with analysis; these are different things. I'll look for appropriate sources for editing this.Renato (talk) 18:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi guys, I added some descriptions and examples of different techniques in image analysis as well as different applications of image analysis, to get the article looking more complete :-) Shervinemami (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Urgent need for expansion

message: Aren't almost all these external links advertisement/spamm?Are they ok or do they violate a wikipedia policy?Renato (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam 

message: Kindly add the below as a reference* here "Techniques-->Medical Scan Analysis [*]"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20172792
Hidasri (talk) 08:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: - please state how this will improve the article.  DrStrauss talk 21:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Some proposed changes

message: Analyser 2C0F:F038:654:1800:0:0:0:3 (talk) 19:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analyser une image
Talk:Butkara Stupa

message: Does it make sense that this article would fail to mention the term Gandhara in the text of its current version?  This situation should be corrected immediately. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 17:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of mention of [[Gandhara]]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Fleshlight (fourth nomination)

message: We have a perfectly good undeletion policy that sends restored speedies that may yet be deletable to AfD.  In this case this was ignored in favor of an exceptionally bureaucratic three-part process: An AfD that got aborted, a deletion review that decided to abort the AfD, and reinstitute another AfD.  Doesn't this strike anyone else as a little unnecessary?  --Tony Sidaway 03:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really.  If anything, the upcoming result from this protracted situation caused by the original situation is likely to give any admin who wants to be unnecessarily quick on the trigger finger regarding alleged spam some pause.  Net benefit for all. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:56, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That doesn't make any sense. Standard operating procedure, to convert a bad speedy to an AfD, would take care of that much more efficiently and just as assuredly. Having a deletion review just wastes time needlessly. --Tony Sidaway 13:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you may want to talk to Danny in the future.  --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that's Tony's point. The point is, if a speedy is contested, then the article should be undeleted and sent to AfD. There's really no need for DRV.--Doc 23:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, there are some senses in which deletion review can be seen as an organised rump set up to obstruct the correct operation of the deletion policy, etc.  It's of marginal effectiveness so it's not a problem in the long run, but it does successfully delay actions, while simultaneously seeking to deny the opportunity actually to discuss the merits of a deletion (it's apparently about deciding whether other processes were followed correctly--which in Wikipedia terms is complete nonsense).  Sometimes it does act as an appeal against deletion, but this is rare.  We're far better off asking an administrator to undelete and send a disputed speedy to AfD; deletion review should never seek to obstruct this quite straightforwards execution of the undeletion policy. --Tony Sidaway 12:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And that was done, and not only was it denied, but it was also denied by two other admins I spoke with.  As I said before, you may want to talk to Danny in the future. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I'd have been fine with the AfD, if someone had actually closed the DRV first. AfD would perhaps have been a better option than DRV - but both at once is silly. I'm afraid I didn't read the policy (I never do), I just used common sense. You don't try the same case simmultaneously in two courts.--Doc 13:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

text: AfD decides whether an item should be deleted.  I've never really worked out what the deletion review people think they are doing--whatever it is, it seems to have only a tangential relationship with deciding whether or not an article should exist in the encyclopedia. --Tony Sidaway 17:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Buxi Jagabandhu Bidyadhar College

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 
Talk:Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute Of Management and Research

message: Amardeep Yadav
Webmaster
Web Promoters India
MBA
BVIMR Paschim Vihar, New Delhi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.134.229.72 (talk) 12:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: official site, including http://www.bvimr.com/Library.aspx and http://www.bvimr.com/IRC.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed