lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:UK singles chart

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Take My Breath Away (SuReal song). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 17#Take My Breath Away (SuReal song) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Take My Breath Away (SuReal song)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Freak Mode. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 26#Freak Mode until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ResPM (T🔈 🎵C) 12:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Freak Mode" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: No mention of these being introduced in 2017 Coachtripfan (talk) 10:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video streams 

message: It's pointed out above that we didn't get all the places where this might want fixing.  I find these with "Singles Chart", and would invite comments on whether some of them should stay capitalized:  Dicklyon (talk) 06:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: (, can you or a bot please notify these pages with an RM tag, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that I added just 5, with "UK Singles Chart", to this RM, with automatic notification by the bot.  The rest can be worked on later.  Still seeking input here about them. Dicklyon (talk) 10:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Relisting for a last chance to generate a clearer consensus. BD2412 T 17:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: More articles with "Singles Chart"
Talk:Pag (town)

message: The picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pag_Cathedral_with_Local_Lace_-_Pag_-_Croatia.jpg does not appear to be čipka.  The threads appears to be much too large as well as the lace appears to be wrinkled.  Čipka would not be wrinkled as it is quite stiff and is made from thread not yarn.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrdvt92 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Paška čipka

message: In the History section of this article, there is a sentence which reads:
:"After the rebellion against Zadar, Pag obtained partial autonomy, and Ludwig I acknowledged its full autonomy in 1376 as to all other Dalmatian towns."
Problem is, there appears to be more than one "Ludwig I," and I have not been able to determine which "Ludwig I" is the one referenced in this article.
Is it possibly Louis I of Hungary? (Louis is the French form of Ludwig) The time period seems right, as does the location, but I'm not 100% sure.
Can anyone with more expertise in this area clarify who this person is, and where the link is supposed to go?
Thanks, Kevyn 00:49, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is. (Silly king names and their endless permutations.) --Shallot 08:16, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Shallot, for clarifying that and fixing the link. Kevyn 23:35, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Ludwig I?
Talk:Breze

message: The Title is actually spelled wrong! Right: Brezel
----
The Wikisite Brezel exist
I also added the German Orthography at the end in the article !!!
--> see this Site :
Brezel
Brezen (singular brezel) are a common baked food in Germany, especially the southern part. It is related to the American pretzel, with which it shares its form and the salty taste. However unlike the hard and small pretzel, a breze is about 15cm wide, with a soft inside and a crunchy outside.
Brezen are eaten for breakfast and as a snack.
(In German: Brezel(singular), Brezeln(plural) used as Standard German and in Swabian Dialekt; Brezen used in Bavaria Dialekt.)
Hi there! Brezen don't have to be soft inside, there's also a widespread version that is big and hard, and is completely crispy. The soft one is usually referred to as "Laugenbreze" or "Bierbreze" (in Tyrol).
Greetings from Innsbruck ;) -- Mnolf 13:26, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone object to moving this to Brezel? That seems to be the most common name. Both Duden and Wahrig define the word under Brezel, with Duden giving der Brezen (pl. die Brezen) as an Austrian variant and Wahrig giving Bretzel as a Swiss variant. Neither of them gives any indication of the existence of a variant Breze. Also, German Wikipedia uses Brezel. Angr (talk • contribs) 21:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Duden online has Breze. 2003:F6:6F0D:F200:5457:9B91:59F7:DCDA (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change? 

message: I agree with the request for merger.  Pretzel is a large enough article that breze could be a subsection. JD79 23:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Medium format

message: Okay, I decided to be bold and make some major changes to this page. Initially, I intended to only change the formatting but added and deleted content. I'm a long time reader, 2nd time contributer, so I apologize in advance for any break in convention. If I did do something wrong, either with the content or with my editing, let me know so I wont do it again.  --Clngre 00:42, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Bold editing changes

message: Section on Lomography is confusing, first sentence seems like a run-on. rewrite suggested.
68.44.73.253 17:36, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lomography

message: Many of these brands have merged or gone under. Move for breaking into two sections: Current and Legacy companies
--Tom.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.176.4 (talk) 16:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common brands section needs filtering 

message: This article jumps about a bit between imperial and metric measures.  At some point it talks about an "8×10 sheet of paper".  8×10 what?  I'm guessing it's inches and maybe that's obvious to anyone who already knows the topic, but we shouldn't be assuming that much knowledge.  I don't have the time to fix this, but thought I'd just flag it here. ☸ Moilleadóir ☎ 11:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units of measure 

message: — Assignment last updated by Gallagm2 (talk) 00:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Stewardship Online

message: I added an image of a Hasselblad camera kit to the section on film types. -- Gallagm2 (talk) 01:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Louis the German

message: Added that he died in Germany. 24.31.169.252 (talk) 10:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of death

message: The article states "When his father, Louis I (called the pious), partitioned the empire toward the end of his reign in 843..."
Louis I the Pious died in 840. The empire was partitioned by the sons of Louis - Lothair I, Louis the German and Charles the Bald.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.5.68.46 (talk) 22:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partition of 843 

message: This article links to the "King of Bavaria" page, which refers to the Kings of Bavaria in the 1800's. This should probably be corrected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.54.115.185 (talk) 03:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected it to the list: List of monarchs of Bavaria. This list includes him and his timeframe. Momgamer09 (talk) 03:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link to King of Bavaria? 

message: 'Due to a decline in the written form in administration and government, Louis' reign predates Ottonian times."
I suggest removing this sentence because it makes no sense. Literacy aside, Louis's reign predates Ottonian times because they were in different centuries.
: Direct transl. from the German page, where it seems to mean that a decline in writing foreshadowed (the administrative style of)the Ottonian age/era/period. T 84.208.86.134 (talk) 22:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF? 

message: Two questions. For 1,600 years, someone else was burried in Lorsch. When did it change to Ludwig II? How do we know? 
Secondly, the caption of the photo for Lorsch states:
"Carolingian gatehouse (Torhalle) to Lorsch Abbey, where Louis the German was buried"
Where did this come from? Last I checked, the building is believed to have been profane, but no one knows what it was used for. 
Hopefully this can be clarified. Cheers. 79.106.203.32 (talk) 09:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial
Talk:Haunted (Poe album)

message: I find it awkward how this page and Poe (singer)'s page doesn't really shake each other's hand.  This page tells the tale of a second album that went sour since it was hitched to poor marketing venues.  Poe's page, though, seems to think the album was a critical success and showed strong sales, but Poe's career was undone by a rights complication in the AOL/Time Warner Merger.  That point of view is well documented on Poe (singer)'s page.  A lot of the information on this page is unsupported by citations, leading me to believe that the history section on this page is mostly conjecture by frustrated fans.
I like Poe, but I'm not a fan, fan.  And I'm sure someone else can do a better job editing this information that I could.  Anybody interested in fixing this page, and getting the word out that, no, the public didn't reject Poe - the industry did?
198.140.203.1 (talk) 08:29, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting Histories

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 17:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This album is connected

message: :Image:Poehaunted.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 01:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Poehaunted.jpg

message: Wondering if there's some connection between the songs. Шизомби (talk) 18:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dear Johnny" related to "Angry Johnny"?
Talk:Protectionism

message: I arrived from the Payne–Aldrich Tariff Act wikipedia page history tab which states protectionism is refuted by "progressives" but this page it says... "Protectionism is advocated mainly by parties that hold economic nationalist or left-wing positions"
This should be clarified or fixed as left- wing positions were more progressive & felt protectionism leads to monopoly. THANKS B1blazin (talk) 02:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory statement  

message: It looks like the bulk of this section was last updated sometime around 2009, apart from a quick couple sentences about the US abandoning the TPP in 2017.
There should be lots to add re: worldwide response to covid. We could at least add some info from G20 reports (EX: https://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/29th-Report-on-G20-Trade-and-Investment-Measures.pdf ), should only require a few paragraphs. I'll put it on my list to come back to this if nobody more experienced does :) Sssstuart (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Current World Trends" Updates 

message: This article needs to be updated for the 2020s, and I'll be working on it over the next few days. The lead of this article violates NPOV and is out of date, because it doesn't include accounts for historical examples of protectionism both working (i.e. the American System (economic plan)) and failing (i.e. Peronism in Argentina, as seen with the economic history of Argentina).
Two of the oldest right-wing political parties in the world that still exist, the Republican Party (United States) (began in the 1850s) and the Conservative Party (UK) (began in the 1830s) have historically supported protectionism, and the Republican Party currently supports protectionism. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating the article for the 2020s--i.e. [[right-wing populism]] and the [[2021–2023 global supply chain crisis]] 

message: How the government taken the initially wrong for of environment 2409:4066:C81:8E9D:0:0:D749:4410 (talk) 02:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental
Talk:Protected areas of Tasmania

message: Is anything really happening with this page?  The content hasn't been touched in a couple of years now, and all the links are *still* dead - is anyone ever going to write all these articles?  Some could be merged with town articles (that is, when the town articles are written - like Coles Bay and Seven Mile Beach) -- Chuq 01:53, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: older message

message: The recent POV RFA problem in the first paragraph is not written in encyclopediac style despite being referenced - needs either -re-writing in another article - or being re-written  as this is in effect a list not a platform...SatuSuro 11:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: newer message

message: Many of the redlinks in the list actually already have perfectly good articles about them.  They just need a little searching and piping to update them.  Maybe I can do some soon but, in the interim, there is some work to be done here. Maias (talk) 01:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unnecessary redlinks
Talk:Halfbreed Saiyan

message: Is there a better name than "halfbreed"? The word sounds, to my ears, very negative. It has a descriminatory tone... Maybe "Partial" Saiyan? The only reference I can find to the term in the text is used by Vegeta and it was used as an insult. Though, if there are real references with this name, I guess we'd have to live with it. JRP 02:01, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:The Brothers Johnson

message: The Brothers Johnson did not write the song "Tomorrow" for any Quincy Jones album. They wrote the song and performed it as an instrumental for their own album, the same one that featured the original "I'll Be Good to You" and "Get the Funk Out Ma Face." When Quincy Jones decided to record it, with Tevin Cambpell on lead vocal, he had Siedah Garrett write lyrics to the Johnsons' melody. Misterdoe 21:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tomorrow" 

message: Can anyone instruct me on how to change the name of this page from "Brothers Johnson" to "The Brothers Johnson". The name of the band was "The Brothers Johnson" and should reflect this. BBODO 17:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been done.--EchetusXe (talk) 00:33, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Name Change 

message: I think the article is looking pretty decent now. I think if anyone is willing to put the work in then it needs citations to improve it, also a fleshing out of their style and their members (the former members are just listed in the infobox, thats it).
AC/DC is a good article about a band so draw inspiration from that.--EchetusXe (talk) 00:42, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve article 
Talk:Yellow socialism

message: I just changed this text:
The "Berne International" (or "Two-and-a-half International") which met at Zimmerwald in 1915 was similarly described by Lenin as "yellow socialist", despite its opposition to the war, for its rejection of revolutionary socialism.
to
The "Berne International" (or "Two-and-a-half International"), formed in Vienna in 1921, was similarly described by Lenin as "yellow socialist", despite its opposition to the war, for its rejection of revolutionary socialism.
BUT, then I realised that the Berne International is the re-formed Second International, formed in Berne in 1919 by the pro-war socialists. Which one did Lenin call "yellow"? BobFromBrockley 11:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I found Lenin calling the Berne Intl yellow, will add that in. Still need more clarification. BobFromBrockley 11:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berne International 

message: So -
Capitalized "Yellow" through out the article - "Yellow" was intended as a "proper noun"-based adjective, like "Christian", or, obviously, "Red".
The 1904 date is wrong per the article on Bietry - corrected to 1902.
Reorganized the references to Marxist use of the label.
Added some history from Bietry article.
Broke out the summary of the ideas to a section.
Rephrasing of some very clumsy sentences.
Rich Rostrom (Talk) 02:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I was writing up my change descrip when the page posted somehow. 

message: Ok so I don't speak french, and you have a link in your external links of Pierre's book, Le Socialisme et les Jaunes, but it's in French. Is there a translation in English that anyone knows of?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:201:200:7AE0:8868:9440:4B69:C910 (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Le Socialisme et les Jaunes (English Translation)
Talk:Cybele

message: I'll refrain from further editing on the article for the foreseeable future, but I do want to point out that a number of citation formats are being used on the page. Standardizing is best per WP:CITEVAR, and it makes it possible for other editors to edit/add material without furthering the mess.
I saw citation templates in use on the page and started standardizing some of the references to that format. (I don't have a strong preference for them; I had not encountered them until I saw them in use in this article. I came to the article out of curiosity, and as I read, I liked the way the cite templates were offering the full cite information while the in-text citations remained concise.) I didn't realize how contentious they were, as  pointed out on my talk page. I'm just pointing out that a consensus would help improve the page. Popoki35 (talk) 12:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the changes that you have made. I think that the sfn/harvnb tags are an improvement, since they were already present on the page, they make the references shorter, and are machine-readable. I'm not terribly convinced that they are any harder to use than any other wiki-syntax (I actually find it much easier to read a text with sfn/harvnb tags than one with ref tags) and they are now very wide-spread across the wiki. Furius (talk) 23:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References are inconsistent 

message: :
Please explain why it is controversial here. Viriditas (talk) 10:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Controversial means the "meaning and morality", in this cases, is not agreed upon. Example: scholar A thinks it means x, scholar B thinks it means y. Controversial is a neutral adjective here. 27.55.89.161 (talk) 10:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is it controversial?
Talk:Information system (2nd version)

message: Yes Please merge it. Main article should be about information systems with a paragraph about the field of study information systems. 29 August 2006
:Well I think both websites are useful but they should be in the same site. Artemisia 16:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, both are useful. Just merge the text and references appropriately to the same location. Abc378 15:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I object. Putting Information System in the Information Systems is like putting the brain in the Neurobiology article... This article is substantial enough to stand alone, although it does require a lot of attention. Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge it 

message: An information system (IS) is an arrangement of information technology aimed at solving problems, leveraging opportunities or addressing directives.  The discipline that deals with information systems, academically and professionally, is called information systems.  The two entries should not be merged any more than "Accounting" and "general ledger account" or "Marketing" and "consumer products market" would be merged.
As for the mathematical set theory references, maybe there needs to be a disambiguation page? Most readers looking up "information system" are expecting to see a description of what organizations use on a daily basis.  The set theory allusion? Not so much, I think.
The security stuff simply does not belong here.  What a single author uses to define an IS in an the context of security might belong on an IS security page, but not here.  When I get time I'll come back and make some of these changes, unless someone comes up with some good reasons not to do so. Tee Owe 14:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This whole page needs a do-over 

message: This article was merged to information systems on 30 June 2007 and then split off again on 21 October 2009, when information systems was renamed information systems discipline. We now have the ridiculous situation where two articles start with the same sentence, a sentence which does not define either topic. Nurg (talk) 06:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge history

message: Hey, people. I am currently studying IT and in my IS class, we're taught that IS has five components, namely : Hardware, Software, People, Communication, and Procedures and Protocol. If I can summarize the information from my text-book, would I be allowed to post it here?
Also, can somebody give me the format of a book citation for Wikipedia? Like, in which order do I put the particulars? (Author, version, book name, ISBN etc). Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk) 18:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Components of an IS 

message: Hi, the components currently in the article are totally wrong. Aleksander Bulovic, please insert what you wrote above. Stereo bum (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Components
Talk:Red Bank, New Jersey

message: There's a lot of unsubstantiated, subjective comments that have been inserted in the article (Red Bank's status as a nightlife "hot spot" or an artistic "mecca" are two examples). I've tried to prune these references. They take away from the quality of information previously provided regarding demographics, politics, etc. If someone wants to put in substantiated, objective comments about these subjects, though, I would applaud that.--TPB 17:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  11 28 06 Revision 

message: Someone who knows more should clean it up.  If it is factually untrue about the people and location, then it should be corrected or editted away.  I don't know so I just changed the wording.  Someone who does know, please help us. Chivista 15:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nearby celebs section 

message: Doesn't NJ Route 35 travel through Red ank after it crosses from Middletown?
--24.228.70.72 23:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route 35 in Red Bank? 

message: Red Bank 
--24.228.70.72 01:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  correction 

message: Lists of names in this article should be sourced in accordance with WP:BLP. As there is no way of constantly maintaining linked articles, this applies to names which have a Wikipedia article as well as those that do not. Any name listed with no verifiable citations should be removed. Refer to WP:NLIST for guidance. Fæ (talk) 10:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of names

message: This entry has the longest list of not very notable people I can remember seeing. About 20 percent are worthy of listing. Nicmart (talk) 16:16, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not very notable people