lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alfvén wave

message: Can someone confirm whether \mu_0 is supposed to be the permeability (as opposed to permeativity) of free space?  Or can someone provide a definition for permeability of a plasma?
That is correct.
  
Answer: There's no such thing as "permeativity".  There is permittivity, usually given the symbol ε0.  Permeability is correct in this context. 11/12/2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.237.248 (talk) 17:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  <math>\mu_0</math> 

message: Since the constant coefficient in the second expression is approximately seven times the speed of light, many readers will surely wonder how this propagation speed avoids violating Einstein's speed limit.  Would someone who knows this field be so kind as to insert a brief mention? Peter (talk) 16:11, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  speed 

message: Alfvén velocity is v_A \approx (2.18\times10^{11}\,\mbox{cm/s})\,(m_i/m_p)^{-1/2}\,(n_i/{\rm cm}^{-3})^{-1/2}\,(B/{\rm gauss}) \approx (2.18\times10^{6}\,\mbox{km/s}), faster than speed of light? Newone (talk) 09:58, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that formula is valid in the non-relativistic limit. The relativistic formula is in the "Relativistic case" section. ― ___A._di_M. (formerly Army1987) 19:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfvén velocity 

message: The section on the heating of the corona appears to have information that is more understandable than the technical information contained in the definition and math sections.  Unfortunately, I do not have enough understanding of the physics topic of this article to be able to properly condense it into a more easily digestible format.
If someone with an understanding of Alfvén waves could take the basic info on the waves from the third paragraph of the corona section and combine it with a less technical definition then I think that would make for a better intro to the article.
Epolk (talk) 03:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. 

message: *https://phys.org/news/2018-03-scientists-year-old-mystery-magnetic-sun.html
--Kmhkmh (talk) 14:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: currently in the science news 

message: Is the Alfvén wave#Historical timeline appropriate here? I think prose would be better for this info (see MOS:TIMELINE), but would like to see what others think before converting it. CoronalMassAffection (talk) 15:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical timeline
Talk:Leviathan (1989 film)

message: Could "Deep Rising" be another movie with a similar theme? I never saw it so I can;t comment on it.24.83.178.11 10:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have removed the plot tag again. In addition to the
*Infobox
*Lede section
*Plot section
*Cast section
*Soundtrack section
*Reception section
*References section
*External links section
*Navigation box
I have added
*Production section
*Release section
*Home media section
*Critical response section
*Audience response section
Therefore, I no longer believe that the article "consists almost entirely of a plot summary". Accordingly, I have removed the  tag. Cheers. 64.40.54.177 (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure if "Matt Roehler" added his "audience opinion" himself, but he's not a noteworthy person. One YouTube user's video (with a whopping 800 views) does not warrant its own section. Audience Response section removed 86.3.217.7 (talk) 22:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed plot tag
Category talk:Vampires in film

message: Can we split this into 2 categories? One for films and one for tv shows? Bosco (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We have :Category:Vampires in television for that. I am also splitting off :Category:Vampires in animated television and :Category:Vampires in animated film. Furthermore, we have a lot of duplication in regard to subcategories. If we have a subcategory here, we don't need articles in that subcategory to be duplicated here. For example, I removed the Twilight films because they are all in :Category:The Twilight Saga (film series) which is a subcategory. The biggest endeavour, which might help cut this down to a single page, is if we remove all the :Category:Dracula films content, which is also a subcategory. Ranze (talk) 13:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?
Talk:List of high schools in Michigan

message: For clarity, this should be reworked so that multi-HS Districts are consolidated and sublisted ... --Jon Cates 18:48, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I sublisted the largest school districts as suggested, and it definitely makes for easier navigation. Thoughts anyone? Aeh4543 01:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone has a bot that could handle the task of wikilinking the appropriate schools, that would be grand. Gtwfan52 (talk) 19:29, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Navigation issue
Talk:List of comedy horror films

message: There are quite a few movies on this list that are not horror comedies, I would consider revising
Also, now that I think of it, there should be seperat sections for "black comedies" and "spoofs"
*I've noticed some of the films on here that are black comedies or spoofs but not necesarily comedy/horror are put here only because there was no comedy-horror films being released that year. We don't need films of this genre for every single year. Comedy/horror hybrids weren't being produced that often for quite a while. (68.153.175.5 18:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suggest a discussion for films that people believe are not horror comedies or should be considered added to the list of horror comedies (AKA thrillomedies as Arachnophobia's marketing called them).  I almost added the 1986 film Troll to the list, because I remember laughing a lot during it, but I don't know if it is a comedy.Antmusic 20:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but what are the criteria? I remember watching the laughable Carnosaur, and not laughing while wondering why anyone would laugh at this, even if they were supposed to be laughing at its crapiness. Comedy horror - who cares? Just make it horror. The laughs will follow.--Shtove 01:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe the criteria would be that we only put in the self proclaimed Horror Comedies.... but even then something could be marketed as a horror comedy that is no funny at all (Terror Toons, in my opinion, fits this bill). Yes, it is true that everyone has their opinions on movies (like I HATE Terror Toons, and it is not funny at all, in my opinion... funny concept, unfunny movie with horrible execution... Read the comments on IMDB to see other's opinions on this film). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Antmusic (talk • contribs) 21:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I suggest a discussion  

message: A bucket of blood and Blood Feast 2: All U Can Eat. (User:tivaelydoc 12:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey You're Missing a Couple

message: What do you think?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.189.43.216 (talk) 02:16, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snakes on a Plane? 

message: Many of the films on this list are not horror-comedies.  There is a difference between Horror-Comedy (Evil Dead II, Cabin in the Woods being examples) and straight-out parody (Scary Movie, etc).  So many films do not belong on this list, it's not even funny.  MaximumMadnessStixon (talk) 00:52, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very inaccurate list...
Talk:The Man They Could Not Hang

message: === Production notes ===
The fictional heart-and-lung-machine prop presented an idea that was strictly science fiction at the time, but later the central idea became reality as "open-heart surgery." Later renamed "on-pump" surgery owing to the development of microsurgery that does not require stopping the heart, "on pump" requires heart stoppage, then hook-up to the pump, then operating on the repairs, and then reconnecting and reviving the patient, exactly the basic theory presented by the film.
-----
Section moved by — MY, OH, MY! 00:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statement that I removed from the page/Would need a source or cannot go back 

message: The fictional heart-and-lung-machine prop presented an idea that was strictly science fiction at the time, but later the central idea became reality as "open-heart surgery." Later renamed "on-pump" surgery owing to the development of microsurgery that does not require stopping the heart, "on pump" requires heart stoppage, then hook-up to the pump, then operating on the repairs, and then reconnecting and reviving the patient, exactly the basic theory presented by the film.
-----
Section moved by — MY, OH, MY! 00:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production notes
Talk:Martin (1977 film)

message: At over 1000 words, the plot summary had been tagged as overlong for nearly six months. I've trimmed it using a version from an older revision  which I believe is not only much briefer but much better written, much more what a Wikipedia plot summary should be. --Tony Sidaway 01:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: I own that too and it's a nice release, but after all it's just one of many. The film has been released on home video/dvd a few dozen times all around the world. The only notable fact about the Arrow release is that it contains the original version as well as the Italian version. Everything else seems more like an advertisement by some officious Arrow-Fanboy (yes, those people can be... ehm... 'pushy'). --79.244.58.127 (talk) 03:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrow Release 

message: Is this film from 1977 or 1978? The page is currently contradictory. The infobox gives a release date of May 10, 1977. The release section says it's May 10, 1978. It also mentions it was screened at the Cannes market in 1977 (the provided source is a dead link). IMDb mentions multiple screening at festivals in 1977, including Cannes on May 18, 1977. Then Edinburgh (August 27, 1977), Austin (October 27, 1977), and London (November 26, 1977). I doubt all these dates are made up. Bottom line is, it seems to be a 1977 film, so we should find a reliable source confirming it and then move the page to "Martin (1977 film)". Kumagoro-42 (talk) 23:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Elektrozavodskaya (Arbatsko-Pokrovskaya line)

message: Not a bad article, but it looks to me that it would benefit from a little re-formatting and proof reading, which I'm happy to do.
EvocativeIntrigue 18:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's Gelfreich (Гельфрейх). --M5 (talk) 07:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:The Masque of the Red Death (1964 film)

message: As the film is "noted for its opulent colour scheme", why is this illustrated by a photo in black and white?  Is this in fact a screenshot at all?  Jheald 12:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a colour movie?! That would have totally shocked me when I will see it, I have been expecting old school black & white film from the sixties. I suppose it is because in those days press material was most often released in black and white. ¨¨ victor falk 01:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot ? 

message: "The screenplay by Charles Beaumont and R. Wright Campbell was based upon an 1842 short story of the same name by American author Edgar Allan Poe."
:It contained also elements of other Poe stories, especially that of "Hop-Frog".--80.141.185.103 (talk) 15:38, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hop-Frog 

message: What is the point of mentioning that it has been broadcast on American TV? It isn’t felt necessary to mention that it has been shown in American cinemas, so why TV? It’s been shown on TV elsewhere too, so it isn’t exactly remarkable. If it had been banned, or with-held from TV in that market, only to be shown after many years, well that might be worth a note, but there is nothing here to suggest that that was the case… It makes it sound like America has done something unusual in broadcasting it, and likewise the mention of a DVD release makes it sound like that has only happened in the US. Jock123 (talk) 07:57, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded and (finally) acting upon. Lee M (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Broadcast on American Television” 

message: The plot description is too long and there should be info on box office and critical reception. Lee M (talk) 03:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbalanced 

message: I see there is a link to the "White Death" (Tuberculosis) and the "Black Death" (Bubonic Plague).  Should not the "Blue Death" link to Influenza (as it is referred to here: http://www.jhsph.edu/news/magazine/archive/Mag_Fall04/prologues/index.html)?
50.120.90.227 (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to the above, does anybody know who voices the other Deaths? I'm pretty certain that Bernard Lee was one of them. ("From Cathay and beyond...") Lee M (talk) 00:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Deaths" In the Final Scene
Talk:The Columbus Dispatch

message: Wish I had some real data to back it up, but the Columbus Dispatch is known for its awful treatment of carriers (the people who deliver the paper), who are historically underpaid. Under law, they're independent contractors, and they're paid to do a job regardless of the amount of work or time spent on it. This work includes collating (putting the papers together), delivering, and contacting the customers for payment. The contacting of customers is outside the daily delivery, and a very large job, since it includes preparing many bills. The Columbus Dispatch offers little recourse to carriers who aren't paid by customers, and the carriers have to pay what the customers don't pay. In other words, unless the carriers recieve 100% of payments, they have to pay the difference. This isn't the days of paper boys, but rather largely underpaid mostly adult workers.
I'm adding a short mention of these criticisms, but since I don't have true data beyond personal experience (and the experiences of family members) I'll leave it short. Hopefully it could be expanded in the future. --128.146.68.89 18:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms
Talk:Memento Mori (film)

message: A synopsis would be excellent. --70.53.99.166 01:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we get a disambiguation link to the new Flyleaf album, also titled Momento Mori?  I'd do it, but I don't know how. 173.48.130.66 (talk) 18:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation Link
Talk:Monster Mash (1995 film)

message: ...of The Rocky Horror Picture Show, of course. Of course nobody cares but the young couple with car trouble who are forced to spend the night at a spooky mansion, and are forced to endure music while countering the sinister plots of monster movie characters, seems familiar... Rocky Horror is itself a parody of the original musical, I suppose. The critic who said, "there aren’t many other films like this" was surely joking. Should there be a link to "Rocky Horror," at least? Wastrel Way (talk) 02:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake, parody, or imitation?
Talk:The Monster Squad

message: http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=23100
There is a letter write in campaign to release Monster Squad on DVD
Hand written letters stating, "WE WANT MONSTER SQUAD on DVD now!" are supposed to be sent to:
Mr. Sumner M. Redstone
Viacom
1515 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
Antmusic 00:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that this one has been announced, fans need to find out who owns Night of the Creeps and do the same thing.  LOL Antmusic 22:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  According to Ain't it cool News 

message: HorrorHound #6 has interviews with the cast and Fred Dekker & DVD Specs. Including: commentary, 13 minutes of deleted scenes (if it can be found) & behind the scenes photos, etc. Antmusic 22:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HorrorHound #6 has interviews & DVD Specs 

message: How can we find out how well the DVD Special Edition is selling?  There are no copies left at my local Best Buy, Target, Fred Meyer, and Circuit City.  Each place claimed to have had at least 4-10 copies and they sold within an hour of openeing.  I am kind of shocked. I still need to find my copy! Thank goodness for the Internet, but now I will have to wait to get my copy.  Antmusic 23:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability 

message: Not to offend whoever wrote the summary for this page, but it could use a little tuning-up in terms of grammar,etc.  This might be a major edit, so I don't want to go into anything without some feedback from other editors.  It doesn't look like this page has been edited in a while, but just wanted to throw this idea out there before stepping on any toes. Chrisball96 (talk) 18:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it has not been edited in a while. Go for it! Let me know if you have any questions. Erik (talk | contribs) 19:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Erik thanks! Will get on it soon and might have some questions for you! Chrisball96 (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible re-write 

message: The plot summary states the film takes place in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, yet this is un-cited, and I have seen the film enough times - closer to 200 than to 100 - to know with absolute certainty the film does not state where it takes place. In fact, it seems to go out of its way NOT to pin down any geographical location.
If no one objects, I will be removing the reference to Baton Rouge.203.221.17.186 (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if someone wants to add it back, they can locate a source for it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:51, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baton Rouge 

message: I ran the refill tool and it replaced the only bare url that it found. Can we remove the "bare urls" warning template at the top of the page now? Rkhwaja (talk) 18:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I remove the "bare urls" template?
Talk:Mortuary (2005 film)

message: Some obvious Cthulhu Mythos references here. Maybe they deserve a mention on this page? I'd do it myself, but I'm in the middle of exams. --Sir Ophiuchus 19:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Is there some source for this, a search on IMDB turns up nothing.
It is hard to imagine this dreadful flick inspiring a sequel - although the title itself might be recycled.  Among the many defects of this film is apparent indecision whether Denise Crosby was playing a serious or a comic role -- she bungles a simple embalming in Three Stooges fashion.  Also obvious - really obvious - errors about funeral practice, especially for an audience which had already made Six Feet Under a successful cable series;  rigor mortis in a corpse that's been dead more than a day and showing the signs of an autopsy to boot,  using expensive coffins to store untreated corpses, etc.  173.79.234.183 (talk) 15:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel? 

message: "After the loss of their father, the Doyle family – Leslie, Jonathan, and Jamie – move to the Fowler Mortuary in hope of starting a new life..."
Um... they just arbitrarily decide to move in to a mortuary?
"Sheriff Howell investigates the crypts, where Bobby Fowler infects him"
With what?  Herpes?  The Andromeda Strain?  A head cold?
Pretty ragged.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 00:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot description needs work
Talk:The Mike Malloy Show

message: Should we move "Trademark catch-phrases" and "nicknames" from Mike Malloy to this page? The information would probably be more appropriate under the show information page rather than the bio page. Thoughts? Pumpkin Pi 19:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Since there's little information yet on Malloy's termination at AAR, marked this as a current event. More than likely there will need to be additional edits as details become available about the events of 30 Aug 2006. RoboNerd 11:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, good thinking. Today's edit to the original message on mike's site, implies that possibly news sources will pick this story up. We should keep our eyes open for details. Pumpkin Pi 02:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Current Event title back due to Nova M Radio deal today. Pumpkin Pi 03:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Event Toggle

message: I support a merge. What do the rest of you think? Piercetp 04:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am fine either way. Debivort 04:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that while this article overlaps with Mike Malloy quite a bit, it also contains new and fairly helpful information such as the affiliate table. If these items are acceptable in a biography article, a merge would probably be a good idea, but otherwise I think the articles should stay separate. Could you clarify the rules for a Wikipedia biography? Pumpkin Pi 19:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After 7 months, there's no further action on the merge proposal. There appears to be no consensus to merge, and nobody actively pursuing it. If someone wants to reopen the discussion, fine. But I'm removing the merge proposal banner for now. Ipoellet (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To merge or not to Merge 

message: The Affiliates table implies that show is "broadcast" live, but some of the stations are off-the-air at the times shown.  Shouldn't the table reflect the truth? i.e., that the show is not broadcast on the radio frequency shown, but rather, it's only "Internet-broadcast" at those times.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.102.38.38 (talk) 17:36, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliates 

message: This article needs to be updated, e.g.,  Malloy isn't on WCPT anymore.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.127.171 (talk) 16:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Material 

message: Malloy has been banished from SiriusXM live. He is now on tape delay from midnight-3 am ET. DavidSteinle (talk) 18:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Way, way, way out of date 

message: I added a new sub-heading under show features to reflect his general program that he now has on Wednesday nights.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.41.48 (talk) 21:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church Night
Talk:Nekromantik

message: The article mentions a band called Nekromantix, but not one with the actual identical name to the film: Nekromantik. UK Goth band active circa 2000. 2A00:23C5:FE56:6C01:D93A:1815:996:1879 (talk) 19:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The musical band Nekromantik
Talk:Night of Dark Shadows

message: This article says "The story was very loosely based on the "parallel-time" sequence of the TV series." However, there's nothing about this movie that is similar to the parallel-time storyline. Where does that claim come from?
::I was just coming here to say exactly the same thing. It's simply untrue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.149.12 (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parallel Time 

message: Not sure whether the release of Night of Dark Shadows (and its predecessor, House of Dark Shadows) actually took place in October 2012, but I know for certain they were in fact released, as I own both of them. Blozier2006 (talk) 10:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD release
Talk:16/9 (album)

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 