lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Miskatonic River

message: The carbonated beverage called "soda" or "pop" in much of the US is sometimes called "tonic" in eastern Massachusetts. A local company, Miscoe Spring Beverage Co, Inc.,
89 Northbridge Road,
Mendon, MA 01756,
is or was a maker of carbonated beverages, which was sometimes called "Miscoe Tonic." Mendon is not far from Providence. The obvious connection seems to be uncodumented. Snezzy (talk) 02:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's surely based on the Mystic river. DancesWithGrues (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another possible origin of the name
Talk:Willis Conover

message: Shouldn't there also be notation of his book about his teenaged correspondence with Lovecraft and the book he wrote about it? Listed on the lovecraft page but not here, has excerpts on the Necronomicon page as well.
204.210.240.134 (talk) 01:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The University of North Texas has made its  available online. Archived broadcasts include music and interviews.  More information . -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 02:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online resource
Talk:Hot Doug's

message: I decided to create this page after I saw someone had made an empty wikilink to Hot Doug's on Charlie Trotter's page regarding the foie gras debate. I'm checking to see when that ref was put in. Jjacobsmeyer 08:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page

message: Also, I should be able to make it to Hot Doug's by the end of the week to get some photos - some of the crowd, as well as some of the awards on the wall. Jjacobsmeyer 21:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: Accoring to Anthony Bourdain on Anthony Bourdain: No Reservations, the duck fat fries are the king of fries. (ref: The episode the features Chicago and Hot Doug's) 76.66.203.102 (talk) 04:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Best fries?
Talk:Bitter Creek (Wyoming)

message: I thought I had a ref listed here. Did you have any for your material besides the main article, which is pretty heavily referenced so it shouldn't matter. IvoShandor 09:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah, forgot, geographical ref I used. : ) IvoShandor 09:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point - if you have any references for the relative positions of the coal camp and Chinatown, then we should use them.  I used your description in the main article, and verified the relative positions on the map.  I tried to find some better sources for the course of the river, other then the usual geographical maps.  This  discusses Bitter Creek following the interstate into Green River, thats probably pretty good.  Next time I happen to be driving near there, I'll snap some pictures of the creek itself - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 15:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs
Talk:Churching of women

message: I vaguely remember having a cutting from the Hull Daily Mail, a local paper, which mentioned that a mother refused to see her daughter because she had not been churched. A local vicar was condemning the practice.
Graeme Stickings
--62.25.106.209 09:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Can someone add infos on other parts of the West?
At the moment the section is mainly about England with a short mention about Ireland.
I never heard of ceremony myself, so I can't add anything. --Dia^ (talk) 21:30, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the section on the ceremony in the West is pretty Anglocentric and should be broadened.  The ceremony is included in my Extraordinary Form Roman Missal published by Baronius Press.  I would assume it is also included in the missal published by Angelus Press.  When I have a chance, I will have to look through the ceremony again and add to the article here.  --Sephiroth9611 (talk) 23:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: In the West or in UK + Ireland?
Talk:Earth Quack

message: Can you please any one tell me what is the place that has highest gravitational force on the earth?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susanpus (talk • contribs) 08:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is the place that has highest gravitational force inthe earth? 

message: The plot description is too long and detailed.  RJFJR (talk) 02:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:New Life Christian Fellowship

message: I have renamed the article from New Life Christian Fellowship to New Life Campus Fellowship.  There are a handful of New Life Christian Fellowship churches across the country.  I am not 100% positive, but I don't think they are related to each other - I believe they are all independent.  At any rate, the church at Tech is "Campus" Fellowship.  See  and , among other places. --B 03:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: Far too much of this article pertains to the massacre.  NLCF existed before the massacre and is only related to the massacre inasmuch as everyone at Virginia Tech is related to the massacre. --B 03:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Virginia Tech massacre]]
Talk:ZTreeWin

message: Recently a proposed deletion notice was added with reason "No evidence of notability. No references given." That notice has been removed. I would like this article kept, but it must be fixed. There must be evidence of notability, and there must be some references (articles by reliable sources that have discussed ZTreeWin in a significant manner, not just a in-passing mention. Johnuniq (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Orel

message: I was looking for info on the pitcher Orel Hershiser, didn't know how to spell his surname, and so searched for "orel".  No mention on disambig, so I added it, because I figured others might do the same.  Later, I noticed from the edit history that Hershiser was previously added and removed from this disambiguation page.  Ezhiki commented in his removal, "we generally do not disambiguate by first names"... I respect the convention, but I think a notable but unusual name is a worthy exception. — Demong talk 09:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orel Hershiser 

message: This was a vessel engaged to the Russian American Company involved in the Dryad Incident recounted on the Fort Stikine article.  Although the Orel is not mentioned in this article its companion vessel the Chichagof (brig) IS.  In the absence of other cites, though I know it's out there that the Orel was a similar vessel, I've dabbed it as "brig", it may be that Russian brig Orel is the proper title, given the other ships mentioned here? The other source I know if calls it the Oryol but that redirects here anyway. The other mention I think is here or here.Skookum1 (talk) 02:35, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Orel (brig)]]
Talk:Blower

message: I've removed the prose from this page, as it shouldn't be on a disambiguation page.  Perhaps it could be merged into relevant articles if the information isn't already contained there.
a supercharger for a car providing more power [horse power](hp) for   carbureted engine's. Is an air compressor used to force more air (and hence more oxygen) into the combustion chamber(s) of an internal combustion engine than can be achieved at ambient atmospheric pressure.
The additional mass of oxygen-containing air that is forced into the engine improves on its volumetric efficiency which allows it to burn more fuel in a given cycle - which in turn makes it produce more power. A supercharger can be powered mechanically by belt, gear, or chain-drive from the engine's crankshaft. It can also be driven by a gas turbine powered by the exhaust gases from the engine. Turbine-driven superchargers are correctly referred to as turbo-superchargers - or more commonly as turbochargers.
Greg 09:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Under what conditions and the following statement be removed from centrifugal compressor? "Cleanup|date=June 2008"
centrifugal compressor is currently in a semi-complete state. It has not been proofread and has not been verified to standard that I would like to apply. I would like to ask for everyone's help to please review the article and make comments on the discussion page. I really will attempt to incorporate all of your improvements in a rigorous and consistent fashion. it is important that you are happy the way your issues are addressed.
It is currently missing a section on "design methodology" that I would like to research and discuss before I complete. There are significantly different points of view that I would like to try to unify. the section on design methodology is not original work and will be properly referenced.
All turbomachinery is unified by fundamental physics in the applied mathematics use in their design and analysis. That is why the term turbomachinery can be used as an umbrella topic.
Dozens of academic textbooks attest to the above statement.
Other than one other turbomachinery entry I have not been happy with the technical and scientific accuracy of any other encyclopedic entries. Most of these entries have been negatively impact by end-user and application colloquialisms. I will slowly, starting with centrifugal pumps and centrifugal fans try to correct various errors in statements. Unless I am asked I will not make any significant changes to the outlines of these encyclopedic articles.
thank you for everyone's help martin koronowski, Mkoronowski (talk) 22:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  in need of advice and help!
Talk:Air Scotland

message: I cannot understand why the link of Air-Scoltand doen't operate properly. If anyone knows can please inform the rest of us in order to know if we must hope for a cheap ticket from air scotland62.56.87.100 09:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tactical Ops: Assault on Terror

message: I know this has pretty much nothing to do with wikipedia, but the link to the website is broken. The website doesn't work. :( ****  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.155.102.62 (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: eh... yes it does :/ -- Sander 12:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Website

message: In the Infobox, the "Platform(s)" field includes "PC".  I think that the "Platform(s)" field should specify a value or values from the " Supported platforms" section of the  Vgclegend template.  For example, if Tactical Ops: Assault on Terror only runs on MS-DOS, then Tactical Ops: Assault on Terror's Infobox should specify "DOS" in the "Platform(s)" field.
ProResearcher (talk) 03:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Frogwares

message: Thier logo is remarkably similar to Bullfrog Productions, parhaps this should be mentioned. 77.103.120.40 (talk) 15:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That they both have frogs? Hardly notable and bears no tangible relation. Original research of any kind will not be tolerated on Wikipedia. ···巌流? · talk to ganryuu  06:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 
Talk:Combativity award in the Tour de France

message: How is this awarded? Is there a jury who decides or is there a more mathematical system? 81.76.120.42 15:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. A jury of eight "cycling specialists" determines the winner. I put it in the article. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 09:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It  would be nice to know what kind of criteria the judges use. From someone who knows nothing about cycling and trying to get some info this article was not very useful. I still have no idea what the award is really for. Lonjers (talk) 10:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've seen that it's also awarded for individual stages. Although not every stage - stages when no rider was impressive enough. What I want to know, and I think it should be put in the article is, if the person who wins most combativity awards for stages automatically gets the award ?? 213.149.61.3 (talk) 16:35, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria
Talk:Iliopsoas

message: Wikipedia says that the psoas minor is attachad to the transverse processe of the vertebrae, but both the Gray's anatomy (40th edition, expert consult, page 1368) and the Netter's Atlas (5th edition, student version, plate 484) say that the psoas minor is attached of the sides of the bodies, not the transverse process. 
Should I fix that or there is an explanation?
--93.40.75.9 (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attachment of the Psoas Minor

message: Following sentence should be rewritten =
"Strongest of the hip flexors (rectus femoris, sartorius, and tensor fasciae latae), iliopsoas is important for standing, walking, and running." The hip flexors according to this sentence are the muscles within round brackets "(rectus femoris, sartorius, and tensor fasciae latae)". This does not include the iliopsoas but the same sentence states that iliopsoas is a hip flexor. /Björn Ahlman
It would be useful if someone who knows how to write "prononciation symbols" (I forgot what the symbols are called) could help pronounce "iliopsoas"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hackbook (talk • contribs) 02:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revise sentence
Talk:Psoas major muscle

message: Strengthening the psoas is also tricky, but typically involves [...] knee raises on a levered machine 
Levered machine = Power tower (exercise)? --Abdull (talk) 12:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section below contained some interesting stuff but cite no sources and, as templates did point out, need some work. I drop this here hoping someone will bring the references this information needs. --Addingrefs  ( talk | contribs ) 19:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Indications" 

message: The picture suggests that humans have this muscle. This is also known as "tenderloin", for cows. Who else? Birds?
Chickens: The tenderloins are small pieces of white meat attached to the breasts. 
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.233.179.227 (talk) 04:08, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who has this muscle? (Article incomplete) 

message: The article uses medical Latin and other medical terminology to state even the simplest things.  This makes the article basically unreadable for anyone outside the medical professions.  Terms like "flexion", "lateral" and "piercing" are used in ways unlikely to make sense outside a dissection room.  Every profession has internal terminology that may be useful in internal communication but not outside.
It would be useful for someone with the knowledge to understand the article to translate it into regular English that can be read by most people afflicted with having this in their body (which is essentially everyone as it is apparently an ordinary body part). 77.213.197.146 (talk) 15:25, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much Latin
Talk:Psoas minor muscle

message: There is a reference for "absent in 40% of individuals", but most references I've looked at seem to agree on at least 50 per cent.  What about replacing this?
 / Raven in Orbit (Talk | contribs) 05:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gray's Anatomy, 40th edition says 40% --93.40.100.249 (talk) 21:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

text: My anatomy notes suggested it was only present in about 40% of the population. I'd defer to grays though. Shtanto (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absence
Talk:Iliacus muscle

message: I removed the following sections from the article because they lack references. --Addingrefs  ( talk | contribs ) 17:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unreferenced content 

message: I also removed the following gallery because most of the images are off-topic imho (and per Wikipedia:IG#Image galleries). --Addingrefs  ( talk | contribs ) 17:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed gallery 

message: This is not mentioned under actions, but based on the line of pull, it looks like this muscle would work to rotate the thigh as the psoas does. Is this something we could add or mention to the page? Dictabeard (talk) 23:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rotation
Talk:Gluteus medius

message: Question regarding action
Why is the term "abduct" in quotation marks and why is action explain in a very drawn out manner when a simple "The gluteus medius is involved in hip abduction" would suffice? This is an article about the gluteus medius not on what abduction is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.173.233.86 (talk) 20:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Piriformis muscle

message: There is a small inaccuracy in the depiction of the piriformis on the schematic posterior view image (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Posterior_Hip_Muscles_1.PNG). The muscle originates from the ANTERIOR aspect of the sacrum  and as such its origin should be shaded in the image. The way it appears now (non-shaded) it arises from the posterior sacral surface.N1of2 (talk) 03:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Image inaccuracy
Talk:List of bishops of Turku

message: The article as it is currently written is a bit confusing. At one point it says "Saint Henry, Bishop of Uppsala, is often mentioned as the first Bishop of Finland", but then later says "his position as the Bishop of Finland is however totally unhistorical, and not claimed even by the legends."   How does "often mentioned" differ from "legend"? And the term "unhistorical" is confusing because there are "historic claims" although clearly they are not contemporary or official records.
I would propose that the article should ne amended to say that "According to claims made in the 16th century, Saint Henry, Bishop of Uppsala was the first Bishop of Turku. However,there are no contemporary church records supporting the claim, but equally there are no other persons for whom the claim is made".  
The words "legend" and "unhistorical" in the English language seem to falsify the claim. But history cannot always be supported by documents and reported history, sometimes not contemporary, is often all that is left. If there are historical records recording another figure as being the first Bishop of Turku, then clearly my proposal would not be acceptable, but it is not clear to me that that is the case.   --Tom 09:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Legends do not claim that Henry was a Bishop of Finland. The claims have been made by much later historians, who have wanted to see Henry as a purely Finnish bishop, not as a Bishop of Uppsala who just happened to get killed in Finland. These claims are not based on any historical or legendary material, they are just speculations from historians. Henry started to appear as the first in the line of Bishops of Turku in order to emphasize the Swedish heritage that the Finnish church allegedly had, eventually being referred to as a Bishop of Turku as well. The first known Bishop of Finland (Turku) is Thomas, even though there certainly were bishops before him, however without surviving names. --Drieakko 11:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishop Henry as First Bishop of Turku 

message: The President of Finland was in some sense the head of the church until 1997, when the election of bishops was returned back to the church. This has, however, nothing to do with the title of the see, which has been since 1817 "Archbishop of Turku and Finland". --MPorciusCato 12:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title of the see
Talk:Obturator internus muscle

message: There is conflicting information in this article - under origin and insertion it says that it arises from the ventral primary rami of L5 and S1, then under the box on the right it says L5, S1, S2. IsaacD (talk) 00:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi IsaacD! As far as I can see, this issue has been resolved. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 12:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Information
Talk:Inferior gemellus muscle

message: NERVE SUPPLY?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.102.107 (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Stub merged to Gemelli muscles which also covers superior gemellus muscle. --Iztwoz (talk) 16:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub merged
Talk:Superior gemellus muscle

message: NERVE SUPPLY?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.102.107 (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Merged with inferior gemellus muscle to Gemelli muscles. --Iztwoz (talk) 16:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Quadratus femoris muscle

message: I keep running into a very confusing issue.  The "quadrate tubercle" link here sends me to the "tubercle of the femur" article.  However, I know that the quadrate tubercle is on the intertrochanteric crest, which is on the posterior side of the femur.  I am unsure whether the quadrate tubercle and the tubercle of the femur are the same thing.  Either the "tubercle of the femur" article incorrectly displays an anterior view of the femur, or the link to the "tubercle of the femur" is an inappropriate link.  Bobsagat (talk) 00:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vastus lateralis muscle

message: is the plural "vasti laterales"?  71.87.23.22 (talk) 20:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural 

message: Writing as a scientist but as a layman in anatomy/biology, I find the amount of jargon in this article rendering it completely unreadable. I have this complaint about many anatomy articles on Wikipedia. 76.250.36.231 (talk) 03:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: My background is the same, and (more than three years later) I have the same complaint. It would be refreshing if someone who can understand what is written here would rewrite it at an encyclopedic level that can be understood by an intelligent layperson and not just by medical professionals. As it is, only the inbox tells us which movement of the leg this muscle is responsible for; let's put basic information like this in the article itself. Thanks in advance for your contribution. Piperh (talk) 15:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. Thanks for pointing this out, . I've tried to translate this into lay English as much as possible, please let me know what you think. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

text: Tom, thanks for your valuable improvements. I'm still missing any mention except in the infobox of what movement of the leg this muscle provides, so I've added a sentence expressing this (accurately, I hope) in terms that a layperson should be able to understand.Piperh (talk) 09:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jargon 

message: The single image attached is somewhat misleading as the highlighted muscle in the image is actually the sartorius.  The Vastus lateralis is also shown but not highlighted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.135.190.101 (talk) 19:45, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Vastus intermedius muscle

message: Neither the picture in the infobox nor Gray's image below depicts the vastus intermedius muscle. The drawing inside the infobox shows the rectus femoris muscle.  --Uwe Gille 22:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pics 

message: Can you see it when you do a leg extension, or just the other three?  And how does it function as opposed to the other three?  I am asking because I have some patella problems and can't really squat, deadlift, or leg press.  But I can do leg extensions.  And especially if I emphasize completion of the movement (with an isometric at the top).  I do ahead and concentrate in turn, on each visible head, so that it gets development.  And even touch them, while doing so.  but if I can't see or feel the one underneath, what should I do?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.246.145.33 (talk) 00:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  is it under the RF?
Talk:Vastus medialis

message: It would be good if the article cited a source for the claim that the VMO is a "clinical myth."
Speedarius (talk) 08:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It

message: What's the deal - does the VMO exist? what does it do? Aaadddaaammm (talk) 13:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert needed 

message: Short, unsourced stub that would be better covered in the body of the main article, with the context it gives LT910001 (talk) 06:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Obliquus genu]] 