Wikipedia talk:Korea-related topics notice board/Proposals

message: ====August Collaboration====
This is an approval vote, to decide on the Collaboration of the Month for August 2005.  You may vote for as many options as you wish.  You may also nominate additional articles.
* Korean language
*# Supoort. Has many facts should be added and modified. E.g. ㅡ has been recognized as ; ㅚ, ㅟ, ㅐ, and vowel lengths facing extinction;  Consonants and their assimilation (see also Talk:Korean language#Concering IPA); Seoul dialect is technically different from the standard language used in South Korea; etc. --Puzzlet Chung 22:02, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Collaboration of the month

message: This is an approval vote, to decide on the Collaboration of the Month for August 2005.  You may vote for as many options as you wish.  You may also nominate additional articles.
* Korean language
*# Supoort. Has many facts should be added and modified. E.g. ㅡ has been recognized as ; ㅚ, ㅟ, ㅐ, and vowel lengths facing extinction;  Consonants and their assimilation (see also Talk:Korean language#Concering IPA); Seoul dialect is technically different from the standard language used in South Korea; etc. --Puzzlet Chung 22:02, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: August Collaboration

message: If you have an opinion as to whether a certain body of water should be called "East Sea" or "Sea of Japan" in Korea-related articles, please comment at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Korean)/Disputed names. -- Visviva 03:46, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it to current surveys and two of the Village pumps (guilty of crossposting, I know). I hope we can get many responses to help us reach consensus. Kokiri 08:47, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The East Sea Question

message: I suggest that we go through the naming convention step by step (i.e. section by section) and see if we're happy with it (just like the current (08:41, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me.  I'd also like to see us create a Korea-related MoS, covering finer points of usage, a la the China- and Japan-related MoS's.  -- Visviva 12:19, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions

message: I would like to propose a more in depth entry for Korean cinema and also create two sepearte pages: one for South Korean Cinema and one for North Korean Cinema. I know there is an existing page on Korean cinema, and while it is informational it focuses mainly on modern South Korean cinema post-1980 and is in rather dire need of cleaning up. I propose (and am willing to undertake) the creation of a new South Korean Cinema page and beginning a North Korean Cinema page. This new page will include a more in depth look at the history of Korean cinema (which is long and interesting). I just do not want to step on anyones toes, but I also feel that the current Cinema page is lacking in so much information and is in need of cleaning, we may as well begin a new page and include the information from that one. Rufus 0:13, September 14, 2005
: I would like to see You do this Rufus.  (I try to make entries on individual films as they come and I see them.)  The French Wik has much better descriptions of Korean films than we have:  They seem to follow a more or less standard format and really dig up info.  Maybe we should augment our entries with translations of the French  or at least look into adopting their format.   Kdammers211.225.32.226 09:46, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Korean Cinema?