lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Capture of Guam

message: I really don't like the term native being used on the article. They should be refered to as the people of Guam or as Guamanians. See Stand Ye Guamanians.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  People of Guam 

message: The infobox says, "... the United States acquires its first Pacific Ocean territory" I think that this is technically incorrect. The capture of Guam gave the U.S. control over the island, but did not amount to annexation of the island as a U.S. Territory. At the time, the Hawaiian Islands were governed by the Provisional Government of Hawaii which was then lobbying for annexation by the United States. This government maintained power until the U.S. annexed Hawaiʻi on July 4, 1898. The U.S. dodn't acquire Guam until the signing of the Treaty of Paris on December 10, 1898 (or, arguably, not until ratification of the treaty by the U.S. Senate in February of 1899). Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result in infobox 

message: I must note that this article is written in an un-encyclopedic tone.  Portions of it are more appropriate to a magazine article or other light reading (e.g., "the little whaleboat"), while some portions are almost worshipful, raising POV issues (e.g., the description of the Guamanian soldiers' happiness at surrendering).  Can this be remedied?  I got the "little".
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Un-encyclopedic tone 

message: I wonder whether the term "brass beer checks" used in the article is correct? I don't know what this means, and neither a search of Wikipedia nor Google have thus far been helpful. If this is correct, I suggest a cross reference or explanation. If it is not, it should be corrected.Bill (talk) 23:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brass beer checks?
Talk:William Thomas Blanford

message: This article says, "He had been elected F.R.S. In. 1874, ...." This could be a typo for "F.R.S. in 1874", or the "In." could be an abbreviation for "India", in which case it should be spelled out, for clarity. I cannot tell which it should be, I do not have access to the 1911 Britannica, and Google is no help. Could some knowledgeable person please fix this? — Nowhither 20:34, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's fixed now. And correctly too; I found a 1911 Britannica, and it says "in". — Nowhither 21:22, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: FRS In
Talk:Battle of Chojnice (1454)

message: * 00:25, 9 February 2008 Piotrus (Talk | contribs) restored "Battle of Chojnice" ‎ (24 revisions restored: merging histories)
* 00:24, 9 February 2008 Piotrus (Talk | contribs) deleted "Battle of Chojnice" ‎ (preparing to merge histories) 
* 00:24, 9 February 2008 Piotrus (Talk | contribs) m (moved Battle of Konitz to Battle of Chojnice: merging) (undo)
WTF was done here? I remember having edited the article, it's still on my watchlist, but my name was erased form the history. The Polish POV is ridiculous, Polish place names as Gdańsk as usual, but even the leaders of the Order troops are given polonized names here. Will future articles on English Wikipedia mention a German emperor named Wiłhęłmski? -- Matthead  Discuß   13:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 
Talk:Battle of San Patricio

message: , the sentence "In October, Texians, English-speaking settlers in the Mexican border region of Texas, took up arms in what became known as the Texas Revolution." maybe could be tweaked.  It wasn't just the English-speaking settlers in the border areas, because the extended (Victoria area) De Leon clan was aligned with Stephen F. Austin and others. I know José María Jesús Carbajal signed the Goliad Declaration of Independence as M. Carbajal. According to the Poyo book Tejano Journey, Plácido Benavides had a company of 30 border area Tejanos at the Oct 1835 Battle of Goliad. — Maile  (talk) 21:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. In October, it was just the Anglos.  It spread after that.  I'll fix this later this week. (Thanks for the map change too.) Karanacs (talk) 20:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background section sentence 

message: Back in the day, wasn't it technically Bagdad, Tamaulipas? MX (✉ • ✎) 14:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mexican port town of Matamoros" 

message: Link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_San_Patricio lead to page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark
Why? 
Not anymore. Please ignore this.
78.45.47.67 (talk) 00:42, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denmark
Talk:Battle of Goliad

message: San Luis Potosí? That can't be right: the article itself refers to Monterrey, half the distance to SLP, and that's without thinking of the cities along the Río Bravo such as Laredo, Reynosa, Matamoros... Aille (talk) 22:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: closest Mexican settlement?

message: Inder "Aftermath" the following fragment appears: "Goliad won."  This should at least not be a fragment and possibly should not be there at all. Peter Flass (talk) 11:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: On checking the history, I found that an anonymous user added those words last December, and I have now removed them. Well spotted! BencherliteTalk 11:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence fragment 

message: This battle appears to be missing one of it's belligerents.
~ the meccaneer (talk) 17:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: So it was.  I looked through the history and fixed it, . Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belligerents
Talk:Battle of Concepción

message: i found this to be a really good, factual, and overall helpful article. GOOD WORK wikipedia!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.178.138.110 (talk) 21:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: EXCEPTIONAL....

message: Perhaps the word Texian should be explained and contrasted with the word Tejano, explaining that the fighters were not the original inhabitants of the area but rather immigrants from the expanding United States.  ColerBB (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of word 'Texian'
Talk:Battle of Agua Dulce

message: When you click on James Grant, it takes you to a disambiguation page on which none of the listed people seem to be the person mentioned in this article. Either the hyperlink should be taken off of the name, or the name should be routed to an article entitled "James Grant (Texas revolution)" or something.
The way to make it display "James Grant" but link to "James Grant (Texas Revolution)" would be to do as follows
[[James Grant {Texas Revolution)|James Grant]]
which would show up as the following:
James Grant
:This has been done. Billingd (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Grant Page
Talk:William Saunders (botanist)

message: @Glendoremus I saw your  and need to tell you  that per WP:WNTRMT: You should not remove maintenance templates if any of the following apply: You do not understand the issues raised by the template. So I'm going to restore the tag after this edit.
Here's what I find needs to be changed (emphasis on the problematic words):1. Saunders' most important contributions dealt with the propagation of fruit trees and grape vines.2. authored hundreds of articles on horticulture and introduced numerous plant species into the United StatesOn a different note: The William_Saunders_(botanist)#Grange section is still unsourced please add a source or remove the section.Again, please read WP:WTRMT to see when to remove the template and when not. Nobody (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for sharing your concerns. I changed the phrase "most important contributions" but felt like "numerous" was a perfectly reasonable way to characterize the large number of plant species he introduced. This characterization is supported in the text with details and appropriate citations. I'll leave it to another editor to review and decide when to remove the template. Glendoremus (talk) 02:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacock Terms in the article
Talk:Robbie Robertson

message: In light of how most biographical Wikipedia articles are written, it's peculiar that in the Personal section nothing more in said about Dominique Bourgeois, Robbie's first wife and mother of three of his children. As he explained in Testament, she was French Canadian from Quebec, they met in France, and she was an aficionado of poetry. Also, I believe she was some sort of counsellor or psychotherapist in her professional life.
As well, although Robbie's marriage date with Dominique is given in the Personal section, after that Robbie's marriage to his current wife is the next item — but no divorce year from wife number one. I'm pretty sure Robbie is not a bigamist.Joel Russ (talk) 15:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife & mother of three children 

message: The cause of death was prostate cancer according to TMZ, The Music Universe, and CBC:
https://www.tmz.com/2023/08/09/robbie-robertson-the-band-dead-dies/
https://themusicuniverse.com/bands-robbie-robertson-dies/
https://www.cbc.ca/music/robbie-robertson-film-scores-martin-scorsese-1.6932531 76.179.4.56 (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death 

message: Someone keeps changing the divorce date for his marriage to Dominique bourgeois. Robbie and Dominique’s divorce was finalized in 2003. For some reason, there is an editor who keeps changing it to 1977. This is absolutely incorrect. 104.175.40.101 (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divorce date
Talk:Armenia, Colombia

message: The link for the flag on this article is for the Republic of Armenia. I would fix this myself, but strangely the Flag Link field in the infobox already doesn't exist, and if I add it without any value in source then the link remains regardless. Someone who knows more about infoboxes please fix. Gawgitta (talk) 23:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag Link
Talk:Martha Plimpton

message: In accordance with the policies for biographies of living persons, birthdates and other personal information of a living subject must meet a higher standard of verification and be based on reliable secondary sources.  Info scraped from  tertiary sources like IMDB is not sufficiently verifiable, and self-published information is subject to the guidelines of primary sources.
If any editors have access to, or know of, a reliable secondary source for Plimpton's age in particular, please feel free to update the article with an adequate citation.
- Headphase (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age - reliable sources needed
Talk:Brit shalom (naming ceremony)

message: :Brit shalom is recognized by organizations affiliated in Secular Humanistic Judaism (including the Society for Humanistic Judaism, the Congress of Secular Jewish Organizations, and the International Institute for Secular Humanistic Judaism), but not by any group generally considered to be a part of mainstream Judaism.
It's a weird statement. Especially the italic and bold part. How is it determined that these groups are not mainstream? I can try and reword it. ImTheIP (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: mainstream Judaism

message: I propose Brit rechitzah be merged into this article. It's a subset of brit shalom ceremonies, and is better explained in their context than in a separate article. It's also either a stub or just barely not -- in either case, not a particularly overwhelming amount of text. Vaticidalprophet 11:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Unopposed. Guarapiranga (talk) 10:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 17:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The 2nd paragraph in the Popularity section is too polluted with refs (some of them cited multiple times). — Guarapiranga ☎ 05:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it, I think (though I've now recreated the same situation in the lede 😬). — Guarapiranga ☎ 02:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:OVERREF]] 

message: I've encountered quite a few RS articles speaking against brit shalom (which nonetheless add to its notability):
 — Guarapiranga ☎ 08:06, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article needs a ''Critics'' section
Talk:SCons

message: Is this going to be like emerge? --Terrible Tim 21:21, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They're two completely different beasts, SCons attempts to be an all-in-one tool while Portage is a front-end to many programs. --ren 19:49, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Next-generation, improved, easier, more reliable, faster... It sounds really like a Neutral POV [/sarcasm] --ren 19:52, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say, after the edits by 130.164.71.111 this is now NPOV, so I removed the tag. --Allefant 16:02, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: From the article:
"Automatic dependency analysis built-in for C, C++ and Fortran." 
and then: 
"Built-in support for C, C++, D, Java, Fortran, Objective-C, Yacc, Lex, Qt and SWIG, and building TeX and LaTeX documents. Other languages or file types can be supported through user-defined Builders for other languages or file types."
Does that mean that D, Java, Objective-C, Yacc, Lex, Qt, SWIG and LaTeX are not fully supported? 
Well, in the Java case, I guess the dependency is deduced by the compiler but what about the other languages/tools? don't they need dependency analysis?Ori 19:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The features listed are from http://scons.org - so best ask there I guess. --Allefant (talk) 10:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Built in support 

message: I just checked some "notable applications" using SCons. And I found some of them actually used CMake! Indeed, I found `CMakeLists.txt` files instead of `SConstruct` files in the top source directories. These applications seem to use CMake instead of SCons:
* Aqsis
* Delta3D
Should these two references be deleted from the list or were they really using SCons for some time (and maybe we should specify the dates they stopped using SCons if the two entries are not deleted) ?
-- Aither (Talk to me) 16:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say, delete them. This section is about applications using scons, not ones having used it at some point in the past. --Allefant (talk) 03:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Looks Chromium/Google Chrome switched from scons (which was used as of July 2009) to a make-based system they call "ninja".  Here's their current build instructions. So I've removed it from the article. --kostmo (talk) 07:39, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable applications using SCons? 

message: Just removed one link added on rev. 83750835, because it's not directly related to SCons and does not add any useful knowledge to the subject.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.153.105.239 (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: the history section is duplicated 2001:A61:2A22:D601:5CDB:B0CF:FD00:E56E (talk) 19:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:Interstate 82

message: Can we get a map which has state borders or other landmarks to make it actually usable?  The current one is pretty hard to follow, given that it doesn't have any obvious landmarks.  --Jayron32 03:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You can file a request at WP:USRD/MTF/R, but unfortunately our map makers are inactive right now. --Rschen7754 03:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improved map 

message: Just removed the above passage from the article, since there's no decent citation out there despite it being a true (but niche) fact. Will add it back if there's ever a good one found. SounderBruce 06:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section: Interstate numbering 

message: Hello! I am Ethan369 (talk) 17:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The numbering issue is addressed in the article; I-84 was I-80N prior to 1980, and thus I-82 was numbered correctly. It is part of a longer east-west corridor (Seattle to Salt Lake City), so an even number was given. Please don't use talk pages as a forum in the future. SounderBruce 01:11, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Section: Why is I-82 named that?
Talk:Tyson Ritter

message: The picture is not the best...If anyone has a better one, would you do us all a favor and replace it? This one makes him look - er - strange and otherwise "inhumanly thin." Thanks!
Image:tysonritter.jpg|Tyson Ritter
He is inhumanly thin. However, that picture is bad, it was probably just someone who took it at a concert. I'm going to try to find a better one that is also fair use. FinalWish 02:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it won't. If you read the tag you placed under the image, it clearly says "for identification and critical commentary on the music video in question". I'm afraid it will have to be removed.  I just remembered, I took a quite alright photo when I met him. Maybe I'll post that one. --HarryCane 13:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

text: To be honest, I don't consider it that hard. As I said, I met him and took a decent photo of him. For single musicians, a free picture is pretty easy to come by most of the time. When you're looking for band shots, that's where it's getting tricky (see e.g. Hit the Lights, Hawthorne Heights, The Early November, etc.). --HarryCane 15:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I took a bunch of stuff out....there's no way most of it can be verified. If you want to add it back in be sure and also include some links/cites/resources...thanks! Rx StrangeLove 23:12, 4 April 2006
:Right, the entire trivia section needs to be verified. The part about the home in Santa Rosa Beach is especially sketchy. There is no proof that the Tyson Ritter on that site is the Tyson Ritter from the All-American Rejects. --HarryCane 17:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  verification 

message: * Tyson Ritter, the lead singer of The All-American Rejects was born in a Van Halen concert.
That unsourced statement was in the Van Halen article where it is irrelevant.  It's also in this articles history but removed, if sourced it might have a place in this article. SchmuckyTheCat 20:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Van Halen birth

message: Took out the piece that someone put "HE IS THE HOTTIEST MAN ALIVE!" because please it is vandal.(Dalmation 08:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out! 

message: Lets try this again. Help expand and add sources if you want this page to stay.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyb222 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Good idea. Caden cool 05:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, he still fails WP:MUSIC - the page should remain as a redirect to the band article, where relevant info can be added Nouse4aname (talk) 09:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi

message: We should add Tyson Ritter's discography after all he is a music artist J4Fun (talk) 04:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Discography 

message: There should be a section added adressing his friendship with "serial rapist" Max Landis. Source: https://twitter.com/uptomyknees1985/status/1423947254734282757?s=20 MisfitBlitz (talk) 08:02, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it as it was beyond inappropriate. – 2.O.Boxing 08:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max Landis
Talk:Joint dislocation

message: i have had a dislocation in my shoulder. I heard that if a joint is dislocated, after it heals it can easily be dislocated again. Is that true?
: Yes, there will be a tendency towards easier dislocation, therefore surgical reparation of the damaged joint capsule and ligaments may be necessary. Rehabilitation from a Physical Therapist is the usual treatment. -- Fyslee 10:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:   I had a dislocated shoulder 40 years ago.  It repeated a few times in the few next years and then stopped, either because it healed or because I learned not to stress it.  I never saw a doctor about it.   Do they heal?  50.180.19.238 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 23:53, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

text: I would recommend seeing a Physical Therapist.  If they give you therapy, they may be able to strengthen the muscles around the joint to prevent any new problems.  Also, they can see about range of motion and any other problems.  That's what I did, although the damage was done by multiple dislocations. MrPsychic 03:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dislocation 

message: i have had a dislocation in the same shoulder twice. I want to know about the side effects of a surgery and is it reccommended or is strengthening the organs around the dislocated shoulder suffiecent? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.42.21.83 (talk) 20:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dislocated Shoulder This article may be of some help, it does have several good links.  If you have any other questions, ask the surgeon about it, or your physical therapist.
how do you identify a dislocation and what do you do after you know its a dislocation  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barny Fife (talk • contribs) 20:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  surgery or not 

message: I'm thinking of adding some facts about the epidemiology of patellar dislocations, I will not change any information that is already there. I'm going to use an article about the incidence of acute traumatic patellar dislocation with members of the US military. Wendykayo (talk) 03:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Information about Patellar Dislocations 

message: I am adding a section about the epidemiology of finger dislocations, I will not change already existing information. I am using a ystematic review about the Epidemiology of Finger Dislocations Presenting for Emergency Care Within the United States. Wardam (talk) 03:50, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epidemiology of Finger Dislocations  

message: I am planning to add some more epidemiology about anterior and posterior Jensenbh (talk) 03:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding to Epidemiology Section: Hip Dislocations
Talk:Interstate 184

message: Should it be mentioned anywhere that locals just call this "the connector"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.164.95 (talk) 23:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

message: Where is the east end? The merge with US 20-26 or 13th Street? --NE2 02:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Removed a passage with the claim that I-84 Business Loop was signed, which does appear on the ITD history page, but is not backed up by newspaper or ITD sources from the time. SounderBruce 09:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-84 Bus. Loop
Talk:Operation Léa

message: Tidied prose, blammed a few typos and tidied references but in sfn as I buggered up the < > ones. Keith-264 (talk) 10:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: there might be something here for the article.Keith-264 (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  p. 26 Keith-264 (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

text: pp. 39-40 Keith-264 (talk) 18:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE