Talk:Highways in Poland

message: I think this article should be renamed to "Roads in Poland", because there's already "Expressways in Poland", and in this article should be more general info on roads in Poland.--83.242.88.168 (talk) 15:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: The history section ignores the fact that the first motorways (dual carriageways, freeways) built in the territory of present-day Poland were parts of the prewar German autobahns. For example, in Silesia a stretch from Chojnów (then Haynau) to Legnica (then Liegnitz), including Wrocław (then Breslau ) — which is today part of the Polish A4 — was opened before WWII. (On the German side of the present-day border this route is now numbered E40.) 
There were other sections completed before the war, notably including a stretch from Elbląg (ex-Elbing) to near Kaliningrad (ex-Königsberg), which for more than 40 years was blocked by the closed Soviet-Polish border across the former East Prussia. These ex-autobahn pieces are historically significant and relevant to the history section of this article.
Sca (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing history

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Highways in Poland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130127093513/http://www.stat.gov.pl/gus/5840_748_PLK_HTML.htm to http://stat.gov.pl/gus/5840_748_PLK_HTML.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have changed the outlook of the table for expressways, if you are a viewer of this page or especially if you're one of the users who had been taking part in updating the table in the older days, please tell if you find the new version nicer, or less nice, or if you have other suggestions.
The reason for the change is I think the previous table was - in case of expressways, since there are many of them - not very readable for people who just want to get a quick overview of construction progress. And on English Wikipedia as opposed to Polish I think it's more common to look at a table like this in order to get a quick look at which highways are ready, which of the planned ones will be ready within few years, which later, and which are just indeed 'planned' but there might be a lot of time until they're done. In the current version of table one needed to spend a lot of time to really get such overview, because it was not apparent at the first sight if e.g. the 100 km "in realisation" is out of 120 remaining, or out of 200 remaining, one needed to calculate it in the head.
And it was even harder (impossible, really) to distinguish a road like S5 (which within 2 years will be completed 100% in what used-to-be S5 in the plans, but just another section was added 2 years ago, so this one is in early stage of development) from a road like S7 which has a large progress but any major section (like Gdańsk - Warsaw) will not be finished soon. And this is what most foreigners probably are more interested - that the main 2/3rds will be a 100% highway soon or that no section will be 100% highway but all in construction - than "this road is 57% constructed".   
In the new arrangement, all the data is still here for those who want to know exact details up to every kilometer, there's even more data for this than before. But more importantly, I think now it is much clearer for those who don't dig deep, to just get an overview of how the state of construction really is, and which roads are really actively developed and which are only plans for some future. The price for it is that the table now has 6 more entries, but I believe the clarity wins over this slight increase in length. Please tell if you agree, or if you would prefer the old version to come back, or if you have ideas for something even better.
I have done also quite several earlier changes (I hope, less debatable), if you want to compare the table to how it was before my meddling then see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Highways_in_Poland&oldid=868874086. Cheers
Kirt93 (talk) 21:58, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New experimental outlook of construction progress table 

message: Is there definitely a need to present all distances in metric and converted to Imperial, as doing so seems to me to come at the expense of lots of noise in the tables. If there were no such need, I would definitely move to remove them. 178.16.1.92 (talk) 10:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance unit conversions 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion