Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive RuneScape/Archive 2

message: Note: I would like to mention that all conversation here takes place when the RuneScape task force was a separate WikiProject with the exception of 9. Welcome and beyond. The move had not yet taken place at that time as the move was discussed in the 8th section. Greeves (talk • contribs) 13:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I am the founder of this project again... I am continuing from the first message i had. As you are aware I do not know how to organise this project and I have Secondary School to attend to. I only contribute to wikipedia because the contributers help me know more things and even help me cite them for prjects! I am not a wikiholic but I will stay up to date.
Thank you for contributing participants, keep editing! :-)
--[[User:Storkian|Storkian] 21:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you participants 

message: Is it OK if I put my name down? Can I just join? - • The Giant Puffin • 09:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After the initiation ritual, yes. :-P Sure, feel free! Not that i'm in charge, thats just what everyone else does. CaptainVindaloo t c e 18:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody's in charge really, I just put the pages together with a participants list alone, no requirements/duties/etc.  If we need some sort of a hierarchy we can make one, but right now there's no real need.  As long as you pay up your monthly fee of cookies you'll be fine (and please, put your name in alphabetical order :P).  Agentscott00(talk) 18:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joining 

message: A quick search brings up these:
*
*
* --(Listed for deletion--Agentscott00(talk) 02:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to all the RuneScapeWikipedians out there, but Wookieepedia is on AfD/DRV every other week, and that has been featured in notable/reliable third party publications. I don't think RSW has had such coverage. As for Storkian's image, its a simple matter of an orphaned fairuse image, so we need to find it a home or let it go. Its got JPG artifacts, but it gets a pretty good profile of a typical game avatar into 10kB. CaptainVindaloo t c e 16:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rogue subpage patrol

message: I am just wondering, why was this WikiProject done in the form of a portal? Greeves 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the design at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Turnkey_Project, taken from the French Wikipedia, and used it for my userpage.  When this project came along, I had a bit of experience with turnkey, and thought it would look nice, so I decided to give it a shot, and designed the project (after its initial creation) using the turnkey template, as it looks better than a regular white page with a bunch of text.  There's no real reason, just to make it look nice/organized.  Agentscott00(talk) 04:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curiosity killed the cat... 

message: Gods really urgently needs its sources adding. Would anyone object to me changing the Current Collaboration to this? CaptainVindaloo t c e 21:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll go ahead and do it.. Agentscott00(talk) 00:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the meantime, my sandbox has a copy of the page where we can do a re-write.  I might start working on it later in the week, but go ahead and start if you want to. Agentscott00(talk) 05:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[RuneScape gods]] sources

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 17:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: Just so everyone knows. I've redirected it to RuneScape combat, lets hope it stays that way or we'll have to get it deleted a third time. CaptainVindaloo t c e 00:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should redirect to the Locations page. After all, Castle Wars is the location of a mini-game that involves combat.--Ed ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 02:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{lx|1=|2={{ucfirst:Castle Wars}}|3=Talk|4=talk}} recreated

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support - As the nominator, my reasons are above. Also, please visit #Is this WikiProject really necessary? as I have more reasons as to why there is no need to have this as a separate WikiProject. I now see that there needs to be some form of collaboration and especially anti-vandalism stuff on the RS pages. There still can't really be a separate WikiProject for it though. Greeves 23:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Welcome RuneScape WikiProject members! Welcome as the new task force on WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games. I hope as being a part of WikiProject MMOs that this task force and the WikiProject as a whole advances. Greeves 22:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yay! I truly hope we can get more input from the MMOG Project, since we've been trying to acheive FA status for RuneScape for over a month now.--Ed ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 23:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome 

message: I created a project banner in order to identify RS articles as within the scope of this task force. It's mostly a preliminary template, and I still have to find a GFDL or public domain image for the banner.-Ed ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 05:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good - • The Giant Puffin • 13:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great! Although... normally task forces do not have a separate banner. I am in the process of removing those new banners (sorry!) and adding the following code to the main project banner: |task force=RuneScape This code will provide a little addition to the banner with a link and logo for the task force. I am wondering if Ed could speed delete the original template as I believe he can do that if he created it. By the way, it's not that I don't like the template, it's just not normal to have a banner for a project task force and especially with that cruft template as well, the templates are very numbered. Greeves (talk • contribs)  04:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't get it deleted, because it's in template space. There's nothing in deletion policy that can get the template deleted. I think we should just keep the template for future reference.--Ed ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 02:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright! Either way works. The template isn't causing any harm staying in template space anyway. Remember that for RuneScape-related articles, please type  on the article's talk page. Greeves (talk • contribs)  22:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So that everyone is up to date on this, should we add this to the template box on this task force's page?--Ed ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 23:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it me, or is :Image:Rds.JPG a fair use image? Sorry to be a killjoy, i'm just a little worried about it. CaptainVindaloo t c e 00:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, but I'll have to check Image copyright policy on that.--Ed ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 01:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The public domain license tag is applicable, since Ryanclarke1 recreated the image with originality. (He added "RS" to the image.--Ed ¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 02:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Banner 

message: An article on  has been created from an old redirect. Just so everyone knows. CaptainVindaloo t c e 21:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, thats probably going to get deleted - • The Giant Puffin • 13:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[DeviousMUD]]