lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Safra Group

message: Part of the text (e.g. the Strategy section) looks like it's been copied from one of the company's marketing brochures. It's at least NPOV, if not raw plagiary. It would be a good idea to remove or rewrite the text. Lachambre 17:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The History section is taken directly from http://www.safrabank.com/About_Family.html.  I believe that constitutes plagiarism.  Stevenmitchell 08:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLAGIARISM 

message: BLP worries make it hard to mention the Madoff affair here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.145.214 (talk) 14:22, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See a Bing search on "Madoff Safra".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.162.31 (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP 

message: The reference to steam and electricity in the article is all very well, but it is not new to most of us.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.254.83 (talk) 11:37, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not new
Talk:Arabian leopard

message: In 2010, the Strategy for the Conservation of the Leopard in the Arabian Peninsula was published but is not yet mentioned in the article. I currently don't have the time to integrate it into the article, but thought maybe someone else would like to start on this?Robuer (talk) 07:23, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation Strategy 

message: This map is out of date; unfortunately, there are no longer any confirmed leopards in the Negev desert or near the Dead Sea. These areas should be changed to the yellow Historic color Bbreslau (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Update 

message: Does this really mean that lots were described in 1830 and this is the smallest of the 1830 batch? Or should it perhaps say that this is the smallest of ALL leopard subspecies, and also it was described in 1830? Equinox ◑ 14:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworded the intro to be less confusing. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:32, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the smallest leopard subspecies that was described in 1830" ?
Template talk:FAPath

message: Shouldn't the Peer Review be before checking against the FA criteria? — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, because before submitting to peer review an article should have already been checked against the FA criteria. Peer review's purpose is for other editors to make sure it fits what they think constitutes the FA criteria. — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 02:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of path

message: I think maybe getting the article to Good Article status should be in there somewhere before the FA step. Any comments? Voyaging(talk) 23:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article?
Talk:Barbary leopard

message: The IUCN page cited in the article gives this animal's common English name as "North African Leopard". What is the source for the common name being "Barbary Leopard?" -- Donald Albury 21:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Leo1pard (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: One reason is that this page was a stub, and African leopard had places where it could have been expanded. Leo1pard (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I redirected ''Barbary leopard'' into ''African leopard''
Talk:Caraval

message: How about a sample photo of one of these animals, preferably of good quality?  Remember copyright rules.  Seduisant 00:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a Photo 
Talk:Carriage of Goods by Sea Act

message: Following wikification, these questions spring to mind.
* When was the original act passed?
* At this time, how much was £100 worth - early in the 20th century, this was $480. Suggested formulation, depending on correct conversion:
: It increased the amount that shipowners would have to pay cargo owners for damage in transit from GBP100 (then US$480) per package to $500 per package
* Citations particularly for "some courts agreed" and the final paragraph.
* I've removed some of the most blatant POV phrasing, but the article still feels slightly biassed in parts.
* What happened before COGSA? Does it still apply?
Don't answer here: change the main article.
Eludium-q36 17:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Further development

message: It appears that section 46USC30701 doesn't exist.  See gpo.gov. HausTalk 17:26, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Item 3
Talk:Panthera gombaszoegensis

message: Hi! Looking at this file, is it possible to get pictures of fossils and the reconstitution of this cat? --92.142.49.232 (talk) 16:54, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: *I propose to move European jaguar to Panthera gombaszoegensis. Reason: the current title of 'European jaguar' is misleading (most do not consider it a subspecies of jaguar); also for consistency- the majority of other prehistoric cats are under their binomial name (Panthera crassidens, Panthera youngi, Panthera zdanskyi, etc.]]).--SilverTiger12 (talk) 14:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see this. Leo1pard (talk) 10:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request Move 

message: Both Panthera toscana and Panthera schreuderi seem to have been accepted as junior synonyms of this species- there are no mentions of P. schreuderi in Google Scholar since 2016 that I could find, and none for P. toscana as an independent species (the name seems to be used as a subspecies name by some workers). Since neither of the two synonyms are notable in and of themselves, I propose that they be merged & redirected to P. gombaszoegensis here. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The age for P. gombaszoegensis in this article is also wrong, this article indicates that they were still extant after 424 kya, well after the supposed "1.95−1.77 million years ago" range, given this I also think the first appearance date is also likely to be inaccurate. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually the paper gives an upper range of 2.0 Mya, so near dead on. Also I would recommend WP:BOLDLY merging. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing is, I effectively began the merge process a long time ago, transferring all the relevant information and sources to this article from the other. This is kind of the final nail in the coffin- if the consensus is to merge, then I will blank and redirect the two articles. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 00:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Seems to be ok to redirect these 2 into this page, as several authors agreed with Hemmer's assessment of them being junior synonyms. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to consider bringing one or more of the images in, as this article is short on images. WolfmanSF (talk) 07:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Gaetulian lion

message: Very strange article. Is this about a subspecies of lions or is it just about literary descriptions of lions from Gaetulia? --Mlewan (talk) 07:21, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no subspecies of "Gaetulian lion", but ancients did refer to it as a distinct kind of lion, both in a literal and literary device. Romans also sometimes thought of barbarians as part animal (who even mated with animals), and would attribute animal qualities to their barbarian enemies. It was racism, in the same way 19th century slavers were racists about blacks and monkeys, some even likely believed they were not fully human. It makes slavery and genocide easier when they are animals. You can see hints of this in Flavius Philostratus's quote. This source describes in more detail  though it's a different Galatia, same idea. Nevertheless many of the quotes are about actual lions. -- GreenC 17:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. I tried to update the article to reflect that. Mlewan (talk) 22:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this about 

message: Please see/contribute to discussion at Talk:Lion#Request_for_comment:_How_many_subpages? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment
Talk:Lewis R. Freeman

message: RRFWTommartin (talk) 22:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Added photo and additional info on 1923 Grand Canyon river trip
Talk:Oncilla

message: I'll come back and fix it when I have time.  Seduisant (talk) 19:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs section 

message: I've changed the rating of this article to B.  It's shaping up nicely, with lots of info and good references.  Another picture would be nice... Seduisant (talk) 15:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: Shouldn't this species be mentioned under Leopardus?
Kortoso (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. However, it already is, so luckily there's no change required. Anaxial (talk) 09:24, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Leopardus''

message: A recent taxonomic assessment has recognised three species of tiger cat, adding Leopardus emiliae (Spanish language wikipedia article) to the earlier split. This seems to have been recognised by the ASM as they have included the species in their new biodiversity database, which has now been  officially released and is the online successor to MSW3.    Jts1882 | talk  10:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New species, ''Leopardus emiliae'' 

message: The text says it "inhabits elevations as high as 4500m in Colombia, in the Andean highlands in Ecuador and Peru" but on the map the part of Ecuador that is shown is not mountainous:  Omikroergosum (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution: description does not match map
Talk:Squier Jagmaster

message: This guitar is no longer mentioned in Fender catalogues (as of a couple of years ago), and seems to be discontinued. The article should be edited to reflect this.220.240.153.58 (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  discontinued?
Talk:Pantherinae

message: What are the sources for this classification?--Altaileopard 16:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pantherinae 

message: Can all species of Pantherinae be called panthers?--Humboldt
::No, actually only Leopards and sometimes Pumas are called Panthers.--Altaileopard 11:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen the term panther used in different ways, sometimes meaning any or all big cats, but usually meaning a black panther, which can be a leopard or jaguar.  Panther is also one of the many names of the puma. Crysm (talk) 23:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Panthers

message: Can the range map be updated to include a legend? 206.248.174.78 (talk) 08:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Anaxial (talk) 08:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Range map legend

message: The genus Acinonyx is listed both here and in Felinae. Which is it? Sophie means wisdom (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: At Felinae. The addition of Acinonys to Pantherinae was performed by a vandal earlier today, and has now been corrected. Anaxial (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two-timing cheetahs 

message: Snow leopard is in genus Panthera,not Uncia,the teal(Uncia) range map should be merged with green(Panthera).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.123.130.53 (talk) 06:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncia Panthera Range Merge 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 17:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views
Talk:Prionailurus

message: I've removed the stub classification for this article because (1) all six members of the genus have their own detailed articles, and (2) the article pretty much sums up genus P. adequately with a list of members, taxobox, and description of members of the genus, surely enough for the casual reader.  Since it's been stubbed for 3.5 years, this is probably as finished as the article is going to get.  Seduisant (talk) 00:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Stub Class 

message: Anyone aware of any literature on perhaps reclassifying this genus's species in relation to Felis?  The fact that cross-generic hybrids between, e.g., Prionailurus bengalensis and Felis catus produce fertile offspring, consistently, would seem to call into question this genus split.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  22:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification 

message: Are there any clues as to how to say this? If any of the species have such instruction, it would be useful to place it in this genus description. Kortoso  (talk) 07:53, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's named after the greek príōn (saw) + aílouros (cat), presumably referring to saw-like teeth, just as the prion (bird) was named after its saw-like bill. So the pronunciation will be /ˈpɹʌɪən/ and /aí̯.loː.ros/. References can be found for either part but without a reference for the whole name I don't think we can include it (original research or synthesis).   Jts1882 | talk  12:53, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that we shouldn't include pronunciation. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 13:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 
Talk:Therapy cat

message: I accidentally hit enter before I was finished writing my edit summary here. I meant to say... "Claim in caption that therapy cats "expedite recovery" is not supported by reliable sources for biomedical claims (WP:MEDRS), so I adjusted the wording in a way that doesn't require MEDRS. —PermStrump(talk) 21:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable. Yes we need more medical references.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image caption needs MEDRS 

message: I propose that Therapy cat should be merged into the Human interaction with cats article. Therapy cat is a stub, and the information could be neatly contained in a subsection ("Effects on human health") of the human interaction with cats article. ParticipantObserver (talk) 08:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems reasonable if the merger isn't a smokescreen for deletion; this Wikipedian will be watching what happens.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Krofne

message: This article describes the same (or almost the same) foods as Paczki. Maybe should be on the scope of some culinary project, if there is any. --BiblbroksTalk2me 18:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or maybe the same as Berliner (pastry) or maybe even Beignet. This last one would be much more similar to Uštipci in  serbian/serbocroatian/croatian (or whichever) cuisine. --BiblbroksTalk2me 18:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

text: If you are sure about redirecting Berliner (pastry) and Paczki to doughnut, why don't you propose this on their talk pages, too? If there comes to an agreement to this proposal, I will agree on the proposal to redirect Krafne to doughnut. But I better suggest this to be on the scope of some culinary project, first. --Biblbroks's talk 18:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no need to wait for other articles or a project. Other articles are other articles. Zocky | picture popups 03:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, there's no source about krafne being something different than a variant of Berliner, and it just duplicates the text in berliner and doughnut. --Eleassar my talk 19:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Did you read http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krofne&diff=442823359&oldid=382690497 ? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

text: I also agree that this article duplicates material at berliner and doughnut. It should be changed to a redirect. Doremo (talk) 07:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Same question as above... do the ingredients differ or do they not? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The ingredients sound like typical doughnut ingredients. There are lots of kinds of doughnuts and you can find recipes that have lemon peel, rum, mace, cinnamon, blueberries, whatever ... there's not just one doughnut recipe. So I do not believe that krofne ingredients make them non-doughnuts. Doremo (talk) 17:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yngwie Malmsteen Stratocaster

message: ...This Fender Artist signature guitar unleashes the fury...
Nice touch. 72.12.163.230 00:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The left-handed guitar (the one on the right in the picture) is not an Yngwie Signature model as it has 22 frets and an unprinted headstock. Could someone remove this picture, or maybe crop it? Facemelt 04:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Busytown

message: I suspect the content on a musical version at the Capitol Theatre in Sydney is completely fictional.  Not referenced, the The Lion King was playing at the theatre at that time (see https://www.ausstage.edu.au/pages/event/109568), and it lists a bunch of high profile performers who wouldn't be expected to all be in the same cast. Boneymau (talk) 01:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Stage musical

message: +I have just seen an ep of Richard Scarry's, where Father Cat doesn not own a grocery store, as stated in the Wikipedia article, but runs a travel office (in the episode he helps his son, the Cat, to make a geography project for school using various items from his travel office (tralel pictures, folders etc). 
Did it change? 
Isyutaru (talk) 10:57, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busytown - Father Cat 

message: I no longer have my books but I remember a recurring character of Goldbug (at least that's what I called him) that was usually hidden somewhere on the page. I don't know anything about this character but think he deserves an entry on here
Jumbles1971 (talk) 22:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goldbug? 

message: I was watching CBS at 7am on 11/28/09 and reconized the characters, i guess this is a new show. Let's start a section.97.117.133.209 (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busytown Mysteries 

message: I think we should also list the detective characters (Couscous (I am not referring to the rice) etc.) because they have been frequent throughout the series.
trainfan01  —Preceding undated comment added 04:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing characters 

message: Smokey, Sparky, Squirty and Snozzle: a four of pig firefighters. Sparky wears a saucepan as his headgear, Snozzle wears a colander as his headgear, Squirty wears a tin hat with a gold cross on the front and a bow on the back as his headgear, Smokey wears a wears a tin hat with a round gold badge on the front and a brush on the top as his headgear, and one of them uses a trombone for a siren.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.25.216 (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And...? What's your point? Ckruschke (talk) 17:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  four firefighting pigs [NOT three] 

message: @Piotrus proposed this article for deletion with the following note:
*
This article is an overview of a series of books, games and TV shows that are in Richard Scarry's Busy Town (a.k.a. Busytown, a.k.a. Busy World, a.k.a. Busyworld) universe. You can find lots of articles about Richard Scarry that talk about this world as well as articles about individual books, games and shows. I did not find any that were just about "Busy Town". I am removing the deletion note anyway since an umbrella article for all these things. Note that there is also a template associated with this article, :Template:Busytown.
If this article is to be deleted, it should be discussed at AfD.
--A. B. (talk • contribs  •  global count) 02:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:A Coruña Airport

message: Formerly known? why? It's still known as La Coruña!!--83.37.52.102 (talk) 22:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The formerly known refers to the Alvedro airfield. And La Coruña is the Spanish name; the official name in Gallego is A Coruña. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû 22:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania

message: This name is obviously pronounced 'SKYLE-kill haven'.  That's what the reader can only deduce by your not following Wikipedia standards & stating the pronunciation.
Otherwise, a great writeup—which Wiki, unfairly in my opine, still classifies as a 'stub'.  Well, in this article's present state it's plenty more substantive than that.
Jimlue (talk) 05:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: A pronounced improvement?
Talk:Biomass gasification

message: I removed the section below, as it seems to be about a Biogas powerplant. These can be found all over the world, so I don't think this one is notable. Preslav 18:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I have merged all the information here into gasification, since there really wasn't that much here to begin with, and gasification gives a deeper exposition of the chemistry and applications. This page is now a redirect. --Jonathan Stray 12:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Meat loaf

message: I've edited this back, looking at the history this page has been swapped back and forth from Meat Loaf (singer) to Meatloaf (food). The food item is one word (meatloaf) the singer is two worrds (Meat Loaf) is someone enters Meat loaf in to wikipedia then chances are they are looking for the singer as apposed to the food item. 
please leave this page as it is from now on. Kejoxen 18:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider WP:SYSTEMATICBIAS in this case. People don't normally look up food as much as they do entertainment figures, but that doesn't meant that the latter are more important to society. Also, a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT that directs this page to meatloaf better fits the criteria found at Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Determining_a_primary_topic:
*  "Historical age", (meatloaf is way older) 
*"If a topic was the original " (singer is named after the food) 
*"Principal relevance only to certain people groups" (Meat Loaf the singer is only relevant to fans of his work).
* "If a topic has only ascended to widespread notability and prominence recently" 
--Prisencolin (talk) 03:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Why yes, meat loaf being the primary topic of meatloaf certainly satisfies the criteria that's under "we do not generally consider any one of the following criteria as a good indicator of primary topic". So... none of that is relevant. The above seems based on the idea that Meat Loaf is not the primary topic for his name, which is clearly not the consensus as your RM proved. The redirect should stay (and per WP:BRD, your change of a long-standing redirect is the one that should be discussed, not attempting to keep it as is). Nohomersryan (talk) 05:30, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I am aware that the other criteria listed for PRIMARYTOPIC are not to be given as much weight, but they should still be given consideration.--Prisencolin (talk) 23:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:Aer Rianta International

message: How about the joint venture with the Cyprus Trading cooperation
CTC-ARI ? 
The new Larnaca Airport has been developed in a joint venture between Aer Rianta International (ARI) and Cyprus Trading Corp.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polysophia (talk • contribs) 17:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Joint venture

message: Its Russian page is http://www.ari.ie/index.php?section=277 WhisperToMe (talk) 22:07, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian page
Talk:Aeroparque Jorge Newbery

message: Just found some ATC communications on YouTube that in Aeroparque, some guy interfered with ATC operations and issued fake clearances. Necessary to add here?
Where I found the relevant dialogue: is on YouTube, in one of VASAviation's videos (Wiki wont allow me to post the link here).
Also, I got another source here: https://www.thebubble.com/private-pilot-arrested-after-infiltrating-aeroparque-control-tower-frequency-and-talking-to-planes/TransportFan2014 (talk) 04:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this incident necessary here?