lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Silesian language

message: This source may be useful in supporting this article:  Ibadibam (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source 

message: There is no section of this article on phonology which is very important in terms of language 2A00:23C7:588B:CA01:5177:ECE8:8B83:1098 (talk) 00:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonology 

message: The source cited for putting Silesian within the Czech-Slovak group was Glottolog, which is a tertiary source like Wikipedia.
The sources cited by Glottolog itself do not seem to support the claim that it belongs to the Czech-Slovak bloc of West Slavic, but rather class it as a Lechitic variety, either as its own language (at the same rank as Polish and Kashubian) or subsumed within Polish.
I have removed the statement in the leading section of the article about Silesian being a Czech-Slovak variety, as it does not seem to be supported by valid sources. saɪm duʃan Talk|Contribs 09:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Saimdusan I will note that probably the thing referenced is a lect in the Czech republic also sometimes called Silesian - however the vast majority of the time people are referring to the variety spoken in Poland, which has very clear phonetic reflexes from this specific branch, in particular most people claim it comes from Old Polish or even Middle Polish (though more often Old Polish), and this is how it is handled on Wiktionary. Vininn126 (talk) 14:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Czechoslovak variety 

message: Silesian is a dialect of Polish, not a language. Aside from loanwords from German, it is practically a relic of Old Polish. FeldmarschallGneisenau (talk) 03:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request move to Silesian dialect
Talk:Heiden, Schwitzerland

message: Schwitzerland???  --KF 12:56, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Five hours later, the same question again, this time in some detail: What is "Schwitzerland"? A mistake (that's what I assume, but I'm not sure)? A joke? A neologism? A regional dialect I've never come across?  --KF 17:48, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: It must be a mistake - I'll move it. -- Sandman 18:58, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Communist Party of Poland

message: Art. 13.
Zakazane jest istnienie partii politycznych i innych organizacji odwołujących się w swoich programach do totalitarnych metod i praktyk działania nazizmu, faszyzmu i komunizmu, a także tych, których program lub działalność zakłada lub dopuszcza nienawiść rasową i narodowościową, stosowanie przemocy w celu zdobycia władzy lub wpływu na politykę państwa albo przewiduje utajnienie struktur lub członkostwa.
http://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konstytucja/1.htm
:This is an Article from the Polish Constitution. It says among others, that the parties are fobidden, that refer in their programms to "totalitarian practices of nazizm, facsizm or communism".
:So, possibly a non-totalitarian communist party is not forbidden. Pibwl 18:22, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communism forbidden in Poland 

message: This text is pro-Communist. Poland is the place of poverty and fights. Now we know what was the Communist alternative - bigger poverty and Gulag.
There are many writing errors, many links are missing. If you love the Communism, do your job correctly.
Xx236 12:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: Poor Soviet Union...Xx234 (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  '' the danger that Pilsudski posed to the Soviet Union''
Talk:Ripley's Believe It or Not! Odditorium

message: After more thought, I don't see why each gallery in a single museum deserves its own page.  There just isn't enough content.  Perhaps if someone wants to add content, it should be reverted back to the version with all the links.  In the meantime, I'm going to convert it to a bulleted list.  Rossami 18:45, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Software for calculating π

message: The word 'billion' should be explained according to Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#Number_names. Angela
Thanks, doing that now.  -- Pakaran 00:02, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should include pihex and backpi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Deathbob (talk • contribs) 18:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those two projects are described in computing pi. --Gesslein 01:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Projects 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Pi which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Dance move

message: well first of vall ya peps need to show the moves on site i wll never enter this
site again if you dont improve it.
: Huh? --NeuronExMachina 07:36, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I am not an expert on dances other than swing dances, but I believe that the preferred term used by professionals is "dance step", or perhaps "dance figure".  I am familiar with the terms used by Lindy Hoppers in the United States, where the term "dance move" has become common, but the more traditional dancers in that community (e.g. Frankie Manning, Ryan Francois) still use the term "dance step".  I would be interested in hearing from ballroom dancers and ballet dancers (and other forms).  I believe it is likely that this article should be moved.  --Michael Richters 01:51, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Visual flight (rules)

message: This article has some problems. The main one is that we already have a Visual Flight - airplanes (which should be Visual flight (airplanes)). However almost all of the stuff in here is relevant only to airplanes. Airships, helicopters, balloons and autogyros are all completely different. The author seems to be trying to make it relevant to gliders and hang-gliders too, but the differences between gliders and airplanes are small enough not to need a separate article (with the obvious exception of any discussion of engines).
Unless someone disagrees I would like to merge any inforation from here into Visual Flight - airplanes and then make this into a small article, noting the differences between the different kinds of aircraft and then referring to Visual flight - airplanes. DJ Clayworth 15:37, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Emperor Jimmu

message: I was mid-responding to your .
Here is the archived version since the link is dead. The website itself cites these 3 sources:
*a blog post from a Japanese language school
*a post on Medium (website) (effectively a blog)
*an article on TheFamousPeople.com
Not reliable. — MarkH21talk 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic Mysteries source
Talk:Silesian ethnolect

message: There are two concept about Silesian ethnolect:
 (1) separate Western Slavonic language (similar to Polish and Czech with some German influences) or just  (2) a regional dialect of Polish. As the linguists say there ae no strict definiton of what is a language, what is a dialect (both are called ethnolects). 
I am a native Polish speaker, and when my friends from Silesia speak, I don't understand anything except a few words, that are sililar to Polish. The same applies to Czech, Slovak, Russian, Ukrainian and Kashubian. Kashubian and Silesian are sometimes clasified as dialects of Polish. 
The Silesian people consired themselves to be a separate nation and their speak to be a separate language. And the Polish nationalists deny them this status. This is a political not lingusitic(scientific) debate. 
CC, 11:55, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silesian language should stay
Talk:1705

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:40, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:List of logicians

message: I borrowed all of the formatting here from List of mathematicians. I also preserved some of the enteries. Counting set theory as a part of mathematical logic I have kept set theoriticians on the list. 
I am sure that the list is woefully incomplete. I also have not gone around (yet) and placed links to the list.
I put this up because I had no where to put a link my recently created Leon Henkin. Perhaps it might not seem that a seperate list of logicians (over and above the mathematcians list) is needed. But 
# Some famous logicians aren't necessarily famous in the broader community of mathematicians (Henkin might well be an example), and 
# A good many famous logicians are philosophers, linguists and computer scientists rather than mathematicians. Saul Kripke for example.
vanden 03:18, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: I'm tempted to remove names of logicians who don't have pages of their own. This would be consistent with other people lists on Wikipedia. Anyone opposed? --Simoes 16:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Simoes 20:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't be consistent with all people lists on Wikipedia. (See list of philosophers and its subpages.)  However, since this list is pretty sparse and not especially well-sourced, it seems permissible. KSchutte 23:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of red names 

message: We could include more computer scientists contributing to the theoretical development of logic. I added Thierry Coquand, Gérard Huet, and Christine Paulin-Mohring, who have been working on type theory (which counts as logic).
Mpiedrav 17:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer scientists working in logic
Talk:Bachelor of Business Administration

message: Why is there an extra degree for Business Administration and not the common BS or BA?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.13.149.56 (talk) 12:22, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why an extra degree 

message: The list of highly-ranked schools is misleading.  I know for a fact that the University of Chicago does not offer an undergraduate degree in business.  Some of the other listed schools probably don't either; I don't have time right now to look it up.
The USNWR article is a ranking of schools for "economics and business".  Because business is not part of the liberal arts, many of the top schools do not offer degrees in business, marketing, or anything else that would fall under the umbrella of a BBA.  You can major in economics, though, which is why such schools are on the list.
Even if you can major in business at, say, Harvard, they aren't going to grant you a BBA.  It will be a BA, or more likely an AB, which is just the Latin version. 2603:B078:2000:930:54:2177:4109:E36E (talk) 00:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highest-Ranked Schools List is Misleading
Talk:Hollerith card

message: Hang on!  there's already an entry for punch card (and one for Hermann Hollerith, which also duplicates some of the information, but probably is needed).  But punch card and Hollerith card need to be merged, but I don't know how to do that.
seglea at 0532 UTC on 031105
:Everything from "Hollerith" and "Hollerith card" is now appended to punch card. Edit away! -- Someone else 05:48, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Pope John XX

message: There is some evidence that a pope John Anglicus existed and reigned as pope
between Leo IV (847 - 855, or 853) and Benedict III (855 - 858). Pope John 
the XX new about this and in honoring John Anglicus as a real elecated
pope he renamed himself to John XXI because John Anglicus should be named 
John VIII. John Anglicus is a very controversial figure because she used
also the name "Johanna von Ingelheim". It seems she came from the german city Ingelheim/Rhine River.It looks like she was the only female pope in the history of the holy church. If this pope ever existed she would have reigned
in the years between 853 and 855. -- User:203.144.143.250
The myth of Pope Joan has rather thoroughly been debunked. -- Someone else 08:30, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: "...based on the confusion of having twenty Pope Johns before them."  Should this not be Popes John?  Sahasrahla 00:47, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pope Johns v. Popes John 

message: For something relatively straightforward, could this be any more confusingly written? Maybe someone who knows what they're talking about could clean this up and make sense of this hash...  172.145.96.217 20:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole article was a mess, because the confusion about numbering Popes John actually had nothing to do with including or excluding antipopes, but was due to an error in the textual transmission of the Liber Pontificalis, clarified by Louis Duchesne in the preface to his critical edition of the LP and explained at some more length by Reginal Poole in EHR 128 (1917), pp. 447s. I have now replaced the text of this article with a new text. Yet as I am no native speaker of English, somebody should probably brush this up. If you want to contact me, you can find me here. --84.60.220.80 23:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow...
Talk:Roger Moore

message: The current page states Roger Moore was the son of George Alfred Moore, a policeman of Scottish descent. There is no reference to this, and Roger Moore made no reference to it in his memoir My Word Is My Bond. Further, his family tree on both sides is entirely English going back at least three generations. Where is the evidence that Roger Moore's family was Scottish? There should be a reference to it on this page, I think.
: You're exactly right. I investigated it and it turns out that an anonymous IP vandalised that about a year ago and no one noticed. This edit introduced that material without any discussion or citation. It seems that IP made other similar edits on a whole bunch of articles unfortunately. I've amended the article. Apples&Manzanas (talk) 08:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scottish Descent? 

message: In S01E09 of The Saint (The Effete Angler), there is talk about living in Monte Carlo and not paying income tax there.(188.79.46.114 (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Monte Carlo

message: Did he really divorce one spouse and marry another after his death?
The dates in the summary box would seem to imply this. Perhaps some thorough date checking might be warranted. 109.148.175.33 (talk) 05:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time Traveller? 

message: The first paragraph says he portrayed Bond 7 times but then goes on to say he portrayed Bond a record 8 times, "Moore's Eighth appearances as Bond, from Live and Let Die to A View to a Kill, are the most of any actor in the Eon-produced entries."
Am I missing something? There were only 7 appearances, right? Please clarify. Thanks. Mickey Smiths (talk) 15:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrayed Bond 7 or 8 times?
Talk:Index of biology articles

message: There's a discussion on what the reference requirements for lists like this one.  The Transhumanist (talk) 01:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Should there be an exception for indexes?]] 

message: i need help finding a topic  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.13.127.67 (talk) 19:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  topic 

message: I have requested an expert to look at this article. It contains several links to disambiguation pages that should be solved. An expert should know far quicker where to link to (or when to add additional links) then I do. Your effort will be much appreciated. Night of the Big Wind talk 16:39, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert needed

message: It uses Haifa to obtain  nutrients Bandile Mabaso (talk) 14:42, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do fungas obtain nutrients
Talk:Polish mine detector

message: See history for earlier talk. jni 15:17, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry - it is not yours arrogance. This link describes it much better . Have a nice day :D! Ares —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.221.131.71 (talk) 21:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Then it belongs to some article about RPG humour, not about military device. It's like inserting humour about Afroamericans in article about human races. Szopen 10:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an ethnic joke that has a lot of coverage in RSes that shares the same name.  Should the article at least mention it?
Hobit (talk) 13:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish mine detector joke?
Talk:Frederic Vester

message: Is this a typo? or is this common in German? -- Smerdis of Tlön 12:55, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't seem to be a typo. The first "Dr." is a doctorate; the second, Dr. hc. (for honoris causa) is an honour which you can receive from another university for your work. If someone has two "ordinary" doctorates, you write "DDr.", but in this case -- as the two cannot really be compared -- this does not seem feasible.  --KF 13:09, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense, thanks. -- Smerdis of Tlön 15:16, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Prof. Dr. Dr. hc. Frederic Vester 
Talk:Deus Ex (video game)

message: A lot of editors were changing the release date based on several articles that came out recently with the same's 20th anniversary. While some of these were going, paraphrasing "With the game's 20th anniversary today", and thus leading editors to use the date of the article's publication to set the game's release date to June 22 or 23 depending, we should not be using these sources, but instead the ones as close as possible to the game's actual release. In this case, the closest that names a date is the Gamasutra Postmortem, in December 2000, that names June 23 2000 as the release date. Unless one has a source that is closer to the actual release date and names it differently, we should not change it from that. --Masem (t) 16:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: While there are a lot of sources for this article, there is only a single review from PCGamesN. It doesn't seem like sufficient non-trivial coverage to merit a standalone article on the mod. The post release reception from the game would be limited to one journalist. It would likely be better to merge the information into the main article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I still don't agree with your interpretation of the extent of the topic's sourcing. But if no other editor, including the article's original creator, is willing to put in an effort to expand the article beyond the exceedingly bare bones stub we have right in front of us, merging it into the Deux Ex (video game) is a perfectly valid cleanup exercise. Haleth (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Deus Ex: Revision]] into [[Deus Ex (video game)#Mods]] 

message: In the development section, it mentions that 20 people worked on the game, while this mentions   50 people worked on the game. Which source should we use here? Timur9008 (talk) 13:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd probably trust the current source more. The newspaper one seems like it may have been an exaggeration for dramatic effect to show that games will take less risks as their development cost rises, while the one used in the article actually breaks down who was working on what. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the development staff
Talk:Transport in Iraq

message: It may be a good idea, if anybody knows, to include the simple-yet-obscure stuff like which side of the road the country drives on.-Penta 14:14, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: See road, external links. I agree, it would be good to add this info to Transportation in .. pages. - Patrick 20:29, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: Transport in Iraq#Railway links with adjacent countries It would be more useful to give the name of the lines, together with a link, instead of the end cities. Peter Horn User talk 18:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of lines
Talk:Corticotropin-releasing hormone

message: I am rather sure that "corticotrophin" is misspelt. -trop- = "directed at", -troph- = related to nourishment or growth. "Corticotropin" = ACTH = Adrenocorticotropic (not trophic) Hormone, as it's directed at the adernal cortex. Kosebamse 17:00, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been one of my bugaboos too. But actually, both -tropin and -trophin are correct (and in common usage), since the releasing hormones have both tropic and trophic effects (the latter referring to releasing hormones promoting the growth of their target anterior pituitary cells). However, I agree with you that -tropic is preferred; most assays for releasing hormones measure their tropic rather than trophic effects. That goes for the -trophs or -tropes of the anterior pituitary as well; for example, gonadotropes is preferred over gonadotrophs. --David Iberri (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To the main editors of this article:
At the end of the following scientific news it is claimed that "it is known that the stress-hormone CRF, its receptors and other peptides that modulate these receptors are found in human skin." Could anyone with some expertise in the field verify and add some text to the article if the assertion above is true? Many thanks.
Regrowing hair: UCLA-VA researchers may have accidentally discovered a solution
Pmronchi (talk) 13:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there any CRH found or produced in skin? 

message: This might be a good addition to the article, research from Dr. Mulugeta Million of UCLA: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Wellness/baldness-alopecia-reversed-mice/story?id=12932070 -Legaia (talk) 18:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, from Baldness, I found a better source: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0016377 -Legaia (talk) 19:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research linked to reversing alopecia 

message: See Exercise can slow onset of alzheimers and its link to the research article. - Rod57 (talk) 20:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRF may be link between exercise and less Alzheimers 

message: I have a PhD in botany, so I've had some chemistry.  But I struggled mightily to understand the positive and negative effects of CRH.  A single paragraph in lay terms would be most helpful, then y'all can glory in your denseness.
Don Bailey
jeep1104@gmail.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.127.89.155 (talk) 00:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dense
Talk:Adrenocorticotropic hormone

message: Same as with Corticotropin-releasing hormone, "corticotrophin" is probably misspelt, explanation see there. Kosebamse 17:03, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This seems to be a new development on this topic.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/754712
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/questcor-announces-conference-call-and-webcast-on-june-14-2012-to-review-commercialization-strategy-for-rheumatology-indications-for-acthar-2012-06-11
"to review the Company's commercialization strategy for H.P. Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) for the following rheumatology-related FDA-approved indications on the label for Acthar:
Collagen Diseases: "during an exacerbation or as maintenance therapy in selected cases of: systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic dermatomyositis (polymyositis)."
Rheumatic Disorders: "as adjunctive therapy for short-term administration (to tide the patient over an acute episode or exacerbation) in: Psoriatic arthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis, including juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (selected cases may require low-dose maintenance therapy), Ankylosing spondylitis." "
50.71.203.92 (talk) 15:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New FDA approvals for Acthar® Gel? 

message: I don't get it, why there is a POMC in infobox, when the article is about ACTH?? --Petr Flosman (talk) 21:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POMC? 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ATCH. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  œ™ 06:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ATCH" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]