lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pope Abraham of Alexandria

message: ===Pope Abraham of Alexandria → Abraham of Alexandria===
*Oppose. But leave redirect in place, of course. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Clerical names. Addition discussion at Talk:Pope Peter VII of Alexandria. –Hajor 14:04, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move 1

message: *Oppose. But leave redirect in place, of course. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Clerical names. Addition discussion at Talk:Pope Peter VII of Alexandria. –Hajor 14:04, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Pope Abraham of Alexandria]] &rarr; [[Abraham of Alexandria]]

message: :* Move.
::"As it states in the Wikipedia:Naming Conventions Saints go by their most common English name, minus the "Saint" unless they are only recognisable by its inclusion. Abraham the Syrian is his most recognizable name despite the fact he is the Patriarch of Alexandria.  Same rule would apply to Mark the Evangelist."
::That's what I said before and I'll stick to it. -Markio 15:32 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:*Still unsure. But liable to yield to the opinions of the Copts and experts. –Hajor 17:19, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose Almost all the others in the List of Coptic Popes seem to be "Pope Xxxx of Alexandria" --Henrygb 00:23, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Oppose Not necessary, leave him with the format "Pope Xxxx of Alexandria". Gryffindor 13:02, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Oppose. As per Henrygb. – Axman (☏) 04:39, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move 2

message: They're the same article from the same source, about the same person. Someone decide which should be a redirect. John Carter 21:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Merged to here, to match other ecclesial officials. -- Pastordavid 20:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Also fixed the "coptic Popes" template to direct here.  -- Pastordavid 20:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with [[Abraham the Syrian]] 

message: the section 'Patriarchate' had 'simony, or cheirothonia,' implying they are the same thing.  Cheirotonia is a word often used in English by Orthodox as meaning the Sacrament of Ordination (from the Greek word for that Mystery, Gk laying on a hand), whereas simony refers to (the sin of) buying or selling that ordination.  So I removed the word cheirothonia (assuming that it was a mispelling of cheirotonia) -- Richardson mcphillips1 (talk) 17:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  simony is not cheirothonia 

message: This article has been heavily biased with pro-Christian views, and various assertions that this 'miracle' is true (Without citing any scientific source for the same) not to mention that the article does not state that it is a legend, but rather once again asserts the 'divine' nature of this occurrence. I demand that Wikipedia's laws and regulations concerning neutrality and citations be applied to this article. If not, then please remove the uncited portions of the same.
188.70.107.200 (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavily biased
Talk:PokéPark

message: I was surprised at the state of this article, it being such a big part of Pokémon's history. I would be glad to help out with it, but is there a wikipedian who actually has been to the park? It would be great if we could get them to help out. --Superpika66 15:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shocker...
Category talk:Chinese cuisine

message: It seems like this category has a number of entries which dont exactly fit as a "cuisine" when they are actually raw materials. However, I also recognise some "raw materials" are also served as dishes in their own right under the same name. I feel this category should be for articles which are the names of dishes. ie, Fried Rice as opposed to Rice. Gingerbread as opposed to Ginger.
I removed Longan and Lychee...two obvious examples of raw materials which dont quality as a dish. Ginger, Bamboo, Winter melon, Gas bladder etc, are all potential candidates for removal. Not may "raw material" candidates may stay, such as Ginseng?--Huaiwei 08:10, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  — Pekinensis 17:42, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Raw materials vs Cuisine
Talk:Department of Cuzco

message: The spelling of Cusco/Cuzco is a real quandary at Cusco and just as perplexing here. Peru itself spells it with an "s", as the reference I just added shows. So this should probably be the same. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cusco or Cuzco? 
Talk:Rhine rift

message: Should it be "because an active fault has not been discovered southwest of the city"? Eixo 09:41, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: I am a little confused about the type (I presume of rift?) being 'Reverse thrust dip-slip'. Rifts are a result of crustal extension, so what does the reverse thrust bit refer to? Mikenorton (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverse faulting?

message: Support. In fact there is another article on the same subject at Upper Rhine which ought to be incorporated too. Strictly there is a distinction between the (Upper) Rhine Rift, which is the geological structure, and the Upper Rhine Plain, which is the geographical landscape on top of it. However that distinction can be brought out in the new merged article. If the merger grows too large, it can always be split out again, but perhaps more logically than the current 3 articles. For what it's worth, Upper Rhine Plain, Rhine Rift Valley and Rhine Rift are all authoritative English names (according to Dickinson or Elkins). I suggest we stick with Upper Rhine Plain as the overall title (since it embraces the others) and use Rhine Rift or Rift Valley as the sub-title of the geological section --Bermicourt (talk) 17:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:The Adventure of the Lion's Mane

message: I think that synopsis is a bit too long/detailed... let people read it for themselves; it's a short  story no?
---
Is the character called "Stackhurst", "Stackhouse", or "Stackworth"?  Or are these three different characters? -Mmaster 11:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ---The character's name is Stackhurst, and I've corrected the reference to Stackhouse. Jandar (talk) 03:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

text: ---This story was originally published in 1926, and is likely still under copyright protection in the United States (post-1923). Jandar (talk) 03:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

text: ---This could be argued either way, but in the Adventure of the Musgrave Ritual Watson records a conversation in which Holmes describes the case. In the other two stories Holmes himself is described as putting pen to paper and recording the cases. It's a small distinction, but this is why the Musgrave Ritual is often excluded from the list of Holmes-narrated stories Jandar (talk) 03:41, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The existence of a draft of this adventure with a co-protagonist called Dr Mordhouse is mentioned in https://books.google.ie/books?id=uWAiAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA1691&lpg=PA1691&dq=%22The+Lion%E2%80%99s+Mane%22+mordhouse&source=bl&ots=ViOQaQ1-Je&sig=ACfU3U2A1qw6gddpnAMM4tc7-7DA_YnBJw&hl=es&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi0sazm3MHvAhVITcAKHZrJDTUQ6AEwD3oECBEQAw#v=onepage&q=%22The%20Lion%E2%80%99s%20Mane%22%20mordhouse&f=false "The new annotated sherlock holmes" but without an analysis good enough for the wikipedia. It would be interesting to have some other sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.27.39.177 (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a second source and have added a few lines to the article about the original manuscript. Miles26 (talk) 21:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Dr Mordhouse?
Talk:GEOS (8-bit operating system)

message: The link to the GEOS website doesn't work. RocketMaster 11:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GEOS 

message: I was thinking perhaps Contiki could be good to mention/link to from this article. --46.9.227.200 (talk) 23:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And it seems mention of Wheels might also be in order here. --46.9.227.200 (talk) 11:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about a See also section?
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 13

message: I just took the pov tag off the page because I can't find any actual discussion about the POV status of the article on the talk page.  The only ongoing complaints I see are ncdave's, but as best I can tell his concern is not about npov bur rather that the article isn't written to match his point of view.  Obviously, there are always things that can be improved, but are there any currently running debates about the neutrality of this article that I am missing? Gmaxwell 22:27, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now, I am not a lawyer or doctor, but it seems to me that whether or not she can be fed in another manner is irrelevant.  The determination of the courts (however unfair it may seem) was that Ms. Schiavo would not want to live in her current state.  Currently the accepted practice in undisputed cases of PVS, seems to be the removal of life support, which in this case is considered to be the feeding tube.  Valid arguments against this would be that Schaivo is not in a PVS, or that dehydration is a painful way to die (I believe both of these points are covered in the article).  Whether or not she can be fed otherwise, though, is not terribly relevant.  Also, just as my personal opinion I think that choking could potentially be worse than dehydrating, since you could conceivably be fully aware and struggling in fear when choking, which does not sound fun at all.--CVaneg 00:42, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be irrelevant to the decision to kill Terri.  However, it is not irrelevant to the fact the lack of a feeding tube is not what killed Terri.  Lack of food and water through any means by court order  killed Terri.  Saying that Terri died because a tube was removed gives the uninformed reader the false impression that this was just another case of passive euthanasia - and what's the big deal with pulling the plug anyway?  Terri's death was active euthanasia, in a state that does not allow active euthanasia, on a patient that doesn't even meet the requirements (terminal illness) of the only state (Oregon) that does provide for active euthanasia. StuartGathman 17:36, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Any NPOV issues?

message: This article has been cited/linked to in a Reuters article, which will be syndicated on the English-speaking media around the world:
:The online community had followed the case closely, and Thursday responded swiftly with sites devoted to the legal battle posting updates from the family. The online encyclopedia Wikipedia, which allows any reader to create and amend entries, also immediately noted her death in its lengthy account of Schiavo's life and last days. ("Web pays respects to Terri Schiavo": )
--Neutralitytalk 02:16, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
::Drawing attention to a high traffic, contentious article on April Fool's Day, what could possibly go wrong? --CVaneg 03:00, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cited in Reuters (major wire service)!
Talk:Ripple

message: I am interested in the Ripple that figured prominantly in the TV series "Sanford & Son" as an alcoholic beverage.  Was it a brand name of an actual product (e.g. Thunderbird) or was it a satire of fortified wines in general and their typical consumers?  The website Bumwines seems to think it existed -- http://www.bumwine.com/others.html -- but has no real info.
Ripple wine was definately real!!! I grew up in the 70's and enjoyed many bottles of frutiflavored cheap RIPPLE wine. Ripple wine appeared in many of the shoulder bags carried into Rock Concerts of the day.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.129.120.161 (talk) 19:45, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's it called?  Ripple, lawd!  What's the deal?  Might not be real!
Talk:Affirmative action bake sale

message: Whether it is innovative or not is in itself controversial. POV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.42.102 (talk) 12:12, 7 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This topic does not merit a Wikipedia article. Issues of affirmative action are adequately covered elsewhere. The particular protests and stunts described in this article are not noteworthy enough to stand on their own as an article, and could be incorporated briefly in other articles. FatTrebla (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion?

message: At Regis University, a bake sale like this was shut down because it was a "crystal clear" violation of the law.
I came to wikipedia to find out it's actually illegal, because I have no idea. The article seems to be saying that because it's a non-profit protest, it's not racial or sexual discrimination, but I'm having difficulty imagining that being actually true. I'm sure you'd have a very difficult time finding someone willing to take a bake-seller to court, but it does seem like something that is technically illegal. Other articles don't bring up legal issues: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/06/bake-sale-to-highlight-gender-pay-gap-sparks-threats-of-violence or http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/23/jordan-high-school-gender-equality-bake-sale_n_6925692.html for example.Itsnotmyfault1 (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality in the US 
Talk:Prague Metro

message: Would anyone mind if this article were separated into two? On the one hand, because the information about most other metros around the world are arranged in double articles: a Main article and a List of stations (see List of metro systems). On the other hand, because the list of stations is actually a different type of information (i.e. which is not usually read from the first letter to the last) so it would be more fitting in a different article to the basic one which could be read through.
Adam78 12:19, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, IMO, done it :). Matt 13:30, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't the name be Prague metro or Metro in Prague? Prague metro system has no proper name. "Metro" is considered as a generic term here. --ŠJů (talk) 12:07, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: - During the floods 2002, the service was much more limited than described in the article. Trains Dejvická - Malostranská were not operating, for example.
- 8171 was operating on all lines, not only B. Where else would the reconstructed trains 8171M come from?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.176.120.129 (talk) 20:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes in the article 

message: Although Metro Lines A and C are clearly visible on the network map, Line B is very hard to see as the yellow line blends in with the light brown shades of the map. JIP | Talk 14:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metro Line B hard to see on network map
Talk:Anti-WEF protests in Switzerland, January 2003

message: it should maybe be noted that "holy cow" is a current metaphor in switzerland, refering to anything considered above criticism, without evoking Judaism. The Swiss Army, for example, was frequently called, and portrayed as, a "holy cow". dab (ᛏ) 12:19, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In English, too; c.f. Holy cow, or better yet, Sacred cow. Lupo 14:57, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: P.S.: And the sacred cow interpretation has to go in. I believe the symbolism of that cow is a mix between "golden calf" and "sacred cow". AFAIK, calves do not have horns, yet. :-) Lupo 07:35, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: Now It would be time to create a 2004 and 2005 page. And a actual page for the current protests (2006) that happen just right now. helohe (talk) 15:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual progress 
Talk:0wnz0red

message: From WP:RfD:
* 0wnz0red → A Place So Foreign and Eight More → nonsensical redirect.  Radiant_* 11:26, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
** Keep. Cory Doctorow really did write a story called "0wnz0red". Susvolans (pigs can fly) 11:50, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Samir Azzouz

message: This article does not have a single reference. 
To maintain the standards of Wikipedia, I welcome anyone to help reference this article with credible sources. 
Alternatively, the article could be put up for deletion.
Amin (Talk) 03:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of rerences 
Talk:Lajes Air Base

message: Having been stationed at Lages Field from 1981 until 1983, it is nice to see an article on this.
--TracyRenee 13:06, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *All the same air base.  Some one who knows whats going on should merge these.  Desertsky85451 16:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Representative Party of Ontario

message: Let's be clear about something: Wikipedia is not a platform to promote a poltical party. It aims to be an objective encyclopedia. Its articles must maintain a Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View (NPOV). I have edited this article to conform to Wikipedia policies and will continue to do so if anyone tries to turn this into a promotional vehicle for the party. By the way, if you're setting up a political party in Ontario, one of the first things you should learn is that there are 103 ridings, not 308. This will be increased to 106 for 2007. Thanks you. Kevintoronto 13:17, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is this still an article. In 2006, the party seemed like it could become something, but now it is an article about a party name that was reserved on the list and never actually used. Not good enough to merit an encyclopedia article. Ground Zero | t 21:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ida B. Wells

message: I see "Wells" as well as "Wells-Barnett" as the way that this person is referred to as. I believe it should be one or the other throughout the article. Also, I know all the needed redirects already exist around her name variation, but shouldn't the article title itself also carry the same as whatever is decided upon as the last name convention to use throughout? — Moops ⋠T⋡ 18:14, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the title should carry through the rest of the work. Much biographical and scholarly work refer to her as "Wells." It's especially confusing because of the name of the white grocer Barrett it "The lynching at The Curve in Memphis" section. I am going to change it.  Eliza HCF22 (talk) 01:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

text: The more frequently found name is Wells. The hyphenate form Wells-Barnett appears in fewer books, though it may be argued that these few are more scholarly. My take on the issue is that the simpler name is more common, answering WP:COMMONNAME quite nicely. Binksternet (talk) 01:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Eliza HCF22, what REALLY needs to happen here is that your professor makes themselves known to us and give you and your classmates guidance--and maybe gain some more experience in editing Wikipedia also. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wells or Wells-Barnett
Talk:Dōshu

message: Do we really need two pages saying the same thing? I would suggest a, that the title should be 'Doshu' because I have not come across two meanings for the word, and b, that the article is only very barely a stub as most of what could be added is to be found in the other aikido pages already.
Rednaxela 13:54, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While the naming of the second of third doshus absolutely refers to Morihei Ueshiba as the first doshu, I don't think he was ever called that. Moriteru wasn't second doshu while alive, he was just doshu. / Habj 05:25, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osensei a doshu? 

message: Its hard to find any other notable use of this title existing in English nor Japanese, so I propose changing this page to redirect to aikikai#Doshu for now. I acknowledge that in principle the title is not necessarily specific to aikido, but in practice it is . Cesiumfrog (talk) 04:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Sabiha Gökçen

message: The French pilot Marie Marvingt flew at least 1 bombing mission while Sabiha was 2.
You could possibly get away with first "fighter" pilot but not combat pilot.
You can look up the citation for her Croix de guerre. 86.179.74.162 (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First combat pilot?
Talk:House Tully

message: Arbor, I see you removed the link to the picture of the familytree house Tully and replaced it for a table, without the first Lord paramount of the riverlands and without Medgar Tully. Why?
:My idea was to keep a thumbnail to the image, along with the (navigable! hooray!) table-based tree. By all means put it back. (Otherwise I'll do that tomorrow. Should be easy to find in the history.) Arbor 16:15, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Repeater (album)

message: why are they considered a post hardcore band they helped evolve hradcore not take it beyond
Wouldn't it be kind of a good idea to merge this into the Repeater plus 3 Songs article that already exists?  Most album reissues don't have their own pages. SchnappM 04:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Washington (tree)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. Appropriate capitalisation. Andrewa (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Pope-elect Stephen

message: Should the word Pope be capitalized?  The article contained both usages when I got here. Jdavidb 15:39, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalize "pope"?

message: An anonymous editor added this sentence: 
:Pope John Paul II did not recognize Pope Stephen II as a past pope so many decided to follow him.
Since the article says that Stephen II was "delisted" by the Vatican in 1959, 20 years before JPII became pope, I've removed this. --Jfruh 17:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  JPII? 

message: Discussions about this article's title can be seen here : Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_%28names_and_titles%29#Numbering_popes_called_Stephen. Švitrigaila 17:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's title 

message: I've removed the Papal Infobox and the Papal succession box, from this article. Stephen (as the title clearly states), was never Pope. GoodDay 20:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Never a Pope

message: Ok, I know that we are not going to change objective reality here in an encyclopedia and the Church will do what the Church does but let us consider this in light of Peter.  We can not be sure of exactly moment in time Peter became what we think of as a bishop.  Was it when he was called, was it later when Jesus specifically sent him and the others out on the little mini missions that they went on or was it at the moment of giving the keys.  It may well have been at the last supper.  
It could be possible that Peter was the Pope, as in the non divine leader of all true Christians on the planet, and still have yet to be a bishop or even a priest in the sacramental sense.  I don´t know that to be true and would certainly like someone who knows more about this to inform me but from what I know it seems like it might be possible.  I suppose the real question would be if people were looking to Stephen as the leader yet or not.  We could also think of this as the Holy Spirit´s way of not giving us a bad Pope but to say that might be to seem very negative.  In any case the Church has spoken on the issue but I just would like to know what this means in the nature of the papacy.  
Long Live Pope Benedict XVI.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.47.44.217 (talk) 12:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Another view

message: As a specific title within the Roman Catholic Church, "Pope" is a proper noun. -The Mysterious El Willstro 71.181.144.209 (talk) 06:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalize the word "Pope"
Talk:John Davidson (poet)

message: The dates given are contradictory: Died March 23, 1909 // disappeared March 27, 1909.
:The "Missing" poster from the Penzance police says the 23rd. Mike Hayes (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death ??? 