Talk:The Fake Sound of Progress (song)

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
*Odd Support - I support the move, for consistency's sake: make thefakesoundofprogress point to The Fake Sound of Progress (album), and have both new redirects point to the album: don't make a disambig. No need to make a disambig for something this, when it's only one song by a group, and we can add a DAB header, and the song is in the track list of the album. That being said, definite strong suppport to end ambiguity. -Patstuarttalk|edits 01:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *Odd Support - I support the move, for consistency's sake: make thefakesoundofprogress point to The Fake Sound of Progress (album), and have both new redirects point to the album: don't make a disambig. No need to make a disambig for something this, when it's only one song by a group, and we can add a DAB header, and the song is in the track list of the album. That being said, definite strong suppport to end ambiguity. -Patstuarttalk|edits 01:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: #Oppose Unnecessary. All three of these are linked to from the Lostprophets template which appears on each page. Seems redundant to have a disambiguation page. GassyGuy 22:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Oppose votes

message: The Fake Sound of Progress (song) → The Fake Sound of Progress — Three works bear this name: the album, thefakesoundofprogress, the single, The Fake Sound of Progress and the demo, The Fake Sound of Progress. As the demo is of course less important, it should remain where it is. The archived debate says the album and song would get around the same number of searches, which is true, so why has The Fake Sound of Progress been made a redirect to the album? There is no need for the (song) suffix for the single article, as was agreed at the time the article was created. The disambiguation lines at the top of each article are suffcient, and do not assume which page the user wants. U-Mos 13:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since all the dablinks are in place, there seems no harm in making this change. This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 09:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Image:Lostprophets the fake sound of progress.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lostprophets the fake sound of progress.jpg