lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:GMC Brigadier

message: While Chevrolet is the better-selling GM division overall, in terms of large trucks (vehicles such as these), GMC vehicles outsold Chevrolet by a significant margin.  In addition, they were engineered and assembled in a GMC assembly facility.  It just makes better sense for this article to be GMC-centered rather than to be based on the a relatively rare version.  --SteveCof00 (talk) 08:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree wholeheartedly with that logic, plus the fact that the GMC versions handily outlasted the Chevrolet ones - probably for those very reasons. While the Chevrolet brand normally takes precedence for cars and light trucks, I think that for this (and similar trucks) the article title should reflect the far-more-common GMC name. --Sable232 (talk) 02:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to GMC Brigadier? 
Talk:GMC Astro

message: It makes more sense for this to be an article to be about the GMC Astro.  As the text of this page openly says, the GMC version is the predominant version.  --SteveCof00 (talk)  10:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page? 
Talk:Class 8

message: This article needs to be disambiguated to make room for a disambiguation page in line with the other Class X article. I propose moving the article to Class 8 (truck), but perhaps there are better names? For the record, Class 8 dismabiguates to (at least):
* 8 Metre (keelboat)
* British Rail Class 08
* BR Standard Class 8
* Class 8 (truck), a classification of trucks in the United States
* First Class 8
* GCR Class 8
* HAZMAT Class 8 Corrosive Substances
* L&YR Class 8
* NSB Class 8, a standard-gauge steam locomotive of Norway
* NSB Class VIII, a narrow-gauge steam locomotive of Norway
* NSB El 8, an electric locomotive of Norway
* NSB Di 8, a diesel locomotive of Norway
* TT Class 8, a tram of Trondheim, Norway
Arsenikk (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find any other Class X articles, the Truck classification article covers the actual definition of all the US truck classifications and the list of manufacturers is not overly exciting, so this article doesn't really add much to Wikipedia. I'd just delete this article all together and then use the name for the disambiguation page.  Stepho  (talk) 13:46, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move
Talk:Commer

message: Now that the Spacevan has a lot of content, and more than any other model in this article, I think it'd be reasonable to break it out into its own article. Any objections? – Kieran T (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea.   I'm not quite sure which of the various forward control delivery van Commers from the 60s and 70s (and 80s?) are to be considered as part of the Space Van line and which are not.   If someone - you? - starts the entry, maybe I'll find out.  Hope so....  Regards  Charles01 (talk) 15:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spacevan — article?

message: I found an amazing resource on the Commer TS3 engine, and I've added is a reference, but where is all the extra information on the trucks, and the radical design of the TS3 and the planned TS4?  Oh I know, "go and do it myself", but I'm not a subject expert.  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  And where are the trucks? 

message: No mention of the Commer KC yet. Pics here:
* grey
* blue
86.4.152.167 (talk) 20:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commer KC 
Talk:DAF NV

message: Am I correct in thinking, DAF NV was the holding company, with DAF Trucks and Leyland DAF the operational subsidaiaries in the Netherlands and UK?  Or were DAF NV and Leyland DAF both operating companies with a holding company above?
This article indicates DAF BV was the parent of Leyland DAF from 1987, and was renamed DAF NV when it was listed in 1989. Confession, I have no working knowledge of what the letters after Dutch companies mean, but this indicates much like Limited and Plc in the UK, they indicate a company's status. Barlalain (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holding or operating company
Talk:Mitsubishi Fuso Fighter

message: Price 105.160.93.96 (talk) 13:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price
Talk:Fuso (company)

message: Parts of the article mix past and present tenses and have other strange grammar. I don't have time to copyedit now but will return in a few days and do some fixes, if no-one else has sorted it out first. In the meantime I'll add a copyedit template. --Ef80 (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit 

message: A Press release dt. October, 19, 2020 by MFTBC still indicated the company's name to be MFTBC and not Fuso. -Wolle1303 (talk) 21:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  lemma
Talk:Dennis RS series

message: Good day,
I propose the merger of both the articles Dennis RS series and Dennis SS series to be merged into this article - as a result, I'd expect this article to be renamed to something such as Dennis RS/SS series.
Today I picked up the print edition of Andy Goundry's Dennis Buses and Other Vehicles, and reading through the section on the RS and SS to help with citing information, both the author and, most importantly, Hestair Dennis in their 1980 specification sheets, consider the RS and SS to be one appliance, with the only real distinction between the two being that the SS has a tilting cab.
As such, I feel a separate page on the SS is unnecessary, at it repeats the same information besides the specification of a tilting cab, hence the merger suggestion. The DS and DF series, though limited in citeable information online, have enough differences with the base models to warrant their own stub pages, in my opinion.
Please, feel free to discuss. Hullian111 (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Neoplan Jumbocruiser

message: What's the passenger capacity of this bus (exact or approximative)? --Henrickson User talk | Contribs 15:48, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Passenger capacity?

message: Some of these photos graphs show a 1'B+A and some show 1'A+B wheel (UIC classification of locomotive axle arrangements notation).  It would be useful if somebody knowledgeable could cover the difference.  —Sladen (talk) 10:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Mid-axle driven articulated buses are more commonplace before 1995s. After that, rear-axle driven models took over. All contemprorary articulated buses(Neoplan included) except for a single manufacturer have been using rear-engine design for two decades. 5.47.1.135 (talk) 11:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Wheel arrangement

message: How many of these buses were there?
Ambiguous language implies there was only one, but then other ambiguous language implies there were more than one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by N1n2n3n4 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many? 

message: I can't find any information on that. And the link doesn't work. Also this bus: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Hool_AGG300 has a higher capacity  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.87.34.55 (talk) 11:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  World record? 

message: . 39.43.48.180 (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the top speed for the napoleon jumbocruiser
Talk:Neoplan USA

message: All pictures were moved into a Commons link on the bottom of the page. Do not take offense. --AEMoreira042281 (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pics to Commons

message: In its last few months of operation, Neoplan had fallen on hard times, such as warranty issues with San Francisco's MUNI, and with the cash-flow problems after Boston MBTA canceled order over bus deliveries. [1]
The referenced link has expired. Is there another link available? 66.234.222.96 (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expired link 

message: The BusRide story referenced in the Neoplan article also seems to no longer be available. 66.234.222.96 (talk) 06:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BusRide Article on Neoplan's Closing 

message: Neoplan built 76 40 foot N416 buses in 1981-1982.
MARTA (Atlanta) got the first 50 in 1981 while
Milwaukee County Transit System received the last 26 in 1982.
Only 18 35 foot N416 buses were built and all for Milwaukee in 1982.
These buses were very unpopular by drivers and rolling stock during its time in Milwaukee. One was so badly burned in early 1984. Neoplan did rebuild it at their expense. EarlyBird89 (talk) 03:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  N416 Models
Talk:Nissan Atlas

message: 'Manufacturing began in 1981 at Commercial and 1982 at RV'. What does RV and Commercial mean in this context? Are they model names, trim names, manufacturing plant names, city names or something different? Thanks.  Stepho  talk  09:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: at RV and at Commercial

message: It would appear that the Nissan naming convention gets more convoluted, with the UD Condor (light duty) being similar the the H43 heavy duty Atlas... but completely different to the Condor (medium duty) - UD trucks website lineup page <B>Warren</B> (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ouf. I like what you have done to the page, a considerable improvement although obviously a lot remains to be done.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 17:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  UD Condor
Talk:UD Condor

message: Does anyone have any information regarding if the Diesel Condor was sold in Europe? I have trawled several truck forums and all kinds of sales sites and yet the only proof I have found of this truck ever being sold in any European country is this terrible quality photo I have taken myself in Norway. Barleria (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  European market.
Talk:FAP 1118

message: At  02:18, 24 June 2013‎ article was edited based on user Bobrayner thinking I quote"Old Mercedes engine, old Mercedes cab, made by a Mercedes licensee... VTI did a great job!"
In this article I have added designer, versions of vehicle and user with quantities. All with references. But that is not good enough because I quote again:"Old Mercedes engine, old Mercedes cab, made by a Mercedes licensee... VTI did a great job!"?
Here is changes I have made:
*designed by VTI - Military Technical Institute Belgradehttp://www.vti.mod.gov.rs/index.php?view=actuality&type=reference&category=4&id=130. FAP 1118 is in use by Serbian Army"Interview with colonel doctor Zeljko Rankovic in military autocross testing polygon Beranovac"  "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ggmy_LX-lE
*There is a few different variants of truck as it is used for several different upgrade(Sanijet NBC, LRSVM Morava etc) SAT - RTS1, March 2011
*  - 32"Interview with Minister of Defence of Serbian Armed Forces"  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-hU-nc67ag in 2011 more on order
All this changes are deleted by use Bobrayner without citing any fact just with his personal thoughts what is right and what is wrong?
Should on Wikipedia edits be personal biased, based on whether I like something or not and political motivated? Result of that way of thinking is subjective towards content without trying to understand it. Loesorion (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjective thinking in editing article
Talk:Pau de arara

message: His correct surname is "Bolsonaro", with three o's and only one 'a'. I'd change this myself, but it's a link which will either be activated or damaged if I try.84.243.236.9 (talk) 17:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jair Bolsanaro" 

message: I'm on the fence about whether this article should be split per WP:CONTENTSPLIT. The three main uses seem to share only a linguistic/analogy connection, which isn't a particularly strong tie.  talk 19:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split thoughts?
Talk:Ford Cargo

message: If you've followed the "discuss" link here to talk about the merger proposal, please note that the discussion is actually taking place at Talk:Ford Cargo (Europe)#Merger proposal. – Kieran T (talk) 14:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: This entry results from the misguided (say I...) merger in 2011 of two entries about two trucks that had little in common beyond the name.   They are or were both trucks and they are or were both made by Ford, but they are or were made in different continents and in different centuries.   Since 2011, beyond a large amount of tinkering round the edges, no one had liked to contribute significantly to the merged article.   I suspect that's at least partly because it's hard to know where to start trying to disentangle the strands.   How do people feel about a demerger?   (Subject, of course, to a suitable disambiguation page.)   
Failing that, I guess someone needs to take a deep breath and sort out the chronology.   It would be nice to find more sources before attempting that, but there's a bit of a shortage of usable sources on trucks unless (as I hope) someone reading this knows differently.  Regards Charles01 (talk) 11:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Demerger

message: At the top of the Ford Cargo page is stated: ″Missing technical information and information about North American version″
What does this mean? We just committed to purchase a "1986 CF7000" in the USA. So far as I can tell, they are all made in Brazil. This PDF is a scan of a Ford document. Pages 4 and 6 of the document would imply there is only one option for the location of manufacture. 
There is a tremendous amount of obsolete data available from browsing the files at https://www.dtnaecomponents.com/DTNAHardwareComponents/FordSterling/Ford/DataBooks/
Apologies if this edit is inappropriate; this is my first contribution to Wikipedia.
Krista Mae K (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is meant by "North American Version" ?
Talk:Ford Cargo (Europe)

message: I vote for merging this article with Ford Cargo  Bsharkey (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge please merge - Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 04:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I agree; the separation doesn't make much sense, especially while both articles are quite small. – Kieran T (talk) 14:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Support Merge. No need for two separate articles--ADtalk 12:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:GAZ-53

message: Please, do not list unimportant details, such as video games featuring this truck. That is not encyclopedic content and does not deserve a mention in the article. Eriba-Marduk (talk) 09:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Several edits were removed by User 46.31.31.123 (talk) Examples:
"The Gaz-53 design was copied without a license from the 1950 International Harvester L-Series|International Harvester L-180 truck."
"Information about the design having been copied was removed, but needs verification anyway:"
"The part about "copying" came from a blocked vandal who was adding blatantly false and ridiculous statements to numerous articles. It is not confirmed by any evidence whatsoever, and the trucks are completely different from each other"''
When User 46.31.31.123 removed the above edits, he disrupted the discussion thread, so I've restored it somewhat here just to maintain some continuity. Otherwise someone else might revive the discussion and we have to go through it all again. Santamoly (talk) 22:07, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:GAZelle

message: Ladies and gentlemen, I have an educated guess that GAZelles are similar to the later launched GAZ-2215/GAZ-2752 Sobol and GAZ-3310 Valdai line of vans and light trucks because  Sobol and Valdai in fact belong to that line as well, don't they?
As for the last sentence in the lead, I don't get what exactly was renamed the "GAZelle Business". Was that the whole GAZelle line, or just one of its models? Happy GAZelling, Ukrained2012 (talk) 03:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing lead
Talk:Chevrolet/GMC B series

message: I've hit a dead end as to what to do with the existing content without deleting too much.   I have settled on the general format, to bring it in line with other bus chassis pages (this article has far more information to work with, which is why I'm taking care to not change too much too fast.     
Things that need to be figured out:
*In order to get rid of any OR tags...is there any places to reference the content already here?
*There  is a Chevy equivalent...I just think it would be a good idea to figure out what its specific name is...in the long run, maybe this page can include both.
*As far as the engines go, I can't really figure out what was offered when...looking them up on here doesn't reveal too much.    Are there any being left out?   
Working on this could be the start of something good...
SteveCof00 (talk) 10:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-constructing the article 

message: I have rarley seen a Blue Bird CV200 being operated by one of the South Shore 
Regional Schoolboard‘s Bus Drivers but i wonder why? Slantz2011 10:36, 05 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I wonder why there are no Blue Bird CV200s being operated by the SSRB? 

message: Mostly based on Chevrolet and GMC brochures (*) and on Donald E. Meyer's First Century of GMC Truck History:
* No B-Series reference appears in GM documents until the 1979 model year. All previous buses were promoted as S-Series:
** from 1952 onward for the GMC models;
** from 1960 onward for the Chevrolet ones.
* The 1966 GMC S-Series buses were still based on the 1960-66 medium-duty C-Series;
* The 1967-69 GMC S-Series buses were based on the E-Series, i.e. the 1966-68 medium-duty trucks (92" BBC) which used the same cab and front face as the H/J-Series;
* The E-Series being replaced by the medium-duty C-Series (96" BBC) in 1969, the shool buses gained this new basis in 1970;
* As explained in Chevrolet's mid-1984 brochure, the new front end was introduced in January 1984.
English is not my mother tongue, so I hesitate modifying a whole page. I can try to rewrite it as draft/subpage of my user's page, but it will certainly need a lot of corrections...
(*) All concerned brochures can easily be found on Internet.BarnCas (talk) 01:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed Although the article linked in the post has been of great benefit towards advancing the content of this article (among others), there are still a few things that probably need to be cleared up from when this article was first written back in 2006.  For the most part, this article is only written about examples from 1966 onward.  
However, it looks like the corrections can made to the page gradually; no page moves needed. --SteveCof00 (talk) 11:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  S-Series until 1978, not B-Series
Talk:Robur (truck)

message: :Hi all,
:Just wondering whether there's any record of Robur bus being imported to Jakarta, Indonesia in 1962 as an athelete's transport for Emerging Countries olympics (GANEFO). Jakarta has 300 vehicles of it, and later become Jakarta's mini bus MetroMini. Serenity (talk) 20:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robur bus imported to Indonesia 1962
Talk:Guy Motors

message: The Tylor link appears to redirect / disambiguate incorrectly to a Victorian anthropologist, but I'm not sure where it ought to be going? Andy Dingley (talk) 18:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a "J Tylor & Sons Ltd" a manufacturer of petrol engines (and it seems to be the same Tylor family as the anthropologist).  However I have not been able to confirm whether "Tylor" in this article refers to that company. --Snigbrook (talk) 22:06, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Tylor engines are also mentioned in the Angus-Sanderson and Medium Mark A Whippet articles. --Snigbrook (talk) 22:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: :Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Guy badges Andy Dingley (talk) 19:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up for deletion at Commons
Talk:Hanomag

message: This section on Financial data does not make sense :-
" During the last fiscal year, the number of machines produced increased from 2500 to 3900. In the previous fiscal year, the turnover amounted to 356 million Euros, 62% over the year before. Komatsu Hanomag hired around 300 new employees during the last year; counting 268 temporary employees, around 1170 people were employed at Komatsu Hanomag at the end of last fiscal year. This is twice as many as at the end of the business year 2005, when around 650 people were employed here. "
This A) reads as if lifted from a company report (not cited) - probably Copyvio with bits like "last fiscal year" and B) It is unclear as to periods referred to as no clear base date given, other than the twice as ........year 2005 bit thus its several years old now.
So if some one wants to make sense of it so it has structure and references to be of encyclopedic value and not an abstract addition (corporate PR ?) feel free to add it back after sourcing and rewriting it.
- BulldozerD11 (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Financial data - (PR / Copy vio ?) 

message: i suggest to move the colour photos into a picture gallery. the way the photos are positioned now they clutter the right hand side of even big screens. M@ximili@n 21:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture gallery
Talk:Scania OmniCity

message: "Unlike both the L94 and OmniLink models from Scania, the OmniCity features a full low floor without the need to use steps or ramps in order to reach the rear seats, similar to the Volvo B7L."
OK, so in the photo,   the back three rows of seats are about 300 mm higher than all the other seats.   How are passengers going to climb up onto these seats if the floor is low ?Eregli bob (talk) 14:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to sit in this bus ?
Talk:Holden Crewman

message: That was a shocker. The Crewman is a separate entity to the Ute and as such requires its own page. 'Holden Ute' refers to a specific model made by Holden, rather than all ute-type vehicles made by Holden. You have the Ute, the Crewman, the 1 Tonne, and the Rodeo. These are all separate models, and all utes (note the small 'u'). They each have their own page. I've got to be honest, if you were an IP editor, I would have simply assumed vandalism. I really don't understand why that redirect was created, however, if you think it should be reinstated feel free to discuss your reasons on this page, prior to making that edit. Tinkstar1985 09:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Crewman is essentially a four-door version of the Ute, so it really does not warrant a separate article. This just creates unnecessary content duplication. Since the only major difference between the Ute and the Crewman is the extended cabin why create two article about the same thing? Information regarding the One Tonner is also mentioned in the Ute article, as it is merely a Ute with a alloy cargo bed, and since the Rodeo has no relation to the Commodore architecture, it has a separate article: Isuzu D-Max. OSX (talk • contributions) 10:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well then I propose a compromise. The Crewman needs more prominence in the Ute article. At the minute (within the Ute article) it appears to be as insignificant as whether or not a Ute is an S, or an SS - however the differences between the Ute and the Crewman are more dramatic, aside from it having a longer wheelbase, shorter tray, and seating for 3 more people, it also comes in a 4WD model - which the Ute does not. I think it needs it's own subsection/subheading. This is the compromise I'm suggesting, however I still do not feel entirely right about the deletion of the Crewman page simply because there are many other instances of this same "content duplication". See Citroën C1 , Peugeot 107 , and Toyota Aygo ; or Hyundai i30 and Kia cee'd.  Tinkstar1985 06:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The contents from this article have now been merged. OSX (talk • contributions) 05:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holden Ute redirect