Talk:Master of Philosophy

message: I don't think the description of an MPhil as 'a lesser degree' at the beginning of the article is particularly positive, especially given its prominent position and the use made of Wikipedia articles on many other sites. Personally, I think the article would read better with that sentence removed. Clearly, a PhD requires more, but having looked at Wiki articles describing other academic qualifications, there don't seem to be any similar connotations, such as describing a Postgraduate Diploma as a lesser qualification than a taught Master's degree, which, proportionately at least, is a fair comparison. Although varying between institutions (as do many other qualifications) the mainstream MPhil (in the UK that is) requires a thesis of about 50,000 to 60,000 words defended by a viva, and so its description later in the article as a mini PhD seems more appropriate. I would imagine that anyone who had succesfully completed one would feel justifiably proud of their achievement. Andrewiki (talk) 15:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A lesser degree? 

message: The article states the MPhil degree (which one typically associates with the UK) is also awarded now in th US. However, I´m not aware of any university in the United States that actually offers the MPhil degree. Regular academic master´s degrees in the US are usually designated M.A. or M.S. Alternatively, there are also various terminal, professional master's degrees such as the M.Eng., the M.B.A., the M.F.A., etc..., but
no MPhil. Could anyone provide a reference to back the article's claim ? 200.177.2.80 23:53, 24 December 2008 (NTC)
:Columbia University offers the M.Phil.  (If you Google "M.Phil" this Columbia page is currently second from the top). 98.116.188.7 (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting - thanks for this.  The Columbia MPhil seems to be awarded for successful completion of the taught component of the PhD programme, and would probably correspond more closely to a British taught MA or MSc, rather than the research MPhil. -- Nicholas Jackson (talk) 16:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Having received one in 1976 in Psychology it is awarded upon completion of course work and comprehensive examination.  It is correctly an ABD.Arodb (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

text: It was availible at Rutgers, "offered by the faculties of certain Ph.D. programs to students who achieve records of distinction during the predissertation phase of those programs". Students who left the Physics department without a Ph.D. generally got a M.S., but (though it was availible) I never heard of anyone getting a M.Phil. Bennetto (talk) 17:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: MPhil in the United States

message: :some professors, most notably the world-renowned philosopher Richard Swinburne, have held major professorships without ever finishing a doctorate.
Why is Swinburne the most notable example of this phenomenon? There are loads of top academics who don't have doctorates, including many who are at least as "world-renowned" as Swinburne.--Oxonian2006 (talk) 21:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Richard Swinburne? 

message: :Traditionally, the M.Phil. qualified a person to teach at Oxford
Really? I thought that traditionally the MA qualified a person to teach at Oxford. True, increasingly graduates took the old research degrees of BPhil, BLitt, and BSc (later renamed MPhil, MLitt, and MSc, in order to fit in with the modern universities and foreign degree systems), but I've never heard that the MPhil specifically was considered the basic teaching qualification.--Oxonian2006 (talk) 21:25, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds unlikely to me - especially since the MPhil is of relatively recent origin (mid-late 20th century).  It's certainly true that the MA originally licensed (and in mediaeval times, obliged) one to teach in the University, so possibly this is what the original editor had in mind.  In the continuing absence of any justification or sources for either this statement or the Swinburne remark, I've deleted both of them.  -- Nicholas Jackson (talk) 16:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teaching qualification? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Master of Philosophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090726114420/http://www.aanstaande-studenten.leidenuniv.nl:80/masteropleidingen/masteropleidingen/mphil-graad-niet-meer-verleend.html to http://www.aanstaande-studenten.leidenuniv.nl/masteropleidingen/masteropleidingen/mphil-graad-niet-meer-verleend.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Master of Philosophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512035858/http://www.nvao.net/veelgestelde-vragen/nederland/112 to http://www.nvao.net/veelgestelde-vragen/nederland/112
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Master of Philosophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100110215717/http://www.studyinnorway.no/sn/Masters-course-search to http://www.studyinnorway.no/sn/Masters-course-search
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205051146/http://denning.law.ox.ac.uk/postgraduate/research.shtml to http://denning.law.ox.ac.uk/postgraduate/research.shtml
*Added  tag to http://www.ucl.ac.uk/silva/registry/acd_regs/ac_reg_pdf_docs/section2_2010
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: This article currently uses a mixture of British and American spellings, the most obvious being 'enrol[l]ment' and 'program[me]'.  While it doesn't rise to the level of 'strong ties' that would require a particular English variety per MOS:TIES, the degree does seem to be mostly awarded in the UK and other Commonwealth countries, with only a few US universities granting it. I would therefore lean towards adopting British English spelling across the article per MOS:CONSISTENT. 
The original stub article used just British English but by the time it was a post-stub article both British and American spellings were established, so the guidance at MOS:ENGVAR to "use the variety found in the first post-stub revision that introduced an identifiable variety" isn't particularly helpful. This is also supposed to be a back-stop for when "discussion does not resolve the issue", so hopefully we can avoid it by coming to a consensus.
What do other editors think of adopting British English as the national variety for this article? Robminchin (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language variety