lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sure Start

message: Is "transmogrified" a suitably encycopidic choice of words?  It seems excessive to me.  --81.107.202.80 15:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now (a) logged in and (b) changed it anyway.  I've aimed for greater readability and have reduced redundant words in places.  While I was at it I also added a quote and some more references and corrected a foolish error that I had made some time ago. --Lord Matt 15:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of words? 

message: This needs serious re-writing. There has been no Dept for Children etc for 10 months. The page need some figures for funding before/during/after so-called cuts.
Not up to wikipedia standards (IMO)
Cannonmc (talk) 14:34, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  So out-of-date
Talk:Lackawanna Coal Mine Tour

message: Hello, I saw a video from what seemed to be an official Lackawanna County Youtube, and the spokesperson here says that the mine opened in 1860. The video link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o74ovhdxwnw 2601:98A:B7E:32D0:28BC:6BFE:AEBE:7219 (talk) 00:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Opening
Category talk:Oil fields of England

message: England has several small oil and gas fields, including Kimmeridge and Wytch Farm in Dorset, Humbly Grove and Singleton  in West Sussex and Eakring in Nottinghamshire. All are interesting geologically and historically and a Wikipedia article on each field or group of fields would be of interest. I trained as a geologist but I'm 20+ years out of touch with the subject and wouldn't know where to look for information. Any other contributor fancy writing about England's little onshore oilfields? Motacilla (talk) 12:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Exploratory engineering

message: I think that:
* The examples that are currently given under the "See also" section are way too general and broad.
* The examples on the related category page  are not fully representative of exploratory engineering (EE). They are all high level predictions which draw from many EE results and other assumptions.
Exploratory engineering can be much more focused and fundamental and with that more reliable. 
I think a good example would be e.g. the paper "A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis"http://www.molecularassembler.com/Papers/MinToolset.pdf
The prototypical form of EE is the work done in "Nanosystems" https://web.archive.org/web/20191008162657/http://e-drexler.com/d/06/00/Nanosystems/toc.html http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/nanosystems.html. 
A work for which the term exploratory engineering as far as I understand was invented.
The contents of this work are much more fundamental than the current examples on wikipedia.
(error rates, friction levels, power densities, ...)
Login Mechadense (talk) 15:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low level examples of exploratory engineering are missing
Talk:Faction

message: faction: example: civil war  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.230.55.78 (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I hate factions, we need games that won't seem like we are learning, but we are. I'm saying this as a sugustion as a 11 year old kid.I think learning should be more fun and not seem boring. I think kids should have fun learning fractions. I hope everyone has a great day.
...Faction represented in a degreed sentence: Finding A Collective Tallent In Other Notions. In this course a faction may be represented through whom ever is associated with the occurrence of termination. Termination is a great example that in ones own "office" Ownership First Finds It's Capabilities Experienced. In a Society and also amongst others, reference being is one's own society must start before another junction mingles with it, so as a society becomes a performance amongst -example>many< an office of an office protects the course, source, dependent, or independent, much more may exsist forgoing procedure. This is an acceptance of an economy though, perhaps starting with an Art which leads to an economic carrying on to its history.
For instence Law is a representation of 'Leadership_ which we all have at any particular time, 'And_ meaning another part, then a 'Wisdom_ again as a beginning; representing a continued allowance--other terms apply. 
In participation to a talent these mentions may apply. The start through speech of an acquaintance, perhaps Hello and then after an Agreement<may be searched for meaning to do part of, there is now, perhaps Thank You. A sentenced volley for Thank You could be/ To-Help-Another-Needed-Keeper You-Ought-To-Understand. The issues one carries through time are of certain "stabilities and or even stability whom ever has what to offer. For instance a Native to a land in course of being the Head representative of its populous, has now representatives, this term evenly is distributed through understanding of whom ever. Although there is a Head representative at any time anyone could invite a collective. Certain people have a capability to effort towards others, such a one with a decision of a Head Positioning ability which offers a new that will last on to again then add to or face another new, or to add to it would appear as a newer presence. The sentence and another's courses through the terming Faction and the Definition of a Faction that is of through the overall distributed thought is the or a representation to theories in sort would be of a sensible venture.
 Till Next Time 12:41 A.M. E.S.T. 9-14-2010David George DeLancey (talk) 04:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact to the factions.
Talk:World debt

message: Is the redirection to Debt levels and flows appropriate? I think we should have a separate article on world debt. Bolarno (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect or separate page? 
Talk:Sarah Morgan Bryan Piatt

message: User:SMBPiatt2020 (conflict of interest?) has added very non neutral content including "prolific and popular poet ", "was praised by prominent literary figures", "broke into the literary scene ", "George D. Prentice, the famous editor". Theroadislong (talk) 20:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: User:SMBPiatt2020’s  edits have extended the lead section enormously, and included early life details for example, that really don’t belong there. The article is now looking strangely bloated. Their user name gives cause for some concern over a  conflict of interest perhaps? Theroadislong (talk) 22:38, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non neutral content added by [[User:SMBPiatt2020]]
Talk:Move α

message: I think this article should be a paragraph in the article Syntactic movement. The two articles practically talk about the same thing. This article presents a certain theory to explain a syntactic movement. It one of the main theories in this subject and a basic theory in Generative Linguistics, and yet its description here is not very long, and shouldn't become too long in the future, I don't see why a person should skip between the two articles in order to get the whole picture. DrorK (talk) 12:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. The topic of the article is a vital part of REST, thus it deserves its own article and specialized literature section. Since noone has discussed the issue besides the original proposer during the last six months, I've removed the merge-tag. Omnipaedista (talk) 10:26, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Whittingham, Lancashire

message: I have rewritten a good deal of this article since:
*a. there is no actual village called Whittingham, although it gives its name to the civil parish which includes Goosnargh. (see the Lancashire Parish Portal website) 
*b. the history of the hospital was quite clearly set down in the the first of the references, so much of the text was incorrect here.
*c. the railway had a purpose - again mentioned in the reference
*d. the first of the refs led nowhere to do with Whittingham; two others had little to do with the article, since the first one was never mentioned; and the second was only connected with people having the name of Whittingham.
Finally, to say that the village is "in the city of Preston" is a little odd. The city boundaries include a good deal of open space, and it is IMO better to say "within the city area of Preston". Hope that isn't too pedantic!
Peter Shearan 15:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tallis Festival

message: One of the notable criteria as defined on Wikipedia is "Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network."
The Tallis Festival was given 50 minutes coverage and was the main feature on BBC Radio 3's The Choir on 28 October 2007.  It was referred to by the host of the programme as having already become an "autumn institution" and it was noted in particular for its contribution of new 40-part works for choir.
The host choir has also had other national radio and TV network coverage - see Talk: Exmoor Singers of London Chamber Choir
Exmoor Singers 15:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonderful! I'll remove the tag. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 17:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:WBVP

message: The risk of combining two simulcasting stations with, until relatively recently, largely separate histories into one article is that simulcasts don't always last forever and can be split. Since this has happened with WMBA, an article split is needed. (This may, if not will, require additional sourcing, though.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a split is clearly needed now. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 13:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split of WMBA needed
Talk:President Biden Expressway

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure)  FOARP (talk) 10:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This renaming is illegal.  Renaming of highways must be approved by state legislatures or Congress, not a city Council.  This happened because a renegade Governor, Wolf, permitted PADOT to illegally errct signs to recognize a sleezebag. 24.55.146.25 (talk) 00:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

text: President Biden Expressway →  – WP:COMMONNAME. Pretty sure no one in Scranton calls the road "President Biden Expressway". LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose - People in Scranton could simply call it "The Expressway", obviously that wouldn't work. It's best to keep the title where it is. Estar8806 (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 March 2023
Talk:Robert E. Holthus

message: Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#"winningest" in sports articles. Until consensus is reached, articles should be reverted to the previous stable version, per the policy WP:NOCONSENSUS: "In discussions of proposals to add, modify or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit." —Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Winningest in sports articles under discussion
Talk:ManTech International

message: When i originally wrote this article i could not find  lot of information on the subject. Any help you be greatly appreciated. Czsargo 16:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Might not be notable enough for its own article, but could be worth a mention on the "parent" company's article. Adam9007 (talk) 21:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[ManTech Commercial Services]] 

message: It is a press release, pure and simple. Nothing but a list of contracts and buzzwords.
Who is this company? How do we have a defense contractor without a 'controversies' section? 2607:FB91:1484:CDF1:4959:7D56:AB66:3EAA (talk) 18:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is obviously room on this page for improvement. Improve the page if you are unhappy with the POV, or if there are documented controversies associated with the company. It's a publicly traded company so all the information with respect to financials, board of directors, executives, etc., are available online if you aren't sure 'who' the company is or what it does. Bartzyx (talk) 23:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is pretty obviously marketing copy for investors
Talk:Barbadoes Island (Pennsylvania)

message: I believe PECO/Excelon also wanted to remove the Norristown Dam when they took out the power station as they only kept it to support the power station and didn't want the further liability of the dam.  However the community wanted to keep the dam.  Not sure how this was resolved, but certainly seems worth mentioning in this article if proper sources can be found.  --J Clear (talk) 13:11, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norristown Dam
Talk:Buckwha Creek

message: From which language does this name come? Badagnani (talk) 17:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Buffalo Creek (West Branch Susquehanna River tributary)

message: I have reinforced my correction as to the etymology of this Buffalo Creek- indeed, as of other Buffalo Creeks. with references to Mark Catesby's well-known published plate (1747) and the Wikipedia page List of mammals of West Virginia, which has a paragraph of these bison. My edit was reverted by an editor unaware (as was his cited source) of the extinct subspecies Bison bison pennsylvanicus, the Eastern Wood Bison.--Wetman (talk) 18:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bison of Buffalo Creek 
Talk:Codorus Creek

message: From which language does this name come? Badagnani (talk) 17:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this website  it is an unknown language, likely means at the place of the rapid water (isn't that Conewango?)- sorry. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 18:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Jan Tomasz Zamoyski

message: Poprawnie jest "z Sapiehów", nie "z Sapieh"!
Od autorów piszących na takie tematy powinno się oczekiwać znajomości odmiany nazwisk polskich. 
Poprawiłem  w artykule. 
--Jidu Boite (talk) 09:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odmiana nazwisk
Talk:List of programs previously broadcast by GMA Network

message: It was aired from 1969-1972 then 1974-1989.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.9.65.116 (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manila Hour 

message: As I was reading the list of programs in this list, a lot of the programs in here are inaccurate. Some are somewhat correct but the year is incorrect or the titles are misspelled, and the most obvious being that some programs never did air on GMA or in any of its regional affiliate.
Just to advice users not to rely on this listing. I will try to clean up some of them but I cannot be 100% accurate. The listing I had in the office (defunc TV guide) are not also accurate but can be reliable since we do verify them on a monthly basis. 112.201.254.9 (talk) 13:58, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning: Incorrect Information 

message: Would someone mind going through and downcasing? It's quite a large job. Tony (talk) 15:21, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section titles in sentence case ... 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved (technical move requested at WP:RMT) (non-admin closure)  Lennart97 (talk) 13:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: List of programs aired by GMA Network →  – Right now, the current programs are at List of programs broadcast by GMA Network and defunct programs are at List of programs aired by GMA Network, which is confusing. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 May 2021 

message: what are the timestots available for GMA drama 143.44.132.25 (talk) 13:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  media
Talk:Foxcroft Academy

message: On June 12 I placed a tag re: copyright violations. Much of the content came verbatim from the school's web site; besides copyright issues, it read as promotional. The current profile is cut back to encyclopedic essentials. If something vital has been accidentally deleted, please restore...judiciously. JNW (talk) 02:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A good portion of this text was restored, and I have reverted it again. A Google search of key words shows that almost all of it was cut and pasted directly from three sources: the school's web site, and those of Peterson's Guide and Boarding Schools USA. This is a copyright infringement, and is treated as vandalism. JNW (talk) 23:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversions of copied text

message: The article is inadequate.
At the expense of being obvious, when you write an article about a substantive entity, you begin it with a definition of that entity.  You say, "X is an academy in Maine." or "X was an academy in Maine that existed from 1823 to 18xx."
Instead, the first sentence states when the institution was founded.  That tells me it is defunct.
Define and describe first (if only briefly, as a placeholder, just to get the article going); then you may provide history.
And while we're at it, rewrite this article in English.
As early as the third sentence, readers -- who God forbid may include prospective students -- cheerfully read:  "Today, Foxcroft Academy serve as a private ...."
There's a best-seller on the market right now, and it's called Idiot America.
--Jim Luedke Jimlue (talk) 19:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this an extant instutition?
Talk:Robert J. Goldstein

message: Is it certain that he home-made C4? I was under the impression that it was quite complex. -Toptomcat 16:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Elwyn (company)

message: This organization was created by a eugenisist and should be rightfully marked as such. This article intentionally ignores the depth and bredth of this organizations involvement in the systematic destruction of lineages of POC, the disabled,  and immigrants and was a critical tool in the popularization of eugenics and cultural 'Clensing' of non-white,  lower class, disabled, or ethnically "othered" immigrants that would be coincided white in modern times. 2603:6011:F841:9735:31FC:942F:5D8E:7E22 (talk) 09:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  eugenisist organization at its core
Talk:Harveys Creek

message: Why is this considered notable?  See WP:Notability  It's a tiny creek in rural PA, and the article covers everything about it in massive detail. 98.249.198.22 (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacking in notability 
Talk:Hereford, Pennsylvania

message: The article in the link provided with the Hereford post office closure says that the owner is offering the property to Burger King, which currently has no locations in the Upper Perkiomen Valley area. Heff01 (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post office closure
Talk:The Hershey Story

message: The picture is for the old museum, not the new location  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.231.22.201 (talk) 18:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: This shouldn't redirect, there should be a separate page for the old museum.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.97.81.75 (talk) 23:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Hershey Museum Redirect
Talk:Home, Pennsylvania

message: This article gives two contradictory origins for the name of this town. (One stating that it was because its first post office was located in the "home" of postmaster Hugh Cannon in 1834; the other that "Harry Burkett started the post office...  in 1918... thats [sic] when the name changed from Kellysburg to Home." One is cited, but it's an off-line source. The other has no source information. Some clarification would be helpful. — AlekJDS talk 23:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name 

message: Perhaps there is some connection between the prominent, landed family named "Home" of the Scottish border country and lower highlands.  I know from old family oral history that this area was settled by Scottish immigrants from the same area around the mid to late 1700's, and by the early 1800's was a wool processing and sheep raising center.  In fact there was a mill there that sold wool for uniforms during the American Civil War. Perhaps the area was named for the Home family much as Pennsylvania was named for William Penn.  I do not know this to be true, but I would hazard an educated guess that they might have been loyalists during the American Revolution, and thus there might have been an attempt to change the name and/or obscure its origins.  Certainly this is not without precedent.
Meaculpaettu (talk) 12:21, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: re: Origin of Name
Talk:Team orders

message: Should the first letter of orders be capitalised? In the article title it is; in the article itself, some instances begin with a capital, others don't. Lkjhgfdsa 0 (talk) 18:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalised

message: Does this occur in other motorsport besides F1?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.13.2 (talk) 00:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Motorsport