Talk:Victory in Europe Day

message: I Wonder if VE and VJ Day are the same — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.9.85.227  (talk • contribs) 18:22, 10 March 2004
::No, they are not the same, see the articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tothebarricades.tk  (talk • contribs) 19:19, 3 May 2005
Thank you USA and others for our freedom against the Germans. Thank you very much wiki (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do we need the Declaration of Military Surrender? Relevant, but would be better linked to as an external source of in wikisource.--Tothebarricades.tk 19:19, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
: I agree it is exactly what wikisource is for and should be moved. Though maybe  an important point or two could be incorporated into the article. say1988  — Preceding undated comment added 01:26, 8 May 2005‎
Agreed, move it to wikisource - but don't just delete it! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 14:06, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To be moved to wikisource

message: I've just removed this:
:"May 8 is somewhat of a holiday for antifascists in Europe, especially Germany."
Aside from its odd coding, it's not clear what it means (what's "somewhat of a holiday"?), nor whether it's true (or, indeed, what being true would consist in). Could anyone help? --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 09:42, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentence removed from article

message: * Victory address by Sir Winston Churchill, 1945-05-08, 3 PM (Danish site, English audio, Real Player)
* Victory address by King George VI, 1945-05-08, 9 PM (Danish site, English audio, Real Player)
BsL (talk) 14:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed dead links

message: I think that this article requires cleanup because I noticed several grammatical errors. I fixed one but I'm leaving right now, I'll try and fix more when I'm back but in the meantime it would be nice if someone else could do it. Also I don't know how to mark it as cleanup needed or else I would.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.240.160 (talk) 23:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I see no reason for removal of "Celebration" and "Soviet Victory day" sections: the article's name is "Victory in Europe day", not "Victory in Europe (May 8) day". Reverted.--Paul Siebert (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disagree with resent text removal

message: Why does this article have a link to western betrayal? W. B. Wilson (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Link removed as the western betrayal article itself was deleted on 18 March. W. B. Wilson (talk) 08:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd linkage

message: May 8th is not a public holiday in Norway. Maybe it has been on some specific occasions, but the information here is not generally correct. Should I remove it?  I think that a similar comment can be made about some of the other countries listed too. In fact, this section is quite ambiguous and muddled. Quantum.wells (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: May 8th as a public holiday

message: This article is about Victory in Europe, for Europe, why is there a paragraph about the celebrations in The United States? Shouldn't this have it's own header such as 'Celebrations outside of Europe'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.88.154 (talk) 04:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was victory in the war that was waged in Europe, but that war was being waged by the Allies, including the US. Ie the US were at war in Europe, so they celebrated when the war ended and their troops could come home. (Eg, similar to the US's war(s) in Iraq.) Mitch Ames (talk) 03:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Europe

message: Any treatment of the Allied victory in Europe must include the Soviet Union, an ally in the war against Nazi Germany.  Any attempt at separate treatment of western and Soviet aspects and celebrations does injustice to the at least 12 million uniformed war dead on the Soviet side.  For those interested in history it must be remembered that the total U.S. uniformed war dead in WW-II (all theaters) was about 400,000.  Put into comparison with at least 12 million Soviet uniformed war dead and at least a comparable figure for civilians (numbers for both Soviet military and civilian war dead also have been calculated as much higher) this was a tragic but comparatively small price.Федоров (talk) 16:18, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: VE Day - thats what was celebrated in Britain I think - 'Victory Day' doesn't mean anything I don't think to the British , there was VE Day and then VJ Day. Its not a slight on anyones sacrifices, its a matter of historical record,  how the event was referred to in certain countries.  VE Day should be kept separate from other articles not about VE Day. Thats how I see it anyhow, Sayerslle (talk) 02:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The role of the USSR in the war against Nazi Germany is not that simple. One must remember that for the two first years of WW2, the USSR and Nazi-Germany were allies and co-aggressors. Hence, in the USSR one only learns about the 'great Patriotic war' from 1941-1945, while the coordinated Nazi/Soviet aggression in the first two years of WW2 is conveniently forgotten. Except of course in Poland, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania, all of them uncompensated victims of Soviet aggression. Only in 1991, after fifty years of Soviet repression did the Baltic countries regain their independence, while even today Poland finds it borders forcibly shifted towards the West. So from a central-European point of view, it makes perfect sense to distinguish between the VE-day on May 8th, and the terrible, terrible consequences for half of Europe due to the Soviet version of the victory on May 9th (per the Moscow timezone). Lklundin (talk) 11:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: So if it makes perfect sense to distinguish between the two what is your rationale for proposing a merge? Do we really need to have that banner spoiling the look of the article just when lots of people will be finding it with a google search who know nothing about, and have little interest in, wikipedia's more arcane processes? Richerman   (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Combine 8 and 9 May as celebrations of V-E Day

message: Which day of the week was 7 May 1945? --78.146.57.85 (talk) 21:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Day of the Week

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Victory in Europe Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150429214937/http://www.president.gov.ua:80/ru/news/32538.html to http://www.president.gov.ua/ru/news/32538.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Since Victory in Europe Day (Israel) has its own article, please replace the hatnote for "the former Soviet Union and Israel" with:
 
Please remove the Israel entry from the "See also" section as it is already linked in the article proper. 62.165.200.11 (talk) 06:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're right. That's done now. Well spotted and thanks very much. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote for Israel article 

message: In three places, the words "Great Britain" should be replaced with "the United Kingdom" (or "the UK"). VE Day was, and is, celebrated in Northern Ireland as well as Great Britain. 188.143.76.193 (talk) 17:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Changed as requested. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 20:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Kingdom, not Great Britain 

message: Why did Winston Churchill announce that "hostilities will end officially at one minute after midnight tonight Tuesday 8th May", when the German Instrument of Surrender, which had already been signed in Reims the previous day, stated "2301 hours Central European time on 8 May"? 23:01 CET was 23:01 BDST (British Double Summer Time from 1941 to 1945), 22:01 BST or 21:01 GMT. In any case, one minute past midnight would have been the next day, 9th May. There must be a good explanation, but given how often Churchill's speech is played as a piece of history, it ought to be explained on this page to avoid confusion. NFH (talk) 21:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time zone discrepancy between Churchill's speech and German Instrument of Surrender 

message: For Dutch Liberation Day it is stated that it is an Quinquennial national public but since 1990 it celebrated every year as a national public.
Source unfortunately in Dutch https://www.4en5mei.nl/herdenken-en-vieren/veelgestelde-vragen/achtergrondinformatie-vieren/geschiedenis
Law Book Article 3 https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0002448/2010-10-10 5th of May recognized as a public holiday
So
Chance Quinquennial national public to National Public 
And
Remove , a public holiday every 5 years. AHofstad (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it looks like Liberation Day (Netherlands) has it set as an annual celebration. The only source that states it as the former quinquennial holiday doesn't look too reliable. I have updated the article. Don Spencertalk-to-me⛅ 14:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2020 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Surrender of Nazi Germany. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11#Surrender of Nazi Germany until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  20:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Surrender of Nazi Germany" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: When I searched about VE Day, it shows me that "Location: Earth" in a small box on the google page (not Wikipedia). But inside the wikipedia page, there's no reference of "Location: Earth". Is this line added by Google itself on the search page, or was it picked up from somewhere within the Wikipedia page, like how the Lead paragraph was put in the box?--LostCitrationHunter (talk) 12:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Location: Earth"?