lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mayken Verhulst

message: I believe "Ces Moeurs et Fachons de Faire des Turcz" wasn't translated literally or the translation given in the article is wrong. "Ces Moeurs et Fachons de Faire des Turcz" could be translated as "The customs and ways of doing things (fashions) of the Turcs".
: Correct, that was the title of the book discussing her and the woodcut. I removed it. --Stomme 21:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
File talk:Alimullah.jpg

message: Some dim-wit is trying to get this image deleted on charges that it doesn't quote a source. Which it does, and a much better source than a mere website at that. It quotes the hard copy of the National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh as source. Can someone get that annoying editor to stop? He seems to be very keen on harassing me for reasons only he knows. Aditya Kabir 19:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this madness?
Talk:Tannakian formalism

message: The external link in the Formal Definition section is currently not working. -- Walt Pohl (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link? 

message: A tannakian category still comes equipped with a fiber (tensor) functor (whose automorphisms is the structure/Galois/fundamental/Tannaka group of the tannakian category), while the article says « the fiber functor Φ of the Galois theory is replaced by a tensor functor T from C to K-Vect. » I don't understand the choice of phrasing here, to me it is confusing. Plm203 (talk) 23:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiber functor
Talk:Silver City, New Mexico

message: Henry Antrim was not an alias. His birth name was Henry McCarty. When his mother married a man named Antrim, he and his brother had to change their last name to Antrim. Kid was just a nickname other people called him. Billy the Kid was created by a newspaper editor. His only alias was William H. Bonney. I know this seems like a petty detail, but I find it important. Hardly anyone gets that right. (No offense.) BiographyHound (talk) 16:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names and Aliases
Talk:The House (The Keys to the Kingdom)

message: These exact topics were placed at both this page and The Keys to the Kingdom. It shouldn't exist twice, and I think it goes better here, if at all. If you disagree, feel free to change it. Alcemáe   T  • C   19:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wings/Telephones/Elevators 

message: Does anyone know where the Denizens of the House page went? 75.88.133.61 23:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Axem Titanium made some a lot of changes to this series of articles, and merged several of the stub articles, such as Weirdways and the Improbable Stair, into this one. In addition, he merged the description of Denizens from that article into this one. The majority of the other information on that page was pretty much the same as the information on the Characters of The Keys to the Kingdom page. Alcemáe   T  • C   02:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denizens 

message: Should the article be titled The House or just House? I think The House, as it always referred to as such in the books. Anyone oppose or have an opinion? Alcemáe T • C 05:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections, so I'm going to do it. Alcemáe T • C 05:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "House" vs "The House"  

message: Arthur is described to be 6th in precedence in the beginning of Sir Thursday, and since Lady Wednesday died, he should be 5th, according to the 'Denizens' section. But Dame Primus could hold a higher precedence than him, since Arthur has delayed his full assumption of power and passed it on to her. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.95.132 (talk • contribs) 
:Hm. I hadn't even thought about Dame Primus. However, I don't think she would outrank him, but there's a chance it could happen. But, this is an article on what is known, and not speculation, so we can't really include it. Interesting point though. I  (said) (did) 20:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Might the Architect not be 1st in precidence? --212.219.245.253 11:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthur's Precedence within the House 

message: Much of this article has been written with out the inclusion of Lord Sunday. It says several times as of Superior Saturday such and such is in such a way. Cillian flood (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:ChuChu (The Legend of Zelda)

message: This article does not need to merge with the enemies article. Not only does it not need to get larger, but this article was split to shorten the page. ChuChus didn't play a huge role in Majora's Mask or Minish Cap, but in Wind Waker and Twilight Princess they began to make more appearances and became more important. --Superneoking 01:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is mostly cruft, and can easily be shortened to a paragraph or two, with a bulleted list. Since the enemies page is currently eliminating any enemies that are not true series mainstays, we're doing most of the work on User:KrytenKoro/Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series. The notes for the info we're merging (since Buzz Blob is mostly the same thing) are on the talk page. Once we have a good section created from the info, we can try readding it to the main article. Thanks!KrytenKoro 02:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty much all the meat of this article has been reduced to three short paragraphs and added to the Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series page. All that's left is a bulleted list of the the various colors of ChuChu, and that should be a few sentences, tops. This article should be ready to be turned into a redirect pretty soon.KrytenKoro 04:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: http://www.zeldawiki.org/Buzz_Blob
Buzz Blobs are not Chuchus. I have removed the Link's Awakening section from the article. 72.193.0.212 17:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buzz Blobs
Talk:List of younger sons of dukes in the peerages of the British Isles

message: User:Black Falcon has proposed that this page be deleted due to concerns about notability and a lack of sources. However, while I share the concern over the lack of attribution, I don't feel that the page should be deleted. As Black Falcon pointed out, it was originally split off from Order of precedence in England and Wales, and is in use there (and, I think, on Order of precedence in Northern Ireland and Order of precedence in Scotland). I do not agree with Black Falcon's statement that "[i]t is not wanted or needed there (or really anywhere else)", and I think that, at a minimum, the matter should be discussed with contributors to the UK order-of-precdence pages before any drastic action is taken.
Furthermore, in response to the statement that "in terms of peerages, priority goes to eldest sons rather than younger sons", I'd like to point out that, while younger sons do not inherit peerages, they do gain precedence from them, and thus this list is wanted and needed on the order-of-precedence pages. Alkari (?) 22:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, how about merging the list with List of younger sons of dukes in the peerages of the British Isles as a separate section? There's already a section for eldest sons, so that seems the logical place for this list of younger sons. Black Falcon (Talk) 16:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would be very much in favor of that, although I wouldn't mind waiting a few days to see how others feel about this matter. Alkari (?) 00:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine with me. I'll tag the pages with  and  so that the proposed merge is more publicised. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 02:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Black Falcon (Talk) 00:51, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability and proposed deletion
Talk:Chʼoltiʼ language

message: Added references and historical info, and info to infobox, and so removed the stub tag. Article could use a map showing 17th cent extent of lang, maybe from Becquey 2012, and tonnes more info on language syntax, etc. History sec could also be expanded w into on language contact. – Asdfjrjjj (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  23 Aug 2023 edits
Talk:Gorilla Kingdom

message: I Think this article should either be merged into London Zoo or Deleted. It's not really that important to be given its own article in my opinion.
Ae12079410 19:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put up a merge proposal on the London Zoo talk page. Chris_huhtalk 15:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This has now been merged with London Zoo. Chris_huhtalk 18:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Arthur Lyon Fremantle

message: I'm not convinced that the quote from the movie Gettysburg is entirely accurate, when compared to the phrasing of it on imdb.com, although I shall have a look at the movie to check.  However, I'm also not entirely sure that the quote is really relevant here, since it deals more with General Lee, General Pickett, The Theory of Evolution, than it does with Arthur Fremantle himself.  Furthermore, it is from a fictional account.  I propose removing it, or at least incorporating it into a larger section concerning the character of Arthur Fremantle as he appears in the movie, which is part of my overall ambition to expand this article to a decent size.  I'd like to hear what others think first, though.
Theoctopusking 19:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, that page of quotes on IMDB is pretty extensive. People with a lot of time on their hands, apparently. Unlike the folks in Wikipedia. :-) I agree with your proposal. While you're at it, how about adding some References to the article. Hal Jespersen 20:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Evolution Quote

message: I fear that I might possibly be going into too much detail on his travels.  Perhaps the sections I have already been working on should be transferred to the article on the book itself?  However, I'd like to finish the account of his visit to the C.S.A here before a final decision.  Once the main body of the article is done, I'll add in footnotes.  Once again, I'd appreciate any thoughts.
Theoctopusking 10:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Three Months in the Southern States

message: I personally think that the mention of Hughes should remain here.  I am going to restore it for the time being, and would appreciate any further comments.  Hughes is, indeed, probably just one of several Fremantle re-enactors.  However, his role in driving the grave restoration project in Brighton, as well as his close connections to the present-day Fremantle family and his website, which is the only one of its kind on the internet, makes him a notable figure.
Theoctopusking (talk) 19:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Roger Hughes

message: He seems to have changed his surname in about 1874: in the Army List for 1872–73 (page 25) he is listed as "Arthur James Fremantle" but in the List for 1873–74 (page 23) he is "Arthur James Lyon-Fremantle". Opera hat (talk) 09:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname
Talk:Woodmont (Gladwyne, Pennsylvania)

message: There is a picture claimed to be of Woodmont Here.  The bottom of the page has this text:
Copyright stipulations.
GOD is a free gift to the world. Any and all of the material on this and other pages may be copied and reproduced, but not for profit.
Use the material freely but respect FATHER DIVINE'S intent, which was and is, to provide us all with the keys to eternal health and happiness without cost or price. HE truly came as a free gift to the world, gratis to mankind.
It is also nice to give credit where credit is due for through the Spirit and Teaching of FATHER and MOTHER DIVINE you are and can eternally be abundantly blessed.
From all of us to all of you. we wish you, peace and love, and many blessings, and may we all ever live in unity and brotherhood and the Consciousness of GOD'S Actual Ever Presence.
True Americanism, True Brotherhood, True Christianity, True Judaism and All True Religions are synonymous and truly Our GOD is One GOD. Amen
Thank you for visiting our page.
Thank YOU, FATHER and MOTHER DIVINE for allowing us to put this information on line.
So, if it is a picture of Woodmont, and if they actually are the owners of the picture, we could upload it here.  I do think it would be a great addition to the article, but I don't really care enough to verify that it is actually the mansion, and that they actually own the picture.  So, if someone else cares, this could be a start.  CharacterZero | Speak 19:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: URL seems no longer valid, oh well. doncram (talk) 13:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: The history of the turnover to Father Divine is almost certainly wrong.  The following is from the Main Line newspaper in 2009:
Even with all of the beauty of Woodmont, after her husband’s death, Mrs. Wood thought the mansion and estate “were too isolated” and sold the property to a nephew, Richard G. Wood. In 1929 he subdivided 73 acres of the estate, which included the manor house and five other buildings, and sold it to J. Hector McNeal, a corporate lawyer known for his horsemanship. Under his ownership, the interior of the main house underwent renovations.
But the estate was neglected for a number of years after the death of Mrs. McNeal. It was sold in 1953 to the International Peace Mission Movement and Father Divine for $75,000.
Other accounts agree with this.  Mrs. McNeal was a follower of Father Divine and wanted him to have the estate, but apparently she did not give it to him directly.  I can find no reference to a "John Devoute" (unless that was Mrs. McNeal's adopted spiritual name).
Ekconklin (talk) 02:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Woodmont
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Doomsday Called Off

message: 5-4 is a consensus? ~ UBeR 19:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not a vote. The last keep was by an recently registered user. One other "keeps" failed to back up their claims so would (I guess) be somewhat discounted; another was based on broken googling William M. Connolley 20:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they backed up their claims more so than the deletionist. The Google bit was done incorrectly, but even done correctly it yields 198,000 results (quite a bit more than another entry that Wikipedia deems notable). The article was properly sourced, so... ~ UBeR 20:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not going to argue about me. But clearly Ronnotel *didn't* back up his claims, even when asked to William M. Connolley 20:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick Google search fixes that though. ~ UBeR 21:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sadly the closing admin was unable to predict your future posts; and Ronnotel obviously didn't think so either William M. Connolley 21:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly. ~ UBeR 22:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Robert R. Blacker House

message: This article, although ostensibly about the house, mentions almost nothing of its design, layout, construction methods, materials, and siting.  Instead, it is devoted almost wholly to a (rather inflammatory) lament about what happened to the house, grounds, and furnishings after the Blackers' death, with most of the citations from the last few years.  This does not seem appropriate under the circumstances.
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems quite reasonable to me.  --Panzer71 (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The house itself
Talk:Peter Löscher

message: Dear editors:  Here are some publicity photos of Peter Loescher. http://www.siemens.com/press/en/presspicture/index.php?view=list&division=&tag=loescher
I don't know your style standards, or I would pick one for you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.202.28.10 (talk) 21:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:DVR

message: Dear sirs and madams of [EN]Wikipedia, and fellow beings, 
I would like to request you to redirect this page to  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_video_recorder  also known as Digital_video_recorder and put a disambiguation notice on the top of the page such as "This page refers to the recorder, for other uses see DVR (disambiguation)." 
Of course, I am not asking you to do it right away! Please discuss, seek a consensus and then we will see what to do. 
Thank you for your kind co-operation. 
Sincerely yours, 
Kushal Hada --Click me! 19:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?
Talk:History of rail transport in the Netherlands

message: I expanded this pages slightly again, however, I don't have much time so it isn't progressing as nicely as I had hoped. Crownsteler 22:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continued work 
Category talk:Association football manager history navigational boxes

message: Should we gradually start replacing the succession boxes that many managers' articles have with these templates? I personally think the templates look better and give more information. Having both the succession boxes and the templates in articles is essentially pointless. Sir-Nobby 20:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and that's actually what I did when I started implementing these templates. It was reverted in many cases, though, maybe the number of templates needs to be more comprehensive in order to fully replace succession boxes. ArtVandelay13 22:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone got an opinion on having a show/hide option on the templates? Sir-Nobby 22:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll give it a go when I get around to it; it's quite complicated but I've done it before. The main problem is that you can't adjust the colour - so the [hide] link will still appear blue on a blue background. But perhaps it's better than nothing. ArtVandelay13 22:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

text: They already do, providing the actual article is linked to, and not a redirect. ArtVandelay13 19:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

message: OK, I've added the show/hide option on Newcastle United managers template, but does anyone know how to set it to hide on default? Sir-Nobby 17:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Show/Hide option
Talk:Pan-European Oil Pipeline

message: http://www.conpet.ro/pipes.htm
http://www.conpet.ro/images/peop.JPG  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.40.240.184 (talk) 14:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proporsed pipeline picture and site
Talk:Syphon Filter: Logan's Shadow

message: Someone with this game update the Plot section... I do not Mujarimojo 05:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to play it this weekend. I'll get to it then. - Throw 12:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll help as well. ShinraiTS4 18:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I started it but need help. Blackhawk45nrg 23:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am one of the few who have completed the story on Hard Mode and beat the bonus mission, Shadowed, which reveals many hidden clues within the plot. I have added a small section to the Plot to cover this (I didn't want to give too many details away). Exeneva 20:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: story

message: The entire Censorship section needs citations and the following sentence makes no sense whatsoever: "Many of the sequels were given a "T" rating before those games shipped, and were given the "M" rating before the game shipped." MafiaCapo 00:03, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LMFAO!!! I wrote that. Wow, what was I smoking?? Thanks for pointing that out, but damn, I really laughed hard after reading your comment. ShinraiTS4 21:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Censorship

message: I hope people help edit this and stuff. I don't feel like doing everything myself. T_T ShinraiTS4 20:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hmm

message: The plot section is, quite simply, far too long.  Please discuss the reasons for this here on the talk page.  Plot sections should be concise, as set out in WP:PLOT.  Just so no one can claim ignorance, a definition of 'concise' is available on wiktionary here.  Reasons such as 'Other articles have long plot sections' are not applicable.  By that rationale, other articles contain original research, so this one should too.  Obviously this is a rather erroneous line of thinking.  Thanks!  Geoff B (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlong plot section.
Talk:Group isomorphism

message: It's not very encyclopedic, I know, but an even simple example is that the group of integers under addition is isomorphic to the group of all even integers under addition. That's an example that a younger person who is unfamiliar with logs can understand: the groups "work the same".
We could also introduce a counterexample - the group generated by flipping a piece of paper horizontally and vertically (the klein 4 group?) is not the same as the group generated by rotating a piece of paper by 90 degrees. The groups "work differently" - in the flipping group, each operation undoes itself if you do it twice, wheras that's not true of the rotation group.
Interestingly - each 4 group has 2 two subgroups that are all isomorphic.
Well - maybe not interesting to you, but possibly interesting to a mathematically inclined 8 or 10 year old.
Paul Murray (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Even simpler example 

message: What does the odot mean e.g. in f(u * v) = f(u) \odot f(v)? Len loker (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circle-dot symbol
Talk:Blono Buccellati

message: what is the correct spelling of his name Bucciarati or Buccellati. 67.164.35.55 06:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Buccellati" was officially used in the video game whereas "Bucciarati" was used in a fan-made English translation of a Chinese translation of the original Japanese. Erigu (talk) 12:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name
Talk:Battle of Nà Sản

message: there is an interesting dossier here. i have no time to use it by now, so I post it if anyone is interested for the indochina war battle. Paris By Night 23:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: dossier

message: Assessed as start - some issues need to be addressed: quotes in the lede need to be removed (B3), bullet points in the background and aftermath sections (B4). Needs cites throughout. Zawed (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Milhist B-class assessment

message: Legion is part of the French army, no need to separate it from France. I deleted Legion icon.109.190.97.85 (talk) 12:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belligerents 
Talk:Surgical pathology

message: (reposted from Talk:Pathology)
I just conducted large revisions to two pages (Pathology and Anatomical pathology) and created a third (Surgical pathology) to better coordinate and define the content on these three closely related topics. As a result of the revision, material that focuses on the overall skills, certification, and practice of anatomic pathologists was concentrated in the page Anatomical pathology, while some of this content was trimmed from Pathology, which has a much broader scope. Content specifically related to the skills, workflow, and subspecializations of surgical pathology were moved to the new page surgical pathology. I think this change is a significant improvement, but I welcome any feedback and additional editorial revisions. -RustavoTalk/Contribs 20:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Multi-page revision

message: Hope people like the new page. The "workflow" section is a skeleton for now - I'll fill it in when I have the time, but contributions from others would be very welcome. References are also on the way. -RustavoTalk/Contribs 20:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content needed for new page