lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cataclasis

message: This subject or concept can be dealt with on the other page in full.Rolinator 11:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely agree --Geologyguy 15:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

text: There is a new article for Cataclasite that I think covers the subject matter of the existing Cataclastic & Cataclasis pages and provides a fuller treatment overall. Mikenorton 15:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great - go for it (the mergers, I mean).  Cheers Geologyguy 17:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fields of Omagh

message: I suspect the image used in this article is copyright. The information left at the website that was the source of the image clearly states this here.Mattinbgn 11:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Please check the registered names of horses before changing them. Fields Of Omagh was registered as such. See ASB. Cgoodwin (talk) 21:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Horse names
Talk:Cataclastic rock

message: The Cataclastic and Cataclasite pages are both rather short and overlap a great deal in content. I suggest that they are merged into Cataclasite. Mikenorton (talk) 11:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Following discussion on the Talk:Cataclasite page, the merge is not going ahead. However, this page is going to be moved to 'Cataclastic rock' and is undergoing a complete rewrite to remove anything about porphyroclasts or 'mortar' texture, which are now known to be characteristic of ductile deformation and crystal-plastic processes. Mikenorton (talk) 12:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with Cataclasite
Talk:Rude Boy (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: The band members were so disenchanted with the film by its release that they had Better Badges make badges stating 'I don't want Rude Boy Clash Film'.  I'm not sure to understand. Does this mean the band members didn't like the film or it was just ironic ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.32.202.111 (talk) 20:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They were not happy with the film. Wwwhatsup (talk) 20:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Should be something in the article about how the film portrays the band in a rather negative light... AnonMoos (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disenchanted by the film 

message: Chris Henderson singer of the band Combat 84 played also a Roadie or something,or not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.54.181.144 (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roadie
Talk:Repeat Offender (Richard Marx album)

message: This article was moved back to the title Repeat Offender because there are no other articles that carry that specific title.  The article recidivism is the closest definition for a "repeat offender." Maybe a disambiguation should be made for this particular term?  --Candy156sweet (talk) 01:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

message: An editor made the mistake to think the David Cole on this album is the David Cole of C+C Music Factory, it is not, it is another David Cole. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 15:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't make this mistake please
Talk:Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector

message: The article should explain how the results conflict with the expectatipn of 3 neutrimo flavors. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 07:07, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I don't get it. What were the conflicts, exactly?  linas (talk) 19:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

text: There are/were a couple levels of conflict. First, at the time of the initial results, there was a claim that the measurement itself might be faulty, and another experiment looking at (almost) the same parameter space which disagreed with the findings. I was the author on a paper published simultaneously with the original oscillation claim which disputed its conclusion from within the collaboration (which is why I should not edit the content of this page myself). The follow-up analyses done through the years have gone back and forth a bit on the real significance of the result, and in fact while in the analysis framework of the original publication the newer experiment Mini-BoooNE "rules out" the original result, analyses with more degrees of freedom allow some region. Sterile neutrino solutions are prominent ones with significant allowed parameter space, especially given the constraints of what is known from other experiments in different channels. If someone is interested I can point to some sources and do my best to be neutral, but that person should look critically at whatever I say (even though I am right ;) )JimHill (talk) 02:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the flavor conflict? 

message: The sentence: "Cosmological data bound the mass of the sterile neutrino to ms < 0.26eV (0.44eV) at 95% (99.9%) confidence limit, excluding at high significance the sterile neutrino hypothesis as an explanation of the LSND anomaly" is a bit too strong. It is the conclusion of the referenced paper, but many other papers come to different conclusions. It depends on how much you restrict your model space (do we have dark energy evolving, are the ordinary neutrinos assumed massive), the assumptions you make about the sterile neutrino (like no lepton asymmetry, no late time reheating phase) and how many datasets you combine. The more realistic bound from cosmology is probably around ms < 2eV.  Unsigned comment added 06:28, 23 May 2012‎ User talk:130.225.0.251 .
:Please be bold, and edit this article appropriately! linas (talk) 19:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sterile neutrino hypothesis excluded?
Talk:Real time (media)

message: There is an alternative meaning to "real time" in music that apparently is not addressed in Wikipedia.  When musicians record a musical piece in real time, it means that they are playing together and recording at the same time.  By contrast, if the musicians were to record their parts separately and then overdub or combine them onto a single recording, that would not be considered playing or recording in real time.   174.56.173.38 (talk) 13:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Real time in music

message: I've added 12 Angry Men (1957) to the list because, as I recall, it is done in Real Time - however, I may be mistaken and will watch it again to confirm. For the time being, I'm leaving it on the list, as IMDb lists it as Real Time on their webpage. 67.40.243.226 11:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 1 

message: Does the Stargate Atlantis Episodes Thirty-Eight Minutes Count? The only question I have is if a brief flashback during a story and the last few minutes (after the conflict is resolved) not occurring in realtime exlude it. 216.86.103.72 05:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2 

message: Duel? (Steven Spielberg) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.190.208.141 (talk) 18:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 3 

message: The first Die Hard is in real time, surely? I can't think of any time skips in the story at all. Fenton Bailey 08:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Die Hard 1 

message: Real time can be used as a technique in pen and paper role-playing, for realism, immersion and limiting of time to think in what should be a stressed situation. This is described in my old Swedish Drakar och demoner rules, and I'm sure in various other games as well. Might be worth including. Ever wonder (talk) 00:21, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pen and paper role playing games 

message: In the comics, Garfield's age is always said to be the same as the strip itself, does that count? 50.178.185.7 (talk) 04:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garfield 

message: To be clear -- 1917 is not real time, regardless of what the "see also" section may have you believe  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.194.8.174 (talk) 03:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1917 

message: Was Titanic a real time film? I read that the movie was made to approximately follow the timescale of the actual ship sinking, about 2 and a half hours, which is why it ended up so long. RedPanda25 02:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titanic
Talk:Massless particle

message: The table in this article listing the physical massless particles contains a row for Weyl fermions and labels them as "confirmed". To my knowledge, Weyl fermions have not been experimentally confirmed to exist. Neutrinos were originally thought to be Weyl fermions but we now know that they are not. This label of "confirmed" is therefore either wrong, or it is misleading and I am misunderstanding its meaning. Note that if Weyl fermions have indeed been experimentally confirmed to exist (and I am just not personally aware of it), then this is a big deal and the "confirmed" statement should definitely have a citation to a research article supporting this claim. I am not an expert in this area, so I hesitate to make this change myself. 192.195.76.57 (talk) 14:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weyl fermions have not been confirmed
Talk:Magnetic photon

message: I can sympathize with ranking this as 'low', but since Landau & Lifshitz classic QM text refers to "electric photons" and "magnetic photons", can't we raise the priority a little bit? Enough, say, to include the description in terms of angular momentum (polarization) and parity? Or even to explain why only electric photons are physical?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.119.233.212 (talk) 02:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reduced the priority to mid, reserving high priority for particles that are part of current mainstream theories.  No disagreement with you adding the other things you suggest.  Djr32 (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Majoron

message: Since majorons are bosons they are different from majorana fermions. --Ernsts (talk) 22:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Majorons and Majorana fermions 

message: See
: https://scitechdaily.com/split-photons-new-research-predicts-the-existence-of-a-previously-unimaginable-particle/
for Majorana bosons.--Ernsts (talk) 08:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Majorana bosons
Talk:Mark I (detector)

message: I have added a number of details describing the components of the Mark I. Additional material would be extremely helpful. Regrettably, photographs of the equipment are not available without restrictions, meaning they can't be displayed on Wikimedia commons.
please message me at @CarlFriedberg or contact me on my personal email carl at comets dot me CarlFriedberg (talk) 18:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details of Mark I
Talk:Muon capture

message: Can positive muons decay with muon capture in any way?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.235.50.255 (talk) 10:04, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Negative muons can form muonic atoms in which the muon replaces an electron (as in muon-catalysed fusion), which allows them to interact with the nucleus for a longer period of time than in a collision. Both positive and negative muons can undergo collisions with nuclei, but positive muons can't form muonic atoms with normal matter (but can with antimatter). Therefore the reaction  +  → μ +  occurs at lower rates. This might be referred as to muon-induced decay rather than muon capture. Lavateraguy (talk) 16:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

message: According to the article on muons they are very penetrative. If they could be produced in quantities large enough for transmutation of macroscopic amounts of nuclear waste, how could one control that they react with the waste as supposed and not with everything else in the surrounding making more radioactive isotopes rather than reducing the amount of radioactivity.
Also, would muon transmutation be applied to processed or unprocessed waste? For what isotopes would muon transmutation be beneficial, and how would other radioactive and stable isotopes in the waste react?150.227.15.253 (talk) 20:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: All those things are analogous for neutron induced transmutation and the proposed solutions in both cases are similar: Produce as (chemically and if need be isotopically) pure a target as you can, provide shielding that either does not do too many harmful things or can be safely disposed or discarded. So, as so often, the problem is hard but not unsolvable and the devil lies in the detail... Hobbitschuster (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can muon transmutation be controled?
Talk:Neutral current

message: The interaction is often incorrectly believed to be called 'neutral' because the Z boson has no electric charge. However, the neutral current that gives the interaction its name is that of the interacting particles.
Aren't the two facts, the interacting particles preserving their charges and the neutrality of the Z boson complimentary? I can't see the difference and justify the comment above. - Fatka (talk · contribs) 07:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment about etymology of the name 

message: This article seems to use a bit of mathematical symbology that it does not define. For the average user such as myself, it's difficult to follow what these equations describe:
*\mathfrak{M}^{\mathrm{NC}} \propto J_{\mu}^{\mathrm{(NC)}}(\nu_{\mathrm{e}}) \; J^{\mathrm{(NC)}\mu}(\mathrm{e^{-}})
*J^{\mathrm{(NC)}\mu}(f) = \bar{u}_{f}\gamma^{\mu}\frac{1}{2}\left(g^{f}_{V}-g^{f}_{A}\gamma^{5}\right)u_{f},
It would be nice to see the meanings/physical implications of \mathfrak{M}^{\mathrm{NC}}, J_{\mu}^{\mathrm{(NC)}},  J^{\mathrm{(NC)}\mu}, \bar{u}_{f}, u_{f}, \gamma^{\mu}, and \gamma^{5} clearly enumerated in this article. At the very least, I feel that links to relevant explanatory articles are necessary. 18.111.8.158 (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formulae? 

message: Thought it would be nice to help average users as bit, as suggested by anonymous above, so have had a go.Reflection (talk) 18:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  In simple terms 
Talk:Whatever the Case May Be

message: Requested move for:
*Live Together, Die Alone (Lost) → Live Together, Die Alone
*The Glass Ballerina (Lost) → The Glass Ballerina
*Whatever the Case May Be (Lost) → Whatever the Case May Be
Discuss/vote here --`/aksha 03:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Just pinging you in case you're interested in working on this episode— totally ok if you don't want to. Thanks for all of the work so far :)-Newyorkadam (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Neutral particle

message: Someone added a neutral point of view dispute template. Given the lack of a comment on the talk page, I presume it was an oh-so-clever act of irony; if it wasn't, please re-add the template and state your concern about the neutrality of the article. Ashill (talk) 02:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral point of view dispute?
Talk:Neutralino

message: I believe that these neutralinos may be the dark matter that makes up 96 percent of our universe. Neutralinos seem to have properties similar to that of dark matter, so I believe that dark matter is composed of neutralinos. However, I do not believe they are supersymmetrical (I do not believe in supersymmetry). The neutralinos are just a form of regular matter only with very mysterious properties. I also feel that neutralinos should be given an induvidual Greek or Roman letter to represent them, rather than having that complex jumble.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.104.153.113 (talk) 17:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Statements that begin "I believe" are useless without having known authorship. The identity and contributions of the author are relevant in evaluating the usefulness, relevance, and probable correctness of such statements. In the absence of adequate theory and experiment, concepts such as neutralinos cannot be evaluated except by the intuition of gifted physicists. Those who are not gifted should probably refrain from expressing their opinions outside of their domain of confirmed knowledge and experience, to avoid generating needless confusion or polarization of opinion. David Spector (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutralino: The Mighty Dark Matter 

message: The tone of the article suggests that neutralinos are known to exist, but the article doesn't come-out-and-say this.
Is there a documented observation of a neutralino? If so, the usual details (where, how, by whom, etc.) should be given.
166.137.101.148 (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In its current version, the article states that neutralinos are merely hypothetical. This is true, for all we know today. There have been extensive searches for supersymmetric particles, but nothing has been found yet. Source: Particle Data Group > The Review of Particle Physics > Reviews, Tables, Plots > Hypothetical Particles and Concepts > Supersymmetry: experiment. --2001:16B8:17C8:C000:9087:8988:B926:9DCD (talk) 21:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known particle?
Talk:Neutron drip line

message: The article states: "The values of the neutron drip line are only known for the first eight elements, hydrogen to oxygen.[1] For Z = 8, the maximal number of neutrons is 16, resulting in the (still-undiscovered) O-24 as the heaviest possible oxygen isotope.[2]"
However this Wikipedia link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_isotopes clearly has information the 24O isotope (up to 28O). Thus, either this article is incorrect or the table of oxygen nuclides is. Davidl9999 (talk) 20:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for noting. I have tried to bring the two articles in accordance. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 12:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  <sup>24</sup>0 Undiscovered? 

message: The article http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913170108.htm might be of use. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: I removed the following dead link from the article: 
*Journey Along the Neutron Dripline--Roentgenium111 (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Link still works for me so maybe we can put it back...?  Though it is pretty unintelligible to the lay person (i.e. Me) --131.111.109.169 (talk) 10:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For me the link doesn't work. However replacing the "ppt" by "pdf" works for me. So if the two links have the same content, we might add the latter, if it's useful. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: Such as one like this: 
[]
Don't know if it's accurate though.  --131.111.109.169 (talk) 10:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A graphical representation would be good
Talk:The Haunted World of El Superbeasto

message: When is it expected to be screened ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RzR (talk • contribs).
*IMDb says May, although I can't confirm that this is correct. (Sugar Bear (talk 08:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release

message: This entry should either be about the comic and the film should be at The Haunted World of El Superbeasto (film) or this should be a disambiguation page to them both. As the comic came first the film shouldn't have the top slot. (Emperor 16:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After consulation it seems best to create the comic entry at The Haunted World of El Superbeasto (comics) and decide what to do about disambiguating it later. I see the trade paperback came out last month from Image Comics (). I'll keep an eye out for reviews. (Emperor 01:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comic

message: Has the project been abandoned? It seems like it should've been out by now.
Dark Executioner 14:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned? 

message: I happened to be browsing the internet, and I came across this, and I was wondering if it could be use as the image for this page?  JpGrB 03:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that would work. If I'm not mistaken, thats the cover for the comic that the film is based on. Currently there isn't a signifigant enough mention or description of the comic for the cover to be uploaded to wikipedia. -Lindsey8417 23:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  JpGrB 23:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: No one seems to be able to make up their mind whether the name of the Nazi Zombie general, as voiced by Rob Paulsen, is "Col. Hans Wolfburger", "Commandant Hess", or simply "Nazi Zombie". This place, Rotten Tomatoes, and various wiki pages seem to call him Wolfburger, IMDB and the credits of the movie on the DVD lists him as Commandant Hess, whereas the opening on the DVD menu introduces him as "Nazi Zombie". One of his quotes on IMDB is also attributed as "Nazi Zombie" (though listed under the wrong voice actor, which I submitted for correction).
Can we agree that, by means of the DVD's own ending credits and cast roll, his name should be Commandant Hess?  --H Hog (talk) 14:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the Nazi Zombie General? 

message: I just watched this video in its entirety.  I find it hard to believe it costs $10M to produce.  Does anyone have a source? Hobbamock (talk) 01:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof of Budget

message: Robotboy animation director works for the EL SUPERBEASTO film, and I think someone else has to pay! --AdwenKnowItAll (talk) 18:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: That was not my film

message: Is this movie set in the world of the House of a Thousand Corpses trilogy? I ask because both mention Dr. Satan Triviatronic9000 (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related to the Live Action films?
Talk:Nuclear Instrumentation Module

message: As far as I know, "NIM" stands for "National Instrumentation Methods". See for example here:  --ulm (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronym 

message: Most of the references are not authoritative and are not referenced in the text. I am moving the following to "see also". I'm not sure they are worth mentioning there when we have the specification document in the references that clearly defines the intended specifications to international standards.Roggg (talk) 13:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I think it's a bit misleading to say that they are uncommon in particle physics today. I would say NEW and specifically LARGE systems built today in HEP won't use them. Plenty of prototype systems still do. I can think of 5 built in the last few years that do, for instance. If we are going to have unsited opinions in there, I'd rather they were at least the unsited ones I agree with. I'll try and change it to something more general, but if someone has some reasonable source on the subject we should site it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.91.65.29 (talk) 18:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commonality of NIM Crates
Talk:NOvA

message: According to the history tab, the page was moved here 'because 'NOvA' (with a lower case v) is the official spelling.  I am not entirely sure: The original intent was that it should be written with a lowercase nu where possible, and a lower case V if not.  But the collaboration does seem to prefer a lower case V in recent publications.  --180.43.26.173 (talk) 05:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name: NOvA or NOνA? 

message: Someone with more knowledge than I needs to go through and fix the various tenses, now that this project is (substantially?) complete.
-- 72.74.172.226 (talk) 12:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing tenses 