lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boeing Bird of Prey

message: "Government sponsored norm"
This is interesting. Could anyone expand on this?
On a different note: I think the name "Switchblade" has been reassigned to a skew-wing [one wing swept forward, one swept back; its weird, but so is the Nighthawk] aircraft project- can anyone confirm or discount this?
:The Switchblade codename shift for the skew-wing was published last autumn, I believe. 131.207.236.198 11:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Great Pit of Carkoon

message: I marked this with  for a few reasons:
# The events at the Great Pit of Carkoon were hardly a battle;
# The tiny bit of information on this page that is expanded upon from the information at Great Pit of Carkoon is hardly enough to warrant a new article;
# Most people looking for information on Carkoon will go to Great Pit of Carkoon—why not put all information on that article?
Therefore, I propose that this page be marged with Great Pit of Carkoon. – Mipadi 21:38, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>{{mergefrom}}</nowiki> 

message: I like the idea of merging this article with Sarlacc. It could probably go in the Location section. "Sarlacc" needs to be expanded anyway. – Mipadi 12:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged this article with Sarlacc. Dmoon1 04:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome work on Sarlacc! – Mipadi 12:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Dmoon1 13:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Sarlacc
Talk:BBS: The Documentary

message: Isn't "Compression" the eight and last episode? That's how they are listed on the dvdrip version i watched, this screenshot from the dvd menu also suggests that order. bbx 05:06, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, bbx, be sure to visit http://www.bbsdocumentary.com/warez --Jscott 21:12, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes

message: It looks like you only got the first few letters to link.
--angrykeyboarder 08:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ED2K links are bad

message: All I see on the website is links to the sale of the DVD, no free download. Sephiroth storm (talk) 04:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free
Talk:Formby Gang

message: Either "Bill Duffer" or "Dulfer" is a typo. I don't know which, because I can't find any of this stuff with Google. Art LaPella 05:19, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
:* The correct name is "Bill Dulfer". I've since fixed the typo. Thanks for the heads up. MadMax 22:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fort Pickens

message: "Fort Pickens held the distinction of being the only Southern fort not to be captured by the Confederacy."
But what about Fort Monroe? Jbhood 12:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I readded the reference, but I altered it to read "the only Southern fort in the original seven Confederate States of America to remain uncaptured by the Confederady."  After the Ft. Sumpter fell, Ft. Pickens was the only Southern fort not in Union hands, then when more states seceded, more forts remained uncaptured.  Emperor001 (talk) 05:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Southern fort not captured? 

message: Article appears to have stale information, specifically relating to post Hurricane Ivan repairs.  //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 13:09, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 
Talk:Marada Movement

message: you're inserting biased, unsourced and ungrammatical changes to this article: most importantly unsourced. either discuss your changes here, or on Talk:Lebanese Forces. as i've told you, i'm going to revert this until you provide a source or a good rationale for what you're writing. Arre 01:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: these new edits need a language check and removal of bias, although it's better than before. the claim that the marada brigades remain intact since the early 80s definitely needs a source, and so do some other things too. also, please use the "show preview" button instead of "save page" when editing. Arre 01:23, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: anonymous editor

message: I have removed the WikiSyria banner, as there is no link between the current content and Syria (as a country) there might be some political alliance, but no geographical links (unless all of the Lebanese articles would be enlisted under the WikiSyria project too.)
K epsilon (talk) 00:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiSyria????

message: Is this a serious article or a joke? This page should be red marked as biased!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.9.121.93 (talk) 11:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Al-Marada unofficial Site?

message: This page needs serious rewriting. This article is one of the worst violations of neutrality one can come with and in its present status, needs a serious rewriting and reorganization from a neutral standpoint werldwayd (talk) 16:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Shouldn't' this be merged with Zgharta Liberation Army? I don't see any difference between the two. FunkMonk (talk) 15:16, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Zgharta Liberation Army? 
Talk:List of The Sopranos writers

message: I think it's somewhat inaccurate to refer to the writers as "main writers," "frequent writers," and "less frequent writers."
In episodic television, most writers are hired on "staff." Most of the credited Sopranos writers have been on staff, hired on a season-to-season basis. Many of these writers receive some kind of "producer" credit, too -- co-executive producer, supervising producer, etc.
Most all staff writers work on all episodes in some capacity. Some staff writers are assigned to work only on specific characters. The Writers Guild of America has complex rules for who can get a writing credit on any particular episode -- an original writer often can be credited more than a rewriting writer. So someone can be on staff for several years, write on every episode but still have very few episode credits.
David Hoag 05:50, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Rational choice theory

message: The introduction to this article says that Rational Choice Theory is often associated with the "invisible hand" and as proof cites the Levin and Milgrom Chapter. But Levin and Milgrom don't talk about the invisible hand in that chapter or elsewhere that I can find. And it's not included anywhere else in the article. Should it be better referenced, or omitted? Llamabr (talk) 12:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Invisible Hand
Talk:Authorized use of force

message: The first sentence below is not a sentence and neglects Wikipedia's highlighting convention.  It runs on for a ridiculously long time and is disorganized.  The article lacks links. (By Michael Hardy)
:It also contanins gratutious US-bashing -- yes, the US is a particularly notable user of this tactic, but they are far from being the only ones. -- The Anome 18:11, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I agree, indeed I see little need for this article or the one on police force, since as euphemisms they could surely be merged with something else. For the time being, here is an attempt to clean up the article.--217.16.87.168 11:49, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up
Talk:Elections in Israel

message: The first entry in the table on ballot letters ... quite surprised me. Is this for real, or just vandalism? --KarlFrei (talk) 21:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For real and quite logical. --Shuki (talk) 07:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First two letters of Cannabis 

message: * Support - A short surf through other countries' elections articles and cats reveals that the 'Elections in ___' is the standard template. On the other hand, I think that I would support changing the name of the Ballot letters page to 'Voting in Israel'. --Shuki (talk) 07:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge from voting in Israel 

message: So when is the next one going to be? Is there a timetable yet, or a deadline? 70.99.104.234 (talk) 21:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It will have to be by 2013, but given Israeli political history, could happen at any time between now and then. Number 57 09:08, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Next one

message: explains a lot of process.--Metallurgist (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  link dump 

message: Should make it clearer that this means that there is no geographical component to Israeli parliament elections -- the whole country is effectively one big consituency.  This might not be obvious to non-Israelis... AnonMoos (talk) 13:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "nationwide proportional elections"

message: >> New Israeli law kills minority representation(Lihaas (talk) 19:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Hebrew and Arabic do not have "perfectly corresponding" character sets.  Arabic has more letters than Hebrew does.  Some Arabic letters that do not exist in Hebrew (and are also sometimes very difficult to transliterate into the Latin character set include dad (ض), ghayin (غ), za (ظ), and  dhal (ذ).  Hebrew letters can correspond to more than one Arabic letter, e.g., the Hebrew root זבח, having to do with sacrificing and/or slaughtering, is cognate to Arabic ذ ب ح and not ز ب ح.  As I say, it's a quibble, since it's fairly easy to just "decree" certain correspondences by fiat for these purposes, which is probably what happened.  Gharlane (talk) 04:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A quibble re ballot letters 

message: This section needs updating.
Voting in Israel: A Right for All Citizens 2008 The Israel Project and MavenSearch Israel Elections 2009 are dead links. 
"Israeli Politics for Dummies", *Israeli Politics for Dummies doesn't lead to an article by Omri Marcus but to a page with links to recent HuffPost articles. Nor does the search box lead to Israeli Politics for Dummies https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israeli-politics-for-dumm_b_162880 (2009, updated 2011) or 
Israeli Politics for Dummies 2013 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israeli-politics-for-dummies_b_2395115. Mcljlm (talk) 12:27, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: This article says that new polls have been conducted in the PM-Direct election category.
42.109.240.35 (talk) 04:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Netanyahu vs. Lapid
Talk:The Best of Motörhead (video)

message: Found three different release dates on the internet on this one, if anyone finds something definitive, please add in dates wherever applicable. Alf 06:33, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: General
Talk:WSBN

message: Should we merge WMAL-FM and WMAL-AM? AKA Casey Rollins (talk) 04:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  To unify both articles? 

message: According to the FCC's "Call Sign History" page at:
https://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/call_hist.pl?Facility_id=73250&Callsign=WMAL73250
WMAL (AM) became WSBN (AM) on July 1, 2019, with WMAL-FM listed as retaining the FM suffix.Thomas H. White (talk) 21:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call sign change to WSBN
Talk:Cantharellus

message: "is a genus with many delicious and popular edible mushrooms"
Delicious sounds like its from one person's point of view. Could we clear this up please?
:Seems ok to me, but go ahead and rewrite, be bold :-) Jens Nielsen 20:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, they are reknowned for being delicacies, not in the same league as truffles but at least as popular as Boletus edulis I would have thought. Admittedly I have never eaten them meself............Cas Liber 00:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

message: *This is a great image, and I wanted to know where they are actually Chanterelle. Does anyone know? NauticaShades 00:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: A student of mine found a reference to toxicity in chanterelles in "The Great Encyclopedia of Mushrooms" by Jean-Louis Lamaison & Jean-Marie Polese. They say that chanterelles have a small amount of amanitine (an amatoxin), but give no reference. A colleague of mine recalls that the original research leading to this finding was done in the 1960s--I'd really like to find an original reference.  Can you help us find it? 
Nemetona (talk) 01:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edibility 

message: This article should be merged with Chanterelle. No reason to have two articles with similar content for different spellings. --ShanRen (talk) 14:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the merge-template now and clarified that the article Chanterelle is about the speices. Cantharellus cibarius already exist (as a redirect) so moving it needs help from an admin. --Skizziktalk 13:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I created articles for Cantharellus californicus, Cantharellus formosus, and Cantharellus subalbidus, all of which are referred to as "chanterelles" here in western North America and are popular wild edibles.  I agree with the proposal to Keep Cantharellus as a genus-level article and move the article about C. cibarius to the page of the same binomial name.  Chanterelle would then become a disambiguation for various species, including Craterellus, Gomphus floccosus, etc. False morel is an example of disambiguating a common name of multiple species of fungi.  --BlueCanoe (talk) 01:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Chanterelle]] 
Talk:Mookerhei

message: The content was originally an exact duplicate from the William_I_of_Orange article concerning the Battle_of_Mookerheyde.  Since that battle already has its own article, I elected to merge "Mookerhei" in with that article.  The new content from the subsequent edit has been merged in too.  --Alan Au 06:54, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: merge to [[Battle of Mookerheyde]]
Talk:Consciousness-only

message: How is this different from Solipsism?
--
whoever is reading this, go read Yoga Vasistha, or concise yoga vasistha. it is the best!
----
It may not be different from Solipsism, or rather there may be similarities, but Consciousness-only or Mind-only refers specifically to the Buddhist Cittamatra school.  I'm wondering if this should be merged in with Yogacara -- but then I may be unclear on the distinction
Zero sharp 23:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Cittamatra is the summary of the teaching of Yogacara school, in the same way that shunyatavada could be a summary of Madhyamaka. If cittamatra links to Yogacara (as it should), why on earth would its translation not?
:Certainly in the Tibetan parlance the terms are used interchangably. However, recent scholars in the West such as Karl Brunnhlzl have begun to argue that in India there was an important distinction between the two systems, namely that the Cittamatra posited that mind was truly existent while Yogachara did not. In that sense, the Yogachara position is essentially what came to be called "Shentong Madhyamika" in Tibet for political reasons. Sylvain1972 19:31, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: * Anacker, Stefan. Seven Works of Vasubandhu. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 1984.
* Beyer, Steven. The Twenty Verses by Vasubandhu with an anonymous commentary. Typescript.
* Clack, Joseph and Panish, Paul. Remarks on Vasubandhu's "Thirty Verses Proving the Doctrine of Mind Only. Typescript. 1974.
* Epstein, Ronald. Verse Delineating the Eight Consciousnesses. Typescript.
* Epstein, Ronald. Tranformation of Consciousness into Wisdom in the Chinese Consciousness-Only School according to Cheng Wei-Shr Lun. Vajra Bodhi Sea Journal. January-March, 1985.
* Epstein, Ronald. General Pathways of Discrimination/Differentiation. Chart.
* Epstein, Ronald. Interrelation of the Eight Consciousnesses. Chart.
* Epstein, Ronald. Levels of Meditation Prior to Enlightenment. Chart.
* Harvey, Peter. An Introduction to Buddhism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1990.
* Huntington, C.W. The Emptiness of Emptiness. Honolulu: University of Hawaii. 1989.
* Liu, Ming-Wood. Madhyamaka thought in China. Leiden: Brill. 1994.
* Masaaki, Hattori. "Yogacara." The Encyclopedia of Religion. New York: Macmillan. 1987. Vol. 15.
* Nagao, G. M. Madhyamika and Yogacara. Trans. L. S. Kawamura. Albany: State University of New York Press. 1991.
* Sangharakshita, Bhikshu. A Survey of Buddhism. Boulder: Shambhala. 1980.
* Sutton, Florin G. Existence and Enlightenment in the Lankavatara- sutra. Albany: State University of New York Press. 1991.
* Vasubandhu. Shasta on the Door to Understanding the Hundred Dharmas. Trans. Hsuan Hua. Talmage. 1983.
* Verdu, Alfonso. The Philosophy of Buddhism: A "Totalistic" Synthesis. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff. 1981.
* Wood, Thomas. Mind Only. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 1994.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 07:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential sources to iterate article quality
Talk:Trudi Le Caine

message: no consensus on vfd vote per Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Trudi_Le_Caine. --Woohookitty 07:23, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Salvadoran colón

message: To the anonymous most recent contributor: Could you clarify that? I was under the impression that the Salvadoran colón is still in use, but that the US dollar is also legal tender. Has the colón in fact been entirely disposed of? If so, we should remove him from currency templates and lists... Thanks in advance for your input! Nightstallion 07:25, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page should either be El Salvadoran or El Salvadorian. I can't figure out which. www.dictionary.com says El Salvadorian, google has more hits for El Salvadoran. wikipedia has references to both. Is there a definitive source??? Mom2jandk 02:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Merriam-Webster, which I tend to trust most, says "El Salvadoran".  ナイトスタリオン ✉ 14:06, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't it be Salvadoran colón? List of adjectival forms of place names – Zntrip 03:20, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  El Salvadoran/ian 

message: Why was it phased out?
:replaced by the United States dollar. See dollarization. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 23:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The US needed some place to hide all their inflation. Rekutyn (talk) 13:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: These still do not answer the questionEnlil Ninlil (talk) 04:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Phase out

message: The history section cuts off well before the decision to replace the currency with the US Dollar. What is the explanation? Hyperinflation? Instability? Wanted to get rid of the responsibility of maintaining a currency? Was it forced on the country?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.52.69.179 (talk) 14:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Came here expecting an explanation for why it was replaced 

message: 100 Centavos = 1 Peso > Colon Böri (talk) 14:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the past
Talk:Nuclear summer

message: Theoretically, if there was a nuclear summer/winter, would it be posible for some higtly(spelled it wrong) adaptable species or creature(rodents, possibly?),to not only survive harsh condotions of the nuclear wasteland(radiation, powerful doses of UV radiation and so on), but also evolve and/or mutate, in such a way that they would accustome to the aforemantionded hazardous elements, and (over time) create a wole new family of creatures immune (or even symbotic to) radiation, with the possibility to further evolve into intelligent ape/human-like species and maybe even create a culture similar to that of the mankind? 
I know, it sounds like Sci-fi and it´s all whacked, but what do you think about it?
85.207.122.65 22:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's whacked.  It doesn't happen that fast.Mzmadmike (talk) 03:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hpoytetical adaptated species 

message: Less than 70 Ghits for "Jon Roland" "Nuclear Summer."  First two pages of "Nuclear summer" are nothing but band references and pop culture.  No search results on Amazon's first page for the name and book in question.  I'm tagging this for deletion.  It is not an "hypothesis," it's "an idea some kook put in a book a couple of decades ago that has no scientific support or interest whatsoever."Mzmadmike (talk) 03:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a self-published paper, from a person without particular credentials in the field. I've deleted it.   Will Beback  talk   11:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagging for Deletion

message: Seems to me that reasons for whitch this article has been kept from 2005 are still valid tooday. Also it seems to me that there is new form of vandalisam in progress, nominate for deletion and if no one responds in 5 days article is deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.141.37.79 (talk) 23:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep the article 

message: If nuclear summer does happen, it better wipe out mankind or it'll happen again.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.240.127.128 (talk) 07:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  so...
Talk:List of University of California, Santa Barbara people

message: Should there be some criteria for notability established in the lead? I don't have any big issue just wondering. Is this list becoming over inclusive? Only asking the question to seek consensus I don't have a strong opinion. - - MrBill3 (talk) 02:58, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria 

message: People are being added who lack a Wikipedia biographical article and seem to not meet other criteria for inclusion, most recently by Contributor996.  I invite Contributor996 to explain the rationale for doing so in spite of the policies and guidelines in WP:NLIST, WP:BIO, WP:BASIC, and  WP:WTAF. Contributor321 (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Contributor996's most recent inclusion (June 14, 2014) is explained by "The notable alumni have been cross-referenced with multiples sources online through their respective institutions of employment," yet no sources were provided.  Please note that "one of the key policies of Wikipedia is that all article content has to be verifiable. This means that a reliable source must be able to support the material. All quotations and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged must include an inline citation of a source that directly supports the material," according to WP:INTREF.  If you have the sources proving the individuals are notable and UCSB alumni, then please provide them. Contributor321 (talk) 01:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meeting the criteria for inclusion
Talk:Capri Cafaro

message: The follow statement is untrue and slanderous, and I have removed it:
Both Georgetown and Stanford have buildings named Cafaro now.
Oh, please.  Show us any evidence for this outrageous claim.  
----
This "biography" should include some reference to Capri Cafaro's role in bribing Congressman James Traficant.  It seems odd that you would omit it.  It is well known and was covered at length by the local media during her loss to Steve LaTourette.
If you want to include such information, I would suggest you use language that's less POV and back up any accusations with substantiation. Acsenray 19:29, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Food Race

message: "Critics also point out that the most significant population growth is occurring in the Third World, where food is most scarce."  This may be more accurately stated: "Critics also point out that the most significant population growth is occurring in the Third World, where regional food production is lowest."  This is more relevant to the point because it addresses the nature of 'The Food Race' as being a biological process based on food availability not necessarily on local food production.I think that it is important to make a distinction between criticisms of the concept that ecological dynamics can/can not be applied to human beings, and criticisms based on the criteria of those dynamics as applied to humans.  Thank you, L Hamm
OK, done.
Jason Godesky 12:29, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms of The Food Race Formulation
Talk:Metric unit of weight

message: Aren't grams technically a measure of mass, not weight? Ryan 08:22, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
:The gram is a unit of mass not weight, and in the SI system of units the Kg is the basic unit of weight. Only in [[CGS] is the gram a basic unit of mass. Salsb 12:49, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight or Mass?