Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Bush Crimes Commission (2nd nomination)

message: *Without vote stacking, Keep
*With vote stacking Delete
Just keep this in mind when you people rant about how divisive User opposes GWB is, and how innocent User Right Wing Conspiracy is--152.163.100.7 21:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Leave it to "your side" to claim you would have won if not for "vote stacking".  Since 2000, it seems to be the only stategy you have.  Really, it's getting kinda old.--WilliamThweatt 21:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's amusing, although one has to wonder why it was thought necessary to do it in the first place.  Additionally, it's not a matter of two sides, but a contunuum, I think. Шизомби 22:45, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree about the continuum thing. Most Republicans don't agree with everything Bush says or does, and never have. Diddo for Democrats and their candidates. Of course, Republicans tend not to talk about this because they agree with him more than John Kerry (although they have been agreeing with Bush less and less lately). Many foreigners need to understand that we have a two-party system, so in elections, we have to compromise a great deal. I like the Democrat's social policies, but dislike their weak-kneed approach to foreign policy. Of course, there are certain policies that are an exception to my general tendencies.As for vote stealing, technically the Supreme Court fixed the election--not Bush--although the vote was already very close and many people didn't care who won (and thus didn't vote).--Primetime 23:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are using hyperbole when you say "all the delete"s (technically, they're not votes) came from meat (?) puppets.  Mine certainly did not.  And, by the way, Mr. IP 152.163.100.7 (an anonymous AOL IP), I'm logged in...why aren't you?--WilliamThweatt 23:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: cough, cough puppet, meat--205.188.116.8 23:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All you have to do is check my User Contribution History, my anonymous friend, which I have because I am logged in and can be held accountable to my comments, unlike yourself.--WilliamThweatt 01:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 points

message: :The following is a quotePlease do not modify it.
===Bush Crimes Commission===
You are invited to vote in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush Crimes Commission (2nd nomination)  -- thanks for voting, and I would encourage you to activate like-minded people to participate as well.  Cut and paste this invitation if you're so inclined.  Cheers.  Morton devonshire 23:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of spam.  Please do not modify it.
*If you recieved the above notice, then came here and voted delete, you are a meatpuppet, luckily this isn't an issue as meatpuppet votes actually count, at least those that come from RUs count anyway, the 2 or 3 blocked proxies that were also asked to vote, their votes don't count anymore than mine--205.188.116.8 23:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: You are invited to vote in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush Crimes Commission (2nd nomination)  -- thanks for voting, and I would encourage you to activate like-minded people to participate as well.  Cut and paste this invitation if you're so inclined.  Cheers.  Morton devonshire 23:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of spam.  Please do not modify it.</div>
*If you recieved the above notice, then came here and voted delete, you are a meatpuppet, luckily this isn't an issue as meatpuppet votes actually count, at least those that come from RUs count anyway, the 2 or 3 blocked proxies that were also asked to vote, their votes don't count anymore than mine--205.188.116.8 23:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bush Crimes Commission