lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hedonism Resorts

message: Westmoreland is on the south side of the island, on the west half.  Both resorts are described here as being in Westmoreland yet neither dot is in Westmoreland.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:EA00:107:3802:7DC3:C5F3:3564:16F7 (talk) 19:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps are both wrong 

message: Robert 00:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 

message: I think that Hedonism provided the first template for a type of resort that is growing in popularity. I'm not personally going to be able to find the reliable sources to make the case for Hedonism being a historically important and influential resort, but I think the case could be made fairly strongly. With that potential, I think deleting the article would be a mistake. ike9898 (talk) 23:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 

message: I would tend to agree that the page could be allowed to stay up even with the closing of Hedo III, however it needs significant editing to make it worthy of an encyclopedic entry.  There needs to be more content on its history and cultural significance or its impact on other resorts or sociological import since its creation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohannVanbeek (talk • contribs) 14:32, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hedonism resorts (II and the now closed III) as a cultural/historical site 

message: Right now there are two Hedonism Resorts pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism_Resorts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism_II
The second is titled Hedonism Resorts and indicates it is a redirect from Hedonism II. However, the content of the second page is not the same as the first. Recent edits in the first page are not reflected in the second page. There appears to be a problem with the redirect system. 35.9.35.242 (talk) 15:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misdirection error 
Talk:Telep

message: * http://www.helsinki.org.yu/report_text.php?idteksta=823&lang=sr
Quote: "Telep, once a Hungarian borough of Novi Sad (and currently a borough heavily populated by refugees from Bosnia and Croatia)"
So, Hungarians were majority in the settlement, but they are not now. Soon, the latest issue of Novi Sad Encyclopaedia will be published with articles beginning with letter "t", so I will have official statistics then. PANONIAN (talk) 00:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am still waiting for latest issue of "Enciklopedija Novog Sada", which will contain article about Telep. I hope it will provide demographics too. PANONIAN (talk) 00:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnic majority
Talk:Railways on the West Coast of Tasmania

message: Couple of suggestions.
I wonder if the Comstock Tramway issue would be better resolved by having:
* Comstock Tramway, operating out of Zeehan
* Comstock Tramway, built but never used out of the Linda Valley
Secondly, how about including the reopening as tourist railways in the timelien section? :) Ambi 00:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier comments

message: This article had been merged into a larger scope Tasmanian rail transport articel - I have reverted that, and will use some recently acquired information that will considerable expand the article to make such a merge impractical - any further comment about the style or format here will be accepted in good faith User:JarrahTree 09:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: De-merge

message: Italicise is correct MOS - not bolding - thanks User:JarrahTree 22:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bolding refs
Talk:Hasselt

message: Labas nor lietuvis 79.234.164.243 (talk) 06:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labas noriu
Talk:Claudio Ciborra

message: I have added some substantive material to this "stub" hopefully others will now follow suit and add more to it. Come on - where are Claudio's students????? Get writing. There is very little (nothing?)on the whole of Wikipedia on the Social Study of Information Systems, yet this is a field of great relevance and increasing importance in our technology driven world. It should also be of interest to Wikipedians, many of whom are interested in technology and its social implications. ISmad 16:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Robert 00:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 
Talk:Financial District, Boston

message: This article repeats information found on other pages.
* Points of interest can go in Sites of interest in Boston
* Companies can go in Boston section Economy
* Buildings and proposed buildings are already mentioned on List of tallest buildings in Boston. Tylr00 (talk) 12:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Overlap is normal. There is no need to gut this article. It would be unhelpful to ask the reader to hunt through three other articles for the relevant information already concentrated here. Hertz1888 (talk) 14:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant information?
Talk:WXRV

message: I thought I read somewhere that WXRV was licenced to Northeast Broadcasting - therefore no independent ownership - I saw on their website at one time. I thought "Independent Radio" referred to independent label/band music. Can someone clarify? Steven312 00:20, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Independent
Talk:Battle of Sorauren

message: :In the nearby of Maya, a.k.a. Amayur (Basque script: Amaiur). The place belongs to Baztan (municipality).
:::"http://www.peninsularwar.org/maya.htm"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.2.56 (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maya Ridge
Talk:Battle of Ramnagar

message: Hernon is a UK lobby correspondent who has compiled various narratives into three books, published as a compilation titled Britain's Forgotten Wars. I'm guessing this is from Blood in the Sand. Amazon does allow limited searching of this book and that shows 2 mentikons of Ramnagagar, but I'm not sure how that matches the citation. So, what we need at the very least is some quotes from the book making it clear who wrote them. But note that these are primary sources, and we normally want secondary sources for such material, see WP:WPNOTRS. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 15:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see what a book's web presence has to do with Wikipedia. It is a printed source, obtainable from a book store or library. However, I won't get into a sterile edit war. However, my major point is that you have deleted citations while leaving intact the facts they supported. Since the article is now in need of other cites to prop up the narrative, or the uncited facts should be trimmed leaving the article little more than a stub, I would argue that your action has not improved the article; indeed, the opposite. What do you propose to do to restore it? HLGallon (talk) 00:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't addressed anything I wrote. If in fact you can't find clearly reliable sources then maybe it should be removed. Your call. Dougweller (talk) 10:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hernon
Talk:Battle of Claremore Mound

message: I propose that the information in the existing Claremore Mound article page be moved to the existing Battle of Claremore Mound article, with the latter, with the latter being the survivor. Both concern the same geographical feature, and the battle is the main reason that Claremore Mound is notable. Once merged, the result would be a more comprehensive and more highly rated article.
Any interested editor is encouraged to reply on the [[Talk:Claremore Mound page.Bruin2 (talk) 03:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:War of Chioggia

message: This article is in bad shape. It is mostly background and the little that is contained about the war itself is introductory and appears with more detail at the article Venetian-Genoese War. This article needs translation help from the foreign language Wikis, especially the Italian. Srnec 04:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great work! Srnec 23:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad article
Talk:Battle of Arcis sur Aube

message: Battle of Arcis sur Aube should be merged with Battle of Arcis-sur-Aube, sources indicate that Arcis-sur-Aube is the correct name. --Bryson 20:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Articles 

message: This is a duplicate article. Also the name should be “Battle of Arcis-sur-Aube” See, Battle of Arcis-sur-Aube.--Bryson 19:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for deletion request
Talk:Battle of Hyderabad

message: Peer Review: Battle of Hyderabad
I would like to start out by saying the structure of the article looks really good. The first thing I noticed was the headings, which make things easier for everyone involved. The lead paragraph has all the needed information that a reader needs to identify exactly what they are reading about. The only difference I would make on the structure, is to add another space between paragraphs so they are easier to tell apart and to keep them from looking like they are running into each other. A big block of words is kind of intimidating to read. You did a great job of staying on topic in the article. Everything seems well done and accurate. There are a couple spots that could maybe use another reference or two, it wouldn’t hurt to go through everything again and just look carefully at where you think another one could be added. You were very thorough in the article, going over a great deal of information and detail relevant to the topic. I think you did a really good job on the article. I can’t really point out much to change, and what I could see that needed to be changed I have told you. You did a great job, I am excited to see the final article!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Molenchuk (talk • contribs) 03:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 208 Peer Review 

message: "The Scinde Horse and 3rd Bombay Light Cavalry made a move to attack the left wing of the British troops"
This phrase doesn't make sense. What meaning is intended?
JF42 (talk) 08:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   a move to attack the left wing of the British troops
Talk:Ufouria: The Saga

message: Needs an actual acceptable translation, preferably cited directly from the Japanese manual; current "story" listed from this region makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.148.83 (talk) 02:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, that's a direct (and probably google-) translation from the Japanese manual, which is why it's so ugly. I'll post an updated one -- one that isn't machine-translated -- when I have time.--96.250.240.119 (talk) 05:00, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Story

message: Ive seen reference to some controversy related to the Nintendo Power magazine, in relation to this game. What was this, and perhaps it could be discussed in the article? Dxco 17:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nintendo Power 

message: Highly recommend changing 'rare' in the first paragraph to 'in demand'. When something is sought after, it has higher demand, not increased rarity. Games do not become more or less rare, they are as rare as they always are. Demand is what changes. As it is, many people do not understand the concept of rarity and confuse it with demand so a statement like this needs to be changed to not perpetuate the fallacy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.138.230 (talk) 13:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rarity

message: As per the comment above. The word rare has been overused and misunderstood in the world of game collecting that it has no value anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.146.120 (talk) 00:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rare Changed
Talk:Battles of El Bruch

message: Can someone revert all the silly changes of bruch to bruh since 20:32, 15 February 2020, specifically this set of changes needs to be reverted, or put another way every edit since the revision by  to present, excepting those of , thanks. 74.73.230.72 (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I took care of it.  Feel free to ping me if I missed anything.  Thanks for the notification. S0091 (talk) 06:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi protected edit request
Talk:Battle of Orthez

message: Using Gastin Bodart's figures is causing confusion. Some of the figures he uses are inflated & do not correspond with the losses already listed in the article. There is already a breakdown in numbers and losses here: Orthez 1814 order of battle. Is there any reason why we should use Bodart and does he have a more comprehensive breakdown? Eastfarthingan (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Bodart
Talk:Capture of HMS Epervier

message: Per MOS:JOBTITLES, "Offices, titles, and positions ... are common nouns and therefore should be in lower case when used generically". They are capitalized only "When followed by a person's name to form a title, i.e., when they can be considered to have become part of the name" or "When a title is used to refer to a specific and obvious person as a substitute for their name". The usage in this article is neither. This is similar to "He is best known as the captain of the RMS Titanic" in Edward Smith's article. Whether people end up in a position through birth, appointment, election, conscription or otherwise, the position gets lower case unless it is a part of a person's name or takes the place of their name. The article does not even mention the lieutenant's name, so it is clearly just a position. Please restore my edits to this article and to Capture of HMS Cyane and HMS Levant. I also made corrections to the punctuation, and it would be good not to throw the baby out with the bath water. You could have changed just the capitalization without removing the commas I added. Chris the speller yack 22:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You might also undo your change to Robert Heriot Barclay. Chris the speller yack 23:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Hanjin Shipping

message: The company has 40 years of history and had a considerable share of the international shipping market, yet the article leans heavily towards the topic of bankruptcy, as if it's the only thing it should be notable for. This really needs to be addressed, or I'm hard-pressed to take this article seriously. - 219.92.202.195 (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy bias towards bankruptcy 

message: A table-list of ships from wayback machine.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110518220331/http://www.hanjin.com/en/company/vessel/vessel.jsp  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkouklis(2) (talk • contribs) 15:19, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No history or list of ships?
Talk:Battle of Cañada

message: that supports that there were Apaches involved here.  If I do not find one I will remove all reference to them in the article. Please feel free to put one forward,  einar aka Carptrash (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not found a reference that places the Apaches at this battle, so am removing them.  Feel free to find a reference and put them back. Carptrash (talk) 21:05, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am looking for a reference
Talk:Battle of Warsaw (1831)

message: === Schlacht von Praga 1831 ===
Im Novemberaufstand von 1830 war Praga am 6. und 7. September 1831 erneut Schauplatz einer Schlacht. Praga wurde im Rahmen der Verteidigung Warschaus durch General Henryk Dembiński von Jan Pawel Lelewel gegen die russische Übermacht unter Feldmarschall Graf Iwan Fjodorowitsch Paskewitsch (1782-1856) verteidigt. Die Polen mussten am 8. September 1831 erneut gegenüber der erdrückenden russisschen Übermacht kapitulieren, die anschließend in Warschau eindrang. Die revolutionäre Armee wurde vollständig zerstreut, die Überlebenden flohen ins Ausland, wo sie teils eine bedeutende Rolle in den revolutionären Bewegungen Westeuropas spielten. Paskewitsch, vom Kaiser zum Fürsten von Warschau erhoben und zum Statthalter von Polen ernannt, begann die Russifizierung des Landes. Er vollzog am 26. Februar 1832 das Organische Statut, das Polen mit Russland vereinigte.--Fifat 23:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German description of the battle (from [[:de:Praga (Warschau)]] 

message: Im Novemberaufstand von 1830 war Praga am 6. und 7. September 1831 erneut Schauplatz einer Schlacht. Praga wurde im Rahmen der Verteidigung Warschaus durch General Henryk Dembiński von Jan Pawel Lelewel gegen die russische Übermacht unter Feldmarschall Graf Iwan Fjodorowitsch Paskewitsch (1782-1856) verteidigt. Die Polen mussten am 8. September 1831 erneut gegenüber der erdrückenden russisschen Übermacht kapitulieren, die anschließend in Warschau eindrang. Die revolutionäre Armee wurde vollständig zerstreut, die Überlebenden flohen ins Ausland, wo sie teils eine bedeutende Rolle in den revolutionären Bewegungen Westeuropas spielten. Paskewitsch, vom Kaiser zum Fürsten von Warschau erhoben und zum Statthalter von Polen ernannt, begann die Russifizierung des Landes. Er vollzog am 26. Februar 1832 das Organische Statut, das Polen mit Russland vereinigte.--Fifat 23:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schlacht von Praga 1831 

message: Close, but still needs more citations - some paragraphs are unreferenced. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article may be GA-ready now. I'll see if I can review it myself if I have the time. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks mate :) //Halibutt 10:36, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review
Talk:Operation Stonewall

message: The article initially said that there were Czech & Slovak air units.
I have changed this to Czechoslovak because the air units were NOT divided into separate Czech and Slovak units. The nation these airmen came from was Czechoslovakia. I understand NOW that nation has been divided into two. And even under German occupation a separate Slovak nation was formed.
Montalban (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czech & Slovak 

message: Aftermath parachuted in from Battle of the Bay of Biscay.Keith-264 (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, the nations involved probably should all be mentioned in the Lead or early in body of article if it makes sense.  Or move the Order of battle list up instead. -Fnlayson (talk) 23:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ta, I'm still working on the narrative and hope to finish it today. The lead, infobox and the OoB await....Regards Keith-264 (talk) 10:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

text: * Sure, and keep up the good work.  Regards, -Fnlayson (talk) 14:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

text: That's some impressive work done here in the last week! I'm not very familiar with this operation, so off the top of my head, I'd think some of the standard sources on the BofA (like Blair in the further reading - Milner may have details, etc.). I know Sturmvogel wrote a couple of articles on the French destroyers that were involved - Jordan & Moulin may be useful (cited in those articles - I don't have a copy, but he does). Forsyth's Shadow over the Atlantic and Brown's Eagles Over the Sea will probably help with Luftwaffe stuff. I'd think Brice's Axis Blockade Runners of World War II would be useful. Parsecboy (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks I'll look into them tonight, You're not so bad yourself ;O) Regards Keith-264 (talk) 16:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

text:  Checked Orsono-Osono and made sure all were spelled Osono, checked Alsterufer for 'Alsterufer' and changed from 'A' to A; auto-edded again and dupe wl. checked. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion and revision
Talk:Battle of La Rothière

message: The box calls this battle a "French strategic victory". The article contains nothing that justifies or explains that claim. Can somebody with more knowledge - idealy the one who added this line into the infobox - expand the article so that it explains why or how this can be seen as a French victory? If nothing shows up I think its justified to remove that line.  ASchudak (talk) 20:44, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A "French strategic victory"?
Talk:Battle of Fère-Champenoise

message: I know nothing about this battle, but the title may be spelled wrong. There is a town called Fère-Champenoise in the Marne département, 30 km southwest of Châlons-en-Champagne. Markussep 19:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Please see the June 2016 version of this article. The Forces section shows that the contributions of the Allies were Austria (3,700), Württemberg (2,000) and Prussia (800). But the vast majority of the 26,400 Allied cavalry were Russians. Djmaschek (talk) 15:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Forces
Talk:Battle of Magango

message: Can the authors of this posting check their facts
The name of the battle is "Battle of Maqongqo Hills"
29th January 1840
The Wiki location for this battle is also incorrect
The Battle took place near the present day stock sale yards at Candover west of Mkuze in North Eastern KZN
Here are the references
1.)  Andrew Dumminy Bill Guest    Natal and Zululand from Earliest times to 1910  UNP Press 1989 Pages 93 . 122
2.)  John LaBand   Rope of Sand 1995 Jonathan Ball  Pages 116 -118
3.)  Peter Becker  Rule of Fear 1972  Longmans Green Page 249
4.)  C.T. Binns   The Last Zulu King  1963  Longmans Green  Page 20
:The above comment was posted by User:41.247.84.56 in May 2009 on the main article, and I moved it here. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 19:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Iganie

message: * Ensured that this article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. 
* This article would benefit from:  expansion, sections (Prelude, The battle, Aftermath), in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]]
Talk:LGBT rights in Liechtenstein

message: Do we have the name of the "local political party"? If so, can we insert it?
Kai 00:33, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On 16 March 2011 parliament in Liechtenstein approved in second reading civil unions.
* Schweizer Fernsehen:Liechtenstein Ja zur Homo-Ehe 92.252.112.31 (talk) 14:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil unions, 2011
Talk:List of foreign films shot in Morocco

message: I believe this article was created because we needed to a fork of Culture of Morocco#Cinema. The idea was that this is to be a list of foreign films shot in Morocco. I am moving this article to List of foreign movies shot in Morocco. Cheers -- Svest 00:34, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: Does this mean foreign to Hollywood, foreign to the Moroccan movie industry, etc.?  Any film can be considered "foreign" to someone.
:I'd say films filmed in Morroco but are not Moroccan films. --BillPP (talk) 12:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Define foreign

message: Where is this place? http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=WLgTuvWCAsM&NR=1 Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=WLgTuvWCAsM&NR=1
Talk:Siege of Kars

message: The article gives little insight as to what really happened there. It is full of Turkish bias. Should be rewritten. --Ghirla -трёп- 16:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "cracks knuckles" Will try. --Laserbeamcrossfire 05:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't bother. I have rewritten the article since then. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've actually got an article here from Military History that'll add some more detail about the siege and the battle. Want me to go ahead and add in if I can? --Laserbeamcrossfire 07:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Soviethistorian (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Imperial Russian History