lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mylor, Cornwall

message: I would suggest that the pages Mylor, Cornwall and Mylor Bridge actually describe the same place. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't a merge be in order (but to which title???) ROxBo 21:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Probus, Cornwall

message: Introduction
The link to St Probus is a link to 'Martyrs Tarachus, Andronicus, and Probus at Tarsus, in Cilicia,' (12 October), which is not the right Probus.  The town of Probus is dedicated to Sts Probus and Grace, a missionary husband and wife, whose feast day is 5 July. SrLoco (talk) 08:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Ruan Lanihorne

message: Should be Ruan Lanihorne but I don't know how to make the change.Abtract 21:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting that! I have moved it to the right page - yo make a page move, click on the 'move' tab at the top of the page you want to move, and then fill in the new page name, and the reason for the move in the boxes which will appear on screen. DuncanHill 23:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: thanksAbtract 00:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St Newlyn East

message: According to this article the mine closed in 1881. In the Cornishman (9 February 1882, page 5) samples of silver-lead ore was found in an (estimated) 600 fathom long lode. But, there is a mining share list on the same page which does not list East Wheal Rose or Wheal Rose.Jowaninpensans (talk) 17:36, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Further down the page a 90-inch engine is being built as is a 100-inch.Jowaninpensans (talk) 17:45, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: East Wheal Rose

message: smalljim, all of the articles that you changed were Cornwall UK, you changed them all to add in England, who is the vandal? The Originnal author put Cornwall UK, so why change an original work? 85.10.119.182 (talk) 11:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:List of Terminator video games

message: All these articles are stubs. They are essentially about the same subject - Terminator film licence games - and should have started on their parent article page. 
According to Wikipedia guidelines fictional topics should generally work out as such:-
1) The main article is formed (in this case the film article) with section on games.
2) The games section cannot hold the expanding section
3) A games article is formed
4) Certain games sections grow too large and expand into their own article (as long as they have enough real world information). This process is ignored too often, it should be utilized here. 
Examples of film franchise video games stubs in the same article: 
*Ghostbusters (franchise)#Video games
*Batman computer and video games --Nreive (talk) 14:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: This article has been identified as containing an excessive quantity of non-free content. Per the Foundation's requirement to keep non-free media use minimal, and per Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria #3, the non-free images on this article have been removed. Please note: 
*The presence of a fair use rationale for this article on an image description page does not make it acceptable for a given use. 
*Blanket restoration of the non-free images that have been removed can and most likely will be reverted, with subsequent reporting action possible. 
*If some restoration is desired, careful consideration of exactly what non-free media to use must be made, paying special attention to WP:NFCC #1 and #8. In most cases non-free media needs to be tied directly to the prose of the article, most preferably with inline citations tying the discussion to secondary sources regarding the image per Wikipedia:Verifiability. 
If this is a list type article, please read the WP:NFLISTS guideline. If you wish to dispute this removal, it may be helpful to read WP:OVERUSE, as it answers a number of typical questions and responses to removals such as this. If after reading these, you still feel there is grounds for restoration of most or all of the media that have been removed, please post to Wikipedia talk:Non-free content.  ΔT The only constant 01:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of non-free images on this article
Talk:Wolf's Head

message: SLY111: Need to detail better the circumstances surrounding the founding of WHS. After another review of the Phelps Association Trust papers at Sterling Memorial Library, Yale University, in large part to reread THE FOUNDING OF WOLF'S HEAD by John Williams Andrews, and a review of the chapter on WHS in FLESHING OUT SKULL AND BONES by Kris Millegan, I'll rewrite the opening. I'm hopeful three photographs will be added associated with the "rewrite"....27 Nov 06
SLY111: WHS saved the society system at Yale, therefore creating the Yale that benefits the world today. Undergraduate Yalies work, for sure, but their steps are animated, consciously or unconsciously, by the opportunity of a tap to a secret society. This legacy sustains. This training is remarkable for the world beyond New Haven, as others (non-Yalies) would attest, and as Yalies would agree. But more importantly, the world beyond Yale has benefitted mightily from the society system. Yalies are prepared to do well the work of the world....3 Nov 06
:Perhaps the above note best moved to Talk:Wolf's Head (secret society)? --doncram (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: a note
Talk:The Illearth War

message: Can someone please explain how to provide secondary sources for this work of fiction?
As far as I can see, the contents of the book are a product of the author's imagination and unless he is guilty of plagiarism, there can be no secondary source to cite.
 93.155.221.246 (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary sources 

message: The Lord of the Rings has many books written by many authors of repute that expanded the world that J.R.R. Tolkien created. This would be a secondary source for that series. Unfortunately, there is no rich secondary resource that exists for The Thomas Covenant series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.88.117 (talk) 18:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to question
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Moon task force

message: Of possible interest to task force members, a new navbox is available at Template:Lunar landers (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 06:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lunar landers navbox 

message: Hello, introducing a barnstar for this project. Was trying to add it to the page, but the page-layout is abit different from other project pages.
* 
		The Moon Barnstar
		
 Jerium (talk) 18:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barnstar 

message: * list of mountains on the Moon by height ==> list of mountains on the Moon
see also ../Mars task force#merge proposal — Arlo James Barnes 23:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal 

message: *  the information can be in a single sortable table so why have a separate 'by height' article? Praemonitus (talk) 00:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  discussion 

message: Taskforce members may be interested in the discussion at Talk:IM-1#Proposed_merge_of_EagleCam_into_IM-1 (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk)
: latest subsection is talk:IM-1#Proposed merge discussion section 4, nine days ago. Arlo James Barnes 12:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposed for [[EagleCam]] 

message: * recommend: move list of lunar features ==> index of lunar features.
** reasoning: using WP:INDICES would emphasize that the scope is providing pointers to other, more specific lists.
** see also: outline of the Moon#Characteristics of the Moon (WP:OUTLINE).
=== Discussion ===
* , per reasoning above. Arlo James Barnes 13:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  move proposal 

message: * , per reasoning above. Arlo James Barnes 13:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:Johannes Althusius

message: What is this "new controversy" about?  Could some one provide a few more details, perhaps a link to this new edition? (I would guess it's the first reference listed, but that should be made explicit.)
It appears there have been other English editions, in 1932 and 1964.  Out of print, for sure, but often found in used-book stores, so it might be an assistance to the interested reader to reference them.
By the way, Sabine (A History of Political Thought) has several pages on Althusius (pp387-390, 4th ed.) which could be the basis of a short section about his work.  - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 19:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions.
Talk:Johannes Nikolaus Tetens

message: In the "Biography" section, the following words occur: "...this polygraphic formation period...." Shouldn’t this be "...this polymathic formation period...."? Tetens was a polymath because he was learned in many areas of knowledge.Lestrade (talk) 15:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Multi-learned
Talk:Johannes Plavius

message: I added  because of the sentence Some scholars believe, however, that Plavius was born in Danzig, Prussia (now Gdańsk, Poland).  We need these scholars named, and cited if we are to remove this weasel warning. --Jadger 00:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The idea that he was born in Danzig seems to be outdated . Anyway, as the town is frequent target of certain edit warriors, I'll remove the sentence, and the weasel tag. -- Matthead discuß!     O       01:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel words
Talk:John Scotus (bishop of Mecklenburg)

message: Information on this article (that he was sacrificed to the pagan god Radegast conflicts with that page (for Radegast) which says that people of the town then known as "Radegast" sacrificed him to one of two other pagan gods.
This article cites a blog which in turn cites the book "A History of Pagan Europe" (Prudence Jones / Nigel Pennick), whereas the article on Radegast seems to cite a period source, but I don't have access to either so I don't know which is correct.
I'm relatively new to this so I don't know if someone can find which is more likely to be true, or should I edit both articles to include both possibilities?
Strumphs (talk) 15:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacrificed to whom? 

message: See Talk:John the Scot (bishop)#Requested move. Srnec (talk) 00:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Johannes Theodor Baargeld

message: ------------
This Wikipedia list below is a copy of the inaccurate Category People from Szczecin. This flawed list states a large number of people, who were not born in Szczecin and were not People by city in Poland, as it is claimed in the category below. Trying to correct this, gets reverted , , , ,  and so on
People at Wikipedia deliberately put out untrue information and are trying to deceive
That needs to be corrected and stopped.
---  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.133.68.129 (talk) 06:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Johannes Widmann

message: Is there any way this article can be expanded? 207.62.186.233 (talk) 15:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How deliciously obscure... 

message: Afaik it`s not completely clear if he actually had invented them, but they did appear for the first time in his book in printed form. 62.178.137.216 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 15:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  addition and subtraction-sign
Talk:Manjar blanco

message: After doing a little research on the Internet I reorganized and expanded this article for clarity. If anybody disagrees with these changes please fee free to correct. --Mcorazao 14:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganization

message: This article needs a reorganization. It is about two very different things, on one hand an European dish called "manjar blanco" in Spanish, that sould be fusioned with "blancmanger", who is not a French dish but Catalan in origin and after spreaded in other countries in Europe, as France, Great Britain, etc. So blancmanger, in English, blancmamnge, is too French-centered, and a fallacy, since it does not include visions of Spain or UK, for example, where it is even today very typical. On the other hand it is about an American topping called only in some countries, and in Spanish, not in English, "manjar blanco", while it is called in the others "dulce de leche". It is nonsense that in English they must be together when the only thing in common is the name, only in some countries where only one of them are known and in a foreigner language, in Spanish, not in English. More than that, even in wikipedia in Spanish they are in different articles.--Slastic (talk) 08:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-reorganization

message: It's not true that the name manjar blanco is used in Argentina. Dulce de leche is the name used in Argentina and Uruguay.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.139.13.252 (talk) 02:00, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manjar blanco is known as dulce de leche in Argentina 
Talk:Lancaster Girls' Grammar School

message: Firstly, for grammar school students who should know better, the spelling is Margaret. I am surprised nobody managed to spot this rather amusing entry on the list of previous headmistresses. It managed to stay here for 2 months. Could people please stop vandalising this article as it may be blocked from future edits. Pinster2001 15:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Margret Thatcher

message: There must be some.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.152.249.11 (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there no notable former pupils? 

message: I've reformatted the text so that the lyrics to the school song show up properly, I also removed POV. I came here from the Article of Lancaster where it's included in the points of interest. Which somehow it does not seem to be ;) 178.142.80.200 (talk) 20:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:Public Prosecutor General (Poland)

message: From  Attorney General of the Republic of Poland to Public Prosecutor General. I was asking a sworn translator about the proper terminology, and she told me that all modern official documents used the PPG format (prokurator being translated in EU as public prosecutor); and that Attorney General is am americanization.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have spoken to people involved in the position itself and Public Prosecutor General should be changed into Attorney General. And its not a mistacke but a correct terminology. So this should be changed. Lemonidess (talk) 11:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Name changed
Talk:Audit Commission (Hong Kong)

message: Ammends and edits welcomed --Larryau 15:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: User:Citobun: Noted that you reverted my edits to the article. Given that your edit summary "Whitewashing" is quite vague, I am not sure which part of the edit you object to specifically. 
I invite you to clarify this so we may have a discussion on how we can refine the edit.
Thank you Carter00000 (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of Edit
Talk:William Lyman Underwood

message: The company was not the Underwood Canning Company as far as I know, it was the William Underwood Company. However someone made a page for the company with that name and I don't know how to correct it, so the link has to stay that way I guess unless some wiki-person fixes it. 72.229.151.216 16:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Juthwara

message: Her traditional emblem is a cream cheese? (wtf?) Paul 15:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A soft cheese, like brie. Walgamanus 16:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cheese

message: Carried her own head?
"Bana felt her underclothes and found them moist, whereupon he immediately struck off her head. A spring of water appeared at the spot. Juthwara then carried her head back to the church."
So, her head was struck off and then a well sprung up and then, beheaded and assumingly then very dead, she carried back her own head to a church?  This makes no sense at all so I just wondered if the text was actually entered correctly here or if there had been some error.
:It's called a miracle. This particular miracle was very common amongst holy cephalophores. Walgamanus 21:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Head
Talk:Harold T. Wilkins

message: He aldo wrote Treasure Hunting, Missing Hidden Treasures, Pirate Treasures, Captain Kidd and His Skeleton Island under the publisher of Bruce Humphries, Inc. Boston.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.170.53.195 (talk) 10:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harold T. Wilkins 

message: At minimum, a citation to a periodical needs to include the article title and author, as well as the publication's name and publication date. Citations like "World science review, Intelligence Digest Service, 1956, p. 39" are essentially worthless from a WP:Verifiability point of view. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 12:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: The article makes reference to 'the fictitious Andrew Lang disappearance' but there is nothing on AL's page to which this relates. Some clarification is needed on one or other page. Jackiespeel (talk) 09:10, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: the IP is correct and I've changed it. Doug Weller talk 16:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew Lang
Talk:Westlake Featherduster

message: I have tagged this article for deletion.  The primary reason is a lack of verifiability.  Please see WP:V for a complete explanation of this concept.  Essentially, this article cannot be in this encyclopedia because while the facts laid out in the article (such as staff roster, etc) have not been published elsewhere independent of the Featherduster (and therefore are the result of original research).  Furthermore Wikipedia precedents state that school clubs are not notable.  -Seidenstud 15:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion
Talk:Rød snø

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 15:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Why is this article called Rød Snø (Norwegian Bokmål) when the on-screen title was Röd Snö (Swedish)? Nidator 10:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series title?
Talk:Aki

message: "Aki" is the family name in India.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.18.18.80 (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of the word 
Talk:Katie King (spirit)

message: It seems rather odd to have Katie King (spirit) as the title and Florence Cook as the redirect.  Since Cook indisputably existed and there is a signficant literature about her, while King is discussed only as an emanation of Cook, it seems that Florence Cook is the appropriate subject of the article.  Cusop Dingle (talk) 21:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason is that Katie appeared for others, too--not just Florence Cook (it's in the article).--Anthon.Eff (talk) 02:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I should have written "mainly" rather than "only".  Cusop Dingle (talk) 07:34, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: i am native french speaker , but regardless browse usually more english version of articles because in most cases it seems way more complete. this seems to be the only time i recall the english version being shorter than the french one, if u take of the equation every obvious case where the french version would be more complete (whatever french topic..).
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_Cook  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.51.20.36 (talk) 01:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  quality of the article compared to the french one
Talk:Maisy Mouse

message: Both British English and American English spellings were used in the book names (colour vs favorite).  As the author, Lucy Cousins, is British, I have put them all to the British English spellings.  Monique34 15:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are you sure?  I seem to remember the name Brian Greene for the narrator, and theme song by the Umbilical Brothers.  Inconveniently enough, there's no info on Noggin.com or IMDB.com. --204.246.229.216 20:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neil Morrissey? 
Talk:Santarém District

message: In 1998, there was a referendum on regionalization in Portugal (about the creation of new administrative regions) which was rejected in 1998. Neither were any EU statistical regions approved, nor they were recognized by the people who had the word according to the 1998 referendum. Therefore, the NUTS regions (apart from Azores and Madeira which are autonomous regions and apart from Algarve, which matches the Faro District) should not be considered as Portuguese subregions, since they were only created and redrawn for statistical purposes.
I'd suggest that some sort of compromise could be made concerning to some particular regions, specially concerning to Ribatejo, since the NUTS II classification was made only for statistical purposes (and were redrawn, for those purposes, namely not to let some parts of the former NUTS II region of Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (Ribatejo and the North side of Estremadura) to be affected in relation to the allocation EU funds.
Besides that everyone in Portugal calls the territory roughly corresponding to the {Santarém District) as Ribatejo, not Alentejo (apart from Ponte de Sôr, which is in another district and sometimes is considered to be in Ribatejo though most of the times is considered to be in Alentejo. There are plenty of sites that show that Alentejo doesn't include Ribatejo, like the following ones: , ,  (published by the Portuguese Government itself), , etc. (note: I only indicated maps published after the redrawing of the NUTS II region in 2011).
The other regions are also commonly called by their traditional names, but in a broader sense there are indeed the North, Center, Alentejo (this one not with the borders defined by NUTS II) and Algarve regions, along with the Metropolitan area of Lisbon, which corresponds to the NUTS II region of Lisbon. I don't disagree, at all, that the NUTS II and NUTS III are included in the location of the places, though I'd prefer that the proper context would be provided and the traditional regions would be added to the description (preferably those established in 1936), with an explanation that those regions are not administrative (since their administrative functions were later transfered to the districts), but they're historical and cultural regions, with their designations being broadly used in Portugal (unlike many of the NUTS regions). Thanks a lot the attention of the users who may wish to participate in this discussion. Greetings!
P.S.: Portuguese editors (and particularly from Ribatejo are very welcome to this discussion, since it's an issue that concerns to Portugal and to Ribatejo.Viet-hoian1 (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subregions of Portugal (Ribatejo and others) 