lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John "Pondoro" Taylor

message: From what I gather this man was a poacher, an illegal hunter, this does not seem to be mentioned in the article, and I find that it portrays him as more knowledgable than he actually may be due to him drawing conclusions from purely anecdotal data that is, in fact, contradictary to scientific trials done by people such as Martin Fackler.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.70.47.156 (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can point to some reliable sources then it should be added to the article. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poacher? 
Talk:Emperor Shun

message: Sources say, (and here too it is said) Shun ruled 50 years (here it says beyond the death of Yao). In whose calendar and whose math! Age 53 plus 50 years of rule and it says he dies at age 100. (53 +50 =100) Am I breaking Wiki-Pedia rules again if I conclude that 53 +50 is 103?  Then it says at 30 he was given rule, to rule 30 years with Yao, (making him 60 if I am allowed by Wiki-Pedia rule to conclude 30 +30 =60) when it says he then ruled 50 years (60 +50 =110), not 100 as stated. Can someone clarify this without breaking the Wiki-Pedia TOS of A source +B source = C your own conclusion? Other sources say Yao ruled 2333-2233bc and Shun 2233-2183bc.
:The main 3 sources are Bamboo Annals, the Canon of Shun, and Shiji.  Bamboo Annals say Yao abdicated the throne entirely to Shun in his 73rd year, living in retirement for another 28 years. Shun had already ruled with Yao as crown prince for 3 years, then ruled in his own right for another 50 years. Canon of Shun says "In the thirtieth year of his age, Shun was called to employment. Thirty years he was on the throne (with Yao). Fifty years afterwards he went on high and died.". The sources don't always agree but they often depict a transition between reigns, not always orderly with other names turning up like Danzhu and Gun.  Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 17:16, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies Contradictions 

message: Chinese  wiki says he's the 6th generation descendant of 帝顓頊, thus making him Huangdi's descendant right? Hanfresco 06:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  huangdi 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support - the current title really isn't parelelled for any other Huaxia monarch. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 19:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The huabiao article states that surviving ancient Chinese records credit Shun with their creation. If so, that should be sourced and mentioned somewhere within this article. — LlywelynII 13:42, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Huabiao

message: If Shun died in Cangwu, Guangxi, why is the place name "Cangwu" mentioned nowhere in the text of the current version of this article? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 02:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since he never existed in the first place, and there aren't any important legends about his death, it doesn't matter which place it's said he died at. Is there a temple or mausoleum or grave mound at Cangwu that claims to be Shun's? That would be something to mention if so, but otherwise it's probably just a bit of trivia that has no broader cultural implications. Folly Mox (talk) 08:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of death
Talk:USS Texas (CGN-39)

message: The article currently says she has a complement of 539 men.  I served in USS Virginia (lead ship of the class) and we were crowded
when we had 350 onboard.  Does anyone know a more accurate numbder than 539?
Tom Hubbard (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I Discovered this written on the talk page for the photo USS Texas (CGN-39). I have no way to confirm it, but maybe someone else can? TomStar81 23:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They must be talking about Iran not Iraq. Iran hostage crisis and Operation Eagle Claw. --Dual Freq (talk) 14:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Information?

message: I served aboard USS Texas CGN-39 in Deck Division from summer of 82 to the summer of 83... the ship was still in the Yards in Portsmouth, Va in drydock just finishing refit in june of 1982 when I got there we then moved to Norfolk NOB a few weeks later then we were regrouped and assigned to the new carrier Carl Vinson's battlegroup as escort for her maiden cruise around the world early March 1983... Monaco, Casablanca, our golden Shellback  initiation at 0 degrees/ 0 degrees, Abidjan, Diego Garcia which is where I got off the ship... point is in article the new Zealand protest happened after I left the ship not before we left port so your article has the timeline skewed as Wellington hosted the battlegroup during the cruise... 
Sincerely 
SN T.Blaisdell  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:7981:2C00:D6:7087:F509:88C3 (talk) 22:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  World cruise circa 1983 notes
Talk:USS Texas (SSN-775)

message: The dates in the introduction don't seem to match those listed in the ship table.  Ship ordered and laid down appear to be off by a year while the launch date could probably be doublechecked as well.  The only date without contention seems to be the commission date. TCB007 11:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: The opening paragraph claims it was named in honour of the "Lone Star state" - now I'm no expert so I won't change it myself but that sounds like a nickname for the state. Shouldn't it just say named in honour of Texas?
 Also I added a citation tag on an unsourced claim. Sorry if it was inappropriate to do so. --Andrews Palop (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph 
Talk:David Riesman

message: Democracy and defamation, 1941
The lonely Crowd: A study of the changing American Character, by David Riesman, Nathan Glazer, and Reuel Denny, 1950
Faces in the Crowd: Individual studies in Character and Politics, 1952
Thorstein Veblen: a Critical Interpretation, 1953
Individualism reconsidered, and other essays, 1954
Abundance for what? And other essays, 1965
The Academic Revolution, by Christopher Jencks and David Riesman, 1968
On Higher Education: The Academic Enterprise in an Era of Rising Student Consumerism, 1980--RKontessa (talk) 12:38, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Majors Works by David Riesman 

message: * http://www.anb.org/articles/14/14-01157-print.html
* https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304193487_Riesman_David_1909-2002
* https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225930124_In_memoriam_David_Riesman_22091909-10052002
* https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02698968?no-access=true
* http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02732170802342982
czar 16:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential sources 

message: I agree with the contributor noted above writing under "Untitled", Riesman is a sociologist. His accomplishment is in the field of sociology. I would further urge that someone with greater knowledge of Riesman and his contribution take on a major rewrite of this entry. This is embarrassing for these little snippets to assume the place of an Encyclopedia entry. LAWinans (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism
Talk:Sailor (band)

message: Hello all. I'm not a Sailor fan myself, but my mother is, and she swears that they were Dutch, and her CDs and cassettes from the 70s seem to suggest this too, though the Wikipedia article here states that they were British. Can anybody shed some light on what nationality the group actually was? - MartinP1983
:I'm reasonably sure the band was British, although Georg Kajanus's own article says he was born in Norway. The biography on this fansite suggests they were mostly British. —Whouk (talk) 18:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dutch Troupe?

message: ... is this song really original or a cover?  It really sounds more Cole Porter than 1970ies. Maikel (talk) 09:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Girls Girls Girls

message: Let's face it, this entry is more a fanticle than encyclopedic.  Please work on it, someone! Maikel (talk) 09:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Call this NPOV?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Irpen

message: A couple of trolls launched Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Irpen and hectically spam the talk pages of Russophobic editors in the hope of intimidating this invaluable wikipedian. I suggest every reasonable wikipedian should refrain from feeding the trolls. Let's see how the likes of Andriyka, Molobo, Piotrus, Halibutt and Ukrained stage a Russophobic circus here. --Ghirla -трёп- 17:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal attack by Ghirlandajo 

message: First of all, I would like to thank David.Mestel for his outside view.
There was, however, a misunderstanding. I did not claim a violation of WP:3RR by Irpen. I ment another rule (see  Types_of_vandalism the subsection "Improper use of dispute tags "):
::As a general rule, do not remove other people's dispute tags twice during a 24 hour period.
Irpen violated this rule by removing the tag three times during 24 hours :  
# 16:49, 20 June 2006
# 06:09, 21 June 2006
# 06:20, 21 June 2006
The evidence that the respondant removed an OR tag was listed by AndriyK. He explained it in his statement. I cannot comment much on it, I was not involved in that dispute.
By mistake, I duplicated one of the diffs. It is corrected . I thank David.Mestel for pointing it out. I apologize to Irpen and to the community for this mistake.--Mbuk 18:50, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: Is it time to close this RFC yet? I think abakharev's version of events attained the widest acceptance. --Tēlex 12:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Irpen told me he was going to post a response. Let's wait till at least that moment. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 14:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He already has, hasn't he? --Tēlex 14:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, he told me he was writing an extensive response during his trip. Said he should be back by the end of the week and post it. The diff you provide is IMHO a "pre-response" saying "I'm off for a trop and gonna post it later". Just my $.02 though... :) -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 14:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close
Talk:Archdemon

message: Err... This looks like it needs to be cleaned up a bit.
Does anyone know the name of the Archdemons?
Anon: Who wrote this crap? This page is outrageously stupid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.9.105.142 (talk) 04:35, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Collosians 16? Ephesians 21? from whose butthole is this crap pulled from.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.110.162.200 (talk) 14:12, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  nonexistant chapters
Talk:Ashva

message: *http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rayfield&diff=prev&oldid=68605595
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rayfield&diff=next&oldid=68605595
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rayfield&diff=next&oldid=68607002 
Please note that the page relates to an horse as described in Hindu mythology and Hindu scriptures. --Bhadani 13:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About content
Talk:ZX Spectrum demos

message: Three years and nobody could add more than a paragraph to this article?  Obviously there is much missing that could be added - like, for example, what ZX Spectrum demos are.  If nobody can expand this, I'm putting it up for deletion. --Vossanova o< 17:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What a sad display of pointless malice. Mirror Vax 22:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Allright, looks better now.  Expansion tag removed. --Vossanova o< 11:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand or die!
Talk:Gaja

message: Instead of the page name as Elephant (Hindu mythology), I have named the page Gaja, the most commonly used Sanskrit word for elephant. Gaja is used in most of the Hindu scriptures, as also in Buddhist and Jaina texts. I have made a re-direction link from Elephant (Hindu mythology). If required, similar re-direction links may be created from Elephant (Buddhist mythology) and Elephant (Jaina mythology). In case, some editors are able to create separate stubs for Elephant (Buddhist mythology) and Elephant (Jaina mythology), which shall be a welcome step. All the best! The page has been named gaja to impart the page the touch of reality. --Bhadani 17:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, this is just a small part of the complete article which I propose to write. I would request other editors to contribute for building a good page. --Bhadani 17:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:The Renegade (wrestler)

message: Why does the picture call him "Rick Wilson"?  ... discospinster talk 04:21, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wilson? 

message: Find it a bit confusing, that his cause of death is "Multiple gunshot suicide", and it says he "died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head"? How does someone manage to shoot himself multiple times in the head? 78.82.163.169 (talk) 01:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death 

message: Because he deserved better. God bless the man. :-( 98.224.129.251 (talk) 19:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed middle initial and added find a grave entry
Talk:Ornithoptera euphorion

message: The three images obviously represent butterflies. What they actually are requires confirmation. Can someone please check out the images and delete the incorrect one? AshLin 05:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image check

message: All three images are Cairns Birdwing Butterflies. Lepidlizard (talk) 12:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. AshLin (talk) 15:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I think the Gallery on Commons for this species is Troides euphorion - I tried to find the latin name in the internet and it seems as if they are both used.
The most credible source I found 
(barcoding life) used only Troides euphorion...
--Anna reg (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin name
Talk:Death's head

message: The phrase "death's head" does NOT specifically mean the totenkopf, so the old redirect was inappropriate. —Ryan McDaniel 17:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed redirect

message: Agree with the merge. - FrancisTyers · 18:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with merge. Jlittlet 22:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: It doesn't make much sense to have this redirect to Skull (symbolism) when there's an article at Death's Head, so I've made the necessary change. PC78 18:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: This article basically says 'Death's Head' is 'skull'.  What gives 'death's head' separate distinction from 'skull'?  Perhaps eyes? or a light where eyes would be?
:example: death's head with points of light as eyes
:: Friimynd (talk) 16:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning
Talk:Queen Alexandra's birdwing

message: Aren't the Queen Alexandra's endangered? Im not quite sure. -- IvanTortuga 20:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Status

message: While I'm no Ornithoptera expert, I'm quite sure that the pictured species is not O. alexandrae. Definite pictures of the species, both male and female, can be found here – and very close to natural size BTW; a touch larger perhaps. Looks more like O. goliath (picture) to me, though I'm rather oblivious to all possible confusion species. These too seem to be close to natural size, but the text seems to have the sexes confused (the picture's got it right)'''''
. --Anshelm '77 02:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i have had similar thoughts. I don't think too that this is O. alexandrae. --Melly42 08:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong picture 

message: While this article is informative, it is not as well organized as it could be and should have a separate Behavior subsection. While the information on the adults mating behaviors is well detailed, it should be moved to this new section rather than be under the biology heading. It should also include feeding, defense, and migration patterns (if any). Also, the second paragraph under larva should be moved to a behavior section as well. Overall, there is good information but it is poorly organized. Alexandra.payne (talk) 03:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavior Section 

message: Check this link  
::don't believe any hokum you read. the caterpillars feed on poisonous plants but that don't mean that they make this butterfly poisonous --Melly42 (talk) 07:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poisonous? 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 19:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Queen Alexandra's birdwing 
Talk:Mother Earth

message: What? NO article on Mother Earth- the goddesss and personification of the Earth?
Please can there be a sep page for Earth Mother if someone is going to keep deleting the section, Earth Mother within Mother Earth.   Not all women can or do have children but many contribute to the future of the world and nurture those within it.  For these women a tag of Earth Mother would make a significant difference.  Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.174.238.230 (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mother Earth
Talk:Power-system automation

message: Wikified as part of the wikification drive.  KarenAnn 17:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: Wow, all I can say is this article needs a lot of work. It is very poorly written; it is confusing and poorly organized, and is way too informal in tone. It also needs a lot of expansion. It needs a decent introduction too - the introductory sentence is horrible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.228.245.174 (talk) 03:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It's an important topic, too, and deserves the attention. I'll put this on my hit list and try to get back with some details once I can find some good reliable sources. Morrand (talk) 02:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work 

message: This page redirects for Telemeter... though is not really relevant to Telemeters, Telemetery or other sundy uses of that word.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.42.80.225 (talk) 21:55, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Offhand I can think of one application for Telemeter (an obsolete and non-notable pay television box) and based on the "what links here" for this page, which lists out what comes here via the Telemeter redirect, there are other applications. One refers to "telemetering seismometers" (which really should link out to telemetering, but that's another redirect here) and the other is Telemeter Glacier, where telemeter seems to be (in context) something like a surveyor's transit or theodolite. I agree that the redirects are inappropriate and I'll go break them. For what it's worth, we have an article for telemetry already which may be what you're looking for. Morrand (talk) 02:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Telemeter

message: Individual IEEE technical standards are generally not "notable" in the Wikipedia sense. The article at C37.94 presently rehashes a lot of things related to power system automation and specific mention of the topic standard is minimal. Suggest a merge and redirect, collecting whatever text seems generally applicable from C37.94 where it's an improvement to this article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest merge
Talk:Oleocanthal

message: Should oleuropein be mentioned as a related compound?  Or is it the same compound under a different name?  Badagnani 17:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oleuropein 

message: Why is "Aldehydes" a category, yet aldehydes are not mentioned in the article? Badagnani 04:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aldehydes 

message: Should we discuss the Melliou-Magiatis (colorimetric assay) method, the two new compounds found in olive oil, and their comparison with oleacein?
http://www.oliveoiltimes.com/olive-oil-health-news/new-phenolic-compounds-unveiled-at-harvard-conference/41387 MaynardClark (talk) 19:23, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: New compounds found in olive oil
Talk:G. W. Bailey

message: The link to the Port Arthur museum has the year of birth as 1944. Does someone have a reliable source to verify the correct year? JungleCat 18:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth

message: I know this man in real life.  He's my best-friends granddad.  I might be able to get some information from him. 76.171.59.206 (talk) 03:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I know

message: According to most style guides, including Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Abbreviations#Full_stops_.28periods.29), you would not put a space after the period that follows the G in his name. So it should be G.W. Bailey, not G. W. Bailey. But someone just tried to change it to the latter, on the Major Crimes page, and I wonder if that's in part because this page is titled with the space, as in G._W._Bailey. Should the title/main URL be changed to match the correct formatting of G.W._Bailey? CleverTitania (talk) 02:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: For abbreviations, yes; names and initials, no. — Wyliepedia 00:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space after the first period in the page title 

message: It is listed his ex-wife is Eleanor Jane Goosby However her name is actually Eleanor June Goosby. Physco219 (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide a reliable source? -- Pemilligan (talk) 02:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  His wife
Talk:Live Dudes

message: Would anyone please upload the actual CD cover, rather than the Chroma re-release? --HarryCane 18:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CD cover
Talk:Duns, Scottish Borders

message: Duns is pronounced "doonz", right? - THE GREAT GAVINI {T-C} 18:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, OK, thanks. - THE GREAT GAVINI {T-C} 14:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Delta Eridani

message: What is the basis for including this section? Is there any evidence that supported the possibility of a planetary system to be present that has been refuted? The only thing I read in the source of this is the fact that there is none detected so far, something that is applicable to most stars in the heavens. Also, parts of the section seem to be directly copied from the source.--Kalsermar 18:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible planetary system