Talk:Longest rivers of the United Kingdom

message: Cant you say where all the river are from or where they start or finish
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.26.205 (talk • contribs) 
:That may not be a bad idea although i am not sure whether settlement or other area should be used. Simply south (talk) 23:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Start/Finish

message: Is there a ranking of rivers by the size of their drainage basin? — sjorford++ 23:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basin size? 

message: What are the sources for this data? I have added Owen et al to the rivers where the length quoted is the same, but several of the others are wildly different to the sources I have. Bob1960evens (talk) 13:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for this data

message: As confirmed on wikipedia's own page for River source there is no universally agreed method for defining a rivers' source so what has been used here and on all other UK river pages?
As an example of the issues that arise the following can be said for the River Spey:
The headwaters of the Spey can broadly be considered to come from three locations if all the various criteria are considered (furthest from the mouth, head of most dominent watercourse, greatest elevation etc.) Loch Spey to the west, Shesgnan Burn to the north and Allt Coire Bhanain to the south. Taking the confluence of Shesgnan Burn as the datumn point the furthest point 'up stream' from here at 6.6km is via Allt Coire Bhanain between Meall Ptarmigan and Garbh Choire - a clear 2km further than any other tributary. This is also the highest point of the the three. However, based on Google's aerial photography the most dominant source is clearly from Loch Spey as the article currently identifies. However, if the Loch Spey watercourse is to be considered the correct source then the spring feeding into Loch a' Bhanain must be considered the actual true source location (this being 0.1km further than the longest spring to the north west of the Loch itself). This though is just 3.9km from the confluence of the Shesgnan Burn.
My personal preference for determining the source of a river is the furthest point from the mouth of the river regardless of any other criteria. This would mean that for the River Spey the source is not Loch Spey but Allt Coire Bhanain. Simontific (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for determining a rivers' source 

message: 75.5 miles = 121.505 km, so it is just possible, but very unlikely, for the length (which is not defined to that degree of precision anyway) to be 75 miles and 122 km, both rounded to the nearest unit. ----Ehrenkater (talk) 18:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: But we have a reputable source for 122 Km , is there a similarly robust source for 75.5 miles ?  Velella  Velella Talk   22:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated in the article, there is not much consensus about the exact lengths of rivers. However if you want to show 122 km, then for consistency the miles figure should be changed to 76.----Ehrenkater (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

text: On looking at the other rivers in the table, there was just one, the Wye, where the miles and km figures were clearly inconsistent. I've changed the 135 to 134, for which there are plenty of sources. ----Ehrenkater (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of the river Teifi 

message: The longest rivers in this list all end in rather indeterminate estuaries and it would seem that the lengths of the rivers are calculated to the limits of the relevant harbour authorities. Thus the Severn ends at the limit of the Gloucester Harbour Trustees influence which is roughly the Bristol Avon, the Thames ends at the Yantlet Line (Isle of Grain to Southend) and the Trent at Immingham. I don't have access to Owen et al's book which is the most referenced on this page. Can someone who has tell me if they mention this, or give some alternative definition?
The problem is that things have changed over time. In particular the PLA's authority now stretches to a line between Margate and Frinton-on-sea. The Severn now has something called the Severn River Basin District which ends in the line between the Gower and near Weston-super-Mare which is normally considered as the end of the Severn Estuary and where the Bristol Channel starts. The Humber all comes under BPC so presumably stretches past Grimsby which was once a separate authority. These make a difference of between 14 and 30 miles difference to the lengths of these rivers so really makes a nonsense of these numbers.
The problem is to find a reliable source which reflects this. Very few professionals will touch the lengths of rivers. The subject doesn't lead to any unique answers. It looks as if the article is using information that is nearly 50 years out of date. Chris55 (talk) 23:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: "between the Gower and near Weston-super-Mare" I think you mean Lavernock Point near Barry and Brean Down near Weston-Super-Mare Op47 (talk) 16:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ends of estuaries 

message: The rivers included in this list all appear to be cartographical rivers, ie the length where the name is applied to a river. For example, the river known as the Thames is so called between ST981994 and TR000800 (approx). If we can accept TR0008000 as the mouth of the Thames then the furthest source appears to be at SO966169, i.e. the source of the Churn. At List of rivers by length, this is what is being recorded i.e. true rivers. According to that article's conventions, the entry for the Thames would now be Thames-Churn. In the same spirit, the following at least ought to be added: Humber-Trent and Humber-Ouse-Ure. I am happy to measure it and cite the OS. Would that be an acceptable way forward? Op47 (talk) 16:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Thames-Churn debate does make a nice story, but as the BBC article states the OS still marks the source as Thameshead. As discussed above there seems to be enough problems in finding reliable sources for the lengths of rivers in the traditional or as you say the cartographical method, which is the biggest issue for this article. As for stringing rivers together, and measuring them yourself, I think that falls under WP:OR, but thanks for offering to do the work (and for checking here first)...Jokulhlaup (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartographical rivers v True Rivers 

message: A quick measure on the map reveals the Tyne is nowhere near this length. Since the River Tyne article has the same issue, can we please keep discussion on Talk:River Tyne and read the results of any discussion to here. Op47 (talk) 17:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Longest rivers of the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221091540/http://www.ccgc.gov.uk/landscape--wildlife/protecting-our-landscape/special-sites-project/aber-to--brecon-sac-list/afon-teifi--river-teifi-sac.aspx to http://www.ccgc.gov.uk/landscape--wildlife/protecting-our-landscape/special-sites-project/aber-to--brecon-sac-list/afon-teifi--river-teifi-sac.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I was surprised to find that the River Usk was missing (I've added it now)! It came in at no 20, necessitating shuffling the remaining ones down a place. Are there any more missing from this list I wonder?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geopersona (talk • contribs) 13:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing rivers 

message: I have adjusted the length of the River Wye to match the longer referenced length given in the article for the river. It has the effect of nudging it up one place in the list. Competing values for river lengths has been discussed in various places and is an issue unlikely to be resolved any time soon. Without access to the former reference used for the Wye it is difficult to pass judgement on what authority it might be felt to have, though the new one comes from the statutory body charged with attending to the river's status as an SSSI (at least in Wales) so might be expected to be more authoritative than most.Geopersona (talk) 19:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  River Wye 

message: I'd like to suggest the name be changed to "Major rivers of the United Kingdom".  The reason is that there are other criteria for the importance of rivers, especially average discharge rate (which is already a column in the list).  There is no sense in creating a new list/article for "Rivers of the United Kingdom with the largest discharge rates".  It would be better to build on what we have.  The paradigmatic example of a river that could be added once the name is changed is the River Ness in Scotland (drains Loch Ness), which has one of the highest discharge rates in the UK at 91 cubic metres per second, but is a very short river at 10 km.  Jaywilson (talk) 09:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposal has its attractions - , your observations re discharge are quite correct - but on the other hand one could point out that this article is one of a long list of current "longest rivers" articles. Both parameters are interesting and people will come to WP for info on both lengths and discharge rates. Worth noting that the "Major rivers of the US" article redirects to the "Longest rivers of the US" article. Of course it could also be fixed so that each of these worked the other way round too, "longest rivers" redirecting to "major rivers". No strong feelings on this but consistency across countries would be desirable. cheers Geopersona (talk) 10:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested article name change/move 

message: As an aside, a note as to what 'mean flow' actually signifies would be valuable. One suspects that, like length, the quoted figures are not wholly without difficulty. The quoted source for the figures shows that the gauging stations from which they are derived are at differing points along various rivers' courses making comparisons a little problematic, though not hugely so. I note that the figure given for the Yorkshire Ouse in the table in the article is the summation of the individual figures for separate gauging stations on the Yorkshire Ouse at Skelton upstream of York and of stations on its downstream tributaries, the Foss and the Wharfe. cheers Geopersona (talk) 10:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discharge/mean flow

message: I've added a column for the mouths of each of the rivers since the reader coming to this page in search of a river length may well also be interested to know where a particular river starts and finishes. Issues around pinpointing the exact locations have already been discussed but in the additional column I've provided sufficiently generic info to sidestep those difficulties. It would make sense of course for it to be preceded by a 'source' column. cheers Geopersona (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start/finish (again) 

message: I note that, looking at the lengths of each river given on its own page, the following should be included within this list - River Wey at 87mi, the River Swale at 73.2mi and the River Weaver at 71 miles. Why is it top 32 anyway - a strange choice of number you might think. cheers Geopersona (talk) 05:51, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was originally prefaced by the words "This is a list of the longest rivers", until someone (mis)counted and added a figure.  I've reverted to the original wording.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Having independently measured the length of the Weaver it comes out at 10% less than the figure given on its page so I withdraw that one from potential additions, though I can't replace the figure due to mine being 'OR'! Geopersona (talk) 21:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Have now added the Swale based on the length given on its page; it comes in at joint 25th. I think the addition of another column to this table would assist in its interpretation indicating whether the length quoted is from the furthest point of a headwater or else, as in the Swale's case, from a junction of headwater streams some several kms down from the source of the flow itself. Geopersona (talk) 13:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More missing rivers