Talk:Nanded

message: The Infobox had the latitude and longtude values switched. As a result, the city was not located on the map show.
I changed (77.0° N 18.5° E) to (19.09° N 77.27° E). Note that besides swapping the latitude and longtidude, I have
also changed the values slightly. These values were taken from .
I don't know of an authoritative source, but these new values appear to correct by checking a map.
In article text itself says "Its Longitude 77.7 to 78.15. East and Its Latitude is 18.15 to 19.55". The new latitude value I have set in the Infobox falls just outside this range. However, I don't know the correct range for the limits of the city, so I have left it as it is. If anyone has accurate information, please update the text.  --Chipmunk 18:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://srtmun.ac.in/Aboutsrtmun.aspx. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Danger (talk) 13:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: An image used in this article, File:SRTMU Ned.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:SRTMU Ned.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:SRTMU Ned.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Nanded Port.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Nanded Port.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Nanded Port.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Nanded Location.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Nanded Location.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Nanded Location.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: There has been mass edits and vandalism on this page by unknown IP addresses. So I am requesting for semi-protection where only registered users can edit the article.--Rizwanmahai (talk) 04:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Semi-protection is usually done for recent vandalism. Last IP edit was yesterday which was not vandalism. Before that IP editing was on 5th August, 12 days ago, which is not recent, so it is less likely that page will get semi-protected as of now. If we find IP vandalism in future then we can request semi-protection by using twinkle. Regards. --Human3015Send WikiLove  05:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Bro, but there has been mass edits every alternate day in the month of June and I have tried cleaning up this article many times and each time a new IP creates non sense.--Rizwanmahai (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  June is not relevant today, admins semi-protect page only for recent ongoing disruptive editing. We can watch for page, if any IP repeatedly does any disruptive editing then we can ask for semi-protection that too for limited time. Even if I ask or 5 people ask for semi-protection of this article, still no admin will do that. --Human3015Send WikiLove  05:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

text: requests for page protection must be made at WP:Requests for page protection and currently, this page would not qualify - Arjayay (talk) 08:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Semi-Protection

message: Substituted at 00:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: A Guru never dies but attains immortality. My family has been visiting the place since 25 years and the local people never say that Guru Gobind Singh Ji died here but they say he attained immortality here. We should restrict ourselves from using this terminology completely as it is disrespectful. The second thing is that it is mandatory to use Ji as we are referring to God here. It is a necessity. Let us all be respectful to God. Knowledge should teach us the right things in the way they are ought to be learned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paramdeeptung (talk • contribs) 20:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dies 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nanded. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928012021/http://beed.nic.in/htmldocs/socioeco.htm to http://beed.nic.in/htmldocs/socioeco.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified