lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aizuwakamatsu Castle

message: Why is this article at Aizuwakamtasu Castle rather than Tsuruga Castle or Tsuruga-jo? I've never heard the castle referred to as anything but Tsuruga-jo or Tsuruga Castle, and all the signs in town refer to it by this name. — BrianSmithson 07:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This castle is called "Wakamatsu Castle" 若松城（わかまつじょう) on the Japanese page. -Artanisen (talk) 08:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

text: I've lived here next to Tsuruga Castle for over four years. My Japanese family are from Aizuwakamatsu also and we all still live here. It is only ever referred to by locals, Japanese and foreigners as, Tsuruga Castle. The title of this page must be updated, it is factually incorrect. 2405:6583:30E0:4400:5047:E77B:950C:7672 (talk) 22:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Gospel of Truth

message: Interesting that the passage quoted talks about those who have become 'perfect'. Valentinus's followers referred to those who had achieved true spiritual Gnosis as the 'Perfect Ones'. The Midi-Pyrenean Christian Gnostic movement the Cathars referred to their spiritual elite as the 'Perfecti' or 'Parfaits'. Has anyone investigated as to whether there is a direct line from the early Christian Gnostics to the Cathars? There must be. ThePeg 19.8.2006
---
As I am currently undergoing an introductory course in Gnostic Studies, my opinion may not be entirely valid.
However, as the teacher for the course, Jörgen Magnusson, points out in his translation of the original coptic version of the Gospel of Truth, it is not the demiurge (error personified) that actually nails Christ to the Wood (it does not specifically states cross, although one ought to assume that it really does not matter in this case), but rather a form of 'they' is used; which would, in the general opinion of our study-group, indicate that it is not Error itself that does it, but rather humans under its influence, people blind to the light and truth of Christ's message.
----
Right. But "they" could also mean archons, evil spiritual forces ruling the world, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.17.174 (talk) 01:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think that "they" would be a rather obvious reference to those who directly worshipped the demiurge and called it God above all...that being the Jews (namely the Jewish religious leadership of the time). Bladesinger46n2 (talk) 02:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Gospel of Truth - Valentinus and the Cathars

message: the article states, "These truths are in many ways in conflict with the Roman Catholic Church, who see themselves as a link between the Father and mankind. The idea in the Gnostic Gospels that someone could come to a meaningful understanding of the teachings of Jesus and the Father on their own, without the Church, eliminates the need for a Church, so it follows then that Churches are barriers to knowledge rather than holders of it."
if the church is unnecessary, it does not follow that the church is a barrier!!  perhaps the author refers to explicit anti-church content in the Gospel, but the statement as it stands requires amplification or revision. - anonymous 7-25-09  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.3.113.232 (talk) 18:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: It does not follow

message: Removed embedded link - "Are the Coptic Gospels Gnostic?", could be a reference but metalog.org appears to be down. Jonpatterns (talk) 14:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed embedded link metalog.org 

message: This needs clarification. Whoever added the section, are you referring to this? https://gnosis.org/library/valentinus/Fragments_Valentinus.htm
If so, it's relatively comtemporary commentary, so ought to be described as such, with the specific author cited. Bkengland (talk) 01:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layton not identified
Talk:Brad Leeb

message: This article is still a stub.  Where is this guideline that says it's not?  I didn't find it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Player pages format... Valrith 07:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub status
Talk:Ron Sparks (comedian)

message: Could someone please disambiguate the link to "Grand Theatre" under awards? Thanks. PamD (talk) 16:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Grand Theatre 

message: I removed where he was born and lives from the lead paragraph. Unless some reason for notability, this can go further into the article. Malerooster (talk) 23:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead paragraph
Talk:Ron van Clief

message: Wasn't he a Commissioner some time later?  mpa 9:50pm EST  July 25, 2007
: Noted. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 02:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Commissioner?

message: I thought boxing and muay thai had no belts system. Near the end, when the sports he has black belts on is listed, it claims that. Please change it. 
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.22.112.221 (talk) 19:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Anything written in a living person bio here on Wikipedia that is uncited may be removed immediately without discussion. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 02:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Belt system

message: I'm questioning whether his actual title is "shidoshi". The reason why is that the  shidoshi title is used exclusively in Ninjitsu. And as it has been claimed that Master Van Clief has studied Ninjitsu, his own style isn't solely Ninjitsu. SO, it would be safe to say that his title would be under the traditional Japanese title structure.
Rayghost (talk) 07:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Those sentences had no citations so I removed them until reliable sources can be found.  The Japanese term shidōsha (指導者) is a general term meaning: "leader; guide; mentor; coach".
(Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 02:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about his title in Chinese Goju
Talk:Ron W. Miller

message: Is labeling Stanley Gold a "majordomo" really the right tone for an encyclopedia article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.149.66.206 (talk) 15:48, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Particularly without reliable sources describing Gold as such.  I reworded. Rlendog (talk) 10:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Gold 
Talk:Rona Barrett

message: The external link referring to an early Kate Jackson interview is no longer in existence.  That same interview can be seen on the Kate Jackson site (http://www.hostvertex.com/~katejack/rona.html).  -- Wallnut
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallnut (talk • contribs) 03:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Rona Barrett link outdated''' 

message: Rona Barrent was not divorced. 
Barrett was married to Bill Trowbridge for 30, until his death. His obit: http://lompocrecord.com/lifestyles/announcements/obituaries/article_a25d37a0-ce16-5402-aea7-93f787f20403.html
Her column on his death: http://syvnews.com/lifestyles/rona-barrett-s-gray-matters/article_b94912d4-98be-5084-886e-6866b76d4761.html
Zabadu~enwiki (talk) 04:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not divorced 
Talk:Ronald Atkins

message: Assuming the birthdate is certainly correct, Ronald Atkins has reached the age of 100 years today, making him the only living British ex MP to be a centenarian. I have added a link to a Lancashire Evening News report, which has provided added background information on him, as citation.Cloptonson (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted from the Infobox that he is known for being "First British centenarian MP". In fact he is the eleventh ex MP to achieve his 100th birthday. Statement is also ambiguous, as no MP has been recorded to have been sitting in parliament older than the alleged 95 years of Sir Francis Knollys who died in office as MP for Reading in 1648.Cloptonson (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah I see, I must have misread the LEP source, my bad. Jdcooper (talk) 09:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

text: he's the longest lived overall but also is the oldest living former MP currently alive. He will lose the latter title immediately upon his death. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 06:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Now a centenarian
Talk:Ronald Bell (musician)

message: imdb.com indicates he was in a French movie in 1960. He would have been 8 years old?  AMCKen (talk) 00:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie Role

message: I removed this full quote, which was an unsourced addition in March 2018.  It seems like some forums and now obituaries likely got it from Wikipedia. Do not use those as references (WP:CIRCULAR).—Bagumba (talk) 11:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular reference pf full quote
Talk:Ronald Bennett (priest)

message: I don't hink this is a suitable article for inclusion in this category. Sexual abuse of children has no specific bearing on the sexuality of the person perpetrating it. In this particular case the perpetrator only had access to young boys. --Mia-etol (talk) 14:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was placed by a sockpuppet of a banned editor and has been removed. -- Mattinbgn\talk 15:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT categorisation
Talk:Ronald Davison

message: The description of  the sentence as harsh is correct, as 10 years is long by NZ standards. But the statement that it was "highly applauded" is false and political, and rather poor English. Some people may have applauded the sentence, but others did not. The claim is also unreferenced.125.236.202.112 (talk) 02:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence
Talk:University of Glasgow Rectorial Election, 2001

message: An article associated with this article - Glasgow University Labour Club - has been nominated for deletion. Please contribute to the discussion at:
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow University Labour Club
Thanks. --Mais oui! 10:51, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD - Glasgow University Labour Club 

message: Please see Talk:University of Glasgow#"Glasgow University" in article titles for discussion that may result in this article being retitled to use "University of Glasgow". Timrollpickering 01:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Ronald Drever

message: Since there is little doubt that, among the many significant awards related to the discovery of Gravitational Waves shared by Drever, the Nobel Prize will soon be added to the list, the importance of this article can no longer be classed as "low" ;^)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: And look... Here it is 2019 and his article has ascended/descended to "Stub Class".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.1.214.5 (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The stub ratings go back to February 2006, when the article looked like this. The stub-templates have long since been removed from the article; it's clearly start-class now. I'll leave it to editors active in the respective projects to assess the importance-levels. (Note that class and importance are different things; "class" refers to the length and state of the article; "importance" goes to the importance of the subject within a particular project.) TJRC (talk) 18:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:Ronald Enroth

message: Under "Assessment and criticism" I suggest using http://www.rickross.com/reference/jesuspeople/jesuspeople4.html in place of or in addition to http://cultlink.com/ar/enroth.html since it contains Enroth's full response to the special edition magazine produced by Cornerstone/JPUSA. Easternroot (talk) 19:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rónald Gómez

message: Is he really ever played for this club? SpartacksCompatriot 13:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manchester United 
Talk:Ronald Langacker

message: I'm sure this article needs to be expanded in many ways, it seems quite "stubbish". But I am particularly surprised no mention is made of his contributions to the field of Uto-Aztecan comparative-historical linguistics. Indeed, some people might think those contributions are as important as the ones mentioned! Or is linguistics only important when it's about English? --A R King (talk) 10:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: All it takes is to add it!·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 16:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about R.W. Langacker the Uto-Aztecanist?
Talk:MMA (disambiguation)

message: ----
MMA refers to quite a few possible terms. It occurs questionable if the decision to list all terms in alphabetical order is a good one.
* Even people who know what they are looking for need quite a while to spot the desired entry
* It is not obvious what usage is most common.
Ordering entries by usage might be difficult to achieve. Instead, we could use the size of the referred article as an apt criteria.
Another usability proposal is to group the entries by categories, such as: Organisations and Companies; Products; Scientific Terms; ...
Yet another grouping could be done by subjects / fields of interest (Science, Medicine, IT, ...)
Uhm its quite common that MMA refers to "Mixed Martial Arts" how should i link that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.240.201.120 (talk) 14:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be the fifth item on the list already. Kuru talk 03:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi, I think this page should be moved to MMA_(disambiguation), which I think is its proper location. I will make a request to do this on the 'Uncontroversial technical requests' page. 
I hope to then redirect the 'MMA' base name to 'Mixed martial arts', which I believe is its primary usage. On the 'Mixed martial arts' page I will then put a hatnote which links to the MMA_(disambiguation) page. 
Would everyone be ok with these changes?RickyBennison (talk) 17:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: MMA to MMA_(disambiguation)

message: In much of Africa, "Mma" is also a polite title when addressing a female, much like "Mrs." in English. Should that be added? --Shadow (talk) 21:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  another meaning
Talk:Ronald Lee Gilman

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Ronald Lee Gilman was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Ronald M. Gould

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Ronald Murray Gould was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: I am currently writing a new article on the former English trade union leader Sir Ronald Gould, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers from 1947-1970.  To avoid confusion with the existing Ronald M. Gould page that refers to the US judge, I propose that the current redirect page at Ronald Gould (currently pointing at the US judge) becomes instead the page for the English trade unionist.  Both Ronald Gould pages should then have a "This page is about..." notice telling them about the other page.
This is in keeping with the disambiguation guidance on WP:DAB.  I would welcome comments from editors on this proposal.  Peteinterpol (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of use of the redirect page at [[Ronald Gould]]
Talk:Ronald M. Sega

message: Article contains a decent quantity of material, but needs to be organized along with more references to corroborate all the information. Lists should generally be placed towards the end of the article. Examples of articles at various stages of the quality scale can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment#Quality scale — click on "show" next to More detailed criteria for additional helpful information. KimChee (talk) 22:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of this has been taken care of, but the addition of citations from reliable sources is still needed. KimChee (talk) 00:14, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments
Talk:Dobryi vechir, tobi...

message: :Image:25ruslana03.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 22:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:25ruslana03.jpg

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:Album Dobryi vechir front cover.jpg, found on :Dobrij vechir, tobi..., has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 16:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Ronald Numbers

message: I made a interwiki-link to the german wikipedia for this article. I translated this biographic notes to german and wrote an article about Numbers book "The Creationists": :de:The Creationists. If there is any interest in a translation of this article into english please contact me preferably at my german user-page. Greetings -- Andreas Werle 22:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hallo 

message: While this may well be true (I don't know his official membership status), the article is included in that category. For that to be proper, proof should be mentioned (and referenced) in the article. -- Fyslee (collaborate) 09:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former SDA 

message: What is know his religious stance?--Vojvodaeist 15:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He now describes himself as an agnostic. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 11:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Seventh-day Adventists

message: A primary source video interview with the person to whom this biographical Wikipedia entry refers is a reputable source on said person. Ron Numbers is a reputable source on Ron Numbers.
:Blogging Heads is the video equivalent of a podcast. It is not a WP:RS. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 04:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliability of BloggingHeads

message: Steve Dufour just made this edit on the page and provided a very reasonable justification for doing so. However, I think we need to emphasize that, although Numbers writes about the history of creationism, he is not a creationist himself anymore. --- The mere information that Numbers is an agnostic was inserted more than two years ago... and still, more than once, I've seen people read this page and later claim that "Numbers is a creationist." In essence, I want to avoid people reading this paragraph and getting the wrong idea. --Leinad-Z (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number's agnosticism 

message: Among other things the work debunks various hoary myths that have nothing to do with actual history: such that the medieval Christian Church suppressed science, or that...</br>
Can the style be corrected?--Adûnâi (talk) 22:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopaedic, publicist style
Talk:Ronald Pelton

message: I don't understand this edit.  Why should we have a category saying he was charged if we already have a category saying he was convicted?Anythingyouwant (talk) 20:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You're entirely correct. I misread the diff of your original edit and thought you were adding the container category, not removing it, and thus I thought my edit was doing what your edit actually did. Mea culpa. —me_and 08:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, thanks.Anythingyouwant (talk) 14:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant category 

message: HE was released to day november 24
http://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2015/11/pelton-release/
173.21.185.76 (talk) 00:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  We were just waiting for an updated reference indicating he was released and not just scheduled.  KNHaw (talk) 03:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 
Talk:Hemoptysis

message: I think that the graphic should be transcribed by somebody who understands it, so that the text is searchable and has appropriate links. Will add wikify tag to section. --Storkk 11:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagnostic workup

message: The entire "Diagnostic approach" section seems to be lifted from here: http://tomi-md.com/2010/03/coughing-blood-hemoptysis/ I'm in the process of rewriting it to remove the offending material -- JaymesKeller (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it pending verification of permission. It was probably placed by the copyright owner, as it entered on its date of publication there () by a user with the name DrSHaber (note the author of the source). However, unless he verified permission, we can't use it. I'll notify him of the procedure. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation? 

message: Cardiac causes like congestive heart failure and mitral stenosis should be ruled out contains an odd choice of modal verb. Should be - Is this a statement or an instruction? (i.e. is should being used deontically or epistemically?) Someone who understands the purpose of this sentence could perhaps paraphrase it into something less cryptic. C0pernicus (talk) 14:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Differential Diagnosis

message: doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.06.41 JFW | T@lk 11:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive haemoptysis 

message: The caption of the radiology photo reads "Hemoptysis can be discovered with the help of radiology." Shouldn't this say, "The cause of hemoptysis can be discovered with the help of radiology."?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.137.128.43 (talk) 12:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd wording
Talk:Ronald Pickup

message: #The article needs to be expanded.
#It should make use of sections.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 19:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment Report

message: * The Fourth Protocol (film)
Has he been knighted i cant find anything to say he has
No he hasn't been knighted, nor can I find any indication that he is a baronet (the other way by which he might be designated as "Sir"). The entire article is very poor at present but I can't edit it yet as I'm only just getting to grips with wikipedia. Sitush 23:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor parts 

message: This was a RAI miniseries from the early 80s.  Not the 1952 Castellani film.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.140.154 (talk) 05:01, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verdi 

message: On enwiki: Camden, London; on Wikidata: Bloomington, USA. In obituaries nothing is mentioned. Wikidata makes reference to Enwiki Oldid... Akela (talk) 23:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of death?