lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale

message: I don't see any reason to single out Michael J. Fox in this article.  He may be a famous individual diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, but that hardly warrants use of his name here when no name is required to be identified, and indeed, the "fact" being associated with him is actually speculation about what "would have been" true. 206.57.41.114 (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fox 

message: The article talks about when the scale was revised, but does not seem to mention when (or how) it was developed in the first place (or by whom). —BarrelProof (talk) 19:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was this scale developed? 

message: I have searched for information on this subject and have not found anything that a layman could use to understand what the sequential effects of the disease might be - normally - is such a term has any validity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innovate0 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progression of Parkinson's Disease
Talk:School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge

message: this is a terrible article at the moment..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.107.48 (talk) 21:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

message: The article really needs to say what the pre clinical course involves.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.6.10.171 (talk) 20:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  pre-clinical course contents.
Talk:The Lance

message: "non notable student newspaper; student newspapers, unless particularly notable, should be covered in the university article. --Brianyoumans 02:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Conversely, the inclusion standard for print publications is a circulation of 5,000 copies. I don't see the value in determining these things by criteria as vague and subjective as "particularly notable". I believe that student newspapers should be held to the same standard as their non-student counterparts: if they meet the circulation figure, they're in; if they don't, they're out. It's so much less open to interpretation that way. But YMMV, I guess. Bearcat 18:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USMLE Step 1

message: Suggest removal of this controversy. It seems to be one those discussions worth of some Twitter buzz for a couple days but I question its encyclopedic notability. Basically, some people were offended, a couple blogs were written. Thoughts?MedGME (talk) 19:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was covered heavily in reliable sources, and therefore warrants inclusion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Katsufrakis & Chaudhry comments on Step 1 changes

message: I suggest we remove the "Unintended consequences" subsection. It seems to add little to the section of Step 1 score changes. It basically states ONE article was written that says students were not studying enough. Simply not worth of encyclopedic focus. Thoughts?MedGME (talk) 13:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Unintended consequences

message: It was brought up on Reddit that the changes made on 3 June 2020 from a now-deleted user were pretty biased in favor of pro-Pass/Fail even by those who also supported the change. I originally made some edits, but since I made them all in one, they were reverted. I've gone back and done a more piecemeal job of editing each section from the minor edits working up to the pretty major revisions. I think more work could be done in the Support for USMLE Changes. I tried to remain neutral, but if things need a little more fleshing out, I'm happy to continue editing! I think a section on the 80 experimental questions could also be added into controversy. Goofygubernaculum (talk) 20:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Pass/Fail 

message: @Goofygubernaculum: Your edits are highly appreciated by the community. I have some constructive criticism for you. 
The controversy section of this article is ever growing. According to our beloved Wikipedia: A controversy is "a prolonged public dispute or debate, with people having different opinions." For instance, people forcing Katsufrakis and Chaudhry to issue an apology within days of them saying something plainly wrong is not a "controversy", regardless of how offended the (or someone in the) medical community was. That was simply criticism. 
Students, physicians, NBME having discussions for years on the need for CS or making Step 1 P/F are controversies. We have to stop adding to this section every time there is a Twitter storm on a topic. The 80 experimental questions are not a controversy, there was criticism, bitter criticism indeed on medical blogs and the Twitterverse, but circumscribed in time.
Notice that Wikipedia discourages using controversy sections (Criticism#Approaches_to_presenting_criticism). Thus, I propose that instead of an "Exam Pricing and NBME Executive Salaries" (non-neutral) section that quotes a webpage that describes itself as "salty about medical education", we should have a Finances section that presents the information neutrally.
MedGME (talk) 03:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "Controversy"
Talk:USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge

message: can someone find out and add to this page the Mean and Standard Deviation to step2CK, as best as anyone can find?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.73.62 (talk) 01:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

message: Plenty of independent citations have been added. I suggest we remove the templates for citations and original research on top of the article. Thoughts? MedGME (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove tags
Talk:Henri Lammens

message: The last paragraph read:
Lammens concluded that the outcome of the meeting of Saqifah came about as the result of a conspiracy woven by Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman, who, in the Saqifah of the Banu Sa`idah, had agreed to seize the caliphate and succeed one another. ref
This did not seem significant. So I removed it. Kleinecke 05:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, i view it significant, it is an unorthodox stance, and it gives an idea of what kind of person Henri was. --Striver 09:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vacuum extraction

message: Support: I didn't propose the merger originally, but I saw the request on the merger proposal page. I believe that Vacuum extraction should be merged into this article. It's written much better than Vacuum extraction, and Vacuum extraction has little to offer than a picture. If the merger occurs, please redirect Vacuum extraction to Ventouse. Cheers! WiiAlbanyGirl 01:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Whats the reference to Benedict Phillips?  Someone having a gag?
195.68.31.231 (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benedict Phillips 

message: I noticed that this article and the Obstetrical forceps article both state that said device is safer than the other. Clarification is needed. Thanks! 2605:A601:A18B:2C00:9311:38DE:CA71:3E14 (talk) 12:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict between articles
Talk:A Dog Year

message: Is this notable?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.18.151 (talk) 00:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. Airplaneman talk 19:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable? 

message: Per , film was still unreleased at the end on December 2008. PC78 (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to imdb, it was released on 3 September, 2009. Airplaneman talk 19:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreleased? 
Talk:Aadavari Matalaku Arthale Verule

message: English in the article sucks.May be,before composing articles authors should evaluate their language expertise or atleast get it proof-read after composing.The only impression one gets is that the author's English is horrible. 70.122.12.175 13:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Virtual colonoscopy

message: Which are the common and typical complications (perforation, infection, bleeding, radiation induced carcinomas?) and what are the incidation rates? --85.127.193.170 (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complications? 

message: * What Are The Risks Of A Colonoscopy?
: Risks Of A Colonoscopy Include Perforation, Bleeding, and Infection
Let's mention the most important advantage of a VC -- potentially avoiding the risks of an optical colonoscopy.-71.174.175.150 (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  avoiding the risks of an optical colonoscopy
Talk:Thermoforming

message: thermoforming is not only the process hereby prescribed, and mostly referred to as vacuum forming.
Thermoforming is in fact a group name of "forming by means of heating".
It also includes hot line bending, ...
I just wanted to mention that I have to write a 750 word report on the vacuum forming machine.... If I find anything good I'll mention it here. I am a lemon 01:50, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; the process described in the article is really vacuum forming. Looks like needless duplication, and a merge might be in order, unless thermoforming includes different processes (although I can't imagine what would replace a vacuum for forcing the plastic against the mold.) This isn't another instance of American versus British English usage, is it? JustinTime55 (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the difference between thermoforming and [[vacuum forming]]?

message: A link to the most influential educator in the thermoforming industry is not random. Is there a better place to put it than here?
Proepro (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Calling him the "most influential educator in the thermoforming industry" is quite a stretch and unreferenced. According to his article he's a consultant, so his inclusion here seems a lot like an advert for his services. Also, when I deleted the link it was a red link, which is why I called it random. Wizard191 (talk) 17:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[William K. McConnell]]

message: I recently came across Twin Sheet Thermoforming as a type of thermoforming. Can we add a section for Types of Thermoforming similar to the Molding (Process) page. There is currently no Twin Sheet Thermoforming Wiki page to describe it. Eracer55 (talk) 13:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twin Sheet Thermoforming
Talk:Vital signs

message: This has the "primary four" listed but has five primaries in the list.  Somebody needs to either change this to "primary five" or list the fifth separately.Cargocontainer 20:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: i seached for a pakistani band called vital signs and found this page y?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supersaiyan474 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whats Wrong wit yo Ass? 

message: This article does not discuss the various coding/terminology systems that would/could be used with a vital measurement  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmehling (talk • contribs) 19:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coding/Terminology 

message: Brain vital signs seems something that is still waiting to gain currency. I've removed the information on this for now. JFW | T@lk 13:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content 

message: What are patient right 119.160.97.98 (talk) 11:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Core course book 1
Talk:Walking wounded

message: From the article:
"This is also a term used to describe high-functioning brain injury survivors because the injury isn't visible, and they appear okay. However, the disability is literally in their head."
By extension, "walking wounded" is also used to describe mental/emotional impairments such as PTSD, depression, and even grief. Here is a reference:
Oxford Dictionary of the US Military (at answers.com)
1. (usually the walking wounded) people who have been injured in a battle but who are still able to walk.
2. people who have suffered emotional wounds.
--96.251.99.156 (talk) 16:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mental/Emotional Debility
Talk:Wartenberg wheel

message: Ha... Wow:
Wartenberg wheels are a popular BDSM toy, proven by its constant presence on the bestsellers list of BDSM retailers. Similar in appearance to a pizza cutter, this wheel of prickly little pins is rolled over a person's skin, generating a unique, tingly sensation which many people really respond to. The pins are pointy enough to feel quite stimulating wherever they go but are not sharp enough to puncture the skin unless excessive pressure is used.
Many people "really respond" to it? The pins "feel quite stimulating wherever they go"?
I'm not sure whether the problem here is NPOV or Original Research.
Honestly. Search for a children's television series and this is what you find... The rabbit in the suitcase 22:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you DID search on the Internet, you wascally wabbit. Haven't you got the filter? You really responded and seem quite stimulated, I'll be amazed if this is your first such surprise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.200.159.231 (talk) 02:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ha

message: Neurology in the US uses a Wartenberg wheel often. Although cited, I didn't find the claim in the source. For cost effectiveness, a bent paper clip is often used to induce a sharp sensation. 108.8.11.201 (talk) 06:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rarely Used? 

message: "Because of hygienic concerns, these devices are rarely used any more" -- It's unclear which device, the metal one or the plastic one, both?  Is this even true, the metal ones could be sterilised like any other medical equipment and the plastic ones are likely single use much like other plastic surgical implements/equipment.  Anyone have a reference for this statement? 106.70.217.198 (talk) 10:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hygiene Concerns
Talk:The Air I Breathe

message: With regards to the imdb ratings, they have been as high as 9.5 with 200 votes prior to the film even being released. Even with test screenings, such a high percentage of the audience voting is... unlikely. The general consensus on the boards is it's the doing of Sarah Michelle Gellar's enthusiastic online fanbase, so I've added this in for context. Please don't delete.--58.104.7.193 14:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IMDB ratings

message: Another editor has added the image :Image:Airbreathe.jpg, stating that this is the official poster. Since neither the film's web site nor the IMDb page for the film show this particular poster, I suspect that the poster image should be removed. --Eastmain 04:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Poster

message: I deleted the old poster since it has been stated by Bob Rosa  in recent times that it was the poster designed for Tribeca and would be replaced by a new poster .
That poster is now available at the movie's official myspace here .
Since if you get a comma wrong a picture is listed for deletion ( I have seen that happen ) and I have never uploaded  a picture and would  be sure to make at least one mistake meaning the picture would be deleted I leave the uploading work to someone who knows what they are doing .Garda40 (talk) 14:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   Official  Poster 

message: "Happiness" seems to have little happiness in his life. "Pleasure" seems to have little pleasure in his life. "Love" is unrequited. Only "Sorrow" has that, but she gets the happy ending. -- Beardo (talk) 06:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone explain...
Talk:White coat ceremony

message: I reverted edits{}{}  by IP address 38.98.191.160.  The paper in Journal of Medical Ethics (Huber J Med Ethics. 2003; 29: 364-366) contradicts it.  
Also, http://www.humanism-in-medicine.org/doc_spring02.pdf states:
:"The tenth White Coat Ceremony (WCC) for beginning medical students at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons is scheduled for Friday, August 23, 2002. Returning to inspire a new generation of aspiring doctors and the faculty is Dr. Benjamin Carson, the charismatic pediatric neurosurgeon from Johns Hopkins Medical Center, who gave the first unforgettable WCC keynote speech at Columbia in 1993."
Nephron  T|C 17:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of WCCs
Talk:Whonamedit?

message: This needs references, how is it notable? 74.61.41.118 01:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This site is large enough to be notable. - Face 11:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Worth 4 dot test

message: The section in question says, "When questioned about the lights the patient will illicit [sic] a normal response..." Was that meant to be "elicit," or does this mean the patient is faking a normal response, in which case it still needs to be reworded? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 05:34, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abnormal retinal correspondence
Talk:Xanthelasma

message: is the oldest report that I can find that associates xanthelasma with high cholesterol. I cannot determine whether it is the first report, though. Help is welcome. JFW | T@lk 22:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Association with high cholesterol 

message: Won't these just reform over time?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.128.104 (talk) 23:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a small one on my left eyelid, a couple fo years ago I lost about 20lbs and reduced saturated fat in my diet. I looked just now and its gone. Stub Mandrel (talk) 14:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Surgical treatment
Talk:Yellow Card Scheme

message: Is it not not interesting that, until fairly recently, vaccine injury databases were considered a useful medical tool? Now, with growing reports of COVID vaccine side effects, the public are being told not to put that much trust in the Yellow Card Scheme. So might not the debate about the Covid - in relation to vaccine injury databases - make for a useful section?
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.215 (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In relation to COVID-19 vaccine
Talk:Lovejoy High School (Georgia)

message: The majority of college bound students from the class of 2006! That fact is not representative of anything more. Only about 5 kids from my class atteneded GSU, althouth I'm sure many more inteneded to.
Reply: Not sure who put that fact I left it in when rewording the article. Thanks for the info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.145.75.39 (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

message: The only way I could see the difference between a normal and @ 2601:C4:2:9F60:A9C8:6758:6E21:A821 (talk) 06:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only way I could
Talk:Things as They Are; or, The Adventures of Caleb Williams

message: I think its funny that an English-language book has a more complete Spanish version article than it does on the English wikipedia.  Anyway, I'm reading this book for a class and would be glad to expand it after I'm done reading.  --24.16.126.252 (talk) 22:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish Version 

message: An earlier, badly written version of this page attempted to provide a survey of critical views and historical contexts.--82.47.18.144 (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was summarily deleted without discussion, but I have restored it now. I realise that the policies on verifiability and original research are important, but it would be nice if we could try to see how much it is possible to improve the content, rather than just deleting the entire section. Celuici (talk) 13:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews of Caleb Williams
Talk:Imaging for Windows

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 16:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This app was previously bundled with Win 98. At the time it was branded under Kodak. --Voidvector (talk) 11:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows 98
Talk:The Brothers Solomon

message: A quick google on "have always been sheltered by their father"  and solomon shows a rather large number of (non-Wikipedia mirror) hits.  This is fishy, and strongly suggests that a substantial proportion, if not all, of the plot summary has simply been typed in or pasted from one of those other sites.  This isn't permitted by our site license, so I've removed the text.
Please feel free to provide a brief summary encompassing all significant parts of the plot. --Tony Sidaway 10:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:Cassandra's Dream

message: I added a link to improvised firearms for the words 'zip gun' in the plot section.  This was immediately removed and I cannot see why.  This seems to be a perfectly logical link to create as zip gun is not necessarily a well known concept.  I for one searched for the article not having heard the phrase before  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.62.46 (talk) 01:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zip Guns 

message: When will this film be out in the UK?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaia Octavia Agrippa (talk • contribs) 18:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britain date 

message: Can anyone write here that the story is loosely based on William Shakespeare's Macbeth? With a little knowledge of both plays it's obvious...—Preceding unsigned comment added by  83.24.56.50  (talk • contribs)  13:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that's essential, or even obvious, but rather subjective. If we're comparing this movie to Shakespeare plays, it reminds me most of "Richard III", but still not even enough that it should be mentioned. And, what do you mean by "both plays"?--Roscoe W. Chandler (talk) 02:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macbeth 
Talk:Streamline Merchant Services

message: Not the page creator, but I think speedy would be a little too quick here.  RBS usually doesn't spam Wikipedia.  In any case this may be something we merge to RBS instead of whacking right away.  Montco 16:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Placed a merge tag at the top of the article, but I doubt that it would be too controversial.  WIsh the creator hadn't pulled the speedy tag.  ALways yanks some credibility from a page for me if the creator can't bother to read the tag on the page.  Montco 16:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Girlguiding Bermuda

message: I'm not sure exactly what or who is depicted on the 10c and $1 stamps in the 1969 Girl Guide themed postage stamps from Bermuda. Does anyone know? Kingbird 16:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Appeal for information made on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philately Kingbird 05:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bermudian Stamps 
Talk:Ratz (comics)

message: Thanks for finding that review. I have still left the unreferenced tag there untill a link that supports the specific information in the article is given(we only release previously published information). This is not as urgent as showing the importance.
Thanks for contributing! HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...forgot to log in, that last update was mine. Comics UK Forum is a very useful source, at least where anything by Laura Howell (as was the case here), Nigel Parkinson or Lew Stringer is concerned, as they all post updates there (It's not the only place though). Digifiend (talk) 11:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  oops...
Talk:Khottabych

message: The film „Хоттабыч“ filmed in Russia, but in infobox table I found, that Country value is „USSR“. Sorry, but USSR not existing more than 15 years. Movie filmed last year (2006), so how it can be possible? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extate (talk • contribs) 
: Yeah, sure :) Just a mistake of mine... --Yuriy Lapitskiy 18:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  USSR? 

message: "a remake of the 1956 USSR film Starik Khottabych". Peter Tochin protests at this statement. Film is not "remake". It has original story.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.124.71.203 (talk) 04:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  remake