Talk:Gregg shorthand

message: What are diction machines and what does "Series 90 version" refer to?
: Series 90 was an edition of Gregg shorthand that was so dumbed down that you couldn't get very fast with it.  Dictation machnes are stenotypes and the like.  --Marlow4 21:00, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Which version of Gregg Shorthand is the picture of? DJ? I think it should be labelled more clearly. --80.2.207.196 12:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The example image 

message: Please add a definition of memory load as used in the article.  I did a cursory web search for a definition, and it is not easy to find immediately-- the results that came up were computer related.  Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.180.50 (talk) 01:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memory load? 

message: Currently, the introduction says " Like cursive longhand, it is completely based on elliptical figures and lines that bisect them. "
This seems an odd thing to say. Cursive longhand does not fit this description.
Ordinary Person (talk) 14:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cursive longhand comparison 

message: Here it is the only place, where you can read about it. Is it confirmed in any way? 
If anybody knows, where to find any informations of Polish derivate of Gregg system, please, send it on skolim@gmail.com
We are in project of development Polish shorthand inspired by Gregg. Thanks in advance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.174.63.19 (talk) 14:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In Leslie Cowan's book John Robert Gregg, on page 107: "His system was adapted to a large number of languages throughout the world during these years: French and German editions of the shorthand textbooks were published in 1924; Polish and Maltese appeared in 1926..." So this doesn't really help much, the year 1926 is the only additional information. --Ryhanen (talk) 19:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish derivate of Gregg shorthand? 

message: The same with Polish. I never found any mention of Russian version of Gregg shorthand, neither in English, nor in Russian-speaking Net. --Sindikat (talk) 09:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A German shorthand history book (Christian Johnen's Allgemeine Geschichte der Kurzschrift, 4th edition, 1940) mentions a Russian version by Akopjan (1933), but nothing more than the name and year. --Ryhanen (talk) 21:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: An adaptation by Frederick G. Fox and Louis List  (Stenografia Gregga) was published in 1935. Google finds some hits, but the book is probably very rare. -- Ryhanen (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian derivative 

message: I propose merging duplicate references. For example, the reference to "Gregg, Basic Principles, 16." would be a named reference and only appear once.  Any concerns?  I bring up this idea before implementation under WP:CITEVAR. DutchTreat (talk) 01:08, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge References 

message: All those refs for various versions belong, not in the Intro, but in the "Versions" part of the body. - Snori (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs in lIntro