lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Confrontation (Rackham)

message: * Confrontation - dictionary definition, nothing more. Fuzheado 00:09, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: I moved the previous content to Wiktionary. Optim 07:34, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary

message: This page could really do with some expansion and further information. The Warhammer pages contain tons of background info and helpful things like that, including races, geography, etc. If any can add similar information here (such as races, background story, etc) it would, in my opinion, add considerably to the article quality. Prophaniti 17:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: It seems the game has been discontinued in every sense. None of the sites behind external links (including the one to manufacturer's web site) is up any more (except for UK and Italian Conf'Federation of the Red Dragon sites). Maybe to add that note, and/or update the links accordingly. Aleks009 (talk) 08:32, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:Huckleberry Finn (disambiguation)

message: Why are there two articles about Huckleberry Finn? There's both Huckleberry finn and 'Huckleberry Finn'.
Somebody should at least change the title on the articles.
:Looks like its been taken care of. Propound 02:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why two different articles? 

message: "Huckleberry Finn, an opera, by Hall Overton commissioned by the Barney Jaffin Foundation, was presented by The Juilliard Opera Company just months before he died on November 24, 1972."
I think this sentence needs to be disambiguated. Is the "he" referring to the composer of the musical, or Twain? --xgravity23 02:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The same exact same sentence was written on the composer's page, so I removed it from this one. Unclear and no need to have it on both. Propound 10:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical 

message: I believe "Huckleberry Finn" should redirect to the book and this page should be "Huckleberry Finn (disambiguation)."  I've started a discussion at Talk:Adventures of Huckleberry Finn#Primary topic. (John User:Jwy talk) 05:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic
Talk:Sperner's lemma

message: Note to Axel - the other Lemma is an unrelated result proved earlier by Sperner, rather than the result of Borsuk et al.
Charles Matthews 09:07, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: For the 'other' Sperner lemma dealing with set systems, see antichain.
In fact, it's known as Sperner's theorem, not lemma, see Sperner family and my comments in Talk:antichain. Perhaps a disambiguation remark at the top would be appropriate.--192.35.35.36 00:15, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The other lemma

message: In the article it says at this time: "The vertices of T located on any given k-dimensional subface
::A_{i_1}A_{i_2}\ldots A_{i_k}
are colored[...]"
However, it should be (k-1) dimensional subface, or we should speak of k+1 points and colors. Am I wrong?
Joerg Bader (talk) 15:20, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note that the dimension of the whole simplex is n, not k. k is a free variable; it can be anything less than n. So offsetting its value by one makes no difference. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:25, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I understand. Maybe I'm missing something, but for any fixed k, 1<=k<=n, the k points here form a k-1 dimensional simplex/subface, I think. Joerg Bader (talk) 16:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, it's a mismatch between the number of points and the dimension of the subspace. Another way to fix it would be to start indexing the points at 0, I suppose... or, we don't really need the extra variable k because the condition only needs to be true for the (n-1)-dimensional faces (and the rest follow automatically). —David Eppstein (talk) 16:58, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dimension of a subface

message: What is the "degree of a triangle"?  I was able to find a definition of the degree of a vertex, but no luck with the degree of a triangle.  Without understanding the term, I do not find it to be "easily seen . . ."  Thanks.   Maurice Fox (talk) 00:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As the text at the start of the section describes, each triagle corresponds to a vertex in G. It is the degree of that vertex. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Ok.. it seem to be referring to the vertices of the triangle; if someone could label the image and find a citation for this proof that'd be grt MVDVPRSD (talk) 12:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Question's about the proof

message: One illustration's caption reads as follows:
"A random Sperner-colouring of a regular triangularisation. Each cul-de-sac is an RGB-triangle". 
That *might* be interesting or worth inclusion in Wikipedia — or not, it's hard to be sure.
Especially since a "random colouring" suggests that each vertex is coloured R, G, or B independently with 1/3 probability each.
But this says nothing about how the edges are determined.
Without a better reason for inclusion forthcoming, I hope that this illustration can be deleted from Wikipedia. 2601:200:C000:1A0:8936:A4D9:37CE:3D84 (talk) 02:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Random colouring" left unexplained
Talk:List of alphabets

message: I think it's important that we make a distinction between alphabets or scripts, and languages. For instance Sanskrit is a language, but there is no such thing as a Sanskrit script. Sanskrit has been written in many scripts over time including but not limited to: Brahmi, Gupta, Siddham, andDevanagari. mahābāla 10:59, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for making this point. I was considering removing those entries myself, but I wasn't sure it would be correct to do so (due to my lack of knowledge on the subject of Indian languages and scripts). -- uriber 11:08, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: Hi!  I was recently cleaning up the phonetic alphabet disambiguation page, and there were a lot of entries which were phonetic alphabets, but because they are unlikely to be the intended meaning of "phonetic alphabet" themselves, did not merit entry on teh disambiguation page.  The standard practice for such a situation is to move those entries to an appropriate list, and link to that list from there.
I do hope I haven't ruined the merger in adding the list here!
Also, I'm unable to adequately find a nice way to distinguish a linguistic phonetic alphabet from what I would call a "military" phonetic alphabet — if you know the correct terms, then please feel free to correct it.  I have left it as "phonetic alphabet (linguistics)" and "phonetic alphabets (military)" in the hope that this will be clear enough for most purposes, and that someone else can correct it.  (PS I'm not watching this page, so if you want to talk to me, get me on my user talk page.)  Neonumbers 10:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonetic alphabets
Talk:Hanns Kerrl

message: Hanns Kerrl was not President of the Reichstag; he was President of the Prussian Landtag. President of the Reichstag was Hermann Göring.
:It took one and a half years but I finally got round to correcting that apparent mistake. Thanks. <KF> 18:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To state, in "Career", that Bormann and Himmler were ideologues seems to me quite unconvincing and sourceless. Also the concept that Hitler was convinced to more extreme policies by other powerful Nazi leaders seems not to be agreed upon by many sources who put things the other way around. Carlotm (talk) 01:02, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideologue?
Talk:General Packet Radio Service

message: Question from a novice: How do I read the category "GPRS volume" on my mobile phone provider’s bill?
Which actions fall under this category? I would have guessed GPS (maps), but I also have a huge amount from one day where I only took pictures. --Bernburgerin (talk) 07:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: How do I read the category "GPRS volume" on my mobile phone provider’s bill
Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/November

message: you've mentioned "1947 - The United Nations General Assembly voted to approve the Partition Plan for Palestine, a plan to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict in the British Mandate of Palestine" please note that there was no "Israel" at that time  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.35.78.106 (talk) 02:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

message: قهق 203.171.112.126 (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  عسل خان سلام علیکم
Talk:Torg

message: Okay, okay, sorry but I have to say it: This game is absolutely awesome. You have to be careful about what to ignore; just take the basic set + world books and create your own campaign with it; the later official books were, sorry to say, mediocre to garbage. But the system, the setting -- they're absolutely cool. -- Nils Jeppe 18:30, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highly recommended 

message: Since I expect someone to challenge it: That TORG was once the working title meaning "The Other Roleplaying Game" is common wisdom in the industry.  This claim appears to be supported by this Usenet that claims to be from Ray Winninger, one of Torg's developers.  A message purporting to be from Scott Palter of West End Games claims other titles that were considered included  Shadow Wars, Shadow Spawn, Twilight Shadows, and Endless Earth. Alan De Smet | Talk 22:20, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim: TORG was originally The Other Roleplaying Game 

message: The links to WEG's site are both dead.  I imagine they've updated where things are by now.  I'll take a look, unless someone beats me to it.  Nimbex 15:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Links to WEG 

message: It is worth mentioning here the ultimate fate of Torg (as copied from the West End Games article): "West End Games is currently selling off all of their properties and working to close down operations. TORG was sold to a German game company, Ulisses Spiele."
I think the fact that a major German gaming company (Das Schwarze Auge is huge in Germany, and they released the German version of Pathfinder) was interested in specifically acquiring the rights to Torg helps reinforce the idea that it is notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article.  71.229.72.185 (talk) 18:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well, regardless of all the above discussion,
Talk:Cucumbertree

message: Cucumbertree is the correct usage, not cucumber tree.  Also, tree names ARE NOT CAPITALIZED unless they start with a proper name.  Tree names are not bird names.  This has already been extensively discussed. jaknouse 15:55, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked, the most recent authoritative monograph on the Magnoliaceae (Magnolias and their allies, ed. D. Hunt; International Dendrology Society & Magnolia Society, 1998) gives Cucumber Tree. And Tulip Tree. MPF 16:21, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Atman

message: Talk:Atman/Archive01
Atman is the true Self (notice the capitalization)that lies beneath the ego. Under the ego lies the transpersonal absolute, Brahman. Atman is hidden by the ego, but once one can rid himself of his ego he can realize the Atman within him and understand that he is God, for God is everything according to hinduism.
This article is a disambiguation article, whereas the paragraph above is a doctrinal statement that belongs to Atman (Hinduism), if it belongs anywhere on Wikipedia. I am not an expert in Hinduism, but I doubt that the paragraph above begins to reflect the views of all Hindus.  I leave that to the author of said paragraph and the editors of Atman (Hinduism). (20040302)
the pages should be merged again. The Hindu and Buddhist concepts are clearly related. Disambiguation pages are for unrelated concepts that just happen to be spelled the same. Of course there are differences, and these can be addressed in separate Hindu and Buddhist sections, or even sub-articles. dab (ᛏ) 10:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a clear enough difference in explanation of the self. For Hindus, it's the immortal self, that goes into reincarnation. For buddhist, it's made up of skandhas. And does not get into reborn. Keep it as it is. The merging would only fuel the confusion of the term. Monkey Brain(untalk) 16:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Magnolia acuminata

message: Google hits:
Cucumber tree 120,000
 2,000
(see also Talk:Cucumbertree for more discussion)
It should perhaps be noted that searching on google for "cucumber tree" only returns ~3000 hits. i.e. many of the hits when searching for 'cucumber tree' without the quotes are pages which mention both the words cucumber and tree but not one after the other. --Ams80 20:47, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Template talk:New Religious Movements

message: This is an issue that has not been resolved and really needs to.
* "Cult" is a subjective term that can apply to any group, depending on which group or individual you ask - inclusion of groups in the template is contentious, since the term, as used by the Chtistian countercult movement, the anti-cult movement, and assorted "specialists" is usually used in a negative context.
* "Cult" has also been used historically
* Cult and NRMs are not interchangeable terms
The template should be renamed "New religious movements" and all references to cult should be moved to a separate template (or templates, since the definition varies so vastly) 
Zambelo (talk) 07:28, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Note there are problems with organising anything under the term "cult" per se so I wouldn't recommend creating a new template under that name, see some recent history here. HelenOnline 07:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bringing this up again. NRM ≠ Cult
File talk:Ptable-MainPage.png

message: Reverted because new image was larger, had artefacts, and the shadow faded to white only.
:Ed g2s 19:51, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, I never realized there was so much to it (except for size.) Thanks for reverting though, and I'll make sure of considering these issues next time (Maybe I should revisit the guidelines.) --AY 03:00, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Veljekset Keskinen

message: So what makes this store so special really? "its size despite its very remote location": What size is that? How remote is Tuuri? -- Kimiko 21:20, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It is literally a very small place indeed (not in the top 50 anyway; conceivably not in the top 100 biggest towns). The department store is on the order of the biggest in the whole country. This article definitely needs work, but a worthy subject, nevertheless. -- Cimon Avaro on a pogostick 21:46, Feb 28, 2004 (UTC)
Where is this "over 5m customers" from? www.tuuri.fi isn't an accurate source for this. that's like using Apple Co. as a source for a statement saying "98% of the world's computers are Macs". Please find another source for the figure, as I personally doubt that there are 5 million customers per year (there's only 5,3m people in Finland, plus maybe some 0,5m tourists per year; not every finn goes to that shop every year). 5 million visits to the shop is a completely different thing to having 5 million customers. In 5 millions visits, 100 000 people living nearby can do 80%+ of them), meaning there might only be around 200 000 or so different customers.--85.49.227.162 04:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Here is the source: http://www.mek.fi/web/stats/Publish.nsf/(pages)/Kavijamaarat?OpenDocument from the Finnish Tourist Board. Veljekset Keskinen is the most popular tourist attraction in Finland. -- Jniemenmaa 07:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Tom Waddell

message: Is this the Tom Waddell that the transgender clinic is named after? -- Kimiko 21:26, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On April 3 2008, the copyright article Building a Gay Sports Legacy: The Story of Tom Waddell was pasted into this article (diff). I've rolled the article back to the last version that includes no copyvio content. --Muchness (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio problem
Talk:Combtooth blenny

message: I was actually going to write this article later tonight; it's a ridiculously complex subject, and even a bit of preliminary research was discouraging enough.
There are actually several families whose members share the name "blenny"; it's about as specific as calling something a "minnow". Even the name "sabre-toothed blenny" is hardly standard and not confined to one species. Ah well.. I'll try to sort it out later. -- Hadal 23:03, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: I deleted the old one since it didn't have any source or copyright info, so putting in a request for a new one. --Sherool (talk) 19:53, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could use a new image 
Talk:Barton-upon-Humber

message: This is a home page for the town  http://www.bartonuponhumber.org.uk
Where did the information about Carr and Huntley come from?  I believe they have connections to Barton, but their flat was in Barrow on Humber, 3 miles away.  212.240.35.82 14:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This name was added to the 'notable people' section: "David Paul Mason MBE born 1974 Royal Marines 1992 till 2020". I can find no secondary references linking Mason to Barton, but a partial biography is here. Should additional sources linking him to Barton turn up, he can be added in.Zakhx150 (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Mason
Talk:Deltahedron

message: If somebody could find/generate an image with all of the deltahedrons displayed, that would make this page far more useful and comprehensible.Matt gies 23:46, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Image?

message: Any proof that we can't have an 18-face deltahedron where some vertexes have 5 and some have 4?? Georgia guy (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's easy to list all the topologies with valences <6; none of them have 11 vertices. —Tamfang (talk) 05:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  18-faced deltahedron 
Talk:Godfrey Kneller

message: Below text from article at Sir Godfrey Kneller; put here in case it has anything that should be incorporated into the Godfrey Kneller article. -- Infrogmation 00:36, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yi Cha-ch'un

message: Yi Jachun's claim of the Jeonju Yissi lineage is suspicious. He can traced back to only few generations whose existence are confirmed. He have a Mongolian name and some of his relatives are only known by Mongolian name. In addition, Shuangcheng was traditionally Jurchen land, and he had Jurchen followers. Some even claims that Yi Jachun was Jurchen, but I doubt it. --Nanshu 01:46, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ramen

message: The American market for ramen was heavily influenced by servicemen returning from duty in Southeast Asia. Military personnel were exposed to a very tasty and inexpensive form of nourishment that was easy to prepare. It was also lightweight and compact for packing out to the field to supplement rations. All one needed was a canteen cup and heat tabs and you had a hot meal. Some even cracked open claymore mines to get the C4 explosive to burn as fuel. When troops returned home they sought sources in Asian markets and importers, the rest is economics of supply and demand. 2600:1700:4270:8E60:249C:AA:8531:65AD (talk) 17:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be the content regarding instant noodles. Ramen is Japanese fresh noodles. 薔薇騎士団 (talk) 07:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  American market
Talk:Aftermath of World War I

message: or just an oscure word, because I've only seen "economic". Herostratus (talk) 01:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Economical with the truth"? It's common enough but used incorrectly in the article, so I fixed it. Selfstudier (talk) 06:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --Herostratus (talk) 01:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "Economical" a Britishism?
Talk:North African campaign

message: There is a lot of detail in Military history of the United Kingdom during World War II this is not here, or in the related articles. It would be a nice task for someone to expand these articles based on that (without the UK focus of course). DJ Clayworth 20:54, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Military history of the United Kingdom

message: I am in concern. I love you. 24.22.207.72 (talk) 23:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  To the people 

message: The map of the Italian Empire in 1942 includes Tunisia. Is this accurate? Far as I know Tunisia was under Vichy control until Germany occupied Vichy France, late in 1942. The Tunisia article does not mention being temporarily part of the Italian Empire. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian Tunisia? 

message: A huge vandalism occurred a while ago made by Matildahuks. Italy is the main Axis power in North Africa. The German forces was put under Italian command. And The Deutches Afrika Korps was just a contingent to support the Italian war efforts in North Africa. Regards Jheeeeeeteegh (talk) 02:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I already restore the old and Right version. Not by Matildahuks proposition to his/her Pro-German POV. Regards Jheeeeeeteegh (talk) 02:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The so-called "German North African Campaign"
Talk:Black cardamom

message: Is there a reference for the name  Cardamomum amomum for brown cardamom? Even if it has ever been valid, if it is not now it should be labelled as a synonym. -- WormRunner 03:17, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Multiple sources including products and recipes refer to black cardamom as 'big'.  Not sure why this was reverted?  There is a source provided [[[Special:Contributions/86.11.51.106|86.11.51.106]] (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Big''' Cardamom

message: Is this spice smoked?  I just bought a package for the first time and it smells strongly of smoke, and tastes that way too.  Badagnani 20:28, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Smoked?

message: That warning from the back of one package kind of warrants some kind of explanation. Is it dangerous to eat raw (smoked)?
Swooch (talk) 11:15, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Poisonous uncooked?

message: Hi! I'm a bit confused. Is cǎoguǒ () Amomum costatum? The Plant List says Amomum costatum is a synonym of Hornstedtia costata. Amomum tsao-ko article says cǎoguǒ () is Amomum tsao-ko. --Brett (talk) 11:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: ; associating cǎoguǒ with Amomum costatum appears to be an error. For that matter, so does associating Amomum costatum with "black cardamom". Other Amomum species may occasionally be used as spices, but none seem to be as important as A. subulatum. Plantdrew (talk) 21:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cǎoguǒ 

message: I propose a merge of Amomum_tsao-ko to this page Gak (talk) 12:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: In the first line, it states that this species is also named 'Indian cardamom', but then in the first line of the Characteristics section, it clearly states that 'Indian cardamom' is a different species (the green one). 
Can anyone clarify which one it is, or make a note if both are referred to in this way? 
FlowerFaerie087 (talk) 10:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name (Part 2)
Talk:Interstate 295

message: How does "D. C. area" differ from Virginia? RickK 04:24, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two separate I-295s, one near the Capitol Beltway and one near Richmond. Gregory Pietsch
Ah.  Thanks.  RickK 23:06, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm trying to think of a name for a Wikipedia article that is about more than one thing being put together simply because they share a name rather than because they are related. How common is it for an encyclopedia to have an article like this?? Several articles on Interstates, as well as Maroon and New York, New York (song) are this kind. 66.245.71.17 01:41, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, they are related, as they are all spurs off I-95. I have no objection to splitting it though (Interstate 295 (Florida), Interstate 295 (Virginia), etc). I won't split it though because I don't feel strongly and I don't want to have to change links.--SPUI 03:15, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multi-topic article