lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peters Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania

message: The full quote from the article is McMurray Road has the most car crashes in Pennsylvania averaging one wreck a week.  I tagged that for references needed.  I used to volunteer for the ambulance service in Peters Twp.  Yes, I remember many accidents on McMurray Road.  However, I'd like to see a verifiable source confirm that this road has had the most accidents in all of Pennsylvania.  DeeKenn 14:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  McMurray Road averages one wreck a week 

message: Please change the population count to 21,213, which is the latest census estimate (2010).
see latest census info - http://www.peterstownship.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={3EB7A31A-2E2E-4679-BED2-6E67D01FDA90}
Thanks!
Kbabcock (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Topher385 (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Kbabcock, 4 September 2011
Talk:Buckeye, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Dillon, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Holland, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Industry, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article
Talk:Lyona, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Pearl, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Shady Brook, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:10, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Menngagde

message: We seem to be missing the list of texts in the Instruction Division.
I know there is a list in Thondup, 'The Practice of Dzogchen' and probably in Namkhai Norbu 'The Supreme Source' Zero sharp 14:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Texts

message: I suggest changing the spelling to men-ngak-dé, which is (1) the THDL standard, (2) not impossible to pronounce, and (3) not nearly as prone to typos as "menngagde" (which keeps coming out "mengagde"). Arthur chos (talk) 11:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: This section needs a better summary of the separate article. Skyerise (talk) 17:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Seventeen tantras]] section
Talk:Stoney, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article
Talk:Sutphen, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Nuclear receptor co-repressor 2

message: Nobody calls it NCOR2. Whoever changed this page clearly has little connection with the field of nuclear receptor coregulators. Generic annotation is the curse of modern biology
* This page's name was not changed to but rather created with the NCOR2 name.  At the same time, a redirect page from SMRT to NCOR2 was created and a definition of what SMRT stands for was included in the article since I was aware that the SMRT acronym is frequently used in the nuclear receptor literature.  The main reason that the generic annotation was for consistency with other web pages (see for example transcription coregulator) and to avoid edit wars between competing research groups "who would sooner share toothbrushes than protein names" ;-)  Cheers.  Boghog2 15:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Mount Longhu

message: Longhushan is a group of hills, not a mountain. The name inscribed onto the World Heritage (China Danxia) List is Longhushan, so this article should move to Longhushan.--Zhangzhugang (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Charvil

message: I really question whether Charvil has been a village for hundreds of years - it was mostly farmland and related building even in the 1950's.  I know we have no exact "size" definitions of villages, towns, etc. but one definition is "A small group of dwellings in a rural area, usually ranking in size between a hamlet and a town."  By this definition, I would not have classed Charvil as a village until the 19th century. Ambitus 15:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. John's Preparatory School (Queens)

message: This is a start on your school article. Further advice is available at the school project page.
1. Add some topics (like history, notable alumni, etc)
2. Keep adding references
3. Add pictures
4. Ask for an assessment at the schools project.EagleFan 15:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Upland, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Toni Fisher

message: Article claims Toni Fisher used "miss" because
her voice might be mistaken as a man's voice.
This is false; Miss Fisher's voice could not ever
be taken as a man's voice. Maybe there was indeed
a motive to be labeled "miss" , but the sound of the
voice would not be it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.13.202 (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article Wayne Shanklin does not mention anything about Toni Fisher having been his wife. Some websites, like discogs.com, possibly taking it from Wikipedia state he was her husband. Findagrave.com states "In the early fifties she married composer / arranger /producer Wayne Shanklin", and further down: "She spent the rest of the sixties doing club dates and retired from the music scene after the death of her husband in 1970". However, our article on Shanklin states: "His secretary, Victoria Hamway, worked right alongside him and in 1964, they were married" and then we state that he was survived by "wife Vicki". I have also found complains made from an alleged member of her family about Wikipedia stating that Shanklin had been Toni's husband. The information seems conflicting. Out of doubt, I have removed the statement until we can be sure it reflects real events. Alternatively we could state that "according to this or that source" he had been her husband. Hoverfish Talk 14:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Wayne Shanklin
Template talk:Tour de France young rider classification winners

message: This template is usually called as
 
 
 
  
Which currently renders as
 
 
with an extra empty box at the bottom.
I think it should be simply called as
 
 
which currently gives
 
Can somebody easily change all the template calls? Or change the code such that the first way works?--Pie.er 15:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done SeveroTC 23:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Northern Celestial Masters

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
--Redtigerxyz (talk) 12:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div> jackturner3 (talk) 14:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the recent changes, I hereby promote this article. -- jackturner3 (talk) 15:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review
Talk:Professional corporation

message: A copyright violation template is now on this article.  Much material (some deleted now) from this article constructed by earlier editor(s) has been plagiarized from what were unidentified sources; the article lacks citations to a glossary definition from nolo.com from which it appears to have taken material.  I added this item in a new EL section so that comparisons can be made between this "article" and that glossary definition posted in that site, which is copyrighted.  I've added this article to the copyright violations noticeboard.  [Also deleted strange unsigned, undated material from this talk page.] --NYScholar (talk) 22:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism from source used by earlier editors
Talk:Macanese Portuguese

message: I'm not sure the fluency statistics listed here are accurate. The current link the source is broken, but a working version can be found here. Both the New York times article and this source mention that 5000 students had been enrolled in learning Portuguese, but no figures were given as to the total percentage of speakers. 
http://cultura.gov.tl/sites/default/files/MLeach_Talking_portuguese_2007_08.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.201.255 (talk) 02:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fluency figures in dispute  

message: See the lead section: "Macanese Portuguese is spoken, to some degree either natively or as a second language, by roughly 1% of the population of Macau." Then see the "History" section: "Because most Macau people speak Cantonese, Portuguese, and Mandarin, they are able to code-switch between these languages." These disagree. Can only 1% of the Macanese population speak Portuguese, or can most of them speak Portuguese? 2603:8081:4C00:13D9:1C6B:D8B7:A0CC:90B6 (talk) 06:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused
Talk:Convoy SC 7

message: I’ve changed things round a bit, as the current text has the timings wrong; at least, they are different from the sources I’ve used; I don’t know what sources were used originally.
I’ve used Lund and Ludlums book, as it is specifically about this event; Roskill is the official history, and the others are both fairly comprehensive.Xyl 54 16:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-written this bit as a conclusion; if anyone is unhappy about it, please let me know. Xyl 54 16:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major edit

message: I’ve changed the word  "Decisive" from the designation as a German Victory, because very few battles are truly decisive, usually one or maybe two in a campaign; as far as the battle of the Atlantic goes, the decisive battle, if there was one single engagement that qualifies, was probably ONS 5.
SC 7 was a substantial/major defeat for the Allies, but I don’t see how it decided anything.
Donitz and BdU were no doubt pleased that their pack attack tactics were effective, but they were already committed to them; SC 7 didn’t decide that.
As for the allies, SC 7 and the contiguous defeat HX 79 didn’t persuade them to abandon convoy as a strategy, or the convoy system.
I am mindful this issue has already caused an edit war ( or at least an edit scuffle), so I am laying out my reasons for the change to clarify the issue.Xyl 54 16:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Decisive?

message: Changed the name of one of the combatants to Germany. "Nazi Germany" never existed as an official name. 
--Vosselmans 10:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edit 

message: There's been some confusion over the numbers of combatants in this battle, which changed throughout.
There were 7 U-boats involved, though not all were present at the same time;
U's-48,-38, -46,-99,-100,-101, and -123. U-124 sank a straggler from the convoy, but wasn’t involved in the battle itself.
There were 5 escort ships (again, not all present at once); the sloops Scarborough, Fowey and Leith, and the corvettes Bluebell and Heartsease. They're all mentioned in the text.I hope that clarifies matters. Xyl 54 12:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers
Talk:East Timorese Portuguese

message: *Although in the text this is said to be a Brazilian feature as opposed to Portugal, that is not the case. It occurs in Portugal. No-one here would find odd if one said "eu te amo". In fact, this is used in Brazil and elsewhere for some reason. Isnt that true?!--Pedro (talk) 16:06, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Eu te amo
Talk:Ferroelasticity

message: Can someone please tell me why those links won't stay on separate lines?! It's driving me nuts! - EndingPop 15:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No line between "See Also" links 

message: *Rubbery Metal
Too bad, sounds interesting!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.221.56.7 (talk) 15:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link
Talk:Terminal value (finance)

message: The definition of Enterprise value in this article and in the article about Enterprise value don't seem to correspond. Why? At least one of the articles must clearly be adjusted. The question is only which one and how. --Smallchanges 15:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Enterprise value? 

message: Somehow it doesn't make sense to me that "g" would be subtracted from "k" in the Perpetuity Growth Model. It seems much more natural to simply divide the cash flow with "(1+k/100)^n" to get the present value of a future cash flow. Or am I missing something? --Smallchanges 16:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The perpetuity growth model is consistent with most texts on the subject. Mathmatically this formula is incorrect however.  For a stable growth rate business, the equation is correctly stated at CFn/(((1+k)/(1+g))-1)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.74.20.14 (talk) 15:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perpetuity Growth Model
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Boricuaeddie

message: Hi. Can somebody please add the link below to the RfA? I can't do it, 
presumably since this RfA was speedy deleted in the past and I can't handle that. Thanks!
*See Boricuaeddie's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
Mathbot 16:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Boricuaeddie 17:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A bot request
Talk:The Andrew Marr Show

message: Perhaps we should add something about the London skyline backdrop? Headhitter (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  London skyline
Talk:Poultry by-product meal

message: This article was recreated with references and a better read. It is a common food product for pets as is fish meal and other ingredients. Noles1984 15:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Administrators