Talk:Nobuyoshi Araki

message: I took this picture http://www.flickr.com/photos/torek/4644997712/ at his 70th birthday. I released it as Creative Commons on my Flickr. It would be nice if it would be useful here in this article about him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.233.170.106 (talk) 14:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I'll be doing some editing to this page over the next few days.  if anyone has any input, hit me on my Talk page --Michaelcoyote 02:13, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe that araki's wife died of a malignant tumor in the uterus. The cancer later spread. That would not constitute as ovarian cancer. You may want to check the details on this one. ...... posted at 22:05, 13 February 2006 by 24.161.100.171
In a swedish exhibition, a sign stated that his wife died from suicide.. I believe she hanged herself. This is important to get right though, so please, someone, find a source.--84.217.125.213 01:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  error 

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: The article tells us:
:Akaki [sic!] was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2008, and has since undergone surgery which successfully removed the tumor. / After he was diagnosed with cancer [...] he said he began to take photographs of flowers [. . .].
Araki published books of photographs of flowers as far back as 1996/97; see pp 280, 282, 283 of A Book of Araki Books. -- Hoary (talk) 13:54, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I didnt mean to say that he never photographed flowers before. In the interview he said that he began to take photographs of flowers, which shall be presented at his furneral instead of real flowers. Thats something different.87.162.72.40 (talk) 17:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I'm sorry that I misinterpreted what was written before, but I think that you will agree that it was potentially ambiguous. Now, where did you read what he said about his funeral? -- Hoary (talk) 01:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Watched a tv-feature named "tracks" about Araki on German/France TV-station "arte", earlier this year. [] (please don't be confused by the videos there, they are only additionally information for the viewers, they are not what they did broadcast). 87.162.121.110 (talk) 14:30, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

text: I found something else here http://www.nipponlugano.ch/en/podcast/araki-highlights.xml have a look at "chapter 6", the last few seconds of the video. Probably not "good enough as reference", but for your information, and maybe somebody finds a "better source".87.162.64.47 (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Flowers well before 2008

message: Lopifalko, a small point on this edit (otherwise good): if somebody hears that an exhibition took place in New York, would it be normal for them to think "Hmmm, wonder where? Rochester, White Plains?"? (As for me, I'd have thought that they'd have thought NYC unless the context had suggested otherwise.) -- Hoary (talk) 23:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hoary, there was a policy recommendation to use New York City in place of New York. I have tried so can link to it but cannot, sorry. I have been blindly applying that rule everywhere but your recommendation here appears to be a more nuanced and sensible interpretation.-Lopifalko (talk) 10:33, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: New York

message: I have removed the sexual abuse allegations because they were poorly sourced to blogs. Theroadislong (talk) 07:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  sexual abuse allegations 

message: I've tagged the controversy section for POV, as it has repeatedly had badly written non-neutral content added by a Japanese IP. Don't remove it until this is resolved.104.163.159.237 (talk) 23:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given, I have removed the POV tag. 153.230.238.91 (talk) 23:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: nice that you actually replied after I have left you numerous messages. The first issue is that your edit adds speculative statements on the effect of his actions. My edit does not. Second, your writing in English is poor.104.163.159.237 (talk) 23:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you tell me which sentence you think is speculative? 153.230.238.91 (talk) 23:41, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section