lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

message: If anyone has the drive, the first good thing to do here would be adding more cases (and their refs, because I'm sure if someone has the time, they're easy to find on EUR-lex. Wikidea 12:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I would add in the intro after Its core role is the regulation of monopolies, which restrict competition in private industry and produce worse outcomes for consumers and society [...] that those worse outcomes happen only if certain conditions are verified. As shown by Williamson , if the MC is lowered by an horizontal merger, the monopoly can lower the price, thus benefiting consumers and society. --Lucaccino (talk) 17:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: I aim to edit the subheading of dominance. I long to give a more detailed discussion in to the three criteria, as given by the Commission's Guidance, in finding whether an undertaking is dominant on the market. My edit will be based heavily upon discussion of the Commission's Guidance as well as recent and relevant case law. 
Charlottehassall (talk) 10:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominance 

message: I would like to insert a more in-depth analysis for the meaning, abuse of dominance. I aim to give a detailed discussion with supporting references towards the definition of abuse, along with how the abuse is identified and the steps taken from the Commission from a per se illegality to effects-based approach giving a critical analysis of the approach given by the European Union. --David12435 (talk) 10:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abuse of Dominance  

message: I plan on expanding the 'Single Market Abuse' section by sub-dividing it into the two main categories: pricing practices and non-pricing practices. Then, I will add some new cases to enforce the existing information and its significance to the law, as well as introduce some new information with citations to EURLEX and academic books. AndreiN16 (talk) 11:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is, my mistake - I have expanded that section now AndreiN16 (talk) 14:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single Market Abuse 

message: It appears that this draft is actually a proposal to expand a section of this article.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is, my mistake - I have expanded that section now AndreiN16 (talk) 14:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Draft:Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union]]

message: I struggled to understand this article, and I'm an educated adult. Is there a way it could be rewritten to be more easily readable? I saw this in the commmunity portal area for articles that need help.--MaxineJP (talk) 19:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  too hard to read
Talk:James Chin Moody

message: FYI: James is no longer working at the CSIRO but is now founder of Sendle.com. I have a conflict of interest so cannot make the edits myself.
Here's some source material
* http://www.businessinsider.com.au/australia-post-parcel-disrupter-sendle-has-just-raised-another-5-million-2016-8
* https://www.fullyloaded.com.au/industry-news/1608/sendle-expands-presence-across-regional-nsw
* http://www.startupsmart.com.au/advice/growth/door-to-door-delivery-just-got-a-little-cheaper-for-small-businesses-sending-500g-parcels-in-the-post/
* http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2016/07/sendle-adds-satchel-parcel-option-for-smbs-sending-small-items/
* http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/business/parcel-delivery-service-sendle-in-stoush-with-australia-post/news-story/01e323d9d61008f308af5556b62f4da1
* http://www.afr.com/technology/small-business-delivery-startup-sendle-raises-5-million-20160803-gqjshv
* http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2015/12/14/small-business-success-story-sendles-green-parcel-delivery/
* http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/business-it/memo-to-australia-post-sendle-has-arrived-20150813-giypcs.html
* http://www.afr.com/technology/sendle-challenges-australia-post-on-po-box-delivery-20151106-gksg5z
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.99.116.244 (talk) 03:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sendle
Talk:Rutog Town

message: The pages should not be merged.
Reading the content of both pages, the entry for Rudok (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudok) is describing the older, Tibetan village, whereas that for Rutog / 日土县 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutog_Town) describes the much newer Chinese settlement.  Rutog lies on the G219; Rudok a few kilometres off it.  The Lonely Planet guide to Tibet 7th edition pp 237 - 238 provides an accurate description of the two places. 
I visited Rudok and drove through Rutog on 18 August 2010. 
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/maryloosemore/archives/date-taken/2010/08/18/page2/
This is my first contribution to a talk page. I hope it's appropriate.
Maryloosemore (talk) 15:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides the fact that the page contains some wrong information (for example population data) and also outdated information, the main problem is that after the merging done on 22 April 2011 with Rudok, the article is mixing information about "Old Rudok" and "New Rudok", which are two distinct villages located about 10km away, as mentioned by Maryloosemore. I think we should either split again the two articles, or create two different sections describing both new and old Rudok separately. I am volunteering to make the necessary corrections, but I'm not sure what is the best option. --Pseudois (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Another issue is the article title. Rudok (created on 13 February 2006) was merged into Rutog (created on 13 September 2007) without discussion on which is the most common English name. Despite its small size, Rudok has an important historical significance and is known in English publications since at least the 19th century. The historical prevalence of Rudok over Rutog can be seen in this chart. An analysis of the last 10 years shows that Rudok is still apprimately 10 times more frequent than Rutog. In case that we keep both new and old Rudok/Rutog in the same article, then I would suggest to move back to the original article "Rudok". A third spelling (Rutok) is popular in English language guidebooks and should also be added but probably not as article title.--Pseudois (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am just (re)discovering this discussion 8 years later (I am the same person as Pseudois above). I will simply undo the redirect. --Dominique Roux (talk) 15:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging and title name
Talk:Bronte Creek Provincial Park

message: I want to add quite a few sections to this article to round it out and make it, well not a stub.  I created the discussion page, so that if anyone would like to contribute or suggest anything else, it can be done.
1. New sections: History, Geology, Trails, Recreation (Play Barn, Nature Centre, Spure Lane Farm House, etc.), Camping.
2. Pictures for the top box and rest of the article.
3. Links for references and linking to other articles.
If anyone has anything else they think that should be added to the list or changed, please leave a comment here.  Zemalia 13:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not just be bold and add the info to the article? --Doradus (talk) 23:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A good suggstion, but it appears Zemalia has not been active lately (last edits are from Dec 2007).  I think I shall dig around some and see what can be done about an expansion. -- Whpq (talk) 11:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Additions to the Article
Talk:Living With a Star

message: I think LWS is an international programme that NASA is participating in (or possibly leading), not just a NASA project. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 16:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NASA programme

message: I updated this section to match NASA's current LWS Missions page. I don't know why my browser submitted the change before I was done typing the summary. Fedos (talk) 17:39, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated Spaceflight Segment
Talk:Godzilla (disambiguation)

message: I'm new to editing Wikipedia, and my addition to this article is my first edit. I didn't know that there is an editing guide, and am unsure if the edit is satisfactory. If it isn't, point out any problems to me and I will either try to fix them or remove the addition if it's beyond saving. 
Kind Regards 
   - Yet Another Dragon
P.S. I added the section on the Luminous Blue Variable star in "Other Uses". Yet Another Dragon (talk) 04:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for that addition. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is my edit okay?
Talk:Thuis

message: What is the point of this article on English Wikipedia?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.198.246.199 (talk) 22:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest move to Dutch Wikipedia 

message: Some notes on reviewing the article:
*The biggest issue is that the article is unsourced.  This makes it difficult to verify what is true, what is notable and what is trivia.
*The next issue is article length.  It is almost double the maximum recommended article size.  I would recommend splitting the season-by-season plots into a separate article and the long cast list into another separate article.  The main article could then have a more-concise summary of each, allow room for expansion on other aspects of the show (e.g.: production, reception, etc.), and be more easily navigable.
*MOS:TVPLOT recommends no more than 500 words of plot summary for each season.  I tried to use more-concise language but a few of them still need trimming of less-notable storylines.  Remember that these should be summaries and not cover every aspect or every character.
*The cast list seems to be more about the characters, and restates information from the plot.  This should be more about their real-world notability and the actor's notability in the role.  Also, listing episode numbers is to be avoided, seasons or years is sufficient. For the table of current cast, it can be assumed that all the dates extend to the present (otherwise they wouldn't be "current").
*I was a bit confused as there were two sections for "Season 21". Someone knowledgable should check the season numbering.
*In the cast list, some of the character and actor names seem to be switched around. Also, at the end of the list there are characters mentioned for single episodes, which hardly seems like notable appearances for a 20+ year series.
*I am posting below the "Opening titles" section, which is redundant with the Cast section but may help in trimming it down.  These are the main cast characters and the only ones which should appear in those tables.
Good luck. – Reidgreg (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: This is the "Opening titles" section from the article which was redundant with the Cast section but may help in trimming it down.  If these are the main cast characters, then only these should appear in the tables. – Reidgreg (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening titles
Talk:Peugeot (cycling team)

message: *Hippolyte Aucouturier
*Louis Trousselier
*René Pottier
*Lucien Petit-Breton
*Philippe Thys
*Eugène Christophe
*Firmin Lambot
*Stan Ockers
*Roger Walkowiak
*Rik Van Steenbergen
*Charly Gaul
*Jean de Gribaldy
*Ferdi Kübler
*Pino Cerami
*Tom Simpson
*Roger Pingeon
*Eddy Merckx
*Walter Godefroot
*Ferdinand Bracke
*Bernard Thevenet
*Hennie Kuiper
*Pascal Simon
*Phil Anderson
*Gilbert Duclos-Lassalle
*Robert Millar
*Stephen Roche
*Allan Peiper
*Graham Jones
*Sean Yates
*Ronan Pensec
I've moved this list from the article as there is no criteria for it and until there is it should be left here. BaldBoris 15:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous cyclists from the team
Talk:Orthopedic pillow

message: This article has no references, and the "Spinal Health" section reads like chiropractic propaganda.  I believe there are other professionals who feel that the pillows are helpful, for more generally accepted reasons.  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 13:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 23:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Ruth Jordan

message: This person is probably not notable enough to have an entire article in Wikipedia, but I was a little surprised that a search turned up nothing.  Not notable outside the Tyco trial, so I redirected there. --Jaysweet 13:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following was included with the deprodding. "https://azmemory.azlibrary.gov/digital/collection/shsjordan/id/25/. Also covered in Grand Endeavors: Vintage Arizona Quilts and Their Makers, and author of Through the Camera Lens of a One Room School Teacher". It looks like searching might show up some workable sources, maybe.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources?
Talk:Chapel-le-Dale

message: The suggestion that the name derives from old French looks spurious to me. First of all the word "Dale" isn't French and "Chapel" is as likely to be English as French - only "le" gives the suggestion of French origin. As the article says though, the name was first recorded as "Chapell ith Dale" i.e. Chapel i' th' Dale, which is simply a contraction in the common Yorkshire manner of "Chapel in the Dale" - the "le" then arises from running the "l" in "chapel" onto the "i". Northern rocks 08:45, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name
Talk:Cayton

message: Would anybody be interested in adding a bit of info to the article about the Britain in Bloom poisoning scandal in 2010? It's probably worthy of mention as it has gained national headlines and rather strange that the suspect is believed to be from Cayton themselves. Here's some links to get you started
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jun/02/flowerbeds-britain-in-bloom-poison
* http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/york_and_north_yorkshire/10199041.stm
I'd also like to point out that the article is a little bit on the messy side, with random dates and facts simply strung together. Might be best if Cayton Bay is added as a new section and maybe something like "Cayton in the news/media" for the landslip and plant poisoning? Thanks anyway --Georgebrown92 (talk) 00:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britain in Bloom sabotage
Talk:The Mildenhall Treasure

message: I haven't read this for a long time so it's not clear to me if the explanation is just the fictionalised account in the book of how he came by the story but it reads here in this Wiki article as if it's true. 
He can't have been at any RAF base in England just before he became a fighter pilot as he was out of the UK entirely from 1938 (some sources say earlier) to 1941 and he was a fighter pilot in 1940-1941 (primarily in the Mediterranean theatre)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.237.234.221 (talk) 14:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roald Dahl fighter pilot
Talk:Metal corset

message: Just noting that an article rescue and total rewrite has been carried out as of September 2015. The previous article was extremely unacceptable, including serious copyvio. Mabalu (talk) 13:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up performed
Talk:UMB World Three-cushion Championship

message: The table needs player nationalities, e.g. . — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 13:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: Remove the flag icons from the Venue column. It's against MOS:ICONS; we only use flag icons to identify sport/player sporting nationality (what place they're formally representing), not for random decoration of placenames, which makes the table much harder to interpret, a bewildering array of color-blobs.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  21:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misuse of flag icons 

message: Where is this table data coming from?:
 | 2,123 ||   Ma Minh Cam || 2017
I got the impression it was coming from de.wikipedia's version of this article, but I've not checked what their sourcing is; Carambol tells me their article goes back further than ours, too.
That said, I'm also not sure where the info on Piedrabuena came from, either; I just reverted deletion of it because the deletion wasn't explained.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  21:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ma Minh Cam and Pedro Piedrabuena 

message: This article should include a list of women's world champions. Dutchy45 (talk) 01:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I just found the women"s article. Dutchy45 (talk) 02:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe we need to link to it more prominently. And is the main event open, or by its rules men-only? That might be important to clarify.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  16:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing women
Talk:Play-Asia

message: A tag has been placed on :Play-Asia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. 
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of :Play-Asia and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.   Sohail009 (talk) 10:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Play-Asia]]
Talk:William M. Branham/Archive 2

message: Most of the changes are insignificant but there are two I disagree with:
1.  There were/are many Christians(Pentecostals particularly) who believe William Branham was a prophet, even though they disagree with some of his teachings and do not regard themselves as "followers" (among these were Gordon Lindsay, T L Osborn, Kenneth Hagin).
2.  You have deleted a comment about the influence William Branham had on evangelists at that time. I will do a little research and include a comment, with references, that indicates the extent of that influence.   Rev107 01:10, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kelly A. Siebecke: edits

message: I have been attempting to add references to the article on William Branham.  It is my first foray into Wikipedia, so my apologies to those who may have been notified of numerous changes - they are all to do with providing references, as well as a few minor alterations to spelling, grammar, and style.  I have not attempted to alter the content. Rev107 01:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I tagged this article as POV because much of it simply repeats Branham's own claims uncritically. David L Rattigan 10:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: This section doesn't exactly make sense about what is being said. Some may believe that but that isn't the view shared by all Message Believers. This seriously needs a better NPOV. 67.142.130.23 19:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Followers and Main Belief 

message: I found 
 "that by 1977 all denominations would be consumed by the World Council of Churches under the control   
 of the Roman Catholics, that the rapture would take place, and that the world would be destroyed."  
 (Burgess and McGee, Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements, 96)
However this is quite a jump from what the article pages says!  It's also the only _source_ I could find.  The transcripts of (at least some of) his sermons are online, the one I found (http://www.nathan.co.za/message.asp?sermonum=1074) mentions WCC in a negative biblical context but that's about it (although I didn't read the whole thing).  
I think we need a more authoratiative reference to say that he made the statemnt, and that he claimed it was divinly inspired prophecy. 
I have removed this text until we have an authority.
**I agree, as far as I can see Branham never made such a statement as prophecy Malachi456 03:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prophecy or not. UPDATED WITH PROOF

message: http://www.bibleway.org/wmb/ is a page I found where the text appears very similar (almost verbatim) to the original article. We may have clean the article up a lot more fully One Salient Oversight 04:47, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted Material?
Talk:Moxy Früvous

message: I have removed the recently (re-)added statement " Its single, "King of Spain", was only the second Canadian independent No. 1 hit in the country's history. (Torontonians Barenaked Ladies were first by a few months, with 1991's "Be My Yoko Ono".)" for lacking any sourcing. This article has been tagged for this problem for well over a year; adding additional unsourced material is the last thing it needs. DonIago (talk) 19:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's unsourced, I completely agree with you.  However, it seems bizarre that the entire article doesn't even mention "King of Spain" anymore.  I have no idea if it hit #1, or if it was the second Canadian independent #1, but it was a huge hit for them, and should probably be mentioned in some capacity in the article. 209.90.140.72 (talk) 06:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I slipped it into the discography section, with a wikilink to the song's article.  PKT(alk) 14:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Material 

message: Moxy Früvous uploaded a series of videos from the 2003 show "Cracking the Code" to YouTube, such as this one for an episode's opening and closing sequence. Is there information on the timeline of when these songs were recorded and sequences filmed? SofiaAFigueroa (talk) 18:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cracking the Code" TV Program (2003)
Talk:JamisonParker

message: Is Jamisonparker a big band when their around?
i think no one would reply to this since it's a bit abandoned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan Zeron (talk • contribs) 20:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uhhhh hello? 
Talk:Luther Jackson Middle School

message: Luther Jackson Middle School is in the lyrics of the song "Extreme Days" and is mentioned at the very end of the song "Love is in the House" on the "Momentum" CD by tobyMac.SMCC-03 14:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: School in lyrics

message: The LJMS Orchestra recently went to the 2012 VMEA.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.133.225 (talk) 01:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  VMEA 

message: Every time I visit this article, it appears that someone has vandalized it by changing information like statistics that get past the anti-vandalism bots and admins. I believe there should be protection on this article.108.56.233.10 (talk) 00:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You can request page protection at WP:PADLOCK. Regards,  Yintan  00:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive Vandalism 

message: It would be better if we made Luther Jackson its own page again.
Yours, 
Johannon (talk)
Why? Has it suddenly gained a clear claim to notability? Jacona (talk) 01:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think...