lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jayachandra

message: Gahadavalas are not Rajputs. The identity of Rajputs did not even exist at that time. In fact, the term "Rajput" has also been used as an anachronistic designation for leading martial lineages of 11th and 12th centuries that confronted the Ghaznavid and Ghurid invaders such as the Pratiharas, the Chahamanas (of Shakambhari, Nadol and Jalor), the Tomaras, the Chaulukyas, the Paramaras, the Gahadavalas, and the Chandelas. However, the Rajputs only started existing in the 16th century, and it was only then claimed that Rajputs descended from these lineages.This is part of the wider process of Rajputization. Rajputization was when a budding low caste caste warrior or king wants to cement his social status, so he employs Brahmins or charans to fabricate genealogies leading back to a great Kshatriya dynasty of the past. In fact, historians agree that Rajputs mainly originate from Shudras and tribals.But anyways, Jayachandra was a Gahadavala, but Gahadavalas were not Rajputs, because Rajputs didn't exist at that time, and it is anachronisticlly claimed that they were Rajputs.Chariotrider555 (talk) 06:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a source.Chariotrider555 (talk) 06:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, so these sources state that Gahadavalas and etc. are Rajputs, and that Rajputs existed prior to the 16th century, correct? If that is the case, then that has huge ramifications. The Wikipedia article on Rajputs states "The term "Rajput" acquired its present meaning only in the 16th century, although it is also anachronistically used to describe the earlier lineages that emerged in northern India from the sixth century onwards.", and provides various sources later in the article. If you want to state that Rajputs existed prior to the 16th century and that the earlier lineages were indeed Rajputs, then it should be discussed there, because they came to a consensus that Rajputs date to that time and the earlier lineages are not Rajputs. It is not suitable to discuss this for a specific ruler, but should be discussed on the general Rajput talk page as there are a variety of dynasties who some historians claim to have been Rajputs prior to the 16th century, and it is not feasible to have a discussion on ever single one of those talk pages. Otherwise if you do not wish to move the discussion to the Rajput talk page, we must listen to the consensus that was previously established there that the Rajputs date to the 16th century and that the earlier lineages are not Rajputs.Chariotrider555 (talk) 06:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

text: Ok, I will take that as a consensus has been established.Chariotrider555 (talk) 07:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

text: By the way, Wikipedia considers tertiary sources like Encyclopedia Britannica to be on a lower tier of reliability than a secondary published source.Chariotrider555 (talk) 07:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gahadavalas are not Rajputs
Talk:Jalal-ud-Din Khalji

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Why was this article's name changed without any reason? Every reliable source calls him "Jalaluddin". On what basis was this page moved? I tried moving it to "Jalaluddin Khalji" but I'm not able to. Why? - Almeda64 (talk) 19:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name change

message: W28394 Please quote the references and the statements used in those sources which refer to either Pashtun origin of Khiljis or Jalal ud din Khalji ? 
All the sources used are pointing to Turkish tribe etc. 
Kami2018 (talk) 04:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References with Turko Pashtun word or even Pashtun for Khilji dynasty ?  

message: The origin of the jalaludun Khilji is debatable among turko-Afghan, and he's from Khilji Tribe not Khalaj tribe. Semijan0 (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial/Debatable Issues
Talk:Inferno (Stargate Atlantis)

message: Is there a way to change the airdate to be more generic? After all, these episodes have been originally airing in Canada first, not the US.
: I agree. I have already posted a comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stargate but no response so far. --Tone 13:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:1967 Oak Lawn tornado outbreak

message: Supposedly from what I read in the archives at the library, the tornado touched down originally on 86th Court and 103rd. Lovely to know that is my block.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.47.15.38 (talk) 15:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Palos Hills Touchdown

message: Would it make sense to replace 'Geopotential Heights' with 'Pressure' for clarity?  Most people are more familiar with High and Low pressure area terms than they are with geopotential heights.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.72.138.91 (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Less Technical Language
Talk:Gautamiputra Satakarni

message: Gautamiputra is said in this article to have reigned between 78-102 CE, but also to have been succeeded by his son in 130. Elsewhere Nahapana is mentioned to have been defeated by Gautamiputra in 125 CE. Which of this is right, or are these years all guesses? Soczyczi 07:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 102, 125, 130?

message: This article erroneously mentions Vikramaditya as a Saka ("Gautamiputra Satakarni also defeated the Saka king[citation needed] Vikramaditya"). Vikramaditya himself is credited with defeating Sakas and starting Vikram samvat to commemorate that event (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikramaditya).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.168.73.8 (talk) 23:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vikramaditya: a saka? 

message: The image showing naked women and Satakarni drinking and celebrating is vulgar.
The image is just an imagination of a 19 th century artist and it doesn't depict the original situations that existed at that time.
It may mislead the readers regarding the personality of Satakarni.
There's no evidence that women are treated like that in his kingdom.
I request your views on this. Krishna Kaasyap 19:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I support removal of the image. I don't think it's "vulgar", but it is not an accurate (or near-accurate) representation of the event it describes. utcursch | talk 20:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of image depicting Satakarni celebrating
Talk:Apocope

message: I suggest merging this article with apocopation, which seems to describe exactly the same thing.  Please discuss at Talk:Apocopation. -Pgan002 05:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "apocopation" 

message: In Latin lup[us] the um is not really lost, it is replaced by le or la. I think, theses are bad exmples. Article (grammar)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.56.156.165 (talk) 11:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical sound change 

message: There are exceptions, like "sac," "oeuf," "sel," "ir" verbs and "fils." (Words ending in c, f, l and r are often exceptions, but there are exceptions to the exceptions (e.g., "estomac," "clef," and "er" verbs).  I've changed this to "the final consonant of most words.) Kostaki mou (talk) 21:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "French pronunciation suppresses the final consonant of each word"
Talk:Tatlin's Tower

message: Why is this structure a "member"? Is this supposed to mean that Tatline's member was a tower? Dahn 06:08, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Tatlin's Tower is a perfect symbol of communism. It's ugly, ill-conceived, its heart is empty and it doesn't work.
I agree, Tatlin's Tower is a perfect symbol of communism: a vision of overcoming the everyday world (especially in Russia) of poverty, backwardness, and cruelty. But only a dream. Peshkov 23:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 00:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: By The Way

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional short explanation, then sign your opinion with (~~~~). 
*Weak oppose, per WP:NAME. Although I support using the proper name of any work of art, Google hits for Tatlin's Tower outnumber the suggested location almost 10 to 1. On Wikipedia, "Arrangement in Grey and Black: The Artist's Mother" is located at Whistler's Mother, as it is the most common name. Particularly since this tower was never actually constructed, I side with the public nickname. Kafziel 19:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Searches on Google Books are often preferred, as these show usage by experts.  Here, the official name outweighs the nickname about six to one. Warofdreams talk 00:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The Eiffel Tower was officially called the "300 meter tower", but that was a stupid name, because there were many of those at the time, so everybody (including wikipedia) started calling it by its architect. The Colosseum was officially called the "Flavian Amphitheatre", but the people started calling it the colosseum as a reference to a colossal statue that ued to be next to the building. The official name should of course still be bold in the articles opening sentence. GMRE (talk) 18:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: I'd also oppose the renaming

message: There is one additional model, not mentioned in the article, at the Ho Chi Minh Museum in Hanoi.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.147.244.77 (talk) 11:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model in Hanoi 
Talk:New Castle, Delaware

message: The first external link (Virtual Tour) does exist but is now non functional due to changes in microsoft map technology.  A much more useful like would be
http://nc-chap.org (New Castle History and Archaeology Program) which has a huge amount of information and receives many thousands of hits monthly (according to google). 96.95.147.154 (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Spintendo  00:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead web page in external links
Talk:Sky Angel

message: This reads like an advertisment.  
This article is ridden with NPOV and advertising problems. I'm gonna clean it up.Colby Peterson 16:06, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Call sky angel fo service 98.183.248.182 (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV and Advertising 

message: Sky Angel sold "lifetime subscriptions" to people in their early years only to change the way they provide service to their consumers and effectively ripping off those "lifetime" subscribers.  The response from Sky Angel has been nonchalant and indifferent.  I would suggest you stay away from this company, they rate right up there with Jimmy Bakker and his PTL Club. 
How come this page no longer references the satellite service of SkyAngel?
:I noticed that too. I will try to correct that ASAP. --King of the Clowns (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satellite Service? 

message: I have been trying to subscribe to Sky Angel service for over a month.  I have called them back and sent two e-mails.  The last one was not answered. I heard a rumor that they were going out of business.  Is this true?  They don't seem to be interested in new customers.
207.118.209.25 (talk) 23:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subscription Problems 

message: Sky Angel is a Japanese adult video series from producer/publisher Sky High Entertainment.  There's a Chinese WP page for the company, but no English language page: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_High_Entertainment%E4%BD%9C%E5%93%81%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8
Sky Angel is also the name of a licensed brothel in Brisbane, Australia: http://skyangel.com.au/
I wasn't aware of the US TV network until today.  I believe this page should be renamed, and a disambiguation page should be created.
2001:44B8:3146:7600:C4B:1DBE:BA9B:37FB (talk) 07:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed?
Talk:List of railroad crossings of the North American continental divide

message: Would the Continental Divide, New Mexico be Raton Pass on the AT&SF?
Lazarus-long 06:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Raton is the highest point (7573')on the line between Chicago and Los Angeles, but that is not the Continental Divide. The Continental Divide is about drainage and not elevation. The Divide is the line between the Pacific watershed and the Atlantic (and Gulf of Mexico)watershed. Raton is east of the Rio Grande, which flows into the Gulf.  
I have a better version of this page at-
http://www.trains.com/TRC/CS/forums/745346/ShowPost.aspx
Dale
nanaimo73@shaw.ca
70.66.88.231 15:51, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nasdijj

message: Tim Barrus constantly and frequently comments on blogs in the NY Times.  If you are going to print links to ANY of them, then fairness requires that links be provided to ALL of them, not just the more exciting ones.
Also, it appears that Lars Eighner has NO connection to Tim Barrus whatsoever except that 1) his manuscripts were turned down by gay publications edited by Barrus in San Francisco years ago and 2) he has been pushing negative information about Barrus from the first moment that Barrus began receiving prizes and so on.  Also, it appears that he is at least one of the cyberstalkers who plague Cinematheque with obscene threats against the boys.   I think this is enough to justify the removal of his name, which I'm sure he hopes will link to his own website.  If you want to see what Lars is like, check that website.
Mary Scriver216.129.234.160 (talk) 17:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Eighner reference has been removed.  The NYT reference is to an article that discusses Barrus, not to comments made by him. Vizjim (talk) 08:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Taking into account concerns regarding his writing not being fairly represented, I've found an enthusiastic review from Studies in American Indian Literatures.  Do you know of any literary journal that has a review of his non-Nasdijj work accessible online? Vizjim (talk) 08:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Barrus comments 

message: I'm unsure from the above what material you would want added to the article - could you perhaps give details? Vizjim (talk) 16:01, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MATERIAL I SENT IN ANSWER TO THIS REQUEST? 

message: In Barrus' novels he claims that he's served in the military and was in the Vietnam war when he apparently was never in the military or the Vietnam war at all.
http://larseighner.com/homeblog/index.php/2006/01/nasdijj-is-tim-barrus/#more-85  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.238.240.242 (talk) 06:44, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military Fraud in novels 

message: Given that Nasdijj and his creator aren't exactly well-liked, I've removed the name of family members from this page.  Unlike Barrus, they have not had a part in the Nasdijj affair and don't deserve to be permanently associated with it.  This fits the spirit of WP:BLP, I believ. Vizjim (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family members
Talk:Chronology protection conjecture

message: There should be linking between this physics article and the comic book article on the Time Variance Authority, which is essentionally the same concept, first appearing in 1986. Kevingarcia 06:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate the links to pop culture, but I couldn't help but think of a parallel with some of the more unusual hypotheses of John C. Lilly.73.154.61.4 (talk) 23:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: physics, comics

message: Robert Tseglin proposed a Chronology Protection Law derived from the results of the double slit experiment, in a book published on September 21st 2020 titled " Treatise on the Proposed Chronology Protection Law Derived from Quantum Mechanics." Rtseglin (talk) 06:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Chronology Protection Law 

message: The implications address not only time-like curves and analysis of the barriers to backwards time travel, and other connections in physics, particularly between various quantum phenomena, and between quantum mechanics and relativity, but through such analyses even proposes similarities and connections that could be explored mathematically to endeavor to arrive at a unified theory. 2A02:6680:113A:E882:C5:2A4B:FF43:86D5 (talk) 20:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Publication of Robert Tseglin of a Treatise on the Proposed Chronology Protection Law Derived from Quantum Mechanics 

message: before I destroyed my headset 2600:1014:A007:AA43:2190:9038:6066:24DF (talk) 04:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  show me to show my headset
Talk:Kangaroo Point Cliffs

message: The first hyperlinked article to popular rock climbing site TheCrag.Com indicates:
'Kangaroo Point', affectionately known to locals as 'KP', is Brisbane's outdoor climbing gym. It is one of the most user-friendly crags around, with gigantic concrete bollards at the top of the 20m high cliff face for setting up anchors.
The info box indicates 18 metres, it would seem appropriate to obtain an officially attributable height?
DNSLOC (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual height source unattributed 

message: is there any actual reference that can back this statement up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patsimon (talk • contribs) 05:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  since when is Climbing the rocks without adequate ropes is punishable by law?
Talk:Time Variance Authority

message: There should be linking between this comic book article and the physics article on the Chronology Protection Agency, which is essentionally the same concept, first suggested in 1992 (several years after the TVA appeared). Kevingarcia 06:42, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Estonian Provincial Assembly

message: Diet of Estonian and Livonian chivalry was also called maapäev in contemporary Estonian.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.235.57.178 (talk • contribs) 26 January 2006 (UTC)
:"diet" is not right word, but yes maapäev is ambigious. See eg :et:Maapäev--Estopedist1 (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That is a stubby page!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.162.50.93 (talk • contribs) 10 April 2007 (UTC)
:old info, belongs to Start-class--Estopedist1 (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: headwords Estonian National Council, National Council (Estonia) are redirected here, but we have also Riiginõukogu ('National Council') and related wrong link at National_Council#Legislative_bodies--Estopedist1 (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity in National Council 

message: no point to keep this mini-list which hasn't potential to grow Estopedist1 (talk) 06:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A more specific action would be to merge List of Chairmen of the Estonian Provincial Assembly to List of members of the Estonian Provincial Assembly#Chairman. Klbrain (talk) 17:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected to that alternative target, given that the duplication. Klbrain (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of Chairmen of the Estonian Provincial Assembly]] into [[Estonian Provincial Assembly]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Vpab15 (talk) 17:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 1917 Estonian Provincial Assembly election →  – the body vs this body's elections. Compare interwikis Estopedist1 (talk) 07:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 February 2021
Talk:Monroe, Wisconsin (disambiguation)

message: It seems to me to be clearly an incomplete dab - whether it's a case for IAR is debatable, I guess. I have tagged it, but haven't nominated a solution, just tagged it for discussion/looking at solutions/consensus. This was previously merged, unopposed, to Monroe#Places, but I don't think anyone than me offerend an opinion one way or another. A separate Wisconsin section in the Monroe dab, with this title redirecting to Monroe#Wisconsin might be one idea. I dislike incomplete dabs because of the confusion such duplication causes, but what do people think? Boleyn (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, looks fine to me. Three articles all capable of being "naturally" titled "Monroe, Wisconsin", good use of a dab page. -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Similar to discussion at Oak Hill, Virginia. Station1 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INCOMPDAB]]
Talk:Serfoji II

message: Could anyone provide some photos?? If possible do provide a larger photo of raja serfoji II.Regards. - Ravichandar84 12:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:International DN

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support.  Why does this even need a vote? -- RoySmith (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does it require an admin?  I'm an admin, and I'd be happy to do the move, but as far as I can tell, there's nothing that any non-admin user couldn't do just as easily.  -- RoySmith (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While DN → International DN could be moved by any user, the proposed move is a double move, with DN (disambiguation) → DN. I am fairly certain this second move would require an admin. Of course, if you feel there is no need to vote, please do go ahead and move both! --Lox (t,c) 18:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That about sums it up.  I was going to do the first move myself but then realized that I could not do everything.  I thought it was better to do it all at once.  Hence the vote which I believe is requried when you list in 'requested moves'.  Vegaswikian 20:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see.  OK, all moved now.  It is an honor to have used my broom in such a worthy cause.  -- RoySmith (talk) 20:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers Sir! --Lox (t,c) 20:22, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: I don't see anything in International Detroit News Ice Yacht Racing Association (other than some external links) which isn't already duplicated in International DN.  It seems logical to just merge them (and leave a redirect behind).  The articles about the J/24, Sonar, Soling, and Star (i.e. all the classes I checked) all just have external links to the respective class associations right in the article about the boat itself; I don't see any reason the DN should be any different. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[International Detroit News Ice Yacht Racing Association]] into into [[International DN]]
Talk:Velen Fanderlik

message: I've warned you nicely on your talkpage. You cannot simply dump text you find at another website here. I have the material by Wilson, it does not say enough about Fanderlik to warrant inclusion. Your repeated reinsertion of the barely-notable Lloyd Bryan Adams is a vanity edit and shows whose sockpuppet you are. Stop now. Your inclusions will continue to be reverted. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 02:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP sockpuppet