lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nowheh

message: Noha is an Arabic name. Often used for arabic girls.It is a word used in the Quran, which means the mind.
Is Noha only in Arabic/Persian/Urdu? One of the links now shows English as a medium of Noha? Should this be reflected in the article? -00:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

message: While using the Latin script they might appear the same, in Arabic however there are two entirely different words with different meanings:
*, transliterated Nuha: a name meaning "intelligence"/"the intellectual", e.g. Noha Abd Rabo
*, transliterated Nūḥah and often rendered Noha: a music genre, e.g. the Farsi wikipedia article.
I'm planning on providing hatnotes and rewriting the lead here to de-clutter the unrelated versions of this word. - HyperGaruda (talk) 21:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion in transliteration 

message: It seems that Nohe (from Iranian culture) and this page Noha are two different things. Every Iranian living in and outside Iran and knows what Nohe is,  and what is write in this article is not that. I get that it is hard to find sources that explains Nohe but allowing Nohe and Noha to be merged or be the same is not accurate.
I think it would be better to separate the two from each other and allow the cultural Iranian Nohe to be explained by Iranians with Iranian sources and Noha to exist as it is.
one way of doing this is to translate the Farsi page directly and allowing those sources to be foundation for the content of the page Nohe. 06:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nohe and Noha is not the same as it is now and how the article has evolved.
Talk:Rock Creek and Potomac Parkway

message: Exactly where does the reversible setup begin? "Ohio Drive" is somewhat unclear. Where is northbound traffic required to exit during morning rush hour? --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 10:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: At the point where Ohio Drive (or whatever it's called at that point) splits into the Rock Creek and Potomac Parkway and the Potomac River Freeway, a barrier is set up at the entrance to the Parkway during morning rush hour.  Northbound traffic does not enter the Parkway at all, but instead is required to use the Potomac River Freeway.  For instance, instead of taking the Parkway straight to the Kennedy Center parking garage, you take the Potomac River Freeway to Virginia Avenue to 25th Street.  Doctor Whom 13:48, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha - that makes sense. Is the ramp from the circle around the Lincoln Memorial similarly closed then, or are you just forced to turn right at Ohio Drive? --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 19:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The ramp from the circle is open; you just have to bear right instead of left. Doctor Whom 16:00, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an important exception to the rules about lanes reversing at certain times on weekdays... if the weekday is a (Federal) holiday then the lanes do not reverse.  This is particularly important on minor Federal holidays, when many people work and do not perceive the day as being a big holiday. For six months, I was in the habit of taking RCP northbound from the Lincoln Memorial after work Mondays. One day I turned left into my usual RCP lane and found myself facing on-coming traffic. It was Columbus Day.JDKempenaar 20:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Caveat about rush hour lanes

message: Surely that photograph is looking north from the M Street bridge, not the Pennsylvania Avenue bridge. No? If it were from the Pennsylvania Avenue bridge you'd see the M Street bridge.Thehersch 22:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo looking north

message: why doesn't this article have a map? it'd be a very nice addition. 71.178.135.144 (talk) 04:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: map

message: Bfpage |leave a message  15:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK congratulations
Talk:Badr, Saudi Arabia

message: I think "Badr Hunayn" may be a compound name, like Budapest, and actually refer to two seperate cities that just happen to be near each other. Palm_Dogg 19:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes that can be true. The map I looked at showed both Badr and Badr Hunayn at the same spot. But Badr Hunayn isn't a name that is used normally. --a.n.o.n.y.m   t 21:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-02-06/News and notes

message: I make the number of people with CheckUser rights to be 10.
When did this change from the 9 quoted here?
Who is the extra person?
HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 10:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure you gave the right link? :-) Anyways, yes, I'm definitely sure that at the time I wrote the article, there were only 9 check users. If my memory serves me, developer Brion Vibber is the one just added. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Wolfgang Sawallisch

message: The German article says that in 1953 he was the youngest person to conduct the Aachen orchestra, not the Berlin Philharmonic. Which version is right? --Missmarple 10:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which orchestra?
Talk:Major George Johnston

message: Documents published by Bankstown City Council give the name "Captain George Johnson" - instead of "Major George Johnston" (note the Captain/Major and Johnson and Johnston difference).  I am inclined to believe that "Johnston" is the correct name because other documents published by the council give the name "George Johnston Jr.", which is most probably one of his sons. Newhoggy | Talk 10:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Vaccine debate

message: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5243a4.htm
Was there a-v activity or success there?  Midgley 11:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italy 

message: Perhaps this article should be merged back with anti-vaccinationists.  Andrew73 14:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is certainly part of the same thing.  Is a-v short enough to take it? Midgley 20:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the anti-vaccinationists article can handle incorporating the material into the article.  At least this way, there will be a central area for discussing the vaccine "controversy."  And avoid the whole issue with "forking."  Andrew73 21:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I've no objection.  It was created as a sub-page, but not really a temporary one, rather a single chapter, which I see is not a WP policy.  Someone else can move it.  Midgley 22:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged back with anti-vaccinationists? 

message: harm comes as part of increases in infection, some increases in some infections have followed some reductions in some vaccines some of which have been partly as a public response to information some of which has been presented with care and effort by some people who some people regard as conveniently labelled by "anti-vacinationists".  Midgley 19:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not NPOV unless you want to put a page to "alleged harm done by vaccines". john 20:36, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a page whose title indicated it was good claimed to have come of a-v's successes.  In the same minute as I created that one, if I recall correctly.  I had thought it might get some content.  I think that those two are the opposites apposite to this page, the other one is something else, and doesn't bear on what a-vs have done and achieved.  Midgley 01:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I hope not, the intention was to split the excessively long and argumentative page anti-vaccinationists into sections on some of which it would be easy to achieve NPOV.  My remark above may have been insufficiently clear - is this NPOV applies not to the page, but to the single statement immediately  following the question.  That was taken from the talk page of anti-vaccinationists.  It can all be merged back in, but it would be nice if it was possible to agree some NPOV text on what is said to be both bad and due to teh success of anti-vaccinationist argument.     A corresponding page or section on things that have happened which are agreed or asserted to be good, and which are agreed or asserted to have come from a-v sucesses exists, or if it has gone away perhaps should again exist.  I'm assuming there are hany people who will assert it has content... Midgley 20:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this single statement immediatly below NPOV?
Talk:Net (magazine)

message: Removed comment about Drew writing the back page as he no longer contributes to .net.
I have a copy here of cre@te online dated July, 2000 and marked as "issue 001, launch issue" can someone reconcile this with a 1994 start date. Also the article text is at odds if cre@te online ceased, merged with the existing .Net magazine, or  changed its name. Erikdhanson (talk) 03:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:BIOS-3

message: There is a fuller reference in this article - I can't find a current online link to it <P>
Bios-3: Siberian Experiments in Bioregenerative Life Support 
Frank B. Salisbury, Josef I. Gitelson, Genry M. Lisovsky
BioScience, Vol. 47, No. 9 (Oct., 1997) , pp. 575-585
<P>The facility used 400 kw per day? week? hour?
:I can't find the 400 kW figure in the references. However, I take this as average continuous power usage, which is pretty significant, but adds up. The 20 6kW lamps take 120kW power, maybe another times that much for cooling the lamps, representing over half of the energy usage. Add in the thermocatalytic filter and other miscellaneous power requirements, and it's a believable figure.
:As such, it would be 400kW * 24h = 9.6 MWh per day, 67.2 MWh per week, 288 MWh per month. At local energy rates of $0.06/kWh, that's a staggering $17,280 per month. The cost of living is steep. Ayecee (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the "-3" is original, the risk of confusion with the "-2" in "Biosphere-2"
is large, and an explanation should be explictly given.
If, OTOH, the number is a later addition that does play on "Biosphere-2",
the original name should be mentioned. Further, it would likely be best to
rename the entire article to match.
88.77.149.250 (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "-3"? 
Talk:Professors for a Strong Israel

message: PSI is clearly a far-right organisation.
You can read on their own website that they are at the right of Sharon and Likud.
http://www.professors.org.il/
Just do not stop at the front page, where they define themselves as a "non-partisan organization of academics united by a shared concern for the security and the Jewish character of the State of Israel", which had been directly copy-pasted to Wikipedia.
Read on the "PSI statements" section and you will see that they have tried to lobby Sharon's governement (which belongs to the right-wing party) to disengage the settlements from Gaza. They say that Sharon's decision is "ethnic cleansing".
http://www.professors.org.il/releases/08aug05.htm
They also totally oppose the creation of a palestinian state :
http://www.professors.org.il/releases/14feb03.htm
They strongly oppose Sharon's governement.
82.230.102.65 21:55, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: is a relevant aspect of any political group, and is attributed. If there are other sources that give a different description any person is free to add them. nableezy - 07:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: especially when theres a self-described orientation already listed. nableezy - 07:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  where they are on the ideological spectrum 
Talk:Barry Jantz

message: It seems this is a politician's autobiography. Any ideas about notability? jni 10:38, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: City councilman of regionally notable city and Republican political operative counts. Calwatch 05:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 
Talk:Rachid Ben Ali

message: Version of 10:30, 8 February 2006:
*elpais.es ¿Pueden convivir en paz el islam y Occidente?
*http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/02/07/news/europe.php
*http://hirsialiayaan.web-log.nl/archief/05/2005
*http://www.cultureclock.com/calendar/item6115.html
*http://www.marokkonederland2005.nl/project.nl.php?id=134
*http://www.culturekiosque.com/art/exhibiti/rachid_ben_ali.html
*http://gayinfo.tripod.com/A-Z-B.html
Quote as cited in the El País article of 20th February, 2005:
:"Quiero que la gente vea que siendo de origen musulmán, como yo, uno puede ser absolutamente libre en su forma de pensar. El mundo musulmán no te da espacio como individuo. Hay un control social terrible. Y para poder transmitir este mensaje y conseguir que la gente hable, lo que hay que hacer es romper tabúes". 
"I want people to see that you can, being of muslim origin, like me, be completely free in your way of thinking. The muslim world doesn't give you room as individual. There is awful social control. In order to get this message across and to make people talk, what you have to do is to break taboos"
Translated by --tickle me 10:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Rachid Ben Ali has been painting for a long time. In the second half of the nineties he made work under the name Daniel Satink.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.24.200.105 (talk) 17:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early work 
Talk:Ford Mustang SSP

message: Not bad for a start. If you can contribute more, or just polish it up to make it look better, then by all means, be bold!!--293.xx.xxx.xx 12:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the Originator 

message: This one was while coming. Did not belong on the main mustang page. Well done on this page. CJ DUB 03:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super page 

message: This article will be put on hold (for 7 days) until these minor adjustments can be made :
:1. Well written? Fail
:2. Factually accurate? Fail
:3. Broad in coverage? Fail
:4. Neutral point of view? Fail
:5. Article stability? Pass
:6. Images? Pass
Additional comments :
* Article is too listy, almost all of it should be turned into prose. (See article Lancia Flaminia for an example)
* Having one or more citations for that : Nearly 15,000 of these special units were made from 1982 until their discontinuation in 1993 to over 60 law enforcement organizations and government agencies. Their roles ranged from general patrol to pursuit units, with some used in special duties like drug interdiction to academy training units. Several units were specially tasked to help land the Lockheed U2 Spyplane. would help the reader.
* If the lists present in Usage section can't be turned into prose, at least place the section after the other sections.
* Restoring Mustang SSPs have become a growing hobby as of late, with car clubs and websites devoted to the restoration of the law enforcement workhorse. happened when for as of late can't be used in a time-independent encyclopedia.
* All the paragraph starting with Restoring Mustang SSPs ... is not encyclopedic.
* Not enough citations for Distinct models.
* SSP in popular culture is uncyclopedic unless fully expanded and made a good section out of it.
Lincher 12:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA on hold

message: Comments haven't been voiced pertaining to the recent nomination which wasn't up to the GA standards. The article did not reach GA status but if modifications are done, the article can be resubmitted to the good articles candidates. Good luck, Lincher 19:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA failed
Talk:Hadi al-Modarresi

message: Please refrain from vandalizing this page as it goes against the ethos of wikipedia. All comments should be added to the page under specific subjects. There seems to be an attempt by certain rogue individuals to continually vandalize this topic through a hopeless smearing campaign. Those involved are advised to stop their childish acts which do no service to the Wikipedia brand. 
Thank you. 
82.194.62.22 11:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism of Talk:Hadi al-Modarresi  

message: I found it very interesting that this article completely skipped over Almodarresi's involvement in the Islamic Front for the Liberation of Bahrain. So today I'm attempting to flesh out that time period, since it seems pretty significant. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:29, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, it was added in March 2006 and removed as "vandalism"... funny how that happens. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article said nothing about the failed 1981 coup in Bahrain? 

message: I restored this section, as it seems quite strongly referenced and it was quite easy to find additional references supporting this. Other sections in the article do need referencing. I did not restore the "exile in Iran" section as it was not referenced and I couldn't verify all the details (though verifying he was in exile in Iran is verifiable - the book authorship and assassination attempts less so).Icewhiz (talk) 06:55, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please discuss the issue here. Edit warring is never endorsed. INeedSupport(Care free to give me support?) 14:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bahraini coup d'état 

message: Some editors are deliberately or ignorantly echoing Bahrain regime propaganda which attempts to smear the subject of the article. I have since tried to provide some balance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jetson401 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bahrain regime smearing campaign
Talk:Reform Acts

message: I have placed the entry for Reform Act 1886 in italics. I do not believe any such Act existed (as I explain in Talk:Reform Act 1886). Unless someone can explain to me what precise statute is being referred to I think the entry should be deleted. --Gary J 10:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: The info box should not sit in the middle. It should be in upper right hand corner. - Pernambuco 05:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box 

message: These two pages discuss the same acts, in a manner which overlaps. I'm not sure which is preferable as the title of the merged article, but there's not much benefit to the duplication, with all the Wikipedia:Content forking concerns. – Iveagh Gardens (talk) 14:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Representation of the People Act]]
Talk:10th Princess Mary's Own Gurkha Rifles

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.  Added WWI and WWII Task forces    --dashiellx (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The sketch of the cap badge is a bit on the dark side - I don't remember 10 GR's insignia being so dingy, does anyone have the expertise to brighten it up a bit? RASAM (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The cap badge
Talk:102nd Regiment of Foot (Royal Madras Fusiliers)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 13:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I have preformed a minor edit which corrects most linking and grammer errors.
(Generalhannible (talk) 22:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor edit 
Talk:104th Regiment Royal Artillery

message: that is not updated. Typhoon2885 (talk) 09:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the tense in one place. I am not sure in what other respect it is out of date. Dormskirk (talk) 10:20, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another article 

message: https://twitter.com/XIX_CO/status/809519600538972160
to a light gun battery.
ACSilver (talk) 08:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  update 
Talk:106th (Yeomanry) Regiment Royal Artillery

message: https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2017-03-21/68813/
BlueD954 (talk) 06:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future role uncertain 

message: This article was moved without discussion. I have reverted the change. Please see Talk:101st (Northumbrian) Regiment Royal Artillery#Undiscussed article move which is relevant. Dormskirk (talk) 22:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have again had to revert an undiscussed move. This is the right place to obtain consensus. Dormskirk (talk) 23:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed article move
Talk:10th (North Lincoln) Regiment of Foot

message: The image was added to this article by Marc29th. On the image page the image is listed as, "the copyright holder allows the image to be freely redistributed, modified, used commercially and for any other purpose, provided that their authorship is attributed." This is not a fair-use tag. It is very appropriate for the article in the fact that these soldiers are in 10th Regiment uniforms. Any reason to remove this photograph as it is being removed by User:Calton for instance is not for the good of Wikipedia. Removing photo is akin to vandalism since it does nothing but enhance the article. Dwain 02:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right: removing it does enhance the article. I'm glad we agree. --Calton | Talk 08:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh, and guy, it's a screen capture, meaning it's a fair-use image, no matter how much hand-waving you do. --Calton | Talk 08:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Napoleonic task force added    --dashiellx (talk) 16:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Antenna diversity

message: "For best results, the antennas are usually placed one wavelength apart. Because of the sheer size of antenna farms required, this is not often used at frequencies lower than the microwave band." - It's not clear whether the "this" in "this is not used" is referring to Antenna Diversity, or to spacing the antennas one wavelength apart.
: Fixed.  Thank you! --Mdwyer 03:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I don't think this belongs on the main article, but I want to put it down somewhere.
It is important to note that the receiver only listens to one antenna at a time.  It is a common mistake to attach an external antenna to a WiFi router and see no benefits, because the router chooses to use the internal antenna and ignore the  external antenna. --Mdwyer 03:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misuse of Antenna Diversity 

message: It should be pointed out that there is spacial diversity (i.e. separation of the antennas) as well as pattern diversity (i.e. different radiation pattern characteristics).  The mutual coupling of the antennas will impact the amount of diversity gain which can be achieved.  The separation necessary to achieve significant diversity gain depends on both the wavelength as well as the radiation pattern characteristics. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sweden one (talk • contribs) 19:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of diversity 
Talk:1st Regiment of Life Guards

message: There is a redirect from "cheesemongers" to this article. Am I the only person who might be wondering what the connection is twixt the peddlers of the "fromage de la belle France" and this august and time-honoured military institution? Myles325a (talk) 02:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. The answer may be found in the article on the Horse Grenadier Guards. In all fairness, the various articles on the Life Guards and its antecedents are a dog's dinner that need to be reorganized and probably consolidated. Wally Wiglet (talk) 04:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  why cheesemongers? 