Talk:Medical research/Archive 1

message: The biomedical research and this page appear closely inter-related: so much so that it is tempting to consider a merger. The second paragraph of the biomedical research page, at least, seems suitable for presentation on this article. That would bring in the animal research article into the text, and human experimentation could be readily inserted. — RJH (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It might look this way because non-biomedical  research is -at present- poorly covered in this article. What about all the research into new dental fillings, artificial joints, plastic testicles, hearing aids, stints, splints, sutures, robot aided surgery, keyhole surgery, hypothermic surgery, and the list goes on and on and on.  Feel free to reading though a few trade magazines and expand the article. If it starts getting too big, that would be the time to split into separate sub categories.--Aspro 18:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biomedical research? 

message: Seems to me that clinical research could be merged into this article as an expansion of the clinical trials sections. —G716 <T·C> 21:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: The biomedical research and this page appear closely inter-related: so much so that it is tempting to consider a merger. The second paragraph of the biomedical research page, at least, seems suitable for presentation on this article. That would bring in the animal research article into the text, and human experimentation could be readily inserted. — RJH (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It might look this way because non-biomedical  research is -at present- poorly covered in this article. What about all the research into new dental fillings, artificial joints, plastic testicles, hearing aids, stints, splints, sutures, robot aided surgery, keyhole surgery, hypothermic surgery, and the list goes on and on and on.  Feel free to reading though a few trade magazines and expand the article. If it starts getting too big, that would be the time to split into separate sub categories.--Aspro 18:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biomedical research? 

message: Move Parsecboy (talk) 10:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: "Preclinical research is research in basic science, which precedes the clinical trials, and is almost purely based on theory and animal experiments."
Isn't some sort of citation needed for this ? 
--InnocentsAbroad2 (talk) 23:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theory and animal experiments 

message: The source cited in the section also contains recommendations for improvement/ mitigation/ amelioration of the flaws and vulnerabilities. I ran out of the time I budgeted for myself to edit Wikipedia today. It would be helpful if a member of the community would like to incorporate some of the suggested recommendations into the article to help further improve the article. Thanks and regards, IjonTichy  (talk) 22:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flaws and vulnerabilities 

message: I could not find anything on priority setting in medical research nor on coordination/cooperation/competition in medical research. Priority-setting in global health deals only with global health, very little on health research and says nothing on medical research. There is no article Health research, but a redirection to Public health which mentions, but does not deal with, research. For example, Wikipedia does not tell me whether patients should be involved in priority-setting in medical (or only clinical) research, and, if yes, how. Or whether patients are involved ; if yes, how, and, if no, why. As regards coordination, cooperation & competition; I can only extrapolate from the (messy) information given in Priority-setting in global health. Touchatou (talk) 10:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Priority setting, coordination, cooperation and competition

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Medical research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141228233554/http://www.mttlr.org/volfourteen/katz.pdf to http://www.mttlr.org/volfourteen/katz.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: This article could really use a discussion on the replication crisis. II | (t - c) 02:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replication crisis 

message: The first rule of fiction is that all villains think of themselves as acting according to moral principles. 
In all cases, research ethics are expected.
The first rule of fiction renders that statement tautological. 
No, what you mean here is a particular set of ratified, consensus ethics that fits comfortably inside the Overton window. — MaxEnt 04:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tautology 

message: It says in the beginning to eat this one fruit that may be in your kitchen and it doesn’t show what fruit it is. Only pills!! 😠 this is false advertisement!! Isn’t this wrong?? 2600:6C56:4100:E103:C9ED:2862:99C8:9921 (talk) 13:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glucose freeze