lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bijeypur

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Bijuri

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Bilaua

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Bilpura, Madhya Pradesh

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: Manufacturing & Packing acking Work PATRIC DAS (talk) 04:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  J D INDUSTRIES
Talk:Bina-Etawa

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Bina Railway Colony

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Kit lens

message: the statement: "most kit zooms are deliberately limited in abilities" implies some rather dastardly ulterior motives when the real reason is simply pricing and convenience. 
All lenses, whether kit, low end or extremely high end are "deliberately limited" as no one single lens can accomodate ALL optical aspects and features.
Kit lenses are intended to give the buyer a means to start using the camera immediately, without pricing the camera out of range of the competition. Nothing sinister or devious need be inferred.
KLWhitehead (talk) 15:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:François al-Hajj

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7139809.stm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 19:38, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The reference is broken and I couldn't find any other source for that claim. Add back only if you have a credible source TFighterPilot (talk) 12:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed the "Previous assassination attempt" section 
Talk:Final good

message: Industrial products are final goods, but they are not consumer goods. 108.68.168.87 (talk) 23:19, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industrial products 

message: I am not an expert on economics, but it looks like "consumer goods" is by far the prevalent term in published literature.  See this chart on Google Ngram Viewer.  WP policy is to use the common name. --Coolcaesar (talk) 16:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be moved to consumer goods 

message: Consumer good 41.182.217.131 (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accounting
Talk:List of motorways and expressways in New Zealand

message: Should the Hutt Road in wellington be counted as an expressway? It's SH2 and is a high speed median divided multi lane road with traffic lights and some uncontrolled intersections. Right now 3 sets of traffic lights are currently being replaced with an interchange and/or bridges. Surely if something like the Bell Block bypass can be called an expressway the hutt road can be too.
118.90.93.250 (talk) 15:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add it. And by the way, it's two roads, Western Hutt Road and Hutt Road. Laydan Mortensen (talk) 23:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Shields should be used because they look better and communicate information better. Similar articles use them e.g. List of road routes in Queensland
Life200BC (talk) 10:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shields
Talk:Real-time strategy/Archive 2

message: This article presents the reader with a fairly narrow definition of what an RTS is. Sure, it's the most commonly agreed upon one, but there are others. Basically, this article only includes games descended from Dune II--e.g., games that use the "harvest, build, conquer" model (to quote Bruce Geryk). However, this definition doesn't take into account games like Europa Universalis that don't have a stylized production economy as well as any tactical combat. The real-time tactics article focuses more on the differences between "strategy" and "tactics" when defining the genres. Games with things like diplomacy and logistics are "strategy" games, and games with unit vs. unit combat are "tactics" games. Games, such as X-COM, can fit into both a "strategy" and a "tactics" category. By this definition, what people commonly call "real-time strategy" would be better called "stylized real-time strategy/tactics hybrids". AFAIK this might be original research; but if sources can be found, I believe some mention of this should be made. SharkD 03:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  Something like SimCity would strictly be real-time strategy, if you parse the term word-by-word:  it is in real-time and it is strategic.  It doesn't fit, though:  it's in the genre of empire-building games.  The "known" or "used" definition of RTS is limited to such as you say:  games where combat-based war plays an important role.  (The original Civilization, if it was real-time, would be RTS; SimCity, although it is real-time and strategic, is not.)  Jav43 16:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a source which discusses the issue in part. SharkD 02:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworded the introductory section. Hopefully, it explains the situation better. The introductory section also now uses less strong language when discussing exceptions to the popular definition. SharkD 16:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The narrow definition also doesn't account for games like X-COM and Jagged Alliance 2. These games have a real-time strategy component as well as a [edit: separate] turn-based tactical component. SharkD 06:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Narrow definition of the genre

message: This article lists Legionnaire (computer game) as an RTS when, according to its description, it would be more accurately described as an early example of RTT (real-time tactics). SharkD 19:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Game is listed in wrong genre

message: The turn-based strategy article has a short section on turn-based vs. real-time gameplay. Maybe that section should be mentioned in this article? SharkD 02:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I copied the the text to the Gameplay section. I wrote the TBvsRT stuff myself, so it's OK (by me) to simply copy it. SharkD 16:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Turn-based vs. real-time
Talk:African Americans in the Revolutionary War

message: Slaves were at first not allowed to enlist because the patriots thought they would use the weapons to revolt against the owners and slavery. Later in the war when the patriots were desperate for more soldiers they decided that slaves were there ONLY choice!! Lucky for the Patriots the ones that enlisted felt as strongly about breaking away as the Patriots did and when they were armed the immediately started to fight! The African Americans did so well... some of them lasted until the battle at Yorktown, the final battle of the Revolutionary war!! The Patriots were glad that they decided to enlist the slaves. Although all of the slaves didn't get freed after the war, a lot of them did! It was a great start to the end of slavery!!!
This paragraph contains real facts... belive it!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.18.144.38 (talk) 22:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slaves enlisting in the war 

message: I am almost positive that this is false. I ave never seen any source other than Wikipedia say that more Slaves fought for the Patriots than for Britain. In fact, I have seen many sources say the opposite. This article states that as many as 9000 former slaves fought for the American military in some form. The Book The Scorpion's Sting (James Oakes, a very credible historian) says that were were as many as 20,000 who fought for the British. 
2A01:E35:2E06:77B0:D09C:62D4:9D52:E3B0 (talk) 09:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Patriot Slaves? 

message: — Assignment last updated by HughCQuinlan (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST 2010 Early U.S. History

message: Why did black people join the British against the Pedi 154.65.116.150 (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did black people join the British against the Pedi
Talk:Birsinghpur

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: about the powr plant  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.236.160 (talk) 15:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  power plant
Talk:(24)7.ai

message: There are two pages with the same text: 24/7 Customer and  24 7 inc. I suggest the pages merge. The company is called 24/7 Customer.
Reference
Geraldshields11 (talk) 16:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes on the merge. See my comment on the Talk:24 7 inc page, however: that name appears to be neither the official company name, nor the "doing business as" name which is [24]7 without the space but square brackets, and no "inc". So will merge here. W Nowicki (talk) 16:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge two pages
Talk:Burhar

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: K.p Singh former governor of Gujarat Sushant4195 (talk) 05:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people of burhar
Category talk:High fashion brands

message: My apologies for commenting here, since I am more used to dealing with categories where the subject of the category is trying to get their article out of the category, not trying to stay in it. Plus, I know nothing about fashion.
The article Belen Echandia was recently removed from this category, by User:Unixtastic. That user has displayed a long term interest in Belen Echandia, in particular there was this very curious conversation which they chose to delete from their talk page on the same day that they decided to remove Belen Echandia from this category.
If all members of this category are carefully screened to make sure they meet the very precise requirements listed, then all is well. If the requirements for remaining a member of this category are rather more vague (for example, if it's partly used as advertising for any brand that wants to be in it and hasn't been removed yet) then we need to rethink a little.
As recommended by the edit notice, I will also "consider visiting the Help desk for a more prompt response or reviewing the Categorization FAQ for quick tips."
Comments welcome. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to put Belen Echandia back in the category, to find out if the other party wanted to discuss the matter further. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standards for inclusion
Talk:Buxwaha

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Defensive design

message: Does it only apply to end-users? What about environmental conditions?
Doesn't it seem to be a newly born term(No references yet)?
It separated the "software engineering" field, so what is it by default? "Hardware Engineering"?
Alifakoor (talk) 08:18, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope/Reference? 

message: Well, there's a flaw in the example about working hours.
"for number of hours worked in one week the amount for any specified employee can be 0, can be fractional, but can't be negative and can't be greater than 168, nor more than 24 times the number of days they were in attendance". The number of hours in a week can be greater than 168 if the user observes Daylight Saving Time. Likewise, the number of hours in a day could be more than 24. MCEmperor (talk) 10:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug in example
Category talk:Terrorist incidents in the United States

message: While I agree that 19th and 20th century lynchings and violence against African Americans and whites who were their allies were a form of terrorism, to combine all that history and add events from those days to the list of "terrorist incidents" seems to be more confusing and misleading than not. In the late 20th and 21st century, "terrorist incident" has a particular kind of meaning.  Individual lynchings and race riots do not seem to be in the same category.  None of these fall within the four sub-categories included in the article. --Parkwells (talk) 15:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disagree with too broad category
Talk:Shining Stars

message: This game is a piece of crap for 1 year olds and only a complete frickin moron would play it. THIS GAME SUCKS!!!
O.K., apparently you hate shining stars. It isn't babyish, though. You have no right to call it crap. Cause' it ain't.-- Nov.30 12:11PM Callsonbaby (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help!
Talk:National Poetry Series

message: I removed the Foetry accusation from the introduction at the top of the page but left the link to Foetry.com at the bottom. Here's my reasoning - that Foetry accused the National Poetry Series of misdeeds is certainly factual. That is to say, it happened. However, the mere fact that Foetry leveled an accusation is not in and of itself notable. More importantly, its placement in the introduction gives this view undue weight. While some of the charges leveled by Foetry turned out to be true (see the Foetry.com WP entry for examples of "successful campaigns"), I see no independently-verified evidence of the charges against the NPS. The suggestion of impropriety may be of interest to the casual reader, and so I've left the external link to the Foetry.com website at the bottom of the page. ProfJeFF (talk) 15:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NTT Data Engineering Systems Corporation

message: * http://www.3dsystems.ru/newsevents/newsreleases/pr-980615.asp.htm - signs deal to sell 3d printers Actua in 1998
* http://www.thefreelibrary.com/RealityWave+and+Hitachi+Zosen+Information+Systems+Join+Forces+to...-a076722914 signs deal with RealityWave in 2001
* http://www10.mcadcafe.com/link/display_detail.php?link_id=20177 makes use of HOOPS in 2007
* http://www.designnews.com/article/CA138191.html  attends big Japanese trade show in 2000
* http://www.secinfo.com/d11MXs.1TKe.d.htm settled litigation relating to lost earnings with 3d systems  in 2004
* http://www2.nict.go.jp/w/w114/stsi/old_raag/APPS/TDC_APPS.pdf employees published a paper about GPS accuracy
* http://www.nttdata.co.jp/en/aboutus/a081.html NTTData has an about us where it says it acquired management rights to HZS in 2006, and then renamed it.  ha!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goatchurch (talk • contribs) 16:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced information
Talk:Tony Lepore

message: Maybe Loodog can help? Also, maybe the title name should be "The Dancing Cop"? Anyways, work in progress.--Tom 16:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is on the front of Yahoo and Fox news did a piece on him. FWIW --Tom 16:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just started
Talk:Stabilizer (ship)

message: Does anyone know of the relative effectiveness of stabilizers? This would be an article I would love to see expanded if anyone knows more about it than I. Thanks! 16:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 14 years have passed with no objections and no sources. I have removed the sentence. Викидим (talk) 08:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old questions 

message: Since that article redirects here, and since that’s linked to at least the M-1 Sherman tank article, I’d kinda like to know. Without having to weed through the jungle.Trying To Make Wikipedia At Least Better Than The Weekly World News. (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like an incorrect wlink to me, I think it should direct to Gyroscope, and not to Stabilizer (ship). Exit2DOS  • Ctrl • Alt • Del 07:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And I didn’t do it.Trying To Make Wikipedia At Least Better Than The Weekly World News. (talk) 16:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Exit2DOS  • Ctrl • Alt • Del 20:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

text: Filled part of the gap by the history of stabilizers in the British and US navies. Викидим (talk) 09:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: ¿What’s a “Gyrostabilizer”?

message: The history jumps from 1934 to 2010. Room for lots more material there! I sailed on RMS Sylvania in 1957 & her stabilizers were regarded as an innovation. Not my area of expertise--anyone have info? --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 14:42, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Filled part of the gap by the history of stabilizers in the British and US navies. Викидим (talk) 09:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History gap 
Template talk:Far Rockaway Branch

message: *Valley Stream
*Rosedale
*Laurelton
*Locust Manor
*Jamaica
:Jim, I believe those are relegated strictly to the Atlantic Branch, which as you know also serves Long Beach Branch trains at those stations. ----DanTD (talk) 14:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure? Because they use that name here and here, and here too. I was going to add the links to various LIRR History-related sites, but the official sites are so much better. ----DanTD (talk) 01:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

text: Then what about this and this? These sites list those stations as being on the Atlantic Branch, even though they serve Far Rockaway Branch trains. It's no different than the Main Line serving Hempstead and Port Jefferson branch trains, or the Montauk Branch serving Babylon, and West Hempstead(in the case of St. Albans) trains. ----DanTD (talk) 12:23, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing stations
Template talk:UK light rail

message: I think this template is getting a little crowded with proposed or given up systems. The three or four Belfast systems, only one of those is likely to happen, because no city builds that many tram systems simultaneously. So IMO, I don't really think they belong there. Likewise, Leeds is a gonner. Merseytram should stay, because there's still hope, it's still in the local transport plan. Also I wouldn't call Edinburgh proposed anymore, it's happening now, so I consider it fairly certain. Tom walker (talk) 14:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CITI etc 

message: Ought Volk's Electric Railway to count as a preserved system? It's right on the borderline between a heritage tramway & a preserved railway (it parallels the road rather than running on it), but in terms of operation - and the type of car - it seems more of a tramway than a railway. —  iridescent 15:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  VER 

message: As I said here, Preston's up and coming metro should be added. I'm not sure about the light rail bit but the bet's are that either Preston should be added or there be a merge. Tez011 (talk) 19:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preston trams 

message: Whether taking the definition light rail or light railway, people movers won't fit this category. To keep the template like this, I'd like to suggest to change the the title to match with the content. KatVanHuis (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title/content