lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KOF: Maximum Impact

message: Can't we just move this to The King of Fighters: Maximum Impact? I mean is there really any doubt in anyone's mind as to what it stands for? Anyways, my main beef with the "KOF" part is that it screws with game lists.
*The King of Fighters '94
*The King of Fighters 2000
*KOF: Maximum Impact
*The King of Fighters XI
Kinda see how it just kills the flow a bit?--SeizureDog 21:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but that is how it's called (and even the announcer pronounces the title "K.O.F."). And if you go there, "'94", "'95", "'96", etc also feel awkward once you reach "2000". And they all look weird once you get to "XI"... 88.161.129.43 (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title 
Talk:Longsight

message: User:Arsebiscuits121 added  here with his first edit.  Sorry, but this article is nowhere near satisfying the criteria to become a featured article. -- ALoan (Talk) 00:26, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Merge The article lays no other claim to notability other than his representation of the Longsight ward.  
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abid Chohan
JASpencer 22:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And added Mohammed Sajjad for same reason. JASpencer 18:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Given the prevelance of Longsight in UK news for its gun-crime levels I feel a new section should be created on 'Crime' similar to that of Moss Side however I lack the knowledge to do so myself.
* Over one hundred news articles on gun crime related to the Longsight area
:: This should probably include the information currently in the "history" section of the page. That's not history but an introduction for those who might wonder why they've heard of Longsight Nogbad (talk) 14:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crime 
Talk:Earl of Carlisle

message: OK, we may need to distinguish Lord Ruthven of Freeland and Lord Ruthven titles. In a 1911 Britannica article, Ruthven (family), we have descriptions of Lords Ruthven of Freeland dating to 1701 at least with dubious claimants after that. When was the title of Lord Ruthven of Freeland attached to the Earldom of Carlisle? Alba 23:16, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Leigh Rayments's Peerage Page, that was in 1982. VM 13:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does Phillip have an heir? Otherwise the Scottish title will deperate from the earldom and we'll need to list the division. Alci12 17:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  HA/HP
Talk:Comparison of OpenGL and Direct3D

message: The chart at the top says Direct3D is not free.. but isn't it free to download and use it in code? Direct3D LieAfterLie (talk) 23:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: At the very least it needs to say what it means by "free".. free to implement? Use commercially? Release in free software? Modify? LieAfterLie (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DirectX Price 

message: Shouldn't there be at least a remark about the handedness difference between OpenGL and Direct3D (right hand vs left hand coordinate system). 
And matrix storage conventions, row major or column major. These ar for me as a developer important differences.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Dekkers (talk • contribs) 12:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handedness 

message: There is no table with features and when they are introduced in OpenGL and DirectX. 
It would be good thing to have such a table. 
Seems best place for it would be a section between Portability and Ease of use in the wikipedia article. 
Features such as introduction of geometry shaders, geometry instancing, separate blend modes per-MRT, pixel shader per sample, tessellation, compute shaders, texture compression, SPIR-V/DXIL, fast packed 16bit math, deterministic fragment ordering: ARB_fragment_shader_interlock/Rasterizer Ordered Views (ROVs), Conservative Rasterization, and many more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:5C0C:D400:E883:60A8:2004:4BF (talk) 23:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing a features section with feature comparison table 
Talk:Cūḷavaṃsa

message: I have found inconsistent information about the time period covered by the Culavamsa. Rhajiv Ratnatunga in his "Editors Note" on the Web version of the Mahavamsa, says it covers the period up to 1815, when the British took over Sri Lanka. A Britannica article, however, says it goes up to the "16th century". I went with Ratnatunga's information, because, first, he seems "closer to the source", second, the History of Sri Lanka article lists the "Great Dynasty" (that is, the Mahavamsa/Culavamsa works) as ending in 1815, and third, because the "16th" in the Britannica article could easily be a mistype of "19th". If anyone is sure I am wrong, please change this, both here and in the Mahavamsa article. — Nowhither 23:25, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: When does the Culavamsa end?

message: Transliterating Pāli into English seems to be an inconsistent business. "Culavamsa", in particular, has three possible variations: the leading "c" can be "ch", the "v" can be a "w", and it might be two words ("Cula Vamsa"). Thus, there are a total of 8 possible transliterations. I did a Google search, and found that by far the most common is "Culavamsa", and so that is where I placed the main article. The next most common was "Chulavamsa", and so I mention this as an alternate spelling both here and in the Mahavamsa article. There were a few pages that used the single-word "w" forms ("Culawamsa" or "Chulawamsa"), and so I made these redirects, but did not mention these alternative spellings on the page. Lastly, I found exactly one page on the whole web that wrote the name as two words, so I did neither redirects nor mentions in the article for the two-word versions. — Nowhither 23:38, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate names
Talk:Bill Brady (journalist)

message: This article seems trumped up.  For instance what did Brady do that demonstrated leadership?  It seems he held positions but says nothing of what he actual did while he was involved.
I can't find any support for Transplant International existing.  Is this defunct?  If so what significance did it ever have?
:. -Splash 23:52, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I Googled "Transplant International Bill Brady" and came up with (among lots and lots of other things) a quote form the estemable and noble Mr. Bill Brady, 
"In the mid ‘80s, Dr. Cal Stiller, who was chief of the Transplant Unit of University Hospital, invited me to be part of a new initiative, Transplant International, and for years our group worked in all parts of Canada to raise public awareness of the urgent and growing need for organ donors as hundreds of Canadians waited for life-saving transplants. 
The letter I have quoted came to us at the very time we were attempting to get a vital message to hospitals and the professionals who live with the reality of death almost daily in emergency rooms and intensive care units. We felt families facing the imminent loss of a loved one needed to be given the opportunity to rescue something positive from their loss. We urged nurses in the critical care areas, the doctors and chaplains to discuss organ donation with the family even as they worked their way through their shock and grief." 
Hes almost a saint, wouldn't you agree?. I prostrate myself at his very feet. This winter I'm going to go shovel his driveway. For free. I may name my first born child Bill now. I urge you to do the same. Hamster Sandwich 00:21, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

text: That's not a compromise at all; writing an article for him was the justification to keep him on the list. Adam Bishop 03:48, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If you look at the Wikipedia entry for Executive, you will find that the vice-presidency of a company qualifies him as such. I will add executive to the Manager blue link that was substituted thus giving the reader more information, and making his article more complete. Thanks for the addition of Manager! Hamster Sandwich 03:44, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brady as executive 

message: Bill Brady is Zorra Township's Senior of the Year! If this doesn't make him notable, I don't know what does! (I assume this story is in the Free Press; I saw it in the Woodstock Sentinel-Review.) Adam Bishop 02:57, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the story, by the way. Adam Bishop 19:29, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

text: It was a joke. (Well, he did win it, but it was a joke that it makes him notable, I was just poking fun at the notability argument surrounding him...see, now it's not funny because I've explained it...) Adam Bishop 16:56, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zorra
Template talk:Cfr2

message: 
Please add  between the . Thanks. -- Suntag ☼ 01:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 05:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Documentation

message: See discussion at Template talk:Cfd2#Remove leading colons. User:GKFXtalk 21:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove leading colons
Talk:Phocylides

message: What is meant with the citation llotnua vovO~rtK6v or 7v&~/2cu? --Killaruna | talk 2 me! 17:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The original Greek letters can be found in , I guess an OCR program messed that up. --FloSch 23:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll find it now in Greek letters here--Pandelion 13:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:WETA-TV

message: I recently posted an inquiry about an old movie i saw in the 80s on WETA.  Please see "Talk:Blindness" for the deatils.  it was about a guy stung by a big plant who woke up the morning after a comet visited earth to find everyone having gone blind.  Would really like to remember the name. -Husnock 18:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old Blindness Movie

message: as near as I can tell from the WETA website, this podcast ended in 2008.  If so, I question whether it is still relevant, particularly in view of all the other currently produced programs and podcasts that are not mentioned in the article.  GodaiNoBaka (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author, Author! 

message: There should be a disambiguation from WETA workshops  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C4%93t%C4%81_Workshop , particularly as both operate in the same industry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.146.3 (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Togepi

message: Togepi's missing those sections and I'd really like to see one of them added, if not both. I'll try and start it but I doubt I can finish it on my own. --Floramage! 19:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Um... What happened to Appearance and Biology?

message: I've noticed an image (referred to as a "pet image") repeatedly added and removed from the article over the course of the day.  Personally, I don't care much for that picture, but you know what picture I think we really need?  We need a picture of Togepi being cradled in Misty's arms.  Togepi was so significant for always being on screen with Misty; Togepi, during its run in the cartoon, was on-screen as much as Pikachu.  --Brandon Dilbeck 22:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pet image 

message: The first thing I noticed with this article is that there is no section about the biological characteristics of Togepi.  Another point I want to ask about is whether Misty's Togepi exhibits typical behavior.  That is, Misty's Togepi acts like a baby all the time.  Are there any sources to demonstrate that this is or isn't typical of all Togepi?  --Brandon Dilbeck 00:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really want to edit the article and add information on Togepi's weight, call etc. and some trivia, but I can't find my Pokemon book and I haven't got Togepi on the game, either. My computer seems to go funny if I go on anything other than Wikipedia or if I leave it alone for 2 seconds to do some research... Can someone add it, please. 80.41.122.6 18:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Biological Characteristics" is for the video games ONLY.  The anime is not covered in that. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavior 

message: There is official confirmation that Togepi is a baby pokemon, go on to Pokemon-games.com and click on the Pokedex and go down to togepi and it says Baby: Togepi Basic: Togetic. DSDark 19:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out, it might be very useful information!  The reason that Baby isn't showing up in Togepi's infobox is because that parameter of the infobox for ALL of the Pokémon's infoboxes is turned off (mainly because of the debate of what Togepi's stage is!).  I'm going to bring this up at the Pokémon Collaborative Project to see what others think.  --Brandon Dilbeck 21:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Togepi is a Baby
Talk:Shinjiro Otani

message: I find it impossible to believe that Shinjiro Ohtani lives in Texas. Is it possible this was just a mistake since Funaki from WWE lives there and the person made a mistake. Punch999 (talk) 04:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texas?
Talk:Shimon Schwab

message: Would anyone have access to a public domain image of Rav Schwab? If this is impossible, shall we contact the Jewish Observer if they would licence an image from their stock? JFW | T@lk 00:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: How can I get it to you?
Sorry I didn't see your comment until you left a message on my talkpage. I've left some advice there. JFW | T@lk 20:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He supported the Agudath Yisrael Party in Israel.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.247.138 (talk) 06:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also emailed the KAJ webmaster asking if they could release any images of the subject under the GFDL. JFW | T@lk 11:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement and expansion 

message: We may need to cover this from the bio in "Prayer":
:Much later, the Rav would discover that the renowned Rav Yehudah HaChassid predicted in his will, written some 800 years earlier, that "a man in the Land of Schwaben (the area where lchenhausen is located) would not be successful in educating young boys as yeshivah students." (See Sefer Chassidim, Margaliyos ed., last item of the Tsava'a, §56.)
Curious how encyclopedic it might be. JFW | T@lk 09:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schwaben 

message: The publication of his works continues. His son has informed that work is ongoing on the books of Ezra and Nehemia. JFW | T@lk 11:19, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ezra/Nehemia 
Talk:Business Continuity Institute

message: I came here to find out more about the "Business Continuity Institute", after seeing it mentioned in a job description. Unfortunately, this page contains no information about what makes this institution "accredited" in any way, and what impact it has in the grander scheme of things. Instead, not only are there no sources (as per the other tag), the claims that are made are also entirely positive and read like an advert ("the name is instantly recognised as standing for good practice and professionalism").
I'd fix it, if I knew anything about this organization - unfortunately, I don't. Quark999 (talk) 23:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV dispute

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Captain Charles Johnson

message: Disproved?  How when where?  Although it is known that it cannot be proved conclusively that Daniel Defoe was indeed Captain Charles Johnson, the opposite cannot be proven conclusively either.  In fact the evidence is stronger in favor of Charles Johnson being a pseudonym of Daniel Defoe than the opposite. No record of any Captain Charles Johnson has ever been found, among the copious amounts of circumstantial evidence in favor of him being Daniel Defoe.  If you want examples, I'll be glad to provide, and if there is conclusive evidence that it is not, please provide it because without anything to back up that statement it is nothing but speculation.
:Its publication certainly matches Defoe's interest and publication in "true crime" works.  In 1724 he was studying Jack Sheppard and was profiling prostitutes and, of course, Jonathan Wild.  Furthermore, he was a whig and would have seen the play by Charles Johnson the playwright.  Then again, there were several people writing criminal catalogs.  No one can prove a negative without asserting a positive.  Geogre 03:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Daniel Defoe claim
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World Wars

message: Just a test to see if the message mechanism works. --Dna-Dennis 00:35, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is the first message 

message: I think that the Imperialism is one of the causes of WW I and should be included as well. Regards, John N. 12:14, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imperialism 

message: This is/could be a great and needed project. My interest within this project is mainly on WWII where I'd like us to (among other things) aim for consistancy in facts and numbers across the many WP articles. Where articles are disagreeing (and there are some), we should go for the facts in the article with the most limited scope, and adjust the other numbers acordingly. Having different numbers on, say, the main WW2 article and on World War II casualties is obviously wrong. If there are disagreements on what numbers to use, I sugest we limit discussions (and revert-wars) to the most specialised article instead of having them all over the place. So, as an example, if there is a debate on the number of casualties in a battle, the article on that battle should be the number we use in the main ww2 article (and other places) pr default. And if someone wants a change to that number in the WW2 article, we should point them to the battle article and ask for changes and discussions to take place there first before we change anything in the main WW2 article.
This way we scale better. People with interest and knowledge on a sub-topic of WW2 are much more likely to only be watching the article(s) on that topic and not even knowing about any discussion about numbers and whatnot going on in the main WW2 article. So the main WW2 article should just mirror facts and figures settled in the various sub-articles. Shanes 02:07, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency in numbers and facts across articles 

message: Since this project doesn't appear to be active, would there be any objections to merging it to the Military history WikiProject (particularly since we now have a World War II task force that should be able to pick up some of this work)? —Kirill Lokshin 03:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy with that, particularly since I'm more active over at WikiProject Military history, but you should probably ask John N. directly since he set this up. Leithp 14:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like it here. But it looks like its not working here anyway. So ok. -- John N. 15:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history]]? 

message: Hello, WWII experts.  I'm not sure if this is the right place to post about this old abandoned Afc submission.  It will soon be deleted unless someone thinks it's worth keeping and improving.  There is already Korematsu v. United States.  —Anne Delong (talk) 21:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fred T. Korematsu Institute for Civil Rights and Education]]
Talk:Mound

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 00:34, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: This is an ok article (good for the links if nothing else) but can be improved and is worth keeping because these "mounds" represent very important ancient history of North America. 
Especially bad is this sentence: While the term "mound" may be applied to historic constructions, most mounds in the United States are pre-columbian earthworks, built by Native American peoples.
The so-called native peoples of North America have so many of their own histories (most notably the Hopi People but many others as well including Meso-American sources from Central America) that clearly state these ancient "mounds" were already here in North America when they first migrated here (making then non-native peoples) and whoever built them were already gone. If they themselves know they migrated here from elsewhere and that the "mounds" (many of which can still clearly be seen to have been pyramids) were already here when they got here - why on earth is this not respected by white American scholars? The article "mound builder" discusses the possibilities of who may have built them.
valkyree 18:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Archaeologists are very sure who built them. Some of them were pyramidal structures, built by peoples of the Troyville culture, Coles Creek culture, Plum Bayou culture, Plaquemine culture and the Mississippian culture, ancestors of modern day Native Americans, and all of them pretty firmly dated and placed within a cultural continuity. No need for ancient Aliens, Atlanteans, Trans-Pacific/Atlantic diffusion or any other such balderdash. Heiro 20:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: new section
Talk:Moral economy

message: Well, I tried rewriting the "Utopian Moral Economies" section to make it a little less POV, though it still needs work. What does everyone think? -- User:Brodie, 21/08/05
I cannot understand why anyone has seriously disputed the balance of this piece as I find it extremely fair. Of course, one can hardly mention the word 'Israel' in any context without having 'crimes against Palestine' brought into the equation (though never the reverse of course). But certainly the term moral economy is related to intent and surely it is without dispute that kibbutzim were organised along ideological and utopian concepts in terms of its own community at least. If we're going to dispute this point, then we might as well dispute the claims to a moral economy of any society that slaughters animals for food which wipes out ALL of the above examples  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Augusta de grey (talk • contribs) 12:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Balance and POV

message: The article survived a Vote for Deletion in August 2005: see the archived VfD page. -- JimR 01:58, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD 

message: Given what I've read about the relationship between Kibbutzes and surrounding Palestinian populations, even in their golden age, the suggestion that they were somehow a moral economy seems to be seriously lacking in...moral consistency.
I think kibbitz could be loosely defined under the heading 'moral economy' because of their intention to run their economies on a 'moral' basis (i.e. based around religious ethics rather than on neoclassical economics). That's not to saw they were 'moral' by our standards any more than Soviet collectivization.
User: 15:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kibbutz as moral economy 