Talk:Black is beautiful

message: Needs to cite sources, organize in encyclopedic fashion rather than essay fashion, and remove opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roscelese (talk • contribs) 17:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the article overall needs to be proofread for grammar, tone, and flow. Right now it reads as very unacademic. NeptunianJellyfish (talk) 21:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Essay-opinion

message: I'm going to remove that link right away. It is an outrage to have such a link posted on a wikipedia artikel and quite frankly it's discussting! 
hvh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.66.220.205 (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: blackisbeautiful.se

message: Needs more the origin of this movement.  Malcom X is credited for spreading it.  Who else? Stillwaterising (talk) 00:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins

message: It seems to me that the illustration used in this article is kind of misleading.  The poster obviously references the original movement, but uses it just as a a word play with its own party colors (the JU is the youth organisation of the conservative party, which is associated with the color black).  Maybe someone with more political insight might want to shed some light on this, but I'd suggest to use an illustration from the actual movement and not something designed by an advertising agency years later in a completely different context.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.54.101 (talk) 21:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration poster

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Black is beautiful. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071220045250/http://www.bucks.edu/~docarmos/BCMnotes.html to http://www.bucks.edu/~docarmos/BCMnotes.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I never thought I would ever say that ever that on Wikipedia but...this Wikipedia article needs (among others) more pictures of beautiful black women. : )
There are some keys dates such as the first black model, or the first black model to have travelled abroad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OPAZL (talk • contribs) 20:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs pictures 

message: the expression itself surely comes from song of solomons 1:4-5 "Nigra sum, sed formosa" (I am black, but [i am] beautiful), and various choral adaptations thereof, no?  why no discussion of that in the article?  2601:19C:5280:5BA7:8839:7D45:3921:410B (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible! 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  Favonian (talk) 19:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Black is Beautiful →  – Per WP:NCCPT QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:49, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 July 2022 

message: — Assignment last updated by BY1243 (talk) 18:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Contemporary Black Popular Culture

message: Why is the "colorism" part in the Controversy section, even though it contains absolutely no controversial materiel, and why is the word racism, which is colorism, not mentioned in the section? Encyclopédisme (talk) 20:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the entire "controversy" section is missing any controversies.. Encyclopédisme (talk) 20:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy