lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Umberto Guidoni

message: Interesting.  The two astronauts/cosmonauts in the European Parliament are both communists: Umberto Guidoni and Vladimír Remek. – Kaihsu 18:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Over a long span of time, there has been constant unmotivated removals of mentions of Guidoni's political affiliation. The last revert had an edit summary stating "Removed "member of Communist Party" because is not true - by Umberto Guidoni", which (if true) would imply a WP:COI problem.
With some googling, it can be understood that Guidoni no longer is a member of PCdI but has left the party and joined Sinistra e Liberta instead. (see  and italian interwiki). Such a mention can be included in the article with reference. But there is no reason to remove the mention that Guidoni was in fact elected as a candidate of PCdI in 2004. To avoid stating the party identity of an elected parliamentarian would be quite odd. And the categories 'members of...' do not apply only to current members, but also past members. --Soman (talk) 13:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political identity
Talk:Vladimír Remek

message: Interesting.  The two astronauts/cosmonauts in the European Parliament are both communists: Umberto Guidoni and Vladimír Remek. – Kaihsu 18:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Czech embassy in Russia. rado 19:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Quoth the article:
an independent candidate for the Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia and, being second on the list...
What does "independent" mean in this context?  If he was on the Communist Party's list, surely he isn't independent, which would mean that he wasn't a member of any party, yes? --Jfruh (talk) 17:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he wasn't. He was a member of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia till 1990. --Anglos (talk) 13:31, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Then can you explain what the "list" of referred to is?  And just having been a former member of the Czechoslovak communist party doesn't make him a "candidate for the Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia." --Jfruh (talk) 02:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent? 
Talk:Rail transport in Paraguay

message: Sorry for writing such a bad stub, but unfortunately the official site of Paraguay railroads ( http://www.ferrocarriles.com.py ) stopped working and there are very few information sources online.
Some tips for improvements:
- there is a CD with overview of history and other details - http://www.paraguay-cd.de/espanol/seite2zugspn.htm - perhaps somebody has it?
- the mail address of Ferrocarriles is ferroca@rieder.net.py - perhaps they have something to share (if you speak Spanish)?
--Sapfan 18:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bennie Owen

message: In the introduction paragraph and infobox the birth year is listed as "1875". But, the first sentence of the "Overview" section says "1874". Which is it? - 4.240.159.79 (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1874 or 1875? 
Talk:Vernon Area Public Library

message: Yes, this is a copyright violation, and I will try to rewrite the page. However, it is not a commercial copyright violation, and therefore doesn't qualify for speedy deletion. TruthbringerToronto 19:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Moved the page to drop the word "District" at the end. No library documents still use this term since 2013, nor does media coverage about the library. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 02:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Mr. E. Blackadder

message: which incarnation of baldrick is thus described in the dramatis personae?Toyokuni3 (talk) 16:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Baldrick, a dogsbody

message: The books in the opening credits lead me to believe Edmund Blackadder, Esq lived from 1760 to 1827.  Where do the years 1762-1830 come from? Kanenas (talk) 06:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Years Edmund Blackadder lived
Talk:Operation Deadlight

message: Why did Russia and the US oppose salvage of the subs? Drutt (talk) 20:34, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Russia & US

message: "When Operation Deadlight was activated, it was found that many of the U-boats were in an extremely poor condition as a result of being moored in exposed harbours while awaiting disposal."
How can a submarine, which by definition must be able to withstand harsh oceanic conditions, be left in extremely poor condition just by sitting in an unprotected harbor? Did the Germans make very low quality U-boats towards the end of the war? --The Vital One (talk) 00:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Explanation Requested 

message: Never mind the historical value; they wouldn't mean much if there was a ex-U-boat in every town along the coast...but think of all that good steel. And this is jut a small fraction of the good scrap they just dumped into the oceans rather than be bothered with cutting it all up. We could spend the money and effort to BUILD all these tanks and planes, but not to cut them up and melt them down again. Sad. Aircraft being bulldozed into big pits or dumped off of barges into the ocean. AnnaGoFast (talk) 01:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a waste.
Talk:Anti-Leninism

message: The aforementioned scope issues haven't been addressed in the last decade. It would be sufficient to address opposition to Lenin's platform in a section of the existing Leninism article. For instance, its coverage of Trotsky's opposition is sufficient. I don't see anything I'd immediately merge from this article. czar 01:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Talk:Air superiority fighter

message: Su-57 is specifically designed as a multirole as seen in its design and also patent. The large internal bays are specifically sized for air to ground weapons and Sukhoi even highlighted the multirole capability as a contrast to the F-22 which is a dedicated air superiority fighter. The Rafale and Su-35 also falls into this since it is also designed from the outset to have robust strike capabilities. 2600:8802:4513:1E00:9596:3E03:9F94:649F (talk) 06:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft that’s not air superiority fighters
Talk:Here Comes Your Man

message: Even if Frank Black didn't mention it in the interview, I think the ironic allusion to the atomic bombing of Nagasaki made in this song is definitely worth noting under Meaning. If you don't know what I'm talking about, the plane that dropped "Fat Man" was named Bock's Car. There's a shake on the Bock's car as the bomb drops, shake on the ground as it detonates, it's a "big, big stone," the wait for it to hit seems to take very long, and so forth. --Stripes238 19:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st

message: I was told it was about getting drugs; hooking up with your drug dealer. Which makes it much more subversive. ClintJCL (talk) 17:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Got a source? mheart (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

text: You're probably thinking of the Velvet Underground's "I'm Waiting for My Man". WesleyDodds (talk) 11:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: That's strange

message: The chord at the beginning of this track is not the 'Hendrix chord', it's close to or may be a C7sus4......but it's not the dominant7#9 Hendrix chord.
98.151.187.61 (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the Hendrix chord

message: Apparently I'm not allowed to add to this page the true meaning of this song (the bombings of Japan). Every time I do, it gets undone by WesleyDodds.Rjk1991 (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What sources do you have for that claim, ? --John (talk) 21:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I give up
Talk:Old Town, Edinburgh

message: Two users have recently engaged in multiple reverts regarding the choice of UK or Scotland "World Heritage Site" template. I'm going to carefully avoid making any statement here about which I think is the better, but I note from the edit summaries that one of the templates is currently undergoing a templates for deletion discussion here, and I'd like to support the suggestion implicit in one of the summaries that this battle be held off until that debate is over. It will presumably raise many of the pertinent issues. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 19:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, just noticed this (and the edit history) now. I put all the Scotland temps back on and added my $0.02 to the discussion. ~ trialsanderrors 03:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Kieran above that the edit wars should stop until the matter of the Scotland template is resolved at TfD. it is important the other editors see that a template is up for deletion so they can weigh in on the discussion. So please keep the Scotland template up until the TfD is over. ~ trialsanderrors 20:55, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template wars

message: Am I right in thinking that the Old Town is the area of the original royal burgh? Laurel Bush 11:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To a certain degree, although many people would today use "Old Town" to refer to the bottom half of the Mile too... Of course, it was the separate Royal Burgh of Canongate (note in our article we say Canongate is part of the Old Town). Thanks/wangi 11:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Town is the original royal burgh? 

message: Sorry, her's a maybe silly question from a german Ian Rankin-reader: Does Mary King's Close really exist? (See Ian Rankin: 'Mortal Causes'). Thanks! --Grottenolm (talk) 07:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they run tours to it several times a day & have talks by actors as how it was long ago. 70.97.122.47 (talk) 18:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mary King's Close 

message: Surely the State party in the World Hertiage Infobox should be the UK not Scotland? Penrithguy (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Party 

message: I see this has been removed. "Large squares mark the location of markets or surround major public buildings such as in front of the Tron Kirk, and surrounding St Giles Cathedral and the supreme courts." I do not want to edit-war but I am pretty sure this is correct information. --John (talk) 18:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squares
Talk:Sergey Platonov

message: 10:00, 27 June 2006 Ghirlandajo (Talk | contribs) (no need)
Why was my entry deleted?
:Because the bibliography consisting of one title looks silly. It is not informative, while the headings in a stub look slovenly. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Noble M400

message: " Additionally the Sparco Alcantara seats and finishings differ from the other Nobles'"
To me this says "Additionally the Sparco Alcantara seats and finishings differ from (the finishings belonging to other Nobles" - therefore plural possessive applies. We aren't saying that the cars are generally different, we are specifically talking about the finishings of those cars. 136.158.59.173 (talk) 07:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that sentence would be fine if it ended with finishings - but as written it's just not very clear. Is there an objection of hyphenating one third in a manner consistent with MOS:FRAC? Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  grammar
Talk:Red Clay Consolidated School District

message: okay....not true. Brandywine and Lake Forest are not in RCCSD (Lake is in fact about an hour away from the closest Red Clay school). Cab Calloway, Charter, and the Military Academy are not really high schools within the district, per se, but offshoots of the traditional programs that are supported fiscally by RCCSD. They should realistically be included under a separate heading from Dickinson, McKean, and A.I.
:Didn't know whether Conrad Schools of Science should go under Supported Schools or not... unlike Charter, it is not a charter school, it's a magnet school.  I guess someone who knows more than me needs to make this decision.  Also, Conrad Middle School is no more (even the RCCSD link to it now redirects to CSoS), didn't know whether to delete it or just note that it no longer exists.  Again, someone else decide, erring on the side of caution for now! --Injoy 20:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Higgins Glass

message: Your Grace, I just reviewed the history of your edits and every single one of them improved the article! You do great work and I really appreciate having you polish my (extremely) rough entries. I reckon I owe you a whole bag of Wiki-cookies for this. --Doc Tropics 19:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I just added a link to that specific article in the Christian Science Monitor, but I don't think I did it right. Help? --Doc Tropics 19:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right-o, I think i've fixed the link, just check that from your end to make sure, I think there's a dodgy cookie somewhere. The article looks about ready now. Do you want to submit it to Template talk:Did you know, or shall I? CaptainVindaloo t c e 20:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok. And I've just copied this to your usertalk, thought you'd missed it. CaptainVindaloo t c e 20:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link 

message: Ok, how's this:
...that Higgins Glass refers to fused glass functional artwork produced by Michael and Frances Higgins of Chicago, in the latter half of the 20th Century?
CaptainVindaloo t c e 20:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. CaptainVindaloo t c e 21:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Draft DYK entry

message: ++Lar: t/c 17:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article was selected for [[WP:DYK|DYK]]! 

message: Since this one is not listed under AFD and is a notable piece of art.  I have removed the AFD Tag.  It must have been added during the recent W.O.W. Attack on Wikipedia. Aeon 14:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The IP responsible also did the same to Old Market, so I gave a blatantvandal warning. It seems like such an honour to get the WoW treatment! CaptainVindaloo t c e 18:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not sure oh well at least it is fixed Aeon 18:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since having a page vandalized means someone actually noticed your work and cared enough to deface it, I'm willing to accept it as a compliment :) --Doc Tropics 18:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe we should put a tag up saying "This article was vandalised by Willy on Wheels!", like a Featured Article tag. CaptainVindaloo t c e 18:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD Message

message: I just removed a large block of text from this article because it was copied verbatim from the "History" page of the Higgins Glass website  - Xenxax (talk) 12:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of a large block of text
Talk:Umatilla Chemical Depot

message: Some of the material in this article is copied directly from the website in the external links=needs rewriting. Katr67 19:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: U.S. federal material is non-copyrighted and is useable here. Rmhermen 03:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: copied material
Talk:Skips (snack)

message: Does anyone know what the actual shape and colouration of the individual Skips was meant to represent? A sea urchin? A flower? Very distinctive pattern, with no explanation. I think some mention of the shape on this page would be a good thing, given how very unusual it was.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.99.153.68 (talk) 13:59, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Unique Shape

message: I am removing -the afd was just posted, no agreement was reached whatsoever, as was claimed. it was either the wrong tag, or blatant falsehood claim by tagger. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: false speedy tagging

message: There are a number of questions here... (1) Are the snacks still manufactured in Japan, and how do they differ (if at all) from Skips? (2) What are they called in Japanese? (3) Do KP have to pay an annual licence fee to Meiji or was it a one-off and permanent licence or what? (4) Are they as well known in Japan as Skips are in the UK? 10:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Japan
Talk:Ordnance, Oregon

message: I know Ordnance had street names like "Explosive Ave" and "Cartridge St". It might be interesting to note this in the article. However, since this is original research (from my observation of 50-year-old original source material), I need to find another source. Any help would be appreciated. Katr67 19:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The GNIS coordinates lead to a location on the Umatilla Army Depot. I spoke to the gate guard about the town of Ordnance, and he said that he remembered the town being south of I84, west of the water tower. I drove to that location, 45°47'48", 119°25'01",  and snapped the new photo. The structure is what remains of the general store. Also I emailed the GNIS manager and suggested the database be updated to reflect the new coordinates.Visitor7 (talk) 02:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Change in GNIS Coordinates
Talk:Infant Terrible

message: I don't mean to belittle the importance of American comics, but the term is also used when not referring to a certain marvel character. Please create a page to reflect this. I'm a lazy slob and furthermore I don't know how to do it. Thank you, thank you. 77.183.99.161 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More general meaning

message: Is there really any support for the claim "The story of Infant Terrible apparently inspired the Star Trek episode The Squire of Gothos"?  The concept of very-powerful-being-who-is-a-child was hardly invented in the Fantastic Four.  Even assuming Squire of Gothos wasn't an independent creation of a common archetype, why would it have been specifically inspired by the FF character and not any of the numerous other examples in science fiction literature?
--Suttkus 23:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, nobody's chimed in with any references and my efforts to find anything solid on the Internet have turned up nothing, so I'm going to assume that this is just one of those examples of people assuming correlation equals causation.  I'm removing the line as unsupported speculation.  If someone brings in something solid, they can put it back. --Suttkus 19:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek inspiration 

message: Well, he's back, he's now known as the Delinquent and he's having a very bad time in Annihilation. I guess we need to update accordingly --Mrph 07:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Annihilation
Talk:2002 South Australian state election

message: Per http://web.archive.org/web/20040822024427/www.crikey.com.au/politics/2002/02/03-saelectiontips.html what were the "delays due to loopholes"? Timeshift (talk) 10:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 4 years 4 months in fact. I'm sure the delay was legal, and Crikey observes that Labor didn't complain. If we can find the rules about election dates we should put them in, but calling it "loopholes" is a bit of colourful language by Crikey and I don't think we should put it in. Peter Ballard (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Normally in the Westminster system the time limit is on the life of a parliament not the period between elections. Normally there's a period of some weeks between polling day and the clock starting with the new parliament formally opening. If that parliament runs to the absolute maximum of its life then there's a further period of some weeks before polling day in the next election. Timrollpickering (talk) 13:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1997 - 2002, 5 years?
Talk:Mo

message: I propose a merger of MO into Mo. That way we can collect all the abbreviations in one page. Punkmorten 20:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that would be fine. Isoxyl 20:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I removed Mohammed from the list, as his page provides no indication that he is or was called "Mo." Matchups 02:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mohammed 

message: I recomend that the section abbreviation and codes should be divided into more detailed sections.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddie123e (talk • contribs) 05:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section division
Talk:Airness

message: Je souhaiterais vous faire part de mes idees concernant les prochaines collections d airness avec l aide de mes collaboratrices.
Translation:
I would like to break the news of my ideas concerning the next airness collections with the help of my collaborators. Calliopejen1 16:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:S60 Platform and Symbian OS

message: This article seems to cover what is also covered in Nokia S60.  Seems to make sense to keep this in one place. Vegaswikian 20:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge

message: Perhaps if we don't merge any of the above articles some of them need their names changed, clearly disambiguating them? Mathiastck 21:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change names? 

message: As I just stumbled on the page I don't know the full story here, but if the code names are kept so secret how could they be cited properly?  If a reliable source can be cited do so, and they should be kept if encyclopedic, otherwise they should not be mentioned as it is just rumor.  EnsRedShirt 11:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. If the list created before is deemed unverifiable and thus unsuitable, I'm happy to concede its removal on that ground. 84.231.1.136 14:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An uninvolved parties comment on the code name revert war
Talk:Coastal zone color scanner

message: Note: the text of the Technical details section is basically copy & pasted from the second reference , on the presumption that it's NASA text & therefore PD.  Davepape 20:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical Details source

message: interesting article, but could someone add the optical resolution and a brief discussion relating this system to other optical satellite systems of the same era (e.g. KH-11)? thanks Covalent 19:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Resolution and relation to other systems

message: I don't get it. I know about pitch on an airplane but which axis is pitch on a sensor in space?
What is this glint issue? --Gbleem 19:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sun glint and pitch axis 
Talk:Swingnose crossing

message: This really does look like a pain when you look at it. --martianlostinspace 11:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I can understand how it works in general by looking at the diagram, but the only photo supplied of it just shows a mess of random rails: I can't tell what I'm looking at, or which rail is which, or exactly which piece is supposed to be the swingnose crossing (I'd I'm fairly familiar with rail-related stuff). A "before and after" photo showing a simple switch would be nice, maybe even with arrows pointing out what different parts are, where the wheels will be going? AnnaGoFast (talk) 23:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs better images, captions, maybe labels