Talk:EyeTap

message: I'm pretty sure this doesn't exist. It purports to do most of what google
glass did in 2001. The only references I can find to a "functioning" prototype
are here. Which is pretty dissimilar from
their claims. This might not be an outright scam, but they are definitely stretching the truth. Can someone who knows
how wikipedia works flag this as misinforming?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.62.28 (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This doesn't exist 

message: Article EyeTap listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 22 to Apr 29 2004, consensus was to keep.  Discussion:
A term that is used to descrbe what appears to be a head mounted display. Not used by anyone else I know.
* Keep. 40,500 google hits from a variety of organizations and even multiple languages. They all seem to refer back to Mann's basic concept and/or device (which appears to be a very specific type of head-mounted display). Rossami 21:40, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD Archived debate 

message: Eyetap devices effectively locate both a camera and display in the eye, by way of diverting light that would otherwise enter the eye, and then re-synthezing it.  So in answer to your question, the device is only optically in the eye, not directly attached into the eye.  When you look at someone wearing an eyetap, you see the illusion as if the system was inside their eye, simply because of how the optical arrangement works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glogger (talk • contribs) 03:53, 23 October 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  EyeTap diverter 

message: As a casual reader, I couldn't understand most of this article, even though it is about something that struck me as interesting.  I tend to think most people wouldn't quite get it, so maybe some modifications in favor of "layman's terms" might help.  Cheers Paul 04:02, 29 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unintelligible 

message: I googled "EyeTap" and it appears to be a private thing, as evidenced by the capital letters in the article itself, etc. - does anybody else see it? This barely only mentions the company, and refers to the name of the thing as something almost commonplace. I don't even know if this deserves its own page. Verisimilarity (talk) 22:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advertisment. 

message: C. Aimone with a one-eyed injection-molded EyeTap... And who the f**k is C. Aimone exactly? Don't you think, that if it is somebody important that this person should be referenced in the article text, otherwise it should be "A person with a one-eyed injection-molded EyeTap"? -- White rotten rabbit (talk) 16:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The caption was changed, thanks Septegram -- White rotten rabbit (talk) 15:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image caption 

message: The aspect ratio of the picture showing inventor Steve Mann is wrong. Could somebody please correct it? I would do it myself, except I don't know how to do it. -- White rotten rabbit (talk) 09:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Aspect ratio changed, thanks Obankston -- White rotten rabbit (talk) 09:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong aspect ratio 

message: Is it attached screwed into the bone of the skull?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.96.38.41 (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK, you wear it like a pair of glasses. - M0rphzone (talk) 04:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attachment 

message: I mean I'm not a deletionist, but we have shorter articles on much more meaningful topics. M4bwav (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article seems like an out dated love letter to Steve Mann