Talk:Lambda Theta Alpha

message: Note to closing administrator:
This article asserts notability in that it claims to be the first Latina sorority in existence and doesn't meet CSD A7. I would suggest bringing this article to the AfD process. Alphachimp talk 23:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any AfD (deletion) discussion was resolved long ago. Jax MN (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment at creation

message: LTA is a respectable organization. Why people in general would rather post objectionable questions or commentary only generate negativity within the Latino community. The long smirked quote "Can't we all just get along" should be the anthem for all us Latino "Greeks" who are trying to get ahead in this world. Those who choose this type of outlet versus a face to face conversation only shows the immaturity, jealously and perhaps fear that people can be so organized and successful. Perhaps it is also due to the technology that is stimulating less physical discussion and more "cyber" relationships. At any rate I wish well to all organizations as we all hold a needed place for your younger generations to learn and grow. My best to all out there. Najia Said - Lambda Theta Nu Sorority, Inc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.221.177.89 (talk) 22:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Latino bias? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://lta.orgsync.com/History. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Naraht (talk) 14:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem, content removed 

message: As an unaffiliated editor, I've just completed an extensive revision of the chapter list table.  The WLs are now correct, and fields for "location", "status" and "notes" have been added.  Some stylistic adjustments were made to the chapter names, and two additional references were added. 
Now, the question remains, if this national has created 150 or so chapters, a fact I do not doubt, based on the referenced sources, it is still dubious to claim that all but one of them remain active.  No other national fraternity or sorority claims this significant a level of chapter retention. I would expect that several dozen, perhaps more, are closed, or that alumni from those schools retain a chapter in name only, but would like to see this addressed in the table.  Note too, the national website doesn't differentiate whether a chapter is closed: see how they handled Omicron chapter at Upsala College.  --It still has an email link but no chapter website. For their part, Baird's lists all but Omicron as active, but this appears to be due to a lack of information to the contrary. Jax MN (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active chapters