lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:After Dark Horrorfest

message: Is it true that there are tons of movies made each year that are never made public due to graphic content?
:More than likely the tagline is for publicityCharlieP216 22:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confirmation

message: The trailer on the official page now advertises "8 More Films 2 Die 4" Horrorfest 2007.  I recomend that Horrorfest stops being a redirect page and should have general information about the After Dark Films and Lionsgate run project.  This seems like it may become a yearly event (with contests).  Antmusic 18:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "8 More Films 2 Die 4" 

message: All of this information about this year's Horrorfest is great, but what I want is a list of theatres that wil be hosting this event.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.31.50 (talk) 02:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  theatres 

message: Last year there was the special movie you could only get into with stubs from the 8 movies.  I haven't seen any information about that this year, does anyone know if they're still gonna do it? Jedispyder 22:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there was we probably we would have heard about it, so I don't think so.--CyberGhostface 23:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 bonus film(s)? 

message: Does anyone else think this should be moved to "After Dark Horrorfest"?--CyberGhostface (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New title?
Talk:Amago Okihisa

message: His name "Enya Okihisa" is more famous in Japan. Wikipedia English version is "Amago Okihisa" though it is "Enya Okihisa" in the article on Japan. I think that name should change to the item of "Enya Okihisa".--Christina Tris (talk) 07:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: About his name
Talk:Masahiko Amakasu

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 10:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The Macro Polo Bridge incident was in 1937 while Puyi went to Manchuria in 1931. The chronology is wrong here.--A.S. Brown (talk) 07:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Some problems
Talk:Can Heironymus Merkin Ever Forget Mercy Humppe and Find True Happiness?

message: I wonder if this movie has the record for having the longest title, i.e., the most words in the title.  I know when I play charades, and act out "movie" and "11 words" ... it's not hard for the others to guess the movie title right away. (I remember seeing the movie years ago in a theatre, and I was the only one who seemed to enjoy it.)Que-Can (talk) 23:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

message: While the name "Hieronymus" is usually spelled with i before e -- as in the painter Hieronymus Bosch -- Anthony Newley chose to spell his protagonist's name with e before i, as "Heironymus."  (For evidence, see the film's poster).
I have changed the spelling throughout this article to the correct spelling; but the title of the article should change as well.  This probably means creating a new page with the correctly spelled title, and a redirect from the misspelled title (which has links to other articles).
The above note by 216.156.138.2 dates from 21 July 2010.
:As noted above, the film poster does use the "Hei" spelling.
:"Hei" is confirmed by Roger Ebert's review and by the first edition of Leslie Halliwell's Film Guide.
:
:Varlaam (talk) 17:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of title 

message: The IMDb currently gives it as "Heironymous"  with an extra 'o'. Both English and French WP had duplicated this.
Presumably this is just a simple error. The name is a Latin version of Jerome and so should have the ending "us", generally speaking.
Varlaam (talk) 18:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main character's given name 

message: Surprising that the film is described as a commercial failure when it made 4 times its budget in US and Canada alone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.48.101.31 (talk) 21:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial failure 

message: beg to differ, but antony newleys kids were tara and sacha, sacha was never called alexander
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5118455/Joan-Collinss-son-father-paedophile.html
5.67.141.97 (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  children
Talk:Deventer

message: Was Deventer the first Dutch city to gain city rights?  If so this is worth a mention.--Deville (Talk) 20:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not for sure if Deventer was the first city to gain city rights. Many documents from that time are lost. It is for sure that Deventer is in the first 5 cities to gain city rights, but much debate has been going on if Deventer was the first or not. As for now, do not mention it yet. Schalkcity (talk) 09:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  City rights
Talk:Kernville, Oregon

message: I sorted out what I could about the location of Kernville, but I'm still a little unclear on whether I got it right. It seems the town moved twice, once across the river, then down the river upon completion of U.S. 101, from north to south to north again (judging by the map). A little original research and a trip to the local history museum might be in order. Also, are there still houses in the "new" Kernville? Any help, especially some other print sources, would be excellent. Thanks! Katr67 22:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Location, location, location

message: Hey, I live near it. It's not a ghost town. Who ever said it, does not know what they are talking about. Take it off.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumpacliff2 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First, please read about civility. The term ghost town is not designed to offend people. Did you read the definition of ghost town? It is not just for places with no people but places that have had a great reduction in population. Besides, it was the "old" part of Kernville that is considered a ghost town. Please read the article carefully and if you have any cited information about the town from reliable sources that isn't original research, please add it to the article. Thanks! Katr67 14:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a ghost town
Talk:Havalina

message: Seeing as Havalina's lineup tended to change with nearly every album, it might be best to put a big list with every member, ever, on this page, and then for each album page also list the band's lineup on that particular album (as well as guest musicians).
What's the source for saying Tatiana Simonian played Farfisa and sang on the first album? I have a copy of Havalina Rail Co. (album), and its liner notes don't list Tatiana as a band member or a guest musician. And I can't hear any farfisa on the album itself, for that matter.Metaphoragizery (talk) 18:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Band lineup

message: Their sound bares no resemblance to post-rock, Animal Collective, and Arcade Fire, and did certainly not influence the two. I'm deleting that line.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.187.171 (talk) 05:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-rock? Animal Collective?

message: I removed the reference to Springsteen's new song/album because this is the wrong band with "Havalina" in the name.  These folks have nothing to do with the song "High Hopes." 173.219.185.130 (talk) 21:53, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Springsteen
Talk:Araki Mataemon

message: It seems highly unlikely that Araki is among the most famous swordmen if I've never heard of him; not impossible, just unlikely, considering the research I've done into the origins of the Yagyū Shinkage-ryū and members of the Yagyū family. It is also spurious that he established the school, since he's not a member of the family that established it. If another editor can verify any or all of the facts presented here, I ask you to please rewrite it in a sensical and grammatical fashion. Thank you. LordAmeth 10:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Diane Skoss "Koryu Bujutsu" book, Araki Mataemon was a student of Yagyu Munenori of Yagyu Shinkage-ryu and was "granted permission to use the Yagyu name in his own school's name by Yagyu Jubei". I can clean this article and add what I found in the Koryu bujutsu book if anyone doesn't have any objections. Fred26 13:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up Tags 

message: I removed the section of the text where it says: "Mataemon's style of fighting mainly based around the ability to sense the inner thoughts of the opponent through your senses (in which the term 'Shingan' truly meant the "mind's-eye"). Through Mataemon's way of fighting, the Yagyu shinkage ryu fighting style was supported in its birth. One battle that Mataemon took place in was against the kusari-gama wielder, Yamada Shinryukan. Throughout the course of this duel, Mataemon lured Shinryukan into a bamboo groove, in which he affectively slew him." 
I checked the user who made that entry (Darin Fidika) and he's actually been "blocked indefinitely". Anyways, I couldnt find a good way to revert the text to a encyclopedia (neutral) viewpoint and I have no sources for the above claims (which was added by Darin Fidika) so I decided to delete it until such time someone else can fill in the blanks. Fred26 11:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed a section 

message: Fred26 wrote: "Hello. I noticed you changed the status of Araki Mataemon from "founder" of Yagyu Shingan-ryu to "promoter". I was personally under impression he created the Shingan-ryu, and so does the authors of Koryu.com. (authors of the book I used for reference. I'm not an expert on Shingan-ryu though, I might have missed some vital fact. Was Araki Mataemon the actual creator of Shingan-ryu or not according to you? Best regards" --Fred26 11:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Promoter" instead of founder of Yagyu Shingan-ryu? 

message: The Japanese Wikipedia article 荒木又右衛門 (Araki Mataemon) has Araki Mataemon's dates as 1599 - 5 October 1638 (28 August 1638 O.S.).  This article currently has (1584-1637). Official site of Yagyū Shingan-ryū Taijutsu (Edo-line) has 1594-1634. --Bejnar 19:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth and death dates
Talk:Arima Haruzumi

message: Stubby, and stylistic problems, just like far too many other articles on Sengoku samurai. Don't get me wrong, I'm happy these articles exist, and to whichever editor is reading this and taking this personally, please don't. I have nothing against you personally - I am simply trying to help get the quality & breadth of Japanese coverage on Wikipedia to a higher level, and I can't do it alone. In any case, you can start with the introduction. It begins with "Arima Haruzumi. Japanese feudal lord in the Sengoku era." Neither of those are sentences. Add a verb, "to be", and it becomes a beautiful introductory sentence: "Arima Haruzumi was a Japanese feudal lord in the Sengoku era." It's all about the small stylistic changes. LordAmeth 22:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:MILHIST Assessment
Talk:Ashikaga Yoshiaki

message: Is that correct? 32.132.12.210 (talk) 03:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this was a spelling mistake. It was supposed to say "Yoshiteru"; Yoshiharu merely died in exile. Yoshiteru was forced to commit suicide. Applodion (talk) 09:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Wikipedia page says that Yoshiharu was killed.
Talk:Ashikaga Yoshimochi

message: The following was temporarily removed from the text because it lacks the verifiable support of an in-line citation.  Without more, this could be merely spurious: 
* He took as beloved Akamatsu Mochisada, to whom he granted lands which Mochisada mismanaged. His own family denounced him, and he had to commit seppuku by order of his lover, the shogun.
The bare statements, standing alone, are inadequate without more -- without some sort of better developed context and possible internal links to other articles in Wikipedia ...? --Tenmei (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Akamatsu Mochisada
Talk:Karapinar

message: Macar araştırmacı Dr. İspay Ferenc.
Ve ilk önce İzmit/Gebze’ye neden sonra Antalya’nın Serik ilçesinin Gebiz nahiyesine
yerleştiler.Günümüzde Karapınar,Yunuslar ve Kahyalar gibi mahallelerde ikamet
ediyorlar.Seracılık yapıyor,pamuk,susam,zeytin,buğday ve arpa yetiştiriyorlar.
According to (a few) Turkish sources, citing Dr. Ispay Ferenc all the same, the Hungarians in question would have at first settled in Gebze, near İstanbul, and in the 1830's, for fear of being reclaimed by the Russian forces who had landed and remained for a brief period in the Bosphorus (very close to Gebze), at a moment of alliance with the Ottoman Empire -against Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt-, they were reportedly made to settle in the locality of present-day Gebiz (that they named after their previous town of residence, thence Gebiz=Gebze). Their descendants would be the inhabitants of the quarters named Karapınar (the title of this article), Yunuslar and Kahyalar, in Gebiz. Therefore, Karapinar is simply one of the quarters of the town. Perhaps we can name the article into something like, (possible) "Hungarian descendants of Gebiz". Cretanforever 20:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, very interesting, thanks. So Karapınar = Karapinar? I thought the village was at the seaside. If you are correct, we can simply merge the contents of this article into the Karapınar page. Another suggestion is that we start an article called Hungarians in Turkey. Please let me know what you think. —Khoikhoi 05:36, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

text: So I guess we can either move this article to Gebiz, or create it. —Khoikhoi 18:19, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Alright. My only concern, however, is that Karapınar and Gebiz are not the same town, and therefore a redirect would be inappropriate. Perhaps we could redirect it to Hungarians in Turkey instead (for now). Then of course you can still create the Gebiz article. İyi geceler! :-) —Khoikhoi 01:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Or perhaps as Hungarian as the Magyarab. :-) I'll ask some people as well. —Khoikhoi 17:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

text: You're welcome! :-) Thanks for the info (to both Kissl & Cretanforever), I hope that we hear back from them as well. Ciao, Khoikhoi 03:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jockeys' Guild

message: Strikes, attempted strikes, the Gertmenian ouster and embezzlement charges . All missing. See, e.g., links at . Andyvphil (talk) 11:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Congressional inquiry, etc.

message: The current list is incomplete. The Jockey's((sic)) Guild website has additional names which I will add. T.E. Goodwin (talk) 08:33, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete List of Founding Members
Talk:Chujiro Hayashi

message: He is a graduate of Naval Academy (the directory has his name).
What is evidence of naval physician?Kadzuwo (talk) 12:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naval Physician? 

message: I have not seen any prove for the seppuku theory. It is written in several books though that Chujiro Hayashi has committed suicide. (e.g. Frank Arjava Petter, This is Reiki) SamuraiLatino (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seppuku?
Talk:Daisuke Ishiwatari

message: Is Daisuke in a relationship with Mori Toshimichi? Some Japanese magazines seem to suggest they're a couple. 188.39.86.173 (talk) 14:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship Status

message: I heard Daisuke was involved with SNKs weapon based fighting game The Last Blade in the past. Is this true?5.150.244.20 (talk) 09:55, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Blade

message: toco toco's "game guest" series has one with Daisuke Ishiwatari, can be good for future references. Here is the video.37.3.158.86 (talk) 12:57, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  toco toco video interview
Talk:Feature (linguistics)

message: This article should be added to the Feature (disambiguation) page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 143.229.1.42 (talk) 21:05, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I added a short definition there. Indeterminate (talk) 04:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page 

message: I tried to flesh out the article a bit. We could use a clear definition at the top (maybe I'll use mine from Feature if nobody has a better one). The Semantics section still could use more information. Also, it would be nice if we could get some history on the concept (which of these meanings came first? who coined the term? etc.). Feel free to add stuff, people! :) Finally, I don't think my examples are ideal. If anyone thinks of better ones, just change them. Indeterminate (talk) 04:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Typed Feature Structures are central in HPSG, and I believe a similar conceptualization in used in LFG.  Also, the MP literature discusses features extensively.  I may come back and add some discussion of these topics if no one else objects. This would go in 'in morphology' section (which I'd like to change to 'in morphosyntax').J Crow (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff to Add
Talk:Soil innoculant

message: This article should be renamed "Soil inoculant". All dictionaries that I have consulted spell it that way. I am a new editor and do not know how to do this. Should I create a new article "Soil inoculant" and copy this content to it? If so, should "Soil innoculant" be nominated for deletion? Or is there a way to simply rename the URL?
I would like to link to this article but will wait until the spelling issue is resolved. Peter Chastain 22:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tony Terry

message: Wikipedia rules state all articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly and without bias all significant views.  This article is clearly biased and not neutral.  It should be rewritten. Afrolocks 00:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The comments above were vaild - but the article has been sub edited to a far better Wiki standard as of February 2009. However, more references / input would be welcomed.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Present status
Talk:Emperor Ankō

message: The Imperial mon (emblem) was added in the Notes section in 2010.  In 2012, the image was removed from this and other articles about Japanese emperors -- compare here. Zenwort's edit summary is clear and reasonable --img of Imperial seal removed, this was not used before the Muromachi era 
The use of this symbol is justified because this article is an important part of a grouping of articles about the emperors of Japan -- see Imperial Household Agency (Kunaichō):  安康天皇 (20).  Does this rationale provide a good enough reason for it to be restored? --Enkyo2 (talk) 19:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Enkyo, please keep this discussion in one place. I already replied to you here. All of these articles already have the image embedded, so we don't need a second. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 05:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of Imperial symbol
Talk:Forsyth, Georgia

message: If you would like to know why I assessed the article the way I have, please use my talk page. Ethan (talk) 16:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: Does Forstyh have a sister city? 174.215.151.72 (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Forsyth have a sister city?
Talk:Justice for Janitors

message: Hi! First time ever using the Talk function, and not sure how it works, so please forgive me! But the first citation on the page, after "SEIU retains constructive partnerships with the corporations employing the janitors to ensure that these corporations receive no negative impact due to the campaigns," does not say that! I feel it unfairly characterizes the campaign. 2600:4040:9C4B:B400:3810:8A7E:86DD:C684 (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor sourcing
Talk:Emperor Hanzei

message: The Imperial  mon (emblem) was added in the Notes section in 2010.  In 2012, the image was removed from this and other articles about Japanese emperors -- compare here. Zenwort's edit summary is clear and reasonable --img of Imperial seal removed, this was not used before the Muromachi era 
The use of this symbol is justified because this article is an important part of a grouping of articles about the emperors of Japan -- see Imperial Household Agency (Kunaichō):  反正天皇 (18).  Does this rationale provide a good enough reason for it to be restored? --Enkyo2 (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of Imperial symbol
Talk:Emperor Junna

message: Article states
: Following [Junna's] death, Fujiwara Yoshifusa maneuvered to have Montoku, rather than the crown prince Tsunesada, put on the throne; Junna's death set the stage for the Fujiwara clan's ascendancy.
But that completely skips the ten years of Ninmyō's reign that followed first, so without further context the statement makes little sense. -- 188.192.196.184 (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fujiwara/Montoku: What about Ninmyō?
Talk:Emperor Keikō

message: The Imperial  mon (emblem) was added in the Notes section in 2010.  In 2012, the image was removed from this and other articles about Japanese emperors -- compare here. Zenwort's edit summary is clear and reasonable --img of Imperial seal removed, this was not used before the Muromachi era 
The use of this symbol is justified because this emperor and this article is an important part of a grouping of articles about the emperors of Japan -- see Imperial Household Agency (Kunaichō):  景行天皇 (12).  Does this rationale provide a good enough reason for it to be restored? --Enkyo2 (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of Imperial symbol
Talk:Emperor Kenzō

message: The following two tidbits need clearer citation:
*Kenzō, formerly known as Prince Woke, was the younger brother of Prince Oke (Oyoke, Ohoke).  The siblings were said to be found when Seinei died without heirs.
 
*The brothers were to ascend the throne as adopted heirs of Seinei; however, it remains unclear whether they had been "found" in Seinei's lifetime or only afterwards. Woke ascended before his elder brother, in accordance with an agreement made by the two brothers. 
This material can be restored to the article in due course. --Tenmei (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more work
Talk:Emperor Kōan

message: The Imperial mon (emblem) was added in the Notes section in 2010.  In 2012, the image was removed from this and other articles about Japanese emperors -- compare here. Zenwort's edit summary is clear and reasonable --img of Imperial seal removed, this was not used before the Muromachi era 
The use of this symbol is justified because this article is an important part of a grouping of articles about the emperors of Japan -- see Imperial Household Agency (Kunaichō):  孝安天皇 (06).  Does this rationale provide a good enough reason for it to be restored? --Enkyo2 (talk) 16:24, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of Imperial symbol
Talk:Emperor Montoku

message: In the Kugyō section:
 ..................................................... lifetime, 804-872
 ........ time in office (857-872)
 .......... Daijō-daijin (857-872) Fujiwara Yoshifusa　(藤原良房), 804-872
* Daijō-daijin, Fujiwara Yoshifusa　(藤原良房), 857-872
* Sadaijin, Minamoto Tokiwa　(源常), 844-854
* Sadaijin, Minamoto Makoto　(源信), 857-868
* Udaijin, Fujiwara Yoshifusa　(藤原良房), 848-857
* Udaijin, Fujiwara Yoshisuke　(藤原良相), 857-867
In the intial edit, I intended to present the dates during which someone held a specific court title, but that now seems too ambitious for a start-level article.  The intention had been to explain the sequence of serial officeholders with these dates.  
Instead, it's probably better to simply list the birth/death dates.  Arguably, it might be possible (or even preferable) to include both sets of dates as the information becomes available ...? --Ooperhoofd 17:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How better to present these dates?