lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hauxton

message: This article could do with some mention of the church which I believe dates back to the 14th century, and has some interesting early murals.  Hauxton has also been in the local news recently due to the proposed siting of a waste recycling centre nearby Feucht 16:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dunstable Grammar School

message: two international alumni and a PM.... but the schools wiki page is a stub.... come on! Victuallers 22:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: You have GOT to be joking! How much more niche a category can you get? It amounts to 7 educational establishmetns in the whole world with no other connection?
Informed Owl (talk) 11:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be a reason to remove :Category:Educational institutions disestablished in 1971, but not :Category:1971 disestablishments, which is much more populated. I have added back the latter. – ukexpat (talk) 17:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact on rethinking this, I am not sure that it is a valid reason to remove even the former - there are many categories that have only a few, unrelated, articles but are nonetheless valid. I have replaced my re-addition of the latter by adding back the former. – ukexpat (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1971 disestablisment?
Talk:The Rathskeller

message: Articles on the Remains have them - and presumably other bands - playing at the Rathskeller as early as 1964. Wha...? Huh...??Tomseattle (talk) 10:52, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 60's Rat?

message: Thanks for this article, and especially the list of Notable Acts. Any chance of including the dates? Rosekelleher (talk) 16:07, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Rat is surely the mother of Boston rock venues, but I don't think it can be called the "granddaddy." That title surely goes to The Boston Tea Party (concert venue). I'm not making any edits yet. Just putting this up for discussion.
While we're at it, maybe smart to develop the Kenmore Square article. It's significant that Storyville (nightclub), the famed jazz venue, went rock during The Rat's most vibrant periods in the early 80s. It could be helpful to researchers if we flesh out the Kenmore rock scene. I could move this discussion to the Kenmore Square article. 
Musikeditor (talk) 07:01, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Related venues

message: I'm going to follow Wikipedia protocol and post on the talk page before I make any major changes, but this article is in terrible need of an overhaul.  I may create a separate page for the bands and leave only the truly notable in the main article.   (Please note that I'm deliberately not posting on the Rat Facebook page because it's impossible to get consensus.  If people care about the Wikipedia article, they'll offer their opinions here.  JSFarman (talk) 00:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is an embarrassment 

message: There are a few different books with that title. Do you mean 
this one?
If so, I suggest adding a link.
Actually from the description it sounds like the other book might be more relevant?
Rosekelleher (talk) 19:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Souls 

message: In March 1979 Columbia Recording Artists ANDROMEDA headlined a week long benefit concert for WBCN...it raised enough finance to secure BCN's future...bravo muso's & Boston!!!     2600:4040:974D:8000:91B3:22F4:D755:2DD8 (talk) 20:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANDROMEDA helps WBCN!!! 

message: Maybe we could add that the name is German and means literally "Town hall cellar" - common name in German for restaurants or pubs near the town hall. 91.64.168.69 (talk) 04:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:The Kindly Ones (Powell novel)

message: The article says "Adapted in part from material published by the Anthony Powell Society with consent". But where is the consent verified? Is the content licensed under a Creative Commons licence? cagliost (talk) 08:36, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Anthony Powell Society 

message: There is a potential copy-vio between the second paragraph and one of the comments from https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1376772.The_Kindly_Ones .  However, the Goodreads comment was posted in 2016 and the Wikipedia content was added in 2006 alongside the actual copyright violating material.  It is most likely that the Goodreads post drew on Wikipedia rather than the other way around.  A current version copyvio test → https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=The+Kindly+Ones+%28Powell+novel%29&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 ... shows this hit as an 83% potential copyvio, but I believe this to be a false-positive.  Note that then 2006 version of the wikipedia has been redacted as part of handling the actual copyright violation. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:54, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goodreads comment vs. this article
Talk:1949 Ford

message: A couple of issues with this article, which seems to be very well done:
* I thought I read somewhere that the Ford-O-Matic transmission — the first automatic in the Ford lines — was first offered in 1951. This can easily be verified and upon this, should be added to the article. Note, too, that the other "low-priced three" marque — the Plymouth — didn't have its automatic until early 1954.
* Shouldn't we use a photo of a fully factory stock Ford in the infobox, in place of the customized model there? I agree that the 1949-1951 models are/were often customized, but the article is about the car as it originally came from the factory. I'm sure there is a place somewhere in the article where it can be stated that the car is frequently customized, however.
Other than that, perhaps a bit of an expansion on the Crestliner model (i.e., what set it apart from "regular" Fords and made it a more premium model) and there we go.
Thanks for the opportunity to provide comment on this article and ways it can be improved. [[Briguy52748 17:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A couple of things with this article
Talk:Des Moines Buccaneers

message: I love them i went to a game against kearney nebraska's tri-city storm the other day and they lost 5-2 but i still cheer for them from colorado.. Good luck to them Dec. 14 against Tri-city again..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by HighschoolEmo (talk • contribs) 21:26, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Division Des Moines Buccaneers..
Talk:Some Time Never: A Fable for Supermen

message: Just pretend this book does not exist.
: Well, despite Dahl disowning the work, there have been worse books. It would also be interesting to know why Dahl and/or his British editors rewrote the final chapter. On pp. 252-253 of the UK edition a "most unusual Gremlin" explains that the gremlins are vanishing because "We are a most improbable people ... we haven't really existed very much, have we?" These lines don't appear in the US edition. I've never seen an explanation from Dahl's biographers as to why the US and UK versions differ in this regard. Muzilon (talk) 18:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Put this page out of its misery

message: The page's title is Sometime Never, yet on the page itself (and, apparently, the cover), it's spelled Some Time Never. Could we align both spellings? --90.7.216.132 (talk) 14:00, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I have (somewhat boldly) moved the page to Some Time Never: A Fable for Supermen, which is what the first edition was called.--Muzilon (talk) 14:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Title Spelling?
Talk:A Quiver Full of Arrows

message: These descriptions need quite a bit more rephrasing and copyediting cleanup, and some may want to be weeded.  They read more like a book report than an encyclopedia.  There are several places where the summaries refer to the "author" or the "writer".  Should that be "narrator"? SarahTheEntwife (talk) 16:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sun Peaks Resort

message: Reworded the following:
"The ski resort is being constructed on unceded Secwepemc First Nation ("Shuswap") land as a part of historical colonialism against Canadian indigenous peoples by European colonists. The land is part of ongoing land claims settlement negotiations between the Canadian First Nations in British Columbia and the governments of British Columbia and Canada."
to remove apparent political bias in the statement. Replaced with:
"Portions of the ski resort are being constructed on unceded/disputed Secwepemc First Nation ("Shuswap") land. The lands in question are part of ongoing land claims settlement negotiations between the Canadian First Nations in British Columbia and the governments of British Columbia and Canada."
-TheDrew 17:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The latter paragraph above has been re-instated, apparently after being removed by p.r. people associated with the resort, so I have re-instated it as notable.  Earlier versions of this article covered the background to the dispute in too much detail and a huge chunk was removed by User:Shell Kinney for "apparent lack of references".  Actually much that was there was cited and links had been interspersed without being properly line-cited - in this edit a number of them are still in the text, though their topic matter ranges far from the land claims protest connected with the resort so I have not even contemplated restoring them.  And while the re-instated paragraph (slightly modified) is currently uncited, it's a truism and easy to cite; another sentence could comment on the blockade of the site and associated events.  And to resort/p.r. staff reading this, you do not "own" this article so please do not delete material again that has validity; integrate and edit, not delete, is a wikipedia maxim.  Likewise please do not build another linkfarm of resort accommodations and businesses; WP:Wikipedia is not a directory.Skookum1 (talk) 15:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV removal of land claims mention

message: I wonder that nothing is written about that the resort is located in the Neskonlith Douglas Reserve and that there were several disputs with the native americans about the development of the area. I just read an related article from 2008 (http://www.datum.at/artikel/der-ski-des-manitu - in German) - anybody of you who knows more about that and could add it to the article?
--Cafe1819 (talk) 11:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neskonlith Douglas Reserve
Talk:A Twist in the Tale (short story collection)

message: In my paperback edition, the story "Christina Rosenthal" is the last one. For this reason, I will shortly move its plot to the respective position — unless someone can tell me that in other editions, the chapters are arranged in different orders. Jochen64 (talk) 05:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of chapters 

message: The description of the story "A Chapter of Accidents", as it is now, is referenced by a certain supersummary.com. On that website, however, most of the stories of "A Twist in the Tale" are not summarized accurately. As an example, the summary of "The Steal" reads "… is about two teachers, a married couple, who travel abroad every year. However, it’s never an ordinary holiday, and they always steal something to keep as a memento" – which is simply wrong. For the real content, read the summary on this page, or Mr Archer's story itself. Having read "A Twist in the Tale" several times myself, I advise against relying on supersummary.com – or at least on their summary of this book.
Moreover, the present summary on this page does not seem to represent the real content of the printed story. I therefore suggest and intend to rephrase the summary of "A Chapter of Accidents", summarizing the book itself and not relying on faulty secondary literature. Unless, of course, the original contributor  wishes to correct himself.
I'll be back… —Jochen64 (talk) 23:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A summary to be improved
Talk:South Schleswig Voters' Association

message: As primarily a minority party for the Danish minority the Danish name is the primary one. They represent "National Frisians" as well, but that is a minor part of their coalition. Danish, Frisian (and Low German) were recognized as official languages of S-H in May, so if that is the argument for putting under the majority language, that is no longer valid. The Swedish People's Party article uses the Swedish name as the primary and the Finnish as the secondary and would be an apt comparison.--Batmacumba (talk) 22:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Danish name is the primary name 
Talk:Xichang Satellite Launch Center

message: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=28.196944,102.071389&ie=UTF8&z=13&ll=28.195657,102.078609&spn=0.111805,0.21698&t=h&om=1
The map is censored? Its blacked out? o.o -- Frap 17:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be.--agr 18:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Works just fine for me as of today, 5 September 2007. - Ageekgal 07:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google maps 

message: :Regarding the template  used on this page, please join the discussion at Template talk:Spaceport#Shorter names.
:(sdsds - talk) 23:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shorter names in Spaceport template 
Talk:Frog and Wombat

message: My summary should have said 'POV content', not NPOV content. Apologies. Gusworld (talk) 10:18, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last edit 

message: i have never seen or heard of this movie before, but apparently Lindsay Wagner played Sydney Parker.
--71.121.143.50 (talk) 07:18, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lindsay Wagner
Talk:Omega Centauri

message: Apparent magnitude is given as +3.9 in the list of globular clusters but only +5.33 here. Which is it? --IanOsgood 17:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brightness 

message: The size was just written at 1.6 exameter (EM), a unit which is not customary. Maybe light-years or parsecs would be better? CielProfond (talk) 14:43, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Gaia/New_Gaia_release_reveals_rare_lenses_cluster_cores_and_unforeseen_science Mtrova (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Gaia image of Omega Centauri
Talk:Jeff Robbins

message: Just saw that an earlier version of the page was deleted as non-noteworthy. Thought the connections with GNN, various artist/musicians, and the conversion from 'Commercializing the web' to 'OSS evangelist' was a interesting aspect to the bio. If there are still disputes, apologies for recreating.Jeffeaton 17:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The list of more noteworthy personalities than this one would fill up a few Wiki servers I expect.Landroo 06:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noteworthy?
Talk:Oakwood, London

message: The Park is a council amenity, so trees bought for it are bought by the council. The trees originally lining the path on the north side of the Park were Lombardy Poplars, of which few now remain. My house backs onto the path.... 94.194.19.203 (talk) 11:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oakwood Park trees
Talk:Archaeological tourism

message: This was a bit of a mess. Still looked like a bad translation job. Clearly most of the text was taken from a commercial archaeological tourism website...most likely one of the ones linked to at the bottom. I've removed all the marketing jargon and the links to commercial sites. I've made the information clear and accurate and marked the whole thing as an archaeology stub. It is an interesting topic with a lot of solid academic referencing but I don't have the time to work it up. Hopefully someone else will!
Radiotik 07:58, 07 July 2010
This looked like a bad machine translation.  Might be from the Spanish wikipedia.  I chopped a lot to get it into soemthing that was beginning to sound like English. RJFJR 17:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Hello page watchers! I added a template over the section heading I added called "Impact" - I read the tone as quite negatively biased, so perhaps it needs a bit of attention. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Battle of the Bulge order of battle

message: I don't think the AI battalions listed for the 4th AD are correct. The 9th, 50th, and 53rd were organic to the division, but I can't find any evidence that the 9th or 40th were attached during this campaign. Kriegaffe 15:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article includes the 502nd SS Heavy tank battalion as a subordinate to the II SS Panzer corps while in fact it was'nt , after the retreat from the Normandy which cause the loss of all Tiger I tanks , the battalion started to receive Tiger II tanks but Dec. 27th ( 11 days ) after the battle started the battalion had only 6 tanks delivered but even those were transfered to the 503rd SS heavy tank battalion , and even on Feb. 14th the battalion had 31 tanks and later deployed to the eastern front.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.8.246.12 (talk) 11:11, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  502nd SS Heavy tank battalion 

message: I think what I've done here increases readability. Also, I moved the Germans up front since they had the initiative, and added some photos. Hungrydog55 (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformat
File talk:Fpsengine.jpg

message: The picture says that Doom 3 derieves from original Doom engine. It's rather the successor of Quake3 engine. Also the small letters are almost unreadable.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.23.188.17 (talk • contribs).
The Engines of Quake 1 and 2 are retroactively referred to as "id Tech 1" and "id Tech 2" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Id_Tech), while Doom 3 definitely has a connection to the "Quake Engines" (also referred to as "id Tech 4"). The Call of Duty 2 Engine (called IW Engine 2.0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine) is also based of idTech 3. The "Battlefield 2 Engine" is called "Refractor 2" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractor_Engine). "Frostbite" and many others are missing. Is this a diagram about engines or about games? The categorization has no source whatsoever and some of the mentioned engines do not even fit the given description. I would recommend removing this diagram completely as it is extremely inaccurate and incomplete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.91.201.76 (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Red Bank

message: It has been suggested that the Red Bank Battlefield article should be merged into this article. They cover the same topic, with only a few different pieces of information that could easily be merged. Truthanado (talk) 02:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  One is about the battle specifically, the other is about the historical site and current use.  However, far be it for me to stop you.  Be bold. dm (talk) 03:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I disagree, too. Antietam, for instance, has separate entries for the battlefield and the battle. The battlefield article could be expanded some, though. --Milkbreath (talk) 10:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree it's just a stub now, but I suspect if we move some of the current day details from the battle article into the battelfield article,  it will improve both. dm (talk) 13:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Glad it worked out amicably.  More importantly, because you noticed the two articles, I've shuffled text around with both of them being better for it:  the battle is more concise while the battlefield is fleshed out.  Thanks! dm (talk) 00:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: This source: http://www.ageofnelson.org/MichaelPhillips/info.php?ref=0252 indicates that the Augusta burned accidentally, as does the article on said vessel. The current draft of this article suggests it was intentionally fired by the Americans. I assume there is authority for the latter proposition? -- But|seriously|folks  05:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article on the ship itself lists four possible causes for the fire.  I have not gone into the sources there but this article should be fixed. MB 02:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMS Augusta
Talk:Langepas

message: that's like the cutest coat of arms i've ever seen.  i'd imagine it wouldn't give much of a psychological advantage against the enemy during wars. -Taco325i 17:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He he. No need to use it in wartime since this town was established in 1980s :). - Darwinek 18:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of arms
Talk:Backford

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 02:31, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Adam Rainer

message: Because you just might get it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Morria (talk • contribs) 23:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be Careful What you Wish For 

message: hey can someone please undo some info here h=and write it in in their own words cause i read a webstite and its exactly the same on wikipedia. Thanks, 91.72.137.82 (talk) 12:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  copy alert 

message: some of the links seem to be to a spam site--Robert Treat (talk) 03:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  check links