lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ctenosaura similis

message: If you convert 10 m/s or 35 km/h, you get 21.7 mph. Have we been demetricated? Lightmouse (talk) 07:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just quoting the source directly.  Although I am in favor of demetrification!--Mike Searson (talk) 08:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Corrected conversion assuming 21.7 mph was correct. I saw another reference that quoted 21.5 mph as the top speed. DGERobertson (talk) 20:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed of 21.7 mph sounds like a conversion from metric raw data 

message: Disclaimer: Please excuse my lack of expertise in editing. Most of my previous edits have been for grammar or clarity, so I will not make the change to the actual page. 
This claim is undocumented and unfounded. Please refer to ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/nonfao/lead/x6197e/x6197e02b.pdf for information about sustainability of hunting this species.Lisapaloma (talk) 04:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the claim is more or less correct because the IUCN assessment from 2015 makes a similar claim. The document you are referring to is from 1995 and refers to Ctenosaura in general, not this particular species. I think the needed fix is to add citation to IUCN and maybe adjust the phrasing. Micromesistius (talk) 06:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim that ″Although it is heavily hunted it does not appear to be endangered in any of its native territory.″ is unfounded
Talk:HMS Mary (1660)

message: Just as a comment, the Wessex Archaeology report refers to her as a fourth-rate rather than a third-rate. Their report has much more detail on the site of the wreck, even if they didn't do much on the South Mound. 81.109.183.49 (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating?
Talk:Single carriageway

message: Would undivided highway be a better article title with single carriageway in brackets rather than the other way round? I suggest it would be good to standardise on American English for the core road terms. Undivided highway is also the more common term on the web according to Google. Here are other road related terms (American English term first, then British and a wlink on the relevant entry):
*Undivided highway/single carriageway
*Divided highway/dual carriageway
*Roadway/carriageway
*Median/central reservation.
*Tree lawn/Road verge
*Sidewalk/footway etc
As you can see there is currently a lack of consistency across the articles which is confusing.
Any thoughts
- PeterEastern (talk) 17:27, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The British scheme is far more widespread across articles and should generally be retained unless it can be shown that the American term is in use internationally (and the British not). Certain articles need to be reworked and merged, as we have far too many articles to cover different types of roads (when a single article on "road" could cover everything in detail). - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 20:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tree lawn isn't used at all in the UK. Not only is the term unknown, but British suburbs simply aren't laid out like this. --Ef80 (talk) 13:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The USA and UK terms for verge were indeed reversed on this talk page. I have also fixed the order. The 'Tree Lawn' article has also been renamed Road verge which I have fixed and another minor issue above. PeterEastern (talk) 04:58, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to 'undivided highway'? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was:  Snow close, not moved.  Imzadi 1979 →  23:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Single carriageway →  – Use American terms 2600:1700:6180:6290:9DF4:436E:5E7F:66B (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move
Talk:Katamine

message: This article was deleted over a year ago - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katamine.
I believe that the subject is notable, so i decided to be bold and restore it. I shall promptly add sources to prove notability and remove peacock terms. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undeletion 

message: Is it really a stub? It's quite complete and sourced. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 20:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub
Talk:Pancho Coimbre

message: I'm nominating this after undergoing a complete copy-edit by Tony the Marine, reviewers please note that this article is being sourced by a book that was published by El Día a newspaper that preceeded El Nuevo Día, so the book should pass WP:RS without problem, it may be used quite often but finding further references proved to be quite a massive challenge, especially online, since this man lived, played and died before the internet was widespread. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article nomination
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jeff Rosenbaum (2nd nomination)

message: KEEP:   In terms of the neopagan community, Mr. Rosenbaum is a promoter on the level of Bill Graham.  My friends have been attending the events he promoted for over 20 years. His work has been notable in shaping the consciousness of at least 2 generations of neopagans. Oskar Matz. (talk) 21:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey Rosey, please do move your comment to the page, your opinion is very welcome, it's just if you were to 'vote' for your own article, it would be a bit tragic, but if you actually want the article deleted, wiki often goes with the subject's wish.  And happy new year! :) Merkinsmum 20:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jeff, what are you doing? Everyone already knows Rosencomet/Rosenbaum (you) are the same person. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 23:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:United Kingdom driving test

message: Some points raised in the separate article Show me, tell me might be merged into the appropriate section of this article. Kpjas (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show Me, Tell Me 

message: Shouldn't this be renamed to Great Britain driving test? The Northern Ireland test is administered by a different DVLA (there are two in the UK, GB and NI), and varies slightly. Canterbury Tail talk 12:46, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, as far as I know the Northern Ireland test history is different to the Great Britain driving test, I think a test in N.I. was not introduced until 1956. 2A00:23C8:2297:AF01:C5EE:2B1D:922A:3979 (talk) 09:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The section "Theory test" under "The current test" is pretty poor, it's not listed in the contents, the grammar is bad and the reference doesn't back up all of the claims made. Someone care to clean it up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.183.34 (talk) 10:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theory test section 

message: I have added a scan of the Driving Test Report as issued in 2011. The box for the rear of the report has been removed. The image is placed under Crown Copyright.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ofahcuts (talk • contribs) 16:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driving Test Report 

message: This article should reflect the change of the DSA to the DVSA in April 2014.https://www.gov.uk/government/news/driver-and-vehicle-standards-agency-named Madeinsane (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  DSA now DVSA
Talk:Chris Young (disambiguation)

message: I am absoultely in LOVE with Chris Young..... he drop dead GEORGOUS & his voice is AMAZING!!! MWAH thank you fo doing what you do to help me enjoy listening to the radio..... keep'em coming!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.156.67 (talk) 17:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  all about Chris Young!!!! 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Chris Young (singer) - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Jim Higgins

message: Jimmie Higgins was also the name of a fictional Character created by Upton Sinclair. Sinclair named a novel published in 1919 after this disciplined and a little naive grass-roots activist, and Jimmie Higgins became a proverbial synonym for the (now defunct) type of the "true believer" among the rank and file of leftist movements. Robert Schediwy 
P.S.:See Aileen S. Kraditor: "Jimmy Higgins": The Mental World of the American Rank-And-File Communist, 1930-1958 (Contributions in Political Science) Greenwood Press 1988. ("This study fills a conspicuous gap in the secondary literature on the Communist Party by examining the mental world of the wholly committed rank-and-file Party member".--91.129.8.56 (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Beretta Stampede

message: Was the Colt Peacemaker, popular in the 1860s ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.217.45.98 (talk) 12:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colt Peacemaker 

message: The article is pure publicity for Beretta. Should be deleted hmaag (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publicity 

message: :Too bad there are no dates for these revolvers. More references are needed, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dthomsen8 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates?

message: Please delete this article, it's spam, it reads like a beretta cataloge page 78.94.41.74 (talk) 06:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete 
Talk:Bone pain

message: This was a terribly written article. I've fixed it somewhat, but it still needs a lot of work. Russthomas1515 (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC
I agree.  I've added numerous revisions.  I've removed irrelevant information and attempted to standardize the grammar and tense of the article.  One glaring omission, in my opinion, is a "Prognosis" section.  I do not possess the necessary medical knowledge to complete this section.
Gavteronic (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: Does Bone pain in children warrant its own article or should it be merged into this one? PDCook (talk) 16:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The current information on the children article right now would make a nice add-on to Bone pain article...I would opt for a merge. Renaissancee (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Please explain why you think it should remain as a stand-alone article. Neither article is overly lengthy, and I don't see why the content should be spread over multiple articles. I have seen no indication that bone pain in children is any more notable than bone pain in general. PDCook (talk) 00:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

text: There seems to be consensus for the merge (see also Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#A_couple_of_merge_proposals_folks_might_want_to_disucss. If no one takes action on the merge (or as long as there are no substantive objections), I'll go ahead and do it in a day or two. PDCook (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bone pain in children]]
Talk:Quantifier shift

message: In some metric space (M,d), let B(a,r) be the (metric) ball with center a and radius r.
* Convergence of (x_n)_{n\in\N}\subset M is
:::\exists a\in M\forall \epsilon>0 : x_n\in B(a,\epsilon)\mbox{ for almost all }n
:vs.
:Cauchy-criterion (equivalent to the usual definition):
:::\forall \epsilon>0\exists a\in M : x_n\in B(a,\epsilon)\mbox{ for almost all }n
* Continuity on a set U\subset M vs. uniform continuity on U is the better known example
:::\forall x\in U \forall \epsilon>0\exists\delta>0: f(B(x,\delta))\subset B(f(x),\epsilon)
:vs.
:::\forall \epsilon>0\exists\delta>0\forall x\in U : f(B(x,\delta))\subset B(f(x),\epsilon)
--LutzL (talk) 16:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples from calculus
Talk:International Association for the Study of Pain

message: I was looking at the references used on this page and noticed that all of them come directly from the IASP website, or an affiliated branch. Are there any plans to change these sources to find ones independent from the source material? Kbehling (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of References 

message: the president is Dr. Catherine Bushnell right now Ania.n123 (talk) 13:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs an update
Talk:Michael Hyatt

message: What's her DOB?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.71.143 (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age? 

message: What absolute nonsense this opening paragraph is.  What country?  Or is broadway in Britain?  Is this supposed to be an encyclopedia?! 
"Michael Hyatt is a British-born film and television actress. Before Hyatt's work in film and television, she enjoyed memorable performances on stages throughout the country, particularly in Ragtime on Broadway."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.36.153.134 (talk) 00:19, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense
Talk:The Centre on Barton

message: Is Ottawa St really Hamilton's greatest tourist attraction?24.36.240.95 (talk) 03:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you joking? Hamilton has many attractions. Just to name a few: Jackson Square, Devil's Punch Bowl, Copps Coliseum, Ivor Wynne Stadium, etc - Vhayes1992 18:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Category talk:Recurring events established in 2007

message: How do you know (still in 2007) that events established in 2007 are recurring? Jaraalbe (talk) 22:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are events that have plans to recur and are likely to. Categories "Potentially recurring events established in 2007",  "Events established in 2007 with the intention of recurring", or "Events established in 2007 with a high likelihood of recurrence" seem too awkward. Since it is useful to have these events grouped, keeping the same format is probably best. Quatloo (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I accept your point. However, how many years do we wait to remove those events that have failed to become recurring events? Would the use of a category like :Category:Events established in 2007 solve this problem?  Jaraalbe (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  No matter what, a magic dance must be done annually, and what you are proposing is a considerably more cumbersome dance -- the category would have to be brought up for CFD annually. As opposed to just the current solution, simple recategorizing should any events fail to recur. As the events listed are actually likely to recur, you are addressing a problem that either does not exist or is a negligible issue. Quatloo (talk) 20:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Accepted, as a practical solution, let's wait and see. It was the logic that was concerning me. Jaraalbe (talk) 07:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: When is an event recurring?
Talk:Gouin (electoral district)

message: : The following table shows which Montreal streets run north south and which ones run east west. These are the Montreal conventional and traditional designations and it also shows those streets that already have their own article. Hence Jean-Talon Street runs east west (or vice versa). There exists no Jean Talon Boulevard that runs north south.  See
 Peter Horn 19:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orientation of Montreal streets
Talk:Hochelaga-Maisonneuve (provincial electoral district)

message: The borders do not make sense. Peter Horn 03:29, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The following table shows which Montreal streets run north south and which ones run east west. These are the Montreal conventional and traditional designations and it also shows those streets that already have their own article. Hence Sherbrooke Street runs east west (or vice versa). I hope I clarified myself. See
 Peter Horn 18:49, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borders 
Talk:Jean-Talon

message: I don't if it's just a temporary problem but by clicking the Jean-Talon link (the article about the riding) several other pages while it is correctly written or typing simply Jean-Talon in the search box it gives a page load error. 
Redirect Loop
Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete.
The browser has stopped trying to retrieve the requested item. The site is redirecting the request in a way that will never complete.
    * Have you disabled or blocked cookies required by this site?
    * NOTE: If accepting the site's cookies does not resolve the problem, it is likely a server configuration issue and not your computer.
I did the same operation with Jean-Lesage (again the article about riding) and it goes to the article. --JForget  15:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem seems solved, it is working normally. Might have being just a temporary glitch with either the browser or the page. JForget  15:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with the link
Talk:Rosemont (provincial electoral district)

message: What is really north, south, east and west in this provincial riding and all others??? Could some one make some maps and sort this out? Peter Horn 00:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The following table shows which Montreal streets run north south and which ones run east west. These are the Montreal conventional and traditional designations and it also shows those streets that already have their own article. Hence Sherbrooke Street runs east west (or vice versa), not north south.  I hope I clarified myself. See 
 Peter Horn 19:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points of the compass
Talk:Verdun (provincial electoral district)

message: What is the rationale for marking the 2012 CAQ percentage of the vote as a delta versus the 2008 ADQ percentage?  What do the parties have in common to justify this? Nephtes (talk) 16:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAQ vs ADQ? 
Talk:Gunborg Åhling

message: This article is less than a stub and needs work. Bio portal, info box and more references. A picture would be nice also. Enfermero (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NTFS/Archive 1

message: Can we have some more discussion about fragmentation? How come Microsoft Windows NT 4 didn't include a defreg tool, but Microsoft Windows 2000 did? Edward 12:35, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Marketing.  Easier to include a basic defrag tool than put up with FUD from the likes of Executive Software about the evils of fragmentation.  In reality, fragmentation-induced split I/Os are really rather unusual.  DrPizza 12:49, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Not quite: Lance Jensen & his crew at Executive had a license to the NTFS version in NT 3.51, which led to the original MoveFile() API. In NT4, the MoveFile() API was embedded in the operating system; but it was left up to Executive and Raxco to use it. Symantec's Speed Disk did not use this API, and it led to a LOT of grief. Dan Schwartz, Mac-NT Mailing List Moderator Discpad 21:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fragmentation

message: Aside from control characters, what characters aren't allowed in an NTFS file name? Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 12:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aside from Unicode NULL (0x0000), you can use the caracther you like, at least anything from 0x0020 to 0xFFFF inclusive (I think no one tested with anything from 0x0001 to 0x001F). —Claunia 14:55, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forbidden characters? 

message: I know this is a pet peeve of mine, and I've made these changes before.  Can this page please refer to NTFS versions that are technically correct?  NTFS 5.0 is two major versions into the future - it will be really confusing if NTFS "5" is still being used to refer to 3.0.  (Just the other day I had somebody think "NTFS 4" refered to "NTFS in NT 4".) Malx 10:00, 14 Apr 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions 

message: There is currently a line in the article, "Others: FreeBSD, eComStation and Mac OS X versions 10.3 and later offer read-only NTFS support. A free third-party tool for BeOS, which was based on NTFS-3G, allows full NTFS read and write. The read/write NTFS-3G driver has been also ported to FreeBSD, Mac OS X, NetBSD, Haiku and FreeDOS.". This, however, does not specify the name, creator, etc. of the third-party tool, or where it can be found. Could someone add it in? Does the tool have its own article? Thanks, samwaltz 01:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you specifically asking about the BeOS port, because I think the article is being a little optimistic.  Someone did announce that they'd started porting the NTFS-3G driver back in September last year, but at the time he qualified it as "highly experimental", and since then it hasn't been mentioned.  AlistairMcMillan 02:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: If you are just asking about the NTFS-3G driver, we have a separate page here NTFS 3G.  AlistairMcMillan 02:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Detail request
Talk:Loni Love

message: wiki has her age as 45. episode airing march 9, 2017 she says she is 46, and repeats that
several times when others are surprised and ask her to confirm it. the birth year is wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.192.199.22 (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  age 
Talk:(Much) Wenlock (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I have de-redlinked William Leighton who was MP in 1601. There is no need for an article headed 'William Leighton (MP)' because he is the same man, according to his History of Parliament biography, as the Sir William Leighton who was a composer and appears under William Leighton, an article I have populated with detail from the HOP.Cloptonson (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: William Leighton
Talk:Aberconwy (UK Parliament constituency)

message: map needs 2019 added  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:D529:4601:B441:D423:185C:23F9 (talk) 13:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Abertillery (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Neil was supposed to have stood here in February 1974 ..but there aren't any records. JRPG (talk) 20:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neil Hamilton (politician) 
Talk:Darlington Bus War

message: This section: "Busways called in several vehicles from its other subsidiaries, and repainted several of its surplus Atlanteans into Stagecoach stripes[2], notable because none of Busways Atlanteans were ever painted in Stagecoach livery." doesn't make a lot of sense for several reasons.
The picture linked (ref 2) is of a Leyland Fleetline, not an Atlantean, stated on the photo description as being a Busways vehicle but in Stagecoach livery.
I propose rewording as follows unless there's a better (accurate) alternative:
"Busways called in several vehicles from its other subsidiaries, and repainted them into Stagecoach stripes[2]."
The footnote needs rewording too as it's not an Atlantean in the picture.
MarkyMarkD (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Radio New Zealand

message: I am a regular Radio New Zealand listener and visitor to their website and social media accounts. I noticed that their content refers to the organisation as "RNZ" and rarely uses the name "Radio New Zealand." I am proposing renaming the article RNZ and turning the Radio New Zealand namespace into a redirect page. RNZ seems to be following a similar trend as other media organisations such as TVNZ, ABC News, ABC News (Australia), NPR, PBS and BBC. Wanted to get feedback before I go ahead. Andykatib (talk) 22:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it a fairly recent change? I don't listen all that often to them, but I've never heard other people refer to them as RNZ - it's always been Radio New Zealand. In comparison, almost almost everyone refers to Television New Zealand as TVNZ. I'd suggest waiting a while to see if it is commonly used outside the organisation before moving it. 2001:4530:2:E07:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFD (talk) 00:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename