lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Luftverkehr Friesland-Harle

message: This article is in dire need of secondary sources. So far, apart from crash reports at the Aviation Safety Network (which do not deal with the airline itself), there is only one snippet from the World Airline Directory of Flightglobal, so not exactly the "significant coverage" that is required per WP:CORP.--FoxyOrange (talk) 10:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary sources needed 
Talk:Jamie Hector

message: in the first section it mentions he is in Oz, but not who he played. in the second section it mentions that imdb incorrectly has him listed as being in Oz. so was he? or not? if not, i can only assume that someone used imdb to enter the info in the first section. proves that imdb is not always reliable. mind you, we all know most of the info is submitted by users, just like here on wikipedia... i've never watched Oz, so i can't confirm. 77.97.110.57 (talk) 00:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: was he in OZ or not?
Talk:Titusville, New Jersey

message: I suggest that this article be trimmed down. The bottom paragraphs are all about Washington_Crossing_State_Park.  I think these paragraphs should be removed, and this article should just mention the park (including a link to Washington_Crossing_State_Park).  That is, put information about the Village here and information about the park on the park's article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by K keith (talk • contribs) 20:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion - remove several paragraphs
Talk:Grigori F. Krivosheev

message: Irpen, I respect your editing, but disagree in your evaluation of Suvorov's work as a "non-scientific sensationalist analysis" and "Suvorov's crackpot". Given that Suvorov did not ride the state machinery to work for him, his insights and statistical back-up are profound. Many mega-trends do not need detailed analysis, as is said "Large things are visible from afar", and the years of propaganda could never cloud the fact that Russia lost near-all their men and supplies in the first week of the war. This fact is no "crackpot", he broke secretiveness by fingering a naked king, and silencing the thesis of the Suvorov's book as opposed to the line of the state-supported publication does not present a balanced picture. Taking sides before independent historians canvass the problem is presumptuous, especially when the state is known to chronically manipulate scientific reports. I am saying this not to discredit Krivosheev, he has done a very important and probably good research, but to argue for a balanced picture about the controversy where Krivosheev serves to illuminate one side. Barefact 01:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I checked this man in ISI citation index. His citation index is exactly zero (no one cites him). Number of hits in Google books is zero
. Number of hits in Google scholar is zero .Biophys (talk) 00:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check this for refs. --Irpen 04:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I think he is notable; I've seen his work referenced in several sources I have read over the years.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  05:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability problems
Talk:Reportage

message: I've been working on the stub for Broadcast Journalism. I'd appreciate any feedback anyone has as well as any suggestions for further expansion on the article.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmac9986 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback 

message: Duplication of first few paras introduced on 26 Feb 2012 by anon 2.99.52.230 . Everyone since then has just left it in, so perhaps it's just me thinking it's duplication, but I've read it three times and cleaned me seeing glasses and shaken my head and I'm still seeing duplication. Randal Oulton (talk) 23:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication
Talk:Open-source journalism

message: Huge amount of overlap here. Both articles could use clean-up, but that might be best starting after selecting content from both and creating one decent C-class article out of it. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 21:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to edit post-merge. Given no objections to the merge,  Klbrain (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Wiki journalism]]
Talk:George Polk Awards

message: George Polk Awards have been given every year since 1948, yet more than half of this article is dedicated to the 2015 awards. That's massively undue. I think the section on the 2015 prizes should be renamed something like "Notable Awards" or "Historical Awards," and should give an overview of the most notable awards given in the history of the prize. That would entail deleting most of the information on the 2015 prizes, unless they really are the most notable prizes given since 1948. -Thucydides411 (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly focused on 2015 awards 

message: This detailed examination of claims made by and for Polk regarding his WW II service dates from 2007. https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/35737  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:2B80:255F:C024:1337:2E45:CA8E (talk) 20:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over Polk's claims
Talk:Chinese Massacre Cove

message: This is an awkward neologism, & definitely should be replaced with a better word. However, I can't think of another word than the more objectionable "White American"--which is the term that the contemporary sources used. -- llywrch (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to white, see edit summary. 72.198.26.61 (talk) 17:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Euro American"? 

message: If you are reading this, please see if we can make this article consistent with a closely related article, Hells Canyon massacre. Kirby777 (talk) 03:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related article
Talk:The Complete Beatles

message: There really needs to be only the one entry for this item. The documentary was never named with the correct spelling "complete" in the IMdb.com entry
:"Merge" done.  (There were really only parts of two sentences in this article that were not already in the other article.)  6SJ7 23:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merging with Compleat Beatles
Talk:Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting

message: The entirety of the aforementioned section is made of quotations from one webpage. Obviously quoting is fine, but when there is nothing in the section except quotations and all those quotations are from the same source, it might be/border on plagiarism, so I think someone needs to take a look at this.
--EcheveriaJ (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , if you are referring to Note 3-7: Those are referring to different websites. It is the same root domain (pulitzer.org) but different websites, a plagiarism detector further did not find any exciting. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting" Section
Talk:Lufthansa CityLine

message: I don't know what municipality the FOC is located in, so I don't know which city has the "headquarters"? WhisperToMe (talk) 17:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Headquarters city?
Talk:Pulitzer Prize for Public Service

message: Final line of the opening paragraph:
Every one of the winning newspapers has been based in the USA.
Isn't this redundant, as the Pulitzer is a USA award for USA publishing?  The sentence makes it sound as if the board awarding the prize is biased, when in fact they are following the rules. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I simply removed it.  It's an American award for Americans. --JayHenry (talk) 16:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA only 

message: No, seriously.  That is how it is viewed and that is how the decision to award it is made. 69.18.28.141 (talk) 20:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the Pulitzer be considered a political award now?
Talk:Television news in the United States

message: Shouldn't it be this news? 89.249.0.170 (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  These news 

message: Is there an equivalent article of this one for newspapers: Newspaper of record? I can't put my cursor on one. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 22:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Televised news outlets of record? [Query]
Talk:List of MegaMan NT Warrior episodes

message: Do you think maybe we should add the US numbers to the JP numbers, like in List of Pokémon episodes and List of Kirby: Right Back at Ya! episodes? Matty-chan 01:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode number suggestion
Talk:Te Pīhopatanga o Te Manawa o Te Wheke

message: The use of Maori terms in this  article makes it virtually incomprehensible.  Could someone clean it up? john k 01:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: maybe have it in mi:Hau Kāinga. DMBFFF (talk) 22:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Posting to inform that I have nominated :File:TMOTW crest transparent (4).gif for deletion at possibly unfree files, you can find my reasoning and comment on the nomination here. Regards, Acather96 (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly unfree files nomination of [[:File:TMOTW crest transparent (4).gif]]
Talk:Sopranino clarinet

message: OK with me.  As it says in the article, not everyone uses "sopranino clarinet" as a synonym for "piccolo clarinet", but those that do not seem to be in a distinct minority.  -- Rsholmes 02:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd prefer a merge/redirect to "clarinet family" as a sort of disambiguation page for this term which seems to refer as often to E-flat clarinet as to the even higher clarinets.  A quick google search shows the term used for E-flat as often as A-flat (once you get beyond the Wikipedia pages and clones that dominate the first page or two), and my suspicion is that in the printed literature it applies to E-flat more often than A-flat (if only because there's so much more literature on E-flat and D clarinets than A-flat).  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 17:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Marauder

message: Isn't there a more generic meaning of maurauder; something that would fit into an encyclopedia?
Fixed. --HanzoHattori 09:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Harry Potter bit under entertainment is incorrect. The Marauder's Map was made by four students of Hogwarts(James Potter aka Pongs, Sirius Black aka Padfoot, Remus Lupin aka Moony, and Peter Pettigrew aka Wormtail). Sorry to have such a nerd moment, but the way it is worded makes it seem that The Marauder's Map is one of the four students who goes to Hogwarts. Lydaday (talk) 10:51, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The present wording is "One of the four fictional characters in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban who created the Marauder's Map".  The four students are fictional characters who appeared in that book and created the map.  One of those four could be referred to as a marauder.  I'm afraid I don't understand your objection. Nick Number (talk) 16:50, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Marauder's Map
File talk:US speed limits.svg

message: Hey, I think the appearance of Texas is kind of deceptive. The 80 mph limits are only available in statutorily-specified regions of the state. Is it possible to break it down by county? Nova SS 02:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I modified the graphic to show how little of Texas is really affected by >70 mph limits. I also showed which areas cannot have limits higher than 65 due to environmental speed limits. It sure would be nice if there was an automated way of producing these graphics. Nova SS 13:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  I didn't know what the county breakdown of Texas was, thanks.  --Shadowlink1014 22:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At least one county, Duval County, is missing from the 75 mph map.  Its population is 7 persons per sq mile and 75 mph is posted on US 59 through the county (except in the vicinity of Freer).  Other counties may be missing; please verify. lordsutch (talk) 05:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I uploaded a new version of the map with Duval County colored for 75 mph. lordsutch (talk) 06:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texas 

message: Sections of the I-15 in Utah have been raised to 80 mph. The map should be changed to reflect that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CKBrown1000 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Utah 

message: The map looks bad in my opinion with Texas having speed limit breakdown by county. The map should should be changed to the 80 mph color.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigma229 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the county by county speed limits in Texas 

message: The map has been updated to reflect higher speed limits in Ohio and Texas. --Pgp688 (talk) 23:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newer version 

message: Please be sure to change Kansas' coloring no earlier than 0500 UTC on 7/1/11 to reflect the change from 70 to 75 on controlled-access freeways. DavidSteinle (talk) 03:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kansas 

message: Add I-49 for Saint Landry through Desoto for 75MPH. Saint Martin for I-10 is 60 MPH. 'Mcdonaat  →  22:24, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  If you're going to do county maps for Texas...
Talk:Higashiyama Line

message: I am relatively new here and don't have all the basic etiquette and procedures down just yet, so I was wondering what this stub needs in order to upgrade. I live in Aichi and use this station on a fairly regular basis and have somewhat more than passable Japanese skills. So what kind of information should I be seeking out for inclusion in this and other similar articles? Colincbn 02:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also just realized that although this article is located under "Japanese Rail Stubs" the standard tag about this being a stub that is usually at the top of the page is not here. Has this article already been upgraded? It seems to have a fairly good amount of information which leads me to believe so. If that is the case should someone remove it from the "Stubs" category? Colincbn 02:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK, this article has not been updated. Compared with the Japanese article, we still lack sections on its services, train cars, and history. Also, for this line, we have no station articles written yet, except of Nagoya Station. Currently, the situation is similar for other Nagoya Subway articles. (Although it's still better than Meitetsu line articles, most of which don't exist yet.) I believe you are more than welcome to contribute here. Kzaral 15:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Upgrading
Talk:2007 V8 Supercar season

message: Don't delete Team Kiwi Racing from the list of drivers and teams. Even if the team never races again, they did race in season 2007. --Falcadore 03:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Racer1 can you please revert the last edit? Macrow and Radisich may not be current Team Kiwi drivers anymore, but they did driver for Team Kiwi. If Wikipedia is to be a permanent record of what transpired during season 2007 then it needs to reflect all the drivers who competed for the whole season, not just the drivers at the most recent round, or are you going to delete Brad Jones and Fabian Coulthard, neither of which will race at the next round, as well? Both Macrow and Radisich are in the points table, the list of drivers and teams should say who they drove with. --Falcadore 08:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Team Kiwi Racing
Talk:Contrabass

message: I'm not sure of the best way of ordering this list.  The new "alphabetical" ordering isn't really strictly alphabetical; it has families (within each main section -- e.g. flutes, clarinets, oboes within the woodwind section) alphabetically, with specific instruments in each family by pitch.  I think this is a bit confusing.  The original list seemed to try to keep similar types of instruments together, e.g. flutes, single reeds, double reeds.  Roughly speaking, sorted by Hornbostel-Sachs number and then by pitch.  But this ordering may be confusing too.  Strict alphabetical ordering is a possibility, but I think it's more useful to keep similar instruments together. -- Rsholmes 02:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordering
Talk:OLT Express Germany

message: Info in:
* German: https://www.olt.de/info/impressum/
** http://www.webcitation.org/60hBG7KPB
* Low German: https://www.olt.de/nds/info/impressum/
** http://www.webcitation.org/60hBCzjGv
WhisperToMe (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headquarters info
File talk:Op hurricane.jpg

message: This doesn't even remotely look like a real test.
Looks like a photoshop. Bkkeim2000 04:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing it to my attention. It appears to have been colourised by another user - the image is supposed to be black and white. I've re-uploaded the original image. -- ChrisO 10:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Golden-rumped sengi

message: Please help me. i am doing a paper on the Distribution/ History of the Golden Rumped Elephant Shrew.
& i don't have enough info to write a 4 paragraph paper. HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:If you really want help I suggest that you don't mess with the article. How long do the paragraphs have to be? Sabine's Sunbird  talk 02:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Your contributions look great.  One thing I would suggest is trying to find a usable photograph of the species instead of an illustration.  However, I understand that finding usable images of some of these lesser-known mammals can be quite a challenge.
Great job,
Baoubre (talk) 07:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Phil Cuzzi

message: Here's a citation (though I'm sure there are some more reliable) showing the crew acknowledging his missed call in the recent game, if anyone wants to add it . 206.127.185.95 (talk) 03:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is controversial about this article?  Are the facts in dispute?  Tomsv 98 (talk) 23:59, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the tone could be considered negative, I suppose. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 20:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:Reporter's privilege

message: Several legal references I've seen () spell it "reporter's privilege", rather than "reporters' privilege," as used here. Are there some cases where the privilege should be used as referring only a single reporter rather than plural reporters? Or perhaps the singular is more accepted in legal circles, in which case this page should be moved to the correct spelling. --Quantum7 00:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Your observation appears to be correct.  I think it's fair to move it.  Chicken Wing (talk) 06:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

text: The intro should probably have a note that says it is sometimes referred to as reporters' privilege or journalist's privilege.  Chicken Wing (talk) 06:55, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I tagged Reporter's privilege with  to start the move process. We can fix up the intro afterwards. I did find several credible references which use "reporters' privilege" in their titles (presumably to address the rights of many reporters), but "reporter's privilege" is used exclusively within the text.Stephen Bates. "Getting to the Source: The curious evolution of reporters' privilege." Slate. Dec. 26, 2003. Accessed Feb 11, 2013. "Reporters' Privilege" Electronic  Frontier Foundation. Accessed Feb 11, 2013. TITLE 10: CHAPTER 43. Subchapter II. Reporters' Privilege. Deleware Courts and Judicial Procedure. Accessed Feb 11, 2013.
 I still think that the page should be moved. --Quantum7 00:00, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

text: The move occurred while I was drafting the above message on the old talk. I'm including it here for completeness. --Quantum7 00:00, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Coroner's Court of the Australian Capital Territory

message: Secret service, national security, and Australian Federal Police dirt files manufactured by members with provision of material and equipment from Government (perhaps to prevent truth) simply will never see a Corners Court, ever.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.229.56.203 (talk) 05:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'has the power' 
Talk:The Muslim World

message: The text of the article "The Muslim World" is closely related to a longer text, a member called SophiaShah posted in 09-26-2005 as this member's only contribution in World Affairs Board, see http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/current-events/8429-television-series-muslim-world-javed-malik-ary-tv.html.
I have questions whether all information is correct: At the University of St. Andrews there is a Honorary Professor Matthew W. Dickie for Classical Languages, no historian James Dickie.
James Dickie is known as the civil or birth name of Yakub Zaki, later mentioned in the same article
Efes 02:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Darren Mack/Archive 1

message: I have a commitment to Landmark Education being represented fairly and within Wikipedia's NPOV policy.  The edits made by an editor named Smeelgova have been consistently irrelevant to the subject of the page and mostly anti-Landmark Education points of view including linking Darren Mack's page through a Rick Ross Institute link, which I have removed. In case anyone
doesn't know, Rick Ross is a self proclaimed expert in the area of LGAT's and cults. He has "a thing" for LE as well as other mainstream philosophies like Yoga, the Mormon church and the author John Gray.  The truth is that he is a convicted felon who has no professional training or degree. I understand that he has never actually participated in LE programs and if you
read much of what he writes about (as with the aforementioned Smeelgova in Wikipedia) it is obvious they do not have any direct experience on the company. 
At any rate, it is unfortunate that there is not much a person or company can do to defend themselves fully on the internet since anyone can write anything they want and come off as an expert. I believe that Rick Ross or someone else is doing it again (maybe Ross is really Smeelgova) by linking the Darren Mack article to the LE article. First if you read what Rick Ross
says in this link it is clearly written from his personal point of view which is inappropriate for what Wikipedia is out to accomplish and a Wikipedia policy violation. Second, if you are going to put a link between Mack and LE, why not a link between Mack and his other former employers, or between Mack and the college he went to, or between Mack and the movie
studios who produced the most recent movies he saw. Such links would not be appropriate inside a commitment to creating a scholarly resource (Wikipedia), and simply more "gossip" worthy only of print space in People Magazine, Star Magazine or The National Enquirer, where inuendo, conjecture and hearsay are the literary order of the day. . . that is my POV which
belongs here on the talk page and not in the article. WBLman 22:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 