Talk:Main Page/Archive 63

message: Did Britanica come up with the idea of featuring an article on their main page before us? The Wayback Machine doesn't show this in 2004. Check out their main page now - they have featured articles! - Ta bu shi da yu 03:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes but their featured article changes every few seconds. It's more like our Featured content portal which gives a different featured article every minute.-gadfium 03:56, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britannica home page 

message: The text on main page has: "that any perceived inadequacies can be rationally explained." That is poor English. Please make it "can be explained rationally". Thanks.
:Either way is correct English.
::But have different meanings - the first is an explanation which is rational; the second where the explanation (whether rational or not) is given in a unrelevent subject. Bazza 12:36, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Bazza's correct. I'm a professional copy-editor. Zachkchk 14:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  please correct text for Noahs Ark 

message: :Question unrelated to MainPage. Moved to talkpage of the Wikipedian who asked the question. -- PFHLai 13:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Embarrasing 

message: In the caption for the featured picture, "Austalia" should be "Australia". Thanks, Graham talk 11:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The 'r' is no longer missing. Thanks for pointing that out. -- PFHLai 13:11, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelling 

message: On the news section of the main page, there is a picture of Moussaui related to the third story listed on the page, however, the picture appears to the right of a bullet mentioning the Christian convert in Afghanistan.  The picture should be taken down to avoid confusion.  Please remove this entry when the error has been fixed.
March 28, 2006
—This unsigned comment was added by 71.35.98.183 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 2006 March 28 (UTC).
=== I'm going to faint... ===
You put Moussaoui next to released...
[swoon]
-User:VKokielov
: It says "(pictured)" on the third news item. -- PFHLai 15:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: News items are listed chronologically. We currently do not have a free image for the first two items. --PFHLai 15:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely there's a way to put there the image next to the text it goes with, same as in a regular article.  No?  —JerryFriedman 18:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, I thought that the pictured guy was Abdul Rahman...the frighteningly knowledgeable web design  Wikipedians should know what to do.Osbus 18:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, but the problem is that the image is not of Zacarias Moussaoui, and yet it claims that Zacarias Moussaoui is "(pictured)" LassiLantar 20:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  News Photo 

message: You put Moussaoui next to released...
[swoon]
-User:VKokielov
: It says "(pictured)" on the third news item. -- PFHLai 15:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: News items are listed chronologically. We currently do not have a free image for the first two items. --PFHLai 15:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely there's a way to put there the image next to the text it goes with, same as in a regular article.  No?  —JerryFriedman 18:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, I thought that the pictured guy was Abdul Rahman...the frighteningly knowledgeable web design  Wikipedians should know what to do.Osbus 18:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, but the problem is that the image is not of Zacarias Moussaoui, and yet it claims that Zacarias Moussaoui is "(pictured)" LassiLantar 20:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm going to faint... 

message: If you look over here, you'll see that in the Orthodox Jewish view, Moses did not author the story of the Ark, rather, God did.  Please correct this.  Thank you!  --aishel 20:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Noah's Ark Correction

message: Moussaoui continues to be listed as (pictured) despite the fact that the French riots and now Kadima are pictured. -209.115.232.94 20:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the News error. 

message: In the news item about the French protests, "protestors" should be "protesters" (per www.dict.org).  (I mentioned this in Template_talk:In the news but that doesn't seem to get acted on very much.) Phr 20:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  another misspelling 

message: Please correct the spelling of "Chistmas" to "Christmas."  Thanks, Rewster 04:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! Please do correct the spelling.  It is not spelled that way in the article! Thank you. 04:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelling in today's featured picture (Kiritimati) 

message: When I move my mouse over the "My Watchlist, My Contributions, My Preferences" bar at the top of the page it jumps from the top right corner to the top left.  This only happens on the frontpage.  Has some joker included some code to do this or is there something wrong on my end?  It's fairly harmless, but we don't want pranks getting out of hand. Quarkstorm 08:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slightly Odd 

message: Kadima did not "win" the Israeli election. Perhaps it should be changed to "wins a plurality of votes and seats"? Batmanand | Talk 10:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends what you mean by "win". I find "win" regarding elections fairly self-explanatory - more so than "wins a plurality of votes and seats", whatever that means. Anyway, [BBC News] says he "won". Bazza 12:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

text: [Apologies - I inadvertantly changed your comment - reverted.] Bazza 12:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A plurality is the biggest share of the vote, if that share is under 50%. A "win" has implications (at least to me) of a majority of either the vote or the number of seats in the parliament. What do others think? Batmanand | Talk 12:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Win" itself is oversimplification. It implies a winner-take-all system, which is not the case. I agree with Batmanand above.  Cdcon  15:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just added plurality to that line on ITN. Thanks for pointing that out. -- PFHLai 17:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry to be a pain, but you cannot "win plurality". Can you change the wording to "wins a plurality"? Thanks! Batmanand | Talk 19:50, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just added the 'a'. Thanks. -- PFHLai 22:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITN correction 

message: I think the article should have link to Solar eclipse of 2006-Mar-29 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.197.129.54 (talk • contribs) 
- I agree, so... Done. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 12:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About eclipse 

message: ... In "In the news" and "On this day..." - seems a bit redundant! Shouldn't "On this day" feature only events from previous years, anyway? — SteveRwanda 12:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, 'On this day' (OTD) also lists holidays, time of equinox ... Whoever put the eclipse on ITN didn't take it off OTD. I was just about to remove it from OTD, after cleaning up ITN a bit, and got beaten to it by a fellow admin by a few minutes. .... -- PFHLai 17:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipse mentioned twice 

message: Shouldn't the link on the PoTD be nuclear testing not just nuclear weapons? QmunkE 13:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Thanks, BanyanTree 16:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic of the Day 

message: I live in Eastern Brazil and the shadow didn't reach us at all. The appropriate would be Northeastern Brazil. --Kripkenstein 13:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is the eclipsde mentioned twice? Both in ITN and On this day Borisblue 14:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Try asking this question on Template Talk:In the news. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 14:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  See above #Eclipse mentioned twice. -- PFHLai 17:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total solar eclipse may be observed in Eastern Brazil (...) 

message: There are serious copyright concerns with the solar eclipse image so it should be immediately removed from the main page. NASA policy states that media is uncopyrighted unless copyright is stated and on this animation copyright is clearly stated so it cannot even be used not to mention being on the front page.  The image should be immediately taken off the front page and should be listed for deletion if not immediately be deleted due to it being a copyvio. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 15:28, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Eek! I've removed it from ITN already. Johnleemk | Talk 15:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with the solar eclipse animation 

message: The redirect for the solar eclipse article needs to be fixed. It currently goes to Solar eclipse on 2006 March 29, but it should go to Solar eclipse on 29 March 2006. joturner 04:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Pepsidrinka 05:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix Redirect 

message: This picture doesn't deserve to be Featured. The sunlight areas are burnt out and the color scheme does a bad job of portraying the livliness of a rainforest. If the picture had been taken in a rain, it would have been feature material, but currently it's rather unattractive, Loom91 08:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your aesthetic judgement would be best expressed at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. There should be an archive of the vote on how this photo got featured somewhere and if, after reading it, you think it should be delisted, please follow the instructions for delisting at the bottom of the candidates page.  - BanyanTree 14:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The candidacy is archived here. Redquark 19:42, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undeserving POTD 

message: Surely "future" is a mistake.--128.139.226.36 09:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "future" was not exactly a mistake - the word is used to let the reader know that the person was not yet President by the time he married. I do understand that using "future" in that context is grammatically correct, but doesn't sound correct when viewed commonsensically. --Gurubrahma 13:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: what? if anything, it's incorrect now. No "former president" was married at the Royal Presidio Chapel. The person who was married there was the then-future president Hoover. Or else drop the president, and just say "Herbert Hoover was married". It's certainly worse now for the 'correction'. dab (ᛏ) 13:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Re-fixed to "...that, before he was President of the United States, Herbert Hoover was married at the Royal Presidio Chapel in Monterey, California?" - UtherSRG (talk) 14:00, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: It'd Make a good April Fools joke though. -Dhodges 16:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That it would! *grins* - UtherSRG (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "future President of the United States Herbert Hoover" 

message: The raspberries link in the text box on Today's featured picture is actually to a disambiguation page.  I suspect raspberry is the correct link.  Thanks, --Kralizec! (talk) 02:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  While I was at it, I wikified Innoko National Wildlife Refuge as I doubt it gets much main page exposure and it seemed wrong to deny it its moment in the sun. :) Cheers, BanyanTree 02:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POTD: Alaska wild berries 

message: "that the term Cicisbei refers to legal and generally respected companions..." Shouldn't that be something like "that Cicisbei were legal and generally respected companions..."? The article isn't about the term itself, after all.  Hibbleton 10:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This item is no longer on MainPage. -- PFHLai 16:46, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  From Did You Know 

message: i think wikipedia should have chat rooms —This unsigned comment was added by Richlandbilly (talk • contribs) 15:34, 2006 March 31 (UTC).
: Are you paying the bills ? Try IRC instead. -- PFHLai 16:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? What question was this? And more importantly, was the answer correct? -- Gurch 19:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  chat  

message: This section begins with:
:A selection of Alaskan wild berries from Innoko National Wildlife Refuge.
which is not a complete sentence.  It should probably be reworded to be a bit less jarring.  — orioneight (talk) 18:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just did a substantial rewrite.  I double-check for grammar and readability would be much appreciated.  Thanks, BanyanTree 19:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me! Much more readable now.  Thank you.  — orioneight (talk) 19:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today's featured picture [31 Mar 2006] 

message: The today in history section says "New Zealander inventor Richard Pearse..." either "New Zealander Richard Pearse..." or "New Zealand inventor Richard Pearse" dmcg026 19:51, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjective for New Zealand = New Zealand 

message: Could someone fix the type "that the there were" in the bit about the Year of the Six Emperors.  Where is the 'right' place to mention typos and other embarrassments, in the pages subsidiary to the main page? Shenme 20:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say here would be the place to mention it. I can't fix this though, at least not yet. Prodego talk 21:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Trolling for votes? Shame!  Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 06:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Did you know - typo - how to fix 

message: As the link seems to have moved.
Suggestion for another time/equivalents.
Links to Lord of Misrule and suchlike - also, a list of possible future Wiki developments such as Vandalopedia and Wikigovernment (mentioned variously on BJAODN lists).
Jackiespeel 21:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing yet? -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 00:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The top news item on ITN (Thai newspaper) is the joke, right? -- 199.71.174.100 00:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was there yesterday, so I don't think so. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 00:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Such a trivial thing as the top news item on ITN for so long ?!?!  That must be a bad joke. Maybe someone should update the space item and mention that the shuttle crew has reached the International Space Station. -- 199.71.174.100 22:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: April Fools Day

message: Could someone put this up? See Wikipedia talk:April Fool's Main Page for more information. zafiroblue05 | Talk 00:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The April Fool's page is at least mostly factual. (I'm not sure about "In the news", but I think everything else is true) - however, I was reverted, so I'm not touching it again. – ABCDe✉ 01:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, you transcluded the development page (which was intended as an example), and you did so without protecting it (thereby exposing the main page to all forms of potential vandalism)!  Secondly, it appears as though no one bothered to make any sort of advance arrangements for this content to be used, so it probably is too late (given the degree of discussion that this should have entailed).  —David Levy 01:57, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Alright, I do notice that it is mostly true, but April Fools is supposed to be a day of tricks, not wacky random facts.  It would be more in the spirit to add something like "Osama Bin Laden Captured" and then have that link to the April Fools Day or Practical Joke article, but maybe not something so controversial that can get the wikipedia haters on our case. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 01:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that was sort of the point - that something like "Osama bin Laden Captured" would basically be a lie - the New York Times wouldn't publish such an article on April 1 (unless it happened!). To quote the original proposal - "Wikipedia should not be so formal and humourless that it cannot show some whimsy in how it presents itself to its readers." Maybe keep the same in the news template (the April's Fools news content was added very late compared to the rest of the stuff, which was much-edited) but keep the rest. That "Sigh" of the reversion is so humorless. Sigh. ;) zafiroblue05 | Talk 01:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Maybe we should try a poll while it's still early in the day GMT?  See what others think. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 01:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about this... People would be expected April Fools' tricks today. But they wait and wait and wait, and nothing happens. At the end of the day, they'd be puzzled to no end, having expected an April Fools' mainpage, but seeing none. So the joke is now on them! April Fools! -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 01:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Could do that, definitely... But a poll where? Here? Maybe this should have been taken care of previously - but then again, if it had been done previously, it would have been on that talk page, which would have gotten a nonrandom sample... So, sure, let's do a poll. zafiroblue05 | Talk 02:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never done a poll myself, and this could take a while.  Also, I'm assuming it's already the end of April Fool's Day in many parts of the world, and on top of that, not many places (Latin America for example) celebrate a Fool's day today.  I agree this should've been done earlier.  I think all we can do now is come up with a clever way to trick people, if any; or do what Miborovsky says.  Also, mentioning our intentions on talk:main page is counter-productive, don't you think? -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 02:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, pretty much so. :) Then again, when I first asked to put the page up, it didn't say what it was about except in a link... So it could have just been slipped onto the main page... As to the time, April 1 hasn't yet begun in any of the US or Canada - but has well begun in England and is winding down in much of the rest of the world... So it does seem to be too late. Miborovsky's idea does seem pretty good, though - very meta... ;) zafiroblue05 | Talk 02:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is 5:38 pm in Australia (I think thats's +10 hours to GMT), this means it's probably 7:30 or so in the nations nearest to the International Date Line. So this gives you around 3-4 hours to accomodate for those nations and let them see something on April Fools Day. Is that enough time? Nobleeagle  (Talk) 06:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To an admin

message: ...but I didn't expect to see them coming from respected admins.  It truly saddens me to see the main page repeatedly vandalized.  This is an encyclopedia 365 days per year (366 in leap years), and it's unfortunate that some of you would prefer to transform it into a joke website.  I also hate the fact that I can't even post this complaint without being portrayed as a humorless killjoy.  —David Levy 05:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I and thousands of others support you David. Humour is subjective, and i find none of today's "pranks" amusing, especially in a worldwide encyclopedia endeavour. --Quiddity 19:11, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: IF you have an april fool's joke rumor has it that Jaranda is keeping a page full of em so send it over to him and keep it only in the userspace. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 05:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Starts distributing funny bones to those who lack them. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 05:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, I hate the fact that anyone who opposes vandalism on 1 April is portrayed as a humorless killjoy.  —David Levy 06:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It clearly wasn't a personal attack.  —David Levy 06:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur; not a personal attack. But I must say it is appalling that admins are participating in quite a bit of this nonsense. And unprotecting the main page? This is a definite no. I understand that the admins want to be funny, but April Fools' Day is not an excuse to ignore responsibilities. Unfortunately, however, there is so much red tape involved when getting admins censured for actions (which may be why so many are participating in the mayhem). joturner 06:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Well said, sir. --Celestianpower háblame 08:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Are you able to understand that this encyclopedia means a lot to some people, some of whom may actually be *gasp* attempting to learn factual information today, and that April Fool's Day is not a worldwide, universally observed custom?  —David Levy 14:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: No.  I will not look the other way while people vandalize the encyclopedia (simply because they believe that their calendar grants them license to do so on a particular day).  —David Levy 14:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm okay with the extraordinary (but factual) content.  I'm not okay with hoaxes (such as false claims and phony links).  —David Levy 14:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I expected today to be full of childish pranks...

message: Placing it here kills the spontaniety of it, but for those who missed it, this project announcement framed as an April Fool's joke was placed at the top of this talk page:
Special Announcement
Due to generous donations by several large corporations, Wikipedia can now afford to pay editors.  All editors with over 1000 edits are elible to apply.  For details on how to register for the payroll, CLICK HERE.
Unfortunately it was promptly removed.  It is placed here totally in context as a post about the April Fool's fallout phenomenon, with respect to the Main Page (actually, this page, its talk page) and Wikipedia in general.  Cheers.  --Go for it! 18:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is "elible" part of the joke?  —David Levy 18:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, a typo.  Yep, it appears it was a defacto part of the joke.  --Go for it! 18:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Hell yes I would. Part of my job as a Steward is to make sure rogue admins cause no harm. And using admin powers against policy is going rouge. -- mav 00:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Better Red than Dead?  Georgewilliamherbert 03:15, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay, here's the April Fool's joke: an April Fool's joke in a can 

message: Could someone please un-capitalize the word spoo? God, I'm nit-picky... —Bryan Nguyen | Talk 07:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured article 

message: I was immediately suspicious when my browser font size changed. Good job. It almost looked like normal operations. Please return control to the users, however. The wikipedes will get tired of controlling the globe on a volunteer basis. --Ancheta Wis 10:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  April Fools Font 

message: This currently reads "...that the pseudonymous author of the defunct left-wing muckraker blog Media Whores Online has not been identified yet?"  Could someone please change this to "has not yet been identified"?  Thanks! --CrypticBacon 13:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Thanks for the suggestion. Canderson7 (talk) 16:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media Whores Online - new article grammar 

message: It was founded on 5 April 2004 so hardly qualifies as a New article.  —This unsigned comment was added by SteveRwanda (talk • contribs) 15:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That criterion has been relaxed for today only.  —David Levy 15:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is [[Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116]] in DYK? 

message: is there anyway something could be done to prevent the length of time it takes to load the Main page. 
maybe a widget or something?
you can try and get DSL. it loads fine for me. dposse 01:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  main page takes too long to load. 

message: Hey...I liked the multi-colored headers. Osbus 19:30, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The green and blue columns (and darker header colors) haven't changed in the last few weeks..? You may be having browser problems, try clearing your cache. (or are you meaning something else?) --Quiddity 22:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What I have now is:
*Today's featured article is green
*In the News is blue
*Did you know... is green
*On this day... is blue
*and Today's featured picture is purple
Before, I had everything light blue, which I didn't quite like. Osbus 00:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  colors 

message: I'd like to see the current time and date on the main page, would you guys consider making that happen?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.197.254.130 (talk • contribs) 
:The current date and time where? Bazza 10:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, since we couldn't have one time and date because of time zones, we could have the time and date of major cities... Sotakeit 11:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In theory.. there's already a lot on the main page, though. A site like this has the information you need. -- Mithent 14:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time and dates 

message: Should Daylight Saving Time be mentioned in "On this day...", since DST begins today for most of North America? SCHZMO ✍ 12:52, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  —David Levy 17:09, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daylight Saving Time 

message: Under Did You Know, "breakthough" should be "breakthrough". Art LaPella 21:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  —David Levy 21:12, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo