Talk:Maurice Jarre

message: What is a cimbalom? RickK 16:28, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cimbalom 

message: How is Jarre pronounced?
Like "jar," only with a soft "j," as if it were "zh."  Rich 05:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I made a major update to this article. if anyone has an image that is not subject to copyright, please do post it. If you have anything to add or to comment on feel free to do so, BUT PLZ don't edit the article before posting your edits for discussion. Tx A J Damen 09:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: This site: [] has this great man and his art.Agre22 (talk) 01:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Video with this great man

message: I only found reference that are dated today which state he died. Most accurately says he was 84 at the time, but none of them mention the exact day or time it happened. Clearly assuming it was the same day is speculation. He could've died the evening before it was reported. Can someone actually verify the date? - Mgm|(talk) 10:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date 

message: I THINK THAT GUY WHO PUT THAT HOAX QUOTE DIDN'T REALLY MEAN TO VANDALIZE.AFTER ALL, HE ADMITTED TO IT, WAITED TILL NEWSPAPERS TAKE BACK WHAT THEY PUBLISHED,...I MEAN,... IF HE WERE JUST INTERESTED IN MAKING A LITTLE PRANK... HE WOULD HAVE LEFT IT AS IT IS... I THINK HE WAS MORE INTERESTED IN THE RESULT AND EVEN TOOK HIM A MONTH (I THINK) TO TAKE BACK WHAT HE PUT THERE... -BEENG  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.96.25.98 (talk) 02:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree - the article is about Maurice Jarre and he is not notable for that hoax, Shane Fitzgerald is. So either we write an article about Shane Fitzgerald (which probably wouldn't survive because of WP:SINGLEEVENT) or we integrate this stuff in an article about notable vandals, notable hoaxes or equivalent. Laurent (talk) 09:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If Shane perpetrated a second hoax would that get around this WP:SINGLEEVENT problem? Sarah777 (talk) 09:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, provided it wasn't essentially a repeat of the first and also received some coverage in reliable sources. Even then, with two minor hoaxes to his name he would still probably be non-notable. But let's assume he becomes a famous and constant hoaxer - that would possbly justify an article about him while still not justifying reference in this article to his first and fairly minor hoax, the temporary vandalism of the page. Euryalus (talk) 09:47, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Agreed with Laurent - It's not our job to make political or social statements in articles, we're meant to write encyclopaedic articles. Orderinchaos 01:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I usually refer to WP:NAVEL and WP:WEIGHT as the reason we don't add news about the article to the article itself.  We have that  template, you know, "mentioned by multiple media organizations", to document any curiosities like this.  Wikidemon (talk) 16:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think, Crotchety Old Man, that the hoax showed that many MSM journalists take Wiki very seriously indeed! Sarah777 (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Well, it makes sense that your edits have been reverted since you didn't provide any source. How can Wikipedia becomes a "credible source of information", as you say, if it starts accepting unsourced edits from anonymous users? Wikipedia is far from perfect and everybody with some sense kwows it, but it's still a very good starting point when researching a topic. Laurent (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

text: The Shane Fitzgerald article has been nominated for deletion here: . Laurent (talk) 09:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia hoax II 

message: People have opined extensively above on the question about whether any or how much information on the hoax is included here. It may be helpful to have people give their brief opinion summary here, leaving further comment in other sections. Bongomatic 04:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:NAVEL#Articles are about their subjects as was suggested above. This guideline states clearly that articles on Wikipedia "are about their subjects; they are not about the articles themselves". Laurent (talk) 14:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information about hoax--attempt to reach consensus 

message: This article doesn't credit him with composing the music for The Longest Day, yet the Wikipedia article on that film does.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjnyc (talk • contribs) 23:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:   Added.  Also, added "Partial list of notable films"; (there are 167 total). ~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 19:33, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  omission 

message: There are plenty of decent photos; can somebody find one without copyright issues? ~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 19:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo, please. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Maurice Jarre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525122440/http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7014669890 to http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7014669890
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907152149/http://www.moviemusicuk.us/jarre.htm to http://www.moviemusicuk.us/jarre.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified