Talk:Tom Quinn (Spooks)

message: "The phrase Tom Quinn has now become an expression to define someone who refuses to pay their t.v. licence. For example "he is a right tom Quinn" The use of the phrase derives from the phrase tom-foolery and the word quinn meaning t.v. in irish."
I'm not sure how to move text, could someone point me in the right direction? (Very new to this...) Thanks DavidCh0 10:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any sources on the mentioned rumour? Mainly because there have been rumours every year since 2004 about the original cast.. I'm going to remove it soon. ¬_¬  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwilso72 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumours

message: This is tagged as in-universe.  Is the plot summary as currently is too in-universe?  RJFJR (talk) 16:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: In-universe

message: "Reaction towards the character by fans were positive, though critics criticised Macfadyen's portrayal." == both claims need citations -- otherwise, they have no business being here. A little professionalism, please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.119.28 (talk) 05:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Want citations? Look at the reception section, you'de find fans like the character but the critics don't, they're sourced. Lead sections do not require citations, they summarise the rest of the article. -- Matthew RD 14:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading 

message: Is it worth mentioning his specific role in that episode, as the apparant assassin of the head of the Russian ultra-nationalist group? Fluffaduck (talk) 21:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in final episode of tenth series 

message: Wikipedia is based upon mutual respect and everyone remaining polite. Changing the edit of Cziltang Mexico and citing "removed incomprehensible goober fan boy edit" as the reason is childish and infantile.
Don't like an edit feel free to change it, but don't act like a moron unless you want your account shut down.
--195.225.189.243 (talk) 11:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think being insulted counts as a proper reason for reversion. And also a lot of what was said was just speculating. All we really know for sure is that Tom arrives, meets with this guy, and the rest is left up to our imaginations. From the reviews I've seen, some believe he was going to assassinate him. Some others think differently. -- Matthew RD 17:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insulting comments by Newshound 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tom Quinn (Spooks). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714122237/http://www.moviefreak.com/dvd/m/mi5_vol1.htm to http://www.moviefreak.com/dvd/m/mi5_vol1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified