Talk:Tsukihime

message: See the discussion at Talk:Fate/stay night#Removing copyright infringement links and Wikipedia talk:External links#Linking to illegal content, and also the policy at Wikipedia:External links#Restrictions on linking for why these links to Mirror-Moon should NOT be used. If you want to reference this info, find somewhere else that does not distribute illegal content. Also see a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#References that link to illegal content.--十八 00:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing copyright infringement links

message: I don't fucking care whether the translation is authorized, a copyright violation or whatever. It exists so don't be anal about it. --SABEREXCALIBUR! 13:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't belong in the cat. And lose the attitude. AnmaFinotera (talk) 13:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So don't call me a vandal and don't shove irrelevant warning templates about copyvio up my talk page. Yell into a forest and it'll yell back at you. Anyway. You've just edited the category description to suit your argument, which is foul play and gaming the system. --SABEREXCALIBUR! 13:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I edited the category description to clarify the existing stance by the Anime and Manga project. You are the only one arguing that fan-translated games qualify and you give no policy, guidelines, nor consensus to back it up. I'm not the only one to revert your addition of this category to pages. AnmaFinotera (talk) 13:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Um what, this is the only place where I've (re)-added it, and you're the only one (yet) who has reverted it. You're mistaking me for someone else. I base my argument on basic human logic, there is a 100% complete translation of Tsukihime to English. It's that simple. You're talking about fuzzy would-be consensus elsewhere but cite no specifics, how am I supposed to have that convince me? I'm at least supporting my edits with reasoning as to why I make them. --SABEREXCALIBUR! 13:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

text: See the discussion in the project concerning renaming the category. AnmaFinotera (talk) 08:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translated H-game category

message: This series actually crosses over with the Fate series through one of the characters, shouldn't this be mentioned in he article? Tyciol (talk) 05:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no crossover, the series is in a parrallel, but very similar, world to FATE.じんない 09:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be a common thing with this writer having alot of parallel running stories, eg Kara no Kyōkai has a Shiki (female) character with the same ability, and the two magi from both stories are apparently sisters... ADCK (talk) 12:44, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fate

message: The expansion has little unique content and fails notability as it really hasn't had much independent reliable commentary on it nor any unique development. Other visual novels like Popotan.陣内Jinnai 05:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a fandisc with some bonus content and stories. What are you expecting?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.65.245.3 (talk) 12:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plus Disc 

message: An image used in this article, File:TsukihimeGameplayJP.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 28 April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:TsukihimeGameplayJP.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:19, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:TsukihimeGameplayJP.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: review. 
--Gabriel Yuji (talk) 05:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Tsukihime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.siliconera.com/2012/05/19/mahou-tsukai-no-yoru-sequels-in-development-at-type-moon/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120716004549/http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6102347.html to http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6102347.html
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120716103240/http://uk.gamespot.com/ps2/action/meltybloodactcadenza/news.html?sid=6144839&om_act=convert&om_clk=newsfeatures&tag=newsfeatures;title;2 to http://uk.gamespot.com/ps2/action/meltybloodactcadenza/news.html?sid=6144839&om_act=convert&om_clk=newsfeatures&tag=newsfeatures%3Btitle%3B2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The character section is excessively large (1500/4000 words on the article). It seems to go against WP:VGSCOPE (Inappropriate content: Lists of characters lacking secondary sourcing), WP:UNIVERSE (particularly bad here), WP:PLOT and WP:FAN, uses bad fan translations of terminology, and is completely unsourced with loads of factual errors (the character section outside of "remake timeline exclusives" is presented based on the original version and not the remake, but Ciel's age when possessed by Roa is taken from the remake version), bad fan translations of terminology, presenting such bad fan translations as official ("in English, SHIKI's name is written in all-caps"), and outright misinformation that somebody made up (Noel's entire profile). 
The whole section is so problematic I deemed it appropriate to remove it entirely, but since someone restored it I figured I would point out the problems here. At the very least I think all supporting characters should be removed entirely, and the main character profiles should be rewritten to be more succinct, and if nobody is willing to do that then the whole section ought to be removed.
Finally, the only reasoning given for the section being restored was "it's not that long compared to other such lists, and is a standard feature of such artciles" but I do not see how "other articles, which also go against Wikipedia guidelines, are worse" is any form of justification here. 2404:2D00:5000:841:5C9B:A0FA:A047:3541 (talk) 04:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there have been no objections I am cleaning up the character section. 2404:2D00:5000:841:8CD7:6427:A34C:5D4B (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The character section is bloated and filled with misinformation 

message: I want to point out how the gameplay section is riddled with issues: Unsourced opinions ("film noir atmosphere", "requires little interaction "), unsourced questionable statements being passed as fact ("Changes that affect Shiki's opinion on the characters and heroines usually change the direction of the story drastically"), and bizarre stuff like "Near-Side routes (as in "near-moon")" - What is this even trying to say? 
I'm going to remove the problematic parts but wanted to list the problems here first just in case someone decides to revert my edits without bothering to see if they were warranted. 2404:2D00:5000:841:5C9B:A0FA:A047:3541 (talk) 04:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay section is problematic