Talk:ElgooG

message: This should be deleted (per (CSD a7), was an article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that didn't assert the importance or significance of its subject.) 
Not sure what to do about the broken external link on this page. Someone below suggests that elgoog is being updated. Not sure of wikipedia policy.
Cheers
JackSlash (talk) 03:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Too many people are vandalising, we need protection. Uturnaroun 00:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been protected for two weeks. Harryboyles 04:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Protect

message: I'm sure elgoog used to be one of Google's language settings. Doesn't appear to be there now tho. --h2g2bob (talk) 10:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language setting 

message: elgoog is being updated, shouldn't someone put that on the page somewhere? i'm not an experienced editor, so i thought i'd leave it up to you. 17/9/07  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.228.86.206 (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  under construction 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.[?]
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Person, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Auroranorth 13:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automated peer review 1 

message: Can someone get some information as to why this site is blocked by United Arab Emirates? seems wierd? 130.13.47.58 06:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is it blocked in UAE 

message: I undid two revisions due to vandalism. Just explaining myself!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hybrid seraph (talk • contribs) 05:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I looked at the reference that said elgooG was accessible from behind Chinese national network firewalls. It's dated 2002, and since a lot has happened since then, I am actually personally curious as to whether or not what the article says is still true. Also, elgooG is indeed up, though hosted by a German site: http://elgoog.rb-hosting.de/index.cgi?dir=/&page=/webhp%3Fhl=en Ecthelion83 (talk) 03:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How accurate is the information? 

message: Google hasn't been banned for a very long time. There was that fiasco when Google refused to renew its license to operate, but at no point within the last few years was Google ever banned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shimo1989 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2002? 

message: I keep getting messages that my IP adress will be banned because I vandalised this page. I'm a 55-year-old man, I did not do that and would appreciate it if I wasn't blamed for things I didn't do!! 69.171.164.0 (talk) 01:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: somebody using your ip address might be doing vandalism. try making an account.103.130.91.2 (talk) 07:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I didn't do the vandalism! 

message: There is only source which supports a single paragraph, and apparently the boldfaced comment suggests that fact is no longer true. It's been more than two years since the AfD, and nothing has been improved nor has there been additional coverage. This no longer deserves a standalone article. Daniel Case (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I repaired and updated the article after researching the subject. Right now I think it contains no serious errors or outdated information. It's up to you what to did with it now (if you wanna merge, delete, etc). Personally I think its only value is as a small historical piece of information; even though there are also still a few elgooG sites out there (probably a trivial fact). Wawawemn (talk) 14:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: What exactly is "Jeremy Powell" doing above the infobox? Still waiting for Elgoog Spam (=Google Maps) btw …  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 黄雨伞 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: . --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 20:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wtf? 

message: The site now seems to list a bunch of "easter eggs" which are google themed or originated (but are now gone) from Google. I added a section to account for this, although it needs a better rewrite by someone with some writing skill. But more importantly, I think the entire article could do with an update, since it seems severely outdated. I'm not in the position to do so, and from a cursory search there aren't many webpages that talk about elgoog recently, and I don't want to overstep into own research territory, so I'm not going to try to update the page any further than I have. 2A00:23C4:E48D:5600:F0C8:9929:4A18:B283 (talk) 20:21, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs update to reflect slightly different purpose 

message: The website doesn't seem to be owned by Google or all to flat, can someone fix this? Consider reaching out to the owners of alltoflat (halibut@alltooflat.com) and elgoog.com (admin@elgoog.im). User1042 (talk) 21:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Who said the website was owned by Google? The lead clearly says  InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't seem to be owned by Google or All to Flat 

message: " The manner in which elgooG came into possession of these Easter eggs is unclear, although the site claims to "restore, discover and also create interactive Google Easter eggs"."
This unsourced sentence doesn’t really make any sense to include. A developer recreating or downloading assets from Google isn't really witchcraft or worth mentioning in this way at all. I'd say remove the whole sentence. JonasTisell (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird sentence 

message: Despite my votes in the 2011 AFD, I feel the subject no longer meets notability. I found no coverage of elgooG whatsoever after the initial "it was used to circumvent censorship in China" buzz from back in the day. Since then, the site has gone under entirely outside a jokey mirror. Most of the content after that is WP:COATRACK information about the actual Google mirroring its site as a joke. Pinging  from the 2011 AFD for their thoughts. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability