lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mitra Tabrizian

message: This is her second article. The first reached this stage (only visible if you have admin superpowers). User:Zadoc, whose only en:WP edits are these two, first deleted the date of birth and country of origin (without giving any reason) and then blanked the page (ditto). User:NewEnglandYankee then reversed Zadoc's edits. Finally, User:David.Monniaux deleted the article, commenting no sources, no evidence of notability, complained to Foundation => killed as per WP:BLP.
The article that DM deleted neither mentioned any exhibition nor said that MT was a teacher; instead, it just said that "her work" (where? for whom?) was of this or that kind. It was reasonable to comment that the article presented no evidence of notability. Plus it was indeed unreferenced.
It appears to me that the new article asserts notability. And the assertions are (vaguely) referenced, too.
Beats me how Baudrillard and Lyotard could "inspire" anything other than drowsiness, but that's a different matter..... Hoary (talk) 03:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The subject is legit, but the references obviously need further work - I merely added what I found ready to hand. Yes, the mention of Baudrillard and Lyotard seems more damning than impressive... but that's what passes for inspiring within a sizable part of academe... Pinkville (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This is her second article

message: I removed the birth date. it had been supported by a reference to a source but that source has removed the date.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate
Talk:Biscuit Tortoni

message: Why is this called "Biscuit" Tortoni?  I have never seen that before, it has always been just plain "Tortoni" at any of the Italian restaurants I have ever had this delicious variant of ice cream.
OK, I just did a Google search and apparently "Biscuit Tortoni" is a thing. Although I cannot yet find an explanation of Biscuit Tortoni vs. plain old Tortoni. If I find an explanation of what's going on, I will revisit this topic here.  :-\
For the record, I consider tortoni to be as good or better than spumoni or Italian gelato. :)
And yes, I realize that compared to global warming, global pandemic, and the rise of global fascism, this is a minor tiddlybob in the cosmic scheme of things, but I do want to know what's going on. Tortoni is my favorite ice cream, hard to find, perhaps I'm on a quest to make it for myself. Any thoughts? lol  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6EB0:80E0:C1E:7F06:C08D:876D (talk) 23:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  what??
Template talk:Infobox beryllium

message: Speed of sound in beryllium is probably a record for solids, and I have a reference for the 12870 m/sec in thin rods at r.t. (room temp). I have no idea where the other value given is from, or what the n means. So I've deleted it.  SBHarris 02:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed of sound
Talk:Butter Brickle

message: Who did what? It states that Butter Brickle was a chocolate covered toffee produced by the John G. Woodward & Co. In the same sentence more info is given about toffee pieces made by Fenn. Did Fenn produce the toffee used by the makers of the candy bar? OR Did Fenn buy the process, so to speak, from JGW&Co. and begin to produce the toffee? I think I know the answer, but do not want to assume it's correct, do an edit and add something that is incorrect. Thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 16:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Lead (to this reader) 

message: While it is an interesting read, the quote doesn't have very much to do with the topic of the article, namely the Butter Brickle candy bar. Would like some input before removing. Thoughts? THX1136 (talk) 17:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large quote in article
Talk:Butter pecan

message: Popular Culture: "Isn't It Romantic?"
Blake : Butter pecan.
Natalie : What? Who likes butter pecan? What's wrong with you?
Blake : That's what I thought would happen.
Natalie : You're like an eighty-year-old grandpa. Okay, what's your second favorite ice cream flavor?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drsruli (talk • contribs) 09:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Choc ice

message: I'm not fond of that passage about how March 3 is being increasingly celebrated as Choc Ice Day and the founders of Choc Ice Day want it to become as big as Pancake Day. Are there any claims to March 3 actually being celebrated somewhere as Choc Ice Day?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinderlei (talk • contribs) 16:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been removed some time between then and now ... 77.96.249.228 (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choc Ice Day 

message: The whole "racism" portion of the page seems to be quite unimportant. There's one instance in which someone calls someone else a "Choc Ice", and that's about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.123.39.243 (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: comment Thanks for discussing your proposed change. Please have a look at WP:BRD - Bold, Revert. Discuss: you have been Bold, I have Reverted you, and now we are Discussing it. Please don't make the change again in the meantime or people may feel that you are edit-warring. Thanks 77.96.249.228 (talk) 22:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

text: I've raised this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Discrimination and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink. With a bit of luck there'll be interested editors along to help discuss it. Fwiw I'm unsure myself. It does seem perhaps a bit undue emphasis at present but maybe needs mentioning briefly? Oreo does this quite well and has a good internal link, but it's probably a much more well-known usage. I'm not planning on making a big fight out of this either way. I'd just rather see the removal of referenced content discussed first. Consensus, and all that. :) Cheers 213.205.251.29 (talk) 08:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Also added at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink/Desserts task force. 77.96.249.228 (talk) 23:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racism
Talk:Karl Kaspar von der Leyen

message: The second part of the name was wrong. Please look here: http://www.landeshauptarchiv.de/index.php?id=334 -- Spurzem (talk) 11:41, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Hokey pokey (ice cream)

message: Edited article to remove reference to "solid toffee" in New Zealand Hokey Pokey ice cream. Tip-Top's Classic Hokey Pokey ice cream uses sponge toffee (Tip-Top's ingredient listhttp://www.tiptop.co.nz/our_brands.asp?category_id=3#2ltubs includes sodium bicarbonate - not an ingredient in hard toffee).
PeterJaquiery (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --Giovanni Rastrelli (talk) 11:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: In what way can a flavour of icecream be called a "standard example of Kiwiana"?Royalcourtier (talk) 21:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kiwiana? 

message: I am pretty sure I can go buy some Hokey Pokey icecream and take photos of just the contents of Hokey Pokey icecream and put them to Wikimedia Commons. I suppose we could still use the fair use image in the case of showing exported Hokey Pokey icecream, but I think we should give it some free alternatives elsewise too. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free alternative?
Talk:Canon EF-S 10–22mm lens

message: The text "The lens' angle of view is equivalent to a 16-35 mm on a 35 mm camera" should be deleted. The lens is an EF-S mount. A 10-22mm EF-S lens is equavelent to a 10-22mm EF lens on a full frame camera. There is no crop factor.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.83.148.222 (talk • contribs) 
:That would be incorrect. The EF-S mount lenses always report the focal length that the glass provides, which would be 10mm-20mm, the crop still exists. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-10-22mm-f-3.5-4.5-USM-Lens-Review.aspx -J.reed (talk) 06:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the "similar lenses" section, the Nikon lens could be seperated better from the other lenses, since it is of course not available in EF(-S) mount.  Also there is now a Nikon 10-24mm DX, which would be a better comparison.  87.160.132.140 (talk) 12:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  10-22mm vs 16-35mm FOV 

message: Should image stabilization be changed to "yes"? I thought that all EF-S lenses had lens stabalization?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.137.241.81 (talk) 14:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the EF-S 10-22mm does not have image stabilization. Nebrot (talk) 16:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  image stailizer
Talk:Ice cream bar

message: Is "some crunchy goodness" really encyclopedic?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.168.39.41 (talk) 04:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: pedantic

message: But why, exactly, do we have this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.80.30.60 (talk) 13:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm usually the last one to question notability... 

message: The photo in this article shows a child eating a fudgesicle--which does not contain ice cream. 
Can it be changed to show a true ice cream bar (typically vanilla ice cream covered with a chocolate covering)? Like this: https://www.drumstick.com/assets/images/products/photos/eskimo-pie-milk-chocolate-small.jpg BillDeeUS (talk) 23:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo  

message: This article should be merged with Eskimo Pie.
10:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: The Eskimo Pie article is clearly about a specific brand of ice cream bar rather than ice cream bars in general. –WPA (talk) 23:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Oppose the merge. --Maumivi (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed, given the opposition and no support. Klbrain (talk) 08:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Eskimo Pie
Talk:Party of the Reconstruction of the National Order

message: Pages about brazilian politics in english wikipedia have been falling victim of one of the largest cases of sockpuppetry in the history of wikipedia.
The now perma-Banned User:SacredGeometry333 created hundreds to even thousands of sockpuppet accounts to disrupt and vandalize wikipedia with clear political goals,as according to some evaluations made by administrators,he is a right-wing militant.
We encourage ,based on the principles of impartiality and transparency,user to track down suspected sockpuppets of this account and report it to the administrators.
Sockpuppetry is unacceptable in the wikipedia and should not be tolerated at any cost.  Araukan (talk) 00:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sockpuppetry by SacredGeometry333
Talk:Max Sedlmeyer

message: Sedlmayr, Sedlmeyer, or Sedlmayer as on the Polish version? I think we should be told. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: German Wikipedia has an article on their climb, instead of stubs on the individual climbers. Could the Max Sedlmeyer and Karl Mehringer artcles be merged? Then interwiki links to the German article would be straightforward. G2905 (talk) 16:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Wikipedia - article on the climb
Talk:Raspberry ripple

message: Potential sources:
* Telegraph story (references this article!)
* Margaret Thatcher - inventor of raspberry ripple ice cream (or not)
* Maggie again
Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 23:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

message: Regarding the insertion made by 197.34.98.23 today: the rhyming slang definition is nothing to do with the topic of the article – we don't talk about feet in the article on plate or stairs in apple (see Rhyming slang). It could, I guess, go in the wiktionary definition wikt:Raspberry ripple.  —SMALLJIM  19:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

text: What's your policy/guideline reference for this opinion?  —SMALLJIM  19:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  In popular culture is used when the entity the article is referring to is referred to elsewhere, not when the term is blindly applied for something that is slang. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. See, among others, Mae West, where - in the in popular culture section - her name is used for a plethora of unrelated items. 197.34.98.23 (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that's interesting. There is the issue of balance, however. The mention in Mae West is a tiny proportion of the entire article, whereas in Raspberry Ripple, it amounts to nearly half the content. Overall, I'm not really interested in arguing about nipples and puddings right now. I'm inclined to leave it alone, even though there is a small consensus against you. Incidentally, are you going to try to add feet to plate (dishware) and so on, as above?  —SMALLJIM  20:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps we should try to make the article longer in the ice-creamier parts, then... 197.34.98.23 (talk) 20:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

text: This is crazy. Its use in rhyming slang is a noteworthy part of the term in popular culture in the anglosphere. Comparing page hits for the term as icecream and slang shows this. There is ample precedent for citing a term's use in rhyming slang in entries: e.g. Barnet Fair, Ruby Murray, stitching awl, J. Arthur Rank and many more.  Furthermore, had you taken more care when editing, you would have noticed that you reverted an unrelated edit. Please take greater care when editing (for avoidance of doubt, I am 197.34.98.23 although the IP address has changed). 197.34.107.24 (talk) 09:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhyming slang 

message: Don't have an edit war here! Remember the options for dispute resolution. I'm not going to take part further.  —SMALLJIM  10:06, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:EW]]
Talk:Kazuhiro Kiuchi

message: As best I can tell, Kazuhiro Kiuchi the mangaka and Kazuhiro Kiuchi the director at the same person, but it is difficult to confirm this from English sources. If they aren't, then they were both involved in the Be-Bop High School OVAs, causing even more confusion. Someone should probably check Japanese sources, starting with the Wikipedia article on both him and the Kodansha Manga Award. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity
Talk:Rainer Hönisch

message: 1936 is wrong, he won his titles in 1975-1985. Maybe 1959-01-21 is OK  
85.199.76.176 (talk) 06:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year 1936
Talk:University of Kinshasa

message: I propose that University of Lovanium be merged into University of Kinshasa. As both articles note, the university started as the University of Lovanium and became University of Kinshasa. Their entries are currently nearly identical.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NhInsideWriter (talk • contribs) 03:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Ernst Graf zu Reventlow

message: the dates given in the intro and 3rd paragraph are different.Toyokuni3 (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date
Talk:Urbanus Rhegius

message: I don't understand the meaning of the section "Life"--the wording is confusing and appears garbled.  For example, who studied in these places--Rhegius or his father?  And Johann Eck is a person, not a place, so one can't study "at Johannes Eck."Kit1066 (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dag (name)

message: Articles like John have every possible variant thought of (John, Hans, Juan, Jean, Sean, Shawn, Shane, Johann) and this is common for all the Hebrew (Afro-Asiatic language group) names, but for some reason names with their origin in Indo-European languages do not yet have the same treatment on Wikipedia! Shouldn't other names related to mean "day" meaning sky or related to Dyeus / Jove / Zeus / Tusito be added? Wouldn't the name Dion fall into this category? I'm sure there are many others from slavic variants and more that were common names. 4.255.54.186 (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants throughout Indo-European languages
Talk:Dissected plateau

message: This article should stand as is; it is a legitimate geologic term that sees use. I'm now linking to it directly. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 03:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Legit article

message: This is a very small article and there's a lot more to be said on the subject (and if you don't think so then you're just not a Geologist!). Also, we need an image that really shows us what these places look like. A couple or three pictures would be good. Gingermint (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little and it needs another picture 

message: I think that a plateau is actually a flats piece of land in a forest what I mean by this is that plateaus or not usually I sucked it but they are consumed and decomposed this means that they are eroded and wore down they are also chipped away over time 96.232.232.241 (talk) 00:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi 

message: Where is dessected plateau is located 72.255.37.122 (talk) 08:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is dessected plateau is located
Talk:Telephone numbers in South Korea

message: Someone is changing "011 - Mobile (LG Telecom, 2G until 2003)", "019 - Mobile (SK Telecom, 2G until 2003)" (true) to "011 - Mobile (SK Telecom, 2G until 2003)", "019 - Mobile (LG Telecom, 2G until 2003)" (false)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cluebot (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandal problem 

message: I tried calling 1339. That number does not exist, apparently. But that might be because I don't live in Seoul?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.105.182.40 (talk) 23:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information
Talk:Battle of Tangtou–Guocun

message: WPArkansas Bot has assessed this article for WikiProject China per another WikiProject's assessment. If you disagree with this assessment, feel free to change it. If the bot made an error, please leave a message at Coffee's talk page. --WPArkansas Bot (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject China Assessment
Talk:Bob Dean

message: I've been looking for more citations/info - I know there were a few indepth articles around the time of his death, and there was also an autobiography he wrote shortly before his death, but that seems to have been a very small local press - book has been impossible to find. Hoping to add more info soon if I can find the Canadian newspaper articles. 2603:8001:2A00:7428:50FF:5957:8A56:3C3A (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for more material/citation
Talk:Mongolian nobility

message: * Khaan - хаан
* Jinong - жонон
* Chinsang - чинсан
* Daichin - дайчин
* Boshgotu - бошгот
* Taizung - тайзун
* Taishi - тайши
* Uizeng - үйзэн
* Zaisang - зайсан
* Taiji - тайж
* Tusalagchi - туслагч
* Zahiragchi - захирагч
* Meireng - мэйрэн
* Zalang - залан
* Zanggi - занги
* Hunde - хүнд
* Boshgo - бошго
It seems some govt posts that could be occupied by commoners have been confused with noble titles. But I keep this list here for future refenrences. Gantuya eng (talk) 04:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for this table. This ladder seems at some places different from what I learned about the titles used for the Mongolian nobles. I don't know what šidzi and jangdzi were. I thought ǰanggi was the name of a military post. What is "kesig"? Is it "soum" in Mongolia? Soums were administered by ǰanggi. Also frontier stations were commanded by ǰanggi. Are you sure that the titles used by the Manchu nobles were completely identical to the titles used by the Mongol nobles? Were all these titles used throughout the Qing Empire or only in Mongolia and by the Manchus? Gantuya eng (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

text: That's listed here Mongolian nobility#Mongol Empire Gantuya eng (talk) 03:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 15-17th centuries "Feudal ladder" as listed in some sources
Talk:Bentalls

message: I have removed the mention of suicide-jumpers - "Bentalls is popular amongst many shoppers and suicide-jumpers." as this just seems to be a crass comment added after the sad death of a young woman yesterday. AndrewJFulker (talk) 12:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Drop it? - yes - it is a sad and unfortunate incident but it does not need to be recorded on a world-wide encyclopedia. There are, for example, several thousand road accidents a year. Wikipedia is not an ongoing news source and such accidents are only relevant to an encyclopaedia if the individual concerned is notable in Wikipedia terms. Motmit (talk) 18:55, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi. An ip editor changed the page stating it was out of date and now Fenwicks. I reversed it back and changed it to was, as it has been rebranded. However I cannot exactly find when. It was still Bentalls at the beginning on 2022, which was the last mention in the press, but actually no ref anywhere confirming the changeover date, so put as 2023.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 11:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bentalls rebranded to Fenwick
Talk:Greg Barns

message: The article says Greg Barns was disendorsed, but doesn't say why. I believe it was because he made comments opposing the Government's handling of the MV Tampa affair. It would be interesting to know what Greg Barns said, with some quotes.Lester 05:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tampa

message: I have commenced a Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:36, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Category talk:Eguor Wikipedians

message: It isn't kicking someone while their down to cite their behavior as "what not to do", it's simply a way to learn from what has happened here before. 
It's just the way this site works, new users should be able to see what the community means when they say someone is being disruptive. Anynobody 05:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh. BabyDweezil's intent was not to be disruptive. She was banned for being disruptive because that is how it appeared to unsympathetic parties. Not worth a big fight, though, just a bit uncharitable on your part (and here it is Christmas!) --JustaHulk (talk) 06:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unhelpful editors get blocked/banned 

message: The eguor description reads very good.TCO (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  smells like integrity
Talk:2009 SEA Games

message: Can someone please return the criticism  section with refernces  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zuanzuanfuwa (talk • contribs) 14:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed the citation needed part which is still lack of ref after long time. Grenouille vert (talk) 05:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This link has nothing that can be cited as reference for the criticism? So I still delete the section which is unreferenced. Grenouille vert (talk) 06:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: Should we add this somewhere in the article? 71.177.75.140 (talk) 07:11, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More

message: This is just a reminder that material from other websites should not be copied and pasted directly into the article, but rather it should be read, understood, and condensed in an original manner. Aside from the obvious copyright issues of copying, the tone of the writing will obviously not match that intended for an encyclopaedia. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)Join WikiProject Athletics! 10:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copying sources 