lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jiroft

message: the location of Jiroft in this picture is wrong,please tell me how i can correct it, how can i upload another map?
:Either that, or just fix the current one yourself (with photoshop or something), and then re-upload it. Just be careful: The image is actually pertaining to kerman, not Jiroft. So you might wanna upload it under another name.--Zereshk 14:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Apparently, Art Newsletter in the Jan. 2001 edition reported that the rich archaeological site was extensively and systematically looted by locals over the preceding year.  See also www.bradtguides.com/destinations/.../background-information.html. Kdammers (talk) 20:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  looting 

message: Scientists digging in Jiroft claim that the Jiroft culture was more important than Mesopotamia back then. Yet other scientists pretty much put it on the back burner. --Indiana-Jack Hunter (talk) 14:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  As relevant as Mesopotamia ? 

message: "manuscripts obtained from this civilization are before the cuneiform discovered in Mesopotamia" 
Who claims that? And do you mean clay tablets? 2A0C:5A81:6203:8C00:FC24:5A7F:580A:8578 (talk) 10:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manuscripts?
Talk:Cadence (cycling)

message: The following comments were added to Cadence (cycling) by annonymus user 82.198.250.18 without any edit summary and without any source references. I'll happily Wikify them and put them back in the article if suitable references can be produced. Oops, forgot to sign myself Murray Langton 15:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced comments
Talk:Chet Lam

message: The link in "Quotes" doesn't work. Can someone correct this? =) 58.168.167.29 10:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes

message: Is his full name "Chet Lam Yat Fung"?  Should the article be moved?  And which is his patronymic (or last name)?  And are the references provided in the "Personal life" section in Chinese?  I've added that they are, but am a racist westerner that can't tell some languages apart.  Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: About his name, "Lam Chet" is his pseudonym while "Lam Yat Fung" is the full name. "Chet Lam Yat Fung" is completely inappropriate in either traditions since pen name and full name should not be combined to address someone. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 02:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Lam Chet" or "Chet Lam"? I guess I'm confused as to what should be the name of the article and how he should be referred to in the article. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 06:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lam is the last name.  Chet is the English name.  Lam yat fung is the cantonese romanization of his Chinese name.  The article should be at Chet Lam, since that is the real English name.  Benjwong (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 
Category talk:Higher education in New Zealand

message: It seems somewhat over zealous to have a list of stubs, a category of Universities and Colleges, and a further category for colleges. Would it not be more appropriate to have a Tertiary education category; the stubs could fit within the individual uni's (and in any case anyone looking for a particular college only has to do a search, and would be more likely to do that!) Ianguy 10:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also a :Category:Tertiary Education Institute in New Zealand! However, one needs to be careful about the word college in the New Zealand educational context. A college often denotes a secondary (year 9-13) school rather than a university. -- Cameron Dewe 07:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 April 3#Category:Tertiary Education Institute in New Zealand which is relevant to this category.-gadfium 19:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category discussion
Talk:Paweł Nastula

message: :Original title spelled incorrectly. Moved w/o discussion. Kafziel 17:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chiam See Tong

message: It seems to me that pretty much all of the 2006 election section is NPOV / a campaign advertisement.  A couple of lines might be salvageable, but I'm not even sure of that.  I propose to delete the section, unless it's cleaned up or a case can be made for its retention. Colonel Tom 10:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted by another editor. Colonel Tom 02:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: his career from 2002 onwards, per the article, does not make sense. what in the world is '(advocates & solicitors)'? does it merely refer to his profession? it sounds as though it is his firm. Chensiyuan 04:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: career

message: Is it necessary to display a list of parliamentary committee membership in Chiam See Tong's wiki entry? This list seem quite long. I think it should be either removed or edited to a shorter list. Please advise. Kimberry352 (talk) 03:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parliamentary Committee Membership 
Talk:Scottish Junior Cup

message: Those who have done other junior teams need to add the links (I have done Blantyre Vics) Ianguy 11:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Needs to be updated semi final changed to one game at neutral ground 2A00:23C8:7204:CA01:2C05:E13A:B032:821A (talk) 08:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks. Boothy m (talk) 13:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi Final
Talk:Bu'ale

message: I was just browsing around and happened to come to this page. I noticed that it was heavily advertising the town, and perhaps particular Somali factions and/or warlords. The article needs some cleanup and perhaps a rewrite.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nogburt (talk • contribs) 03:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertizing problem 
Talk:Herbert A. Littleton

message: I am giving this article a B-class assessment not for length, but based on an assumption of completeness. If the article can be expanded, please do. LordAmeth 14:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment
Talk:Howe and Hummel

message: Could someone please provide an explanation for why this article is in :Category:American criminals? That category is for individuals, not companies (or in this case law firms). Howe and Hummel, as far as I can tell, are now the only firm included in the category. Furthermore, the article does not state that Howe and Hummel were ever convicted of a crime. Nor does it state that they were ever arrested, charged, or investigated. I have read the NYT obituaries for Howe and Hummel and they  were not labelled as "criminals" by the NYTimes. In fact, Mr. Howe was called "the last in a long line of distinguished criminal lawyers". I am concerned about the possible misuse of certain categories here. Unless they were convicted of crimes, rather than defenders of criminals, I do not believe this law firm should be included in the category. -- JJay 11:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: Happy to do so - Howe and Hummel were - in general opinion of the time, certainly, and in Hummel's case, legally - crooks as much as simply lawyers. The pair conspired to pervert the course of justice in numerous murder trials, and Hummel blackmailed many of the leading men in the city on behalf of his clients. Sources include the Rovere biography noted in the article, Luc Sante's book Low Life, and Morton's Gangland: The Lawyers, the Rovere work being based on lawyers' lore and interviews with men in the legal profession who were H&H's contemporaries, and latter two being referenced works drawn in part from contemporary newspapers, books and pamphlets. Hummel was also the subject of an article by Arthur Train, late of the New York DA's office, discussed here . Hummel's conviction, which led him being disbarred and sentenced to serve several years in jail on Blackwell's Island, was for suborning perjury. I need to expand the article and mention this in more detail - it was a complicated case. Mikedash 12:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminals?
Template talk:MobyGames developer

message: I think this template is very valuable and I use it often.  To make it even more useful, how about adding the word "profile" to it?  So instead of writing "John Romero's profile" for the name parameter, we could just write "John Romero" and have the template add in "'s profile".  About 80 articles use the template, so it wouldn't be too big a deal to fix them all.  What does everyone else think? — Frecklefoot | Talk 14:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as you can optionally override it for disambiguated article names, e.g. Scott Adams (game designer), sounds fine. --Quiddity 22:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How about adding "profile"
Talk:Safari Rally

message: I've added in as much as I could for the list of previous winners, but there's still plenty of gaps for the results prior to 1970. It'd be excellent if we could find a source for the missing info.
DeLarge 11:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have quoted verbatim from the 1989 Official Safari Rally Souvenir Book Published by the then Safari Rally Ltd. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GurjiB (talk • contribs) 8 July 2006.
:Thanks for any extra info you may have, but could you cite sources if your list of previous winners conflicts with existing infomation. Also, could you take care not to wipe out existing Wikilinks? -- DeLarge 19:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Information edited is correct 

message: It was also awarded.  185.18.60.191 (talk) 17:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ladies' Cup 

message: This page needs better photos! Turini2 (talk) 18:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Roman naming conventions/to do

message: Shouldn't this be called "roman naming conventions for males" since there is a "roman naming conventions for females" page? 
Unfinished tasks as of 1 June 2006
*There should be references and inline citations as indicated in the criteria. 
*Some sections are too short.
*Sources are in inappropriate format.
Finished tasks:
*this page would benefit greatly if the examples were split off into either seperate lists or sent to Wiktionary. 
**Roman Tribe names now at List of Roman Tribes.
**Female names now at List of Roman Female Names.
**Agnomen are integrated and link added.
***Lists are removed.Rrpbgeek 20:44, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Homecoming of Beorhtnoth Beorhthelm's Son

message: "This fragment tells the story of the aftermath of the defeat of the English in the aforementioned battle."
This above is from an earlier version of the article. It should be checked and restored to an appropriate point in the article. It is also in the "external links" section. Carcharoth 11:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old reference from earlier version 

message: An old version had the following sections that could be restored if needed, though they need content added to them (they were just headers at the time):
==Plot==
==Tolkien Variations on Old English==
==References==



I also removed the "poetry stub" and "no context" templates, as the article seems adequate now. Carcharoth 12:54, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More old stuff 

message: The Reference to ofermod could point to several relevant places, which can be found by Goggling "ofermod" and clicking on "ofermod Tolkien." Instead, it points, irrelevantly, to an obscure Swedish rock band. (Perhaps I'm the only person in the world who has not heard of this band: if so,  I owe someone an apology. Otherwise, otherwise.
Donfbreed2 (talk) 05:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Spurious Link
Talk:The Devotchkas

message: All female NY punks 'The Devotchkas' are not to be confused with 'DeVotchKa' which is a self-described "eastern bloc indie rock band" from Colorado who are currently touring with Dreden Dolls. DjDrAkiraGonzo 11:54, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the link to the krays is not right. i changed the link to (non-existent) The Krays (Band) Ibotty 13:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the krays (punk band) link 
Talk:Geomancer (novel)

message: Holy mother, that's a huge chunk of text. - Taillen (triune forum)
L - M - A - O - ! Sid 16:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Keurusselkä

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox? 
Talk:Karikkoselkä

message: congratulations to all editors of this article Gnangarra 02:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Promotion
Talk:Texas Ranch House

message: The block that re-lists all the participants in the series is redundant.- Then change it--71.118.82.241 12:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The standard TV series info box has a listing for executive producer(s), not series producers.  In the future, on the occassion that you feel an article needs changes, feel free to introduce them yourself.  Wikipedia is, after all, a participatory media project.
Sangrito 07:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On changes
Talk:Gharb-Chrarda-Béni Hssen

message: Can anyone provide a transliteration of the region's Arabic name?  Skinsmoke (talk) 15:43, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Paranormal/Archive 2

message: The challenges I listed were a good place to start being material for this topic.  But apparently, some waste of space (a gremlin?) has self-assigned their meaningless self to sabotage our efforts and deleted my contributions.  I assume it's their way of fabricating potent into their life.  StarHeart 02:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved here from NEWS! on project page

message: Why did you delete my comment? I am trying to help this project, having gotten involved with the astrology articles lately - I realize you may not agree with me, but that should be a reason to address our differences, not censor me out of the project. I would still very much like to know the opinions of other people involved, with regards to how paranormal phenomenon should be reported. Lundse 07:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Bleddyn ap Cynfyn

message: What sort of social rank would one have to bear in their family, in order to be a descendent of either?  
How far up the totem pole, would you say?  
This is intended to have broad answers and based on gradients of time and population, not going into specifics about exact descendents.  About how common is their descent in the English or British genepool today?  
I've noticed that American Presidents don't descend from either king, but the most common recent royal ancestor shared by many of us is Edward III.  How common is it for anybody in the English or British genepool, to have a Protestant royal ancestor?  
There is a general cutoff, isn't there?  
Is it because of fratricide in the Wars of the Roses, the Tudors' "new men", or the Union of the Crowns, or the parliamentary union under Queen Anne (I can't think of any non-royal family descent from the Hanoverians within the UK)?  
I'm thinking that there is a big difference between Plantagenet and Tudor descents, that the commons in all likelihood have the former and the latter is held by the lords.  (just generally speaking)  Then again, Tudor descent in the Welsh must be higher in general.  I am further curious about pre-Royal Tudor blood in Anglo-British people today, since the status and/or concept of Welsh royalty/nobility is rather hazy in my mind.  I found the Blevins aka Ap Bleddyn family of Powys in my ancestry, but have no real idea on what to make of it--or any other Welsh "native aristocracy".  I might be able to find Stewart descent somewhere, from way back when.  What percentage of Hanoverian background do you think that German colonists had in America?  
On the British side, I have to go as far back as Welf himself...but any recent genetic relationship with the Hanoverians or the counts of Nassau are completely obscure.  How does one research those other colonial people, such as the Hessians?  
UK genealogy is relatively easy when focusing on English (and French) ancestries.  What would a "national person" of Jerusalem (or Antioch, for example) in Crusader times be known as?  
We say "American" for those Founders, but was there such a nationality-term for the Crusaders in their own domains?  
I guess the term is supposed to be Levantine/Outremer, or "Crusader" as our national heritage says "Colonist"...
IP Address 12:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descendents of Edward IV and Henry VII 
Talk:Mechanised corps (Soviet Union)

message: There is a lot of duplication between this article and Tank Corps (Soviet).  Would it be a good idea to merge them? Balcer 12:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The duplication is intentional at this stage, and only affects the pre-war section.  They were separate formation types, and I think warrant their own articles, so I think they should not be merged.  Ideally, there should be an article on the development of Soviet armoured doctrine containing most of the pre-war section, with these two articles only containing relevant info.  Not sure if I am the right person to draft the overall doctrine article though. Andreas 12:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Can you think of a good title for a general article?  We could at least create a stub for it, and let it grow from there. Balcer 13:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this one should do Deep_operations Andreas 13:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good start, but I wonder if we don't also need something broader and under a more general title.  Maybe Soviet Armor Doctrine, or something along those lines, that would cover developments in the whole 1918-1991 span (one possible reference is here).  Deep operations is really a doctrine that existed only in the 1930s, and it actually died, so to speak, with the officers executed during the Great Purge. Of course various elements of it were used by the Red Army during the war and afterwards, but properly speaking it was not the same thing, in my opinion at least.  Balcer 14:06, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that pre- and post-war developments are probably quite separate, and to try to shoehorn Soviet military doctrine into a single article spanning 1917-1991 is probably not going to be practical (just consider the impact of nuclear weapons on the battlefield).  In the meantime, I think describing the concept of Deep Operations (of which the armoured doctrine is a subset) in more depth should be a good start.  It is important to divide the operational from the tactical doctrine.  Tanks had their own tactics, but within operations their doctrine is invariably (and in my view inseparably) part of the overall doctrine.  So an armoured doctrine article would be tactical, while the role of armour in operations needs to be discussed in the context of operational doctrine, i.e. Deep Battle/Operations, pre-1941. Andreas 14:14, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, let's develop Deep operations first and see where that goes. Balcer 14:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication and Doctrine

message: I think a better translation for "Automated Armoured" would be simply the conventional name Armoured (or is that mechanized?).  —Michael Z. 2006-05-09 21:31 Z
:I have seen this translated as "Armoured Car and Tank".  Balcer 22:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have often seen 'mechanized' used in German translations of Soviet officer memoirs. Andreas 06:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: See also [[GABTU]].
Talk:Bell YFM-1 Airacuda

message: Not bad, but a nit-pick:-
The Auxiliary power unit isn't Auxiliary at all as it supplies all the powere on the aircraft ALL the time (or not if it goes U/S). Is there another term to use for this form of power supply?Petebutt (talk) 06:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Auxiliary doesn't mean temporary, it just means, in this case, power that isn't for primary locomotion. Auxiliary power unit is the right term. Binksternet (talk) 15:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Aux power
Talk:Marquess of Lansdowne

message: why isn't the courtesy title Earl of Wycombe - surely that's the most senior Earldom as it's not Irish? Is it fear of being associated with High Wycombe?? Petsco 12:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hard to be certain but probably because it is a longstanding title - remember the 1223 barony is also kerryAlci12 16:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Rayment's House of Commons page suggests that the 2nd Marquess used "Earl Wycombe" as a courtesy title. That precedes the inheritance of the Earldom of Kerry, of course. Choess 19:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well they fit together, as soon as an older titles was available they used it. Of course you can never eliminate whim on the part of individualsAlci12 19:55, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:She's Come Undone

message: I recently added the following information to this page substantiated by an interview with Wally Lamb conducted in December of 2008. 
Wally Lamb has reported that the rights to the movie version of She's Come Undone have been purchased by Warner Brothers and that, at one time, Reese Witherspoon was attached to the project. Asked about the prospect of the movie being created Lamb wrote: "They are still viable projects but a lot of years have gone by and I don't know if they will ever be made."Loaded Questions Interview with author Wally Lamb.
I would like to argue that this information, about the future of Lamb's novel in a movie format as cited directly form the author is pertinent and should be allowed to remain on this page.
It should be noted that I have conducted some of the interview on this site, Loaded Questions. It should, however, also be noted that Loaded Questions does not sell any product nor does it stand to gain by having information pertinent to Mr. Lamb's career or novels shared with Wikipedia.
KellyHewitt80 (talk) 18:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In reviewing this suggestion it should be noted that the user above operates the blog/interview site being used as a reference. - MrOllie (talk) 18:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information About Theatrical Future of Book
Talk:Nazz

message: Just heard a a segment on XM where Todd Rundgren is talking about why they broke up and 3 times he refers to the band as The Nazz. That he brought a foriegn influence into The Nazz and so on... so whats the deal with that "mistakenly" part? Is that something from somewhere verifiable?
Did you pay attention to the article?  It clearly states that the band is known as "Nazz" on all official recordings and press materials.  I thought that settled the issue once and for all?  Todd was not the only member of the group.  You are beating a dead horse.  --70.58.82.115 (talk) 05:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2010

message: As far as I can tell, "Open My Eyes" wasn't the lead track on Nuggets, as we had it. According to the Nuggets article, it was track 5 on side 4; an image search for the album cover backs this up, although admittedly the only back-cover image I found was for the 1976 Sire reissue, not the original on Elektra. (It definitely wasn't the lead track on the Rhino single-LP reissue from the 80s—there it was side 2, track 5.) So I've removed this claim from the article; if someone has a source establishing that there was some version of Nuggets that led off with "Open My Eyes," please modify as appropriate. Danny oldsen (talk) 19:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Open My Eyes" on ''Nuggets'' 

message: I reworked this sentence - "It is unlikely that this did not at least subliminally influence the adoption of the name Nazz, even if the other citations are valid." - to reflect the original writer's intent. I am making the assumption that the intent was that it WAS possible that the construction company may have been a subliminal influence on the band's name choice. If this is in error, please feel free to revert.THX1136 (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit 