Talk:Indium tin oxide

message: This link to reuters is broken and I can't find a replacement.  Probably should remove it or cite it unlinked.
How about a picture and conductivity value? lysdexia 05:49, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: There have been rumors that the Sony Alpha series Digital Single-Lens Reflex cameras (DSLRs) as well as the Canon EOS 5D have a thin sheet of glass, coated with an extremely fragile and easily scratched / peeled / damaged ITO layer, sitting in front of their sensors' anti-alias filters.
It's speculated that the thin layer of glass might be an infrared-absorbing filter; furthermore, the ITO coating might act as a dielectric hot mirror, thus increasing the infrared rejection, and that the ITO layer's conductivity might help dissipate electrical charges and hence minimize the buildup of dust- and particle-attracting static electricity on the filter's surface.
Any confirmation as to whether ITO is indeed used by digital camera manufacturers, as well as its role (as a dichromatic interference filter and/or anti-static coating) would be appreciated, and could be usefully added to the "Applications" section of the main article. 213.224.83.4 17:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible digital camera applications 

message: anybody know regarding whether isopropyl alcohol reacts with the ito surface or not,and other concern is that is isopropyl alcohol modifies the surface chemistry of ito.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.212.4.240 (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  action of isopropyl alcohol on ito surface. 

message: In the appropriate section of the Zinc oxide article the ITO is mentioned as more "poisonous" than the oxide being discussed. Are there any references on this topic? --Esmu Igors (talk) 17:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazards 

message: I am not sure if this is the current place to request it - but AZO should have its own page -- even the zinc oxide page does not mention it. It is well established in the literature.-- --Wendsjinnit (talk) 04:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  AZO 

message: The first sentence in this section is highly questionable. ITO is not that expensive. Someone with more experience should provide a reference for that statement. Clearton11 (talk) 02:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constraints and trade-offs 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Indium tin oxide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090512004243/http://www.nano.gov/html/res/fy04-pdf/fy04%20-%20small%20parts/NNI_FY04_R_mode2_part8.pdf to http://www.nano.gov/html/res/fy04-pdf/fy04%20-%20small%20parts/NNI_FY04_R_mode2_part8.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indium tin oxide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726175305/http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/06/graphene-finally-goes-big.html to http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/06/graphene-finally-goes-big.html
*Added  tag to http://www.ncsu.edu/chemistry/franzen/public_html/sf/ito/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article doesn't give any history, like the year that it was first found or used.  That might be nice to know. Gah4 (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  year 

message: Should the article better explain the difference between (bulk) conductivity and sheet conductivity?  Often in thin layer materials, it is the latter that is important. Gah4 (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[sheet conductivity]] 

message: Seems to me that the discussion of alternative materials shouldn't be so highly featured in the article. It should be at the end, if it's there at all.
--however, some of the alternate materials are simply variants of ITO, which reasonably should be featured here. Geoffrey.landis (talk) 20:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  moving alternative materials down