Talk:Anne Seymour, Duchess of Somerset

message: Anne Stanhope is buried in the church at Shelford. Look at Nottinghamshire history site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.41.74.120 (talk • contribs) .
:Done, added source. Thank you for pointing that out! Petros471 12:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whomever put this into the article obviously watched too much of the Showtime show The Tudors. This statement is not true and is thus being taken out of the article, thank you. There were some rumours at the court of King Henry VIII about Anne. She was rumoured to sleep with many men, including Sir Francis Bryan and Thomas Seymour (her brother-in-law). She was also rumoured to have an illegitimate child, who was named Thomas, with Thomas Seymour. This is purely a fictitious story that was made up for the show, The Tudors. -- Lady Meg (talk) 09:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Statement 

message: Hi Surtsicna,
Since you're again revising the way in which Henry VIII's six wives are referred to on Wikipedia (as you did just now with this article), I'd like to draw to your attention the fact that the RS cited in the article has the title Queen Katherine Parr:
:Anthony Martienssen, Queen Katherine Parr, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, St. Louis, San Francisco, Düsseldorf, Mexico, 1973 
I refer to this because of the lengthy discussion recently at DYK in which you insisted that the use of Queen Anne Boleyn was impermissible on Wikipedia.
I don't want to get into that discussion again, and I don't object to the edit you made to this article, but I do feel you need to rethink your insistence that it is impermissible to refer to Henry VIII's six wives on Wikipedia as Queen Anne Boleyn, Queen Katherine Parr, etc., as reliable sources do routinely refer to them in that way, and if you wish to have Wikipedia refer to them otherwise, you need to get consensus for your version in the Wikipedia Manual of Style, as I said in the DYK discussion. NinaGreen (talk) 18:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen Katherine Parr 

message: Far be it for me to question the reference given - an obscure writer in the 19th century version of People Magazine - but how could Anne Stanhope be born in 1497 and have children born as late as 1552 in the absence of modern medicine? In fact, how did she manage to marry so late in life with the dowry she had? I suspect the 1845 writer mistook her for her aunt. 206.45.138.178 (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth

message: Tomb monument states she died aged 90 years (XC) on 16 April 1587 which would make her date of birth c. 1497 and not 1510. 2603:6000:A700:C73A:2D08:8172:8452:BCF1 (talk) 16:24, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: The article says that Anne bequeathed a piece of jewelry to her daughter in law, and the article names her as Katherine. However, Katherine had died years earlier, in 1568. When Anne died, that son was married to his second wife, Frances. 
"In her will Anne Seymour bequeathed to her "daughter of Hertford" (her daughter-in-law), Lady Katherine Grey, a fair tablet or locket "to wear with antique work on one side, and a rose of diamonds on the other"." 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:544F:E012:2320:EFE4 (talk) 00:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong daughter in law named in article