lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Backlash (2007)

message: I've brought this up before and a consensus was reached. The finish was highly unusual, as it involved two men hitting their finishers, and a third man getting the pin. "Cena pinned Orton after a Spear from Edge" does not really even begin to describe what happened. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 16:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO, it seems to be covered now since the Event section goes into more details. TJ Spyke 22:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm apparently brain dead today, sorry. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 22:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

text: That's Orton being pinned. Besides, YouTube is illegally hosting WWE content, thus making it unreliable. Anyway, Orton was down from a spear, so that is what should be noted; not the thing about Cena pinning Orton after Sweet Chin Music from Michaels? –LAX 02:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: HBK hitting the Superkick on Cena is listed in the event section. It does not need to be noted in the results. Sweet Chin Music had NOTHING whatsoever to do with Orton being pinned, Edge's Spear did. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Finish of the Main Event revisited

message: According to Matt Striker as of 2008, CM Punk beat MVP for the US Championship at this event.  Shouldn't this be referenced somewhere?  I thought it was hilariously awful retcon work. AndarielHalo (talk) 21:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Announcers sometimes mess up or misspeak. NN if Matt Striker said that (if he said it), and it has nothing to do with this event. TJ Spyke 22:36, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CM Punk vs MVP 

message: Several times in the article, fairly simple moves were being described in elaborate detail - such as Umaga's top-rope Splash and Melina's Inverted DDT. I feel this made the article difficult to read and frustrating for anyone that knows anything about wrestling. For anyone that doesn't, each move links to a description anyway. There may be more instances, as I just skimmed to find them. A check would be appreciated. Thanks. Tory88 (talk) 15:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplification 
Talk:Schijndel

message: With so little information this data is best put to used in an economy section for Schijndel gidonb (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose on the grounds that a 150-year old company of that size will be independently notable. Klbrain (talk) 12:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Withdrawn. While the above is an irrelevant notability argument, I have expanded the article and it can now be kept! gidonb (talk) 19:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Bolsius]] into [[Schijndel]]
Talk:Target ship

message: So... which was first? Boggs in 1934, or Iowa/Utah sometime before 1932. This article is starting to look silly. Make your minds up, people! Catsmeat (talk) 09:43, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is neither.  I should read my own links "fully" I post.  The one on the Utah pages tells the truth.  And  that USN officer who claims he was in the Popular Mechanics article on the Boggs wasn't the inventor of the radio control unit either! The first radio control ship it seems according to the Popular Science link On the Utah is the destroyer Stoddert.  I will do some more reading as the Utah PopSc link gives another article in a 1931 issue and correct everything.  Talk about a general mess up! But in my defence that is what the extremely large Popular Mechanics article on the Boggs stated. Thanks for catching it. Jack - Jackehammond (talk) 18:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not even the Stoddert. It was the Iowa.  The Stoddert was the destroyer used to test radio control equipment that became standard from experience from the earlier Iowa test. Talk about a general mess up by the writers and editors of that day! Jackehammond (talk) 19:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: World's First Radio Controlled Target Ship
Talk:Second Drees cabinet

message: ===Move discussion in progress===
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Netherlands cabinet Drees-2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 22:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  These are notices of the same RM discussion – out-of-process moves were made while the discussion was open 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Netherlands cabinet Drees-2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 22:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Second Drees cabinet which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Parumala Seminary

message: Too much on St. Gregorios, not enough on the seminary.  We should create an article on St. Gregorios and move that material there.  (What name would that be under?) -- RJFJR (talk) 18:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: that would be at Gregorios Geevarghese (already existing).  I'm moving most of the material opn him to that talk page. -- RJFJR (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Soltam M-66

message: At first i thought that vafa is a copy of soltam so it was me who originally added a section to soltam m66 which clamied that Vafa was a copy of M66, but after closer examination it become clear for me that vafa is not a copy of m66 for example m66 is a smoothbore mortar while Vafa is not   and also there is no source that indicate that vafa is a copy of soltam or even that iran received m66 from any country.Farzam1370 (talk) 21:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vafa 160mm mortar and Soltam M-66
Talk:Usplash

message: started the page on this tool.
need help to expand it.
=== objection on deletion ===
i object on the deletion of this page.
its a nice piece of software whcih need a place in wikipedia which i have done.
nevertheless i have added more description as well as few more links in the article.
i am not removing marked to be deleted, please review this and if you consider then remove this artile from deletion list.
anantshri (talk) 09:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i object on the deletion of this page.
its a nice piece of software whcih need a place in wikipedia which i have done.
nevertheless i have added more description as well as few more links in the article.
i am not removing marked to be deleted, please review this and if you consider then remove this artile from deletion list.
anantshri (talk) 09:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  objection on deletion
Talk:Laurel Hill Coláiste

message: Does the school talk in irish all the time? Do they explain in english afterwards? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.112.59 (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the time, but english explanations are given. Irish isn't actually spoken that much outside of the classromm, but oral exams for junior cert and leaving cert are undertaken in Irish, higher level only.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyper on water (talk • contribs) 09:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Betuwe

message: Ludwig van Beethoven's name was a partial phonetic Germanization of the Dutch term for "from Betuwe". His ancestors stemmed from there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.82.234.98 (talk) 20:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beethoven 

message: As per title.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:17, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It ought to be yes, they're Dutch and Latin names for the same region. I've started a merger proposal. Zacwill (talk) 10:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been raised before by User:Andrew Lancaster at Talk:Batavia (region)#Should this article not be merged with Betuwe? where User:Prinsgezinde disagreed. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically you are saying one is the "History" article for the other? This will not at all be obvious to most English speakers. Batavia is not even mentioned on the Betuwe article today, and if we add more links to catch all misunderstandings then we'll be asking ourselves why we did not just merge. Normally on WP this would be handled by having a history article or section. In this case, given that the articles are short, I think a merge would normally be quite possible?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

text: I would support a merge. I think the quality of one united article would be better.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Noting the consensus on both pages and the obvious logic, I intend to push this through unless there is some meaningful reason given not to.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 18:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

text: I have expanded the other article with material including from this article. I think it is possible to now to turn this article into a redirect. --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection. Srnec (talk) 19:56, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll go ahead, having waited a while. I will add a histmerge template.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 17:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article not be merged with [[Batavia (region)]]
Talk:Los Angeles Police Department resources

message: The information provided in the "Radio communications" section seems overly specific/technical for the context of Wikipedia. Instead of completely removing it, I would like to give an opportunity for others to clean it up. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 19:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think a list of radio codes, radio terms and unit callsigns, especially without any source does belong on WP. 83.168.137.1 (talk) 02:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The "fictitious example of an LAPD dispatch radio transmission" is overtly racist and should be removed. 2604:2D80:B102:B600:E547:F36C:9E27:68DB (talk) 22:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excess technical information on Radio communications section
Talk:Defence of property

message: I just removed this; it was the second paragraph in the article:
:Prof. Lau says - don't really stress this.  Jurisdiction to jurisdiction this changes and Matt dreamed up a thoery of avoiding liabilty with a sign ~ which is most likely not going to be good law in any jurisdiction.
It reads like offhand notes to someone and misspells "liability" and "theory". Someone with knowledge on this subject in English law needs to rewrite this article or it should be deleted altogether as it is so poorly written. —-- Blanchette (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly Written 

message: Why not British Law or UK Law? English law made me think it was a discussion of English Common Law, not modern British jurisprudence. I had to read the entire article to realize this was a discussion of defense of property in the modern day UK. Beerslurpy (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Law? 

message: As of 2013, this article is rather out of date concerning "current" provisions for householders in the UK defending themselves against intruders. Disproportionate force can now be permitted provided it isn't "grossly disproportionate". http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/self_defence/#a01 77.96.101.104 (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 
Talk:List of birds of Serbia

message: Since the country of :Serbia and Montenegro no longer exists, is this article going to be split into the present countries of :Serbia and :Montenegro? -- Hmains (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?

message: Some of the species do not live in Serbia any more (Little Bustard) and others never did (Phalacrocorax aristotelis). I also suggest inclusion of official names in Serbian.
91.150.77.74 (talk) 13:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We are all volunteers. If you have a reliable source which has the names in Serbian, please add them with a reference. SchreiberBike | ⌨  17:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: * Suggestion to remove White-eyed gull, Ichthyaetus leucophthalmus as there are no known records in Serbia, areal is far away from Serbia and it seems to have been accidentally added in clean up update on 22:21, 7 January 2021‎.
* Suggestion to remove Rose-ringed parakeet, Psittacula krameri as all known records are escapees, it is not known that they breed in the wild in Serbia, and seems to have been accidentally added in clean up update on 19:45, 11 January 2021‎.
* Suggestion to remove Western Orphean warbler, Curruca hortensis and Western black-eared wheatear, Oenanthe hispanica as in both cases areals of Western species are far enough from Serbia and after the splits there are only records of Eastern species. Records before the splits refer to Western species names causing confusion, as most likely they were actually records of current Eastern variants.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.240.144.101 (talk) 12:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal Suggestions
Talk:Pirate's Cove

message: How is Pirate's Cove a "German Style" board game?  It features representational mechanisms, geographic movement, dice-rolling, and simulation-style combat.  It does have simple rules and good artwork, but this alone does not, a German-style game, make. If Pirate's Cove is a German-Style board game, then so is Smugglers of the Galaxy, Talisman, or even Axis & Allies, which no one would claim.---- Daniel (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: German Style board game?
Talk:List of posthumous publications of Holocaust victims

message: Question: how does a genocide count as military history? was it commanded by the German military? If so, then, yeah, I guess it's military history. 204.52.215.107 (talk) 04:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: FYI: Publisher Series: WP: List of posthumous publications of Holocaust victims
http://www.librarything.com/topic/135320
Леонид Розенфельд (talk) 15:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  LibraryThing 

message: Hi! I tried to identify some wikidata links for the red links on this list:
# Julius Feldman · no WMF page
# Sarah Fishkin · no WMF page
# Eva Heyman · :de:Éva Heyman
# Elsa Katz · no WMF page
# Chaim Kaplan · :fr:Chaim Kaplan
# Aryeh Klonicki · no WMF page
# Abraham Lewin · :pl:Abraham Lewin
# Ruthka Lieblich · no WMF page
# Philip Mechanicus · :de:Philip Mechanicus
# Gonda Redlich · :he:אגון רדליך
# Dawid Rubinowicz · :pl:Dawid Rubinowicz
# Dawid Sierakowiak · :pl:Dawid Sierakowiak
# Jerzy Feliks Urman · no WMF page
no WMF page  try to create a page wikidate or first at commons and then at wikidata
Please add more! Thanks in advance!
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 13:19, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  links to wikidata
Talk:Holm–Bonferroni method

message: The description is correct, it is statistics that can feel backwards! A researcher typically looks for some difference, e.g. "this new drug is better than the usual drug". The null hypothesis says: "Nothing special here, the two drugs give the same results". Therefore, the REJECTED null hypotheses (those with the low p-values) are the interesting results.
Lj phys (talk) 14:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

message: w(i) does not appear to be defined. 99.96.68.14 (talk) 17:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  weighted Holm-Bonferroni 

message: There seems to be an error in the example, revisited in this section. Applying the given formula, 
\widetilde{p}_{(i)}=\max_{j\leq i}\left\{ (m-j+1)p_{(j)}\right\}, 
to the example in which  p_{(1)}=0.005, p_{(2)}=0.01, p_{(3)}=0.03, \text{ and } p_{(4)}=0.04,  I get \widetilde{p}_{(1)}=4\times 0.005=0.02, \widetilde{p}_{(2)}=\max\{0.02, 3\times 0.01\} = 0.03,  \widetilde{p}_{(3)}=\max\{0.03, 2 \times 0.03\}=0.06,\text{ and } \widetilde{p}_{(4)}=\max\{0.06, 1\times 0.04\}=0.06 .Izmirlig (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjusted p-values
Talk:North Salem, New York

message: The demographics section needs major reworking; it feels like someone collected a bunch of statistics and then tried to tie them together with some words. Before I completely rewrite the section, which is composed of two rather large paragraphs, I thought I would open up this space to allow for opposition. InterstellarWhale (talk) 20:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics Section
Talk:Vera Steadman

message: The article lists a citation from newspapers.com stating Ms. Steadman as being 65 when she passed away.  However, she was 66.  I'm new to editing articles, so I wasn't sure what to do to correct this since there is a source involved. Free State Mom 1 (talk) 23:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in her age within article
Template talk:Teas

message: I think this template is pretty lame because there are so many missing information regarding tea types and tea culture. It inclines to just Asian, especially Far East Asia. Why Sri Lanka and Thai tea culture are not included? And English tea culture also should be mentioned. ---- Appletrees (talk) 20:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's improve it (you can start expanding it if you think it should be expanded). I think the colors and design are really good. Badagnani (talk) 05:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed to use the adjectives as the articles that discuss tea cultures generally use that form.  Better than using country names too, because Tea cultures apply beyond country boundaries. For example, there are many places to experience Japanese Tea Culture in New York.  --HighKing (talk) 11:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This template

message: Teh botol is a brand name packaged commercial beverage in Indonesia.  Its nature is inconsistent with the other "Tea beverages" listed, and it is fundamentally just a type of commercially packaged Iced tea http://www.sosro.com/teh-botol-sosro.php Surlyhacker (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should [[Teh botol]] be removed from "Tea beverages"?
Talk:Chevrolet Engineering Research Vehicle

message: The suggestion for merging Cerv 1 contents into this article has been around for a while now. Since no one seems to care, I'm going to simply do the merge. roguegeek (talk·cont) 01:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This vehicle is not a Corvette so the new title doesn't call it one(Vegavairbob (talk) 04:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  title 

message: Barrett-Jackson sold CERV-1 to a Mr Finnegan ? over phone for $1,200,000 on Jan 21 2017  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF81:4380:F42A:F3EB:9BAF:A1B1 (talk) 01:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SOLD
Talk:Gabriel Traversari

message: Anyone else think this article reads like a vanity entry?
* I don't. Callelinea (talk) 20:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Even if there was "significant" third-party notability (which there doesn't seem to have ever been....I remember coming to this article years ago and it was only the person that was the topic of the article that was insistent on it remaining up, to include being offended if readers mentioned his lack of notability and requested the article be reviewed for WP:N), external links and references look to be non-existent or archived/no longer in operation. 
I think this article can safely be removed from Wikipedia. 2600:1702:4850:2CD0:CDEE:69CA:1112:AED3 (talk) 16:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't meet WP:N guidelines?
Talk:Armoured Brigade (Finland)

message: Right-hand side box is missing "MT-LB" from the "Equipment" list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.130.34.197 (talk) 19:35, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maytime (musical)

message: There is a fairly detailed plot summary here (as well as other information about the musical (or operetta if you prefer).  If anyone has the time and inclination, they could use it to expand the very brief synopsis that we have in the article currently, and probably to expand other information about the original production.  It also mentions a Canadian production. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary and other info.
Talk:Shinrone

message: Dot on map is incorrect. Belmonter (talk) 16:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect location of dot on map

message: Too, too, too much info on Hand, he does have his own page. Belmonter (talk) 19:29, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Edward Hand
Talk:Military ranks of Hungary

message: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tizedes and Army ranks and insignia of the Austro-Hungarian Army have Tizedes as Corporal, but I'm (completely) unfamiliar with the subject matter...  76.88.107.46 (talk) 04:43, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  tizedes? 
Talk:Suryavanshi Aare Katika

message: I've removed the following statement from the first paragraph, as it doesn't belong in an article.
The members of this community constitute about (any idea) % of the Indian population.
Anyone who can find an appropriate source can add it back into the main article (with an actual percentage, of course). --- FrankTobia (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General cleanup 

message: I'm not even sure whether this is vandalism or something else, I am actually confused, and if it is, where does it begin, and where does it end? When do I revert to? What is this article even supposed to be? This is a redirect, normally, nobody will ever see any content on this page... what is going on?! MWYAHzephyriteMWYAH (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is even going on, on this page, this is supposed to be a redirect, yet there's loads of content?
Talk:WGBG-FM

message: What about the history of WKHI as "100KHI" on 99.9 in Ocean City, Maryland in the 1980s? I don't get how a station can move from Exmore to Fruitland with a different callsign and frequency and still be considered the same station, yet the history prior to Exmore is forgotten. Thanks.
Boteman (talk) 03:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: on September 4, 2015 WKHI changed their format to Country, branded as "Your Country K107".WKHI Salisbury Goes Back to Country76.27.198.89 (talk) 02:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Format Change Back to Country
Talk:Index of Puerto Rico–related articles

message: thanks for the help but u should add in some of these topics
:This should probably be converted into a category, just for practical purpouse. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is one of 57 lists of topics related to the United States and its associated nations.  --Buaidh (talk) 14:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Buz Sawyer

message: I expanded the Sunday strip section, and included Roscoe Sweeney in the section title. I was looking for a good source of information and referenced a blog site that had reproductions of two dozen of the Roscoe Sweeney Sunday strips. I obtained my information from reading the actual comics, and not from what the blogger had written. Karenthewriter (talk) 16:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roscoe Sweeney and Blog as Reference 

message: Is the spelling for Sweeney's first name Rosco or Roscoe? In the early scans I could find online, the name seems to be Rosco, although I'm not sure on whether the spelling would change later. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosco or Roscoe
Talk:WSCL

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a proposal defining the message sequences for web services is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the proposal. - Dravecky (talk) 07:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page