lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mars Blackmon

message: Clearly user Dmdixon put a lot of effort into expanding this article here, unfortunately it's made up of a lot of original research and the tone is completely wrong for Wikipedia.  Most of the references used don't seem particularly helpful as they refer sometimes to tangential issues (defining "Bike messengers") or directly to various films.  I don't have access to any of the other references used so I can't check them for usefulness but given that the article as it now stands does not belong in Wikipedia, I recommend reverting to an earlier version and maybe try to incorporate whatever's useful in this version into that one. SQGibbon (talk) 04:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there were no objections and it's been over two weeks I boldly reverted to an earlier version. SQGibbon (talk) 22:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert article to previous version 

message: it's used in the article as a generic term for a hip hop fan, when in fact it has a very specific meaning in hip hop culture which i'm sure the writer is aware of, so i don't understand the reason or motive for watering-down the word
is mars a breaker? yes? ok he's a b-boy. no? then you need to call him something else or risk diluting the word b-boy til it means just about anything or worse yet, nothing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.176.112 (talk) 07:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Boy is not generic
Talk:Eric Finch

message: How was Finch in Warrior? 129.21.109.43 01:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How was he? 

message: I'm removing this template from all its articles:
Which, I agree, is fairly provocative. However, I don't see how "V for Vendetta" deserves this on its own, or what useful information it provides. Surely the links in the articles are sufficient? If people want to revert my changes, that's fine by me. But please reply to this post so we can get a discussion started. At the moment I see no reason why the template should exist. Maccy69 13:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted my previous edit and requested a template deletion instead, see below. Maccy69 17:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  V for Vendetta Template 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Maccy69 17:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:V for Vendetta}}]]
Talk:Pentex

message: It appears that this page has been a victim of vandalism --Macersl 16:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

message: The article describes O'Tolley's as a company that "sells dirt cheap fast food full of empty calories. Of all of Pentex's many tainted products, OTolley's foods are among the fastest acting, causing massive weight gain, diabetes, and emotional instability". Anyone else see a parody of Mc'Donald's? Crimson Shadow 18:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: O'Tolley's

message: it should be said that the company is more or less totally based on real life Monsanto inc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.14.121.104 (talk) 00:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which company specifically?  Do you have a reference?  Without a reference, that is considered original research and doesn't belong here. -Verdatum (talk) 01:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  monsanto
Talk:Minnehaha

message: Was Minnehaha an actual figure from Native American myth, or was she invented by Longfellow? I'd like to know because I'm not sure if she should be added into the Fictional Native Americans category or into the Native American mythology categories. Asarelah 19:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Mythic" can refer to traditional Native American myths, so I wasn't clear about it. I'll change "mythic" to "fictional". Asarelah 00:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Upper Sydenham railway station

message: Was the line called "The West End and Crystal Palace Railway" or "The Crystal Palace and South London Junction Railway". I wonder if the line the other "Crystal Palace" station was on was called "The West End and Crystal Palace Railway"
: see talk of the West End and Crystal Palace Railway, i've asked the same question after reading about the history of the LCDR Pickle 15:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WE&CPR vs CP&SLJR 

message: Sorry Qutezuce, i think we should keep this page. There are plenty of shorter railway station stubs out there, there are plenty on closed stations and its been deemed somewhere that all railway stations are notable (your proposed criteria for deletion). You've also not amused me by a) not outline why anywhere and b) not telling anyone (as the template you used suggests). We're not all omnipresent with limitless time, this is a low priority article but worthy of mention. Pickle 01:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion ??? 

message: "Disused Stations" of "Subterranea Britannica" has a great page here on the station and other stations in the line. Pickle 01:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources for expansion 

message: The 'Current' section says that "The station's location sits in Dulwich Woods, providing a popular local footpath." - but I'm fairly sure that isn't true. Lordship Lane railway station does sit in Dulwich woods. Anyone able to confirm? Here's an old map: http://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17&lat=51.4332&lon=-0.0717&layers=176 EAi (talk) 09:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location?
Talk:Michael Bentt

message: The intro says 1965, the box on the right says 1964.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malau (talk • contribs) 13:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This discrepancy has stood here for years. I've changed all the occurrences to 1964, which agrees with the Boxrec reference and the BBC, although not the IMdB (not a reliable source). Would anyone who prefers 1965 please give their sources at this talk page before changing it in the article: Noyster  (talk),  18:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth ?

message: Bentt nowadays does look like an acting teacher.  I saw the website. Quite impressed.  Oddly enough his old trainer Eddie Mustafa Muhammad was also in a fight film...Raging Bull as Billy Fox in 1980; and of course I saw Mr. Bentt as Liston in Ali (more than a decade ago).
Bentt's not the only guy to pursue a career in acting (whether it is in theatre or otherwise).  Marvelous Marvin Hagler and Carlos Palomino have also pursued it as a post-boxing career.
98.207.68.146 (talk) 06:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bentt & Eddie Mustafa Muhammad...
Talk:Death Dealer (Underworld)

message: Missed these being added originally. Merging some might be more sensible, such as making elders & death dealers sections of a Vampire (underworld) article --Nate1481( t/c) 13:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: prod
Talk:Vampire (Underworld)

message: Missed these being added originally. Merging some might be more sensible, such as making elders & death dealers sections of a Vampire (underworld) article --Nate1481( t/c) 14:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: Where is all this cited at? Care to give *where* in the movie this comes from? Q T C 06:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, having just watched the movie, nowhere in the subtitles is the word Vampyre, it is always Vampire.  So unless there's some conclusive proof other then 'some vial in the movie' I'm going to have to suggest that the spelling stays as-is. Q T C 17:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vampire -> Vampyre
Talk:Engineering Science

message: Perhaps information on specific programs should be moved to their own, or a relavent page?
I removed it, will make it consistent with the consensues in Engineering Physics  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.126.69.92 (talk) 03:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific programs 

message: The Toronto program does not belong here, and it will be removed. it sort of overbalances the article.  So will the list of notable programs unless some documentation can be provided. We cant just make even sensible value judgments of our own here. 
Almost no individual academic department in the world in any subject has a separate WP page, and if you create one, it will inevitably be nominated for deletion,and almost certainly deleted unless you can show that it is notable separately independently of the college. I suggest you make a page for the various engineering departments at Toronto, giving them each a section. This hasnt really been tried yet, and it would be interesting to see it. I think it could probably be defended. 
:as a practical matter, you should probably make it off line or in a user sandbox, and add it when its complete and well sourced. you know the way people are around here (smile) DGG 04:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: advice

message: If this is an article about a specific program at a specific university, then the first section is not relevant, being general background only, and the article can and will be challenged as non-notable. 
:If this is an article about the subject, then the Toronto part should be removed. 
::I ask the editors to choose. 
:::If left to myself, I'd choose to keep an article, by deleting the over specific part. The edit comment on the article asked that this be discussed on the talk page, so let's discuss it. DGG (talk) 03:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: hearing no objections, I've just removed it. P{lease discuss objections here, do not revert. DGG (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Marcus Corvinus

message: This article is about a character who is only prominent in one move, Underworld: Evolution. So this article should merge or redirect to Underworld: Evolution or Underworld (film series)#Characters.
As the article currently stands, it violates WP:N, WP:V, WP:PLOT; 
* It is a plot dump
* Outside of the introduction, it is unreferenced
* It has no indication of notability
So, this article should be merged away, or just plain redirected, or deleted. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 04:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge away
Talk:Atrioventricular node

message: Why do the AV note delay the impulse? How does this work? Can't seem to find it anywhere. 
18:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Lucky Brand Jeans

message: this is practically advert for a lesser known brand of clothing, admin, please look at this
Seriously, this article reads like a damn brochure. --69.110.129.109 05:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To be fair the type of jeans and the 'shopping experience', or maybe intended shopping experience (though this is still obviously subjective to some degree) is exactly the sort of information I want if that's what separates this brand from any other--Voltaire53 18:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The Lucky Me part has only been introduced recently... (last year or so) It was lucky you always though. 72.174.31.77 (talk) 08:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucky You vs Lucky Me
Talk:Birchbark biting

message: Probably this article will not ever be a long one.  But still there are some things that can be done to improve this article:
# illustration showing both the "cut/pierced" types and the "thinned" types of Mazinibaganjiganan.
# purpose of a Mazinibaganjigan.
# which part of the inner birch bark is used to make a Mazinibaganjigan.
# traditionally who made them.
# treatment of the bark to allow for making a Mazinibaganjigan.
# distribution of Mazinibaganjigan-making communities.
# links to other art similar to a Mazinibaganjigan
CJLippert 05:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do to improve
Talk:Detection of internally reflected Cherenkov light

message: I am inclined not to mention everything about Cherenkov radiation in this DIRC article but to reference the relevant articles and concentrate on the specific properties of a DIRC. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 13:04, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cherenkov formula in DIRC 

message: It is only a laser beam with total internal reflection and no Cherenkov light, nevertheless this image can visualise how the angle is preserved as the light zigzags along. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 14:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo candidate for DIRC visualisation 

message: Regarding the use of the DIRC acronym one finds both "Detect_or [of|for]" and "Detect_ion of" in the scientific papers and community. Often one reads about DIRC detector, hence the -ion version would be less of a tautology.
Further, I want to suggest to capitalise the I and the R in the Lemma, i.e. it would read
Detection of Internally-Reflected Cherenkov light
Thoughts and discussion... -- KlausFoehl (talk) 11:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DIRC lemma and acronym expansion 

message: -- KlausFoehl (talk) 16:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  further image 

message: There is a book about Cherenkov radiation, "Cerenkov Radiation and its applications" by J.V. Jelley, published 1958. On page 138 the idea of a Cherenkov counter based on total internal reflexion is presented. The person which has proposed this is named Porter, but no references are given. -- AdrianZink 10:46, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  DIRC was first proposed by Blair Ratcliff?
Talk:Slobodan Kačar

message: The reference "Perucica" is not correct, it should not go to that article, instead it should go to a village Perucica near Jajce, now part of Jezero municipality - please check this HR article, which is about that village: http://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peru%C4%87ica_%28Jezero,_BiH%29 (I don't know how to correct this in a proper way, so I suggest someone who knows to do it.) Twonex (talk) 09:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Montell Griffin

message: This article seems to be filled in mostly by fans and never fact checked - there are no proper sources, and at least some bits seem to praise the person while belittling his opponent(s). Could someone reputable within the site have a look and require sources if needed? I do not wish to edit, as I would rather stay out of possible edit fights as a passer by without an account. 2001:14BA:8300:0:0:0:3:EBD8 (talk) 01:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact check
Talk:North Plains, Oregon

message: After 1874, John (Johann) Joos ( DOB:12/4/1848 Constance, Switzerland) and Elizabeth Langohr-Joos (DOB: 1/21/1849 Griesalsfelt,Germany/Switzerland)  settled the new town of North Plains.  John Joos was the brewmaster for Henry Weinhart's
beer in Portland, OR.  Other income for the Joos family was the new business of the 'North Plains Flour Mill'.
The Joos Family children:
(1)Emma Christine (1875-1910)no surviors,
(2)Mary Ananda (1876-1967) married George Zimmerman. Children: Walter, John George,Edith Joos-vanDehey-Howell,Pete,Heine
(3)Will Joos (m.Mattie OToelle, & Edith Baker Children: Will /Harry Joos, 
(4)John Joos M. Alma Eckman -One daughter died during childbirth age 19.
(5)Paulaina Catrina Joos-Hargood Child: Adeline Beatrice Hargood-Skibinski. Children: Barbara (Coco) Skibinski-Brush,Robert U. Skibinski,JR
(6) Rosa Joos-Brueseter- no children
(7)Louisa Joos Died age 2
(8)Anna Joos-Plelps-Children:Clare Phelps and Don Plelps.
 4/20/2010 by Barbara Brush,Portland, OR  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.204.3 (talk) 18:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early History of North Plains, Oregon
Talk:How Great Thou Art (Elvis Presley album)

message: I removed the incorrect statement that this album beat out Sgt Pepper at the 1967 Grammy Awards.
Please see: 
http://www.grammys.com/GRAMMY_Awards/Winners/Results.aspx?title=&winner=beatles&year=0&genreID=0&hp=1
and:
http://www.grammys.com/GRAMMY_Awards/Winners/Results.aspx?title=&winner=elvis%20presley&year=0&genreID=0&hp=1
- Itsfullofstars 21:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammy awards
Talk:Araluen, New South Wales

message: I live here and it's not very good 49.195.45.155 (talk) 13:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shit town
Talk:Kramers' theorem

message: I think the link in the references to the original article goes to the right journal, but not the right issue?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.18.5 (talk) 12:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link 

message: Have not read the original Kramers' work, but the "Kramers' theorem" I know is:
In a system with time-reversal symmetry (TRS) all energy levels are even times degenerate.  (I have checked this statement for electrons.) Thus a system possessing TRS can not, for example, have a three-fold degenerate energy level.
There is also a serious mistake in the article:  an electric field can break the TRS (e.g., when I apply electric field to a metal, electric current starts to flow), and in this case Kramers' theorem is not valid. (Of course, a system without the TRS can still have degenerate energy levels, e.g., due to spatial symmetries.)
--Shalaev (talk) 21:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the remark on the even times degeneracy issue. I reworded so that it points to this more general case. Megaleoo (talk) 06:33, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not completely correct
Talk:Annie Whitehead

message: I added the BBC thing to show she's notable. I'm thinking of removing the "unclear importance" deal.--T. Anthony 13:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it, see history: 17:12, 3 November 2006 BNutzer (References and sources added, rm , the list of credits plus her albums prove notability in my view). Cheers, BNutzer 13:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tony Tubbs

message: The article People's Choice Heavyweight Tournament has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:A search for references found one published (gBooks) minor reference to the fight.Craig Peterson and Burt Cooper are the only mentioned fighters and neither is mentioned in this article. Fails WP:N and WP:V
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[People's Choice Heavyweight Tournament]] 

message: "and finally avenged his loss to Marvis Frazier, who prior to that upset went unbeaten with a 42–0 (21 KOs) record."  --- Just who is this referring to here? Frazier only had 21 professional fights (19-2), losing to Mike Tyson and Larry Holmes. Tubbs never met Marvis in the ring. Besides, Tubbs went 21-1 after losing his 22nd bout (versus Tim Witherspoon). 72.174.131.123 (talk) 07:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  what?
Talk:Orlin Norris

message: This article lacks sourcing and non-PoV structure.  There are several claims that need to be sourced, such as the "serious knee injury" that was "confirmed" after the fight with Tyson.  There is a glaring inconsistency in the intro, which has him listed as 5'9", while the one and only link on the page ( http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=515&cat=boxer ) has him at 5'11".  The article reads like it was lifted straight from somewhere else, perhaps a fan page, though I am basing that solely on my opinion as a reader.  --S.Reemas, 9/1/10  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.86.24 (talk) 23:51, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article quality 

message: More details should be provided regarding the flop in 1999. Plus it looked like an uppercut.  Also how much did Norris make after his flop.  The quote re: the MRI scan is unsourced, and I find no reference to it via Google.  Might be pure fiction.
Tym Whittier (talk) 21:46, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flop vs. Tyson in 1999
Talk:McLaren MP4/13

message: At Neil Oatley's article it says that he designed this car (along with the MP4/14), but in this article it says Adrian Newey. Which is it? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I just had a look at McLaren's official site and it lists them both as designers. I will edit any relevant articles accordingly. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Neil Oatley
Talk:Network One

message: I believe that the list of affiliates, in addition to receiving a major cleanup, needs to be split off as a new article, which should be located at List of Network One affiliates.  The affiliate list articles for most networks -- even UATV and MTV2 -- are separate from the network's article, and Network One should be no exception.  Anyone else agree?  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:45, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliate list 

message: I added the "disputed" tage for Network One, since I feel that the information presented is not correct. Being a latecomer to the large dish C-Band in 1997, I know for a fact that Network One was on the air at that time, and I think didn't close down until as late as 1998 or 1999.
Also, Network One's satellite signal was always in the clear until it folded. -- azumanga 23:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changes made, per the above, though we still got to pinpoint the birth and death dates. Could anyone chime in? -- azumanga 04:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute of Network One History 
Talk:S-300VM missile system

message: --188.255.41.104 (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  S-300V, VM, V4, this is one family, designed and produced by another plant, than the usual S-300 

message: Are we selling these things here? CsikosLo (talk) 12:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advertisement 
Talk:Kai (Akira)

message: Pathetic does not even begin to describe the shape of this article. I deleted A LOT of original research. It was everywhere'. I also made the intro text consistently about the manga story, per MoS: Anime & Manga. Per MoS: Anime & Manga, this page must be first about Kaisuke, the character in the manga. Much of the article was referencing the movie for some reason. Also, the grammar was at (barely) grade school level. There's still a lot more work to be done. Cheers, ask123 17:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article was in pathetic shape; now it's barely passable
Talk:Gibbs–Donnan effect

message: I suggest merging the two pages Donnan equilibrium and this page.  It would have to be decided which is the more appropriate name.  On a Google search for "Donnan semipermeable" I get far more hits than on a search for "Gibbs-Donnan semipermeable", suggesting that possibly a name such as "Donnan equilibrium" may be the more commonly accepted name, but perhaps "Gibbs-Donnan" is more scientifically correct -- I don't know.  --Coppertwig 01:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with Donnan equilibrium 

message: Should be Gibbs–Donnan effect (with em-dash), not Gibbs-Donnan effect (with hyphen):  Gibbs and Donnan were distinct individuals.
—DIV (128.250.80.15 (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I would like to include information about the pH change involved with the Donnan effect. Any suggestions or recommended sources? Shpang03 (talk) 21:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example 