lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Discipline (BDSM)

message: the image of concern is 
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Shirtless_man_whipping_two_nude_women_crawling.jpg
this image can spread a very wrong message as the act says itself could be domestic violence Ravinesh rds (talk) 13:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved your signature from the header of the section to after the post.  Please sign your posts on talk pages after the message itself, and not in the heading. Secondly, this article is not about domestic violence, so it is unclear what the issue is. --bonadea contributions talk 18:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  the image spreads a misleading message of domestic violence 
Talk:KisMAC

message: My change was not a minor edit.  I accidentally checked the box.  My bad.  Can someone unmark that as a minor edit?  IlliterateSage 03:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone name anything in particular that needs referencing?
T3h 11:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: referencing

message: i feal the opening paragraph is sooo pov and biased the entire article needs an NPOV tag, i don't think its should be stated that its features are "far exceeding..."Im not sure if it classifies as an advert because the whole article comes pretty close and the fact it can only run on certain hardware whereas the alternatives run on everything(or everything that runs properly in linux for kismet) is brushed over
Xbehave 02:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: So good

message: The article states that kismac is being actively developed, the revision log on http://trac.kismac-ng.org/log/ however shows that development effectively stopped in February 2011, nor is there any activity on related mailinglists or forums. --Itsme (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  active? 

message: is this even a legal program it sounds pretty bad  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.88.106 (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like there are some legal limitations on this software at least in Germany, and it may also be restricted in other countries. How "bad" it is depends wholly on how it's used, as there are many legitimate reasons to use such a program. For instance I've personally used this program to sniff out people who were illegally and covertly trying to gain access to county-owned enterprise networks. --89.10.230.40 (talk) 23:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this legal? 
Talk:Matthieu Laurette

message: I like Laurette's work, but the tone of the article needs to change. It could easily be mistaken for (self) promotion. Since the article has been linked to various artist lists, notability in particular needs to be established or someone might recommend it for deletion. Which I wouldn't like to see happen.--Ethicoaestheticist 12:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Thanks for your remarks. I'm glad you also like his work. 
Of course i wouldn't like that this entry would be recommended for deletion either.
What do you suggest then?
Concerning notability: All page where I listed him mentioned that one of the criteria was "Artists in this list have proven their importance because their work has been shown in contemporary art exhibitions of worldwide importance, such as the Venice Biennale" which he happened to be part of in 2001.
Yconnan 12:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a reference to Bourriaud's Postproduction. Other published references to Laurette would be useful (the newspaper articles can be included as references). Things I suggest changing are: cutting "Laurette has often been credited as the spiritual son of Andy Warhol and Guy Debord", unless a reference can support the claim; cutting "Laurette established his artistic birth certificate" and replacing with a more neutral description of the work; adding more information about some of the group shows, and perhaps trimming the list to include the most significant. The notable achievements need to be stated clearly. His inclusion in the Venice Biennale could be included in the first para. To sum up: keep it neutral, give references, bring notable achievements to the top.--Ethicoaestheticist 13:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Looking good. I'll move the first couple of paras of Biography to the top as an introduction.--Ethicoaestheticist 16:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Any Suggestion?
Talk:City audio guides

message: i dont see any reason for Mintel to be there in the external links
protocol96@gmail.com
202.87.35.198 12:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that observation. User:Simonbrooke1 created the article, and a WHOIS shows that mp3cityguides.com is registered to a person named Simon Brooke. I stubified that article as there was so little content directly related to city audio guides, and as a WP:LINKFARM was beginning to form. Merging to somewhere else maybe a good option. 98.122.180.154 (talk) 10:41, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Hugo Stoltzenberg

message: The section re the use of gas during WWI states that it was "against a force of mostly colonial soldiers from French Africa known as Goumiers".  If you follow the Goumiers link however the page states that Goumiers were never deployed outside of Morocco between 1914-1918.   
I’ve added a citation required label until someone can clear up the issue one way or the other.  Clearly the statements cannot both be correct. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.173.76.218 (talk) 11:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted. It was my mistake. Fixed and referenced now. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 13:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goumiers 
Talk:Angeles City/Archive 2

message: I've tried to clean up this talk page by making section breaks where appropriate, adding the Unsigned template to user comments where I could, and moving one user's comments out of the middle of someone else's. Hopefully this will make a little more sense now.
Please, folks, remember to sign your comments by putting four tildes at the end of your reply, or clicking on the "Sign your name" link below the "Save Page" button. --Kesh 04:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for doing that. It was quite a confusing read. -- Sir Escher  talk 06:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup here
Talk:Pravdino, Vyborgsky District

message: Dear fellow editors,
I am leaving the present message out of courtesy to other editors watching this article.
Muolaa redirects to this article, which is a poor representation of the much more complete article at the Finnish Wikipedia: :fi:Muolaa. Therefore, I intend to create an article here at the en.wiki for a new translation of the latter, then remove the redirect, and also link the new article to this one, as it contains an occurrence of the original name (Muolaa). 
With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(become old-fashioned!) 17:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements needed
Talk:European Rugby League

message: Don't mean to be critical, but this article separately in different places says there are three, four and seven full members of the RLEF.  Now I know how difficult it is to check and follow this stuff (the latest information I saw says there are five full members, but then that was the 2010 annual report) but can whoever edits this article please try to be consistent across the board?  Cheers.  Stevebritgimp (talk) 22:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for picking this up: I think the article has fallen out of date in a number of respects. I've updated the membership and the rankings. --Mkativerata (talk) 22:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership 

message: Whist it says on their website they oversee the entire Northern Hemisphere, I can't see them having any jurisdiction in places like the USA, India, Japan, Columbia, Algeria, etc. I know they have some oversight outside of Europe but I feel then entire Northern Hemisphere is very factually inaccurate. If anyone has better insight please comment. Mn1548 (talk) 11:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jurisdiction
Talk:Peter Jefferson

message: So, I saw this article recently, about Thomas Jefferson's alleged African-American ancestry: http://www.diversityinc.com/public/1461.cfm . I quote:
:Jefferson, who served two terms between 1801 and 1809, was described as the "son of a half-breed Indian squaw and a Virginia mulatto father," as stated in Vaughn's findings. Jefferson also was said to have destroyed all documentation attached to his mother, even going to extremes to seize letters written by his mother to other people.
What's the basis of these allegations? Any foundation in truth? None of it seems to be even vaguely hinted at by our article about Peter Jefferson; where is it coming from? --ESP (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Virginia mulatto" 

message: Peter Jefferson was not borned in Chesterfield County, as Chesterfield County formed in 1749  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.178.237.183 (talk) 00:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chesterfield County 

message: He was born on February 29, meaning his age should be 12, not 49. Quintessence62 (talk) 07:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am confused. What do you mean to say?–CaroleHenson (talk) 07:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Being born on leap years means your age is different. Quintessence62 (talk) 01:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Age at Death
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Issue 012

message: The following was left on my talkpage -
Next time you launch the newsletter, could you post up a statement of The Beatles quiz I created? The link is here. Thank you. Walt Disney
- if anyone is interested. LessHeard vanU 12:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Wow, Kingboyk's back on the job. Good to see. Maybe I'll return someday... who knows? —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 03:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only because for a while I was just about the only active member left! Yes, please do come back, we need you! --kingboyk 12:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome back, Kingboyk!
Talk:Sacramental character

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Indelible mark and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 26#Indelible mark until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 12:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Indelible mark" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Indelible spiritual mark and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 2#Indelible spiritual mark until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 11:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Indelible spiritual mark" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Wikipedians in Wellington

message: Angela will be in NZ, 9-11 May. Probably on Wikia business, but some of us are in both camps and would like to meet her anyway.
Is this at last the "excuse" for an Absolutely Positively MediaWiki Meetup in or near the capital?
(Who said "gathering nuts in May"?)
Robin Patterson 12:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm up for an Absolutely Positively MediaWiki Meetup sometime. Karora 10:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Meet in May?
Talk:1932 San Ciprián hurricane

message: The biggest problems in the article are the spelling and grammar errors. The content is OK, though the storm history, ideally, should be expanded. I'm not really sure what "Damage from the 1932 hurricane affected 49 municipalities" refers to in the first part of the impact section. Is there any more impact in the Lesser Antilles? Hurricanehink (talk) 18:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the island that the hurricane primarily affected was Puerto Rico, not Puetro Rico. Please be more careful of your spelling. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This opens up a good question.  Does wikipedia have a spell check function?  If not, why not?  Thegreatdr 19:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:City of Coventry Scout County (The Scout Association)

message: I have consulted with another editor - outside of Scouting.  Assuming good faith, I'm afraid that I cannot see that these new sites fit in with Wikipedia as they appear effectively nothing more than a list of branches of The Scout Association.  For further information on this please see the section Wikipedia is not a soapbox on Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, notably the section on advertising.  Even when open to Groups of all Associations these pages were of suspect standard, and closing them to independent Groups has not helped in any way.  
I suggest returning them to their original format, a new format that allows all Scouting in a County to be reported, or, alternatively, deleted as inappropriate.  -- DiverScout (talk) 18:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:R.

message: In Spanish mode R et P., was used for botanical authority
Ruiz and Pavon
--Penarc 12:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  R for Ruiz 

message: (Page in Sp)
--Penarc 12:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link Spanish

message: Please share your thoughts in the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Letters with a period should always be disambiguated. BD2412 T 16:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Letters with a period should always be disambiguated]]
Talk:Pierre Boucher

message: My family has told me that I'm descended from Pierre Boucher through Pierre Boucher de la Bruère. Can anyone substantiate claims that the latter is descended from the former? - Lunasspecto (talk) 01:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Progeny
Talk:Pieter Burman the Elder

message: At the moment "Pieter Burman" redirects to the "Pieter Burmann" disambiguation page. But:
i) competent classical scholars spell the name Burman (incompetent ones spell it Burmann)
ii) -man is the normal Dutch ending
iii) historians of classical scholarship call him and his nephew Burman, e. g. J. E. Sandys, A History of Classical Scholarship II (Cambridge 1908) 443-4, 455; R. Pfeiffer, History of Classical Scholarship from 1300 to 1850 (Oxford: OUP, 1976) 162; Gudemans Imagines Philologicae, the ultimate source of the photos here, I imagine
iv) For the younger Burman, the Album Academicum van het Athenaeum Illustre en van de Universiteit van Amsterdam  (Amsterdam 1913) 14 (and tables III, 2 and IV, 1) give his name as Burman
It looks like Burmann is a mistranslation of the Latin Burmannus, influenced perhaps by the dominance of German scholarship in the field.
Ideally Burman should then be the name of the article and Burmann the redirect  —Preceding unsigned comment added by N p holmes (talk • contribs) 06:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Spelling
Talk:Pietro Bracci

message: I took the following Italian language paragraph out of the article. It seems to suggest that Bracci's descendants lost possession of many of his works in the 1950s. It is not referenced, but I wouldn't remove an English version.
:I disegni di Pietro Bracci erano conservati dagli eredi dello scultore a Palazzo Bracci nell'archivio di famiglia, come attestato dalla Costanza di Gradara nel suo libro. L'alienazione del palazzo da parte dell'ultimo erede, il barone Alessandro Trocchi, marito di Maria Bracci, nei primi anni '50, vede la sparizione con gli arredi, di buona parte dell'archivio. Passato, per volontà del barone alla Mensa Vescovile di Civitacastellana,si deve al tenace operato del vescovo che, quanto rimasto, fosse restaurato e consevato nell'archivio vescovile di Civitacastellana a Nepi. La vendita dei disegni nel 1960 invece, da parte di un antiquario "nobile di San Miniato", ad una galleria di New York, non trova riscontro nella genealogia della famiglia, sopratutto a seguito della sua dichiarazione di averli ricevuti in dono da una sua zia.
(Apologies for forgetting to sign the above on 29 March. Grafen (talk) 16:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed paragraph
Talk:George of Hesse-Darmstadt

message: It´s false and dishonest. The Prince George of Hesse-Darmstadt conqueror Gibraltar for the future Charles III, king of Castile and Aragon not for the British.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.145.101.46 (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's just say "conqueror of Gibraltar" in the lead and explain the beginning of British rule in the body of the article, piping it to the subsection of History of Gibraltar dealing with this detail. It's Prince George's biography, and I would say that other things (such as his being the Viceroy of Catalonia for 3 years or the head of the Austrian Army in the WOSS) are more relevant for the lead than the details of Gibraltar's history after its capture (whether for Archduke Charles or the British). In any case, what is sourced about those details is the following: Poor Jordi conquered Gibraltar for Archduke Charles in 1704 and, after he left, there began a progressive (in fact, Archduke Charles landed in Gibraltar in 1705, this being the first Spanish soil he stood on) de facto control of Gibraltar by the British which led to a formal transfer in 1713. --Imalbornoz (talk) 09:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince George of Hesse-Darmstadt conqueror for the british ?
Talk:Marie Adélaïde of Savoy

message: Under the section "Dauphine of France", it says, "fever which escalated in measles." This should be rewritten. As is, it suggests that she had a fever which resulted in measles. I thought measles was a disease that involved fever. It should probably be rewritten as "fever which turned out to be measles" or, perhaps more precisely, "measles which resulted in a fever which escalated."--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 12:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measles
Talk:Princess Maria Anna Victoria of Savoy

message: Refference "de Saint-Allais 1817, p. 92." is about her sister Therese DOB in 1686. Maria Anna Vittoria was born 10 Sep 1683. Her grave has her DOB as 1683. Miloradovan (talk) 10:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth.
Talk:George Melford

message: Error: The link for Dracula (1931) points to the Tod Browning-directed English language version rather than Melford's film. WHPratt (talk) 20:21, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed JudahH (talk) 04:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Queen Ann (Pamunkey chief)

message: There seems to be confusion about who the younger and senior John Wests were.  John West senior, a colonel, was also said to have been a partner of Cockacoeskie and to have fathered several sons with her, including one named John West.  Was the senior John West supposedly affiliated with Queen Anne, too?  Maybe her 20-year-old interpreter was her cousin, not her son.  If her son, which John West was the father?--Parkwells (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: John West, son and father

message: How do you lead the tribe do you lead it alone or does someone help you when your sick? 107.219.69.14 (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do you lead
Talk:Hokuetsu Seppu

message: Is there any particular reason why this page is not located at Hokuetsu Seppu? There should not be any need to distinguish between similarly named topics. I have created a redirect, but without a convincing reason, I suggest moving this page there. Bendono 12:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem as far as I’m concerned. I don’t remember why I chose to append “book,” but I think it was because of something I saw in the guidelines.Fwiw, my copy of the Iwanami book is the 35th printing issued in 1988; is the rationale for changing the republication date to 1978 (22nd printing) that the 22nd printing is a 改版? I also have an earlier issue (18th printing from 1971), but the only real difference is that they re-set the type in a more-modern face; i.e., using post-war instead of pre-war–style glyphs. Jim_Lockhart 14:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the response. I went ahead and moved the page.As for the reprinting date, yes, I changed it to 1978 because it was a 改版. Actually, I was a little surprised to find the reprint date listed in the bibliography which lead me to look it up. Now that I think about it though, I suppose a 改版 and a reprint are different things, though. My copy from 1990 is the 40th reprint. Bendono 14:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I’m a little busy with work right now, otherwise I would have done it immediately. Your rationale for the republication date is reasonable enough, especially given that the glyphs are different and the printing, better (as far as I can tell, there are no content changes). I think an argument could be made for citing 1990 as well, though, if the date is followed by 発行.Some day I’m going to get around to filling that article out with more from the Japanese article, and possibly some material of my own based on copies I have of the book as the English translation. Happy editing, Jim_Lockhart 14:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Sidney Olcott

message: The Biography section of this article seems to go pretty far against impartiality rules; having a sort of 'narrative tone' as if written by Olcott's publicist. Some examples to clear up my point:
"...he became one of the first great directors of the motion picture business."
"...were able to lure the increasingly successful Sidney Olcott away from Biograph. "
"...In 1910 Sidney Olcott demonstrated his creative thinking when he made Kalem Studios..."
"Despite making the studio owners very rich men, they refused to increase his salary beyond the $150 a week he was then earning."
"The Kalem Company never recovered from the mistake of losing Olcott..."
The section is also just poorly written at points. Example:
"Of Irish ancestry, and knowing that in America there was a huge built-in Irish audience, Olcott went to Ireland where he made a film called A Lad from Old Ireland."
Not to mention that throughout the entirety of the, relatively heavily detailed, ~9 paragraph section, there is only one source cited - Olcott's resting place. 
I feel that this should be edited down significantly, removing claims that can't be qualified and fixing the tone.
Aun7010 (talk) 13:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written biography section