lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Julia Peyton-Jones

message: This page should not be deleted, because Julia Peyton Jones is the Director of the Serpentine Gallery in London, which is a very prestigious organisation, and has one of London's highest visitor figures. She is an extremely big name in the UK and international art world. Back up information can be found in http://www.telegraph.co.uk/fashion/main.jhtml?xml=/fashion/2006/07/09/stjulia09.xml
*It is much better to have the reference in the article from the start, but I have added it, removed personal biographical material unsupported by the reference, and removed the tag. It would be highly advisable to find additional references and expand the article.DGG 20:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This peacock article should probably mention past criticism of her remuneration, e.g. her 60% pay rise in 2012 described here. Malick78 (talk) 09:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism?
Talk:Pizza Corner

message: major rivals of pizza corner include pizza hut, domino's not smokin joes as indicated.
122.164.190.169 15:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rivals

message: I believe the reference to "Canada", under country may be owing to a place called Pizza corner in Canada - see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pizza_Corner. I am going to delete the Canada reference as the article makes no other reference to it. If this is incorrect feel free to revert. Trugster 16:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible confusion 
Talk:List of environmental books

message: Here is an example of a list available in two formats.
*List of production battery electric vehicles
*List of production battery electric vehicles (table)
-- Wavelength (talk) 17:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two formats (one a table) 

message: I feel that this list should be limited to those books that have an article.  This ensures that only notable books would be listed. I have deleted all books without an article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limit list to books which have an article 

message: I am starting this section for books which seem to be not quite appropriate for inclusion on the list, but which might be of interest. 
*Flush!: The Scoop on Poop throughout the Ages -- Wavelength (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entries withheld 

message: Recently, One Fish, Two Fish, Crawfish, Bluefish was removed from the list, with the explanation "it is more of a cookbook than env book".  Even though it is a cookbook, it is also an environmental book because the recipes are "specifically chosen for their environmental sustainability".  
Furthermore, it empowers consumers to make positive changes which benefit the environment.  Many of the changes which consumers can make to benefit the environment are beneficial indirectly, and therefore books about them might be classified in other fields.  However, they are still environmental books. -- Wavelength (talk) 04:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''One Fish, Two Fish, Crawfish, Bluefish''  

message: "Non-fiction" (professed to be) and openly stated "Fiction" are two separate articles.  99.181.152.251 (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Non-fiction" (professed to be) and openly stated "Fiction" are two separate articles. 

message: As a part of #ShutDownAcademia, a group of graduate students has organized an event with the goal of expanding this list (FlipTheList). I've reached out to the organizers and explained our notability rules for books (WP:NBOOK). For now they are compiling a spreadsheet offsite of likely candidates and are including Wikidata Q#s. Hopefully we can wrangle some editors from WikiProject Environment for an article creation drive. If any wayward editors come by here and need help, feel free to send them my way. gobonobo + c 16:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the spreadsheet and article template. gobonobo + c 12:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: FlipTheList
Talk:Chereme

message: How can a chereme be considered obsolete and the same as a phoneme when the function is so different. In sign language you can have multiple parts happen at the same time something that is physically impossible in speech. GerardM 15:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The change came when researchers did brain scans and found that cheremes were processed in the same parts of the brain as the phonemes of oral languages. Thus a 'chereme' is a bit like a 'toneme' - English may not have them, but they're cognitively equivalent to the C's and V's and stress English does have. It's a theoretical claim that the difference is merely one of the medium used for language, that all human language is essentially the same. That belief may turn out to be wrong, but it's the current orthodoxy. It's probably also motivated to accord SL's respect by getting them accepted as real languages. kwami 17:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It surprises me that linguists will accept a word whose root is "sound" for something as silent (usually) as a handshape, or that linguists, usually so fond of coining new words, don't want this one. Cheremes (or must I say "sign-language phonemes" - an expression whose awkwardness illustrates the need for this word?) won't be processed in exactly the same part of the brain as phonemes (sorry, "sound-phonemes"?) - mirror neurons will fire in the part of the brain responsible for hand, face and body movement. --Hugh7 (talk) 07:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

message: I don't know what all those curly brackets signify, so I couldn't do anything to make the Greek work for "hand" appear.--Hugh7 (talk) 07:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Greek letters not working
Talk:Dynamic mechanical analysis

message: Notice: As part of a class project, two other students and I are rewriting this page, and we plan to combine it with Dynamic Mechanical Spectroscopy. Our article should be posted by April. Drafts may appear prior to then. Let me know if there's something you think we're overlooking, we'd be happy to fix it.
Cheers,
AKolt (talk) 22:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class project 

message: The graphs currently in the article are of poor presentation quality.  The biggest issue is that there is no identification of which curves are for which axis!  Other issues include the number of digits in the axis tick labels, and peculiar was of writing temperature. —DIV (137.111.13.4 (talk) 00:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphs 
Talk:Thomas Agro

message: This was a good article; just tried to edit it more closely into an encyclopedia entry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogermx (talk • contribs) 15:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edited

message: Vinnie in Goodfellas was based on Vincenzo 'Vinnie' Aloi not Thomas Agro. In his book 'Wiseguy', Henry Hill states that Aloi was incarcerated in Lewisburg with him and that he cooked sauces for the pasta dishes they would have but used too many onions. This is alluded to in Goofellas as the character Vinnie makes the sauce and the voice over states he used too many onions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.54.216 (talk) 00:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Goodfellas
Talk:Bradford (disambiguation)

message: This addition: (cur) (last)  15:51, 20 May 2007 131.111.141.139 (Talk) (2,164 bytes) (Added *Bradford, the major settlement within the City of Bradford, mentioned below) was me, sorry, wasn't signed in so it hasn't put my name against it. My bad. This comment was left by §©ʁİƃƀȴıŋ’ Ƨł₥ȫȠ 15:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition of [[Bradford]]
Talk:Chlamydia felis

message: I expanded the article I gathered with two other classmates. The original introduction was kept intact except for a slight modification for the first sentence for the sake of making the cite transition from my sandbox to the article easier. This is my first edit on an article, so please let me know if there are any glaring issues. I also think that the article has been expanded enough for it to no longer be classified as a stub article. Fairy faecalis (talk) 00:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed to C-class. May not quite be there (ref fixes needed), but close enough. David notMD (talk) 02:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Expanded 

message: The genome section describes how coding for proteins was investigated, but then provides no information about those proteins. David notMD (talk) 10:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genome
Talk:Sterlington, Louisiana

message: Aren't some parts of Sterlington in Union Parish? Because some places like the Jowers are within city limits yet are beyond the Union-Ouachita parish boundary (which is the northern end of the Ouachita River cutoff bridge of LA 2. DudeWithAFeud (talk) 06:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sterlington in Union Parish
Talk:Farmerville, Louisiana

message: fdjfguaildahgjksfhdilaushdidsghlaik.sdhgivuaksfgaisfdhlkjashdfiausdbakjsfjknlufh
               i love her!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Farmerville is a largest town  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.197.246.54 (talk) 18:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Template talk:Overline

message: Is it possible to make the line not be coloured black? – SmiddleTC@ 16:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably not too hard for someone to code, but when would you need it to be another color? --Brandon Dilbeck 05:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Like this? --Abdull 19:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Rather than use a template, you can use the combining diacritical mark U+0305 (combining overline).  Example: x̅.  The overline will be the same colour as the surrounding text. Needless to say, this is useful only for single letters (or very short strings), and appropriate only when the overline is semantically significant (as opposed to purely decorative). —Psychonaut 18:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Could Template:Strikethrough be added to See also? Olli Niemitalo (talk) 20:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: When this template is used within  or ,  and  is produced respectively. In the Chrome and Safari browsers this shows up as an unnaturally thick (almost bolded) overline, which is a little ugly but passable. On Firefox, however, the overline shows up thin like normal but lowered just enough to be obscured by the tops of the letters, completely messing up its purpose. This can be avoided by swapping the nesting order as in , but this fails for more complex equations (like ) for which the  template would need would need to be broken up, thereby defeating its whole purpose and making the underlying wikitext much messier. Do you all have any idea what issues within the template source code might be causing this discrepancy between browsers? OlliverWithDoubleL (talk) 07:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks fine to me (in all instances of the above). This might be a user-side issue. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug when used within {math} and {mvar} templates
Talk:Bob Pridden

message: Don't merge. Clean and leave as separate article.--dalegrett 16:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Danny Belisle

message: I've redirected the article Dan Belisle to this one, as they are both about the same person, and it seems to me the important information from that article is in this article. I've added the image to the top of the article, and corrected his weight slightly as per hockeydb. Silverfish (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from Dan Belisle
Talk:Four-phase logic

message: Re the notice for speedy deletion, I am the writer of the web page mentioned (http://www.rwilson.org.uk/ic_memories/four_phase.htm) and I'm also the author of this new Wikipedia article - it's the same material but slightly edited to give a less personal view.
:I personally think this topic is notable enough for Wikipedia, but the article seems like it's written as an essay, rather than in encyclopedic tone.  I recommend altering the article to have sections and to put some more third-party sources in.  Useight 18:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article should be deleted, but for different reasons. This article reference PMOS and/or NMOS logic which has not been manufactured for over 30 years.   Most chips today use CMOS logic and typically do not use this form of clock circuit.  This article is either obsolete or due for an extreme makeover. --71.245.164.83 (talk) 01:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, let's delete everything older than 25 years... -- idiot.83.255.39.183 (talk) 16:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Morathi

message: I just came back to this page since my last visit in December 06.  There is a massive style issue here.  I've done a samll amount of rewritting to correct the issue but i could do with a little help.  Also if anyone is adding something to the article please remember to reference it properly (see WP:FOOT)--Cailil  talk 16:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In universe 

message: I want to layout how I think this article should be rewritten.  First I think the character's history should be explain; ie which Army book she was first mentioned in what the different revisions changed etc.  Second, the fictional biography needs to be cut-down and brought into the WP:MOS style (as above).  And third, a note on the different models could be helpful.  Having said all that I have the ravening hordes, Storm of chaos and 6th edition rule books that mention Morathi so i can add this material.  If anyone has any other WP:RS sources please add that info--Cailil  talk 15:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for a rewrite
Talk:Brooklyn Stakes

message: Is this a misspelling? Should it be Questionnaire?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SciHound (talk • contribs) 15:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionaire

message: Putting this at MID, for historical importance. Dubious? Tigerboy1966 (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:Mondulkiri Province

message: I've removed the external links section and the one remaining link - it was a spam magnet. Feel free to put it back when there are some links that meet the guidelines at WP:EL. Cheers, Paxse 16:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This article is very confused about the date on which the Province was created!
The Infobox says 1959
The introduction says 1961
The History section says 1960
None of them has a directly quoted source and none of the sources quoted in the reference section seem relevant.
I have looked at statoids.com which suggests 1960 but have no other source to know which date is the correct one.
Can anybody help?
MWchat (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Dates 
Talk:Market Square Park

message: This paragraph is dubious:
"The square was donated to the city in 1854 by Augustus Allen and used as an open air produce market. Very near Allen's Landing, the original port of Houston, the downtown business district grew around the square. Early city landmarks included the briefly used Texas Capitol and White House. In addition, several City Halls rose and fell at Market Square, each destroyed by fire."
I may have even edited this paragraph some years ago and used this citation myself. Regardless, I have better sources now.Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Challenging paragraph
Talk:Kwon Ki-ok

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 12:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Middlewich Folk and Boat Festival

message: Can someone please provide a reference to who refers to MFAB as "Glastonbury On Water".  A google search brings up no references apart from: No music venues until the folk and boat festival in June, when the festival is here is is like a folk version of Glastonbury, the Monsters of Folk. Every pub has a group of people with Beards and tankards singing about canals and how wonderful life was 100 years ago. from Knowhere (http://knowhere.co.uk/4829_music.html) Salinae 16:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Glastonbury On Water

message: There was an awful lot of blue links to articles which were obviously not related to this festival - making a mockery of Wikpedia. Rather than try to invent new names for these people/bands I simply removed the square brackets. Most of them are not notable. I created genuine links for "Coope Boyes and Simpson" and for the "Oysterband" which were bady formatted, making them previously red links. Do we really need to know every Tom  Dick and Harry who appeared at this festival? Surely a couple of highlight names from each year would be enough. Ogg (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom dick and Harry 
Talk:Crunchy Frog

message: J.K. Rowling, writer of the Harry Potter book series, has admitted that this sketch is what she got the idea for the Chocolate Frogs and Cockroach Cluster that appear in the Harry Potter books. Perhaps this should be included in a "Popular Culture" section in the article?
http://www.hp-lexicon.org/wizworld/candy.html#1
There's the site I got this information from, specifically Note 1 at the bottom of the page. 188.57.40.92 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rowling appearance

message: Praline and Parrot (who is also sick)? Could this be a hint to the upcoming Dead Parrot sketch? Or am I reading too much into it? 188.57.40.92 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hint for Parrot sketch?

message: In German police film TV series TATORT ("Crime Scene"), in episode "Frau Bu lacht" ("Mrs. Bu Laughs") from November 26, 1995, a Chinese man consumes a confection called "Knusperfrosch" ("Crispy Frog") and there's a scene mimicking that from Monthy Python. Throughout the episode, the guy is seen eating it, and only near the end he is asked by the police officers what it is and explains it to them. 2003:C8:BBCD:4618:9481:C954:5280:FAA3 (talk) 02:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance on German TV 

message: In the version of the script at montypython.net (presumably of a live performance), the Inspector is unnamed but his companion is called Constable Clitoris. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Policemen's names?
Talk:The Invention of Hugo Cabret

message: The plot summary may be too long.SUPERBEES Talk  05:20, 5 October 2007
Unfortunately, it is now far too short. Plus the word "fantastic" is used, meaning this was written by someone with an obvious bias. While I am not one to rewrite the summary, someone should get to it some time soon because the book ficken roxs everyones sox off!!!
Well, now it's non-existent, let's split the difference here, find a healthy medium between too much and nothing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.68.160.24 (talk) 19:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Section 

message: I updated the section concerning the movie adaptation. Any other details found on the net would make a great addition. Snookumz (talk) 23:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Update 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MLauba (talk) 12:49, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I recently read this book, and I feel like Hugo and Isabelle are most definitely not the only main/important characters. I think Georges Méliès should be mentioned, and possibly his wife, too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.155.33 (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: I removed the following line from the character description of Etienne, as it was out of place: "Etienne does not appear in the film "Hugo." We don't need to mention the connection to the film in the description of characters since the article is focused on the novel. Any discussion of the film should appear in the Adaptations section. Perhaps there will someday be a "Differences from the film" section, but perhaps not since those sections are often riddled with original research. Please use removed quote above as you see fit. --Roseclearfield (talk) 03:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences from film
Talk:Willowridge High School (Pretoria)

message: Nearly all of this article needs be rewritten. It looks like some one copied most of the school pamphlet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glubbdrubb (talk • contribs) 11:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuetral POV
Talk:Homer, Louisiana

message: Regarding this material, I think it needs to be severely trimmed.  First of all, this article is 18K long.  We're going to have 10% of that be about the arrest last week of the mayor?  When she's not even indicted, let alone tried?  That's my undue weight argument.  Secondly, the tone of this material is sensationalistic.  She hasn't been tried, so the allegations against her shouldn't be stated as fact.  That's my NPOV argument.  Finally, who cares what she could face if convicted?  That's just adding up maximum possible sentences, it ignores sentencing guidelines, and it's predictive and not factual anyway.  Thoughts?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 03:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exceedingly undue weight, NPOV issues with arrest of the mayor 

message: This one is incited and not sure if notable?
* John Sparks Patton, educator from Claiborne Parish who first advocated taxpayer-funded school textbooks; former member of the Louisiana Public Service Commission FloridaArmy (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Notables
Talk:Symphony No. 46 (Haydn)

message: Landon's Esterhazy Volume (II) mentions that "The Poco Adagio" is a kind of sophisticated siciliano, which Haydn had used so effectively in an aria from [his opera] Le pescatrici two years earlier."  Does he mean that Haydn used a specific aria from that opera and make a movement out of it?  That would be noteworthy.  But, he could mean that the "siciliano" was something he had employed earlier which would be considerably less interesting in my opinion.  DavidRF (talk) 17:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second movement and Le pescatrici 

message: Besides this one and the Sinfonia H-dur of Georg Matthias Monn, actually, how many 18th-century B (not B-flat, sometimes contemporary references will leave the flat off and be confusing) major symphonies are there known to have been...? Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Very rare indeed.  This list at List_of_symphonies_by_key#B_major is meant to be thorough.  If you know of any, add them to the list. DavidRF (talk) 21:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symphonies in B (natural major, 18th century)
Talk:434 Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron

message: RCAF 434 Squadron
This is a link to RCAF 434 Squadron covering the years 1943-1945. I created the site and now wish to have it added as a link to RCAF related sites. Also to start a history of 434 Squadron for wikipedia.
http://rcaf434squadron.squarespace.com/welcome/
434alan 16:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled