lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hannah Waterman

message: I removed the link to Hannah Waterman's Body Blitz becaue it just appears to be a site promoting the video and has no other valuable content. If we must have information about the DVD then perhaps we should link to a review or something as a reference in the main body of the text. I'm sure there's one online somewhere. Paul Largo (talk) 17:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now the video is attracting some controversy I think we should include it. I've added to the paragraph on Body Blitz, adding Natalie Cassidy's recent comments on the matter. Paul Largo (talk) 20:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hannah Waterman's Body Blitz 
Talk:Arnold Zwicky

message: Need to explain why this person rates an encyclopedia article.  See notability guidelines. --Bookgrrl 03:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know much about Zwicky personally, but he's a name that every linguistics student who takes morphology will see.  He's probably the foremost expert on clitics.  I vote he stays. Straughn 21:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's still any concern about whether or not Zwicky is notable, then we can cite the fact that he was elected to be an LSA fellow in 2006, which is essentially the linguistics hall of fame.  http://www.lsadc.org/info/lsa-fellows-year.cfm --Paigemont (talk) 01:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A highly intelligent linguist, and he's an expert on the clitic? If he was not gay, id say he was a...Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Zwicky is a very prolific and enthusiastic lgbt activist, as can be seen on his blog and website. In my opinion, this constitutes a very important segment of his life and personality and deserves a section of its own or at least a mention.
However, I would leave this to the people who are more fluent in English than myself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.198.18.122 (talk) 15:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Gay activism
Talk:Hannelore Elsner

message: Date of death is 21st April 2019 not 20th April as written here 80.151.9.187 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  DoD 

message: Gerda: ALT5 led me to look at the article and refs. Tagesschau talks about nominations: "Geschrieben und gedreht wurde das für drei Bundesfilmpreise nominierte und in Cannes als deutscher Wettbewerbsbeitrag gezeigte Schwarz-Weiß-Epos von Gisela Elsners Sohn Oskar Roehler." FAZ talks about awards: "Die Rolle der suizidgefährdeten Schriftstellerin Hanna Flanders in Oskar Roehlers Spielfilm „Die Unberührbare“ brachte ihr im Jahr 2000 den Deutschen Filmpreis, den Deutschen Kritikerpreis und den Bayerischen Filmpreis ein." The article doesn't seem to properly match the claims with the refs. Please check. I don't have time to try to resolve this. Jmar67 (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three awards
Talk:Lists of Universal Pictures films

message: Universal is also distributing Flint Strong. Please add it to the section with undated films. 
76.10.139.234 (talk) 15:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Terasail[Talk] 14:11, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 September 2020 

message: Can you add the note "distribution only; produced by Will Packer Productions" to the slot of Praise This, please? 76.10.152.160 (talk) 20:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Hello 10:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2020
Talk:Mariana Renata

message: Mariana Renata is one of the Indonesian icon for a beauty soap product, Lux. She and the other three Lux stars, Tamara Blezynski, Dian Sastrowardoyo, and Luna Maya have each just starred in their own short movie. It is part of the Lux campaign 'Your Beauty is your Power' or 'Kecantikanmu adalah Kekuatanmu'. The theme of these four short movies are 'About women, made by women, for women.'These movies can be seen in previews of movies in the certain theatres in Jakarta and Surabaya. After that the four short movies can be watched in TV, in RCTI and SCTV channel. Mariana Renata and Luna Maya's movies are scheduled to be rolled on 10-11 September at RCTI at 20.00. Mariana's short movie is called 'The MatchMaker'. In this movie, she stars as Kay, a young, supple, and friendly woman who likes to match-make her friends. Until one day she meets her perfect guy at a bookstore who turns out to be the owner of the bookstore. But at the end, she match-makes her perfect guy with her other guy friend. This movie tells us that our beauty can be made into the power of making others happy, and not only keeping happiness to yourself but sharing it with others.This movie is another one of Kalyana Shira Films produced by Nia Dinata and directed by Cinzia. The other three movies are 'The Big Day', starring Tamara Blezynski, 'Bukan Kesempatan Yang Terlewat', starring Dian Sastrowardoyo, and 'Maya, Raya, Daya', starring Luna Maya. 'Maya, Raya, Daya' and 'Bukan Kesempatan Yang Terlewat' are two other movies from Miles Films produced by Mira Lesmana. While the other two movies starring Tamara Blezynski and Mariana Renata are under Kalyana Shira Films and produced by Nia Dinata. These movies were made in order to tell women to be strong and to explore their inner and outter beauty. These four short movies will be sent to the International Film Festival in Pusan, Korea.
(unsigned)
I am the father of Mariana and would like bring to your kind attention that I never have been of Jewish religion origine. So I would like from you to correct that wrong information.
Andre Dantec  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.201.137.172 (talk) 15:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: unsigned comments
Talk:Hannes Swoboda

message: Because this a BLP that needs a fair amount of cleanup I added the WikiProject Austria banner and flagged it as needing immediate attention. Also, I added cleanup tags to the article. momoricks (make my day) 05:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs attention 

message: Hannes Swoboda is an enemy of democracy. He is a well known supperter of bloody dictator Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Inspectortr (talk) 18:54, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You need a new hobby. Gerald Jarosch (talk) 22:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  My need of a new hobby is irrelavent. This has no relevance with Swobado's dictatorsip love.Inspectortr (talk) 00:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictator Suuporter  
Talk:Hannes Wader

message: The suspicion did not come just because of what he sang. Terrorist Gudrun Ensslin had used his flat to do explosion experiments. She committed an arson attack on a department store, fled when an appeal was denied, and when she freed her boyfriend one person was shot. Wader claimed she had used a false name and he had not known of her activities. Knopffabrik (talk) 04:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrorism
Talk:Hanni Wenzel

message: Because she was injured she couldn't compete in 1982 Alpine Skiing World Championships. 213.225.2.242 (talk) 21:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No competing in 1982 World Championships  
Talk:Hanno Möttölä

message: I don't think that Hanno Mottola is a small forward. I think he's a center or at least a power forward. And is he 2,08 or 2,11 meters? MontanNito 21:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Small forward?

message: meaning, not at all. 
hes a PF-C.
--ArnoldPettybone 18:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hes a small forward as I'm young and restless. 
Talk:Hans-Christian Ströbele

message: #
#  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.160.121.173 (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Parlamentarisches Kontrollgremium" "Deutscher Bundestag"

message: Mahler had a really complicated history, but it is clear, that he in fact (co-)founded the RAF.--Ralfdetlef (talk) 18:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahler
Talk:Hans-Gert Pöttering

message: Have we got a pic of this man?  It would vastly improve the article and would make for a far better picture than that eyesore we have now... DoomsDay349 04:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We had some good pics, but they have been deleted for some reason..S. Solberg J. 23:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic? 

message: This edit  led to speculation in Tony Barber's Financial Times BrusselsBlog  of deliberate promotion of Pöttering’s candidacy on Wikipedia.--Rumping (talk) 09:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qualificated 

message: In the youtube video cited as a source, Pöttering is in fact talking about the European Parliament´s participation in 75 % of EU legislation, a figure which would increase to 100 % participation under the Lisbon treaty. There is no mention of the EU passing 100 % of national law. The Subtitles in the video are misleading. The source, apparently uploaded by the eurosceptic UKIP party, is not reliable. The passage in the article should be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.153.68.6 (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  75 % of national law figure
Talk:Eminence, Kentucky

message: The overhead view is an interesting image and should be kept in the article, but I was wondering if anyone has a more up-close image of a significant aspect of the town that can be used for the infobox. Also, I'm not sure of the usefulness of including a PDF brochure - it's not just visually unattractive but it's very much in the detail weeds that wouldn't be useful to most readers. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 20:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Hans-Jürgen Syberberg

message: 2/3 of the article isn't a quote from Ian Buruma. This needs to be corrected. 2A02:AA1:1009:DE37:A815:CD81:AEB1:DB75 (talk) 18:24, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Buruma
Talk:Hans-Ola Ericsson

message: This article was quite rightly tagged for its resemblance to . Determining if the material was ours first might have been very difficult but for the sleuthing at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 February 6 by User:Mr Stephen, who suggested there the following:
Compare their Jon Appleton with ours, especially "He wanted to have children but unfortunatelly didnt"—pure WP.
While this article lacks the evidence of early natural evolution that can help resolve these matters, the Appleton article is easier to defend. In addition to the sentence about the subject's reproductive hopes, we can see earlier evolution in such edits as this and this. If they've copied us on one, there's good reason to believe they've copied us on the other. 
Thanks to both User:Mr Stephen and User:Jubileeclipman for noting and evaluating these concerns. If it is not already, I'll make sure that the site is listed at WP:Mirrors. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns
Talk:Pleasureville, Kentucky

message: Back in 06, an anon added the claim that Pleasurville was named for a bordello located in town.  No reference provided. Never heard that explanation myself, despite having had family in the area for years.  Can anyone provide a reference for the name?  --Clay Collier (talk) 10:38, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Rennick. — LlywelynII 16:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Origin? 

message: It's unclear whether this was the first fort that Rennick mentions or another one even before that at a different location. Should we merge? or does anyone have a source to clear this up? — LlywelynII 16:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Low Dutch Station]]
Talk:Hans-Ulrich Wehler

message: I don't remember the proper "This article needs to be..." template to put up, but this article needs to be reformatted into a brief introduction with further detail in sections below.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oconnor663 (talk • contribs) 20:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  separating the article into sections 

message: Through it is great to see much new info added to this page, and I'm not certain how this all works, but a great deal of the content on this page seems to the same as the article on Wehler on the . Not sure if this is a problem or not.--A.S. Brown (talk) 04:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: not a problem. I personally wrote the section at "Conservapedia" and hold the copyright and added it to this article.  To be more exact, I originally wrote the material for citizendium.org in April 2008, then copied it to Conservapedia in Oct. 2009. See page history at Citizendium for details Rjensen (talk) 04:30, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for clearing that up. Also great work on this page, which adds much to it. --A.S. Brown (talk) 04:48, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copywrite vio?
Talk:Hans A. Linde

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject!  JubalHarshaw 17:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hans von Spakovsky

message: Wow!  Talk about a biased POV!   68.45.104.173 (talk) 06:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it really is a hatchet piece, even by Wikipedia standards. CsikosLo (talk) 17:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems to me that there are a substantial number of appropriate, reliable sources which could be incorporated into this article. The article seems to lack detail on one of the most notable aspects of the subject, which is the dispute over his nomination by George W. Bush to the Federal Election Commission. I've collected a few potential sources below, with the aim of expanding and improving our coverage.
Justice Department tenure:
* 
* 
* 
Confirmation hearings:
* 
* 
* 
* 
Opinion/Editorial (may or may not be suitable, would need direct attribution):
* 
* 
* 
Any other thoughts, or sources, are welcome. MastCell Talk 18:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Created some material at this article and moved some to the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Created sentence and source at the John Fund article and copied part to here. Activist (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Slight revision of copying notice. Activist (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{copied}} 
Talk:Fort Knox, Kentucky

message: I've added a merge tag because the census designated place and the post are the exact same thing. Maintaining two seperate articles is, to be blunt, idiotic. If someone adds "Kentucky" to a link, the link points to the CDP, and if they don't, it links to the military fort article. Consequently, you have articles about military units linking to an article about the demographics of the place. As it is first and foremost an army post, I suggest merging into the Fort Knox article, as this has been the general consensus of the Military History Wikiproject.-- Nobunaga24 04:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge tag
Talk:Hans Berliner

message: His famous book is the vast majority of the interest in him. If you go to a chess club and somebody says his name, which will happen, they will be talking about his book. There is nothing here on it. Why is that? It is listed, with just the name and ICBN number, but no mention of the critical response to it. Surely he is also of interest to chess programmers, but his book is famous or infamous.76.105.216.34 (talk) 20:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're talking about The System, the See also section directs you to First-move advantage in chess#White wins with 1.d4.  I agree that it should be covered in this article too.  Quale (talk) 04:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is his book? 

message: AFAIK, "boar evaluation" can only be board evaluation. May I correct WP? Jswd (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boar or board? 

message: The editor who added the quotation, "it quickly became his main preoccupation", indicated in his edit summary that this was from Berliner's book, The System; but I do not have a copy from which I can verify this, and find a page number.  Can anyone help with this?
In the paragraphs about BKG, there are some sentences about evaluation functions and "transitions", and fuzzy logic is mentioned.  I have not been able to find this discussion in the sources available to me.  Can anyone direct me to a source that can be cited about this aspect of Berliner's research?  Bruce leverett (talk) 03:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some sources desired
Talk:Kangaroo Point, New South Wales

message: Perhaps, due to existing in both Hornsby (though I can't see it on a map) and Sutherland Shires, we should make this a disambig and move the content to Kangaroo Point, Sutherland, New South Wales - Quolnok 03:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I just found it, and made the other article, it appears to not be a suburb at all (just a geographical feature) and satellite images show no houses. Those facts and the fact that ours is bigger (not really an arguement) are good reasons to leave it as is. - Quolnok 03:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hans Brunhart

message: Page could definitely do with revision and expansion. He was Prime Minister for 15 years and surely there's a lot of sources avaliable. TheBritinator (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I had long forgotten that I had put this, but I have now taken the time to work on that. TheBritinator (talk) 12:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page revision
Talk:Hans Dijkstal

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Hans Florine

message: Article seems full of WP:PEACOCK and, generally, embellishments, especially an unnecessarily thorough and discussion about The Nose in the main section of the article.....the hyper focus on The Nose makes it look like Hans wanted this encyclopedic listing to publicize his speedclimbing on The Nose, rather than providing a balanced report on his accomplishments.
These "records" they all claim are unofficial totally.  No judges, timers, sanctioning entities, etc.  As such, I think much of the content is hearsay and WP:NOTABILITY.  These speedclimbing records are not a sanctioned sport.  Hearsay record-claims are not encyclopedic in nature.
I think a 1-2 sentence article, and link to his website, are more than enough.  Or a deletion of the article.  Wikipedia is being used to promote him.  I'd do an editor request for help shortly.Everestrecords (talk) 10:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Irving Abella

message: This: *  was broken. It could be a problem on my end of the connection, or with my browser, if it works for somebody else, it should be reverted (and please tell me if it does work for you, so I know something's wrong on my end). Edward Wakelin 03:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link worked fine for me, so I restored it.  71.77.4.92 20:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadian Who's Who link
Talk:Hans Hedberg

message: There's a Hans Hedsberg museum in Sweden, with a website that has a fair amount of biographical information on Hedsberg. Unfortunately, I do not speak Swedish, and translation sites are dubious quality. I (will have) included a link to it in the article, as at very least it provides evidence of the museum's existence, but optimally someone would be able to translate and expand the article with information from it. TypistMonkey (talk) 03:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish Museum Page
Talk:Hall of Fame Classic (basketball tournament)

message: Guardians Classic → College Basketball Experience Classic – Starting with the 2006 season, the NABC Guardians Classic, a NCAA Division I exempt men's basketball tournament, has been renamed to the "College Basketball Experience Classic" Torear3 03:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose per 'most common name' Wikipedia policy. 24.19.35.187 01:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:UCF Knights football

message: This is not an NCAA recognized Championship RMiller88 (talk) 22:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @RMiller88: There aren't any in FBS. —C.Fred (talk) 22:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

text: Source? I mean, when I go to the NCAA website and click on the link for the 2019 Division I football championship, the team winning it is North Dakota State. —C.Fred (talk) 12:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

text: The NCAA does not award a national championship at the FBS level. The national championships are awarded by NCAA-recognized selectors including the "College Football Playoff," the Associated Press, and indeed, the Colley Matrix, among others. The only authoritative source for recognized FBS (formerly 1-A) championships is the NCAA record book, which does recognized the UCF national championship. http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/football_records/2019/FBS.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CitrusCritter (talk • contribs) 19:54, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCF Football National Championship 

message: UCF bowl record should be at 5-6 after the Marshall game. ~Louay  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4270:18B9:2DAB:CD0F:3163:957F (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Thanks for letting us know this hadn't gotten updated. —C.Fred (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCF Bowl Record 

message: Remove the claimed national title in 2017 under accomplishments. There is no such thing as a claimed national title game. You either one the CFB playoff game you you didn’t. Clemson is in the P5 with one loss which is better than a undefeated team that only plays 2 teams in the power 5. Alabama lost in the National Championship and they beat auburn who UCF barley beat by over 20. You either make or you don’t and UCF did not. 2600:1700:E640:5140:81BB:DA7E:5A3F:5F61 (talk) 23:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. —Sirdog9002 (talk) 23:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

text: UCF was selected by the Colley Matrix as national champion in 2017. UCF claimed it. That's a claimed national title. The NCAA does not crown an official national champion for FBS football. There are selectors that name their own champions. The College Football Playoff is one of those selectors and is generally viewed as the de facto National Champion. However, they're still only one selector and other official selectors can name their own Champion. UCF beat Auburn in the Peach Bowl. Auburn beat the two CFP finalists earlier in the season. Alabama 26-14 and Georgia 40-17. Alabama did not beat Auburn that year. UCF can't win what they weren't selected to play for, but since the Colley Matrix did select them as national champions, the precedent is certainly there for them to claim it. 209.16.119.202 (talk) 15:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 August 2021 

message: Change UCF’s 2017 championship from Claimed to Unclaimed, as it was not an official championship. 2600:387:F:5618:0:0:0:6 (talk) 23:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 December 2021
Talk:Hans Otte

message: The German article has a lot about his educational background that isn't in the English article.  German-speaking Wikipedians, please translate and add to this article.  Thank you.  Badagnani 09:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do 
Talk:Hans Segers

message: He's probably not really 3.02 meters tall. Judging from the stands I'd guess he's around 1.75 meters tall. Rather small for a goalkeeper.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.209.55.160 (talk) 17:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Height