Talk:Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant

message: What is the Wikipedia policy on plagiarism? In the section 'Units 2 &3' a whole sentance, (The first of any new reactors would only be operational in about 2018.), is lifted from the source. Aren't quotation marks required? A referance is made to the article that the information came from but it is not indicated that the exact wording is by the author of the article rather than of the contributer.Kevinharbin (talk) 17:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: The content from the site "ProjectCensored" claims that a "report by MIT and Princeton scientists" concluded Shearon Harris could be "worse than Chernobyl".  The ultimate source of this story seems to be Counterpunch, the same extremist website I detail above.  As for the report, I can find no mention of it at either MIT or Princeton.   Counterpunch claims that "Bob Alvarez" was one of the study's co-authors.  Alvarez is not a scientist at MIT or Princeton, though.  He is the director of the anti-nuclear group STAR (Standing for Truth About Radiation), a member of the anti-nuclear group "Institute for Policy Studies", and one of the many "policy advisors" in the US Energy Department under Clinton's administration.  See:
* http://www.radiation.org/about/bio.html
The actual quote in the article is attributed to Bob Alvarez, not any scientist from MIT or Princeton.  As the statement is both inaccurate and potentially libelous, I am removing it as per WP policy.  FellGleaming (talk) 17:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add that information as a counterpoint to the article, but don't remove sources that you disagree with. (You have a history of censoring articles.) The article is citing the point of view of Project Censored, not inventing new information.Rndm85 (talk) 05:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of unsourced / inaccurate information 

message: WHY did you remove my fact and say not in source?  Its right here, I am reading it now.  What are you trying do do?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadmusdroad (talk • contribs) 20:25, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, but I disagree.  I removed the material.  Fell Gleaming(talk) 20:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't let Fell Gleaming bully you into leaving the article censored. When I last was editing the page, he was constantly removing any source that he disagreed with and threatening to have me banned from Wikipedia if I didn't let him censor the page.Rndm85 (talk) 04:53, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  REMOVE VALID SOURCE 

message: Firstly, the reference is lost. Link is broken. Either way, that source and statement needs to be challenged. As everyone knows, Unit 1 is in operation. What people might not know is that Unit 2 is about 50% complete. Also, they have built infrastructure for four units. Therefore, it would be incorrect to simply say that they paid so much for Unit 1. Most of what they spent was for Unit 1, but then there's a significant amount spent for Unit 2 and another portion spent for Units 3 and 4. Another point to make is that they paid the full cost of building a Fuel Handling Building for all four units, that price should not be included in "paying so much for just one unit". In conclusion, it seems that it'll be impossible to determine how much was spent on Unit 1 and how much was spent for the other three units. So if this comment is used, we will need to add the fact that a good portion spent was for the other three units that never came into existence. Also, HNP had to undergo extensive add-ons due to the TMI accident, which increased cost. Gilawson (talk) 00:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  if the other 3 units are never built, then it is the cost of the first unit. It's got to be bookkept somewhere, otherwise the cost for units
2-4 become infinite.  As for the costs of TMI add-ons, would you prefer they not have been done? TMI like Browns Ferry, 
pointed out key weaknesses in systems.  It's a good idea to fix those, not keep rolling the dice. --Patbahn (talk) 13:59, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost of Units 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061002000000/http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html to http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100725030831/http://www.projectcensored.org:80/top-stories/articles/4-nuclear-waste-pools-in-north-carolina/ to http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/4-nuclear-waste-pools-in-north-carolina/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/677401.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/4-nuclear-waste-pools-in-north-carolina/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607081310/http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/05/16/2897074/shearon-harris-shut-down-because.html to http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/05/16/2897074/shearon-harris-shut-down-because.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified