Talk:WCW Disney tapings

message: I am taking the google groups source out. I wish to remind a certain someone of something he said:
It has already been shown that according to Wikipedia policy, a Usenet post is NOT a suitable source for a Wikipedia article. You might want to attempt illustrating a different point, because your pen has run dry. - Chadbryant 13:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a personal attack by the way. Tyrenius 05:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It's an external link, not a source. HAND. - Chadbryant 07:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even as an external link I don't think it is really neccessary to have it there. The external itself is quite scrappy and is more a spoiler page than anything after reading it. By the way, just acting as a third party per WP:PW. Normy132 06:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. TruthCrusader 07:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

text: The "controversy" was only started because two specific users exist here only to fight any contribution I make to Wikipedia. There is nothing more to the situation than that. - Chadbryant 23:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Usenet post

message: *Report of results from first Disney Tapings in July 1993
There is a dispute over this external link. Kindly quote the exact part of policy/guidelines that supports your view (with ref to appropriate policy page). Tip: WP:EL might help. Remember this link is not being used as a source. No comments required: put them in another part of this page. Please don't sign the quotes, as they're not personal opinions - they're just quotes from policy. Thank you. 
===Include===
Sites that contain neutral and accurate material not already in the article. Ideally this content should be integrated into the Wikipedia article, then the link would remain as a reference, but in some cases this is not possible for copyright reasons or because the site has a level of detail which is inappropriate for the Wikipedia article.
===Exclude===
# Blogs, social networking sites (such as MySpace) and forums should generally not be linked to. However, there are exceptions, such as in cases where the article is about, or closely related to, the website itself, or where the website is of a particularly high standard.TruthCrusader 06:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any chance of reading the initial request I made above? Tyrenius 19:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: # Blogs, social networking sites (such as MySpace) and forums should generally not be linked to. However, there are exceptions, such as in cases where the article is about, or closely related to, the website itself, or where the website is of a particularly high standard.TruthCrusader 06:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any chance of reading the initial request I made above? Tyrenius 19:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Exclude

message: The article should have been reverted to the last non-"DickWitham" version before being protected. - Chadbryant 22:21, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That wouldn't be very smart, considering that would place the link in question that is the cause for protection back on the page. --Krusty Surfer Dude 12:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Protection

message: As it is not normal to link to blog, perhaps, Chad, you could make your case, as concisely as possible, stating:
*the content of the blog 
*the extra information it would give which is not in the article
*why it is not in the article
*what verification is there for the accuracy of the information in the blog
*is there any other informed editor who also supports its inclusion
*anything else
Tyrenius 11:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are you asking about blogs? The external link in question is to an archived Usenet post - and it is not being used as a source for the article. - Chadbryant 23:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you could explain what it IS being used for then. It seems that you are only linking to it due to it being a Google Groups posting. And, as you have already seen, Google Groups postings are suspect and questionable on Wikipedia. How do we know any of that information is correct? You or the original poster could be lying. --Krusty Surfer Dude 02:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ditto. Tyrenius 02:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: I thought the TV tapings moved from Orlando to Atlanta long before 2000 at Center Stage Theater? --Raderick 07:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlanta