lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Council circle

message: I started this article because I want to use a talking circle in my church group and wanted a good description of the practise. I have written what I was taught about talking circles, though they appear to have a lot of variation. 
This article could be part of a set of article discussing various ways of holding meetings/discussions. I could not find any pre-existing structure for this in Wikipedia.
AdamRetchless 22:08, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no Council circle page, so this should be renamed, with talking circle as a generic term for this type of aboriginal forum.
Talking circle as a generic term for it (which is citable), and a modern (as opposed to current) version of it can be described with citations, such as dispute resolution at the Rainbow Gatherings.
Then components of it, such as the talking stick can be implemented into it.
--John Bessa (talk) 15:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename to Council circle

message: This is the last good information for this page .
Wikipedia has near-zero credibility among scholars and, increasingly, the public; the edit staff has shrunk to near-zero because of abuse.  An attempt to explain this deprecating phenomena is "defective dominance" by unfortunate people with low-functioning minds who are, ironically, called "high-functioning."  Two pages I attempted to bring up to scholastic standards (for the benefit of aboriginals) have been "rationally reduced" to the level of concern that troubles educators: this page, and Talking stick.  In an attempt to address this problem I am creating a peer-reviewed wiki that will, in part, specialize in "last clean edits."  I would insert the "bias template," but I don't have the time -- simply creating a whole new wiki that addresses mental illness issues in its edit staff is actually a much simpler, quicker solution.
--John Bessa (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Last "clean" edit
Talk:Expect

message: Mmmm, ads.  I can expect the outcome of this... hfool 22:10, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: from VfD

message: if the script ends with the expect command interact you will be able to use expect to automate logins to manually
execute actions once logged in.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.63 (talk) 00:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  interact 

message: The section with the pros and cons is awkward. Does it make sense at all? Do other software tools have something similar? I guess a "Limitations" section would be more logical.
And more concretely, it's brutally, savagely stupid to consider a "con" of the tool the possibility of an admin storing passwords to automate logins. I guess bash, keyboards and disks also have such a "con" then.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.112.174.214 (talk) 02:09, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cons?
Talk:Stonecutters Island

message: The article contains the following:
:Murray House, ... , is made from granite columns which were imported from Manila and quarried on Stonecutter's Island.
If they were quarried on Stoncutters island, how could they be imported from Manila?. -- Chris j wood 22:21, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange statement 

message: Before 1997, It was the training and HQ Depot HKMSC (Hong Kong Military Service Corps).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.188.159.121 (talk) 14:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HKMSC 

message: Can someone check the Pinyin? Jogloran (talk) 07:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinyin 
Category talk:Stubs by region

message: I have removed the :Category:Geography stubs from this category, because in practice this category and its sub-categories are not sub-categories of the 'Geography stubs' category. The 'Geography stubs' category clearly says:
:This category is for stub articles about geographical locations.
However the country level sub-categories of 'Stubs by region' typically contain articles on any subject within that country, as opposed to just articles about locations within that country. -- Chris j wood 22:37, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added the template  into the main category page. This is to make navigation easier for stub articles. However, most importantly, this is to create awareness among users to pay more attention to these stub articles. The purpose here is to decrease the number of stub articles here and improve the quality of them. --Siva1979Talk to me 16:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice
Talk:West End Games

message: As of 9-28-2010 West End Games is working to sell the rest of their games and close operations.  This came directly from the owner.
The owner wants the name to die, thus its the end of the West End Games Era. Sad
Does anyone have a citation for the above?  I'd love to see it verified. rjbs (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, West End Games is still owned by Eric Gibson, and as a still existing and not-yet-disbanded company. The name of one of them, the man's name or the company's name, is still the official owner of the Junta game and may be the owner of other games aswell, those that as Junta weren't sold by Gibson. Junta hasn't been published since 2005, ok, but we currently have a man, a company and the property of a game. No commercial activity, ok, but even in that case, there is an officially existing company being the recipient of a game's patent. West End Games sleeps, that's all, and we simply can not pretend it's definitely dead. Kintaro (talk) 02:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Status of West End Games

message: For the record as of 8-11-2008 WEG is still in business, they are simply selling the products they have and are not creating any new product.  Anyone saying they are out of business is incorrect.
Isn't West End Games out of business?
: They went into bankruptcy in 1998, but they restructured and are back in business. --Wingsandsword 06:52, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Various Talk

message: WEG was recently acquired by Stewart Wieck, thus ending the rather toxic ownership of Eric Gibson.  Could someone write up a section on this and perhaps expand information on how WEG originally collapsed under its (first) bankruptcy and lost the Star Wars RPG license? ABCoLD (talk) 01:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Owner and more details
Talk:Helen Walton

message: This article meets the requirements for Start class. I have made the change for WP:Oklahoma and WP:Biography. Bruin2 (talk) 01:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification

message: Hello! Helen Walton's name currently reads "Helen Robson Kemper Walton" in the introduction and "Helen Robson Kemper" in the infobox of this article; however, there is no record of Ms. Walton ever having the name "Kemper." I have checked the family's records and confirmed that this is not a name she has ever had. In addition, there is no online source with that name.
Are there editors who can assist with removing "Kemper" from the introduction and infobox? I will not direct edit this page because I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest; I work with the Walton family office, as I disclosed on my user page and declared above. Thanks, Kt2011 (Talk · COI:Walton family) 18:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you,  Spintendo.  Kt2011 (Talk · COI:Walton family) 21:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy in introduction and infobox
Talk:The American Crisis

message: Instead of deleting, this could probably be moved to Wikisource Danny 23:29, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Wikisource

message: The quote "These are the times..." was in the second volume according to a version that I am reading.
Did not the first volume start with "General Gage's Proclimation lies before me..."?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philfromwaterbury (talk • contribs) 04:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume I or II?
Talk:Iron Flag

message: Out of all the Wu-Tang group albums, why is this one the most written about?  Why are the beats described?  The beats on this album are some of RZA's absolute worst, the hooks are annoying as fuck, and the flows are lazy and half-assed.  Not only the worst Wu-Tang album to ever come out, but one of the worst albums I ever heard.  I have a hard time believing it's actually a Wu-Tang album at times.--Tainted Drifter 20:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're out of your mind papo. This album is a stone cold classic. Put it back on and listen to it more closely. Majik43 05:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

text: i wrote this article (i was originally going to do it for the other wu albums but got bored), and i tried to keep it neutral.  the only thing i can see that might not be is describing one of these days's beat as "generic".  i did not say the non-traditional sounding songs were bad at all; my favorite beats on this album are in the hood and rules, neither of which sound traditionally wu-tang.  i also quite like the extremely un-traditional back in the game.  no bias was intended.  --Jamieli (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm 

message: In the absences section it says that the w was the last album to feature ODB..but he was featured on 8 diagrams.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.73.129 (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last album to feature odb?? I think not! 
Talk:Fit to Serve

message: "Judgement Day" is written by Skip James. 2601:183:C700:5110:9140:C0F2:BC74:912A (talk) 21:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm...can not edit that.  On the sleeve of the CD it is credited to Skip James but A.J. Croce confirmed it is one of his on an Instagram post.  Plus, I can not find an album by Skip James that has a song called "Judgement Day" on it. 2601:183:C700:5110:9140:C0F2:BC74:912A (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction
Talk:Frampton Comes Alive!

message: Frampton states this was the first live album to record in a new way. Was he referring to Dolby "A" or 24-track ? ~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 10:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Groundbreaking Album

message: As the owner of an original vinyl copy, I agree it's good, but I am always surprised at the total reverence for this album. I've never felt it comes up to Live Rust or Live at Leeds. Sales alone aren't proof of quality. Instead of just having an allmusic score, the claim of 'one of the greatest live albums of all time' really ought to be backed up by a detailed 'critical reception' section. Stub Mandrel (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia would be better off if the phrase "one of the greatest" was eliminated from all music articles as it is a somewhat vague, loosely-defined term when you think about it. I'll add some contemporary reviews soon but looking at a few, it seems the consensus was that it was a very good live album, Frampton's best album to date, but nothing that hinted at the popularity it would achieve. Piriczki (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Why So Good?

message: Shouldn't Doobie Wah credit The Doobie Brothers, or at least Tom Johnston, as a partial author since the track is an obvious reworking of (and an outright nod to) Listen to the Music?  Or is the argument that since the album's liner notes don't credit the Doobie Brothers, Wikipedia can't either?  This is an encyclopedia after all, and facts are facts.
71.226.227.121 (talk) 13:34, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doobie Wah
Talk:Global optimum

message: Should this be merged with the Maxima and minima page?
--Olegalexandrov 23:55, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Might be a good idea, as there isn't much to put on here that isn't already on the other page. Anand 19:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I've merged it to Maxima and minima. I agree that I don't see any real scope for this topic beyond what's already covered in either Mathematical optimization or Maxima and minima. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:The Dragon in the Sea

message: I mention the dracone link because at some time in the 1960s or early 1970s I read an article in New Scientist that mentioned the inventor being inspired by Herbert's book. Even without my being able to find that reference, the choice of the name would appear to be a remarkable coincidence. --Malcolm Farmer 00:04, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added that but we need to find a reference. ··gracefool☺ 10:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dracone link 
Talk:Key management

message: Should this article link to ISAKMP maybe? I dont know!
:I added ISAKMP to Category:Key management. I think that should do it. --agr 13:07, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm 

message: It would be nice if someone could expand the article to describe something of the actual practice of key management as well as a list of the areas it encompasses.  A bit of how, as well as what! Gobbag (talk) 10:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  article needs actual practice coverage 

message: This link seems to be more commercial than is acceptable. 
* The 2008 IEEE Key Management Summit
So I removed it. Anyone have a different view? ww (talk) 03:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  semi-commercial link removed 

message: We need to clean up Key Management - add best practices, talk more about typical applications, regulation bodies and standards and remove/marginalize access control.KSinitski (talk) 21:05, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning Up Key Management 
Talk:S

message: In Related letters, the Turkish S cedilla is missing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.247.248.111 (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's mentioned at "S with diacritics". (CC) Tbhotch™ 16:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

text: @ 175.100.12.15 (talk) 11:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish S cedilla 

message: Which has an /ś-/ sound. Origin, or original inspiration for the S? -There is a Fabric Throughout all of Reality (talk) 18:47, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Latin alphabet is several centuries older than Devanagari.  The ancestral letter 𑀰 is even less like S, though one might fancifully connect it with Greek Σ. —Tamfang (talk) 23:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devanagari श 

message: There is now a seperate Wikipedia article for Ṡ/ṡ/ẛ ("S with dot" or "S with overdot"). It would be more helpful if the anchor text "Ṡ ṡ ẛ" in the section on related characters linked to that instead of the page about dot diacritics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.1.48.221 (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 13:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperlink for "S with overdot" 

message: It's misleading to place the long s in the quick section area, it's not used anymore. Imagine you are an alien and you are trying to learn the Latin alphabet, you are going to get the impression that the long s is the widely used lowercase letter. We should talk about it in a section. Restfultree2022 (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the long s should not be given equal prominence in the infobox; I have moved it to the "variations" parameter. There is already a section about the long s. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove the long S from the front Quick Fact section, it's misleading, make a section for it!! 

message: Read along the path, all the introductions except this are written in full form of ordinary number like seventeenth, eighteenth but this is written as 19th. I suggest there should be a minor change from 19th to nineteenth to ensure consistency. 2001:EE0:4BC7:1FE0:3DA6:7723:C1A5:5A75 (talk) 12:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Now fixed. Shantavira|feed me 14:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think the introduction is not consistent. 

message: * "S's are tricky"
* The most difficult symbol by far, at least for me, was the letter S (and the numeral 8, which uses the same procedure); in fact I spent three days and nights without sleep, trying to make the S look right, before I got it. At one point I even felt it would be easier to rewrite all my books without using any S's! After the first day of discouraging trials, I showed what I had to my wife, and she said, "Why don't you make it S-shaped?" page 361
Arlo James Barnes 09:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  writing S
Talk:VDARE

message: I don't think we should have the URL for a website as dangerous as this in the infobox. Even though it was included in good faith, we should not be helping people find this site. There is no encyclopaedic purpose for its inclusion Stephanie921 (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored. In general, Wikipedia articles about websites include the URL of the website so that readers understand exactly which website the article is describing. The inclusion of the URL is informational, which is in line with the core purpose of Wikipedia (providing knowledge). If someone encounters the website elsewhere and then finds the Wikipedia article afterward, the article needs to have the URL so that the person can confirm that website they found is the same one as the website described in the article. Hiding this information would do a disservice to our readers. — Newslinger talk 04:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link
Talk:Inglemoor High School

message: Much of the subject matter of this article was not notable.  Students in 2004 who applied for an IB diploma are not notable.  People do IB programs all the time. Something special about the IB program is needed to distinguish it from all other IB programs.  Also, instead of stating: "The music department at Inglemoor is also very successful", there should really just be a paragraph showing the achievements of the music department, and the success part will be implied.  That paragraph would also require citations. --DerRichter (talk) 22:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IB program 

message: We have teacher and school confirmation that he was a student, but no online documents that I've found. He was a notable alumni and instrumental in our Open Mike program. What's an appropriate citation for this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.247.39.72 (talk) 01:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you cite any sort of WP:V verifiable documentation, such as a yearbook? It doesn't have to be online (see FUTON bias), but it shouldn't be original research. tedder (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Walla
Talk:Gary Soto

message: He's written this one:  -71.133.162.217 06:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Poetry

message: The writing style of the article is too simple and seems oriented to very young readers. As he was an author, he deserves a higher quality and more adult style. Example below reads like a storybook.
:"Gary Soto was born to working-class Mexican American parents Manuel and Angie Soto. In his youth, he worked in the fields of the San Joaquin Valley and in factories in Fresno. Because his family had to struggle to find work, he had little time or encouragement for school. Hence, he was not a good student."
--Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 22:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: Some sections of the bibliography follow chronological order.  Others follow reverse chronological order.  Why?
2601:401:C500:ABF0:62F8:1DFF:FEB0:CE94 (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Entergy

message: This section seems like a shameless public-relations plug. It's out of line with articles of its categories, and completely irrelevant to the rest of the article. J1.grammar natz (talk) 04:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public service section 
Talk:Unbibium

message: *At 22:29, 3 November 2018‎ much text was added from Draft:Unbibium (which after that was moved to Unbibium (version 2)). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:42, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: History note

message: If it doesn't exist, why should we even write an article? What do we even know about iit? We could be completely wrong about this! Porygon-Z 14:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The purpose of the article is to explain various predictions on chemical and nuclear properties (there are quite some) from reliable sources. We cannot say if we are right or wrong until the element is discovered and there is empirical data. ComplexRational (talk) 01:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real? 

message: Is in this paper (where Ds, Rg, and Cn were confirmed also). Double sharp (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original source for 2000 GSI try for 122
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomical Objects

message: Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude (talk) 06:47, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 Bot Beta
Talk:List of Indian independence activists

message: This article's list should rearrange in alphabetical order. People are getting confused and adding duplicate names. Dhina35554865 (talk) 04:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: Where is Hazrat Madani rh.? - Owais Talk 18:00, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: "As the maintenance template says, this is an incomplete list", please add missing names. Thank you. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2021
Template talk:Ultima

message: I did some minor changes to this template. Pretty much italics stuff, but I also fixed a problem that happened when using that template on the Ultima article, regarding its header. Seems fine now. – Kaonashi 02:28, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor changes

message: As it is, the template kinda gets in the way of some of the page formatting -- check out Ultima Underworld and you'll see what I mean.  I suggest the tempate be moved to a bottom-centre format like that most typically used in game sries, as with :Template:SimUniverse and :Template:Civilization  --Alexwcovington (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reshaped the box to landscape. Not sure how to go about centering it.--DooMDrat 12:34, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting

message: Navboxes really shouldn't contain external links.. -- œ™ 07:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, probably so.  Can't make an article for any of the books, since someone would come along and delete it.  That's how it is these days.  I Google for the first two, but don't find any reviews for them anywhere.  Anyone think there is enough coverage of any of the books for there to be an article on the Ultima novels, combined together?  Lynn Abbey wrote two and someone else made three more I think.  Dream Focus 01:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I notice there's already mention in Ultima (series)#Novels.. should be enough. -- œ™ 11:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Ultima novels

message: Although Underworld Ascendant is a continuation of the Ultima Underworld series, it is NOT an Ultima game as they did not get the Ultima license (this is even mention on the primary article, here's the reference.) As such, I think we should put it in parentheses since this infobox is for Ultima.S-1-5-7 (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Underworld Ascendant
Talk:United States Army Reserve

message: I am a little confused: if "100% of chemical brigades, internment brigades, judge advocate units, medical groups, railway units, training & exercise divisions, and water supply battalions" belong to the reserve, then does that mean we only have these units 1 weekend a month and 2 weeks a year??? 141.152.254.26 (talk) 04:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This information is dated. But yes to your question and for as long as they are mobilized. V/R Bullock  ✉ 04:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  100% ? 