Talk:Raj Persaud

message: Does anybody know how / why allusions to the incident of alleged plagiarism, according to this page's history, have been deleted in the recent past? (preceding unsigned comment by 81.155.178.65 at 06:27, 19 November 2005)
Maybe because of the vindictiveness involved. The Guardian has been hounding Raj for a long time now —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.105 (talk • contribs) , at 21:17, 2 January 2006
This biographical sketch does not do justice to Raj Persaud's tremendous reputation, contributions and following. There seems to be an organised and persistent attempt to discredit Raj. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.105 (talk • contribs) , at 22:23, 18 December 2005
:I think we can now all agree that Raj managed to discredit Raj. 86.133.48.32 (talk) 16:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad someone else has already reverted your edits, User talk:128.86.151.46.  Private Eye has a fine history of investigative journalism, and has broken or helped to break many stories in the past, including the Profumo Affair and others.  Just because you don't like what it says doesn't make it any the less true: Persaud has a long and repeated history of plagiarism, which he has tried to blame on others (sub-editors and the like) while failing to take full responsibility for his actions. 86.152.22.234 (talk) 15:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Raj Persaud has indeed resumed presenting the BBC Radio 4 programme "All in the Mind".  I heard this evening's (Tuesday 10th April 9-9.30 p.m.), which he presented, and the trailer for next week indicates he will again be the presenter for that edition.Judy Skelton 21:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone else who can confirm this? --Tilman 04:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Bringing the website is all that was needed. Thanks. --Tilman 17:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raj Persaud 

message: Raj Persaud has recently given a public lecture (from a church pulpit, of all places!) which, as well as being very well presented, entertaining and thought-provoking, is perhaps his first public performance after the plagiarism scandal. It can be watched online here: http://www.gresham.ac.uk/event.asp?PageId=45&EventId=800 and would make for an interesting external link I would think. (I only don't put it up myself as there is a possible conflict-of-interest as I am connected with Gresham College, who hosted the lecture). Jamesfranklingresham (talk) 17:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm puzzled by this one.  I can see why it would be good for Persaud.  But I would have thought this sort of thing would only bring Gresham into disrepute. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 06:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Suggestion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Rajendra Persaud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070815210504/http://gresham.ac.uk:80/text.asp?PageId=33 to http://www.gresham.ac.uk/text.asp?PageId=33
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080502000944/http://bjp.rcpsych.org:80/cgi/content/full/181/3/258 to http://www.bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/181/3/258
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified