Talk:Naked DSL

message: We need some comments on who offers it, and why everyone doesn't.  I don't know enough about the regulations/options to do it myself :(  But if I manage to find out, I'll be back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.223.131 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 14 January 2006
:I assume most don't offer it because of the possibility to cut into their profits. Dry loop is a good way to go VoIP, and no Telco want Vonage infringing on their turf. Just my guess, of course. :) True Vox 06:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Providers? 

message: I've changed the reference to RBOC to ILEC instead. For the context in which it was used, ILEC seems more appropriate since it is immediately apparent as being the opposite of CLEC. Also, RBOC is a term that is specific to the United States, while ILEC is (at least slightly) more universal. --Miken2005 07:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ILEC versus RBOC

message: the page linked to is no longer avalible.Pikajedi3 13:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date links 

message: Information about naked DSL of quality of service would be germane. LorenzoB 21:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of service? 

message: Rather than try to update the USA section I will add that since the merger of AT&T and BellSouth back in January 2007, AT&T is offering a service called FastAccess DSL Direct not just in Texas if I have my sources right.  A trip to the AT&T website has a link down near the bottom that leads to an 800 phone number. Greenbomb101 (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA - AT&T's DSL Direct 

message: I had service from Verizon's dry loop for around $23/month.  This is to dispute the wiki article item noting that dry loop is not competitively priced and costs more than bundled services. (Despite the low price, I eventually dumped the product because of shoddy customer service.) Cdfield (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not competitively priced? 

message: I'm not entirely clear one why anyone would get Naked DSL over DSL. I think the reason is that with DSL you must also sign up for phone service, but this is not the case with Naked DSL. If someone can confirm that, can we make it more clear in the article? --Daev (talk) 17:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: Are "Industry sources who wish to remain anonymous" REALLY an appropriate thing to cite? Doesn't that violate WP:VER almost by definition?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.135.32.188 (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: Under the heading “Comparison of regular and naked DSL,” is this sentence, copied from the edit screen to preserve wiki text:
:Thus the customer will have a dial tone, which allows them to use the telephone line as a regular land line while they are using it to access the Internet on their computer.
There is the singular “customer” and plural pronouns, “them,” “they” and “their.”
Here are my rewrite proposals:
:Thus the customer will have a dial tone and can make phone calls over the regular land line and be simultaneously connected by computer to the Internet.
::OR:
:Thus the customer will have a dial tone, which allows for the use of the telephone line as a regular land line while it is in use to access the Internet with a computer.
The second rewrite more closely resembles the original wording.
These work­-arounds may take a little extra thought and effort to make it right, while avoiding the not p.c. “his” and the improper “their.”
I try to avoid the not­-politically­-correct, but grammatically correct male pronouns for generic singular use, but I refuse to use the plural counterparts with a singular subject, nor will I use the equally abominable “his/her” mishmash.
Fifth­-grade­-through­-High–school English classes (late 1960’s)
Lytzf (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singular­-plural mismatch “customer” “their” avoidance 

message: "Verizon stopped permitting Standalone DSL for its own customers in 2014".  But they haven't taken mine away yet.  (I can well believe they aren't offering it as a new service, and are grandfathering people like me.) —Steve Summit (talk) 17:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect statement about Verizon 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Naked DSL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140310134305/http://www.chorus.co.nz/file/42884/Investor-Presentation.pdf to http://www.chorus.co.nz/file/42884/Investor-Presentation.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)