lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Old Field Point Light

message: The current lead sentence "Old Field Point Light is listed as number 21275 in USCG light lists." when combined with the information that the light is located in New York State might lead to http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/LightLists/V1COMPLETE.pdf (where Old Field Point light is listed) or it might inadvertantly lead a reader to http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/LightLists/V7COMPLETE.pdf which is a Great Lakes list that includes portions of New York State (St. Lawrence, Lake Ontario, Lake Erie) and it lists 21275 as a nun buoy on Lake Michigan as:
:Lake Michigan Rowley Bay 21275 - Buoy 2 Marks west side off Barkers Reef. Red nun.
Hence I do not think that the lead sentence is as helpful as it could be in identifying this lighthouse.  Perhaps the lead sentence could instead be written to read as follows:
Old Field Point Light is a lighthouse within the village of Old Field, New York between the entrances to Port Jefferson Harbor and Stony Brook Harbor on the north shore of Long Island.
Within a few days time I will alter the lead to that unless someone objects to doing so here on this talk page.  Thanks for considering this rewrite proposal.  67.86.73.252 (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposed change to the lead sentence has been placed into the article.  67.86.73.252 (talk) 00:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number 21275 appears not unique
Talk:Third Avenue Bridge (New York City)

message: Given that this is the fourth bridge to be erected at this site, why does the opening date still reflect the date of the third bridge's opening? It should either be 1797 or 2004, depending on whether you want to state when the first crossing or the current structure was inaugurated; the date of opening of an intermediate structure is not relevant either way. Shalom S. (talk) 22:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening date
Talk:Cabinet of New Zealand

message: I suggest removing the names from the image description - every head is about 2-3 mm large even at the best thumbnail setting - how is anyone going to identify anyone (if he's not overwhelmed by the block of text first?) on that small picture? If specific names are looked for, why not click on it and get the detailed description there? I'll change that accordingly, but won't fight it if you revert my change. Cheers. Ingolfson (talk) 05:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabinet picture 

message: The table is broken on the rightmost column and the row for 17, David Clark. I am not sure how to fix it. If someone could that would be great. WBPchur 💬●✒️●💛 06:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Schwede66 10:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken table 

message: I intend to update the list ASAP. A list of ministers and portfolios has been published, but I'm struggling to find a ranking of ministers. I'm going to hide the list of Labour/Green ministers as it is outdated.--Hazhk (talk) 18:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! I appreciate your contribution. --Hazhk (talk) 21:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating table of ministers

message: Hey @DDMS123, think at least the Seymour photo should be the new one given the one you changed it to is almost a decade old and imo worse quality. TheLoyalOrder (talk) 01:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @TheLoyalOrder - I changed the David Seymour photo to the 2023 one. DDMS123 (talk) 01:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 👍 TheLoyalOrder (talk) 01:23, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:Willis Avenue Bridge

message: Any idea what this is?  Footing for the new bridge, I guessed at first, but this is the upstream side and isn't the new bridge to be entirely downstream from the old?  And the Manhattan upstream side has no such structures.   Jim.henderson (talk) 00:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footing? 
Talk:NYU Langone Hospital – Long Island

message: Can someone please fix the medical jargon toward the end of the article? Many people do not know what those abbreviations mean. Cheers, Mazeau (talk) 04:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity 

message: While the hospital's history may say they were founded in 1896 and began as Nassau Hospital, Nassau County didn't exist until 1899. Present-day Nassau County was part of Queens County, and when the western 1/3 of Queens joined NYC in 1898, that set the other 2/3 of Queens on a track to become a new county called Nassau County. 
I wonder when the hospital actually opened (for all we know it could have been founded on paper in 1896 but opened later), and I also wonder what the very first name was. 108.41.195.229 (talk) 02:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification on 1896 and "Nassau"
Talk:Michael Stone (author)

message: notability:  What has he published famous enough for him  to qualify as notable? RJFJR 02:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bugger all most likely.  The bulk of the article was written by User:Christopher J. Hall who is apparently his publisher.  I wouldn't oppose an outright delete of this and the related articles if it came up. Richard W.M. Jones 08:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WDCZ

message: WBFO is the survivor; did not make seem to make sense to state it simulcasted WNED; also the lead states that WNED simulcasted WBFO. After making the change I can see where the prior editor was coming from; the owner of WNED purchased WBFO so it is from that standpoint he saw for the short period the simulcasting occurred that WBFO was simulcasting WNED. However, the more powerful station is usually not considered to be the simulcaster.1archie99 (talk) 19:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History - June 3 edit re: simulcasting
Talk:WNED-FM

message: I receive it on my portable digital TV with a test pattern. The TV identifies it as 43-10. 43 is the RF channel that WNED-DT occupies. This should be noted in the article.1archie99 (talk) 15:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WNED-FM is also on WNED-DT 

message: Watch for the results Espngeek (talk) 21:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 Top Classical 100 

message: Again, watch for the results Espngeek (talk) 22:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 Top 20 Composers
Talk:WOTT (FM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a series of adventure gamebooks is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the game books. - Dravecky (talk) 01:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Madhouse Brigade

message: My father was the executive producer and a writer on the show. The information I posted is from memory as I worked on the show, designing various props and sketch title graphics. I did a search for "Madhouse Brigade" and found the links that I used for verification. I believe we have the only remaining copies of the 13 episodes. They are in an old video format (3/4 inch u-matic), so I plan to have them digitized and then I can watch the shows and make note of the credits and include those as well. Jenny 02:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:WXPK

message: In 1971, WRNW morphed to easy listening, then to Top 40 and in 1972, finally transitioned to a Progressive Rock format.
The word "finally" lends opinion to the above sentence as this was not the last format change for this station.  Also:
Notable alums of the Mount Kisco and Briarcliff WRNW include Peter Salant, Vince Delisi, Russ Dibello, Thom Morrera, Bob Marrone, Kent Murphy, Donald Jay Barnett, Randy West, John Barracca, John Vidaver, Tim Powell, Harris Allen, Donna Halper and Lisa Karlan.
Notable by who?  I have never heard of any of these people, are they notable, or is this a list of former station employees?
--Div60 (talk) 22:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: edited for neutrality

message: . . . "RNW" was an alliteration for "Radio In the Woods," a reference to the station's semi-rural location.
This is incorrect.  Although the station briefly and informally referred to itself as "Radio in the Woods," the letters "RNW" were not formally associated with that phrase.  Moreover, it was disliked by station owners who ordered it stopped and did not want a rural identity but were instead attempting to position the station as a suburban (not rural) alternative to New York stations.
Troismetres (talk) 00:49, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  edited for accuracy
Talk:Thirteenth Avenue (Manhattan)

message: This is a very interesting article about a virtually forgotten history of New York City. In my view it needs better sourcing, however. A single link to an anonymous blog post--itself not sourced--leaves me wondering about the accuracy of an otherwise fascinating topic.--Phil Studge (talk) 12:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Sheet 11 of Mathew Drips' map from 1867 shows a "Thirteenth Avenue", one avenue west of Eleventh Avenue. Is there any explanation for this, or was the avenue simply mislabelled on that map? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Another?
Talk:66th Street (Manhattan)

message: Yup, a whole lot bigger.  More important, it's better, too.  Couple weeks ago, had the mass AFD been selectively aimed at this article, I would have said yes, kill this sickly little runt.  
Still, no pictures.  That one's my fault.  Thursday after the rain, I unfolded the bike and went up there before Sunset to snap a bunch.  Saw no co-name street sign for Jennings, by the way.  Alas, the mostly good weather recently has had me pedalling my assets all over town taking more pictures instead of staying indoors and picking out the pix that weren't ruined by my clumsiness, so my backlog is two or three weeks.  If someone reacts quicker, mine will only be uploaded if I think they're definitely better, which is unlikely given my usual failure to understand the light of rainy days.  Oh, I hope to see some of you at the Wikipicnic a week from now.  Jim.henderson (talk) 03:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bigger 

message: Since the 1986 plan by Donald Trump for the tallest building was never realized, nor is it currently in the planning stages, should we consider it too minor to be included? --Knulclunk (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposal received ample covergae in teh media and was the conerstone of Trump's original proposal for his "Televison City" on the Hudson River. That it was (and will) never constructed there has nothing to do with inclusion. Alansohn (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A 1986 plan by Donald Trump 
Talk:Area code 917

message: Is 917 still reserved for mobiles, or has it gone back to the general pool with the other overlays? —Tamfang (talk) 02:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  still reserved? 
Talk:Batman vs Superman

message: Greetings. Hope you guys like the article. There is no reason to delete it, as I listed sources. I felt it was too long to be kept in an article under the Batman film series-failed projects section or something like that. Anyway, this article can be even better, and I'm not sure whether it has a chance of become GA status. Nonetheless, should we delete or keep the poster. I need your thoughts. Thanks. Wildroot 21:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's deleted. Wikipedia is not the place for you to create your own posters and pass it off as official. ' 15:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome 

message: Okay, Alientraveler and Erik. Hit me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildroot (talk • contribs) 04:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here we go 

message: No reason to separate all these articles out. Wikipedia is about quality, not quantity. They fit just fine on the film series page before they were moved. Secondly, Daily Scripts is not a reliable source, because we have no idea if the scripts they post are legitimate scripts. Anyone could have written them, we cannot verify their authencity, especially scripts for movies that were never released.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 04:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what IMSDB is, if it's internet movie script database, then no it isn't reliable. If David Hughes had an interview, where you have a question/answer session, then it would be a primary source and acceptable to use. Daily Scripts is not acceptable. I know of this page because I see everything....MUAHAHAHAHAA.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 11:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, quality, not quantity. There were so many failed projects it'd be better to just link to those old scripts. Alientraveller 11:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reason 

message: Redirects are meant to help users find what they're looking for. However, the redirect of "Batman vs Superman" to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice proved to be very unhelpful to me when I was trying to use that search term to find the Batman: The Dark Knight Returns film. I was hoping to at least find a disambiguation page with the term, so I could find the animated version, but I kept being brought back to this live action movie.
So, should we revisit this redirect, or simply add a link to the other page(s) for when others are redirected here when trying to NOT find this page? Because I do feel a disambiguation page would be beneficial for this search term, esp. since it also applies to comic book fights between the two. Having it solely redirect to this movie is only helpful when you're specifically looking for the movie.
Mousenight (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we keep the redirect?
Talk:Baychester, Bronx

message: The co-op city zip code is 10475.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.5.165 (talk) 13:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Beekman Place

message: With separate articles for this and for Sutton Place, Manhattan, the idea of "neighborhood" collapses and Wikipedia becomes a gazetteer of sreet names. The Beekman house on the bluff overlooking the East River was named "Mount Pleasant". Katharine Cornell lived on Beekman Place.--Wetman (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not encyclopedic
Talk:Doyers Street

message: One source (Jaffee's Ghoulish Book of Weird Records pp.42-3) says that the Bloody Angle was formed by the intersection of Mott Street and Pell Street.--Auric (talk) 17:05, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other definitions

message: It's absurd to name this "Bloody Angle," which is a flagrant violation of WP:NAME. The common name for Doyers Street is just that, Doyers Street. "Bloody Angle" derives from the Tong Wars of the 1920s and is absolutely not the name by which this street is known. Only historians and history buffs like myself are aware that it is called by that name. The article itself says that its so-called "violent history" ended in 1930. It has been peaceful for eight decades, and I'm surprised that people in Chinatown haven't complained vociferously about this ridiculous title for the article. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the move also. The Bloody Angle is far more famous by name as part of the Battle of Spotsylvania. This article is unreferenced and the name isn't well known to those outside NYC.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 21:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right. The 1290 Google News Archives hits are almost all about the Civil War battle. They are reduced to twenty when "Doyers Street" is added to the search language. ScottyBerg (talk) 21:34, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Merger complete. Berean, thanks for fixing the redirect, I overlooked that. ScottyBerg (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article

message: The attached article has conflicting information regarding the location of the club where Irving Berlin worked. Specifically, it claims the location is on a neighboring street (Pell) and not Doyers.
https://infamousnewyork.com/tag/pelham-cafe Frunobulax (talk) 16:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irving Berlin claim
Talk:Bronx Community Board 7

message: I would like to have the Infobox below added to the article to bring it in line with similar articles. HugoHelp (talk) 02:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested edit to add Infobox, etc. 

message: 04:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 22-APR-2018
Talk:Black God (manga)

message: It's up to a start now, from a stub.  Things I noticed while skimming- the last sentence of the lead has at least 3 grammar mistakes; synopsis needs references (eventually); Terminology should not be a bulleted list, and in fact, should not exist at all- weave the terms you use into the other sections when you use them; The remainder of the article looks good, though do try to get development longer.  --PresN (talk) 17:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: ===English ===
*Mania: vol. 1 vol. 2 vol. 3 vol. 8 vol. 11 DVD part 1 DVD part 2 Blue Ray #1  manga #12
*ANN:vol. 9 
*PopCultureShock:vol. 8
*About.com:vol. 1-3 vol. 1 vol. 2 vol. 3
*CBB: vol. 11
--KrebMarkt 18:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: *Mania: vol. 1 vol. 2 vol. 3 vol. 8 vol. 11 DVD part 1 DVD part 2 Blue Ray #1  manga #12
*ANN:vol. 9 
*PopCultureShock:vol. 8
*About.com:vol. 1-3 vol. 1 vol. 2 vol. 3
*CBB: vol. 11
--KrebMarkt 18:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: English 

message: *BD Gest Extremepro (talk) 12:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: French

message: I've removed the Spectrum Nexus' review because Spectrum Nexus' website is in violation of Wikipepedia's policy on external links by containing materials in violation of copyright law. --Farix (Talk) 19:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spectrum Nexus' review 

message: Due to the significant differences between the anime and manga, the article needs to clearly distinguish which events/characters belong to the anime only. For example up to volume 9 of the manga, there is no mention of this Yakumo guy, which i assume is a anime only character and should be clearly marked as such.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Question2 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguish between anime and manga 

message: The article uses both Mototsumitama and Tera Guardian interchangely. Can anyone confirm that Tera Guardian is the translation of Mototsumitama, so we can use one or the other?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Question2 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mototsumitama 

message: Sub (substitute) is not on the list. I found the definition and would add it myself but I'm not familiar with the formatting used for the entries in that (Terminology) section.
Here is where I found the definition: kurokami.wikia.com/wiki/Glossary#Sub ZFT (talk) 23:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing terminology
Talk:Cooper Square

message: Seeing as you wont follow BRD, I will. What is the point in you reverting a justified change without providing an edit summary. You are just showing your deliberate childish antagonistic behaviour. Your edit summary is ridiculous and does not assume good faith at all! Or perhaps you feel you own the article? -- MisterShiney ✉  06:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: BMK is like that with other articles as well.    In all three, he has reverted legitimate edits to the versions that he feels like looking at. Epicgenius(talk to me • see my contributions)  19:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  BMK Is at it again!!! 

message: In regards to the 3RR issue involving the spelling of "the Bowery / The Bowery," discussion has been ongoing at Talk:Bowery rather than here. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling, "Bowery"

message: The page is currently protected. I don't see why anyone needs to be blocked here so this is the easy way out. Once the or not to the is figured out at Talk:Bowery, this should be moot anyway.  --regentspark (comment) 22:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected
Talk:Dyer Avenue

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 9½ Avenue. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 06:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "9½ Avenue" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 9 1/2 Avenue. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 06:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "9 1/2 Avenue" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Little Fuzhou

message: Aren't these two places in Manhattam?  Should these just merge?  --Patebrims (talk) 04:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Little Fuzhou and Chinatown, Manhattan ought to be merged

message: Hello
is there someone that has the access to add pictures relating to this article. When I added information about East Broadway once having The Sun Sing movie theater under the Manhattan Bridge to the article, I also provided a reference link(http://www.nycago.org/Organs/NYC/html/FlorenceTheatre.html) for it as well. Also the picture is available in the site and here is the link that goes directly to the picture (http://www.nycago.org/Organs/NYC/img/SunSingTheatreExt.jpg). I also added the info with the reference link(http://www.nychinatown.org/ebway.html and here is the link that goes directly to the picture http://www.nychinatown.org/photo2/ebway3.html) about the East Broadway Mall as well and they also have the picture of the Mall as well.
Is there someone who can add these pictures to the article? 
Nyc88 (talk 6:35, 09 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi is there someone who can add additional pictures to this article?
Talk:Fulton Street (Brooklyn)

message: I have a problem with the line, "The Fulton Mall is an outdoor commercial center that primarily caters to African American clientele." It sounds like the article is politely, and in a roundabout way, trying to say that this stretch of Fulton Street is ghetto. The statement is opinion and false. Further, it paints an ethnically diverse area, full of people from different cultures, with a tired, racial brush. 
Additionally the point of view of the article is not neutral. Non-blackness is presumed. Old Fulton is not "primarily settled by aging white hipsters who have day jobs and pay too much in rent." Nor is Fulton Ferry Landing described as "primarily catering to Asian newlyweds who insist on having their unimaginative wedding photos taken in the exact same spot as every other Asian newlywed in the city."
The line should be omitted. Trst (talk) 02:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Great Jones Street

message: Please change the comma after "brother-in-law" to a period.  I was making this edit when the page was protected. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 20:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, appreciate it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested edit
Talk:Cell phone novel

message: this is a university assignment on exploring wikipedia, i do not mean to do any advertising in this article and i provided websites and references for futher information.
wongmas214Wongmas214 03:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assignment

message: Quillpill has an iPhone app, not an SMS service.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.239.246.9 (talk) 22:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction

message: I would like to start working on the phone novel page.  If anyone would like to discuss contributions, ideas, etc. post below!  This page needs citations, edits, and general information.  I will be researching phone novels and adding/editing this page.  I tried my local library and found 0 books on the subject so I may try a Borders as well as the web. Please don't hesitate to help me out! Thanks.--Kat081685 (talk) 17:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Planned changes