Talk:Adolf Hitler/Archive 13

message: How about we remove it, it's kind of unsightly? Keep the block, though.
Ksenon 16:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I don't mind it, or think it's unsightly, but that's just my opinion. If you want to do that, there really isn't any harm. Jake 17:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism template 

message: I rolled back an edit by  which I thought had a misleading edit summary, but the diff I was looking at was misleading because it covered two edits by that user, and the first gave references. Could someone check out the accuracy of the information. I'll put back their edits.-Mr Adequate 07:34, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, it's true.  IIRC, Kershaw does mention this in his book, but I'll check just to be sure. --Viriditas 10:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wolf

message: Hi wikipedians!
Finally I have added the reconstructions I made in 2004 of the two bunkers (Führerbunker & Vorbunker) and their location to wikimedia.
I am not sure if any of these maps earn a place in this article, so therefore I have not added any (they have been added to the article Führerbunker, Hitler's death and Reich Chancellory). Nevertheless, I wanted to inform you of their existence, since I believe they are of interest to some of you. Instead of repeating the information about my reconstruction here, I refer the descriptions
I have made on the actual image pages:
# Fuehrerbunker.jpg
# Vorbunker.jpg
# BunkerLocations.jpg
I hope you enjoy the maps.
Regards, Dennis Nilsson. Dna-Dennis 13:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  These maps do not contain any information about the topic of this Wikipedia article. So why do you present them here, why not on your personal homepage ? (I do know the reason, but am too polite to tell it in public.) My request: Please keep your bunkers within your sandbox, and come back whenever you have to contribute something to this Wiki article about "Hitler". Thanks. Hans Rosenthal (ROHA) (hans.rosenthal AT t-online.de -- replace AT by @ ) (17112005)
No, that reply is uncivil and mistaken. However, the maps, while interesting, if you built them yourself, are original research and therefore inappropriate for a Wikipedia article. If you ever get them published in a reliable secondary source, they might be suitable for the article Fuhrerbunker. Wyss 16:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconstruction of the bunker(s) 

message: There is confusion, probably brought on by me, elsewhere   but I suggest all relevant material to the subject of The Rise of Hitler be under the name of the certain criminal individual who benefited : Adolf Hitler or Hitler .
I suggest that the strands of the problem out-standing be noted under  Road to Power where it is that now  ,  and then subdivided /forked into the necessary strands which are at least those below. Due to length I suggest as with theology of Pope Benedict XVI that a fork exit ,called  The Rise of Hitler .
That , sections  sub-divide from these general  interlocking areas
*The German Philosphical contribution.
*The Reichswehr in Weimar Germany contribution.
*The Industrialists The Rhenish-Westphalian Magnates' contribution.
*The landed classes-Junker aristocracy- contribution.
*The evangelical Protestant Churches' contribution .
*The  Roman Catholic Church policy and its contribution .
*The International finance contribution.
Links should then exit towards later subject such as the history of the Third Reich , Appeasement , Second World War .User:Robert McClenon is good at this thinking.
It may take another while , but as presented on Holocaust that Hitler ascended to power following elections , does not cut the mustard . 
Equal treatment must also be accorded the German Widerstand and all knowledge which would  be  as to this , possibly as in the exception that proves the rule , or more ,or however it truly was .
This suggestion I post elsewhere . EffK 21:33, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Rise of Hitler:Forking from ''The Road to Power''

message: Read slowly and clearly and simply the above claims. They seem to talk more than I can say. (Kids have their place in the playground = Kindegrarten, where they can play with every grain of sand, and nothing more.) Hans Rosenthal (ROHA) (hans.rosenthal AT t-online.de -- replace AT by @ ) (19112005)
What are you talking about?  --Yooden
It appears to be a characterisation of my interference. There are many who have sensitivities relating to the clarity I seek above . From the edit tag , it seems like a threat . Odd 'n' all .EffK 10:27, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This might be a warning