lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mekhilta of Rabbi Ishmael

message: This article appears to have been dumped here, incomplete, without wikification.  Needs to be completed and wikified. Dfass 16:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Major Cleanup 

message: Sefaria has a full English translation of this text, presented in parallel to the original.
  
It's licensed CC-BY, translated by Shraga Silverstein.  
I believe that a link to this would fall under section 2 of WP:ELYES.
I have a COI (I work for Sefaria), and have discussed it on WikiProject:Judaism.
Link should probably be to the Table of Contents for Mekhilta, but could also be to the start of the original text with parallel translation.
LevEliezer (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why not.  Altamel (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon further examination of the article's history, I see that this edit was previously reverted. I disagree with the revert, and I agree with the requestor that this link is beneficial, as it provides the full text of a work readers would likely be interested in, and does not otherwise promote the organization hosting the text. Altamel (talk) 06:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request Edit - CC-BY English Text
Talk:Robert Marien

message: IBDB gives his year of birth as 1956, not 1955.  Anyone care to check sources to determine what's correct (or, at elast, what's best documented)?
https://www.ibdb.com/broadway-cast-staff/robert-marien-79469  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.231.93 (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Category talk:United States Coast Guard Aviation

message: This category has some, but not significant, overlap with Category:United States Coast Guard Airstations, but don't let that deter you from using it. This category will be used to identify and link together aircraft used by the USCG, as well as personnel (Elmer Stone, Bruce Melnick, PO Munro), and even events (USCG involvement). in that, topics that wouldn't otherwise qualify as [[Category:United States Coast Guard], or facilities, or commandants, or whatever, may be linked via the aviation connection. ~DBS Talk/Contribs 16:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WHY this category
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/ST47 2

message: User:ST47
Category talk:	1
Category:	35
Image talk:	3
Image:	17
Mainspace	3264
Portal:	10
Talk:	148
Template talk:	1
Template:	64
User talk:	3482
User:	972
Wikipedia talk:	25
Wikipedia:	786
avg edits per article	1.20
earliest	22:43, 17 April 2006
number of unique articles	7335
total	8808
ST47's editcount summary stats as of 16:54, November 23rd 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 16:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Please note that these tend not to be too useful for evaluating vandal-fighters who use bot assistance. Generated using ais523's edit counter. --ais523 17:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Random diffs from the last 1000 edits
Talk:Adriano de Paiva

message: A brief description of his research and cooperation in the area of telectroscope would be welcome. Now only available in French  .
--C. Trifle 16:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mary, Mary (novel)

message: This is by no means a summary. There's too much detail. Surely the book synopsis is adequate?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.149.194 (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot "summary" 

message: This article is a mess. I removed the "Plot overview" because it was a blatant violation of copyright — it was the summary off the book cover. I also removed the "Plot summary" because it was so extremely long, it looked like someone's book report (and the tag referring to that had been on since 2007). That didn't leave much. I tagged it as a stub; could someone who has read it please try to write an actual, encyclopaedic article? ChrisMP1 (talk) 01:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Jack Turner (writer)

message: The information for this article was compiled though Internet searches. There does appear to be some confusion in dates since his article in "Making a difference: Rhodes Scholars review how the Scholarship shaped their lives""Making a difference: Rhodes Scholars review how the Scholarship shaped their lives". (Number 58 - Summer 2000) Trinity Today. p. 11. Retrieved Nov. 23, 2006..
The article is dated October 2000, but it mentions his DPhil, which an Oxford referenceOxford University, Department of Politics and International Relations. "Full List of Successful Graduate International Relations Theses from 1971". p. 64. Retrieved Nov. 22, 2006. lists as occuring in 2004.
Additionally, there are continuing references to Jack Turner at Oxford (the volleyballOxford University Volleyball Club. "Players Information, Student Teams, Blues Alumni". Retrieved Nov. 22, 2006. reference and another article on recent relay race entry). It seems unlikely that he would still be participating in sports at Oxford after having moved to other countries.
I am wondering if there are perhaps two different Jack Turners. If that is so, then probably all references to Jack Turner at Oxford AFTER 2000 are the second Jack Turner. Though that still does not explain the DPhil discrepancy, which puts Turner back at Oxford at least in 2004.
I am sorry if this confuses anyone else, but I am a bit confused, too.
One other question I have is where are the Turners currently living? The publisher's website claims Geneva, but I cannot find any other reference to Geneva or a date. In fact, there are no dates at all that I could find for any of the places he's lived. I have  listed the places as accurately as I can infer from the various references, but it is possible that the list is incomplete or even somewhat misleading.
If anybody can provide more accurate information or verify the information I have provided is correct, I would really appreciate it. I am just a fan of What the Ancients Knew, and I wanted to know more about Jack Turner. This article is the result of that quest. I have no direct knowledge of the person at all.
Willscrlt 17:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Date Confusion
Talk:Opt-in e-mail advertising

message: No.  Definitely not. Opt-in email advertising is a fully-fledged subject in its own right, and as the years go by it will be seen to become extremely important - becauae currently no government (except that of Italy) wishes to squash unsolicited email advertising completely.  As a result a whole breed of subtleties will develop in order to enable this medium to flourish. JB
:Lets hope that "opt-in" will become a prefix that does not require to be added to Email advertising. I suggest to merge opt-in email advertising into email advertising and mention the issues of the past and present. Most of the issues, especially spam have all their own articles to reference to. opt-in email advertising should then be redirected to the email marketing article. --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 15:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:World Tour of Scotland

message: *Number plate for Range Rover #1: L154 THP (parked outside the castle)
*Number plate for Range Rover #2: L863 ORV (external shots)
Was a different one (driven by someone else?) used for pick-ups? To me it seems Connolly has a double in some of the shots from the back seat of the Range Rover, judging by the reflection in the rear-view mirror. Also, the double's hair is more bushy than Connolly's. - Dudesleeper · Talk 19:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to self 
Talk:Ginny Gordon

message: I just rewrote the entire article, since much of the former version is comparing the series to Trixie Belden. I also added a couple of references. One of them is to a fan website, but that is the only place I could find out anything about the characters. I checked children's novel reference books, but it wasn't listed in the ones I have access to. I've never read any of the Ginny Gordon books, so couldn't use them as a source. I will continue to search for printed references, and will try to improve this further. Karenthewriter (talk) 04:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I was able to obtain a PDF copy of the first novel, and used that to replace the fan website as a reference for the character section. Karenthewriter (talk) 22:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote article
Talk:Chac: Dios de la lluvia

message: I have the release title as "Chac: Dios de la lluvia" per the IMDB listing, but I see a number of variations on that. Does anyone have more detailed or definitive info? -- Infrogmation 17:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess the IMDB title should be fine. I'd personally not heard of this film (have you seen it?) I wonder also whether and how to place the article somewhere in the overall Mesoamerican category scheme, any ideas? Maybe somewhere along the way it could be useful to somehow group together notable contemporary-culture references and depictions of Mesoamerica (a discriminating selection, mind); but it would be a low-priority item.--cjllw | TALK 05:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I saw it twice back in the 1970s. I just heard it was out on dvd; a friend is going to try to get it from Netflix so I can see it again.   While the film is a work of fiction it has rare extensive depiction of modern traditional Maya, so I 'd guess it has some relevence to a category which includes that. -- Infrogmation 15:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I've set up  for entries such as this one, so if you are aware of any more, pls add them to the cat (prob no need at this stage to further refine it by culture or whatever). I would say that even so we would only need to add the WP:MESO project banner to a select few of these articles, ie those particularly notable like this one and substantially concerning the field. Which is to say, I for one do not intend to go about tagging and monitoring every minor computer-game cruft entry with some passing resemblance to Mesoamerican culture, for starters... ;-) --cjllw | TALK 02:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds like a good policy all around. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 16:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:Apache Derby

message: Is there some reason why Derby isn't mentioned on the "Embedded Databases" page? Dfmclean (talk) 18:25, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Embedded DB page 
Talk:List of professional wrestling promotions

message: Tic toc has a sharlet  flair site saying a 2.5 million dollars and a 2023 dodge truck give away .just send 375 for it to be delivered to home.
Says its WWEand flair give away. 2601:C2:1980:B50:2011:F4B4:4A0F:6714 (talk) 17:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Current Population Survey

message: Dr. Burkhauser has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Burkhauser has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Burkhauser, Richard V. & Feng, Shuaizhang & Jenkins, Stephen P. & Larrimore, Jeff, 2008. "Estimating Trends in US Income Inequality Using the Current Population Survey: The Importance of Controlling for Censoring," IZA Discussion Papers 3690, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 03:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Burkhauser's comment on this article 
Talk:José Guadalupe Posada

message: Re User:Jchild: I agree that the article needs much more context and we can even create separate articles for some of his more famous prints, but your addition was far outside our guidelines for encyclopedic writing, so I reverted and tried to move some of your information back in step by step. I hope I get to spend some time on it this weekend. This is a possible featured article candidate with enough work. Sadly I lost my collection of Posada prints in a hard drive crash, but maybe I can retrieve some of them. ~ trialsanderrors 20:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Our academic year is about to begin and I will have little time available for a while.
But I will be interested to see what you can do with the article.
Re Posada images, I would be happy to share the ones I have.Jack Child 00:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion

message: Calavera means Skull, not skeletion, skeleton is "esqueleto" /Andy
:Fixed. ~ trialsanderrors 04:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some details

message: If you check the history of the page, you can see that it has frequently been vandalized by five different users in the past ten days. 2601:601:1001:E120:955A:FDE0:9A94:5046 (talk) 05:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequently Vandalized Page 

message: I edited the part of this article that says dia de los muertos to read dia de muertos, which is the proper name of the celebration. My edit was reverted twice now, and I'd like to know why this keeps happening.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Revirvlkodlaku (talk • contribs) 03:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another reversion 

message: How is his birth date February 31st?--Stuartkau (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate 

message: The many images are cramping the text and need to be removed or at the very least, incorporated into some sensible galleries. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far too much media on this page
Talk:Piperonal

message: The described synthesis route for MDA is clearly incomplete. Not only does it not mention how piperonal itself is included, it fails to give more specific details on several elements of the reaction. I don't have the requisite knowledge to update the entry, however, so would an interested party do so?
68.217.55.33 01:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis route incomplete
Talk:One Love/People Get Ready

message: one love  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.43.79.19 (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any proof that this song is Christian other than the suggestive lyrics? Same guy here: I forgot to mention it was released on Exodus which is a Rasta album, so now Im confused.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.110.233 (talk) 03:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian?

message: Shouldn't one hyperlink the music group "Musical Youth" to the wikipedia page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.218.208.28 (talk) 19:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperlink 
Talk:Cambridge University Press

message: Hi everyone, my name is Hannah and I work at Cambridge University Press. I would like to propose some changes and improvements to the Cambridge University Press Wikipedia page to bring it up to date, but I would very much like to engage the Wikipedia community on these changes before I publish them. You can find the proposed changes in my sandbox, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cmdcam01/sandbox. I would like to publish the changes in mid-August so any and all comments very much welcomed. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmdcam01 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've worked with Hannah several times in the past and I can testify (!) that her contributions, while connected to her professional life, are neutral in tone and factually sourced and this proposal appears no different to me, so I would see no problem with the proposed changes being incorporated.  Hannah, happy to help if necessary, drop me a line if you need anything.  Cheers, The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 15:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed edits
Talk:Production design of The Lord of the Rings film series

message: Please note, because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles. For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used. In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Please note that the original author used a variant of New Zealand English, such as the word "visualisation"; changing the spelling to "visualization" would not be appropriate. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. Ifnord (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  British English vs American English
Talk:Delphi (disambiguation)

message: "Object Pascal, also known as the Delphi programming language".
I think Object Pascal and Delphi are considerated diferent things actualy..
I propose change this phrase to:
"Delphi programming language, a programming language."
And maybe create other topic to Object Pascal.
--Wellington Brito de Carvalho 17:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no separate article for the language, it redirects to Object Pascal. There it says that they are practically synonyms. Would this be accurate: Delphi (programming language), an implementation of Object Pascal, or maybe a dialect of Object Pascal ? Now there's only a link to the IDE in this disambig. I think there should also be a link to the language.--87.162.23.208 (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Object Pascal
Talk:Susie Wolff

message: It has just been announced (Posted on Wednesday 11 Apr 2012 on the Williams Web Site) that Susie Wolff has joined Williams F1 as the team's Development Driver. This involves a significant edit of this page that I do not feel confident to do.Kuitan (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Change, 2012 

message: Is she a good racing driver? or just benefiting from marrying the team boss? nepotism me thinks....
:I'm sure there are better female drivers that never get a chance to be in F1. DTM racing results might tell you something about her driving skills, however, your question has nothing to do about improving this article...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.251.39.239 (talk) 11:25, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Driver? 
Talk:Clean Air Act (1970)

message: i need to know the interest groups involved in  the formation and execution of the law, the opposition, congresional diliberations that occered, executive response and remafications.  plz help me  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.182.17.195 (talk) 21:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

message: I really need to know why the Clean Air Act of 1970 was passed by the Congress?
I know that because 
1. of the increase of car use
2. Their was more cars which caused pollution
Have i missed any?!!
Pollution was a major problem before there were as many cars on the road as there were in the 1970's. Although then laws were only really made when that pollution affected economic interests. The CAA (1970) was passed because of local government pressures to create official statues they could set, and also by interest groups like the Sierra Club and the National Parks Conservation Association. Reason it passed may be likely due to the creation of the EPA which could finely enforce the legislation through incentives and penalties, considering all acts prior to 1970 meerly called for research funding due to no federal agency having the juresdiction to enforce such legislation.MustangAficionado (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHY WAS THE CLEAN AIR ACT of  1970 PASSED???
Talk:COIN-OR SYMPHONY

message: I've added a short introductory paragraph of context.  I'll leave it to someone else to judge whether to remove the context tag. 66.30.117.127 17:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: The result was to propose a merger to COIN-OR. --B. Wolterding 14:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like this is used a fair bit in academic and some business areas.  Google turned up some workshops on COIN-OR and SYMPHONY, and there were several university sites which discuss it as well.  I think it's notable, just special-interest.  Both this page and COIN-OR need a tidying-up session, though. --tiny plastic Grey Knight ? 13:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you think these articles (COIN-OR and COIN-OR SYMPHONY) should be merged, or is there enough material for two articles? --B. Wolterding 15:01, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure.  I think maybe we could go with a merge for now, and then we can always split them up again if the SYMPHONY section gets too big. --tiny plastic Grey Knight ⊖ 12:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I took the liberty of adding merge templates to propose a merger of COIN-OR SYMPHONY and COIN-OR CLP into COIN-OR.  I linked the other two talk pages back here for centralized discussion of the proposal, since there is already some relevant talk on this page. --tiny plastic Grey Knight ⊖ 12:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert review 

message: The reult was Merge. --B. Wolterding 16:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger?
Talk:Robot (disambiguation)

message: Please keep in mind the purpose of a disambiguation page. It is not to list everything that is related to robots. See Wikipedia:Disambiguation. FreplySpang 18:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dab page

message: Could I point out there are already lots of pages with lists of robots on them, please read the robot page and extend that one rather than this one.
A real disambiguation was growing under the incorrect name of Robots.  I have moved that useful content to the top of this page.  This page still needs severe editing.--Jaibe 12:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge from [[Robots]], real disambiguation pages 

message: I'd like to know why there was a joker that said "robots are a kind of bannana"? FYI, i deleted it just know  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.148.159 (talk) 00:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is going on in here? 
Talk:List of acts of the Parliament of Singapore

message: This article is problematic, as it is not accurate to use the term 'Acts of Parliament' when referring to statutes applicable in Singapore prior to 1965. The Singapore Parliament did not exist before then. For the various bodies (and there were quite a number of different ones) that had power to legislate for Singapore prior to full independence, see 'Law of Singapore'.
Perhaps the article should be retitled along the lines of 'List of Acts and Ordinances Applicable to Singapore', which should contain links to the following separate articles:
*List of Acts Applicable to the Straits Settlements (1826–1867).
*List of Acts and Ordinances of the Straits Settlements Legislative Council (1867–1942).
*List of Ordinances of the Colony of Singapore Legislative Council (1946–1958).
*List of Ordinances of the State of Singapore Legislative Assembly (1958–1963).
*List of Acts Applicable to the State of Singapore in the Federation of Malaysia (1963–1965).
**List of Acts of the Federation of Malaysia Parliament.
**List of Acts of the Legislature of the State of Singapore.
*List of Acts of Parliament of the Singapore Parliament (1965– ).
A complete list of such acts and ordinances appears in the book 
Also, the full citations of acts and ordinances should be stated, e.g., "Application of English Law Act 1993 (No. 35 of 1993, now Cap. 7A, 1994 Rev. Ed.)".  Jacklee 01:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is problematic