lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Forever the Sickest Kids

message: I brought this page back with more information and more references and more actual fact and less fan based.Optimous (talk 13:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Undeleted

message: Eight major labels? I find that hard to believe given there are only FOUR major labels!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.186.177.208 (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Labels

message: I believe they started in Plano Texas. Their first couple big shows were held at The Plano Center.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Standback.foryourownsafety (talk • contribs) 21:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Location formed

message: I don't think they are metalcore nor Emo O___o
:Maybe they are more like Alternative Rock, Power Pop, or something like that  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.17.61.124 (talk) 23:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Tedder, I think you may have looked at the source wrong. The article says "a stage-overwhelming turn by the promising young emo band Forever the Sickest Kids". That is the only mention of the band, and metalcore is not used to describe them. And they are definitely not metalcore. The best genres to describe them would probably be "electronica, powerpop, pop punk". I'm sure it'd be easy to find sources for those. Obviously, you just can't say "This band is that" and have it on here, but as said, good sources will probably be easily found. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 03:06, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, not sure where I got the metalcore thing from. I'll remove that ref. I just hate the "unsourced genre volleyball" that occurs. tedder (talk) 05:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. And yeah, I agree with the genre thing. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 23:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: Does anyone else thing their new music video for What Do You Want From Me looks maybe a little bit like this one:
http://www.mtv.com/videos/forever-the-sickest-kids/463849/what-do-you-want-from-me.jhtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQlzDuXdy40
Proboly just stole the meaning.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leojryan (talk • contribs) 03:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  new music video 

message: As somewhat of a buff on both bands, I'm surprised to find that the Dongs! Dongs! Dongs! EP isn't listed in the official discography. I'm aware of the legal trouble between the two groups, would that have something to do with the exclusion? I really hate to see this particular wiki get so politicized.
69.123.121.221 (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration with Tattle Tales? 

message: The external link leads to porn.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.230.13 (talk) 04:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yup
Talk:Jean d'Aulon

message: Haakonsson says "He served as her squire, or bursar,". This needs clarification. The activities of a squire were oriented towards warfare, those of a bursar to domestic administration. Did he do both? What are the primary sources and what do they say? Xxanthippe (talk) 21:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification needed

message: Do we have an estimated date of birth?  RJFJR (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Photosynthetic reaction centre protein family

message: In the text of the original, was the phrase "binding sites of the phytochemically active cofactors".  I changed this to "photochemically", assuming that was the intent of the original author.  The cofactors are, in fact, photochemically active, while 'phytochemically', if intended, seems unnecessary, given that every cofactor present is a 'phytochemical', strictly speaking.  However, if this changes the intended meaning, please let me know.  Gaedheal (talk) 17:55, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Simon Schwendener

message: http://www.sammlungen.hu-berlin.de/schlagworte/3006/
--Craigboy (talk) 07:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More images 
Talk:Lemur (input device)

message: I don't agree with this article not being notable or having to prove its notability. I suggest we remove this disclaimer. Anybody disagree? Enobeno (talk) 21:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, nobody answered, I'm removing it now. Enobeno (talk) 05:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Daft Punk's prominent use of the product makes it perfectly notable in my opinion. Fishyfred (talk) 05:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The link under Jonathan Harvey points to JH the playwright. I suspect it should point to JH the classical composer. But I could be wrong, I don't know that much about either of them. Could the person who added him to the list clear this up?
84.198.246.199 (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to have been fixed a while ago. Belated thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Fixed. Thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous users 

message: lemur is now an iOS/ipad app by liine.. if anyone wants to add that in?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4NDRW (talk • contribs) 13:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  iOS
File talk:Yellowjacket (cartoon of school mascot, Calhoun High School, Calhoun, Georgia).jpg

message: I really doubt this has been released to the public domain. Oniononion (talk) 21:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also doubt the person who uploaded the iamge form the school's website is the owner and can actually release it under GDFL as he has here. Oniononion (talk) 22:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Persondata

message: I want to inform you that I am currently requesting the bot flag to remove the remaining Persondata templates from all articles. The data set is available on a new tool. All users are kindly asked to help with the migration. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Warm regards, -- T.seppelt (talk) 12:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tool for the migration of Persondata to Wikidata 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out!
Talk:Ordinance XX

message: Is there a reason this was categorized under "obsolete biological theories"?  I don't see what this has to do with biology in any way. Removed that category XinaNicole (talk) 07:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :@FreeatlastChitchat, I will point you to WP:BRD, WP:TALKDONTREVERT, and WP:EW. Stop reverting justified deletions arbitrarily.
:The sourcing is there, why are you removing sourced content? FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  As per NPOV. Use neutral 3rd party sources only please. Thanks Code16 (talk) 03:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  The source is a third party source lol. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  this source is unreliable and WP:PEACOCK.--Human3015Send WikiLove  05:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  FreeatlastChitchat 

message: Hi
How are you I need to help 91.74.225.203 (talk) 00:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My name Sam 

message: Please I'm waiting 91.74.225.203 (talk) 00:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please
Talk:Aoyama Cemetery

message: Aoyama Cemetery  is now Aoyama Park. All but 10 of the people buried there have been dis-intered and re-buried elsewhere. One of those remaining is William Clark Eastlake, presumably due to the monument to him. He was my great-great-grandfather. Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd.
DonaldEastlake3 (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 2013 comment
Talk:Magnolia × soulangeana

message: These are called tulip trees in the Southeastern U.S..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.82.147.240 (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular name 

message: Almost every single modern database listed in the Taxonbar gives Soulange-Bodin as the authority for this nothospecies. Therefore the information provided in the article has to be disputed, and Sou.-Bod. should be kept as the author. Darorcilmir (talk) 10:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Hybrid origin
Talk:House Grey Memorandum

message: This page needs some sources. TwistedWeasel (talk) 22:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Not only does this page need new sources, but the entire text is directly copy-pasted from its one source. 208.124.24.140 (talk) 20:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-Pasted
Talk:Kanako Itō

message: Kanako Itō(by danny choo).jpg is not a copyright violation, since the image is licensed under CC-BY-SA by Danny Choo(site owner of http://culturejapan.jp), which is acceptable license in wikipedia. see http://www.flickr.com/photos/dannychoo/6399955943/in/set-72157628146391675  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puramyun31 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kanako Itō(by danny choo).jpg
Talk:Champagne in popular culture

message: Some of the content in the History section came from the Champagne (wine) article. AgneCheese/Wine 04:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution note

message: Article refers to 'incorrectly use [of] the name "champagne"'. By what authority is this usage "incorrect"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.18.26 (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name usage

message: I really like the format and flow of this article right now. I echo that comment from the AfD that this is truly how an "in pop culture" article should look like. Great job to all who've helped so far. AgneCheese/Wine 01:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Talk:Norway Corporation

message: The California Secretary of State lists Norway Corporation as an active business entity formed 13 February 1959.  .  This contradicts the information in the article.  Further, there is no indication in the Secretary's records that Norway was "temporarily renamed MBR (for Majel Barrett Roddenberry) Productions...."  Rather, MBR Productions is an active California corporation established in 1993. .  Both corporations have the same registered agent at the same mailing address, but I am troubled at the apparent assumptions made in the article that are contradicted by these records. --GNDN (talk) 22:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norway Corporation Formed in 1959, Not 1963 

message: The article has since been deleted and said wiki has renamed to AVID. LMgamer36 (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove CLG Wiki link on references
Talk:Johan Sebastiaan Ploem

message: This article is being edited by a user claiming to be JS Ploem. I have removed some copyrighted material from this article. Input from other Wikipedians would greatly improve the quality of this article. --Iamozy (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Clear COI
Talk:Al Akbariyya

message: Because nothing about this society is known, except that it is mentioned in one letter, I think it would be better to delete this article. It will never contain anything informative. / Fred-J 22:34, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: The usage of "Al Akbariyya" is under discussion, see Al Akbariyya (Sufi school) -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 05:25, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Al Akbariyya"
Talk:Royal Naval Patrol Service

message: When I first read this article the attribution (in the History section) of the foundation of the RNPS to Beresford looked questionable, despite its citation to an official history published in World War II. The Commander-in-Chief Home Fleet (in same period renamed Grand Fleet) during World War I was in fact Sir John Jellicoe, with Beresford having retired from the Navy in 1911. To harmonise with information I found much later in the article (section Boats of the NRPS), I have altered reference to him to emphasise he was a pre-war Home Fleet Commander, having recommended Grimsby in 1907.Cloptonson (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: History - role of Lord Charles Beresford
Talk:Ombre

message: I deleted the statement that "8s, 9s and 10s are removed".  An ombre pack does not have any 8s, 9s, or 10s (or Jokers or Tarocks or Kamchatkas), so removing such irrelevant items is nothing to do with the game. Maproom (talk) 12:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 8s, 9s and 10s

message: Ombre is more widely known as a decorating technique using graduations of shadow. It is done in monochrome and sometimes in color.
I'm not sure if I did it the right way, but added a link at the top to a Ombre(design) page. For the card playing enthusiasts please note the Ombre is a very common design term meaning a gradient in colors or shades, it is used extensively in fashion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.169.177.150 (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ombre

message: I thought I had read that the transition from the Spanish word hombre, to Ombre as the name of the game, had something to do with a confusion with the Italian word for "shadows".  Does anyone have any sourceable information in either direction on that?  --Trovatore (talk) 02:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Never heard that. Nothing found ! Krenakarore TK 11:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks for checking. --Trovatore (talk) 20:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian? 

message: Gibbs, Henry Hucks (1878). The Game of Ombre
 https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=gbXumUb58I0C&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
s. 14 (Continued footnote): 
"The same contributor, misled by the French, imagined the Ombre to be a Shadow."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.157.182.203 (talk) 17:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shadow 

message: It says in the article the chance is 'difficult'. I find this ambiguous. Does it mean there is low chance? As in it is a difficult & skilled game, or does it mean it's difficult to be lucky? I presume the first but I don't know the game well. This is the first I've seen of 'difficult' being used to describe the chance of a game; most talk about a 'none'-'low'-'medium'-'high'-'completely' kind of scale. EwAbIaN (talk) 12:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Chance' section of the summary
Talk:Ochirbatyn Dashbalbar

message: only false!don't play game who died for Mongolia! these are articles of people who repressed him and assassinated him!He was lonely hero against all who wanted him to kill! You couldn't rewrite history newly!Everybody knows and remember the time when killed him!
above moved from article to here as appears to be a comment on the article. Avalon (talk) 03:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: False

message: This article will be too one-sided and POV if it fails to mention his xenophobic, chauvinist, neo-nazi activities. He contributed to retarding some of the vitally important reforms such as land privatisation. Gantuya eng (talk) 15:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The reverse side of his political activity 

message: Unfortunately this article discusses him a lot as a politician and almost not as a poet. Discussion of his contribution to literature should be of great interest. As a poet he was a genius. Gantuya eng (talk) 16:07, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much politics and too little literature
Talk:The Ultimate Crime Fighter

message: The character section needs to be refined. You're making it sound like advertising and giving away so may plot details that they should be in a Plot summary instead. Also wikifying would help and adding Gigi Lai's character as she is one of the main in this series as well.--Shaggy9872004 (talk) 23:10, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Character section
Talk:Ben Nelson (businessman)

message: This article has an overly promotional tone. The article equates the Minerva Project to an Ivy League education, and also refers to the subject's former business venture as "first-tier". I believe this article does not meet the NPOV Wikipedia principle and was possibly created as promotional material for the subject. Saimouer (talk) 16:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional in nature
Talk:Bristol Siddeley Orpheus

message: This article makes it sound like the central spindle concept was invented for the Orpheus. It was not. The same design was used on a number of engines that pre-date the Orpheous, including the Metrovick F.2. The concept is generally only applicable to axial flow designs because of the "folding" and placement of the flame cans on a centrifugal flow design, so it appears on many designs as the UK moved to axial flow designs on-mass. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference is that the Orpheus was (AFAIK) the first engine to place the compressor and turbine between two bearings. In the F2, the compressor was indeed on a long large-diameter shaft supported by only two bearings, but the turbine was overhung, beyond the rear bearing. Amongst other issues, the F2 bearings were each quite complicated bits of kit, much more so than the Orpheus. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certainly not the first
Talk:De Havilland Spectre

message: De Havilland Spectre →  – de Havilland is the correct capitalisation for all de Havilland articles. Petebutt (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Note that this involves , not a page move. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:General Electric J47

message: Did any of the J47's use afterburners? AVKent882 (talk) 01:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question, according to our XF-91 Thunderceptor article the -7 variant did have afterburner. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 07:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Afterburners?
Talk:Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100

message: I note that the introduction states that the "PW100 engine family is a series of 2,000 to 5,000 horsepower (1,500 to 3,700 kW) turboprops" but the list of engines that follow range from 1892 to 3058 eshp (1411 to 2281 kW). Would it be more accurate if the range was 2000 to 3000 hp (1400 to 2300 kW)?
Also, I note that PW150 redirects here, but the PW150 engine is not listed. Chalky (talk) 02:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article on the Bombardier Q400 states that the PW150 engine is capable of 5,000 horsepower at takeoff. 86.3.108.41 (talk) 02:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does the "(2)" mean in the Specifications section? Kendall-K1 (talk) 02:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It was an incorrect citation style added here, the next edit was to add (2) after the ATR manual. Ideally we need just one source cited at the top of the section (the |ref parameter) then remove these surplus '2s' as they are confusing. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 20:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  (2) 

message: I presume these terms denote high pressure and low pressure respectively but the article should have some explanation or links to articles that do. Hooperbloob (talk) 16:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  HP vs LP 

message: There is nothing in the cited source to suggest that this new engine is a replacement for the PW100. In fact the source suggests this is an additional class of engines, and at 4,500-7,000 shp it serves a different market from the PW100. So I'm going to move this section over to Pratt & Whitney Canada unless someone can find a source that says this new engine is somehow related to the subject of this article. Kendall-K1 (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: create a new article--Marc Lacoste (talk) 22:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next Generation Regional Turboprop 

message: What do we do with references that don't work eg 1 and 3?Pieter1963 (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dud references

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pratt & Whitney Canada PW127Н. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pratt & Whitney Canada PW127Н" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The applications table has rows with color-coded shading but the shading is not explained by any sort of key. A key to the color coding should be added. 71.235.29.90 (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications table
Talk:Pratt & Whitney J52

message: I've started researching and adding information on the variants of this engine, where they were used, their specs, etc. If anyone has information about the variants that I have haven't added, please do so! SidewinderX (talk) 13:22, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Variants

message: There seems to be some confusion on whether this was ever built and flown. From my sources, and the EA-6B article here, it seems like the P-409 was built and flown in the the EA-6B ADVCAP prototypes. That said, I'm not 100% positive about that, so if someone has definitive infromation on that, let me know. SidewinderX (talk) 13:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No confusion - I  knew it had never been produced, which the previous text implied, so I made a guess, and added the fact tags. You've found the sources that clarify this, and added them. End of issue. - BilCat (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, let me try and be clear... I'm not 100% sure it was installed and run. I know that it was supposed to be used in the EA-6B ADVCAP, and from that article here on wikipedia I know (or I trust the author) that there were three experimental aircraft built, and at least one of them was in the final ADVCAP configureation. I'm reading into that that included the P-409 engine, but I don't know for sure. However I do know, from a source I really can't cite (unreleased), that the P-409 was fitted to an aircraft to check clearances. I'll keep looking around to see if I can get my confidence to 100%. - SidewinderX (talk) 17:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: P-409 Model

message: 3,000 Skyhawks, 700 Intruders and 150 Prowlers (1,700 engines) and 600 Hound Dogs need more than 4,500 engines. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Belated, but early-model Skyhawks (A-4A/B/C) used Wright J65 (license-built Sapphire) engine. There were over 1,100 of those models built. That gets the numbers close to 4,500. - BilCat (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production numbers 
Talk:Rolls-Royce Goshawk

message: What was the configuration & other technical details of this engine?
e.g V 12, XX litre, supercharged, valve type, cam position, etc?
GilesW (talk) 08:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered now hopefully! Cheers Nimbus (talk) 16:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Configuration?