Talk:Bologna massacre

message: The introduction to the article includes this phrase: "political climate in which the massacre occurred". What exactly was the political climate being referred to? Does the "strategy of tension" refer to the right-wing administration's tactic of blaming Palestinian groups in order to create sympathy for Italian authoritarianism? macscam (talk) 20:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "political climate in which the massacre occurred" 

message: I don't think that this article can be related to cold war. Ok, the years of this terrorist attack are in cold war, but black terrorism isn't an cold war related content. P.s. the importance of this article is more than "Mid": there are celebrations and memories of this day.--87.14.248.117 (talk) 18:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. "Years of lead" and the s.c. "Strategy of tension" are products of cold war in the Italian context, involving confrontation between the 2 blocks and often with connection to them (secret services, P2, Gladio, NATO, etc.)--84.220.98.178 (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Cold War]]?

message: Not a word about who received the initial blame and who the media blamed at the time?Nunamiut (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of contemporary reactions and blame? 

message: "a deep crack in the main wall has been left as is". This is incorrect.
The crack was purposely created, to commemorate the victims, when rebuilding the hall.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.210.94.136 (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The crack in the wall is not left as is but created on purpose 

message: This fad of calling things "improvised explosive devices" is just ridiculous. It's a bomb. They've been called bombs for centuries, why the sudden desire to make up this long-winded jargon when the previous word was completely satisfactory? I suggest removing this unnecessary term from the article; using terms such as this give the article a sense of being overwhelmed in beurocracy.Owen214 (talk) 14:08, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvised explosive devices 

message: There is a sentence that looks out of place: Around this massacre, as had happened with the massacre of Piazza Fontana in 1969, we developed a heap of statements, counter-statements, true and false tracks, typical of other tragic events of the so-called strategy of tension. Is this meant to be a quote from Francesco Cottiga, who is mentioned in the previous sentence? Autarch (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd sentence in Disinformation and false leads section 

message: Lots of good info, but it still needs some attention.
Nicransby (talk) 14:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficult to Read 

message: If someone has access through the Guardian paywall, there would appear to be information relevant to this article.
Bomb used at Bologna 'came from Nato unit'
The Guardian (1959-2003) - London (UK)
Author: 	Vulliamy, Ed
Date: 	Jan 16, 1991
Start Page: 	11
Pages: 	1
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/guardian/advancedsearch.html 124.171.199.35 (talk) 10:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guardian article: Bomb used at Bologna 'came from Nato unit' 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bologna massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090807121524/http://www.capperi.net:80/stragebo.html to http://www.capperi.net/stragebo.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110512065926/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017478856&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter to http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017478856&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070407135413/http://www.concorso2agosto.it:80/lingue/index_eng.htm to http://www.concorso2agosto.it/lingue/index_eng.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206023136/http://www.loradellaverita.org:80/ to http://www.loradellaverita.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bologna massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927195642/http://www.telam.com.ar/vernota.php?tipo=N&idPub=48460&id=123482&dis=1&sec=1 to http://www.telam.com.ar/vernota.php?tipo=N&idPub=48460&id=123482&dis=1&sec=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In keeping with Wikipedia's neutrality intent, the following sentence should be modified: "The attack was carried out by the neo-fascist terrorist organization Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari (Armed Revolutionary Groups), which always denied any involvement; other theories have been proposed..."  This sentence claims, without attribution or citation, that the attack was carried out by Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari, and then goes on to proclaim, "other theories have been proposed...."  This suggests that we don't actually know who carried out the attack and that the NAR is simply one of several theories about who's responsible.  Without citations, I'm not even sure how to fix the sentence.  Why has the NAR been singled out?  Was it the target of initial accusations?  Has any evidence been found against them?  Without those citations, the sentence is intrinsically biased. 73.131.216.52 (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The article now begins more neutrally: 'Several members of the neo-fascist terrorist organization Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari (Armed Revolutionary Nuclei) were sentenced for the bombing,[1] although the group denied involvement.' NAR seem to have been officially considered the perpetrators of the bombing, but as the article records, disagreement and speculation over the responsibility for it continues to this day. Robofish (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the perpetrators known or not?