lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ruth Henig, Baroness Henig

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 12:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories or information to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by reliably sourced article content, 2) the individual identifies as such, and 3) it is a defining characteristic of the individual . Please see WP:BLPCAT, WP:EGRS, and WP:CATDEF for additional information.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots  21:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category requirements
Talk:Fire-resistance rating

message: An unregistered user made reference to a new tunnel fire time/temperature curve used by TNO. He or she also stated that TNO and Effectis are now the same thing. It would be helpful to see some evidence of both of those two assertions. If the unidentified user can provide an excel file with the temperature data, I can then incorporate this into the graph that is shown on this site. It would be best to have all curves on one. It's easy enough to do in excel, but I need the data. --Achim 01:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fire-resistance rating

message: I'm not schooled in details of the process pictures 1-7 are illustrating, but surely each step has an actual name? While it provides handy little subsection edit links, using "Picture N" as a header line doesn't add much useful information to either the TOC or the subsections they identify. I'd suggest either finding the actual in-use names of the stages, or changing the header lines to use bold instead of ====Picture N==== --Short Circuit (talk) 15:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed,  I think bold more than works for it until a name is given for each if that can be done. However does anyone know how to handle the formatting so the pictures still match up. Persoanlly i think it is unnecsssary to show this many photos even. Ottawa4ever (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I plan on editing this article in regards to (1) the "how to" nature of the information conveyed in the pictures, (2) the excessive wording of the captions should be incorporated into the article's text, and (3) the extraneous pictures which do not contribute materially to the understanding of the article's content (e.g., the point of the last picture?). Comments? Kilmer-san (talk) 04:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

text: I support going ahead with that, the whole section just doesnt flow for what a wiki article is suppose to be. Ottawa4ever (talk) 07:37, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 1...Picture 2...Picture N
Talk:United States House Committee on House Administration

message: Is it correct that the House Committee on Printing was merged into the Committee on House Administration by the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 as stated in this article? 
In Joint Committee on Printing it is said that the jurisdiction of the separate committees of house and senate was moved into the joint committee, which makes somewhat more sense to me.
Forgive me my transatlantic ignorance ;-) --K.warterbeck (talk) 17:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Medici giraffe

message: This article reads very well, a few more sources would make it more complete :) Mallerd (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

message: this article claims a cameleopard is a concatenation of the words camel and leopard - but I've read it's actually camel and "pard" which is related to the latin root for "spotty". spotty camel, as it were. dunno.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.21.30.210 (talk) 01:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  cameleopard
Talk:United States House Committee on Agriculture

message: The bottom 5 Democratic members should probably be noted as temporary members. Do any other committees have a template for doing this? Sjostrom 04:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporary Members

message: This page: http://agriculture.house.gov/about/membership had deleted Dennis Cardoza, California from its member list, so I'm doing so at the wiki article.  No doubt, this is a result of the 2012 election.</br>
LP-mn (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting [[Dennis Cardoza]], California
Talk:United States House Committee on Appropriations

message: The Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS) is due to be shut down on 15 March. This shutdown will open one more door to those wishing to bring narcotics into our country or otherwise violate our Southern Border by removing a vital sensor system that is used by the Coast Guard, CBP, and other agencies. Direct the US Air Force and/or the Department of Homeland Security to continue operating this system in Puerto Rico, Florida, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. If we truly are concerned with the War on Drugs and wish to have a cost effective sensor to fight that war, then this sensor must remain active.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.213.241.59 (talk) 10:36, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  TARS aerostat border security to be shut down on March 15th 2013 

message: Are these edits CORRECTIONS or UPDATES? If corrections, then that's fine.  But if it's updates, then please keep the old names and note the changes, for the sake of this historical record. —GoldRingChip 13:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates? 

message: a) "Democrat" is not an appropriate use of the party's name. If it's going to be included, the only acceptable use is "Democratic". b) As the Appropriations Committee is an official function of the Congress, I don't think party names should be included at all. Shading is more than adequate to identify parties to anyone looking. Nevermore27 14:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Using party names in column headings
Talk:United States House Committee on Armed Services

message: They self refer to themselves as "Armed Services Republicans" all over their website. It's what they have as the website name for all the pages on their website. Should this name that they are called be included in the artricle?
* Armed Services Republicans |
* About | Armed Services Republicans
* ROGERS OPENING STATEMENT AT HEARING ON PRESSING THREAT OF CCP TO U.S. NATIONAL DEFENSE | Armed Services Republicans
BhamBoi (talk) 06:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Figured it out: on their home page, they have a tab at the top ("MINORITY") which leads to House Armed Services Committee - Democrats. There is a separate website for each party in this committee. BhamBoi (talk) 06:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armed Services Republicans
Talk:United States House Committee on Financial Services

message: It would be nice if the history listed the date the name change occurred to its current name. JettaMann (talk) 15:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Question. The House Financial Services has split one of its subcommittees into separate committees. How would we handled the old one? In the past we created redirect from the old to new, moving the page as appropriate so the history remains intact. However, in this case they're being split. Do I move and redirect one and create a new page for the other? What do you think?
See: United States House Committee on Financial Services#Subcommittees. Press release from the Ranking Member on the new changes and new subcommittee structure is in the article.DCmacnut<> 21:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split in the 111th Congress 

message: should we put the ranking members to be written and be recognised? User:Lovin'Politics (talk)
:Only with reliable sources. Sundayclose (talk) 20:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ranking member
Talk:United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs

message: Also, Ed Royce (R-CA) is chair of the committee, not Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.231.249.138 (talk) 14:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section in the article is kind of a joke.  Are we saying that in 198 years of this congressional committee's activity, there has only been one notable hearing (about North Korea)?  We should make a decision whether beefing up this section is an achievable task, or whether to simply delete it. - 332dash (talk) 20:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like nobody is noticing this, or are not concerned enough to respond. - 332dash (talk) 04:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable hearings and activity
Talk:United States House Committee on Natural Resources

message: Sen. Ed Markey has been sworn in to the Senate, but the House Democratic Caucus has not yet selected his replacement. At most, Rep. DeFazio is acting ranking member until a formal replacement is named. Owen Ruagh McCarthy (talk) 20:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking Member title for Rep. DeFazio is incorrect as of July 16 

message: I have noticed that the committee members are still for the 114th Congress.  We should change that to reflect the current members.  I am brand new to editing so I will be researching how to go about this for a little while.  If anyone would like to just go ahead and do it, feel free.
The Republican members are still not announced via an official house resolution so I will hold off until the entire committee has been appointed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.95.165.222 (talk) 19:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Members 

message: Should the Chair chart be in reverse chronological order, since more recent chair-people would be more relevant to more readers?
Alex the Nerd (talk) 23:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chair Chart
Talk:Goudy Old Style

message: The added references are a good thing, but I'm unclear on the rationale for moving the page. When I created it, I carefully considered whether it should be Goudy or Goudy Old Style. Since the original version of the type family and most subsequent versions, including those currently available, are collectively called "Goudy", calling the page Goudy seemed to make more sense. I also take issue with the new infobox and sample, which don't follow the convention of other text typefaces in Wikipedia and are, respectively, less complete and less useful. I would appreciate any thoughts from other editors on these matters. My inclination is to revert, but I won't be hasty. Rivertorch 01:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The move and the revisions 

message: hello, i removed a link
* Samples of Goudy in various weights, plus design information
<-- it doesn't work -- 78.55.7.175 (talk) 19:29, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out. I've substituted a link to a different Linotype page. (Btw, you can tag dead links by adding  instead of removing them, if you like.) Rivertorch (talk) 20:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  link deleted 

message: I’ve seen claims that digitisations of Goudy Old Style are thinner than it looked originally. (The metal type would have been cast thinner than it looked on the page due to ink spreading out on the paper, and additionally different point sizes might have been slightly different to make small sizes a bit more chunky-so a digitisation based on size 20, say, or just looking at the metal type, would be thinner than text should look.)
It’s certainly a slender design, but does anyone have a reliable source for this claim? I’ve examined specimen sheets and digital does seem slightly lighter than them but the difference is slight. I've tried two digitisations, Microsoft/URW’s and Schwartz's Sorts Mill Goudy and they’re similar-but Schwartz’s may be based on Microsoft’s rather than on period samples. Blythwood (talk) 08:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Digitisations
Talk:United States House Committee on Veterans' Affairs

message: This information is incorrect, if you go to www.senate.gov and then go to the appropriate committee you can see all of this info is wrong. I dont know how to edit otherwise I would. 
Thanks
Jake, 19 November 2007207.255.186.143 (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chair and Ranking Member
Talk:DHL Hometown Heroes

message: I added all of the missing players who were voted as the heroes. Also arranged the list alphabetically by team. I missed the Indians Hometown Hero. The choises were Earl Averill, Larry Doby, Bob Feller, Nap Lajoie, or Tris Speaker. I think it was Feller but I'm not sure.  IceDrake523 01:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Indians Hero

message: What was the purpose of noting the players who were part of the All-Century Team? It was not a similar event as this. I removed it until a suitable explanation can be provided.
The same goes for the Hall of Fame. Why is this necessary? The information on the players' Hall of Fame status can be provided in their individual article. Again, I removed it until an explanation is provided.
IceDrake523 05:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  All-Century Team and HOF 

message: "On September 27, 2006, Major League Baseball announced a list of players, one from each team, voted by MLB fans" - A list of players who what???? This page has to explain what the list of the players is. Is this the best player from each franchise? I'd be happy to write it, but I have absolutely no idea what this list is, and the entry does nothing to explain it.  This page should either be re-designated "List of players who were DHL Hometown Heroes" (or something similar) or some explanation of what the list is should be added or, if neither of these can be done for some reason, the entry should be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunshipballoons (talk • contribs) 17:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this???
Talk:Xiph QuickTime Components

message: ==Untitled==
Why is this used for videos on wikipedia? It seems obscure. Why not go with something most viewers are likely to have? I mean, I know you guys hate anything even related to Windows, or god forbid closed source... But maybe you should be realistic about your viewers. I'm not going to go download this crap, neither are most others, I wager.
I'm sure there's a better discussion place for this than this discussion page, but I'm not sure where.
--Bane1998 (talk) 01:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this used?

message: Why is this used for videos on wikipedia? It seems obscure. Why not go with something most viewers are likely to have? I mean, I know you guys hate anything even related to Windows, or god forbid closed source... But maybe you should be realistic about your viewers. I'm not going to go download this crap, neither are most others, I wager.
I'm sure there's a better discussion place for this than this discussion page, but I'm not sure where.
--Bane1998 (talk) 01:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm currently organizing comprehensive testing of the media support in LibreOffice, and from what I can gather, the latest (2009) version from Xiph isn't going to work on modern builds of OS X (10.9+), especially with the migration to AVFoundation. I don't know if anyone is working on a replacement for the Xiph QT Components, but losing them is going to affect a large number of users of tools such as LibreOffice and content from organizations such as Wikimedia. If there is an alternative, it would be great to have an update to the article to help users find it! -- Womble (talk) 03:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer works with modern QT?
Talk:Ohio State Route 124

message: Prose should replace the bulleted lists. —Scott5114↗ 16:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comments
Talk:Take point

message: This article, under its former name of Walk point was proposed for deletion on 24 Oct. 2006.  After discussion and a rewrite of the article, the AfD was withdrawn.  Bejnar 22:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD survived

message: ...and therefore render less significant the popular culture para I just added. If someone else feels strongly about it, delete the para for now, and I'll put it back in when it's more proportionally appropriate. IMHO, sometimes well-sourced folk references are necessary so that Wikipedia helps a reader better understand the language. BusterD 23:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think how you're handling it makes sense.  Like it or not, the reference as it is probably isn't well understood outside of the cultural aspect, but a decent expansion (which I'll be glad to help on when I can find some info) will give the section a more desirable weight. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someday very soon I'm planning to expand this article significantly... 

message: Should this article be merged with the 'point man' article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.16.223.109 (talk) 12:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Seeing as how the two pages refer to an action and the person taking such action, I propose to merge Take point and Point man. after all, there's no page for a car driver, but there is a page for driving. I am unsure as to which page will become a redirect or whether both pages need to be moved to a totally new name, but I am certain they should be merged.Yuravian (talk) 20:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. — Swpbτ • c 13:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: - does this have any direct connection to the subject of the article, or should it be split out into a separate one? --McGeddon (talk) 11:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  On point
Talk:Sanmao (writer)

message: Unfortunately a fair amount of this article is plagiarized from here:
http://www.mychinesestudy.com/blog/2012/the-chinese-wandering-writersan-maoecho.html
A rewrite would be advisable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.224.83 (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Old Fort Pierce Park

message: Fort Pierce Florida is NOT on the west coast of the state, please check your maps.  Yes it is on the Indian River, which is also on the East Coast of Florida.  Try near Vero Beach and Stuart Florida.  Your map location is entirely wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.221.116.146 (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ≥~C Pearson ..........Fort Pierce FLorida is on the EAST coast, between Vero Beach and Stuart or if you prefer between Melbourne and West Palm Beach.  Your map location is wrong  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.221.116.146 (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  map location is wrong
Talk:SES World Skies

message: Can someone create a page for SES-2?  It launched on 21 September 2011, and is starting to enter service in October 2011.  I don't have page creation rights.  Googling should give you the basics to bootstrap the page:
http://www.google.com/search?q=ses-2+satellite&hl=en&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=qdr:w&sa=X
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.166.167.129 (talk) 19:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: SES-2

message: I think this should be renamed SES New Skies (cf. DirecTV, for which the capitalization was in dispute).  There is guidance on this at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks). —Fleminra 01:55, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Apoc2400 (talk) 10:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: At least since beginning of 2012, SES has engaged the whole company in the One SES program: all the subsidiaries are (will?) be regrouped into SES without distinction. Shouldn't the SES World Skies article then be merged with the SES S.A. article? 212.66.74.140 (talk) 11:34, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Both this article and the SES article need to be updated to reflect the merger, however this is a valid historical article and should be kept around to provide information on the former part of the organisation. --W. D. Graham 11:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebranding as "SES"
Talk:John C. Maxwell

message: The term 'internationally recognized leadership expert' lacks credibility since if you Google the phrase the ONLY results returned relate to Maxwell. There is no way to test this claim so I believe it should not be made and propose to remove it but would like to take opinion of other editors first. Natural Homes (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2013 (GMT)
: I'm of the opinion that ALL of those peacock terms should be re-worded.  If Maxwell is notable for being an author of XX books that have made the NYT best sellers list several times, and have been distributed globally, I can dig that.  "Internationally recognized" can definitely be described in a less fluffy way.  Maxwell, for example, could be described as "an author who heralds himself an expert in leadership and management, and whose books have made a number of best sellers lists, and have achieved notable success in X, Y, and Z countries" (with references).  And while I'm aware that some schools offer PhD programs in "leadership", it's not clear what makes Maxwell an expert in this field apart from self-proclamation and his prolific release of books on the subject.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  internationally recognized leadership expert 

message: With regard to this edit by single purpose account Ryanpetetit which I reverted for being improperly sourced, and which was partially re-introduced in this edit by Paulmcdonald, aren't we still in the same boat we were in months ago, which is that most of the claims of notability, and success, and audience, etc., are coming directly from sources connected with the subject, via press releases and the guy's own website bio, etc? I still don't understand why this is being perpetuated, and why other, independent sources aren't being provided if the guy is so widely notable. Even if you phrase it such that Maxwell "claims" to have written 71 books, we can't base the bulk of an article on what Maxwell claims. What am I missing, and why shouldn't this new data be removed? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:42, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  72 Books 
Talk:List of The Invisibles characters

message: I am removing it from  that category since i considered that  the article and not the list should be included there. please see the  talk page for more information and a follow up. --Cacuija (my talk) 02:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from [[:Category:Fictional anarchists]] 
Talk:Optical fiber/Draft introduction

message: This is a proposed introduction section to make the article more accessible to non-technical readers. This should make clear what the article is about without using excessive technical jargon. The article should be rearranged to move up the sections that will be interesting and understandable to the greatest number of readers, while the technical details should be moved down in the article. This hopefully makes the article valuable to all Wikipedia readers, but still keeps all of the technical content needed to make the article complete.
To be determined: Should this be a seperate section, or an expanded lead section?
The Photon 02:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Spencer Silver

message: I removed the assertion "Spencer used the patented formula from Shiro Takemoto" from the article as I can find no evidence to support it. It was added to the article in 2011 by an anonymous contributor (IP user, no other edits before or since). No citation was supplied. Searching Google Patents for Takamoto's inventions yields only patents filed by Takemoto between 1977 and 1989, clearly later than 3M's product. The nearest is "Method of making matrix free thin labels" which he submitted while working at Avery. It specifies no specific, new adhesive formulation, but a range of possible adhesives either unpatented or patented by others. Guffydrawers (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Takemoto