Talk:Company union

message: In the U.S., at least, company unions are an important issue.  Although federal law outlaws company unions, the issue has arisen recently in light of a number of developments: An AFL-CIO push for labor-management cooperation; a push by legal expert Charles Morris and a number of unions for member-only minority unions; and the role employers play in card-check union recognition under American law.  The National Labor Relations Board has recently suggested (in the Kentucky River cases) that employer cooperation with unions in signing neutrality and/or card-check agreements illegally taints the union and turns it into a company union. I think the issue is much more important than "Mid". - Tim1965 22:57, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm woefully aware that my attempt to give this article an international scope is sadly lacking. It's the best I could do in my spare time without hitting the library. Still, I think it's a decent opening salvo. — Scartol · Talk 08:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay, it's a real article now 

message: Professor Jonathan Rees has just sent a new book to the publisher on this subject, with a considerable amount of new material. I have read the first few chapters, and i think this will be a significant contribution to the topic of company unions. Jonathan's web page is here:
http://faculty.colostate-pueblo.edu/jonathan.rees/
I don't know the release date.
Richard Myers 09:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree completely with the observation that this is an inappropriate destination for the Business unionism redirect. However, the problem is not with this file, it is with that redirect file. I have temporarily assigned the link to Labor aristocracy, which discusses some aspects of business unionism. But that is also not a perfect redirect destination. If no one knows of a better destination, i think it would be appropriate to create a new page specifically for business unionism. Richard Myers (talk) 16:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New resource 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Company union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070919135734/http://www.afl.org/campaigns-issues/Phony_Unions/default.cfm to http://www.afl.org/campaigns-issues/Phony_Unions/default.cfm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080406042043/http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/dossiers/elections-prudhomales/elections1997.shtml to http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/dossiers/elections-prudhomales/elections1997.shtml
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120711052820/http://istravail.com/article100.html to http://istravail.com/article100.html
*Added  tag to http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=107&subid=297&contentid=626
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051126181117/http://www.dlc.org/ to http://www.dlc.org/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929040713/http://www.global-labour.org/large.htm to http://www.global-labour.org/large.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928043256/http://www.ueinternational.org/Mexico_info/mlna_articles.php?id=116 to http://www.ueinternational.org/Mexico_info/mlna_articles.php?id=116
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070831013642/http://www.nlrb.gov/index.aspx to http://www.nlrb.gov/index.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Currently this article uses old school academic references without direct linking, making it hard to verify sources, while linking to references in notes section. It's not breaking any rules, but would be nice to make it comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout and clean up.  Shushugah (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup references/notes