lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Articularis genus muscle

message: Is it possible to ad a picture of the actual muscle on this article somehow? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 18:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of the muslce itself
Talk:Adductor muscles of the hip

message: The article is named "Adductor muscles of the hip" but all my references address them as muscles of the thigh.  Here on Wikipedia they are present in :Category:Thigh muscles but absent in :Category:Hip muscles.  Should this page be renamed Adductor muscles of the thigh?  --Gongoozler123 (talk) 07:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a redirect from the term. JakobSteenberg (talk) 14:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hip or thigh? 

message: According to the articles about pectineus muscle, gracilis muscle and gluteus maximus muscle the data about the innervation and the effect of these muscles as described in this article are wrong. Nl-Koosg (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  fault 

message: I'm trying to figure out the name of this distinct shape on the inner thigh.
Or don't these (the external visible shapes) have a specific name, so that we have to call them by the underlying muscles or ligaments tendons? And if so, which are those? --80.217.2.28 (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose you mean the tendon of adductor longus muscle. This muscle is inserted at the pubic bone and there its tendon can be felt. Koosg (talk) 00:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are these body parts called? 
Talk:Gracilis muscle

message: Does this muscle tend to internally or externally rotate the hip joint? It looks like it ideally pulls to neutral position so it seems like something that would perform either action to return to neutral position if deviating from it. It's hard to tell though because I don't well understand how it wraps around and attaches to the tibia, could this be better clarified? Dictabeard (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rotation actions

message: There's a reference for a statement that this muscle is a knee flexor, and it being an adductor seems like common sense, but could someone verify if there are claims this muscle is a hip flexor as well? This has been called into question. DB (talk) 21:20, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for hip flexion

message: i would suggest "spindly" instead of "slender" for latin "gracilis" - but i would like someone else's approval  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klett (talk • contribs) 22:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation of latin "gracilis" - i suggest "spindly" instead of "slender"; closer to literal meaning which involves thin and slender, but also weak, frail, meagre...requires someone else's approval
Talk:Adductor brevis muscle

message: Innervation is from the anterior branch of obturator nerve.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.179.124.219 (talk) 03:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, according to this reference, the adductor brevis is "innervated dually by the anterior and posterior branches of the obturator nerve". --Gongoozler123 (talk) 00:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Innervation
Talk:Adductor longus muscle

message: I think it should be inferior to the obturator crest instead of the pubic crest. I am using frank netter atlas and I can't find the pubic crest anywhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander889 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  obturator crest or pubic crest?
Talk:Adductor magnus muscle

message: The illustration has the label for the sartorius muscle cut off.
216.36.132.66 (talk) 19:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Label Missing

message: The following text was located in the very bottom of the page, below templates, had no wikilinks or other formate changed and was most likely copy/pasted in. I will leave it here until it can be proper integrated into the article: JakobSteenberg (talk) 12:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved text
Talk:Semitendinosus muscle

message: Does anyone know why there are two separate muscles -- the semimembranosus and semitendinosus -- with almost identical insertion and attachment points? Presumably there must be some difference in the action. From introspection of my own body it seems that the semimembranosus has more of a knee medial rotation action than does the semitendinosus, but all the references I can find list identical actions for both muscles. Grover cleveland (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference in action from semimembranosus?
Talk:Semimembranosus muscle

message: Does anyone know why there are two separate muscles -- the semimembranosus and semitendinosus -- with almost identical insertion and attachment points?  Presumably there must be some difference in the action.  From introspection of my own body it seems that the semimembranosus has more of a knee medial rotation action than does the semitendinosus, but all the references I can find list identical actions for both muscles.  Grover cleveland (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference in action from semitendinosus?

message: Infobox is far too large for article. Also relevant muscle is only in lower part of image. Cannot find another image to use and do not know how to reduce the size in the infobox. Iztwoz (talk) 10:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Image size
Talk:Laminated bow

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: "Laminated bows were rare in most of the world before modern waterproof glues became widely available, almost unknown before about 1900CE" 
This is clearly false. cf. bows in tomb from Tutanchamun, Scythian and Achaementid bows. Any 'cupid' (e.g. Greco-Roman art) can only be laminated.
Cf. e.g. C. Zutterman, The bow in the ancient Near East, a re-evaluation of archery from the late 2nd millennium to the end of the Achaemenid empire, IrAnt 38, 2003, 119‒65
The purpose of the gorytus is to prevent the bow from getting wet.
Bishop & Coulston Roman military equipment, 1989 show the Roman bow laths which survived, although the wood did not.
Azd0815 (talk) 11:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment. In addition to failing to acknowledge the laminated bows of classical antiquity and the bronze age, this page contained falsified information to suggest that laminated bows existed in the Japanese Jomon period, which is false. They are about 1000 years old in Japan. - Hunan201p (talk) 02:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment attributed to Azd0815
Talk:List of compositions by Carl Nielsen (version 2)

message: Serious POV in the introductory paragraphs. While my own preference wouldn't be for rating the works against each other at all, this is utopian; the site does require citing someone when you do so, however. Schissel | Sound the Note! 11:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The commentary is a bit strong for being uncited.  In my opinion, its unnecessary on a list page.  Anyhow, that section is entirely the work of a single edit of User:Dono from back in early 2007.  That editor is still active on Nielsen articles.  We could ask if he'd be interested in toning down the introduction.DavidRF (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Thank you for taking notes of this list (I think nobody will notice this list at all). I have to admit that when I wrote the introductory paragraph I wasn't aware of the tone, and during the past few years I revisited this list on several occasions and said to myself "man, I should have written it better", though I never attempted a rewrite. Finally someone sees the problem and thank you. Yes, I am happy to rewrite it but I can only do it at least few months later. For now I will remove the paragraphs to avoid the tone and citation problems. Dono (talk) 06:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV in intro

message: I will try to make a sortable list of the compositions, to replace the listings by FS and OP. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sortable list
Talk:Quadrate tubercle

message: Is the tubercle of the femur the same as the quadrate tubercle of the femur?  The quadrate tubercle is on the posterior side of the femur, on the intertrochanteric crest.  However, this article's picture shows an anterior view of the femur, which is either confusing or just incorrect.  Furthermore, at least one article that contains "quadrate tubercle of the femur" links to this article as if these two terms were synonyms. (quadratus femoris)  Could someone please clarify this point?Bobsagat (talk) 00:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not 100% sue on this (I will check with Arcadian) but based on this:  I would say that they are similar (although it is not said so in that PDF. They seem to be describing one and the same thing. If so a redirect of those terms would be in order. But yeah I will check with arcadian first (he is an anatomy expert). Cheers.Calaka (talk) 00:31, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Beer/WikiProject Beer collaboration

message: I've borrowed (ok, stolen) a lot of stuff on this project page from Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Collaboration, but there's still more there that we could use. Additionally, we might want to look around at some other examples to see other ways of doing things, and we may even (gasp!) want to think up some of our own additions and modifications.
Also, I think at least one of the templates still needs to be created (or an existing one modified) to include information on which article is the current collaboration. Maybe there's other incomplete stuff, too.
Finally, I don't know if "...of the month" is an appopriate timeline, and there are other numbers that could be adjusted too, but I guess we can always change those things on the fly, and adapt to whatever level of participation exists. --Daniel11 10:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding more infrastructure to the Beer collaboration 

message: Why is beer in the arts section? I don't think it is an art! helping make wiki better- dagurlwonder 03:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a quick thing... 

message: I'm available to work with someone on a subproject.  Just let me know.  I'd like to do an article on Herrenhauser beer, if someone else is interested.  I happen to like the beer, and it comes from Hannover, Germany.  Right me a note!--THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 03:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking to Collaborate?
Talk:Silverfall

message: Can someone who paid more attention to the game add a section on the bugs that existed at launch? StarkeRealm (talk) 07:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bugs 

message: Simplified and got rid of a  lot of small issues I noticed with plot section, also added the reception section. Not sure if it's sufficencet for the editoral standards but it's a start- 96.81.143.81 (talk) 21:30, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up Plot
Talk:Linea aspera

message: For anyone new to Anatomy, this article is difficult to understand 
what and where Linea Aspera is located and its function without proper 
visuals, explanation and images. Machn (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image and Explanation 
Talk:Michael Joe Costello

message: Not sure if Irish Republican classification is entirely appropriate.
Costello was certainly a member of the pre-Truce IRA and was involved in the Civil War (Free State Army),
but his main contribution to Irish History was during The Emergency period.
:Point taken, but it's therefore likely that he'll be covered in the source material we use, and not all editors from the project concentrate specifically on Republican related articles, and would be happy to improve any peripherally related articles. If the template is here, editors from the project know the article exists and may be able to improve it. One Night In Hackney303 13:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Notting Hill Gate tube station

message: I'd be very interested if anyone has or can find any images of what the entrances to the pre-1960's stations looked like, and where they were relative to now. A building on Notting Hill Gate, currently the Bargain Bookshop, has the styling similar to that of a tube station - blue and white rectangular tiles, I'm wondering if this was the central line station or if its a later building. EAi 01:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a link to a picture of the original Central Line station building in the external links section. The original District Line station was on the south side of Notting Hill Gate directly opposite the end of Pembridge Gardens. The Central Line station was on the west side of Pembridge Gardens at the corner with Notting Hill Gate.--DavidCane 01:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Leyton tube station

message: Why does the article say it's the most used station? This can't possibly be true. It's only got 2 platforms for goodness sake. Are you saying that it's used more than Bank, Oxford Circus, Liverpool Street etc etc etc...--Tuzapicabit (talk) 18:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's obviously a joke addition. I've removed it. — Hex (❝?!❞) 21:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Most used?
Talk:103rd Airlift Wing

message: With the 103rd Fighter Wing losing its A-10s and gaining a C-21 mission, it is being redesignated the 103d Airlift Wing.  According to an official job offering CTANG Job Vacancies with the wing, the unit was already redesignated as the 103d Airlift Wing by June 2007.  67.169.155.123 05:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redesignation as the 103d Airlift Wing

message: If you knew the wing was renamed, why not just move the page to 103d Airlift Wing (changing the title)?TDRSS 00:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: So I gotta ask...

message: Article body needs context. Blnguyen  (vote in the photo straw poll) 02:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  context 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 13:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:104th Fighter Wing

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.  Coverage of Topic needs to be expanded  --dashiellx (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:106th Rescue Wing

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.  Copy Edit needed    --dashiellx (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Wikipedia talk:Special:PrefixIndex

message: In Google search, try the following (quote marks included): 
* "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/*%s"
* "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ * %s" 
where you replace "%s" with the suffix you're interested in. It's imperfect but useful. — ¾-10 20:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Google search trick to help with suffixes

message: I wish to search all articles (and exclude redirects) that start with Dr without the dot after it. I understand that I cannot enclose the search term with quotes. If it was allowed, I only had to enter "Dr " with a space. But giving Dr followed by a space, is not working as the search seems to be removing the trailing space. Giving Dr. with a space after it also is returning results (such as Dr.I) that do not have space after Dr. .  Jay (Talk) 08:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Jay, You might want to try a regex search e.g. intitle:/Dr/ ― Qwerfjkltalk 08:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I forgot to inform that I had reposted this some months later at Help talk:Searching#Search with trailing space and got a response.  Jay (talk) 08:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Search with trailing space 

message: Is there any way to subst the special page? 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 19:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not the obvious way 1, 2. And the mw:Special:PrefixIndex links back to this enwiki page for documentation, I don't see any docs on the mediawiki site, nor does there exist an mw:Project:Special:PrefixIndex, like there is a en:Project:Special:PrefixIndex. I did figure you tried all that but I'm replying again just to see if anyone else with this on their watchlist has an ideas. Sorry  Happy Editing--IAmChaos 03:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused by what you mean - 's documentation does it just fine, and your diff seems to be working as expected - what is what you expect to happen when you transclude substitute it, @EpicPupper @IAmChaos? casualdejekyll 22:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: When subst'ing? I would hope to just paste the contents that appeared in the transclusion. Yes transcluding works. Substing doesn't, look at my second diff above.  Happy Editing--IAmChaos 23:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. Um. Hmm. What a pickle... casualdejekyll 23:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

text: Did you ever find a solution for this? Fuzzyketchup (talk) 05:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Fuzzyketchup, I'm fairly sure this is impossible to subst. — Qwerfjkltalk 09:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Fuzzyketchup I find that most use-cases for substitution can be approached in different, more efficent ways :) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substing this page?
Talk:111th Attack Wing

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.   --dashiellx (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:113th Wing

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.   --dashiellx (talk) 17:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:115th Fighter Wing

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.    --dashiellx (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reassessed as stub class: article has no references.--Danger (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: : The 115th Fighter Wing was first organized in 1950 as the 128th Fighter Wing.
: The unit organized in 1956 as the 115th Fighter Group (AD) is now the 115th Operations Group
: The 128th Air Refueling Wing was first organized in 1946 as the 128th Fighter Group
: The 128th Operations Group is a new unit (1994) --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wisconsin ANG units
Talk:Cone cow

message: This article now contains more than one link to it, and I don't think it will get too many more.  Also, I doubt it will ever move past stub status.  However, I do not think the article should be deleted and there is nothing I can agree with to merge it to.  I removed the orphan status.  Zab 10:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan Status

message: Noted web comedian/author/gadabout Lore Sjoberg named this article as the winner of his "Least Notable Article on Wikipedia" contest. See Least-Notable Wikipedia Article Contest Results . Runners up included the Pumpkin-headed deer, the Feynman point, and A Very Dull Year in Ireland. Brian Schlosser42 03:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Least Notable 

message: I can find three ghits for cone cow that relate to this topic and two are sites mocking wikipedia for including a page on it (see above). This subject thus appears totally non-notable and worthy only of deletion. Bigdaddy1981 22:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged for Deletion

message: This article has been tossed around and orphaned for awhile, so I merged it to a place where I think it made sense to. ZabMilenko 03:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged to [[Conifer cone#Cone cows]]
MediaWiki talk:Prefixindex-summary

message: Add "Discuss this special page at Wikipedia talk:Special:Prefixindex" to this message – in line with a similar arrangement at, for example, Special:DoubleRedirects and Wikipedia talk:Special:DoubleRedirects. Thanks – Gurch 10:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done. CMummert · talk 14:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion page 

message: Currently, it says this:
:Discuss this special page at Wikipedia talk:Special:PrefixIndex.
I think it would better if it said this:
:Documentation and discussion for this special page (as well as transclusion instructions) can be found here.
Right now, it doesn't mention that you can transclude the page at all, which I think is pretty significant information (and extremely counterintuitive, lol -- it took me quite some time to figure that out). Hopefully this can give succor to some other lost editors. jp×g 18:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: here is an WP:ACCESS antipattern. I've added something about its use in transclusion, which should maybe be a link to the MediaWiki help pages where that's discussed. Izno (talk) 00:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation page
Talk:16th Special Operations Wing

message: This unit was not disbanded, rather it was renamed 1st Special Operations Wing (1 SOW).  As such the 1 SOW now carries it's history.  Do we need a seporate page for the 16 SOW or should it be incorporated into the 1 SOW page?Ndunruh (talk) 21:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
MediaWiki talk:Ipblocklist-summary

message: 
Add "Discuss this special page at Wikipedia talk:Special:Ipblocklist" to this message – in line with a similar arrangement at, for example, Special:DoubleRedirects and Wikipedia talk:Special:DoubleRedirects. Thanks – Gurch 10:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --ais523 11:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion page 

message: Since we a Tools: prefix let's use it Change the following
From:
   this tool
   this tool
To:
   this tool
   this tool
which produces this tool and this tool.  And while we're changing it could we give the links a little bit more unique titles?—Dispenser (talk) 05:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited it. Toolserver seems to be down at the moment, though. — Carl (CBM · talk) 23:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This "Tools:" prefix thing is buggy -- the link to my tool isn't working because it escapes the special characters of the "?db=enwiki_p" part of the URL, thus giving a 404 as the browser tries to access the nonexistent page "rbhelper.php%3Fdb%3Denwiki_p", instead of the page "rbhelper.php" with arguments. A bug report should probably be filed about this. krimpet✽ 10:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tools:]] prefix 

message: The link to the autoblock tool isn't working anymore because the Toolserver has been shut down. It looks like X!'s Autoblock tool might be a drop-in replacement. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 21:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toolserver 

message: Remove "a tool is avaliable to search for autoblocks", since the tool doesn't work (it redirects to mw:Special:MyLanguage/Autoblock) * Pppery * it has begun... 02:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 17 May 2020
Talk:322d Air Expeditionary Group

message: Should this complaint about current difficulty in getting information be in the article?  -- SEWilco (talk) 16:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whining in article 

message: This needs to be split into two articles (beyond my skills).  One should be for the 322nd Air Expeditionary Group and the other for the 322nd Tactical Airlift Wing.  They are two different units, as shown by one of the sources quoted for their lineage, Ravenstein's Combat Wings and by the official factsheet for the group. http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=17746  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lineagegeek (talk • contribs) 22:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors in Article