Talk:Hinduism in the United Kingdom

message: i have seen a black family worshipping in East Ham Temple and a number of whites in ISKCON temple off oxford street. As also, the case of Gearge Harrison was not mentioned. 
So, added the section "interest in Britan" Any one who can think of a bettter title is welcome to change it. --Hydman 12:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  added the section on Non South Asians 

message: Wasn't there a Ganesh statue that drank milk in the UK?--Dangerous-Boy 21:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ganesh statue that drank milk? 

message: I have moved the article to Hinduism in the United Kingdom (from Hinduism in United Kingdom), as it is a more accurate name for the country.  Furthermore, as What Links Here suggests, this article name is more sought after, which is possibly because other articles (I'm thinking predominantly of Islam in the United Kingdom) follow this formula. Bastin8 18:55, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move 

message: I don't like the info box describing England as a Region. Can anyone change it? I can't see how to. Cheers Fishiehelper2 (talk) 21:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  England not a region 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hinduism in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121114112622/http://www.mandir.org/news%26events/2007/11/trhvisit/index.htm to http://www.mandir.org/news%26events/2007/11/trhvisit/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Now that the copyvio has been removed, there's essentially nothing left in that page. Based on what is (and what was) in the page, the topic does not begin to meet our notability guideline for organisations. It would make sense to mention it briefly here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you,  – I'd completely forgotten about this. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Hindu Council UK]] into [[Hinduism in the United Kingdom]] 

message: > Among those of Indian origins, Hindus in the United Kingdom (27%) constituted the second largest group after Muslims of undivided India (57%), and exceeded Sikhs (14%) in the 2011 census of the United Kingdom.
This is not found in the cited source, which breaks down population by local authority, and the census only gathers ethnic identity by:
Asian/Asian British: Indian
Asian/Asian British: Pakistani
Asian/Asian British: Bangladeshi
Asian/Asian British: Chinese
Asian/Asian British: Other Asian
Which I presume Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi were totalled to produce a figure for "undivided india". 
This is:
* Innaccurate, as it discounts some territory found in the concept of "undivided india"(Myanmar/Burma, for example)
* Original research(I think- adding these togehter is
* Uncited to the actual data used for the original research.
* A long way from NPOV! the concept is tied to a specific political stance, as is documented on wikipedia. I think including Pakistani people under this category is quite obviously going to lead to issues. 
I've currently cut it: I'm not sure it's central to the lead paragraph, but if we wanted to have a breakdown of how much of a given community is hindu, we could use the Asian/Asian british or Asian/Asian British:Inidan data? Adacable (talk) 11:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, Original research(I think- adding these togehter is individual research, and not actually possible using the data source cited. Adacable (talk) 11:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "undivided india" and the census data