lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Colosseum (band)

message: I've altered the reference to the title of the second album. Although the long work which takes up side 2 of the original LP is called "The Valentyne Suite", the album title is simply "Valentyne Suite". Because of this discrepancy, I've left the sic in the text. Jon Rob 10:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The page for the album itself will need to be moved to one with the corrected name, and the pages for the albums before and after it will also need to be corrected.  I don't have time at the moment, but perhaps I can get to it later if no one else does first.  Laszlo Panaflex 15:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These corrections have now been made.  Laszlo Panaflex 20:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album title 

message: A better source is needed for the band's current lineup. The Facebook post currently referenced no longer exists and doesn't appear to have been archived. Jah77 (talk) 12:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current lineup
Talk:Hohenzollern Bridge

message: I've added infoboxes for the current bridge, the previous bridge, and the one before that, called Dombrücke.  There's a German article de:Dombrücke which really should be translated to English, which should then receive the Dombrücke infobox.  I don't know German beyond knowing that "brücke" seems to be German for "bridge", so I'm not the one to translate.  In the meantime, I'll just leave the infobox here. - Denimadept (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for your work Denimadept! There is a proposal to move this article (and others) to a new naming convention, in this case Hohenzollern Viaduct. You may respond to that if you'd like. I'll add the Dombrücke to my To Do list, not sure when I'll be able to get to it though. -- Eddyspeeder (talk) 12:43, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter that much to me.  I like the idea of using the name the natives use, but translating it works too.  Whether it's a "viaduct" or a "bridge" or a "brücke", "pont", "ponte", "most", or whatever, is not so much up to me.  I just edit them, and create them using names that are documented somewhere.  Did one last night, in fact. - Denimadept (talk) 18:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Originally I created Göltzschtalbrücke (I really like that name) but Wikipedia prefers translated names. So when I found out there was some inconsistency between bridges, I started a discussion and the [Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Germany/Conventions|WikiProject Germany conventions]] have been changed accordingly. Best regards, Eddyspeeder (talk) 18:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have translated de:Dombrücke to Cathedral Bridge. The infobox from this page by Denimadept has been moved there. Thanks! --Eddyspeeder (talk) 14:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dombrücke

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Hohenzollernbrücke Köln.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 17, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-08-17. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 23:01, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Hohenzollernbrücke Köln.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Shouldn't there be something to distinguish the two infoboxes? I assume the top one is for the current bridge, and the lower one for its pre-war incarnation, but this isn't made clear. Are two infoboxes in fact necessary at all? Lancevortex (talk) 10:23, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoboxes
Talk:1906 Salisbury rail crash

message: Several of the points in this article are not borne out by Major Pringle's report, which is the only primary factual information we have. 
Also it distorts the article to say upfront "A and B were claimed, but these claims were not supported by factual evidence".
I'll try to modify the article shortly. Afterbrunel (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: There's a clear consensus for this and no reasonable or conceivable arguments to the opposite. Closing per WP:SNOW.  RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  18:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Salisbury rail crash →  – There are now two articles on rail crashes near Salisbury: this one and the 2021 one. So better to add the year to the 1906 article, and make Salisbury rail crash into a DAB page, as neither looks like it'll be a clear primary topic in the long run. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 November 2021 

message: I see only one citation on this page. It clearly needs more. I'm putting up the necessary template. 174.0.253.201 (talk) 01:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: [T]he cause in each case was recorded as Driver Error but there has been much speculation since.
:What other causes have been suggested? Valetude (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The three derailments
Talk:Work spouse

message: My husband has several female friends at work (he is a teacher). He even refers to one friend as his "office wife"-- they discuss personal issues, bring each other treats and little gifts, etc. He sees nothing wrong with this relationship, but has made it clear that he alone will be her friend, that is, their friendship is OUTSIDE of our marriage. Just because there is no sex (he is physically unattracted to her), doesn't mean that it is any less painful. It belittles the institution and sanctity of marriage, and has negatively impacted my self esteem. Right is right, wrong is wrong, and anyone who says there can be both is purposefully minimizing immature, self-serving behavior.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.38.89.213 (talk) 18:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lady, you have issues. 204.19.47.235 (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal comment 

message: It would be good to know whether the phrase is specific to the US or not. Discussing it with random people online came up with an instance of it apparently being used by the BBC, but all of the references here are US and I'd never come across it before (Australia). So should this be listed as a US slang or colloquial expression? CheMonro (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional idiom ?
Talk:Southall rail crash

message: Pdiddyjr please provide a link to the BBC news page you refer to in your edit. LongRobin79(talk) 23:29, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driver distraction 

message: I've just reverted an edit to the infobox that said that the cause of the SPAD was equipment failure. You cannot blame the AWS being switched off as being the cause of the SPAD - the driver is supposed to obey the signals regardless of whether the AWS is working or not. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of the crash 

message: The article says that "At the time there was no requirement for the signaller to have been informed that the HST was in service with its AWS isolated". However paragraph 6.17 of the The Southall Rail Accident Inquiry Report states that "the proper procedure
was for the AWS fault to be reported to a signalman". I can't find any reference for the former and so I think that the article should be updated to the latter. If I don't get any objections within a few days, I will make this change. Zin92 (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requirement for the signaller to have been informed that the HST was in service with its AWS isolated
Talk:Winsford railway accident

message: I am trying to move the categories to the more distinctive redirect pages, but I have to give them useful names first, that is, use the year. (EDIT) These are the new redirect pages that received all the useful categories: Winsford rail accident (1948), Coppenhall Junction rail crash (1962), Winsford rail crash (1999) For this, I have to check all referring pages whether they use the expected link. Quite some work for little result. Actually, the article should be split up, copying content+versions to the pages that are becoming the distinctive redirects. --Mopskatze (talk) 22:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization is a mess 

message: This article is a random collection of largely unrelated events - in each case there is scope for an article.  I know it isn't the only one that's like this, some others need fixing too.
I note that I moved these to new articles but they were summarily deleted with nonsensical accusations of "copyright violations".
Here are the article titles that I suggest.
I suggest we also have to leave this article as a disambiguation page as there may be historical links to it (e.g. from outside of Wikipedia).
If no-one has any rational objections I will go ahead and create the new articles from the existing text. 
Tony May (talk) 02:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: OK - I have split it.Tony May (talk) 06:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be split
Category talk:Railway accidents and incidents in the United Kingdom

message: It would be a good idea if all subsequent articles were called the same thing, IMO. "Rail disaster" is more broadly based than "rail crash"; and of course "rail accident" is even better! - some accidents happen because a train falls off an embankment for example! Peter Shearan 13:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article names
Talk:Invergowrie rail accident

message: In this accident, the signal was only slightly in the wrong position, 4 degrees out of 45 degrees.  Most drivers would surely have regarded it as a stop signal.  The driver in question had slowed down for an earlier signal, which indicates that he was paying reasonable attention.  Maybe he was distracted by something, which caused the fatal error.
:Aye; in Danger Signals, Stanley Hall speculated that the driver may only have glanced at it for a moment, concluded that it was clear, then set off. Goose 18:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong position 
Talk:Douglas Cliggott

message: I propose this should be moved Category. He is not an Economist.Trade2tradewell 11:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mernda

message: When was Mernda disconnected from the Vic rail system?
When did Vicrail stop being responsible for the Melbourne/Mernda/Whittlesea bus service?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.147.84.38 (talk) 03:32, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rail 
Talk:Frankford Avenue Bridge

message: Since there are two NRHP bridges in Philadelphia named "Frankford Avenue Bridge," I'm suggesting a rename of both the articles and the commons categories as "Frankford Avenue Bridge (Pennypack Creek) and Frankford Avenue Bridge (Poquessing Creek). ---------User:DanTD (talk)  04:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You had used :Template:Split dab, which I changed to :Template:Split because this is not a disambiguation page. However, I don't think that splitting the page is the proper term for what you're proposing, though, because there is no information about the Poquessing Creek bridge on this article except for a link to the article on Poquessing Creek in the "See also" section. That article has a little bit of information and a few external links about the bridge you're referring to, so if you're going to split any article it would be that one, but what you're proposing sounds more like creating a new article about the Poquessing Creek bridge and renaming this article to disambiguate the two. Evil Sith Lord (talk) 06:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Then I agree that the Frankford Avenue Bridge (Poquessing Creek) should be split from the Poquessing Creek article. But there should still be some disambiguation between the two Frankford Avenue Bridges. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  03:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split request
Talk:Initiatives to raise the age of consent

message: Some individuals or groups support initiatives... Who? Which individuals and which groups? See Wikipedia's policy on weasle words.  -Neural 11:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the proposed-merge tags. This article is too insubstantial and vague to be merged with anything in its current state. If this article is going to remain as just a vague reference to some groups and some individuals trying to change some aoc laws in some countries and some juristictions, I will put up a proposed-delete tag. This article is currently nowhere approaching the standards of a Wikipedia article, and has no real info in it to justify its existence. -Neural 03:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is exactly why it SHOULD be merged. It can make a perfectly valid article subsection. --tjstrf 03:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge what exactly? This entire article's text already has been added to age of consent and it's existence there is tenuous at best due to it being a completely weasle-worded passage. --Monotonehell 11:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is exactly why it SHOULD be merged. It can make a perfectly valid article subsection. Perfectly valid? It is just a loose collection of weasle words as it stands. And to repeat Monotonehell, it is already a subsection of the AOC page, although it is so vague. If this article does not improve fairly soon, I suggest deletion... -Neural 12:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words|Weasle words]]

message: Thirteen percent of respondents in Britain believe that age of consent should be raised to 18 in the United Kingdom, ... By contrast, 34% of the participants want age of consent to lower to 14 in Britain, whereas 18% of them consider it should be raised to 18.
Don't the percentages for raising to 18 seem to contradict? Is it 13% or 18%? -Neural 11:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the link given in the article, the 18% figure referred to something else entirely - the proportion wanting it abolished. I've corrected the text. -- Avenue 12:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poll
Talk:1995 France bombings

message: You do not mention the bombing that occurred at the RER station Port Royal in 1995. (I am unsure of the exact date but I had taken the train there an hour earlier. It did happen.)
The bombing occured in 1996, but i think it is very much related, here are links:
http://articles.latimes.com/1996-12-04/news/mn-5530_1_paris-train
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/04/world/2-die-as-terrorist-bomb-rips-train-at-a-paris-station.html
http://edition.cnn.com/WORLD/9612/03/subway.explosion/
"a French citizen born in France"? what's the point of saying this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.3.200 (talk) 17:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's with the Railway Accidents in 1995 box at the bottom? These weren't accidents. 115.188.208.161 (talk) 03:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Accidents" 
Talk:Crestmont Farms, Philadelphia

message: Removed as original research: "Although now demolished, there was at one time (possibly as late as the 1980's?) a community pool." I remember this pool too (even swam in it once in the mid-1960s). This sorely needs a reference and should be more specific (surely we can do better than "at one time"). Also, what was the name of the pool? To whom was it open?--BillFlis 12:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pool
Talk:Bloody Run (Poquessing Creek tributary)

message: I reside next to the the creek in question, and the location of the battle has been said to be located at or near present day Laura Lane. 
We do not seem to have much noted regarding the battle....it could be just one of many skirmishes that occured during the Revolutionary War. The creek was named, not the battle. It's a small creek, picturesque even. 
It should be noted that one great famous individual from Somerton has not been named in the article Someton, Philadelphia, and who was born near the area of the Bloody Run(or Bloody Mill Run depending on who you speak to here), and that was Dr. Benjamin Rush.
You may be able to find more information at the website of Friends of Poquessing Watershed of Philadelphia and Bucks County.
  69.249.125.97 (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location, Location, Location!
Talk:City Night Line

message: Hi, I have changed the article. One problem: The train class here is called "DB City Night Line", which is wrong. The name is simply "City Night Line (CNL)". The DB is an old way of branding trains within DB and no longer in use.
Best regards,
--Alex 60489 (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Samuel Powel

message: Powel was the son of one Philadelphia's richest men, Samuel Powell the Elder. We know from the first source here that Powell paid more taxes than someone who was probably richer, William Allen, but the taxes were probably on property within the the city, and we know from the second source that the father's wealth came as the builder and owner of a significant number of properties. Allen, on the other hand, made his fortune from his shipping firm and then various other enterprises, including land outside the city, and there probably weren't any taxes on income.
Also not mentioned is that the younger Powel for some reason dropped the extra "l" in his name and is sometimes referred to with the suffix Junior. Nor is it mentioned that Junior not only served in the State Senate (which is noted) but was Speaker from 1792, the beginning of his first term, through his death in 1793. I'm not sure but it seems Senate terms were only for one year, or at least according to the Senate source.
I doubt anyone will notice these notes anytime soon, but I'll try to dig up some additional information for updating the article. Because Powel wasn't involved politically during the revolutionary period, he's not that important, but the family's wealth is of interest. What happened to it? Did Powel the Younger have children? I hope to find out.
I'll leave a note here if I've updated anything or find other information of interest in case anyone else gets on "the case." Allreet (talk) 15:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, the Senate bio mentions that a nephew adopted by the sister of Powel's wife inherited the "immense fortune". Allreet (talk) 15:47, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing details
Talk:SONICFLOOd

message: ==Merger==
Please see discussion of the proposed merger here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giler (talk • contribs) 
:Merger completed. —Black and White (TALKCONTRIBS) 03:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Please see discussion of the proposed merger here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giler (talk • contribs) 
:Merger completed. —Black and White (TALKCONTRIBS) 03:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Rejsekort

message: €200.000 to €270.000 for the whole nationwide system seems a little low to me.  Are there some 0s missing, perhaps? Daen 11:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right – one zero was missing. Ghent 14:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if it's 2 to 2.7 million Euros, that still seems very cheap ...  Daen 13:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Answering my own question ... http://www.rejsekort.dk/FAQ-145.aspx#FAQ4 (1.5 to 2 billion Danish Kroner - that's 200 to 270 million Euros) Daen 13:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total Pricing? 

message: This system seems astonishingly bureaucratic in operation: is there any reference to this that can be used in the article?  Issue of a Rejsekort requires two complex forms to be completed, one of which has a long preamble essentially saying it is complicated because it has to be complicated to prevent money laundering.  How?  What?  When you can walk up to the counter in (say) Lisbon or Baku, and buy a smart card that does exactly the same as the Rejsekort, one has to ask why it is that Copenhagen is different. Gordoncph (talk) 17:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complex implementation
Talk:M3 motorway (Northern Ireland)

message: Does this article still need to be marked as a stub? It's already got quite a bit of information. Is it time to remove the stub marker?
Tireoghain2 11:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alpha Pyxidis

message: Is there a reason for this change in value? ChiZeroOne (talk) 10:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why that change was made, but the reference doesn't appear to contain any of the data that it is being used to cite. Regards, RJH (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value change
Talk:Rongbuk Monastery

message: Where does the k in Rongbuk come from? It's not in the Tibetan name given in this article. And why is it not Rongpu with a p? —Babelfisch 12:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, I thought of that, too. Rongbuk does seem to be the more common English name. Perhaps it is some local dialect of Tibetan? Or perhaps it is influenced one of the numerous unrelated languages spoken in the Himalayas? In any event, Rongbuk appears to be the most common name in English.—Nat Krause(Talk!) 14:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't see the k. —Babelfisch 07:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Nobody asked me, but this article is written poorly. This reads more like a narrative of a novel than an encyclopedia article. Phrases such as "It [has] the most dramatic views in the world" simply do not belong in this article. Riobranden 18:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * Thank you -- Riobranden 19:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite? 

message: Does this article still warrant being called a stub?  What more can be added?  Maybe a link to more detailed info/photos?  --JD79 20:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubbiness
Talk:1st New Jersey Regiment

message: I dont think the Jersey Blues where militia, but provincials. 84.23.155.84 (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Militia? 
Talk:Neo Arcadia

message: I dislike the reference system used here in this article, because it's only for websites. What if I want to reference something from a booklet or one of the Remastered Tracks? That's why I'm suggesting perhaps we can change the reference system to the one I've implemented here. Or perhaps we can use a combination of both? Wolf ODonnell 14:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you trying to reference...? List them here, please. -Randall Brackett 14:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference System