Talk:Cultural Muslims

message: Zeeshan, thanks for making this article. We can improve it if you can find some internet links on the topic to put in an exteneral links seciton. or to use to cite things. Its kinda of odd to have an entire article without a single citation. Look  forward to working with you in the future :) 12.2.239.15 14:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

message: There is a case to be made for simply allowing those that practice to define themselves, rather than those that do not. A German Christian is more likely to 'I am German' than I am a Christian. When it religious influence is queried, the response is usually, 'I am a practicing Christian'. 
As a secular, rationalist humanist, I would rather not have labels. Labels arise in context, when questioned thus: What nationality, what religion, what sect, are you practicing, etc. Genuine secular-humanists find cultural affinity as claustrophobic as religious affinity. 
There are a range of adjectives for those who ascribe to religion in various strengths - practicing, fundamentalist, non-practicing, etc. The concept of 'Cultural Muslim' does not advance does not advance our understanding, it appears to be an attempt to cling onto an identity which is riddled with conceptual problems. A person who is an adherent of Islam is a Muslim. A person who is not an adherent of Islam is not a Muslim. There is no such thing as cultural Islam. 
The concept of a non-believer from the perspective of Islam is also at best, unappealing at worse, rabidly racist. The words Kafir and Kuffar are loaded and full of the worse kinds of stigma. Would a describing yourself as a 'Cultural Muslim' allow ex-Muslims to escape such stigma?  Would 'Cultural Muslims' challenge the sigma? The most beneficial tensions in society are those of the 'other'. Those that were slaves, serfs, immigrants, etc. They were the ones that experienced racism and exclusion and fought to make the society a great deal more egalitarian. 
Allow believers to describe themselves in every diminishing forms of exclusivity but describe yourself with biggest, most inclusive denominator - a human. Wear the Kafir badge with pride!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.145.225.143 (talk) 16:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Practicing Muslim

message: Is this page another way of saying fake Muslims?  Ones perhaps who want a facade of being a Muslim to avoid discrimination in their society?  What about children who are not Muslims who's parents are and force them to dress funny for school - so they get picked on every day?  Is that perhaps what this article is about?  Culterually as in "forced to pretend to be or too young to be able to get the parents not to force you without being beaten along with your mother?"???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.173.131 (talk) 13:58, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this page a joke? Someone is either Muslim or not 

message: Why was Raki changed to şerbet?? Greatal386 23:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raki? 

message: I have edited the Kabylia section which previously stated that "Kuffar" is Arabic for "apostates". It is not. The Arabic word "Kuffar" is the plural of "Kafir" which means "disbeliever". An apostate is called "Murtad" in Arabic. In Islamic terminology the "Kafir" is one who has openly rejected Islam. The "Murtad" is a type of "Kafir", but specifically someone who was a practicing and believing Muslim who abandoned Islam.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.200.208.170 (talk) 21:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kuffar" does not mean "apostates" 

message: Quote: " In non-Muslim societies, such Muslims may subscribe to, and be vested with, secular identities. The Muslims of Bosnia, descendants of Slavs who converted to Islam under Ottoman rule, are not always noted for attendance at prayer, abstention from alcohol, seclusion of women and other social practices associated with believing Muslims in other parts of the world. They were officially designated as Muslims to distinguish them from (Orthodox) Slavs and (Catholic) Croats under the former Yugoslavian communist regime. The label 'Muslim' indicates their ethnicity and group allegiance, but not necessarily their religious beliefs. In this limited context (which may apply to other Muslim minorities in Europe and Asia), there may be no contradiction between being Muslim and being atheist or agnostic, just as there are Jewish atheists and Jewish agnostics... It should be noted, however, that this secular definition of Muslim (sometimes the terms 'cultural Muslim' or 'nominal Muslim' are used) is very far from being uncontested." 
You have no righ to speak about Bosnian muslims in this way!
You have no right to declare Bosnia as non-MUSLIM society.
Bosnian muslims were not Slavs!
You don't know anything about bosnian-herzegovinian people!
You have no right to declare anyone as non believer!
You can't judge belonging and level of true Islamic faith of Bosnians.
Bosnains were brutally tortured because they were members of islamic faith!
You are calling them now "non believers"?
You have no right to measure the level of their faith and their religious beliefs.
You have no right to compare them to other 'believing Muslims'.
Who are other 'Believing Muslims'?
In other parts of world people "all people" are believers? True followers of Islam?
Why did you delete my post? Did I take your country as an example of Muslims non-believers? 
What you do is unislamic! 
What do you know about Bosnia? You don't know anything!
signature: how dare you are?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.209.233.108 (talk) 23:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When you write "you", you are presumably addressing the author of the quote with which you begin your comment. That quote is a literal quotation from page 3 of the book Islam: A Very Short Introduction by Malise Ruthven. However, it is far from sure that Dr. Ruthven is reading the comments on this talk page, so your remarks may be lost in that respect. Before you get too indignant, please note that the text does not say that the Muslims of Bosnia in general should not be considered to be Muslims on the basis of their religious beliefs, but only that among the Muslims of Bosnia there may be individuals who are identified as Muslims more for their their ethnicity and group allegiance than for their religious beliefs. Do you claim that this is false, in other words, do you think that each and every person who is considered a Bosnian Muslim, rather than a Bosnian Serb or a Bosnian Croat, is classified that way because of their beliefs?  --Lambiam 09:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How dare you are to tell me I am not true believer of Islamic faith just because I am Bosnian! 

message: I added a comment in the concept section.
The label 'Muslim' indicates their ethnicity and group allegiance, but not necessarily their religious beliefs. (Their ethnicity is officially Albanian - a wikipedia editor)
I just think it's astonishing that a Muslim scholar is so ignorant in this subject.
--Zslevi (talk) 19:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Where do you get the notion from that the ethnicity of the Bosnian Muslims is "officially" Albanian? Albanians speak the Albanian language. Bosnian Muslims speak mostly Bosnian and generally don't understand Albanian at all.  --Lambiam 22:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity: Albanian 

message: Therefore you can't ethnically be a Muslim, it's not possible. 
My grandmother is Bosnian and speaks Bosnian - Bosniak is not a language.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.134.73.159 (talk) 05:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islam is a religion, the followers are called Muslims 

message: Traditional Islam seems to redirect to the Cultural Muslim article. I dont know if thats right, since 'Traditional Islam' is generally what we use to talk about those who practice Tasawwuf; a quick google search will back me up on this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BelalHaniffa (talk • contribs) 09:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Traditional Islam' redirect 

message: Looks like an autobiography, with unverified claims and original research, reflecting the experiences and actual practices of the author(s). Tagged "original research". Behemoth (talk) 22:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiographical article 

message: :The concept of a cultural Muslim, someone who identifies as a Muslim yet is not religious, is not universally accepted in the Islamic religious community.
This is a strange statement.  Why would or should a "concept" be universally accepted?  It exists, that's all that matters.  In other words, some Muslims may identify as secular or atheist. Whether others accept this or not is irrelevant. Viriditas (talk) 02:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange statement 

message: This really needs deletion. What a strange classification: "Cultural Muslim". I am carrying out a similar request for the "Non-denominational Muslim" article. Islam has 5 "Ma-dhabs" that form the subset for ISlam. Islam is not a culture ... it is a religion.  Really should be deleted. Please discuss here before attempting to remove the deletion tag on this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:fea8:41e0:5af:7141:62b:43cb:6dc4 (talk • contribs) 
:The phrase appears in numerous books when I search Google. For example, here it is in a Routledge publication-- a very good press. I see many other osurces for the phrase. I'm going to remove your prod on this basis, but feel free to take it to AFD.104.163.152.238 (talk) 05:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for deletion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cultural Muslim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131021065544/http://www.wingia.com/web/files/news/14/file/14.pdf to http://www.wingia.com/web/files/news/14/file/14.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It is not verifiable that this photo was taken;
at Jerusalem
at Muslim quarter
and during Ramadan.
We also do not know and can not know if they are Muslim or not.
Music is not forbidden in Islam or Quran. There is even several forms of religious music. (Look for "tasavvuf musikisi")
Even if it is all true questioning peoples' beliefs and religious actions is simply wrong. 
We do not and can not know who they really are.
Photo should be removed. 176.88.103.207 (talk) 15:56, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo should be removed 

message: The following sources indicate his firmness in his belief:   
This doesn't necessarily imply he's overly religious or highly devout; it simply shows his seriousness about his beliefs, even though he leans toward a liberal outlook. If there is a category of Liberal Muslims, he belongs in that instead of this list. 182.183.0.254 (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @GenoV84 Neither of the sources states that he does not practice the faith or whether he is irreligious. It just shows that he is both a Hindu and a Muslim. 182.183.0.254 (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

text: There is a WP article about liberal and progressive Muslims; it would be more appropriate to write down a new section on that article with a list of adherents and then move Khan to that list, along with the cited sources. GenoV84 (talk) 10:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Salman Khan.