lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Great North Air Ambulance

message: The first Ansari X Prize flight of SpaceShipOne (SpaceShipOne flight 16P) carried a
teddy bear called Terence which had travelled to Iraq with
members of the Royal Air Force.  It will be auctioned off for charity.''
I moved this to the talk page because I really cannot see how it is connected with the article. If anyone cares, fill in the details and move it back in. -Lommer 01:01, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Found a BBC piece on it. The bear was being carried on behalf of GNAAS. -- Cyrius|✎ 22:50, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: (1) G-NHAE has just come into service in Cumbria. This is an N3 version which has some notable improvements to the old aircraft.
(2) The 24 hour cover that is available in the North East is now being provided for Friday and Saturday nights in Cumbria.
ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 22:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up. Of course, you are very welcome to go find references to support these changes and update the article yourself. --10mmsocket (talk) 06:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ordinarily I would do the editing myself - but I have a serious backlog of editing other articles for which I have worked on gathering a number of sources - plus real life is making demands. More importantly, I suspect that there is more fixing needed than I have identified in this article - so best that I stay out of this one and concentrate on my main areas of interest. Sources here are (at a minimum)  and local newspapers and BBC news. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 07:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Life! Noted...  --10mmsocket (talk) 08:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs updating
Talk:George W. Bush/Archive 15

message: If you look closely, someone has put the goatse.cx man on Bush's laptop. Anyone kind enough to fix this?
:Trying; can't figure out what happened. If anyone does, I'd love to hear how. --Golbez 15:49, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
Another subtle vandalism that's occurring: The picture of "George W. Bush in his national guardsman uniform" displays properly in the article but if you click on it, the enlarged version is of Hitler.  I think this has now been fixed but it may be vandalized again. JamesMLane 21:42, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed PPGMD
They put that he was born in "Hell." What? I'm not a Bush supporter, but this is a place to inform the public, not to post opinions. Andre Wong 22:08, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Vandalism...
Talk:Four (disambiguation)

message: Four (disambiguation) was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to redirect the article.
All the articles this dis-ambiguation page links to, apart from the first one, are either links in the uses section of 4 (number) or (just one) a ghost link. 66.245.124.50 01:58, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: *Oh, I see what you mean now. I thought you meant that there were multiple links on the disambig page to 4 (number). No vote right now. - RedWordSmith 03:25, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Egbert Van Alstyne

message: A number of sources give his birth year as 1882. The info at the linked site http://www.rag-time.com/fest/bio.htm plus the fact the the 1920 census lists his age as 42 seem to make the 1878 date seem the more accurate one to use. -- Infrogmation 02:23, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clitoris/discussion related to Nov 14 vote

message: Moved from Talk:Clitoris as the sheer volume of non-voting discussion on this vote had made that page unwieldy and difficult to add a vote to. --MR 02:27, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: *Isn't this poll taking too long?  I think the poll should end around October 25.  Peter O. (Talk) 22:01, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)
:What's the rush? Theresa Knott  (The torn steak) 22:09, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! Please ask them to create these images. Well-made GFDL-licensed photos and anatomical visualizations of both male and female genitalia would be extremely useful for a variety of sexology articles. -- The Anome 17:57, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Seconding the above, this would be useful regardless of the consensus that is arrived here.  Even in the unlikely event that no such images are included in this particular article they would be useful for similar articles and public resources, on Wikipedia or elsewhere. NTK 04:53, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: I do not agree, for illustrative purposes it is best to have a representative image that is large and clear enough to identify the anatomy.  However such a montage would be good to serve the secondary purpose of showing variations, if such a montage could be assembled, given the difficulty of finding copylefted photos.  NTK 04:56, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't this poll taking too long? 

message: Question You say that the image on Clitoris is pornography. How do you define that term? Previously, people opposing the image have defined it in very strange and POV ways. — David Remahl 11:35, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that only a part of the clitoris is normally visible. I know what porn is, too; in my definition it is material produced and used for the sole purpose of sexual excitation. It would be very good to have a picture of a dissection too, but showing the visible part of the clitoris doesn't make it porn. I honestly don't know what the rest you're talking about in the rest of the message (thought police, imperialism) has to do with this vote. — David Remahl 12:33, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define pornography 

message: Wikipedia already has :Image:Flushvul.gif that has not ever been censored and seems to be in the public domain. It has already been used in Vulva, Perineum and Vagina.
:Looks horrible though... --  Ævar Arnfjörð [ Bjarmason]   11:10, 2004 Oct 19 (UTC)
:I agree, these alt.sex FAQ photos are terrible.  Being in black and white distorts the subject, especially the vulva photo, and makes it look generally corpse-like.  This one should be replaced. NTK 05:13, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet another image - Found in wikipedia 

message: I have been puzzled by claims that the picture is pornographic.  Is the problem that the woman is touching her genitals? --Minority Report 21:54, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question for antis
Talk:Derek Summerfield

message: For a previous debate over the deletion of this article see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Derek Summerfield.
This article does not talk about his bio as it supposed to. Instead, it includes only anti-Israel material without even mentioning the context, any argument against is discarded as (pfeh!) "from the Israeli government and pro-Israeli advocates". Adding Totally disputed note for now (insead of VFD), hoping to see it improved. ←Humus sapiens←Talk 02:44, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This is badly informed. Summerfield has written numerous times, mainly in the BMJ, on the same topic. Because he is rather selective he elicits a hostile response every time. I doubt he needs his own Wikipedia article. I'm VFDing it. JFW | T@lk 04:35, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This needs to be written in a neutral tone, i.e. more showing how much agreement he received, also mentioning any good stuff he's done, as it risks being an attack page at the moment. special, random,Merkinsmum 22:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag
Talk:George Gimarc

message: Creation of the George Gimarc biography MPLX/MH 02:50, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was a Sunday night "Rock & Roll Alternative" junkie while a college student at UNT (then NTSU) in the 1984-1987 era, and George was my hero introducing me to many alternative bands in the proto-alternative era.  His show on KZEW on Sunday nights was very refreshing and Sunday nights in the D/FW area are still for "new" bands and for the institution of revolutions in music, still now via The Edge though it is has become more mainstream (but what used to be "alternative" is now today's mainstream rock & roll with the (thankful) death of metal and other genres....
I assumed George had a lot to do with the Edge starting up, and I appreciate the Wikipedia page...  One day I realized George was no longer around (this was around 1987?) and called to ask where he had gone...  To my chagrin, I was told, and still think this was a tongue in cheek joke that he had decided to become the campaign manager for some right wing political candidate at the time...can't recall who, but it was something along those lines...which seemed very unlikely...
Get well George, whereever you are!
DLC  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlcasey22 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Gimarc - a hero 

message: The overview talks about him being a DJ and music expert, but based on the rest of the article:
# He coined the term "classic rock."
# He was one of the first DJs for one of the first alternative stations.
There's a disconnect here or else bad information. He also seems to be a lot more connected with alternative music than classic rock, but it doesn't come across that way.
Dgpop (talk) 14:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The overview is out of line with the rest of the article
Talk:New Brunswick Liberal Association

message: This article is not currently consistent with guidance at:
*Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context
*Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)
*Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)
Many people are not aware of those guidelines. The practice of overlinking decades, solitary months, solitary years is widespread and so it is reasonable for people to conclude that it is what should be done but it is not Wikipedia style. I think links should be removed in accordance with the Manual of style guidelines. I did so but was reverted. I do not want to get into a revert war about whether the Manual of style should be implemented to improve this article. What do others think? bobblewik 19:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to dates 
Talk:Israel Shahak/Archive 1

message: I have placed this page on Wikipedia:Requests for comment in the hopes that it can break the logjam. DanKeshet 22:57, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been making e-mail inquiries into the same question.  DanKeshet 18:44, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: Apparently our mediator disappeared and the committee is looking for a replacement or maybe two.  --Zero 03:27, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Where does this stand now? Jayjg 16:32, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute Resolution/Requests for comment 

message: This article has been listed as containing an incorrect external links section.  This could not be fixed because the article is protected.  It would be appreciated if either the fix was made to the protected article, or if someone would take a moment to do so when it is no longer protected.  Thanks, —Kate | Talk 02:40, 2004 Aug 5 (UTC)
: Done. --Zero 08:29, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Nanniwan

message: Why is 南泥湾 literally "Yellow Mud Bend"? Isn't it "Southern Mud Bay"? --Menchi 03:50, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was Wang Kun (singer) (王昆) the first singer of this song? She needs an article. Badagnani (talk) 22:25, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First singer?
Talk:The Sun Sessions

message: The article states that the tape for "I Got a Woman" is lost. The number is on the track list of the album Elvis Presley (album), which has other songs from the Sun-recordings. So, is the track on that album "I Got a Woman" been re-recorded, or is it the Sun-recording, not lost? -DePiep 19:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was re-recorded at RCA, per the Elvis at Sun liner notes. --Fantailfan 19:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Got a Woman tape lost? 

message: I have recently suggested to merge Elvis at Sun to The Sun Sessions because both albums originated from the same idea, to have Elvis' Sun recordings in one place, and because it does not make sense to have two articles about very similar albums when one article would be more likely to achieve good article status. Is there any reason that the pages should not be merged or is there something better to do with the articles than merging them?Rock'N'More (talk) 18:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merger 

message: No mention is made in the article of the 1987 Sun Sessions CD, which has a slightly different track listing and includes many outtakes and alternate takes, including "Harbor Lights", "Tomorrow Night", and "When It Rains It Really Pours". Angr (talk) 20:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD 

message: They say this is one of the fundamental albums among all music Wartrex97 (talk) 20:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critucs
Talk:Multiplex (juggling)

message: please don't merge this article.  It's planned for major expansion.Pedant 04:18, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)
What is the source for section "Difficulty levels of Catching". Is it from some competition rules or...? I've never come across such things and I think that they are a matter of opinion and should be removed. Anyhow, I do not think it's essential information for understanding multiplexes.  --Pestis 09:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I have removed the section for now.  It can be reinserted later if proper sourcing turns up. Sbacle 14:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Beatles' Second Album

message: The first sentence in the 2nd paragraph states, "The Beatles' Second Album is composed exclusively of uptempo numbers.." I think this is someone's opinion, as I think you might agree the song "You really got a hold on me" is distinctly not uptempo. I'll place a fact template there for discussion. Nickrz (talk) 01:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Exclusively uptempo"? 

message: Isn't "You Can't Do That" on the stereo version of The Beatles' Second Album just fake stereo? 2601:545:8201:6290:4D7E:AEB3:6E01:F453 (talk) 20:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  You Can’t Say That!
Talk:The Times They Are a-Changin' (Bob Dylan album)

message: I'm tempted to change the genre of the album to 'folk' from 'folk rock'.  Anybody who's listened to the album would know there are no rock numbers in it.
Any objections? HWelles 04:02, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Opium Wars

message: There was already a very strong consensus for a content merge from this Opium Wars article to the First and Second Opium War articles but given that it hasn't happened yet and another three years of editing have gone into the page, I feel we should restart the discussion and see how people feel in 2014. I concur with other editors that a very strong content fork is occurring. My proposal:
# The content from Opium Wars is merged from here to the First and Second Opium War articles.
# Opium Wars is turned into a redirect to Opium War (disambiguation), which already serves as a needed link to the two conflicts
Current votes are (here)
* 
* 
* 
* , and 
*  ("Jay") 
and (here)
*  and
*  
and (here)  all in favor of the first proposal (raised by Spellcast in 2011, reraised by Kiyoweap in 2013, and now again by me here) and no one in opposition. The second proposal is new here, but it seems needless and unhelpful to maintain two separate dabs. — LlywelynII 13:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As you said, it's not actually a split, but do the policies at WP:PROSPLIT help with giving credit?  ch (talk) 06:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia covers how to credit when text is moved from one article to another. GraemeLeggett (talk) 09:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

text: and here at Wikipedia:Merging#How_to_merge GraemeLeggett (talk) 09:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not clear what you oppose. Could you clarify? The proposal is not to merge into one article, but to merge the appropriate parts of the article Opium Wars into the two articles OW1 and OW2. Thanks! ch (talk) 07:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: In a bold move to avoid cluttering up First Opium War and Second Opium War with irrelevent material during the agreed merge, I have split two sections from this article into History of opium in China, which will expand further from material drawn from Opium and a couple of other smaller articles. ► Philg88 ◄ talk 15:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split to History of opium in China 

message: Why this page wasn't merged with the other if the consensus was totally into it? Ruddah (talk) 04:54, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there. I am in the process of doing the merge. Cheers,  Philg88 ♦talk 06:39, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok then. Thx. Ruddah (talk) 18:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: . (Phew!)  Philg88 ♦talk 10:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Section is written poorly and contains either lack of citation or citation that links to non-applicable web pages e.g. a page warning about contaminated natural supplements is the cite for the bronze heads being lost overseas. 74.215.102.138 (talk) 13:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect on relics section cleanup
Talk:Amotion

message: If we're going to be writing bckgr, might as well just spell out background. Reb42 17:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Background

message: Technically, this article is now called aMotion rather than AMotion.  Is this acceptable?  Furthermore, the article lead has been change to reflect this change.  In fact, the album name is written as aMOTION on the cover.  So now I am totally confused!  Worse still, the info box still has it as Amotion...  Oh and: their previous album is under Emotive (album) rather than eMotive (album) (despite the fact that the album cover styles it eMOTIVe). Any thoughts?    --Jubilee♫clipman 04:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: aMOTION and eMOTIVe ¦ Reisio (talk) 08:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Personally I don't see what's so confusing about it. It's written aMotion on the album cover so thats clearly how the band intended it to be written. Just because it's not standard doesn't mean it's wrong, otherwise Limp Bizkit would be moved to Limp Biscuit. The article name has to have the first letter capitalised because that's how the software is built (would be awesome if that could be changed) but other than that it should be aMotion. Danikat (talk) 11:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: * http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/a-perfect-circle-remix-album-due-in-november/ - Appears to be its first announcement. Sergecross73 msg me 13:14, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Template talk:BuddhismOpenTask

message: I added a "newly added" section to highlight new articles that have been written about subjects of interest to us.  These are Open Tasks, because they require other users to take a look at them and check for accuracy.  My idea is that an article can stay on "newly added" for a week or two, and then move on to one of the other categories if necessary. - Nat Krause 04:47, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: What is the crossreferences list intended for?  ‣ᓛᖁ[ ᑐ] 01:53, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossreferences
Category talk:Conventions (meetings)

message: I added :category:magic conventions but :category:juggling conventions and :category:political conventions may be necessary too since there are multiple cons of both categories listed in the main list. Also, :category:conspiracy conventions which can include UFO conventions (like the MUFON Syposium) and many others. -Eερ² (t|c) 01:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  subcats
Talk:America's Sweetheart (Courtney Love album)

message: I read that she's working on a new album. The first song listed is called "How Dirty Girls Get Clean". I also read that she hasn't started recording yet but she wrote the songs so far. So I place the next album information as "How Dirty Girls Get Clean". If anyone has any information on this album please reply to this post and fix the infobox. Abstract Shadows 11:48, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Album 

message: Does anyone know where this interview was published? 77.103.19.147 (talk) 10:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for the source of the September 2006 interview quoted in this article
Category talk:Royalty of the Hawaiian Kingdom

message: http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Hawaii/hawaii9.htm gives a different picture of the House of Kawananakoa than your articles.
For example the Wikipedia says that Prince Edward David was Princess Abagail's husband, but Royal Ark says that he was her brother; Royal Ark says that he lived until 1953, while Wikipedia says that he died in 1908.
The two flatly contradict one another; whom to believe?
that Abigail's husband was David. Not any sort of Edward. Another Abigail was her daughter, and sister of Edward David. Waimea 00:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bill Nye

message: I don't usually make edits to wikipedia so correct me if i'm wrong but isn't it odd to put something like this as the second paragraph?
Born in Washington, D.C., Nye began his career as a mechanical engineer for Boeing in Seattle, where he invented a hydraulic resonance suppressor tube used on 747 airplanes. 2600:1700:A6B0:6EFF:BD28:C7E3:245C:E23D (talk) 09:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @2600:1700:A6B0:6EFF:BD28:C7E3:245C:E23D I personally think it's fine; the information is true and biographical. None of the words used are WP:WORDSTOWATCH. JacobTheRox (talk) 07:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like a Resume? 

message: Grammatical error Caca1327 (talk) 15:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. You need to specify what the error is.  RudolfRed (talk) 17:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 December 2023 

message: *https://www.beaumontenterprise.com/lifestyle/slideshow/The-pioneering-life-of-Bill-Nye-from-science-197398.php
*"He stayed at Boeing for nine years, through 1986, during which time he invented an airplane part called a hydraulic pressure resonance suppressor tube. The tube— sometimes called a ripple dampener—is a part of 747 jet airliner that dampens noise and pulsations." Oct 30, 2019
2601:646:201:57F0:8D7A:CDA3:E1B5:8B5F (talk) 09:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: he has a daughter? Charity Nye?
Article says he doesn't have children. 2001:1C01:3200:BB00:4D69:9999:9C7E:9220 (talk) 22:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daughter