Talk:Yellow-headed amazon

message: I personally would leave the latin names in, in parentheses so it is clear for non-native english speakers who do not know the common names, which species is intended. KimvdLinde 20:05, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, and thanks for the corrections.  —JerryFriedman 21:05, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Latin names

message: It looks to me like these are two different birds (Different genuses)? The amazona group gets divided different ways, but it is clearly a different bird than the diopsittaca. I'm suspicious that the "Double Yellow Head Amazon Breeders" link is really for the amazona.Lisamh 10:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: I don't know which legislation they are referring to when saying that "owning double yellow-heads is illegal", but that is not true in a number of places; here in Denmark, as long as the birds are captive-bred, you can keep a flock of 5000, if you so desire. I'll remove or alter that statement if no clarification comes within 48 hours.--Complainer 22:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just checked on the CITES website.   Amazona ochrocephala oratrix is on Appendix I list of CITES, which by international treaty, has made export, import and trade of wild-caught Yellow-headed Parrots illegal and the trade in birds bred in aviculture closely controlled.  Generally throughout the world sale of Appendix list I species bred in aviculture must be accompanied with official certification and is subject to checks and regulations. Snowman 22:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: The classification of Amazon parrots with yellow heads is more difficult that I first thought.  All Amazon parrots that are not on CITES list I are on CITES list II.  I think it says that if a parrot can be confused with another parrot species then they are both included on a list.  I think that this probably means that the Yellow-headed Parrot is on list I. If I am wrong and it is on list II please make the corrections. Snowman 23:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it is illegal to import, own and trade a wild-caught Amazona ochrocephala specimen (importing a wild parrot is illegal no matter what, even if it is a pest species like, say, A. farinosa), and there is a bit of paperwork to be done if you purchase a captive-bred one (here they must have a ring and the breeder must give you a lot of papers), but that doesn't detract from the fact that this species is owned legally by thousands of people both in Europe and the USA. There is even a "race" of this species that was created (and only exists) in captivity. The current formulation of the article is extremely confusing; most people who own parrots, at least in Northern Europe, are sensitive to environmental issues, and would never do something that violates CITES rules.--Complainer 09:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: As should be obvious from above, double yellow-heads do breed in captivity (how would they establish an artificial variety otherwise?).--Complainer 13:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal aspects

message: See Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Aviculture.  The purpose of this project is to help increase the amount and quality of content related to aviculture on wikipedia, and to maintain and organise articles relating to the subject, eventually bringing as many as possible up to good- or featured-article status. Snowman 23:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aviculture WikiProject proposal 

message: I thought that the animated gif file of the yellow-headed parrot eating was a nice touch to the article. Why was it removed ? 216.78.39.5 23:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not the one who removed it, but I don't think it shows any more than the other pictures.  If people decide to keep it, it certainly needs a less childish caption, such as "Eating canteloupe".  But I think it would be better at Commons with the Commons tag in the article.  —JerryFriedman 21:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I think it's a nice contribution to the article.  I wish more articles were "interactive" like that. -- Rei 19:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

text: If it makes you feel better, the animated gif is still in the Spanish version of this article. 187.251.114.126 (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated Gif 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Yellow-headed amazon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060615122950/http://www.defenders.org/cites/yellowhead.pdf to http://www.defenders.org/cites/yellowhead.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Something should be added about the cock bird's displaying? He puffs up, puts his wings out, flares his tail, trills and growls, struts like a rooster and shows the world what a magnificent bird he is. I think this is a characteristic behavior of this species. 146.200.128.223 (talk) 08:44, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazon parrot male display 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Festive amazon which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 19:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress