lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Graphic communication

message: Graphic Communication is also thought as a FdA at the London School of Communications and at Kingston University I think
-- User:217.76.19.17 16 September 2007 13:25 (UTC)
:I think the term "Graphic communication" means a lot of things, starting with the ordinary meaning of "a type of communication with graphics" 
:The current article, see here, is still kind of based on the initial start of this article of 8 September 2007 by User:Daviewilson2007, who started with:
::Graphic communication is an optional subject studied in Scotland. It's main purposes is to introduce students to making architectural drawings - both manual and electronically. In addition to teaching DTP and manual publishing.
:This also explains all links to Scotland in the current article. 
:Now it is clear that this article started about a very specific meaning of graphical communication, while this term has a whole general meaning. And it a subject of study in almost every country and of numerous schools. I will:
:# rewrite this article starting with the general meaning, 
:# removing all specific links to Scotland. An article about the initial meaning should be called something like [[Graphical communication (study in scotland)]. However a subject like this will fail notability, and will not last in Wikipedia. 
:# I will move the whole article to Graphic communication, because of Wikipedia naming conventions
:-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 20:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic Communication is also thought as ... 

message: * In this edit text is copy/paste from the graphics, Communication, Visual communication, graphic design and Communication design article.
* In this edit text is copy/paste from the graphics article. 
-- Mdd (talk) 14:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-paste registration 

message: Am I the only one who finds it ironic that this article contains no diagrams? Vectro (talk) 22:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic Communication 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jamie.green-2 (talk) 18:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Communication
Talk:Tapping a Hero

message: Oh, my god.  That had to be the funniest thing I've heard on televison.  I loved the "BAWK BAWK [BLEEP] BAWK!  [BLEEP] BAWK [BLEEP]!!! tinlv7 13:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Law and Order: KFC

message: I reverted some vandalism of the first two skits, but I really don't understand why anyone would make up skits that are believable as part of the episode.  The fact that it hasn't been reverted before puzzles me.  Is there an alternate version of the episode of which I'm not aware?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grayoracle (talk • contribs) 06:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism?
Talk:Paul Panzer

message: Disambiguation, please. "Paul Panzer" is also the stage name of German comedian Dieter Tappert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.224.154.71 (talk) 22:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A link can be added to this article saying "For the German comedian who uses the stage name Paul Panzer, see Dieter Tappert", as and when the English article for Tappert is created. Lugnuts (talk) 09:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dieter Tappert
Talk:Utility submeter

message: This article needs much more about the history and social aspects.  In the US, my understanding is that traditionally apartment landlords have been required by law and regulation to provide acceptable levels of various services, including heat and water.  These costs were thus required to be included in the basic rent agreement, and could not be billed as additional variable items, because that might lead to tenants living without adequate life essentials.  So, there is a conflict here, between conservation/efficiency and other community social goals.  How has this played out in various areas of the US?  What is the history and current situation in other parts of the world?  What ways of resolving the conflict have been proposed or tried?-69.87.204.233 13:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prohibition of submetering in residential apartments
Talk:Gerardo Huber

message: Does anyone have information on his date of birth? And the date he was declared deceased should be noted on the dates as well. I'll go through later today and clean up some of the grammar in the article. Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 15:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Header dates 

message: Article could be a B-class with a little more attention. Infobox, picture, birthdate, more bio info, etc. Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Supertall

message: I know that these discussions are not votes, but c. 8 keeps to c. 4 deletes is not delete, it is no consensus at best.  Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 13:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right they're not a vote. If the closing admin feels that the argument made for deletion is stronger than that made for keep regardless of the amount of editors on either side, they're free to delete it. The closing admin has noted that they felt there was policy directly addressing this article and its existence which those calling for keep failed to address.--Crossmr 14:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still, that big of a disparity (8-4?) shows that there was no consensus.  Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 15:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You forget the consensus that was formed in the creation of that policy which the article violates. 8 vs a majority of wikipedia users involved in the creation of that policy.--Crossmr 20:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing is a majority of those who participated in the discussion interpreted the policies in such a manner as to not see any violations.  Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 20:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion review request
Talk:List of diplomatic missions in Lithuania

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 23:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article 
Talk:Myristoleic acid

message: Myristicaceae ends in -aceae, so it seems to be a family not a genus.--Miguelferig (talk) 21:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Genus/Family

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Myristol. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 21#Myristol until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Mdewman6 (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Myristol" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Don Hany

message: * He plays the main character in the survival documentary titled Miracles: Miracle in the desert. Can somebody please add it to the main page? I don't want to add it, because not having an account, it would be full of all my details after the added line and it doesn't look good. 115.70.85.100 (talk) 04:46, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Footnote 1 link connects to a site that doesn't have anything at all to do with Don Hany.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.214.129.195 (talk) 11:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Dani Sánchez

message: It strikes me as quite possible that this article should really be Daniel Sánchez (billiards player), since I see Sanchez with the diacritic fairly often.  Anyone got any certain sources? — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 09:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is Sánchez, according to his own official web site. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 09:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name spelling 

message: I wonder why the high run and game average were removed from the article? 124.106.203.252 10:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a cut-paste accident on my part. I restored (and improved) the missing content.  Thanks for flagging the error! — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 11:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feats
Talk:Live scan

message: The final sentence makes no sense: "New offering to obsolete current product package is to be expected." What is a "new offering"? What is an "obsolete current product package", who is expecting it and why is this even written here? Promontoriumispromontorium (talk) 18:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense
Talk:Joseph Henry Press

message: This ‘article’ is simply a verbatim copy taken from the web page of John Henry Press.  Thus the assertions of the goals JHP have no real basis.  Perhaps this should be replaced with a simpler statement, and then a direct link to the home page quoted here. 
Dick-F 14:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Water as fuel

message: The problem here is that it is not clear what Kanzius is claiming.
Is he or is he not claiming that he gets more energy out than the RF input?
If yes:  then it appears a water as fuel proposal
If no: then he is apparently claming a highly efficient method of producing hydrogen.
Which is it?
Kaznius himself is not making any public comments, he does not even have a web site.  The statements reported and attributed to him have been contradictory.
Meanwhile, his strongest supporter so far, Dr. Rustum Roy, states (as of 13th Sept 2007):
"He has not made any attempt as far as we know to obtain the data regarding the energy balance between input and output."  http://www.rustumroy.com/response_to_email.htm
The problem here is complete absence of data on the input and output energy numbers for the process. It is puzzling as to why this is being kept so secret..... I can understand secrecy about HOW it is done, but secrecy as to WHAT has been done makes no sense. Charles 14:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dr Roy is now 85 years old - since retirement as a chemist 20 years ago, he's "lost it" - he's taken up bizarre eastern religions and started working on magnetic whole body healing and all sorts of other bullshit pseudo-science.  I've spoken to one of his ex-colleagues (via email) and he believes that Dr Roy is no longer to be considered a creditable source.  To put it bluntly Kanzius' "strongest supporter" is suffering the consequences of senility.  Sadly, Dr Roy's credentials as "A Scientist at Cornell" and "An established chemist with a strong reputation" are trotted out at every Kinzler press briefing - and journalists  too often swallow things like that without checking them.  SteveBaker 10:39, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's pretty funny though. Roy even stated himself (http://www.rustumroy.com/response_to_email.htm) that Kanzius did not prove that he got more energy out than in. — NRen2k5 17:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John Kanzius]]
Talk:Peyton

message: I think Peyton Fahrquhar, the character from the short story "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" by Ambrose Bierce should be added to the "Characters in Fiction" list, but I don't know if he's well-known enough to bother with  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.203.60.134 (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Peytons 

message: Have I missed something? but there are no double barrel names here.
for example a search for "Peyton-Jones" comes up with three.
john f212.183.128.214 (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peyton-Jones
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Justine Ezarik

message: Keep - I think she is a legitimate child of the INTERNET. 
Her wide-spread popularity is a good example of what the free world of information can do. 
I don’t see why we are starting to sound like the FCC. 
Please lets keep wikipedia open minded
72.90.220.217 14:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Palenville, New York

message: Someone should add something about the town's founding. I remember watching something when I was really young about it. Unfortunately, I can't add much to the article because all I remember is that it had something to do with a guy whose last name was Palen and that airplanes may have been involved somehow. 153.42.168.174 15:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If this is an article about the Palenville Interarts Colony, then it should be Palenville Interarts Colony.  Since there is apparently a great deal to be said about the Colony (in fact, more than about the town surrounding it, it seems), the Colony should have its own page and the town's page should link to it. (Note:  the bulk of the article deals with the history of the Colony, reads like a press release issued by the Colony, and was added in one fell swoop by an unnamed editor at 68.198.94.232.  I have a serious problem with this sort of thing -- I call it "wikijacking" -- but I'd like consensus before I take action.)
--7Kim (talk) 13:07, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this article about? 

message: I removed a few people from this section because they do not have their own Wikipedia articles which is required to establish notability per Wikipedia. The information I removed is: Michael Billera, performance artist, lyricist, member of The Warm Jets, Aunt Wayne, Spincycle Lava, Brian Goss, musician; Dripping Goss, others, Dripping Goss musical band, Robert Goss, founder of American Gothic Records, musician; member of The Warm Jets, Crippled & The Burnout, George H. Hall, artist and  Darrell Whitbeck, artist and musician. Thanks--BuzyBody (talk) 18:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people section
Talk:Scleroderma citrinum

message: The article says "Earth Balls are superficially similar to, and considered look-alikes of the edible Puff Balls, but whereas the Puff Ball has a single opening on top through which the spores are dispersed...."  The second part of that sentence seems to treat "puff ball" as a single entity (reinforced by the capitalization of Puff Balls), but puffballs are a multi-order category of fungi, only some of which are edible. I'm not sure if the sentence means some specific puffball, like the giant puffball, or if it means puffballs in general, and that their superficial similarity only applies to the edible varieties of those puffballs. -Agyle 15:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Puff Balls"

message: In eastern Europe, young earthballs (Scleroderma citrinum) with a white gleba, are being used in *small* amounts as spice. The flavour is similar to truffle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.242.49 (talk) 21:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edibility

message: According to Rick Stein, certain unscrupulous restaurateurs in London peel common earth balls, slice them thinly, marinate them in truffle oil and pass them off as black truffle. Has anyone else heard of this practice? 124.170.252.20 (talk) 07:09, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of common earth ball as erzatz truffle 
Talk:Polar (satellite)

message: polar satalite is butiful light  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.237.211.222 (talk) 06:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  buti 
Talk:Phenomenology (psychology)

message: Does Carl Rogers use the word "phenomenology"? Has anyone used the word to apply to Carl Rogers' thought? DCDuring 15:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is there anything of substance in this article?

message: This article is in its beginning/initial stages. It has some fundamental information about phenomenology but lacks any structure or organization. For example, the "Difficulties in considering subjective phenomena" could be split up into different sub-sections. The title of the section would be better worded as "Criticisms of Subjective Phenomena".
There are two great starting places to work on completing this article. One of them being the Lead. It is well-written; however, it lacks a description of what to expect from the article as a whole. What is the purpose? What are the major article sections? 
The next best course of action is to find more reputable and quality sources. This will enhance the content and provide better knowledge of what sections to add. Aheuer15 (talk) 06:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Structure to the Article 

message: should that be words?... ELSchissel (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you are referring to its usage in the first paragraph. I agree and have changed it. "spoken word" or "written word" can be a collective noun phrase that in American English would not be plural. (See the spoken word article where it is never pluralized.) But in this case it is an individual's communications and so not really collective. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  written or spoken word
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Denise Milani

message: It is not about notability, it is not about policy, it is not even about reason. It is about whether or not the clique likes it. That is the only criteria for inclusion that actually matters. 133.48.61.207 (talk) 08:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This is why WP is a failure

message: The deletion of the Denise Milani Article is the grestest injustice man has ever known.--76.173.255.40 (talk) 09:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HERESY!
Talk:Green Bay Packers Foundation

message: This article really has no point in standing separately. Most teams have charitable foundations and none are notable enough to warrant a separate article. Therefore, this paragraph should probably be merged into Green Bay Packers. Pats1 T/C 21:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The only reason I knew this was here was because the main Packers article listed the foundation as being the team's owner. It's better listed in the main article.DrBear 18:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on current sources, it is now a notable charity. I have created the article. Cheers,  « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  20:40, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:List of films set in Tampa

message: The setting of a movie and the filming location of a movie are two different concepts. Though quite often the setting of a movie is the same as the filming location (that is, the movie is actually filmed where it is supposed to take place,) for various reasons (usually budget) a production company may use one location as a stand-in for another location. For instance, someone put Lethal Weapon 3 on this list because parts of it were filmed in the Tampa area, however in these scenes the Tampa area was being used as a stand-in for the Los Angeles area, so I took Lethal Weapon 3 off the list. In order for a film to qualify as being set in Tampa, Tampa must be the setting for the story. Please make sure at least part of the actual story of a movie takes place in Tampa before including it in this list. Thank you. Mmyers1976 (talk) 20:35, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reminder that this is films SET in Tampa, not FILMED in Tampa
Talk:Blisk

message: I added links to other pages. Is it still orphaned? --Belugaperson 15:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphaned
Talk:San Juanico Bridge

message: Kasaysayan
Noong kalagitnaan ng 1960's nag desisyon ang administrasyong Marcos na itayo ang San Juanico Bridge (aka "Marcos Bridge") sa ibabaw ng San Juanico Strait galing Brgy. Cabalawan, Tacloban City, Leyte 10km galing sa city proper (kapital ng Leyte) papuntang Sta. Rita Municipality, Kanlurang Samar, 96 km galing Catbalogan (Kapital Samar). 
Noong 1968 ang Construction at Development Corporation of the Philippines ay naparangalan ng kontrata sa pagdesenyo at pagtostos sa pagtayo ng napakalaking proyekto. Ang CDCP's Design & Engineering Staff kasama ng mga Hapong inhinyero ay nagsagawa ng pag-aaral at pagsasaliksik at sinimulang itayo ang nasabing tulay hanggan matapos noong 1973.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.247.42 (talk) 01:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am looking for a reliable source to say what type of bridge that the San Juanico bridge is. It has been identified in the article as an arch, but I think that it may be a truss where the top chord is on a smooth grade and the bottom chord varies the depth of the truss. This would give the bottom an appearance of an arch.  The truss action comes because there are diagonal members between the bottom chord and the top chord. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 05:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge type 

message: This might have some info to add to the article. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible ref 

message: Had to revert fairly obvious (to Filipinos) vandalism on this page.  Come on: Juanito Isko Balunbalunan and Rodolfo Tokneneng Jr.? The names added since October 2009 by several IP / unregistered users are all unverifiable. Ronaldo Guevara (talk) 09:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: The article states that one can now travel by land from Manila to Mindanao. Google maps shows two ferry legs in this journey.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.150.151 (talk) 13:50, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Travel by road 

message: Philipino 2001:4455:20D:7000:61FF:6177:BCD2:BBB3 (talk) 12:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Juanico Bride location