lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Altern-8

message: The Nexus 21 article does not show any evidence of standalone notability so it is suggested that it be merged here where it is already mentioned. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 16:54, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Nexus 21]] 

message: Much as I would love for it to be true (and I would buy a ticket), I can't find any sources which say that Archer and Peat ever reunited. The article appears to be selling an illusion that Altern-8 the duo still exist. If in fact they did reunite, can somebody please add reliable sources which prove it?  --kingboyk (talk) 05:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archer and Peat reunion 

message: Mark Archer released music under the name DJ Nex. He was also a founding member of Bizarre Inc.  Neither is mentioned here and there is no separate page for Mark (Wikipedia redirects to the altern8 listing). Also this article says "in 1993 Mark Archer began producing music" referring to a slo moshun release which is obviously incorrect as he'd released music as DJ Nex prior to that.
Think that Mark deserves his own Wikipedia page and/or this page needs updating 2.25.248.133 (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  DJ Nex
Talk:Google Trends

message: The redirect Google Zeitgeist has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 10:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Google Zeitgeist]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: For me, the chapter “Background” seems to be a little too long. It should be discussed, if it could be shortened. 2A01:599:809:E319:5E9:C7A1:B588:3549 (talk) 16:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than providing a list of publications by specific authors, which could be included in a separate chapter on potential areas of application, it would be more beneficial to discuss the methods of data collection, the differentiation between search terms and search topics in Google Trends, the limitations of the methodology, and current possibilities for standardisation and comparability. 2A01:599:844:A7CD:87F:B3C3:5DD1:5ABC (talk) 12:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Background” chapter
Talk:Bogense

message: I don't know the correct figure, but I really doubt that there's .424 of a person wandering around in Bogense. Though I could be wrong on that, I have been wrong before. Kaitwospirit 21:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 May 11

message: Please add Iran-Iraq UFO Sightings I am too dumb today to add it myself. Maybe the how-to for deletion could be improved, too, since there might be other idiotic editors like me who end up with a page where they add something that looks like what all the other articles have but it simply won't work. Añoranza 16:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Aquariums of Pyongyang

message: The article requires some objective reviews.
A meeting with Bush, Presidential Torturer-in-Chief, does not qualify as a recommendation.
Varlaam (talk) 00:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added two. Yes, that is ironic! Ghostofnemo (talk) 01:36, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical reaction

message: Did Yair Reiner also do the English translation? My English language copy has him credited as the translator, but I'm not sure if he is being credited as the original translator (Korean to French) or the English translator. Ghostofnemo (talk) 01:16, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Book review names him as the English translator, not the French translator. Ghostofnemo (talk) 01:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  English translator? 
Talk:Celia Lovsky

message: A list of all of Ms. Lovsky's film and television roles would be appropriate. --Bluejay Young 16:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Film & TV Appearances

message: We really need to get a picture of Ms. Lovsky up there. Preferably from her younger, glamorous days. --Bluejay Young (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I removed this stray sentence fragment from the end of the first paragraph of her biography.  If anyone can figure out where it goes - it makes no sense to me - they are welcome to put it where it should go.  But it definitely didn't go where it was; it clearly has nothing to do with she and Peter Lorre being friends for the rest of his life.
"Adventures of Jim Bowie(1956) Played Mother of Cajun Son; (Season 1, episode 4)."
2601:645:C300:3950:E982:64F0:DF7:BA1C (talk) 10:32, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stray sentence fragment
Talk:Gabriel Hanot

message: Is this still a stub?  Franchecomté 16:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bill Lowery (politician)

message: Nothing definitive yet -- but it bears watching.  See LA Times article on it. -- Sholom 16:35, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being investigated in connection with Cunningham Scandal 
Talk:The Ocean Race

message: I'm not sure about the merits of merging all the standalone race articles into this main page. The main page is already quite long and we don't want it to become unwieldy. I think it would have been preferable to keep the race articles and expand them. Mattlore (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I don't see the reason. /Smartskaft (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

text: +1 Wild8oar (talk) 19:54, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll be bold and unmerge them. I welcome further discussion here. Mattlore (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of race articles

message: Does it fall into fleet or match race category?213.149.62.88 (talk) 18:42, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  race type 

message: Volvo is no longer the name sponsor, and from 14 Feb 2019 the race is called The Ocean Race. I think the name of this page should change, as it did when Volvo took over from Whitbread. Or should a new page be created for the Ocean Race with links back to the Volvo Ocean Race main page?https://www.theoceanrace.com/en/news/12219_Welcome-to-The-Ocean-Race.htmlMaz at volvooceanrace (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I would just rename the page. I think there is automatically a redirect from the old name (Volvo Ocean Race) to the new page. Wild8oar (talk) 11:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change event name 

message: Is there a source that actually states fresh food is not permitted after the start of the race? Of the two sources used, one (the video) makes no mention of it while the other (the Wired article) merely says they eat freeze-dried food, which is not the same thing as saying fresh food is banned. Given the fact the article states "too much food will add unwanted weight to the boat," it reads more like the use of freeze-dried food is a strategy enacted by the boat(s), not a rule set by the race organizers. 104.184.182.119 (talk) 08:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Fresh Food (lead)
Talk:Michelle Dewberry

message: Photo request seems to have been fulfilled. TheGrappler 04:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should there be a mention in the article that she suffers from endometriosis? --Athcnv 19:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to endometriosis? 

message: She may be a businesswoman but this article gives no evidence that she has done any business at all. Cooke (talk) 19:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Businesswoman"

message: She didn’t give away the prize money, it had to be nominated to a charity of her choice. 92.18.100.160 (talk) 20:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Chase  

message: It seems like everyone wants to make stupid and self centred hurtful remarks, but she is a beautiful and elegant, talented woman, who has a mesmerising smile that warms my heart,and has done some amazing things in her career so before you judge and try to break someone’s spirit, why don’t you take a look at your own depressing life and try to make a change instead, D 2A00:23EE:2058:3703:111E:4020:86A1:6D34 (talk) 12:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfection
Talk:Death in Singapore

message: "When a person dies in a house, the death must be notified to the authorities within 24 hours by the occupier of the house in which to his or her knowledge the death took place, the relatives of the deceased present at his or her death or in attendance during the last illness of the deceased, or each person present at the death. If those persons fail to do so, another inmate of the house or the person causing the body of the deceased person to be buried." This sentence should be copyedited. HYH.124 (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs copyediting 
Talk:The Voice of Frank Sinatra

message: Whether he and Axel Stordahl were specifically asked to record the songs included in the album - interestingly we now always say ‘on the album’ - or whether they were just collected together from the two recording sessions has been lost in the mists of time. If it had been the intention to release the album why did they wait over four months to record the second set? There were five other recording sessions between July 30 and December 7. The July session took place in Hollywood from 8 in the evening until 11.30 (you couldn’t record songs like this during the day) and is arguably the single best four-song session of the 1940s (quite why they didn’t stick to Hollywood for the second set is difficult to understand). Everything at the first session is perfect. It’s as though Frank Sinatra is living every moment of those songs, you ‘feel’ the emotion. The ‘sound’ of the studio adds to the atmosphere, the arrangements - all eight songs were done by Axel Stordahl - and the playing of the studio orchestra is flawless. Gareth E Kegg 11:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taken from the article, could we tidy and put this back in? 

message: if only five of the songs from the original 10" are on the 12"lp, where did the other seven songs come from? how were they originally released? and were the three leftover songs therefor reissued on a different 12"lp? it would be useful to add these details. 
what about the other Columbia 10"lps? did they also get reconfigured as 12"lps? if so, there's no info about them on the remaining Columbia 10" pages. I do know the first two Capitol 10"lps got squished together as one 16track 12"lp 
I like how the Sinatra discography is presented in Wikipedia according to its original release format, it definitely makes more sense that way. But the 10"lps did go out of print after 1956 or so and the 12"lps lasted for another 40 years, and are therefor much easier to find. It would therefor be useful to also factor in detailed info as to how these early Columbia tracks were reconfigured for the more longlasting 12"lp format, maybe just a paragraph at the end of each page saying "these five tracks ended up on Compilation A, the other three on Compilation B".
J Edward Malone (talk) 02:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Voice 12"lp
Talk:El cóndor pasa (zarzuela)

message: I would agree in principle, but the two are close enough anyway that we really need at least greater context on the song as such to justify a split of the content.--Pharos 01:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the length of the article, I can't see that a split is justified.  If the material on the play and/or on the song were siginifcantly expanded, then perhaps. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 19:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The play is pretty much extinct by now, not many people have heard of it and almost nobody associates the name with anything other than the song, splitting the article would cause the information about the play to dissapear. Hdezela 15:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh, no! How could you??? Splitting up this already tiny article in two mini-mini stubs makes absolutely no sense! (Besides, the first attempt was really sloppy, leaving the two articles absolutely unconnected and giving no background information about the song's history.) Most people will search for the song and find its roots interesting. Please revert the split ASAP! --FordPrefect42 22:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Shouldn't this melody have an original Quichua or some other indigenous name? Or is the SPanish name the original title?--Sonjaaa 01:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: not too commercially important at the time(1913), and still now--Andersmusician VOTE 05:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The question was raised before the split of the article. The original name of the play is certainly "El Cóndor Pasa" in Spanish. --FordPrefect42 12:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish name?

message: While the addition of extra material is very welcome, the manner in which it was done was very problematic. The editor completely over-wrote the existing article, removing all formatting, valid references, categories, etc. I have edited this extensively to repair the serious format problems and to restore the missing references and categories. However, the article still needs extensive copyediting for grammar, punctuation, and encyclopedic style and tone. Also, none of the new material added has any references. This also needs to be rectified, especially since various possibly contentious claims are made. I have tagged the article for these two issues. Voceditenore (talk) 10:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits (December 2014) 

message: I have replaced "Mr. Mc. King" with simply "Mr. King". "Mc." (wth a lower case "c") is meaningless in English and confusing to the reader. I don't know why the republished libretto (linked by another editor) has this. It may may be based on a scanning error from 1913 copy. The only viable possibilities are "M. C. King", "McKing", or possibly "Mac King". If "Mc." refers to a first name, then it is unnecessary to add it and given its obvious error, misleading. Voceditenore (talk) 07:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mr. Mc. King"
Talk:Oral mucocele

message: At the very least, the introduction, which presently is a mass of technical terms, ought to be comprehensible to a nonspecialist.  (That is true of many WP articles.)  Who can fix it?  I have other things to do and I don't know what half those words mean.  I'm a nonspecialist (that means my specialty is not medical).  Zaslav (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Whole article needs rewriting. 94.196.232.219 (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about writing in readable English? 

message: Whilst I appreciate that the article does have some illustrations, I am hoping we may be able to add better cross-section diagrams in the future, showing the structure of these lumps, and the layers involved.-71.174.186.236 (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps some old circa-1900 pre-copyright medical science illustrations would be accurate enough to be useful to include.-71.174.186.236 (talk) 21:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  cross-section diagrams
Talk:Spider Widow

message: No, You're ALL  wrong, and dc comics bought those things fair.
* First of all, it wouldn't hurt you to sign the bloody thing properly. Second of all, the copyright status of quality comics has been discussed here  and here and supported by a chart here--Strannik 22:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Belated note: That last link is dead and does not seem to be archived. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spider Widow Copyright Status
Talk:Al St. John

message: The image of Al St. John was deleted by Wikipedia, I just removed the dead link.
Cokerwr 17:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Cokerwr. I still see the image on Wikipedia. If you open the version of the article previous to your last edit, it is still there. I've had trouble with Wiki's images over the last few days-- sometimes none of them will display. Perhaps this is what happened? Anyway, I'll revert the link to the image, since it seems to have been deleted due to some sort of misunderstanding. Rizzleboffin 17:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Wonder why this article is entitled "Alfred St. John" instead of "Al St. John."  I don't believe he was ever billed as "Alfred," based on seeing dozens of his films at the Museum of Modern Art's Roscoe Arbuckle retrospective several years ago, although I might be wrong about this, since it's been a while (but I don't think so).  Wastetimer (talk) 03:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I absolutely agree.  St. John made nearly 350 movies without once being billed as "Alfred St. John."  As the WP guidelines for moving an article (WP:Moving an article) don't require consensus, I'll make the change soon.  Anyone opposed, speak up quickly! Monkeyzpop (talk) 07:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alfred St. John?

message: At footnote 3, the census reference includes the location “Pamona City,” which I am fairly sure should have been Pomona. Having no immediate access to the census records, I suppose it’s possible that the error exists in the original record or the LDS transcription. But error it is, since there is no “Pamona” in California (the hyperlink goes faithfully to an entry for the Pamona language). 2601:645:102:C6E0:D159:9F8E:DDB2:4281 (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pamona or Pomona?
Talk:The Jim Rome Show/Archive 1

message: This page was 17 pages when i printed it out. I think we should split it up into seperate articles.
-- Doc Strange 09:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the majority of Wikipedians who do what is best for the site would agree with my point of view. The only reason you wanted to keep it the old way was because you're a fan of the show. Hell, I'm a fan too. I'm one of the infamous "monkeys" and I love the show. But the Wiki was just way too detailed. Just because Stern & SNL's articles are longer doesn't mean it's okay for this one to be that long. It goes back to the old adage...if everyone else is jumping off a bridge, would you do it too? --Zpb52 06:52, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

message: The above is a best guess at reconstructing the Talk page discussions repeatedly blanked by . Destroying the talk page is viewed as vandalism. It removes useful informatiom about an article's history; please don't do it again. Tearlach 23:49, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Attempt to reconstruct Talk page

message: * I tried taking out the "Rome Hates-" and "Rome and-" and "Rome Loves" from all of the regular bits lines. It was looking a bit too repetitive, and really didn't need to be there. But if it was too much, it can be changed back without any problems.
Doctorindy 20:53, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rome Hates

message: Could be a pretty significant "topic" under e-mailers, it's spread into Wednesday's show already
...For dicsussion
As I try to recall the story....Tues 11/29/05, Mike T was commenting in an e-mail about Silk not having a job. Then Silk (or someone else?) e-mailed asking what Mike T does for a living, since it seems like he e-mails the show all afternoon, and doesn't seem to do any work. Travis (IIRC) counted up his e-mails for the day, and he had sent 28 up to that point in the show already. A few minutes later, Mike T has the guts to e-mail a rather unimpressive comeback e-mail saying he's an accountant. He explains that he has spare time during the day because he says: "I don't have to be perfect, if I make a mistake, the IRS will let me know." (exact quote uncertian). From that point on, the show turned upsidedown, as Rome and the rest of the e-mailers rediculed him, and he didn't get another e-mail in the rest of the day. Rome even mentioned something to the effect of Mike hurting his business if people find out that he doesn't seem to care about doing his work right.
I didn't put it in the main page yet, since I'm still sketchy about the exact details, but feel free to add more, or clarify. Doctorindy 18:08, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mike T in C-Town
Talk:Podesta (island)

message: This island does actually appear in Google Earth (at least in the current version) when turning on borders. It lies off the coast of Chile, about 1000 miles from Santiago. However, that does not prove that it isn't indeed a phantom island. Anyone who knows this for sure? If so, I guess Google Earth is wrong :) how embarrassing for them... Jonmagne 17:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appears in Google Earth 

message: This controverted "island" is still drawn by Chilean cartographic maps made by the Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service of the Chilean Navy [|"SHOA", Servicio Hidrográfico y Oceanográfico de la Armada], like charts numbered 14, 22 or 90(900) and still published by the Service.
Podestà also appears in the World Atlas of MS Encarta, but as an unnamed piece of emerged land in the middle of the south Pacific Ocean.
It is strongly recommended to ask the SHOA about this situation at this mail: [] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.246.90.12 (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It still appears on navigation charts
Talk:The Trashmen

message: The Trashmen are reuniting? More information on this, please! Korinkami 20:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Live?

message: As for their influence on popular culture, AllMusic has said that The A-Bones got their name from a song by The Trashmen, here:  --it would be really nice if someone would integrate it into the text. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 04:03, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular culture

message: At Universal Studios in Florida while riding a boat from the Royal Pacific, the boat captain told us that he had been part of a group and had the hit "Bird is the word".    He talked about all the names the group had over the years, and that he was still getting royalty checks for the song.   I believe his name was Bob.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.163.163 (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of the trashmen
Talk:Yelamu

message: This document dates the abandonment of these five villages to an attack of the Ssalson in 1776, and the relocation of the Yelamu survivors to the East Bay and Marin.  SaltyBoatr get wet 15:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  abandonment 
Talk:Jungle Jim

message: The intro for this article states that the Jungle Jim newspaper strip was set in Southeastern Asia, rather than the more commonly used jungle locale of Africa. I must admit that I've never seen samples of the strip itself or the subsequent comic books, or heard any episodes of the radio series, or seen so much as a clip of the 1937 Universal serial, but I grew up with the Johnny Weismuller movies and, to a lesser extent, his TV version. These were set in Africa. At the same time, Monogram made several Bomba, the Jungle Boy movies, relocating the property from the original pulp stories' Amazon jungle to Africa, because Monogram had much stock footage available (well, that's what a book on B-movies that I read a couple of decades ago said, identifying a specific film as the source of the footage, but I see in Bomba's Wiki article that the original pulp stories had already made the shift years earlier). Is this what happened here, or did any of the prior adaptations also "Africanize" the character? The article should reflect this shift, when and wherever it occurred. Ted Watson (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switch to Africa--when? 