lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stanley Hooker

message: There's an interesting video featuring Stanley Hooker talking about his engine work on YouTube here:   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Hooker video  

message: The chronology for Hooker's academic career is ambiguously worded and seems to provide at least one, possibly two, incorrect dates. I've got a date of 1932 for his move to Brasenose and one of 1936 for his doctorate. I can't attest to the accuracy of these dates but they seem to conform to overall times scale better than those provided in the article here.
Even if the dates are correct here, the ambiguity needs to be resolved, there's no mention of his Bachelor of Science degree and we're left infer the date for his move to Brasenose from his Busk award, that is incorrect. I suggest the following format: [scholarship/award and date: establishment: enrolment date: graduation/doctorate award date]87.112.60.171 (talk) 01:11, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The Oxford dictionary of national biography states the following: "From village schools and Borden grammar school a royal scholarship took him in 1926 to Imperial College, London, to read mathematics. He won the Busk studentship in aeronautics (1928) and the Armourers and Brasiers research fellowship (1930), and gained his DPhil at Brasenose College, Oxford, in 1935." His autobiography (Not much of an engineer) states. "In 1935 my period at Oxford was coming to an end. I had obtained a DPhil....." (page 21). "in September 1928 I was awarded the Busk studentship" (page 4).  "I went up to Imperial in 1926" (page 3) KreyszigB (talk) 17:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology for academic studies 

message: I believe Sir Stanley Hooker died in Bristol, England and not Bristol, USA. He retired and lived in Bristol, England. 82.14.146.60 (talk) 22:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passed away in Bristol, England
Talk:2004 Notre Dame Fighting Irish football team

message: Is anyone working on this page? I created Notre Dame Fighting Irish football under Tyrone Willingham which includes more information than this one. If anyone is working on this page feel free to use information from there, but if no one works on it I'm going to redirect it there. The College football WikiProject says that only past notable seasons should have articles (and all newer seasons) but if anyone can make this notable (it could be notable because of Ty's firing and it's easy to argue that) then please do and it doesn't need to be redirected. Any comments one way or the other? Phydend 02:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a discussion here that has died down since, but it was pretty much agreed upon that this should be redirected to the other article. Since there were no replies here I'm going to redirect the article. If someone wants to recreate it with something more than the schedule feel free to do so. Phydend 17:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?
Talk:Charles Cadogan, 1st Earl Cadogan

message: I have something inconsistent with the period as Master of the Mint - needs checking. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stanley Lane-Poole

message: Please be advised to check this out since some of the Wikipedia details concerning Stanley Lane Poole (1854–1931) are wrong. Sophia Lane Poole (1804–1894) was his (paternal) grandmother, not his mother. Edward William Lane (1801–1876) was his great-uncle, not his uncle. Richard James Lane (1800–1872) was also Stanley's great-uncle (the elder brother of Edward William Lane), not his uncle. Reginald Stuart Poole (1832–1895) was his uncle, not his brother. Stanley's brother was indeed Reginald Lane Poole (1857–1939). 79.180.88.51 (talk) 13:52, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Lane-Poole's family tree
Talk:Stanley Levison

message: Here's another source. Listen to what Alan Stang has to say on Levison being used by Moscow to distribute the "rubles" to pay locals for their communist activities:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXyfCQAOwfg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.226.93 (talk) 13:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the first paragraph of the preface of “parting the water” it states “Strictly speaking, this book is not a biography of Nartin Luther King, Jr., though he is at its heart.” 2601:481:0:B360:716A:DFC1:6F2D:536 (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And "liberal" is used as code for "communist".--Ralfdetlef (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction Parting the Waters is NOT biography of Dr. King
Talk:Xuân Lộc district

message: Half of this article about a district talks about a small Catholic parish (this district has several).  Perhaps it would be better to put that information in Roman Catholic Diocese of Xuan Loc. DHN (talk) 21:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight 
Talk:Stanley Porteus

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by  suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the  Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 16:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to Human Intelligence
Talk:SSV Normandy

message: Is the correct term "The SR1 Normandy?" Because I was told (click the citation, open the fifth column) that the Normandy has the letters SSV on the side, and that those letters stand for "Systems (Alliance) Space Vehicle."
Could the correct term be "The SSV Normandy?"
 --Asklepios 02:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, well, I found a page on the official Mass Effect website where the Normandy is referred to as the SS Normandy, so I'm going to ahead and change it to that. It still might be wrong, but it's all I've found.  --Asklepios 23:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just confused. I don't see any other mention of an SS Normandy, so I'm beginning to believe it's SSV. However, it is not SR1.  SR1 is the Normandy's hull classification symbol. --Asklepios 20:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From what it says here, http://masseffect.bioware.com/forums/viewtopic.html?topic=579076&forum=104&sp=15, it would seem it is the SSV Normandy, and SR-1 is a serial number-esque type number, meaning that it would still remain the SSV Normandy. i.e. you don't call your Xbox 360 a >serial number< 360 you call it an Xbox 360. 59.154.24.147 08:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention that it's reffered to (at least once; I'm only seven hours in) as "the SSV Normandy" in-game. -Madbrood (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Stanton A. Coblentz

message: This article lacks inline citations, and presents only a few facts about the author. There is a posthumous autobiography, which could provide more information about the article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I think we should use the term writer. This is the term we have chosen to use in category names. It makes sense to use it in the text of article as well.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writer v author
Talk:Starr Kempf

message: This section is so obviously written by some biased party, and is so non-pertinent to the life and legacy of the artist, that I am deleting it. And a note to whoever added it: if you are truly concerned about the legacy this man (who is clearly your relative), I would advise helping to create a proper page that helps people learn about the man and his work, rather than promoting your own personal biases and propaganda. alaroz33 (talk) 06:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting the "Zoning Controversy" section
Talk:Stasys Girėnas

message: Why so strange place of born?
He was born in Vitogala, Rossienskiy uezd, Kovenskaya guberniya, Russian Empire  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.100.95.142 (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lithuania in 1893?
Talk:K-K-K-Katy

message: -What other modern album...?
This song was also included on some other modern (70s?) album, sung by a couple of/few kids... not sure if the track was even credited on the album.  Can't remember what it was; does anyone know?  (Maybe Carly Simon?  Or who knows...?)  If anyone knows, pls. post to the main page.  (I'm "watching" this page, so I'll be auto-notified.)  Thanks!  philiptdotcom (talk) 03:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: old comments

message: I could not find the source for this quote, but "song OF success" makes sense. Can anyone find a source? jk (talk) 02:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Song Success" or "Song of Success"?
Talk:Štefan Banič

message: After a cursory look, I didn't find any really good sources to expand this, but he's definitely a real guy. Here's a mention of his accomplishment on the Library of Congress website, for example, just in case anyone gets deletion-happy. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: "it was the first parachute known to be actively used, saving the lives of many U.S. Air Force aviators during World War I."  Not true.  Besides the minor fact that during WWI, we did not have an Air Force (it was the Aviation Section, U.S. Signal Corps during WWI; it didn't become the US Air Force till 1947), it should be noted it is a well known fact that the US did not employ parachutes of any designs for its aviators in WWI.
A quick glance at the patent for this device should convince anyone that the US never would field such a device.
98.255.85.245 (talk) 23:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never Used by the US
Talk:Goodyear MPP

message: I think it might be worthwhile to discuss the ILLIAC IV here... Maury 02:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you want to discuss about the IV? They are quite different architectures. 143.232.210.150 (talk) 00:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? Both were parallel designs with limited bit width installed and used by NASA. Surely that commonality alone seems worthy of a mention? Maury (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Computing different NASA Centers and vastly different user communities.  The ILLIAC IV wasn't composed of bit-serial machines like the MPP.  The IV had floating point units, the MPP didn't.  The MPP was OK for discrete image processing. The IV sampled image processing but that community showed no further interest. The IV was ECL; the MPP was CMOS. I am sitting across the street from the wing of the building which housed the IV (but was not a user). The MPP had 1 programming language (a parallel Pascal), the IV had 1 language used of 3 (1 ALGOL-like, 1 home grown Fortran-like (CFD), and one home grown like neither of the aforementioned). A couple of books exist on the IV which touted it. The MPP's literature was fairly obscure even when it was replaced by Maspars.  The architecture which is closer to the MPP than any other might be the ICL DAP. The MPP had to have a redundancy which the ILLIAC IV never even approached since only 1 quadrant was completed. West Coast (IV, but from the Mid-West (IL)); East Coast (MPP, also from another part of the Mid-West (OH)). 143.232.210.45 (talk) 23:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[ILLIAC IV]]
Talk:The Gentle Art of Making Enemies

message: King_for_a_Day..._Fool_for_a_Lifetime  This album has a song with that title.  Anyone compared the book to the lyrics, to know if the song's actually based on the book? 74.196.181.80 (talk) 04:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media references to it?
Talk:Erik Moltke

message: Herewith citation was extracted from an email sent to nationalmuseet@natmus.dk The National Museum of Denmark on Monday August 27, 2007:  
To whomever it may concern
 
I inaugurated a cursory article on Erik Moltke on the English Wikipedia, refer:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Moltke  There is a dearth of information available on the Internet in English about this scholar who was an affiliate of your institution.  In addition, it would be welcome and appreciated if you could further progress the National Museum of Denmark article, refer:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Museum_of_Denmark.
 
I would appreciate a response to this email to confirm receipt and to be informed how and by whom it was actioned in due course.
 
Thanking you in anticipation
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 02:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request
Talk:Hymnus Eucharisticus

message: Note the boldfaced items below:
:…it is also sung from Magdalen Tower at 6am every 1 May, a tradition of more than 500 years.…
:The music is composed by Benjamin Rogers, "Doctor of Musique of the University of Oxon, 1685" and is entered on a folio bearing the date 1673 indicating that it may have been written prior to that date. The lyrics were alleged to have been written by Dr. Nathaniel Ingelo, to be sung "at the civic feast at Guildhall on the 5th July, 1660, while the king and the other royal personages were at dinner" however, the words of Ingelo's hymn differ significantly.[1]
While the tower is old enough for the tradition of singing a May morning hymn or two from its top to have been in place there for 500 years, if the Hymnus Eucharisticus only dates back to the latter half of the 1600s, it is not yet possible for the tradition of singing this hymn to have been in place there for 500 years; either the number of years needs to be revised in the light of the evidence, or the tradition needs to be dealt with in the Magdalen Tower article rather than here. imho --Haruo (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cannot be a 500-year tradition
Template talk:Best-selling video games

message: Since 'Main article', 'Computer and console' and 'Handheld' all link to the beginning of the same article, wouldn't it be better to list platforms/manufacturers?--Svetovid 02:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was non-intentionally ignorant editing on the part of User:Silver Edge. Also see Wikipedia: Article Size. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 00:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See also the above-named editor's clear misunderstanding of Wikipedia:Article Size, and User:Silver Edge and other's attempt to correct his clearly mistaken, although good faith, edits.  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 21:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pointless links

message: Why no lists for Sega consoles? 98.119.155.81 (talk) 05:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sega consoles
Talk:Jung Jae-sung

message: As with on the Lee Dong-keun (badminton) talk page, I am editing out a team event medal that the player did not participate in.  BKA records for the 2012 Thomas Cup finals show that Jung did not travel to China for the event and Badzine verified that with a telephone interview with the Korean Head Coach. Donaldinyongin (talk) 02:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012 Thomas Cup
Talk:Be Our Guest

message: My perfect pitch suggests that a voice-and-orchestra version I heard, likely but not certainly from the original film, begins in G major and modulates to C. Vocal scores published (even "official" ones) often are transposed from the original. As another example from a Disney film, A Whole New World is in D in the original, but in B-flat during the credits.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key 
Talk:Stella Goldschlag

message: The description of her biography unfortunately contains many false information. For example, the text states she never gave birth to a child, but she had a daughter, Yvonne. See http://www.aviva-berlin.de/aviva/Found.php?id=141669  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.114.239 (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong details in her vita 

message: is uncertain. The german WP guesses Freiburg im Breisgau --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Since that place of death was inserted in the same edit with the false information that claimed she didn't have any children, I think it's safe to ignore it. Freiburg is taken from the Aviva link above. This Google Book Search hit has Freiburg, while this one mentions that she lived in Berlin-Spandau until 1980 and moved "to a small rural town in southern Germany". The only source of doubt for me is this one, but since it also mentions that she betrayed her first husband (which is wrong on the timeline) I would not give it that much credit. --Flominator (talk) 08:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of death
Talk:Grabbag (song)

message: Does anyone have any detailed information both regarding other covers to this song as well as the artists and the most recent version that played during the teaser trailer that debuted the other day. I just feel there needs to be some sort of update considering Duke Nukem Forever seems to be back on track and coming soon, thank you - RVDDP2501 (talk) 16:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covers and update
Talk:Lee Yong-dae

message: does "Yongdaenese" redirect here? — LlywelynII 22:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Why
Talk:Hail, Hail, the Gang's All Here

message: From the article: "It appears that the lyric "Hail, hail, the gang's all here" had unofficially been added to Sullivan's melody many years before the publishing of the song. A Philadelphia Inquirer news item from April 1, 1898, for example, stated that during a raucous meeting of the Philadelphia Common Council, council members loudly sang, "Hail, hail, the gang's all here, what the h--- do we care! What the h--- do we care!"[1] Likewise, a Delaware state legislature session in March 1900 was disrupted when Democratic members loudly sang the song.[2] And these lyrics also appear in the closing measures of the 1915 song Alabama Jubilee."
There is nothing here which supports the claim that the lyrics had been added to the Sullivan melody before the song was published. There is evidence that the lyrics existed before the song was published, but no reference to the melody.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 19:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Danger! High Voltage

message: this was listed as indie rock
in what way is it indie rock? its a funky, hard rock song. just because the band is an indie band, doesnt make the song indie in any way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.26.25 (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: genre

message: This article claims Jack White sang the backing vocals on the track under the pseudonym John S. O'Leary.  The Electric Six general article gives far more detail about this - in this section it claims that his involvement was reported as fact but denied by the band.  This information should be reflected in this more specific article on the song itself I feel, and I'll move that section basically as is including citations into this article if there are no objections.
It'd also be great to get a definitive answer to the question of Jack White's involvement.  I can't find one that proves the matter one way or the other. CastorQuinn (talk) 02:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not about to argue the fact that both the band and Jack himself deny his backup vocals, but cmon' His voice is Brilliantly clear and indistinguishable. ref. my iPhone track #483 on shuffle BrownStarD (talk) 12:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What part does Jack sing? The "female" part? If not that, then who did, and who's the woman in the video? Wikiepedia's own article on Electric Six still denies it's him. Is there such a thing as an authoritative source? Did Jack ever admit it? DEFINITELY needs fixing! 188.29.165.110 (talk) 19:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Jack White's putative involvement

message: I'm wondering where the date of early 2003 for the initial release came from. The information on musicbrainz and grunnenrocks indicates sometime in 2002 for the initial release. While not conclusive in of itself it's also mentioned in the discription for some of the amazon listings (though not given as the release date). Does anyone have concrete evidence for any date? Also, it might be worth mentioning that "Danger! High Voltage" was actually released as a single by The Wildbunch before being released under the Electric Six moniker. Cheers. Zytsef (talk) 05:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date issues
Talk:Green Island Serenade

message: The article mentioned that there is no evidence that Teresa Teng had sung this song, but I found this on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oazYS3WGpdY
Can any native Taiwanese confirm if that's Teresa Teng?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.193.226.82 (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Buffalo Soldier (song)

message: ok while it's pretty clear that the two ditties are related, it's going to be tricky to prove due to not being able to interview the 'composer' and the fact that the composition was released posthumously. further, it could easily have been a subconscious thing and most importantly, what needs to be incorporated into this article somewhere, 'buffalo soldier' was POSSIBLY stolen from malawi performer, giddes/agidde/agide chalamanda, who MAY have been the one slightly influenced by the banana splits or happened to provide the inspiration for marley to bridge the two riffs, wittingly or otherwise. the banana splits version happens to fit in perfectly with marley's rhythm while agide provides the 'oys' in places of the 'las'. i'm only just looking into this now but so far i'm gathering that agide's song with the same name and basic chord progression is ALLEGEDY CLAIMED BY AGIDE to have been written 4 years prior to marley's (1974 vs 1978) but this is something yet to be proven too. 
NotPedanticReally (talk) 01:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  evidence
Talk:Atlantic Coast Football League

message: In case anyone's interested, here's a link to an ad for the Atlanta Spartans.
http://www.atlantatimemachine.com/misc/spartans.htm
4.249.186.197 02:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Some of these teams were apparently affiliated with NFL/AFL teams after they were already out of business!  Should there be a cleanup based on the years of affiliation listed?  Sorry, but guess I'm really just not all that bold. 75.200.29.34 (talk) 21:18, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies within article 