Talk:Nazi Moon base

message: I have added this article because I feel it is relevant in reference to the SS technology as well as the Nazi mysticism article - there is more to add, and I am digging up further information from research. I know there isn't enough background on such a subject but this is an idea that has been explored by many people directly associated in Nazi mysticism and conspiracy theories. Therefore, I feel it is necessary to at least have some defined information relating to this subject on Wikipedia. If people have any suggestions please feel free to add to this discussion, thanks. Piecraft 18:13, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I've cleaned it up, taken out the spurious references to NASA which are only included in this sort of hoax for "credibility by association," along with adding there's zero scientific or historical support for any of it. This sort of article is helpful only as entertainment and documentation of modern myth. Wyss 22:33, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't it be categorized as Pseudoscience instead of the current Protoscience?  Just wondering.  --Viriditas  | Talk 06:45, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. Personally I don't think it even qualifies as pseudoscience, but maybe protoscience is too generous as well. I think it should be myth and urban legend but that's only my opinion :) Wyss 12:58, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the cat to :Category:Pseudoscience due to claims made in the article by an alleged "scientist" by the name of Vladimir Terziski. --Viriditas  | Talk 05:37, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, I think that was helpful, since it puts this topic and Creation science in the same category ;) Wyss 14:13, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup

message: I think the M for moon should be capitalised. Not sure how to really dot his myself so if someone knows please feel free to change that.
*I agree, since this is obviously Earth's moon, it's only name is the Moon, and it happens to be a moon too, it should be changed.--4.232.222.105 21:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moon not moon 

message: Nice modern myth. Someone would wonder HOW nazi can lost second world war with such technology (whom allowed flying to Moon and Mars), but ah well. No one expect reason and any thinking at all from crackpots anyway. --80.51.70.116 11:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damn, it is so funny 

message: ...when is the "Gestapo on Mars" article coming? Looking forward to it : ) thepromenader 00:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey 

message: A book has been published in February 2010 by Joseph P. Farrell  that lays out a compelling argument that both the "Crashed Saucer" Army press release and the "Weather Balloon" Army press release that were issued immediately following the Roswell Incident of July 1947 were both opposite-poled dialectic pieces of disinformation to draw the public away from the real story which, at that time, would have been too horrific to contemplate: that the saucer that landed in the New Mexico desert was in fact a creation of Nazi technology -- people whom the public had assumed had been conquered in WWII. It is the opionion of the author that ex-patriated Nazi's were, and are today, carrying on advanced technology development. (Ask yourself why Kurt H. Debus  was put in charge of Cape Canaveral when he wasn't even a rocket scientist; he is the man who designed the power plant that fueled the Nazi Bell project.) The book is available at Amazon.com and from his publisher, .
We do need to keep this Wiki article active as Dr. Farrell and noted NASA conspiracy theorist, Richard C. Hoagland, are even now (year 2010) collaborating on the sequel to Hoagland's & Bara's book "Dark Mission." I do believe we will find explosive, convincing evidence supporting the idea that the Nazis are indeed implicated with a secret base on the Earth Moon, as well as implicated with the Mars Moon, Phobos. Photos and data retrieved in year 2010 by the European Space Agency now appear to strongly suggest that Phobos is indeed artificial, is largely hollow, is registering an internal air pressure and is leaking something into its atmosphere. See article at EnterpiseMission.com  . 
Mochamary (talk) 00:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research by Dr. Joseph P. Farrell