Talk:Vic Viper

message: Demand knowledge of what makes this article (or at least the "Weapons and Technology" section) applicable for OR/unverified claims. This is an article about something in a video game; most, if not all of the article's content can be found in the games themselves or their accompanying instruction manuals. Just because sources aren't cited (and to cite what, the game itself? Do I put a link to Gamestop's results page for a search of "Gradius"??) doesn't automatically deem the article full of original research. KSShaezer 17:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research? 

message: maybe the zoe part should have it's own article...--Dangerous-Boy 07:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ZOE 

message: :Image:Gokujo parodius characters.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Gokujo parodius characters.png

message: :Image:Vic viper fighter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Vic viper fighter.jpg

message: As the debate in the AfD page suggested, I am moving the discussion here.  I know of no good source for this article other than the one I mentioned there.  I have no idea where should this article merge to(the Gradius series aritcle?) or can anyone find some good source for this article to show its notability?  MythSearchertalk 12:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merge. The biggest problem is cutting it down to size.--ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to where? 

message: This article is called Vic Viper but there is nothing in the article about Vic Viper; the name isn't even mentioned in the main content, not even in the lead. Jodosma (talk) 12:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is vandalized, see history of main article for what I mean. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk  14:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad someone is aware of this. Jodosma (talk) 17:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who or what is Vic Viper