Talk:Cursillo

message: Since Cursillo also operates within the Anglican church under license, should the not be a mention of such in the main article? Geoff Riley 06:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglican Cursillo 

message: Speaking in support of the edits made by , who has identified his/herself as being from the National Cursillo Centre in Dallas, Cursillo is a Catholic movement, and as I said above it operates within the Anglican church under license.
It did not just spread to other Christian denominations, but rather the ideas behind Cursillo were taken and used by other denominations; there were initially a number of other organisations attempting to use the name 'Cursillo', but these were stopped by the fact that it is a registered trademark and, as far as I am aware, the only license has been issued to the Anglican church where the use is closely monitored to ensure that it is not misused or misrepresented. In the UK, where I am from, the British Anglish Cursillo Council oversees the administration of the license within the British diocese — and as diocesan roles change it is very important that no-one is allowed to 'have a good idea' that would interfer with the fundamentals of that license.
It would be useful if the NCC were to have a named account rather than an IP account, but as they have identified themselves, and the edits are in line with what I would expect of them I do not feel that there should be any dispute made of them. —Geoff Riley (talk) 19:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please cite your evidence regarding licensing, etc. Moreover, if the NCC is attempting to edit this page, that is an evident conflict of interest. Allens (talk) 12:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There have been several previous attempts by unregistered IP users to edit the article to remove content addressing non-Catholic versions of Cursillo.  Most of the IP addresses can be traced to Indiana.  NCC is located in Dallas and offhand I could not find anything to suggest that they have offices in Indiana.  While I can't rule out NCC involvement, this looks more like the work of an individual acting on their own.  mwalimu59 (talk) 15:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits by 75.19.179.55

message: This information was deleted that was germane to Cursillo and erased. As far as I know this is the only Cursillo-like retreat that there is. It was footnoted.
"A derivative retreat for Catholics is called "Christ Renews His Parish". It is a two-day retreat, normally Saturday and Sunday, and therefore does not qualify for the term "cursillo" meant to apply to a three-day retreat."
Evidently the editor mistook it for a listing of "just another retreat" or something. It isn't. It is unique and should gather no companions. Nor has it for the months that it has been here. Student7 (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cursillo-like retreat

message: Referenced material may be challenged on the basis of being accurate or inaccurate. But Cursillo does not own this page. It is about whatever information arises about Cursillo. As a result Cursillo-like retreats may be discussed or at least named.
Material is not WP:CENSORed in Wikipedia. Student7 (talk) 00:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see an argument for moving information about other three day movements that are not specifically called "Cursillo" to the three day movement article. Allens (talk) 12:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As mentioned above, there is an identical retreat where attendants arrive Saturday morning, stay one night, leave Sunday afternoon, a "two-day" retreat. Time span is the only difference. I agree that it cannot (and does not) call itself "Cursillo," but to move all similar, but not exactly identical, retreats to a separate article seems a bit much somehow. It did inspire all these others. Student7 (talk) 21:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of material

message: My edits have all been under my account and signed ... but I do think that this page is way too pro-Cursillo. It also at least until recently didn't actually contain any information about what the program is. 
At least one of those references are primary sources, which is a completely legitimate source.
Genoasalami (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Arguments / Edit Wars

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cursillo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210132842/http://tresdias.org/hp.htm to http://tresdias.org/hp.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cursillo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010303223825/http://www.upperroom.org/emmaus/whatis/history.asp to http://www.upperroom.org/emmaus/whatis/history.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Walk to Emmaus does indeed have a formal method of '4th day' continuity such as the Cursillo 'friendship groups' and 'service sheets' to keep members accountable in their practice of the method. This is in the form of reunion groups. Membership of one is even a prerequisite for being on team for a retreat. Andrewa (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emmaus reunion groups 

message: The article says hardly anthing about what Cursillo teaches. It just says it is a 3 day retreat. Then there is a long history section. This is a major problem. It's hardly worth having on Wikipedia in its current form. Ttulinsky (talk) 08:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does not say what Cursillo teaches