Talk:Tabitha Smith

message: Could we have a picture?  I don't understand copyright law well enough to find one we can use.   DuctapeDaredevil 01:34, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Would an image of Tabby-as-seen-in-Nextwave be suitable? I don't want to ignore her past, but it's a definite image change - and it's the version that's getting attention at the moment. --Mrph 00:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image?

message: :Image:82190-boom-boom 400.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:82190-boom-boom 400.jpg

message: :Image:41254-boom-boom 400.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:41254-boom-boom 400.jpg

message: :Image:Boomer12.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Boomer12.JPG

message: I'd like to point out a few things:
* The SHB now displays her current look.
* The article is condensed, eliminating trivial information. This is an ENCYCLOPEDIA, after all.
* Some images have been removed, because they are either of crappy resolution, or they do not add anything to the article.
* The trivia section is gone, as is desirable per wiki guidelines.
* Toys and games fit under other media.
* The article has a start at references, which all articles REQUIRE.Kusonaga 08:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent editing 

message: Tabitha deliberately freed Sabretooth from his bonds?
Lots42 14:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not so much, although she did hope to engage him in combat/rough him up a bit, which was Sabes' plan, since it would free him. Kusonaga 14:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabitha freed Sabretooth? 

message: That's it?? Now it doesn't say much about her or even the best pic she ever had is gone,I can't believe my 2 years working on my favorite and only x-characters page is ruined.Not that your job is bad, you did good man, man you took off too much stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amsterdamx (talk • contribs) 
:Actually, it says enough about her. It talk about the key points of her fictional life and doesn't delve into overt detail. There was a lot of useless and/or irrelevant info in there. Please remember that Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia, not a fansite, and that it's not really "your" article, as it is the article of the wiki. Kusonaga 06:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not my article either, it's the article of wikipedia. Sorry, but there's no "right" to your writing. It ignores wikipedia policy and guidelines (which I seriously suggest you read up on). Articles should be concise and weed out unnecessary info, again, this is not a fansite. If you want trivial information about Tabitha, that's what a fansite is for, but not wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia. There are guidelines for these things, and you're not following them. Kusonaga 16:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia guidelines state that content should avoid delving into non-relevant and unnecessary detail.  If the major fictional history of a character can be explained concisely and accurately, then that is the most appropriate content.  There is no "right to writing" here.  You're welcome to edit, but if you're concerned about your additions being edited to death, then you're advised not to edit.  If content was in a super-saturated "skip what you want" basis, how would people know where to skip and where to start to get the best picture of the content?  That's already problematic.  As it is, the page is better off.Luminum (talk) 04:58, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  That's it? 

message: Although 'Fusão' would more obviously be a translation for 'Fusion', it is indeed the proper translation for 'Meltdown', since 'fusion' is the scientific term for the event of a substance going from solid to liquid state, -- thus making the Portuguese version of the codename a precise translation, and not an adaptation, as the text suggests.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.0.66.46 (talk) 20:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with the Portuguese version of Tabitha's codename 

message: :Image:Nomt10.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Nomt10.jpg

message: The external geocities link should be deleted, it is so badly formatted as to be unreadable. Plus, geocities. Lots42 (talk) 04:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I own the Nextwave/Forbush Man stories, yet the bit concerning this in the 'abillities' section is still confusing. Lots42 (talk) 06:38, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forbush Man 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Tabitha Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060530122147/http://www.comicon.com:80/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=36;t=004065 to http://www.comicon.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=36;t=004065
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified