Talk:Teen Vogue

message: Removed the stars section: not formatted, and did not contribute to anything. It was just a list of famous people who may or may not have been in the magazine, with no sources listed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.120.13 (talk) 21:50, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Stars 

message: An image used in this article, File:Teen-Vogue May 2012.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Teen-Vogue May 2012.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Teen-Vogue May 2012.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Substituted at 07:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hi  I wanted to inquire about this removal--in what sense is it out of date? Did the magazine resume printing? By chance do you have a source on that? Obviously the entry should be updated to reflect that if yes, but I couldn't find any indication. Otherwise, we don't take information out of entries just because something happened in the past, as after all we are WP:NOTNEWS... Is it rather you think it belongs in the body of the entry rather than the lead? That could make sense to me, it is notably absent from the body and would give space for more details. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I misunderstood the statement! Sorry for the mistake. I've reverted the edit. MidwestCuttlefish (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahhh I see the difficulty! I'll rephrase to say "final issue". Thanks for drawing attention to it. Innisfree987 (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal 

message: Teen Vogue now has anti-capitalist political articles, in what way could we add this? Boskoigic (talk) 00:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You anti-anti-capitalist, Boskoigic? Oh of course you are. You hardly have a talk page.👍 --A21sauce (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-capitalism 

message: There's no need for a paragraph on one article that has drawn "wide-spread criticism", when the only criticism given as evidence (both in the Wikipedia article, sourced Fox News article, and tweet), are statements by one Republican representative, who's right-wing views clashing with the obviously left-leaning article doesn't really classify as "wide-spread criticism" (or create notability) RoadSmasher420 (talk) 07:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed paragraph about the OpEd "An Eviction Crisis Is Coming — We Need to Treat Housing as a Right" 

message: Could we fill in some detail here? It goes from 2004 to 2016 at the top of the History section and into the Leadership subsection.--A21sauce (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aughts to 2016