lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Socialist Review

message: I'm adding a disambiguation link for the American journal of the same title, I assume that won't be a problem. Rafaelgr 23:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thergothon

message: "Perfected" is not NPOV language.  141.149.206.197 22:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This, and several other unfit descriptions were changed. Qwallath 13:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Links:     Musicaindustrial (talk) 09:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You linking the interviews here are much appreciated. Thanks for your efforts. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome. I'll try to find other stuff! Musicaindustrial (talk) 00:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Thergothon Interviews & Other Interesting Links
Talk:Love Wrecked

message: It would be nice if we could agree on a consistent spelling to be used throughout the article – at the time of writing there are 4 mentions of Love Wrecked in the article, versus 18 of Lovewrecked. Can anyone rule definitively on this? -- Picapica (talk) 13:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Love Wrecked'' or ''Lovewrecked''? 
Talk:Whitney Biennial

message: lol. the link to Whitney Biennial 2006 is a redirect to a spoof of sponsorship between altria and whitney. It's an anti-smoking thingy. Gonna remove it.. But if it's reverted, I'l let it be. it made me laugh.--Philosophistry 23:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I seems that as this year is a biennial year, and the last year the biennial will be held in the museum before it moves to its new building, some content updates should be made to reflect the current 2014 exhibition.
--Ombase (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of music video directors

message: This is mostly a list, should we reboot it as List of music video directors? -- stillnotelf has a talk page 23:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. Peter S. 10:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List

message: Guy who keeps adding lots of directors here, please read this:
Hi, thanks for your extensive list of video directors. I think that your additions are not really all that "notable" - many of them don't even have an entry in the music video database. And all of them don't have a wikipedia article. Do you really think these names should be added to a list of "notable directors"? Could you also please get a wikipedia name so that it is easier to reach you? thanks! :-) Peter S. 02:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (cross-posted from User talk:Peter S.) Hello! I commented out the warning to comply with Wikipedia's Manual of Style and to avoid self-references. I don't think that it's necessary to have the warning displayed to everybody who reads the article, because it's only for editors. And I think that if that problem user still refuses to discuss his changes, you should open an RfC. — getcrunk what?! 12:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (cross-posted from User_talk:Getcrunk)'Thanks for your answer :-) I can't do a RFC because I can't talk to the person in the first place: He has no wikipedia nickname, has a quick-changing IP (can't reach him on his talk-pages), doesn't read page comments and doesn't know the rules (doesn't read article talk pages etc.). I don't think he's a vandal, we just need to bring him on the right path, which is by talking to him which is the very thing I tried to accomplish by writing this message on the article page. Have you got a different idea how I can reach out and talk to this guy? I think posting this message in plain view until we have first contacted him is the best (yet unconventional) way. Peter S. 11:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest, if you want to get his attention, leave it as a comment in the article. That way he'll easily see it when he tries to change the page, while it doesn't disturb the MoS that we're trying to uphold by creating text within the viewable article. Girolamo Savonarola 20:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Many edits

message: like omg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.239.128 (talk) 16:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  uhg!
Talk:Scots' Church, Melbourne

message: ----
There used to be a Presbyterian Church called St Enochs across Collins St from where the Athenaeum Theatre is now. It seems this was demolished many, many years ago but it was there in 1875 as this picture shows . Information is very scarce on this building but I was wondering if in fact this was the church demolished and replaced by Scots Church ? Andypasto 00:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I've been wondering how much to include in the section about Scots' response to Francis Macnab's announcement of a "New Faith". I don't think we need to include his new commandments here, as the section is actually about Scots' criticism and response to Macnab, not about his teaching itself.
Further the relevance of the following paragraphs are also questionable:
In a interview with Stateline Victoria Dr Macnab replied to criticism saying that he was in agreement with others inside Christianity who, "are asking the traditional church to re-examine and renew their basic thinking about what faith can be, because millions of people do not find the old faith meaningful to their lives."[13] He said he "would expect that kind of reaction from people who take the scriptures far too literally."[11]
The Uniting Church did not move to discipline Dr Macnab because no formal complaint had been received.[13][11]
Thoughts? Blarneytherinosaur gabby? 02:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right, only the actions and statements of Scots church really need to be included. The new commandments and the above paragraph can both be cut out. StAnselm (talk) 12:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you think the paragraph above the new commandments is too generic (i.e. not specifically directed at Scots') to be included? Blarneytherinosaur gabby? 23:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I do. StAnselm (talk) 00:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Francis Macnab
Template talk:Edsel

message: Nice work on the template. I've added The Edsel Show to it, as it was a groundbreaking television show that was the highlight of the Edsel introduction, though obviously not one that could rescue it (Frank Sinatra's reported snide comments didn't help either). I haven't italicized it in the template, as it looked a bit funny. ProhibitOnions 00:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Edsel Show
File talk:Queen of the north sinking.jpg

message: *Strong Keep - this image has been released to multiple media outlets, the TV station I captured it from obviously did not create the image and the fact that it has been used on multiple competing media sources proves this fact.  In addition, the sinking happened 2 days ago, the image will rarely be used again and the image does have a fair use rational -- Tawker 00:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bath stone

message: I merged this to Bath Stone since we have other article like London Clay and I figure there is either a)a mistake in the title of several articles or b)a convention somewhere that such substances get capitalised as proper nouns. -Splashtalk 00:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I've just moved this page to Bath stone without seeing this comment, per Portland stone and the use of lower case in the OED. DrKiernan (talk) 08:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Case of title?
Talk:Decline and modernization of the Ottoman Empire

message: This article looks as failed version of Fall of the Ottoman Empire - the first paragraphs are word by word the same. Pavel Vozenilek 00:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate article? 

message: The link for the "treaty of berlin - 1885" map actually leads to "Image:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - san stefano.png", which is also wrong because the Treaty of San Stefano was in 1878. --89.190.200.137 21:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link 

message: Do you have any more information on this? March 27, 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.81.167.126 (talk) 02:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information  

message: No mention of the 1840s? Faro0485 (talk) 22:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1840s 

message: that was a pretty big deal...
Schindler91589 (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: no mention of the russo-turkish war of 1828-1829?

message: Do we need to mention WWI in this article? Kavas (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWI?

message: Thanks for the valuable contributions to this article, except that the article covers 19th century instead of 18th century. It seems one editor (who seems to be inactive now) in 2005 used the Battle of Navarino in 1827 and the Second Constitutional Era in 1908 as the milestones. Actually the decline period begins by Battle of Vienna in 1683 (documented in 1699 by the Treaty of Karlowitz)  and ends in 1789 (or 1792). So the text of the article actually belongs to a later era. Although I am ready to move the contents, I'd like to  take a second opinion. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Period of duration
Talk:One-party period of the Republic of Turkey

message: == Which party? ==
It's unclear from the article which party was in control during the single-party period.  If it does not have a name, that should be explained. This information should also be added to History of the Republic of Turkey. -- Beland 01:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: It's unclear from the article which party was in control during the single-party period.  If it does not have a name, that should be explained. This information should also be added to History of the Republic of Turkey. -- Beland 01:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which party? 

message: There is a problem here when talking about the Sheikh Said Rebellion. Suddenly the para starts talking of a "Piran" without saying who this is. At first I thought it was referring to an author but then concluded it was as if someone had searched and replaced Sheikh Said for some sentences with Piran. Piran doesn't seem to have any meaning in Kurdish. I don't know enough about this period to really work out what has gone wrong but something certainly has. Anyone able to sort out? Ealinggirl1954 (talk) 21:03, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Para on Opposition
Talk:River trekking

message: Is this the same activity as river tracing, popular in Taiwan? {59.121.188.179 11:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: River Tracing?

message: This article does not have enough citations for the information that is stated. Without credible sourcing, we cannot prove its credibility. Makaveli334 (talk) 01:21, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Evaluation
Talk:Auton (film series)

message: Is "The Auton trilogy" the title? If it's simply descriptive of the three films, I think that MoS dictates that it should be under the article title of "Auton trilogy" instead. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 02:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there is any major objection, I'll be moving this to Auton trilogy in the next day or so. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 12:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Will (I hope they cannot see, I AM THE GREAT DESTROYER!) 14:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Auton stories}}
Talk:St Joseph's College, Nudgee

message: I have removed the History section of the article, as it was copied from the website http://www.nudgee.com/Past%20Web/nc_tradition/tradition_intro.htm. ... discospinster 00:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted information

message: Tagged for tone and POV.  It is not wikipedia's job to comment on how impressive or beautiful something is.  At most, it should say it is regarded as impressive or beautiful. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Android93 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: The Famous "International Collective" departed in 2000 after five years. This group is widely acknowledged as bringing about an end to the mob mentality which had plagued the school for much of the 1990s.
What on earth is the International Collective? And why is it famous? It is really notable at all? When will the questions end?.... Blarneytherinosaur talk 12:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: International Collective

message: I have removed the NPOV tag - there may have been an issue in the past, but I can see nothing that could even remotely justify the tag now. Nothing in the article portrays the College in an unjustifiably positive light. If anyone can prove otherwise, then do so by all means. Cheers, Rob Lindsey 09:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and removed.  Thanks, Mattinbgn\talk 06:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: It is a member of the prestigious Queensland GPS Association.
Prestigious? How so? JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 04:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are the most expensive schools in the state, the richest, the oldest, the most impressive in all respects including producing the vast majority of the who's who when they leave the GPS schools. Its undeniable. 167.203.18.38 (talk) 15:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Martinez, Georgia

message: If you would like to know why I assessed the article the way I have, please use my talk page. Ethan (talk) 03:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: The IPA symbols indicate a wrong pronunciation of Martinez. The primary stress is on the first syllable. Thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.191.147.243 (talk) 06:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: the locals do not like the Hispanic pronunciation of "Mar-tin-ez" they will correct you if you use it, they say "martin-ez" 146.126.61.241 (talk) 09:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Hecatomb (card game)

message: Recently I've been feeling that this game has been lacking in alot of love and that expanding its Wikipedia entry would be a good place to begin working on this. Thus I propose the following changes and addtions to this article.
* A section on the themes that are prominate in the game of Hecatomb. This could extend to minion types, artistic themes, the general theme of the horror genre which dominates the game as well as the self mocking humor that has been included in the flavor. I would also suggest that the Card Sources be merged into this section as the sources, such as the works of H.P. Lovecraft are some of the game's most prevelent themes.
* A section on the mechanics of the game. This is one of distiguishing features of game which differentiates Hecatomb from other TCGs, most notably Magic: The Gathering, and should have some treatment in this article.
** Made an attempt to add some notes on the game mechanics. - Slordak 17:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Things To Do

message: I'm assuming "yes," given that this is Wizard's, but I don't know from the article. This should probably be mentioned, no?--MattShepherd 20:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collectable or no? 
File talk:Legal hashish shop in Kathmandu, Nepal in 1973.jpg

message: How do you make Hasish?
:That'll be the day, when hashish recipes are on Wikipedia.
I don't understand why this picture represents Hashish. Perhaps as a place to obtain it, but the drug itself, it doesn't provide many clues... Kareeser|Talk! 06:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The image description does say "then legal", suggesting it's not legal anymore. What I want to know, what ingredient exactly makes the homemade bread brown? —Angr (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:KSFH (internet station)

message: Merged content to KSFH. See Talk:KSFH#Merger proposal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NiSaBo (talk • contribs) 22:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

message: The result of the sale of the license in 2015 and a strange bifurcation of the page history is that we have an article separate from the license history. I doubt that the internet station would have standalone notability without having had a broadcast license. What's weird is I can't find anything about the broadcast station's programming since the sale other than what was announced at the time about catering to a South Asian audience. Raymie (t • c) 03:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Brownsville

message: From the Brownsville page:
*Brownsville, Texas, the best known city with this name
That's entirely possible! But in Oregon, Oregon's own Brownsville might be better known (it's a prominent stop on Interstate 5 and it has a pioneer museum whose sign is a regional landmark). It might be the same for any other state that has a Brownsville.
What does everyone think: Should we roll it back to list Brownsville, TX as one of the many cities with this name?
Yansa 01:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Best known city
Template talk:Puerto Rico TV

message: This is getting to be too big. It's listing all the channels in San Juan and Mayagüez, which is what the Category, or a well-maintained List page could do. It should just list the stations in San Juan. I've added a link to the other markets on the island, but please consider this, as it's getting to be quite the big template, and it could stand to lose a bit of size. :)
What i think should be done: re-split these back into San Juan TV and Mayagüez TV, or at least offer those templates as alternatives.
Raccoon Fox 01:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Shoes (Shania Twain song)

message: The song on the album, the single and how it charted on Billboard is listed as "Shoes" not as (Men are Like) Shoes, so it shouldn't be moved there.... --Thankyoubaby 01:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoes vs. (Men are Like) Shoes 

message: This entry needs to get replaced by the gay guy who does the song and video "shoes" on youtube! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.245.42.202 (talk) 15:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: News Flash
Talk:Thermochemical equation

message: This link is no longer valid, does anyone have any ideas of another site that can be referenced instead of this one?
Resource for ΔH tables: http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/guide/sci/chemistry/therm.html
: FWIW, it is archived here — Jon (talk) 19:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

message: As another one said, there is this link that not work:
Resource for ΔH tables: http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/guide/sci/chemistry/therm.html
the article's writer says also that Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) software is available online, can you write where i may find it? thank you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.183.1.47 (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  about links
Talk:HA postcode area

message: - HA8 covers portions of both Barnet and Harrow - the A5 divides the two boroughs. Canons Park and the surrounding area to the west of the A5 are in Harrow, but still have an HA8 post code (HA7, Stanmore, covers the area to the north). Alexisr 01:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: HA8

message: The intro section mentions that HA6 covers part of Hertfordshire, but not that HA5 does.  However, the table indicates that HA5 also covers part of Three Rivers.  I'm not sure whether it does or doesn't - but the two should be consistent. PoisonedPigeon (talk) 13:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Three Rivers
Talk:António Vitorino

message: This guy is really small! Maybe check out and add a trivia about it. - 131.174.122.220 
He's 5'3, apparently (in metric: 158cm, I think), though I doubt it's worth putting it in this article unless he is famous for his stature. - Greatgavini 18:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chevrolet Corsica

message: Should this article ba merged with Beretta? Whopper 01:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: its not the same car, just the same chassisRCHM 02:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: can we find some less un-flattering pictures? RCHM 02:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. Nearly every Corsica I see has peeling paint. Any ideas why? --70.72.36.150 03:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: there was a clearcoat quality control issue for the first few years, certain weather in parts of the country made it worse. But I know there's plenty of better pictures from 92 and upRCHM 15:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: X570, the Corsica did not replace the Citation.  The Citation and the Corsica were not even marketed in the same class. K_Watson1984
It was more of a successor to the Malibu that had been cancelled.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.163.248 (talk) 03:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Predecessor

message: Why is there a link to 1990 Fuel Mileage, and only 1990 Fuel Mileage? Could we perhaps have a link to 1987, 1990, and 1996? Or just a link to the fuel mileage main page? I don't really see that there's anything that makes 1990 better or more suitable for a link than the rest of the years. Shadyman (talk) 04:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990 Fuel Mileage 

message: The Corsica was sold in one generation from 1987 to 1996. However, there are headings for 2nd and 3rd generations. The new taillights for 1991 are not a new generation; that's a minor change. Same with the mild refresh in 1995.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2CFB:D140:4832:71D6:1C05:255B (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Generations" 
Talk:Michael Todd (musician)

message: I can't currently get rid of the blue box around the Basses section, so the formatting looks wrong. If anyone could get rid of it, that'd be great. Thanks
Neverender 899
:The blue boxes are created whenver there is a space before the beginning of a sentence. Mad Jack O'Lantern 06:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I could be wrong, but I don't know of Mic ever doing the falsetto backing vocals in The Suffering. I think it's always been Travis. Rambis (talk) 07:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Backing Vocals

message: This isn't the correct infobox for a musician. If you check those for other musicians, you will see the proper infobox for an individual (be sure you don't copy one from a band page. If you have questions, leave a message on my talk page. --leahtwosaints (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Infobox 
Talk:Karthika Deepam

message: one of the cracker used in the festival mentioned so should be added inside main article (as the main article is still short) Shrikanthv (talk) 07:04, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Karthikai deepam fireworks]] 

message: Hii 2405:201:D003:6091:8DE:C397:24F7:3968 (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karthika deepotsavam 

message: The two sources added about an equivalent celebration of "Karthigai Deepam" in the Trincomalee temple in Sri Lanka, in fact refer only to the Tiruvannamalai temple. The Hindu article too, a semi-protected newspaper article, only talks about Tiruvannamalai and does not mention Trincomalee at all. While the first source is currently broken, but with a title clearly mentioning only Tiruvannamalai and the rites done in this temple.
After further research, it does not appear that the Trincomalee temple celebrates this festival in a peculiar way (compared to other temples in Sri Lanka like the Nallur Kandaswamy or even the Dehiwala Vishnu temple). I mean in a way that makes the Karthigai Deepam of the Trincomalee temple similar to the Karthigai Deepam of the Thiruvannamalai temple (the Maha deepam in particular; which seems to me non-existent in Koneswaram, or in any case incomparable - especially if it is done in the same way as in other major Sri Lankan temples, such as the Kandaswamy temple in Jaffna). 
Most of the references to this subject online are vague and do not confirm the information with certainty.
Drusekoana (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karthigai Deepam at Trincomalee