Talk:Rugby Ralph Lauren

message: :Though the company is still experimenting with a logo, most of the clothing either carries a small embroidered rugby football player or a skull and crossbones motif (a thinly veiled reference to the Skull and Bones society at Yale University).
Are we giving Skull and Bones too much credit (if that is possible)? Many social fraternities and sororities use a skull or the skull and crossbones for "until death" imagery. Could this be a more general reference? Calling it "thinly vieled" seems to be even more critical. When I read this, I thought maybe a grumpy Bonesman had put it up there. --BDD 17:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Skull and Crossbones

message: :Image:RRLlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 16:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:RRLlogo.jpg

message: :Image:Rugby storelist imgfront.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rugby storelist imgfront.jpg

message: You know an article is biased when it's trying to PERSUADE readers to accept a certain point of view without any sort of documentation to back it up: "Rugby was never intended to compete with pre-teen lifestyle brands for collegiate/post-collegiate individuals such as Abercrombie & Fitch or American Eagle. Instead, it offers item such as a its staple: the rugby". Um, there are no quotes/information to bolster the claim that Rugby was never intended to compete with Abercrombie and American Eagle, and I can vouch that Abercrombie and American Eagle have sold rugby shirts in the past, so the claim that Rugby is entirely different because it is named "Rugby" and that it sells rugby shirts (along with other clothing items that would not feel out of place in Abercrombie) is invalid. Not only does the quote not make grammatical sense, anyone who ever visited the rugby website can plainly see that it's selling a style very similar to Abercrombie and Fitch. Just sayin'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.47.121.11 (talk) 07:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is kinda biased