lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Defence industry of Pakistan

message: A list of customers (both countries and organizations) should be added to give more credibility. Anyone that has bought or buys from the Pakistani weapons industry.-99.226.203.145 (talk) 04:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  customers 

message: important defense industries of Pakistan 72.255.15.191 (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  pst
Talk:Awards and decorations of the Pakistan Armed Forces

message: I feel that this article could be improved by addressing the following:
* discussing the history of the Pakistani honours system — when was it instituted (1956, I believe, back dated to 1947, but I'm not sure about this), what existed before then (Commonwealth honours system);
* add some images;
* add more citations;
* expand text to give a brief description of each award and what it is for (distinguished service, valour, gallantry, etc.), if possible the amount of times they have been awarded, etc.
Just a few ideas. Hope this helps. — AustralianRupert (talk) 02:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: In my editing around Wikipedia this has come up many times before.  As a member of WP:ODM we have a policy that give guidance on this matter WP:ODM#Non-English language awards.  Based on that guidance, in my mind Nishan-i-Haider should not be translated.  Most country's highest awards are most recognized in their native language.  However the many other decorations listed on this page would seem to be good candidates to be named in English on the English Wikipedia.  We are told to be bold, but I would like to seek consensus on this before charging forward and possibly being accused of being ethnocentric. EricSerge (talk) 03:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the award names be listed in English on the English Wikipedia? 

message: I think "(Order of Excellence)" looks better, but "(Order of Excellence)" works too. However mixed use, "(Order of Excellence)", looks terrible. Is there a reason for that that I'm missing? SchreiberBike | ⌨  21:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parentheses and italics
Talk:Pakistan Standard Time

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 16:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: The article states it's PST but Zoneinfo version 2009b says PKT (PKST when daylight savings is in effect).  Since the article does not cite it's source for PKT I'm going to change it.  (I'm not sure how to cite the Zoneinfo database). --Schwern (talk) 23:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PST -> PKT 

message: Before the 1960s, and before the split of Pakistan and Bangladesh, did east and west pakistan share India standard time. Also after 1950s when PST was created, was west PST +5 and east PST +6 or were they the same?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garg (talk • contribs) 00:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Timezone in East Pakistan and West Pakistan 

message: Pakistani newspapers, TV channels and other media use the abbreviation PST. While on the internet, the abbreviation more commonly used is PKT.
The name of the time zone is Pakistan Standard Time, and not Pakistan Time, as stated on timeanddate.com.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themadhatter3269 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbreviations and full-forms. 

message: What can we do to stop vandalism? If I have to report it here, the user Vijjusingle Vijjusingle has been blanking out sections, changing dates and removing references.
--Themadhatter3269 00:06, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalising
Talk:Miranshah

message: I don't know where I can find evidence about how many schools are in Miranshah, but I don't believe there is a woman's college there. So please provide sources. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghafoor Shah (talk • contribs) 04:38, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: I made fixing

message: The correct and more widely used spelling is "Miranshah", not "Miramshah". The official and historical spelling is also "Miranshah" (it is named after Timur's son, Miran Shah). Also, Google search results show 1,460,000 results for "Miranshah" and only 205,000 for "Miramshah". Poloplayers (talk) 06:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Miranshah", not "Miramshah"

message: The correct and the more widely used spelling in English language sources these days, that is also close to the native pronunciation, is "Miramshah". Google has now 2,170,000 results for "Miramshah" and only 630,000 for "Miranshah". So I moved the article to "Miramshah". Khestwol (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to "Miramshah"

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. While participation is minimal, consensus is that this is the more common name, with little no to contesting of this. (non-admin closure)  Garnarblarnar (talk) 06:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Miramshah →  – undiscused controversial move, its an headquarter of tribal district bordering Afghanistan it was formally controlled by the militants and it's correct name is Miranshah per sources  see:     103.141.159.74 (talk) 01:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). DanCherek (talk) 01:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Pakistan has been notified of this discussion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 April 2022
Talk:Hyla savignyi

message: The species has been described in 1827 under this name (= without parantheses) according to ITIS. Grach et al. (Grach, C., Plesser, Y. & Y. L. Werner (2007): A new, sibling, tree frog from Jerusalem (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae). - Journal of Natural History 41 (9-12): p. 709-728) are discussing this and come to the same result. That's why I changed it. --Karsten Kohls (talk) 16:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of description
Talk:Oil Bowl (high school)

message: Wikipedia editing norms have changed substantially since this article was started.  Given current editing standards, I am inclined to think that the entire "Distinguished alumni" section should be deleted, since these entries are about the careers of the players and say nothing about their performance in this game. I also have some doubts about whether the detailed recaps of (some of) the games belong here, or whether we should just list the scores of the games in a table.  Opinions are solicited.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessive detail
Talk:Ronnie and Donnie Galyon

message: "possessed the world record for the longest-lived conjoined twins in history when they surpassed prior record holders Giacomo and Giovanni Battista Tocci.[2]"
Although this is sourced, it's bad information. The Toccis have a completely unknown lifespan. The claim of 67 years is one of a dozen claims. The lowest claim is that they lived to 29, and there is no information that allows us to decide between these claims. The claim of 67 csannot be treated as recorded history. 
Different sources used on this page even contradict the one sourced for the Tocci claim, supporting the actual recorded history and Chang and Eng being the previous oldest conjoined twins. 69.113.166.178 (talk) 11:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and in the absence of active controversy: so edited. Thepsyborg (talk) 09:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overtaking record
Talk:Emerald-eyed tree frog

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Rana platanera - Boana platanera.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 10, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-10-10. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Rana platanera - Boana platanera.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Chainhurst

message: Does Chainhurst justify a page of its own? Even Hasted has nothing to say about it, and that is where the text for the 'we love Chainhurst - History' page comes from. Most of the material in this page's history has either been personal opinion or generally applicable to any wealden settlement. What little remains would sit happily in the Marden, Kent page if it were sufficiently interesting.Ed1964 (talk) 11:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Marden page?
Talk:East Farleigh

message: In a community spirited frame of mind, I've left the village fete note in the article for the time being. However I would point out that this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not an advertising space or a community notice board. There are plenty of other more effective and appropriate places for that kind of thing. Danno uk (talk) 19:18, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village Fete 
Talk:East Sutton

message: In this article I read that the inhabitants of East Sutton are included in the civil parish of Sutton Valence. But in the article of Sutton Valence civil parish I read that East Sutton CP is a neighboring parish. To my Continental brain, that looks paradox. Ordnance Survey shows an "East Sutton Road", but it doesn't show "East Sutton" as a place name in any scale.--Ulamm (talk) 21:29, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: East Sutton is still a separate parish but its just that the ONS sometimes merges data for smaller parishes into larger ones. Crouch, Swale (talk)  16:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension of Sutton Valence CP
Talk:Rosenberg's tree frog

message: — Assignment last updated by CalJS (talk) 01:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

message: I expanded the diet section to include details about mature adult feeding during the breeding season. I also corrected several instances of non-italicized "H. rosenbergi". Frogboi123 (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to "Diet" section, sentence clarity, italicization of genus and species 

message: I went in and made a few grammatical and sentence structure edits. I tried to improve diction where I saw fit. I have a few recommendations. I think one would be gathering more references and more research. The more the merrier. The article seems like it is off to a good start. But, many of the categories are very short and there are only 10 total references, which will not be enough to make an article good. The next addition, I think would be to add more images with captions. Other than the bar on the right there is no photos of the frog. I think being able to see images of the frog would be helpful. I think on top of adding more information on the existing categories, another few ideas for more categories to add could include behavior, phylogeny, and ecology. Yarlagaddas (talk) 04:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Edits to Entire Paper
Talk:Arfakiana tree frog

message: How can one go about requesting or creating a bot to harvest info from a site such as http://www.bishopmuseum.org/research/pbs/papuanherps/taxa.html?  There's lots of valuable, ORIGINAL research here, but I don't know that anyone would take the time to get it added manually to Wikipedia.  I'm sure there's a database that exists with all this info in it (species & URLs); I could probably arrange with the authors of the info to make it available to a WikiBot(?), but not sure how to go about it.  Could anyone steer me in the right direction for this?  Thanks!  philiptdotcom (talk) 07:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question for an administrator: how to create a bot?
Talk:Mountain mist frog

message: it is known to be possibly extinct
yfgvo
royygyrv0rfhv8ydrv8y8ey
eruifhwvewuh9hf9uehuwey4ujrujfuffufir99r
fhuffhhhhghghhghgghhg
vvfg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.151.148 (talk) 06:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Osteocephalus cabrerai

message: The article currently reads:
The toes are webbed, reaching base of the dick on the fourth toe.
Is the term "base of the dick" anatomically correct?
Or is "dick" a deliberate obscenity?
Karl gregory jones (talk) 15:21, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Typo, should have been "disk" or "disc"... Micromesistius (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Base of the dick?
Talk:Hispaniolan yellow tree frog

message: I replaced the 2013 IUCN entry with the 2022 IUCN entry.  I didn't see anything in the new version about males calling or about the specifics of threats, but I've noticed IUCN used to support such things before.  Do you have to click on a sub-page or is it actually not there this year? Darkfrog24 (talk) 12:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: IUCN update
Talk:Dong, Dong, Dongdaemun

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 01:24, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Citations are needed for verification, throughout the article. Reliable sources discussing the song should be cited. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Talk:Too Rich: The Secret Life of Doris Duke

message: Which book this miniseries is based upon is under dispute.
A few real facts: The book "Too Rich. The Family Secrets of Doris Duke" by Pony Duke and Jason Thomas was bought as the basis of the CBS mini-series, "Too Rich, The Secret Life of Doris Duke."  The book was fully cediited in the on-the-air film credits appearing before each episode of the mini-series. The book was mentioned and discussed in many reviews including those in The New York Daily News and TV Guide. CBS could not have legally used the title Too Rich, for the mini-series if the producers had not purchased the rights to that name. For more than a decade, the book was properly credited by Wikipedia and IMDb until a pair of jealous hackers decided to attempt to rewrite the truth. It has reached the point where Mr. Duke and myself (Jason Thomas) have started legal action. The producers have corrected this purposeful mistake several times as have I but the hackers keep attacking.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason ThomasAuthor (talk • contribs) 15:55, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Phyllomedusa trinitatis

message: — Assignment last updated by CalJS (talk) 01:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

message: I think you did a really good job and I like how you have the precise summarization of the active peptides, which means much more than merely the ecological aspect. I added some more information to lengthen the page a little bit. Darreciel (talk) 04:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review and revision 

message: The research limitations section does not have appropriate tone. I also question if this section is relevant enough to include in the article. Should it be edited or would it be better to remove it? SpookyFrog (talk) 02:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research limitations section 

message: Some sentences have a tone which is indecisive, for example: Sentences in the descriptive part use the word "described as" for how the frog looks. Wouldn't it make more sense to only bring up it's appearance? I'm a bit new so correct me if I'm wrong.
Furthermore, the sentence regarding males lack of vocal slits refers to an article by CÉSAR L. BARRIO-AMORÓS (5), however on reading the article I could not find a mention of the males specifically lacking this slit.  RoboticBard (talk) 08:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descriptions and questionable source
Talk:The Smart Woman Survival Guide

message: I've marked the "Premise" section of this show's article with the  code. It reads like a press release. I haven't seen this program -- no cable; I found the article following after an old vandal to see what else s/he'd done -- so it would be good to have someone re-write the Premise section so that it sounds less POV or like it was written by someone associated with the show. Thanks. I think that's the proper template to use; if it is not, please adjust. Thanks. Salamurai 16:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert
Talk:Handling stolen goods

message: This isn't a subject specific to England (I know at least America has laws dealing with the same offense). --STUART (talk) 22:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalization 

message: I have moved the follwing passage here from Theft Act 1968. It might contain additional information that could be incorporated into this article, but it is so vague that it is difficult to tell. James500 (talk) 21:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cut and paste from [[Theft Act 1968]]

message: I propose that Handling stolen goods be merged into Possession of stolen goods as they clearly cover the same subject matter with Handling stolen goods being more parochial in scope if more detailed.  In the alternative I suggest that the maintenance template on Handling stolen goods be Possession of stolen goods is clearly an attempt at the page the maintenance template envisions Handling stolen goods becoming. 
Wish-dumain (talk) 16:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 12:30, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Jeevan Dhaara

message: Manushi Shahid • Talk2me 01:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manushi
Talk:Witch's Night Out

message: In trying to expand this article beyond a stub, I've run into a couple of problems. First, I know for a fact that the special was aired every Halloween on the Disney Channel for years but I don't have the first clue how to verify this in a manner Wikipedia would find acceptable. I've also found some new information on the movie itself via a bullet board post here:
http://www.animationnation.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=010741
However, once again, it's secondhand, so there's that nasty independent varification problem again. Between the fact that this will be the first article I'm editing mostly  by myself and Wikipedia's increasingly ironclad rules, I'm almost to scared to post anything.
            Renserin 02:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification Headaches 

message: I know we used to rent this from our local video rental store on a nearly weekly basis when I was no older than 7. Currently the article states it was released in 1995 - there's no way it was that late since I never saw it past the age of 10 and I would have been 14 and living in a different house in 1995.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.36.101.178 (talk) 15:33, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video was initially released no later than 1988 - probably earlier
Talk:Project Cumulus

message: After creating the article via the AfC process, I added some "for further reading" material.  This needs some expansion and better tie-ins with related articles.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs expansion 

message: I've also removed possible vandalism</S>  information that I determined to be 'inaccurate.'  According to the sources, there is no evidence of any conspiracy theory beliefs in these articles and the inclusion of material blaming conspiracy theorist for the what was reported as evidence that records are missing was added without any supporting information to back it up.  Therefore, I've removed it.  However, a covert action by nature requires a conspiracy.Johnvr4 (talk) 16:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Material removed
Talk:List of Pokémon (341–360)

message: Why is there nothing here? 2D Backfire Master (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well now there is. -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 13:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How can anyone prove that Castform was created in a laboratory like it says here? I don't remember hearing that - could someone please cite it? 2D Backfire Master (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not entirely sure on this, but I believe that was stated in the episode Castform was in. MelicansMatkin (talk) 15:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Castform

message: Why do some Pokemon Lists have dozens of references, while this one has only 2, neither of which is in the actual article? If your references are all baboons, it's not good. 2D Backfire Master (talk) 18:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is because lists like List of Pokémon (1-20) have been almost fully completed. Lists like this page havent even been started on yet. If you wish to help then see here. It is pretty simple to fix up these articles. It just takes time. Blake (Talk·Edits) 18:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Nujum Pa' Belalang

message: In the Malay language, 'Ahli Nujum' can be translated to either mean a seer or an astrologer. Therefore, 'Ahli Nujum Negara' would be literally translated as the National Astrologer or National Seer with the former being used in the original English subtitles of the movie itself (actually it used 'Royal Astrologer') but the latter being the more accurate description given that titular character was indeed shown as having such an ability by managing to (accidentally) use magical remote viewing using a bowl of water (the local Malay culture analog to crystal balls used by fortune tellers). 
Additionally, "Belalang" does not translate into 'cricket' in English. It translates into 'grasshopper' and it was indeed a grasshopper which was held by the Sultan of Masai during the impromptu test after the official duel of wits between the two countries' seers. - Azharuddin (talk) 11:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Mistranslated Terms'''
Talk:Gregorovitch

message: The article clearly states that the subject matter is a fictional character in The Deathly Hallows, a notable work of fiction and the seventh and final book in the Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling. Godspeed John Glenn! Will 02:45, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Infact, there is such a page already: Minor Harry Potter characters. I'm going to merge this page with that one and add a redirect. Mark.Howison 04:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Patent misuse

message: Hi, 
I am adding a significant edit to this page on Monday. Please feel free to make necessary modifications: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sashashekhar/Patent_Misuse .
Thanks in advance,
Sasha Sashashekhar (talk) 08:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for the note. It looks very interesting (although I had no time to read through the material in detail yet). Perhaps, you could improve the style by having a quick look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style. You may also want to use :Template:United States legal citation templates. Otherwise, please go ahead! Cheers, --Edcolins (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comments! Sashashekhar (talk) 08:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome! Thanks for expanding the article. --Edcolins (talk) 20:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

text: An idea could be to explain whether the concept of "patent misuse" exists outside the U.S., even under another name. --Edcolins (talk) 20:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Significant edit