Talk:Majin Buu/Archive 2

message: STOP TALKING. Seriously. Don't say a thing past here. It's not worth it, it won't accomplish anything (obviously) - and don't respond to Wikistar, OR ANYONE ELSE, baiting you, it just fosters arguements.. Ignore it totally, and focus on the article. It's not worth fighting over manga, so don't. Now hush. HawkerTyphoon 02:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to Everyone 

message: We're going to discuss this first PE. As obvious as it sounds, some contributors disagree with it. If you're for this Proposed Edit, sign your signature under that section. If you are against it, do the same under that section. However, you must provide at least 2 sentences explaining your reason for that action. That way, others can persuade you why you are wrong, or why they agree. Lets re-build folks!
:In the interest of fairness: Not only will you have provide at least 2 sentences explaining your reason to Disagree but also to Agree. --3bulletproof16 20:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jienum: There's no need, guys. THE PAGE HAS COME BACK!!!!! YIPIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!! Now, remember our agreement, everyone. Let's all be nice, and treat each other's edits with respect, even if they have to be deleted.
* Wiki-star: We still need to discuss matters. As I will always propose my edits, unless other contributors can help me! Wiki-star 20:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki-star's proposals 

message: **Proposed Edit #1: Allow Super Buu w/Gohan the title for Buu's strongest form.
* I Agree:
Wiki-star 20:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jienum: There's no need, guys. THE PAGE HAS COME BACK!!!!! YIPIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!! Now, remember our agreement, everyone. Let's all be nice, and treat each other's edits with respect, even if they have to be deleted.
* Wiki-star: We still need to discuss matters. As I will always propose my edits, unless other contributors can help me! Wiki-star 20:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voting on PE#1 

message: Can people sign their posts using ~~~~? This method of putting your username infront is confusing. People normally do that when they're addressing someone, so it looks like you're all talking to yourself. It's even more confusing when you don't sign your post using four tildes either. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of  YOUR OPINIONS 21:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...which is why I requested rather than telling you to. Never mind. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of  YOUR OPINIONS 21:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep... Wiki-star is like that...--3bulletproof16 21:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signing posts 

message: *I am posting this time because Wiki-Star has not only vandalized here at wikipedia, but he entered a forum of mine and posted idiotic, moronic, and flamatory remarks...it's becoming very annoying. I just want to say that he is being a real chaotic troublemaker and his obscene language and disgusting mannerisms are causing mass havoc. I am excessively tired of his annoying foolishness. I need someone to help me with this child's behavior because he is continuing to vandalize and I am frankly tired of deleting and ip banning him from my place. - Zarbon
* I don't know what in god's name you're talking about Zarbon, but whatever it is, it sure won't get in the way of me contributing! Wiki-star 05:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki-Star's Continued Vandalism

message: * The current state of this article is too broaden, and wide. Majin Buu has fought too many battles to all be thoroughly explained. "VS" battles are only for temporarily seen characters, for example Vegetto or Gogeta. Otherwise, you might wanna keep the article short and concise! Any concerns? Ask away Wiki-star 05:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You deleted more than half the article because they used the word "VS"... KojiDude (talk) 05:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After all that time I put into cleaning up and improving the article, you just had to change it. The article is too summarised like this. I think my way, the detailed one, should be on wikipedia, instead of a very brief explanation Jienum
* Wiki-star: You can still edit your detailed information, but please do not create so much "VS" section. Keep the article concise. Just give a brief, if not a couple detailed description about each section. If you still fail to understand why your format is not acceptable, then i'll just have to keep sinking it in your head the old fashion way. But you're free to reply. Wiki-star 17:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wiki-star, please talk about your edits BEFORE making them. And wait for your edits to be debated before making them. KojiDude (talk) 18:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That won't work. He's under the impression that we need to convince him that his edits are wrong. He's to stubborn to think he's wrong, so he'll just keep going. Nemu 18:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Let's just wait until he breaks the 3rr and then revert it to the old version. KojiDude (talk) 18:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a lil' Too Much

message: Are those sections really nesecary? The reader already knows what Buu did, and re-listing it seems pointless. KojiDude (talk) 19:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the person was new they would read the atricle, then they would know. It already states everything you're putting, just in more detail. KojiDude (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actions and Effects 

message: Ok, Wiki-star, think about it. Read the rules, and think about it. Read your block log and think about it. Read the talk page's archives and think about it. It all points to you being incorrect. Stop being so stubborn. You do have to convince somone: Us. You have to explain your edits before you make them and wait until they are aproved to make them.
You can't say you talked about it because you said "Talk it over on the talk page!" in your edit summary. KojiDude (talk) 20:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You do need aproval, you need somone to tell you your edits are right and you need to prove to us that they're right. So far, that hasn't happened. Just people saying they're wrong. If so many people think you're incorrect, then logically you are. If you disagree with that, it just proves how stubborn and anoying you are. KojiDude (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You've still yet to show anything to imply that your edits are right. KojiDude (talk) 20:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He isn't the one adding a ton of changes. Nemu 21:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Super Buu (w/ Gohan) is just as smart as Super Buu (w/ Gotenks and Piccolo), or even smarter. There's no evidence to prove Super Buu w/ Gotenks is smarter. The effects and actions isn't really needed. It just makes the over sized article longer. The VS sections are fine, its a show all about fighting, and a character made for fighting. There's gonna be alot of VS. KojiDude (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would he lose Piccolo's intelegence? And, Gohan had all the intellegence Super Buu w/ Gotenks had, so there really wouldn't be a difference. For what you're saying to be true, Gohan would have to know nothing about himself or the Z Fighters, and somhow he would cancel out Piccolo's intellegence for no reason. KojiDude (talk) 21:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Show me one page from the manga that implies that Super Buu w/ Gohan isn't as smart as Super Buu (w/ Gotenks). KojiDude (talk) 21:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did he ever show anything of loseing intellegince? No. He made up all those plans to defeate Vegetto, that seems pretty smart (even though Vegetto was smarter). The absorbtion, the candy, the "ripping the universe" thing. If Vegetto hadn't been so strong, those would have all worked. KojiDude (talk) 21:44, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki-star