Talk:Video feedback

message: Please do not remove the images that are directly related to description in the article! If there is a good reason for not having them please take the matter up to discussion.
There are certainly many examples of optical feedback, but that calls for more descriptions and illustrations - not less.
The last removal by User:Tregoweth also messed up the text itself.
So please contribute by adding and clarifying information. Cleaning up and expanding the article is certainly necessary.
Also see the links in the article: The page video feedback in science provides an overview.
It is quite obvious that the images we are discussing are quite relevant to science, philosophy and art.
But are we as editors here to decide what is most important; science, philosophy or art? Certainly all views should be illustrated. These are good examples of how the three merge into on image.  Comments please. --Profero 06:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images or not 

message: How is this image as an example of optical feedback? Or do I misunderstand the phenomena? (This is Adam Savage, the Mythbuster, by the way). Porkrind (talk) 02:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's an example of it!--Profero (talk) 13:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example of optical feedback 

message: I have heard that pointing, say, a DV camera at its "own" image on a connected computer screen can to some extent damage the technology involved. (The person I heard this from was more familiar with non-digital video, however). Could this at all the case? \sim Lenoxus " * " 16:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harmful? 

message: This article started here, apparently as a promo for a fun hack by Profero Graphics.  No source includes "optical feedback" as a topic.  An article on video feedback could be made of this, however.  Dicklyon (talk) 03:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is this? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Video feedback. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110719132859/http://www.videofeedback.dk/vf/ss/model.gif to http://www.videofeedback.dk/vf/ss/model.gif
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091007204011/http://www.videofeedback.dk:80/vf/ss/sspost.html to http://www.videofeedback.dk/vf/ss/sspost.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110520070401/http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/Optics/play/fractalVideoFeedback/ to http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/Optics/play/fractalVideoFeedback/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061017183543/http://www.videofeedback.dk:80/World/ to http://www.videofeedback.dk/World/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Howl-around and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 22#Howl-around until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 22:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Howl-around" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]