Talk:Article Four of the United States Constitution

message: what exactly are the laws of extradition from one u.s. state to another? are states really going to extradite someone from new york to california for a warrant for a speeding ticket? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.154.159.86 (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  misdemeanor 

message: An editor removed all the links in headings, commenting links should never be used in headings: WP:MOS.  Actually, WP:MOS says "Avoid using links inside headings themselves.... Instead, link from the first occurrence of the term in the prose of the section." (my emphasis).  It does not say never.  I have no problem with removing the links in the headings, provided the editor doing the removal follows through and adds the removed link to the text.  If you object to the links, do not simply delete them; instead move them as indicated. TJRC (talk) 02:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links in headings 

message: This statement needs a cite. "Some contend that the clause requires Congress to treat all citizens equally. Others suggest that citizens of states carry the rights accorded by their home states when traveling in other states."  Broadcaster101 (talk) 06:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite needed about competing interpretations 

message: The following paragraph:
*"The Constitution does not require that states be admitted on an "equal footing" with the original states. In fact, the Constitutional Convention rejected a proposal requiring the equality of new states. Congress nevertheless included an equality clause in the statehood acts of admission of states. Congressional restrictions on the equality of states, even when those limitations have been found in the acts of admission, have been held void by the Supreme Court."
Seems to be contradictory. The first part suggests that it is acts of Congress that require equality of new states when they join the union, and that equality is not in the Constitution. However, the last part of the paragraph, and subsequent text in the article, suggests that it is actually Congress attempting to limit equality, while the Supreme Court is upholding equality as necessary constitutionally. Which is correct?  — Amakuru (talk) 10:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who requires equality, the Constitution or the act of Congress? 

message: The meaning is absolute: The Federal Government must govern as a Republic to the States. The entire Constitution outlines and mandates the government. It's modeled after England, why else would they name the region New England? There is no alternate interpretation of the guarantee clause. I see nothing in the US Constitution anywhere that mandates how a state must govern itself: Amendment X would apply.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.191.45.129 (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guarantee Clause Interpretation 

message: This requested move to lowercase clause's of the Constitution is already in a relisting, editors and readers of this page may have an interest. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Full Faith and Credit Clause#Requested move 21 January 2024]]