lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jubilee in the Catholic Church

message: Which version was this taken from? The 1910 version is in the public domain but the 2003 version at http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08531c.htm has this copyright notice:
Online Edition Copyright © 2003 by Kevin Knight. At the very least this article needs a ==References== section givin the 1910 version credit. --mav 02:04 18 May 2003 (UTC)
--------too long: jubilee has not the importance as in e.g. 1910/1 (from Germany)
:: In the US, the Jubilee of 2000 was widely and significantly celebrated. Freder1ck 19:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jubilee

message: The suggestion has been made to merge this article with Jubilee (Biblical).
:Against. The topic in each article is sufficiently large as to warrant seperate articles. While the Christian practice may have its roots in the Biblical, it's occurrence, purpose, and practices are completely different. MishaPan (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: The definition for a Jubilee is the year 49, so as to count a full 7 (example 7x7=49), and no more ;therefore, 50 would be the interrupted count, or end  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.134.91.139 (talk) 20:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: At the moment, the title of this article is "Jubilee (Christianity)" but the article tries to cover it as a Christian and Jewish practice. That makes the title inappropriate. The Judaism-oriented material only started appearing here in October 2012, and it may better be done without here, either putting in a separate article or putting it in "Jubilee (biblical)". As it is, this is combining something that the Jews do not currently observe with something that is under the control of the Pope, two separate things. If we do continue to claim this is one Jewish and Christian thing, the title should be change to something like "Jubilee (religious)". --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic article title
Talk:Order of the Solar Temple

message: What are the beliefs of the Solar Temple? Emmaglisson (talk) 14:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd summarize it as a mix of Heaven's Gate and the Knights Templar. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass suicide 

message: Anyone can do this, but since I seem to be currently the only editor interested in editing this page this is mostly a note for myself, but here are some specific coverage issues/points for expansion that should be added to the article
* expand on their arms trafficking, particularly in Australia (plus the fake mass suicide which is in the page now but has no context)
* fix up remaining awkward french turns of phrase
* expand on canadian activities
* expand on the specifics of what went wrong and why
* 
* expands on the specifics of their theology, what influenced them, etc
* expand on how, exactly, this affected the anti-cult legislation
* 
PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: my plan for this is to cover the ideological background with regard to neo-templar history/all the inspirations and background here, and have more specific sections on the leader's activities on Joseph Di Mambro and Luc Jouret, because it's quite difficult to summarize the background when you're trying to trace the evolution of all three of these things at once PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Upon review the "cesnur source" is actually a trial document, republished by cesnur. Ideally I could find it somewhere else but I seem to be unable to. It's primary but CESNUR's issues don't factor into it so it seems fine. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

text: + integrate controversies stuff and beliefs section into wider body PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  to do
Talk:Hartford, Connecticut

message: it needs editing 67.81.251.230 (talk) 08:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're suggesting a change or improvement, you will need to be more specific. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  life 

message: Do we think this article is ready for a Good Article Nomination again? I nominated it last year, it had failed. However, the article may be ready to actually be nominated again. A lot of the issues mentioned in the last review have been resolved. Trey Wainman (talk) 17:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to go ahead with the Good Article Nomination. It has been more than a years worth of time and the article has changed and expanded drastically. While I am no longer a active editor of this page, I would still love to see it achieve good article status.  Trey Wainman (talk) 08:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article Nomination?
Talk:Richard Antrim

message: A long, detailed article, I place this one at the very top of the Start-class, on the edge with B-class. The infobox needs a picture, if one can be found, and a little tweaking in the wars & battles section. (It might be as simple as removing or adding a square bracket, but I'm not sure what was intended by the author to be put there, so I'm not touching it.) And the article on the whole, as with most articles, could benefit from some expansion, if there is anything to be added. The sections are dense, very detailed, well-written and meaningful, but ultimately not that long. LordAmeth 11:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MilHist Assessment
Talk:Teenage pregnancy

message: When was the WHO found
Which country were involved 
When was it form
How was it form
Who were the past and present sectry general 41.223.132.244 (talk) 13:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information about the WHO  

message: Essay about teenage pregnancy 41.13.148.209 (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English  

message: in our daily lives we face aproblem  of teenage pregnancy due to pregnancy .There is a very high rate of teenage pregnancy and abortion that  may occur.This issue occurs because of the irresponsibility of the you that effect community and individual as a whole.
They are having unprotected sexually activities which may cause a lot of problem suchas HIV/AID'S, sexually transmitted disease, sexually transmitted infection and other sexually transmitted disease
Some of teenagers don't go back to school because they are ashamed of children who will Lough at them.We Know these days you can't get a good job without complete your matrix
My  Once Mandela said "education is a weapon that can change a world for better".
My advice is to inform that .My dear: sisters and brothers let us not jeaberdise our education and experience of future.
I thank you 41.121.63.174 (talk) 22:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thing's that effect community 

message: in our daily lives we face aproblem  of teenage pregnancy due to pregnancy .There is a very high rate of teenage pregnancy and abortion that  may occur.This issue occurs because of the irresponsibility of the youth. that effect community and individual as a whole.
They are having unprotected sexually activities which may cause a lot of problem suchas HIV/AID'S, sexually transmitted disease, sexually transmitted infection and other sexually transmitted disease
Some of teenagers don't go back to school because they are ashamed of children who will Lough at them.We Know these days you can't get a good job without complete your matrix
My  Once Mandela said "education is a weapon that can change a world for better".
My advice is to inform that .My dear: sisters and brothers let us not jeaberdise our education and experience of future.
I thank you 41.121.63.174 (talk) 22:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thing's that effect community 

message: king Williams t 41.114.238.253 (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life orientation
Talk:Child

message: Adolescence should be separate, as it is the in-between of childhood and adulthood.
Preadolescence is also often considered early adolescence by researchers, so where would it fit in?
Could it simply be early childhood and later childhood? 2603:7081:5B44:300:FDC2:AED8:BBBA:D972 (talk) 12:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How should stages of development be organized? 

message: this article lacks eastern and western ancient philosophies on children 2600:1011:B111:B819:3D46:775E:1F72:8602 (talk) 02:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek Philosophers' teachings on Children 

message: @ 102.220.249.216 (talk) 05:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: article actually tells you, it starts: A child (pl.: children) is a human being between the stages of birth and puberty. Moons of Io (talk) 06:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is a child  

message: In this article there is no conclusive definition of what or who is a child. At first we read that a child "is a human being between the stages of birth and puberty" but for the UNICEF, which is quoted at lenght in the article, "A child is any person under the age of 18." https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text-childrens-version
Puberty starts around the age of 10 and often even before. 95.235.217.174 (talk) 14:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Child" is a social construction 

message: "by the Church" - which church?
46.112.6.65 (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear/potential POV:  Age of responsibility
Talk:Battle of Ticonderoga (1758)

message: http://www.rootsweb.com/~canmil/frin/battles/ticond1758.htm
http://olivetreegenealogy.com/mil/usa/frind/batt_ticond1758.shtml
:The first para mentions an 1825 book, though it's kind of garbled.  Perhaps I'll bash on this after I finish having a life (read: running errands :-) ). Stan 17:59 18 May 2003 (UTC)
Please be advised that this battle is more properly known as the Battle of Carillon. Merge & redirect? --Albrecht 22:03, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:MHEG-5

message: Is this an object-oriented or object based language? Mintguy 20:11 18 May 2003 (UTC)
:It looks like but because I have no idea about this so I won't put any. Unfortunately, the term OOP is quite vague in practice. -- Taku 01:39 19 May 2003 (UTC)
::The question was which? Object-oriented OR object based? Mintguy 01:43 19 May 2003 (UTC)
:It depends on your terminology. Some people don't distinguish object-based from object-oriented. They do instead object-based from class-based. -- Taku 12:37 19 May 2003 (UTC)
:There is a very clear difference between object-oriented languages and object based languages. Object-oriented languages embody object oriented principles of abstraction, ecapsulation, inheritance and polymorphism. Object based languages (like previous incarnations of Visual Basic) have objects but they do not follow OO principles. Mintguy 14:50 19 May 2003 (UTC)
:I know you have a clear distinction. But you know some people including me think OO can be either object-based or class-based. Unfortunately in OOP, people use different term for different meaning. Your definition is one of them not the only one that is accepted by everyone. -- Taku 02:59 20 May 2003 (UTC)
:A Object Oriented programming language can be class based (like Java, C++) or Prototype based (like Javascript), it is Object Oriented if it's possible to define classes/objects (I'm being simplistic) and Object Based if it only uses objects in its standard API, like Visual Basic was. That's a clear distinction, the term OOP is not vague whatsoever, further research and talk can be done in this matter, I'll be more than happy to discuss. Bpfurtado 20:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Early on in its life, the focus was on so-called 'multimedia kiosks'.  For example, the authors of this paper describe their "experience using MHEG in a networked multimedia kiosk environment".  I don't know whether or not it is still used in that way.  I've added a sentence about its most common use to the first paragraph.Mark147 20:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:1948

message: I have put a general comment on year layout on my talk page, particularly on the way year by topic is dealt with. There are three different variants and I would like agreement to standardise. This would involve deleting the year by topic from the paragraph list on this page but keeping the box at the top
--BozMo 14:10, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: [ See Talk:1950#Format.  -Wikid77 13:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: The calendars exist on this year but not on others. Also, they begin with Monday which is contrary to American calendars. I am not sure what standard usage is elsewhere. Should they be standardized? JodyB Roll, Tide, Roll 18:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calendar 

message: I have no certain info on which to base an edit but I do note that altho' this article reports that Jim Carroll was born on August 1, 1948, Wikipedia's article "Jim Carroll" reports that he was born on August 1, 1949.
Whosoever has responsibility for the entry may wish to track down the correct info.LAWinans (talk) 19:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jim Carroll]] 

message: Any thoughts on the 1948 Collage. 4me689 (talk) 15:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1948 Fukui earthquake should be replaced by the 1948 Ashgabat earthquake, which caused over 100,000 deaths. However, there are no images of this earthquake on Wikimedia Commons, which is disappointing, but perhaps the city center of Ashgabat can be used as a substitute. The Jeju uprising is also important, as it resulted in the killing of 14,000 to 100,000 civilians, but I am unsure which event to use as a replacement. Nagae Iku (talk) 13:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

text: And I tried to upload the restored versions of the collage images of 1947, 1948, and 1949, but I found that I couldn't because the three images you made were in PNG format, while the ones I made were in JPG format. I couldn't overwrite your images. If I use a file format conversion software, the resulting files will be over 10MB, which is too large for me to upload with my internet speed. Nagae Iku (talk) 13:46, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collage thoughts
Talk:Rationalism

message: Perhaps this deserves a section, or its own article? Here are some sources: Prezbo (talk) 14:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So, in that context, the word "rationalist" derives from instrumental rationality, not philosophical rationalism. That's why they have tags for things like game theory, economics, utility functions, and empiricism. They are not opposed to empiricism, and in fact they generally agree with Hume and other philosophical empiricists that information comes in from the senses, and that the mind just processes the information to manage models of the world and make predictions. The philosophical frameworks commonly favored over there are bayesian epistemology, consequentialism, reductionism, computationalism, and sentiocentric transhumanist values; they don't use the framework of philosophical rationalism at all, and have no conceptual lineage with it. They probably shouldn't be mentioned here, for the same reason that Bayes Rule goes in the rationality article, not the rationalism article. Rationalism and rationality have very little to do with each other but are commonly confused because of the similar name, and giving a group that discusses rationality a section in the rationalism article seems like a case of that confusion. OrangeCroutons (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rationalism", the scene associated with [[LessWrong]] and SlateStarCodex 

message: A few sections in this article lead with what appear to be pull quotes, which are a well-established no-no. I imagine they are potentially very old, but I wanted to sanity-check before removing them. — Remsense诉 11:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent use of pull quotes
Talk:Structural biology

message: I'm planning to add a small history section, covering a few moments in structural biology. In particular, brief mentions of Max Von Laues early X-Ray crystallography work, and the finding of the structure of Myoglobin. I was also considering condensing the methods listed at the start into their own techniques/methods section. Let me know if there is any opposition to these changes, or suggestions. 
Ghuske (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Changes

message: Can someone please connect this value with the Danish one named Molekylærbiologi.
Structural Biology and Molecular biology are similar 84.111.208.114 (talk) 12:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please connect this value with Danish value of “Molekylærbiologi”
Talk:Piauí

message: The following text was added to the 1822 article (links inserted by me):
* October 19 - In Parnaíba city;  Simplício Dias da Silva, João Cândido de Deus e Silva, Domingos Dias declares the Independence of State of Piauí - in Brazil.
I'm confused what this means: Was Piauí not part of Brazil and joined Brazil on that day? If so, this should rather be mentioned here than on the 1822 page. Or did it declare its independence from Brazil on that day? If so, when did it rejoin? Also, who are the three people mentioned (red links)? Common Man 17:10, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independence 

message: Hey folks. Can anyone provide details on whether the 3000 km² land dispute between Ceará and Piauí has been resolved yet — and if so, what was the outcome? //Big Adamsky 21:48, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed territories
Talk:Rio Grande do Norte

message: For a long time starting in 1633, Rio Grande do Norte was under Dutch control, and under this colonial master, the economy flourished, with vast sugarcane fields being planted and many cattle being raised. It is largely thanks to this development that the state is as prosperous as it is today.
This is not correct, the dutch didn´t anythig to help Rio Grande do Norte economy. No road, seaport or any kind of building has been constructed under dutch colonization. OTOH, many massacres happened, like "massacres de cunhaú e uruaçu" http://www.tribunadonorte.com.br/especial/martires/origem.htm (portuguese info, sorry). --Patrick-br 17:41, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Operation Reinhard

message: This is both unconfirmed and highly unlikely.  The people who actually maintain per the engines said that they were petrol engines from German trucks.  Easy to maintain and use.  Soviet tank engines would have to be brought from the front, (highly impractical) and would be Diesel engines - not producing the needed carbon monoxide at any decent rate - and would be hard to maintain, get spares for, etc.  It is true that some people - non technical, and often third party- claimed they used tank engines or submarine engines (similarly impractical) because they sounded scary and more sinister- but this is very much unconfirmed, and disputed.  It would be better to edit this page and drop the claim- apart from anything else, this claim is often highlighted by Holocaust deniers who point out that it is Impractical, and that the  engines would not be good for gassing people. Keeping this claim in the article fuels Holocaust denial. 79.94.163.107 (talk) 18:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of soviet tank engines for gassing. 

message: In the sentence, "the SS pumped exhaust fumes from a large internal-combustion engines through long pipes into sealed rooms", based on the later source (AICE/Jewish Virtual Library), this should probably be in singular for the engine (there were probably multiple engines at the site but it sounds like only one was used per gas chamber for a round of killing). 108.18.207.147 (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo 

message: after note 67, after “local partisans”.
 
Operation Reinhard ended in November 1943. Most of the staff and guards were then sent to northern Italy for further Aktion against Jews and local partisans.(68)
 
this is the citation info:  Stefano Di Giusto, Tommaso Chiussi, Globocnik’s Men in Italy 1943-1945, Schiffer Pub. 2016,  ISBN: 9780764352546, pg. 15-112.
 
this is the link to the book; 
https://schifferbooks.com/products/globocnik-s-men-in-italy-1943-45?_pos=2&_sid=2d4407089&_ss=r Frallallerola (talk) 10:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition that i cannot insert because the document is write protected...
Talk:Haikouichthys

message: What does "Luo, Hu & Shu" mean? -- Zoe
:Names of its discoverers, listed after the species name.Freederick 11:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Below is text from the differently spelled 'Haikouicthys' article, now redirected here.  Maybe someone thinks something from this should be integrated into the article.  (If 'Haikouicthys' is a valid alternative name and not just a misspelling, it should be mentioned in the article.) -R. S. Shaw 20:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Material from 'Haikouicthys'

message: I slipped on my keyboard. I removed it because "it's speculation, we get it." Giant Blue Anteater 01:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed "This type of behavior is speculative."

message: Is the choice of pigmentation in the drawing arbitrary?  Is there any means by which a fossil can predict that?  I was thinking that because this fish isn't really that much larger than Paedocypris (unless it is known to be fatter from side to side), it might have been almost as transparent.  —Soap— 13:34, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pigmentation
Talk:Mato Grosso do Sul

message: The text states that some have called for a name change to Pantanal. Does anyone know more about this debate? //Big Adamsky 00:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change to "Pantanal"?

message: This sentence seems wrong: "July experiences the coldest temperatures, with mean maximum of 25 °C (77 °F) and minimum of -2,0 °C (28 °F) and sun."  The climate box for the largest city, Campo Grande, says record low -0.9 C and average low 14.0 C in July.  I don't know a correct generalization for the state as a whole.
Also, the words "and sun" don't make sense there.
Vox Sciurorum (talk) 21:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 16:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 
Talk:Pseudophilosophy

message: This demarcation problem still seems to be a serious issue for this page. If we cannot define a boundary between Pseudophilosophy and Philosophy (or Pseudoscience, or Natural philosophy, or Occultism... ad nauseam) then we cannot use this term ourselves, and the article should only include cases where the source explictly uses the term. --Andrewaskew (talk) 03:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See also Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Philosophy#Pseudophilosophy. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:41, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still an issue 

message: This article needs more sources. As of this writing, there is only one and it is for a quote. An admitedly contentious topic needs a higher standard. While a quick  Google search suggests that some people are using the term, I personally could not find a definition online other than our own. We really need more than that, epecially if this term is going to be used in other articles or in categorisation. Which also connects to the demarcation problem raised above. --Andrewaskew (talk) 03:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There is no source for the "definition" in the first line. And Rescher's "definition" is not a definition but a personal opinion. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references 

message: Two more articles which I believe should be cross-linked in the "See also" section: Pseudoscience and Cargo_cult_science. What do you think? --158.169.40.10 (talk) 11:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More "See also" 

message: :
The last part of the sentence puzzles me.  Does it mean that the sixth claim – that pseudophilosophy is characterized by immorality – discredits Heumann's claim that it has the other five features?  If not that, what?  One might think that "a preference for obscure and enigmatic language and symbolism," for example, has no credibility to lose. —Tamfang (talk) 02:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  credibility