Talk:Gutter punk

message: this is just a stupid article...
yep... i agree, and the photo sucks.
This is incorrect because all the gutter punks I've met don't "get along" with anyone and crust punks don't like them either, also they claim to believe in anything including peace and what crust punks believe. You forgot to add huge crack habits and criminal records.
WHATS STUPID IS THAT PROBABLY NONE OF THE WRITERS HAVE SPENT A SINGLE NIGHT IN A SQUAT OR TRAVELLED (NOT ON A PLANE) DEF NEVER BEEN AROUND THE YPEOPLE THEY WRITE ABOUT, YET THINK THEY ARE AUTHORITIES, EVEN BEING SO FULL OF THEMSELVES A  DISMISS ACTUAL GUTTER PUNKS COMING ON HERE SAYING, "ER, ACTUALLY, THATS WRONG"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:7000:D5F0:0:0:0:DE15 (talk) 02:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: (Untitled)

message: I added a few lines. Some may not agree, but whatever. I myself have lived on the streets for several years, and hung out with gutter punks, so I know what I added is true. If you want to see the additions, check the "history." -- NME 12:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i happen to be a gutterpunk and agree with this article. i find it rediculous that a bunch of oogles who have no real experience with my kind can feel so justified in their dumbass opinions. good job wikipedia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.183.170.226 (talk) 18:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to the page 

message: I think Gutter Punks are noteworthy enough to have their own article on Wikipedia. However, this article MUST be expanded, and additionally, it must be presented in an encyclopedic manner. I deleted some information that was just not adhering to these criteria, among others.Gstridsigne (talk) 10:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You deleted a very well referenced section with a very vague explanation that it is... I'm not sure what. You'll need to be a lot clearer. "Seemingly offensive, stereotypical" is not a valid argument. It's certainly not "unsourced" (citing the NY Daily News and The New York Fucking Times which seem to be pretty damned good sources for the material from where I'm sitting. If you think the presentation is not "in an encyclopedic msanner", editing, not removal, would be the solution. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, did you read the sourced material? One of them was about runaways and didn't even mention Gutter Punks. The other was OBVIOUSLY biased. Honestly, I really think that this article should be deleted, and I am going to nominate it as such. Also, there is no reason to be so rude, dismissive, demeaning, and condescending. I do not appreciate your tone. Gstridsigne (talk) 22:26, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I will go ahead and refer you to the Wikietiquette article to help you better express yourself in a more positive manner. Gstridsigne (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've added my comments to the AfD, addressing your concerns about the sources you removed and listing additional sources you may have missed in your search. (I'm sorry my comments upset you. The "tone" you heard was not the tone I intended.) - SummerPhD (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted seemingly offensive, stereotypical, and unsourced information 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gutter punk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170713164809/https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20170713/wicker-park/chris-north-land-tavern-attack-fight-outside to https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20170713/wicker-park/chris-north-land-tavern-attack-fight-outside
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140506092201/http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20130521/wicker-park/traveling-gutter-punk-homeless-back-city to http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20130521/wicker-park/traveling-gutter-punk-homeless-back-city
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090623064413/http://www.latimes.com/travel/la-trw-haight29may29,0,2245563,full.story to http://www.latimes.com/travel/la-trw-haight29may29,0,2245563,full.story
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified