Talk:Clandestine church

message: Category:Netherlands main page DYK articles
See :nl:schuilkerkArnoutf (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I think that the article name should be moved to Clandestine churches.  Reasons are this is an  English language encyclopedia. This was a Europe-wide phenomenon so a Dutch name is not really appropriate.  and Clandestine churches is the name Kaplan settled on in writing what is the best modern source on the phenomenon.  AMuseo (talk) 01:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would not object if it is really the same, propose the change. The Dutch situation may have been slightly special in that the Schuilkerk did not always need to be hidden; it only needed to be unobtrusive. For example the Delft Remonstrant schuilkerk is a small church building (including turret) which can be reached by passing through a coach-gate to an enclosed square. Everybody must have know it was there, but as it was not readily visible. Also the Loosdrecht Remonstrant Schuilkerk was a small church building in the backyard of the preachers house. The house was on the street, and if you look carefully in winter (no leaves) you can see the church from the street (but you have to know). A catholic Schuilkerk near Geldrop was built just one meter into Limburg, allowing the Brabant parish easy access to a church by crossing an unguarded border (basically crossing the border would be entering the church - that close to the border). I am not familiar with the European situation, so I am not sure whether it was common that the location ofv cladnestine churches was always that much public knowledge. Does anyone know Arnoutf (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Clandestine churches  were not absolutely secret.  They were permitted by the authorities, either de facto or de jure.  But, and this is crucial, they weere permitted on the condition that they be discreet, that they not draw attention to themselves.   "Secret" churches dis exist, the definition would be that they were not legally tolerated and that a penalty would be imposed if the worshipers were caught.  For this reason, they were more likely to consist of something like a temporary altar in an upstairs room, not of an interior space decorated as a church.   The small synagogue at Theresienstadt, a decorated interior in a shed in a back garden, would be a secret church.  And there are rooms in English houses known to have been  used in this way.  But, as I said, the clandestine churches were legal, but forced to be invisible or nearly so.  part of the confusion, of course, is that as the centuries passed they were increasingly able to come out of the closet.AMuseo (talk) 12:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Yup I was also hesitant about the translation, but apparently similar things occurred outside the Netherlands, and English historians have adopted the term "clandestine church" for this; so this is no translation by a wikipedian but actually verifiable. So we follow the English term even if we think it does not cover the Dutch one.Arnoutf (talk) 18:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed rename

message: The article mentions churches established after the Patent of Toleration (1781) in Bohemia (and even before in Slovakia). Some examples can be found on the list of Czech ones or absolutely marvelous one in Slovakia is the Lutheran Church in Hronsek
Ceplm (talk) 13:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czech examples of the churches of tolerance