Talk:Treacle

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Treacle, sugary brown syrup, was widely-used herbs that served for many purposes. It was believed that it can cure internal swellings, fevers, unblock internal stoppages, alleviate heart problems, rid blemishes, improve digestion, induce sleep, strengthen limbs, heal wounds, remedy snake wounds, cure prolapsed uteruses and rid the plague. This was another smart invention of Galen, and it was combined with more than sixty ingredients such as roasted viper skins to formulate the potion. It involved forty days to mix and twelve years for the solution to mature before it could be used. 
: Gordonofcartoon (talk) 19:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation?

message: I find the Production section confusing. After reading the sugarcane article's refining section and the cane sugar mill article I think I understand it better, the exception being at what stage and how the "dark-coloured washings" are produced or separated. With the proviso that this still requires explanation, is this re-write correct and does it make matters clearer:
"Treacle is made from syrups that remain after sugar is removed in its refining process. Raw sugars are first treated in a process called affination so that, when dissolved thereafter, the resulting liquor contains the minimum of dissolved non-sugars to be removed by treatment with activated carbon or bone char.  The dark-coloured washings are treated separately, without carbon or bone char. They are boiled to grain (i.e. until sugar crystals precipitate out) in a vacuum pan, forming a low-grade massecuite (boiled mass) which is  centrifuged, yielding a brown sugar and a fluid by-product—treacle." ?
This however, like the current version, doesn't make mention of the clarification with phosphoric acid and calcium hydroxide. Does this need to be mentioned and does it shed light on the creation of the washings? Mutt Lunker (talk) 01:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 

message: Regarding the recent linking to the Spanish article melaza and in reference to the edit summary, molasses is not the same as treacle in English but as far as I'm aware there is no differentiation in Spanish. This does however lead to both molasses and treacle linking to melaza but melaza only linking to molasses and not treacle. Not sure of a way around this... Mutt Lunker (talk) 07:39, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to Spanish wiki and v.v. 

message: Okay, I am a complete novice with absolutely no understanding of how Wikipedia entries are compiled. However it seems odd that this article on Treacle which lead me to the Treacle Mining article has a number of paragraphs (all without preamble or explanation) on the joke about treacle mining headed, A History, in the Popular Culture section, while the Treacle Mining article (that's all about this joke) fails to mention Sarratt at all. Why is it even in the Treacle article, that's a simple factual food item article, when there's a separate section dealing with the "joke". It should maybe just have a mention here, under Popular Culture, and be fully written up in the Treacle Mining article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.132.182 (talk) 10:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replied over at Talk:Treacle_mining#Sarratt_Treacle_Mines  —SMALLJIM  11:34, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture - Sarratt Treacle Mines 

message: On  Feb13 2016, the following text was added without citation:
In Asia, Treacle is a food sweetening syrup made from the sap oozing from "tapped" blossoms of palm trees, particularly, Coconut (Cocos nucifera) or "Kithul" (Caryota urens). Treacle is a common ingredient across traditional sweets prepared for occasions, such as weddings and the Asian New Year festivities held in mid April.
This does not specify where in Asia this occurs, whether the English word "treacle" is used or if that is a translation of a local term, or if this actually refers to Jaggery. I've removed it from the main article but quoted it here so that it can be restored if someone finds a cite. Collabi (talk) 05:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asia treacle 

message: Please add nutrition info - magnesium etc.-71.174.190.122 (talk) 17:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  nutrition info 

message: It may seem needless to Brits who have heard the word more often but, e.g., these Americans imagine it to be something like "tree-ack-uhl" so I do think it's worth mentioning in the article, as well as the Wiktionary entry. — LlywelynII 11:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Anybody who's used both as ingredients can tell you they are not the same. Treacle is much more bitter and more viscous than molasses - even blackstrap molasses. You can't substitute treacle for molasses in US recipes and substituting molasses for treacle in UK recipes will produce a different result. ('Treacle' is black treacle here.) I can't tell if the article is supposed to suggest they're the same, but it certainly does suggest that - as do other entries on syrups etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.92.125 (talk) 20:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Treacle vs. molasses