lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Krause

message: What sort of last name is Krause? 66.41.66.213 06:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And is it really pronounced to rhyme with "grocer", as the phonetic transcription says? Do we have a reliable source for that? Other websites seem to say it rhymes with "wowser" which seems more like what you might expect. Flapdragon 03:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to know the official pronunciation too, I pronounce it as though he was German, and it sounds wrong to me every time.  Are there any instances of Peter saying his own name? interviews or anything?--NeF 00:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. I'm from Germany and we pronounce Krause like "c(r)ow-the" [COW with an R behind the C and THE]. 95.90.145.66 (talk) 10:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a very common German name, it means "crimp", "frill", "gather", "quilling" or "ruff". When you pronounce it correctly, it does rhyme with "wowser; the "c(r)ow-the" version is misleading (but keep in mind that most Germans cannot pronounce the English "th" correctly).Sam Golden (talk) 15:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  German for curly? 

message: For some reason it will not allow me to place the sentence "His parents were teachers." in the early life section. I removed it from Personal Life because this information usually appears in Early Life. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence I Removed
Talk:Peter Gordon (composer)

message: One person or two? Both are definitely named exactly "Peter Laurence Gordon" from New York. See my last edit. The cruciverbalist is the editor of the New York Sun puzzle  and National Puzzlers' League member "Torpedo" since 1989 . JJB 22:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, I had utterly forgotten that this conversation even happened. But thanks anyway, I'll definitely be bookmarking that on my Spotify. Bearcat (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Musician and cruciverbalist

message: I stuck a connected contributor template for myself on this talk page. I've been careful (and will continue to be careful) to restrict myself to minor fixes; I'm really glad someone else has done the heavy lifting of the most recent massive update to the article. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Connected contributor

message: Really good article about Peter Gordon in the New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/23/arts/music/peter-gordon-adjacent-records-downtown-minimalism.html --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source to draw from
Talk:Peter Lax

message: I put in a paragraph in the article about the "Lax conjecture". Perhaps someone else could put in a brief summary of important mathematical results due to Lax, especially theorems, etc., which are named after him. Perhaps this could be one section of the article. In particular, seems to me it would be good if the "see also" links could be incorportated, with a brief description, into this section of the article itself. What I gather about Wikipedia policy/culture is that an informative sentence on noteworthy matters with links in it is preferred over a list of links. Anyone wanna confirm, am I right about that? My1wiki2username3 14:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add section on Lax's mathematical results? 
Talk:Peter Lehmann (winemaker)

message: I'm coming at this from a Wine Project perspective on the notability thing.  As far as the Wine Project goes, we're more interested in the wine than the people, but people are good if they're interesting enough.  So we'd definitely want an article on Lehmann the wine company, in fact it would probably count as a Mid Importance to us rather than Low, and would look to discuss Lehmann the man as part of the winery article in the first instance.  But a biographic splinter article would be fine  -the winery is one of the most notable in Australia and it's very much his creation. So if this article does fail the tests of the Biography gods, the Wine Project would rather it be renamed Peter Lehmann Wines rather than be deleted altogether - there's already a redirect to that effect linking from the Barossa winery list. FlagSteward 08:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good comment.  Lehmann wines are very well known here in Ontario, Canada. Slowmover 18:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely agrees with the notability! Not just does his wine seem to be sold everywhere (you can find several of them in Sweden where I live), he's probably the best known name (and credited as a quality pioneer) from the district Barossa, which in turn is probably the best known place for Australian Shiraz. For example, he was interviewed on Jancis Robinson's Wine Course (probably the best-selling wine course on DVD). I would guess that if you would select the two most internationally well-known persons that have been working in the Australian wine business, it would be Max Schubert (creator of Grange) and Peter Lehmann. Tomas e 22:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remeber correctly he was the one that 'saved' barossa, when the big companies dropped the price of grapes and Lehman decided to buy and keep the wine industy alive (but need references for this), think it should be part of this page, definitly notably even by wiki standards. --Stefan talk 01:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is discussed in the references I added, but they are not independent of him. --Bduke 01:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Peter Lew

message: It would be good to get some more detailed biography of Peter's business dealings. It seems a bit unbalanced at present with the focus on a single statement he made when appointed to a company's board. (Perhaps this was a big controversy at the time? I wouldn't have thought so though...) Natebailey 10:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Peter Lieberson

message: I have some notes from a talk Peter Liebersen gave at Harvard in Nov. 1994 where he called King Gesar his "1st opera" and was "working on second opera" (i.e. Ashoka's dream).  I wouldn't normally consider Gesar an opera, but figured it is worth mentioning in case anyone wants to argue for changing the genre of it on the biography page.  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 04:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Luff

message: An issue with this article has been raised at WP:BLPN#Peter Luff. January (talk) 16:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have today raised a new discussion which can be accessed from the same shortcut. January (talk) 10:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

text: I have removed what seems to me to be trivia, per WP:UNDUE and WP:BLP Cwobeel (talk) 14:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLPN discussion
Talk:Peter Lundgren

message: Bot picked this up and the stub templates were removed from the main page.  After evaluating the article, upgraded it to a C-Class article based on having references, but those references coming from sites that I'm not familiar with.  It lacks a picture of the player, and only contains minimal information that may not fulfill all reader desires.  There's also some need for some clean-up to make it read more like an encyclopedia entry (one comment regarding Sweden's tennis success comes to mind, but I'm not a sufficient expert on the subject to make a modification). Gnowor (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-Assessment
Talk:Peter Lurie

message: On the MI wiki it says he was in the game but here it doesn't wwas he and it's not on the list or is the other wiki wrong?
Source
http://miwiki.net/Kristopher_Kilometer  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.222.28 (talk) 00:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monkey Island?
Talk:Peter MacNeill

message: Is the reference to an illegal video hosting site really allouon wikpedia. Alaphent (talk) 18:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Icefilms

message: There is a ton of unsourced content that evidently relies on IMDb that is not considered reliable. Otr500 (talk) 21:16, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Talk:Peter Madsen (footballer)

message: It seems more appropriate that this guy's headline is renamed Peter Madsen (footballer) so that the really (in)famous Peter Madsen gets the main article. Somebody agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.25.39 (talk) 15:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: . However, I currently don't see any primary article for Peter Madsen, as the incoming links were a combination of footballer, cartoonist and pianist. +mt 23:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Madsen (footballer)?
Talk:Peter Manfredo Jr.

message: Readable now, But in need of some serious reworking. Jihmiller (talk) 16:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 
Talk:Peter Mankoč

message: Thanks for the External Link to Swim rankings, but that wasn't where all data came from. I noticed there are 2 or 3 disciplines, where Mankoč has better times than those listed in his SR profile. With that link included, it looks strange, if somebody compares the results. --JTrdi (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swim Rankings 
Talk:Peter Mansfield

message: The controversy between the two men designated by the Nobel Prize committee and their competitor must be mentioned here.  At this juncture, excluding it as if it does not exist risks NPOV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.203.102 (talk) 01:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The wonderful thing about Wikipedia is that anyone can edit it. But I've reinstated the section for you. GyroMagician (talk) 12:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nobel Disputed

message: The Head of the School of Physics and Astronomy has tweeted about the death of Sir Peter Mansfieldhttps://twitter.com/Physics_HofS/status/829705896221691904. This has yet to appear in a news source such as the BBC etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomwilko2005 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death? 
Talk:Peter Martins

message: Martins has received a lot of negative press and accusations but with no actual charges that I'm aware of.  I think this article is overly negative, even gossipy as it stands and could benefit from adding some professional accomplishments, his connection with George Balanchine, etc...to balance the tone. And some early ballet pictures. Lmlmss44 (talk) 05:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too negative
Talk:Peter Matera

message: Some other references I found but haven't worked in: Sydney Morning Herald (work in Pilbara with Swan Districts), ABC (short paragraph on his retirement), AFLPlayers (Eddie Betts' ranking of his top Indigenous players). – Teratix ₵ 02:45, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Peter Hugoe Matthews

message: This article seems to be written by the person concerned in't.
Therefore, I propose speedy deletion.  The are numerous facts which back this up, such as the fact that given the birthdate, the alleged books written could not have been published at those dates, and the general lack of reference to this person elsewhere. Indiealtphreak 23:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Strange comment, especially regarding the publication dates. Try bibliographies in linguistics books for references to Matthews. Pecsorin 14:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion proposal
Talk:Peter Maxwell, 27th Baron de Ros

message: I've been following wikipedia's links and this title is a subsidiary title of the Duke of Rutland. So how can someone other than an heir of the duke of rutland hold this title? 121.73.7.84 (talk) 00:55, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The familia are connected, but you are confusing this title with that of Baron Roos, which is held by the Duke of Rutland. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 14:07, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

text: I'm not confused, the links are muddled. 121.73.7.84 (talk) 09:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused 

message: When was this guy born?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.24.29 (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  When
Talk:Peter Mayle

message: I believe you missed The Vintage Caper; New York; Alfred A. Knoph; (2009 on my copy) and The Marseille Caper; New York; Alfred A. Knoph; (2012 on my copy). http://bpl.bibliocommons.com/search?t=smart&search_category=keyword&q=Peter+Mayle&commit=Search Dick Kimball (talk) 15:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This can be verified at: http://bpl.bibliocommons.com/search?t=smart&search_category=keyword&q=Peter+Mayle&commit=Search, I tried using the "ref" HTML tags to "Cite my sources," but I couldn't get them to work. I've left them in place in case some experienced Wikipedia editor is inclined to educate me. Dick Kimball (talk) 16:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Peter McNeeley

message: Are there any sources to back up the statements in the Notoriety section cause if that stuff is true the guy has really pissed away his life. --Bushido Brown 22:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ROFL

message: I'm not a big boxing person, but was there more than one McNeeley vs Tyson fight? Because the article says Tyson knocked out McNeeley, but I just saw a video of the fight recently, and McNeeley's corner called it quits, there was a knockdown in the fight but no knockout. Unless there was another fight that's talking about it needs to be corrected.
MMAACKS 04:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Knockout
Talk:Peter Medak

message: medak's career has been amazing. Early on, he proved his chops with Joe Egg and the ruling Class, and then kept at it after seeing his career nosedive through the floor with such utter crap as the gay blade; after a couple of 'off' decades,'he's a potent creative force in both tv and film. Amazing persistence.
12:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Messerli

message: Nice stub - though a little more information will make the stub better. --Bhadani 04:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).  The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. --Edcolins 16:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice
Talk:Peter Miles (English actor)

message: This is a really niffty article.  I remember this guy from Dr. Who and I am pleased he is still alive.  The article lacks his burtday though...  Someone should be a doll and fix that.  --68.118.201.68 (talk) 13:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of the actor? 
Talk:Peter Moffatt

message: According to this post, Stage and TV Today reported that he died on the 21st. of October. I can't find any on their website. I don't know which newspapers in the UK usually carry obituaries like these, but if anyone else finds any we could add a proper cite. Davhorn 16:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: I changed this to the exact date from The Times obituary for the time being. I've seen some other sites use 1923, so does anyone know where that one comes from or if The Times is wrong? It should be said I later found an error in The Times obit which says his wife died in 1959 when it is 1999. Davhorn (talk) 18:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:Peter Møller

message: On the danish wikipedia it is mentioned that his is actually the current "Fodbolddirektør i DBU (Dansk Boldspils Union)" which seems like it really should be mentioned in this wiki. Honestly I don't know the english equivalent to 
"Fodbolddirektør i DBU (Sporting Director of Dansk Boldspil Union)?" but it is quite a high position as far as I know (probably one of the highest in the DBU hierarchy, correct me if I'm wrong) and he have been the front face of DBU for several years, so if anyone can formulate this in english please do. Siggimund (talk) 01:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fodbolddirektør i DBU
Talk:Peter Moore (serial killer)

message: I added an infobox with an image and a victims section, and deleted all unsourced info. --*momoricks* (talk) 13:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit 

message: Four - or five?
Four listed, and in header.
Perhaps amend the middle bit?
Autochthony wrote  0030z 22 Dec 2009.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.73.148.164 (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Moore said he was also guilty of the murder of Clocaenog forest man, however, his claims were apparently dismissed by the police due to him not telling them the correct date. Which in my opinion is a flimsy reason not to convict him, but all extant sources side with the police, and Wikipedia policy says we have to go with the reliable source's line. Just to clear up why there may be some confusing edits. Phil of rel (talk) 22:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Victims

message: This is in the 'Violence against LGBT people in the United Kingdom' group, probably because most of his victims were gay. A few sources say Moore himself is gay, so I'd just like to know if it's still violence against LGBT people if the attacker is LGBT himself?
Kohran (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that wikipedia says we ought to do what the reliable sources do when these issues come up and say that yes it is violence against LGBT people even if the perp is LGBT.Phil of rel (talk) 15:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT question 

message: I have two concerns about including him in the see also section:
1) how do we know Norris was gay? I've never heard that he thought of himself as gay.
2) it might be interpreted as linking murder to homosexuality, as the see also section is supposed to be relevant to the contents of the article. Plus if we're just including people for their targets or sexuality, Dennis Nilsen and Jeffrey Dahmer should be included too. But that makes the scope of that section far far too broad.--Phil of rel (talk) 22:05, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collin Norris in "see also" section
Talk:Peter Müller (skier)

message: Dear Sir, I would like to suggest to read the German Wikipedia but, anyway, I did add the reason in the article. In all seasons with deduction points there were different regulations to those of the present. FIS-websites are wrong because not take into account that matter.  --Skiscout (talk) 12:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downhill World Cup: No win in 1981-82 
Talk:Peter Ndlovu

message: I hate drive-by taggers so just a quick word on why I tagged this. It reads, to me, like someone's own essay or blog piece about the player. There's nothing wrong with that but I don't think the place for it is an encyclopaedia. Phrases like "but not before the legendary curtain raiser to the 93-94 season" and "a thrilling performance" sound like a personal opinion, not a factual piece about the player. It would be good if the article could lose a lot of this - or, if it is quotable comment from a verifiable and authoritative source, quote it and reference it. I'm sorry, I hate to rain on anyone's parade as I can see a lot of writing has been done here, but it's really not right if it sounds so much like a personal article. Best wishes, DBaK (talk) 22:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essay tag 
Talk:Chronicle of a Summer

message: Okay, I'm pretty sure that this article is plagiarized, at least in part:
From here:
 	
:User Comments:
:8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful:-
:a slice of life, 14 December 2000
:9/10
:Author: Fiona-39 from Belfast, N.I
:This film, made in the summer of 1960 by the sociologist Edgar Morin and the ethnographer Jean Rouch, aimed to be as 'true as a documentary, but with the content of a fiction film.' Facilitated by improved technology (16mm film, sync sound, light hand held cameras) it pioneered a direct or live aesthetic dubbed 'cinema verite'. It was to film 'true life', but engage on a subjective level, getting people to talk about their experiences and ambitions, and most notably, whether or not they are happy. What emerges is an absolutely overwhelming cinematic experience, a film that is deeply affecting but also that makes you think. The film begins with a market researcher, Marceline, on the street, asking people whether or not they are happy. This sequence seems to me both to confirm the importance of human relationships and point up the dissatisfaction that living in a society about to tip into consumerism engenders. The film then moves to concentrate on a set of characters. Morin was criticised for his structural approach, typing his characters (i.e. a factory worker, a petit bourgeois, a student), but a real sense of the individuals involved shines through, notably in the sequences with Angelo and Landry chatting, and Marceline recounting her experience of deportation during the war. The most revolutionary part of this film is that the makers demonstrate the impossibility of documentary objectivity when they film themselves filming - they show how the truth of the film is constructed. Questions of authenticity abound. At the end of the film, they screen it to the characters involved. Even those filmed are unable to decide whether they were acting ('hamming for the camera') or being themselves. Morin and Rouch conclude they have failed in their aim to offer a slice of life, as the very act of filming something transforms it. Truth is elusive in the attempt to represent the everyday. This film is far from a failure however - watch it and be blown away. 
This was the text for an early version of this article.  Subsequent edits have attempted to paraphrase, but really someone should delete the entire thing and write someting from scratch.--Birdmessenger 12:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't see the relevance of that long quote by Jean Rouch in relation to the rest of the article. 145.18.30.103 (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote
Talk:Peter Newsome

message: This is clearly a publicity advertisement and not an encyclopaedic article.
The full content is a direct copy of his own web site.
Wikipedia as free advertising, yet again.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.100.45 (talk) 09:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-promotion
Talk:Peter Nicol

message: Historian932 (talk) 03:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website is no more 
Talk:Peter Niedmann

message: I added the deletion tag to this page because there is nothing notable about this person that is sourced. --Eezurr (talk) 15:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion