lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carantanians

message: Dear 194.249.36.106,
the "barbaric state" simply means a state other than Roman Empire or a new state established after the fall of the Empire, not "underdevelop", "cruel" etc.!
Regards
: TomS 13:53, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This is a peyorative way to call old slovenians. I think it offensive and following old pangermanistics ideas. If not, let´s call bavarians as "pre alpine Germans".
I prefer to call things by their name. 
About the authors mentioned by Jalen they are known for beings nostalgic of Yugoslavia, I mean panslavic ideology.--Marcos G. Tusar (talk) 11:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Alpine Slavs"?
Talk:U.S. Route 10

message: I noticed one route sign for US 10 west of Missoula, MT (at the Airport) that says - I believe - TO US 10 (can't remember which direction).  Not worthy of mention in the article (it's original research), but its an interesting piece of trivia.  There are many areas (some referenced) in the nation where US shields are present on decommissioned routes. --master_sonLets talk 15:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, you see one for US-99 (now WA-99) on the University Street on-ramp to the (soon-to-be-demolished) Alaskan Way Viaduct in Downtown Seattle. Ahfretheim (talk) 06:40, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting fact 

message: The US 10N and US 10S Divided U.S. Routes of US 10 should be added to this page. Charlotte Allison (Morriswa) (talk) 14:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divided highways in Montana
Talk:Dalkeith

message: I'm not sure whether to bring back the links to Eskbank and Woodburn even though they had no articles. I would argue that any links to Eskbank and Wooburn would be pointless as I believe these places to be suburbs of Dalkeith. Even if they were to have separate articles they would probably end up being merged with the Dalkeith article anyway. As for now i'll leave redirect pages.Mr Eko Let You Live 11:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Update:  a separate stub article on Woodburn existed for a while at Woodburn, Midlothian or similar name, but was deleted following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodburn, Midlothian closed just now.  The decision to close should have been the consensus decision to redirect, and a redirect or two have been set up, from Woodburn, Midlothian to this article, Dalkeith.  Some mention of Woodburn neighborhood within this article would be very appropriate. --doncram 21:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Eskbank and Woodburn

message: The informal tone of the preamble is not suited to an encyclopedia article e.g Woodburn... could not be more different. I have therefore changed it to "Woodburn is an industrial and residential area to the South of Dalkeith"
13th Sept. 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by J.Zweiblumen (talk • contribs) 15:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =Tone of Article
Talk:Oegopsida

message: No morphological description. How would I recognize an oegopsin if I happened to bump into one down town or came across one out in the ocean. Exhaustive taxonomic lists are OK, but they say nothing about what they are listed under. J.H.McDonnell (talk) 20:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Getting to know you
Talk:U.S. Route 14

message: Why are there two Alternate US 14s? The one in South Dakota looks like its shorter than the one in Wyoming. --Patricknoddy 15:32, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Alternate Route|Alternate Routes]] 

message: Why in Rochester, Minnesota does U.S. 14 come with U.S. 52 and with U.S. 63 and then in Owatonna, Minnesota with Interstate 35 and then in Brookings, South Dakota with Interstate 29? --Patricknoddy 15:40, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you asking why Rochester doesn't have a direct connection to an Interstate? I couldn't say.  Maybe because Hormel is in Austin and "won the war" with Spam?  ;-)If you're talking routing, I'm not entirely sure about the historic routes of Highway 14 in Rochester itself, but it used to run along what are today's Country Club Rd./Olmsted County 34 and Dodge County 34 from at least Olmsted County 22/W. Circle Dr. on the east end.  The 4-lane divided highway was built in the 1970s and had reached Byron by the time I was born (1978).  Today, you can get to County 34 by continuing west from where 14 meets U.S. 52 where 14 becomes Salem Rd.  If you stay on the road, it becomes W. Circle Dr.County 34 used to run straight west parallel to U.S. 14 as Frontage Rd in Byron, but Byron tried to build a commercial/industrial park in the 1990s and changed the routing so it now wiggles north a bit.  The old crossing between County 34 and Frontage Rd is removed now, so people wishing to cross need to take 10th Ave SE instead.  While I'm at it, I'll say that the bypass around Dodge Center is recent (2000s decade).—Mulad (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: US Highways and Interstates are numbered in a grid pattern; even numbers are east–west and odd numbers are north–south.  For US routes, higher numbers are to the south and west and the opposite is true for interstates.  That being said, US 14 and US 63, as well as I-35 and I-90 fit into their grids perfectly.  US 52, on the other hand, is a diagonal route (it runs from North Dakota to South Carolina), so it is the anomaly here. —Fredddie™ 21:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other [[Highway|Highways]] 

message: Why was Philip, South Dakota the original West Termini and Winona, Minnesota the original East Termini? When there's no section that says Historic Termini. --Patricknoddy 15:45, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic [[terminus|Termini]] 

message: Why is U.S. 14 one of only 2 national routes that serve Pierre, South Dakota the capital of South Dakota? --Patricknoddy 15:50, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pierre, South Dakota]]
Talk:Des Turner

message: I think it's unusual to redirect from a proper name to a nickname; and there are more links to "Desmond Stanley Turner" than to here.  Shouldn't this be a redirect page? Mkmcconn — 16:36, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Manhattan Project

message: Things which should go in this category:
*People involved with the Manhattan Project (Fermi, Oppenheimer, Compton, etc.)
*Places specifically important to the Manhattan Project (Los Alamos, LBL, Oak Ridge, Hanford, etc.)
*Some organizations involved (Manhattan Project, OSRD, etc.) 
But not too broadly -- I wouldn't include UC Berkeley or Univ. Chicago, or FDR, or United States of America, because they did so many other things other than the Manhattan Project that it just seems silly to make them part of its category.
"Nuclear weapon" would not be part of the Manhattan Project -- it should be the other way around. Hiroshima is obviously related to the use of the atomic bombs, but to say it was part of the category "Manhattan Project" seems to be a stretch. Anyway, just some thoughts, to keep the category useful... --Fastfission 16:41, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Grace

message: This disambig page should really start with a link to an article on grace itself. Grace is as deserving of wikipedia content as wit, charm, and humility (or pride, greed or envy). A link to a dictionary definition does not suffice.
Grace is the essence and power of God's provision. Oluwaseyi229 (talk) 04:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Grace itself

message: Unlinking redirect of this talk page to talk:Divine Grace. Maurog 10:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I notice there is no mention of grace as being the property of "elegant movement; poise or balance." Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but surely a mention of that meaning can't hurt? Maurog 11:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that's covered via the Wiktionary link in the box on the righthand side of the page. --Elonka 17:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nope, that only has the name in it. 74.245.38.202 02:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name Grace means gift fom god or it can also mean graceful. Grace is a Latin name. Other versions of Grace include: Engracia, Graca, Gracelia, Gracella, Gracia and many 41.114.114.184 (talk) 22:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grace Name
Talk:Liberalism in countries

message: I think the description of liberalism in Europe is mis-leading. The "broad tradition" of liberal parties in Europe were most definitely on the left, as they advocated free market capitalism in opposition to the protectionist capitalism of conservative forces during the nineteenth centuries, and advocated individual liberty in contrast to the traditional right-wing opposition to all forms of liberty. Liberalism was shifted to the centre when group rights and progressive alternatives to capitalism developed with the rise of socialism. In Europe the word still generally refers to the broad left/centre tradition. --User:195.92.67.71
:This issue is not too simple to solve, and for instance "National-Liberals" are/were not necessarily perceived as centre-left, but by and large, I would agree, stressing the Liberals' role to promote democracy, freedom of religion, abolishment of guild privileges, women's rights, minority rights and civil rights in general, international charity, etc, etc. /Tuomas 12:58, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That history is there in Liberalism, or at least it was last time I read that article. John, do you think it would be useful to bring more of that here as well? -- Jmabel | Talk 19:13, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
Hmm...yes, I knew the history was present there.  Perhaps this entire article should be scrapped, and this should all just be discussed in Liberalism.  The title certainly doesn't make much sense.  It should be Liberalism in different countries, at the very least. john k 19:40, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: I accepted the challenge :-) and integrated the content into liberalism --Gangulf 20:47, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Europe
Talk:Steve Bartman incident

message: I Think there should be a section about the incident in popular culture as I remember seeing it on a few television sitcoms, most notably family guy where they imply Stewie convinced Steve Bartman to do it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.206.251 (talk) 19:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture 

message: I added this piece by Glanville because he talks about why he thinks it was unfair to blame Bartman. This was in the section that defends Bartman and criticizes the people who blame him. I don't see why it shouldn't be included. Arnabdas (talk) 17:51, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I might have been a bit hasty, especially since Glanville himself was on that Cubs team. I did reword some things, to empashize the point I think you wanted to make. Zagalejo^^^ 18:26, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012 NLCS Comparison 

message: The Bartman Seat is listed as Section 2, Row 8, Seat 108. However, there is no section 2 (or 1 for that matter) at Wrigley Field. This is the current alignment. Is it possible someone meant to write section 102 or section 3?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.72.192.192 (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 2 Does Not Exist 

message: Why does the summary state that "several spectators attempted to catch" the foul ball?  There is no other part of this article that supports such a statement.  The picture used refutes such a claim entirely, showing no one other than Bartman and Alou attempting to catch the ball.  Indeed, there are several spectators in the photo who appear to be specifically trying not to catch the ball, shying away for possible fear of interfering with the play.
I recommend that this statement be edited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigJackMan (talk • contribs) 19:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed "several spectators attempted to catch". Meatsgains (talk) 21:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Footage of the incident clearly shows at least one other spectator (the man in the light grey sweater at the left of the photo) also reaching out for the ball. He withdrew his arms a split second before that photo was taken.--Muzilon (talk) 01:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about summary 

message: 2 fans reached for the ball, not just Bartman.  There are a number of articles/interviews with the man in the gray sweater named Pat Looney who reached for the ball right next to & in front of Bartman, but Bartman was closer by less than a foot as it sailed just beyond Looney's reach.  They were the only two reaching for it beside Alou and there are plenty of slo-mo YouTube videos confirming this.  Looney is shown in full extension until the ball hit Bartman's hands and never withdrew them.  This could have just as easily been a Pat Looney article if not for luck of the draw.  Why isn't Pat Looney mentioned in this article? PhilOSophocle (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pat Looney
Talk:Current events/Archive 6

message: I just deleted all events from June 27, as they were simply Associated Press headlines in all their headline-speak glory ("Iran vows to resume nukes", and the hideous "Drug links alleged in Mexico editor slay"). I considered trying to rewrite them but thought, well, be bold. Current events doesn't exist to reprint AP news anyhow. -- Avaragado 09:36, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, daft as those headlines are, rewording them would probably be a better idea, since the page is here to carry brief summaries of news stories, appropriately written. But then, I guess if you just delete them, someone can add them properly from scratch as easily as you could have rewritten them. *shrug* - IMSoP 09:57, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: My main motivation for deletion rather than rewriting was that Wikipedia is not a news service. It's for the contributors to decide what news events to include: AP's agenda is not Wikipedia's, and vice versa. On balance I thought Wikipedia's agenda was better served by deleting the AP headlines, but it could have gone either way. -- Avaragado 11:56, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Avaragado vows to slay AP headlines

message: i think this news should stay in the current events a little longer, since it afects the whole european union (25 countries), also its a news that appears in the "frontpage" of the important media - --Cyprus2k1 16:37, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  New president of the European Commission.
Talk:Malcolm in the Middle

message: The "Rank" in the table under "Reception" doesn't match up with what is found in, for instance, the articles covering the 1999-2000, 2000-2001, or 2001-2002 TV seasons. Is the "rank" in this article solely among 18-49 viewers? If so, this article should say that.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 17:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Annual Rankings
Talk:Attacker

message: Matt, I appreciate your tidying up instincts, but must note that the sense you have condensed to a dab pointer has now been lost. Adversary speaks only of crypto usage, not computer security usage. As I review this in my mind, I don't think I've ever heard adversary used in computer security -- it's almost always attacker (or cracker, or hacker amongst the psuedo informed and law enforcement types). Although I do recall one use of 'enemy' (spoken, so I can't testify as to uc or lc). 
I think this change has lost information for our Reader. ww 19:30, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The information can be found at the Adversary page, which the disambiguation header links to. — Matt 16:52, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't think attacker and striker are synonyms, as this article implies. Attacking midfielders and wingers might also be classed as attackers (as might a marauding defender in a particular situation). Forward is closer in meaning, but still not perfect. Dave.Dunford 17:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Football context

message: Is it really relevant to have this table in this article, which is about forwards in general, and not merely association football attackers? It's not sourced, and a non–registered user keeps changing the formatting so that it doesn't conform to wiki standards, and I don't think it's relevant; if anything it could be added to the article on strikers with 500 or more goals. I removed it but my edit was reverted. Could the page be protected?
Thanks, Messirulez (talk) 23:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoring Table
Talk:Congressional Space Medal of Honor

message: 156.33.18.43, are your sure that the Columbia crew were awarded the CSMH? I see that the Challenger crew were so awarded a few days ago, but I can't find any announcement anywhere that the Columbia also received the award this year. 169.154.204.2 19:31, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind my above comment. I have run across evidence that the crew of Columbia was awarded the medal on the anniversary of their deaths. For example, the official astronaut biographies now cite the award. 169.154.204.2 21:18, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbia 

message: Is there a reason that the award info after the awardee's name is in subscript? Makes if harder to read, and is non-standard on WP. I'd like to change it, if there's no objections. Akradecki 05:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Font?

message: The description at an astronauts name is describing why the individual received the Congressional Space Medal of Honor. Edward White didn't received the medal just because he flew on Gemini 4, else James McDivitt would have one too! Please stop posting irrelevant information. Necessary Evil 20:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gemini 4 ??? 

message: In the Recipients table, the † symbol indicates a posthumous award. I was wondering whether this symbol is the most appropriate symbol, since it is a christian sign and not all astronauts who have been honored with the award are christians. I saw that the entries in other languages use * or explicitly mention "posthumous" (expect the russian version, that currently also uses the †).
I don't know about all astronauts, but Ilan Ramon was jew for sure. Not only he was jew, he also tried to express it in many ways during the mission he was killed in (he took a Torah with him, asked for Kosher food, carried a Mezuzah etc.). Personally I believe that after trying to emphasize he's being Jew, adding a cross next to his name is not as sensitive as expected.
(There are also other solutions but using * or explicit mentioning, like using the relevant symbol for each astronaut - for example - Star of david next to Ilan Ramon).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.176.0.154 (talk) 23:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See Dagger (typography). Reywas92Talk 00:19, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The † symbol  

message: This page states that this is the highest honour NASA can bestow. So does the page for the NASA Distinguished Service Medal, which states that the DSM is "the highest award which may be bestowed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States. "
Which is it then, & can someone fix this? zarathustra (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously the phrase on this page, unverified by citation, is in error. Though it is obviously a higher honor than the NASA DSM, it is not "bestowed by NASA", but by the President by the will of Congress. Easy enough to fix. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highest Medal?
Talk:LVMH

message: The first two subsections of the Controversy section ("John Galliano's anti-semitism" and "Sebastian Suhl") don't seem offhand to be about LVMH, at least not directly. Should they be removed? Carnivalier (talk) 02:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two of the sections in the "Controversy" section aren't about LVMH 

message: Why do they allow or order their Heuer watch brand to carry the name of TAG on the dial, rather than LVMH Heuer on the dial, or just Heuer on the dial? If they don't want their own name on the dial, why do they think Heuer's origins should be diluted by someone else's name other than Heuer, in this case being TAG, on the dial?
Can anyone research this information?
Middle More Rider (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do LVMH give free advertising to rival TAG? 

message: — Assignment last updated by XiaoyuChennyu (talk) 23:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu
Talk:Elizabeth Bibesco

message: In the fall of 2015 a production of a new musical was mounted in Madrid. Titled Mi Princesa Roja it tells the story of the doomed Spanish Phalangist José Primo Antonio de Rivera. The story of the demise of the Spanish royal family and the rise of the Republic, anarchism and fascism is a difficult political subject for a musical and the author has added a little emotional warmth by introducing Elizabeth Bibesco, wife of the Romanian ambassador, as a love interest. In thirty years of exploring the life of Elizabeth Bibesco I have never found a contemporary reference to her as "The Red Princess". However, it is certain that Princess Bibesco had romantic feelings for Jose Primo, though it is uncertain if they were ever consummated. And it is certain that Jose Primo harboured romantic feelings for Elizabeth, though it is equally uncertain whether they were consummated. After leaving Madrid in 1931 Elizabeth kept a close eye on the developments in Spain and in Germany. She wrote more than one anti-Hitler, anti fascist letter to the editor of the Times during the next few years. She also personally attempted, unsuccessfully, to broker a pardon for Jose Primo after his incarceration by Azana and the Republic. In 1940 her last book carried the dedication to Jose Primo that became the kernel of truth behind "Mi Princesa Roja". Elizabeth Bibesco was a complicated character who used the word "love" overly freely. In her life she saw herself as a romantic heroine; her dreams and wishes seldom led anywhere but to disappointment. Her relationship with Jose Primo de Rivera was probably one such romantic escapade - more dream than reality.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.239.179.235 (talk) 00:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mi Princesa Roja
Talk:Lower Bay (TTC)

message: We should either also have another article for Lower Queen or merge the two into an "abandonded subway stations of Toronto" page. Brad
Why does the subway route map on this article show Union station as being a multi-level station? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.19.140 (talk • contribs) 
: It is incorrect.  I think it meant to say "transfer station." Cleduc 21:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I made a note on  to that effect.  I may look at it if I can figure out how to edit that... maybe the Gimp can do it. Cleduc 21:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)