Talk:Banbury railway station

message: Some of these are still in service now. These include:
* Birmingham - London - there are regular Chiltern Railways services from Birmingham Snow Hill to London Marylebone
* Newcastle - Bournemouth - regular services from Edinburgh - Bournemouth and there is one CrossCountry service weekdays from Newcastle - Bournemouth.
* Edinburgh via Newcastle - Southampton - regular services from Edinburgh - Bournemouth. There is one CrossCountry service weekdays from Edinburgh via Newcastle - Southhampton.
* Birmingham - Oxford - one Chiltern Railways service from Birmingham to Oxford very late at night.
Manm hk (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of former services through Banbury 

message: Re Banbury_railway_station#Events - different sources give different information see Talk:British_Rail_Class_220#Banbury_fire and British_Rail_Class_220#Technical problems and incidents
If anyone can clarify this can they either change the articles or leave a notice on the British Rail Class 220 talk page.
Thanks.FengRail (talk) 19:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 220 fire

message: I have tidied this item up up (see edit history) and renamed it to reflect its subject. I've also removed some confusing non-encyclopedic and unverified information. 
I am also dubious about the photo's inclusion: it shows a VT 220 whereas the incident involved a CC train and it is, frankly, not a very good quality photo. Be that as it may, I have repositioned it to ensure consistency, to avoid 'islanding' the text between graphic elements, and in accordance with Wikipedia:Images#Forced_left_justification which states In most cases, images should be right justified on pages, which is the default placement. Andy F (talk) 08:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the mention of Bournemouth, because the source does not mention Bournemouth. Further, the source states that the train was going to Derby, and also gives the time as "at 4.25pm". If the train was on time, then according to the Dec 2007-May 2008 timetable, this would have been the 15:40 from Reading to Derby (arr. 18:34), which would have called Banbury 16:25. Of course it could have been the 13:45 from Bournemouth running late, which should have called Banbury 15:53, but that is an Edinburgh service (arr 22:24). --Redrose64 (talk) 22:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yup, I agree with you Redrose. Andy F (talk) 08:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Train fire 

message: I am putting them in better positions.--Wipsenade (talk) 11:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Does anybody know which Banbury station will be used for the East West Rail Link? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither. Banbury is way off course. Where did you see that it would pass through Banbury? If any new route were to serve Banbury, it would be Bridge Street, a.k.a. General, for the simple reason that Merton Street no longer exists. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:42, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I confused my Bs! I meant Bicester! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan to reopen Oxford - Bletchley line via Banbury{{spaced ndash}}which Banbury? 

message: There is a new Platform 4, replacing the bay (at the southern end of platform 3) that was taken out of use by August 2016. The track for the new platform 4 is the former up goods loop around the back of platform 3, and the platform itself has been created by filling in the space where the track for the former platform 5 (a bay at the northern end of platform 3) had been. The new platform 4 was brought into use after 21 June 2017, certainly on or before 28 June 2017. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform 4 

message: Should the services listed under ‘The Station’ be moved into the ‘Services and operators’ category? I was considering just doing it, but I thought such a large change should be consulted upon first Class444SWRail (talk) 18:43, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The arrangement at  would be a good one to follow, it is the model used by most station articles. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:56, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Services