lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject France/Archive 1

message: Is it possible to add the above template to talk pages of all France related articles? STTW (talk) 11:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a request for Bot assisted addition at Wikipedia:Bot_requests#WikiProject_France_Bot STTW (talk) 09:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: STTWbot has been approved and will be tagging the  articles under my guidance. The current tagging in progress can be seen on the STTWbot page. STTW (talk) 10:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|WikiProject France}} 

message: I have proposed new stub templates at WP:WSS/P   to further sort the france stubs STTW (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New stub templates  

message: I wonder if it would be better if the DYK section -- which features new articles -- should be removed from the main project page and placed with the New Article Announcement subpage?  It certainly doesn't demand the same amout of attention as the other sections on the main page. --NYArtsnWords 05:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK section 

message: I can't seem to find an article on this topic, by which I mean the incident in which French charities associated with the National Front began serving "pork soup" in their soup kitchens in order to prevent muslims from accepting their charity. It has supposedly caused serious debate in France and has recently been banned by the Conseil d'État. --Jersey Devil 16:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Soup au Cochon Incident

message: * List of characters of La Comédie humaine‎ is currently up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters of La Comédie humaine.  Please come and help save (even better, improve) an article about a seminal part of French Literature. —ExplorerCDT 17:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD notice
Talk:Chromium(IV) oxide

message: "However, it is still used in data tape applications for enterprise-class storage systems" - citation(s) please. To my knowledge there is no more production since 2003. 46.115.6.76 (talk) 06:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Production

message: Why no reference to this as a cigarettes additive?184.155.134.43 (talk) 01:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Cigarettes? 

message: "The chromium dioxide crystals were perfectly formed", are the dioxide particles crystals (rutile structured compounds may well form needles) or are they pseudomorphs after the chromic acid? The iron oxide maghemite is used in magnetic tapes as needleshaped pseudomorphs after lepidocrocite)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 12:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crystals or [[pseudomorphs]] ? 

message: " It is still considered by many oxide and tape manufacturers to have been one of the best magnetic recording particulates ever invented." - I think this calls for citation(s). Fritzfun (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Eino Leino

message: The Musical settings section I added was previously removed as unsourced. I have restored it with sources for each work and claim, and removed what couldn't be sourced properly. Please feel free to comment, correct, and add works, as the tradition of Leino's poems to music is a rich tradition and integral part of its reception. Musiktheaterpedia (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical settings
Talk:Chrysoine resorcinol

message: * http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/newsroom/publications/choosingtherightstuff/foodadditivesnumeric1680.cfm
* Alkanet
--58.38.43.199 (talk) 05:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing infos ...about the topic....
Talk:Cicutoxin

message: Does it strike anyone as odd that the melting point(s) are both above the temperature at which the molecule is said to decompose, under "boiling point"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.142.79.108 (talk) 17:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for raising this issue. I checked various sources, and ChemSpider says that the boiling point is 467.2 °C. This has now been changed. Bibeyjj (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melting and Boiling Points 

message: The chirality center (C-14) is annotated with an S in the IUPAC name, while the PNG image shows the R-enantiomer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfie2k (talk • contribs) 09:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereo chemistry discrepancy
Talk:Évariste Vital Luminais

message: The French title Les Énervés de Jumièges is translated in the article as the enervated men of Jumièges. The modern meaning of "enervated" in English appears to be "to make tired", but previously it seems to have had the meaning "to deprive of life-force by removing sinews". A French source in English (Musée des Beaux-Arts) describes the sons as having the tendons of their muscles burnt, which accords with the posture of the two in Luminais' painting (not just "hamstrung" but their arms rendered useless as well). Since Clovis II died at the age of 20 or 21, these two poor sods must have been not more than 4 or 5 years old when they revolted. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 09:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the source, which enabled me to explain that. (Yes, it is fortunately only a legend.) Yngvadottir (talk) 16:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The sons of Clovis II 
Talk:Cinnamaldehyde

message: The Synthesis section contains this line: " Cinnamaldehyde decomposes to benzaldehyde at temperatures around 60 °C.[14]".  This seems inconsistent with the boiling point of 248C shown in the info panel, and could use correction or further explanation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.181.202.130 (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to remove this statement previously, but upon reading the paper, I removed it again.  Some editor really wanted this statement included (possibly an author on the paper).  --Smokefoot (talk) 18:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Decomposition

message: The biosynthesis figure is wrong - acyl-CoA's don't have an oxygen-sulfur bond  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.86.70.151 (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Oxygen-Sulfur bond

message: Cinnamaldehyde content in cinnamon oil is not 90%, but usually in the range of 60-80%, higher in cassia cinnamon than true (Ceylon) cinnamon https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0926669012002622 Realdoctorstu (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cinnamaldehyde content is wrong
Talk:Citronellal

message: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/Lookup.do?N5=CAS%20No.&N3=mode+matchpartialmax&N4=107-75-5&D7=0&D10=107-75-5&N25=0&N1=S_ID&ST=RS&F=PR
http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esis/
--222.67.203.102 (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A red link is based on the info of.... 
Talk:Citronellol

message: I've removed this comment, "Citronellol is a specially allergic inducing component and should be avoided", because it is unsourced and non-NPOV. If a reliable source concerning the ability of citronellol to induce allergies can be found, it should be added back in (as a more neutral statement). --Ed (Edgar181) 17:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I am totally confused. The wikipage for Citronellol describes the two isomeres (R)-(+)-Citronellol 
and (L)-(-)-Citronellol but the figure apparently only shows the (R)-(+)-Citronellol. The figure on 
the wikipage for Rhodinol seems to be equal to what I would expect for (L)-(-)-Citronellol. If 
(L)-(-)-Citronellol is equal to Rhodinol, it should be mentioned in the text. Is it true? 
- Thanks for any info!
Antonindvorak (talk) 11:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Rhodinol has a different position for the double bond, so it is structurally different.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citronellol vs. Rhodinol 

message: locate the chemical with a CAS number of 107-74-4--222.67.203.102 (talk) 05:15, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help please.... 

message: (−)-β-Citronellol
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/ProductDetail.do?lang=en&N4=C5286|SIGMA&N5=SEARCH_CONCAT_PNO|BRAND_KEY&F=SPEC
--222.64.30.155 (talk) 07:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infos for red links... 
Talk:Co-dydramol

message: The lead-in for this article states "Co-dydramol is in fact part of a series of combination drugs available in the UK  and other countries including Co-codaprin  (aspirin  and codeine), Co-codamol  (codeine phosphate and paracetamol) and Co-proxamol (dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol)."
And yet, under "Formulation" it states "All formulations contain 500 mg of paracetamol per tablet"  (emphasis mine in both paragraphs)
Could someone with more knowledge fix this, as it would appear that not all formulations contain APAP, or DHC, as a matter of fact. Kailey elise (talk) 16:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You're reading it wrongly - co-codaprin is something else. Co-dydramol is always paracetamol (acetaminophen) plus dihydrocodeine. But I'll try and make it a bit clearer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.204.9 (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency?
Talk:Cobalt green

message: Some of this article is unclear or badly written and I think the references may be excessively redundant. I'm not sure how much I can improve presently, though. Ullpianissimo (talk) 07:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Having tried to make some improvements, I've addressed the redundant references (though they may still be less than optimal), but made little progress on the unclear parts. I've also added a chembox as this seemed to be indicated by the Chemicals project, but it still needs revising. Ullpianissimo (talk) 07:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mohammad Mohammadi Gilani

message: There is no verified proof that he did in-fact pass sentences of death unto his two sons. There is only vague comments made by Gilani in regards to "dealing with opposition members" and "Do whatever you do to others".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.69.136.179 (talk) 00:20, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Execution of sons 
Talk:Henri Manguin

message: Hello, I believe the links I'm adding are within Wikipedia's guidelines. The guideline page outlines this occasion for posting links:
1. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,[2] amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons. 
I work for the Utah Museum of Fine Arts and in order to comply with our copyrights to specific artworks and to provide access to specific works we are connecting records about artists and their works from our website to Wikipedia. The University of Utah, our parent organization, asks us to keep all information on our website as it is easiest to update and add information to our database and have people access it through links than it is to seek out all of the places where we can contribute information and then change facts and images should they be incorrect. We uphold the highest academic standards and want to make sure that any information we push out is controlled for quality and accuracy. As for the conflict of interest, yes I work for the Museum. Our motivations are to comply with University copyright restrictions while contributing to the academic integrity of Wikipedia. I hope that I'm understanding the guidelines correctly and complying. Please clarify if I am not. Thank youCris Baczek (talk) 16:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding External Links 
Talk:Cobalt(II) oxide

message: I think that this article should not be called a stub. Cobalt II oxide isn't a very common chemical, so there probably won't be much information on it.--98.221.179.18 (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating of "Stub" 

message: I've removed this text "the earliest examples go back to 12th century German pottery." with the reference:
Zamek, Jeff: "A Problem With Cobalt?" Ceramics Today http://www.ceramicstoday.com/articles/zamek_cobalt.htm
Zamek actually wrote: "It can be found as a decorative element in the earliest 12th century salt glazed ware produced in Germany."
The use of cobalt blue in colouring pottery and glass goes back to the bronze age – for example see: Rehren, T. (2001), Aspects of the Production of Cobalt-blue Glass in Egypt. Archaeometry, 43: 483–489. doi: 10.1111/1475-4754.00031 , Tite, M. S. and Shortland, A. J. (2003), Production Technology for Copper- and Cobalt-Blue Vitreous Materials from the New Kingdom Site of Amarna—A Reappraisal. Archaeometry, 45: 285–312. doi: 10.1111/1475-4754.00109. 
It is probably better to discuss the history at cobalt blue.Aa77zz (talk) 11:21, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early use of cobalt blue
Talk:Hexaamminecobalt(III) chloride

message: The complex cation [Co(NH3)6]3+ is referred to as a "moderately strong" Bronsted acid. Since this is a little surprising, it would be of interest to add its pKa value as well as a reference.  Dirac66 19:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tried unsuccesfully to find this number (a reference would be welcome), but the pKa for the pentammine aquo is 5.8.  Maybe I should remove the word "strong".--Smokefoot 21:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the suggestion - you are correct about the probable Bronsted site being the water ligand in the pentammine aquo thing.  But ammines can be fairly acidic, I just have not seen the data for a few years.  FYI, an appropriate comparison for (NH3)5CoNH2-H3+ ionization is with NH3-H+, not NH2-H. Most chemists are surprised by this aspect, but its kind of archane.   Your comments will motivate me to dig up a good source, and until then, I will comment out the section that is of concern.--Smokefoot 01:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bronsted acidity

message: In the body text, hexAammine is used, in the title hexammine. Should body text be adapted to match the title or should the title be adapted?
Simon de Danser (talk) 11:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The refs are inconsistent (one Inorg. Synth. uses each!). The infobox says the double-"aa" spelling for IUPAC and also gives the double-"aa" as an alternative, which is confusing (surely one form is systematic and "the other" "a" vs "aa" is alternative?). DMacks (talk) 03:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well sorry.  I think I started this monster.  It and Tris(ethylenediamine)cobalt(III) chloride have required regular servicing to capture all the possible names.  The ammine vs amine is one problem, the hexaam.. vs hexam... is another.  The chloride counterions dont help.  I am not territorial, yet at least, so if you see issues, there is no problem if you try repairs.  I'll take a look in a day or so.--Smokefoot (talk) 02:47, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Cocamide DEA

message: This article gives the impression that two august bodies have evaluated data to conclude that it is carcinogenic. This is not the case: Incorporation in Proposition 65 list is automatic following the classification by IARC as a carcinogen. 79.141.9.60 (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

message: Anyone who takes the time to check the source given for "safety concerns" in this article will see that Cocamide DEA is listed as a possible carcinogen in California Proposition 65, a list of WATER SAFETY concerns. In other words, they're saying that it's dangerous IF YOU DRINK IT. There's nothing in that proposition about using it topically, or about shampoo. That needs to be clarified; otherwise, it's fear mongering.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.156.9.68 (talk) 20:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Info 

message: See
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=allintitle%3A+Cocamide+DEA&btnG=Search
--222.64.27.166 (talk) 06:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The item safety..... 

message: please add CAS number and synonyms to the article
http://books.google.com/books?id=hKjcAAAACAAJ&dq=International+Cosmetic+Ingredient+Dictionary&source=gbs_book_other_versions_r&cad=4
--222.67.204.248 (talk) 02:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could anyone who can access to the following info....
Talk:Alfred Agache (painter)

message: I noticed that there was a discrepancy between the date provided for the awarding of the Legion of Honour award (Knight rank), by the two supporting references that I found. The original source I found, albeit not a primary source, indicated that the date on which Alfred Agache was awarded his Knight in france's Legion of Honour was 1895. When I checked the Léonore Database, in France’s National Archives, the original certificates indicate the date of conferral for the Knight rank was 1899, however, additionally they also go on to indicate that Alfred Agache received a further promotion to an Officer rank on 1910. Naturally, I took the Lénoure Database quoted year, as it was a more detailed primary source, compared to the Ary Jan Art Gallery, which is a reputable but second-hand source. 
<BR><BR>
I am starting this discussion thread here to alert everyone to the discrepancy, and the possible confusion that might result from the apparent inconsistency. I would love to hear feedback on what people think about this, and the approach that I took. SMargan (talk) 05:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date Inconsistency
Talk:Cocamidopropyl betaine

message: IUPAC Name replaced--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IUPAC

message: Is it carcinogenic? Badagnani (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carcinogenicity 

message: Liquid soaps produced by E. H. Bronner include the ingredient coco-betaine. Is that the same as this compound? In the company's literature, "coco-betaine" is described as a foaming agent created by combining coconut fatty acids with betaine). Badagnani (talk) 20:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried a liquid castile soap before. It was very drying. Coco-betaine is a different ingredient but it has its own set of problems such as skin dermatitis. --MotherAmy 06:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

text: "Coco betaine" can refer to "cocamidopropyl betaine", but it can also refer to "Coco betaine", which is the betaine derived from the reaction between coco amine and sodium monochloroacetate. The terminology in the surfactant industry isn't always standardized, so without seeing the CAS Number, it's difficult to know for certain.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.135.148.173 (talk) 07:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in products by [[E. H. Bronner]]

message: Does the "-propyl" suffix indicate that a petrochemical is used in the process of making this compound? Badagnani (talk) 20:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.171.66 (talk) 00:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "-propyl"  suffix 

message: This article goes deep into complexity but makes no attempt to inform the reader what the thing is made of. Very easy to add. Not very helpful outside a lab. ~ R.T.G 20:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is misleading to claim it is made from coconut oil when it is mostly made from chemicals. --MotherAmy 06:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jargon Nonsense 

message: Perhaps Wikipedia should mention the following information?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8811135/
The aim of the present clinical double-blind crossover study was to investigate the effect of two different toothpaste detergents, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and cocoamidopropyl betaine (CAPB), as compared with a detergent-free paste, on 30 patients with frequent occurrences of recurrent aphthous ulcers. The study consisted of three 6-week periods during which the patients brushed twice daily with the different test toothpastes. The localization and number of new ulcers were assessed. A significantly higher frequency of aphthous ulcers was demonstrated when the patients brushed with an SLS- than with a CAPB-containing or a detergent-free placebo paste. An SLS-free toothpaste may thus be recommended for patients with recurrent aphthous ulcers.
217.140.211.251 (talk) 18:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia doesn't report on single studies but instead waits for review articles. See WP:MEDRS for details. MrOllie (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toothpaste safety: Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), vs cocoamidopropyl betaine (CAPB)
Talk:Edouard Cortès

message: There is an error in the artist's first name. Édouard should be Edouard -- no accent on the 'E' Howard L. Rehs (talk) 14:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick google search shows quite a few seemingly reliable sources    saying otherwise.  Based on your edits to your business' page, I would assume you to be an expert, so you should be able to provide some WP:RS that can clear this up.  Toddst1 (talk) 01:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In the end, it does not matter to me, I was just trying to correct the error. I you want to base your decision on inaccurate information that is up to you. If you do a real search you will find Verdier's site, or ours, which will give you the correct spelling. There is no accent on the E of Edouard. The only accents are in the middle and last name. Howard L. Rehs (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Tendentious editing#Expecting others to find sources for your own statements. Toddst1 (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just realized you flagged this as a conflict of interest. That made me laugh. I am curious how trying to correct an error in spelling of someone's name falls under a conflict of interest? My only 'interest' is seeing that the information is corrected. Also, look at https://www.edouardcortes.org/vol1/index_en.php -- this is the current expert's site. No accent on the E in his first name. If that does not help, then just leave the incorrect first name. Howard L. Rehs (talk) 01:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need someone to make this change 

message: This painter should not be labeled a Postimpressionist. He was born in 1882, so his career probably didn't begin until the early twentieth century, at which point Postimpressionism is a movement of the past. Postimpressionism actually dates to the early 1880s (when this man was born) and its most notable practitioners (Gauguin, Van Gogh, and Seurat) were born between 1848 and 1859. His style is closer to that of Impressionism; I suspect he's been labeled a Postimpressionist in only the broadest sense of the term, meaning that he's working chronologically after the period of Impressionism. At any rate, there are no scholarly references to his biography or list of major museums that own his works.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nedhartley (talk • contribs) 15:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article has serious issues
Talk:Congo red

message: Henry Armstrong stated that he believed that Congo Red was first made by Peter Griess, who had discussed it with Heinrich Caro and Martius of BASF. See: "Chemical Industry and Carl Duisberg.", Henry Armstrong, Nature, 1935, 135(3425), 1021–1025. doi:10.1038/1351021a0 
AdderUser (talk) 07:44, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: First section says use is abandoned, then later it documents that it's still used in histology. 146.191.95.1 (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory 

message: The para on Congo blue doesn't seem to have much to do with Congo red— it doesn't even say whether they're related beyond the name. I think it should move into its own article. Marnanel (talk) 11:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congo blue