lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Sky Is Falling

message: In the version I know, Foxy Loxy simply doesn't believe the others and takes them inside his cave where they all watch a news report on TV which states, quite clearly, that the falling acorns are NOT to be mistaken for falling skies. --67.172.99.160 20:37, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Much of this article seems to be exactly the same as the first reference - http://www.the-real-story.com/chickenlittle/ which states that "All content is Copyright © of The Real Story 2005"
Who copied who?
Stoive 01:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point - a bunch of stuff was added by an anon a couple of weeks ago. I reverted (hopefully) all of it. - DavidWBrooks 11:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status of text? 

message: This is probably not any version of the fable name. It's a derivation for a food chain name, note "Licken" -> "Licking". I have corrected this (possibly surreptitious advertising) by redirecting and fixing links. The restaurant can now be found under its own name, and it points here, but not the other way around. --Janke | Talk 10:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicken Licken? 

message: The idiom, of the sky falling, is based on the notion (which turns out to be nearly universal among scientifically naive cultures) that the world had a solid ceiling. I think it would do for this dab to link to firmament or, better still, toward any content on the idiom specifically, but such a link doesn't quite fit into any of the categories that the links are currently grouped into. Cesiumfrog (talk) 13:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idiom
Talk:Australian Breastfeeding Association

message: I submitted an original article written by me using Jill Day's book as a reference. Nothing was actually copied.  I am not sure whether I had the website link right.  It should be http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au
Lesley McBurney
:copyvio tag removed, no copyright violation found. --Duk 14:47, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Parsons code

message: I am not sure why the user Fwv thought that the last change (link to the relatively new Musipedia article) should be removed. To me, it seems like he or she did not spend too much time looking at the Parsons Code article. Does it really make sense to remove the reference to the Wikipedia article about Musipedia, but not the external reference to Musipedia? IMO, both kinds of links make sense since Parsons Code is central to Musipedia, and Musipedia is 'the' main application of Parsons Code. Fwv seems to be a vandal, but one with a lot of Wikipedia experience (unlike me), so I am not going to start correcting his corrections. But I want to point out his or her pointless vandalism.
:Musipedia uses Parsons code, but I didn't think it helped describe the code per se, so I added it in a "See also" section at the end. Also, remember to assume good faith.
------------
"Limitations" section is needed, with respect to intervals, durations, etc,.
b0Rn2bL8 (talk) 12:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

message: Does the article really need eight examples? We've just explained exactly how it works - eight examples don't really make it any clearer than one or two, and we don't have room to catalogue every tune in existence ... I'd propose cutting it back to four or fewer. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 14:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:Hello! (magazine)

message: reqphoto removed since there is already a picture.
If you want to restore it, make a more specific request.
--84.20.17.84 16:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reqphoto

message: In Hello!'s article, it was mentioned that the Mexican edition of ¡Hola! started in 2006, with the edition from Spain sold in Mexico prior to that date. However, in ¡Hola!'s article, it mentioned that the magazine was founded in Mexico in 1944. Which is correct? -- azumanga 16:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction with ''[[¡Hola!]]''
Talk:Undersquare

message: Why is the Iron Duke here? It has a 4-inch bore and 3-inch stroke (according to it's page), which is most decidely oversquare.--Sable232 04:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iron Duke? 

message: Stock US Acura Integra GSR from 94-01 came with a B18C1 engine, 81mm bore and 87mm stroke. RS/LS/GS cars came with a B18B1, 81mm bore and 89mm stroke. While both are undersquare engines according to this article, the B18C1 is decidedly not undersquare in its behavior, making peak torque at 6,200 rpm, peak horsepower at 7,600 rpm, and hitting an 8,100 rpm redline. US Acura Integra Type-R with its B18C5 had the same 81mm bore and 87mm stroke, but pushes the powerband even higher with peak torque at 7,000 rpm, peak horsepower at 8,000 rpm, and an 8,400 rpm redline.
Not sure of all the details, but the Japanese Prelude Type-S managed a 7,500 redline with an 87mm bore and 90.7mm stroke. US 1992-1996 Prelude Si with its H23A1 had an 87mm bore and 95mm stroke.
Non performance oriented Honda undersquare engines include the B20B and B20Z (CRV) with 84mm bore and 89mm stroke, and any D series engine from the Civic line (D17A1 from 2001-2005 Civic DX/LX with 75mm bore and 94.4mm stroke for example).
I think the last paragraph from the article needs to be changed. Nowadays, undersquare engines tend to be quite rare, but this form of engine is still used in some applications. With every Civic from 1987 until 2005 except for the 1999-2000 Civic Si having an undersquare engine, they don't seem all that rare to me.
Jeremymatsuoka 22:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honda undersquare engines
Talk:Wolf 424

message: The following paper conflicts with the masses that were apparently copied from the SolStation site:
* Heintz, W. D., "The Substellar Masses of WOLF:424", ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYS. V.217, NO.1/2 JUN(II), P. 145, 1989.
So it is unclear which is correct. — RJH 20:54, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's another: "approximately 0.14 solar masses (63 Jupiters (0.060 solar masses))...approximately 0.13 solar masses (52 Jupiters (0.050 solar masses))" Now, I can't tell if that means Jupiter =.05-06 MSol, or if the Wolf dwarf(s) are, or what. And if it's Jupiter meant, why is there variability in the conversion? A clarification, with source, by somebody who understands this, is definitely required.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  09:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict

message: I could find nothing to corroborate this paragraph, so I removed it from the article:
:Due to its proximity and fast motion towards the Sun, Wolf 424 will brighten by more than 2% over the course of the 21st century. In approximately 7700 years, it will make its nearest approach at a distance of about 1 light year and passing through the distant reaches of the solar system, and will become the nearest stars.
Since it lacks a HIP number, I don't believe this star was even measured by the Hipparcos satellite.–RJH (talk) 15:22, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wolf 424 was reported to have a huge radial velocity towards Earth, just under 600 km/s, IIRC. Since it's now 2 km/s, I gather there's some massive error somewhere. -- KarlHallowell (talk) 15:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close approach 
Talk:Renato Canova

message: I dont think Renato Canova relates in terms of Harry Potter--Tm1000 01:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To the IP editors who keep adding links to Harry Potter magic articles- If the articles you linked to actually made any mention, specifically, of "Renato Canova" then the link might stand a chance of being left in. Until then, it has no apparent relevance whatsoever to this article, which is about a sports coach, so it will be removed. MorganaFiolett (talk) 12:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Potter
Talk:Panasonic DVX100

message: The title of this page ("Panasonic DVX-100") needs to be changed.  "DVX-hyphen-100" is a common mistyping of the camera's actual name, the AG-DVX100.  It is often referred to as the "DVX100" or just the "DVX," but in any case, "DVX-100" is wrong, and for searchability reasons as well as as accuracy, it needs to be corrected. (anonymous edit by 71.68.47.5)
:I've checked this and Panasonic agrees. I've moved the page. Thanks, anonymous contributer! (By the way, you've edited before, create an account, it's much easier for all of us that way!) :-) Peter S. 00:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Title
Talk:Interstate 515

message: Should perhaps something be mentioned that because the southern section is now I-11, the highway is actually now a bypass and not a spur -- and in fact has the 'wrong' number as a consequence as well. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No, since none of those statements are accurate. It still spurs off of I-15, but just happens to end (for now) at an interchange with other interstates. It's not a bypass, as there is no other logical direct freeway connection between its endpoints. And 515 still fits within the interstate numbering conventions.  LJ ↗ 15:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a spur anymore.... 

message: There’s a report that highway officials identified the US 95 central corridor alternative as the preferred route for I-11 through the Las Vegas Valley. This affects I-515 because it is concurrent with US 95 for its entire length, and if it’s officially approved, then I-515 will mostly likely be replaced by I-11. 
Should this be mentioned in the article? KevinML (talk) 02:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably fine to mention that NDOT has selected the I-515/US 95 alignment as the preferred alternative for I-11. If chosen, I-515 would likely be renumbered to I-11 (given the renumbering of I-515 south of I-215), but that tidbit may not be supported by references. -- LJ ↗ 14:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speaking of I-11…
Talk:Oversquare

message: I added some extra information. Hopefully it went correctly...
Anonamous engine enthusiast 23.8.2005 (Day)(month)(year)
----
I speak cautiously because I'm not an engine designer, but it seems to me that oversquare engines have their uses.  Many statements in this article seem to be from a passenger-car perspective only, which gives the article an unnecessary bias.  I would like to see someone with knowledge of other applications (marine, aviation, stationary, etc.) edit this article to remove that bias and more fully explore the trade-offs between different bore:stroke ratios.
Tedd 16:39, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps several articles should be merged into one dealing with the whole bore-to-stroke ratio issue.  Long-stroke engines generally develop greater torque, while short-stroke engines can run faster. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 18:00, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Endangered languages

message: This list of endangered languages is a real good thing but I think that would be interesting to have a kind of worldmap next to it in order to locate the languages more easily. The idea is the following: You're interested in European endangered languages, so, you simply have a look at the map to see which endangered languages you can find in Europe and once you've picked one up, you simply click on it in the list. What do you think?
:Sounds good, however, there are simply too much endangered languages to put on one worldmap, especially in some other parts of the world like the Americas or Africa. You might like List of endangered languages For a start. — mark ✎ 08:22, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Some of the languages included in this category, and its sub-categories, are not endangered, they are extinct and subject to revival attempts. A case in point is Cornish. These revived languages should not be included here. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 20:26, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree Lyndaship (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: False basis for inclusion in this list
Talk:Olive oil extraction

message: This page is very nearly verbatim to:
http://www.oliveoiltimes.com/olive-oil-basics/world/the-way-we-were/85
Who is plagiarizing who? There's no credit given on either page to the other, no Creative Commons on Olive Oil Source, etc. Either Wikipedia needs to take this page down pending an original page, or someone should be getting on OliveOil Times' ass... Mikalra (talk) 21:48, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism To or From Olive Oil Times

message: I've added this image to show graphically the whole process of the modern method of olive oil extraction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccldlllng (talk • contribs) 18:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upload of a new image 
Talk:List of Canadian provinces and territories by area

message: Why is Total Area at the very bottom? --JimWae 03:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: 1 mile = 1.6km, so how is it possible that the area values given in Square Miles are all less than half of the areas given in Square Kilometres? For example, if Canada's total area is 9,984,670km squared, it's total area in miles squared should be 6,240,419mi squared. The actual value given is 3,855,171mi squared.Gh0ti-2 (talk) 15:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because 1 square mile = 2.589 square kilometres; this is because 1.6 has to be squared (1.62=2.6) when discussing area (hence the term square km / mi). You will then find that the math works out quite well. Arsenikk (talk) 17:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha. Thanks for clearing that up - Maths never was my strong suit. Gh0ti-2 (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This table makes no sense 

message: Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but surely each of the provinces (other than Alberta and Saskatchewan) have coastal waters that fall within their boundaries?  Or is water below the low-tide mark "federal" only?  Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 05:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Territorial waters belong to Canada, which is to say "The Queen in Right of Canada" (a.k.a. the federal government). Provinces have no jurisdiction starting at the high water mark. It's a strange concept for us "Central Canadians" inasmuch as we have huge inland waterways which are patrolled by the OPP and Sûreté du Québec, as well as Coast Guard, RCMP and CBSA where they form the border (and corresponding US agencies, of course). 76.66.87.21 (talk) 16:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coastal waters 

message: I am Roberto456 and I removed the Mistakes from this article: List of provinces and territories in Canada by area.Please
go to the talk page now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.168.113 (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes
Talk:History of astronomy

message: Article seems to think geocentric models are evil, which is silly, and seems to blame Ptolemy for inventing them, which is false, and seems to misunderstand the history of astronomy, and then blames unnamed historians for these ahistorical statements. All to dismiss arguably the most important astronomer for thousands of years.
Regarding the geocentric model, unless you believe the ancient Greeks were launching spacecraft to explore other planets, it was 100% irrelevant if the "center of the universe" was the Earth or Sun. (...both of which are wrong, BTW, as the sun orbits the center of the galaxy. Though, in a way, every point is the center of the universe, so geocentrism was also right). They are simply different frames of reference for the same thing, and the math works out exactly the same. There was no way to test which one was "right" until millennia later. Thus, with exactly zero input on the subject by science, and exactly zero real-world importance, it came down to a guess based on philosophy.
To say Ptolemy corrupted all astronomy because he didn't make a non-scientific guess on an irrelevant subject the right way seems absurd. It seems like saying Newton was "the acme of corruption of physics" because he guessed wrong about how many angles could dance on the head of a pin.
Anyway, if you want to trash Ptolemy, talk about his plagiarism of data he claimed to record... hundreds of years before he was born. Or problems and solutions he copied... poorly. Skintigh (talk) 03:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acme of corruption? WTF? 

message: I don't understand this revert. It is merely placing the context in which the study of astronomy first started, and it is referenced even if most of the things pointed are quite obvious (after all, Wikipedia:You do need to cite that the sky is blue). Which is the "opinion"? Cambalachero (talk) 00:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The starting point
Talk:Indo-Aryan peoples

message: the brahmin ethnic group all around india are speakers and bearers of the indo aryan language sanskrit since their very first migration from the banks of the river saraswati in modern day kashmir and haryana. they deserve a mention in this article as well. Temporary 1010 (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  the brahmin ethnic group are indo aryan
Talk:Blessed Trinity Catholic High School

message: Blessed trinity catholic high school should be moved to Blessed Trinity Catholic High School --Doc (?) 21:30, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Also removed text copied from [www.bttitans.org/shandbook0203.pdf]. Loganberry (Talk) 22:56, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Thanks, would have moved it myself - but the creator was still busy editing it --Doc (?) 23:41, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Why was that completely deleted? In Athletics isn't it make sense to have who are the Athletes attributed with the program? 'Scaper | ŴööđÇüŦŦëř (talk) 15:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Althletes

message: As Blessed Trinity continues to add more inductees to its Athletic Hall of Fame, this article should be updated to for others to see the accomplishments! Seems a little outdated to not add that in! MarkOG (talk) 21:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athletic Hall of Fame 

message: The ""Fast Start For An Ancient Faith" (PDF). Roswell Beacon. Retrieved 2007-02-18." Link is broken! Needs to be fixed! MarkOG (talk) 21:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link! 

message: I added some new information to the fine arts section. If someone could take a look and make sure it is alright that would be great! Kajohn14 (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Fine Arts
Talk:Gideon Mantell

message: I'm afraid the article at present does not give an adequate account of Richard Owen's evildoing against Mantell, important because of Owen's position in the evolution debate, and Mantell's position in palaeontology. If no-one else takes it up, I will in due course. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mantell and Owen 

message: Maybe this is not trivial. The first tooth that his wife found is kept in Wellington, New Zealand. It is said by someone who should know -- in a very interesting science-talk (Gideon is mentioned). http://miscellaneous-sonstiges.blogspot.com/2010/02/first-fossil-in-new-zealands-te-papa.html 203.100.214.164 (talk) 10:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Fossil Tooth 

message: The portrait shown doesn't look anywhere near the ones of Mantell that I know, but like one of this guy (http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Rudolph_Thorbecke). Look at this portrait from the Dutch Wikipedia for comparison (http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestand:Gideon_Mantell.jpg) --Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 07:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: It says he discovered four dinosaurs total, only two are mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.176.114.76 (talk) 18:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaur discovery's 
Talk:Hume's principle

message: Sparing the gory details, I find Frege's work (Sense and Reference) to be philosophically naive.  I often wondered how Frege could possibly espouse a theory of meaning so obviously at odds with Kant without some defense of his theory vis a vis Kant.  
So the comment that Frege had "probably never read Hume" leads me to wonder if Frege ever read Kant.  If Frege never read either Hume or Kant, isn't analytical philosophy, of which Frege is one of the "fathers", in some sense an illegitimate child? Can whoever wrote this page include some more details regarding Frege's philosophical background?
Thanks in advance,
hemlockStreet@gmail.com
That information is likely to be found on the page for Gottlob Frege.  I would also recommend J. Alberto Coffa's book "The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap to the Vienna Station".--138.251.242.34 (talk) 12:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julius Baumann? 

message: Why would a supposedly important principle be stated using nonsense words Fs and Gs. And why would anybody care about them? Visibly Hume never mentioned them. So maybe the intro to this article should be restated in a meaningful way. Marc van Leeuwen (talk) 12:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fs and Gs?? 
Talk:Coyoacán

message: The text says Coyoacán was home to Dolores del Río, Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera, and also to Leon Trotsky (Лeв Трóцкий), and the houses they lived in are now both museums.
"Both" is confusing, as the sentence appears to refer to three units: two individuals and a married couple.  I know Kahlo's childhood home, later shared by her and Rivera, is a museum.  Is the other museum Trotsky's or del Rio's house? AmyinNoCal (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont remember writing that nor can I find it. Only Frida's and Trotsky's houses are museums. Del Rio's is still a private residence. Please fix. Thanks...Thelmadatter (talk) 00:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: never mind, I see this was written last April.Thelmadatter (talk) 00:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museums? 
Talk:Show trial

message: The section for Japan talks about it's conviction rates and gives two examples of previous rulings, but nowhere does it mention how all of that is related to the article's main topic. Is it implying that high conviction rates are a result of every trial being of a predetermined outcome? I mean, it should be clearly mentioned what is that entails the high conviction rates. Is it the judges/judicial system's preconceptions or the forced confessions obtained by the police? If so, how does that make every trial a show trial?
Furthermore, the last paragraphs are taken directly from Criminal justice system of Japan, which makes it all the more obvious that there hasn't been a lot of work done to the section to justify their relevance to the main topic of the article. I'm torn between rewriting the whole thing or deleting it entirely, but I think there's potential for improvement, so it'd be greatly appreciated if any editor with more knowledge on the topic could make it clear about how show trials are somehow linked to the Japanese judicial system. I'll take another look in the future if I have time, but I think more examples of concrete trials would be necessary to keep the section relevant. NicoSkater97 (let's talk!) 22:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the section entirely per WP:NOR, as it seemed that a complete rewrite was necessary to make the section relevant to the topic of this article. The term "show trial" is mainly used in the context of political persecution, which is irrelevant to Japan's corrupt judicial system. 2602:FC24:13:1:E4F7:9065:0:1 (talk) 04:25, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan 

message: The article for the Adolf Eichmann trial states that the event was televised internationally and that this was for propaganda value. If a reliable source states that the Adolf Eichmann's guilt was presumed beforehand, shall we include his trial as an example of a show trial in the article's See Also? 72.24.227.225 (talk) 07:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adolf Eichmann Trial