Talk:Rayquaza

message: Please fact check 
:The signature attack line doesn't even work...and please specify what you want 'fact-checking' as that link provides no help whatsoever. Double Dash 12:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fact check 

message: I removed a very poorly worded confusing sentence, "They are said to descend from the ozone layer if Kyogre and Groudon were to fight, in order to break up the feud and maintain the balance of nature." from the end of the biological characteristics section.  If anyone has any idea what this sentence was supposed to say, please fix it and put it back in. -Jaardon 10:23, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um...I find it pretty obvious. When Kyogre and Groudon fight, they come down to break it up.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 15:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence 

message: I have remade the article, this time with real-world information and reliable sources. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 15:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great, but I would suggest merging the Notes and References. No reason to have them separate. Blake (Talk·Edits) 15:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version of article 

message: While I'm not really a stickler for an article having short reception, especially considering Rayquaza has definitely been noticed, being on the cover of a game and being in a movie, but I don't think it's quite big enough. I mean, maybe if it had some mention in books the way Mr. Mime and Koffing and Weezing have, but it relies on a few sources, most of them being IGN. If anyone disagrees, then I hope they also will fix the problems. To me, it just kind of stands out amongst the other articles, definitely lacking something the others have. No disrespect to the editors of the article, but as it stands, I think Bulbasaur in its current state could hold an article more firmly than Rayquaza. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 08:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't throw a fit if it was merged, but I don't really support it, since it seems fine. I mean, its lasted this long. Blake (Talk·Edits) 23:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm more leaning towards support. It doesn't feel like there's enough weight, or enough material, to really warrant a character article.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 19:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think, bottom-line, there is enough here to satisfy the general notability guide. But, hey, I'm obviously biased about this, so, I guess this comment is predictable. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That book mention helped a little, but it still needs further content. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 07:16, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Yeah so I'm just going to note here, NO legendary disappears if you lose to it, only if it loses to you.
Check the games if you want proof.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.201.80 (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are very right sir; thank you for pointing the error out. In the future, feel free to be bold and fix errors yourself! :D かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 16:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: In accordance with WP:YOUTUBE, I just want to clarify that the video I recently used as a source for this article is not a copyright violation. As per reliable third-party source Polygon: "However, uploading game content with voice-over is not the same as uploading a TV show. The producer is playing the game and manipulating it. He or she can claim 'fair use' of the content, especially if the video is a critique or a report." The video I included was indeed game content with voice-over. TheTiksiBranch (talk) 20:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Source