Talk:Jack Napier (actor)

message: Why is this letter still up? Shouldn't someone remove it and incorporate the information in the letter into the article itself? ERADEKator 02:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the quick answer to that is be bold and do it yourself. However, the long answer is that we really prefer to write our articles from verifiable materials, not just a letter from someone claiming to be JN. Verifiable means we need something that someone else can look up - a book, a magazine, a web page. AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Letter 

message: I'm deleting/altering some of the sections that most gratuitously violate the NPOV.  Super Jedi Droid is totally right about this thing; it's written almost to sound stupid. Dkostic 17:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV edits 

message: A big chunk of this article appears to be lifted directly from here: .  I'm deleting the offending sections.  Dkostic 17:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent Copyright Infringement 

message: This article is in desperate need of expansion with information from reliable sources. If you care to help in this, please do so; if you care to help develop other aticles, please see WP:P*#Articles. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 16:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion required 

message: Moved from brenneman's talk 
*Edit removing links
You removed most of the external links from this article, commenting this was per WP:External links. I restored, and want to discuss. I am not sure which part of that those links would contradict; since it's an article about a porn star, presumably "tasteful" must be interpreted within the context. :-). Also the reason the article was kept around rather than removed by PROD is due to the actor's >100 film appearances, so linking to a list of those appearances would seem to be required. AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *chuckle* I have no idea what "tasteful" means.  I wear stripes with spots.  But with regards to this, per the guideline, the removed links do not "provide a unique resource."  If there is one in particular that anyone feels should be replaced, I'm happy to discuss it here. - brenneman {L}  00:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Now, I realize this is an article about a porn star, but it reads like an ad for a (very) cheesy porn convention biopic.  Can someone figure out how to reword this without ruining it? Super Jedi Droid 06:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewording? 

message: The information in this article is used as criterion for inclusion in the list at Human penis size#Men famous for their large penis as well as :Category:Men with unusually large penis. Now, more than 50 names have been included, and there have been objections raised strong enough that both the list and the category are currently targeted for deletion. Placing this posting uniformly on the talk pages of the articles concerned, I would firstly encourage editors to make sure reliable sourcing is provided to support the claims regarding penis size. Secondly, editors might wish to involve themselves in the discussions taking place at Talk:Human penis size and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. __meco 13:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with penis size information

message: An RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  (actor)/(pornographic actor) RfC