lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Languages of Italy

message: Would an administrator add Franco-Provençal language to the main Category page here. (It is only listed under sub-category.) Thanks. Charvex 09:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Language 

message: Should we add Venetian to this list, or is it already in the category called "Languages of Italy by region"?ACEOREVIVED (talk) 11:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about Venetian
Talk:Monetary base

message: It appears that this page had a great deal of redundant material on it.
- The text on this page itself implies that "monetary base" is simply a 
definition of term, which is
equivalent to "M0".  (See Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)
A much better and more complete discussion of the
"equation" for
the different M levels appears where it should be - on the Money Supply
page.
- This page also had an incomplete summary discussion of "expansionary policy",
which was taken verbatim from investopedia.  The subject is expanded
in much greater detail on monetary policy.  A reference was given 
instead to the existing article
expansionary policy.
(Both of these topics are discussed on the "Overlap" section within
Help:Merging and moving pages#Merging)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iiigoiii (talk • contribs) 22:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page overlapped significantly with [[Money Supply]] 

message: I have deleted the section "Alternative Views" because it does not refer to the monetary base but to the money multiplier. The section also appears to be nonsensical: If you define the terms monetary base and money multiplier, both non-zero, there certainly exists a ratio which is called money multiplier. To print in bold face that such a multiplier does not exist seems really strange. There may be important religious or political reasons to deny the existence of a mere ratio but these have no place in a decent dictionary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herbert81 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative views 

message: The intro uses the term "total currency circulating in the public". Does this refer to physical coins and banknotes?
Yes, known as M0. MB is M0 plus reserves held at the central bank.
or is electronic money held in checking accounts also included? 
No. Checking accounts are demand deposits which are part of M1.
How about money held in a savings account? 
No. It depends on the type of savings account. If funds are available on demand, then they're part of M1, else they're part of M2.
I tried to look at the article currency for help, but it did not clarify the situation, since three different definitions are given there. AxelBoldt (talk) 22:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question of definition 

message: The last line of the intro section reads: "The monetary base should not be confused with the money supply, which consists of the total currency circulating in the public plus certain types of non-bank deposits with commercial banks."
Does "non-bank deposits with commercial banks" mean deposits at commercial banks that have been deposited by non-bank entities?  (E.g., ruling out deposits at commercial banks that were deposited by other banks?)
Is there an easy way to make this clear in the sentence? 
2607:FEA8:C260:200:4141:AEB3:A9E8:8A60 (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question/Clarification re "non-bank deposits"
Talk:Interorbital scales

message: We've got to come up with a better image for this article than one that marks the wrong scales. Yes, if it's clear what they are if you read the image caption, but certainly not at first glance. --Jwinius 11:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't you make one the same way? Regards, AshLin 12:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but first I have to find a good picture. The number of intersupraoculars is determined by taking the shortest route between the supraocular scales: that's what we'd want to show. However, most images don't resolve these small scales well enough to do that. In addition, the usual drab colors make them even even more difficult to distinguish. Mind you, it wasn't easy finding those images for the labial and circumocular scales either. --Jwinius 12:57, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Gaijin/Archive 8

message: I have a problem with the following:
:The meaning of gaijin in Japanese society—and the question of who constitutes a gaijin—is explored in depth in the 2006 movie, The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift''
I haven't actually seen the movie, but it just doesn't strike me as the deep, social comentary type of movie. I could be wrong, but I kinda doubt there really is an "in-depth exploration of the term 'gaijin' " in that movie. If we're gonna include movies, I'd much rather see an inclusion of Swallowtail Butterfly here - it's been years since I saw that, and yet the only scene I remember clearly is the plight of the white guy who was born and raised in Japan and could only speak Japanese, complaining about being labeled a gaijin and being addressed in English all the time. That does make for a social comentary of the term in my book. TomorrowTime 10:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fast and the Furious?
Talk:Lee–Jackson Day

message: This article needs to be expanded to include the FACT that Lee-Jackson Day while not an officially observed holiday in all of the Southern States is still celebrated and observed none the less by the citizens of each State on January 19 of each year. Only Virginia celebrates Lee-Jackson Day on the Friday before MLK Day, everyone else does it on the 19th (Lee's Birth date).
For example I live in Tampa, FL and all across our area their are BBQ's and festivals to mark this Southern Holiday. My cousin lives in Atlanta, GA and they have 3 parades for Lee 7 Jackson and the Stone Mt. Park has a major event to honor them.
This article is written to belittle the holiday as a "fringe" holiday celebrated by a small group of people when its really a major Southern Holiday.
6r3yf0x (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lee-Jackson Day IS Celebrated Dixie Wide 
Talk:Dean Magee

message: So it looks like this talk page existed since 2007 and was probably originally attached to an article about the ice hockey player, whose info can be found at: https://icehockey.fandom.com/wiki/Dean_Magee
The Dean J. Magee who is the Facebook person seems to be a different person altogether. I think a separate article should be created for the ice hockey player.  I would appreciate other people's thoughts. Thanks --FeanorStar7 12:54, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Dean Magees
Talk:Frequency divider

message: "... the amplifier gain at the half frequency must be greater than unity. The phase shift must also be an integer multiple of 2pi." should probably be suppressed.
If you are trying to make a oscillator out of a linear amplifier then, at the frequency of oscillation, the loop gain must be greater than unity and the phase must be an integer multiple of 2pi.  In fact, the oscillator finds the frequency at which the phase is a multiple of 2pi.  If you adjust the components, the frequency changes.  If you want some particular precise frequency you have to adjust the components very carefully.  The Regenerative frequency divider is a highly non-linear circuit.  Phase in the sense of the linear amplifier doesn't mean anything.  You don't have to carefully tune the filter.  You can vary the filter and as long as you don't vary it too much, the  output frequency won't change.  The filter is usually a band pass filter.Constant314 (talk) 02:12, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing this unsourced material.  The citation request has been on the material over a year.Constant314 (talk) 03:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed, Regenerative frequency divider 
Talk:List of largest ferries of Europe

message: In which units are the tonnages listed, gross tons, gross register tons or something else? Also, if the amounts have been copied from various Wiki articles, I have to point out some articles list the tonnage in GRT and some in GT (and contrary to the popular belief, those two aren't the same thing). --Kjet 10:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tonnage

message: Another thing... there should probably be some kind of a guideline on which size of ships should be included on the list. A minimum tonnage/lenght/passenger capacity requirement before a ship would be included on the list. -- Kjet 12:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which ferries should be included?

message: GT 55000, www.fincantieri.it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.18.66.22 (talk) 20:26, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cruise Roma

message: Why only Europe's largest have their list? Just checked the category 'Lists of ferries' and there was not any other "Largest ferries of..." than this. At least one would be suitable: 'Largest ferries of the world'. Or is it really so hard to get facts from elsewhere around the world? I don't think there is no ferries outside Europe, otherwise this article could be named 'of the world'. 82.141.125.149 (talk) 04:30, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europe? 

message: ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.9.101.150 (talk) 03:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no Prince Charles? 
Category talk:British radio DJs

message: I propose that DJs should be put into the appropriate subcategories and removed from this parent category. So, Jeremy Vine should not be in this parent category as well as being in :category:BBC Radio 2 DJs. The main reason for this is that having over 200 members in this category you have to scroll to the next page to find the other subcategories which could be misleading.
I did some work here a couple of years ago to try and sort this out but although the articles have improved the categorisation is still a mess. --Vince 10:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category too large
Talk:Brille

message: Can someone more knowledgeable confirm that Ecdysis is the correct term for snakes?  It may only be correct for insects.  According to the Talk:Ecdysis page, "Moulting is used for arthropods and ecdysozoans in general, but my understanding is that ecdysis is one special form of moulting seen in members of the superphylum Ecdysozoa (including Arthropods and Nematodes". It was somewhat confusing to be sent to the Ecdysis page from here since it focuses on insects only.  Duane Johnson (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct Terminology?
Talk:840th Air Division

message: As noted in the "references" section, the initial version of this article comes substantially from the AFHRA article on this division.  If anyone has a copyright violation, it's the "ranger95.com" website for scraping the AFHRA and not noting it.  There is no vopyvio - the text is PD, it is the official work of the US Air Force.  Thank you.  - NDCompuGeek 10:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:Multinational Corps Northeast

message: I count 24 countries (maybe I missed one or two in the long list), including the Origin German, Polish and Denmark... but what do the other 21 Countries send to this (seems like) very important most Eastern Europe NATO Headquarters?! If they did not send only 10-50 men pear country it would be far too large for a division, also which weapons do the use or did they used and did the 21 new countries bring any equipment to the Polish HQ for Defense Lines further East?! I only knew about 4 Bataillons which were send to the 3 Baltic States and Poland or Finnland (I think Poland?), with each 1,000 ground forces, infantry equipment (assault rifles, 7.62mm MG's, .50 caliber (12.7mm) larger MG's and mounted on humvees or pickups, hand grenades... for some of the forces maybe even nightscopes. It is more a symbolic act, as Russian troops would kick 1,000 troops in each of the country in the ass, they would have losses too of course, but they would just overrun these states until the states withdraw or standing after a few days of fighting with the back to the Baltic Sea...
Russia is a great Danger, but for example the 4 Bataillons for 4 Countries are really symbolic, even a few full equipped Divisions are far too less to defend East Europe, even with CAS (Close Air Support), I mean the Russians got an Air Force, Rocket Troops (seperated from the Army, means with its own Generals leading them, one of the 7 Russian armed forces). 
Lets hope we will never find out how good a Division of 3 Bataillons in the Baltic States with together 3,000 men would resist an full-scale Russian attack, supported from Kaliningrad, I hope that Putin dies soon..... he is intelligent but crazy, he never could accept the extreme power which was lost when the Soviet Union collapsed, it was "The Big Russian", even though they made only ~50 to 55% of the total population in the Soviet Union... he wants as many parts as possible back, in Armenia he already helped several times, the war between Armenia and Azerbaijan would be a clear thing without Russia... a State with giant oil and natural gas reserves and population of ~9.8 million peoples against Armenia without rich oil or gas, only a bit over 3 million people, and Purchasing power it is 8,500$ per Armenia per Capita, while in Azerbaijan we have 18,000$. The "real" numbers are even much harder, Armenia only had a real nominal GDP of $10.57 billion (2015 est.) and Azerbaijan had $54.05 billion (2015 est.). So how can Armenia stand and defend their positions until the peace came and now Azerbaijan is splitted in 2 parts or an azerbaijan enclave is there but they are still "fighting" (right now only with words) all the time about who should get Bergkarabach... Russia got 50,01% of the whole Armenian Pipeline Network and of the Gas Company which sells Gas to the customers, most in the Capital Area of Jeriwan... Azerbaijan GDP will growth to over 100 billion when oil and gas prices recovered together with increasing natural gas output...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kilon22 (talk • contribs) 12:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  24 Countries for 1 Division?!
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Brunswick

message: Would somebody mind keeping an Salisbury, New Brunswick? There's an editor there who made his account solely to right some wrongs about how the governance reforms were conducted. They've already been blocked once and I don't feel like trying to explain how a village election isn't considered notable enough to put on the page. I suspect they're a member of some sovereign citizen movement; they think a new council could overturn the amalgamation they blame on the sitting mayor. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salisbury, New Brunswick 

message: Hey everyone, I wanted to make this to let any WP:NEWB members know that I have access to https://da.tj.news/, the Telegraph-Journal's newspaper archive, incase anybody would like for me to search for anything. I've been using it to expand upon articles a few times now and I don't mind helping out if somebody would like for me to look up something.
PSA: Just keep in mind that the search function is relatively broken, and searching with quotation marks (example: "Cranberry Sauce On a Plate") doesn't often work. I found a slight workaround that sometimes works by using "%22" (HTML encode for a quotation mark) instead of placing quotation marks around the words I search, but it doesn't always work and sometimes does not showcase all articles with that phrase. Otherwise, I am more than happy to help! B3251 (talk) 17:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspaper Archives 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 06:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]] 

message: A discussion is taking place, which may effect provincial/territorial politician bio leads. GoodDay (talk) 20:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rene Levesque 

message: Would appreciate input at this RFC about Levesque. GoodDay (talk) 21:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  René Lévesque RfC
Talk:PRINTS

message: I work at the particular group that owns, runs and maintains the PRINTS protein family database and I have full permission and right to use any material contained within the PRINTS web pages and publications in order to construct this wikipedia entry.
Ioannis Selimas 10:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, that is not sufficient as anybody can make that claim. Permission needs to be given via email by someone who can attributed to the source. There are instructions for that in the notice on your talk page. Also, the permission needs to be more than just for Wikipedia use. It needs to explicitly state that the material has been released under the GFDL. Wikipedia is published under that license which means it content is usable by anyone as long as they abide by the GFDL. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 12:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert Costanza

message: This article sounds like an auto-biography, banned in Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.51.240 (talk) 11:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an biographical article. Wikipedia has offers tons of those. -- Mdd (talk) 11:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Eppyie is a sock-puppet of Cutler J. Cleveland.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.51.240 (talk) 12:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleveland is a friend of Costanza.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.5.71 (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close 

message: Costanza's opinion on planetary management doesn't seem to be supported by the facts.  Of course, this was published some time ago in 1991 (Ecological Economics).  I'm curious if his position has changed at all. Viriditas (talk) 07:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planetary management 
Category talk:Skepticism

message: Is there any correlation between Skepticism and Critical thinking?  Skepticism is the process of applying reason and critical thinking to determine validity.  Shermer discusses this more thoroughly here: What is a Skeptic? In this video — the fourth in our series of videos that promote science and critical thinking through the use of humor, wit, and satire — we present a fun and informative look at the principles of Skepticism. Xenophrenic (talk) 23:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats not an RS. Regardless this is about Philosophical skepticismApollo The Logician (talk) 15:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Michael Shermer is indeed a reliable source on these matters.  Was that humor, perhaps?  And no, this is not only about "philosophical" skepticism, which is but one of many sub-parts of this subject: Skepticism.  Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 15:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You are confused skepticism in the philsophical context is nothing like scepticism of the new athiest movement. It is only a coincidence that they share the same name. Please educate yourself on a topic before commenting nosense.Apollo The Logician (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: "You are confused skepticism"? "commenting nosense"? Even Google Translator can't tell me what you are trying to say.  My loss, I guess. Xenophrenic (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So you're one of those people huh?Apollo The Logician (talk) 17:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Suzuki GSX1400

message: Sources are unclear about the introduction time of model K2 for the European market. This model was identical to the Japanese March 2001 K1 model, but was targeted at Europe and hence called different. On his website Jarmo Haapamäki mentions that: 'The International sales brochure was printed in April 2001 and the first bikes arrived to shops in Europe in June 2001. The bikes looked the same as the Japanese K1 models but the brochures said it was a 2002-year's K2 model'. Were these first bikes in Europe try out models? Should K2 be put in 2001? Arno-nl (talk) 12:26, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model K2 of 2002 or 2001?
Talk:Nosterfield

message: The reference to GENUKI for parish is really not very good as that is historic ecclesiastical information and not for current civil parish information. It just so happens in this case that the ecclesiastical parish and civil parish have the same name. We really need a reference to the place being in the civil parish now rather than historical information. Keith D (talk) 13:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, have now added A Vison of Britain Through Time link which I hope ia more acceptableGenealogy Jo (talk) 05:03, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Parish
Talk:New South Wales Premier's History Awards

message: This entry is being reformatted during a training session. The State Library of New South Wales is responsible for administrating these awards. The shortlist information will be moved into a new section. Juliana 8 (talk) 01:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing training day
Talk:Scottish Westminster constituencies 1918 to 1950

message: Looks to me like this article should be at "... 1918 to 1950", and one of a series of articles, the next perhaps "... 1950 to 1955", followed by "... 1955 to 1974", "... 1974 to 1983", "... 1983 to 1997", "... 1997 to 2005" and "... 2005 to present".Laurel Bush 11:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move article?
Talk:DFC Prag

message: Would whoever uploaded the other version of this club's logo (the flag), re-up it so I can insert back into the article and add the necessary fair use tags so the the ImageCopz don't delete it again? I neglected to capture a copy of the file ... Thanks. Wiggy! 11:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From the text given it sounds as if Prag was able to play in the championship final without having to qualify at all. If this is the case, this vice-championship should be removed from the team's honours, as they didn't do anything for it. --129.70.15.202 (talk) 10:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They got there through the rules in place at the time, played the match and lost, making them vice-champions. Despite, or maybe because of, the character of Prag's arrival to the final its a noteable part of the history of the game in Germany. Stripping away the honour here doesn't do anything to change the actual history of the event - they still played the match and lost. If they had won, there would cetainly be historical constroversy about their arrival to the final, but you still couldn't strip them of the title of champions. Wiggy! (talk) 13:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1903