Talk:Simulation

message: One topic which I believe should be dealt with separately is Military Simulation, and in particular the history of the military simulation. 67.180.130.220 02:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  One topic 

message: I performed some limited edits of the opening paragraph for (hopefully) somewhat improved clarity and readability. --ThreePD 02:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk items 2006 

message: I went through this article, and while they address some elements of human patient simulation I was unable to find anything substantial and/or significant.  I think we really need to address this as HPS is growing rapidly in health care education.  Im rather new to Wiki, how do I go about starting a new article specifically on HPS?  
Allen Hanberg  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ahanberg (talk • contribs). 
see Help:Starting_a_new_page :-) 89.103.168.25 (talk) 11:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Patient Simulation? - 2007 

message: I think that war games and military simulation are two almost entirely different concepts in that war games require a human-in-the-loop, while military simulation as used by military agencies worldwide consists of modeling a specific scenario in computers, running it and analyzing the results. Could someone look at it please? Avmatso 04:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military Simulation 

message: :Image:EP09 symulator.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:EP09 symulator.jpg

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.184.138.211 (talk) 11:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold text 

message: This article unfortunately seems to attract an ever-growing number of inappropriate external links. I've trimmed the links section right back (and I do mean right back!), and suggest that anyone wishing to add external links carefully read WP:LINKS first. From the guideline, external links "should be kept to a minimum of those that are meritable, accessible and appropriate to the article." It's not the purpose of Wikipedia to promote websites, software, groups or organisations. If you're not sure about the suitability of a link, it can always be proposed here on the talk page for discussion. EyeSerenetalk 17:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I've created a separate page dedicated entirely to medical simulation, examples, applications, and other information regarding the subject. I did my best to adhere to Wikipedia standards, but make no promises to it being exact as I have had no prior article writing experiences with Wikipedia. Any help in cleaning up mistakes that I may have made is appreciated. In addition, perhaps it would be best to merge some of the medical knowledge from this page into my new page? Also, the History section is definitely lacking and I admit that I did not spend much time on that. Jskiles1 (talk) 22:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical Simulation 

message: After careful consideration, almost the entire virtual training article could fit in a heading in Simulation#More examples in different areas.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virtual training 

message: Could someone please explain why "Dream hypothesis" redirects here. I was looking for the Cartesian concept. Does such an article exist?
--852_Charlie_Papa (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It should have been redirected to Simulated reality#Dreaming, and would have been still redirected there, except that someone redirected Simulated reality to Simulation, and a bot followed it.  Fixed now, thanks.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from Dream hypothesis 

message: This topic occurs twice, without good reason, in this article.
The section titled "Simulation and games" should probably be merged with the section "Simulation in entertainment - Examples of entertainment simulation - Computer and video games".
In this section, the example of analog or 'paper' simulation games should probably be explicitly mentioned.  Also, the statement "Moreover, they represent the interactions between the playable characters
and the environment realistically" is too broad in its given context.  A distinction should be made between simulations of the experience of enagaging in an activity (such as driving a car) vs interactive  simulations of the functioning of a system (as in SimCity).  In games that are an interactive model of a system, the player usually does not 'realistically interact' with the environment,  and there may be no 'playable character' as such (a good example of this would be The Sims).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.237.34.64 (talk) 03:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simulation and games 

message: This text was cut from Stimulation. I put it here in case anybody feels like doing something with it in this article. Lova Falk talk 07:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in simulators and simulation technology

message: “See also“ “Grey box completion and validation“ has been removed anonymously without explanation from this and several other topics. Following advice from Wikipedia if there are no objections (please provide your name and reasons), I plan to reinstate the reference in a weeks time. 
The removed reference provides techniques for computer model development as is need for many simulations. In particular most models are incomplete (i.e. a grey box) and thus need completion and validation. This reference seems to be within the appropriate content of the “See also” section see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#See_also_section.
BillWhiten (talk) 05:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re Grey box completion and validation 

message: There is a good overview description of the complexity of CFD simulation of rocket engine combustion, where simulation is required over eight (8) orders of magnitude in time scale, and six (6) orders of magnitude in length.  Fascinating talk at GTC 2015 in the past few weeks:  GPUs to Mars:  Full-scale Simulation of SpaceX's Mars Rocket Engine, Adam Lichtl and Steven Jones, GPU Technology Conference, spring 2015. The approach described in the talk (wavelet/grid adaptation as a means of significantly decreasing storage and compute power required to do a quality CFD simulation of complex and large combustion process like this) might be useful for improving the article.  What's new is that this is being done on standard GPU acceleration chips, massively parallel, at much lower cost, and not really possible on previous processor approaches. Novel approach to doing combustion CFD with low-cost GPUs.  — N2e (talk) 03:40, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complex GPU simulation example 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Simulation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005201455/http://starksravings.com/linktrainer/linktrainer.htm to http://www.starksravings.com/linktrainer/linktrainer.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article represents Wikipedia at its worst. Anyone hoping to gain insight
about simulation will leave this article shaking their heads, wondering what
they have just read.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.156.67.94 (talk) 04:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written and poorly conceived 

message: The bulleted item on 'headphones' is dubious. The conventional approach for 3D Audio headphones is to use an Head-related Transfer FunctionHead-related_transfer_function (HRTF) model. This is not a simulation but an emulation. The HRTF model is emulating the amplification and measurement system that was used to capture the Head-related Impulse Responses (HRIRs). In doing so, it explicitly emulates what would have been captured by the dummy-head microphone if a new sound would have be played on that system at the given location.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.103.139.94 (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aural Display 

message: Simulation, by any dictionary, has nothing to do with science Yoandri Dominguez Garcia 08:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrongly Titled. Should be 'work/science/computer'... 

message: Is there a reason for the order of terms in ? Should the terms be ordered differently, such as alphabetically or some other way? Biogeographist (talk) 04:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about classification and terminology section