Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

message: There are a group of editors leveraging their knowledge of Wikipedia editing that continuously add highly controversial statements in the lead of Alex Epstein's Wikipedia page, which was formerly resolved a year ago discussion on 'Climate Denier' phrasing
. The edit is solely based on single purpose articles various pieces that do not do any secondary sourcing. The daily maverick is not a wikipedia reliable source and the rolling stone article is bascially top 5 climate deniers list that reads like an SEO top ten blog post.
While Slate is considered a reliable source, there are many other reliable sources that negate this piece. So yes there are "Sources" but most if not all of the sources use no secondary sources. These are amounting to Google search preferences.
This has priorly been resolved as Undue weight given to the Biography of a living person. It also can not be seen as a "Fringe" theory as that usually entails self published works; Alex Epstein's works have been published by one of the Big Five in publishing, being Penguin books. Outsellers (talk) 17:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern About BLP Alex Epstein (American writer) 

message: Might one presume Wikipedia is striving  accuracy, clarity, quality, relevance, contextualization, cohesiveness, attention-to-detail, and/or enhancement in the postings if its articles? Apparently not in the matter of "Sduduzo Ka-mbili" [ https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sduduzo_Ka-Mbili ] !
In one fell swoop, NmWTfs85IXusaybq has eviscerated a host of judiciously researched/sourced clarifications, corrections, as well as multiple potentially-enhancing both internal (Wikipedia) and external links.
Then, NmWTfs85IXusaybq inexplicably has reintroduced back onto the article-page originally-posted text which remained rife with all manner of mis-spellings, mis-identifications, mis-translations, mis-perceptions, etc.
Among those mis-spellings, mis-identifications, mis-translations, mis-perceptions are:
Russell and Run Simmonsw / Russell Simons' Foundation / Washington Past / Peterson / United Nation's / Sarafina (The Movie) / Harlem Nutcracker / One of the 25 to Watch / Alvin Ailey American Dance School /Alvin Ailey Repertory Dance Ensemble / Hearst (Magazine company) / Super Stars of Dance / ANC-US / SUNY / My Sorrow
Among the decommissioned internal (Wikipedia) links were:
South Africa / Cape Town / Whoopi Goldberg / New York City / Gordon Parks / European Union / WBAI-FM / New York Times / The Washington Post / The Village Voice / Rolling Stone / Superstars of Dance / Dance Magazine's "25 to Watch" / Africa Day / Sarafina! (film) / Taliep Petersen / David Kramer / Mbongeni Ngema / Donald Byrd (choreographer) / Russell Simmons / O, The Oprah Magazine / Hearst Magazines.
At what high-profile Simmons/Hearst event was Ka-mbili featured? Which of Russell Simmons' foundations was being referenced? What is Russell and Run Simmons - a company, an organization, a thing? What's ANC?  What's SUNY? What's S.A. - perhaps South America, South Asia, San Antonio?  Did Ka-mbili himself perform "Izinhlungu Zami"?
All of such matters - amongst others - had been addressed in the text eviscerated by NmWTfs85IXusaybq.
It's perplexing !  What rational is there for Wikipedia to be blocking article enhancements and/or repeating postings of erroneous information? Paynethymaya (talk) 04:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SDUDUZO KA-MBILI editing standards ? 

message: I am trying to figure out if I need to - and how to - link information that is claiming that someone should be fired from their ethnicity-based position because they are not a citizen of a Native American reservation (i.e., it's all about the definition of "Native American"), which I have drafted Draft:Native American definition. Should I move that info? How do I do that so that no one sees where I put it from my contributions? Thanks! –CaroleHenson (talk) 03:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I am basing this on the type of language in the newspaper article, the non-profit, and in other newspaper articles about this issue. I don't mean to infer that I mean Wikipedia editors are trying to do that. Sorry, I have not been well and I am exhausted.–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to defamatory information 

message: On the English Transparency International e.V. wiki talk page I have flagged unverified claims and questionable allegations of serious misconduct against a living person.
I am now writing here, as unfortunately no review of this section has happened during the last months, and I am hoping that someone from this Wiki Project has the interest and the resources to take a look at it.
Kind regards Transparency 24 (talk) 10:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruno Brandão