Talk:What Is Your Dangerous Idea?

message: I suppose one or two ideas from each general topic (psychology, biology etc.) would be fine.  Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 22:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas 

message: :Image:Rename.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rename.jpg

message: I think we need a reference for the book in the "followed by" part of the book infobox. Just minor detail. Since I did not add it, I can only presume you did, Midorihana, so I turn to you for a reference. I'm sure there is one, but if there isn't, then we must remove it. -- 18:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We need a reference for it? (I did add it, by the way) I have the book in question, I need to finish reading it. It just came out about a month or so ago. Here's the original question:  --Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 20:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just wanted a reference (footnote) to avoid crystal balls. -- 03:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, okay.  The article just hasn't been created.  (yet) --Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 03:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Followed by... 

message: I think where the article could mainly improve is the explanation of the methodology involved in putting the book together. After reading the article, I'm still somewhat unclear on who was asked for their input, how the discussions were structured (if they were structured), and how the author put it all together in writing the book (collection of quotes? or summary/analysis? maybe a mix? how are the subjects organized?).
Also, on a slightly tangential note, where did the "to gather a hundred of the most brilliant minds in the world in a room, lock them in, and have them ask each other the questions they were asking themselves" quote come from? A Google search only points to this article. If it's not a quote, I'd take off the marks to avoid possible misdirection.
Overall, nice job!
— xDanielx T/C\R 20:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General thoughts/reactions