Talk:Ingleby Barwick

message: First things first, I'm wanting to add a link to a new Ingleby Barwick community forum. I’m in no way affiliated with any other Ingleby Barwick website. 
I'm aware that if i posted a link, you would most likely remove is straight away. So, please hear me out! I recently moved in to Ingleby Barwick, and would like to contribute to the community. Being in IT, my initial thoughts were "I'll start a forum". I have ran many successful and active forum communities in the past, and know how much hard work is needed to get things of the ground. I feel that existing websites (no names) have lost their focus, and are now centred more on making profit from advertisers than actually benefiting anyone!
I have just completed the design of the site, and am now in the process of getting flyers and posters printed for distribution around the estate (note my carefull choice of word, its still an estate isn't it!). Just one of the many methods that i will be using to help make the site in to a valuable community resource. It will be a hard slog, but I’m hoping with the right moves, it will be successful. 
To check out the site design you can visit it here.
Andrew, "forums should generally not be linked to" - I think the key work here is generally. There is no rule that states you can't link to forum communities. To shoot down something that could be beneficial for all isn't helpful, and to me defeats the point of a site such as wikipedia!
The first hurdle in getting things off the ground is getting targeted traffic. A link from this site would do such a thing.
You can get in touch with me at "mailme(at)matthewpark.co.uk"
--Mattpark 22:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Link Request

message: I really think linking to these "community forums" is completly unnecessary as we are already linking to their parent site "InglebyBarwick.com" which has explicit links to the forums.  The only reason they "claim" the forums are seperate is because they got in to trouble over some of the things that were posted on the forum when it was hosted with the site.  Also they are not very active forums at that, so I see no need for a direct link from this article.-Andrewduffell 07:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Andrew is completely correct in his assertion here, please refrain from continuously adding the link to the forum. I don't know if it is the owner of the site is adding it or not, but if so this is spam/self publicity and also not permitted on wikipedia.Super Ted 10:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: I've already reverted the addition of a pronunciation description once and its been readded. I noticed Andrewduffell also reverted the change at the Thornaby on Tees article. I've not seen this type of pronunciation description in any other articles. I feel this change should be reverted. Any objections please discuss, I don't want to get into a revert/edit war over this. Super Ted 15:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Providing pronunciation for geographical locations? It's very common: see Berwick-upon-Tweed. Holgate 15:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's a good idea to have pronunciation guides where there is a need. There's clearly a need in places like Berwick-on-Tweed and Keswick, and so too is there a need when describing Ingleby Barwick. I vote it stays. Arcturus 16:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, the method to describe the pronunciation was incorrect.  The standard as far as I can see is as in this article. --Andrewduffell 18:46, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The way Andrew suggests looks more in fitting with an encyclopaedic entry as far as I'm concerned. If someone understands the terminology it may be useful to update the entry. Super Ted 00:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation needed?

message: The article needs splitting into sections under seperate subtitles. Andrewduffell 11:12, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up

message: This is the text taken from the BBC Domesday Project:
    Ingleby Barwick is a new private      
    residential estate built on the       
    southern perimeter of the old Thornaby
    airfield.It was officially opened in  
    1981 by the mayor of Langbaurgh,a     
    borough of Cleveland County.The estate
    caters for the demand in the home     
    market from the small terrace to the  
    large detatched.Three main contractors
    are involved,each offering their own  
    individuality.The main criticisms from
    the new residents concern amenities,  
    access and communications.There are no
    shops,pubs,school or leisure centre   
    although the estate is now 5 years old
    and reasonably established.Poor bus   
    service,inadeqate[sic] road surfaces and a 
    feeling of isolation all combine to   
    give the majority of residents a sense
    of neglect.This would appear to be a  
    common problem_the failure to supply  
    the basic requirements of a community.
-Andrew Duffell 15:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: BBC Domesday Project 1986

message: What criteria apply to external links. Those I'd added for schools are shown  but those for churches which I'd just added have been removed? Link for BO2SS was removed but one for moneymaking health club remains .
:WP:EL gives details of our external links guidelines. Keith D (talk) 12:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Substituted at 18:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ingleby Barwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716203048/http://www.teesarchaeology.com/document_library/documents/roman_booklet.pdf to http://www.teesarchaeology.com/document_library/documents/roman_booklet.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161023083617/http://www.jameswharton.co.uk/ to http://www.jameswharton.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Ingleby Barwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331021254/http://www.robinsonsestateagents.co.uk/branch-selector/estate-agents-ingleby-barwick to http://www.robinsonsestateagents.co.uk/branch-selector/estate-agents-ingleby-barwick
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930204600/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/bound_map_page.jsp?first=true&u_id=10558840&c_id=10001043 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/bound_map_page.jsp?first=true&u_id=10558840&c_id=10001043
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605231121/http://www.eng-h.gov.uk/archcom/projects/summarys/html98_9/2031.pdf to http://www.eng-h.gov.uk/archcom/projects/summarys/html98_9/2031.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110828022238/http://stfrancisib.org/default.aspx to http://stfrancisib.org/default.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081004113659/http://www.planningwam.stockton.gov.uk/WAM133/showCaseFile.do?appType=planning&appNumber=07%2F3296%2FFUL to http://www.planningwam.stockton.gov.uk/WAM133/showCaseFile.do?appType=planning&appNumber=07%2F3296%2FFUL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081004122249/http://ts17.gazettelive.co.uk/2008/06/cctv_needed_at_tesco_store_at.html to http://ts17.gazettelive.co.uk/2008/06/cctv_needed_at_tesco_store_at.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Ingleby Barwick layout in 2014, since then housing has been built on the eastern half of the land from Basselton Beck to low lane but it might be counted as Maltby 
please can somebody crop it
(I found it when looking for photos it is English but was on polish Wiki - since international wiki-articles are newer they find newer images quicker when set-up) Chocolateediter (talk) 10:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see what I can do with this when I'm on my other computer that has SVG editing software.  Can you think of any other changes needed to it?  Should I add Ingleby Manor (is that the village name?) onto it? MapEdit (talk) 13:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Ingleby Barwick villages 

message: I can't get my head around IB being a "royal charter town", as per recent edits. It's a very large housing estate. I can't find any references for the assertion about royal charter towns, nor even anything to describe what they are (excpetions maybe for the likes of Royal Wootton Bassett). Can anyone shed light on this? Arcturus (talk) 00:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for amending the article. It sounded a bit pompous to assign the 'royal' epithet to a modern place like IB. Arcturus (talk) 14:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

text: Thanks. Not sure about the villages. At least one of them - Sober Hall - has no amenities at all and is literally a housing estate. It may be overkill to go for separate articles, but we can always see what it looks like with them in place. When you say "should IB be on the intro", do you mean something like "Ingleby Barwick - Lowfields" as an article title? Incidentally, I've put a reference in for the IB Leisure Centre and updated it. I also trimmed it a bit, but by all means put material back if you think it's helpful to the reader. Arcturus (talk) 15:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

text: The layout looks good. So this is the model structure for the other villages, where appropriate? In fact, even areas such as Sober Hall, which, arguably, doesn't qualify as a "village", could still be documented using this layout. Good work! Arcturus (talk) 18:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal charter town 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Ingleby Barwick's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "gias":
From Delta Academies Trust: 
From Ingleby Manor Free School: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Ingleby Barwick]]