Talk:Canadian Labour Party

message: I have moved to the proper name based on historical record, it was called the Canadian Labor Party, a proper record of this can be found at Alex Ross will run in Calgary, Calgary Herald June 8, 1926 --Cloveious 19:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, exactly.  Looking at the newspaper I see instances of "labor" used as a word (that is, not part of an official name) as well as "color" and "favorite".  To argue that "Labor" was the official spelling would, to me, suggest there was a period in which Canadians routinely used American spellings, which seems highly questionable. --Saforrest 04:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

text: As some rather weak counter-evidence, the party is listed as "Labour" on a page about B.C. electoral history by the B.C. government: . --Saforrest 04:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

text: The party is referred to as 'The Canadian Labour Party' by the Canadian Encyclopaedia, by Norman Penner in 'From Protest to Power: Social democracy in Canada from 1900 to present', Lorimer: Toronto, 1992. and by various articles in: 'The Canadian Journal of Political Science', 'International Political Science Review' and 'Political Behaviour'. Excluding the book reference, all of which I managed to find in ten minutes.  Academic consensus, then, apparently stands at 'Labour' party. Style guides for newspapers aren't generally very good. However, our best bet would be to look at a University style guide for Canada at the time, or failing that, a British university style guide. I'm going to 'be bold' or whatever and change it because there is apparently more evidence for 'Labour'. If anyone finds anything more concrete, I don't have books on Canadian history to hand or a university style guide, then we'll go with that. I don't think the word even needs a reference: if Canadian people and Canadian academics generally spell it 'Labour' today. Molotov2 (talk) 02:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I've no idea how to change the name of the page, if someone could that would be good. Molotov2 (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Labor vs Labour

message: I want to settle this debate once and for all. Here are the hand written minutes of a Manitoba Dominion Labor Party meeting clearly using Labor . The Alberta Legislature Library lists The Dominion Labor Party as a publisher  There is also this advertisement for a Dominion Labor candidate :Image:Dominion labor advertisement.JPG. The Alberta Labor News and the Canadian Labor Herald were actual publications put out by the party for many years in the 20's and 30's. Here is another good example that proves this debate, this article written by John Manley uses both Labor and Labour. Labor is used in reference to old publications and organization names such as The Canadian Labor party and uses the modern Labour when he is talking generally about Labour. We should be accurate in preserving original names as much as possible. The name Canadian Labour party does not jive with primary sources.  --Þadius (talk) 06:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof that its Labor is in the minutes

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canadian Labour Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706184337/http://www.lltjournal.ca/index.php/llt/article/viewPDFInterstitial/2472/2875 to http://www.lltjournal.ca/index.php/llt/article/viewPDFInterstitial/2472/2875
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified