lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Soviet submarine S-13

message: How can the keel be laid down 6 months after the ship was launched?  It is obvious that either the lay down date or the launch date is wrong, perhaps both. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PhennPhawcks (talk • contribs) .
: You are right. This is what happens with unreferenced articles, I can't even easily look it up :-( --BACbKA 22:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I googled for Soviet submarine S-13 launched and had no trouble finding a source for the dates (once I got past the Wikipedia mirrors).  I corrected the tyop and removed the banners. HTH HAND ➥the Epopt 01:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong dates in the article 

message: Under the command of Marinesko, then 32, on 30 January 1945, at Stolpe Bank off the Polish coast, S-13 sank the 25,484-ton German liner Wilhelm Gustloff....''
"Polish coast" changed to "Pomeranian Coast." Pomerania was then part of Germany, not Poland; it became Polish after 1945, under border changes decreed at the Potsdam Conference.  Sca (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Coast

message: Marinesko hoped to be awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union[citation needed]. He left the navy in early 1946, embittered. He was posthumously awarded the title in 1990.
Doesnt tally with the article on Alexander Marinesko, which asserts he was downgraded in rank in october 1945 then transferred to the reserve and retired in November 1945. Man Over-bored (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marinesko
File talk:English-language-wikipedia-.png

message: July 2007, eh? :P - UnlimitedAccess 07:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed that along with some other mistakes. That graph still needs a proper update. --32X 03:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Date 

message: What happened in october 2002? That's a big increase! There are also a number of other smaller spikes that look interesting. Would be cool to see a rate of increase graph of this too :) --naught101 (talk) 12:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that was when a bot added all the articles about every US town there is. Soxred93 has a boring sig 05:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spikes?
Talk:The Great Milenko

message: I made a change removing the phrase "squeaky clean" for POV reasonsAyreon 01:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is with the track listing and the poor formatting.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.115.27.191 (talk) 02:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia, how does it work? 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... I got the target not the redirect. Si Trew (talk) 09:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 
Talk:Lockheed Martin Space

message: OK, as this  Lockheed Martin is US government owned company are images taken from their satellites (i.e. IKONOS) Public domain??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.3.95.231 (talk) 10:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Lockheed Space Systems is largely just a contractor, the operator of the satellite determines under what licenses their images will be published. In IKONOS' case the operator is GeoEye, and images taken by IKONOS are their intellectual property. Also, I'm not sure you are correct about LMSS being owned by the US Govt, I thought is was just a division of the larger, private company. It does seem to take commercial contracts as well as govt ones anyway.--Cincotta1 (talk) 04:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Public domain
Talk:Oval (projective plane)

message: While I am no expert on ovals, I believe most results and definitions also apply to projective planes in general (even when you don't assume that the order must be a prime power which is still not proven).
Of course Segre and the parametrization are not possible in the most general case.
Any ideas?
Evilbu 23:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do the finite non-desarguesian planes have ovals?  If so, I think they'd be good to describe right after the "even q" case and before the "abstract oval" case. JackSchmidt (talk) 19:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Page 242 of Hughes and Piper's Projective Planes textbook says that the Hughes plane has ovals that are not the absolute points of a polarity (and so in particular has them).  A little bit more is probably needed for a whole section.  Someone more familiar with the area might find enough in that chapter, but most of it is phrased in terms of polarities, rather than just finding ovals.  Apparently though it is "easy" to find ovals (and hard to classify). JackSchmidt (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Actually they are not very "easy" to find, I've spent my entire professional life trying to do this and even though I have found more of them than anyone else, I have only found a handful. Wcherowi (talk) 05:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

message: There are many examples of ovals in infinite projective planes and results (see Planar Circle Geometries, an Introduction to Moebius-, Laguerre- and Minkowski Planes. (PDF; 891 kB), S. 43. The article name of this article should be changed to "finite Ovals" or material an ovals in general added.--Ag2gaeh (talk) 08:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finite Oval -  Oval 

message: Could somebody please add a citation to the definition of an oval in the projective plane, particularly for the real projective plane?
I realize that the given definition may be utterly standard for the field, but i still think it would be useful to have a definite source to consult.
For reference, the definition as it currently stands is that an oval is any set of points such that no line intersects it more than twice, and at each point of the set there is a unique tangent line through that point, and the tangent does not intersect the set elsewhere.
This definition allows the empty set, which is probably ok.
One question is whether an oval in the real projective plane is necessarily a (closed) curve (i.e., a continuous one-to-one image of the unit circle).
That sure seems plausible, but i think it would require a little analysis or topology, and i would like to look at a book where oval is defined to see if the point is addressed.
Son of eugene (talk) 19:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is an oval in the real projective plane necessarily a closed curve?
Talk:SS.12/AS.12

message: Please cite sources before adding any data that disagrees with the existing article (which already cites it sources). Thanks. Megapixie 23:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please cite sources [[WP:CITE]]

message: in the article the production is reported stopped in 1982 so the newest missiles are 37 years old so i've some doubt they are operational today 79.56.208.95 (talk) 10:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  in service??
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/John Bambenek (2nd nomination)

message: It amuses me that this nomination was filed the very same week I was in a front page article in the New York Times.  On second thought, maybe that does mean I have no credibility... -- Jbamb 23:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an amusing comment, it's my bio, I'm not going to participate in the deliberation, I was just noting some humor I got out of this. -- Jbamb 01:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

text: What is your basis for the accusation of bias against the Feminist Majority?  It appears to me that the anonymous nominator's IP address traces back to a fairly generic broadband IP. eaolson 19:01, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Intended as an aid to the closing admin.  This isn't a vote, so the simple numbers are not the point; nevertheless:
===Keep===
*Definitely genuine: 0
*Fake or dubious: 5
===Delete===
*Definitely genuine: 5
*Fake or dubious: 9
--Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 11:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've refactored this from the AFD page as it really shouldn't be there. On top of that, it was disrupting the outline of the day's AFD page. Stifle 17:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I've replaced it on the main page.  It is intended as an aid to the closong admin (who might even be me — and I know that I'd find it useful), and few if any admins look at the Talk page of an AfD. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 19:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken out the subsectioning to appease everyone.  And admins bloody well should look at the talk page of an AfD it the tab's not red.  New contributors occasionally put supporting rational there because they see only "votes" on the main page. - brenneman{T}{L}  03:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Statistics of fake vs genuine contributions

message: *Definitely genuine: 5
*Fake or dubious: 9
--Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 11:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've refactored this from the AFD page as it really shouldn't be there. On top of that, it was disrupting the outline of the day's AFD page. Stifle 17:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I've replaced it on the main page.  It is intended as an aid to the closong admin (who might even be me — and I know that I'd find it useful), and few if any admins look at the Talk page of an AfD. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 19:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken out the subsectioning to appease everyone.  And admins bloody well should look at the talk page of an AfD it the tab's not red.  New contributors occasionally put supporting rational there because they see only "votes" on the main page. - brenneman{T}{L}  03:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete
Talk:Telford (UK Parliament constituency)

message: "These areas are not large enough to outvote the powerful Labour machine in the working class parts of the constituency"
Just over a five-thousand majority hardly justifies this.
Why not? It happens to be true.
Telford is quite a polarised constituency you know; Priorslee is so Tory that it's one of very few wards in Telford & Wrekin that Labour don't run borough election candidates in, while some of the other wards are about as Labour as Priorslee is Tory (but turnouts are nowhere near as good).
Not mentioning the Labour machine would (and does) give a bit of misleading picture as to what the constituency is like; would it be better if it was "These areas are not very large and have so far been unable to outvote the powerful Labour machine in the working class parts of the constituency"?
Al
Priorslee cannot be described as a town, a historical village/hamlet sure - but since the inception of the new town Priorslee is simply a small village surrounded by a very large new housing development within close proximity to the central business district of the new town - the wording on this section needs changing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.127.187.98 (talk) 02:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How does Telford get to be listed as "Labour Hold" when Labour didn't hold seat before as it didn't exist?
Perhaps a new Template listing new seats as "Labour Win" (or Tory, LibDem, etc.) is needed. Fanx (talk) 10:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Seat in 1997

message: Listening to results from BBC Radio Shropshire this morning, I have updated the information to reflect the seat has changed hands, from Labour to Conservative, by a smaller margin than at 2010; however, please check the vote figures inserted in the 2015 election table as I am not sure I heard one of the results for one candidate correctly.Cloptonson (talk) 05:35, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Xtommox is thanked for correcting the figures for Allan's and Wright's votes. I have just corrected the 2015 majority figure in the constituency History section.Cloptonson (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: UPDATE - 2015 General Election
Talk:OpenEXR

message: Sorry, mispelling Billy Biggs name was a mistake. I typo'd it in late one night. Chaoticbob 23:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article seems a little disorganized, and some parts of it almost seem like an advertisement for OpenEXR... I'm tagging for cleanup. qwe 07:51, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did a lot of work tonight, please let me know what you all think. qwe 04:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: The source about Cg programming language support of EXR: http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=05/12/06/2115258
I'm not sure of its accuracy, so I'd rather put this here for discussion. hub 02:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The list paragraph is overlong, incomplete and doesn't really belong in the article header. It also seems to have suffered from 'me too!' syndrome as people have added their favorite apps/os to the end.
That 'hurrumph' aside, I think the paragraph is a prime candidate for moving into a nice list further down the article, see WP:SAL for advice on how to list items in WP. I don't know enough about the subject to really do it effectively. EasyTarget (talk) 13:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  move applications into a proper list 

message: It leads to a page that displays jpeg images of what openexr images theoretically look like, but no actual downloadable samples. This seems misleading and not particularly useful. We wouldn't link to a page of jpegs as a sample page for .png...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.54.24.71 (talk) 04:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Samples" page linked to doesn't actually have any openexr files 

message: "It is notable for supporting 16-bit-per-channel floating point values blah blah.." 
Why only mention 16 bit and not the 32 bit float and 32 bit int?
Also EXR2.0 has been released with new features.  Seems like this needs some re-writes to add the new stuff and clean up the old crappy stuff.  (I mean more than a small sentence mentioning 2.0.)
:I agree, this article could use a reboot. Go for it! ;) Fnordware (talk) 19:05, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to update?
Talk:Martín García Island

message: Accurate though the existing map may be, it does not really illustrate the main points - that the Island is strategically located, wholly within Uruguayan territorial waters, yet less than 2 miles from the nearest Argentinian territory. It's clear enough on Google maps, but then we cannot use that here, I understand.  Davidships (talk) 22:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:TV format

message: I moved the following material from the article to here:
A definition of a TV Progam format could be the next: 
"...The frame or the structure of (cross)mediale expression in which the each time returning (characteristic) elements have been fixed, which builds to a distinctive and result-oriented contact with the target group. On basis of which the balanced mix of content, entertainment and interaction (repeatedly) can be produced...." [source: Daphne Dijkerman, January 2006]
# It's not clear who Daphne Dijkerman is, and why her view on TV Program formats is important;
# It appears to have been machine-translated from the Dutch Wikipedia article, and doesn't make much sense in English;
# It appears to have been copied from here. 
I think the above points need addressing before the text can get placed back in. --BillC 23:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed definition

message: In 2009 the article was moved from "TV program format" to "Program format", with rationale "Changed to more accurate terminology."
It seems the most common term is "TV format," so I'm retitling/moving the article to that.--Sum (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article renaming

message: I expect this article to discuss things like whether a comedy is shot in front of a live audience (or pretend to) versus, say, a single camera format—i.e., production details that show through in the way a series is presented, where we can end up "binning" series into particular formats, sometimes cutting across genres.
Instead, this article is talking about "formats" as something more specific—some particular IP for different regional markets, like "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?", "The Office", etc.  I find this weird.  That sounds like it's more appropriate for the article on television franchises (which is currently not a separate article of its own, but instead rolled in to the article on media franchises).
In the case of copycats, which don't necessarily belong to the same franchise—since the original creator/distributor/etc won't have anything to do with them—I do think it would *probably* be appropriate to give them some mention here, but it doesn't merit much more attention than a glorified footnote.  The main thing is that the article gives coverage to, say, the details between a sitcom like Seinfeld versus a sitcom like The Office. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with television/media franchise and write replacement
Talk:1992–93 in English football

message: This article now contains a quantity of text that was merged from another article, 1992-93, that was deleted via Afd on 27 February 2006.
According to Mailer diablo, who closed the Afd discussion, AlexWilkes was the only editor to have contributed actual content to the now deleted article, but as this does not now show up in the edit history, it should really be documented where this text came from, to make sure GFDL compliance is maintained, so I am doing this now, just for the record.. - Nzd (talk) 23:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged text
Talk:One Touch (Sugababes album)

message: Are you sure about July 30 2001? According to itunes it was released on June 26, 2001 and according to amazon it was released October 9, 2001  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 666ph666 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: iTunes always release things on the right day, but they mess up the release date later on. 11:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Release date 
Talk:Frostbiter: Wrath of the Wendigo

message: I am a novice and I created this page. I am terribly sorry, but I titled this page incorrectly...it should read "Frostbiter: Wrath of the Wendigo" but I incorrectly missed both the colon and the capital on the W's.Crieff 23:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has been moved to the correct title.  --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 00:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Novice

message: The 'details' section is very confusing; and seems to be full of original research which is not wanted by Wikipedia. Lots42 (talk) 10:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speculation?
Talk:Reefer Madness: The Movie Musical

message: I'd say this article is no longer a stub. Any votes to remove the "stub" tag?
SamuellusSoccus 23:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I want to watch Julian Silk (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  video
Talk:Crysknife

message: I don't remember any reference to "crystal knives" in any of the Dune books, so I edited out that bit; does someone have info justifying it?  Willbyr 23:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It just sounded like the obvious origin of the word to me. Worm teeth are made of crystal, and crysknives are made of worm teeth. Hence, crys(tal )knife. Then again, "crysknife" might also refer to the kris - but I think it's a coincidence. 220.237.67.125 09:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is this stuff about fixed/unfixed crysknifes and electromagnetic fields?  I've checked the books (old not the new) and not come across this.  Also the original books do not reference an electromagnetic field, they simply say that when the owner of a crysknife dies his crysknife turns to dust.  Finally - it appears the electronic field info was lifted word for word from here:
http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=520
*As the original author of this article, I resent the insinuation that I plagiarized the article's content.  The website you linked is indeed the site that I used as a source, but the same information can be found in many other websites.  Here are some links:
:http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sf/dune-faq/part1/
:http://www.darkholmekeep.net/dune/crys.cfm
:http://groups.msn.com/TheLandsraad/terminologyoftheimperium.msnw
Willbyr 17:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible copyright and just plain wrong 

message: Hi Willbyr.  I withdraw my comments.  The definitions are consistent with what I found in the Dune Encyclopedia.  I'll have to doublecheck the original books...
The crysknife is obviously related to the Jambiya.    Insinuations that it is related to the kris are absurd as the kris is an Indian knife, the Jambiya is Middle Eastern.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.114.11 (talk) 12:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Herbert drew on all of Asia to create his oriental exotic vision of Dune. Besides, the way I imagined the knife reading the books looks just like a Kris, nothing like a Jambiya. Also the Kris is a spiritual artifact, like the Chrysknife, carried in the exact same way. Read the books. Think about it. Also bear in mind all things in the canonical Dune universe are "atavisms" of things in modern day societies (circa Herbert's life)--67.54.192.38 (talk) 04:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusion 

message: While it's likely a crysknife can be broken, I don't recall that ever actually happening in the books; certainly not by a dying Fremen stabbing a rock. To my memory a fixed crysknife is "paired" to it's owner, and disintigrates soon after their death. Kingadrock (talk) 18:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Breaking?

message: The part about the crysknife not being sheathed until it draws blood sounds very similar to the legend of the swords made by Muramasa. Is there any information linking these two? 2001:5B0:28FF:EF0:0:0:0:3B (talk) 07:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese reference
Talk:Bruce Summerhays

message: Is this guy notable enough to included here? Albatross2147 23:51, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course he is. Golfcam 03:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

message: 13 February 2010, announcement was made. Bruce P. Summerhays will begin his service as a mission president of Florida Tampa Mission of the LDS, effective 1 July 2010. See http://www.ldschurchnews.com/articles/58784/Mission-president-assignments-for-2010.html - so not sure how to fit this new info in. 97.126.211.131 (talk) 03:48, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: additional new information
Talk:Platinum coin

message: "Platinum coins are an old form of money." Are you sure?? - 124.82.4.135 20:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...Old form of money"? 
Talk:12 Golden Country Greats

message: I hesiate to make a change but pretty sure The Mollusk is "limited" to psych-prog. 73.49.185.113 (talk) 13:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is the only album on which the group limited themselves to a specific genre of musico
Talk:Care Bears Movie II: A New Generation/to do

message: *Nominate at WP:FAC on January 10th; could be on the Main Page on the day the film turns 25 (7/3/2011 or 21/3/2011)Care Bears Movie II opened in North America on March 7, 1986, and entered wide release on March 21. 
*Could the plot section be further whittled down? At least I've done my best to control it (726 words at last count;  recommends 400–500 for children's animated features) (UPDATE [7/7/2010]: Now at 784 words; universe bloat quickly got to it) (UPDATE [18/9/2010]: Now at 779 words)
--Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Paintin' the Town Brown: Ween Live 1990–1998

message: Hi, everyone. I don't have a lot of experience editing Wikipedia but I added the sources/dates for the tracks on this album. My sources were the back cover of the CD, and the archive at Brownbase.org. There are a lot of mistakes on the actual CD so I tried to verify via Brownbase where possible. If I could find the actual show, I put the venue, city, and date. If I could not verify, I just indicated exactly how it is printed on the album with "unverified" in parentheses.
Westknife (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources/Dates for Tracks