Talk:Publicly funded elections

message: Should this page mention state senator of Maine Deb Simpson? She was a waitress before getting elected.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.226.192.133 (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deb Simpson 

message: I think this article needs a support and criticism section. The only criticism I have heard about clean elections has to do with it restricting freedom of speech, too much government involvement, and increase of taxes to pay for it. I do not know if all these points are valid but it's what I gathered from the PBS's NOW transcript http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/242.html. 69.88.112.114 00:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  support/criticism 

message: I don't believe that John McCain is a supporter of (fully) clean elections.  I am removing his name as there is no citation.
Nealc9999 18:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John McCain 

message: I believe that the more a more formal title for this page should be publicly financed elections.
I will not change as I am not sure exactly of the consequences of doing so, as well as the whether that is the general understanding of others.
Nealc9999 18:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of Page 

message: "Clean elections" is not a proper noun, yet this page is called "Clean Elections".  I moved it to "Clean elections", and a few months later someone moved it back.  Why?
If I see no response here in a while, I'll move it again.
Cos (talk) 00:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why capitalized? 

message: This article could do with being expanded to cover the topic in the context of countries other than the United States. Hasbn (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion beyond the US

message: I haven't found a single source that is not in favor of or neutral to "clean elections" calling them as such, except in reference to a group that is supporting it.  "Publicly financed campaigns" or "Fund Matching (campaign finance)" as titles would be much closer to what the article is actually describing.  When the title is favorable to the subject, there's a problem. I'm a new editor, so I'm going to read more on NPOV tags before placing one on this, but right now I think it might require one.  At the very least, the lead section needs to be rewritten.  Nmproofer (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious Neutrality Issue 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Publicly funded elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090102221321/http://www.adn.com/election/story/506632.html to http://www.adn.com/election/story/506632.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131009221257/http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2013/07/26/north-carolina-legislature-repeals-popular-judicial-public-financing-program to http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2013/07/26/north-carolina-legislature-repeals-popular-judicial-public-financing-program
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325135941/http://www.campaignfreedom.org/docLib/20080826_Issue_Analysis_3.pdf to http://www.campaignfreedom.org/docLib/20080826_Issue_Analysis_3.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106195655/http://www.campaignfreedom.org/research/resID.104/research_detail.asp to http://www.campaignfreedom.org/research/resID.104/research_detail.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929011543/http://www.campaignfreedom.org/research/resID.87/research_detail.asp to http://www.campaignfreedom.org/research/resID.87/research_detail.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified