Talk:Asian fetish

message: Some do, okay. But the complete article only cycles around that one theory.
That gens might play a role, the "exotic" aspect we might find more attractive than the more or less distant cousins all around us here in the western world
not a word at all about that. No it's all about "men seeking weak women". It HAS to be. So stupid...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.110.239.229 (talk) 20:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Worse, it left out the obvious. Short height and reduced body hair are feminine traits. They also happen to be Asian traits. Was this obvious truth unacceptable to admit? There is also a reputation for high IQ that could play a role, and the desire for future children to have a tiger mom. Instead, we get the raging feminist assumption that this is all about power over women. 97.104.89.121 (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The perspective you propose to include violates Wiki community guidelines of neutrality. Wiki reflects the majority opinion that exists among reputable published sources, and the majority of reputable published sources connect Asian fetishes (with a LOT of evidence from history, sociology, psychology, etc) to the power dynamics between white Western men and Asian women. There is not a significant enough amount of literature backing your point that "Short height and reduced body hair are feminine traits. They also happen to be Asian traits." is the reason why Asian fetish exists as it does. Ushtima (talk) 00:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Anecdotal evidence are useless, as they would be based on our personal experience rather than published research. Whether certain Asian women happen to match with the feminine beauty ideal of other cultures is an interesting thought, but we would have to see if there are sources which claim this. Dimadick (talk) 10:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

text: This wikipedia article is slightly biased and non-neutral in my opinion. By the way that it is biased against men's attraction which is many times not sexual and sometimes might get confused with sexual fetishization. 190.219.24.57 (talk) 22:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Men and women find particular characteristics attractive. White men in the US are seen as privileged and East Asian women as oppressed by the mainstream media so it will be obvious that anything which includes a white man is labeled as power dynamics and systemic oppression. The article is politically biased and doesn't analyze things from point of view that analyzes what makes a particular race of women more physically attractive to men (this is common sense). Rather, it analyzes it from a political point of view only focusing on US politics and history, ignoring the rest of the world where people can find women with particular physical characteristics (can be of a particular race) attractive, having absolutely nothing to do with the US or white supremacy. The only evidence you are talking about is from colonial US history. Also Wikipedia's guidelines of neutrality is based on that articles should not be biased, it doesn't matter if it is a mainstream opinion on a subject, it is still a bias. Rather, I suggest it should explain which the mainstream opinion is and also other opinions without actually taking sides with any opinion. The article explains what the mainstream opinion is but it takes sides with it and doesn't talk about any other opinions on the subject, besides, as I already said, only focusing on the United States, rather than the world in general, and only focusing on US history since colonialism and wars in East Asian countries. Maybe it should also be added that short height and reduced body hair, along with more attractive facial features, are more attractive to men, happening to be traits in East Asian people, this is somewhat likely (I'm not saying it's 100% fact, it is an opinion in itself). Also, perhaps it should be noted on the article that the opinion that asian fetish is based on oppression is an opinion, rather than fact, and not take it as the only opinion. 190.140.67.86 (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

text: It's quite disingenuous to ignore the fact that articles can be cherry picked to support a certain perspective. 68.206.188.115 (talk) 21:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One sided -> "White man prefer submissive women thats why "Asian"???