lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Natalia Sedova

message: She's now buried in Coyoacan, Mexico, next to the ashes of her husband. Her name is also in the plate. A very recent picture of the monument will show her name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.93.16 (talk) 05:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Burial place

message: Didn't Natalia Sedova unsuccessfully appeal to Nikita Khrushchev to have Leon Trotsky rehabilated at the time of the De-Stalinization in the Soviet Union.
User:Leon Trotsky 14:35 28 August 2005
:Yes.  This is mentioned in Wyndham & King's "Trotsky: A Documentary."  Trotsky's granddaughter Yulia Akselrod also wrote to a few Soviet leaders making similar requests.
::Not really. See http://marxists.org/archive/sedova-natalia/1961/11/09.htm. --85.212.10.10 19:13, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Attempt to Rehabilitate Trotsky

message: The article Aleksandra Sokolovskaya claims that Trotsky and Natalia met in Paris, is that correct? Or was it London? It also claims that the first marriage fell apart because of Natalia. Could someone please confirm with a reliable source and fill in these details? --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 00:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did they meet? 

message: It's a picture of a woman in what possibly could be a Mexican passport (no evidence of that, either). I'll take the picture down tomorrow if no one comes up with any proof that it's Sedova.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madler (talk • contribs) 12:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passport Image 

message: The picture used in the article (right) may not be of Natalia Sedova.  Here is a picture claimed to be her many years later.  Even accounting aging, it does not seem to be the same person.  If you have a reliable source, please check and either confirm or replace the picture.  Thanks... --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 06:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong picture?
Talk:La Chacarita Cemetery

message: "Marc Etcheverry (1989-2005), software designer" was added to the list, please check as was from same IP picked up for page vandalism a few minutes earlier. Alf 21:44, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! -Mariano 08:16, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Is this cemetery managed by the Argentinian government? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So the answer is no, then, if it is municipally run.  However, the Municipality of Buenos Aires is, besides being a municipal council, a regional government, equivalent to a state government in the United States.  Skinsmoke (talk) 15:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Cemetery 

message: Im sure its 50 hectares all the Chacarita Cemetery including the British and Gereman Cemetery.
Only the British and German together has around 5. The British Cemetery has about a 100mts aprox front and 200mts aprox to the back so... all the chacarita cemetery cannot be only 5 hectares...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.139.91.98 (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting Facts 

message: Does anyone know how many people are buried there? (approximately)186.136.132.134 (talk) 17:02, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many are there?
Talk:John the Fearless

message: Just what part of it is from the EB? it needs to be shown by quotation marks. A lot of historical work has been   done since, and the general references are not sufficient.  it can not be the basis of the article.The opinion of the EB, and that of later people,  about peoples' motives and the causes of events,   must be reference each particular part of it to a particular source, including the relevant page numbers.  The dispute over the right name, above, is most of it of much less significance than writing a proper article.DGG (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: quality of the article

message: The image :File:John duke of burgundy.jpg is distorted, elongated.  It was taken from a site displaying it that way. This site shows the portrait in its actual proportions. 84.75.191.239 (talk) 08:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the long face? 
Talk:Father Earth

message: How could you merge this into the Judge Dredd article? There are plenty of articles about various Judge Dredd characters, you couldn't just merge them into one, unless you'd prefer a specific article covering minor Judge Dredd Chracters, instead of merging it?. I don't understand why you'd want to merge this, please explain. --Vanguard 21:49, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers! Vanguard 16:24, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Pet monkey

message: This article was moved from Sailor monkey after this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:08, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD debate link 

message: I don't feel too great about the section called "Greatest Pets". Not only is it completely unsourced it is also clearly biased and does not acknowledge the argument of cruelty for having undomesticated animals, whose needs are difficult to meet in a home.
86.21.244.26 (talk) 12:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced and biased section 

message: This article could use a better name.  Sailor monkeys wasn't too awful, but I'd reckon we can do better than "Monkeys in ships..." --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 17:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmm 

message: this article is wholly about fictional situations and fictional characters, for some reason that just completely eludes me. I must have fallen asleep and missed by subway stop. Or else, maybe some material on - and this is just a tentative idea - keeping monkeys as pets might be germane? 76.109.129.235 (talk) 04:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: pet monkeys?

message: This article should have a section on the drawbacks of keeping a monkey as a pet, but I'm not sure how to go about writing it without sounding overly biased.  https://www.lpzoo.org/primates-dont-make-good-pets
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/2003/09/news-monkeys-primates-pets-trade-ethics/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10888700802536483
Daniypink (talk) 03:00, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  drawbacks of personal primate ownership
Talk:General Language

message: As having contributed a little to the article "Nhengatu", I agree that it should be merged with this one ("Língua Geral"), since these articles are about, as far as I can tell, exactly the same language. One thing I would do, however, is make the distinction between what one of my sources lists as (1) "Língua Geral of São Paulo" (which I think is the same as "Língua Geral Paulista" mentioned in the article) and (2) "Língua Geral of Amazônia". According to my sources, it is the second of these (L.G. of Amazônia) which is the ancestor of Nheengatú; the first one (L.G. of São Paulo) has no descendants. 
I'm a bit puzzled about the number of speakers listed for the language in the NY Times article (30,000); this number doesn't agree with SIL's Ethnologue, which puts it at 8,000 (another source has only 3,000). I'm more inclined to agree with Ethnologue, which isn't perfect but is widely consulted by linguists. Journalists, even those writing for the NY Times, sometimes get things wrong or just accept as fact what they hear from people they interview. S. Neuman 17:49, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging; NY Times article 

message: *I changed the order of the paragraphs to show the living language first and the extinct one second. 
*I put Nheenhgatu up front in bold so that this can stand as the central (sole) article for both LG and Nheehgatu.
*Also, a question: is LG an "Indigenous language of the Americas" (I haven't researched that category)? --Dpr 03:13, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  My changes
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Peter Lee and Mario Roering

message: I thought I might add that since the protection of the pages (I think, the dates need to be checked) it has spilled over into a single link war on the Karate page, with many version references to support it. However I don't know where I am and should put this. Bihal 22:07, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a pity and the parties to that revert would do well to desist. If this winds up at Arbitration, they can be sure that evidence of those revert wars will be included too. However, RfCs are for one issue at a time, so it should not really be added to the front page. If you have an outside view to contribute, it should be added to the Outside Views section of the front page. The 3RR covers periods of 24 hours at a time, and I'm not sure that the relevant IPs or users have reverted 4 times in 24 hours. If you think they have, then you should file a report at WP:AN/3. -Splash 22:45, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, but I don't think I will comment since my views are entirely related to the main Karate page, and not to the particular pages that are the subject of this RfC. I don't think my comments are substantial or substantiated enough to be valid here. Bihal 04:38, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question, since I've never contributed to these before
Talk:Facehugger

message: Should this be added to the list of things relating to the Alien universe? (Jamandell (d69) 22:12, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perhaps this article could be merged with Xenomorph as a subsection? There's already an article about the Queen on there and it would be logical to include this as part of it too.
Predator 08:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge support. Not significant encyclopedic distinction. Go for it, Alien fans. --Mashford 18:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Is this about Facehugger merging to Xenomorph or Superfacehugger merging to this one? Anyway, I support either or both cases, so my vote remains regardless. :-) Both Facehugger and Superfacehugger are just the plain ol' alien in a younger form, and I doubt either of these articles will grow very long. -- Northgrove 22:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Have merged the superfacehugger into this one and placed  template.Inane Imp 06:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support I support the merging of this article into the xenomorph article (and maybe some citations fo rthis research).--Mullon 04:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Support - it'd be much more at home within the ain Xenomorph section. (Emperor 20:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: When the facehugger attaches and 'implants' the egg thing, where does it grow. I always thought it grew in the stomach (possibly explaining the acid for blood thing?) however ive found some places say it grows in behind the solar-plexus, but how, wouldnt it be too much of a confined space? And how would the 'victim' survive with its trachea blocked once the facehugger had detached and the victim wakes up? Ian42 14:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Implantation
Talk:Short Tucano

message: OK, fun, but where is really the article about the Tucano (Tucanus spp. -- bird)? User:Mdob | Talk 22:14, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Tucano in English is the Toucan. Bastie 06:13, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bird

message: Why does the article state that this prop aircraft is a fast-jet trainer, when it is, clearly, not a jet?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.255.133 (talk) 12:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The aircraft is designed to have jet-like handling characteristics Dorset100 (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jet?

message: I propose that this article be renamed Shorts Tucano as no-one ever calls the Shorts Tucano the Short Tucano (ie it's made by Shorts, not that the aircraft is not as long as other types of Tucano). See the article on Short Brothers for confirmation of this usage. 217.34.229.213 14:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree - Short Tucano is the more common and official name for the aircraft. MilborneOne (talk) 14:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I too disagree. The company itself has traditionally been referred to as "Shorts" but the aircraft have either been "Short xxx" or "Short Brothers xxx", almost always the former. There are two exceptions: the Shorts 330/Shorts 360, where a rename should be considered; at present there is a redirect in place for the "Shorts" variants. I did read about the reason for these exceptions somewhere, but cannot recall where. It may have something to do with them being Shorts aircraft under Bombadier management. --TraceyR (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Short Brothers|Shorts]] Tucano

message: The text says the Tucano can climb much faster than the Jet Provost --  but the statistics box gives a slower rate of climb than the one in the Provost article. Any ideas? Manormadman (talk) 03:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rate of climb 

message: I suggest this page to be merged with Embraer EMB 312 Tucano, this type is a variation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dafranca (talk • contribs) 19:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose it has some major differences from the Brazil-built version more than enough for a seperate article. MilborneOne (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Refresh the Demon

message: I see that Riff Raff seems to be credited to (Waters) when this clearly is a remake of AC/DC's song from their Powerage album. Shouldn't it then be credited to (Scott, Young, Young)? 67.224.23.92 (talk) 04:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Riff Raff
Talk:Port of Liverpool

message: The table in this section contains a mixture of units and a total doesn't therefore make much sense. The 2003 total is the same as the value in the DfT Maritime Statistics 2003 for tonnage. It would make sense to convert all the values into 000s tonnes but I don't have the equivalent values for the other years. Bornintheguz 22:17, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Bornintheguz 12:03, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent activity 

message: I would have expected a section on dock labour in an article on the Port of Liverpool or a link to such an article if there is one. Danensis (talk) 20:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dock Labour 
Talk:Aggron

message: Ok... I'm confused. If it can't be found in the wild, they why did someone put that in the wild it has a 5% chance of holding a Hard Stone. 
--24.83.111.176 22:20, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Deskana is right, but it should probably be noted that it is not possible to do this without using a cheat cartridge or something. Vimescarrot 12:24, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error
Talk:Chalmette, Louisiana

message: I have added EPA photographs to show the widespread ruin by the flooding and the oil spill in Chalmette, Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina in 2005.  -Wikid77 03:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruin 

message: To avoid the appearance of a news-based article, I moved other paragraphs above the "Hurricane Katrina" section to balance the 250-year history of Chalmette against the few years of Katrina impact.  Also, other non-hurricane photos were added.  More could be written.  However, on balance, there are also detailed hurricane photos in the "Hurricane Katrina" section.  The neutral approach is to focus, as well, on other aspects of Chalmette, without ignoring the widespread devastation of the oil-spill impact, deep flood, and houses pushed off foundations.  -Wikid77 18:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyond Katrina 
Talk:Lao Che (Indiana Jones)

message: The categorization of Shanghai as a "myriad cesspool of vices and venoms" is a little over the top; I think the author is drawing too many comparisons between Shanghai of the thirties and Shanghai today.  As for the expression "nice try, Lao Che" being customarily uttered by expatriots upon departure, I would have to disagree.  Not once have I heard this uttered by anyone at any time, let alone enough to believe that it is a habit for anyone but perhaps the author.  This final paragraph should be deleted.
Paul
Agreed. -- Supermorff 12:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "nice try, Lao Che" 

message: I guess there was a dumb edit war over whether there should be just one or two photos of Lao Che in this stub article.  Is that really debatable?
Also, the paragraph about Lao Che being considered one of the first "realistic villains" in film, please give that a citation from a reputable critic or other source or I'm tempted to think the author of the line is not very familiar with the movies.  A "villain" is almost by nature something unrealistic; individual people in real life do not fit into character molds.  Also, if it's merely realistic that Lao Che gets away, there are lots of films where this happens, and Temple of Doom (1985) is very far from being the first.  I generally saw no value in that whole paragraph so I removed it.  If you have a disagreement on that assessment you can say so.  Rufusgriffin 09:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  two photos, 'realistic villain' paragraph
Talk:Secure Real-time Transport Protocol

message: My appreciation to Honeyman for creating this article. Alf 22:48, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

message: While I am no expert, I do know that the 7921 wireless phone from Cisco supports SRTP.  That said, there may be other wired IP phones which also support the feature.
Link to 7921
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7071/index.html
Blandmeat (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cisco 79xx phones and SRTP 

message: Those tables looked great, but they are doomed to be incomplete and are superfluous as of Comparison of VoIP software. In my eyes they were used as justify lots of linkspam. --Kgfleischmann (talk) 19:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of the tables and of links 

message: The RFC clearly stated the authentication tag is calculated over the entire header + payload. This wiki article suggests it's calculated over selected parts of the header + the payload. This may be true for some implementations, particularly those implementations which expect packet modification by mixers etc. However, shouldn't the Wiki  page record the RFC description?
--
M.O'R  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.206.1.49 (talk) 16:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authentication
Talk:Icy Tower

message: I merged from the Free Lunch Design article, which narrowly survived a deletion listing. --Tony SidawayTalk 23:13, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged from [[Free Lunch Design]]

message: Just download and install it. It should not be too hard, it includes an installer. -- ReyBrujo 23:13, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  como puedo hacer para jugar a Icy Tower 

message: it was released way earlier than 2005. I remember playing it 3-4 years ago!--Sonjaaa 22:30, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. The current date must have been believed to be a release date of the v1.3 (though it would still be incorrect). I will change it to the release date of the first version. :) Vinyanov 12:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005

message: I removed the notability tag, since this issue has already been discussed  in relation to this article with the decision being made to keep. --Zagrebo 15:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but where in the article is notability asserted? (Even the keep reasons in the AfD seem to be "it's notable because it's notable"). Marasmusine 20:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Oki doki, I didn't tag it for deletion though :> It was a notability concern tag. I know... they're both grey boxes though... Marasmusine 22:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: This article should really use protection. I find it vadalised, or being tested on, after each visit. And unfortunately some reverts do not even recover all content that was removed by the vandals. Well, at least we could infer, from the quantity of reverted edits, that the game is certainly notable for many people. That was per above sections. :) So, pity that so late, but I think I will file the protection proposal. Don’t you think? viny.tell // 22:44, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Welcome, I want to use the character Harold in my game 197.49.247.177 (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harold
Talk:Culture of poverty

message: Regrettably, this is an example of the very worst of postmodern tripe that seeks to cast 'the poor' (of whom the author gives no defining characteristic) as a collective victim class that may be excused its behaviour because of attribution to a self-serving 'culture'. This piece really should be Vfd but let's see...   Eddie.willers 23:16, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the article simply needs to be more clear about attributing these views to Lewis. He held these views and they were influential in shaping poverty research and policy for years afterward. The article isn't saying whether or not Lewis was correct, it's just summarizing what he said. FreplySpang (talk) 23:19, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
i'd have to agree with Spang. Cultures of Poverty are very common in this world, from capitalism. I'm a part of one.
Raccoon Fox 20:56, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *The culture of poverty argument is not social Darwinism in and of itself, though certain modern day "social Darwinists" certainly seem to like it (I'm not entirely sure that that term can be used in this article in a NPOV way at any rate)
*Oscar Lews did not intend to "blame the victim" for poverty; in fact he ended up with something that fell somewhere in the middle of entirely structural explanations and hyperindividualistic explanations.  It was others who came later who would use the culture of poverty argument to defend dismantling the "welfare state" and social nets.
*this article could be expanded considerably, with a better discussion of the War on Poverty, the ethnographic work that directly refuted Lewis' arguments (e.g, Carol Stack's All Our Kin), William Julius Wilson, Charles Valentine, Charles Murray, Massey and Denton, welfare reform, etc.
*I removed a metric ton of unnecessary links
--Birdmessenger 14:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes and recommendations 

message: Potential Bibliography for Article:
De Antuñano, E. (2019). Mexico City as an Urban Laboratory: Oscar Lewis, the “Culture of Poverty” and the Transnational History of the Slum. Journal of Urban History, 45(4), 813-830.
Gloria Ladson-Billings. (2017). “Makes Me Wanna Holler”: Refuting the “Culture of Poverty” Discourse in Urban Schooling. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 673(1), 80-90.
Kurtz, D. (2014). Culture, poverty, politics: Cultural sociologists, Oscar Lewis, Antonio Gramsci. Critique of Anthropology, 34(3), 327-345. JordanMay44 (talk) 04:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Albanian Catholicism

message: I don't know enough about the topic to edit this article any further, but much of this discussion relates to Albania itself, not Catholicism there. I'd like to see this article refer ONLY to issues of Catholicism in Albania, with the rest merged into the existing article on Albania.
Veg0matic 23:22, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content needs focus
Talk:Jilly Goolden

message: So Jilly lives in Royal Tunbridge Wells? I understood she lives in Nutley, East Sussex. Anyone care to add to this?
* From Knowhere Guide: Local Heroes in Tunbridge Wells, Kent
: Jordon actually now lives in Maresfield and i think Jilly Goolden lives in Nutley but shes regulary in and out of T Wells and Crowborough! Two other people say Tunbridge Wells on the same page but, as it says, all entries in the Knowhere Guide are the opinions of its users. --JanesDaddy 20:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where does Jilly live?

message: When testing the links, I realized that this article links to the wrong Michael Barry
JanesDaddy 09:51, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  links to wrong Michael Barry 

message: This source suggests that Goolden's husband Paul died in March 2021, aged 70. But I am unable to find a better source online. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Douglas Marshall 

message: FreeBMD gives only Surrey S.W. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth