lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Queen Victoria Primary School

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Stub on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: Needs references, more information, pictures, etc... Adam McCormick 05:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment|Assessment]] as of March 2007
Talk:Marrying Irving

message: Charlie Brown never got to kick the football, as I recall.  That was done by a different cartoonist as a tribute when many cartoonists honored Schultz after his passing.  According to CNN (granted, not a cartoon authority but reputable nonetheless) it never happened.
Edit: "... he did after Charles Schultz died. His son (I believe it was his son) created one more new strip in honor of his dad and Charlie Brown kicked the football."  Schultz himself never allowed it.
- Agentdenim 14:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad example
Talk:Pitcher (container)

message: This is interesting, but I can't visualise it.  Where on a ship is this most outward plank located on a ship?  And why is that hard to caulk?  Please make a picture to show us.  Ace Frahm 01:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "The most outward plank, the most difficult one to caulk"

message: I removed the following (incorrectly punctuated) sentence from the article: "Worth Noting, that the correct terminology when describing these articles is "An Ewer" as opposed to "A Ewer" - correct according to whom? Even if so, it needs a reference if it's even worth mentioning, and I'm not convinced that it is.  Aleta!
I agree. To begin with, it wouldn't be 'terminology', and anyway it's A ewer (e.g. Collins Dictionary https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/ewer) 79.40.164.63 (talk) 11:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar lesson?

message: Is there any difference between a pitcher and a jug? Would be reasonable to propose to merge the articles? --Brandizzi (talk) 03:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The original pitchers were so named because they were designed specifically to pour hot pitch.  They had very long spouts for this purpose.  This is not true of jugs.  So I do not believe the two articles should not be merged.  Geo Swan (talk) 01:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If the articles are not to be merged, they do need to be clarified. At the very least, no-one in the UK uses the word "pitcher" in general parlance (except in some specific terminology ), so there needs to be some reference to this divergence of nomenclature in this article or the Jug article. It's not easy, but something ought to be done. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 19:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jugs

message: Hey all, someone on the talk page for the main page brought up that it appears pitcher is used, albeit with less frequency, in other forms of English as well. Would this be a suitable reference https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/pitcher for that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LetUsNotLoseHeart (talk • contribs) 19:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought so too. Especially the claim that "American pitchers will be called jugs elsewhere" seems to be unsourced, so I added a citation needed tag. Maybe someone can find a good source that describes in which dialects the word "pitcher" is used and how often. Tc14Hd (talk) 04:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  AmEng vs BrEng
Talk:Trolley and lift van

message: I wanted to add that lift van is a term still widely in use as this has become the standard shipping crate to move personal effects internationally, however most companies that use these types of shipping crates chose to use the term as one word, liftvan
:: Agree, not sure about the one word spelling though Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 00:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shofet

message: First comment:
In the second paragraph of the brief article (which doesn't exist, according to this page), something seems to be omitted.  The text reads, "...its 'Punic' Mediterranean colonies such as...", leading one to expect examples.  But it continues, "...a shofet...".
Second comment:
Other sources relate "shofet" to Assyrian "sapatu".  Should this be mentioned?
[anonymous posting]
*The Assyrian -another Semitic language- would be worthwile, provided it gets sourced; hopefully it can be made into a third section Fastifex 06:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I am concerned that this article (as well as Biblical judges) is overly simplistic, fails to go into nearly enough detail, and (perhaps due to its being derived from the Catholic Encyclopaedia), seems to support Christian interpretations rather than being nonjudgemental.
Joseph Sanderson 18:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality/Balance of Article 

message: according to google shophet is vastly more popular English spelling than shofet. I think the better written shofet article should be used to replace the shophet article and shofet itself be turned into redirect. 76.119.30.87 (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article should be merged into the more commonly spelled [[Shophet]] article
Talk:AMSAT

message: Dear Fellow Wikipedians,
I JethroBT (WMF)  suggested that I consult with fellow Wikipedians to get feedback and help to improve my idea about "As an unparalleled way to raise awareness of the Wikimedia projects, I propose to create a tremendous media opportunity presented by launching Wikipedia via space travel."
Please see the idea at . Please post your suggestions on the talk page and please feel free to edit the idea and join the project.
Thank you for your time and attention in this matter. I appreciate it.
My best regards, Geraldshields11 (talk) 18:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grants:IEG/Wikipedia likes Galactic Exploration for Posterity 2015 
Talk:Tomáš Verner

message: I just want to say that you are an exelent skater,you have big talent! And by the way yoo are very cute!!!! KISS
                                      Nena 17,Serbia
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.93.228.210 (talk) 18:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HI, Tomas!!!! 
Talk:Kristoffer Berntsson

message: I'm pretty sure that Peter Johansson landed triple axel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.117.113 (talk) 02:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Agfa digital cameras

message: A marketing page about the PocketZip camera.
http://www.iomega.com/anz/bpc_digicams.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.92.108.247 (talk) 03:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  another reference 
Category talk:Structure

message: I do not understand what the meaning of category "structure" is. Should not it be explained in the text of the category page? --Pavel Jelinek 14:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A link is provided at this time to the main article on this concept.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sense of the category
Talk:CBU-97 Sensor Fuzed Weapon

message: Added requested citation and US Government - Military public domain image of article subject.
Jfischer5175 14:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thank you, Riddley.  Still learning the format codes.
Jfischer5175 16:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture format 

message: This thingie was featured on Discovery Channel's Future Weapons TV-show and the unit cost is said to be 1 million dollars. Probably ineffective against modern, reinforced top armour tanks like the swedish Leopard 2S, which got about 10 tons of extra protection compared to the basic german version. 91.83.2.192 19:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, this is effective against any tank. I think you'll find that the top armor of most any armored vehicle is quite thin. Most armored vehicles have a majority on the front, with less on the sides and rear and the least amount on the top. Jtrainor (talk) 03:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes this would rip straight through a Leopard 2S... - Heaney555z (talk) 13:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV for those who enjoy massacres.
Talk:Johannes Werner

message: Any reason not to merge w/ Johann Werner?  Any suggestions on which direction to merge?  Which spelling should be prefered?    Fredwerner 17:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged to here, as this article was was older, and the German article is also at Johannes Werner. -- Matthead discuß!     O       08:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: is Vernerus (nominativ) not Verneri. Deklination of nouns is something widely unknown to English speaking people.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.3.2.121 (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin Name 

message: Werner's date of death is said to be 1522 and 1528.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.85.252 (talk) 11:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date
Talk:Judy Martin (wrestler)

message: does anyone know her date of birth (WorldSeriesOfPoker500 (talk) 10:02, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthday
Talk:Jim Fixx

message: I have made changes to this article in an attempt maintain the wiki type of format. I am still working on it and welcome any help. References need to be added to the body of the text. KarateLadyKarateLady 15:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim Fixx comments about article 

message: Someone wanted a citation for the following quotation:
"However, he is also regularly cited as an example of the possible dangers of exercise."
When I did an internet search to try to provide citations, I was shocked to find a plethora of COUNTER-indications.  That is--the idea that running is healthy and that it's not really why Fixx died is the repetitive message.  I'd suggest removing the quotation.  206.124.31.24 01:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, what I found on the internet was a genetic heart condition that killed Jim along with factors of his unhealthy lifestyle before he got into running. It was mentioned that running might have even prolonged his life dispute that.Mikeman370 (talk) 18:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

text: What people think it argues is irrelevant. Nothing is getting added to the article about Jim's health unless it is supported by reliable sources that mention him specifically. Damien Linnane (talk) 00:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed Dangers of Running Citations 

message: I have removed the following "references". They are a) not referenced in the article b)do not add any value or information and c) in the case of the latter two seem like link spam. Anyone with another opinion, please state so and re-include the links. BjornVDM 18:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed References 

message: I removed the following links because they have no bearing on the text of the article: Junk food and Twinkies.
Obesity, Cholesterol, and Healthy diet have some bearing on the article, but I would argue that these are still mostly irrelevant, as well, and should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.169.220.161 (talk) 23:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Irrelevant Links 

message: http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/diet-and-fitness/exercise-do-you-know-when-to-stop-20120604-1zrlk.html 122.106.177.130 (talk) 06:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Archived versions show this article didn't even mention Jim. Articles about exercise in general have no relevance here. Damien Linnane (talk) 00:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dangers of excessive exercise?
Talk:Chronicles: Volume One

message: Maybe somebody should find out when the next book is coming.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.162.7.174 (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The cover of the book says, "Volume One". Why has it's title been abbreviated? This needs to be changed. Thanks Educated Guest (talk) 23:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed at last. (thanks to RHaworth) Mick gold (talk) 08:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

text: In music it's not unheard of to use a "Volume 1" designation without having a Volume 2 ready to go. The Honeydrippers' only EP was The Honeydrippers: Volume One, but Robert Plant never released anything else under the Honeydrippers name, much less a Volume Two. George Michael released Listen Without Prejudice Vol. 1 in 1990, and even though he lived more than 25 years after that and released three more albums, he never released a Listen Without Prejudice Vol. 2, in part due to a dispute with Sony Records. And to take an example where Bob Dylan was personally involved, the Traveling Wilburys' first album was titled Traveling Wilburys Vol. 1. Unlike the former two acts, the Wilburys did keep up the volume numbering with their next album ... although they titled it Traveling Wilburys Vol. 3. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Jgreenbaum44 (talk) 00:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 3225G 2023
Talk:Merced Sun-Star

message: Few newspapers have proofreaders anymore. Proofreading duties at many newspapers are handled by copy editors. The Sun-Star has five-person copy desk. Mercedsunstar
Why does this accurate information keep getting deleted from this page?  I think that Merced Sun-Star writers and editors should identify themselves when they contribute to, or delete material from, this article.  Mercedboy07 20:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ribosomal protein

message: Seriously, it doesn't say anything about function or purpose, or anything relevant. It just blathers on about E. Coli. Man! ~ Flameviper 14:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF is this supposed to be? 
Talk:Kunga

message: This appears to be a hoax. I haven't been able to find any reliable source to support the claims in this article. 
*http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Christopher+Marlowe%22+kunga
*http://www.google.com/search?q=kunga+Svolskoijd
*http://www.google.com/search?q=kunga+grinning&num=100
*http://www.google.com/search?q=kunga+cannibal&num=100
*http://www.google.com/search?q=kunga+myth&num=100
*http://www.google.com/search?q=kunga+mythological&num=100
Also, 195.92.168.163 vandalised this article a couple hours after creating it (previously a redirect to Latvian mythology, an alt name for a holiday celebrating pigs). Not proving the same person, but the 2nd person would have to had determined his IP and typed in the Contributions page for that IP. TransUtopian 14:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax
Talk:Torterra

message: I read somewhere that the possible English name for this Pokémon was Tectoise. Michaelritchie200 13:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Until Nintendo itself confirms it, then treat its name as it is currently printed on the page.  We have a more high-profile dispute (regarding Serebii's possible English name "Mantyke") over at Tamanta. -Jeske (v^_^v) 04:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

message: According to MCY and Blaziken Master, we have no evidence that the card in that image is in fact genuine.  Mind linking to the page that has a link to the image, rather than the image itself? -Jeske (v^_^v) 12:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here. I dunno myself, though, really. —M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 12:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: http://pokebeach.com/ has the pictures too.  Say that it came from a press release. Zaver 19:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, I don't have any objections to using the cards myself, but if anyone does (which some people seem to), I don't suppose I have any response to their concerns that the cards could be fake. Two sites, though... —M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 20:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: However, noting Talk:Goukazaru, we'd need someone at Wikipedia affiliated with the press in order to confirm it.  If you know someone, get them to help if they're willing. -Jeske (v^_^v) 21:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

text: !FLASH! AMIB says they're acceptable. -Jeske (v^_^v) 03:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. It's not really a press release (those go out on press wires), but it's a fansite seed kit PUSA sends to the big fansites. Everyone is saying exactly the same thing and citing it to Nintendo, and these sites are passably reliable when they're making claims that can be corroborated. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 03:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Fraud? 

message: It has one on each side of its head, not two on each side. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 19:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horns
Talk:Heathen

message: I do not believe that any of these contributors have the Heathen religion themselves, which is the indigenous religion of Norway. I think this whole post is a horrible religious hate attack by another religion entirely. Please contact a Heathen Vitki to write up a better post right now!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.9.82.140 (talk) 09:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: As a result of the move over redirect, editions of Heathen between 2003 and 2005 have been restored to preserve attribution for content which has been merged to Paganism. Deryck C. 21:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial [[WP:HISTMERGE]]
Talk:Oklahoma State Reformatory

message: I have a completed article waiting to be put up.  Please unblock the site so that I can post the rest of my article, which has correct sites for the information gathered.  Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 163.120.73.102 (talk) .
:The article isn't locked, and your IP address isn't blocked, so you should be able to edit. That said, if you're Alexandragribbin 2010 (who created the article), then you should probably sign in before editing. Cordless Larry 15:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Palemonids

message: May be the title of this article should be Palemonids? As for example Gediminids? Orionus 14:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Augustinus Rotundus, however it`s rather legend, this guy was writeing about it. Anyway, interesting thing.Mikołajski (talk) 00:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: First Latin(Italian) copy of Laurentius (1531) of the First Statute made 1531.Almost same time as Rus Statut. Александр Макович (talk) 19:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:   Latin copy of Laurentius (1531) of the First Statute
Talk:Æthelred I of Northumbria

message: This King's dates are given as 774-779, but the list of Kings of Northumbria states that he was restored 790 to 796, and the article on Alcuin says that he never returned to his native Northumbria because of dissatisfaction with Aethelred's conduct.
Dudley Miles 27 Sep 2006
:You can sign your comments on talk pages with ~~~~. I've tidied the article up a little, but please do make any improvements you think are worth doing. Thanks ! Angus McLellan  (Talk) 18:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hemineglect

message: Since this article is an orphan stub, and since there is already a more complete page, Hemispatial neglect, which is another clinical term for the same neurological syndrome, would it make sense to merge this page with Hemispatial neglect, or even simpler, to just turn this page into a redirect to the Hemispatial neglect page?  Edhubbard 15:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lieutenancies Act 1997

message: i can't find any substantive debate on this Act - it was rather rushed through.  it would have been the perfect opportunity to try and restore the mersey and tyne as ceremonial borders.  curious there weren't any probing amendments : i suppose the MPs who supported this type of things had more pressing concerns on their mind at the time?  Morwen - Talk 15:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, found the answer: this was just a consolidation bill and as such debate on its provisions were not allowed.  Morwen - Talk 23:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Debate
Wikipedia talk:Ostracism

message: Great proposal but the name won't fly. Make it sound more like fluffy bunnies and sunshine. Haukur 15:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I think this idea is seriously lacking any protective measures that would prevent admin cliques from forming and dominating discussions, admins may feel the need to ally themselves just to avoid this proccess. There needs to be checks and balances to prevent abuse and this seems much to simple at this phase. --NuclearUmpf 15:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your reaction is natural but represents too pessimistic a view of human nature or, at any rate, the nature of the average Wikipedian. Making an encyclopedia which absolutely anyone can edit was wild-eyed and dreamy but it's working reasonably well. Admins won't request people's bit just because they disagree with them or because they're not a part of the right clique. Systems similar to this have proven themselves on other Wikipedias and even on this one. We have a :Category:Administrators open to recall with a bunch of members and there hasn't been any abuse of that at all. Haukur 15:43, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You do not run into abuse there because who it is that is open to recall, those admins are ones that often do not get into conflicts with people, mainly because they use more civil discussions then others. If a proccess can be easily abused I think it needs to be refined to stop such abuses not brushed under the run because we want to believe that people come here just to edit. People do come here just to edit, I dont think anyone ever woke up thinking I need to find an encyclopedia to vandalize, but not addressing easily exploitable flaws is just digging your head in the sand (not specifically you) --NuclearUmpf 10:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The category includes such veterans to conflict as Aaron Brenneman, Piotrus and Herostratus. Haukur 12:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

text: part of the reason for choosing the "ostracism" name is that this sort of process has stood the test of time in a real-life egalitarian society. And because I'd rather compare WP to ancient Athens than to the Soviet Union :) dab (ᛏ) 15:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

text: well, if five admins gang up and ostracize me, so be it. I'll happily submit to RFA, and if the community feels that the ostracism is abusive, I'll pass with flying colours (and the bad faith nominators will lose prestige). I'll then have three months peace. So I don't see the problem. If admin cliques will form, they will form anyway, but I doubt they will form as a result of this process. The important thing is that such re-submission should not be seen as something to be avoided at any cost, but as a slight bother at best, and a chance to get community feedback. I do hope that any admin that feels the community wants to be rid of them would be willing to give up their button, that's simple AGF as they only ever got their buttons at the behest of the community. dab (ᛏ) 15:47, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Abuse
Talk:Kenova, West Virginia

message: CITY WEB SITE IS "http://www.kenovawv.com"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.154.142.33 (talk) 22:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)