lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mahalo Air

message: Does anyone know if this website is a credible source for this airline's destinations? Mahalo Air Schedule --Resplendent (talk) 00:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is, in fact, Mahalo Air's old web site.  At the time, Islander Magazine was their in-flight magazine.  Ten years after shutting down, it's still there, with the "all flights temporarily suspended" message. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 02:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destinations 

message: It looks like there's actually some conflicting info about this out there.  The site I used for the table in the article lists 6 aircraft, but this one lists 13.  Was this due to some being on order, then cancelled when the company went into bankruptcy, or did the carrier actually operate more than 6? --Resplendent (talk) 17:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Airfleets seems to be pretty reliable.  You'd have to take a close look at the dates to see how things line up, but as I remember it, at one point Mahalo switched to older ATR42s which were less expensive to lease but ended up having more engine problems, causing reliability issues and ultimately more replacement costs.  That was one of the reasons cited when they stopped flying.  Digging through the Star Bulletin archives would probably yield some good info.  As an aside, one article I checked indicated they were flying 7 aircraft at one point.  One other issue is that neither site accounts for the F.27s the airline used when they started up initially and the flights were operated by Empire. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I crosschecked with Airlinerlist.com's list and they show 13 ATR42s.  It looks like the Planespotters.net list misses most of the ATR42-300 fleet.  I also added the F27 data based on Airlinerlist.com's data. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleet 

message: The usage of  is up for discussion, see talk:Mahalo (word) -- 65.92.181.39 (talk) 23:03, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Mahalo}}"
Talk:USS Curtis Wilbur

message: I'm the Public Affairs Officer for CURTIS WILBUR.  Earlier today I tried to add further history of the ship and it wa removed (by MBK004, whose Talk Page I could not edit) for not meeting verifiability standards.  This seems indefensible because the ship's history comes from its schedule, which is classified.  The information I added was culled from a classified source, and the parts from it that I added were unclassified.  The information is therefore unverifiable (even though it's true, I was onboard for all the things I added) because the source is classified.  I also noticed that all of the pictures of the ship have been removed, even though they were uploaded by a sailor, making their use acceptable as it was all government work.  Please advise on how I should go about "proving" the information I wish to add. CDWPAO (talk) 07:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curtis Wilbur History and Pictures 
Talk:Council of Ministers (Bhutan)

message: The title "Bhutan's Council of Ministers" appears to be synonymous with "Lhengye Zhungtshog", and so there should not be two articles. I think that page has some history that could be incorporated into the first few paragraphs here. Grafen (talk) 11:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put the information from Bhutan's Council of Ministers into this article as a history section. All the information there was outdated, so it made for a nice history section. I'll nominate Bhutan's Council of Ministers for deletion. JFHJr (㊟) 20:31, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:USS Dewey (DDG-105)

message: USS Dewey DDG-105 is underway to San Diego from Pascagoula,Mississippi.The Ship left Northrop Grumman Ship Systems Ingall's Operation around 0900 hours Wednesday the 4th of November 2009.Sources say they will be making a couple of stops along the way,then through the Panama Canal to her Port in San Diego,California.
:: Wikipedia Talk pages are not an appropriate location for ship underway news. There are crew family phone trees, websites, and other news distribution for this; Wikipedia Talk pages are intended for discussions concerning the article itself. — al-Shimoni (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 addition 
Talk:Political boss

message: Donald Trump as a political boss, really? Bosses are regional, not national, and firmly control their political organization. Love or hate him, Trump is objectively a political outsider and insurgent trying to wrest power away from his parties’ actual power players.
50.25.164.57 (talk) 18:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article's lead paragraph is in need of some clarification and revising.
:What is meant by a "unit" of a political party--a geographic unit such as a county or state (e.g. the Berkeley County Republican or Democratic Party)?   Particular constituencies?   Are units non-geographic?
:The terms "ward" and "alderman", to my knowledge, are not commonly used outside of the northeastern United States.  "Alderman" is not used at all where I live in the Southern U.S.  "Ward" is very infrequently used in the South; precinct or district are much more common terms.  
:The style is somewhat awkward.  For example, "Reformers sometimes allege that bosses are likely guilty of corruption." 
:I also tagged for clarification:
::In which undeveloped countries do bosses commonly exist?
::Is there a citation that shows how voters during the Depression in the U.S. were signed up for government programs under Harry Hopkins' leadership?  There may be sources that support this; I'm not aware that this happened. 
Can some editors give some attention to this article, particularly the lead paragraph? 
Foreignshore (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comments. This article is quite sad, perhaps doomed by a difficult if not impossible topic to nail down, exhibiting numerous problems, starting with the disagreement between the very article title and lede sentence. It's intimidating to imagine how to improve it. Hugh (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:USS Farragut (DDG-99)

message: The ship's launch date on the Navy's website says 07/09/2005? -Falcon8765 (talk) 01:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accurate launch date? 

message: The US Navy has admitted its USS Farragut guided missile destroyer has damaged the Norwegian Coast Guard vessel KV Nordkapp's electronic systems and injured some of her crew, by powering on a high-output (5MW) Aegis air defence radar antenna in close vicinity of the other vessel.
According to the investigative committe, the norwegian crew was exposed to powerful electromagnetic radiation in the 3-4 GHZ frequency band, with same sailors suffering persistent headaches and skin burns in the aftermath of the incident that occured during an August 2012 joint naval excercise held in the Arctic Ocean region. 94.21.121.89 (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want something changed in the article, it is best to request it in a "please change 'X' to 'Y'" format, and be sure to include a source to support the change. Also, please take note of our neutrality policy. Thank you - wolf 21:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 15 March 2023
Talk:Human language technology

message: This article appears to see HLT through a very narrow lense.  It ignore decades of HLT work prior to Wydner, as well as decades since.  It makes amazing claims ("invented HLT"???) and fails to document them.  It appears to be little more than self-promotion.  An encyclopedia article must consist of more than dozens of quotes from one practitioner in a field. —johndburger 20:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would simply redirect this to Language technology (which should also be cleaned up). --Silvonen 05:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Worst article ever?
Talk:HMS Ledbury (L90)

message: Hey, I just assessed the article.  I could give it B class as it is the highest in my power. However, I certainly think you should nominate this article for GAC and later A class review. Good luck. Kyriakos 22:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I'd very much like to talk privately to whoever was kind enough to provide such a wonderful history of the Ledbury. My father, Eric Woodland, was her radio operator from commissioning of the ship until the end of the war. I suspect there weren't many men who were with her throughout.
My father told a story as he was dying about an incident he said happened in, I believe, Greece. My father rarely talked of the war and certainly never romanced about it or boasted of what he did. And yet it generally and something specifically troubled him deeply. It could have been the story that he told in his last hours or that could have been the rambling of a sick man. If anybody would be willing to help, I'd deeply appreciate the chance to talk. You can contact me, please, on my own "talk" page. My many thanks. 77.194.246.214 (talk) 15:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact with writer
Talk:Bluestone, Pembrokeshire

message: Some clarification of "external structure of Newton North parish church." might be helpful. Sorry if I am being dumb.SovalValtos (talk) 03:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  external structure 

message: Shouldn't this be titled just Bluestone National Park Resort? As a WP:NATURALDAB? DankJae 00:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:USNS Amelia Earhart

message: O.K., you silly asses, don't revert the edits that I have made, such as in  
"It will be crewed by 124 civil service mariners and, at times, will include an additional compliment," because this ship is already at sea, she already has a crew, and the future tense "will be" is totally inappropriate. 
She already has a crew, already has gone on her maiden voyage, and already has visited the shoreline of Howland Island for a wreath-laying ceremony in membrance of Earhart and Noonan!!
98.67.105.158 (talk) 03:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't you mention "military" people as part of her crew. The part of her crew who aren't civilians are naval personnel or "sailors". This distinction is even expressed in the United States Constitution, which mentions military and naval laws and regulations. The "military" part of our Armed Forces consists of members of the Army, the Air Force, the National Guard, and their reserves. The rest of our Armed Forces consists of "sailors" and "Marines". Not keeping these distinctions straight is plainly stupid! 
98.67.105.158 (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Kabney

message: Both this article and the Kira article mention an additional garment, the rachu, without any further explanation except that it is worn outside, or over, the other garments.  Can anyone enlighten us? --Eliyahu S Talk 00:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rachu? 
Talk:Carlton the Bear

message: I'm not sure how to satisfy the requirements to make this article not a stub, as it is a mascot and therefore there is not a lot more useful information out there. I tried to clean this up somewhat, adding some information and clarifying some info, as well as straightening out some awkward sentences. How long does an article have to be before it is not a "stub"? CokeBear (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Diyala campaign

message: Excellent article. I am rating it "Start" only because one of the B-class criteria is that it does not omit significant sections - as an ongoing campaign, the article cannot yet be complete. LordAmeth 16:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment
Talk:Larry the Lobster

message: no consensus to move. Relisting is unlikely to produce a consensus to move, there is weak support only and significant opposition. Andrewa (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Notability isn't the issue. The issue is that this Larry has an article and the other Larry is a redirect. Otto4711 (talk) 16:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

text: *Why exactly does a note directing those interested in the Spongebob character to the character list not sufficient? As I understand it, disambiguation pages that point to only one named article shouldn't even exist. Otto4711 (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 1

message: so Larry won the right to survive, but was killed anyway? the article is not clear to me.... Lu-igi board (talk) 16:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's exactly what happened. Uucp (talk) 14:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ???
Talk:Astronomical art

message: Space art and Astronomical art would appear to be the same thing; there's no good reason for duplicate articles. RandomCritic 21:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Caltech Intermediate Form

message: Although it is true that CIF is rarely used anymore, it was the primary method of specifying integrated-circuit chips for some time.  This description is from my book (Computer Aids for VLSI Design) which I publish free on my website.  The site gets many hits because it is still referenced.  I thought Wikipedia ought to have it, too.
Strubin 21:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:USS Falcon (MHC-59)

message: Falcon was built by Intermarine Shipbuilders of Savannah GA. LCDR Peter Fanta was the first Commanding Officer and LT Jeffrey Helfrich was the first Executive Officer. LT Andrew Tunnard was the first engineering officer, with LTJG Frank Feeney acting as operations officer and LTJG Brett Siweck as supply officer. The Chief of the Boat was ENC(SW) Timothy Paulus. Under LCDR Fanta, Falcon was commisioned in Port Arthur TX and then completed a rigorous testing cycle of the ship's sonar array as well as conducting simulated mine hunting operations off the Florida coastline.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.203.226 (talk) 05:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bathypolypus

message: Does Bathypolypus really have subspecies? Various sites I have looked at seem to accept Bathypolypus arcticus arcticus and Bathypolypus proschi as either entirely different species (Bathypolypus Bairdii, etc.) or just synonymous with B. Arcticus. Can someone pleas verify this? Thank you! TheOrangeOctopus (talk) 22:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bathypolypus Arcticus subspecies
Talk:USS Forrest Sherman (DDG-98)

message: I have about 6 or 7 pictures  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad2 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/09/politics/navy-iran-laser-ship/index.html
Notable for this ship? Hcobb (talk) 19:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  It got zapped
Talk:Velodona

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Velodona togata.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 4, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-02-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Velodona togata.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: I can't find any source that refers to V. togata as the "angel octopus". As such, it's been removed from the article. If you find a reliable source, please add it back in (and cite it). Sven Manguard Wha? 06:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angel octopus
Talk:Maximin

message: It makes sense for the saint, the Praetorian guard, Maximin of Trier, Daniel Maximin, and Maximilian Kronberger.  But Maximinus is questionable, and I don't see any good reason for Maximian or Maximianus. Are we just affixing possible misspellings?  
OckRaz (talk) 13:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "On the abdication of Diocletian and Maximian in 305, Galerius and Constantius succeeded as emperors. Galerius tried to increase his power, and after Constantius died in 306 he recognized Severus (d.307) as coemperor in the West. Severus and he attempted without success to put down the claims of Maxentius . After they were defeated and Severus was captured, Galerius had Diocletian approve the appointment of Licinius as emperor of the West. Constantius' son Constantine Constantine I and Maximin (d.313) then both claimed power."- From: The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition  
I guess that Maximinus is definitely referred to this way.OckRaz (talk) 13:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why disambig. if not actually 'Maximin'?
Talk:USS Gridley (DDG-101)

message: https://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3294490//
$40m contract award for upgrades and modifications perhaps including Mk38 Mod4 GWS to replace current 25mm? Sjhedger (talk) 10:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: are you proposing an edit to the article? - wolf 12:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - I’m rather someone does it who knows what they are doing if that’s ok? I’m a total newbie and am just pleased to provide new information as I come across it?  Sjhedger (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why I ask if you are proposing an edit. If so, then you would post it here, typically in a "please change 'X' to 'Y'" format, and insure you include enough sourcing. Then a more experienced editor will review your request and either help implement it for you, or let you know if there are problems with it. While this particular thread has a response, in the future, to ensure any requests you make get a response (eg: on low traffic articles), you can use a template such as edit request or help me. Beyond that, there is always the help desk, should you need it. - wolf 00:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrade Contract
Talk:List of music videos featuring nudity

message: Add It's Okay To Cry by SOPHIE to 2017. In the music video, SOPHIE, appearing with their visage for the first time, is naked, and their breasts are seen.
Per the Wikipedia article for Oil of Every Pearl's Uninsides - 
"The first single, "It's Okay to Cry", was released alongside a self-directed music video of Sophie, naked, singing directly to the camera in a studio setting behind digital skies and rainbow." Cordeliaoftheseas (talk) 06:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Wikipedia is not a reliable source, please cite the source directly, ideally an independent one which establishes that this is something significant.  RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  00:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 June 2021 

message: add "Year Zero" [Uncensored] by Ghost. Nudity included is by multiple actresses and an actor. actresses remove their shirts and bras displaying their breasts and then a body double of the frontman, Tobias Forge AKA Papa Emeritus II lifts his robes displaying his penis. source can be found here https://vimeo.com/62694560 136.244.39.28 (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Vimeo is not a reliable source. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2022 

message: Song: Escolhi Você
Singer: Clarice Falcão
Year: 2016
Country: Brazil
Language: Portuguese
Direct by: Pablo Monaquesi
Link reference: https://oglobo.globo.com/cultura/musica/clarice-falcao-lanca-clipe-de-eu-escolhi-voce-recheado-de-nudez-20676874 Rafanascxpt (talk) 03:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Escolhi Você - Clarice Falcão  

message: In the end of the video, you can see her buttocks while she walks away from the camera completely naked 60.53.35.158 (talk) 04:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes she did 180.74.224.214 (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leann Rimes got nude for her music video Spaceship  

message: Though quite raunchy, the video does not contain actual nudity. It should be removed from this list.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yem_iEHiyJ0 Marcoschoir (talk) 15:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frankie Goes To Hollywood - Relax (Version 1)
Talk:James W. Tate

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 21:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Police tactical group

message: PTG's are NOT used for riot/crowd control duties as one poster suggested.
Reference to the Melbourne WEF and Sydney APEC is irrelevant as neither events had PTG members performing crowd control/riot duties etc. The Victorian Special Operations Group would no-more attend a protest/crowd control situation then it would attend a motor vehicle accident etc. They do not train or equip for such duties. Crowd control and riots are dealt with (in every State) by officers trained and equipped specifically for those duties, such as the Victorian Police 'Force Response Unit' and the NSW Police 'Public Order and Riot Squad'. Both those units deal with crowd control/riots/protests etc, but neither deal with high-rish/tactical/terrorist/siege situations that PTG's deal with.  
Regarding the WEF demonstrations (http://www.ombudsman.vic.gov.au/resources/documents/Investigation_of_Police_action_at_the_World_Economic_Forum_demonstrations.pdf) Not ONE refernce is made in the alleged citation to Victorias PTG, the Special Operations Group, thus validating what I have said above.
:Who is the author of the above unsigned comments, please? Sorry, but your claim of validation lacks logic without a positive citation. I for one recall seeing media reports that TRG-type personnel were used during the over-the-top APEC security staging. Are these guys always required to go about with weapons in their hands, or are they sometimes deployed on other duties? If they have only a restricted role, what do they do during days and weeks in which they are not called out on 'counter-terrorist' and 'hostage-rescue' missions? And is it not the case that 'counter-terrorist' precautions were included in the APEC security response? I understood there were plenty of snipers around because of the presumed possibility of assassination attempts, bombings, etc. But I also understand that some overseas delegations preferred to rely on their own imported personnel rather than Australian police from various states. I guess there would be nothing new about that. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 06:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks—seen and understood. Bjenks (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Riot/crowd control duties
Talk:USS Higgins

message: This article, although an op-ed, contains some information relevant to USS Higgins. Maybe someone wants to add it? —Ynhockey (Talk) 23:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Materials 

message: Compared to the articles of all other 62 Burke class Destroyers- this one looks like it was written very unprofessionally. It is extremely disorganized and unprofessional- and should be scrapped and rewritten. Someone with knowledge of the ship needs to do so (as I do not).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.249.227.116 (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Writing Style
Talk:Specialist Response and Security

message: Those links in the reference section need to be written out in full. SGGH speak! 09:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Cotswold Wildlife Park

message: Well done for creating Costwold Wildlife Park Cparsons79 . The article looks excellent.
Ae12079410 21:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the compliment, it is my first article so it's nice to get some good feedback! Cparsons79 22:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)