lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Richie Sexson

message: I know it's a point of some contention, but he really does get called Big Sexy.  In any broadcast of a Mariners game, Dave Niehaus calls him Big Sexy at least once. --Llewdor 00:41, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Sexy 

message: I removed a lot of text because I thought it was nonencyclopedic/mundane (batting averages and strikeouts for every season he has played - if a reader is interested, his stats are available almost anywhere and linked to in the article), or overly deferential/POV (Sexson will try to improve this year, Sexson only got a small fine, etc.). --Beaker342 19:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He was designated for assignment.  He is not a free agent. Read up on what that means. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: The pictures need better placement. It looks messy right now. Suggestions? Enigma message 20:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seattle Mariners section 

message: Based on an article posted on October 26, 2023, Sexson is no longer the ThunderBolts' field manager. He stepped down and got replaced by Bobby Jenks. I made a few edits to reflect that. CiposFriend (talk) 16:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windy City ThunderBolts
Talk:Al Pitrelli

message: Version from 16:28, 28 November 2005 by 12.173.64.203 was copied verbatim from http://www.southboundbeat.com/interviews_/AlPitrelli.html  I have reverted, but perhaps the plagiarized article can provide some (properly-interpreted and/or cited) information for this one? -- Crenner 00:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The linked image of Al Pitrelli is in violation of copyright - not only is it clearly marked as copyrighted on the page it was originally lifted from, but the photographer - ME - won't license it under the terms of the GNU FDL. Sorry guys!
--Brianreichow 06:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo copyright violation 

message: I'm not gonna edit war about it, but the fact is, he's not from NYC.  He's from Hicksville.  Dlabtot (talk) 19:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine. Then put him in :Category:Guitarists from New York, don't revert and put him in :Category:Musicians from New York City. How is that any better? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al PItrelli is not from New York City 
Talk:A Game of Pool (The Twilight Zone, 1959)

message: The Orginial episode was a classic!!
The alterative episode was lame!!!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.53.145.164 (talk) 00:49, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree Dancemotron (talk) 06:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not noise, sir! I am a human being! I AM A MAN! ~ Dancemotron (talk) 03:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are also not a number, you are a free man! — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 07:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinion

message: "This is the last original Twilight Zone episode where the only characters visibly seen (Jack Klugman and Jonathan Winters) are still alive in real life (as of February 2010)."
What about episode The Last Night of a Jockey?  Mickey Rooney is still alive as of April 2010 and is the only character / actor visible in the whole episode.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.139.186.34 (talk) 21:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Comparisons of Battlefield 1942 mods

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 00:52, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: I'm pro! Makes no sense to hold a single article just for such a "highscore". --W++ 13:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Battlefield 1942]]
Talk:Tristan Nitot

message: Robert 00:58, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 

message: While the current article says that it still works at Cozy Cloud 
source: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tristan_Nitot
Tuxayo (talk) 18:34, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tristan Nitot works at Qwant since more than one year as Vice-president Advocate and since few day general director
Talk:Rochambeau

message: Every example here is of the game roshambo, which is already covered in the rock-paper-scissors article. The musical references are from California bands, or bands with Californian members, which is where roshambo, as best as anyone can figure, originated. The South Park version is just rock-paper-scissors with a punishment for losing (which apparently is common in Japan, where the game has been played long before it came to the U.S. Check out Youtube for numerous Japanese videos of Janken with punishments for losing). So why is the title a completely unrelated spelling? All of this should just be sucked up under the umbrella of rock-paper-scissors references. Promontoriumispromontorium (talk) 22:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: It's Roshambo

message: "French lycée" is redundant.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.34.53 (talk) 01:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lycee 

message: Meaning 4, a southern MS rock band, seems like a poor inclusion.  First, there is no page on wikipedia, the link is to the band's home page.  Second, the band doesn't seem to be known much outside of southern MS.  They just seem way too minor be have a wikipedia entry.  If no one protests, I'll take out their mention. --Crenner 00:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock band 

message: hahahahaha..."in the testicles" hahahahaha...86.145.173.218 18:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was around way before south park. In fact, that was the first definition I had for this term. The RockPaperScissors definition came much later. I remember people would say, if you wanted something that they wanted, "I'll Ro-Sham-Bo you for it." This is the spelling I knew, which luckily redirects here. Then they'd kick you in the nards and take whatever it was. Sad game, really. --Buddy13 19:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crotch kick
Talk:Eden (Sarah Brightman album)

message: Since it has been shown several times in the past that Gold Typhoon has been awarding certifications of their own to their own artists (such as Sarah Brightman), disregarding the official certifications by RIT, I don't think Gold Typhoon can be used as a source for RIT awards for their own artists, unless they specifically say it was awarded by RIT. As such I removed the certification until further proof is brought of this award. --Muhandes (talk) 08:03, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan certification 

message: Per MOS:CHART, "[c]harts should be arranged by country in alphabetical order" Please don't rearrange them again against the MOS. --Muhandes (talk) 20:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charts 
Talk:Faulty generalization

message: Something strange happens if you search for the author of "every generalization ... even this one" because you can not know that your result is correct without Faulty generalization and that is not only because you do not know the exact quote.
I wanted to find the first author of the quote "All generalizations are dangerous, even this one." and I did not even know the exact quote.
google only gave "Alexandre Dumas" in ONE of many, most gave "unknown author".
Searching (biased) "Dumas quotes" (and similar) gave me that same quote (his version when searched through quote databases) or any version I wanted to search for (also biased investigation by author).
The version of the quote result (everything after "every generalization is") depends on your searching method, also if author is known or unknown.
Every version seems logically valid (Faulty generalization in common sense).
yeah.this isnt a veryy good deffinition if the word.i dont even understand it.it could use some examples or something!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.130.185.216 (talk) 01:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: quote searched

message: What, exactly, is the distinction between this article and Fallacy of composition?  It seems like they both are just different terms for the same thing.  Perhaps they should be merged if so?  SnowFire (talk) 20:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also not really convinced that there's a difference between "Hasty generalization" and "Faulty generalization".  The examples described are very mildly different but I don't think there's a true distinction being made here.  SnowFire (talk) 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faulty generalization vs. Fallacy of composition
Talk:Synchronization

message: Page is a mess, mostly links to other articles. It should be rewritten or at least re-structurized. mic 21:04, February 27, 2006
:It was a very weak presentation.  I'm in the process of adding and subtracting crucial elements.  Feel free to make any changes if you are so inclined.  Dre 23:54, April 6, 2006
::Part of the problem is that some of the meanings of "synchronization" are so different that it does not make sense to handle all in one article. "Synchronous communication" redirects to here. That makes no sense. My suggestion is that the only meanings that should be treated here are those covering the (one-shot or continual) act of establishing or maintaining a common clock or clock rate for several processes. Other meanings should be referred to, either by a referral preceding the lead paragraph, or by a "See also". LambiamTalk 08:43, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: With the large See also section, this page appears to be well on it's way towards becoming a disambiguation page. I'm good with that. I think Clock synchronization can absorb the remaining specific content on this page. --Kvng (talk) 16:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Navigation and railways, Dynamical systems, Human movement, and most of the stuff in Uses sections is not related to Clock synchronization. But I assume things are in better shape than they were in 2006 when this discussion was started. ~Kvng (talk) 16:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup required

message: We want to be consistent about spelling as per WP:ENGVAR. The title of the article is Synchronization (with redirect from Synchronisation). Text in the article uses synchronisation. I'm inclined to go with the spelling in the title. Any dissent? --Kvng (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: --Kvng (talk) 23:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Synchronization vs. Synchronisation

message: The link does not take you anywhere sensible.
84.0.162.54 (talk) 08:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the link. --Kvng (talk) 17:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: timekeeping

message: Ijueputa 2803:2D60:1111:677:4DD5:3D1B:C8F3:200 (talk) 04:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ijueputa
Talk:Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport

message: Shouldn't it be 'wellbeing'? Globe-trotter (talk) 13:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  welfare? 
Talk:Cat-fox

message: Forgot to clarify on the edit summary, my edit was to clarify the statement as Borneo, Indonesia to me is a bit misleading as it suggests that Borneo is exclusively an Indonesia island Nil Einne 18:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modification 

message: Anything new on this guy? It would be good to know if it is indeed a new species, or simply a sighting of a known one. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A luwak (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus) is another species. In fact, there has been an article arguing that it is in fact some kind of flying squirrel, probably (if I'm not mistaken) Aeromys thomasi. Ucucha 14:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  News? 

message: Why cat-fox is marked as cryptid? Y~ruwiki (talk) 14:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryptids ?
Wikipedia talk:Counter Vandalism Unit/Watched

message: This is a terrible idea.  Like the oft-proposed list of unwatched pages, this will just let vandals know where they can see their defacements last for months instead of minutes. —Cryptic (talk) 01:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea or bad idea, am I the only one who finds it ever-so-slightly creepy? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 18:17, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Centennial High School (Howard County, Maryland)

message: Robert 01:22, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 

message: The reference for the CHS "placing in the top 505 high schools nationwide" does not list Centennial (see ).  Maybe this has been archived?  -74.103.79.100 (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated reference?
Talk:Flint Central High School

message: I created the image myself Flinttown (talk) 07:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I will remove this section due to it being POV and also its lack of citations.
:Smedpull (talk) 20:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mascot Controversy
Talk:Pointillé

message: Robert 01:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 

message: To start, the article appears to be very factual, even with the current length, but I would definitely recommend adding more information and sources (bring it up to around 4 or 5 at least). As for the information currently there, it's quite bare bones and the wording is a bit clunky, but I think it also makes a decent skeleton for the future. I would suggest working on smoother transitions between sentences/information and the points. I also think it wouldn't hurt to add some info on the development and evolution of the technique, as well as where the technique was more/most popular (if there are sources out there on that).
Also, in the "Common Uses of Pointille", I'm not a huge fan of how each bullet point is capitalized - I see them more as continuations of the opening sentence rather than new sentences on their own (but that's also my own personal opinion). I would also indicate the centuries of use for the second and third points for better symmetry. Another idea on these points: is it possible to be more specific on what kinds of books used this technique? My first thought was bibles, but I suppose since Europe had managed to get out of the Medieval Period by the 17th Century this might not be the case, and that it was more than just the monks with nothing better to do than write bibles all day using this. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Is it possible to find the source for the picture? I noticed that it didn't have any source attached to it and I thought that it might need one.
Overall, the information already there makes a great base for you to go off of - from here I feel that it's just the question of fleshing out the article. The information looks quite solid - the reader gets the general idea of what this is in a clear and concise manner; the sources look credible; and the set-up looks good. From here, I would look to add more information about the development of the technique, when and where it was popular (more specifically, if the information can be found), and the influences in and surrounding it possible. Good start!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elaaveg (talk • contribs) 04:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emily's Peer Review (11. March 2019)
Talk:Prefect

message: In the first sentence, shouldn't it be past participle rather than perfect participle? <KF> 01:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why are there so many bullet points? Do paragraphs work?--68.193.135.139 (talk) 06:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: The terms Pro-Prefect and Pro-President have not been used since the consistory to create cardinals on 21 February 1998. At that time 3 Pro-Prefects (Bovone, Castrillón Hoyos, and Medina Estévez) and 1 Pro-President (Antonetti) became cardinals. On 30 May 1998, then-Archbishop Saraiva Martins was named Prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints (he was eventually made a cardinal in 2001).--Dcheney (talk) 11:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro-Prefect / Pro-President
Talk:Erik Bongcam-Rudloff

message: Robert 01:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - no consensus 
Template talk:Name your images

message: This template does not make sence as of the time that I am viewing this.  I cannot understand what the point of it is.--Akako|☎ 01:38, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

message: In this template, the sentence I thought I should warn you about your mistake sounds overly stern, in my opinion. If there is no objection, I will change it into I thought I should turn your attention to a common error. --Bardak 18:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Bardak 16:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning
Talk:Radar Scope

message: "Appeal to Americans?" No one liked the game; it flopped in Japan too, but the American subsidiary ordered far too many arcade machines, causing the need to generate a new game to replace this one. Krupo 01:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That was Super Mario Bros, not DK. In the future, please format the page correctly when starting a new discussion thread. I'll move it for you. 24.218.147.30 (talk) 01:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? No, it was in fact Donkey Kong that was originally going to be a Popeye game. If I recall, King Features didn't want to give the Popeye license to Nintendo back then because Nintendo was a small company. After Nintendo had success with Donkey Kong, they did in fact get the license to make a Popeye game. (The Radar Scope thing is an entirely different matter; that was just a question of the hardware the game was going to be developed with. The original Popeye game would probably have been based on Radar Scope hardware too.) - furrykef (Talk at me) 20:26, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appeal 

message: Is it Radarscope or Radar Scope? The sources I used for Donkey Kong (arcade game) all use Radarscope. — Amcaja 16:26, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at the klov page for Radar Scope , as you can see the marquees and title screens for the game all utilize whitespace between the words. --Larsinio 16:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see why there might be confusion (the cabinet art could be read either way), but I do believe the title screen settles things. Thanks. — Amcaja 03:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Official artwork and documentation says Radar Scope, therefore, it is Radar Scope. 24.218.147.30 (talk) 01:19, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Ciepielów, Masovian Voivodeship

message: why does this town have a picture of executions that took place in the town rather then the map normally in place on such geographic city pages?  are we to assume that everyone knows exactly where it is just because some jews and poles died there? cuz I bet most ppl dont give a sh*t whether some people died there, as people die everywhere, instead people want to know where it is first, provide a map. as well there are many horrid gramtical errorsJadger 01:45, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Jadger, please cool down a bit. If you need a map of this place - go on and create it, I prepared a decent contour map and you'd only have to place a dot. As to the picture - it's there because the war crimes is why this place is famous and it illustrates the thing quite well. As to what people give a sh*t for, as you put it - we should not care. This is an encyclopedia, not a people give a sh*t for-pedia. Most people do not care whether the Earth is round or flat either. Does it mean that we should reword the article on Earth to mention the two most important facts: that on Earth you can have a decent beer and that it's a nice place to have sex - as these are the two most important things for much of the population? Halibutt 12:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The (at that time: West) German court for Nazi crimes dismissed the case (members of the German 15th Infantry Regiment (mot) had shot POWs) in 1971, explaining the dead Polish soldiers as KIA. In spite of any evidence, just some hear-say had been brought forward by prosecution.
--Dionysos 11:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The massacre

message: Two male persons in Wehrmacht uniforms (one of them carrying a rifle the other one unarmed) are seen walking around or looking at a trench with some seemingly dead people in there. Who made the photograph? At what location at what time was this photograph taken? Who are the persons in the trench?  Are they really dead? Are they Polish soldiers? Have they been murdered as POWs? Are the 2 persons wearing a Wehrmacht uniform members of the 29th Infanterie-Division or members of the Wehrmacht, anyway? Who can ensure, this photograph is not staged? Was the photograph taken even near to Ciepielów? What does this photograph prove? For what reason stands this photograph as a picture of a city/town/village?  For what purpose is this photograph published on Wiki in this context? Maybe, the persons in the trench are just drunken German soldiers, “recovering” from battle-stress. 
--Dionysos 21:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Photograph

message: There isn't a problem of POV or sources, but rather one of Mr Jadger's revisonistic crusaide. The basis of the crusaide is his unability to read German, so he isn't able to read German Wikipedia de:Massaker von Ciepielów or other sources about WWII. Xx236 09:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jadger's crusaide
Talk:Lang Park

message: I am reverting the last change as reads as if there has been a change of location. There has not.--dan, dan and dan 01:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Site of the original Lang Park ground

message: There's mention of the song about wally lewis as the emperor of lang park, but is there a mention of his statue? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.53.78.141 (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wally's statue 

message: When exactly did it become known as Suncorp Stadium and why? Perhaps some information on the important aspect of the stadium's name? Might be worth including I think.--Jeff79 08:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lang Park became Suncorp Stadium in 1994 (i dont know exact date), the reason it became this name because of it being sponsored by a company known as Suncorp, for more information see this link. SpecialWindler 10:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To confuse the story, in c. 1999 it became Suncorp-Metway Stadium due to Suncorp merging with Metropolitan Permanent, before becoming just Suncorp once more.--dan, dan and dan 12:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

text: In fact to get the dates for that last name change I mentioned, look no further than Suncorp-Metway, where it says: "The company was branded as 'Suncorp Metway' in May 1999 to reflect the merger, and to maintain goodwill and minimise the risk of losing Metway Bank customers fearing their bank had disappeared. On July 1, 2002 the company changed its name to just 'Suncorp'. Although in business aspects they are known as Suncorp, some people today still call the company "Suncorp Metway"; the registered name of the company is still Suncorp-Metway Limited.". I am feeling old that I remember it as being Metropolitan Permanent Building Society, and not Metway Bank! --dan, dan and dan 12:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: From what I can see there's no references for these figures. Personally I find this information interesting so I'm not suggesting it should be removed but would be great if we knew where it was coming from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.42.13 (talk) 05:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crowd Averages 

message: Official numbers for State of Origin game 3 put the crowd at 52,540. Clearly this cannot be the case. Timeoin (talk) 22:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crowd Capacity  

message: New Zealand beat Tahiti 1-0 in 1998 49.191.137.57 (talk) 09:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Match results