Talk:Palace of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania

message: The article is riduculously POV and needs extensive copyediting. --Ghirla -трёп- 08:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And what in particular you do not like? Sigitas 10:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why don't we call the article Ducal Palace (Vilnius), in the same style as Royal Castle (Warsaw), Summer Palace (Russia) and National Palace (Mexico)?--Jcspurrell 12:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another possibility is Vilnius Palace. We have Stockholm Palace instead of Royal Palace (Stockholm), so why not Vilnius Palace? --Ghirla -трёп- 13:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Vilnius palace was very big and complex structure. Rulers' palace is just a small part of it. See image . Rulers' palace is number 9. Sigitas 13:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: "Following independence from the USSR in 1991, Lithuanians decided to rebuild the palace, as it was considered an essential part of their national consciousness."?! Ghirla, you abuse the word "original research" but personally you invent grand theories yourself. Rebuilding this palace in Lithuania is unpopular, it is child of ego of one particular polititian Algirdas Brazauskas. Sigitas 12:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not me but Jcspurrell who added this particular sentence. --Ghirla -трёп- 13:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  SorrySigitas 13:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found this info on , but as you think it's wrong, I'll delete it immediately.  --Jcspurrell 13:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Public only collected 2% of required funds. It is mainly funded by taxes. Most of archeologists do not suppport its reconstruction and public would prefer to spend those 30 million euros on other projects. Reconstruction of this palace is quite controversial topic, I would suggest to remove this sentence. This article (sorry it is in Lithuanian)  presents views of historians who call reconstruction  a "cultural crime". I will probably create section on controversies of reconstruction. Sigitas 13:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of is POV M.K. 17:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 00:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not essential part of national consciousness 

message: So is here any objection on moving this page to Royal Palace in (or of) Vilnius? M.K. 22:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe "Rulers' Palace of the Lower Castle". This way we will not have to fight for titles anymore. Sigitas 09:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: move?

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support M.K. 22:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: While I was not aware of the controversy around building the palace, I must say that it also immediately struck me when I saw it for the first time. Why build a new "historical" building, when there are so many original buildings waiting for renovation. I'm sure Vilnius would benefit better from renovating many historic churches, palaces and other houses than building this one. --Lysytalk 14:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This issue is not the very easy; sadly article part do not mansions another "side" arguments of this matter. Maybe I write it later. The main problem is – what do with contemporary structures, which are preserved, somehow “critics”  failed to answer to this question. while yes, some historical buildings needs attention and urgently  M.K. 17:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The controversy 

message: The scheme of the whole castle is jamming article too much, is it needed in this context? M.K. 18:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scheme

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Palace of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313135715/http://www.veidas.lt/lt/leidinys.full/4268b454132fb?veidas=58a9ee0d993c7b1 to http://www.veidas.lt/lt/leidinys.full/4268b454132fb?veidas=58a9ee0d993c7b1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080205015527/http://www.ldm.lt/Muziejusirpadaliniai/Ducal_Palace.en.htm to http://www.ldm.lt/muziejusirpadaliniai/ducal_palace.en.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified