lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vasudeva

message: This article has become confused in its subject (and confused in other ways as well). Material on Vaasudeva should be in the Krishna article, or if it that article becomes too large, then it could reasonably be adde to an article titled Krishna Vaasudeva. This article should be on its original subject, that of the father of Krishna. Imc 15:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vasudeva and Vaasudeva

message: Patronymic is a name derived form a name of the father. This word is used by Hastings in his encyclopedia to describe VAsudeva. This is english Wikipedia and its preferably to use English words to describe things.. Wikidās-ॐ 11:36, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Patronymic

message: In the following Encyclopedias, Vasudeva 1st entry is about Vasudeva, father of Krishna:
* p. 520, Encyclopedia of Hinduism by Constance Jones and James Ryan
* p. 742, The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism by James Lochtefeld
* pp. 837-8, Puranic Encyclopedia by Vettam Mani
--Redtigerxyz  Talk  11:58, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vasudeva as [[WP:COMMONNAME]] 

message: നാടക കലാകൃത്ത് bhasante  ദൂതവാക്യത്തിലെ വാസുദേവനെകുറിച് 103.154.54.93 (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ധൂതവാക്യത്തിലെ വാസുദേവനെക്കുറിച്ചു 

message: According to Hindu scriptures, Vasudeva (Sanskrit: वसुदेव, IAST: Vasudeva), also called Anakadundubhi, (anakas and dundubhis both refer to drums, after the musicians who played these instruments at the time of his birth),[1][2] is the father of the Hindu deities Krishna (Vāsudeva, i.e. "son of Vasudeva"), Balarama, and Subhadra. He was a king of the Vrishnis, and a Yadava prince.[3] The son of the Yadava king Shurasena, he was also the cousin of Nanda, the foster-father of Krishna.[4][5][6] His sister Kunti was married to Pandu.
Vasudeva 2402:3A80:E41:7FAF:DA42:BBD0:4249:4833 (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  According to Hindu scriptures, Vasudeva (Sanskrit: वसुदेव, IAST: Vasudeva), also called Anakadundubhi, (anakas and dundubhis both refer to drums, after the musicians who played these instruments at the time of his birth),[1][2] is the father of the Hindu deities Krishna (Vāsudeva, i.e. "son of Vasudeva"), Balarama, and Subhadra. He was a king of the Vrishnis, and a Yadava prince.[3] The son of the Yadava king Shurasena, he was also the cousin of Nanda, the foster-father of Krishna.[4][5][6] His sister Kunti was married to Pandu.According to Hindu scriptures, Vasudeva (Sanskrit: वसुदेव, IAST: Vasudeva), also called Anakadundubhi, (anakas and dundubhis both refer to drums, after the musicians who played these instruments at the time of his birth),[1][2] is the father of the Hindu deities Krishna (Vāsudeva, i.e. "son of Vasudeva"), Balarama, and Subhadra. He was a king of the Vrishnis, and a Yadava prince.[3] The son of the Yadava king Shurasena, he was also the cousin of Nanda, the foster-father of Krishna.[4][5][6] His sister Kunti was married to Pandu.  Vasudeva
Talk:How to Get Ahead in Advertising

message: Is the revelation of the boil`s "life" a spoiler for this film?  It is hard to assess spoilage for a film that has a major plot twist early in the film.  While I recognize that it is vitally important information about the movie, I think it still constitutes a spoiler since a "blind" view will not show any indication of this weirdness until it actually happens.24.165.210.213 09:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler handling
Talk:Madhu-Kaitabha

message: I have removed this section as it needs a total rewrite. It reads as though taken directly from an English version of the myth. It's to "in-universe" to make sense to the average reader. Cheers,   Dlohcierekim  14:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed edit 
Talk:Day of Wrath

message: This film is curently showing on BBC4 (UK) as part of a tribute to the director.
It is a film about institutionalised persecution of a minority perceived as 'different', with sub-plots of love and hate, loyalty and betrayal, of using the larger situation for personal advantage...
...and it is made and released in Nazi-occupied Denmark, in 1943.
Has there been a study of the director's intention here? of the immediate reaction to the film?
Not wishing to open a can of OR worms, but if there has been such a critical appraisal, it should be mentioned in this article.
And yes, it is a good film!
John M Brear (talk) 11:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political signifcance? 

message: This article is incomplete and needs to be expanded in more detail than what it currently has. The article is missing information on the film's theatrical and home media releases which needs to be added to the article with the proper citations. Both the production and reception sections of the article are too short and need to be expanded in more detail with proper citations given for its information. These sections should contain subsections that detail the following:
=== Production ===
===== Development =====
(includes writing of the film's script)
===== Casting =====
===== Filming =====
=== Reception ===
===== Initial reception =====
(Includes reviews the film received upon its initial release)
===== Later reception =====
(Includes reviews the film later received)
All these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: ===== Initial reception =====
(Includes reviews the film received upon its initial release)
===== Later reception =====
(Includes reviews the film later received)
All these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: (Includes reviews the film later received)
All these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later reception 

message: IIRC (I saw it > 50 years ago) all the background music is variations on the "Dies Irae" ("Day of Wrath" from the Requiem Mass)James in dc (talk) 15:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music
Talk:Ordet

message: The first paragraph says that the play by Munk was of 1932, but according to this very page and the biographical page on Kaj Munk the play is of 1925. I was going to change the date but I realized that the premiere was at 1932. What should be the date for a play? I believe 1925 is better, but....Dumu Eduba (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went with 1932 for an edit, one supposes the play would have been revised before its first performance. It is more usual to go with the date of first publication, performance, release, etc. Philip Cross (talk) 18:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this article is about a movie based on the written play, I would think the first publication date the play would be the most convenient (or perhaps state both dates). --Saddhiyama (talk) 20:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of the play 
Talk:The Shop on Main Street

message: According to IMDb the language is Slovak/Czech/German.
Slovak Wiki qualifies the movie as Czech (even if turned on location in Slovakia). It was produced by Barrandov.
Xx236 07:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct Barrandov Studios was the filming location, Barrandov is an area in present day Prague, Czech Republic. John Doe or Jane Doe 11:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovak/Czech/German 

message: It's mostly in Czech with some actors speaking in slovak but I would prefer to clasify it as both because at that time much like now many people in the one/two contry(ies) speak either or both Czech and Slovak. There is only small diferances between the two languages and most people from either country can understand each other.
John Doe or Jane Doe 11:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Not a single word is in either Czech, or German." - Yet, Lautmannová says "Ich verstehe nicht" after looking through the window at the Jews rounded up on the street. Jan Winnicki * 17:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czech
Talk:The Vanishing (1988 film)

message: I removed the expansion request since no reason for adding it was provided, and the article seems to me to be at the usual level for movies. Feel free to restore it if you have a specific rationale. Rodney Boyd 01:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

message: **** you wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.70.214 (talk) 19:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers

message: Maybe a spoilers warning should be placed on this page to prevent people from learning too much of the movie?  The plot synoposis really gives it away, especially the last few sentences.  Actually, I had just rented this movie but was curious about the movie's history so I decided to come on Wikipedia to see if they had any good information on the movie.  I guess now I can return the movie since I know what happens now - I'm not blaming anyone but myself. :)  A spoiler's warning might be useful perhaps? --66.57.70.56 (talk) 19:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to still watch it regardless of spoilers! Wikipedia is generally against "Spoiler-Tags" and the such as when you read the basic plot elements of a story it is assumed that you're just going to have to find some spoilers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers warning?

message: When Rex awakens he discovers that he has been buried alive at Lemorne's country home.
Rex does find himself buried alive, but I doubt he knows his location.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.0.94.83 (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Hardly
Talk:Häxan

message: I'm going to see this film soon. The page on the director describes it as a "mockumentary", is this true? Cheers, Tompsci 01:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: how was it? MamboWiking (talk) 12:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mockumentary? 

message: Alex, you wrote: "This film has fallen into public domain as well as all other films released this year."  Which year do you mean?  The infobox shows it was released in 1922 in Sweden and 1929 in the USA.  And which copyright law are you referring to?  A fuller explanation of why the film has fallen into public domain would be welcome. Thanks. --Richardrj talk email 18:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "In the U.S., any work published before January 1, 1923 anywhere in the world is in the public domain." --AlexOvShaolin 03:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that.  Presumably, then, the sentence should specify that it is referring to US public domain (but then why no other jurisdictions?), should read 1922 rather than "this year" (to remove the ambiguity), and should include the public domain reference you cite.  I won't make these changes, though, in case you disagree with any of them. --Richardrj talk email 05:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public domain 

message: This article is missing some key points of information on the film, information on the film's reception and legacy needs to be added to the article. Also the article is missing a great deal of citations of its material which should be fixed. These issues need to be fixed in order to make the article more well developed than its current state.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion and Citation
Talk:Port of Shadows

message: Removed passage below, on three grounds. One that it contains inaccuracies, two that it is a point of view rather than encyclopedic, and three because as written it does not really fit under the heading Style:
:Carné uses a ship-in-a-bottle and Nelly's translucent raincoat as metaphors for the sense of entrapment and ephemerality. Michèle Morgan's character falls in line with Carné's theme of androgynous women (that is further emphasized in Les Visiteurs du Soir, 1942). Throughout the film Nelly wears a beret and a trenchcoat, and walks with her head bent and hands in her pockets, presenting a tomboyish variant of Gabin's uniform and gait.
Clifford Mill (talk) 11:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excision from Style section
Talk:The Last Wave

message: I've seen the film, more than once; I'm not sure at all it belongs in WikiProject Horror; it's not a horror film; more like a supernatural/mystical fantasy/revelation; ditto with Picnic at Hanging Rock if it's also listed in WP Horror.Skookum1 21:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *No one answered you, so I'll take a stab. I've long subscribed to the notion that genre films can refer to hte broad spectrum of horror/fantasy/mythological/sci-fi films. THE LAST WAVE is certainly not a "monster" or "ghost" flick (if anything, the MacGuffin is the imminent, cyclical force of natural and supernatural elements) but the twist ending certainly instills a sense of dread or horror. The element of precognitive dreams and spiritual malaise is common to horror films. Until we have a wider, more encompassing Wikiproject dealing with le cinefantastique, I think this one suffices, and THE LAST WAVE qualifies. David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 16:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not sure this is a horror film
Talk:Loves of a Blonde

message: In a personal project to get all core films out of stub class, I'll be trying to upgrade this article.  I'll be shooting for GA status, but, failing that, it would be much appreciated if someone could take a look in a week or so and give it at least a start- or c- or b- class.  Thanks. --Jburlinson (talk) 19:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  upgrade from stub class 
Talk:The Cranes Are Flying

message: :Stepan makes a speech asserting that they will never forget those who died in the war, but peace must be maintained.
When in late 2006 I saw the movie in the cinema, I remember Stepan saying either that they'd never forget those who died in the war, or instead words of hope that this kind of war would never happen ever again (or both). I wonder which was it... Granted, audio quality of the picture wasn't very good, because the film was so old and the theatre was not a cinema theatre either... -Mardus 22:31, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the ending interesting because a Hollywood film would have had the boyfriend miraculously showing up. I think the propaganda and censorship burdens were probably lighter than in Hollywood studio counterparts of that era. LADave (talk) 18:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stepan's lines at the end of the film
Talk:Ballad of a Soldier

message: Copyright to this movie was restored in 1998, Rigma America Corp. is the owner. http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/1998/63fr5141.html 68.126.151.219 (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright was restored 

message: Where in the film does it say that it is set in 1942? I don't recall that and the troops are all wearing the post-Stalingrad uniform, implying it is set no earlier than the summer of 1943. Regards, DMorpheus (talk) 15:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The only content I can see addressing timing is the scene in which the main charcter asks other soldiers for news, and one says fighting for Novorossisk is still gong on. This could place the film in late 1942- early 1943. But it's a thin reed. DMorpheus (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1942 setting?

message: I don't agree with the categorization. Nothing in the film particularly strikes me that way, and at the very end, the narrator proudly describes Alyosha as a solder, a Russian soldier. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-war film? 

message: The order of events is wrong. Shura tells Alexei that she has no one after the soap was given to Pavlov' father and just before he leaves Shura behind on his way home.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.68.92 (talk) 09:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shura's confession
Talk:George Washington (film)

message: I think that this category was attached to this article in error. I am removing. If anyone has a rationale for putting it back, please say so. KConWiki (talk) 15:22, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: George Washington category tag
Talk:Reversal of Fortune

message: This section should be removed or properly referenced. It was directly copied from a "Schott's Miscellany" 2009 calendar (Saturday June 13). It is a an identical reproduction of the text on that day.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.121.28.16 (talk) 18:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Section on Comas in Movies
Talk:Tokyo Olympiad

message: * https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2021/jul/21/how-capturing-the-small-details-at-tokyo-64-created-a-masterpiece
Quite a lot of useful info which could be added
John Cummings (talk) 21:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New reference
Talk:The Holy Mountain (1973 film)

message: "After the riot caused by the showing of Fando y Lis(1968), including a murder attempt by Emilio "El Indio" Fernandez, a Mexican film director who felt offended after watching the controversial movie at a local festival, Jodorowsky decided to leave Mexico and continue his artistic ascent in France."
--removed from the Inspiration section as this seems irrelevant here and if anything should be included on the Jodorowsky wiki page.  Also despite moving to France I believe after Fando Y Lis, first El Topo and then The Holy Mountain were both shot in Mexico. TBliss (talk) 03:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspiration

message: It has long been claimed on the internet that the Beatles were marginally involved in the production of this film, which is believable, but Jodorowsky does not seem to be commonly known among Beatlologists. Is he even mentioned in any of their biographies? I think more citations should be added. I can't read Spanish so I don't know how valid http://laclaqueta.net/2010/12/20/the-holy-mountain/ is but it doesn't look very authoritative. I'm actually not skeptical about this, but I think some proof should be found anyway. Zip-x (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Beatles Connection

message: Wondering what about the movie makes it Mexican-American? -108.43.131.46 (talk) 02:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexican-American 

message: This film is surreal not only fantasy. please edit the information. Ram nareshji (talk) 04:14, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This film is surreal not only fantasy.
Talk:Uprightness of all Sahaba (Sunni doctrine)

message: Removed "holy" a few times, changed "Prophet", "The Messenger" and the like to "Muhammad". Still needs to be checked thoroughly to bring article in line with WP:NPOV. ---Benne ['bɛnə] (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are refering to the quotes, its straight from Sunni sites, with source. If you are quoting the "shi'a view" section, it was writen by a anonymous user, and nobody has bothered fixing it. Why dont you? --Striver 11:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

text: No, dear brother, i urge you to help with the article. Give all arguements you can find for the Sunni position, and also add the sources for it. Nobody knows all the arguemnts, and nobody but a Sunni knows the Sunni position best. Ma salam. --Striver 20:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Hearts and Minds (film)

message: The title of this film not only comes from a quote by Lyndon B. Johnson, but, also, is a play off of his "Hearts and Minds" Campaign in Vietnam.  Effectively, it's kind of a détournement of a psychological warfare strategy.  To "win the hearts and minds", in terms of military strategy, is often used euphemistically for almost everything from the application of so-called "soft" power to actual psychological operations.  It's a vague an indeterminate phrase to describe converting inhabitants of an occupied region to your side, which, I think, is obvious, but, to understand why the film is called Hearts and Minds, you've got to have some sense of that it is commonly utilized as a euphemism for psychological warfare.
I'm not sure what, exactly, should be done to point this out in the article, and, so, won't edit it, but a suggestion is to include a link to the article on the "Hearts and Minds" Campaign. Daydreamdays2 (talk) 23:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Title
Talk:Hopscotch (film)

message: This article was nominated for deletion but speedy kept after withdrawal of nomination. Capitalistroadster 02:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD nomination

message: I added some information from the DVD special feature, the intro by the director and the screenwriter; putting most of it in a footnote. This might help with the notice that there aren't any references. There is a lot more information in that source that could be used to enhance this article. Friendly Person (talk) 02:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Matthau chose the soundtrack? 

message: I had written, "The credits also list "Once a Night" written by Jackie English and Beverly Bremers. This must be the loud number sung in the bar by Debra Hook with the Silversmith Band. Matthau looks like it's hurting his ears." That last part was removed, citing 'editorialization' as the reason. OK, but it's potentially valuable information about Debra Hook and the band. Can it be included with better wording? What would be the right way? Walter DOES look like it's hurting his ears. This makes sense for a guy that loves opera. This was a noisy bar down on the docks somewhere, it's intended to be a place where one might find shady characters, intrigue, clandestine charter flights. Friendly Person (talk) 03:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: I suppose this happens to a lot of films, if not now, then. We recorded Hopscotch off television for our own use. The people (Meyerson, for example) did not use foul language. We were surprised when we deliberately rented a "clearer" version for our friends and heard the language, which really was quite unnecessary to the enjoyment of the film except it does tend to make Meyerson look more stupid since he reverts to its use so often. These were not "bleeps." There were two soundtracks here. Student7 (talk) 22:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: To emphasize that Myerson was a very bad man, without loading down the film with too much evil vibes, they wrote the script to make him cuss like a criminal; but picked Ned Beatty, a pretty nice guy who does not cuss, for the part. Beatty had to practice a bit to carry it off. If I understand correctly, the studio edited a second version, with milder language dubbed in, to get a PG rating so it could be played on airline flights. Sometimes cable TV stations would play one or the other. I first saw the film at the Varsity Theater at BYU, and they'd edited the PG soundtrack even further, beeping out the very few cuss words left. Beatty's voice would speak a mixture of 'darn' and 'frikin' and <beep>, but his mouth was saying quite different words.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.2.143.28 (talk) 22:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Foul language edition?
Talk:Pépé le Moko

message: — Assignment last updated by JenniferForrest (talk) 16:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: French Poetic Realism
Talk:Jesus vs Frosty

message: In reponse to earlier editing Jesus vs Frosty is aka The Spirit of Christmas, check the offical page linked to from that article. Also watch the episode the title screen reads the spirit of christmas! Jesus vs Frosty is the name given to differentiate the two. This article is so similiar to the spirit of christmas article and due to both shorts being aka spirit of christmas i have decided to merge the articles and leave this page as a redirect. Discordance 20:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)