Talk:Protest Warrior/Archive 11

message: There seems to be a rather involved dispute here which is now spilling over into many of the administrator's noticeboards.  I was wondering if everyone involved would be interested in some informal mediation?  A few things to remember:
*I'm just another Wikipedian, but a neutral one, so I hope I can help.
*This process is entirely voluntary; anyone can opt out at any time
*No one gets sanctioned or criticised, we just want to calm down the situation and work together to write the best article possible.
Please indicate below whether or not you're interested. Shell babelfish 09:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please review the mediation section that you just archived.  The issue isn't content, it's policy violations. It's spilling over to Admin noticeboards because of a single user's personal attacks, reversions, sock puppets, etc, etc.  Usually mediation is when consensus can't be reached.  Such is not the case here.  Consensus is overwhelming except for a single user violating policy.  --Tbeatty 09:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've actually reviewed the entire archives; if you don't feel mediation will solve the problem it may be time to take further steps in dispute resolution.  Since administrators do not arbitrate content disputes, there is little that can be done by that method. Shell babelfish 10:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

text:  My good sir, I believe it was you who was just told on the admin board that my conduct hasn't been nearly as egregious as what you claim, and is not close to be a reason for banning.  If it wasn't you, but one of my other accusers - I do apologize. NBGPWS 10:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Given my review of the situation, I would suggest that you find some credible, reliable sources which discuss negative aspects of the organization first.  Having verifiable information is always a priority. Once you have a firm foundation of sources, you can then discuss balancing the article - not the other way around. Shell babelfish 10:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mediation

message: :Do you think it could be removed?
:Since the problem seems to have abated, at least temporarily.
Ruthfulbarbarity 00:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Trolling Template

message: Hi, I've tagged a source with verify credibility that contains phrases such as "FUCK YOU KFIR " that would appear to be unencyclopedic. Addhoc 13:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tagged the rest of the sources in that section. JBKramer 13:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate source 

message: I replaced this paraphrase:
Kfir, the founder of Protest Warrior, was quoted saying that the organization will be expanding its operations to counter-protest at pro-choice rallies, gay rights rallies and other rallies to show strong support for social conservatism in the future
with this quote:
Kfir, the founder of Protest Warrior, was quoted: "We're going to be protesting abortion more and more, and we'll probably get involved in the defense of marriage, too." 
It's more accurate and shorter too. 144.189.5.201 17:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote vs Paraphrase 

message: I added a link to the Command and Control forum on PW -  "The command and control center where we plan and coordinate our nationwide strike against the Left"  - As you all must have noticed by now - I've turned over a new leaf and am trying to be more helpful! NBGPWS 09:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's good to know. 
Ruthfulbarbarity 09:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: added link to Command and Control

message: Is there another Wikipedia article that follows this format? Every other article I'm aware of just lists the website under external links. Addhoc 10:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website