lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Praxis School

message: As the article is not ungrammatical or lacking in style, I am removing the cleanup tag. The user who placed the tag placed it there because, I quote, "the subject probably justifies a much larger article with a more comprehensive list of subtopics." This does not warrant a cleanup tag. At the same time, it would be great if somebody had the knowledge on the topic to contribute and expand the text, as I would like to learn more than what is readily availible in encyclopedias. Furthermore, I believe that Praxis school was one of the distinct products of the particularities of political climate in SFRY during the cold war.--Bora Nesic 15:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the Tag and Invitation for Contributions 

message: There is an article called The Praxis Group. I propose taking the useful information from there and redirecting that article toward this article (by the way, the content of that article is taken from marxists.org) (Zdravko mk 11:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree Zdravko. I have already taken most of the useful stuff. If you find anything else you believe would be useful in this article let me know. I'll also try to incorporate anything else from the Praxis Group article that I find suitable. --Bora Nesic 13:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Praxis Group
Talk:You Say Party

message: :11 keeps and 4 deletes is no consensus?  Hm. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 15:26, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no consensus to delete... and that's what I said.  Was I wrong? --W.marsh 15:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a fascinating way to do it, maybe that's how you always close them yourself.  Most of the time, a discussion that has such a clear keep contingent would be closed with a "keep" result, not "no consensus."  Leaves a rather ambiguous opening if someone wants to renominate in the future is all. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 15:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD

message: the photo used should be updated as Bruce Dyck and Jason Nicholas are no longer in the band. JonnyChance 07:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: photo
Talk:Pineview Dam

message: In the article it states that in 1935 President Truman authorized the start of the Ogden River Project. In 1935 the President was Roosevelt. Did Roosevelt authorize the Ogden River Project or was the Ogden River Project started at a later date. Hypernick1980 15:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I like that the article has the latitude and longitude coordinates for the subject of this article, but I don't see it in the source-text for the article.  Where is this information stored? Val42 17:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: I cannot find a source for the hydropower information, nor can I find anything that says Pineview Dam generates power. Is there more detailed information somewhere? 166.70.21.73 (talk) 21:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydropower
Talk:Rotavirus

message: Should I put new information about the rotaviruses under the section of epidemiology or create another section for it ? Sidhujupinder (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What new information do you want to add? Graham Beards (talk) 10:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

text: I don't think the article would be improved by adding that, but you can add you proposed text here and we can discuss this. Graham Beards (talk) 18:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  rotavirus types  

message: This is a primary study which we avoid in medical articles (see WP:MEDRS).
:
The statement is already fully supported by the Suzuki (2019) review and another citation is redundant. Graham Beards (talk) 07:38, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary study 

message: According to NCBI taxonomy and also the Matthijnssens paper (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556306/) there are several substrains of SA11, fortunately with similar antigenic signature. SCIdude (talk) 09:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are sub-strains of all rotaviruses: their genomic RNAs are polymorphic. This has been known since the 1980s. What is considered more important is their antigenicity. SA11 strains are all the same serotype. Graham Beards (talk) 10:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SA11 not a single strain
Talk:Taq-e Bostan

message: Looking at the image of "Aradashir's coronation" with the conquered king being stamped on and the priest or god being depicted on the left - the prose describes the priest as having a halo. This appears to be an interpretation rather than a description of the image - I see a wide Aztec style headpiece (similar to a stereotypical Native American chieftains feather headpiece) made from fabric which is bunched together (like hair in a pony tail) at the bottom just below the shoulder. All 3 figures have this wide fabric piece like a wide ribbon, the ribbon is clearer in other depictions from this period. To assess that the headpiece is a halo is a big step and needs some support and close analysis. Are there better images or other depictions that clearly show the Izid with a "halo" or what might be interpreted as such?
For what it's worth I think the article should read "headpiece"; you can't put bunches in a halo. 78.148.43.119 (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Izid's headpiece not a halo? 

message: This page move : page Taq-e Bostan to Taq Wa San  and subsequent insisting in it  are wrong page moves due to WP:OFFICIALNAMES .--Alborz Fallah (talk) 06:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   Wrong  page move 
Talk:2006 International cricket season

message: Question: To avoid inconsistency with International cricket in 2005, I'd prefer it if:
* a) the article was named International cricket in 2006 and
* b) that the article concerned itself with what cricket statisticians (Wisden, Cricinfo, CricketArchive etc.) determined as the 2006 season, so as to avoid overlap with International cricket in 2005-06.
It's good work - I just think it needs to be thought out a bit more... Sam Vimes 16:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Clean animals

message: I am not a specialist in this area but my feeling is that this section does not really conform NPOV and Verifiability.
First of all, the source of the text casts doubt over its neutrality, especially in a 'science study' section. (http://www.apologeticscourses.com/TextBooks/BibleScience3)
Second of all, the given references by no means cover the entire ground and are used and described in a way to make the text feel  well-founded and trustworthy.
Lastly, the referred literature works themselves can be disputed. For example, the work by Dr Macht is based on a very general, unspecific toxicological method. 
No doubt the observations are honest and correct but no specific reasons (e.g. toxins) were searched or studied and many influencing parameters were ignored. At that time, this was quite normal as biology and toxicology were not that advanced yet (e.g. DNA's structure was also discovered in 1953) but more thorough, modern studies are required before conclusions can be drawn.
Therefore i think that this section should either to be deleted or rewritten and complemented. - The real bicky 20:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV - Science Studies on unclean/clean animals
Talk:Kubb (band)

message: This band has had a single on the Radio 1 playlist, which makes them make WP:MUSIC.  Morwen - Talk 16:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the term Indie is too broad. It should be changed to Indie Rock and futhermore, would Piano Rock be a suitable term to describe Kubb's style of music? Thundermaster367 13:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indie
Talk:Tondo, Manila

message: what this means: "The former region of Tondo is over eleven hundred years old." does this mean that Tondo was established as a defined area of land 1100 years ago, with region boundaries, etc.? maybe consider revising sentence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.184.124 (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't understand 

message: Can anyone tell my why the section on the Tondo Library has nothing to do with Tondo? Is this some students at Ateneo pulling a prank? Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dotstartup (talk • contribs) 11:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tondo Library  

message: As of June 13 2008, all references to the Luzon Empire now will be deleted and Replaced with Ancient Tondo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.30.153.88 (talk) 20:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Annoucement

message: While strictly speaking Wikipedia is not a directory, someone could make a sourced List of schools in Tondo, Manila as lists of schools by locality are made frequently on Wikipedia. See List of schools in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:47, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools in Tondo 

message: Puts us in the ocean off of Africa. Jidanni (talk) 07:56, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've hidden that for the moment until someone figures out how to fix that up. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map link
Talk:Patsy Ruth Miller

message: Spent a good deal of time this morning looking for verification on Miller's supposed affairs with Valentino and Nazimova, as suggested by an anonymous updater (in point form, no less; both "red flags" as far as I'm concerned).  Could find no indication of either, and even found [], which, although a secondary source, quotes from Patsy Ruth Miller's book, explicitly states that Miller did NOT have anything more than a limited social friendship with Mr. Valentino.
As for Nazimova, I've all sorts of mysterious stories attributed to her (foreign apparently equalled exotic in the 1920s) but cannot find even the remotest hint of Miller being linked with her romantically.
I remember a few years ago reading a compendium of silent film actors' biographies (would that I could have it now or even recall its name!), one feature of which included the author asking one young starlet if it was true she detested Patsy Ruth Miller, the reply being something like "Of COURSE I did.  Nobody liked Patsy Ruth Miller."  I found this quite charming at the time and wish I could recall the rest of that book.
In any event, I've removed both aspects of her personal life for dubiousness (and given that a website I rather trust overly defies the Valentino bit), both in content and manner of update (this may have been subtle vandalism).  As per usual in my deletions, I invite anyone to post on this talk page (or MY talk page) if they know better.  Wencer 16:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life 

message: Took out the lesbian reference AGAIN (same poster).  Judging by the user contribs chart [] they're just running around posting each nutty rumour they can find, probably all from the same book or two.  I'm going to leave a message on the anonymous talk board, and probably spend a lot of this weekend checking up on everything they've been massacreing the past few days.  Sigh... Wencer 22:24, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mystery Poster
Talk:Full Auto

message: Re-edited the weapons section, and updated it with all the weapon types with a description. Also added the vehicle section with a short description and car stats (needs cleanup?). Will erase those tasks from the to-do list. --Dukester101 20:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks OK for now. All that is really needed are a couple screenshots. All I see on the Internet are old ones that lack the HUD and such. Thunderbrand 21:14, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a few good screenshots at IGN, but I'm not entirely sure how to upload them, so I'll leave it open for somebody else to add them. Also, I'll add that to the to-do list. --Dukester101 15:31, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Yesterday I added one. It was from the official site. IGN does have good ones, but they watermark them. Thunderbrand 16:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I need some of the users who can edit the Trivia that FUll Auto resembles real-life vehicles. I left out several of them, and now any of you users must add it. Professional Gamer 23:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia Added to article 

message: Hello,
as some of you may know, the internet slang term for an inexperienced user is "noob". I am playing the game myself, and the "Warlord" car is called "Noob-Zilla" and not "Nube-Zilla" online. I wanted to change this, but some guys think that "Nube-Zilla" would be correct. (Sorry if my english is not, I'm from GER.) So please change this, or let it be changed, but "Nube-Zilla" is just wrong. ;-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.192.246.70 (talk) 16:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nube-Zilla"? 
Talk:David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science

message: I'm biased (disclosure: I work for the University) but I'd like to see a mention of MFCF / ICR / CSCF and their roles in providing computer support to the School.  Any objections?  I was thinking a short paragraph in the History section.  Kraigus 16:39, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to do so.  I'm no expert at the School other than attending it, and since there wasn't a page, I figured someone should borrow the content from the school of CS site and put it here.--AlphaTwo 18:14, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

message: It looks like someone did a cut-n-paste of this page including the "(Ponzo)" which is never explained here. Needs clean up. I think it refers to the 1992 book by Peter James Ponzo Computer science at Waterloo: a history to celebrate 25 years, 1967-1992. Not good to plagiarize. W Nowicki (talk) 00:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's a "Ponzo"?
Talk:Maritime Archaic

message: Do you know how the Archaic Indians' clothing changed over time?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.151.68.192 (talk) 00:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question about Archaic Indians 

message: This is likely the same as the url already provided, but is to the print edition of the article:  Elinruby (talk) 09:21, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another article about the lack of relationship to the Beothuk people
Talk:Honeymoon registry

message: Wikpedia doesn't generally include links to commercial sites unless the article is about a specific company (e.g., article on IBM would have a link to IBM's site).  My concerns are:
* All of the links on this page are to "largest and most active honeymoon registries", which is completely subjective. At the least, how does one define "largest" or "most active"? There's no obvious cutoff point for which registries can be included, which is really an invitation to all to be included.
* They are all simply commercial sites; they are not encyclopedic material to further enlighten readers about what a honeymoon registry is. In general I believe that's against WP policy.
* Not only that, but all the links are *repeated*, in the article and again in external links.  If they MUST be here, they need to be listed only once. Repeating places unneeded emphasis.
Elf | Talk 16:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you Elf.  I zapped the commercial links.  --JereKrischel 01:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, none of those links really seems to count as a major corporation, or even necessarily a major player (after all, this is a niche business).  I've removed the links again, since each individual one is really not particularly major. I think it would be similar to having a Personal Trainer article, with links to small businesses, or a Yoga article with links to every little yoga studio.  --JereKrischel 23:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial links
Talk:Roth v. United States

message: this page needs a infobox, similar to the other SCOTUS case pages
==
Did seven justices really have weekly screenings of "obscene" material between Roth and Miller?  This seems like vandalism to me so I have added a  tag. 70.162.229.48 (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How to make a infobox? Look at Bartnicki v. Vopper Bona Fides 13:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am changing "Overruled by" Miller v. California to read "superseded."  Miller did not overrule Roth. As Chief Justice Burger wrote, "[We] reaffirm the Roth holding that obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment." Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 35 (1973).  To be more precise, Miller supersedes Roth by narrowing the scope of obscenity to sexual conduct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jblaufeld (talk • contribs) 17:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miller did not overrule Roth
Talk:Chinese Blackjack

message: I did some copyediting, but this article is barely comprehensible in its current form. It almost needs a complete rewrite because the usage is so far out of sync with what someone might write or read in standard English. I'll get to it eventually, but if you're looking for something to do before I can, have at it... Rray (talk) 22:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag
Talk:Stitch

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Stitches_%28band%29  see discussion here also. Enpsychlopedia (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 08:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

message: STITCH is the nickname of recording artist and independent music producer Steven Held. He owns and operates a recording studio in Saint Louis called THE RECOVERY ROOM. www.myspace.com/THERECOVERYROOM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.251.44.254 (talk) 18:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steven "STITCH" Held 

message: This page could re-direct to the "Stitch" disambiguation. Any thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buglethe1 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect ?? 

message: There should probably be a page, and a link here, about Network Stitching. It's a common issue when managing networks. I can't find an easy online definition, but the notion does exist https://www.google.com/search?q=network+stitching . The word is also used in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestration_%28computing%29 Jrob kiwi (talk) 09:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Network Stitching
Talk:Siim Kallas

message: This article seems a bit biased (pro-Kallas). The charges against him are not mentioned at all.
The whole article is lifted straight from his official biography on the European Commission website. So basically it is himself who has written this!!
:I have removed the section. You are encouraged to be bold and remove any obviously bad information that conflicts with Wikipedia policies, as long as you do so civilly. -- intgr 13:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are adding a blog link to the article - which is a violation of Wikipedia rules. See WP:RS, which was linked to you by the bot as well. Also, the blog post seems to be rather... shall we say, biased. --Sander Säde 12:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased

message: I removed statements without sources. If such statements are to be included in the article they must be sourced, from good sources. Ulflarsen (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed statement without source
Talk:CSX Corporation

message: Is there a reason that this needs to be separate from CSX Transportation?
:I've requested that this be merged into the "History" section of CSX Transportation, since it seems to relate little more than a bit of corporate history. Mangoe 14:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're two separate corporations. (This is the holding corp.) I'd say they should be separate MrHudson 08:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I am also in favor of merging the articles, since CSX behaves more like a corporation than a railroad. The company would spin off it's rail holdings in an instant if given the chance.-- MakeChooChooGoNow 16:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added an infoboxPaco8191 02:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  added infobox 

message: In the year now drawing to a close, CSX Corp. has been involved in some ground-breakinbg litigation over financial derivatives and their significance in re: proxy contests and the securities regulatory system. Here's one source for that statement: http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080921/REG/309229998/1015/TOC 
Anyway, I think there should definitely be a discussion of that litigation and its significance here, ans that this in itself is a good reason to keep this article separate from the article about the railroad.  The corporation as a financial entity is one subject, its operations are another. --Christofurio (talk) 16:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Litigation on derivatives 

message: Tærkast, Nothing should be anywhere in any article, especially with regard to living people, that is not reliably sourced in the body of the article.Jytdog (talk) 20:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Joseph Owens (Jesuit)

message: Two versions of the article had existed, see  when one version turned into another. Both versions have some backing by online document. The main difference is work on Rastafarian topic. Someone knowledgeable, please resolve this. Pavel Vozenilek 17:36, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No sources that there are 2 Joseph Owens so have reverted Dunderblast, we need a source for his claim otherwise it looks like trolling, SqueakBox 17:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two versions of the article 
Talk:Balurghat

message: Most of the article has been copy-pasted from some website (I read it but can't remember where), with very little rewording. Also it does not highlight the grandeurs of the town. So I would like a complete rewrite of the article. Please comment. --Soumyasch 17:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It came from here. I reverted to the article's first edit and wikified it, since the second edit was the adding of the copyrighted content. -- Kjkolb 07:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source of whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. -- P.K.Niyogi 00:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline
Talk:University of Toronto Scarborough

message: The lists are getting very long and for many the notability is not clear at all. I suspect many are self-adds and not actually worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Would it be reasonable to remove those without either a Wikipedia article about them, or at least a good reference as to why they are notable?
Eb.eric (talk) 17:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created a new article List of University of Toronto Scarborough alumni as the list was more than 50 names. Rublamb (talk) 00:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni and faculty
Talk:Delivery month

message: The month codes - where they came from? Could be an interesting story... Puzzles me a lot.
:I also want to know Bchabala2 19:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Month codes

message: Ref 1 is a dead link. ShadowOfMars (talk) 16:06, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link