Talk:The Samaritan Befrienders Hong Kong

message: The problem was finally solved. Great~! I think maybe bullet point should be avoided in Wiki page. That's why it make the page looks like advertisement~!0101angelatky06 17:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, bullet points do not make an article look like an advertisement; non-neutral wording usually does. --Geniac 18:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

text: But why after Bjelleklang had delected some of the bullet points, this page can be removed from the advertisement category? 0101angelatky06 07:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Settled down of Speedy delection

message: Actually, I would like to know why this page was categorized as an advertisement? 
I had read the quality standard of Wikipedia and the other Wiki page, I still can't figure out what wrong with this page. Can anyone briefly tell me what should we do to make the page better and meet the Wiki standard?? 0101angelatky06 18:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Respond to Speedy delection - advertisement

message: To groupmates, did you guys show the text box at the top of our page?
We should carefully modify our page again~!
By the way, please take a look of what is the Wikipedia's quality standards, I think it can really help us to make the page better.
I think that the 4th paragraph of the intorduction should be delected, because I think it's a bit sounds like greatly appreciating SBHK, what do you guys think? 0101angelatky06 20:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy delection

message: I have received the photos provided by SBHK yesterday, and I am going to post some of them to our page, hopefully, it will make our page more informative.
0101angelatky06 11:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos provided by SBHK

message: re: I think the versions now is much better, tnks so much my groupmates! so should we move the "working methods part", I think putting in the last part is quite wired. I moved it to the front, and moved the "logo" under the "background information". And I also rearrange some of the paragraphs' order. 0101zia06 03:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last day of our project! Add oil together~ 

message: Dear groupmates, I'm so exited that Mr. Kan give me a feedback call this morning.
The following are some suggestions from SBHK:
:1. If it is possible, the logo of "ALIVE", "TOUCH", "GROW" and "CARE" should be placed in notable place.
:2. Under the "Outreach program", "SKO" is not belonged to "SBHK"
And also, I have requested for some official photos of their centres and library. Hopefully, I can received them today and post it in our Wiki-page.
0101angelatky06 05:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Posting an interview could be considered original research which is frowned upon in WP and would be unsourced.  I would carefully consider what information you include.  Have your teachers Hannah and John considered that in the future, school projects should be done elsewhere that Wikipedia.  I am troubled that this might become a workspace for students. Once more, there are a number of places to create such pages.  perhaps your university should explore these options.    Montco 14:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't focus on the quality of the writing.  Nor is it necessarily important that this is a school project.  If your school project had focused on taking the article on Hong Kong and making it into a featured article, I think everyone would welcome your efforts.  More I focus on the fact that I still do not believe that the organization is notable.  Every city in the world has suicide prevention centers.  That doesn't make this one special.  While your initial efforts did smack of advertising, I would have repaired it if I felt that the article belonged here.  Again, WP is not a place for you to "tell the world" about an organization.  There are web pages for that.  It is an encyclopedia and simply cannot include every piece of information on the face of the earth.  Montco 18:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview with SBHK's Vice-Chairman Mr. Kan

message: I think it will be better if we combine all three centres in to one paragraph, and delete all the unnecessary materials, under each centre. (actually, which is also one of the suggestion from John) 0101angelatky06 07:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion on reconstruction

message: I'm trying to find news of SBHK. Every one may use "wisenews" in Dragon,type "wisenews" in Search title and enter the electronic search system. Click the button "Wisesearch" at the right top corner,and search articles of SBHK.I'm still in the process of searching.
If you already knew it,ignore this message.0101sheungyng06 05:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A place to find news

message: Dear groupmates, today I attended the tutorial and received some comments from our lecturers stated as follow:
1. The languages we used are too postive, not really writing from the NPOV. 
2. The whole wiki-page is just like a rewrite of the SBHK's web site.
3. We should balance the negative and positive things that SBHK done. 
4. Cite our sources carefully, including the pictures.
5. Too much information included in our page.
Suggestion:
1. Try to find more information out of the SBHK's web site, e.g. News article.
2. Reconstruct the content of our page so that it is more easier to read.
Add oil everybody, we still have 3 days only~! 0101angelatky06 05:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments from Hannah and John

message: To whom it may concern, the fair use images used in this article require fair use rationales. If rationales are not added, the images will be deleted in 7 days. Cheers, Fang Aili talk 17:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use images 

message: I would like to know how can I categorize the page as non-government organization, since there is an uncategorization message at the bottom of the page. 
Is that I need to officially claim that the page is NGO to Wikipedia? or Wikipeida would automatically categorize the page? 
Actually does the categorization related to the use of infobox or images etc.? 0101angelatky06 13:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You would categorize an article as a non-governmental organization by adding Category:Non-governmental organizations to the very bottom of it. However, it is more useful to find a more specific category for an article. For example, Category:Non-profit organisations based in Hong Kong. For a FAQ on categorization, see Wikipedia:Categorization FAQ. Wikipedia doesn't automatically categorize articles and no, categorization is not related to the use of infoboxes or images.Also, when added a new section to a talk page, please add it to the bottom, like this, instead of the top. Thanks. --Geniac 14:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about Categorization

message: :Image:Hk flage red.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hk flage red.gif