lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Drama queen

message: Unless SOMEONE decides to create a wiktionary entry for drama queen, I would ask the vandals around here to stop deleting this entry. It's VERY LAZY just to delete an entry here just because YOU BELIEVE it should be a wiktionary entry without actually writing an entry in wiktionary. 
What happens is when the wikipedia entry gets deleted is there is no entry in wiktionary so you have people clicking here wondering what is the meaning of the phrase 'drama queen'. There are several entries in wikipedia that actually link to drama queen and it's just a blank space.
And for the record, I don't believe drama queen should alone be a wiktionary entry (which is ironic considering there is no wiktionary entry at all) but a wikipedia entry. - 2 May 2006
* I was tempted to agree with the above, until I read the (deleted) entry in the history.  I hate to be rude, but it was a poorly-written article that was little more than a dicdef, and a bad one at that.  A good article on the subject of drama queens should:
** Define the term, giving history and etymology.  
** Give examples--preferably fictional characters (like Albin in La Cage aux Folles/Albert in The Birdcage) or dead people like Truman Capote, so not to hurt the feelings of any real-life drama queens (who would probably regard it as a big deal).
** A few references to sites like The Drama Queen Test, or Cosmopolitan's Drama Queen test, which provide appropriate context.  (I know, those aren't really reliable sources, but given the subject...)
**Cite appropriate reference (OED is always good, though they may not have "drama queen" in their lexicon), and use good Wikipedia style.
*In short, to avoid the  tag, the article should be well more than a stub, which the removed text was.  Now given the subject matter, a good article may not be possible.  However, if someone manages to write one (I don't intend to do it), it probably should be allowed to stand.  --EngineerScotty 04:06, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You do not delete an article because it is incomplete, or short. You improve it. Deleting it is poor Wikimanners, and does not help improve the project; every page started short (or most pages, at least), if users deleted every page that was a stub instead of simply improving it, we would have 12 articles. Antman -- chat 03:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 02:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-06-30 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Matt Murton

message: First off, he didn't come up with the nickname Thunder Matt, I did.  Secondly, whoever came up with the other nicknames probably isn't of the utmost concern anyway, at least not from the standpoint of mentioning it in the article.
Also since when is the consensus nickname "El Rojo"?--Ironsij0287 18:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Jacob Fahey? 

message: Think that 5 years in Japan is worth some mention in the opening paragraph.GeeBee60 (talk) 14:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanshin Tigers 
Talk:Steve Angello

message: Support split - Discography section takes up over one half of the page, and should be split to a new article entitled Steve Angello discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve Angello discography 
Talk:Wiltshire Football League Premier Division

message: *Firstly, this article is slightly different from the Wiltshire Football League article. The reason I created this specifically for the Premier Division is because the former article gives a brief overview of all the 3 divisions within this league. Also, this follows the same standards as the other leagues in the English football league system, with each division warranting its own article. The Division One and Two divisions will each have their own articles in the future as well. But I would be delighted if someone could create these two articles.
*Secondly, could someone please check the blue-linked clubs for this particular article? There seems to be a contradiction as these clubs belong to a different league. I think that these are reserve teams playing in this league but I need to be 100% sure with credible references supporting this claim. Any follow-ups in this will be greatly appreciated. --Siva1979Talk to me 08:23, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! I have unofficial conformation about these particluar teams as being the reserve sides of the clubs. However, getting more credible references would certainly verify this. --Siva1979Talk to me 15:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A few notes
Template talk:User Canada

message: I strongly disagree with making it bilingual, because it implies that everyone "from Canada" speaks french. In response to User:Instantnood's edit summary :
                    	en.wikipedia	Canada	Japan
official language(s)	English     	English
French	Japanese
In my opinion, both userboxes (Template:User Canada and Template:User Japan) should be in english only, and users who speak French or Japanese should use WP:Babel boxes instead. Alternatively, create a forkbox for bilingual Canadians. heqs 08:29, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bilingual version
Talk:Rondebosch

message: What exactly is a "fashionable" suburb?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by User:137.158.128.106 (talk • contribs) 
: Try "snobby"?  ;-)  The opening sentence with the word "fashionable" is one of the few parts of the article I didn't write... as with anything on Wikipedia, if you don't like it, you can change it.  I agree, it's not exactly an encyclopedic word. Zaian 09:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fashionable suburb

message: Is Westerford not in Newlands? Htaccess 14:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, according to my street map Rondebosch runs as far as Dean Street along the Main Road, but SACS is definitely in Newlands. Zaian 14:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:   The Westerford High School website clearly states that it is located in Rondebosch although a part of it, the playing fields of Imhof are located in Newlands and the school boarders the suburb.--Discott (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

text: The Rondebosch/Newlands boundary in the relevant area runs (according to the city council) along Alcis Road and Dean Street, and then along Main Road as far as Arbor Road. Which places Westerford School proper in Rondebosch, but Westerford's Imhoff Sports Grounds along with SACS in Newlands. (In other words, I'm confirming what Zaian and Discott have said.) - htonl (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Westerford Highschool in Rondebosch
Talk:Soyuz TMA-1

message: Isn't it the Soyuz which experienced a major failure of the guidance system and performed a ballistic entry  ? 193.56.37.1 08:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I believe you're referring to Soyuz 1 in 1967, not this mission (Soyuz TMA-1). Different spacecraft, different crew, vastly diffrent time. - Ageekgal (talk) 03:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2006
Talk:Worthing and District Football League

message: Does this league have only one division, the Worthing and District Football League Premier Division? Also I am unable to find the official website for this league. Is there a Division One for this league as well? --Siva1979Talk to me 08:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In 2004-05, the league had four divisions : Premier, One, Two & Three. The Premier Division Champions were G S K Sports. - fchd 07:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank You for the information. By the way, do you have any credible references for this on the web? Thanks again. --Siva1979Talk to me 15:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, afraid not - all I have is printed league tables, from a reputable source, of the 2004-05 season. - fchd 16:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

text: All the local Sussex leagues, although officially at Step 7, promote to the Sussex County Division Three, which is also at Step 7. It's one of the anomalies of the system. - fchd 17:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Only one division?
Talk:Thunder Force V

message: Near-certain the line heard when encountering the first boss should be 'I saw the messenger of the new god there'. Anyone? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.194.73.198 (talk) 12:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; I know cause I just finished playing TFV. Fixed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.217.246 (talk) 20:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First boss quote 
Talk:Hedwig Jagiellon (1408–1431)

message: Regarding the current naming conventions, I am most unhappy with the outcome with individuals like this person: Jadwiga herself was never known as princess and it was not used of her. Thus, the princess in her article title is an obvious anachronism. As she is also currently just a name in history books that speak about her position as a better candidate to the throne than her half-brother and practically in no other context, she is even not currently referred to as "princess". Thus, the NC requiring the use of some title before her personal name, is simply an untenable policy. The same applies to almost all medieval younger members of dynasties - the title "prince"/"princess" was not in that sort of use then, and is usually not even today for them. Shilkanni 08:48, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why exactly is she named Jadwiga of Lithuania here? She was born to a Polish-German family (tied to both Jagiellon dynasty and Piast dynasty, as a heir to the throne of Poland (and not Lithuania). Is there something I'm missing here? //Halibutt 08:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We need a disambiguation, but the 'of Lithuania' seems strange (no Google Print hits), and Jadwiga of Poland is already taken. I'd suggest renaming her to Jadwiga (1408-1431), unless some verifiable name other then 'just Jadwiga' can be produced.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  21:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OOPS!  no Google Print hits either M.K. 20:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your link, M.K. Could you respond to the question above as well? //Halibutt 10:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Jadwiga (8 April 1408 - 8 December 1431) of the House of Jagiellon was a daughter of Władysław II Jagiełło (ca. 1351-1434), King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania by his second wife Anna of Celje (1380-1416). Jadwiga received her name in honor of her deceased stepmother, Jadwiga of Poland (died in 1400) who later was canonized as saint.
If Jadwiga of Poland died in 1400, she could hardly have been the stepmother of this Jadwiga, who had a mother of her own. Or am I missing something?  qp10qp 01:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've changed it. qp10qp 00:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Something odd here
Talk:William Hickey (memoirist)

message: I will be expanding this page in the near future Sikandarji 08:49, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that never happened.  Since 2006, this article has covered just one small part of the subject's life - the first twenty years.  Are there any volunteers to write the rest of the article?  Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of article
Talk:Užupis

message: Hey, can anyone get hold of the constitution of the 'republic'? I'll try and dig it up, but if someone  has it ready...
*The first bullet point in "External links" section has link to it: . Renata 13:50, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Constitution

message: Is there any way to get in contact with the Republic of Angels or it's citizens?
Citizens Tarek Mostafa Mohamed (talk) 23:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact

message: Hello all,
I came across this page after reading a recent BBC article on Užupis and started trying to add some inline citations. While searching for them, I realised that a large portion of the page seems to be copy-pasted from this link (unless it is a Wikipedia mirror): http://uzhupisembassy.eu/. I'm going to make a first try at changing up the language a bit & adding as many sources as I can find, but any help would be very welcome!
--Gemchadur (talk) 17:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of sources, possible copy-pasting
Talk:Billy Bathgate

message: I made a seperate page for the film and cleaned up this page to focus on the novel. I'm unable to find any info at all regarding a short story about Billy's son. If you're the person who added the info or if you know where info can be found, please provide it. Thanks. MrBlondNYC 08:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: other

message: The plot summary section was a blow-by-blow account, and at more than 4,000 words, about 90% of the article, had long been marked as too long. I've replaced it with a much briefer summary from an older revision . --Tony Sidaway 02:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:U.S. Route 66 in Arizona

message: According to arizonaroads.com:
*US 66 decommissioned 1985
*but SR 66 formed 1984?
Can't find anything else :( --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 08:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm sorry a reply came 13 years after your originally inquiry, but I believe I have the answer you're looking for. US 66 was decommissioned by ADOT in 1984, but was recognized by AASHTO until 1985. Often times, states and AASHTO don't always see eye to eye with designations. Another example was the fact AASHTO recognized the eastern terminus of US 66 being at I-40 and US 666 in Sanders from 1979 to 1985, while ADOT recognized the western terminus as being at I-40 and US 93 in Kingman from 1979 to 1984. Since ADOT no longer recognized US 66 as an active US Highway starting in 1984, it made sense for SR 66 to be designated in its place from the moment ADOT recognition of US 66 ended. -MatthewAnderson707 (talk|sandbox) 22:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 comments by SPUI

message: I used some resources I've gathered for writing on other U.S. Highways in Arizona to spruce up the history a section a bit. However, I only reorganized and updated the origins of Route 66 in Arizona and the origins plus details of Historic Route 66. Because I'm currently trying to re-write the entire history section of U.S. Route 70 in Arizona to meet Featured Article status, this is as far as I'm going to take it for now. If anyone else would like to take over the improvement of this Route 66 article, by all means, please do so. I'll be busy with US 70 for the foreseeable future. I'd like to add as a final note, I also provided a new map of Route 66 as well as a KML file. Hope this helped a little. -MatthewAnderson707 (talk|sandbox) 01:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I re-wrote the entire history section to GA Article standards. When I get the chance, I plan on doing the same with the Route Description. I'm not doing this for my own personal benefit, I'm doing it because I feel like it's time US 66 got a good article. The mother road deserves her respect. -MatthewAnderson707 (talk|sandbox) 21:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major additions and partial reorganization of the history section
Talk:Tōkaidō Main Line

message: The three photos that are currently in this section need to be arranged vertically because their horizontal orientation shoves the text far over and into an immensely narrow area for the entire section. -- J44xm 09:05, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route Data photos 

message: The data doesn't make sense to me. There seem to be duplications of the line (ie Tokyo-Atami is one Tōkaidō line, but then there is another one that starts at Shinagawa which is between Tokyo and Atami, very confusing). A table would help to make things clearer, the double/triple track and company could be incorporate into the same table. Alex Sims 10:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Route Data

message: An image used here, File:TokaidoLineTokyoAreaEN.png, refers to this as the "Tohoku Line" even though it is clearly showing the Tokaido Line and all other references (including the filename itself) say Tokaido.  Can someone with more graphics skills than me fix this? -Etoile ✩ (talk) 18:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image has errors 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Corky Bucek

message: I disagree with the claim that "Corky Bucek" is too obscure a topic.  Borat mentions "Corky Bucek" often on TV appearances such as Late Night with Conan O'Brien and the MTV music awards.  He also mentions him on his own "Reportings" show.  I think the article should stay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.135.104.226 (talk • contribs) 09:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Corky Bucek means a lot for Sacha Baron Cohen's Borat fans. It would be a shame to delete it. He also has a song, presented on MTV ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W85ea5ZAcwM= ), so people looking for him, have right to find it on Wiki!
Please do not delete this page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NenoXtreme (talk • contribs) 13:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corky Bucek
Template talk:Greater Kuala Lumpur

message: I've switched the word suburbs into places. The term suburbs doesn't sound right in the template contexts. The term places will be more flexible and will be able to include everything in KL. __earth (Talk) 09:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suburbs -> Places

message: Taman Midah and Chan Sow Lin were placed on the template but it doesn't link to anywhere. Correct me if I'm wrong, the template should be used to link places that already have an article. Besides, Taman Midah is a portion of Bandar Tun Razak. Based on this i will remove the links in 3 days if there is no improvement. Zafri (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to nowhere

message: per WP:DEVIATIONS, I have removed the excessive inline-css styling of this navbox.  thank you. Frietjes (talk) 15:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overstyling
Talk:Uvula piercing

message: I nominated this to be checked up for neutrality, because despite the danger that's posed by this act, the article is written very favorably, without discussing the dangers of a piercing. I think at the very least, it should be looked at. Khargas (talk) 05:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Neutralised and verified. It was written from a biased POV in favour of piercing. Fences&Windows 00:28, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The only content in this article is a brief description and the health risks. IMO it needs some work and additional content to be labeled NPOV. Some basic needs would be further info about the first known modern piercers doing this (Jon Cobb with assistance from Paul King), explanation of the controversy surrounding the procedure within the piercing community from members of Gauntlet and APP like Michaela Grey. The article right now lacks any historical content and provides so little to readers it is difficult to call it much of anything but a brief explanation of procedure risks, while it does accurately describe those risks I doubt piercing advocates of recipients of the procedure would call this article unbiased - in this case it is the lack of information and context that is biased. See the BME/Radio interview of Jon Cobb by Shannon Larratt and Jim Ward's Running the Gauntlet for more complete coverage and insight into this highly contentious issue that is highly relevant to the social debate surrounding body modification. My uname is JaDubya93, Id like to help out a bit by contributing content to this piece as time permits. 76.111.244.85 (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: maybe there should be a section about this type of piercing and infections.   I'm wondering if there is any increase in infections just after the piercing and what the infection rate is at 30 days.   --159.178.230.248 (talk) 12:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  infection rate for uvula piercing 

message: People seriously do this? Just when I thought I'd seen every attention-seeking, moronic act there was to see some idiot goes one step further.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.18.206 (talk) 02:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow 

message: I see it's linked at the bottom, but it doesn't go to a definition or an article, but rather a disambiguation. DazzleNovak (talk) 06:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does it mean to be Thirsty?
Talk:Memnonia quadrangle

message: There appear to be thirty quadrangles. I think I'll turn this page into a list of all of them. Here's a link for now: . Marskell 09:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Because it is causing a Checkwiki error #73: "ISBN-13 with wrong checksum", I removed the ISBN from the entry:
 
An ISBN alone is not a citation; when it's invalid, it's useless. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 15:58, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad ISBN 

message: I just added some pictures and a map from NASA.  There is a great deal of information in these pictures.  I believe they should be much larger, but since I'm old I do not know how to make them larger.  Can someone out there help me?  The pictures depict how the resolution of pictures from Mars has increased in the past 50 years.JimJimmarsmars (talk) 19:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Help
Talk:Blue rinse

message: I removed "blue-rinse bomb" disambig.  Perhaps, if absolutely necessary, a link to Artemis Fowl can be worked into the text, but you shouldn't have a disambig link to a page that doesn't exist (and which would probably be deleted as WP:NN if it did). FiggyBee 09:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also it makes no sense to mix real and fictional contexts like that. Just zis Guy you know? 10:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue-rinse bomb

message: Pics or GTFO  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.172.80.35 (talk) 01:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic
Talk:IEC 60870

message: I'll add a few more lines on the companion standards; mentioning their names doesn't tell anything. - HaPi
----
La page "http://www.kalkitech.com/iec.htm" donnée en lien dans l'article est signalée comme malveillante :
http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?client=Firefox&hl=fr&site=http://www.kalkitech.com/iec.htm
Cependant comme la page "http://www.kalkitech.com/protocolgateways.htm" ne semble pas l'être je ne sais pas s'il s'agit d'un faux positif.
--80.78.0.137 (talk) 07:19, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: High school French was a generation ago, but that and Google Translate says that the above is telling us about a malicious Web site.  --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

message: Instead of a fleet of context-free stubs, let's have one stronger article that actually explains the topic, instead of a bunch of random phrases in standards-ese. How would one explain this to a barmaid, or at least someone who wasn't a lifetime member of mulitple IEC standards committees? --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:55, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, merged, and it's still no good.  Could someone please explain why anybody should care about this without sinking into a mess of acronyms and standards-ese ? --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:39, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the IEC101/103 & 104 to separate single page IEC 60870-5-10x as 60870 also contains details of TASE 1.0 and 2.0. Also provided the link of main articles here.Fahidka (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Giacomo Meyerbeer

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Poster for Le pardon de Ploërmel 1859.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 19, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-09-19. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD