Talk:Cadbury

message: Cadbury was purchased by Kraft Foods in 2010. It is 2011 and nothing has been updated here.
Furthermore, I see no evidence that the legal name of the company has "PLC" in the title. The page on Kraft's website refers to the company as "Cadbury Dairy Milk". Any help getting this all cleared up? 65.175.222.116 (talk) 01:32, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Current Companies House records (see company number 06497379) show it as "Cadbury Limited" formerly known as "Cadbury plc" before June 4th 2010. -- Cain Mosni (talk||contribs) 10:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

text: A PLC is usually the top holding Company of a group. A Ltd Company is likely to be a subsidiary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.252.139.26 (talk) 09:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Current State

message: The introductory paragraph contradicts itself as to where the company's headquarters are, with the following two statements:
"Cadbury plc...with its headquarters in, Uxbridge,London, United Kingdom" and "It is headquartered in Mayfair, City of Westminster.."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.139.137.49 (talk) 13:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's corporate site gives the location of it's Head Office as Uxbridge, but I'm not sure if that's where it's corporate headquarters are. 87.194.30.99 (talk) 23:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The registered office is a legal entity, which does not necessarily even attach to a physical presence for the company itself. It is an address for service, and could simply be a legal or accounting practice acting as proxy. -- Cain Mosni (talk||contribs) 10:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Corporate HQ was for many years at 1 Connaught Place. However, the building was constructed in the 1800s in accordance with the norm for those days, without foundations as it was on rather boggy land drained by the Tyburn, resting on a raft of oak timbers resused from "Tyburn Tree", the gallows and spectator stands of the public execution "venue". The oak rotted away and by 1980 it was clear the building was becoming unstabilised as the walls tried to drop into the void created. HQ then moved to Leconfield House on Curzon Street, recently vacated by MI5, and then back to Connaught Place, then Berkeley Square, and Uxbridge.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.252.139.26 (talk) 09:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Headquarters

message: I can see these getting very long-winded and difficult to navigate without some sort of categorisation. I think in the case of chocolate/candy, they should be divided into the different brands - namely Cadbury and Bassetts (AFAIK the Trebor brand is no longer used). Maybe sub-categories for different products made/sold in certain countries should also be made - I can think of at least 10 Cadbury products made and sold (usually) only in Ireland, for example (Moro, Dairy Milk Golden Crisp, Caramello, Tiffin, Top Deck, etc.). --Zilog Jones 21:22, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: To give you a pointer, Cadbury was never a major corporate inetgrator: acquisitions tended to be rather autonomous, for example the tensions in management between "Cadbury" and "Schweppes" people. This was partly because little attention was paid to the corporate structure, until the incomprehgensible morass resulting caused a rethink in the mid 1980s, with an informal streaming into Confectionery, Soft Drinks, and Other - which was to be disposed of. However, there was little market interest in the latter until the Company Treasurer, Martin Brailsford, and a middle-ranking Director, Paul Judge, put an MBO together. This was partly inspired by Naresh Nagrecha's creation of Rubicon, a Schweppes spin-off caused by Cadbury's lack of concern for the detail of failed projects. Paul had attracted the eye of one of the Cadbury daughters, and the resulting engagement placed him in the position of heir apparent inside the family, in a generation which was no loinger interested in making chocolate. However, his inamorata was not the only female interested in him, and the result was that he outraged the family, which was still very Quaker - the engagement was off and Paul bound elsewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.252.139.26 (talk) 09:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of products

message: Why is the title hyphenated? The company name does not seem to be. Rd232 22:34, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed dml 00:33, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Do they really make condoms ?  That seems unrelated to the rest of their products.
-- Beardo 06:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to my knowledge. I have removed it temporarily until someone shows me a site (preferably a Cadbury Schweppes' site) stating this or can at least name the BRAND. - RHeodt 23:03, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

text: No, Hershey's does not manufacture all the Cadbury's chocolate sold in the US. Cadbury Creme Eggs are made by Cadbury in Britain and distributed by Hershey's. The packaging for Cadbury Mini Eggs says that they're distributed by Hershey's, but I can't find any indication of where (or by whom) they're made. All (at least, that I'm aware of) other products are clearly marked as being manufactured by Hershey's under licence from Cadbury. 69.61.148.242 (talk) 14:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Other products

message: *I have removed the copyvio notice.  The Cadbury Schweppes article was first developed on 2 June 2002, since creation, the article has been edited nearly three hundred times.  The immediate past version of the article and the page quoted do not look anything like each other.  If there are sections of material copied, then they need to be removed, or attributed with quotation.  --A Y Arktos\talk 00:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio notice removed

message: The article says:
: [In Canada] "the chocolate bar line was rebranded in late 2005 to the UK-standard purple wrapper theme."
What?? We've had purple-wrapper Cadbury bars in Canada for a long time, so this statement is either wrong, or not clear enough. WillNL 22:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purple packaging

message: I deleted the first paragraph under the headline "Overview" because it was ridiculous, wasn't an overview, totally unencyclopedic, biased, and read like an advertisement. It said the following:
A cadbury chocolate is created with great care. How do they put in the caramel you ask? First the top of the chocolate is created. the curved top is substituted as a bowl for the caramel.  The caramel is then filled in to the chocolate as the chocolate is frozen. Therefore the caramel taken form of the chocolate withought melting. The bottom is them placed and compressed onto the caramilk chocolate giving us all that wonderous taste we love.
Seriously. Give me a break.
Kronos o 22:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias Edit

message: ... of German descent? He was German!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.176.215.243 (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Germans are generally of German descent. Kronos o (talk) 01:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: German descent

message: The Schweppes page indicates that worldwide the brand belonds to Coca-Cola. When did they acquire it ? -- Beardo (talk) 19:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Schweppes sold to Coca-Cola ?

message: From our company newsletter:
We announced that we had entered into a conditional agreement with Asahi in December, subject to a right of negotiation granted to Coca-Cola in 1999, under which it had until March this year to negotiate with us regarding a potential acquisition of the Schweppes Australia business. Coca-Cola has confirmed to us that it does not intend to pursue its right of negotiation and consequently, we have have today entered into a definitive sale and purchase agreement with Asahi for the same cash consideration as previously announced.
News Fo Sho 20 March, "Cadbury Announces Definitive Agreement to sell Schweppes Australia for £550M"
--Slashme (talk) 10:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coke won't buy Schweppes

message: It states that Cadbury is the world's largest confectionary manufacturer and I'm glad it is but there seems to be very few Cadbury products available in France, Germany or Austria when compared to products from Mars or Nestle. How can I have a Crunchie on a Friday when I can't get one for love nor money??
LewisR (talk) 17:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: France has a very different confectionery distribution structure from the UK, although the change of newstands from the traditional tabac to a more international format has opened market options not available in the 1980s, and the expat community was never a large enough market to make this kind of change viable. Horses for courses...Cadbury bought Poulain in the 1980s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.252.139.26 (talk) 10:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Availability in Europe

message: Cadbury continues to use hydrogenated oils in many of its signature products. Although trans fats are present, the nutrition labels round down the values to zero.
Just sounds like a customer service rant and is not given in any context. Any objection to removal? RaseaC (talk) 23:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is sourced, so it would be better to reword it if you don't like it (per WP:PRESERVE)--UltraMagnus (talk) 07:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I may be missing something here but I'm not sure Cadbury are doing anything wrong by rounding down, and therefore the sentence is completely irrelevant. We might aswell go ahead and say their products contain cocoa too. Also, now I've had a look through the whole article, the Executive Compensation and Accounting sections seem pretty unremarkable and as if they're written by a disgruntled employee, I think they too should be removed. RaseaC (talk) 12:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 Hydrogenation

message: Note that not all Cadbury products are Halal (see page: ), and it seems that Cadbury have not made any offical statement on Sharia Law (Why in the hell would they?). Reform or remove?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.49.121 (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cadbury and Islam

message: After a quick skimming of the article I can't find any info about that advert controversy. Where can I find more about it?  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil  13:13, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert controversy?

message: I've deleted the sentence "From inside reports the change to Palm Oil cost Cadbury, New Zealand 12 million in sales."
I spoke to the Cadbury NZ on its customer services and Corporate affairs and the information is false according to their public financial report.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozzymaker (talk • contribs) 05:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palm Oil Losses in New Zealand 

message: The first paragraph starts by saying it is the second biggest and ends by saying it is the biggest. Which one please?
Also, the 'Recent developments' section covers not so recent developments from 3 years ago and is followed by another section with even more recent developments.  Stepho  (talk) 08:40, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest or second biggest 

message: There are many instances in which the name wrongly features an apostrophe as for example - "In 1905, Cadbury's launched its Dairy Milk bar..." when it should only be applicable in such cases as is grammatically appropriate (unless I am mistaken): "Cadbury's male employees..." or "Cadbury's Dairy Milk".
Could someone please help to clear this matter, as it appears then to be more akin to Hershey's in a grammatical sense. HolyB144 (talk) 22:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct use of Cadbury name 

message: The article Cadbury UK has little content that isn't already here, and lacks references. There might be 1 or 2 lines about the factory closure that could be added here, everything else is a fork from this article. I suggest it be merged. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cadbury UK article seems to be gone and now directs to the main article. I wonder if we can also merge the Cadbury Ireland, Cadbury Adams and Cadbury India articles also, for the same reasons above. AnimatedZebra (talk) 06:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Tagged Cadbury India, Cadbury Ireland and Cadbury Adams, we will see if anyone else cares to comment. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:14, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's also a Cadbury New Zealand article. Wanna tag that also? AnimatedZebra (talk) 11:51, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Doesn't even seem to be a correct article, there's no indication on the Cadbury NZ Web site that this division is now autonomous. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest merge from [[Cadbury UK]]

message: The anon vandal does have at least one point; the list of subsidiaries is dull and conveys no information. Would it be OK to summarize this list saying "Kraft lists NNN subidiary companies with the Cadbury name in XXX countries." since a lot of these entries probably have little notability on their own. --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:35, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect it was leaked either from within the Company or one of its auditors, as it bears a remarkable similarity to a routine internal supporting document to the Consolidated Accounts I used to maintain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.252.139.26 (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: List of subsidiaries

message: The sentence "Analysts have said the fine is not material to the group, with mitigating factors limiting the fine being that the company quickly admitted its guilt and said it had been mistaken that the infection did not pose a threat to health.[69]" needs to be deleted or significantly changed.
This change needs to be made because:
- the reference source link is dead, so the sentence is unsubstantiated
- the company did not quickly admit its guilt (in fact it allegedly failed to report the incident for 6 months)
- the statement that the salmonella infection was thought not to pose a risk to health cannot reasonably be written-off as a "mistake", it was either incompetence or negligence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.176.153 (talk) 06:44, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salmonella Incident 

message: Can this article be updated to include mention of the recent controversial changes to Cadbury Crème Eggs?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.31.183.4 (talk) 19:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed regarding Cadbury Crème Eggs 

message: The reference link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadbury#cite_note-hershey-61 is incorrect.  It points to a product page rather than a history page.  Hershey's current history page doesn't mention Cadbury (or any merger/acquisition/licensing for that matter) so it can't be used to verify any claims here.  Does anyone have a link to the original content? William.h.nicholls (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link error 

message: There was spam so I decided to revert the page to its previous content. Grigrass (talk) 06:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam edit 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cadbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081006125823/http://zenobank.com:80/index.php?symbol=CBY&page=quotesearch to http://zenobank.com/index.php?symbol=CBY&page=quotesearch
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091213192026/http://www.cadburyinvestors.com:80/cadbury_ir/shareholder_services/demerger to http://www.cadburyinvestors.com/cadbury_ir/shareholder_services/demerger/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130620004213/http://www.cadbury.co.nz/About-Cadbury/News.aspx?newsID=47 to http://www.cadbury.co.nz/About-Cadbury/News.aspx?newsID=47
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130530072951/http://www.unitetheunion.com/news__events/latest_news/keep_cadbury_independent_-_u-1.aspx to http://www.unitetheunion.com/news__events/latest_news/keep_cadbury_independent_-_u-1.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110717163518/http://www.unitetheunion.com/news__events/latest_news/debt-heavy_kraft_could_put_30.aspx?lang=en-gb to http://www.unitetheunion.com/news__events/latest_news/debt-heavy_kraft_could_put_30.aspx?lang=en-gb
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081122055918/http://www.packaging-gateway.com/projects/cadbury/ to http://www.packaging-gateway.com/projects/cadbury/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101122135644/http://www.thehindubusinessline.com:80/2010/11/19/stories/2010111950270500.htm to http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/11/19/stories/2010111950270500.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111217135414/http://www.businessworld.in/index.php/NO.-22-CADBURY-INDIA.html to http://www.businessworld.in/index.php/NO.-22-CADBURY-INDIA.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150223220852/https://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20070716/tts-uk-cadbury-salmonella-a8bf950.html to http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20070716/tts-uk-cadbury-salmonella-a8bf950.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080930193316/http://www.flex-news-food.com:80/pages/19402/China/Chocolate/Food-Safety/Milk/cadbury-withdraws-china-chocolate-melamine-concern.html to http://www.flex-news-food.com/pages/19402/China/Chocolate/Food-Safety/Milk/cadbury-withdraws-china-chocolate-melamine-concern.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've been reverted on a change to specify that the company is a subsidiary of another company. Cadbury is wholly owned by another company. This isn't really controversial.  It's like Jaguar Cars being owned by Tata, or Land Rover being owned by Tata, both examples of companies owned by another company, stated right in the first sentence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:CA0D:8C00:F0A1:F40E:BA00:5A5F (talk) 08:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: subsidiary

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cadbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091219141715/http://www.unitetheunion.com:80/news__events/latest_news/keep_cadbury_independent_-_u-1.aspx to http://www.unitetheunion.com/news__events/latest_news/keep_cadbury_independent_-_u-1.aspx
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100226130935/http://www.cadbury.com:80/Pages/ContactUsNew.aspx? to http://www.cadbury.com/Pages/ContactUsNew.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cadbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091219141715/http://www.unitetheunion.com:80/news__events/latest_news/keep_cadbury_independent_-_u-1.aspx to http://www.unitetheunion.com/news__events/latest_news/keep_cadbury_independent_-_u-1.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Cadbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.unitetheunion.com:80/news__events/latest_news/keep_cadbury_independent_-_u-1.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426070736/http://annualreport2007.savills.com:80/our_work/ to http://annualreport2007.savills.com/our_work
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140527211716/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/pig-dna-tainted-cadbury/1122988.html to http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/pig-dna-tainted-cadbury/1122988.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Cadbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120313144653/http://www.cadbury.co.nz/About-Cadbury/News.aspx?newsID=47 to http://www.cadbury.co.nz/About-Cadbury/News.aspx?newsID=47
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.unitetheunion.com/news__events/latest_news/keep_cadbury_independent_-_u-1.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202012259/http://www.cadburyindia.com/cadtoday/company.asp to http://www.cadburyindia.com/cadtoday/company.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202012259/http://www.cadburyindia.com/cadtoday/company.asp to http://www.cadburyindia.com/cadtoday/company.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130322175559/http://www.cadburyindia.com/in/en/MediaCenter/CDMSilk.aspx to http://www.cadburyindia.com/IN/EN/MEDIACENTER/cdmsilk.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150509174109/http://www.mithaimaid.com/cadbury-chocolate-gifts/cadbury-silk-chocolates%2C to http://www.mithaimaid.com/cadbury-chocolate-gifts/cadbury-silk-chocolates%2C
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cadbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100209014548/http://www.ftse.com/tech_notices/2010/Q1/28579_20100202_Cadbury.jsp to http://www.ftse.com/tech_notices/2010/Q1/28579_20100202_Cadbury.jsp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cadbury.co.nz/About-Cadbury/News.aspx?newsID=47
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110304062705/http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/Kraft_Cadbury_Progress_Update.pdf to http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/Kraft_Cadbury_Progress_Update.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Cadbury were PROSECUTED not PERSECUTED over the salmonella contamination  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.65.8.220 (talk) 01:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, but why not just f ix it yoursefl next time? Meters (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect word 

message: When did the company become known as Cadbury Trebor Bassett or whatever?
Was this a merger or acuisition?
When did it buy(?) Maynards?
It's not clear, to me anyway from reading the article, when all this happened. --86.162.53.109 (talk) 11:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trebor, Bassett's and Maynard's 

message: The infobox currently uses this wordmark, with the source being Underconsideration.com. The source is a web page; it appears to belong to a graphic design firm. I can't find any evidence of this 'new' wordmark actually being in use. The Cadbury websites display the 'old' logo,Cadbury UKCadbury Chocolate NZ as does the Mondelez International website.'Our Brands' Until there is any evidence that the new logo is in use, I propose that we maintain the old logo as an illustration of the brand identity, so that we are not misleading readers. I have made this change. --Hazhk (talk) 15:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I get it now. NIKO (talk) 00:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logo? 

message: Today, as I was glancing through the headlines, it caught my eye that even the Express and Sun don't refer to Cadbury as a British Company anymore, rather it was referred to as :"The move by parent firm Mondelez International, which bought Cadbury for £11.5billion in 2010, will also secure 40 full-time, seasonal jobs." https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13953551/cadbury-to-move-all-production-of-dairy-milk-bars-back-to-uk-from-europe/.  I'm not saying that The Sun is a reliable source, far from it, but if they, the Champions of all things English, are saying Cadbury isn't English, rather owned by a multi-national, it is probably time this article followed suit.
 
For Comparison Budweiser is no longer referred to as an American Company, since it has been bought by a multi-national.  This article should follow suit.  It's incorrect to refer to Cadbury as a British company anymore. 2A02:C7F:C63A:1B00:949C:DB5D:5AE7:6FC6 (talk) 08:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Company? 

message: The "Accounting" section of the article talks about 2007 events in the present tense, and speculates about possible flow-on consequences which surely must have come and gone by now. I don't really know how to edit; just flagging this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.214.245.212 (talk) 02:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accounting Section Out of Date 

message: I want to point out that I miswrote an edit summary which might be misconstrued as libelling the company. I accidentally omitted a NOT from a phrase intended to read that the illegal treasure detecting following the launch of its Easter Egg promotion campaign in 2019 was an unintended consequence and was NOT 'incited by the company'. My aim was to make the account read less potentially libellous by prefixing the in-text word 'encouraged' with 'unintendedly'. Apologies.Cloptonson (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification of edit summary - the missing NOT

message: Cadbury probably got its chocolate from British colonies, but so far the article says nothing about the origin of Cadbury's cocoa, what happened there, who was responsible, how Cadbury shaped local politics, if reparations have ever been paid, etc.
This might also help understand the section "2022 Channel 4 Dispatches Child Labour Claims". AntennaeGalaxy (talk) 08:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonial Cadbury & origin of cocoa