lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Shawshank Redemption

message: This article has no information about home video releases except for a mention of the original rental VHS. Other articles about equally prominent movies have dedicated sections describing DVD and Blu-ray releases, including information about any differences, special content, etc. This article should too. —38.49.72.17 (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home video  

message: https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/90s/1996/BB-1996-01-06.pdf, Page 54. 
I'm feeling this is a more reliable source than the Almanac source, which lists Shawshank as No. 7. according to its own source from "Alexander and Associates/ Video Flash NY". Where does the Almanac source say top 10 in the entire United States? Billboard is nationwide, so it seemed bizarre Shawshank is only at No. 7 on video rentals for 1995. Also the preceding source from Variety explicitly mentions Shawshank as "the most rented video of 1995". What do you guys think?  Michael0986 (talk) 22:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top Video Rental of 1995 according to Billboard
Talk:Dubai

message: What territory is the area figure describing in the infobox, and what territory is the listed populations for? I'm not sure this has ever been explicitly stated anywhere in the article. The infobox gives one figure; the Demographics section gives an area of 497.1 square miles...what is all of this, and how do we standardize it so we don't have different figures for different definitions clashing with one another? Criticalthinker (talk) 06:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 

message: Tell me the answer 103.1.94.131 (talk) 02:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nepali workers in dubai since 2015 to 2024 

message: When will Dubai Visa open? 114.130.78.242 (talk) 06:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visa
Talk:Domain Name System

message: I did a cursory review of this article, and didn't find many opportunities for adding more wikilinks. Looks like some other newbies already got to it, adding links the past few days. When can this flag be removed? PhotogenicScientist (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It sure looks well-linked at this time. Removal of the flag is entirely discretionary, I'd say it's fine to remove it now. I'll probably have a look through and see if there's further improvements to be had. I'm also going to manually archive some of the ancient stuff above that hasn't auto-archived.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Needs more links" template flag removal? 

message: Please augment this article with an estimate of the total number of DNS records.
GeneThomas2 (talk) 09:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total number of entries
Talk:Whooping cough

message: and chink cough should be mentioned here as historical terms for the illness. . — LlywelynII 16:26, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: chin cough

message: The section has accumulated a random list of outbreaks. This should be replaced with a paragraph on global prevalence and trends, currently missing. 
WP:NOTEVERYTHING Bob (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outbreaks in Epidemiology section
Template talk:Nobel Prizes

message: Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia and intended for use around the world, and the English Wiki is especially important because English is the global lingua franca. The labels used in the "Criterion" category -- "African Arab Asian Black Female Latino and Hispanic Jewish" -- strike me as highly U.S.A-centric and meaningless outside of the United States. For example, Asians in Asia do not think of themselves as "Asian." They think of themselves as Han Chinese, Japanese, Indian, Pakistani, Filipino, and so on. Likewise "Hispanic/Latino." Spain is a White European country and does not identify much with its former colonies, and many Latin American countries themselves have little affinity for each other. "Hispanic/Latino" as a label holds little to no meaning outside of the United States. It seems highly presumptuous to force these U.S.-centric labels on disparate nations which do not embrace them.
I have no objection to listing Nobels by nationality and religion, which would give you roughly the same information in a more accurate and less U.S.-centric fashion, but these categories already exist in the template, so why bother including "Criterion" and the labels above as well? I suggest removing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.136.200 (talk) 12:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion: Remove the "Criterion" category

message: whats the logic in making it a footer? is it policy? Jay 08:37, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the logic behind a "series"? Nobel prizes do not follow any chronological order so there's no point in forcing it. There is also no intimate connection among the individual nobel prizes - only in relation to all nobel prizes as a whole. The footer keeps the listing out of the way. --Jiang 20:17, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand, what have these series boxes got to do with chronological order ? The boxes are meant only for listing similar articles in a particular series, isn't it. Jay 08:37, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: chronology and footer

message: Considering we've got a list currently containing Muslim and Jewish laureates, I undoubtedly believe that a list of Christian's should be added as soon as possible, given to exclude the largest worldwide religion would be a tad bit odd, wouldn't you agree? --Bartallen2 (talk) 03:18, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Noble Prize laureates 

message: Pleas make article List of atheists Nobel laureates--Kaiyr (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of atheists Nobel laureates
Talk:Prussian Trust

message: and initiated by the Landsmannschaft Ostpreußen and Landsmannschaft Schlesien
Is it real fact? I heard that the organisations stated it is private business of its members?Cautious 08:41, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The GMBH name would suggest it... Halibutt 12:13, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

text: Yup, from what I see at their page they propose some sort of restitution on a legal basis, so speaking of Eastern Germany is out of the question. Halibutt 12:13, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this the company of the "Prussian Trust" as both seem to be based in Düsseldorf? See:
* Prussian Trust (German organization) -- Encyclopaedia Britannica
* Clare Murphy WWII expulsions spectre lives on BBC online 2 August, 2004
* Poles Angered by German WWII Compensation Claims SPIEGEL Blog December 18, 2006 --PBS 13:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prussian Trust

message: Which territories exactly does this refer to? Yaan (talk) 12:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Or maybe more exactly: which Prussian territories exactly does this refer to? Yaan (talk) 12:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "territories which after World War II became parts of [...] Czechoslovakia." 
Talk:Fontanelle (album)

message: Taking out the "grunge" description was a good idea, since it's debatable whether or not it's grunge, but given that it was released around the height of the grunge phenom and probably wouldn't have been put out on a major label were it not for grunge, maybe we should mention grunge somewhere. Nareek 16:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NYPD Blue

message: I don't see how these two shows are "related" beyond the sense that they aired on the same network during the same span of years, which could be said about any pair of shows from ABC at the time.  There were no main cast members or producers/creators in common between the two shows and they never did a crossover or anything like that.  Predestiprestidigitation (talk) 10:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related shows: The Practice? 

message: The production team shows Kathy Bates as a director.....was it THE Kathy Bates, or another one? Seems like the actress would have been busy with acting roles during this time. 2603:8001:2A00:7428:BCFB:8AC6:99D7:DFC8 (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kathy Bates ?
Talk:Marie-Adélaïde, Grand Duchess of Luxembourg

message: Did she really live only 30 years, or was that the length of her reign?  If the former, that seems a bit young; perhaps cause of death should be mentioned.  If the latter, then date of death should be mentioned. Psychonaut 11:32, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The dates are correct. I do agree that when someone dies this young, a mention of the cause of death will normally be useful. According to various WWW sources, she entered an Italian nun order (perhaps that should be mentioned as well) and died at the castle in Hohenburg, but I couldn't find why. If somebody knows this piece of information, please add it. -- Jao 19:31, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause of death

message: Was she Catholic since her birth? --95.26.240.21 (talk) 11:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Many (myself included) would argue that a newborn can have no religious sentiments. She was raised as a Catholic. Surtsicna (talk) 12:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic 

message: (non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew (444) 19:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC of interest
Talk:John Malkovich

message: I really like John Malkovitch because , his role in the Nespresso ad campaign with George Clooney, it should be mentioned in the article.
When in heaven, sipping on nesspresso, sitting on a sofa, George Clooney is asking questions, and Malkovitch answered very poigniantly, "we don`t have producers here"— Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.209.12.35 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nescafe/George Clooney 

message: Everything I've read said he had one brother, Daniel (older). Someone added the sentence "He also has an identical brother named Jacek." to this page on June 12th.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreimiller (talk • contribs) 20:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd brother?
Talk:Panthéon

message: Is the initial article a necessary part of the name, or would this article better live under Panthéon? AxelBoldt 13:20, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial article necessary?

message: I changed the translation of "patrie" from "homeland" to "nation." Even though patrie etymologically means "homeland" it is meant in a more emphatic, er, nationalist sense which would indicate "nation" as a better translation. LeoDV 15:51, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: "Homeland" vs. "nation"

message: Alexandre Dumas is missing from the list of interred  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:680:8002:1E30:ED7E:343B:B610:C50D (talk) 18:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexandre Dumas is missing from the list of interred 

message: Is there a reason Marie Curie is missing from the list of the interred? Her husband is listed and said that his remains are placed with Marie's but it seems strange she does not have her own entry?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.80.239.167 (talk) 22:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marie Curie is missing from the list of interred 
Talk:Gconf-editor

message: Some of the points made in this article are plain wrong or at least controversial. I've read that controversial articles should be marked as such. How is this done?
Like so:
But well, really, you don't need that unless a subject is *REALLY* controversial, and huge flamewars have erupted in talk pages about a subject.
See say ohhhhhh fascism. Does Gconf-editor look so controversial now? Kim Bruning 13:36, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: I removed the Controversial tag, as this article is not controversial (based on wikipedia's definition of controversial, meaning that it's controversial amongst wikipedia editors, provoking arguements in the talk page and edit wars and such)  --Xyzzyplugh 23:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Controversial 

message: Is it really necessary to have an OS X-like style in the screenshot? It immediately makes the whole thing seem like a cheap rip-off imo.
* Also the text by the image is quite odd: gconf-editor on Fedora Core 2 with a Mac OS X theme, only the close, minimize, and maximize buttons are on the wrong side. I think I'll upload a screenshot with the default Clearlooks theme later today. --195.3.176.151 07:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme Style 
Talk:Abdul-Aziz al-Samarrai Mosque

message: Initial news reports emphasized two points:
*that US forces attacked a mosque
*that many people inside a mosque were killed
The obvious implication, is the biased point of view that:
#Any attack on a mosque is a violation of international law
#The US attacked a mosque.
#Therefore, the US clearly violated international law (and should be condemned!)
The number of people killed inside the mosque -- the implication is that they were "worshippers exiting after prayers" makes it a crime against humanity or similar atrocity. It was only later stories -- or paragraphs buried deeper within early stories -- which revealed that US forces came under attack from the mosque. This is the kind of reporting Wikipedia has to watch out for. Not to say that US marine officers should automatically be believed (that would be an America-centric POV, which would not be neutral). But to trumpet (a) military action on a mosque or (b) civilians killed -- with no balancing explanatian is wrong, too. It is anti-America POV, which is also not neutral. --Uncle Ed 14:07, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media reports the US forces breached the Geneva Convention
Template talk:PhilosophyTasks

message: Added to Standby list for c/e, because this article and the one on his book, Reasons and Persons, lack all phil-portal refs.  I might do some of the major editing to move text over to the book article, after I've read the book; adding the templates and categories is still a little beyond this newbie's expertise.--TJ 15:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Derek Parfit]] 

message: A change is as good as a holiday! I am going to modify the layout. My aim is to simplify, and so hopefully make the template more usable, and hence more used.
Hey, if you don't like it, tell me. Banno 21:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-jig 

message: Yes, I'm a n00b to Wikipedia - but not to publishing or academia.  I can be taught.  I am doing a lot of copyediting backlog, orphan backlog, etc in fields where I have some background.  That means I'm coming across quite a few philosophy articles, like Husserl or Kellogg Lewis or Kripke, where it is clear that they have been start class for too long.  Some are high importance.  Is there a list I'm missing, where I could have applied my efforts to those articles, however humble my efforts may be?  I do not believe Kripke should be "high importance," but if he is, someone should really work on that article.  If no work is done after years of it having tags on it, shouldn't it automatically be "low importance" (if it were important, someone would edit it, no?  am I wrong?)--Levalley (talk) 05:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do I add important tasks to the ToDo list
Talk:Perrott's Folly

message: Does anyone have a photograph of the tower? If not, I live relatively near and could get one done for the article. SandalsMan 21:51, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been meaning to for a while, but I've either been busy or the weather has been dull. Feel free to post one up! Greg Robson 20:39, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Mark

message: Also, I put "Gospel of Mark" in the list with everything else, which is the way "Gospel of Matthew|Luke|John" is handled on the relevant disambiguation pages.  Yes, I'm obsessive-compulsive about consistency. :) Jdavidb 14:37, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gospel 

message: True or false: the link to User:Mark does not belong in this dis-ambiguation page. 66.245.73.148 02:19, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This is more a relic from a long time ago when user pages did not have their own namespace, and user pages were in the main article namespace. If you find this improper, feel free to remove it. - Mark 01:58, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  True or false? 

message: The Greek – in the case of all four Gospel accounts – has kata, Latin secondo, both meaning according to. In other words [The] Good News according to .... There is a lively discussion as to the genre of the Gospels, hence their precise title, while not original but very early all the same, may be considered significant. (It is easy to see, why one often encounters of, even in scholarly writings ... it is 9 characters and 1 space shorter, and rolls better off the tongue.) Portress 03:16, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gospel title: "according to" 

message: I think this page should be split up into the disambiguation page and a page about the given name, maybe Mark (given name). According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), disambiguation pages should be kept as short as possible. Comments? --Chl 15:31, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting page up 

message: Under measurement, mark twian redirects to the writer Mark Twain. i don't believe an article exists about the measurement, and i do not posses the knowledge to creat it. will someone please correct this... Vicgp3 23:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Twain 

message: I removed the redirect which simply came back to this page.  I have put a proposal out in Ceramic Art to add a paragraph and later an article on this item.  At that time, I will edit here to put a redirect to the new paragraph. Aclayartist (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Makers mark
Talk:Ladin language

message: there more news abput the total population that speak Ladin?Bolzanobozen (talk) 15:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello 

message: Like the comparison of the Lord's Prayer, I think it would be useful to have a Latin column as well. AdrianMoss (talk) 08:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ladin, not Latin. Jtalja (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common phrases - add a Latin column
Talk:Badass (guitar bridges)

message: Sorry, I didn't have much time to work on it last night, but I feel its current state is a great improvement over the copy/pasted definition from urbandictionary.com. The subject is pretty hard to research, being such a common word, but I'll look into it. -- Skittzfbsd
This is a word in common usage in American English, but it might be a better fit at the Wiktionary. -- Storm
I restored the clean up tag and link to wiktionary.  I have also added the original research tag.  If the article does not improve soon, I will nominate it for deletion.  Movementarian 11:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "Leo" in Leo Quan was the Leo who owned Leo's Music in the East Bay.
albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally  Known as Al Gordon 18:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I worked with Glen as an apprentice. 
Talk:Swimming at the 1924 Summer Olympics

message: The facts are correct . I moved the page from "athletics" to "aquatics", since "athletics" means track and field. Andris 17:21, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it (again) to "swimming" which is more specific, and removed the "athletics" -> "aquatics" redirect which was left behind by the move. -- Chuq 04:33, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Res Gestae Divi Augusti

message: Should this move to List of Latin phrases? Jwrosenzweig 17:22, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is actually an inscription (well, a whole bunch of inscriptions) praising Augustus' deeds as emperor. It just needs to be expanded. Adam Bishop 17:24, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)

text: Done :) Adam Bishop 17:40, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent. :)  Sorry for being initially interested in moving it, the stub didn't really explain the phrase's significance.  Bravo for the expansion! Jwrosenzweig 17:47, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I have read that, in augustus's time, a denarius had the proportional value to 25 dollars, not 0.3 dollars. In terms of labour prices, 600 million denarius would be valued today as 100 billion dollars not only 200 million!--RafaelG 19:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, where did you read that? Adam Bishop 00:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the early 1th century, a unskilled worker had a daily wage of 1 denarius, compared to 180 dollars in america today. Also, a single denarius was estimated to have a PPP proportional to about 25 today's dollars, so 200 million dollars is an absurd low value to that quantity of money. --RafaelG 17:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Attempting to convert between even ca. 1800 monetary values and ca. 2000 monetary values is rather dubious at best, since at that time the cost of labor was relatively much cheaper, and many things we take for granted as part of our lives today could not then be bought at any price.  And of course, all these problems are much more severe for 2000 years ago than 200 years ago (since in ancient times the nature of the economy was even more different from today's, and we possess less detailed information).  However, the wording of the statement in the article is "parity of purchasing power of labour" (apparently attempting to avoid some of the many problems connected with attempts at finding general currency equivalence ratios). AnonMoos (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Money values 

message: Hi, I am going to reformat this section. It is pretty brutal. I mean this sentance.... "The text consists of 35 paragraphs that are conventionally grouped in four sections,[1] and a short introduction and post-mortem appendix." Adrianturcato (talk) 02:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of the Text
Talk:Large-group awareness training

message: these are quite well written and relevant:
4 LGAT techniques
5 LGATs and the Anti-Cult Movement.
All the rest of the article reads like "someone said something about the topic, heres a reference if wanna find out what they said." 89.134.199.32 (talk) 13:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  there are two sections that are actually inform the reader about WHAT an LGAT is 

message: The whole thing about Margaret Singer's report is supported by original research using primary documents. It all needs to go. —valereee (talk) 11:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGATs and the anti-cult movement
Talk:Dankmar Adler

message: Shouldn't there be an article about Adler & Sullivan that addresses the work of the firm;  and then separate biographical articles about Louis Sullivan and Dankmar Adler, each of which provides a complete biography along with information about their individual work when they were not partners.  I believe Adler was a member of a Chicago firm called "Burling & Adler" earlier in his career.  
The Sullivan article credits all the work of the firm Adler & Sullivan firm to Sullivan, yet Adler, Wright, Elmslie and others played significant roles and at times were certainly equal contributors. SeattleArch 16:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article which sdresses the work of the Firm?