Talk:Ha-Joon Chang

message: To me , this article is critical of Chang and missing out many of his important contributions. Especially the section on his Bad Samaritarians book, it is worded as if the book was not famous and well-received at all.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Rd232 talk 23:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs improvement and not by just anyone

message: I personally feel that is a worthy source enough to be listed here. As much as it is a "one-person view" is is no more biased that the earlier statements that Chang influenced a South American politician.
In any case, I'll post the link here:
Other dictionaries are better (talk) 09:20, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said in removing it: "it's not objective ranking by an institution, it's one man's opinion (and the corrections at the bottom of the list don't enhance the credibility of that opinion)", It's the opinion of John Naughton. There is no comparison with the fact of influence on Correa. Rd232 talk 11:14, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I feel it is.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 13:03, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Is what? Rd232 talk 18:45, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: it should be there.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 18:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well logically that means it should be in all the 300 biographies in Naughton's list. That clearly gives more significance to this 1 person's unsupported opinion than it warrants. (If you still disagree, try WP:3O.) Rd232 talk 22:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Still do.But leaving it cause Wikipedia has its limits.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 20:00, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 300 most influential British intellectuals

message: Is he a member of any particular college of the University? Marnanel (talk) 22:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  College 

message: While I am a total newbe, the last sentence in the writing section, "Amongst many issues, he controversially claims that "the washing machine has changed society more than the Internet" is not attributed and seems to be just opinion. The footnote link appears to be Chang's reasoning and doesn't refer to any any controversy.
Does anyone have a reference or a better description of his '23 Things' book?
Please correct me if this is the improper use of the talk page.
Joe Stockton GA US (talk) 04:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion used in last sentence on writing 

message: Substituted at 16:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ha-Joon Chang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071021032317/http://www.eluniverso.com/2007/09/23/0001/9/EC7E0CEDEA434BF99F0D401B91C87DB2.aspx to http://www.eluniverso.com/2007/09/23/0001/9/EC7E0CEDEA434BF99F0D401B91C87DB2.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060516140826/http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/chang/cv.pdf to http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/chang/cv.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007191325/http://eng.cfe.org/mboard/bbsDetail.asp?cid=mn1309270313&idx=2017 to http://eng.cfe.org/mboard/bbsDetail.asp?cid=mn1309270313&idx=2017
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified