lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SNCASO

message: "Sud-Ouest" is extremely generic (it means "South-West" in French), lots of things can be referred to, this needs to be renamed, and a dab created in its place (from the hatnote). I suggest SNCASO or Société nationale des constructions aéronautiques du sud-ouest . There is a related company article at SNCAO, so the SNCASO type name is already used for articles on Wikipedia. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 09:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have stated on a similar previous nomination, create the dab page first at Sud-Ouest (disambiguation), then request the move.  It's a warranted move but adding a long list of hatnotes could be seen as bordering on WP:POINT and is not the most elegant way to make a case. —  AjaxSmack  18:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming good faith, this seems to be more a case of not knowing the right way to do this than trying to make a point. Although I would not have done it that way, leaving it as is saves the trouble of needing an admin to move the DAB page back here. - BillCJ (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: * Support - Per nom. - BillCJ (talk) 13:02, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Google  suggest that the airplane company is not the most prominent usage of this term, from the first 100 hits. Rather, the Montreal burrough, the Cameroon province, etc, are all more prominent. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 12:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have stated on a similar previous nomination, create the dab page first at Sud-Ouest (disambiguation), then request the move.  It's a warranted move but adding a long list of hatnotes could be seen as bordering on WP:POINT and is not the most elegant way to make a case. —  AjaxSmack  18:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming good faith, this seems to be more a case of not knowing the right way to do this than trying to make a point. Although I would not have done it that way, leaving it as is saves the trouble of needing an admin to move the DAB page back here. - BillCJ (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:SNCASE

message: "Sud-Est" is extremely generic (it means "South-East" in French), lots of things can be referred to, this needs to be renamed, and a dab created in its place (from the hatnote). I suggest SNCASE or Société nationale des constructions aéronautiques du sud-est. There is a related company article at SNCAO, so the SNCASO type name is already used for articles on Wikipedia. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 10:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have stated on a similar previous nomination, create the dab page first at Sud-Est (disambiguation), then request the move.  It's a warranted move but adding a long list of hatnotes could be seen as bordering on WP:POINT and is not the most elegant way to make a case. —  AjaxSmack  18:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming good faith, this seems to be more a case of not knowing the right way to do this than trying to make a point. Although I would not have done it that way, leving it as is saves the trouble of needing an admin to move the DAB page back here. - BillCJ (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: * Support - Per nom. - BillCJ (talk) 13:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Google  suggests that the airplane company is not the most likely target, from the first 100 hits. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 12:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have stated on a similar previous nomination, create the dab page first at Sud-Est (disambiguation), then request the move.  It's a warranted move but adding a long list of hatnotes could be seen as bordering on WP:POINT and is not the most elegant way to make a case. —  AjaxSmack  18:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming good faith, this seems to be more a case of not knowing the right way to do this than trying to make a point. Although I would not have done it that way, leving it as is saves the trouble of needing an admin to move the DAB page back here. - BillCJ (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The Article currrently says "SNCASE SE-3150 Llama". The later SA 315B, developed out of the SE-3150, I have never seen called anything else but "Lama". While it is of course entirely possible, that the name of the aircraft actually was "Llama" during the times before SNCASE was merged into Sud-Aviation, I would bet against it. --BjKa (talk) 10:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Llama
Talk:Wet (magazine)

message: Seems like some of the external links no longer work?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.8.145.196 (talk) 13:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Links seem to be out of date
Talk:Malaysian passport

message: Is it against copyright rules to upload scanned images of passport covers? Because there is a Malaysian one I could do, but I don't want to do anything illegal.Gammondog 18:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Didapati berhampiran dengan rumah saya terdapar ramai orang indon bekerja tanpa ada permit.
Alamat Blok melati   markas fru , selango darul ehsan  dan juga rumah pegawai tinggi di rumah banglo serta di bolk-blok lain. diminta pihak berkuasa harus mangambil tindakan  sewajar .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.82.80.38 (talk) 07:43, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  tiada permit org indon bekerja 
Talk:Harmony (ISS module)

message: Wasn't there a first attempt to build the module in the US, and the primary structure got damaged ? or is my memory failing me ? Could someone help with the background ? Hektor 16:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prehistory of this module

message: It was affixed on October 26, 2007.  They're inside as I type this.  I'd edit the article but I'm not sure how to do the footnotey thingy.--Pittsburghmuggle 16:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, it was added that it was mated yesterday, and I added that it was entered a couple hours ago ;)  Thanks! Ariel♥Gold 16:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also once it's in its final position the article will probably see some further editing to cleanup all the "timeline" prose that is in the text. But personally i don't see much use in cleaning this up when we need to rewrite a lot of it in 2 weeks :D --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, Just a quick sentence about the date is all that's really needed for now, I agree. Ariel♥Gold 16:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: It's on!
Talk:CFC

message: ----
Well I didn't really have much to say, but my teacher is having us do a report on any enviromental issue of our choosing. My group chose air pollution. I have researched a lot on this issue, but have found very little sollutions to this problem. As a teenager, I don't know much about this issue but I have found out that air pollution is a really big problem. It is not something to be dealt with lightly. What I want to know is how can we as people keep from causing this problem to become worse. Is there any cure or any type of technology that we could come up with to help stop air pollution? I suppose not, even if there were more laws and new technology we would not be able to have everyone use the products or abide by the laws. We can't even do that now. Hardly anyone goes by the law. There is a new law out that goes into effect Jan.1 of 2007 that there will be no smoking sections in restaraunts. However, what will keep the people who smoke from going outside? This is just a little something to think about for you thinkers out there!  - R.N.A
that doesnt have much to do with cfc's but i'll bear it in mind
anyway i'm gonna remove Charlton from this cos theyre Charlton *Athletic* FC Joevsimp 10:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:ASW

message: 44  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.160.182.47 (talk) 14:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  sduajdakdekqowekawieamasdasdasdasdiamiasdsodaskdosadasodkasoasdsadkaidaskdsadksadkasdoskasodasjdasasdasodmasdmasdaskdoasdasodsodasd
Talk:Argos (satellite system)

message: "The system is fully proven and highly reliable. "
The whole first paragraph looks like some sort of marketing speech. Ideas?
In addition, it seems to be a blatant rip from , see this Google search: 
Stale Fries 18:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You left a note on this article, I just edited it, can you see if my work helps remove this note? Thank you for your time. CRS-20 (talk) 09:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:   thank you for your improvements. Unfortunately, the promotion language above ("The system is proven and reliable.") persists, plus other instances ("the most important tool"). Please see WP:SUPER. fgnievinski (talk) 14:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?
Talk:Hurst Green, Surrey

message: I would be for merging them... or we'll end up with a separate page for every subhamlet in the world.
 Hummingbird hawkmoth (talk) 13:41, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Agree with merger

message: I think that part of this is irrelevant, but don't want to delete such a small article!
The inhabitants of Holland regard it as being very distinct from Hurst Green! Why else would we have signposts on the borders of Holland?
86.174.160.17 (talk) 21:19, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose that Hurst Green, Surrey be merged into Oxted. I think that the content in the Hurst Green article can easily be explained in the context of Oxted, and the Oxted article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Hurst Green will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned.  Guidance is available in WP:UKCITIES and the degree of buffer zone must be considered. - Adam37 Talk 15:46, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. It is generally better to have one article for a civil parish. The only reference for this page at present is for the civil parish.--Charles (talk) 22:45, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Shangri-La Hotels and Resorts

message: Have started the process of converting this article from an advertorial to a fact-based article. I actually like the hotels, but this page was not neutral. I think that it is indisputable that the hotels provide a luxurious environment, but I have tried to remove some of the subjective attitude conveyed in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markbenjamin (talk • contribs) 05:58, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2010 edit

message: The article says 'founded 2012'
Is this an error or just an oddity?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.124.4.18 (talk) 22:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have boldly removed it.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:17, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded: 2012?
Talk:St Germans, Cornwall

message: Both under St German's Priory Church and at Altarnun a claim to be the largest parish is made: they cannot both be right.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 05:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference to Genuki should be a way of verifying this.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest parish?

message: The Suffragan Bishops Act 1534 includes Sayncte Germayns in Cornewell as one of the towns to have a Suffragan Bishop.  This article and Bishop of St Germans only mention one from 1905 to 1918 before the current series starting in 1974.  Surely it didn't take 370 years to get around to appointing the first one.  A quick search round the web turns up a reference to Wharton's List of Suffragan Bishops from the 18th-century but not the text itself.  Has anyone got access to this or another source for earlier Bishops or, indeed, confirmation that there weren't any?  --Cavrdg (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It would seem that it did! The list of sixteenth century suffragans in the Handbook of British Chronology doesn't list St Germans (or many of the others in the Act), the practice of appointing of Suffragans then seems to have fallen into abeyance until the modern practice was revived in 1870 according to Cripps' Law Relating to Church and Clergy. Lyndwood (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Early Suffragan Bishops
Talk:Maximilian, Hereditary Prince of Saxony

message: His full name was HRH Maximilian Maria Joseph Anton Johann Baptist Johann Evangelista Ignaz Augustin Xaver Aloys Johann Nepomuk Januar Hermenegild Agnellis Paschalis Prince of Saxony.
Moved here since it clutters up the article. Olessi 23:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full name 

message: German wikipedia calls him Thronfolger, which is generally translated "heir presumptive," not "Crown Prince."  My understanding was that "Crown Prince" (Kronprinz) was generally reserved for an heir apparent. john k (talk) 01:34, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crown Prince?
Talk:Mechthild of Magdeburg

message: This work, "", gives her feast day as October 31. November 19 is assigned to Agnes of Assisi. How can this be?--Auric  talk 19:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct feast day? 

message: The Spanish caption in commons describes "Cídipe" writing to "Aconcio". That is Cydippe/Kydippe (es), an Ancient Athenian noblewoman, writing to some Akontios. What, if any, would be her relation to Mechtchild? If there is any, it is far from evident. --Ehitaja (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The illustration 

message: I am afraid there may be some erroneous information here. There were two related persons having the same Christian name, Mechtildis in Latin, sancta Mechtildis and soror Mechtildis. This is quite clear from the title page of the 1877 edition: Sanctae Mechtildis, Virginis O.S.B. Liber Specialis Gratiae; accedit Sororis Mechtildis ejusdem Ordinis Lux Divinitatis. So this article is about sister Mechtild, author of Light of Divinity. However, all information related to the feast on 19 November (alternatively on 26 February) is likely to concern the other one (who has a separate entry). At least the Martyrologium Romanum (ed. 2004) refers to Mechtilde, as the death date is given as "ca. 1298" (p. 795). Mechthild of Magdeburg is reported to have died "c. 1282/1294". It seems likely that the Lutheran and Anglican feasts also refer to Mechtilde and not to Mechthild, but I am not 100% sure, so I am not changing the main text. I hope there will be some competent person to check that and to correct the text if needed. Ailamnos (talk) 11:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, I share your opinion. In the case of the Catholic Church, the November 19 date is certainly wrong. As far as I have been able to trace it, Mechthild of Magdeburg Is venerated as blessed on September 16 in the Diocese of Magdeburg. Some sources (for example Ökumenisches Heiligeslexikon) claim that she is also venerated in the universal Church on August 15. However information on the Lutheran and Anglican Church seems to be confirmed. Common Worship mentions „Mechtild, Béguine of Magdeburg, Mystic, 1280” and Evangelischer Namenkalender – „Mechthild von Magdeburg, Ordensfrau”. Kurapazurem (talk) 21:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible confusion of two Mechthilds on this page
Talk:Indeed

message: :note: this section has comments out of chronological  order,  in breaking with WP:TPG. Also, the section below has addt'l info on COI issues of nominator. - Anon98.92..98.92.189.245 (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote

message: This article was nominated for deletion by a competitor, CVDB.pk. I just closed it as a "speedy keep" since this was a bad faith nomination. Two of this competitor's IPs had been blocked, its spam article deleted (twice) and its domain blacklisted and this appears to have been a retaliatory act of spite against both Indeed.com and Wikipedia. See:
*MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#CVDB.pk spam (permanent link)
I reviewed Indeed.com's notability when I closed the debate. This included running a Google News archive search (187 hits) and a look at the company's media coverage page. I believe this company is likely notable however my closure of this AfD as a "speedy keep" was based on procedural grounds.
This article still reads like a company press release, however. --A. B. (talk •  contribs)  17:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete. It's shameless advertising. How do you candidate something fro deletion? I would like to do it for this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilianovaldes (talk • contribs) 02:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: indeed was invented by Connor not lauren  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.48.217 (talk) 13:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indeed.com]] 

message: most job seekers want to be able to filter out the companies that charge you for their services
IS INDEED FREE FOR JOB SEEKERS?
- Yes, it is free for job seekers
97.105.47.162 (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  do they charge for their services 
Talk:White people/Mediation/Archive1

message: I honestly wish it would be such minor issue the only aspect of the dispute going on in the White people entry. This page (that I personally prefered made a disambiguation page, though I'm a minority in that) has gone through intense POV disputes basically between a core of responsible wikipedians and a number of editors, mostly anonymous (though now I believe the page is semiprotected) that want it to fit to their "white nationalist" POVs. 
After the semiprotection, a consensus was reached and the article cleaned up and briefly consolidated. The only registered editor with that specific POV (User:Dark Tichondrias) retired from the dispute after having advocated certain version because Stormfront and another white nationalist group thought like her. Then a new user, User:Thulean, appeared out of nowhere and fully focused on this article, trying to bring it to the "racialist" POV. Naturally, other editors, including myself, reverted and commented. 
Thulean entered the discussion but did not accept compromises with the already estabilished consensus. While this discusion was going on, DarkTichondrias (another race-only focused user, btw) reappeared and started doing edits, first minor ones, then major ones under the pretext of minor ones. Thulean joined her. 
Yesterday I reverted to the consensuated version and made an RFC. --Sugaar 18:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: It's much more complex
Talk:Michael Flürscheim

message: >>"green dollar systems"
You mean greenback system? 2601:1C0:4100:4AF3:6D68:251:7E23:7E56 (talk) 01:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

message: may be found in the recent video U-Tube by Fred Harison "Rods of Steel" and the interesting comments by Edward Dodson. The relationship between the land question and fashism in pre-ww1 Germany should be a subject for greater research. Michael Flurscheim was Jewish and he was unable to influence the German government to collect the rent from the improved land values. Macrocompassion (talk) 10:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Data on This Subject 
Talk:Michael Freund (historian)

message: I think this is also the Michael Freund who was later historian in Kiel an Bonn?! You can find his publications in the German National Library (DDB) (z39.50-Gateway) with the PND 118693190. In the sixties he wrote a German History with a large circulation. Hagen Schulze today a famous historian wrote his PhD with him in Bonn. 
(data from the DDB: NORMDATEN: Personenname (118693190), Freund, Michael, Lebensdaten: |1902-1972 ) Plehn 18:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michael Holm

message: I followed the link from the stubs in "Cusco" - it's a new-age band from Germany, and the leading figures are Kristian Schultze and Michael Holm. Thus I was expecting a bit of history, then found this. 
With all due respect, this makes no sense, since Michale Holm in Cusco has been the composing many famous tunes since the late 70's, yet the link of Michael Holm leads to a teenager that was barely born in the 90's!
--
I just saw this now myself. I have been working on the 2008 updates to the Cusco article and finally decided to see what was already here on Michael Holm. This is quite disappointing, to say the least. Someone has apparently sabotaged the article, and so I have reversed all of the edits which screwed the thing up.
And yes, if anyone here knows about Michael Holm outside of Cusco, please feel free to add it. I can watch out now and make sure this doesn't heppen like this again, but there have got to be a lot of things that I don't know about Michael Holm. ONe thing I DO know, though, it that his discography is HUGE, and I'm not going to try to upload it. :)
Oh yes, and another thing. His earliest released music was actually in 1961, according to his discography. I'll probably add a note or two to his article as time goes on...
MXVN (talk) 11:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion? 

message: What does the phrase "... he even dedicated a song with Giorgio and me ..." mean?  What is the name of the song? and who performed it?  Who is "me"?98.149.97.245 (talk) 08:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giorgio and me ?
Talk:White people/Mediation/Archive2

message: AndonicO, can you check this out? Psychohistorian refuses to remove what I think is incorrect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:White_people#China   Thulean 19:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I read it, and think that perhaps a section specifically on China be made. Then you can argue about it. | AndonicO Talk 20:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to point out that Thulean first complained about a source for a statement being in the intro, then upon following your suggestion to remove that source, he turned right around and slapped the statement it supported with a  tag?
Having said that, now he's talking about, "..the reader gets to decide".  What exactly is the reader to decide here? -Psychohistorian 01:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, I don't think that there is much to decide about. The article explains different points of veiws in different places. This gives it a little bit more neutrality. For now though, please just read WP:NPOV and forget about the article; then sign your name above, and we shall begin. | AndonicO Talk 10:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Issue
Talk:Michael Kühnen

message: I remember reading an excerpt (i think Thomas Brehl, one of Kühnen's closest allies, wrote it) where the author claimed that Kühnen wasn't a homosexual and even had a long-running, semi-public relationship with a non-politically involved woman. I don't really recall any direct admittance of Kühnen where he clearly defends and embraces homosexuality and does a proper "coming out" either... 
Which is funny considering that the whole section in this article making those claims is completely unsourced too. This whole paragraph should be either supplemented with some sources or re-written.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.254.55.37 (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: All sourced now. Keresaspa (talk) 02:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Samar Habib, expert on homosexual middle-eastern women, is hardly an adequate source here. Even the German wikipedia doesn't/can't provide a definitive source for Kühnen's sexuality. Gott (talk) 15:36, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuality not confirmed, speculation
Talk:White people/Mediation/Archive3

message: ... in an obvious attempt to intimidate his opponents. 
He's now intiated an RFI against LSLM. And keeps editing and editing on his own POV the disputed article. 
This mediation can go nowhere. --Sugaar 22:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I read them, but I don't know exactly why you're showing me that. | AndonicO Talk 15:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thulean keeps harassing parties involved in this case