Talk:Shadow (psychology)

message: Wasn't it Nietzsche who first referred to the unconscious as the shadow?
update --Addition of reference 'shadow aspect' 25 Febuary 2006 by Red Supremacy
Nietzsche may well have done so. It was Jung who said it has the layered construction of suppressed thoughts above the collective unconscious. Jung also, earlier in his career, referred to it as the "negative persona".
--Darkchanter 05:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nietzsche

message: ' shadow or "shadow aspect" is a part of the unconscious mind consisting of repressed weaknesses, shortcomings, and instincts. It is 
' one of the three most recognizable archetypes, the others being the anima and animus.
This first sentence contains way too many errors. First, according to Jung, none of the archetypes come from any form of repression: archetypes "reside" in collective unconscious, which is older than our little problems that we might want to repress. Second, none of the archetypes are easily recognizable, and particularly (as the very next para explains) Shadow is difficult to see when projected to others. Lebatsnok (talk) 11:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article means by easily recognizable is that it is a Jungian concept easily recognize, where as the collective unconscious, synchronisity, mandala, mana personaliyt, ect. Might not be. Along with anima and animus they are the more "basic" Jungian ideas.Sanitycult (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repression 

message: I've just removed the 3 year-old tag about inline references, because I felt the current 32 inline references should be enough to have dealt with the issue. On the other hand I've added a edit tag for style, because the overall style is far from Wikipedia's norm. I would edit it myself, but I think the article is in need of an expert. The ellipsis without spaces and the quotations bug me the most - but I guess an overral review would be best. 201.82.135.164 (talk) 02:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags

message: I've deleted the See also section which contained links to two articles (Chöd and (A Wizard of Earthsea) which do not seem to be in any way related. Mrrhum (talk) 04:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: replaced the psych portal that was deleted--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 14:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

text: I also removed the reference to A Wizard of Earthsea in the Further Reading section. Nothing indicated why it was there or what relevance it has to the article. Carhutt (talk) 16:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted See Also section 

message: I suggest bringing politics into the picture. That is an obvious and currently very meaningful example since in America it's destroying the nation. Each political party sees the other side as evil and neither can see any fault in themselves. They can only see their own virtue. Belief in one's own virtue seems to be at the root of the problem. Maybe somebody who can write better than me can add that description to the article. Thanks. 
2600:8801:B011:300:B09F:3FEF:E7EB:2AC5 (talk) 12:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: projecting the shadow

message: — Assignment last updated by KBP98 (talk) 18:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Winter 2023

message: — Assignment last updated by ErikBen (talk) 21:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Fall 2023