lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Governor-General of Solomon Islands

message: The article says (and I have heard said elsewhere) that the G-G is "elected" by the Solomon Islands parliament.  How is this reconciled with the theory that the G-G is just a representative of the Queen?   In the article on the G-G of Papua New Guinea, it says that the G-G of that state is nominated by the parliament.  Would it be more accurate to put it this way for the Solomon Islands? --Jfruh 19:52, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Elected"?

message: :The following discussion is closed.  Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.  
:Governor-General of Solomon Islands →  – For consistency, as the definite article is used within the article titles of both Monarchy of the Solomon Islands and Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands.  06:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Requesting moves of both on the Monarchy of the Solomon Islands talk page. Thanks.  09:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
*I moved the page to the above proposed titled after the discussion was closed at Talk:Monarchy of the Solomon Islands#Requested move 30 December 2015. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 December 2015
Talk:Hurricane Katrina

message: When Hurricane Harvey’s total damage was estimated at $125 billion in 2017, why did Katrina’s total damage increase $108 billion to $125 billion? If it’s inflation, why isn’t the total damage for other destructive hurricanes like Andrew or Ivan increased. 35.130.105.90 (talk) 15:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The NHC updated Katrina’s estimate to $125B, unadjusted for inflation. With inflation, Katrina caused $155B in damage. Therefore it’s still the costliest tropical cyclone. Damage totals can be difficult to figure out, when considering all of the properties involved. Therefore it’s natural for there to be fluctuations. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 17:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Costliest tropical cyclone”
Talk:Grace Christian School

message: Nothing really stands out in this article. A lot of schools can relate to the information stated here. Additionally, this article requires major formatting, wikification and grammatical fixes. It also seems biased. Enzo Aquarius 20:28, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005-2006 comments

message: If you are considering creating articles for any of the redlinked schools, please remember that a non-highschool is not generally considered notable. I have just redirected Grace Christian School (Blacklick) to Blacklick, Ohio, after adding a sentence there to mention the school: that's the most coverage that's reasonable for a non-notable primary school. Now if it's an architecturally award-winning building (with references), or of immense historical or educational significance, that's different. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. PamD 10:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Judiciary Act

message: As the page currently stands, it is simply a list of Judiciary Acts without any cohesive info. I dont see why this cant be split into individual pages pertaining to each act. (Ignore the vfd that was an error - I was unaware of the split tag) freestylefrappe 20:32, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
=== Discussion ===
* This needs to be expanded before it's worth splitting up. Right now its a good combination of mutually relevant material. One issue -- I just fixed a few double redirects that were attempting to go to specific relevant section, e.g. Judiciary Act of 1801 was a redirect to that section in the (earlier title of) the page. Of course, this doesn't work. Given some assurance that the page is going to stay here, someone can quickly go through and actually set all links to this page to focus on the relevant act, if any. Christopher Parham (talk) 20:46, 2005 August 26 (UTC)
* While I do think that eventually this page might be split up, right now if any of the individual sections were made into an article, it would have to be listed as a stub. — DLJessup (talk) 21:16, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting this article 

message: * This needs to be expanded before it's worth splitting up. Right now its a good combination of mutually relevant material. One issue -- I just fixed a few double redirects that were attempting to go to specific relevant section, e.g. Judiciary Act of 1801 was a redirect to that section in the (earlier title of) the page. Of course, this doesn't work. Given some assurance that the page is going to stay here, someone can quickly go through and actually set all links to this page to focus on the relevant act, if any. Christopher Parham (talk) 20:46, 2005 August 26 (UTC)
* While I do think that eventually this page might be split up, right now if any of the individual sections were made into an article, it would have to be listed as a stub. — DLJessup (talk) 21:16, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:Reprivatization

message: — Assignment last updated by PeaceProsperityDemocracy (talk) 13:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: This article exclusively addresses the re-privatization of national assets. Re-privatization can also apply to the case where commons or other assets held in common ownership return to the market. This article was brought to my attention as I write Mietshäuser Syndikat and cross-link it. I plan to update this article to broaden its scope at some point in the future. DougInAMugtalk 14:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reprivatization applies to collective property which is not national
Talk:Julian Stanley

message: I've started on a new article at Julian Stanley/Temp.  I've mostly included a list of various sources I found through Google, so others can put in more info culled from those.  
--zandperl 21:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:507th Parachute Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: This was where I had my greatest confusion. Some sources had Raff coming from the 2nd Battalion of the 509th, which would be real difficult if the 509th itself was a battalion. Since the 509th was at one time the 2nd Battalion of the .... dang I am lost. I know he commanded something over there, but this is confusing. Help me, Bean, help me! --Habap 20:58, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Edson was the 509th PIB's commander when they jumped into North Africa.  The unit, just before then, was called "2nd Battalion of the 503rd PIR".  That is where "2nd Battalion" creeps in.  At Normandy, he came ashore on a LCT at Utah.  Not sure why.  He fought his way in to Ridgeway's HQ (who jumped on D-Day), and was assigned the 507th at that time. 
Any source that mentions a "2nd Battalion" of the 509th in 1944 is just wrong.  The 509th was not called that since late 1942. Beanbatch 18:56, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

text: For those wondering, Edson Raff has been found. We just hadn't updated this talk page. --Habap 18:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edson Raff and the 509th

message: This page should be moved to U.S. 507th Parachute Infantry Regiment to conform to other units in Wikipedia. WikiDon 02:42, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote no.  The unit number/name is unique.  Other units are not.  Adding "U.S." would be redundant. Beanbatch 18:33, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page should be moved

message: "In 2004, the documentary film, D-Day: Down to Earth — Return of the 507th, was released." This passive construct doesnt' tell us much. Was it a Defense Department film that "was released"? Maybe a Warner Bros. or a PBS film? Who does documentary films these days? Did the film play in theaters? That would be odd, theaters don't show many documentaries these days. I suppose the apparent credibility of the unsourced assertion is proportional to the credulity of the reader. Xientist 23:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: who made the film
Talk:Dustin Gee

message: There is no citation re the use of poppers. 15:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it's utterly trivial, could have happened to anybody, and was only reported since it was Gee. Unencyclopedic toss, and I will remove it as such. Rodhullandemu 23:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ignite (band)

message: This article needs more info, but the band appears notable.  allmusic has an article on them.  Friday (talk) 21:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup issues

message: *rearranged main body
*cleaned up some of the more obvious style faults
*added sections
*rm red links
*ext links point directly to band pages
*added  tags to statements that need sources - they may well be on the linked websites, if so - remove!
Still in need of attention as regards expanding, so have left cleanup tag on. Bubba hotep 08:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure the need for expansion is the same thing as the need for cleanup, so I deleted the cleanup tag (and also cleaned up some more). AdRock (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tasks completed

message: Please complete this article about ignite band.Electro-music 23.4.2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Electro - music (talk • contribs) 22:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete 
Talk:Louis Jolyon West

message: Misou, suppressiveperson.org is just an alias for gerryarmstrong.org, which pro-Scientology editors use frequently for copies of documents. As for it being a "dynamic URL". (e.g. http://suppressiveperson.org/spdl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=360&Itemid=40) Well, yes. So is one like http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/06/23/BAGRI7AHPQ1.DTL In fact, pretty much all non-trivial sites use dynamic URL. Some use a cgi script, some use php, some hide it under the covers, but all use it. AndroidCat 05:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now, am I supposed to be impressed by "pro-Scientology editors use frequently for copies of documents"? Gerry Armstrong is a private person, making money out of "being a victim" and his site is 100% rah-rah and his personal opinion on Scientology. Non-RS and off it goes. Got it on the dynamic URL. We are on the same page on that. Misou 06:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the only thing we really know about hism is that he killed that elephant. 205.227.165.244 (talk) 00:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: This Los Angeles Times article says West was born in Madison, Wisconsin (not Brooklyn, New York). --TheCockroach (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 08:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 

message: This article made me curious, checked by here, and was surprised not to see an entry given the article treats the MKUltra involvement as rather well established fact.
So I thought I'd give a shout out for anyone browsing by - there is now a reliable source on West's involvement with MKUltra : https://theintercept.com/2019/11/24/cia-mkultra-louis-jolyon-west
134.3.210.209 (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable source on MKUltra involvement now available
Talk:Jennifer Lopez (meteorologist)

message: How do we KNOW that she is of no relation to the REAL Jennifer Lopez? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.128.222.4 (talk • contribs) .
:We don't. I'll remove it. Ardric47 04:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides, aren't we all related to Adam and Eve, our most recent common ancestors? Including "unrelated" would first need to cite reliable sources that define "relatedness" in the first place. --Damian Yerrick (talk) 20:26, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No relation
Talk:Eric Heisserer

message: Google returns over 5000 results for this person, including several pieces in major newspapers: doesn't that merit an entry?
::Absolutely. We now have a stub, time to get cracking!Scix 07:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "which will take the series in a direction different from the previous installments."
I've read the script. No such thing occurs (nor does the reference provided indicate that it does). There's a vatiation on the theme [spoiler: a new rule is introduced that death will skip you if you substitute another's life.] 
But this is not a "different direction" it's just another attempt to cheat death -- all the films have that. Bustter (talk) 23:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  misinfo 
Talk:Prolactinoma

message: The listing of causes, other than prolactinomas, of   hyperprolactinaemia really belongs in the appropriate section of Prolactin.
The diagnosis and imaging needs to be mentioned here and will be slightly duplicated under the investigation of hyperprolactinaemia generally.  David Rubentalk 22:01, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Differential causes of hyperprolactinaemia

message: I think the pain in chest/nipples should be added as a symptom. Mamendes (talk) 17:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Symptoms

message: In some cases, prolactinomas can spread into the surrounding tissue. Juan Carlos Fernadez-Miranda at Stanford University Medical Center has papers on it: https://profiles.stanford.edu/juan-fernandez-miranda?tab=publications Aido (talk) 05:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Invasion of other tissues is rare in this pathology. It is generally considered to be a benign tumor. Just-a-can-of-beans (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tumor Spread
Talk:David Royle

message: This article was nominated for deletion on 19 August 2005. The result was: no consensus, so keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Manchester councillors. -- Eugene van der Pijll 22:01, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As already noted on the talk page David Royle is the name of an actor who plays a recurring major character in the Dalziel and Pascoe television adaptation. I see that this article redirects to Fallowfield on the basis of a councillor for Fallowfield ward also being called David Royle. This redirect seems overly local to Manchester and a disambiguation page might be preferable. I would be bold and make the change but I thought it better to leave this message in hopes that anyone opposed to such a change could put their views before any decision is made one way or another. Alex McKee (talk) 19:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that there has been no response I decided to be bold and change this to a disambiguation page. Currently David Royle (actor) is a redlink, though. Alex McKee (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the redirect appropriate? Disambiguation preferred?
Talk:Upstairs at Eric's

message: I dont understand why the younger generations keeps quoting Allmusic, is it because its easy?. Who the eff care what blog writers at Allmusic think about an album that that was produced 30 years before they existed? People should stick to Allmusic reference only to music that was proceeded when the band/ group/person existed at the same time as Allmusic...which wasnt that long ago in Allmusic's case  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starbwoy (talk • contribs) 17:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: AllMusic isn't a blog – and the Wikipedia consensus is that it is a reliable source as a reference: see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums#All Music for example. Richard3120 (talk) 20:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Checked. Richard3120 (talk) 18:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Allmusic refereences and quotes
Talk:Melā

message: I think this just needs to be cleaned up. I was going to recommend Expert attention for the phonetic pronounciation. Andargor 22:07, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Less of a "cleanup", more of a "supply some encyclopaedic content".  I've put a minimal amount in and taken the delete tag off; care to help out? Tonywalton  | Talk 22:15, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

message: It looks to me like Mela and Mela Festival are both about the same topic. So I'm proposing they be merged into Mela. The other page has little extra except more external links. --Qetuth (talk) 03:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a good idea.  I'll go ahead and redirect that page to here since it seems like there are no objections.  I've already transferred the external links.  Zujua (talk) 05:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger - two articles on the same topic? 
Talk:Oxaprozin

message: I'm not sure this sentence is needed: "It is not a narcotic so it is not habit forming from a physically addictive nature."
Can't we just identify the drug as a non-narcotic and leave it at that?
:That's fine. Blame the drugheads. JFW | T@lk 07:26, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: Where is the reference that puts glucosamine and chondroitin into the NSAID class ("Other" category in the table)?  These substances may have pharmacological properties, but I think it is misleading to class them as NSAIDs.LM6407 (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: glucosamine and chondroitin
Talk:Titans Tower

message: How do they balance it?
:According to George Pérez: "There is a building in New York that is similar to the Titans Tower. It may not look it, but it is architecturally sound. It can stand." I haven't been able to find out what this building is, though. Daibhid C 12:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George Henry Andrews

message: Is this a TRUE story??? I cannot find anything about him on the internet! () I did find some other persons with the name George H. Andrews (), but they lived in different times and did different things... Maybe it's a true story, but the story here seems like the summary of a book. The article was first called (before I moved it) "Heroes of Liberia"... That does sound like the title of a book... Is there anybody who knows more about this??? --MarioR 22:33, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this article a true story or fictional???
Talk:Talisman: Sacred Cities, Secret Faith

message: This isn't an encyclopaedia article, it's a press release.  I unfortunately don't have the time or energy to invest in completely rewriting it, nor have I read the book, but I've added the cleanup-rewrite tag in the hope that someone better placed than I will be able to do so.  Binabik80 22:38, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Bauval

message: I'm fairly sure Bauval must have attended either the British Boy's School or (more probably) the British Boys' School, not the British Boys's School as the article currently states, but I don't know which one is correct.  Binabik80 22:40, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: corrected to " Boys' ".--cjllw | TALK 04:17, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: See this. Doug Weller talk 19:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recently paid a predatory publisher to publish an article with Robert Schoch 

message: "In late 1992, Bauval had been trying to obtain a translation of Hermetica by Walter Scott. He then came across a new edition printed by Solo Press with a foreword by Adrian Gilbert.[1] Bauval contacted Gilbert after being interested in his foreword concerning a link between an Alexandrine school of Hermes Trismegistus and the pyramid builders of the Fourth dynasty of Egypt." 
The reference given for the second sentence is a link to the book, this supports only that Adrian Gilbert wrote a forward for a book (not even really a reliable third party source for that). The rest of this charming story is completely unsourced as it is not encyclopedic to boot, it should go.
"which became an international bestseller"
The source calls the books written by Hancock and Bauval "best sellers" not "international best sellers" seems unsourced puffery.
A good deal of content tagged citation needed for three years remains uncited. A substantial trimming seems in order. MrBill3 (talk) 08:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced content 

message: Here. The conclusion:
"As I plowed through the book, it is this that I struggled with the most. It was not the convoluted reasoning that would probably have killed my undergrad Jesuit logic professor. It was not the calculated exclusion of well-accepted regional archaeological knowledge. It was not the subtle (and often not so subtle) implications that archaeologists are purposefully obscuring “the truth.” Instead it was how best to separate the illogical, unsubstantiated, and often downright crazy assertions from some of these more thorny (and valid) underlying disciplinary issues without ascribing any measure of genuine authority or expertise to the authors, because, let me tell you, they sure do not deserve any." 
And earlier in the review:
"the authors engineer the “simple truth” of their argument by totally neglecting to discuss current research in the Neolithic and Predynastic of the Nile Valley (and immediately surrounding area). They also completely neglect to discuss any of the research carried out by the Combined Prehistoric Expedition on other sites in the region, such as the Middle Paleolithic site of Bir Tarfawi, the Upper Paleolithic site of Wadi Kubbaniya, or the wealth of Neolithic sites in the Bir Kiseiba and Bir Abu Hussein regions, all of which would complicate the tottering house of cards they have constructed."
Doug Weller talk 11:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of Black Genesis in Antiquity Magazine.
Talk:Burgess Hill Town Football Club

message: I posted the history of the club but I run the official website so have rights to post it
:Do you agree to release the contents under the GFDL?  See Wikipedia:Copyrights.  If not, we can't accept the content.  RADICALBENDER★ 00:52, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
No reply to the above. No attempt made to convert to Wiki standards. Deleted today. -- RHaworth 22:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ficus elastica: an in-depth look at the rubber plant

message: This article should be merged with Ficus elastica.  It makes no sense to have both articles.  While this article has more information, it's poor quality, and the title does not fit naming conventions.  The other article is a stub, and has less information on it, but better fits naming conventions, and presents a far more professional appearance.  Schuminweb 22:44, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - MPF 21:51, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge this article out of existence!
Talk:Fletcher FU-24

message: To the user who has been editing in additions concerning the FD-25 Defender;
1. It would be more appropriate for extensive information about the Defender to be in an article about the Defender.  Please feel free to write one :-).
2. If you are not confident writing in English, it might be a good idea to have someone to proof read your alterations before you enter them.  If you post proposed changes to the Fletcher article on this page, I am happy to proof read them
3. Please don't delete links unless you are very sure they are broken. Winstonwolfe 03:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Fletcher FD-25 Defender]]
Talk:Mihai Antonescu

message: You should quote your sources, especially about controversial political matters
Are you sure that Mihai Antonescu sent Romanian Jews to Nazi deathcamps? I think Romanians would strongly deny this, so it is a controversial issue..
: Actually, it seems that the Germans demanded him to hand them the Romanian Jews in order to be sent to the camps in Poland. Apparently, under German pressure he initially agreed, but then changed his mind. bogdan | Talk 08:58, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article mentions 1907 as his year of birth, while on the Romanian Wikipedia the date of November 18, 1904, is stated. I've also found November 5, 1904 on this website:  - but it is likely to be the same date, Old Style. Does anyone have better sources? Mentatus 09:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know who wrote 1907, but 1904 is confirmed by the 1978 dictionary I have at home. Will change. Dahn 11:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Antonescu's birthdate

message: Should there be mention that Mihai Antonescu and Ion Antonescu were not related somewhere in the article? I had to search elsewhere to confirm they weren't. 101.98.118.156 (talk) 07:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention lack of relation