Talk:Macchi C.205 Veltro

message: Mr. Giovanni Paulli of www.paulligiovanni.com has been so gentle to authorise me to use some copyrighted images of profiles, like that I added in the article, PROVIDED THAT his copyright and his weblink are shown. Please don't remove them.
--Attilios 09:58, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of copyrighted color profile

message: Some of the figures in "Design and development" don't agree with those in the "Specifications" section, so a tidy in this area will wait until this has been addressed. -- Red Sunset 11:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications and performance figures 

message: "C.205s and around 100 Veltros" ? Shouldn't that be C.202s and around 100 Veltros ? Dirk P Broer 17:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I saw that too and was not sure what the original edit meant so I left it alone. FWIW Bzuk 20:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Having checked back to the original contribution, I've removed the misleading mention of the C.205s in addition to Veltros which was my error. Apologies to all. --Red Sunset 11:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: After the Atmistice 

message: The article states that the Macchi C.205 was "built around the powerful Daimler-Benz DB 605 engine." However, as the specifications section indicates, it was powered by the Fiat RA.1050 R.C.58 Tifone engine - a license-built version of the DB 605. I suggest the article say it was designed around the DB 605.Sca (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine

message: "In fact, the Veltro used the same wing as the earlier Folgore but its weight had increased from 2,350 kg (5,180 lb) to 3,408 kg (7,515 lb) and the wing loading from 142 kg/m² (29 lb/ft²) to 203 kg/m² (41 lb/ft²)."
this is write but 2.350 kg is empty weight for 202 and 3408 kg is total weight for 205 so the article compare apples with oranges  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.234.219.217 (talk) 18:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: illogical

message: I suspect that "poor Italian industrial capability" really means "low Italian industrial capacity", in which case it should be reworded. Srnec (talk) 02:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording 

message: Substituted at 22:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Macchi C.205. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/macchi/profilo_mc205v.jpg
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090527195200/http://www.museoscienza.org/dipartimenti/aerei_mc205.asp to http://www.museoscienza.org/dipartimenti/aerei_mc205.asp
*Added  tag to http://romagnaairfinders.freeforumzone.leonardo.it/discussione.aspx?idd=5219839
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100510180250/http://www.volandia.it/velivoli/c205v.htm to http://www.volandia.it/velivoli/c205v.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified