Talk:Buddhist prayer beads

message: In whose "ancient cosmology" were there "9 planets"?  Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn are the 5 actual planets visible without a telescope.  Then things like the sun, the moon, or Earth may or may not have been included, but that brings a maximum of 8 as far as I know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.147.254 (talk) 18:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Astrology is definitely not a part of Buddhist teachings, so this point is invalid.  I removed that part and expanded on the other points.  --Ph0kin (talk) 05:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: see buddhist cosmology's article. Buddhists knew about the big bang - big crunch cycle:
"various eons of cosmic expansion, various eons of cosmic contraction
 BHS Tripitaka
--Bodigami (talk) 23:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  9 planets? 

message: *Merge and redirect Japa mala to Buddhist prayer beads
Should be self-explanatory. - jc37 02:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything in Japa mala is already merged into this article, and even explained better. However the Japa mala article was restored, since somebody pointed out that Japa Malas are used both in Hinduism and Buddhism. Actually maybe Japa mala should give two links, one to Buddhist prayer beads and one to Hindu prayer beads. Since the use must be different in the two religions (I do not know much about the use in Hinduism), this could be an idea. Also, using the english naming would be better according to the WP:STYLE guidelines. Siru108 (talk) 08:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be two artilces. They discuss different things and respectively 8 and 11 interwiki's show that this difference is made in other languages too. Davin (talk) 13:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: i prefer lotusary (english) or lotusario (spanish and italian)... or buddhist's mala over "rosary".--Bodigami (talk) 23:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  use of rosary as a name 

message: in sanskrit it has a different meaning (mālā != mala)--Bodigami (talk) 23:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  it is mAlA not mala 

message: This article cites Religion Facts, but the Religion Facts page cites Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by NathanWalther (talk • contribs) 20:56, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular Citation 

message: The section detailing what type of bead should be used for what purpose has no basis in Buddhist teaching. It seems that this is simply new age ideas imposed on a Buddhist topic.
Even if a reliable source can be found for that, I don't think it should be taking up as much of the article as it is. What the bead is made from is of little to no relevance for most Buddhists. The beads are a practical, meditative tool.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonsai Ent (talk • contribs) 23:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New Age isn't Buddhism

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Buddhist prayer beads. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100817164550/http://www.religionfacts.com/buddhism/things/mala.htm to http://www.religionfacts.com/buddhism/things/mala.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Whole section Mala writes from a Tibetan Buddhist point of view but is not clearly identified as such. Does not discuss other existing schools. The use of a lot of jargon makes the section inherently non-understandable and thus of very little use. Waerloeg (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbalanced and unclear section