Talk:Timeline of atomic and subatomic physics

message: I'm wondering if we should link the name of person x every time it appears, rather than only for the first item on the timeline. It would make casual link-hopping a lot easier... Dstudent 05:53, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linkage policy 

message: Some of the people credited with particle physics discoveries are incorrect.  For example the upsilon meson was found by a group led by Leon Lederman, and S.W. Herb is simply the first name listed alphabetically on the discovery paper.  Probably particle physics experiments since WWII should be credited to experimental groups rather than to individuals.  I will work on this.  Also the detail drops way off as the timeline approaches the present day, so the timeline is a bit inconsistent; I may work on this also.  -- SCZenz 23:46, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crediting needs work 

message: I don't know, whether the expression microphysics exists in English, but in Hungarian Wikipedia we changed to Timeline of microphysics. A physicist said me, that it exists in Hungary in the meaning of the five field of physics. -- Harp 13:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although a google search on microphysics suggests that the term means something different in meteorology, I did find the above definition in an on-line dictionary.  Since the name of this timeline is so atrocious I'm going to be bold and change the name.  If someone who actually knows something about this field of science disagrees, they can change it back.  --JeffW 17:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline of microphysics

message: added a mergeto template to the newly-created article . Please discuss this proposed merge. --Christopher Thomas 00:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Timeline of Fundamental Physics Discoveries]]

message: There was a stale merge request for this merger.  I have no opinion on whether it should be done or not.  If there is no consensus to do the merge please feel free to delete the tags on both pages.  --Selket Talk 21:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I suggest we remove things like the currently last entry about the LHC having "a big chance" to discover the Higgs boson. I don't think a timeline should include chances and speculations, but only achievements. -- Northgrove 16:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chances at the LHC? 

message: Should I add this? What are your thoughts?
400-1000 CE An Abhidhamma commentary talks about material units very much smaller than atoms known as Kalapas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.15.97 (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kalapas 

message: I propose merging Timeline of particle physics (TPP) into Timeline of atomic and subatomic physics (TASP) [not to be confused with Timeline of particle discoveries ]. I think the content in TPP can easily be explained in the context of TASP, and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in TASP. Also TASP is used in navigation templates and is more complete than TPP.  ReyHahn (talk) 09:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Too much overlap. One such article would be a clear win. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Support Agreed, they mostly overlap already. Hi! (talk) 23:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal