Talk:Tony Scherman

message: The collections section is better in list format, moving back to that format. Per the ANI and clear warnings from administrators, I would caution Maybeparaphrased to step back and consider his/her actions. It makes little sense that the editor a) nominates the page for deletion then b) begins removing references, formatting and breaking good wikilinks addded in order to retain the page.  HappyValleyEditor (talk) 01:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:PROSE talks about prose being preferred in articles. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:34, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The list format is appropriate here. Exhibitions are similar in nature to publications or a discography, where Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists of works applies.Mduvekot (talk) 15:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Coolabahapple, I see what you are saying about prose and appreciate your input. On the other hand, What Mduvekot says about lists might be in line with the children list exception. Personally, I'm for a list here, as you can quickly see all of the involved museums. Prose-wise a list of ten museums ends up being a difficult to read, and it's a boring piece of prose. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 16:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks , i see what you mean:) Coolabahapple (talk) 18:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, so we have three in favour and one against. Any other comments before we go back to list format?HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

text: I think that when you do a long list like that with wiki links and references it does not look very encyclopedic. The long list force the reader to scroll down. That makes the article difficult to read. A paper printed encyclopedia would not have a long single column list. Zpeopleheart (talk) 19:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collections 

message: Do you want the Collections section on the article to be done as (A) prose?
Do you want the Collections section on the article to be done as a (B) list?
Zpeopleheart (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC

message: I want the collections section to be in prose per my reasonings above. Zpeopleheart (talk) 20:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: In favor of (A)

message: * Support per my explanation above. Mduvekot (talk) 19:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: In favor of (B)

message: *Motion to close per WP:SNOW. -- I dream of horses    @  22:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Tony Scherman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110526215339/http://www.rca-arc.ca/en/about_members/since1880.asp to http://www.rca-arc.ca/en/about_members/since1880.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060919230843/http://www.winstonwachter.com/artist_bio_seattle.php?folder=Scherman_Tony to http://www.winstonwachter.com/artist_bio_seattle.php?folder=Scherman_Tony
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060918144122/http://www.winstonwachter.com/artist_page_seattle.php?folder=Scherman_Tony to http://winstonwachter.com/artist_page_seattle.php?folder=Scherman_Tony
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified