Talk:Ford TH!NK

message: Do we need to write TH!NK everytime we mention the name of the vehicle. Isn't it enough to write Think in the repeated mentions that are found throughout the article. Regards, Signaturebrendel 06:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an interesting question. I think the best thing to do would be to follow the trend set by other articles. DRIV3R and Se7en suffer from a similar handicap. DRIV3R is never called Driver 3 in its article. Se7en is mentioned twice: once as Se7en and once as Seven. Of course, the movie poster listed that movie as "seven." It seems, therefore, like we should continue to use TH!NK. Miguel Cervantes 16:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I see your point. While I think it is a bit unecyclopedic to write TH!NK, it is probably the best thing to do. Thanks for the reply. Regards, Signaturebrendel 18:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:MOSTM clearly recommends Think. "TH!NK" borders on criminal. 24.30.82.227 (talk) 03:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TH!NK vs. Think 

message: When did this happen?  Maikel 19:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When did what happen? --Miguel Cervantes 19:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: QVOM?

message: 1. Official Ford TH!NK page redirects to Environmentally Friendly Vehicle Innovation - Ford with no mention of the TH!NK. No copy of archive.org
2. A review of the TH!NK Mobility redirects to a generic page with no TH!NK information. Archive.org has a copy A review of the TH!NK Mobility
3. TH!NK preview at Natural Life Magazine redirects to the site's home page. Archive.org copy Ford Launches Line of Electric Vehicles.
Is it proper to use archive.org links or just remove the dead ones? Thanks. 71.174.3.176 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: "Ford sold its stock, and the resulting company, Think Global, produced electric cars in Norway until declaring bankruptcy in 2011.[1][2][3]"
All of these references (1, 2, 3) are much older than 2011. So the bankruptcy in 2011 has no proper citation.
This one might do:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2011/06/electric-vehicle-maker-think-files-for-bankruptcy-in-norway.html
Noam bergman (talk) 11:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing / inaccurate citations 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Ford TH!NK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060420144917/http://www.ford.com:80/en/redirect/think/default.htm to http://www.ford.com/en/redirect/think/default.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ford TH!NK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060625223908/http://www.cpsc.gov:80/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml01/01525.html to http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml01/01525.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/th-nk-again-ford-does-a-u-tur
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A press launch of the Ford TH!NK took place in London on 11th September 2001 when 13 vehicles were displayed to the press and the public in Trafalgar Square.  The event was attended by the Mayor of London and Ford's CEO; I was one of the representatives from Transport for London (TfL).  TfL took delivery of one of the vehicles, for use by an inter-office courier, and I had the opportunity to ride in it.  Unfortunately, what was intended as the start of a new age of city transport was eclipsed by events in New York later that day. 31.5.230.234 (talk) 12:19, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Launch