Talk:Russell Humphreys

message: Criticisms are given for his "Earth cooling model", but no description of it is given.  Does that seem backwards to anyone else? ~ MD Otley (talk) 01:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cooling model 

message: Article could use some editing for better organisation, e.g., cosmological model, cooling, geology sections. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 20:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Organisation

message: While it seems a vast improvement and that people are not just bashing him and his theories anymore, my understanding of wikipedia's policies is that anything on a discussion page, except for personal attacks or obscene material stays.  This discussion page is completely different than the last time I checked it, say six months ago or so.  Did it change when this became part of the biography project?68.207.147.98 (talk) 03:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why has discussion page completely changed? 

message: Link Number 8 is down  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.207.240.4 (talk) 17:31, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've replaced the URL. Sean.hoyland - talk 15:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Number 8 is Down 

message: May be more reliable to put some source of the Sandia laboratories instead http://creation.com/d-russell-humphreys-cv, because papers and awards cited are not to be found in IEEE Xplore.
The "source" is verifiable indeed, but its claims are still not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.210.12.6 (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References cited 

message: This flag was placed 7 days ago, and yet nothing has been placed in the talk page citing what is disputed. Please follow the protocol or remove the tags. Thank you.YK102 (talk) 20:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any point of view issue. The sources cited are peer reviewed scientific journals, and an article by a 3rd party. Will remove the tags, as no one seems to have any issue or they would have put the details of their dispute here. 216.108.187.67 (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Dispute - Planetary Magnetic Field Predictions 

message: Why is this guy notable? He seems to have done nothing much. --Pete (talk) 05:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I won't comment on the so-called theories espoused by this individual, but I will note that the entire text of this entry is plagued with spelling and grammatical errors, and someone who cares should really clean it up.
A Greenskeeper (talk) 15:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Russell Humphreys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820010119/http://www.creationresearch.org/board.html to http://www.creationresearch.org/board.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Can we stop using the word "alleged"? Alleged sounds biased against Humphreys concerning the Starlight problem. Let's use the words "supposed to". It sounds more neutral.
99.181.16.30 (talk) 01:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged

message: Reference 3 appears to be a spurious link to a divorce lawyer’s web page 2A00:23C7:1F30:E401:D8AE:BF3C:9DE8:58FC (talk) 22:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 3