Talk:Xanthone

message: I would have to agree that that is suspicious and most likely put up by someone selling the mangosteen juice; however, that statement does have some truth to it.  Take a look on PubMed.gov, and you'll find a significant amount of information regarding xanthones.  Most of the research articles do involve xanthones extracted from the Garcinia mangostana (mangosteen fruit).  ARA 03:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  xanthones 

message: The external link is an advertisement for products from specific companies and should be deleted.
:That seems to be the consensus - the link has been removed at least six times. Edgar181 22:08, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: Hello,
I was trying to look up "Xanthones" and found contradicting information:
At this moment (April 25, 2006) Xanthones are explained in Wikipedia like this (abbreviation of article): "In 1939, xanthone was introduced as an insecticide. Xanthone currently finds uses as ovicide for codling moth eggs and as a larvicide."
But when I search in Google "define Xanthone", then Google refers to the very same page in Wikipedia with this excerpt: "Xanthones, highly active plant phenols found in a limited number of plants, are among the most powerful antioxidants known to science. Scientific research has found over 40 out of 210 known xanthones in the pericarp of the mangosteen fruit. What's remarkable is that it's not just the inner flesh of the mangosteen, but the whole fruit, that represents the single greatest known supply of these tremendously beneficial xanthones found anywhere in nature."
Google probably has this information from their cache, so the change must have happened recently. Clicking the link provided by Google refers to the above page with the insecticide informatin.
Of course, both informations could be correct. But the latter is definitely suspicious of being added by the makers of mangosteen juice who advertise their product with its richness of Xanthones.
Could someone knowledgeable please verify?
Thank you.
MalEbenSo 17:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juice companies trying to manipulate? 

message: During the late 1970s and early 1980s, Imperial Chemical Industries plc was conducting extensive research on the UV absorbtion properties of Xanthone. Tetra-hydroxy Xanthone was polymerised into polyester and typically increased the lifespan of the polyester film from 3 years to 10 years. The synthesis process was refined to greatly reduce the overall cost of the additive and given that the third generation of solar cells are now being printed directly onto plastic film, the additive could significantly increase the typical life-span of such cells.
{Nigelpwsmith (talk) 12:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  UV Absorber 

message: I have removed "There is a rising interest in a number of these xanthones as numerous of them are among the strongest anti-radicals and anti-oxigenes, anti-aging and related diseases, anti-cancerogenes" from the article.  It not only uses unscientific words, but it is also uncited, and probably an exaggeration.  If true it can be added back in with appropriate citation. Deli nk 19:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from article 

message: You guys, I read that Xanthone is the active ingredient in St. John's Wort, which is a herbal remedy for treating depression. Maybe someone can verify this and add it to the article? Just a thought.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.138.86.250 (talk) 11:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The major active antidepressive constituents in St John's wort are thought to be hyperforin and hypericin, not xanthone.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: St John's Wort

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 20:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Xanthone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927010409/http://www.alfa.com/MSDSPDF/English/A14812.pdf to http://www.alfa.com/MSDSPDF/English/A14812.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've removed the following statement because it doesn't make sense as written.  Maybe someone can add context and/or meaning.  Marbletan (talk) 18:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear statment