lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Philadelphia Daily News

message: The official title of this newspaper is "Philadelphia Daily News" - with no article.  Please check for the official title before moving web pages.  RADICALBENDER★ 20:52, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
I need to advertise in your newspaper. how do i do that ? No link, no button to click, NOTHING ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacquesamar2008 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The Philadelphia Daily News is a tabloid newspaper that serves Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States. The newspaper is owned by Philadelphia Media Network (Interstate General Media since April 2012) which also owns Philadelphia's other major newspaper The Philadelphia Inquirer(& Philly.com).
Also, now THE PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS 6 DAY HOME DELIVERY PLUS FREE ALL DIGITAL ACCESS is $6.60 per week. THE PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS ALL DIGITAL ACCESS is $6.07 per week. These subscriptions give you access to PhillyDailyNews.com and The Daily News Digital Replica Edition - 6 Days a Week - so you can read us on your computer, tablet or smartphone. These also gives you access to the Philadelphia Daily News app powered by Rumble.
--Dklatz (talk) 18:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Information
Talk:Chilapalapa

message: Chilapalapa was born in Southern Africa during the nineteenth century out of necessity for a common language among the tribally diverse multitude of economic migrants flocking to the gold and diamond mines seeking employment. Although Chilapalapa is considered, particularly by the affluent black community of today as a second class and even derogatory language due to its colonial association it is however a delightful and dynamic hybrid language composed from Southern Africa’s many indigenous languages' such as Shona and Ndebele and interposed with the white African languages of Afrikaans and English. The unique beauty of this language is two fold. Those who speak Chilapalapa have an understanding and respect for their home land, nature and their fellow man. It is also rather difficult to instantly express displeasure in an aggressive manner.(20:57, 13 August 2005 62.253.64.1562.253.64.15 (talk)
:I guess that sums up two very different point of views. But it begs the question why a new langauge was "invented" on the mines rather than teaching Afrikaans or English.Babakathy (talk) 17:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Gaspar de Guzmán y Pimentel, Count-Duke of Olivares

message: I've had a go at expanding this a bid and getting the in-line citations sorted. There were one or two facts in the original that I just couldn't track citations down for (but look like they're no doubt correct!) and I have highlighted these with 'citations needed' flags. The comments on the pictures have been drawn from their original wikipedia entries. The overall tone of the article is perhaps slightly more positive towards Olivares than the original, but this seemed to be reflecting the weight of the modern sources I could find. The ambiguity over the Catalan v. mainstream histories of the revolt of 1640 could usefully be checked over by someone with a Catalan academic background (the English sources I'm using may have a slant all of their own here!). Hchc2009 (talk) 18:50, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Though at brittanica.com his birthdate is January 16 (and "Pimentel" is misspelled "Pimental"), Elliot in an extensive history of Olivares's family in The Statesman in an Age of Decline -- the only biography of Olivares in English, I believe -- gives the date as January 6. Looking for  biographical information in Spanish at Google Books, Siglos Dorados 2 at p. 1411, citing the Statesman book and a biography in Spanish, gives his birthdate as 6 de enero de 1587, as do the few other Spanish sources available there; I didnt find a source for January 16. Accordingly I changed the January 16 dates back to January 6. If that date is wrong please revert but please provide your source(s). Thanks -- LaNaranja (talk) 13:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olivares's birthdate
Talk:Science fiction magazine

message: I am working in a sandbox on a planned article on Science fiction and fantasy pulp magazines, which will cover the magazines listed in :Template:ScienceFictionFantasyWeirdPulpMagazines, perhaps omitting a couple of the purely weird fiction titles such as Tales of Magic and Mystery.  When that's done I propose to rewrite part of this article as a summary of the new article, per summary style.  If anyone is interesting in helping with the article please feel free to join me at the sandbox; or just keep an eye on it and comment as you see fit. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 16:16, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned expansion of section on pulp magazines 

message: Could we include Artemis and maybe write an article on it? SF-Encyclopedia entry here:  Haukur (talk) 22:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article is written, we can certainly include it. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artemis magazine 

message: I wonder if a section on how the subject affected popular culture or its footprint in other media. In particular, I'm thinking of the Deep Space Nine episode "Far Beyond the Stars". It actually goes into detail on the functioning of a 1940s or 1950s era SFM and the way it functioned in the midst of bigotry and institutionalized racism and sexism. Other possibilities are George McFly's consumption of SFMs in the movie Back to the Future and its pivotal role in the plot when Marty dresses up like Darth Vader from the planet Vulcan. I would be bold, but I don't have nearly the amount of expertise in the subject matter to write confidently on the topic, at least not this month. --Srwalden (talk) 06:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural Impact or Portrayal
Talk:Kefaya

message: The Pragmatic Fantasy, C Glick 172.130.2.69 (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: new article
Talk:Fault current

message: Please place all comments/ questions here Thank you
Information and examples of fault current calculations would be great.
Hey, we've only just started this page . Give it a chance for some contributions!!Light current 21:33, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to seem pushy, but it's been 6 weeks since this page was created, and there hasn't been any added info at all.  Can a topic such as this one really be expanded into an encyclopedic length article??  As it stands it is a clear cut canidate for Wiktionary, simply because it is nothing more than a dicdef.  -- Malo 04:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions/comments about Fault Current page
Talk:Samson and Delilah (1949 film)

message: I strongly doubt whether Jabotinsky wrote any "treatments"; it seems much more likely that he was completely uninvolved in Hollywood, other than the film rights to his novel being purchased... AnonMoos (talk) 20:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Why hasn't this problem been fixed after six years?? AnonMoos (talk) 01:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "original film treatments by Harold Lamb and Vladimir Jabotinsky"

message: Not sure what was wrong with it (see )... -- AnonMoos (talk) 20:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Groucho quote
Talk:Alia Toukan

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 00:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Queen Alia of Jordan →  – The conventions at WP:NCROY indicate the a recently deceased consort should have this name. However, this consort has been deceased for a while now and I think the original surname is the best title unless there is a another WP:COMMONNAME regarding what the title should be. Interstellarity (talk) 16:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

text: * Sorry about that. I did not realize that was her original surname. I will change the proposal to that. Pinging  If they are willing to weigh in on this proposal. Interstellarity (talk) 12:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 April 2021
Talk:Babcock University

message: In addition to serious NPOV problems, this page is a copy of [].  I wouldn't be surprised if the copyright owner has published the material, but unfortuanetly the page was published anonymously. -Fermion 23:15, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Issue 

message: Fermion, I can see that your comment is from before some major changes.  I was writing a comment disagreeing with your statements before I noticed that.  Would you say now (especially since you also have been working on this page a bit) that it is now relatively NPOV and also avoids copyvio?  I agree that if it was an exact copy of that "about" page on TAGnet, that it was quite a ways from NPOV, but has your opinion changed now that the page has?  If not, what can be done to make it better?  --Cromwellt|Talk 03:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not NPOV? 
Talk:Yankees–Red Sox rivalry

message: The events around this are very notable to that of the rivalry. When a manager who says he hates the other team in the rivalry gets fired, it is worth mentioning. Furthermore, the Yankees defeated the Red Sox to clinch the division and home field advantage in the playoffs. That too is notable within the context of the rivalry. This isn't a "game by game" recap as you said. Winning the division and securing home field advantage is a notable moment. Arnabdas (talk) 20:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So notable that the Yankees are down 0-3 and losing Game 4 as we speak. The fact that the Yankees clinched home field against the Red Sox is coincidence. That the Red Sox fired their manager is completely immaterial to the Yankees and their rivalry, regardless of what he said to try to stir things up and inject himself into things. His comments may be worth including here, but not his firing. The "game by game" recap I was talking about was the game by game recap of the April series I deleted. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Coincidences are exactly why the rivalry takes place. All rivalries result because of games they coincidentally play against one another. I know you don't like the rivalry articles based on your past opinion, but given that they exist, the Yankees winning the division and clinching home field advantage after playing them is a relevant piece in a long history between the two teams. Arnabdas (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of 2012 Season 

message: CBS Sports showed a breakdown of Connecticut's lines between where fan loyalties tend to lie. I think expanding a section regarding fan demographics, celebrity fans, or something like that could be worthwhile. 
http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-baseball/24424988/geopolitics-the-actual-border-between-red-sox-yankees-nations
161.185.157.22 (talk) 22:33, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. That map is pretty good too. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Section to Incorporate This Story...Possible Geographic Breakdown or Fan Profile? 

message: I was wondering if there were notable things that fans have done to show the intensity of the rivalry. One such example I found:
http://www.nj.com/yankees/index.ssf/2014/05/buck_foston_bar_wins_court_verdict_yankees_red_sox_fans_react.html
161.185.157.23 (talk) 18:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan Reactions Section? 

message: Why not include score of the 2021 wild card game? - 212.164.64.208 (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s standard practice to not include this because it is a single game and not a series of games.  Including the score is very likely to confuse readers due to it being runs in an individual game rather than games in a series. Carson Wentz (talk) 19:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  However, the Cardinals–Dodgers rivalry page uses score 1-0. 212.164.64.208 (talk) 08:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 Wild Card
Talk:Patent troll

message: "# Vagueness. The term "patent troll" is criticized as vague and its use as subjective.[12]"
12 is a link to a tiny, short article where he is asking the question for debate over if a Patent Troll is bad. It being confusing is mentioned once in the tiny article "Here’s my working definition of the confusing term: Patent Troll." Now, I don't understand where this link gets "vague" or "subjective" from. Aside from the article asking for more clarification on what a Patent Troll is. But that is the point of the article. You can't strike up debate over what a Patent Troll is for your site if you begin with "Patent Troll is clearly defined." 
I don't think this criticism should be on the page. It's ridiculous. The source is not credible. It'd be like me going to the The Dark Knight page and listing a criticism of the movie as "Some people do not think it is a movie" and then linking to a similar page with the topic "Is this a movie?" It's not an article, it's not an editorial, it's essentially a message board. It shouldn't be on Wikipedia. If anyone else can find someone confused over the term of a Patent Troll, then that should be allowed to stay. But until then, I say we delete it. Plus, it's a very large article up to that point, how can a criticism be that it is confusing? Anyone who read through this would know it's not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.214.207 (talk) 19:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Vagueness Criticism is Ridiculous.

message: Isn't the actual term "hoarding" and is it not the term found in the literature. "Troll" is something relatively new no doubt, and from internet culture. -Inowen (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoarding 

message: Apple claiming to be a victim of patent trolls? Really? If that isn't the pot calling the kettle...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.205.44.26 (talk) 04:25, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You added a context-free sentence without a source. It was rightly removed. This is not a place to randomly list companies that have filed patent suits. - MrOllie (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apple
Talk:Merry Christmas (Mariah Carey album)

message: Do you think a new section outlining the recent 25th anniversary deluxe edition of the album is warranted? I believe there is justified informative substantive on the new collaborations within the album and the sales of the rerelease. ƒin (talk) 05:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe a new section is warranted, with the addition of an image of the anniversary edition's cover artwork. Sliv812 (talk) 22:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anniversary edition addition 

message: Hey there, the article currently says, this Album is the best selling Christmas album of all time, whereas this article about Elvis' Christmas Album claims the same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvis%27_Christmas_Album
Original source about the 15 million copies sold is paywalled, but Elvis' article claims at least 20 million sold. Maybe this should be adjusted or corrected?
K0nnwik (talk) 08:46, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best selling
Talk:Cuauhtémoc

message: Tlatelolco was not a section of Tenochtitlán. Tlatelolco was one of the city-states allied with Tenochtitlán, along with Texcoco. When Tenochtitlán fell, the defenders who survived fled to Tlatelolco. This article needs to be fixed, in the part that describes Cuahtémoc's capture. glasperlenspiel 22:10, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
Tlatelolco originally was an independent city, but later it was dominated and abosorbed by the meshicas.   In the later days it had became a suburb of Tenochtitlan and the main market of Tenochtitlan was in Tlatelolco. Even so, Tlatlelolcas  were proud and remain loyal to the Mexhicas, even after all reamining nahuas had surernder or allied with the spaniards. thansk for tour comments, I will try to cleaning the article a bit.Nanahuatzin 01:41, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, it,s better. I will try to get some time to rewite this article, theres a lot of room for improve it :)  Nanahuatzin 07:08, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sources conflict as to whether he was tlatoani until his death in 1525, or whether his reign ended earlier in 1521 or 1522. Could someone add a section explaining what's going on here in the article? --Ptcamn 21:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of reign 

message: I think that legacy section shall be expanded with information about "Cuauhtemoc" - the ship, there is one :D and I've seen her in Szczecin during Tall Ship Races final. Please, let somebody place information - maybe even additional wiki site for it.
83.21.172.133 07:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy section... 

message: How does the man ascend the throne at 25 when it says he died at 22-23? One of the numbers in the article is off.
Lenneth (talk) 11:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age Inconsistency 

message: Has anyone else noticed that the statue of Cuahatemoc in downtown Mexico City clearly says Cuitlahuac on it, who was his predecessor?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.68.26.47 (talk) 06:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statue of Cuauhutemoc
Template talk:Patentability

message: IMHO the link towards inventor (U.S. patent law) seems a bit at odds with the others. It would probably be better to create a separate template with links to inventor (U.S. patent law), reduction to practice, conception (U.S. patent law) for instance. I dunno how we could call this template. What do you think of the suggestion? --Edcolins 19:56, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
* My instinct is that we should refrain from breaking down every concept into unique articles for each jurisdiction. It just seems like an awful lot of duplication, and many unnecessarily create lots of little articles instead of more comprehensive ones.  There would be more value in topical articles which also offered the treatment by other jurisdiction on the same page--a purely comparative analysis. I dunno. Mmmbeer 02:54, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventorship 

message: Inventorship can be relevant to patentability in Europe, although in only a limited way.  Where a disclosure is made within 6 months preceding the filing date of a European patent application, the disclosure is not taken into consideration if it was due to, or in consequence of, an evident abuse in relation to the applicant or his legal predecessor.  Thus the identity of the inventor (who is often the applicant, or his legal predecessor) can be of vital importance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.9.63.250 (talk • contribs) 
:Indeed. Thank you for this quite interesting comment, and improvement. I have integrated your comment in Inventor (patent). --Edcolins 21:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventorship relevance to patentability in Europe
Template talk:PatentLaw

message: Why putting "prior art" under non-obviousness? "Prior art" is equally relevant for novelty and inventive step. Why putting "person skilled in the art" under non-obviousness? "Person skilled in the art" is also relevant for inventive step. --Edcolins 22:24, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
* It's true, and no good reason. I was actually thinking that perhaps a better categorization might be Patentability objections.  The patent templates that existed currently were very deficient.  So I'm really just trying to work it out. Mmmbeer 03:57, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of India Test cricketers

message: I've added the statistics now, but I'd like someone more familiar with the names to go over them and check that they're right. Thanks! Sam Vimes 22:24, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

message: This is a list article. I have added the ratings as List. I am planning to send this to Peer Review and FLC shortly. Kalyan 07:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality Rating

message: I have updated the entire list. The table is updated as of India Vs Australia series, 2011-2012. The template at the top can be removed now I guess.--BPositive (talk)  06:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah it's updated template can be removed.--Vyom25 (talk) 08:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table updated
Talk:The Tulse Luper Suitcases

message: I made a stab at this. It still badly needs attention. Someone else may judge when to un-stub it. Information on TV/DVD/CDROM content would be particularly useful. Decklin 22:29, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yes, the films were shown out of order:
* "Pt. 1: The Moab Story": 24 May 2003
* "Pt. 2: Vaux to the Sea": February 2004
* "Pt. 3: From Sark to the Finish": 6 September 2003
I don't believe this was intended by Greenaway but rather an "artifact" of showing them at film festivals, not being shown when intended, etc.  There were also DVD copies made in Spain (Region 2, PAL format) in 2003 of all three, which were given to the Flash designers competing to create "suitcases" (games/puzzles) for The Tulse Luper Journey as background/source material.  Most of the suitcases include material from the DVDs as well as the two books mentioned on the page, and the film pieces one "earns" by "opening" a suitcase (solving the puzzle/winning the game) are taken from these films.
The three films above were finally compiled after someone "won" the online content into a film also released on DVD (Reg. 2/PAL) called "The Tulse Luper Suitcases".
A final film, called A Life in Suitcases (The Tulse Luper Journey) has been released on DVD and is for sale; sadly, it's also a Reg.2/PAL DVD from Spain. WinkJunior (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Films & DVDs

message: I.e., where is it? It's like an invisible event, recorded in histories but never seen, and not commented on by critics, who generally seem to critique the opening of a gas bill, but are in this case mysteriously lacking.
Nuttyskin (talk) 02:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical response?
Talk:Linndale, Ohio

message: If they have no jurisdiction on interstate 71, why do they still write speeding tickets on the freeway? -- Aaron  22:35, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Unclassified game

message: Perhaps this should be merged with the page Game unless someone can turn it into a genuine article. Sabine's Sunbird 22:43, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not. What you describe is original research, and this article in its present state would not survive an AfD (or so I hope). — mark ✎ 09:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Radio K.A.O.S.

message: MrMarmite reverted my changing of "working miner" to scab. He was correct to remove it in retrospect, but working miner still doesn't adequately describe the incident. Neutral term "strikebreaker," which is the title of the Wikipedia page for the concept, used instead. Diff pages here
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radio_K.A.O.S.&type=revision&diff=1049925418&oldid=1049841252
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radio_K.A.O.S.&type=revision&diff=1052905533&oldid=1052587633
 MechaBonaldMkV (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Working miner vs strikebreaker vs scab