Talk:George X of Kartli

message: Auf diesem Bild ist nicht George X von Kartli, sondern George III von Imereti dargestellt. Quelle: დონ ქრისტოფორო დე კასტელის ალბომი, წინასიტყვაობითა და შენიშვნებით გამოსცა ბ. გიორგაძემ,  თბილისი, 1977 წ. Entschuldigung für Deutsch. Deu. 19:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Die Datei wurde entfernt 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George X of Kartli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927105209/http://www.istoria.ge/personografia/G/giorgi%20X.htm to http://www.istoria.ge/personografia/G/giorgi%20X.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved George X to George X (talk show host), and retarget leftover redirect to George X of Kartli. Consensus is strongly in favor of vacating the talk show host from the George X title. However, the more contentious point was whether to move the monarch to the new title, or disambiguate. Consensus has determined that the monarch is the primary topic. However, it was also argued that the less-detailed name would not be helpful, and that showing the country is of interest to readers. Similar to how George XI is a redirect to George XI of Kartli and George XII is a redirect to George XII of Georgia, the leftover George X will be a redirect to the same title with "Kartli", and will include a hatnote to the talk show host, in line with WP:ONEOTHER. (closed by non-admin page mover) Utopes (talk / cont) 08:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Greetings Paintspot Infez! Thank you for voting. How's a king not a primary topic v. a television host? An emperor ✖ 20:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, they're both super-brief pages that usually get a single-digit number of pageviews a day. (Also, all the other Kartli kings named George have their pages at "George __ of Kartli" instead of just "George __". With the vast number of Georges who've been kings of regions of Georgia's triarchy, and given how their numbering gets a bit wonky at times, I think it's helpful to keep the "of Kartli" in the name.) I guess I'd probably say I'm somewhat NEUTRAL on the first move (instead of outright fully  opposing it), but I definitely support the second move. Paintspot Infez (talk) 22:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Paintspot Infez! You are correct that 'of "country"' titled articles for monarchs are the majority but when there is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per WP:COMMONNAME, WP:CONSISTENT, WP:CONCISE and WP:SOVEREIGN, the shorter version is utilized on Wikipedia. For example, Henry IV of England and Henry IV of France with "Henry IV" being a disamb page, while George III, George IV, Ismail I, Ardashir I etc. are shortened as they are WP:PTOPIC/CONSICE. Regards, An emperor ✖ 23:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: We have, however, retained "of country" for monarchs like Edwards/Richards, Christians/Fredericks, and others, again because the title that best meets the WP:CONCISE criterion is not necessarily the title that best balances all the criteria, as both policy and practice make clear. Per policy, titles should be recognizable to someone who's familiar with but no expert in the area. Also per policy, we prioritize the interests of general readers over those of specialists or editors when selecting a title. Removing the clarifier fails on both counts, and I see don't see any arguments that the proposed change aids our readers. More broadly, the most WP:CONSISTENT approach for sovereign articles like these would be simply to retain the clarifier, since this alternative seems to be leading to a less internally consistent mix of forms. ╠╣uw [talk] 12:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Greetings Necrothesp! Isn't a king the primary topic vs. a talk show host? Regards, An emperor ✖ 04:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably, yes, although he is a fairly obscure king. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 February 2024