Talk:Stavesacre

message: Should Stavesacre really be listed as "Christian Rock"? That is a label that they have fought to shed. I would list them as simply a rock band and perhaps somewhere in the article discuss the faith of the band, but make it clear that they are not a "CCM" brand.
--Wugmanmax (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Music classification

message: I have redesigned the article layout, adding section headers for History, Discography & videography and Band members (including Former members).  I also added a band bio box and a table for the discography.  Andy 18:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice job for a band that deserves it.   PhilipR 02:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article redesign

message: Should it be mentioned somewhere that the name was chosen by picking a random word in the dictionary. I think it was either Bellew or Solomon that did it. 68.63.248.123 20:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choosing the name? 

message: *The image is replaceable fair use, which isn't allowed (see WP:NFCC#4a). I found nothing on Flickr
*The lead really should be expanded to 2+ paragraphs
*"however, are currently" - probably best to just start a new sentence here
*"played in The Blamed" - make note here that it's a band
*"Salomon enjoyed the owners." - enjoyed working with the owners?
*Add a wlink for Stephen Thomas Erlewine
*"the band toured for nearly two years and grew immensely tired of the touring" - overuse of "touring"...use a different word
*Infobox says they're still active, yet you say they've broken up? (Also needs mention in the lead.)
:*After that anouncement, they said they were unsure if they would actually disband. Burningclean [speak] 02:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yeah, I saw that and forgot that I had said something about it here :S dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 07:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Passed. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 07:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GAN on hold

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Stavesacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610153406/http://www.hmmagazine.com/exclusive/stavesacres_debut200306/index.php?page=1 to http://www.hmmagazine.com/exclusive/stavesacres_debut200306/index.php?page=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070806211651/http://www.christianmusic.com/stavesacre/bio.html to http://www.christianmusic.com/stavesacre/bio.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610153433/http://www.hmmagazine.com/exclusive/stavesacre_interview200608/index.php?page=2 to http://www.hmmagazine.com/exclusive/stavesacre_interview200608/index.php?page=2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080505165157/http://www.indievisionmusic.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/new-stavesacre-music/ to http://www.indievisionmusic.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/new-stavesacre-music/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Are Stavesacre truly a supergroup as described in the lede?  I know most of the members had associations with other bands but it seems like Stavesacre doesn't fit the typical understanding of a supergroup. Retswerb (talk) 06:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would argue that if a source can't be found to support the term, it would be appropriate to remove. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Retswerb (talk) 05:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supergroup?