lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Dungeons & Dragons character class

message: I propose that the Base Class section be limited to only classes from the PHB, and the prestige classes limited to DMG classes. There are a number of other base classes with pages, but to put them all on the template would make it very unweildly. Warmage and warlock in particular should be removed, as well as the psionic classes (psion, psychic warrior, wilder). Soulknife is in the prestige class section, even though it is a base class in 3.5. If it is not removed, it should be moved to the base class section. -AndyBQ 12:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The community appears to have gone the other way and is currently including all of the available base classes in the template. I've added the three newest ones from Tome of Battle. Soulknife appears to have long since been corrected as well. The template is now fully v3.5 accurate. --Laxrulz777 17:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Limiting to PHB Classes

message: There is a naming convention discussion here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Role-playing games#Naming conventions -- JHunterJ 17:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming discussion 

message: 1. get rid of the red links. 
The template can't possible contain all D&D classes, just look at the huge long list here. 
So the template claerly doesn't have every D&D class in existence, and many of the red links are not linked to from anywhere either (For example, once i removed spellcaster from this template, there was nothing in the "what links here" for spellcaster). 
2. turn the verticle template into a horizontal one to put at the botton of pages. The length (vertically) of this template is rediculas. There is not one article on the template that is longer than the actual template (and that includes the core classes). Articles like Wilder (Dungeons & Dragons) end up with a template many many times longer than the actual article. 
If there's no objections to the first, i'm going to go and purge the red links. 
With the second, someone who knows how to write templates will have to do it. --`/aksha 02:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing the template

message: Samurai and Ninja were once prestige classes too, but you don't see them on the PrC list.  Soul knife has the right to be on the Alternate Base Class list as much as they do. Starman IX 19:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: uhh...because they're on the List of Prestige Classes? I guess if they're both, then alternate base classes is probably better. --`/aksha 11:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Soulknife on the prestige class list? 

message: Dragon magazine is supported by WotC, but it's really third party, as it is made by Paizo.  Are we gonna have to list all of the third party junk too? Starman IX 13:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Paizo's Dragon material is sanctioned as "official" by WotC.  So perhaps we can just identify the lists as lists of official junk. -- JHunterJ 13:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the Sha'ir
Template talk:Equation

message: Please use this template with care. It can create tables with narrow columns which wrap to multiple lines, creating a horrible mess. --Heron 09:45, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

message: It would be nice to implement the indexing functionality of the Ecuacion template of the spanish wikipedia
Please see: 
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plantilla:Ecuaci%C3%B3n
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plantilla:Eqnref
Both templates are really useful in that wikipedia
Diego Torquemada (talk) 14:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SPANISH WIKIPEDIA
Talk:Ravine

message: Ravine is not the same as canyon. There are two types of gorges. The small ones are gorge. The large ones:Canyon. When I read in the Lake District of ravines on some of these hills, it is only a V-shaped form made bij a brook.86.81.117.215 09:47, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; the redirect to canyon is inappropriate because the canyon article does not explain what a ravine is and how it differs from a gully, valley, gorge, ditch, etc. See also the Merriam-Webster definition. I have edited the Ravine article accordingly.--Mathew5000 10:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canyon
Talk:Tietze transformations

message: Here (https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3893972/259363) is a question I asked on MSE a while ago. There seems to be a small confusion in the article. The issue I addressed was about whether we are allowed to do an infinite amount of transformations, but the article's page never considers this case. It may be relevant and useful to include this !
AnthonyStC (talk) 17:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using an infinite number of Tietze transformations
Talk:The Tablet

message: Apparently, some sort of freeze has been put on editing this article due to recent vandalism.  I do have a reference for the readership statistics, but I can't edit the article at this point.  The Tablet's weekly readership is 23,500, and its estimated readership is 65,000. My source is this article: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/catholic-weekly-the-tablet-relaunches-470583.html
If somebody has the authority to sidestep the editing freeze and give the readership numbers a citation, that would be great! KelseighB (talk) 03:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readership citation 

message: This nickname is out of place in the lead. Bear in mind that however wrong-headed it may have become, the Tablet goes back to 1840 and has a long and to some extent honourable history. The wikipedia article is no place for registering your disgust with its current editorial stances. --Paularblaster (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bitter Pill 
Talk:Necessitarianism

message: This article is in need of some references, or it is subject to deletion per WP:NOR.  -- noosphere 10:07, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations please 

message: I think that they're a bit much, although I put them into the article myself. In the next day or two, I'll move them into Wiktionary and briefen the passages here by using links. The Tetrast (talk) 22:41, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the recently added definitions 

message: I was intrigued to see that the term "free choice" had a link. When I found that link merely pointed to the "free will" page, I felt it more appropriate to then use that term, if that is indeed what was intended. The ideas of free "will" vs. free "choice" are not the same. While many will debate whether or not contra-causal "free will" exists, from my understanding, the idea of a "compatabilist" idea of free "choice" is more widely accepted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CasqueHead (talk • contribs) 20:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to first line, with regards to the term " free choice" 

message: ... the term denotes the idea that God is bound by moral and ethical principles which, by implication, then either must be higher than God or in some sense identified with God. Both these latter ideas were viewed as anathema to the Christian notion of a personal god exercising divine will. I am of course well aware that this has hardly been a hot-button issue for the past 600 years, but still, this is meant to be an encyclopedia.137.205.101.81 (talk) 11:02, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the context of Medieval philosophy...
Talk:Normandie-Niemen

message: In the article it states that "Stalin awarded the unit the name Niemen for its participation in the battle of the Niemen River".  This is confusing.  A Battle of the Niemen River took place in 1920 between Russia and Poland.  Another battle with the same name (the one we want here) was in 1944 (I've amended with the date to help clarify.), but there is no Wikipedia article on that battle.   Perhaps someone with knowledge of military history could write one.
Incidentally, my interest in this squadron was brought about last week in Agde, when I witnessed a very moving ceremony to honour local pilot Charles Miquel who fought and died with the unit.  A memorial to him and the unit was unveiled in the presence of officers from the French and Russian air forces.  Details if anyone's interested at . Emeraude 17:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Normandie-Niemen name 

message: Can someone help those militarily "challenged" who aren't familiar with terminologies like regiment or squadron or group, etc. In short, can someone tell our readers how many Frenchmen actually flew in Russia during WWII in this branch of the French military. Dr. Dan (talk) 04:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Actual Numbers
Talk:A Little Light Music

message: "There are two versions of this album. The second version was printed in Italy and is marketed and distributed only in Italy and Greece. In this second version of this album, the Greek singer George Dalaras participates and sings a duet with Ian Anderson the song "John Barleycorn". This song was recorded live from the concert that took place on May 13, 1992."
I deleted this statement, which was on this page for a long time, because it's completely bogus and made up. A visit on discogs.com will prove that "John Barleycorn" is on every edition of the album. I have never ever seen or heard of a copy without that track Zappafripp (talk) 09:07, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only one edition
Talk:Czech lands

message: *Oppose Lands of the Bohemian Crown would be wider, including, at a minimum, all of Silesia; arguably all of Austria down to the head of the Adriatic. Another article on the subject would be welcome. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: You are invited to join Wikipedia:Czech Wikipedian's notice board! The Czech notice board can be used for discussions on Czech-related topics; to plan your Czech-related projects; and ask for, or offer assistance for Czech-related subjects. Editors are encouraged to sign their nickname on the list of active participators. --Thus Spake Anittas 02:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Czech Wikipedian's notice board]]

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Czech lands →  – As far as I can see this article is about the three historical regions of the Czech Republic: Bohemia, Moravia, and Czech Silesia. There is another article about the all lands of the Bohemian Crown:  the Kingdom of Bohemia, the Margraviate of Moravia, the Duchies of Silesia, and the two Lusatias (as well as other territories throughout its history). I propose a more unambiguous, precise title for this article. Caenus (talk) 19:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 November 2022
Talk:Svínoy

message: Please explain what a precipice is!86.81.117.215 10:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link to Knukur links to a mountain by that name on another island.ZFT (talk) 23:07, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Knukur
Talk:LEO (website)

message: There's a template for Wikipedians that also contribute to the forums at leo.org.
User:UBX/LEO contributor
Feel free to add it to your userboxes if you are a contributor. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 10:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributor template 

message: I have partly copyedited and updated the page. I have included a mention of some of the inadequacies of the lexical information submitted to the database by lay users. These are rare, but are neverthleless  more frequent than the error rate of professional and/or commercial dictionaries. It would be impossible to  cite references to  all the examples, but as a lexicographer and heavy user and contributor of LEO, I can confirm that this is so. If  anyone comes across such  examples, please add one or two  references.Kudpung (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article updated
Talk:Young Middenface

message: Would it be okay (as in not breaching copyright) to add a picture of of the front cover of Judge Dredd Megazine where it has Young Middenface on the front, and/or a page of the comic?
: I'd suggest using either the first or the last Megazine cover here - you are on better ground with a magazine cover as they are cosnidered OK to use for promotional purposes by most firms. It also has the advantage that you can use a better quality image here (comic panels have to be low resolution) and colour is often a better option on aesthetic grounds ;) (Emperor 19:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I think we should merge the majority of Middenface McNulty into this article. I really seems pointless, especially with such short articles. Troubleshooter 09:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  is more for immediate questions on how to do things. For article merges, let the notice remain for a few days; often someone will respond supporting or opposing the merger with reasons why. If no one responds, wait a few days and if you still think it is a good idea you can do the merger yourself. If you want, see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages and you can list it at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers to get more input. —Centrx→talk • 21:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Some consultation on this would have been appreciated - things tend to be a tad slow round here an so this was rather abrupt and just plain wrong. If there should be a merge then this should be merged with Middenface McNulty as it features the character as a young man. What I'm going to undo the merge (which wasn't much of a merge all you did was redirect here) and put in a merge going in the other direction and then I'm going to leave it up for a couple of weeks possibly a month (see some of the other 2000 AD merges). (Emperor 18:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I just thought it was the obvious thing to do, and no one said not to. Also, I did merge it, not just redirect. There was only a small amount of content in M McN that wasn't in YM, and I copied it all and pasted it into YM. Troubleshooter 19:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge - The character and the spin off series featuring the character can easily share a page. Artw 02:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I've merged this article into Middenface McNulty. See what you think-- the main info is still there. Noclevername 08:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Done
Talk:Lol Coxhill

message: Did he? When? quercus robur 11:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Peel sessions category

message: It's being said that he died. No reliable source as yet. Wwwhatsup (talk) 10:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Carol Grimes facebook: "My old friend Lol Coxhill died last night in Hospital Queen Square London. Spare thoughts, prayers, and love for a unique man, a father and musician and for his loving partner Ulrika. C xxxx" Wwwhatsup (talk) 10:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Try Twitter for additional confirmation, no usable RS yet though. Philip Cross (talk) 10:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Now confirmed. Philip Cross (talk) 11:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 
Talk:Dan Le Batard

message: This edit inferred that he was born in 1969 for a statement that he is 37 years old. I've removed the date until we have a better source. ×Meegs 11:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fair to me. - Mcasey666 16:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth 

message: could we possibly start a separate article based on Dan's radio show? --Krkr12 02:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dan Le Batard Show 
Talk:Keith Fullerton Whitman

message: Keith Fullerton Whitman to be merged into Hrvåtski. He is widely recognised by his musician moniker, and not his real name.
203.214.2.144 11:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

message: :Done. 70.36.88.64 03:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi,
I don't agree with this article being named "Hrvåtski", since that is misspelled Croatian, and Keith doesn't even use the fancy a-circle (as far as I know -- and I have pretty much all of his stuff back into the 90's). Why not simply "Hrvatski"? or perhaps a move back to "Keith Fullerton Whitman" (I wasn't involved in the merge discussion, otherwise my vote would be for that). Poorly encoded web-pages that rely on Wikipedia, such as this, derange it to HrvÃ¥tski.
So, as a proposal to stop spreading misinformation, could this article be moved to either:
#Hrvatski
#Keith Fullerton Whitman
My vote certainly goes to his actual name, but please, add comments below. +mwtoews 07:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hrvatski not Hrvåtski 

message: at this point hrvatski is essentially one pseudonym of KFW; surely the article should be there, with hrvatski as a redirect? --Kaini 03:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  move to Keith Fullerton Whitman 
Talk:Izumi-Chūō Station (Miyagi)

message: What sort of information would you like to add to this site?  It's currently between work and home, so I can certainly supply all sorts of things.-William McDuff 02:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit more about the history of the station would be great, especially if it was rewritten to be something more than a list of dates. But don't forget to cite your sources. Slambo (Speak) 14:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is needed?
Talk:Briar Patch (Star Trek)

message: This is probably about to be merged into a list of Star Trek regions of space, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badlands (Star Trek) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delphic Expanse. Excuse the lack of discussion, but 
# this is already a list
# if those articles were not merged, the likely alternative was deletion.
- Fayenatic (talk) 19:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Acehnese people

message: Moved Achinese article to here, as 'Acehnese' is the official and correct spelling, and has been for decades.  Eagleswings 12:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: JOOI, what material in this article comes from the Encyclopaedia Britannica?  Groogle 10:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopaedia Britannica

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=_Rp5cCMHFxQC&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=_Rp5cCMHFxQC&pg=PA6#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 14:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopaedia of the South East Asian Ethnography  edited by Narendra S. Bisht, T. S. Bankoti  

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=R9UKAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 03:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Achehnese, Volume 1  By Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje, Richard James Wilkinson
Talk:Chin'toka

message: In the DS9 episode Tears of the Prophets in which the Federation and the Klingon and Romulan empires invade the Chin'toka system, when the OWP's come online and begin firing at the vessels, there were no shield impacts, the weapons detonated directly on the outer hull of the ships. Is it actually possible that the ships in that battle fleet that were engaging a system didn't activate their shields? Or was it an error by the writers? 72.92.153.26 22:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shielding problems 

message: I am in favor of merging this article into the Dominion War article. Thoughts? Dheppens (talk) 07:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. I was about to redirect it to Tears of the Prophets, with a "if you're looking for the other appearance, go to Changing Face of Evil" flag at the top of that destination. I think either is fine. --EEMIV (talk) 11:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree, the star system in question only plays a part in the Star Trek universe trough the dominion wars, and as a stand alone article I don't think it has much value --Erlend Aakre (talk) 19:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Danah boyd

message: Hi, Yes, I did write my comment before your comment and rewrite - I just didn't change it when there was a collision.  I'm still not sure she is notable.  2 mentions in newspapers and an appearance on TV doesn't sound like much to me.  Nor is a dozen op-ed pieces, conferences papers, and the like.  Certainly can't fault her self-promotion efforts, but not inclined to reward them either.  I would like to know if she was aware of, or participated in this AFD.  Not it matters if she did.  Regards, Ben Aveling 12:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I told her about it at some point... and she just said, "It's weird." I don't think she cares much. -- Joebeone (Talk) 01:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Curzon Dax

message: During an orb experience in Deep Space Nine episode Emissary, Curzon was alive on the surgical table when Dax was being transfered to Jadzia. Jadzia even called to him. Mainphramephreak 09:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What of it? --Mperry 15:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article says that he died on Risa. He may have had the heart attack there, but he was on Trill for the transference of Dax to Jadzia. Mainphramephreak 12:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curzon's Death 

message: I have added a quality assessment rating and importance rating to this article. Feel free to change them as the article improves! Also, feel free to add more issues to the list below, and strike them out (strike) when they're completed. — OranL (talk) 01:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Les Liaisons dangereuses (film)

message: I recently got the soundtrack to the film, and it's credited to Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers with no mention of Thelonious Monk. The Jazz Discography Project entry on the album concurs with my recording's credits, as does the All Music Guide entry. I was unable to find a mention of the soundtrack in the Jazz Discography Project entry on Thelonious Monk, nor is there a mention of the soundtrack on the Thelonious Monk Wikipedia page. However, the soundtrack is listed as #47 on the Art Blakey discography Wikipedia entry.  I'm aware that the All Movie Guide entry cites Monk. The IMDB entry credits James Campbell, Duke Jordan & Thelonious Monk	as composers, however it also credits Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers along with Monk in the Music Department section of the credits. Does anyone own the film, and can check the credits? If not, I'll see if I can screen a copy. mtmont (talk) 23:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Score: Monk or Blakey?

message: The official french title is "Les Liaisons dangereuses 1960" (see the french Wikipedia).  So maybe this title has to be changed in English ?
--AXRL (talk) 11:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Les Liaisons dangereuses 1960