Talk:Camelot Software Planning

message: Does anyone have anything other than rumours to back up the inclusion of Golden Sun 3 in the list? A Google reveals two things: Camelot said something about making it (, but the link on Camelot's site seems dead - can't read Japanese, though), and also said something about not making it, being tied up with a major, unnamed title (Google for it, there are references to this everywhere). Seeing as these are both several years old, I think we can surmise that GS3 is fanmade vapourware, and should be duly removed from the list. Any objections? --Sam Pointon 01:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only official Camelot title is an unnamed next-gen RPG mostly likely for the Revolution. Jedi6 03:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the success of the series, I just can't see Camelot *NOT* making. But until there's official confirmation, "Golden Sun 3" doesn't belong here. DMAJohnson 04:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its been so long, everybody is despairing now. -Izaak
In regards to the RPG for DS listed as "confirmed": As much as I truly would love to believe that, is it even real? An IP added that there. Is a news story of a DS RPG in development actually anywhere on the internet? If so, that should definitely be cited as a source. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Donate) 17:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm removing it, since there is no evidence at all (that I can find) that they are making an RPG for the DS. Also, the Wii RPG needs a source, though I think that will be easy found.Slimeknight 22:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, now that I look, it doesn't seem that it is confirmed at all really. The only real source I could find was this  but that is pretty questionable so I think it'll have to go into a new "rumored" section or something. Slimeknight 15:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GS3

message: Is Camelot truely responsible for all of the Shining games mentioned in the game list? Shining in the Darkness at least is described on its own entry as being developed by Climax.
:Camelot Software Planning wasn't, Sonic Software Planning was. The article omits that Camelot was an internal Sega group called Sonic first, the younger one of the Takahashi brothers separated from Sega in 1995 by forming Camelot doing games independently from Sonic but also working together on Shining the Holy Ark and Shining Force. After the Dreamcast related friction in 1998 Sonic left Sega as well and all of the staff reunited in the independent Camelot. Someone needs to rewrite the article. Se also  and  -- 88.217.50.62 (talk) 23:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shining series

message: http://www.rpgfan.com/news/2008/1376.html
Hey, SF Feather is being made by Flight Plan.  For the DS.  It has nothing to do with Camelot or the Takahashi brothers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.138.8.34 (talk) 21:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shining Force Feather 

message: Anybody have anything akin to a citation for this? It sounds awfully dubious...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.147.132 (talk) 04:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nintendo Wants a Remake for SF3 on Wii? 

message: should they be listed here and if so, should they be indicated as such? Nbisbo (talk) 07:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They should not be listed here because they were not developed by Camelot. Sonic! Software Planning was a separate entity with its own credits and should have its own article. Shining Lore (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do about the Sonic! games