Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/RK 2/Evidence

message: The Arbitration Committee can decide for itself which material on the Evidence page to consider and which to ignore.  Do not move the additions of other editors to here unless you are an AC member engaged in clean-up.  --Zero 04:51, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: Apparently RK is very biased against many people and will resort to any means including misusing wikipedia to achieve what he wants. His recent biased POV edits to chabad have proven this. --Truthaboutchabad 00:09, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Robert has evidence that there are indeed subgroups of Chabad Lubavitch that insist the Rebbe is a Godly reincarnation. Please discuss this with him, rather than coming here to rant. Not everything that you are uncomfortable with is false. JFW | T@lk 00:47, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Robert seems to have "evidence" thatis made up by his biased mind. REMEMBER that Wikipedia needs to have a NEUTRAL point of view! --Truthaboutchabad 02:11, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Truthaboutchabad

message: :You seem confused.  Martin Harper (MyRedDice) decided to imagine that he was my enemy, and thus made up a list of everyone who ever attacked me, and all of my responses to them.  What does that have to do with the current question - Why an additional ban after the four month ban?  You and others keep rehashing the past, trying to prevent the Wikipedia process from working.  Stop the anger and personal attacks, and concentrate on the present: Nothing above is evidence for any new problem. Please try and find ways to make Wikipedia work, ok? RK 00:49, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
::Why do you insist on claiming to know what goes on inside other peoples' heads? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 17:13, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
:: My list is, as it states, a list of people attacked by Robert "fuck you sick Nazi bastards" Kaiser. I did not bother discovering "who started it" in each case, as I am not a primary school teacher.
:: RK's speculations about my motivation are erroneous. My actual rationale is on the page itself. Martin 17:11, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: RK was banned for one year from editing Jewish related article. He just showed up recently after a 4-month ban and is demanding that the one-year ban should be lifted. Why should it be lifted? We don't know whether RK's behavior has changed. At least wait five months where he can demonstrate that he can edit Wikipedia without resorting to his trademark personal insults and other abuses (calling people Nazis, anti-Semites, calling the whole community Nazipedia). Since he is back, he has already been involved in a dispute. He has already started posting insults and accusations, like against Zero on the mailing list (see evidence). Why should the ban be lifted without requiring him to demonstrate for five or six months that he can edit Wikipedia without his trade mark personal insults and other abuses?  OneGuy 13:27, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dissident

message: I removed the above text from the evidence page. The  section headers are the from the evidence section headers on the evidence page and are not necessarily the same people who actually made the comments. My reasons for doing this are to keep the evidence page short and sweet, and  try to have only evidence on the page. Please use this talk page for discussions, opinions etc. Abitrators will read both pages. Theresa Knott  (ask the rotten) 07:45, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: End of moved text