Talk:Stephanie Birkitt

message: :Image:Stephtor.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Stephtor.jpg

message: Added notability. I do recall she used to frequently appear on Letterman's show but hasn't appeared in years. Is someone who once appeared on a late night show notable? I say no but you be the judge. Mundilfari (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: well I'd say she is notable now...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.228.130.0 (talk) 18:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag

message: TMZ says that she's one of the staffers involved in this. Is TMZ a considered a reliable source for this to be added to the article? They scooped everyone on Michael Jackson's death so I think they should be considered a reliable source.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xPre-Wwz9I&feature=player_embedded
:Not just TMZ.  ABC News, Fox News, NY Post.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.122.71.68 (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: David Letterman extortion plot

message: Is Stephanie (and the other 'backstage' crew) really an actress? Does anyone know this definitively? DJ Clayworth 15:21, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: When the Late Show runs long credits at the end of the show, Stephanie is listed as an "Assistant to David Letterman."  She really does work on the show as a staff member and is not an actress.  The same goes for the vast majority of extras you see on the show.  Alan Kalter really is the announcer, Biff Henderson really is a stage manager, Pat and Kenny work as staff members, etc.  --Rookkey 17:30, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  An actress

message: Please to wkfy the 3rd ref, its: 
-- 67.98.206.2 (talk) 18:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: n.b. I didn't include a URL as the one currently given seems to be broken. -- 67.98.206.2 (talk) 18:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:    Set Sail For The Seven Seas  323° 58' 0" NET   21:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wkfy ref 

message: Now, Stephanie Birkitt’s name has been dragged through the mud as she emerged as one of the women at the center of the extortion plot against the CBS funnyman.
Birkitt, 34, dated accused extortionist Robert (Joe) Halderman before the Emmy Award-winning producer was charged with concocting a bizarre plot to expose Letterman’s dalliances with “Late Show” staffers.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2009/10/02/2009-10-02_from_david_lettermans_perky_sidekick_stephanie_birkitt_is_now_woman_in_the_middl.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.50.138.234 (talk) 23:28, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steph and davids affair 

message: The issue is easy for me. This article should stay because of Birkitt's affair with Letterman. Had she never had sex with him, she would not be notable. Perhaps some of you are asking, does having sex make one notable? It does when one has it with a famous person under ethically questionable circumstances. Perhaps some of you remember a young woman named Monica Lewinsky? (Please note that Lewinsky has an article on Wikipedia.) Moby-Dick3000 (talk) 02:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep the article

message: The deletion discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Birkitt, not at this Talk page. There is no guarantee that any comments left here will be considered in the deletion discussion. Propaniac (talk) 13:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If the clear result of this 2009 deletion discussion was keep, why was a new notability tag added in July 2014?  This article has been getting hundreds of views per day, and yesterday it got a spike of 12,000 (the result of renewed publicity that came with Letterman's retirement).  I am removing the notability tag.  HowardMorland (talk) 17:35, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion discussion