lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wilson Audio

message: The Sophia is no longer the most affordable two channel speakers from Wilson anymore. In fact, the first generation Sophia is no longer in production for it has been replaced by Sophia 2. The most affordable speakers from Wilson is now the Duette. Please ammend this inaccuracy. 149.169.109.34 09:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I made some very large changes to this page since a lot of the information was either out of date or incorrect.  I do have permission from Wilson Audio to post the information that I did.  I wanted to give the most up to date information on products, reviews, history, etc.  so that people could to better educated on this company.
These changes were made and then removed.  I undid the the edit and went through and took out any "opinions" I could find to try to keep it as factual as possible. Debby (lildebs) 4/29/2010 11:39PM
:Unfortunately, you haven't followed the procedures for donating copyrighted material (and it read like an advert, anyways). Take a minute to read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and Wikipedia:SPAM#Advertisements_masquerading_as_articles before making more changes to the article. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Wilson Audio
Talk:The King of Fighters Neowave

message: I'm curious to know the story or relevance to these being listed, or where this information is even coming from. Considering that Neowave has no storyline or special endings for any teams, I don't know what this is all about. Any answers out there? TalonIH (talk) 02:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Special" Teams? 

message: "However, due to licensing issues with Eolith, Angel and May Lee (who were created for the Eolith-developed KOF 2001) were omitted from the PAL release of the PS2 port and the later Xbox port released in North America and Europe."
Well that's odd, because I played as both of them in my PS2 PAL version of the game. Making changes. Mysterious Bob 17:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Characters 

message: Shouldn't Omega Rugal and everyone listed in the boss section be listed as playable? They are unlocked after beating them in survival mode and pressing right trigger on a specific character.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.193.12 (talk) 04:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playable Characters 

message: Can someone please tell me how to beat Omega Rugal in the Survival Mode of KOF NeoWave? It's so difficult to knock him off! 86.32.44.52 (talk) 21:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rugal Bernstein 

message: From the article " while the Xbox version was the only home version released in North America.". Yet on the right panel, JP/US and EU releases are mentioned for Xbox? Chopper Dave (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xbox release
Talk:Wentworth Park

message: edited the introduction of this page to make it more informative and to the point of its being. It now explains that Wentworth Park was the home ground for the extinct Glebe Dirty Reds. Very important history pointing out where the history blood lines started for this rugby league club in 1908.[[[User:Bradley1956|Bradley1956]] 09:16, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: needs expanding, to show that the sports complex, is a part of the larger green area also known as, the whole being built on BlackWattle Bay/Swamp and not so much the greyhound or speedway in the current context Dave Rave (talk) 07:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wentworth Park v Wentworth Park Sporting Complex Dave Rave (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is going to get a refocus, as the park, that it is. And the current contents are going to the WP Sporting Complex. When I get to it ... Dave Rave (talk) 04:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:Radirgy

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support as the nominator. TJ Spyke 09:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support as the nominator. TJ Spyke 09:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: I assume the article's name of Radilgy presupposes that the chosen letters for the contraction are Radio Allergy, but I think the official romanization as Radirgy actually derives from Radio Allergy. Am I wrong in assuming that this could be the case? ChaosAngelZero (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No; "radilgy" stems from a racism kick Elm-39 - T/C/N 21:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct romanization
Talk:CityRail DDIU

message: Shouldn't there be a common summary article about CityRail sets, and all existing pages named in a standard fashion e.g. by their letter codes e.g. V-Set (CityRail), T-Set (CityRail) etc? The current array is pretty messy and there is no table to link them all together as per the CityTrain, Connex Melbourne and other Australian systems. SM247 09:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Same thing as V Set (train) but only with very little detail. Merge the two and rename V-Set (CityRail) or V Set (CityRail). SM247 01:52, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with V Set (train) 

message: DIM8020 and DET9216 are not notable enough for their own articles - not even for a gunzel, I would say. Merge into this one and very brief info only. Alternately should be merged with the Glenbrook train disaster. SM247 01:55, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with individual cars
Talk:Rajamanikyam

message: Wikipedia isn't a place to post Movie Reviews!! rohith 17:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Superexploitation

message: The whole thing stinks of POV.  Unless it is greatly embellished and neutralized, it could easily be folded into Exploitation or Marxian Economics or something.  Salvor Hardin 09:51, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While the article could do with references, it seems to me to be an accurate but brief description of the Marxist theory. Warofdreams talk 12:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is of dubious value
Talk:Mitch Bainwol

message: Hello fellow editors! I am just writing this to let you know that my goal in editing this page is to provide a more rounded profile of who Mitch Bainwol is and what he does. Although I hold a considerable amount of disdain toward the RIAA, I will make sure to remain unbiased and simply present information that will be helpful in creating a more informative article. Please let me know if any of you feel I am pushing the policy limits or doing anything that could be considered unacceptable. Thanks. Gunheim (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Le Smoking

message: If anyone could help me find the copyright for this image (by Helmut Newton) I'd greatly appreciate it thanks. - {{Caliah 10:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Deschutes River

message: This question came up during Wikipedia Oregon's appearance on OPB's Talk Out Loud show: http://www.opb.org/thinkoutloud/shows/encyclopedic-ambitions/ 
Anybody got any ideas?
:On the Deschutes River there is what looks to be a hand made sign on the trail on the east bank of the river north of hwy 26 and Warm Springs. The sign explains that at that spot a military expedition was camped in the mid 1800s and a slave who was with the outfit was killed in a brawl with one of the soldiers. I have always wanted to know more about this story and how the sign came to be. choo — Fri May 8th 9:14a.m.
--Esprqii (talk) 16:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Could it have been the Meek Cutoff expedition? or whatever party blazed the Santiam Wagon Road? This would be a fun one to research; many of the books linked at our Research Desk page may be helpful. -Pete (talk) 19:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  mid-1800s military expedition? 

message: The Deschutes is considered a success story in terms of collaborative water management that has led recently to significant increases in summertime instream flows.  It seems a section or two should be added to summarize these accomplishments.  Perhaps information from the Deschutes River Conservancy could be included? http://www.deschutesriver.org/  
I am not an expert, just noted the lack of discussion.  (Robertopennington (talk) 21:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Conservation, Water Banking and increased Instream Flows 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 07:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 July 2023
Talk:Korean Bell of Friendship

message: The Article looks good to me . . .   We live ten minutes from the Friendship Bell and attend the ringing on 4th of July.  If you have any questions, we will respond.  Thanks for a great article, with pictures. — Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 19:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Article looks good to me . . .
Talk:If You Could See Me Now (Ahern novel)

message: Is it just me, or does the text of the article read more like the blurb on the back of a book than like an encyclopedia entry? TRiG 09:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Trapped in a stifling small, Elizabeth Egan had always been known as a serious woman, never laughing at jokes or taking joys from the simplest pleasure of life.
Trapped in a stifling small ... Huh? TRiG 09:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where does this article come from?
Talk:Edgar Schoen

message: This page badly needs some balance. -- Hugh7 10:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In which direction?Zandrous 18:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unbalanced

message: I guess since there is somehow problems with my edit ill have to open this thread up. Why are you all reverting my edits still?Cirflow (talk) 04:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article restructuring 

message: I am deleting the entire "Views on lead poisoning" section as an utter disaster, in terms of our policy on biographies of living persons. It starts with a claim that he is "widely criticized", without any source claiming so. It does have four examples of what I presume are claimed to be criticism of him, one of which is a WP:SPS, one of which is an unpublished BA thesis, and one of which only mentions him in an attributional footnote. There is a claim about the nature of his publications sourced to a resume that does not make that claim, and there is something held up as "exemplary" criticism with no source claiming that it is so. This is a poorly formulated attack section. There may be room for a piece of an article on his views on lead poisoning, but it should actually cover, you know, his views on lead poisoning. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Views on lead poisoning 
Talk:Where Rainbows End

message: Book reviews are unencyclopedic, and violate the rule forbidding original research. If there are no objections I'll delete the section in its entirety. Alexrexpvt (talk) 23:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. –Pomte 16:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Book review
Talk:Blomberg B

message: This is poorly worded:
"A hydraulic snubber was used in place of the other cylinder."
That makes it sound like the snubber somehow has something to do with braking and whether or not to have one or two cylinders per side.  It happens to be in the same location and it's possible that the design eliminated the cylinder to make room (I have no idea) but surely it's not a matter of one replacing the other in terms of brake function. Filmteknik (talk) 20:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Pac-Man Vs.

message: Translate this page:
http://www.bandainamcogames.co.jp/mobile/softbank/namcogames/namcogames_action.html#24
The description sounds just like Pac-Man VS! Should info about this mobile version be added?
Ashum Besher (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile Phone Version?
Talk:Pedro Medina (murderer)

message: :An article that has been around since 2005, about a subject that committed murder, and who's face mask caught on fire, has only one working references that is about the mask. This means the article is actually referenced (general) by the "External links". 
:Lacking referencing the article severely lacks inline citations and any possible text-source integrity. The purpose of referencing, aside from showing notability of a subject, is to "check that the material is sourced" preventing possible original research or plagiarism. Otr500 (talk) 12:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues and notability 
Talk:Antarctopelta

message: Where's the page for the unnamed (or recently named) theropod found in Antarctica? Thanks! AstroHurricane001 01:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it hasn't been named yet, there can't be an article. We can't very well call an article "unnamed Antarctic theropod", can we? Do you mean the Case/Martin find, or something else? Firsfron of Ronchester 07:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if it has been named or not. Most sources say that it hasn't been named, but then again, it could just be outdated and it also says that Antarctopelta hasn't been named either. I'm thinking it was probably found somewhere near the Antarctopelta discovery, probably near Vega Island and South America, but I'm not sure. I'm not looking for Cryolophosaurus, and I'm not sure which one is the Case/Martin find. A book says it's a theropod somewhat bigger than a human, and I think it's about 2-3 m (~10 ft) long and ~2 m (~7 ft) tall. Maybe a web search would help. AstroHurricane001 13:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Antarctic dinosaurs has just the two entries, Antarctopelta and Cryolophosaurus. The Case/Martin theropod discovery is discussed here, but is not yet named. Firsfron of Ronchester 16:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unamed Theropod
Talk:Gasparinisaura

message: I founded a episode called Gilbert the Junior Conductor and Scott Sapsom says that the smallest herbivore of all was Gasparinisaura.
Why he says it that not appeared in dinosaur train.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.177.220.111 (talk) 03:30, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaur Train
Talk:Genyodectes

message: So far as is known, is this the last surviving member of the 'classic' Ceratosaur line?  I don't have access to any paper post-2004. If it is, the article should note it. Has other material for this animal been found? 104.169.31.99 (talk) 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  youngest member of Ceratosaurs?
Talk:Gongxianosaurus

message: The descriptions in 1998 and 2000 did not designate any type material nor provided a diagnosis. The name at the time was thus a nomen nudum. Does anyone know whether some subsequent publication remedied this?--MWAK (talk) 05:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The original description of He et al (1998) contains both a diagnosis and designations of the type and paratypes. Do I miss something? --Jens Lallensack (talk) 09:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: To the contrary, it was I who made a mistake, at least in overlooking the diagnosis. But I still can't find a holotype or paratype number. Admittedly, I'm basing myself on the "paleoglot" translation by Will Downs. Are these designations present in the Chinese original? And if so, what are they?--MWAK (talk) 13:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, they only say they selected a type, but without giving any specimen numbers, so this is kind of useless … --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. However, even if the fixation of a holotype is seen as failed (which is only true if today no evidence at all can be found to determine which actual specimen they meant in 1998), the name is still valid under article 72.1.1. ICZN, the specimens reported from the location acting as syntypes. So I was wrong to think it ever was a nomen nudum.--MWAK (talk) 06:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Still a ''nomen nudum''?
Talk:Heptasteornis

message: So we know the fossils are fragmentary... but how much of the skeleton was found? What parts of the skeleton were found? This would be nice to know. 71.217.114.221 04:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What material? 
Talk:Huaxiagnathus

message: WHY is this dinosaur under the category "Dinosaurs of North America"?? Huaxiagnathus is from China! 75.211.104.173 (talk) 04:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fixed now. J. Spencer (talk) 05:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Incisivosaurus

message: Hello, I have noticed that the temporal range listed in this article is inaccurate; specifically the arrow placed on the timeline does not match the rest of the article. Unfortunately I do not know how to fix this so I am trying to bring it to the attention of someone who does.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.229.117.143 (talk) 05:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporal Range
Talk:Inosaurus

message: There's no point to worry about Inosaurus being a chimera of different taxa. Lapparent never explicitly designated a holotype for Inosaurus tedtreftensis, so the vertebrae from Niger are syntypes while the Bahariya vertebrae are merely referred specimens. The morphology of the vertebrate suggests a possible therizinosaur affinity for Inosaurus (http://home.comcast.net/~eoraptor/Therizinosauroidea.htm#Inosaurustedreftensis). If Inosaurus is a therizinosaur, it would be first confirmed occurrence of a therizinosaur from Gondwana, considering that all other therizinosaurs are known only from Laurasia. 68.4.28.33 (talk) 15:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remains 
Talk:Isisaurus

message: Hello! I have been closely monitoring the pages of Indian Dinosaurs and working on revising some of them. My concern revolves around both Jainosaurus and Isisaurus for now. Both their Wikipedia pages mention that their lengths were 18 metres, the page about Isisaurus even mentions the weight of the animal. However, neither page cites any sources for their estimates. I spent a lot of effort to find any verification for these estimates, I for example read every single piece of literature I could find on these two animals online. Unfortunately none of them estimates the sizes of either animals. As a last ditch effort, I emailed Dr. Wilson and Prof. D’Emic, both of whom authored the detailed reassessment of Indian Titanosaurs in 2010. They both told me that no estimates for the sizes of these animals actually exist due to insufficient material.
That’s right, the estimates on both the pages don’t have any sources to back them up and come from nowhere. As such, I am removing both the pages’ claims about the animals’ sizes for now under Wikipedia’s no original research policy.
The good news is that Dr. Wilson did refer me to a method to determine the size of Sauropods by analysing the cross sections of their femur and humerus to determine their mass. This method might be possible to be applied to Jainosaurus, and I am going to do it, if I come to any conclusions about their sizes I will try my best to get the research published in a peer reviewed journal and finally cite the size of at least one of these dinosaurs. But for now, consider their sizes indeterminate.
Thanks, have a good day,
Ansh Ansh Saxena 7163 (talk) 10:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the size estimates for now
Talk:Kelmayisaurus

message: Shouldn't Kelmayisaurus gigantus become an article?Dinosaur Fan (talk) 07:17, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it is not a valid name, so no. FunkMonk (talk) 14:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kelmayisaurus gigantus
Talk:Koparion

message: it is known from a tooth, i just wonder is it still dubious or valid?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 240E:FF:B001:4817:2D4F:C649:B14B:C44A (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  is koparion valid? 
Talk:Krzyzanowskisaurus

message: Justin Tweet updated the Dinosauromorpha page by removing Krzyzanowskisaurus from this page, saying that this genus represents a pseudosuchian like Revueltosaurus. He considered the possibility that Krzyzanowskisaurus, despite having a cingulum on the teeth, might have represented an archosaur whose cingulum evolved independently of ornithischians. 72.194.116.63 15:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, that's pretty much how it was stated in Irmis, R.B., Parker, W.G., Nesbitt, S.J., and Liu, J. (2006); in fact, it might just be another species of Revueltosaurus, as was originally proposed. J. Spencer 21:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Emília Sičáková-Beblavá

message: There seems to be good evidence that this article is accurate on important points. Even though I couldn't verify every detail, I hope it was reasonable to remove the verify tag. --HJMG 11:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification
Talk:Kunmingosaurus

message: Kumningosaurus has officially been described by Dong (1992), so its status as a nomen nudum has already been removed. 
Dong, 1992. Dinosaurian Faunas of China. China Ocean Press (Beijing). 192 pp.68.4.61.168 (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description  
Talk:The Invitation (Thirteen Senses album)

message: Long story short, I was looking for 'Angels and Spies' when I noticed that my version of 'The Invitation' only has 11 tracks (with 11 being Automatic). It was bought in Germany about 2 years ago, for statistics. 
This also seems to be confirmed by iTunes, which has the same 11 plus 'Lights Out', which I would assume is a new track since it's not on 'Contact' either and wiki doesn't list it on 'Falls in the Dark'. » byeee 00:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angels and Spies
Talk:List of geological features on Saturn's smaller moons

message: This is silly.  Shouldn't there be separate lists for each satellite? - Brownlee 11:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Royal University of Bhutan

message: It says that there are ten member institutions but only nine are listed! - Brownlee 11:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Great Morava

message: :Either as a very fertile land, or as a natural path between Europe and Asia, Morava river valley attracted humans from early times. 
All important rivers attracted humans from early times. bogdan 12:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it not more reasonable to assume that it has the same origin as: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morava_(river) ?
Muvojed (talk) 16:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: we always need sources meeting WP:RS, otherwise it is original research. Doug Weller talk 16:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology?
Talk:Angus MacLise

message: If you know, please insert. Design 12:16, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality?

message: I don't see any. Have they been cleaned up or am I missing them? 71.171.214.47 16:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. If HisSpaceResearch doesn't try to actually defend or explain his tagging eventually, I'm going to delete it. MQDuck 14:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  My guess is that it's the word legendary in the first para that set off the alarms. Its not totally necessary. Wwwhatsup 20:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peacocks

message: Could somebody elaborate on the "calendar" that his contemporaries use to this day? I'm interested in what kind of dating system he used.
Gill066 (talk) 17:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calendar? 

message: I'm always curious to know how/where people started out. And how did he make a living in Nepal etc., was he a trust fund baby, or did he perform, or what?
Rosekelleher (talk) 20:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life? 