Talk:Ethnic groups in the Caucasus

message: the article is called Caucasian peoples, but as it contains not only Caucasian peoples  (ethnic groups) but also Indo-Europeans and Altaic group, the Article should re renamed to THE PEOPLES OF THE CAUCASUS!!!!! PLEASE, change the name, otherwise it makes no sense.
ALSO, i modified photo gallery from being divided into REGIONAL to ETHNIC and LINGUISTIC groups! DO not Edit!
thnx!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickniko (talk • contribs) 13:54, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAME OF THE ARTICLE 

message: Some anon changed all instances in this article of the word "peoples" to "people". Personally, it doesn't make much sense. This article contians lists of many different ethnic groups, not just one. Also, it sounds better in English. —Khoikhoi 04:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i totally agree with Khoikhoi, the move was needed to clarify and address the question of other ethnic groups living in Caucasus besides Caucasian ethnic group. Thanks. Ldingley 17:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  People(s) 

message: I thought maybe someone should include a section to the article discussing/explaining the "race" of the peoples of the Caucasus. That is to say, which would be considered "white" and which would be considered "Asian", etc etc.
I lack the knowledge to make such an edit myself.
Static Sleepstorm 09:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race of peoples of the Caucasus 

message: Well, among caucasians there is blondes, but they are rare and couldn't represent caucasians. 159.148.71.250 06:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much blondes in pictures 

message: :Image:Village people Azerbaijan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.Caucasians are sick and they are very racial and horrible for what they did to African Americans in Slavery. Well most white people are horrible.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 16:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Village people Azerbaijan.jpg

message: :Image:Azeribaycana.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Azeribaycana.jpg

message: A slow edit-war seems to go on here. Some people seem to include Mingrelian, Laz and Svan people under the hyperonym "Georgians" while some others don't and separate them. To me, putting them into seperate groups, and not subgroups of Georgians, makes more sense, but I'm not sure... I demand this to be discussed here. Mingrelian, Laz and Svan are clearly different languages from Georgian (and not dialects), that's for sure... but are they each a people on their own? — N-true (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Halloo, first of all i want to thank you your contributions to this and many other articles concerning Caucasus and specifically Georgia. BUT as you can not have perfectly prominent knowledge of every language of the world, allow me to explain some minor details about Georgia and its Languages.
Adjarian is not a different Language, they speak normal Georgian with some Dialect. every region of Georgia (12 of them) has it's own Dialect that differs from literature language with some intonations and sometimes short list of words. For comparison would you classify German spoken in Bremen (north) and Berlin as different Languages? SO, please STOP editing the section!!!
When it comes Svan, Megrelia and laz, as u might know they, together with modern Georgia Deliver from one, proto-Georgian(Kartvelian that is translated as "Georgian" into Georgian)language and status of them as independent languages is still debatable (fore more eminence, something simmilar to Hochdeustch und Bairisch dialcets), although should be noted that I, as a native literature-Georgian speaker, would not be able to understand Megrelian or Svan (although can catch some common words and very common Grammatical structure). that is why i live it in separate languages (although i changed People link to Language link). 
Hope we cleared it out. I am pretty sure that Southern Caucasian Language section looks perfect now, so no editing is needed.
Thnx again |\| ! |{ () 11:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Georgians, Mingrelians, Laz, Svans 

message: This article quite clearly states in its first line that the "concept" of Caucasian race is dealt with elsewhere. This article is about the actual peoples who live in the Caucasus. The concept of Caucasian race is outdated and unscientific, as the article about Caucasian race clearly states. Some information which was previously in this article (Peoples of the Caucasus) did not take the criticism in the Caucasian race article on board, was romanticised and unbalanced, and was irrelevant to this article in any case, and it was therefore deleted. It has now reappeared, and I propose to delete it again. I suggest that anyone who disagrees with this approach should discuss the matter on the talk page. If a section on this is included again (why???) it should at least correspond to the NPOV coverage the "concept" gets in Caucasian race. Bofoc Tagar (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-insertion of Caucasian "race" bit is inappropriate 

message: The Article is called "Peoples of the Caucasus" when it almost entirely talks about the languages of the peoples of the Caucasus. 
Will be nice if information like Ethnic and historical backgrounds, statistical data etc. will be added, otherwise makes no sense to keep Article under current name, "The languages of the Peoples of the Caucasus" might be more acceptable. BTW similar article exists - Languages of the Caucasus   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickniko (talk • contribs) 15:20, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of the Article and the Name 

message: I don't understand. Can someone please explain the characteristics of Caucasian people (physical features)
thank you
Miebi (talk) 23:49, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I thought the article was meant to describe the people of Caucasia 

message: North Caucasian is too broad a category, and two of the groups listed there - Ossetians and Cossacks (especially Cossacks) - don't belong there at all. It should be broken up, and Ossetians and Cossacks should be given an Indo-European category, or something like that. Maybe Ossetians are vaguely North Caucasian as they have certain cultural traits that they picked up from their neighbors.... but Cossacks are not Caucasian at all really. They copied some things, but they are definitely far more Russian (i.e. Northeastern European, Slavic, with some Turkic influence, etc...) than they are Caucasian. --Yalens (talk) 21:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And also... could someone get a good picture of Makka Sagaipova for Chechens? Because she is a very good example of the ideal (perhaps not shared by a majority of Chechen women, but rather the ideal, you know what I mean?) Chechen female in appearance :).--Yalens (talk) 21:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: North Caucasian pictures

message: Cossacks are Ukrainians, although they may speak Russian dialects.  They are of Ukrainian ethnic origin, and the "Cossack nation"  was part of Ukraine.  The Cossacks are doubtlessly part of the Ukrainian ethnic group.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.27.186 (talk) 22:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cossacks 

message: Someone needs to add the Ayrums/Hayhurums who are an Urum people, descendants of Greek colonialists in the Caucasus. They are similar to the Pontic Greeks and other Caucasian people of Greek descent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.68.163.64 (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ayrums/Urums/Hayhurums 

message: Anyone has problems with calling this article Peoples of the Caucasus ? It was proposed years ago and it seems the most logical. Mash Talk 18:49, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have renamed it back. Caucasian peoples and peoples of the Caucasus are not the same. For example Ossetians live in the Caucasus but their language is not Caucasian.--Bouron (talk) 09:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename Article 

message: I think the galleries in the article violate WP:IG. That persons are not the whole peoples so that images can't illustrate the topic of this article. Sher doesn't illustrate Armenian people. Such the galleries maybe good as decorations but not as in the section named Ethnic groups.
I suggest to delete them.--Bouron (talk) 10:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am deleting the galleries...--Bouron (talk) 12:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galleries 

message: Why are Turkish people not in the list for Turkic peoples. Turks constitute the largest ethnic group in Artvin, Ardahan and Kars which are generally considered part of the Caucasus80.43.13.144 (talk) 23:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish People 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Peoples of the Caucasus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216032153/http://www.tabasaran.com/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=171 to http://www.tabasaran.com/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=171
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: This map has nothing to with reality. It needs to be reworked as soon as possible. Please who's the person in charge of editing this article rework it. Or let other people do this for you. Otherwise this article is pretty much smells like lies. I don't mention the map doesn't include turkish people in Artvin and oversized look of kurdish-speaking people, also after the second Karabakh War armenian population in lower karabakh area is 0 so you should edit this too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EntityRrr (talk • contribs) 17:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-sense of used map