lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abrams, Wisconsin

message: 54101 (920) area code.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.106.49.58 (talk) 20:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  zip code area code 

message: Hello, There is an article on this exact subject (Abrams (CDP), Wisconsin). I propose merging into this article. Thanks, Geardona (talk to me?) 01:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not identical, but overlapping, and sufficiently similar to be covered together.  Klbrain (talk) 17:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Wikipedia talk:Courtesy blanking

message: Would it make sense to protect these pages then? If the front page is to be blanked, it does not make sense that it needs to be continually monitored for non-blanking. --HappyCamper 20:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In most cases, we don't protect pages until it has become clear that inappropriate editing is likely to continue. That usually means that something has had to be reverted several times in a relatively short period. -- Donald Albury 03:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is true, but why leave the page for "babysitting" then? --HappyCamper 03:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is built on the principal that anyone can edit any page. Page protection is a last ditch, temporary solution for all pages, justified only by levels of vandalism that make it very difficult to edit and maintain a page. -- Donald Albury 03:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not thinking of vandalism specifically. But this is a measure that is rarely used. That is a different matter. I would be the sort that would not rule out this option. Protect if necessary, but not necessarily. --HappyCamper 03:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protect pages? 

message: This "guideline" doesn't say anything about "consensus"--in fact, it's rather vague and arbitrary as to when "courtesy blanking" (censorship) occurs. I'd say that calls for a vote. ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 04:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  quite arbitrary and vague
Talk:Nova M Radio

message: Does this meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia?  Please comment.  Thanks Dubc0724 20:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let it stay, AAR and Nova M may eventually become one and the same. At that point we can merge the articles and redirect the links to the one corporate page. As for notability requirements, there are articles of far less note on wikipedia so I don't see any reason to remove it. Someone took the time to write the article, which is actually pretty well written and NPOV for what seems like a first draft (judging by the lack of "Talk" and age of the last entry); we should appreciate that effort.Vinnievesh 06:09, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

text: With their current efforts as a startup radio network, I do believe Nova M will become even more noteworthy in the months to come. I do believe they are notable. I wrote the original article, though it is in dire need of updating. --Fightingirish 15:30, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Compare this with the discussion of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Genesis_Communications_Network.  The rationale for deletion seemed to center around the number of affiliates, lack of notability of its hosts (Barry Lynn is probably more notable than any host on Nova M), and lack of web site traffic.  Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - potential of future notability doesn't make an article's subject notable.StreamingRadioGuide 20:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When the above was written, NovaM (OST's precursor) had Randi Rhodes on board, who has appeared on the cover of Talkers Magazine, and been highly rated by them. Huw Powell (talk) 01:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

text: If the article were specifically about OST, it would arguably not be notable. But the article is about both Nova M and OST as its successor. Nova M/OST may not be Air America, but it was certainly a notable company. It had dozens of affiliates, two notable progressive talk radio hosts (anyone arguing Mike Malloy is not notable is either totally unfamiliar with progressive talk radio or biased against it), and was in business for over two years. Nova M/OST were unquestionably significant in the history of American progressive talk radio, and deserve to be acknowledged on Wikipedia. Fun3tubs (talk) 19:27, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:6mm PPC

message: I removed the following statement:
Being that the bullet diameter is 0.243", a 0.2" pattern essentially means that all 5 bullets are in the same hole.
Because it is incorrect. Group size is typically measured center-to-center, meaning a .2" group with a .243 caliber rifle would have an outside measurement of .443. Having a .2" hole from a .243 bullet is not possible, even with one shot, your best group outside measurement would be .243. The 5 bullets may all be in the same hole, and a very small hole it is indeed, but it is not a single hole of the caliber used. Arthurrh 21:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same hole 

message: The article had a claim that the 6PPC was the most efficient 6mm cartridge available "producing a higher velocity with less powder than any other 6mm". Without having a reliable source, it's a pretty strong bordering on ridiculous statement so I removed it. Obviously somewhat smaller cartridges with light bullets produce higher velocities per charge than larger cases. However there are even smaller 6mm cartridges that are even more efficient with light bullets. For example take a look at the 6x45mm (aka 6mm-223) and the 6x47mm. Both produce higher velocities with a 60 grain bullet and BL-C(2) powder than the 6PPC. (Data from Hodgdons using max loads for that bullet/cartridge/powder combination).
Cartridge        	Bullet Weight	Powder 	Charge	Velocity
6PPC             	60 gr        	BL-C(2)	31.5  	3041 ft/s
6x47 mm          	60 gr        	BL-C(2)	30.5  	3233 ft/s
6x45 mm (6mmx223)	60 gr        	BL-C(2)	30.0  	3156 ft/s
Arthurrh 00:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Efficiency 

message: The prevous author states that a group size of .200 is not possible. Actually the record to date is .009 at 100 yards with a .243 dia bullet. How is this possible? The measuring of groups is measured from center to center on the two widest impacts on the target. The distance between the two centers is the group size. So if you were to fire two shots and the second shot impacts .250" away from the first shot, Then the group size for this two shot group is .250.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.71.94.240 (talk) 16:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that is not what was stated. It says that having a HOLE from the group smaller than the diameter of a bullet is impossible. It actually explains that .200 group size is the accurate statement, but .200 hole size is not. You must have misread it. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 06:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper measurement of groups 

message: The introduction says "This cartridge's [...] being only 1.23 inches (31 mm) long", but that doesn't correspond to any measurement in the Specifications. Which is wrong? Doub (talk) 23:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length
Talk:Biocatalyst

message: I changed the redirect to Biocatalysis, I think that article is much more "on topic" of Biocatalyst than the previous Catalysis redirect. -- dockingmantalk 21:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the redirect to the Enzyme article, because, so far as I know are these two synonyms. Kasper90 (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Epithelial sodium channel

message: ENaC structure picture is old. Can anyone change it on ASIC structure?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.111.83.76 (talk) 17:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: Hey all. I added two paragraphs linking ENaC to cystic fibrosis. I obtained the information from Robbins Pathology, 7th edition, page 490 - 491. If someone could be bothered, they could put the citation up! M0rt (talk) 04:45, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cystic Fibrosis 

message: This article seems to be about the same thing as Amiloride-sensitive sodium channel --PhiJ 21:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so, too. I will try to merge the artices tomorrow. Any preference which headword should be used? --NEUROtiker 00:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I don't really know anything about the subject, so which would be best I have no clue about. --PhiJ 13:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Their are many different types of sodium channels in the body. The Amiloride-sensitive sodium channel and Epithelial sodium channel are just two types.  They shouldn't be merged.  It would be like merging the articles for Toyota Camry and Corolla.  They kinda look the same and do the same thing, but they are not the same. D-rew 23:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Epithelial sodium channel article though, it is just another name for the same thing.  Also if you google it, you find that there are definitely amiloride sensitive peithelial sodium channel, so if they are not the same there is obviously something to be said about it.  Do you think you could do this please, as you obviously have some knowlage about this. --PhiJ 16:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, sorry, but i was incorrect before.   I had always thought amiloride-sensitive Na+ and epithelial Na+ channels to be different, but they are evidently just shorthand for Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channels.  Even going to the external link under either page you can see the longer term.  Sorry for the confusion, but now i vote for merger.  D-rew 23:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger
Talk:Judeophobia

message: On the contrary, I know a good many people who prefer the term "Judeophobia" to "Antisemitism" to get around some of the problems of usage that come up with the latter term. It's far from common. A redirect does the job, I think, though a stub with teh redirect might be even better. 89.100.160.110 22:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagree with above
Talk:FASM

message: It’s not only a fasm message board, it’s a site about assembly in general. A wonderful site, but… I doubt it should be mentioned in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.21.43.222 (talk) 16:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it too. WASM is dedicated to all sorts of assembler and low level programming, nothing special about FASM.Stiver (v.2) 11:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should wasm.ru be in the links?
Talk:Ottoman court

message: This article is totally crap. A knowledgeable person must rewrite it...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.103.36.14 (talk) 21:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. It makes tons of uncited and inaccurate generalized statements about the Ottoman court with no representation of how it changed over time. And most of what it says is, in any case, wrong. Chamboz (talk) 01:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally crap
Talk:List of Bosses in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess

message: This page has to go and the information be put in Characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess like it's done for every other game. I'm going to go find out how to tag for deletion and be right back.
Alright, I added it. Not only is all of this information already in the above link, but it's all gameFAQ style stuff. SixteenBitJorge 21:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Van Vandegrift

message: Issues:
:IMDB has one credit, as an "executive integration producer" on a short-lived TV show. I have no idea what the title means, since a google search seems to find no one else in the history of film has ever received such a credit. He's not mentioned anywhere in the credits for Kings of South Beach ().
:No idea what value the matrixx link is supposed to have, besides one of the most annoying flash animations I've ever seen. After finally getting past that, I didn't see anything relevant offhand. Maybe you can post a link to a particular page? 
:Being related to someone is pretty irrelevant, especially if the relationship is unstated (third cousin twice-removed?). Fan-1967 21:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated matrixx link shows him as a company executive, nothing really relevant to the article. Fan-1967 21:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've fixed all the issues as stated by expanding on the article in more detail.  The IMDB credit issues are now fixed, as well as the matrixx relevancy.  Santacruzsurf 18:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed Issues 
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 378

message: I have contacted the copyright owners of the vintage maps "R R Donnelley & Sons Company" I was given a reply from the Vice President, Associate General Counsel that I have their permission to use these maps for Wikipedia purposes. Now how do I go about putting that on the page for the map? Route 82 21:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: you removed the primary sources tag, why? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary sources
Talk:Barbara New

message: I think she was born in the 1920's. If her husband, Michael Barrington was born in 1925, then Barbara New maybe born in the same year, or a little bit earlier or later.
Nobody knows the actual year? I make a very big search in the Google, but I cant find anything. Maybe someone else have a bigger luck, or know how to search it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.226.234.183 (talk) 11:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully an official obituary will be released before too long and will include this information. Crisso (talk) 16:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Over two months after her death and still nothing. I can't believe she's considered so obscure as not to warrant an obituary in the press. For those wanting to know her birth details, I looked up Barbara New on the birth index, and the only birth of a Barbara H. New between 1920 and 1930 was registered in 1923 in Hammersmith. Crisso (talk) 21:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Labour battalions (Turkey)

message: What is a labor battalion? What was its functions.. Is it same as other labour battalions during WWI? I saw an edit which deleted the information that explains the concept! Is it possible could someone answer why this info is removed? Also if labor battalions are not part of Armenian genocide why it is in the template? Thanks!.OttomanReference 02:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help please 

message: There are Armenians in the ottoman army at the age of "sixty???" The life expectancy of Anatolian people was 42 in 1937 (the first census was 27 then 37). God knows what was in 1915. Not sixty, not even 42. I do not know where the story is originated but the citation seems to be not reliable. Is there a better source? --OttomanReference 05:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article says "some as old as sixty"
Talk:Earl of Mansfield

message: I'm assuming the Scottish titles have a standard remainder but I can't clarify atm. I have split the two lordships which should really have their own article but who was the first holder of the 1641 title. Alci12 22:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Why isn't the Master of Stormont listed as "Lord Scone"? —Tamfang (talk) 23:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The heir-apparent to a viscountcy (as such) never gets a courtesy peerage, nor does the second heir-apparent to an earldom. —Tamfang (talk) 22:12, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  second heir apparent 

message: I would not list "Master of Stormont" as a subsidiary title, because the Earl does not hold it.  The title Master of X belongs to the heir (apparent or presumptive) to the title Lord X (edit 2023: or Lord Blank of X).  Calling it a subsidiary title of the earldom is like saying Duke of Rothesay is a subsidiary title of the monarch. —Tamfang (talk) 01:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: that is a very good point. On a related topic, perhaps the titles Lord Scone and Lord Balvaird should be added as subsidiary titles, if you feel that would be suitable. Those two titles were held by successive Viscounts Stormont from the fourth Viscount Stormont onward; later, David Murray, 7th Viscount Stormont (1727–1796) succeeded as Earl of Mansfield in 1793. — Blairall (talk) 18:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, done.  I did not link Lord Scone because that redirects to Stormont. —Tamfang (talk) 03:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Master of Stormont 

message: The present earl is listed as "9th and 8th".  Is that how he is described in authoritative sources?  As he is 8th of the senior creation and 9th of the junior, one might expect "8th and 9th". —Tamfang (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  sequence of sequences
Talk:Zaretan

message: ==Untitled==
If they're the same cities, they should be in the same article.
--Alekjds 22:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged.  --Sigma 7 12:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: If they're the same cities, they should be in the same article.
--Alekjds 22:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged.  --Sigma 7 12:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Geek Pride Festival

message: Insider sources told me that there was some post-event drama between McEachern and Kaup. I can't find any suitable references about this, so it is pure OR of the worst kind till then. 
Tim McEachern also hosted a geek-oriented radio show on WAMC Albany called Geek Nation. He has since co-written a book called The New New Economy (). These details would more properly go on a Tim McEachern article, were he deemed notable enough to warrant one. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 22:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I’m muhammed and I’m 31 years old. I’m actor and model. Muhammed dervish (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I’m muhammed dervish
Talk:Paperhouse (film)

message: In the Infobox for "Writer," should Catherine Storr's name be added alongside that of Matthew Jacobs, since the movie is merely an adaptation of her novel?  It seems unfair to just attribute it to him.  
Also, I own this on VHS, but mine has a different cover design than the poster shown here and at All Movie Guide.  I'm guessing mine is the U.S. version, but I don't have it handy.  Chris77xyz 04:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writer/ cover art
Talk:Susan Cullen-Ward

message: What surname should she have held upon her marriage? This should be in the article. It is strange that the Australian government would issue her a passport in her maiden surname, though cite a.k.a. Queen Susan; did she keep her maiden name? These and other questions remain unanswered and underdeveloped in this article.Mowens35 22:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When she died she was referred to in official press releases as HM Queen Susan I Zog.  That may be of help.--Couter-revolutionary 16:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Official press releases" - official in what sense? Who were they released by? By any chance was it by her own family / retainers / Albanian royalists? If so that is of no help whatsoever. Saddam Hussein identified himself as "President of the Republic of Iraq" when he crawled out of a foxhole under gunpoint ... you would call him President anymore though. Self-proclaimed titles aren't necessarily generally accepted. In fact they generally aren't. --SandyDancer 16:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The press release was written by the former royal family's secretariat. Don't get your knickers into a twist. Her titles are given credit (and discredit) in the article. Let's move on.Mowens35 16:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite, I was just about to say this. The point is she was known as Zog, this was her surname.  Her family are best placed to know this, I do believe.  If, SandyDancer, you had read the discussion you would know it wasn't about her titles.--Couter-revolutionary 16:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mea Culpa --SandyDancer 16:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite alright.--Couter-revolutionary 16:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Please do not be so rude. I am thinking like an editor and you should have good faith.  I shall get the page number for you presently. --Couter-revolutionary 00:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

text: For you to say this implies your PoV that you think he should not have been proclaimed as such. When they did it, they did not do it with the mistaken belief he could enter Albania and rule, it was a formality a lot of Royals in exile go through.  That is not to say I don't believe he is entitled to be King, but we shan't get into that.  As opposed ot incorrect perhaps we could say "ceremonially" &c.--Couter-revolutionary 00:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RC servo

message: This is a great article and all, but I'm wondering what kind of VOLTAGE is applied to the servo motor...  Is it +5 volts and ground?  Is it +5 volts and -5 volts?  Something else?  Thanks.
: Connect the black wire to ground and the red to a 4.8-6V source : ). --WerdnanoslenTalk 01:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of mayors of the City of Brussels

message: Between 1977 and 1982, Brussels had two mayors? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Largoplazo  (talk • contribs) 
:The initial stub by User:62.4.161.174, 4 years ago, was full of date errors, I've just corrected them, and created a Hervé Brouhon stub and a Michel Demaret article, plus a succession box. --Pylambert (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The title of the article is formally speaking incorrect. Brussels like all Belgian municipal governments is headed by a Burgomaster, not a Mayor. Usage (no doubt inspired by laziness and ignorance) favours mayor, however an encyclopaedic resource should respect the difference and use the term Burgomaster. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 23:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: A case of WP:COMMONNAME perhaps? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:57, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burgomaster
Talk:The Mumbly Cartoon Show

message: it would be nice, to link some episodes, p.e.
* 14 Episodes of The Mumbly Cartoon Show  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.16.68 (talk) 11:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  episodes link
Talk:The Golden Egg

message: What is the significance of the eponymous golden egg? Danceswithzerglings (talk) 00:41, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's part of a recurring nightmare of Saskia: she was dreaming she floated around the universe in a golden egg and couldn't escape unless she'd come across a second golden egg, which is very improbable in the vastness of space (from Dutch Wikipedia). Why it's an egg and why it's golden, I don't know. Mtcv (talk) 18:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Egg

message: Why is the title of this article The Golden Egg rather than The Vanishing? Mtcv (talk) 18:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Extatosoma tiaratum

message: The sentence "Although today they are known primarily in Australia, captive stocks were originally kept in Queensland" doesn't make much sense, since Queensland is a part of Australia.  Anybody know what this was meant to say? Pinball22 03:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Illogical bit...

message: Not sure how to officially changed it, but I was surprised. There was no mention about the females becoming fully green and more distinguishable from the males wen adult 2A02:C7E:4D9A:600:E4E3:F5AB:A526:3B01 (talk) 22:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The changes in female leaf insect as they become adults
Talk:Mike Conway

message: This is a terrible article. Can we please get an expert on the subject involved? 80.189.181.187 22:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled