Talk:KMFDM discography

message: Okay, I've started the KMFDM discography article and have included all the studio albums, compilations, and live albums.  If no one beats me to it, I'll expand the sections on singles, videos, soundtracks, and remixes.  I've based the template on the Nine Inch Nails discography, which includes chart information (US and UK) and sales figures.  However, I don't know this info for the KMFDM releases.  Since only a few KMFDM albums/singles have charted, perhaps including this in the template is not necessary?  Also, I'm not sure about the relationship between KMFDM Records and Metropolis Records, so I don't know if certain releases should be credited to one or the other, or both.  Someone with more knowledge in this area may want to clarify.  As always, thoughts and opinions are most welcome.  --buck 16:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work! I definitely think this is the right place for all this expanded information. I also think that now that we have a place to put all this info, we should revert the discography on the main page back to the simple format it was before someone added tables (i.e. just the simple list of albums and a list of singles/EPs, without the extended lists of remixes and video game soundtracks, videos, etc.). Again, kudos... keep up the good work.– 63.107.220.191 19:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, things seem to be coming along nicely.  Thanks for the improvements, and of course for migrating the sinlges/EPs/videos. --buck 18:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New article

message: I believe we should change the way the groups are organized, and combine EPs and Remix albums into a single group, while leaving Singles as a separate group.  The reason is because the divisions between some releases, and whether they are EPs or Remix albums, can be extremely hazy at time.  Ruck Zuck, in particular, clearly straddles that line, as it contains a number of new tracks in addition to its many remixes.  Better to combine them, rather than trying to figure out which is which.206.180.38.20 (talk) 21:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is one option that I think could clean things up a bit as far as arguments over albums vs. EPs vs remix albums vs Side projects vs KMFDM.  I hope that makes sense.  This change would basically get rid of EPs as a category completely, thus, each group would be just one type of item.206.180.38.20 (talk) 00:32, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is a good idea. No debates over whether the "vs" releases are side projects or not, and no debates over what's an EP or not. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 05:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The new layout looks good.  Nice job.  Should the Naïve/The Days of Swine & Roses single be moved to the versus section?  I don't recall whether or not it was credited as a "Vs." project. --buck (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's a split single (each band only remixed each others track, there was no collaboration), and it was never credited as "KMFDM vs TKK". I agree, the new layout looks better. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization 

message: *List of singles here...
::I think this is a good idea. No debates over whether the "vs" releases are side projects or not, and no debates over what's an EP or not. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 05:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The new layout looks good.  Nice job.  Should the Naïve/The Days of Swine & Roses single be moved to the versus section?  I don't recall whether or not it was credited as a "Vs." project. --buck (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's a split single (each band only remixed each others track, there was no collaboration), and it was never credited as "KMFDM vs TKK". I agree, the new layout looks better. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles

message: We have a section for KMFDM compilations, but what about compilation albums they contributed to?  That Madonna cover made me think of it.  It was part of that Virgin Voices album.  And there was also the Shut Up Kitty album from like 1992.  Should we add another section for that type of thing?  I don't see a cover songs section either, although those examples overlap.206.180.38.20 (talk) 00:56, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On a related note, should the links in the soundtracks sections point to the movies, or the sountracks themselves?  I would've thought the soundtracks, but I'll wait for another opinion before messing with it. 206.180.38.20 (talk) 21:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A "Compilations" section sounds like a good idea. A "Covers" section sounds like it would unnecessarily take up space (any covers are already mentioned on their respective album/single pages, and I haven't seen many Wikipedia pages with a "covers" section). As for the soundtracks part, I'd say it should point to the soundtrack itself. However, in a lot of cases the soundtrack is included in the movie article, so a link to the soundtrack section for those pages would be appropriate. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 01:29, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compilations - other 

message: I understand that Würst means sausage, and it's shown that way on the KMFDM home page where it says Würst Shit, but on both Amazon and Metropolis show the title without the umlaut.  I haven't seen it shown anywhere else as Würst when referring to the title of the album specifically.  I'm open to discussion on it though. <B>—Torchiest</B> talk/contribs 01:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The store shows an umlaut: . Since this is in German (well, presumably), and the MOS for music says we should keep the original spelling in its original language: , I'd suggest keeping the umlaut. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 06:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh.  That's really strange.  I wonder how there could be different images of the album cover with and without the umlaut.  You'd think they'd all be the same.  But okay, I'd rather go with the German spelling. <B>—Torchiest</B> talk/contribs 13:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wurst vs Würst 

message: From discussion on talk:Godlike (song), if Godlike 2010 is a single, then shouldn't it be linked to from Day Of Light and put in as the Next Single?  If not, then should Godlike 2010 go under Remix Albums? It is sort of a remix album (just 1 song instead of many).  Then this makes me think of Light. Light was a single in the traditional sense (promotional for track off of new album).  Godlike 2010 sort of floats between single and remix,  but if it is a Single    shouldn't we see it after Day of Light? Incredibly Obese Black Man (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tough call.  I would be okay with listing as a single after DoL, and just linking it back to the regular Godlike article.  I don't think there's anything wrong with that.  We have a couple other items on the list that are multiple singles linking to the same article.  Oh, and we did something similar with Naïve. <B>—Torchiest</B> talk/contribs 01:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Godlike 2010 

message: On American Tragedy Redux, they remixed the Hollywood Undead "Been to Hell". And also I've noticed the band has made music videos, but why aren't they on this page? I don't know many but I know there are some out there, even on their official YouTube page. - SilentDan297 20:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request - 10th June 2013