lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Princess Romanework

message: Based on material currently at Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia, there apparently is some question about Haile Selassie's biological relationship to Romanework. Citations & sources are needed. -- llywrch 18:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sendeq, I am not questioning your accuracy; I've found that you are correct many times before. The problem is one of sources. We could have someone claiming to be the "foremost expoert" on Ethiopia add a mountain of misinformation without providing citations & sources, & insist that it's not necessary because "everyone knows its true" -- which will only put the rest of us under the pressure of a deadline to work on uncovering the citations & sources that we should have added in the first place to disprove his lies & fantasies. If you say she is widely known to be his illegitimate daughter, then it should be easy to prove at least a link at the bottom for further research. -- llywrch 23:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I never said that H.I.H. was an illegitimate daughter.  That is exactly my arguement.  She is a legitimate daughter and is listed as such in the Almanach de Bruxelles not to mention the official family tree of the Ethiopian Imperial Family published in 1930.  I have stated this repeatedly.  I don't think one can find more reputable sources than those two.  User:Sendeq
The reason this is uncertain is because in all contemporary documents including those by the Emperor himself, whenever he listed his marriages and biological children, he never listed her, nor did he ever list any marriage aside from that to Empress Menen.  All of the allegations that he had another marriage, or biological children with someone else come from subsequently published voices. It is possible that she could have been an adopted by the Imperial couple but questionable and unconvincing that she is his biological child since the sources at the time including his own writings don't mention another wife or biological child from another woman beside Empress Menen. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 13:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kit Carson Peak

message: OK, I think I finally fixed the vandalism that was only partially fixed by AntiVandalBot. While I was at it I clarified (I hope) the new caption. However this page really needs a complete overhaul, including references, links, etc., which I intend to get to soon. -- Spireguy 03:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed vandalism; more to do 

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* According to Google Maps, the coordinates on this page actually point to Humboldt Peak, and Kit Carson is at 37.979725, -105.602517
 17:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Crestone Peak

message: I deleted the elevations attached to other peaks, as they aren't crucial to this article and are easily found by following the link. This follows standard Wikipedia practice, AFAIK. -- Spireguy 02:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevations 

message: I'm wondering why the summitpost.org link was removed. Summitpost is a mostly noncommerical site with a great deal of valuable information, including many pictures. I would say the link is quite useful, and it's not like there were very many external links (if having too many external links was the concern). -- Spireguy 02:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed summitpost.org link? 
Talk:Deep reactive-ion etching

message: What is the difference between RIE and DRIE? Is it possible the aspect ratio (AR). Eg. AR<2 is RIE, while AR>2 is DRIE?
The DRIE descibed here is the pulsed DRIE, switching between etching and passivating. It does also exist a continuous DRIE, the cryogenic DRIE with a SF6+O2 mixture at cryogenic temperatures.
Best regards
Preben Storas
Preben.Storas@sintef.no
----
The gas SF6 by itself is actually not highly reactive.  Quite the contrary.
Peter Lund/82.143.195.87 06:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I am fairly certain that the term "Bosch Process" refers specifically to silicon etching (i.e. SF6/C4F8), rather than the more general idea of switching chemistries.  Other switched chemistry processes (like the O2/C4F8 for polymers mentioned in the article now) are typically referred to as "Bosch-inspired" or something like that.  The reason for this is simply that the process was originally developed for silicon etching.  If anybody has any thoughts on this, I'd be glad to hear.  I think that the Bosch Process (which currently redirects here) has enough historical value to warrant its own page... I am working on putting something together now.  If anybody would like to help, let me know.  Lone Skeptic (talk) 03:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bosch Process
Talk:Firouz Nosrat-ed-Dowleh III

message: Seriously though, unless people enter "Prince Firouz Mirza Nosrat-ed-Dowleh Farman Farmaian III" in the seach they'll miss this page.  If there's a short-hand version that's also used (Prince Farmaian?) then those pages should be created with redirects to this article with the full name.  Also, I am moving this article to "Firouz Mirza Nosrat-ed-Dowleh Farman Farmaian III" (no "Prince") to keep it in line with other previous naming conventions regarding royalty (for examples, see Queen Victoria, Reza Shah Pahlavi, etc]]).  Bobak 18:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest article title?
Talk:Shear strength

message: While this is a decent start towards describing shear stress, it is ambiguous at best.  I don't have the time to edit this page personally, but if someone else does decide to pick up the cause, I would make 2 recommendations that would clarify a great deal.
# create a picture describing the forces and labeling the planes they are in.  The formulas listed could easily be mistaken for axial stress equations since the directions of the forces are not mentioned.
# Check out "Mechanics of Materials" by R.C. Hibbeler.  It's a great resource for this topic.  Section 1.5 is particularly pertinent. It was the textbook of choice when I got my  Mechanical Engineering degree back in 2004.
Good luck! 65.165.72.203 20:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I learned this formula for shear stress. The results are a little bit different.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.253.148.26 (talk) 07:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  tau = F * S / (I * t) 

message: This table's values don't match up with much of what I've seen elsewhere online, people generally report 0.5, 0.577, or 0.6 x UTS as the Shear Strength value. Also the link is deprecated so can't be reviewed. One sample mentioning 0.6 is https://www.portlandbolt.com/technical/faqs/calculating-strength/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.2.224.5 (talk) 03:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Approximate Strength Table 

message: I did a minor change by adding a sentenced saying of to measure shear strength.
I plan on adding an equation for average shear stress and moved it along with the other equations to a new section. I also want to improve the comparison section so I plan on removing the first table and replacing it with information from https://www.portlandbolt.com/technical/faqs/calculating-strength/.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NKrop (talk • contribs) 02:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average Shear Stress 

message: The diagram is confusing and possibly not correct. The diagram speaks of the force but does not show the force vector. It then goes on to show the shear denoted by tau with a direction, but shear is a pressure and not a force. Either the caption needs clarification or the diagram needs updating. 
MMmpds (talk) 20:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram Needing Improvement
Talk:Madison Hatters

message: I proposed deletion for this article, when I meant to propose a merge and redirect.  This team barely existed, it is doubtful it has any lingering following, and I move that this article (and the separate articles for each location where this franchise played) should be merged into the article for the current location of the franchise, the Great Lakes Loons.  --Muboshgu (talk) 02:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose a merge. Repeating some of the points I made in the AFD discussion: (a) It is not standard practice to consolidate articles on a minor league franchise that played in several cities into a single article. (b) There isn't a strong reason to do so, since there is generally very little continuity across locations--different owners, different players and managers, and quite often different affiliations. (c) A reason to keep separate articles for each city is that interest in minor league teams is generally associated with local history. I think it's more likely that an editor interested in Madison, Wisconsin history will expand this article than if its merged into the Great Lakes Loons, who play in a different state several hundred miles away. BRMo (talk) 04:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

text: I also oppose per BRMo. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 05:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Very late to the party but also oppose merge. -DJSasso (talk) 15:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Marshall, Dane County, Wisconsin

message: This section needs to be expanded.  I've started it with three of the best known businesses in the area, but more could be added. Timmccloud 21:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economy 

message: I've expanded the article with a significant amount of historical information.  Please review!  Timmccloud (talk) 21:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the review and edits.  I had to make some more changes, as a few of the edits mixed tenses and changed the information being passed to the reader.  Timmccloud (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your welcome. It looks better now. Good job! Royalbroil 18:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Truth/draft

message: This was intended to be a working draft which would be free of comment. I see now that the technology fails us in facilitating that task. Should I now just give up? Perhaps I can figure out a way to extract the actual meaning from your comments and I can put them into some literate encapsulation. :| -Ste|vertigo 06:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thing
Talk:Pioneer 11

message: Pioneer 11, launch date April 5 1973, insisted of April 6? -201.250.0.176, 19:06, 3 April 2006
:it was launched at 2 o'clock in the morning; it could have been reported as the 5th  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 19:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The probe was lost 13 years ago. Surely the infobox about it being a current spaceflight whose details may change should be removed? Thoughts? --Dbutler1986 (talk) 11:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current spaceflight? 

message: The section is entitled launch and trajectory, but says little about its trajectory. From a picture of Pioneer 11's path, it looks like it was launched directly on a Hohmann transfer orbit to Jupiter, but I haven't been able to confirm this besides from the map. Anyone know for sure if it was a Hohmann transfer orbit?
Cheerioswithmilk (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch and Trajectory 

message: The times and distances of the various encounters given in the text body differ from those in the tables. Especially bad is the "near-miss": the text gives the body as probably Epimetheus, but then gives the time and distance as Janus. The table is completely different from this information. This really should be corrected. CFLeon (talk) 18:31, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Information 
Talk:Huangshan City

message: I think we should move this page. I submit that there is not and never has been city named Huangshan. There is, however, a regional government called Huangshan, to wit, Huángshān Dìjí Shì, which is sometimes, confusingly, referred to in English as Huangshan City. However, it's inappropriate to have (city) in parentheses. I propose moving to Huangshan Shi. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 19:11, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. Prefecture-level city is also a city. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese). For an example, see Jilin City. --Neo-Jay 20:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested move
Category talk:Film

message: This category should better be merged with category filmS? ^_* ——Nutcracker胡桃夹子^.^tell me... 19:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope,  is for articles about individual films, while this category is about the film process, industry, history, etc. ♥ Her Pegship♥ 19:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm about to create . Any objections? ♥ Her Pegship♥ 19:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sub-cat?
Talk:Foyle Bridge

message: Could someone get a good picture of the bridge? -- Tough Little Ship 19:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found a bunch on the Geograph website. I've added the one I think looks the best, though if anyone disagrees, feel free to swap in any of the others I uploaded :) GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 17:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Pittsburgh Corporations

message: I removed Alcoa from this list, as it is no longer based in Pittsburgh. See this Post-Gazette article: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06058/661831-28.stm
Dan128 19:21, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The yellow header is way, way, way too bright.  Please find a less distracting color for this template.  --Laefer 20:51, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to #FFC920, which I grabbed from the Pittsburgh Steelers website, seemed fitting.  --Judzillah 21:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Everything on Yahoo! Finance, Forbes, and even Alcoa's website (request a grant or click the "contact" tab) *http://www.alcoa.com/global/en/general/contact_alcoa.asp
Let's the world know that some Brazilian dude's trophy wife's longing to live on Park Avenue doesn't make the headquarters move, good thing the CEO has a cable internet connection, after she gets mugged maybe she'll want to come back to the safest metro area in the world again.  In the mean time some rubber stamp letting the CEO have peace in the bedroom hasn't changed how the headquarters are documented for Alcoa.  
By the way nice change in the color, IMHO great choice!Marketdiamond 04:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcoa's HQ 

message: OK, I love Sheetz as much as the next person in Western PA, but they're based in Altoona, which is far enough away from Pittsburgh to be a separate market. (It's actually slightly closer to Harrisburg, if I'm right, or around halfway at least.) I recommend removing Sheetz from this template. Jgera5 06:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheetz 

message: Wabtec is now a Fortune 500 company and will be listed on the S&P as of tomorrow. 165.156.40.48 (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: can you provide a reliable source indicating this? Roadguy2 (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2019
Talk:Imperial province

message: The list includes provinces that didn't exist in AD 14, such as Upper and Lower Germany, which, based on their own articles, weren't separate provinces until AD 90. --130.58.235.187 19:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding Dacia as an Imperial Roman Province. "107 - Dacia, imperial proconsular province (split into Dacia Superior and Dacia Inferior between 118 – 158)".  For supporting information see: Roman province. Gaston200 (talk) 11:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "In 14 the following provinces were imperial provinces:"
Talk:55 Fiction

message: The article claims a couple of times that "the 55 fiction concept" is copyrighted.  However, concepts cannot be copyrighted, only particular expressions of those concepts can (see, in fact, Wikipedia's own article on copyright).
Possibly the actual impediment is that the term "55 fiction" itself is a trademark, or possibly (although it seems dubious) the claim has been advanced that any 55-word short story is a derivative work of the original ones, and thus protected under the copyrights to those stories.  This point should be researched further.
:I will definetely see if this is the case. Thanks for pointing out. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:McFarland, Wisconsin

message: Nick Wiess is now the boys swim team head coach
McFarland has actually won a football game this year.
3-6 record
The listing of poms as a school sport is quite debateable and should be reconsidered. Poms participates in largely halftime shows which would give marching band the status of a sport if consistent.
Poms is listed on the McFarland Site  as a girl's team, so a sport it will stay. Lordmontu 02:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Brad Fischer does indeed live here, but he is not the Brad Fischer you refer to in this information. 172.220.66.222 (talk) 13:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brad Fischer
Talk:Oregon, Wisconsin

message: Yeah, um. Oregon is a state, not a town. WHy can't the people of Wisconsin get it together?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.57.216 (talk) 10:05, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gotta say something

message: Unfortunately, the link that is present to the Oregon Historical Society (http://www.oregonareahistoricalsociety.org/documents/articles/village_name.htm) that refers to the history of the town's name contradicts the content of this article. The postscript on that page reads, "* Post Script
Florice Paulson's book says the railroad was involved in the naming of Oregon, but subsequent research has shown that not to be true.
Once the railroad was established here in 1865, that reinforced the name of Oregon.  However, in 1847, Rosell Babbit circulated a petition for a separate township organized under the name of Oregon.  This area was under the government of the Town of Rome.  On Feb. 11, 1847- an Act of the Territorial Legislature, approved a separate town called Oregon.  Oregon Township was created by the division of Rome Township, which included what would become the towns of Fitchburg, Oregon, Dunn and Rutland.  Local government was established and elections held.  Rueben Boyce as elected chairman. (MW)"http://www.oregonareahistoricalsociety.org/documents/articles/village_name.htm
I'm not sure what to do about this, since the citation is correct, and the data is contained within that page, it's just directly contradicted and therefore, seems inaccurate on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zam Ygam (talk • contribs) 15:27, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming History
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Dane County, Wisconsin

message: There is a photo of the Duncan house on this page, but I don’t know why. Is it within the Cooksville Historic District? If so, could someone please confirm it and then mention that in the caption? --Rob Kennedy 20:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duncan house 

message: The list is currently very large and cumbersome - how about splitting off the entries in Madison to National Register of Historic Places listings in Madison, Wisconsin? ∙ AJCham(talk) 14:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split off Madison? 

message: I'm surprised the Stamm House in Middleton isn't on the National Register of Historic Places. 142.254.84.185 (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middleton Stamm House & Pheasant Branch Creek
Talk:Compossibility

message: Let's get a citation for what works this word is used in. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There I cited it, guys. I don't have Leibniz in front of me, but Stanford Encyclopedia is a good secondary source. That should be helpful to anyone interested in learning more. Guinness4life (talk) 03:26, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References?
Talk:Springdale, Wisconsin

message: How come no mention that the town is the basis for the 2018 Hallmark movie Small Town Christmas set in a fictional Springdale, WI?
Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 09:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You can certainly be bold and add something yourself! -- Dolotta (talk) 16:12, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hallmark movie
Talk:Nixon in China

message: I sympathize with the instinct to correct names of historical figures to more widely used (and IME more intuitive) Pinyin system, eg Zhou Enlai rather than Chou Enlai. But in this case, the libretto uses Wade-Giles, probably because it was dominant in the historical sources. Should we stick with pinyin throughout, but use both in the list of characters? Or vice versa?  -- Preceding unsigned comment added by Conflatuman (talk  o  contribs) 22:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should use names and places in "Roles", "Synopsis" and below as they are written in the libretto. In "Historical background", current (pinyin) transliteration is fine. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be potentially confusing if the same name was given two renderings. AnonMoos (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we have to go with what Adams wrote when we are referring to the characters or to the scene of the opera. We should freely use parentheticals to deal with any potential confusion.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: AnonMoos: Who would be confused by Zhou Enlai/Chou Enlai, Mao Zedong/Mao Tse-tung? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:55, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I bet that the majority of Americans under 40 (at least) have little idea who Zhou Enlai was (he died in 1976, after all, and was not a major world leader and cultural icon in the same sense as Mao).  Therefore they might be confused if both "Zhou" and "Chou" appear in the article, with no explanation. AnonMoos (talk) 10:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Spelling Zhou Enlai's name consistently in this article will not improve his recognition among Americans under 40. The interested reader can find out more by clicking on one of his links in this article, no matter how it is spelled. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: However, if both "Zhou" and "Chou" appear in the article without any explanation or cross-referencing of the two names, then many who don't click on further links would be confused... AnonMoos (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have bitten the bullet and added pinyin alternatives in the roles section. Conflatuman (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinyin vs Wade-Giles
Talk:Denmark, Wisconsin

message: Steve's Cheese factory is not located in the Village. It is in Langes Corners, Wisconsin which is located in the Town of New Denmark, Wisconsin . The business in the village is a gift shop. Nyth63 11:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve's Cheese 
Talk:Rauma dialect

message: This should be moved to 'Rauma dialect' or something. It is not a separate language from Finnish. My account is too new for moving.--Zet 19:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It differs more from standard Finnish, than Swedish and Norwegian from each other. --Lalli 07:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Rather, it's like fast scanian to slow swedish.80.186.142.171 (talk) 08:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lingustically there is no such dialect than "Rauma". The dialect spoken in Rauma is Northern dialect (1a) of Sout-Western dialect group (:fi:Lounaismurteet)) in the larger Western Finnish dialect group  --SM (talk) 01:42, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?