lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Dev920

message: User:Dev920
run at Fri Jan 19 13:47:04 2007 GMT
Category talk: 6  
Category: 34  
Image talk: 6  
Image: 21  
Mainspace 1904  
Portal talk: 15  
Portal: 54  
Talk: 882  
Template talk: 11  
Template: 59  
User talk: 795  
User: 342  
Wikipedia talk: 418  
Wikipedia: 936  
avg edits per article 2.12  
earliest 22:46, 7 March 2006  
number of unique articles 2587  
total 5483  
2006/3  101   
2006/4  8   
2006/5  160   
2006/6  492   
2006/7  100   
2006/8  971   
2006/9  338   
2006/10  567   
2006/11  866   
2006/12  1125   
2007/1  755   
Edit count from http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=Dev920&site=en.wikipedia.org --BigDT 13:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Corrida (horse)

message: There should be a disambiguation page here - most people think of the corrida as the famous "Running of the Bulls", and not an obscure French racehorse.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.3.112.234 (talk) 09:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

message: The informations section of [pedigree] states that she was shot by a german soldier during battle. No information of where this piece of information comes from is given. 178.4.105.152 (talk) 03:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible whereabouts 
Talk:Maureen Gardner

message: It would surely have been difficult to return to England in 1978 if she had died in 1974! Someone needs to look again at this article. BONNUIT (talk) 10:03, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: I removed a huge amount of content that was completely unnecessary, irrelevant, and unencyclopedic. It sounded like it was written by the subject's mother. I left what was seemingly relevant but it still all needs sources to be verified. Churchgoer251 (talk) 05:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Joseph Milner (firefighter)

message: Guys, squabbling about his death. His death was mentioned in the parliament christmas announcements, 2007. I am his great grand nephew.
Please stop removing my flag questioning the notability of this person. That is a legitimate question to ask. There are no citations in the article to establish either the notability or the death of this person. I am entitled to add a notability flag to the article. Your persistent removal could be construed as vandalism. WWGB 14:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that. As it stands, this article meets the requirements for speedy deletion. If the flag gets removed again without any attempt to improve the article, I'll go ahead and add the appropriate deletion tag. Jay†Litman 14:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm not sure what article you are talking about. This article perhaps, which does an acceptable job of describing Jack Russel's importance in the history of dog breeding and therefore, supports notability. Thus far, all we've learned about Joseph Milner is that he was a firefighter and he died, which isn't quite enough.  Major awards, contributions to his field, recognition from peers, magazines, newspapers, etc. These are all examples of items that support notability. Of course, a list of important deeds/contributions will also require references. Hope this helps. Jay†Litman 16:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Pombaline style

message: Did this style have any influence in Portugal's colonies? Are there any examples in Brazil, Angola, Mozambique etc.? --Mcginnly | Natter 14:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting point. The Grove mentions the work of Landi at Belém, Brazil as being (perhaps) influenced by the Pombaline style. It seems a good bet Brazilian neoclassicism owes some sort of debt to Lisbon. Twospoonfuls 17:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Interesting article - but there aren't any sources. It looks like a private study rather than a wikipedia article. One point I am particularly interested in is whether the Pombal design is really all that seismically resistant. My feeling is that it is not. I will see if I can get anything on this. Muchado (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is detailed info about the anti-seismic features of Manuel de Maia's designs in Nicholas Shrady's book about Lisbon Earthquake: The Last Day:  Wrath, Ruin, and Reason in the Great Lisbon Earthquake of 1755, Nicholas Shrady, Penguin, 2008.  Mick gold (talk) 06:47, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: "The construction of new palaces is regulated and unostentatious designs rejected (a very unpopular situation among the aristocracy), allowing for decoration only in the portal."  Is this correct: unostentatious designs rejected?  "allowing for decoration only in the portal" would imply that ostentatious designs were rejected. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palaces
Talk:Energy liberalisation

message: This page is extremely biased against liberalisation and doesn't presnet an un-biased view of what liberalisation of energy/utility markets mean.
Mariospatrinos 14:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that some actions should be taken to minimise bias against liberalisation. However, the issue has decreased dramatically since the version looked at eight years ago and the sources don't entirely support such a line of thinking. All sources I consulted in rewriting the article took a negative look on the topic, saying that it wasted money and failed to generate returns which which would excuse the costs associated with the establishment of such markets and the starting costs necessary to accomplish such change. Ifly6 (talk) 07:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 
Talk:Deutscher Wetterdienst

message: I translated the German Wikipedia article on this topic. I'm not too familiar with the MediaWiki and neither am I a native speaker, so I'd appreciate, if someone could proofread my translation and change the templates and categories accordingly for a non-stub version. 212.202.36.152 14:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Charles Rees

message: at 08:33, on 12 March 2018‎ a user deleted the early life and education section of this article, leaving the rest of the page unchanged. This means that the career section begins rather weirdly, and the article feels incomplete. The user in question (ip 124.124.71.149) hasn't bothered to specify why, and frankly it just feels like vandalism to me. So, 124.124.71.149, any clarifications on your actions?
103.254.128.130 (talk) 10:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No response from 124.124.71.149, so I went ahead and undid the change. This page is related to the subject of today's Google Doodle, so there may be more traffic than usual. Sprocter (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question about a recent edit
Talk:Sango, The God-King

message: It appears Sango and Shango are the same deity in Yoruba mythology. Kghusker 14:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So it does; as the Shango article is more developed, I've redirected this one to it. -David Schaich Talk/Cont 22:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Request
Talk:Bliss Perry

message: The information in the Perry Bliss article seems all to be correct, except for his name.  The gentleman's name was Bliss Perry and not Perry Bliss.  The contents of the article should thus be merged with that of Bliss Perry and then this article should be eliminated.
:Done. PC78 01:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rancho San Pedro

message: Feb 21st, 2007....I would like to catagorize this article under California Ranchos, and add a picture of the original map from 200 years ago that is reflected in the California State University, Dominguez Hills web-site , historical archives section; Dominguez Rancho (maps) , http://archives.csudh.edu:2006/cdm4/RanchoSanPedro.php     just follow the link..I believe it's not a copyright violation and it will be of great importance to this article, can you please help? thanks, Dave DonDeigo 14:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have written a new version in the talk section, as advised, , citing references, and not infringed on any copyrights...please review and instate accordingly, thank you DonDeigo 16:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category request

message: Juan Jose Dominguez, a Spanish soldier, came to San Diego, California with the Gaspar de Portolà expedition, and later to San Juan Capistrano and San Gabriel, with Father Juniperro Serra. In 1784, Juan Jose was granted 75,000 acres of land from the Spanish Empire, signed by the Spanish King Carlos III, which was named Rancho San Pedro.
The original Spanish land grant included what today consists of the Pacific coast cities of Los Angeles harbor, San Pedro, the Palos Verdes peninsula, Torrance, Redondo Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Manhattan Beach, and east to the Los Angeles River including; the cities of Lomita, Gardena, Harbor City, Wilmington, Carson, and Compton.
In 1846, the Battle of Dominguez Rancho was fought on the rancho site during the Mexican-American war. 
The rancho land grant was validated by the Mexican government @ 48,000 acres in 1828, and a US land grant validating 25,000 acres was issued in 1858 by the state of California.
 
*these facts were retrieved from the State of California museum's sections, State of California's Spanish / Mexican land grants and the Rancho Dominguez web site. I feel this re-write does not infringe on any copyrites and is a basic version for the article. Please advise..DonDeigo 15:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rancho San Pedro re-write

message: Copyright violation deleted. Please see http://www.dominguezrancho.com/history/ for one account of the history of Rancho San Pedro and the Dominguez Rancho Adobe. BlankVerse 03:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minimum historical account that should be stated in this article
Talk:CLC bio

message: CLCbio was acquired by Qiagen in 2013  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.29.43.1 (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was created by someone in Denmark, probably affiliated with the company. Their claims of "independent" publications mentioning their products consisted of one press release and one commercial convention where they were a paying attendee. This article is commercial spam and should be deleted.
=== no deletion ===
This is not spam, and the accusations are false. Both Bio-IT World and GenomeWeb are truly independent media - you can't buy an article and the articles linked we're of no such nature. However you can advertise in these, like you can in Nature or Science, but that doesn't make them less credible, does it? I think someone in New Zealand should sign their claims and back them up with valid arguments! Don G.
=== Advertising and notability ===
I agree with the original complainant.  The advertising blurb needs to be replaced with a meaningful description of the company.  "High-performance computing" in and of itself tells us nothing.  "Garnering considerable positive attention" is pure weasel wordage.  Apart from the name of the company, where it is and what it does, there's nothing here for wikipedia.  and hence, I suggest Don G. (re-)reads the policies on advertising and notability before defending the article from deletion.  I would rather see energy spent on writing entries for Danish biotech and pharma companies like Neurosearch, LEO Pharma, Bavarian Nordic, Santaris and Symphogen (to name a few) than this pointlessness. Daen (talk) 12:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  request for deletion 

message: I agree with the original complainant.  The advertising blurb needs to be replaced with a meaningful description of the company.  "High-performance computing" in and of itself tells us nothing.  "Garnering considerable positive attention" is pure weasel wordage.  Apart from the name of the company, where it is and what it does, there's nothing here for wikipedia.  and hence, I suggest Don G. (re-)reads the policies on advertising and notability before defending the article from deletion.  I would rather see energy spent on writing entries for Danish biotech and pharma companies like Neurosearch, LEO Pharma, Bavarian Nordic, Santaris and Symphogen (to name a few) than this pointlessness. Daen (talk) 12:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising and notability
Category talk:American socialists

message: * American socialists is not a subset of American liberals.  This categorization is inappropriate, and I've moved it up, although I question the entire scheme. --lquilter 14:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Steinbeck never joined any socialist party and never said he was a socialist.  The Four Deuces (talk) 05:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:American people by political orientation

message: The way this category is being used in the subsections :Category:American liberals, at least, is not according to any political science methodology that I know of, or of self-definitions of the groups or individuals so categorized.  So, by what?  Apparently only by individual categorizer's points of view and opinions on the matter.  Please discuss at Wikipedia talk:Categorization of people#people by political belief. --lquilter 14:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of category

message: I see that :Category:American conservatives and :Category:American liberals used to exist but were deleted. This begs the question, if an American explicitly describes himself as a "conservative" (e.g., S. E. Cupp ) or "liberal" (e.g., Ed Schulz ), how do we categorize him? — Loadmaster (talk) 19:11, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no Conservatives and Liberals?
Talk:Rachel Foster Avery

message: Any relation to Stephen Foster?
:Yes, he is her second cousin once-removed; their common ancestor is an Alexander Foster (1710-1767), who is his great-grandfather and her great-great-grandfather. Probably not worth mentioning on the page unless there is evidence they knew each other. Alafarge (talk) 18:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Related?

message: Moving discussion from my talkpage to article talkpage so that other editors who have watchlisted the article are aware of this content discussion and can choose to comment if they wish. cc: . --Rosiestep (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied and pasted text
Talk:The Oxford Murders (film)

message: Is Podorov inspired in Grigori Perelman? --Error (talk) 23:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Podorov

message: When is the UK release?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onshore (talk • contribs) 23:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK 

message: Is it acceptable to be writing spoilers in the cast notes? For example "presumably token red herring" and "becomes the first victim". For all other films I have seen on Wikipedia they include a separate plot section, so if people do not wish to know the plot and thus have the film spoiled they can stick to the rest of the article. Also, I would have thought the word 'presumably' is a no-go on Wikipedia which is supposed to support factual information. Machento (talk) 12:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers/Guesswork in the Cast Listing 

message: All that stuff about Wittgenstein at the beginning of this film is about as accuate as a WMD dossier. Not only did he not write the Tractatus under fire, as John Hurt's character alleges, he didn't ask questions like "Can we know the truth?" Furthermore, he didn't use mathematical logic in steps to show there is no truth outside of mathematics (in fact, there is little mathematical logic in the entire book, and what logic there is, is pretty basic). These things were of no interest at all to him.
Rosa Lichtenstein (talk) 20:47, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wittgenstein
Talk:Romie-0 and Julie-8

message: There is a typo in the article title: the name "Romie-0" should have a zero as the final character, however it is being presented here as a lower-case letter "o". As Julie-8 is correctly shown with a digit and the article itself consistently uses a zero, this error should be easy to fix by an admin. 70.73.90.119 (talk) 14:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Title correction needed
Category talk:Sagas

message: Why is there a separate category level here? What other sagas than Norse sagas are there? The word saga specifically refers to the Norse ones.--Barend 15:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course you're right. I had moved all the article and categories from :Category:Norse sagas to :Category:Sagas but I've been reverted withouth anybody telling me. I moved them back and proposed :Category:Norse sagas for deletion. Sigo 15:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

message: There seems to be a lot happening with this category right now, but to state the obvious: Icelanders' sagas are Norse sagas. Icelanders' sagas should be a subcategory under Norse sagas. --Barend 16:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icelanders' sagas are norse sagas
Talk:Simone Waisbard

message: I found a grave of a Simone Waisbard (maiden name Goguelat) - https://billiongraves.com/grave/Simone-Goguelat-Waisbard/40353613.
I looked on deces.matchid.io and the birthday almost matches - 31 August rather than the 30th - https://deces.matchid.io/search?q=goguelat+simone. Is it normal for the death record on that site to show a woman's maiden name rather than her married name?
Skycloud86 (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: May have died in 2013
Talk:Sandra Gasser

message: I changed the preposition used for the race distances, according to the following standard practice:
"She won the gold medal at 800m last year."
"In the 800m at the World Championships she won gold."
"in" applies to a specific event, shorthand for "in the 800m race".
"at" applies to the distance as a whole, shorthand for "at the distance of 800m".
ByteofKnowledge 15:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In/At
Talk:Hard copy

message: The use of the term "hard copy" in the statement below is not industry-standard, and so I think that the statement should not be included in the article.
In semiconductor electronics, an ASIC hard copy can be made of an FPGA.
Altera uses the registered trademark HardCopy to refer to its structured ASICs, as one can read through the article's HardCopy external link.  The article's description of the technique needs to be verified for accuracy.
The paragraphs about Altera HardCopy and Xilinx EasyPath are copied substantially from the article Application-specific integrated circuit.  Merely mentioning the Altera product and referencing the proper section of the source article might be better.
KerryVeenstra 15:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:.li

message: What does the entry about Long Island mean? Where is it used? If no references are added I was thinking to remove the note. Matteo 16:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Island 
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Liechtenstein

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
Talk:Tactical Divers Group

message: "top niche combat swimmers and divers": I think this should be "top notch", but possibly it's a technical/ military term, so I won't make the change now.  FWIW, there are about a thousand times more Google hits for "top notch" than for "top niche", which could be interpreted as meaning the latter is an error for the former. Mcswell (talk) 18:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  niche --> notch?
Talk:Progressive Citizens' Party

message: At the bottom of the page, following the format of many  such pages on Wikipedia, is a list of political parties in Liechtenstein. I did not see that and so added an internal link to another Wikipedia article on the Patriotic Union.  I then saw the list and un-did my edit.  This leads me to wonder if the format of the list at the bottom of the page should be changed to make the list more noticeable.  I know that when I visit Wikipedia I pay attention to the internal and external links but not to the finer print along the bottom.  Maybe the format of such lists should be changed so that they are more noticeable and more like the "See Also" links. --Bruce Hall (talk) 02:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List of political parties
Talk:Patriotic Union (Liechtenstein)

message: The correct translation of "Vaterländische" is "Patriotic", not "Fatherland", as it's an adjective not a noun. "Patriotic Union" is also the WP:COMMONNAME - see Google books (1,080 hits for Patriotic and 668 for Fatherland). Number 57 11:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It has to be the most understanding translation, not precise. --TheHeroWolf (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: "Patriotic" is more understandable than "Fatherland". Plus see WP:COMMONNAME. Please start a WP:RM if you wish to move the page, rather than continue moving it. Thanks, Number 57 15:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Do you have a source, that people more use "patriotic union" than "Fatherland Union"? The term "patriotic" comes from latin term "patria" which means "Fatherland". One who does not know latin, does not understand this. While "Fatherland" is understood by everyone. And I remember, that the article's name was already some years ago also "Fatherland Front" or so. "Patriotic" has an own german word ("patriotisch"), so the more correct and more understandable translation of "Vaterländisch" would be "Fatherland('s)", also for the political party. --TheHeroWolf (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Number 57 is correct, Patriotic Union is the common name used by English language sources about the party, and is a widely understandable translation of the German word Vaterländisch.--Autospark (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure? --TheHeroWolf (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've given you the sources above in my first comment – Google books. Number 57 20:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've asked the other one, but your sources only prove that there is a big magnitudity for both "Patriotic" and "Fatherland" (and you didn't show results for "Fatherland's"). But I want precise sources. --TheHeroWolf (talk) 20:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There was one hit for "Fatherland's". Number 57 07:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: But not zero. As we see, all three terms are used, while "Patriotic" and "Fatherland" have big magnitudities. For a more correct translation, the article's name should be changed back to "Fatherland Front". --TheHeroWolf (talk) 11:03, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No it shouldn't. "Fatherland" is the translation of "Vaterland" not "Vaterländisch"; the only word that means the same thing as "Vaterländisch" in English is "Patriotic". Number 57 11:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, as a native English speaker. Besides, there is the issue of WP:COMMONNAME.--Autospark (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Alexander S. Onassis Foundation

message: "The foundation's funds ultimately derive from fossil fuels, as the Onassis fleet remains one of the world's largest transporters of oil and petroleum."
So what? I know Wikipedia is far left. Is this supposed to make us all hate the foundation or something? Seems completely irrelevant to the article. Just some random statement thrown in unconnected to the rest of the article.  2600:1700:BC01:9B0:544F:E012:2320:EFE4 (talk) 20:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  relevance?
Talk:Prince of Liechtenstein Foundation

message: The last few sentences of the first paragraph seem partisan.Ncox (talk) 21:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

message: Is it known what member of the family owns what share? --95.24.70.129 (talk) 02:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakdown