lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Skelton, Cumbria

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 09:23, 08 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Skelwith Bridge

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Skirwith

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 09:21, 08 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Storth

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 

message: This no longer exists (despite this) - see here and  at the Diocesan site. I think it's been converted to housing. Next time I'm in the village with camera will try for a shot of the current church, or central junction with war memorial, or post office/community shop. The signpost seemed the best pic available on Commons at present. PamD 13:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up. I should've labelled it as "former", and I see that you've already replaced the image, so thanks for that, too. There's quite a few other images on Geograph here and here, which may be transferred. I've also transferred Storth village shop and post office (geograph 3481930).jpg if you'd like to use it, temporarily. Regards, EP111 (talk) 14:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks - I like the PO pic but the signpost has grown on me, I think it's perhaps more distinctive. I've tweaked the geog location box- it seems that NSEW is a useful shortcut but lacks two useful options which can make the box more compact and more likely to fit sensibly on a small page (|nocion=yes and |width=auto), which seem to work well here. Not sure whether that box counts as a navbox or not... but seems to fit in Geography OK on reconsideration. PamD 14:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problems. I like to put that navbox in the Geography section, myself, too. It seems to be a much more appropriate placement. Although, WP:LAYOUTEL suggests the  template should be left until last. Make of that what you will? Regards, EP111 (talk) 14:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIssion Church of All Saints
Talk:Stubb Place

message: The Ordnance Survey spell it as Stubb Place. Saga City (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: Stubb Place is a farm, not a settlement. The link on the main page is of no use or credibility. This page should be deleted as the information is incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakes101 (talk • contribs) 10:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies
Talk:Swarthmoor

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Tallentire

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 09:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Temple Sowerby

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 
Talk:Threlkeld

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Thursby

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Thwaites, Cumbria

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Torver

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 09:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Troutbeck, Lakes

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 09:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Ulpha

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Underbarrow

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Unthank, Skelton

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Armathwaite Castle

message: Some editors would like to change the shortened footnotes in this article so that they use the template . (Please see the documentation at the template to see what this would be like.) If anyone objects, the article will stay as it is. What style should this article use? Why or why not? Please comment. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 19:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Picking up Trappist's comments above, there's also the proposal to use simple inline citations. Given that there's not much more literature on this castle, and the article's not going to get much bigger, I'm fairly neutral; Trappist's put forward a logical reason for inline citations, so I'd probably support that option. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change in citation style
Talk:Urswick

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Waberthwaite

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 

message: The introductory paragraph needs rewriting:-
Waberthwaite is a civil parish on the estuary of the River Esk in Cumbria, England. It was historically located near to and overlooking Muncaster Castle and the picturesque village of Ravenglass. Millom Palladium is the local arts facility in the nearby town of Millom, run by Millom Amateur Operatic Society. It is well known for its Cumberland sausages.
*It was historically located: Isn't it still located in exactly the same place?
*Millom Palladium is the local arts facility in the nearby town of Millom: Whilst relevant to Millom, this has no relevance to Waberthwaite
*It is well known for its Cumberland sausages: What is? It reads that Millom Palladium is well known for its bangers!
Skinsmoke (talk) 03:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Warcop

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:24, 06 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Waverton, Cumbria

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Westward, Cumbria

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Wetheral

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 

message: "Along with nearby Scotby and the merged village of Warwick Bridge - Corby Hill - Little Corby, this is one of the most affluent areas of North Cumbria."
Weatherall sure, Scotby sure. But no, no and no. Warwick bridge and Little corby are primarily council and low cost housing. are I'm going to remove them as it's blatently the subjective view of whoever put it there, one which I disagree with.If5tatement (talk) 02:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by User If5tatement
Talk:Julbernardia paniculata

message: I have looked up some reference titles for the information used in the article. I think that there should be enough support now to remove the citations box, which I shall do next--AssegaiAli 13:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Wythop

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 16:58, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:More with Less

message: HBO has some screenshots from this episode up on their site already:
#http://www.hbo.com/thewire/about/ the 1st image of Clark Johnson as Gus Haynes. The file path used on the page lists at as being from ep 51.
#The third image on the same page of Lance Reddick as Cedric Daniels is also stated as being from ep51 in its filepath.
#http://www.hbo.com/thewire/downloads/ the second image of Wendell Pierce as Bunk Moreland. The filepath again includes ep51.
I'm not sure we can warrant using these images for wikipedia when the articles are in such a stub state but they might well be suitable once it airs. I'd say the Gus Haynes one is most appropriate as it will be easy to remember and identify the episode from the image because it will be his first appearance and the article can include critical commentary on his importance to the show and joining the starring cast. This image is already used in The Wire (season 5) and is here for anyone interested. What do others think?
--Opark 77 (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential images

message: I've written a plot summary of appropriate length according to the TV episode guidleine. Please don't expand it unless absolutely necessary as it will be tagged with an avoidable warning.--Opark 77 (talk) 07:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: I've started a discussion about structuring the episode articles over on the main list as it will affect all of its sub-articles.--Opark 77 (talk) 17:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: no offence but why is the episode summaries so brief for the fifth season? im not saying i could do better but this is just lazy...where's the guy who did the last 4 seasons?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktonlai (talk • contribs) 03:34, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  no offence
Talk:Western ringtail possum

message: Western Ringtail Possum (Pseudocheirus occidentalis) is its own species, not a subspecies of the Common Ringtail Possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus). This is widely recognized and should not be very controversial. I just wanted to let the viewers know that I have changed this article, to reflect the current science understanding of the this species.
The Pharmacist (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And I'm reverting it. Latest according to whom? We follow Grovees in MSW3. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western Ringtail Possum (Pseudocheirus occidentalis) is its own species.
Talk:Boys (Summertime Love)

message: This needs clarification. Did the BBFC ban it or did some broadcasters just refuse to screen it ? 86.149.214.184 (talk) 13:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video "ban" in UK 
Talk:Albert William Stevens

message: The article says he was a captain, but the photograph shows a major's rank insignia. JHobson3 (talk) 15:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was Stevens' rank?
Talk:Debee Ashby

message: I have removed material from  that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.
IMDB is not a reliable source - and is a dead link anyway.--Scott Mac 09:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  material removed
Talk:Maksim Saburov

message: I've just about finished writing this. Any comments would be appreciated. --Palatinus Regni!!! 13:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dee Estuary

message: Though the article presently states that the Environment Agency is the Conservation Authority, I'd expect NRW to be the Conservation Authority for the Welsh half of the estuary. Plus, thought there might be a mention as one of those UK rivers which can boast a tidal bore- see https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-wales-60264801 for example. cheers Geopersona (talk) 08:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. All regulatory activities, including acting as the Navigation authority now rest with NRW. I also agree about the bore, although there are other rivers with bores including, bizarrely, the :River Arth (speaking as someone who has been caught out by it and got wetter than intended!)  Velella  Velella Talk   11:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation
File talk:UNPA voting chart.JPG

message: center|400px
System                                                     	Brazil	Indonesia	United States	India  	China
Schwartzberg's weighted voting                             	1.906%	1.383%   	9.065%       	5.960% 	7.672%
Provisional People's Assembly method                       	2.222%	1.709%*  	6.154%       	5.641% 	3.248%**
One man, one vote                                          	2.887%	3.754%   	4.611%       	16.758%	20.265%
Penrose method                                             	1.891%	2.157%   	2.390%       	4.557% 	5.011%
One state, one vote                                        	0.524%	0.524%   	0.524%       	0.524% 	0.524%
*Due to "Partially free" status. **Due to "Not free" status	      	         	             	       	
Table data comes from List of countries by population as of Dec. 2005. Sarsaparilla 13:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Apportionment of votes
Talk:Gleaston Castle

message: There is a 3D model of Gleaston Castle available on Sketchfab. Could this be added to an 'external links' section? For disclosure, I'm on the board of the Castle Studies Trust which sponsored the creation of the model. Richard Nevell (talk) 19:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds a good idea. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you be happy me doing it or should someone else? Richard Nevell (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm relaxed that there's consensus for the change. :) Hchc2009 (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Brilliant, I've now added it in. Richard Nevell (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: Hello, I've prepared a new draft of the article at User:Richard Nevell/sandbox. I've tried to make sure that everything is referenced. It does draw on the Castle Studies Trust's recent work, so as I'm a trustee for the charity I want to check if people are happy for me to update the article with what I've put in the sandbox. Richard Nevell (talk) 17:50, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New draft
Talk:Amirabad, Pakistan

message: malik khawaj mohamad tanoli numberdar of amirabad  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.128.20.190 (talk) 21:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  malik khawaj mohamad tanoli numberdar of amirabad 
Talk:Banphot Phisai district

message: Can somebody please explain to me these sentences from "History":
*"In 1910, the government moved the district office to the west bank of the Ping River in Tambon Tha Ngiew area and officially upgraded the district at the same time." The government upgraded which district from what to what?
*"The name Banphot Phisai comes from the mountains in the district that look likes row of Prang." According to my dictionary is "Banphot" (Thai: บรรพต) a mountain, a mountain range, a hill, a rock and "Phisai" (พิสัย) district, region, country, realm. What has a Stupa (Prang) to do with this name??
--hdamm 13:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Hartley Castle

message: Thomas w Hartley 142.68.222.48 (talk) 22:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I believe this is my family's fortress.  How do I contact the owners
Talk:Paul Amen

message: I've done a fair bit to expand this article.  Hopefully it's not overly biased or trivia filled, but I had to add a little something when I saw that it existed: Paul Amen was my grandfather.  There's enormously more where this came from, but I don't have time to add it now (and it's possible that someone so closely connected with the subject of the article is the wrong person to be its primary author).--Steuard (talk) 09:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Steuard, I'm not sure if you are still interested in editing the article, but WP:COI has some helpful information and guidelines with regard to editing articles with which you are affiliated. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:27, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion of entry
Talk:List of Motorcycle Hall of Fame inductees

message: I went through a semi-automated process to introduce wikilinks to relevant biographies.  Used this sed script to create Firstname Lastname links for each name:
s/^*\([^[].*\)\( ([0-9]\{4\}\)/\*\[\[\1\]\]\2/g
then hand-edited out redlinks and disambiguated links to erroneous individuals.  The remaining redlinks are mostly to Firstname Lastname (motorcyclist) now. -- Brianhe 01:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikilinks