Talk:North American B-45 Tornado

message: Needs inline citations to complete the requirements. --Colputt 01:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class 

message: I doing a report on the B-45 Tornado and I can't find the specific date when the B-45 Tornado retired so it can make my report more appropriate. I went to Wikipedia and it just said 1959. Anyone out there have an answer?216.167.146.183 (talk) 21:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?-?-1959 

message: This article made the claim that:
"The B-45C was the first jet aircraft capable of aerial refueling."
However,
http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=569
(ref 2 in the article) states of the B-45C "The addition of the refueling probe made the Tornado the first multi-jet engined bomber in the world to be refueled in mid-air."
http://www.meteorflight.com/A55D74/meteor.nsf/pages/flight_refuelling
states that the first in-flight refuelling of a Gloster Meteor jet fighter took place on 24th April 1949.
Given that this Wikipedia article states: "The first B-45C was flown on May 3, 1949", clearly the B-45C was not the first jet aircraft capable of aerial refuelling - and the claim to that end at http://www.johnweeks.com/b45/index.html (reference 3) is mistaken.
I've amended the article in line with on-line reference sources, cited above.
86.171.152.94 (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-45C and in-flight refuelling 

message: Well, that's a common comment for wiki as it seems, well, rather curiously written in general, but this article includes the following very interesting section: "in mid-1948 the Air Staff actually began to question the B-45's value. Soon afterwards, President Truman's budget restraints reduced Air Force expenditure and B-45 production was reduced to total of 142 airframes. Further budget cuts in the FY 1950 forced the Aircraft and Weapons Board to cancel 51 of the 190 aircraft on order. It was later replaced by the supersonic Convair B-58 Hustler." To start, "actually began"? This sounds like the writer is almost incredulus that the Air Staff would question buying an airplane that was rapidly being made obsolete by aviation progress. Then the reader is treated by the rather clarvoyant observation that the production was reduced to 142 aircraft before the decision was made to reduce the orders for 190 aircraft by 51. Finally, the real interesting observation is that the B-45 was replaced by the B-58 - really? The B-45 left SAC service some 7 or 8 years before the B-58 entered. Seems like SAC was waiting an awfully long time...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.16 (talk) 18:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Who wrote this?

message: Please ponder the following:
:96 aircraft (47-001 – 47-097)
:B-45A-1 47-001 – 47-022 (21 aircraft)
:B-45A-5 47-023 – 47-096 (73 Aircraft)
:B-45A 47-097 static test airframe
If the first one of anything is "1" then "97" would be the 97th. I merely question the first line that states "96 aircraft (47-001 - 47-097)." If 47-097 isn't considered an "aircraft" because it was a "static test airframe," then I think including it in that first line is confusing. It is to me, anyway, because the numbers are sequential with no break or skip. 47-001 to 47-097 equals 97 built. Or am I missing something?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.248.185.22 (talk) 21:07, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I'm back and logged in now. I'd just like to further state that if you add the totals given for the A-1 and A-5 variants, you get 94. I think that should be 22 for the A-1 and 74 for the A-5. At least that gets you to the 96 stated on the first line. It still leaves the question of 47-097 open, though. This is simple math here. Or, again, am I missing something?Jororo05 (talk) 23:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants