Talk:Paul London and Brian Kendrick

message: Have they done the 'Get Well Soon' in this run? I haven't seen ALL their matches, but I've seen quite a few and don't recall it. Tromboneguy0186 18:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: they havent used it except for the first match that they returned as a team on WWE Velocity. However, they often used the move to finish matches in their initial run in the tag division ---Paulley 20:21, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: It says they've only faced each other once since they started teaming, but I could have sworn the fatal 4 way took place after they became a team.
:I think it was talking about one-on-one action.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.31.109.163 (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: I don't think the championship list is necessary, for goodness sake it's only got one thing in it. The history section already mentions their title win. Also see Wikipedia:Embedded lists, which states that lists make Wikipedia worse, not better. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, trivia sections are generally bad form, see WP:AVTRIV. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But its in every other wrestler/tag team bio on wikipedia, i just dont think we can get rid of it on one and leave it on others... i mean are we goin to go remove the titles section from the Dudley Boyz article now.... as for Trivia the only reason its their is because we got fed up of reverting the Hooliganz comment every three hours --- Paulley 19:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: lol Just because it's on every other one doesn't mean it's good form and it clearly runs counter to the style guide. I suppose we could leave it, although it still doesn't make too much sense to have a list with one already mentioned bit of info in it. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy and Trivia 

message: I thought they were reffered to as Gemini at one point, when they wore masks 80.229.169.189 10:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, and I'd like to raise into question the officialness of "HooliganZ" as well, especially as it appears nowhere in the article prose. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Name 

message: It says that they were the PWI 2006 Tag Team of the Year, but the wiki page for PWI says they were first runner up. Styles and Daniels won.Kirby17 05:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PWI 

message: Here's proof that they're the new World Tag Team Champions - a picture taken by a fan in attendance in Cape Town.  Steveweiser 23:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it has been confirmed, but so far WWE isn't acknowledging it, so I don't think it will be officially recognized. Most likely Cade and Murdoch will get the titles back before they come back to the US. It was most likely an extra treat for the fans over there. Just have to wait and see. --Zii_XFS 19:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

text: maybe you should take a look at this WP:CIVIL  and if it is aired tomorrow, then we can wait till tomorrow and add it then. Diivoo 20:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I didn't provide the link so "somebody could be right and somebody could be wrong." Please remain civil.  As you can see here, you, as well as everyone else, didn't "know everything" as you seem to have stated that L&K would be announced as the champs on RAW on Monday.  Obviously this is not the case as Cade and Murdoch won the titles back.  In the future, please let events play out, wait for confirmation from reliable sources, and do not make demands of other Wikipedians. There should never be a rush to first add information to articles and then search for credible sources.  Thanks, --Naha|(talk) 00:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Tag Team Champions 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Paul London and Brian Kendrick's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "wwe":
From Paul London: 
From Matt Hardy: 
From Jeff Hardy: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Paul London and Brian Kendrick]] 

message: I've removed this article's GA nomination because it is not ready to be nominated. Here is a list of things to work on before renomination:
*WP:LEAD - The lead needs to summarize all the main points of the article.
**Done.
*Ref #35 is invalid.
**Not sure if its still invalid. 
*A lot of the sources are missing authors and dates or are deadlinks.
**I think that's taken care of. 
*There is a lot of information that requires a source. I've added some citation needed tags to reflect this.
**Done. 
*"Subsequently, they had an impressive showing against Tag Team Champions, MNM (Johnny Nitro and Joey Mercury)" - sounds like POV
**Re-worded so it doesn't sound POVish.
*I'd like to see some more varied sources (not WWE or Online World of Wrestling).
**Added some Slam! and WrestleView sources. 
Let me know if you need some help. Nikki♥311 19:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully, I've gotten your queries. If there's more, please let us know. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAN removal 

message: An image used in this article, File:Londrick.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Londrick.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion