lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Id (album)

message: It is not spelt with a capital d, the album cover doesn't even use a capital i, but I'm sure that's just for show. Also there is no need for this to be a (2001 album) article, have moved both The_ID_(album) and The_Id_(2001_album) to this page, please do not mess with it JayKeaton 03:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

message: John Frusciante from Red Hot Chili Peppers played at the track Sweet Baby. I put this months ago in the article, and someone just take off.
How cool huh?--César 01:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He only played the guitar, while Erykah Badu is a featured vocalist. Besides, only Badu's name appears on the album's back cover. Funk Junkie (talk) 16:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Frusciante 

message: No mention of the inclusion of this song in Spider Man.
75.73.244.49 (talk) 04:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Nutmeg Phantasy 
Talk:Milwaukee (town), Wisconsin

message: I don't remember offhand who grabbed the last bits of the old Town of Milwaukee in 1955, so I just left that question vague. At least now there's an article.  (And of course, if there isn't already, now we need a disambiguation page for the three Milwaukees (and maybe Milwaukie, Oregon as well?)--Orange Mike 03:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

message: As with most geographical articles, a map would be helpful. -Phoenixrod (talk) 16:21, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 
Talk:Wipeout 3

message: :Do we have any other source that it runs at 720x480?
:IIRC, the PS1 only runs up to 640x480, and when run in an emulator (pSX), it reports that it runs at 512x256 (which is higher than the 320x240 many other PS1 games ran at), but I don't have a specific source to cite for this.
:76.111.227.164 (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Resolution

message: It would make sense to run this as a featured article in 2019, on the 20th anniversary of the game's release. But that's 2 years from now. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been done now in 2019. -iaspostb□x 00:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main page:
Talk:Wipeout 3: Special Edition

message: The result was merge into Wipeout 3. -- RubyJester (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, no reason not to merge this. --Mika1h (talk) 19:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Wipeout 3
Talk:Wipeout Fusion

message: wtf Why does the cover say Bam Entertainment?  I live in the UK, my copy doesn't say that.  It doesn't say Bam Entertainment anywhere. JD 16:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's who published it in the US.  Perhaps it was published by a different company in the UK. — Wwagner 17:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think Challenge Mode was introduced by Wipeout 64, not Wipeout 3 as stated here. 194.221.212.20 14:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. As stated here. Now changed - RubyJester (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Challenge Mode

message: This entire section not only fails to cite any sources, but also is nothing more than one editor's opinion of the game and either needs to cite sources or be removed entirely.ChronoSquall14 (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: Quit listing the "engine" for games like this. You're guessing, and you're wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.33.43.30 (talk) 19:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine
Talk:Paris' law

message: Hey, it was a good start to this page. I am P.V. Sairam, a master's graduate at Cornell University. As part of our course project, I am planning to edit this article by 17 May 2019. My advisor for this project is Prof. Alan Taylor Zehnder (https://www.engineering.cornell.edu/faculty-directory/alan-taylor-zehnder). Hope we can get in touch if you have anything to share after my edits. Also, I would like to mention that I am planning to replace most parts of the current article with your permission to make it more accurate. So, it would be great to hear back from you on this.
Thanks!
 Sairam Pamulaparthi Venkata (talk) 20:13, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing this page 

message: The formulas use the symbols δ and also Y. Both symbols are not introduced. while anyone close to engineering might be able to guess that the former has something to do with stress (which stress?) the interpreted of the latter is open. Perhaps it just a sub/super-script for sigma?? Please, clarification is needed! Tomeasy T C 14:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing explanations 

message: The 1961 reference given for Paris's first introduction of the law doesn't tell the whole story. In the paper, he introduces the idea that fatigue can be understood as driven by the stress intensity factor and plots data with logarithmic scales, but does not go as far as postulating a general law. I've seen a 1964 reference given elsewhere for Paris's power law - https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19640039750 but I haven't been able to get hold of a copy Zxcv9147 (talk) 15:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: To regain a bit of focus on the Paris equation I have moved part of the page into a new page.
Although some of the examples use also Paris, they seem more relevant to generic crack growth.
NeedsGlasses (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split page to 'Crack growth equation'
Talk:Greater hog badger

message: The initial revision of the page leads me to believe it is plagiarized from another site.  I have wikified the page but tagged it on watch.  If sources are not added soon I will prod it.  --DCrazy talk/contrib 04:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarized?

message: a.k.a. the balisaur, a word that was stolen from the OED by a mole-like creature --88.73.11.62 (talk) 22:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balisaur 

message: The article lists the species as Least Concern but the side bar says Near Threatened. Which one is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.254.9 (talk) 01:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Least Concern or Near Threatened 

message: The "hog badger" refers to three different species now, one of which is listed as Vulnerable by the IUCN. The binomial name listed for this page refers specifically to the greater hog badger. I tried to change the article to reflect this, but this was removed. I backed this up with references from the IUCN even. Any particular reason this was removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.247.178.102 (talk) 22:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three species?
Talk:Jacking

message: Man I could go for some jacking right now, I could just picture myself jacking to music. I want that album, whichever one has "Jack your body" as the sample. JayKeaton 04:06, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If nobody vetoes, I'd like to simply delete the section on "pop culture" in this article. It has almost nothing to do with dance moves (except for the last paragraph that isn't particularly informative though), but is rather about music, and, as such, not so much about jacking, but about the influence of house music on pop music. So, sometimes, less is more... I hope you all are okay with this measure! If not, please let me know within the next days. Thanks, WilhelmSchneider (talk) 12:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture
Talk:Roy Walton

message: The following was provided by Roy Walton1 <roy at roywalton1.demon.co.uk>, May 5, 2006 10:18:50 PM:
* Born in London 1932
* Interested in magic since the age of eight
* Two books on card magic published by L Davenport and Co. of London
* Awards from the I.B.M. and the Magic Circle for contributions to card magic.
* Contributor to most magazines on card magic in the English language.
* Now lives in Scotland
-- Robocoder 23:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical Data 

message: I have rv'd the bibliography back in, since this was deleted with no specific discussion. Whilst this is of specialist interest it is probably unique given the wide dispersal of his publications across the years in journals of varying obscurity, it has academic significance, and given the nature of card tricks, it is reasonable to include the TOC of his books. This bibliography has been a labour of love for card afficionados for some time.
I have copied most of the delete/keep discussion here for the purposes of comment:
:Delete - Notability not established. Mais oui! 22:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Neutral for now, this Gsearch returns a lot of hits. Some of them are clearly not this subject, but some of the earlier ones are. I could be convinced he satisfies WP:N --Deville (Talk) 01:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Keep, article is really sparse, but there is a large number of g-hits that reference him as a classic magician and innovator. His "contributions" probably warrant an article - a better one, at least. Kuru talk 01:32, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Keep google suggests he is in the top rank of his profession. Sumahoy 03:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Keep: google on "Roy Walton" magic gets 500,000 hits, most of which refer to him as a very notable magician ("It’s been said that Roy Walton invented one of the most original card effects of all..."), he seems to have written several books [1] [2]. AnonEMouse 17:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Comment Hmm...no ISBN numbers for those books. Bookfinder shows two entries from L. Davenport, a self-purported "maker and publisher" of magic. Google shows lots of stuff attributed to Roy, but not a single morsel of biographical information, other than he manages a magic shop in Glasgow, Scotland.[3] I'll send them an email inquiry and see if we can dig up anything. -- Robocoder 21:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The Complete Walton Vols 1 & 2 do not have ISBN numbers. Jellytussle 20:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rv of the bibliography and a comment on the Delete discussion. 

message: This is a great article, and Roy Walton is a heavy hitter.....no question about that......but even as a devoted student of magic, this article is a bit on the crufty side for a general encyclopedia. Bddmagic (talk) 20:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  crufty
Talk:Derby (horse race)

message: There's a notable lack of what a differentiates a derby from any other horse race in this article. --87.82.24.11 04:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Potential and realities of abuse of horses, drugging them, and injury done by having a rider on their spine. 2603:6011:222:9F00:FD05:7097:6B80:CFE9 (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negatives about horse racing
Talk:Joanna Dark

message: Cherry lipped vixen Shirley Manson of the band, Garbage inspiration to Jo Dark concept?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.91.221.150 (talk) 17:07, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The World is Not Enough

message: Does anyone know the name of the person who does Joanna's publicity shots, she was in FHM, the PDZ commercials, and the Xbox 360 launch party doing some act. --Elven6 15:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Whos that girl

message: Wasn't she British in the 64 version? How did she suddenly become American? --Chaide  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 01:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality
Talk:George van Driem

message: I removed this passage: "The neutrality of Van Driem's methods came under question when an independent group of scholars investigated the Bangani debate after his rebuttal of Klaus-Peter Zoeller's admittedly fanciful thesis. Upon field investigations, Van Driem was found to have travelled with a linguist from Pune only to the transit town of Mori, which lies outside the borders of Bangan by all local accounts. His absolute dismissal of the Kentum thesis thus followed a fieldwork conducted outside a linguistic territory for which it was proposed. The consensus at the end of that field trip by scholars indicated a non-professional basis for his rebuttal, riding merely on his reputation as a himalayan language expert, a territory he seems keen to control in the manner of a monarch." a) Unsourced and clearly contested information. b) no context is given for the "Bangani debate". c) contains unnecessary editorialising. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 04:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bangani debate

message: I found that van Driem maybe have a Chinese name calling Wúwǒ (無我), well, full of the meaning of Buddhism. I found this at this website.--S7w4j9 (talk) 21:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese name
Talk:Aztec society

message: Hello,
It seems to me that the word pilli can only be applied to the sons of the tecuhtli (see Google Books). Why this article doesn't mention it and doesn't explain anything about the tecuhtli? You can find the main references about it in the Britannica article and in CAT.INIST. (and probably in JSTOR).
El Comandante (talk) 10:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pipiltin vs Tetecuhtin 

message: There should be information added on the religion, family dynamics, and the roles that women played within the society. Are there many available sources that cover this material? Kmmy47 (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: New Sections

message: I will be reorganizing the article as well as adding a couple of small sections. The original article was unorganized and somewhat hard to follow, so hopefully the new layout works a little better. There have been some changes or additions to existing sections but the majority of the information is staying the same. Tdbdh4 (talk) 16:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing Structure/Adding Info

message: I will be moving the education section to behind the economics section. I feel this helps the overall organization and flow from most impactful on society to least impactful on society. I will also be reorganizing the economics section and moving the agriculture subsection to the end of that section. Once again, I feel that this helps the overall flow of that section. Tdbdh4 (talk) 16:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Small reorganization
Talk:Mountain range

message: Is there enough to be said about mountain ranges or should this article be merged with mountain? Nurg 04:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mountain range needs to be split, not merged. It seems that it's all piled up here. Mountain ranges are part of a mountain systems and mountain chains and are divided into various plateaus, provinces and, on rarer occasions, ridges, massifs (sub-ranges), and individual mountains. A mountain system however is often used as a general term which, seems in wikipedia, is replaced with a mountain range. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 14:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand or merge with "mountain"?

message: My geology reference is the 1948 edition of Physical Geology by Chester R. Longwell et al., so perhaps the definition in the intro graph of the accompanying article reflects 60 years of decreasing vagueness. But i'd like to see evidence that the following is outmoded -- and even if it is, IMO earlier usage is worth discussion in the article.
:... Descriptions of the larger units or their parts employ somewhat loosely the terms range, system, and chain. As it is desirable to use descriptive terms with a definite meaning, the usage proposed many years ago by J. D. Dana is followed here.
: A mountain range is either a single large, complex ridge or a series of clearly related ridges that make up a fairly continuous and compact unit. Excellent types are the Sierra Nevada in eastern California ... and the Front Range of Colorado. A group of ranges that are similar in their general form, structure, and alignment, and presumably owe their origin to the same general causes, constitutes a mountain system. ... 
: But a still more comprehensive term is needed to refer to a series of chains or systems that make a more or less unified belt of vast extent. ... [Namely:] [c]ordillera....
--Jerzy•t 17:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: In the article it lists the mountain ranges that are not a Part of the Pacific ring of fire or the Aptide Belt, The black hills (despite having the name of hills) are a mountain range and are pretty isolated from both major systems, should they be added? Hiztorynerd2k2k (talk) 18:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to the “independent ranges” list?
Talk:That's Too Much!

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but would an unwritten rule of "That's Too Much!" is that the 1st price that's reveal is not the one to say "That's too much?"  Sorry, I couldn't find a great way to phrase the question.--BigMac1212 04:50, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's never been done, but that's no guarantee that Roger won't do it in the future.  I doubt he'd stick the right stopping point that early in the game, but it's not impossible. -TPIRFanSteve 05:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unwritten Rule

message: This game is way to hard to win. There are to many choices to pick from they should space out the numbers more so its easier. I've only seen the game won a few times since its debut.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Specie8470 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a web forum. If it's not about improving the article, the discussion doesn't go on this site. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 20:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Hard?
Talk:The Woman Warrior

message: she was once from japan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.7.221.146 (talk) 17:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The No Name Woman article does not present sufficient information to stand on its own. It should be merged here. Neelix (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Critical Analysis section proves that the article has enough information for an independent article. Three journal articles aren't enough?Sadads (talk) 13:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[No Name Woman]] 

message: I changed the 2006 photo of Kingston to a 1976 photo in this edit:  I believe a photo of Kingston in a time closer to the book's publication is more appropriate. I forgot to log in and write an edit summary when I made that edit. FunnyMath (talk) 21:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed picture of Maxine Hong Kingston to a 1976 photo
Talk:C.D. Saprissa

message: I have proposed that the article, Deportivo Saprissa World Tour 1959 be merged into this article as I do not believe that the article is notable enough to have an article by itself but that the content is notable and valid to be included into this article. Of course if then the article gets too long it would be perfectly possible to create a new article for the clubs history at History of Deportivo Saprissa as for many other football club articles. I would appreciate comments.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose - the main article is already 30KB long and overloaded with tables and lists. there should, however be a sumary paragraph and a  template linkdramatic (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment - I did mention about possibly having a new article, History of Deportive Saprissa as an alternative to merging the two articles which is quite standard on football articles. That would then mean the main article would not be so big, and the content about the tour plus the clubs full history would be in one place. The table situation can be dealt with by changing the format quite easily. Do you think that might be a good idea?♦Tangerines♦·Talk 19:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Support - The World Tour article should be merged into a newly created History of Deportivo Saprissa article. Selecciones de la Vida (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Song of Solomon (novel)

message: Thank you, whoever, for cleaning up vandalism on this page
The entire "Themes" section was lifted from Sparknotes.com, so I removed it.
"Another major theme is the idea that the individual must find freedom from not only saving himself."  Can anyone make sense of this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.105.211.80 (talk) 13:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: iam looking for some essay topics dealing with sexism in her book Songs of Solomon. anybody have any ideas where these can be found?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.255.209 (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sexism topics in Songs of Solomon?

message: There's been a fair number of additions to the Themes section of the article, but none of these cites any sources, and they may well all be original research. Please add some references to support the claims made. Thanks. Aristophanes68 (talk) 00:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research?

message: I haven't read the book, but the plot summary seems to be all over the place and definitely needs help. At one point it is unclear whether the father Macon or the son Macon hasn't spoken to the sister Pilate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter'sGal (talk • contribs) 01:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary

message: This article is written on Toni Morrison’s novel Song of Solomon. Although I have not read this novel by Morrison I have viewed other discussions of the novel online to get a better understanding. The article does seem to be relevant to the topic of the novel. The summary gave me a good idea of what the novel was about. The only comment I have on the summary is in the conclusion. I was somewhat confused about what “flight” was referring to and why it was quoted. With further reading I discovered it was referring to a suicidal death. This was something discussed among other Wikipedia members on the talk page as well.
The “style” section could be stronger if there was further development and supporting references to contribute to a rich discussion. The “genres” section could be expanded with more detail and examples from the novel. The “reception” section is an interesting touch. It is entertaining and it contributed to my judgment of the novel. In a way, it gave me a desire to read the novel. The external links held some helpful information. These links could be used in adding more to the article.
A section on characters and their descriptions could be added to the article. There is some character descriptions in the summary but a character section would contribute to the structure of the article and its organization. Adding a character section would be helpful as a reference for reading the summary. A section dedicated to critical reviews would also be an interesting contribution to the article. 
Kenzieballantyne (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Evaluation of Article