Talk:PFLAG

message: PFLAG's history page has the banner slogan as "We Love Our Gay Children."
:I don't see it? Benjiboi 12:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Banner slogan

message: Without slapping a million flags on this article, I'll just write that it is poorly written, sourced, and doesn't even really tell me what PFLAG is or what it does as if inherently everyone in the world has common knowledge of it.  This might as well be moved to Wikidictionary as a definition for the acronym PFLAG.  It also doesn't talk about PFLAG action and controversy in terms of its control over its own chapters and its chapters' activities in their communities.  The study of such organizations like P-FLAG is frequently written about in scholarly fields and in newspaper articles. 75.72.162.175 07:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: References for "controversy in terms of its control over its own chapters and its chapters' activities in their communities" would be helpful. Benjiboi 12:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor article 

message: Is PFOX really an opposition group to PFLAG?  It seems like it has its own mission, apart from PFLAG. I'm fixing it, unless there is some source that PFLAG's "popularity triggered creation of an opposition group, PFOX." --Knulclunk (talk) 03:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added refs to address this. Benjiboi 12:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

text: There has to be an encyclopedic way to state that PFOX is aping the name of PFLAG even if we don't speculate why. Benjiboi 14:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: think section is fine, but should it really be such a large part of THIS article??  if the group has any merit other than as people who are "anti" PFLAG then maybe it should be it's own article with just a minor reference to it CyntWorkStuff (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In a tidy world true, but, in my experience, fully referenced sections that painfully spell out what the culture war-ish issues are tend to be left alone. As the rest of the article grows up around this it will simply be the first section that matured. Nothing stops vandalistic deletions like referenced material and until it is referenced it tends to get picked at and watered down. I've learned to use quotes and let the refs speak for themselves. In this case the rest of the article now needsa the same treatment. Benjiboi 19:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: good point, and the article as a whole certainly does need to be beefed-up, I've notices that so many times reasonably inoffensive and ubiquitous entities (or at least to the LGBT & Str8 Allied Communities) like PFLAG get short shrift because they are just "there" and taken for granted - the old "sky is blue" thing CyntWorkStuff (talk) 16:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To be fair PFLAG by its nature isn't flashy so sources are out there. (I bet some books too) Benjiboi 18:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the PFOX paragraph necessarry for this article? It's a whole different organisation and even if it's being referred to in this article, it doesn't need this much space. 24.132.7.152 (talk) 19:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Including this paragraph here is insulting. They are unrelated. There is no such thing as an "ex gay". This is propaganda that is NOT backed up by any credible science. The entire "ex gay" movement was built upon faked data presented by the discredited "conversions" of Masters and Johnson. See Scientific American: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=homosexuality-cure-masters-johnson Lou2u (talk) 08:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Of the 706 editorial words on the entire P-FLAG page, 250 are devoted to P-FOX.  IMHO, this is way too many and detracts from the overall usefulness of the article.  Now that P-FOX has its own Wiki page, I suggest that the discussion on P-FLAG's page be GREATLY trimmed (e.g., to one or two sentences) while retaining the link to the P-FOX page. Any objections? Irv (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PFOX 

message: I had heard a while ago (more than a decade ago) that PFLAG stood for Proud Friends of Lesbians and Gays.  Was this also an acceptable and official acronym for the organization, or did someone make that up randomly? biancasimone (talk) 09:11, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That would fit, but it was started by a parent and I understand the initial meaning was "Parents and Families of Lesbians and Gays".--Casey (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PFLAG acronym 

message: As of this year, the organization has gone from fully calling out its name to the acronym only, in order to represent its full inclusion of bisexual and transgender people. What is the best way to designate that, given the title of the article is the spell out?
Pflagnational (talk) 19:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the article to PFLAG, becasue that is the title used most prominently on the orgainsation's web site. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we clarify the distinction between "PFLAG National" and just plain "PFLAG"? The Press Release (Ref 2) reads: ". . . the membership voted to change the official name of the organization from Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays — for which ‘PFLAG’ was an acronym — to PFLAG, reflecting the organization’s inclusiveness; PFLAG National is the official name of the national organization."   So, is the Washington office (and only it) named "PFLAG National" just as my local chapter might be named (and registered as a Texas corporation as) "PFLAG Houston"? Casey (talk) 10:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Tnx to unregistered user Pflagnational for making all the clarifications on the name as well as on the expanding-over-time mission of PFLAG.  But now there is no mention at all of PFLAG National. (However, I did create a redirect page PFLAG National for searches on that name.)   Reference 2 is to a press release from PFLAG National. If future releases will be under that banner, it seems as if this main PFLAG page should mention just who that is and what its role is in the overall organization that's comprised mainly of the 350 or so chapters.  Casey (talk) 17:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

text: Minor correction: Mentioned (with exactly who they are left as an exercise for the reader) near bottom under Popular Culture: PFLAG National provided guidance and support to Degrassi High . . .  Casey (talk) 03:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

text: Made updates to page including cites. No mention of PFLAG National, which is the national organization, which heads up the chapter network of PFLAG. Can add reference to delineate this.::: Pflagnational (talk) 19:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization now called PFLAG National 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on PFLAG. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100617013027/http://community.pflag.org/Page.aspx?pid=267 to http://community.pflag.org/page.aspx?pid=267
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060209072428/http://www.stayclose.org:80/ to http://www.stayclose.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified