lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fitzgerald Theater

message: http://www.mndaily.com/2009/02/11/sans-third-parties-coleman-and-mondale-clash-debate
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1412277/Mondale-rejoins-debate-18-years-on.html
http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/200211/04_zdechlikm_sendebate/?refid=0
Diddydoobop (talk) 05:25, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for Coleman/Mondale debate in 2002
Talk:Eišiškės

message: Was this another part of Lithuania that was "annexed" by Poland after it reneged on the treaty signed between Poland and Lithuania in October 1920? Was the population predominantly Polish or Lithuanian (other than the Jewish population)? Dr. Dan 02:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the population of Eišiškės is predominantly Polish. --Lysytalk 13:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean today or then? Dr. Dan 15:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Today of course. Until the war, it had mixed Jewish-Polish-Tatar-Lithuanian population, predominantly Jewish. --Lysytalk 15:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm? The article states that the population today is close to 4000 people (who you say are predominantly Polish). The article also states that 4000 Jews were killed during the war. Was the town's population dramatically higher in 1939-1945? What determined if an inhabitant was a Tatar? Looks, language, religion? During the Polish occupation, did Lithuanians "loudly" proclaim their nationality, or were they more inclined (like your own ancestors) to speak their native language at home and the "official" language on the street? Once again I hope you are not using language as the primary basis for determining "nationality", especially after all of our recent "progress" on the talk pages of Jan Dzierzon. Dr. Dan 16:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, about 85% Polish. I don't know how this was determined, probably the 2001 census. --Lysytalk 16:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Labas Lysy

message: Listed as under Polish, however it looks more Yiddish to me (cf. "Schnipishok" for Snipiszki). Should it be changed?
203.56.87.254 (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Eishyshok" 
Talk:Mantorville, Minnesota

message: Does somebody want to do something about this article??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.239.61.30 (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umm 
Talk:Lists of battles of the French Revolutionary Wars and Napoleonic Wars

message: Hi, I have actualized the list, including some battles from different campaigns, but I'm spaniard (a bloody one :D), and I couldn't resist to include some "spanish" words for the battles of the Peninsular War (as "Zaragoza" or "Medina de Rioseco" for example) these are the correct syntaxis in spanish. Maybe somenoe will find that this is not correct for a list in english, but I think that the sense and the flavour is better in this way.
Sorry for my poor english
Javier Muñoz  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.145.162.250 (talk) 23:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actualization 

message: Hi, 
I changed the end date to July 1815 so as to include the battles fought after Waterloo.
Grant McKenna (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: End Date

message: I noticed this page is called "List of Napoleonic battles", and not "List of battles of the Napoleonic  Wars".  Why this is this page an acception to this rule?  For instance, others are correctly title such as: List of battles of the Spanish–American War, List of battles of the War of the First Coalition, and List of battles of the Russo-Japanese War.  Should the name not be changed than? J-Man11 (talk) 02:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've renamed it , and turned this article into a DP. At Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#List of Napoleonic battles I've explained why. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 13:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change proposal
Talk:Minnesota Governor's Residence

message: It is my impression, as a lifelong Minnesotan, that "Governor's Mansion" is used more in common conversation and in news articles than "Governor's Residence" in reference to this building. I did a Google search comparison:
Minnesota + "Governor's Residence" = 13,700 hits
Minnesota + "Governor's Mansion" = 76,600 hits
(The official name is the State Ceremonial Building, but that is rarely used except in formal documents.)
I propose moving this article to Minnesota Governor's Mansion. Jonathunder 23:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. Jonathunder 12:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

text: A state website may use that, but that does not make it the official name. The official name by Minnesota law is "State Ceremonial Building" but no one ever calls it that. Wikipedia article titles generally go with the most common name. Jonathunder 02:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

text: After reading the official website, it certainly seems as if the official name is now "Governor's Residence".  I have also heard it called the "Governor's Mansion", but I wasn't sure which was more common.  So I googled "Minnesota Governor's Residence" and "Minnesota Governor's Mansion".  The number of hits was almost identical at about 700 for each.  The NRHP calls it the "Horace Hills Irvine House", definitely not the most common name for it. It is administered by the "Governor's Residence Council", so I'm inclined agree with Smith03, and second the motion to Move it back to "Minnesota Governor's Residence"--Appraiser 14:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 
Talk:Four Sergeants of La Rochelle

message: It seems to be terribly lacking in context and completeness and does not flow well. Could an expert please have a look and try to rescue it a bit? I am not sure that it is a viable article in its present form. And what is the La Rochelle link? It is not explained at all here. Someone tried to link it from there and I am sorry to say I undid it as there is, currently, no point. Best to all DBaK (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article really all here? 

message: The French version of this page has much more detail, so I've added a (pretty rough) translation of the historical background, including some of the French-language citations. It's not ideal, but it's something. Feel free to revert if thought necessary. Telemachus12389 (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! It's getting so much better. Cheers DBaK (talk) 19:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added section from the French page
Talk:Treaty of Anagni

message: The article is generally very short on references, but I note particularly that under "secret clauses" it lists the ceding of Sardinia and Corsica to the Aragonese, but then says the clause is in doubt.  Can anyone explain why or give any citation for the clause's existence or dispute over its existence? TheCormac (talk) 14:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Secret Clause on Sardinia and Corsica
Talk:Johann Carl Megerle von Mühlfeld

message: Johann Georg Megerle von Mühlfeld is mentioned in the NHM pages as 'younger son' of Johann Baptist Megerle, but johann carl is mentioned in the same page without any mention of relationship. i suppose it could mean that he is the older son of johann baptist, but i could not verify this. i could not even find out the birth year of j. baptist, to see if that fits. anyway, i *suppose* that he is the only one that made taxonomical descriptions, so i will link him, and not his brother Georg. --Sarefo 02:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: relationship

message: says that Megerlia etc. were named after Johann Georg, but that seems to be false, as Johann Carl was the curator for molluscs. --Sarefo 03:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  taxa 
Talk:Robert Street Bridge

message: Using bold designs of the past, the 2010 jordans shoes will take you through rugged weather in style.
Air Jordan 2010 Italic textdesign initial stages, Michael Jordan once proposed whether can make section of part transparent athletic shoes, like this designs may annotate bull 23 myself that kind "Seen through the opponent's every move" ability well. "Air Jordan 2010 intend to Michael in the Jordan field ability extends the respect, he may completely understand the match every action and every movement, but only lets the match see own hoped opposite party sees part of movements." Tinker said that "Instinctively he was able to predict opponent's next move at the same time be good to cover up their market intentions, which he became only the best basketball players in the history of some of the factors." Therefore, transparent instep use certainly not for merely out of the ordinary, is not wins favor by ostentation, but a continuation of the spirit of air and the inheritance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetion77 (talk • contribs) 07:28, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Jordan spirit of continuity- Jordan 2010
Talk:Michael Bennett (boxer)

message: This article would need futher sources to confirm the only source offered, which when visited has a note below that states literally: " NB this record may be incomplete and/or inaccurate -
To link to this record please use <A href='http://www.boxrec.com/record031059.html' target='_BLANK'>Michael Bennett</A>". I do not believe that we can trust an article that it's only source says that we can't trust it. I would ask for futher sources or delete the article.
--Francisco Valverde 02:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed article, needs futher verification
Talk:Concentration of measure

message: It might be nice to add a link to the following book.  I'll let someone who is better than me at linking to books do it.  The book: The Concentration of Measure Phenomenon by Michel Ledoux, ISBN-10: 0821828649, 
ISBN-13: 978-0821828649  Lavaka 02:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you Lavaka 18:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: ...where the infimum suprenum is over all 1-Lipschitz functions...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.232.18.115 (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  suprenum not infimum or do i misunderstand smth.? 

message: Can someone explain metric measure space or however it was worded, it took so long for me to figure out how to write here that I forgot what I was asking.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Punstress (talk • contribs) 19:50, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Need explanation

message: The section "Concentration on the sphere" uses a variable x_0 that is never defined.
--188.22.38.215 (talk) 07:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  <math>x_0</math> not defined 

message: I'm not sure if this should be included as a citation or is a plagiarism (used in the lightest possible sense) of the wikipedia text, but very similar language can be found in these notes:
https://web.math.princeton.edu/~naor/homepage%20files/Concentration%20of%20Measure.pdf Borholquib (talk) 16:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verbatim text from/in uncited source
Talk:Tom Clancy (singer)

message: Hallo, here is written that he was born in 1924, on imdb is written 1923. Does anybobdy know who's right? Thanks in advance. Bye, 2A02:810B:19A0:2440:15DF:869F:2A97:7955 (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth?
Talk:Phil Pfister

message: His BMI is stated as 39. That is obese, and the whole body-mass index is usually thrown-off by large muscles. I think it should be deleted. in fact, it probably isn't accurate; anyone could use a chart or go online and find the height and weight match-up. unless it is from his official website, it probably was done that way.--Screwball23 talk 03:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: BMI

message: He's listed in the 1971 births page, but the article says 1970.Originalname37 (talk) 03:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date
Talk:Master of Crossbowmen

message: I changed the name of the article to Master of Crossbowmen. The French article is named Maître des Arbalétriers, not Grand maître des arbalétriers and the Medieval Warfare Source Book (p. 168) and French Medieval Armies 1000-1300 (p. 11) gives the name as the Master of Crossbowmen. Carl Logan 07:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Ramnulfids

message: I believe that ascribing the arms shown here (Argent, a lion rampant gules) is incorrect for the Ramnulfids. The earliest that I can find a reference to these arms to a Count of Potitiers is for William FitzEmpress, the brother of King Henry II of England. William was the brother-in-law of Eleanor of Aquitaine and not a direct descendent of the Ramnulfid line of counts of Poitiers. It is highly unlikely that any Ramnulfid carried any coat of arms as the last male Ramnulfid count of Poitiers (and Duke of Aquitaine) was William X, who died in 1137, about a half a century before armorial bearings became popular. These arms should be removed from this page unless someone can verify that any of the Ramnulfid counts actually used them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.127.122 (talk) 23:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ramnulfid Arms 
Talk:Treaty of Amity and Commerce (France–United States)

message: I believe that I have created a new section "Background" which fully covers and expands upon this article. If there is disagreement about this I have included the section I have deleted below and am furthermore open to debate on this subject.--Epignosis (talk) 02:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "History" Portion of this Article
Talk:Mitterrand–Pasqua affair

message: What is the relevance of these three individuals to this article? Picaroon (t) 03:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They've all been mentioned as somehow connected to the scandal. I'm not sure how they're connected though, hence they are in the see also section. Feel free to remove them for now. Jose João (talk) 05:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rich, Safa, Yeltsin 

message: Angologate is a colloquial name and i don't think it should be the title. Mitterand-Pasqua Affair would be much more fitting title because there is no reason to relate this incident to watergate. --Givengels (talk) 00:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 
Talk:Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution

message: My reading of "Citizens" was that Schama's work is very much a Francis Fukuyama-style Reagan-era, Thatcher-era take on the French Revolution and there should be more critical response to this.
Suffice it to say it was a mass slaughter, with a grim lithurgy and that led to more tragical consequences. A disaster.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.62.178.67 (talk) 11:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More links to crtical responses to 'Citizens' are needed here 

message: I find this review rather one dimensional and shallow.  It seems that Schama makes at least 3 points in this Work.
# As is mentioned, in the present article: violence was the motor of the revolution.
#The revolution, at least the portion that existed during Jacobin rule, was reactionary.
#The revolution accomplished nothing.  Any change that occurred would have occurred anyway and was already in progress.
I plan balancing this article with the inclusion of points 2 & 3. 
I also plan to produce a brief outline, and add a few critiques of the work:  both positive and negative.
If any have an interest in this article, now, while I am conducting my research is the time to make your viewpoints known.
MarkSonntag (talk) 00:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite needed/Planning one
Talk:1995 strikes in France

message: — Assignment last updated by J2singh (talk) 05:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender, Race and Computing
Talk:Minister of Health (France)

message: This is out dated. See Marisol Touraine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commarchinin (talk • contribs) 12:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The main entry head should be "Minister for Solidarity and Health" per https://www.gouvernement.fr/en/composition-of-the-government. I'm not sure how to change the main heads.
Bradanini123 (talk) 08:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main entry/heading 
Talk:Contextual design

message: The article needs additional sources to demonstrate notability as well as show that it is not advertising. The article especially needs secondary sources for this. --Ronz 03:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs additional sources

message: I found these while trying to verify the current references.  Can someone confirm?
*Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.  Is this supposed to be: Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. Contextual Design : A Customer-Centered Approach to Systems Designs. 1997. Morgan Kaufmann.  ISBN: 1-55860-411-1?
*Holtzblatt, K: Contextual Design: Experience in Real Life. Mensch Computer 2001. refers to ?
--Ronz 03:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This last reference is not available anymore unfortunately. --Tinodb (talk) 10:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

text: I cannot find an isbn for (Beyer & Holtzblatt, 1998).  Can the 1997 reference above be used instead in the article? --Ronz 19:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The ISBN above is correct. The book appeared in 1997 but (as publishers sometimes do), the copyright date printed inside the book is 1998. I think they do that to give the book another year of recency. The citation should be 1998 though--I think that would be less confusing to people trying to track down the book. --Ematienne 20:14, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current refs

message: * Keep - Even though contextual inquiry is used in the contextual design process, it is also independent. Many practitioners use contextual inquiry without using the other parts of contextual design, and the learn about CI without learning CD. I would argue for keeping two separate articles, but certainly having links between them. Ematienne 19:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Contextual Inquiry? 
Talk:List of hospitals in France

message: I have updated the list with the French overseas territories and added the Africa Hospital Template, also.
Why are there two sets of numbers for the hospitals?   What distinguishes them?  
WP:HOS  -- Talk to G Moore 20:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Never heard anything about this question, so I just deleted the numbers and added the year opened instead.  Makes more sense.  Created a cat for Defenct French hospitals, also.  -- Talk to G Moore 03:50, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers
Talk:List of newspapers in France

message: What is Slate doing in this list?! Zatrp (talk) 03:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Slate?

message: It would be useful to see circulation figures as well as the change chart shown. The main titles seem to be around 300,000 which is quite low. Andrew ranfurly (talk) 09:35, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circulation numbers 

message: Translation of a fr.wiki article whose premise seems to be little different to List of newspapers in France FlagSteward (talk) 17:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 11:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Presse quotidienne nationale française]] into [[List of newspapers in France]]
Talk:Regional nature parks of France

message: Hello all- parc naturel translates to nature reserve in English. I have never heard the term nature park, and certainly not natural park, before stumbling across one of our articles (Morvan Regional Natural Park), whose title immediately struck me as bizarre. I was planning to move that article to "Morvan Regional Nature Reserve", then found this article, and thought I should check in with others to make sure I wasn't missing something. Multiple dictionaries that I use give nature reserve for parc naturel, among them WordReference.com, which specifically mentions PNRs. Eric talk 01:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming convention
Talk:Mines Paris – PSL

message: From current, internal and external use: "Ecole des Mines de Paris" as official short name,"Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris" as official long name, "Mines Paris" as new logo. ENSMP is the old acronym, not much in official use currently. Other names such as "Ecole des Mines" (without " de Paris") also in use, and "les Mines" ("the Mines") colloquially. In contemporary French only the first word's initial of an institutional name is capitalized (and also "Paris" here, since it's a city). But all initials can be capitalized in English. 194.214.158.221 16:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The school's name 
Talk:Laboratory for Analysis and Architecture of Systems

message: If portions of the article are a copyvio, the offending text should be removed, but the non-offending parts should be kept, and if necessary marked as a stub. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  13:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: It is a big mistake to have removed the acronym LAAS-CNRS.
"Laboratory for Analysis and Architecture of Systems" is rather ambiguous ; there might be dozens of such laboratories on Earth !
CNRS is a well known acronym for a big French institution for research.
I suggest (LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse) as a title for the institution. Euroflux (talk) 12:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, but this institution is known as LAAS, or LAAS-CNRS, like NASA, CNES, or FBI ; you can see it on the website ! Once again, the link given by you has nothing to do with the subject ! You create your own weird "rules" und you try to make believe that your rules are WP-rules giving a false link. WP "rules" are made to help people and it is written that good common sense is better than any WP real or invented "rule". One person like you on Wikipedia can discourage many potential high level contributors with a stupid application of fake rules. By the way, have you ever written an article of your own on Wikipedia ? Have you been able to write something else than stubs or "redirects" ? You spend your time changing other peoples' article names as if you wanted to make believe that you "write" articles... Why can't you produce something of your own ? Euroflux (talk) 15:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *The title you gave to this article is against guidelines. f you have a problem with that (or with my editing), take it somewhere else. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, but you never demonstrate what you say, which is rather surprising for somebody who claims to be a scientist. You say that my title is against the guidelines but you do not explain why ! You give links which have nothing to do with the subject ! Could you please explain in a few words and in plain English why "my" title - in reality the original title not given by me - is against the guidelines ? Are you able to demonstrate it ? Euroflux (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *Sorry, I gave the wrong link above. Wikipedia:Article titles is what I meant. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The acronym LAAS-CNRS should remain
Talk:Beur

message: This article describes all the different ways the word "beur" is used, but this almost seems to condone its use. I think there should be more focus on the fact that it is a derogatory term.  — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 20:21, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but it's not, it's actually used by the younger generations of Arabs to refer to themselves (if you actually read the one ref). When the French won the 1998 World Cup, everyone from TV journalists to respectable newspapers spoke about the "black, blanc, beur" team (black/white/arab) as a parody of the traditional "bleu, blanc, rouge" of the French flag. So I will remove the neutrality tag and try to find some refs about French backslang (verlan). CaptainScreebo Parley! 22:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 