Talk:Tumbler Ridge

message: BIG PROBLEM: Hi I am user:Ichmichi from Wikipedia.de. 
I recognized a mistake in the geographical data of the object described in the article. Please correct the placement data of the object. I found it in Russia (!) near to the "Baikal Sea"! --80.138.69.1 01:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: I have noticed the removal of the link to  District municipality. I understand it was done in good faith, however this style of wikilink was well received in the consensus-built approach to settlement types in infoboxes of Ontario municipalities (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ontario/Archive 1 section 83), and I see no reason why it should not also apply to BC. The Easter Egg problem is important in wikipedia, but I do not see how this is an easter egg, it links exactly to what it states it should link to. Mattximus (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This link is quite similar to the "confederation" example given at WP:EASTEREGG: you would expect it to link to the article district municipality, as opposed to a much more specific article. Actually, since the article District municipality actually includes the list currently being linked to, linking to district municipality would seem to be the best way to resolve this; I have implemented that. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't revert lest starting an edit war, but it seems strange to link to district municipality, which is just a stub and talks about Ontario and South Africa instead of the more appropriate District municipalities in British Columbia which is specific to the context. Mattximus (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no article District municipalities in British Columbia - that's a redirect to the list. Of course District municipality could be further improved to make it less stubby. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: But you would rather the stub that doesn't really have to do with the municipality in question than the article specifically dedicated to British Columbia? Mattximus (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The stub has a section specifically dedicated to British Columbia, which could be expanded; the other article is primarily a list. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking in Infoboxes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Tumbler Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140713004716/http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/library/Name%20Incorp%202011.xls to http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/library/Name%20Incorp%202011.xls
*Added  tag to http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/data/pop/pop/mun/Mun8696a.asp
*Added  tag to http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/data/pop/pop/mun/Mun9606a.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928081036/http://www.sd59.bc.ca/vpage.php?p=content+districtteams+boardoftrustees.html to http://www.sd59.bc.ca/vpage.php?p=content+districtteams+boardoftrustees.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tumbler Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130614000834/http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/station_metadata_e.html?StnId=1275 to http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/station_metadata_e.html?StnId=1275
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sd59.bc.ca/vpage.php?p=content%20districtteams%20boardoftrustees.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tumbler Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.eao.gov.bc.ca/epic/output/documents/p252/1152221839680_65c285e6ee3f4c2ab08ae03883047d05.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080302093359/http://www.westerncoal.com/properties/index.php to http://www.westerncoal.com/properties/index.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517235153/http://www.westerncoal.com/properties/wolverine.php to http://www.westerncoal.com/properties/wolverine.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tumbler Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116045952/http://www.dawsoncreek.ca/documents/southpeaceprofile.pdf to http://dawsoncreek.ca/documents/southpeaceprofile.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This older Featured Article needs work to rise to current FA criteria. Issues:
* there are several uncited paragraphs ("History", "Infraestructure", "Culture, recreation and media", "Government and politics");
* the "Demographics" section needs to be updated to the most recent census;
* the "Economy" section needs updating;
* the lead is confusing, it goes from mining issues to dinosaur prints to mining issues; there's also too much detail about mining in the lead;
* From the lead: I can't find the "projected population of 10,000 people" or the "weakening Asian markets" anywhere in the body of the article. 
These are just examples.  RetiredDuke (talk) 22:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  does the article meet the featured article criteria? If so, can you remove its notice from WP:FARGIVEN and mark it as "Satisfactory" at WP:URFA/2020A? If not, can you outline your concerns below? Thanks Z1720 (talk) 02:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA in need of review