lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1740

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:20, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: I not agree using the word riot evidence by the picture in national archived in museum    
Cf. Maritiem Museum, inv.nr. MMPH-WAE-P788. show the massacre des chinois word been use. http://www.nationaalarchief.nl/amh/detail.aspx?page=dafb&lang=en&id=1897#tab0
Daimond 13:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Batavia, 1740 massacre
Talk:1739

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:21, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1738

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:21, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: Nearly all of the most recent edits are a) vandalism by unregistered users (either page/section blanking or references to the song which features the number) or b) reversions of said vandalism. Perhaps allow only autoconfirmed users for a month, if vandalism continues place indefinite protection. MB298 (talk) 03:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible protection 

message: i would like to put that this does not relate to fetty waps song 1738
Roblafo (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --allthefoxes (Talk)  23:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2016
Talk:1737

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:22, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1736

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:23, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1733

message: hello
I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:24, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I seem to recall that it was in 1733 that an exdpedition paid for by the French king did geodetic measurements showing that the earth is oblate rather than oblong, thereby finally settling the dispute between Newtonian physics and Cartesian vortex physics.  If anyone knows the details, it seems that should be included here and in an article about it. Michael Hardy 15:00, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Crucial test of Newton versus Descartes
Talk:1734

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:25, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1732

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:29, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1731

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:29, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:Factitious disorder imposed on self

message: I think this article should contain information about the more recent increase in disorder faking, especially faking multiple personality disorder. 104.200.213.13 (talk) 14:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @104.200.213.13 i second this 2.221.111.175 (talk) 19:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent increase in disorder faking, primarily on tiktok 

message: As his Name is Münchhausen, which is equal to Muenchhausen I thnik we cannot irgnore facts, even if they have continued to be so flawed for a long time. We cannot simply change proper names or names and omit or change letters. 2A02:908:616:62A0:8009:B55D:8996:D9DE (talk) 08:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Even at the time of your writing, read whole first sentence of History section. —Mykhal (talk) 20:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Name
Talk:1730

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:31, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1729

message: This article claims it was discovered in 1729, whilst the Aberration of light article claims it was discovered in 1725. I've removed it from this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.196.157 (talk) 13:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aberration of starlight

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:31, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: The number 1729 is quite well-known among mathematicians, perhaps there should be a disambiguation for this particular integer? Mathteacher1729 00:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxicab Disambiguation
Talk:1727

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:31, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: Surely in 1722 Janet Horne of Durnoch was the last?Apoliheres (talk) 12:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Execution for Witchcraft in Scotland
Talk:1726

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:32, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1725

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:32, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1724

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:33, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1723

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:33, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: On the ‘1723’ page on Wikipedia you list the painter Johannes Voorhout as having died on May 12th 1723.  However, on the ‘Johannes Voorhout’ page, his death date is listed as 25th August 1717. RobJSmallwood (talk) 06:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date conflict  

message: As Discordianism is a tongue-in-cheek religious philosophy, even a piss-take against organised religion itself; can we seriously list the Discordian Calendar as an accepted method of reckoning?
Nuttyskin (talk) 22:46, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If we started using "seriousness" as a criterion, we should start by excluding Anno Domini. Dimadick (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discordian Calendar?
Talk:1722

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:34, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: *June 2 - Wapping, a male negro slave owned by a Mr. Heale, was hanged for murder in the colony of Virginia.
*August 15 - William Battin, age 17, a white man, was hanged on that day for arson and murder in the colony of Pennsylvania.
Do these events have any particular significance? Why are they worth mentioning?  —Dodiad 01:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are these entries here?
Talk:1721

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:34, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1718

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:34, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1717

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:35, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1715

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:35, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1716

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:35, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: There is no mention of any massacre on the page you are directed to ie the Tugaloo zzapper 08:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 
Talk:1713

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:36, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1714

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:37, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1712

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:37, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: The dates here are supposed to be the Gregorian dates. Therefore, there shouldn't be February the 30th. It should be March the 11th, I think.93.172.177.45 (talk) 22:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 30 

message: The current wording is, I think, borderline, and smacks of "Western" bias. The Aeolipile produced mechanical work 17 centuries earlier. It was a practical device in the sense that it could be (and was) actually constructed. Newcomen was the first to apply steam power in an industrial context. I'm struggling for a suitably brief and clear way to express that.
Almonaster (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam Engine
Talk:1711

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:37, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1710

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:38, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1709

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:38, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: The Battle of Poltava is listed under its then-date rather than under its new-style date.  Is there a Wikipedia policy on events like this that took place in a place that had a different date (in this case two different dates) from how we now date them? Kdammers (talk) 01:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which calendar?
Talk:1708

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:38, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikhism#The_ten_gurus_and_religious_authority
Since I know nothing about Wiki, I'll just leave it up to anyone to add the date of Gobind Singh's (9th Guru of Sikhism) Ascension (death).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.170.227.123 (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gobind Singh
Talk:1707

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:39, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1706

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:39, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1704

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:40, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1703

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:40, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1702

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:41, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1701

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:41, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout
Talk:1700

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --(talk)BozMo 16:41, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: Walter Clarke link is wrong: it is associated with a IX-XX century linguist instead of the correct XVII-XVIII Rhode Island governor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.220.105.241 (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No article on the governor exists so I'm unlinking his name. — Joe Kress (talk) 00:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walter Clarke link

message: In which century did the BC ended and AD started? 117.204.90.139 (talk) 10:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  AD 