lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anne Reinking

message: I think it's ANN Reinking. There's already an article here for her. Should the two be merged?
She is DEFINITELY 'Ann' Reinking. This listing should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.94.195.74 (talk) 00:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'd merge. --RossF18 (talk) 18:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Tending the Rose Garden

message: As per Homeostasis07 (talk) 03:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Done...
Talk:Meg Murry

message: How do we know she's Anglican Kitia 19:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is minor evidence from fact that Canon Tallis is Anglican, and the discussion of St. Patrick's Breastplate in A Wind in the Door.  But I agree that it's kind of iffy.  Someone tagged a bunch of L'Engle characters this way months ago, and I wasn't sure it was quite speculative enough to revert them. Karen | Talk | contribs 19:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Fictional Anglicans

message: Towards the end of A Wrinkle in Time, Meg Murry finds out that she is obsessive-compulsive. Maybe we should mention this in her wiki page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.177.219 (talk) 01:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Having read that novel a few dozen times over the years, I can say with reasonable certainty that no such diagnosis is mentioned or even suggested in the book. I'm not certain that OCD as a term was even in common usage circa 1960 when it was written.  Are you perhaps referring to the film adaptation? --Karen | Talk | contribs 06:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsessive Compulsive 

message: The article hypothesizes that Meg is 14 in Wrinkle. However, in-universe references make me suspect that Meg is twelve in Wrinkle and 14 in A Wind in the Door. There is a reference at the beginning of Wrinkle to a girl telling Meg that they aren't in grammar-school any longer, which sounds as if being in grammar school was recent and she has just entered junior high. In Wind, six-year-old Charles Wallace complains that the high school bus doesn't bring Meg home at the same time that she got home previously; this makes more sense if she just entered high school in Wind rather than being a freshman in Wrinkle. The fact that in Wrinkle Meg recognizes Calvin from school but speaks of him as being "several grades above me" suggests that Regional is a combined junior high and high school (which exist in the American Northeast--I went to one). Finally, in Wrinkle, Meg's mother speaks of her "still enjoying playing with her dolls' house," behavior which I can see more easily with a twelve-year-old than a fourteen-year-old. Gehayi (talk) 23:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meg's Age
Talk:Gerry Desjardins

message: Points of interest:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971%E2%80%9372_Chicago_Black_Hawks_season#Transactions
Prior to the start of the 1971-72 season, Chicago traded Desjardins to California for Gary Smith. However, Desjardins failed a physical exam with the new team, as his broken arm was found to have insufficiently healed. The trade has to be rescinded, and the Black Hawks reclaimed Desjardins and sent Giles Meloche to the Seals as a replacement. When Desjardins' arm was deemed okay months later, the Hawks found themselves three goalies, and used all of them in their first round sweep of Pittsburgh in the playoffs. Desjardins would be lost in the expansion draft that followed. It seems a shame that they didn't hang on to Meloche instead of Smith, but realistically he wouldn't have seen much playing time behind Esposito. WHPratt (talk) 13:29, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1971 Trade boomerang
Talk:Sethrida Geagea

message: just to let you know that she was born on may 31 1967. please correct  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.4 (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: who edited this article in May 2018‎ and February 2021, has stated "We are MP Sethrida Geagea's Press Office and we added all the details about Mrs. Geagea's life ...."
I have given them a COI and a Paid editing warning on their talk page. - Arjayay (talk) 13:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest / Paid editing 

message: Hi there, got a question please, why for this page and others I have seen, the following message appears:
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source - even though there are many citations and references in the page.
Thank you 
Ritakayz (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the references
Talk:Drawer dishwasher

message: This is pure advertising. Gwen Gale 19:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

message: "DishDrawer" appears to be a trademark of Fisher & Paykel, and as such, can only refer to the dishwashers made by that company. This makes this really look like advertising, and also makes the mention of the Kenmore dishwashers inappropriate (there is no mention of DishDrawer on the Sears site). The generic term appears to be "drawer dishwasher" (found on Sears and KitchenAid websites).
My suggestion: Either add information to the Dishwasher article or create a drawer dishwasher article. (At this point, a section on the Dishwasher article is probably sufficient.) Then, change this page to a redirect to the appropriate article and section. (F&P was one of the first if not the first dishwasher drawer, and as such, people will use "DishDrawer" to refer to any drawer dishwasher.) HeirloomGardener 21:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of people still use Xerox interchangably with photocopy.  Klinex is used interchangably with paper tissues.  Likewise, people say polaroid for instant photo even though Kodak did something similar for awhile.  I don't mind the title change, but I also think the term dish drawer is acceptable as a generic term.  Kowloonese 22:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your input. I know that DishDrawer may be used as a generic term, but it should not be used that way in an encyclopedia. Using Kleenex as an example, that article is about the company. For information about the generic "kleenex", it refers the reader to facial tissue. I don't think The F&P DishDrawer needs an article, though, so a simple redirect seems appropriate. HeirloomGardener 02:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trademark

message: Since the article was including three different brands, I went ahead and moved the article to the generic "Drawer dishwasher". I also changed most of the references from "DishDrawer" to "drawer dishwasher". Does this address the advertisement tag on the article? Can it be removed? HeirloomGardener 02:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Still advertisement?

message: I have removed the advertisment tag as I do not belive that it still reads like an advert.
Comments? could some please read my changes and check Ctjohnst 04:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: no longer advertisment 
Talk:Little Island, Waterford

message: Situated in the river Suir, the two channels around it are Kings Channel and Queens Channel. One of them is the primary route for river traffic. The other is no longer used much for river traffic and has a ferry between the island and the mainland.--Jmccormac 19:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well, here is (an oil painting of but an actual place) an island of Ardmore Co. Waterford. It is only an island when the tide comes in and called goat island because manys a nosy goat spent the night up there (the grass was greener) ~ R.T.G 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Only island in Waterford"
Talk:Reşat Nuri Güntekin

message: == Roman listesindeki eksik ==
Eski Hastalik romani romanlari arasinda yer almiyor, Turkish Cultural Foundation sayfasinda da yok... Ne zaman yazildigini ariyordum o nedenle dikkatimi cekti. Bilen varsa yazilis tarihoyle eklese ne iyi olur.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaykaramba (talk • contribs) 06:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Eski Hastalik romani romanlari arasinda yer almiyor, Turkish Cultural Foundation sayfasinda da yok... Ne zaman yazildigini ariyordum o nedenle dikkatimi cekti. Bilen varsa yazilis tarihoyle eklese ne iyi olur.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaykaramba (talk • contribs) 06:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman listesindeki eksik 
Talk:The Spy Who Loved Me (soundtrack)

message: relevant? 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:81B:6C8D:817F:5AA3 (talk) 10:50, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  It also latterly featured in a UK TV commercial for the England-based Unigate Diary powdered milk brand 'Five Pints' where, as the commercial tailed out, the relevant session singers could be heard singing "Five Pints...you're the best".
Talk:Nimatullah Kassab

message: Miracle stories can be retained, but should be edited to conform to NPOV.  Ex: "Father Nimatullah is believed to have performed many miracles..."
67.80.38.219 12:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Is there not a little box-template used for Catholic Saints, in the right-hand side, with dates of birth, death, beatification, canonization, etc?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.200.1.254 (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  template for Catholic Saints 

message: Do we not know anything about his life? This article, but for his birth date and place, contains nothing but accounts of his miracles. Surely the author of the article can give us some details of St. Nimatullah's life. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 15:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life? 

message: One "t" or two, one "l" or two, in this saint's name? Please make the corrections. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 15:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling?
Talk:Agaricus campestris

message: When I was a young boy in the late 1950s, my grandfather would take me for walks through cow pastures in the early autumn/fall. He would encourage me to go up to a cow lying on the ground and slap it on the rump, whereupon it would grumpily stand up and walk away. There would often be field mushrooms to be found where the cow had been lying. Does anybody have anecdotal memories about this stuff? Are there any relevent WP:RS? --Ef80 (talk) 21:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with cows
Talk:Aleuria aurantia

message: The current images should be improved.  The very reddish fungus in the taxobox image may not be an Aleuria. Nemetona 14:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: The section "Description" reads "The orange peel fungus has no smended, because it may be confused ..."
What does "smended" mean? I'm not a native speaker, but cannot find it in any dictionary either.
As the section talks about the danger of confusing the fungus with more dangerous ones it should be as clear as possible...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.171.172.244 (talk) 20:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "smended"? 

message: I'm no mycologist. Is this :File:Aleuria aurantia (fungus).jpg added March 2013, actually Aleuria aurantia , or is it (as I would identify it) Sarcoscypha coccinea‎ instead?  Andy Dingley (talk) 12:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image accuracy question
Talk:Amanita caesarea

message: --Sainsf <^> (talk) 13:11, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

message: The picture says it was taken in ohio and yet this mushroom is said to not be in the United States. Please explain  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.56.138.167 (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up. Now to find out what that one is...Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Amanita banningiana according to the source. Ucucha 20:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Amanita caesarea 54730.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 26, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-05-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Amanita caesarea 54730.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: I have no particular reason to doubt the statement that in ancient Rome this mushroom was called "boletus", and then much later the name "boletus" was given to a completely different mushroom instead. However, there doesn't seem to be any mention of how and when that name transfer happened, or where the information about it can be confirmed. TooManyFingers (talk) 20:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Boletus" to ancient Romans: source?
Talk:Chambers Brothers (gang)

message: This article needs an image.  Perhaps a screenshot from the video tapes? =David(talk)(contribs) 16:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:Amanita citrina

message: K so I've been doing research on mushrooms and a lot have psychoactive effects but say inedible for no good reason other than the texture or resemble to another mushroom. But if I wanted to do research on different psychoactive effects of mushrooms is it's just a suggestion to not eat it? 207.161.6.254 (talk) 06:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What if I eat it?
Talk:Amanita cokeri

message: 100x100px|Most likely a Amanitaceae mushroom found in Virginia under a pine tree.
If found these mushrooms beneath a pine tree in Virginia south west of Washington, does anybody know what they are? Somebody suggested it could be a Amanita cokeri. Thanks--Stone (talk) 08:56, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Amanita farinosa

message: The illustration does not show Amanita farinosa.  The illustration is being used without a proper citation of the photographer.  This is not appropriate for a page purporting to have scientific content.
Rtulloss (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, go ahead and delete it then. Ideally pointing us to a proper free image.  de Bivort 00:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Isotope23

message: 75px	Thank you to everyone who took the time to weigh in on my RFA, which succeeded with a final tally of (83/0/0).  I truly am overwhelmed by the support I received.  If there's anything I can help with, don't hesitate to ask. Isotope23 20:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: My RFA

message: Contributions          	Contributions          	Contributions          	Contributions          	Contributions          	Contributions          	Contributions
Su                     	Mo                     	Tu                     	We                     	Th                     	Fr                     	Sa
                  	                  	                  	                  	14                     	15                     	 
17                     	18                     	19                     	20                     	21                     	22                     	 
                  	25                     	26                     	27                     	28                     	29                     	30
                  	01                     	02                     	03                     	04                     	05                     	06
07                     	08                     	09                     	10                     	11                     	                       	
Updated January 11 2007	Updated January 11 2007	Updated January 11 2007	Updated January 11 2007	Updated January 11 2007	Updated January 11 2007	Updated January 11 2007
01                     	05                     	10                     	25                     	50                     	75                     	99
Here's the diff-generator output, and a recent contributions calendar (the first day shown might be inaccurate). Using scripts I wrote. --ais523 12:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some other statistics
Talk:Agaricus moelleri

message: This page appears to be rather confused on taxonomy as well as outdated. It says that Agaricus praeclaresquamosus was used to differentiate the North American counterpart, but that term redirects back to the page for moelleri. In fact the west coast species were split into two, now described as deardorffensis and buckmacadooi. Both species are included in the Agaricus master list but should at least receive a mention here. A. placomyces appears to refer to a similar east coast species. 24.113.239.214 (talk) 22:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  North American species
Talk:Baby Pop

message: In the 1960s there was a French pop song written by Serge Gainsbourg and sung by France Gall.   It was quite important.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inhabitant (talk • contribs) 00:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, WTF. Will one of the wikipedia worker bees please setup a disclaimer/disambiguation page or something??--12.213.80.54 (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby Pop
Category talk:Antisemitic forgeries

message: Yours truly, --Ludvikus 20:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

message: *The above is a subject recognized by the Library of Congress.
*I is necessary to related and explain the relation.
Yours truly, --Ludvikus 20:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Literary forgeries and mystifications]]
Talk:Richwood, West Virginia

message: Wikipedia is a place for facts, not uncited personal opinions (WP:OR). If an editor is going to claim Bob Henry Baber is responsible for the closure of Richwood's schools, they need to produce a reliable third party source stating that. Even if someone does, I still don't see that as being appropriate to note here under "Notable people" since Baber is not independently noteworthy for school consolidation. Bitmapped (talk) 04:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Henry Baber 

message: I don't believe that John Teets meets the standards of notability to be included as a Notable Person from Richwood. He has no article of his own. Being a local newspaper editor and naming a local festival doesn't seem particularly notable by themselves. I believe he should be removed from the list, or if he is to be retained, an article needs to be developed about him. Bitmapped (talk) 00:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Teets notability
Talk:44th Infantry Division (Wehrmacht)

message: I've tagged the article with "unreliable sources" due to high number of citations to various non RS websites. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable sources 
Talk:Habib Shartouni

message: I added an AFT template. The article (about a living person) is without any source whatsoever. Azate (talk) 02:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD 

message: I deleted the phrase, "the Syrians operated with the Secret Services of an eastern country." from the last bit of this article as it is not cited and constitutes a claim of some significance (which generally need to be cited). Talon84.152.249.26 (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Erasure
Talk:Hands of Time (album)

message: There also is a song by  Groove Armada - hands of time, known from the movie Collateral.
Cant handle writing a disambiguititity page tho  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.234.205.28 (talk) 19:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   Groove Armada - hands of time
Talk:Monkey River Town

message: this article should be named Monkey River Town to make way for a substantial new article in preparation on Monkey River itself as a watercourse. Anlace 20:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the article accordingly.  Cheers. -GTBacchus(talk) 19:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change proposal
Talk:Boyz (magazine)

message: I note that much of the history section is woefully unreferenced and has an unencyclopaedic tone. I wasn't sure if it is intended to be promotional but the combination of the tone and the distinct lack of sources lead to the suspicion that it was written from somebody's personal recollection. Then I looked at the history and... It looks like the editor himself was editing the article back in 2019! This is not good. I'll give it a trim back. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. It is an improvement but the lack of sourcing is still awful. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional 

message: I have twice reverted this change. No convincing rationale has been offered for the change in edit summaries and it does not seem to be an improvement. In my view it makes the article more vague and less informative and serves only to spare the blushes of those who might find this perfectly valid content embarrassing. In particular, it is completely unacceptable to fiddle with the title of the referenced article. The source is called . Removing "anti-trans" from the title of the reference, without any indication that words have been selectively omitted, is effectively falsifying a quotation. It is not for us to alter other people's words. It is not for us to spare anybody embarrassment so long as what we are saying is correct and appropriate coverage.   --DanielRigal (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits soft-pedalling the mentions of the LGB Alliance
Talk:Neolecta

message: It is just as well that the latest photo was removed, as it was the wrong fungus. It was Microglossum not Neolecta.Heliocybe 12:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration 

message: I think there is something wrong in the Scientific classification. In the class, order, family, genus of this organism, they all linked to this article. It doesn't make sense. Each of them suppose to has their own article. They are related but not exactly the same. Someone should fix this.Trongphu (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 
Talk:Strict father model

message: The main issue of NPOV tag is that the first paragraph presents opinions as facts:
*"The strict father model of parenting is one which places strong value on discipline as a means to survive and thrive in a harsh world."
*:Language should be tweaked just a tad to make explicit that advocates of the model believe this, not necessarily Wikipedia.
*"Children become more self-reliant and more self-disciplined by having strict parents."  
*:I'm sure this isn't an undisputed fact-- I presume it's the opinion of the advocates of the strict father model.  It should be cited with a ref and attributed as "according to advocates of the strict father model, ..."  
*"The parent, particularly the father, is meant to mete out rewards for good behavior as well as punish bad behavior."  
*:Again, adding "within the strict father model" to the sentence, rather than stating it as a fact that fathers are meant to do this.
Additionally, I'd suggest the article be expanded to include a fuller debate about the subject.  We mention support and criticism of it, but I expect there's more to say.
Anyway, it's not a big NPOV problem at all-- just a few easy tweaks should fix it, but I wanted to let someone else who is actually familiar with the subject matter make the changes. --Alecmconroy 20:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag