Talk:Salmon shark

message: I just removed the claim "The average salmon shark lives approximately 40 years" from the article.  It was not cited, and I could find no real verification for it.  I am unaware of any attempt to estimate the average salmon shark lifespan, but Goldman's thesis (cited in refs) gives a leslie matrix which ends at 30 years (and indicates the vast majority of animals are dead by then). Goldman and Musick's data in their 2006 paper show no animals older than approx. 20 years.  If a source for the 40 year claim can be found, I would love to know about it.  But as it is, I went ahead and removed the claim from the article.  Thoughts or clarifications? --TeaDrinker (talk) 05:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum age of salmon sharks 

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote a good chunk of the article in this edit, based on multiple source (including Fishbase) as cited.  I would be happy to revise out the sections Graham added originally, but suggest Fishbase is still a reasonable source for the article.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 00:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, it looks like such a revision was already done.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 00:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I removed a note about salmon sharks being preyed upon by killer whales.  While it is certainly possible (killer whales have been known to take large sharks, although it is very rare--see Fetyl et al 1997, and Pyle et al 1999, both in Marine Mammal Science), I have not come across something demonstrating salmon shark specifically (and given the rarity of marine mammal stomach contents analysis these days, find it fairly surprising).  Since they are, in any event, likely a minor source of salmon shark mortality (although the details of salmon shark mortality are not really well known), I have taken the liberty of removing it.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 07:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am unaware of any evidence that white shark make up any significant portion of the killer whale diet.  Everything I have seen suggests these are rare or chance encounters (a point made in Pyle 1999).  I would be interested to know of evidence of more frequent predation events, however, if you're aware of something I am not.  In general, apex predator refers to species which have no substantive predators in their habitat (rather than theoretical or rare pairings).  In the case of salmon shark, absent evidence they are substantively depredated by killer whales, I suggest that they are indeed an apex predator (I will have to see if they are commonly referred to as such in the literature, although I don't think it would be a controversial claim among Alaskan fisheries scientists).  --TeaDrinker (talk) 03:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shark predation 

message: "Age and sex composition differences have been observed between populations in the eastern and western North Pacific. Eastern populations are dominated by females, while the western populations are predominantly male...It has been widely speculated that the difference between population differences may be a result of the Japanese fishermen harvesting the male population."  This does not quite make sense as Japan is in the western North Pacific, while the coast of North America is in the eastern North Pacific.  Should the wording of the sentence be switched?  I'm not a salmon shark expert so don't feel that confident doing so. Akwdb (talk) 21:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern vs. western 

message: These sharks commonly have parasites on their fins that look like strings.  These parasites should be described or at least linked to. Will (Talk - contribs) 00:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention made of their parasites 

message: Plz help me 41.116.73.177 (talk) 14:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salmon shark 

message: I think the image on this article is pretty poor. Can anyone find a usable one of better quality? 137.70.12.60 (talk) 18:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image isn't very good