Talk:Bangaru Adigalar

message: ***************************************************************************
Facts have been added with proofs which can be verified at Melmaruvathur. Many books are available to prove that the biography of Bangaru Adigalar considering him as an incarnation and spiritual guru as presented in this article is verifiable .
   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.8.5.100 (talk) 07:53, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page content is verifiable from www.omshakti.net which is an official website of Melmaruvathur Adhiparashakti Siddhar Peetam, Melmaruvathur,Tamil Nadu ,India 

message: I've requested help with the issues of reverting that have been going on.  Hopefully some outside assistance will help get the article on the right track.  Nihola (talk) 16:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting help 

message: Following is the conversation that occured on the user talk pages.  I've moved it here so that we can continue the conversation, and involve the other editors interested in this article.
Hello Boldandstrong, I'm writing to you because I notice that you have been reverting all the editing work on page Bangaru Adigalar for quite awhile now.  I understand that you feel strongly about this person, but when you simply revert back to an older edit, you remove ALL the editing, all improvements.  I worked hard on this article, and was able to remove some of the warning tags, and you simple removed all this work.  Now you have done the same with User talk:TheRingess's edits.  Reverting pages multiple times like this is quite aggresive and is called revert war behavior; it is stongly discouraged.  I will not engage in this behavior with you, but I am going to ask for help from an administrator.  
Below is the link to the recommendations for writing articles about living persons.  Please notice the importance of neutrality and reliable secondary sources.  I hope you will familiarize yourself (selves) with this information, and that we can all move forward together on this article. Nihola (talk) 15:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: ======================

message: Not a notable person delete  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.245.174 (talk) 00:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: =======================

message: As I have not heard back from Boldandstrong, I'm going to revert the article back to the February 18th version, where I worked to address the tags that were on the page.  I hope that we can go from this point to improve the page.  Remember that information needs to be backed up by secondary sources.  If you are not sure what that means, please look here - Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners.  Just because you disagree with a referenced piece of information, doesn't mean you should delete it.  Unreferenced material, on the other hand, really can go at any time.  If the vandalism and reversions begin again, we'll have to decide what to do next.  I'm not starting over here.  Nihola (talk) 01:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving Forward 

message: ---------------
This section is referenced and neutral in tone.  I hope that it will be returned to the article and expanded when more information becomes available.    Nihola (talk) 05:32, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: are these additions cool to remain? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bangaru_Adigalar&oldid=1070404424 OmniusM (talk) 10:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions by blocked editor.