lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Quantal response equilibrium

message: This page contains a link to the disambiguation page "equilibrium". Please change the link to point directly to the most appropriate specific page, e.g.  equilibrium  which displays as equilibrium. Thanks. --Coppertwig 01:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone in the updated version Cretog8 (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|Disambiguation link repair]]: Expert knowledge needed! 

message: * Haile et al criticism that QRE can in principle explain any data.
* Then, also needs response of reasonable restrictions and Regular QRE.
* historical/conceptual ties to Luce, McFadden, purification
* Logit QRE specifically
* Interpreting QRE (Logit specifically)
* Examples (Traveler's Dilemma?)
* Usefulness for experimental data
* IIA trouble
* For extensive forms, AQRE
* Maybe continuous analogues?
Cretog8 (talk) 04:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff needed 

message: Goeree, Holt, and Palfrey say in their New Palgrave article that QRE is a generalization of Nash equilibrium. I should take them at their word, but I'm not quite comfortable with that yet.Cretog8 (talk) 05:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  generalization of Nash equilibrium? 

message: I'm not positive how this would best be categorized. If forced (which I'm not, which is why it's here), I'd do:
Cretog8 (talk) 13:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: O well, I'll go for it. CRETOG8(t/c) 19:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox 

message: Someone posted a critique, when the paper clearly says it is not a critique of QRE.  Please read papers and understand them clearly before you post summaries and references to them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.22.207 (talk) 03:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You would be welcome if you made an honest attempt to contribute to the Wikipedia project and stopped citing your own papers in embarrassing self-promotion. Attic Salt (talk) 03:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

text: They are proposing a (notable) challenge to the concept of QRE. Wikipedia's style is to nest things like challenges under a "Critiques" section. Just because the authors say "this is not meant as a critique" doesn't mean that it doesn't fit in such a section. If you understand the context, when they say "this is not a critique" they mean that the paper isn't meant as a claim of blowing up QRE as a concept. But, frankly, they *are* critiquing QRE. Why you think this disagreement gives you free range to vomit your self-citations all over this page again is beyond me. WeakTrain (talk) 04:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't recommend responding. They are clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia in a fair manner. That, and they are evading their block. Boomer VialHappy Holidays! • Contribs 04:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critiques
Talk:Henry Haversham Godwin-Austen

message: G-A was almost certainly born at Ogwell House, near Newton Abbot (or Abbott), not Teignmouth. The most important part of his education was at Sandhurst (1848-51). 
His greatest expedition took place in 1861: he nearly reached the new Mustagh Pass; he ascertained the exact position and height of K2 from a point above Urdukas above the Baltoro Glacier; he was the first Westerner to see the Hispar Glacier, from the Nushik La. 
G-A carried out further extensive explorations in Ladakh, Rupshu and Zanskar (1862), Western Tibet & the Aksai Chin (1863); Bhutan (1864-65) and, with interruptions because of bad health, throughout Manipur, Assam and Northern Burma from 1865 to 1877.
During his Karakoram expeditions, he broke the world high-altitude summit record on Mentok Kangri (Tso Moriri) (6283m)and reached peaks above 6000m four times, all of these achieved before the Matterhorn was climbed.
 
His geological collections are the basis of the collection in the National Museum of India. He was also a great conchologist, zoologist and ethnographer. His molluscs collection ,'forms the basis of all modern science in this subject'. (Quote by Professor Fred Naggs, Natural History Museum, South Kensington, London)
His personal bibliography extends to ten books and 174 scholarly papers.
He was, thus, one of the greatest British explorers ever.
Source: 'The K2 Man (and His Molluscs)' my biography (the first one, and authorized by the present G-A family), published by In Pinn, an imprint of Neil Wilson Publishing. Published October 2013.
Catherine Moorehead ~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.141.183 (talk) 11:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: The biographical article is still riddled with errors and omissions. For example, Sir Henry Thomas Godwin did not command the British forces in the first Anglo-Burmese war. But there are quite a number of other, perhaps more important mistakes. How on earth does one get these things corrected? source is my biography of Godwin-Austen: 'The K2 Man', based on family papers and scholarly sources such as the Royal Geographical Society, Bodleian, V & A et al.Katejsm (talk) 10:07, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see reply on your talk page. Moonraker (talk) 18:28, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 
Talk:Chevra

message: BS"D
Vus is dus, the Chevra redirects to a treifine indian food. A shondeh, whoever did this is a vilde chaya, ah meshugenah, a shlimiel, shlimazel, shmuck, shmendrick, part of the gantze goyishe oilom. wiki cherem should be instituted. --Shaul avrom 01:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ebonol (material)

message: I can find surprisingly little authoritative info about Ebonol. Most sources are simply quoting each other.
According to Edensaw Woods,
: Richlite is a very versatile material that is made from 100% recycled paper. Sheets of paper are layered and thermoset with a resin then pressed into solid panels of various thickness and colors. Heat and water resistant, this exceptional material can be used inside the home or workplace or outside as structural cladding. Fully machinable, Richlite can be drilled, tooled and CNC'd. Richlite is a sustainable choice for designers and architects. (http://www.edensaw.com/MainSite/Store1/Store/CategoryHome/736) 
This makes it sound like Ebonol but using recycled paper.
--Weeb Dingle (talk) 17:50, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richlite 

message: I can't quite figure a way to mention paper composite panels, the only WP article that mentions Richlite. 
--Weeb Dingle (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a "see also" section, with a link to Richlite, which currently redirects to paper composite panels. However, the article is so stubby, the old copper-dip-process stuff already having been merged somewhere else, the  remains should probably just be merged into the much more in-depth paper composite panels, and any further improvement done there. --BjKa (talk) 17:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to [[paper composite panels]]
Talk:Severn River (Georgian Bay)

message: what is the natural outlet of this river? 
every description I see of it ends with the Marine Railway, which may be relevant for navigators but is not hydrologically correct 
the current description would be like claiming Lake Erie drains into Lake Ontario via the Welland Canal while omitting any mention of Niagara Falls
J Edward Malone (talk) 14:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anesthesia Care Team

message: Ok
This is a direct paste and the reference given. This is common knowledge and not copy written by any person or group. The anesthesia care team isnt owned by this hospital. Do you need me to rewrite it all in my own words?Mmackinnon 01:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Nice try. Go spread lies somewhere else.Mmackinnon 03:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uptowner 

message: In the interest of a neutral addition which gives the reader a realistic view of the working conditions between MDAs and CRNAs as opposed to the politically charged banter we get into here.Mmackinnon 19:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added the national Politics section 

message: Justify it here.Mmackinnon 20:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  If your making changes..... 

message: OK, I've only just found out this article exists. May I ask its purpose? What content will it provide that Anesthesia provision in the US does not? WjBscribe 01:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your quite right, I'd just like to keep the battlegrounds to a minimum :-). I don't think the coverage of ACTs here is likely to get any more detailed than that at Anesthesia provision in the US anytime soon. I'll think about formally proposing merging the two articles. But its not urgent. Comments welcome. WjBscribe 01:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll change this page to a redirect to Anesthesia provision in the US. That way the content of this talkpage is preserved and this page can become an article if latter users have enough to say about ACTs for it to be worth having a separate article. I am pleased that all parties are now cooperating. WjBscribe 04:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?
Talk:Simcoe County

message: Given it references the census profile, it looks like the area given is for the Census Division (which includes Barrie and Orillia), not the administrative unit (which does not). What's the area of of latter? How do you show both in the infobox? Tompw (talk) 12:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a problem throughout the articles on various counties and regions in Ontario, which are almost all based on the census divisions as opposed to the upper-tier municipalities. I'm not sure if Simcoe county has demographic information that would include land area, but if not then areas can be calculated using the GIS data supplied by most municipalities. - Floydian τ ¢ 14:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area is Census Division, not the administrative unit 

message: The link http://www.wasagasun.ca/wasagasun/article/62504 now redirects to https://www.simcoe.com/simcoecounty-news/. Unsure if other links in this article are affected. Finding the article referenced may be difficult, if it is even public still.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:B100:1600:162D:64B5:1E63:4242:8765 (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Rot
Talk:Margaret Archer

message: The following is CV not biography:
Degrees 
B.Sc.(Soc.), London, 1964.
Ph.D. London, 1967. 
(Thesis: The Educational Aspirations of English Working Class Parents: their formation and influence on children's school achievement). 
Post-Doctoral Study at Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Sorbonne, Paris, following the Doctorat du Troisième Cycle in the section 'Sciences Administratives'. 
Employment Record 
Christ's College, Cambridge (Supervisor) 1964-6
London School of Economics (Graduate Tutor) 1965-6
University of Reading (Lecturer) 1966-73
University of Warwick (Reader) 1973-79
University of Warwick (Professor) 1979 to date
President, International Sociological Association 1986-90. 
Past University Duties (Administrative) 
Chairperson of Department 
Professor Responsible for Staff
Member of Board of Faculty of Social Studies
Member of Interdisciplinary Research Committee
Member of Professorial Promotions Committee
Member of Accommodation Committee
Member of Promotions Committee
Member of Advisory Boards for CRER and CEDAR
Chair of Chaplaincy Advisory Committee 
Richard Pinch (talk) 09:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: CV material
Talk:Wen-Chi

message: The Mongols didn't come into existence until about a thousand years later, so they clearly can't have abducted her. Even less so the Mongolians, which took another 700 years. Needless to say that Inner Mongolia also didn't happen quite yet at the time of those events... Someone may want to look up the Xiongnu or maybe the Huns as more likely candidates. --Latebird 02:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Mongolians
Talk:Kirkman's schoolgirl problem

message: I would like to point out that a sentence in the Wikipedia page "Kirkman's schoolgirl problem" is incorrect. 
It is in the fourth paragraph of the "History" section:
"In 1850, Kirkman posed the 15 schoolgirl problem, which would become much more famous than the 1847 paper he had already written. (...) However, in publishing his solutions to the schoolgirl problem, Kirkman neglected to refer readers to his own 1847 paper, and this omission would have serious consequences for invention and priority as seen below."
It is incorrect to say that Kirkman neglected to refer to his 1847 paper. Indeed, in his 1850 paper "On the triads made with fifteen things", where he published his first solution, he wrote: "I obtained this property of the triads made with fifteen things four years ago, by observing that, if you substitute in Q_15, at page 195 of the second volume, N. S. of the Cambridge and Dublin Mathematical Journal, (...)". 
Here Kirkman was referring precisely to his 1847 paper "On a problem in combinations", published in The Cambridge and Dublin Mathematical Journal, volume II.
147.163.24.107 (talk) 13:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: New post

message: 《Pithy Formula 124 》
———————————————
1 2 4,   2 3 5,  3 4 6,  4 5 7,   5 6 1,  6 7 2,  7 1 3  ：7
2 3 5,  3 4 6,  4 5 7,  5 6 1,   6 7 2,   7 1 3,  1 2 4   ：6
3 4 6,  4 5 7,   5 6 1,   6 7 2,   7 1 3,   1 2 4,  2 3 5  ：5
4 5 7,  5 6 1,   6 7 2,   7 1 3,   1 2 4,   2 3 5,  3 4 6   :4 
5 6 1,  6 7 2,  7 1 3,  1 2 4,   2 3 5,   3 4 6,  4 5 7  ：3
6 7 2,  7 1 3,   1 2 4,   2 3 5,   3 4 6, 4 5 7,5 6 1   :2
7 1 3,  1 2 4,   2 3 5,   3 4 6,  4 5 7,  5 6 1,   6 7 2    :1
———————————————
       1   2  4.                   OOO
       2’ 3’ 5        =           XXO
       3  4’ 6‘                    OXX
       5’ 6  1’                    XOX
———————————————
   124,  235,  346,  457,  561,  672, 713     
 2’3’5,3’4’6,4’5’7,5’6’1,6’7’2,7’1’3,1’2’4
 34’6’,45’7’,56’1’,67’2’,71’3’,12’4’,23’5’
 5’61’,6’72’,7’13’,1’24’,2’35’,3’46’,4’57’
   77’0,    11’0,    22’0,    33’0,  44’0,   55’0,    66’0 
———————————————
    1’=8,  2’=9,  3’=A,  4’=B,  5’=C, 6’=D,  7’=E, 0=F  
      124    235    346    457     561    672    713            
      9A5    AB6    BC7    CD1     DE2    E83    894
      3BD    4CE    5D8    6E9     78A    19B    2AC
      C68    D79    E1A    82B     93C    A4D    B5E
      7EF    18F    29F    3AF     4BF    5CF    6DF 
——by Liang Haisheng 2019 183.177.128.238 (talk) 13:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minimalist solution to Kirkman's schoolgirl problem
Talk:Anna Vyrubova

message: Needs discussion of her lesbianism  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.88.37.26 (talk) 16:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs discussion of her lesbianism 

message: Vyrubova was born in Moscow, says the "Early Life" section. Born 16 July 1884, Oranienbaum, Russian Empire, that's in the template. Which one is the true birthplace of Ms. Vyrubova then? Bennó (talk) 22:39, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born in Moscow or in Oranienbaum?
Talk:McKenzie Arena

message: Hi, I proposed the merger...the reasons being:
* Both pages are about the exact same arena.
I proposed the directionality of merging  into McKenzie Arena because:
* That's the proper spelling of the name.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.16.59.225 (talk) 02:12, February 11, 2007
Done.  --fuzzy510 02:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cedric Howell

message: There is a discrepancy between the dates given in different sources (9 or 10 December) for the aircraft's departure from Taranto and, therefore, the date of Howell's and Fraser's subsequent drowning. It appears from the preponderance of sources that the aircraft left on 9 December 1919 CET. This is the date given for Howell's and Fraser's deaths on the Australian War Memorial Commemorative Roll and Roll of Honour respectively. Other sources (eg  and ) give 10 December 1919 as the relevant date. If this reflects a difference in time zones then, according to the Wikipeda Manual of Style, perhaps the 9 December ought to be preferred, as the date and time appropriate to the place where the event occurred. On the other hand, I can see that - in principle - it might complicate age at death calculations not to use the same time frame as the person's place of birth.
Does anyone have any ideas? Todowd (talk) 18:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death: 9 or 10 December 1919? 
Talk:River Stour, Worcestershire

message: Should this really have a Transport in Worcs navbox? It's a non-navigable river and the banks are not very accessible to walkers.Sjwells53 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The Suffolk Stour rhymes with hour, not with tour. Can't speak for the others Crawiki (talk) 13:22, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Danzel

message: Why do all the "Singles" subsections of this article refer to the poseur Danzel repeatedly as either an "English DJ" or British DJ" when it's clear he's from Belgium?  Anyway, it's also clear he's a talentless ape, but that might be construed as POV (though it isn't) and I honestly can't be bothered.  If someone who likes Danzel (god knows why) wishes to fix these errors, please go ahead.  I only came to this page for info on a track he merely (and ineptly) covered, so I doubt I'll ever have need to look at this toss again. - Lontano 02:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The chart positions for 'Jump', which looked astonishingly to the point of ridiculously high (a top ten hit around the world) were added back in 2007 by an anon IP who made incorrect edits to a few other articles, inc this one. I've removed them all as there's no source and they didn't seem accurate. BillyH 15:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jump
Talk:Bundle map

message: A new article - sorry if it is a bit rough. I lost my first attempt by closing my web browser by mistake, so I was less patient than usual... Geometry guy 02:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad I'm not the only one that happens to ;)  Fropuff 02:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  :) And thanks for tidying up some of the rough edges. Geometry guy 02:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I was following along with the lecture series "Lectures on the Geometric Anatomy of Theoretical Physics", given by Dr. Frederic P. Schuller and freely available on YouTube. In Lecture 6, when he introduces bundle maps (about 50 minutes in), he does not include the requirement that they are continuous. I also don't see that condition included here http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BundleMap.html. I have been unable to find other information on the topic in my brief attempt at research (it doesn't help that the article lists no references), and was wondering if someone can clarify for me. Did Dr. Schuller simply forget to say the word continuous? Or is there some reasoning for intentionally leaving it out? Are both definitions used, and it simply depends on the author?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:2A80:6600:4D4D:A585:85E5:F50F (talk) 01:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must bundle maps always be continuous? 

message: "In other words, \varphi is fiber-preserving, and f is the induced map on the space of fibers of E: since \pi_E is surjective, f is uniquely determined by \varphi."
This sentence is confusing. It's not clear what is meant by "the induced map on the space of fibers of E". First off, I think it should say "the induced map from M\to N." Second, what exactly is the induced map? I can see that IF \varphi is fiber-preserving THEN there exists a unique induced map f. But, as written, the definition of a bundle map does not have "fiber-preserving" as a strict condition. Rather, from the given definition, it is a straightforward theorem/corollary that bundle maps are fiber preserving.
I think the paragraph could be reworked:
"The map \varphi is fiber-preserving, that is, if x \in \pi_E^{-1}(m) Then \varphi(x) \in \pi_F^{-1}(f(m)). A bundle map \varphi is said to be a bundle map covering f. If only a map \varphi:E\to F is given which is both continuous and fiber-preserving, then, because \pi_E is surjective, a map f_{\varphi}:M\to N is uniquely induced by \varphi such that \varphi is a bundle map covering f_{\varphi}."
Twistar48 (talk) 19:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Induced Map?
Talk:Parry Sound District

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Bolger station. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 20#Bolger station until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bolger station" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace

message: I removed stuff about some plagiarism because it stated it is supported by no one but the claimant. -kdonovan11  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.161.130.57 (talk) 04:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Plagiarism Claims 

message: I'm thinking of removing "His response was 'we all get older and smarter'".  In the context of how he is cited, I think it grossly misrepresents the idea of the quote.  At this point in the wiki article, I strongly felt as if he retracted his declaration and ideas in it, even when the previous sentence states that this refers to his optimism; again in that context, optimism seems more like meaning "naïvety of the idea" instead of what he really means in the full Reason Magazine article from which he is quoted:
To clarify, in that article, he hasn't abandoned the idea, his optimism was in regard to not implicating oneself too much with politics (because he was seeing it as basically too much work for what you could get out of it) and instead try to bypass it.  But now he sees his (social) libertarian ideas more in danger with how the general situation has evolved since ten years (DMCA, Patriot Act, etc) that he now sees mingling with politics a more imperative avenue than he considered before.  His optimism refer specifically to the original idea that by doing their things and trying to bring into light issues without engaging head on into the political, this "political" eventually would just "see the light" and things would "sort themselves out".  That was the optimism he was talking about, as clearly explained in the Reason Article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.81.15.136 (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misquoting 

message: As an influential writing that, early on, defined one prominent stance on the philosophy of cyberspace law, this article should be expanded upon. The Declaration itself goes into more depth than is explained in the section discussing its content, and there could certainly be more analysis on the future implications of the writing, where it has been mentioned/cited/used, other related works that it gave rise to, and its relationship with current cyberlaw. Also, the introduction could be expanded to give a brief but substantial summary of the Declaration. --Psykonautiks (talk) VM 01:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding more detail

message: Wikipedia:Nations and Wikipedia is a new meta page to accumulate and help organize ways nations/governments and Wikipedia interact and for the Wikipedia community to establish relevant policies and guidelines. It is somewhat related to this declaration but is not meant to block nations from participating in cyberspace but to make sure they participate constructively etc. I thought you might be interested in this page. Please share your thoughts on it on its talk page.
--Fixuture (talk) 13:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New relevant page on Nations and Wikipedia