Talk:Knox-class frigate

message: I had the pleasure? of doing reserve duty on these last three tin cans. Sorry I have no more to contribute at this time. H2O 21:10, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2004 

message: The 'Description' section covers a large amount of information, that would benefit from having it's own subsection. For example 'Role', 'Capabilities', 'Action' etc. ShockwaveLover (talk) 16:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Knox-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070608145222/http://www.emeraldesigns.com:80/matchup/destroyer.htm to http://www.emeraldesigns.com/matchup/destroyer.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Knox-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090601185336/http://www.destroyerhistory.org/coldwar/knoxclass.html to http://www.destroyerhistory.org/coldwar/knoxclass.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725231704/http://destroyerhistory.org/coldwar/knoxclass/ to http://destroyerhistory.org/coldwar/knoxclass/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Section originally unsigned - created 2008, shockwaver lover (by looking at history''''
1) I thought the "mack" (mast - stack) was fairly prominent on this type, and worthy of mention
Agree.
2) McNamara's folly - the cited article mentions concerns about the reliability of a single-screw design, not the speed. 27 knots seems like a pretty good clip for escorting a convoy (WWII era corvette was maybe 16 knots I think)
More the size - and seems like much less weapons compare to an Adams Class DDG or a WWII Destroyer. 
3) Also I thought the gun criticism related to the single-gun concept, rather than the 5-inch size
Agree.
4) Not sure what a "pressure fired" boiler is - can someone link or explain? Was the design change to reduce the boiler steam pressure, thereby resulting in a size increase? (I'm imaging a high pressure boiler develops more power in the same space as a lower pressure unit)
The Brooke and prior Garcia class had these. Normal boiler have fans, they had a supercharger- exhaust gas drove it air provided at a pressure. Same boiler water/ steam pressure. That design included automatic controls, Burner on Top, furnace space was a cylinder., MUCH less fire brick. Required cleaner fuel- NO black oil. Half the weight, same output. However, MUCH less forgiving to boiler water NO optimal conditions.  I need to dig out my old stuff find and scan the picture 
Wfoj3 (talk) 19:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: Page states 2 ships have been preserved - with NO Documentation. Recommend removal or provide some Documentation. Wfoj3 (talk) 21:23, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preserved Ship Status