Talk:Green League

message: "Vihreä Liitto is no longer a protest party or an alternative movement, but a respectable option for those young, well educated, urban voters in the south who cannot support SDP or the Conservatives (Kokoomus). Its blind spot are the rural countryside, particularly municipalities experiencing strong outward migration."
Ehm? Why it is such a respectable option? What does it drive that SDP or Kokoomus does not drive? As the article presents no information on this point, it is only fair that it is NPOV modified. Finlander 23:49, 7 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Prologue

message: :Image:Vihreä Liitto Logo Aug06.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Samulili (talk) 09:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Vihreä Liitto Logo Aug06.gif

message: The section is clearly in a non-NPOV tone, and should be rewritten. - Quirk (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, it's fixed - Quirk (talk) 10:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology section 

message: Why is Heidi Hautala mentioned as "president" of the party? I don't know what that even means in this context and the Finnish Wikipedia doesn't mention it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.250.242 (talk) 19:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The role of Heidi Hautala 

message: The representatives and MEPs may need to be updated following the movements in 2011. Heidi Hautala will return to be a minister. Her MEP seat probably taken by Jyrki Kasvi, as Cronberg is unlikely to return to active politics. – Kaihsu (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wrong: Tarja Cronberg will be there.  – Kaihsu (talk) 15:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parliamentary representatives 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Green League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131104210902/http://www.hs.fi/politiikka/artikkeli/Vihreiden+j%C3%A4senm%C3%A4%C3%A4r%C3%A4+kasvanut+r%C3%A4j%C3%A4hdysm%C3%A4isesti/1135267497920 to http://www.hs.fi/politiikka/artikkeli/Vihreiden+j%C3%A4senm%C3%A4%C3%A4r%C3%A4+kasvanut+r%C3%A4j%C3%A4hdysm%C3%A4isesti/1135267497920
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: What is Pentti Linkola's involvement with the Greens? Should he really be mentioned in the See also section?
Pessimistipasta (talk) 16:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentti Linkola? 

message: I don't think it necessarily has to go into the infobox. This is because Green liberalism itself contains social liberal elements. Mureungdowon (talk) 08:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Vacant0 (talk) 15:42, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mureungdowon and @Vacant0, the source itself states "green social liberalism". If only green liberalism was necessary then it would say that. Regardless we should stick to what the source says as much as possible. Therefore, I think both should be included. Helper201 (talk) 01:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd rather just keep "green politics" in the infobox considering that there are three citations that back up that ideology, in contrary to "green social liberalism" which is only backed up by one source. Vacant0 (talk) 10:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  you could add it to the ideology section Braganza (talk) 11:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social liberalism