lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Camp Stone

message: This page seems to me like an advertisement for camp stone. Anyone willing to clean it up? Leppi 12:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: Hi, 
I am not new to reading Wikipedia, but I am brand new to editing. I need help with my page "Camp Stone." I work for Camp Stone and I don't know how to make certain changes that my organization wants to make. Can we speak over the phone? If so, what is the best way to reach you? 
Thanks, Yakov Fleischmann 
--Yakfleisch (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello . For reasons of transparency, I prefer to discuss article content right here on Wikipedia. You should start by reading about conflict of interest on Wikipedia. Camp Stone has problems. It lacks references to significant coverage in reliable, independent sources needed to show notability. You should not edit the article yourself, but should furnish references and propose changes on the talk page. Let me know and I will review your proposed changes, and add them to the article, if they comply with our policies and guidelines. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: After reading the comments you left on two other editor's talk pages, you seem to have a serious misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is. Your organization does not control our article Camp Stone. This is not LinkedIn or Facebook. That is an encyclopedia article about the camp. It is not a promotional piece for the camp. Anyone can edit Wikipedia in compliance with our policies and guidelines, and they don't need the camp's permission. If the camp is in Pennsylvania, then it will be categorized as a camp in Pennsylvania. Explain all that to the camp leadership, and please declare your conflict of interest on your user page, which is currently blank. Thank you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need some help with my page - Camp Stone
Talk:Polish governments and their composition

message: I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions, which will hopefully lead to a consistent naming standard for national government cabinets/ministries. See Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions#Naming of government cabinets/ministries to take part in the discussion. /Slarre 12:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming standard for government cabinets/ministries
Talk:Triplanetary (board game)

message: I used to play Triplanetary (a lot!) when I was a kid - but I don't remember there being combat rules or all of those other scenarios.  I'm pretty sure there was only one kind of gravity field and there were no moons.
I made lots of extensions to the game (including orbiting moons and a way to make gravity fields of large planets extend out to two rings of hexagons and still permit orbits) - I also added my own combat system that seems to be much more complex than the one that the Triplanetary version described here uses.
Is it possible that there was an earlier and simpler version of the game out there?
SteveBaker (talk) 15:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this the only version? 

message: Attack Vector: Tactical has many similarities with Triplanetary.  Both are hex based space games that try to have realistic physics.  AV:T adds three dimensional space movement and targeting rules, as well as realistic inertial dynamics and quite a bit more detail into ship configuration.  Readers interested in Triplanetary are likely also interested in expansions of the concept: WP:BUILD.  -- Autopilot (talk) 13:10, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  AV:T
Talk:Callicarpa ampla

message: This needs to be edited and translated into idiomatic English Tusbra (talk) 13:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Not a word in his article about the berries. Are they edible, for birds, animals, humans? Other uses?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:D9B8:8D:73DB:6938 (talk) 20:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fruit?
Talk:Workforce productivity

message: @Tengo  190.14.134.141 (talk) 00:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

message: Labour productivity is the usual term for this. It's the one used in most of the sources. Any objections to moving this page and changing the terminology? Fedjmike (talk) 18:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Labour productivity
Talk:Manhattan Transfer

message: I once heard that a "Manhattan Transfer" was a sexual act involving one person shitting into a tube which is connected to someone else's anus, transferring fecal matter from one rectum to another. It's probably one of these fake disgusting non-existent sex acts like the donkey punch.-h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Caproni Ca.100

message: This aircraft has an uncowled radial engine.  No such power unit is mentioned in the text.  Are we sure it is  Ca.100?  It's hard to tell if it is an inverted sesquiplane from that angle.  I'll add a query to the imageTSRL (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah! Jane's Encyclopedia (cited) does say some had the "Fiat A50 uncowled radial".  It also mentions two inline engines although, oddly, not the Gipsy.  Further info may come from next AirBritain Archive.TSRL (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Turns out that there were several radials fitted, 2 with 7 cylinders and 1 with 5.  Our image is too poor to count them.TSRL (talk) 12:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox image

message: This plane was used by the Austrian republic until 1938, shouldn't Nazi Germany then be included among the users?76.10.134.241 (talk) 18:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no cite on the Austrian Air Force assertion so it may or may not be right. The longish piece in Air Britain Archive, cited, notes the Austrian Aero Club's use of 20 ex-Regia-Aeronatica Ca 100s but these had civil registrations OE-TxC with x= A, B ...V, excluding J and Q. Thompson's "Italian Civil and Military Aircraft" makes no mention of Austria in its Ca 100 section. So we would need more citable evidence.TSRL (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Austrian/Luftwaffe use?
Talk:Shady Grove (song)

message: Is it possible that the Harlan referred to in the song could be Harlan, Kentucky?
:Probably does refer to Harlan, KY. See also below, in "18th-century?" section, the word 'Ireland' as precedent to 'Harlan'.Acwilson9 (talk) 21:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Some versions of (purported) antecedent song "Matty Groves" refer to "Lord Arlan". Acwilson9 (talk) 22 October 2017 (UTC) Acwilson9 (talk) 03:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ["Harlan, Kentucky"]] 

message: There should be a list of all known versions of the song. I like it enough to do it myself, but I don't think it's as easy as that. (X24actor (talk) 22:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not practical.  As noted in article (and its history) somebody (unknown) at some time (unknown) counted about +/- 300 (unverified) variant stanzas.  And, per some (external) folk music listservs & blogs, more versions keep being created.  This very popular song lends itself to in-performance spur-of-moment doggerel, some of it risque or obscene, some of which might then appear on youtube, etc. Acwilson9 (talk) 23:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: all known versions

message: Added template Acwilson9 (talk) 23:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "WikiProject Songs" template
Talk:Brasofensine

message: It says in the article that Brasofensine is a class A drug, and gives this as a reference. But I can't find Brasofensine there, or find any other info on it being class A so I'm removing that,.--193.128.72.68 (talk)acutally i found it but under a different name, i'm asking the guy who originally added it. also, anyone know why it might be class a?
:That document on which brasofensine is listed (albeit under a slightly incorrect chemical name!) was issued by the UK Home Office who can be considered the definitive source for which drugs are legal or illegal in the UK. However I have not been able to find any other official announcement of brasofensine being scheduled or why. As an aside, that document is riddled with misspellings and double and even triple entries, and contains numerous compounds for which the abuse potential is rather questionable (2-methoxyphenethylamine for instance!!), so the reason why certain phenyltropane stimulants like brasofensine and RTI-55 have been listed, yet others like CPT and CFT have been left off the list, is anyone's guess really. See arbitrary Meodipt (talk) 04:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  class a drug?
Talk:High-temperature gas-cooled reactor

message: My field is Electronic Engineering so I am not really an expert.  My understanding is that there is a distinction between a HTGR such as the prototype built at Fort Saint Vrain Colorado that used steam generators and steam turbines (Rankine cycle) for power generation and a VHTGR such as the new proposal from General Atomics that use the gas coolant directly to drive a gas turbine (Brayton cycle).  Combined cycle would also be possible for the VHTGR.
Tyrerj (talk) 15:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: High Temperature vs. Very High Temperature

message: Can this (very high temperature reactor) be used as a breeder reactor?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.241.21.7 (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breeder reactor 

message: Outlet temperatures in the table are as low as 700C. The UK's CO2 AGR fleet has outlet temperatures of 640C. That's lower, but not that much, and its still double that of a typical water-cooled design. The lede states that VHTGRs are 750 and up, so it would seem (assuming that's accurate) that HTGRs overlap and have some lower lower bound. So what is the definition that makes one a HTGR and the other a M(medium)TGR? Maury Markowitz (talk) Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is AGR not a HTGR?
Talk:Point San Pablo Harbor

message: I'm about to be bold and merge the content at Point San Pablo here, and I assume this will be uncontroversial. Point San Pablo is a geographic feature. The community is the harbor. For example, see here. (I'd link to GNIS but as I write this the U.S. government is shut down.) Also, per WP:COMMONNAME, the community is known as Point San Pablo Yacht Harbor. For example, see here, here, here, here, and here. Brycehughes (talk) 03:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Allt-yr-yn

message: Isn't this area typically called "Gold Tops" in English? This might cast some doubt on the etymology, c.f. the Welsh name for Goldcliff which is given as Allteuryn. Also see the etymology for the Welsh name for Nash, which is Trefonnen? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold Tops
Talk:Girl All the Bad Guys Want

message: I don't think at the end of the video, it is actually the three members from Slipknot in the video. If you look more closely at the masks, you can plainly see it is not the masks they used at that time. If it was them in the video, there needs to be some kind of proof. Not sure how, but yeah. --Byaku Kitsune (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Slipknot members in vid?

message: It says clearly in the article that Butch Walker was the only writer, but on the sidebar it says they both wrote it. Which one is right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.224.250 (talk) 06:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Writers
Talk:Wiedersehen pair

message: I ran a Google scholar search on "Wiedersehen", and found this reference to a paper:
*
I don't have any easy way to check this paper, to see if it's right. But the claim made in the title implies that half of the "Blaschke conjecture" is no longer a conjecture, and that the only cases left open are even dimensions greater than 3. Can somebody check this out?  DavidCBryant 14:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only that, I notice that the page for Jerry Kazdan mentions "the Berger–Kazdan comparison theorem, which was a key step in the proof of the Blaschke conjecture and the classification of Wiedersehen manifolds." So I'm not sure what the situation is. We need more mathematicians editing Wikipedia! 0x30114 (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't resist looking into this more. Wiedersehen manifolds are definitely classified (they're just spheres), and the Blaschke conjecture for the wiedersehen case is settled. (I've edited the article to reflect this.) The larger Blaschke conjecture regarding Blaschke manifolds is more complicated and is still open as far as I can tell. 0x30114 (talk) 02:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Blaschke conjecture
Talk:Artus Van Briggle

message: I certainly have no problem with the trend toward not allowing commercial sites to use wiki as a spam platform.
However, many commercial sources are used when they are obviously also legitimate sources of expert information. (Example: The Chicago Tribune is a commercial web site, yet a legitimate source of wiki information)
The links to free information and history pages on the commercial web site Just Art Pottery Just Art Pottery is another such example. The owner of the site is widely known as an enthusiastic collector of American Art Pottery, is very generous with information, is sought after as a public speaker on pottery, and is willing to help anyone who has questions about pottery. Yes, he sells pottery. That is not a crime. He is also an invaluable, reliable, expert resource on this topic.
I feel strongly that the links to the Just Art Pottery information pages should be restored (they were deleted). There is a fine line between blocking spam links, and having a knee-jerk anti-business bias.  VanBrigglePottery 18:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of commercial link
Talk:Gangsta Gangsta

message: I cant find any refs, so wot do we do? - keep it real - Real Compton G 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its ok, we dont have to have refs, its just better and it could be challenged. Look on Hiphopvinyl.de for info. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 10:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No Refs
Talk:Capparis sandwichiana

message: Pua pilo - pua looks straightforward; flower/flowerhead/plant.
Maiapilo - IONO. mai'a (Musa spp.) perhaps? Cf. analogy between "banana poka" Passiflora mollissima and Musa. P. mollissima and Capparis have fruit which look superficially similar enough.
Leaves pilo. Pukui/Elbert (pocket) has stuff like stinking swamps and bad breath that are pilo. "Mud" and "swamp" yield no backref to pilo, and "stink" does not exist. IONO again; capers might be rather funky to the inexperienced palate. I don't guess someone has ever tsted these things and is willing to discuss it (I don't think it would be legal either). Maybe that particular species DOES give you bad breath. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 05:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maiapilo or pua pilo

message: Originally Native Caper was listed as a name for this plant, but that is extremely ambiguous. There about 50 species of caper, and they all have to be native somewhere.  It is the name used by the USDA, for example, so making Native Caper redirect here is not a bad idea.--TDogg310 (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Native Caper
Talk:Poiseuille's law

message: Could somebody add how it's the name pronounced? (IPA code) 213.98.180.215 14:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I think it's pronounced approximately pwah-zoy.
I agree with the comments about L, s, and "tricks".
The derivation given here seems to me unnecessarily complicated. It proceeds by equating to zero the net force on a thin cylindrical shell of radius r. This necessitates computing the viscous force of the fluid both inside and outside the shell, and yields a second order differential equation for the velocity as a function of radius v(r). A simpler way to proceed is to equate to zero the net force on a SOLID cylinder of radius r, on the grounds that in steady flow the center of mass of this cylinder is not accelerating. (The fact that there are internal viscous forces in this cylinder is irrelevant, since they cancel thanks to Newton's third law.) Then the only viscous force on the cylinder is from the fluid outside it. This yields directly a first order differential equation for v(r). The derivation goes like this, using the same notation as the present article:
The net pressure force is -(Delta p)(pi r^2), while the next viscous force is eta v'(r) 2pi r Delta x. The sum must vanish, so v'(r) = (1/2 eta)(Delta p/Delta x) r. Viola! The solution is  v(r) = -(1/4 eta)|Delta p/Delta x| r^2 + v(0), where I took into account the fact that p is decreasing with x to replace (Delta p/Delta x) by -|Delta p/Delta x|.  Setting v(R)=0 then yields v(0)=(1/4 eta)|Delta p/Delta x| R^2, so v(r) = (1/4 eta)|Delta p/Delta x| (R^2 - r^2).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.164.50.50 (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ====
Template talk:Mod

message: Why don't use --SunnyChow
:The m:ParserFunctions modulus division is very 'non standard' in comparison to how modulus division works in most programming languages and mathematics texts. This template was created to mimic the more usual calculations. Specifically, the #expr will truncate both operands to whole numbers before performing the modulus division while this template uses the un-truncated values. For example;
:: = 
:: = 
Either can be used for a particular calculation as needed, but the differences in processing needed to be considered. --CBD 12:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We should explain this in the doc rather than just stating that these are different (as the doc does now). JIMp talk·cont 01:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference from 'mod' expression
Talk:Citadel (disambiguation)

message: These entries were removed from the dab page because they refer to no existing articles in which they are treated:
* Citadel (French band), a French alternative and progressive rock band, formed in 2002
* Citadel (band), an American musical group, founded in the late seventies, who are most known for their release The Citadel of Cynosure & Other Tales and for co-founding and presenting the first ProgFest, in Los Angeles in 1993
* Citadel Records, an Australian independent record label
* The Citadel building (La Ciudadela) in Mexico City, an important site of the Mexican Revolution during the "Ten Tragic Days" (Decena Tragica) of 1913
--ShelfSkewed Talk 14:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks 

message: A couple of links to articles which did not have Citadel in the title were removed, including a Salvation Army link to an apparently orphaned stub that distracts from their main page. The one specific Salvation Army citadel with a Wikipedia article was added.  Two "places" were more correctly organizations, and therefore moved. All links were alphabetized in each category. There can be only one link per entry. A couple of secondary links were removed. The Spanish equivalent Ciudadela is added to the translations. Citadel Records has a genuine link now, and was added back. 128.141.230.233 (talk) 20:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates
Talk:American Brewery (building)

message: This building is an important historical and cultural icon in Baltimore. I'd like to add a lot more information here as I have time. There is a revitalization effort underway as well in the surrounding East Baltimore neighborhood, with the Brewery building set for renovation to house a human services/job creation center. Ajacksb 14:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yo, yo, I gotz me a pic of the new Brew'ry, dawg.  I'll upload it in a bit.  --Onore Baka Sama (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lolcode

message: :Lolcode has been redirected to LOLCODE. Please post all future talk about this article at Talk:LOLCODE. -- Jreferee (Talk) 14:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

message: C'mon! This deserves a Article, LOLCODE was even mentioned in Linux.com -
121.247.185.154 13:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Saying that it's a "recognized programming language" is overstating the case, but this is a valid example of another esoteric programming language, if not one that is particularly interesting beyond its amusement value.  kraemer 18:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOLCODE 

message: Why not have this be a protected redirect to Lolcat? It would still keep people from recreating it, and it would be at least somewhat useful, whereas the deletedpage template isn't. --Rory096 05:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: similar discussion here. I think that this subject is a good example of something encyclopedic that would be in our scope, except that it's almost too early to tell. I hate to say WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but most other articles about esoteric languages have only external links to specs/discussion groups for the language, and maybe one or two links to a self-published source referring to the language. GracenotesT § 06:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: I have started a deletion review, because I feel that over the past six weeks enough has happened with Lolcode to void the previous AfD-debate. The language now receives about 750,000 Google-hits (whereas Malbolge receives only 20,000), and there is a definition of Lolcode v1.0.
Please go to Wikipedia:Deletion review and post your opinions.
HymylyT@C 20:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion review 

message: This page was redirected to Image macro as part of a unilateral merge, which turned out to be against consensus. Could it be re-redirected towards Lolcat? GracenotesT § 04:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: by Ryulong. GracenotesT § 05:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I is in ur articles makin ur protected editz. — Carl (CBM · talk) 01:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request 

message: Prod tag added.  This is a fake programming language based on a joke web page, no more.  Tempshill 15:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to be unfamiliar with the concept of an esoteric programming language, which Wikipedia covers encyclopedically. This does not look like a joke to me. Most fake programming languages don't have compilers and interpreters written by many people using multiple frameworks. On top of that, lolcode is mentioned by a reliable source—while perhaps not notable enough for an article, a brief section should be fine. GracenotesT § 22:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod tag added