lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Earned media

message: I reduced the article to a stub and rewrote it. It was basically a hype piece for earned media PR and the article was about 65% written by two SPA's each of which had significant red flags or policy violations associated with the content:
* @SKRBL edited the article in 2014 to add the examples table.  It was blatant WP:COPYVIO from this article
* @112.196.158.19 added the same three examples (Shave Club, Oxford dictionary, Assam Tea) to three marketing-related articles and has never edited again. Assam Tea got 8 source and the others only one each. The IP address resolves to New Delhi, India. This has strong suggestions of UPI.  Perhaps there would be a role for these examples in a more balanced article.
Because of the copyright violation issue, I felt this was not a matter of discretion; the article needed to be changed and I tried to keep it readable and useful. If anyone feels I've overstepped, feel free to comment.
Oblivy (talk) 06:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantially Rewritten
Talk:Don't Bother

message: Is this song based on a true story in Shakira's life?  If so, it should be stated. Brusselsshrek 12:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  True story? 

message: Why is this song classed as New Wave/ Britpop, it definitely doesn't seem to me that it fits either of these genres. Stevvvv4444 (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Song genre
Talk:Freedom Toaster

message: This article reads like bad press copy. Doing some quick internet research, it seems like an interesting concept, so I'm going to attempt to rewrite it from scratch. Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit" 00:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I vote "yes to merge Freedom Toaster and The Freedom Toaster.
Even though Shuttleworth may have invented the term and promoted the concept, if it is to be a generic term, then his original Freedom Toasters are only the first example of a Freedom Toaster. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Physadvoc (talk • contribs).
:Thanks for merging :) --Quiddity 21:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I vote "yes" to merge Freedom Toaster and The Freedom Toaster 

message: Horrible name. -andy 84.149.96.223 07:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sounds "Orwellian" to me 

message: Can someone living near a Freedom Toaster make a picture and place it on here? --Stephanvaningen (talk) 11:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: A history without dates is curious.  Technology changes, without dates it is difficult to tell whether this is still relevant. Fholson 11:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates please 

message: The first link (spacetoaster.co.za) is not working, it says the host is suspended. 2601:645:8001:F586:9097:EDC0:3F87:D64C (talk) 01:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 
Talk:Western Block Party

message: including reference to Christie's defence of Holocaust deniers is relevant here because:
# Christie is the founder of the party;
# Christie is the leader of the party;
# Holocaust-denial is very much a "fringe" perspective, like Western separatism; and
# it helps explain why the WBP and the Western Canada Patty are unlikley to merge as an anon editor suggested above: the latter is unlikely to want to risk being seen as extremist by associating with Christie.
Ground Zero | t 21:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Christie's defence of Holocaust deniers

message: [Their] official logo with Elections Canada is a bit different. Pete Peters 22:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: So what is this parties plan should they ever succeed in regards to the monarchy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamhaw (talk • contribs) 22:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Monarchy
Talk:Satam al-Suqami

message: Just a brief note - made this change because the previous text had left me with the implication that the passport had been doctored for some nefarious purpose by someone who had presumably planted it, which is not in fact what the 9/11 report says. thither 05:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: her statement wasn't sourced, so I'm going to try a bit of a compromise - let me know if you think it needs further work, or could be worded still better. Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 05:36, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

text: No. DRK 20:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

text: That caused me confusion as well: "An FAA memo... claimed that al-Suqami stabbed passenger Daniel Lewin ... [However,] the report has been a matter of some controversy, since both the FAA and FBI have strongly claimed that there were no firearms smuggled aboard." Where did this come from? It needs to be changed one way or the other (ie. Lewin shot OR no weapons/knives smuggled aboard). Seadrifter 04:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it, if you check earlier versions of the page, it did indeed say "shot" (as does the FAA memo), some vandal quietly changed it to "stab" and it went unnoticed. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  15:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2006

message: That statement that Suqami and Ahmed al-Ghamdi were "tied" to a foiled 2000 millennium attack plots needs a reference. Otherwise this should be deleted. A significant claim like that needs a source.203.184.41.226 (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millenium plot 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Satam al-Suqami (Templat) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 14:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Satam al-Suqami (Templat)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hamza al-Ghamdi

message: Any chance at a birthdate? Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 13:24, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2006
Talk:Clan Macrae

message: I recognise my clan badge all right, but is there any authority for these arms?
 
In most heraldry arms are borne by an individual, not a whole clan;
and in Scottish heraldry I believe you refer to a star, not a mullet.
Fortitudine! Jezzabr 00:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious Arms?

message: I think the article ought to be moved to Clan Macrae. This is how the name is listed on the Standing Council of Scottish Chiefs website . Same with the 'official' clan website .--Celtus (talk) 10:39, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A recent anonymous edit has raised again the issue whether "Macrae" should be "MacRae". I am in favour of the former but, whatever the answer, I think the importance of consistency with the article title and with other clan articles is such that "Macrae" should not be changed to "MacRae" in the absence of broad consensus.45ossington (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Glenn Cowan

message: How did he die? He was a young man. Surely this should be included in the article?
:It's sad that he died young. According to the article by Tim Boggan (given in External Links), he died of some illness. Zhuang Zedong called to convey his condolence, according to Boggan. --Roland 08:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He died at 51, not at 52 as is mentioned later. Cbockermann (talk) 19:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:GMA Network

message: Can we split the History section of GMA Network to History of GMA Network to be the same with History of ABS-CBN? SeanJ 2007 (talk) 06:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting of History section 

message: Gma 136.158.8.87 (talk) 14:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math 

message: Please add new update of the ABS-CBN and GMA Network series which will be streamed on Viu in 15 territories. It became official on January 23, 2022 and not November 11, 2022. 
https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/01/23/23/gma-abs-cbn-announce-collab-to-co-produce-unbreak-my-heart 122.54.102.0 (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Colonestarrice (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2023 

message: Please add update on the history section that it is officially announced not on November 11, 2022 but on January 23, 2023 that abs cbn and gma network made a collab to co produce Unbreak My Heart and will stream on Viu in 15 international territories.
https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/01/23/23/gma-abs-cbn-announce-collab-to-co-produce-unbreak-my-heart - official source. 122.54.102.0 (talk) 01:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: the claim that it was announced on November 11, 2022 is backed up by the source given in the article. That source was published before January 23, 2023, so unless you mean that the collaboration was leaked before the official announcement, your date cannot be correct. small jars tc 16:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2023
Talk:Nur-Pashi Kulayev

message: This section was written by a user that has a history of introducing deception into articles and is now banned.  Furthermore it has absolutely no references or verifiable facts.  The section states that the man was conscripted into the Red Army in 1991 when the man was then 11 according to simple math.  The age of conscription in the red army is a minimum of 18 so this this blatantly false.  I deleted this section and if anyone can verify any of the facts, feel free to put it back because I can't. papile
:The section says his older brother was conscripted in 1991, please read carefully.  Which user are you referring to as being banned? Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  06:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recruitment Section
Talk:Pennington, South Australia

message: I tried to update pennington’s population from 2006 to 2016, But when I added the 2016 census link (Outside), It broke the whole page, Causing the code to appear, Can somebody help revert this or fixing this? Waterfronteer (talk) 03:46, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Waterfronteer I reverted all your edits on this page for now. You may want to ask any questions at teahouse. It's okay, everyone makes mistakes when they are new to Wikipedia. Cheers Krutarth (talk) 06:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing error while trying to update the page
Category talk:Newspapers published in Hong Kong

message: This keeps getting reversed (by User:Instantnood), so I'm opening discussion here.
According to the article Hong Kong, this former British colony is now officially part of China.  You may recall some news coverage from 1997 to that effect.  As such, Hong Kong categories should be included as subcategories of China categories where they exist. Cleduc 00:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it's very true that its sovereignty was transferred to the PRC in 1997, yet it is not administratively incorporated into the PRC, and it is distinctive from other first-order administrative divisions of the PRC. I agree the Hong Kong category would better be both subcategory of the by country category, as well as the category for the PRC. Nevertheless, it should not be grouped under a mainland China-specific category. — Instantnood 17:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Like many other similar categories, this category has been mainland China-specific since its creation. Its nature as mainland China-specific is little disputed until some users like user:Huaiwei resisted to rename it as :category:newspapers of mainland China   (or equivalent) to  better reflect its nature. (They have in fact block the creation of anything that contains the term "mainland China".) If the name change is approved, there's nothing wrong to group the mainland China-specific, the Hong Kong and Macau categories all under the category for the PRC, and to group the PRC category under the general Chinese category, together with the ROC category. The general Chinese category would then be useful to categorise newspapers that were only published before the ROC and the PRC were founded. — Instantnood 12:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "the Hong Kong and Macau categories all under the category for the PRC". Why then do you resist the formation of PRC categories and having both HK and Macau cats under it?--Huaiwei 13:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never resisted to do so as long as the Chinese/PRC categories are not mainland China-specific, and, for some cases, mainland China-specific categories are created. — Instantnood 14:33, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh really? PRC cats will be "mainland specific" so long that you keep trying to remove the SARS from them. Please explain your hypocrisy.--Huaiwei 14:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They aren't mainland China-specific if they're the parent categories for the mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau categories. — Instantnood 15:08, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And they are not if they are for PRC entries plus categories for HK and Macau?--Huaiwei 15:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For some topics it's necessary to have a mainland China-specific subcategory. — Instantnood 16:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And if it is not?--Huaiwei 16:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pardon? — Instantnood 16:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Chinese newspapers]]
Talk:Chief of the Air Staff (United Kingdom)

message: The final paragraph
The present air threat to the United Kingdom itself is minimal compared with any time since the early 1930s. The RAF has therefore had to be reoriented to be an expeditionary force. The struggles against cuts continue, with many feeling that the RAF and the Chief of the Air Staff go too far in their zealous defence of air power and control over air assets. Nevertheless, the Chief of the Air Staff is a secure post for the foreseeable future.
seems to relate more the question of whether the RAF should exist as an independent force rather than the exisitance of the post of CAS.  It might be better to include the above in a section on the main RAF page and shorten the entry in this page to focus on the future of the post of CAS.  Any thoughts? 88.105.128.238 00:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SOJA

message: Part of wikipedia's notability guidelines for music state as follows:
:"Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country, reported in reliable sources."
On the official website, it is stated that they will be touring "France, Belgium, and Switzerland" and have already toured South America . I believe in this respect that the one of the criterion for notability for musicians has been met. Zchris87v 19:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. I removed the piece about small countries from the guideline as I see no reason to discriminate against snmall copuntries, some rubbish inmplanted by someone from a big country. Big countriers dont get more rights on wikipedia, SqueakBox 19:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still, in respect to that, this at least establishes them as being notable. Zchris87v 06:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: This article is written like an advertisement and should be cleaned up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.204.112.102 (talk) 23:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written Like Ad 

message: Hi,
To Whom it may concern,
I would like to make a few edits to this page as I work in management for this band, and there are several inaccuracies that I would like to address / alter some wording to fit the band's history that is 100% verifiable.
I would also like to know what the boundaries are in terms of Copyright laws re: Wikipedia policy.
I look forward to hearing back from you.
Hunterwhite521 (talk) 00:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit 

message: * Thank you for your questions. Requests for changes to articles are usually posed in a "Change x to y using z" format. That format is spelled out below: 
 
	A verbatim description of the old text to be removed from the article (if any)
	A verbatim description of the new text to be added to the article (if any)
	A reference which verifies the requested change
Please change:
*The Sun's diameter is 25 miles.
to read as:
*The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles.
using as a reference:
* 
* Information on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines surrounding copyrights may be found at WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:CFAQ.
*Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed. 
Regards,  Spintendo  17:51, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 31-DEC-2019

message: I can't find any record of this band receiving an Oscar nomination. They do have a Grammy win (as of today) but I can't find any Oscar noms. If this is inaccurate, it should be removed. If it is true, perhaps talk more about it in the article, such as the song title and the film the song is from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.2.176 (talk) 01:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscar Nominated?
Talk:BMW M6

message: totally re-done to bring it up to standard.
Changed any references to ps to hp.  203.109.252.196
PS is standard units not HP. YCCHAN 19:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion are both pictures hideous.  -- Janadore 13:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Sounds pretty good. Thanks.-- Janadore 13:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: General points

message: I'm a BMW driver, but can anyone explain what the heading E24 M635CSi/M6 means? It looks like pure gobbledygook, what use would this heading be to a non-BMW M6 fan?  It's also a pretty dire way to start an article. Escaper7 08:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess a space would help. E24 M6 and 635CSi. YCCHAN 01:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a bit meaningless. Wouldn't M6 from 1983 followed by M6 from 2005 make more sense - the technical details, evolution numbers could be explained below each section. Escaper7 13:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

text: As far as I am aware, the 6 series in Europe with the 286 hp engine was called M635 CSi. There was, I beleive, an M6, which was a 635 CSi with "M" kit on it and only the 218hp engine. It's easy to get these two cars confused with each other. Furthermore, for the last 9 months or so of production, the M635 CSI was badged as simply M6, confusing matters further. The car was known as M6 in the USA. LewisR 18:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sub heading

message: Wasn't the BMW M1 a faster car? It had the same engine with a lower smaller frontal area.
LewisR 23:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  M635CSi fastest production model ever from BMW? 

message: When is comming the next generation of the M6, in 2011,2012 or 2013 ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.162.99.188 (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  next generation ? 

message: I noticed that this article needs to add citation, I have changed citation needed to a proper cite. Tianyu10 (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: citation

message: The 6 series was discontinued in 2017 (link, but I can’t seem to tell if this date was for the world, or only for the US.
Dave Rahardja 03:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Dave. Yes, the coupe models were discontinued worldwide in 2017 (link). But not the convertible and Gran Coupe models. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 23:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Discontinuation
Talk:Chalk and cheese

message: IME, 'chalk and cheese' is more often used in the sense of 'different' than 'incompatible'. Googling would seem to confirm this.
Also, 'oil and water' is not a particularly 'American' phrase; an appropriate Google search produces plenty of UK-based hits. --Calair 01:07, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Different, not incompatible

message: "Chalk and cheese" indicates complete fundamental dissimilarity, whereas "apples and oranges" indicates some broad similarities but also fundamental differences.  See the discussion at Talk: apples and oranges for more on this. -moritheilTalk 01:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to apples and oranges inappropriate
Talk:Cape Canaveral Light

message: The 137 foot value is definitely the focal plane, but I've found three different heights for the tower itself:
*LHF says 160 feet
*NPS says 145 feet
*USCG says 151 feet
I'm willing to throw out the LHF value as a round number but there's still the discrepancy between the other two. Mangoe (talk) 23:53, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How tall is this light, anyway? 
Talk:Pay and display

message: Can these two pages be merged? Or should we consider the later machines as an evolution of the first. This way, parking meter stands for the old style Duncan individual meters (one for each space or a double one for each pair of spaces, which is still the same: indivudal) and Pay and display machines for the colective meter, which serve a ticket for display on the dashboard.
The two names are perfect for both generations of these machines, but for historical reasons, in some countries, even in those where the individual meters have been fully replaced by the colective pay & display systems, they are still named after the meter, like in Portugal: parcómetros.
If both the page exists, this leaves us with the problem of where to write all the vandalism, theft considerations that have allready been writen future considerations about usage, enforcement, management, collection, operation, the industry, the techonlogy, etc...
I mean, I would really like to do so.
Andrezero 01:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parking meter vs. Pay and display machine 

message: Wow! This page really hits you; two pictures on either side? Think outside the box 12:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed those two images and added one which shows "pay and display" better. Think outside the box 12:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Why is "pay and display machine" not spelled "pay-and-display machine"?  After all, the term is not meant to refer to a pay machine AND a display machine...  
Is this a common or ubiquitous convention, or should it be changed to include hyphens?  Reading it without them is awkward.  
Sinnerwiki 10:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To be perfectly honest, I think I've seen a number of car parks which refer to them as both - the hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions seem pretty interchangeable. I do see what you're saying, though. Some reliable sources should be found, and it should be determined which is used more regularly. TheIslander 10:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphenation 

message: I've removed this, which was in the parking coupon section...
:Set up costs are lower than those for parking meters, but its effectiveness is solely determined by the ability to enforce the system by parking attendants.
...since I think parking attendants are equally necessary for parking meter enforcement, and indeed for automated pay-and-display. jnestorius(talk) 17:15, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removals