lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Outline of firefighting

message: Where is there a discussion of "one alarm fire", "two alarm fire", etc.?  I really expected to find it in Fire fighting as well as the topical navigation box (at the bottom of that article).  Perhaps it's called something else?  —EncMstr 21:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''x'' alarm fire

message: See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines".
The Transhumanist 01:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines" 

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: The section Types of uncontrolled fires contains a "main article" link to Fire#Uncontrolled fires. However, that section no longer exists in the target article. Please remove the link or, better yet, replace it with a more appropriate one. Thank you, -- Black Falcon (talk) 06:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncontrolled fire 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines 

message: How about:
* Fires and firefightinng in literature and culture (media)
* Medical and other research on firefighting and firefighters
* Famous firefighters
* Encore careers of firefighters who have left firefighting
* How scientific developments led historically to improvements in firefighting best practices.
These could be interesting developments in a more cultural framework around firefighting. MaynardClark (talk) 18:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional topics?
Talk:Clan Maclachlan

message: The origin given is fanciful, based on nothing more than similarity of name with a family in another country, so I will adjust it 195.92.168.168 13:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: can i just say that on the tartan section someone tried to upload an image of the tartan but it failed. please could whoever it was upload that image again, seeing as it failed
McCarrot 19:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  tartan pic 

message: I think that the article should be moved to Clan Maclachlan (no capitalisation on the "l"). The chief's name is spelt this way, the burkes peerage website lists both the chief and the clan that way, as with Moncrieffe's The Highland Clans. So does the Clan Maclachlan Society website on its mainpage, though it also says The Clan MacLachlan Society has used the spelling of the chief's family when referring to the Clan except that the Society has used capital L as being the accepted usage for 99% of the families. The spelling preferred by an individual family is used in all our records.--Celtus (talk) 07:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, if someone has a problem with it leave a message.--Celtus (talk) 07:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Hi, yeah like the site said, 99 percent of MacLachlans spell it with a capital L, but not the chiefly family. Yeah, on the net and in many books they spell all the clans with uppercase letters after the Mac, but it doesn't seem to be the official way.--Celtus (talk) 11:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clan MacLachlan to Clan Maclachlan 

message: My history teacher (that Neil MacLachlan guy) told us how Lachlan got killed. He was hit by a cannon shot and lost his head. Maybe we should put that info in the article..?
McCarrot (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We've got a reference to him being killed by a cannon shot, but not about him losing his head. If you can find a reference add it in.--Celtus (talk) 11:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lachlan MacLachlan's death at Culloden 

message: I have approved Good Article status.  I think it is well-written and worthy of Good status.  I have a couple of suggestions:
1. Perhaps situate better this clan in UK history.
2. Elaborate a bit on the purpose of the various societies in other countries; what role do they plan in the clan?
3. What purpose does the clan chief serve today?
Congratulations!Wuapinmon (talk) 19:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the suggestions, i'll work on trying to address them.--Celtus (talk) 07:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article Review
Talk:Secret Court of 1920

message: The wording 'led astray by homosexuals' is a little fishy, so I changed it. --99.250.177.248 (talk) 23:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've tried to expand this entry to report the incident fully. Just a few points: Wright's book makes things up so it needs to be read carefully. He makes up entire conversations. He also (I think obviously) misreads plain evidence. In many ways I agree with his overall conception of what happened. It's just that he isn't capable of staying with the evidence. I'd be happy to discuss any of these issues and more if someone is interested. Most noetworthy, I think, is his mistaken contention that Harvard hounded Lumbard in the 1950s. In others cases the two accounts we have just tell us different things -- I've done what I can with those "disputes." Not fun really -- just two sources and one just makes me want to scream. What we need is a scholarly account, which Wright's work may unfortunately have pre-empted.
NPOV is of course a tough issue. I'm sure upon reflection that I'd do some re-writing. 
A few other details. I've always hated the fact that the former entry was illustrated with the portrait of Lowell. This isn't Lowell's story. I've substituted a few different images (including a different one of Lowell). I'll add a pic of Perkins Hall after I next go to Cambridge, probably next week.
Cheers and Happy New Year to all!
Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite and expansion, Dec. 30, 2009

message: There is an entry for Harry Dreyfus, but I think Harry Dreyfus is not notable except for his role in the Secret Court of 1920. The fact that his father owned a hotel that was destroyed in a (locally) famous fire doesn't count for much. I think the Harry Dreyfus entry should be merged into the Secret Court of 1920. The latter already has a short bio for Harry Dreyfus.
Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 04:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that that merge has already been completed. I totally agree. — Becksguy (talk) 10:16, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: Reassessed as Class B for the :WP:WikiProject LGBT studies/Assessment. The article was downgraded from B to C in July 2008, but the article has been more than significantly expanded since then (from roughly 12K to 57K bytes). Comparing this article with the LGBT assessment criteria, specifically the example of a C class article, Transwoman, and carefully reviewing the C class quality scale criteria, easily convinces me that Secret Court is significantly better on the scale than the C class example. Also, comparing this article with the quality scale criteria for B class articles, and comparing this article with the B class example, Gay icon, also convinces me that this article is comparable to B class. Therefore I've reapplied the B class assessment. Note that this article has been listed as a peer review article since December 2009 without any further participation.  So I'm being bold and jumping in. By all means, please lets discuss. — Becksguy (talk) 09:46, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessment
Talk:Roy Ascott

message: Among the 'students' is listed Peter Anders, which is a disambiguation page.  It is unclear whether the student was Peter Anders (songwriter) or another Peter Anders not listed on the dab page.  --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to 'Peter Anders'

message: I thought Eno was a student of Ascott's at Ipswich, not Ealing. I think Ascott went from Ealing to Ipswich and continued his 'Groundcourse' there. Is this correct? If so I will update the article. Hpengwyn (talk) 12:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ipswich

message: there is a documentary of Ascott's term at the Ontario College of Art
http://books.google.at/books?id=jw_ksZ2hK1MC&pg=PA163&dq=Roy+ascott+Ontario+college+of+Art&hl=de&ei=NKp1TsjVE4fc4QTp_PyPDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEwQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=Roy%20ascott%20Ontario%20college%20of%20Art&f=false
youtube has a part of it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjH73QiocGM
The film is also included in the retrospective exhibition on Roy Ascott which is touring since launched at the Plymouth Arts Centre in 2009.
http://www.plymouthartscentre.org/art/2009/roy-ascott.html
I saw the retrospective at the Space gallery in London, in June of this year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cezaic (talk • contribs) 08:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ontario College of Art
Talk:Juan Valdez drinks Costa Rican coffee

message: There is no mention of where these legal actions took place.  The reader can't determine which jurisdiction these actions would fall under. 199.91.34.33 (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jurisdiction 

message: I live in Costa Rica (In the Metropolitan area) and you hardly hear the Jual Valdez slogan. Most of the Costa rican have no clue who is Juan Valdez. ~~mowattabr  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.191.197.137 (talk) 02:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Opinion 

message: This article leaves unclear whether costa rica can use the phrase or not. The t-shirt thing was settled, but what about the slogan?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.86.249.149 (talk) 14:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear 
Talk:Planetary Collegium

message: In the paragraph beginning "PhD graduates ...", one person listed is Peter Anders, which link leads to a disambiguation page.  It is not clear whether the correct association should be with Peter Anders (songwriter) or with another, unlisted person. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to 'Peter Anders'

message: I just wanted to note that the majority of the content of this wiki is pasted in from their website's about page. I am less familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines on this but I would imagine this goes against some rule or another because it 1) means that it was written by the parties involved and as such 2) contains information that is not neutral and probably not appropriate for wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etherfire (talk • contribs) 17:36, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy from their Website 
Talk:Fellsmere, Florida

message: Is the name somehow related to Felsenmeer? It means sea of rocks. I couldn't find any sources for this hunch.
See here.  https://www.britannica.com/science/felsenmeer GreaterPonce665 (TALK)  01:57, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you please add this to the article? Thanks. Kiran_891 (TALK)  20:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology
Talk:Tolkien's legendarium

message: I am surprised that Unfinished Tales is not even listed, let alone discussed. It is far more substantial than The Adventures of Tom Bombadil or Bilbo's Last Song, and I see no reason to exclude it, but I don't know Tolkien research particularly well, so I may be missing something?--Verbarson (talk) 21:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  We basically have to go by what scholars write; and no text article can (or should) be exhaustive, but I've managed to work in a brief mention. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Unfinished Tales]]''
Talk:Chicago Humanities Festival

message: and why is this important for wikipedians to know??? STRONG DELETE -ForrestLane42 13:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic

message: I'm removing this tag for the following reason: Festival is notable on the face of it, has a 15 year history and impressive institutional sponsorship, and has had an impressive roster of speakers every year.
The article may need to be expanded to make this clear, but it's not a speedy deletion candidate.
ForrestLane42, if you still want to pursue this, the proper procedure is not to reinsert the unencyclopedic tag or any other speedy-deletion tag.  Instead, open an "Article for Deletion" (afd1) or "Proposed Deletion" (prod).  Do this with a tag like this:
  (or)

This will open a proposed-deletion discussion in the appropriate place, and at the end of 5 days or so, an admin will assess the comments that have been made and either delete the article or not.  (Personally, I don't recommend doing this since I think the consensus  will be a clear Keep, but I could be wrong.)
Cheers, everybody, in this season of peace. Eleuther 04:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Tag

message: I've just marked the word "now" with the "when" template, in the section .  That content is out of date, if 2009 was the first year and "now" is the third year - in 2018.  yoyo (talk) 11:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date info
Talk:Virtual image

message: Near the top, the article states that "because the rays never really converge, one can project only a virtual image, but not a real image. Note that it cannot be obtained on a screen.
In contrast, a real image is an image in which the outgoing rays from a point on the object pass through a single point. It is easiest to observe real images when projected on an opaque screen".
Am I reading it wrong, or should the sentence in the first paragraph say "one can project only a real image, but not a virtual image"? 80.103.77.221 (talk) 21:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which one can be projected? 

message: In optics, a virtual image and a virtual object are different.  A virtual image is an image composed of diverging light.  A virtual object is an object that is composed of converging light.  A real object creates diverging light.  A real image is created by converging light. Dradamh (talk) 07:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is virtual object redirected here? 

message: If the object is at the focal point, the 'image' is at infinity: shouldn't that case be covered under the definition of 'virtual image'?
Or should there be a third image type - real | virtual | infinity ?
--195.137.93.171 (talk) 19:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The infinity case
Talk:To All New Arrivals

message: I've listened to The Man in You over and over and couldn't find where Tears for Fears' Shout is sampled. The latter is a song I know very well, one of those I can "play inside my head" note by note. Would the person who made the statement please point where the sample is? Come on, I'm talking to you, come on... ;-)
--UrsoBR (talk) 06:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, listen @ 0:39 if you don't believe it. 190.161.17.48 (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

text: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.161.17.48 (talk) 21:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Shout'' sampled?
Talk:Roseland, Florida

message: I just stopped my Roseland Community Park, looking for a good place to launch a Kayak. There was a historical sign that gave more details about Roseland, how can that be added? 2601:58B:4880:34F0:C25:314E:A154:FC42 (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Sign
Talk:Thembi

message: so, is it son's or wife's name?
Mnavi 20:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first two paragraphs of this article read more like a review of the album (e.g. "...the use of studio effects gives a fearsome effect...", "energetic", "Lonnie Liston Smith['s]... presence is a major factor" etc.); it has no attributions. The critical reception paragraph is OK but needs to be better formatted with footnotes. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 
Talk:Wabasso Beach, Florida

message: Wabasso Beach was the only beach access in Indian River County where it was legal for black people to congregate..Florida being the most southern part of the US was arguably  the most racist place in America..Indian River County was no exception..apartheid was the law of the land here until the 1960`s..Native Americans were forbidden to inhabit or travel near the coast which had been their traditional homes and fishing grounds..blacks were not allowed on the beach in Florida..when the laws began to change Wabasso was the only place in the county they were allowed.75.139.89.187 (talk) 06:09, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Segregated Beach Access
Category talk:Palestinian rabbis

message: Note: Many articles about the rabbis of the Talmud and Mishnah are derived from the archaic Jewish Encyclopedia, published between 1901-1906, over one hundred years ago (when the Middle East was still under the thumb of the Ottoman Turks) and which used the archaic expressions "Palestine" when referring to the Land of Israel, and to the Jews living in the areas of the historical Land of Israel as "Palestinians." This is a big mistake that requires constant attention and correction, especially when copying and editing articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia or from similarly archaic sources such as Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897). At this time, no-one uses the term/s "Palestinian/s" (in relation to anything associated with Jews or the land they lived in and which they regarded as their homeland) nor by any type of conventional Jewish scholarship, particularly at the present time when the label "Palestinian" is almost entirely identified with the Palestinian Arabs who are mostly Muslims. Finally, kindly take note that the name Palestinian Talmud is also not used and it redirects to the conventional term Jerusalem Talmud used in Jewish scholarship. Thank you. IZAK 13:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion

message: Makes sense, I'll try to remember.  However, there was a period when everyone referred to the land of Israel as Palestine.  Therefore, to say something like "in 1940 Shlomo Pines emigrated to Israel" would appear to be an anachronism.  Don't we have to use the term "Palestine" during a certain period for historical accuracy?  What is this period?  From Roman conquest until 1948?  Thanks.  Dfass 15:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis
Talk:United States prisoners of war in the 2003 invasion of Iraq

message: Was seven the final number of American POWs in the war? -- Esemono 13:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are there any POWs captured by the insurgency? -- Esemono 13:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ongoing

message: The following sentence isn't gramatical, is poorly written, and confusing: "From their unit nine soldiers in the company were captured in the ambush and following soldiers surrendered to Iraqi forces:"
Just how many were captured? Was the whole company ambushed, or a major portion of it, or a small portion of it? How many of the ambushed group were killed outright, how many subsequently died of wounds, or injuries (due to crashed vehicles), how many escaped (if any)? Again how many were captured? How did Jessica Lynch, alone of the group become such a hero (the greatest heroine since Joan of Arc)? After their capture how were they treated? Were any of them tortured? Was (as has been claimed) Jessica Lynch anally sodomized? What is the story behind the instant legendary heroism of Jessica Lynch as depicted and claimed in major media outlets. The "heroic" liberation of Jessica Lynch from an Iraqi hospital was falsly portrayed and claimed by the U.S. media, and was in fact practically staged (according to a story in "The Guardian"). There are two stories here that should be told: 1) what really happened; and, 2)  what the media in the U.S. hyped, concocted, and covered up!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.95.205 (talk) 04:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not at all clear what happened 

message: "The 507th were a support company, and surrendered after all their weapons jammed." - This is highly doubtful.
If the weapons ran out of ammunition because they were a support company and hence had less ammunition issued then perhaps it should just state that. It is virtually impossible that all weapons of an entire support company '"jammed" at the same time.
It is plausible, however, that after a short battle they all ran out of ammunition.Music man214 (talk) 03:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 507th
Talk:Null allele

message: The first paragraph is pulled directly from a textbook word-for-word. I see this article is part of a WikiProject, does that mean that the author of that textbook is contributing to the article and so that is acceptable? Or should I re-word the paragraph and add a citation?Jcswint (talk) 04:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: "one different base pair, possibly due to genetic mutation"
Possibly? What else than a genetic mutation?
::Fixed by deleting "possibly" Dr d12 22:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possibly?

message: A mutant allele that produces no protein is called a protein null (shown by Western analysis), and one that produces to RNA is called an RNA null   Is "no RNA" meant rather than "to RNA"? Nagelfar 21:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, fixed typo Dr d12 22:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  typo? 

message: First off, if your first paragraph is taken directly from a textbook, textbooks are usually produced for profit and therefore the intellectual property cannot be given away for free on here. I would just reword it, even on the offchance that it's fine. 
You need a citation for the O blood type example.
Under "Parentage Analysis" you mention that a homozygous parent produced offspring with a different homozygous genotype. How is this possible? If this is a null allele effect, you need to mention that, and preferably explain how this comes about(supported by the article?)
Overall it reads pretty well and has a decent amount of information but ultimately needs elaboration.
Jmmatthews5 (talk) 18:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joey's Peer Review
Talk:Supreme Court of Georgia (country)

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
*Support per nom.--Tlmclain  | Talk 16:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *Support per nom.--Tlmclain  | Talk 16:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes