lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pterygoplichthys multiradiatus

message: Found this image  - Question can anyone confirm that it's correctly titled - looks a lot like Liposarcus pardalis? I don't have the answer..HappyVR 18:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Found image

message: Can somebody transliterate 輻翼甲鯰 ?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  23:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Lingua obscura''
Talk:Media event

message: I started this article a few weeks ago. I think it's a worthy topic, but it desperately needs refs to bring it away from "original research". Most of the existing statements are very commonly agreed-upon by "media historians" and the like, but the sources need to be shown. Yes, I should do it myself (and will try to over the coming months), but unfortunately I am seriously ill and can only work in tiny bursts. So, if you're someone with some knowledge in the field, please consider helping out with both editing and finding/listing references. Thx. JDG 18:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This article is flawed in so many ways - riddled with inaccuracies, misconceptions and invalid examples. Whoever added the citations obviously did not read the works they are citing either. I'd do something about it, but you know, WP is a sinking ship; and I got rid of my account for a reason. I'm bringing the fact that the article is buggered to heck and back to attention here, so if anyone else can be bothered, the book by Dayan and Katz describes the concept of media events very well. It's just a shame none of the previous editors here ever bothered to look inside it. --80.213.208.24 (talk) 15:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A proper mess 

message: I have flagged this article as needing expert attention and notified the Journalism project on their talk page.  Veriss (talk) 23:21, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  flagged this article as needing expert attention 

message: Completing an incomplete merge proposal from last year. The two topics aren't identical -- "pseudo-event" has a performance art connotation, whereas "media event" has a commercial or political connotation -- but they're close enough, and small enough, that it would be better to leverage their commonalities with one page. --Sneftel (talk) 23:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge from pseudo-event 
Talk:Norrbotten

message: A user today added the same info both to this article and to Norrbotten County (see ). Ideally, duplicated information should only be presented in one article and it should be explicitly stated in each article which articles deal with which topic. Suggestion on which article should best contain which info? Feel free to make the changes yourself. / Fred-Chess 18:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: This region has its own unique subtype of Gauchers Disease. I think it’s worth mentioning but I may be the only one. Genetikbliss (talk) 18:29, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaucher’s disease
Template talk:POV map

message: Wow, nice idea here! Some very interesting discussions can be made about any maps point of view. I really do like this idea and think it will help bring attention to maps that tend to be POV skewed in a given article. Just as a question, have you noticed pages where this is needed right now? Lsjzl 18:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. I should have clicked on "what links here" before I asked that question at the end. It seems though that the <noinclude> tag is still showing up? Lsjzl 18:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The whole idea

message: Most maps often show one country's claim to a region and often try and embed the region inside its borders. Since WP:NPOV is non-negotiable, here are ways to achieve NPOV maps. (In the following example, we're looking from Country A's point of view.)
;Border styles: 
*Undisputed boundary should be a thick line
*Boundary of area claimed by A (but not administered): Dotted
*Boundary of area claimed by other country B: Another dotted style
*De-facto boundary between the two in the disputed area: dashed
;Shading
*Undisputed territory of A: (Colour CA)
*Undisputed territory of B: (Colour CB)
*Area claimed by A, but administered by B: A neutral colour between CA and CB, but closer to CA
*Area claimed by B, but administered by A: A neutral colour between CA and CB, but closer to CB
For reference see :Image:India-locator-map-blank.svg
=Nichalp «Talk»= 12:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing bias 

message: This map is presumably intended for map pages. What about inline version for captions? Also, shouldn't this template have a counterpart on Commons? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inline version
File talk:Carrots of many colors.jpg

message: There is a larger version of this picture available. Direct link (may be temporary): ftp://199.133.10.188/k11611-1.jpg Perhaps this image should be replaced by the larger version. --84.178.94.50 19:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The images are actually the exact same size. To see the full size of the image, you need to click on it. Its size is lowered for viewing on the page, so it doesn't fill up the entire screen. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 15:18, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larger version
Talk:Stephen Dixon (newsreader)

message: Article is relevent as many journalists and newsreaders already have pages. Seeing as he presents regular shows for a large TV news channel, why delete this article?Flymeoutofhere 19:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Crisis of Empire

message: In the book Crisis of Empire; Book I: An Honorable Defense, in the first pages in Chapter 1, a historical Earth person is mentioned. Saint John Golden Mouth is written to have lived and died, 3407 B.P. to 3347 Before Pact (B.P.). Since he died 407 A.D., a simple addition of  407 + 3347 gives the start of the Pact as 3754 A.D. Then, in the secret communication announcing the assassination, the date is "Earth reference 12 November 5341 post Pact". Then, adding 3754 + 5341, gives 9095 A.D.
Since the author took pains to mention dates, I think it is safe to conclude this is an Easter egg of the start of the Pact.
Please discuss. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Future history. Fixing style/layout errors
Talk:Project Flower

message: There seem some inconsistency in the sources provided. They talk about 'Gabriel anti-ship missile' being the focus on the project (a replacement for the USA harpoon missile) and on the other there is a comment about 'Jericho-2' ballistic missile which would be able to carry nukes and Israels concerns about it. I think these two were previously synthesized into one.--Nilsol2 (talk) 08:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear? 

message: I think the section claiming 'Fraud' needs more sources. An unnamed official claiming they "outsmarted" the Iranians in book about a secret war between sure sounds much better than we provided support to what become our biggest enemy. --Nilsol2 (talk) 08:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fraud?
Talk:Jamie Lloyd

message: In the next few days, I'm going to try to add sources and create any stylistic flaws.  Mike1981 20:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where did this information come from? The only canonical (in any of the series' continuities) real name she has been given is Cynthia Myers in the official novella Halloween: Sam by Stefan Hutchinson.Mm2dylan (talk) 07:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laurie's Birth Name Is NOT Laura Ann Myers 
Talk:The Milne School

message: Any information that comes from the website www.albany.edu/~milne/ can be used here because I am the owner of that site and have permission to use any verbiage that appears there. However, I have changed the wording so that there is no issue with plagiarism.
JudyMadnick 19:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Coal pier

message: Coal as Bulk cargo on vessels???
::Yes, the shops are called colliers. Hampton Roads exports large quantities fromn loading facilities at Newport News and Lamberts Point in Norfolk, Virginia. Vaoverland 09:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Even with more about how these places worked, and direct mention of Curtis Bay, this has a strong Virginia-outbound bias. We need material on how the coal is received at the other end, and mention of other important/pioneering facilties. Mangoe 17:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rather incomplete
Talk:Panama Limited

message: The steam locomotive on photo accompaning the article is Pacific type passenger locomotive:
* Illinois Central Nr.1053 4-6-2 built by Baldwin Locomotive Works in 1909 with works number 33824. 
Originally when left the works it was saturated two cylinder simple expansion 
( cylinders 24" x 28" ) locomotive with 77" driving wheels. Later it was rebuilt with superheater.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.113.124 (talk) 18:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pacific Locomotive Nr.1053
Talk:Vacuum flask cooking

message: I was looking these up on Amazon - it turns out in English we call them "thermal cookers" and modified the article saying as much. Could somebody make an article for "thermal cooker" and redirect it here? I don't know how to do that myself. And somebody mention that with the most modern versions, there's two vessels - a pot that can be used directly on the stovetop for browning the meat and bringing the broth to a boil, and a larger vessel that is the vacuum flask and the smaller vessel fits inside it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.213.55 (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: (Comment)

message: I believe a picture would be nice --Nytemunkey 19:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Googlefight shows "thermal cooking" is a more common name than "vacuum flask cooking".  Any objections?  Samw (talk) 00:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed rename: thermal cooking

message: Thermal cooking should be merged into this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.30.23 (talk) 23:08, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I recommend that both Thermal cooking / Thermal cooker and Vacuum flask cooking be merged with Haybox. These are all either pure synonyms for the same process or slight variations on the process based on particular cooker designs. I would further suggest that all of these synonymous page names to directed to a design-neutral page name, either "Insulation cooker" or "Retained-heat cooker". The term "thermal cooker" is also design neutral, however it is something of a misnomer as ALL cooking involves the application of heat to food, and so fails to express the uniqueness of this particular approach. "Insulation cooker" and "retained-heat cooker" succeed in expressing the unique feature of this method of cooking. "Haybox," "vacuum-flask," and other such names refer to specific design approaches to achieving insulation cooking. Jtellerelsberg (talk) 16:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Haybox 

message: Isn't all cooking "thermal"??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomTrottier (talk • contribs) 22:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed rename: retained heat cooking
Category talk:Islamic scholar stubs

message: I suggest that the name of this category be changed to 'Scholars of Islam stubs' is the term Islamic scholars should refer to Islamic scholars in the traditional sense.  Islamic scholars are religious authorities whose publications or statements are accepted as pronouncements on religion by their respective communities and adherents. Amirah talk 20:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change of name
Talk:Nolo contendere

message: I'm fairly sure this isn't a real concept.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.235.150.153 (talk) 15:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Ball Sack" concept

message: : "Nolo contendere" is Latin and literally means "I do not want to contend it." Are people sure? My latin would give a literal translation of "I am unwilling to contend/contest" - with no object pronoun. lxowle 22:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sometimes translations cannot be translated word for word. There are many translations like this. Or use inter-changeable words. "Do not want" means the same thing as "unwilling". I suppose it just varies on what they go by or who translated. DiamondTKE (talk) 06:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  "comes from the Latin phrase for "I do not wish to contend" - is it correct to say "is the Latin phrase ..."? Pgan002 (talk) 03:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Latin Translation

message: In Matthews 26:63-65, Jesus is being questioned by the religious authorities and the high priest says, "I put You under oath by the Living God: Tell us if You are the Christ, the Son of God!" And Jesus said to him, "It is as you said.  Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven." Then the high priest tore his clothes saying, "He has spokedn blasphemy! What further need do we have of witnesses?  Look, now you have heard His blasphemy!"
Jesus had claimed equality with God.  In Mark 15:1-2 He is asked if He is the "King of the Jews" and He replies "It is as you say.."  In Luke 22:70 Are you the Son of God and Jesus says "you rightly say that I am"  In Luke 23:3 He replies "it is as you say" to the inquiry if He is King of the Jews.  In John 18:33-37 In His exchange with Pilate He claims that His kingdom was "not of this world"  He stayed silent only during all the accusations trumped up against him.  During a direct question about His position, He claimed that He was God.  He claimed it inthe way the Jews would know, Son of God and as noted in Matthew 26, "the Christ" (Greek for messiah).  My notations are from the NKJV of the Bible.
This post is misleading and inaccurate.  Those English Ecclessiatics may have said this, but the Bible itself DOES NOT.  Anthony J. Fejfar is in error under the ORIGINS section.  The phrase "nolo contendere" may have been used in English Ecclesiastical Law, but it is not based directly on the BIBLE!  His sentence about Jesus neither agreed nor denied guilt to the charge of being the Messiah is incorrect. (see above notation)  These sentences should be removed.````
the article contains a note about being too USA centric, but, does this plea actually exist anywhere else ? or is the poster to that note USA centric enough to think it exists somewhere else, when it doesn't ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.147.18.116 (talk) 00:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This may have English Ecclesiastical origins, but NOT Biblical ones.
File talk:Kabyle-speaking-map.jpg

message: Posted on Talk:Kabyle language:
:Image:Kabyle-speaking-map.jpg is rubbish.  It:
* includes Algiers, which does not have a Kabyle-speaking majority;
* includes Boumerdes, which does not have a Kabyle-speaking majority;
* includes Dellys, which does not have a Kabyle-speaking majority (though the first Kabyle-speaking villages on the coast west of Algiers start almost immediately west of Dellys);
* includes Jijel, which is not Kabyle-speaking at all (though their dialect of Arabic is heavily Kabyle-influenced, and Jijel might be considered "ethnically" Kabyle, whatever that would mean);
* includes the Chenoua language, which (despite its location) is more similar to Chaouia than to Kabyle;
* includes the town of Cherchell, which (unlike the villages around it) speaks Arabic;
* is completely unsourced.
Please keep this piece of unsuccessful guesswork out of Wikipedia, and use the academically sourced map :Image:Kabyle-map.jpg until such time as someone produces something larger-scale and at least equally well-sourced. - Mustafaa 19:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:Carrick navigation box

message: There are other navigation boxes exactly the same, for different areas which haven't been deleted. Not sure of the worth of this kind of navigation box, but either all or none of them should be deleted. --Richhoncho 19:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This template is similar to Template:SW England. It is one step down in the hierarchy and it's purpose is to link together parishes in the same district. It is designed to follow the same pattern of the Template:Penwith navigation box which is a neighbouring district in Cornwall. I had added the nav box to some pages which I am still working on but someone keeps deleting them before I have had the chance to add more information. (which I don't find useful)-- Talskiddy 21:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Empty articles are pretty useless. Please write at least a decent stub, which will then probably not be deleted. This saves your time and that of new page patrollers and admins. Kusma (討論) 21:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

message: See WP:Cornwall talk page for a discussion relating to the structure civil parish navigation in Cornwall as well as the List of civil parishes in Cornwall article. To keep the discussion in one place, please make any contributions relating to it on that talk page and not in this section.
Zangar (talk) 15:05, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on structure of civil parishes list
Talk:Francis Phoebus

message: There was no Francis II, so why Francis I? Maybe "Francis of Navarre" is a better title. Srnec 20:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was in the person of Francis Phoebus. --Sugaar 20:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Of the opposes, I see disagreement with the application of WP:CONCISE, and a singular concern of precision. Supports mention WP:CONCISE as applying to the proposed title and cite WP:NCROY. I see a rough consensus for this move, especially considering the strength of the recent NCROY RFC mentioned explicitly in some supports. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sennecaster (Chat) 02:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Francis Phoebus of Navarre →  – Per WP:NCROY: Only use a territorial designation (e.g. country) when disambiguation is needed. As far as I can tell, he is the only monarch named Francis Phoebus. Векочел (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Weak oppose - Normally, I'm inclined to support these sorts of thing (even though its against my personal preference), but using only a first name in the sort of circumstance really should be kept to names easily WP:RECOGNIZABLE, like Marie Antoinette or Maria Theresa. estar8806 (talk) ★ 02:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Oppose per @Estar8806 Killuminator (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "despite efforts to halt it" Yes, Wikipedia keeps getting worse in recent years, despite our efforts to improve it. Dimadick (talk) 14:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 January 2024
Talk:Knocking (2006 film)

message: I've heard there will be a lot more persecution in the us towards us; I wonder if it's a rumor or if it's somehow related to this documentary? 68.222.35.201 05:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  persecution rumors? 

message: Is this movie biased somehow?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.6.160.41 (talk) 22:48, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Kariba, Zimbabwe

message: I heard receintly that the dam wall has not been inspected since the end of colonial rule. Does anyone know if this is correct? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.124.247.200 (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kariba inspections 

message: Whats going on Illijic (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake Kariba Water Levels 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Face of Kariba. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 29#Face of Kariba until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Face of Kariba" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Macclesfield Bank

message: Map request has been fulfilled (feature map, overview map) --Ratzer 08:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map request

message: See this thread at ANI. GotR Talk 16:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Code of conduct for the South China Sea 

message: Our article makes clear that "Zhongsha Islands" refers to an area wider than Macclesfield Bank, including other features that have their own article, such as Huangyan Island. Is there any good reason why we shouldn't have a separate article for "Zhongsha Islands", or why Zhongsha should be considered synonymous with Macclesfield on Wikipedia (by redirect)? Shrigley (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. Offhand, I don't have a good answer. I note that the Sansha article describes that as a prefecture within the bailiwick of the PRC, and says that Macclesfield Bank and Zongsha Islands together make up one town in that perfecture. Googling around, I found , which comments about this. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for Zhongsha 

message: Is this a typo from "Bangkok" or is it actually "Bankok"? Sowelilitokiemu (talk) 23:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter, apparently. See , , . Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bankok" Shoal 
Talk:Matthew Island and Hunter Island

message: They have made it to their island! They are planning to sail again in November of 2012. --VarickWebbofSpanionte (talk) 23:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof of Lost Island micronational claim 
Talk:Sixty-Four Villages East of the River

message: A Chinese map has been added. I will plan drawing a localized and enlarged map of the area later.--Jusjih 14:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this supposed to be the only "reliable" source? I suggest prodding the inflammatory page. --Ghirla-трёп- 23:04, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed and replaced with somewhat better sources. Maxwell only mentions this issue peripherally and Yan argues with a very strong point of view, but they're better than those WP:FRINGE articles that were there before. cab (talk) 07:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Anything for Power: The Real Story of China’s Jiang Zemin"
Talk:Buchberger's algorithm

message: The remark that Buchberger's algorithm is (not considering any refinements thereof) the only known way to compute Groebner bases is not correct.
Another approach that has been implemented (and that has been found to be very competitive in terms of running time) is based on the concept of involutive bases. The latter are based on ideas from differential algebra, in particular on work from the french mathematician Riquier. Involutive bases have been investigated, among others, by Gerdt and Blinkov.
62.214.243.240 20:11, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article is presently written, this is the complete reduction that is used. The lacking content is that one gets an correct algorithm by using lead reduction instead of complete reduction, and doing complete reduction only after the termination of the main loop. Be free to clarify the equivalence of these two variants. D.Lazard (talk) 19:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)