lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Malachite green

message: http://static.dna.gov/lab-manual/Linked%20Documents/Protocols/pdi_lab_pro_2.18.pdf
This page talks about the standard method of using leucomalachite green to detect blood. Specifically, you can't spray it around like you can luminol - the peroxide has to be added to the swab as a separate step.  I was just watching a forensic files where they misused it.
The above is a lab SOP from a US Government site called "The DNA Initiative" (Site Root available through http://www.dna.gov).  I am going to try and add this as an external link and as a citation.  If I am unable to do so properly perhaps someone else can, using this information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simicich (talk • contribs) 21:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A citation needed for Leucomalachite green as a presumptive test for blood. 

message: This page is unreferenced, yet appears to be a genuine test. It does not seem sufficiently notable to warrant a separate page, but is relevant to the main Malachite Green page. Parkywiki (talk) 16:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Malachite Green Test]] 
Talk:Pleasures of the Harbor

message: Great album, but holy shit is this article unbelieveably poorly written.Munich hilton (talk) 12:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Ridge (meteorology)

message: A ridge is the opposite of a trhough, how can someone redirect the firtst to the other article where there is no mention of ridges?????
Pierre cb (talk) 14:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I recreated the article with more substance! Pierre cb (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad redirection 

message: A ridge may be an elongated area of isobars/isohypses circling a high but it makes sense only if this is a multi-week or monthly analysis as it occurs often in the subtropics. Indeed, any area of isobars/isohypses circling a high is exactly the definition of an anticyclone and the word "anticyclone" will be used for a weekly or multi-day analysis.
Another key definition of a ridge is the extension of an anticyclone as a crest. Any extension of a high (ridge, crest) or a low (trough) has generally wave attributes and this is fundamental to understand the weather dynamics in the mid-latitudes. In the UK and all mid-latitudes countries, the definition is like this one:
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/binaries/content/assets/metofficegovuk/pdf/research/library-and-archive/library/publications/factsheets/factsheet_11-interpreting-weather-charts.pdf
"A ridge (of high pressure), also termed a Wedge, is an extension of an anticyclone or high-pressure area 
shown on a synoptic chart and is generally associated with fine, anticyclonic-type weather."2A01:E0A:9D2:3E20:6F5:75DA:8ADE:6911 (talk) 20:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too large-scale subtropical definition 

message: "Surface ridges, just like highs, generate fair weather because they develop under wind convergence in the negative vorticity advection zone ahead of the upper level ridge." is not fine. The referenced webpage does not say that.
Both the fair weather and surface ridge/high are generated by upper-level wind convergence = negative vorticity advection = deep layer subsidence. The surface ridge/high only controls, in some sense, the surface wind. 2A01:E0A:9D2:3E20:6F5:75DA:8ADE:6911 (talk) 20:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading role attribution
Talk:Trough (meteorology)

message: (concerning the merge tag) Just my two cents, but I think troughs have enough importance to keep their own article, and should not be merged with Surface weather analysis. EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 05:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Perhaps we could get some graphical representations of each kind. Also, we can't forget surface troughs! ~ Triberocker (talk) 21:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think its supposed to be a top-down view, i.e. as would be depicted on a weather chart (with north at the top of the image).  The long, sinuous line is (I think) meant to represent an isobar (ridges and troughs are so-called because when charted, the isobars around them resemble the contour lines around physical ridges and valley on a topographic map).  That really needs to be said in the article (if someone can find a cite for it), and the graphic needs to be better labled (or replaced entierly). Wardog (talk) 14:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures, Additional Troughs 

message: In the article, part of the caption under a satellite picture reads: "A very large trough (about 8000 km or more) crosses the North Atlantic Ocean from north east to south west." The verb "to cross" suggests (at least to me; and refer to https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cross#English) a movement, and according to the suggestion in the caption, in this case it would be a motion from northeast to southwest.
As far as I know, such a direction of motion for troughs in the Northern Hemisphere is rather rare, and even more so along an 8,000 km long feature (as indicated in the caption). Therefore, I suppose what the author really meant to say: "A very large trough (about 8000 km or more) lies across the North Atlantic Ocean from northeast to southwest." The wording "stretches across" would also do, I suppose. Could the author comment to this and state the intended message?Redav (talk) 10:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording: "crosses" or "lies/stretches across"?
Talk:Block (meteorology)

message: The reference to 'Rex blocks' as consisting 'of a high situated to the north of a low' needs to be debated a little. According to the US National Weather Services site it is indeed: Rex Block - A blocking pattern where there is an upper level high located directly north of a closed low. However all blocking patterns occur when the high is poleward of the low and hence to the south in the southern hemisphere. If a 'Rex block' is specific to the USA as I have not heard of it before [I live and work in the field within Australia], then I believe that its definition should be referred to as being specifically a USA phenomenon, because no blocking pattern in the southern hemisphere arises with the high to the north of the low. 
The current content makes no specific mention of this being the case and should be altered accordingly.
Nsdave (talk) 03:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rex blocks

message: * What classification is a blocking barricade-like high ridge from Iceland to the Azores? This brings cold weather from the north to Britain (where I am enduring the European winter storms of 2009–2010). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Atlantic blocks

message: How and why does a cut-off low develop? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 20:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanism  

message: I live in the Northern Hemisphere. Nsdave's comment in 2008 would have been about the article as it was then. I had never heard about Block (meteorology) until very recently, when the article was linked from 2021 Western North America heat wave. I suppose Nsdave's comment is no longer needed. I'm not bold enough to delete Nsdave's comment here. Oaklandguy (talk) 20:48, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Nsdave's comment from 2008: Article now refers to "Northern Hemisphere" etc.
Talk:Feltus Taylor

message: This article is a biography for a living person who is notable for one event. Guideline WP:BIO1E advises that as a general rule such articles should cover the event, not the person. When writing about criminal acts, having distinct biographies of victims or perpetrators that are separate from the article about the crime is normally only necessary if the crime is a notable historic event and the person's role is significant or they are separately notable for other reasons. In this article, once the crime and its consequential sentence and execution are given due weight, there is almost nothing else left to write a biography about. Since the crime totally outweighs any other aspect of the biography, about the only thing that suggests this is a biography is the title and one sentence in the lead section. In reality, this article is a coat rack article about a murder that is disguised as a biography. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography for living person notable for one event
Talk:Pimba

message: Yep, Pimba is a Portuguese word but this article isn't about the word Pimba. As to the disclaimer on the :Category:Portuguese words and phrases page, this category should only be used for articles that are about Portuguese words and not about things that are named in Portuguese. So like Índia pega no laço, Vive, viva, and vivat, and Negro should use this category since the articles are about the words, whereas articles like Universidade Estadual do Maranhão or Pão de queijo shouldn't use this category since those articles are about things that have Portuguese names. BaduFerreira (talk) 11:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing [[:Category:Portuguese words and phrases]]
Talk:USS Housatonic (1861)

message: gives: displacement 1934 t, draught 16.6ft (5.1m) and speed of 12 kts, what seems more reliable to me. Pibwl talk 23:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  "The encyclopedia of ships" gives p. 256 also these facts (1934 tons, 5 m draugt and 11,6 kts. 214 crew...--141.2.190.162 (talk) 18:54, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

message: Hello. What is "the bar"? Is it a sort of "boom defence"? --Maxrossomachin (talk) 05:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it refers to the artificial sandbar upon which Fort Sumter stands, but I'm not sure enough to update the article. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 06:26, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bar
Talk:Alive & Wired

message: Inviting ,  and any other interested parties to discuss whether this meets WP:ALBUM or WP:GNG. I couldn't establish that it does and think it should be a redirect to band. Boleyn (talk) 19:16, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (albums). -- Mikeblas (talk) 04:16, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag
Talk:Guanabacoa

message: I am taking out the whole sentence "Guanabacoa is also known for its beautiful beaches, such as Santa María del Mar, Tarara, Guanabo and Rincón Azul."
Guanabacoa does not have beaches !
-- Beardo 23:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You obviously know more about this than the anonymous user that started the article, as you live in Havana, so just go ahead and change it. Happy editing. Qyd (talk)04:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Beaches?
Talk:Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant

message: Is there a source for the 1971 spill incident?  None of the linked pages talk about it.  I've lived in MN my whole life and I've never heard about such an incident (which you think would still be fresh in our collective memory).  It seems a little unbelievable w/o a source.  64.83.234.164 23:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The websites which reference the incident are pretty much all anti-nuclear, which doesn't prove anything, but is a datum. I'll see if I can find anything in the Star-Tribune for that period.--Orange Mike 16:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Hiroshima Prefecture

message: NGKGNGK 2A02:C7C:D4E8:6000:3C5E:C59D:BDCE:3832 (talk) 14:17, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PPjll[pFIO;JGS;LKJ;LBJO;IEAHRUTGIJRFOEKGIJBDUGJDFKORT5H4WTIJEGRKFE
Talk:Joulutorttu (album)

message: I am uncertain if the use of 'excellent' is NPOV.. (though I have listened to the album and agree). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.43.202.234 (talk) 23:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Mōri Motonari

message: he needs a map showing his territoys at the time of his death. hopefully it will be in the similar style as oda nubunagas territory. i know they did not completly over lap but Mori was a very prominent regional leader. the period of time from 1560 to 1582 witness the decline of the single flief leaders and the rise of the regional leaders for japan. and even though mori did not live to see nobunaga's death by the time mori had died he was already a regional leader and owning atleast half a dozen fleifs. he deserved to get a map showing the political structure of his empire and his japanese contemporaries. 76.253.139.28 (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Sanzu River

message: Is it apprpriate to say that most Japanese people believe this?  That is, to say, I did not realize that this was still widely considered a fact, even in modern society.--Sotaru 23:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Most Japanese Believe"

message: I removed a reference to an anime series episode which had a reference to the river as I don't think it adds to the article in any way.--Swift 21:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture reference 

message: It is inappropriately Eurocentric to refer to this as a "version of the River Styx". That wording implies that the River Styx myth is a "default belief" of sorts, which it isn't--this is a separate tradition with a separate history. --Grenadier (talk) 02:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurocentrism 

message: This article goes up to the point where Datsue-ba strips the deceased of their clothes, and Keneo hangs them on a branch to determine the weight of that person's offences. But what happens next? Also, in the article about Japanese funerals it says that six coins are usually thrown into the deceased's casket, to assist them in crossing the Sanzu River, but this article doesn't explain why doing that would help.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.138.150 (talk) 02:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Keneo weighs their offences...and then what?

message: I removed a section that detailed an interpretation of the River Sanzu as interpreted by Sokka Gakkai.  As Sokka Gakkai is a fringe sect which has only started recently, and largely considered to be a cult, it seems that their interpretation should not be placed to the sole exclusion to the interpretation by more traditional sects, such as Nichiren or Zen Buddhists, and also to the exclusion of traditional Shinto interpretations.  It would be like an article on St. Peter that only includes the interpretation by Scientologists while leaving out interpretations by the Roman Catholic Church and major Protestant organizations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 240F:6:1928:1:40CC:3B1B:A805:1A8F (talk) 11:45, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  According to Soka Gakkai... 

message: Should there be a note about having "Sanzu River" also using Commonwealth grammar? ==> "River Sanzu"? 94.197.120.46 (talk) 23:52, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  River Sanzu
Talk:Assembly of the City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska

message: Actually, this article could use some mention of the panoramic photo of Mendenhall Glacier which adorns the wall directly behind where the assemblymembers sit.  I'm pretty sure that sources exist which mention the process that Ron Klein(?) undertook to make that photo in at least some detail.  Speaking of photos, an edition of the Alaska Blue Book included a photo of the Assembly, ca. 1984, in a joint meeting with the planning commission.  Since there's been little to no effort to assess the copyright status of Alaska state documents, I'm probably just pissing up a tree here.  Still, it may be worth considering as a fair use image if nothing else. RadioKAOS  –  Talk to me, Billy  03:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Your Filthy Little Mouth

message: This is a really good article.  I recommend that the whole article be copyedited for tone, to convert peacock words and original research into an encyclopedic synthesis and quote structure.Smuckola (talk) 05:45, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: First sentence of the first paragraph "...David Lee Roth, the lead singer of the American rock band Van Halen." Shouldn't it be "...David Lee Roth, the former lead singer of the American rock band Van Halen." or, more accurately, ""...David Lee Roth, the former and future lead singer of the American rock band Van Halen."" (Bold added to show the difference in the connotations.)
Point being, when this album was made Roth was not the lead singer of Van Halen. When the wiki article was written, he may have been, but that doesn't matter. He might still be the lead singer as of this writing, but I haven't checked my magic 8-ball lately to see if he was in or out or if the band Van Halen is even active right now. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 19:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Singer of Van Halen ?
Wikipedia talk:Wikiethics/Arguments

message: I think one of the main purpose of this proposal is to coherently explain current policies, as well as fill in some blanks, if there is, with consensus. It can be a good source of information for the newcommers as it provides an overall introduction regarding editing in Wiki. It can be a useful source for all editors of course. Intruction creep can be dealt with this way. Resid Gulerdem 00:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The policy covers a lot 

message: It does not because, it is explicitly stated in the policy that editors decide depending on the current policies. I quote: .. with Wiki policies in mind, an editorial consensus .... Resid Gulerdem 00:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What if it contradicts the current policies
Talk:My Brother and Me

message: I remember when I was younger I used to always watch this show every Sunday or whatever day I knew it came on. The show "My Brother and Me" was just so funny and that was years ago when I used to watch it. My favorite episode was when Dee Dee was getting messed with at school by a bully so he told his older brother and Goo what was going on. So both of them tried to show Dee Dee how to be tough so the bully would leave him alone. The advice they gave him was walk like you the man, give the bully the look and let him know that your not agraid of him, then you tell him face to face{Hit Me}!!! Dee came back home the next day with a black eye.So Alfie and Goo are asking him what happened. They asked did you give him the look? Dee Dee said{yeah}then they asked did you walk up to him like you wern't afraid? Dee Dee said{yeah}then the last question they asked him was...Did you tell him HIT ME!! Dee Dee said {yeah}again. So Goo and Alfie are looking confused and asked him so what happened? I GOT HIT! Dee Dee responed it was so funny to me. And later on during the show Alfie and Goo went up to the school to see what was going on and the bully happened to be a girl! but my point is that was a good show and I wish it would just come back on again.
                               Sincerely Ashley Howell
:Please note that this page is only for talking about the article. This post will not help get the show back on air.  — JuWiki (Talk <> Resources) 18:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bring This Show Back! 

message: only 13 episodes? wow, i never realized when i was a kid just how well nickelodeon fooled its audience by playing episodes over and over, and never really announcing new eps or the last new eps of its shows. i must've seen this show dozens of times; it felt like there were at least 25 eps or so. fuzzybunny566 00:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: only 13?

message: I believe that Alfie said "O-M-G, it's Kendall Gill!", and not "Oh my God"
Sailingsumo (talk) 06:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Celebrity Cameos
Wikipedia talk:Wikiethics/Sections

message: Wikipedia editorial standards and ethics (Wikiethics) include principles of ethics and of good practice to address the specific challenges faced by Wikipedians. Wikipedia has some editorial standards that reflects the common  heritage of human literacy. This proposal aims to outline these standards and create a policy that summarizes them. Understanding the Wiki policies coherently, their place in the whole picture and their relations to the Wiki ethics and standards are also important issues to be addressed. 
Let us start with the introduction. Do you think if the introduction is good enough? Do you have any suggestion? Resid Gulerdem 00:13, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: The following sections provide important guidelines for editing an article. It is also helpful on how to have a productive editorial discussion concerning Wikipedia articles when disputes arise.
=== Article-based classifications ===
In some cases it seems to be hard to define some particular terms like 'offensive', 'censorship', 'pornography', etc. That is why article-based classifications is the most appropriate way in doing so. Generalizations do not help as it is almost impossible to agree on the definitions of particular terms based on cultures, religions, and such. The terms used in this policy such as 'minority', 'acceptability', etc. are also article-based classifications based on the judgement of the contributing editors in that particular article. By 'majority' more than %50 of the editors is meant and the term 'consensus' refer to %75 or more of the editors voted.
Let us discuss about this section. Any suggestions to improve this part? Resid Gulerdem 06:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial guidelines

message: In some cases it seems to be hard to define some particular terms like 'offensive', 'censorship', 'pornography', etc. That is why article-based classifications is the most appropriate way in doing so. Generalizations do not help as it is almost impossible to agree on the definitions of particular terms based on cultures, religions, and such. The terms used in this policy such as 'minority', 'acceptability', etc. are also article-based classifications based on the judgement of the contributing editors in that particular article. By 'majority' more than %50 of the editors is meant and the term 'consensus' refer to %75 or more of the editors voted.
Let us discuss about this section. Any suggestions to improve this part? Resid Gulerdem 06:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article-based classifications 

message: Being responsible is a natural result of the principles given in this policy. Anonymity does not exempt any editor from these responsibilities.
It seems to be there is no objections to the sections above. We can start to Editorial Standards. Recently there was some concerns about four sections. We can start discussing those. If we can get agreement that is fine. Otherwise we may have straw polls for each section to seek the community approval. Resid Gulerdem 02:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymity
Talk:Avisodomy

message: That is all.
:Is it? What about your PENIS??? -Dan 07:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, really. The fact that such a word had to be created made me lose all faith in mankind. - Luminarie 03:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article killed my brain.