Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 41

message: I put in the missing  to correspond with the  that FuelWagon inserted, but since I had fixed the references section last time, it's current state of disarray is not my fault: Please note that the number of "ref" and "note" tags are different and the order appears messed up bigtime, major league. Therefore you all will have to learn how to use this function. Here are two short answers: #1: See Alabama Boy's help: He knows how to do it; #2: Have only the same notes as you do references -and in the same order. Here's the "long" answer: You are now a Jedi -yet you have one last yet remaining before you can complete your training: Learn the fabled art of Reference/Note links! Also, I replaced a very dull and non-controversial paragraph that Calton had continually deleted -even though it contained no "vanity" links: He didn't like hidden comments, but hidden comments aren't vanity links, and -as we recall it was his edit here! that caused the World War III that I promised would happen if he kept pushing it -and kept removing something that had absolutely no vanity links -but merely hidden comments that could not be construed as vanity links or such. You may modify that section as you lease, but do not revert or delete: It is history as all else.--GordonWatts 04:59, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: In need of assistance

message: Gordon, you keep reinserting an entire paragraph about the Schindlers motion around Terri's Law. This information is already covered in teh first paragraph of the "Government involvemnet" section 
:the Florida Legislature passed "Terri's Law,"[40] giving Governor Jeb Bush the authority to intervene in the case. Bush immediately ordered the feeding tube reinserted. Michael Schiavo opposed the Governor's intervention [41], and was represented, in part, by the ACLU. At the same time, Robert and Mary Schindler, Terri's parents attempted to intervene and participate in the "Terri's Law" case but were denied by Judge W. Douglas Baird, a Circuit Judge in the Florida 6th Circuit, the same circuit as for Judge George W. Greer. They appealed, and, on February 13, the Florida Second District Court of Appeal (2nd DCA) reversed Baird's ruling,[42] allowing them to participate. On March 17, Baird denied the Schindlers the right to intervene a 2nd time,[43] and the Schindlers, represented by the conservative American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), appealed the right to participate in the "Terri's Law" case, with the court scheduling an oral argument date for June 14.[44]
Note that Florida passed the law to allow the govorner to intervene, Michael opposed intervention, and the Schindler's attempted to get involved. Note that this paragraph already covers their motion to get involved with the "Terris Law" intervention. Note that it reports it without giving undue weight to the Schindlers, i.e. it gives both the schindlers and michael about equal weight. Note that your paragraph is redundant, talking about the same motion, the dates are the same, both involve the ACLJ, both are about the same piece of history. The only problem is that while the first paragraph reports all the different points of view around the Terri's Law intervention, your new paragraph gives the Schindlers an entire paragraph to report their point of view, again. There is no reason for this since the information is already covered in the first paragraph. You give the Schindler's motion far more weight than it deserves. Your extra paragraph is redundant. FuelWagon 15:33, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: giving Schindlers undue weight