lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ion engines

message: 'Ion Thruster' and 'Ion Engine' should be merged.  They are discussing precisely the same material.  The distinctions between the two titles are only jargon.  In engineering an engine is usually a device that employs a thermodynamic cycle to convert energy from one form to another (e.g. internal combustion engines employ either the Otto Cycle or the Diesel Cycle to convert chemical energy to mechanical energy).  Most rocket thrusters (including ion devices) employ very simple open ended thermodynamic conversions with exhaust to the free environment.  But this difference is subtle and frankly either title would be fine and both are used in the rocket propulsion community.
: The Ion thruster article is much better-developed. I've redirected this page there, as all material in this article is already covered at Ion thruster. The Ion engine article already redirects; this article fails to follow naming conventions in addition to duplicating information.--Christopher Thomas 20:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Life with Loopy

message: Life with Loopy was a life changing short show for me. The black comedy is so strong I lose it in every show. The creators did such an amazing job with making the animation corny to add to the humor; but what was the most ingenious idea was how they had real people fill in some of the parts. Whenever they needed a shot with a hand gesture or a prop, they would have real hands with latex gloves on. Life with Loopy also had some of the most hilarious plots and plot twists which definitely deserve more attention than they received. Life with Loopy was an amazing segment; funny for kids and adults alike. I think about Life with Loopy almost every day because of its broad humor ability, and hope more shows follow in its footsteps. 
68.78.108.92 16:01, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Notability not established, since no secondary sources are given. No sources added since more than half a year. Will redirect to KaBlam!; if it is relevant, then only in this context. --B. Wolterding 08:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Algoma Central Railway

message: See the relevant discussion at WP:GA/R.
--Ling.Nut 20:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article's [[WP:GA|Good Article]] status being reviewed for possible delisting. 

message: The Good Article review on this article has ended, and with a 3 to 1 vote, this article has been delisted. The primary concern was that the article wasn't well-referenced, even with the three now given after the review article. Dispute archived here:Wikipedia:Good articles/Disputes/Archive 11. Homestarmy 02:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article review
Talk:1994–95 NHL lockout

message: Any info on what the players did during the lock out? there was the 4 on 4 challenge...and Gretzky's Number 99's  played against European teams like The Jokerit.
If anyone can add some info it would be appreciated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.230.121 (talk) 04:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 94-95 lockout
Talk:EMD E9

message: I'm delisting this article from GA status because:
*no inline citations, not a requirement for GA, but generally should be used with statistics
*no lead
*not thorough; the article only allows a brief description of the train w/o going into much detail
*redundant statements like: Many E9s survive today
*needs work; example:
for hauling inspection specials, charter passenger trains, investor tours, and the like- the like has to be changed to a more approriate term
AndyZ 20:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Inline citations are now a requirement of GA status, so we'll need to work on that too now. Slambo (Speak) 21:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted GA

message: Pennsylvania Railroad E8A #5805 was wrecked at Chicago Union Station on March 10, 1954. The unit suffered a broken underframe behind the cab, a photo is on Flicker and an accident report is in the ICC train wreck database. A rebuild of this unit was accomplished on a new underframe. The same EMD serial number was used: 15669. No documentation of this rebuild has surfaced. The rebuilt unit was later renumbered PRR 4270, then PC 4270 and finally became NJTR 4270 as a parts source. The date of the rebuild likely later in 1954 is beyond any date associated with an E8A being rebuilt by EMD. The rebuild of Pennsylvania 5805 may be an undocumented E9Am. --SSW9389 (talk) 16:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Undocumented PRR 5805 wreck rebuild
Talk:General Pershing Zephyr

message: This article has been delisted for failure to meet current GA criteria. Once the article has been brought up to standards, it may be renominated at WP:GAC. If you have any questions regarding this delisting, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Additionally, if you feel this delisting was made in error, you may request remediation at WP:GA/R. Regards, LaraLoveT/C 05:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted GA
Talk:M-10001

message: This article does not meet the GA standards as they currently exist at WP:WIAGA.  Specifically:
*The article lacks inline citations, which for an article of this length, would normally be expected to meet minimum referencing requirements.  Please see WP:CITE for more information.
*Additionally, it appears no formal review of this article was ever published on this talk page, making it difficult to to see the original reviewer's rational for passing it.
Please improve the article and renominate it at WP:GAC once it has been brought up to standard.  If you feel this article should NOT have been delisted in the state it was in when this review occured, please request remediation at WP:GA/R.  Happy editing! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 04:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Delisted

message: Where are the figures on how fast this train could go? --KJRehberg (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Train top speed?
Talk:M-10003 to M-10006

message: This article does not meet the GA standards as they currently exist at WP:WIAGA.  Specifically:
*The article lacks inline citations, which for an article of this length, would normally be expected to meet minimum referencing requirements.  Please see WP:CITE for more information.
*Additionally, it appears no formal review of this article was ever published on this talk page, making it difficult to to see the original reviewer's rational for passing it.
Please improve the article and renominate it at WP:GAC once it has been brought up to standard.  If you feel this article should NOT have been delisted in the state it was in when this review occured, please request remediation at WP:GA/R.  Happy editing! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 04:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Delisted
Talk:San Diegan (train)

message: This article has been delisted for failure to meet current GA criteria. Once the article has been brought up to standards, it may be renominated at WP:GAC. If you have any questions regarding this delisting, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Additionally, if you feel this delisting was made in error, you may request remediation at WP:GA/R. Regards, LaraLoveT/C 05:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted GA

message: I'm pretty sure that a Southern Californian has a better chance of knowing this than I do, but was the current Morena/Linda Vista (San Diego Trolley station) ever a stop along the San Diegan? Feel free to send me a message on this. ----DanTD (talk) 03:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linda Vista Station today? 

message: I moved this page from San Diegan to San Diegan (train) because the most WP:COMMON use of the term is going to be for people of the city of San Diego--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 21:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved
Talk:Vinod Mehta

message: I have no idea about the factual accuracy,but they do sound dubious.Most sentences seems to be aimed at sarcasm.Care to cite any references for the claim?--Sahodaran 16:27, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The dubious tag was removed by an anon.Care to Explain?And site sources for stuff like "third class" degree and "his dog,Editor"?Of course,all this may be true,but it just needs to be authenticated.I am reverting it anyway.--Sahodaran 04:34, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Frick Collection

message: *Specific text to be added or removed: add the underlined sentence and remove the struckthrough sentences as they would then be redundant
*Reason for the change: foregrounding current event/wording
*References supporting change: 
--Infopetal (talk) 19:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ferkijel (talk) 18:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This info was added to the lede, fulfilling the edit request in March, and was subsequently removed in June. I have been in touch with the Frick recently, as we've done editathons together before, and they still feel it's very important to have something in the lede, and I do think they have a point. Perhaps something a bit shorter than the previous version, like: Its permanent collection (normally at the Henry Clay Frick House, currently at 945 Madison Avenue)...-Pharos (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this brief inclusion in the lede is important enough to include. ɱ (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to lead section to foreground relocation
Talk:Capitoline Museums

message: This article was formerly listed as a good article, but was removed from the listing because some of the sections are extremely short.  Most of the article is good, but the Capitoline museum bit needs more info, and the preceding section should be prose rather than a bulleted list. Worldtraveller 00:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article removed from [[Wikipedia:Good articles]]

message: Until November 29, 2014, the article contained this note under sources: ""Michelangelo Buonarroti", August 1, 2005 version. Wikipedia." Yngvadottir (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source note for attribution 

message: 82.177.40.11 (talk) 08:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pinacoteca, the collection of paintings, is not even mentioned.

message: This article claims that the Captoline was the 'first museum in the world, understood as a place where art could be enjoyed by all and not only by the owners'. However, in 1671 the city of Basel decided to make the art collection of the Amerbach cabinet (the Kunstmuseum Basel) accessible to the public twice a week. Blapgar (talk) 20:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Museum claim is dubious
Talk:Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne

message: Nothing about Rockstar's cracked copy being sold on steam?  98.23.142.57 (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam - Rockstar Crack 
Talk:Merlin diamond mine

message: This is a stub, there are no images. slambo 16:43, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: After reviewing history, I found it was never listed as a GA. Thus I removed the delistedGA template. -- Aeonx (talk) 02:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: @Aeonx Please undo this edit. In the past, GAs were simply user nominated with no reviewing system. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merlin_diamond_mine&oldid=25522587  this is the link to when Merlin diamond mine was listed as a GA. 48JCL (talk) 00:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted GA 
Talk:Murowa diamond mine

message: There are no images. slambo 16:45, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted GA 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
Murowa Diamond Mine, Zimbabwe
They should be:
Latitude:  20°29'28.74"S
Longitude:  30°24'10.26"E
:. The onlne sources are confusing; Google Maps and Wikimapia, for example, label the mine at the location of the coordinates that were in the article, and the aerial image here is clearly of that place. OpenStreetMap, on the other hand, shows the mine at the location you've given. The best source I've been able to find—the text and map here—definitely indicate that the mine is southeast (rather than southwest) of Zvishivane, so I'm going with your coordinates. Deor (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Orapa diamond mine

message: This is a stub, there are no images.  slambo 16:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted GA 
Talk:Jwaneng diamond mine

message: The article is a stub, there are no images. slambo 16:49, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted GA 
Talk:Calamine brass

message: There are no images. slambo 16:52, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted GA 

message: I have added detail of the hisotry of brass production in England and further (more substantial) references.  I started adding a section on this to the cementation process article, but when I found this one, I desisted, leaving a short passage leading to a cross reference.  
Peterkingiron 16:28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: addition to text
Talk:Solid solution

message: There are no references. slambo 16:54, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats because everything was taken from http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Solid_solution  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.17.181 (talk) 10:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. absoluteastronmy.com has copied this page. Read the note on their page (below "see also"). -Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 10:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted GA 

message: I added a tag on the exsolution paragraph, since exsolution redirects here. I also sugest a little cleanup here, since it looks a bit messy, with no clear introduction and no "body". I think i will write an exsolution-article when i have enough time.Gwissi 21:47, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exsolution 

message: This article seriously needs at least one example of a solid solution. I would think that hydrogen gas dissolved in e.g. palladium metal would qualify, but I'm not sure enough to put it on the page. Anyone else who could give an example of both an interstitial and a substitional solid state solution would be much appreciated. Mr0t1633 (talk) 22:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples? 

message: The IUPAC definition in the box is probably outdated.
IUPAC's Gold Book does not contain any more an entry for "solid solution". The link for "solid solution" redirects to "mixed crystal (solid solution)". Gmrozz (talk) 01:29, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed crystal (solid solution) 

message: The stub solvus is basically just a dictionary definition and has little chance of being expanded (WP:NOTDICT). Solvus refers specifically to the solubility limit of solid solutions, so I think it fits naturally within the scope of this article. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 03:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Robertjamal12 ~🔔 15:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge solvus here

message: study 27.255.21.23 (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many types of solution  

message: The article begins by stating that a solid solution is a "mixture of two different kinds of atoms" ... but shouldn't molecules also be included in this definition (e.g. NaCl, KCl, as mentioned lower in the article)? Al Begamut (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atoms only or molecules too
Talk:Chinyingi

message: In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. Unfortunately, as of 
September 16, 
2007, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAC. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GA/R. 
 
*The article is far too short to satisfy the GA "broad in coverage" criteria. More is needed on the history, the mission today, issues facing the mission, etc. 
Epbr123 09:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA delist
Talk:Eruption column

message: Does this mean a column is higher in cold weather or in hot weather? How big is the height difference between the same eruption in i.e. -30°C vs. +30°C?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:1065:B8E0:0:0:0:6E47 (talk) 04:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Column height is determined by the level at which the column density equals surrounding air density. This is usually well into the stratosphere, where temperature begins to rise with altitude and the density correspondingly drops faster with altitude. I have never seen a discussion of variation with weather or latitude, but the tropopause (base of the stratosphere) is at a higher altitude in the tropics than at higher latitudes, so eruption columns may actually be higher in the tropics than near the poles. Kent G. Budge (talk) 04:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification Needed: Column Height in relation to Atmospheric Temperature

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I believe the article currently has multiple issues that need to be addressed, and as a result, I have delisted the article. The article was passed in 2005, and since then, the criteria has been significantly expanded. The main reason for delisting is the lack of inline citations throughout the article. Multiple paragraphs are unsourced throughout. To improve the article, add additional sources from a variety of sources to provide a balanced representation of the information present. Perhaps sources can be pulled from the main articles linked to within the article. Look to books, magazines, newspaper articles, other websites, etc. In addition, see if any other images can be added to the article for some of the other sections, I'm sure there are some great ones out there. Although it has been delisted, the article can be return to GA status by addressing the above points. Once sources are added and cleanup is done, I recommend renominating the article at WP:GAN. If you need assistance with any of these issues, please contact me on my talk page and I'll do my best to help you out. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps: Delisted
Talk:Iceland hotspot

message: This must have been reviewed ages ago, it's shocking that a relatively short article with no inline-citations could get GA status. The Anahim hotspot is even better than this article and it's rated B class. Black Tusk 04:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: From the history, it was given the good article tag in late 2005. Inline cites have come into fashion since then. I agree it doesn't seem to meet current standards. -- Avenue (talk) 22:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: More fundamentally, throughout the article the observed "hotspot" evidence is confused with one possible cause, a "plume".  Recent work by people such as Anderson and Foulger opens up other possible causes. The article seems considerably removed from GA quality; it could benefit by distinguishing between observed hotspot (facts) and the various possible causes (hypotheses). Feline Hymnic (talk) 22:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably better if the article would be rated start class insted of GA class. I have seen other volcano articles that don't seem to meet current standards, such as Mount Baker and Mount Nyiragongo; they are relatively short and have very few inline-citations. Black Tusk 03:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I've just re-structured the article to separate observation (hotspot etc.) from possible theories (plume etc.). All the original material should still be there, but re-ordered, structurally prepared for expansion and development. Also the plume theory already has its own article, Iceland plume, so I've cross-referenced that.  Feline Hymnic (talk) 12:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article? 

message: I recommend a merger of Iceland hotspot into Iceland plume (or vice-versa), as both appear to deal with the same phenomena.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.171.199 (talk) 20:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - just what I cam here to say. 86.140.128.144 (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend Merger 

message: Quote: "It is proposed that the line Grímsvötn volcano to Surtsey shows the movement of the Eurasian Plate" (North-South orientation). I do not like this concept, as the Eurasian Plate and the North American Plate are moving relative to each other in a East-West orientation. I'd prefer the notion that the Reykjanes Ridge and Iceland's West Volcanic Zone is inactive rift in the future, and Iceland's West Volcanic Zone is a borning rift. So the Mid-Atlantic Ridge is moving its place. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 08:35, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: After , the Mid-Atlantic Ridge is moving westwards. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 07:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative motion 

message: "As well as being a region wierdest but best of higher temperature than the surrounding mantle..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taliska (talk • contribs) 13:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Twas a bit of vandalism - fixed. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 14:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't undertand this :-(
Talk:Canadian Bar Association

message: There is an important distinction to be made between bar associations and law societies in Canada (the previous "see also" section of this article, as well as the categorization of some Canadian law articles, suggests that there may be some confusion on this point).  A bar association is an advocacy/professional body that acts in the interests of the legal profession - typically the membership is voluntary.  A law society is a regulatory body, usually established by statute, that oversees the legal profession - in order to practice law, a lawyer must be a member of the law society.  In other words, a bar association serves the interests of lawyers, whereas a law society serves the public interest.  A law society can bring disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer, while a bar association cannot.
The confusion arises because the terms are often used differently in other countries, and in Canada are often used interchangeably by non-lawyers.  Moreover, in a generic sense, a law society is a bar association of a sort.  Further, the expression "called to the bar" (to denote that a lawyer has received the proper qualifications to practice law) implies, when used in Canada, that it is the bar association that does the calling (when, in fact, it's the law society).  Further confusing the issue is the fact that the body that serves the law society function in Quebec, the Barreau du Québec, translates in English as the Bar of Quebec.  
I have sorted the Canada-related categories for law societies and bar associations.  Please let me know if I have missed anything.  Thanks.  --Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bar associations versus Law societies