lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of EastEnders characters (2002)

message: I saw the episode where Clive Mitchell appears (Lisa exit episode) recently, and although I recall his wife, Elaine, being mentioned by Peggy, I don't remember him or Peggy saying anything about Harry and Charlie, or him giving his year of birth. Can anyone shed any light on where these additions came from? 86.136.123.224 (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Did Elaine appear on screen? Did she speak? You could be right about Harry and Charlie because when the entry was first written, there was no mention of him having children, and when Roxy and Ronnie were first announced, we assumed they were Clive's daughters. Later someone added "Peggy asked about his two children", and someone mentioned his unnamed wife and the bit about his children being worse than Phil and Grant. The children's names were added in August 2009. These were all anonymous edits. But if you've seen it recently and there was no mention of children, we should get rid of them. The year of birth is probably made up as well. AnemoneProjectors 16:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Peggy introduced Clive and Elaine to someone but we only saw the back of her head and she didn't speak. I'm 99% sure that Harry, Charlie, him not seeing Phil or Sam for years and the DOB are all made up. I think Peggy did ask after his kids, but don't recall her saying that they were worse than Phil and Grant, or even specifying what gender they were. I saw the episode in April so I'm sure I would remember all that information. It's been removed from YouTube now though so I can't watch it again to be sure. 86.136.123.224 (talk) 23:07, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Shame it's not on youtube. Madge Mitchell was in the same episode, right? But she never spoke either. I don't think we should add Elaine or Madge as characters. But I think we should base Clive's bio on what you saw. AnemoneProjectors 23:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Clive Mitchell
Talk:Coal mine bump

message: What's the point of stating, "Many geologists believe that the current disaster at the Crandall Canyon Mine in Emery County, Utah was caused by retreat mining and a subsequent mountain bump"?  This looks like personal opinion and rank speculation in the absence of any factual evidence.  It's not like seismic events and even mountain bumps from mines can't be caused by other events.  In fact, in this article itself, it is stated that support pillars can collapse causing bumps.  Unless factual support can be added, the speculation should be removed.  75.72.47.128 15:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I take your point in that the footnote reference from KSL doesn't say what the cause was, but what the cause wasn't:  "The University of California at Berkeley tonight confirms what seismologists have said from the beginning: The collapse inside the Crandall Canyon Mine was not caused by an earthquake." I suggest we reword accordingly.  If other seismologists are more hesitant in their conclusions or do think an earthquake was involved, that fact should be added with its own reference-Barte 16:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

text: "Temblor" (no "r") is another word for "tremor" or "earthquake".  See here. -- HiEv 13:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion? 

message: This is a term I had never heard of before the Utah mine incident.  Its not a proper industry term, what you are refering to is more commonly called a rock burst, although coal miners sometimes refer to them as 'bumps' or bounces not mountain bumps.  The reason is you can usually feel them is that the siesmic waves are transmitted to your body.  Anyway it seems this term was used in this incident by an offical (I don't know who) and propogated by the media, as a google search will show. Djoeyd114 22:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the article cites two sources, one from 1987 and one from 1973 that both use the term "coal mine bump," so the term does predate the Utah mine incident.  Personally, I think "coal mine bump" or "mine bump" should be the article title, instead of "mountain bump."  (Note that coal mine bump does redirect here already.) -- HiEv 07:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bump is a mining term, my comment above states Mountain bump is not a proper term.  Cheers Djoeyd114 21:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Secondly, coal mine bump should be the main article, and Mountain bump should redirect to it.  Just change the order...Djoeyd114 17:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  "Mountain bump" is now "Coal mine bump". -- HiEv 22:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you sir! Cheers Djoeyd114 15:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mountain Bump 

message: If it is also known as Rock burst, than the two articles should be merged. If there is a distinction it is not AKA.
Mwm424 (talk) 02:25, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock burst as an AKA?
Talk:Baillie Gifford

message: I'm not sure if this is relevant, but about 1/4th of the assets they manage are the Chinese search engine Baidu.
TOP INSTITUTIONAL HOLDERS
Holder	Shares	% Out	Value*	Reported
BAILLIE GIFFORD AND COMPANY	24,650,280	7.09	$14,716,217,160	Mar 31, 2010
Jeff Carr (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baidu ownership
Talk:Volga German people

message: Consider redirection, as anyone active linking Volga Germans as opped to Volga German get a blank page. Eiri Amach 16:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm waiting for Volga Germans (currently a redirect page) to be deleted so that Volga German can be moved there. Once that's done both Volga German and this article could be redirects to Volga Germans, I guess. -- Hux 16:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chinese crocodile lizard

message: Hi! I made changes to the article including renaming the "reproduction and copulation" section as just "reproduction" as well as moving it under the "behavior" heading to clarify section structure. I also made grammatical and stylistic edits throughout, particularly in the "behavior," "reproduction," and "conservation" sections. LewisWang4 (talk) 21:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: This article states that this species is CITES 1 while the source cited says it is currently CITES 2 76.121.92.120 (talk) 07:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CITES status
Talk:Trunk road

message: If you click on "Deutsch" you get to this German article: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobahn%C3%A4hnliche_Stra%C3%9Fe
If you then click on "English" you get to this English article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway
Somehow, "Trunk road" and "Dual carriageway" would be the same in German then. Is that correct? Should any change be done? QuéSéYo2 (talk) 05:40, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they're not the same thing -- but, in any case, the interwiki link has since been changed and now leads to :de:Außerortsstraße. Once again, this is not really the same thing: it's, more or less literally, an "out-of-town" or extra-urban road -- so, any road between places, whatever its ranking (motorway to country lane) but somewhat closer to the English-language meaning of "trunk road". Personally, I'd say a trunk road was a Fernverbindungsstraße -- but the German Wp doesn't currently have an article of that name. -- Picapica (talk) 09:30, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

message: In the Swedish National Road Database (select "Stamväg" in the menu to the right), Riksväg 26 Kristinehamn–Mora is not indicated to be a trunk road. See also this map from 2014, where Riksväg 26 is not indicated as a trunk road north of Kristinehamn, and discussion on Swedish Wikipedia. The source (p. 31) only states that "Väg 26 ingår i det nationella stamvägnätet" [Route 26 is part of the national trunk road network], nothing about it being a trunk road "all the way". Querii (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riksväg 26
Talk:2007 United Soccer Leagues

message: Why is there not any promotion and relegation between divisions 1 & 2?
Every other country in the world has at least got some promotion within lower-divisions if they are run by the same organisation (i.e. the SFL in Scotland). Please could you respond to my userpage, thanks Dreamweaverjack (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotion & Relegation
Talk:Dover (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Why has this article been renamed "Dover and Deal"?  Just about every third party site I've seen referencing this constituency (from the BBC to local newspapers) has it down as just "Dover", including the Dover district council website, as seen by the declaration of poll results on its website.  For now I've refrained from moving the page back myself, but I'm pretty sure it's just called "Dover".  Think777 (talk) 19:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've decided to move the page back to "Dover".  All the sources I've seen mentioning this constituency refer to it as just "Dover", and not "Dover and Deal".  Think777 (talk) 13:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the Constituency Name
Talk:Uyunqimg

message: Wouldn't her name look more like Оюнчимэг (or probably Оюунчимэг)? Yaan 16:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answering to myself, the correct form should be Оюунчимэг. Mongolians frequently transcribe ю to y instead of yu, so I guess giving Oyunchimeg as alternative transcription, instead of Oyuunchimeg, should be acceptable, even if it is incompatibe with WP:MON. Yaan (talk) 11:10, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  name in cyrillic Mongolian
Talk:2007–08 Coppa Italia

message: Thank you to all who have been helping update scores as matches are played.  Lots of these one-leg ties are going to penalty shootouts.  To be consistent with last year's Coppa article and other soccer tournament articles elsewhere on Wikipedia, we should follow this format: indicate the number of goals scored in regulation + extra time as usual, and then the number of penalties scored only in parentheses afterward.  This is more informative than putting the combined score of regulation goals and penalties in parentheses.  If anyone has comments or a problem with this format, just reply here on the talk page. —Ed Cormany 16:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation for penalty shootouts 
Talk:South West Surrey (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I was a party member in SW Surrey that selected Gavin Scott https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Scott (a 34-year-old Channel Four newscaster, whose speciality was international trade) to contest the 1984 by-election.  The previous candidate was author George Scott, whom Maurice Macmillan defeated comfortably.  It confused the Conservative campaign considerably to find a different candidate with nearly the same name. Elmbeard (talk) 09:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1983 Election 

message: Is there any policy that stops us creating the Farnham and Bordon article now, for the new constituency in the next general election? cagliost (talk) 17:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farnham and Bordon
Talk:List of recurring characters on seaQuest DSV

message: Where's Darwin? 24.64.174.133 16:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm inclined to agree with Kyle C Haight. TTN says it can be adequately covered in the main article yet undertakes no effort to start up a discussion on how to proceed. Simply blanking and redirecting is not the way to go. Please stop blanking the page so some constructive work can be done.--Fogeltje (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit war

message: I think it would be useful to start making episode citations for the facts named with the characters.--Fogeltje (talk) 11:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: I've currently protected several pages, including this one, for three days in response to edit wars over non-free image use. Please try to resolve these issues through discussion and the dispute resolution process. Relevant discussion at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#Edit-warring and elsewhere; please participate there instead of risking further page locks and user blocks. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected 

message: Having per-character images on lists such as this has been deprecated for a long time now. Wikipedia:NFC#Non-free_image_use_in_list_articles was created in part to outline current practice in this regard, and to clarify Wikipedia's handling of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria #3 and #8. This list is out of compliance with the guideline and policy and needs to have the images removed. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreeed, obviously.  HiDrNick! 17:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Criteria #3 is adhered to, They didn't shoot promo pictures of recurring characters, let alone group photos of recurring characters and it is a Low resolution screen cap, both of these facts meet #3A and 3B. As for #8 "Significance", learning who is who is the point of the article. To quote "its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic". Seeing who it is is much better than giving a 2 paragraph description of the person (A picture is worth a thousand words) and if these were individual pages this wouldn't be a problem. If they were made into seperat page then people would be complaining about notability. Dr. Stantz (talk) 14:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

text: *Article after article after article akin to this one has had images removed. 23 fair use images on this article can not be justified as "minimal" usage. The argument that since their are no group photos, it's ok to break our policies and guidelines is simply not acceptable. The images in the article must be trimmed in accordance with Wikipedia:NFC#Non-free_image_use_in_list_articles. I recommend trimming to only the top 3-4 most important recurring characters. If this isn't done, somebody not familiar with the series will do it. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image removals
Talk:Busbridge

message: Hydestile isn't a linear settlement. 31.52.254.82 (talk) 22:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydestile
Talk:Bo Cai (rebel)

message: I was reading a research book on Yellow Turban rebels. It says Bo Cai joined the rebels because he was raped, and the Han government laughed at him and told him to get lost, and refused to do justice upon a rapist. I don't remember the book's name though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.189.75 (talk) 02:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In which case there is no reliable source.  In any case, the way you wrote it was unencyclopedic.  --Nlu (talk) 16:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rape
Talk:Masjid Al-Iman

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20150219085238/http://www.muis.gov.sg/cms/services/Mosques.aspx?id=308. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 01:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Audio signal

message: "In professional audio, the lower the impedance of a circuit, the better."
That's quite the sweeping statement, and clearly incorrect in any number of situations. Maybe someone would like to put a more accurate version of that back in.
Tabby (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Impedance quote

message: "Digital audio signal being sent through wire can use several formats including optical (ADAT, TDIF), coaxial (S/PDIF), XLR (AES/EBU), and ethernet, especially for large digital audio consoles."
I'm a bit confused on this issue.  Is the S/PDIF standard applicable to both optical mediums as well as coaxial mediums?  Xetxo (talk) 22:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: TOSLINK is the optical version of S/PDIF. I have reworked the paragraph to be more complete and to more clearly explain the dimensions. ~Kvng (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Digital equivalent SPDIF
Talk:Anti-Jewish legislation in pre-war Nazi Germany

message: Does anybody know why the names Jews had to bear were chosen to be "Israel" and "Sara"?  Why not any other "typical Jewish" names like "David" or "Judith"?  --Alfe (talk) 10:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Israel" and "Sara"? 

message: where is a discussion of this to be found in Wikipedia? Were the laws simply passed without legal challenges?--Jrm2007 (talk) 23:23, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenges to this legislation 

message: Hello, a lot of help is needed in finding, naming and describing the 400+ anti-Jewish laws and decrees in a new-style timeline similar to that in Timeline of the far future. I suggest using ÖNB-ALEX for Reichsgesetzblatt reference URLs. --Minoa (talk) 20:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline of anti-Jewish legislation and movements in pre-war Germany
Talk:List of busiest Amtrak stations

message: Daily?  Yearly?  Hourly Boarding/Deboarding?  I would have though the need for units was clear in this case.  161.184.175.149 16:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many of these stations are also served by commuter rail and public transit rail systems.  Do these numbers *only* reflect Amtrak traffic, or these other systems as well? --Jfruh (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm quite sure these numbers are a measurement of Amtrak ticket sales.  Otherwise, they'd state otherwise. --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Just Amtrak?
Talk:W79 Artillery-Fired Atomic Projectile

message: Chuck Hansen in his "Secret History" book used the words there, and they were preceded by an earlier reference. Don't expect to see a literature chain of more detail; that was made more classified. People took too much of popular histories to heart not realizing that the development of nuclear weapons progressed (more: how it progressed) following the Mark I Little Boy and Mark III Fat Man.  The header can be removed because it is covered in a little more detail in other parts of wikipedia. 143.232.210.150 (talk) 20:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No, this is not original research
Talk:Moncton Aigles Bleus

message: Is there a reason why the article is "Moncton Aigles Bleu" and not "Bleus" as noted in the article itself?  PKT(alk) 18:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:DMD

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.107.100 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes; added: Doctor of Dental Medicine (appears in section See also); that page doesn't use periods in the abbreviation, British English style.  -- Deborahjay (talk) 20:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Content moved to section Science and medicine - only difference between DMD and D.M.D. is British English vs American English punctuation style. -- Deborahjay (talk) 07:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Does DMD relate to DDS?

message: Not sure how to add this. There's a page, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, but nothing yet for the DMDs used to treat Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Don't know whether such drugs are used to treat other, e.g. neurodegenerative conditions. How to proceed? -- Deborahjay (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disease-modifying Drug
Talk:Vicky de Lambray

message: Given that there has been a fair amount of comment about VdL over the years, in a number of national newspapers/magazines in the UK for example, I don't agree with the tag and will remove it. However I don't agree with the article as it currently stands either - too much fluff - so suggest that whoever tagged have a go at Wikifying the article (which would be a more reasonable tag, I would have thought) Testbed 17:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable enough
Talk:Rolls-Royce Eagle (1944)

message: According to Gunston's book on Rolls-Royce aero engines, the stroke of this engine was 5.125" (slightly more than 130mm) and so the displacement was 2817 cubic inches or about 46.16 litres. 217.205.121.71 17:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm wondering what the bore and stroke really are? The 5.4 bore might mean they used Merlin pistons. 5.4x5.125=2816.971ci. 137mm x 130mm = 2806.625ci. 5.4in=137.16mm / 5.125in=130.175mm AMCKen (talk) 01:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where is the name Eagle 22 coming from? In Fly Navy, Ray Williams refers to it as the R-R 46 Eagle. Emoscopes Talk 12:07, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably from Gunston's small "World Encyc. of Aero Engines", where the photo of this Eagle is captioned as a "Mk 22". However I think that's a Mk within the late-war Eagle series, not a defining identifier for the engine overall. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would make sense, R-R used even numbered marks for clockwise rotating engines. I don't see why the article should use 22 to disambiguate this against the earlier Eagle (anyway I think it's against the convention), so I'm going to move it over to Rolls-Royce Eagle (1944). Emoscopes Talk 21:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Officially it was known as the "Eagle Mk. XXII" (22).   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.172.166 (talk) 09:14, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

text: The Eagle XX (20) had been a planned larger version of the Rolls-Royce Eagle XVI.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.11.216 (talk) 09:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Eagle 22?