lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:L&YR Class 21

message: Judging by the illustration, I would say that the engine is not one of these, but instead an LMS Kitson 0-4-0ST from the Stanier era. Should I put the information about Pug in the railway series on the Kitson 0-4-0ST page, and remove it from this one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notsoboxy (talk • contribs) 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pug" from the Railway Series 

message: The lead paragraph contained a sentence stating “… diameter boiler pressed to 140 lbf/in2 (965 kPa) powering …” I corrected it to “… diameter boiler pressured to 140 lbf/in2 (965 kPa) powering …” and it was reverted. Before I risk an edit war can someone explain how a boiler can be 'pressed'. (Well it can. That's how they make them. But they press at tons/sq in to bend the steel.) Comments please. OrewaTel (talk) 05:53, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Pressed to" is a term that is commonly used in reputable sources about railway locomotives. "Pressured to" is what you do to coerce somebody to act against their own free will. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen it and it makes no sense. Which sources? Perhaps 'Pressured at' is better than 'Pressured to'. Even better is to rewrite the sentence in standard English. OrewaTel (talk) 21:25, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malapropism
Talk:Latin American Idol season 1

message: Ideally, wouldn't this article have more images?
Someone nominated :File:Heide .jpg, an image of Heide Pollidore, one of the contestants not considered a "finalist", claiming it wasn't within the comons scope.  Does her participation in this show lft her from being a non-notable nobody?  I think so.
Does an image of her belong in this article, when it lacks images of the finalists?  I don't know.  I added a thumbnail, next to her name.  Geo Swan (talk) 13:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Images...
Talk:Cuban Democracy Act

message: A single Congressman cannot pass a law. I suggest cleaning up the first sentence.-Geoffrey Spear 19:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, thanks. It was a rush job and I didn't read it back.--Zleitzen 20:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Why? - 2A00:23C5:E406:3700:E86C:89BE:4BCB:3CDB (talk) 00:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello,
This article lacks a lot of specific information on the greater context of the Act itself. I plan to rearrange the article into three distinct sections, including a "Context" section for a better understanding of how Cuban-U.S. relations specifically led to the creation of the article, a "Contents" section that succinctly summarizes the provisions of the act, and a "Legacy" section to give the effects the acts had on both the Cuban economy and U.S. politics. Through that, I will also integrate some journal articles from the time the act passed to assert the legal and professional reactions from the act. Aside from that, some other sources I will use are the signing statement by President Bush for the law as well as a reference book to clean up the start of the article. Zperrier25 (talk) 12:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sections, Greater Context and Detail
Talk:Thomas Boston

message: The adjective extreme in the phrase "extreme particular redemptionists" might be considered as POV. One either holds to limited atonement or to universal atonement, so the word extreme doesn't provide any additional content.  Even though this is copied verbatim from a public domain source, I think the page would be more NPOV if this word were to be deleted. DFH 19:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of 'extreme'? 

message: An interesting article.  I am one of Thomas Boston's 7 x great grandchildren.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.120.198 (talk) 08:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descendants
Talk:Withlacoochee State Trail

message: I've got a better idea for an infobox below:
Let me know what you think of it. ----20:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New infobox proposed 

message: I just found this pic of the trail in Floral City before it was paved. I don't have permission to post the picture, so I'll just post the link (http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=1541356). It's from April 30, 1989. -----------User:DanTD (talk)  15:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  After the rails and before the trail 

message: The trail ends south of Reutimann Automotive Recycling, at this address:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Reutimann+Automotive+Recycling/@28.4483718,-82.18824,15z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0xac5215140e2f90fe!8m2!3d28.4483661!4d-82.1882155
As you can see at the map, this is south of the village of Trilby. Dade City is actually south of this location.Dogru144 (talk) 15:14, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Exact spot for the southern terminus of the trail
Talk:Plurality criterion

message: The article had no references, but I tracked some down and added them.  I'm not sure if this article is noteworthy.  It's really only used in Voting Matters, an online IRV advocacy publication. For the time being, I'll assume that it is and try to improve it.
Also, the definition is a little confusing--if someone has a better way to word this, I'd appreciate it. Gregarious (talk • contribs) 20:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Without prejudice against this article, Voting Matters is very well described as an "IRV advocacy publication".  I can think of few phrases so well suited to describe it.  I like reading it, but I always have to keep its point of view in mind.  It may choose to present itself as agnostic between STV/IRV and other methods, but that's like calling MoveOn.org nonpartisan. CRGreathouse (t | c) 00:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:Liverpool, Crosby and Southport Railway

message: There is a bit of confusion, as I see it, between this article on the one hand, and the articles about Seaforth, New Strand, Oriel Rd, and Bankhall, but not Sandhills (which agreed with here). Those articles refer to the LC&SR having its first southern terminal at Waterloo, while this article has the first terminal near Waterloo Goods Station, which was close to the present Sandhills station. These are not the same station by any means despire the similar names. Waterloo Station was named for the Waterloo Hotel (in Crosby), while Waterloo Goods was named for the Waterloo Dock (in Liverpool). In the course of this delving, I've undone one of Rm2033's apparently bot edits changing Waterloo links to London Waterloo, and as the majority of articles about these stations use the current Waterloo (Merseyside) article as their target, I've gone along with that. I've also changed  (for consistency) the Waterloo link in the Sandhills article, as it was to the Waterloo Goods station (which is on a different line altogether. All the stations listed now link to Waterloo railway station (Merseyside). If people knowing more about this area come to a decision about it, the articles about the five stations or the article here about the company will have to be amended. Sarandone2 (talk) 21:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waterloo vs Waterloo Goods
Talk:Rutherford model

message: Please see this page for more talk articles. Anarchyte (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive 1 created

message: Both externals lead to the university website where the article is not found  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planex1832 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links are dead 404 

message: After reading this article twice, I find that it does not belong in the Category of "Obsolete scientific theories," and therefore I have removed the category from this article.--71.36.99.75 (talk) 22:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is this? The theory is no longer used, and the current atomic model is the cloud model. I think that this qualifies as obsolete, unless there is some other category for no-longer used scientific theories. 50.90.74.156 (talk) 01:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: why alpha particles are not deflected by electrons Kanchan Kothari (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Theoretically, they could be, but the charge is so spread out and the electron mass so much smaller that any effects from the electron cloud are basically negligible. 166.181.82.127 (talk) 06:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete? 

message: What is the blunder of Rutherford's atomic nature Max Yusuf (talk) 04:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blunder 

message: Niel Bohr model of atom 197.215.27.63 (talk) 20:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @197.215.27.63  why alpha particle was not difflected by electrons? Kanchan Kothari (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry 

message: The 3D animation is vastly distorted for the purpose of this article. The nucleus is 20,000 to 60,000 times smaller than the electron cloud. See Atomic nucleus. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  3D animation of an atom
Talk:David Hare (playwright)

message: On Nicole Farhi's page, her nationality is given as French of Algerian descent; on her husband David Hare's page, it's stated as Algerian. Which is it? 86.133.214.216 (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife's nationality

message: *Slag (1970) Slag, is a biting satire in which the only characters are the three teachers of a tiny isolated girl's school. To protest the dominance and abusive treatment by men epitomized by the slur as "slags," they vow to abstain from sexual intercourse.  Feminism and dominance are ridiculed alike, as the conflicts among the teachers' different visions of radical feminism and their teaching become the grist for duplicitous dominant and abusive acts among them, while the number of pupils in the resulting dysfunctional environment dwindles to zero.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.165.11.161 (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub for separate article on ''Slag'' which, though linked, does not exist. 

message: I did not see in this article a reference to David Hare's modern version of Henrik Ibsen's Peer Gynt called "Peter Gynt". Vorbee (talk) 18:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Peter Gynt
Talk:Sooty shearwater

message: I don't have the time for it but someone should include facts from this article as it explains the muttonbird has the longest migratory path of any bird. Supposedly 46,000 miles. Jack 20:13, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: done by MPF, 40,000 miles, should be jimfbleak 05:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest annual migration 

message: According to his article, it's 350 km per day and not 910 as stated in the BBC article. I'll try to find other information.
http://news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=1835952006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bigmak (talk • contribs) 13:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  daily maximum distance traveled. 

message: What does it mean that the wingspan is 94-19cm? Is this a typo or is this a common way to specify wingspans? In the latter case it should be expalined somewhere.
--46.115.69.221 (talk) 05:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be a typo. I've restored it to the previous range of 94-100 cm.-gadfium 06:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wingspan 
Talk:Glass and Amber

message: Some of the text I have submitted here is identical to the text of a comment I posted on Amazon describing this book.  It's not a copyright violation because the license I granted Amazon when I posted my comment is non-exclusive. JD Lisa 20:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Greek and Turkish named places)

message: What are we going to do to draw people's attention to this discussion?
*Post a notice to all article talk pages of the articles involved?
*Post a notice to people who have previously participated in related debates / edit-wars?
*Post a notice to the Greek / Turkish Wikipedians' notice boards or Wikiprojects? (don't even know if there is a Turkish one.)
*Post a notice to Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)?
Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How to advertise this page?
Talk:Poland (album)

message: I am contesting the speedy delete.  The tag was added one minute after the article was created and no reason given by User:63.23.13.114.  --Gadget850 ( Ed) 20:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete

message: Not sure what dates you are using for the TD albums, but i think both Poland and Heartbreakers are 1984? --Echosmoke (talk) 09:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  release 

message: A copy of Relativity 88561-8045-2 has been sitting in my local used CD store for months...
bought it this weekend for $4.  Not so difficult to find; maybe I'm lucky.
It is as described, *except* "Rare Bird" is NOT split into a separate track.  The track
listing on the CDs is correct.
Disc one:  Poland (22:29), Tangent (19:59)
Disc two:  Barbakane (18:00), Horizon (21:07)
My casual listen indicates this CD is identical to the vinyl release.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.73.160.73 (talk) 00:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relativity 88561-8045-2 (1984) 

message: Interesting observation concerning these two pieces. Playing "Polish Dance" backwards, it definitely sounds like they've included a backward sample from "Choronzon". If only we had the composers' insights into this. Lee M (talk) 20:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish Dance / Choronzon
Talk:Bobby Chacon

message: This article needs a major rewrite, using neutral language and citations. CovenantD 22:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll get right on it, j/k. --Threeafterthree (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV and unsourced tags

message: Due to the death of this person, the BLP status of this article has changed. This does not mean that unsourced material that would contravene the Biography of Living Persons rules can be added to this article Capitalistroadster (talk) 22:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP status change
Talk:Bobby Cruz

message: I removed Robert "Bobby" Cruz Feliciano from Persondata because it was not mentioned in the article. If this is his real and full name then it should appear within the article, preferably with a citation.  Periglio (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full name 
Talk:1984 Italian Grand Prix

message: Jo Gartner and Gerhard Berger finished 5th and 6th in this GP, but didn't recieve their 2 and 1 points (see also ). 
If they were disqualified, why weren't the positions and points given to Piercarlo Ghinzani and Huub Rothengatter? Fred Bradstadt 20:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They weren't disqualified - they were driving their teams' "second entry" and because those teams had only entered one car for the entire championship, the second entry was ineligible to score points. (taken from article) Bobby Doorknobs 19:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jo Gartner & Gerhard Berger
Talk:Odobenocetops

message: Is it just me or does "Odobenocetops" mean 'whale-like walrus' or 'whale-face walrus'? Jerkov 20:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name translation 

message: "It might have been used to search out food, or as a sensory organ like narwhal tusks."
This statement doesn't make a whole lot of sense. How could it do either of these things, when the tusk is pointed backward alongside its body? 71.217.98.158 00:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tusk use 

message: Could the external link be removed, please...? It's inaccessible anyway - I've already tried it... Noble Korhedron 21:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link removal request
Talk:Mercury Man

message: Thanks for uploading or contributing to :Image:Mercurymanposter.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 11:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:Mercurymanposter.jpg]]

message: Production notes Erik (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production notes 
Category talk:Villages in Somerset

message: How is it you have "Sheepway" listed as a village (it is not; I lived in the area for about 7-8 years) but you don't have Portishead (which I know is a village, I lived there for about 20 years) - Anon
:Sheepway is listed as a Hamlet - there is no category for Hamlets in Somerset so I guess that someone has included it as a village - possibly the most appropriate category?; Portishead is listed as a Town. If these are wrong, then what we need is a knowledgeable editor to appear and correct these items, based on verifiable facts. Thanks, Ian Cairns 20:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

message: This has been omited from the list but I do not know how to add it!
Adresia 15:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sparkford

message: This has been omited from the list but I do not know how to add it! Blackford is a village a mile to the east of Compton Pauncefoot and is part of the Compton Pauncefoot & Blackford Civil Parish. However it exists in its own right with a church, approx 35 houses and Reading Room (village hall).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.18.189 (talk) 09:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blackford
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Eliza Orlins

message: Except for the part about the citation being needed (a list of birth dates is always available from each season), I say KEEP. Messy Thinking 20:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it possible to have the name link to the Survivor Vanuatu page, as several players who did once have their own articles achieved? Messy Thinking 23:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Since you said Delete:
Talk:The Cambridge History of English and American Literature

message: this entry is incorrect the history is rewritten every 50 years or so. sacvan bercovitch did the last one around 2000.
:Sort of, the Bercovitch edition was called The Cambridge History of American Literature but your right the newer editions should be mentioned - I originally intended the article only for 1907-21 edition, like Encyclopedia Britannica Eleventh Edition - but it might make sense to expand it to include the series. -- Stbalbach 22:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:List of county roads in DuPage County, Illinois

message: The table will be cleaned up quite a bit. Also there is no Illinois County Highways WikiProject, so it will be bumped up to WP:ILSR —Rob (talk) 20:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. Table also needs things like orientation, major cities, length, notes... —Rob (talk) 20:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-Do 

message: Analyze and import as is necessary. —Rob (talk) 17:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raw data 
Talk:Oldham Branch Railway

message: The Middleton Junction and Oldham Branch Railway never existed, the line was a branch line of the Manchester and Leeds Railway. The page should be renamed Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Oldham Branch or Manchester and Leeds Railway Oldham Branch (the L&NWR also had an Oldham Branch) or simply be put in the M&LR page under the sub heading of Middleton Junction and Oldham Branch replacing the existing Oldham branch section, with some suitable editing, most of this information is duplicated there. I'll propose the renaming. Nempnet (talk) 12:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railway or Branch?
Talk:Citadel High School

message: I'll be going here next year! You can count on me to update it when I do. :) --24.89.237.100 01:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Riley Halpin: Don't vandalize Buddy. Thank you. (Yohowithrum (talk) 00:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:The Golden Legend (cantata)

message: I have removed a sentence that reads: "Another interesting piece of information about The Golden Legend is that Clara Butt made her professional debut in the piece." This info is relevant to the article on the formidable Dame Clara, but not, me judice to this one. Happy to discuss if anyone demurs. Tim riley (talk) 11:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dame Clara
Talk:General Motors A platform (FWD)

message: I removed the racist reference contained in the 1st paragraph.
I'm pretty sure the vans were based on the W-Body.
Second generation (1997-2005) U vans were based on the W cars, first generation (1990-1996) were A-based.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.183.14 (talk) 05:29, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:A World Lit Only by Fire

message: This article is no longer a stub, but it still needs attention. There's a little too much "he says", "Manchester says", probably because it was written as a book-report-like summary. Does the book have a thesis? How does it relate to the author's other works, like Magellan? What is the significance of the title? How was it received/reviewed? Katherine Tredwell 21:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not reviewed in positive light for the most part.  You see, in the introduction, he admits that he started with a thesis and then looked for whatever would back it up.  It makes a variety of historical mistakes, such as getting dates wrong and certain people's ranks incorrect.  It spends 50 pages talking about the dirty sex life everyone had back then.  Most people are willing to admit that it is not objective, as he speculates a lot, and that it bounces from topic-to-topic.  Others feel that it's spectacular.  http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316545562/ref=dp_return_2/002-8934954-5729668?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books --DarkAdonis255 13:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to make it sound less like a book review and more like an encyclopedia article. It'd be nice if someone could review and give an opinion as to whether the cleanup tag is still necessary. Aesshen 16:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Soft butch

message: I propose that we should merge the content of this article with Stone butch and then just call it butch. Then it could be about all masculine lesbian genders. Matinee71 (talk) 20:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't merge. I like the specificity  Jaydennnn42 (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge ? 

message: What a stem in simple words 165.57.80.154 (talk) 06:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lesbians