lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Enoch Seminar

message: The article shall not be deleted. The Enoch Seminar is not just an ordinary scholarly seminar, but a very prominent school or movement of contemporary theological and biblical thought similar to such theological schools, like the Religionsgeschichtliche Schule or Wissenschaft des Judentums movement which already have their entries in the WiKi. So it is natural to include an entry on the Enoch Seminar too. 
About the question of lacking the sources/references to the Enoch Seminar, it should be said that a lot of references to the Enoch Seminar are circulating in the paper publications, monographs, articles in refereed journals, closed databases of academic publishing, because of the copyright issues, but some of them can be found on the web. See for example here:
http://www.marquette.edu/maqom/dsd--Enochmetatron (talk) 02:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prominence

message: About the theology of religions, I noticed that Enoch was officially mentioned in a great amount of religions : Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Egyptian religion, Chinese religion, Hermetism, etc. Since there are possibly links between Enoch and Jesus, it would be a good idea for Christians to mention the role of Enoch when engaging in interfaith discussions. Additional work on the historical Enoch would also be appreciated. ADM (talk) 06:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Enoch and religions

message: The article conveys very few explanations, and lists too much details. Some notes:
# the headings are horribly long,
# each section should describe theories proponed and the occurence of any consensus,
# we don't need each and every participant, only the smart ones that had anything interesting to say, or the foolish ones that made fools of themselves, the policy of WP:INDISCRIMINATE applies here.
Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 19:58, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Badly written
Talk:Xuhui, Shanghai

message: "After the revolution, however, the large estates near Xujiahui were turned into factories. In the 1990s, the Shanghai municipal government developed the district as a commercial zone."
XuHui still has some of the most magnificent homes in Shanghai.  Any sources for the quoted section, or is this best characterized as OR? HedgeFundBob (talk) 02:11, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial zone?? 

message: The romanization for Xuhui is most likely not Siccawe. This sounds more like Xujiahui (note alternate spelling of that district: Zikawei). 114.111.166.7 (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese postal romanization 
Talk:Zhabei

message: Before the adoption of the pinyin system, the Zhabei district of Shanghai was routinely referred to as Chapei. A search of Google Books (using Chapei Shanghai) will quickly confirm this. (smjwalsh (talk) 22:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: One, "(Chapei)" explains "Zhabei", not "Shanghai". Two, it should be within the template. See latest change. HkCaGu (talk) 05:45, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I understood that Chapei did not explain Shanghai, just used Shanghai in search to make it easier to filter other references to "Chapei". Thanks for putting it in the template. It would be good to have a redirect from "Chapei" to "Zhabei". I'm an historian with research interests in pre Liberation Shanghai, and originally came to this article( after many references to "Chapei" in my reading.smjwalsh (talk) 07:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chapei
Talk:Jizhou, Tianjin

message: This place was known as Jizhou 薊州 during the Liao Dynasty
http://cces.snu.ac.kr/article/jces3_4biran.pdf
Rajmaan (talk) 03:07, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jizhou 
Talk:Shashi, Jingzhou

message: Shashi City was a prefecture-level city in Hubei province,People's Republic of China from 1949 to 1994.
Shashi District is a district within the main urban area of Jingzhou, Hubei province, People's Republic of China since 1994. 
So, the title named 'Shashi'is better.Beacause shashi city and shashi district are all about shashi.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 霜晨旻雪 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As I noted in my edit summary, the fact that there was a city named Shashi that became part of Jingzhou (and preserved in name as Shashi District) is relevant to the history section of this article, but it does not justify changing the name of the article or in rewriting the article about the city that no longer is. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Shashi city or Shashi district
Talk:Lori Robinson

message: The starting article's information was obtained from the link here. It is listed in the public domain per the statement number two from the link here. Icestorm815 (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Note

message: The article starts out with "Lori J. Robinson is a United States Air Force Brigadier General who was the Commander of the 552nd Air Control Wing, Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma. As commander, General Robinson is[contradiction] responsible for ... " In the second sentence, "commander" has no explanation other than the first sentence, so it means the same position. But in the first sentence she WAS the Commander, and in the second sentence, as commander she IS responsible. Was or is? The timeline at the end of the article says she was no longer the commander of the 552nd as of August 2008, and the reference also says "... was Commander, 552nd ...". Perhaps I should just change the second sentence to "was", but in that case shouldn't there be more emphasis on what she is now? Art LaPella (talk) 01:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Art LaPella (talk) 20:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction template 

message: Now commander of Pacific Air Forces, http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/518657/robinson-takes-command-of-pacaf.aspx  — MrDolomite • Talk 21:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014-10 Commander, PACAF 

message: Didn't she also do commercials on AFN for blood donations when she was a colonel? 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFN Commercials 

message: Pretty impressive to see that her Wikipedia entry was updated with assignment #28 (May 2016 - present, Commander, USNORTHCOM; Commander, NORAD) as quickly as the news broke which apparently was May 13. Her official bio page still hasn't been updated! 
--E-hadj (talk) 02:48, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia contributors FTW! 

message: What did Lori get the Bronze Stars for?  They don't have the Combat "V" so I assume they were for bureaucratic work (yes, you can get Bronze Stars for administering paperwork, sad but true).  50.202.81.2 (talk) 05:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bronze Stars 
Talk:Kartarpur, India

message: Unsure how to pursue editing this page, there's a lot of plain trivia on it. Someone more experienced should probably take a look and edit at it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.10.236.44 (talk) 08:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia. 

message: "Kartarpur is a town near the city of Jalandhar and is located in the Doaba region of the state." What state? 104.153.40.58 (talk) 21:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where?
Talk:List of people beatified by Pope John Paul II

message: I started the page with just 3 names: 1337 more names to go. Please add some if you can find the references. Eventually it will need a table structure to make it managable. But for now please just add some verified names (in alphabetical order by last name) with links. Thanks History2007 (talk) 02:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Quote: According to the Wikipedia page on Pope John Paul II he beatified 1,340 people, more than any previous pope.
We must use a separate source for any such statements, not just copying what some other WP article says (which in itself is subject to constant amendment).  --  JackofOz (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source CANNOT be Wikipedia
Talk:Dehua County

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.dehua.gov.cn/2011/07/24_1.shtml. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 20:18, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Huangxian

message: This page includes an entry Huang Xian, Zhejiang and says it is a "a city in Zhejiang Province, China". But I cannot find a city in Zhejiang named Huangxian. Can anyone provide a resource about this city or at least its Chinese character name? --Pengyanan (talk) 21:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Huangxian, China" from Falling Rain Genomics, Inc. places it at  and indicates that it is in Zhejiang Sheng.  Relatedly, there is also at page 196 of Zhongguo tu shu guan ming lu‎ an entry for P516 "Huangyan County Library Huangyan Xian, Zhejiang Province" the snippet shows the Chinese characters. --Bejnar (talk) 00:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your reply. The second source from Google Book Search is irrelevant to our discussion. It refers to Huangyan County (current Huangyan District, Taizhou, Zhejiang), not Huangxian. After a long time of search on Google Maps, I finally found where Huangxian is. It is not a city, but a village named 黄贤 in Qiucun Town (裘村镇), Fenghua City, Ningbo, Zhejiang. You may find the information about Qiucun Town at this page (in Chinese). Thanks. --Pengyanan (talk) 03:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Huang Xian, Zhejiang]]?
Talk:Humble Administrator's Garden

message: Do not move the gallery to the commons, it is consistent with every other garden article in terms of presenting one image to match each building description, it is not "too long" it is a result of the garden's scale.  By messing with this gallery you will ruin the symmetry of the garden articles.
Chinese gardens are designed around the buildings; buildings define the feel of each segment of garden, it is of paramount importance they be shown.
*okay dude I addressed and fixed the problem of the galleries, it is all in a nice collapsible table for scholars who may want/need more detailed information--Gurdjieff (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ATTN: Balthazarduju 

message: The All Blue Pavilion is listed in the Eastern & West Gardens - which is true? WestNab  —Preceding undated comment added 20:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  error 
Talk:Linda Ronstadt (album)

message: Hmmm.....still figuring out how to do this.  As stated above, in the wrong place apparently, contrary to the claims in the text of this article, NONE of the songs on this album "where" written by the Eagles.  Wish I knew how to fix this, and will figure it out one day when I have time, but could somebody at least delete that ridiculous sentence from the page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.222.23.251 (talk) 13:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eagles reference wrong 
Talk:Jinjiang Action Park

message: Geographical coordinates required!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.242.126 (talk) 23:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Laoling

message: "乐" is usually pronounced as lè or yuè, but in the case of "乐陵" it is incommonly pronounced as lào, which may be the only case. So the title of this article should be Laoling. See the url of the site of the government of the city: china-laoling.gov.cn. --Flsxx (talk) 11:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. I just moved the page to Laoling. --Unnecessary stuff (talk) 04:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leling or Laoling?
Talk:Pichilemu

message: I am working my way through the Good articles listed at Places; having a quick look to see if they still meet the Good article criteria. I have reached this article. After I've had a quick look, I'll leave a note here.
In general, initially I look to see if there are obvious issues: maintenance tags, unsourced sections, excessive media, etc, and if so, if this can be resolved quickly by myself. If it looks like there may be significant and/or several minor issues, I'll open a GAR to see the extent of the problems. If it looks like there are sufficient concerns to put the GA listing in jeopardy, and that significant work is needed to resolve the concerns, I will notify the main contributors to the article, and put the GAR on hold. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be keeping an eye here, and will do whatever that is necessary for Pichilemu to remain a GA. Thanks for your work SilkTork. Küñall (talk) 12:31, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Prose needs attention. There is an abundance of images, though this may be OK. The reason for selection of information is sometimes unclear; from the History section: "Aureliano Oyarzún, professor of pathology at University of Chile, investigated pre-Ceramic middens from Pichilemu and Cahuil. His book Crónicas de Pichilemu–Cáhuil (Chronicles of Pichilemu–Cáhuil) was published posthumously, in 1957" The National monuments section has a number of very short sub-sections. I think the layout issues are not serious, and can be fixed with a quick copy-edit, but the prose is a more serious issue, as that runs throughout the article, and it's also worth having a closer look at selection of information, so I'll open a GAR. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: GA check

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—2001:16A2:5D3F:8620:AC4A:E44C:8408:9C46 (talk) 04:25, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 14:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:EWI (musical instrument)

message: There seems to be a lack of an EVI page! Once again, I don't have the time to actually create an article, so would someone oblige?
http://r.ompo.us/ (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major problems

message: This article is missing a lot of details. When, for example, was the instrument invented? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.224.172.185 (talk) 17:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  When? 

message: I just finished listening to the June 22 episode of the Penn's Sunday School podcast, and in the interview, Richard Dawkins mentions that he plays the EWI (in the last 5 minutes or so). I'm not sure if he qualifies to go on the "Notable Players" list since he doesn't play one professionally, but I thought I'd mention it here and let someone else decide if he should be on the list. 
— BevansDesign (talk) 15:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Players addition? 

message: This page should be changed to “Steinerphone.” EWI is a brand name from Akai. Steinerphone was the original name of the instrument, and the page barely addresses other wind controllers. Other wind controllers should be mentioned under a separate section, as instruments inspired by the Steinerphone. 66.44.11.10 (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title
Talk:Swiss/Archive 1

message: While working on disambiging the links to this page, there were only a tiny fraction of the 1000+ links to the word 'Swiss' that were not intended for 'Switzerland'.  So, rather than having a 1000 links that intended for one page point to a disambig, the redirection seems appropriate....especially since there is already a 'Swiss (disambiguation)' page.
-Gwguffey (talk) 19:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would anyone looking for Switzerland type in Swiss? Swiss should redirect to Swiss people. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 09:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: mmm I'm really not convinced that Swiss people is the primary topic. "Swiss" is mostly used as an adjective and so should remain a redirect to Switzerland. mgeo talk 10:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If someone wanted to find out about Switzerland, they'd type in "Switzerland". If someone wanted to find out about something Swiss, it wouldn't be the country, it would be the Swiss or a non-existent language called Swiss or something else Swiss. I don't see why Swiss can't just stay a dab page. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 13:19, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Christopher Pearson (journalist)

message: Hi . Following on from our discussion on my talk page... I see that you have made some additions to the article without sourcing them. When I worked on it, it was as a diversion from something else (as my edits often are!) and I made no attempt to make the article as complete as possible, so I am sure that there are many untapped sources to use - for instance he has an entry on Austlit here for backup to the basic info already there, and a few extra details. I have found two sources for his Patrick White thesis (here and here), if you would like to add them, but a quick Google returned nothing about Tony Abbott being a pallbearer. Do please expand the article as much as you like, but ensure that the details are cited. Feel free to ask questions, and also use the links on the welcome panel on your talk page for further guidance. I will return to this when I finish my current round of work, but just ping me here if you have any questions about this one. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , Well I haven't managed to get back to this either, as there's always a long list of things to do, that is perpetually having new things added... Sorry to hear that you've been in hospital. I'm afraid I don't. I might have got to see that myself, only a case of Covid got in the way of my festival-going! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced additions
Talk:Eastern Housing Limited

message: It is unclear, but the company appears to be a subsidiary of Islam Group, which does not have an article here yet.  The 'mid' importance comes from this being a national concern in Bangladesh and having secured 40% of the national residential housing market by 2008. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance with respect to WP Companies
Talk:Iyatayet site

message: The term "Cape Denbigh flint complex" as used by Giddings refers specifically to the Arctic Small Tool tradition (ASTt) component (the earliest component) at the Iyatayet site, NOT to the later Norton component.--Death Bredon (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cape Denbigh flint complex 
Talk:Dawn Rochelle Warner

message: Please see references:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0743471/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0743616/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0905861/
Mali07 (talk) 03:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reason I tagged the article for deletion is that Dawn Warner Ramos was in Walker, not Dawn Rochelle Warner, (my summary clearly indicated this, you can still see this in the article history)  I didn't see anything indicating that they were the same person in the article or in the links you provided.  Have to assume they are not the same person since that is the actual TITLE of the article and the information doesn't match up.  Pharmboy (talk) 03:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am working on an essay at User_talk:Pharmboy/PDT that is in NO way an official document of Wikipedia.  It is a very rough draft, but you may find the info useful.  Pharmboy (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for delete

message: I found one weak cite that indicates the two names are the same person.  It was a pdf in spanish (thank you translate.google.com).  I removed tag.  The article still needs citations, but it is out of the woods, in my opinion.  Pharmboy (talk) 14:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: found citation
Talk:National Rose Garden

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.nationalcapital.gov.au/index.php/attractions-managed-by-the-nca/old-parliament-house-gardens?showall=1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 08:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Elizabeth Oehlkers Wright

message: The authors which were translated by Mrs. Wright (Zafer Senocak, Zehra Cirak and Ernst Peter Fischer) have their articles in the German WP without any complaints and thus they are relevant. Mrs. Wright herself is relevant - her translations do not come out at any dubious Vanity-publishers. I will remove that tag. --Ullipurwin (talk) 03:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody said those authors were not notable (perhaps they are, perhaps not, I have no idea), but whatever may be the case, that does not mean that their translator automatically gets notable, too. I'll take this to AfD so that we can get an idea how the community thinks about this. --Crusio (talk) 10:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reasons for removing the prod-tag
Talk:Mackenzie High School (Michigan)

message: The Jan 03 version of the article contains excessive detail and trivia (especially lists) and attributions not supported by citations (eg the Tom Skerritt stuff). It is also written in a style which is more appropriate to a reminiscence project or memorial rather than for an encyclopedia article. Templates have been added: author(s) of much of the current content are invited to edit it according to WP:MoS. Plutonium27 (talk) 14:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-Up Needed 