lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mighty Agrippa, Roman God of the Aqueduct

message: I'm not familiar with the comic books, only the animated series. I added a line about Agrippa being known as "god of the Aqueduct" in the cartoon, but now that I'm looking around, I don't see any evidence that "Viaduct" is correct in either incarnation. Does anyone have any support for "Viaduct", or should the article be renamed? -- Fru1tbat 22:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is Aqueduct in both the comics and the animated series.  I have confirmed that both in the Giant Circus and in Agrippa's first appearance in the Tick #11. Ballabosh 00:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character name
Talk:Barbara O'Brien

message: I've completed a first-pass copyedit, attempting to reorganize the information that was there in a more standard BLP format, clean up and add some sources, add a bit of info about her recent election to the school board, and tag a few items for further improvement, but which ought to stay for now per WP:PRESERVE.  Much more work could be done, but I believe it is no longer a stub article.  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 02:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit 
Talk:WNBA on ESPN

message: To explain rationale behind changing name from WNBA Tuesday to The WNBA on ESPN2: WNBA Tuesday and The WNBA on ESPN2 are the same. The only regular season WNBA broadcasts are on WNBA Tuesday. Changing the name allows the article to encompass both the regular season (WNBA Tuesday) and the playoffs. Paulsen 22:35, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lithium (forums)

message: Greatly expanded this page, but I'm in need of users from other Lithium-based boards to help with it.  I only post on the Adult Swim board, so that's why several examples are from there.  I signed up to 1up.com just to compare differences.  Anyone who frequents the Nintendo boards or perhaps Dell.com and knows differences, or other Lithium capablilities, please add.
Supersnake1234 22:35, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:John Hardin High School

message: This page had some serious POV issues. It was obviously written by some school administrator with no respect for neutral POV. I will work on correcting and expanding this article.
This page needs some serious work.  I am a John Hardin Alumni and this page doesn't show much about what the school has to offer.  Someone, please take a hint from Central and North Hardin High Schools.
Mgrunnet (talk) 20:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ptolemy's Gate

message: Please don't have conversations on this talk page -- Sam 1123 18:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please don't

message: is JS going to write another killer book? I loved this series and i want to know if he's going to write more  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.71.219.140 (talk) 07:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: When

message: The entire "Synopsis" section looks like an excerpt from a book review or the publisher's own summary that appears on the book jacket. Either way, it has no place in the article. I would delete it myself, but I would prefer to have comments. C. M. Harris Talk to me 01:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis section 

message: The summary states the book is American. Where does this information come from since rthe author was born, educated and lives in England?Rufty 16:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  American? 

message: Edit by user 185.51.254.253 changes setting dates, with no reference, to info that contradicts wiki page on the second book in this trilogy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golem%27s_Eye#Setting . This IP has quite a few reverted edits for vandalism, but obviously I can't assume that this is too. Is there any online reference available for this, or can a non-anonymous user stake their reputation on a correct date? In the interest of transparency I have recently edited the other article I reference, but I only re-worded it for clarity. Dichohecho (talk) 12:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setting
Talk:Barbu Catargiu

message: " The killing was the only political assassination of the century,[4] " - PARDON ME??? Not quite.  Abraham Lincoln ring a bell?  Anyway, this is referenced to a now non-existant website.  Since it was listed as the Catargiu Family Tree, I'm not sure how it would support such a statement anyhow.  So it goes. HammerFilmFan (talk) 18:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: Assassination section
Talk:Baron Greville

message: Some one removed my reinsertion of 5th and 6th barons as part of the title.  This appears to be correct.  The earlier claimant was the son of a niece, apparently through a relationship that must be incestuous.  If so, this would be an illegitimate descent, which cannot give rise to a valid claim to a peerage.  NB please log in before editing: this helps the rest of us editors.  Peterkingiron (talk) 12:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claimants
Talk:Joseph W. Byrns Jr.

message: Comes from the NYT Proquest database. The article is from October 12th and it is titled "BYRNS FACES FIGHT FOR SEAT IN HOUSE". That's just in case you all wanted to know. --RobbieFal 22:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defeat Info 

message: Who are we to say if this is true?  Maybe it was just longer than his first one.  In absence of a reference quoting either him or Mrs. Byrns or both stating how happy they are, is this not best left out?  Also, the comment about how the first wife never quit using Byrns' name likewise needs to be referenced as it smacks of being personal knowledge/original research.  2600:1004:B11C:F56F:7424:958C:26AA:14BB (talk) 03:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Happy marriage"?
Talk:Baron MacAndrew

message: I removed the WKBio template as the article is about a title in the Peerage of the United Kingdom, not any of those who hold the title, for example Charles MacAndrew, 1st Baron MacAndrew. gaidheal1 (talk♫contribs) 16:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: behind a paywall. Haven't found confirmation elsewhere that doesn't point to the same link as sole evidence. Perhaps a small screenshot of the obituary , though that's not definitive evidence, but better on completely relying on claim that it's actually there? ELSchissel (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've entered a notice in their talk section with a request that someone who, unlike me, can access the paywalled death notice, check it first; I will not make a change when there is only one piece of (independent) evidence and that piece invisible to me. ELSchissel (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

text: (btw: :de:Christopher_MacAndrew,_3._Baron_MacAndrew is the de page in question.) ELSchissel (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death notice of 3rd Baron
Talk:Richard G. Wilkinson

message: University of Nottingham School of Community Health Sciences removed as it no longer mentions Prof Wilkinson. Vernon White . . . Talk  21:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Uninformative link

message: Wilkinson appears to have spent some time at the Trafford Centre for Medical Research, University of Sussex, Brighton. Vernon White . . . Talk  21:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: University of Sussex

message: The article states that R. W. had shown in his publications xy to be the case. The article on his apparently best-known book, The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, however indicates that there exists a significant controversy in academic circles about the thesis/theses put foreward by him. / Social sciences is not my subject and anyway it is not my business to judge who may be right to what extent for which reasons in that dispute, just it looks that the wording in the article here is inadaequate and misleading, do you not think so? 
Regards, -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 17:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''...has shown...'' - has he indeed?! 

message: The article tells us that his masters thesis dates from 1976, his first book from an independent publisher in London, however, dating from 1973. That seems quite unusual, does it not? -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 17:30, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication dates 

message: As far as I know one must not link from the article directly to outside internet sources, as (an) author/s has/have done here! -- 147.142.186.54 (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No links to outside sources! 

message: Why is that?
--Id447 (talk) 04:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply to 147.142.186.54
Talk:Barry Curtis (mayor)

message: Somebody has added the below underneath the article:
MBE Sidney Ensor (1893-1980) was the Mayor of Thames, New Zealand for 28 years from 1931 to 1959 and a member of the council for 54 years. For this service he received a knighthood from Queen Elizabeth and Ensor Place in Thames was named after him and Margaret Place was named after his wife. Thus, I believe, Sir Sidney Ensor holds the record of New Zealand's longest serving Mayor. 
I have thus rewritten the lead to remove the ambiguity that was caused by the Manukau CC press release quoted via Scoop. Souds like Sidney Ensor would deserve his own article, or at least get a mention in the Thames article. Schwede66 15:45, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest serving mayor 
Talk:Richie Farmer

message: Should the article include the name of Farmer's mistress? Acdixon (talk · contribs) 13:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming there was no ambiguity in the report, I would include it, but with in-text attribution to the Herald-Leader. Dwpaul Talk    14:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP question 

message: It's remarkable to me, especially in the cram-in-the-pix Wikipedia, how few pictures there are in this article—and none at all of the article's subject (his team's coach?), despite his being a star athlete and statewide politician.  Surely there are pictures of him out there, all these years later. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I would love to have added a picture of Farmer, and I'm sure there are some available made by state government entities, but I know those are not automatically PD, as they are with US federal entities. I did some cursory searches way back when, but something more may have come to light in the interim. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 17:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos?
Category talk:Puzzle computer and video games

message: As this category was beginning to look rather bloated, I made a new subcategory; :Category:Falling block puzzle games, as it is a well-defined subgenre and easiest to distinguish from the others ('puzzle-action games' as already noted in the main text) Please help to diffuse as necessary! Marasmusine 22:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rick Kelly

message: This private life stuff is getting out of hand - cite or delete methinks. --Falcadore (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Private life

message: I have added an Activism section due to Kelly's support of the Oscar's Law campaign (the section may require renaming), as this is a significant campaign worth adding.--Soulparadox (talk) 15:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a singnificant addition if there is significant coverage of Kelly in relation to the subject. While it may be an important subject, Kelly's support of it is trivial. Should probably be removed unless there is a reliable source that Kelly has active support of the subject. --Falcadore (talk) 07:16, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I will add further citations; part of my reasoning is to reflect the fact that Kelly is involved with a charitable cause beyond just his racing. It seems reasonable to presume that such activity by people like Kelly is undertaken due to a pride underpinning their decision to become involved. I also think it is important that figures like Kelly are perceived and understood as multi-dimensional people who are not just "celebrities". I am aware that original research is disallowed on Wikipedia, for good reason, but if both Kelly and his management were asked about this matter, I would be incredibly surprised if a decision is made to omit such information. Of course, I do not expect to expand this section beyond what currently exists, but I certainly think that it is worth mentioning (in the same way that other celebrities have been recognized for their charity work). Furthermore, I do not own a dog or support the campaign in any way.--Soulparadox (talk) 07:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also changed the section title so that it is more accurate.--Soulparadox (talk) 07:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section
Talk:Bart Staes

message: Can somebody find a suiting reference for the University of Ghent as the supposed alma mater? Bart Staes has Belgian "regentaat" degree which is more commonly offered at a non-universitary Belgian college. It is a teaching degree for middle school. --Keffertje08 (talk) 22:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Alma mater
Talk:Accepted Frewen

message: Must one die, to become the Archbishop of York?  Any way to source his death year?  Ratagonia 22:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Death?

message: Was "Accepted" his real name? - Yorkshirian (talk) 14:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? 80.193.130.5 (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Bartolomé Martínez

message: This source, published by the Nicaraguan Ministry of Education, lists Martínez' maternal surname as González, whereas this source (an unofficial genealogy site) lists his maternal surname as Hernández. I'm rather more inclined to believe the official site. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maternal surname confusion
Talk:Rob MacLean

message: His primary name page should be Rob Maclean, with the lowercase L, as shown on his official twitter.  I tried moving it, but it didn't work as there is already a redirect page for him there.EnglishDez (talk) 22:52, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rob Maclean primary name 

message: Who keeps removing the edits about him commentating for Radio Scotland? A source was provided () and I'd say it's relevant to the article. Well, it's relevant if his other sources of work are... Marks87 (talk) 14:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies; I never noticed the edit was retained, but altered slightly. Marks87 (talk) 14:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentating for Radio Scotland
Talk:Batthyány

message: This page is in the category Beatified People. I hope someone can indicate which member(s) of the family were beatified in the article. John Carter 22:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course László Batthyány-Strattmann was beatified. --Koppany 11:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As there is a separate article for Laszlo, is it necessary to list his entire clan in the saints category?Mannanan51 (talk) 03:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Beatified people
Talk:Rob Stefaniuk

message: This guy is not notable enough to have a page at all, and look at the opening intro "has numerous credits as an actor and series regular". Right - apparently too numerous to actually mention. No one could recognize this guys name or face, even in Canada. Pretty shameless self promotion here.
204.50.172.132 (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This article definitely does need significant improvement, but the guy actually does pass our notability standards — which have nothing to do with "fame" as such, so how many people would or wouldn't recognize his name or face is irrelevant. Notability begins and ends at whether a person has enough reliable source coverage about them to verify something that passes a notability standard — and this guy does have coverage: the secret being that he has it more as a film director (Phil the Alien, Suck, etc.) than as an actor. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Obviously written by Rob Stefaniuk
Talk:Beant Singh (politician)

message: The title, currently Beant Singh (chief minister) should correctly be Beant Singh (Chief Minister). Chief Minister is a title and not a description and should be capitalised in English. The title was originally correct and then changed to lower case in 2007. Imc (talk) 20:12, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 
Talk:Robert Acquafresca

message: Acquafresca bought-back fee from Cagliari should be €6 million, made his contract value in June 2008 was €6.1 million (€6M + €0.1M retained half). Assuming 3-year contract, his value in June 2009 should be €4.066 million [€6.1 times 2 over 3], matching the  accounts and report of Internazionale in 2008–09 season. However i did not had the accounts and report of Cagliari to verify. Matthew_hk tc 07:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Acquafresca bought-back fee
Talk:Robert Broughton (activist)

message: You can't remove comments from a talk page.  I am reproposing the article for deletion and reporting you to an editor.  Alexwoods 14:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to the history of this page for comments previously deleted by Prescottbush.  Alexwoods 15:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I restored the page immediately after accidentally deleting it, my usenet comments are irrelevant to the merits of this article, and my employment has never had anything to do with tobacco.  I am not aware that my employer does any work for any tobacco company.  I did, however, first become aware of the topic of this bio, and the actual person hiding behing the username, due to his harassment of a usenet group that discusses smoking.  I was surprised that he had a Wikipedia page, but that surprise went away when I realized that he has written it himself.  Prescottbush has repeatedly violated Wikipedia policy in reposting a deleted article, posting a vanity page, sockpuppetry, and deleting other user's comments and proposals without justification.  At the very least, he needs to explain his behavior.  Alexwoods 15:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry, don't understand the last comment.  If you do an AfD, the nomination would (or should) show up as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Broughton (second nomination); plenty of space there.   John Broughton  |  Talk 18:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it, I think there may have been some confusion between WP:PROD and WP:AFD -- the result was the old AFD being posted at WP:AFD.  I made the second nomination page, and removed the other. Dina 00:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Dina.  That was the problem.  Alexwoods 03:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

text: If all of the arrogant people were removed from Wikipedia, it would be much smaller. Prescottbush 06:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fox Chapel Area School District

message: Good Lord, this article is borderline fellatio.  It is nothing but uncited praise and reads like an advertisement.  There are even sections written in First Person!  This article needs some serious work.  "Country" Bushrod Washington 20:31, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow!!! 

message: Okay . . . I know you guys like your school.  But you cannot have the article as it was; it came across as nothing more than an advertisement, and more importantly, it was plagiarized word-for-word off of the school's website (given the claims of supposed prestige, I'd think you guys would know about plagiarism, not to mention spelling . . . ).  Now, I think the revision as I've left it is fair, noting its recognition, and one of its more recent awards, but keeping the gratuitous claims of prestige to a minimum.  If you guys want to add more, please provide a source, and make sure you don't plagiarize.  "Country" Bushrod Washington 00:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: That's Better
Talk:Robert Durst

message: The current lead is fairly short, just listing the dates of the murders and subsequent trials. Considering the extraordinary circumstances regarding the HBO documentary, arrest and trial, and the bathroom soundbite, its seems like they should be included in the lead section to better summarize that sequence of events. jonas (talk) 02:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. 2601:401:100:FBD:4070:4B5C:BF40:7363 (talk) 00:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include Documentary and 2015 trial in lead? 

message: The  ABC news program 20/20 aired a 2 hour episode about Durst on March 18, 2022. The Devil You Know, Season 44, Episode 18, "Fugitive multimillionaire Robert Durst and shocking trial that led to a murder conviction." AdderUser (talk) 04:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  20/20 Episode on Durst 

message: After the Black death, and before he was arrested for the Berman murder, Durst was acquitted of murder but pleaded guilty to two counts of bail jumping and one count of evidence tampering. He served time and was paroled, and was arrested and returned to jail for parole violations. He obviously faced legal issues in that time period, as opposed to the lead section statement "Durst did not face further legal action until his participation in the 2015 documentary miniseries The Jinx led to him being charged with Berman's murder."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:401:100:fbd:9d35:ebaa:d23:16dd (talk) 03:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence has been revised:  The legal action pertaining to his parole violations is frankly too trivial to include in the lead sentence, which by design is concise and states only the most significant events in a biographical article's subject's history. Note that the article is not currently protected and you could just as easily as I have made this change. General Ization Talk   03:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

text: See above. The lead sentence cannot and should not itemize all of the legal actions and events in which Durst was a figure.  Note the phrase significant further legal action.  His 2014 conviction for criminal mischief, the restraining orders and trespassing charge and the various civil actions against him are insignificant in light of his other known criminal activities and convictions. Please see MOS:LEAD. And please sign your edits on any Talk page. General Ization Talk   03:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Also please note that it is generally not necessary or helpful to copy content from the article to the Talk page, and unnecessarily bloats the section with content that can be easily reviewed (with one click) in the article itself. General Ization Talk   03:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misinformation in lead section, better wording should be used.
Talk:Ben W. Hooper

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 20:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the content, and selectively removed or substantially reworded the edits by the IP mentioned in the investigation. BrineStans (talk) 21:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem