Talk:X-Raided

message: Per WP:BLP, controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately. This applies to the article and the talk page. I have edited both accordingly.
Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:BLP 

message: Please spell out notability here and/or make it clear in the article. Per WP:MUSIC there are a dozen clear cut cases, which are not eveident here:
1) Was the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent ... and reliable
2) Had a charted hit on any national music chart
3) Had a record certified gold or higher
4) Has non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour
5) Had two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels
6) (applies only to groups) 
7) Is the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city 
8) Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury or Grammis award 
9) Has won or placed in a major music competition. 
10) Has performed music for a work of media that is notable...(But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to ... redirect) 
11) Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network. 
12) Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network. 
Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your tone is really unnecessary and not at all helpful. Natalie (talk) 15:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop bothering me. I want to prove he is notable enough. --Flesh-n-Bone 15:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you consider this bothering, perhaps you should reconsider how you participate in this project. I'm not saying you can't prove that this person is notable. I'm saying that your tone and word choice are unnecessary and unhelpful, which they are. They don't prove this person's notability in any way, nor do they help you participate in a collaborative project. You are also violating a policy by personally attacking another editor. If you can't cut the attacks and rudeness, then we have a problem. Natalie (talk) 15:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nowhere saying curse words are forbidden to be used. "It's fucking good" what'd you find with it? All that "tone" bull should be forgotten. --Flesh-n-Bone 18:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: She's probably referring to the "Stop being so ignorant" which certainly came across as rude to me as well. Responding with "Stop bothering me" wasn't likely to ease concerns. Whether or not "tone" should be forgotten is a moot point. Wikipedia demands that we stay civil or get gone. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty much right, Mdsummermsw. Swearing may not be forbidden, but combined with calling someone ignorant and then responding to my statement with "stop bothering me" doesn't paint a nice picture. May I suggest that you check you attitude before you end up blocked. Natalie (talk) 19:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I was just annoyed, so im' sorry. --Flesh-n-Bone 11:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: "He is the half-brother to rappers, Brotha Lynch Hung and Sicx"
That is most likely not true since on his site, i e bloc star he says "we aren't related by DNA". Check "authentic article by X-Raided". (SebastianGS (talk) 13:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Related to Lynch and Sicx?

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://csus-dspace.calstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10211.9/1140/Hybrid%20Gangs%20and%20the%20Hyphy%20Movement-%20Crossing%20the%20Color%20Line%20in%20Sacramento%20County2.pdf?sequence=1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed