lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cornelius Boza-Edwards

message: During his boxing career he was almost always, as I recall, referred to by his full name "Cornelius Boza-Edwards". The only source on this page lists him as Cornelius Boza-Edwards, as does cyberboxingzone.com, imasportsphile.com, Facebook. All include the hyphenated version as well so that should be the name of this article.
Please move page to Cornelius Boza-Edwards, which is currently a redirect. --DB1729 (talk) 23:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: --DB1729 (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:British Rail Class 325

message: If there are 16 units, how can they be numbered 325 001 to 017? Where is the 17th? Coccodrillo (talk) 12:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Check your maths :-) 86.132.193.87 (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

message: has repeatedly edited this article to change its family from British Rail Mark 3 to Networker without either citation, changing the rest of the article text, or indeed any explanation.  Along with that, they have also repeatedly changed Template:Mark 3-derived and Template:Networker to suit their version of reality, again without citation, comment or anything else to justify these edits.
I notice that British Rail Mark 3 also omits Class 325, but not through any recent changes. I don't want to fix this myself, as I'm not sure I can see the full facts either way, since there is no citation to show its ancestry from the British Rail Class 319. Tim PF (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's certainly got a Networker cab, not a class 319 cab, but of course the rest of the bodywork might be based upon the mark 3 design. The usual giveaway is the corrugated roof (see this photo of a class 317, the earliest of the Mk. 3 derived EMUs; or this photo of a class 319), whereas Networker multiple-units have a smooth roof (see this photo of a class 365). --Redrose64 (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry 

message: Do we really need these poorly drawn diagrams?  We have plenty of photographs.  The author gets seriously offended when they are removed, but seems unable to justify their inclusion:
Tony May (talk) 13:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of low quality fan artwork 

message: I have made an edit on the British Rail Class 325, so please don't revert my edit! Thanks :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Northernrailwaysfan (talk • contribs) 09:37, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If you don't want your edit reverting, you need to cite a reference to a published reliable source. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  /*Class 325 EMU*/
Talk:British Rail Class 332

message: Ok going to go into a bit of detail here.
Rail magazine issue 925 February 24 2021 says that 3 cars of a 332 that are Siemens‘s site in goole are to be used as temporary classrooms so that’s why I put 3 cars as preserved as for now there are 3 cars from a 332 preserved.
Rail magazine issue 925 February 24 2021 does not say how long the 3 cars will be kept by Siemens or what will happen to those 3 sets once Siemens no longer needs them.
Rail Rail magazine issue 925 February 24 2021 does mention in a photo caption bellow the article that one of the cars is Driving motor standard (DMS) 78400 from 332001. It does not say which set the other 2 cars are from or what cars those are.
Just thought I’d leave this here so editors can know what Rail magazine issue 925 February 24 2021 says about the 3 persevered cars. Maurice Oly (talk) 02:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sets preserved
Talk:British Rail Class 333

message: I feel that now its now time to say that I think that we need some photos of the trains in their new liveries and with the new refurbished interiors since theres no longer any operational 333s in the old Northern livery. Pepper Gaming (talk) 17:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Livery 

message: So I was watching a youtube video on the 333s just showing the in action and I saw something interesting , one of the 333s in the video had a name sticker on it couldn’t make out the unit number.
Does anybody have any news sources covering any 333s getting a name sticker? The video can’t be used as proof here so I’m not posting it
Named sticker can be seen in the video, to read Alderman J Arthur goodman first lord mayor of Bradford in case that helps anybody.
I’ll keep searching for a news article  now but if any other editors can help with this that would be great. Maurice Oly (talk) 19:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi There, Two 333's used to have names (333007 and 333011) but the name stickers got removed when they went for refurbishment. Hope This Helps Pepper Gaming (talk) 01:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named unit? 

message: In my edit summary to this page in my last edit I used the year 2000, I ment 2001 my bad. Maurice Oly (talk) 03:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: The Class 333s true built date was 1999-2001 2A01:4B00:854C:2A00:DF3:A71B:AC35:B0D6 (talk) 11:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reference to a reliable source? - David Biddulph (talk) 11:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 333
Talk:Junior Lessard

message: :Removed and corrected a few things.  He was ineligible for the draft, as he was North American and too old, so he was only available as a free agent to the NHL.  Leafschik1967 00:53, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cornell Capa

message: Consider replacing "Life and Works" with multiple sections to accommodate a larger amount of information.  This would  meet the Wikipedia guidelines requiring "a system of heirarchical section headings." 
     i.  Life - bio type info, birth, death, family, etc.
     ii. Career - chronological explanation of his career as a photographer/photojournalist
     iii. Notable Works (would be a great place to add some photos)
     iv.  Awards recieved
     v.  Contributions - ICP, Awards given in his honor, maybe some quotes from some notable artists and photojournalists about the           influence he has had on their work.
Jeffboone (talk) 01:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add structure 

message: Consider putting some of his more notable works and explaining their importance Ebw7 (talk) 03:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice idea.--150.212.68.198 (talk) 14:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Works
Talk:British Rail Class 350

message: needs one image, not two. 86.143.215.78 (talk) 12:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reinserted the removed image into the article, but placed it into a gallery instead. Raywil (talk) 18:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I also think the previous picture looks better, but I can't quite put my finger on why I think that. Raywil (talk) 18:34, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: the Infobox

message: All Class 350/4 had been delivered by the end of March 2014 Altfish (talk) 17:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Class 350/4

message: www.abrail.co.uk is a hobbyist/enthusiast website. See WP:USERGENERATED. It is not a reliable site for citing the names of units. --109.153.214.109 (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A more productive action is to make an effort to find a reliable source or if not request a cite be added rather than deleting outright. NevHil43 (talk) 06:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable sources 

message: The class 323 was never replaced by the class 350, it was planned for the Northern Rail class 323 fleet to go to London Midland in 2009 but that never happened.
And while yes London Midland did order class 350/2s instead of getting more class 323s London Midland retained their entire fleet of class 323s and so did Northern Rail so the class 350 did not replace the class 323 hence why I removed the class 323 from the replaced list. Maurice Oly (talk) 13:01, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 323 

message: The Class 350/1 2004-05 the class  350/2 build date 2008-09 the class 350/3 build date 2012-13 the Class 350/4s build date 2014-15 2A01:4B00:854C:2A00:DF3:A71B:AC35:B0D6 (talk) 11:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Great to know. Please update the article with supporting references. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Build date 

message: Hi all, obviously the current image isn't bad or especially outdated, but with the majority of the 350s having receieved the LNR livery - not the plain/ex-LM one - would a new image be suitable; and if so what are people's thoughts on this? 
Don't want to start edit wars hence why posting here :D Vanmanyo (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a very dark image - can it be brightened? Danners430 (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

text: The current image is significantly higher quality and shows more of the train as well. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 17:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New infobox image 

message: I found a nameplate sorta thing on 350 250, if you want me to, i'll send a picture. But the name in question is "2011 Golden Spanner" and i haven't seen this on any other Class 350/2 before. Charjabugz (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That’s not a name, it’s an “award” given to the most reliable unit. LNER did it with their HSTs. Danners430 (talk) 09:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah okay, thank you for telling me Charjabugz (talk) 10:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible new name on 350 250
Talk:Justin Duchscherer

message: Anyone who has been to an A's game, especially if they sit in the left-field bleachers, knows that the main drummer always wears a shirt that says "Duke" - referring to the Justin Duchscherer.  Is this a good thing to put in the "trivia" section or is it TOTALLY and COMPLETELY irrelevent?  serlmano 05:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter.  ;-)  Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drummers
Talk:British Rail Class 357

message: Can someone explain why this unit has been sent to the Czech Republic? Are they considering buying Electrostars, is work being done on it there, or something else? David Arthur 18:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  357028 

message: is it me, or do these look like British Rail Class 170's? ACBest 19:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s not a coincidence: the 168, 170, 357, 375, 376, 377, and the upcoming 378 all form one family of trains from Bombardier. The 357, in particular, uses the same body shell as the 170 and later 168s. David Arthur 23:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  class 170 

message: Internet forums such as http://www.consumerdeals.co.uk/ are not reliable sources and need to be replaced. MRSC (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources

message: This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avicennasis (talk • contribs) 18:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible change to the title of this article

message: It's important to check that these are the people that are linked to.  All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Train names

message: The class 357/0s entered service 1999-01 The 357/2s 2001-02 and did you know some class 357/2s have been converted as 357/3s 2A01:4B00:854C:2A00:DF3:A71B:AC35:B0D6 (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As has been mentioned to you on other pages, references to reliable sources are needed.- David Biddulph (talk) 12:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Build date
Talk:K Callan

message: At first glance, it looks like this article's always put the subject's birthdate in 1942. IMDB and the New York Times article we cite both put it in 1936.
Other sources that Google turned up put it in 1942, but they all looked like the types of sites that would have gotten their information from us. Since our only reference for this article puts her DOB in 1936, I'm going to change the article; if somebody's got a quality source that contradicts, feel free to change it back and cite. --Moralis (talk) 02:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate
Talk:K. C. Jones

message: Certainly "K.C." wasn't his real name. Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 00:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See this ESPN article about his death. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 00:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Name
Talk:XHMTCH-TDT

message: Does this station still exist? There is no record of it in FCC or COFETEL, there is K26KJ on channel 26 analog and KINT Univision on VC 26.1. How did K40FW get a construction permit on channel 26? —AMAPO (talk) 19:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: K40FW changed callsign and channel number K26KJ channel 26 [FCC Source] —AMAPO (talk) 19:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off-air or changed callsign? 

message: This makes no sense. Why is this article for both, an American station K26KJ-D on the air and a Mexican station that is yet to start regular transmissions? Sure, both stations are owned by the same corporation and the programmming will be too similar, but is not the same station and XHMTCH-TDT will start its history from scratch this year, not have it in common with K26KJ-D.--MexTDT (talk) 07:39, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same article for two different stations in different countries?
Talk:Correll Buckhalter

message: Stat box needs updating to include 2007.--Rollonover (talk) 06:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats outdated
Talk:British Rail Class 365

message: Assuming I'm not completely misunderstanding the terminology (which is always possible - I don't see it defined anywhere) the formation shows only first class in one carriage - I thought the FCC units had first class accommodation at both ends? Roy Badami (talk) 23:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation 

message: What does DMCO, TOSL and PTOSL mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.244.153.18 (talk) 08:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's something like Driving Motor Composite Open, Trailer Standard Open Lavatory, Pantograph Trailer Standard Open Lavatory. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology
Talk:Correlli Barnett

message: What is the origin of his first name?  Badagnani 07:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: His statements on the Iraq War should be added.  Badagnani 07:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now a hopelessly unbalanced article with far too much information about his views on modern events and very little on what he is really notable for, his work as a historian. Unfortunately, I don't know enough to rebalance it. Dabbler (talk) 02:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Statements on the Iraq War

message: Corelli Barnett is almost masterful in his correct evaluation of "Us and Them" and how it has tainted British society for a century.
He missed the point about the use of the British army though. Under the various military acts of Parliament beginning with Lloyd George in 1917 (gazing over his shoulder at the Russian Revolution and French Army mutiny) , legally the British Army is only required to protect a government from its own citizens. This is a civil war and it is under no obligation to fight overseas.
In  the meantime armies are expensive and have to be kept busy doing something. The Roman Army built roads between campaigns.
To give the military a much experience in as realistic a situation as possible, it is deployed overseas in "trouble spots" to keep it busy rather than idle in UK barracks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.93.199.154 (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This article portrays the rambling thoughts of a confused bigot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4B00:881D:3700:A913:8894:F049:F2CA (talk) 23:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  correct and misses the point. 

message: This section contains what appears to be WP:OR cited to Barnett; many paragraphs are uncited or with citation needed tags. The quotes to Barnett are quite extensive. Any feedback? K.e.coffman (talk) 22:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Add: in these two sources, Barnett's views are presented as right-wing: Attlee: A Life in Politics and From Dynasties to Dotcoms. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics section
Talk:Corrie Sanders

message: Born in 1965 or 1966. The article uses both years. --41.151.59.201 (talk) 10:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be 1966... REFERENCE  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.222.193.214 (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 

message: His last fight was in 2008 and he was fighting frequently prior to this. Then there's a gap until 2012 when he dies. Did he retire after his last fight? This guy's record is really good and it seems like he could have keep going. Jason Quinn (talk) 01:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the gap after last fight and death? Retirement? 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Floyd says "Floyd was murdered by Derek Chauvin, a white Minneapolis police officer". Why doesn't this article say anything about a specific characteristic of the 3 men that killed Corrie Sanders?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.26.163.17 (talk) 20:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Wikipedia so woke? 

message: , I've removed the GA nomination, since per the GA instructions nominators must check with significant contributors to the article before nominating.  You can see who the significant contributors are by viewing the history, here, and clicking on the "Page statistics" link.  As I see you're fairly new to Wikipedia, I'll ping the other active main contributor, ; if they don't reply or have no objections you can go ahead and renominate. Any questions, let me know. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 01:35, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't that page confirm I am the 2nd or 3rd (depending on statistic) most significant contributor to the article? --Martscont (talk) 17:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does; the instructions require that all significant contributors be consulted.  Mac Dreamstate is still active, so they should be asked.  If they don't respond, that's fine -- go ahead and renominate if you want. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 18:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no input to add. I only maintained the record table, succession box and lead section a long time ago. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed GA nomination
Talk:Minotaur-class cruiser (1943)

message: The Tiger class were never Guided Missile Cruisers, they were firstly Light Cruisers then after modernisation Helicopter Cruisers.
If there are no objections I'll modify the text after a few days220.110.178.109 (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guided Missile Cruisers?
Talk:Corry Brokken

message: At the start of the article, Corry Brokken's date of death is given as May 31, 2016. However at the end of the "Biography" section it is given as May 30, 2016. Does anyone know the correct date? 
(I don't speak Dutch, so I can't simply check Dutch newspapers or Wikipedia!)
Rosertnom (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death
Talk:Cory Arcangel

message: that arcangel is the good one  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.0.24.6 (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Catholic schools in the United Kingdom

message: Since the Roman Catholic church "supports" evolution as a science (see Evolution and the Roman Catholic Church), are there any catholic schools anywhere (US or UK) that teach creationism?  j-beda 18:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creationism teaching

message: The article says:
many shared campuses have suffered large scale fights or other disruptions on opening
I don't think this is true. The first one in Dalkeith did suffer some playground fights, but these were not attributed to religious tensions. I'm not aware of any other fights or disruptions at any other shared campus schools.
Author?Westminsterboy 17:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  fights at shared campus schools 

message: The original wording of 'a Catholic child...' is correct. Although the statement that 'no child is born Catholic' is of course correct, we are talking here about admission to Catholic schools. For such admissions, there has to be evidence that the child is actually being raised as a Catholic (e.g. that he or she was baptised in a Catholic church). The 'child of Catholic parents' definition includes some children who would not get priority, and excludes some children who would:
*A child whose parents are different religions - i.e. one Catholic, one Protestant Christian/Muslim/Whatever - but who is being raised as a Catholic, would get admission priority even though he does not have two Catholic parents
*A child whose parents are both Catholics, but who (for moral grounds etc.) have decided not to raise the child in any religion (e.g. preferring to allow him/her to choose any religion or none when old enough to make an independent choice) would not get priority even though both of his parents are Catholic
I hope these two situations help explain why it is the religion of the child that is most important in this situation, not the religion of the parents. Cynical 21:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Catholic child' vs 'child of Catholic parents' 

message: There's about twenty Catholic sixth form colleges (i.e. about 20% of the sector)- Should this be mentioned here or elsewhere? Zagubov (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic Sixth Form College 

message: It seems to me taht this article gives undue weight to untypical schools and policies. The number of politicians pushing for catholic schools to be closed is entirely marginal, for example, and the legal case brought againts shared camouses is similarly a marginal case. A clearer general pictire needs to be drawn. imhoJohncmullen1960 (talk) 07:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  improving the article