Talk:Amniotic fluid

message: this page is totally uncited and unreferenced!
70.72.35.188 (talk)
:Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).  WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: references

message: This article referes to only human, what about other mammals? How this helps feed the baby is also not explained. I have found uses of this fluid (of cow) as plant boosters! Nothing of such uses is given here. I very much feel the article needs to be expanded to introduce all such aspects of this fluid. Pathare Prabhu (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Amniotic fluid of other mammals?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Amniotic fluid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090406140738/http://www.isscr.org:80/public/briefings/amniotic.htm to http://www.isscr.org/public/briefings/amniotic.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090419122255/http://www.biocellcenter.it:80/repository/scentific_review.pdf to http://www.biocellcenter.it/repository/scentific_review.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Amniotic fluid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009220104/http://www.babyworld.co.uk/faq/individualfaq.asp?Section=Pregnancy&SubSection=Your+body&query=&opt=&page=&question=1711 to http://www.babyworld.co.uk/faq/individualfaq.asp?Section=Pregnancy&SubSection=Your+body&query=&opt=&page=&question=1711
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Contains a picture of an aborted foetus. I think for sensitivity this should be removed. FraserMackie (talk) 20:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not. So? What follows? Besides, there used to be "spoiler warning"-type blinds on disturbing images (at least on Polish wiki, mostly used for nudity) – would this be censorship too? 89.64.12.232 (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amniotic Fluid page