Talk:Dance Dance Revolution

message: I am not 100% sure of it but it seems that the game appear behind Madona in her latest video clip.
Maybe worst adding to the page?
:It was definately in the video for "Hung Up" in the album "Confessions on a Dance Floor". However, she didn't really play the game, it was more of a prop to dance around. Mezzaninex 23:40, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madona video clip 

message: Are the current release dates posted correct?  I see that the Japanese release date was recently changed so now the article shows that the game came out in the U.S. before it did in Japan, which I find difficult to believe.  Are there any sources for these dates?  --TheKoG 20:17, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release dates 

message: In the section "songs and difficulty levels", the article lists the Sidestream as a type of step skill. It is a step combo such as Left-Down-Right, where the left and right steps are hit with the same foot. I have never heard of it called a 'sidestream' before in my life; I've exclusively heard people refer to this step as a 'crossover' (seeing that your foot should cross over to the opposite side of the pad if performed properly). Can any other DDR players confirm this, or is it possible that the term "crossover" is just a localized term from my reigon (northeast US)?
I agree.  I have always used the terms "Crossover" (for a pattern such as RDL, alternating feet) and "Candle" (for a pattern such as ULD, alternating feet, where your foot crosses the center square), and rarely, if ever have I heard the term "Sidestream."  I have changed the article to define these two terms in the stead of Sidestream, feel free to clarify my edit even further if you like!  --Rahzel 16:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDR step technique mislabeled 

message: The "In Popular Culture" section of this page is getting too long.  We don't have room for everyone's favorite DDR television reference, movie quote, or whatever.  I think that this section either needs to be deleted entirely (under the reasoning that DDR is becoming more and more popular culture itself) or streamlined to include just a few notable pop culture references.  Please reply with your thoughts.  Regards, Rahzel 18:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am still awaiting thoughts on this.  In the meantime, I don't think we should add any more items to this section unless they are extremely noteworthy--we don't need every single pop culture reference in this section.  --Rahzel 18:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm personally a bit of an inclusionist, but as per WP:NOT I think you make a very good case for trimming it down at the very least.  (In other words, If I Were King(TM) we'd keep the list -- but I'm not King, and I don't write the checks for Wikipedia, and by my interpretation of the rules, this would be an indiscriminate list of information and therefore not appropriate for Wikipedia -- so I concur and vote to trim down the list. --Jaysweet 19:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Suggestion rather than have "pop culture references", why not rewrite the entire section as prose exploring "influence on popular culutre". We seem to have enough details to warrent such a section. LinaMishima 20:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a fantabulous idea.  I'll do it if I have time in the next few days.  --Rahzel 06:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have sort of done this.  I have re-written this section to eliminate some of the unnecessary details, and (more importantly) to get rid of the list of "pop culture references" that keeps getting more and more bloated.  I think that this prose-paragraphencapsulates the main idea of what that section should be getting across, without the fanboy-isms.  Rahzel 21:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

text: "An interesting website is the popular Flash Flash Revolution. Rather than using a dance mat, the player uses the up, down, left and right controls on the keyboard. The game also gives the user the ability to control how they see the arrows, rather than just the traditional arrows at the top of the screen, they can be viewed from all sides of the field, allowing for an endless array of ways to play." This should be deleted as it is an obvious advertisement and cruft.--71.30.248.202 22:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture Section is Bloated 

message: There is no mention of doubles play in the article.
Doubles expands the gameplay from the 4 arrows on one pad to all 8 arrows on both pads.  Generally, doubles is reserved for more advanced players or those who are looking for a more challenging experience.  Many freestyle players expand from singles to doubles in order to allow for more freedom of movement.  Casual players avoid doubles because of the difficult learning curve and higher cost (generally twice) at arcades.
Technique and style should also be discussed.
:You know, you are quite right! I can't believe I didn't spot this problem last time I looked in here - and I'm almost exclusively a doubles player! LinaMishima 16:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubles? 

message: Flash Flash Revolution is probably the most popular DDR simulator.  Dance with Intensity is completely obsolete and is nearly impossible to find, Pydance is used by literally no one in the DDR simulation community, and Text Text Revolution is laughable. The only simulators really even worth mentioning are Stepmania and FFR. Stepmania for serious players and FFR for casual players, as well as some serious players. Why is it that certain people want to erase it from Wikipedia while other jokes are allowed to remain? Afrobean 21:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FFR 

message: on imdbpro there is aparently info about a ddr movie.  i do not have a pro account, so i cannot see any info on this,though it appears to have a trailer and some movie info.  if any one has a pro acocunt it would be super awsome to give a small amount of info about this.  also in yahoo espania there is some kinda trailer for a movie about people doing ddr that was released in spain.  it also has a imdb page.  i dont think it was mentioned in the article. http://imdb.com/title/tt0893400/maindetails  http://imdb.com/title/tt0807006/  Owenlars2 05:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This movie is mentioned in the article, under the In Popular Culture section.  Regards, Rahzel 22:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDR the movie 

message: I love the music. It's definately a unique style, but I dont know what to call it other than DDR music. It a happy bubblegum techno. I hate most techno. DDR is more of a cheery songs remixed/speeded up to a techno beat. I checked the Happy Hardcore article, doesn't mention DDR, but it seems to be a similar genre. Does the style have a name other than 'DDR Music?' Article doesn't even seem to mention the music style, even though if you heard the style you'd say it was DDRish.
:Me again. I found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bemani_musicians Seems its not a genre, but one group of musicians that I like so much.
If I'm not mistaken, the term for music like 'Butterfly' is Happy House. I've only heard one or two songs in DDR that could really qualify as Hardcore (Namely FAXX, I think...), though.
Hope that helps~ 24.13.93.171 20:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs more info on the music 

message: At the beginning of the article, it says "For other uses, see German Democratic Republic." Why is that? I would understand if DDR redirected here, but DDR is a disambiguation page itself. It seems unnecessary to me, since nobody's going to type in "Dance Dance Revolution" if they're looking for the German Democratic Republic. However, I don't want to edit it out if there's a good reason to have it there. Thoughts? アンジェリーク★Angelique 22:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 

message: I noticed that the first item listed in the references section is the Wikipedia article on beatmania IIDX, and the place where this citation occurs is the section on Japanese arcade releases. This is a problem because Wikipedia is obviously not a reliable source for itself. I'm not sure exactly how to deal with this problem (maybe ?), so I am posting here to get some input. Thank you. 70.176.124.200 19:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify: The problem was a <ref> tag used to link within Wikipedia, which is inadvisable. When I said "Wikipedia is not a reliable source for itself," I was alluding to WP:RSEX#Use of electronic or online sources and WP:NOR#Citing oneself. I have replaced the <ref> tag with the corresponding wikilink. 70.176.124.200 21:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I already fixed this. Please disregard the inquiry. Thank you. 70.176.124.200 01:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct essay page that explains this situation is Wikipedia:Don't use internal sources for verification. 70.176.124.200 06:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with references 

message: the value of ddr as exercise is a topic of debate in some circles. The article currently states that the calories burned have not been measured, but see this article. Some work here may be in order (I'm not really qualified to do it - perhaps someone with expertise will take it on).
Training and Testing 
 Int J Sports Med 2002; 23: 125-129
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-20132 
  
 
 
Aerobic Demands of the Dance Simulation Game 
  
B.  Tan1, A.  R.  Aziz1, K.  Chua1, K.  C.  Teh1 
1 Sports Medicine and Research Centre, Singapore 
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the intensity and energy cost of dance simulation in relation to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) recommendations on the quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory fitness, and to assess its safety. Forty subjects (21 males and 19 females, age 17.5 ± 0.7 years) had their heart rate (HR) and oxygen consumption (V˙O2) measured during maximal treadmill exercise and during a dance simulation game at a self-selected level of difficulty. They were monitored for injuries during and after the study. The results showed a mean HR of 137 beats × min-1 (139 beats × min-1 for males and 136 beats × min-1 for females) and a mean V˙O2 of 24.6 ml × kg-1 × min-1 (25.3 ml × kg-1 × min-1 for males and 23.8 ml × kg-1 × min-1 for females) during the dance simulation game test, with an estimated energy expenditure of 480 W (550 W for males and 410 W for females). The dance intensity only just meets the minimum ACSM guidelines, so dancer-players will need to play for extended periods to improve or maintain cardiorespiratory fitness or to lose weight. No injuries occurred during 201 hours of dance time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brucefulton (talk • contribs) 20:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  exercise 

message: I have moved the list of DDR game releases to the dedicated article, all information that was unique to this page has been verified for accuracy and merged with new and existing information. The main discussion is at Talk:List of Dance Dance Revolution games. AeronPrometheus (talk) 10:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of DDR releases moved 

message: Does anyone know the official reason for the name change in the European terrortries? more importantly, is there a cite for it? 81.149.182.210 (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Konami seems to have simply chosen to have the series go by another name in the European Union. No reason, they're weird like that. Probably the same reason why TwinBee from Japan is called RainbowBell in North America. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 18:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dancing Stage 

message: Should this be turned into paragraphs, broken off into a seperate article (The "this is partial list" sounds like there's a full list to be found somewhere. There isn't), or deleted and a select few links remain and woven into the paragraphs regarding the subject? I'd like to hear other editor's viewpoint on this. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 04:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What I'm probably going to do is simply delete it. It's a hacked together list that people seem to add to for the sake of adding. The point regarding similar and clone style games could be perfectly made by linking to a select few of these within prose style paragraphs. The rest would need to pass NOTABILITY to even be worth a mention. If no one objects, I'll make the change in the next few days. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 07:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Overhauled section. Any complaints or does everyone like it better like this? --AeronPrometheus (talk) 06:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar games list 

message: No where in the DDR page does it discuss the legality of import machines from japan or other countries. I think this information would be a good inclusion into the article if one can find it. JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 22:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it would probably SeeAlso to the 3rdMix and Extreme articles since there's a significant amount of information regarding the imports and bootlegs of those two in particular. What else do you see the article lacking? --AeronPrometheus (talk) 04:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality of Import Arcade Machines in the USA 

message: In the future, it might be useful to have a section detailing the impact of DDR on popular culture, including references within other works.  Since being released in 1998, DDR has really become ubiquitous - due to the highly accessible nature of the core concept, a large percentage of people (at least in the US) know what it is.--Ebness86 (talk) 23:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop Culture Legacy 

message: It would be nice if someone could put up the songs and the bands.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.181.218 (talk) 01:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On that logic...songs are covered in the specific articles for the games. ViperSnake151  Talk   02:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And List of Dance Dance Revolution songs, if ever finished, will list them all in one location.  æronphonehome  05:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songs? 

message: That anyone trying to flout there own abilities by planting their names on the article are terrible people. Remember two things, no one cares to look at the previous history for an article and it's a lot easier for us to revert this vandalism than it is for you to cause it, thank you. ^_^  æronphonehome  05:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: It is generally accepted

message: I recently found on channelbeat.com offering a DDR 8th Plus PCB and DDR solo 7th Mix, true are false?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silrox9 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unlisted DDR Games 

message: Anyone know why konami postponed the PS3 version? And, anyone know the status of it?
DJAikou (talk) 06:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDR for PS3!?!? 

message: This article is marked as needing a screenshot and other images.  However, there are several images already on the page including a game screenshot and a cabinet photograph.  Can someone clarify what kind of image the article still needs? Tim Pierce (talk) 13:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The only actual screenshot is for an emulator that takes after DDR, there are actually no screenshots from any DDR game in this article. Otherwise there are a lot of good images already in use, yes. æronphonehome  13:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  image requested? 

message: in your long rambling text that you added about the minutiae of every meaningless part of the video game (complete with original charts), there are no citations. wikipedia is not a place for you to write your infinite stream of details on everything Japan and related -- actually it is, but it shouldn't be. maybe if you cited some real articles the text would contain more noteworthy information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.119.79.218 (talk) 06:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  hey OCD video game nerds 

message: "Didder" currently redirects to this article, presumably because it is a slang pronunciation of the abbreviation DDR.
I have doubts about whether this is appropriate. For example, it appears to be an archaic form of the word "dither," as seen in that article in an image of a dictionary page. Does anyone have ideas on changing "didder" to redirect elsewhere or converting it to a disambiguation? SoledadKabocha (talk) 16:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Should I also discuss this on Talk:Dither? SoledadKabocha (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Didder" redirect 

message: There aren't enough dedicated articles on "the history" of DDR to warrant its own article. The unsourced stuff should be removed and the rest merged into a history/overview section within the main series article. czar 15:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[History of Dance Dance Revolution]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dance Dance Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080430133304/http://foonmix.nothing.sh/ to http://foonmix.nothing.sh/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified