lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Comedy film

message: The article discusses the change in the quality of comedy as of late, the changes over time (briefly) and the popularity of the changes. I figured if anyone was intersted in adding info, I'd leave it here for them:
-- Harish (Talk) - 16:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful source? 

message: Maximilianklein (talk) 23:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat Genres

message: Hello everyone, I've been assigned this article to work on for my editing class. I wanted to introduce myself to you and also seek advice from you on what should be done for this article. I noticed in the history that the majority of the actual history of comedy film was taken down and put into other pages that seemed more relatable. I'm wondering if bringing back the history section would be best for the article. If we were to take the  section and use it as an outline for bringing back the history of comedy film, I think it'd help make the article more developed and easier for readers to read. Let me know if you have any edits suggestions; I'm excited to hear from you Allonsyalyssa (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to add an empty section for under the heading of "history" for anyone willing to go in and re-edit the page to bring back the previously erased history. Allonsyalyssa (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a history section that could use more edits and have some other subsections added to them. I also removed the military comedy films but referenced a few from a larger list. I think most definitely the history section needs more edits than anything. Allonsyalyssa (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello & Helping Out 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dsackey (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse

message: — Assignment last updated by Ahashmi97x (talk) 19:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Media and Culture Theory - MDC 254

message: — Assignment last updated by Highspeed2 (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250H VL1

message: The new rules would allow 
companies 
that sell products with no 38.96.229.18 (talk) 02:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ELRIC 

message: the epic tales of captain under pants 2001:B07:646C:9E20:6C19:BAC9:DE82:C103 (talk) 19:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain under pants 

message: — Assignment last updated by Michelle312 (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II
File talk:Ph regions and provinces.png

message: # New province - Shariff Kabununsuan
# Palawan now at Western Visayas
# Possibly new Dinagat province.
--Howard the Duck 08:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map needs updating 

message: * Can we include KIG on the map?
* Why is Zamboanga City separated from Zamboanga Sibugay but not Cebu, Davao etc. which are also independent cities? --Filipinayzd (talk) 10:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Philippine map 

message: Zamboanga City MUST have distinct color as Zamboanga City alone. it should NOT be associate that city to Zamboanga del Sur for Zamboanga City is never and/or never been part of Zamboanga del Sur.
Zamboanga City is an Independent and a Chartered City, having it's own jurisdiction and Political Governmental affair. Zamboanga City is Zamboanga City. again, an Independent and a Chartered City in the Zamboanga Peninsula Region. zamboangueño latinos are very much sensitive with regards to this kind of issue. to be correct, it must be correctly indicated that Zamboanga Peninsula Region are composed and/or comprises of the ff: Zamboanga del Norte with Dipolog City as Capital city, Zamboanga del Sur with Pagadian as Capital City and New Regional Center, Zamboanga Sibugay with Ipil as it's Capital Municipality, Chartered City of Isabela and the Independet-Chartered City of Zamboanga as the Regional Industrial & Commercial Center and Region's University Belt. thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.42.64.98 (talk) 08:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Correction

message: Is it possible for the creator/s of this map to create an animated (.gif) version of the formation of PH provinces? There might be sufficient data for that since all provinces have foundation days and such. A finished product of this map might resemble this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Canada_provinces_evolution_2.gif  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.6.230 (talk) 03:22, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do it. –hueman1 (talk) 10:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still doing it. –hueman1 (talk) 09:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated version of formation of provinces 

message: As of May 2015, there are now 18 regions of the Philippines. Negros Island Region was approved by the President on 29 May 2015. The new region is comprised of the provinces of Negros Occidental and Negros Oriental, as well as the highly urbanized independent city of Bacolod.
Kindly update the maps as soon as possible. Thanks! Jmsay (talk) 12:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Philippine Region
Talk:Pete (Disney)

message: Descriptions of his various appearances are getting too long. It is not necessary to outline the plot in full. The "kingdom hearts" section is particularly bad for this. I think it is sufficient here to name the work he appears in and perhaps give a brief description of Pete's part in it, with a link to the relevant article. Any other opinions? Mediatech492 (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonsense, clearing the redundant trivia from the appearances section will make that section more useable, and have no affect on the rest of the article at all. Mediatech492 (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: These are the meat of the article, not trivia. Dimadick (talk) 18:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearances Descriptions 

message: I don't have the privilege to edit this page, but if you can, you should edit the Finnish voice actor part to be:
Markku Riikonen (1992-2000)
Tuomo Rysti (2001-now)
Thanks Blumbirde (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finnish name 

message: . Please revert your edit. Not only did you add an unreliable source but you are engaging in original research since the book does not state that Bletcher first voiced Pete in the Mail Pilot, but that he did all the way back in 1932's Klondike Kid. That of course contradicts what Bletcher himself says. LittleJerry (talk) 01:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pete voice 

message: He was called Peg-Leg Pete in the Oswald the Lucky Rabbit era too.  About 30 seconds into Ozzie of the Mounted from 1928 there's a wanted poster with his name written on it.
There are a couple of places in this article which ought to be updated with that info.  Basically the into paragraph, and also a couple of other spots which suggest his name was more amorphous in the early days. 2600:100A:B12E:50E3:9D6:DB90:93F6:532D (talk) 01:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More name history 

message: Not even sure if this is important / trivia / or just miscellaneous Pete … but in the Disney Star Wars toy line - Mickey as Luke, Minnie as Leia ,Goofy as C3P0 & Darth Vader (!?!),etc. - Pete, with two legs, was cast as Boba Fett. ( Action figure, pins, etc.) 75.107.41.198 (talk) 22:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pete in the Star Wars toy line. 

message: Pete has appeared occasionally in store displays, along Main Street U.S.A. over the years, but, he has had one permanent appearance at Disneyland in Toontown. On one of the the building upper windows, near the Roger Rabbit ride, appears Pete’s face and his company name, “Pete’s Prosthetics “. (Which may or may not be in poor taste.).75.107.41.198 (talk) 22:30, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pete’s appearance in Disneyland.
Talk:Organizational culture

message: — Assignment last updated by Trolleyman32 (talk) 05:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Communication Theory

message: I've reduced the bloat by half, but it's still mostly academic/consultant nonsense. More deletions to come. That said, I'd appreciate your feedback and will happily fix any errors I've made that you tell me about. Cheers! Lfstevens (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyediting this disaster 

message: We are in the middle of an era of huge cultural change within many organizations, none of which made it into this article. I am not an SME and so am not the one to add it, but here are some examples that would make such connections and make the piece a far more interesting and relevant read:
- Ivies: school spirit/merit/honesty/honor/free speech => cheating ok/equity/BDS/R2S => defunding pro-Palestinian student groups
- Google: "don't be evil" => equity, etc./Damore incident => focus on mission 
- X: equity/work-life balance/"misinformation" => hardcore/freedom of speech
- US military: honor/achievement => DEI
- nonprofits: mission => internal purity => ??? 
Separately, need to talk about:
- How have typical cultures evolved over time? E.g., many companies moved from tight dress codes to casual Fridays, which reflects a general loosening of culture. Many organizations have changed from externally focused to internally focused, in some cases losing sight of their missions. How has the shift in balance of workers towards women and other minorities affected culture?
Lfstevens (talk) 01:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The difficulty with examples is finding reliable sources that discuss them. I'll see if I can find something about culture change over time.Psyc12 (talk) 12:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing connection to the real world 

message: Cultural equilibrium, according  to  okpara David ikemdinachi , would be a state where a person can maintain their own cultural identity while also being open to learning about other cultures and incorporating aspects of those cultures into their own life. It's almost like a cultural "sweet spot" where a person can maintain their sense of self while also expanding their horizons. 
So in a way, cultural equilibrium is like cultural "goldilocks zone," where a person can find the "just right" balance between maintaining their own culture and learning from others. 102.91.4.55 (talk) 11:47, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. Examples? Lfstevens (talk) 01:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural equilibrium
Talk:Mass of Paul VI

message: A de facto renaming of this article is taking place.  has created a redirect named Post-Vatican II Mass (fair enough) and has begun to replace links pointing to Mass of Paul VI with the new redirect. I am not cool with this. We agreed that the current name of this article is the most appropriate one. Therefore there is no basis to arbitrarily begin renaming it per the failed proposal. Elizium23 (talk) 09:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's poor behavior, .  Cut it out. --PluniaZ (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry that Elizium23 and PluniaZ presumed that my edits were a bad-faith attempt to circumvent the negative decision against moving to "Vatican II Mass" (not "Post-Vatican II Mass", which was not proposed nor even discussed, nor was it a positive decision that "Mass of Paul VI" was the most appropriate term possible).  For more, see Talk:Post-Vatican II Mass.  Bealtainemí (talk) 07:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note this.  Bealtainemí (talk) 07:48, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

text: @Ozone742: no; as of the promulgation of Traditionis custodes the Holy See has deprecated the terms "Ordinary Form" and "Extraordinary Form" and therefore they are projected to see usage reduced and relegated to only Traditionalist and dissenting circles. Elizium23 (talk) 01:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Francis refers to the Mass of Paul VI as the "unique expression" of the Roman Rite, which pundits are saying is a repudiation of the dichotomy suggested by Benedict XVI. (It may also be a curious slap in the face to the Anglican Use or Divine Worship: The Missal, which is a most recently revised "expression" of the Roman Rite in its own right.) Elizium23 (talk) 01:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  De facto rename 

message: It seems that the liturgy used in 95% of parishes, religious communities, missions, etc. of the Catholic Church is without a doubt the most commonly-used, and it bears mention in the article so that people who are reading who haven't the faintest clue what different Masses look like, can differentiate the most commonly-used liturgy from less commonly-used ones. Elizium23 (talk) 12:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The most commonly-used liturgy 

message: I take it that my correction ("published by him in 1970") is the right one to make, given the later sentence "The editions of the Mass of Paul VI Roman Missal (1970, 1975, 2002)..". Harfarhs (talk) 12:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Published when exactly?
Talk:Lists of dragons

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 14:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Lists of dragons →  – This page seems like a bit all over the place and has been proposed to be deleted a few times it seems. It's acting mostly as a disambiguation page and seems like it would benefit from properly being one Ingwina (talk) 09:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 April 2022 

message: If you listen to the story in the song  puff the magic dragon it's a sad story but it sounds like A Fairytale you can't make up. 
unless you claimed it was fake, And then took credit for the dragon by calling it puff the magic dragon and said it's a song about getting high.
Then had the song published. 24.140.188.82 (talk) 02:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  please add puff the Magic dragon to the list
Talk:Abecedarian

message: As per the below commenter as well, I don't think this article reflects historical accuracy. The only references are A)dictionaries/thesauruses/etc. which establish only that this word has been used in the English language with this meaning and B)the Catholic Encyclopedia from no later than 1913. It is notable that this entry does not even appear in the current version of the Catholic Encyclopedia. It seems very likely that the story presented herein is not actually true, or at the very least that there is no reliable historical evidence that these events ever occurred or this sect ever existed as it is described. Additionally, the 1907 and 1913 versions of the Catholic encyclopedia give different other Anabaptist leaders as the supposed doctor who gave up his title of Doctor to follow this doctrine. This seems pretty clearly a lie, albeit probably a historical one and not a modern wiki forgery. Mathlaura (talk) 11:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to the article after encountering two references within a few days. Widely separated and completely unrelated books, and I cannot remember any previous references (though I have previously read a number of books from Umberto Eco, who wrote one of the books). Having said that, I didn't get much enlightenment from the Article... Shanen (talk) 05:57, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: I question the entire veracity of this article

message: The correct verb here is "effected," as it refers to a bringing about of something, rather than as an alteration or influence upon something.
Shouldn't this be merged with (or at least linked to) Zwickau prophets?--88.73.5.203 (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, affect is perfectly correct here. It is used in the sense of claim, pretend and the implication is that their 'absolute disdain for all human knowledge' was bogus, not genuine. (They didn't bring about this disdain). Compare with affected and affectation. This is arguably POV, but linguistically correct. Norvo (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Affected vs. Effected

message: Besides the dubiousness already expressed above, from what I can gather in older sources, "Abcedarian" seens just an epithet for the Zwickau prophets. (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.) rather than a distinct sect in itself. This article seems superfluous and should be merged. Walrasiad (talk) 03:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Zwickau prophets 

message: Respected sir/mam,
I have uploaded the pichttps://commons.m.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Men_from_Aryan_valley_dancing.jpg&oldid=698155248 
The reference of the pic is shared i want it to get deleted as soon as possible ,
This pic is own by me and please delete these pic as soon as possible from Wikipedia licence Minaro123 (talk) 09:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please delete the pic that I have uploaded on wikipedia
Talk:Flag of the Republic of China

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — MaterialWorks 13:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It would make no sense to time-gate this article to 1912-1949, the same flag is in use today. CMD (talk) 13:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. Taiwan has a big sovereignty problem, they're using the national flag of the defunct Republic of China, which the PRC and the international community views it a defunct state. Renaming this article to "Flag of China (1912–1949)" would be like the flag of South Africa during apartheid focusing solely on the mainland period. -142.113.183.163 (talk) 17:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

text:  Nay. The flags on Taiwan flown the Dutch, Spanish, Tunging, Qing, Japanese and ROC banners throughout its history. It has a sovereignty problem anyway. -142.113.183.163 (talk) 17:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

text:  Not exactly. This flag that Taiwan uses is actually the historical but defunct flag of the ROC. Changing the names would render the issue moot. -142.113.183.163 (talk) 17:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The ROC is Taiwan. 162 etc. (talk) 19:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

text: OP has a history of deliberately ignoring COMMONNAME or obtusely interpreting WP:NC-CN to create POV edits that - among other things - avoid/remove referring to the PRC as "China", and referring to the ROC/Taiwan as "China". Time to stop, OP. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 19:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 October 2023
Talk:Georges Guibourg

message: Hi all,
I just fixed a link to a disambiguation page and I couldn't help but notice a style issue:
:Mantes-la-Ville, Yvelines, Île-de-France, France
I know it's usually the way it is done in the U.S., but a more natural way would be to write this:
:Mante-la-Ville (Yvelines), France
You guys can fix it if you feel like it.
User:Bruguiea 01:27, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style of location
Talk:Bullfighting

message: Hey folks, my attention got captured by recent edits in the section, with a small (so far) edit-warring whether to call Catalonia as a Spanish region (the formula hated by Catalan nationalists) or an autonomous community (which sounds better for some, making it sound less Spanish). Turns out, entire section is poorly written now, with its intro speaking about Catalonia, then jumping to Canary Islands which were first to ban bullfighting in 1991, then jumping back to Catalonia and essentially repeating the intro. I suggest the entire section to be reworked in chronological order, speaking about Canary Islands stuff first, then going into Catalonia situation. With regards to how call it, I think the formulation in the current Catalonia sub-section is the best compromise, which calls it one of Spain's seventeen Autonomous Communities - perhaps it sounds better for pro-Catalans than calling it straight Spanish, but still hints that currently Catalonia is a region of Spain, which is good to know to make sense of the follow up text, describing how Spanish courts overruled the ban. Birdofpreyru (talk) 19:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law/Spain section should be re-written
Talk:Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy

message: Anyone think this list should be removed? The article is about the Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy.
:Nah, leave it there. GoodDay 19:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Goal Scoring Leaders Prior to 1999

message: The title of the article is Maurice 'Rocket' Richard Trophy, while the title of the trophy in the infobox is Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy. Note the different quotes- we should fix this up for consistency.-Wafulz 18:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hard to tell, but I looked at the image and I think it uses Maurice "Rocket" Richard with the double quotes, but I have no idea what the manual of style says we should use. -- Scorpion0422 19:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the image definitely uses double quotes. We should follow with the same style (see "She Shoulda Said 'No'!" for a similar instance).-Wafulz 19:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semantics 

message: At one time, this article listed the number of times the top few teams had finished with the top goal-scorer/Richard Trophy. Where did this information go? MrArticleOne (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Team Totals
Talk:David Ahenakew

message: I am not sure how to state his ethnicity if that is the correct term.  The artivle should mention that he is 'aboriginal'.  Is 'Aboriginal' a tribe, nation, ethnicity, something else? Is this a correct sentence: David Ahenakew is an Aborigine?  Geo8rge (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indian or Aboriginal are both fine. WritersCramp (talk) 19:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aboriginal? 

message: Not clear from the references.Geo8rge (talk) 19:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he born in Ontario or Saskatchewan? 

message: I've removed the following links from the article for the time being, as they were being used incorrectly. A news article about the article subject is valid to cite as a footnoted reference for specific statements of fact in the article, but it isn't appropriate or correct format to simply add an article as a straight external link. The following links may be readded to the article as proper references if anybody wants to go through them to review what statements they may be suitable for, but they don't belong as a plain list under the "External links" heading. Bearcat (talk) 16:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External links