Talk:Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:35, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: can somebody help me to put reference!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.160.26.223 (talk) 09:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  help  

message: The article reads that Emperor Aurangzeb had awarded the title "Chin Qilich Khan" in 1690-91 to Qamaruddin whereas the English translation of Jahangir's memoir the "Tuzak e Jahangiri" reads as follows:
" News came that Shāh Beg Khān, the governor of Qandahar, had reached the parganah of Shor,* which is his jagir. I determined to give Kabul to him and return to Hindustan. A petition came from Rāja Bīrsing-deo that he had made a prisoner of his nephew, who had been creating a disturbance and had killed many of his men. I ordered him to send him to the fort of Gwalior to be imprisoned there. The parganah of Gujrāt* in the Panjab Sarkār I bestowed on Shīr Khān, the Afghan. I promoted Chīn Qilīj, son of Qilīj Khān, to the rank of 800 personal and 500 horse.
So was it Aurangzeb or his grandfather Jahangir who had awarded this title?
Source: http://persian.packhum.org/persian/main?url=pf%3Ffile%3D11001081%26ct%3D26%26rqs%3D425%26rqs%3D426%26rqs%3D448%26rqs%3D449%26rqs%3D691%26rqs%3D692
Lutfullah (talk) 18:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia states that the title "Chin Qilich Khan" was awarded by Emperor Aurangzeb Alamgir but 'Tuzak e Jahangiri' states otherwise 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Qamar-ud-din Khan, Asif Jah I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070416073722/http://www.hydonline.com/cityscape/history/nizams.htm to http://www.hydonline.com/cityscape/history/nizams.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: His name is too long, with all titles. Th article's name should not be long, so I changed it. Hagoromo's Susanoo (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name correction 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "columbia&TOI":
From Hyderabad: 
* 
From History of Hyderabad: 
* 
From Nizam of Hyderabad: 
* 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I]]