lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Robert Kiyosaki

message: I did some quick cleanup of the article, removing many poor and unreliable sources. At this point it's pretty clear that the article is using far too much of Kiyosaki's own self-promotion as references, rather than independent sources. I've asked for help at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Robert_Kiyosaki --Hipal (talk) 17:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV and reference problems 

message: In the "Personal" section(s) there's little information.  In particular, it's odd that a WP article on someone whose fame comes from a series of Rich Dad, Poor Dad books and seminars has no information about his real Dad ("Poor Dad") nor his financial mentor ("Rich Dad").  (Is he being fair to his late "Poor Dad"?)  A major business partner online is his wife Kim.
Also, the article should summarize the main points of Kiyosaki's financial advice, system, life advice and conservative sociopolitical views. (He's still bitter about the contempt for returning Vietnam War veterans that he experienced in the 1970's.) 2603:8080:2102:63D5:75FC:5AC0:5DC6:7EBA (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Why nothing about the two "Dad"s that made Kiyosaki famous?  His system.

message: The first sentence states "Robert Toru Kiyosaki (born April 8, 1947) is a Japanese-American businessman and author."  Why is his ancestry included here? I didn't see anything about his race or connection to Japan in the rest of the article.  I thought it was not normal in Wik to include racial/religious/ethnic details in the introduction if they are not particularly relevant. 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:99E4:A581:6D73:850 (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant for lede? 

message: The Rich Dad was real, and his name is Richard Kimi. Born in 1925, this Hawaiian created a hotel chain in the Aloha State, and taught the now-famous Cashflow Quadrant to many students, among them a young Japanese American named... Robert Kiyozaki.
He prefered a tranquil, annonymous lifestyle as to avoid any outpouring of fame owing to his status as Kiyosaki's RD. He died in 2009.
For more info thre's a very read here: http://www.freedommentor.com/robert-kiyosaki-real-life-rich-dad/ Ernestogon (talk) 00:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kiyozaki's Rich Dad was a real man 

message: This is irrelevant and misleading without also citing his net worth. 09:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Billion in Debt
Talk:Carmen Miranda

message: The section "Legacy" has 1st paragraph
:According to Brazilian musician Caetano Veloso, Miranda was first a cause of both pride and shame, and later, a symbol that inspired the merciless gaze we began to cast upon ourselves; Carmen conquered 'White' America as no other South American has done or ever would, in an era when it was enough to be 'recognizable Latin and Negroid' in style and aesthetics to attract attention." For Veloso and other musicians contemplating a career abroad, Miranda's pioneering experiences continue to loom as a point of reference. Miranda helped establish and transform the relationship between Brazilian musicians and American producers that now has created several remarkable transnational collaborations  ... To think of her is to think about the complexity of this relationship".
The placement of quotation marks is off, but I'm not sure where they should appear.--Nø (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote?
Talk:500 (number)

message: I have hereby moved this discussion to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers, where I think it belongs. If someone can figure out the right way to redirect the above community discussion thing over there too, please do so!--Niels Ø (noe) 23:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: One page for [[500 (number)]] through [[599 (number)]]?

message: is not represented here, even though other HTTP status codes are. Why? Graue 02:36, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It could just be that whoever added the other status codes just skipped that one over. Since it's listed at this page, which is official enough for me, I will add it. PrimeFan 21:45, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  500 Internal Server Error 

message: 573 isn't "the konami number" because of ddr, it has been associated with konami since the beginning.
From Konami:
"Konami is represented by the goroawase number "573". "Five" in Japanese is go, changed to the voiceless form ko; "7" in Japanese is nana shortened to na; "3" in Japanese is mittsu, shortened to mi; "573" = ko-na-mi."
The way it is represented in the article suggests that the song (specifically I believe the article is referring to MAX300 and its remixes) is the reason for this number being associated with Konami, when the relationship existed long before the connection to that particular song (or anything from DDR).  That being said, I intend to change this article to be less specific about the reasons (or more specific depending on your point of view) and reword it to indicate the actual relationship.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiger yamato (talk • contribs) 21:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: back batting 203.215.178.72 (talk) 07:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 573 as the konami number

message: Where does this information go? Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:07, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 587 - usual TCP port number for [[Mail submission agent]]

message: A few weeks ago, I was thinking about Japanese numbers and their pronunciations, when I figured out 567 in sequence would be pronounced "korona" / コロナ. Immediately, I associated that number with the 2019-202x coronavirus pandemic due to 5 being go (remove dakuten diacritics and you get ko), 6 being roku (remove second syllable), and 7 being nana (use na once). Even a Japanese hotel had to lower their nightly rate to 567 yen because they had lost business due to the pandemic. Nmchlngy4 (talk) 00:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  567 as an euphemism for coronavirus pandemic 
Talk:600 (number)

message: This page indicates that 600 is an "apologetic number".  I can't seem to find any definition of what an apologetic number is, have never heard of it, and everything I can find referencing an "apologetic number" just refers back to this page.  Unless someone can provide a definition, it seems that this is just bogus information that has been spread around. 128.42.217.65 (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have removed it. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apologetic number? 

message: Makes complete sense and is a perfect time to remove useless junk info on that page. Pascal.Tesson 18:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed this page from Wikiproject Judaism, but left the wikicode to retain the discussion. --Eliyak T·C 19:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I am Jewish, and it's not important, except possibly to Kabbalahists.   — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 03:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merger from 629 

message: I just started going about editing and it appears there is some rules that I have missed reading.I am starting to read the guidelines but there are tons so I would appreciate if someone point me in the right direction to some definition of significance. I am confused because under number 713, the vault number in a fiction was noted, 558 in deep space nine, and 490 as number of available pokemons. i would normally categorize such cases as trivia  with varying levels of triviality but since trivia is not allowed as implied by the revert on 694, how do i know whether a particular piece of info is considered significant?Kzl.zawlin (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: oops just realized that it's on top. my bad Kzl.zawlin (talk) 00:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition of significance 

message: I just reverted the addition of "687...number of people in the Supreme People's Assembly of North Korea."  I don't think such coincidental counts should be included.  But I notice that there are a few others like it: the number of people killed in a hurricane disaster, the name of an Australian telephone socket, the area codes for Phoenix, and Minneapolis and so on.  Do others these kind of entries should be purged? SpinningSpark 08:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coincidental counts 
Talk:700 (number)

message: :777 = 3 × 7 × 37, sphenic number, sometimes said to be the number of Jesus because it's three sevens together
I downloaded a Bible from Project Gutenberg and searched in it for "777", "seven hundred and seventy-seven", "seventy-seven and seven hundred" and a few other permutations and found nothing. On the other hand, "seven times seven" (which is 49) occurs a lot in the Bible, and occasionally other powers of 7. So if we can't find any basis for 777 being Jesus's number, then the statement ought to be removed. PrimeFan 22:41, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  777 is Jesus's number? 

message: If you add up the numeric value the greek letters of Jesus's name you get 888 and his name appears 888 times in the New Testament. 8 is the number of new and is one more than 7 (# of completion).
:Hm, interesting. At what theological conference was this tidbit first brought up and what was the name of the theologian bringing it up? PrimeFan 22:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, how did you get that? I checked with two diferent Swedish Bibles online, and the closest result I got was 787 hits on Jesus... give us a proof, and the link to the searchengine you use. Adville (talk) 23:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 888 is actually Jesus's number

message: The disambigs for 700 and 797 should be split off onto their own articles. 70.49.125.226 (talk) 10:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the additional material for 797, as undue weight here, and mostly undue weight or incorrect even in an article specifically about 797.  I oppose the split for 700, but there, at least, the split article might be somewhat appropriate.  I don't see the need for it, but I can see that others may differ.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In case a disambiguation page is wanted (not sure why), a split of this article is not needed. I have therefore removed the template. Cheers, Greenodd (talk) 17:53, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split off disambigs
Talk:800 (number)

message: 829 is not a happy number; someone change please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.128.34.209 (talk) 02:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  829 is not a happy number 
Talk:900 (number)

message: i don't know why, i didn't make links, but ISBN Group Identifier is showing wit links. Numerao 20:32, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN glitch 

message: The name of a recent Burmese anti-Muslim movement, in reply to Muslims' use of 786... AnonMoos (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 969 in the news

message: : "969" is a notable number because the age of Methuselah. He was the oldest person of the Biblical history.
179.98.235.119 (talk) 08:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is already in the article. Imaginatorium (talk) 08:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The age of [[Methuselah]]
Talk:Sideroxylon grandiflorum

message: Does anyone know how tall this tree gets?  Any article about a tree should include its height.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.234.16.9 (talk) 04:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why? Temple's hypothesis was one of (nearly) obligatory mutualism. This has been roundly rejected. Read Cheke's account in Studies of Mascarene Island birds (pp 17-19) for details. While Cheke isn't exactly one of the most soft-spoken scientists I've come across, it is a potential career-breaker to call a hypothesis "folklore" and one does not do this lightly (except in private ;-) ). Cheke in effect details how Temple came to his hypothesis through a series of inadvertent errors and insufficient field study. -- Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 18:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tone is a hard thing to argue about, but I don't see any particularly large problems.  Perhaps some of the issues (such as the reasons for the decline of the tree) could be discussed without mentioning Temple at all, but the tone isn't that far off. Does someone who supports the tag have a suggested wording or summary of what they would change? Kingdon (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Argument too strong?

message: I have 8 seeds that range from 1 cm -1.4 cm wide and 1.6 cm -2.3 cm long. I have no turkeys. I planted 3 seeds last year as deep as the seed is long in potting soil. They never germinated. These current seeds have been weathered and I will plant them in a 6 inch pot on top of soil
(barely pushed in the soil lengthwise. I mixed the soil from equal parts cow manure, play sand, peat moss and vermiculite. I will cover the seeds with with 1/2 inch vermiculite and 1 inch of straw and water before they dry out, every day if necessary. I will place the pot in direct sunlight. Days average 80F nights 65F.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.70.108.224 (talk) 19:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  sideroxylon grandiflorum seeds 

message: Couldn't someone take and upload a picture of the thing before it goes extinct?
--176.199.192.165 (talk) 00:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Chemical structure

message: So, as noted here, there's an awful lot of information on chemical structures available in various parts of WP, but no coherence to them.  I'd like to use this page to start consolidating information on chemical structure, make sure articles are in the right place, and redirect/merge stubs and similar articles when necessary.
The first task is to try to find as many pages on chemical structure as you can.  I'll start out shortly; please feel free to add to the list below. --ES2 18:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry COTM-ish Thing (May): Chemical Structure Consolidation 

message: List creation in progress.  Feel free to add to this list.  Please sign your additions so I know you're interested. :) --ES2 18:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Chemical Structure Articles 

message: It has been proposed that Structure determination be merged here. Please discuss below. --Bduke (talk) 00:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fine; both articles are very short and mostly talk about the same thing. --Itub (talk) 10:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Isn't structure the correct name for what is described here? Geometry is the mathematical discipline and has nothing to do with a single structure, right? So geometry shouldn't be used in this article. --129.105.116.55 (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure vs. geometry 

message: This is a very important article, which in its present unsourced, and stub quality state, is useless as a wikilink, and unusable as an article to which people can be directed to learn. Because of its fundamental importance—in just one type of this work, thousands of chemists walk, daily, to NMR instruments to perform measurements toward this aim—and its state, I am calling for expert attention. Cheers. Le Prof.  71.201.62.200 (talk) 16:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Calling for expert attention
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mythology

message: *
* Users are discussing DUE/UNDUE relevance and fringe-ness inputs requested also at Talk:Jinn#Comparative mythology.
  
* Also A user has proposed updates for consideration at this sand box for the article Jinn. 
As a discussion facilitator fyi a WP:DUE discussion (some aspects may touch WP:Fringe) is at Talk:Jinn#Pre-RfC stage's WP:RSN#Hachette Livre and WP:ORN step. After RSN and WP:ORN step, RfC formatting is likely to be discussed at Talk:Jinn#Pre-RfC in a new sub section.
 Bookku    (talk) 04:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Input request 

message: There is an image deletion discussion about the file "Clash of the Titans poster"  in use at Andromeda (mythology). It demonstrates that the myth remains current, and that misinterpretation of the black princess of Aethiopia as a white woman is also continuing, a matter of racism in the eyes of some of the cited scholars. Project members are invited to contribute their opinions to the discussion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Andromeda (mythology)]] image deletion discussion 

message: According to this discussion on r/GreekMythology on reddit someone may be making bad faith edits on Greek Mythology pages.
https://www.reddit.com/r/GreekMythology/comments/1cy4ktx/anyone_else_noticed_someone_started_to_make_wrong/
Duggy 1138 (talk) 23:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible problem edits on Greek Mythology pages 

message: The two articles Perdix (mythology) and Talos (inventor) seem to both be describing the same mythical character, nephew of Daedalus who, according to legend, invented the potter's wheel, saw, and compass. However, there seems to be some disagreement in ancient sources about whether Perdix was the name of Daedalus's sister with a son named Talos, Calos, or Attalus, or whether Perdix was the name of Daedalus's nephew (with a mother of unknown name). Either way though, this story would be best consolidated in one wiki page instead of duplicated twice. (The mother herself doesn't seem to be independently notable, with ancient sources focused on her brother and son.) I don't feel qualified to judge which would be the most useful title of that article though. Does anyone who knows more about Greek mythology have any insight? –jacobolus (t) 23:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  If [[Perdix (mythology)]] is merged with [[Talos (inventor)]], what should the destination be? 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Iṣṭa-devatā (Hinduism)#Requested move 25 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Iṣṭa-devatā (Hinduism)#Requested move 25 May 2024]]
Talk:Methodology (software engineering)

message: This page seems to overlap significantly with software development process.
Is it possible to clarify which ideas belong on each page?
A methodology does not have anything to do with software, necessarily.  A SDP is perhaps part of a M and also a M could be part of a SDP.  Not the same M.  It must be possible to do as you say.  First step would be to have a very good definition of what each is.  Paul Beardsell 02:24, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: In current usage the term is so ambiguous that I think trying to pin it down is going to be problematic if not impossible.  My recommendation would be to keep the article as general and as short as possible.  Detailed discussion is rather pointless if there isn't agreement on what the word means.  Plus, most of what is here is already addressed elsewhere, so link to those articles. Address the sematical problems right off the bat, linking to the Methodology article rather than discussing the definition of the term in this article, and tossing the Criticism section altogether.  Leave the Examples section in because those are useful links to anyone exploring this subject; but acknowledge that there may be dispute as to whether these all constitute genuine "methodologies" but that a significant number of people would consider them so. Limbo socrates 16:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make it short 

message: Like pornography, maybe we can't easily define methodology, but we probably know one when we see one.
For example...
I would say RUP (Rational Unified Process) is a methodology, based on the object-oriented design and programming paradigm.
I would say Extreme Programming and Scrum are methodologies, based on the Agile programming paradigm.
Do you agree with this level of classification? Or am I off the mark? - Rlw (Talk) 17:39, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we agree on what a methodology is? 

message: This article is redundant with the Software development process article, and should be merged.  If there is no dispute on this point, you can help by migrating useful information from this article. Limbo socrates 19:09, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This must merge with Software Development Process
Template talk:States and union territories of India

message: I'm not sure it's wise to put newlines in here. It looks pretty rubbish on 800x600 (try it). I'd vote for replacing the newlines with |s and letting the user's browser do the wrapping. Admittedly you'd get some |s at the end of lines, but that's unavoidable. (Unless, of course, you get rid of the |s altogether and perhaps replace them with commas.) -- Timwi 00:31, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the newlines on both the Indian and Brazilian ones. What do you think now? - Chrism 17:48, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. However, for some reason, the table now insists on acquiring a minimum width of 700 pixels. I couldn't find a cause for this. What might be causing that? -- Timwi 19:20, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text:  Update: Sorry, it doesn't seem to be this table that does it. It's happening all over the site now. Has someone changed something in the site scheme? -- Timwi 19:22, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text:  Update^2: I'm sorry. It seems that what I encountered is actually a bug in my browser (Mozilla Firefox). No cause for worry on your part. -- Timwi 19:31, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: Unless you want to add the category to every article, could we leave it in the template ? -- User:Docu
:That sounds like a good idea to me.  – Quadell (talk) (help) 00:20, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
I disagree with Paddu above that the NCT should be separate.
Delhi should be included in the list of Union Territories. There is no such thing called a National Capital Territory. There are only states and union territories. It is incorrect to say that Delhi is no longer a Union Territory. Delhi still has an entry in the First Schedule, Part II of the Constitution of India (Union Territories).
"1. Delhi...The territory which immediately before the commencement of this Constitution was comprised in the Chief Commissioner’s Province of Delhi."
What the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 did was to change the name of the territory (besides introducing an elected assembly, etc.), it did not change the classification of the territory. Under the Constitution (Article I, Section 3):
"(3) The territory of India shall comprise— (a) the territories of the States; (b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule; and (c) such other territories as may be acquired."
Delhi is neither (a) or (c).
Also, Article 239AA of the Constitution says:
"239AA. Special provisions with respect to Delhi.—(1) As from the date of commencement of the Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991, the Union territory of Delhi shall be called the National Capital Territory of Delhi (hereafter in this Part referred to as the National Capital Territory) and the administrator thereof appointed under article 239 shall be designated as the Lieutenant Governor." (emphasis added)
This substantiates my claim that only the name was changed, not the classification.
So the correct way to refer to Delhi would be:
Union Territories:
... National Capital Territory of Delhi
or
Delhi (National Capital Territory)
--Manojb 10:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:States and territories of India]]