lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gerard Slevin

message: Removed source was http://www.heraldica.org/topics/national/ireland.htm, which says that the best source for it's information is http://www.ngw.nl/, which includes text from Wikipedia.  Removed due to circular referencing.  --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 01:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed source 
Talk:Edward Johnston

message: Removed the following which should not have been included as a direct quote  
from http://adactio.com/journal/display.php/20041215003521.xml
I did a little research and found out that the typeface was actually commissioned by Frank Pick way back in 1916. It's the work of one Edward Johnston in whose name a foundation has been formed. The typeface was slightly tweaked in 1980 but it has been more or less in constant use for almost 90 years.
The collaboration of Pick and Johnston must have been a match made in heaven. They also gave us the superb London Underground roundel.
--Henrygb 23:02, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A very interesting hour-long BBC documentary on sans serif designs of Edward Johnston and Eric Gill for London Transport by Mark Ovenden might be of interest / use for this page: available for a month on iPlayer
::Is only available for people living in the UK... J.T.W.A.Cornelisse (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC documentary on sans serif designs of Edward Johnston and Eric Gill 
Talk:Paul Walker

message: Section "Personal Life", paragraph 4:
Change "A car enthusiast, Walker competed in the"... to "As car enthusiast, Walker competed in the"... . Bodeneinheit (talk) 21:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Current is grammatically correct. Proposed text is not. As a car enthusiast might work but current wording is better  Cannolis (talk) 21:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 February 2023 

message: Please add the age of Paul Walker (33) and Jasmine Pilchard-Gosnell (16) when they first started dating. https://www.thethings.com/fans-are-deeply-uncomfortable-about-paul-walkers-relationship-with-jasmine-pilchardgosnell-heres-why/ DankMr.Jones (talk) 00:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Callmemirela 🍁 03:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2023 

message: {{subst:trim|1=
 
His younger brother Caleb is not mentioned in the siblings section
: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cocobb8 (💬 talk to me! • ✏️ my contributions) 21:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 June 2023 

message: idk pls put i need for a project  192.157.40.89 (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  hobbies
Talk:Adolph Alexander Weinman

message: Unfortunately, all the sculpture shown on the "First Bank" link here is by Corrado Parducci.  AA Weinman did do some work on this building, but it is not shown here.  Perhaps I'll post some of it.  Carptrash 23:20, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I feel you should tell a at least a little about Weinman's work on the pedestal of the statue at the Jefferson Memorial.99.161.86.167 (talk) 22:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jefferson Memorial 
Talk:George Watson (umpire)

message: Do you reckon this George Watson might be the same George Watson described in this article? It places him in Australia, around these dates, and having just retired from "The Advertiser" in 1908, so it's certainly possible - but on the other hand, it's not an unusual name. A google search didn't shed much light. Thoughts? -- All the best, Nickj (t) 23:22, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:20 March 2003 anti-war protest

message: This is the result of an internet trawl from the BBC. Cross stuff out as it is added.
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday Scotland (u.k) Anti-war protests target cities
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday U.K. War protests gather support
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday South England South sees anti-war protests
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday Oxford (u.k) City centre protest attracts 1,000
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday Lake District (u.k) Protesters hold up Celtic fans
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday Carmarthen (u.k) Chained war sit-in arrests
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday Global War draws global protests
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday Devon (u.k) Protest pupils expelled
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday Dunbartonshire (u.k) Council staff paid to attend rallies
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday Newcastle (u.k) Peace campaigners take to streets
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday U.K. School children march against war
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday Hereford (u.k) Anti-war protest attracts crowd
* 20 March, 2003 Thursday London (u.k) Anti-war protesters maintain pressure
--JK the unwise 18:17, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information to be added 

message: what the heading says.
: Well, 131.217.6.8, you're more than welcome to contribute with non-US information if you've got it.  Schuminweb 04:54, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  too much focus on the US 

message: I wonder if the use of the term 'Day X' for the day the war started is at all related to the millitary use of the term 'X Day' for the day a War starts or if it is just 
coincidence?--JK the unwise 11:42, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Day X
Talk:Certificate

message: The distinctions among the various usages for Certificate seem to be well presented here. The typical disambig page provides less information than some of the subtle distinctions explained within this article.  I am removing the Template:Split from this article and would encourage some discussion on this point. --hydnjo talk 23:29, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not so good if I want to directly wikilink to a computer certificate. It really should be split, or if you are game make it an umbrella article and use  to link to the correct article. I do think it would be better as a disambig page though. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:13, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: How would you propose the article be split? A disambiguation page has value, but I am less certain that creating a half dozen stubs is an improvement. GreggHilferding 04:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the best way to address this is to create a disambiguation page with a simple general definition that allows users to choose between Certificate (cryptography) and Certificate (academic), as these are the major disparate topics here (perhaps also Certificate of Deposit, Security certificate, etc).  Then, assemble a general introduction and an extended subsection on the variations of academic certificates similar to the layout of diploma (the various Postgraduate Certificate pages might also be merged with this section, but that's a bit of a different question).  Or, if the article is expanded enough to warrant it, like the layout of masters degree.  Care should also be taken not to overlap with certification--66.253.174.65 09:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I think that this page is too short to be split into a disambiguation.  Anyone searching for a more specific context of this topic can find it here just as easily as if they had to search and find using a disambiguation page. Scottydude 02:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

text: However it is done, I agree with a split. Bearian (talk) 15:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving this Article to a Disambiguation

message: Looooooong List of individual certificates - that have articles - if anyone can be bothered to make one. Perhaps in "Certificate (disambiguation)" article. Perhaps own article. Perhaps don't bother just name the main ones in the "Certificate (disambiguation)" article.
Sorry for lacking the ability to explain things quickly and simply
Carlwev 22:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we could do a disambig page. Eric Wester 23:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Certificates

message: I have changed this to a disamb page, and redirected Certificate (disambiguation) to here. It was a fairly quick edit, so it will benefit from someone going through and updating it. SilkTork *YES! 11:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't forget to WP:FIXDABLINKS now.  --R'n'B (call me Russ) 11:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed to disamb
Talk:Batman serials

message: What title are we going with for the first serial?  The title as it appears on-screen is clearly "Batman", as can be seen here: .  Posters, however, usually call it "The Batman".  The IMDb uses "The Batman", even though that goes against their own rules.  I'm planning on splitting this article into individual ones, so I'd like to know what I should go with, either Batman (serial) or The Batman (serial). Rhindle The Red 17:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Batman' or 'The Batman'?

message: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment should release both serials on Blu-ray. Stein256 (talk) 02:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blu-ray
Talk:Claude Eatherly

message: I don't know how to fix the page, but the big block quote starting "Whilst in no sense" is from the Anders/Eartherly book, page 6.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.182.56.12 (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

message: 211.50.61.226: I think there may be some good information in the changes you made that could be incorporated into the article if done properly.  I reverted your changes because they seem designed to advance a thesis (that Eatherly's post-bombing remorse and pre-bombing wartime activity were exaggerated) but relies mostly on third-person allegations rather than cited facts, and furthermore you deleted material that contradicts your preferred interpretation, including Eartherly's own written testimony.
Your section that reads:
:"However, famed author William Bradford Huie wrote an expose of the case called The Hiroshima Pilot. He pointed out Eartherly's was no different then the experience of many other men in the war. He said Eatherly actually saw very little combat. Huie's book made it clear Eatherly was but a small time thief and criminal who merely used Hiroshima as an excuse."
would be a useful addition to this article if made as an addition (not replacement) of the material already there, and if it described more of the factual information that Huie used to draw his conclusions.  Perhaps you could quote directly from Huie's book and also describe what makes Huie "famed" as an authority on this subject. -Moorlock 23:35, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have tagged this article for problems with the named references and for lack of inline citations. The references seem to be in the "Further reading' section and few if any have complete publication data, i.e. name of publisher, date of publication, year, ISBN. There are very few inline citations and those that are there do not include page numbers. Some of the sources listed appear to be original research or self published, but it is hard to tell because of a lack of publication information. Cuprum17 (talk) 18:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing and citation issues 
Talk:North Bethesda, Maryland

message: Every year or two, someone suggests edits along the lines of "There is no such thing as North Bethesda.  It's a false name for the southern part of Rockville or Kensington."  Generally, the comments relate to conceptions of geographical prestige.  Whatever your views on North Bethesda as a concept, I'd like to suggest that we keep this article -- like others on Wikipedia -- as a description of the Census-Designated Place (CDP) "North Bethesda."  
If editors re-define the boundaries of Bethesda, Rockville, and North Bethesda in a way that is inconsistent with their CDPs, they are likely to create a geographical gap on Wikipedia.  This is because the area in the North Bethesda CDP below the spurs of 270 (that is, the area with Lockheed-Martin, Marriott and Walter Johnson HS) is generally considered to be Bethesda proper.  Since that area is not significantly covered in the Bethesda article, and in fact is outside the Bethesda CDP, it needs to be covered somewhere.  Covering it here, in the CDP, is most consistent with Wikipedia's general approach.  The issue of what North Bethesda is is handled neutrally and appropriately in the "Zip Codes" section of the North Bethesda article, which notes that the southern part of the CDP is 20814 and 20817, and generally considered Bethesda.  It also explains how the USPS handles the area.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.162.231 (talk) 15:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bethesda, North Bethesda, and Rockville

message: I've edited the list to change "Garrett Park" to "Garrett Park Estates."  Garrett Park proper is an incorporated town and is therefore not part of the North Bethesda (or any other) CDP.  Garrett Park Estates, however, is unincorporated and is part of the North Bethesda CDP.  Doctor Whom 23:50, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Neighborhoods in North Bethesda

message: According to the map I am looking at, Twinbrook metro station seems to lie exactly on the border between Rockville and North Bethesda.  In any case, it is obviously the station of choice for residents at the northern end of the place. nadav 09:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twinbrook Metro
Talk:Boston cream pie

message: 2001?  I know for a fact the Boston Cream Pie has to be older than that, because they were around when I was a kid.  Also, who is this Mr. King?Bjones
:The part about 2001 and the King Family appears to have been vandalism by an anonymous user. See . I will attempt to revert this update. --Big_Iron 20:12, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalismk

message: I think there should definitely be a picture of this. Why hasn't anyone done it yet? ForestAngel 21:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Is this variation found widely distributed outside of Massachusetts? If not, why not? For example, Key lime pie might be the official pie of the state of Florida, but it's found throughout the United States and possibly the world.  Why might this be true for Key lime pie but not Boston cream pie? Viriditas (talk) 11:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution?

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Chocolate pie and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 10#Chocolate pie until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 16:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chocolate pie" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Does this need a fuller description? It seems to be written assuming the reader already knows what it is, and mainly focuses on the history and variations. Surely better to focus on what it actually is? Gymnophoria (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: I propose merging Boston cream doughnut into Boston cream pie. I think the content in the Boston cream pie page can easily be explained in the Variations section of the Boston cream pie page, and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in the Boston cream pie article. BaduFerreira (talk) 18:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a good idea. Maybe the article itself could just be called "Boston Cream" and have the pie and Donut have their own section. BlackBeauty42! (talk) 18:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Agree, there are lots of varieties of donuts that don't need their own articles. Covering this in the main Boston cream pie page makes sense. Reywas92Talk 15:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I Agree With both of you because having two articles is sparking confusion. HI PEOPLE8888 (talk) 22:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Texans for a Republican Majority

message: Most of the story can be read (for instance) here:
AP message rebroadcast by CNN 
but AP messages are generally only available for two weeks, so this won't be a lasting reference. Tinus 00:08, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Combined TRMPAC and this article.  TRMPAC is now redirected to this article.Kgrr 17:25, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: TRMPAC

message: Need TRMPAC logo--can it be found? Badagnani 03:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:D cell (biology)

message: ... or endocrinologist or gastroenterologist with cell biology knowledge. Is the term "D cell" synonymous with "Delta cell"?  If yes, then I or the responder could merge the two articles.  I would recommend redirecting this page D cell (biology) to Delta cell as the main article title should avoid the need for disambiguation if possible.  Thanks. Courtland 00:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question for cell biologist
Talk:Geographic profiling

message: Yes, the two probably should be merged.  Geographic profiling was the original term used. --70.113.41.197
:The Geographical profiling article isn't quite an accurate description, nor the proper term.  I don't see anything useful in that article, to add and merge to this article.  As 70.113.41.197 says, Geographic profiling is the correct term. --Aude 03:11, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

message: :In re: 
The changes I made to this article ARE constructive.  I initiated the original article, however, someone added superfluous and inaccurate content which I have - unsuccessfully - tried to delete.  The commentary based on Holmes and Holmes book was not about the development of a geographic profile, but rather was Stea's (1969) list of elements in the perception of distance.  As written, this was section was confusing and extraneous to the Wikipedia article.
66.25.164.249 (talk) 04:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Use EDIT SUMMARIES! How are we supposed to know what your rationale is for deleting whole sections? If you don't explain your edits it just looks like vandalism and will be reverted. -- œ™ 10:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Section removal
Talk:No (kana)

message: Why don't you add a page for each of the thousands of kanji too?  --Interiot 00:52, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They all do have a page - in Wiktionary. So does の. --DannyWilde 01:02, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page is being updated with lots of information, but the "manyogana" stuff is just copied from the hiragana page. It is dishonest to try to stop an article being deleted by conning people into thinking it has some contents like this. --DannyWilde 07:30, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits to avoid deletion?

message: This part truly has me puzzled: "In China, especially in Taiwan, の can be used to mean multiple people, especially when applied to young girls."  Is the introduction of the kana to Chinese writing a relatively recent development?  I don't recall having seen such before.  --Tabor 21:52, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What it says is that people in Taiwan, especially young girls, like to use の instead of writing 的, which is the Chinese character that means the same thing (the possessive). They still pronounce it the Chinese way when speaking and this usage does not match Japanese grammar. I have no idea if this is accurate, but it was added by zh:User:Koika, who says he's from Taiwan. - Nat Krause 09:13, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese meaning of Japanese kana?

message: Since the votes for deletion ended, nothing has been done with any of the "kana" pages. --DannyWilde 11:44, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Future of these pages?

message: "No is usually translated in english 'THE' or 'AND'(*)"
Who put this nonsense in here?  Removed.  Sigil7 02:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crazy edits

message: Why link to $$ Nuthatch instead of open-source jisho or EDRG-related project
That external link was added by whom as an editor ??
142.162.21.1 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 11:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why link to $$ Nuthatch instead of open-source jisho or EDRG-related project 

message: I only saw nonsense here because wiktionary has incomplete entry for 乃.
That is more an issue than silliness here ...
142.162.21.1 (talk) 11:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  landed here from Google due to Wiktionary issue
Talk:Nevado de Toluca

message: I removed the etymology 'naked man', which is pretty improbable, and left a recognition that other etymologies have been proposed.
--Lavintzin 00:57, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-added it, because numerous independent sources in both English and Spanish give "naked man" as the meaning of Xinantécatl.  --Seattle Skier (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: I corrected the coordinates per Google Earth. The Wikipedia Icon shown in Google Earth for this volcano is incorrectly placed at N19° 22" 30.51" W100°14" 12.54" (57.7 Kms NW of the correct location)
Roberto.Ayon 22:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coords

message: There is a dicrepancy of 10m between the height of 4680m given on this page (and elsewhere) and that given in the Table_of_the_highest_major_summits_of_North_America which is 10m higher. (Ranked 17th)  Perhaps someone could try to resolve this?-— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Moyes (talk • contribs) 22:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: There is a dicrepancy of 10m between the height of 4680m given on this page (and elsewhere) and that given in the Table_of_the_highest_major_summits_of_North_America which is 10m higher. (Ranked 17th)  Perhaps someone could try to resolve this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parkywiki (talk • contribs) 22:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: Does not make any sense, because Sierra Negra at 4 580 metres < 4 645 metres... So it is not higher... --Wisdood (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  although by some measurements, [[Sierra Negra]] is slightly higher.
Talk:Garcinia madruno

message: It is related to garcinia but I'm new to this. how would the article and information on the specific fruit remain intact? There are many rheedia fruits but few of this quality but the taxonomy on the fruit is not worked out yet so everyone in exotic fruit circles refers to it as rheedia spp.
:If it's a synonym in that it's a subcategory of Garcinia (as opposed to an alternate name), then that seems like a valid argument for retaining it as a separate article.  I suspect that Rheedia would be the more appropriate location for the article, but I'm not an expert.  I work on rodents, I just caught this in the list of new articles.  I'll drop the merge note.  --Aranae 02:16, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Lemon Drop Mangosteen is *NOT* Garcinia madruno but Garcinia intermedia.
87.165.94.25 (talk) 16:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Association with botanical name
Talk:U.S. Route 175

message: This could use a better map. --NE2 18:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like an updated map was added this week. Shaggylawn65 (talk) 12:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Could someone straighten out my construction photos at the bottom.  Im sorry but my formatting skills are not up to par.. --[[Jameywiki (talk) 05:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Construction Photos