lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Putrajaya–Cyberjaya Expressway

message: What country is this in? Seems to be a critical point of information for an encyclopedia, doesn't it? --LeyteWolfer 04:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This highway ls located in Malaysia --Highway specialist in Malaysia 17:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where?
Talk:Camp Speicher

message: I don't doubt the MiG-25 involvement, but it's not referenced and there are some disputes in the initial reporting (see article on Scott Speicher).  I recommend changing the wording to reflect that he MIGHT have been shot down by this aircraft.--Bdmccray (talk) 22:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mig 25]] involvement 

message: * Islamic State attack on Iraqi police trainees kills 12, officials say ABC News (Australia) 4 Jnauary 2015 
220 of Borg 13:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source re 3 (?) Jan 2016 attack
Talk:Socks (disambiguation)

message: Hi, I'm not really adept at using Wikipedia, but I think that the game "SOCK 2" is neat enough to deserve its own article. It is constructed by Matthew Demers of the www.rpgamer.com website, and has a complete set of rules and regulations which the participants need to follow. I was hoping someone, somehow, could create an article about it.
Thanks!
- Leongeeste88 05:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-09-24/From the editor

message: Ral315, I found your follow-up comments to the survey interesting and informative.  As an experienced reviewer at Wikipedia:Editor review and a voter at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship, I know the names and general interests of hundreds of Wikipedians.  I keep a list of editor reviews I have done at User:Shalom/Editor review archive.
I would be willing to try "interviewing" individual editors as a weekly feature.  The basic idea would be to ask one or two standard questions plus one or two questions tailored to the specific editor for that week.  I don't know how interesting it might be to other readers, or if I'd really want to do it as anything more than a trial run, but I can give it a shot.  Please let me know if the Signpost would want to run such a feature.
The next step would be to make a list of editors who might be good interview subjects, and to establish a user subpage for conducting these discussions.  Please leave a note on my talk page because I almost never check my watchlist. Shalom Hello 15:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion for covering RFAs and individual editors
Talk:Tephrosia purpurea

message: It seems to me that the page should possibly be moved to have a title that is the same as the first word of the article.  This page would then redirect there, and would make this article more accessible. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 00:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good suggestion! I just moved it from Tephrosia purpurea to Auhuhu. If you've got any more suggestions, I'm pretty inexperienced, so I'll be happy to listen. Indeterminate 05:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:NC (flora), the article should be titled at the species name. --Rkitko (talk) 13:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible page move 

message: "cosmetic preparations" (pdf) = 404
--H3rmsn (talk) 11:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Link removed; external links shouldn't be linked in the article body anyway. Plantdrew (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken Link 
Talk:Grizzly Rage

message: Can anyone confirm what kind of vehicle the humans were in?  I saw 4x4 for in during one scene, and I thought I saw Land Rover as well.  But it also looked like a Jeep Cherokee? AnmaFinotera 04:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answer: the SUV is a Jeep 4x4 with Off Road markings.  I just did a still frame by frame during 3 different scenes; it was a Jeep in each.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.29.104.130 (talk) 03:20, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This question is over a year old. No point answering now. And please STOP ruining this article. Per our guidelines, the plot section is the complete plot. Wikipedia is not a spoiler free zone, period. We give the whole plot, with all major plot points. This section is called PLOT. Summary is for a teaser, and rarely used. You have been reported to the administrators for your continued vandalism. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vehicle 

message: A request has been made to determine if this article meets the B-class criteria. After looking the article over and making some changes, I believe it meets the criteria and have reassessed the article. I'd recommend further expansion before advancing to GA. If you have any questions, please let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:FILMS B-class assessment
Talk:The History of the Caucasian Albanians

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The History of the Country of Albania →  – It is the original and correct title of the book. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 11:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Armenia has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 15:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Azerbaijan has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 15:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Books has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 15:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: meaningless oppose, it isn't the correct title to begin with. Have you even read the article. - Kevo327 (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 March 2022
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of fictional restaurants

message: The history shows that some coments and !votes were apparently deleted from this AFD and should be restored, unless there was a valid policy-based reason for removing them. Edison 05:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The error was here and I restored them here. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lindelöf space

message: It would be cool if this article provided some examples of spaces that are and aren't Lindelöf. -76.22.99.215 06:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples?

message: The following set of sets is presented as a cover for Sorgenfrey plane S 
1. The set of all points (x, y) with x < y 
2. The set of all points (x, y) with x + 1 > y 
3. For each real x, the half-open rectangle [x, x + 2) × [−x, −x + 2) 
But the two first set already cover all plane. In fact, for any point (x,y), either x<y or y ≤ x, so we have, for any point (x,y),  x<y or y<x+1. 
I think you meant: 
1. The set of all points (x, y) with x < -y 
2. The set of all points (x, y) with x - 1 > -y 
3. For each real x, the half-open rectangle [x, x + 2) × [−x, −x + 2) 
Then, the rest of the text is OK.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.25.30.180 (talk) 02:31, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Products of Lindelöf Spaces

message: A search of the literature (google, mathse, mathoverflow, dan ma's topology blog, Willard, Engelking, etc) shows that the terminology hereditarily Lindelöf is much more common than strongly Lindelöf, both in the context of general topology and in the context of measure theory (see Bogachev's book for example).  Furthermore, hereditarily Lindelöf has unambiguous meaning, whereas strongly Lindelöf is sometimes used with a different meaning altogether (see https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-NOTE-ON-STRONGLY-LINDELO%CC%88F-SPACES-Ganster/04b50b66a69e898fb5fec820765244f07d9beddc for example).  For these reasons, I will flip the role of the two terms and make hereditarily Lindelöf the main accepted terminology.  PatrickR2 (talk) 21:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hereditarily Lindelöf versus strongly Lindelöf
Talk:Frankenstein (disambiguation)

message: Hey User:Martinevans123, who just reverted
* "Frankenstein", an upcoming opera by Mark Grey
with comment "the premier is 12 months away and the only source at the target page is Facebook?"
Here's the official page of the Opera:  https://www.lamonnaie.be/fr/program/836-frankenstein   
I don't have any Facebook link.  I'll boldly re-insert it with the link.  Feel free to discuss / rererevert it –Jérôme (talk) 09:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, Jérôme. We don't use any external links here, of course, just internal links to a target article if the subject itself has none of its own. I don't wish to edit war, but I think you're engaging in WP:CRYSTAL. I think even inclusion at the Mark Grey article is debatable. It simply doesn't exist. Regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  No worries, feel free to change both pages.  Or maybe, change the Mark Grey page accordingly.  Or maybe, put the corresponding text in HTML comments, so they can be re-included later. Cheers –Jérôme (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  As I said, I think that it might reasonably appear at the Mark Grey article, if the source was good enough (but that article is not on my watchlist), but that it should not appear here as it does not exist. I'd welcome other opinions. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:55, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming Opera 

message: An Indian politician.
הראש (talk) 13:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also Frankenstein Momin 

message: The term Frankenstein might refer to something that is made of different parts of different other things, similarly to the monster 
 הראש (talk) 19:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slang
Talk:Afghan National Army Commando Corps

message: this page is extremely similar in content to the ANA Special Operations Command, I wonder if the two organizations were either the same org, or perhaps one was a portion of the other, like for example one is an umbrella org and the other is a sub org. can anybody check on that? Philipbrochard (talk) 03:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we merge this page?
Talk:George Varghese

message: what makes this guy notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.32.218 (talk • contribs) 
:Good question.  Probably significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, but since there are no citations in evidence of that, we won't know until someone adds them.  I added a notability tag to encourage a knowledgeable editor to do so.  Note that his own writing don't count as independent, so don't contribute as evidence of notability. Dicklyon 07:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Luftwaffe order of battle August 1940

message: I have made some corrections, and I have added 1 Stab Gruppe. But before I add more, I thought perhaps I should clear it with everyone. Dapi89 (talk) 12:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 

message: I have massacred Bungay et al's information here, de Zeng is a much better resource, and Bungay has made allot of mistakes. de Zeng's information is obviously more detailed (and says where there isn't information, or records are light), I think the rest are also out of their depth on that one. de Zeng and his co-authors have researched primary sources and official histories. Dapi89 (talk) 18:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  COs of the various Kampfgeschwader/gruppen

message: .......there seems to be two! Dapi89 (talk) 11:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lehrgeschwader 2

message: I was sort of looking for a count of German aircraft by type. (250 JU-%2 and so on.) Further, while I am complaining, I would really like such a list for the 1939 Campaign. Many thanks, Paul, in Saudi (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we get a count?
Talk:Broken English

message: I propose to merge Engrish into Broken English. I think that the content in the Engrish article can easily be explained in the context of Broken English, and the Broken English article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Engrish will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. —Yours sincerely, Soumyabrata (contributions • subpages) 14:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: * I agree with you, that seems like the best solution. PrussianOwl (talk) 05:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: That's not how the term is actually used. GeorgeTSLC (talk) 05:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Article not say that. It says some cases intentional, but other like pidgin not.--KasiaNL (talk) 05:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intentionally broken only?
Talk:Lake Oswego/Archive 1

message: A lot of people affectionately call Lake Oswego "Lake No Negro" 
Because of its rich affluent middle and upper class there are virtually no black people living up there at all.
=== Lake Big... ===
The nickname "Lake Big-Ego" is also quite popular, but I'm not sure as to how relevant these little factoids are to the big article... --Gregoe86 05:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake no... 

message: The nickname "Lake Big-Ego" is also quite popular, but I'm not sure as to how relevant these little factoids are to the big article... --Gregoe86 05:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake Big... 

message: What's the story on that most recent edit about a "former Lake Oswego resident named Colin"? Is this a joke thing or an anecdote that I'm not aware of...?  --Gregoe86 05:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colin? 

message: I checked the census data on Lake Oswego.  (See page 58 of http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/phc-1-39.pdf ).  Whites make up 89.7% of LO, not 97.13%.  We should probably change that, and recalculate the percentages for the other races with the census data.  Also, where did we get the demographics data on the article right now?  Seems odd to have made mistakes on all of those.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.201.185 (talk) 06:19, August 29, 2007 (UTC) 
::Good catch. The change was made by a vandal a while back and it never got caught. Here's the diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lake_Oswego%2C_Oregon&diff=41864361&oldid=37086301
::I updated the data from here: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/SAFFFacts?_event=Search&geo_id=&_geoContext=&_street=&_county=Lake+Oswego&_cityTown=Lake+Oswego&_state=04000US41&_zip=&_lang=en&_sse=on&pctxt=fph&pgsl=010&show_2003_tab=&redirect=Y
::The data seems to be the same as was originally entered prior to the vandalism, but has been rounded to the nearest tenth rather than hundredth. --Sprkee 17:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there's anything particularly notable about this other than the reputation and the racist nickname. It's actually less white than the rest of Oregon (91% vs. 93%), slightly whiter than some adjacent cities (Tigard, Tualatin), less white than some (West Linn), but considerably whiter than Portland as a whole (91% vs. 77%)--though some parts of Portland would have similar demographics. I'd say not notable. --Sprkee 18:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake Oswego Demographics
Talk:Brandon Mebane

message: You forgot that Mebane has 3 children (1 deceased). Mahailey, Makai and Makenna. Makenna died from Patau syndrome.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:BD39:6400:B1AD:1D99:9FB:6965 (talk) 00:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:Musa Hassan

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 18:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I added the source for his family background, but the original article is only available for paid subscribers. Only the preview is available here 
http://www.nib.com.my./archives/page/view/40185945?pos=1&hide_header=1&resultset=nstpec%3Awww/cross-search/search.php%3A_1317604912%3Aresultset
The introduction paragraph is still legible and good enough to be used a source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.48.207.47 (talk) 02:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 
Talk:Leptospira

message: rubbish  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.23.239.148 (talk) 15:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article states:
:QUOTE: Leptospira, together with the genera Leptonema and Turneria, is a member of the family Leptospiraceae.
The Leptonema link goes to a page about a genus of ants, and the Turneria link goes to a page about a genus of flowering plants.
Clearly an error.
Drgao (talk) 23:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  So bacteria are the same as ants and flowers 
Talk:Kel Knight

message: Is Kel Knight a cultural phenomenon? Is he the first male Australian character who is openly, willingly in touch with his feminine side? Though his preoccupations are often laughable, I object to the comment in the wiki that he is effeminate - he's hardly just off a Sydney Mardi Gras float. (Ok, so he shagged sailors when he was in the navy, but that seems to have been just a phase!) His understanding of women, by Kath's admission, appears to have made him a great heterosexual lover. And Glenn Robbins plays him brilliantly. Frankieparley 07:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kel Knight: Cultural Phenomenon?
Talk:Erik Meyer

message: Removed Lulay from the 2009 3rd string QB competition.  He signed with the BC Lions of the CFL.  Anyone have an actual source for the 2009 hire of Meyer to the Seahawks?  Nothing on their site since 2007. [mercator079|mercator079] June 4 2009 0008 GMT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.1.114 (talk) 00:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He never signed. He might have been invited to camp or something. But he never was on the roster. reverted to last good version. RF23 (talk) 05:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:I Ketut Soki

message: I have contested deletion, but User:80.110.43.152 has reinstated the WP:PROD template twice, despite my message at User talk:80.110.43.152 pointing out that reinstating the template is against policy. I have no wish to get into an edit war over the template, but could the reviewing admin please note that deletion has been contested. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:PROD]] deletion
Talk:Woodinville Subdivision

message: Most of the information throughout the article was current in 2007.  We need dates.  Of note are the following bits:
* Branch of line that cuts through Kirkland/Totem Lake and along the east edge of Kingsgate has been converted to a trail, it is now completely defunct
* Tense of article is written as if the line is still in use
* Redmond branch (along Willows Road NE) is mostly dismantled
In addition, what's the update on the rails-to-trails kerfuffle down in Bellevue?
--Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 00:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: We need to update this
Talk:Saint Peter's Abbey on the Madron

message: The lemma is wrong. The medieval sources do not mention any promotion of the small monastery to the rank of an abbey. Its leaders always went by the title of provosts (Probst/Propst in German), not abbots. So, we should speak of a monastery, not of an abbey. Accordingly, I believe the article should be moved.
In the words of Sebastian Dachauer (1840, p. 393, for the full title see the German article): 
: „Gleich von dem Tode Siboto’s an wollte ungeachtet so mancher Schenkungen das Kloster am Madron dennoch nicht in größern Flor kommen; es wurde nie zur abteilichen Würde erhoben; Pröbste hießen seine Vorstände (...)“ 
More recent publications do not tell us otherwise either (e.g. Meier/Schmitt 2001, p. 8). -- Martinus KE (talk) 02:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an abbey
Talk:Chinguetti

message: What is the population? -- Beland (talk) 16:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Federalism (United States)

message: Seem to both be about historical developments in US federalism. MH au 08:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Federalism in the United States appears to be the preferred title, but was created in early 2007, most likey by an editor unaware of this page's existance (Meaning it doesn't look like a content dispute fork). I recomend merging Federalism in the United States here, as this page has a longer edit history, then moving this page to Federalism in the United States. - BillCJ 23:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense to me.  Merging and redirecting the two to the most logical title seems ideal. matt91486 04:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I've done many merges before, but I'm not that familiar with the particulars here to do it quickly. I can help with the copy editing afterward if someone would like to take a stab at the merger itself, that would be good. If no one does so in the next few days, I'll give it a try. - BillCJ 05:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

text: YES, this totally needs to be merged. Theres no reason not to! Never merged before, so someone else has to do it. - EddieC 06:04, 04 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I can do the copy editing for you. If you have any questions about how to do it, just ask here, or on my talk page. - BillCJ 16:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's finished. Thanks again for copy editing. Eternalmonkey 18:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bishop of Salisbury

message: The page states that Lorenzo Campeggio was 'Appointed Administrator of Salisbury. Deprived by Act of Parliament on the grounds of non-residence' and that he held office from 1524 to 1534.  However, it appears that the Vatican continued to recognize him as Administrator until (or until very close to) his death on 25 July 1539.  The Calendar of State Papers for 31 Henry VIII no 1308 records that on 23 July 1539 'His Holiness gave the administration of the church of Salisbury in England to Gaspar card. Contarini'.  I therefore propose to change the page to read that Campeggio continued to be recognized as Administrator by the Vatican until July 1539. Alekksandr (talk) 18:22, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The Reformation

message: * A Description of that Admirable Structure, the Cathedral Church of Salisbury. With the Chapels, Monuments, Grave-Stones, and their Inscriptions. To which is prefixed, An Account of Old Sarum. R. Baldwin (London), 1774.
* Jones, Wm. Henry Rich. Fasti Ecclesiæ Sarusberiensis: a History of the Cathedral Body at Sarum. (Salisbury), 1879.
 — LlywelynII 08:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion