lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Indian state legislative assembly elections

message: in order to get this better cleaned, we should clean this by year for each state/province. In that regard, the recent 2008 is quite active. When was Gujarat? Forgot now. either late 2007 or early 2008? Lihaas (talk) 02:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up second table regarding State Assembly elections (by state) and included year. I propose that the third heading State Assembly election results (by state) be deleted as it serves no purpose. There are no articles available and the state names in the above table are already linked to any such articles. ifesvr (talk) 19:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean up
Talk:Highgate School

message: Comment by 86.138.158.87 - removed from article text:
:Although some regularly claim on this page that it is 'prestigious', not 'fairly prestigious', I attended the school for 13 years and it really is nothing more than fairly prestigious.  Repeatedly calling it prestigious is why there is a complaint saying this page sounds too much like an advertisement.
MightyWarrior 20:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Repeatedly?  You mean 'once'!! --193.118.203.3 08:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prestigiousness 

message: As an Old Cholmelian, I note two more obvious omissions:
The first is that there is no mention of the school song, known simply as Carmen.
 Sursum corda, sursum voces,
 Una gaudeamus!
Are the first lines. This was often sung at ends of term. (The headmaster would hand out copies of the words, and then lead the singing. (This was in the 1960s and early 1970s ...))
The other notable omission is of the famous (or notorious - according to taste and attitude) Jewish quota.
Comments? Hair Commodore (talk) 17:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two more missing Elements 

message: Please only add alumni with verifiable online sources. Strictly speaking, all entries should include references. For example, in the wiki page for Special Boat Service, Roger Courtney, not Davis, is mentioned as its founder in 1940 (!?!)) So, the question is, did Old Cholmeleian Davis really found the SBS? Please add credible online references or this claim should be deleted.
I have to deleted Reginald Blomfield from the sub-list for alumni in the arts. All the sources I read  do not support that he was educated at Highgate. They cite Haileybury. The fact that he designed the school does not make him an Old Cholmeleian!!! --Abacchus1974 (talk) 22:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: False or unsourced entries in the Alumni list
Talk:Blikanasaurus

message: The 2020 proposal to merge Blikanasauridae here seems reasonable as the nomenclature doesn't seem to have modern use and is readily discussed in the context of Blikanasaurus. Klbrain (talk) 14:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 15:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:T. N. Seshan

message: The current article is Seshan worship;nothing else.He was a very controversial figure,and this article lacks even a single one of them.I am adding a POV tag.--Sahodaran 17:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that I wont be able to find time to set aside to contribute to the article doesnt mean that the article is not POV.The article is incomplete,and the facts that are present here and absent here are not just coincidential but  deliberate so as to give an article a definite POV,glorification of Seshan.Someone who is reading the article will get a feel that Seshan was such a great man,with so little criticism.This is a man with so much,so much criticism against him and his policies.I'll wait for your reply before adding the POV tag.Thanks.--Sahodaran 04:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Bonitasaura

message: Why doesn't the illustration show the keratinous zones? 2620:160:EB08:0:0:0:0:B (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

message: Currently the article states the "Bonitasaura measured 30 meters (100 feet) in length," but all of the resources that I could find (including both editions of The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs) gave a length of 30 or 33 feet. Also, the only size comparison of this dinosaur that we have gives a length of 9 meters. Is this a typo (30 meters instead of 30 feet) or is it an actual estimate? --Slate Weasel (talk) 13:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length Estimate
Talk:Borealosaurus

message: Cut and paste from the article:
"Borealosaurus might have appered in Prehistoric Park, but known as a titanosaur"
What evidence is there to suggest that this titanosaur was Borealosaurus (i.e. the context)? J. Spencer 13:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this assessment from a viewer's after-the-fact decision using the general time and place of the setting, or did someone actually say Borealosaurus? The difference is that the first case is original research, which is prohibited on Wikipedia, but the second is just a matter of plugging in a reference.  It could very well be Borealosaurus, but without them saying so, it could also just be a generic titanosaur, or even an unnamed titanosaur from the same area that the show's producers knew about (it's not uncommon to have multiple genera of sauropods in a formation). J. Spencer 15:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

text: You can't use Wikipedia to cite Wikipedia; also, it appears that you (personally) added that information. J. Spencer 19:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In media
Talk:Bothriospondylus

message: The holotype of Bothriospondylus madagascariensis is NHMUK R2598 with the referred specimens being NHMUK R2596, NHMUK R2597, NHMUK R2599-R2615, NHMUK R16588, and NHMUK R16589 (Mannion 2010). A specimen from Madagascar referred to Bothriospondylus madagscariensis by Thevenin (1907) represents an indeterminate eusauropod, as does a specimen (MNHN MAJ 289) assigned by Lavocat (1955) to Bothriospondylus. (Lang and Goussard do not comment on the relationship of MNHN MAJ 289 to the type material of Bothriospondylus madagascariensis, so comparison between those specimens is essential.) Mannion (2010) has refrained from erecting a new genus for B. madagscariensis because of uncertainties surrounding the association of the type and referred specimens. Nonetheless, it is clear that B. madagascariensis is not the same taxon as Lapparentosaurus and instead represents a derived non-neosauropod eusauropod. Any attempt to erect a new name for B. madagscariensis must await a re-appraisal of the non-neosauropod Malagasy sauropods in a phylogenetic context.
Marmarospondylus needs a separate page because the type horizon for Marmarospondylus robustus (Forest Marble Formation) is late Bathonian whereas the type horizon for Bothriospondylus suffosus (Kimmeridge Clay) is early Kimmeridgian (Cope et. al. 1980). Therefore, even though Marmarospondylus is dubious, there are no grounds for it being congeneric with Bothriospondylus.
The "French Bothriospondylus" specimen described by Lapparent (1943) is a distinct taxon of brachiosaurid (Mannion 2010).
COPE, J. C. W., DUFF, K. L., PARSONS, C. F., TORRENS, H. S., WIMBLEDON, W. A. and WRIGHT, J. K. 1980. A correlation of Jurassic rocks in the British Isles. Part 2, Middle and Upper Jurassic. Geological Society of London Special Report, 15, 1–109.
LAVOCAT, R. 1955. Sur un membre ante´rieur du dinosaurien sauropode Bothriospondylus Owen, recueilli a` Madagascar. Comptes Rendus de l’Acade´mie des Sciences de Paris, 240, 1795–1796.
THEVENIN, A. 1907. Pale´ontologie de Madagascar. Annales de Pale´ontologie, 2, 121–136. 68.4.61.168 (talk) 00:23, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bothriospondylus madagascariensis type; Marmarospondylus
Talk:Brachyceratops

message: The way I read the new PLOS article is that only one of the juvenile specimens previously referred to Brachyceratops can safely be referred to Rubeosaurus, and it is not the holotype, USNM 7951, which figured in this article previously. About the holotype: 
"As thoroughly explicated by Sampson et al. [29], the holotype (USNM 7951) and other specimens from the type quarry of Brachyceratops are juvenile centrosaurines. USNM 7951 exhibits an unfused nasal horncore, a feature concordant with juvenile status (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, the two well preserved partial parietals from the Brachyceratops quarry (USNM 7951 and 7950; Fig. 3B, C) are missing most of their caudal bars and do not display features that could be classified as incipient versions of the diagnostic epiparietal morphologies in the frills of adult Rubeosaurus, Einiosaurus, or Achelousaurus. Finally, no elements from the Brachyceratops quarry exhibit autapomorphies or a unique combination of characters by which the taxon could be diagnosed. Brachyceratops montanensis should therefore be considered a nomen dubium."
It appears that the only specimen of Brachyceratops that has been referred to Rubeosaurus in that paper is USNM 14765. Another specimen, MOR 492, is also referred to Rubeosaurus, but it does not seem to ever have been included in Brachyceratops. FunkMonk (talk) 18:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the specimens from the 1913 quarry worked by Strayrer were not referred to Rubeosaurus. Of course, had they been referred that would have made Rubeosaurus a junior synonym, so in either case the pictures have their rightful place here ;o). I'll reinsert them, putting the painting in the taxobox because the skeleton picture is not clear enough, I think, to give the reader the necessary Gestalt imprint.--MWAK (talk) 06:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specimens
Talk:Babulal Gaur

message: Please feel free to add them back into the article after adding reliable source. --DBigXrayᗙ 10:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced claims in need of reliable source 

message: Gaur received a number of awards for significant works in social and public life. In 1991, Gaur was conferred title of Varshshri in an opinion poll conducted by Nai Duniya, Bhopal (names of 8 persons including Arjun Singh and Madav Rao Scindia were also in contention).
--------
 Hi, it seems most of these unsourced content above are directly copied from this link. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards

message: Regarding this edit. All sources seem primary government sources but are correct, except for the mention of Mr. Astana which is not sourced. What to do? revert it citing secondary reliable sources or keep it removing the unsourced part only? Please suggest. -  Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the sourced content and added Cn tags. A revert is not done when multiple valid edits will be removed. So I went ahead ad added a tag. if no source provided the mention on Astana will be removed. I will welcome the new user now. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've copyedited a little and merged the references. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New edits at Babulal Gaur
Talk:Rajiv Pratap Rudy

message: and  were both sockpuppets who were blocked. The most of the changes in the page are by these two accounts including BLP violation. Heba Aisha (talk) 23:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pov issues and sockpuppet activities
Talk:Bradycneme

message: i wonder did they find any diagnostic traits???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.91.231.10 (talk) 07:34, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there any paper saying bradycneme is dubious?
Talk:Gupta (king)

message: As several modern historians have pointed out, the word Śri is an honorific, not part of the king's name. For example, the Allahabad Pillar inscription names Samudragupta's ancestors as Śri Gupta, Śri Ghatotkacha, and Śri Chandragupta. As such, this article should be moved to Gupta. utcursch | talk 15:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Breviceratops

message: AFAIK, this taxon is now considered synonymous with Bagaceratops (by everybody now? I don't know). Thus, vote on whether redirect or just add to this page explaining controversy and plenty of links to Bagaceratops Cas Liber 09:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a pretty late response, but yeah, it should be merged. Wasn't Gobiceratops maybe a synonym too? FunkMonk (talk) 11:33, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus on these things can shift pretty quickly. Will try to get an idea from the books. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:05, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

text: The Bagaceratops article says: "Juvenile remains, initially tentatively named Protoceratops kozlowskii, and then renamed Breviceratops kozlowskii by Kurzanov in 1990 are now felt to be juvenile Bagaceratops. Sereno (2000) explained this by extrapolating that the juvenile Breviceratops would grow into a mature Bagaceratops." FunkMonk (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, sounds good enough for a merge for me. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Googled a bit and found this: http://dml.cmnh.org/2003Sep/msg00382.html Seems like it is still a bit problematic, but it should certainly be mentioned in the affected articles, problem is I can't find the full citation for Sereno 2000... FunkMonk (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Synonymy with ''Bagaceratops''
Talk:Blackshirts (India)

message: It is not at all clear from what little information has been posted on this group that they actually are atheistic. Evidence of this assertion is very much needed. Otherwise, I have little faith that the term "atheist" in this article is anything more than a smear on either this group or atheists in general.Koshki (talk) 07:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  atheism 
Talk:Vairamuthu

message: What are the movies for which he got national awardDoctor Bruno 10:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of  movies

message: == Name of this page is not good change the name as vairamuthu.
Change the name of the person Aravind2831 (talk) 09:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written by Viagramuthu 

message: Viagra Muthu 51.68.152.226 (talk) 02:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Danski454 (talk) 10:35, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2018 

message: This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy. So, do not add premature status or news, especially, accusations that not proved. --AntanO 01:07, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP 

message: Remove this in controversy 
"To date, 17+ women have raised allegations of Sexual Harassment against Vairamuthu (Both Anonymous and Named Allegations)."
It is a defamation. It is added without any references by User:Ksainarayanan. 106.197.79.120 (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Actualcpscm (talk) 08:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2023
Talk:Trade Union Coordination Centre

message: So... In the clean-up and expansion of the article, I came across the split 2015-2016 - see https://forwardbloc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Circular-18.pdf , http://presscouncil.nic.in/WriteReadData/Pdf/AP.pdf , https://www.facebook.com/ForwardBloc/posts/mr-sp-tiwari-general-secretary-tucc-central-committee-has-been-suspended-from-th/1002424496446910/ , etc, etc.. Both groups remain active, claiming to be the genuine TUCC. The Shivashankar-led group is the one recognized by Forward Bloc, the Tiwari-led group linked to the Samajwadi Forward Bloc. Not sure what to make of the article, if split in two or not. --Soman (talk) 15:11, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2015-2016 split
Talk:Indian Film and TV Producers Council

message: Is this a trade union? Looking at the members directory for the AMPTPP I get the distict feeling this is an industry association not a trade union.--Bookandcoffee 20:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely an industry association. I've changed the article to match. Open question: what relationship does this have to the Indian Motion Picture Producers’ Association? -- Impsswoon (talk) 13:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Trade union?
Talk:Brigham McCown

message: This page was started in 2006, written by staffers and, as the edit history shows, narrowly escaped deletion due to WP :AUTO and notability issues twice or more.
	 	
As of 5/2014, 8 years later, the article is still a mess. It is highly uninformative. Missing layout, sloppy and largely references and notability treated casually, it reads like a resume. The external links section is unacceptable. If this is not cleaned up speedily, I will tag for deletion.--Wuerzele (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  As of 5/2014, the page is still a mess 

message: Agree this article should be deleted.  It is messy, unsupported, and appears to be inconsistent with policy regarding autobiographies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandiego42 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 8/6/14

message: Note: all refs are external links.  was there a paid editor involved maybe? Honi soit qui mal y pense. --Wuerzele (talk) 07:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  fixed layout, tagged with citation needs 
Talk:Futabasaurus

message: When was the futabasaurus discovered?  The reason I ask is that Doraemon volume 10 (published 1976) mentions a plesiosaur called futaba-suzuki-ryuu.
「いや、おそれいった！これは首長竜の一種でフタバスズキリュウだ！白亜紀の日本近海に住んでいたんだ」(Doraemon, page 175)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.236.147 (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery
Talk:Trade unions in India

message: I think we should move this to Trade unions in India, in line with the names from Wikipedia:WikiProject Organized Labour/list of Trade unions in country articles, and then build on it from there.--Bookandcoffee 17:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: The article says that the unions are "affiliated" to some party or the other. This is completely incorrect as there is no affiliation of any trade union in india with any party, although most trade unions are associated with or linked to some party. This is an important distinction. --ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 10:58, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy
Talk:All India Central Council of Trade Unions

message: ===Affiliated Unions===
*All India Agrarian Labourers Association
*All India Construction Workers Federation
*Bengal Chatkal Mazdoor Federation
*Bunkar Mahasabha
*Rajasthan Nirman Mazdoor Sangathan
*Tamil Nadu Democratic Construction Labour Union
*Indo Japan Air Services Staff Union
*All India General Kamgar Union
*Building Workers Union
*DMRC CWU
*DTC Unity Centre
*Mahila Kamgar Union
*Khet Mazdoor Sabha
I have removed the unsourced list above from the article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced list 

message: *All India Agrarian Labourers Association
*All India Construction Workers Federation
*Bengal Chatkal Mazdoor Federation
*Bunkar Mahasabha
*Rajasthan Nirman Mazdoor Sangathan
*Tamil Nadu Democratic Construction Labour Union
*Indo Japan Air Services Staff Union
*All India General Kamgar Union
*Building Workers Union
*DMRC CWU
*DTC Unity Centre
*Mahila Kamgar Union
*Khet Mazdoor Sabha
I have removed the unsourced list above from the article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Affiliated Unions
Talk:All India Federation of Trade Unions

message: :Image:Aiftu.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Aiftu.PNG
Talk:Futalongkosaurus

message: Looks like this one's about to go "live", as Futalognkosaurus dukei. J. Spencer 01:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why is the lemma title "Futalongkosaurus"? :o)--MWAK 07:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Newsfield

message: Has anyone got any writing skills to make this article a bit more upbeat?! I was a big fan back in the Crash and Zzap days - maybe the article should concentrate on those, and shorten the sections on the less successful (and less notable) subsequent magazines. Pelago 21:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upbeat 

message: I thought LM stood for "Lively Magazine". Didn't that appear on some of it's covers?
:That rings a bell - however, I don't recall it appearing on the covers, though I don't have any of the magazines any longer. Lloyd Mangram's Leisure Monthly was one of the 'official explanations' used internally at Newsfield. Barnabypage 13:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  LM
Talk:City of Blue Mountains

message: Google search: "city of blue mountains" site:bmcc.nsw.gov.au - 551 hits
Google search: "city of the blu
The city council page refers to it as "City of Blue Mountains". --Milton 19:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: City name

message: Deputy Mayor did end up standing down, said it was for family reasons. New deputy Mayor is Chris Van DerKlay as if this week. News article: 
http://www.bluemountainsgazette.com.au/story/2562395/change-at-top-as-deputy-mayor-relinquishes-role/?cs=1180The current deputy mayor is under investigation for his actions at Winmalee High School where he left for a sexual relationship with a student. It's certainly a significant event and the first time a sitting Councillor is likely to be removed from Council under such circumstances.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.34.219 (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Deputy Mayor
Talk:Ruth St. Denis

message: The date in Find-A-Grave is different. Lincher 21:16, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: To add to the lead of this article: how to pronounce "St. Denis." 173.88.241.33 (talk) 15:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: Can St. Denis's deep interest in Indian dance be mentioned in this article? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 03:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Interest in Indian dance
Talk:Warren T. McCray

message: This article needs a photo. His official portrait was made in 1927, so i can't submit it using the before 1923 option. I don't see though how anyone would care if we used the portrait of a dead governor. But I am not sure how to go about uploading it without lying to the upload wizard. If anyone could help it would be appreciated! :) Thanks  Charles Edward 13:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Canonical decomposition

message: Can anyone define this or canonical equivalence without using the other term in the explanation? -Heartofgoldfish 21:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In reality the decompositions are just defined as properties of the individual characters, as described in a big table in a text file on Unicode.org --66.251.26.56 21:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)