Talk:Giant petrel

message: I'm not sure if a split is needed, the two species do not vary a great deal in any aspect of their biology that I am aware of. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 00:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As separate species, they are definitely notable separately, even if there is little biological difference. Frickeg (talk) 02:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No one is questioning the notability of the two species. By the way the circumstances do not call for a split, instead two new articles would have to be created but this one would have to remain as the article for the genus Macronectes. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 21:14, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this should be split. They're two different species. ;) --HoopoeBaijiKite 21:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created the separate articles for the species, like I said, this article should remain as it covers the genus. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 23:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course. My knowledge of the exact protocol of splits, etc, is not fantastic; I was never suggesting this article become a disambiguation page. Frickeg (talk) 02:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  split 

message: I threw a  because none of my literature has this, I also threw in a few , and a general request for more inline citations. I have referenced all that I can. most especially for the quote. speednat (talk) 21:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Working on the cleanup listing, and found this supporting evidence: short article from Emu (Australian journal). MeegsC | Talk 17:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks MeegsC speednat (talk) 18:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canniblism of Albtrosses 

message: I work until 5PM MST, I will attack the taxonomy section when I return speednat (talk) 17:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy Section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Giant petrel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050718182613/http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/DSE/nrenpa.nsf/LinkView/EADA0F1874AF9CF24A2567C1001020A388BBA5581CF9D859CA256BB300271BDB to http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/DSE/nrenpa.nsf/LinkView/EADA0F1874AF9CF24A2567C1001020A388BBA5581CF9D859CA256BB300271BDB
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060911130015/http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/DSE/nrenpa.nsf/LinkView/617768308BCB666E4A25684E00192281E7A24BB36FF60A144A256DEA00244294 to http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/DSE/nrenpa.nsf/LinkView/617768308BCB666E4A25684E00192281E7A24BB36FF60A144A256DEA00244294
*Added  tag to http://www.taxonomy.nl/Main/Classification/51499.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Giant petrel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720030417/http://www.heardisland.aq/nature/animals/fact_file_southern_giant_petrel.html to http://www.heardisland.aq/nature/animals/fact_file_southern_giant_petrel.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified