Talk:Dynamic Tower

message: I have reverted some of the changes made by  on 28 January 2008.  Theses changes dealt with the removal of "wind" and "prevailing winds."  The turbines in the tower will not be the conventional wind turbines.  These turbines will be between the floors.  The movement of the floors will spin the turbines; therefore providing energy for the tower itself.  Please see the sources provided for more information.  I also added "in the vicinity" to show that the tower will not just have an overabundance of energy, but will be exporting it.  I hope that made sense.  If you want to discuss the issue further, or disagree with the changes I made or what I wrote above, please feel free to respond.  Thank you.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 04:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The assertion that "the movement of the floors will spin the turbines" is incorrect.  The building's movement will be powered by the turbines, making it impossible for the turbines to be powered by the buildings movement.  The turbines are vertical wind turbines, according to cited source #6 (as of this writing). 168.9.120.8 (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 2008 changes 

message: The page needs updating - according the most up to date BBC article it's now 80 storeys and therefore a lot taller.  Source. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: This tag is inappropriate, the building is proposed, not NOT -NOT- under construction, nor even designed beyond conceptual ideas. Proxy User (talk) 12:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So remove the tag.  No need to get worked up about it! The Rambling Man (talk) 12:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not worked up at all about it, just don't want to see it back until (*if*) they start pouring concrete. Proxy User (talk) 12:21, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I added Template:Future building as this is what should have been there, instead of the construction template.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 22:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I updated the article to reflect both the proposed status, and the new announced future construction date (according to latest sources). Not sure, if that is sufficient to remove the 'outdated' flag. 85.179.80.27 (talk) 10:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building Under Construction Tag 

message: The last paragraph or so in the article makes no sense.  It sounds as though the workers will be ground up and used as lube.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.84.11.45 (talk) 19:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Part makes no sense. 

message: The Dynamic Tower claims to be the first building to have its floors to rotate independently through a central axis is wrong. The first building of this kind has been built in 2004 the city of Curitiba in Brazil and it is called Suíte Vollard (Vollard Suite). --Pinnecco (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not innovative at all. Independently rotating floors was already been built 

message: The kilowatt-hour is a measure of energy.  By giving the energy produced by the building without specifying the amount of time it takes to generate that amount of energy (per second?, per year?, over the course of the building's lifetime?), no real information about the energy generation capacity of the building has been given. Jabaste (talk) 21:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Energy generation statistic gives no real information. 

message: What does "5 average american houses" mean? What is an average american house?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ameki (talk • contribs) 21:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 average american houses 

message: one cant find the right info of the projet about the no. of floors the wattage output they said it will complete this year where is that building in Dubai now !!! it is not completed yet ! you can see numerical conflict when you read diferent articles about this tower  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.153.129.87 (talk) 12:36, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''where can i find the right info.'''