lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Golden Buckeye

message: This is a free service provided by a state government agency, not an advertisement.  The main reason I created the article is so that the phrase "Golden Buckeye" included in another article (Gilbert Gnarley) could be linked here.  The phrase is used for comedic effect in a radio program, and the comedy only makes sense if people know what the phrase "Golden Buckeye" refers to.Mapcat 06:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of governors of West Bengal

message: I'm redirecting as Governor of West Bengal 🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 17:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Who is governor of Kolkata in 2022  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:A028:D1DB:0:0:1056:70B0 (talk) 11:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  GK 
Talk:2004 Indian general election in Rajasthan

message: Templates are not for storing data, especially, if the data is used in only one page (this page). It is totally inappropriate and does not meet template namespace guidelines. Hence the templates have been substituted. The templates will now be nominated for delete.
Also, please see point 4 within WP:INDISCRIMINATE, to improve this article. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 08:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates are not for storing data
Talk:List of Rajya Sabha members from Rajasthan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 
Talk:Janet

message: What's klakske? --WikiSlasher 06:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Klakske

message: Surely, as there is no other article called Janet, the move was unnecessary? If it was necessary then titling the article Janet (name) would be better. Andreworkney talkcontribs 15:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from Janet
Talk:Anjan Kumar Yadav

message: In the opening sentence, "was an MP" implies that the person is no more. 
In case Mr. Yadav is still alive, the opening sentence should contain "is a former MP"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydman (talk • contribs) 02:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Was' or 'Former' 
Talk:M. P. Veerendra Kumar

message: reads like a résumé of the subject  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.91.253.165 (talk) 18:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  résumé of the subject? 

message: add bellow references and enrich the article Rahul SomanDiscussions - contribs 20:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  add citations to article
Talk:Mom, I Need to Be a Girl

message: The title of the book is presented inconsistently regarding upper/lowercase. The cover presents it in all lowercase except for "I". The title page of the book also capitalizes "Mom". There's also a difference of including the leading ellipsis or not. But it seems to me that we should select one of these and use it consistently, including for the title of the article, which included capitalization the author did not use. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 21:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title case
Talk:National Center for Transgender Equality

message: This article was originally tagged as POV on September 2006 by User:Switchercat because it read like an advertisement. Since that time the article has undergone almost a complete rewrite to address the POV issues. I believe the original POV tag rationale has been resolved.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Queerudite (talk • contribs) 14:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot identify any bias in this article either.  I am removing the tag.--BirgitteSB 15:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:M. A. Kharabela Swain

message: the party article is not independently notable with no electoral victory . The founder is notable and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. DBigXrayᗙ 19:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support merge, my attempt to search for coverage of Utkal Bharat online only returned results about Kharbela Swain and press releases by the party. signed, Rosguill talk 23:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected, given that there is nothing to merge. Klbrain (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of Utkal Bharat into Mahamegha Bahan Aira Kharbela Swain
Talk:Russell Reid

message: Unless someone objects, I intend to revert all changes made to this article from 16:49, 17 August 2007 onwards. I'll admit to being partisan in this matter as an ex-patient of Russell, but a couple of the recent edits either deliberately or through not understanding the issues involved misrepresent the situation - adding additional links to the guardian newspaper for example, when their main journalist for TG/TS issues appears to have an axe to grind. (Their coverage is not unbiased) I'm the same user as Zoeimogen BTW, I messed up and ended up with two accounts. Zoeoconnell (talk) 01:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Came across this in passing, but was confused by the sentence concerning Curtis as Reid's 'successor'. Successor at what / which establishment? Nowhere near my area of expertise but someone might like to fix it. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 08:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dr Curtis took over Dr Reid's private practise in West London in 2006 and later that year moved it to Central London. ZoeL (talk) 02:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Richard Curtis
Talk:Michael Hollingshead

message: I found this list of books on the main page while editing Mr Hollingshead's bio.
I've shifted them here in case anyone should find them useful.
* Booth, Martin (2005) Cannabis: A History.
* Braunstein, Peter & Michael William Doyle (2002) Imagine Nation: The American Counterculture of the 1960s and '70s.
* DeRogatis, Jim Turn on Your Mind: Four Decades of Great Psychedelic Rock.
* Grunenberg, Christoph & Jonathan Harris (2005) Summer of Love: Psychedelic Art, Social Crisis and Counterculture in the 1960s.
* Harvey, Graham (2003) Shamanism: A Reader.
* Krassner, Paul (2005) One Hand Jerking: Reports from an Investigative Satirist.
* Leary, Timothy (1983) Flashbacks. Tarcher 
* Leary, Timothy (1968) High Priest. 
* Leary, Timothy (1968) The Politics of Ecstasy. 
* Lee, Martin A. & Bruce Shlain Acid Dreams: The Complete Social History of LSD: the CIA, the Sixties, and Beyond.
* Miles, Barry (2004) Hippie.
* Nocenti, Anne & Ruth Baldwin (2004) The High Times Reader.
* Norton, Robert (1996) Communication and Consequences CL: Laws of Interaction.
* Ronald A. Sandison (2001) A Century of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Group Analysis: A Search for Integration.
* Stafford, Peter G. (2003) Magic Mushrooms.
* Stafford, Peter G. Psychedelics Encyclopedia.
* Stevens, Jay (1987) Storming Heaven: LSD and the American Dream.
* Young, Paul (2002) L.A. Exposed: Strange Myths and Curious Legends in the City of Angels.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poppy Higgins (talk • contribs) 22:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of Books
Talk:Black people (terminology)

message: Under the entry for Canada, the term "African skin" is used - what is "African skin"? Is it different from dark skin?
:very good point. This needs editing of course.--Filll 13:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is EVERY WORD can become negative. I do not deny that currently the "n" word is highly negative in some populations, depending on WHO USES THE WORD. But that is how pejoration works. You erased the pejoration section huh? NAACP is a dirty word? Come on give me a break.--Filll 16:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm not sure if this was consensus intention but these two successive edits -  and  - effectively deleted all of the content of this article by making it a redirect but not merging content. I agree that it could all have used citation, but the section on how this term is used in various countries appears to have been accurate on all points that I am familiar with. - Jmabel | Talk 05:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content all effectively deleted
Talk:Blagoy Shklifov

message: I restored the edit from 21 January 2009 deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise. I would ask for more information about deleting - which part is naive and why?--Males (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linguistically naive summary 
Talk:Gharjamai

message: The translation doesnt give the translation for benchod which really sets the tone for the sentence, (a tone of impunity). Benchod = "sister-******" in gujarati, and these males are regarded as pussies therefore using this swear-word supposedly "reasserts their masculinity". If the main word is omitted the rest of the translation is suspect as well.Bakaman 07:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guju

message: I am afraid that this description of Gharjamai has been written by someone who thinks that sprinkling obscenities on a page in Hindi/Punjabi/Urdu will go unnoticed except by speakers of these languages. I would let it pass if humour was the sole intention of this piece, but it is not. It demeans women, because gharjamais are husbands who live in the homes of the women they marry (which is anathema in a rigidly patriarchal set up0. This is alleged to destroy the masculinity of a man and he is defined as someone who licks the genetalia of his father-in-law(gaandchato)and so on. And this is the politest part of the article. Please remove this article from the Wickipedia--it is not satire but salacious and obscene rubbish.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.199.89.241 (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  article on gharjamai is obscene, utterly male chauvinist and profoundly stupid 

message: The hatred of Ghar Jamais on the subcontinent and level of their derision is such, that words that may be termed obscene are, instead, used in everyday conversation to describe Ghar Jamais - Although their literal translations may be considered obscene in normal usage, their original meaning has become secondary, and these phrases and words are used interchangeably in place of 'Ghar Jamai', 'GJ'. Xghostfacexx 11:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language issues 

message: Article is full of obscene language. No verifiability for information in the article. Most references provided either fo not open or are not applicable to the information where they are cited. I have cleaned up the article.
Update : User:Alansohn thinks this is vandalism and has reverted it.
:Based on my review, I will retract the vandalism warning. Alansohn (talk) 20:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Due to the reverts betweem me and Xghostfacexx, I have requested a third party opinion on the language and information that should be kept in this article here Anish7 (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third party opinion 

message: The article is interesting Sanjida Humayra (talk) 05:58, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gharjamai
Talk:Western Interconnection

message: Alaska is not tied to the Western Interconnection.  I will be working on updating some of the pages in this subject matter and will eventually change this reference.  In addition, there is technically a fourth Interconnection (Quebec)... although it commonly is considered a part of the Eastern Interconnection.
Fjbfour 07:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The article sais "[...] 276 GW in 2019". I don't see where this number is taken from. Especially reference 5 states otherwise (265 GW in 2015), and makes no statements for the year 2019. Do I miss a newer source? The latest I could find was 265,700 MW in 2017 State of the Interconnection Digest (Summer 2018) page 2. WECC,2018..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamurDrachir (talk • contribs) 11:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Nameplate Generation Capacity
Talk:Ramgarh Cantonment

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source of whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. -- P.K.Niyogi 07:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 

message: Ramgarh cantt 2405:201:A409:9834:5497:CB26:CB44:B50F (talk) 14:36, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ramgarh cantt
Talk:Street organ

message: I just finished watching a 1959 British movie entitled "Operation Amsterdam."  It is a WWII movie about the British in Holland helping keep diamonds out of the hands of the Nazi's.  There was some pretty extensive footage of some kind of street organ that resembles the Dutch Street Organ described here.  Has anyone seen this movie or does anyone know about the authenticity of the street organ used in the movie?  Pretty interesting!
Jeepguy48 07:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Street organ in Operation Amsterdam

message: :In the United Kingdom, street organ is often used to refer to a mechanically played piano like instrument. This is incorrect, and such instruments are called a Barrel piano.
"Incorrect" seems a bit prescriptive: if that's what it's called, then that's what it's called, surely?  I guess some minor rewording is all that's called for... but my mind's gone blank, so maybe someone else could take a look. —Vom (talk) 16:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Incorrect" without a rather pointed WP:RS should be removed TEDickey (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Incorrect"

message: (...) and as a result the tradition of playing an organ on the street entered Dutch culture where they remained a common sight until the beginning of the 21st century; they have all but vanished, since.
While there may be less organs on the street as there used to be, I think that "all but vanished" is incorrect. In fact, the Dutch page about the street organ, nl:Draaiorgel states:
Er zijn nog ongeveer zestig actieve orgelspelers in Nederland
(there are about sixty street organ players active in the Netherlands)
Lúthien Dulk (talk) 21:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   re. street organs in the Netherlands 

message: Also "Leierkasten". Never heard Strassenorgel. They do exist but are more a vintage hobby and less a profession.--Bronstein (talk) 22:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  German: [[Drehorgel]] 

message: I am going to remove this claim and its surrounding discussion:
: For instance, it is considered lucky for a couple in Denmark to have a barrel organ playing outside on the morning of their 25th wedding anniversary.
This claim has been uncited since it was introduced in 2004.   I made a brief attempt at corroborating it and found nothing.
Anyone who can find a reliable pre-2004 citation for the claim  should feel free to add it back. —Mark Dominus (talk) 19:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danish wedding anniversaries
Talk:The History Channel: Civil War – A Nation Divided

message: This entire page seems to be focused only on the Xbox version when the game was released for many systems. A section of the page is comparing the lay out of the controller to call of duty. How is that at all relevant? Looking down the page I see Xbox so many times. There is a section dedicated to Xbox problems but nothing on the large amount of criticism this game received for its anachronisms. 131.230.146.135 (talk) 23:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: bias
Talk:USS Herndon (DD-198)

message: This mentions U-956 as a possible cause of her sinking, but makes no mention of U-286. Drutt (talk) 12:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: U-956
Talk:Fast Folk

message: New York Times Articles (use to expand article or just read)
* Pop/Jazz, January 27, 1984
* Critics' Choices, January 20, 1985 (2nd ann Fast Folk Music Show)
* The Pop Life, February 20, 1991 (8th ann Fast Folk review)
* Pop/Jazz: "Where Folk Really Does Mean Folk" by Stephen Holden, February 21, 1991
-MrFizyx 07:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Everland

message: Hello! 
I am a recent editor on this Wikipedia page as I added two small points which I can outline here. The first detail was the approximate size of the theme park according to the research paper I was referencing. The second addition identifies the company that purchased Everland in 1996 to transform the resort into a large-scale amusement park and water park. Both of these details came from the same source, which is the 4th citation ("Adapting Disneyland's service strategy to Korea's Everland theme park" by Haesun Paik). If any updated statistic is discovered from a credible source regarding my contributions, please feel free to make any necessary modifications.
While researching the general structure of Everland, I came across this case study performed by Yang-Choon Park and Jeong-Su Choi. According to the abstract, the researchers investigated the life cycle of theme parks with a special focus on Everland. Such information could be very valuable to this Wikipedia article. Unfortunately, I cannot understand the text as the findings are recorded in Korean so I figured to relay the source here in case anyone can look more into it. The article is found on this site:
https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO200220149332118.page
The PDF can be downloaded from the website above but here is the link in case: https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO200220149332118.pdf
I am curious to see what other editors can deduce from this source to continue building this Wikipedia page. 
- Winlin100 (talk) 18:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential New Source (Case Study)
Talk:Crossgates Commons

message: Added the equivalent of a digital land acknowledgement, based on information from the Albany Pine Bush entry. Younvrknow (talk) 03:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land acknowledgement 

message: No part of Crossgates Commons is in Guilderland, New York; the Crossgates Mall is in Guilderland, but not Crossgates Commons.Camelbinky (talk) 08:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Miguel Ángel Osorio Chong

message: Please review this for correctness in naming convention (Chong, or Osorio?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.25.211.33 (talk) 17:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish naming convention 
Talk:Fornax Cluster

message: While galaxy membership lists are easy to compile for groups of galaxies, they are nearly impossible to compile for clusters as large as the Fornax Cluster.  Such lists may contain hundreds of galaxies.  Hence, I have been deleting such lists when they appear on galaxy cluster pages.  If other people disagree with me, please discuss the issue here.  
As a compromise, it may be worth simply describing the galaxy membership in general terms (such as the number of elliptical galaxies, the number of spiral galaxies) and mentioning specific member galaxies of interest (such as NGC 1316 and NGC 1365 in the case of the Fornax Cluster). Dr. Submillimeter 07:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that lists as lists are of limited value. But I believe that the concept behind "wikification" is that of the power of neural-like networks, as conceptually cross-connected as real objects are. As such, I believe it is important that all the galaxies within a cluster be connected via the appropriate category. Vegasbri (talk) 21:30, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Galaxy membership list
Talk:Gong Soo

message: How can Gong Soo be the mistaken writing? And if it is the mistaken way to write it, why make an article out of it???
If I am not mistaken Kong Soo Do is written in Korean as 공수도 which can be perfectly written as Gong Soo Do, but even better would be Gong Su Do (if you use the Modern Korean Romanization).
Kbarends 07:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Caesar Baronius

message: A mention of Baronius Press, named after the late Cardinal, would be of note in this Wikipedia article. The Royal Oak (talk) 00:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baronius Press 

message: The article currently has "Baronio died at Santa Maria in Vallicella in Rome on 30 June 1607" and the specific meaning of this is lacking: Why did he die in that church? What was he doing there?  Latin Beau  22:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More explanation needed
Talk:Text folding

message: I would argue against merging it with folding editor. I was searching for how to make a text folding feature on a mediawiki article and i would say that's a usage of text folding where a folding editor is not needed.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.130.183.202 (talk • contribs) 
:The term "text folding" pretty much is a term for a feature of folding editors and this article is written that way.  Due to that, and since both articles are fairly short it's probably a good idea to merge them.  Specific information about mediawiki features don't really belong in the main article namespace anyway. -- Heptite (T) (C) (@) 00:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with "folding editor"
Talk:Mount Hood Village, Oregon

message: Is the above a consensus? Per Nino, who top posted so apparently his/her post didn't get seen, I don't necessarily agree with the now-complete merger, but since I didn't !vote, I'll leave that for now. In any case, the merger has left a mess in its wake, (each community now links to this article twice) and I'd encourge the pro merge folks to clean up! I tried to clarify in the intro how the two entities are separate (which just highlighted for me why the merger wasn't a good idea) but further clarification would be welcome. Thanks. Katr67 (talk) 22:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: While I don't feel strongly one way or the other—which is why I hadn't commented before—I have trouble following what distinctions there might be between Mount Hood Village, Oregon and Villages at Mt. Hood, Oregon.  If I found a juicy fact, how would I know which article to add it to?  The merger is helpful in this regard.  —EncMstr 00:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged articles