lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stephen O'Malley

message: Isn't there some better picture? This one shows hardly anything at all! --Zouavman Le Zouave 10:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a new website with several official photographs https://stephenomalley.com/ SOMA 20:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Says on his page (and this source that he's done album artwork for Burzum, Emperor, Melvins, Boris and Earth ... curious if anyone knows which specific albums? Tactical Fiend (talk) 20:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Discogs.com has extensive information on this topic. Also there is a new website with extensive biography https://stephenomalley.com/ SOMA 20:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album art 
Talk:Bartolomeo Pinelli

message: the article says several times "stamps, I belive it's "engravings" instead --Melaen 00:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am writing to propose an external link to a webpage where is available online a book from Pinelli.
http://www.romanbookshelf.com
Thank you
Diegom-08 09:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  external link
Talk:Death of Caroline Byrne

message: I am taking off the categories labelling this case as murder as this is not certain and the case is currently sub judice. Please see further discussion on this issue under the Max Stuart case.--Jack Upland 00:16, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: Undid vandalism attributing today's acquital to the justice system being 'a joke'. Euchrid (talk) 04:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acquital 

message: Murder conviction has been overturned - suicide suggested as a possibility. 121.222.43.174 (talk) 05:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "MURDER" heading needs to be deleted 

message: It was suicide then. So why the crime navbox ? -Sticks66 13:23, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navbox 

message: I've removed the suicide categories as it has not been determined to be suicide. The Court of Appeal said that suicide had not been excluded. It did not rule out the possibility that Wood killed her, just that it had not been proven beyond reasonable doubt. It also did not rule out the possibility of murder by someone else. I've also removed the link to "miscarriages of justice" because there is no consensus that this was a miscarriage of justice.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide categories
Talk:Blood Omen 2

message: "Kain, knowing what Janos' revival would cause (see Blood Omen 2: Legacy of Kain)" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_of_Kain:_Defiance)
I don't see that here.
79.239.170.27 (talk) 15:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've heard that before, but nobody ever really backs it up with proof. They just claim Soul Reaver 2 caused it without really going into it. This is probably because BO2 was not written by the same people who had done every other game in the series and so we really don't have "word of god" confirmation on any of it.--68.6.182.39 (talk) 04:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an official confirmation of this. We'll be adding it to the page when we begin reworking it. --LoK Wiki (talk) 16:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs story summary 

message: It's been shown the game got mixed reviews judging from the scores, but a section about why they were given and what reviewers thought of the game would be nice. I'm kinda sensing a bit of bias on the Legacy of Kain articles.--68.6.182.39 (talk) 04:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Reception?
Talk:CSI: Dark Motives

message: --Sowsearsoup 21:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I made "Sara Sidle" an internal link 
Talk:World War II/to do

message: add suggestions here...
* the beginning of the article states that the cause of world war ii is germany's invasion of poland.  this would be the beginnig of the european war, not the cause.  the cause of the second great war can be traced back to the terms of the treaty of Versailles at the end of the first world war.
-the article on ww2 states that Japan attacked Indochina on july 24, 1941. This was not the case. Under Japanese pressure a treaty was signed that day, allowing Japan to make use of Indochina airbases and such. some fighting along the border did take place the year before.
*Hi there - re: Flags of Combatants in the block on right hand side of WW2 page, shouldn't the correct Japanese flag for the period be the rising sun version, with the Rays coming out of the sun?
++No see Flag of Japan, the version you're talking about is just the naval ensign. Lisiate 20:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Don't be a fanatic

message: How can this page be a guideline without any discussion? It may be a good essay, but it is not authorized by consensus yet. Also, it doesn't seem actionable.  Bidabadi 00:35, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old content

message: Nice guideline. It is very useful. - Davodd (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good job 

message: I will not endure "lighten up" anywhere.  A man said it to me once, and then the next day drove me almost to suicide.  It is an insult, and a badly hidden insult at that.  It says: your suffering is an illusion -- can't you see that everyone else is well off?  --VKokielov (talk) 04:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lighten up" 

message: The last of the four "Remedies" reads, ""Lighten up and take another break!". My reason for adding a "Talk" entry is to ask, "What is the first break, that makes a future break "another" break?" 
I noticed too, that user VKokielov pointed out that the phrase "lighten up" is probably an inappropriate suggestion, regardless of the context. I've considered his view and I agree with it. The expression, "Lighten Up!" is used to marginalize someone indirectly, by minimizing their feelings. So, what VKokielov wrote is accurate. 
He created his Talk entry about 6 months ago and there has been no response to it. Perhaps what I've written, together with his remarks, provides sufficient reason to remove the last Remedy; the remedy I am asking about. Or, perhaps there isn't sufficient interest in this page for someone to have noticed.
I plan to remove the remedy in the near future unless someone tells me not to. I do not know if I am permitted to do so; so I hope someone comments on my plan.
[The quote included with the copy about "Zeal" is directly related to this: 'Fanaticism obliterates the feelings of humanity.' (credited to Edward Gibbon). The matter at hand pertains to these feelings, precisely!]
Kernel.package (talk) 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Another" Break? -- Remove the last "Remedy"
Talk:SMS (illustrator)

message: I have just removed most of the article, as it was unsourced and in places definitely unencyclopaedic in tone. Normally I would applied clean-up tags, but WP:LIVING is quite explicit that unsourced material should be removed immediately from biographies of living people. 
I'm disappointed to have to do this, partly because I know that SMS was delighted to find that somebody had written the article. But WP:LIVING is important. I hope that somebody can find some proper references for material I have removed, and can then restore it. --ColinFine (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material
Talk:New Ireland Province

message: New Ireland was initially thought by European explorers to be part of New Britain.
In 1767 Philip Carteret found that it was separate, and named it "Nova Hibernia" (Latin for New Ireland).  The first colonial administration was German, under which the island was given the name "Neu-Mecklenburg"; when Australia took control during WW1 it was renamed "New Ireland".
(Hmm, I should probably update the article with this...)  Wantok 02:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: This article states that Mussau Island is the largest island of the group.
This is clearly wrong as New Ireland is the largest island of the group. 
Did the author mean it is the largest other island, which seems unlikely as New Hanover looks bigger.
I suspect the author meant it was the largest  island of St. Matthias Islands? (It does mention this at the end of the sentence.)
I will do further research and see if I can change the article to make more sense tomorrow, unless the original author sees this and can make it reflect their original intentions before then? MWchat (talk) 11:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading statement about Mussau
Talk:Platinum (Mike Oldfield album)

message: This diff. Shalom Hello 16:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please check... 

message: Should we not replace the current image of the re-issued CD sleeve, which is ugly, cropped and features the title and artist in ridiculously big font, with the original elegant looking LP sleeve? The differences are significant! MadTheDJ (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Art
Talk:Five Miles Out

message: The article currently states: "Five Miles Out" is a song that has a complex structure despite its unusual length. "Five Miles Out" is listed later in the article as being 4 minutes 16 seconds long; should this sentence be interpreted to mean "... despite its relatively short length by Oldfield's standards"? --Metropolitan90 03:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rewritten this. I think the author was trying to say that the song is unusually complicated for a relatively short pop tune (the production is very elaborate and the musical structure has several build-ups). But ideally this should be a referenced statement, e.g. "writing in The NME, Nick Kent said that QUOTE the song has an unusually complicated structure for a relatively short pop song UNQUOTE", otherwise it's just an opinion. I know that Nick Kent was unlikely to have reviewed Five Miles Out in 1982. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 22:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: Who was the cover artist? Drutt 22:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there's a signature at the bottom right of the painting. But I don't have a copy of the album to hand. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 22:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover 

message: Is that Maggie Reilly singing in the video, or an actress miming her words? If so, who was it? Danceswithzerglings (talk) 03:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video
Talk:Crises (album)

message: Note that the Terry Ilott who painted the artwork for the 'Crises' cover is not the same person referred to in our Wikipedia article:  Terry Ilott. Please do not Wikilink it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terry Ilott artwork. 

message: As strange as it may seem, it would appear that 187.170.38.157's reverted edit concerning a Ferrari being an instrument on the album may in fact be correct. As of 2012 Oldfield is remixing the album in 5.1 and he posted a screenshot of the Pro Tools session online which lists a section as "FERRAR" (likely the word FERRARI truncated). Listening to the "Crises" track, a sports car revving can certainly be heard at around 2:55, and sounds very much like a 1970s/80s Ferrari. As this is pretty much original research it perhaps can't go into the article, unless people think that the above screenshot is enough justification. TubularWorld (talk) 22:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferrari sound in "Crises" 
Talk:Discovery (Mike Oldfield album)

message: When one relocates from the UK - as did Mr Oldfield to Switzerland - does one not have to "settle up" (leaving tax, etc) with the departing jurisdiction? If I were to leave the US to live elsewhere I'd have to do this. 65.95.193.195 (talk) 05:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  General question - Relocation
Talk:Heaven's Open

message: Excuse my lack of wiki-nouse, or I'd add one of those "this does not meet wiki blah blah" headers to the page. This article reads like it has been written by a barely literate mouse, or more hopefully, someone who learnt English after several other languages. If that's the case, well done, but it needs editing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.171.158 (talk) 13:39, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tidied the article up a bit. TubularWorld (talk) 13:54, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

message: Main article mentions that HO continued the veiled attacks on Benson. How? --g  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.132.142.219 (talk) 07:24, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Music from the Balcony" is a set of short pieces glued together, with lots of gimmicky sound effects, accompanied by monkey(s) on the balcony shouting directions. A pretty obvious critique of Branson's interference. (I'd add this to the page, but it would only get removed as [citation needed]) Metamatic (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "veiled attacks on branson" 
Talk:Bell's spaceship paradox/Archive 1

message: I've added a wikilink to the Ehrenfest paradox, as it is very much the same situation. In the EP; the disc canot remain rigid when it starts rotating. If the disc is considered to consist of rigid spokes and not-so-rigid chords, the chords will break the BSP rope. Unfortunately, in the current state of our article, I didn't find a good way to link in the prose, so I've (temporarily) added a see also section. --Pjacobi 18:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'd like to expand Ehrenfest paradox and rewrite Bell's spaceship paradox and Rindler coordinates.  The last must come first, but will be tricky since I think a clean slate is advisable, but many have worked on the current version, etc.  Nonetheless, the current version fails to mention many of the most important and useful properties of these coordinates, and has many other defects. ---CH 00:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I have now completely rewritten Rindler coordinates from scratch, with completely new figures, to correct various errors in the text and figures of the previous version. ---CH 04:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to [[Ehrenfest paradox]] 

message: Whoever disputed the nuetrality of the main article on the grounds that "CERN colleagues" refers to one person, is mistaken. My small amendment makes it clear that Bell consulted a "poll" of his colleagues and Bell states explicitly in his book "Speakables and Unspeakables in Q.M." that all of them disagreed. - Rod Ball,  5 May 2006
:Rod, 
:#I added that flag, and there's nothing mysterious here.  Go back to the article and click on "history".  You will see my edit  listed.  (Sorry, I should have mentioned in the edit line that I was adding a POV flag.)
:#I moved your comment to the bottom of the page and created a new section.  The standard way to add a comment in a talk page is to add a new comment at the end of the appropriate section, or to go to the very bottom and begin a new section.
:#If you sign and timestamp your contribs by typing ~~~~ (four tildes) at the end of your comments, your timestamp will probably be given in UTC, which has obvious benefits, given the fact that Wikipedia has a global community of editors.
:---CH 04:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV flag
Talk:Tubular Bells 2003

message: This sentence: "The complaints may be the cause of the album's quick disappearance from the charts, which was not the case with the previous Tubular Bells (I, II and III) albums." looks more like an anti-CD-protection comment than a piece of encyclopaedic knowledge. If there's no source in the next week I'll delete it. Tompagenet 11:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers for that Stephenjh - although those links are interesting, they still don't justify, in my opinion, the line in the article. I am sure that some people will have been angered by the CD protection, and that some may have not bought the CD because of it, but to say that this may have made the album fall from the charts is a bit of a leap - some people probably didn't buy it as they thought it was another cash-in my Oldfield - the reviews for this were worse than for the original, and if we're being logical this is much more likely to account for a comparative lack of sales. Tompagenet 11:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complaints 

message: I am curious to know whether the track "A Minor Tune" is named so in reference to it not being a huge tune, or is it so named because it is actually played in the key A-Minor? MrZoolook (talk) 15:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Minor Tune?
Talk:Cecil B. Demented

message: How is this a cult film? Maikel 11:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not familiar with John Waters' work, are you? MMetro (talk) 10:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just because it's a John Waters film, doesn't make it a "cult film"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.110.139.245 (talk) 01:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cult film?

message: "underground directors' names, including Kenneth Anger, Sam Peckinpah, David Lynch, Otto Preminger, Herschell Gordon Lewis, Spike Lee, Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Pedro Almodóvar, and Andy Warhol." Some of these directors have movies with over 100'000 votes on imdb, hardly underground.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.162.212.172 (talk) 20:31, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  underground
Talk:Cry-Baby

message: No one had yuppie parents in 1954.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.155.200.66 (talk) 19:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  anachronism 

message: How can this be a 1960's teen movie, when its set in 1954?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.79.6 (talk) 23:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong description 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 23:13, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: “That same day, Cry-Baby approaches the "square" part of town to a talent show at the recreation center where Allison's grandmother hosts events, and introduces himself to her, who doubts his motives.”
surely the ‘who doubts his motives’ clause doesn’t work in this sentence? it would only work if the grandmother was the subject of the sentence 2.31.171.219 (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  grammatical error?
Talk:Claudja Barry

message: This entire article is obviously copied from a Claudja Barry press release.  -- eo 01:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted to the revision before 's edit, which removed everything (including things like categories) and replaced by a unwikified lump of text. If desired, 24.99.9.99's changes can be added back later, using the current version as a base. Have a nice day. --cesarb 01:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag

message: The following paragraph was place in the article, I have moved it here and will leave the editor a note (John User:Jwy talk) 17:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved comment

message: This section is similar to a trivia section - I would suggest either incorporating the facts elsewhere and/or creating a new paragraph here rather than bullets. (John User:Jwy talk) 02:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact section cleanup
Talk:The Specials (2000 film)

message: I removed the reference to Nightbird's eggs "containing various weapons".  This is never stated in the film, rather she says simply that she can lay eggs.  --Wtbe7560 26 November 2006 16:58
:Yes they do. Watch it again, at the end, after Weevill is on TV. Cheeser1 22:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fairly obvious that The Strobe was only saying that to make Nightbird feel better in front of the other members. Nightbird only told The Weevil that she could lay eggs, The Strobe didn't find out until everyone else did. MrDenton (talk) 04:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No - Nightbird confirm's The Strobe when she nods in agreement. The Strobe had seen her powers demonstrated in a video she submitted.  FYI, I also cleaned up references in the article to Eight's gender (he was specifically designated as "He" when Nightbird tried to refer to him as a "them."  And there is nothing in the movie, mentioned or implied, that Deadly Girl and Minute Man are best friends, so in the interest of accuracy, those references have been removed.  Finally, the repeated references to Power Chick as an "openly lesbian" woman have been removed. Being openly gay isn't a super power, she only mentions it twice during one scene in the film, and no one makes a big deal about it (except Amok, who's just pissed he isn't getting any).  If someone can come up with a better adjective for her personality, please use it.  Snicker|¥°€| 03:38, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:So I Married an Axe Murderer

message: According to Amazon and other sites, "There She Goes" is a cover of The La's performed by The Boo Radleys —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vynbos (talk • contribs) 12:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible errata 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Presidents

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: Thanks. Apokrif (talk) 20:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In [[Oval Office]], should "president's secretary" be wikified to [[Secretary_to_the_President_of_the_United_States#Personal_secretary_to_the_president]]? 

message: Hello, I just was wondering if anyone could help me to improve an article that I am creating that is a table of US presidents heights and weights. It can be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Heights_and_weights_of_US_presidents. If you could help me that would be greatly appreciated. Pickup Andropov (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof read for draft article 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency#Requested move 26 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency#Requested move 26 May 2024]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York#Requested move 31 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York#Requested move 31 May 2024]]