lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Streamwood, Illinois

message: as a lifelong resident in the area, I can tell you... I have never heard anyone refer to the village as "S-Wood"
as another lifelong resident in the village itself, I can tell you, I have heard a substantial amount of people say "S-Wood".... smells like lilac and fish? I dont think so  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seventeen17 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Actually, quite a number of SHS students use it when telling other HS students what high school they go to. In fact, the SHS boys basketball team used the term "S-WOOD" on their jerseys in the mid-ninties and S-WOOD can be seen on some of the high school's (older) sports equipment. Japan Acid 08:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And as a lifelong resident of Streamwood, I would like to kill myself.--MassProducedGod 02:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  S-wood is indeed used. 

message: Hey. No reason for the hostility pal. It's just a name. So just relax about it. And btw, i'm not a HS student. Graduated some time ago. I'll leave it out, but hey: Don't. Be. A jerk. 
Oh and "discuss as fairly as possible"? sure. Japan Acid 18:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dont be a jerk. 

message: Apparently there was some disagreement about "The Jug" and the cross-town rivalry between Streamwood and Bartlett.  I couldn't find anything about "The Jug" on either of the school's websites, and nothing but mirrored Wikipedia entries came up with a search on Google.  I also checked the varsity football schedules and Bartlett and Streamwood don't even play each other this year... If there is such a thing as "The Jug" and it is really a big deal, then citing a source for the information should eliminate the controversy.  --Aldryd 13:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross-town rivalry?
Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Britney Spears

message: It reads "making her as the youngest artist in the recording industry to be awarded a star.” It should be *Making her the youngest…* please delete/remove the inappropriate/wrong word “as” in the above to read instead "Making her the youngest (person?) in the recoding industry…” Thanks IrishLass2 (talk) 01:56, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please fix grammar in first sentence by removing misplaced word 

message: Britney received 4 awards by this organisation but they aren’t on here:
In 2000, “…Baby One More Time” won for being 4x platinum
( link: https://web.archive.org/web/20130901010930/http://ifpi.org/content/section_news/20010116.html )
In 2000/01, “Oops!… I Did It Again” won for the album being 4x platinum (link: https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-UK/Music/Archive-Music-Media-IDX/IDX/00s/02/MM-2002-09-07-OCR-Page-0036.pdf )
In 2002, “Britney” won for the album being 1x platinum
(link: https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-UK/Music/Archive-Music-Media-IDX/IDX/00s/02/MM-2002-09-07-OCR-Page-0038.pdf )
In 2004, “In The Zone” won for the album being 1x platinum
(link: https://web.archive.org/web/20071019051750/http://www.ifpi.org/content/section_news/plat2004.html ) Angelic2000s (talk) 19:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think they can be added. Are considered certifications, and are generally not accepted in these lists.  --Apoxyomenus (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They’re added on other artists like Christina Aguilera’s. So if that’s the case, they need to be removed on others. Angelic2000s (talk) 20:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi again. Yes, I also noted a plenty of them in some lists. You can remove them by yourself. I'm pretty sure it will be a safe move, at least considered the long process followed by various FL/reviews and edit summaries. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 05:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. thank you for responding! Angelic2000s (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome.--Apoxyomenus (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please can someone add Britney’s ‘IFPI Platinum Europe Awards’.  

message: Someone removed a new nomination. Not sure why but she’s been nominated for a 2023 BBMA and someone under ‘bojo’ removed it. LoverReps (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a nomination on
Talk:Coat of arms of Kyiv

message: :Cross posted from talk:kiev
This image should be removed as someone's modern fantasy. As best I know, the current coat of arms is exactly the same as was used during Catherine the Great's reign. It is featured in Catherine's Gerbovnik as part of coats of arms of different noble families descended from Rurik, e.g., Baryatinsky, Volkonsky, Repnin, etc. --Ghirlandajo 7 July 2005 08:19 (UTC)
:Feel free to modify if you are sure the CoA is wrong and see whether anyone will claim you're wrong. I won't. As for the history of this image, I got it from ( http://www.heraldry.com.ua/index.php3?lang=E&context=info&id=476#verh ). Maybe they didn't know what they were writing about. --Irpen July 7, 2005 17:12 (UTC)
::AFAIK, Ghirla is correct. No image of Kiev COA from Catherine's time has been recovered so far. All drawings of the COA (including the one in the article) are made in our days based on the description . KPbIC 07:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed: Kiev Coat of Arms at the time of Imperial Russia

message: Is the Ark Angel Michael in control of Russia? 51.7.104.207 (talk) 13:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  War
Talk:Aurelius Victor

message: REGARDING "The second was first printed at Naples about 1472, in 410, under the name of Pliny (the younger), and the fourth at Strassburg in 1505."
What does 410 mean?  Is that a typo?
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by  24.30.126.76 (talk • contribs).
: It was an OCR error for 4to, i.e. 4 tomes. I've corrected this.
:: actually, 4to is an abbreviation in rare book librarianship which means quarto (not tomes); the size of the sheets used in printing and also for the size of the book. --FeanorStar7 (talk) 00:43, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Belly (film)

message: Looking at the choice of colors and visual syle in the movie, isn't it a noir film???????(LonerXL (talk) 10:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Noir Film?????????
Talk:Nakahama Manjirō

message: The sentence "In 1879, Majiro studied military science in Europe during the Franco-Prussian War" can't be quite right (and *I* wrote it) since FPW was (according to wikipedia) 1870-1871. Unfortunately I wrote that sentence from information in the Webber book, which I returned to the library. Anybody got better info on that?  rewinn 02:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Military Studies in Europe

message: Dear John Manjiro page editors/administrators,
My name is Tracy and I work for The Standard Times website (SouthCoastToday.com). We are the local newspaper for South Coast Massachusetts. The reason why I'm writing is because we have constructed a page on our website in remembrance of John Manjiro. The link to this page is http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=SPECIAL02
We have also written an article on 12/8/06 on how Fairhaven, MA is going to renovate William Whitfield’s home on Cherry Street and turn it into both a bed and breakfast and museum dealing with the Manjiro legacy. I wanted to know if it was ok to add some information from this article to the Wikipedia page? The link to this specific article is http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061208/NEWS/70308147/-1/SPECIAL02
If we cannot submit information on the page for the renovation, can we add our link of SouthCoastToday.com/Manjiro to the External Links section. I think that this page would be very useful for the public to get a more local view of the complete story.
If someone could please get back to me when they have a second, that would be appreciated.
Thank You,
--Tracys49 17:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to add information & link to John Manjiro page 

message: The sentence "In September 1853, Manjirō was summoned to Edo (now known as Tokyo), questioned by the shogunate government, and made a hatamoto (a samurai in direct service to the shogun" isn't quite right... the date is wrong. I don't know what it is , but I know it is wrong because it contridicts the sentence "In July 8,1853, when Commodore Matthew Perry's Black Ships arrived to force the opening of Japan" which I know is right because I read something like that in the book "Shipwrecked!:The true adventures of a Japanese boy" by Rhoda Blumberg. (If you don't believe me you check it out yourself.)
                                                                                    Swamplog (talk) 01:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Bristle

message: I don't know why this page redirected to Bristol, maybe it's a common spelling mistake. But Bristle is hair like pigs hair, I thought it was only Pig's hair until I looked for a proper definition. Also 
I didn't know what the hell to give as a stub message, I put tool related becasue of the reference to paint brushes. Borb 21:31, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's more of a humorous misspelling than a common mistake. I've explained it in the article. --rbrwr± 20:14, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 08:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-16 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Mock turtle soup

message: I can't find any reference to this being of Chinese origin?
:Ah yes, it's actually a mock of a French or Russian cuisine. This's slip. :) -- Jerry Crimson Mann 07:49, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think not. As far as I know, this is an English dish. See:  and . Burschik 08:05, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see... -- Jerry Crimson Mann 08:50, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Commments

message: I am deleting the bit about the Mock Turtle Band. Please provide proof of notability here. Thanks. --Lord Voldemort 30 June 2005 18:31 (UTC)
:Anyway, it would seem more appropriate to mention a band with such a name under Mock Turtle than here under the soup.--BillFlis 12:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mock Turtle Band 

message: I have photos of the menu KimFromVirginiaUSA (talk) 01:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mock Turtle Soup, 1820 Menu, Mountain  Lake Lodge
Talk:Floral design

message: Most of the content of this page is covered in floristry including the descriptions of what designers do. Rather than starting another article, I would like to see the current one cleaned up and developed.
* The links within the Floral Design Schools and Floral Design Promotion Associations lead to a site which has copied the titles and descriptions from Open Directory Project categories without proper attribution and I believe those links should be deleted.
* The list of designers leads to pages that don't exist, except one. Why is it currently necessary?
** I still quesiton the need for this page, but since it exists, it needs built out, including articles about the notable designers and far better information about floral design.Camillia (talk) 01:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: need for this article?

message: I have seen the floral designer Preston Bailey and I know for a fact he is not a 8 year white child actor.  The link of Preston Bailey the floral designer under "Floral design" article directs the user to a child actor of the same name.
* I agree. Nothing has yet been written about notable floral designer Preston Bailey, but he certainly warrants an article. Camillia (talk) 01:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Link of Floral Designer Preston Bailey 

message: I added a copy editing template noting the lack of inline citation in this article. SpiritedMichelle (talk) 03:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: and synonyms such as  currently redirect to a mix of Floral design and Floristry. There is a consensus that they should all redirect to the same place, but not about which target is best - please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 10#Flower arrangement. Thryduulf (talk) 09:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like there was a lot of discussion on this, but none of the solutions involved improving the articles and making them more clear. The broad definition at the top of Floristry has no citation, but the article certainly seems more complete than this one. I ended up on this page because of a link from Ikebana, but this page doesn't talk about different styles of floral design while Florist does. If anyone else is keen to work on the content of the pages (not worrying about priority or preference of the articles for the time being), please chime in. —Zujine|talk 15:02, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flower arrangement and synonyms
Talk:List of Unix daemons

message: This partial list is rather pointless, given that it makes no effort to explain *which* Unix uses these daemons. It should be relegated to a list in the daemon article. --Joy [shallot] 22:11, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The article was deemed worthy for inclusion in Wikipedia: the result of the AfD was to keep it, because it's functional and appropriate as a Wikipedia article per Wikipedia notability guidelines, and its inclusion is congruent with building Wikipedia. Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article has been included in Wikipedia
Talk:Wisden Cricketers' Almanack

message: Something should be put in about the long running woodcut on the cover being controversially dropped by Tim de Lisle during his one-off year in the job. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.20.114 (talk • contribs) 13:23, 4 February 2006
:Thank you for your suggestion!  When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in!  (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold.  Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly.  If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. --Nick Boalch ?!? 18:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have addressed this- not sure there's any controversy any more. Jockosaurus (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover

message: It would be nice if there was a complete list of editors, with their dates. That's something that doesn't seem to be available anywhere on the WWW, as far as I can see, not even in the Wisden Archive at Cricinfo. I'm sure I've seen a list in one of my cricket reference books somewhere - possibly an old edition of Wisden itself - but I haven't been able to run it to ground.
JH 17:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editors

message: "...and is among the most famous sports reference books published in the United Kingdom" seems to me to be an understatement. I don't think that there's much doubt that it's the most famous. I don't know how one could prove that, though the number sold each year (which I suspect is greter than any other sport reference book) might be one indication.
JH 17:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reworded that section, hopefully to everyone's satisfaction.Jockosaurus (talk) 10:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment on the latest edit

message: My copy of the 2008 Wisden makes it clear in the Editor's notes that Matthew Engel has decided he won't be coming back after this year and will retire permanantly as editor - Sciald Berry who is editing this year will stay on as the new editor. This probably ought to be verified and added to the article. 194.74.227.66 (talk) 11:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of Editor

message: [(http://www.espncricinfo.com/wisdenalmanack/content/story/635373.html)] --Dweller (talk) 13:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a number of articles in the current Wisden to mark the 150th edition which have useful material about the almanack's history, of which that article is one. There;s also one on the history of the Cricket Reporting Agency. When time permits I hope to do something with the material - though I'd be delighted if somebody else did so first. JH (talk page) 17:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good source material
Talk:Apex predator

message: I added back the obvious reality that all cat species (including the domestic cat) are formidable predators so that the gallery would not be loaded with cat images. The tiger and lion (probably also the cheetah) are different enough in their hunting techniques to merit inclusion in the gallery, but all other cats (including the domestic cat) are so similar to tigers in build, behavior, and hunting techniques that one solitary cat (the tiger) is enough.Pbrower2a (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see what you're trying to do but the 'all' or 'other' wording isn't right. I'll give it a tweak. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nope. The article is not slightly lacking in cats: the article is way topheavy in images, and very light on cited text discussing the actual biology. Wikipedia is not some National Geographic magazine full of Big Cats and exciting landscapes, that is not our function. It's time for serious articles in ecology - a biological science - to reflect the actual research and conservation literature. An article of the current length would normally contain no more than four or five images. There's plenty of room on Commons for gallery pages. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cats as a group 

message: I know that Wikipedia is not a forum, but I gotta say that Chiswick Chap did a really good job on this article. Many thanks. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's very kind of you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article 

message: Food is the best 2601:244:4480:3BE0:B479:6CEB:1860:862A (talk) 04:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Food 

message: Apex predator 158.62.101.179 (talk) 13:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 

message: Ranked gameplay on apex legends Eh ok ig idk (talk) 20:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apex legends predator 

message: This article is marked as good article, but it is missing an exahaustive list of Apex predators, that would be usefull. 188.237.175.253 (talk) 12:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A list of Apex predators is necessary
Talk:ISO 9000

message: Just a note to editors of this article that consensus formed for Quality Objectives to be marged into this article.  Thanks, —░]PaleoNeonate█ ⏎ ?ERROR░ 04:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality Objectives 

message: In the background is this quote:
> and the U.K's "Def Stan 05-21 and 05-24. Large organizations which supplied government procurement agencies often had to comply with a variety of quality assurance requirements for each contract awarded which led the defence industry to adopt mutual recognition of NATO AQAP, MIL-Q and Def Stan standards. Eventually, ISO 9000 was adopted as a suitable option, instead of forcing contractors to adopt multiple - and often similar - requirements.
The double-quotes are missing from the end, so it's unclear where the citation ends. For the same reason, I can't fix it. In addition, both this and the previous citation don't cite their sources. 67.200.201.137 (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: When searching google for the first sentence, all I find are copies of this article.  If we can't find a source for the claims we may need to simply remove them.  —PaleoNeonate – 18:39, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Background Citation?

message: Easy to Use and For another reason Oneappleone (talk) 13:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk Page 

message: This section fails to adopt a neutral tone and appears to be openly written as a rebuttal to criticisms. The most egregious example of this being the start of the paragraph "Incorrectly, John Seddon, states without reason that ISO 9001 promotes...". The references given in this paragraph are to the original criticisms, the rebuttals remain unsourced and apparently written by the editor.
I'm tagging this section with an unbalanced warning, apologies if that makes it a drive-by tagging, please undo if so.
Neil Monteiro (talk) 21:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms of ISO 9001 certification
Talk:Likelihood

message: This article previously redirected to likelihood function, but I could sense a significant difference, such as its talk page entry "Which came first? the common use as in "in all likelihood this will not occur" or the mathematical function?". I have the idea that likelihood can be expressed in terms of either probability and odds, or am I wrong? Anyhow, I think at least disambiguation page is warranted. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:00, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I don't think it should even be labelled as a dab page, as it could be massively expanded.  The book I cited, (James franklin, the science of conjecture) seems to be an excellent source for probabilistic reasoning before the invention of math -- goes back to insurance contracts for shipping in ancient egypt, greece, and various legal cases 500BC to 1500 AD that deal with the "likelihood" that something may or may not happen. I've only read the first chapter so far, but its fascinating... linas (talk) 21:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: This page was originally redirected to likelihood function. Then it became a stub because of the colloquial usage of the term. However, the discussion of likelihood as different from the function was only a single sentence and does not deserve its own page. The remainder of the page was basically a redirect to likelihood function anyway. I've merged the content and redirected this page to the appropriate section of the other page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prax54 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Likelihood Function
Talk:Chemical imbalance

message: All but the first paragraph of this section is unsourced. That's not surprising, since the unsourced paragraphs misrepresent the current state of medical science. The article claims that there are no physiological abnormalities which can be demonstrated through objective laboratory testing in the brains of depressed and otherwise mentally ill individuals. However, deceased depressed patients have been shown to have greater numbers of 5-HT2A receptors  (the full article text is necessary, and can be accessed through a university computer).
Receptor counting and other highly involved evaluations of brain physiology are not used for the diagnosis of mental illness in living patients simply because they currently cannot be effectuated without destruction of the tissue being tested. Jennifer500 (talk) 04:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predominately spurious "criticisms" section 

message: All the citations in the monoamine hypothesis paragraph are broken except one.
--128.243.253.111 (talk) 11:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Monoamine Hypothesis Paragraph

message: The citation in the following sentence in the first section is broken: 
:In the 1950s the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and tricyclic antidepressants were accidentally discovered to be effective in the treatment of clinical depression.[1]
--ThinkerDreamer (talk) 19:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening Paragraph
Talk:Ukrainian shah

message: I believe that we should merge the section "Postal stamps" of this article into "Ukrainian shah" article. The shah article mentions that "shahs" were used in Ukrainian People's Republic and West Ukrainian National Republic, and it would make more sence to have the text in one article, instead of in two separate ones. Any thoughts? —dima/s-ko/ 23:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge section "[[West Ukrainian National Republic#Postage stamps|Postal stamps]]" → "[[Ukrainian shah]]"