Talk:Jim Nussle

message: Continual insertion of personal beliefs into this entry prompted the POV tag. - Jaysus Chris 07:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FourthAve, show us where the Abramoff info comes from, because you're wrong.  Some of the people who did business with him donated money to Nussle.  Nussle returned it when he learned about the connection, the same way Harkin did.  (And Nussle actually got less money than Harkin incase you wanted to make a partisan issue out of this.). - Jaysus Chris 17:32, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I removed the following because I don't think it's true.  These were voice votes, as I understand the situation, and Nussle was commended by the QC-Times for voting against removing standards to allow DeLay stay in leadership while under indictment.  Do you have a citation?
"Last year, he voted to weaken the ethics rules to allow indicted individuals to still hold leadership roles. He also voted twice to make sure bills to strengthen the ethics rules did not come to a full House vote." - Jaysus Chris 17:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I could not find a QCT cite for it, but Dubuque Telegraph-Herald has it int the November 21, 2004 issue, age Pg. a16 - Jaysus Chris 18:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethics Committee

message: I see nothing worthy of the name "discussion" here, so I'm unprotecting the article. --Tony Sidaway 02:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This RFC, and edits simlar to the commentary you removed (as well as personal attacks elsewhere) are what prompted the protection request.  As you can see by the reaction at the RFC, discussion doesn't seem to be an option. - Jaysus Chris 03:55, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotecting

message: I had asked for the Nussle article to be placed in semi-protect status because of vandalism to the article that has taken place over the past day.  People that know me know that I am no Republican, but Wikipedia is not the place, and my interest in fixing this is to ensure that the article holds to a higher standard and remains as netural as possible.
During all the activity, the paragraphs about the Bono connection got taken out, so I went ahead and put them back in.  I did that for the same reason that I gave above, because I think it deserves some sort of mention, if for no other reason than to make people aware that there are people who'll change articles for political benefit despite the NPOV policies.
JesseG 04:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Activity 

message: Was referred to as "foreign owned" - it's listed on Nasdaq and the UK stock exchange. Foreign is also a word whose meaning depends on the reader. Rich  Farmbrough 22:46 10  May 2006 (UTC). 22:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WPP 

message: Spelling:bacame==>became You can help!
Aclayartist (talk) 16:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling error 

message: Content looks OK, but only a single citation means that this article is not up to B-Class standards. I have downgraded it to C-Class accordingly. PC78 (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:BIOGRAPHY]] reassessment 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jim Nussle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20060324%2FNEWS09%2F603240358%2F1001%2FNEWS
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110202222918/http://thenusslegroup.com/ to http://thenusslegroup.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I don't believe he was on the ballot in 2006 for his congressional seat, but it says that he "also lost it"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:140:8201:1476:ECEA:10F5:DB08:8712 (talk) 21:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 gubernatorial bid 

message: There is currently a paragraph in the Political career section recounting a statement placed on the page in 2006 by a lobbying group to further their agenda. I don't feel like this belongs on the page, but I would appreciate others' thoughts. Quorum816 (talk) 16:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on paragraph about an edit