lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fear of Pop: Volume 1

message: Fear of Pop is not a Ben Folds solo record.  Fear of Pop is the name of the band, and "Volume 1" is the name of the album.
Mikesherk 03:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Artist Credit

message: This page duplicates a lot of Fear of Pop, Volume 1. Should one of them become a redirect? slab 01:04, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate? 

message: This album doesn't belong in the Ben Folds Five chronology, as it is a Ben Folds solo disc.  --Cholmes75 16:28, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's currently in the Ben Folds chronology.--TheGrza 08:50, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong section 

message: This page duplicates a lot of Fear of Pop: Volume 1. Should one of them become a redirect? slab 01:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate? 

message: I've read nothing to make me think that Ben Folds is actually the running figure in the cover art.  The packaging art for all of Volume I was done by David Bethell from his series "Just Your Average Second On This Planet" (1997-1998).  This is according to the liner notes for the album.  I, for one, seriously doubt Ben Folds posed for one of Bethell's images, and there is no citation in the article--looks like a simple opinion to me.Funkeboy 11:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm taking it out--pure conjecture. Funkeboy 00:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Art 

message: removed unsourced info about divorce..please verify as per WP:BLP! Ling.Nut 19:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed unsourced 
Talk:Charlie Gracie

message: Text from: , no copyright statment there anywhere, go figure. Feydey 22:30, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issue?
Talk:Lordship of Argos and Nauplia

message: Choess's edit in 29.5.2005 caused a loss of extensive amount of relevant information. The edit make the situation lose any idea that Dukes of Athens were overlords of lords of Argos-Nauplia. Also, a laboriously collected list (analysis) of whom of the lords were redisent, is now lost. Besides, the list of lords now lacks a few persons who attestedly utilized powers of lord or boverlord in A-N. And, the article now omits totally the fact that Guy d'Enghien and his daughter USED the ducal title. I wait for these losses to be corrected. 62.78.104.183 22:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Collective

message: I think an important distinction to make here is between open and closed collective. I have been in and valued collectives that have been 'open' that is open to anyone to join by turning up and becoming active. The special value these types of collectives (or networks) have is that they are permeable to cultural influences from the wider host culture. e.g. Brixton Artists CollectiveThis may make such formations capable of a level of innovative response that closed collectives are not so capable of if we take out definition of the central function of culture to be 'a continual reassessment of the totality'.
I'll see what discussion occurs before amending the front page... Of course it is not easy to define open ness - there are many varieties and degrees of open ness.
 Szczels 16:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: We fight for justice we want justice 2409:4063:4E9F:400E:223C:C9D3:47B0:6AD0 (talk) 12:54, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder
Talk:Stencil shadow volume

message: I put up a basic page called Shadow Volume a while back; this page is essentially a duplicate of that.  Neither page is close to complete, but we should make some attempt to merge the two. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Staz69uk (talk • contribs) 23:06, 29 May 2005.
:Done. Rainwarrior 23:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Carmack's reverse probably has as much information as it ever will have. It doesn't really belong in its own article; it is just a way of producing accurate shadow volumes. There's not much to say about it, so why not put it in the shadow volume article? - Rainwarrior 23:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll start working on it. I'd like to put them all in Shadow volume. - Rainwarrior 21:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carmack's reverse merge
Talk:Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab

message: Change "rafidah, which is an extreme Islamic sect" to "rafidah, which he regarded as an extreme Islamic sect". 
Note: His view was subjective, so the article needs to make it clear that that was his view rather than stating it as a fact. David.webb271327 (talk) 14:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I'm reading, it's the view of the source material, not the view of Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab, so the requested change would not be accurate. If this change should be made, you would need to provide a different source to be cited, and there may need to be a consensus supporting the change if we wind up with source material that says different things. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 18:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2021 

message: It is absolutely ridiculous to have this guy's name in calligraphy rather than show his picture. He is not a saint by any means, do not glorify him like this while treating other religious figures with less respect. Insane. 73.211.240.226 (talk) 02:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The absence of pictures has nothing to do with respect and everything to do with no pictures being available. —C.Fred (talk) 03:09, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2022 
Talk:Slovak declension

message: HTML tags should be replaced by wiki markup, "i. e." and "e. g." replaced by "that is" and "for example", and so on, throughout the article. - furrykef (Talk at me) 23:17, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, people. I just made the changes with the help of wikEd. Greetings --Tlustulimu (talk) 17:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Kallang–Paya Lebar Expressway

message: I see that this seems to cut a great length of underground, especially around the Nicoll Highway Section...was it affected by the collapse, and does it have any integrity problems? -- Natalinasmpf 23:17, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This expressway has nothing to do with Nicoll Highway, so it is not directly affected structurally. The only way it was "affected" was when the authorities asked all on-going underground tunnelling works to step up their safety measures.--Huaiwei 06:36, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Seems like construction for the interchange has been given the green light: http://www.onemotoring.com.sg/publish/onemotoring/en/on_the_roads/road_projects/construction_of_vehicular.html
Oahiyeel 16:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interchange with buangkok drive 
Talk:Knights of the Order of the White Eagle

message: Shouldn't Witold Lutoslawski be on this page? I have heard from many sources- including his page on this website- that he was a recipient of the Order of the White Eagle...
:Fell free to add him to the list (and others) - the list is incomplete--Witkacy 23:38, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

message: The names should be ordered alphabetically by FAMILY names, not by first names (with one exception of Pope John Paul II). So, the family Radziwiłł together, family Poniatowski ect. 
In Polish, the person is introduced in order "First name, Family name" but alphabetical order is always by Family name. I corrected it. 
(so, it is no more "Adam Kazimierz Czartoryski, Adam Stefan Sapieha..." order but "Leszek Balcerowicz, Władysław Bartoszewski..." order)
Merewyn 11:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  alphabetical order
Talk:Naples Plague (1656)

message: I know of no materials on this particular plague, although it could be related to the movement of Crusaders during that time period.  If so, the causal agent could be typhoid.  Medieval scholars, please take a look.  WBardwin 23:56, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Middle Ages were long over, as were the Crusades proper, in spite of later attempts to revive the "crusading spirit". The struggle against Ottoman domination of the Eastern Med though was still in full swing, see Cretan War (1645–1669). This was a continuation of the Crusades, but here we're getting into fancy discussions over the extended definition of that category of anti-Muslim wars. So a connection to the trade with the East, most certainly, but not with the mediaeval Crusades. Arminden (talk) 11:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: Title of this page is misspelled. Should be Naples'_Plague.
87.213.32.150 11:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected.--Trulexicon (talk) 10:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong. It stands for "Plague in Naples", not for "Plague belonging to Naples". No genitive, so no apostrophe-s. Arminden (talk) 11:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title misspelling
Talk:Dag Nasty

message: Go ahead, start somethin'.  I dare ya.
-Anonymous
Typical.
-Tuh
I added the discography and info on the 1991 and 1992 releases which had been left out by whomever wrote this article. There is a lot more info on Dag's lineup over the years and such which really should be added, too. --Mike 20:41, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is the only redirect for all ages shows, which is so weird.  For so many reasons. I want to write a proper all ages stub and remove the redirect. Might take a bit, though. Anyone else up for writing it? And/or any objections?  JSFarman (talk) 18:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect from [[All Ages Show]]
Talk:Rate equation

message: Added an explanation as to why the 2nd order equation includes a factor of two multiplying the rate constant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1388:803:CDFC:7C1F:DA6F:70F5:E9F0 (talk) 08:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second order equation #3 

message: During an assignment I found something I suspect to be a mistake in this section, I do not know how to edit these things myself. First it states that An/An-1=fRP, then it states that (fRP)n=(1-fBP)n, and at last it states that fBP=1-An/An-1, which would suggest that fRP=1+fBP. I hope someone can help me by correcting either of the equations, so 1 of the subtraction signs become an addition sign, Thank you in advance! A happy user  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.59.207.115 (talk) 16:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind this, I couldn't get it to make sense at first, after a few more minutes it began to make sense.87.59.207.115 (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small mistake in the Further properties of first order reaction kinetics? 

message: I propose that Order of reaction be merged into Rate equation. Based on what is in these articles, they seem to be the same subject and even have many of the same section headings. "Rate equation" is the more general term, so I recommend that it be the target; but Order of reaction is better written overall, so its content would mostly replace the corresponding sections in Rate equation. RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar) (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Yes, the articles discuss very similar subject matter with a lot of overlap. In fact I have often had trouble deciding in which of the two articles to search first for a given point. Combining them would solve that problem for everyone. I also agree that more material should be taken from Order of reaction which is now better written, but that Rate equation is a better title for the combined article because it is more often used in chemistry textbooks. Dirac66 (talk) 01:52, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: O.k., it has been a week. I'm going to do it. RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar) (talk) 00:42, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Order of reaction]]
Talk:Nordic Seven Years' War

message: So be patient already. This war did occur. It had nothing to do with the French & English Seven Years' War. And it certainly did not occur in Korea.  Truly – as it says – it occurred in Norway, Sweden, Denmark & the Baltic. Which is why it is called the “Nordic Seven Years' War.” I'm still researching and will post a writeup shortly. No need to try and fix it by tying it into any of the other of the many seven-years’ wars – just because one can’t find a reference to it on Google™.  Believe it or not, Google in NOT a complete source of all the world’s information. Williamborg 00:35, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What is up there now is an outline only. More coming! Williamborg 01:24, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Williamborg 06:45, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:20 mm Twin AA Machine Cannon

message: This article is useless as written. Avriette 00:46, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
This site has the same thing that is written in the article. Maybe someone can do something with it. http://www3.plala.or.jp/takihome/aa.htm --Sourduck 16:43, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  expand
Talk:French ship Redoutable (1795)

message: French ship of the line Redoutable (1791) → French ship Redoutable (1791) – Randomly moved against the standard naming convention for ships without redirecting any  of the links. 
===Voting===
*Support 
#See reasons above. JimmyTheOne 23:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: *Support 
#See reasons above. JimmyTheOne 23:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: Why has this page been moved from French ship Redoutable (1791)? That's the standard naming convention for ships of the line on Wikipedia. I'm happy for us to change that if we have good reason, but let's be consistent and re-direct the links. JimmyTheOne 23:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Er...these two paintings (both in this article) appear to be mirror-images of the same thing:
...both images claim to have been painted by Louis-Philippe Crépin (1772-1851) - the one on the left claims to have been scanned from "L'Empire des Mers, Martine Acerra & Jean Meyer", the one on the right says "The Redoutable at the battle of Trafalgar;" - both say that they were painted in 1807.
Clearly, this article shouldn't contain both of them - and one should probably be deleted from WikiCommons.  So which one is the mirror image?  I can't see any writing or an artist's signature to give it away.  Both were uploaded by User:Rama
SteveBaker (talk) 02:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIrror-imaged paintings?!?
Talk:Nuns and Soldiers

message: For a June 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Nuns and Soldiers
----
This is not an article, it is someone's belief.  Fix it or delete it.
: It's not the best article in Wikipedia, but it's better than nothing. I have corrected some basic spelling errors. --80.176.142.11 (talk) 16:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The heading says Anne is one of the two main characters but the article doesn't mention her.  Puzzling . . .  Vernon White . . . Talk  10:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anne
Talk:Andy Douglas

message: Andy Douglas (wrestler) → Andy Douglas : Andy Douglas currently redirects to Andrew Douglas; however, Andrew Douglas does not appear to be commonly known by that name. Moving the page would enable more direct linking. : McPhail 19:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 08:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:66th United States Congress

message: Browsing for projects, just stumbled across this page... more stubb than completed.  Marked for TLC and as Stub Fabartus 01:15, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is correct: see Talk:Woodrow Wilson#March 4, 1921 for a contemporary account. Congress did not adjourn until "just before noon" March 4. (This was the legislative day of March 3.) Septentrionalis 23:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: March 4, 1921
Talk:Varanasi

message: It should be Hinduism and not Hindu Mythology. There are three instances in this article where "Hindu Mythology" has been used. These are real places and gods that lived in this world in the past and thus it's not right to call this a Myth. VM0717 (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. M.Bitton (talk) 00:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Google what mythology means before you comment this sort of gibberish.  Chronikhiles (talk)  06:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2024 

message: The infobox contains people rather than important places. I suggest removing people form the infobox and replacing it with important landmarks. SKAG123 (talk) 22:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean the "infobox contained [pictures of] people rather than [pictures of] important places".  This was discussed previously, see :Talk:Varanasi/Archive 2#Infobox images need change for representation. Consensus appeared to be to use the pictures we have now.-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing people form the infobox
Talk:Rustie Lee

message: From what I remember years ago, didn't her time at that program ended with her being sacked because of some endorsement of table salt that breached broadcasting rules. That was headline news in The Sun. This is the only source I can get hold of. Donnie Park (talk) 12:38, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rustie Lee and TV-am 

message: She She appears to have been born in 1949, 1950 AND 1953!Bashereyre (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year

message: Appeared in Celebrity Weakest Link Dec 28th 2022 BBC1. Percy2345 (talk) 23:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celebrity Weakest Link Dec 28th 2022
Talk:Erik S. Reinert

message: * University of Oslo reference on Erik Reinert
* Evoloutionary Economics - The Other Canon
* University of Oslo - Centre for Development and the Environment
* Tallinn University of Technology
:What precisely does "alternative text" mean?  It should be intregrated with the article, to the extent that this is possible.  "The Other Canon" should get its own entry, and the remarks on evolutionary economics should go into the respective article.  This is a biographical page, after all.  Finally, I would contest that objectively speaking, Reinert is simply, or even mainly, an "evolutionary economist", although a reference is of course appropriate. Clossius 06:00, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  External References
Talk:Ndwandwe–Zulu War

message: This page should be titled Zulu-Nwande War, not Zulu civil war, ass this last almost almost always refers to the wars between different factions within Zululand in the 1880s, arising out the British imposed settlement after the war of 1879
Jdorney 20:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Wizzy…☎ 20:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad title 

message: I believe King Chaka introduced the stabbing spear called the iklwa (named after the sound it made when pulled from the body of a victim) and not the assegai. The light throwing javelin was reportedly detested by Chaka, plus the assegai had been around long before Chaka or even the zulu clan.  I won't edit this myself, as I haven't procured any sources at the moment, but I strongly suggest fixing this article.
HOLLA
Scott Free 22:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iklwa not assegai 

message: Sources/references would be nice. Also, if you don't have data for troop numbers or casualties, you can leave those elements blank, and the rows won't appear on the infobox at all. It's not a rule, but a generally followed guideline, I think. LordAmeth 21:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: Shaka 169.239.209.12 (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Template talk:Nationality by occupation

message: I don't see any reason to sort in this way rather than this way. We are well beyond the stage where by-occupation categories need to be set apart from the others that will be in every "FOOian people" category. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Category sorting

message: Can someone who understands this template please adjust it on :Category:Akan people by occupation so that it no longer appears in :Category:Akan people? Timrollpickering (talk) 10:32, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Akan people by occupation 

message: I found some linty markup at :Category:People from the Republic of Genoa by occupation that resulted from an empty Nationality parameter, and I copied and expanded the markup to :Category:Sandbox/Lint, where the error behavior and its workaround can be seen. The template should be modified to behave gracefully on an empty Nationality parameter, and I put in the Goose example as well to spotlight that to someone who doesn't already know what's going on, usage is not explained very well. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed the template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error behavior
Talk:Misha

message: Only the coolest girl in the world, ever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.221.0.178 (talk • contribs) 
Misha is not a girl, if that´s what you mean. However, Misha is the best olympic mascot ever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.24.216.10 (talk • contribs) 
I used to read the magazine when I was a kid - any links to their publication house? I wonder if they are still in business. The last issue I saw of Misha magazine was in 1987. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.74.241 (talk • contribs) 
For me, the section "Origines of the name Misha" has nothing to do with the subject of the article. I think, it should be deleted or moved somewhere else--83.237.108.148 05:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This bear goes by "Olympic mishka". Not "Mishka" with capital, not "Misha" or "misha", cz it's not a name. The fact that term mishka meaning bear is somehow related to name Mikhail/Mishka/Misha is totally irrelevant in context of Olympic mishka (read Olympic bear). Olympic bear doesnt have a name, so article shuld be name "Olympic mishka", not "Misha" or "Mishka".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.21.11.95 (talk) 21:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WestJet

message: Where would be the best place in the article to mention WestJet Rewards and their upcoming program with RBC, Ampli? Daylen (talk) 03:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not Wikipedia policy to provide free advertising to corporations. Per WP:SOAP Mediatech492 (talk) 03:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loyalty programs 

message: I've noticed a few problems with this airline page that makes it a bit different from other airline pages: 
# In-Flight Services & Cabins: This section is downright excessive and unnecessarily long, written in a fairly passive but still promotional feel. This needs to be reviewed.
{Cjstepney (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern over Marketing-Style of Writing 