Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Missouri/Archive 1

message: I have added the Project template on MO highways 1-141 and a handful of scattered others so far.Rt66lt 03:07, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comments

message: Since the original image for the stub template is gone, I went ahead and replaced it with the same picture on the template for the WikiProject itself.  I'm assuming the original was a sign with no numbers in it, which would probably be better; but the template looks strange with the image missing.  If the original image can be found, please feel free to change it.  Rt66lt 23:31, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub Image

message: I'm having some trouble getting an example of the new box on the page (it messes up the page).  If anybody can get it in and keep the page straight, please do!Rt66lt 04:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Route box example

message: All of the new routeboxes have been put in on all the current highways.  I have created one for Missouri State Highway 66 (decommissioned) with the old cut-out style markers.  The image looks kind of small, so I'll probably change it.
I also changed the list of US and interstate highways on List of Missouri highways.  It now has tables with the locations where the highways enter and leave Missouri and their lengths in the state.Rt66lt 00:15, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Routeboxes

message: I have just created Portal:U.S. Roads.  If you have any feedback, please place it under "Portal" at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads.Rt66lt 03:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Portal

message: I just discovered that Template:MORoutebox was missing a close-table wikicode tag. I fixed it, but the template had all sorts of "see Wikiproject etc." notes so I figured I'd mention it here in case it's something that needs fixing elsewhere as well. Bryan 05:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed a routebox, do others need fixing? 

message: Due to the recent conversations regarding state highway/route/etc. naming conventions I want to bring this up:
Does anyone have an objection to the current naming convention for Missouri highways, i.e., "Missouri State Highway 1"?  I'm not trying to stir up a hornet's nest, but I would like to see what everybody thinks before it turns into something.  
I realize that MoDOT uses "Route 1", etc.; however, doing some research, I can't find any legal definition for their names.  State statutes actually use both terms "Highway 141" and "Route 141" for the same road, but they lean (heavily) towards "highway".  Most, but not all, "routes" either refer to postal address (such as Route 2, Box 5) or to Route 66.  The common useage, at least in southwest Missouri, is "Highway X", not "Route X" except for Route 66 (as in the famous highway, not Missouri 66 - interstingly, "Route" is usually pronounced to rhyme with "doubt", except for 66, where it rhymes with "boot").
As for "Missouri State Highway 66" vs. "State Highway 66 (Missouri)", I really don't see a difference.  In the first case, Missouri is an adjective, describing the state highway, and the other parenthetical.
To sum it all up, I think they should stay as they are.  Any comments?Rt66lt 01:31, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the St. Louis area, most of the state highways are called by their local names, with a notable exception (that I can think of offhand) being Missouri State Highway 141, which is normally called "141", or sometimes "Highway 141". I personally don't like "Route X" and I don't think I hear it used, but I just might not be paying attention. To confuse things further, though, I've heard some older and rural residents say "X Highway", with the number first. I think that usage is fading. Overall, I don't see a problem with the current naming system. Ardric47 02:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: Are the specs for route shields readily available for creating shields for the articles and infoboxes? If so, I'm sure User:SPUI would be willing to create a whole bunch of SVG shields based on the specs. Plus I think a few Illinois routes end at Missouri state routes; see Wikipedia:WikiProject Illinois State Routes for more. —Rob (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Truth be told, I'm not sure what the specs are for the highways shields in Missouri are.  I found one made by somebody else and modified it.  I think I used "Blue Highway" as the font.Rt66lt 00:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The specs  ...Scott5114 09:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The state route shields are done (thanks, Vishwin60!)... all except for one. I tried to make a few on my own, and they looked fine when I saved them, but when I uploaded the image for Route 763, it was painfully evident that I'd done something wrong. Could someone please fix this? Skitters 05:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 05:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missouri shields 

message: What about the letter-designated state roads, which are of a secondary nature, i.e., "State Road X".  Are there still such?  There used to be many of them.  If still, should they be addressed and if so, how? Rlquall 20:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are "supplementary routes", and are handled at Missouri Supplemental Route. We don't need an article for each one (see the project page)...Scott5114 09:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  State ''Roads'' 

message: Your state is invited to participate in discussions for its highway naming convention. Please feel free to participate in this discussion. If you already have a convention that follows the State Name Type xx designation, it is possible to request an exemption as well. Thanks! --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)  00:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll/Part2]]

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 22:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Please note that the infobox template has just changed.  It is now based on .  Please fix any broken infoboxes ASAP!  Good-practice infoboxes are located at Missouri Route 9 and Missouri Route 115.  Thanks! V60 VTalk - VDemolitions 22:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox update 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 16:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: As it stands now there is a category dedicated to decommissioned Missouri Highways, with 52 articles.  It is all located at Category:Decommissioned Missouri state highways.  I do not see the notability of any of them and am looking into deleting them, although it does look like some could be redirected to whatever the current route is.  (Many are current US Highways.)  So do we eliminate all of them, or try to merge as many as possible? DandyDan2007 22:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've also posted this at WT:N/HWY. DandyDan2007 22:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decommissioned Missouri Highways 

message: All of the USRD Clean-up Templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master sonT - C 16:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of All USRD Clean-up Templates

message: In response to a few issues that came up, we are giving a reminder to all state highway wikiprojects and task forces:
# Each project needs to remain aware of developments at WT:USRD and subpages to ensure that each project is aware of decisions / discussions that affect that project. It is impossible to notify every single project about every single discussion that may affect it. Therefore, it is the state highway wikiproject's responsiblity to monitor discussions.
# If a project does not remain aware of such developments and complains later, then there is most likely nothing USRD can do about it.
# USRD, in most to nearly all cases, will not interfere with a properly functioning state highway wikiproject. All projects currently existing are "properly functioning" for the purposes mentioned here. All task forces currently existing are not "properly functioning" (that is why they are task forces). Departments of USRD (for example, MTF, shields, assessment, INNA) may have specific requirements for the state highway wikiprojects, but complaints regarding those need to be taken up with those departments.
# However, this is a reminder that USRD standards need to be followed by the state highway wikiprojects, regardless of the age of the wikiproject.
Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 05:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reminder from USRD

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Short notice, I know, but if you are in town and interested in coming tomorrow evening, you're more than welcome.--Chaser (talk) 21:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Meetup/St. Louis]] 

message: There is currently a discussion taking place at WT:HWY regarding the potential use of coordinates in highway articles. Your input is welcomed. --Rschen7754 01:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC on coordinates in highway articles