lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Verticordia nitens

message: I just cut this bit for now
Powdery mildew is a problem in cooler weather or where air movement is poor.  V. nitens does not like a high level of nutrition, it grows in impoverished sand and a good level of soil aeration is important.
Apologies. The new ref discusses fine leaved verticordia, but is not 'specific'. George gives extensive cultivation notes, it requires a bit of work to weave them in; she makes much of moisture content and rainfall, general notes will probably discuss this. cygnis insignis 17:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  expansion
Talk:Representative agent

message: Much of the motivation given here for assuming a 'representative agent' is actually motivation for constructing 'microfoundations'. In particular, the Lucas critique called for microfoundations. Assuming a representative agent is one way of simplifying the construction of microfoundations, but it shouldn't be equated with the construction of microfoundations. The article needs some rewriting to make this distinction clearer. --Rinconsoleao 08:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done some rewriting to disentangle the 'representative agent' concept from the 'microfoundations' concept. A section on conditions for the existence of a representative agent could be useful too. Rinconsoleao (talk) 10:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Representative agent' is not equivalent to 'microfoundations'

message: This page on representative agents includes a link to 'Heterogeneous agent', but it's a lousy link that goes to the disambiguation page for Heterogeneity, where the only link available under economics is one very loosely related econometrics link, Study heterogeneity. We need to develop a proper article on heterogeneous agents in economics, which could then be reached from the Heterogeneity page.
Exactly what the title should be is not clear. Possibilities include:
* Heterogeneous agents
* Heterogeneous agent models
* Heterogeneous agents in economics
* Heterogeneous agent models in economics
* Heterogeneous agents in macroeconomics
* Heterogeneous agent models in macroeconomics
* Heterogeneity in economics
Personally I would favor the third suggestion: 'Heterogeneous agents in economics'. Alternatively, 'Heterogeneity in economics', which could either be a separate page from 'Heterogeneity in econometrics', or might include it as a subtopic. Rinconsoleao (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Heterogeneous agents' article needed
Talk:Active sitting

message: This article is written as an essay advocating for active sitting. It is way too detailed as it makes its case. Though it is sourced, there are few inline citations, leading me to suppose there could be a great deal of original research and WP:synthesis here. Finally, a lot of it is stated in terms of the current state of the field, but it was written five years ago or more, which means it is outdated anyway, unless this has been a dormant field of research during the years since then. Largoplazo (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The state of the article, December 2016
Talk:George Soros/Archive 6

message: Please change the link in the second paragraph of the Biography section from Hungarian to Hungarian. Thanks! --Milton 07:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the second looks the same, but it is actually a link to Hungarian language. Sorry if that caused any confusion. Milton 07:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks much! --Milton 20:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit
Talk:University of Siena

message: Hi, The final section of this page appears to have been copied verbatim from http://www.unisi.it/english/cittacampus_en.htm (which I found by googling for a quoted bit). I'm not sure whether copyright law allows this, but frankly I don't believe its contents are something which belong on the page anyway. "Siena’s campus is the city. The academy lives as an integral part of the urban fabric in both space and time.", anyone?!
I don't want to just rip the stuff out, but don't know enough to be able to say anything useful here, and I suspect that looking up information to help is impossible unless one speaks Italian (which I don't!) So if anyone can fix it, that would be wonderful!
Anyhow, I think the copyedit bit is done, so I'm going to remove the banner,
Rswarbrick (talk) 22:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Worryingly promotional final section

message: I am going to study this unversity 185.213.230.101 (talk) 09:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economy
Talk:University of Pisa

message: I have selected this entry to copyedit for a Professional Editing class. Please leave this entry unedited for the next two weeks as I work on my assignment.
:Last update was in 2012. Anyone is free to do more copyediting now.--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit?
Talk:University of Pécs

message: What does the university motto "Universitas Quinqueecclesiensis" means? Writing the English meaning of the motto would be helpful and appreciated. As I know 'universitas' means university, 'quinque' five, and 'ecclesiastic' ecclesiastical. FonsScientiae (talk) 14:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Universitas Quinqueecclesiensis
Talk:University of Zadar

message: I checked three of the most comprehensive and widely consulted compendiums on the history of the university in Europe and I found none listing a university in Zadar before 1945. My guess is someone confused the status of the Dominican school which I take existed there since 1396 with that of an university which provides lectures and learning on a much higher level. catholic universities needed the approval of the pope by a bull or brief, as well as of the king or emperor, to be recognized as such, but I don't see any evidence for that. Therefore I remove the claim. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status as medieval university unproven
Talk:Perna viridis

message: The photo in the Description Section is probably misidentified.  This photo is more likely an image of the congener Perna canaliculus, or green-lipped mussel.  Most Perna viridis specimens are completely or mostly green in the external periostracum rather than just the shell margin, and the shell interior is more iridescent than the shells of P. canaliculus.  The image in the infobox is correct. Innapoy (talk) 18:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo Identification
Talk:The Complete Idiot's Guide to Publishing Science Fiction

message: This book does not seem to merit a page. It is not notable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nexus501 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

message: Per the above and considering that this article hasn’t been deleted in the intervening twelve years, I have proposed merging it with Complete Idiot's Guides—or with the target of a proposed merge of that page, Alpha Books. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 15:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion
Talk:Northeast College of Health Sciences

message: I have removed the sentence "The except tot eh classrooms and library being at the Rochester Clinic." If someone else knows what it was meant to mean and can restore it without use of the words tot and eh then please do so. ϢereSpielChequers 13:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  tot
Talk:Ashig Alasgar

message: Erivan Khanate existed until 1828 (see Wiki Page on Khanate of Erevan). When Alasgar was born (1821) Khanate existed. So we have to use the toponymes according to the time of the event. 
The region was called Gokcha (please see the map in the article Khanate of Erevan). 
Since the village was a predominantly Azerbaijani settlement, it is also correct when we use its Azerbaijani name with Azerbaijani alphabet (which is a variant of Latin).   
Zod1981 (talk) 19:44, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is correct to use the name of the settlement and its location used at the time of his birth, but it is not correct to spell it using the modern Azerbaijan alphabet: the village is not in the republic of Azerbaijan, and this is not the Azeri-language Wikipedia. And an "Azerbaijani" is a citizen of Azerbaijan. Meowy 16:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New York Times Sunday Review of Books

message: I feel confident that this is the same as the The New York Times Book Review. See, for example the page of back issues from the New York Times site which uses both names on the same page: http://www.nytimes.com/ref/books/review/br-back-issues.html
I suggest these pages be merged.
Mr. Kalish (talk) 14:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Isn't this the The New York Times Book Review?
Talk:Prepaid telephone call

message: As in Telecommunications rating, the article would be better titled 'Prepaid telecommunications calls'.--Ethnicstage 09:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  Prepaid telephone call in the normal, common term. Nobody would ever say "Prepaid telecommunications call". Abd if they did, you would laugh at them.  --Senator2029 “Talk” 21:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Retitle
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Dalmatia/Evidence

message: Hope I'm not too late with my contributions from today. However, these don't change picture, they point even more to the fact that Giove ignores communication, ignores sources provided by opponents, besides ordinary vandal behaviour like edit-warring (violation of 3RR etc.). 
This is important, because, after the expiry of block, Giove might start avoid edit-warring or 3RR violations, but the problem of ignorance'll stay.
Arbitrators, please, have that in mind. Kubura 09:58, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by Kubura 

message: Please, keep the /Evidence page from adding the content that isn't supposed to be there. 
Wikipedia is not a childish thing. 
Here won't work "spit at someone, than lick it, and go further like nothing happened". Ne more se pjunit pa polizat. Kubura 07:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A request to arbitrators
Talk:Vicenza American High School

message: A few IPs (at least one Geolocating to the school itself) has been adding the football team starting lineup to the article. Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI, this is not appropriate. Students shouldn't be named unless there is good reason, and being on a sports team doesn't achieve this. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 11:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting lineup
Talk:Soft tissue therapy

message: This article was nominated for deletion and the result of that discussion (which I was not involved in) was to merge it with Manual therapy. I'm going to make that happen in the next day or two and take the opportunity to improve the other article as well. Rap Chart Mike (talk) 19:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed and update of the Manual therapy page is in process. Rap Chart Mike (talk) 14:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge work
Talk:Kiriburu

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:107 mm divisional gun M1940 (M-60)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.  References for each paragraph would easily take this article to B class    --dashiellx (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I saw this needed a grammar rework, so I just did a bunch of fixes. Tricky_Wiki44 (talk) 21:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar Edits
Talk:Löwenzahn

message: The sentence "klingt komisch, ist aber so" is not used in Löwenzahn.
It's a sentence from a german parody of Löwenzahn, as you can read here http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Sendung_mit_der_Maus#Wissenswertes
217.87.80.236 10:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right. I deleted that part. --91.35.212.176 (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Calverley

message: Football wise it is said that half of the village supports Leeds United and the other half supports Bradford City due to the proximity of both cities, though most people in the village support Calverley United.
I can't honestly testify for the accuracy of this comment, as I don't know, and while I don't doubt Calverley has a mix because of its proximity, it seems a fairly unspecific and crude way of writing.Mtaylor848 (talk) 20:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was unsubstantiated, so I have removed it.Chemical Engineer (talk) 14:14, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Derby Silk Mill

message: I've added a section on Derby City Council's proposed mothballing of the museum; I've added references in the links section but can't work out how to link from within the text.  I'll have a read of the help pages and see if I can work out how to do this but if anyone else fancied doing it then "ta very much". --Bigyaks (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mothballing Edit 

message: I propose that Lombe's Mill be merged into Derby Silk Mill, as the two articles deal with essentially much the same topic. Although not technically the same building, the original mill having burned down, the present Silk Mill is a recreation of the original and on the same site, so they have a shared history. Indeed, there is a good deal of overlap between the articles already, as the history section for the current building also covers that of the previous mill. Neither article is particularly long, so combining the information from both would be quite manageable. Jellyman (talk) 11:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My view is that Lombe's Mill is vastly more important as a historical entity than the current Derby Silk Mill, a "museum for the 21st century incorporating the principles of Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics" in a recreated building. I would, however, move the contents of the history section to the mill page, leaving only the modern material at the Derby Silk Mill page, ensuring that the two pages are appropriately linked. Klbrain (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Material moved. Klbrain (talk) 21:19, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 
Talk:Therapeutic nihilism

message: The article has a lot of information and some good sources behind it, but it needs to be changed to fit wikipedia. The language and tone come more from a textbook than from a neutral source. This is the major critique I have for this article. The organization of the article seems sound, but consider dividing "history" into a few more pieces. It comes in distinct waves, especially in the 19th century, so maybe that is something that you would want to keep separate. A good start! Ccoope52 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Start

message: I read through your edits and I think it was a very good topic to discuss since it is was a very lacking wiki article before the edits. I think you did a great job in the History of Therapeutic Nihilism section however I would suggest improving the introduction to the section since I feel it sounds a bit awkward and it should have a broader scope. Additionally, I didn't feel that the Medicine section was properly titled and the information in that section would have been better in the history section. Overall, I thought you made very good contributions. BestNikkilopezsuarez (talk) 05:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Job!

message: The contention in this article that "therapeutic nihilim" has never been mainstream is absurd. It misses TN's defining role in modern conservatism, whose keystone tenet is that society's problems can't be solved, so laissez les bons temps rouler. This is the position of Edmund Burke ("unintended consequences") and Peter Viereck ("But I'm a Conservative!" in the Atlantic in April 1940) and the "free marketeers." The record in this article must be set straight.
Dstlascaux (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Whoa, Conservatism

message: It seems like therapeutic nihilism page has very minimal information regarding the topic. I intend to add 750~1000 words on the overall concept of therapeutic nihilism as well as history behind it. Please let me know!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhk0308 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing page
Talk:WWE Smackdown

message: Okay, this page is completely blank. Does anyone agree with deletion? Here are my reasons
*We probably have an article about it already. See WWE Friday Night SmackDown! for the television wrestling show, and WWE SmackDown! (video game series) for the video game based on it. Let this page be a redirect to one of them.
*The article is content-less.
Any objections? Please nominate it for deletion if you agree, I have no experience with that, and could mess it up.--Puchiko 11:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Akatsuki Blitzkampf

message: I think this article has some problems with natural language and style. I'm trying to fix it up a bit, but I've recently had a few of my changes reverted, while editing as 20.3.6.69.2.
I didn't add descriptions to those changes which is my bad, but I don't think any needed to reverted. I'll be continuing to make fixes, including redoing the reverts, with more description of my intent, so please reach out to me before reverting the changes again.
Thanks,
BardDrive (talk) 12:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style Improvements
File talk:Mini-14 bolt.jpg

message: I think we can improve upon this picture. --Haizum    μολὼν λαβέ 11:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free.--LWF 19:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean no offense - the picture is a bit blurry for its size. Unfortunately I do not have a Mini-14. --Haizum    μολὼν λαβέ 01:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely none taken. My digital camera is very compact, but the pictures are not of great quality. I intend to get a better camera but that could take a while. Anyone with a Mini-14 should feel free to take a picture with the bolt half open. That allows the best view of the operating mechanism.--LWF 02:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Blue Dragon Plus

message: I don't know how to flag an article as a spoiler but can someone flag this one? I came to see if Blue Dragon Plus was a prequel or sequel to blue dragon and ended up finding out that the planet core is opened at the end of Blue Dragon (which I am yet to complete) major spoiler for me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.64.166 (talk) 03:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler!!  

message: http://jeux-france.com/news23271_blue-dragon-plus-plus-d-images.html
These new scans seem to suggest the game will take place directly after Blue Dragon. Can anyone read it and confirm? JesseMeza (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct sequel?  

message: Blue Dragon Plus is a separate distinct game so there is no reason to merge it with Blue Dragon or Blue Dragon 2 the resulting article would be to large a no god can come of that.
I suggest a page for the entire series with  a little information about every game (like a short summary) and that links to every individual game page.IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: merge removed because no one supported the merge--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  oppose merge 

message: Well, in the article there is this image as the boxart. Despite that, there is another boxart, this one. Does somebody know which is the difference between these two? GosBoig (talk) 18:26, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boxart 
Talk:Dongui Bogam

message: What does the title mean? How would you translate the title into English? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.11.161 (talk • contribs) 2009-03-14T18:11:30 (UTC)
What is the best date to use for its completion or publication? I have seen one reliable source that gives this date as 1613 A.D.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 2009-03-14T18:13:44 (talk • contribs) 2009-03-14T18:11:30 (UTC)
:The title means "Mirror of Eastern Medicine" and the book was published in 1613 three years after the completion was finished.--Caspian blue 20:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: I've added some text and references.
Please verify if my English is correct and coherent. --86.127.134.238 (talk) 14:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits 
Talk:SOCRATES

message: I think this
curprev 10:58, 17 July 2014‎ J Milburn talk contribs‎  67 bytes -68‎  Just because someone's searching for blockcaps, doesn't mean they aren't looking for Socrates undo
is a mistake and this page should redirect to Socrates programme as originally intended. 2001:4C4C:1AB2:9300:0:0:0:1 (talk) 20:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Socrates programme
Talk:Grenz infantry

message: Maybe you should mention, that 'Grenze' is German for border. So 'Grenzer' means something like border guard. I couldn't find this in the text.
188.98.109.3 (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  --A D Monroe III(talk)  14:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grenze = border
Talk:Spondon railway station

message: We do not need . Despite the claim "The machine is a feature of the station and is mentioned in the article" in the edit summary, similar machines are found at many stations and the image adds little to the reader's understanding of the main topic, that of Spondon railway station; and the only mention of the machine in the article is in the last sentence of the lead section, which says nothing beyond the fact that the station has such a machine. Apart from the alleged vandalised state, is this particular machine unique in some way? I really don't think so. Even if the image is encyclopedic, it is oversized (see WP:IMGSIZE), the caption is way too long (see MOS:CAPTION), is not neutral (see WP:NPOV) and not supported by a reference (see WP:V). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of PERTIS machine 

message: I find this section very confusing. It says that the service frequency is 1 tph to Matlock and 1 tph to Nottingham via Derby. This doesn't matter sense because Derby and Nottingham are in opposite directions. If the implication is that there are no eastbound services from this station then it should say so. If the implication is that there are no services at present because of the replacement bus service between the station and Derby, mentioned but not cited later in the section, then there should be a clarification. 87.75.117.183 (talk) 21:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Services section
Talk:Agada

message: Hello, my friends: A group of us are working on clearing the backlog at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_lacking_sources_from_October_2006. The article in the above header has been without sources for the past four years and may be removed if none are added. I wonder if you can help do so. Sincerely, and all the best to you, GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Agada]]