lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hushpuppy

message: Speaking as a person who came looking to find out what Hushpuppies actually are, this article is almost no help.  What does "savory starch based food" even mean?
Can someone who has eaten one perhaps describe them a little?  --xurble (talk) 07:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are they? 

message: Yes the old image was blurry. Can some one make a replacement, preferably when you have lunch at a fish place. Whitebox 10:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait about a month.  Hopefully, I'll have a digital camera and a trip to Long John Silver's.--BigMac1212 22:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Hushpuppies 

message: Hi, OED doesn't give any etymology for Hush Puppies.  Should we mention this in the article?
I have to say that the etymologies provided smack of folk etymologies.  It's not very convincing that those deep-fried cornmeal dumplings originated as convenient dogfood.  That would be about the most extravagant dogfood imaginable (except maybe sushi). Maikel (talk) 09:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It says 1899, and I added it.TuckerResearch (talk) 05:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

text: Ingenious! Especially for a non-native English speaker. Your etymology may well be true, or at least, very close to the truth. 'Hush-puppy' seems like a case of Hobson-Jobson to me.121.44.176.153 (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia wants cited independent statements, not ingenuity. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 13:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Just a small question, should I add some details about Puerto Rico's own version of a hushpuppy? I know their sweetness are popular to young children, but the "" are also popular among some adults. JMBZ-12 (talk) 23:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorullitos

message: The name of a charactor in the movie, Beasts of the Southern Wild, directed by Benh Zeieltlin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackbfly (talk • contribs) 15:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hush Puppy 

message: This is an interesting link that breaks the topic into folklore and history with quotes from various periodicals. I don’t know if it would help, but it certainly convinced me that some of the stories seem like folklore.
https://www.seriouseats.com/real-history-myths-hushpuppies  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.76.12.168 (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical context of red horse bread
Talk:Quickswitch

message: Quickswitch (Transformers) → Quickswitch — A brief reason as to why the name of the page should be changed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.94.249.50 (talk) 05:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . Jafeluv (talk) 06:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:The Link (retailer)

message: Had to remove the stuff about staff in Liverpool not having a job anymore. I know it sucks.. we're all in the same boat to a lesser or greater extent, but there's no point complaining about it on here.Matt.smart 11:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links
Talk:Isoquant

message: what is ythe difference between output expansion path and income consumption curve.80.255.50.66 11:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Meaning type and properties 2409:4040:E98:B91F:5DEE:4A68:485C:EB03 (talk) 12:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isoquants
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Viridae 2

message: Suspended support awaiting further discussion and answer to questions, but I'd like to see evidence that the user has a full range of Wikipedia experiences - his contributions show a large concentration in RC patrolling and votes for deletion. --Robdurbar 12:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than filling up the RfA, I am aswering this one here. Most of my activity does centre around XfDs and RC patrol, from this I have gained a lot of experience dealing with other users. I also enjoy the debate side of XfDs. My encyclopedic concentrations have been limited for a couple of reasons. The first being uni - writing a properly referenced article in my field requires a lot of time and effort. Secondly I  tend to find that when I think of a topic to write about or expand, there is already a worthwhile article for it. As I stated in my answers to the questions, as I become more knowedgable in the field I will (hopefully) be doing honours in, I will be more able to write a quality article. Writing about science is not easy, translating journal articles to plain english takes time and a thorough knowedge of the topic - something which I dont always have. ViridaeTalk 13:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Thankyou to all those who participated in this RfA, I hope I can by an admin up to all your standards. I am not going to spam you all, as it just fill up your userpage. Thankyou again. If you ever need something done or see me screwing something up - don't hesitate to say something. ViridaeTalk 07:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thankyou
Talk:Kaoru Genji

message: Kaoru Genji is too weird.
1) It is not a convention to reverse the original name order for ancient people.
2) and more over "Genji" is not surname. It is a conventional name for his clan, and never combined with given name. He could be Minamoto no [xxxx, not given in the book - Kaoru is a nickname], but never "Kaoru Genji" as far as I understand. So I think this article should be renamed as just "Kaoru". In the text he is always referred as Kaoru or Kaoru no kimi. Not Kaoru Genji.   
Or is there any convention to call him in this way in English translation, even it sounds strange? --Aphaia 04:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Move 

message: I removed a sentence which has incorrect information about Kaoru that mistakes him for his father, Hikaru Genji. It was Hikaru who committed adultery with his step-mom, not Kaoru. Kaoru loves Ukifune. Also, I polished some sentences. Ronaa22 (talk) 01:33, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed incorrect information and polished some sentences in the lead 

message: I added a characteristics section for the article. Polished some sentences in the lead. Ronaa22 (talk) 02:38, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a Characteristics section 

message: For the literary context section, I'm not sure how to redirect to the page of the literary context that's already in the Tale of Genji Wikipedia article... Please look at it thank you. Ronaa22 (talk) 01:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Development, Literary Context, Analysis sections and references
Talk:The light on the hill

message: The Chifley Centre did not write the speech. Perhaps someone can guide me here - the speech was delivered (and one presumes written) by Ben Chifley, who died 55 years ago. That means the copyright has expired - correct? Joestella 12:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: This is mostly a note to myself - start an article about The forgotten people  speech and the Tenterfield Address. Joestella 18:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Forgotten people

message: Party]] --Quoth nevermore (talk) 00:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. Timeshift (talk) 06:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move the speech to wikisource and merge the rest of the article to the [[Australian Labor 

message: As far as I can see, the 'hill' in the speech cannot possibly be a reference to Capital Hill (and hence parliament), as claimed in the article. Two reasons: firstly, Chifley explicitly states in the sentence before the hill reference that the labour movement's objective is not simply "making somebody Prime Minister or Premier", but that its objective is the betterment of the people. It hardly makes sense for him to say this and then state, at the crescendo of the speech, that the great and high objective of the labour movement is gaining control of parliament. Also, as the parliament was not located on Capital Hill in 1949, and wouldn't be for almost four decades, the interpretation of 'hill' as a reference to parliament is anachronistic in the extreme. The statement is also unreferenced, and receives no support from the essay on the speech in the external links, so I've removed the sentence from the article and have put it here for future reference.
*The "hill" may be a reference to Capital Hill in the centre of Canberra, Australia's capital city. The hill is today the site of the country's Parliament House.
--Nasica (talk) 01:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a hidden attack on Chifley contained in that post nasica? I hope you're not POV-pushing... :)  Timeshift (talk) 02:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Capital Hill?
Talk:Crying Song

message: I took the liberty of changing G sharp to A flat, which is the actual diminished fifth of D. G sharp is the augmented fourth.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.78.217.242 (talk) 11:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  G sharp/A flat 

message: I chaged the genre from Psychedelic rock to Folk rock, like this source says http://www.pinkfloydonline.com/discography/more/.
What the others of wikipedians think?
--Italodal (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to state your verifiable references... propose genre changes on the talk page (not declare them)... and wait for discussion and consensus before tampering with the genre field of any article on Wikipedia. Your link failS WP:RS The Real Libs-speak politely 18:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

text: I have seen some of your other proposals for changing genres in songs from this album, and while others are questionable, I think your proposal is good for this one. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Compact sport utility vehicle

message: I propose to merge Compact sport utility vehicle into Sport utility vehicle. Given the sometimes blurry distinction between sizes of SUVs (including different countries classifying the same vehicle into different size categories), I think it would be easier to put Compact SUVs into perspective if they are included in the SUV article. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 08:04, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer to leave them separate. An SUV has a lot of luxury trim but is still a fully capable off-road vehicle. A crossover looks like an SUV but drives like a family car and is not really off-road capable. They look similar but drive completely differently.  Stepho  talk  20:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi Stepho. Just to clarify, this is just about the smaller size of separate chassis SUVs (eg Bronco II, S-10 Blazer, Vitara). I agree with maintaining separation to the crossovers, and think this won't be affected by the merger. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 22:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Point taken. I suggest that the article should take pains to point out the difference between CUV (compact but still capable off-road SUVs) and CUV (crossover, really just tall wagons) because some fools mix them up.  Stepho  talk  07:58, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Indeed. Putting taller springs in say a Toyota Yaris does not make for an SUV! Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 23:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  But taller springs, a roof rack and chunky (black) wheel arch extensions does - at least for the marketing department :(  Stepho  talk  00:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  That seems like a good example of why we shouldn't be beholden to the whims of marketing departments! 1292simon (talk) 12:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Totally agree.  Stepho  talk  20:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Category talk:Haunted house films

message: I recently created the category Ghost films Ghost films.  Obviously these two categories are related- which should be the parent of which?  I was thinking that Ghost films should parent Haunted House films, but feel free to disagree.  -Elizabennet 22:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say haunted house can be part of ghost films, as not all films with ghosts are based on the haunted house aspect (like...the film Ghost itself!), but then again, i haven't seen all of these yet, but do all Haunted House films have ghosts? Do we count ones what only "suggest the idea" of ghosts like The Haunting or The Innocents? Andrzejbanas 09:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost films
Talk:List of bus garages in London

message: I reckon this would look better and be more usable as one sortable wikitable... Railwayfan2005 (talk) 08:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but I don't have time to do it myself. Could anyone else do it? Thanks, The boss 1998 (talk) 06:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  One table? 
Talk:Stanley Nantais

message: I tried to find some confirmation that Stanley Nantais actually participated Games in Berlin, however:
* Official website of the Olympic Movement does not mention Nantais as a member of a Canadian basketball team (use this search engine)
* In Official report of the 1936 Summer Olympics his name is also not listed!
Therefore I conclude that there must be some mistake in sources mentioned in article.
--Ivelimir 12:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He was a member of the team and travelled to Berlin, but he did not play and was not awarded with a medal. Doma-w (talk) 01:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nantais at the [[1936 Summer Olympics]]
Talk:Alfa Romeo 155

message: Does anyone have any idea what this is referring to? Dino246 12:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "coolest" crash in BTCC of all times? 

message: Is the "Tipo B" another name for Tempra? Because the 155 shares a lot of it's design and parts including the floor pan, suspension, and even windows with the Tempra.
:I have never heard of any Tipo B, but the floorpan is originally from Tipo, 155 and Tempra has different body plates,brakes,engines and suspension setup differs also. Same is whisbones, hinges and doors inner structure.--— Typ932T | C  07:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tipo B? 

message: 155 DTM photo would be nice --— Typ932T | C  20:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  155 V6 TI picture 

message: It appears to me that large portions of the text here have been lifted verbatim from http://www.netcarshow.com/alfa_romeo/1993-155_2.5_v6_ti_dtm/
142.20.207.32 (talk) 19:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia.   --— Typ932T | C  20:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright? 

message: I changed the weight in the info box from 1204-1400 kg to 1195-143 kg. These figures are based on a 1995 Alfa 155 product brochure. This brochure is for the 2nd 155 series. The lightest of these series is the 1.7 8v (1195kg) and the heaviest is the Q4 (1430 kg). I do not know however, the weights of the first 155 series. The 1.7 8v version of the first series might even be lighter. So this has to be checked out! -- Marvin Raaijmakers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.81.28.30 (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Weight

message: I'm pretty sure that the DTM style kit on this 155 in the article is aftermarket, but just wanted to make sure before I remove it.   TKOIII (talk) 20:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  DTM kitted 155
Talk:Bergen raises

message: I created the example by randomly throwing cards around, then post-analysing them; if anyone has a more succinct idea please improve it. Also, I'm not so positive that N-S can always make 4 if the defense can manage to lead trumps frequently enough; the declarer might come short either on 2 club ruffs on the table or 3 diamond ruffs in hand. Plus, some finesse involved in the example is welcome (on the principle that if it's onside, it increases the LTC for one side but decreases for the other and vice versa). Also, few words on "adjustments" as described by Bergen & Cohen would be welcome (double fit increases, middle honors and wasted values decrease etc.) Duja► 12:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Check please
Talk:Stan Douglas

message: @Freshacconci I would suggest also mentioning which galleries represent Stan Dougles: Victoria Miro, David Zwirner 1-ona (talk) 15:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

message: This article needs lots of work for such an important artist, but let's stay away from the flowery writing. I'm going to work a bit on this at any rate. Freshacconci 12:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've started work on this. It's a long time coming, given Douglas' stature. I haven't had time to focus on it, but maybe in a couple of days. Freshacconci 21:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this article 
Talk:Spybreak!

message: I thought it was used in 'Tomorrow Never Dies', not 'The Matrix'
: It might have been used in 'Tomorrow Never Dies' too, I don't know about that. But the track is probably most famous for the lobby scene from 'The Matrix'. --84.227.217.16 11:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They onbly made one album ever. It may be their third single.208.79.244.67 (talk) 22:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Choa Chu Kang Park

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20120315155959/http://www.nparks.gov.sg/cms/index.php?option=com_visitorsguide&task=parks&id=12&Itemid=75. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 01:41, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lunar Orbiter program

message: I couldn't find much in the article discussing the launches of these missions. (What vehicles were used, etc.) I also couldn't find much about the maneuvers used to get from Earth into orbit around the Moon. Both of these seem reasonable to expect in a class=B article, so since they're absent this looks more like a class=C article.... (sdsds - talk) 21:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Areas article does not cover 

message: Which areas of the moon was Lunar Orbiter not able to photograph? Why?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.242.199 (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing 1% 

message: I am busy translating this article to Afrikaans on the Afrikaans Wikipedia. I am battling with this sentence:The resulting outstanding views were of generally very high spatial resolution and covered a substantial portion of the lunar surface, but they suffered from a “venetian blind” striping, missing or duplicated data, and frequent saturation effects that hampered their use.
The views referred to: is it the actual picture? Regards. Oesjaar (talk) 09:53, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle to translate...
Talk:Gardens by the Bay

message: On the bottom of this article there is the box FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE. Then under the section OTHER BUILDING the MARINA BARRAGE is still listed. Can someone remove MARINA BARRAGE from this list as this building was completed end of 2008. This is already updated on the article for this building. I don't know how to take this our there so I would neeed your help. Thanks! --Shorty23sin (talk) 05:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Developments 

message: * http://www.worldbuildingsdirectory.com/project.cfm?id=4410
* http://www.hortidaily.com/article/11471/Singapore-Gardens-by-the-Bay-is-the--Largest-Glass-Greenhouse-in-the-world
46.115.158.48 (talk) 12:50, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Building of the Year 2012 and Guinness World Records 2015 

message: I only skimmed the article but I can't see what was previously on this location. I see it's on reclaimed land but it was reclaimed thirty years ago while this development is only a couple of years old.
Adding such might be an improvement. — Hippietrail (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was here before? 

message: Could a section be added on the benefits of the garden on the urban environment and inhabitants of the surrounding community? I believe this was a major driver in the conversion of this land into this garden and I think it would be worthwhile to include. This garden is in the international spotlight and bringing its positive impacts on urban sustainability, the environment, and human health could be powerful for educating readers on the role this garden plays in those respects. The sustainability efforts are highlighted on the Gardens by the Bay website linked below 
https://www.gardensbythebay.com.sg/en/the-gardens/sustainability-efforts.html  
--Htaroli (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sustainability and Environmental Benefits
Talk:Mount Faber

message: I was reading the 24th Dec 2006's issue of "The New Paper Our Sunday" when an article (titled "What's the story behind Mystery Bunker?" on pages 8 & 9) caught my attention. The article was about a "hidden World War II bunker that is located less than 30m from the Seah Im Carpark" and the carpark is located near Mount Faber.  To understand more about this bunker, read the article. How about adding this bunker into the article? Aranho 08:13, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mystery Bunker 
Talk:Sengkang Sculpture Park

message: As part of a routine copy edit, I checked the "Reference" and found a Singaporean government website about the Housing Development Board.  There was no reference anywhere on the site to this or any other park, so I deleted the reference.  I followed the link to Sengkang, the area, and found no mention of this park.  It may be that information about the park was obtained from the Sengkang branch office of the housing development organization, but if so, it's not checkable according to the information provided (I found only an e-mail address).  If someone wants to provide a more accurate and checkable citation for this information, it would be welcomed.  Accounting4Taste 20:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal 
Talk:Anti-Stalinist left

message: Why is the scope "anti-Stalinist left" rather than just "anti-Stalinism"? Or what would the article lose for being scoped around general critiques (opposition) of Stalinism rather than "leftist" critiques? 
This article reads to me primarily as a summary style expansion from , a section that currently does not exist. Whatever is to be written in that parent section, this article should be a split, given the voluminous content. (Same for Leninism and Anti-Leninism.) czar 19:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The anti-Stalinist left is a specific thing whereas the generic "anti-Stalinism" would be too capacious a thing, and insufficiently different from anti-communism. BobFromBrockley (talk) 13:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope