lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brooks River Archeological District

message: Quite easy to verify. It's on page 50 of the DeLorme Alaska Atlas & Gazetteer, at coordinate B3. The site lies between Naknek Lake and Brooks Lake. The only part of Katmai National Park that is in Bristol Bay Borough is at the western end of Naknek Lake, which is NOT where the Brooks site is. Backspace (talk) 01:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Located in Lake and Peninsula Borough
Talk:Huckleberry Ridge Tuff

message: Ok first off Huckleberry Ridge isn't even the largest eruption in the last 2.5 million years never mind the last 30 Million years. First is Toba at 2800 Cubic Km which was 74,000 years ago. Then there was La Garita 26 Million years ago which was around twice the size of Huckleberry Ridge at 5000 Cubic km. So don't put this in without looking through all supervolcano related articles first.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.221.216 (talk) 21:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it depends on whose estimates for volume you use.  Lar Grarita has been revised downwards in recent years.  But you should provide a reference for your claims.  Also, I am sure if you go far back enough in geological time, the eruptions will get larger and larger.  It may not be very usful to compare erruptions of the last few million year to those of 30 million years ago.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metrodyne (talk • contribs) 00:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The size statements in this article ought to be consistent with the other articles on supervolcano events.  The list of largest volcanic eruptions lists several larger than the huckleberry ridge.174.51.110.214 (talk) 22:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Eruption Size
Talk:Texas statistical areas

message: The name has recently (Dec. 2009) changed for the Austin-Round Rock, TX MSA.  The Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area, and the newly formed Marble Falls, TX Micropolitan Statistical Area form the new Austin-Round Rock-Marble Falls, TX Combined Statistical Area.  The 2008 estimated population is 1,697,090.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.177.102.147 (talk) 00:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  21:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates
Talk:Halogen bond

message: In D-H...A and D-X...A inline schemes, D and A seem to be not an electron donor and an electron acceptor, respectively, as they are described as the opposite in the following text. Does this mean they are "donor" and "acceptor of hydrogen/halogen bond" (i. e., is this a kind of terminology specific for this type of bonding)? Then probably this should be noted in the article for not to confuse such dummies as me. Thanks for your comment in advance. --Esmu Igors (talk) 15:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where actually should be D and A in the inline scheme 

message: The exact text "In 1814, Jean-Jacques Colin described the formation of a liquid — with a metallic lustre — when he mixed together ammonia and iodine." was found on the description of the page http://www.nature.com/nchem/journal/v6/n9/full/nchem.2042.html?foxtrotcallback=true at Google. The edit is from this year and the Nature's articles was published 3 years ago.--190.55.2.97 (talk) 03:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 00:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation? 

message: In the article, I wrote that most halogen bonds are stronger than hydrogen bonds.  This is not exactly faithful to the sources, which say (repeatedly) that halogen bonds are weaker.  
Here's why I'm confused, and departed from the sources.  
Metrangolo et al "Hydrogen bonding in supramolecular chemistry" describes halogen bond strength  (see p. 3).  Unless there's an error in the paper, those aren't extreme values — they're typical ones.  
The examples given in  suggest that typical hydrogen bonds are ~, which is the low end of Metrangolo's range.  On the other hand, the same section also says that "those that are 15 to 40 kcal/mol, 5 to 15 kcal/mol, and >0 to 5 kcal/mol are considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively."  (Multiply by about 4 to get kJ/mol.)  This suggests that almost all the examples cited are weak hydrogen bonds, which would be poor practice on that article, if true.  
Also, halogen bonds are definitely more sensitive to direction.  If direction is roughly random, then the expected strength of a strong-but-sterically-sensitive bond is smaller than the expected strength of a moderate-but-sterically-insensitive bond.  Perhaps that's what the sources mean?  
It would be nice if somebody could clear this up.  Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 00:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strength? 
Talk:AC3D

message: Please don't delete!  This is a valid entry.  AC3D is software similar to 3ds Max, Lightwave etc and is referenced elsewhere in Wiki but (to my knowledge) there has never been a main entry for it.
Kinkybb (talk) 21:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The link you have for the file format specification is rather old (2003)
Here is a current specification: ac3d file format
--87.60.153.153 (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newer AC3D format
Talk:Utah statistical areas

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  21:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates
Talk:Vermont statistical areas

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  22:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates 

message: For some reason, the Berlin, New Hampshire micropolitan area is not on the table even though it's micropolitan area that takes up two counties (Coos County, New Hampshire and Essex County, Vermont). I would add this info myself, but I'm afraid of messing the table up. JCC the Alternate Historian (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berlin, New Hampshire micropolitan area
Talk:Washington (state) statistical areas

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  21:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates
File talk:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg

message: The clock should be vectorized.  Simply saving it as an svg does not remove pixelation.-- Thinboy00 talk/contribs @934, i.e. 21:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done - the clock image, as tested in my copy of Adobe Illustrator, appears to be fully vector, unless my sight somehow deceives me. I presume that the image was rather derived from :Image:Modern_clock_chris_kemps_01.svg instead of :Image:Modern_clock_chris_kemps_01.png. I have left a note on Hdt83's talk page asking about this. If it does turn out that the image used was the SVG rather than the PNG, then the reference on the page can be fixed to confirm that fact. Nihiltres{<t.<l} 22:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, sorry for the confusion. I used Image:Modern_clock_chris_kemps_01.svg and Image:Stop x nuvola.svg. The Stop x nuvola with clock.svg should be fully vector. --<Hdt<83    Chat 00:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vector Graphics

message: ::*More specifically, the file uses :File:Modern_clock_chris_kemps_01.svg and :File:Stop x nuvola.svg
::*NOT: :File:Modern_clock_chris_kemps_01.png and :File:Stop x nuvola.svg
<mechamind<9<0 06:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: Could you add the following text, before the ==Summary==:
Captaincollect1970 (talk) 02:45, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: and removed unnecessary protection template as well. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 14 June 2012 

message: This image could look better with the modern look because many computers have this look.  It looks cleaner than right now.  UpsandDowns1234 01:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More modern look 

message: Copy the code of :c:File: to fix the SVG errors. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 16:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Wisconsin statistical areas

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  22:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is Appleton, Wisconsin a metropolitan area, but not a Metropolitan Statistical Area, like all the others? Paploo (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates
Talk:Oxybeles

message: The only citation returns a 404.  New sources are needed.
71.191.38.245 (talk) 00:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

message: it is spelled oxyvelis and not oxybeles  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.72.101.175 (talk) 05:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  a notice 

message: Title 2601:40A:8300:3900:D9F1:927B:30CC:A5CC (talk) 06:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  So this was not "scientifically engineered"? Either bothb×ere or both weren't I think.
Talk:Naval Aircraft Factory TF

message: The first para states that the  Bureau of Aeronautics approved the plans to produce the four pre-production aircraft - BuAer wasn't created until August 10 1921, however, almost a year after the first aircraft flew.  Something wrong there perhaps?Nigel Ish (talk) 00:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Bureau of Aeronautics
Talk:Anarhichas minor

message: I just added a photo of this species. The photo is of an individual caught in Greenland by a local as bi-catch while fishing for Greenland halibut. The individual was later eaten by me among others with great delight some months ago. These types of fish seems to quite common at the West coast of Greenland as bi-catch when fishing Greenland halibut and they are sold as consumer fish in supermarkets. I was therefore very surprised by the repeated statements about the conservation status of the species. It is repeated several times in uppercase letters that the COSEWIC status of the species is THREATENED. However on close inspection, it appears that all the statements only relate to Canadian affairs. I checked the Wikipedia guidelines concerning conservation status, and this guideline refers to the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) Red List and their online database. If I search for Anarhichas minor I get no hits. As I understand, this means it is not evaluated (NE). I do not know what can be concluded from this, but at least it does not substantiate the THREATENED statements. It is also stated here that it is not in the IUCN red list. This document in Danish from Grønlands Naturinstitut, biologists recommended to stop commercial fishing for spotted wolffish in 2004 and 2005 although the abundance of the species had increased in 2002 and 2003. All this conservation stuff is a new area to me, but I do think that the NPOV of these sections in the article can be improved. Comments? -- Slaunger (talk) 21:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questioning NPOV of Conservation status and threats 

message: I added in higher some details about the distribution of this species, and included a line that it is not categorized by the IUCN. If someone knows of other international conservation efforts, ie Danish (as mentioned above), please include. I only know of Canadian details. Aquaticspeciesatrisk (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response 

message: In "Diet" in the accompanying article, i am ignorant of whether tube worms within a single taxon are relevant, or the general article Tube worm (body plan) should be linked, and i left the Dab un-byp'd.--Jerzy•t 08:07 & 19:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tube worms
Talk:Booger

message: First off, is this a disambig page or an actual article? Because it appears to be a melding of both which would be wrong. Secondly, are there really types of boogers? This page at least needs some citations or maybe this content should be deleted. Thirdly, I would imagine that this page it subject to a lot of vandalism, even the current content is questionable. I propose this page should be a redirect to dried nasal mucus or possibly just mucus if you consider the former article inappropriate as well. Noha307 (talk) 23:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-Up 

message: hey what is up boogers are green and gross. There is snot and mucus in your nose.your nose has more then 100 hairs in it and sometimes boogers get stuck to the hairs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.248.58.212 (talk) 01:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  boogers 

message: In all seriousness, I'm surprised to see no dedicated "booger" page. Maybe something about the etymology of this extremely common term should be considered?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.76.69.33 (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No page for boogers? 

message: Boogers: a tasty treat that taste like ice cream  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.253.111.82 (talk) 04:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  boogers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Talk:New Richland, Minnesota

message: If you would like to edit this article, please review the following to get a better idea of what to include:
# All city articles MUST follow this guideline for layout and content: Wikipedia:USCITY
# Please examine these city examples: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania; Stephens City, Virginia; Kent, Ohio; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please do NOT add text that sounds like a realtor advertisement, but instead write like a neutral-party encyclopedia.
# Please read the  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. 
# How to cite sources by adding references? Add references or someone may delete your text.
# What is Verifiability?
Sbmeirow (talk) 08:08, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Tobacco and other drugs

message: The tobacco smoking page has been deemed to be too long. I've created this page as a home for info relating to "gateway" models and correlative models as they relate to tobacco and other drugs. This is not the Gateway drug theory page, but links to it. The name is bad. Perhaps someone could suggest something better? Maybe "Tobacco's relationship to other drugs" Phyesalis (talk) 21:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article origins

message: From the opening paragraph: "The two main theories are the phenotypic causation (gateway) model and the correlated liabilities model. The causation model argues that smoking is a primary influence on future drug use, while the correlated liabilities model argues that smoking and other drug use are predicated on genetic or environmental factors."
Am I reading this right?  The two main theories for why people smoke and do drugs is:
# "The tobacco made me do it.", or
# "My DNA or environment made me do it." ??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.19.0.35 (talk) 06:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes; although for part 2 perhaps it would be better to say "My DNA or environment made me do drugs." (that is, both tobacco and 'other drugs'). Klbrain (talk) 04:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Responsibility
Talk:Bryan Jenkins

message: I couldn't figure out what country Bryan Jenkins is from, so if someone knows could they replace the :Category:Urban planners with where he is from or works it would be great. Thanks. Eóin (talk) 21:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the introduction is now clear enough to remove the 'insufficient introduction' tag. Mrfebruary (talk) 11:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:Eurest

message: I don't understand the UN paragraph.  What does the UN have to do with Eurest?  Some more explanation may bve needed.
It was a fraud scandal, I added a link and a source.90.244.93.79 (talk) 22:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Nations 

message: Really think this should be merged with Compass Group, at lot of information is mirrored. 89.100.59.183 (talk) 13:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:USRC Forward (1842)

message: 1. Donald Canney. U.S. Coast Guard and Revenue Cutters, 1790-1935. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1995.
2. U.S. Coast Guard. Record of Movements: Vessels of the United States Coast Guard: 1790 - December 31, 1933. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1934; 1989 (reprint).
3. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. U.S. Coast Guard Historian's Office.    http://www.uscg.mil/history/webcutters/Forward_1842.pdf
4. Coast Guard History U.S. Coast Guard Public Information Division, Wash, D.C. Publication: CG-213. USGPO: 1958 O460332. Tjlynnjr (talk) 06:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for possible use here in references
Talk:Nokia Nseries

message: N73 does not have wifi capabilities as mentioned in the intro prargraph — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.98.83.230 (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am changing the line series of mulimedia cimputers to series of digital handhelds series of multimedia smartphones.
---Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: “Nokia is NOT replacing Symbian with Maemo". Quoted from the very source that is attached to "Nokia has plans to replace the Symbian OS with Maemo on higher-end Nseries devices in the future."
Changing "has" to "does not have".--190.1.59.44 (talk) 04:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge mistake 

message: If Nokia N1 is not marketed as a N Series device why does it have to be listed here as such? Wouldn't it be better to eliminate any reference to it here and put it in a See also section and possibly a hatnote saying  because really the N1 is in its separate product line as it runs neither Symbian nor MeeGo, but Android. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 16:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the N1 really a N-series device?
Talk:Close but No Cigar

message: When did the cat ever have sex with one of the females? I watched the video, and I never saw that happen. 
All he did was sit ontop of her butt, and she had jeans on, if thats the part that is being refferenced too.
68.7.143.174 (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the studio and live he has this cool instrument. It makes a clicking noise. What is it? —Coastergeekperson04's talk@Feb/08/08 05:01
It is a vibraslap.  DFS (talk) 09:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fancy instrument 

message: I will be merging several articles for individual songs in the upcoming days. This article will be merged with the article for Straight Outta Lynwood due to lack of content and notability required for a separate page.Spman (talk) 03:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to Merge

message: I expected to read the source of this saying, not the title of a video.
I.e., https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/close,_but_no_cigar 
-Scott Evans  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.37.66.186 (talk) 20:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual source of this saying?