lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WUVN

message: I mistakenly reverted 205.188.116.66's edit on September 3, thinking they copied the entire article once again (which, admittedly they didn't). However, while their latest edit seems to have been re-written so that it isn't entirely a carbon copy of the website in question, the re-write is still rather poorly written and structured (as is 205.188.116.xx's usual style, no offense to them). If anyone wants to restore 205.188.116.66's edit (as a properly written and structured article), go ahead. (I probably won't get around to this task anytime soon.) - Hinto 20:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 205.188.116.66 had decided to copy the content from  again, and again interspersed content from that page with his/her own poorly articulated additions. I've attempted to re-word the article so that it sounds less like a direct copy from the aforementioned site; if you don't think it's enough, either re-word it further or just delete the whole thing and start from scratch (though I have a feeling 205.188.116.xx will do his/her thing again should that happen). - Hinto 02:51, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states WHTX-LP is channel 43, however the FCC information gives the channel for WHTX-LP at channel 10. Jimtrue 11:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WHTX-LP channel number 

message: There is nothing in this Wikipedia article that discusses the analog-to-digital conversion, or CSA with WUTH.  Can anyone expand on these? Seven1672 (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analog-to-digital conversion
Talk:WWL (AM)

message: WWL has the rare legal status of operating on a clear channel frequency, making it a clear channel radio station. This generic use of the term is several generations old. This is also an extremely important fact about WWL that should be mentioned towards the top of the article, even in the first paragraph.
Clear Channel Communications is a radio company, lately infamous, that took the name. The company doesn't have anything to do with a radio station and its frequency being a clear channel or not.
Clear channel are technical parameters for a set radio stations; Clear Channel Communications is a company that owns some radio stations, very few of which are clear channel stations.
In the Lincoln-Douglas debates, Lincoln famously called one of Douglas' arguments "a specious and fantastic arrangement of words, by which a man can prove a horse chestnut to be a chestnut horse." That's about what we have here!
...Then again, on Wikipedia, Lincoln is a disambiguation...
*sigh* Just watch out for the difference, folks. :)
Thoughts and prayers for anyone in WWL's daytime listening area... :\ Samaritan 20:44, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Clear channel]] *yes*, [[Clear Channel Communications]] no 

message: I don't understand the statement that the station didn't play Classical music because they were owned by Loyola. How does that follow? Puzzled, -- Infrogmation 02:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Classical

message: Why isn't there more about Hurricane Katrina on this page? They were the ONLY station broadcasting for some time after Katrina and 870 was the main station of the United Radio Broadcasters of New Orleans.Ckety 20:16, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katrina 

message: Section 2.0, 'Programming, about the third paragraph,  needs to be addressed.  I would try to straighten it out, but I honestly can't make out what the intended meaning was.  Rags (talk) 01:30, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming
Talk:Tietz

message: I just finished translating this; if anyone could look it over for mistakes, that would be great. :) Thanks! ManekiNeko | Talk 20:58, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated 

message: Are all the nine people listed here related as implied by the "See also" section of the Hermann Tietz entry? Iss246 (talk) 02:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related?
Talk:Ersatz good

message: Shouldn't this be a wikitionary article?--The Kooky One 21:14, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: just restating the previous statement. Actually i think noone would use surrogat in German. It sound so technical and distant, i wouldn't even consider it a German word. ––Christian Günther (talk) 23:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

text: Whether they would have given the POWs real coffee if they had it, we'll never know. What we do know is that they didn't have real coffee. Germany was under British blockade in both World Wars and hence could not import coffee. I will say this, though. The Germans only invented ersatz coffee because they didn't have the real thing. I doubt they would have wasted their time inventing a fake coffee just to spite POWs if they had the real stuff on hand. Jsc1973 (talk) 19:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

message: I think this article needs to explain what is "POW"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.212.45.250 (talk) 18:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POW 

message: To always get a negative meaning of ersatz in German, you can use Ersatz es second word in a compound Word: Kaffee-Ersatz, Brot-Ersatz, … 
That is not as widely applicable as Ersatz-…, though (and Ersatz-… does have the negative implication for some words).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArneBab (talk • contribs) 12:48, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ersatz-… vs. …-ersatz 

message: Though there were certainly some substitute products devised due to shortages, I want to question some of the stated ones.
The war sausage in particular coming to mind, as with some Googling I managed to find a 1918 British illustrated report about how bad German substitute food was, one included some of the claimed ones here, such as a sausage made from meat scraps, 'plant fibre', water, and coagulated ox blood bleached with hydrogen peroxide.
These examples being seemingly cited from what's probably at least in part, typical old wartime propaganda, I think at least be noted. 217.209.145.79 (talk) 23:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  War Sausage
Talk:Itty bitty machine company

message: I did a bit of cleaning to take off some but not all of the initial rough edges.  I'll only mention one removal here, that of the sentence "They are mentioned in the book Soul of a new machine by Tracy Kidder, in the chapter "Going to the fair"."  If some relevant article content can be cited to this source, then that's ok, but just noting the company was mentioned in a book is not relevant. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: I worked there part-time for a while, back in the 1977-78 timeframe. I was one of the guys down in the dungeon (basement), assembling and testing the kits so they could sell pre-assembled hardware. IIRC they were indeed visited by IBM lawyers, but were allowed to continue using the name provided the 'i', 'b', and 'm' were never capitalized.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Uchima (talk • contribs) 21:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I used to work there... 

message: I don't remember anything about gangs of lawyers entering the store. I believe it was all done by mail in the usual way lawyer way.
I remember one very funny in retrospect incident at the store. A man bought a Lear ADM3 video terminal kit from us. He came back on Monday and said "This thing doesn't work." I went in the back room with Perry Ferrazi the manager at Eveanston at the time. We opened it up and there were caterpillars of solder everywhere. Each DIP chip (example 7400) had globs of solder running from one pin to the next making a dead short across all of them. Perry knew this was an important customer we wanted to keep. We walked out front to talk to the solderer. Perry asked him "How long did it take you to build the kit?" He replied, "About 2 six packs." Perry walked to the back and was very angry. He sent me back to tell the ADM owner it would probably take us a week or so to fix it. The man was happy. We had to build a new ADM3 to give him and then try desoldering and rebuilding the ADM3 that was wrecked. Kit building failures didn't help itty bitty profits. A9k (talk) 01:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I ran worked in Evanston store and then ran the Lombard store
Talk:Ad infinitum

message: The poem as quoted is a parody of Swift's original by a guy called Augustus de Morgan. I am clarifying the situation.Zargulon 21:25, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Humorous Poem

message: Doesn't this article belong in Wiktionary?  A Latin phrase with some juicy citations seems like dictionary, not encyclopedia, material. --macrakis (talk) 17:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary?
Talk:Mormon music

message: This page is definitely of pretty low quality.  I've tried to work on it a bit but I can tell you that we Mormon musicians still don't have a very clear view of what "Mormon music" is, and the page is obviously going to reflect that.  I took out a few sentences that just seemed to be Deseret Book bashing.  Whether or not they deserve it, it must be neutral in tone and referenced in order to be on this page. Syphax1 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am thinking that this page needs an overhaul, or perhaps should be moved to a different title. The title is pretty broad, and I think the subject matter presented is way off base from what someone is probably searching for. Any thoughts? Isaac Crumm 07:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs expansion in a lot of areas, but I'm not sure what title change you're thinking of. What do you think people are probably looking for that wouldn't be "Mormon music". Tuf-Kat 01:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jimbei

message: This article was added by User:84.239.128.5, who seems to be on a bit of a link-spamming spree for a certain site,as a verbatim copy of an article from that site. The subject is perfectly valid though; there is a perfectly good article on the Japanese wikipedia (ja:甚平), which is probably more informative than the original "contribution". Ianb 21:53, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:2005–06 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season

message: So I'll start. I uploaded new images for most of the storms in the list. If those storms with the 'R' suffix and 'F' suffix are supposed to be expanded, I will try to find more for them too. Why are the tropical lows included?
Next thing before this article needs before it is split are track maps and infoboxes. I can't do the track maps on my computer, I don't know if the templates are set up for these types of storms, and I don't know whether the wind speeds I looked at are 10 minute averages or 1 minute averages. Good kitty 22:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The naming system on these cyclones is extremely confusing. Does Australia assign its own numbers before using a name or is it part of the numbering scheme that ends with 'S'? I was conflicted on whether to put "Tropical Cyclone" or "Tropical Depression" on some of these. I know TD is correct, but they are often equivalent to "Tropical Storm" on the SSS scale (I used the 1-minute averages on all of these). Feel free to correct the names on some of those. I can't find parameters on the templates that fit. Good kitty 17:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Australia does not assign any numbers before using a name for a cyclone. RaNdOm26 06:02, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Um, this needs a 'To do' list

message: Why are there northern hemisphere tropical cyclone symbols next to southern hemisphere tropical cyclones?!  Thegreatdr 01:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. – Chacor 01:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't think there's a reverse of that image. They were just there as a reminder that this page and every S. Hemisphere season page except one is very incomplete. I gave it a try, but even the naming conventions are really messed up so I quit there. This also needs track maps but only three people can make those. Good kitty 03:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Someone may have noticed this, but....
Talk:Political status of Taiwan/Archive 2

message: Mababa and 66.215.70.31 added some paragraphs under the section #Position of the ROC. These paragraphs are related to the legal status of Taiwan. Should they be kept or move? (contents added)  — Instantnood 20:34 Feb 26 2005 (UTC)
:That is a same exact text that was added to Constitution of the Republic of China. I really don't like the idea of cross-posting. Leading people to the relevant article will do fine. --Jiang 21:30, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Contents related to legal status of Taiwan

message: I suggest that the subsection 2004 developments should be removed.
It's also time to include stuff about the "anti-secession" law.
Allentchang 05:59, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is way too long 

message: This is the final call for any opinions on removing the 2004 developments section.  I will have the audacity to remove it soon . . .
Allentchang 02:33, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Could someone cite this poll?  There are a huge number of polls in Taiwan with varying degrees of credibility.  If it is something by "Taiwan thinktanks" which I suspect that it is, then you need to mark it as such with notes on who the people are. Roadrunner 23:18, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final call for removing 2004 developments 

message: ::In October 2004, just after president Chen's speech on Taiwan's national day, one poll revealed that over 60% of Taiwan's residents identify themselves as Taiwanese only. Those who would call themselves both Taiwanese and Chinese dropped to below 20%, but roughly the same number still identify themselves as Chinese only. That number corresponds numerically to the percentage of people that migrated from China at the end of the Civil War in 1949. Roadrunner 23:18, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think that would be the perfect resource to start an article over National identity of the Taiwanese to address the question of how close the Taiwanese are moving toward a nation, the debate in the talk page in the article of Taiwan. As for Lien's visit, I doubt how much would be changed. You should see how his talks in Beijing in the news. There is a reason why he was not elected twice. I belive that he is just gambling his political life. The tension across the strait has to be dealt between governments eventually.--Mababa 01:09, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poll over Taiwanese identity 

message: Not that politics ever is.
:Could you be more specific? (And sign your comments?) Thanks. --Loren 03:02, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is no detailed explanation about the reason that article is not neutral, then in the next couple of days, I'm going to remove the neutrality is disputed notice. Allentchang 16:52, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not neutral
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Yu-Gi-Oh!

message: Just to clear up dome confusion, some of the pages under the scope of WP:YGO have had a recent quality reassessment. If anyone has any questions, Feel free to ask me! TF { Contribs }  19:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:YGO]] Quality Reassessment 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Talk:Raymond, New Hampshire

message: I need to know the time of Sunset in Raymond, New Hampshire, on October 17, 2000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.66.13.174 (talk) 22:36, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why and how are we to tell you? Ttenchantr (talk) 06:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Raymond CDP article with this article. --Ken Gallager (talk) 20:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Recommended precaution

message: I got this on my talk page:
:Hi Striver. I've made some edits to the article.
Could you take a look if they are OK?
Thanks. LambiamTalk 00:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: . Hi. I want to expand the article. meanwhile i am waiting for your opinions.m,sharaf (talk) 10:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kotekan

message: I'm not actually too sure what nyok cok is, so feel free to correct me. I made an example of what I think it might be, but I can't fit it in without messing up the flow of the page, so I left it out because it's probably wrong anyway. =P —Keenan Pepper 22:45, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Nyok cok

message: Empat intervals are often close to being 5ths, but not always.  In 4 tone Angklung music, (Angklung daun empat) the outer keys are close to a fifth and that is the only empat that is possible.  In Gong Kebyar, some of the empat combinations are close to a fifth, but one in particular is closer to a sixth.  In Gamelan Jegog, empats are often close to a seventh and sometimes close to a sixth, but a fifth requires a kumpiung (a interval created by playing two keys that have one note inbetween).  Intervals from adjacent notes are rare in traditional Balinese gamelan music. --Samuel Wantman 23:32, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balinese intervals
Talk:Tim Kash

message: Why are the references from BBC News, IMDb and the Independent constantly being removed? The justification for including them is that they relate and are integral to Kash's background and his tenure at TOTP.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.164.251 (talk) 20:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of reliable, NPOV references 

message: I've fully protected this article for 3 days.  I have intentionally protected the current version, as it's always better to protect a BLP without potentially contentious material than with.  Please take this issue to WP:BLPN.  Keep in mind that unsourced negative/contentious statements about living people must be removed immediately, and re-adding them is a big no-no.  User's may also want to consider WP:RS, as I'm not sure that all of those so-called "references" actually meet our guidelines.  Qwyrxian (talk) 06:25, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Full protection

message: Does anyone have any live links, or copies of old articles, that verify that Kash specifically (not just the show) was criticised?  The only RS in the section is a dead link; this doesn't necessarily preclude it from being used, but since a lot of the rest of the section was badly sourced or didn't quite match the sources, I'm concerned. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In order to be fully WP:BLP compliant, I've replaced those sources with some that are still live and more clear.  They don't talk about Kash as directly the problem, so the section has been revised accordingly. However, if reliable reviews can be found that ascribe part of the problem to Kash, then that info could be re-added. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative TOTP info 
Talk:Utica Devils

message: If you know about a past affiliation, by all means, mention it in the History section. I'm trying to bring consistency to the AHL team pages, and I'm not up to researching every agreement. If you know this, then go ahead. The Utica Devils are a no-brainer, but can you list every affiliate of the Hershey Bears, New Haven Nighthawks or Maine Mariners. Did you know that the Binghamton  Whalers had an affiliation with the Washington Capitals? ccwaters 15:38, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Affiliations
Talk:Mr. Popper's Penguins

message: This is my first article, so feel free to clean it up, move things around, whatever is appropriate. I'd only ask that any changes be noted here, so that I know what to do for next time. :) Chrismith 23:14, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it would be more appropriate for "Mr. Popper's Penguins" to direct here, with a hatnote template linking to "Mr. Popper's Penguins (film)".  It seems excessive to have a disambiguation page for just two articles.  Thoughts? 76.199.64.109 (talk) 05:00, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the move because it looks like the film and the book are about equally as notable. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 05:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a disambiguation page? 

message: What is the rising action of Mr.Popper’s penguins? 65.36.94.202 (talk) 20:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr.Popper’s penguins
Talk:The Saga Begins

message: It looks like we have almost all of the lyrics in the main page now. This might be going a bit beyond fair use, would someone with more knowledge please comment? —dcclark (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't hold it to that.  Somebody misquoted the line which should state "some Gungans died" - I think someone needs to work on this article while actually listening to the song. -- MasterXiam 12:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually the youtube video is also violating copyright unless Al or a representative uploaded it. Gdo01 (talk) 22:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair Use 

message: In the video, I think I saw Darth Vader in the background. Is this true? --  Bobman123 23:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vader? 

message: I've removed someone's personal website as a violation of WP:EL (self-promotion and advertising) and am considering instead a link to http://www.alsongs.com. Thoughts? RadioKirk (u|t|c) 17:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics link

message: Per WP:AVTRIV, please rewrite this article's "trivia" section into prose, using only the data that survives notability and reliability standards. Thanks. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 01:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia section

message: As I note in , I cannot find any evidence that McLean has ever said publicly that he's accidentally (or otherwise, for that matter) sung Yankovic's lyrics in performance. The Chicago Tribune couldn't (or didn't) confirm it in , while the parody is mentioned only in passing in two more  . If anyone can find something more solid, it should be added. 🖖ATinySliver/ATalkPage 04:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: McLean and the lyrics

message: The redirect My, my, this here Anakin guy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 23:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:My, my, this here Anakin guy]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]