lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Superstar USA

message: :I would tend to disagree strongly. None of the phrasing indicates an opinion on the show based on the contributors/writers. I think you are getting that impression simply because of the tone of the show itself which is very accurately described. There are no adjectives used to described that are not simply accurate. For instance in regards to the "insulting makeovers," this was not just a subtext, it was an actual INTENTION of the show's producers that was addressed within the show. IE: the "hosts" would comment to the camera about how stupid the contestants were for believing they resembled other famous people whom they did not. Pacian 19:27, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Pacian. It seems that the article, to me, in fact does not discuss any heat the show may've received for such awful deception - except the final part about Make A Wish.  Neutrality (balance of opinions) is not an issue, methinks, for it lacks any reporting/analysis of said opinions.  Myself, never heard of it 'til now (I guess), never cared for Am.Id.; seems rather amusing though, in that cruel humor. JamesEG 03:11, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 
Talk:Polyol

message: It looks as if someone stole this page from somewhere, but a web search hasn't brought up anything...
:Applications was a copy so I took it out --Henrygb 17:59, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The lead sentence A polyol is an alcohol containing multiple hydroxyl groups. is correct.
Issues:
*The article makes no distinction between polymeric compounds containing terminal hydroxyl groups (polyether polyols) and (polyester polyols) and polymeric compounds containing multiple hydroxyl groups
*"Polymeric polyols are generally used to produce other polymers" - too specific -  uses include additives etc
*"Polymeric polyols are usually polyethers or polyesters" - too specific, PVA etc are not mentioned
*potentially misleading by exclusion
*Though the references given do describe the compounds as "polyols" this is not the basis for generalization.
The article makes no mention of Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) which is unambiguously a polyol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xiiophen (talk • contribs) 07:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected some of the issues you listed. Minihaa (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple issues

message: For such a big subject in my opinion this article is short on references. I will see what I can add and work on the article. GRALISTAIR (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than using dictionaries, try to find a layperson-friendly WP:SCIRS review(s) that encompasses definitions, classifications, uses, etc. in one or two refs. No sources from companies, which can be interpreted as WP:PROMO or "seminars" which are not publicly accessible or published under peer-review. Thanks. Zefr (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I will do my best GRALISTAIR (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:4B3T

message: The one documented is the ISDN variant, which has a lower DC disparity bound of ±1.5.  The original one allowed the DC to get to ±3:
Original 4b3t code
Input	Negative	Positive	Disparity
0000 	+ 0 −   	+ 0 −   	0
0001 	− + 0   	− + 0   	0
0010 	0 − +   	0 − +   	0
0011 	+ − 0   	+ − 0   	0
0100 	− − 0   	+ + 0   	±2
0101 	0 − −   	0 + +   	±2
0110 	− 0 −   	+ 0 +   	±2
0111 	− − −   	+ + +   	±3
1000 	− − +   	+ + −   	±1
1001 	+ − −   	− + +   	±1
1010 	− + −   	+ − +   	±1
1011 	− 0 0   	+ 0 0   	±1
1100 	0 − 0   	0 + 0   	±1
1101 	0 0 −   	0 0 +   	±1
1110 	0 + −   	0 + −   	0
1111 	− 0 +   	− 0 +   	0
* 
71.41.210.146 (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original 4b3t code
Talk:Macedonia (Roman province)

message: Okay, I don't know (or don't remember, having read it before) when the province of Macedonia was divided into Macedonia Prima and Macedonia Salutaris. Internet sources say anywhere from the 3rd Century AD, the Fourth Century AD, or the Fifth Century AD. And Macedonia Salutaris seems to have been reorganized and renamed Macedonia Secunda at some (later) point. ---Alexander 007 11:44, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to know where in the sources it is stated that Moesia, Dardania and Pannonia early on were part of the province of Macedonia as is stated by this article Aeolic order (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article's in-text references indicate, you can read about this at length in  and . They collect the (large) number of literary and epigraphic references. Furius (talk) 19:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Yeah, and I want this page gone because it dismisses my lineage and the current fact that ITS ITS OWN DAMN COUNTRY NOW. Jesus you people are something else. 2601:406:8400:1EA0:49F5:E8DA:3B9D:4725 (talk) 21:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early geography of the Roman province of Macedonia
Talk:Charlotte High School (Michigan)

message: This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:57, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article needs much expansion, including an infobox. At the present, any rating above Stub class could not be justified. The article displays no more than low importance. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:The Black Keys

message: It appears to me that the full name of the band is: "The Six Parts Seven", not "Six Parts Seven" nor "the Six Parts Seven".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Six_Parts_Seven Michael V Gold (talk) 04:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "The" does not get capitalized mid-sentence. See MOS:THEMUSIC Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk •  contributions) 05:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper Spelling (3 Capitalized words or 4? ) of Band referenced here: {T}he Six Parts Seven.
Talk:Morarji Desai

message: R&AW grew stronger till Mrs Gandhi didn't loose elections after emergency. This was Indian Prime minister Morarji's who shared R&AW's superb officials names list with other foreign intelligence agencies and got them eliminated. After emergency, Mrs Gandhi came to power but by then ISI & NATO's agencies succeeded  damaging R&AW considerably. Our agency miserably failed in Sri Lanka & Punjab. Many unsung heroes of R&AW died in line of duty. Morarji Desai was given "Nishaan- E-Pakistan" after he lost elections for his obedient role destroying R&AW. India doesn't have any policy for dealing with political treason. Prashanna01 (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traitor 

message: On 12 November 1969, Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi was expelled from the Congress party for helping candidate opposing the official nominee of the Congress party. Indira Gandhi then organized her own faction of the Congress party called Congress(R) while Moraraji Desai and K. Kamaraj remained in the original Congress now termed Congress (O). It is incorrect to say that Morarji Desai had resigned from Congress. See Indian National Congress (Organisation) Malaiya (talk) 06:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  He did not resign from Congress

message: In his book The Price of Power, Seymour Hersh claims that Morarji Desai was paid $20,000 a year for leaking the details of the cabinet meetings of Indra Gandhi, see pages 450-477, Kindle Edition. 
Is anybody going to write about that? Surjit Singh (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paid informer to the CIA
Talk:Will Scarlet

message: Traditionally -- that is, in the traditional ballads -- most of Robin Hood's band are not detailed enough so you can tell their ages -- nor is Will Scarlet made younger than most of them.  Nor is red silk traditional.  Goldfritha 01:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Traditionally

message: Removed the reference to pop band illScarlett. Optrirominiluikus (talk) 08:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed reference to pop orchestra
Talk:James Bond 007: Agent Under Fire

message: The box art is shown for the PS2 when it is also available for the xbox, please replace it with a transparent logo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachary8222 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to suggest a move to 007: Agent Under Fire as that seems to be the official title. We can also drop the (video game) bit as there's no article at that link. Suggestions or opinions?--analoguedragon 20:09, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Likewise with Nightfire, I'm pretty sure the actual title is "James Bond 007: Agent Under Fire", although I've also see "James Bond 007 in... Agent Under Fire". K1Bond007 21:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: On the spine of the PS2 box it says "James Bond 007 in... Agent Under Fire".--Codenamecuckoo 08:10, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to 007: Agent Under Fire

message: I'm going to add a spoiler warning. As I did with Nightfire.--Codenamecuckoo 18:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler

message: In response to the addition of the disputed tag. There is a Q-Slick. See . Look under "Bond moves." K1Bond007 22:00, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Q slick

message: Wasn't the engine for this game Quake 3? I remember the multiplayer bots climbing stairs backwards (while shooting) from one James Bond game, and thought it incredibly (and saddly) Quake-like. I'm not sure if it's this one, though.
:Yes it was originally Quake 3, but modified by Ritual Entertainment for the game Heavy Metal FAKK2.  It's an early build of that game.  Obviously PS2 and PC (GL) are different platforms so not a lot of the actual Q3 architecture remained intact, mostly the build pipe/high level rendering/lighting and high level rendering runtime.
:I wrote the bot behaviors for AUF on Gamecube and Xbox and they used zero code from Quake 3.  My personal favorite is the Q-Claw behavior.  Lgascoig 17:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine

message: No one likes trivial minutiae better than I, but the Trivia section for this article does not cite any of its sources.  If sources aren't provided, that gives people carte blanche to delete the entire section. SpinyMcSpleen 06:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Trivia 

message: I see this article has been flagged for wikification.  However, from the [Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikify#Wikification|wikify project guidelines] I do not see anything in the article that warrants this tag?  Perhaps I am missing something? 78.105.230.89 (talk) 00:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify tag still relevant? 

message: It's possible to hack into the PS2 via the first level, and is a large part of why it's still bought nowadays.
  
Herg-derg-editor (talk) 20:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider adding a section on PS2 homebrew
Talk:Ovaltine/Archive 1

message: Is this an ad?Wetman 12:00, 30 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: This is certainly not an ad. However, in England the product is known as Ovaltine (see http://zeus.ia.net/~gheller/ovalgon/ovaltine.htm for an explanation and also the song "Who Put the Benzedrine in Mrs Murphy's Ovaltine?"), so it might be a good idea to have a redirect to or from Ovaltine.  --KF 13:27, 30 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: Can anyone check whether this product is available in the US, too? It is known as Ovaltine in the UK, so maybe it should be moved.... -- Kokiri 17:10, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Ovaltine
Talk:CBK (AM)

message: "CBK" is short for "Comeback Kid", the name of a hardcore/punk band. So, should we add a template to the top of this page mentioning this band, or should we have "CBK" redirect to the band, or have a disambig page, or what? -EdGl 22:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CBK 

message: Received on 540 khz in San Francisco on 04 November 2006, around 11pm PST, with a Tecsun BCL-2000 receiver. Anyone know the AM transmitter strength? bneely 07:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DX 
Talk:Elizabeth Loftus

message: Hello . I agree that "scientific" can be used instead of "academic" if that is your preference.
Loftus is much more widely known that a typical researcher in the psychology field, and this notability comes from her involvement in legal cases. Therefore I believe that the legal work should take precedence in the intro.
Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No. That is just your individual impression, from your individual information sources. Everybody who is half-way well-informed about memory research, as well as everybody in the skeptic community, knew Loftus for decades before any of those legal cases started (if they are old enough). Those legal cases are all from the last three years! The article was first written in 2006. Please read WP:RECENT to correct your misunderstandings of Wikipedia policy. --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Loftus's work has been important for many years in understanding how memory works and how fallible it it. Because court cases are so often base on memory, and because the stakes are so high in court cases, it's inevitable that her work would be applied in that field, but she is primarily a research psychologist doing scientific work in the study of memory. She has long been widely known in the field of psychology, but you are right that her involvement in court has made her more well known in general. I'm surprised by the list of people she has been involved in defending; they are some pretty reprehensible people, but even they deserve a defense. I wonder if that list is a fair reflection of the people she has worked with. SchreiberBike | ⌨  15:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro section 

message: (Copied over from my comment on the user's talk page)
 In your most recent edits, you selectively used only part of the cited source. Namely, you wrote: 
:
The source, however, says: 
:
: 
I contend that what you added to the article does not represent a neutral summary of what the source says. Donald Albury 15:11, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result of investigation 

message: I added that in December 2022, on video, Loftus admitted to recovering her own repressed memories of child sexual abuse. It's been deleted twice. Why is wiki creating a false narrative? 2600:6C52:6E00:2B1:20FE:C5E2:9965:8DAB (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to provide sources for this, preferably secondary sources to demonstrate that it is notable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Yeah, if person A and person B disagree, it necessarily follows that person B "creates a false narrative". --Hob Gadling (talk) 22:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting my edits? 

message: Why is rememberingdangerously.com a WP:RS? tgeorgescu (talk)  22:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RS
Talk:Otherkin/Archive 4

message: With the recent round of changes, I think this article is in excellent shape. It accurately reports beliefs as stated by people who identify as otherkin, and seems quite well referenced to that effect. I'd be happy to see the tag removed at this point. Parker Whittle 04:54, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think the sources are still largely blatantly ridiculous, which was my main reason for putting the tag there.  I'd love to see the worst ones go away.  However it looks like folks who know much more about the subject than me are already working on it, so I'm not going to put up a fight on this issue.  Friday 05:22, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Common practice, true.  Explicitly forbidden by policy, also true.  Personally, I'd rather see personal experiences used than some of the web sites this article currently cites.  Friday 13:22, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

text: PS. To clarify what I mean.. a lot of sources does not IMO mean "well referenced".  I took the time to actually read some of the websites used as references here.  They sound like they were written by children, and they say things that don't make any sense, even in the context of otherkin beliefs.  This is why I think we'd be better off without them.  Friday 13:26, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NOR]] tag still necessary?
Talk:Overture Center for the Arts

message: Looks like there is more than one of them. This edit replaced a stub about the Overture Center in Chicago with another stub for the Overture Center in Madison, Wisconsin. Not sure whether either is notable. Rl 08:18, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If someone with more time on their hands wants to put in some of the venue information, especially relating to the galleries, that would be wonderful; the Overture Center web page has some good info to start . . . --Lowfatsourcreme 12:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venue Descriptions 

message: I noticed the [art ] and [architecture] sections in the Madison article contain links to a [currently non-existant] article on the Madison Museum of Contemporary Art. Considering that this article contains a section on MMoCA, I would think that Madison Museum of Contemporary Art should redirect to the Overture article.
--Chief-O, 09:14, 3 June 2006
*Done.  Creating non-existent redirects that do not and most likely will not overlap in name with any other topic needn't be discussed first.  Remember, edit boldly! Cheers. --Hraefen 16:10, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Redirect from MMoCA?? 

message: Can someone supply the date(s) when the Overture Center - or parts of it - opened?
Done!!! Chief-O 01:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Opening
Talk:Nahnebahwequa

message: It says in the article that she changed her name of Catherine Bunch to Catherine Brown, should it not be written as Catherine Brown out of respect for her choice? 2001:8F8:1165:A8BB:C53C:9CA:8DBB:DD61 (talk) 13:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Francisco Palencia

message: Who Erased?
Who erased the official photo page and site on Paco Palencia in the External links - category? Please do not eraze! cool :). It should be included in the Palencia page, because Cruz Azul was the team, were he gain success and recognition as a soccer player. I move the Photo gallery in the "See also" category. - Gonzalo 3:00 p.m., 19 August 2005.
:That was me. For one thing, it's certainly not an "official" photo page, but regardless, you get Page Not Found errors when you click on most of those images. Are you the one who manages that page? If so, when you have everything working (no broken images, no page not found errors), then put the link back. Additionally, I'm guessing that English isn't your first language, so I had cleaned up a lot of the grammar and spelling. Trust me, it reads better now, so I reverted everything back to my last edit. --Howcheng 15:45, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Churubusco

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Battle of Churubusco2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 20, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-08-20. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 00:43, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Battle of Churubusco2.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Ammunition column

message: It looks like this hasn't been modified from the 1911 article. It doesn't even mention that it's about the British military. Kjkolb 09:04, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
:The British Army header was inserted later. I know nothing about military or I would attempt it. I am sure we have users who do know about military articles and access to military sources who can. Perhaps one of them will do it.--71.28.250.210 07:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article still focuses on WWI British Army... can anyone please help expand it? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 13:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion
Talk:GKO

message: I changed "treasury bills" or "bills" into bonds, though I'm not sure.  I think "bonds" are better, because "bills" can be confused with banknotes.  If you are sure that it should be "bills", then feel free to revert it. Crocodealer 09:44, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bills-> bonds

message: Can we say how many roubles the 1988 default was, and who ended up loosing by the default. Rod57 (talk) 19:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scale of default 

message: Issuing new debt to pay off old debt doesn't make the Russian Finance Ministry resemble a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme. That is how most sovereign debt works. I'm deleting the fourth paragraph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.56.161.30 (talk) 22:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No Ponzi scheme
Talk:Amygdalin

message: Earlier, I added this study to the page published in Molecular Biology Reports.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11033-019-04656-3
The edit was just: "More recently, research has been done on IAPs, proteins that inhibit programmed cell death and are linked to cancer. A 2019 in-vitro study found that amygdalin inhibited the expression of genes which produced the IAPs Survivin and XIAP."
Within 3 minutes it was reverted by @Bon Courage with the message "Not WP:MEDRS". To which I replied that Molecular Biology Reports is a reliable source. Perhaps he hasn't heard of it, but he could have at least taken a few minutes to look it up. 3 minutes is barely enough time to read the change. So I reverted that revert.
Within 5 minutes it was reverted by @Zefr with the message "Lab research, WP:MEDINVITRO, far too preliminary to be mentioned". I've added the change to the section mentioning three historical hypothesized mechanisms of action. This study is relevant because it is recent research introducing a new one. I made clear that this was an in-vitro study. And I consider myself a pretty fast reader, but even still it took me a good hour to read this study and relevant background information on relevant IAPs like Survivin. 5 minutes sounds too fast to even get through the abstract. I reverted that revert too.
Within 9 minutes, there was another revert from @Bon Courage saying "Unreliable source, edit warring". Again, Molecular Biology Reports is a reliable source. Its a peer-reviewed journal and part of the Springer network. It would be very helpful if you explained why you think its an unreliable source.
It is very frustrating to spend over an hour genuinely trying to improve Wikipedia's body of scientific knowledge, only to be immediately shot down by what seems like drive-by Wikipedia:Wikilawyering.
-Databased (talk) 22:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You will have a different perspective after reading WP:MEDRS, with attention especially to the bottom of the left pyramid at WP:MEDASSESS, which identifies the content and source you wish to add as preliminary lab research - the lowest quality of evidence for medical content in the encyclopedia. We are not writing a journal discussion about hypothetical mechanisms, WP:NOTJOURNAL #6-7. Zefr (talk) 22:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Databased, WP:MEDRS says: " Primary sources should generally not be used for medical content, as such sources often include unreliable or preliminary information; for example, early lab results that do not hold in later clinical trials." The source you cited is a primary source. JimRenge (talk) 23:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 study of Amygdalin and IAP proteins
Talk:Karl Wilhelm Reinmuth

message: * Where is his birthplace? --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 10:05, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What I want to know... is the extragalactic system Reinmuth 80 (NGC 4517-A) in the constellation Virgo related to Karl Wilhelm Reinmuth? Is there something like the 'Reinmuth' catalog of extragalactic systems? If so, how much objects are there in this catalog? Much more than eighty? DannyCaes (talk) 12:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reinmuth 80 (extragalactic system)