lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Reli-bio-stub

message: Should this be centered? It would be uniform with the other stub templates if it were not. MithrandirMage 02:24, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
:You're right.  ℬastique▼talk 03:10, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

message: I've modified this template to conform with NPOV.  As I was corrected by Grutness on Template:reli-stub, the inclusion of a religious image from a particular point of view is inherently POV.  Additionally, I seem to believe that the use of it would truly be a blessing, while funny, is a POV statement so I've moved this towards a more conventional language.
Why don't you tell me what religious point of view that image conveyed? ℬastique▼talk 15:38, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOVing 

message: It's just a really bad joke.  --Merovingian (t) (c) 10:41, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
:I agree. It was just reverted, "to preserve topical language". I've changed it back, under the principle that templates are supposed to have NPOV language, not topical language. I first came across the religious in-jokery version on Jeremy Collier, a stub about a tough, extremist, theatre-hating, uncharitable old Puritan divine in the 17th century, and the context made the the wording about "charitable" quite incongrous: really not very topical at all. (If you want to see where Jeremy Collier was at, please see the article Short View of the Immorality and Prophaneness of the English Stage.) Conclusion: the "topical" version just doesn't fit all religious bio-stubs, not even in all Christian contexts; and of course the stub is used for other religions besides Christianity, too. Please lets keep it appropriate for any religious figure. You know, encyclopedic? Bishonen | talk 14:02, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I reverted and... 

message: I have added a template for Systematic Bias, the image used in this template seems to represent a Christian view of the subject, rather than a global unbiased symbology. Please discuss and/or change the image to something more appropriate. Sfacets 01:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That has nothing to do with systematic bias. That has to do with missorting of articles. This template is used for all material which does not have a better-scoped template, and in particular the material related to Islam and Judaism has been sorted better. I'm removing this tag. If you wish to see changes to the scope of this template, or propose new ones, the correct place to address such concerns is WP:WSS. Valentinian T / C 11:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Systematic Bias template
Talk:Marattiaceae

message: "edited by Maarten Christenhusz" -- This was in the article and I'm not sure it belongs there. If a reference needs to be made, format it to the wiki-standards and make a ref section. --DanielCD 02:37, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Music in the Tuva Republic

message: Is the Topshur used in Tuva? Badagnani 12:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. Doshpuluur is used (the word I think is cognate with topshur). --Stacey Doljack Borsody (talk) 17:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Topshur]]

message: Change inlcuding to including, because it is misspelled, it is at the end of the modern music section you may need to use ctrl+f to find it, thanks 74.73.230.173 (talk) 18:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks--Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 August 2020
Talk:Dry

message: Well, I guess from looking at Special:whatlinkshere/dry that articles such as Climate of the United Kingdom, Sick building syndrome and List of EU safety codes weren't expecting to be linking to the album, so this needs to become some kind of disambiguation.
Other uses I can think of are Dry (weather), Dry (alcoholic drinks), neither of which have specific articles written (yet...?), although the subjects are covered on other articles.
I'll come back to this in a few days if no-one else has done anything in the meantime. -- Stoive 04:20, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Can we change the definition to "a lack of liquid" or something instead of specifically water? Lesion (talk) 16:11, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defintion 

message: This page is missing mention of / reference to "wet" and "dry" being used in audio technology / terminology, meaning the saturation degree of a given transformation.
See also:
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100208071505AAAWTdt
http://www.mackie.com/pdf/glossary.pdf
Taycode (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing audio terminology reference
Talk:Ploceidae

message: Looking at what links here, I think this page should be moved Ploceidae.  — Pekinensis 02:50, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I changed the common name given for Philetairus socius to "Sociable Weaver" because
*Philetairus "Sociable Weaver" gets 81 hits at Google Scholar; Philetairus "Social Weaver" gets 10 hits, of which at least three call it the Sociable Weaver too (and include the phrase "Social Weaver" in reference to Pseudonigrita).  In a similar search at Google Books, "Sociable Weaver" wins 50 to 27; again some of the hits with "Social Weaver" use "Sociable Weaver" for Philetairus socius.
*Birds of Southern Africa by Sinclair, Hockey, and Tarboton, as well as the book of the same title by van Perlo, call it Sociable.
*The IUCN calls it Sociable.
Against this, HBW and Clements call it Social.  But "Sociable" is clearly the more familiar name to both ornithologists and birders, so I think we can overrule HBW.  —JerryFriedman 05:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Social or Sociable Weaver

message: move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Pauline Quirke

message: She has quit acting due to the long hours and is now focusing on her performing Arts Acadamie. Percy2345 (talk) 02:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quit acting
Talk:Jon Scieszka

message: A lot of those publishing dates are incorrect.  I have had most of these books way before the posted publishing dates, most notably 2095, which i've had since about 1995 (the book is about going 100 years in the future so being published in 2004 is way wrong). Vash The Stampede 02:59, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Publishing Dates
Talk:List of papal tiaras in existence

message: Queen Christiana WHO? The one that comes up most in Google is a 17th queen of Sweden, so I doubt she's the one who commissioned a 19th century papal tiara... Benami 09:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Queen Christiana

message: Numbers 19 and 20 both say "Tiara of Pope Pius XI (1922)". Is this a mistake, or did he receive two tiaras in the same year? MishaPan 03:45, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tiara of Pope Pius XI (1922)

message: This photo: :File:Bouchet Exposition les vins des papes d'Avignon Tiare de Jean XXII.jpg says it is of Pope John XXII. Should it be added to the list? --evrik (talk) 16:59, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  John XXII 
Talk:Saint Denise

message: * Q. Why Denise, instead of "Saint Denise?"
* A. The general custom is to put the most well known individual of a particular name at a spot.  If there are more than two, create a disambiguation page.  This would apply only to people who are known solely as "Denise," and not people who have Denise as a first name (i.e. no "list of famous Denises").  Thus, it would incorporate any saints and any medieval figures known as "Denise of X" or "Y."  In my research, I could find only one saint and no medieval figures by this name.  Hence the saint resides at "Denise."  Were there others (e.g. William or Robert), the eponymn page would be a disambiguation.  Geogre 03:08, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a disambig page for this...there are actually three Saint Denises: the well-known one who died in 250, a second who died in 484, and a third from Alexandria who also dates from the 3rd century. I have not been able to find out very much about the third, save her feast day (December 12), so I have left her out for the moment. Mademoiselle Sabina 05:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Who on earth wants this merged into Denis?  At least for Anglophones, that's a gender change.  Geogre 01:05, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dennis?

message: For its meanings, etymology, pronunciation, and translations, see Wiktionary.
Which only says that it’s a name. Ditto for Dennis. Should this article include them?
edit: This is the Talk page for the Denise article for some reason. —Frungi 03:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  meanings, etc.
Talk:East Perth Football Club

message: Today I formatted the list of best-and-fairest winners but given its length it would probably be best to split it off to its own page, linked from here. --The Brain of Morbius 03:12, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Incidentally, why wasn't there a winner of the B&F awarded in 1975?--The Brain of Morbius 03:14, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a 1975 winner, I'm not sure where this information (on this page) was sourced from but I've now added it in, as well as the 1930 winner which for many years had been 'forgotten' but the club recently worked out who it was. 202.154.74.114 06:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing best-and-fairests 

message: I'm wondering if we should move the FD Book medal list to a separate article, to reduce the size of the page. Most AFL clubs have it like this, and I don't see why a WAFL club should be any different. Nic the Man 13:13, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fairest and Best move to new article? 
Talk:Survivor: Guatemala, The Maya Empire

message: I don't think this page should be named like this.  Survivor: Vanuatu - Islands of Fire is at the article Survivor: Vanuatu.  The subtitle is cool, yes, but I think it makes the title unnecessarily long.  I realize I can just move this, but I think I'd rather ask before I do it. Mo0[talk] 03:22, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As a sidenote, I also apparently can't move it myself, since there's already been a redirect made at the other name.  Once a consensus is reached here, I'll go get an admin to move it.  Or someone else can, whatever works best.  Mo0[talk] 03:25, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name is too long
Wikipedia talk:Cleanup process/Archive 2

message: How is it decided when to move an article down between "newer," "new," "old" etc?  Pakaran 00:59, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Headings on Wikipedia:Cleanup

message: I've just added a large section of advice:
*It's based on less than a week of concentrated work on cleanup, but I spent that time deliberately trying to figure out how to make cleanup work harder. Thus, there are mistakes in my advice.
*It's already quite long. I don't think it should be too much longer, and if anyone thinks of a good way to say similar things in less space, please fix it.
*Please modify it to make it better, and discuss it here. The overall objective, I think, is to encourage people to treat cleanup as a personal challenge to fix everything on it as thoroughly as possible.
*If anyone thinks it's a complete load of garbage, move it here to the talk page so that we can sort it out and then put something more sensible back on the process page later.
Onebyone 04:06, 6 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: If we can make it really really short, yes. User:Jiang is snapping at the heels of Cleanup to keep it under 30k... If we get it right, just changing the text around the existing link to Wikipedia:Cleanup process might be enough to get those who are interested to follow the link. Onebyone 23:08, 6 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Having said that, I've just read your rather fine summary on Wikipedia:Wikipedia maintenance, and I think that or something like it would be well worth having on the cleanup page. Onebyone 23:25, 6 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: New advice

message: User:Mike Storm is attempting to alter the cleanup routine by advocating the user of substubs.  see Wikipedia:substub and Wikipedia talk:substub He is also being very aggressive on this, and I have reported him for being so; see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/User:Mike Storm. Dunc_Harris|☺ 21:54, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substubs
Talk:Survivor: Guatemala

message: Guatemala's logo is a fan-made logo. All official Survivor: Guatemala merchandise and even the show refers to the season as Survivor: Guatemala - The Maya Empire, not Survivor Guatemala - The Mayan Empire. Here's a Yaxhá buff with the logo, the DVD from CBS and Amazon, Yaxhá's flag from Guatemala, Nakúm's flag (while blurry, clearly only has 4 letters between "The" and "Empire"), a recap on CBS's site referring to the season as Survivor: Guatemala - The Maya Empire, and the opening credits a few seconds in flash the logo of the season, clearly showing Survivor: Guatemala - The Maya Empire. Sinjoh2015 (talk) 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guatemala's Logo 

message: Where's the reception and ratings for Survivor: Guatemala? --TMProofreader (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: There is a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Survivor task force#Jury vote tables to list the vote totals in the same order as the names in the finalist row immediately above the vote totals. All interested editors are invited to join that discussion.  Since the Survivor task force appears to be inactive, I'm notifying Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Reality television task force and the talk pages for each Survivor season in order to reach interested editors.  Schazjmd (talk) 16:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivor jury vote table discussion
Talk:Sovereign's Sceptre with Cross

message: According to our current article:
:During the coronation, the Monarch holds the Sceptre with the Cross in the right hand and the Sceptre with the Dove in the left
Yet in the Queens coronation picture immediatly to the right, she is in fact not holding the Sceptre with the Dove in her right hand, she is holding a globus cruciger (Orb with the Cross), known as the Sovereign's Orb. I am not European, but I thought the "Orb and Sceptre" were fairly common and well known regalia for all monarchies. I had never heard of holding two scepres at the same time. The orb represents the known world or universe held under the care and domain of the ruler, under the blessing of god. Also is this article English centric, do other monarchies have a sceptre with the cross? Stbalbach 03:53, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

message: There's no public-domain picture?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.69.139.16 (talk) 01:46, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pics? 

message: I am going to move the article to "Sovereign's Sceptre with Cross" per the links below. Firebrace (talk) 18:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving article
Talk:Firm Bound in Brotherhood

message: A note for all those OA brothers out there - 
As a Brotherhood member member of a ceremonies team of a Connecticut Lodge, I would like to ask that any Brother thinking about adding to this page more than should be there is only spoiling the true meaning of the Brotherhood.  Only those who have been prepared for the honor of membership in our Order should have access to the customs and traditions of our Brotherhood.
:As a Vigil Honor member, Associate Chapter adviser, former youth officer, Ordeal Master, and Ordeal Adviser, I respectfully disagree with your contention and your removal of song lyrics from this article, and the full WWW words from the Order of the Arrow article.  The article in its entirety was researched to be within National Office guidelines for safeguard, and as Gentgeen stated in the Talk:Order of the Arrow comments to you, the National Office itself publishes this material to be freely available to anyone who wishes it.  The element of "spoiling" is absent from any article discussing the Order, and I would encourage you in the future to discuss your feelings in the talk spaces for the articles prior to removing any content.  This content does not, nor has not violated the National Safeguard, nor would we as members of the Order intentionally publish any material that would do so.  KC9CQJ 05:23, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And anyway, anyone the least bit interested could check the history to find the lyrics in a few seconds. - Pureblade | Θ 02:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Plus 15

message: I know Atrium I and II (839 5th Ave and 840 6th Ave, respectively) appear on the official system map, but is it really fair to say they are connected to the system? They share an outdoor link with no access to either building. It's a 2nd floor patio that has fallen into disuse. To remove them from the list of buildings may constitute original research, but in my opinion it's misleading to have them listed. The closest building connected to the "true" +15 system is Place 800, down the block from Atrium II. 93JC (talk) 16:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buildings connected; Atrium I & II 

message: I found a newer map. The +15 map image could be updated with this info if someone wanted to.
http://calgarydowntown.xpan.ca/imagedir/plus_15_network_map.pdf 96.49.171.157 (talk) 09:35, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newer Map 

message: I think what would be a very cool statistic to include would be how many square feet of heated space is connected by the system. I would think it would be one of the largest networks of buildings in the world by that metric. Does anyone know where we could get that number? Thanks a lot, TastyCakes (talk) 17:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Square feet connected
Talk:Australian Financial Review

message: this article should be moved back to Australian Financial Review because it almost never appears with the "the" prefix in front of it, unlike the The Sydney Morning Herald in which "The" appears in the masthead.  the website simply refers to itself as Financial Review.  the fact that most the incoming links are to Australian Financial Review attests to the fact that this is the most common version. clarkk 04:43, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 2005 

message: The comments that are labelled "criticisms" are unsourced and need some reference to back them up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.226.173.11 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2006 

message: Hi Wikipedia editors, I was wondering whether anyone could shed some light as to how I could upload a non-free low resolution image of the AFR's front page in the infobox section? This is consistent with all other newspaper Wikipedia articles. The purpose of its use would be for the infobox - to provide viewers with a snapshot detailing an example of what the front page looks like. Going off of what davidwr has detailed on my personal talk page regarding WP:Non-free content criteria, I believe that a low resolution snapshot of the AFR newspaper's front page would increase the audience's understanding of the topic by showcasing the visual format of the newspaper. In compliance with criteria 3b, I would make the image's resolution lower than it was before and also crop a portion of the image to make sure only what is needed is shown. I have raised an inquiry through the file upload portal here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Australian_Financial_Review_-_20_October_2010.jpg#Summary. Please let me know if you can provide any further guidance on this matter. Thank you! Lebronverstappen (talk) 08:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uploading a low resolution image of the newspaper's front page: Copyrights and Images
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon

message: The series was retitled last year.https://twitter.com/BrianMorante/status/1558348695476715521  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.199.175 (talk) 12:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A) The tweet you linked does not even support the title change, and B) a reliable source would be needed for this change. Magitroopa (talk) 18:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Here's a Linkedin post from two days agohttps://ca.linkedin.com/posts/nelvana_meet-the-talented-mike-geiger-currently-activity-7021957386491834369-6isZ 75.117.199.175 (talk) 22:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: LinkedIn posts are not reliable sources. Please familiarize yourself with WP:RELIABLE. Nisf (talk) 14:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Here’s the trademark.https://uspto.report/TM/97394494 75.90.118.17 (talk) 03:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Here’s the resume that mentions it.http://www.janaehall.com/ 98.19.248.179 (talk) 03:28, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

text: The current title is also on Mike Geiger's Pictofolio account but I know people on Wikipedia are never going to listen to me.https://pictofolio.com/artist/mikegeiger 75.90.46.164 (talk) 13:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Here’s the Rotten Tomatoes page.https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/zokie_of_planet_ruby 98.19.246.46 (talk) 03:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Please remove Zokie of Planet Ruby from Nickelodeon. It is now an Amazon Prime Video exclusive.https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B0CN3NGFJX/ref=atv_dp_share_cu_r It was released on Amazon Prime Video, today.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.140.49.69 (talk) 16:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Zokie Sparkleby to Zokie of Planet Ruby 

message: Please add the missing seasonal programming block, Toonsday Afternoon Marathon, to the list of seasonal programming blocks. Cite https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXibFl16mlU as a reliable source, but don't forget to use ghostarchive.org. 134.199.113.124 (talk) 14:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Youtube videos and other user-generated content are not considered reliable sources on Wikipedia. Jamedeus (talk) 07:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are no reliable sources and there can't be a reliable source, the block should not be on the list. 134.199.113.124 (talk) 21:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi protected edit request on February 6, 2024 

message: On the "see also" section, change Nick Jr. on CBS to Nickelodeon on CBS, although it was known by the Nick Jr. name for most of its existence, the Wikipedia page for it says Nickelodeon on CBS. Also, this article is about shows that aired on Nickelodeon and not just on Nick Jr. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:1028:EE06:1CC8:9107 (talk) 04:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Rusty4321 talk contribs 05:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Protected edit request on March 19, 2024
File talk:Vilna Gaon portrait.gif

message: This image by an anonymous author is reputedly of the reclusive Vilna Gaon, and it can be found in some works about the Vilna Gaon that are nearly two hundred years old. It has been widely used in many Jewish religious and history books many times of the use, and itis highly unlikely that ther is an sort of modern day "copy right" over it. Therefore, after some consideration, the template  (Template:Fairuseunsure --- See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use: "for when use of a unique image that would be public domain unless contended to be fair use depending upon if it is subject to copyright, but the copyright status cannot or is difficult to be determined. A rationale should be provided to support this conclusion of why it cannot be determined and fair use. ie. Public domain unless fair use.") IZAK 05:07, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old sketch of Vilna Gaon