Talk:Pirs (ISS module)

message: The Johnson Space Center and NASA are United States government agencies and NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted. Cleanup maybe? DialUp 03:26, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct link is . -- Paddu 15:34, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information from [[WP:CP]] 

message: ISS docking compartment → Pirs — Module name should be used rather than its description. Target article is currently a redirect to the source article. -- GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 21:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article purports to cover the two docking compartments, both Pirs, which was made, and SO2, which was not. It would need to be re-written before Pirs became a suitable title. It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 06:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old requested move 

message: The article currently implies only Russian nationals can exit ISS via a Pirs airlock. In fact, can't anyone trained to use Orlan space suits do so? Haven't there already been nationals of countries other than Russia who have done so? Perhaps this sentence could be re-written to mention cosmonauts and "Russian Orlan space suits"? (Sdsds - Talk) 03:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, of course non-Russians who are trained in using Orlan suits can and have conducted EVAs from Pirs. On 11.23.06 Michael Lopez-Alegria did exactly that. See: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/expeditions/expedition14/exp14_eva_112206.html for the details. (Sdsds - Talk) 23:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can non-Russian wearers of Orlan space suits exit via Pirs? 

message: We need to make mention of the 2 russian Strela cranes on Pirs. They were intended for assembly of the power tower (now cancelled).  One of the cranes can be extended to reach the end of Zarya, the other can extend to the opposite site and reach the end of Zvezda. The first arm was assembled in space during STS-96 and STS-101. The 2nd was launched alongside Pirs itself. The Strela (russian for arrowhead) cranes are successors to the original MIR strela crane. I have a little bit of trouble finding a good source that has some proper info on the the cranes however. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cranes

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* Neutral I have replaced pirs redirect with a dab page. If this is renamed, please move the dab page to pirs (disambiguation) 76.66.195.190 (talk) 04:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
* Does anyone have any objection to a move to Pirs (ISS module), per earlier discussion? --GW… 17:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Hi, guys,
Something wrong with launch date here:
«Pirs was launched in August 2001.»
«Pirs was launched on September 14, 2001, as ISS Assembly Mission 4R, on a Russian Soyuz-U rocket…»
Actually the Pirs was launched on September 15 (Moscow Time), or we should make clear what time are used.Piyavkin (talk) 02:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch Date 

message: * Could there be some explanation about the separation method of Pirs ? If you just separate it from the ISS wouldn't it continue to float freely around the ISS ? How is Pirs set on a collision-free trajectory wrt to the ISS ? Hektor (talk) 10:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be quite obvious that Pirs will depart with the last Progress that docks to it. 88.85.135.235 (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not obvious to all, so is there an RS that says that ? - Rod57 (talk) 16:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pirs end of life

message: Article says "The two airlocks are used for spacewalks ..." but I had the impression that Pirs had one airlock with two EVA hatches. (eg like Poisk) & Any idea why two EVA hatches provided (if it is only one airlock) - redundancy or some need to use both at same time ? - Rod57 (talk) 16:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many airlocks and EVA hatches  

message: If I am correct, Pirs should've undocked with the ISS a few days ago, on January 25th. If this is the case, could someone please edit the article and find an appropriate source? Thanks 7REPTILLIAN7 (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Progress MS09 deorbit