Talk:Axiidea

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Axiidea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606064728/http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s21/s21rbz1-109.pdf to http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s21/s21rbz1-109.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are several more resources I have looked through in writing my draft article.
Dworschak, P. C. “Axiidea and Gebiidea (Crustacea: Decapoda) of Costa Rica.” Annalen Des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie B Für Botanik Und Zoologie, vol. 115, 2013, pp. 37–55. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/43922109
Dworschak, P.C. “Methods Collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a Review.” Annalen Des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie B Für Botanik Und Zoologie, vol. 117, 2015, pp. 5–21. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/43922304
Dworschak, P.C. “Axiidea of Panglao, the Philippines: Families Callianideidae, Eucalliacidae and Callichiridae, with a Redescription of Callianassa Calmani Nobili, 1904.” Annalen Des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie B Für Botanik Und Zoologie, vol. 120, 2018, pp. 15–40. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26335280.
Pohle, G. and Santana, W., Gebiidea and Axiidea (=Thalassinidea), in Atlas of Crustacean Larvae, Baltimore: John Hopkins Univ. Press, 2014, pp. 263–271.
Dworschak, P.C. "Infraorders Axiidea de Saint Laurent, 1979 and Gebiidea de Saint Laurent, 1979 (formerly known collectively as Thalassinidea) Treatise on Zoology - Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Crustacea, Volume 9 Part B, 2010
Based on the Dworschak "Treatise on Zoology" there are differences in what subfamilies are families within the infraorder, so I am going to edit the list of families based on this information and explain that there isn't a molecular basis for several of these subfamilies.Isabellaiwanicki (talk) 03:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi, I made some large edits to the page and filled it out. I changed the section on families based on my source, which detailed that one specific family (Gourretiidae) included in the list should not be included. I intend to give some more information on the molecular processes involved in making that decision, as it was not detailed in the source that I found. I also included sections for description, burrows, and distribution and ecology. I hope to add more information about distribution and ecology because it seems slightly short. Isabellaiwanicki (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It looks like Gourretiidae is recognized as a family now, based on the actual Gourretiidae article, and other sources, such as this one that shows Gourretiidae in the cladogram: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.0079 I can't access the links referenced on the Gourretiidae page, so I can't be sure, which is why I didn't remove the statement in this article stating that it is not a separate family.  So I just put a disputed tag in the article. Cougroyalty (talk) 21:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gourretiidae recognized as a family now?