Talk:Fathead minnow

message: I added a clearer photograph of some Rosy Reds. Enziarro 19:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum caution and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform the project members on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: ====General====
* Add more subheadings to the Breeding & Use for Determining sections
* Add more links to other Wikipedia articles
* Add to the talk page what additions you made
====Chemical Alarm Signal====
*Grammar:
** Add a comma before "which" ("releases the alarm substance, which...")
====Breeding====
*Grammar:
** Add a comma before "and" in the first sentence
** Add a comma after "includes" ("the eggs by the male includes...")
VAleles (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review

message: *Grammar:
** Add a comma before "and" in the first sentence
** Add a comma after "includes" ("the eggs by the male includes...")
VAleles (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Breeding

message: *I would definitely try to add more sections and split up the larger sections, like the one for breeding.  It would help improve the flow of the article and not have a wall of text
*Along with that, adding more transitions would also be nice in helping the flow of the article
*Perhaps add more links to other articles, such as spawn (biology) for “spawning” or adding more links to the other fishes mentioned in the article
*Edited some grammar and sentences in the breeding section
*Also added transitions within that section
*Definitely needs more references for all the information under breeding, although I’m not sure if it’s just my computer acting up
*Overall, a good start to the article but it could definitely be polished up with additional sections, links, and references. Good job!
MLiu19 (talk) 23:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits/Comments

message: Great Work!
Here are a few suggestions for improvement:
•	Include more citations in the introduction 
•	On the same subject, be sure to cite your sources in the manner that Wikipedia expects: providing a source right after a sentence with the information you are citing, rather than at the end of a long section.  Even if the entire section comes from the same source, I believe the correct way to format citations is to include the citation multiple times throughout the paragraph. 
•	I changed “Their tolerance in environmental conditions, characteristics of their life history and their popularity as bait species contribute to their widespread distribution” to “Their tolerance for multiple environmental conditions, characteristics of their life history and their popularity as bait species contribute to their widespread distribution.”
•	I think the “Habitat” and “Distribution” sections can be combined
•	I changed he capitalization in the header “Use for Determining Toxicity of Chemicals to Aquatic Animals” to “Use for determining toxicity of chemicals to aquatic animals” because Wikipedia only wants sections titles to have the first word capitalized.  However, I am not sure how much I like this title in general. Maybe you should consider shortening it?
Claire.Edelman (talk) 20:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review  

message: The general format of other GAs seems to be:
::*Intro
::*Taxonomy and pylogeny
::*Description
::*Distribution and habitat
::*Biology and ecology
::::—Most ecology-related stuff seems to be in here (e.g. diet, mating, etc.)
::*Human interaction
Specific suggestions, descending from the top:
*Introductory paragraph should be expanded to include information throughout the article
*link freshwater fish
*link or describe bait bucket releases
*link xanthic
*Is that correct usage of Schreckstoff? I.e. should it be Shreckstoff signal? Perhaps: “… producing a Schreckstoff distress signal.”
*Physical description should be Description
*link dorsal fin
*link nape
*link breeding tubercles
*add a picture showing the description. 
*Remove the picture of North America. This doesn’t really have much to do with the article if it doesn’t have a distribution overlay
*link North america
*link Chihuahua
*link Mexico
*link Maritime Provinces
*link Great Slave Lake
*link dranage
*link Canada
*link Atlantic
*link Pacific
*link basins
*link bait species
*link turbid
*link epidermal
*link club cells
*link northern pike
*Third sentence in Breeding needs work.
*link allopaternal
*link dorsal
*link mucus
*link aerates (maybe)
*removing of diseased eggs should be removal of diseased eggs
*The sentence I am referring to above is pretty confusing. 
*The sentence after that must be clarified. Is it your conjecture or someone else’s? If the latter is true, then clarify that. If the former is true, then remove it.
*continual > continuous 
*link epidermal
*Why is epidermal thickness notable?
*Why are tubercles notable? What are tubercles?
*Celsius is capitalized unnecessarily (I think). Either way, notation should probably be XºC, rather than X degrees Celcius. 
*link fractional spawners
*Your description of fractional spawning makes it seem as if spawning around 18ºC means it’s a fractional spawner. Your causation/definition should be turned around
*”Use for determining …” could probably be moved to a “Human interactions” section. The content about aquarium trade should be in that section
*All internal links should be formatted as text, rather than [url text], as the latter are treated as external links. If you look at your article render, those links have a padlock next to them. E.g. oestradiol should be formatted as oestradiol, rather than oestradiol.
*link effluents, steroidal, plasma, testicular, somatic
*You cite “normal behavior” in the event of low pH, then cite stress behaviors. Clarify.
*link turgidity
*link or describe cattle feedlot effluent
*This last paragraph seems to be a restatement of what you’ve already written
*Importance to humans should probably be “Human interactions”
*link Arkansas
*link breeding farms (to fish breeding farms)
*link toxicology, EPA, vertebrate, Europe, trout, eel
General suggestions
*All title headings should have caps first letter and lower case for all else
*Add pictures
*Consider adding a distribution map. Wikipedia has an article/tutorial about that somewhere. 
*Add a taxonomy section
*Clean up the organization. The last three sections can probably be put into one. 
*Modify your sections to match more closely to other GAs. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles/Natural_sciences#Animals for a list of all GA animals  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bakerb4379 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review, Nov 24 2013 

message: Substituted at 19:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment