lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fletcher's Canal

message: I am attempting to source images for use on this page. Parrot of Doom 23:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have sourced some old images.  One is on this page, the others are in the Wikimedia Commons.  I still intend to cycle down and get some up to date shots. Parrot of Doom 15:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, I went and got some new images.  The canal was pretty difficult to find, it was completely overgrown.  I wanted to get the shot of the aqueduct and viaduct together but growth along the riverbank makes that shot impossible.  Maybe next time I'll take a chainsaw....  Anyway the images are all on Wikimedia commons Parrot of Doom 21:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Map added - I'll update it with more information as I find it.   Parrot of Doom 09:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Mounted search and rescue

message: Peer review requested on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disaster management and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fire Service. --Una Smith (talk) 22:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review

message: * I'd like to hear more about different units.  How about some notable cases (online newspaper archives rock) where MSAR made a difference?
* I added a couple of fact tags.
* Go through Google Books and find some more sources.
* How has technology changed MSAR?  Is it growing or waning in popularity?
Overall, what you have is a good start, but it could be so much more. Jclemens (talk) 22:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! --Una Smith (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things to add 

message: Yes, let's.  Montanabw(talk) 20:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Allocation questionnaire

message: An IP user removed references to the use in "discovery" and in "small claims courts."  I think this is not a glaring error.  Can anyone find any citations to such usage? Bearian (talk) 00:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Discovery is a technical term used in English legal practice that is now used to mean the provision of copies of documents (or in some cases the documents themselves) to another party to litigation. The allocation questionnaire is not a form of provision of document in that sense. There is no such thing as a small claim court in England and Wales, though the term is often used loosely to the county court using the small claims track, there is a big difference in reality. You can't chose the small claims track and anything that happens before allocation (and much can) will not be on that track and so not subject to things like the no costs rule or the right to have a lay representative. I've known people get a big shock from that. There is absolutely no such thing as a District Court. No idea where that came from. Francis Davey (talk) 17:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery, small claims
Template talk:WikiProject Electronic music

message: The documentation mentions the listas parameter, but it doesn't apper in the template source and I'm getting a "" error. I assume it should be there and is just missing for some reason, in which case, could it be added? Please and thank you. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 00:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Added  to gain attention from an editor who can add  to the template or give us the OK to remove  from the documentation.  Thanks!  GoingBatty (talk) 04:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done Harryboyles 08:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listas
Talk:Assisted person

message: Bearian 23:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Attachment of earnings

message: Bearian 23:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Contradictio in adjecto

message: Bearian 23:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Contradictio in adjecto is Latin for Contradiction of adjectives. Moshe-paz (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literal translation 
Talk:Upuaut Project

message: Ok, we have this - way too small- article about these shafts. We also have one about the 2011 attempt:Djedi Project. But what about the 2002 attempt?:  see this article. This one should have enough encyclopedic value for another article i guess. There is some information about it at the main article (great pyramid of gizah) anyway.--Narayan (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that the Djedi Project was the 2002 attempt. --Steinninn 05:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three attempts
Talk:Last antecedent rule

message: It's quite unreadable. "It feels like an incredibly complex way of explaining a simple concept," agrees a friend who works in the law. Equinox ◑ 01:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This REALLY needs at least one example
Talk:Townsend's big-eared bat

message: Recently, GeForce3 has generously expanded this stub, so you might want to check on his work and consider whether this is still a stub or not. Ok? Thanks (Orfo (talk) 04:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded stub 

message: It would be helpful to have a list of previous latin names, (plecotus townsendii) with the date of acceptance of change, and a reference to the reason for the change.  It gives a better sense of how things fit and why.  Also, it's useful when searching, when one only knows one name which might be archaic.
Aefields (talk) 04:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old latin names? 
Talk:Top Spin 3

message: Where is the information about the player list from?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leonidas1982 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  In examining the articles about the game it appears the only confirmed players are Federer, Nalbandian, Berdych, Monfils, Blake, Henin and Sharapova.  Unless someone can show another source, thatSmall Text's it.  Agrippina Minor (talk) 21:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

text: As much as I would like to see those players in the game, lets try as much to keep the article accurate.--Leonidas1982 (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I, myself, am curious.  Apart from Federer, Blake, Nalbandian, Monfils, and a few others, which are on offical screenshots, I am not sure which source has the other players.--Leonidas1982 (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for players 

message: Roger Federer, Andy Roddick, and Maria Sharapova are confirmed.  http://www.tothegame.com/boxshot.asp?picnum=uk&id=7042 --Leonidas1982 (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, but I am not pleased with the roster so far.  I have a feeling that more players are to be announced.--Leonidas1982 (talk) 00:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would imagine so. Who posted this comment? You Leonidas?--Hammerandclaw (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah.  Although its weird that Nadal is PS3 exclusive.--Leonidas1982 (talk) 00:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirmed

message: How can the unlocked points be utilized?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.122.23.22 (talk) 02:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unlocked Points 

message: The article mentions that a playble area is Wimbledon. There is no Wimbledon in the game. There is only some tournament in Dublin or something like that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.31.179.87 (talk) 09:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wimbledon is not in the game
Talk:Public consultation

message: :There are 24 entries in seven subsections in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion. 
*ELpoints #3) states: 
*LINKFARM states: 
*WP:ELMIN: .
:Trim links and remove 2013 tag. -- Otr500 (talk) 02:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Started reorganizing the article with renamed headers and addressing issues outlined in the page's templates Superb Owl (talk) 00:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2023 - reorganization, major edits, template removal
Talk:Antiope (character)

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
Talk:Penang F.C.

message: What does E&O stand for?
Eastern & Oriental Hotel is the major sponsor for Pahang—Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.121.126 (talk) 07:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Both page is identical. Consider merging them or have only a single page. KillerservTalk 11:57, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[FA Penang]] 

message: jeckson f tiago
36.83.115.131 (talk) 04:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 04:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2014 
Talk:Wyomissing Hills, Pennsylvania

message: An anonymous user claims that Wyomissing Hills no longer exists.  That may very well be the case, but I cannot find any information about the supposed-former borough.  What happened to it?  Was it annexed by a neighboring borough or township?  All I know is that the Berks County website does not list it on its list of municipalities, but the U.S. Census Bureau does.    I believe that this article should stay up until someone can dig up some verifiable information about this place: what (if anything) happened to it, when did it happen, and why did it happen. Until this information is found (and I will do some research myself) I do not think it is appropriate to redirect the borough's article out of existence, based only off of the edit summary of an anonymous user.  "Country" Bushrod Washington 00:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wyomissing Hills merged into Wyomissing in January, 2002. I added a reference for this to Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. Ergbert (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Exists?
Talk:Public housing in the United States and Canada

message: The San Francisco portion of this article has a couple of things that may need to be addressed:
1) Several of the listed projects are just the names of large neighborhoods themselves, which have projects in them. This includes Hunters Point, Potrero Hill, North Beach, and Hayes Valley.
2) Geneva Towers were demolished on May 15, 1998 and replaced. This site contains both the date and pictures of the demolition: http://www.sfsu.edu/~jtolson/tower/photos.htm. I don't know if this warrants removing the reference, or simply noting that the Towers no longer exist.
Does anyone else think this should be edited?
24.5.143.19 00:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: San Francisco

message: I added most of the Boston family developments (not the eldery/assisted living ones) that were left out of the article, fixed the grammar, and alphabetized by development name. BostonFenian (talk) 09:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Boston
Talk:Casualty of war

message: Hi. I created this because there seemed to be a need to discuss casualties of war. Most of what I found already on Wikipedia was concerning civilian casualties during war, but very little about military killed in action. Or to put it another way, it seems like there should be an article that serves as a general overview of the topic of all casualties of war, then branches into, perhaps, military vs. civilian, and then offers some statistics. This is way outside my knowledge spread, and frankly outside my interests. I'm just speaking as an outsider looking for some knowledge. I created a starting point, and I realize it's only a very, very tiny stub. I see potential for it, but if it comes up for AfD, then I have no opinion. It just seems like something should be here, so I created a starting point for someone to expand from. Good luck! --Willscrlt (Talk) 00:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created a starting point for others
Talk:Ramesh Balsekar/Archive 1

message: ok.... this page neeed some work.... let's make it an article instead of a big quote. I will start trasnlating the quotes into a description of what he teachers. Sethie 15:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The quotes removed have taken out the flavour of his actual teaching, replacing it with a generic teaching of that school which isn't really a good presentation. I'll try to bring the flavor of them back in, without the full length. FT2 (Talk | email) 09:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs work 

message: I am in agreement that WP:BLP forbids the use of this source while Ramesh is still alive. Sethie (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conoway as a Source

message: this article seems to be very selective and does not take into account other sides of Ramesh Balsekar and his biography, that are important for readers to form an unbiased view. 
There is a great deal of controversy on his teachings and behavior. This should be mentioned in the wiki article. 
At the very least, the sources below should be mentioned.
<http://www.enlightened-spirituality.org/ramesh_balsekar.html>
<http://www.enlightennext.org/magazine/j14/balsekar.asp?page=3>
Incogni (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, after reading Conway's materials, it should be added to this article. Will do so now. -47.220.46.75 (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  controversy on Ramesh
Talk:Royal Yacht Squadron

message: The fourth paragraph in the History section is not up to the standard of the article. The grammar is poor, the notability is doubtful, and I can't find the word "forred" anywhere other than the quoted source. I assume it's a variant of "forward" but I have no way of knowing. I believe the article would benefit from the removal of the passage. --ӎᴀʀ ₲₳ƝϪѲƝƋ 13:21, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph on "The Royal Yacht Club in a fix"
Template talk:User dum-3

message: Why isn't this in Middle Dutch?
"Dese gebruucer spreect uutsteecent Middeldiets", 
"Dese gebruycker spreeckt uytstekend Middeldietsch",
"Diese gebruecer spreect uetstecend Middeldiets" or something like that; anyway, important is, "spreekt" should be "spreect", "Middelnederlands" should be "Middeldiets(ch)" and "ui"-diphtonges don't exist. Of course it also depends on the age: "gebruecer" was used very early (11th-12th c.), while "gebruycker" was used much later (15th-16th c.), and on the region: Flemish is "Dese", while Limburgish would be "Diese", etc...
Just an idea - correct me if I'm wrong ;-) -- Lord Snoeckx 01:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Christos Gage

message: The article reads neutrally enough, for the most part, but it's essentially a laundry list of "He wrote this. Then he wrote this." No context, no third-party perspective, and a lot of that prose is unnecessary since there's a bibliography that takes up most of the article. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag
Talk:Central Park Conservancy

message: It would seem there should be enough material for it to be a separate, but linked entry
: I agree. Binarybits (talk) 16:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  why is this linked to Central Park? 
Talk:Goldfinger (film)/to do

message: Here are some things you can do to get Goldfinger (film) to GA status.
:Feel free to strike out anything completed, but please do not sign your name.
*In Awards section, cite (use official Academy Awards site, and BAFTA)
*In Soundtrack section, add a summary of what the Goldfinger (soundtrack) page provides, cite
*There dosen't need to be a See Also section
*The Reception and Release section may be merged into one
*The Release/Reception section needs sources, 
*Check out Casino Royale (2006 film) for how to do the cast section correctly.
**Half of the cast arne't notable enough to get a mention
**Add a link to List of James Bond henchmen in Goldfinger and List of James Bond allies in Goldfinger 
*The plot section is too long, it must be shortened, preferbaly re-written.
*The final paragraph of Effects has the sam source right through the paragraph, just use the one source at the end of the paragraph.
**That paragraph is probably a little too long.
*Filming could probably be expanded
:The above was added by SpecialWindler talk 02:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:J. J. Milan

message: This article fails WP:ATHLETE.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  19:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD 
Talk:WSJ

message: WSJ has redirected to The Wall Street Journal for years now.  I know you think that Weekly Shonen Jump is just as important, but it's not.  From Google searches:
* 1 - 10 of about 305 for wsj weekly-shonen-jump
* 1 - 10 of about 58,400,000 for WSJ Wall-street-journal
** 1 - 10 of about 909,000 from wsj.com for WSJ Wall-street-journal
So, 305 references to wsj with Weekly Shonen Jump and over 57,000,000 for wsj with Wall Street Journal, discounting the WSJ's own site.  I added WSJ (disambiguation), which is linked at the top of the Wall Street Journal page.  I think this is, by far the best solution. — wfaulk 02:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall Street Journal/Weekly Shonen Jump
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/San Francisco 2

message: Is there a trustees meeting in SF or something?  There seem to be a lot of high profile, out-of-town people coming on short notice.  Dragons flight 02:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the show of force?

message: 'Cuz I would have driven there but I guess it's too late :) —  $PЯIПGrαgђ  03:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: come to the next one! phoebe/(talk)  04:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When is the next one in SF? Marlith T/C 19:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I wish I had known about this before
Talk:The Alien (unproduced film)

message: I am not sure I see the relevance of a film that was never completed. Is it an attempt at claiming priority status over ET or something? The Last Heretic (talk) 05:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article also covers Bankubabur Bandhu, the story which the movie was going to be based on. There are also plenty of other cancelled films which have their own articles. Jagged 85 (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as it has news coverage, it qualifies as notable.  Dream Focus 00:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support Alien_(creature_in_Alien_franchise) has been viewed 77081 times in the last 30 days.  The_Alien has been viewed 2620 times in the last 30 days.  So obvious the more likely search target should be the one it goes to, if it is actually referred to anywhere as "the alien".  I think most just type in "alien".  Anyway, sending it the disambiguate page makes sense.  Dream Focus 02:06, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Quoted from a book by Ray (or the Times of India? unclear, really ...) it's claimed  there are "parallels include the physical nature of the alien" between Spielberg's ET and Ray's Alien, because Ray described his alien as "a cross between a gnome and a famished refugee child: large head, spindly limbs, a lean torso. Is it male or female or neuter? We don't know. What its form basically conveys is a kind of ethereal innocence, and it is difficult to associate either great evil or great power with it; yet a feeling of eeriness is there because of the resemblance to a sickly human child." I think this claim is completely unsustainable, especially when you look at Ray's Sketch of his alien, which looks nothing like ET, and basically all physical features he describes are common places of the Grey alien/Little green men trope, so both Spielberg and Ray just used stereotypical portrayals of extraterrestrials way older than 1967 with no distinct similarities. I think we should delete this passage because some readers could think Ray invented that stereotype. --2A02:1210:248C:1500:C968:389C:B6B0:51B1 (talk) 15:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   Alleged physical parallels between ET and Ray's alien
Talk:Bailando por un Sueño (Argentine TV series)

message: Perhaps this could be translated:-
La sexta edición del certamen de baile comenzó en el segundo programa de Showmatch, el 4 de Mayo a las 22.30 hs. y se emite martes, jueves y viernes por Canal Trece siendo conducido por Marcelo Tinelli, como en las ediciones anteriores. En esta temporada, las parejas participantes (integrada por un famoso y un bailarin desconocido) son 29. Silvina Escudero fue la primera en obtener junto a su soñador un total de 50 puntos en la ronda del ritmo árabe. Los nombres que aparecen en color Azul es por que esas personas son conocidas y tienen archivos en Wikipedia.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Season 6

message: If 2012 was the eighth season and 2014 is the ninth, what happened to 2013? (Did they think it would be bad luck?) The gap should be explained. --Thnidu (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013? 
Talk:Corumbataia

message: FishBase, used as a reference in this article, does not use initials in author citations for any of the species in this genus (Scientific Names where Genus Equals Corumbataia); neither does Catalog of Fishes, another major fish database which FishBase itself very often uses as a reference regarding taxonomy & nomenclature (Species in the genus Corumbataia).
From the WP article on author citation:
:"If the same surname is common to more than one author, initials are sometimes given" but "not all animal groups / databases use this convention" and "it should be noted that in the examples given in the Code and also the ICZN Official Lists and Indexes, initials are not used". XenoVon (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author citation
Category talk:Neurophysiology

message: Okay, so user:clicketyclack has made the point that neurology is a larj category.
That isn't enough reason to make it hard for people to find articles on the topic.
Also, it is not only a medical discipline, and the distinction between neuroscience and neurology has no consequence. IOW, articles classified under neuroscience will be of interest to the profession. Brewhaha@edmc.net 02:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Neurologists won't only be looking under the Neurology category for articles of professional interest.  It's a multi-disciplinary field, so when browsing categories they'll be looking in Neurology, other branches of medicine, Neuroscience, Psychology, etc.  Can you give an example of a specific article that you think is hard for a neurologist to find, owing to its present categorization?  Clicketyclack 05:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Towards a better way to organize this mess.
Talk:Root rot

message: To my knowledge, black root rot spores are NOT airborne (unless you count when soil gets so dry it becomes dust and they travel with the dust). On the other hand, Annosus root rot has airborne spores. That's about all I know.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.211.158.203 (talk) 17:12, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airborne?
Talk:Boudewijn Poelmann

message: This article was mentioned in the Dec. 2008 Articles for Cleanup log. I am doing my best to remove as much unsourced material from this page while keeping the article coherent. Sorry if it looks like a lot got removed. 
According to the Cleanup log, this article reads like a resume. More sources need to be found. See above (the text box) for information regarding the Living Persons requirements. You *must* have lots of reliable sources, not just one external link. Also, please avoid peacock terms. Thanks. Murphy2010 (talk) 01:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Did some more work on this. Normalized the language and wikified. Removed subjective language as well. --Lendorien (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup