lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Theory of Moral Sentiments

message: Where are summaries of parts II-IV????????????????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.169.55.94 (talk) 16:54, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summaries 

message: Can someone find those chapter references, for the quotes stuck into the article? Wikidea 13:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: This article seems far too in-depth; it's very hard to read. I think summaries should be limited to whole parts, rather than breaking them into sections and chapters. Each part is fairly unified. The quotations are too long as well. obbst (talk) 07:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: In "The Impartial Spectator" by D.D. Raphael, he spends some time writing about the significance of Smith's 6th version revision. Notably, Smith's 1st version was published in 1759. "The Wealth of Nations" was published in 1776, and then the 6th edition was published in 1790. This is significant, because it shows that Smith was re-affirming this work post "Wealth of Nations," and because this 6th edition included an entirely new part, Part VI: The Character of Virtue. For this reason, this article should reflect the 6th, not the 4th edition, with special attention given to the inclusion of this new section in the months immediately preceding his death. --Elliott Shultz (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be revised to cover the 6th edition. 

message: The article was very detailed and may benefit from some summary revisions 
— Gtiedy (talk) 22:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can you tell if the article is a part of any wiki projects? 

message: It's been incomplete and relatively incoherent to an uninformed reader since 2009. It may just need to be rewritten from the ground up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prince Duke Electorate (talk • contribs) 04:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honestly what is going on with this article
Talk:San Da

message: ===Spelling to use as main article===
I think this article should be placed under Sanda, or Sanda (martial art) (because of the other uses of "sanda"). Google gives many more hits on ["sanda" "martial art"] than ["san da" "martial art"].
- Wintran 11:03, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling and romanization

message: I think this article should be placed under Sanda, or Sanda (martial art) (because of the other uses of "sanda"). Google gives many more hits on ["sanda" "martial art"] than ["san da" "martial art"].
- Wintran 11:03, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling to use as main article

message: Whatever spelling and name is chosen, this article and the one for "San shou" need to be merged so they stop developing independently, creating redundant content.
I suppose chosing a single spelling will be a good start towards figuring out what page should be the main one.
Aesopian 15:24, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The San shou and San Da article need to be merged
Talk:Shell plc/Archive 1

message: I have changed the default name to Shell not Shell Oil since the latter is US specific and elsewhere in the world Shell Oil means lubricants. 
I struggle to be neutral since before leacing to work for a charity I was a senior manager in Shell but have attempted to balance the comments a little. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BozMo (talk • contribs) 11:07, 22 April 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsorted text

message: I'm bolding company names as they appear for the first time in the article. - Jerryseinfeld 19:29, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold company names 

message: Do you think this needs to be updated to reflect the 2003-2005 scandals with how Shell accounted for reserves? The scandal led to the firing of several top officers, as well as the reorganization of corporate structure. It seems like the event would be important enough to merit a big reference in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Feco (talk • contribs) 00:47, 25 March 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Accounting Scandals
Talk:Émile Louis

message: "Statutory" rape?  From the way this article describes the situation, the rape of his stepdaughter wasn't consenting (i.e. statutory).  Wouldn't he have been convicted of "rape of a minor" rather than "statutory rape?" --Modemac 20:48, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that you weren't looged in when you made this comment, so I think you were reading an out-dated version of the article. I fleshed out the introduction just yesterday. :) fabiform | talk 08:14, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michael Jackson (actor)

message: "the number one indie-rock band in Canada" ??   A little NPOV don't ya think?
who the hell is roderick, millman or covey?
Most famous for his role as Hobo with a shotgun?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.205.37.98 (talk) 04:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Duct tape

message: Please note that the debate on duct/duck has been going on for 15 years. The first comment on this talk page was on April 22, 2004. You can review all of the discussions at Talk:Duct tape/Archive 1. Any argument you want to make has probably been used before. - Donald Albury 19:40, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old discussion 

message: Does this article belong in wikiproject Industrial design? -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 21:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industrial design? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 17:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: pages with content, such as :Duck tape, are ineligible to be proposed titles in move requests unless they, too, are formally dispositioned. ":Duck tape → Deleted to make way for page move" has been added to this request to meet that requirement. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 01:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose. You're correct about your points, but I don't see any reason to override WP:COMMONNAME here. WPscatter t/c 19:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's not the common name. This article is legendary as a resource for pedants who don't know any better to attempt to school people who use the actual most common name, which is the requested target. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll have to provide a source for such a claim. Results for "duct tape" on Google search outnumber the alternative nearly sevenfold, and around double on Ngrams (and notably have seemingly always shared that approximate relation). WPscatter t/c 21:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 September 2023
Talk:Mumbai Suburban Railway

message: Mumbai has got the countries first AC local train on 25th December 2017. Please add the same to the article. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add AC local train information 

message: I was taking a look at the article until I noticed that in the Mumbai Suburban Railway#History section of the page, it was written that "The first train was run by the Great Indian Peninsula Railway (now Central Railway) between Bori Bunder (now Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus) and Thane, a distance of 34 km (21 mi), on 16 April 1853 at 15:35. The 14-coach train took 1.25 hr to complete the 34 km (21 mi) journey, with a halt at Bhandup to refill the train's water tanks." 
However, the citation which was given at the end of the line led to this website: http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_central-railway-puts-15-car-locals-on-track_1753241, which stated that the train took "57 minutes" to complete the "32" km journey to Thane, with a halt at "Sion" to take in the water. 
I assumed that it was just a mistake and corrected the article, but after doing further research online, various sources show different distances between Bori Bunder and Thane, different times it took to travel from Bori Bunder & Thane and different stops where the water tank was filled. 
Wikipedia should always have right information, which is why I am asking this: Which source should Wikipedia trust?
Helper who is a human (talk) 11:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first train run by the Central Railway
Talk:George Price

message: ----
(Gah. How'd I do that? Reverted my own changes, sorry! DS 14:29, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: Where's my famous father? Who's going to look into this? What's going on here? Unfree (talk) 22:52, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The famous one, Georgie Price, actually named George Edwards Price after Gus Edwards adopted him
Talk:E. A. Speiser

message: Though you would not guess it from the article, Professor Speiser appears to be significant in Biblical translation and/or Biblical archaeology. Just thought I'd say this before anyone deleted the article. DJ Clayworth 17:10, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is why I made a link to his name in the first place. (And should be linked to from a number of other articles.) Unfortunately, all I know about him is that he has made a number of translations from Akkadian & Hebrew, & died several years ago. -- llywrch 23:53, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)

text: I've added a bit about his Biblical translation. 81.134.14.236 21:59, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of Jewish comic book characters

message: I feel that the list should be kept as uniform as possible. At this point I think that we should either have flavor text (short descriptions) for all, or for none. At this point I think that erring for none should suffice. The superheroes/characters listed have their own pages for detailed information, and I think comics publishers suffice for information. Etzedek24 (talk) 03:39, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts on superhero summaries? 

message: I once read some interesting speculation (not sure where) that Superman had to be Jewish, in light of the "el" in "Kal-El" and the fact that his creators (at least one of them) were Jewish. DC Comics, as far as I know, has never commented on this speculation. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Superman
Talk:Slate (magazine)

message: Should be moved to notable "past" contributors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.165.82 (talk) 07:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Christopher Hitchens

message: The Fray comments section available at the end of most articles provided an early and very (for it's time) technically sophisticated forum for commentary by the readership. many news websites have this now but I believe Slate was an early adopter. The Fray was a point of difference with other upmarket magazines moving online. It would be a useful addition if some Slate afficionado could add material to the main page about this. They might even win a star.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.175.209.142 (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reference to "the Fray" 

message: Is Slate a left wing magazine?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.79.100.32 (talk) 10:12, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left wing 

message: I'd like to recommend adding Rebecca Schuman to this list. In accordance with the WikiProject Magazines' writing guide, these sections (if they exist at all) should include only those contributors whose "involvement with the magazine . . . has generated coverage in independent reliable sources." Schuman's work has been covered on NPR and in The Chronicle of Higher Education, Minneapolis Star Tribune, and many other sources. Any thoughts? DinzdalePR (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with DinzdalePR that Schuman should get a page here. Srm16 (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I disagree because although Schuman may have a few credentials, she still needs a few more to get her own page. Bmurph331 (talk) 15:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable contributors and their departments 

message: The article on Panoply Media, of which Slate is a parent company, is being considered for deletion. Your fellow editors are seeking more opinions on this discussion.  Morganfitzp (talk) 03:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panoply?
Talk:The Breathing Method

message: WARNING MASSIVE SPOILER
In expanding the synopsis I dropped the part about the patient, Sandra, being decapitated before giving birth, since that's, like, the "final twist" which is the whole point of reading the story, a la a Twilight Zone episode. Any thoughts? --209.149.235.254 20:18, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: A blast from the past - yours truly made this comment when I was an anonymous noob. Obviously under WP policy as it's developed over the years it's proper to discuss the story in full. Thanks to all for not biting. Ellsworth (talk) 03:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Larkin

message: I was trying to fix the link from the Buck Rogers page as the John Larkin who was the last radio voice of Buck is not Scatman John but IMDB list 6 John Larkins - none which mention the Buck Rogers Radio show -although John Larkin (VI) was the radio voice of Perry Mason. Maybe he's the right one. Rmhermen 20:40, Apr 22, 2004 (UTC)
Think that the radio Perry Mason was the first TV Mike Carr of The Edge of Night, since it was essentially a daytime soap opera Perry Mason, espcially at first.  That John Larkin died fairly early in the run of Edge of Night.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlquall (talk • contribs) 01:14, 29 August 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: According to IMDB, Larkin died in 1965 but left the EON role in 1961. Mike H 01:16, Aug 29, 2004 (UTC)
There is a guy from ballyshannon, in ireland who's an amazing singer... he's john larkin too way better than the scatman—Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.134.220.242 (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Each entry among the following should, when an article is written for it, be copied to the accompanying Dab page (and, in many cases, edited there to conform to MoSDab), and the copy struck thru.--Jerzy•t 08:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed RedLink'd entries
Template talk:Weapons of mass destruction

message: Adding Egypt to the list int he template since starting the page Egypt and weapons of mass destruction so it now has somethign to point to. I am basing this off the conversation in the Archive 1 which raised this point. Dexcel (talk) 04:46, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egypt 

message: The image on the Infobox is incorrect, the skull stand for "toxic" not "chemical".  I suggest we use a different image and change this image.  Thanks IQ125 (talk) 16:53, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Should Rhodesia and weapons of mass destruction be added to the list of countries? Currently no other former countries are listed (e.g. not the Soviet Union), and Rhodesia wasn't widely recognized even when it existed. On the other hand, it shouldn't be added as "Zimbabwe" since Zimbabwe had nothing to do with the weapons. Huon (talk) 00:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhodesia 

message: === Italian nuclear weapons program.Italy can be set in the list ===
Italy to be added at the list of countries.Italian nuclear weapons program.80.181.119.244 (talk) 07:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: It appears this list only includes pages that have "...and weapons of mass destruction" in the title. The page you provided falls out of that requirement. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

text: Done Reversing my initial decision as I did not see how other countries' articles were titled. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 20:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2017 

message: Italy to be added at the list of countries.Italian nuclear weapons program.80.181.119.244 (talk) 07:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: It appears this list only includes pages that have "...and weapons of mass destruction" in the title. The page you provided falls out of that requirement. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

text: Done Reversing my initial decision as I did not see how other countries' articles were titled. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 20:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian nuclear weapons program.Italy can be set in the list 

message: Redmary73 (talk) 20:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done The addition is sneakily hidden away towards the right of the box. Please refresh your page or clear your cache if you still can't see it. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

text: Also, please do not continue to post messages on my Talk page. You are annoying me and clogging up my e-mail. It's just as easy to continue discussions on Talk pages like this. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the history tab. It was added at 20:49 over 25 minuets before this post so Jd22292 was clearly not lying.--76.65.42.75 (talk) 21:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2017
Talk:List of works in critical theory

message: Nice page! I couldn't believe Northrop Frye was forgotten, though. It's ironic that (so far) he falls in alphabetically next to Foucault ;)
--JECompton 00:06, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This list includes a variety of primary texts from various fields of theory plus various secondary introductory texts. For some of the primary writers, it is not clear why these texts rather than others (e.g. Baudrillard)? In sort nothing to indicate reasons for inclusion or omission, hence the notice.  AllyD (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-Up Notice
Talk:USS Enterprise (CV-6)

message: The ship's wheel, as I recall, and other bridge-emplaced items, are on public display at the (wonderful) National Naval Aviation Museum at Pensacola.  I've asked them to provide a citable source for their holdings. DulcetTone (talk) 23:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: More remaining artifacts well worth mentioning

message: Ya know, , had I come across this edit before you, I think I might have just let it stand, (along with a "cite needed" tag, of course). Even now, if I have some free time, I think I might just hunt around a bit and see if there are any sources about to support the statement in that edit. It's not necessarily wrong. (imho) - wolf 04:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it's wrong, for a neutral encyclopedia anyway, as it's an opinion.  would be appropriate in an op-ed, a blog, a fan site, or even on the Naval History and Heritage Command website, but it's not appropriate in Wikipedia's voice. BilCat (talk) 04:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, of course it needn't be worded in that exact way. But if there was something to reflect the disappointment that the old gal couldn't be saved, then I, and I'm sure others, would like to see that added. (JHMO) - wolf 05:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's completely different. As written, though, it could not remain, even with a  tag. BilCat (talk) 05:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone should find a quote from some "significant" person that conveys the same sentiment. 2601:7C0:C500:3540:F8E2:FB6:DF4B:FE2A (talk) 02:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrapping 

message: I notice that her flight deck has a runway number of "9."  Was there a technical reason for that?  Or was it symbolic "Always face westward" kind of thing?  Fephisto (talk) 17:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a "6", as in " CV-6". BilCat (talk) 18:03, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: My god do I feel dumb.  Fephisto (talk) 22:01, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runway Number
Talk:John Wesley Harding

message: There is a  on the statement that "All Along the Watchtower" has a VI - V - IV chord progression. Actually, it's VIm - V - IV - V, so I will we should probably correct it. I believe Dylan plays it Am - G - F - G and Hendrix plays it Cm - B♭ - A♭ - B♭. But how on earth do you cite for such a thing? Cite the sheet music, or what? - Jmabel | Talk 04:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed for chord progression? 

message: The legacy section shifts into a partial biography of Dylan and I think should be cleaned up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtdunlop (talk • contribs) 13:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy section
Talk:World Cup Golden Boot

message: I have always heard the award given to the player who scored the most goals at a football world cup referred to as the Golden Boot, however there is a case suggesting that it is properly called the Golden Shoe, as shown on the official FIFA website...
I would be interested to hear any other opinions. Calexico (Talk) 17:52, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: Reason: Football World Cup Awards already covers this (plus other awards). No need to have two articles with the same information. Chanheigeorge 19:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep!!! Sebastian Kessel Talk 19:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Completed? Then Why is this here? By the way, don't merge as the Golden Boot might not necessarily be a FIFA award  Paddy :-) 14:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose merge to [[Football World Cup Awards]]
Talk:Wizards (Movie)

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 22 to Apr 29 2004, consensus was to keep.  Discussion:
I created this page as wanted by the Ralph Bakshi article and as a reference form the wizard article.  However, I mis-understood the convention on _(movie) vs. _(Movie) for disambiguation (case sensitivity in unexpected places).  Ergo I moved the content and would like to clean up after my own mess. (Mea culpae! I'll try to be more careful in the future).JimD 22:57, 2004 Apr 22 (UTC)
It's fine as a redirect.  Keep.  RickK 02:45, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-listed this on as per Cyrius' statement.JimD 00:16, 2004 Apr 24 (UTC)
*Keep the redirect. Good for handling Wikipedia's case sensitivity. Niteowlneils 23:31, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC)