Talk:Ghosh/Archive 1

message: Hello,
I have reverted this page to the revised version developed with the help of a number of contributors.
I hope the previous author can understand the points highlighted above with respect to choice of pages
1. More encyclopaedic style
2. Clearer separation of three types of ghosh families and associated histories
3. The same problems with verification as the older version, but heavily tagged in the hope of an expert turning up
If you have a better sourced version of this page please do make changes, and let us know what you have done.
Many thanks,
57.66.51.74 13:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back to revised version 

message: Manythanks to the user who added the great information on baro Bhuyian. 
I have have taken the liberty of rephrasing some of the addtions I hope this is OK - please revert if I have misinterpreted your additons.
Also it would be great if we could get any references you have used into the article?
Many, many thanks,
A212.22.230.43 13:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baro Bhuyian 

message: Dear editors,
Many thanks for all your contributions and for moving this page on a great deal.
I would echo the requests of the editor above for us to try to add references for existing and updated information. 
We are now at a stage where we need to start adding depth to the information on the page. This can only be done with verifiable facts, although it is fasinating to hear about peoples' family histories here on the talk page!
Also the Sadgope Ghosh section is I believe integral to the article as they are on of the key groups of people with a ghosh surname.
Mr IGhosh, my family are also shoukalin Ghosh and as such will not marry other shoukalin Ghoshes, but what I am not clear on is whether all kaystha ghoshes are shoukalin or not? My family history as we know it is detialed above.
I would ask all editors to use this talk page to discuss their changes, and please try to change opinion for fact (with references) rather than just opinion for opinion. As we do not yet have references of our statements presenting the information with qualifiers may be more appropriate than presenting information as undisputable fact. (e.g. "all" to "many", "the majority" to "a significant proportion" - unless we have some data to support the more definitive statement).
Many thanks,
AnitFonoq35 10:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for sources 

message: i59.95.105.255 10:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  rajput ghosh 

message: Hi previously you were being very rude...
But now you have done it properly by putting information in the encyclopedia...
It would be better now if some editor would correct his english for otherwise his ideas doesnt seem to have been transferred properly to other people...
I certainly identify to some of his idea...
Namely --> Arrival during Ballal Sen's time
       --> A lost war, to the mughals(or muslims as i've heard)
Can any other GHOSH please correlate with these? Do you have any similar ancestry stories... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.164.117.133 (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello AVRANJAN 

message: I am GHOSH, and Alimayan gotra...
My grandfathers tell I am UGRA KSHATRIYA...
Can you tell by my gotra I am what?
Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.164.117.133 (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi Can aanyone help me out with this please? 

message: What is the difference beween Rajput and UGRA KSHATRIYA? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.164.117.96 (talk) 12:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question? 

message: rajput is one who is king or soldier of rajasthan.not in every state
kshtriyas are also regarded same but they are living on different
placelike bose,ghosh,ray and guha —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Avranjan ghosh (talk • contribs) 09:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This Is the DIfference

message: While the discussion is very interesting it is a shame no one has attempted to correct the article with its atrocious spelling and poor grammar. Much of its makes no sense. I would love to edit it but fear i will delete important information or mis translate it as i cannot understand all of the articles. Please could somone who is more confident sort this out —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.41.202.121 (talk) 10:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  APALLING STATE OF THE ARTICLE