Talk:List of Chinese administrative divisions by GDP per capita

message: Does the figure for Fujian exclude Quemoy, Wuchiu, Matsu, etc.? — Instantnood 19:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fujian

message: The previous practice of converting HK, MO and TW rates to Yuan doesn't make sense, because:
* The conversion from HK$, MO$ and NT$ to US$ is by PPP;
* But the conversion from US$ to RMB is by exchange rate.
As a result, those figures cannot be used as a basis for comparison.
What I'm doing instead is:
* The conversion from HK$, MO$ and NT$ to US$ is by PPP;
* The conversion from RMB to US$ is also by PPP.
This way the figures can be compared to each other, while acknowledging issues like different prices in different regions, etc.
-- ran (talk) 00:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding PPP conversion 

message: It is doubtful that PPP rates for the Shanghai	and Beijing are the same as for the rest of the country. Using the same coefficient for these areas is likely to overestimate the PPP. Is there any specific data available for the cost of living in these cities?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.206.66.120 (talk) 22:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PPP for Shanghai, Beijing 

message: I don't know if this map is appropriate or not. Paracel and Spratly Islands is still a territorial disputes with many country if put it in map it just like propaganda that Islands belong to China.Tnt1984 (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About a Chinese provinces map 

message: China doesn't produce provincial-level PPP data, and neither to international agencies. Hence, this is purely original research, and therefore inappropriate for Wikipedia.
Recommend for deletion.
DOR (HK) (talk) 02:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't use PPP this way 

message: How is inflation handled with this data?  PPP comparisons over time require some sort of inflation adjustment.  These numbers seem to have been adjusted, but the method is not listed.  If no adjustment was made, then calculated growth rates will be exaggerated.  Plutologist (talk) 19:26, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inflation 

message: Is there any reason why Taiwan has been removed from this page? I wanted to see comparative stats between the ROC and PRC provinces. The header clearly states Taiwan is under a separate government so I see no reason why the data should not be included here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.113.46.93 (talk) 03:14, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan 

message: How come the list does not include Shenzhen? Moreover, the introduction says Hong Kong and Macao are included for comparison but they are not in the tables. Either the sentence should be removed or the data included. Maybe the title could clearly state that this is about cities in mainland China.--Ghormax (talk) 01:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shenzhen 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Chinese administrative divisions by GDP per capita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/201602/t20170229_1324019.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130518150903/http://219.235.129.58/reportView.do?Url=%2FxmlFiles%2F2b4b1192413a4f0fa36b22b0be13bc90.xml&id=f4e9def81b194d6a8d0c9eb9ece96a0b&bgqDm=20100000 to http://219.235.129.58/reportView.do?Url=%2FxmlFiles%2F2b4b1192413a4f0fa36b22b0be13bc90.xml&id=f4e9def81b194d6a8d0c9eb9ece96a0b&bgqDm=20100000
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: gdps of every province added to be about 86000  not 82000.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.80.111.112 (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  stat 

message: Since "Taiwan" has been added and removed from this article, as well as related articles, it would be good if we could get consensus as to its inclusion or exclusion.  It seems to me that it is reasonable to include it as long as there are clear disclaimers that it is governed by the ROC and not the PRC.  This is in the spirit of neutrality for a disputed territory, and it also seems reasonable that anyone wanting to know this data for provinces of the PRC would likely also be interested to know the same data for Taiwan for comparison purposes.  I know that this information is certainly of interest to me.  As long as there are clear disclaimers, I don't think it seems political or confusing to include Taiwan.  What do others think? Vontheri (talk) 23:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Taiwan