Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo/Archive The Legend of Zelda 1

message: Please leave the WP:CVG banner on the talk pages. They automatically classify an article for the Wikipedia 1.0 project. If you could put  back on any pages that they have been removed from, that would be appreciated. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 07:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What if I combine the two two tags? That would be incredibly easier, since all tLoZ articles are also CVG articles. No reason not to, IMO. --NTDOY Fanboy 19:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

text: If someone could merge the two, that would be great, as I'm not too good with templates and I want to keep the variables usable if the two are merged. Scepia 20:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Update: I put the cvgproj template coding into the zeldaproj template. I kept the core of the cvgproj template while customizing it for this project. I am keeping the CVG to-do list for now, but that may change, along with other thing(s). Scepia 03:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|cvgproj}} 

message: Do we sign up or ask before working on one of the to-do's, or do we just go at? Also, where is the to-do list that is said to be in this talk page? Superneoking 22:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To-Do's

message: Erm...  May I join the project, if that is possible?  I know quite a bit about the Zelda Series, if that helps.  I had made the Poe Sisters, Jalhalla, etc. Articles.  Whether the question I asked is successful or not, good luck!  I'm all for such a Wikitendo thingymabobber!  --Dreyfus 02:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, just add your name to the list of participants. Glad to have you! Scepia 20:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am interested in joining as well.--Noah A. 07:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I will go ahead and add myself to the project - I'm very interested in helping out in any way I can, and it looks like we just add ourselves.  Thanks, and let me know if any help is needed! 
--TheTriumvir 20:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I would also like to add myself to the project, if that's okay. Hope I can be of service! --Quijo 03:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be tossing my name in as well, I know a lot about the series but will limit myself to as many minor edits as possible. I'll be sure to run Major Changes through more experienced Wikipedia users first. --LinkBoz84 00:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I will add my name to the project. I know a ton about Zelda, mostly about the enemies and characters. Pokemon Guy 13:25, 09 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signing Up? 

message: Hi everyone. I'm not a member of this WikiProject, but given that it -- along with all the other video game WikiProjects -- is technically a subsidiary of the overall Computer and Video Games WikiProject, I thought I'd bring to your attention this proposal for the deletion of spoiler tags from all computer and video game articles. An in-depth explanation of the reasoning behind this can be found on the discussion page I've linked to (and a lot of additional discussion on the matter can be found in the places linked to from there, such as the spoiler warning talk page and this archive from it, in which a motion to contest the spoiler warning's Guideline status was successfully put forth), but to briefly summarize the reasoning behind this:
::"In no way do [spoiler tags] actually contribute to the encyclopedia's purpose of being informative about subjects on a comprehensive level, and, in actuality, they're redundant of the fact that this is an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia is defined as a comprehensive source of information on a variety of subjects. This is...not a fansite or blog. Also, given that Wikipedia is not censored -- and, again, given that it is an encyclopedia -- what encyclopedic purpose are spoiler tags serving? The answer is 'not a single one.' We already have a spoiler warning accessible from the bottom of every page of this encyclopedia. Wikipedia need not constantly reiterate that it is an encyclopedia."
If all of you could drop by and weigh in on this, we'd all appreciate it. We really feel like we're working toward the betterment of video game articles on Wikipedia -- and the betterment of Wikipedia as a whole -- by pushing for the removal of this unencyclopedic content. Thanks for your time. Ryu Kaze 22:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler tags

message: Why is Puzzle game being added as genre? The puzzles are part of the adventure genre, but are most certainly not making it a puzzle game. JackSparrow Ninja 20:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puzzle game? 

message: I have a question in regards to Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series.  Wouldn't it be better to have "real" screen-shots of Dark Link in the article as opposed to ones created with the help of a cheating device?  Readers who haven't played those games may get the wrong impression that Dark Link can be playable by normal means.  -SaturnYoshi 21:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark Link 

message: Link (The Legend of Zelda series) has been put up for Featured Article Review, so if you want to help improve it to current FA standard, its there! I'll try to help out too. Judgesurreal777 00:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have arrived from WP:FF to help with the Link article.  I will be adding story references for the LttP, LA, OoT, and MM sections. I hope to get further involved as well. Sir Crazyswordsman 03:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: Link (The Legend of Zelda series) is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality.  Sandy 00:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have arrived from WP:FF to help with the Link article.  I will be adding story references for the LttP, LA, OoT, and MM sections. I hope to get further involved as well. Sir Crazyswordsman 03:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Link (The Legend of Zelda series)]]

message: A request has been made at WikiProject Computer and video games talk to integrate the  template into the CVG header itself.  The newly integrated template can be seen here: User:Hbdragon88/Temp.  Thoughts?  Objections? --PresN 15:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The zeldaproj template already does class and importance... do we need more integration?!?! Scepia 05:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See, that's the thing.  The importance and class ratings should be and are already handled by the parent cvgproj header.  It doesn't matter how important it is within LoZ; it's how important it is under the scope of the CVG project for Wikipedia 1.0.  And this is one of the templates that I'm pushing to be intergrated - with cvgproj, NESproj, and this one, the talk page can get quite cluttered. Hbdragon88 07:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integration with {{tl|cvgproj}} 

message: The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords DS into The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass. 
The whole premise of this, that there was ever a Four Swords DS game in creation, is false. 
If you look in the link in this articles references, this is what is stated in an interview with a Nintendo higher up:
GI: Will there be any connectivity with the Nintendo DS?
Aonuma: No there won’t be any connectivity with the DS. We do have another Zelda game up and running on the DS, but unfortunately, because our goal is to get this one done by the end of the year we can’t focus too much attention on that one.
GI: Is that Four Swords DS?
Aonuma: No, it’s not Four Swords. Actually, the interview that I was talking about a DS Zelda and Four Swords, I was explaining that with Four Swords we worked with two screens, and because of the experience we had with working with two screens we could easily adapt a system like that with the DS and do different things with it. But I never said that we were actually developing Four Swords for the DS.
In light of this, I believe this article belongs in the development section of Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass. Please contribute your thoughts on the Four Swords DS talk page. Judgesurreal777 22:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge away!!!  -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 01:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Is it really needed? The idea behind a template is to link all articles of the same subject to each other for quick accsess. But, every item and weapon in the series is listed on the same page, Weapons and items from The Legend of Zelda series. How much use could this temeplate really be? -- Jelly Soup 06:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone have a comment? -- Jelly Soup 21:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, it's useless. Nominate it for deletion, right? Scepia 19:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -- Jelly Soup 20:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Zelda Weapons and Items Template

message: The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (ゼルダの伝説 ムジュラの仮面, Zelda no Densetsu: Majora no Kamen?) This was translated into Romaji incorrectly.  ムジュラ is translated to "Mujura" not "Majora", "Majora" is written マジョラ, Whether the title is Majora or Mujura is what I don't know. 
I'd thought I'd point that out instead of editing the article.  This is my first time as a member, but I've been surfing wikipedia for a year or so now, so sorry in advance for doing anything wrong.  Christian TJP 00:57, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Japanese name is "Mask of Mujula".  It was changed to "Majora" when translated. So it should say "Mujula no Kamen".  -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 06:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese Translation Error

message: Sraan and myself have worked hard to improve some of the older Zelda articles. Hopefully, these changes will be helpful to your project. Grendel 20:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some changes...

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Zelda_places
Why is Termina listed on its own line in bold? It seems like a title, but all of the locations below it are in Hyrule. —Captain538[talk] 01:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Something wrong with the locationstemplate...

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council is currently in the process of developing a master directory of the existing WikiProjects to replace and update the existing Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  These WikiProjects are of vital importance in helping wikipedia achieve its goal of becoming truly encyclopedic. Please review the following pages: 
*User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory 2, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Philosophy and religion Directory, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Sports Directory, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory/United States, (note: This page will be retitled to more accurately reflect its contents)
*User:Badbilltucker/History and society directory, and
*User:Badbilltucker/Science directory
and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory.
The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. 
It is my hope to have the existing directory replaced by the updated and corrected version of the directory above by November 1. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 21:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry if you tried to update it before, and the corrections were gone. I have now put the new draft in the old directory pages, so the links should work better. My apologies for any confusion this may have caused you. B2T2 00:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Directory 

message: This article has potential to improve and be of good article status. Perhaps we should work on it? ~ZytheTalk to me! 14:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ganon 

message: I just thought I would tell you all that someone has requested that Majora be moved to Majora's Mask, for those interested. TJ Spyke 04:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Majora's Mask 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 17:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards