lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of libraries

message: This is an impossibly broad list with no definition. There is a point in list of (notable) public libraries , or list of research libraries, etc, but no purpose whatever in a combined list. The combination should be handled with categories. I propose a split. DGG 05:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: definition of list

message: What do you think about changing the appearance of the article like the German Wiki: de: Liste von Bibliotheken. To divide the libraries into countries is clearer and better. -- 78.43.121.238 (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: sure. DGG (talk) 18:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That works.  I'd prefer just a normal sortable table with: Name | Country | City | Number of Volumes | References.  This way we could sort by size, location, etc. gren グレン 03:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this one: List of national libraries
---
The format of List of newspapers is very appealing to me though--222.67.204.235 (talk) 11:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chaniging the appearance of the article

message: Is this a list of Library systems (meaning the organizations themselves) or of library buildings (meaning the actual physical structure)? I see examples of both here. Opinions? --Olegkagan (talk) 21:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Library Systems or Library Buildings? 

message: It appears Bibliotheca Alexandrina and Library of Alexandria are the same thing (both in Egypt), if I am not mistaken their external link point to the same website. —M@sssly✉ 20:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate entry for libraries in Egypt 

message: This list is way too overbroad and unmaintainable.  An alphabetical list of all libraries of all types in the entire world?  If properly expanded, it would be unusable in its current form.  I'm retiring this list as .  Assuming no objections are made, it will eventually be changed into a redirect, pointing to a list of lists.  Of course, the edit history of this old list will remain available, if needed.  In the meantime, you may look at existing lists in :Category:Lists of libraries, or better yet, go directly to :Category:WikiProject Libraries categories which is being reorganized.  Categories will always be the most current source of available articles, as lists have to be built and maintained by hand.  If you wish to join the effort to dust off and revitalize library-related articles, you are welcome to join us at Wikipedia:WikiProject Libraries.  Thanks!  LibraryGeek (talk) 08:17, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to retire this list. 

message: Since this is a list article about notable libraries, shouldn't we remove red-linked entries? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinkers in a list of "notable" libraries
Talk:The Yellow Book

message: I have removed Count Eric Stenbock from the list of authors who have appeared within the pages of the Yellow Book. While Stenbock did indeed submit some of his writing to the Book (one confirmed of these is his play La Mazurka Des Revenants, of which the rejection letter can be viewed in the Durtro pressing released in 2002), he was never published within it. A scan through the digital copies of the Book should reveal this fact to be true. Please replace him in the list if I am incorrect in this. -Maldoror
I removed this text:
:It is interesting to compare it with a Black book (also a little black book) which contains a list of potential dates etc carried usually by men and the Blue Book, which is where the comedian Max Miller got his 'dirty' material'. The Red Book is the This is Your Life book.
Didn't seem to be really pertinent to the Yellow Book.  If someone wants to make a List of books known by their colours, it ought to include such things as the Red Book of Hergest and the Llibre Vermell de Montserrat as well.  -- Smerdis of Tlön 21:34, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: Does anybody have access to the references that supports this claim? I can't cite Wikipedia as a source and don't have access to all of the references used in the article via JSTOR --5.81.52.82 (talk) 16:24, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  French books were wrapped in yellow paper 

message: This article doesn’t seem to distinguish between the publication known as The Yellow Book and ‘yellow books’ as a genre. This ought to be clarified by someone with better knowledge of the subject. 2A00:23C7:E980:500:3C4E:E6AB:B918:DAFC (talk) 18:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some confusion
Talk:Alternative medicine/Archive 1

message: The page history of this talk page documents again, that RK has edited my previous comments?  The faster I comment here the faster somebody deletes, edits, or moves thems someplace else?--Mr-Natural-Health 18:31, 6 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd do well to read this. - Hephaestos 18:33, 6 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  What kind of Talk Page is this?
Talk:Naturalist

message: Moved, because more pages link to Naturalist than Naturalism. Andy Mabbett 23:22, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Naturalist needs a disambiguation page. While I have no idea how in the blue hell a Naturalist is an atheist, I do know that the word itself has multiple definitions. In a number of books, it's defined as a hobby-Naturalists observe nature and animals and usually keep notes on every behavior they find. In this way, Darwin was a naturalist. And then I have something like the above. 24.32.205.164 (talk) 13:11, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naturalist
Talk:Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

message: ·       Please consider adding the following paragraph at the end of the Plain view and open fields section:
Moreover, several state courts have rejected the open fields doctrine under their own state constitutional search-and-seizure provisions. [Proposed cites: See, e.g., Faulkner v. State, 98 So. 691 (Miss. 1924); State v. Bullock, 901 P.2d 61 (Mont. 1995); People v. Scott, 593 N.E.2d 1328 (N.Y. 1992); State v. Dixson, 766 P.2d 1015 (Or. 1988); Welch v. State, 289 S.W. 510 (Tenn. 1926); State v. Kirchoff, 587 A.2d 988 (Vt. 1991); State v. Johnson, 879 P.2d 984 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994).] Lyrical42 (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested edit to "Plain view and open fields" section
Talk:Greater Poland

message: There are names in a given language that should never be translated into the other language as this creates an unncecessary confusion. Term "Wielkopolska" is one of them in my opinion. There is a difference between explanation to what such a name means (thus "great Poland" in quotates is fine) and actually creating an English version to the name. It just does not work that way.
Majchers, Canada
In English, I've more often seen Great Poland than Greater Poland (similarly, I tend to say Little Poland rather than Lesser Poland).  Should the page be moved? john 03:18, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Possibly with time a consensus to this effect will develop among English-users.  (There does seem to be a growing trend favoring authentic names.)  logologist|Talk 22:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Where was this territory diring Polish Partitions? mikka (t) 17:56, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Radomil talk 22:04, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Diring Partitions

message: The map is not very helpful: none of the rivers are labelled, and the captions are not in English. -- Beland (talk) 10:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and would like to see an English translation of the map captions. Eugene Craig Campbell (talk) 11:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: Wielkopolska is modern and the pictures show mostly old buildings.Xx236 (talk) 12:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: Another Polish propaganda page, the majority of which cannot be found in any history books outside Poland. The Kashubians, for instance, never ever regarded themselves as "Polish" and preceded the Poles in the region. It is therefore an insult to describe them as just speaking a Polish dialect - as though they were some kind of sub group. Even the German archives give them as a separate entity. Ethnically, until the 19th century deliberate migrations, West Prussia was not Polish. This can be found in countless books including the historical summaries lodged by non-Poles at the Versailles conferences in 1919. Wikipedia continues to permit itself to be a vehicle for the most blatant Polish nationalist propaganda. 'History' as they would like it to be seen. 2A00:23C4:B617:7D01:94D:4C84:81F3:FE7A (talk) 09:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Fantasy

message: I suggest starting this article by copying the content we have here, which then could be shortened here. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support per reasonable nom Marcelus (talk) 08:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose The section is not so long. There are several articles on historical regions with similarly long or even longer history sections. Marcin 303 (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[History of Greater Poland]]
Talk:Portchester

message: The tone needs work. Some of the wording is of the promotional, tourist brochure style. Also we need citations on more of the content. Finally, the structure needs work. The lead is too long and the history needs to be split out from that into its own section and expanded. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone and Structure 

message: According to the present article, nothing has happened in Portchester for the past 1500 years.
This article sadly needs an update from a local historian, not an archeologist.--Oldontarian (talk) 18:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: Spelling and grammar is terrible which I have been trying to edit. Also, the twinning section is completely false. Portchester is part of the Borough of Fareham, which is twinned with Vannes in France and Pulheim in Germany. Portchester itself is not twinned with any other place. Also the census figures do not include both Portchester wards, so the population figures in the table are grossly under-reported. Oursoulsarecheap2day (talk) 23:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Thanks for coming here, Could I ask how do you know the twinning section is false ?, The other question is do you have a source for the population figures ?, Those are my only 2 issues, Thanks, –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 23:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling and Grammar, False information 

message: https://legacy-reports.cotswoldarchaeology.co.uk/content/uploads/2019/02/770793-Land-at-Cranleigh-Road-Porchester-Hants-Northern-Half-Evaluation-Report.pdf
©Geni (talk) 23:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Archaeological report

message: The article claims that Porchester "is 4 miles (6.4 km) northwest of Portsmouth and a similar distance from Southampton on the A27 road" but an online mapping app says that the latter is about 4 times further away by road.
124.170.235.165 (talk) 124.170.235.165 (talk) 07:11, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading distance information
Talk:Opole

message: I don't think ɔ:pɔlε is correct because Polish doesn't have long vowels. Additionally, it might be useful to mark the stres, so I suggest: ɔˈpɔlε.
Regarding above, I live there and both "O"s are as in hot  & pot,and the "e" as in end or pen.
Yes, I agree with you. ( I'm from Poland ) O like in hot, P - pen, L - like, E - end. 77.113.97.231 (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I believe it's called Holy Mary's (Polish: Najswietszej Marii Panny) Church. Shouldn't it be corrected?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.222.88.124 (talk) 13:59, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Adalbert's Church? 

message: Someone added a category that Opole is a site of 21st-century attack on synagogues and Jewish communal organizations.
First of all this old Jewish cemetary is not owned by any Jewish communal organizations, but is a property of Opole communal services. Second of all the information about its recent desacration  has been demented on the portal Jewish.org.pl but that was not checked by the brave fighter with supposed anti-semitic acts.
Categories in articles about cities are concerning their administrative location. Adding there something like this looks simply grotesque.
Finally desacrations of Jewish (and other minority) cemetaries happen in many cities in the world. On the same CFCA page there is an information that a cemetary was devastated in Hartford, Connecticut, but there is no "21st-century attacks on synagogues and Jewish communal organizations" category there. Why?
Opole.pl (talk) 10:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  strange category 

message: (Note: The deportation of Viennese Jews to Opole most likely is a reference to a historical event that happened in "the other Opole," a town by the same time in Lublin, in eastern Poland. Therefore, the facts in this paragraph may not be factual as they apply to the Opole this article refers to).
This was in the "After WWI" section of the article.  While this statement may be correct, it does not belong in the article.  Perhaps an editor with access to resources regarding the deportation of Jews from Vienna could research this further.  (The "other Opole" referred to is Opole Lubelskie). W. B. Wilson (talk) 08:48, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: the text mentioned above is still today, more than four years after (or again) in this article! It is confusing! 80.151.9.187 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:15, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  text removed from main article
Talk:Chrismation

message: The article states:
"At the reconciliation of apostates
In the Eastern Orthodox Church the sacrament may be conferred more than once and it is customary to receive apostates by repeating chrismation.[8][9] Saint Methodius of Constantinople[10] [11]
[edit]At the reception of certain converts"
No idea what that is supposed to say. Unless "Saint Methodius of Constantinople" is a link to see?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.172.183.3 (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This was my error and I have fixed it.  It seems that I saved the edting session before completing hat section. Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 10:46, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete sentence. 

message: The very first baptisms, by John the Baptist upon, inter alia, Jesus, were non-Trinitarian, being performed by a monotheist Jew upon other Jews. Indeed, figuring as one of the Persons of the Trinity, how could Jesus have been baptised in the name of himself?
Nuttyskin (talk) 20:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''an invalid, non-Trinitarian baptism''
Talk:Water polo

message: Under the Rules section, please add LEN as the governing body in Europe. Please change
Governing bodies of water polo include FINA, the international governing organization for the rules; the NCAA rules, which govern the rules for collegiate matches in the United States; the NFHS rules which govern the rules in high schools in the US and the IOC rules which govern the rules at Olympic events.
to
Governing bodies of water polo include FINA, the international governing organization for the rules; LEN, which governs the rules for international European matches; the NCAA rules, which govern the rules for collegiate matches in the United States; the NFHS rules which govern the rules in high schools in the US and the IOC rules which govern the rules at Olympic events. Frankie-bhref (talk) 09:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding LEN as governing body 

message: The rules have been changed, and the goalkeeper is now permitted to move past the half-distance line. Please change the article to reflect that. 
https://collegiatewaterpolo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2020-2022PRXWP_MajorRulesChanges.pdf
https://resources.fina.org/fina/document/2021/01/12/a13c160d-b94a-4b63-93aa-a06fa370433f/2019_2021_wp_rules_congress_amended_06012020_0.pdf 136.244.131.34 (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goalkeeper half-court rules 

message: https://la84.org/wp-content/uploads/LA84WaterPolo_Fr.pdf Pete.snyd (talk) 22:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent translation of water polo book in French 

message: I want to Remove mouthgar: A mouthguard is not mandatory in most tournaments but is recommended." Because, as a waterpolo player I have never seen or heard of mouthguards being recommended because you would not be able to breath easily and you could not tell your team that your opponent is flanking trying to steal the ball etc. Br meast (talk) 16:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: While I have not removed this from the article, it does not have a source. So I have instead tagged it with the citation-needed template. In the meantime, if you are able to provide reliable sources directly explaining that water polo players do not wear mouth guards, this would support removing it from the equipment list. If you provide a source, please reactivate this edit request by following the instructions provided in the box on the right. -- Pinchme123 (talk) 01:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2023
Talk:Bilabial consonant

message: Is it just me, or does the table look nasty in the new Monobook skin?  It's fine in Standard, but in monobook the table's row sizes don't expand to accomodate the larger IPA letters, so they get smushed together in an unpleasant way.  If this happens for others, I'll raise a bug on the monobook skin. -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 00:23, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Monobook nasties
Talk:Lists of accidents and incidents on commercial airliners

message: Is this organisation helpful? I'm not sure. For one thing, official accident reports do not mention the name of the carrier or the flight number it was operating under, they usually only report the registration number of the aircraft. However, what is important is that a particular incident or accident is quickly located by someone wishing to find the details - usually the carrier and flight number are not the most obvious starting points for such a search. Chronology and location would probably be a lot more useful in terms of finding an incident, and the article itself could mention the carrier and flight number. For example most people might remember that a plane went down in the Potomac river in the early 80s, but that's all they recall - this list will not help them find that incident.  Graham 07:06, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Soyuz 4

message: I cannot recall the book where I read this, but I read somewhere that, once Soyuz 4 and 5 docked, one of the cosmonauts cried out, "Help! I'm being raped!" - the quote being removed from public records, at least until glasnost. Any credence?--74.72.199.61 (talk) 12:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember reading that, but he didn't say "Help" and word it that way; I simply remember "You raped me" said in a joking way. Still no good without a reliable source, and falls into the category of things which may be juicy and titillating, but I feel are not really encyclopedic. JustinTime55 (talk) 17:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Mission quote?
Talk:Earle Page

message: Something i've always wondered is why one of Page's middle names is Christmas - anyone know the answer?
PMA 08:34, Dec 10, 2003 (UTC)
I think it was a family name. I had a friend at school whose mother was called Mary Christmas. 
 Adam 06:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We say he had 41 years, 361 days in parliament.  He was elected at the 1919 election, held on 13 December 1919.  He died on 20 December 1961.  That makes 42 years, 8 days by my count.   Parliamentary service is counted from the date of the election/by-election, not from the date of declaration of the poll or whatever else.  I've changed the text.  --  JackofOz (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, my mistake.  I forgot to take into account that he was defeated at the 1961 election, 11 days before he died. Fixed.  --  JackofOz (talk) 12:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Length of service

message: There is an ongoing discussion here about finding a consistent term to describe Earle Page, Frank Forde and John McEwen's premierships in their articles and beyond (acting, caretaker, interim etc). It has also touched upon how to number Australian Prime Ministers. It would be very much appreciated if any interested editors could join in and voice their thoughts on the matter! Thanks! FollowTheTortoise (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology and numbering
Talk:Boussinesq approximation (buoyancy)

message: Hello everybody.
(newbie here).  Anyone got examples of obviously non-Boussinesq flows that
do not have the complication of surface energy?
Hello - I've just tidied up that section a little bit. The helical motion of rising air bubbles in water (due to pressure differences caused by helical boundary layer detachment) does not occur to the same extent for falling water droplets because the water droplets are significantly denser than the air. This isn't ideal though - because the inertial mass of the air bubble is significantly larger than it's actual mass due to the added mass of water than needs to be accelerated in order to accelerate the air bubble. I wasn't sure what the context of the last sentence was ("Boussinesq-approximation advantage: We need not to have temperature field to get dynamics.") so I removed it for reasons of clarity. Can anyone explain? Chrisjohnson 12:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

message: (another newbie) The Inversions section is irrelevant to the Boussinesq approximation.
Use of reduced gravity is a special case of the Boussinesq approximation, which should be separated from the definition and referenced from the Boussinesq page. A continuously stratified fluid can be just as well approximated by the Boussinesq approximation. So Boussinesq physics should not be confused with reduced-gravity flows.
The example of beer bubbles and raindrops is misleading. Scaled with the right bubble/drop radii and velocities, these flows look much the same. Large raindrops form into hemispheric shapes and break up, like bubbles. The important quantity is the dynamic viscosity, of which density is only one factor. But arguing this is distracting, because it has little to do with the Boussinesq approximation. Far from being a helpful exposition on Boussinesq flows, this section should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deszoeke (talk • contribs) 21:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inversions section misleading and irrelevant to understanding Boussinesq flows
Talk:Valentin Tomberg

message: Good Lord! This is so irresponsible - so inaccurate.
Examples - Tomberg did not go Majorca in 1960. He resided in England till 1973, dying in Majorca on a holiday. He was never secretary General of the Anthroposophical Society, but did briefly lead the local Estonian Anthroposophical Society. 
I don't believe his father made it out of Russia (?) and the text contains numerous other dubious statements.
If the rest of this encyclopedia is this inaccurate, you will misleading thousands of people. You have a responsibility.
:Anyone here may edit a page.  If you have better information, by all means feel free to make any corrections you think ought to be made. -- Smerdis of Tlön 15:01, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text:  I did that, because it is right that Tomberg lived in Reading not in Majorca, whre he died on a holiday. Frommbold 21:33, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled