Talk:Japanese curry

message: Seems to me that the way you make curry isn't from a "mix". —This unsigned comment was added by 71.106.169.235 (talk • contribs) .
:Your point being?  This is how the Japanese tend to make it.  Shermozle 10:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true. Everyone makes it from a mix, even people in India and Pakistan. Granted, many of them make their own mix of spices, but it's still a mix. --日本穣 11:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

text: The curry mix is from House, a very well-known Japanese food products brand. The crumbs are definitely Korean, though. ˑˑˑ日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoε 23:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Curry making

message: "It is often criticized as a corruption of a "true" curry by Japan's Asian population due to its sweetness and lack of resemblance to other forms of the dish more directly related to its Indian counterparts."
This comment seems out of place. I think more people in Japan (and around the world) praise their interpretation of the Southeast Asian dish and enthusiastically fill their bellies with it on a daily basis. I am going to delete this sentence.
Yeah, and I would add that talking about "Japan's Asian population" is akin to saying "the US's North-American population." Utterly meaningless. Thank you, brits, for labeling Indians and other sub-Continental peoples "Asian", as if the rest of the freaking continent didn't exist. 38.117.131.2 19:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: I couldn't find a definitive recipe for curry roux (making it from scratch, not from packets).   is the closest I get to a recipe, starting from Indian curry powder.  (bottom of page) has some general stuff about the spices in the roux. Richard W.M. Jones 08:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's actually in curry roux? 

message: "Japanese curry rice is served in a large soup bowl, with white rice mostly on the left side and the curry mostly on the right side" - What is the train of thought here? Surely if, heaven forbid, someone created a dish with the reversed layout (rice on the right and curry on the left), you could crazily rotate the plate 180 degrees... --An 10:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curry Layout 

message: The two words (カレー karē and カリー karī) have different meanings in Japan. The Japanese variant of the Southeast Asian dish, which is being discussed here, is without exception referred to as  karē, but karī may sometimes be used when talking about a non-Japanese dish. The two are not freely interchangable. I'm removing karī from the opening. TomorrowTime (talk) 08:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  カレー vs. カリー 

message: Since all my propositions/requests, whatever their form, to add information/link about the nature of japanese curry are systematically reverted to the benefit of ready made curry, and since the other editor make no effort whatsoever to propose alternatives, I suppose there is a hidden interrest to deprive the reader of this information.85.27.42.125 (talk) 19:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to me (as I stated above) that you have some driving need to have that blog listed here on this page. You should know that Wikipedia uses nofollow tags and that being listed here is not going to increase ranking on Google for what is increasingly appearing to be your site. Trying to turn this around to state we (Wikipedia) are trying to "deprive" readers of this information is disingenuous and fallacious. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

text: There is nothing tendancious in asking for a public information to be disclosed. I was also thinking about going to arbitrage, but things need to be taken care of in the correct procedure order85.27.42.125 (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is tendentious if there is no reason for it. Unless you can show there is some actual conflict of interest here, continuing to add that tag will be viewed as disruptive. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interrest 

message: I've reverted this addition of a COI tag on the grounds that it's wholly invalid. None of us are even remotely affiliated with any organization that deals with Japanese curry. It's not like any of us work for Vermont Curry or something. Honestly this issue is getting completely out of hand; we've really just got one very tendentious editor, and we might want to look at taking this to ANI. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 19:22, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing tendancious in asking for a public information to be disclosed. I was also thinking about going to arbitrage, but things need to be taken care of in the correct procedure order85.27.42.125 (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is tendentious if there is no reason for it. Unless you can show there is some actual conflict of interest here, continuing to add that tag will be viewed as disruptive. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag? 

message: I've inserted links in some of the non-english ingredients cited, as well as in both places from the section Other varieties.
There's actually an explanation of hayashi sauce in parentheses, so the linking was more a suggestion for a future addition.
Hokkaidō was already linked twice, but both entries appeared after this section. I'm not completely familiar with Wikipedia standards, but guess the first entry takes precedence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denismattos (talk • contribs) 02:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, no problem. Not sure what to do with those other links.. maybe a translation of the Japanese articles if I get some time. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absent Links 

message: Thanks, HelloAnnyong, for the almost immediate redirecting of hondashi. That's the article I was originally looking for.
Also, I'm sorry for forgeting to sign my comment above. Denis Mattos 03:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, no problem. Not sure what to do with those other links.. maybe a translation of the Japanese articles if I get some time. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 

message: This article doesn't belong in the Korean cuisine category. Merely being popular in a region doesn't mean it's part of that cuisine. Bibimbap is popular in urban US cities - should we label it as being part of American cuisine? Pad thai is available basically everywhere in the US, but should it be labeled as American cuisine? The same sort of logic applies. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 01:02, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It's like calling McDonald's "Japanese food" just because it's popular there. (Actually, I don't even want to call it "American food"...) Boneyard90 (talk) 03:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean cuisine category 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Japanese curry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722101857/http://kutsunazemi.daa.jp/newsite/activity/paper%26report/consultingreport/2010/fujikawa_doc.pdf to http://kutsunazemi.daa.jp/newsite/activity/paper%26report/consultingreport/2010/fujikawa_doc.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: *Wired, 2009. --RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 23:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential new source 

message: Is it just me, or does that look like a picture of Thai curry? It looks like a picture taken in Bangkok of some kind of Thai curry served over rice (ราดข้าว), or maybe of Thai curry at a Thai restaurant in Japan. Japanese kare is much darker and thicker, and does not have little bits of pounded red chili like you see in this picture. In fact, I think I see either fish balls or maybe prawn parts, as you would find in Thailand. I think of kare as usually having potatoes and carrots. 
Thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.160.26.43 (talk) 05:59, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, that does not look like a typical dish of curry & rice in Japan. - Boneyard90 (talk) 07:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

text: The dish at the top of the Japanese page looks like a typical Japanese curry dish. If there are no objections, I suggest that the image from the Japanese page be substituted for the one currently in use. - Boneyard90 (talk) 07:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Curry Picture