lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lens flare

message: Lens flare is always an error in the lens system. That is, it is a situation where the lens does not accurately reproduce (at its output) the input signal.
Sometimes the error is used for artistic effects.
Atlant 11:18, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: True enough! And this should be explained in the article. But starting with "Lens flare is an error that may occur..." could give the impression that its appearance is always a mistake, which is not the case. --Rick Sidwell 22:14, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: I created a chapter about a distinct type of artefact on digital pictures. I never saw this type of artefact/flare described elsewhere. I can prove that the rainbows on the picture are not lens flare, but I don't know where else to describe this. Does it deserve a separate page? Emmanuelm 02:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Diffraction artifact

message: Is the effect shown in, for example, this image also called a lens flare? I mean the lamps showing up as stars with six arms? --ZeroOne (talk | @) 22:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that isn't lens flare -- it's diffraction caused by the aperture blades of the lens used to take the picture. -- Moondigger 20:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lamps as stars? 

message: I've significantly changed the layout of the images in this article, since I found it extremely distracting. I've also removed one of the 6(!) images, since I felt it did not add any significant value in addition to the other five. I still think 5 images is a lot for a start-class article, although it's better than six.
Anyway, feel free to revert if you find that I was wrong in doing so. Sir Link 08:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding images 

message: Is it possible to alter the layout of the last set of images on this page?
It's fairly chaotic and untidy having them all down the right hand side, particularly as it artificially stretches the "external links" heading. I've noticed many other articles have images in the main body of the text, so it's not without precedent.
I'm certainly not suggesting a return to the earlier design tidied up by Sir Link, but perhaps a subheading at the end called "Examples of Lens Flare" with images which don't directly relate to any particular subheading put together in series. 
I put this as a suggestion here because my Wiki editing skills aren't sufficient to make the change myself, (i.e. I don't want to make a mess of the article) so I'd rather let someone more expert have a go, if they consider it appropriate.
D  Damage (talk) 02:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images Layout
Talk:Amalfi Coast

message: This could really use images... any tourists or natives have pictures? gren 11:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, i have the best pictures ever... I'll contribute them later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanmcdonald (talk • contribs) 16:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: I'm a little confused over the lead paragraph.  It reads "The Amalfi coast was later controlled by the Principality of Salerno, until Amalfi was sacked by the Republic of Pisa in 1137. Since then the Amalfi coast has experienced a crisis."  The way this reads is that since the 12 century, the Amalfi Coast has had a crisis.  Has Amalfi really had a crisis for the last 800 years?  What is this crisis? 69.116.158.191 (talk) 02:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crisis 

message: On both Safari and Firefox on my MacOS computer, the Map of Amalfi Coast and View toward Positano from Salerno boxes overlap the Municipalities table, particularly in Safari. I like these elements, but they need to be repositioned so they don't get in the way of others on the page. Thank you for considering my request. Bart (talk) 20:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping Elements need a fix
Talk:Kaiser Chiefs

message: in geocities top 100-albums of the year 2005 ive seen that "employment"just sold 1.8 mio copies, but here isaw a number about 2.8 mio-a bit too much i think. i wrote 1.8 mio instead of 2.8 mo copies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.2.140.13 (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Employment Selling Figures

message: The line where it mentions the new album should say what year the album is scheduled to drop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by U-Mos (talk • contribs) 20:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Album

message: Just wondering why you removed this:
The Kaiser Chiefs have recieved minor exposure in Australia. The Australian Rules football program The Fifth Quarter, which reviews AFL games played each Saturday, on Network Ten, has the Kaiser Chiefs song Na Na Na Na Naa as their theme song.
I had no idea about the band until I heard the song (on the program) and googled them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40010 (talk • contribs) 11:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  5th Quater
Talk:Pedare Christian College

message: Removed unsourced Alumni as per Admin Kusma's (talk) (unilateral) policy regarding other South Australian Schools. Please address all concerns on his talk page.
:There is no such policy. Please do not address this on my talk page, but discuss this article here. Thank you, Kusma (talk) 18:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni 
Talk:Loss

message: I did a fair bit of cleanup on the page.  Most importantly, the dictionary defintions were removed (and in their place, wiktionary was linked to), as dicdefs belong on wiktionary, not on wikipedia.  In other cases (insurance/finance), I wasn't able to find a single page that was related closely enough to loss to link to.  --Interiot 18:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: The wins stat in baseball does not decrease when a pitcher is credited with a loss. The record gets worse, which is a hybrid stat of wins and losses (i.e. a record of 4-1 means 4 wins, 1 loss). BigNate37 23:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wins definition inaccurate
Talk:Liberalism and radicalism in Italy

message: 1- The first, historical Radical Party was born in 1877 and not in 1878.
2- There were some other "liberal" parties before Fascist dictatorship and not only the Liberal Party (for example the Democratic Party leaded by Amendola sr. and some other minor parties) but I don't know when exactly they were founded.
3- The Action Party had two wings: the progressive liberal one, and the liberal socialist one; when the party suffered a crisis, the members of this last socialist wing, joined the Socialist Party, so I don't think that this party should be called "liberal".
4- machiavelli wasn't liberal, come on... and Italy had a lot of other thinkers that could be considered liberal like Mazzini, Pareto, Mosca, Einaudi that are internationally well known. --clemi 18:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pareto a liberal? Intangible 18:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On Pareto I don't know, for the rest I totally agree with Clemi. There's a lot of work on... --Checco 22:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something to be changed 

message: He was prime minister during the first decades of the 20th Century (the so-called "età giolittiana", Giolitti's era), so I think that it's wrong to consider him only a liberal of the 19th Century. --Checco 22:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Giolitti

message: @User:Autospark: As you have seen, I've been doing several fixes to this article. A question arose to me: would it be better having a joint timeline instead of the current one, basically divided in "political families"? Second issue: "Liberal leaders" is quite a loose and, to some extent, controversial definition, but I overhauled the section, I removed the tag I added before and it can stay for now: any thoughts? Many thanks, --Checco (talk) 08:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Checco, I have no problem with the leadership section as it stands. I'm moving towards thinking that a joint timeline is the best solution, particularly as the strands of the different parties have merged with other and overlapped at times.--Autospark (talk) 13:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I'm going to think throughly on that, before doing it, but your opinion is very important to me. --Checco (talk) 13:45, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline and liberal leaders
Talk:Black Hebrews

message: Can you include when it started?
Hayson 20:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  When is it started? 

message: Having looked through all the material, this page was simply about African Hebrew Israelite Nation of Jerusalem, who are not anti-semitic (i.e. serve in IDF although there are other Black Hebrew groups which are. This is a temporary measure because this page should be merged with Black Hebrew Israelites, some of whom are anti-semitic and some of whom are not. This needs sorting out.Harrypotter 21:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved Page 

message: This page is specifically (and only) about the Black Hebrews who live in Dimona. They are a different group from the ones listed on the page you merged into. The group in Dimona did not begin serving in the IDF until 2004. Ckessler 07:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am sorry but if you took the trouble to check Black Hebrew Israelites you will see there is a link to African Hebrew Israelite Nation of Jerusalem, which is the correct name for the specific group. The page redirected too then lists specific groups falling in the general category.Harrypotter 21:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert
Talk:Patrick John Ryan

message: "In 1847 he went to the United States to study at St. Patrick's College in Carlow. ... Near the end of his life, he was assigned yet again to the University of Colorado, where he and another deacon, Adolphus Coorz, developed a theory of libel and slander that later became the basis for New York Times v. Sullivan."
Carlow is in Ireland, not the US and the final sentence is patently wrong. "Near the end of his life" he was no longer a deacon, but the Archbishop of Philadelphia, and I am unaware of anything to support that he was involved with the U of Colorado or, in any way, contributed to a theory of libel and slander.  I've rewritten the paragraph pretty much -correcting the text that was the first sentence, cleaning up the presentation overall, and deleting the last sentence. It needs a lot more, but I don't have time to tackle it right now. Irish Melkite (talk) 13:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Archbishop Ryan and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Archbishop Ryan until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Clovermoss (talk) 01:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Archbishop Ryan" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of World War II military units of Germany

message: re the merge suggestion, I think due to the size of this page we should just make it a "dispatch" page, i.e. have the "army groups" section point to a list of army groups, "armies" point to a list of armies, etc., down to however low we eventually go. — B.Bryant 17:20, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Drip coffee

message: Anyone?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.185.136 (talk) 01:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do Japanese cold water coffee drippers work? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Hario V60 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 22#Hario V60 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hario V60" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The Methods Section appears to be more of a list of brands, instead of a list of Methods. This leads to the section being rife with promotional material or the potential for promotional material. VVikingTalkEdits 13:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Methods section
Talk:HMS Ivanhoe (D16)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-29I-Ivanhoe.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I noticed this article is up for a GAN, but i noticed a signifigant gap in her service history. She was part of Whitworth's squadron during the Action off Lofoten. Likely the most important battle she took part in. She along with the other destroyers in the squadron attempted to engage the German battleships present with their main batteries, but were out of range. None the less the destroyer's presence prevented a german tactical victory, because the German commander mistook the gunfire from the destroyers for that of a second non-existant allied capital ship and theirfore withdrew.XavierGreen (talk) 01:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, I've added your comment to the review. Sorry, I nearly missed it. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing info
Talk:David Hager

message: I added biographical info. Will add NPOV statement about about FDA appointmnet and ex-wife after a little bit more research.--FloNight 10:03, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Added biographical info

message: Removed from rapist category. This category is not correct for Hager. He has not been convicted of rape. And there is not undisputed academic evidence he committed rape.--FloNight 12:46, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: With several high-profile people complaining about Wikipedia publically, this is a serious issue. I will protect the page without discussion if this category is reinserted. JFW | T@lk 09:02, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't abuse your authority.  Also, the lines "Many educated Republicans were astonished that a Bush appointee who is also a gynecologist would be confused with the anatomy of a woman. They also weren't quite sure what was more repulsive: the personal indiscretions of this man or just the fact that a sitting president of the United States would have the kind of judgement that would lead to such an appointment." should be removed as they are certainly not NPOV and are unsourced. - 24.23.37.62 (talk) 15:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from rapist category

message: I removed the contact information as it is not encyclopedic. We are not a directory and do not provide this type of detail in a general encyclopedia for various reasons. Also modified the content about his postion on the board at Asbury College. The rest needs reliable sources and to be written in an more encyclopedic way in order to be included. FloNight 16:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content removed...
Talk:Vila Nova de Gaia

message: The name Cale or Gaia most likely comes from the celtic root "gael", with which celts referred to themselves. It is well known that celtic tribes inhabited the area before the romans conquered it. 
There is no evidence that the goddess Gaia was ever called Cale, which
was the most usual form for the name of the city. No archeological evidence of a cult of Gaia in the area has been produced. The fact that today the city is called Gaia, which is also the ancient greek name of the goddess (her actual latin name was Terra) is a fortuitous curruption of latin Cale or Gale.
Salvadorjo 17:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sortes Astrampsychi

message: Would  do the trick? Joe D (t) 18:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Grand Central Terminal

message: - «Restored revision 1171637845 by Certes talk): Common term, see MOS:OVERLINK»
: Well the Lost and found may be a commonly seen thing in the US, but for foreigners it's not as familiar ...  It might be common for international airports but not just stations. I don't see how that link pollute article either. I suggest we put it back.
AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 17:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a self-explanatory term that is easily searchable for those who are unfamiliar. And it's not too relevant to the topic: trains, stations, New York City, etc. The concept of a wine bar could also be unfamiliar to some foreigners, yet we again don't link things that are dictionary definitions that are not really relevant to the topic. ɱ (talk) 17:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common term 

message: As of Special:Diff/1198471696 the article no longer fits into technical limitations on templates, as can be seen by missing transclusion of Template:Navboxes at the bottom.
The prose size is 11626 words, which per WP:SIZERULE:
Section § History should probably be trimmed down to a summary of corresponding article History of Grand Central Terminal. —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a sensible suggestion. I'll make a few bold excisions. PRRfan (talk) 03:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: While I mostly agree with these removals, there are two things I think should still be mentioned: the completion of electrification (in 1907), which was the impetus for constructing this station in the first place, and the closure of the old station. These two details use existing references, so no additional templates should be required.I commented out the  template shell as it was adding over 100,000 additional bytes to the post-expand include size for some reason. The PEIS is now 1,919,488/2,097,152 bytes - still not a lot of room, but it should be enough until we can summarize the history section further. I will note that, while SIZERULE does say that pages over 9,000 words "probably should be divided or trimmed", it also says "the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading material". The latter does seem to be the case here, as the GCT, like other famous NYC buildings, has received a lot of coverage in reliable sources. – Epicgenius (talk) 06:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template limit and prose size
Talk:Philadelphus

message: Wild mock-orange was removed from a common name of P. lewisii, because "wild" is meaningless.  Common names are not required to be meaningful.  "Wild mock-orange" really is a common name.  Look at , or  .  Lewis's mock-orange is just a translation of the binomial, it really isn't a commonly used common name.  I assume that "wild mock-orange" is used for P. lewisii because it is the most common garden Philadelphus.  I would like to put "wild mock-orange" back.Nereocystis 18:21, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wild mock-orange
Talk:William H. Cade

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved.  – robertsky (talk) 16:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: William H. Cade →  – Elsa's page was recently deleted and merged into this one. Considering the AfD rationale, wouldn't it be more appropriate for them to have a joint page? — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 07:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

text: So the solution is to misspell our name? 2603:8081:5200:A100:415C:B4DA:7412:391B (talk) 02:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  @Vortex3427 -- I think it's time we stopped entertaining these childish and peevish demands. The Cades are free to desist from patronizing (or even consulting or using) Wikipedia if they choose. Nirva20 (talk) 22:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 March 2024
Talk:Disneymania

message: Who put up all od those fake names! I  mean come on!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.118.252.66 (talk) 05:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism!
Talk:Crust formation

message: Needs alot of work before it is done.
:I agree. And it seems likely not a real article title as "formation" potentially limits the material that might appear here. I suggest (and will do) a move to crust. "Formation" is really just part of the story of a crust (and there is already a Crust (geology), so this is probably a disambiguation page candidate. - Marshman 04:35, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:International Detroit News Ice Yacht Racing Association

message: This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified. 
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubified. 
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 14:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-stubbed
Talk:Jill Vedder

message: Why was Jill's birth date changed from August 1977 to November 11, 1977?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.123.7 (talk) 02:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: She's been using Jill Vedder as her legal name for some years, so I'm changing the title of the article.
Her social media:
* https://www.instagram.com/j__vedder/
* https://twitter.com/jillvedder77
Articles:
* http://abcnewsradioonline.com/music-news/2018/9/24/jill-vedder-unites-with-michelle-obama-for-voter-encourageme.html
* https://www.today.com/health/help-butterfly-children-sight-thanks-rockers-who-care-t64706
* https://theslanted.com/2019/04/32935/we-day-2019-celebration-performences-celebrities/
* https://www.yourobserver.com/article/three-sisters-start-brain-cancer-charity
* https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/seattle-based-company-glassybaby-reaches-goal-of-2-million-in-giving-to-charities-dedicated-to-healing-255493111.html
* https://pearljam.com/news/help-eddie-jill-vedder-heal-eb-1488324937
* https://kfgo.com/news/articles/2018/sep/24/jill-vedder-unites-with-michelle-obama-for-voter-encouragement-campaign/
* https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/neil-patrick-harris-mahershala-ali-chance-the-rapper-selena-gomez-natalie-portman-hailee-steinfeld-meghan-trainor-and-wes-craig-kielburger-celebrate-young-people-doing-good-at-we-day-california-300838784.html
* https://www.ebresearch.org/board-of-directors.html
* https://pearljam.com/news/eb-research-partnership-has-one-million-reasons-to-be-thankful
* https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/polarityte-to-sponsor-epidermolysis-bullosa-research-partnership-event-action-for-jackson-in-new-york-300745361.html
* http://www.startribune.com/item-world-eddie-vedder-visits-u-of-m-children-s-hospital-morris-day-at-mall-of-america-more/280214302/ 
Zoolver (talk) 18:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change