Talk:G-13

message: this is a article based on rumor, and false rumors at that, the fact of the matter is the governments involvement with g-13 is highly circumstantial. Indeed g-13 is a code, for marijuana, however not a certain strain. G-13 is a code used to differintiate those marijuanas that have been cultivated and cultured to the point of medical usefullness. G-13 is still used to day by the government as a classification system, if a certain strain of marijuana is considered applicable it will be classified "g-13".
furthermore it is pop culture which has degraded the image of "g-13" to being some sort of super crush. In fact, the first strain considered "g-13" was a high kush region indica sensemillia, which was one of the first to be cross germinated with another high potency plant.
Anything with a net content of 25 percent thc P.P.M. can be classified as g-13.
there is a genuine strain named g-13 distributed by a number of Dutch and Nether distribution companies, however the use of the name is a ploy, but on the contrary names usuallly carrying g-13 are of the "g-13" class.
on another note, within small distributors g-13 is somewhat of a joke, like if you got a bag of some mystery stuff of some plant, and u got some rookie wanting an eight from montana, tell him its g-13 and charge him 2,000$ for an 1/8th.
one last bit of info, the cannabis cup ruled pure og kush to be the most highly dominant strain known to man, as it holds an impressive 41% net P.P.m. of THC....thats stoney.
i would like to see this article corected.
:theres 2 r's in corrected you junkie
:where did you get your info from? references?
:Do you have any references that can concretely substantiate those claims above? Also, Percent and PPM in this case, are two separate ways to quantify the concentration of something. It makes no logical sense to to use them together in that manner, unless P.P.M. means something else, then please fill me in...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.206.252.245 (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: does anyone know what they are talking about

message: could some wiki-savy person either fix it or delete it please?
:Agreed, I think the last 3 paragraphs of the main section, also the Etymology and Popular Culture sections should be shortened and rewritten or deleted. (Jay)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.206.252.245 (talk) 16:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the article just survived a deletion review, so that probably won't happen. The subject deserves (and given stoney culture will probably continue to get) an article; it just needs to be rewritten to document the urban legend, document the growers exploiting the urban legend, and have the BS frat prank aspects ("Michael Hallman"?) removed. -LlywelynII (talk) 13:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: this article is horrible

message: Have anyone tried this? It sounds awesome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.198.76.19 (talk • contribs) 
:I had heard of G-13 marijuana smuggled from a secret US Governemt growing facility in Mississippi as early as 1977 in High Times magazine, if this ads any credibiliy to the story. And most likely anything being pushed by the seed banks as "G-13" in origin would at least live up to the terms of definition in potency and character of high. A friend recently acquired a cutting from a grower who claimed it was the real deal G-13, who also sold him a 1/2 'O' from his last crop. And as a seasoned smoker who's tasted some of the finest soaring highs on the planet myself, I can say it certainly lived up to the definitions I've read about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.8.237 (talk • contribs) 
::It doesn't, although if you could find the actual article and cite it, that would at least substantiate the urban legend aspect of the article. -LlywelynII (talk) 13:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Experiences?

message: weed similar in potency to g-13 does not go for $500 an 1/8 on the street..the stupidity of people sometimes...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.48.19.203 (talk) 13:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ive heard about this? aparently a female IA agent, took a cutting of the species, that the american goverment had been growing o see what kind of drug they were fighting agianst. This utting was taken to the owner of the sensi seed company, who just so happend to be was of mr Howrad Marks companinions inthe drug in the early 70's. where Howard lest the life to become the famse dope smuggler, his friend bacame the owner of the rihcest seed company in the world, g-13 was later re-named by the only known owner of the stand as Howard marks seeds. The g-13 has cultivars of itself, as the g-13 haze beimg one of the top smokes at the cannabis cup  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.188.68.85 (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: lolz

message: The only US government produced cannabis is from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). It contracted with U Mississippi @ Oxford to grow cannabis for medical evaluation. That cannabis is "notoriously low in THC," ranging from 2% - 5%. The conclusion of the article is that G13 has its origins in Hollywood, rather than in a secret high-grade cannabis lab or farm.http://www.erowid.org/ask/ask.php?ID=2829 Does the cannabis ("G13") in American Beauty really exist?
John Elder (talk) 19:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  G13 an Urban Legend 

message: It pretty sure the yank government would grow green for experiments, especially as it is a widely known fact that they are behind the modern day recipe for acid - which they deveoped for use in interogations. What a lovely government! Makes me glad to be be a Scot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.12.154.191 (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References