lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CREN

message: ----
According to the book "Angels & Demons" by Dan Brown, there is another CREN of Switzerland. According to his book, CREN of Switzerland is factual. I hope some of you might do some research on that.
:That organization is CERN, an advanced particle physics research facility. It's home to one of the world's major particle accelerators.--oknazevad 01:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ko e Iki he Lagi

message: The source of the initial text is Unit 13 of Learning Niuean, Book 2: Tohi Ako Vagahau Niue by Aiao Kaulima & Clive H. Beaumont (). -- pne 14:10, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source of the initial text
Talk:Geraldine Somerville

message: If we say she is descended from past Kings of England, then isn't it unnecessary to say she is related to the current British royal family? By definition, the current British royal family is descended from past Kings of England too. Brequinda 14:35, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you know that the reverse has not happened -- that the IMDb entry was not taken verbatim from this Wikipedia article?71.185.74.177 01:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tautology / Pleonasm?
Talk:Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges

message: "Although his making religion the sole factor of this evolution was a perversion of the historical facts, the book was so consistent throughout, so full of ingenious ideas, and written in so striking a style, that it ranks as one of the masterpieces of the French language in the 19th century."
Why would this be a "perversion of the historical facts"?
"Fustel de Coulanges was the most conscientious of men, the most systematic and uncompromising of historians."
This, as well as much of the article, sounds rather biased.
somebody added this little tid-bit
"This article is ludicrously reverential. If the author wrere still alive it would be called brown-nosing."
It should probably be removed but the article does need to be toned-down a little.199.76.188.135 (talk)
:Please note that our article was extracted from the 1911 edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica. It may well have been carried forward from an earlier edition. NRPanikker (talk) 15:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/AI

message: AI made the following two edits to this case page, changing "/Workshop" to "/Slaveshop": ,
. His/her edits were reverted by Antaeus Feldspar:
. 
Immediately afterward, AI reverted back, with the summary "+AI POV":
, after which I reverted AI:
. I think AI's edits can be safely called vandalism.  [ +t, +c, +m ] 06:27, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Antaeus Feldspar|Antaeus Feldspar]] and [[User:Szyslak|Szyslak]]'s reverts of [[User:AI|AI]] on September 14, 2005 

message: ===AI===
Last September, this user was banned indefinitely by the ArbCom for legal threats. He made one edit to his talk page in October, which was subsequently reverted. However, this past May, he has re-emerged, and now seems to be dominating his talk page. In addition, someone placed a one-year block on top of his indefinite block. Has he resolved his legal threats? If not, should his indefinite block stick and/or his talk page protected? Editor88 03:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an enforcement issue.  As a Wikipedia administrator I've blanked and protected his user talk page. He remains banned and should not edit.  On this occasion I won't reset the ban but any socking will result in a reset. --Tony Sidaway 14:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for clarification copied from [[WP:RFAR]] 

message: Last September, this user was banned indefinitely by the ArbCom for legal threats. He made one edit to his talk page in October, which was subsequently reverted. However, this past May, he has re-emerged, and now seems to be dominating his talk page. In addition, someone placed a one-year block on top of his indefinite block. Has he resolved his legal threats? If not, should his indefinite block stick and/or his talk page protected? Editor88 03:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an enforcement issue.  As a Wikipedia administrator I've blanked and protected his user talk page. He remains banned and should not edit.  On this occasion I won't reset the ban but any socking will result in a reset. --Tony Sidaway 14:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AI
Talk:UXGA

message: I changed "exactly twice the default resolution of SVGA" to "exactly four times the default resolution of SVGA", because SVGA is 800x600=48000 and UXGA is 1600x1200=1920000=4*480000. If you double both side length you quadruple the size.
:You're right, but that's still confusing.  I totally read it wrong the first time.  I added clarification in parenthesis.  Bilbo1507 21:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: HP uses the term UXGA for a resolution of 1920x1200 in their Maintenance and Service Guide for HP Compaq Business Notebook nx7000, Document Part Number: 325388-002, page 6-3 (139).  --HelgeStenstrom 08:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative resolution 

message: My CRT monitor runs at 1920x1440 resolution and I see quite a few such 19 and 21-inch monitors supporting it, but this resolution seems to be left out in the *GA articles.  Would it be UXGA (which is 1600x1200 for 4:3 aspect ratio), UXGA+ (doesn't seem to exist), or maybe QXGA (this goes to 2048x1536)?  It's been unlisted on Wikipedia for at least a year and I've been wondering what *GA acronym it is referenced as.  Ulillillia (talk) 22:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What would the 1920x1440 resolution be? 

message: I didn't get much sleep last night, so I may be missing something, but it certainly appears as though the comparison chart is for widescreen displays, as for the WUXGA article.--Rfsmit (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong comparison chart 

message: The Sony VAIO P series has an 8" screen @ 1600x768 UWXGA Excogitation (talk) 23:12, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about UWXGA
Talk:Pondus

message: From the article:
:Just recently we got the unbelivebly news that Jokke and Camilla are expecting a baby (congratulations).
May I remind you that they are fictional characters?  — JIP | Talk 15:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's taken out of the article now anyway Sam Vimes 15:41, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

text: It's not something you'd find in an encyclopedia, though - it's a matter of style, really. Sam Vimes 14:46, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Snip

message: I am sorely disappointed to not find a single mention of Roger! --Majushi
:I put in a bit on him. MURGH disc. 03:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Roger
Talk:Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art

message: Anyone out there have any knowledge of the sculpture here? I think it's Barbara Hepworth but it would good to have some detail. SeanMack 15:49, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Richard Carpenter (screenwriter)

message: "(With Michael Praed, later Jason Connery)"? Wouldn't it be more informative to write it as: "(Starring Michael Praed, later Jason Connery)" or "(Starring Michael Praed in the first two seasons and Jason Connery in the third season)"? The current text suggests that Praed and Connery helped Carpenter write the scripts. Peter Knutsen 15:55, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Further to the correction to the date of birth made by Richard Carpenter's daughter (diff), a search on FreeBMD reveals 9 individuals named Richard Carpenter who had births registered between 1928 and 1935; but only one in or anywhere near King's Lynn, namely Richard M. Carpenter (mother's maiden-name Winkley), registered in the September-December quarter of 1929.  This therefore represents independent documentary evidence for the change.
Jheald (talk) 13:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 
Talk:Hit Man manual

message: Per "Hit Man" being in the public domain, there was an hour long show on A&E that covered the murder and when discussing the court case it did mention that Paladin gave up their copyright to the book. It has aired numerous times (I've seen it atleast 3 times), but without an exact quote or other source to prove this (will search later) I will resist editing the page.
The A&E show was called "Blueprint for a Murder", if anyone can get a hold of it (or another source) and confirm the public domain dispute it would be appreciated.
I wrote to Paladin Press about the copyrights of this book and here is what they said: "Thank you for your e-mail. The copyrights are held by the author at this time – this book is not in the public domain." --Eric Ashford 23:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

message: *Strong Merge - same book - undoubtedly merge - in fact why ask just do it. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 11:36, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Arup Group

message: I have added an  tag to this article because of extensive editing by a UPE sockfarm, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaktheladz for evidence. The article will need a thorough review ensuring due weight, neutral language, and use of reliable sources before the tag is removed. MarioGom (talk) 14:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, my name is Dan and I work for Arup. You can see below I have been suggesting factual changes where I can see information is out of date or incorrect. I’m keen to understand what we can do to prove that we’re engaging with the community in accordance with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and ultimately show that the undisclosed paid edits tag is no longer warranted. I hope the track record of the edits I've outlined shows that this is not a practice we engage in now. I’d appreciate your guidance on this.  Arup Dan (talk) 15:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undisclosed paid edits 

message: Hi everyone, 
This is Dan from Arup again. We noticed that an “Undisclosed paid edits” tag has been listed on this page since just over two years ago. This is certainly not a practice we engage in now and I hope the track record of the edits I've outlined shows this. Are there any outstanding inaccuracies or edits that would need to be removed for this tag to be removed? 
We're keen to work with the community to make this happen.
Thank you,
Dan  Arup Dan (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Undisclosed paid edits' tag
Talk:Column chromatography

message: * There are at least two different methods used to perform the column chromatography described here.  One involves adding the separable material as a solid pre-prepared on silica gel and then topping this layer with sand, the other involves drawing the separable material as a liquid into a sand layer. The article is easier to understand the way it was before I edited it, however it was misinforming.  If nothing is said then I will come back and rewrite it to include both techniques, but this will likely make it more difficult to understand...      Also the photo is a cool historic image, but the columns don't have resevoirs on them, the solid phase is right to the top, this is something a little different than described in the article.
- Flaskman
:The article is indeed in need of retooling.  As mentioned, only one method is described (no mention of different packing and loading methods).  Also the introductory section gets into rather specific information that might be better suited for a "techniques" section. Bottledmark 02:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How unspecific are we supposed to make the article? 

message: * no link between Column chromatography and HPLC try google on Column chromatography
* if your really have to disambiguate start column chromatography (disambiguation) page 
* a move action destroys the history of the article
* when editors move an article they should take care of broken links
* the new Preparative chromatography article header does not reflect content (not about prep. TLC or many other prep. techniques)
* external link (reference or sources) was provided but not replicated in second move.
* article name should be in bold
* prep article should link back to diambiguation page
V8rik
V8rik has reinstated the old version of Column chromatography, I have made the new Preparative chromatography article a redirect to Chromatography. Several chromatographic techniques (e.g. HPLC, TLC) can be used on a preparative scale.
(Prevously I had accidentally reinstated the poor version of Column chromatography because I was editing the old version while V8rik made his changes.)
Cacycle 19:33, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  this should not be disambiguation, move poorly executed 

message: The sample experiment in the "Systems" section is, at the least, unencyclopædic. Bottledmark (talk) 03:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant Information 

message: Hey Overall good job on your article!   Nice images!   The only thing I noticed that really needs to be fixed is that you have an image insert that isn't showing up since its still a .png format.  Other than that it looks good!
 Srah27 (talk) 16:54, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarah's Comments
Talk:Barium sulfate

message: Shouldn't this perhaps be merged with Barite? --Pinnerup 05:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A good way to handle this common problem is to strip barite of most of its non-mineral content and insert the phrase .  This way the readers get focused reports, and we minimize duplication of effort.  Not that I have any special power or insight.--Smokefoot 10:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I'm not sure if this exists, or if so what it is. I can only find reference to acoustic foam, not anacoustic foam. Is this a typographical error? 86.16.21.237 (talk) 21:45, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anacoustic foam?

message: I don't think BaSO4 is the same as baryta as stated. Baryta says it's barium hydroxide. I don't know. User:altaphon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.109.73 (talk) 02:56, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but that's incorrect.  It didn't make sense to me because the sulfate is extremely insoluble in water, while the hydroxide is soluble.  I verified that conclusion with some readings in photographic technical books.  Read the reference I cited. I will-revert the deletion.  --Zeamays (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

text: I have also edited the redirect that caused the confusion.  The reference is:  Salvaggio, Nanette L. Basic Photographic Materials and Processes. Taylor & Francis US, Oct 27, 2008. p. 362. --Zeamays (talk) 21:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Not same as barium hydroxide

message: I looked up this article because I read in a book on Wedgwood pottery that Barium Sulphate was a major ingredient in Josiah Wedgwood's famous Jasper Ware, and I wondered what it was and where Wedgwood obtained it. I don't know if the substance is still used in ceramics, but if it is maybe some more knowledgeable person could add something.109.149.31.4 (talk) 15:41, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used in ceramics? 

message: Hi, the image here looks like it is exactly the same as the image for BaN3 on the barium azide page. I'm not sure if the image is showing BaSO4 or BaN3, but it seems that one of the images is incorrect and needs to be removed/replaced. Sticklink (talk) 13:10, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the barium azide image was copied from the one on this page. I’m theoretically not opposed to using the same image as an illustration (under very specific circumstances), but that copy cannot exist with its current author claiming to own it. I suggest nominating that file for deletion on commons, and we can go from there. — HTGS (talk) 12:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image same as BaN3
Talk:Allen Park, Michigan

message: To interested parties:  I am removing the unsourced statement about Money Magazine, as I have not been able to locate evidence to support it.  I reviewed the "Best Small Cities" lists for 2005 through 2008 and found that Allen Park was mentioned as a "contender" in 2007, but did not make the Top 100.  It was not mentioned in 2005 or 2006, and is listed as one of many "other" cities in 2008 that did not make the list. Joncaire (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Money Magazine unsourced statements

message: This page of the website cited in the high school article seems to prove that the district was operating a high school (on the site of another district school) no later than 1952, not 1955: "The 'new' Lapham School ...housed kindergarten through 12th grade until the high school was opened in 1955. In 1952, the high school rowing team won the national championship." Broglin, Sharon. Allen Park. Arcadia Publishing, 2007. ISBN 0738551090, 9780738551098. p. 43  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.90.136.149 (talk) 04:30, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How old is Allen Park High School? 

message: Dabmaster8 (talk) 22:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 22:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2019
Talk:Power Princess

message: I don't have the comic, since I just browsed it at a bookstore. Can any regular reader confirm this? JCCyC 21:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I believe PP killed the real Claire Debussy and assumed her identity

message: :After he asked her what she thought about the name, she said Princess of Power would be better, but the General said that it was already copyrighted
That should be "trademarked". Is this an error on behalf of this article, or is the wrong term actually used in the comic itself? If the error is in the article, it should be changed to "trademarked"; if the error is taken from the comic, it should be pointed out as such, if nothing else with a [sic] remark.--132.252.185.42 (talk) 11:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Copyrighted"?
Talk:Princess Lalla Meryem of Morocco

message: *per Wikipedia Convention on naming royals (for reference please see Princess Lalla Salma of Morocco. Antares911 16:41, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ship breaking

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Nancy talk 18:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: The article concentrates on the economic, ethical, and environmental aspects of ship breaking, but says little about the techniques employed.  An encyclopedia article on ship breaking needs to explain how was it done in the past, and and how is it done now.  Presumably ship breaking yards should be located in a somewhat sheltered location, a harbor,  with a gently sloping sandy beach, and presumably it is best to beach ships at high tide and disassemble them at low tide.  Is a big tidal range helpful, or a nuisance?  What is the technique for deliberately beaching a ship?  After an earlier unsuccessful attempt, the ferry Ostend Spirit was beached successfully at high speed into a gap between between two smaller, already beached ships, that may have been placed there to help hold the ferry upright, facilitating demolition.  How are the large pieces of steel removed for scrap (presumably with acetylene torches), and how are they taken away?  Are cranes and electromagnets used, as in scrap steel processing yards in developed countries?CharlesHBennett (talk) 14:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs section on technique and technology, both present and historically
Talk:Prince Moulay Rachid of Morocco

message: *per Wikipedia convention on naming royals (for reference please see Princess Lalla Salma of Morocco.
Antares911 16:44, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article smacks of POV. I'm surprised there's not a section on him hanging the moon. Soonercary (talk) 14:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV!

message: Just take this line for example:
"In 2000 under the brave leadership of Prince Moulay Rachid was founded Hassan II golf Trophy Association, which is hosting one of the most highly regarded Hassan II Golf Trophy."
Because we all realize that it takes such courage and bravery to host a golf outing.  
Please, someone fix this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.98.24 (talk) 22:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is really biased! 
Talk:Princess Lalla Asma of Morocco

message: *per Wikipedia convention on naming royals (for reference please see Princess Lalla Salma of Morocco) Antares911 16:45, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:WPSS-new

message: Adding another word type plus a bit more - this was really very confusing before - and risked stopping people (like me) from adding the stub template. Last time, i thought every single adding of a stub template had to be put up for prior discussion. Maybe i'm just dumb, but there are probably lots of others out there just as dumb... Boud 17:08, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworded it slightly, incorporating your idea of creation, and hopefully improving the flow. --TheParanoidOne 17:16, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RFC to dissolve Wikiproject Stub Sorting. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notification of RfC affecting this page
Talk:Kaniv

message: I have no problem with Polish names at all (and I used them myself even in this very article). But to keep it in the first line, please show that Polish name is frequently used in English language. Google test shows plenty of Kaniv and Kanev, and  not Kaniow. I am not itching to remove it asap, but please do respond at some point. --Irpen 22:12, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Polish name of that place is quite relevant, both for its importance during the PLC times and for the battle. There is quite a few English, French or German books using the Polish rather than Russian or Ukrainian name. , , , , , , , , , , , , , ...... Does it hurt so much to have the Polish name of the place in the lead? //Halibutt 08:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Polish name
File talk:Windows 9X BSOD.png

message: This is not an XP BSOD. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 17:22, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, this is identical to one that my mom gets on Windows ME sometimes. In fact, it's referenced as WinME on the Blue Screen of Death page. ~ Oni Lukos (No, that's not my real name) c
Windows, even older versions, are copyrighted software and thus this is not PD.  Not sure how you could take a screenshot of a BSOD outside of an emulator though. — Jesse's Girl | Talk 16:16, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I took this screenshot in VMware; does it matter? --tyomitch 14:03, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

text: its possible to modify a photograph of the bluescreen. you just need to blood-fill the background and use a digital camera.ne0pets22 (talk) 10:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

message: I'm having trouble uploading a new screenshot. I'll try to figure it out. Sorry for any inconvenience. --Akhristov 00:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trouble uploading 

message: It clearly states to press Enter to return and CTRL+ALT+DEL to restart. So why does it say "Press any key to continue"?  =D Cyklopas (talk) 13:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Click to continue