lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thomas Charles-Edwards

message: I've added TCE to various categories and had a go at improving the basic details, but there's still more that needs to be done. Bencherlite 10:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Jesus" is part of the title and not an inaccurate reflection of the college at which it is held.  See the official announcement in the University Gazette [], his entry in the list of British Academy Fellows [] etc - in fact, any Google search for "Jesus Professor of Celtic" will show the accuracy of this title.  Compare the Merton Professor of English Language - a Professorial Fellowship at Merton, yes, but that doesn't meant that Merton isn't part of the title of the Professorship []  Bencherlite 21:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus Professor of Celtic
Talk:Equivalent carbon content

message: Are the equations for the calculation of equivalent carbon content empirically derived or elsewise?  Mawkish1983 (talk) 13:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, empirically derived. Bernoullies (talk) 13:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empirical, heurestical or theoretical?
Talk:Circulation

message: circulation:working of heart
…It is Interesting that there is not a topic about the circulation of currency.
I do understand that there is a recommendation of certain forms of Currency, though yet no conclusive subject on the Circulation of the matter.
D.G.DeL-Dorchester Mass 4:52 P.M. E.S.T.24.63.13.65 (talk) 21:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Rhamphospermum nigrum

message: Hello to the botanists out there... I was just looking at an Italian recipe that calls for a vegetable called "cavolo nero".  On the Italian Wikipedia, this appears under the entry "Brassica" with the scientific name "Brassica nigra".  So, assuming there haven't been any mistakes made, either by me, the authors of this page, or the authors of that Italian page, it seems that another major use of Black Mustard--the greens, that is--is as a "dinner veggie", particularly in Italian cooking.  Another name which I found online is "Tuscan cabbage" although this doesn't appear in the English Wikipedia, nor did I notice an Italian version of this name on the Italian Wikipedia (though I don't speak Italian so I may have simply missed it).
Anyway this seems like very relevant information that ought to be included on the page!--after being properly confirmed of course.  Thanks--
Neoprote
The clue is in the name "Tuscan cabbage" - or black kale as it is known in Britain - cavolo nero is a member of the Brassica oleracea group FlagSteward 22:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old discussions 

message: This article says, Brassica nigra is about 90 cm tall, something I believe is roughly correct. Parable of the Mustard Seed claims the plant to be much taller. Which is correct? --Vigilius (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mustard in the bible 

message: The number of seeds is not constant and as the picture shows it is commonly much larger than four.85.76.70.209 (talk) 23:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four seeds
Talk:Football at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's qualification

message: The document assumes that head-to-head results are the first tie-breaker for the AFC qualification (that is why Australia is deemed qualified in the men's section and why Thailand is ahead of South Korea is its women's group.
But, is that the case?  The latest posts on the AFC website [Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, DPR Korea and Iraq sail through] for example, suggest this is not so - and that goal difference is the tie-breaker.  I do not know the true position, but GD was the tie-breaker in all cases for Athens (or, according to the FIFA regs it should have been).Jlsa 12:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tie-breakers in the AFC

message: Is time to split i think, 41KB, if i read it, i will bored. Split to men and women qualification separately. --Aleenf1 17:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Why is england (or GBR) not qualified for the Olympics? They did make the semi-final in the European Under 21 championship.
*Great Britain has never participated in Olympic football since each nation has a different association. Azuran 20:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uefa 

message: The CONCAF section is taking a lot of space relative to other confederations, and we already have 2008 CONCACAF Men's Pre-Olympic Tournament with the same information. If no one has objections, I will just move the content over to the sub-article and leave a wikilink there. The semifinals are tomorrow (March 20) and the two finalists will qualify, so for the purpose of this article, that's all we need, I think. --Mosmof (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CONCACAF
Talk:Treaty of Westminster (1674)

message: If the Dutch won the 3rd Anglo-Dutch war, how come they lost New Amsterdam ?
62.173.88.59 10:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They traded the recaptured New Amsterdam for the English recognizing Dutch sovereignty over Suriname. English colonization had swamped New Amsterdam, so the Dutch decided that they'd rather solidfy their claim on a profitable colony.  — Laura Scudder ☎ 15:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Staten Land redirects to New Zealand- that can't be right. Tigerboy1966  17:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This has since been rectified.--MWAK (talk) 18:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staten Land 
Talk:List of Boletus species

message: It just occurred to me - should we make this a list of species of the genus Boletus or all Boletes (i.e. Boletaceae or Boletales............) Cas Liber 10:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm all for turning this into a list of Boletales. While the list will inevitably become bulky and will need regular taxonomic updating, I feel this is the best solution to avoid ommission of species all belonging to several genera and even families all at once in their synonymy, such as Gyroporus castaneus, Gyrodon lividus, and Buchwaldoboletus lignicola.--Paffka (talk) 19:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm of the opposite opinion: Boletus alone has over 300 species, and I think is evidently size-worthy of its own list. The 9th ed of Dictionary of the Fungi (now 8 years old) says 1025 species in the Boletales. How about instead I start genus-level articles for all the Boletales genera that are currently missing, and then add species lists to each of them (or split off individual "List of .... species" when numbers warrant it)? Sasata (talk) 19:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

text: That is also all right, but I don't know how we'll get over the problem of species belonging to several genera and shifting taxonomic opinion. It's not as easy as separating Lactarius from Russula. My guide is generally Index Fungorum in determining current classification and species independence, the only regret being the lack of confirmation for many taxons local to North America and other continents.--Paffka (talk) 13:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Category talk:User non-4

message: Norrœna did not begin to appear until the 13th and 14th, only gradually replacing dönsk tunga, so strictly speaking it is incorrect here.  However, since only a native speaker of Icelandic who is knowledgeable in Old Norse could properly qualify for non-4, in a sense it is sort of correct.  Of course this does not apply to non-natives such as User:Nforbes who lists him/herself here along with several dozen other languages, although Old Norse is not recorded as a sign language.  Wyeson 10:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Capite censi

message: Is this an English term if so pease add a source to a verifiable source if it is not an English term then it should be made clear in the article,  see List of legal Latin terms for examples --Philip Baird Shearer 10:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a legal term as such, in the same way "welfare recipients" is not a legal term in English. Obtaining a verifiable source should not be too difficult. The term is recorded in various older encyclopaedias for instance. I'll add an example citation to article. Donama (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Verifiable source

message: The lack of a permanent demobilization process run by the government in Marius' military reform would help facilitate the demise of the Roman Republic.[citation needed]
Plutarch. "Fall of the Roman Republic." Translated with Introduction and Notes by Rex Warner, Revised with translations of Comparisons and a Preface by Robin Seager, with Series Preface by Christopher Pelling. Penguin Classics, 2005. page 4.  Tnlaw415 (talk) 03:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  verification for citation needed
Template talk:Cinema of Argentina

message: I think this is an excellent template - though it maybe needs the "v • d • e" thing on the side, which seems to be standard in templates now (ie. see here).  Are there any templates like this for other countries?  If not, I think it would be a fine idea to make some. Esn 11:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other countries?

message: I see the flag is smaller, what made you change that?  Best..Luigibob 11:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag
Talk:JC de Vera

message: You have no rights to copy your article (JC De Vera) with this article (Fox Crime).  You are the same person who did to Yasmien Kurdi article. Does GMA Artist Center of GMA Network knows this controversial issues using their talents as a scandal???  This is all act of VANDALISM.
Some People use when search this article to said any of the philippine actor or actress. Remember it is already double. You use her or him as a scandal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.213.143.93 (talk) 04:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: JC De Vera used copy to Fox Crime Article

message: Permission to text sir. 😂😂 I really admire your acting skills. Congrats. I love you. Suffica Sesay (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A message
Talk:Hardcore Justice

message: Shouldn't the Pacman Jones segment be mentioned?  I forget between which match the segment was done. TonyFreakinAlmeida 13:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 

message: *No other article is named Hard Justice.--WillC 22:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Says who? When was that rule established? Gavyn Sykes (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[TNA Hard Justice]] → [[Hard Justice]]

message: A warning to other editors/moderators - someone keeps "correcting" the 2010 page with erroneous details. At this time, it's not known if the name change is permanent, so we should avoid representing it as such as it's unlikely to be the case. Also, the mysterious corrector keeps changing the page to say the main event is Rob Van Dam vs. Jerry Lynn - this hasn't been so much as reported anywhere, even in the less reputable sheets, and seems exceptionally unlikely as Jerry Lynn hasn't been seen in TNA in four years and was merely rumoured to be returning to the promotion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.180.2.209 (talk) 00:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 

message: The logo at the top of the page should be reverted to the old one, the current one isn't a representation of the whole Hard Justice lineage as only one event is called Hardcore Justice and all signs point to it going back to being called Hard Justice next year. 212.240.128.45 (talk) 10:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo image
Talk:Ghost leg

message: I support the merge, Amidakuji and Ghost Leg really are the same thing... both articles have interesting information about the topic; the Amidakuji article is more accessible and easier to read, but it's worth keeping the mathematical analysis found here — although that part deserves a good rewriting to a more concise form. --Patrick Bernier 11:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge: [[Amidakuji]]

message: It's not easy to understand step 4 from the diagram. I read it, and my immediate question was "How do you trace your path?". It looks like there are many different possible paths, and there is nothing to stop contestants from choosing the one that's most advantageous to them. I know this is explained in more detail in the main text, but it seems as if the diagram was meant to be self-sufficient, and in that respect I think it falls short. 86.186.34.238 (talk) 00:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Imo. it's not the text, but the diagram itself that adds misunderstanding. By marking the route for "C", of all routes, on first glance it makes it look as if there was a rule to always follow to the right, until you hit the rightmost vertical line and then always to the left - and then it doesn't make sense anymore (every route would then end in 2 or 6). Every other route in that diagram would have been clearer. All but route "C" would show unmistakenly that the route is to follow every horizintal line it encounters, no matter if to the right or to the left. So I suggest changing that. 46.142.44.144 (talk) 06:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Added new version of image to address above concerns. Violetine (talk) 00:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram text could be clearer 

message: Isn't there a song you're supposed to sing while you trace your path?  Could some Japanese person shed some light on this? 70.116.13.152 (talk) 04:24, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song? 

message: I removed the sentence "The more lines that are added, the more unpredictable the final outcome is." The outcome is always predictable, in fact it is 100% so. More lines make it more difficult to grasp quickly what the outcome is, but that is irrelevant for prediction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.181.84.236 (talk) 06:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predictability 

message: I believe that bubblization identity 1 is only valid if there is either no vertical line to the right of the pattern, or if there is, that it does not contain a leg. Otherwise you'd end up with two legs next to each other, which is undefined. Illustration I made that shows the problem: https://i.imgur.com/cRqWXmj.png 2600:8800:7900:1A9:9173:2803:CFC1:BC12 (talk) 06:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bubblization
Talk:The Cuckoo (film)

message: IIRC the Finn is placed not simply in a "German uniform" but an SS uniform…also I had the impression that the soldiers that did this to him were German not Finnish (thus not his compatriots)?Historian932 (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  German uniform 
Talk:University system

message: Currently this article seems to be implying the term is used internationally but I've never heard it applied to non-US institutions. Here in the UK a lot of universities have multiple campuses (because of both mergers and many being located in cities with limited scope for single site expansion) but there are almost never any separate identities for different campuses and a lot of degree courses have teaching at more than one campus. (The main exceptions tend to be medical schools and, for a limited time, institutions that have merged in taking time to shed their separate identity.) If there's anything that one might consider analagous to a university system it would be the federal universities of London and Wales, although with some very loose usage. Timrollpickering 11:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Term used internationally?

message: I'd like to propose the list in Examples be replaced with a :Category:University systems (and perhaps a disjoint :Category:Multiple-campus universities). Vagary 06:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter's not terribly workable because "campus" isn't always defined. A lot of urban universities use separate buildings and bandy terms like "campus" and "site" around with little regard. Timrollpickering 07:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with User:Timrollpickering. "Multiple-campus" is just an adjective I was using to distinguish single universities from university systems. --JHP 20:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples &rarr; Category 

message: Would these be analogous to university systems or do they deserve a separate article? I'm thinking of things like the University of London (a complicated one in itself due to lots of university-wide elements and history), the University of Wales (ditto) and the Federal University of Surrey (which only lasted four years and one of the two institutions wasn't actually in modern Surrey!). There may be other examples internationally? Timrollpickering 15:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal universities 

message: The University of Arizona only has one campus - as indeed indicated in the list. Therefore it is not a system and should not be included in the list. I removed it. If it is to be included, please explain why. Jusfiq (talk) 21:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Arizona 

message: The lead of this article is becoming overlong, and the information on some countries (particularly ones with smaller higher ed systems like Vietnam and the Philippines) is becoming undue. I would suggest trimming down the lead, and moving the more detailed information on how university systems work in each country to the sections in which the systems are listed. Cheers, Sdkb talk 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article organization
Template talk:MaoriMonarchs

message: I replaced the image used in this template with one actually associated with the Māori monarchs. This image was used as a masthead on a newspaper published by the monarchy in the late 1900s. I felt that although the Māori sovereignty flag is an attractive image, its use is inappropriate as its association with the Māori monarchs is tenuous to say the least. Kahuroa 11:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Enormous Omelet Sandwich

message: Let's be honest there is no reason to have two seperate articles on essentially the same thing.. EnsRedShirt 11:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed changed the Merge headers as such. EnsRedShirt 23:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: In regards to the recent edits in this section, your reasoning is flawed:
On fast food restaurants with breakfast menus:
* There are only about a half dozen major QSR (Quick Serve Restaurants, industry parlance for fast food) chains that provide breakfast
* McD's and BK are the only two truly national chains that offer breakfast, Wendy's has yet to expand their breakfast line nationally.
* Other chains such as Jack-in-the-Box, Sonic, Carls Jr. and Hardees do not have the national presence, but do compete in the QSR market regionally.
In regards to breakfast sandwiches:
* There are only about four or five articles on competitive breakfast sandwiches, so only those articles that exist can be listed.
* The See also, Breakfast products from other vendors: is a sampling of other providers, not every product from every restaurant in the US that serves breakfast.
While there are easily be 5000 possible breakfast foods, and listing them as per your initial argument, would make the article unwieldy argument has flaws. It is only a sampling, limited to specific competitive products from the direct QSR competitors. Is adding a list all of Kellogg's breakfast cereals because people eat that for breakfast necessary? No, while Kellogg's does make breakfast products, they are not a restaurant chain. Does Denny's Grand Slam Breakfast need to be included? No, because Denny's is not a QSR chain, and neither are Friendly's, Waffle House, Big Boy et al (they are considered Family Style Restaurants in industry parlance).
Apples to apples, oranges to oranges is what it comes down to
To have a NPOV does not require you to provide every possible combination of every possible vendor with every possible combination of product. To provide a sampling of products from appropriate competitors is unto itself a NPOV, as you acknowledge the competitors and show that they have comparable products.
Jerem43 18:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. It's an article about this particular sandwich. I don't see links to burger king products on McDonalds sandwiches, and neither should there be. This is an encyclopedia, not a consumer guide to food. I feel to have links to a rival's product on any kind of product-related article is wrong, unless the comparison itself has been the focus of interest and coverage. DrumCarton 20:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen references on other articles to competitors products, I believe. I will look and see. Jerem43 01:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also
Category talk:African athletics biography stubs

message: I have proposed a split of this category to add a template for Moroccan athletes,  as there appear to be over 40 of these. Also to give Nigerian athletes there own category namelayas there are over 60 articles using the template. To comment on these please go to WP:WSS/P. Waacstats 11:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Harold Edward Bindloss

message: I'm proofreading a book by Bindloss at Distributed Proofreaders and wanted to learn more about the author. There seems to be close to nothing available online. So I've started an article, which will perhaps attract more information. 
A bibliography could perhaps be assembled from the list of his used books for sale at ABEbooks. I couldn't find a bibliography online. Zora 12:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would a list of his books help? (I'm not familar with Wikipedia protocols) http://www.authorandbookinfo.com/ngcoba/bi.htm -- search for Bindloss -- there are dozens of titles, but no publisher data. --Logista 02:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled