Talk:Rosie Webster

message: :Image:RosieWebster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:RosieWebster.jpg

message: This is probably a hoax as the the top two results for 'Rosie Webstar triplets' on Google are this article and John Stape. Google search. LizzieHarrison 14:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triplets 

message: How much does the editor know about Rosie Webster?  There is hardly anything here that points towards a knowledgable expert, is there!?!
Rachypie12 20:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Details

message: Where's the storyline about John Stape giving Rosie 150K.Mind you it did only happen yesterday.(written Tues 16th June,Episode aired Mon 15th June.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.26.205 (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Windfall!?

message: RAIN*the*ONE BAM 15:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rosie Webster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071024033026/http://www.corrieblog.tv/2006/04/so_whats_it_lik.html to http://www.corrieblog.tv/2006/04/so_whats_it_lik.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've made a major edit to reduce the amount of in-universe writing and as a result limited the character's page to four areas: story line, characterization, casting, and reception. 
My objective of the story line was to provide an overview of the character's arc on the show with minimal discussion of motivations or events that ultimately resolved with no major story changes. This was one person's attempt and I'm open to revisions, especially those that can be backed by citation of their significance given that the section is almost entirely original research in violation of Wikipedia:PSTS.
Characterization is intended to provide factual information about the development of the character from its actors, writers, and producers. At the moment it focuses on appearance, as that was the original material provided on this page.
Casting was simplified to discussion of who is playing the role during a given time frame and reduce extraneous quotes or background (such as the mention of a Radio Times crossover).
Reception was left largely unchanged.
Additional discussion is warmly welcomed. Vegantics (talk) 21:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-universe writing style