Template talk:Extra chronology/Archive 1

message: ==Square  brackets in the instructions==
Are we leaving the brackets in the usage instructions, or should they be removed, as with Template:Infobox Single? Flowerparty☀ 23:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is urgent, he also broke any use of  with a second chonrology field. — Ian Moody (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: reverted. Flowerparty☀ 20:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) has a problem connected to this. As well as being an album, it needs an entry in the singles chronology (an edited version was released as a 45). The colour is wrong, but with the album infobox colours in a state of flux at the moment changing it manually wouldn't be a great idea.... can this be fixed? --kingboyk 14:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. It's fixed now. --Kristbg 22:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. Flowerparty☀ 18:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Are we leaving the brackets in the usage instructions, or should they be removed, as with Template:Infobox Single? Flowerparty☀ 23:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Square  brackets in the instructions

message: Could some please revert the last change by Ed g2s again? It still seems to break all usages of Infobox Single that use the chronology... --Fritz S. (Talk) 18:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is urgent, he also broke any use of  with a second chonrology field. — Ian Moody (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: reverted. Flowerparty☀ 20:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken 

message: "center" is no a valid value for the valign attribute. I suppose it should be valign="middle". --Stijn Vermeeren 11:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valign 

message: A concern was raised recently over at the Wikiproject talk page for albums, regarding the clash observed when this template is used in articles. Is there any particular reason '#ffff00' was the assigned value for the background? Is it possible to have the background be determined by the the album infobox background instead? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 15:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) has a problem connected to this. As well as being an album, it needs an entry in the singles chronology (an edited version was released as a 45). The colour is wrong, but with the album infobox colours in a state of flux at the moment changing it manually wouldn't be a great idea.... can this be fixed? --kingboyk 14:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background field 

message: In a regular single infobox the previous, current, and next single are in small text size, but when the Extra Chronology is used, it's regular sized. Shouldn't they match up and both be small>? --Thankyoubaby 15:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It's fixed now. --Kristbg 22:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text Size 

message: Could someone possibly go over to the  template and add a Type field similar to this template? To distinguish track listings of EPs, compilations etc. -- Reaper  X 19:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Colour help with Extra track listing

message: Could we move the documentation to a subpage, Template:Extra chronology/doc? --Lockal (talk) 17:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Flowerparty☀ 18:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get documentation to subpage