lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aleksandër Moisiu University of Durrës

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Dana boomer (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Pelvetia

message: The removal of the name of the authority's name is debatable. The authority is kept in the site of other species.Osborne 10:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The authorities' names are present in the taxobox, which is probably where most readers will look for purely taxonomic/nomenclatural information. Abbreviated is the more usual form in scientific publications, which doesn't pose a problem so long as they are linked to the relevant articles about the scientists, as is the case here. The fact that other articles do it differently is no argument; they should probably be changed. Most lay-persons do not realise that a scientific name needs an authority, and find extra words like "Stackhouse" or "L." confusing, because their meaning is not readily apparent. That sort of detail should be reserved for the taxobox, where the context is sufficiently clear. Most publications intended for the general public do not include the authority, and it is their lead which Wikipedia should follow in its articles. --Stemonitis 07:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, many scientific names have become part of common parlance, but that is largely a separate issue. Indeed, the two do not always match up, as the recent move of Geranium showed (scientific name preferred over common name, which normally refers to Pelargonium, for reasons I've never understood). Policy and practice at Wikipedia differ in different areas, and there are now conflicting guidelines over the use of common versus scientific names. The general policy is to use common names of things in all circumstances, but WikiProject Plants has decided to favour scientific names in almost all circumstances. I suppose it's a matter of debate whether brown algae come under the remit of WP:PLANTS, since although they are not plants, they do fall under the same nomenclatural code. My personal preference would be for scientific names in the majority of cases, but my understanding of naming policy is that it (and therefore most readers) favours the common name. That's why one of the articles I wrote is at toothed wrack — I would have preferred Fucus serratus, and I didn't even know the common name until I came to write the article for Wikipedia. In this case, if we rely only on Google hits, "Pelvetia canaliculata" beats "channel(l)ed wrack" by a few orders of magnitude — it seems that when people write about this seaweed, they use its scientific name. The mere existence of a common name does not (thankfully) automatically make it any more common than the scientific name, and article titling must be decided on a case-by-case basis. Here, I think everyone favours the scientific name, but that needn't apply to any other organism. --Stemonitis 09:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Authority in text

message: Pelvetia canaliculata extract is an ingredient in cosmetics to reduce eye circles. Ingredients, Malibu Glitz Eye Circle Therapy: 
https://picclick.com/Malibu-Glitz-Eye-Circle-Therapy-03-OZ-222520890790.html 
https://cosmetics.specialchem.com/inci/pelvetia-canaliculata-extract
Drsruli (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eye Circle Therapy
Talk:Ersekë

message: The use of adjectives in English isn't limited to ethnic groups, as paradoxically stated in this edit summary []. Adjectives can be also used for governments and political entities: as the name "Autonomous Republic of Northern Epirus" suggests the appropriate adjective for the armed forces of this political entity is "Northern Epirote". I assume that's too easy to understand even for readers with elementary level English skills.Alexikoua (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Elementary English skills
Talk:Gramsh (municipality)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Gramsh, Albania. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 6#Gramsh, Albania until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gramsh, Albania" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:FC Gramozi

message: This article has less number of citations kindly provide proper citations and try to improve article according to Wikipedia policies and if you allow my self I can certainly help you in expanding it. Thanks.-- Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 15:14, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations required 
Talk:Koja e Kuçit

message: Or is it simply part of the Kuči? It all points to this.--Zoupan (talk) 22:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "Koja e Kuçit" which means "Kojë in Kuči", refers to the village of Koći in Podgorica, Montenegro. This article, which contains promotion of "First intellectuals [descending from families from Koći] who completed University degrees", and several images which are obviously taken from some site (see :File:Panoram.jpg, which, as the others, has a clear grey-brownish border at the bottom), and overall is original research. As "Koja e Kuçit" is found once in Google Books, I would propose to delete and redirect the page to Koći.--Zoupan 19:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:57, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Koja / Koći are considered a separate "tribe" by Malësors. In its defense, we could merge some information into the Koći article. Perhaps just save the surnames and the so-called "Seven Heroes of Koja" from the Battle of Dečić, if they exist at all. The rest seems redundant. --Prevalis (talk) 00:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this clan exist?

message: Sorry, I'm a bit confused about what Serbian truncation has to do with the names of these Albanian tribes...For example: Albanian: Ulaj  Uljaj Serbian: Ul(j)ević) Does this mean that Uljevici are related or descended -and vice versa- from the Uljaj tribe OR is Uljevic simply how we pronounce these particular Albanian last names? Just Curious 174.91.8.151 (talk) 07:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Albanians were forced to Serbianize their surnames whilst in Yugoslavia for socio-economic reasons. Albanians were largely looked down upon and had a better chance finding a job if their last names ended with -ić. Ultimately, Ulaj is the Albanian version, and Uljević is the Serbian version they adopted. For most, officially, you will continue to find the Serbian version of their surname on their legal documents. However, informally, they use the Albanian version of their surnames when speaking to friends, acquaintances, family, etc. Many are in fact returning to their old surnames, but, again, most continue to use their Serbianized surnames. It's a rather complicated issue. --Prevalis (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean? 

message: I would like to have all the work from Koja e Kuçit version either attached or left alone to Koci version. All information in Koja e Kuçit version was up to date. Lets discuss the process Obarac (talk) 04:03, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would like to have all the work from Koja e Kuçit version either attached or left alone to Koci version. All information in Koja e Kuçit version was up to date. Lets discuss the process
Talk:Castle of Krujë

message: This article is completely written on the Albanain point of view, here's the proof:
"The Conqueror" himself could not break the castle's small defenses. 
"and a source of inspiration to Albanians."
The tone in these sentences should be neutralized and properly be sourced.--Alperen (talk) 11:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albanian POV 
Talk:Muhaxhir

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Albanian National Front Party

message: ::::Actually the articles must not merge. The Balist movement was a collaborationist reactionary organization which was working for the Axis cause. While the contemporary Balli Kombëtar in Albania is a right-orientated democratic party. Regards. --Revizionist (talk) 10:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 05:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Republican Party of Albania

message: Really no good RS quoted and would benefit from some. FeatherPluma (talk) 22:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Freedom Party of Albania

message: The party changed ideology and political position in the recent rebrand. I'm not sure to what ideology and position are now, but it would be nice to discuss it here. S.G ReDark (talk) 13:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology and Political Position 
Talk:Socialist Party of Albania

message: The Socialist Party of Albanian isn't a communist party.
After 1991, the legal successor of PPSH is Partia e Punes se shqiperise.
Modify the voice please-  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.84.163.112 (talk) 22:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albania 

message: This section is conversational and needs to be rewritten in an encyclopedic tone from reliable sources. Mackensen (talk) 02:32, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politicians 

message: There has been major vandalism of the page but I am not to sure on how to revert it. If someone else could so it I eouks be very thankful. Tankpiggy18 (talk) 19:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: If someone has reliable sources on the party’s use of the fist and rose emblem, do contribute to Fist and rose#Albania. Keriluamox (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fist and rose
Talk:Treaty of friendship

message: The term "Treaty of Friendship" is fairly generic name for a number of treaties sign over the course of history to signify close ties between two countries.  This article should be about the name as a phenominon and not any one treaty. Kevlar67 09:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been done Lollipoplollipoplollipop (talk) 13:39, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Talk:Unity for Human Rights Party

message: Please, do not mention unrecognized, irredentist regions in articles related to the Greek Minority in Albania. Knowledge is not political!--A B X T  •  ៛  04:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Northern Epirus
Talk:Icadyptes

message: The image currently on this page, :File:Icadyptes salasi00.jpg was uploaded by a user who was unsure of the copyright status.  The image was part of the following release from North Carolina State University:
*
My suspicion is that the material does not qualify as fair use, although I've never encountered fair-use with this sort of article, so I'm unsure and wanted to seek a second opinion.  Also, I wondered if perhaps the copyright status of images in NC State news releases is already established and I simply don't know.  Basically, wanted to double check before having an image that improves an article removed. --JayHenry 16:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright review
Talk:X (Xzibit song)

message: Can anyone post a description of the music video, cause the MV is very weird and i didn't really get what's happenin there... Football 7 11:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video 

message: How is a reference to Ike beating his first wife a "Diss on Ike Turner"? Removed this as it makes no sense and dozens of other rappers have used the same similie before, so it's not exactly noteworthy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.239.159.6 (talk) 10:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ike Turner
Talk:Iranian Tobacco Company

message: I tossed the db-spam template on here because it's pretty clearly an advertisement written by a PR department.  I wasn't certain whether marking it for deletion or simply putting an advert warning would be more appropriate, so maybe someone else would like to simply revert it to an earlier version or clean the article up, rather than deleting. --BMKane 11:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam warning
Talk:Gingerism

message: how do I insert sources in order to fufil Wikipedias verification procedures? Jayneyalice 12:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look here Wikipedia:Citing sources - you can use inline references or references at the end (depending on the specific nature of the references.  Acroterion(talk) 12:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Wang Leehom discography

message: The albums listed as 3rd & 4th Japanese albums are just releases of the chinese album into the Japanese market. I don't believe they count towards the Japanese discography.
121.208.180.227 12:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bandali Debs

message: :This article has been modified and protected due to concern over viewing of prejudicial evidence by jurors. It will be fully restored following resolution of pending cases. Persons who live in Australia, particularly New South Wales, should not edit the article or discuss it. User:Fred Bauder Talk 09:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like its all over, can things be restored now? 143.238.55.21 (talk) 09:37, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, needs some editing. Older references for earlier murders need to be added also. User:Fred Bauder Talk 14:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lourdes Hill College

message: I just declined page protection of this article, but indicating that students will be homeless because a private boarding schools is closing one of its boarding houses seems silly. Surely the school or the girls' parents will be funding alternative accomodation. In any case, I can't find any news sources on the closure, so without verifiability, my reading is that it can be challenged and removed.--chaser (talk) 00:05, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeless? 
Talk:Pine oil

message: In the article it says pine oil is a phenolic. Phenolic is aromatic acording to your link and pine oil is definately not an aromatic. It has one double bonds while aromatic ring has 6.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.142.112.34 (talk) 16:13, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Although pine oil is mostly hydrocarbons, it is a quite complex mixture.  It is plausible that there are natural phenolic terpenes (carvacrol for example) as components.  ChemNerd (talk) 14:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Phenolic

message: The article presently contains an infobox.  Some of the info in that infobox is probably incorrect.  
* The text indicates that pine oil is a mixture, not a single chemical species.  That's also what ChemNerd says.  The infobox indicates a single chemical species. 
* The infobox indicates that pine oil contains bromine (IUPAC name, formula, and PubChem reference).  Is that right?  Pine oil comes from trees that grow in diverse soils, I think.  Most soils are very low in bromine, which might be inconsistent with the composition given. 
* Given the above, I don't trust that the rest of the infobox is correct.
Would someone please check this and fix the article?  Oaklandguy (talk) 07:51, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox with chemical data: Some info looks wrong
Talk:William Fleming (governor)

message: This page from the National Governors Association gives very different birth and death dates, and says he was chief justice of Virginia after he would be dead by these dates. What is correct? Rigadoun  (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is correct. The National Governors' page makes the common error of confusing Virginia's two prominent William Flemings of the era -- the other is Judge William Fleming, who never served as governor. I'll make a note of it in the article. —Kevin Myers 03:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: (The National Governors' page has since been corrected.) —Kevin Myers 06:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference with National Governors Assn. page

message: Although I should have been handling other matters, I happened to notice some errors while in a library that had a small volume about this soldier and governor. I skimmed its beginning and end to flush out this article, and added some wikilinks. I don't have any time to check the family genealogy or describe his politics and contributions, much less find the bibliography citations. I write hoping others can fill in the obvious gaps.Jweaver28 (talk) 23:34, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  more work needed
Talk:Permas Jaya Bridge

message: I think the placemark on Google Earth is wrongly placed.
The current position of the placemark is at the Singapore-Malaysia Causeway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.111.213.40 (talk • contribs) 
:I've now changed the coordinates in this article to the location given for the Permas Jaya Bridge by Wikimapia, which appears consistent with the description in this article. -- The Anome 10:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-06-25/News and notes

message: I tried fixing the big Wikipedia PNG logo to correct the errors pointed out by the New York Times. Take a look at . Thue | talk 12:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The dot above the Omega is missing there. (It wasn't present at the NYT's image either.) --32X 01:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Les francs-juges

message: The lead describes this work as an "unfinished opera," but later the article indicates, "Berlioz threw himself into writing the score in the summer of 1826: the first two acts were finished by June, and he composed the third act in July and August and added the final touches in September," suggesting that it was in fact completed, albeit never performed and eventually destroyed. Which correctly characterizes the work? Drhoehl (talk) 21:50, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, it's categorised in :Category:Lost operas, but that is patently not so.  It's not as if the MS could be sitting on some dusty shelf in some unknown place - on the contrary, we know Berlioz destroyed it, so there's no MS to be found anymore.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 19:11, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unachieved or unfinished ? Please go to the talk page on the french article, we find in the correspondance of Berlioz, letters from 12 januar 1827 then 20 januar 1827, letters to Léon Compaignon then to his sister Nanci: « My opera is finished.» Vhere is the truth ? Excuse me for my English but it's for me a duty on English wiki to speak English ! Michel Verjus, FRANCE.--78.126.83.80 (talk) 12:26, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfinished? or Not?
Talk:Minik Wallace

message: I removed the POV banner, because I can't see where «This smells of POV», like anonymous 87.52.25.155 (that is: no talk page available and no possibility of discussing the topic via e-mail or any other means) states. I searched myself this subject, watched Axel Engstfeld's film, read the Danish version (which says the same but bears no non-neutral POV banner...), as well as the German one. Mr. 87.52.25.155 may —
#be not anonymous to allow discussion;
#be more explicit, giving at least some explanations about his own POV about this suspected non-neutral POV on the Talk Page;
#search by himself before suspecting those who searched and wrote to mistreat dishonestly the subject.
Іван Коренюк — Ivan Korenyuk 12:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi there...I don't mean to mess up anyone's hard work; I just thought this section needed to be expanded somewhat. If you see any factual errors (I tried to research everything!) or just plain hate my changes, feel free to rework them. And if I changed your stuff--I meant no offense. This just seemed like an area to which I could contribute. Thanks!Gladys J Cortez 07:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on Minik's father--notes
Talk:Christy Cabanne

message: There is no one with a last name of Cabanne on the United States Naval Academy Alumni listing. This listing is comprehensive (back to 1848) and lists all who have attended, non-graduates as well as graduates. Based on this I would say that the statement that Christy Cabanne graduated from, or even attended, the U.S. Naval Academy is not true and should be removed. Ray Trygstad (talk) 18:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Cabanne on Naval Academy Alumni list
Talk:St Margaret's Anglican Girls' School

message: I propose a merger of the daughter article of this page into this page, the article is;
* Eton Hall
Please leave comments below:
* Merge Article is about a non-notable school hall, which may deserve a mention in the main article not as an article in itself. Article also seems to be orphaned and therefore is unlikely to be expanded. Loopla 05:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger (September 2007)
Talk:Rainey Haynes

message: This artist passes WP:MUSIC (criterion #10) since her sons have appeared in major movies. I am removing the "notability" tag.
The article is definitely in need of cleanup, though.
Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 12:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability established