Talk:JavaFX

message: "on any browser that could run Java EE" - browsers do not usually run Java EE nor are they asked to do that. What does that statement mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osman-pasha (talk • contribs) 14:13, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Typos

message: No mention of JavaFX 3D though it's mentioned in at least one other Wikipedia article (Java3D development was suspended so they could concentrate on 3D for JavaFX or something to that effect). Is it vaporware? or does it exist?
72.234.110.47 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 07:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, here is an Oracle proposal on the OpenJDK mailing list : 3D Features Planned for Version 8. The planned API seems to be really rich. Version 8 means that they plan to have it available with Java 8, the next Java version, as future JavaFX versions will be integrated with JREs (it is already the case since the August release of Java 7). Hervegirod (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: JavaFX 3D?

message: The world does not consist of America only, - spring may be early in the year or late in the year depending on where you live.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.125.183 (talk) 06:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).  Sorry for the form response :)  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 14:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

text: You are right, but in some cases US companies themselves mention "Spring release"; In this case, I think that it's legitimate to keep the expression. I don't know if it's the case here though. Hervegirod (talk) 00:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: spring, and fall

message: JavaFX is NOT a scripting language:
:JavaFX is the platform, and JavaFX Script is the language.  At the time of writing, the latter is open source, while the former is not. In the quote, Larry is referring to two things: (1) JavaFX Script is not interpreted, like most scripting languages, and (2) it suffers from the Frankenstein phenomenon (people popularly refer to the monster as "Frankenstein", but that's not the monster's actual name). Just because some use the shorthand "JavaFX" in reference to "JavaFX Script", does not mean the articles should be merged (any more than the ActionScript article should be merged into Flash/Flex). JavaKid (talk) 19:09, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles should not be merged, as both subjects differ. Sae1962 (talk) 14:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  JavaFX Script merge JavaFX Article

message: For some reason when I visit this Wikipedia page in particular the style sheet is different from the rest of Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.155.52 (talk) 03:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre behavior 

message: “Technical highlights”?? SERIOUSLY?? Reads like a advertisement, rather than a article! This desperately needs fixing! — 88.77.157.152 (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's he same in a lot of other tech articles, for example .NET Framework has a Principal design features paragraph which has exactly the same problem, and is hardly sourced at all like this one. I agree that the two paragraphs are broken (and not the entire article), however what is broken is not the text IMO but the fact that it is not properly sourced, nor attributed to whom marketed it (in this case, maybe Sun or Oracle). Hervegirod (talk) 22:32, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an article, but ''advertisement''! 

message: I've just cut this from the lead:
:Attention: This article was written for the JavaFX 1.x series.  However, the new version of JavaFX from Oracle, 2.0, is so different from the 1.x series that the article needs a complete rewrite.  People interested in the technology should refer to the company's website while waiting for this page to be rewritten.
It's quite valid, but not encyclopaedic, and belongs here rather than in the article. -- Perey (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 

message: The external link to OpenFx is dead.
Is the project already defunct?  Compare this JavaFx live developer link:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/overview/index.html
quote:
"
JavaFX 2.0.2 is now available for download (December 12, 2011)
"
G. Robert Shiplett 14:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenFX link dead 

message: I think this article should go a bit more in depth. I would like to see a section like "Architecture". 
As a reader I would like to know:
* What does the overall architecture of JavaFX itself look like?
* What are the major components of JavaFX's architecture?
* What does the architecture of a programm using JavaFX look like?
* What distinguishes JavaFX from other types of Java Programms like applets and Java applications (with GUI Toolkits like AWT, Swing, SWT etc.) ?
* What distinguishes JavaFX from competing RIA techniques / products (like Flash, Silverlight AIR etc.) ?
* How does the deployment and updating process of JavaFX application work?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.226.185.203 (talk) 13:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture 

message: Given that JavaFX Mobile is now obsolete, should it be merged into this article?  I think so. Toddst1 (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree mainly due to size and lack of references, fundamentally it could have its own article per the different java editions but, just no. Widefox; talk 16:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[JavaFX Mobile]] to here 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on JavaFX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081217162601/http://blogs.sun.com:80/meetjeet/entry/javafx_the_road_ahead to http://blogs.sun.com/meetjeet/entry/javafx_the_road_ahead
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on JavaFX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121201211443/http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/overview/roadmap-1446331.html to http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/overview/roadmap-1446331.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.oracle.com/chrisoliver/entry/f3
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150105113138/http://download.java.net/jdk9/jfxdocs/javafx/scene/control/Dialog.html to http://download.java.net/jdk9/jfxdocs/javafx/scene/control/Dialog.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on JavaFX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121201211443/http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/overview/roadmap-1446331.html to http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/overview/roadmap-1446331.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I tried to edit a dead link for the following entry in the Bibliography section:
* Morris, Simon (November 23, 2009). JavaFX in Action. Manning. p. 375. ISBN 978-1-933988-99-3.
I was unable to do so because the new link I've found — https:// www. manning.com/books/javafx-in-action — is said to belong to a blacklisted domain name: manning.com 
Isn't that curious?
Then I checked the Wikimedia Global blacklist, and, another surprise: it has no mention of manning.com
P.S. and right now I am having a hard time creating this new section because of the said domain name Kirisakow (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography: unable to edit a dead link: manning.com domain name said to be blacklisted