Talk:IronPython

message: Someone should mention this.  They mentioned the work started on it here- []  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.136.130.208 (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  IronPython 3 Implementation 

message: My understanding is that IronPython is not attempting to be a complete Python implementation.  Can someone please further describe what IronPython really is other than just the whole python on dotnet rigamaroll?
:IronPython is definitely trying to be a complete Python implementation. Do you have any evidence to the contrary? Sanxiyn 07:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ironpython

message: See also Boo, a language for .NET and Mono based on Python, but has features borrowed from C# and Ruby such as static typing and anonymous closures.
it may give the impression nthat Ruby has static typing which AFAICT it doesn't --Nkour 13:27, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah. I agree. I was bold and changed it. - David Björklund (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  see also setence is bad 

message: The Simple Windows Forms application section is a how-to, and doesn't belong in an encyclopia article. 165.189.91.148 21:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple Windows Forms application 

message: Honestly, I don't understand most of the article. I think it should be improved. Only thing I take away is that everything is somewhat dynamic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.131.101 (talk) 03:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficult to read? 

message: Is there any reason why the language has got the prefix "Iron"? With Jython or JPython it's clear, but what is so "Iron" about .NET? Is there any official explanation of the name? If so, it should be mentioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.220.140.42 (talk) 12:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This would be interesting to know. It's probably just the name that they decided (Nython doesn't really click) and then IronRuby and IronScheme just followed along. MahangaTalk 23:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Iron"? 

message: I rewrote the loop in the code sample to use the more Pythonic list comprehension syntax. However, I am confused about that last line there; why is the list being stated on its own line? Not sure what to do with it. Rainault (talk) 17:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample code 

message: (Full disclosure - I work for Resolver Systems)
The referenced page "Differences Between Resolver One's Formula Language and Python Expressions" does not make the point that it was being cited to support.  Although Resolver One is written in IronPython, and is not compatible with CPython, the referenced page is not related to this.  Instead, it is description of a DSL used within the application, and in particular how that particular DSL differs from Python.  I was bold and removed the reference.
I don't think there is a page on the Resolver Systems website that explains how and why Resolver One is not CPython-compatible.  There probably should be!  I will put something here when there is - directly into the article if no-one objects.
--Gpjt (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrelated reference removed 

message: The following sentence in the introduction did not make sense as written, had no citation and seemed to be biased against the open source nature of the project "As the open source license of IronPython does not apply to parts of its documentation, including the comparison fact sheet, it is not clear of how these differences affect compatibility with the reference implementation of CPython.". I don't think such discussion was helpful in the introductory status - I left the statement that products developed on top of IronPython are not compatible with CPython, although that is hardly the point of IronPython (to leverage the .NET framework through Python). MichaelFoord (talk) 19:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Introductory Sentence 

message: The water is being muddied here without need. There are two main issues with compatibility language and libs
IronPython seeks to be 100% language compatible...
It's well integrated with the rest of the .NET Framework and makes all .NET libraries easily available to Python programmers, while maintaining compatibility with the Python language.
It intends to be language compatible, and integrate with the .NET libraries. There's not a lot of ambiguity here as it doesn't speak to Python libs. Python libs written in Python should run in IronPython and if they don't might be considered a bug as they should be able to rely upon Python compatability.
Python libs written in C (or whatever) as pyd extensions can not be expected to run out of the box as that would be a different compatibility issue extirely.
IronPython is a Python language implementation.
Applications written in Python may or may not be compatible with either IronPython or CPython (or JPython) depending on whether they use .NET specific features or C specific features (or Java specifc features).
Appplications written in Python may or may not be compatible with either *nix or Windows systems depending on whether they use Windows specific features or *nix specific features.
This is not a controversial area for a language to be in. There is no drama here. There are no tricky aspects that haven't been visited many times with other languages before. There is no divorcement from common sense.
Historically the Python community has already dealt with such issues over windows which are why there are windows specific parts of the Python libs. It is why there are python and pythonw versions of CPython.
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython
--Carnagh (talk) 12:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Issue of Compatibility

message: The list of Iron pyhton IDE could be place in the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments#IronPython instead  speak of some ide in this article . 
~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.142.0.11 (talk) 18:42, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is faster than CPython. Check yourself. Shootout reference runs IronPython on Mono, which is quite different from running IronPython on .NET. On the other hand, performance difference between Mono and .NET would be good to include. Sanxiyn (talk) 06:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

text: The referenced PyBench benchmark indicates mixed results.  Seems there are two areas where IronPython has performance deficiencies. First dictionaries - IronPython seems to be about 100 % slower on some of the dictionary stuff. Secondly, exception handling, IronPython seems to be faster when exceptions aren't raised. But raise an exception, and IronPython hits a brick wall - 50 x slower. IronPyton looks to be faster for a lot of things, though. In the end, your results will vary with your application mix. --Aflafla1 (talk) 21:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ironpython IDE 

message: Though it claims to be significantly faster than CPython, the references show it is only faster in a few cases, and slower in most others.Maybe "IronPython is generally slower than CPython, ..., but can be faster for some tasks" instead? 144.32.89.120 (talk) 16:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is faster than CPython. Check yourself. Shootout reference runs IronPython on Mono, which is quite different from running IronPython on .NET. On the other hand, performance difference between Mono and .NET would be good to include. Sanxiyn (talk) 06:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

text: The referenced PyBench benchmark indicates mixed results.  Seems there are two areas where IronPython has performance deficiencies. First dictionaries - IronPython seems to be about 100 % slower on some of the dictionary stuff. Secondly, exception handling, IronPython seems to be faster when exceptions aren't raised. But raise an exception, and IronPython hits a brick wall - 50 x slower. IronPyton looks to be faster for a lot of things, though. In the end, your results will vary with your application mix. --Aflafla1 (talk) 21:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on IronPython. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100223101738/http://www.ironpython.com:80/old.html to http://www.ironpython.com/old.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Kotz (talk) 12:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  v2.7.9 seems to be out there