lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:NSAKEY

message: Some sites mention a third key found, although this makes no reference to it. —porges(talk) 07:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What sites would those be? ➥the Epopt 14:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  for one —porges(talk) 02:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: Second reference "no backdoor in Windows" is dead. Rena Kunisaki (talk) 16:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: "doesn't make sense" 99.90.197.87 (talk) 13:24, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bobrayner sense 

message: Hi NSA. Ignore me, just a veteran that thinks y'all need to re-read the fourth amendment to the constitution.76.97.61.143 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is a NSA backdoor 

message: _NSAKEY lets the NSA silently run their code on your windows machine, after they've targeted you for some reason.  Unmentioned in this article, is MS_DRBG - their other 4 keys which give them a back-door into all the crypto operations you do on your windows machine (via PRNG manipulation - eg: generating keys, SSL/TLS sessions, etc) - which they can use to spy on everything you do in near-real-time. 120.151.160.158 (talk) 09:54, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources please? -- intgr [talk] 10:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/440.pdf says "MS DRBG has not, to our knowledge, been used in any real-world systems." The "MS" also does not stand for Microsoft, but instead "Micali-Schnorr". Artoria2e5 🌉 12:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about MS_DRBG? 

message: 173.216.105.18 keeps messing with the article, can an admin ban her?78.193.86.3 (talk) 02:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: They would need to be warned and then reported to WP:AIV. --allthefoxes (Talk)  02:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  173.216.105.18 

message: Hi, the significance of the PGP keys published is unexplained. What are they intended to be used for, not in general, but as in they relate to _NSAKEY? They seem irrelevant as the article is written now. 24.228.173.87 (talk) 23:29, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not include the actual keys into the article? Including them as PGP keys makes it possible to play around with them, and also why not  · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 07:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

text: It's useless besides "for fun and kicks". Maybe one day someone will factor the two RSA keys for fun and kicks. Artoria2e5 🌉 12:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  PGP keys relevance?
Talk:Sallekhana

message: : can you explain why you reverted the inclusion of categories :Category:Religion and suicide and :Category:Deaths by starvation ? jnestorius(talk) 14:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: . :Category:Deaths by starvation lists people who died of starvation so it is irrelevant. :Category:Religion and suicide is removed because equating Sallekhana with suicide is discussed at lenghth here:Talk:Sallekhana/Archive_1#Suicide. 1. Jain scriptures and followers of Jainism clearly differentiate between suicide and Sallekhana. 2. Indian judiciary has not pronounced its final judgement to consider it suicide. The issue is sub judice. In both ways, sallekhana is compared with suicide but not considered as suicide except by the activists who has litigated in courts. So placing it under :Category:Religion and suicide is like accepting it as suicide. The article is already placed in its parent category :Category:Religion and death which is OK. Hope this clarifies. Regards, :) -Nizil (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  List of people who died of starvation is a list, but :Category:Deaths by starvation is not a list, it is a category. Most of the articles are biographical articles (about people who died by starvation) but some are not. Deaths by Sallekhana are deaths by starvation. Placing Sallekhana under :Category:Religion and suicide does not imply that Sallekhana is a form of suicide; it implies that the article discusses religion and suicide. jnestorius(talk) 23:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 
Talk:Eye for an Eye (1996 film)

message: Doob lives in a dumpy hotel, not a flophouse.  A flophouse usually had large sleeping rooms with many bunks, possibly with partitions. As privately owned and operated lodging places, I'm not sure true flophouses are even allowed by law anymore.Pithecanthropus4152 (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flophouse?
Talk:Bound (1996 film)

message: Hi! How should we credit the Wachowskis? Please give us your input and help us decide. WanderingWanda (talk) 07:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a few days left on this RfC and opinions remain sharply divided. Have any insight into this issue or good conflict resolution skills? Your input could be very valuable.  WanderingWanda (talk) 05:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment - Crediting The Wachowskis
Talk:Cantor Arts Center

message: I have not attempted to address problems of organization here.  The name of the page is not the same as the bolded name in the first paragraph.  I have no idea myself how exhibits at Stanford are organized, named and credited.  I only had content to add.  David R. Ingham 07:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization
Talk:Celtic Pride

message: Previous versions of this article read "one of the worst movies/Boston movies ever made".
Recently it was edited to say "one of the best Boston sports movies ever made".
Someone was kind enough to flag it for verification.  But I don't think that's something that can be verified, and so I'm deleting the "Reception" section for the moment.
I will try to find, for example, its rotten tomatoes rating, so that the critical assessment is rendered in concrete, undeniable terms.Anonymoustom 21:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Best/worst
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Meathead

message: With all due respect, non-notable is a rather relative term.  If he actually exists, and there is a following for him, I don't see why the article should be deleted.  Personally, I have friends who are extreme NIN fans, and I have heard his name brought up in conversation, despite the fact that I am not on ETS nor a fan of NIN's music...
Were he the one-time author of an article which no one has ever read, or a user simply trying to promote himself, then I'd go for the deletion.  However, I don't agree with deleting the page simply because he is not famous enough; I thought wikipedia supported the free and equal dissimination of knowledge that anyone can edit or add to; yes, even NIN fans.--Mikeythetiger 07:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Brigantine, New Jersey

message: The island is a very shallow barrier island. we will see what happens there, after half the city stayed put during Hurricane Sandy .Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Purification

message: Should the l ist of chemical pu rification methods be moved to a separate page of "purification methods" leaving the curren t page p urely for disambiguation? susato 22:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (while I was cleaning  up this dab page per MoS:DAB). The list is now at List of purification me ods in chemis try. – sgeureka t•c 18:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Correction: List of purification methods in chemistry Seckends (talk) 07:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Newton

message: Robert Newton
We may need to change few things, according to imdb http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0628579/filmoseries#tt0047705 Newton made 26 episodes, he just finished before he died. Now, on amazon and everywhere else i found there are 13 shows,volume 1 and 2, like article says, but the link above, 26 shows, but ???, meaning something is very screwy. But that is 8 shows, i was only able to find 13. Another thing we should add, when he died he left his 5 year old child, there was a huge custody battle over him, finally he was left in care of his aunt and his half sister, of course, i do not have link for that, but i found some info via old newspapers, i can not copy pdf file here.  What's the code to create archives and a rectangle, so my talk appears in a square? -Boxingwear
:Hi Boxingwear, I am a fan of Newton but I don't know anything about him beyond what this article says. Anything you can add to the article would be great. Your post is fine, just need to sign it per the instructions using 4 tildes like "~~~~". Stbalbach 14:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To Robert Newton fans

message: I keep seeing black & white TV films on satellite TV of a series of Long John Silver starring Robert Newton. This is not mentioned in the article.  Streona (talk) 21:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: TV Series

message: Known for his hard drinking lifestyle, he was cited as a role model by the actor Oliver Reed and The Who drummer Keith Moon.
What is the connection between the 2 parts of the sentence?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 09:48, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Bizarre sentence in lede

message: Newton did not remain in Shaftesbury for long after his birth; his father was most often resident closer to London in Hertfordshire.  In 1911 census Algernon and Marjorie were recorded living in Northchurch, Herts, with their children Nigel (7), Robert (5), Pauline (4) and Ivy(2). 2600:1700:EA01:1090:6098:6CDB:E375:31A7 (talk) 03:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residence
Talk:Chains (Blackadder)

message: This statment is poorly written. Also, it doesn't make sense within the plot, because it appears that Ludwig returns disgused as the Queen after Blackadder chases him off the first time. I'm going to remove it. BethEnd 14:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "the true secret"
Talk:Russell Thorndike

message: Most of the information in this article appears in the Times Obituary, but we do need to provide better sourcing for some of this info.  I just undid an edit that claimed that Thorndike broke some sort of record for appearing in a bunch of performances in a very short time.  A nice piece of info, but it seems without context, and does not contain a citation.  I think what we really need here is someone from Britain with access to a library system to look up some articles on the man, since there is very little (if any) published literature on him.  Justinkrivers (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 08:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Leo Genn

message: Why does the article not mention that he was Jewish? (79.67.101.115 (talk) 19:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly because it's of no interest. Did his Jewishness affect his ability as an actor? -- SteveCrook (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Other articles for Jewish actors mention it. Given Genn's role in the Nuremburg Trials his ancestry is very relevant. (79.67.101.115 (talk) 11:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well add it then, nobody's stopping you. That's how Wikipedia works -- SteveCrook (talk) 12:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish 

message: Do you say  or ? Whichever it is, can somebody insert that? Kelisi (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this request. 207.35.33.162 (talk) 19:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: The copyright violations were introduced in the following diffs:
DuncanHill (talk) 13:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio revdel request
Talk:Need You Tonight

message: Should this article One of My Kind (Rogue Traders vs. INXS) be merged into this article? The main reason is because it is just a remix of "Need You Tonight" done by Rogue Traders,  but has been renamed to "One of My Kind". It uses the same lyrics and uses the same singer from INXS. FumblingTowardsEcstasy (talk) 04:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of My Kind 

message: mr bungle covered this song in their album 2A02:C7E:B65:7500:EC16:87C8:BCCE:DCCB (talk) 23:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  mr bungle
Talk:Max Adrian

message: Needs general expansion ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 07:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged comment

message: In notes: College Sinnners (triple n). LilHelpa (talk) 15:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Duly amended - thank you. Tim riley (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo?

message: We say that Laurier Lister became his "lifelong partner".  Yet we're not using any LGBT categories. Why is this?  Does "partner" here mean something other than personal partner? --  JackofOz (talk) 22:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not well found in the 'category' rules, but Max Adrian and Laurier Lister were a thoroughly established couple, and known as such throughout the theatrical profession. They didn't make a production number of it, and whether they'd expect to find themselves labelled 'LBGT' (is it?) one can only speculate. - Tim riley (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Max Adrian was distinctly more in the LGBT (there!) than in the G&S camp, so to speak. His one-man G&S show wasn't a big hit like his wonderful GBS show (which I saw forty years ago!) - Tim riley (talk) 17:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Thanks, folks.  I've added them now.  --  JackofOz (talk) 20:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT - just checking

message: conclusively proved to be born in Kilkenny, not Enniskillen, as were several of his brothers and sisters. RodCrosby (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: Adrian's musical numbers included... "Surly Girls" (as headmistress of St. Trinian's).
:Does this mean there was a stage version of the St. Trinian's stories? I can find no reference of this, and of course, in the films the part was always played by Alistair Sim. Valetude (talk) 16:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Trinian's? 

message: When and why did he change his name to Max Adrian? Valetude (talk) 23:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:John Laurie

message: Edit summary (Briefly describe the changes you have made) : Corrected note on John Laurie/Laurence Olivier Shakespeare films:  4, not 3.  Oliver, Son of Roland de Boys/Orlando, Son of Roland de Boys, respectively, in this film, of which I own the DVD {It's also been aired on Channel 20, WYCC-TV, PBS, in Chicago}.  CatRaptor 20:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can there be a brief mention of his catchphrase 'we're all doomed' in Dad's Army. Perhaps just a bracket of comma saying 'in which he was famous for the catchphrase 'we're all doomed'? C.Heward (talk) 13:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Doomed!

message: The picture of Bill Laurie from this article is from, predictably, Dad's Army. I understand that, but would Mr Laurie himself have been happy? No, he would not have been. Is any other picture available?Alanobrien (talk) 18:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: It says his wife survived him.  However previously it says she died 10 years earlier ..does anyone know? Wikimatical (talk) 16:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivor
Talk:HMAS Jervis Bay (GT 203)

message: Can anyone assist me with assistance to HMAS JERVIS BAY , Re-fit , abspestos removal in dry dock Cockatoo Island in 88-89
I served on her durring this period i remember the dock yard workers walking off due to abspestos .can anyone recall this..
any assistance appreciated `120.156.222.180 (talk) 13:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMAS JERVIS BAY RE-FIT COCKATOO DOCKYARD 1989
Talk:Renée Asherson

message: I've seen some sources say she was born Renée Ascherson and some say Dorothy Ascherson, so I just checked the birth index to make sure. From a search between 1910-1925, the only result was Dorothy R. Ascherson, birth registered in Kensington in 1915. So she wasn't born in Gerards Cross (it doesn't seem likely her birth would have been registered as far away as Kensington if she was) in 1920 as just about every other source claims. Crisso (talk) 09:20, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Info

message: It's not mentioned except briefly in the infobox.  We need more than that. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 03:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage to Donat
Talk:World Series television ratings

message: Can anyone try to include Canadian and international totals please.  For what its worth, can canadian and international ratings be included in all articles about TV ratings if someone can find them.--Nick Dillinger 08:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada and International

message: The reason I accessed this article was to investigate the ratings difference between the first half and second half of game 5 in 2008 which were separated by 2 days. I'm very interested in finding out if the national discussion over the suspended game generated more ratings for the conclusion of the game. I would like to see information in the table (or maybe a notation below) which shows ratings for the two separate nights as well as the aggregate rating. Thanks for past and future contributions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.244.152.152 (talk) 23:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 Game 5

message: The narrative says "The least watched World Series was in 2012, which was a four-game series that averaged a 7.6 rating and 12 share." If you look at the bar chart, you can see the bar for 2012 is clearly higher than 10. It looks like the bar chart is mislabeled and it's showing average share, not rating.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.20.5 (talk) 11:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart doesn't match the table below it or text above it 

message: For the 2011 World Series, the mathmatics indicate that it averaged a 9.9 rating. 8.7 + 8.9 + 6.6 + 9.2 + 8.8 + 12.7 + 14.7 = 69.6. Divide by 7, and you get 9.942. Even if you round off, you still get 9.9, so putting 10.0 is inaccuracy. 
Granted, TV by the Numbers said in October 2011, "[The] 2011 World Series on FOX averaged an 10.0/16 with 16.6 million viewers." (http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/10/29/world-series-game-7-averages-25-4-million-viewers-most-watched-world-series-game-since-2004/108958/)
However, this appears to be a round off, from 9.942 to 10.0, the cleaner, rounder number. The mathematics, again, indicate a 9.9 average, and Forbes.com (in October 2014) said, "the seven-game Indians-Marlins matchup in 1997 drew a 16.7 rating, compared to 9.9 for Cardinals-Rangers in 2011." 
I believe we need to use the accurate number (9.9) as opposed to the erroneously rounded off number (10.0).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.160.197 (talk) 02:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratings for the 2011 World Series

message: Sports Media Watch has figures going back to 1972 here, with ratings and viewers (no share figures). Thoughts on extending the table on the main page back that far? I'm willing to add the figures, if other editors believe it would be worthwhile. Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 02:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Additional data back to 1968 available via Wayback Machine - game-by-game and series averages (spreadsheet XLS files) Dmoore5556 (talk) 05:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

text: I'm going to start adding pre-1984 content to the table. Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older ratings
Talk:Røst

message: Was Pietro Querini actually Genoese? I knew he was from Venice.
--Suhardian 08:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We currently write
:
To verify this, we would need to compile a reference table of the average winter temperatures at all latitudes on Earth, but I suspect nobody has done this.  Even then, I would think that the winner would be the cold anomaly in Siberia, as cold spots are typically sharper and narrower than warm spots ... but I could be wrong.  Either way, could anyone think of a better way to word this sentence, or show me that it's fine the way it is?  Thanks, —Soap— 18:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate 

message: Clearly, the average yearly extremes should be more extreme than the average extremes by month. Instead, they look like averages of the latter. Elias (talk) 05:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average yearly extreme temperatures are flawed
Talk:Antoine Watteau

message: This article says that Cythera is the (mythical) birthplace of Venus. The article about Venus does not include this statement. The article about Aphrodite says that Cythera is the birthplace of Aphrodite. so does the article about Cythera. Should we change this article? --Etxrge 08:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Venus or Aphrodite

message: Ghirlandajo, in 1697, "at the request of Madame de Maintenon" (Schneider, see article's refs.), the commedia dell'arte players were expelled from France (or at least from its capital!) for their "salaciousness". Schneider shows an engraving after a lost painting by W. portraying their tearful departure. Had they also been expelled from Italy? Plausibly, but I have no references at hand. (In any case what does "Italy" mean? Before 1860, as you certainly know, there was no unified Italy, but a collection of separate states. Were they expelled from each of them?) Please explain reverts on talk page or summary. Nice work on the article, BTW. RodC 00:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are correct. The Cambridge Paperback Guide to Theatre, page 77: "In 1680 the Comedie-Italienne was founded, occupying the Hotel de Bourgogne as a permanent theatre. Expelled in 1697 after a scandal, the company reformed in 1716 - with 11 actors under Luigi Riccoboni." IIRC my source for Italy was the current Britannica article about Watteau. Will check it when I get home. If they indeed state that the players were expelled from Italy, there's a new entry for Wikipedia:Errors in the Encyclopædia Britannica that have been corrected in Wikipedia. Cheers, Ghirla -трёп- 14:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the Britannica also says the actors were expelled from France. Only my hasty reading is to blame. --Ghirla -трёп- 22:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pity. I was hoping for a new entry on that page! ;) Cheers. RodC 00:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expelling the ''commedia'' players
Talk:Claudia Poll

message: I eliminated the Doping section because it is not only irrelevant, but it is too long.  Whoever wrote it, (which of course did not sign their name!), probably had an agenda to discredit Claudia.
I also took out "former swimmer", because not only is she active, she just won 2 more gold medals in the LatinAmerican games.
Finally, the fact that the penalty was cut from 2 to 4 years is just a way for the FINA to not admit they made a mistake but at the same time not affecting her career significantly.  Also to this day Claudia defends her innocence.
Here is what I eliminated.  Move it somewhere else, to a special page on doping cases, or leave it here...but please don't put it back.
I also finally eliminated the extra categories, (Doping) and (German-Costaricans) because not only did they not exist but they're more useless categories that people insist on creating!!! And also if nobody has made the category, then how can somebody say this article belongs to it?? I see an agenda behind all this, and will not allow it on this page.  --Manuzel 08:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled