Talk:List of modern armoured fighting vehicles

message: APC "Talha" does not link to a vehicle, but a religious article. Karoschne 23:12, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
The entry for Talha APC is under APC-Talha.  Minor edit to T-90 -> T-90-II/MBT-2000. 
Adeptitus 00:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of modern armoured fighting vehicles

message: Australia has the Abrams M1A1 main battle tank.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.240.236.8 (talk) 14:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia has the Abrams M1A1 main battle tank 

message: According to the article on Wikipedia "To meet immediate needs in Afghanistan, twenty of the Bundeswehr's stock of Leopard 2A6 were upgraded to 2A6M standard and loaned to Canada at no cost by the German government. Two Leopard 2 Büffel armoured recovery vehicles were acquired at the same time. These vehicles were shipped from Germany to Afghanistan, with the first arriving on August 16, 2007.[5]
For the long term, Canada plans to replace the borrowed Leopard 2 tanks with a purchase of 100 surplus vehicles from the Netherlands, including 40 Leopard 2A6M for combat service, 40 Leopard 2A4 for training, and 20 support vehicles, such as armoured recovery vehicles, armoured bridge-laying vehicles and armoured engineering vehicles.
The older Leopard C2 tanks are considered to become completely obsolescent in 2015, but specific plans for them have not been announced.[6]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tercero (talk • contribs) 00:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be clarified, but I'm assuming it was meant to be a list of what vehicles have been produced in each country (as most countries have a note to that effect), and have been adding/removing listings appropriately.  There are plenty of other places where inventories are available, so if it's just another inventory page, then the page has no reason to exist. - Jonathon A H (talk) 07:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada Leopard 2A6 were upgraded to 2A6M main battle tank 

message: The correct name for the Swedish KP-bil is Terrängbil m/42.
However, I find that unsuitable as page-name for the English wiki since the letter 'ä' isn't present in the English alphabet and thus used the common name instead.BP OMowe (talk) 12:54, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name-problem. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of modern armoured fighting vehicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425053146/http://fact200.momp.gov.eg/Ar/MilProductDetials.aspx?pro=eTq3TITO3X8oqm+1Jf4cZe3eTiUZYy5jAqhxj6jOa+4= to http://fact200.momp.gov.eg/Ar/MilProductDetials.aspx?pro=eTq3TITO3X8oqm+1Jf4cZe3eTiUZYy5jAqhxj6jOa+4=
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130723063918/http://www.aoi.com.eg/aoiarab/aoi/kader/eng_new_page_6.html to http://www.aoi.com.eg/aoiarab/aoi/kader/eng_new_page_6.html
*Added  tag to http://www.morozov.com.ua/eng/body/oplot.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: * The section on Magach tanks has visual problems, may be a result of missing links or bad formatting.
* Merkava MK4M tank is called MK4 'Trophy', after the Trophy system, and not 'Windbreaker' (which is a literal translation).
* The Namer IFV, Namer CEV and Nemmera ARV are basically different configurations of the same AFV. Also the Nemmera is the nickname of the Namer CEV and not ARV.
* There is a missing link to Eitan AFV Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eitan_AFV)
* The Eitan AFV is not destined to replace the Namer by any means, only the M113. Many of the M113s are and will be further replaced by Namer IFVs.
I hope these mistakes will be fixed. Thanks in advance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galzi123 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies in the description of Israeli AFV and missing links 

message: In Zimbabwe 2 prototype vehicles are included (the bullet TCV and gazelle FRV). Should these be removed considering no other nation has prototype vehicles included and although the introduction includes used after the second world war they were only used for training or testing. Should they remain in this article? Tea4life (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prototype vehicles 

message: Under the definition of "modern" in the article "AFVs produced or used after the Second World War," the M24 Chaffee is listed but the M4 Sherman, M36 Jackson, and M26 Pershing aren't, though would be counted as modern. There are a lot of WW2 tank continued to be made or used after the war T-34, IS-2, T-44, IS-3, M3 & M5 Stuart, M8 Greyhound, Churchill, and so on. But under most of the sections it says "AFVs produced in" making the definition at the start of the article irrelevant. Also, South Africa the only one with a "Prototype tanks" tab.
The article differentiates between variants, as long as they were independently produced or upgraded, ex. Egypt & India, but why not list the AFVs that they have? A listing of what AFVs the nation is using wouldn't conflict with the definition presented in the article, and it could be organized into a section with tanks locally produced and tanks imported to the country Irobrna (talk) 05:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Inconsistencies