Talk:Nueva Planta decrees

message: The following sentences were recently removed, anonymously and without comment: "With these decrees, the court of the Kingdom of Castile became the court of Spain." "These acts were the first realization of Spain as a centralized state." Both of these statements seem perfectly accurate to me. What is the argument against saying this? Jmabel | Talk February 7, 2006
: Well, maybe that those are personal statements. Not all Historians think that, and it's not even taken as a fact. Oh, and it wasn't me. --80.103.138.223 02:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see no "personal" element in these. And what would be the alternate view? That Spain was somehow already centralized before this? That abolishing the fueros etc. was not an act of centralization? I really cannot imagine. - Jmabel | Talk 02:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Several days, no real explanation, restoring. - Jmabel | Talk 19:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  the capital of Spain (not only the Crown of Castile) was Madrid; the capital city of the kingdom of Castile was BURGOS city. Therefore, better you write "Crown of Castile" and not kingdom of Castile.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.231.81.87 (talk) 17:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed without comment

message: I have deleted: The repression in Valencia went so far that after burning the city of Xàtiva, Philip ordered that it would be rebuilt only under the name of San Felipe (the saint after whom Philip V had been named). In memory of the insult, the portrait of the monarch hangs upside down in the local museum of L'Almodí.  Since it doesn't belong here, but to the Kingdom of Valencia or Spanish Succession War articles. --80.103.138.223 02:34, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And the link provided is not a useful citation: it mentions nothing of the sort. - Jmabel | Talk 02:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Recently re-added and, again, incoherently. This is off-topic. I am removing it again. - Jmabel | Talk 19:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not belong here

message: On request, the Nueva Planta decrees' link has been added to the "Spain Close Up" template. Maurice27 21:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spain Close Up 

message: These decrees (NPD from now), did not finish with all the laws in Catalonia. On the contrary, many laws remained in force in both civil and penal rights. And many institutions in Catalonia kept living on. They lasted one century still, until the Cortes of Cadiz definately established upon Catalonia all the codes of the Spanish monarchy (not of Castile).
See the books "Historia de Catalunya" and "Historia de Espanya" by the great Catalan historian Ferrán Soldevila, for more details, specially the volume 5.
--77.231.81.87 (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  some details 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nueva Planta decrees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070526220415/http://www.mcu.es/archivos/lhe/Consultas/imagen.jsp?cod=003646&pos=1 to http://www.mcu.es/archivos/lhe/Consultas/imagen.jsp?cod=003646&pos=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified