Talk:IPod Nano/Archive 2

message: I have never seen a Nano like that. My friend got one in may and the screen was FLUSH with the front of the Nano. It should be removed until someone can vertify that the screen on new Nanos are indeed recessed.-Delta Spartan 22:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE- I just finished calling Apple. They say that the screen remains flush with the surface of the casing, so I'm removing the part that says that the screen is recessed. The iPod Mini's screen was slightly recessed, but not the Nano's.- Delta Spartan 20:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recessed Screen 

message: Can anybody tell me how to do that thing where you make the screen look like a checkerboard, or like a broken TV or something?  Some boy did it with my iPod nano and he won't show me how, but I almost did it.  Almost.  So I need someone to show me how to finish.  And other "geeky tricks" would be neat too. - Brazenbell - P.S. I hope I haven't offended anyone with the word "geek".  If I have, feel free to call me one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.45.195.111 (talk • contribs) 22:09, August 7, 2006  (UTC)
:Turns out that the kid didn't change the display at all.  I figured it out.  He just ran a test.  If anyone's interested, you reset the iPod nano (Menu+center) and then when the screen goes dark you hit Rewind+Center at the same time, hold, and let go when it beeps.  All sorts of tests will appear.  Use the Forward button to go down to Patterntest, hit Center, and then just keep on hitting Center.  Pretty colors and pictures will appear each time.  When it tells you to hit Menu, do so, and then go down to Reset.  In case you haven't guessed, you should now hit the Center button.  The iPod will reset.  Obviously.  That kid is going to die for making me figure all that out. - Brazenbell  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.195.111 (talk • contribs) 21:27, August 8, 2006
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu 16:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geeky Tricks 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support Edgecution 21:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) clearly states Lowercased trademarks with internal capitals do not need to be capitalized if the second letter is capitalized.  The trademark is "iPod nano".  The second letter is capitalised. AlistairMcMillan 00:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move. AlistairMcMillan 17:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving back

message: Why on earth is the article name still iPod Nano. The product is called iPod nano. The vote was an overall Support to move it back to nano instead of Nano. So...can we move it back please? — Wackymacs 06:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The move was proposed two days ago... discussions usually run for five days. AlistairMcMillan 20:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: I think that the iPod nano article can be a great GA, there are a lot of sources, it is written nicely, and the images are where they're supposed to be... I'll try to get a peer review... comments? — •The RSJ• (Main Hub - Rants) 22:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Good Article 

message: Could some one add some more information about the new red iPod nano? Possibly a picture too?JR98664 13:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product Red iPod 10/13/06 

message: Just a bit of info that I gained using my Nano. The protective sleeve naturally over time collects dirt , with the dirt in it when you put your iPod in the sleeve it really isn't any better off. I have also received word of at least one other account of this happening. If anyone else has ever noticed this, please comment so that this can be added as a valid bit of info. GTyron, 1:26, 11/26/06 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GTyron (talk • contribs) 19:26, November 26, 2006  (UTC)
:Don't all cases collect dirt and gunk naturally overtime? –-  kungming·2 (Talk) 21:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Got my 8 GB black nano five days ago as a birthday present, along with some protective sleeves. In just a few days, I have noticed that it does collect a lot of dust, and I haven't done anything more strenous than wear it in my (clean!) pants' pockets. Now, maybe it's just that I'm paying too much attention to it (it's so small! so new! so shiny! ;) I love my nano!), but I think user GTyron could be onto something here. Cheers! Raystorm 17:14, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

text: True. Just saying it could be worth researching. Raystorm 11:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah.  If only we didn't have rules against original research. AlistairMcMillan 12:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protective sleeve 

message: This section smells like pork luncheon meat to me.
"Nike+iPod, released May 23, 2006, is one of the many accessories" - so why do we need 84 words about it and none about any of the many other accessories? Instead maybe we could have a section "Accessories" mentioning some of them - including the Nike thing if needs be.
--John Stumbles 01:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nike+iPod