Talk:World Institute of Scientology Enterprises

message: I have removed a section suggesting that the Mission: Renaissance art school is a Scientology front. As editors in this area well know, it is imperative with Scientology topics that our sourcing be absolutely rock-solid and that WP:NPOV be followed scrupulously. Sourcing an accusation like this to a blog just isn't thorough enough. I invite editors in this area to please better nail this one down. Phil Sandifer 18:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you research the WISE directories, you will see that Mission:Rennaisance is indeed a Scientology WISE organization.  Since it is also appears to be a sucesfull business, perhaps calling it a "front" is not accurate.  Did not find any additional confirmation that there is recruiting pressure through Mission:Renaisance, though there are researched articles on other WISE organizations putting pressure on employees to attend Scientology training programs. LA Times: Converting the Business World (Sterling Management Systems).  Perhaps somebody with more free time than I can research this further.  Gallup 23:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't doubt you in principle, but still - a more reliable source is going to have to be found for this. We can't go making accusations about people on the basis of blogs. Phil Sandifer 05:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Point of fact; being a "Scientology WISE organization" simply means that the owner(s) of the firm have embraced Hubbard's administrative ideas such as Management by statisitics and the Org board and have agreed by abide by a certain Code of Ethics which includes arbitration by a WISE mediator of any disputes with another WISE member. That is the basic company membership. Now if the firm also wants to train its employees in the Hubbard administrative technology using WISE materials then they become a higher-level member. It is this formal training that some object to but most WISE members to not provide the formal training. --Justanother 10:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, some do (Hey, isn't an e-meter a religious artifact?) AndroidCat 21:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed section

message: See Sterling Management Systems, talk page. Shutterbug 03:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  gormez et al 

message: I thought external reference links were supposed to be in the references section - linking to other non-biased WIKI pages.  What I see here is an attempt to trick people into following content links to reference pages.  This seems unfair to other WIKI pages that obviously cannot put external links into the content of the article (otherwise, there would be external links all over WIKI).
Naglma 19:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! Be bold next time and just change it! No need to ask on talk page for such uncontroversial changes.  Unfortunatly there are external links in the body of articles "all over WIKI" wich want to be moved to the appropriate section ;). -- Stan  talk 19:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External reference links??? 

message: I just NEED to comment on something that I find infinitely amusing. I just read the Scientology arbitration case and how these pages are being monitored for substantial modification etc. Then I went here to read the pages. Now, I just edited this page to remove a space character that was added to the beginning of a paragraph. Not a substantial edit by any stretch. But it turns out that the wiki markup makes paragraphs that start with spaces be unformatted i.e. the text doesn't wrap. This made the paragraph difficult to read, especially the last part where there are some negative facts about the subject of the article. Human creativity and willpower truly have no boundaries!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.90.252 (talk) 17:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'space character' spam 

message: Just an observation. --Mknjbhvgcf (talk) 20:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The whole 'History' section seems to be without even one source 

message: Why are there so many dentists mentioned in courts section. Is scientology so common among dentists in USA? 217.30.64.206 (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dentists