Talk:IEEE 1394

message: "FireWire is capable of safely operating critical systems due to the way multiple devices interact with the bus and how the bus allocates bandwidth to the devices"
This is unsupported by a reference and the rest of the paragraph implies that the standard is used for aircraft controls by linking the ability for isochronous communications in IEEE 1394 with the general use of isochronous communications in aircraft systems.
Now, I have no idea whether aircraft use 1394 to perform these types of communications, but the article does not cite a suitable reference to support this. 
194.74.130.171 (talk) 12:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible original research 

message: The article claims that IEEE 1394 is the successor to Parallel SCSI. It is not. SAS and SATA are the successors, especially in the largest-volume markets for storage devices: those of desktop PCs and servers (which also use FC). The claim might be true in the Apple universe, where Apple just had to make it the successor. It will be difficult to find market share (of actual satellite devices) in numbers and currency after such a long time. The numbers for computers with IEEE 1394 ports cannot reflect actual usage, so numbers for devices with only IEEE 1394 will be most useful. For now, I have only inserted notes on missing sources. I also have to provide some for my claims. ;-) --92.211.192.188 (talk) 01:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superceding SCSI - NOT 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on IEEE 1394. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415064551/http://bio.research.ucsc.edu/people/feldheim/MouseEyeTracker/NI-IMAQ%203.1.3/patents.txt to http://bio.research.ucsc.edu/people/feldheim/MouseEyeTracker/NI-IMAQ%203.1.3/patents.txt
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111104134827/http://www.1394ta.org/about/Bylaws.html to http://www.1394ta.org/about/Bylaws.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517132445/http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/005f921e-f706-401e-abb5-eec42ea0a03e1033.mspx to http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/005f921e-f706-401e-abb5-eec42ea0a03e1033.mspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080430041438/http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/37f23bde-283a-4341-9a8a-ca6eb86ac8a41033.mspx to http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/37f23bde-283a-4341-9a8a-ca6eb86ac8a41033.mspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511195551/http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/20184cb6-7038-4e82-a32c-4bc10ffe56ab1033.mspx to http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/20184cb6-7038-4e82-a32c-4bc10ffe56ab1033.mspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100129032343/http://www.hanaalliance.org/docs/whitepaper121405.php to http://www.hanaalliance.org/docs/whitepaper121405.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've got a picture of a 1394b cable with 9 pins. I don't see a good place for it in the document, should I include it somewhere? If so, where? McKay (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks a lot like the picture on the right , except there's 9 holes in the center block.McKay (talk) 21:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

text: That's the same connector. The holes are just exposed contact spring holes, the contacts themselves are on top of and below the center block. --Zac67 (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  9-pin cable 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved   Calidum 16:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: IEEE 1394 →  – Is the name Firewire not commonly used outside of Apple spheres? Is the numerical identifier that much more widespread in common use? —151.132.206.250 (talk) 18:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

text: FWIW here's the ngram. ~Kvng (talk) 15:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Afraid the linked Ngram search only covers lowercase. Here's a corrected link. FireWire appears approximately four times more frequently than the IEEE designation throughout the corpus, and i.LINK barely at all. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 00:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Computing has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 07:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 March 2022