lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pouilly-Fumé

message: The official site shows that the name is not hyphenated: . So shouldn't the hyphen be removed here? Martinevans123 (talk) 19:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally have no preference and have seen it both ways. The German Wikipedia doesn't hyphenate while the French Wikipedia does. The Sotheby's Wine Encyclopedia doesn't hyphenate while The World Atlas of Wine and The Oxford Companion to Wine does, etc. I don't think there is an overwhelmingly compelling argument for either side but you might as well post an WP:RM for it since a move would require an admin bit anyway since Pouilly Fumé already redirects here. See what consensus turns up. AgneCheese/Wine 03:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'm not sure either. These three are all hyphenated (at the moment): Pouilly-Fuissé, Pouilly-Loché and Pouilly-Vinzelles. But had assumed that that was because they were all place-names, whereas Fumé was not. But if French wiki has it then.... Martinevans123 (talk) 08:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good point regarding place names and you usually do see those villages always hyphenated. Still, I don't think there is any harm in posting an RM with a low risk of this becoming "contentious". I'm sure you're not the first reader to raise an eyebrow at seeing Pouilly-Fumé hyphenated and it probably would be helpful to have a consensus driven discussion on the topic with outside views introduced. AgneCheese/Wine 18:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that Merriam-Webster gives a hyphen, as does dictionary.com. I'd be willing to do an extensive label survey, of course, if WMF was willing to fund the purchase of the required bottles. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphen
Talk:Kut

message: Does anyone know when this city was founded, and by whom?  24.211.52.221 (talk) 05:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History lacking 
Talk:Bibi Khanoom Astarabadi

message: In the interest of civility, I have opened this discussion to try and find consensus on a number of issues that seem to be facing this article. They are in regards to the following:
*This book is considered by some as the first declaration of women's rights in the recent history of Iran. What verifiable source substantiates this?
*This clearly testifies to Bibi Khatoon's wholehearted dedication to the cause of women's education in Iran. Whether it did or didn't, that seems to be the editor's opinion.
*True to her usual style of writing, Bibi Khatoon's tone in this book is derisive. Again, the editor's opinion.
As far as the footnotes go - a lot of them aren't proper sources. This one, for example, is even an example of a footnote that is OR:
*18. The present writer has consulted neither Ta'deeb al-Nesvan nor Ma'ayeb al-Rejal. Some familiarity with this genre of the literature of the time suggests however that Ta'deeb al-Nesvan may not have been more than a prank by a member of Iran's aristocracy of the time.
Does anyone have an opinion on this? I won't restore the tags until this is discussed, or unless there isn't any meaningful discussion on the topic.
Sidatio 14:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent tagging of article
Talk:Countess Claudine Rhédey de Kis-Rhéde

message: Shouldn't the article be called Countess Claudine Rhédey von Kis-Rhéde so as to include her title before marriage? I'll move it in a few days if no one objects. Ruby2010 (talk) 05:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Moving it now. Ruby2010 (talk) 17:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countess? 

message: The line of descent from Vlad II to Prince Charles through Vlad The Monk (Vlad the Impaler's half-brother):
Vlad II ---> Vlad the Monk ---> Radu IV ---> Mircea III ---> Stanca Basarab ---> Zamphira Logo de Szazsebes ---> Adam Racz de Galgo ---> Peter Racz de Galgo ---> Christina Racz de Galgo ---> Catherine Kuun de Osdola ---> Baroness Agnes Kendeffy de Malmoviz ---> Baron Gregor Inczedy von Nagy-Varad ---> Baroness Agnes von Nagy-Varad ---> Countess Claudine Rhedey von Kis-Rhede  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.117.186.131 (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So what?  There are two problems witht he inclusion of this.  First, the source being cited for this information is not a reliable source - it shows descent from ancient trans-Atlantic travelers, the Emperor of America, and Atlantis - it cannot be trusted for anything; and second, an uncle 12 generations back, is just indiscriminate information.  I can also find you a source that will give her a line from Ghengis Khan, but it also isn't trustworthy, and it also is too many generations to be worth mentioning. Agricolae (talk) 09:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this isn't reliably sourced and should not be in the article. Dougweller (talk) 10:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vlad the Monk 

message: A recent change to this article involved this sentence:  "The most notable ancestor of the Aba noble house was Samuel Aba, the third king of Hungary between 1041 and 1044, married to a sister of St. Stephen I, the first Roman Catholic king of Hungary," by inserting "(or Eastern Orthodox depending on view from the Great Schism of 1054)" after Roman Catholic. I'm a bit new to this area of history, so I'm wondering how this can be when Stephen I died in 1038. Can someone please explain? Thanks. History Lunatic (talk) 06:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern Orthodox?
Talk:Mughal rule in Himachal Pradesh

message: ::This article does not give any information about Mughal rule?? I wonder about its rating!--रघुबीर सिंह (talk) 16:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Bob Blyth

message: As far as I remember Bob Blyth was Bill Shankly's uncle and my great uncle. As brother of Barbara Blyth (Bill's mother), his nationality was Scottish.  I will attempt to find his birth date and pass on the information.
Blyth A Mitchell  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.76.244 (talk • contribs)  18:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family
Talk:Clemens August Droste zu Vischering

message: I made an NPOV correction - the paragraph about "slanderous" accusations and "true state of affairs" was apparently taken from a Roman Catholic encyclopaedia and presented a specifically R.C. view of what was a complicated conflict between Roman Catholicism and the Prussian state. While I sympathize with the state my concern here was NPOV. I hope my correction is not controversial. I do understand people have a lot of work to do so copying text from the encyclopaedia was a good way to handle the biography in a resource-effective way; it's a simple edit and not an invitation to conflict. Ramendik (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV correction 
Talk:Boleslaw of Sweden

message: "Boleslas Sverkerson" or "Boleslaus Sverkerson" (both are listed at the top of the article) are poor translations of the Swedish name, "Burislev Sverkersson". The articles that reference this article use "Burislev". I suggest we change the name of the article to "Burislev Sverkersson". Facts707 (talk) 07:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose - established English-language exonyms should be used for the pre-20th century names of all royalty. SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  name: should be "Burislev Sverkersson"
Talk:Brian Brendan Wright

message: Are there any secondary sources to support his nickname? Per Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, that means sources that have been published in newspapers, biographies, magazines, scholarly journals, etc. —C.Fred (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 
Talk:Clement Mansfield Ingleby

message: I'm rather confused as to why someone put on the tag that this article lacks information on his importance.  He was in the Nuttall Encyclopedia, his book is at Project Gutenberg, and The National Archives of the United Kingdom has material on him.  What more do you want?   Fanra 09:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:Buck English

message: The section "After Jail Time" begins with his release from San Quentin, but there is nothing about how he got there.  What was he imprisoned for, and for how long? RJFJR 03:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eponychium

message: These articles are still little more than stubs, and I would advocate respecting their rights to separate existence and allowing them to evolve. Eponychium could well develop further, in which case reference to Eponychium in Cuticle could be reduced to a link. However, I suspect the majority of readers will arrive at eponychium from cuticle, rather than the other way round, and it is therefore important not to reduce cuticle too far. There is much more to cuticle than just eponychium, and merger will have a negative effect on access to those various topics. Cuticle's chief role is to remain as an index to a number of disparate articles on different types of cuticles. 
Plantsurfer 09:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with a merge as well.  I came to cuticle for info on cuticles, not on the whole thing. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with you. I came to Cuticle for info on plant cuticles. It is a Very Bad Thing to "hide" a short but quality (sources!) article inside a more than crappy stub. Plant cuticle is so far more important and will always be smore important than this stub, entire monographs have been published about it. What can be said about the eponychum? Has so much as a single chapter in a science textbook ever been published about it? A proper disambiguation page is needed here, not a merge. This disambiguation page should be cuticle, to which cuticula should redirect. That way, precision is achieved with minimal fuss. Dysmorodrepanis 13:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Not expanded, but turned into a disambiguation. "Cuticula" means simply "small/thin skin". Dysmorodrepanis 13:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: I removed the section on animal hooves, because the whole section appeared to be quoted from the cited source. That violates the source's copyright. The article should talk about the use of the term in veterinary medicine, but we need to do this in our own words, citing sources as appropriate.--Srleffler (talk) 02:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hooves
Talk:Clementina Maude, Viscountess Hawarden

message: Reference 5 returns a 404. TerryToogood (talk) 00:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Variously 1864 or 1865. Citation to confirm required
Kaybeesquared (talk) 16:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Casper Holstein

message: What actually happened was that Casper Holstein was kidnapped by a team working for a Dutch Schultz lieutenant named Sholem Bernstein who had owed Schultz money. Holstein claimed to have managed to avoid paying a ransom to either Bernstein or Dutch Schultz. As both men Casper Holstein and Schultz were paying off Tammany Hall he apparently paid Tammany Hall and arranged with leadership that the money was credited to Schultz. RichardBond (talk) 11:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kidnapping
Talk:Catherine Barton

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 07:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: In this article, Charles Montague's name is spelled that way, with an 'e' although in his own article it is spelled 'Montagu'. I would guess the latter is the more widely accepted form but I presume there are people more knowledgeable on this than me who can make the change - if appropriate - more authoritatively than I could. 221.243.91.229 (talk) 01:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Montagu(e)
Talk:Charles Bellamy

message: ... forced to flee to the safe havens of Madagascar of the Gulf of Guinea? What's that supposed to mean? Could that be an or? But then it would be rather vague... --WernR (talk) 07:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't know much about geography... 
Talk:Paul Wolfskehl

message: This article is written as a story and lacks the format of an enciclopedic article, besides not having any sources except for some random facts at the end. Federicoaolivieri (talk) 07:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Format and lack of sources

message: Most of the article seems to be copyvio from here. (Though it says to be written for an Open University, so maybe its free content?) --Tgr 09:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As per , Wiles received the prize on 27 june. --Roberto.zanasi 10:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct date of attribution 

message: As Petr Beckmann points out, Germany's hyperinflation reduced a hundred thousand  marks to less than a penny; the Prize must have been refunded after 1924. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Amount

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ams.org/notices/199710/barner.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 12:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Eli Lilly

message: This 2009 FA has considerable source-to-text issues and should have a Featured article review as soon as possible.  I note that concerns have been raised in the past:
# DePauw alumni?
# First pharmaceutical company of its kind?
# Fraudulent lineages
Of more recent concern, in a brief spotcheck of sources, I found NONE of those I checked were verified, and suggest that a top-to-bottom re-examination should be undertaken here, along with an urgent Featured article review. As some of these were present in the version that passed FAC, this does not seem to be a matter of changes since the FAC, rather original error. Samples:
# This version of Madison is the same as the once cited when the FAC was passed, and still today.  When the FAC was passed, the article said "In 1890, Lilly founded the Commercial Club and was elected as its first president"; the article still says that. The source only says he was the driving force behind organizing the Club ... nothing about first president that I can find. 
# None of the text cited to Madison page 5 is verified by Madison:  and  and none of the text about his son Josiah is found on page 5 of Madison. 
# Also from Madisonpage 1 of Madison re "crack battery" what is in this article not only seems to have the wrong person, there is nothing about his classmates, etc.
# There are basic errors about various battles:  Second Chattanooga August (not September) 1863 and was not an important battle. 
I continued checking sources and found considerable issues of concern everywhere I checked: a top-to-bottom examination at FAR is in order. SandyGeorgia (Talk)  18:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done some minor corrections to fix the issues regarding Second Chattanooga, but I don't have time to dig deeper right now. Hog Farm  Talk 23:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured article review needed: considerable source-to-text issues
Talk:Constance Naden

message: The article had a previous and uncited statement that Naden was "buried at Key Hill Cemetery, Hockley, Birmingham (Section P, Grave No 460), but sadly no headstone survives."
I have found 2 sources, though, that state that she was buried at a cemetery on Warstone Lane, Birmingham. It bother's me, though, that the Kill Hill Cemetery statement has a specific location. In any event, I'm not finding any sources that states that she was buried at King Hill and/or Hockley.
I'm guessing that this may be another Constance Naden, but since there is specific information I put it here just to ensure I'm not missing anything.--CaroleHenson (talk) 13:06, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it - adding this info as a footnote.--CaroleHenson (talk) 14:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, never mind - it looks like the info (page 12) came from the Wikipedia article.--CaroleHenson (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial place 
Talk:Charlie Athersmith

message: I have been trying to pin down the match in question, and I can't. Athersmith never scored in a senior match against Sheffield United. If the tale is correct, it must have been a friendly or a game in one of the minor competitions (eg, Staffordshire Senior Cup etc). In 1901 Villa played League games against Sheff United on 30 March (0-0) and 16 September (1-2, with Villa's goal scored by Albert Wilkes). They also played two FA Cup games, Garraty and Devey scoring for Villa - Athersmith did not score, umbrella or not. (Source: Aston Villa, A Complete Record, and also, The Aston Villa Chronicles by John Lerwill.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:3266:6300:2872:4CBD:3916:B581 (talk) 20:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The umbrella incident happened, but it wasn't 1901, it was November 1894 (5–0 at Perry Barr). Don't know who was officially credited with the goals, your books will tell you: judging from contemporary reports, the weather conditions were so bad that I doubt anyone could reliably identify the scorers. Wasn't really a funny story: the Villa players, being at home, had a half-time change of kit available, but the visitors didn't, and by the end of the match several had gone off with exposure/frostbite. I'll clean it up a bit and add a couple of sources, but it probably won't be till after the weekend. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 21:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The umbrella legend
Talk:Charlie Dove

message: If anyone can find a decent rebuttal for this, it should definitely be added. The story is most probably nonsense and originates from Brian Belton, the supposed descendant. Given that it's part of West Ham "folklaw", I probably wouldn't get rid of it completely, but it certainly needs a large truckload of salt heaped onto it! Nzd (talk) 21:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belton story
Talk:Constantin von Alvensleben

message: "questionable judgement"?? The Britannica article cited says no such thing. It rates him throughout both the 1866 war with Austria and the 1870-71 war with France as "a fighting General of the very first rank". In particular Von Alvensleven's III Corps @ Vionville/Mars-la-Tour on 16 August 1870, though heavily out-gunned and out-numbered, took on and defeated most of Bazaine's Army of the Rhine, and blocked its escape from Metz. Where, 10 weeks later, it surrendered.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.214.243.244 (talk) 09:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Joseph Kervyn de Lettenhove

message: I have moved this page from the former title, "Constantine Bruno, Baron Kervyn de Lettenhove" to "Joseph Kervyn de Lettenhove", by far the most common name, and the name used for this article in most other wiki-languages as well. It seems that "Constantine-Bruno" was incorrectly used by some old Britannica versions, and by not a single other source. "Constantin-Bruno" would have been slightly more correct, but he is overwhelmingly referred to as "Joseph Kervyn de Lettenhove", so per WP:COMMONNAME, that's where I moved it. Fram (talk) 12:31, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved
Talk:Constantine, Hereditary Prince of Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 02:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Constantine, Prince of Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg →  – Subject never assumed the title of "Prince of Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg". When he died, his father was still alive, and therefore he died as the "Hereditary Prince of Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg". M. Armando (talk) 15:14, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 July 2023
Talk:Christopher Layton

message: Apparently, Layton had 10 wives and 65 children.
http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=arrington_stwriting
sadly, the fact does not have a directly cited source, but in theory the bibliography could hold water.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.117.24.148 (talk) 04:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cornelia Adele Strong Fassett

message: In effect, this article is about The Florida Case Before the Electoral Commission, rather than biographical about the artist. It would make good sense, in my view, to create a separate article on the painting and, instead, broaden out Cornelia Adele Strong Fassett to mention her other notable works. Sionk (talk) 10:25, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for Electoral Commission painting?
Talk:Claudio Veggio

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it could use a full works list, perhaps an additional source (Reese?), and inline citations.  My review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 15:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Cornelius Krieghoff

message: who posted the Page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.230.60 (talk) 15:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the section of Cornelius Krieghoff I noticed in the side bar it said he died on April 8, 1872, when in the text it said he died March 8, 1872. Just thought I'd point that out, i have to write an essay and the correct information would be much appreciated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.78.190.250 (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error i coincidentally found. 

message: How could a man who lived from 1815 to 1872 have been photographed by a photographer (M. O. Hammond) who lived from 1876 – 1934?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.197.128 (talk) 01:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error
Talk:Cornelius Van Alen Van Dyck

message: Modern scholars give more credit for this renaissance to the Egyptian government and to some of Van Dyck's Arab collaborators, but he published more than twenty Arabic textbooks, and his translation of the Bible was used by Arabic-speaking ...
What Scholars, Israel Shamir, Ali Abounimah, Houssein Ibish or any similar blogger?.
Only in U.S.A. and arab countries, bloggers are considerated as experts and scholars.
Every true Arab Scholar from every sect recognizes contributions to culture by Van Dyck, period.  Only takfiris extremists can denies his contributions to arab culture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.39.120.21 (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scholars or Bloggers 