lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fashion journalism

message: Fashion public relations should either be deleted or merged into this article. Pdcook (talk) 17:15, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I might agree with you if you can provide independent references that comply with WP:reliable sources. Also, please check out WP:5 pillars for more information about Wikipedia. Thanks, Pdcook (talk) 18:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been deleted due to copyright infringement. Pdcook (talk) 16:35, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Fashion public relations]] into this article 

message: As it stands, that section is pretty useless. However, I'm reluctant to remove it completely. With a bit of knowledge, it could be helpful to write a short summary about fashion blogging (with link to main article). Or alternatively, how fashion publications are adapting online via the use of apps and digital mags. Both would be great, I suppose. 
I would do this myself, but I don't really have the expertise to do it all completely. Anyone have suggestions? Lauren9360 (talk) 10:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fashion and the Internet 

message: * That article's subject is a complete subset of this one.
* As it exists, it is comprised almost solely of material cannibalized from other articles combined with insipid high school essay-isms.
* It therefore offers absolutely nothing that this article can't while also being extremely clunky and unfocused to a point of near-uselessness.
* I will be making sure worth saving is merged.
* Modern fashion journalism will become a redirect.
TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 11:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Modern fashion journalism]] 

message: Images
* Bambi Magazine Issue X Cover.jpg
Sources
* [currently blank]
Excerpts
* [currently blank]
Topics
* Fashion blogging and vlogging
* People: Carmel Snow, Grace Mirabella, Franca Sozzani, Suzy Menkes, Anna Wintour (descriptions of these in the source article as well as the section heading are essentially unusable due to extremely unencyclopedic prose)
TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 11:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To be merged
Talk:Tailrank.com

message: I placed the  tag on the article when it was at this stage. At that point, the article had made no claim of notability to meet WP:WEB and had provided no links except for Tailrank.com.
Since then, the article has been expanded to include external links that discuss the topic. These may or may not meet the criteria of the notability guideline, but it's certainly a step in the right direction. Creating a "media attention" section, cited (WP:CITE) nicely, would definitely help. -- Scientizzle 19:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the followup and the formatting/style improvements. I understand the motivation if you thought I was just trying to override a proper deletion. Congratulations on instilling a sense of ownership in me to improve the page! I'll try to provide some history once I know more about it myself. --OtisTDog 19:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag
Talk:Caspian (band)

message: As this article has been deleted 6 times now, I've taken the liberty of protecting it against recreation for the time being.  If you feel this band meets the guideline criteria for inclusion of a musical act article feel free to contact me or follow the links on the main page.--Isotope23 17:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:SALT]]

message: Per a conversation with :
* It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.(et cetera, et cetera)
I have also found that it fulfilled the following criteria that make it very likely that sufficient reliable information is available.
* Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country, reported in reliable sources. - Caspian has participated in two tours of USA of 20 shows or more and is currently on another and this has been reported
It needs to be expanded along WP:ATT lines as opposed to the unsourced band bio stuff that previously existed here.   has offered to fix the article up with the sources.--Isotope23 16:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: unsalted

message: I just unsalted this a few hours ago... take a look at the links above; this meets WP:MUSIC or at least asserts enough that this isn't a speedy.  Since I "created" this article (or more accurately  resurrected a stub) I'm not going to wipe out the tag... I'll leave it for someone else.--Isotope23 00:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With the links posted, I think there's enough to assert notability. I removed my speedy tag. Realkyhick 01:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy

message: I added a history section to the article, with references. Any issue? Mwhale 04:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, looks good.--Isotope23 14:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated

message: I've moved the inappropriate external links here for the time being per WP:EL. Feel free to incorporate them back into the article as references. Opencooper (talk) 06:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved external links 
Talk:Jining–Tongliao railway

message: This railway was the last railway using steam locomotives. I will supply more information if I have time. Sinolonghai 17:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you don't want anyone else to add to it in the meantime, might I suggest you add an 'under construction' template? Sarc37 17:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

text: The claim to be the last steam railway in the world is very far fetched, as I know of many many others. Possibly, it is the last major steam railway line, but not the last by itself. There are many smaller railways operating on steam and I'm sure many other developing countries still use steam as well. Poeloq 17:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was indeed the last main steam line in the world, I will rewrite the article slightly to make this clearer. Poeloq 18:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Trains February 2007 does explicitly call it "the end of mainline steam in China". --NE2 17:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

message: I would really hate to see this article go and therefor hope this article will not be deleted. It would be great if Sinolonghai could add some more information in due time! Poeloq 17:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion
Talk:Tom Jones

message: *Should redirect to Tom Jones (singer) without question. Mr.bonus 17:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No doubt.--EchetusXe (talk) 01:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic 

message: I think Tom Jones (singer) is definitely the primary topic here, so I propose to move this to Tom Jones (disambiguation) and move the former article to this title, linking to the dab by use of . Any objections? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   21:14, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal 

message: Why isn't this automatically redirected to Tom Jones (singer)? You make it really hard to look for. It's plain stupid. --Fluence (talk) 01:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: See the "Move proposal" section above and Talk:Tom Jones (singer)#Move ? and Talk:Tom_Jones_(singer)/Archive_2#Move. DH85868993 (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

text: For literate people, The History of Tom Jones, an important work of literature, trumps a modern pop singer by far. Equinox ◑ 16:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that anyone is suggesting you are illiterate, Fluence. 86.187.174.149 (talk) 19:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is one Tom Jones
Talk:Nisga'a Memorial Lava Bed Provincial Park

message: We have two articles about the same park. One using the English name Nisga'a Memorial Lava Beds Provincial Park, the other using the Nisga'a name Anhluut'ukwsim Laxmihl Angwinga'asanskwhI Nisga'a Provincial Park. Obviously, we only need one article. Any thoughts on which naming convention should be followed for the article and which should be redirected. Canuckle 02:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I get a google hit of 523 on the former and 101 on the latter... if that helps. Both seem to be its offical name, so for simplicity's sake, I'm tempted to suggest using the shorter title.CindyBotalk 06:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the Anhluut'ukwsim Laxmihl Angwinga'asanskwhI Nisga'a Provincial Park should be merged into this article because most people would probably search for the English name and has a shorter title. Also, when I made this artcle, I didn't see any other name except the one for the title. Black Tusk 12:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge proposal

message: The name of the park is actually Nisga'a Memorial Lava Bed Provincial Park not Lava Beds as it now states. I changed it in the text, not sure how / if I can change the name of the article as a whole though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.213.25 (talk) 06:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is spelt in both ways. BT (talk) 08:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the Article
Talk:Low German house

message: @Bermicourt: Niedersachsen = "Lower Saxony"; "niedersächsisches" would be "Low Saxon" - see entry below
I'm a native speaker of both German and Low Saxon. Niedersachsen in this case does not refer to the territory Niedersachsen, but is the plural of Niedersachse, a person of the Low Saxon people. So technically it's Low Saxons' house, but that kinda sounds odd to me. --::Slomox:: >< 12:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your advice. What you say makes sense - I guess there's no way we English speakers could tell from the spelling whether it means the state or the people. I accept you are right, but does this mean that the last one in the list - Westfalenhaus (Westphalian house) - is also correct because it refers to die Westfalen i.e. the Westphalians and not das Westfalen or Westphalia? --Bermicourt (talk) 13:24, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I (being a native german from Mecklenburg) would say so. Since german states and historical names often bare similiarities one (even us `Krauts´) can get into trouble deriving those original meanings right. Niedersachsen should refer more to the so-called `Reichskreis´, than any territorial form of a state.--85.183.156.182 (talk) 18:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  My sense is that whether the German word refers to the territory or the people, we would still use the adjective. I can't think of English examples where we use "Fooians' " rather than "Fooish". And the literature uses "Low Saxon House" rather than "Low Saxons' House". Ditto with "Westphalian House" as far as I can tell from google books. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Niedersachsenhaus 
Talk:Collegium Nobilium (Warsaw)

message: old with international alumniVictuallers 16:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was Collegium Nobilium in Olomouc since 1725, and it is still continued as Brno University of Technology, for details see Palacký_University_of_Olomouc#Revival_and_expansion_after_the_Thirty_Years.27_War. This article needs to be rearenged to refer to that fact. I suppose it would be better to leave this one as disambiguation and start new ones, which will feature in brackets, whether they are Collegium Nobilium (Warsaw) or Collegium Nobilium (Olomouc).Cimmerian praetor (talk) 21:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, vast majority of sources concern the Polish one. It should stay here. I'll split the Czech one to Collegium Nobilium (Olomouc). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The only sources on the page where about the Czech one. I am moving this article to Collegium Nobilium (Warsaw)Cimmerian praetor (talk) 18:51, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Olomouc
Talk:Peano existence theorem

message: I am not sure  if Peano existence theorem is the most common name for this theorem. MathMartin 17:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there, I was suprised to see this article missing, too. I did a quick search to see if this is covered anywhere else, but could not find anything. On a more general level all the articles on ordinary differential equations look a bit neglected. The french and german wikipedia seem to do better in this regard. MathMartin 14:34, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: hey, Martin. just also wanted to add that the statement of the theorem in the current version seems kinda funny. R × R itself is open and simply connected but to claim the globlal existence of solutions in general is certainly not right. perhaps one wants to say a solution exists in a neighborhood of (x_0, y_0). Mct mht 14:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you are correct, I want to state a local version of the existence theorem. But up till now I could not find any discussion on local solutions, extension of solutions and global solutions in wikipedia. Therefore I added stuff at ordinary differential equation. I will try to expand and fix the article later. Perhaps I should be honest and tell you I am just learning this stuff. So be prepared for some serious mistakes on my side :). Comments and help are always appreciated. MathMartin 14:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, hope to see you around. :-) Mct mht 15:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common name ?
Talk:Reading Power Station

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Israel-2013-Tel Aviv 01-Reading Power Station.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 15, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-02-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Israel-2013-Tel Aviv 01-Reading Power Station.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: Press accounts indicate plans to close and redevelop the Reading Power Station.  https://www.timesofisrael.com/tel-avivs-iconic-power-station-to-close-become-apartments-report/.   Proposing update to the article to reflect.One-Off Contributor (talk) 02:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure and Redevelopment
Talk:Ramat Aviv

message: Deleted Yael Bar Zohar from the Notable People list. For some bizarre reason she was listed as coming from this community when all she did was star in a TV series named after it! 68.146.52.234 (talk) 21:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Hebrew WP she grew up in Ramat Aviv. The show was about Ramat Aviv Gimel, an entirely different neighborhood. gidonb (talk) 14:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yael Bar Zohar grew up in Ramat Aviv Gimel --Ramitau (talk) 00:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Fiction vs. reality

message: There is absolutely no reason to redirect articles based on name similarity. We do not merge London, Ontario and London, England either. Even if a river Thames flows through both. gidonb (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Meltham branch line

message: Notes for myself or anyone else interested in this article:
Planning application for conversion to Meltham Greenway can be found at http://www.kirklees.gov.uk/business/planning/Details.asp?id=2007%2F94949. This is now complete. Photo of route at :File:Meltham Greenway at Mean Lane bridge.jpg. Adambro (talk) 14:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll update the article. Scillystuff (talk) 15:44, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I've added a footnote summary of why Woodfield Station opened and closed in the same month based on the Board of Trade documents held in the National Archives. My research is available at https://huddersfield.exposed/p/8f7 (including the correct location of the station, as shown on a map drawn by the then Huddersfield Corporation Borough Surveyor) if anyone wants to use it to add details to the main body of the article. Please note that much of the information about Woodfield Station that has been published in print to date is either speculative or inaccurate, as the authors appear to have based it entirely on the Huddersfield Chronicle closure article rather than seeking out primary source materials. Similarly, most of the websites I've seen give the wrong location for the station as they seem to have assumed a flight of stone steps from Beaumont Park Road led down to the station -- in fact they were built a decade after the station closed to provide an replacement public right of way lost during the laying out of Beaumont Park. 82.29.96.250 (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodfield Station 

message: The entire "History" section is a word-for-word copy of pages 88 & 89 of "The History and Topography of South Crosland, Armitage Bridge and Netherton" (1938) by Philip Ahier. The work remains under copyright until 1 January 2046, being 70 calendar years after the death of the author. Davepattern (talk) 19:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation
Talk:Harry F. Bauer

message: I deleted the notability tag.  If a person has a destroyer in the US Navy named after them, that's pretty "notable" Rapier1 (talk) 04:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: User:SeanNovack  Well said.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Text and references copied from USS Gregory (DD-82) to Harry F. Bauer,  See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Talk:Mimsy Were the Borogoves

message: Hahaha, that's got to be the most unsubstantiated unsubstantiable pseudoscientific claim i have ever heard. I'm extremely curious where that number even came from. Perhaps from George Dubya's scientic advisors.
:: Shitsticks like you need to make everything into a political debate?
I removed the following:
 When it is sent to the past, two small children find the box and discover that the future is in danger because of tiny air pollutants that are destroying the future bit by bit. 
as it refers to the plot of the upcoming movie, which is not a part of the story's plot.
:: The motive of sending toys to the past is made very clear in the movie (and is elegant). By removing this film's motive, above, the plot summary is left without a motive for time travel. Geologist (talk) 00:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1 Billion Neural Patheways

message: As noted above, there were some inconsistencies between the article's synopsis and events in the short story. Although it's been awhile since I've read the story, I took a stab at adjusting a few points. I'll re-read MWTB soon and take another stab at condensing it (unless someone else gets to it first).  —  Jim Dunning  talk  :  04:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot synopsis rewrite
Talk:Germany's Next Topmodel season 2

message: okay, Sophie and Alina quit so could they be included in the table? like it could be yellow background or something. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.102.3.172 (talk) 04:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Callout-Table 

message: What is Antje's surname? --82.207.191.148 21:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antje's surname
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/What a difference a friend makes

message: I understand the concern on the content.  I revised it to make it more fact based.  I think this information is missing (fact/myths) and the issue of recovery in mental health and the importance of friendship to mental health recovery.
:Hi; I am sure that the imformation is important - it's just that you don't find entries of this nature in encyclopedias.  Further, another editor has raised a concern that your entry here may violate the copyright of http://www.whatadifference.org/, and as such will probably be removed in very short order. ◄Zahakiel► 18:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, well, that would be good to indicate in the source information. Regardless, no article on Wikipedia should merely duplicate a source on another site. It shouldn't be copied and pasted. Leebo T/C 18:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To delete the page, you can blank all the information on it and/or add this text to the very top of the page:   An administrator will come by and take care of it. Thanks. ◄Zahakiel► 18:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Blackwater Falls State Park

message: The "History" section of this article seems to address land outside of the park, and a controversy that is unrelated to the natural history of the area or the history of the park itself.  The section also asserts several facts without providing any references.  Would someone care to re-write the history section and add references?
:I will be happy to do so. I don't read anything there about land outside the park or a controversy... What were you thinking of? Valerius Tygart (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section 
Talk:Archduke Rudolf of Austria

message: I removed this link:
* List of his compositions
Because it links to some other composer.  I couldn't find von Habsburg-Lothringen in that database, but the site was confusing, so he may actually be hiding there somewhere.  If anyone knows where he is on that site, or any other list of his works is, it would still make a valuable external link.  It looks like the link came from a merged page, and I don't know how to find the history of that old page, so I cannot tell who added the link in the first place.  
If any lists of works are found, in fact, they should be extrapolated into a List of Compositions by Rudolf von Habsburg-Lothringen page.  This all disregarding all the other obvious work this article needs.  
Asmeurer (talk  ♬ contribs) 04:09, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of works 

message: At its current version the article does not mention Beethoven's piano sonata No. 26 among the works dedicated to Archduke Rudolf. This piece is especially important in that list, as it is related to a significant event in Archduke Rudolf's life (which is also absent from the article in its current version), and as it also shows something about his relationship with Beethoven and the strong emotions his departure evoked in the latter. Therefore, along with adding it, I find, it would make sense to include more background information about the circumstances that compelled Archduke Rudolf to leave Vienna in 1809 (and those that enabled him later to return). I could edit the article myself, but it would be better if someone more knowledgeable about the matter than me could do it, as all I know is the fact that it had to do with Napoleon's attack on Vienna, and I think more details are desirable. 2A02:8109:9340:136C:6970:9958:1A03:9B46 (talk) 23:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  His departure in 1809 and subsequent return