Talk:34 (number)

message: I fixed the opening few paragraphs as well as merged the science section with its sub-section to form one new, better looking article.
Mundokiir (talk) 09:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit. 

message: Rule 34 deserves a mention here, at least as much as the other things in the "Other Fields" section. Just because Wikipedia decided against an article on Rule 34 (happily replacing it with an article on a more obscure rule 34, no less), that doesn't mean there needs to be a vendetta against any mention of it anywhere. --MQDuck (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: However including the link to a porn site as a reference seems a little much WP:ELNO Cgeorge1122 (talk) 04:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

text: XKCD is only a source for itself.  I see no reason why it should be credited as a reference.  An external link to that "issue" of the webcomic is within reason, but it should not be a "reference".  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rule 34

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.ngcic.org/
** In IC 1337 on 2011-04-23 17:08:25, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In IC 1337 on 2011-04-24 04:34:10, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In 10 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:06:58, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In 10 (number) on 2011-05-31 22:27:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In 11 (number) on 2011-06-01 02:53:15, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In 138 (number) on 2011-06-01 14:55:19, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In 26 (number) on 2011-06-19 05:45:43, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
--JeffGBot (talk) 06:43, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/SEsaros/SEsaros1-175.html
** In 138 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:57:59, 404 Not Found
** In 138 (number) on 2011-06-01 14:55:24, 404 Not Found
** In 159 (number) on 2011-06-01 18:16:47, 404 Not Found
** In 28 (number) on 2011-06-19 05:54:47, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 06:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case! Not interesting!
* http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/LEsaros/LEsaros1-175.html
** In 10 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:07:31, 404 Not Found
** In 1520s BC on 2011-05-23 03:34:42, 404 Not Found
** In 1630s BC on 2011-05-25 01:51:51, 404 Not Found
** In 10 (number) on 2011-05-31 22:27:15, 404 Not Found
** In 11 (number) on 2011-06-01 02:53:24, 404 Not Found
** In 1409–1400 BC on 2011-06-01 15:26:12, 404 Not Found
** In 159 (number) on 2011-06-01 18:16:53, 404 Not Found
** In 28 (number) on 2011-06-19 05:54:42, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 06:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 3 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 34 (number). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090609170451/http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/SEsaros/SEsaros1-175.html to http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/SEsaros/SEsaros1-175.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5Pp20VQlI?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov%2Feclipse%2FLEsaros%2FLEsaros1-175.html to http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/LEsaros/LEsaros1-175.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi,
This page for number 34 mentions that it is one of the magic number in physics but the page linked from there does not mention 34 a single time. Is there a mistake?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.140.96.140 (talk) 09:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My interpretation is that the link says what a "magic number in physics" is, while the references say that 34 MAY be a new one.  So claiming that 34 is a magic number is a bit of a stretch.  Delete that part if you want to? DavidHobby (talk) 13:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  34 as a magic number 

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#List of British bingo nicknames for a centralized discusion as to whether Bingo names should be included in thiese articles.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bingo names -

message: An IP address added some stuff on "Gilda numbers", and variants.
I'm happy to talk about this, but these seem to just be made up.
First, there should be an article on Gilda numbers.DavidHobby (talk) 02:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for removing this. It's Appearing Repeatedly in Quite a Distinctive Style.  It seems to be unsourced numerological nonsense that can safely be removed.  See also angel numbers. Certes (talk) 08:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gilda numbers, etc