lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mashpia

message: A Mashpia is not exclusively a Chabad concept. --רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 18:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The idea of a guide is universal. The idea of a guide for being a Chabad Chossid is termed a Mashpia. If you have proof of others who use this term, please provide it. Yehoishophot Oliver (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Can we trim this list? Or lose the list format and have several paragraphs talking about the ones who matter? 208.102.160.123 (talk) 03:40, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-notables 

message: In order to counter gender bias on Wikipedia, I suggest renaming the article to Mashpi'im instead as that includes both men and women. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 03:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Countering gender bias
Talk:Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron

message: The source (or refs) for claiming that the Rabbi's parents immigrated from Iran is missing. In particular, it isn't true about his mother, Tova, since, as far as I know (from 'Arrutz 7' channel & more), she immigrated from Aleppo (in today's Syria), and met her husband-to-be, Ben-TZion, in Israel. Substantiation is required. בנצי (talk) 10:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected the information using the Arutz 7 source. Havradim (talk) 13:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: regarding Rabbi [[Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron]] origin
Talk:List of chief rabbis of the United Hebrew Congregations

message: The description uses the chief rabbinate's own self-published page as a source for the opinion that "His title and position has historically, since 1758, been considered to be the Jewish community in Britain's equivalent of the Archbishop of Canterbury."
This is clearly not a neutral source for broad UK Jewish consensus on the role. It may well be disputed by those on both the left (eg Reform, Liberal, Masorti) and the right (eg Chabad). GS(v) (talk) 09:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View 

message: Except for the final sentence, the description is un-sourced. This is particularly acute for statement such as "as the oldest and original denomination". GS(v) (talk) 10:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Citations Needed
Talk:Future Launchers Preparatory Programme

message: Rik ISS-fan (talk) 22:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

message: Thanks to everyone that has helped to improve this wiki. This discussion topic is supposed to make moderating easier. State the improvements that have to be made in the form of a bullet list. Thanks for your help. Rik ISS-fan (talk) 16:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed modifications 

message: I've completely renewed this wiki, so I request for a total review. Including Class and Importance evaluation. Rik ISS-fan (talk) 22:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: This page was classed as 'stub' because of that I want to drastically update this page. I propose the following structure:
Introduction:
* Purpose 
* Program planning 
* Program outline (what it entails)
* NGL 
 - Launcher concepts (6 launcher concepts made)
 - Propulsion technology 
 - Structure technology 
* Ariane 5 ME
* IXV
* Political Discussion and other difficulties
* Resent developments
* See also
* Reference
* External links    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.45.231.141 (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed new page structure 

message: Since you obviously have chosen to use the British English style (ex.: Programme in the page title), which is fine, I'm just curious as to why you're being inconsistent and using the American program in the text? Articles are supposed to use a consistent English style, once chosen. (See MOS:ENGVAR and WP:CONSISTENCY.) JustinTime55 (talk) 18:03, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistent English variant 

message: Clean up some of the prose, its a little rough. I can specify if you need to, but its not very good throughout the article.
Cite every bullet point in main objectives.
Cite every paragraph in Approach.
Cite the collaboration paragraph.
Cite information in Structure.
Cite info in Inception.
Cite Period 1, Period 2 Step 1 and Step 2.
Cite every paragraph in Projects and in Coordination with other programmes.
Delete items in the See Also section that are already linked in the prose of the article.
Remove external links that are already included in the inline citations.
There are some images that could add to this article; add at least one.
Can't review criteria b2 until criteria b1 is satisfied better.
Start class for now.
Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Kees08 (talk) 19:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Delacroix, Louisiana

message: Pedro (Pierre) de Marigny de Mandeville, Musketeer of His Very Christian Majesty the King of France Louis XV, Knight of the Royal and Military Order of Saint Louis, enlisted in the "Companies de la Marine," campaigned against British troops in Ft. Bute of Mandchak, Baton-Rouge (l779), LaMobile (l780). He was the Spanish Governor Bernardo de Galvez's aide-de-camp during the siege of Pensacola (l781) (see: Honor and Fidelity, by J. Holmes)
On Galvez recommendation, Pedro settled Spaniards from Canary Islands on his own plantation ("La Terre aux Boeufs"). They called them "los Islenos" or "Islanders."   The village was named in honor of the Countess Livaudais du Suan de la Croix, who built its first church and school. (Louisiana: A guide to the State, 1941, US History Publishers) She was the great grandaughter of Pedro.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.251.39.39 (talk) 19:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of historical capitals of Vietnam

message: :vi:Thủ đô Việt Nam? Newone (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes--Amore Mio (talk) 16:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki 

message: The different dynasties between the "Chinese" domination have only in common that they ruled over more or less the same ethnic group. The areas were different and they were no legal successor of each other. The title "List of historical capitals of Vietnam" is therefore wrong. It should be "List of historical capitals of the Vietnamese".
If it is about the area that is now Vietnam, it should on the other hand also include the relevant administrative capital of the "Chinese" rulers (like Dai La citadelle).
Stefanhanoi (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Title of the Article and Administrative Capitals Under Chinese Rule?
Talk:Jewish Theological Seminary Library fire

message: Lovely story, but written in a non-encyclopedic style. Needs revision and sources.--Gilabrand 12:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  very descriptive 
Talk:Paula Hyman

message: I have on idea who added what, but citing a source does not mean copying it word-for word, as has been done with the references to The Forward.  I have removed the copyvio. MSJapan (talk) 18:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 
Talk:Tyler Posey

message: Are we going to talk about this? You can do a search on twitter or google and find it. He filmed it himself and you see his face and everything. Not sure how newsworthy it is, but it definitely happened. --RThompson82 (talk) 03:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *Probably not notable enough for Wikipedia. Aoba47 (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

text: Ok 68.206.128.27 (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 2017 leaked video 

message: i just got linked to his page because he plays father miguel in the tv show undone but there is no mention of it in his filmography or anywhere on the page. Can someone mor qualified untangle this? 85.228.245.125 (talk) 22:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing filmography
Talk:R34

message: What is rule 35 2601:285:3:D040:B9C1:CAA5:5188:F369 (talk) 04:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: money just money 65.190.18.226 (talk) 00:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rule 34
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Matthew Fowler

message: The talk page has been retained as containing information related to the deletion that is not included in the AFD deliberation. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

message: First of all, it was not my claim that the Australian Democrats are an obscure party. The Democrats themselves certainly are notable: that's why the party has a wikipedia entry.
However, that does not mean that every single candidate the party fields is therefore notable and merits a wikipedia entry. 
You assert two reasons as to why this person (as opposed to his party) is notable:
1. He is apparently "extremely well known on Kangaroo Island, SA and Alice Springs NT because of running as candidates for council". But this is vague and unverified.
2. He achieved "15% of the vote in the race for Mayor on Kangaroo Island." That translates to a few hundred votes at best. This a pretty weak basis for notability.
Dlw22 07:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1) It's called a typo in the UK, what do the Aussies call it? 2) Because this resident of the UK knows enough to read WP:N and WP:BIO before writing an article about someone who thinks that being a serial candidate is enough for an article in WP. YMMV. --WebHamster 03:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: It all depends on what the consensus is in the AFD --WebHamster 10:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this article should be deleted
Talk:Bulan (Khazar)

message: If you are in any way familar with the jewish religion you must know that they never had any missionary system.
Therefore you were not able to become jewish right on the spot. And that has not changed until today.
The reason for King Bulan to switch from Shamananistic Tengrism to Judaism is a by far more warfare like reason than this "story" 
here in this article. There was an awfull big wealth in the khasARIAN tribe, from which the further jewish AshkeNAZIm rose.
And here is the split from sephardic jews belonging direct to the bloodline of King David and the converted khasARIAN AshkeNAZIm
who are the once who pushed the word "chosen tribe" to the maximum. 
1000 years in Diaspora has diluted the jewish bloodlines dremendously therefore this pact was seemingly mainly made.
I am sorry for my poor english but as a foreigner I do not know any better.
There is either no chosen tribe whether there is a master race.
--80.144.165.8 (talk) 07:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is something lurking in the cupboards of this article.
Talk:B'nai Moshe

message: Is Inca used for modern people?
Shouldn't they be named Quechua people or Aymara people or some of the other indigenous people of Peru?
--84.20.17.84 (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The answer to your question is no. Inca is not used for modern people. --Descendall (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That said, when this group is discussed, when not labeled "B'nai Moshe", they are most frequently referred to as "Inca Jews". Tomertalk 07:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incas? 

message: I removed a badly written and badly sourced section from the article. although i suspect that there is indeed a problem, this paragraph was very badly sourced (extrapolating on an already weak source and using this source alone) and seems like it was written from a very biased point of view. I'd welcome an introduction of a more balanced section and better sourced one. MiS-Saath (talk) 12:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intercommunal relations between Inca Jews and the existing Lima jewish community 

message: Where's that information? There are less than 3000 jews in Peru, I mean, the "formal" or "real" ones. --Enkiduk (talk) 19:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  10 000 jews in Peru
Talk:Juan Carrasco (apologist)

message: Although the Jewish Encyclopedia says that he was "born" about 1670, it also says that his work "Apology of Judaism."  was published at Nodriza (The Hague) in 1633.  Other sources such as
this one confirm the publication date of "Apology of Judaism." as 1633. Hence, he died, not "was born", about 1670. --Bejnar (talk) 04:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  about 1670: birth or death ?
Talk:Karol Sidon

message: I deleted a sentence that mentions a recent scandal involving this person, in accordance with the policy on biographies of living people. In order to put it back, it needs to be accompanied by a reliable source.  A Czech newspaper source would be ok provided it is a newspaper generally considered reliable rather than muck-raking. Zerotalk 23:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced negative material
Talk:Banarsi Das Gupta

message: बाबू जी के नाम से मशहूर श्री बनारसी दास गुप्ता जी का जन्म जन्म 5 नवम्बर 1917 को तत्कालीन पंजाब के जींद जिले के मानेहरु गांव में लाला रामसरुप दास जी के घर हुआ।  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.156.233.156 (talk) 18:59, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  बनारसी दास गुप्त 
Talk:AAR type A switcher truck

message: We should agree on what to call it before linking. Meggar 06:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: The potentially infringing link to the truck manual was only added in November 2019, so I think it's most correct to state that the article, as written is unreferenced (and potentially original research). Mackensen (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truck manual
Talk:Reuben Greenberg

message: Hey folks, I recently added some new citations to this article, though I avoided editing the article's content beyond that as I'm not comfortable enough with BLP guidelines to go that distance. There were a few sources I came across while editing this article which I couldn't find a good use for in the article but I think someone else might find a good place for:
* Article from the NYT about Reuben
* excerpt from of a book, from University of North Carolina, about Greenberg's role around the time of Hurricane Hugo (if anyone can get their hands on the whole book that could be even better for this article and related ones)
There's still a good amount of work to do for citations as of right now, and I hope someone is able to take up the task eventually. --Apathetizer (talk) 03:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaving a note about article's sources 

message: Also taught a semester at The Citadel in 1987 2600:1006:B132:98B9:9AF4:FC3F:602F:D2B8 (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teaching
Talk:Salmon ben Jeroham

message: Much or all of this article seems to be copied from the Jewish Encyclopedia at http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/13864-solomon-ben-jeroham, including the bibliography section at the bottom. ~ Anastasia  (talk) 22:04, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait a second. The template you used says "non-free copyrighted sources", while the article says "This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Jewish Encyclopedia. 1901–1906." Debresser (talk) 22:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whoops! :P My bad, I have removed the tag from the article. I'll just remove the bibliography, which doesn't support all of this articles' text. ~ Anastasia  (talk) 23:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Two improvements. Thanks. Debresser (talk) 23:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problems
Talk:Shavei Israel

message: There is nothing here about the political / nationalist / expansionist nature of this organization, which exists to increase the population of the West Bank settlements. I don't know a whole lot about the organization, but this is what it's best known for internationally, by far. <eleland/talkedits> 02:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information 

message: Too much is repeated here from the article on the Bnei Menashe, tilting this one to being mostly about them. That part needs to be summarized even more, as nothing new was offered here. Also, that section needs to be rewritten because of laboured English. It also sounds as if someone opposes this organization - RS must be used consistently.Parkwells (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unbalanced
Talk:Estonian passport

message: Please add Brazil in this page.
I am a brazilian living in Estonia for over a year. No visa is required for Schengen nationals to visit Brazil for 3 months.
Best regards,
Daniel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.45.124 (talk) 18:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazil is missing in this list 

message: I question the necessity to name the passport-producing company by providing a link which leads to a non-crucial advertisement page.
Kind regards, --Pathofdhamma (talk) 06:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability of company producing passport
Talk:Community Rule

message: I cant help thinking that Empireheart has waded in to change what were bullet points into prose (in itself, a good thing if done well) without regard to keeping the careful content of the original points.  Anything regarding the DSS is fairly contentious, and the secondary literature argues from a particular interpretation - usually the Essene hypothesis/consensus view for want of a better model - of the DSS corpus.  In an article on a primary source, we surely must be careful not to bundle together interpretations with a plain description of content.
If I were looking here for information about this manuscript, I would prefer the concise and accurate bullet points to the current "There is ..." prose revison (into which have crept a couple of actual factual errors, in addition to interpretive descriptions).
I have therefore reverted to the bullet version, until a better job is done.  78.149.94.49 (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent changes

message: An anon user has rewritten the article here a couple of weeks ago.  And the revision is dire!  What was an article that focused on the document and its contents has now turned into an article about the interpretation of the document and (not necessarily) related people and places.  Why are we having the discussion of, for example Josephus' Essenes and Qumran ruin latrines, in an article on 1QS?  Or about the significance of the presence of women in the Qumran cemetery?  Save that for the Qumran and Essene articles!  Moreover, the few references that were in the article have been removed.  In adding all this irrelevant information, the editor has removed the entirety of the description of document contents ('theological themes').  Is it too much to expect an article that concentrates on the facts, free of interpretive bias?  I am undoing all the changes now, but will add select bits of the current revision to it later this evening to address lacking interpretative issues (plus an outline - it is a useful guide to structure, and a worthwhile addition to the article - though i shall probably choose a Vermes outline over Knibb's, simply as I have his work to hand) 188.126.80.175 (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rewrite
Talk:Teacher of Righteousness

message: After reading the article and the talk section, I do not find any reason for the POV tag to remain. The article mentions several competing theories about the identity of the ToR and none of them seems to be given undue weight. 49.205.139.212 (talk) 09:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag removal 

message: Jesus Christ should be a theory, right? 174.4.163.53 (talk) 14:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Teacher in question lived over 200 years BC (before Christ). WikiEditorial101 (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another theory 

message: Marked as ambiguous. The link to "Jesus" is to Jesus of Nazareth, but the sentence refers to another person of the same name 150 years earlier. I read this sentence many times over and I'm not quite sure what is being said: is the intent that the missing high priest was this earlier Jesus figure? I'm not a subject matter expert, just a reader not understanding the wording and hyperlinking. Rob Burbidge (talk) 14:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: He was trying to say that there was a priest who lived a few hundred years before Jesus (Teacher of Righteousness) who was slain (murdered) by Johnatan, who then illegally usurped the High Priesthood who could be compared to Jesus, who was a righteous one slain by unrighteous competitors (in His case the Pharisees); however, this describes many prophets who were slain for preaching unpopular motifs of reform, so in that broader context the comparison is made null by irrelevancy. After reviewing the source, I’ve clarified the statement, though I elect that by consensus it be removed entirely, as it’s wild speculation at best, and at worst not noteworthy at all. WikiEditorial101 (talk) 20:51, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing High Priest / Original Jesus 

message: References 1 and 2 mention a source it calls "CD". What is that? Editor2020 (talk) 23:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: CD means Damascus Document Mcvti (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD
Talk:Temple Scroll

message: What this article doesn't say, is how this scroll went from the  Qumran caves to the Israel Museum, (they were apparently discovered around 1956).
Neil Asher Silberman (1993) “A prophet amongst you”, about Yigael Yadin apparently has the interesting story; in 1967, just after the occupation, Yadin heard about an antique dealer in Bethlehem  who had the scroll. Apparently, both the antique dealer and his son where arrested, and were not freed until they gave up the scrolls. 
Unfortunately, I don't have access to the bokk, does anyone? Huldra (talk) 23:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  From another book: 
"In the aftermath of the war, Yadin acquired the Temple Scroll from Kando. That purchased ended a drama begun in 1960. At that time, a certain Reverend Joe Uhrig had offered the scroll to Yadin, supplying him a small sample and securing a return deposit of $10,000. Yadin never heard from Uhrig Again. In 1967, Yadin learned that the scroll was was now in Kando's hands. In the early days of the war, Yadin sent a detachment of soldiers to Kando's house in Bethlehem, where they seized the scroll, thereby saving it from the rot that was destroying it under Kando's floobaords. Later, Kando was compensated with a payment of $108,000." Schiffman, 1994 p. 16
Kando was an antiques dealer who pedaled the first Dead Sea Scrolls. It doesn't say when the scrolls came into his possession, but its not surprising that the original antiques dealer would come to possess the largest scroll. The book shows a picture of the scroll being substantially damaged, so it seems lik they saved it from neglect "under his floorboards". 70.20.32.149 (talk) 03:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Provenance]]
Talk:Thanksgiving Hymns

message: I've just taken out a large section of text that was placed below the reflist. It was lifted wholesale from here.--Ihutchesson (talk) 01:07, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material removed 
Talk:Betryal

message: It is easy enough to google Betryal site:www.sacred-texts.com/bib/boe/ to see that Betryal does not appear in the Book of Enoch.  Plus, the name is nothing like any of the other angels mentioned, instead being the word "betrayal" with an A removed.  This article is nothing more than cheap fiction, probably for a role playing game or something.  Ian.thomson (talk) 03:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Palazzo Malta

message: "In 1869, the Palazzo Malta, and the other headquarters of the Order, Villa Malta, were granted extraterritoriality by Italy.[2]"
:I doubt that, as in 1869 Rome still belonged to the Papacy / Papal States. The state of Italy, then a kingdom, had no say until after the Capture of Rome in 1870.86.42.195.135 (talk) 09:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1869