lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Order of Newfoundland and Labrador

message: Myra Freeman was never LG of Newfoundland and  John Hamm was never Premier. Also check the references for the dates of creation. ONl was created in May 2001, while the ONS was created in August 2001. Therefore ONL is higher in precedence. 68.146.33.124 (talk) 14:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right about the LG and Premier issue; my apologies for reverting that carelessly. However, your edits seem to ignore the Department of National Defence's own order of precedence for orders, decorations, and medals, which puts the ONL after the ONS. The Governor General's guide to wearing insignia and medals does the same. These are reliable sources and so please stop reverting the proper order of precedence until you've gained some consensus from the community to do otherwise. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 15:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Precedence
Talk:Order of Nova Scotia

message: For the 2006 ONS recipients, I don't think Mayanne Francis actually recived the ONS, she is just the Lt. Gov for Nova Scotia, I don't think she should be listed under Recipients. I took her off unless someone has something that says she actually did get it. An7drew 17:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Order of Prince Edward Island

message: I made a sortable list of all OPEI inductees current to 2020 on a separate page as done for the Order of Manitoba (see List of members of the Order of Prince Edward Island). Is this something that we're okay with, or should we move the sortable list here and delete the page?
Popcorned (talk) 02:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of a sortable list?
Talk:History of Poland (1795–1918)

message: Polish Wikipedia seems to have split off the WWI period in its division of 'history of Poland by period'. I think it is something we should consider in the future (currently this article describes the entire partitions period, 1795–1918).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split off 1914-1918 period? 

message: See:
*First Polish Republic
*Second Polish Republic
*French Fourth Republic
*French Fifth Republic
Similarily, articles History of Poland (1918-1939), History of Poland (1939-1945), History of Poland (1945-1989) etc. should be moved into articles named: Poland in the Interwar period, Poland in WW2, Poland in the Cold War etc. or perhaps one big "Poland in the 20th century" article should be created along with one for the Third Polish Republic, describing the current regime, how it formed etc. See: France in the 20th century. History of Poland (1795-1918) should be moved to Partitioned Poland or Poland in the 19th century.
*
79.191.227.130 (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request move: History of Poland (1989-present) to Third Polish Republic and so on
Talk:West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service

message: Does anyone know what the numbers after the stations represent? Is this the individual station number? I can find nothing in the text that references these numbers, ergo, Joe Public won't know either.The joy of all things (talk) 21:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers 

message: WP:NOTDIR is an important principle behind Wikipedia, as is WP:OR, WP:V and WP:RS. A long unsourced list of stations, duty systems and appliances based mostly on personal knowledge is not encyclopaedic and goes against all those principles. I replaced the original unsourced / original research list of stations only that is properly sourced - and to be honest I'm happy if someone thinks that too goes against WP:NOTDIR and removes it too. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exhaustive lists are not encyclopaedic
Talk:New Zealand Cross (1999)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
* :New Zealand Cross (1999) → 
* :New Zealand Cross → ?
– The majority of readers are looking for the 1999 award rather than the 1869 award (New Zealand Cross (1869)) (see pageviews: ) and the trend is increasing over time. Move the 1999 award page to the base name, deleting the current 2-entry disambiguation page which is not required, and use a hatnote to refer to the other article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: New Zealand Cross titles a page with content and so it must also be dispositioned. If this request is granted, then New Zealand Cross may be moved to New Zealand Cross (disambiguation) and tagged with  in accordance with WP:ONEOTHER, or it may be deleted to make way for the first proposed page move. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 19:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 July 2021
Talk:Precursor mRNA

message: I think this should be a redirect to "mRNA" the information is redundant Jasoninkid 00:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. hnRNA was the earliest term and then it was shown that the bulk of it ends up as mRNA. But I don't know that it has been shown that *all* hnRNA ends up as mRNA (i.e. is pre-mRNA) and without that proof, the identification of the terms, although commonly done, isn't 100% accurate. So I tried to rearrange the section to reflect this nuance.
Netrapt (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 07:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article provides information on explanation of precursor mRNA and how precursor mRNA transcript leads to mature mRNA through processing. However, this article could be improved with more informations added. For example, more detailed information on how precursor mRNA becomes mature mRNA through processing, which can be seen in the bookshelf of NCBI site (on text The Cell: A Molecular Approach. 2nd edition). Full citation is: Cooper GM. The Cell: A Molecular Approach. 2nd edition. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2000. RNA Processing and Turnover. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9864/) The information provided here provides pictures for better understanding and details on RNA processing in eukaryotes as well as prokaryotes and on turnover. In addition, more details regarding processing of precursor mRNA could be added. For example, information regarding the effects of 5' cap and poly A tail addition during processing could be included (how do they effect mature mRNA and proteins encoded later). Further, more details on splicing could provide better understanding of the bigger picture of the process to encode protein from transcription to processing to translation. Details on how alternative nRNA splicing could affect mature mRNA and protein isoforms, on the role of splicing enhancers, and on recognition factors could be added to provide a more clear explanation on the bigger picture as well as importance of the process of turning precursor mRNA into mature mRNA. Furthermore, informations on experiments involving precursor mRNA could possibly be added to show what factors can interfere with processing of precursor mRNA into mature mRNA. For example, a research article on PubMed that is provided by NCBI site shows that FUra could lead to cell death by inhibiting mRNA processing. The full citation is: Will CL, Dolnick BJ. 5-Fluorouracil inhibits dihydrofolate reductase precursor mRNA processing and/or nuclear mRNA stability in methotrexate-resistant KB cells. J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 15;264(35):21413-21. PubMed PMID: 2592384. With some more information added, this article would provide readers with better understanding on this subject! Kohw 03:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible suggestion to the article
Talk:New Zealand General Service Medal 1992 (Non-Warlike)

message: The correct name for the waterway is the Persian Gulf, and should not be referred to as the Arabian Gulf when using the English Language.  The Persian Gulf is the preferred term in United States English, UK English and United Nations, as well as the Wikipedia naming policy.  I do not disagree with a mention in the article Arab World which mentions that the term Arabian  Gulf as a term used by certain Arab countries, but I believe that by putting Arab/Persian Gulf, it only serves to confuses people.  As there are two 'gulfs' around Arabia.  The Red Sea (known as the Arabian Gulf in certain publications and the Persian Gulf.(JosephLondon 09:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Persian Gulf]]
Talk:John McFee

message: LOL! Right off the start, this Wikipedia article is a mess. I suggest you read the Doobie Brothers home page for the correct info as to McFee's DOB. Read below:
"John McFee was born on September 9, 1950, in Santa Cruz, California"
[]
By the way, John McFee is the webmaster for the Doobie Brothers website.--207.200.131.17 17:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John McFee Date Of Birth 

message: I heavily revised this entry to remove multiple POV criticisms of some latter-day Doobies albums. I'm not substituting my more favorable opinions for those of the author.  Wikipedia guidelines don't favor expression of any one person's opinion within a supposedly neutral encyclopedia entry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.97.239.130 (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms of The Doobie Brothers 

message: HEY JOHN,  KAREN FROM SP TRAVEL DAYS AND KEITH.  STILL MOURNING HIS PASSING. I DO SO LOVE THE JACKDAWG CD.  YOU LOOK GREAT ON THE WOLF TRAP DVD.  MAYBE YOU COULD STAY IN TOUCH,I MAY BE MOVING TO MALIBU SOON.  ALL MY SOUTHERN PACFIC #1 FAN LOVE,  KAREN  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.153.214.232 (talk) 00:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SP-KAREN DUNAWAY-ALEXANDER 

message: (, 99.9% a single-purpose account) who has semi-declared identity as being John McFee at:
*This page is about me, and because of the incomplete nature of the recording credits in particular, I have made a more complete and accurate listing of my work.
*I'm trying to make the credits more complete for the discography - this is my personal history, and it was very incomplete.
*Please watch this - someone seems to continue to try to wrap up my biography with negative absurdities, e.g. basing my diet on bird excrement, and now please look at the most recent (and actionable) entry concerning me.
*:File:John McFee 2017 Kilt.jpg "Photo of myself taken by my wife."
*:File:John-McFee-2010-2.jpg upload detail "This is a photograph of me, John McFee, that was taken in 2010 as part of a photo shoot for my band, the Doobie Brothers. ...- I own this image."
*:File:John McFee at Comic Con July 2011.jpg "This is a photograph of me that my wife took, when I was appearing at Comic Con in July of 2011."Contributor has been notified of CoI policy at own Talk.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 18:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connected contributor
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Cbrown1023

message: Category talk:	783
Category:	67
Image talk:	3
Image:	59
Mainspace	3283
Portal talk:	3
Portal:	1
Talk:	10143
Template talk:	548
Template:	203
User talk:	1861
User:	349
Wikipedia talk:	301
Wikipedia:	733
avg edits per article	1.40
earliest	16:47, 2 March 2006
number of unique articles	13102
total	18337
Editcount generated using Interiot's wannabe Kate's Tool. Nishkid64 00:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Frederick Kagan

message: Does this article belong in the "American military personnel" category?   While
Kagan taught at West Point for some years, I'm not aware that he was ever an
active duty member of the military.
: Is his religion relevant or confirmed?--Lord of the Ping 21:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: C-SPAN has Kimberly being the president of the institute for the study of war, not the executive director.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.53.213.60 (talk) 01:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kimberly Kagan 

message: Abenr (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth 

message: Here are two scholarly sources describing F. Kagan as a neocon in no uncertain terms.</br>
# In Empires Without Imperialism: Anglo-American Decline and the Politics of Deflection. AmazonJeanne Morefiel, Associate Professor of Politics, Whitman College, published by Oxford University Press in 2014 that describes Frederick and Robert Kagan as "well-known neoconservative activists"The relevant passage is on p. 73 </br>
#In The Culture of Immodesty in American Life and Politics: The Modest Republic (2013) edited by professors Michael P. Federici, Richard M Gambl, and Mark T Mitchell, Claes G. Ryn states The more prominent neoconservatives include… Frederick Kagan, Robert Kagan…--Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 16:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  As a neoconservative 

message: Really, I can't think of a legitimate reason to mention here that Victoria Nuland is Frederick Kagan's sister-in-law; anyone that interested in his family tree could check up on his brother's entry. This is Wikipedia, not Ancestry.com.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.98.118.115 (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  F. Kagan's sister-in-law? 
Talk:Darton Academy

message: I tried to clean up this article, but someone "local" to the school reverted me.  I've tried again with a minimalist approach: taggig for cleanup and style and putting the start and end into proper Wikipedia style. KevinCuddeback 01:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Stub class, almost a start class, just needs a bit more information. But a solid stub. Some interesting bits of information there, but still worth a Low. Twenty Years 17:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: I am starting a discussion here about whether the name of the former head teacher should be included in connection with the poor performance in previous reports. While the claims are now adequately sourced, The BLP policy, in particular, WP:NPF and WP:BLPNAME are relavent here. It is my opinion that this person should not be mentioned in this context, as we must err on the side of privacy. Quasihuman (talk) 10:54, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had the same reservations for the same reason. Though sourced, from the outset it's appeared to be a way to single out non-notables for alternately negative and positive assessment. Unnecessary. 99.184.134.27 (talk) 11:11, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Following re-addition of the irrelevant content, with its subtext that someone has a personal agenda, I've reverted and reported this to WP:BLP noticeboard. 64.222.237.179 (talk) 21:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also begun a sockpuppetry case here about the two SPAs doing this. Quasihuman | Talk 22:10, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, just adding my support to this consensus position regarding not including these names and WP:BLPNAME and WP:NPF. Off2riorob (talk) 22:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP issues re Ofsted inspection
Talk:Chrysopelea paradisi

message: Could Wikipedia post a photo or footage of this unique creature. Perhaps a discussion of the Bernoulli effect with respect to the shape of the snake's body in flight would be appropriate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.111.29.1 (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ΑρΡίΕ  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.77.169.139 (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  food
Talk:Interaction variable

message: hi, sorry, if my example is biased towards my experience... if it doesnt make sense or someone thinks they can simplify it further please do :) Tmov81 02:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Including interaction variables doesn't cause problems with multicollinearity (except maybe in some rare and not very noteworthy cases). If you have two variables in a regression model and you multiply them together and use the product as a third variable, the third variable can not be collinear with the other variables because it is their product.--Bkwillwm 23:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interaction and multicollinearity

message: The second sentence in this article says an interaction variable is formed by multiplying two predictor variables.
: 
But then later in the article it's talking about categorical predictors, which clearly cannot be multiplied.
: 
Now someone's proposed merging this with interaction (statistics).  And that article also begins by talking about multiplication of two predictors, just as if it's about that particular form of interaction  rather than about interaction in general.
: 
What a mess.
: 
Michael Hardy (talk) 01:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's assumed that the categorical predictors would be represented with dummy variables, which can be used to make interaction variables.--Bkwillwm (talk) 01:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Talk:Lists of civil awards and decorations of the United States

message: The title of this article is "Civil awards and decorations of the United States", not  "Civil awards and decorations of the United States government", therefore it seems to me that it should mention well-known and established privately issued awards and decorations, such as the Pulitzer Prize. That is not to say that every time a company gives an award to a retiring employee that that comes under the heading of "Civil awards and decorations of the United States". I mean the famous ones. After all, it mentions the boy scouts at the bottom of the page. Thoughts?--Nyctc7 (talk) 17:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government vs. privately issued awards 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved (no objections)   Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Civil awards and decorations of the United States →  – Per MOS:LIST Leijurv (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 June 2020
Talk:Murcia's language

message: this article is not finished. if you would help me, try.
:Suggestion: begin with where it's spoken, by how many people, what ethnic group if they're distinct. Then go into the relationship to other languages. ("Murcianese (Murcian?) is a dialect spoken by the xxxx people of the xxx region...") Fan-1967 01:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:New York City Hall

message: The reversion of this edit doesn't make sense:
*It included an unrelated subway video in external links. This belongs in the subway station's article.
*It restored an image error - "". "850px\" isn't a readable image size.
*It introduced an accessibility error in the popcult section.
*It moved architectural details from the already established architecture section back to the history section.
With that in mind, I would like to discuss this change. Epicgenius (talk) 02:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Make the technical changes without changing the text content or order, and I'm fine. BMK (talk) 02:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a reason why should I be restricted from changing actual content? My edits are not grammatically incorrect.Also, the subway turnaround video is not related to City Hall itself. If you want to add an architectural link to the station, fine. But this video can be included in the actual subway station article, because not many people looking for this topic are going to be interested with a video. this video is a dead link, making that link totally useless. Epicgenius (talk) 02:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Then by all means remove it. BMK (talk) 02:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerning a reverted edit 
Talk:Planet of Exile

message: Hi, I might be wrongm but I think the sentence: 
"Descendants of the earth human/Trevarian mix would eventually rescue a conquered Earth from alien conquerors who could mind lie - which they used to conquer the telepathic League of All Worlds"
is not actually consistent with the story told in the novel, and it's rather speculative. --Frankesko 22:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now added references to the other novels where it is explained.--GwydionM 16:54, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Reserve Good Conduct Medal

message: The U.S. Army, Navy, and Marines do not refer to any of these medals in an official capacity as "Reserve Good Conduct Medal". All these medals need to have indiviudal pages vice combined on one page and referred to something Wikipedia civilians came up with.--Ron John (talk) 09:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Code of Federal Regulations , the ARCAM is a good conduct medal: "Soldiers who are ordered to active duty in the AGR program will be awarded the ARCAM if they have completed 2 of the 3 years required (Army Good Conduct Medal eligibility starts on the effective date of the AGR order)." Tracy Von Doom (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

text: Also, in Chap. 4 (page 57) of Army  Regulation  600–8–22 on Military Awards , the ARCAM is described as a Good Conduct Medal. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 10:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Mehmet Akif Ersoy

message: ==Biased and unsourced==
Most claims in this article are laking a source or citation. Please rectify.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.52.108 (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Most claims in this article are laking a source or citation. Please rectify.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.52.108 (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased and unsourced

message: The entry does not reflect that he was an Islamist. It should be stated that he had important disagreement with the republican regime on the issue of secularism. This is probably the most important reason why he moved to Cairo. Nowadays, all historians of Turkish Islamism, most notably Ismail Kara, reserve a special position to Mehmet Akif, in the genealogy of Islamism in Turkey.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.251.74.132 (talk) 10:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mehmet Akif as an Islamist 

message: Mehmet Akif Ersoy Un hayatı 176.41.53.162 (talk) 19:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Türkçe
Talk:Navy Expeditionary Medal

message: I posted a link to this article on Facebook, but the thumbnail image shown with the link is incorrect - it shows the Navy and Marine Corps Overseas Service Ribbon instead of the Navy Expeditionary Medal. 24.61.4.237 (talk) 02:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remember correctly, you hit the arrow button to cycle the thumbs until you get to the right one.  This article has a navigation template at the bottom with thumbs of all of the ribbon bars of the naval service.  That is probably why you are getting that one.  Cheers.  EricSerge (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thumbnail 

message: The infobox notes that it is currently awarded but also (with a footnote that is just text) notes that the last award was in 2002. I don't have a source on hand, but since I deployed after 2002 and I have a few of these, I think we're still handing them out. Protonk (talk) 12:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I've seen a handful of sailors with this award. 02:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

text: ". . .I deployed after 2002 and I have a few of these. . ." --- not likely. Please don't make false claims here. Cite your citation(s).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.32.67.176 (talk) 14:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not demeaning you or your service, but what you have (that they hand out like candy) is the NCM, not the NEM  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.32.67.176 (talk) 19:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last awarded in 2002?