lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SEAT Toledo

message: Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a highly modified racing version of the Toledo used in the FIA GT Championship? I've noticed on various FIA GT websites that there are pictures of a second-gen Toledo with widened wheelarches, a huge rear wing and other modifications for racing. If the car is used for international motorsport, then there should be a reference in the article to it, because I came to this article hoping for information on this matter. If someone could enlighten me on the subject, that would be great. Happy Easter, Stealthman (talk) 09:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motor racing? 

message: Well, no, the Altea XL pretty much directly replaced the Toledo Mk III, dinnit? Not sure what to do about this section; anyone who feels up to it should update it. -- CRConrad (talk) 22:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree with you CRConrad. The statement that "The Exeo will not be a replacement for the Toledo according to the company." has been made by the company itself, since there was a need to clarify things due to the fact that both Exeo&Toledo are family oriented sedans. The reason why the Altea XL wouldn't directly replace the Toledo Mk3 is that the Altea/XL/Freetrack is a SUV in a two-box design, whilst the Exeo as well as the Toledo are meant to be sedans in a three-box design configuration. Certainly there are rumors that a replacement for the Toledo is going to be released next year, i.e. the Toledo Mk4 based on a three-box design derived from the future Leon Mk3, but WP should only include facts, this is why I am not adding such a comment. In conclusion, the section should stay as it is.(LeonCR (talk) 05:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Exeo will not be a replacement for the Toledo according to the company."
Talk:Beretta 96 Vertec

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 96D Vertec

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 96G Vertec

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 96G Elite IA

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 96 Steel I

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 96 Brigadier

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 96D Brigadier

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 96G Elite I

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Rás Tailteann

message: I've never heard the term Irish Tour - Rás used in reference to this event. Originally it was Rás Tailteann, then commercial sponsors took over and changed it to Sponsor sponsor sponsor Rás. However, since sponsors come and go, the race is now commonly known as simply The Rás. Shouldn't this article's name reflect that reality, and change to either Rás or The Rás? Rwxrwxrwx 10:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this page should be called The Rás Tailteann because thats its real name, The Ras is what it is referred to as in Ireland,so there should be a redirect from The Ras to The Rás Tailteann, but Irish Tour Ras is not the name, just a working name. --Dawesaudax 19:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The name

message: The winners in 1973, 1977, and 1989 are described as being from (or representing) Russia. Should that not be the Soviet Union? Rwxrwxrwx 10:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Russian" winners
Talk:Beretta 96G Elite II

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Tao (disambiguation)

message: Hi Wangi. Sorry for having messed up in your work today, and thanks for putting the things back in correct shape. I was surprised to see the disambiguation page so extended a few minutes after my last edit, that's why.  universimmedia 10:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, merging this and the other disambig page had been on my list of things to do for a while - both had entries that were also on the other etc! Your edit popped it to the top of my watchlist and reminded me :) /wangi 10:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This may not be that big of a deal, but "TAO", in all caps, is a very strange and in my opinion, unpredictable, title for the disambiguation page for all things spelled t-a-o.  This is especially so where so few of the entries are for things that are in all caps. Applying the principle of least astonishment, and where Tao is an article about the primary use of the word (it is a Chinese philosophical concept), the most logical location for a disambiguation page would be Tao (disambiguation), which currently redirects here. Although I could find no rule or guideline specifically prohibiting using a word in all caps as the title for the disambiguation page, I believe such a practice should be deprecated. Please note also that an administrator will need to make the move, as there was some sort of conflict when I attempted to be bold and move it myself, unilaterally.Bradford44 19:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Falls City, Texas

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/hlf04. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Yosakoi

message: I have erased 
"In the dialect of Tosa province (modern-day Kōchi Prefecture), "yosakoi" means "Come at night.""
The origin of the word "Yosakoi" is still unclear, butit is certain that it doesn't mean "come as night" in Tosa dialect, because that would be "ban kiya" (晩来や).
Jair Moreno (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the word Yosakoi 
Talk:Peter Craven

message: The intial text appears to have been a copyvio of the source I listed as "fansite". I've therefore removed the copyvio text and started an extensive rewrite. The fansite source doesn't sources itself and appears relatively unreliable, so I'll be using mostly the Belle Vue site's bio. - Mgm|(talk) 10:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Deletionist Wikipedians

message: This category should be "Deletionists" to match the rest of the subcategories.  — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 10:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: Can we delete this category too? :P enochlau (talk) 12:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with you! Maybe we shouldn't have a userbox. I also created some subpages on my userpage and I'm ashamed of it. Maybe I should delete those too. :) Rockstar (T/C) 06:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that if all you can do is mess with other people's work and criticise, instead of doing some real work and actually fix and be able to justify your messing with other people's work (not like it's hard to do, that's why there's google, DUUHH! But then that takes effort of course...), then perhaps you can get yourself blocked so as to delete your influence on this project. I think that membership in http://www.darwinawards.com/ might work better. --Achim (talk) 04:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: This page does not match notability guidelines. Delete it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.27.95.19 (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is non-notable. Delete it. 

message: Please add SquidSK.He us also a deleter DoraTheMora (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  One missing guy
Talk:Beretta 96 Stock

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 96 Combat

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 98FS

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 98 Steel I

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 98FS Brigadier

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:RER E

message: Why is there no E3?? Georgia guy 17:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Line designations on the RER use all odd numbers for the branches at one end of the central section and all even numbers at the other end. In the case of Line E, there is only one western branch (E1, terminating at Haussmann-St Lazare), but two eastern branches which are therefore E2 and E4. Vilĉjo 15:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  E3 
Talk:Beretta 98G Elite II

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 98 Billennium

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge