lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Belozersk

message: The name Valgetjärvi (Valkeajärvi) means White Lake.
The main settlement area for Finno Ugrian Vepsä (Veps) tribe at least up to 1240.
In fierce battles the Russians (Novgorodians) killed male population and resettled
the area with Russians from Moscow area conquered by the Mongols.
The women and children were taken slaves and were batpized to Orthodox Fate.
In the period of 600 - 1100 Valgetjärvi was important crossroad for fur exports.
JN— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.118.27 (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am curious: what is the point of putting this information on the talk page?  Why not incorporate it in the existing text?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Valgetjärvi / Belozersk
Talk:The Coup (The Office)

message: The commentary on the DVD by Rainn Wilson and others mentions a Shakespearean undertone. I don't think the M'n'Ms intentionally references the lieutenant show quite as much as the typical shakespearean test in Macbeth, which the show's cast make constant reference to? The dark mood of Michael could probably be noted as well.
It's all there, Angela as Lady Macbeth? Dwight as Macbeth? Michael as Macduff?
Cleverdan204 (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shakespearean overtones 
Talk:The Convict

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 16:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin
Talk:Spider-Man/Black Cat: The Evil that Men Do

message: Is this book even in continuity any more?  ie Post-OMD, did it even happen?  Also, between which issues of ASM does this take place?  I had originally thought it took place in the middle of the JMS run on ASM.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.120.67.198 (talk) 21:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity
Talk:Atauran language

message: Looks like this language has been confused with varieties of Wetarese on Ethnologue.  Population may therefore be wrong. — kwami (talk) 01:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Same opinion like you, but where did you read, it would be aBunak dialect? --J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 20:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Located in the Bunak area and reported to be Papuan.  But no direct evidence, which is why I tagged it.  — kwami (talk) 09:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed
Talk:North Shore, New Zealand

message: What was the population of North shore, New Zealand around the 1950's? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.89.40.148 (talk • contribs).
:Probably not quite 50,000 people. The population in 1961 was approximately 53,000, and it was already growing quickly. For more detail, see the second paragraph in this 1966 encyclopaedia article on patterns of settlement in Auckland. -- Avenue 00:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Population in the 1950s

message: I will request a move swap of this article to North Shore City, seeing that this is the official name. Cheers. MadMaxDog 09:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and did it; there was only a simple redirect in the way. -- Avenue 10:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: I'm experimenting. I noticed on the Tom Hanks page that this tag, if clicked by a user when it appears on the Tom Hanks article, makes it VERY EASY to find great sources -- by clicking news, it finds ALL the news articles and weeds out all the junk. Great tool! But I can't get Google to work other ways. I'm putting this tag here temporarily (please leave it for the experiment) so I can find good sources to improve the "North Shore City" article -- thanx -- btw I don't know if this will work. I'll remove this tag when I'm done. Tomwsulcer (talk) 01:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporary Tag Placed Here regarding BLP
Talk:Hilda Tablet

message: Could it be said that another model for Hilda was (despite the difference in gender) Benjamin Britten? Was not her all-female  opera Emily Butter a satire of Britten's all-male opera Billy Budd? Certainly some people thought so  and accused the BBC of bad taste when in 1976 (as far as I recall) they repeated the plays while Britten was on his death-bed. Tiresias13 (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another model?
Talk:Cybran Nation

message: I am not here to spend my time reverting, and as you apparently are, I will just focus on the Supreme Commander article. Expect these three articles to exist within a few months, when I or any other editor gets around to making them. If they are not a redirect, someone will probably pick up writing them sooner, which was my main reason for not redirecting. See you then. Page unwatched, too, so please respond on my talk page if you feel the need to do so. --User:Krator (t c) 23:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Note on the Edit War
Category talk:Algerian Jews

message: Should this catergory include people of Algerian family background?  How far back can you go? PatGallacher 22:45, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: @User:Greyshark09, Please provide a reason for your reverts. If you don't, I will restore my edits. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 20:17, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Arab Jews is a disputed term, applied in specific cases (such as Jewish tribes of Arabia). It is POV pushing to use it for Algerian Jews.GreyShark (dibra) 05:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @User:Greyshark09, I did not see any of your responses because you didn't @ me in any of them. The term Arab Christians is also a disputed term. There are even Muslims in Arab countries who would  would dispute the term Arab Muslims. I'm not sure why Arab Muslim and Arab Christian are acceptable terms, but Arab Jew is unacceptable. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 11:23, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote most of the Arab Christians article. See who can be defined Arab Christian and who cannot; most Christians in Middle East are not Arab, some are Arab; most Jews in the Middle East (including Israel) are not Arab, very few are. If you consider Middle Eastern and North African Jews as "arab" this makes Israel an Arab country.GreyShark (dibra) 12:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Arab Jews
Category talk:Algerian footballers

message: Are there really 677 notable Algerian footballers? I doubt it. 82.141.66.232 (talk) 02:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly not, and I actually doubt there is that much wiki-worthy ones either. 85.217.36.130 (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arthur Leopold Busch

message: This article is a complete mess - it contains POV and isn't written like an encyclopedia article, and some parts look like copyvios to me, but I can't verify that. It should be rewritten; if not, I'll probably revert it to the version that was kept in AFD. --Coredesat 15:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did so, but there's some stuff in history that could easily be fixed and reused. Philwelch 08:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: cleaned-up, but needs more citations--MChew (talk) 08:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is a mess 
Talk:List of nuclear power plants (United States)

message: While the list of nuclear reactors may be long, it is far more complete than these separated pages are, and somewhat more convenient if your searching for a page on a particular reactor that may exist.  It's also good for locating reactor articles that need to be completed and would be of interest to people who like to write nuclear articles.  Finally, when this page was created, links were not added in an obvious way to the previous list of nuclear reactors to redirect people here.  157.252.163.92 23:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compared to the list of nuclear reactors 

message: The page is now List of nuclear power plants (United States).
Previously, it was List of nuclear power plants of America, and listed such countries as Mexico and Canada.
--Ng.j 07:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved page
Talk:The Demon Seed (Xiaolin Showdown)

message: I've never seen this episode, so I find that image of the Heylin Plant to be very important in my understanding of the episode.  I have no idea what it is without that image. - Peregrine Fisher 23:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen the episode and it is not at all important. Knowing what the Heylin Plant looks like will not benefit your understanding of the plot. It's quite trivial that this happens to be the only episode in which the Heylin Plant makes an appearance. Being unique to the episode does not in itself mean it properly identifies the episode. Jay32183 23:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Michael Zorc

message: Not only did he play in, and win, the Champions League, but http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Zorc suggests he has been successful elsewhere (I don't speak German, so can't translate it). KeithD 23:02, 6 March 2007 
(UTC)
No offence - but should you be writing an article for wikipedia if you can't read the language in which the source material is written? andy 23:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: None taken. However, it wasn't the source for writing the article. My source was the UEFA Champions League 1996-97 article. I was simply ensuring that everyone who had won one of the biggest prizes in football didn't have a red link on Wikipedia. I realise it's only a stub at this stage, but that's not the same as not being a notable person. KeithD 23:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. But why not leave the red link as an encouragement to someone who can write a real article about it? Anyway, if you want to mark it as a stub I'm happy to agree that it should be kept, if no-one else objects. andy 23:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded the article a little, it's one I'd been meaning to do anyway. ArtVandelay13 16:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Hidden Valley Raceway

message: :File:Hidden Valley Race Way Track.png is far more accurate then :File:Hidden Valley Raceway (Australia) track map.svg. The problem with the svg version is the drag stip is shorter then it really is, pitlane is thin and longer, the corner numbers are pointless (and meaning less), the image has watermarking (forbidden) and the minor issue is the mi before KM. Bidgee (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Commentators and drivers frequently refer to corner numbers so they are definately not meaningless. The thinless of line is not significant, and if anything is helpful, helping to underline more specifically the difference between pitlane and circuit. The scale bar and the north arrow are also significan;t improvements. --Falcadore (talk) 15:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: which is pointless as this isn't the V8 Supercars coverage (Re: commentators and drivers), so no one has an idea why they are there for and are far too big. Pitlane is incorrect, the drag stip is incorrect, scale bar is untested, North arrow is good, and the map doesn't line up with the reliable data I have (I have placed it over it). Bidgee (talk) 15:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not just a V8 Supercar thing, everyone refers to specific locations on circuits by corner numbers. The other problems you refer to are minor. "Untested" is not a valid criticism. Prove its wrong. --Falcadore (talk) 21:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 
Talk:2006 Arizona Proposition 207

message: I have reverted this article back to a standalone article per the discussion found in Talk:Arizona ballot propositions (2006) in anticipation of a proposed merge of that article to a more comprehensive List of Arizona Ballot Propositions.  However, in doing so the text discussing this particular proposition would be lost and the most logical place to put it is back here on the proposition's own article.  Please let me know if anyone finds this disagreeable. Arkyan 23:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert to standalone article
Talk:Göttingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities

message: I've moved the page since "Göttingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities" is the official English version of the Academy's name as per their own web pages. The German word "Wissenschaften" encompasses both sciences and the humanities. Markus Pössel (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page moved 

message: According to de:Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen#lead, the academy was renamed in 1942, and its former name was "Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen". According to the English article (Göttingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities#History), it was renamed in 1939, and its former name was "Königliche Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften". Neither DE nor EN wikipedia gives a citation. While the name versions could be unified to "Königliche Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen", the dates cannot. Somebody who knows should fix this. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming date, former name: EN vs. DE wikipedia
Talk:Sutanphaa

message: moved. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 14:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Siba Singha → Sutanphaa — Relisted. Doesn't look controversial to me but you may want to post a note on Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 07:09, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: She should have her own article on Wikipedia, interesting history.
OttawaAC (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Phulesweri
Category talk:Botswana

message: The redirect CAT:BOTSWANA has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 16:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:CAT:BOTSWANA]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dopamine transporter

message: This page is written in a way that is virtually impossible for a non-specialist to understand. For example, one can not tell if the transporter is a physical structure that moves the dopamine or a chemical that binds to it, or both. 66.245.159.152 23:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Andrew, as it happens, all "physical structures" are made up of chemicals.  The answer to your question is "both".  WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficult for  non-specialist to understand 

message: This sentence "This does not apply to the prefrontal cortex where dopamine is reuptaken by the norepinephrine transporter[1], which is less effective for this purpose. Hence, dopamine in the prefrontal cortex spreads and persists longer than in other parts of the brain where DAT terminates the dopamine signal." is outrageously incorrect. First of all, this study was not done in wildtype mice. Only DAT and NET knockout mice were used. Hence this finding cannot be generalized to all mouse lines. Study from wildtype is very essential to draw any conclusive inference on this. On the contrary, there is evidence to suggest that DAT plays a huge role in frontal cortex, especially in humans, and pharmacological evidence using SPECT and fMRI suggest that congnitive function in frontal cortex is chiefly dopamine responsive whereby its action is chiefly determined by DAT. Therefore, I have removed this sentence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.149.207.239 (talk) 13:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of incorrect statement 

message: Could the action potential of cocaine be what makes it so much more highly potent of a DRI than other DRI's of non-generalized-sodium channel effecting classes, when administered IV? (So that the sodium channel blocking effects are not squandered on epidural membrane walls and other protective, effect reducing barriers against external substances)? 71.237.187.95 (talk) 19:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cocaine]] as an Na/sodium Channel blocker of the cellular wall and DAT's mechanism of action 

message: "Surprisingly, DAT was not identified within any synaptic active zones. These results suggest that striatal dopamine reuptake may occur outside of synaptic specializations once dopamine diffuses from the synaptic cleft." I believe active zones are small areas with high density of proteins, not the entire presynaptic membrane. This would mean DAT could still be located on in the synapse, and if so dopamine would not have to leave the synapse for reuptake. I'm also not sure whether this localization is in fact surprising. Also, we probably need a citation for DAT not being located in active zones. TalkPageWarrior (talk) 14:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Localization: Synaptic Active Zones
Talk:Iron filings

message: A prominent sentence in the Introduction reads as follows:
"Since iron is a magnetic material, it will align itself with the magnetic lines of a magnet in the same way a compass will align itself with a magnetic field."
(Here "it" refers to iron filings placed near to the magnet.)
But a compass needle is already a magnet, and it is interacting with the magnetism of the Earth as a whole.  This is the interaction of two magnets.
Whereas in the case of an ordinary magnet and iron filings, we are presumably not discussing iron filings that have already been magnetized. (Or if we are, this should certainly be stated!) This means we are talking about one magnet (not two), plus unmagnetized iron.  Which makes the analogy to a compass fail miserably, as far as I can tell.  
My conclusion: This part of the Introduction should either be deleted, rewritten entirely, or else clarified so the analogy is much clearer.Daqu (talk) 13:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction makes little sense

message: why do iron filings occur, in rather large quantities, in sand? Also, they often appear not to be oxidized. That seems odd. I suppose it might be iron pyrite... 69.226.102.130 (talk) 21:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've always wondered
Talk:1278

message: 1278 223.228.235.130 (talk) 15:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  GOIiSingh1278
Talk:Causation in English law

message: If someone is up for it, this page needs to have sections on criminal law and contract law, which both have problems with causation - particularly the former. I think an interesting question to ask is why contract law does NOT have problems with causation like tort and crime. Wikidea 00:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I could also add, perhaps, why do torts apart from negligence, such as nuisance, not have problems with causation either? (Is it a problem with the scope of duty being ill defined by our loss-based model of tort? - see Saamco for some starting points; this is very theoretical though). Wikidea 00:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other areas of law 
Talk:Chappell–Ganguly controversy

message: Is it just me, or is this topic not worth having a separate artcile for? It reads like an irate Indian cricket follower extensively rehashing a personality clash between a player and his team's coach. There have been literally thousands of these in the history of professional sport.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.160.162 (talk • contribs) 
:Yes, it passes WP:N, and was highly notable. Do you think I am a Ganguly or Chappell supporter? I'm the author. Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 07:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not worth
Talk:Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith

message: 207.144.66.39 23:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: It says up to 1959 not true my dad had a Silver Wraith 2 on a v plate so i suggest you update the page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.141.4.176 (talk) 08:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wow...
Talk:List of Arizona ballot propositions

message: http://www.azleg.gov/const/Arizona_Constitution.pdf
p.105 of 107
this is footnote 2. i can't fix now.
Romanfall (talk) 20:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference 

message: I see the propositions listed, but no 2018 results of the vote? Jusdafax (talk) 13:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 2018 Results?
Talk:Prime (liturgy)

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 04:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: Can anyone provide an English translation of the Latin used in this article? The Catholic Encyclopedia tended to presume its readers would be familiar with Latin. MishaPan 23:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Mike Bailey (actor)

message: Is it thought theat this article does not need a userbox and that is why people have deleted it? Also what is happening with the photo, as Thatcher131 deleted it. Is it due to copywright? Jt spratt 10:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: Can someone please add the filmography section to this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.163.153.76 (talk) 19:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography
Talk:Jean-Louis Calandrini

message: It seems highly unlikely that his alma mater was the Academy of Geneva since it wasn't founded until 1912. It is more likely that he was a student at the University of Geneva. StarHOG (Talk) 21:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to reconsider your favourite sources of information. The Academy of Geneva (which of course became later the University in Geneva, in 1873) was founded in 1559 by John Calvin. Sapphorain (talk) 23:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, you're right, I am using wikipedia! :) If you type in Academy of Geneva, or even follow the link in Caladrini's info box, it takes you here Rousseau Institute and that page says it was founded in 1912. If you go to the University of Geneva page, well, that's a whole other thing. Are the two the same? Does this page say he went to the Academy when it should say University? Something is screwy but I don't know what part. StarHOG (Talk) 13:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I corrected the link in the infobox. At his time this institution had a different structure, was not located where it is now, and was not called university. But it did evolve to become the University of Geneva, in 1873. Sapphorain (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for clearing that up. I was unsure so didn't want to make an edit. StarHOG (Talk) 13:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

text:   BTW, Academy of Geneva is also mentioned in the main body. Also, there are no references in this article to source any of this information. Do you know some sources that backs any of this up? StarHOG (Talk) 13:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academy of Geneva
Talk:Wikipedia community

message: The redirect Wikicide has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  jlwoodwa (talk) 21:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wikicide]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: how do I add images on Wikipedia? Abbaf jnr (talk) 06:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Abbaf jnr Welcome to Wikipedia. Please visit the teahouse; someone will be able to answer your question there. Please ask questions about Wikipedia there and not in article talk pages. Mseingth2133444 (Did I mess up? Let me know here) 04:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images