Talk:Elbrus (computer)

message: Elbrus-1 was not the first. CDC6600 and IBM 360/91 are attributed to be OoO. Elbrus-1 could not even decode more than one instruction/cycle
https://people.cs.clemson.edu/~mark/stretch_superscalar.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.241.247.189 (talk) 18:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Superscalar OoO

message: If somebody makes an article about Soviet computing, this
article form Creative Computing could help. -- Error 03:07, 30 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The E2K was not vaporware, the design was tape-ready. They simply did not have the 100mio dollars to pay for prototyping as only a western fab could manufacture it, not any domestic russian chip plant. You can read here that Intel bought the E2K design IP rights in 2004, that's what happened to this innovative design:
www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20040525031730.html
The article shoud thus be corrected!
(Also, I shall mention the rumour over IRC, that a massively parallel E2K-like architecture machine was built in the late 1990s or early 2000s and is being used for crypto cracking. Elcomsoft recently cracked the RSA-512 protecting Intuit Quicken fiscal databases, which may well be interpreted as an attack on the financial aspects of US economy and national security. A year ago Moscow's Kaspersky Lab anti-virus firm somehow cracked the 660-bit strong encryption of an Office file encasing blackmail computer worm to let users get their documents black. People on IRC claim both feats were done with a massive multi-E2K-ish domestic russkie system. 82.131.210.162 12:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grossly wrong! 

message: Because it is Russian state property. Intel "bought" Babayan team, they left the company. MCST continued to work with new managment and new team. 
147.91.1.41 19:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No, Intel did not bought rights for E2K 

message: re: http://realurix.livejournal.com/2007/10/16/
* Can someone confirm the SuperCISC is VLIW?
* Is is the Elbrus 3 that is "hardware implementation of a subset of ALGOL-68"
c.f. "По тому, что я читал о проекте "Эльбрус" и по общению с некоторыми людьми, работавшими в этом проекте, у меня сложилось мнение, что внутренним языком "железяки" должна была быть аппаратная реализация подмножества языка Алгол-68."
NevilleDNZ (talk)
: Seems, he is not from project team "читал о проекте "Эльбрус" и по общению с некоторыми людьми". Also, where can I find the SuperCISC term definition? About Algol = "у меня сложилось мнение", it is not a RS. `a5b (talk) 12:28, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Концепция операционной системы-1 - Ориентация на SuperCISC 

message: The article needs clearer distinction what were the SPARC compatible chips and group the rest by compatibility and similarity. Richiez (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: When you title this section "vs own design", what do you mean? Both classes are designed in MCST/ ITMiVT. Also, there are no SPARCs listed in the article. `a5b (talk) 03:00, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article lead says that some models were SPARC compatible. The Elbrus 1-3 obviously were not but the information given on E2K is conflicting: one line says it is "a project to implement Elbrus 3 architecture as a microprocessor" while the next line implies (probably wrongly) that it has something to do with SPARC.  After reading it once again it seems that the Elbrus-90micro is the only SPARCy CPU mentioned in the article? Richiez (talk) 09:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:   'Elbrus-90micro' is a series of sparc-compatible computers, which use SPARC chips named MCST R-150, MCST R-500, MCST R-500S (in russian: МЦСТ R-150, МЦСТ R-500, МЦСТ R-500S). These chips are designed by MCST. Also, SPARC is not a EPIC/VLIW. `a5b (talk) 12:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, looks much better now. Richiez (talk) 13:44, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPARC compatible systems vs own designs 

message: Due to the design similarities of Elbrus 1,2 with a Burroughs system, it was nicknamed El-Burroughs. I kid you not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.205.81.5 (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Elbrus (computer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304055344/http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/elbrus-e2k.html to http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/elbrus-e2k.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified