lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lake Macleod

message: Macleod in RDAtlas, GoogleMaps; MacLeod in BPAtlas and a fair bit on Google (searches). 
Area is 6 km² to 2200 km² at  (Structure and productivity of inland mangrove stands at Lake MacLeod, Western Australia). Looks closer to 1800 km² on the maps.  
Not freshwater!  (As cited in article; though might be sometimes). 
Gypsum is “mined” there. 
MBG02 (talk) 19:29, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff
Talk:Lake Mackay

message: In January 2024, a User misrepresented the WP:SELFCITE policy to justify deleting (from the Description sub-section) a two-sentence paragraph, first added in 2008, on the importance of Lake Mackay and its mythology to the local Aboriginal populations. The User had no knowledge of the relevant subject matter and deleted this long-standing material without first discussing the proposed deletion here. As their various User accounts have now been removed from Wikipedia, I have taken the WP:BOLD step of restoring the deleted section by reverting their action and am flagging that reversion here. For transparency, the sub-section does contain one self-citation, which is to a peer-reviewed paper on Lake Mackay in Australia’s highest-ranked academic journal on Aboriginal studies, published by Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Please review the reversion and comment here if you have any concerns about it. LloydGraham (talk) 01:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration of two deleted sentences
Talk:Classification of Nuclear Reactors

message: I propose merging List of reactor types into this page as the two pages contain nearly duplicate material and will, if merged improve the page. Mark 08:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur.  And I think it is a good decision to bring the other one into this one instead of the other way around because this one has the capability to encompass so much more. theanphibian 23:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the best option is merging both articles with Nuclear reactor technology since they all have a similiar subject.Ultramarine 08:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Frank Blaker

message: This article requires more information in order to be promoted to B class. Information such as parents names, details of his early life, when he joined the British Army, whether he attended Sandhurst or somewhere else, was he married, etc. If anyone knows some of this information, please feel free to add it into the article. 
Also if anyone can fix the date in the infobox it seems to be appearing the wrong way round. I've had a look at it, but can't work out what is wrong with the html (the birth date is appearing in one format and the date of death in another) — can anyone help? Thanks. — AustralianRupert (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information 

message: The article had a link to Taunggyi in the Shan States.  This is the wrong Taunggyi.  For one thing the Burma campaign did not reach there until 1945.  Blaker was operating in the Kachin State at the time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.20.11 (talk) 12:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Taunggyi
Talk:George Albert Cairns

message: I've more or less filled out the section describing Cairns's VC-winning action and the subsequent ordeal of making sure the medal was actually awarded. It would be great, however, to find some more information on Cairns's early life.AJMacPherson (talk) 02:47, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Early Life

message: It's also come to my attention that various dates have been reported. Unfortunately Chindit records are noxiously unreliable — or, in many cases, simply nonexistent. The VC action took place 17 March 1944; Calvert suggests he died the following morning. But the article lists 19 March as the official date of death. Any clarification would be helpful. AJMacPherson (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Precise date of death
Talk:Tul Bahadur Pun

message: In the section "Immigration Controversy", there is a photo overwritten by type. I don't know how to sort this out, I'm afraid, so any help would be much appreciated. Thanks. TessCruickshank (talk) 06:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

message: Thanks for the up-to-date picture. Mr Tul Bahadur Pun was a brave man who should have been proud.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.10.137 (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Podscope

message: This article was marked with the prod template on Dec. 13, 2006. The reason given was, "Notability concerns, searching hasn't returned much." --Alksub 08:16, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old prod

message: As of 10 July 2009 the site linked to is dead.  I rather think this should be deleted.--British cons (talk) 17:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead
Talk:Oregon Parks and Recreation Department

message: Why was this moved without discussion? The former title conformed to naming conventions, and much like we do not have an article titled William Jefferson Clinton (or State of Oregon), nobody calls this department by the current title of "State Parks and Recreation Department (Oregon)". Instead, the department itself calls it self the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department and uses the same for their mailing address. Even reliable sources and the state's largest newspaper go with Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. Also:
*{"Oregon Parks and Recreation Department"} gets nearly 25,000 Google hits
*{"State Parks and Recreation Department" oregon} gets nearly 5,000 hits
So why did this get moved to some obscure name? I know that the citation is the ORS, but if we go by that pretty much all state agencies would need to be renamed, such as Department of Transportation (Oregon). Aboutmovies (talk) 04:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have an issue with Oregon Parks and Recreation Department, but the reason I saw in the move log for moving to Oregon State Parks and Recreation Department was the ORS, so I corrected it with respect to that. I agree that the most common name does appear to be OPRD. --NE2 08:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So you are fine with it moving back to Oregon Parks and Recreation Department per the naming convention? Aboutmovies (talk) 04:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine with me. (Although it is technically "back", it was only there for about seven minutes total.) --NE2 17:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: OPRD has work to do, the leadership have potential but is lacking in being open to diversity among its staff and rangers who are working at its parks and campgrounds. Many folk frequent OPRD’s campgrounds and day use, some of the Rangers are judgmental, they profile objectify marginalize.
They are required to take diversity training and sexual harassment training, but that doesn’t mean they actually adhere to the policies and laws written and the training they sign off on. 
Until they actually adhere to this there will continue or to be problems with campers and patrons of day use areas. 
OPRD should develop a accountability program to hold those who accountable who lacking. 2600:100F:B135:B6FF:BCB3:15E6:B164:4DC5 (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusive, Diverse, non discriminatory.
Talk:Devakottai

message: this place got its name from godess named kottai and the godess has a legendary story behind it. this godess belong to a family called katrampurathar who were the first people to visit this place and cleared all the forests and made it a village  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.139.203 (talk) 18:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  devakottai
Talk:Huasteca

message: The text reads "parts of the states of Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Puebla, Hidalgo, San Luis Potosí, Querétaro, and Guanajuato". The map shows the Huasteca to only include parts of Veracruz, Hidalgo, San Luis Potosí and perhaps Puebla. The region certainly extends farther inland than shown. On the other hand I never heard of any corner of Guanajuato belonging to the Huasteca. 2001:4CA0:4403:0:14E0:6EDB:E1E6:3867 (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy between map and description 
Talk:Argument from love

message: My problem with the scientific criticism is that they were not based on sources that discuss this argument. If we can just use any sources to make our own claims, why not cite the Catholic church sex abuse scandals, news stories about God's Bigmouths and their homosexual prostitutes, some sources about the revenue of the US porn industry, and I'm sure we can find good sources about the divorce rate... There are plenty of sources we could use to back up the claim that the human track record on love, even that of deeply religious individuals, is precisely what you would expect from a creature made in the image of King Kong.
My understanding is that Wikipedia is not a debate Wiki. Even if the above criticism can be substantiated with reliable sources, it's not appropriate for an encyclopedia. It is much more professional to cite what academic philosophers, theologians, and popular atheists that have written explicitly about this argument. Vesal (talk) 08:21, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific theories of love 

message: The article was extensively debated on AfD it should not be emasculated afterwards by one of the AfD proponents.  (I'm sorry it took me ages to notice I've been on a big wikibreak)  NBeale (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The close was "Keep but remove WP:OR and WP:SYNTH." Now, you have reintroduced the problematic sections. Do you have a source that identifies the proposition "there are compelling reasons for considering love to exist in a way that transcends its physical manifestations" as a "main premise" for a logical outline of this argument? Vesal (talk) 10:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article was extensively debated on AfD it should not be emasculated afterwards by one of the AfD proponents 

message: Animals often can be seen to love each other, and even to love humans. What about the experience of love in animals, who are obviously unable to conceive of a religious basis for their love? Torquemama007 (talk) 19:11, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about animal love?
Talk:Mr. Satan/Archive 1

message: Yes, Whisper is attempting to move the page back to Hercule (Dragon Ball). This is a clear violation of Wikipedia Guidelines.
:
Whisper, if you're reading this STOP. You are vandalizing Wikipedia.
:
-- DesireCampbell 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You put together an "informal" move request. And then you get snappy when you see it "unenforced?" WhisperToMe 00:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

text: A consensus does not mean the same thing as a majority. WhisperToMe 03:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DON'T Move Request 

message: Based on my count and analysis of the discussion, I moved the article to here. Please, for my health, no move requests. No more whining, complaining. This has gone on for long enough. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 21:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Oppose - Hercule is still more common. WhisperToMe 23:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey
Talk:Harvard Graphics

message: I have information that Harvard Graphics was not the first commercial presentation graphics program. How do I go about editing this? Should I create an entry for the first presentation graphics program, with citations (journal articles, copy rights etc...), then edit the Harvard Graphics page to indicate they were not the first (probably the second)?
I am new to Wikipedia and could use some guidance and assistance.
Thank you,
Jeremykrey
:It's a bit late for a reply I guess seeing you posted almost a yesr ago! Personally the best advice I can give you is to get stuck in, click Edit and make changes as you see fit. Start with minor changes and work up from that. It's how I started. It does seem however that someone else has already modified the article to mention similar what you say, maybe it could do with adding your citations? AWoodland 11:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the first
Talk:Gary A. Tanaka

message: Gratuitous allegations about embezzlement are uncalled for here.  No-one is accused of embezzlement in this case.  This case hinges on whether or not Amerindo made a statement in a letter to one of its clients which was untrue, and if so, whether or not that constitutes mail fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, etc.  No embezzlement has been alleged by anyone.  Indeed, documents before the court confirm that when the company was wound up, all the clients received all their money back.  There were no missing funds.
	The trial has now begun, and the client has finished her testimony.  She did not claim to have lost any money as a result of this affair.  She did state that she had a long-standing friendship with one of the principals of the company (not Dr. Tanaka), but in the absence of any financial loss the judge ruled out any exploration of why she might have made the complaint, leaving the jury to draw their own conclusions.  Those conclusions should, in any case, not influence their decision making.
	
As for the 3-year delay in bring the case to trial, the Fourth Amendment legal blog (http://fourthamendment.com/blog) has discussed this case and noted that the original investigation was misconceived, leading the judge to disallow much of the evidence.  The prosecution has since asked for repeated delays as it seeks evidence relevant to all the various charges among the evidence which remains.  They were presumably seeking evidence of other allegedly untrue representations to clients, but so far none has been forthcoming, though the prosecution has not yet finished presenting its case.
Dr. Tanaka, like anyone else, deserves to be considered innocent until proven guilty, and that alone justifies viewing him as a victim in this affair.  But regardless of the eventual result of the trial, the destruction of Amerindo is a penalty far out of proportion to any crime of which Dr. Tanaka has been accused.  This, it seems to me, justifies treating him as a victim whatever the eventual outcome.  It certainly does not justify gratuitous allegations of embezzlement.61.18.170.16 (talk) 09:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manulife Place

message: It is still the tallest building in Edmonton, EPCOR tower is only taller with flagpoles included  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thunderpants2010 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: This history can't be right, it has the King Edward Hotel on this site till 1982, and the Manulife groundbreaking in 1981. 117Avenue (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Tommy Blacha

message: This page really needs more citations.  In particular, the thing about voted worst moment should have one and also the part about him living in Vegas and trying to promote fights in Japan and Russia.  Oh, and the part about who he has dated should be cited or removed.  Highonhendrix 15:53, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The main photo is captioned
    TV Funhouse panel at Comic-Con. L to R: Robert Smigel, Dino, Bob Odenkirk & Tommy Blacha
However, the file on Wikimedia Commons is captioned
    Robert Smigel, Doug Dale, Dino Stamatopoulos, and Tommy Blacha at the 2008 San Diego Comic-Con
It looks to me like Bob Odenkirk is not in the photo, so I am editing the article's caption to match the file's description. 
Attys (talk) 20:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mislabeled photo
Talk:Sociolismo

message: --I think calling it corruption may have unwarranted negative connotations. For the people of Cuba, this is a way to try and get around the horrible restrictions placed upon them by an oppressive regime. It may be better phrased  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.70.221.144 (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is another reference on the page, Beardo, see . And many more on the net. This article talks about it - . This page mentions a paper called "Sociolismo and Socialism". This article states "the contrast in Cuba between the official socialist system and the unofficial, who-you-know method of getting things done (called sociolismo, from the term socio, 'buddy')" . This article talks about socialismo - "the buddy system" . Etc etc.--Zleitzen 09:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great - now we need to get some more of the refs into the article. -- Beardo 11:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:South Asia Analysis Group

message: Gee, it looks like the rest of the article is a copyvio from http://www.intute.ac.uk/socialsciences/cgi-bin/fullrecord.pl?handle=sosig1130857435-20312 ... that's the other "Reference" that is not the subject's own website. —72.75.72.174 13:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further copyvio 

message: In the interest of cooperation, I have added  references for the three external links. --72.75.72.174 22:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanups 

message: The article copies the assertion from a Columbia University web page that describes B. Raman as "retired Additional Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, and presently Director of the Institute for Topical Studies, Chennai", but Strategic Affairs Magazine describes him as "a retired additional secretary of the Cabinet Secretariat and heads the South Asia Analysis Group in Chennai" ... the Columbia page has a bad link for the SAAG website, so who who knows how old it is, or how out of date the information may be? Neither web page is dated ... what is his current position?
So, is this individual an impartial contributor who can be independently cited, or are they the guiding force behind the subject organization, because the latter would raise WP:COI issues. It also begs the question of why is there a link to an essay by one of the subject's contibutors? Unless it is used to document B. Raman as the current head of the subject organization, it should be removed from the article's links section as being off-topic. --72.75.72.174 14:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  B. Raman affiliation 

message: The website has been down for several years. Mporter (talk) 02:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct?
Talk:Symplegades

message: Both Clashing Rocks and Wandering Rocks redirect here but my recollection is that there were two sets of rocks - one at the Bosporous (I think it's confusing to use "the Hellespont" to describe the single point where the rocks were) and another on the return journey by Jason/Odysseus' voyage which served as an alternative route to sailing between Scylla and Charybdis. Does anyone know enough to sort all of this out? Timrollpickering 08:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wandering and Clashing Rocks

message: Can anyone offer a proper pronounciation for "Symplegades"? I've heard it as sim-PLUH-gades and sim-pluh-GAH-dees and sim-PLEG-uh-dees and Lord knows what else. What's correct? Mattymatt 06:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounciation

message: They’re called the Pillars of Pompey because Magnus Pompey, or Gnaeus Pompeius, then Roman Emperor (80-49 B.C.), fled Caesar’s conquering of Rome (49 B.C.) by passing through the Symplegades with a small naval detachment, narrowly escaping capture.
Marcus Annaeus Lucanus, or Lucan (lived 39-65 A.D.), has a brief account of it in his epic poem Civil War. 2600:8800:700C:5400:B1C2:15DB:C872:AE61 (talk) 00:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pillars of Pompey
Talk:Sinus rhythm

message: The article states "There are typically four distinct waves (identified by the letters P, Q, R, S, and T)", shouldn't this be five?
:Apparently (http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft9w1009p7&chunk.id=0&doc.view=print, and others).  The history of the article also shows five in the past.  So back it goes.  mdf 13:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Normal Sinus Rhythm
P wave is caused by breathing.
QRS wave is caused by inhaling.
T wave is caused by constant motion.
: Moved here becuase ... what on earth does this mean? Also link seems to not work kylet 10:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What causes the waves?

message: Dictionary:Sinus Rhyth74.34.185.129 (talk) 02:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cardiac Rhythm Rate

message: Can we get some citations for this section. For example, are these criteria provided by WHO, American Medical Association, etc. Additionally, the 1. 1., 2. 2. looks silly. 137.73.10.159 (talk) 15:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sinus rhythm on ECG
Talk:Catch Us If You Can (film)

message: This sentence seems to stray into opinion, and away from Neutral Point of View: "Dave Clark had actually worked as a stuntman on a number of films, which might explain how, despite his rather wooden acting, his camera-sense is vastly superior to that of any of The Beatles in A Hard Day's Night."  "Vastly superior" seems to be more appropriate coming from a Dave Clark Five fan, rather than from a neutral party. Itsfullofstars 08:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jemini

message: Jemini were originally a trio by the name of 'Tricity' (i.e. Tri = 3) from the "City" (Liverpool).  Recorded a number of demos at Lomax Entertainments studios, Great Crosshall Street, Liverpool in 2002.  'Cry Baby' was written by Martin Isherwood, Head of Music at Liverpool Institute for Performing Arts
:The band were named after a fridge, not due to the reason given above. See Nul Points (2006) () by Tim Moore. TomPhil 18:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're wrong. Gemini was a different band to the Jemini in Eurovision. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 14:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

text: The stageshow was about two men pretending to be the best dancers in the world. They were also pretending as if cameras were just invented. Then I discovered there was a woman on stage singing. Plainly awful at it's own merit. I agree with User:Wozocoxonoy that the Iraq comment is living outside it's context. I for one will say two things: The Iraq issue seems like romantic drivle. Two: The British tabloids act as if 2003 never happened, calling electro-velvet Britains worst entry. --2001:4644:DC5B:0:E833:7161:5B50:3059 (talk) 20:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

text: OK, I've put some more information in from Tim Moore's interview with the duo in his book Nul Points. The source for all the information added in my previous edit is that book. TomPhil 18:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Video games in Germany

message: How come there's no German article? Or am I missing something? -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Source -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 06:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  German article? 

message: Hi, perhaps a section on hardware (made/designed in Germany) could be included here. Infineon is relevant in chip technology, and firms like Roccat in manual devices. Cheers, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 11:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardware 

message: Am I the only one uncomfortable with the framing of video gaming in this article? As in most other "Video gaming in..." articles, it's not really about the gaming, it's about industries (production, sales, perhaps consumption) and sometimes about bans or censorship, but not about the actual gaming as in people playing videogames. I would suggest splitting the stubs into articles with titles that match the content such as "German video game market", "German video game industry" and so on. Or perhaps finding real content about gaming: player demographics, competitions and lans, local game history and culture... Grbr (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video gaming 

message: Some important media like GameStar, PC Games, Computerbild Spiele, GamesWirtschaft etc. should be included here. -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 14:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media 