lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Niyoga

message: Swadhyayee, without starting a controversy, I want to ask you the source of this claim. I am glad that you are looking at my contributions and trying to contribute there as well. But this "ghee stuff" I have not read at all anywhere. Thanks. --Apandey 10:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bodies covered by ghee

message: The word Hindu is not quite precise, and has no definite meaning. 
Which caste did practise this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.97.3.202 (talk) 00:30, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which caste? 

message: Sacred texts dot com is not Reliable source to write Wikipedia article. Please provide RS to add content. — Harshil want to talk? 09:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: OR is not allowed.-- Harshil want to talk? 10:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is what I am talking about. . This person removes every edit I made againsr him. Says provide relible source like he is obsessed with reliable source. I am Clearly citing manusmriti one of mythological text of Hinduism and he is in constant denial mode. Same thing is happening in Payal Rohatgi page where he is removing her controversies which I am adding with proper citation but he keep removing it. Same on The Wire wiki page where he is using defaming tactics on liberal news portals of India. Thank you.Edward Zigma (talk) 10:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: (responding to ping), At first, both of you please read and strictly follow WP:BRD and WP:STATUSQUO. I reckon it will really help both of you. User:Harshil169 on what basis are you claiming that this site is not reliable ? Do you have an example where it is unreliable ? or did you just assume it ? As Edward Zigma stated this content is sourced from Manusmriti. So Manusmriti is the source here. The site sacredtext here should be considered as an online Archive/mirror site for the actual source Manusmriti. Harshil, if your only objections is on the site, and nothing else then you should probably allow this content to be added into the article. Edward Zigma I am sure there will be many books on Manusmriti as well which you can add in addition to the sacredtext site.--DBigXrayᗙ 12:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sacred texts is using books which have been thoroughly rejected by consensus on WT:Hinduism. Also, this content was added by one anonymous IP. I removed it, Zigma reinserted and keep reverting. — Harshil want to talk? 12:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacred texts is not RS. 

message: The article may have several issues, including content and source mismatches. For example this claim is a copy-paste and the source was also not properly cited. It should be volume III of the Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophy. Furthermore in the source, the word "Niyoga" may have been used in a different sense. I believe the article may have some copy-edit issues as well. Thanks, — Satnam2408(talk) 09:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the relevant quote -— Satnam2408(talk) 10:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues
Talk:Thomas the Obscure

message: Isn't the title rather more obviously a reference to, er, Thomas Hardy, who wrote Jude the Obscure? john k (talk) 01:19, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  title?
Talk:Tommy's Tale

message: I've marked as reviewed- this has four reviews from The Guardian, Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, and Entertainment Weekly. Some of the reviews lean on the shorter side and borderline WP:SIGCOV, but they are definitely WP:RS and independent. Therefore, IMO WP:GNG/WP:NBOOK criteria 1 is met. If anyone disagrees feel free to take this to AfD. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 05:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: I added the refs in the "lede" of the stub and removed the minor film trivia. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 05:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Venus Prime

message: This article is missing some vital information, most notably any reference to years of publication. 23skidoo 06:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More information needed

message: The synopsis section begins with the explantion "Some of these have been taken from the book descriptions available on Amazon. Parts of the descriptions have been removed, as they are the same for all books."
This is completely true. The editor coped the descriptions from Amazon. This is a copyright violation. I have requested deletion of the violation, which will take the article back to September 23, 2006, prior to this edit. Actually, the only meaningful material we are losing (other than the descriptions) is a list of characters. There are no sources given for anything.
Additionally, there is no indication this series is notable. We'll have to get to that. - SummerPhDv2.0 17:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Bast fibre

message: This article says that bast comes from Phloem.
The cross-section diagram in Ground tissue suggests that Sclerenchyma is where bast fibre comes from.  The article on Phloem does not list bast.
DHR (talk) 01:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phloem or Sclerenchyma? 

message: Fiber atlas By Marja-Sisko Ilvessalo-Pfäffli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pschemp (talk • contribs) 18:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey look, a SOURCE
Talk:Bandar Lengeh County

message: Brightkingdom (talk) 20:25, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution for 2016 administrative divisions and their populations
Talk:Sterling (marque)

message: I've left this article alone until the merger discussion is over, but wherever it ends up, I think the following should be removed:
: ...they are mechanically almost identical to the Acura Legend.
– in my experience this isn't really true. A large number of ancilliary components are frustratingly different, especially in the interior, and with regard to the engine, depending on the choice of engine, some major differences crept in. I know, because I've got one, and since the demise of Rover, my local Honda dealer has been very sympathetic... but completely unable to supply parts. Not that it's needed many :-) – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 11:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

message: A few corrections were needed for the article.  The cars were marketed by Austin-Rover Cars of North America LLC.  Although the decision to withdraw the car line was made in 1991, a few 1992 models were sold here.  Cars were originally marketed in 825 S (NOT L!) and 825 SL form; I have an 1987  825 S.  The 825 S came with a manual transmission standard.  Only 4 options were available including automatic transmission, ABS and metallic paint - all of which were standard on the 825 SL.  You could order an 825 SL in manual form, although I have never seen one.  SL models also received a nicer set of alloy wheels.  The 827 SL and SLi models had a larger 2.7 litre Honda V-6.  I believe the 825 SL was actually the notchback body again.  Second series cars (facelifted, including a Sterling coupé) not sold here.  Mechanically cars are a combination of Honda drivetrain and Rover parts.  Some parts still available in England through specialists.  If maintained, cars are actually quite reliable.  The success of the Land-Rover brand caused Rover to drop its car line here, probably a mistake.Paws4me 17:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Coupé was called the Vitesse.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.44.199 (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sterling cars
Talk:Doxa

message: Good work Bjerke. I don't know how your Greek is, but I would very much like if you said something about the sense of 'doxa' as 'appearance' or 'seeming'. This is philosophically relevant, in Parmenides (his way of doxa) and, I believe in Plato. I'd love to know when it means appearances and if this sense implies belief. Dast 19:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearances

message: Shouldn't there be a mention of doxa/doxic as used by Barthes? Considering he was quite influential in continental philosopy a small mention of him would be appropriate. Khawaga (talk) 10:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The use of "doxa" in semiology

message: What in the world does 'elderlose rhetors' mean?  I looked it up in Yahoo.  All I see is that it is used over and again by people who are just copying what someone else wrote... specifically this article.  A rhetor is a teacher of rhetoric.  But what is an elderlose rhetor? I see no reason to think that it means anything at all.  
--Sophroniscus (talk) 04:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems clearly an error introduced long ago.  I recommend reverting it to the earlier version: "elder" Metajon (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: elderlose rhetors

message: Hello! I'm a student looking to fulfill a Wikipedia project at my university. I wish to add more information regarding Plato's and Aristotle's conflicting views of doxa. JedSmith19 (talk) 03:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The Relevance of further knowledge
Talk:South Bedfordshire

message: The statistics for the area and population of the district are exactly the same as those for the Mid Bedfordshire district. Is this correct? If not, could the one in error be corrected, please. --Oldontarian (talk) 10:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area and Population
Talk:Mid Bedfordshire District

message: The statistics for the area and population of the district are exactly the same as those for the South Bedfordshire district. Is this correct? If not, could the one in error be corrected, please. --Oldontarian (talk) 10:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area and Population 
Talk:Nina Jacobson

message: I know this is not fully correct, because in 1991 I interviewed for a position as Jacobson's assistant at Disney. She was the head of Buena Vista Pictures, Inc which was company that Disney used to acquire movies that had not been made with guild contracts. 76.95.33.253 (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology Needs Work
Talk:.lproj

message: There is another article (a stub, though) at Lproj. 128.158.145.51 16:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged these a while back – apologies, should've left a note here — alex.muller (talk • edits) 21:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another stub 

message: Okay, I just merged .Iproj to Application Bundle.  I also marked .Iproj for speedy deletion.  ~~Awsome EBE123 talkContribs 19:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected instead to preserve page history. Airplaneman  ✈ 20:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and delete
Template talk:Infobox computer hardware

message: I think there's a fundamental problem with having the "connects to" line in many instances of this infobox.  Many of the instances where this has been used either cause misleading or incorrect text.  For example, saying that RAM connects to a motherboard via a socket is only true some of the time.  Quite often, RAM modules are reflow-soldered directly to a board, and what's more, the notion of a motherboard doesn't necessarily apply to all computers.  Similar scenarios exist for the video card and network card instances, which provide a very PC-centric view of the devices and ignore the fact that their functions can either be integrated entirely or almost entirely onto one large board, or even one IC package.  Please be careful not to use this infobox in such a way that provides an overly PC-centric view.  Computers are implemented in many more ways than a desktop PC. -- mattb @ 2006-10-11T18:01Z
:: You make a very good point. Sadly this can not be governed by the infobox itself, they havent developed ParserFunctions to be that good (yet...) I will alter the small note at the bottom of the box to recognise the fact that these are only common configurations --TheJosh 07:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connects to? 

message: We do not need the "200px" on the 200px.  Does that sound right?  We should use "thumbnail" instead to make the thumbnail use the user-preferences size.  Example:  thumbnail.  I'll go ahead and make the change if nobody cares.  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The 200px makes the image always be small enough to fit in the box. If the user has their thumbnail size set to 350px, then the box will blow out and become quite huge. --TheJosh (talk) 23:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  200px 

message: The IT link brings to "Stampante" (printer), to be corrected. Thanks --FabC (talk) 05:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Italian link  

message: There is no guidance as to the meaning of the parameter "Introduced."  IMO in should mean "introduced to the public" which could be announcement or first production shipment which ever came first but it could mean beta shipment or general availability or some combination of these.  A recent dispute with  highlights the problem and resulted in the parameter not being included.  I propose adding guidance here as a change to the Parameter table in the form of:
:introduced
::Earliest of public announcement date or first production shipment date expressed in   
Comments? Tom94022 (talk) 19:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of "Introduced"
Talk:Featherstone, Staffordshire

message: Because of it's bad reputation it's nicknames should be include such as Trampsville and FeatherstonED  in other words the youths there make it a rubbish place to be.
p.s if you live there... run... run and don't stop running! :-) Jonoridge (talk) 14:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname
Talk:Le gendarme en balade

message: I couldn't help but notice that the plot given for this movie was wrong. So I took the liberty of changing it to the right synopsis.82.120.243.42 (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes in the Plot Section
Talk:Garde à Vue

message: According to MOS:FRENCHCAPS, this article ought to be moved back to Garde à vue. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Rock garden

message: A naturalistic rockery in England... NATURALISTIC??????????
: Yes, naturalistic. What I meant by this, and what most landscape architects would understand by it, is that the rockery is built to look like a natural rock outcrop with a bedding plane. The alternative form for a rockery is where the stones are placed without any attempt to appear part of an underlying geological formation. This is valid for a garden, but it is not naturalistic.
:By all means edit what I wrote in the article. We are here to co-operate in making improvements. Chris Jefferies 11:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Route 9 (Hong Kong)

message: What surprises me is that the Highways Department integrated so many unrelated expressways in the New Territories to make one giant ring road.
Shouldn't at least ONE route be considered the "interstate" route, where it is supposed to stretch all the way from Hong Kong Island to the border crossing in Lok Ma Chau, and eventually extending to, say Guangzhou?
The usage of a circular road in the New Territories just shows how narrow-minded the government is with regards to cross-border travel. (At least in my opinion.) Does anyone have any opinion of this arrangement?--Kylohk 11:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Route 9 a circular road?
Talk:Le trio en mi bémol

message: I don't know how to edit this, so I'm creating a new talk section instead. 
The name of the play is "le trio en mi bémol", not "si". 
Is the only solution to create a new article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stoutjulien (talk • contribs) 17:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Moving a page. I moved it today. Greets Magiers (talk) 13:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Internet Systems Consortium

message: The 0-day market blurb from 10 Jan looks odd. Here's hoping for time to look into it. DanConnolly (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the formulation of the paragraph doesn't seem impartial. Neználek (talk) 08:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

text: Full disclosure: I have worked for CZ.NIC and I am now working for ISC. I have removed the formulation, because it is simply not true and it is a targeted attack at ISC.  Many of the open-source software vendors provide early security notifications for contractual customers, such as:
* CZ.NIC Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/support/) and BIRD (http://bird.network.cz/?support)
* NLNetLab's NSD (https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/nsd/support.html)
* NGINX via NGINX Plus Programme (https://www.nginx.com/support/)
* MariaDB (https://mariadb.com/pricing)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oerdnj (talk • contribs) 14:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The orphan article ISC license should be deleted or expanded or merged in here. Gronky 12:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I expanded it a bit, and added a link to it from the BSD licenses article. I don't agree with deleting the ISC license article or merging it into this one, as they seem pretty distinct to me. Neilc 19:30, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ISC license article

message: The article is missing what the ISC currently involves itself in. The ISC currently provides commercial dns resolutions to those that can afford to pay for it.
The ISC also employs or has members in a decision making capacity for which are sympathetic to corporate interest making them appear to have a bias and to be in a position of great power considering they maintain a root server and own bind.
I wanted to add a few things to the article since it has less information then most web hosting companies do.Woods01 (talk) 08:07, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ISC's role on the internet
Talk:Nadhmi Auchi

message: There are some detailed and juicy biographical details in this article, and we don't believe a blessed word of it. The sources are extremely thin compared to what is conveyed here. His "Personal Life" section cites a source that is 31 words long. Nowhere can we find an "Assyrian" designation for his ethnoreligious heritage, much less Chaldean Catholic. We guess he's Catholic, look at all those awards he got? We suppose we will delve deeper into these mysteries when it isn't time to prepare lunch, but it looks pretty grim right now, not gonna lie. Elizium23 (talk) 19:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? Seriously?
Talk:Man of La Mancha (film)

message: The comment in this article that Peter O'Toole's singing was dubbed in, while all the other actors did their own singing is inconsistent with the comment in the Julie Gregg article that says: "She was one of the few members of the film's cast who had a legitimate singing voice."  Which is it?  One of the articles should be fixed.   Jlawniczak (talk) 03:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not contradictory.  The cast was full of non-singers.  One of them (O'Toole) was dubbed (though they took care (?) not to hire too good a voice for him), but other non-singers (e.g., Loren and Coco) were allowed to sing anyway. Additionally, a few supporting players who could sing did so. It's a hell of a way to film a great stage musical. WHPratt (talk) 15:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Kedukan Bukit inscription

message: The inscription seems to be in two different languages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.246.75 (talk) 11:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A good deal of borrowing from Sanskrit is there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.200.136 (talk) 08:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake 

message: "DUA LAKSA" and "DUA PULAUH RIBU" both mean 20,000 , not 2,000 Giladzuc (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 

message: Pallava script is a precursor to Tamil script. It cannot be named Tamil Pallava script right. Tamil script derived from Pallava script used for Tamil and Grantha which is similarly derived from Pallava and closely related with Tamil script with the addition of word for certain sounds used for Sanskrit. Similarly this incription uses Pallava script to write old malay. Writing it as Tamil Pallava is contraindication.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.101.156.113 (talk) 09:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pallava script and Tamil script
Talk:Transparent bridge

message: Can any one give detailed description about why bridging is used in 802.16(WiMax).
I think this page has no extra value than the article about network bridging, other than the word 'transparent'.
Maybe this article should be merged into the article about network bridging  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.165.163.122 (talk) 14:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I suggest merging this article either into bridging (networking) or network switch.  So there are 4 voting options:
# Merge to bridging (networking),
# Merge to network switch,
# Oppose merge or
# Neutral.
69.140.152.55 (talk) 06:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge options
Talk:Eugène-Anatole Demarçay

message: Surely the second part of his given name is Anatole, not Antole.  JackofOz 12:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:ISC license

message: Does anyone have a link to a copy of this licence? Gronky 12:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the licence? 

message: I realize this isn't a big deal, but why bother renaming this to "licence"? The vast majority of the software license pages are spelled using "license"; Google hits for "ISC license" outnumber hits for "ISC licence" by more than 10 to 1 (even including the Google hits that reference the WP article itself or the various mirrors of it). Just because the article was originally created with "licence" is no reason it can't be changed. As for policy, it does say that a certain spelling variant should be preferred if "an article's subject has a strong tie to a specific region/dialect, it should use that dialect." Now that isn't quite the case here, but the ISC are an American corporation. They authored the license, so I think it only makes sense to spell it with an "s". Neilc 02:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did someone rename it to "licence"?  The article should be the same as the licence's actual name.  If that's the USA spelling, fine, if it's the commonwealth spelling, fine.  Can you provide a link (preferably to the licence itself) showing which name is correct? Gronky 11:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was originally "licence"; I renamed it to "license" for the reasons discussed above, and User:Janizary renamed it back to "licence". As for an official link, there's a copy of the license in the OpenBSD CVS tree. The filename and preamble use "license", but the license text itself doesn't have the word. A cursory look at the Google results doesn't show an "official"-looking copy at the ISC itself. The license isn't included in the FSF or OSI lists of open source licenses, perhaps because it is too similar to the BSD/MIT. Neilc 16:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that the licence doesn't have an official name then, so the article title is descriptive, and both spellings are permitted.  In this case, the first spelling used is what should stay - because there's no acceptable grounds for changing the name, and because dialect activism/wars are not acceptable (it's in the policy somewhere). Gronky 20:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We should stick with the article's original name, because the license itself does not have a name in the text, not unlike other simple permissive licenses. --Evice (talk) 21:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

text: The ISC and OSI now have copies of the license on their sites here and here They both use the American spelling. Vincent Damewood (talk) 22:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: The licence was originally written by the Internet Software Consortium, not the Internet Systems Consortium. It is a bit deceptive to only mention Internet Systems Consortium, when this is not what ISC in the licence name stands for.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torpcoms (talk • contribs) 18:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet Software Consortium vs Internet Systems Consortium