lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Superreal number

message: Yes, I agree that this article lacks sufficient context, and I've made the barest, feeblest attempt to rectify this but I'm not really an expert.
Also I did have one specific question:
"The quotient field F of A is a superreal field "
Quotient of A by what?  We started with a Tychonoff space X, 
got the algebra of continuous real-valued functions, C(X)
identified P, a prime ideal in this algebra 
and formed A, the factor algebra of C(X)/P
What are we modding out by in the next step? F = A/<what>
Zero sharp 00:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing; we're taking the field of fractions of A.Ben Standeven (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: The text says: The quotient field F of A is a superreal field if F strictly contains the real numbers , so that F is not order isomorphic to , though they may be isomorphic as fields.. Duh? I don't think this is possible: if F is algebraically isomorphic to R, then we can define positive or negative numbers of F using the existence or non-existence of the square root, etc. Albmont (talk) 14:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, good point.Ben Standeven (talk) 06:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algebraically isomorphic to R but not order isomorphic to R? 

message: The relation to Edwin Hewitt's paper should be clarified: Hewitt, Edwin (1948) Rings of real-valued continuous functions. I. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 64, 45--99.  On page 74, Hewitt defined the hyper-real field.  His construction is very similar to what is described here.   Tkuvho (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hewitt 

message: The title is somewhat confusing. 
First, the article of Dales and Woodin talks about "super-real fields" with a dash.
Second, though one could say that a super-real number is an element of a super-real field, this is bad phrasing (just like saying that a ring-number is an element of a ring would be bad phrasing), and it would make more sense to directly talk about super-real fields.
This avoids a further confusion in the introduction when "The field of superreal numbers" is mentioned as though it were one specific super-real field. Vincent Bagayoko (talk) 23:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change? 

message: The term algebra here seems ambiguous. At least, ambiguous enough to warrant further clarification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:281:8000:FE0:B85E:C6F5:68A0:25EC (talk) 23:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand upon "the algebra of continuous real-valued functions"
Talk:Fishtail parka

message: * Merge, Parka, Anorak, Fishtail parka and Snorkel parka. As a purist I would actually like to see Parka and Anorak seperated as they are entirely different concepts and have wildly differeent historical origins but I realise that all of these terms are now so confused and interchangeable the only way to make sense of them is to put them all together and make the differences clear there in one place.  Ex nihil (talk) 00:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Fungiform papilla

message: can you numb the tounge so all tasts buds a numb ?
Both the lingual nerves (branch of mandibular division of V) (which carry the taste fibers of chorda tempani, branch of VII) need to be anesthetized to numb the taste buds on anterior 2/3rd of the tongue. Quite easily done by using local anesthesia at the appropriate site. Taste buds in other areas of the oral cavity, including the posterior 1/3rd of the tongue are more difficult to anesthetize (Glossopharyngeal nerve).Contemptuous 10:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 17:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]
Talk:Pink robin

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Petroica rodinogaster.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 11, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-07-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 16:21, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Petroica rodinogaster.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Rose robin

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Rose Robin 1 - Woodford.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 21, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-10-21. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 12:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Hannah Montana: Spotlight World Tour

message: Why does the table on the side say it's a Gamecube Disk? It should say Wii Optical Disk.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.194.15 (talk) 14:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know the exact relaese date for the game because it says in the article that it will be released on the 30th of October but it says on the profile under the game picture that it will be realeased on 23rd of October???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simsimtigger (talk • contribs) 21:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date
Talk:Swallow-tailed cotinga

message: 
* :Swallow-tailed Cotinga → 
* :White-bellied Erpornis → 
* :Crested Bellbird → 
* :Sooty Shrikethrush → 
* :Australian Magpie → 
– Invert the redirections as the consensus and guidelines recommend not to capitalise the common (vernacular) names of species. See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Bird common name decapitalisation and Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Animals, plants, and other organisms. Coreyemotela (talk) 20:39, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested moves
File talk:CloudShadows.jpeg

message: The license tag for this image is incorrect.  It cites copyright expiration after the life of author plus 100 years.  Homer died in 1910 according to the article, yet this is only 2007.  I'm not sufficiently versed in copyright conditions for paintings or I would correct the tag or nominate for deletion myself.  Can anyone else offer better expertise?  Ipoellet 00:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Crossbows and Catapults

message: I know, it's just a start though. Need to take some pictures of my set (consists of 3 different revisions) and try to dig up more info on who published it when. Also need to find the rules to get a better description of the gameplay. When I was a kid it was just fire till you knocked the other guy's castle down. WNW3 00:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Pretty 

message: Need redirects for "Crossbows & Catapults", "Crossbows And Catapults", "Barbarernas sista kamp", "Battlegrounds Crossbows and Catapults", "Battlegrounds Crossbows And Catapults", "Battlegrounds Crossbows & Catapults", and "Battlegrounds" I think. Not sure how to do that or if the upper/lower case are important. WNW3 18:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Candcsets.jpg
Not sure how to attach it. I am planning on taking some more but I need to identify what is really needed WNW3 (talk) 19:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A mere 6 years later, the image is added! (Sorry for the delay, C&C is clearly not a page that gets a lot of attention.) Anyone who has sets around, suggestions for photographs that might be good additions: photo of a game midway through play; photo of game after initial setup; photo of the components that came in a single release, lined up to show what they look like and how many there are. — Alan De Smet | Talk 16:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: * 2 bases (1 of each color)
* 2 towers (1 of each color)
* 24 bricks, (12 of each color)
* 20 discs (10 of each color )
* 8 warriors (4 of each color)
* 10 flags (5 of each color)
* 2 catapults (1 of each color)
* 2 crossbows (1 of each color)
* one set of photocopied instructions
198.6.46.11 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lakeside set from 1983 contents 

message: https://www.polygon.com/tabletop-games/22567294/crossbows-catapults-reboot-restoration-games-heroquest-steve-baker-kickstarter-release-date-price
24.22.126.82 (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another reboot coming
Talk:Sociable weaver

message: I'm not sure if it's worth mentioning the other species that have "social weaver" in their name. They are listed on that link, which is a disambiguation page. Agyle (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention other species with "social weavers" in names? 

message: The sentence says "The nests consist of separate chambers, each of which is occupied by a pair (sometimes with offspring) roost and breed." Seems to be missing a verb, but since I know very little about birds, I'm not sure how to best correct it. Kkved (talk) 23:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs correction:  1st sentence, 2 paragraph under "Nesting"  

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Sociable weaver (Philetairus socius).jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 24, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-10-24. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 12:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Finch Avenue

message: In central Toronto, I believe Finch to have been a "sideroad" and not a concession road. South of Eglinton concession roads ran E-W. North of Eglinton is on a different survey, and concessions run in a S-N direction. Looking at the 1878 map, you can see the concession numbers clearly. Finch is the sideroad between lots 20 and 21 York Township. https://digital.library.mcgill.ca/countyatlas/Images/Maps/TownshipMaps/yor-m-york-n.jpg Feldercarb (talk) 03:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Persistence hunting

message: Did persistence hunting ever play a role in human evolution? 209.122.140.41 (talk) 04:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persistence Hunting and Human Evolution 

message: Should this article also include instances of persistence hunting practiced by early humans, as well as San Bushmen of the Kalahari desert and the kudu they often hunt?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.122.140.41 (talk) 03:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Humans, Bushmen, and Kudu 

message: The relevant article makes no reference at all to persistence hunting. Noliscient (talk) 12:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are Hadza people a good example ? 

message: Like a few days or more? 109.176.30.112 (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much time the president hunting take?
Talk:FoxyTunes

message: Most of the 'unix' players listed are primarily used on linux, surely this section should be altered to "linux" or "unix/linux"
92.237.136.171 (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know much about it, but if you think so, then be bold and go ahead and change it. --Mike | Contrib 02:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unix/Linux

message: I don't know whether this would be a good idea, but maybe in the External Links there should be a link to a list of review sites  generated by Google? Something like this?  Or mabey replace Yahoo! with Google?
===External links (Example)===
* Google list of FoxyTunes Reviews
Webdog1000 01:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review List

message: * Google list of FoxyTunes Reviews
Webdog1000 01:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links (Example)

message: This article reads like an ad: features are listed, but no criticism, bugs, public reception, etc. This article reads like it was written by a sock-puppet. It's all pros, no cons. I'm nominating it non-NPOV. Durty Willy 16:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement? Neutrality in question... 

message: it was working with 9.1 but not with 10.0
--Wjmdem (talk) 20:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  firefox 10.0 
Talk:Everything bagel

message: Article would be better placed as a subsection of bagel. --Bk0 (Talk) 01:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Aren't these bagels also called "every seed" bagels? Or is that something different?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.115.232.150 (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Name
Talk:Bennington, Vermont

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support per nom. Raime 04:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The Battle of Bennington was fought on August 16, 1777. The battle was actually fought in Waloomsac a village in the town of Hoosick New York just over the line and the battle field is a new york historic site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raime (talk • contribs) 02:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Bennington 

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 02:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Cities assessor
Talk:Samuel E. Anderson

message: This article includes indication that text in the article is copied from a given source.  Whether or not that source is public domain, any material copied needs to be put in quotes and properly referenced with in-line footnote references.  Otherwise, it makes separating wikipedia editor work based on other sources, and editor rewordings, inseparable from text that is merely copied.  Sincerely, doncram (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied text in article
Talk:Red-capped manakin

message: The video linked of the mating manakin is clearly manipulated, and so should not be linked from this article. How can you tell the video is manipulated? The bird fades away at 0:46, leaving the background unchanged. So clearly some computer manipulation was involved.
I'm removing the link. — Sam 63.138.152.238 (talk) 17:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bar-bellied pitta

message: Nothing at Flickr. Richard001 (talk) 09:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Jews of Iran (film)

message: This article does not seem to be dedicated to providing information about the film. Instead it is clearly written by someone that is more interested in spreading lies about Iranians. Why is this article still on wikipedia in this form? We are about to witness an attack on the country of Iran, possibly in the next few weeks, and this forum should not be used as a tool for supporting such a thing. I would like to know what is needed for removing this article and forcing the author to replace it with a proper article that addresses the subject it claims to.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.24.102.221 (talk) 10:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Propaganda?

message: I've removed a chunk of text under the Production section lifted from an interview  which appears to be under copyright. It needs rewriting to just use brief excerpts from the director's comments. Espresso Addict 02:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: This article was possibly written by someone to whom English is not their vernacular. I will fix some of these mistakes; but I exhort others to proofread, for this article is on the main page.ChristophMartel 08:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: The infobox states that the film was released on September 11, 1961.  Given that it's a 2005 film, this seems like vandalism to me.  --Micahbrwn 14:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Mangrove pitta

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Pitta megarhyncha 1 - Singapore.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 25, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-04-25. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Pitta megarhyncha 1 - Singapore.jpg scheduled for POTD
Talk:The Goon Show running jokes

message: This article brings up a problem with referencing information gleaned from a primary source, in this case by listening to The Good Show.  The reference is The Good Show, and all of us who have listened to The Good Show know that this article does an excellent and careful job of reporting what went out over the air.  Would a secondary reference be preferable?  Required?
Rick Norwood 14:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why didn't you wish to know that. 

message: I hate doing this, because I think the proliferation of badges on WP is a sign of extremely lazy editing. (If you have the time to add a badge, then you have the time to resolve the issue the badge refers to.  Be bold.) OTOH, while neither of the badges currently attached to this article are appropriate, the one I'm adding is.  Mind you, I don't see the harm in "quote farms," because I feel they have value -- but that's current WP policy, image-oriented rather than content-oriented though it may be.Hal (talk) 21:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Making the badge appropriate

message: "This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may only interest a specific audience."  Really?  And that would be distinguished from any other encyclopedic article, print or online, just how, exactly?  We are told to assume good faith, but a badge this nebulously phrased should probably be eliminated as policy.
Even within that in mind, though, it's still completely inappropriate.  Clicking through to the policy page page involved, we see the template should be used to flag articles that are:
1. Plot-only description of fictional works. 
2. Lyrics databases. 
3. Excessive listing of statistics.
4. News reports. 
5. Who's who. (Horribly ungrammatical.  It should be, "Who's whom.")
: Who's whom? Please to be identifying the direct object in that sentence... Safebreaker (talk) 05:40, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "who's who" = "who is who"; verb "to be" takes nominative.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:11, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Slap-happy badge mania

message: I seem to recall frequent comments of it being someone's "turn in the barrel" -  a reference to a decidedly dirty joke. Roger Bunting (talk) 19:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turn in the barrel
Talk:Blue-winged pitta

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Pitta moluccensis - Kaeng Krachan.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 27, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-08-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:19, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Beautiful! I saw some corrections were needed but hit an edit conflict as someone else had jumped on it. I guess I can see a need for an "In use" template. Otr500 (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of the day 

message: Section is just a full on copy/paste of the cited reference, which is pretty dissapointing. "Breeds at different times" is as vague as just saying "This bird breeds". Needs a clear up, so I shall delve into the sources a bit.
Man Over-bored (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha-ha-- I see what you mean. Clean it up! I have never like copy paste even though some have stated it is alright in some instances. I am sure I make mistakes but I strive for a 100% no copy/paste on anything more than a word or two. I have seen this a lot in projects (not birds yet as I haven't looked) where "getting the stub made" seems to be the norm. It is not a bad thing to get coverage but plagiarism is not cool and depending on the site I am sure can be copy/vio. I haven't dug into the article but you will be a hero-for-a-day for improving an article from 2007. Otr500 (talk) 00:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Otr500, would you take a look now at the Breeding section and tell us whether it's still a copyvio?  I appreciate your opinion and input.  Thanks!  108.56.199.37 (talk) 02:17, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  @108.56.199.37 much much better, two thumbs up Man Over-bored (talk) 07:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, M O-b.  (Didn't mean to exclude you.)  108.56.199.37 (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No biggy, have a good one Man Over-bored (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

text: I didn't see any problems there. Otr500 (talk) 00:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Breeding
Talk:Rusty-naped pitta

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Pitta oatesi male and female - Mae Wong.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 27, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-06-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Pitta oatesi male and female - Mae Wong.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Azure-breasted pitta

message: There is one photo, which I have requested. Richard001 (talk) 04:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flickr 
Talk:Noisy pitta

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=ZF8suAAACAAJ&dq=%22Noisy+Pitta%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bpXLUMfDKOmwyQHcxoDgCw&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAg
Best of luck, ClaudeReigns (talk) 21:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Reference

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Pitta versicolor - Kembla Heights.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 24, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-03-24. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Pitta versicolor - Kembla Heights.jpg scheduled for POTD