lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Superior (proposed U.S. state)

message: unsourced statement about 906/616 area code split should be either sourced or removed.  Edward Vielmetti (talk) 01:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: indeed this split passes without comment at http://www.areacode-info.com/!history/1960s.htm which suggests that the 906 code was part of a gradual fine tuning of the whole North American Numbering Plan. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 01:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[area code 906]] 

message: I don't know if the statement that there is no active state movement is true now as it was in 2012. I do know I keep getting ads for a Facebook group (https://www.facebook.com/StateofSuperior), but I don't think that alone can establish notability (as far as being verifiable through an independent, reliable source). Does anyone know if this group has achieved discussion in a newsworthy medium? -- JeffBillman (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @JeffBillman Not nearly, no. Most of this talk is in smaller groups complaining and no intent to push the movement further. Archigan (talk) 00:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No active movement?
Talk:Sufyan al-Thawri

message: I added context to his political views and gave context with an academic source and the primary source. Cluebot did a false positive  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cathylinch1997 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally don't think it's vandalism, but I don't know a lot about this topic. Just be sure to proofread prior, please. Squeeyote (talk) 23:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: I have not done vandalism

message: I noticed upon reading this article that a large portion on tasawwuf was copied and pasted from a book, claiming that Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzia and Ibn Jawzi both were reported to have quoted Sufyan ath-Thawri as praising the Sufis, in the books Madarij as-Salikeen and Sifat as-Safwa respecticely.  Upon checking both books in their entirety - I have both transcribed word for word in the original Arabic in Word documents - I found that the quote was a fabrication and not in either book.  For example, the quote of ath-Thawri from Ibn al-Jawzi in regard to Abu Hashim says:
قال أبو نعيم الحافظ أبو هاشم من قدماء زهاد بغداد ومن أقران أبي عبد الله البراثي وبلغني أن سفيان الثوري جلس إليه وقال ما زلت آرائي وأنا لا أشعر حتى جالست أبا هاشم فأخذت منه ترك الرثاء.
And we can see clearly that the word "Sufi" or "tasawwuf" doesn't even appear in their.MezzoMezzo 21:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy paste issues

message: I am wondering why person(s) keep claiming he is Shia. He is most definitely not! Even if he was, a valid reference is needed. Thus, I will now undo the revision - please avoid edit war, if you have proof he was Shia, please bring it here :) Thanks ServantofAllah93 (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT Shia

message: I've read a couple of narrations about Sufyan at-Thawri and none of them labels him a sufi. There is a difference between an ascetic (az-zuhd) and a sufi, just as Imam Ibn Al-Jawzi pointed out in his book, Talbis Iblis. The reference used to label him as a sufi here, the book by Abu Nu'aym, has been denounced as spurious. See to this, whoever is in charge.
Waliyullah Tunde (talk) 14:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Sufi
Talk:Aluminum piano plate

message: I removed a bunch of stuff about the development of Alcoa and duraluminum, and if the bit about Winter was moved to its own page this article would seem better named "Aluminum musical instruments". - Mireut 18:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I have a Yamaha created during WWII that uses an aluminum plate rather than cast iron/steel. I think this was probably done out of convenience (due to the war). The date of manufacture is 1943. Should Yamaha be credited for aluminum piano plates too? StandardPotential (talk) 12:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yamaha Aluminum Piano Plate prior to Winter and Company?
Talk:Skyhook (skydiving)

message: I believe the title of this should be one word, "Skyhook" , as it is used on the Relative Workshop website: Harksaw
The WP:Deletion policy does not really describe the difference between a good article and advertising. This article describes the function of a new invention. What makes it "advertising" any more than any other article about a company or product? It is certainly not spam, which seems to be the purpose of the "no advertising" clause in WP:Deletion policy, which mentions "Advertising or other spam"Harksaw 15:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it worth mentioning his prior art in this article? Turkeyphant 00:39, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Hewitt
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Leotolstoy

message: User:Leotolstoy
Category:	3
Image talk:	10
Image:	4
Mainspace	212
Talk:	55
User talk:	5
User:	26
Wikipedia talk:	1
Wikipedia:	9
avg edits per article	3.42
earliest	17:25, 17 July 2006
number of unique articles	95
total	325
Leotolstoy's editcount summary stats as of 17:57, November 6th 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 18:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Floral vocabulary

message: I agree with whomever proposed that this article should be merged into the entry on the language of flowers. Neither is terribly informative without the other, but in combination they'd make a good basic entry on the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.217.252 (talk)  on 6 November 2006
I agree, but before so, i would be better if anyone could make a table of the vocabulary before merging.  Ill try, but no promises. Xlegiofalco 08:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Article Floral vocabulary merged into Language of flowers. -- Myth (Talk) 23:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Larry Smarr

message: Larry Smarr was head of NCSA when the Web took off, in part because of Mosaic. Smarr's role in directing resources to the Mosaic project is underappreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.0.244.109 (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misses his involvement in the Web and Mosaic.
Talk:Lopamudra

message: This personage is categorized as a living person but she seems to be fictional. There are no dates to verify her existence and she seems to be legendary rather that an actual person who lived, breathed and died. Liz Read! Talk! 17:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lopamudra
Talk:Virochana

message: According to Devdutt Pattnaik in his book 7 secrets of Vishnu he mentions that Virochan is killed when he makes a promise to Mohini (Lord Vishnu). When Mohini asks for his head then Virochan holds up his promise and decapitates himself 5.31.8.45 (talk) 12:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death by the hands of Mohini
Talk:Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg

message: Dindigul I. Leoni is a tamil speaker and actor in India. He is very famous for the stage discussion held in tamil language. He is working in St. Mary's higher secondary school, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu as a teacher. His speech are famous because of the humorous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashokkumar1980n (talk • contribs) 18:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dindigul I. Leoni
Talk:Technical University of Munich

message: I tried to add some more infos to this seemingly dormant article.
And I would like to know which parts need verification requested by the template message "needs additional citations for verification"?
Has this been updated since it was first issued in 2017? I can't see any immediate problems with this article and would request to remove this tag. I am happy otherwise to dig through German articles and try to find corresponding english material to back up facts stated here.
--Bernhard Livermore (talk) 20:07, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking very quickly over the article, I see no citations in the history or campus sections, even though there is a lot of content there. I would improve this before removing the tag. Also the article seems WP:UNDERLINKED Aloneinthewild (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for helping out and clearing this up. I believe the biggest chunk of seemingly unverified text is the history part. And it seems that it has mostly been taken by the universities own research on its history (very first source in the history section). Is this as verification not enough? Would it be necessary to find 3rd party sources for each item of that section? I will go ahead and add some links when I find the time. And see if I can dig up some english sources for the history. --Bernhard Livermore (talk) 17:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to fix: "Needs additional citations for verification" for this article?
Talk:University of Oldenburg

message: A year ago the page was renamed to University of Oldenburg without any real discusision or explanation. I propose to revert back since:
#The full name of the University is Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg.
#This name is used in all public documents
#All the other wikipedias use the full name
#We do the same in other universities. Check for example University of Athens that redirects to National and Kapodistrian University of Athens and University of Thessaloniki that redirects to Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
--Magioladitis (talk) 11:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: +1 As it is in the original german page Eldruin (talk) 17:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page back to [[Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg]] 

message: Could someone check  if the number of 18,320 students given on in the info box is accurate? The statistics published on the university’s website seem to state a number of 10,688 students (Studierende). http://uni-oldenburg.de/uni/39372.html (Currently trying to get the facts right for the Oldenburg article.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TurnspitDawg (talk • contribs) 10:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of students
Talk:Temptation Island (TV series)

message: The american series needs it own seperate page and needs to be elaborated.  Also some information about the ratings/reception/viewership should be of note as well.  Also as noted in Bill Carter's 2006 book Desperate Networks (p106) the shows premeire had more viewers than the premeire of CBS's show Survivor (which had 15.5 million viewers in the summer of 2000) its 3rd episode had the most viewers of the season as well.  These high viewership could be alooted to the controversy of the contestants.--Cooly123 00:04, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  American series 

message: The article says, "Patterson and Watson were removed from the show when it was learned by the producers that the pair had children together." That is the only mention of "Watson" on the entire page. 66.241.90.2 (talk) 21:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Watson? 

message: How are the couples/contestants selected? 2600:8800:785:9400:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 17:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  how selected 

message: Are the couples/contestants compensated ?
If so, how ? 2600:8800:785:9400:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 17:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  how compensated
Talk:University of Münster

message: "Westphalian Wilhelms-University?" Wouldn't "Westphalian Wilhelm University" make more sense? The "s" is typical of German to combine two nouns into one word ("Wilhelms-Universität") - but in English?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.133.8.133 (talk) 00:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Please see this orphaned page - Institute for Theological Zoology - is it still part of the University? Can someone not merge this info onto this page? Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Institute for Theological Zoology

message: The article states this: "In a ranking conducted by the École des Mines de Paris, the WWU was ranked as one of the top German universities ". I checked the source and found Muenster University at position 226 and a lot of other German universities ranking much, much higher than Muenster University. Look at page 27 for the rank of Muenster University: :mines-paristech.fr. 
30 Univ Koeln      Univ Koeln      Germany 2,50 pts.
34 Univ Goettingen Univ Goettingen Germany 2,42 pts.
...(several other German univ)...
226 Univ Muenster  Univ Muenster   Germany 0,67 pts.
Something is wrong here.--Eusc (talk) 20:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As so far no one did care of the wrong reference I will remove it.--Eusc (talk) 14:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranking questionable
Talk:University of Passau

message: how to join  u r university  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.100.162 (talk) 14:04, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to join  u r university
Talk:Saarland University

message: Please consider incorporating any useful material from the above draft submission into this article. The draft is eligible for deletion in 6 months. ~Kvng (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:University Hospital of the Saarland]]
Talk:Hohenheim

message: There is a page for the [University_of_Hohenheim] so I do not understand why this article, which should be about the suburb of Hohenheim, is plastered with much of the same detail as the uni page. Surely it should focus SOLELY on the area. In any event, the logo of the uni as the main image is not appropriate. Somebody's got their wires crossed somewhere. BuzzWoof (talk) 11:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  REMOVE UNIVERSITY 
Talk:D-Link G604T network adaptor

message: The article D-Link G604T Network Adaptor has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:There is no verifiability, its all original research and its not a notable product. Find at least one neutral review, or really this article should go.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jez t e C 19:07, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Further to the above. I work for HP Networking as a Technical Consultant, and fully understand the WP:NPOV. I would love to see an article for every single one of my 2000 product lines, but its never going to happen. A product must be notable, otherwise at best it should sit inside a proposed List of D-Link products and nowhere else. This article seems to be a violation of WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:NOR and unless anyone disagrees differently it really should be deleted Jez t e C 19:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  User:Gorrad removed the PROD tag from the front page, with the comment and a link to a review at http://www.testfreaks.com/wireless-network/d-link-dsl-g604t/ ... ok, that's a fair attempt, but its not really a [] is it? Any comments why PROD can't be re-added?? Jez t e C 20:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[D-Link G604T Network Adaptor]]
Talk:Stuttgart Technology University of Applied Sciences

message: Is there a reason why this school is classified in the Interior Design category, other than for advertising? From what I see in the main article for this school, the school is not solely an "interior design" school; the schools offers programs beyond interior design. I'll put this question on the Administrator's board to get their feedback on this one. lwalt 00:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interior design category???
Talk:CAVNET

message: I removed the stub that read "CAVNET is also the name of a wireless network in East London. Users of said network enjoy freedom from external monitoring with reference to the community intranet and file sharing."
This article is clearly about the military network. If the London wireless network could sustain its own article, we should do that. Otherwise two articles in one doesn't make much sense to me. 96.28.228.55 (talk) 20:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed other stub
File talk:Zwan promo 2003.jpg

message: Since this band no longer exists, it is much harder to find/create a free image.  Before uploading this image, I did a fairly large search for a free image with no results.  I have repeated this act recently with the same outcome.  This image was chosen because it is an obvious promotional photograph and as such I feel it is the best of the non-free images.  I highly doubt a free image of this band will show up in the near future, if ever. Cjosefy 18:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the band no longer exists, then I agree that the image is no longer replaceable. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use
Talk:Black hole (networking)

message: A black hole isn't quite the same as a null route. As shown in the article, a black hole can simply be caused by stealth ports. This means that the route and the destination exists. Just because a destination doesn't reply, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Edit: Furthermore, black hole routes can not be detected without monitoring for lost traffic, whereas null routes are typically removed from routing tables when none of it's component routes exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.220.149.101 (talk) 02:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The differences between a null route and a black hole 
Talk:End-to-end delay

message: Someone who is knowledgeable in this subject needs to explain what N is in the formula. Is N the number of links, or the number or packet-switches? 
128.180.228.81 (talk) 01:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  N 

message: I suggest merging "one-way delay" into "end-to-end delay".
As far as I can tell from the articles themselves, both terms describe the same thing -- the number of seconds a packet spends traveling a network from source to destination.
It appears that the difference, if any, between these two things can be described in a couple of sentences in the merged article. --DavidCary (talk) 03:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Fully connected network

message: Diagram does not seem to show a fully connected network.  Can do updated diagram if required.
----
Regarding merging, I could see merging of Fully connected network, Switched communication network and Broadcast communication network if someone could suggest an appropriate name of the target article; but I am strongly against merging this article into Network topology#Mesh since fully connected network is not only a network topology but a network type. As I said, a switched network could be fully connected, but a fully connected network need not be switched. Nikola (talk) 20:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:University of Ulm

message: University is called "University of Ulm" instead of "Ulm University" several times, in the title ("Ulm University" redirects here) and throughout the article. Official english name is "Ulm University", as it says in the logo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushtitle1776 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah true ...--Jocme (talk) 21:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name consistency 

message: the motto of the univerity of ulm is "SCIENDO - DOCENDO - CURANDO" where the do-particle stand for "way of" in many asian languages.  more on the homepage of uni ulm.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.234.220.24 (talk) 12:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sciendo - Docendo - Curando 

message: Should this be added? https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/30/europe/germany-nurse-babies-morphine-intl-grm/index.html  Elijahandskip (talk) 14:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Bandwidth-delay product

message: I believe many of the examples are incorrect. The round trip time should be used instead of the one-way delay.
Dividing the TCP windows size by the bandwidth delay product will provide an accurate estimate of the percent efficiency of the link. BruceBarnett (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The examples are indeed incorrect, but not for the reason you state.  The math is incorrect, inconsistent with the text, and inconsistent from one example to another, the formatting is poor, and the assumptions are incorrect.  For instance, the RTT from my home computer (2 Mbps DSL line in Norway) to en.wikipedia.org is nowhere near 200 ms—more like 50 ms.  I don't quite understand what is meant by "Server on a long-distance 1 Gbit/s link", either.  DES (talk) 09:57, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  ...not to mention that 10 Mbps is hardly "high-bandwidth" these days, and T1 lines are usually terminated at your ISP, not routed over satellites.  DES (talk) 10:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've replaced the examples with others based on real-world numbers: one based on my own DSL line, one based on the HSDPA modem in my laptop, and one based on two servers I have in colo at two different ISPs.  DES (talk) 10:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  BDP is bandwidth delay product, not bandwidth latency product. Delay is end-to-end, hence unidirectional. That's why 2*BDP is used for buffer calculations. --113.61.79.131 (talk) 04:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  RFC 1072 as RS clearly states "The significant parameter is the product of bandwidth (bits per second) and round-trip delay (RTT in seconds); ... ". The other two sources agree on that as well so I've changed the text, also making the lead fit to the examples. Zac67 (talk) 20:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples
Talk:Aho-dong

message: Aho-dong (아호동) appears to be a tong in Haewŏl-myŏn (해월면), Paech'ŏn-kun (배천군), South Hwanghae, North Korea.  We don't generally have articles for tong or myŏn, and we don't even have an article yet for Paech'ŏn-kun.  I suspect that the Aho-dong article may have been started just because it showed up as a place name on some online weather maps near the DMZ.  But since it is such a minor locality, we may never have enough information about it to flesh out the article, leaving it therefore in perpetual orphan status.  --Reuben 18:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A merge to Paechon is probably best, once that article has been created.  There are former administrative divisions of Pohang that have a higher web profile than this little burg.  I think the "tong" in this case does not denote an administrative division, but simply "village" -- since Paech'ŏn is a county, it is unlikely to have any tong.  If Aho has any administrative existence at all, it is likely to be as Aho-ri. And even in South Korea it's quite difficult to find reliable information about individual ri.  -- Visviva 12:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update:  At least according to the 1982 edition of the Bukhan Chongram (p. 65), there is no Aho-ri in Paechon (and no Aho-dong either).  One suspects this is an archaic place name, used for convenience by the weather people.  At any rate, should definitely be merged. -- Visviva 04:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How notable?
Talk:Cambridge Ring (computer network)

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:AppleTalk#Disputed: Cambridge Ring.  -- Trevj (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: AppleTalk

message: I just added a paragraph (with citations) that notes the strong parallel between the Cambridge Ring and the earlier Pierce Loop network at Bell Labs.  When I came to Bell Labs in 1973, the Pierce Loop network connected what we would later describe as 3 workstations and a server -- that is to say, it was not just a research project, it had users.  I've put a small writeup on my memory of that system on the web; if someone thinks it's worth citing in the article, feel free to do so. Douglas W. Jones (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation between Cambridge Ring and Pierce Loop networks