Talk:Downwinders

message: This topic is relevant to all countries which have tested nuclear weapons, and to other civilian accidents, but only American incidents are covered. At the moment this article doesn't mention the Chernobyl disaster once. 81.155.57.75 (talk) 15:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added links to some other articles, but I'm not competent to rewrite this page. Can someone help? 81.155.57.75 (talk) 16:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other countries 

message: It seems a bit odd to me that, as emotional a subject as pregnancy is, the subject of pregnancy in fallout situations should have all kinds of studies associated with it.  In the current article, there are only two citations: one to pregnant women's emotional health, and one on ideas for better public health systems.  The citation required flag has been ignored.  
I think perhaps wording like "Specifically, the pregnant woman must receive a radiation dose between the 10th and 40th day of pregnancy high enough to cause mutations, but not high enough to abort or kill the mother", may be part of the problem.  Does this mean that mutations caused by radioactivity just don't count if the happen after 3 months? For most certainly, they happen throughout life; every generation passes about 150 discrete mutations from the pattern they inherit from their parents to their offspring, and that's from all sources, not just artificial radioactivity.  Or does it mean that if a mutation happens when the fetus is a month old, that in itself puts the mother at risk of death?  The whole paragraph is assertions and fuzzy, possibly wishful thinking in search of proof, when I would think the subject should be pinpoint, scientifically crucial.
If downwinders are going to be heard, they need better than a Jenny McCarthy level of representation on the subject, mixed with speculation on how John Wayne died that skips most of the subject material. SkoreKeep (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pregnant women

message: This study was not "inconclusive", as this article's author claims. From the study's summary:
"The percentages of people with each
kind of thyroid disease or with ultrasound
abnormalities were about the
same regardless of their estimated
radiation dose from Hanford’s iodine-131."
"The findings do not prove that
Hanford radiation had no effect on
the health of the area population.
However, they show that if there is
an increased risk of thyroid disease
from exposure to Hanford’s iodine-131,
it is probably too small to observe
using the best epidemiologic methods
available."
That is a conclusion, agree with it or not.
96.226.232.173 (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanford Thyroid Disease Study 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Downwinders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106001013/http://www.doh.wa.gov/hanford/publications/overview/overview.html to http://www.doh.wa.gov/hanford/publications/overview/overview.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106001013/http://www.doh.wa.gov/hanford/publications/overview/overview.html to http://www.doh.wa.gov/hanford/publications/overview/overview.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Downwinders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100823040735/http://www.doh.wa.gov/hanford/publications/overview/overview.html to http://www.doh.wa.gov/hanford/publications/overview/overview.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Utah nuclear test fallout affects me now.  I was growing up in St. Louis. 160.226.138.91 (talk) 08:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missouri? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Public-historian-90 (talk) 13:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST 121 - U.S. History since 1877

message: The paragraph talks about the amendment of the 1990 RECA act to the 2000 version and some major updates that came with it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HIST121-Augie-student (talk) 20:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a paragraph on the "compensation" section 

message: I removed the first sentence from the live article, under the compensation subtopic and added details to make a new paragraph out of it. Cherubj (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a new paragraph 

message: On the  last sentence of the third paragraph, changed "A 2010 report evaluating data on thyroid cancer incidence from 1973 to 2004 also supports a relationship between exposure from fallout and increased thyroid cancer incidence" to "A 2010 report evaluating data on thyroid cancer incidence from 1973 to 2004 also supported a relationship between exposure from fallout and increased thyroid cancer incidence" for tense consistency and added commas "...which, with the exception of a few test failures, did not release fallout."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HIST121-Augie-student (talk) 00:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edit on the 'Nevada' section 

message: Replaced the very last sentence with "These nuclear tests infused vast quantities of radioactive material into the world's atmosphere, resulting in widely dispersed radiation and its subsequent deposition as global fallout." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HIST121-Augie-student (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edit on the 'Nuclear Testing' section 

message: Added a comma in the first sentence of the second paragraph.
More generally, the term can also include those communities and individuals who are exposed to ionizing radiation and other emissions due to the regular production and maintenance of coal ash, nuclear weapons, nuclear power, nuclear waste, and geothermal energy. …” instead of “…More generally, the term can also include those communities and individuals who are exposed to ionizing radiation and other emissions due to the regular production and maintenance of coal ash, nuclear weapons, nuclear power, nuclear waste and geothermal energy….” Cherubj (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed comma splice 

message: added a missing comma on the first paragraph.
…ranges primarily in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah but also… instead of …ranges primarily in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah but also… Cherubj (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a missing comma 

message: Changed the conjunction "as" to "when" in the last paragraph as it's more appropriate in the sentence.
"In fact, the health effects of radon were first widely acknowledged when Mormon and Native American miners who hardly smoke (the main reason for lung cancer) had high incidences of lung cancer." Cherubj (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed a conjunction