Talk:List of cannabis strains

message: First of all, can we not list random unknown strains? If its not a well known strain accepted by the mainstream community, please dont list it. Second, I have started adding lineages and re-organized the hybrid section according to the appropriate lineage (either balanced (50/50), indica dom, or sativa dom). Please help by adding lineages and moving strains to their appropriate categories. A lot of strains are misplaced. Thanks
--THC 14:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Up! 

message: I would like to propose adding strain descriptions. Color, texture, density, and a summary of the high could be included. Let's start with format/layout, and then we'll decide how to go about acquiring the information (first hand experience, or possible online or published sources). I welcome anyone to produce a layout for the description ], contribs) 22:58, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strain Descriptions 

message: Changes as drastic as those warrant discussion here first. Just some basic wikipedia ethics. - Cobra Ky  (talk, contribs) 02:49, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOTE TO CEERAY 

message: Lots of the strains listed under clone only cultivars, can be grown from seeds I don't understand the selection criteria for this category. Also if someone was unfamiliar with cannabis it would apear from this list that being a clone only cultivar precluded a strain from being sativa, indica, or a sativa-indica hybrid. This list should be changed to either separate strains based on whether they are sativa, indica, or hybrid, or separate strains based on propagation methods, not both. If the list was narrowed to just the sativa/indica distinction whether or not a strain was from a cultivar that could only be produced by cloning could be noted within the list just after the strain name.65.125.163.221 23:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. When I originally started the list it was organized into sativa, indica, and hybrid only. - Cobra Ky  (talk, contribs) 19:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clone Only Cultivars

message: would a link to this cannabis strain guide be acceptable?  www.cannabishq.com/strains.html  it has no ads, or popups and is nonprofit.  it also contains many strains not listed here, which could be listed here.  would a link to the the strain guide at CHQ be in the reference section if strains from CHQ were added to wikipedia's cannabis strains section?  seems reasonable to me... Chq 04:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As you originally posted this Q a week ago and no one has raised any objections, go ahead and add the link. If someone objects in the future they can discuss it here. It should go in the External links section until/unless it is used as a reference for content in the article. --AbsolutDan (talk) 13:00, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cannabis strain guide link

message: 71.129.87.227 changed the title on one of the lists of strains to shwags.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cannabis_strains#Shwags   Chq 00:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: shwag???

message: If original strains , that were developed by the most reputable breeders in the world, are put on a 'schwag' list (even when these strains have been in existence for decades, and have a clear and undisputable record), and are replaced, in non-alphabetical order, with random (?) names , then I recommend this page be corrected or deleted.
- they were listed as schwag by someone fooling around, obviously they arent schwag strains...Chq 01:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Information on this page is disputable

message: This entire list seems to be original research.  None of the references given seem to qualify as reliable sources.  If any of the information is verifiable then citations to reliable sources should be added.  Chondrite 18:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entire list appears to be original research