lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:GRB 060218

message: I propose the star got bigger.  The star may have aged and slowed down internal processes that no longer supported the same gravity.
The gravity level dropped, and the star's diameter increased, but which happened first?  It might be thousands of years before it goes into the next phase of this transition.
: Wikipedia is not the right place to discuss original research. You might want to find a better forum for your proposal. Awolf002 14:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhh, did you read the above comment? It starts with "I propose", does it not? That's a pretty conclusive sign for original research being described, next. (My comment is about the talk entry, not the article) Awolf002 12:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conjecture 

message: Please give a reference to a publication (spectrum?) for the stated type info, then you can add the statement back. Thanks! Awolf002 15:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supernova type Ib/Ic 

message: Why that article, being a gamma ray burst, has a supernova remmant infobox instead of a gamma ray burst infobox? --MASTERMATES (talk) 16:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supernova infobox
Template talk:Non-free web screenshot

message: People are using this tag for "any image I found on the web", maybe a warning of some kind regarding this is appropriate. I will give this a couple days for responses. - cohesiont 05:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a good idea, and the text saying that should be in bold. I myself had been using it like that until someone let me know that was not what this license was for. I went back and tagged all of my "screenshots" for a fairusereview, and found that *most* of the images I saw in the category that day seemed to be of pictures of people or other graphics taken from a web page, and NOT the entire web page screenshot. This needs to be taken care of so no more violations or misunderstandings occur. (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 19:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I also added a  because some people were also having to use this for screenshot of videos/flash animations that were from online sources that didn't fall under . These I think are valid fair use probably, but it's really a different sort of use than web-screenshots. The web-screenshot choice has been removed from the dropdown menu on the upload page also, I don't think many people actually need this tag, and if they do they are probably more savvy users who know where to find it. I will give this a couple more days for other opinions still - cohesiont 19:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a good idea. The copyright problem I found especially confusing  . . . its kind of daunting to a new user to click on "Licensing" and see such a huge list of items come down . . . it is confusing, but maybe if the users had to learn to actually put in the tags themselves more they would understand better what they actually mean, and it would cause less of a headache for you admins. The way it is, a novice user might just click anything because  they don't know what's going on. thanks for helping with this! (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 21:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to have been resolved; tag now has "This tag is not appropriate for images and media found on websites; it should be used for screenshots of websites only." at the bottom.--Elvey (talk) 18:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

text: fgteev 176.16.89.63 (talk) 18:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: ('''RESOLVED''') Clarify: ''web'' screenshots only  

message: I have proposed a wording change to our non-free image templates, and I'm trying to keep the discussion centralized here. Please join in the discussion. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encouraging fair-use rationale 

message: An option to this tag that removes the "To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as well as the source of the work and copyright information." text would be appropriate; it doesn't make sense when used 'as is' for an image that has a fair use rationale, e.g. .
e.g.
| hasFUR and/or
| hasRationale
---Elvey (talk) 18:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See recent updates to the template Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:00, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Options
Talk:Andrew J. Paterson

message: Andrew J. Paterson was recently called a "National Treasure" by FADO, the premier performance artist-run centre in Canada.
*Scifireal 05:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article claims that PAtterson has written a number of books and is a significant artist. The speedy deletion tag has been removed. Any attempt to nominate this man should be through articles for deletion. Capitalistroadster 06:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate for Speedy deletion
Talk:Hi no Tori Hououhen (MSX)

message: Shouldn't this be 'Hinotori', as Japanese does not know spaces? If the name is spaced, it should be Hi no tori ('Fire'-genitive-'bird') --Bakabaka 22:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know much about Japanese linguistics, but according to http://www.msxarchive.nl/pub/msx/photos/gamecovers/Hinotori_-Konami-.jpg, there is a space in there. --Frodet 15:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I had never seen that part of the cover. --Bakabaka 15:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the Page

message: Is Hinotori a platformer? I'd say it's a shooter with puzzle elements (as reflected in the addition I made to the article). Should the category be changed to 'shooter'? --Bakabaka 22:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Platform game?

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_(manga) there should be a reference to this page since it's the origin of the game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vampier (talk • contribs) 16:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: reference?
Talk:Greg Koukl

message: I suspect this is a vanity page, in violation of wikipedia guidelines. KSchutte 06:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vanity page?

message: Unless someone is going to object, I'm going to go ahead and merge Stand To Reason into here.  From what I can tell by looking at Google News, Greg Koukl is more than notable, whereas his apologetics organization, Stand To Reason, most likely does not meet the standards to warrant its own page on Wikipedia. Phillip A (talk) 03:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 
Talk:Max Heindel

message: Aside from noted issues of NPOV, the article is in dire need of basic grammatical editing. 
Estéban (talk) 12:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Still Jacked-Up

message: I've tagged this article because of the NPOV dispute that has been around since 2006 (it takes this guy's word at face value and almost reads like an advertisement for his books/philosophy).
I've also added another notice because it has a long list of websites and books, but only four in-text citations, which would make it hard to correct the sentences (mostly pointed out above) that are really biased. — Mike J B 14:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV and Inline Citations 

message: I agree with with the tone of this talk page that the article seems written by a true unquestioning believer in Mr. Heindel's clairvoyance and that it would be best if someone with interest in his history wrote an objective account instead. I have no knowledge on Mr. Heindel.  All I was able to add to that effort was the text at the end of the section on the Magnum Opus, where I point out very serious shortcomings of said Opus, morally and scientifically, based on my own limited look through it. Adynotsuzz (talk) 17:43, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree with discussion here, Changed Magnum Opus but rewrite of entire article would be better 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: How is it that there is a picture of Heindel in Argentina, and in the entry is no mention of journeys abroad? --Manfariel (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journeys
Talk:Garden railway

message: I've removed the links to LSOL.com because this is primarily a subscription site and external links to such sites conflict with WP:EL policy. Gwernol 17:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  LSOL.com 

message: This article has recently been flagged for Neutrality and Inaccuracy violations, but there is nothing recorded here to explain WHY. Would it not make sense when someone disputes something that they ALSO added a reason here? In the absence of any FACTS I would suggest that the flag needs to be removed. I am currently reviewing a number of my books relating to Garden Railways for suitable citations and will post them shortly Lsces (talk) 08:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality and Inaccuracy Flag 

message: Shouldn't this article be merged with Backyard railroad? Cullen328 (talk) 03:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't.  These are different things. Garden railway are a subset of Backyard railroad. Backyard railroad - also include large-scale models (such as 1:4-1:12). Garden railway limited the scale of 1:16. In an extreme case - 1:12, provided that the road is not ridable. An article on backyard railroad should be expanded. Also in the article on Live Steam should write a piece about the use of smoke simulation engine (not only) for small scale models (such as - H0, Z, N), and garden railway..Зелёный Кошак 18:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Backyard railroad? 
Talk:Casino Niagara

message: I took out "operated" - facility is owned by Ontario Government but operated by a private company - I think it's called Falls Management Corp., but I don't have any references to back that up --69.157.112.26 06:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership and management 
Talk:Bernard Bailyn

message: I don't see any point in it.  Books for the most part seem to generally have separate entries, and the magic of the net and wiki is, you can link from one to the other in seconds.  Chris Rodgers 06:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Book merger

message: Two points: 1. Dr. Bailyn has a new book called The Barbarous Years: The Peopling of British North America. (Not bad for a 90-year-old!) 2. I think the "publications" section should be in chronological order, from latest to earliest, or however the format is. As it is now, with different books out of order, it seems a bit cluttered. I think it should be cleaned up a bit. OK? 74.69.11.229 (talk) 03:26, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ordering the books is a good idea. However I recommend you register as a regular user before doing so. Rjensen (talk) 03:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  body of work 

message: Why is historian Benjamin Carp described as a "wiki-skeptic" (last sentence of "Major themes and ideas" section)? This is a word with no clear meaning. RobOCalla (talk) 02:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I realize that the foregoing was posed a pandemic ago, but I don't visit this page all too often. At any rate, I believe that the historian in question had recently been interviewed on the subject of Wikipedia. If you can find the article from 2010ish, cheers to you. Bustamove1 (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki-skeptic
Talk:Saint Joseph's Catholic Church (Key West, Iowa)

message: I remember one time that Mel Gibson made public statements blaming Vatican II as being the cause of the sexual abuse crisis.  I got the impression that he was saying that there was no abuse in the church before Vatican II, and I had pointed out in some other article in Wikipedia that the priest who married my grandparents, who were married here at St. Joseph's by Fr. Patanode, had been abusing kids long before Vatican II came about.
JesseG 06:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Metal Gear Saga Vol. 1

message: I've never created an article on Wikipedia before. I've only aided in reverting vandalism, clean-up, and adding information where it has been needed. I would really appreciate some constructive criticism.
I didnt know if I should create with a Computer/Video Game Infobox, or a Film Infobox... so I just went with the former. If this is wrong, go ahead and fix it. Also, I am unaware of how to edit (or even if I should?) the Metal Gear (series) box at the bottom to include the Saga in the Updated versions and supplemental titles area.
Thanks in advance! captbananas 06:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You did a fair job in laying it all out. It looks to be rather concise and it served to fill in some lingering questions I had in regard to its content. Overall, if you want to give it a final polish, adding a screengrab or two from the interview segments would serve to help give it a visual aid as well. 4.224.249.141 20:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts? 

message: I just removed the line 
:"However, it is noteworthy to point out that Kojima has made similar statements during the release of Sons of Liberty and Snake Eater.
To my knowledge, Kojima claimed only that MGS2 would be the last MGS game that he would direct, and he later said the same of MGS3. But he has never claimed that either would be the final game in the series. On the contrary, he said that the series would continue, albeit under newer, younger directors. If this is incorrect, please provide citation. Druff 18:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kojima says: MGS4 last game in the series"
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/LUEshi (5th nomination)

message: As a side note to this frustrating AfD, I've been trying to reach a consensus proposal for an internet meme guideline on Wikipedia at User:Badlydrawnjeff/Meme.  We're trying to make some sort of guideline that can work independent of WP:WEB, which does a horrible job dealing with internet-only mediums.  Any input from people would be quite helpful. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 14:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating a Guideline for Memes
Talk:Linda Smith (comedian)

message: I reverted the deletion of "Satan being more a figure of speech for Smith than for many" because I felt it was an apt reference to her Humanist philosophy. I can't think of a reason to remove it. If you can, then please explain here. thanks. Veej 07:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I believe the comment means that "Satan" was more figurative and less literal, for her than "many". Because she was a humanist the concept of the devil held much less meaning for her than many religious/spiritual people. Veej 16:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. Dmn € Դմն 14:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Veej explained his/her thinking in more detail on my Talk page. I still don't agree though, FWIW I think the sentence was mystifying and illogical. Flapdragon 14:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Linda Smith's humanism

message: I'm not sure that her partner being "of Jewish descent" is relevant here particularly as it had little bearig on Linda Smith's career and is not referred to elsewhere in this article. Should we take it out? Crimperman (talk) 10:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree so I changed it. Dean B (talk) 13:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partner's ancestry 

message: I've added and referenced my favourite quote by Linda about not giving Jeffrey Archer the oxygen of oxygen. I hope this is okay. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 17:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 

message: Erith is listed as being in London, however it wasn't until 1965 that it was, so when Linda was born in 1958 it was in Kent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.83.146 (talk) 22:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 
Talk:Lynne Hermle

message: What makes this attorney in any way notable? It appears this article should be deleted.Cloonmore 02:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability???
Talk:Ashvins

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Fittipaldi Automotive

message: I'm intrigued by this - it sounds as if this was some kind of forerunner to the F1 effort, as Divila also worked for the team, but I don't see why they would have moved the Copersucar team to Brazil if they already had a base in England.
Any ideas? 4u1e 20:16, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Bardahl 

message: If anyone's got any decent hardcopy (as opposed to online) and English language refs for this - feel free to substitute them for the ones I've used. I'm well aware that this article relies rather too heavily on web pages, and Brazilian ones at that, but that's where a lot of the detailed history is! 4u1e 03:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Suggest that this article should be renamed Fittipaldi Automotive. The general principle with team pages is that they should be called what the team was called (unless this conflicts with an existing article). Fittipaldi Automotive makes most sense here - the team was entered as that for four of its eight years (Copersucar-Fittipaldi for three and Skol Fittipaldi for one) and I believe that this was always the name of the company itself, names on the F1 entry list are as much about advertising as anything else.
Anyone disagree? (Anyone reading this?!) Might create a slightly fearsome task in terms of redirects though - there's a lot of pages connecting here..... 4u1e 21 April 2006
:No objections in several months, so: Done! 4u1e 21:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article to Fittipaldi Automotive 

message: It says that blocks in bold indicate point scoring races. I think the color coded boxes takes care of this. I feel that it would be better if we gave the link to the color "key" and denoted pole positions with bold. -Aprithvi 04:53, 2006 July 30 (UTC)
:You're absolutely right - that was left over from the previous iteration of the results table. Cheers for the spot. 4u1e 21:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Results table 

message: It says Wilson was a "pay driver." What exactly does that mean? Recury 20:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He (or his sponsors) paid money for his drive, a not uncommon practice. 4u1e 12:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "pay driver" 

message: In 2016, Fittipaldi established Fittipaldi Motors, and along with Pininfarina and HWA AG, created his first sports car project, the Fittipaldi EF7, can it be merged into Fittipaldi Automotive. Foxerman (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Can Fittipaldi Motors be merged into this?
Talk:Pater Patriae

message: Should we add something about how Peter the Great of Russia had himself declared Pater Patriae?
As I stated in my last revision, I think finding more information, from real sources, would help this article more than a reference to Peter the Great.
I think William the Silent should be called Father of the Fatherland and not of the nation because he was the initiator of the rebellion and the leader. I am a Dutchman and can say, that in my land we always call our Pater Patriae the "father of the fatherland" "Stichter des vaderlands" in dutch which means something like "founding father of the fatherland", but most certainly not "father of the nation" because nation is an uncommon word in simple dutch and not used for the Netherlands  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.64.58.115 (talk) 17:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

message: No mention anywhere on the internet of Kim Gu being "Father of the Nation". Gu was an important figure in South Korean history to be sure but I found no reference on the internet to him being the Father of the Nation. I have reverted this twice and would not like to get into an edit war. -Phil5329 (talk) 21:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kim Gu

message: This article is, well, umm, terrible. I'm going to revamp it. Red4tribe (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Umm

message: Father of the Nation? I'm not so sure. What does everyone else think? -Phil5329 (talk) 14:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Donald Dewar]]
Talk:Human communication

message: Human communication is a vast subject (since it encompasses nonverbal communication, speech, writing, visual, Internet etc.) and I think this article might become much longer in the future. I added some mentions of these different types of communication into the article. But I think the first item in the list of communication types, "Intrapersonal communication (communication with oneself)" could be removed since I think this article is about communication between humans. Maybe move it to the "See also" list?
176.93.61.49 (talk) 00:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  My thoughts about this article and Intrapersonal communication 

message: — Assignment last updated by CommDocBDS (talk) 12:33, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Communication Studies

message: I propose merging Face-to-face interaction with Human communication. Face-to-face interaction does not seem to entirely meet the notability guidelines, and I believe it would better serve as a subcategory of human communication.
 I’ve pinged the most recent editors of both pages that might have an opinion on this. If anybody supports or opposes this, please say something. Miralitt (talk) 13:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not notice this proposal, but I'd have likely objected. Setting aside the detail that the merger discussion was not bottomposted here (I fixed it while replying), a simple GScholar query shows this is a notable subtopic. I think we will need to split it off shortly. Sorry to say, but it seems like a pointless make-up work (instaed we could use someone willing to spend time and do the mergers related to the Information Age, for example). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger
Talk:Puri

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 

message: Why does Puri lead to this article? I think it should lead to the disambiguation page as I don't think the city is more notable than other uses of the word, such as the widely consumed bread Puri (food). ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Hi does anyone have any cite for the citation needed for the Name section?Elizabeth077 (talk) 12:58, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Can anyone add citation for the Name part 