lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Callahan Middle School

message: As opposed to a speedy deletion, maybe it should be redirected to Callahan%2C_Florida#Education. There is information on this school there.
Malzees o.0 14:53, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt many readers will request the presence of Callahan Middle School, and because there is more information on the Callahan page rather than this page, that IMO supports a speedy deletion. Does the school have any notability? Rudget zŋ 14:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:LugRadio

message: I assert that LugRadio meets the notability requirements specified under Wikipedia:Notability (web). Specifically:
:1. The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself - see the Media Coverage and Awards section of the article;
:2. The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization - Best Marketing Campaign from the UK Linux and Open Source Awards (2006) and Best Linux Podcast (2007) from Linux Format magazine.
It is in need of some more references however, which I will endeavour to add. —David Johnson [T|C] 14:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:StarShipSofa

message: User:Carangil admitted, back in 2007, ""Oh dear. This is getting complicated. The story goes as this: I was given this by the authors of the StarShipSofa podcast to put on their wikipage (since I had previously made that entry)" From 27 February 2007 to 6 June 2008, he/she edited no articles except this one and related ones. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 23:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's pretty weak, unless you can point to some specific problems that have been caused by that user or any specific NPOV problems on the page as it stands - or even in that klarge block of content you just removed. The one thing I can think of is your addition regarding "lobbying", which may lean towards implying something unusual or nefarious. Artw (talk) 19:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 
Talk:The Linux Link Tech Show

message: Section moved to talk.  Seems rather trivial to me.  Perhaps a better format could be found? RJFJR (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spinoff Shows & Guest Appearances 

message: Moved from article to talk. This does not seem (to me) to conform to guidelines on external links RJFJR (talk) 12:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles written by the hosts of TLLTS 
Talk:List of number-one hits in Europe

message: Eurochart Hot 100 Singles is a U.S. Billboard chart based on sales in Europe. While the Euro 200 is a chart from Europe itself, based in sales obviously from Europe. But the number ones listed here as listed as "Euro Hot 100 Singles" but they are the Euro 200 singles. There has to be some cleaning up in here. --Crunkier21 (talk) 15:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charts confusion
Talk:Carmen de Hastingae Proelio

message: What language is the Carmen in? LordAmeth 12:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Medieval Latin.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 15:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Neat. I guess that info must not have been included way back when I noticed it. Thanks! LordAmeth (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Hybrid RAM Disk

message: References need to be cited for the article, I looked, but actually was unable to even see this exact term anywhere on Google:  or Google News: , so is it called something else in the industry? Ariel♥Gold 04:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Glen Acres Elementary School

message: I don't think this page should be deleted - people that are looking to buy a house may want to learn information about a school in the area, some of which is not published on the local school district web site (such as the year the facilty was built, number of students, etc., which may tell a parent about overcrowding, or school facilities that are past their prime). Having this resource available on Wikipedia is very important. The more information we have available about schools, the better.
PDS
:Yes, that argument has a name, WP:USEFUL which is not a reason to keep. In this case, the information would be better consolidated on West Chester Area School District. Elementary school pages are problematic for Wikipedia, because the kiddies vandalize the heck out of them, so the consensus is that unless the school is notable, they should be deleted. AnteaterZot (talk) 01:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but since the people who run the school are free to alter the article, can you believe the article then? Besides, research has shown that the only true difference between a good school and a bad one is the proportion of impoverished students. The more lower-class students, the worse the school will be. The quality of the teachers is irrelevant, as is the quality of the facilities. So you would be better off using US Census data to research a school than a Wikipedia article that talks about the wonderful new paint job the school has. AnteaterZot (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and I think you misunderstood me when I said the "information would be better consolidated on West Chester Area School District." What I meant was, we have an article on the West Chester Area School District <-- click on it. AnteaterZot (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page deletion
Talk:Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency

message: I disagree that this article needs to be rewritten.  It is clearly not an advertisement.  It is simply a subject about which there may not be much public knowledge or interest.  More than likely it is taken straight from an "about" page on the DSS website.  Until someone has additional information about this topic, it will probably remain like this.  I feel the advertisement tag should be removed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Anarchyson (talk • contribs) 17 Nov 2007
:I think part of the problem was that the content was taken almost verbatim from the DSS website, so it did sound like it was "tooting their horn", so to speak.  I've just done a rewrite which hopefully addresses this, and removed the tag.  If others feel it still needs work, by all means put the tag back, but please add some specific comments here. —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 00:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: This article is so short. I was wondering, is this part of or somehow connected to the United States Pentagon Police? Kimera757 (talk) 13:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to United States Pentagon Police? 

message: Citation #5 links out to an Australian Agriculture Department and the information there is unrelated to article. Placing disputed section tag for section. Apologies if this is incorrect procedure; I am following the wiki instructions. EmoDP (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate/Outdated Source Material
Talk:Crowcombe

message: In 1724 the spire was damaged by a lightning strike.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.179.158 (talk) 14:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actof god? 
Talk:Canons Regular of the Holy Cross of Coimbra

message: Editorial Note:  The correct name of the king was Dom João Peculiar, and not "Don Juan Peculiar".
Both the title "Don" and the name "Juan" are Spanish and not Portuguese.  The two nations and their languages are quite different (Portugal's national borders were established in the 12th Century; Spain was not unified until the 15th), and most Portuguese find the use of Spanish names and designations for Portuguese leaders demeaning.
Cón. Francisco Carlos Zanger+ / Canon Francis C. Zanger+, Braga, Portugal
83.132.38.63 (talk) 02:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Category talk:War on terror

message: Can someone else attempt again to move/rfc this category to match the unabbreviated name used everywhere else.
See below for justification.
The justification of the December 5 "no consensus" was the November 2 "no consensus".
The justification of the November 2 "no consensus" was "This is a discussion that needs to resolve (or fail to resolve) on the article talk page."
(see the more recent discussion on the talk page at: Talk:War_on_Terrorism#War_on_Terrorism_vs._.28informal.29_.22War_on_Terror.22
)
The justification of the October 3 Merge of Category:War on Terrorism into Category:War on Terror was the September PAGE MOVE discussion at Talk:War_on_Terror#Title.
The justification for the September PAGE MOVE discussion was WP:COMMONNAME based primarily on Google results.
However:
* When google is searched in accordance with Wikipedia standards, the opposite is found:
:* "War on Terrorism" -wikipedia :: 6,870,000
:* "War on Terror" -wikipedia :: 1,040,000
Also:
* Naming_conventions#Prefer_spelled-out_phrases_to_abbreviations.
* "On Wikipedia, neutrality trumps popularity". "Terror" abbreviation is more emotive, less precise, and less official.
There was a discussion with general consensus to keep the unabbreviated article name, a discussion which included the editor responsible for the September article MOVE. See more discussion at:
Talk:War_on_Terrorism#War_on_Terrorism_vs._.28informal.29_.22War_on_Terror.22
GodWasAnAlien (talk) 09:20, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undo September merge with abbreviated name 

message: Just call it the Global War of Terror and everybody will know what the subject is about. Hcobb (talk) 14:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Use the full name
Talk:Congestion pricing

message: Talon bar, I reverted again your deletion as per WP:BRD and to preserve content fully supported by reliable sources, in fact there is an entire section with the economics rationale that it seems you did not read. The lead did not have those sources because as per WP:Manual of Style if the content is fully supported by reliable sources there is no need to repeat them in the lead (they were dropped during the GA review of this article, and all sources were checked by the reviewers and accepted as reliable sources). So, if you still have an issue with that paragraph, please detail it here, but first read the first section of the article, and also I recommend you to check the articles about public goods, tragedy of the commons, Pigovian tax, and externalities (this is not a public monopoly as you claimed in your edit). The economic theory supporting congestion practice is old and well established. See also the article section about criticism. Please, do not start an edit war. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 06:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, there is no economic theory to support congestion pricing.  It has always been, and always will be, an effort to fund a public monopoly, the MTA of NY.  This has been true since the term was invented.  It is not an economic theory, it is a taxation scheme.  I know, I've been working on this since the 1950's.  There is no market.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talon bar (talk • contribs) 01:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately mainstream transportation economics does not share your view, and all content here is fully supported by reliable sources and college textbooks in economics (it is using a pricing mechanism to regulate the consumption of a public good, therefore it is indeed applied economics). For example, check the source supporting the World Bank support for the implementation of Singapore's scheme, the first one in the world, in operation for more than 40 years. As per Wikipedia policies you need to support your edits with WP:reliable sources. You are welcome to include this POV (I will suggest in the controversy section) but only if supported by reliable sources. If you have material related to a specific congestion pricing scheme, such as NYC, please do your edit in the corresponding article. You seem to be new to Wikipedia, but by now you should be aware that Wikipedia is NOT a blog or discussion forum where we can introduced our opinion, which is considered WP:original research.--Mariordo (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not market economics??? 

message: :: in my opinion the article needs a lot of work to "earn" the status... Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Reassessment
MediaWiki talk:Watchlist-messages

message: I'm requesting that a watchlist notice advertising Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability/June 2024 Drive run from now to about June 10th.
Want to improve Wikipedia's reliability? Compete in WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive starting on June 1st and replace  tags with references!
Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 12:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, the drive is coming up very soon. Cremastra (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  — xaosflux Talk 20:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

text: ran it until the 7th. — xaosflux Talk 20:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank-you so much. Cremastra (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed backlog drive 

message: If someone plans to bump the cookie number (or however it works) when the current RFA gets to the voting stage, causing the watchlist notice for this RFA to reappear for those who dismissed it, I'd like to request that it be discussed before it's just unilaterally done. I don't agree with it.  Whether it's discussed now - before we're sure it will be needed - or when a request is made, I don't care too much about. Floquenbeam (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, that should not become a standard practice without first discussing it. — xaosflux Talk 22:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second notice for an RFA once voting starts 

message: I suggest that we have a watchlist announcement about the ongoing Wikimedia Foundation election. This affects all WMF projects, and is of direct interest to the Wikipedia community.
I propose something along the lines of...
"The Wikimedia Foundation Board election process is ongoing. There are four open seats on the Board of Trustees, and twelve candidates running in the election. Until June 12th, you may ask questions to the candidates here. You can use this tool to verify if you are eligible to participate in the election."
Thoughts? Pecopteris (talk) 01:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watchlist suggestion
Talk:Interval Pairs

message: The page I'm making is a bit of a work in progress. At the moment my professor is teaching this subject and I have the complete steps in my notes. However my introduction is a bit limiting in the sense that you can only use two sets of two intervals; That was the example and it was noted later that once can use any amount of sets and (although not too likely as it is called interval pairs) more than two intervals. The core concept is the staking of repeated intervals though. Any help on my wording is appreciated. Valdalen (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interval Pairs
Talk:R2

message: This disambiguation page was marked for cleanup per MOS:DAB. I removed the following entries for seemingly nonnotability, irrelevance, or for not providing a link.
* Real Personal Trooper Type-2, an original mecha in the Super Robot Wars series
* Release 2, or Second Release (for example Windows Server 2003 R2)
* R2, a non-LTR retrotransposable element which inserts into the ribosomal RNA genes in arthropods and other organisms
* Switched-On Schoolhouse
* Ryzom Ring, editor tool for the MMORPG Ryzom
– sgeureka t•c 16:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Under Ben Bulben

message: By Irish law, this poem is still in copyright until 70 years after the poet died. I don't know what law Wikipedia operates under, though.
Luckily the poet has, as of January this year (2009), been dead for over 70 years. However, this I was hoping for a bit more of an article on the poem rather than pretty much just the text of it, which can be found all over the internet anyway. 120.18.79.88 (talk) 00:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SSK

message: This disambiguation page was marked for cleanup per MOS:DAB. I removed the following terms because they did not establish notability by either being bluelinks or having incoming links.
* SSK Industries, a firearms business in Wintersville, Ohio
* SSK (sports products company), a company of sports products in headquartered in Osaka, Japan.
* Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu-Social Security Instutition of Turkey
* Mercedes-Benz SSK
* Japanese company Sasebo Heavy Industries
* Stockholms Sportvagnsklubb, a Swedish racing club
* South Side Kings
– sgeureka t•c 16:46, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Pancha Carrasco

message: Several sources seem to agree that she was born in 1826 and 64 years old when she died in 1890.  But there are a couple of discrepancies in the "Biography" section of her Wiki article: (1)  She was married for the first time in 1834 - that would have made her only 8 years old! (2) "In 1856, when William Walker and his filibusteros invaded Costa Rica...", she was 30 years old, not 40.    Esaons (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Costa Rica seems pretty convinced about the 1816 date - they issued a stamp for her 200th birthday in 2016.  Stan (talk) 12:11, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Carrie Rozelle

message: So was her maiden name Dike or Dyke? The article contradicts itself on this point. Nonstopdrivel (talk) 18:16, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maiden name
Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Candidate statements/Danny/Questions for the candidate

message: Don't you agree this page is useful for other users, to see and evaluate the questions that you're being asked (and going to ignore per your Candidate statement)? I do. — Dorftrottel⁠ 15:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I for one find it an interesting choice, and I will follow the reaction to it with interest. However, I do think that it does limit the voter's ability to evaluate your ability as an Arbitrator, particularly when a primary basis for them to perform such evaluations is through said questions. Perhaps Danny would be willing to answer a few questions on his talk page? Anthøny 21:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, he closes his statement with "I will not be answering any further questions". — Dorftrottel⁠ 02:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it helps, I certainly think he's given the community all the information it needs.  Alai 05:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At this point, if you don't know who Danny is, and you don't know his viewpoints/past history, you should probably do your own research. He's certainly qualified for the position., having, you know, been a foundation employee, and nearly being elected to the board. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 06:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention the office actions he once took against a current board member, in what could arguably be described as a "bad call", some argue. — Dorftrottel⁠ 11:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, he's already got my support. User:Veesicle 11:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that goes to support my point above...  Alai 16:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion moved from questions page
Talk:Great Leap Forward (evolution)

message: The page should be renamed as 'Upper Paleolithic Revolution' 91.153.53.121 (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: National Geographic calls it Great Leep Forward. Is Upper Paleolithic Revolution a more popular term elsewhere? Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 01:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Named 'Upper Paleolithic Revolution' or 'Great Leap Forward'
Talk:Academic grading in Singapore

message: i am in singapore and i am unsatisfied with the singapore grading. i prefer japanese grading. Jiawhein (talk) 08:37, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Grading

message: Do a ITE GPA and it's marks 2405:800:8032:837:1:0:AD1E:1BAC (talk) 13:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITE
Talk:Esprit de Corps (magazine)

message: :A 2007 article with multiple issues including "close connection" (2017; WP:COI - policy), "neutrality" (2017; WP:NPOV -policy and Five pillars), "does not cite any sources" (2016; verifiability - policy), and of course, using the "External links" (2014) as a source, all against policies and guidelines. Some have not been marked. The article uses the names of several living people (I marked the talk page) and even stated, "In 1991, Esprit de Corps ran a controversial article", and it named names. This very likely should not be on Wikipedia without a source, but there are several more instances, not just one. There are also weasel words such as "proud history".
:An article, with no sources, breaking "all the rules" (or most), and still around 16 years later. --  Otr500 (talk) 06:06, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Queen Nandi Mounted Rifles

message: Under "World War II" ... "In January 1934 the regiment was re-mustered as an armoured reconnaissance regiment of the 6th Armoured Division."
Surely this should be 1943? Agbneill (talk) 14:14, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. Read that again. BoonDock (talk) 14:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction
Talk:United States lightship Relief (WLV-605)

message: Photos and photo uploads are needed.
*No HABS photos are available.
*No NRHP photos are avaialble on-line.
*New photos are needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by doncram (talk • contribs) 
**Done. Killiondude (talk) 06:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Kelly Tilghman

message: While the article as listed is fairly accurate, further citations are needed to back up some comments. Given this is about a living person, Bio standards should apply. I will be adding citations here for discussion over the next week for final inclusion. Please discuss here.
IlliniGradResearch (talk) 03:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Banner, Citation Requests

message: I think is a great addition!  First time observing Kelly and love her professionalism! And knowledge of the game!!  Hope we see a lot more of her! 47.203.56.116 (talk) 15:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kelly Tilghman
Talk:Jimmy Walker (golfer)

message: Prefer James William Walker to James William "Jimmy" Walker per MOS:LEGALNAME quote - "It is not always necessary to spell out why the article title and lead paragraph give a different name." And various discussions such as here and here and just plain common sense. "Jimmy" is a common shortened/nickname of "James" - no need to overburden the lead paragraph when the article title states the obvious. Tewapack (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead paragraph
Talk:Copyscape

message: The service does not, itself, detect plagarism (nor copying); it does help users detect it. --Ernstk (talk) 18:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagarism detection

message: Much of this article reads like advertisement. However, I will wait for further developments to see if this is changed before posting a notice.--Ernstk (talk) 18:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: The whole article should just be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.237.82.79 (talk) 09:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  It still feels like an advertisement