lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sexual Slang

message: I just deleted all of the content from this article and REDIRECTed to Sexual slang (with the proper capitalization), since this article was simply a spurious divergence (accidental?) from the "proper" one (see respective page histories). Two terms were added to this page after the divergence occured; I've added them to Sexual slang. The other edits since July 6th were minor changes that have no bearing on the other page. - dcljr 09:09, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:List of television stations in Africa

message: Where are the sources for this monster? I hate lists; in the Portuguese wikipedia I try to seek-and-destroy and kill'em all. Albmont (talk) 01:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 
Talk:Metaphase

message: how does metaphase done
is this really a stub? --Herzog 04:42, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is. Melchoir 08:38, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed. – ClockworkSoul 16:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs references and expansion on metaphase during meiosis and during closed mitosis (spindle forms inside the nucleus). Another useful addition may be a section on metaphase "arrest" by microtubule-affecting drugs (e.g. colchicine and colcemid) and their uses in cell biology (e.g. cell cycle synchronization), cytogenetics (e.g. karyotyping) and beyond (e.g. chemotherapy and plant breeding). - tameeria 21:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: annene dölü verdiğimde metafaz olur 109.228.193.23 (talk) 19:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: May be another picture would be better as the one displayed seems to be a prometaphase: there is a chromosome with an unaligned kinetochore close to the spindle pole at the bottom right of the picture. The one/ a similar used for the kinetochore page would be in my opinion better. May be also show what happens in yeast as it is quite differentWikivax0 21:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:John Oswald (composer)

message: What is the bizarre, long, out of place text added below the discography? Is this just simply cut-and-pasted from another site about Oswald? It really needs to be cleaned up if not excised completely. Inoculatedcities 23:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What the...?

message: * Anti-copyright
--Jimaltieri 10:10, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also 
Talk:G-spot

message: the description below the first pic is wrong and why he/she doesn't use the original pic WhiteHat018 (talk) 02:01, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  why the first image about g-spot doesn't use the orgin 

message: What about mentioning that the glans of the penis can also stimulate the G-spot very well? Mankind would be extinct if women were not stimulated by the penetration of the penis at the G-spot. It can't be that in the evolution of man the G-spot developed so that women would buy sex toys in 2020. Why not mention the positions in which it works, instead of mentioning one position, in which it sometimes doesn't, although that is not true for everyone. Sciencia58 (talk) 19:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We need reliable medical sources to make any changes. Crossroads -talk- 18:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stimualtion 

message: ..no it isn't? No one colloquially refers to the G-spot as the Gräfenberg spot. Of course it isn't at all inaccurate to report that it's named after him, but it's inaccurate to imply that people actually call it that outside of niche medical reports and funny college papers. Maybe a bad romcom novel-turned-movie about two doctors. Dunno.
Recommend changing the language to "scientifically known as the Gräfenberg spot." Aiviphoria (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "also called the Gräfenberg spot" 

message: I disagree with using "factitious" in the short desc. Factitious = "artificially created or developed." That doesn't sound NPOV to me. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short desc
Talk:Firebombing

message: :Image:StPaulsCathedral.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 22:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:StPaulsCathedral.jpg

message: I have just completed a large re-write of the examples section. The examples section was an example of an  and . The category and to a lesser extent the  template cover the list issue. The trouble with listing cities hit by man made a firestorm is that there is disagreement over whether particular raids started a firestorm or just very bad fires. Although with some, such as Hamburg, Dresden and Tokyo there is no doubt, there are a lot of marginal ones where some historians describe them as firestorms and others do not. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 11:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Example farm

message: The page is currently fixated on aerial bombardment. While any cause of any fire by bombardment would be overbroad, the widespread and terroristic naval rocket attacks like Second Copenhagen, the demonstration attacks during the Opening of Japan, and the gunboat assaults on China and elsewhere during the 19th century where incendiary damage and terroristic effects were forefront should be mentioned here as a separate kind of firebombing. — LlywelynII 18:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion needed
Talk:Cultural evolution (disambiguation)

message: This article should be merged with Cultural selection theory as they both provide an overview of theories from a wide range of disciplines and areas of study. An overview of the field can be found at http://www.agner.org/cultsel/chapt2/  Whichever article is retained should do no more than provide brief descriptions of the various theories in perhaps little more detail than is currently at the disambiguation page for Cultural evolution (disambiguation) LookingGlass (talk) 13:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There are multiple overlapping articles in this area, and while I agree some of them ought to be merged (my preference would be merging cultural selection theory into cultural evolution, by far the more common name for the body of theory it's describing), until that is done we need to retain a disambiguation page. Joe Roe (talk) 18:45, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree the disambiguation page should be retained whatever happens.  I find the descriptions here clearer and more helpful than those given in the articles they refer to. If Cultural evolution is the common name then I agree to its retention.  But the article on it is poor/more of a stub compared to this one.  My suggestion referred to the content.  2c.  LookingGlass (talk) 14:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused. This is the talk page for the disambiguation page, so I assumed that's what you were suggesting be merged. Were you talking about cultural evolution? Joe Roe (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Apologies Joe, yes, you're right, I was referring to Cultural evolution not to Cultural evolution (disambiguation)- (I hadn't actually considered an option to merge the disambiguation page).  So, to clarify, I agree with everything you wrote.  There are several ovelapping articles, as you say, an issue I had thought to try and address but didn't feel able to do what imo was needed.  I arrived at this disambiguation page from Cultural evolution as Cultural evolution is described there as a social theory and there is an issue whether sociocultural, social, and cultural are or are not synonymous.  It occured to me that mergeing Cultural evolution with Cultural selection theory may perhaps be a first step in bringing the various "summarising" articles on the discipline (if such it can be said to be) together.  2c LookingGlass (talk) 14:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see what's happened. Talk:Cultural evolution redirects here, because when the draft was moved to mainspace Draft talk:Cultural evolution was left behind. I've requested an admin move it now; perhaps once that's done we should move this discussion there. Joe Roe (talk) 16:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for moving the draft talk; I've continued this discussion there Talk:Cultural evolution #Merge.  AndySLord (talk) 08:39, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE
Talk:Soviet battleship Novorossiysk

message: The article content uses transliteration Novorossiysk, while the title is Novorossiisk. Obviously, these should be united; as far as I understand Transliteration of Russian into English, y is more correct and also wis in googlefight 35 000 : 11 000 (where 3 of first 10 results are Wiki mirror/leeches). So, any objections to moving it? --Malyctenar 13:11, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Torch Song Trilogy

message: It's either a play in three acts, or three one-act plays; calling it three plays "presented in" three acts is absurd. 2.45.82.98 (talk) 21:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three-act play, or three one-act plays?
Talk:Thompson sporadic group

message: Re the question of whether this article should be merged with "Thompson groups", I would say definitely not. The sporadic Thompson group and the infinite Thompson groups are about as unrelated as two concepts in group theory can be, and are named completely independently after two different people both called Thompson. Best wishes, Cambyses 14:36, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: "(mathematics)" seems like the wrong disambiguation; see Talk:Suzuki group (mathematics)#Title --GodMadeTheIntegers (talk) 18:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There are three sporadic groups with names that need disambiguation.  McLaughlin group (mathematics), Suzuki group (mathematics), and Thompson group (mathematics).  This disambiguation seems the most consistent choice to me.--Foobarnix (talk) 21:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Film speed

message: In the case of black and white films, the ISO standard specifies development for specified contrast levels.  In the case of color films, like C41 and E6, the times are fixed.  Films like the Ektachrome P800/1600 might not actually be pushed in the technical sense, as they are developed for the appropriate time for that film, which happens to be longer than the process-specified time.  For Delta 3200, the characteristic curve has an unusual shape, such that the ISO standard doesn't work as well.  There is no straight line section in the Delta 3200 curve. Gah4 (talk) 18:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  marketing anomalies  

message: These links are missing: :da:ISO (filmfølsomhed), :fr:Sensibilité ISO, :ja:ISO感度, :sv:ISO-grader. --2A02:810A:86C0:6590:88F1:C654:218E:9873 (talk) 17:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Interwiki Links 

message: I think the ASA section needs a conversion table for ASA 1942 vs. ASA 1960, to make the change more transparent, complete with a third column for modern ISO, to show easily how ISO is still identical to ASA 1960 in values. --2003:DA:CF39:B861:60FA:97C4:BA2C:67AC (talk) 23:15, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASA: 1943 vs. 1960 

message: Polaroid Type 107/667 were specified as 3000-speed films, not 3200; does this need to be reflected in the table? Okto8 (talk) 17:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intermediate speeds for odd films?
Category talk:Images

message: moved from the village pump
*Hello I am a user from to Wikipedia in spanish. My propose it´s show you that I discovered two days ago.
*The images may to be categorized, and then it´s more easy for users to find the image what they need for those article. In "enWikip" you have 11360 images, and so it´s very difficult to find one image for to put in one article. If you will be categorize all images, for theme (topic), then to search the image it´s easy.
*How?: In the page of the image you must edit and to put the  Category: Topic (image) where "Topic" it´s the category like it to have in the articles, but adding the suffix (images) (witn a space between). So in all images. Each images accept several categories, it´s very "recomendable" what not only edit one category, but also all categories which the images "in".
*The categories so creates, they must categorized in the three o subcategorized, where the category master it´s : Category:Images . This category, and the rest of subcategories, appear in the page of categories but, they difference from categories of articles, in the suffix (images) .
*I have create the category images and i have introduced one image for to show you like this to do. You can to see :Category:Images for details.. in the Spanish Wikipedia, y have categorized around 80 images and you can to see there, if here you don´t understand the "how" : http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Im%E1genes 
*I´m sorry , what you now for me you hace more work , but it´s one step more, for to arrive to our "meta"... 
*If you have any doubts quetion me, (in the wikipedia spanish, please : shame user), but me english it´s bad... lucky: .. --Crescent Moon 22:25, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: *One more thing: you must to tel this to another wikipedia's in another countries ... --Crescent Moon 22:31, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorizing images
Talk:Jean Carnahan

message: The tone of this article suffers from a snide sexism and a denial of voter agency that is characterisitc of conservative speak.  Jean Carnahan is singled out for having won office because she was attached to a politically powerful man.  Why there is no comparable reference to the father-daughter Murkowski team in the Senate?  This article also suggest that the voters of Missouri somehow didn't understand that Mel Carnahan was dead when they voted.
:Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome.
:jredmond 16:13, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The article already stated two sentences earlier that she ran as an incumbent in the 2002 special election but was defeated by Jim Talent.  But  don't think your edit hurts anything.  TMS63112 02:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Silent Holocaust (Judaism)

message: I have removed a large amount of material from this article, because it was supported by non-reliable sources.  These were opinion pieces, sometimes mis-labeled as being news articles.  The various claims made ("many rabbis", "used by scholars" and so on) were not in any way shown by these sources.
Please do not restore any material unless it is supported by actual WP:reliable sources.  Opinions must be ascribed to the opinion holder, and some evidence presented that that person is, in fact, qualified to have that opinion presented on Wikipedia. Do not insert material lsimply because you believe that material to be true, that is not sufficient for use on Wikipedia.  All material on Wikipedia must be verifiable and supported by citations from reliable sources,  Information which is not so supported may be removed from the article at any time.
Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:35, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of material 

message: The two articles are about largely they same thing, even if they refer to slightly different phrasings. SomethingForDeletion (talk) 19:26, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: Contents seem pretty similar, though the section on abortion should be moved somewhere else. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  21:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Support merge. Abortion content not relevant to Judaism shouldn't be on an article which is about the Jewish use of the term; may be worth mentioning at the Silent Holocaust disambiguation page. – GnocchiFan (talk) 16:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose merge with [[Second Holocaust]]
Talk:Kenneth Halliwell

message: A random clean up, facts gleaned from internet. I am not familiar with the subject matter. This article is basically a complementary stub to Joe Orton. Ianb 17:11, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: against - the reasons for Orton's murder need contextualization and including Halliwell's relevant details there would be an extensive diversion, unless the Orton article grows substantially in length. Philip Cross 20:07, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Worth his own page. Charles Matthews 07:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging into the Joe Orton article 

message: In the original 1967 Monterey Pop Festival I believe that Halliwell and Orton are capture in the audience during the  performance of Country Joe and the Fish midway though the film. I do not know of any films that captured live images where the two authors are seen together therefore I am mention this possible sighting film here. I own a copy of the Criterion Collect of Films Directed by D.A. Pennebaker. The concert took place in June of 1967. My claim needs validation.The Budzone guy 00:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A possible Halliwell and Orton image in a film

message: Should the lead image be cropped? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image 

message: I think Halliwell turning bald at 20 should be mentioned - that's enough to screw you up on its own. Wolstan Dixie (talk) 13:39, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the wig could also be mentioned. Do you have good source(s)? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:44, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baldness
Talk:Alaisiagae

message: Changed Norse to Germanic. Whatever the Alaisiagae were, they were not specifically Norse. Io 18:57, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Geoffrey M. Gleadall talked about two inscriptions in Greek recorded in L'Annee Epigraphique for the year 1973. Alas I couldn't
find these inscriptions there, neither other persons I asked about this problem. Who can tell me where I can find these
inscriptions en what is exactly mentioned in it ? Geoffrey can you perhaps help me ? send 3 Feb 2007.
The only other reference I can find on the internet for this says "AE 1973 265/266."  The items in this journal are numbered.  In this particular journal, these items are on the first page for the Sicily section.  These say nothing at all about the Alaisiagae or any of the deities mentioned.  Propose we remove this?  Cloudtoad (talk) 17:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference  l'Année Épigraphique for 1973 

message: Seeing as I am finding it rather impossible to know for sure how this is to be pronounced is anyone out there that could give us the phonemic script for it? Mephisteus (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonemic Alaisiagae 

message: HR Ellis Davidson interprets the Alaisiagae as Valkyries with their connection to war. Alaisiagae is translated as 'all conquering' and there is the connection with Mars Thincsus which seems to be a version of Tiw, god of the Thing -which again links them with war. Beda/BAVDIHILLIE is according to her the same as Beadohild/Bodvild in the Wayland saga.
Bunnyman78 (talk) 16:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valkyries 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism/Archive 1

message: For article on Hebrew name User Gilgamesh and User Mustafaa are having a ball tearing up the turf. Using fonts  and systems that just come up as "little boxes". It's a case of a "little knowledge is a dangerous thing" as they "decide" on their own the meanings of Hebrew language words from the Torah and Tanakh sometimes using little more than guess-work. IZAK 16:51, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: See [[Talk:Hebrew name]]
Talk:Tamil Eelam

message: @Oz346 I have uploaded images of my calculations here. As you said, it is true that Puttalam is not a part of "Tamil Eelam". This has been extensively discussed and also proved here  with sources. But for some reason, no change to the map has been done in the wikipedia article of "Tamil Eelam". Hence, I have calculated the religion and ethnicity of "Tamil Eelam" including Puttalam as according to this wikipedia article, Puttalam is a part of "Tamil Eelam". JohnWiki159 (talk) 15:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, i've added a note to the box mentioning the controversy as per that previous discussion.Oz346 (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity and Religion of "Tamil Eelam"