lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Culinary triangle

message: Whether or not this is notable in its own right, a simple redirect is the wrong answer. Culinary triangle points from the CLS article which means that someone who wants to find out what it is is dumped in cookery and can't work it out. FWIW I was searching on google for "culinary triangle", No. 1 hit is the CLS article I followed that to here. This needs fixing. 
I think its a sufficiently well known theory in social anthropology to be worth its own page. Francis Davey (talk) 21:57, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A cursory web search drops articles that reference the subject - it seems to be reasonably well recognised. You might think its barking of course, but that's no reason no to include it 8-). Francis Davey (talk) 22:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Care to use this anecdotal evidence to, y'know, improve the referencing of the article? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 23:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: According to the picture, those three main ways of preparing food are: smoking, grilling and FERMENTING. There is nothing about the last one in the text (ok, maybe it does't apply to meat but, for instance, to dairy products).
Then there are three additional cooking types: roasting (heaven knows what's the difference between this and grilling), boiling and - to close the circle - steaming.
83.24.2.188 (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image and the text don't really match...
Talk:Minister of Railways (New Zealand)

message: Every single date in the table that I have looked at so far has been wrong. Not just a little bit wrong, but completely. Take, for example, Colin McLachlan, who apparently took office on 24 August 1975. Well, McLachlan was National, and National only got its majority in the general election held on 29 November 1975, before forming a government on 12 December. So 24 August is evidently wrong. Any idea what's going on? Schwede66 18:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Strange. I think the original list was from Bob Stott's book - will find where I put it in the bookcase... --LJ Holden 09:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong dates
Category talk:Cooking

message: we currently have 'kitchenware' 'cookware and bakeware' 'food utensils' and 'tableware', all with associated sub-categories. these need to be collapsed and combined. I would also argue that tableware needs to be moved up a level, or that "Serving (food)" needs to be created as a parallel to "cooking". FiveRings (talk) 22:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  need to collapse categories
Template talk:Los Angeles San Fernando Valley

message: I'm not an expert on the area, so I don't feel comfortable doing this myself, but perhaps someone may want to add Universal City, California to this template, and change the categories and templates on that page to reflect the San Fernando Valley style? I noticed that Universal Studios was in the valley template, but Universal City wasn't, even though it's opening line states it's part of the valley. Matt T. (talk) 22:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This template, created about two years, was basically designed to list districts in the Valley within the LA city limits. Hence the title in the header, "Los Angeles city areas within the San Fernando and Crescenta Valleys". Universal City is there on this template under the "See also" section (of course, Universal City is a separate community outside the LA city limits because, as the article says, Universal Studios wants to avoid following LA's city and tax laws). Template:San Fernando Valley, on the other hand, was created in early January 2009, I presume so there would be a separate regional template for the entire valley. I don't know if that helps. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Universal City, California
Talk:Daughters of the Dragon

message: The lede says, "The team first appeared in Deadly Hands of Kung Fu #32 (January 1977),[1] introduced in the early 1970s in early Iron Fist stories."
The body says, "The Daughters of the Dragon, as a team, first appeared in Marvel Team-Up #64 (December 1977)."
So, which did they first appear in?
:(a) Deadly Hands of Kung Fu #32 (Jan. 1977)
:(b) early 1970's Iron Fist stories, or 
:(c) Marvel Team-Up #67 (Dec. 1977). 
107.15.240.111 (talk) 01:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions
Talk:Would I Lie to You? (Charles & Eddie song)

message: I've taken the liberty of altering this epithet to "pop-soul" as IMHO "blue-eyed soul" refers to soul music performed by 'white' artists; I believe this is inaccurate in this case since the late Charles Pettigrew was African-American. Dunks (talk) 05:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "blue-eyed soul duo" 
Talk:Joey (1985 film)

message: Ok, I don't know who wrote this article, but apparently they never bothered to watch the film, since it is neither a science fiction nor a horror film.  It is a fantasy film.  I will leave the Category and Wikiproject tags, but I will change the article to reflect the movie better. Eridani (talk) 01:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre mix-up
Talk:Violent Summer

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 14:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Estate Violenta →  – Violent Summer is the most commonly and first used title on MUBI, Rotten Tomatoes, Netflix, Film at Lincoln Center, BAMPFA (Berkeley Art Museum & Pacific Film Archive), Harvard Film Archive, New York Times, Unifrance, and on the 2006 US DVD release, and is also commonly used in film literature. All this supports the use of the English title for the article on English Wikipedia. The article was moved from Violent Summer to its present title by another user in 2007 without prior discussion or consensus. Robert Kerber (talk) 21:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 February 2024
Talk:A New Refutation of Time

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving. -- Yamara ✉ 21:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: This seems to small an article to stand alone, and would have relevance in discussing Jorge Luis Borges in the article proper. That is, this fragment would be informative in the context of the larger article, but doesn't really seem to need its standalone status. Why not merge it into the larger piece on the writer himself? Bosola 20:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:CAN SLIM

message: This reads like an ad. "Has reportedly made hundreds of millions by consistently following the approach". Sure. And the 'reference' is to a marketing page by the guys selling these magical rules. This is unproven, unverified, pseudoscience nonsense and this wikipedia page is obviously written by people who make money selling it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.82.249.130 (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement?

message: I am not sure if I am following proper etiquette (your post on my talk page suggested that if I disagreed to remove the 'dated prod' template from the article). I am not affiliated with Investor's Business Daily in any sense. However, if you can have value investing as an article and not consider it spam, than you can certainly have CAN SLIM. I did include the criticisms of value investors as part of the article, and cannot see any immediately apparent sources of bias that I may have subconsciously introduced. In fact, personally I prefer Buffett's strategy. However, I felt O'Neil's ideas were important enough to include for at least a sense of perspective.
CAN SLIM and value investing are two of the many strategies to stock market investments. William O'Neil may not have as many adherents as Warren Buffett, but his ideas are still important enough to be discussed on many many forums that his newspaper does not directly control. I must admit, my knowledge of the market is relatively limited compared to many of the users on here. I would love to have someone with more experience weigh in on this article. Chantoke 11:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To delete or not to delete

message: WP has both CAN SLIM & CANSLIM. Anyone available is encouraged to merge them. Both with- and without-space versions are used; note O'Neil's preference--CAN SLIM®. —jisok 06:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge duplicates
Talk:To Kill a King (film)

message: Although a very watchable film, I was curious to find out if it was a realistic portrayal of events at that time. I did some research into Thomas Fairfax and decided to include a section covering what Fairfax's role actually was in the execution of Charles I and during Cromwell's Protectorate. Ivankinsman (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately said section was a copyvio. Yoenit (talk) 22:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/biog/fairfax.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Yoenit (talk) 22:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pasažieru vilciens

message: In compiling the rolling stock list I had difficulty finding any reference to these new EMU's as shown here. I am not sure whether these are entirely new units or just refurbished old trains. If anyone has any info on these then please edit the rolling stock section accordingly LanarkLiberal 20:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the gallery is called "Modernised trains", I found an article on train modernisation in news archive of company's page, which mentioned that ER@ are going to be modernised ---- Xil/talk 15:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New EMUs?
Talk:Royalton, Pennsylvania

message: The map showing the borough's location in Dauphin County may not be ideal. Royalton sits right on the bank of the Susquehanna River but on this map it appears to be inland. "Appears" is the key word - at least in this particular area the political boundaries made by the Susquehanna are defined by its western shore, rather than the thalweg, so that Dauphin County extends all the way to the far shore. If Roylaton's borders DON'T reach to the other side this map may be accurate. (Actually, I'm sure it is.) The Susquehanna is something like a mile wide at this point - a massive landmark. I wonder if it might be helpful to somehow indicate the river on the little map. PurpleChez (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  map
Talk:Berrysburg, Pennsylvania

message: * I changed the importance because there isn't a large historical significance with this town. Neagley (talk) 22:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Barony of Roslin

message: There maybe too many Caithnesses in this before they split???Harrypotter 21:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: No such relationship existed; William had no such first cousin.  He had no aunt, either on maternal or paternal side, who married a Saint Clair.  Demanding that I find a source to disprove something that was made up in the first place puts the burden of proof on the wrong foot.  There is absolutely no basis in actual history, and a self-published web page that has clearly made it up is not a WP:RS. Agricolae (talk) 22:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative of WIlliam the Conqueror
Talk:Ondo State

message: I'm not quite following on the different geographic designations for Nigeria.  As I understand it, there are 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).  Also there are 774 Local Government Areas (LGA).  Working on Lagos showed me that there is both a City and a State with the same name.  My question is the link on this article under LGAs for Owo goes to what I would call the City or Town.  Is this the same as the LGA or is it something else?  Thanks.  --EarthPerson 22:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty much the same. Most of the time, the LGAs are named after their headquarters, which are cities or towns, and besides these cities or towns the LGAs include the surrounding country. It is standard practice not to create articles on both the LGA and its capital, because the effort would be more or less duplicated. Picaroon (Talk) 22:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay.  Thanks.  --EarthPerson 23:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owo as a Local Government Area 

message: With all due respect, I don't see that Oakinrinlola's wording is any more mordern than what it replaced. —Tamfang (talk) 02:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  mordernised?
Talk:Osney

message: The two pubs are now called the hollybush and the punter (despite the fact that no punts are ever used on this stretch of the river, it's too deep)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.247.34 (talk) 15:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of lieutenant governors of Illinois

message: I've changed the silly listing of "unknown" "acting" Lt. Govs.  When a Lt. Gov died or succeeded to the Illinois governorship (prior to the 1970 Constitution), then the office was simply vacant.  I'm sure the state Senate had provisions for a presiding officer in such a case, but that didn't make said person the "acting Lt. Governor"  Unschool (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try not to be offended by your comment. Maybe "thanks for turning my simple numbered list into a very comprehensive table" would have been more appropriate than calling 3 items silly six months after it was changed. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I use "silly" because I consider it to be inoffensive; maybe I should reconsider my use of the word.  Certainly no offense was intended.  And yes, of course, you do deserve thanks for doing what I could not have done with the list.  Thank you. I suppose I should view your experience as a precursor to the lack of gratitude that I should expect for turning this into this?  (Actually, I don't know if others would regard it as an improvement or not, but I do wonder if there will be any feedback from people who have contributed to this page in the past.)  Anyway, sorry for rubbing you the wrong way; I do recognize that you're a great editor.  Cheers. Unschool (talk) 00:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting Lt. Gov unknown? 
Talk:Vambery – Vámbéry

message: The article says "Vambery is the last name" of two Hungarians.  Would someone who knows reword that?  Doesn't a Hungarian surname come before the given name? Though I have met Hungarian expatriates in countries where surname comes last following that convention for the benefit of the natives. --SilasW 21:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of names
Talk:This Is a Low

message: On July 16 2008 I re-instated this page, I think it most certainly is a notable song; it is voted the second best song by the band on Rate Your Music, a highly referenced site- moreover and most importantly, it was the only album track to feature on Blur's Best Of album. The mere fact that it is included on the official Best Of of one of the world's biggest bands warrants an article in itself. That it is backed by so many valuable references means there is no reason why this page should be removed. Any trouble, drop me a line on my talk page. Dsims209 (talk) 20:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-instating this page
Talk:Three Stars (song)

message: Not sure if this is where I put this, but there seems to be an error in the intro: it reads that the album was released on "April 5, 1959, by Crest Records[...]However the song was off Billboard and the airways by March 30, 1959." Either the month or the year is wrong, but searching on Google I couldn't find a source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coreybchapman (talk • contribs) 10:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation

message: I expanded this article from source material and added infobox, uploaded logo, wrote building history section, added citations, and inserted links in Berlin State Museums, Berlin State Library back to this article. Ultracobalt (talk) 07:37, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion from Stub 

message: Hello all- I don't have time to incorporate this at the moment, but wanted to make note of this article for anyone who might: Germany Will Disband One of the Biggest Cultural Organizations in Europe in a Bid to Make Museums More Autonomous. Eric talk 13:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note re disbanding
Talk:Jan Josef Liefers

message: VÖLLIG IRRELEVANT! LÖSCHT DIESEN EITLEN HEUCHLER-PROPAGANDA-SCHEISS!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.227.205.183 (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liefers spricht bei der Berliner Großdemonstration am 4. November 1989? 
Talk:Bascom affair

message: This article needs editing, it is very interesting, but repeats itself and has contradictions in it.
after reading the Article I choose to read one of the external links and read on Militaryhistory..., but they tell a different Story: here in Wikipedia the Raid happend on Jan. 27, 1861, in Militaryhistory it occured in Oct. 1860 and some months "nothing happend in this case". Here the kidnapped Son is called Felix Ward; on Militaryhistory the Boy is called Mickey Free... etc.. this both Websites tell a different story about the same thing as far as I understand all this. Please forgive me my bad english, I hope I could express what I mean. -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 17:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

message: Greetings.  There were questions above about differing historical versions in different sources.  My initial primary issue was the opening paragraph discussing Cochise without mentioning who or what he was.  That, and a link, doesn't come up until two sections below. When reading other sources about the issue and the discrepencies, I decided I didn't feel qualified to edit this topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stvangel (talk • contribs) 20:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs some work
Talk:Nick Barker

message: I've added the NPOV tag because the article reads like a a self-promoting press release ("overwehelmingly evocative", "excellent reputation") and needs drastic pruning. Oscillon (talk) 03:50, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a go at making the article more neutral in tone. I've also supplied some more refs and applied a few style changes. I'm ready to have the NPoV tag removed.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done-it's much much better. I've removed the NPOV tag. Oscillon (talk) 06:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: PoV to NPoV
Talk:Lenny Baker

message: There is no documentation that Lenny Baker died as a result of AIDS-related cancer.  I recall that he died of thyroid cancer, but cannot cite that either. I am changing to the more neutral "cancer" now, without any details or qualifications.  If anyone can find a citation, feel free to throw it in.
- Likk9922 (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancer
Talk:To Love Somebody (song)

message: Close Another Door was the B-Side of To Love Somebody in both the USA and Canada.It wasn't I Can't See Nobody.I know this because I happen to have this single in my collection.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frschoonover (talk • contribs) 16:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding The B-Side(s) of this single

message: Contrary to popular opinion, "To Love Somebody" was not the song Barry Gibb had written for Otis Redding, but rather another song entitled "End of My Song" which never was released commercially. Because, the Bee Gees had actually released their original version of "To Love Somebody" as a single in the summer of 1967, and Redding, in fact, was still alive at the time of its release; he would die five months later.
Source: 
WikiPro1981X (talk) 06:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  End Of My Song 

message: Don’t know the details but it was a show that was honoring Barry Gibb and what a version with Keith playing a great guitar solo with Barry in the front road. Keith sang a wonderful version of “To Love Somebody” and stole the show with a choir backing him up. I’m just sending this to an admin or I would have done more research. 2601:484:8003:1BF0:CEF:10C6:40A:E3B1 (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keith Urban version. 

message: The Flying Burrito Brothers
Anthology  released 2000 2601:18E:8300:E810:2537:74B:B5B8:A452 (talk) 01:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover versions
Talk:Mound of the Hostages

message: Who first named it the "mound of the hostages", and when?86.42.200.149 (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, why? I vaguely recall something from my guided tour of the site about one Celtic tribe capturing warriors from another and imprisoning them here, essentially entombing them alive, though I think I also recall something about that some were eventually let free before they died of starvation, exposure, whatever. Is there any validity to this story? Someone with proper sources (not me, I'm a historian of Japan) should add something... Thanks! LordAmeth (talk) 17:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Origination
Talk:Treat Her Like a Lady (Diana King song)

message: Why is there no article for the 1985 Temptations of the same name. It was arguably more successful and popular, besides it came first so "Treat Her Like a Lady" should redirect to a Temptations song. 72.152.135.75 (talk) 00:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The hell is this?
Talk:Renault 12

message: In line with policy and guidelines (see WP:NOR and WP:ATT) I've removed a chunk of recently added info. I've copied it below in case anybody can find a usable reference for it so it can be included in some form. – Kieran T (talk) 21:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed original research

message: The Renault 12 was sold in mexico also, they're not too rare. Maybe worth mentioning along with other south american countries. It was probably sold here until 1984, when Renault left Mexico.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.146.62.38 (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mexico

message: I think I seen Renault 12 in a Maggie Mee TV commercial in the 80's. 14.192.214.53 (talk) 12:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but so what? They were a very common car in the '80s. If one appeared today in some retro-vintage style, that might make it to being noteworthy, or if there had been one in the '70s or '80s where it was pivotal to a TV series.  But a contemporary advert?  They have to film it with some sort of car.  Also a lot of US adverts around this time used what were obscure imports, with the badges hidden, just to avoid promoting a recognisable local brand. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:53, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Renault 12