Talk:Elmendorf Beast

message: This sentence from the original article made me laugh out loud:
”In this instance, the family that owned the house's large dogs would bark at it, but cried and whimpered when they were brought closer to the beast.“
Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 21:15, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:48, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any pictures of this thing? --clpo13 14:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this page had one, originally, but there were copyright issues and it was removed.  - TexasAndroid 17:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures? 

message: This article is a mess and could be much shorter.  A UT professor named Pamela Owen who is an expert in canine bones identified the skull as a normal coyote.  This article is grossly misleading, there's no mystery here.  I'm going to make some changes to reflect this this weekend.  Capeo 18:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be sure to reference your changes well, and there should be no problem, IMHO. - TexasAndroid 18:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Will do. Capeo 19:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I have it on tape, but have not watched it yet.  I'll see what it says and see what I can add from it when I get a chance to watch it. - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beast has long ago been IDed 

message: The article Chupacabra claims
"This creature is now known as the Elmendorf Creature. It was later determined to be a coyote with demodectic or sarcoptic mange."
Either this matter has been settled, then the Elmendorf Beast article should be changed accordingly, or the matter is still pending, then the Chupacabra should be changed to make clear that the mange-thing is only a theory. 88.217.71.229 16:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article contradicts another article 

message: This is not exactly a case of the "paranormal" since the beasts have gender and are possibly mutations, diseased specimens or a new species.  Nothing about this event suggests it is of a paranormal source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.5.135.66 (talk) 21:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paranormal 

message: One of the local TV stations is running blurbs that they have the official DNA results back on this, and will be presenting the results tonight in the local newscast.  They're hyping it as results on a Chupacabra, but the images shown were definitly the Elmendorf Beast.  We'll see what they have to say, and especially if they put the report up on their web site, I will hopefully be able to update with the results tomorrow. - TexasAndroid 19:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK.  Not the Elmendorf Beast, but a similar animal found this past July in Cuero. I'll see what, if anything, this latest information will add to the current article. - TexasAndroid 14:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local update 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Elmendorf Beast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051026021126/http://www.nbc4.tv/news/4895053/detail.html to http://www.nbc4.tv/news/4895053/detail.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified