Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Science and academia

message: Your help may be needed on Talk:Lucretius, regarding part of the article that may be falsified information. Renerpho (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible hoax on [[Lucretius]] (Level 4 vital article) 

message: I have nominated Harold Innis for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR for Harold Innis 

message: Could some members of S&A take a look at :Harry Tschopik Jr. and assess it per :WP:BIO and :WP:NACADEMIC. The article was created by a student of :Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University of Maryland/Introduction to Archives and Digital Curation (Fall 2023), who moved it to the article namespace themselves. So, it never got vetted by :WP:AFC or anyone else more experienced at creating articles. The subject seems Wikipedia notable from the article content, but there's really only two sources that appear to be :WP:SECONDARY cited, with the remaining sources attribute to the subject of the article. I tried to do some rudimentary clean up, but I didn't find much more about the subject in a Google search. I only went a few pages deep into the search results, but nothing that looked like :WP:SIGCOV jumped off the page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:49, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a bit more digging and found  a book written by David Price (anthropologist) that seems to imply that Tschopik might've been an FBI :Special Intelligence Service agent during World War II, which would probably be something worth mentioning in the article if true. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Tschopik Jr. 

message: Percy Lavon Julian has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 08:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Percy Lavon Julian]] 

message: Marian Breland Bailey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 10:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Marian Breland Bailey]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Elisabeth Burgos-Debray#Requested move 5 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 12:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Elisabeth Burgos-Debray#Requested move 5 March 2024]] 

message: I've looked through the older discussions on how to approach bibliographic sections ( ), it appears that there's no hard policy on this topic (I couldn't find one), so I'd ask for some advice here. A useful thing I've noticed on German Wikipedia is that the editors take care to link the scans of books and articles if they're public domain or under a similar open license, e.g. :de:August Leskien. Is this desirable on en.wp too? I've done that at Vatroslav Jagić and Atanasije Stojković (the latter having a mixture of fictional and scientific content). In the former article I also regularly included translations of the work-titles in brackets, as the scholar barely published in English, although I'm not sure if such data is truly needed (whoever knows the language and would wish to find and read the original book can understand the title anyway), and it might take up too much space. What is the best approach here? — Phazd (talk|contribs) 00:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of publications: advice 

message: Hello everybody!
I recently have been edited the page on Catherine Emihovich all by myself. Any help would be appreciated as I don't have much experience with wikipedia. If you were wondering she was the 12th Dean at the University of florida. I went to their talk page but it shut down. Once again anything is appreciated. Shane emihovich (talk) 19:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Shane emihovich, this page doesn't seem very active, you could ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red as they are usually helpful with editing women's biography articles. Also your username suggests that you may have a conflict of interest in editing the article, there is already some advice about this on your talk page. TSventon (talk) 15:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Catherine Emihovich 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Jason Baumgartner#Requested move 16 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Jason Baumgartner#Requested move 16 April 2024]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:José Mariano de Conceição Vellozo#Requested move 28 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:José Mariano de Conceição Vellozo#Requested move 28 April 2024]] 

message: You are invited to help improve Draft:Cyril deGrasse Tyson, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. ––FormalDude (talk) 08:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft article about Cyril deGrasse Tyson