lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Savoy Brown

message: Since I created the membership timeline on this page, the members section has been removed. I would think a simple members section would be useful on this page. Any objections? Burbridge92 (talk) 09:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members section 

message: Didn't this group ever score a single hit single? I doubt it. In fact, the [Attic internet radio station] just played "Run to me", which made it to #68 in 1981 in the Billboard Hot 100. 83.87.140.201 (talk) 19:30, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles 

message: There are a number of areas where an inline citation would be helpful. I don't have the time to examine the sources in the article to do them, but perhaps the original author would be willing to do the work necessary. Also, some statements indicating "current" activities may be questionable due to the nature of this type of article. As time passes things change and that may well be the case with these statements. I did not want to edit these as, again, I do not have the time nor interest necessary for this kind of work for this group. Bottom line, it's a good article that could be improved and a lot of work has already been done.THX1136 (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline citations needed 

message: How is their name pronounced? The Mo-Ja'al (talk) 06:30, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Just a suggestion: It may be a good idea to add a timeline of some sort as to approximately when the members were in the band, since this is a band with a lot of members over the years--one harmonica player, one percussionist, four keyboardists, eight guitarists, ten lead singers, eighteen drummers, nineteen bassists, and one Kim Simmonds the whole time. I made a rough mockup--let me know if you think this looks good. I didn't know certain things like the exact album release dates, which weren't listed on the page, so feel free to adjust it. 172.243.177.109 (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline?
Talk:Bell XV-3

message: When did the XV-3 have the wind tunnel accident and when did work on the project actually end? --Born2flie 07:05, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per Stephen Harding's book on US Army Aircraft, the first prototype was damaged beyond economical repair (cause unstated) in 1956. Joint US Army/AF testing on second prototype ended in 1962, after which the XV-3 was tranferred to NASA. That's all I have tonight, but I'll keep looking. - BillCJ 07:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When 

message: I have tried to add some missing statistics, but the template doesn't seem to want to recognize some like chord, or the fact that the XV-3 had two sets of rotors of different diameters. Can someone more familiar with templates take a look?  I have left the data in place, even though it doesn't show in the current article. Mark Sublette (talk) 19:22, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't a way to include the additional information in the template the way you had formatted it. Where it was able to be included, I have edited the information. I used the three-bladed rotor information even though the aircraft is restored to the two-bladed model, because it was the three-bladed model that created the envelope and successfully made the transitions. --Born2flie (talk) 15:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats template
Talk:Barloworld (cycling team)

message: The "Barloworld" page should be renamed "Team Barloworld", as Barloworld is the company which sponsors the cycling team. Interweave 05:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The official name of the team is Barloworld so, if it were to be renamed anything, I'd prefer Barloworld (cycling team). As it is, disambiguation is unnecessary as no article on the company exists. If one did, then Barloworld would be a disambiguation page pointing to the company and cycling team. Until there is an article on the company, this is just hypothetical. Mk3severo 09:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reaching a page about a cycling team when you look up a large company is very confusing. Barloworld (cycling team) is probably the best proposal, the current situation is very confusing. Note that the cycling team's site is located at http://www.teambarloworld.com/ . 198.54.202.102 (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But there's still no page on the company, so Barloworld would redirect to Barloworld (cycling team) (or as I now think is better Barloworld cycling team) anyway. SeveroTC 21:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Really? Mauricio Soler has the KOM for this year's Tour clinched, won a stage just as Hunter had, and got a combativity award along with lots of media coverage. I'd say it's a push, perhaps even favoring Soler. Is there some other justification for saying Hunter is the most prominent? Nosleep1234 09:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No arguments here, probably just old text from the start of the year when nobody had really heard of Soler. Félix Cárdenas has also won a stage in the Tour before, but he's hasn't achieved so much of late.  SeveroTC 12:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Barloworld's most prominent rider is South African Robert Hunter."
Talk:Scarlet (British band)

message: The UK group Scarlet consisted of Jo Youle and Cheryl Parker. Somehow, the names of the members of group 'Scarlet Carson' have overwritten an otherwise correct description of Scarlet.  
62.137.136.194 00:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names changed 

message: Over on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarlett_and_Black somebody's attributed "I Wanna Be Free (To Be With Him)" to an 80s male/female pop duo. That's a mistake right, rather than a cover of a band with a similar name?86.187.171.145 (talk) 01:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused with Scarlett and Black?
Talk:Ceramica Flaminia

message: If anything, their website seems to suggest the team's name is "Flaminia-Bossini" - Their Merry Christmas message says "Il Team Flaminia-Bossini" and so does the giant logo in the top left corner of the screen. So, why was this moved to "Ceramica Flaminia?" I know I accidentally went to the website of the bathroom tile company Ceramica Flaminia first, maybe that's why? *shrug* Nosleep (Talk · Contribs) 01:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team name
Talk:Rockwell XFV-12

message: The file :File:599278main a 4-8 maciej zborowski2 full.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:599278main a 4-8 maciej zborowski2 full.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 08:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:599278main a 4-8 maciej zborowski2 full.jpg]] 

message: Got some stuff on this aircraft here. Would be helpful, because it's not really clear what the article means when it says "nozzles in the wings". I also don't see where the "venetian blinds" come in, since there are clearly long, shallow, rotating nozzles in the centers of each wing. That's not how it's described in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnaGoFast (talk • contribs) 05:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures and info 
Talk:Kelme (cycling team)

message: According to the spanish site, the name is Comunidad Valenciana. See :es:Comunidad_Valenciana Kleuske 20:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a confusing one for me. I originally named the article Comunidad Valenciana, but this was renamed bringing the name into line with what is actually printed onto the teams shirts - Comunitat Valenciana. I have a feeling - although since I don't speak Spanish or Catalan I don't know - that Comunidad is the Spanish spelling and Comunitat is the Catalan/Valencian spelling. The official website at http://www.team-cv.com/portal/ uses the -tat spelling in all the logos and text, although confusingly uses the -dad spelling in the page title! Mk3severo 21:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the article is wrong 
Talk:Grumman OV-1 Mohawk

message: The 3-view drawing under Specifications shows an OV-1A with original short wings (span 42 ft) common also to the OV-1C. Also, article does not sufficiently detail that the extended wings (span 48 ft) were fitted to basic OV-1B and OV-1D variants (see Aerofiles.com etc). I've tried amending the 3-view image File: syntax in accordance with editing help article to add a relevant caption, but no visual change displayed in Preview - can someone help with suitable edit(s). MTIA, PeterWD (talk) 15:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If I understand what you want to do, you must add the bold text to the following syntx: . --McChizzle (talk) 22:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that does work. However, my new citation doesn't seem to work (I got it from another Grumman article) :-) PeterWD (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. The citation template sucks; I never use it. --McChizzle (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications OV-1D but 3-view shows OV-1A 

message: Airworthy list very much out of date. Mohawk Technologies who owned several of these appears to be out of business; their website mohawk-tech.com no longer exists. The example that was owned by the Carolina Air Museum is now at the Hickory Air Museum (see their site); while it may be airworthy it doesn't appear to have flown since arriving at Hickory. Raywode (talk) 18:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airworthy list very much out of date.
Talk:Scottish Chamber Orchestra

message: I took it out, and the article reads much less like an advertisement, if drier as a result. DJRafe (talk) 00:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A considerable improvement!  --Deskford (talk) 00:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert-like text
Talk:Landbouwkrediet–Colnago

message: Otherwise the parenthetical qualifier is unnecessary. Nosleep (Talk · Contribs) 23:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's have something on this "70 year old Belgian bank" then 
Talk:Bell XV-15

message: Shouldn't this article have a few words about the development into the V-22?  Hcobb (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is in raw condition.  Some V-22 text was added to the bottom of the Dev section. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  V-22 
Talk:Bellot Strait

message: I was under the impression, McClintock with the Fox was the first to pass through Bellot Strait -- especially since the article quoted for Gall's achievements, while mentioning his courageous passage, seems nowhere to claim Gall's journey was a first. Am I missing something? -- Syzygy (talk) 10:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gall was first? 
Talk:Immortal DNA strand hypothesis

message: Strand immortality, if it occurs, could compromise epigenetic fidelity. I have recently published in "PLoSGenetics"  a mathematical model to examine this possibility. Please see (Genereux 2009) for details.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kale1674 (talk • contribs) 07:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Epigenetic Implications 

message: I am no expert on stem cells but recently read this paper: 
Steinhauser, M. L.; Bailey, A. P.; Senyo, S. E.; Guillermier, C.; Perlstein, T. S.; Gould, A. P.; Lee, R. T.; Lechene, C. P. Multi-Isotope Imaging Mass Spectrometry Quantifies Stem Cell Division and Metabolism. Nature 2012, 481 (7382), 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10734.
There a different approach was used and no evidence supporting the immortal strand hypothesis were found. Could someone qualified please look at it and if found valid include it in the article? Furthermore, most cited papers are before 2010 and what is the current research opinion in 2023? 137.120.191.170 (talk) 15:00, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A counterexample to the hypothesis
Talk:LPR (cycling team)

message: I think we should move the team name to "De Rosa-Stac Plastic", because the team has the same team managers and quite the same roster of 2009. LegendK (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As per this and this, they are different teams. SeveroTC 12:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Screaming Lord Sutch and the Savages

message: There is a link for "Charlie Parker" being a member of the band in 1960, however, the link is for "Charlie Parker", the US jazz musician who died in 1955  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.214.77 (talk) 09:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie Parker clarification
Talk:Bell X-5

message: How is it that the X-5 didn't weigh all that much with swing-wings, and the later designs such as the F-111, and F-14 weighed so much? AVKent882 (talk) 01:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They were much bigger airframes. - BilCat (talk) 08:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Swing-Wing Weight
Talk:Secret Shine

message: This is the first expansion of this article out of stub status. Infobox provided.
Gardener of Geda 17:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First post-stub entry. 
Talk:United States Fleet Forces Command

message: U.S. Atlantic Fleet → United States Atlantic Fleet – To parallel the other United States fleet articles by deabbreviating. Caerwine Caer’s whines 01:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: * Support, as per my nomination above. Caerwine Caer’s whines 01:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *I've moved the page. —Mets501 (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2020/12/02/navy-bringing-back-us-atlantic-fleet/
BlueD954 (talk) 04:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, already noted just above and in the article, thanks. - wolf 05:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: ,  thanks for the heads-up. This is surprising. Do note however that the putative plan to recreate First Fleet in (Singapore?) has been severely criticised US Navy Secretary’s proposal met with raised eyebrows from observers, who say the plan is a ‘trial balloon’ that is unlikely to garner immediate regional support -- severe questions as to whether it will go ahead -- and as a last-minute Trump Admin move, the renaming of FFC to Atlantic Fleet once more may also be blocked. Buckshot06 (talk) 10:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , yeah, but they're already in Singapore, so who knows...? The FFC rename makes sense, but again (as you pointed out), this is DC, so who knows...? Guess we'll have to wait until the early spring after the transition dust settles. Cheers - wolf 17:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  To be Atlantic Fleet again
Talk:White Hall High School

message: I don't really know what I'm doing, so any help would be greatly appreciated.  Sorry, I'm new to this and this is my first article. Acornsr4squirrels 01:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have categorized this page as requested by Category needed. If anyone has a more accurate category for this article, please feel free to add in the necessary details. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:35, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorized
Talk:Convair X-12

message: The line According to a 2001 article in Code One Magazine by Lockheed, No X-12 was ever built or flown. does not make any sense. Could someone who has read this article comment on if this correct or  what it should read?
http://history.nasa.gov/monograph31.pdf 
X-12 no build.--Los688 (talk) 13:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'No X-12 was ever built or flown'?
Talk:Shadowland (band)

message: Where does the information about the 2009 re-releases including bonus tracks come from? I can't find any evidence of any of these albums having been re-released since the Verglas reissues from the late 1990s, neither on Discogs nor on Prog Metal Archives, and the band homepage is down. 2A02:908:8B2:1940:71F1:F4D8:38CB:9DE7 (talk) 12:54, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Shakatak

message: This article is in need of some reliable sources, and less whimsical fancruft, to bring it up to an encyclopedic standard.  The general drift of the comments above still apply.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:57, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2010

message: 82.74.152.166 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official site & Album-contents
Talk:Bell X-16

message: The article states that the X-16 was cancelled in favor of "the  Martin RB-57 in 1956".
My understanding is that the Bell X-16 was competing with the Fairchild for the Air Force reconnaissance plane contract, and won the contract. (My father hand carried the contract to Bell Offices).
The contract was cancelled within days, due to the completion of the Lockheed U2.  The U2 development, up to that point was not disclosed to the Air Force or either team competing for the contract.
https://medium.com/war-is-boring/before-the-u-2-spy-plane-there-was-the-x-16-536e17d0ae2b
 AirHistory198 (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bell X-16 history
Talk:The Shapeshifters

message: Made some small changes/additions to links:
Official site (German content) - added "German content" since this site's text seems to be all in German language
Official MySpace page - added this link
Positiva Records - this is their record label
Nocturnal Groove - previously read "record label", it is actually their management company
Sibruk 15:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to links 

message: Hello I have just updated The Shapeshifters singles and unfortunately User:ClueBot_NG removed my content maybe because I didn't manage to make proper columns in the table. Can somebody help me please ? Thanks.  Irving Quirarte (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I still need someone to fix it thanks. Irving Quirarte (talk) 14:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK thats OK now Irving Quirarte (talk) 20:25, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles removed in the table 
Talk:Silicon Teens

message: Why are popular culture articles so poorly written? I mean, take any book, album, artist, flim, or tv show and you can be pretty much assured that it will sound as though it were written by a high school freshman. Why did the originating author of this article choose the word "cheesy" to describe The Silcon Teens? Because he or she is trying to be cool, I suppose.  In my estimation, most of these articles are beyond useless. Worse, when one attempts to edit it so it sounds half-way professional, someone will come along and make it sound like nonsense again.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.24.43 (talk) 01:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Silver Sun

message: I vote for "are an English band". In british english they are considered to be a collective entity. Exxolon 19:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is/Are a band 

message: That is the correct spelling in British English (double 'l') and Silver Sun are a British band.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.177.227 (talk) 10:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why '[sic]' after 'modelled'? 

message: James Broad died of terminal cancer in October 2020https://www.nme.com/news/music/james-broad-of-silver-sun-has-died-2805582.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.130.30 (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: James Broad has died

message: It looks as though there were other band members not yet mentioned on this page, as this archived page lists Richard Kane and Merlin Matthews among the line-up. --Jameboy (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other band members
Talk:Piasecki X-49 SpeedHawk

message: The German article appears to have some newer info on it. Can anyone translate this? Thanks. --BillCJ 04:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: German page

message: December issue has the X-49 on the cover and this article:
*Colby, Steve. "R&D: Beneficial Bird", Rotor&Wing. December 2007. <http://www.aviationtoday.com/rw/issue/cover/17380.html>.
MLA citation reference included for convenience. Don't have the ISSN for Rotor & Wing. --Born2flie (talk) 21:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotor & Wing 

message: R&W has the first flight as 29 June 2007. HAI lists the same day, and Piasecki's news release does also. What a difference a day makes. --Born2flie (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First flight? 

message: It is not a helicopter, it is a gyrodyne.  I'll correct this. 213.78.183.91 (talk) 11:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a helicopter

message: The text says it's a U.S. Navy project, but the specs and infobox say Army. Which is it? - The Bushranger (talk) 23:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, teach me to speed-read! - The Bushranger (talk) 23:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Army or Navy? 
Talk:Simian (band)

message: "In 2006, "We Are Your Friends", a remix of their song "Never Be Alone" was released on a reactivated Virgin label called Ten Records."
What a terrible sentence.  I think it means that "We Are Your Friends" the album was released in 2006, but that is wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.200.195.33 (talk) 03:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006?
Talk:Boeing X-50 Dragonfly

message: I have started an informal merge/delete discussion at Talk:Canard Rotor/Wing — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:49, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canard Rotor/Wing 
Talk:Slaughter & the Dogs

message: * In his / her eagerness to delete what was thought of as 'trivia', Spylab also mucked up all the references (at the bottom of the page) from number 3 onwards. Also, sadly, the track 'Cranked Up Really High' does not appear on numerous compilations. The Paul Morley compilation is also noteworthy because of the prior statements in the article regarding the Manchester punk scene. (The compilation in question being an overview of Manchester's, and Liverpool's, punk, new wave and post-punk). Yozzer66 (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References to Compilations

message: This diff updates current members. It would be good to 1) be reffed, 2) be included in the body. Wwwhatsup (talk) 10:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm curious... why isn't ed garrity in the infobox as a former member? duncanrmi (talk) 11:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That entry was removed by Wayne's IP with this edit, I just restored it. Robman94 (talk) 19:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current members 
Talk:Carst Posthuma

message: Dutch cricket team says Posthuma was the first Dutchman to play first-class cricket, but unfortunately does not give a source. Loganberry (Talk) 01:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

message: :I'll try and dig one out. The best I can do for now is the list of Dutch players at Cricket Archive  which would involve trawling through every player in the list to find out the information, so it's hardly a direct source. He definitely was though. Andrew nixon 17:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Slik

message: The opening paragraph is gibberish.  Would someone who has either the time, or the inclination, put it right?  Skinsmoke (talk) 01:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph 
Talk:Smith & Mighty

message: Rob Smith history has a lot of overlap with Smith & MIghty. Further, is notoriety is also tangling up with the group. His solo and other work can be included in group article. Jonpatterns (talk) 09:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support , feel free to merge, no objections in 3 months. Boleyn (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Rob Smith