lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies

message: What are we doing here again? Is it so important that your view appears in the title page? DJ Clayworth 22:40, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The second deletion debate for this article (from July 6 to July 18 2004) may be found at Talk:Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies/delete -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 20:27, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD (2)

message: We've finished the Western betrayal project and moved it to the main Wikipedia namespace. It is not yet finished, but the main part of it is ready enough to be commented. I'd suggest redirecting this article there. However, before editing the Western betrayal article please be so kind as to read my comments at the top of the talk page. Halibutt 12:58, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
: I agree with redirect idea. The new version is much better, both in having better information and sources and in being more NPOVed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 13:34, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Western betrayal]] 

message: Would there be any objections if I were to create a redirect to Western Betrayal from this article? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 09:46, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Terry Hart

message: Page reverted from copyvio given reference to , still requires wikification though. -- Graham  :) | Talk 22:14, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This site  says he is married to a  Wendy Marie Eberhardt with two children, the claim that he was married to the tv presented has been disputed at the BLPN here  , so I have moved it here, feel free to cite and replace. moved content .. He was also previously married to American television personality Mary Hart.  Off2riorob (talk) 20:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed content
Template talk:North Atlantic Treaty Organization

message: Change "Chairman of the NATO Military Committee" to "Chair of the NATO Military Committee". Role's title has changed per  SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 15:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 19 May 2021 

message: Add NATO global partners under "Multilateral relations". XA1dUXvugi (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 20:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add NATO global partners 

message: Hello. Seeing as NATO is an alliance of nations, shouldn't the links in the "Members" tab link to the Member states page rather than that of their respective armed forces? (e.g.: Albania instead of Albanian Armed Forces) Aigle Lyrique (talk) 14:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to NATO members 

message: Please add a link to the symbol NATO Star. - Sigsjak (talk) 19:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  21:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Add NATO Star
Talk:Astroturfing

message: Hello, sorry there has not been a discussion opened on this before. The sources do not confirm the "astroturf" nature of Jexodus. Please find sources which can support this assertion before considering its addition here. I am confident that there are plenty of political astroturfing examples that are more robust and well-documented that could be put in its stead. Thank you. 2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 07:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: From the Esquire ref (currently ref #55):  and the Times of Israel ref (currently ref #56):  But since you asked so nicely, I've added an additional ref to GQ (currently ref #54): , which almost exactly matches the definition of astroturfing in the first sentence of the lede in this Wikipedia article. Mojoworker (talk) 18:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jexodus 

message: I have no data to support this, but I suspect that a percentage of memes which appear to be the work, often (deliberately?) clumsy, of ‘civilians’, are in fact astroturfing efforts. --2001:44B8:3102:BB00:D8BD:B78:CA71:AFC2 (talk) 09:04, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too. jp×g 10:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meme world 

message: ‘The authors argued that astroturfing that is "purposefully designed to fulfill corporate agendas, manipulate public opinion and harm scientific research represents a serious lapse in ethical conduct."
They actually used the word ‘purposefully’ instead of ‘purposely’? I would have corrected this, had it been part of the article’s text.
My trust in the content of any written work diminishes in proportion to the sloppiness of its prose. --2001:44B8:3102:BB00:D8BD:B78:CA71:AFC2 (talk) 09:32, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misquoted ?
Talk:Minas Tirith

message: @Chiswick Chap: Academic sources: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/20/article/182557/summary , https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol13/iss2/8/ and https://www.jstor.org/stable/26810634 suggest this is likely notable. I suggest restoring even now and tagging with  if you don't have time to add an analysis section quickly. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I've given it a go, using those and other sources that I've been collecting over the past few years. It's quite a substantial article, and surprisingly different in character from Gondor even though they inevitably share some materials. I'll reduce the MT section of Gondor to a summary with "main" link now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable? Restore?
Talk:Archduke Eugen of Austria

message: Said on Wikipedia:Images with missing articles, to have an image at [ http://www.lib.utexas.edu/photodraw/portraits/index.html] -- Nunh-huh 01:58, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Text probably copied from here: http://www.austro-hungarian-army.co.uk/biog/erzeugen.htm. Akela3 00:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of text
Talk:Political history of France

message: The first section before the TOC is far from NPOV for obvious reasons. Would someone mind fixing it and writing a better introduction? Guanaco
: Ok. That's why it was in italics: it's the French Constitution's introductory sentence.:-) Point taken. David.Monniaux 16:29, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: I removed the following. The statistical information is interesting & should be replaced, but not in such a way as to present it as corruption. It is far from being either corruption or favoritism (by itself), but is simply a feature of the national system, which may or not be appproved:
Political corruption and favoritism has been an issue in modern politics as well; by 1988, 96 percent of French politicians held office simultaneously in different levels of government in a practice known as cumul des mandats (REF: Gildea, Robert. France Since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pg. 240)
Tazmaniacs 13:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cumul des mandats is not corruption!
Talk:Homosexual behavior in animals

message: Change "[...]an animal exhibits homosexual behavior or even samee-sex sexual behavior" to "[...]an animal exhibits homosexual behavior or even same-sex sexual behavior" Gogetasj4 (talk) 19:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you for reporting it. Nthep (talk) 19:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small typo on the section: "Applying the term homosexual to animals" 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jrerkens (talk) 14:35, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Diversity of Sex

message: In accordance with WP:BRD, the description has been removed, seemingly unilaterally.  I believe the description to be entirely appropriate, and am about to revert the removal. Now we are discussing it. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:33, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Short Description
Talk:The Rest of the Story

message: The last line of this article told about a James Burke television show.  That seems to have nothing to do with the topic of the article.  So I deleted it.
If it does have some connection, please put it back and explain a little.
JBFrenchhorn 02:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Burke 

message: Is the show still on the air? The article goes from present tense to past tense. -Brougham96 (talk) 01:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense 

message: the article states that the revelations were usually the identity of the protagonist.  What is the source for this claim?Kdammers (talk) 02:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surprise endings
Talk:Jenny Lives with Eric and Martin

message: I changed the date of the Daily Mail's campaign against this book to 1983 from 1987. By 1987, Section 28-like bills were already being drafted and it would be too late to have been a cause of Section 28. See  for detailed account from the author herself.
Also, I copied some of the text of this document into my essay on Section 28, if you don't mind - if it really was the original cause of Section 28 it's just too important to leave out. --Axon 16:45, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moral Panic in 1983 

message: Apparently, "one photo showed the child in bed with the naked adult men"... -- AnonMoos (talk) 19:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omission
Talk:Starsky & Hutch (film)

message: ==Untitled==
Sorry to move the page yet again — but (movie) tag or no, the film still takes an ampersand. - Sara 06:18, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: &

message: Sorry to move the page yet again — but (movie) tag or no, the film still takes an ampersand. - Sara 06:18, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *I think that the original Huggy Bear may have made a cameo at the end, where the original Starsky and Hutch are.  I believe he's the one talking to the two prostitutes saying he is a personal friend of Huggy Bear, but I can't be sure.  Anyone got any info on that? Spartacusprime 15:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huggy Bear cameo? 

message: that can't be right. this movie did not cost more than a billion dollars, plus those numbers are obviously fake. and theres a comma missing. fixit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.147.32 (talk) 04:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget 

message: Why is Ed Roney's opinion about this movie given his own paragraph. It also says almost nothing new about the general consensus on the movie. I believe it should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.222.146 (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:The Magnificent Ambersons

message: I've always thought that this story (which of course I know through the Orson Welles film, not the long-forgotten source novel) contains more than a few echoes of Thomas Mann's Buddenbrooks (1901), also the story of how a family (haute bourgeois in their case) goes from dominance to near destitution, including loss of the family mansion, over the course of a generation or two.
Is there any evidence that Tarkington was influenced by the older story? Surely worth mentioning if there is, or if published critics have made such a comparison.Paulturtle (talk) 00:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddenbrooks
Talk:Kmart

message: According to the most reliable news sources as of right now, there are 6 Kmarts left, including 2 in the continental U.S. (Bridgehampton, New York and Miami, Florida). Regarding the others, there are an estimated 4 in existence (3 in the U.S. Virgin Islands, 2 in St Thomas and 1 in Saint Croix, plus 1 in Guam. This is confirmed by the latest update from Brostocks https://brostocks.com/2023/08/03/how-many-kmarts-are-left-in-the-united-states/#google_vignette and a Google Maps search seems to confirm this, although they leave out 1 particular Kmart apparently located at Sunshine Mall in St. Croix that Google Maps says in still open, but according to reliable sources, has just shut down in June (https://viconsortium.com/vi-business/virgin-islands-kmart-west-is-closing-mall-owner-says-redevelopment-plan-will-provide-first-rate-center). In any case, I highly doubt there are still 8 Kmarts left, so I am not sure why the admins are insisting on leaving an outdated and possibly biased source from April 2022 as the most reliable measure of how many Kmarts are left. Additionally, the number of Kmarts still existing in April 2022 per Brostocks was 10, so the source makes no sense one way or the other. In any case, the current number must be updated. And yes, Brostocks is a reliable source, it actively tracks retail closures throughout the U.S. Anderswarr (talk) 05:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Brostocks is a WordPress blog that falls under WP:SPS and nothing I can find about it gives any indication that it is a reliable source for the purposes of Wikipedia. That particular link cites this Forbes contributor article as an indication of its reliability, but that article falls under WP:FORBESCON and is similarly unreliable. - Aoidh (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Brostocks has been brought up here before, check the archives. As Aoidh says it is someone's blog and not a WP:RS. Their numbers are regularly incorrect, which is unsurprising because they rely on store locators which are unreliable and usually out of date. Re:  We have no deadline here, we can afford to wait until an actual reliable source comes along with an updated number. MrOllie (talk) 13:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nov. 2023 update 

message: I think 11/23/1977 should be changed to 1/25/1962, The Kmart test store in San Fernando, CA opened that date. 120.28.224.231 (talk) 13:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change unusual date 

message: The redirect 29600 Ford Avenue has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 02:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:29600 Ford Avenue]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Knights of the Cross with the Red Star

message: well written and balanced --Capekm (talk) 03:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Lincos language

message: Isn't it properly LINCOS? 75.18.210.218 17:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  It's all-capitalized LINCOS only on the cover.  Everywhere inside -- and even on the list of books by the publisher on the back cover -- it is written first-letter-capitalized Lincos.  The all-capitalized version is just typographical emphasis since it's the book title on the cover. Xihr 20:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: Paragraph 1 of the section "Concepts and range (sic)" states:
"he shows binary notation for numbers . = 1, . . = 2 and so on"
This statement is self-contradictory, as the number system being demonstrated appears to be unary, not binary.
73.53.109.183 (talk) 05:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binary? 

message: The following references might be useful for further development, and citations, for the article if so used:
* https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/view/2098 (available via Wikipedia library)
* https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/04/math-language-extraterrestrials/477051/
* https://philpapers.org/rec/FRELDO or https://www.jstor.org/stable/685401 (1961 paper by Hans describing Lincos)
* https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=V-zpCH3MObAC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=lincos&ots=KO3CrEzPlj&sig=XezrU5R6FozJ6To_N-c821arzms#v=onepage&q=lincos&f=false
* https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.IAC-04-IAA.1.1.2.07 
Cheers, -- • Apollo468•  00:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:James "Bubber" Miley

message: I cut this from the article: "He performed on the first recording session with blues singer Bessie Smith." Yes, according to Clarence Williams and Sidney Bechet, they made a never-issued recording session for Okeh Records. No copies of any test pressings are known to exist, alas. I'm not sure we should mention this in the article unless we wish to give enough details to explain why this recording isn't on any of the reissues of Smith's recordings. -- Infrogmation 11:14, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Philippa of Lancaster

message: Sorry, but her mother wasn´t Blanche of Castile!
Blanche was the daughter of the Duke of Lancaster.
John of Gaunt´s 2nd wife Constance, was called
Queen of Castile...
The worst thing is that her daughter wasn´t this Isabela, the link is wrong!
Isabela, the Duchesse de Bourgogne, not the Queen of Portugal!
Ahem, the first paragraph has two errors. Firstly, her younger brother who became King was named Henry. There wouldn't be a James of England for 200 years. Secondly, her mother didn't die in 1369 which makes me wonder how much else is accurate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkhaip (talk • contribs) 01:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should there be more information about Philippa raising her children.  In his book on Henry, Peter Russell goes into fair depth about her relgious raising and education of her children, especially the boys. Mattbaker55 (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:Ancestor

message: This belongs in a dictionary, not an encyclopedia. --Eequor 12:25, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: Progenitor redirects here, but there is no mention of the word, its meaning or its relation to Ancestor at all. (If I had a good understanding of this I would add it) - GeiwTeol 23:10, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The redirect I followed was a link from Massive Attack. The use of the word was, however not the same as the meaning of Ancestor in the genetic sense. I have since made the link point to the wiktionary entry in stead, which has a better explanation. - GeiwTeol 23:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progenitor 

message: This Ancestor article is frequently linked in other articles from the word "ancestry." It would be helpful if an expert could add a sentence in the intro immediately following the first one that reads "Ancestry is . . ." 5Q5 (talk) 14:53, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly agree. Is, for example, an American with one Italian grandparent of Italian ancestry? Is he/she an Italian American? Needs clarity. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:35, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could use Ancestry definition 

message: Classification of our ancestors 223.196.192.83 (talk) 13:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Intercept

message: This is simply a definition of intercept.  Wikipedia is not a dictionary.  --Eequor 12:42, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: The section about intercept in the military sense has links to Armor and Barrier.  The first links to armor worn on the body, but that is not what is being discussed; we don't seem to have an article for this link so maybe it should just be unlinked.  The second links to a disambig page but again there seems to be no relevant article.  --AndrewBuck 05:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed some links.--Patrick 09:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent work Patrick, and thank you for responding so quickly. --AndrewBuck 17:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military intercept links 

message: This phrase is used in the field of matrix mathematics, but I don't know what it means.  Can someone fill in?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Intercept terms"
Talk:Jean-Paul Belmondo

message: for the german page, I wrote a large article. perhaps someone can translate it. my english is too poor. --217.185.52.214 12:50, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: German to English

message: The link for Belmondo's father, the sculptor, clicks through to the page for his son.  If someone could fix that (I don't know how).
: Someone must have fixed it at some point. The Crab Who Played With The Sea (talk) 14:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Linkfix

message: Belmondo is described to be "of Italian origin" in this article, however he was born in France and even his father was born in Algeria.  So it can only be said that Belmondo's father was of Italian origin. Maikel (talk) 07:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it shouldn't be mentioned in the lead, unless it is relevant to his notability, per WP:OPERPARA. --Երևանցի talk  19:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian origin? 

message: The article says he broke his own nose to get out of military service. However, the citation provided does not say that definitively, only saying that it may have happened, or that it may have been broken elsewhere. Another source I found (in French) says an angry superior broke his nose as punishment for finding him asleep on guard. 24.227.239.22 (talk) 15:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broke his own nose?
Talk:Weapons of the Vietnam War

message: I found this statement on the internet, but I'm not sure what to think about it.
"The 3rd Colonial Commando Parachute Battalion drew German weapons from surrendered stocks (war reparations) for their 1948–50 tour in Indochina. Photos of MG 42s, Mausers, and MP-40s can be found in Cyril Bondroit’s book."
Is this true in any way? Does anyone have a book from mister "Cyril Bondroit" saying anything about this? TheJawaManiac (talk) 07:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't the MG-42 Used in the Vietnam War?
Talk:Digital sentience

message: I merged digital sentience into artificial consciousness NPOV (first attempt). It was easy to do word by word because of a structure of artificial consciousness NPOV version where different views are clearly separated. artificial consciousness NPOV was made based on the artificial consciousness article with everything essential (except two or three most recent additions) incorporated. My proposal is to make the merged article based on artificial consciousness NPOV version as it would result in more clear article with better structure. Tkorrovi 24 Mar 2004
The merger with artificial consciousness was done, the text in this article was copied almost word by word to artificial consciousness article. Should we now include #redirect artificial consciousness ? Tkorrovi 19:20, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Kranzberg's laws of technology

message: Do we really need to put this page and the page for "Melvin Kranzberg" on separate pages?  Both are pretty short.  I'd recomend a redirect or a merge, although my skills aren't good enough to try to implement one. Schrodinger82 06:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Looked it up with google. found 2 sourcess:
http://knowledgerush.com/kr/encyclopedia/Kranzberg%27s_Laws_of_Technology/
And
http://www.onpedia.com/encyclopedia/Kranzberg%27s-laws-of-technology
Both on 5 of March 2009, both stating the same:
Melvin Kranzberg's 6 Laws of Technology state:
    1st - Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral. 
    2nd - Necessity is the mother of Invention. 
    3rd - Technology comes in packages, big and small. 
    4th - Although technology might be a prime element in many public issues, nontechnical factors take precedence in technology-policy decisions. 
    5th - All history is relevant, but the history of technology is the most relevant. 
    6th - Technology is a very human activity, and so is the history of technology. 
References:
    * Kranzberg, Melvin. "Technology and History: 'Kranzberg's Laws.'" Technology and Culture 27 (1986): 544-560.
    * Kranzberg, M (1997) "Overview: Technology and History: Kranzberg's Laws", in Reynolds, TS and Cutcliffe, SH (Eds) Technology and the West: A Historical Anthology from Technology & Culture, University of Chicago Press.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ichtros (talk • contribs) 12:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a joker!