lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2004 South Korean legislative election

message: Readers who know Korean might like to keep an eye on the Korean press websites for actual vote numbers when they are posted. Chosun Ilbo has all sorts of numbers but none of them appear to be party vote totals, but since I know no Korean I might be wrong about this. Adam 02:13, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The file :c:File:Emblem of Korean Courts.svg used in this article has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
 Reason: I think time has come to finish the long-forgotten (or ignored) question: Is  free?  I doubt its freeness, based on the fact that we do not have definite answer for Template talk:KOGL#Free?. To save your click...    We, as of 2018, do not have a final answer for this. And this means, we have to delete these images, including some VIs and FPs. 
 Deletion request: link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 06:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons
Talk:Hydraulic rescue tool

message: There seems to be a discrepancy between the invention of the Hurst Tool between the introduction paragraph and the History section. The introduction has a 1963 date and the History says 1972. I got my start in the Fire/Rescue service in the mid 70's and remember departments making their first purchases of the tool during that time, so I lean more toward the 1972 date. Cutter-wike (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose that this page and Hydraulic spreader be merged. I think it's pretty obvious that the two pages are redundant; the question now is which name should be kept. While Jaws of Life has far more links, I think that the name should be something more generic, since the article says "The Jaws of Life products include hydraulic spreaders, cutters, rams, and other tools used for vehicle extrication," and, "The term has come to be used generically for any brand of these products, most often either spreaders or spreader/cutter hybrids, not just those manufactured by Hale Products." So it seems to me that this may be best served by a page detailing the range of rescue equipment, since it is unlikely that each type merits its own page. Sertrel 23:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Hydraulic spreader]]

message: Hi. I thought that this picture could be interesting for the article. The roof of the Renault Megáne Mark I has been cut off with Hydraulic Rescue Tools Randroide 09:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I attempted to address the "article needs cleanup" message.  I'll admit having no knowledge in this field, so mainly rearranged items and deleted headings and divisions I felt were overly technical or extraneous.  Please feel free to correct any mistakes! --Mdresser 19:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major cleanup

message: Hi,
just wanted to say that Lukas-Hydraulik GmbH is another company producing spreaders. (http://www.lukas.de)
Cheers,
::::Stefan.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.171.146.215 (talk) 15:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  another company 

message: When this article was originally created it was centered around 1 manufacturer Hurst.
I added in 2006 links to the other manufacturers websites to balance the article a bit.
Since then it seems that someone affiliated with Phoenix Rescue Tools has modified the page to be more one sided.
While the page in its current state is not as biased as it has been; it is also not as unbiased as it was and should be.
I don't believe Wikipedia should be a sales tool.  Lets provide some unbiased information.
--Malachite36 (talk) 07:26, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased Article??? 

message: The intro paragraph says "The Jaws of Life were first used in 1963 as a tool to free race car drivers from their vehicles after crashes" but the history section says "the tool reached the prototype stage of development in 1971". What did they use in '63 if the tool didn't even reach prototype stage until '71? --80.223.64.234 (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Device used 8 years before the first prototype?
Talk:University of Toronto Faculty of Information

message: This page needs to be changed to reflect the new faculty name in the title, although that will probably necessitate fixing pages that link to the FI(S) page.--PIngp0NG (talk) 15:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Umbilical vein

message: Shouldn't it be called umbilical artery?  dave 03:43, Apr 16, 2004 (UTC)
:No, it's the umbilical vein. The terms vein and artery indicate direction of bloodflow to or away from the heart, respectively—they are not related to the oxygen content of the blood contained within the vessel. Thus, even though the vessel carries oxygenated blood, it's still called the umbilical vein because it's carrying the blood to the heart from the placenta. (FYI, vessels that carry deoxygenated blood back to the placenta are called the umbilical arteries.) --Diberri | Talk 06:18, Apr 16, 2004 (UTC)
Dicrepancy here in whether the umbilical vein is obliterated within a week but can be used for venous catheterisation for several weeks after birth.  ??
Recanalization of the umbilical vein is a myth??
This study in 1985 disproves it, but the factoid seems to have persisted.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3881894  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.221.113.56 (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Truth/Archive 1

message: Can someone provide an explanation for why it makes sense to clump the coherence theory, the correspondence theory, and pragmatism under the single banner of the "epistemic conception"? About all these seem to me to have in common is that the contributors thus far to the article don't take them very seriously. --Ryguasu 06:33, 19 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "epistemic conception"
Talk:Coolie

message: The article mentions and links to the Anti-Coolie Act of 1862 signed into law by Abraham Lincoln. But the target page discusses a state, not a federal law (see the content dispute I just put up there, as well as the relevant discussion at Talk:Anti-Coolie_Act). Additionally, Google suggests the CA law was signed into law by California Governor Leland Stanford, not Lincoln. I will try to do some work to untangle this later if I get a chance. Does anyone have further information about this and could provide some clarification?
Thanks, Caleb Stanford (talk) 01:07, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Linked a citation to an academic article that suggests that it was in fact Lincoln who signed it into law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197580080.003.0006. Anekc11 (talk) 18:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lincoln or Leland Stanford? 

message: Did the Indians help stop slave trade in East africa 102.218.38.146 (talk) 14:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian coolies
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative medicine

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Medicinal fungi#Requested move 31 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 18:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Medicinal fungi#Requested move 31 January 2024]]
Talk:Particle-induced X-ray emission

message: Steven Jones in the Alex Jones documentary Terrorstorm mentions this method as one alleged proof of his thermite theory (controlled demolition of the Twin Towers). Perhaps that could be mentioned in this article as a current affairs reference to this technology? __meco 18:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steven Jones reference 

message: Shouldn't this be moved to Particle-induced X-ray emission in accordance with Wikipedia's naming conventions? – ukexpat (talk) 17:25, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 
Talk:Table of vowels

message: When I click the link to the sound file, I hear the vowel once. If I click the play button, I hear the vowel twice with a slight pause in between. I am using Firefox 3.5.2 on Windows Vista. Geekdiva (talk) 12:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sound Files Skipping

message: Despite being very short, I think this could be a Featured list.  Can someone add some references? -- ALoan (Talk) 00:22, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FLC]]
Talk:Lü Jie

message: If her English name is Amy Lu, why isn't the article there? WhisperToMe 23:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: English name
Talk:Utu (film)

message: I have a copy of the original NZ version and the 'Redux' version. Without watching them side-by-side with a stopwatch, it looks to me as if they are very similar, with the main difference being a couple of scenes taken out. I can find something on the producers' much shorter 'international' cut that reckons that the structure is very different with, for example, the final bush trial scene spread throughout the film. Can anyone find a better comparison between the three versions? Lovingboth (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences between versions
Talk:Mark Turner

message: ----
While 198.79.44.170's characterization of "battle" is juvenile (this page was changed after a VfD listing), he is correct that there are a few well-known Mark Turners; none of which, by the way, are the unnoteworthy person this page was created for and then suspected of vanity.  Does this mean we turn this page into a disambig?  PilotPrecise 09:40, 16 April 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Geoff Murphy

message: Other websites are listing his date of birth as October 10, 1938, whilst imdb have June 13, 1946. Given these discrepancies we will require a reliable source for the information, I have left the date unchanged as I have no reason to prefer any one date over the others. Rje (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say this one is a pretty authoritative source: Honorary doc for NZ cinema's 'rascal of the realm' by Massey University. At the time of receiving his honorary doctorate, he was 75 years old; that means the 1938 year is correct. I'll change the article accordingly. Schwede66 04:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: Is the statement "Murphy became most renowned for his artistry in action, brilliance in knockabout comedy, and fusing genres" sufficiently encyclopaedic?  It reads more like promotion.Royalcourtier (talk) 07:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I've been correcting a lot of messed up, common name, Murphy's on IMDB in the last day or two, moving credits from one incorrect Murphy to another correct Murphy (some will be pending for the next few days, as some corrections like profile merges are taking slightly longer than normal, going over their estimated processing date by a day or two), among other things to make it easier to find the British Murphy's I will no doubt be looking for again in future.
While updating those messed up Murphy profile's, I've noticed that a lot of the New Zealand ones are clearly related, as there seems to be around 5 Murphy's on each Geoff Murphy production.
Geoff Murphy is:
*The brother-in-law of Bruno Lawrence.
*The father of Paul Murphy, Matt Murphy, Linus Murphy, Miles Murphy and Robin Murphy.
*Kerry Robins is an uncle (yes uncle, not aunt) of Geoff's 5 kids (I'm not sure how yet).
*Pat Robins aka Pat Murphy is the mother of Kerry.
*Ella Coco Murphy is one of Paul's kids.
*Val Murphy is an unknown relative of the Murphy's.
Bruno Lawrence is:
* The father of Thad Lawrence, Melissa Lawrence and Veronique Lawrence.
* The husband of Veronica Lawrence.
Practically every family member I've noticed have credits missing, or need some of their credits (mainly their early credits) tweaking slightly, as they haven't added themselves exactly the same as they're listed on screen, so sometimes it can look more important than they are. Simple things like words being in the wrong order can make someone's role look more important, ie assistant director vs director's assistant.
Yet Geoff and Bruno's articles don't mention these filmmaking relatives or the fact that they're related to each other, never mind the success they've had themselves away from their father and uncles, at least one of which (Paul) easily qualifies for his own article, however I won't be creating it.
I will be adding a lot of useful future references to their IMDB profiles however, just in case someone does decide to create a Wikipedia article for Paul, and/or the entire Murphy/Lawrence filmmaking family. Danstarr69 (talk) 11:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murphy and Lawrence Filmmaking Families
Talk:Schwarzian derivative

message: Needs TeXpert help with formulae.
Charles Matthews 11:28, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks fine :) Dysprosia 11:35, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: I am quite interested in knowing if there are any theorems / results concerning positive real roots of the Schwarzian derivative. There are many results where negative roots are concerned, but the particular functions I am studying all have positive roots. Anyone have any info?
[John McKay] Why can this not be referred to as Schwarz derivative ? It makes the search 
more consistent - and is used too. [John McKay]74.57.27.5 16:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roots of the Schwarzian Derivative 

message: In the article on cross-ratio, it says: "The theory takes on a differential calculus aspect as the four points are brought into proximity. This leads to the theory of the Schwarzian derivative, and more generally of projective connections." Following the link, one might expect to see the cross-ratio mentioned in this article, but the phrase doesn't appear. Perhaps someone could craft a sentence or two to clarify the remark made in the other article. Ishboyfay (talk) 20:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection with cross-ratios
Talk:Trinity College Dublin

message: I have previously raised this point, to no avail. The university was founded in 1592. It's present architecture dates from the mid 1700's. Do any architectural renderings of the university from its foundation to the 18c "rebuild" survive? We're talking some 150 years. The previous structure deserves attention. Hanoi Road (talk) 01:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a few webpages at archiseek.com, some of which seem old enough for your needs, such as this one. ww2censor (talk) 11:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thanks. I've seen this before, and it's the only one I could ever track down. It seems strange that (apparently) no other drawing was produced. No image of quad, etc. I haven't even been able to ascertain whether the location was the same (top of Dame St/Westmoreland St). As said, we're talking about  one and a half centuries here. That's quite a black hole.  Hanoi Road (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Further digging in that site reveals that the Rubrics are the sole remaining structure of what was originally an entire quadrangle. So that's it. The whole thing was a redbrick quad. Not sure if you'd like to put that in somewhere. Hanoi Road (talk) 18:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture 1592-1700's 

message: This article refers to Oxford and Cambridge, 15 and 17 times, respectively, including repeatedly in the introduction. I don't believe the links between the universities are particularly critical (as evidenced by the fact that both the Oxford and Cambridge articles mention Dublin only once). I would recommend reducing the prominence and number of references. Bartberrebart (talk) 14:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they're fairly critical. Take a look at "Steamboat Ladies", which gives just one example of the long-standing connection. Trinity was modelled on Oxbridge, and the academic interchange alone (Ernest Walton or Oscar Wilde for example) are very important. I've taken another look at it, and the references seem in all cases quite useful. 86.160.21.41 (talk) 20:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxbridge references 

message: Removed. I suggest that citations are requested where needed, or that specific issues be raised on the talk page. This is a blanket criticism without specifics which cannot be addressed without detail. 86.179.205.163 (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic Boosterism
Talk:Dasa sahitya

message: many letters are in dirgha
would it be btter if we deal with hrasvas?
eg: svAmi instead of swAmI
Also line numbers and clear indication of end of line and end of stanza would be useful.
Some corrections: 
* druDha should be dRDha (the R in rushi)
* karuNa kavacavenna haraNake toDiso
Heavy chariot 12:01, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Pitike 
vishya nirupane
Upasamhara 202.12.82.227 (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dasa sahitya mathu Kanaka dasa prabhanda Kannada  

message: 202.12.82.227 (talk) 17:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dasa sahitya mathu Kanaka dasa prabhanda Kannada  

message: 202.12.82.227 (talk) 17:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dasa sahitya mathu Kanaka dasa prabhanda Kannada
Talk:Royal Exhibition Building

message: The fact` is that the article by Arnold Zable's article represents a major part of the history of one of Melbourne's historic sites of significance.  If you took the time to read the full context of the supplementary post (Which has now been removed from the Wikipedia site),  You would have noticed that it details historical events related to the public campaign to try and prevent tht development of Melbourne's Museum o this site. The content presented the minutes of a public forum that was held in the Royal Exhibition Buildings.  The content opf the minutes was and as relevant to Melbourne's history and in particular the Royal Exhibition Buildings,  I want the link restored.  It was as a result of this campaign that the Royal Exhibition Buildings along with the Carlton Gardens was eventually nominated for World Heritage.   You may wish to rewrite history or prevent this story from being told but ask your self are you acting in the in the public's interest by seeking to prevent this information ad historical facts from being known..  NO,. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Melbcity (talk • contribs) 
: The above relates to The Dome - Melbourne's Royal Exhibition Building which is an extended version of the Zable article (below) and which I have now submitted to AfD. -- RHaworth 09:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fork

message: This article is very interesting, but it's not suitable to appear verbatim in Wikipedia.  Maybe in Wikisource? --Robert Merkel 22:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Zable article and commentary 

message: The article does not mention the REB was the place the Australian flag was flown for the first time.
58.170.7.61 05:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian flag 
Talk:Rachel's Tears

message: Article was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 16 to Apr 21 2004, consensus was to redirect to Rachel Scott.  Discussion:
*Merge with Rachel Joy Scott and delete.  Probably a copyvio, and definitely POV.  RickK 04:26, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: i've rewritten and unredirected. it has a cover photo for infobox, and two academic chapters about the book in relation to columbine.  Slowking4: 7@1|x 18:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: no merge; notable in itself. Wikipedia:Notability (books): "The book has been the subject[1] of multiple, non-trivial[2] published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself.[3] This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary. "  Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 15:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewritten
Talk:Axel Julius De la Gardie

message: Blef 1657 öfverste vid östgöta infanteri, öfverste för Västgöta ryttare, 1684 generalmajor vid kavalleriet och öfverste för Lifgardet, 1668 generallöjnant och slutligen riksråd. Han fick, da man befarade krig med Ryssland, befallning att taga befal öfver trupperna i Finland och Ingermanland och vidtaga nödiga försvars- åtgärder. Vid den landtdag, som han 1676 höll i Åbo, beviljades regeringens begäran om nya krigsgärder, och De la G. tillsåg sedermera, att ständernas beslut verkställdes. 1677 öfvertog han försvarsverket vid Kopparberget och blef 1680 medlem af reduktionskommisionen. 16871704 tjänstgjorde De la G. som generalguvernör i Estland, men afskedades på grund af bristande drift i ämbetets förvaltning, hvarefter han åter intog sin plats i rådet.
::I assume the text is from Nordisk Familjebok, so there's not even any reason to keep it here...OlofE 12:36, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original text, archaic Swedish
Talk:Geoffroy's tamarin

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Geoffroy's tamarin (Saguinus geoffroyi) 2.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for July 30, 2023. A preview of the POTD can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-07-30. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Aviafanboi (talk) 14:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Octiron

message: Says that it's unaffected by anything except magic. Which is correct, but also wrong. In Sourcery, Terry explains that 'no forge on ths Disc could heat it up'. And yet in Witches Abroad, Granny Weatherwax says, when she's locked in a cell with an octiron lock, 'It's octiron, so I can't magic it open.' Of course, in The Colour of Magic, Terry mentions something called denatured octiron, which is used for magical shielding. -Litefantastic 12:55, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Snatch

message: Comments below apply to the old page about Snatch (movie).  I replaced this page with a disambig page because both there were two pages about the movie.  cbm 08:37, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it worth adding the notion of 'snatches' when it comes to torrents, etc.?  It's a pretty big culture and even if it doesn't warrant its own page maybe a sentence here with a link to .torrent? 141.161.69.62 (talk) 19:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It still hasn't been added or was removed in the meantime. Too bad, since I was here to find what it means. Too bad, also, that the article you linked doesn't explain it. --Kazu89 ノート 15:58, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Torrents