Talk:Gospel of the Nazarenes

message: The first two chapters of Matthew, however, were not included as the Jewish Christians stressed Jesus' humanity and refused his miraculous birth.
 
I can't find anything to back this up. Ehrman in Lost Christianities states it is "possibly lacking the first two chapters" (p. xi) so I don't think he would have gone ahead and turned this possibility into an absolute, and then claim it is a corruption. (Albeit, he does act in a similar nature in The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture). --Ari89 (talk) 05:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ehrman is rather confusing on this topic. One book he asserts the two chapters missing are intentional, in another he claims it was a possibility that these chapters were missing. In one book he asserts 2nd Century authorship, then he claims the possibility of first century authorship in the more recent book - and talking to him a week ago he stated "For the record, I do not date any of the Gnostic Gospels to the first century". Confusing. --Ari89 (talk) 06:08, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspect References 

message: I understand you are clearly an enthusiast (understatement) for the minority view, but you cannot go around deleting anything which gives mainstream scholarship a mention. as here. Either explain your deletions or restore them. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No explanation has been forthcoming, and the same practice of deletions, and pushing of fringe ideas is apparent on the 3 related pages Talk:Gospel of the Hebrews, Talk:Gospel of the Ebionites, Talk:Jewish-Christian Gospels. Clearly any attempt to remove OR and NPOV from this page will be blocked by RetProf for the time being.In ictu oculi (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is important to calm down. I am not deleting your hard work, but merely reverting it temporarily until we reach consensus. Although I disagree that your sources are the "standard" or more "mainline" than Parker etc. they will be fully represented in the article. Good humor and not taking ourselves to seriously would be good. Also it is important that we stop calling each other names. Cheers - Ret.Prof (talk) 20:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The above is a cut and paste from a comment on Talk:Gospel of the Ebionites... go there to see context and response.In ictu oculi (talk) 20:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ret Prof deletions

message: I see the  redirect but who said that? The fragments of the Gospel of the Nazarenes are not 96 like in the Holy Twelve! for example there isn't any history of cat!
--Fontema (talk) 08:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy twelve 

message: I'm going to copy/paste some content here from what is now a stub of the Hebrew (Aramaic) Gospel article that might be added later.  Given the primitive state of this article, it might be a long wait. Ignocrates (talk) 19:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content to possibly merge from Hebrew (Aramaic) Gospel 

message: Particularly since Christ Jesus is called The Nazarene, and since the passage in "The Book of Numbers", Chapter Six,Holy Bible Torah is called "The Nazarite Code", it would be a scholarly mistake to leave out comment, or at least reference to this still adhered to guide for holiness. It is said that the Hebrew word used in this section to be 'separate' means 'wonderful', in Greek is 'pala'. Young's Concordance.. In  The New Testament, 2 Corinthians 6:17instructs to "come out and be separate". These are softly spoken clues as to the way to live.
Azeleas2grow (talk) 14:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Nazarene(/Nazirite) Code in The Book of Numbers Chapter Six , an obvious clue for how to live. 

message: "Its sole literary witnesses are brief citations found in patristic literature and quotations by the Church Fathers.[11]"
Can someone elucidate for me the difference between "patristic" and "Church fathers"? Or between citations and quotations?  The last time i tried to proof/edit some pleonastic writing the éminences grises of Wikidom slapped me down and destroyed an hour's worth of re-writing... but could the author(s) of these lovely erudite articles please submit to some Simplify! Simplify! Simplify!
Thanks.
     ~ d. pablo stanfield h., Seattle WA     2020: 09/13  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:9200:B330:F481:3204:CA5F:B411 (talk) 06:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language that means something