lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Donald Robb

message: Is this person in any way notable?  The article does not assert any notability at present.--Michig 19:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A simple Google search would have shown you that he was. We are all able to work together to edit and expand articles, and in some cases an editor will begin a page, with the understanding that other editors with interest and expertise will add to it over time. Badagnani 20:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just wondering, because there didn't seem to be a good reason to have a disambiguation page at John Robb.  The dab page still seems unnnecessary since only one is known simply as John Robb.  If you're adding an article it's up to you to make sure that notability is clear, not other editors.--Michig 20:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

text: First of all, welcome to Wikipedia. It can be a bewildering place at first, but asking questions is the best way to get answers. You should notice that the discussions above are dated to nearly seven years ago, and a lot can happen in so long a time. There is an article explaining what "notability" entails here. I doubt that there is any longer a serious issue over notability for John Donald Robb, but you should read the notability article anyway, because it will help you to understand one of the more important issues when it comes to writing biographical articles (or articles on any topic, for that matter). Disambiguation is a somewhat more mechanical matter, and is explained at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. A disambiguation page" is used to redirect the reader to several different articles that have a common name, such as biography articles for different people named John Smith. The discussion from 2007, above, concerns the question of whether anyone would likely search for John Donald Robb without using his middle name, in which case there are several John Robbs from which to choose (and even another John D. Robb). This appears to have been dealt with long since. The current situation (which prompted addition of a banner a day or two ago) has to do with neutrality and a possible conflict of interest, since the fairly large number of edits made (I assume these are the ones you did) appeared to come from someone closely associated with the subject of an article. While this is not necessarily a fatal problem, in order to avoid the appearance of self-interested parties being responsible for most of the article content, it is important that editors not associated with the subject supply enough of the information, and that a sufficient number of independent, third-party sources be cited, to establish that the subject is actually notable. This is one reason why I restored the two citations that were deleted. Up to now, I suppose I have been the primary contributing editor to this article, which should help ameliorate the appearance of conflict-of-interest, since I have absolutely no connection at all with J. D. Robb, and only came upon this article by chance, when following up a connection from another composer article.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 17:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Margaritaville at Sea Islander

message: I have taken the liberty of adding a list/table of the deck names and what is found on each that is not one full of passenger cabins. I was recently on this very boat on a cruise through the Mediterranean. If a list of the deck names is not allowed, you have my permission to delete it. Just let me know beforehand.--Imnotyouok (talk) 04:49, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for going to that trouble.  Of course, we don't need your permission to delete it, though.  Remember to be bold. Llamabr (talk) 17:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deck names

message: Atlantica and Mediterranea are laid up in Cyprus now instead of Dubai. Imperial27 (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laid up in Cyrus
Talk:Hiromi Hayakawa

message: How can I contact her to be my girlfriend? El Chompiras 17:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contact info 

message: If she's a Mexican national (she is, isn't she?), she's most likely not a Japanese national as well, as Japan discourages, if not outright forbid, double nationality. So most probably she doesn't belong in the category "Japanese people of Mexican descent". SamEV (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese of Mexican descent? 

message: This is written under Death- "Hayakawa died on September 27, 2017, because Hearth Attack. She was 34 and expecting a baby by October 21, 2017. The baby was growing very fast so she may born 10 days before. On September 26 she was rushed to the hospital because a pain in the stomach. The unborn child named Julieta died around 11pm. The doctors tried to control the internal bleeding but finally died after the 4 hearth attack. On September 28 She and Julieta will be incinerated and the ashes will remain in Mexico City with Fernando, the husband.[3]"
This is awful grammar. I'm going to clean it up. 76.123.200.158 (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?
Talk:Margaritaville at Sea Paradise

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.cruisejunkie.com/collide.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  -- saberwyn 22:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:John Gerrard Keulemans

message: The link which I attached to the page for John Gerrard Keulemans is not a blog.  The link has been removed on the basis that it was a blog.  This is a webpage which was created as an online gallery, titled "John Gerrard Keulemans:  Illustrations," of the works of Keulemans, and the link was established July 12, 2007.  The project has been used and endorsed by the Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian) and by Linda Hall Library (University of Missouri--Kansas City).  In July of this year I simply amended the link information as it was changed so that readers could again have access to it, but this action was recently reverted (View History).  I am appealing the decision to remove the link on the pretense that it was a blog.  Please contact mmslouis for more information about the Keulemans gallery. db-user  db-user (talk) 16:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of link
Talk:Goddess Of The Night

message: Would this be a "Fortuna-class" ship? 68.32.48.221 (talk) 05:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

message: These reports - https://www.deseret.com/u-s-world/2020/3/26/21196192/coronavirus-covid-19-cost-cruises-magica-favolosa-miami and https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/cruises/2020/03/26/coronavirus-costa-magica-costa-favolosa-miami-sick-crew/2914625001/ indicate only crew left. What happened to the passengers ? -- Beardo (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coronavirus 

message: https://www.tradewindsnews.com/cruise-and-ferry/carnival-corp-sells-costa-brand-cruise-ship-to-greece-s-seajets/2-1-1401260 2601:240:D780:580:4493:9FE0:F651:EA0C (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Any change of article title should only be considered if and when she restarts cruise operations. Davidships (talk) 00:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship sold
Talk:Andrea Chénier

message: We need to redo the this page.  Beniamino Gigli was the role's most important interpreter, along with many others who are not listed in this "bush league" description.
----
Also needed is Soprano's who have sung Maddelena including Maria Callas and plot. Also Act III and IV takes place during The reign of terror.
---- 
Usually, the discography is included in the article about the opera itself.
Therefore I do not understand the existence of Andrea Chénier discography.
Dirk van Duijvenbode (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

message: How should we be glossing this in the summary? I'm really averse to glossing merveilleuse as prostitute and incroyable as spy, because that's factually untrue (see Incroyables and Merveilleuses), but on the other hand, those styles are anachronistic in this opera anyway. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that a merveilleuse is not a prostitute.  I took out the parenthetic and linked to the "Incroyables and Merveilleuses" article.  Curious readers should be able to follow up on the topic there.  It's true that both are anachronistic in the opera, but I don't think that needs to be mentioned in the plot synopsis.  If one were to discuss every anachronism, it could fill a whole new section. Iglew (talk) 01:51, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incroyables and Merveilleuses 
Talk:Costa Serena

message: Would you notice that "Costa Serena" is also the name of a touristic region of Corsica, namely the middle part of the eastern coast of Corsica, around fr:Ghisonaccia. Thanks. (I am fr:User:Fr.Latreille) --77.196.140.212 (talk) 20:50, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A "Costa Serena" in Corsica
Talk:John Henry Wigmore

message: The information about clawback agreements and inadvertent disclosures does not appear relevant.  The Federal Rules of Evidence contain many rules; choosing to focus on only inadvertent disclosures of privileged material appears random unless a specific connection to Wigmore is explained.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.65.201.52 (talk) 03:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Hugh Gillis

message: Hi all, I have just had a look at this article, and have done my best to divide it up into sections. My effort has been cursory and I feel that the article could contain further sub-heading; however, it needs a relentless copy edit to correct the grammar, punctuation, spelling, layout of information, relevancy of information, incorrect citations etc etc etc. I suspect that this will be quite a large job for a volunteer. I may come back to work on this article over time; however, as I am unfamiliar with the subject, it may be a task better suited to someone who is passionate and knowledgeable about the topic.Jihadcola (talk) 19:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up this article
Talk:Pes anserinus (leg)

message: A good mnemonic to remember the muscles which contribute tendons to this conjoint tendon and the innervations of these muscles is SGT FOS (sergent FOS)
S- sartorius
G- gracilius
T- semitendinosus
F- femoral nerve
O- obturator nerve
S- sciatic nerve
:The one we got taught is "Say Grace before Tea" (Sartorius, Gracilius and SemiTendinosus). But youre one is good as it has a good way of remembering the nerve innervation as well. calaka 11:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

message: the illustration (which looks very old0 is a posterior view of the knee and does not show the 'pes' at all. what is needed is a medial view.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.59.229 (talk) 06:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  poor illustration 

message: We appear to have two articles on the same topic. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:36, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and no. From what I can tell guy ropes are the three muscles and pes anserinus is the insertion point/tendons. At this moment I have no stance on a possible merger but will give it some thought. Kind regards JakobSteenberg (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Guy ropes]]
Talk:John Labatt

message: The date of his graduation from high school must be wrong - would make him 58  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.139.152.185 (talk) 12:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Graduation
Talk:John Langalibalele Dube

message: I know from visiting the area often and having discussions with the historical archivist of the Inanda Seminary, Rev Couper, that John Dube had nothing to do with the founding of this school. This is an important and fundamental error.
He founded the Ohlange Institute which is today a mixed school. 
I dont claim to be a historian but this is a noteworthy mistake.
41.244.91.46 (talk) 18:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's noteworthy that his wife Nokutela Dube is not mentioned here. This article implies that she may well deserve her own article.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:42, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a stub article here: Nokutela Dube -- The Anome (talk) 10:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - I've expanded it a little.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Nokutela Dube

message: NO mention in his infobox of WHERE he died, or when he married Hugo999 (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing basic facts?
Talk:John Lloyd Wright

message: There's already a photo … so I've removed , as it is obviously not needed. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 04:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for photo?
Talk:John Magee (missionary)

message: "Disposition of the Nanking Masscre film
In 1963 Magee left the 16mm camera and the film to his son David who had accompanied him in Nanking."
i'm assuming it's supposed to be 1953 since he died that year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.175.162 (talk) 14:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1963? 

message: This article contains a line (without citation) stating that the video does not currently exist. Yet, I have found reference to it in the Library of Congress and on YouTube. What is the true state of this video?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C539:1410:C062:9D1A:EED0:D49E (talk) 15:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that, too. I know we are supposed to assume good faith, but it does strike me as having a subtle ring of massacre denial in it.--172.129.31.65 (talk) 03:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No copies exist? 
Talk:John Mosley Turner

message: does anyone have a picture of John Mosely Turner to down load. unable to find a picture anywhere. (PershingBoy)209.247.22.75 (talk) 03:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have one, but it's from a newspaper so can't be used here. SiameseTurtle (talk) 08:29, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture
Talk:Kids on Fire School of Ministry

message: Kids On Fire is actually a really creepy name when you think about it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.110.5.16 (talk) 22:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A Thought

message: They steal kids from reality at a young age.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.232.196.34 (talk) 19:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Creepy
Talk:John Neale Dalton

message: Here is a photo of a young Rev. Dalton, circa 1873. I'm not sure if it's protected or not, so not posting on the page itself (sorry, didn't have time to investigate):
https://www.rct.uk/collection/search#/52/collection/2369474/john-neale-dalton-1839-1931nbsp
Tiredmeliorist (talk) 23:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo from Royal Collection Trust
Talk:Disney Wonder

message: The Article States that the Captain of the Disney Wonder is Henry Andersson. This is not true, as he is now the captain of the new Disney Dream. I do not know who the current captain of the Disney Wonder is. Airplanegod (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 23:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain? 

message: There is no mention of this in the article? Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm ... good question. Looks like we may need to start up Incidents on Disney Cruise Line at some point, although I would not necessarily have a problem with this being listed here for the time being.  --McDoobAU93 15:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually think that Ms. Coriam's disappearance would make an ideal stand-alone article if more sources could be found, per our other "Disappearance of ..." articles. I'm sure there's other coverage. And a list, perhaps, not just of Disney incidents but of all the many instances of passengers and staff who have disappeared from cruise ships, would be a good idea, too. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is a good idea as well, and probably more appropriate since incidents like this are generally rare, but do seem to be happening more (if only because there are more cruise lines and more cruisers, so to speak).  --McDoobAU93 20:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

text: It is undue weight to have an incidents section in the article. IT is a historical event thus should be cover there. Spshu (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappearance of Rebecca Coriam?
Talk:M58 Wolf

message: The M58 Wolf is an actual vehicle system utilized by the United States Army for obscuring large areas. It is an actual weapons system, and therefore, this article is relevant.
--Meltonkt 22:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for adding some information for context. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for your help with this. I'm new to editing Wikipedia, but an avid user. --Meltonkt 00:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Suggest changing "artilary" to "artillery". Dy4u7tH9K8 (talk) 23:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor spelling 

message: since M58 would predate M59 (APC) anybody know for sure why or whats up with that. if its a SYSTEM number whats an M57 system, or an M59 system?  Brian in denver (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: M-numbers
Talk:John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey

message: Corrected this statement:
Also he was the judge in Woolmington v. DPP.
To this, which is more grammatically correct, and true:
Viscount Sankey's judgment in Woolmington v DPP is famous for iterating the duty inherent on the Prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In pertinent part, his judgment stated:
Throughout the web of the English criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen - that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt subject to what I have already said as to the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception...
This judgment is usually referred to as the 'golden thread'.
While he was indeed a judge in Woolmington v DPP, he wasn't the only one. In this particular case before the House of Lords, there was 5. LudBob 05:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup work

message: Political party in the info box states Labour, but he would have been expelled from Labour on joining the National Government. I would presume he was in National Labour after 1931, but not sure what he was in later life. Dunarc (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political party 

message: totally inaccurate 212.129.87.170 (talk) 23:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms
Talk:Neath and Brecon Railway

message: This article is a randomly selected subject of my attempt to guage the evolving quality of Wikipedia. I will occasionally select 10 article at random (using the "Random article" feature, of course) and grade each of them using the Wikipedia:Good Article standard below:
What is a good article?
A good article has the following attributes.
1. It is well written. 
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. 
3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FAC, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.
4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
5. It is stable, i.e.,  it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars.
6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. 
===May 21, 2008===
# Neath and Brecon Railway
#*Well written? - Yes.
#*Factually accurate? - Well- sourced.
#*Broad in its coverage? - Yes for subject matter.
#*NPOV - Yes.
#*Is it stable? - FAILED. Too many major recent edits.
#*Images - Yes. Outstanding - but page format is odd.
- Davodd (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Random evaluation

message: # Neath and Brecon Railway
#*Well written? - Yes.
#*Factually accurate? - Well- sourced.
#*Broad in its coverage? - Yes for subject matter.
#*NPOV - Yes.
#*Is it stable? - FAILED. Too many major recent edits.
#*Images - Yes. Outstanding - but page format is odd.
- Davodd (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[May 21]], 2008

message: I am almost certain that in the years immediately prior to closure in 1962, the only daily return journey was on a Saturday.  Mons to Fris t/t consisted of a single train in one direction only (I think northbound) with presumably a balancing empty stock working in the reverse direction.  None of the formal publications on the N&B mention this.  Is any editor in a position to confirm / deny this info???  Flying Stag (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timetables pre-closure
Talk:MS Holiday

message: In the photo, there is a much, much larger ship behind the MS Holiday. Anybody know what it is? --75.170.41.9 (talk) 03:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's definately one of Royal Caribbean's Voyager class ships. Based on the shape of the balconies I'd say it's either  or . — Kjet (talk · contribs) 12:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Background ship?

message: Does it need an entry   put at the end?  (I have put one in and then commented it out as it just shows a missing template message.)
And does this talk page need the  line removed from the start?
SandJ-on-WP (talk) 17:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cruise and Maritime Voyages template needed? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 14:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: MS Magellan →  – Vessel has been scrapped, so the page should be moved to her original name Angelgreat (talk) 23:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Moved your Technical Request comments into the discussion. -2pou (talk) 17:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Angelgreat (talk) 23:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 May 2021
Talk:John Fortescue (historian)

message: I'm pretty certain that describing Winifred as from Barlavington is wrong.  Her marriage certificate (http://www.perfumefromprovence.com/marriagecertificate.htm) shows her address as Great Bealings.  Her autobiog says that while she was engaged to John she lived either in London or Bealings; the wikipedia entry for Great Bealings shows her father was still rector until 1917, after the marriage.  I've changed that entry. --Phil Holmes (talk) 11:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winifred Beech's address 