lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Janus Capital Group

message: The sections on INTECH, Perkins, and Gary Black were pulled right off the profile page and have been removed.  --BrokenSphereMsg me 17:21, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections pulled 

message: I've placed a notability tag on the article. While I think it's quite plausible that Janus Capital Group could be established as notable, the references in the current article fail to do so. Routine business announcements (such as rounds of funding, mergers/acquisitions, or appointments of officers) are not the sort of in-depth coverage that's needed to establish notability. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 04:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:JanSport

message: *
*https://web.archive.org/web/20180207171632/http://www.outdoorinov8.com/ 
*https://web.archive.org/web/20141008221022/http://www.inov8.au.com/compass/ 
*https://web.archive.org/web/20120502091817/http://homepage.mac.com/inov8/Compass/
*The History of American Backpacking Gear Pioneers 1935 to the Present at oregonphotos.com
:.... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 20:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdoor Gear history
Talk:Janousek Racing Boats

message: Shouldn't this be 'Janousek Racing Boats'? The company name is Janousek Racing Boats Ltd.
Bob Janousek may deserve a wiki in his own right, creating a possible ambiguity (and a DAB page). Thoughts, anyone? TrulyBlue (talk) 18:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Title
Talk:Moving panorama

message: Peter, thanks for your thoughts here.  Now that you mention it, an argument could be made to merge all these into "Panoramic painting" -- though I know from experience over the years that not all enthusiasts of the large, fixed "great circle" panoramas are even willing to consider "Moving Panoramas" as panoramas at all!  The Myriorama entry poses the additional difficulty that this word was used for two quite different things.
I would propose, at any rate, that the section on the Poole Brothers' "myrioramas" be moved into "Moving Panorama," since that's what they really were -- but that the item on Myriorama cards be kept intact; we'd then need a disambiguation page (how does one do that?) to parse out the two.  What do you and others think of that?
Rapotter 15:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging the myriad 

message: Thanks for the detailed advice -- I have followed it and hope that it's worked; if you could look in on the moved and merged text and make any adjustments you think needed, I'd be grateful!
Rapotter 19:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move and merge -- mostly done 
Talk:Jagjaguwar

message: In the Godzilla series, it's Jet Jaguar, not Jagjaguwar. I'm gonna remove that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.7.167 (talk) 05:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm very familiar with Secretly Group and Jagjaguwar. I plan to update some information here since I've noticed inconsistencies between this and information that has been published or can easily be found on the company websites. Plus they've grown a lot, so generally it looks like most of this info is outdated. 
I will do my best to be as objective as I possibly can be and I will cite everything! If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. I'm happy to discuss anything that I may have cited incorrectly or generally seems incorrect. 
Appreciate all feedback. Thanks! --SecretlyRAG (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclosing COI
Talk:Jaeger (clothing)

message: I've 'refurbished' this article to improve the structure and say more about its history. I've increased its class from stub to C and changed its importance scale from low to mid on fashion – Jaeger is certainly notable for its textiles (innovative woollens and first camel hair coat) and for being a launch pad for Jean Muir. I think this is a better reflection of the brand's importance and long heritage. Will continue updating as it has a new management team (as of 2013) and is returning to UK production as of 2014. Banners have come off to reflect resolution of the outdated info problem. Other issues seemed to be lack of sources and muddled structure with long gaps in company history. Libby norman (talk) 15:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements to this article
Talk:Jadrolinija

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20071108205841/http://www.jadrolinija.hr/default.aspx?dpid=1394. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Jacob (clothing retailer)

message: I found that  had added on  02:47, 6 May 2008 under "Menswear" 
: Mi tio Eduardo se trajo ropa de hombre espectaculas ya hace unos anios y no la puedo encontrar mas en Montreal.
and  was relieved to find that "trajo ropa de hombre espectaculas" doesn't refer to "carrying" a spectacular, uh, "male rope" but to wearing fancy threads, per Babel Fish:
: My uncle Eduardo was engaged in man clothes espectaculas already makes anios and I cannot find it but in Montreal.
It's off-topic, and i'm removing it to here to clarify that there's presumably no point in trying to get an encyclopedic translation. --Jerzy•t 00:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed material 

message: jacob boutiques are closing down, stores will be open for liquidation sales  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.203.108.54 (talk) 20:21, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing down
Talk:Jacksonville Expressway Authority

message: I'm removing the bit about exit numbers, as these were probably a misinterpretation by USGS of inset numbers from the official JEA map:
#Heckscher Drive (I-95)
#Lem Turner Road (I-95)
#20th Street (I-95)
#Downtown (I-95)
#Riverside (I-95)
#Gator Bowl (SR 115)
#University Boulevard (SR 115)
#Beach Boulevard (SR 115)
#South Jacksonville (I-95)
#South Jacksonville (I-95)
#Atlantic Boulevard (SR 228)
#Beach Boulevard at Highland Avenue (SR 228A)
#University Boulevard South (SR 228)
#Beach Boulevard at Parental Home Road (SR 228)
--NE2 19:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit numbers
Talk:Barbour (company)

message: Removed, as I'm not entirely sure what it's trying to say: Although for decades made in the U.K., most of Barbour's products are not made outside the U.K. Bob talk 09:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence 

message: My recently purchased Barbour wax-cotton coat is marked "Made in Lithuania", this would contradict the claim that their wax cotton coats are Made in the UK.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.36.68 (talk) 04:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Information
Talk:Sunshine Sammy Morrison

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved - This discussion had limited participation and there doesn't appear to be a consensus to move the page. I have no objections if anyone re-proposes this to Sammy Morrison.  Interstellarity (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Ernie Morrison →  – per WP:COMMONNAME. Subject was not known to the public as "Ernie Morrison" and his most-frequent on-screen credited name was Sunshine Sammy Morrison. Occasionally, the credit was Sammy Morrison or simply Sunshine Sammy, but never Ernie Morrison. The main header of his American Film Institute entry or his Turner Classic Movies entry is Sunshine Sammy Morrison. Here is a link to the film Spooks Run Wild which lists his stage name acting credit as "Sunshine Sammy Morrison". If consensus skews towards moving his entry's main title header to the full form, with the stage name in quotes — Ernest "Sunshine Sammy" Morrison — I would also support it. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 04:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 March 2020
Talk:Ivo Lola Ribar Institute

message: Is this institute gone? LOLA institut says it has existed since 1985, forked from a company called Ivo Lola Ribar, so I'm not sure if this article describes its predecessor or something. It would be good if someone clarified this. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  old?
Talk:AT&T Mexico

message: Iusacell's network is no longer the only 3G-enabled mobile network in the country. Telcel has launced a UMTS network, so that argument is no longer valid, even if the UMTS network is not yet fully deployed. 189.180.66.54 (talk) 05:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 3G network

message: Paragraph The merger will allow for important synergies and economies of scale, as well as higher operating efficiency, broader data transmission network coverage and the elimination of duplicate expenses. This will strengthen the company’s position within the industry, which translates into a more robust competition in the wireless telephony market. As a result, more service options are generated and more competitive prices, benefiting millions of users in Mexico and the whole performance of the economy., is pure PR, and the claim of benefiting... the whole performance of the economy is pure fantasy. Therefore this paragraph was deleted from the article. More edits on the way.
N. Macchiavelli 15:45, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted paragraph 

message: what about the iden to LTE rebanding on 800?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.184.115.152 (talk) 07:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iden shutdown?
Talk:Italeri

message: I've copy-edited the page somewhat to remove some of the more promotional statements and improve the readability, as well as adding the company logo and citing the company's 'about' page. Thing is, the Italian version of the company's page is more extensive than the English version, and I can't find any other sources about the company after a quick search. They are a fairly major model kit company, so they are notable. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 23:03, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Italdesign Giugiaro

message: The Bugatti Veyron, unlike the prior contemporary concept cars for Bugatti under VW ownership, is not a Giugiaro design. Rdeiriar (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Itala (company)

message: Why Itala is it? I suggest to change the title in Itala, cars.--87.6.105.51 (talk) 10:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 
Talk:ITA Software

message: Man this thing is so outdated. Carl De Marken doesn't work here anymore, and the number of customers and products has since proliferated. And no, I'm not updating it. There are better people for the job. --Disgruntled_yet_very_satisfied_employee  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.107.91.99 (talk) 19:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently this article needs updating, but an editor who knows the business is needed. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated?

message: Does anyone know if Google is allowing ITA to continue using the Common Lisp programming language, or will they insist on porting everything over to one of their 3 or 4 approved languages (e.g., Java)? Biturica (talk) 00:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Common Lisp?
Talk:Death of John Ward

message: Maybe Im wrong, but seems like much of the article was written by someone siding with Tom/John Ward? unsogned by User:Asbad
:Well then edit it to a more neutal tone.--Vintagekits 22:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased?
Talk:EarthClan

message: I proposed for the List of minor Uplift universe characters to be merged onto this page because the only character on it is a major character and member of EarthClan TomDS 22:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the merge templates due to a lack of consensus --Lox (t,c) 18:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: Can anyone come up with any reason why this article would have a reference request?  It's an article about a fictional universe, and it cites the books from the author that detail it.  There are no 'more appropriate' sources! I've gone ahead and removed the request.  71.29.75.132 (talk) 22:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference Request?

message: Recent article from ABC News.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.27.158.210 (talk) 01:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meta: Dolphins *do* dream of whales!
Talk:Ispat International

message: I'd just like to apologize for misconstruing an edit made in good faith as vandalism. However please consider that Wikipedia is not a directory, and please consider the importance of using reliable sources that demonstrate encyclopedic notability. Thanks WilliamH (talk) 13:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: There is missing information about this subject which can be found (with sources) in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usinor&oldid=493406365#Usinor-Sacilor.2C_Usinor.2C_and_merger_into_Arcelor Oranjblud (talk) 22:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Acquisitions
Talk:Island Telecom

message: I do not fully agree with this statement.
902 was assigned in 1947, when the first 86 area codes of the NANP were assigned throughout the 48 states, 9 provinces and DC. At that time, 902 applied to all three Canadian Maritime provinces, and two years later, also covered Newfoundland.  In 1955, New Brunswick and Newfoundland were split to area code 506, a condition that was still in effect in 1960-62 which is the earliest that DDD could have been introduced in Atlantic Canada.  In 1962, Newfoundland was split to area code 709, leaving PEI as the only province still sharing an area code with another, probably due to the impracticality of assigning an entire area code to such a small population.
I would say, then, that the longtime sharing of 902 between two provinces is simply a vestige left from splitting New Brunswick and Newfoundland out of the 902 code in 1955. The fact that MT&T held a controlling ownership in IslandTel served to subordinate IslandTel's numbering assignments under its parent company.
One can only speculate what would happen if 902 neared exhaust. Given current CRTC tendencies on choice of code relief, an overlay seems more likely, in this case, perhaps a concentrated overlay of Nova Scotia only, while leaving PEI a supply of 902 CO codes. However, a split of PEI to a separate code cannot be ruled out.  The most logical area code, however, 734 (PEI spelt out on the dial), is not available for assignment. GBC (talk) 06:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreement to share the 902 area code?
Talk:DuPont Central Research

message: This article is great but I suggest renaming it to something like DuPont Central Research Department, the current title is confusing. Also the category Category:Laboratories would be more suitable. V8rik 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This presentation accurately reflects the early days of Dupont Central Research. I was on that research staff 1959-1967.
Fvhayden (talk) 16:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Accurate Description
Talk:ISCAR Metalworking

message: Gilabrand - Here's what the Times reference says: "The company prides itself on its levels of automation, which enables the plant to be run at night by one person, at home, on their computer."  Saying: "Utilizing modern technology Iscar's factory is controlled by one person sitting at his home computer." isn't faithful to the reference and misleads the reader.  Instead of deleting the sentence out-right I made an attempt to fix it.  Sorry if the sentence is a bit clunky,  perhaps you could find a better way to reword without losing the meaning, or be more specific with what's wrong with the grammar and I'll give it another try.Mirboj (talk) 11:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fine now. Best, --Gilabrand (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Run by one person? 

message: The recently-created article ITA - Iscar Tool Advisor seems like a great candidate for a merge to this article. Any thoughts? VQuakr (talk) 05:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Helen Morrison

message: Removal of Proposed Deletion
As per proposed deletion rules, anyone objecting to a deletion can remove the deletion notice and rules also state it should not be added back in following the removal (just in case people were thinking that).  I am objecting to this deletion because I disagree with the reason stated for deletion, which was related to the article not being noteworthy.  At least from what the article says, I disagree with this point on the basis that this individual has conducted noteworthy psychological study and has published books and academic papers to that effect.  I would content the article is badly written, has no references.  Instead of deletion I would propose that a quality template be put in place.  Asking for the article to be improved and enhancing the content of Wikipedia is preferable to deletion. Freakchild (talk) 00:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Criticism seems to have had a habit of disappearing from this article. I took a shot at writing a reasonably NPOV and sourced section. I should hope it doesn't disappear also. 71.254.6.87 (talk) 20:57, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  24 May 2010 - added criticism
Talk:IOPS

message: At the start of the article there is a lot of discussion of "IOPS" without ever defining it. Perhaps the equation iops * transfer_size = byte_transfer_rate is a definition, but it doesn't show up early enough. Also, it is not elevated to the status of a definition. In addition, I can't find a definition of input/output operation. Input/output has it's own page, but that is very general. It would be useful to have a discussion about how manufacturer's measure IOPS. Grantacameron (talk) 22:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of IOPS 

message: I removed a lot of meaningless manufacturer-sourced claims of drives having "up to" sensational speeds in the SSD table (presumably in some special conditions not experienced in real life use). What this article needs is a neutral tally not promoting manufacturers, like the table for mechanical drives. IvicaInsomniac (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  IOPS for SSD drives
Talk:IonCube

message: I never contribute to wikipedia so this probably isn't very helpful, but I looked at this article and saw a bunch of formatting inconsistencies and almost no citations. I have no idea how to put those little warning things on the top and have no interest in learning how right now, but figured I could at least give someone monitoring the changelog a heads up that this article needs help65.129.116.10 (talk) 08:32, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You would insert  at the top of the article. See Help:Template and Wikipedia:Template_messages for more info. bendodge (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections required
Talk:Iogen Corporation

message: This is good information. More details on how the enzines digest would be helpful. Is sunlight needed? optimum temperature? Can I do this at home? Ccpoodle 15:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Iogen Corp. →  — This page was moved from Iogen Corporation to Iogen Corp. almost five years ago. The given reason was Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies).  However, it is not clear what exactly was meant by this.  The company itself use 'Iogen Corporation'. Beagel (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk page still needs to be moved (waiting for the redirect to be deleted).--Kotniski (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also now  (but not by me). Andrewa (talk) 18:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: * http://www.energy.probeinternational.org/alternative-energy/renewables/white-lightning-ethanol-and-iogen-patrick-foodys-20-year-ethanol-itch-
Early article on Foody and ethanol prospects, but very detailed.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1998 article on Patrick Foody and ethanol 

message: A lot has changed since previous updates. Tried to update for current events, but article needs more rewriting. Here's employee breakdown I deleted, which was relevant for when company was 3x its current size: "with over half involved in research and development, and engineering; one fifth in manufacturing; and the balance in sales, marketing, and administration."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.244.117.93 (talk) 21:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 changes
Talk:Iodophor

message: The homebrewing section states that the solution sublimes from the solution to a gas, but sublimation is when a solid goes to a gas state without becoming liquid first.  It seems like it is really just evaporating.  Thoughts?  Novernae (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sublimation
Talk:Invista

message: The company INVISTA should be in all caps as that is their trademarked name.  Also the brands that their products are sold under should reflect the registration symbol and they are all caps also as that is how the brands are registered.  Source is the INVISTA website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.246.73.66 (talk • contribs) 
:Nope, sorry.  Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks), "When deciding how to format a trademark, editors should choose among styles already in use (not invent new ones) and choose the style that most closely resembles standard English, regardless of the preference of the trademark owner."  SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Invictus Records

message: The most successful Invictus recording was "Band Of Gold" which went to #1 in England and stayed #1 for 6 weeks. The biggest act for Invictus was not "The Chairmen Of The Board," it was "The Honey cone". "The Flaming Embers" had Westbound #9 and Payne had "Bring The Boys Back Home"; thus, Payne probably sold the most as a soloist and Honey Cone sold the most as a group?  Interesting to note: H-D-H first approached Diana Ross to sing "Band Of Gold" but she refused as it was obviously a Supremes' sounding song. Hence, H-D-H approached Frieda Payne who was not too keen to sing it, either. Spenser - The Unknown (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invictus' Most Successful Recording (s)?