lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Four-level approach

message: Ref: "Four-level approach".
I am an occasional user of Wikipedia and find it very helpful.
It seems to me that for this article "Four-level approach" and probably many others in Wikipedia, that a probable date of validity or relevance might be helpful   For example I have no knowledge whether this article is relevant now, over the next year or so, or for ever.  Perhap the Wiki administrators could consider adding a mandatory date field with a selection of drop-down values - such as None, Not predicted, Current <Aug 2007>, Currrent <2007>, Medium term commencing <Aug 2007>, Long term commencing <Aug 2007>, Indefinite commencing <Aug 2007> - or something similar.
No reply expected by me.  Please pass the suggestion on to the Administrator if supported.
Regards, Lezemore 08:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

message: *Support merge with Lamfalussy process as proposed May 2007. Suggest merge from here to there. --Boson 23:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Japanese cruiser Jintsū

message: I believe the image used in the infobox actually showed her sister ship, Naka, due to the flared cruiser bow and the given date of ca. 1924-25. Jintsu didn't have a flared bow until after repairs to damage sustained in a ramming accident in 1927, so it follows that the wrong image was displayed. I've fixed it. ☽Dziban303 »» Talk☾ 04:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox photo
Talk:List of elements by stability of isotopes

message: I was under the impression that some of the elelemnts listed here as stable do in fact exhibit decay.  Bismuth is actually unstable (though for most practical purposes can be considered stable).  
:"Bismuth was found to be hypothetically unstable in 2003, with an α-emission half-life of 1.9 × 1019 years for Bi-209."
The alpha decay of Bi-209 was experimentally measured in 1951 by Compt. Rend. 232, 2093 (1951). NSR ref = 1951FA10. The t1/2 was given as 3e17y. I pulled this from the TOI 4th ed. (1953). It is also mentioned in Asimov's "Inside the Atom" page 110 (1956).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.43.24.150 (talk) 09:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this data up to date?

message: If you're trying to understand the rational of this subject matter I suggest that you take a look at the the various pages of the lanl Map of the Nuclides where the chart is presented in such a manner as to allow a cognitive understanding of relationships of occurence of stable isotopes between the various elements. WFPMWFPM (talk) 18:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rational of subject matter
Category talk:American Trotskyists

message: America is a continent from Tierra del Fuego to Alaska, why are all the people listed here from the USA? Why don't international Trotskyists consider using the term used by Latin Americans when referring to citizens of or people born in the nameless USA: "Estadounidenses." (a word that has no English equivalent but which basically means: “Unitedstatian or UnitedStatesian.” Maybe the category can be changed to “Trotskyists from the United States of America.” Someone free from cultural imperialism or geographic prejudices may erroneously believe that the people on the list are Peruvians or from Bolivia rather than Yanquis! Moshe-paz 08:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: American Trotskyists?
Talk:Cruas Nuclear Power Plant

message: The photo in the infobox looks like the entire nuclear power station is on fire and that the cooling tower is cracking up and about to explode. It could just be the way I have my settings set on my monitor, but it looks very much like that in the infobox (only when you click and see the full size of the image does it's true state become clear) JayKeaton 22:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: lol, oh well, not much we can do about that.  Feel free to switch the pictures around on the page, but since we only have 2 of them, I wouldn't consider deleting either from the article.  I get the feeling though that it would be pretty spectacular to have actually been there. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 00:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  :) So it's not just me that sees the whole plant blowing up then? JayKeaton 02:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor photo choice
Talk:Stony Plain Road

message: Regarding the: September 14 edit. The longest stretch of Stony Plain Road between at-grade intersections is 4.4 km between 231 and 186 St. The speed limits on this segment are 100, 90 and 70 km/h. Does this small segment qualify for "expressway" status? Indefatigable (talk) 19:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expressway
Talk:List of novels set in Crete

message: May I suggest to rename (Move) and format this according to the example of List of books set in New York City, removing also the amazon links? --Tikiwont 08:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, i guess there shoudl be a small 'in' in hte title, but is is it worth it? None of the links is direct and there actually don't seem to exist articles on the novels. --Tikiwont 12:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stephen Grant (comedian)

message: * Did this guy write this himself? The editor's only other contributions seem to be creating links back to this article! Jack1956 08:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the subject has been praised by The Independent and Time Out and other major publications: ; and his TV writing and appearances are listed on IMDB: . There's more out there on him, this is just a quick glance. -- Softlavender (talk) 08:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your speedy input Softlavender. I've removed the Speedy Deletion tag. Are you please able to add a list of his "four live comedy DVDs" and details of "hosts at major comedy clubs in London"? Thanks Lopifalko (talk) 09:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks again for all the fleshing out of this article that you're doing Softlavender. Lopifalko (talk) 10:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome. I could only find two DVDs so I changed the number. Softlavender (talk) 10:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: MySpace isn't a reliable source but I'm posting this here for future reference. It lists some of the shows that Grant wrote or appeared in that aren't (yet) listed in IMDB because IMDB isn't exhaustive. Reliable info probably exists on them somewhere. . By the way, a lot of material previously in this Wiki article was apparently deleted en masse (because it wasn't cited and was pretty over-padded). It's possible some of that could get added back in if deemed relevant and cited. Softlavender (talk) 10:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  For future reference
Talk:Karl Wilhelm Verhoeff

message: The GBIF reference says he commited suicide in 1945, but a contemporary reference states that he died in 1944 after the bomb raids to the city. Since the last bomb raids in Munich were in November 1944 and beginning of 1945, and there were definitedly no more bombing after april 1945, I decided December 1944 was the correct date of his death.--Jrfep (talk) 18:28, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The GBIF reference currently does not mention suicide at all, nor does the paragraph in  The Entomologist's Record. The GBIF piece thus is apparently an unreliable source, and the statement remains unverified. The Mauermayer (1962) reference may support it. --Animalparty-- (talk) 01:21, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

text: The English sources are wrong. The German sources are right. The correct date of death is 06.12.1945. Please, do not change it back to the incorrect 1944. The manner of death is indeed suicide. You may watch this page for updates: https://myriatrix.myspecies.info/users/karl-wilhelm-verhoeff Chilocharlie (talk) 02:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Suicide?
Talk:WWE ECW/Archive 3

message: Can someone please change the logo to the one that is displayed at WWE/ECW.com  The one now that says Extreme Championship Wrestling under it is wrong. That 1 isnt on ECW.com or on ECW on Sci Fi. ----Belevsquad 10:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, did you check http://www.wwe.com/shows/ecw/? That is the same logo, it's just that the picture quality here makes it look a little darker. I would love if someone could find a better quality one though. TJ Spyke 01:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: I think there should definatley be a criticism page --68.45.100.226 00:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Because you don't like it? That's not how it works.«»bd(talk stalk) 00:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: I think we should change the name of this article from Extreme Championship Wrestling (WWE) to WWE Extreme Championship Wrestling. Any thoughts? I just see it better that way as all the WWE brands on Wiki have WWE infront of the brand name. (WWE Raw, WWE SmackDown, WWE Heat). Things like that. ----Belevsquad 05:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When was the first time you've ever heard WWE refer to the ECW brand as WWE ECW? -- bulletproof 3:16 22:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Belve, the reason those other shows have "WWE" in front of their name is because those are the names of the show. It's WWE Friday Night SmackDown! (not Friday Night SmackDown!). TJ Spyke 22:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Belevsquad. it should be called that, because in reality its WWECW. not ECW.--Dr. Pizza 22:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1)That is your opinion, not fact. 2)"WWECW" is a stupid (IMO) meme created by ECW fanboys who are upset that WWE is trying to move forward and not trying to relive the past. I liked the old ECW, but that ECW will never come back. The name of the show doesn't have WWE in it, so calling it that would be factually wrong. TJ Spyke 22:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Page title 

message: we shuld add a champions box to all brands like the 1 with all the champions in the WWE page....please respond thank uNosaints4life 22:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  champion box like the box in the WWE page 

message: the name seems to long extreme championship wrestling (wwe) should be shortened to ECW(wwe) 69.207.162.223 19:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article name is consistent with other Wikipedia articles on wrestling promotions (or brands). In any event, ECW (WWE) already redirects to this article. Jeff Silvers 02:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name
Talk:The Day the World Ended

message: Removed this non-NPOV review:
:"High production values combined with B movie flair work just enough to be passable entertainment for some, but if you enjoy the *wink-wink* of its intended fun, it comes out a winner. It has the look and feel of a decent X-Files episode with the more psychological horror elements of the newer Outer Limits. That's not bad at all, considering."
--Lexor|Talk 10:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone know how to fix the 'Cast'/'External Link' mixup? AMCKen (talk) 01:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout
Template talk:List to table

message: The wording here -- "This list should be changed into a table format to meet Wikipedia's quality standards" -- makes it sound as if a decision has been made by some editorial board and this is an instruction to implement it. In fact, this template is usually a suggestion by the person who added it that the list might be better as a table. Others, indeed the consensus, may disagree. I propose that the wording is adjusted accordingly. 86.134.55.211 (talk) 04:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there have been no comments I have amended the wording. It still gives rather muddled message. Three things are mentioned -- tabularising, improving and pruning -- but in practice it's often not obvious whether the second two are supposed to apply, or whether the person adding it just didn't notice the small print. 86.142.110.189 (talk) 01:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording
Talk:Bugey Nuclear Power Plant

message: The article text says 2 cooling towers, the photo shows 4. How many are actually there? Lklundin (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of cooling towers ? 

message: I don't understand the table with average output and rated power. The rated powers given in the French registry of installations of production and storage of electricity are 880 and 910 MW respectively. David.Monniaux (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear meaning of "average output"
Talk:Rafael Orozco (pianist)

message: Rafael Orozco (which sounds like one word, rafelloROHSko) is the name by which this artist is primarily known in the music world.  An online search frequency comparison illustrates this:
#  ← 3 edits.  Redirect only.     57,800
#  ← 8 edits. Mini-stub.      211
#  ← 31 edits. Stub article.  63
If wikipedia is eliminated from the search, the 57,800 : 211 : 63 ratio becomes approximately 10,000 : 10 : 3.
Both Orozco Flores Rafael and Rafael Orozco Flores should be redirects to Rafael Orozco.
I am submitting move requests to rectify this situation. — Athaenara  ✉  09:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rafael Orozco
Talk:Kubadabad Palace

message: This article is copied almost word for word from the Archnet article provided as a source.  While it is entirely appropriate that the article be cited, listing it as a source when it is in fact the source is dishonest.  Archnet material is copyrighted non-free content, and the article as it stands is unacceptable and requires rewriting. Kafka Liz 13:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: I'm not sure how this information is relevant to an article on the palace. Kafka Liz (talk) 20:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of information on provinces
Talk:Acrise Place

message: I have added an image and Commonscat to the article in response to the reqphoto template above. However we do not yet have up-to-date images of the building, so I have left the template in place. Storye book (talk) 18:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Holbeck Hall Hotel

message: The article has no geographic coordinates for the location. I don't know where the hotel was, but there was a building at approximately  that no longer exists, and one of the roads nearby is called Holbeck Hill. --Snigbrook (talk) 15:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is approximately where the view point is now at the end of Sea Croft Road probably at . Keith D (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: This article is a really short one; I wonder if it should be merged into another article. I don't know which article it should be merged into; but it's just a thought. Please respond on my talk page. ThomasRules (talk) 11:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?
Talk:Rat Trap

message: A song more influenced by a host of other 70s mainstream acts rather than punk? Punk saxophone? What are the recognisable influencess? What is new wave about it? Tsinfandel (talk) 12:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A very good question. Aside from the vocal delivery and the subject matter it's not very punk at all. It's more like a prog-rock concept album rolled into a single song. It's very sophisticated in its construction with seven or eight distinct sections, very far from the rock'n'roll idiom of verse:bridge:chorus. The production standards are high, the musicianship is good. And yet it still manages to be a memorable pop song - they say punk needed progressive rock to react against. It does deserve some deeper analysis.The Yowser (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Continuing the discussion after seven years... even the subject matter isn't necessarily punk. Lyrically it's kind of like about half the songs on Springsteen's "Born to Run" album (which is three years older than this song) rolled into one. One of those songs, "Night", even has the phrase "rat trap" (actually, "rat traps"), where the "rats" are people.  And it has a sax solo. It's the vocal that makes "Rat Trap" punk, or at least punk-ish.  Neutron (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The song "Born to Run" has the saxophone as well. And there's some "Sultans of Swing" (released May 1978) in there as well. Acorrector (talk) 22:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Saxophones and safety pins

message: One of the few songs, if not the only song, to mention Top of the Pops, while appearing on the programme. Can we find a citation for this? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  TotP
Template talk:Campaignbox Italy

message: Bernhardt is covered under the section on the winter line here: Winter Line, Trasimene Line is not a major battle, and there isn't even information about the fighting going on there on the Transmeire page: Trasimene Line. Homersmyid 10:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The campaignbox has a logical progression of the major battles. Trasimene was an important action where Kesselring linked up the 10th and 14th Armies after the Anzio and Cassino defeats - it just hasn't been written yet - Wikipedia is work in progress - fancy a go at it?!. The Winter Line page is not a battle description any more - it just tries to make sense of the confusion over the namings of the various lines so should not be included in the campaignbox. The major "Winter Line" actions were the battles for the Bernhardt Line (article now includes the Adriatic Gustav Line action), Monte Cassino and Anzio. These have been grouped together with subsidiary battles (Ortona, San Pietro and Cisterna) into the subsidiary Winter Line and battle for Rome campaignbox because they are a logical grouping and so as to stop the Italy campaignbox from getting too crowded with relatively minor actions whilst still making them easy to find. Stephen Kirrage talk - contribs 10:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Created new campaignboxes so removed the relevant battles on here to them. Hope this helps. ChrisWet (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Several Battles
Talk:George Pindar School

message: The skate park is closed due to health and safety issues. It is no longer open to the public, and I feel that people should be aware of this (it's an important part of the area!). Please stop reverting my edits.
:Has this been written about in any kind of local newspaper? --allthefoxes (Talk)  21:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skate Park
Talk:Cattenom Nuclear Power Plant

message: Under Events
"There were several incidents involving casualties"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmaltese (talk • contribs) 18:01, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

message: Is adding ranking really a good idea? and if it is, shouldn't a cite or ref be added to link to a specific page?
That information is in the lead section, but it is not mentioned in the article itself, so it is missing the source.
It'll change and seems to already have changed (seeing the current List of nuclear power stations, which puts it on 12th place).
I'll update it with the new ranking, but I don't particularly like the lack of linking. --Prr273 (talk) 09:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking
Talk:International Group

message: The '65 and '85 groups are the two referred to by the two usages of the word "both" in the early part of this article. Are those statements also true of the '62 group, in which case, "both" should become "all three" or simply "they"? BobFromBrockley 10:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The IG that split from the RSL in '61 was the same group who re-entered it in '64 and left finally in '65 so there are only two groups.  I'll re write it to make that clear.Haldraper (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's much better. Thanks! --Duncan (talk) 23:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Both"? 

message: I oppose the proposal to delete. While the two groups are notable only in their relationship to the RSL and IMG, in the 1960s, and to the IMG and Socialist Outlook in the 1980s, it would be laborious to duplicate this content into those four pages, and we would lose the level of detail here. Duncan (talk) 20:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose the proposed deletion
Talk:Paddlesworth

message: Today an internet spoof has been launched based on Paddlesworth a small village in Kent (see Guardian report & fake newspaper. It is likely that this will lead to disruptive edits to the village article & I would welcome the help of others in keeping an eye on it. I think wikipedia should probably have an article on the spoof (once there is enough coverage) but we need to inform readers what is real & what is spoof - I'm not sure of the best way to do this & I would appreciate any help.— Rod talk 10:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed coverage of these fictional events but left in that the spoof exists. I don't think it needs any more than that. Quantpole (talk) 14:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paddlesworth - spoof newspaper etc - help needed 

message: Dode, Kent is described as a neighbouring village - however it is miles away.— Rod talk 10:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The link in that article referred to another Paddlesworth, in Snodland.  The village no longer exists but there is still a church there. Peter E. James (talk) 01:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dode, Kent
Talk:Fraser Coast Region

message: dont know how to edit, (despise seeing the snide "according to whom") in the budget reference,
the annual budget is ~150million
source
http://www.frasercoast.qld.gov.au/documents/4362881/41918424/Budget%20summary%20-%20striking%20the%20balance.pdf
END
124.148.53.195 (talk) 06:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for providing that source. I have updated the article to include the 2015-2016 budget from that document with a citation to that source. It's OK if you dont know how to edit. Just write here what you want done and I am sure someone will help out. Kerry (talk) 22:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  budget
Talk:Pop Girl

message: There's a discussion at Talk:Pop (UK and Ireland)#Removal of unverified information which is relevant to the removal and the replacement of unverified information in this article. Please read that discussion and consider commenting there, before adding any further unreferenced information to this article. Thanks,  —SMALLJIM  12:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of unverified information

message: Naeem 2400:ADC1:12F:500:5063:C004:1723:A032 (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naeem
Talk:Sutton-in-Craven

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Sutton-in-Craven. What you have now, 53°53’ 1°59’, is an empty field ! It should be 53.8924 -1.9932 for that is the village High Street
Kildwyke (talk) 14:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. (You could have fixed this yourself!) -- Dr Greg  talk  15:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: I have suggested that the above article be merged to here due to a lack of notability and general AFD outcomes Atlas-maker (talk) 06:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Sutton-in-Craven CE VC Primary School]]