lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Environmental Working Group

message: The introduction currently concludes with this sentence: "Despite the criticism, EWG and its reports are influential among the public and companies have partnered with them to certify some of their products." The problem that I see with this are:
* The source used is now five years old, and thus a bit dated for making current statements. As such, "are influential" should be changed to "have been influential" to avoid making a current claim.
* "among the public and companies have..." is just awkward phrasing. Best to split it into two sentences: "among the public. Companies have"
* Despite being in the source, "partnered with" is one of those corporatisms like "solutions", trying make things sound like friendly pals when the article makes clear that "With verified products, it offers companies a choice between paying a percentage of sales, or a flat fee." While the word "partner" is used in the source, it's only applied to P&G, not to multiple companies. So, "Companies have paid them to certify their products." (And even that's going beyond the source; again, it only says that one company has done this; multiple companies have been offered it, but that doesn't tell us how many selected to. We may need to source a second company for the plural)
I'm avoiding article edits at this time, I ask that others review this request and implement as they see fit. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 18:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The first suggestion seems fine to me. For the second, I would suggest adding a comma to make it clearer: "among the public, and companies have". --Leyo 10:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A comma would at least be an improvement. (I'd suggest replacing the "and" with a semicolon, but the antisemicolonialists would just show up.) -- Nat Gertler (talk) 13:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @NatGertler Looks good to me as well. I would also vote for comma vs the semicolon. Did I just discover I am an antisemicolonialists? ;)    talk 17:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeliness
Talk:Lisa Trusel

message: Lisa was the only reason I started watching Days back in 1983. Nice to see she has an article here. DonMEGĂ60645Talk|Contribs 18:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wrecking Crew (comics)

message: At least Hercules understood the nature of battle and stood a -chance- against the Wrecking Crew. The patrons of the bar were all slaughtered for events most of them had no control over; none stood a chance. Lots42 (talk) 17:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Despicable? 

message: Seems to be Avengers 39 (1967), at least for Piledriver. There's also a "Hammerhead" (Bulldozer analogue) and a Thunderboot (a white male). Although they aren't explicitly named as the Wrecking Crew, they are introduced via construction/demolition backdrops and appear to have some considerable power - not enough to stop Hercules from ruining their plan (they are working as the Mad Thinker's henchmen) - but enough to defeat the Scarlet Witch, Quicksilver, Goliath (Pym), the Wasp (van Dyne) and Hawkeye (Barton). 
Their powers are technology based, as Hammerhead's costume, while appearing to be a reinforced neck brace and helmet, can also project images and audio; Thunderboot and Piledriver wear boots and gloves, respectively, that somehow "nullifies gravity" (p16) and are made of some "fantastically hard material" (p15) - assuming that they are all three wearing variations of the same devices, which is reasonable. Presumably these devices were fashioned by the Mad Thinker. They are all captured by the Avengers, while the Thinker escapes (the story is contained in this single issue). While they may be an unrelated group, it's hard to believe they didn't inform the creation of the Wrecking Crew seven years later (or the second Hammerhead, in Spider-Man, five years later). However, characteristic of early Avengers villains, they talk like out-of-work classical hams, and not at all like any of their later namesakes (with the possible exception of Thunderball when he is written as an intellectual). None of them are named other than as their alter egos. 
The issue was edited by Stan Lee, written by Roy Thomas (who became Marvel's Editor-in-Chief in 1972), and drawn by Don Heck with George Bell on inks. 
I have no idea if they or another incarnation reappear before 1974, or even if they come back in #40, 'cause I haven't read it yet :) 92.2.194.149 (talk) 13:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First incarnation
Talk:Rail trail

message: I believe that railbanking and rail trails are two distinct entities, there are a number of undeveloped railbanked right-of-ways, that are not trails at all, mearly "saved" lines. A right of way dosn't become a trail until a surface (natural or otherwise) is established, and public access can be established.
:Rail trails may be on railbanked rights of way under 16 USC 1247(d) (generally implemented by STB during an abandonment proceeding), or on federally granted rights of way under 43 USC 912/913, as modified, or on rights of way acquired in fee or by eminent domain.  Railbanking generally means preserving for future rail reactivation.  Because of increased use of 1247(d) for trail formation, and because it assumes preservation for rail reactivation, the term railbanking has become confused with meaning all rail trails.  Charles Montange 16:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Virtual vs. Tangable Dec 28, 06

message: Why is this discussed in an article on rail trails? CapnZapp (talk) 10:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Now Railbanking is its own article. (Again, but the merger was in 2005 and the content has been substantially expanded since then) CapnZapp (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railbanking 

message: it starts "Rail trail conversions can be complex for legal, social, and economic reasons.[citation needed] Railroads in North America were often built with a mix of purchased land, government land grants, and easements. The land deeds can be over a hundred years old, land grants might be conditional upon continuous operation of the line, and easements may have expired, all expensive and difficult issues to determine at law." Some were built by being taken via "imminent domain" by the government - and limited or NO compensation to the land owner. By one logic no longer in use as a railroad, should have reverted to original owner (or current owner of the original parcel. In some cases - runs through the middle the property parcel. I state some- I will admit know of one specifically that way- no idea if any others that way. IN this case - Rail was built for service to a Defense base. Wfoj3 (talk) 23:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the paragraph still stands, in light of your comment. Are you suggesting any alteration to the text?--Megustalastrufas (talk) 07:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversion Issues 

message: Per WP:IMAGE, images should be to illustrate, not to decorate. The gallery that opens the Europe section appears to be mainly decorative. IMO, we should have no more than one image per country, in that country's section. Does anybody have a convincing reason to retain it? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, one image per country, in that country's section.--Megustalastrufas (talk) 08:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europe gallery excessive?
Talk:Power Rangers (song)

message: Please remember that non-notability is not a criteria for speedy deletion. It should be listed as  or afd instead.  Tivedshambo (talk) 18:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Listing this and other things I have listed for AFD then. Ryulong 18:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Everett Alvarez Jr.

message: There are almost no sources cited for this entry.  Unsupported information will have to eventually be removed.  Also, any material garnered from an editor's interview with the subject violates WP's policy against original research, and will also have to be removed.  Sources, anyone?  --Patchyreynolds (talk) 22:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: CDR Alvarez was the XO at NAS Cecil Field in the late 1970s, early 1980s. BubbleDine (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back in the United States 

message: Everett Alvarez J. may have been the first American pilot shot down and a POW in Vietnam,  but he was not the first American soldier to become a POW in Vietnam. That dubious honor belongs to Donald Morgan who was captured and became a POW in 1954. Ten years before Alvarez. 2601:403:C381:E9F0:9100:DAFF:87AA:F40E (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Everett Alvarez J.
Talk:Langrisser I

message: I added most of the names from the North American version (Warsong) but I can't figure out all of them. If anyone else with better knowledge of the Japanese names would like to match them up, I'll provide the only other americanized names that I know:
* Geryon (Lord who attacks the castle in Stage 1, and commands it in Stage 6)
* Malvese (Barbarian Commander from Stage 3)
* Momus (Fighter attacking Albert/Bayard's fortress in Stage 7)
Also, I've seen a few alternate spellings for some of the Langrisser names floating around, don't know how right they are:
* Narm = Namu
* Volkoff = Volkof = Volkov
* Chris = Kris
* Thorn = Soun
--Cecilkorik 03:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Angelos Charisteas

message: I fixed a few grammar mistakes I saw when reading the article, no content was changed. Nicklob 18:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank You Chaza93</font> 19:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: The phrase "The team failed to earn a single point and finished dead last in the tournament." at the end of Charisteas "International career" has nothing to do with his personal performance and would be more fit in the "Greece NT" page.
I have removed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.159.145 (talk) 01:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Related to Topic

message: With this goal, Charisteas score in three qualifiers for European Championships and for three consecutive World Cups, became the only player to rich that in the Greek national team and probably the only one in Europe.
what does that mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.49.40.163 (talk) 17:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?????
Talk:Rakim & Ken-Y

message: This article does not meet our WP:LIVING policy because it fails to cite sources.  I am not sure what to do about it, but I was not able to find anything myself using Google and some administrators tend to blank pages that violate this particular policy.  If someone else who has an interest in this subject can help it would be appreciated.  Yamaguchi先生 05:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not meeting WP:LIVING

message: no info on web abt dem xcept n spanishSpectacgurl215 22:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  omg!
Talk:Body without organs

message: this is the same text as in the Anti-Oedipus article. Merge? - Ktai 18:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I am just a casual reader of Deleuze but The second last line in the piece struck me as wrong.  Specifically “the full BwO” is not the healthy BwO but is completely withdrawal or “catatonic” as described in the Routledge  publication -9  at the top of page 33 in Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus by Eugene W. Holland  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.60.21 (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you've misunderstood Holland's point. He says that when one withdraws to the full body without organs and rejects completely the desiring machines, one becomes catatonic. The relevant text is "How do you make yourself a BwO?" in Thousand Plateaus. DionysosProteus (talk) 13:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect statements?

message: This article needs translating into English, or possibly English-and-not-crazy. Clement Cherlin (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible 

message: Is this even notable enough to deserve an article? If it is, it certainly deserves a more understandable one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  24.52.79.108  (talk • contribs)  April 2, 2012
This article is now on Reddit with the title So I think I found the least comprehensible article on Wikipedia.. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This post attempts to explain the article.  --George100 (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Never have I been so tempted to replace the content of a Wikipedia article with a cut and paste from a Reddit post. <smile> --Guy Macon (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Least comprehensible article on Wikipedia?
Talk:Downtown Toronto

message: I removed it from the list of downtown neighbourhoods because it isn't generally viewed to be downtown and lies east of the Don River outside of its generally accepted boundaries. - MF —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mattnf (talk • contribs) 06:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Riverdale

message: I am requesting a map of downtown, by anyone who actually knows what the boundaries are. There are some people in the city who think that all of Old Toronto is "downtown", but it would be helpful if there was a map. Blackjays1 (talk) 07:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: I removed Casa Loma from the list of notable downtown sites, as it does not seem to conform with the area outlined in the beginning of the article, being somewhat North of Bloor. S'cool? --PopeUrban (talk) 14:46, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice of Edit

message: Given that this is one of the most populous downtowns on the continent, I'm a bit surprised about how technically sparse the page is in terms of solid facts and statistics.  Most downtown pages list the population and land area in the infobox, at least, and many even have demographic breakdowns.  Is there not a statistical districts that covers the area of downtown Toronto, even generally, that couldn't be included in this article?  What is the population and land area of downtown Toronto? --Criticalthinker (talk) 06:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone?  The boundary given at the opening of the page seems quite expansive.  Is there perhaps a "tighter" definition of the downtown core that has population and land area statistics? --Criticalthinker (talk) 10:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Population and Area
Template talk:User JBU

message: Dwo, Sorry if I missed out on the joke.  The message on the userbox, along with your caustic remark on your userpage, and with my knowledge of some of the problems that have occurred at JBU, led me to believe that it was a rather poignant response to those problems.  However, it seems to imply a rather cold hearted intellectual atmosphere present at JBU, regardless of the above and may be better to alter it.<I>~ The Rebel At ~</I> 18:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Humor?

message: The language used in this template is not advocating a point of view that JBU students are heartless creatures. If that were the POV that it is promoting, than I myself would be promoting a POV that I disagree with. I love JBU.
What this template is trying to do, in a humourous way, is make fun of the school's old motto. The old school's motto was "Head, Heart and Hand", and, despite it no longer being the official motto, it still appears in various places and still acts as a second motto of sorts. When you make contributions to Wikipedia, usually, you are using your hands to type characters on the keyboard; you use your mind to think about statements, but your heart has absolutely no function except its normal, involuntary pumping of blood to the organs while the head and hand are performing tasks that they wouldn't otherwise perform in a prone state. This statement is an inside joke meant to be understood by JBU students. In various other university userboxes, humourous statments are made and even statements that are (gasp) POV! Go Owls! Go 'Cats! Go Pirates! These are statments that actively promote a school and therefore are not NPOV. It would seem that that's okay. So, even if this were trying to promote a certain POV, why would that be bad? — D. Wo. 00:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You explained the joke clearly, as all I needed was input to make sure it wasn't a depreciating comment against John Brown U. Students.  Sense of humor is relative, so what may be amusing and clear to you, not so much to others.  I can understand wanting to replace the neutral userbox on the Education page with your original one, but redirecting the neutral box to yours is overkill.  I'll be restoring it to its own seperate existence, so it might exist for those who may not share your sense of humor or desire to include the joke in their representation of their collegiate experience.<I>~ The Rebel At ~</I> 12:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  THIS IS NOT POV!
Talk:K. K. Downing

message: Seriously, who's bright idea was it to throw in pretty much every single interview quote over a small debacle involving him not being asked to rejoin? Is it really so important in the grand scheme of things that it can't be summed up in just one or two paragraphs? It makes the article feel very disproportionate. If a reader really wants to know this much specific detail they can seek it out themselves, surely? Vicious Friendly Fish (talk) 01:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added in the  template which might incentivize some condensation of the content. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Got to agree with you on this one. The section reads like a defense of KK Downing in his conflict about Priest that overshadows the rest of the article. Kickysam49 (talk) 02:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "leaving Judas Priest" section 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jeff Arquilla (talk) 17:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 1101 053

message: Why is this section not its own article yet? They are about to release their second album. ChallengingAnthropocentrism (talk) 02:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  KK's Priest
Template talk:MedalSummary

message: I really like what you've done with this template, and I think it will really help on the pages. The only thing I dislike are those silly icons for the medals. I think they are ridiculous and it would look a lot cleaner with them gone. Sue Anne 18:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone!  I didn't like them either, but I thought that's what the unofficial standard was.  Thanks for the vote of confidence, Andrwsc 04:11, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk
Talk:Craig Goldy

message: Can someone tell me exactly why it's so important to specify that Craig Goldy is Christian? I don't see on other pages "so-and-so is a Muslim" or "so-and-so is an Atheist"... IronChris  |  (talk) 16:25, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Craig's religion 

message: What is this stuff about Mu Alpha Chi? Is that for real, I can't find reference to it anywhere else...--70.116.27.132 04:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mu Alpha Chi?

message: I think I remember reading that Ronnie James Dio produced the Rough Cutt demos with Craig Goldy, but I can't seem to find info on this now. Can anyone confirm or deny this? I know that Ronnie James Dio produced Rough Cutt demos with Jake E. Lee, who Craig Goldy replaced in Rough Cutt. Gringo300 (talk) 19:30, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rough Cutt with Craig Goldy
Talk:Holmes and Rahe stress scale

message: Still working on this... hope to organize the scale itself better when I have more time. --Kirstenweasley, July 12, 2006
Looks like it was lifted straight from another web site, except for the first paragraph, which included this meaningless phrase, "... and it is very likely that some participants view life events as positive or negative, depending on the person". --JanesDaddy 08:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page should really be moved to Holmes and Rahe stress scale, no caps and no 'the'.  Any objections?  WLU 14:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Just wondering why 'change of residence' doesn't appear on the non-adult chart.--Tyranny Sue (talk) 01:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-adults & change of residence? 

message: I recall learning that the death of a child equals the death of a spouse but I can't find a source yet. Regardless, death of a child is not listed.  Anyone know the answer?--192.77.126.50 (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I also found it odd that was missing.  The death of a child would surely be 100.  No doubt about it.  63.92.248.121 (talk) 02:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Death of a child?

message: I have some information on the scale at my office; I'll check re "Death of a child."
The correlation of 0.118 doesn't look right.  It's not high enough to be significant.  Any correlation of 0.3 or below could be a chance relationship.  R. Morgan, Ph.D. (Rsmtime@yahoo.com)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.27.96.54 (talk) 01:30, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Death of a child, correlation

message: like starting a new job, a change in Career, and unemployment. 69.235.214.188 (talk) 05:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  They forgot Job stress .... 

message: Thats really all there is to it, but this page is not good. The information presented is unclear, as are its effects. It in no way explains why positive effects can lead to stressful illness. For that matter, it doesnt explain what the meaning of a "life change unit" is and why its bad. It certainly implies that its bad.
Though I don't like to go down this path, I don't see any reason (considering the complaints even before my own) that this article should exist. It is, as of right now, completely and utterly pointless and worthless. It should probably be deleted. 74.132.249.206 (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not good. 

message: Thee table is also printed in Zimbardo, psycholgy. There death of a close friend is at second position with 73 scores. Is there something wrong either in this table or in Zimbardo?--92.193.100.134 (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction to Zimbardo