Talk:Delta wave

message: Not sure about "..Delta activity is characterized by frequencies under 4 Hz and is absent in awake healthy adults, but is physiological and normal in awake children under the age of 13." 
As far as I know there is some delta activity in waking adults therefore it is not absent. Do you have a reference for the statement??? Nk.sheridan   Talk 17:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to dig into some things to find a good reference without just throwing Niedermeyer's (EEG Bible) arbitrarily at you; but, it would work. For now, as a Registered EEG tech, I will note that awake adults do not typically exhibit EEG activity slower than alpha frequencies of 8-12 (some exceptions as you get older in the theta range) unless they are getting drowsy, or have some sort of impairment from disease, trauma, or chemical influence. Young children can have slower frequencies normally, particularly when they are drowsy. The amplitude of children's EEG is generally much higher as well. Cronides2 (talk) 17:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

text: yeah ok, it could be "children" I suppose, though if you look at the 2nd paragraph of Infant the definition works... But it's years and not months. XApple 11:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not

message: The introduction of REM_sleep and Delta wave page claim different things:
* A newborn baby spends more than 80% of total sleep time in REM.
* Infants have been shown to spend a great deal of time in slow-wave sleep, and thus have more delta wave activity. In fact, delta-waves are the predominant wave forms of infants. Analysis of the waking EEG of a newborn infant indicates that delta wave activity is predominant in that age, and still appears in a waking EEG of five-year-olds. 
This definitely needs looking at. --Melarish (talk) 13:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with REM sleep page 

message: According to the slow-wave sleep article:
"As of 2008, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) has discontinued the use of stage 4,[2][3][4] such that the previous stages 3 and 4 now are combined as stage 3. "
This article continues to use stage 4 sleep and should be updated or justified.72.172.1.109 (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage 4 Sleep 

message: While I don't trust everything in Doctor Who to be true the Doctor played by Christopher Eccleston attempted to use a Delta Wave to destroy all life on Earth. Is a Delta Wave dangerous? Or would it have to be amplified to be dangerous? I read the article but it doesn't state if it is missing this information, or just if it is just science fiction. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 16:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Pure science fiction!  We all have them in our brains quite frequently, and we're still here. I suppose that someone could create a huge amount of ionizing radiation at delta frequency, and use it as a weapon, but it would have nothing to do with it being delta, per se, and that's an esoteric quibble. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's that solved then! My plans for world domination are foiled! Thanks a lot for the response. Have a nice day ツ Jenova20 (email) 10:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're very welcome (or should I say "zap"?). --Tryptofish (talk) 23:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: {Tumbleweed} =P ツ Jenova20 (email) 08:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Can a Delta Wave be deadly?

message: The "Holonomic Brain Theory" link at the bottom is to a junk theory, it does not belong in any basic neuroscience article. I am deleting it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lithoppsosite (talk • contribs) 23:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Junk Link