lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Transitive reduction

message: IMO the article suffers from a graph-centric organisation,
in that it starts out with relations in the summary, but
then continues to talk only about graphs.
I wanted to add the formula R' = R - (R^+-D)^2 (D is the diagonal (x,x)),
but there is no good place to put it as things are organised right
now. 
85.182.77.242 (talk) 23:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also not quite right unless the relation is antisymmetric and pseudo-atomic (or finite).  There are minimal reductions if the relation is transitive and quasi-finitary, but it's not that simple.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 01:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation vs. Graph 

message: Isn't a transitive reduction of a relation required to be a subset of that relation? Rp (talk) 16:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No response, so let me try again with an example: Rp (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks - I have found the article and found this out myself.  But it's really confusing not to explain this clearly, considering the name reduction. Rp (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: I have come to realize that my confusion was not only caused by cycles, but is also contained within them.
Suppose we define the transitive acyclic reduction TAR(R) of a relation R as follows:
give each edge in R weight 0 if it is on a cycle, 1 if it is not; then TAR(R) contains exactly the edges in R that are not connected with a path of total weight > 1.  In words: reduce just the acyclic part, without touching the cycles.  TAR(R) is still what I would call a reduction: it is unique and a subset of R.
Now consider the cyclic parts: the set of strongly connected components of R.  Each component "reduces" to a cycle on each of its elements, but any such cycle will do, and none may be present in the component, so this is neither determinate nor strictly a reduction.  Aho et al.'s transitive reduction is the result of doing this component-wise, either before or after taking the TAR - the two are independent.  Hence it seems more natural to treat TAR and component reduction as separate operations.  Is there any citable work that does this?  If there is, it may be helpful to add it to this article. Rp (talk) 11:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reducing the acyclic part only
Talk:Intensive journal method

message: I have reverted the edit to read that it was "developed by 1966 at Drew University" because development took place over many years but the core techniques seem to have largely been in place by that year. Development did not start nor end in 1966 but it was in a currently recognizable form by this time. If there is a substantive citation to contradict this, please provide it. Thanks! Rorybowman 03:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of Method Over Many Years
Talk:Munkacs (Hasidic dynasty)

message: This page should be made to resemble other pages referenced by the List of Hasidic dynasties page.  In particular, there needs to be a more general introduction, including an outline of the lineage of the dynasty, which has been so well done on many other Hasidic Dynasty pages. 
Spir 06:48, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

message: There should be some consistency in spelling. The title is Munkacz, but the body of the article spellis it Munkacs. What are the arguments for/against the various spellings? – Redaktor 12:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Hungarian spelling is Munkacs. "Munkatch," I suppose, is an English phonetic spelling. --NYCJosh (talk) 23:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Munkatch (spelling) 

message: I have a couple photos of the all-but-abandoned Munkacz kollel in Nahlaot, Jerusalem, which I offer for use on this article if the editor finds it fitting.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jewschool/486548988/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jewschool/486580543/
Mobius1ski 18:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article mentions several seforim, incl. the Minchas Elazar. As to customs, visit your local Hung. chasidic community for a general idea or, better yet, one of the Minkacser or Dinever communities themselves.--NYCJosh (talk) 23:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Munkacz photo
Talk:List of AMD Turion processors

message: Perhaps this this article should be named "List of AMD Turion 64 microprocessors".  After all the Turion article is about something different.  (Personally, I think separating Turion 64 and Turion 64 X2 was a bad choice.) DHR 07:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  article title 

message: The CPUs listed under Turion 64 X2 "Trinidad" are actualy "Taylor" for Socket S1.
http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/notebook/SideBySide.aspx?opn=TMDTL56HAX5CT&opn=TMDTL52HAX5CT
:I'm not sure what you're trying to show with that link. I don't see anything that lists the codenames there... jgp TC 10:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  error? 

message: Out of curiousity why are the dates in different formats? cKaL 20:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because not all of the dates are wikilinked, and you have your preferences set to display dates in something other than US style. — Aluvus t/c 20:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: I've seen some articles that mention
"With the exceptions of Sempron-branded processors and Turion K8 Rev E processors, all notebook processors shipped by AMD include AMD-V and therefore support Windows 7 XP mode"
But I cannot find Turion K8 anywhere here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.207.3 (talk) 00:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "Turion K8" (not Athlon 64..) 

message: There are Headlines:
 Single-core Mobile processors
 Dual-Core Mobile processors
Then there are single and dual cores listet in the same table: this is misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.153.44.113 (talk) 20:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dual vs. single core 

message: Why is the article outdated?
Somebody added that in may 2010, can i remove the outdated-section now?
Or give a reason for it being outdated, please... --here@llyis@dj (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated? 

message: The tables do not seem to be coordinated with those in the Phenom article. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 17:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordination
Talk:Music of Canberra

message: Off the current list, the following could perhaps be considered as having made   
    Canberra City Band
    Fred Smith
    The Idea of North
    Koolism
    Owen Campbell
    Sidewinder
Will continue investigating, as these are just the ones I could verify somewhat easily
Other bands/artists/influencers that could be included: 
* Safia
* Ernest Llewellyn founder- school of music
* Armoured Angel for their metal for the brain festival 
* Doug Anthony All Stars buskers turned super stars
Other (not sure but these seems to have made an impact)
* Falling Joys
* peking duk
Orangedrummaboy (talk) 03:54, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

message: House of Reps  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.91.9.215 (talk) 04:59, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hedge witchcraft

message: "Hedgewitch" is not a modern term made up by Rae Beth. Is there anyway of rearranging this so that factual information is put on top? Shall I rewrite it?--Toadsboon 07:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The term is also widely used in fantasy, rather different:  a low level magician.  And what, pray tell, was it redefined from?  Goldfritha 17:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fantasy
Talk:Vault (sculpture)

message: 23 July 2009 - changed 'career' to 'existence' - I don't think a sculpture can have a 'career'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.131.45 (talk) 02:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: changed 'career' to 'existence'

message: Would the user who nominated this page NPOV kindly point out the problem, I will fix it once I know what it isSills bend 07:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Jean Armour Polly

message: It seems that this article has been deleted twice before for copying her bio from her website - something I didn't see before writing it again, mostly based on the info on her website.
I've done some additional checking (ISOC BoT minutes, for instance), used my own words for the facts, and added in some more info from other sources. But at what point do we pass from "taking information from a page" (OK) and "copying from a page" (not OK)?
Guidance appreciated. --Alvestrand 07:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for needing copyright release? 

message: Someone took out the sentence crediting her with coining the "surfing the Internet" phrase.
I think that's well documented and widely credited, so I restored it. --Alvestrand 06:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Surfing the Internet"
Talk:Raghuvaran

message: Are we sure that the DOB added here is Raghuvaran's--not Rajinikanth's? - Rrjanbiah (talk) 05:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DOB check

message: Lot of news sites are leeching info from Wikipedia on his death; so the info here should be accurate. I doubt that he is from Kerala or Malayalee. Most magazines say he is from Coimbatore. Can anyone bring citation? (Remember, many sites leech info from here) --Rrjanbiah (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: he is malayalee and from kollenkode, palakkad district  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.65.200.180 (talk) 07:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks, do you know his DOB too (aged 59 or 49?; I think 59) -- Rrjanbiah (talk) 14:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth place check 

message: Prasan can you tell me what sort of a person he was as a child? And why do you call him anna?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joellabc (talk • contribs) 04:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prasan can you tell me what sort of a person he was as a child? And why do you call him anna?
Talk:Norteiro people

message: I've cleaned up the article a bit, some may dislike the section headings, but some were needed, and that's the best I can come up with.  Change them if you don't like them.  But this article is still in need of more solid facts, particularly dates. --The Human Spellchecker 07:25, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: What is meant by Pombal enfranchising Goa? Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pombal . . .
Talk:Moe High School

message: So far I find no reliable sources to verify this school.  I found this, but its merely one person's experience of working at the school.  So, while I think its very likely this school was real, I think it fails WP:V.  Please add any sources you know of.  --Rob 07:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verifiability

message: *2003 reference to 50th anniversary of opening of school--A  Y  Arktos 00:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1953 and other info 

message: I'm removing the following material until sources can be found:
:It operated in 1980; the date that the school opened can be inferred from the school song:
:We began, you'll agree,
:In the year '53,
:In the bush on the verge of Moe.
:In a manner small,
:Not great at all,
:We were not the least bit showy.
:But we worked with a will,
:For culture and skill,
:And the growth of our in-born powers.
:You can keep all the rest,
:We'll stick to the best,
:And the best school of all is ours.
:The school was demolished sometime between 1997 and 2003 to make way for residential development.
Dpbsmith (talk) 17:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing material until source is found 

message: Why does this redirect to Moe City? It should just be removed if there is no info. Eaglemist (talk) 23:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moe High School
Talk:Nine Worthies

message: Judas Maccabeus actually appears in the Apocrypha, not the Old Testament, so his listing under the latter category is technically incorrect. Willy Logan 07:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

message: It's now less clear that non-Christians who date from after the rise of Christianity were not eligible for consideration... AnonMoos (talk) 10:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent rewrites

message: The article currently says: "(The three Worthies actually named in the play include two not on the original list, Hercules and Pompey the Great, as well as Alexander.)" But I think more are named in the play - Hector and Judas Maccabaeus at least - see http://web.uvic.ca/~mbest1/ISShakespeare/LLL/LLL5.2c.html - so, was something else meant by the statement? --David Edgar (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Worthies named in Love's Labour's Lost

message: The current article states that the Nine Worthies were first described by Jacques de Longuyon in 1312. But the Dutch version of this article, http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negen_Besten, states that they were described in a text by Jacob an Maerlant which was written "after 1291", but presumable also before ca. 1300 (since that is when Van Maerlant died). Anyone who knows more about this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.163.98.151 (talk) 11:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Earliest source?

message: Late 15th-century images of the attributed arms of the worthies have been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons: -- AnonMoos (talk) 02:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Attributed coat of arms images
Talk:Nucleoside triphosphate

message: The article titled "nucleotide" provides great explanation for nucleotides as well as nucleoside mono-, di- and triphosphates.
the sake of technical terminology, nucleotides are given classifications as nucleosides with a prefix describing the number of phosphates present in a specific unit. For example, if a nucleotide has one phosphate, it is a nucleoside monophosphate (NMP). 
Suffix, surely?  Have changed it at any rate.
Confuseddave 15:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/Participants

message: Someone who is not me put this on the list:
: ((User:Tenebrae|Tenebrea))  I love the silver age, Main intrest DC silver age plus Archie superhero Tenebrae
I can't imagine Archie Comics ever had a superhero called Tenebrae!
I'll add myself properly to the list. Boy, that was weird ... meaningless identity theft! :-)  Tenebrae 07:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Impostor?

message: I've been contributing to Wiki for a while but I'm still a very amateur editor.  I'm a Comics Professional who's worked for Marvel, DC, Image and Dark Horse over the last 30 years.  And for whatever that's worth, I just wanted to offer any assistance to anyone who might require it.
I'm pretty expert about my time in comics... but I guess, as is usual in any specific business, the "employees" know a lot more about the internal Politics than the minutia of released books.
I think Wiki is a seriously cool thing.  I'm a big fan of this "Digital" Encyclopedia… It's one of the coolest things to happen on the net.  And it allows folks who are brimming with passion and information to share that info as part of a cool Encyclopedia. 
Albabe (talk) 19:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offering Assistance 

message: My first symbol is *, should I be at the top above the numbers or at the bottom?★Trekker (talk) 18:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where should I be?
Talk:List of Alaska Native tribal entities

message: Just a reminder to those editing the article, please see the notation in the lead which states "Note that while the names of Alaska Native tribal entities often include "Village of" or "Native Village of," in most cases, the tribal entity cannot be considered as identical to the city, town, or census-designated place in which the tribe is located, as some residents may be non-tribal members and a separate city government may exist." This is important. Where there is a link to a city it is linked to the section of the article which talks about the tribal entity that exists within the town or city. Cheers and thank you for contributing! --ARoseWolf 19:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tribal Entities vs Towns and cities
Talk:Ulrich Zasius

message: Hi, I would like to point out that "Ulric Zasius" is spelled "Ulrich Zasius" following the article in German Wikipedia (he was German): http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulrich_Zasius. I tried to change it but couldn't. Thanks -- Ecclesia 08:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:AMCOTW candidate

message: Feel free to add an image with your nomination by using the Image and Size parameters as described above - Squilibob 08:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the image parameters because with issues dealing with fair use. In short, fair use images can only be used in article space, but not in templates or talk pages according to WP:FUC. --TheFarix (Talk) 15:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Category talk:Buildings and structures in Los Angeles

message: The Walter Pyramid is in Long Beach. Is this intended to include the whole county? -Will Beback 08:17, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should. The LA category covers Greater LA. Choalbaton 06:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope

message: This list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Art_Deco_architecture includes buildings not on this page.217.205.224.155 (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing items
Talk:Ceramics

message: The former article Ceramics has been moved to Ceramic, and its talk page is now Talk:Ceramic.
----
I have edited (hopefully) every link to this page that should point to Ceramic, and have made this into a disambiguation page, to try and reduce the confusion between the fine art and the material. I made a new article for the fine art, since I couldn't find one. I have not edited links to this page that relate to the fine art, since the article for that may move to a new title once the Arts folks notice it.--Srleffler 06:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: With only two items, and with the "s" difference, you really don't need a disambig page. Redirect this page to Ceramics (art). And each page already has a pointer at the top to the other if people wind up at the wrong page. You will have to check and change any links to this page that should point to Ceramic. Finally, you made your comment at Wikipedia:Disambiguation_pages_with_links/2006-03-26_dump, and it should have been at the latest one: Wikipedia:Disambiguation_pages_with_links/2006-05-18_dump. Simon12 21:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. Once all the pages that should link to ceramic (the type of material) have been fixed, this article should be a redirect to Ceramics (art).--Srleffler 21:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: * Done. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ceramics is now a redirect to Ceramic art, and  has been added to the article Ceramic art.  Ceramics, as generally defined, refers to objects made of the material ceramic.  The article Ceramic art is the most appropriate article covering all objects made of ceramic.  For a source on defining ceramic & ceramics, see: Dodd, Arthur & David Murfin, Dictionary of Ceramics Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, 2007.   - Appendix A - The definition of 'Ceramics'. Cheers Gmcbjames (talk) 18:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Pottery is a much better redirect, covering building ceramics etc.  Clearly not all ceramics are artistic.  The current Ceramic art remains a disaster area, which cannot remain for long. Johnbod (talk) 22:46, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected to Ceramic art
Talk:Elizabeth Zimmermann

message: And please.. Give us a chance to fill this out, instead of blindly deleting it. --Jerry 21:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Place holder

message: I've removed the claim that she was the "first knitter" to have a NY Times obituary. The claim was unsourced and implausible since a knitter is simply a person who knits. HazelAB (talk) 00:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  obituary 
Talk:Edgar Crookshank

message: CROOKSHANK, EDGAR MARCH, M.B. Lond. (Honours in Obst.) 1884, M.R.C.S. Eng. 1881 (King's Coll.); Exhib. and Gold Medallist in Anat. 1st M.B. Lond. 1879; Fell. King's Coll.; Mem. Roy. Micros. Soc. and Path. Soc.; Prof, of Comp. Path, and Bacteriol. King's Coll.; late House Surg. King's Coll. Hosp., and Civil Surg. Med. Staff Egyptian Campaign (Medal and Clasp, Tel-el-Kebir, and Khedive's Star).  CDN99 Bit of a shock to find he was so well qualified? What is your justification for removing the text of his statements from out of his book?  Are you suggesting he didn't write that? john 08:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased editing
Talk:Ron Stoppable

message: I saw that comment in the Trivia section of this article. Maybe that simply means Middleton runs a West Coast offense or something else that uses a running back as a regular target (like the 49ers did with Roger Craig or Ricky Watters).  WAVY 10 15:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or, alternatively, the quarterback got flushed out of the pocket, none of the wideouts were free, and the quarterback wisely threw to safety valve Ron instead.  Or it's a trick play.  Or, most likely of all, since they were in a hurry-up mode for a comeback, they shifted Ron over to tight end to have another viable target--his speed would be valuable when you're trying to make yards after the catch in a two-minute drill.  Rdfox 76 19:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Possible, but I'm almost sure they showed him cathing two separate passes. Ace-o-aces 04:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think any of those could be possible (no pun intended). WAVY 10 14:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Running back though operating as a wide receiver 

message: Nothing personal, but I changed the image because I think that we should start off the section on Ron's personality on a high note, and leave pictures of dark Ron until it is explained who and what dark Ron is.
perfectblue 14:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  image change 

message: I think this article could use a bit of a cleanup. It just seems more cluttered then it needs to be. --Erased Paper 06:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Is it known for sure if Ron being the Supreme Monkey Master will be revealed in the season finale?  Because I remember the page saying something about the MMP ending storyline wasn't that Oh No Yono!--The K.O. King 01:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: I think that the article needs more pictures. It is also a little long. But other than that, Good Job! :D Dinobert 02:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures