lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arab tribes of Iraq

message: I just checked out this map and typed it up. Someone might want to compare what is on this article with the tribes listed in this map. MPS 22:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The HIC map as source

message: I was thinking about this some more. Another way to organize it might be to list all the families and tribes all together and then talk about them elswhere or in a table. MPS 22:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another way to organise

message: The section on the Al Ayoubi family, under 'Tikrit area' is surely just vandalism?  It's more like a eulogy than an encylopedia entry.  Can anyone who knows more than I do advise whether this contains any valid content?  Earthlyreason (talk) 14:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not objective? 

message: The title of this article seems to suggest that not every tribe in Iraq is Arab. I know of other ethnic groups like the Kurds, Assyrians, Turkmen but I don't think "tribe" are used to describe their groups. In fact the word "arab" is not even used in the lead section. So is the word "arab" even necessary in the title?--Prisencolin (talk) 01:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Non arab tribes of Iraq?
Talk:Arthur Tooth

message: This article has been marked for having little citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smoozle (talk • contribs) 02:26, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad citations. 
Talk:Scorched (2003 film)

message: The article currently contains two paragraphs starting with the phrase "The film was notable as a major box office bomb." This is not a conclusion supported by Box Office Mojo as claimed by Big Bird since that site merely reports raw numbers, it did not call the movie a bomb or similar term, and there is no commonly accepted definition of "box office bomb" from which to draw such a conclusion. To claim something is notable you must provide a reference showing that someone made note of it, in other words find a reliable source describing the movie as a bomb. Given the lack of evidence of notability, this passage does not bear repeating in the lead section and I'm removing it from there and adding a  tag to the other section where it occurs. I have no objection to removing the tag and putting the passage back in the lead once proper references for the statement are found.--RDBury (talk) 15:27, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed both instances of the phrase "Box office bomb" and refrained from using the term "notable". The blurb about the performance should be included in the lead paragraph per WP:LEAD and beacuse it was this fact that caused the article to be featured in the WP:DYK section of the main page. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 15:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm satisfied, thanks.--RDBury (talk) 16:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box office bomb (Double rv)
Talk:European heat wave of 2006

message: I don't think this article should be deleted, unless there's little more that can be added.  Maybe instead it should be mentioned in an article called Heatwaves or something. --CCFreak2K 21:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Agree : But the other page must be moved here, my apologizies for the incorrect capatilization once again. --SonicX 22:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion vote
Talk:Community of the Resurrection

message: The former article was poor, not updated and contained in some cases incorrect information. In agreement with the Community of the Resurrection, I have made a totally revision of this article. Br Daniel CR/Edlef (talk • contribs) 10:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision

message: "in its broad nature" isn't English. What is intended by this expression. CR is definitely niche, not mainstream.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:5988:EC00:8998:C99D:4524:6531 (talk) 12:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The community reflects Anglicanism in its broad nature
Talk:Star Fox (1983 video game)

message: I changed a few instances of the word copyright to trademark in this entry because the two seemed to have been confused by the original contributer. 
A trademark is not the same as a copyright.  Trademarks are specific usually for brand image  and also to distinguish a product's content from similar competing products.  Trademarks usually are registered for short period of time and do expire by default when not being used or no longer renewed.  Copyrights do not expire for long periods of time, even if abandoned.  Also two (or more) different movies, books, video games, etc. can have the same name and all still all be in copyright separate from one another (An example being Crash (1996 film) and Crash (2004 film)).  --KeoniPhoenix 11:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trademarks and Copyrights 

message: Sorry, when practically the entire article is about how the game's trademark caused a later unrelated game to be renamed in certain regions, it makes you wonder if the article should even exist. How about some more about the game itself?76.226.142.85 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is horrible
Talk:MPAA

message: I added the link to My Parents Are Aliens here, deleting the redirect to Motion Picture Association of America since a "see also" template at the top of the latter page would make little sense.
EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 21:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Far less sense than MPAA not redirecting to the association, which is what it means 99.9% of the time. --Golbez 06:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Tuscumbia, Courtland and Decatur Railroad

message: I cut the claim that it was the first "railroad to be built west of the Appalachian Mountains in the United States". The Pontchartrain Rail-Road in New Orleans is clearly also west of the Appalachians, and predates it by a couple years. Discuss "first" claims on Talk:Oldest railroads in North America. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 21:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When I wrote that, the article gave the start date as 1836, postdating the Pontchartrain; the 1829 start date now predates that. By the way, when were steam locomotives introduced to the line? -- Infrogmation 00:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  And now I see it's at 1832-34, and no claim is made as to being first west of the Appalacian. -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First in the west

message: These contemporary sources, courtesy of Google Books, can be used to expand and improve this article. - Dravecky (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future expansion
Talk:Wetsuit boots

message: I understand why the article was reverted: the way it is laid out now does present the information in a clearer format. However, I feel that there can be a way to have a more cohesive, polished feel to the article while still maintaining clarity. I'll try and come up with some options later and will post them on this page prior to making any substantive changes to the layout of the article. Also, I uploaded a picture I think helps illustrate bootees for those unfamiliar with the subject. --Douglas Whitaker 21:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Layout 

message: Further to the kayaking comment above, I am surprised that there is no information regarding the use of the bootie in other watersports... I can put in some information...
Wholenewlevelofcool (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Surfing and other watersports use

message: Merge content into Wetsuit and redirect. Article content scope is a minor proper subset of Wetsuit and does not justify a stand-alone article. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections, so have done the merge. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 16:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Predatory mortgage lending

message: ATTENTION HOMEOWNERS! The mortgage service industry has come up with yet another way to unfairly extract money from unsuspecting homeowners through its practice of imposing “force placed insurance” on borrowers who may already have active policies protecting their homes. 
This typically occurs when a mortgage service company buys an existing mortgage from the original lender, and then sends one or more notice(s) to the borrower advising that such company has acquired the mortgage and will be responsible for servicing the loan.  These notices also typically include a demand (buried inconspicuously in the text of the notice) that the borrower promptly provide proof of hazard insurance, or an insurance policy selected by the mortgage service company will be purchased on its behalf.  Not surprisingly, borrowers frequently overlook these notices (which look like mass mailers), or simply disregard the request to provide proof of insurance knowing that they already have an active policy protecting their property.  Of course, this furnishes unscrupulous mortgage service companies with precisely the opportunity they are looking for…     
When the borrower overlooks the notice, or fails for whatever reason to provide proof of insurance by the designated date, the mortgage service company purchases a “force placed” policy for the borrower at a rate that is often three times greater than the cost of comparable insurance available on the market, while burying the cost of this insurance in the mortgage.  Thus, the borrower often discovers this fact, if at all, only months later when it notices the higher payment premium reflected on its monthly statement.  These higher premiums may in some cases result in the imposition of late fees, additional interest, attorneys’ fees, defaults and, in the most extreme cases, foreclosure, even though the borrower at all times maintained appropriate hazard insurance on the property.    
The Law Offices of Theodore F. Monroe is investigating such unfair and unconscionable practices by mortgage service companies.  If you feel that you are a victim of such practices, please visit our website at: www.tfmlaw.com or contact us via e-mail at: mortgagefraudlaw@yahoo.com.
:OK then... can we have some links to some outside sources on this. Please? I thinks its not really good form to post blanket statements about things, even in the discussion page without supporting evidence.
:Thank you
:Piercetp 06:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Would it be possible for someone with knowledge of mortgage practices worldwide to edit this article and bring it within standards.
Thank you
Piercetp 22:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About worldview statement
Talk:Delaware Park–Front Park System

message: I deleted the section on the parks system, and provided a link to the main Buffalo Parks System article which I would like to see developed and expanded. This article needs pictures! Maybe I'll take some this weekend. --128.205.111.143 21:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page is very similar to Buffalo, New York parks system. Can they be merged? In not and this is intended only to highlight the Olmsted Parks, should this be renamed to the "Buffalo Olmsted Park System"? Meanwhile the other page highlights all the parks in buffalo?Caityspeakstruth (talk) 21:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal OR Name Change
Talk:E (Cyrillic)

message: It looks like the Euro symbol, only backwards. I'm an idiot. 67.188.172.165 21:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Backwards Euro

message: This letter is only used for the /e/ sound in Russian, whilst in other Slavic languages using Cyrillic it is represented by “Е”. I suggest, to avoid confusion, this article is renamed to a more specific name. 81.106.110.155 (talk) 09:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article to Russian E or a similar title
Talk:We Are the Pipettes

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 12:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We Are The Pipettes →  – Article was previously at target title but was moved in 2010. So far as I can tell, per MOS:TITLECAPS and MOS:THEBAND, there's no exception where the current capitalization would be proper. QuietHere (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 March 2023
Talk:No One Knows

message: Also this song (or at least part of it) is used in the British Motor show Fifth Gear in the 'Shoot-Out' section
Am I the only one who doesn't hear the riff from No One Knows in Cold Sore Superstars at all? FSFunky 11:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Used on
Talk:Freeman's Journal

message: What was its relationship to the Weekly Freeman? Bastie 21:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:T206

message: I just added some interesting material about the most famous card, cited to a LA Times article on its recent sale.  Head's up for whoever might want to add more here. --Bobak 19:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some additional material in [[Honus_Wagner#T206_Baseball_card]] 

message: "Hindu - Found in both brown ink and red ink (rare)". So which is rare, the Hindu, or the red ink variety?  Trekphiler (talk) 08:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I figure that a card with both inks is rare, which would mean the Hindu back is rare. Nishkid64 (talk) 08:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you source & include that? It's not clear as is...  Trekphiler (talk) 09:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tip a rarey?
Talk:Same !@$ Different Day

message: It needs to be changed to "Same !@#$ Different Day" minus the quotations. --Xxplosive 22:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Title
Talk:Mass wasting

message: During the 25+ years I have worked with geomorphology mass movement has always been the generic term. Is the use of mass wasting perhaps prefered by some English speakers? In lingua franca and American literature mass movement dominates completely, in my experience. --Lindorm 22:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also believe it should be named "Mass Movement". "Mass Wasting" sounds very strange for me. Danuthaiduc (talk) 12:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In my (mainly UK) experience, "Mass wasting" is the term normally used. However, from the number of googlehits, it looks like "Mass movement" is used just about as often and should be there in the lead at least as an alternative. Mikenorton (talk) 19:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Well I believe the term is and American one that is also used in Australia. But Mass movement is a better description and doesn't sound like nature is wastfull. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 04:37, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Mass Wasting and not Mass Movement?

message: Do denudation and subsidence really belong here?
:They don't - moved to the "See also" section. Thanks for pointing that out. Mikenorton (talk) 08:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Mitigation

message: Mass wasting 105.161.101.161 (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography form 3
Talk:Vid Mask

message: VID mask is not VID: it is the symbol of VID which was widely debated in Russia. Abc85 22:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I never said they are the same thing.  The mask, however, is a symbol of that company.  Unless you are able to expand this stub beyond a few paragraphs, I suggest you merge it into the article about the company.  A lot of content about the mask overlaps with what's already there anyway.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 22:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Average Joe (2003 TV series)

message: I would like to move this article to Average Joe (show) for two reasons:
#To create untiy w/ other entertainment program articles which also have "(show)" in their title
#I am planning on creating an article on the actual Average Joe concept, refering to the average American
If now comments are made within 7 days, I'm just going to go ahead and move the article-so feel free to chime in. Best Regards, SignaturebrendelHAPPY HOLIDAYS 06:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I conducted the move. Regards, Signaturebrendel 21:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: I added a wikification checklist and started the process 
:DLPanther 21:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: DLPanther 22:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification
Template talk:Other Indiana Stations

message: I can barely read most of the characters on this template, and i have a 21 inch plamsa screen. I'm considering on increasing the size of the fonts on this template. and if you're curious, my resolution is maxed out, at 2048x1024.  User:Raccoon Fox • Talk 22:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The template is all right, but it could use a little retooling. I want to to propose a re tooling of the template
(Aeverine Frathleen Nieves 21:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template is okay
Talk:York University (YRT)

message: I'm a Toronto area TTC rider, but not a VIVA rider (so you get my context); The second paragraph about the stop being considered part of York Region isn't exactly clear. Can someone clarify this paragraph of the article? Without reading other articles, I don't know how 'being considered part of York region' affects the service. What is the consequence of it being considered so? And as for the TCC conflict? That is a bit unclear as well. Were people taking the orange line FROM Downsview to York? is that the conflict? or from York to Downsview? both? The paragraph just needs clarity, and I don't have the required information to do so. TheHYPO 22:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully it's clearer now?  PKT(alk) 18:38, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Neverwinter Nights: Hordes of the Underdark

message: The entire article needs to be rewritten. As it is, it's basically a game guide, which according to WP:NOT means that it can be subject to deletion. I tried to make it at least third person, though it's a pretty cruddy job. --PresN 22:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I always struggle in deciding exactly where the line is drawn between being a guide and being encyclopedic. Clearly some information has to be given and if you check out articles like Baldur's Gate II or Planescape: Torment you will see that there are large amounts of information which would clearly indicate it is more like a guide. However... I think the content of those articles is invaluable despite it being like a guide because it gives an insight into the games and an explaination of the features you will find. Still... where you draw this line I am not 100% definate about. Enigmatical 22:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of view, etc. 

message: WP:MOSDATE; note: using [200x in video gaming] BREAKS date functionality where day/month/year are being used. User DATE preferences will not work properly. Schmiteye 03:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date functionality is broken 

message: The screenshot should be removed. It barely qualifies as a screenshot, since it's impossible to see what it is, beyond being a tiny black rectangle with some heterogeneous blobs in it. --76.224.105.9 21:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ever heard of contrast? How about resolution? 

message: This article need works to amount to anything encyclopaedic. For example, the reception section's reference is a mere user-opinion on a game-site; see WP:SPS. It needs to be removed and replaced with a reliable source, etc... --Jack Merridew 06:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean-up needed
Talk:Gennadius Scholarius

message: "About 100 to 120 of his alleged writings exist, the majority in manuscript and of doubtful authenticity."
How could they be other than in manuscript, since the printing press was unknown in Greek-speaking areas at the time?--CJGB (Chris) 22:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That means no one had made printed editions of them yet, at least in 1908 or 1911 or whenever the Catholic Encyclopedia or Britannica wrote that. Adam Bishop 03:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The Thesaurus Linguae Graecae now has 86 works under his name, so I'm changing the wording here. Opoudjis 08:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Writings

message: "This is called variously Gennadius's Dialogue (didalexis)"
This passage appears to come from the Catholic Encyclopedia. Shouldn't it be dialexis? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.171.184.3 (talk) 17:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writings (second period) 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Patriarch Gennadios I of Constantinople which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 18:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The titles for some of the latter sections, "Pro-Uniate" and "Anti-Uniate", seem to me anachronistic. "Uniate" did not really become a term or an issue until the late 1500s with the Union of Brest. Perhaps "Pro-Union" and "Anti-Union" would be more accurate for this period?Horatio325 (talk) 19:48, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I support "Pro-Union" and "Anti-Union". A ntv (talk) 07:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniate/Union 

message: His "greek" surname is actually albanian. Maybe he was working for the Turks from the beginning after all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.6.239.92 (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albanian origin 
Talk:Tropical Malady

message: On what is this article basing its claim that this movie is two tales, and not one tale? Does anyone know? Luminifer (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Two tales

message: I removed the reference to "homosexual men" because there is nothing in the film which warrants this.  All we see is a close, somewhat "romantic" friendship such as is quite common in non-Western cultures and in certain pre-modern Western ones.  There's nothing at all in the film to indicate that either of the two characters identifies as gay, or will not eventually marry a woman.  This is particularly so with regard to the character of Tong, who is less forthcoming in his affection. Impossible finding a user name (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "homosexual men"
Talk:Christie Brinkley

message: Hey, Meters, I'm perfectly in step with you on the removal of "best" in "best known", but do you have a reason for separating this material into two paragraphs? 76.106.149.108 (talk) 21:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No. In fact, I think I also combined those paragraphs in my earlier compromise edit. Meters (talk) 21:16, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bastille Day 2012 Editing 

message: This article from Hamptons magazine would be a useful source. There was some media coverage, since Sailor and Jack were on the cover along with Christie, but I'm not sure if that needs to be in the article. 
http://hamptons-magazine.com/personalities/articles/christie-brinkley-speaks-out-on-elephant-and-rhino-poaching
Amethyst1234 (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamptons Magazine 

message: WP:PRIVACY doesn't apply to names of adult children or to children's names released to the media by the parents themselves or their representatives. It is standard biographical practice to state children's names. Non-notable children are not named in infobox, however.--2604:2000:1382:C5DD:790D:79E2:EBE5:5AB8 (talk) 17:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Children's names

message: The article says Brinkley was on the cover of the SI Swimsuit issues in 1979, 80, and 81, which is true.  But at 63 yo, she was also on the cover of the swimsuit issue with her two daughters in 2017. Don't you think you should mention that somewhere? 96.241.16.150 (talk) 20:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swimsuit Issues