lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alhamdulillah

message: Shouldn't this be moved to Wiktionary? Or even deleted? Jwrosenzweig 22:58, 19 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's fine here, since alhamdulillah is more than just an expression. Basawala 01:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Am I the only one that thinks "Health benefits of saying Alhamdulillah" is a terrible name for a link on Wikipedia? Yes, the article it leads to has this as a headline - but it seems so unscientific to me (making it sound as if it were scientifically true, instead of a religious belief). Is there a way to add a disclaimer or something? --Rautermann (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to call that link 

message: It would improve the entry a great deal to add the grammatical reason for the appearance of the definite article. --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definite article 

message: In a recent essay, Haroon Moghul mentions a colloquial usage of Alhamdulillah, which he implies is universal in Muslim countries. The precise quotation is, "I did the Muslim equivalent of throwing my hands in the air. "Alhamdulillah," I said — Arabic for, Praise the Lord." (Whole essay here: http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/09/26/553712758/an-encounter-at-a-passport-checkpoint-offers-respite-from-depressions-grip.) If accurate, this context should be added to the article. I won't do it myself, because I don't speak Arabic and some who know more about this might not agree that this is as common as Haroon suggests. Laodah 23:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, colloquially alhamdulillah can be used as an answer to "How are you?" or "How's the family?", meaning little more than "Fine, thanks." Maybe someone can cite a beginners' Arabic textook as a source. (My Arabic class used the teacher's own matzerials.) Wegesrand (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colloquial use 

message: im asaiment wok 37.111.166.187 (talk) 18:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: aslamu alikum 37.111.166.187 (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aslamu alikum
Talk:Cyril of Jerusalem

message: What is the Schaff-Herzog Encyc of Religion from where the initial text was coming from, and can it be used in Wikipedia? (http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/ seems to be the right link.) Colin Marquardt 23:18, 19 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it can be used.  It is public domain.  Pastordavid 17:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Does anyone have suggestion where to find primary or secondary sources for Cyril of Jerusalem?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsilvahist325 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Article appears to be mostly cut and paste from Schaff-Herzog.  (1) There is much more great info out there about Cyril, and this article should take advantage of it; (2) This article needs in-text citations; (3) it needs re-written to be more than a cut-and-paste job.  Rated "High" importance because he is a doctor of the church, and one of the most notable occupants of the ancient see of Jerusalem.  Pastordavid 17:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review
Talk:Giulia de' Medici

message: Her father was bi-racial himself. That would make her bi-racial not "possibly" bi-racial.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.232.41 (talk) 00:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly Bi-racial 

message: I resurrected (undeleted) this page after deleting it - it was not quite the page that the author asked to be delted on the Votes for deletion - I'm having serious wikipedia access problems at the moment, which explains why the wrong page got deleted. Thanks for the patience Tompagenet 00:50, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: sometimes i hate wikipedia, this article was really good...why was it deleted?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.69.59 (talk) 03:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

text: No problem; I probably should have used the "&redirect=no" URL version of the pointer to the typo page when I listed it. Noel 01:49, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article lead says "an ancestor of many of today's European royal houses" while the body says "an ancestor of most Italian noble houses and of the Habsburg and Bonaparte royal lines": these are not the same (two is not "many").  More seriously, the assertion about the Habsburg and Bonaparte royal lines is sourced to "Langdon (2006), p. 196" and does not appear on that page of that book: indeed, according to Google Books, the word Bonaparte does not occur anywhere in that book.  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 21:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, no. The book referenced mentioned a birth record found for a baby named Giulia Romola who had an unknown father. Based on other records and the date, she said the baby who was baptized was probably Giulia. There is no doubt at all who the father of Giulia was since she was raised in the de Medici household as the daughter of her deceased father. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 17:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descendants
Talk:Diabetes

message: The redirect Diabeetus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Sincerely, --AugustusAudax (talk|contribs) P.S: Aliens exist 00:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Diabeetus]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Yl10506 (talk) 21:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 201 - Thu
Talk:Kunisada

message: Following  Wikipedia policy on article names (which says "What .. would the average user of the Wikipedia put into the search engine?") we have been listing Japanese woodblock prints artists under the names they are commonly known by in the West - which means we do not use their complete names (which are rarely used in the West, and for artists of this era change over time anyway). Please see Talk:Sharaku for an extended discussion on this topic. Please leave them where they are. Thank you. Noel 20:29, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Autogynephilia

message: ::Sceptre's opposition is duly noted; however, the ArbCom decided otherwise in its  Sexology decision.  So, if Sceptre would like to appeal that decision, ArbCom is where to go.  Barring that, uncivil comments and disruptions of otherwise productive (multiple) editors would likely be deemed a violation of the discretionary sanctions to which this page remains subject.
::— James Cantor (talk) 23:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't get to claim you don't have a COI when you admit to one. You're pushing the limits of your personal pledge. Sceptre (talk) 10:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have anything to say about the page?— James Cantor (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes  Sceptre (talk) 17:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reported the above to WP:AN/I: — James Cantor (talk) 17:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

text: Thanks, Kevin; that should be fine.— James Cantor (talk) 19:44, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Drama

message: I have restored the content of this page, and two people said I should first seek discussion here.  As noted higher up on this page, there has already been such discussion, and no one opposed re-instating the content.  So, how much more discussion/agreement is enough, exactly?StarLightBright (talk) 23:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh? Per above, editors (me included) opposed the article being recreated. there was some objection to re-creating the article. I didn't see a need for creation back then and still don't, and issues with re-creating the article were cited. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

text: I would also disagree with your statement that there was no opposition to recreating the article.  What can be said without doubt is that there was no consensus to recreate it in 2015, and so it wasn't recreated.  Most of the points made then, for and against, are as true today and the discussion could certainly be continued.  This is best done by tagging this page to give the widest possible visibility before performing the split.  Of course, it is always possible to be bold but probably best to keep that option for cases where disagreement hasn't already been demonstrated so it isn't just seen as a red flag asking for a revert.  Lithopsian (talk) 19:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANOTHER suggestion to restore page. 

message: For anyone interested, there is an RfC about restoring this page, at
:Talk:Blanchard%27s_transsexualism_typology#Request_for_Comment_on_material_in_Autogynephilia_vs_Blanchard's_transsexualism_typology_vs_Transsexualism.
— James Cantor (talk) 17:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC that would restore this page
Talk:Sharaku

message: In the Biography section there is reference to the "daimyo of Awa"; there are several meanings that could be used for Awa in this context and I'm wondering if a knowledgeable person could disambiguate this term in this article.  Thanks. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Awa is probably Awa Province (Tokushima), where Hachisuka controlled.--Mochi (talk) 17:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation request: "Awa" 

message: Current illustration of Sharaku`s famous portrait of Ishikawa Ebizo IV as Takemura Sadanoshin, kindly provided by user Tournachon (a photographer, i. e. artist himself, a good one) is unfortionatly not original print by Sharaku from May 1794, and not even a faithtfull copy. Therefore, it should be replaced with better illustration, sooner or later. Ante Vranković (talk) 23:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ishikawa Ebizo IV as Takemura Sadanoshin
Talk:Utamaro

message: Do you think Kenji Mizoguchis 1946 film Utamaro and His Five Women should be mentioned? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 23:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Utamaro and His Five Women

message: I'm reading a Japanese book about the Edo period (面白いほどよくわかる江戸時代) where it states that the picture for which he was sentenced was thought to have been satirising the then Shogun, Ienari, and this is why he was sentenced. In this current article it says he was sentenced for insulting Hideyoshi. In the current Japanese Wiki article, it gives both reasons. I don't have an English source though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsm77 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for Utamaro's sentence 
Talk:Tasmanian devil

message: No convinced that the Tasmanian Devil is the only Dasyurus that can thermoregulate. Can someone site a study? Venajean (talk) 18:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thermoregulation 

message: The constructed language Palawa Kani (circa 1992) is a government project to divide "approved" from "non-approved" Tasmanian natives and its usage is considered highly offensive by non-pawala natives. Translations, if they are to be added, will use historically accurate language from the area please. A conlang is not acceptable. 124.169.150.3 (talk) 13:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am removing the divisive conlang translation of the name. 

message: Someone should add something about it. 38.52.40.55 (talk) 15:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Where's the source for your claim? Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

text: This is probably referring to the fact that the Australian Football League has just announced the creation of a new club in the league, the first from the state of Tasmania, to be known as the Tasmania Devils. Our IP editor is perhaps suggesting that this article contain a mention of this. I believe it would be appropriate to add something about this to the already extensive In popular culture sub-section. HiLo48 (talk) 23:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFL Team 

message: Greetings,
Has there been any known cases of cross-species transmission of the DFTD in animals that survive devil bites or even humans who have bitten handling the critters? 
Also, the article mentions an immunotherapy treatment begun in 2017 - injecting those poor Tasmanian devils with live cancer cells to stimulate an immune response. Did it work in a large scale? Are other treatments being tried?
Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 17:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross-species transmission of DFTD? Treatment? 

message: From the infobox:
: Distribution of the Tasmanian devil on Tasmania in grey
All I can see on the picture is a lot of black and some blueish lines. Is the black supposed to be very very dark grey? --91.5.107.77 (talk) 11:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Utagawa Toyokuni

message: Following  Wikipedia policy on article names (which says "What .. would the average user of the Wikipedia put into the search engine?") we have been listing Japanese woodblock prints artists under the names they are commonly known by in the West - which means we do not use their complete names (which are rarely used in the West, and for artists of this era change over time anyway). Please see Talk:Sharaku for an extended discussion on this topic. Please leave them where they are. Thank you. Noel 20:33, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gijón

message: Would seem to be an important section that is missing ... quota
:Yes, that would be nice. There is a bunch of information at :es:Gijón, the Spanish version of the page; perhaps somebody could translate it here? Rigadoun  (talk) 16:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Lets start with a backbone structure and fill it in, once we have something half decent, we pass it to main article and continue from there. Here is work in progress -- Figarema 14:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any chance of some history of the town?
Talk:Tondemo-bon

message: Does this article exist for any other purpose than to humiliate Japanese about the jindai-moji?  jindai-moji haven't seriously been considered in public discourse since WW2 and yet this was the best the author could think of as an example of tondemo? -- Tlotoxl 09:26, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the topic of jindai-moji from the article Hangul to the "quarantine" page because it was undoubtedly out of place. But I thought that moving it somewhere else was slightly more beneficial for Wikipedia than deleting it without trace. --Nanshu 00:33, 21 Aug 2003 (UTC)

text: What I wrote was replaced by Tlotoxl. Now I deleted the link to this article from Hangul. --Nanshu 01:38, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)

text: Thanks.  Although I disagree with you on the East Sea/Sea of Japan issue (but that's my own non-NPOV :)  ) and some other small issues, I can see that you have contributed a lot informative and useful articles to Wikipedia.  Keep up the good work, but I'll be watching your Korea edits! ;) ... BTW, I added a couple of companies (Meitetsu, Nagoya & Tokyo Subways, Toyohashi Tramway) to your Railways in Japan page.  --Sewing 14:47, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: "By coincidence, "Tondemo" (pronounced /ˈtoːn.ˌdeː.mo/) means "demonstration of sound" in German." ~ I'm sorry, but I just don't see the coincidence there.  Does "demonstration of sound" have anything to do with the meaning of "Tondemo" discussed in the article?  Because if not, then there's no coincidence there.  I don't think that just the fact that the word exists in another language is even worthy of mention, unless there is some coincidence of definition. Branfish 18:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i do not think this ist relevant to this article. (the 2 words have meaning that are similar at least as far as i can tell from the german word, the japanese may have a second meaning that is not jet in the article) ps: me=german 194.76.29.2 13:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coincidence 

message: WHAT IS THIS PAGE?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.207.34 (talk) 08:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF
Talk:Boolean ring

message: Boolean rings are in an important intermediate position between rings and lattices. The modern standard notation for lattices, ∧∨, minimises confusion and is used in this article. However, the traditional notation .+ is still used in many places, especially digital engineering. People who are used to this notation have a hard time reading articles in the modern notation. Here they have the additional problem that the notation with which they are familiar is used for the ring structure. I would guess that this makes the article essentially incomprehensible for them.
Since ring multiplication and Boolean algebra conjunction coincide here, they are not really such a big problem. Therefore I thought it best to write only addition in a new notation. I think this minimises the confusion for everybody. The particular choice of symbol for addition was easy, since ⊕, the obvious candidate, is already in use as a standard symbol for exclusive or; which is exactly what we have here.
The main disadvantage is that we also need the symbol \ominus, which does not yet display reliably in all browsers, so it will typically be served as a picture. --Hans Adler (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This new use of ⊕ is a  bad idea. There are already  3 different and incompatible systems of notation for Boolean rings/algebras, and inventing a 4th is not going to help the confusion. Wikipedia should record and explain the notations that are used and not invent its own new notation; see Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms. Moreover the symbol  ⊕ is already used in commutative algebra for something quite different. R.e.b. (talk) 16:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of notation 

message: the diagram produces confusion, since it represents disjunction, not ring addition, which is the difference to a boolean algebra. i propose replacing it by a venn diagram for xy and x + y. a third diagram could be 1+x =  ¬ x. or is it not usual to draw venn diagrams for boolean rings? --141.30.71.247 (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: i moved the existing diagram to the boolean algebras section, as a preliminary solution. --141.30.71.247 (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  venn diagram 

message: According to 
N. Dershowitz and J.-P. Jouannaud, Rewrite Systems, in: Jan van Leeuwen (ed.), Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Vol.B Formal Models and Semantics, Elsevier, 1990, p.282,
unification is decidible in boolean rings.
Reportedly, an algorithm to solve every system of equations w.r.t. a boolean ring is given in 
A. Boudet, J.P. Jouannaud, M. Schmidt-Schauss, Unification of Boolean Rings and Abelian Groups, Journal of Symbolic Computation, Vol.8, p.449-477, 1989.
This should be noted somewhere in the article.
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unification decidible
Talk:End-of-life product

message: Microsoft may be a prominent example of setting EOL dates, but doesn't 'notorious' imply that seting EOL dates is a bad thing?  If a business is expected to support its products indefinitely, that incurs continuous expense with diminishing returns, thus raising expenses in other areas.  This is bad both for the business and the consumers, to whom the expense of perpetual support almost certainly falls.  --Mattmcc 21:35, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: True. Why is Microsoft treated here? They do nothing out of the ordinary and it does not clarify the subject. Andries (talk) 10:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessarily derogatory? 

message: : Product support is a different phase of engineering life cycle - that's a maintenance phase, not EOL. I think the article needs to point out that there is a cost for every phase of life-cycle, with EOL cost needing to be planned. --71.245.164.83 (talk) 01:49, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product support - out of context
Talk:4 Privet Drive, Little Whinging, Surrey

message: Perhaps this information should be placed on the Dursleys article instead, and make this page a redirection page. Kaijan 14:24, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. neatnate 10:18, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: Second the motion. I'm not even entirely sure there's anything worth putting on the Dursleys page, aside from the first sentence. The rest of the article is simply a condensed summary of what's happened at Privet Drive, not anything specifically about the location itself. Hermione1980 00:23, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dick Cheney

message: Liz Cheney is no longer the member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Wyoming's at-large district as of January 3, 2023
Please change:
"Liz, congresswoman from Wyoming since 2017, is married to Philip J. Perry, a former General Counsel of the Department of Homeland Security."
To:
"Liz, former congresswoman from Wyoming, is married to Philip J. Perry, a former General Counsel of the Department of Homeland Security."
Or:
"Liz is married to Philip J. Perry, a former General Counsel of the Department of Homeland Security." Brandeman (talk) 03:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Kornatice (talk) 03:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2023 

message: In other articles. I think there is a clear consensus that titles like governor, vice president, president, etc. should not be capitalised when used in prose.
For example, Bush's article reads that he served as the "43rd president of the United States". Can we stick to this consensus for this article please 219.89.38.16 (talk) 08:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation of titles 

message: Mention should be made of his decision as sec defense to cancel further F22 production and destroy the production of the tooling so no further fighters or spare parts could be produced 75.72.161.233 (talk) 15:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancellation of F22 program and destruction of mfg tooling 

message: Dick Cheney, as well as 9 other members of George W. Bush's cabinet, including Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Romsfeld belonging to PNAC. JRSS96 (talk) 09:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership in Project for a New American Century 

message: I am unaware if this has been discussed before, but why is there a need to make a reference to the birth of Liz Cheney in reference to the extension of the draft requirements? It seems like a slightly biased jab at Cheney, and is almost certainly unrelated, either completely or mostly. I can appreciate the humor, but I feel like it should be avoided of mentioning this fact unless Cheney or his wife comes out and acknowledges this. Electabro (talk) 02:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of birth of daughter reference
Talk:Switch (sexuality)

message: This article has been merged. See Top and bottom in sex and BDSM (talk) Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 05:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Undone. --Nemissimo 12:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

message: There isn't a ton of information on any of these pages, so for the time being a merge might be wise?
There oughta be a source of info better than this on these topics on wikipedia.
ALSO: I think there must be published articles etcetera of the viewpoint that tops, bottoms, butches and bitches are terms that don't apply so easily to everyone as is represented on televison and popular culture.  That viewpoint should be referenced somewhere? 66.41.66.213 22:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 05:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  top, bottom, seme, etcetera
Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy/redirects

message: *Asassineted, Asassineted, Asassinated, Asassinated, Assassinated  - all redirects to List of assassinated persons.  I suggest that all but the correct spelling be deleted immediately. Btw, I'm not sure I found all the variants. --Zero 11:11, 19 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Asassineted