Talk:WildFly

message: The article needs clarification about JBoss EAP. Pmerson (talk) 17:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  JBoss EAP 

message: please fix 78.55.208.222 (talk) 14:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a new link and some more information to find the book online Johannes Hillert (talk) 00:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 2 dead

message: Would it not be better to redirect to the JBoss (company) article? 217.119.226.226 12:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to JBoss company? 

message: Just out of curiosity (and the fact that my company is considering using JBoss), who else uses JBoss?
Continental Airlines
Lockheed Martin
Deloitte & Touche
--User:Lindsayt930
Answer: look at http://www.jboss.org/customers/index --62.159.225.138 08:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who uses JBoss? 

message: So what does it do again? What would people use it for? --Witchinghour 14:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree. i'm not any clevier after reading this. I'll add the 'techincal' tag, hoping anyone con fix this. --Foma84 (talk) 08:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

text: You can't possibly understand this page without knowing what an application server is. If you deem that page "useless" then the problem is not here. --M4gnum0n (talk) 10:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are now two versions that should be addressed:  The Enterprise Application Platform and the (present) Application Server.  This is similar to the Fedora, RHEL split that RH likes to do. Reboot (talk) 16:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What's JBoss

message: The sentence "Jboss AS 5.1 contains a preview of some elements from the not yet released Java EE 6 specification." is outdated as the Java EE 6 specification is already released. --212.202.228.154 (talk) 10:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 

message: The part about product features makes little sense. It's summing up a number of (outdated) Java EE specifications, that JBoss AS supports by definition. I think this list should be removed and replaced by a reference to the Java EE list of specifications (the Java EE history article contains a good overview), and then a description of what differentiates JBoss AS from other similar offerings (http://www.jboss.org/as7.html would be a good source, but it's a primary source).
Arjant (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Also, it looks like some of the product features spilled down into the "Licensing and pricing" section.Trumpetpunk42 (talk) 16:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that too. The article as it is right now is a big mess :( Arjant (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 11:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product features makes little sense 

message: Not only Red Hat provides support for JBoss but other reputed companies too.  A list of these support providers will be very helpful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davisambrose (talk • contribs) 17:19, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  JBoss Support 

message: The change to the page name from "JBoss" to "Wildfly" should have been disallowed by other wikipedians. The existence, functionality, and release history of JBoss are facts that did not change when a particular company chose to call future releases by a different name. They are functionally distinct and neither should be a redirect to the other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.43.43.48 (talk) 20:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Request a name change back if you think it can be supported. Donama (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name change from JBoss to WildFly 

message: This does not appear to be a notable product by WP:NCORP standards. As an alternative to deletion a redirect seems appropriate. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Red Hat is a company
WildFly is a software component: a java Application Server, now named Thorntail. The old name was JBoss AS.
Also the redirect from the page JBoss_Application_Server is not correct: it redirects to Red Hat too.
It seems more redirects have as target Red Hat. Red Hat is a company, not a piece of software. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefano.campanini (talk • contribs) 10:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, WildFly Swarm was named Thorntail, that is somewhat different from the full WildFly AS. I never used it, but judging from this description of WildFly Swarm it seemed to be some early form of MicroProfile that was used to ship a very small AS with your Java application. Thorntails death was announced on July 23, 2020. Johannes Hillert (talk) 01:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Red Hat is misleading