lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:AMR 33

message: I've started to slowly add information from Vauvillier's new book. As that work is not only crammed with pictures and drawings but with facts also, it will take some time before I have sorted it all out. As expected, much of what previously had been written about this type, proves to be wrong. Luckily for me this will not at all be a tedious task as the pages are a pleasure simply to look at :o).--MWAK 17:27, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Interrogatives in Esperanto

message: Not a lot of info here that isn't in the main article, and whoever wrote it didn't even bother to use standard orthography. We could split off every little bit of grammar into its own article, but I don't see the point. Any objections to merging? kwami 17:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Esperanto Grammar article is quite big already, and the question-words (kiu, kio, kia,...) are not in there. I came here today specifically to look for these words, and I was glad I didnt have to hunt through a huge article. To "split off every little bit of grammar" is certainly not something I would endorse, but I feel that some major topics could benefit from an article of their own. --BjKa 08:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, they are (under 'questions'). But I'll leave this here. kwami 09:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: The article doesn't touch on how to ask questions of the form "Is it this or that?".  Does Esperanto not have these, or has nobody who's ever asked one in Esperanto found this article? -- Smjg (talk) 18:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be periphrastic, depend on the context, and perhaps the wording in one's native language. You could say "cxu tio, cxu tio?", "cxu estas tiu, au tiu cxi?", etc. I don't think there's a set expression. kwami (talk) 06:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about multi-choice questions?
Talk:Sales lead

message: it would be helpful to discuss also typical lead status and ratings (such as hot/warm/cold). (maybe with hints what is used by the mayor CRM software solutions).
:It would be even more useful if we were actually given a definition of the term 'lead' (which is what I was actually looking up). At the moment the article looks like a block of text copied straight from the middle of a chapter from some university business course book. We could do with a bit of formatting here, and maybe an introduction! 1812ahill (talk) 19:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

message: Lead generation is a thin ad listing so can painlessly be replaced with a redirect to this article. Hcobb (talk) 19:18, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead with the merge because this page was completely barren. —Asgardiator Iä! Iä! 21:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Lead generation here
Talk:Rockman Strategy

message: This article has a history of editors adding copyrighted content from the external site http://www.themechanicalmaniacs.com/articles/RMSLG.php - usually in a cut-and-paste fashion. Such edits will be purged from the edit history. The contents on that page are marked "Copyright © 2000-2006 to Gauntlet" and is not compatible with the GFDL.
This is a reminder that when one edits Wikipedia, content introduced must not violate any copyright, and must be compatible with the GFDL. --HappyCamper 17:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright concerns
Talk:Mother Brook

message: This article needs to be annotated with references to support the facts, which I intend to do.  Also might of interesting to add section on the conflict between mill owners on Mother Brook and those along the Charles River, over the flow diverted from Charles to Mother Brook.  (Done 8/19/2006  Davidb0229 22:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I do not think the change to the link to the Mass. DCR is correct.  The safety of the dams on Mother Brook is only one aspect of the DCR's repsonsibility.  Since they operate the facility for flood control, I think the correct office is not the one for dam safety, but for water reosurce management (whose web page indicates their reponsibility  includes flood control).  Link left as is for now.Davidb0229 03:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dams

message: It would be nice to see more information about the mills that were built on Mother Brook. Location, type, years operated, etc. MarkinBoston 17:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mill info 

message: Map Needed
-69.87.199.7 (talk) 14:06, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map needed 

message: I'm researching a building/area on Mother Brook.  I am having trouble finding the locations of the old mills and would love to see some more Mill info (or notes as to where to find them). -kw  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.171.36 (talk) 17:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mill info and locations 

message: I am still chuckling about this article. It's a magnificent account of Dedham at its best! I thought I was reading a combination of The Dedham Transcript and The National Enquirer! I grew up in Dedham, graduated from local schools & universities and now reside permanently in Hong Kong. I felt very much at home reading about Mother Brook, the Privileges, the Mills and the Rescues. Surely we should commend the authors for their detailed accounts; but, honestly, as others have said, this article rambles shamelessly off-subject and tends to reflect the tone of a weekly supermarket hand-out. I was waiting to see when and where Johnny kissed Susie behind the Boston Envelope Company! Enjoyable, certainly. Wikipedia, probably not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.92.8.189 (talk) 02:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dramatic Ice-Breaking Helicopter Rescues, Etc
Talk:Greater sooty owl

message: Removed Gretater Sooty Owl from other owls section to eliminate black link per wikipedia style. This article is Greater Sooty Owl.--Dakota ~  ° 17:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some cleanup. Removed ramdom owls list and found and replaced cats that were removed.--Dakota ~  ° 20:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The picture of the Sooty Owl at Caversham Wildlife Park has been misidentified. They actually hold Lesser Sooty Owl, and that picture is clearly a Lesser Sooty rather than a Greater. Jubblubs (talk) 20:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Picture! 
Talk:Ottawa ankle rules

message: Why were these rules called the Ottawa rules? Anything to do with Ottawa, Ontario? --Someones life 00:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. See the edits to the article. :) Nephron 03:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, thanks. --Someones life 03:54, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Ottawa? 

message: The History section currently starts with the sentence "The Ottawa ankle rules were developed by a team at the department of emergency medicine in Ottawa, Canada." Which department of emergency medicine does this refer to - the one at the University of Ottawa, the one at the Ottawa Hospital, the one at the Public Health Agency of Canada, or somewhere else? 76.10.158.32 (talk) 23:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which department of emergency medicine? 

message: I had it in my head that over 55 years you would do x-ray anyway. Is this in the rules, or an addon from somewhere else? 219.89.193.223 (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Age?

message: The section "Ottawa ankle rules" includes in the second paragraph some "foot rules", without making clear (enough) if these are distinct from the ankle rules, and when what applies. Any clarification should take care that the applicability of the qualifications (pregnancy, children) in the last paragraph of the section is also clearly specified; it may be that this paragraph should be in a separate section. 198.184.231.254 (talk) 11:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinction between foot and ankle rules
Talk:Homer's Ithaca

message: Judging from the earliest contributions to this page by Kessler, I gather that this "Homer's Ithaca" article was an offshoot of the Odysseus Unbound article, which was originally named Paliki, Homer's Ithaca. But it became a general article which tried to mention all theories.
Now Nealmcb has put Paliki in the lead, which I reverted,
but Nealmcb re-inserted. The effect, as I read it, is to make it seem that the Paliki theory deserves more attention than others.
I oppose having the Paliki theory in the lead, although adding cites supporting it -- deeper in the article -- is of course okay. It would be good to know other opinions so we can see if Nealmcb has consensus. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:50, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for summarizing, . I think the lede should focus on reflecting citable third-party opinions. Reverting the edit seems inappropriate, since it would leave the currently un-referenced notion in the lede that "modern Ithaca is generally accepted to be Homer's island by most scholars". Given statements in multiple independent sources that support the Paliki theory, some strongly, it does seem to me to belong in the lede, unless we can find so many other worthy third-party sources that it would pale in comparison. When I look for that, I instead find yet another independent source supporting Paliki: "In the face of nearly overwhelming evidence that present-day Ithaki is not ancient Ithaca, and increasingly convincing evidence that Peliki may indeed have been the seat of Odysseus' homeland, Papadopoulos and Kontorli-Papadopoulou's recently proclaimed discovery of "Odysseus' palace" on Ithaki seems to be a last attempt to preserve an outdated theory that perhaps instead should be laid to rest." . And I wonder if the paragraph in the lede on Schliemann has much support given the newer alternatives. I don't see many recent arguments to the contrary, but I of course may be missing something. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 18:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Christina Haywood, G.L. Huxley, Barbara Graziosi, etc., and William Murray, think the claims are bad. Francesca Crema's doctoral thesis is in Italian but one can make out that the dispute is ongoing. Citing an article whose main author is John Underhill doesn't add neutral-third-party kind of proof that there is much academic support.  I believe you are wrong but since you are insistent I will not revert again. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

text: Interesting! Thanks again, Peter. Good point about the Underhill reference. Adding some of those other sources to either this page or the Unbound page also seem helpful, and anything more recent also. After all, archaeological research has been ongoing by many teams on many fronts, certainly including in the Paliki area. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Put Paliki in the lead?
Talk:Crisis (British comics)

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at WP:RM#How to request a page move did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for your time! -- tariqabjotu 22:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what happened but the name seems fine. The only tweak might be sending it to Crisis (comics) which would be inline with Comics project naming policies. (Emperor 22:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: If anyone is going to do the two Garth Ennis titles then this, while focused on Preacher, has a few quotes about both which could be dropped in (this is also a note for me when those entries are started). (Emperor 22:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ennis' titles

message: The article mentions Igor Goldkind as editor, but he's not in the list of editors. -- Beardo (talk) 05:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have the relevant issues but if he isn't listed in the credits then it'd be best to snip it out, move it here and ask for sources. (Emperor (talk) 14:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editors
Talk:Tommy Stewart

message: I have removed this statement: "Now he is back with Godsmack."  As of February 28, 2006, Shannon Larkin is still the drummer in Godsmack.
--BillyRamirez 17:53, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Before joining Halloween Stewart played in several bands which he also mentions in the Drum Magazine interview, but with very little information found from those times I had to choose the year that is verifiable. Any better information would be much appreciated. --Sk4170 (talk) 13:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years active (infobox)
Talk:East Granby, Connecticut

message: For more than a week all edits have been vandalism and reverts. Unfortunately a few of those reverts left over some of the vandalism. I have reverted the article to the state it had from Februrary 2nd to March 1st. Kasperd 22:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots of vandalism
Talk:Travis Claridge

message: Why would this possibly be merged with Chris Penn? --MrCalifornia 18:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know.  I am removing it. Manufracture 18:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone should put that
:It says in the article that the cause of death was a fatal shooting, but news reports stated that the cause of death was undetermined. Maybe you guys know something we don't? FamousBobby 02:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did he die?
Talk:Representation theory of the Galilean group

message: Could someone who knows how please typeset the mathematical symbols consistently?
81.131.43.209 (talk) 19:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typesetting 

message: I doubt it can be meaningful to present the two metrics of the article as <<dual>>. The fact that they belong to spaces in duality does not mean they are themselves <<in duality>>.--94.245.127.15 (talk) 08:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dual metric
Talk:Masahiko Nishimura

message: What's wrong with it? Is there a mistake? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nekohakase (talk • contribs) .
:Fix up the POV masterial by inserting only facts and not your own opinions. I have cleaned it up some for you. (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 19:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sean Phillips

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:CS, WP:NOR, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 14:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations
Talk:Mykonos restaurant assassinations

message: "This led to a diplomatic crisis between the governments of Iran and of several European countries, which lasted until November 1997." Is there a reference for this date? It seems quite specific yet I can't find any info. Bigger digger (talk) 10:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date Reference? 
Talk:Fiorina 'Fury' 161

message: How does one pronounce Fiorina? - .:. Jigsy .:. (talk) 16:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounciation
Talk:Jennifer Rhodes

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 01:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: In response to, "object to deletion; bad faith or unreasonable nomination. Actress with three-decade career and scores of significant roles. Nominator, do your research!"...
Don't take things so personally.  I'm not saying the subject is undeserving of an article, I'm saying the current article doesn't have any information that is not already available in the Penelope Halliwell article.  Please expand the article or make it a redirect to Penelope Halliwell. I changed  to a . — ApolloCreed (comment) (talk) 18:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs help
Talk:Mesopotamian marriage law

message: I realize this is rough, but I think it should prove valuable as a foundation.  Elijahmeeks 18:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a note, this comes from an old undergraduate paper of mine, one that I cannot locate a bibliography for.  The information is valid, but I won't have the time or resources to reference it.  If anyone is taking Dr. Claussen's course on the Ancient Near East at the University of San Francisco, then they should be able to find the material to reference this. Elijahmeeks 06:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Pyrometric device

message: Hello,
There is a confusing line in the History section concerning Josiah Wedgwood's contribution. it reads:
In 1782, Josiah Wedgwood created accurately scaled pyrometric device, with details published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London in 1782 (Vol. LXXII, part 2).
'''
Should that read devices or an accurately-scaled pyrometric device or the first accurately-scaled pyrometric device? It might seem to be trivial, but all three of these different wordings imply different possible interpretations of JW's contribution. I suspect it's simply a typo, but the discussion below between andy and steph makes me loathe to just jump in and make the change myself.
Nzelnick (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

message: I have reinserted the recently added section. I can not understand any reason for its removal, including:
*Bullers rings are globally recognised standard pyrometric device.
*There is only one company that producers them: Taylor Tunnicliff.
*Bullers rings have been mentioned in this article for sometime: I have just added some more, relevant information.
*The information I have added is referenced.
*Information on another type of pyrometric device and a manufacturer, Orton, is included.
*The information about Bullers rings is no more commercial than that for Orton.
*The information about Orton is unreferenced.
*Should the information about Bullers rings be deemed unacceptable than that about Orton must also be, and so that also has to be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.54.238.178 (talk) 03:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullers Rings
Portal talk:Portugal/geography

message: *We need to clean many Portuguese disambigs, for instance the Azores and Madeira are passed in EN wikipedia as Portuguese dependencies or worse independente states! this is umbelievable! An example: Santana. There are many articles like this one in EN. I don't know if that was ignorance or someone's motivation. --Pedro 22:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation pages

message: I’ve finished the infobox for the cities that aren’t head of municipality Template:Infobox_city_pt, please take a look and give your feedback. João Correia 19:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  City Template
Talk:Deer farm

message: Shouldn't this article be called "Deer Ranching"? I think it should.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.211.201.229 (talk) 21:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deer Ranching

message: Deer is not a species, it is a family, and elk, moose, and reindeer are all species of deer. So the second sentence:Similar species such as elk, moose and even reindeer may be farmed in this method as well, sometimes on the same land should be merged with the first sentence, but it may be changed back.202.123.130.53 (talk) 11:58, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar Species? 
Talk:Dov Frohman

message: anyone?
I am a co-author with Dov Frohman of a forthcoming book and have composed a detailed biography.  I'm planning to upload it in the next day or so but will no doubt need some help as I have never done this before.  I also have a photo (actually numerous photos) that could be added to the text.  Rash21954 (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of birth? 

message: I have loaded my detailed biography of Dov Frohman.  Feedback welcome.  Rash21954 (talk) 17:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback welcome 

message: On October 1, 2008, someone edited the sentence "His parents died in the Holocaust."  They included the word "supposedly" between "parents" and "died."  As the original author of this entry, I have undone this change because Dr. Frohman knows for a fact that his father was killed at Auschwitz and most evidence indicates that his mother was taken there as well (see his description in his book Leadership the Hard Way).  What's more, the word "supposedly" has a prejorative connotation, indicating suspicion of the claim and verges, frankly, on Holocaust denial.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rash21954 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Wikipedia's policy biographical information must be sourced - from secondary sources the alternative is removal of unsourced facts. Accordingly it will be commented out until a WP:RS reliable source for this info is provided. BO | Talk 15:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change undone
Talk:Critique of Practical Reason

message: I think that these "collaborations" should stick to one artilce at most. Maybe one section, now that I think of it...--Lacatosias 13:14, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umm....yes indeed. That's what I thought. 

message: It is an excruciatingly BORING book, but someone has to do it. The postulates of reason... oh shit, Immanuel brother. Can't find a solution, it's all in the noumenal baby!!--Lacatosias 16:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What dull minds find boring, sharp minds interesting. Robert Brown looked into a boring drop of water and observed interesting Brownian motion.Lestrade 23:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boring!!! 

message: This article is flat out inaccurate on fundemental matters.  In Kant's view - as expressed in this work - Freedom is revealed by the moral law, not God, for one thing.  Who wrote this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.91.153 (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   Incredibly Inaccurate 

message: Almost the entire article is copied from SparkNotes, a website that specializes in book summaries. On it every major work of fiction, science or philosophy is summarized in a simple and comprehensible manner, for students to understand it and use it for their classes.
In short, someone copied the article from SparkNotes. ---Max(talk) 13:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is copied from Spark Notes. 

message: The Preface and Introduction section states, "He suggests that many of the defects that reviewers have found in his arguments are in fact only in their brains, which are too lazy to grasp his ethical system as a whole". This makes Kant sound a bit too arrogant!
While he does comment about grasping the parts and the whole of his critical system, I don't think he usually makes any comments that are as arrogant and snobby in the actual text.
The rest of the article's original summary of the 2nd critique is okay. However, I would like to later add more content and accuracy to the summary (with proper citations). The main issue is that I don't know who wrote that original summary. I'd at least like to ask for valid permission from somebody to edit more than I already have of the text summary to make sure I don't make unwanted changes to the summary author's current work.
This is an often overlooked text and I think it would be very beneficial for Kant students to have a more detailed summary of the 2nd Critique since there are very few good summaries and explanations of the book.MaxMontague4725 (talk) 16:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote the original summary of the text?