Talk:Monel

message: Is Monel advisable for steam application?
:I don't think it is worth the expense.  Steel can be used.  But I don't really know.TCO (Reviews needed) 20:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: old question

message: "One L was dropped, because family names were not allowed as trademarks at that time."
Why did nobody tell Henry Ford this ?  And Mr Chevrolet and Mr Buick and the Dodge brothers ?Eregli bob (talk) 10:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh really 

message: This alloy gets 7000 views per month.  But we have such slim content and referencing is not to good overviews.  :-(  TCO (Reviews needed) 20:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Another surprisingly high view page

message: Established: R405 is a free machining grade. 
What is not stated: Typically free machining grades with additions of Sulfur or Selenium do not weld well. These elemental additions to an alloys base composition, for chip breaking purposes during machining, is a hindrance to the practice of welding. In materials that weld well these elements are normally kept to very low levels such as 0.05% max by weight.HPAlloys (talk) 17:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  R405 information to add 

message: Perhaps the answer is in all the tech-talk? Why not knives etc? At Rockwell 65, it invites the question...in plain English. I understand that Rockwell 62 is considered very hard for knives (very expensive high wear steels S30V, M4, M390, S90V, S110V etc), and I think Rockwell 57 is typical for standard folding and bushcraft knives, including good ol' 1095 high carbon steel. (Normal cheap stainless is often considered too soft to hold an edge.) --2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:6591:4FC6:3374:5763 (talk) 21:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not tools? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Monel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706203621/http://srac.ca/journal/pdfs/2007-02-lr.pdf to http://srac.ca/journal/pdfs/2007-02-lr.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140812224310/http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5110 to http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5110
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Half the entries in the "Other" section of uses are single sentences with no source. Specifically, the sections on kitchen sinks, boilers, eyeglasses, stirrups, fridges, and staples seem entirely pointless to include. I don't want to delete a large swathe of the article but these need to be sourced and expanded on or deleted for lack of notability. 66.161.207.235 (talk) 18:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other section lacks notability 

message: I've deleted the strange sentence that has split the third paragraph of the introduction into two pieces since April 14th, 2013. There is no mention of the term "puritan alloy" in scholarly literature and its wider use is confined to marketing materials for this specific formulation of the alloy, Monel 400. These marketing materials were the sentence's only citations. In any case, recent analyses of the Sudbury Basin have shown that the impactor was likely a comet. This means that the nickel mined at Sudbury is not meteoritic, and was instead churned up from the interior of the planet during the impact.  Georgelazenby (talk) 01:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monel 400 factoid