lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peugeot 305

message: the infos about peugeot 305 are uncorrect, Since the car had many more engines and the range is wrong. It was engineered in order to replace the 404, infact its maquette was presented to public with name of 405
Pininfarina's homepage does not mention a thing about Peugeot 305 beeing a Pininfarina design. -- Piisamson 19:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I used to know someone with a 5-gear version, badged as 305 S5. I believe it had a 1.6 engine. The article makes no mention of either. 78.86.18.55 (talk) 00:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 Gear version 

message: The series one was also available with a 1548cc diesel engine which had engine code XID
This was an all alloy engine with steel wet liners.
It had a four speed transmission in the sump.
I used to own one and I still have the factory maintenance manuals for it. Dieselnutjob (talk) 13:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  XID diesel engine 
Category talk:Microsoft

message: There is a cross-wiki discussion in progress as to whether c: should be enabled globally as an interwiki prefix for links to the Wikimedia Commons. If the proposal gains consensus this will require the deletion or renaming of several pages on the English WIkipedia whose titles begin with "C:", including one or more redirects to this page. Please take a moment to participate in the discussion.
There is also a related discussion on the English Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 February 16#C:ATT to which you are invited to contribute.
Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 15:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comments: <code>c:</code> link prefix for Wikimedia Commons
Talk:Ibanez JEM

message: This page is written terribly.  It is also very difficult to follow.
for example: "Originally, Steve had not gotten the guitars, so the thought was, "What is the point to sell 'Steve's guitar' if Steve does not play the guitar?"
The diction couldn't be further from an encyclopedia article.
:Agreed. Although, some parts are fine, there's just other parts that are difficult to read, like the sentence you pointed out. I can't even decipher what that sentence is meant to mean. If I knew, i could change it so it makes more sense. I can only guess that he/she meant to say that the guitars weren't previously given to Steve, yet it didn't make sense to sell a guitar that Steve designed but doesn't play. That's the only thing I can gather from it.
:Halen061088 15:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Difficult reading

message: i removed the clean up tag, as i think the writing is passable now. Bridies (talk) 02:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed clean up tag 

message: This video (youtu.be/Vtpze0qzvgY) should be whitelisted for the benefit of this page. Deepmac (talk) 18:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 years of the Ibanez JEM: Steve Vai explains how a Legend was Born (YouTube video) 

message: There doesn't seem to be much information on the JEM Jr, other than one reference to the JEM 333 and another to the 555. The 555 is separate to the Jr (does not have the same inlay and has ceased production) and the 333 was only available in Asian markets I believe. The current Jr is based on the 333 but essentially a new model. I'm wondering if we can expand on this? Garrettendi (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  JEM Jr
Talk:Dolyatra

message: This article was once tagged for speedy deletion, and I tend to agree with that sentiment. It supplies minimal information. Having experienced both Holi and Dolyatra, I am of the opinion that there is no difference between the two, apart from the name. Dolyatra is an important name, as it relates to the movement of the Sun ("dol" means "swing", "yatra" means "journey"). I think a small section in the Holi article, talking about this astronomical importance of the time of year, should suffice. Any thoughts? — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 11:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, and given the time since the last comment, I'm going to merge the articles myself. hateless 03:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Foster School of Business

message: Author has been notified of copyvio (twice) --Bookgrrl 11:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: copyvio has been corrected. --Bookgrrl 18:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Northrop BQM-74 Chukar

message: How is this thing RECOVERABLE if it is an aerial target drone? Only if they miss it, or how? Might be nice if somebody who knows elaborates within the article. Max robitzsch 11:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Designation-systems.net indicates that is has a parachute that is remote controlled. The defender would use a special missile to shoot at a recoverable target, one with a telemetry warhead instead of explosives. The defense missile telemetry unit radios data back to a ground unit that records that data for later analysis. The drone would become unusable only if the parachute failed, a ground unit was unable to find it after it landed (ie. sunk before recovered, they float too) or if the defense missile hit the target directly. Aerial defense missile use various types of warheads such as the Continuous-rod warhead or blast-fragment warhead and do not require a direct hit to kill the target. --Dual Freq 14:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recoverable?

message: Added history content as a part of the rewrite to History of unmanned aerial vehicles. See talk page there for details. Akradecki 16:52, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: In spite of that the article is well assembled and has foot general references, a great part of the content lack citations and is not covered by the references at the foot. Tags were removed without really reviewing the article following the author's claim that he was harassed. I will handle this edition to other editors to avoid the ungrounded claims of harassment Vanished user 16:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of citations 

message: http://www.navaldrones.com/BQM-74E-Chukar-III.html#hits
Worth noting? Hcobb (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In Chancellorsvilles article, if a better source can be found. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS CHANCELLORSVILLE accident
Talk:St. Paul, Alberta

message: I heard that there is an enclosed mall in this city. It had Reitmans, Sobeys, SAAN, Gold Brick, Ardene, Mark’s Work Wearhouse, Extreme (clothing), and Guardian (drug store) just to name a few.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.199.9.27 (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Shopping Mall
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philately/Archive 2

message: Although it is an article and not a category, I want to make my first real contribution by redirecting the UK stamps article to one about GB and creating from that the regional articles mentioned earlier.  I'll make a start now and report progress from time to time.  --AlbertMW 06:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Britain Stamps & Postal History 

message: In a similar vein to the previous discussion, I've started trying to move postage sections out of main country articles and into new postal stubs but I'm not now sure if it's a good idea.  I think we should after all use sections if the issuing entity is something like a former colony or province; and create a new article if the country is still issuing, but with cross-references.  There might be an exception re a major former issuer, of course.
I've added a lot of material to List of postal services abroad which is in the countries category.  Nearly all redlinks for now but these articles will be about countries that are using stamps produced by foreign issuers, either through post offices or because of military occupation, but not by a colonial powers.  I think these should be independent articles as they are not about one country.  --BlackJack | talk page 08:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Postage Articles or Postage Sections? 

message: I have been trying to perform a gap analysis of this to get some much-needed structure into it and it has turned out to be in a worse state than I thought. I have managed to find no less than 36 other articles that had been allowed to go astray and I've added them all back into the category. They are all country articles that were started off as philately articles and have been redirected even though many of them still have philately as the main component. "Somewhat of a mess", I think the phrase is! --BlackJack | talk page 12:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philately by Country Category
Talk:HMAS Hobart (D63)

message: According to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq69-2.htm, Hobart's pennant was I63.  Should this article be renamed accoringly (i.e. HMAS Hobart (I63))?--J Clear 02:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hobart and her Australian sisters carried both I and D pennant numbers during their careers. As the D number roughly corresponds with their WW II service, this is the pennant used for the disambiguator. -- saberwyn 04:01, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I63 

message: "the torpedo at one edge of the fan impacted against Hobart instead" 
Could you mean "at one edge of the fantail"? As much as I know about navies, I have never heard of the "fan" of a torpedo. On the other hand, some torpedoes were/are propelled by steam turbines, and others were propelled by small piston engines. Could the "fan" be the "turbine"? Also, during WW II, both the Americans and the Germans had torpedoes propelled by electric storage batteries and electric motors. These had the advantage of making no bubbles and little noise. Still, steam torpedoes were a lot more common in the fleets of the Americans, British, Japanese, Germans, Australians, Dutch, Italians, and Canadians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.215.180.7 (talk • contribs) 06:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The article seems correct to me. Unless I'm mistaken the term "fan" here seems to be referring to the pattern of a spread of torpedoes that were fired, the outer one of which struck Hobart. Anotherclown (talk) 10:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable
Talk:A History of Vodka

message: Hmmm... could someone explain whether any state questioned the Russian rights to produce Russian vodka? You know, perhaps it's just me, but the phrase Only Russian vodka is Russian vodka sounds awkward, something like only real water is real water. //Halibutt 11:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: See Who Really Invented Vodka? (Documentary | Part 1) -- œ™ 05:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Great documentary that could possible used as a reference here, or somewhere
Talk:Lewis Grassic Gibbon

message: It is not correct to suggest that A Scots Quair was unrecognised as a major work during Mitchell's lifetime. The majority of critics across the country (and the London press especially) were very positive about Sunset Song in particular. The only dissenting voices, ironically, came from the local press in Aberdeenshire and Kincardineshire. This from Mitchell's biography by Iain S. Munro.--Stevouk 22:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recognition During Lifetime

message: The book "Gay Hunter" was published under the author's real name of J. Leslie Mitchell, see for example here. I have not checked any of the other books - he published different books under different names - but it may be that this article needs moving accordingly. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Same goes for his first book Hanno: or the Future of Exploration] and the last in his lifetime, Nine Against the Unknown. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 13:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using the wrong name?
Talk:Ludmila of Bohemia

message: The article needs *MUCH* work, as it's completely inaccurate and contradicting our other articles. I'll try to work at it, but unfortunately I won't have time for next week or two. So I've put the  tag to warn the readers. --- Sandius 12:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I withdraw the warning on the article since it has been disputed and left "unimproved" for a year. --Diligent 10:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:Peace and Progress

message: I have never heard this phrase as a Imperial motto, and as a state motto. Is there any references?--Mochi 12:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I really dont know much about it... i had seen it there for a year when it was suddenly removed, so i thought i'd revert it and make the article too. If you have any info about it plz let me know, or fix it yourself.WoodElf 16:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Control Risks

message: This article is blatant advertsising.
I Agree  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.6.52 (talk) 22:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article ("Adventures in the Ransom Trade") originally printed in Vanity Fair in 1998 has a little info --Lord of the Ping (talk) 05:54, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks a lot like advertising still.Jimjamjak (talk) 16:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Advert
Talk:Middle of the road (music)

message: why not a link or reference to the pop group from the 70s called "Middle of the Road" .
"Ultimately this is a style of music which is indeed broad and can appeal to everyone." 
I understand the sentiment, but this sort of music makes me gag: I trust a few others feel
the same way.  I'm not sure how to restate that remark though.  Measure for Measure 20:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:De Grassi Street

message: The Street Now
https://maps.google.com/maps?q=degrassi+queen+street+east&safe=off&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&ei=MI9tUejtPIO70QWU54HICw&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.168.180.149 (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alphonse de Lamartine

message: The article currently asserts (sans citation) that Lamartine died in poverty. However, page 258 of Wilfrid Thorley's "A Bouquet from France" states that "two years before his death... the empire granted him a capital sum which relieved further anxiety." I'll soon be updating the article accordingly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.219.79.141 (talk) 01:00, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Fiscal Status at Death

message: What is the revelence of his opinions about mohammad?
or what makes his opinions about the russian tzar less important?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.214.102.99 (talk) 10:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: On Muhammad
Talk:Bay Parkway (Jones Beach)

message: I boldly removed reference route marker that is at the top of the infobox and I was reverted some time later, per WP:BRD, we are to discuss this change.  I removed it because it is not representative of the route the same way that a touring route marker is.  It is an esoteric maintenance marker and nothing more. –Fredddie™ 23:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I didn't install it, but it seems to be the closest resemblance to a touring route marker that we have. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  01:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not exactly a ringing endorsement for keeping it. –Fredddie™ 04:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's the only marker the route has, and everybody else seemed to be okay with it. I'd suggest contacting TwinsMetsFan over this, but he quit Wikipedia a while back. It'd be cool if that road had it's own marker, but it would have to be something more unique, because the Bethpage State Parkway has the "B" Long Island Parkway shield. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  06:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference marker
Talk:New York State Route 109

message: I'd expect some history. I believe this is one of the oldest roads in the area.-Jmabel | Talk 22:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a feeling there's a lot more history to this that what we see here, especially considering the apparent connection to Old Farmingdale Road, Little East Neck and Great East Neck Roads. Plus you've got the name Fulton Street, which is also partially shared by New York State Route 24 (Fulton Avenue) in Hempstead. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

text: https://www.rooseveltufsd.org/domain/113 indicates that it was already a hard-surfaced road in 1900. - Jmabel | Talk 04:12, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

text: https://libguides.freeportlibrary.info/c.php?g=435576&p=3738861 makes mention of the Babylon Turnpike in an item about 1833! - Jmabel | Talk 04:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but Freeport has their own Babylon Turnpike, though, and it's located at Exits M7E and M7W/ It's not the same road as NY 109. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  22:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, and the Roosevelt one is the same as the Freeport one. Interesting. So maybe the one this article is about is not so old. Probably should have some mention of the potential confusion of names, then. There's a redirect here from Babylon Turnpike, and it was indeed the Freeport/Roosevelt one I was interested in. - Jmabel | Talk 04:33, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History?
Talk:HMAS Ipswich (J186)

message: Perhaps this is easy to get and edit in, but in the event I find it difficult I think people may want to know where 'Morotai' and 'Hang Tuah' come from.173.15.152.77 (talk) 22:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of second and third names? 
Talk:Karl Bryullov

message: Under the heading "Characteristics of art", the second sentence states "In the forefront of the historical picture, but its main theme - not the struggle of heroes, as in classicism, and the fate of the huge human masses." This is more than a little confusingly written. It is lacking an essential verb (and possibly more than that), but that verb is impossible for me to deduce from the context. Can anyone help rewrite this so it will make sense? Bricology (talk) 23:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence needs rewrite
Talk:A42 road (England)

message: The A42 terminates at a roundabout with the A453.
It is separated from the A50 by the A453 to J24 of the M1.
The terminus is joined by the northbound exit of the M1 at J23A.
Ths is not accurately reflected in the chart of the article and so I have changed it again - if it helps I can take a photo of this terminus and add it to the article as this part of the road is often confused by people.
Robdav69 19:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately you have now removed the northbound exit to the M1 which is why I put it back before.  See .  I have restored this again. Regan123 20:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A42 Terminus

message: Please note you can access the M1 south at the roundabout of J23a of the M42.
I am editing the article again.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Robdav69 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have amended the table.  Maps show access off the terminal roundabout north of the northbound exist for the M1.  The A42 does not terminate at M1 J23A. but at roundabout with A453.  See . Thanks,  Regan123 00:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: J23a of the M42 has a SOUTHBOUND entry onto the M1

message: I drive on this junction every day and have done for the past five years. It has FIVE roads coming  off it.  Working clockwise in order they are: a non-numbered slip road to Donington Park services, the A453 south to the airport, the A453 north to Junction 24 of the M1, an exit offering southbound access ONLY to the A42 and M1, and a no entry terminus coming from the A42 and M1 north.  Junction 24 at the end of the A453 offers south and north access to the M1 and not just south as a previous edit of this article had indicated. Robdav69 July 30 2006.
:The point of my mentioning the J24 southbound access to the M1 is that you cannot do this from 23a. I didn't feel it was particularly relevant to list the other routes from the A453/M1 J24 roundabout (M1 north, A50, A453 and A6) since they are neither part of, nor relevant to the A42. jimfbleak 15:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections to roundabout at junction 23a

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have moved the termini junctions for this article into the terminus junctions area. Thank you. Roads4117 (talk) 09:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major junctions
Talk:Blacksmith (character)

message: Missing photo Defknightsoul (talk) 03:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Big Sir (character)

message: Note: Big Sir was not killed in the storyline involving the flesh-eating ants in Suicide Squad v. 2. He was killed in the first issue along with most of the former Justice League Antarctica. Sadly I do not have the comic available, but it involved recovering a captured scientist from his biological creation. I will remove the flesh-eating ant part.
:Thanks, but I fixed the problem. Lots42 11:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: Didn't Big Sir beat up barry allen so badly that he needed plastic surgery, which permanently altered his appearance?  If someone knows if this is true and the details involved, it should be mentioned in the story, as it would be the most significant thing the character has done.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.189.7 (talk) 22:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Barry Allen?

message: I'm a big fan of Big Sir and in many of his appereances he doesn't look, in regards to his face, anything like this. Lots42 (talk) 02:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Fiddler (comics)

message: "Royal Tenenboners quadaplegic"?
:Vandalism. I've removed it. Daibhid C 15:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Golden Glider

message: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=112496  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.85.167.18 (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peyton List To Play 'Lisa Snart', a.k.a. 'The Golden Glider' In THE FLASH
Talk:Magenta (DC Comics)

message: Does anyone watching this page have a source for her name?  The reason I ask is because in Flash v2 #2, it is Francine "Francis" Kane.  This differs from what is currently used in the article.--Rockfang (talk) 04:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her name
Talk:Ellie Nash

message: Due to the fact that the Season 7 speculation is admittedly speculation, It shall be deleted. Wikipedia needs to stick to verifiable facts.
--Amaraiel 04:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation 

message: This character is NOT notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The show that the character appears in does nothing to establish notability. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?