lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vipera berus bosniensis

message: the synonyms were reviewed in this paper:
Krecsák, L. (2007). An account of the generic and specific names, and type specimens of viperid taxa described by Albert Franz Theodor Reuss (Squamata: Viperidae). Zootaxa 1514: 1-36.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.92.87.108 (talk) 09:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One has only to study the synonymy of this species to know that Reuss was an idiot, or at the very least a very controversial figure in his time. Therefore, the article above should make an interesting read... if only it were freely available. If there's one think I've come to dislike almost as much as the commercial software industry, it's the commercial academic publishing industry. --Jwinius (talk) 11:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krecsák, L. (2007)
Talk:The Clash/Influences

message: There's no call to mention flash-in-the-pan bands like Blink-182 and Green Day  in the opening paragraph is there? That's a bit like mentioning Martin Amis (or <insert
whoever>) in the opening paragraph of an article about Dickens or Shakespeare. Relegate
this to the bottom of the page please. And as for REM, U2, and the Cure - in what 
conceivable way are they "influenced" by The Clash???? One might as well put that the
Rolling Stones were "influenced" by Scott Joplin. I'm not giving my opinion of these
groups, merely questioning what relevance such wildly unClash-like groups as U2, REM and 
Cure have to a Clash article. Again, relegate the namedropping to the bottom, if it 
must be mentioned at all. 
Hey bud, not a bad comment, but I have to disagree withn you.  Yes, REM and U2 sound nothing like that The Clash, I can assure they influenced by The Clash, The Clash influenced every body that came to music right after that and was considered "alternative"; and both REM and U2 cite the Clash as an influence. Hell, I saw Black 47 play on the street at an Irish festival in NYC, they covered I Fought The Law, Clash-style.  I went to go talk to the lead-singer about it, they love and greatly admire the Clash as well, do they even remotely have a hint to that in their sound? As for the flash-in-the-pan bands, oh please, even given them a mention in the article would be sarcilege.
:There actually are a number of sources that show The Clash's influence on U2's music. I'll quote two of them from atu2.com:
:"The Clash were the absolute greatest band for us. They were the inspiration." from http://www.atu2.com/news/article.src?ID=3532&Key=&Year=&Cat=5 and "The Clash was the greatest rock band. They wrote the rule book for U2." from http://www.atu2.com/news/tdih/search.src?TYEAR=2002&Key=&TYPE=&Start=774 Pattrick 19:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influenced by ... 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... sourced or not, it appears to be a solid discussion re the article. We do not AFIAK, arbitrarily delete talk discussions. --Wwwhatsup (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion Comment
Talk:The Divine Image

message: It makes no sense to have the poem described not on the page, but the experience poem not described given in full. andycjp (talk) 02:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

message: I propose merging The Divine Image into Songs of Innocence and of Experience. The poem doesn't seem more notable than any of the other 400+ in the collection, and I think the non-personal-reflection content of this page could easily be incorporated into that one. Moriwen (talk) 18:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 16:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Vipera dinniki

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:BennyTrapp Vipera dinniki.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 9, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-03-09. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:BennyTrapp Vipera dinniki.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Queen Mab (poem)

message: Not sure how to 'flag' this, but wanted to note that this article makes many unsupported claims about QM's publishing history. The poem was not printed by Shelley, but by Hookham. All of the uncited, unsupported details of its printing history are questionable. The definitive current source for Shelley's text is the Fraistat (et al) edition, which differs radically. If someone has time it would be great to update this piece and remove the inaccuracies, or at least cite sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C03B:9FD0:4CC:78AE:8879:2DC9 (talk) 18:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Prostitution in Hungary

message: : "The Government of Hungary does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking; however, it is making significant efforts to do so."
The US State Department report says this about all countries with legalized prostitution. Hence, this is merely the *opinion* of the US government. This statement needs to be put in context.
:: I've tried to make this very clear. -- 84.63.194.68 (talk) 15:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV statement on trafficking
Talk:The Scroobious Pip

message: The Scroobious Pip was left unfinished by Lear in 1872, <re></ref> due to this, the piece wasn't published until 1935 in a collectors edition, 950 copies in existence. Harvard University Press published Teapots And Quails which is a small book of Lear's poetry that includes The Scroobious Pip. Ogden Nash, an American Poet, was asked to finish the poem in 1968.<re></ref> Tashiray (talk) 07:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Is My Team Ploughing

message: When was it written and when was it first published?  RJFJR (talk) 15:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

message: are we only quoting Vaughan Williams’ version of the poem on the page and a hint of the omitted material? ELSchissel (talk) 16:26, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why
Talk:Horse length

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 05:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-28 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Should this page be moved? The AfD suggested Length (sport), to also cover, e.g., greyhound and boat racing, but the article would have to be generalized in that case. Length (unit) is inappropriately generic if the article only refers to horse-related measurements, whether in the context of racing or not, since the term is also used for other racing disciplines. Perhaps Length (equestrianism)? Hqb (talk) 21:42, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would be perfectly happy to move the article to horse length (no dab needed); then the opening could say something like, "A horse length, often shortened to just length, is a unit of measurement ....". That OK with you? Hqb (talk) 05:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm.  Let me mull it over a bit.  The problem is if you use a dictionary and look up "length", it does have a definition that includes boat or horse lengths.  (example)  But on the other hand, as long as it is consistent with other measurement article names  (is there one for boat lengths??)  and on the appropriate dab page (should someone look up length) This could be an elegant solution. I guess give it 24 hours from my time stamp, I'll pop a quick note over at WPEQ to see if anyone else has issues.  If neither myself nor anyone else raises a fuss, I can't think of any good objection at the moment.  Montanabw(talk) 18:47, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. If anyone screams, we can resume the discussion. Hqb (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: All but one of the terms are used in official racing results. The expression "slimmest fraction of a nose" isn't, unless you know different. Will remove in a day or two unless it gets referenced.  Tigerboy1966  20:29, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. Montanabw(talk) 05:09, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious
Talk:Tooth loss

message: I don't know if it is an inappropriate image or not, can you please help me?
Thomas (talk) 02:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identify? 

message: That blurred picture scares me. Can there be an uncensored version or an entirely new picture? Thanks. Future WWE Champion, DrewieStewie (talk) 10:39, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than being rather frightening, it is also of little to no help, and someone has to have a better picture that can legally be used. Ptb1999 (talk) 19:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ummm... 

message: Is there something like hysterical tooth loss? Where the teeth fall out after a psychological trauma?
It's what this eye witness claims happened to him after the Nedelin disaster. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1qmDb7dDII?t=35  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cancun (talk • contribs) 19:32, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hysterical tooth loss?
Talk:Prostitution in Romania

message: Source stating most prostitutes in Romania are Roma (Gypsy) women.
https://theguardian.com/society/2014/jan/12/romanian-sex-workers-taxed-street-corners  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.19.75.28 (talk) 03:15, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added [[portal:Prostitution]] and [[portal:Sex work]] because this article is regarding about prostitution. I also added that many sex workers in Romania are of [[Romani people|Romani (Gypsy)]] ethnicity.
Talk:Gray ratsnake

message: It strikes me as inconsistent to use "grey" in the main title but "gray" throughout the article.  I read up on the rules for usage and it seems to be "tasters choice".  Doing a Google search, there 2,180K hits for "gray rat snake" versus 319K for "grey rat snake".  Since this is a southern US subspecies, I would vote to change the title to Gray.  Comments?      Pinethicket (talk) 13:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After-the-fact support. This is a US subspecies, so it should have US spelling. Ucucha 13:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Common name spelling

message: The article of Elaphe obsoleta, black rat snake, says that no subspecies of Elepha obsoleta are currently recognized with reference from ITIS. Should this article be merged with Elepha obsoleta? MKFI (talk) 14:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer recognized as subspecies? 

message: The article states: "the gray ratsnake is less likely to bite than other members of its species". What is this supposed to mean? Since the gray ratsnake IS the species, the sentence appears, to me, to be nonsense. Maybe it should be ""genus" instead of species? --— Dave (Talk) 13:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Something wrong with the word "species" in this context

message: "The venter is usually off-white or pale gray with darker irregular blotches ..." Can I read "belly" for "venter"? No need for such specialised terminology.Mathyeti (talk) 07:51, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of venter 

message: Oko look 174.240.234.65 (talk) 21:15, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lol
Talk:The Psychology of The Simpsons

message: I need now if there is more information about this book. Beacause I think that now isn't good article.Botedance (talk) 07:48, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you could please be more specific, that would be helpful. — Cirt (talk) 18:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that this article isn't a good article. Sorry but I am not native english.Botedance (talk) 09:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, some detailed suggestions for how to further improve the article, would be most appreciated. :) — Cirt (talk) 16:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For example, there isn't information about the background. And I think that this part is very important in the book's articles. Botedance (talk) 20:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry
Talk:Moment (unit)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 06:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-28 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Trivial Pursuit, Genus Edition has a question that asks how long a moment is, and the answer it gives is "a minute and a half"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.213.196.96 (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivial Pursuit 

message: This term is precious enough to expand to a long, long article. Just give it some time. With goodness in mind (talk) 09:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't merge

message: It's interesting that there is an article for this, and that it matches other info I just googled. However, I think modern usage of "moment" can mean anything between something like 5 seconds to 5 minutes. It really seems to mean "I don't know how long this will take and I'll get back to you whenever." Autumn Wind (talk) 15:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: What?

message: The redirect Timely moment has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  J947 † edits 05:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Timely moment]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Time location has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  J947 † edits 06:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Time location]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved to moment (unit).  Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Moment (time) →  – "Moment (time)" is ambiguous with instant. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *(medieval unit) seems more accurate as it set the definition of "moment" at about 90 seconds which, I don't know, is it still the standard? If the descriptor becomes (unit) then it seems to be presenting and choosing 90 seconds as the only base descriptor. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 March 2023
Talk:Itoigawa

message: Is the discovery of the Neolithic jadeite industry why jade is the local stone? We would need referenced info before adding this; right now it's just an idea I had. It would be good to add the reasons for the other symbols, too. Sorry all I can do is suggest this! —Geekdiva (talk) 00:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neolithic jadeite as inspiration for modern symbol?
Talk:Darwin's Dilemma

message: I looked through the documentation for this game and could find no reference to a "Nicholas Schlott". Where did this infromation come from? Mukake (talk) 16:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicholas Schlott 

message: A subheading under Speciation, is also labeled "Darwin's Dilemma". It describes a disturbing conundrum that Darwin himself grappled with, with regard to the fact that creatures are grouped into species. This is something that his Theory of Natural Selection could not explain.
This alternative meaning of "Darwin's Dilemma" should be mentioned here, or a disambiuation page should be created to direct the enquirer to the correct article. I would imagine that the biological speciation problem should take precedence over the game named "Darwin's Dilemma". Oggmus (talk) 06:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative meaning of "Darwin's Dilemma"
Talk:TBC Bank

message: Bold t  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.47.57.108 (talk) 06:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  present state of TBC bank 

message: our group is considering to do business with TBC bank - would this be a solid decision ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.47.57.108 (talk) 06:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  present state of TBC bank 

message: For a article of this size a far greater number of references are needed. If the bank is truly as big as it is claimed then surely there would be news about it all over the internet. Please find them and reference the article properly. Musamir Azad (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insufficient references 

message: This page was identified as including a disambiguation error based on the term "ADB".
In order to resolve this problem I have removed the wikilink from the term as I am unable to determine, from the context, what it is referring to.  If you wish to restore the link please ensure that the term and the link are fully resolved so that no further disambiguation occurs. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 06:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ADB" Disambiguation 
Talk:ONL

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-28 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Obviously not. What if someone sees a name with an honourific tagged on, such as ONL or FRS? Wikipedia needs to disambig or redirect to the relevant meaning. Granted, this is better handled by the Wiktionary, but right now the integration is wanting. I mean, if ONL is deleted, all of the other disambig pages will also be deleted shortly, no? Urhixidur (talk) 22:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?
Talk:5-HT2C receptor

message: Psilocybin mushrooms and LSD are strong activators of 5HT2C.
This is not supported by the main 5-ht receptor article, or even by the list of agonists on this page. Fireemblem555 (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Data 

message: Multiple paragraphs of baseless rambling coupled with hyper-simplified mechanistic reasoning to conclude clinical effects. Not to mention the verbatim internet pharmacologist folklore of "Agomelatine exerts its antidepressant actions via 5HT2C" to which there is more evidence to the contrary than in support. 
I hate to be so snark, but the author(s) of the mechanism of action section knew exactly how baseless their reasoning was when they wrote it. I propose removing this section outright.  Oro Temp (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is ripe with armchair pharmacology
Talk:Prostitution in Costa Rica

message: Formal request has been received to merge: Sex tourism in Costa Rica into Prostitution in Costa Rica; dated: March 2017. Proposer's Rationale: its about the same subject. . Discuss here. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion

message: I have performed the above merger as a full-content paste merger because the new material seems both relevant and complementary. There may now be some opportunity for rationalisation and re-organisation of the article, but it is not obvious to me how to do so. For instance, does the AIDS content belong in the main article or the "Sex tourism" section? If anyone else wishes to help with the post-merger cleanup, please feel free to do so. - Polly Tunnel (talk) 12:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a few changes to clean things up a bit John B123 (talk) 18:34, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-merger cleanup
Talk:Gilles Poisson

message: I found no reliable source for his name being "Berger" - the source most easily found is not RS by any remote standards.  Can someone come up with a DoB or something on him?   Collect (talk) 00:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: I finally found a reliable source : an interview with Gilles by SLAM! Sports : http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Wrestling/2009/05/09/9406661.html
I hope this is enough. --72.0.255.241 (talk) 18:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Name? 
Talk:House of the Surgeon

message: This article would look much better with photos. Sting_au  Talk 06:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moreover that recent studies shows, that the painting (Pompeji Have) based on the ruins of House of the Faun and the mosaic saying: "HAVE". So it was mistakenly called by the painter as the "House of the Chirurgos"... JSoos (talk) 13:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Black Kids

message: Would a section on critical response be appropriate for this article?
The strong early hype and corresponding backlash seems to be a big part of what makes this band notable.
Evidence of each should be easy enough to source. (96.252.41.188 (talk) 16:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical response? 

message: Isn't it?
mÆniac Ask! 19:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you referring to? VillageGreen1215 (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just the fact that the band is named 'Black Kids'. Not trying to damage the article or anything, just discussing the name. mÆniac Ask! 18:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk pages are not a forum for discussing personal opinions. If you have a reliable source discussing reactions to the name, that would be appropriate to discuss. (Also note that two members of the band are black.)--Cúchullain t/c 19:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention, it's unclear what might be construed as racist about their name? It's not "I Hate Black Kids" or something... VillageGreen1215 (talk) 01:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. Just trying to start a discussion.... mÆniac Ask! 22:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Wee Bit Racist 

message: There's a new song on their YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P-cPP_C_c0 198.84.212.173 (talk) 10:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Song on YouTube 