Talk:Kidarites

message: I realise this is a complex area, but the Kidarites article seems to directly contradict other articles in Wikipedia, with each page not mentioning the other's position.
===Huna people===
This article: "The Kidarite (Chinese: Ki-To-Lo) dynasty of the "Ki" clan led the Huna"
Huna people: "... the Hunas conquered Gandhara from the Ki-to-lo (Kidarites) in ca. 475 AD ..."
===Hephthalites===
This article: "At this point Kidarites became known once more as White Huns."
Hephthalite: "It is therefore assumed that White Huns constituted a second Hunnish wave who entered Bactria early in the fifth century AD, and who seem to have driven the Kidarites into Gandhara."
--Rogerb67 (talk) 20:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes,but the name of Iranian Huna is not from "mix of asian hordes" but from old iranian Hva/Hi etc. "himself",derived from this word is Hvon/Hyon "own,owner".The same thing we see in the ethniс name of Germanic tribe Suebes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrkan (talk • contribs) 21:09, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions 

message: This article: "At this point Kidarites became known once more as White Huns."
Hephthalite: "It is therefore assumed that White Huns constituted a second Hunnish wave who entered Bactria early in the fifth century AD, and who seem to have driven the Kidarites into Gandhara."
--Rogerb67 (talk) 20:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes,but the name of Iranian Huna is not from "mix of asian hordes" but from old iranian Hva/Hi etc. "himself",derived from this word is Hvon/Hyon "own,owner".The same thing we see in the ethniс name of Germanic tribe Suebes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrkan (talk • contribs) 21:09, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Hephthalites

message: An image used in this article, File:Kidara.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Kidara.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Excellent article! These pan-Turkist nationalists even insolent to the extreme! I propose to immediately ban all authors attempt to pan-Turkic rights.Article want to spoil dirtied fill every stupid stuff and then urge to delete it. This is the  methods of pan-Turkic provokators. It's from inferiority complex.Their main desire to remake everything and everyone in the Turks.Excellent article. Pan-Turkists want it to arrogate to itself, since they themselves are not able to write anything they are everywhere on Wikipedia so do.They find good article strangers waiting for them when you arrange and point out all the links and authors, then the pressure starts from a take away someone else's article and always write that "they were Turks".Another anything they are not interested  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.172.58.15 (talk) 18:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Excellent article! Stop to Pan-Turkist Deletion!

message: Source [5] is a self-published book written by a guy who is chemical engineer/ Katariya bio  - should be removed from the article. Also there is no evidence that Kidarites originated in Altai Mountains ??? Martin Lee Smith (talk) 21:20, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable sources ?