Talk:Van Nuys

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Moved — JFG talk 15:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Van Nuys, Los Angeles →  – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, WP:COMMONNAME, also WP:USPLACE does not apply because Van Nuys is not a city, but a subdivision of LA. See Talk:Brooklyn#Requested_move_28_September_2016, and Harlem Prisencolin (talk) 04:33, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: And the same goes for the rest of :Category:Neighborhoods in Los Angeles In ictu oculi (talk) 09:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

text: No, that just means that it is a WP:Primary redirect, which is consistent with WP:USPLACE. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

text: There was recently an RM discussion at Talk:Brooklyn on the applicability of WP:USPLACE since the 5 boroughs are listed as an exception, however WP:USPLACE also indicates that :Category:Neighborhoods in Los Angeles follow California consistency. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Van Nuys is not primary because it is also the name of a historic family in Los Angeles County and also the name of a street. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If that was the consensus, the dab page would be Van Nuys, rather than Van Nuys (disambiguation) and Van Nuys would not redirect to the neighborhood. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 20:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 October 2016 

message: I think there's a consensus to move but that's partly because I think both oppose votes give questionable rationales, so relisting.
User:BeenAroundAWhile, you don't say whether you think this is the primary topic as claimed. If so, why should this be an exception to the guideline?
User:In ictu oculi, I don't see the parallel with Brooklyn, rather it seems to follow the guidelines as it's suggested this article should too, can you elaborate? Andrewa (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There was recently an RM discussion at Talk:Brooklyn on the applicability of WP:USPLACE since the 5 boroughs are listed as an exception, however WP:USPLACE also indicates that :Category:Neighborhoods in Los Angeles follow California consistency. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Van Nuys is not primary because it is also the name of a historic family in Los Angeles County and also the name of a street. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If that was the consensus, the dab page would be Van Nuys, rather than Van Nuys (disambiguation) and Van Nuys would not redirect to the neighborhood. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 20:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus.   -- Calidum 00:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Van Nuys →  – The "Neighborhood, Los Angeles" format is followed by pretty much every neighborhood in Los Angeles (with only a few very famous exceptions such as Hollywood). Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 20:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 May 2021