lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:You Don't Know What Love Is

message: IMO the greatest version is by Etta James from Heart of a Woman (1999). Surely this should be listed along with Lady Day and the others.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alf Heben (talk • contribs) 23:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the first comment about Etta James. Her version is one of the best and I've added her name to the list; no problems exist with disambiguation ... she is singing the same song (written by Don Raye and Gene de Paul) that the page is about. Xenxax (talk) 12:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etta James 

message: I don't understand why this article has the NPOV tag; no personal opinions seem to be stated. If no one objects or explains within a reasonable time, will remove the tag. - Xenxax (talk) 13:51, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: thumb|upright|Helena Mattsson sings You Don't Know What Love Is in Wild Side Story, 2003
This article's only image was removed with the summary "not useful" and I wish I could say that was not (not) done by a user with the kind of conflict of interest that comes from personal animosity against the donor and the uploader and the contributor here. A neutral user might want to have look here and see how a photo of the song being done by the most intenationally notable person ever to be in that show could be considered "not useful"? I don't agree, but even though people like Ssilvers have questioned whether or not COI issues regarding me should be extended all the way to an actress I met years ago, I am reluctant to reinstate the image. A neutral look, that's all I ask. I always abide by neutral work. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Serge.  I must agree that Mattsson's performance in Wild Side Story is not significant with respect to "You Don't Know What Love Is". If a cast album starring Mattsson singing the song had won a Grammy, or if she had separately released the song as a top ten single, for instance, it would be significant in this article.  But even then, any image on this article should be of the most important proponents of the song, such as Carol Bruce, Billy Eckstein, Ella Fitzgerald, or someone whose recording topped the charts or became somehow famous. Indeed, most of the recordings listed in the table should not be there, but that is a problem for another day. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you sincerely - I rely on your fair appraisals. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: COI matter?

message: The George Benson version released in 1989 as the #1 track on Tenderly (George Benson album) is a beautiful rendition of the song. Benson expertly captures its poignancy, passion, irony and pathos accompanied by pianist McCoy Tyner and others.Steveshelokhonov 21:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Benson and Tony Bennett versions are important and must be mentioned in the list
Talk:Wymondham railway station

message: The first station on the Dereham line was close to the present Wymondham Abbey site, not at Kimberley.  This would also have been the third station in the town. 2A02:C7D:7E7D:5A00:5DF5:70A2:27F7:7C7F (talk) 10:06, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: An interesting observation - however, although this station did exist (with evidence found on site, and it being marked on a couple of maps iirc), there is very little evidence to enable it to be added to Wikipedia due to the nature of the rules of the site.  At this time, for example, no timetables for services using this platform have been located, and even the name of the station is not known.  Anyone able to find concrete evidence to allow it to be entered onto here (thereby improving the accuracy of the page) would be doing a great service! Neith-Nabu (talk) 11:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: First station on Dereham line
Talk:Needham Market railway station

message: Does anyone have a source stating how far down the GEML this station is from the London Liverpool Street terminus? --TBM10 (talk) 20:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: 77 miles 7 chains. What you need is a book like Quail/Trackmaps. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance down line?
Talk:Diss railway station

message: Does anyone have a source stating how far down the GEML this station is from the London Liverpool Street terminus? --TBM10 (talk) 19:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: 94 miles 79 chains. What you need is a book like Quail/Trackmaps. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --TBM10 (talk) 06:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance down line?
Talk:Stamford railway station

message: Quick note primarily intended for myself but could be of interest to others. I'll be looking into this in more detail when I get chance. Network Rail wish to make alterations to the station to permit larger gauge freight trains to use the line. See http://www.southkesteven.gov.uk/Planning/ApplicationInformation.aspx?ID=S08/LB/7000 and http://www.railwayherald.co.uk/issues/RHUK/Issue139.pdf page 4. Adambro (talk) 22:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alterations for larger trains  

message: I'm very impressed by the route diagrams but have two suggestions:
* Why not make them separate templates like all the others?  Then they could be categorised like the others.
* The pale colours used for connecting routes are normally used for closed lines.  On the top one the ECML and WCML are shown in the pale colour, but clicking the Legend link goes to a page that says they are closed!  On the second one the essendine line is closed & is in the pale colour.  I'd suggest standardising the use of colours.
--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 22:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Route diagrams
Talk:Manea railway station

message: National Express DO Run services to and from Manea
National Express East Anglia Timetable 17  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.6.202.46 (talk) 16:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No - the only trains stopping at Manea are run by other companies, although they are included in the National Express timetable. 86.151.144.174 (talk) 23:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NXEA 

message: 80 miles 18 chains. Why? I am sure there is a reason but it is beyond me. Mtpaley (talk) 22:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: See this Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_Railways/Archive_43#Chains_RFC. It has been debated quite a lot! Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 22:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

text: It's verifiable, so I . --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the crazy units?
Talk:Shippea Hill railway station

message: There is a hill at Shippea Hill, but it's underground. The "hill" is a ridge of firm ground between two areas of fenland.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Librarian16 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

message: We should try to comment on the extraordinary fluctuations in the passenger usage figures. These might be caused by changes in the measurement methodology, by changes to the train timetable, or an external cause such as the use of the station by seasonal agricultural workers. Or the figures may just be wrong. Has anyone checked the cited source, which appears to be a set of spreadsheets with raw numbers? Verbcatcher (talk) 00:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The changes from 2005/6 to 2006/7, and then from 2011/12 to 2012/13, were, to the best of my knowledge, caused by timetable changes.  But without access to archived timetables for the periods in question, putting that in the main article is just begging for a "citation needed" edit. It's possible that archive.org may have preserved them from the relevant TOC websites. I'll have a look later when I've got a bit more spare time. The figures quoted here are correct, at least insofar as they are the same as those in the official data. A significant proportion of those (more than 75%) were season tickets, suggesting that, when the station was served daily, it was used by (presumably) agricultural workers travelling to work from nearby towns. Well, actually, given that it's still a very low number, it might have been just a couple of workers travelling every day! MarkSG (talk) 10:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annual rail passenger usage 

message: has reverted my deletion at the paragraph on an event organised by the Odd Socks, which is said to be a society of the University of Cambridge. My edit summary for deletion was:
* delete Odd Socks paragraph: unsourced and probably not noteworthy as we have no article on this society
Zadradr's edit summary for restoring the paragraph was:
* The event comprised 43% of the passengers in the given year and represents a rare and notable instance of popular appreciation of this station, as a direct function of its status as a former least-used station.
A common rule of thumb is that if a topic is insufficiently notable for a Wikipedia article then any events relating to the topic are unlikely to be sufficiently noteworthy to mention is another article. We have no article on Odd Socks; there have been two attempts to the create this article which were deleted as 'not notable' and as 'spam'. There might be an article under a different title but there is no obvious candidate in :Category:Clubs and societies of the University of Cambridge. A brief Google search uncovered no sources to confirm this event and no sources about the society. The paragraph is still unsourced. Without a source there is a risk that this may have been a hoax, possibly intended to raise the profile of the society. Please add a reliable source. Verbcatcher (talk) 11:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd Socks society
Talk:Stowmarket railway station

message: Does anyone have a source stating how far down the GEML this station is from the London Liverpool Street terminus? --TBM10 (talk) 19:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: 80 miles 46 chains. What you need is a book like Quail/Trackmaps. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance down line?
Talk:J. N. L. Baker

message: The text "in 1964–65, he was Lord Mayor of Oxford, the first university member to hold this post" is rather misleading as the position of Lord Mayor only started in 1962. Baker was only the 3rd Lord Mayor. From 1205 to 1962, the position was just that of Mayor and I believe several university people held that position, including for example in 1959 - 60, Frederick Mason Brewer who was head of the Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory at that time. I am not sure how to deal with this issue. Any ideas? --Bduke  (Discussion) 22:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Lord Mayor
Talk:Corby railway station

message: The article claims that Herten in Germany and Łomża in Poland are both larger than Corby. However, taking the figures presented in the respective Wikipedia articles, the population figures are 72,218 for Corby, 62,779 for Łomża and 61,821 for Herten. This makes Corby the largest of them by some margin. Renerpho (talk) 05:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This might have been true when it was originally written, but, now that Corby again has a station, the sourced comment that it was "one of the largest towns in Europe without a railway station" makes the essential point, so these extra details may as well be deleted. Blurryman (talk) 19:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  City sizes 

message: I feel the article should be re-arranged a bit given the reopening is now "History", and the "Future" consists of the improved services which have already happened, and the East West Rail Northern Route, which didn't happen. However I'm not sure how best to do this, if I simply merged the Reopening into the History header, it would make the history section very long. Thoughts? NemesisAT (talk) 14:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to organise this article 

message: Hope you all dont mind, but I have added a whole new section on electrification GRALISTAIR (talk) 02:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrification etc
Talk:Wellingborough railway station

message: I was watching an old film last night called 'Please turn over' made 1959,featuring many British comedy legends, Ted Ray, Leslie Philips, Joan Sims, Charles Hawtrey etc. There was one scene where Victor Maddern and Julia Lockwood go to a railway station. I am certain this is Wellingborough. Can anyone else confirm this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushden filmbuff (talk • contribs) 10:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the internet move database says Beaconsfield. British film makers in those days often did location shooting close to the studio. Saved money, you see. Afterbrunel (talk) 11:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Horton's guide to Railways on film states the location to be , but the location is very close to Beaconsfield, so the filming reasons by  seem quite sound. Sorry, but IMDB can be quite unreliable. The joy of all things (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film location? 

message: East Midlands trains has 24 class 43 "HST" power cars and 27 Meridian units.  So to say that EMT 'run most of its services using Meridian trains' would be inaccurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.79.208.21 (talk) 09:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two power cars to each HST set, making 12 sets. While there are 27 Meridians, more than double the number of HSTs. The HSTs are clearly less than half of the InterCity fleet and not many call at Wellingborough these days. Likelife (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling stock 
Talk:Amitabha Buddhist Centre

message: Responding to the Wikipedia Community portal, I came to this page and copyedited it for good English, and tried to fix up some of the references into better style. I hope you'll agree it's better now than it was. My only problem left with the page is the references to publications without any publication information, and I was unable to obtain this information. I suspect some of these titles are some of their self-published material, which makes it a poor reference, really, in my opinion. Suggestions for improvement would be to find citations that are not self-published wherever possible, and of course to improve the standard of all the citations. The Wikipedia Reference Generator is invaluable in this. Good luck! Clippership (talk) 22:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrt the mentioned references, only 2 references were used that were based on the centre's in-house publications as some of these activities were not covered in the main stream media or by independent sources during my earlier research. I welcome u or anyone who cld replace them with relevent citations if they cld be found in the near future. Thank u for your excellent copyedits in improving the article further for the benefit of Wikipedia & its readers esp those keen in the development of Tibetan Buddhism in Singapore. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyediting Done
Talk:Kōryū-ji

message: 1) The events in question took place at 法興寺, NOT 蜂岡寺.  Both archaic temple names with the same reading ("Hōkō-ji").  Both completely different temples.  The former is Asuka-dera.  The latter is Kōryū-ji.  Spending just three seconds reading the Japanese Wikipedia article about the incident, or doing a Google search could have confirmed this.
2) It's not really hard to get your head around the fact that information about *the incident* belongs in the article about *the incident*.  Duplicating it all leads to redundancy and inconsistency.  Bueller 007 (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever good which might have attended a discussion here is best held in abeyance pending whatever develops from inquiries at WP:WQA.  In this context, I take some comfort in learning from HelloAnnyong that, at the higher levels of dispute resolution, both users come under scrutiny.  I'm quite confident that my entire editing history can withstand close scrutiny. I can't see how User:Bueller 007 can feel similarly at ease with the prospect of a too-revealing examination. --Tenmei (talk) 22:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: @Bueller: A wiki article and that web address are not considered as reliable as published works. @Temmei: Please recheck your sources to make sure that there is no misunderstanding regarding which temple we're talking about here. - 52 Pickup (deal) 11:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wrongful deletion" ?? 
Talk:The Turkish Einstein, Oktay Sinanoglu

message: This page was a review of this book and also a biography of Oktay Sinanoglu, but he already has a page and Wikipedia is not for book reviews.  So most of this page has been deleted and the 'cleanup' removed.Seth J. Frantzman 21:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Fancy dance

message: The title "Fancy Dance" seems misleading. It implies that this "style" of dance is beyond or better then other "traditional" dances, especially as it follows freestyle in form with all the emphasis in costuming. It also doesn't help with the fact that a Wikipedia article with this title will bias the search engines to regard fancy dance as this. In my honest, humble little opinion, I think it would be better to subdivide the page, and use the longer names of the "dances" for the men's and women's "fancy dance," Native American Fancy Shawl Dance and Native American Fancy Warriors Dance. But that's just my two cents. EDIT: or postfix it for context. like Fancy_Dance(Native_American)Kuriosly (talk) 03:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's what it's called where it's done.  Got some sources for your assertion?  The powwows I've been to recently (admittedly, only one or two a year) seem to still say "Fancy dance"; at least the announcers do.  Up for change if it's sourced, got some sources?? Montanabw(talk) 04:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: I added some material to this page, but in general, I think I see two things going on and maybe this requires a bit of additional input. Fancy Dance, which this page is about, is one of several categories of, as far as I can tell - I'm new to this - competitive Pow Wow dancing. Other categories include grass dance, jingle dance, men's northern and southern traditional dances, women's traditional dance. There are other regional and tribal dances as well.
The big Pow Wows in the Pow Wow circuit are in a big way, formal competitive dance arenas, but this isn't really reflected in the way Native American Dance is set up in wikipedia. I don't know how to beging to help fix that though, or if it needs fixing but maybe others can show me how. Joemann
Joemann 21:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am currently working on a project and did some research on The Fancy Dance. I would like to add more information about the types of dances, what they wear in more detail, and more of how competitive it is. SHAE2019 (talk) 14:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding information about the fancy dance
Talk:Earswick railway station

message: According to http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/e/earswick/index.shtml it was renamed in 1874 to avoid confusion with another station.. But which one? ..Prof.Haddock (talk) 06:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted. Except Butt has a different closure date Chevin (talk) 14:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Renamed

message: The Flag and Whistle was renamed the Hogshead pub in 2018.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.4.94 (talk) 17:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag and Whistle
Talk:Holtby railway station

message: http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/h/holtby/index.shtml gives 11 Sep 1939 for closure, 2 days out from the date given in the article, which I assume is from Butt. 
The same site questions exactly when the station opened, claiming it might have been 1848. Though the full picture is not clear.
Very minor differences in entire scheme. But could be looked at.Prof.Haddock (talk) 07:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Butt says 11 September 1939 as well. There are two conventions for station closure dates: "last day of service" and "first day without service". Butt uses the "first day without service" convention, and I believe that www.disused-stations.org.uk does as well. 11 September 1939 was a Monday, so if we assume that the station had no Sunday service, then 9 September 1939 (as given in the article), which was a Saturday, will be the closure date under the "last day of service" convention. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:16, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ok thanks. I should work out a way to clarify this - maybe saying "closed from" (as opposed to "closed after").Prof.Haddock (talk) 03:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Ski-U-Mah (magazine)

message: The article was originally just about a humor magazine called Ski-U-Mah, I added information about the origin of the cheer.--RLent 21:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  And I just added a picture of an old copy of the magazine. Artemis-Arethusa 00:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I moved the bold text to the first instance of the phrase "Ski-U-Mah". I also deleted the phrase "among other things", since the article now mentions what those other things are.--RLent 21:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:    Knowing all of that is helpful, and i've retrofitted on this talk page a section heading reflecting what has gone before.   Dual-topic articles should not occur; restating the preceding, there was an article on the magazine, by a colleague who perhaps didn't have any interest in the phrase as an expression of school spirit, or perhaps was unaware of the context within which it was named. (Which doesn't matter.) The succeeding additions are probably best explained as aspects of the fallacy that Wikipedia is about words, rather than topics. There are two topics here, and while they are importantly related topics, you are not your fraternal sibling, and these two topics can't be thrown together in the way that a dict would group them, essentially by focusing on the identical wording of their respective shortest identifying phrases.   The remedy is splitting and renaming the two topics, and then reflecting the connections by linking the articles rather than ignoring the fundamental kernel of the original article, its lead: "Ski-U-Mah was the name of the college humor magazine of the University of Minnesota from ca. 1929-1950." The other topic is a slogan, and its article's lead will reflect the distinction between a magazine and a slogan, cheer, or whatever, that has the same wording.--Jerzy•t 01:32, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Dual-topic article)
Talk:Ole Henriksen

message: The article was delete whilst the discussion was going on...
Let me refer to the General criteria for speedy deletion:
"...Note that simply having e.g. a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion."
"...an article that is blatant advertising should have inappropriate content as well."
The article clearly doesn't violate those rules.
TobiasK 20:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
*IMDB
*Amazon
*a new show on Danish TV2
TobiasK 21:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  importance or significance