Talk:Dipangkorn Rasmijoti

message: Please consult Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Thailand-related articles)#Cast votes 217.140.193.123 16:27, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: moving

message: This article represents now a good result of naming Thai royals, and should be used as example to articles on other Thai royals too. Titles and "of Thailand" are not usually needed, thus they can be stripped away. Arrigo 20:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming style 

message: Not sure if this is the right place, but verification that the prince is second in line to the throne was requested. How about: http://www.answers.com/topic/dipangkorn-rasmijoti. 203.214.155.56 11:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answers.com is a Mirror site of Wikipedia so can't be used as a source.dwc lr 15:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification 

message: :Image:Dipangkorn Rasmijoti.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Dipangkorn Rasmijoti.jpg

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nom. Morhange (talk) 03:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: "Aside from the King, both Dipangkorn and his father are the only male members of the Thai Royal Family."
Vajiralongkorn's article says he had four more sons from Mom Sujarinee Mahidol na Ayudhaya:
# HSH Prince Juthawachara Mahidol, born August 29, 1979
# HSH Prince Vacharaeson Mahidol, May 27, 1981
# HSH Prince Chakriwat Mahidol, February 26, 1983
# HSH Prince Vacharawee Mahidol, June 14, 1985
Apart from the secrecy in Thailand, isn't there any information about them? Adam78 (talk) 13:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only son of [[Vajiralongkorn]]? 

message: The now 4-year-old prince still appears as a poster child for breast milk, depicted as thinking: Thai: "นมแม่ ดีที่หนื่งเลย", (For sure, mother's milk is #1). This is un-encyclopedic?
:The current picture for the article is cropped from the one above.--Pawyilee (talk) 18:06, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mothers' milk 

message: The role the young prince has played in advancing the role of breastfeeding in Thailand has been deleted every time I've tried to add it, so whoever is anti-breastfeeding can now turn thumbs down on both his breastfeeding AND his nickname, Phra Ong Tee, as reported in this article April 27, 2006 A chronicle of a Prince The article spells the nickname "Phra Ong Tee," but wikileaks of Eric G. John's cablegrams uses RTGS "Ti." —Pawyilee (talk) 21:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phra Ong Tee/Ti and mother's milk 

message: It's incredibly outdated. --Jack 23:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It would of course be great if we had such a freely licensed photo. I've tagged this page with the reqphoto template. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

text: It's also an out-of-focus image. I'm deleting it. GoodDay (talk) 12:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about a picture of him where he's not 3 years old? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:37, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: As he is first in the line of succession, would he already the defacto Crown Prince, or does he need this title bestowed upon him in the vein of the Prince of Wales title? 203.46.132.214 (talk) 02:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he the Crown Prince?