Talk:Embraer E-Jet family

message: The current main picture shows the smallest and rare E170 (191 delivered), flying right, of launch operator LOT. A left-flying one is preferred. The E175 (531) and E190 (551) are much more widespread and should be more representative. The largest E170/175 operator is Republic (185) followed by SkyWest (107), and for the E190/195 Azul (88) and JetBlue (60), which is also the E190 launch operator. Republic and SkyWest may not be simple to understand as the fly for US Airways/American or United. Here are some left flying ones over a clean sky:
File:LOT Embraer ERJ-170-100LR 170LR Wadman-1.jpg|current LOT E170
N131HQ (6802920313).jpg|E175, Republic (US), front bit side
CLT 10-19-08 N131HQ (2957810602).jpg|E175, Republic (US), clean config
N138SY LAX (24209867591).jpg|E175, SkyWest (United), clean
N109SY LAX (24351948085).jpg|E175, SkyWest (United), side
File:N247JB KJFK (37103752403).jpg|E190, JetBlue, side bit front
File:RDU 12-30-09 N304JB (4239963384).jpg|E190, JetBlue, clean, side
File:N187JB 071315 1 (19810057372).jpg|E190, JetBlue, clean
File:E190 N316JB at DCA.jpg|E190, JetBlue, almost clean, frame filling
File:Azul PR-AZF (cropped).jpg|E190, Azul, frontside
File:Azul PR-AZA decolando.jpg|E190, Azul, frontside, frame filling
I think the "JetBlue, almost clean, frame filling" is fitting, but I'd like some input! cheers.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:No personal attacks. You should consider removing your comment.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 13:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

text: Personal choices. Stay concise, thanks.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 13:46, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main picture 

message: Can we use this image File:N247JB KJFK (37103752403).jpg
As you can only see the underside of the current image. OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 15:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change main iamge 

message: I wanted to ask this question for some time now. Basically, I noticed this little thing about the names of this series' aircraft that's just really weird and confusing.
This article's name, and the name of the aircraft family is "Embraer E-Jet Series" (the "E-" part is important). Then, when talking about a specific variant, "E1[variant]" is used (for example, E170, notice that there is no dash here). Then finally, when talking about the variant, but using the manufacturer's name "Embraer [variant]" is used (for example, Embraer 195, notice the lack of the "E" or a dash).
This is what I find confusing:
Why is it "E170", but it can't be "Embraer E170"? I sometimes change it to "Embraer E1[variant]", but that tends to be reverted / changed back to the version without the "E".
Why is it "Embraer E-Jet series", but not "E-1[variant]"?
In case of any confusion, I'll try to illustrate it simpler without using the "[variant]". On Wikipedia, this is how the names of E-Jet series aircraft usually look like:
Embraer E-Jet series → E175 → Embraer 175
Now, what would make sense to me would be:
Embraer E-Jet series → E175 → Embraer E175
or...
Embraer E-Jet series → E-175 → Embraer E-175
I hope I made myself clear, and I hope someone knows the answer to this. Thanks in advance! EnjoyingMyProblems (talk) 17:22, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Some confusion is caused by the use of marketing names and official names at the same time and some unoffical names based on the ICAO Aircraft Type Designators:
*Embraer ERJ 170-100 is marketed as the Embraer 170
*Embraer ERJ 170-200 is marketed as the Embraer 175
*Embraer ERJ 190-100 is marketed as the Embraer 190 
*Embraer ERJ 190-200 is marketed as the Embraer 195
*Embraer ERJ 190-300 is marketed as the Embraer 190E2
*Embraer ERJ 190-400 is marketed as the Embraer 195E2
The E1XX numbers are just unofficial shorthand based on the ICAO Aircraft type designators (E170, E175, E190, E195, E290, E295) strictly speaking they are all variants of the ERJ 170 so the "E-jet family" has just been made up to encompass them all and made even worse by the sister article being called "Embraer E-Jet E2 family". MilborneOne (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The names of the aircraft 

message: According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KLM_Cityhopper#Current_fleet KLM Cityhopper also operates Embraer E175 and has orders for Embraer E195-E2. 77.241.232.28 (talk) 16:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  KLM Embraer Fleet