lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Twins (1988 film)

message: This says they are fraternal twins, aren’t they actually identical twins?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.204.23.135 (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

message: I started the 1988 article on the movie. Hope you do not mind.boo1210 19:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That was unecessary, this article already has a hatnote pointing to the 1925 film. --Closedmouth (talk) 02:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  boo1210 

message: Please can we revert it to either a redirect to Twin (disambiguation) or its own DAB page – I don't buy that disambig pages must use the disambig parenthetical qualifier. This page disambiguated films called "Twins"; seems perfect to me. --Rogerb67 (talk) 20:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I fixed all the mainspace links to Twins (film) then pointed the link to Twin (disambiguation). --Rogerb67 (talk) 00:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting Twins (film) to this page negates the point of the name change
Talk:Red Heat (1988 film)

message: When both of the main characters are in the bar talking, there is some clarinet music playing in the background.  What is that song called? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.209.7.30 (talk) 18:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: «Я налётчик Беня-хулиган» («I'm a robber Benya-thug»), originating from Odessa criminal circles. Lyrics available. The song is sung a bit wrong in the movie (the singer has accent and several parts of lyrics are deliberately skipped) Dmitry Dzhus (talk) 20:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is that song? 

message: I've tried to merge as much of the trivia section as I could, however a lot of it is unsalvagable as it doesn't have references. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 06:38, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section
Talk:Raw Deal (1986 film)

message: I don't know if this is the right place to ask, but is there an article on the movie with the simular name on wikipedia??84.152.62.166 (talk) 19:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Raw Deal – A Question of Consent]]
Talk:Mouvement de libération nationale du Québec

message: Here is the link to Raymond Villeneuve's editorial:
http://www.mlnq.net/mdupre/mdup041/mdup041.htm
There is a reason why he is called an extremist... 
Nevertheless, reading the full editorial we see that the man is arguing, very badly, against what he calls the "greatest cultural genocide of contemporary times", the one against the francophones of Canada. He is so wrong on so many levels, but he is right on the assimilation of francophones and the failure of Quebec's language policy to bring the majority of linguistic transferts towards French instead of English.
His "us and them" attitude makes him the equal of those he pretends to denounce.
-- Mathieugp 14:31, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link does not lead us to find the quote 

message: Reading the other editorials by Villeneuve, we can see that the quote is not really representative of his overall ideology. I don't think we ought to avoid mentionning his radical views and his intolerance, but to respect the NPOV rule, we ought to mention his other "editorials" against imperialism, colonialism, capitalist globalisation, linguistic and cultural unification etc. -- Mathieugp 14:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, by all means if you know more about Villeneuve's other editorials and ideals, feel free to add to the description. Arasaka 01:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of the MLNQ's ideology is not neutral 

message: What's with all that child pornography nonsense? It seems like vandalism to me. Plus, there are absolutely no reference. Added on Jan 22: I deleted the clearly vandalized parts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pierreboro (talk • contribs) 17:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Child pornography? Seems like vandalism

message: MLNQ flags were flown all over the freedom convoy in Ottawa. I suggest at least mentioning it in the article and reconsidering the status of "defunct".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonSage84 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freedom Convoy
Talk:Stay Hungry

message: Stay Hungry (film) → Stay Hungry – In my opinion the 1976 film is the most prominent entry under this title. I wouldn't mind, however, if Stay Hungry (disambiguation) became the default entry. I just would rather not see that picture of Dee Snider so often by accident —Dystopos 18:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved --Stemonitis 06:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Piranha (1978 film)

message: Since when is this considered a comedy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.25.170 (talk) 03:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Who cares what Hulk Hogan thinks? He is not Roger Ebert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.150.18.209 (talk) 14:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  David J. Hogan has nothing to do with Hulk Hogan. Hint: Hulk Hogan's real name is Terry Gene Bollea. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:12, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comedy

message: Listening to the DVD commentary last night, producer Jon Davison says the budget was exactly $660,000. I believe he said $400,000 was put up by United Artists, $200,000 by Roger Corman (who was originally supposed to put up $400,000 but changed his mind), and $60,000 by a Japanese actress whose name I do not recall.
Any way to cite this direct, audible quote from the producer himself?203.185.242.56 (talk) 15:12, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't be an issue. I'd recommend the reference read along the lines of "Audio Commentary, Piranha DVD". If there's been more than one DVD release, including the year of the release would probably be a good idea as well, along with any other specific identifying information that comes to mind. See Godfellas for an example of an article that uses an audio commentary as a reference. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 15:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  budget
Talk:Howling II: Your Sister Is a Werewolf

message: Seriously, removing that outright stupid trivia bit... It's not like Christopher Lee wasn't an established actor before and after this film.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.145.17 (talk) 11:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The sentence fragment "this film's ret-conning of that film's ending to be a secret" (referring to The Howling and Howling II) is incomprehensible to me. I haven't seen Howling 2, but in an encyclopedia, one shouldn't have to see a film to understand an entry. Can someone put this into halfway-elegant, comprehensible English, please? Bustter (talk) 08:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  retrospective continuity
Talk:Howling III

message: I've deleted most of the plot summary for this movie because I've just watched the movie and the summary is completely the different. The scientist is not a european werewolf and does not reveal himself on TV. Jerboa is revealed as a werewolf on TV after she succumbs to the flashing cameras. I don't know how such completely false information could go uncorrected for so long. 218.215.186.172 (talk) 11:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's nothing compared to what happened to Karen White when she transforms into a werewolf live on national television at the end of The Howling. Can you please tell the difference between the two? Please let me know what you think. Thank you very much. AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 
Talk:Howling IV: The Original Nightmare

message: it just stops abruptly, with plenty of plot left undescribed. maybe the section would be too long with the full plot, but then the whole thing should be edited down, not just something like the 2nd half of the movie just completely undescribed.76.226.220.71 (talk) 21:42, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section is terrible
Talk:Superatom

message: What are  the physical properties of superatoms? At STP, what is their state (are the nobel-gas chemical properties ones solid, liquid, or gas)? Do they behave more like atoms or molecules alone (can Al-14 be disintegrated by reaction with reagent, or is it more stable and requires extreme conditions like plasma to decompose? Polonium 01:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. Sounds like ammonium and oxonium. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 11:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Properties 

message: 超原子是指一些原子团簇，其具有类似单个原子的一些基本性质。
一般人们采用气相凝聚方法获得团簇，其中蒸发、溅射等多种方案可以实现物质的气化，而凝聚则依赖缓冲气体和超声膨胀等方法实现。Na团簇即是在这样的实验中被发现存在一个的2, 8, 20, 40, 58 和 82的幻数序列。此幻数序列不同于惰性气体团簇中常出现的几何序，却更接近于一种电子序，整个团簇类似于一个原子，所有Na原子的自由电子类似于单电子能级一般的自由排布，逐层填满，比如2，8即为填满第一壳层和第二壳层后的总电子数。或者说，超原子中所有原子的自由电子在占据（或排布）一组被整个团簇所共有的电子轨道。这样也就像原子核的势由正电核的形状所决定一样，很容易理解，非球形或有杂质的团簇的幻数（或满壳层原子数）与球形团簇略有不同。相应的从化学上看，遵循这样一种新壳层模式的超原子也就表现相应的性质演变规律。所以，比满壳层多一个电子的超原子就很容易失去一个电子，就像碱金属原子一样（叫做超碱金属），而比满壳层少一个电子的团簇就很容易得到电子，呈现很大的电子亲和势，就像一个卤素原子一样，所以叫做超卤素
目录
•	1 铝团簇 
•	2 其他团簇 
•	3 超原子复合物 
o	3.1 金超原子复合物 
o	3.2 其他超原子复合物 
4 参考 
•	5 参考文献 
•	6 外部链接 
[edit] 铝团簇
一些铝团簇就有超原子性质。这些团簇负离子(Aln– with n = 1,2,3...)在氦气中产生，在含I的气氛下可以发生反应。质谱分析证明，这样的反应会生成Al13I–.[1]然后这样的含13个铝原子还多一个电子的团簇就与O2不再发生反应了。注意，其电子总数刚好为40，是Na原子电子序幻数数列中的一个幻数。（Na原子的幻数序列）意味着这一团簇应该具有类似惰性气体原子的性质，这刚好与实验吻合。计算表明，这一多余的电子处于团簇中的铝簇部分，其指向刚好于碘原子相反。这说明此时本团簇（的非碘部分）呈现比碘更大的电子亲和势，甚至强于溴，因此被命名为超卤素。相关的Al13I2–团簇也预计有类似I3-离子的化学性质。
类似的，拥有42个电子的Al14 团簇，表现出类似碱土金属的+2价化学性质，这就可以理解的Al14I3–行为了。这一阴离子有43个巡游电子，三个I原子各自获得一个电子，从而在凝胶模型框架中就剩余了40个电子。总结如下
•	Al7 = 类Ge原子. 
•	Al13 = 类卤素. 
o	Al13Ix–, where x = 1-13.[5] 
•	Al14 = 类碱土金属. 
o	Al14Ix–, where x = 1-14.[5] 
 [edit] 其他团簇
•	Li(HF)3Li =  (HF)3 内核使得来自Li的两个电子环绕整个分子轨道运动，就像原子核一样.[6] 
•	VSi16F = 有离子键.[7] 
•	13原子Pt团簇有顺磁性
•	 
[edit] 超原子复合物
超原子复合物是由有机配体稳定的包含一个金属核心的一类特殊超原子体系。比如，硫醇包裹金团簇，其电子计数法则为
ne = NvA - M – z
其中，N是核心中的金属原子数，v是原子的价态，M是配合物所需电子数，z为整个复合物的电荷数，ne是需要考虑的全部电子数。[10] 比如，Au102(p-MBA)44 有 58个电子，就是一个类幻数.[11]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Songfengqi (talk • contribs) 01:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  超原子(中文翻译,Chinese translation) 

message: In the text, "...it has been established that the magic numbers are 13, 19, 23, 26, 29, 32, 34, 43, 46, 49, 55, etc." the "etc." seems to suggest this sequence follows a noticeable pattern (like "and so on").  I can't see such a pattern here.  Could this be clarified with the actual pattern, if one exists, or else rephrased if one doesn't, perhaps by mentioning "...lower magic numbers have been determined empirically and higher ones have been determined by computer model.  The first few magic numbers are (list above)"...?  TricksterWolf (talk) 05:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never heard of a sequence, personally. I'll need to check a bit, but I think it's not an easy pattern to deduce here.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pattern? 

message: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-world-superconductors.html 85.178.213.33 (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible discovery of Cooper pairing in aluminium superatoms at 100K
Talk:James E. Faust

message: Alright, since it had been asked for at WP:LDS, I peer reviewed this article - it looked great! However, I did have quite a few questions left: 
#What was his dad's middle name?
#Where was Granite High School?
#When did he graduate from University of Utah?
#What year did he marry his wife?
#When and how long did he serve as Utah state legislator?
#Is there anything else about his family? If not, consider removing it, or merging is skillfully with somewhere else (maybe in article summary?).
By the way, I'm going to be removing this article from the Peer Review list at WP:LDS. Once these things have been addressed, feel free to relist it for peer review if this isn't enough, but ask specifically what you want. --Trevdna 01:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:LDS]] Peer review
Talk:Lone Star (1996 film)

message: The third sentence of the Plot section says "Sam remembers Buddy as a distant parent who cheated on his mother".  Unless I missed something, Sam does not find out about this until about 2/3 of the way through the movie.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.200.133.51 (talk) 18:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A theme of the movie is "crossing borders" and the incest taboo border is one Sam and Pilar decide to cross because they don't want the past--and secret between the controlling Buddy and Mercedes that has kept them apart and longing for each other for decades--to divide them and cheat them of their happiness once again. Ariadne000 (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Nit-Picks
Talk:Eight Men Out

message: The ending listed does not match the film. I don't know if it matches the book. 71.175.74.238 (talk) 04:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect ending 

message: The list of the cast has the word "banned" beside certain names.  I'm assuming this is to indicate which players were permanently banned from baseball?  If so, then you left out a couple: Shoeless Joe Jackson and Buck Weaver.  Personally, I don't see the purpose of these indicators one way or the other.67.45.113.113 (talk) 20:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Banned"? 

message: The article contains this statement: "While they celebrate, however, Judge Landis bans the other 6 from professional baseball for life, citing their failure to reveal being approached by gambling interests in the first place."  Where does the article mention the other two players being banned?  Judge Landis' ban included all eight players.71.48.148.40 (talk) 17:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  All eight players were banned.
Talk:The Brother from Another Planet

message: Is there an association between the black protagonist having "three toes on each foot" and the phenomenon of ectrodactyly among the Vadoma? -- Deborahjay (talk) 19:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ectrodactyly as a genotype? 

message: This article could likely benefit from a section detailing the film's core themes/a more fleshed out plot summary. In particular, some scenes in the movie, including the first scene with the Brother on Ellis Island, the magic trick, a few of the monologues given by characters at the bar, have greater subtext that might be beneficial to explore. For instance, the manner in which the film addresses notions of Black history in the wake of gentrification in Harlem is quite compelling (can discuss scene recounting slavery in the history museum), and the movie's general comments on immigration might also warrant a standalone section of the Wiki page. The idea of silence is also integral to the film, with the Brother's inability to speak a potential commentary on the manner through which minorities are silenced in the U.S. I hope some of these suggestions help, and I am open to any advice/differing interpretations on how best to improve the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BagoChippington (talk • contribs) 03:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for Expanding the Article 
Talk:Lianna

message: I have removed the plot summary as it was a direct copy of the one at IMDB. Belovedfreak 22:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the plot summary. This was released initially in Canada...I think...Would like to see its impact. Very early positive movie about lesbians showing a love scene. Moni3 14:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: The page and infobox are here, but the article is entirely lacking. — Emiellaiendiay 18:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, write something! Luigibob (talk) 13:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Amazon Women on the Moon

message: Even on IMDB it is common practice for users to refer incorrectly to "Reefer Madness" as the source for the parody segment "Reckless Youth".  The storyline and several specific actions within the parody are directly selected from the lesser known "Sex Madness".  The original "Sex Madness" in its entirety can be found here http://www.archive.org/details/sex_madness.
Vidpotato 07:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The third paragraph of the lede says:
> Film actors making cameo appearances in various sketches included Rosanna Arquette, Ralph Bellamy, Griffin Dunne, Carrie Fisher, Steve Forrest, Steve Guttenberg, Michelle Pfeiffer, Kelly Preston, and Henry Silva, alongside television actors such as Ed Begley Jr., Bryan Cranston, David Alan Grier, Howard Hesseman, Peter Horton, William Marshall, Joe Pantoliano, Robert Picardo, and Roxie Roker.
Most of these are not cameos. Half of them are stars of one of the segments, which is much larger than a cameo. Others are bit-part actors playing bit parts who only later became famous (e.g., washed-out soap star turned non-union voiceover artist Bryan Cranston, years before he was a recurring part on Seinfeld, much less Breaking Bad). Also, what makes William "Blacula" Marshall a TV actor, but SWAT star Steve Forrest a movie actor? And why are Lana Clarkson, Sybil Danning, and Paul Bartel in the separate paragraphs of non-actor cameos instead of here? And Peter Horton is most of those at once (although since Thirtysomething premiered before the movie, he was a TV star as far as the advertising was concerned).
But, more to the point, why does the lede even need two paragraphs talking about some but not all of the cameos and attempting to categorize them? The complete list is in the Cast section? --157.131.202.156 (talk) 05:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameos
Talk:Small Soldiers

message: The plot description is too detailed, and to judge from the grammar, written by an 8 year old American. It should be abbreviated, and written in proper English.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 07:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot description

message: Because it has no context, I believe the "Reception" section should be removed. 210.4.122.111 (talk) 15:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There, you lazy bastards. Jg2904 (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception section 

message: "The character of Phil Fimple was originally chosen to be the only character to be killed off, but actor Phil Hartman was shot dead by his wife just before production began, so the character's life was spared."
That makes no sense.  Can someone explain? Mezigue (talk) 16:40, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure, but it is not verifiable. I've removed it. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:52, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phil Hartman 

message: Burger King big ad campaign for this movie. mention. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skA9lyT3khA  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.185.185.140 (talk) 07:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merchandising 

message: "the film was a commercial box office success." Really? A little under 55 million on a 40 million dollar budget doesn't sound like a huge success for a hollywood movie... -- Imladros (talk) 07:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial success
Talk:Hot Shots!

message: I've just rewritten this article and no one shall revert it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1006:B115:6C3D:CA83:7677:F8AE:2856 (talk) 10:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Rewritten 

message: Только так !! ) 
176.59.207.221 (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Startupper&Startpoopper !  

message: You need a link to
Hotshot_crew
2603:8001:3846:2D00:7C76:E2F:8F9B:3E84 (talk) 04:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  hotshot crew
Talk:The Beverly Hillbillies (film)

message: The most astonishing thing about this movie is that Jim Varney equals Buddy Ebsen's performance from the original series as Jed Clampett, something that I never really thought would be humanly possible for any actor.  The Final Edict (talk) 23:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Varney is Fantastic in This Movie

message: If we have to be told "voleur" is French for thief, don't we need to be told that Granny is exhaled to "The Old" nursing home in Spanish? 2600:1004:B156:556C:0:17:AF8F:2B01 (talk) 18:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign words
Talk:Ghost in the Machine (film)

message: The film is based on a serial killer Karl Hochman (Marcoux), the "address book killer" who is nearly slain by a head-on collision with a truck.
This statement makes it sound like Karl Hochman is a real serial killer and somehow inspired this movie.  I haven't seen it, but suspect this is not the case - could someone who's seen it fix that? -Elizabennet 22:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Spy Hard

message: Shouldnt it be mentioned that hulk hogan makes an apperance in this movie?
-Changed "Parody list" to "List of Gags" and put them in order of when they occured in the film. Also did some touch-ups to the section- (Lemmy12)
"Sam Steele" may also be a reference to Sir Samuel Blenfield Steele, Superintendant of the North-West Mounted Police and a major force of law & order in the Yukon gold rush. Since Leslie Nielsen was born in Yukon, I think this is more than likely.Jeremicus rex 01:35, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

message: From the look of it, when the girl falls off the cliff at the start, it seems to freeze for a second, which looks identical to Gruber falling out of the building in Die Hard 1. 91.84.7.89 09:29, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Die Hard Gags
Talk:The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear

message: Weird Al Yankovic has a short cameo when Frank arrives at the police station. He is playing the thug that gets knocked out by Fank opening a door. The DVD audio commentaries confirm this. --Strahlehans 06:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameo by Weird Al 

message: Was the pitchman in the TV ad for nuclear power Phil Swift of "Flex Seal" fame? 96.237.117.48 (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast: Pitchman for living near nuclear plant