Talk:Karen Hayes

message: :Image:Karen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Karen.jpg

message: I'm not sure the details regarding Lennox's blackmailing of her is correct. Neither she nor Buchanan did anything illegal or inethical. They both followed procedure and released Fayed due to lack of evidence.
Did she actually make an attempt to conceal this fact? I don't think she did. Lennox's angle was that it would be seen to be negligent - I think he was intending to use public perception, rather than legality, to damage Hayes and by association, the Administration.
Any thoughts?
82.13.43.168 19:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hayes v Lennox 

message: Keep at least for now.  Karen was a pretty major part of Season 6 and the latter half of Day 5.  She also is Bill's wife and was in a very high position in the government.  As Bill is returning in Day 7 I think we should wait to see if Karen will appear (like the Tony-Michele reappearances in Day 4) and if she's absent from that season then we'll see what happens from there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.17.210 (talk) 00:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lucy Marie, first and foremost, I am no one's sock puppet. If you have proof that you'd like to offer up, please do so or apologize for the accusation. Secondly, Tuna is correct. Karen Hayes does not belong in a list of minor CTU agents. She was the Division Director of Homeland Security. Honestly, does your insane merger madness have any boundaries? At ALL? Third, you are one of the last people who should be critiquing the context of someone else's remarks. You are barely literate in what you write, and have mangled the English language so thoroughly, that I have to read your comments several times to even ATTEMPT to understand what ridiculous point you're trying to make. Angelriver (talk) 05:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I've been asked to intercede here which I am happy to do as the edit war is really stupid. Firstly everyone needs to stop edit warring over the tag. Let's just leave the tag alone for a little while, it really doesn't hurt to have it there for a little longer. Lucie Marie, concensus appears to be against you. Please state your reasons for this character not meriting an article of her own. You need to perseude everyone else to change their mind. Also everyone please remain civil. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 08:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for coming by. I've been civil, though I was tempted otherwise by her hostile reverts and accusations. Basically, you're saying the same thing I am, except I wanted the tag removed while Lucy-marie states her case. What's a reasonable amount of time before tag removal?  The original merge tag was added November 4, and Lucy-marie already failed to garner any support in almost 2 months. TunaSushi (talk) 19:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking along the lines of a week or so. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 23:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I'm currently attempting to add extra citations to the article, so far, I have added one citation, so should the tag "No citations or sources" be changed? Personally I do not know how to do this, could someone else do this? Steve Crossin (talk) 04:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag- No Citations