lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:United States v. Stewart (2003)

message: Wodan added the following to the Article: "[Congress can criminalize possession of homemade machine guns]...under the commerce clause even though none of their components were ever, or will ever will be [sic] transferred, sold, or involved in any sort of commerce transaction."
The problem here is the "will ever be." This is something we can't know; to prove that Stewart never would have transferred or sold the guns, had he not been arrested and his guns seized, is an impossible counterfactual. It should therefore be left out. The sentence also needs to be revised so that its errors of grammar and usage can be eliminated. Finally, the sentence's tone has a pretty POV flavor ("were ever, or will ever" and "any sort of" sound like as if they come from a brief, not an encylopedia article). I'm going to make changes to correct these problems. Hydriotaphia 18:25, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit

message: Because this case was never argued or heard by the Supreme Court, I feel it doesn't belong in :Category:United States Supreme Court cases, and further doesn't deserve to be listed on the List of SCOTUS cases. Would anyone object to de-categorying it and removing it from the list? --MZMcBride 19:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Supreme Court case?

message: Stewart v. United States was a case in 1855, therefore the link does not work suitably.  See: volume #58.  
Accommodations for both cases must be provided!  Superslum 01:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this kind of thing happens commonly. It's not a problem unless someone wants to create an article for the other cases. Inevitably, recentism means this is slow to happen. If you do want to create an article for another case, move this article to "United States v. Stewart (2005)" and create a disambiguation page at the former location for links to the two or three different articles. Until those articles are created, it's not necessary to disambiguate.--Chaser - T 04:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cases with the same name
Talk:John Vassall

message: I have never heard of such a post as a commissioned RAF photographer and so I doubt that John Vassall should be included in the category of RAF Officers.  Any information on his RAF rank would be useful. 217.34.229.213 18:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RAF Officer

message: The consequences of the row over non-consultation is tagged as needing a citation.  I have not been able to verify this, but Google produces "The first episode, 'John Vassall', which dramatized the Vassall affair, ... The BBC was swiftly forced to apologise to both Lady Hayter and ..." The publication is behind a pay-wall for me: .  Davidships (talk) 14:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Docudrama 

message: Expansion of the theory that Vassall was sacrificed to protect a superior source shows up in https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-express/20240217/282570203028913. MizOre (talk) 05:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "According to some" is questioned as a non-sourced statement.
Talk:Elisabet Sahtouris

message: Thx for the article, but it would be helpful and more encyclopedia-proper to give at least of summary of this person's views -- whatever it is that makes her worthy of an article and the attention it says she receives. The reader can only infer that it's something to do with gaia theory... Hope this helps, "alyosha" (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info, please 

message: The article is very similar to her CV/resume:
http://www.sahtouris.com/docs/BioCVSahtouris2020.pdf
I think that this runs afoul of the 'no self-published source' guidelines: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Using_the_subject_as_a_self-published_source
It wouldn't be a huge deal in isolation, except that honestly, the article reads more like a CV than an encyclopedic entry. Wiki47222 (talk) 06:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whole article seems copied from her resume?
Talk:Orual

message: Removed the claim that Orual is the sister of Pysche in Greek mythology--I'm reasonably certain that Lewis invents the name for TWHF, but if anyone has a citation of Orual being used in Greek, feel free to cite here & revert.  Makrina 18:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Isn't the citation for the source of this information kind of obvious?  I don't understand the tag.  Maybe someone just needs to add the book to the page's bibliography.--71.112.151.205 (talk) 04:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article lacks citations...
Talk:Iuliu Maniu

message: Hello
I have a message for you regarding Iuliu Maniu. I create now 4 years a page that is running on 
www.iuliumaniu.ro; there you may find more information regarding this personality of Romanian politics.
In last days I create a page on facebook.com a page where I can share more informations with my users; if you want to be part of my little commnity (just 22 members, in less than 5 days), please join on Iuliu Maniu facebook page; there we can share more informations and we can find people that with who we share some great values.
Thanks
Popnadrian (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iuliu Maniu on Internet 
Talk:Nagware

message: * Agree.  They're like the same thing.Attitude2000 18:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Under the definition given in this article ("a type of shareware") - Microsoft's Windows Genuine Advantage program shouldn't be included because it "nags" users who are using pirated software, not those who have a shareware or "unregistered" version of Windows.  Either the definition of "nagware" needs to be changed somewhat, the WGA section needs to be removed, or the WGA needs to be adjusted to emphasize that the concept is slightly different. Matt 15:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and change it. :-) — Frecklefoot | Talk 15:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it. Mo-Al 01:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Example 

message: Freeware can also be nagware. 
For example a free to use program which nags the user to upgrade to a paid version with more features, but NOT disable the program after a trail period. The developers develop a free and paid version side by side.
Do note I am not talking about Crippleware.
Just like Evrsoft First Page 2006 ? After a period, it keeps nagging users at application startup and closing, to entice them to buy the Professional version, wich comes with even more features. Evrsoft First Page 2006 was touted as being free, however is more like nagware.--Omega Said 08:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freeware 

message: This is definitely not a neutral view.
Sounds like an opinion. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN 21:03, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Corrientes Province

message: I recommend changing the title of this article to "Corrientes (province)", since the territory is named Corrientes, not Corrientes Province. The word "province" is just to distiguish it from the city. ironcito 19:03, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We've gone through this several times. The name of the Province is "Provincia de Corrientes". Al the Argentine provinces have the word "Provincia" in its official name (say, "Casa de la Provincia de Río Negro" instead of "Casa de Río Negro"). The Portal of the Río Negro Province refers to itself as Portal de la Provincia de Rio Negro. I used the Río Negro example because there's no city with that name. Good wiking! Mariano(t/c) 10:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change 
Talk:2 euro commemorative coins

message: Hi all,
A couple of points for consideration:
* This article does seem rather lengthy and there are only going to be many more coins in the future: Would there be objections to split each year into a separate article?
* Some image links need to be corrected since they're not pointing at the Official Journal but blogposts. Furthermore, are we linking the HTML and PDF version?
* How about letting go of the few coin images still remaining?
QuantoAltoPossoVolare (talk) 11:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points for improvement 
Talk:John Gower

message: I plan to delete the following: "Gower takes the side of the aristocracy, and appears to have admired the techniques Richard II used to suppress the revolt." I am unable to find any admiration for Richard II's techniques in VC Book one. Cap. XVII suggests Richard failed to suppress the revolt. Credit is given to William Walworth in CAP XIX.Rdmoore6 (talk) 19:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Peasants'Revolt

message: Can anyone confirm this is the same John Gower who is dramatised by Shakespeare in Pericles, Prince of Tyre? AndyJones 19:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is Shakespeare's "ancient Gower". — Haeleth Talk 21:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. AndyJones 21:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've edited that bit to include Henry IV Part 2 and Henry V which also include Gower. Cariel (talk) 20:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gower in "Pericles"

message: I have suppressed (via hidden text) the remarks on Trentham manuscript for two reasons:
# I have not been able to obtain text of Sobecki article to verify references.
# They don't fit in Works section. It might be worth adding a Manuscript section as there are interesting things which could be include with Fisher Moral Philosopher and Macaulay as souce.Rdmoore6 (talk) 17:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Trentham manuscript

message: I am unable to find any citation to support Gower as "ideal English soldier" in Henry V. Perusal of Shakespeare's play does not support this. Act III Scene VI a character is addressed as "Captain Gower". There is little in John Gower's biography which would suggest he was a soldier.
Most occurrences of this phrase in Google are derived from the Wikipedia article. Principal exception is Gen Robert E Lee. 
https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/2669/McDonnell%20Dissertation%201.pdf.txt?sequence=3&isAllowed=y  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdmoore6 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideal English Soldier
Talk:Bruce Shanks

message: I have a copy of Bruce Shanks' award-winning "The Thinker" cartoon about organized labor, reproduced in a book. Would it be appropriate to scan and upload it here? And how do I set up the page that's used whenever a copyrighted graphic is used. (I was always a big Bruce Shanks fan, since childhood.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rp3 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Washington, Mississippi

message: When was Washington the capital of the state? I had thought the capital moved from Natchez to Jackson.
Please cite source.
Thanks.
Why isn't there more detailed history on the population, economy etc., and references on this important region? Why is there no doucmentation that this was a MAJOR slave plantation and refuge? This is American history, and these historical facts need to be known.--74.229.102.208 (talk) 20:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article doesn't have any current or recent population numbers, and I can't immediately find any with some cursory google-grade research.  Does this unincorporated community have defined borders for census purposes, or is this necessarily going to be imprecise?  If estimates even exist in any usable source.  109.255.211.6 (talk) 04:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any population numbers? 

message: What happened to Washington to change it from a thriving community into being unincorporated? 170.103.116.191 (talk) 20:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to result in its being unincorporated?
Talk:Category

message: simplified self-reference didn't work - what does this mean? Tedernst | talk 19:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It just showed the text "For Wikipedia categories, see " at the top of the page. Instead of linking to the :Category:Categories you've added the article to this category. I've just figured out what was wrong and it's the reason why I've reverted to the previous version instead of fixing your edit. Besides, I like it more the way it was before :-) If you want to change this to the way you like it, note the colon when you link to a category. Jogers 20:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Self-reference

message: Why is that picture there (twice!), and why can't I see the code for it in the edit page so I can remove it?  Aleta 04:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image??

message: I've just corrected the Greek spelling of kategoria: the previous version was misspelt, & had an accent on every vowel for good measure! --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 11:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Should this be changed from  to ? After all, each example is about some kind of category (and this is true for the see also disambigs). Dpleibovitz (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not e.g. because it would mean that unintentional incoming links would probably not get fixed. Why would it would be better as a SIA? A broad concept article might just work (although TBH I don't think you would be the best person to write it). DexDor (talk) 13:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Set index article 

message: How can I find whether my memory is wrong about the former existence of a group of categories (Delegates to the Democratic and Republican quadrennial national conventions)? --Orange Mike | Talk 16:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_November_22#Category%3ADelegates_to_the_Republican_National_Convention? DexDor (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost categories
Talk:In eminenti apostolatus

message: Could we include a translation of this phrase, please... I know it is sad, but fewer and fewer people speak Latin these days. :>)  Blueboar 19:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm looking at it again and it doesn't make sense.  My Latin is non-existent so my attempt "because we note that some of reasonable right" could mean anything.  I'll get rid of it shortly.  --JASpencer 23:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "and for the other just and reasonable motives known to Us;" (from the English translation at papalencyclicals.net).  --Kenatipo  speak! 14:05, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  “aliisque de iustis ac rationabilibus causis Nobis notis”  

message: The title Eminenti Apostolatus Specula is incorrect in two aspects, I believe: conventionally, only the first word is capitalized in a papal bull, and no words are omitted. It is also a general convention that incipits are of two words, not including minor words, thus correctly In eminenti apostolatus: I do notice that the Latin text at Papalencyclicals.net just gives In eminenti; the compilers must be giving unusual weight to in, one can only suppose.--Wetman 19:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The full text belongs at Wikitexts or whatever.--Wetman (talk) 20:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Josh Abraham

message: I'll watch this page, since nobody else even bothers to look at it that much.  I'll also update it when I can get new info on Josh.  If you can help, post on here. Linkin Park Protector 19:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 18:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Notification system

message: Links section is filling up with link spam.  Please review Wikipedia linking guidelines, particularly the section regarding links which promote commercial websites WP:EL.  If you wish to add external links, please submit request to discussion page here first and let a Neutral editor add the link. Calltech 17:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove Link Spam

message: Following the procedure as requested, I would like the following external link added by a Neutral editor please.
 Emergency Notification System for the U.S. Air Force Reserve Command provided by AtHoc
Aerobe (talk) 13:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed inclusion of External Link

message: The general topic has been studied in academic mathematics literature.  For example, for a system like a fixed telephone tree to share news/info from every node to every other node, what configuration of connection would guarantee that all info gets to every recipient if there is one transmission failure.  Or if there are two failures, or three, etc.  The article should be improved to indicate some of this. --doncram 19:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: mathematics on the general topic

message: ENGLISH 103.155.118.138 (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub 

message: — Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture
Talk:New York Heart Association Functional Classification

message: Can we have the original reference please? Jellytussle 19:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Please merge any relevant content from [ New York Heart Association] per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Heart Association.  Thanks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 05:12Z
Even though  a person has had congestive heart failure do they have to fall under one of the classification functional to get their disabilty  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.235.128.133 (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[New York Heart Association]]
Talk:Danger triangle of the face

message: The article states that the valvelessness of facial veins is a 'common misconception', yet it is still held as fact at most major medical and dental schools, as well as in well-regarded textbooks. I am not an expert in this so if someone could review this statement, that would be great.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.102.82.103 (talk) 00:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Common Misconception" 

message: Is there also a danger triangle not of the face? Or if not for reasons of disambiguity, why the unwieldy name? Arlo James Barnes 02:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  name
Talk:Mikado (game)

message: I put the color coding and points info in the 'Rules' paragraphs in a table, but I'm wondering about the color coding. All pictures of Mikado games I can find have the sticks coded with 2, 3 or 5 stripes of alternating red, blue and yellow (red/blue, red/yellow/blue, blue/red/blue, red/blue/red/blue/red, and the spiraling blue of the Mikado). Who knows the actual 'classic' coloring, and what "middle wide two narrow stripes on the ends" means? -Shai-kun 17:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color coding 

message: This sentence under the Rules section doesn't seem to make sense: "It is allowed to stand up on but not to leave the own place." Am I missing something here? 68.186.170.188 (talk) 18:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A particular sentence... 

message: "Maybe in the course of Japonism in the 19th / 20th century the "Zitterwackel" game had changed to "Mikado" (probably first named "Tsuchimikado")."
:What is a Zitterwackel? --46.59.142.230 (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is your friend— de:Mikado (Spiel)#Name WurmWoodeT 20:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zitterwackel
Talk:Laboratory animal suppliers in the United Kingdom

message: I delinked most of the farms because a number of them were pointing to the wrong places.
What I (and most other editors) would usually do is change the links to point to a new article, like this: Harlan. That would point the Harlan farms to a new article at 'Harlan (farm)', instead of Harlan which is a disambiguation page. I didn't do that because I don't know if Arfan or anyone else intends to create articles on all of the farms. Before doing so I recommend they read our guidelines for inclusion of companies, though any farm that was closed due to a terrorist campaign would almost certainly be notable. --Last Malthusian 19:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK thanks. I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to change the name to "Laboratory Animal Suppliers in the UK" since it isn't really a list any more. Are there any guidelines on creating country-specific pages since I'm interested mainly in the history of the animal rights movement in the UK? Or should it be an international page with subsection for different countries as and when they are added? Arfan2006 22:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You could start it as Laboratory animals suppliers in the UK and then move it if non-UK ones are added. Or else start it as Laboratory animal suppliers, create a section called Suppliers in the UK, add your list, and then wait for someone else to add other sections. It's up to you; I don't believe there are any guidelines about it. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2006

message: I added POV and unfocused tags because this article reads as a criticism of the animal rights movement. It should discuss the suppliers themselves and the industry, not its critics. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|POV}} and {{tl|unfocused}} tags
Talk:Nicolaou Taxol total synthesis

message: Neutral taxol image:
V8rik 19:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice image. ~K 20:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Should anything be included here about how Nicolau had the first published synthesis, even though Holton submitted his first? Just a thought... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.189.22.119 (talk) 05:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First synthesis 

message: …for a proposed change under discussion, on an article in which you have had interest: .  Cheers, Le Prof  Leprof 7272 (talk) 15:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  See this link
Talk:Hooshang Heshmat

message: I moved it since we don't keep titles in name.  It shouldn't be controversial... but, I just want to let any editors know. gren グレン 20:01, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Uhh, I just reverted to Zereshk's old version since the other version seemed like an add and was a copyvio from here.  Zereshk's was about a seemingly notable person from Iran.  I really don't understand but copyright violations are not acceptable. gren グレン 20:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Scratch that, this is a mess, asking creator. gren グレン 20:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 
Talk:Keir O'Donnell

message: keir had a lead role in paintball movie Splat! In 2002 but it's not listed in his filmography. It was sold on DVD. 2600:1010:B1A8:A44E:0:54:B123:D01 (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First movie in 2002 was Splat!