Talk:Peugeot

message: Automobiles PEUGEOT is the brand under which P.S.A. sells Peugeot motor vehicles. PEUGEOT SA is not a subsidiary of PSA PEUGEOT CITROEN, the relationship is the otherway around. 
Automobiles PEUGEOT is a subsidiary of P.S.A. in the same way that Automobiles CITROEN is a subsidiary of P.S.A. both of the commercial entities buy their vehicles from the manufacturing company PSA-PEUGEOT-CITROEN which is also a subholding of P.S.A (Check out the annual report of PSA for a full map outlining all of the different relationships for the consolidated accounts : http://www.psa-peugeot-citroen.com)Madmannimann (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Peugeot is a range of cars produced by PSA Peugeot Citroën, also known officially as Peugeot SA (that's why it is called PSA). This article should be about the Peugeot products, not the PSA holding company. Some editing is needed in the 1980s and on history to move holding company information to PSA, and keep this article focussed on Peugeot products. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 11:10, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automobiles PEUGEOT =

message: Here are some pictures of old models, to complete the explanation for the central '0' that would have been made for the starting handle:
401: http://www.motorimania.it/manifestazioni/auto_storiche/images_peugeot/b_peugeot_401_11.jpg
601: http://www.amicale-peugeot.ch/Bilder%20Fahrzeugtypen/601_1.jpg
We can clearly see that the hole is not in the model plate
302 : http://appassionato.fiat.free.fr/salon/DCP_0325.jpg
Here we see that the '0' is used for both model number and as an hole
Antp 09:49, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the '0' 

message: I'm maltese and only the illiterate pronounce it 'poo goo'! for god's sake!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.203.47.66 (talk) 19:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malta Poo Goo? 

message: The front screen wipers for the 307 LX is badly designed for UK users.  The driver side wiper cannot reach close to the edge of the screen and leaves quite a big area unclear during driving in a rainy or snowy day.  The blocked area is measured about 5 inches from the side and 7-8 inches from the top.  The wiper on the driver side is shorter than the one on the left thus the passenager side can have a better view than the driver.  Driver of this model has to move to the centre while driving in a bad weather, it is very dangerous and uncomfortable. It is redicious for Peugeot to sell problematic car by ignoring the safety and comfortableness issues.   
Having written to complain (email) about the faulty design, the response is that the design was under the safety regulation with 80% visible area.  However, the 80% visible area is on the passenger side.  Having raised this issue with the Peugeot dealer, Belmont, staff agreed that this model was converted from European stock.  It is impossible to change the front screen wipers.  This is the way it is! 
Can anyone comment on this?  Is it common for car manufacturers to convert European cars for use in UK can without thorough thinking?  What is the customers right after purchase?
Comment on above issue: The earlier versions of the 307 was designed with a single mechanism for both RHD and LHD versions, the screen does provide enough coverage when wiped for a RHD model, and the explanation given by the dealership is mis-leading. The vehicle was designed this way and it is not a conversion from "European Stock". If you want to know a little more try "info@peugeot.com" (my old email address in a former life in Paris) All complaints about this in 2004 were sent to the engineering team for analysis for the facelift (T-6), including the video of a 307 being driven round Tokyo in the rain. Madmannimann (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  307 LX UK cars converted from Europe's stock 

message: Peugeot used 101,102, and 103 for their models of mopeds from 1960s through the 1990s!  Please add this!  It's funny and interesting that they continued to 104 as a car! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.215.140.12 (talk) 03:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add the mopeds! 

message: Can anybody substantiate something? I've heard the 345 hemi design went to Simca & was built in Europe for years, including in tank/armored car engines, then ended up in Brazil as a 137ci. True? Include it?  Trekphiler (talk) 13:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  C'est l'hemi? 

message: Thankfully enough, the large number of historic Peugeot models (from 1889 to 1944) have their links all properly categorized.  That may not be very helpful anyway, since some of the models are merely different bodywork of the same essential car and don't deserve their own page.  However, few of the Peugeot cars of this era have articles at all, and the ones that do are all towards the end of the period.  My interest in Peugeot is limited and my experience nonexistent; but I do hate that big sea of red that accompanies a timeline full of links with no articles behind them.  I've already made small entries for the Type 3 and the Type 54 and hopefully others will be interested in filling in the gaps and making an appropriate article or section of an article for each model. Chaparral2J (talk) 13:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Really old cars

message: I don't think that the pop culture section of this article is very important. If it had more examples, such as in films, etc. then it might be relevant. Otherwise I would just consider that section trivia, and delete it. --Robo56 (talk) 02:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say the first recorded car theft rises to the level of sufficient interest.  TREKphiler hit me ♠  03:15, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop Culture? 

message: I'm refering to your actual logo of Peugeot 
First: The official background color is transparent (white) not black. </br>
Second: The picture uploaded at Commons is a copyright violation. It must be deleted there.
I don't know if you can upload this logo locally on en.wikipedia but if yes so please upload correct verson as here:
real Peugeot Logo de.wikipedia Thank you! User Pressemappe --86.33.169.56 (talk) 11:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Peugeot logo 2010 is wrong 

message: This article says Peugeot is officially Peugeot S.A.  in the infobox and "Peugeot is a major French car brand, part of PSA Peugeot Citroën"  and "Parent :	PSA Peugeot Citroën"   the PSA article says "PSA Peugeot Citroën (officially Peugeot S.A.)" so which one is correct? this needs to be clarified somehow.   -->Typ932 T·C 12:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This conversation is also at the top of the talk page. According to the company's registration document: The name “PSA Peugeot Citroën” refers to the entire Group of companies owned by the Peugeot S.A. holding company  and interestingly was incorporated in 1896. In 1998 PSA transferred all development and manufacturing assets from Automobiles Peugeot and Automobiles Citroën to Peugeot Citroën Automobiles SA. I shall update the infobox and intro paragraph to suit. See page 90 of the registration document for a full breakdown of the company structure. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peugeot company structure 

message: I just noticed: there are multiple dates of "founding". As I understand the term, "founding" happens only once. After that, it's adding a division or new business, not creating an entirely new company. Thus, multiple "founded" is out of place. Beyond that, it's cluttering the infobox for no reason; the explanation belongs in the text. Absent objections, I intend to delete.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 15:23, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a typo under Early History. It says "... began in the manufacturing business in the 18th century". If the company was founded in 1810 then it should say "19th" century.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.188.43 (talk) 05:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost and founders 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Peugeot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140219051052/http://business.time.com/2014/02/18/chinese-automaker-dongfeng-to-invest-1-1-billion-in-peugeot/ to http://business.time.com/2014/02/18/chinese-automaker-dongfeng-to-invest-1-1-billion-in-peugeot/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140225191035/http://www.peugeot.com/en/news/2008/10/2/prologue-hymotion4-a-new-generation-hybrid-cross-over.aspx?count=&filterBy=1&page=1 to http://www.peugeot.com/en/news/2008/10/2/prologue-hymotion4-a-new-generation-hybrid-cross-over.aspx?count=&filterBy=1&page=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:42, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Peugeot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807025428/http://www.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/document/amf/doc%20de%20ref%20gb1303467412.pdf to http://www.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/document/amf/doc%20de%20ref%20gb1303467412.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120114082943/http://www.peugeot.com.au/peugeot-in-australia/ to http://www.peugeot.com.au/peugeot-in-australia/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141109161845/http://uiga.marinaterpolilli.com/premio%20uiga%20auto%20europa%202015%20peugeot%20308 to http://uiga.marinaterpolilli.com/premio%20uiga%20auto%20europa%202015%20peugeot%20308
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090426103357/http://www.rsportscars.com/peugeot/2009-peugeot-rc-hybrid-electric-concept/ to http://www.rsportscars.com/peugeot/2009-peugeot-rc-hybrid-electric-concept/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928053656/https://www.musee-peugeot.com/Front/index.aspx to http://www.musee-peugeot.com/Front/index.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Look at the very beginning of the article: "The Peugeot family of Valentigney, Montbéliard, Franche-Comté, France, began in the manufacturing business in the 19th century. In 1842, they added production of coffee, pepper, and salt grinders" -- the business of manufacturing what? Added production to what? 93.185.27.5 (talk) 16:15, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  REALLY bad writing 

message: Okay so apparently I made an edit that Peugeot was entering the United States and Canada markets in 2023, which is actually true. The problem: a user reverted my contributions with a supposedly invalid summary that this is not a "crystalball" per wp:not. It is true, Peugeot will enter the us and Canadian markets in 2023 and even reliable sources like cnbc have reported on this reentry into the north American markets. 
Feel free to discuss about this dispute so we can try to reach a consensus. Should we reach one, I might add a source (possibly cnbc) to go along with it. Metric Supporter 89 (talk) 04:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard rumors that Peugeot has plans to expand to the US  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:CD:C000:3DE0:AD33:4F1C:A1F8:B11B (talk) 23:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peugeot re-entry into North American market

message: Will red brushes come down in the Egyptian market? 41.40.187.86 (talk) 15:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will red brushes come down in the Egyptian market?