Talk:Bruker

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I nominated this article for deletion because it seems confusing and, ultimately, unverifiable/not useful. The article describes Bruker Corporation as its parent, so presumably this article's subject is a subsiduary. It talks about the production of scientific instruments. The Bruker Corporation website does not list its headquarters as Massachussetts, USA - this is the address of Bruker Daltonics Inc. Sionk (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been reworded to make it clear the subject is Bruker Corporation Sionk (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article confusion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Bruker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121104094601/http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=BRKR to http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=brkr
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It seems to me that Günther Laukien Prize should be merged to this article as not independently notable of the corporation. SL93 (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose on the grounds that merging to ENC (had they a page) would be more appropriate than merging to Bruker (the funder). It's also not uncommon for major prizes to have a separate page, (there are vast number listed through :Category:Science and technology awards) and this one seems to fall within the range that is deemed appropriate for a separate page. Klbrain (talk) 07:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 16:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal