lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:NATO summit

message: Conventionally, there is only one NATO summit for heads of state during a single year.  The exception was 1989, when the "regular" summit in the Spring was supplemented by an emergency meeting in December.  The editor who created this navbox template suggested that the article titles for these two summits should be distinguished by the name of the month in which the meetings took place.  Yes, of course, I agree with that reasoning; however, I think it's better to append the dates in parenthesis after the more important information in the title.  
* May 1989 Brussels summit ----> 1989 Brussels summit (May)
* December 1989 Brussels summit ----> 1989 Brussels summit (December)
In other words, I think that the date and location are arguably the most important information the title needs convey; and the months are merely included for disambiguation.
The editor who created the chart/graph on this page included no disambiguation, identifying both as simply 1989 Brussels summit.  I have changed this page consistent with the changes I've already made in that navbox template.
This can be changed, of course, if some better way of handling this seems better ...? --Tenmei (talk) 19:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1989

message: I find it incredibly obnoxious that none of the summit articles use the word "NATO" in their names. The implicit assumption that no other summits exist in the world, other than Nato's. Talk about a total ego trip.... 184.78.81.245 (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summit names 

message: "Switzerland, Sweden, Ireland, Austria, Andorra, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, San Marino, Finland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Serbia, Moldova, Malta and Cyprus are the non-NATO countries who do not take part in all NATO summits." This is unclear. What about Ukraine? Isn't that a non-NATO country that does not take part in all NATO summits? Arctic Gazelle (talk) 22:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't Ukraine " a non-NATO country that does not take part in all NATO summits"? 

message: Shouldn't 2015_NATO_emergency_meeting be included?  Fephisto (talk) 20:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2015 

message: The current “Participating Countries” list/section is misleading at best and NATO propaganda at worst. This section needs to be reworked. Wikipedia is supposed to be educational and neutral. The fact of the matter is 4 non-NATO countries have been at the last 2 summits with no plans whatsoever to exclude them from future summits. Try finding out the list of countries participating in this year’s summit and take note of the news blackout about which countries will actually be around the table. AlGarcia41 (talk) 20:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current “Participating Countries” list/section
Talk:First Philippic

message: I thought Macedonian means Greek? Why don't you put some original phillipic texts? No need to explain what is written there, we can all get an impression from the actual text.217.16.90.60 (talk) 08:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: MAcedonian

message: — Assignment last updated by Jonathan D12 (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Ancient Greece
Talk:Frank Hill

message: There appears to be a discrepancy with Hill's date of death. This article claims that he died in California in 1993. However, his biography in my Burnley F.C. history book () says that he died in Luton, Bedfordshire in June 1970. I don't know which is correct, and I was about to make a WP:BOLD edit and change it but I thought I would check here first. Cheers, BigDom 20:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Dorsal raphe nucleus

message: Holy cow, this page is in major need of work.  There is a lot of important information missing, and there is a lot of irrelevant or unimportant information included.  I know a good deal about the dorsal raphe, but have never edited a Wikipedia page.  To take a small step in that direction I'll first propose some changes here and see if anybody has any feedback.  -RAM
Article sections I'd propose:
1. Basic overview - serotonergic brainstem nucleus, the main source of serotonin to forebrain
2. Role in controlling organism's physiology/behavior - general behavioral state, anxiety/depression/stress
3. Neurochemistry - classical neurotransmitters expressed (5-HT, GABA, DA, glutamate? [vglut3]), neuropeptides co-expressed
4. Anatomy - afferents, efferents
:Welcome to Wikipedia! I'd like to encourage you to be bold about updating the page, and if you have any questions, feel free to ask me. I also encourage you to get an account -- it's not mandatory, but you'll probably find it helps you achieve your goals. More details are available at Wikipedia:Why create an account?. --Arcadian 02:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed changes 

message: Suicide is not something that happens to a human being like a heart attack or an Epileptic seizure. Suicide is a complex action and should not be in the article.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suicide in article
Talk:Jan Zachwatowicz

message: *  JAK FENIKS Z POPIOŁÓW... JAN ZACHWATOWICZ (1900-1983)
*  Lwowska - Jan Zachwatowicz
*  filmpolski.pl: JAN ZACHWATOWICZ 1900 - 1983
*  Jan Zachwatowicz, 1900-1983, Reportaż Magdaleny Grochowskiej, Gazeta Wyborcza, 2005-05-13
*  Encyklopedia Warszawy, PWN, Warszawa 1994
*  Jan Zachwatowicz 1900-1983, The Royal Castle in Warsaw
—Visor (talk) 16:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Further references
Talk:St Cyrus

message: The time and date of services are non-encyclopedic, as is the name of the minister, unless they meet notability standards. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the minister have a Wikipedia article?  No?  Non-notable, sorry. Check every other church article on Wikipedia - no times of service.  This is not a town directory. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

text: It is not notable. Wikipedia is not a directory service. There is no valid reason to include this in the article. This is an encyclopedia. --Smashvilletalk 16:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

text: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. In fact in this case, it looks like all of those articles need to be cleaned up. This is absolutely not something that belongs on Wikipedia. --Smashvilletalk 17:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church information 

message: Worth a mention? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lard?
Talk:Crime Wave (CSI: Miami)

message: This seems to actually be the seventh episode, aired on November 8th. The 8th episode being Speed Kills. Someone with more knowledge about CSI please confirm this. --Darkbane 16:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I've removed the priamrysources tag as per this discussion at the Village Pump.  The discussion states primary sources are more than adequate for simple verification or description of facts (which is all this plot summary seems to be to me). --Formerly the IP-Address 24.22.227.53 (talk) 02:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primarysources removal
Talk:Bugulumbya Secondary School

message: My comments are: A short article with some encyclopedic information. Needs expansion to go into further details about the schools past and current events. References, an infobox and perhaps a picture would be good too. I am hence, rating this article as Stub / Low. Camaron1 | Chris 16:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Proxflyer

message: Article sounds as though it was written by someone with financial interest in the product:
* There is no talk of limitations of the design; e.g., how does the simplicity affect maneuverability, performance, etc?
* There are no negative attributes described.
* There are some exaggerations; e.g., "Silent: the mechanical drives and the rotors generate no noise" -- This is impossible.  Unit may be extremely quiet, but cannot be silent.
Counter-rotating rotor heads have been in existence for more than 50 years.  It would be useful to explain how the Muren patent is different from or improves on the original concept.
It also appears that this article may describe the prototype used to develop the Interactive Toy Concepts Micro Mosquito.  In that case, this article should be merged into the latter.  -- algocu 17:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How is the Muren design better than the stabilizer bar system (Arthur M. Young)? It's hard to understand how the Muren design works from the description. I have seen a Micro Mosquito clone called the Syma 608 which uses the stabilizer bar system - seems to fly OK.
Don't merge. Prox Dynamics focus on creating expensive micro UAV's for the military etc even though they have licenced some of their technology to interactive toy concepts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.18.216.204 (talk) 21:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Steyr TMP

message: was wondering if its legal to own a Steyr TMP in the United States.  This would look good in my future collection.(already got alot of swords)  Murakumo-Elite (talk) 01:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming the TMP was only available after 1986, the only way to legally own one is to qualify to own post samples. The SPP is an easy way around this, but its lack of a forward handle might hurt it in the way of looks. --Leif Runenritzer (talk) 22:09, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  legal to own? 

message: Could someone please correct the format of the MP9 file I uploaded? Please and thank you! Casual Internet Surfer (talk) 19:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help 

message: The USER Swiss Army is missed in this listing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.197.125.221 (talk) 10:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swiss Army missing 
Talk:Gunflint chert

message: Present article (12 May 07) says 2.51 Ga in first sentence, and 1.9-2.3 Ga in second. First web reference says 1.6-1.9 Ga for 'Gunflint range iron formations' (is this the same thing?); second web reference says 2 Ga. Is it that poorly dated? Can anyone improve this with a good reference? --Zamphuor 16:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age?

message: I moved the page because "Gunflint chert" appears to be the correct capitalization: it is described that way in the article, "chert" didn't seem to be a proper noun, and I saw it written that way in a paleontology book I own. However, I have now seen additional sources with the C capitalized, and I am considering moving it back. Any thoughts? Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 19:01, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done a bit of looking since my comment on your talk and now think the lower case "c" is best. The Gunflint Formation is the stratigraphic unit which contains a Lower Algal Chert Member, an Upper Algal Chert Member and a limestone member above. See this pdf from Can. J. Earth Sci. 37: 1229–1243 (2000) for details. The lower of the two chert members contains the noted fossils. Vsmith (talk) 23:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Don't know what to do with it but this article allegedly describes Gunflintia and Huroniospora someone eating the other. Yummy-yummy! Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 06:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Eating bacteria

message: Should be Gunflint Chert, it is a formation name, not a type of chert. Tisquesusa (talk) 13:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I will be editing this wikipedia page as part of a Precambrian Geology class assignment. I plan to make minor edits to the existing intro paragraphs, and plan to add new sections including 'Stratigraphy', 'Age', 'History', 'Microfaunal Diversity', and 'Preservation'. I also plan to add a microscope image of a Gunflint stromatolitic slide to highlight the microorganisms that comprise the Gunflint Chert. Tmahseredjian (talk) 01:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Metaphone

message: Well, the main problem with that algorithm is: there is no real sound of English with regard to writing (Phonem-to-graphem). Read or read, know or sew? Pretty tough to try such a language. --media_lib 16:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Main problem with that algorithm

message: Some links in the 'Downloadable Implementations' section link to Double Metaphone, not the current article. This should be reviewed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.15.229.19 (talk) 02:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review External Links 

message: The Metaphone 3 section's final sentence seems irrelevant, and almost like an advertisement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikedominice (talk • contribs) 15:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the problem. As of now, it appears to be a factual statement that Metaphone 3 is commercial software and a list of the languages in which it is officially implemented. SoledadKabocha (talk) 05:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  It does seem to be an advertisement. It should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.89.150.115 (talk) 07:13, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Code Availability 

message: The last sentence of the "Procedure" section begins "To implement Metaphone without purchasing an open source copy of Metaphone 3...", but I don't see how Metaphone 3 satisfies any common definition of open-source software. None of the references make such a claim, let alone name a specific open-source license. On the contrary, reference 6 (http://aspell.net/metaphone/) states that it is "not free software." (Admittedly, free and open-source are not exactly the same thing, and there could be some gratis versus libre confusion in this statement.)
Is it okay if I remove the "open source" wording? SoledadKabocha (talk) 05:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open source
Talk:Rebellion (Lies)

message: (Sorry my English is not so good)
There was also a 7" vynil version of this single released by Rough Trade. 
*Side A contains Rebellion (Lies) (Edit)
*Side B contains Rebellion (Lies) (Live from the Great American Music Hall, January 2005) recorded & mixed by Jason Ward.
Art & Design by Tracy Maurice & Onya Hogan-Finlay.
--83.61.144.112 (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vynil version of the single (7")
Talk:Intervention (song)

message: today is the 21st, so "set to be released on the may 21" is no longer valid. i would edit it, but i have no idea whether or not it was released. was it?
Academic decathlete 01:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cabinet (file format)

message: Why is their an internal link in external links section. It also seems unrelated. I chose to remove it.
* 7-Zip is an LGPL licensed utility that supports 7z, ZIP, CAB, ARJ, GZIP, BZIP2, TAR, CPIO, RPM and DEB (though it can only create archives in 7z, ZIP, Gzip, Bzip2, and TAR format). 
Ultra two (talk) 10:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-external link

message: The top google hits and the microsoft FAQ are too cluttered with extraneous detail to be useful to people who only need a quick explanation of these files, so a better summary here would be useful.  I expect many people who reach this page are not looking for technical details, but have just come across a bunch of .cab files cluttering their storage (especially on Windows Mobile devices with limited space) and are wondering whether they can be deleted (like .zip files generally can, after an install).  Do these files need to be treated with care?  Do apps keep using them after the first time?  There a bit of intelligible information here 
DKEdwards 16:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: suggested content

message: Expand redirects here, so I had compact do the same thing. That said, I'd like to verify that .cab and .??_ are related format and that compact actually should redirect here. If not, can we fix this by expanding this article, or do we need to break the other two out somewhere else? MrZaiustalk 13:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects - Accurate?

message: The "often associated" phrase is marked with "[by whom?]", but this is the wrong meaning of "associated." In this context, it means "the file extension is often set to be associated by the operating system with a certain program," not "people often associate the extension with certain programs." --2600:8807:A641:D200:102A:F736:99EB:2078 (talk) 09:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "often associated [by whom?]"
Talk:Blackburn, Aberdeenshire

message: That almost called for semi-protection...--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 00:38, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Seeking any information related to this Inn and who owned it. 2601:100:8780:4D60:BC8B:15C4:B328:A447 (talk) 15:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stewart's Inn in Blackburn Aberdeenshire in the 1830s
Talk:Kingswells

message: I am not sure if I reverted edits correctly. user:kingswell added much information, but not sure if it should remain.  Please advise.  I apologize if rv were not done correctly.--Startstop123 (talk) 16:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: statistical info

message: What I want to know is, where are / were the wells, and which king did they belong to?  --Doric Loon (talk) 10:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Toponymy
Talk:Tarfside

message: At the moment there is a large chunk of text relating to activities in the area in World War Two. This lacks a source, but it seems to have been added by an anonymous editor in 2016. As it stands it is not clear if this is trustworthy information. Does anybody have a reliable source to back it up? Dunarc (talk) 19:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War Two information
Talk:Gardenstown

message: Absolutely zero history of the village. No demographic or qualitative information on the village. No geographical information on the village. 
Essentially this is tabloid trivia mostly about an irrelevant TV show of no importance, and a  placeholder list of spam for local businesses. (many of the spam links have now been removed)
Improve it, in an NPOV encyclopedic manner, or delete it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.143.187 (talk) 18:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Or else what?! Improve the article yourself if you think it's so necessary. ADROITfr1 (talk) 01:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truly dreadful "article"
Talk:Calvin Pearl Titus

message: A picture of Calvin Pearl Titus is displayed on the US Navy website (http://www.msc.navy.mil/inventory/citations/titus.htm). Can, and should, this image be uploaded and used for his profile page, as well as the List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Boxer Rebellion wikipedia page?
Bullmoosebell (talk) 21:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Calvin P. Titus 

message: What on earth does "the last American standard-bearer" mean? Do American troops not carry standards on parade? Or does it mean he was the last to carry a standard in action. In this case (which is what I suspect is meant), the wording should be clarified. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:35, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:White Eagles (paramilitary)

message: This Group are criminals and are Cowards end of story. --Marbus2 5 17:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Members of the group have been tried and convicted of criminal charges.  Do you have a reference for cowards? --Bejnar 20:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criminals

message: Beli Orlovi weren't organized by Vojislav Seselj or Serbian Radical Party.This formation was organized by Vuk Draskovic and Serbian Renewal Movement.This is huge mistake and I hope that somebody should fix this.Vojislav Seselj very often condemn members of Beli Orlovi during his trial in Hague.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zakipfc (talk • contribs) 00:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says that the White Eagles were formed by by Dragoslav Bokan and Mirko Jović and provides citations.  The article also provides citation to neutral, published works that link the Serbian National Renewal and the Serbian Radical Party with the formation of the White Eagles.  It also states, with citation, that Vojislav Seselj denies that linkage.  It presents the controversy in a neutral way. --Bejnar (talk) 01:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

text: If you have reliable published sources that indicate that Vuk Draskovic organized the White Eagles, please provide them. --Bejnar (talk) 01:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: They have no connection with Seselj

message: I added new information at the bottom of the article, if anyone thinks the information should be placed on a different part of the article, go ahead :). —Anna Comnena (talk) 14:44, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added new information on their reappearance
Talk:Auchmithie

message: This doesn't tell the whole story. The harbour was actually badly damaged by a sea mine after the Second World War (and even that's not the full story which involves young men and target practice but in the absence of a written account it will have to suffice). Since it was never repaired, it has slowly but surely been destroyed by the sea in the ensuing years. -- Derek Ross | Talk 17:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dilapidated harbour
Talk:Minutes to midnight

message: I changed the redirect from Doomsday Clock to Minutes to Midnight (disambiguation). Even though everything on the disambiguation page most likely got its name from the reference to the Doomsday Clock, it has become more likely that someone will be search for Minutes to Midnight looking for something other than the Doomsday Clock article. Dyingdreams 17:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also I would like to add that I am a huge Linkin Park fan, I was ten feet from the stage while they played at this year's Bamboozle Festival, and I had the self-control not to redirect the page to their new album. While it currently is likely that people searching for Minutes to Midnight on wikipedia will be looking for the album, it is pointless, if not just futile, to try to change the structure of wikipedia to compensate for the ever changing trends.Dyingdreams 17:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Delux

message: I don't like their music but one of my friends is very very close to them perhaps I could get some proofs of the statements I'm about to do.
As far as I know the group was formed in around 1995 or so. I'll ask him. The thing is that they were in 9th grade when they formed and composed their first and one of most successful songs.
 
This statement is completely false. They formed in 2000, thought the idea was conceived in 1998.  First album was recorded in 2003.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.95.234 (talk) 22:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow... they made it to Wikipedia...
Talk:Strathdon

message: All places are notable - community consensus has determined this. We should have seperate articles for the area and for the village. Alternatively, this should primarily be about the village instead of about the area, and mention that Strathdon is also in use as a descriptor for the area as a whole.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 05:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the village have a seperate article? 

message: or is this section, "Notable figures who have visited Strathdon include Sean Connery, Billy Connolly, Ewan McGregor and Queen Elizabeth II. " a little thin.  Imagine what "Notable figures who have visited New York City"would look like. Carptrash (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it just me
Talk:Malakasa

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.107.43.77 (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Eric Weatherhat

message: Can someone please go through the deletion process for this article for me? I'm about to go to sleep.JRNorbergé 09:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope not, since it would only be a waste of other people's time to nominate it. In the unlikely case it was deleted, it would reappear later.--Berig 09:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion