Talk:666 (Aphrodite's Child album)

message: "The album was ostensibly an adaptation of Biblical passages from the book of the same name"
???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.140.138.123 (talk) 13:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: I just added lots of info about 666, however I'm pretty new to updating wikipedia, so feedback & more introduction to the wikipedia culture is welcome.
I added a bit to the intro, corrections to the track list, and a Review section clearly ID'd as "someone's opinion".  Do we have an identified way to label a section as "review" and "opinion", or do we just "work it out"?  My section does have I believe a lot of info about 666 that can be considered accurate, not just opinion.
My KUDOs to Kazvorpal who started this up and continues to care about it.  IMO this is one of the greatest musical albums ever issue, even though obviously it's not for all.
:The "review" should be rewritten. It is not suitable for an encyclopedia. Why not mention the fact that Vangelis clearly owned a Mellotron? JFW | T@lk 00:33, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added lots of new info, comments? 

message: Did 3 minor changes to song titles:
The Four Horsemen
The Lamb
Hic and Nunc
These now match with my copy of the album and see, for example, allmusic.com tracklisting 
Also added album side panel - my first one so couldn't do everything I wanted - for example I wasn't sure how to upload a cover image.
OK Now uploaded cover image - I'll wait and see if it's allowed (I just scanned my own CD cover - is this OK, copyright-wise?)
: Yes, that falls under fair use. I changed the licensing tag to the image accordingly. Garion96 (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also checked with allmusic. The say Hic et Nunch though. But the backcover of my cd indeed also says Hic Et Nunc. So that must be the right one. Garion96 (talk) 15:31, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm looking at my CD right now and it definitely says HIC AND NUNC. My CD is Vertigo 838 430-2OAP boba 15:44, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, typo in my last message. Allmusic says Hic Et Nunc. My cd says hic AND nunc. So the change seems to be correct. Garion96 (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor edit to tracklisting

message: There is some kind of reed instrument used on the album. I can't make out if it is a shawm or bagpipes, but there is no mention of it in the list of personnel. 62.235.226.168 (talk) 14:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of shawm or bagpipes 

message: The release date seems to be unclear for this recording.  The fact box states the release date as June 1970, but also states that it was recorded in the period "Late 1970 – Early 1971", which suggests that the release year cannot be 1970.  Further down in the same box, in the "Chronology section", the year is given as 1972.  I also checked with allmusic.com which gives the release year as 1971.  However, other sites, e.g.  give 1972 as the release year.  I guess that 1970 must be a mistake, but does anybody have a reliable source for the release date, at least the year? --KYN (talk) 17:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: Substituted at 06:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 666 (Aphrodite's Child album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726131853/http://www.mojo4music.com/blog/2007/12/aphrodites_child.html to http://www.mojo4music.com/blog/2007/12/aphrodites_child.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified