lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James Cameron

message: Link 51 is outdated and links to a broken page. 
Change "https://ffrf.org/news/day/dayitems/item/17524-james-cameron"
to ---->
"https://ffrf.org/ftod-cr/item/17524-james-cameron" Airjustin94 (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2022 

message: I think there should be some mention (unsure whether it could be worked into an existing section of the article) of the Avatar franchise's controversial reception among Native American tribes (links: https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/22/entertainment/avatar-2-way-of-water-indigenous-boycott-cec/index.html, https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/07/why-indigenous-groups-are-boycotting-avatar-the-way-of-water.html) as well as Cameron's 2010 comments about the Lakota Nation (link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/apr/18/avatar-james-cameron-brazil-dam), as these criticisms have been widespread, well-documented, and Cameron himself has addressed accusations of racism in the franchise (link: https://www.unilad.com/film-and-tv/james-cameron-addresses-avatar-racism-accusations-477594-20221209). There was also a popular call for a boycott of Avatar: the Way of Water on Twitter (link: https://twitter.com/asdza_tlehonaei/status/1604571538409525249?s=20&t=JQBi9IMCi31FkqnEv7GY4g). Basicwhitebach (talk) 20:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: James Cameron was just on CNN with Fareed on his films. He made mention of his ideas from dreams but made No Mention of taking his ideas from the Native American people n their cultural ways. He should actually make a film on the Native Americans n their culture with nature rather than saying it’s from his dreams. 64.68.12.232 (talk) 15:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native Backlash 

message: James Cameron has been to the Titanic site 33 times (so they say), apparently with a bicycle. Nowhere is it mentioned how he went although the article on Mir (1&2) indicates it. The Deepsea Challenger has taken a total of 13 dives, although it's not clear how many Cameron experienced. Temblast (talk) 23:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to add it to . InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no Mir? 

message: There's no mention of Cameron's interest in visiting space? He spent the summer of 2000 training in Moscow, and tried to visit the ISS space station, but could only get a lift to space, not the station, so he turned down the trip. He turned down the the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, and attended their funeral service. This odd coincidence is notable and should be included.
https://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/316884/James-Cameron-trained-for-space-trip
https://www.gq.com/story/james-cameron-profile-men-of-the-year-2022
GobsPint (talk) 03:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space
Talk:Fag bomb

message: Feel free to expand this article; I'm in the midst of wedding preparations, and can't stick around to "gloss it up" past stub form. Shem(talk) 19:26, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the AP yanked the photo from circulation; again, I hadn't had time to explain it yet.  To the LGBT community, it was quite significant.  If you think it not important, put it up for a VfD, and we'll see if it survives. Shem(talk) 21:47, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For what's its worth (and, in keeping with the US military's spirit), I pre-emptively express support for keeping this article, as I remember reading of the controversy in the NYT (which article I will work to find somewhere free). Xoloz 05:29, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I live in Canada and I support it! --75.155.135.134 (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: See the AfD discussion as a first stop to look for sourcing. Sportfan5000 (talk) 10:45, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Quarry Hill Creative Center

message: Edits made keep being removed and the article made shorter. I do not understand why. Adding in references. Urge some of the information be returned to the page by someone else.
-- Mary Grace Chazan, New Jersey).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:84:8701:100:2093:90ED:E5A8:D001 (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * What I think should be changed: I think this article should be removed.
* Why it should be changed: It is fictional but put forward as fact. Therefore, it lends legitimacy to an illegitimate undertaking that has skirted zoning and public health laws in Vermont. It contains numerous false statements. For instance, renters are not provided with safe housing or hot water. It is not an artist's colony and it is not a commune. The sole purpose of this article is to continue to safeguard Quarry Hill's owner, Lyman Hall Inc, from lawsuits and to deceive public officials as to the true nature of this so-called neighborhood. The primary writer of this article is the vice president of the corporation and has edited out any other perspectives. These are all facts. Wikipedia articles should not be used in this way.
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): see Vermont Supreme Court case Fiske v. Probst and other cases both past and ongoing. 
198.55.239.113 (talk) 20:13, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 25 July 2022
Talk:Energy weapon

message: It should be noted that the Giant Mirror and Ark of the Convenant Have not been proven to have existed. Otherwise this article will look like an idiots wrote it and makes it look like they indeed did existed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.116.11  (talk • contribs) 19:43, 26 July 2005
----
How is it that electrons are not considered physical projectiles.  Also, I don't think that electromagnetic radiation is not properly considered pure energy.  The only situation that I can think of when you might project energy without projecting a physical object might be some sort of medium based wave generator; for instance a sonic weapon. Icarus Down 01:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Missa solemnis

message: It seems to me that a Missa Solemnis is pretty similar to a requiem. Should that be mentioned? Perhaps addressing how they are different as well? -R. fiend 19:52, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states that: Missa solemnis is Latin for solemn mass... [as] opposed to the more modest Missa brevis. In French, the genre is "Messe solennelle". 
But doesn't the term "Messe solennelle" refer to "Missa brevis"?! Given that the subject of the first sentence is the topic of the article (Missa solemnis), this is confusing. My suggestion: "as opposed to the more modest Missa brevis (French, "Messe solennelle").  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.222.25.211 (talk) 07:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missa brevis = Messe solennelle, not Missa solemnis?
Category talk:Discrimination

message: Hello. I'm a sometimes-user of WPedia, this is my current account (since I lost the passwords to all my previous ones due to my forgetfullness which in turn is caused by my PDD-NOS) so I'm using this account. I'd like to know how I can help with say, editing, proofreading (autistic people LOVE catching spelling errors - it's natural for us), factual corrections, or indexing... I'm Chinese American, know quite a bit about China, America, and history, and have an obsession with accuracy. How may I help out? Please reply. Thanks! --No Such Business (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How May I Help? 

message: We should merge :category:discrimination and :category:prejudice and :category:prejudices into :category:prejudice and discrimination, otherwise we'll be basically repeating the same list twice. --Sonjaaa 20:10, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
:I'm in support of that, as most articles are double-categorized even now. --Trickstar 22:06, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree its more organized and less confusing. Artaxiad 02:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As well, it sidesteps the issues of NPOV and the negative connotations present in Discrimination, but less-so in prejudice. Bakkster Man (talk) 00:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: I have added a format for see also in the four categories placed one level down as follows:
navigation:
 
Perhaps a suitable location for a hub discussion for this could be Category talk:Prejudice and discrimination  Gregkaye (talk) 15:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: Albinos inTanzania see BBC horribleWikidgood (talk) 22:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request add  

message: How is Anti-Communism a form of discrimination?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.101.89 (talk) 07:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Communism is discrimination? 

message: It's also under the parent category 'Prejudice and discrimination'. Should it be under both? The racism page is in this category. Whyme943 (talk) 06:58, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the racism category be under this? 

message: I restored the Human rights category. Discrimination is a topic in human rights. Many abhorrent practices of discrimination certainly are human rights abuses but the whole topic does not belong in this category. Whizz40 (talk) 09:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human rights 

message: Is it worth considering a merger with the related category? Thoughts? Many thanks! KnowTheManyHistories (talk) 22:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Category: Prejudice and discrimination?
Category talk:Prejudices

message: We should merge :category:discrimination and :category:prejudice and :category:prejudices into :category:prejudice and discrimination, otherwise we'll be basically repeating the same list twice. --Sonjaaa 20:12, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
*I think the contents of :category:prejudices should be moved into :category:discrimination, and there should also be a List of prejudices, since that is all that :category:prejudices is. -- Reinyday, August 5, 2005
*the whole category structure of bigotry, prejudice, racism, discrimination, etc. needs to be reorganized. Gzuckier 19:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

message: We should merge :category:discrimination and :category:prejudice and :category:prejudices into :category:prejudice and discrimination, otherwise we'll be basically repeating the same list twice. --Sonjaaa 20:12, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
*[Neither- wants merger but addition=modified separation+merge=ambiguous vote.]I think the contents of :category:prejudices should be moved into :category:discrimination, and there should also be a List of prejudices, since that is all that :category:prejudices is. -- Reinyday, August 5, 2005
*[Neither-no clear vote]the whole category structure of bigotry, prejudice, racism, discrimination, etc. needs to be reorganized. Gzuckier 19:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional analysis

message: I have added a format for see also in the four categories placed one level down as follows:
navigation:
 
Perhaps a suitable location for a hub discussion for this could be Category talk:Prejudice and discrimination  Gregkaye (talk) 15:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: I am restoring the :Category:Majority–minority relations.  Prejudice can be found in almost all power relationships between both racial and ethnic populations where the dominate race or ethnicity is a majority in the population while lesser power races and ethnicities are a minority. See the article on Prejudice.  Thus, the category is apt. Meclee (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoring category
Talk:Ben Curtis (actor)

message: Surprised no mention has been made about the drunken appearance he made with Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, which is on a DVD. It is mentioned at the tail end of this interview with Robert Smigel at Salon.com RoyBatty42 02:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Drunk Appearance with Triumph

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- HornandsoccerTalk 21:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: It looks like Ben is also doing Applebee's ads. Watch the waiter with the sizzling platters. "Works every time."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihJqUpS6EaE  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Batavian (talk • contribs) 00:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applebee's 

message: Ben smoked a bit of weed 15 years ago. It was reported in reliable sources. I have removed it per WP:BLP and WP:HARM. Edward Mordake (talk) 18:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weed
Talk:Revco

message: Wow. That image of the service entrance really adds something to the article. Brings back memories of smoking a joint out back on my morning breaks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.86.248.1 (talk) 00:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Door

message: If someone could find/add the Revco logo and/or a picture of an interior of a store, that would be great.69.134.50.153 20:16, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Does anyone have photos of a "standard" Revco store? We presently have two photos of a Revco that was converted from a movie theater(!), but we have no photos of a Revco in a building or facility that was designed for Revco from the get-go. Such an image would be highly beneficial. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:17, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos?
Talk:List of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill alumni

message: I think John T. Lupton II should be on this list. BillVol (talk) 19:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. Anyone with a Wikipedia article and citations proving UNC affiliation can be added. Rublamb (talk) 01:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Grad means they went to graduate school at UNC Rublamb (talk) 01:11, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  John T. Lupton II 
Talk:Bruce Levy

message: I can't find a source for the life and times of Sir Bruce that's less than 40-odd years old (i.e. back when he was alive).  Thus, I've got no idea when he died (if he died ... he could be undead, lurking around golf courses, waiting for someone to mess up his wonderful greens).  That's probably a black mark against his significance right there, but less important people from other nations have fallen through the cracks, so why not let the Kiwis have their mome in the sun?  --MarkGallagher 20:32, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Photograph should be added from a source with a free license, if available 
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on research should be expanded and references required
*References should be expanded, and preferably converted to inline format
*External link present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 18:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Moscow State Institute of International Relations

message: What is the source for saying that any of these two schools are in the top two?  And according to which criteria?  This article does not reflect well on MGIMO.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.132.242.1 (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: World's top two school

message: -How Much Watch?
-Six Watch.
-Such much?
-Whom how.
-MGIMO finish?
-Ask!
24.87.0.238 09:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Joke

message: I fixed the link for the university professor which redirected to the Russian version of Wikipedia.
(Eddie 00:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect link

message: There is a statement in the lead:
:it is usually considered common knowledge in post-USSR countries that, at least during the USSR times, admission to MGIMO was mostly reserved to children of the Party and government nomenklatura). Even today, admission to MGIMO is reserved for the children of top government official and oligarchs
It should be referred and probably restated in a weaker form. E.g. my x-wife's brother has graduated from MGIMO although he is certainly not a child of an oligarch nor of a government figure nor even an exceptionally good secondary school student. Alex Bakharev (talk) 10:26, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resereved for tops government figures and oligarchs? 

message: The article originally read:
:MGIMO is the only university in the world listed in the Guinness Book of Records – it is named the only educational establishment teaching 53 foreign languages full-time.
This is, of course, incorrect. MGIMO is NOT the only university in the world listed in the Guinness Book of Records. I revised this to
:According to the Guinness Book of Records, MGIMO teaches 53 full time languages during every academic term, the most in any academic institution.
This edit, however, was reverted, for reasons not specified. I am open to other ways of phrasing the fact that, according to GBR, MGIMO teaches more languages 'full-time' (whatever that means) than any other 'academic institution' (whatever that means) in the world. Please do not simply revert this correction; discuss here if you see any problem with it. Rgr09 (talk) 13:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of languages taught 

message: The History section of the article is a very close paraphrase of this webpage. It needs revision to avoid issues of WP:CV and WP:NPOV. Rgr09 (talk) 15:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with history section 

message: Did no one have the balls to call it out? No "Criticism" section? No "Factory of dictators, oligarchs and supremacists" section? Just a German prankster whose jokes will disappear like all the anti-war & anti-Putin demonstrators do: without delay & discussion? Shame on Wikipedia. Arminden (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dangerous wasps nest? No?
Talk:Lady Zhurong/Archive 1

message: Historically, I thought that Zhu Rong was the ONLY woman to fight alongside the men during battle. If she wasnt fighting, then how was she captured? Another bio that i read stated that she dueled Zhao Yun and Wei Yan before being captured. Zhu Rong's skills were said to have challenged her husbands, she was said to have been an expert knife thrower. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.11.119 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't there be a separate article on Zhu Rong the fire god, as well? --Xastic 04:36, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?
Talk:Ross Lightfoot

message: This probably needs clarification, regarding the comments about Aboriginals being at the bottom of the civilization spectrum. He was referring to their state at "the time of settlement" or somesuch. Someone reading this page could be lead to believe he was referring to the present day.
I've removed this possibility and added a source for the comments. What else do people think needs sourcing before the poor sourcing tag can be removed? Hegar 03:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Grinling Gibbons

message: Just a note to avoid confusion:
*In 1691/93 Gibbons carved the altar for the chapel of Trinity College, Oxford
*Around 1691-1695 he also carved decorations for the Wren Library of Trinity College, Cambridge
There also seems to be a number of other significant events that could do with mentioning (these need checking)
*Decoration for Chatsworth House
*the ceiling for a room at Petworth House
*Carvings in the Great Hall of Blenheim Palace (1716)
-- Solipsist 20:41, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note of some carvings 

message: Is it worth having a category "Buildings bearing Grinling Gibbons carvings"? Pseudomonas(talk) 19:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category for his work? 

message: Why no mention of him being famous for incorporating pea pods into his carvings? - Just that this is the only thing I already knew about him beforehand! Invulgo (talk) 08:37, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no mention of him being famous for incorporating pea pods into his carvings?
Talk:English Settlement (an album)

message: #redirect English Settlement
Can someone delete this redirect page? I wanted to move the pages around so that English settlement would be the disambiguation page, and the album and the settlement would be on an equal footing, thus restoring some kind of neutrality in the naming of these articles. Unfortunately, I'd forgotten that moving a page doesn't clean it away, but leaves a grimy residue which just can't be got rid of.... Bill (talk) 19:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Six flags over Texas

message: Does this actually need its own article?  I've been considering redirecting it to History of Texas for a while now.  History of Texas already lists the countries that governed Texas, and I think a bit of expansion there about the slogan would probably be good enough.   Another alternative would be to rename it History of the Texas flag and discuss the flags instead of the countries and Texas history.  As it stands, though, it's essentially a watered-down version of History of TexasKaranacs (talk) 18:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is.  The history of Texas is directly linked to these Six Flags.  There are histories of the Flag of the United States, Flags of the Confederate States of America, the Flag of Denmark, all the Flags of the U.S. states, and City flags.  All these are part of the history of these entities, and deserve their own article.  I'm working on completing the history of these flags, and trying to keep it at the point that it just whets the appetite, rather than being the end all, be all of the History of Texas.  Leobold1 (talk) 00:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's actually the history of the flags, with a bit of Texas history thrown in as background, then I think this would be a very useful article (though should possibly be renamed).  If it focuses too much on the history of the territory and not the flags themselves, then I think it would be redundant.  Good luck!  Karanacs (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's my plan.  See Six flags over Texas#Flag of the Republic of Rio Grande as a basic outline.  Some may go two paragraphs, but that's my limit at this time.   Eventually, I want this upgraded to at least Good Article status, but that's in the future.  Leobold1 (talk) 20:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article content

message: :::It appears that the Northern parts of Texas were part of the Louisiana Territory. So that means Northern Texas was owned by France from when they took it over from Spain in 1800 until 1803 when France sold it to the US. The French Tricolor flag could be put on the page. My sources are from some maps of the Spanish and French Louisiana territories. --24.147.1.197 (talk) 17:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Northern Texas part of Louisiana

message: The actual phrase
"six flags over Texas" seems to originate with the amusement park in 1961. However, the mosaic with six flags in the capitol dates to 1936. What about the 6 seals on the capitol facade? Where and when did the tendency to display the 6 flags emerge? One suspects it was always a cheeky way to normalize the confederate flag.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:500:4FC5:B8F8:3DF5:48E8:240C (talk) 22:04, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: Where is the Spanish flag on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Under_six_flags,_Alamo,_San_Antonio,_Texas.jpg ? --189.217.89.14 (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish flag over the Álamo