lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sugammadex

message: Any preliminary phase 3 data available for sharing? Mdw346 15:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Phase III data

message: Started a wiki subject page "Selective Relaxant Binding Agent" and a discussion page. It could use help and maybe a link from "SRBA" in this article. Good idea? Thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdw346 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selective Relaxant Binding Agent 

message: I'm translating this page to catalan wikipedia and I'm unable to find it in Commons (Sugammadex encaps rocuronium.jpg). Where is it? How can I get it? Replay to: http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuari:Tabalot Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.58.137.14 (talk) 20:11, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is "Sugammadex encaps rocuronium.jpg" image?
Talk:Irving Howe

message: Does one really need to explain, publicly or otherwise, why one might want to change one's name from Horenstein????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.87.248.162 (talk) 01:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of name comment

message: His works are listed with capitalization patterns more European than American.  Is this his preference, how he refered to his works?  75.252.26.1 (talk) 00:51, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I’m surprised no one has commented on this since 2011. The capitalization is very irregular. It is the sentence-style capitalization specified by APA guidelines specifically for use references, but not in the main body of the work. This doesn’t seem to me to be appropriate for a list of works contained in the main body of the article. I’m going to make the formatting of his works a chore of mine, unless anyone speaks up to protest this. Neighborhood Nationalist (talk) 01:40, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Styling of titles of works 

message: If not, I would remove ethnicity from the lede per MOS. --Malerooster (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the obvious connection, but was wondering if it rose to the level worthy of inclusion in the lede sentence. Thank you, --Malerooster (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, he wrote an award winning book, "World of Our Fathers", about the experiences of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in New York City in the early 20th Century.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.54.132.58 (talk) 04:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Howe wrote several books about the experience of American and immigrant Jews, an example of which is his edited work, Jewish American Stories, so indeed his ethnicity has played a role in his notability. Neighborhood Nationalist (talk) 01:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was being Jewish part of the subject's notability? 

message: Howe's son was born in Princeton.  That implies that Howe lived and worked there, but there's nothing the article about that; in fact his academic career seems to get short shrift.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.54.132.58 (talk) 04:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Princeton?
Talk:2007 European Tour

message: I would like to make this a redirect to European Tour for now as it largely duplicates the 2007 schedule there, and current year results for other tours are covered in their main articles. Only one person edited this in a substantial way and even though he is still editing daily he hasn't touched this for weeks. Mowsbury 22:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Prophet Entertainment

message: This whole page reads like a press release, meaning at best its fanboy-ism, and at worst, plagiarism. Sort it out or delete it. Pennywisepeter 15:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed the contents of that section with a copyvio tag and listed it on Wikipedia:Copyright_problems.  So, there you go. -- BillWeiss | Talk 03:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 
Talk:Nullity (transreal)

message: I think the first step is to find what the proof is of this concept, show the derivation, and then get some math people in here to comment on if its valid or not. I'm not seeing this reported anywhere else and I havn't found a document that describes whats actually being done here. Harley peters 16:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first reference link is to a pdf containing the axioms of transreal arithmetic. I'm reading through it now, but it's early and my mind isn't quite up to speed. He says something about the consistency of these axioms being proved, which just cannot be true (per Goedel). I'll have to get back to you. --King Bee 16:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: if i'm reading it right, nullity is not used for any division by 0, only the special case of 0/0. all other divisions by zero have been mapped to positive or negative infinity. i'm going to read through the paper again before editing the wiki page though. also, i'm not sure which exact symbol he's using for nullity (ɸ or Φ?). --Frank duff 17:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?? 

message: I think that rather than an article strictly about nullity, we should fold this content into an article generically about transreal numbers. The concept of nullity is hardly understandable outside of the context of that number system, and there's not really enough content to this concept to give it its own article. Eliot 17:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. Plus, we need serious sources (as in, a peer-reviewed journal or a conference, not the BBC) otherwise this is just a hoax. Sam Hocevar 17:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Transreal number]]s
Talk:Târgoviște

message: Shouldn't the :category:Inclined towers go in Chindia Tower?
Does anyone know why there is Targovishte in Wallachia as well as in Bulgaria?
:It means "marketplace" in Slavic languages. СЛУЖБА (talk) 03:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclined tower 

message: : The city was first founded during the period of the Second Bulgarian Empire in the 12th century
This is not referenced and I think that even if we find a reference, it would be just pure speculation: there's no epigraphical and no archeological evidence of this being true. bogdan (talk) 19:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Bulgarian Empire 

message: : It is derived from the Bulgarian word for marketplace "търговище" () and the city's name is phonetically entirely identical to it.
Actually, it's not pronounced "phonetically entirely identical" (tɨrɡoviʃte != tərgoviʃtɛ), but that's besides the point. The name is derived from Common Slavic spoken by the Slavic locals, not from Bulgarian. 
The language was probably some kind of South Slavic dialect, but naming it "Bulgarian" would be anachronistic. bogdan (talk) 16:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulgarian language
Talk:John Williams (actor)

message: A fairly minor point, but it appears the automated script you ran on this article during your recent edit altered a verbatim FamilySearch citation from "New York, New York Passenger and Crew Lists" to "New York City Passenger and Crew Lists" – which is not actually faithful to the original source. --Muzilon (talk) 15:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Muzilon. We get only very occasional issues given the amount of script work that occurs. But, does it actually affect the functionality of the link? I just wonder whether there's any downside at all to avoiding the repeated jingle here. Tony (talk)  04:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nope, the actual URL wasn't altered. I did take the liberty of changing the text of the title back to its original form though. Muzilon (talk) 06:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problem! Thanks for your detailed attention. Tony (talk)  06:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Script over-riding verbatim citation? 
Template talk:Test2del

message: The notes on this template state "You can optionally supply a single parameter, which is the name of the page to which the template applies. If provided, this page will be cited in the warning."  This is not the case.  The below code when placed before the first period will implement this function.

--Pascal666 16:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks for spotting that – Gurch 14:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, forgot the comma.  The center of that should have been "|, as" so that the space does not go away.  Sorry.  --Pascal666 22:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Femto 16:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parameter
Talk:Sheep dip

message: If some commonly used sheep dips are highly toxic to humans, who can be contaminated by skin contact with it, then why don't the sheep suffer similar ill effects?  The sheep are fully immersed in the sheep dip, so their area of external skin contact would be around 100 per cent, and that contact would presumably remain high for some time thereafter so that the dip will perform its function.  If the toxic chemicals can pass through human skin, then it seems probably that it would also pass through sheep skin.  Further, are the sheep prevented from ingesting the toxic dip during their immersion in it?  
Is it safe to consume the meat or dairy products of sheep that have been dipped in toxic dip?  Are those sheep products tested for presence of the specific toxic chemicals?  How is the dipped sheep's wool cleansed of the toxic sheep dip before being made into clothing intended to cover the skin of humans?
216.66.97.2 16:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  how is toxicity dealt with? 

message: :wikt:sheep-dip shows there is a homonym (or homophone with respect to the hyphen) with a vastly different meaning. I'm not sure if we can create a disambiguation hatnote to a Wiktionary article. If not, I don't see any way of giving readers a heads-up about this situation as we don't seem to have an article discussing this other phenomenon. Perhaps some mention could be entered into the shill article? __meco (talk) 13:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intel practice 

message: Why is the main picture what it is when the first paragraph of History then explains that it's not actually sheep-dipping? Make the second picture the main one, or use a picture of modern sheep-dipping.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aldrenean (talk • contribs) 08:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First picture contradicted by second section?
Talk:Velikoe v malom i antikhrist

message: The table of contents has been translated by User:Alex Bakharev - who has also made a table of it. I reproduce it here. Yours truly,--Ludvikus 06:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Table of Contents

message:  Yours truly,--Ludvikus 21:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I hope someone (a Wikipedia) will help me develop the article at least around the Table of Contents so as to give the reader a better understanding of the Russian context in which the infamous Chapter XII was placed by Serge Nilus--Ludvikus 00:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Serge Nilus]]'s Orthodox Religious Context of the [[Protocols of Zion]]

message: First, a part of the title ("как близкая политическая возможность") is missing. Second, since this is Englsih WP and the title is not notable, I think this article should be renamed into something like Great in Small. Antichrist As a Close Political Possibility. Of course the current title would stay as a redirect. I imagine that the current title looks quite gibberish to non-Russian speakers. ←Humus sapiens ну? 01:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No! Absolutely not. We should keep the transliterated title. It occurs in the libraries on their library cards. Nevertheless, I speek fluently a related Slovik language - Polish. That helps me translate (as opposed to transliterate) the Russian. The nearest English language translation, in my opinion is the following: The Great within the Small and Antichrist. BUT THE WHOLE 419 PAGE BOOK HAS NEVER BEEN TRANSLATED IN TOTAL! So why should you translate the title now? --Ludvikus 07:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal 

message: There has been a question as to whether this text is the 2nd or 3rd edition of the work - irrespective of the presence of The Protocols. The world's authority on its author, Michael Hagemeister, maintains that until the 1960's it was believed that the 1905 edition was actually the third edition of Velikoe v malom. For example, some believed that there was a 1901 edition which was the first edition. The current scholarly view is that the 1st edition was published in 1903, and that there never was an edition published in 1901 - to the disappointment of millenarian, I might add. --Ludvikus 00:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Michael Hagemeister]] on the Second vs. the Third edition(s) 

message: That's the orthodox saint associated with the convent/monastery about which our Nilus writes. --Ludvikus 19:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Seraphim of Sarov]] 

message: An editor has claimed that it's not a plagiarism. Apparently he's unaware of Philip Grave's disconery in 1921 that it's the taking of Maurice Joly's Dialogue in Hell ... --Ludvikus 06:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Plagiarism]]
Talk:Seitsemän veljestä

message: I cannot figure it out. from fi-wiki, ":fi:Jukola" appears to be the name of the manor they live. In some google traslations the brothers are called "Jukkola's brothers" and in books I see they are called " brothers from Jukola". - Altenmann >talk 19:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that Aleksis Kivi didn't give them a surname. The novel is set in the early 19th century, and many Finnish peasants didn't have surnames back then. See this related article in the  magazine. See also Finnish surname. --JAAqqO (talk) 00:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I am asking in relation to Jukola relay page. I made the following change, but then I decided to double-check and undid my change. So, from what you are saying, my edit was correct and I have to restore it, right? - Altenmann >talk 01:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the family name of the brothers?
Talk:Kevin McDonald (bishop)

message: : This was written by me on www.catholicassociation.co.uk and is my copyright, which I have included on Wikipedia for all to read. 213.86.156.129 14:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: E-mail sent to get this page put back - (c) lies with myself and the Catholic Association. 213.86.156.129 14:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Per WP:PRIME, I've proposed that the comedian currently at Kevin McDonald is not clearly the most notable of the various Kevn McDonalds and that therefore it should be moved to make way for the page currently at Kevin McDonald (disambiguation).
Please chime in at Talk:Kevin_McDonald#Requested move. Thanks. --Dweller (talk) 16:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move discussion 
Talk:TDC Holding A/S

message: TDC A/S → TDC Tele Danmark — WP:NCCORP User:Philaweb 19:17, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you explain?--Kotniski (talk) 10:42, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:List of people from California

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.168.102.111 (talk) 02:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about how people live in the Santa Clarita Valley? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Benjamin Epicure and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 7#Benjamin Epicure until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Whpq (talk) 18:39, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Benjamin Epicure" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Using the word "notable" in titles brings a lot more clarity. If someone would be willing to put in the work to move them all, that would be great... For instance, List of people from Los Angeles -> List of notable people from Los Angeles... Amyipdev (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move all the CA subpages to use "notable"
Talk:Heraclius Constantine

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 15:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Constantine III (Byzantine emperor) →  – The name used for this emperor varies from source to source. While either Constantine III or Heraclius Constantine is typically used as a title, both names are also most often mentioned. DIR uses either depending on the article: 1, 2; Britannica and Livius use Constantine III; the PLRE, the ODB, Metropolitan Museum of Art and British Museum use Heraclius Constantine. Other published scholarly sources also vary in which name is used: Constantine III (1, 2, 3 - Foss (2015) mentions some more but it was actually difficult for me to find sources here), Heraclius Constantine (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). Because it's interesting to note, numismatists appear to universally favour Heraclius Constantine: 1, 2, 3, 4.
The biggest reason for this move request is that there are two Roman emperors numbered as Constantine III: this one and the usurper-turned-recognised co-emperor Claudius Constantinus of the 5th century. This has been noted as confusing even in academia (link). It's impossible to determine with full certainty which name is used more for this emperor. Using Google Ngrams, Constantine III appears to win out massively (link), but keep in mind that the results for "Constantine III" also include those of the western emperor, as well as the six other figures often given this name and number (see Constantine III). Books using "Constantine III" seem to mostly either be really old or to be referring to the western emperor (link) and most papers using that name also appear to be referring to the western emperor - though this is also likely because the western emperor is a more relevant historical figure.
Even if "Constantine III" was to be more common, and even though the disambiguations "(Western Roman emperor)" and "(Byzantine emperor)" allows differentiation between the two imperial Constantine III:s, WP:QUALIFIER says that it is preferrable to go with "an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title", if possible, to avoid disambiguation with parantheses. I think 'Heraclius Constantine' is a clear case of that. Ichthyovenator (talk) 14:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 August 2021
Talk:Whip Jones

message: When searching for Whip Jones online, one must remember that much of his accomplishments occured prior to the digital word.  When searching on google try these variations.  These links search to Google and ghits as of 12/19/2001:
* Whipple Van Ness Jones 54
* Whipple V. N. Jones 174
* Whipple V.N. Jones 174  
* Whipple Jones 1,140
* Whip Jones 1,230
* Whipple "Whip" Jones 153
* "Whip Jones" Highlands 158
* "Whip Jones" Highland 100
- BMcCJ 16:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Names and Google Searching 

message: Because of the AfD discussion, I suggest considering the following articles and if appropriate improving the main article by quoting and citing these.  If you see something that would really enhance the main article, please cut/paste/cite as appropriate.  We can remove this discussion later, after the AfD (each article has the link to the original source:
* Also, here is a link to the an early version of the page.  There may be some snippets here to include and reference as well.  I'm really trying to give some "soul" to this biography.   early version  Warning:  only cut/paste from this old one, saving it will overwrite the current/live version.
-BMcCJ
69.19.14.26 02:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Biographies Online
Talk:A96 road

message: As far as I'm aware - and according to CBRD - the Fochabers bypass is complete. Why was this removed from the page?
I don't think work has even started on the bypass. Fraslet 17:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bawu

message: Needs etymology. Badagnani (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Sharon Horgan

message: I don't have the ability but this page really needs a filmography box with her various roles (plus writing etc).
--gobears87 (talk) 12:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography? 

message: Though largely raised in Ireland, she was born in the UK. I understand she also holds New Zealand citizenship. The NZ issue aside, is she not British by virtue of birthplace? Hanoi Road (talk) 10:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe you're right. Since she was born in the UK, prior to 1983, the UK automatically considers her a citizen (unless either of two very specific paternal criteria were met, both of which sound highly unlikely in Sharon's case). Of course, it's a different story as to whether she acknowledges that UK recognition, or whether she has ever acted upon it to get a UK passport. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find anything in WP:BLP or elsewhere as to how this should be handled in an article. 75.82.109.6 (talk) 16:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 