Talk:Tibetan culture

message: This article's section of Clothing and Customs is seriously lacking. There's also no external links of any kind.
66.168.129.5 20:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds interesting, but it's not required. HanBoN (talk) 01:08, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Don't worry about it. If it bothers you I'd be quite happy to take pictures and upload them. --Gimme danger (talk) 05:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Tibetan civilization boasts a rich culture." This sound like a bit of quackery. POV? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs  04:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by "quackery"? The sentence is a generic lead-in; I've yet to encounter a culture not described as "rich". Chinese culture gets the uncited adjective "complex", if fairness is the issue. --Gimme danger (talk) 08:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I do not really see the POV here, and if there is POV, then I will tag every other cultural article because they basically fallow the same pattern. I have yet to see an article that demotes a culture. In either case it is too short, so within the day or so I will provide a better intro.--PikachuGyeong (talk) 01:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV concerns

message: ::@ བྱམས་པ་བློལྡན: Can you please explain your changes on the talk page? Because  you remove material that is referenced, pictures that are good, explicit and had been in article for long time. Hafspajen (talk) 14:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you please explain your changes in the article on the talk page? Because  you remove material that is referenced, pictures that are good, explicit and had been in article for long time. You removed the lead picture twice. We don't want that you remove that. Hafspajen (talk) 21:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: * Wikipedia:I just don't like it is not a reason to remove things. Hafspajen (talk) 23:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Tibetan culture is depicted as backwards and inferior to other cultures. I think this needs to be changed. Especially the first picture (and others) don't really show the beauty of Tibetan culture as the pictures of other sites on the topic of cultures of countries do. Then there are way too many pictures in this article. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a childrens book. But I have to admit that pictures offer a good view on the topic. The introduction is too long and goes to much into detail. This should be explained later in the article and not at the start. --བྱམས་པ་བློལྡན་ (talk) 13:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

text: Can't really agree on this one. I don't think it is depicted as backwards and inferior to other cultures at all, I don't think the leed is to long. PLEASE WAIT until your changes are DISCUSSED; for god's sake.         Hafspajen (talk) 13:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

text: '  - somebody please explain how wikipedia is edited. Hafspajen (talk) 13:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New changes

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tibetan culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080220130752/http://www.kagyuoffice.org/mainseats.tsurphu.html to http://www.kagyuoffice.org/mainseats.tsurphu.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927201631/http://www.indiemerchstore.com/sft/item.php?id=2330 to http://www.indiemerchstore.com/sft/item.php?id=2330
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: please explain why you think this article is unbalanced. By the way, how come you know this template? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 21:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: --I believe the article is unbalanced because it does not talk about the endangerment of Tibetan culture, but simply focuses on Tibetan culture coming out because of chinese help, a point some would believe to be untrue. This especially shows in the Performing arts section. I learned that template message by googling it. Sam-2727 (talk) 23:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see your point; thanks. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbalanced 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  23:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem