lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Queen's Guard/archive1

message: On the page, it correctly lists the Royal 22e Régiment of Canada as having mounted the King's/Queen's Guard, however further on the page, it incorrectly stipulates that only two Commonweath units (RCMP and Lord Strathcona's Horse) having mounted the Guard in London. 
The Van Doos mounted the Guard in London in 1940, as refernced in the Wikipedia article about that unit.
:Your comments is more likely to be spotted and dealt with at the article's talk page - Talk:Queen's Guard. HTH.-- ALoan (Talk) 20:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anson Morrill

message: The article says that Morill was the candidate of a breakaway faction of the Democrats who were against the Maine Law. But this article says that the anti-Maine Law Democrats took control of the Convention and Morill was the candidate of the pro-Temperance faction. This would make sense, considering his alliance with the Know-Nothings and Free Soilers. Could someone confirm this? 2604:3D08:777C:C00:15F3:12ED:25D7:39C0 (talk) 18:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Maine Law?
Talk:Ansumane Mané

message: The sources used for the birth date are perfectly reliable, both are from academic publishers. Stop removing them based on presumption. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Ansumane Mane. It can be questioned whether these sources are reliable for this detail. Andrew Dalby 12:28, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources being removed 
Talk:MS Scandinavian Star

message: Hi,
the chronology and number of fires is confused.
It begins with a fire (so you think there was 1) which turns out to be the second , then goes to the first (so you think there were 2). Later on somebody dies in a fire before the first two (so now you think there were 3), and in the end six fires have been mentioned (but by now you've gotten a bit sceptical).
T 88.89.219.147 (talk) 01:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree (though I think "somebody dies in a fire before the first two (so now you think there were 3)" actually should be "somebody dies in fire 24 hours before a certain fire was started (so now you think there were 3)". Facts are confusing and disputed, but that does not mean the article has to be this inconsistent.--Nø (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire/s? 

message: If someone could find a picture of the MS Scandinavian Star for this article and maybe the St. Petersburg Port article that would be helpful!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adog104 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Antero Soriano

message: It looks like this material was likely copy/pasted from one or more other sources. I've done some basic wiki-formatting, but it needs to be edited to be sure it is not simply a copy/paste, and hopefully not from a non-public domain source. --lquilter 12:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this looks infringing to me. Seems to be copied and pasted from the cited GeoCities page (which is archived here). Here is the edit that introduced the infringing text: the sole edit of an anonymous user, no edit comment, no assertion of permission. As is the protocol for blatant copyright violations, which this appears to be, I am immediately removing the infringing text, which is the entirety of the "Biography" section. —Caesura(t) 16:12, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: editing
Talk:Anthony Cary, 5th Viscount Falkland

message: See this page move from 2006.  I also note the following:
* Theoretically all viscountcies in the Peerage of Scotland have "of" in their titles, but most Scottish Viscounts have dropped the practice of using "of." The only ones who persist in the usage of the word are the Viscount of Arbuthnott, and, to a lesser extent, the Viscount of Oxfuird.
So, why is this guy "Viscount of Falkland", while all his predecessors and successors are just "Viscount Falkland"? Should not the "of" be either applied to all the Falkland viscounts (on technical grounds) or to none of them (on practical grounds)?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does he alone have "of" in his title?
Talk:Anthony Colve

message: I used as my main source the article  . This is available on the Project Muse site, which is normally not open "to the public". I discovered, however, that the site is accessible to "veteran Wikipedians" via The Wikipedia Library. It was the first time I used this "privilege" in the service of editing a Wikipedia article. Highly Recommended. Ereunetes (talk) 23:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the Anikin article contained a number of serious errors (date of transfer of power in New York was the most egregious one) which I corrected after reading the Shomette and Haslach book. But the biographical data are correct. Ereunetes (talk) 00:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Confronting the several different sources I used was an interesting experience. At first I leaned rather heavily on Anikin, but that proved a mistake when I discovered O'Callaghan and Fernow's compilation of documents, on which Anikin claimed to base his narrative. But on closer inspection it turned out that the documents in the latter compilation did not support some of Anikin's rather negative comments on Colve's administration. So I deleted a number of comments I had based on his narrative. Anikin also professes to have read Shomette and Haslach, but apparently did not profit from that knowledge. He could have used many of the facts I borrowed from the latter book. In any case, I hope the article now corrects a number of errors in wide circulation, like the claim that Colve was a "naval captain". He was nothing of the sort, but a representative of that recent invention, the Dutch Marine (the corps had only been founded on 10 December 1665, so it was just seven years old in 1672.) The landing on Manhattan on 30 July 1673 was therefore one of the earliest exploits of the Corps. Though the contribution of the Corps during the Battle of Texel of 21 August 1673 is better known. Ereunetes (talk) 20:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the main source, an article "behind a pay wall"
Talk:Anthony Denny

message: In the article it says: "Sometime before 1548, Anthony married Joan Champernowne, sister to Katherine Ashley, the governess of the future Queen Elizabeth I. They had 12 children". Since it's also stated that Denny died in 1549, it seems a bit strange. Of course "Sometime before 1548" could mean anytime before that, (or maybe they had lots of kids prior to getting married) but still, years + number of kids don't really add up. Does anyone have access to sources that would allow us to check dates and number of children? /--Idunius (talk) 08:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since CHAMPERNOWNE (the link provided in the article) states they were married in 1525, I'll change the date in the article. --Idunius (talk) 12:41, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many children in how many years?
Talk:Sir Anthony Esmonde, 15th Baronet

message: Why would this article be sorted in some categories under "Esmonde, Anthony" and others as "Anthony, Osmond"?
I have entered the first as the "default key" and left the others in place in case there is some interesting esoteric reason for the difference.
Unless any such turns up, I'll come back in a bit and change those also.
HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 12:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category sort-key
Talk:Stoll Field/McLean Stadium

message: It simply MUST be explained how Transylvania either scored three-quarters of a point, or conversely was penalized a quarter-point.  2600:1004:B101:C987:48C3:3F37:C4EA:5612 (talk) 23:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1880 Transylvania score
Talk:A. J. Mundella

message: Should there be a link to this? Jackiespeel (talk) 17:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mundella papers
Talk:Anthony Nutting

message: I have raised a citation need against the statement he was discharged from the Leicestershire Yeomanry because of a steeplechase accident, because his biography in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, article by Nigel Nicolson (who was a parliamentary colleague who shared his views on the Suez issue and also came to an early end in his Commons career), states he was discharged because of asthma with no mention of an accident. The same ODNB article also states he joined the Yeomanry before the outbreak of WWII; certainly had he joined at the outbreak (September 1939) and been invalided "a year later" (generally assumed to mean at least 12 months) then it would have been too late for him to see diplomatic service in Paris before the Fall of France. I will populate the article with ODNB information in due course.Cloptonson (talk) 19:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Discharge from army

message: The statement he was the youngest member of Winston Churchill's Government after World War II is historically misleading. Nutting was not in the Caretaker Government that followed the end of the war in Europe and Churchill was defeated at the next General Election before the war with Japan ended in 1945. Churchill did not return to government until 1951, so I would consider it too late after World War II to accept the statement as it is.Cloptonson (talk) 19:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "youngest member of Winston Churchill's government after World War II"
Talk:Anthony Rosenroll

message: * A grandmother of myne was a Rosenroll. She lived in Thusis, Switzerland. Because there do no more live any Rosenrolls in Europe, id would be from interest, wether the Canadian Rosenroll are descendents of those from Thusis. In Thusis, the Rosenrolls were aristocrats and had a castle, which is still used. If You have any infromation about the origin of the Canadian Rosenroll, please let us know this!--83.176.63.65 15:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yes, Anthony Rosenroll was descended from the Thusis Rosenrolls, they who owned the castle.  A little more information on that can be found here. Steve Smith (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anton Christian Bang

message: That's your name and logo all in one neat package. - Richfife (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  If you're starting a punk band... 
Wikipedia talk:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 September 12

message: User:Boscovic and User:...And Beyond! were blocked  and then 7 hours later, your account User:TDL31 was created at .  You, as User:TDL31 immediately go to work removing the sockpuppet notices for User:Boscovic and User:...And Beyond!.  That is good enough evidence for me to strongly suspect that you are a sock. 
WP:Sock defines abusive use of socks to include casting multiple votes on a single issue.  You did so, for example at :Category:Christian mathematicians here and here  --BostonMA 20:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Boscovic]], [[User:...And Beyond!]] and [[User:TDL31]]
Talk:Antonín Zápotocký

message: " He was released in 1945, but the Netherlands demanded his extradition on the suspicions of his participation in executions of Dutch citizens." 
So? Was he guilty? What happened about this? The man went on to the top political offices of the country! Was it mistaken identity? Did he confess to being involved? How can an allegation like this be raised for such a prominent person without more being said? 69.125.134.86 (talk) 01:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch killings
Talk:Linguasphere Observatory

message: Instead of having two stubs, I'm taking the initiative to merge both to here. CJLippert (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging articles

message: Linguasphere is obviously something new in the world of linguistics. It appears to be a massive effort. It has its own terminology. The high-level work is already done. What we don't have is the complete map for all the language groups. And, I may be wrong, but they do not yet address extinct languages. Just because it is in development I do not think we should despise it. Something new always takes time and is full of problems. I suggest we take a forward-looking view and keep them on here. Thanks.Dave (talk) 15:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Something new here

message: sector phylosector [ps] geosector [gs]
 zone  phylozones [pz] or geozones [gz]
can there be a language having ps-gz or another having gs-pz? Idea of examples? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:25, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there are quite a few examples of gs-pz zones (e.g. Khoisan languages), but not any ps-gz. I'll have to check this. I believe that ps-gz is theoretically possible, but not most practicable: if the languages of a ps are shown to be in genetic relationship one with another, then the constituent zones of the ps are also likely to be based on genetic relationships. --Gareth Hughes 11:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments from the former '''Talk:Linguasphere_language_code''' page

message: Some points raised on this discussion page between 2006 and 2010 were covered four years ago by the updating of the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguasphere Observatory article in 2012, including corresponding references and sources.  
However, the editorial comment this month (August 2016, on the current "stub" quality of this same article) must be welcomed.  
Collaboration between the Linguasphere Observatory's Linguasphere Register and the German data-based website www.hortensj-garden.org has been recently referred to under en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_code.  This development will hopefully be clarified shortly on the Linguasphere Observatory's website www.linguasphere.info and under an improved version of the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguasphere Observatory (and its French-language equivalent).  — Preceding ~ comment added by Dafydd y Bladur (talk • contribs) 16:07, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2016 : Further Editing and Updating needed
Talk:Holy See–European Union relations

message: This article does not describe what the article title sys, IMO. The current article is a list of decisions the EU has taken which the Catholic Church opposes. The EU has taken these decisions independently, not in relation to the Cathoic Churhc, the Vatican, or anyone else. The same or a similar list could be given in an article titled "The European Union and the conservatives in the US" or a number of similar titles (will we have articles listing all major political organisations and the objections of all major religions?). 
I don't really see how this article can be made according to WP:NPOV: even if the text is neutral (which it isn't, though an effort has clearly been made), the subject, the choive of topics, is a reflection, of "what the catholic church opposes in the EU". Perhaps that would be a better title, but I fear that the article will always have problems by its nature. An other solution is to make the problems between the EU and the CC a section of the main article, which lists the diplomatic ties between the two etcetera. As it is now, the title does not at all reflect the contents, and the contents are very one-sided. Fram 09:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I totaly agree, especily phrases like the failure of the EU to include God in the constitution. Interesting idea though if expanded and made NPOV. - J Logan t: 13:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The article confuses the Holy See with Vatican City. These are two different entities, one claiming to be a non-geographic sovereign entity, the other a territorial creation of 1929. See Holy See Clivemacd (talk) 12:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Forest Hill, Toronto

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Upper Village. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 22:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Upper Village" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The current revision () has text stating that "the neighbourhood's original boundaries" included Eglinton Avenue to the north, and "Neighbourhoods north of Eglinton are sometimes though not unanimously regarded as Forest Hill." I checked the history, and this wording has been here for 15 to 20 years. But what is meant by "original boundaries"? Is it supposed to refer to when Forest Hill was incorporated in the 1920s, or when it was annexed by Toronto in 1967? Either way, the section north of Eglinton was part of Forest Hill. Therefore I propose to delete the text saying that the area between Eglinton and Briar Hill was not part of the original boundaries of Forest Hill. --Mathew5000 (talk) 04:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundaries of Forest Hill
Talk:Antonio Pérez (statesman)

message: Someone needs to punctuate this properly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.237.167 (talk) 13:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have restored it to edit by 201.161.41.59, 22:19, 26 June 2007, as everything after that seems to be vandalism and reversions.  I believe I have not missed any legitimate edits. The vandalism seems to originate with the same user under different names and consists of randomly inserting exclamation and interrogation marks. User 71.87.68.138 has been warned repeatedly but it seems other user names are being used by the same individual.  GS3 01:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Vandalism 

message: In fact the Chief Justice of Aragon, Juan de Lanuza, did not "die in riots" but was executed (December 20, 1591) by order of King Philip II after the Freedoms of Aragon had been supressed on account of the Pérez affair. This is a historical fact known to every Aragonese.
::I have corrected the error. Thank you for pointing it out. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes.  GS3 (talk) 19:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ''I believe I have not missed any legitimate edits''

message: In his biography of Antonio Perez Marañon says Antonio Perez was born in Madrid in 1540 and discusses in appendix 106 the date.  There is no question that he was born in Madrid although he spent some of his infancy in Val de Concha, in the province of Guadalajara.
There is no evidence (or even possibility) that Antonio Perez could have been a "converso" (for which he would have had to be a Jew earlier in his life). This is just not possible so I have removed the unsourced speculation. 
I believe the style in Wikipedia (indeed in English) is to write Perez without the Spanish accent over the e and that is what I have done.  I will leave that to the editors.
I do not know how to insert footnote references so I have not done it. Anyone feel free to do it.   GS3 (talk) 18:57, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place and date of birth and other edits.
Talk:António José Severim de Noronha, 1st Duke of Terceira

message: The dates and ordinals of List of Prime Ministers of Portugal do not match with this article. That article has him as President of the Council of Ministers of the Kingdom of Portugal only three times. I don't know which is right, but I hope someone with some expertise in this area would resolve it. Thank you. SchreiberBike talk 23:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:Philece Sampler

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: So, why does Jessie Green redirect here ? ? ?
There's nothing in the article about how that name and Philece are connected.
Rather curious. 2600:8800:C89:EA00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 02:37, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jessie Green" 

message: I have no idea what the standards are for updating a page correctly, but the video game section for Philence Sampler's filmography should be updated to include her role in Rune Factory 5. I could be wrong but it may have been her last video game voice role prior to her passing. 70.51.81.86 (talk) 01:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to video game section.
Talk:Proty

message: I concede that Proty is indeed a comparatively minor character. Nevertheless, it seems to me that enough information appears here to warrant NOT DELETING it, and that this is consistent with the criteria set out in WP:FICT. For example, depending on how you count them, at least five other articles link to this one, and possibly as many as ten. In the two years since it was created, it has been edited by eleven people. I hope this is enough reason to remove the Proposal To Delete. If not, let me know and I'll write more. --Keeves 10:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it wasn't deleted.  Good thing, as I just completely rewrote and expanded the article.Konczewski 02:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to delete this article
Talk:Piero Ferrari

message: The link doesnt work and I don't now what they mean for an engeneering degree at fermo corni institute since the link doesn't work and there are two fermo corni instutes  Modena And both of them are  professional high schools , And in Italy to become an engeneer an high school diploma isn't enough  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrognomo (talk • contribs) 18:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engeneering degree at fermo corni institute 

message: To call Piero "illegitimate" is uncorect as the Father Enzo Ferrari recognised him, immediately after the death of his first wife ( mother of the deceased Dino) who was opposed, mostly for economical reasons.
LOL  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.67.221 (talk) 18:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  PIERO HAD BEEN RECOGNISED BY FERRARI 