lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yiannis Kouros

message: The 20-26th Nov 2005 record was not indoor but track, according to http://www.roadrunnersclub.org.uk/colac_6_day_race_05.doc (word document). PeterGrecian 16:05, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, changed. Arsine 15:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nov 2005 record 

message: This article reads too much like a syrupy promotional puff piece. It is not encyclopedic in tone. Finell (Talk) 21:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggest changes? To be fair, it's difficult for any piece on Yiannis Kouros not to sound like a puff piece, as he dominates the field so completely. Fig (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality tag 

message: The speeds aren't consistent with the distance/time.  209.6.54.113 (talk) 00:37, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect speeds
Talk:Temporal styloid process

message: "The styloid process is a ____ of slender, pointed, and of varying length; it projects downward and forward, from the under surface of the temporal bone in the _____.
What is it, where is it, in the opening sentence. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: an some one tell me the options available for the treatment of Temporal Styloid process !!
I will be grateful.
you may post me your info at "pranesh@i.ua"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.128.29 (talk) 09:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment !! 

message: A longer than normal styloid process can also compress the internal jugular vein. Possibly causing or at least exacerbating tinnitus.  That is the case with me. See my write up in Eagle Syndrome (Talk). 2001:8003:E40F:9601:B8E5:9D6C:A6D0:E6A6 (talk) 01:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clinical Significance
Category talk:Overlapping galaxies

message: I don't see how galaxies could overlap without interacting ... meybe this should be merged? -- ProveIt (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Overlapping galaxies would be galaxies that are in line-of-sight orientation from Earth as being in the same location on the celestial grid. I suppose it'd be nice for amateur star gazers with big scopes to see some nice things... This would be an optical association and not a gravitational association... (like constellations).  132.205.44.134 03:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: apparently, these occulting pairs of galaxies are important in researching dust in galaxies. 76.66.198.171 (talk) 13:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: overlap v interact
Talk:Vellus hair

message: I took out the un-sourced stuff about fetuses and anorexics in the last section of the sentence on Langue. This article is about Vellus hair so Langue can be mentioned but shouldn’t be elaborated upon and that stuff is better explained and sourced in the article on Langue anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.146.227 (talk) 01:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lanugo

message: Shouldn't it read that the hair is less than 2 millimeters, not centimeters? I would not call 2cm "peach fuzz". That would be plain old hair.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conical Johnson (talk • contribs) 07:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Vellus hair also has the characteristic that, unlike terminal or other hair, it is very difficult - and painful - to pull out or pluck. I think this should go in the article, but I have no sources so leave it to a better editor... Nick Michael (talk) 10:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you understood the question; or you've posted under the wrong section. JohndanR (talk) 00:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 2cm?

message: Hairs have a sensory function and it should get mentioned in the "Function" section. I think that it's a more demonstrable function than what is in there currently. There are good references for confirming that hairs have a sensory function, but I'm not sure any specifically refer to vellus hairs. The ones on my nose and forehead are very sensitive, but that's not a reference.Ken234Fabian (talk) 05:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The Sensory Function of Hairs
Talk:Elizabeth Haldane

message: A web search does suggest notability.   Eg http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9038853
But we need to capture that here.
Regards, Ben Aveling 16:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This hasn't been provided, and yet  continues to remove the notability tag. --Ragib 19:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add the notability into the article then, don't post dubious links.  Never heard of her, support deletion based on what is included on this WP page.Michael Dorosh 19:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by "dubious links"?  EB isn't exactly "dubious".  Guettarda 20:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have time to chase down everything she did (which if memory serves was actually quite a lot) but I've added on detail that by itself should establish notability. JoshuaZ 20:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and unfortunately your one-sentence addition contained an extraneous word and lacked capitalization. ;-) Michael Dorosh 20:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I rather thought the point of writing Wikipedia articles was to actually write something worthy of being called an article. One sentence and a link to any website, EB or not, is called a waste of everyone's time. If anyone really cares about this subject, they'll take the time to write a good article.Michael Dorosh 20:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

text: The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain. Editors should therefore provide references.
I added a tag requesting proof of notability of the subject close to 3 weeks ago, and wasn't provided any. Thanks. --Ragib 20:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2006 Moray by-election

message: Something very, very strange is going on here. There seem to be two Talk pages in existence for this article. See Talk:Moray (Scottish Parliament constituency). --Mais oui! 16:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I've worked it out: somebody has made Talk:Moray by-election 2006 (without the comma) a Redirect (for some unexplained reason) to Talk:Moray (Scottish Parliament constituency). That much I now understand. What I do not understand is what the heck that Requested move is about? Not a peep about it over here, which is where I suspect it should be, or at least notification should be. --Mais oui! 16:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already cleaned it up. At least I think I did. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 13:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Moray (Scottish Parliament constituency) was moved to Moray by-election 2006. I couldn't move it back because the original page was then a redirect, so I used WP:RM to request it moved back and the newly-created Moray by-election 2006 be redirected to here rather than back to the constituency article. Which has all now been done.  —Whouk (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has anyone got a link to the full results we can add as a reference? I'm yet to find a site showing the results with turnout, percentages, etc., although I imagine the Moray council website will have them later today. —Whouk (talk) 08:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result citation 

message: Does anyone know how to fix the layout to clear the whitespace on the article (at least in my browser)? I assume the results table doesn't want to appear until the Scottish politics box has finished. —Whouk (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table layout
Talk:New York's 8th congressional district

message: The change from the previous language to the current changed the meaning nearly 180 degrees. While we could quote notable individuals who say that the district is gerrymandered, it is most definitely not Wikipedia's place to be making these judgements. --Ashanda (talk) 17:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, it has been a week and nobody has said anything. If after another day nobody has objected, I'm going to revert the section back to the previous neutral version. --Ashanda (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

text: Fair enough. How do the modifications I just made strike you?--Ashanda (talk) 23:52, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

text: I'm jumping in now. An explanation of why the redistricting happened would be great, or even an article about it.--A21sauce (talk) 20:41, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of Geography section 

message: What is the source for that determination? Is it population based? Ie implying .01% of residents in the district are living in a rural setting? 100.33.241.138 (talk) 18:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's from the Census Bureau's website that's on the article's first reference. —twotwofourtysix(talk || edits) 02:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  .01% rural
Talk:List of airports in Poland with paved runways

message: I think this should be merged with Airports in Poland.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What - the merger? Yes - it's unlinked (nothing links here) and nobody is going to type this into the searchbox. And the target article is not very long.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Dell Prairie, Wisconsin

message: The lede is using town in two different ways ... the Wisconsin way and the other way.  So it is currently saying the Ghost town is located in the town which is pretty confusing to anyone who does not know to checkout  Town#Wisconsin or Administrative divisions of Wisconsin#Town and neither appears wikilinked from the lede.Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wisconsin Town
Talk:Gingles, Wisconsin

message: Some anon. editor put in an item about the Gingles name. Initially-I took it out-this had no relationship to the history of Gingles, Wisconsin.This editor put it back in.Rather then getting into an edit war, I moved the template and reflist and left a comment for this editor to respond.Thank you-RFD (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The history of Gingles, Wisconsin- 
Talk:Marengo, Wisconsin

message: If a 71 sq mi town needs its coordinates stated twice, shouldn't they be the same? Looks like one of the coordinates shown is for the census designated place which is not in the Town of Marengo, but rather in the Town of White River. Having two Marengos in the same county when one of them has a different official name must be difficult to defend. Topeka Sam (talk) 11:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town of Marengo
Talk:Uniting Friends in America

message: It has become clear that anonymous editors are going to continue to vandalize this entry with implications that our social group has something to do with another popular acronym used on the site.  Anonymous editing--particularly when the editor is not signing in with the intention of purposefully hiding his or her identity--is usually done anonymously because it is invalid.  Show your faces in Talk and we can hash it out.  That's how wikipedia works, not by warring back and forth with edits.  UFIA is a group that has been in existence for a while now, and if you don't know that, perhaps it's because you're not a memeber.  We can't help that.  But don't try to put your own meaning onto our group, Uniting Friends in America.--Minaflorida 16:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not sign in and sign your posts, then?--Minaflorida 16:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever.  It'll likely be deleted anyway, because our group doesn't have very much of a historical or social signifigance to the population at large.  It just seems that the wiki page is a good idea so folks don't get confused about what the name means, since, yeah, it has more than one meaning.  It just seems like by remaining anonymous, you're sending a signal that you know you're doing something wrong.--Minaflorida 16:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed67.172.31.111 19:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Double Agreed 63.84.231.3 21:51, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Public holidays in Malta

message: There's a claim that Malta has the most PHs in the EU - but Cyprus' wiki lists 18 dates vs Malta's 14. Some regions of Spain also have 16. Probably not an accurate claim.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.251.24.65 (talk) 08:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of holidays & Weekend Public Hols

message: Ok - I note two things:
St. Peter & St. Paul - patron saints
Up to my knowledge only St. Paul is patron saint of Malta, together with St. Agatha, St. Publius & Pope Pius V. St. Peter is only patron saint of Birzebbugia.
* Not sure, compiled this by memory. Could be that I pluralized the adjectective: San Pietru u San Pawl Patrun(i)
1st May - is it worker's day or also St. Joseph the Worker?
* I'm actually not sure! Different sources give different versions. Some say 1st Sunday of July. Some 1st May. Some put it with St Joseph on March 19, I personally (mistakenly?) know it as March 31 :S
Maltesedog 16:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, 13 December is NOT St Lucy... it's Republic Day. Please confirm this against this link: http://www.doi.gov.mt/EN/archive/publicholidays/pholidays10.asp --195.158.104.78 (talk) 14:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have spent a number of days tidying up this article.
Firstly, a few things to note;
*Do not place linguistic glosses (things you translate from one language into another) in italics, use single quotes instead.
*Write the word 'Saint', rather that 'St.' or 'St'. Reserve the contractions for the names of institutions, churches, etc.
*Keep the dates to the dmy format, and do not use ordinals – 'st', 'nd', 'rd', 'th'.
*Say that something happens 'in' a city/village rather that 'at' it. It is just more grammatical.
I have completely re-ordered everything, so that it is done strictly by date. This is shown in bold, at the start of a bulleted line. This means that several events which occur on the same day will appear on the same line. This makes it easier to navigate the article.
Ask at my talk page if you are unsure about anything.
–Sb2001 talk page 21:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  renovation 25 July 2017
Talk:Shanagolden, Wisconsin

message: Assuming a town of approximately 90 sq mi needs to have its coordinates stated twice, shouldn't they be the same? It would appear that one set of coordinates shown for the town of Shanagolden is actually for Shanagolden, the unincorporated community. The stoutly defended policy of calling the Town of Shanagolden simply Shanagolden has consequences. Topeka Sam (talk) 11:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town of Shanagolden
Talk:Almena (town), Wisconsin

message: Can this article be merged with Almena, Wisconsin? QZanden (talk) 22:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request
Talk:Zeb-un-Nissa

message: I've noticed that in the article, she is referred to as Zeb-un-Nissa, whilst she is called Zebunnisa in the title. Should the whole article be renamed Zeb-un-Nissa?--Le Grey Intellectual 10:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Zeb-un-Nissa? 

message: I moved the page to Zeb-un-Nesa, because it's more compatible with standard Persian transliteration, and it's a little more frequent in academic texts . Jahāngard (talk) 17:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Zeb-un-Nisa

message: It does read like someone has paraphrased it from another article - there is neither passion nor fidelity to historical truth and it does a grave disservice to such a charismatic and tragic figure. Most of it is petty hearsay and gossip. There is no mention of the Sufi influence, of the mughal composite culture and the brilliance of Dara Shikoh and the galaxy of mystical and poetic luminaries revolving around him - all of which were represented to various degrees by Zebunnissa. Soomeone desperately needs to undertake the task of rewriting this - and if nobody will then I shall! -- itihasi 00:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a terrible article
Talk:Vovin (album)

message: How about a short link to Alexander Vovin? (I am not experienced enough at WP to do this.) 71.90.131.109 (talk) 04:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexander Vovin 

message: She's not mentioned - jcubic (talk) 12:12, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Martina Astner]] 
Talk:Uncanny X-Men

message: End of Greys can be merged here briefly, it does not need to be deleted. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:6C25:525C:A2C8:1915 (talk) 13:06, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The series' (Vol. 1, 1963–2011) title wasn't changed to Uncanny X-Men with issue #114 (October 1978); this is false. The adjective "Uncanny" was first added on the cover with issue #114 onward, but the series didn't officially change titles until Uncanny X-Men #142 (February 1981). A change of title on the cover does not imply an official title change; the official title is reflected on the indicia inside. Every comic-book on this series prior to Uncanny X-Men #142 should correctly be referenced as X-Men #1–141.--Pagina18 (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: So the information stating that their are only 18 Annuals to Uncanny X-Men vol. 1 (1963; 1981) is inaccurate.  In addition, there is an annual for Uncanny X-Men vol. 4 that is unlisted as well...
If you observe the entry for Uncanny X-Man vol. 1 (1981) on the "List of X-Men comics" alphabetical page[X-Men List of Annuals: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_X-Men_comics#U], you will discover that not only did this volume include 18 Annual issues from about 1982 through 1994, it in addition had a continuation referenced as Annual(s) '95, '96, '97, Uncanny X-Men / Fantastic Four Annual-'98 & '99, that makes for 5 (five) additional Annuals.
This continues with the Annual 2000, and Annual 2001, making for 7 additional annuals.
Finally, their are apparently three more additional annuals simply numbered "#1, #2, & #3" where the applicable month/year dated to these final three annuals are August 2006, March 2009, and May 2011Uncanny X-Men Annuals (2006-2011) https://comicvine.gamespot.com/uncanny-x-men-annual/4050-18405/.
In conclusion, I propose that the media template featuring the Issue count for the first volume account for 28 collected annuals [10 (ten) additional], instead of the presently listed count of 18.
  --JEG2076tricenti (talk) 10:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  18 Annuals
Talk:Rice Lake (town), Wisconsin

message: Hello all, I am from the Czech Rebublic (Czechia) and I am living in a small town called Zamberk (Žamberk). Zamberk and Rice Lake are Twin Towns, so I translated article on en Wiki - Rice Lake, Wisconsin. You will find it here: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_Lake After that I have found, that  there exist another article regarding Rice - Lake Rice Lake (town) on en Wikipedia. Is there any good soul who can explain me difference between Rice Lake (town) and simply Rice Lake? Is name Rice Lake used for larger area than only town? 
I think it is one possibility because when I have participated on establishing sister city relationship between Kunvald, CZ and Lititz, PA last year, I have found the same question in Lititz. 
Thanking in advance, regards Bohemianroots 12:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Ok thanks I see, but why population is 3,026 in one and 8,320 citizens in another article?
Bohemianroots 20:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi- keep the article as is. The village of Rice Lake and the town of Rice Lake are 2 seperate government entities. The town of Rice Lake, Wisconsin is legally an organized town within the county. Also one more note there are no townships in Wisconsin. This can be an vexing, confusing item considering the surrounding states of Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois have townships.Thank you-RFD 23:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rice Lake (town), Wisconsin vs Rice Lake, Wisconsin 
Talk:Kenedy, Texas

message: Hello. I am currently researching my family tree and one of my Grandfathers was supposedly born in either Shoot or Chute, Texas. It is supposed to have been near Kenedy, Texas but may no longer exist. Can anyone verify if this is indeed the case? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Artemisboy 16:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mljet

message: There is considerably more evidence (though none at hand, as I am posting from work) that St Paul was in fact shipwrecked in Malta, not Mljet. Rhialto 04:44, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put a link in the article regarding the Mljet vs. Malta controversy. I believe that article leans toward Mljet having more evidence. I would be interesting in what you have. Even so the section regarding the "St. Paul Shipwreck" should hopefully not get deleted but maybe modified to include information regarding this controversy. --MarsRover 07:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Editing other pages, I've since discovered that "Mljet"/Croatian nationalism colours much of the application such pages receive. This is truly a shame and says little about the worth of such editors' contributions. the roof of this court is too high to be yours (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Paul 

message: There are also local legends and places stating that he arrived at Malta, specifically the island of Gozo. Rhialto 04:44, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this is a legend, it will be hard to prove one way or the other. I called the section "Odysseus's cave" so it more centered around the cave since that is indisputable. And it does have the legend associated with it so I see no reason that cannot be included. Prehaps there is a way to include Malta in the article. If that is done probably need to fixup Malta or Gozo article to have something about Odysseus. --MarsRover 07:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oddysseus 

message: I'm sorry about your situation. However i don't know how can i help you. Maybe you have to take a break from Balkans pages. However i reported his behavior: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:DIREKTOR. Regards --AndreaFox2 (talk) 17:32, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re

message: Apparently, mongoose introduction didn't happen in "Middle ages", but at the beginning of 20th century by decision of Austria-Hungary's Ministry of Agriculture. According to this article (written in Croatian), 11 specimens (7 male and 4 female) were introduced in August 25th 1910.
--- Martin (talk) 11:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. I have amended the article along these lines, using a different source. GregorB (talk) 08:37, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mongoose introduction
Talk:Chinlone

message: This edit removed information about the governing organization and the rules; apparently Chinlone is played competitively after all. The lead paragraph is largely plagiarized from here. AxelBoldt 17:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire page is duplicated here.  The question is, which came first? Treygdor (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Competitiveness and plagiarization

message: I think it might not be true that only women do solos. For example, you can watch this Chinlone video, in which there are men doing solos, too. --Meldor 21:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I misunderstood the sentence. --Meldor 00:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Solos

message: Isn't there any free image to illustrate the article? --Meldor 00:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: just added sports project, as it is a sport, also played throughout the world, and ozzie project, also played in oz (see external link of oz championships). Coolabahapple (talk) 00:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  added projects