lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:They're Tearing Down Tim Riley's Bar

message: This sounds an awful lot like Arthur Miller's play "Death of a Salesman."  Can anyone confirm that this was the inspiration for the episode and, if so, does it merit inclusion on the page?
: I don't the them as being all that similar, since Willy Lohman's interaction (or lack of the right type of it) with his family is the key to Salesman, and here it is how Windom's character Riley recedes into a happier past as typified by his good times at the bar and how that world was more real to him than his present one.  The main similarity is that both are about salesmen facing a "midlife crisis".  Rlquall 16:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Death of a Salesman
Talk:Anura Tennekoon

message: Infobox doesnt seem to be displaying right. Any help/fix appreciated. Lesliestng 22:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed it. silly error. Lesliestng 22:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox problem 
Talk:Treaty of Wedmore

message: I may just being daft, but I can't find any reference to the Treaty of Wedmore as being something to do with setting up the bounds of the "Danelaw". The only reference to it in the sources I can find is at Asser's Life of Alfred, 56: 
"When he had heard their embassy, the king (as is his wont) was moved to compassion and took as many chosen hostages from them as he wanted. When they were handed over, the Vikings swore in addition that they would leave his kingdom immediately, and Guthrum, their king, promised to accept Christianity and to receive baptism at King Alfred's hand; all of which he and his men fulfilled as they had promised. For three weeks later Guthrum, the king of the Vikings, with thirty of the best men from his army, came to King Alfred at a place called Aller, near Athelney. King Alfred raised him from the holy font of baptism, receiving him as his adoptive son; the unbinding of the chrisom on the eighth day took place at a royal estate called Wedmore. Guthrum remained with the king for twelve nights..."
Translation from Keynes and Lapidge, Alfred the Great. That compilation contains, I believe, most of the source material for Alfred's reign, and I doubt Keynes and Lapidge would have left out something as important as the Treaty of Wedmore. My guess is that whoever wrote this article confused it with the Alfred - Guthrum treaty (c.886-890). I propose to revamp this article in line with this and create an article on the Alfred-Guthrum treaty if no one has any objections! Harthacanute 22:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, changes made! Comments appreciated. Harthacanute 14:10, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion with Alfred-Guthrum treaty

message: The map image presently used in this article for 'Misunderstanding of "treaty"' is from a bit of a sloppy scan, and is fairly low resolution. I've just uploaded this image: it's a scan of a slightly older map, but it's pinpointed at the same date (878 AD), it gives essentially the same boundaries (but not quite), it's much more detailed, and it offers a much higher resolution. You might want to use it instead of the existing image, and no doubt you'd want to change the caption. Nortonius (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved this map to the Treaty of Alfred and Guthrum as that was about the actual carve up of England between, Alfred and Guthrum. The Treaty of Wedmore was more about the surrender terms for Guthrum.  Whether these terms existed (other than Asser's record), were written down or  were only a verbal agreement is not known. Perhaps the Treaty of Alfred and Guthrum was actually the formalisation of the agreement at Wedmore? This is all open to speculation. Wilfridselsey (talk) 16:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New map available
Talk:Mesomeric effect

message: Modification: article started out as a substituent effect text but progressed as an resonance effect article. In present article mesomeric effect is limited to M+ and M- effects in relation to inductive effect. For the other context see resonance structure. Present article also sticks to IUPAC goldbook definition. V8rik 22:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by 123pickles456 (talk) 01:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors Organic Chemistry I
Talk:Meggan (character)

message: New Mutants Annual #2 (1986).—Preceding unsigned comment added by BOZ (talk • contribs) 05:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - I added a stubby pub history. 67.173.11.90 (talk) 02:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First American comics appearance

message: Both Meggan and Captain Britain were not included in the 198 project but both have been shown with powers since then. This probably means that at this point Marvel offical stance is neither are mutants.(Mikey01 07:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mutant Status 

message: he main article mentions that Meggan's natural appearance resembles that of Alpha Flight's 'Snowbird'. I remember that and always wondered if the writers intended to reveal that Meggan had similar origins to Snowbird. After all, apart from the strong resemblance, both have elemental ties to their native lands that weaken them if they are away from home to long. Coincidence or not?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimotag20 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resemblance to Snowbird 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 10:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Meggan →  – Meggan is an alternate spelling of Megan and should redirect to that disambiguation page.  Meggan Dawson-Farrell, Meggan Scavio and Meggan Rollandi all have articles on Wikipedia, so Meggan cannot be considered unambiguous. 162 etc. (talk) 20:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 July 2021
Talk:Jaspers' Warp

message: # We could really do with something about the name or the lack of it. Regarding it as an arc worthy of an individual article is no problem; the thing is everyone including the Alans just seems to refer to it as "Captain Britain" or "the Alan Moore-Alan Davis run on Captain Britain". 
##For halfway official mentions, Claremont calls it "Jaspers Warp" (sic) in his intro to the 1988 CB trade but most of the intros I've been able to find copies of almost go out of their way not to name it. 
##As far as I can see "Crooked World" seems to originate from the 2002 untitled Captain Britain trade starting with that episode, but then I am working from scans of that one and am missing the non-comic pages, frustratingly.
# Talking of the 2002 trade, there was some story going around not long after that Joe Quesada had put much effort in to sweet-talking Alan Moore around (tying into the big push he was making to get the likes of Gaiman, Ennis, Morrison etc to write for Marvel) and then when the trade came out it was missing some promised credits acknowledging Moore created some characters were omitted and he predictably went ballistic, leading to the whole Original Writer thing when Marvel came knocking for Miracleman. Struggling to find a reliable source.
# Related to the above there's those stories that Claremont wanted to do a story featuring the Fury and Jaspers in the eighties and couldn't because Moore held the rights, yet around the same time as the trade Zombie Claremont was able to fuck both characters up with impunity. Be interesting to know what changed in between. 
# I can't find a proper source for who Tom Tusker is based on, just speculation that it's General Jumbo or Eric Dolmann.
# The BNP thing is interesting, according to this wiki the current bunch of twats didn't start pooling their inadequacies until 1982. Be interesting to find out if this was a coincidence or if Thorpe knew of the earlier incarnations. Or if he created Earth-616 and the BNP in one chaotic stint.
# Would love to see some more contemporary feedback added; the strip getting good notices at the time is widely referred to in modern sources but some that aren't after-the-matter would be great.
# It's not just me, is it? That Arcade page just doesn't really go anywhere? BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 20:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite notes
Talk:Freedom Day

message: The date of 14 January is listed as Freedom Day, worldwide. I can't find any reference to this celebration, anywhere. Unless it can be substantiated I'll remove the reference in a couple of days. Arcturus 22:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just removed it. -- PFHLai 19:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I've just removed it for a second time. --PFHLai 20:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I just wants the date where the freedom  day is celebrates 41.116.101.136 (talk) 18:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Freedom Day
Talk:Saturnyne

message: (Starting the discussion, since the IP user that proposed it did not do so.)
It has been proposed that Courtney Ross, Sat-Yr-9, and this article (Saturnyne) all be merged together.  Initially proposed by 174.221.139.103 on 3 October 2019 (UTC)
*Support These all appear to be counterparts from different parts of the multiverse.  I don't know which one should be the main article, though, nor how to properly reconcile the three since I'm totally unfamiliar with them.  In all honesty, I don't think that even after a merge, these characters are likely to survive any deletion actions since they are supporting characters and real world notability has not been presented.  If someone cares to take this on, here is a dump of things that I did find, and notability might be best established bringing queer representation into the articles:   .  Maybe some info can be obtained here: , , , , .  If you plan to take it on, good luck!  Otherwise, I think these will be on their way out. -2pou (talk) 20:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Richard Bluestein

message: Richard is a really obscure personality...does anyone know how his biographical info was obtained? zack 20:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From various articles and interviews about him. 06:16, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just listened to a podcast Richard did on Yeast 2 located at:
http://yeast2.com/?p=119
Some time in the podcast he mentioned growing up in New Jersey...does anyone else know anything about this? 
71.225.111.234 05:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life in New Jersey 
Talk:MSN Search

message: Is it just me or does this whole article stink of POV? - Mike Beckham 22:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: POV Tag was removed prematurely when he said he was still fixing it replaced it Mike Beckham 15:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ref: "09:26, 18 February 2006 205.155.48.5 (Still POV, I'll work on this article later.)" Mike Beckham 15:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

text:  Sorry. Didn't know it was still being fixed. Assumed no one was looking at it. 24.166.150.105 02:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The two screenshots of MSN Search in Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox show absolutely nothing. The Firefox screenshot was taken on a computer with a higher screen resolution, which is why it appears smaller. Otherwise there is no difference. RComedian 13:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only significant difference is the line "Make MSN Search your homepage", which is present in IE but absent in Firefox.  I have both browsers and I have tried the page (with the same screen resolution), and apart from the line mentioned above and some minor cosmetic differences (a slightly different font for the "Search" button) there is no real difference.  The screenshots are thus misleading, as they suggest that Firefox renders the page in a different way from IE, which is not true. 131.111.8.102 00:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also do not see enough of a difference to warrant the additional image, in either my own viewing or the images provided.  kotepho 10:02, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Browsers 

message: Must we have the msn page in romainian? It should show the english one this is Wikipedia EN after all ;) Mike Beckham 07:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot?
Talk:Pud Pud in Weird World

message: I contest the neutrality of this article.
--Simon, 22:50, 14 February 2006
:I would argue that, in the context of the game, the puddings are indeed delicious - Zagrebo 22:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. One might argue that the phrase "Weird World" is blatant Pud Pud propaganda. Or perhaps not. --StuartBrady 01:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Francis Lewis High School

message: Congratulations and thank you to whomever made FLHS's page an actual formatted page.  Now we just need to get more information on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.130.238 (talk) 22:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good start 

message: I don't actually work on this article and I don't know who does, but I found this and it might be of use. Jam-packed Qns. HS is city kids' top pick I already have it in a , if you need it tell me. (I'm not watching this page by the way) ~Itzjustdrama C ? 19:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Info 

message: The article says that there are 50 percent Asians, African Americans, Latinos and Caucasians.  Either way this is a confusing statement.  Is 50 percent of the population of the four groups?  Impossible, what then, would the other 50 percent be?  Or is the article saying that each of the groups comprises 50 percent of the student population.  This is also impossible.  Lastly, there is no reference for the ethnic demography claim. Dogru144 (talk) 11:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor explanation of demographics

message: I have twice removed it as it appears to be clearly against WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI. Wikipedia is not a staff directory and there's little encyclopediac value in this group (or even explanation of what it is). DMacks (talk) 20:06, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabinet
Talk:1964 Democratic National Convention

message: There needs to be discussion of the challenge to the Mississippi delegation members, and the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, and Fannie Lou Hamer and the quashing of the effort by Lyndon Johnson to prevent the unseating of the white-only Mississippi delegation, and the fact that this changed the 1968 convention rules significantly, as well as the rules for the 1972 convention. -- Yellowdesk 23:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil Rights and challenge to Mississippi Delegation 

message: Would it be good to add the audio for RFK's speech?
link: http://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/2GpQmoTsiE6TPm0jtcpUTA.aspx  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.187.216.93 (talk) 03:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  audio for rfk speech 

message: In the section Mississippi Controversy, my wife wonders if the reference to Walter Reuther should be to Walter Mondale. Thanks! htom (talk) 21:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walter Reuther, or Walter Mondale? 
Talk:1996 Democratic National Convention

message: Lyndon LaRouche has been the bane on the Democratic party for years. His supporters are, in my opinion, evil, (I can say that as this is the discussion section and not the actual article), and damage he has done to American politics is far greater than one would expect. HOWEVER...
He did win those Arkansas delegates fair and square and they should have been allowed to take their seats. 
(I didn't actually get in the hall that year, but I got in the press tents and was allowed in most of the hotel funcitons, including a reception for Hillary Clinton)Ericl 20:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyndon LaRouche

message: As I mentioned above, I attended most of the events at the '96 convention and since the work of nominating the president and vice president was merely pro forma, most of the delegates spent their time listening to speeches, schmoozing, and eating. Although I don't think that going into the gory details of my scavenging leftovers [the bartenders were more than happy to let me have full bottles of whiskey, beer and charddinay when various receptions were over], I thought that the five o'clock feeding was something that should be recorded for posterity.Ericl 02:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that section.  It's textbook original research. JCO312 21:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the five o'clock feeding
Talk:Anzia Yezierska

message: I reverted the last change because it was copied from --Adam (talk) 23:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy right violation
Talk:Treaty of Karlowitz

message: No more flags, nobody? (Lithuanian, Italian, Russian...)
- All parties's flags are there.-U.A.— 14:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that, by the time of the Holy League, Russia cannot be seen as Muscovite. It became an empire one and a half century before. Vladimir Stojanovic  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.91.173.31 (talk) 12:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muscovite Russia? 

message: It's completely false. The article I mean. The serbian town of Karlowiz has nothing to do with Sremski Karlowci where the treaty was signed actually. Tbe real town was present day south western Ukraine. So this article is totally misguiding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.128.40.12 (talk) 23:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh? No, it's in today's Serbia.--U.A.— 14:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  To the Attention of Whoever wrote this article 

message: Austria was not equal with the Habsburg Monarchy, and Transylvania and Slavonia became tha part of Hungary within the Habsburg Monarchy after the Treaty. Toroko (talk) 17:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Austria and the Habsburg Monarchy

message: Why should the reader take note of this? 165.234.252.11 (talk) 18:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: not here anymore.--U.A.— 14:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "note the way the Ottoman ambassadors sit with their legs crossed" 

message: Wouldn't it serve far better than the current ugly one in French? Link.--Adûnâi (talk) 03:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The map in French is not ugly but it is in French. Feel free to remove it if you think the other maps on the page are enough and if other users mind the fact that it is not in English.... --U.A.— 14:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not add a map from Shepherd's Atlas? 

message: I reverted this edit even though it seemed to contain some good information - the English was simply too incomprehensibly written for it to be salvageable in my opinion. But if anyone wants to take a stab at cleaning up that info and adding some of it back in a more suitable form, please feel free to. -Elmer Clark (talk) 21:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted good-faith edit by [[User:178.221.44.247]]
Talk:Royal Moroccan Armed Forces

message: Somebody just copied from cia.gov and pasted it on this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jokersace (talk • contribs) 
:Thanks for being on the lookout for copyright violations. Whilst we normally do not allow copying from other sources, the CIA World Factbook is both in the public domain and generally viewed as an authoritative source. Since it is not copyrighted (it is a work of the U.S. Federal Government), it can be copied here without infringing the Wikipedia:Copyright policy.  -- The Anome 11:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied 

message: The article says:
..These Berber militias were able to resist the French and Spanish armies for over 30 years, from 1907 to 1933...
1933-1907=26, and 26<33 last time I checked...
This requires either a better explanation of how the number is arrived that (it's not explicit from the text) or a re-write.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.41.233 (talk) 20:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate Math 
Talk:The Family Man

message: Hey does anyone else think that the review section sounds kinda like it was written as a personal opinion? I also find that it sounds like its trying to promote the movie and Brett Ratner. I would think that the title should be changed to "Critical Reaction" and feature both negative and positive reviews. I would add, but I havent actually seen the movie, so i think someone should look into that.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.154.3 (talk) 20:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review section too biased 

message: I whole-heartly agree. And further more, I've never been overly fond of this particular movie. The main character, IMHO, was on the right track before that Clarence Odbody wannabe came along and screwed everything up. A Crittism section on this article would be a welcome addition.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.189.70.194 (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree 

message: I think this film is very good! This film teach us to live with our famly  in love and in peace! THats all{| class="wikitable" border="1"
|-
! header 1
! header 2
! header 3
|-
| row 1, cell 1
| row 1, cell 2
| row 1, cell 3
|-
| row 2, cell 1
| row 2, cell 2
| row 2, cell 3
|}—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.54.69.194 (talk) 05:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abdullaxo'jayeva Nigora  

message: The entry for the "Family Man" movie contains an image, introduction and info box from the "Family Guy" TV show.
(68.35.255.161 (talk) 02:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error -- contains "Family Guy" content 

message: I stumbled upon "The Family Man" via links at It's a Wonderful Life and Parallel universe (fiction).  Shouldn't there be a reference BACK to those articles, as well.  Along the lines of "The plot of Family Man is similar to what other movies?"  Maybe a "See Also" or "References" section. 50.177.91.141 (talk) 04:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Cross References or Links to "It's a Wonderful Life" and "Parallel Universe"
Talk:Research Corporation

message: RCSA
Angram challenge excepted!
ASRC
Aperture
Science
enRichment
Center
oh my god.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.88.253 (talk) 09:36, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aperture Science? 

message: For the record, I also received an award from the Corporation, in 1969 I believe, so could be added to the list.  Their online listing does not go back that far, unfortunately.  Somewhere I believe I have a jazzy citation from them that can confirm this.  RC are included in my Who's Who listing but that is not of course a RS as people write their own entries. --Brian Josephson (talk) 11:47, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nobel Laureates section