lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Savoie

message: WikiProject France Assessment
This article was listed on WikiProject France under articles needing assessment.  This article has been rated start-class because:
*Although there is a general overview of the topic, I did feel like there should be a link to the history of Savoie in its respective subheading. Also, there are no sources/references.
*Good images.
*See: Wikipedia:WikiProject French departements
Lazulilasher (talk) 18:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject France Assessment
Talk:Seine-Maritime

message: David V Houston (talk) 18:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  heraldry from French page 
Talk:Seine-et-Marne

message: -----
Wondering how to edit this département entry? The Wikipedia:WikiProject French departements standards might help.
I'm wondering why the table below overlaps the table at right.  Bug in wiki software? -Jwwalker 08:56, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Yvelines

message: I moved the text relating to this chateau to its own page, Château of Thoiry.  Kiwipete 08:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Château of Thoiry]] 
Talk:Vendée

message: Wondering how to edit this département entry? The Wikipedia:WikiProject French departements standards might help.
Just deleted two excess commas in the history section, notably "King Henri IV[comma- now deleted] issued the Edict of Nantes in...".  24.196.117.98 02:31, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was a little mistake in the "Geography & Climate" paragraph; the term "Vendéen" should be pronounced [vãdeɛ̃] (not [vãdeã]) (as in "gardien" [gardiɛ̃](french for "guardian") Baldodo (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inhabitants "Vendéens" pronunciation 

message: It is all well and good to be against what is pretty objectively a genocide of the revolutionary troops, but this article goes beyond that and is, let's call it, touchingly nostalgic for the ancien régime. It is right and proper to point out republican war crimes and not to make a faux-bipartisan issue out of the slaughter. But this article blurs the distinction between the political dispute (which had much more complex roots than just good upstanding clerical-minded citizens being robbed) and the horrific war. Someone needs to erase the appeals to emotion. 93.220.125.180 (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Haute-Vienne

message: I have merged Arrondissements of the Haute-Vienne department into this page. The history is as follows:
(cur) (last)  08:07, 23 January 2007 Kiwipete (Talk | contribs) (Remove text which is detailed in Arrondissements of France, update links) (undo) 
(cur) (last)  07:21, 31 December 2006 Grcampbell (Talk | contribs) m (moved Arrondissements of the Haute-Vienne département to Arrondissements of the Haute-Vienne department: Anglicise the French term department) (undo) 
(cur) (last)  08:33, 7 December 2006 Kiwipete (Talk | contribs) m (Change category) (undo) 
(cur) (last)  19:18, 19 August 2006 RevRagnarok (Talk | contribs) m (Stubsensor cleanup project; you can help! using AWB) (undo) 
(cur) (last)  17:44, 3 May 2006 CmdrObot (Talk | contribs) m (sp (3): arrondissment→arrondissement) (undo) 
(cur) (last)  04:26, 28 April 2006 Bucketsofg (Talk | contribs) m (Reverted vandalism by 62.255.236.65 to last version by Dlyons493Bot. Please do not compromise the integrity of pages.) (undo) 
(cur) (last)  04:21, 28 April 2006 62.255.236.65 (Talk) (undo) 
(cur) (last)  17:39, 27 November 2005 Dlyons493Bot (Talk | contribs) (French administrative division bot - arrondissements) 
--MinuteElectron 10:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Seine-Saint-Denis

message: -----
Wondering how to edit this département entry? The Wikipedia:WikiProject French departements standards might help.
There are missing entries for the subsections; filling them might be prioritized. --128.233.153.78 18:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

message: The economy section is a a joke, "There are large immigrant communities with high levels of unemployment".
I don't see any report with economy. 
Minato ku (talk) 23:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economy 

message: I don't really see the point of having demographic data from 1999. The noughties were probably one of the decades with the most immigration - at least that's what I thought. Is there anything out there which is more updated?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.241.145.34 (talk) 13:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics 

message: At least these three are in the arrondissement of le Raincy, not the arrondissement of Bobigny: Dugny, le Bourget, Drancy --Espoo (talk) 00:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect map? incorrect distribution of communes
Talk:Val-de-Marne

message: Seems to be out of date, is'nt it?--Cabanero (talk) 04:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current National Assembly Representative
Talk:Val-d'Oise

message: The rendition of this page at low resolutions (800x600) is pretty bad. Anyone know what to do about it? 77.103.130.64 (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look now.  I added a template which ensures that text does not overlap the department table. Kiwipete (talk) 09:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Resolution
Talk:Alaska

message: I think this is because polygons that span the 180th meridian have some undefined behavior with geospatial libraries. GeoJSON in particular is a bit iffy about this, not sure if that is used here.
Wcedmisten (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Still not corrected. It's a mistake to call the article A class in light of this glitch. Martindo (talk) 11:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interactive map doesn't show Aleutian Islands past the 180th meridian 

message: The section I removed in March in Special:Diff/1143124233 appears to have been re-added to the article by an IP editor.  But I see no reason why we need such a section; and with that context an edit summary saying  seems to be trolling. Walt Yoder (talk) 22:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I only edited the page to provide attribution, since I found it via CopyPatrol and the section appeared to have been copied from COVID-19 pandemic in Alaska. I don't have a very strong opinion either way and I'm not going to get into a long-winded dispute over it. I think it's reasonable to include some information about the pandemic, although a few sentences or a short paragraph with a hatnote directing the reader to COVID-19 pandemic in Alaska would probably be sufficient. The COVID-19 pandemic was a major historical event with broad implications and I don't see why it shouldn't be mentioned in the article. I really don't think re-adding the passage was a trolling attempt—sure, it's possible, but absent clear evidence to the contrary we should assume that the IP added the passage in a good-faith effort to improve the article. — SamX [talk · contribs] 03:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  The word-for-word copy of material I removed in March was not "very new information".  The IP could not have thought it was. Walt Yoder (talk) 04:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They could've easily copied it from COVID-19 pandemic in Alaska or noticed that the section had been removed and re-added it without checking the history, and "very new" could just mean "very new relative to the other events described in the article". I really think you're reading into this too much, but I'm not going to engage further. — SamX [talk · contribs] 05:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COVID section
Talk:Arizona

message: I'm looking at the guide for this and I have never met an American who pronounces it as "ARR" as opposed to "AIR." I think this might be the British pronunciation? could we include both pronunciations in the guide? it just seems so strange.... 2600:8802:1718:5700:3C6D:308F:F7CC:1C1F (talk) 05:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:8802:1718:5700:3C6D:308F:F7CC:1C1F 2806:2F0:1100:20A5:80E1:E7F8:1AF4:CEA5 (talk) 05:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation Guide 

message: Hi everyone, recently Governor Hobbs signed into law HB2477 making Pluto the official state planet. Is there a way we can add this to state symbols infobox? Verysad1012 (talk) 23:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a State Planet 

message: CK was purchased by Canadian firm Alimentation Couche-Tard at least 15 years ago, HQ is in Canada now. 75.167.204.115 (talk) 13:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circle K is not HQ’d in AZ
Talk:Arkansas

message: If someone with access could fix the two bolded words that are incorrectly capitalized that would be great.
"Arkansas is 72.0% non-Hispanic white, 15.4% Black or African American, 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native, 1.5% Asian, 0.4% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, 0.1% some other race, 2.4% two or more races, and 7.7% Hispanic or Latin American of any race.[83] In 2011, the state was 80.1% white (74.2% non-Hispanic white), 15.6% Black or African American, 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native, 1.3% Asian, and 1.8% from two or more races. Hispanics or Latinos of any race made up 6.6% of the population.[84] As of 2011, 39.0% of Arkansas's population younger than age 1 were minorities.[85]"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CapitalizationMan (talk • contribs) 19:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization Errors in Race and ethnicity 

message: In the middle of the section discussing Arkansas' education system, there is a heading with a single sentence fragment talking about emergency management. This should be deleted or moved to a more appropriate place and expanded upon.
Emergency Management
The Emergency Management in Arkansas is being provided by the Arkansas Emergency Management Eugene Farmer (talk) 16:58, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emergency Management Heading and Single Sentence Fragment in the Middle of Education Section 

message: Add “Northwest Arkansas” to “Major Metro and Urban Areas.” 
Justification: NW Arkansas has a population over half a million and is one of the fastest growing metro areas in the country. 2600:8804:8C4E:B400:4C5B:FE52:C918:8FD (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Lightoil (talk) 02:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 May 2023 

message: In 2015, The top countries of origin for Arkansas’ immigrants were Mexico, El Salvador, India, Vietnam, and Guatemala. Add this information to the demographics section.
https://www.immigrationresearch.org/system/files/immigrants_in_arkansas.pdf 2600:6C50:7EF0:4A70:4598:5B87:F2FB:F342 (talk) 23:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! DrJuiceBoy (talk) 19:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 August 2023 

message: ARKANSASARKANSASARKANSAS
}} 73.231.62.112 (talk) 01:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2023 

message: How about listing Levon Helm as a former resident! 2601:194:4100:7240:650D:C6CC:635E:3F91 (talk) 18:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Levon Helm
Talk:Connecticut

message: Please review the largest towns table. It has several errors, listing Stamford as being in New Haven County and New Haven as being in Fairfield Country. These have been reversed, and I suggest that they be fixed. Guitarandguts (talk) 21:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 March 2022 

message: Nathan Hale is the official state hero. Can't add it to the template, though. Gott (talk) 04:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology and symbols 

message: The redirect Kangzhou has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Kangzhou]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Hi there! The article states the area of Connecticut with 5,018 sq mi (13,023 km²). The source for that is the Official State Website. However, 5,018 sq mi are in fact 12,996.56 km². 13,023 km² would be more like 5,028 sq mi. It appears the author of the state website made a typo, either with the numbers or with the calculator. What is the correct number now? Best regards, --R.Schuster (talk) 09:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Additional info: census.gov says 5,543 sq mi. --R.Schuster (talk) 10:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area of Connecticut
Talk:Georgia (U.S. state)

message: The redirect State of Georgia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Estar8806 (talk) 23:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:State of Georgia]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect City (Georgia) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mdewman6 (talk) 19:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:City (Georgia)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Someone is again requesting that Georgia (Country) be moved to Georgia. Given that it would impact this page, I think it's worth mentioning here. See the discussion here. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 04:45, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet another RM request 

message: Yes, there’s two Georgias. However, the other Georgia is a country, not a state. A state is not a country, meaning there’s only one thing that could be logically referred to as a state. Unless there’s another country with a state system and a Georgia, then it’s an unnecessary disambiguation. If there is, I congratulate Georgia on her successful mitosis. However, in case some people say this is too ambiguous, in the interest of maximum clarity so nobody gets confused, I think the name “Georgia, the Fourth Constitutional State of the United States of America (not the country)” would suffice as an alternative. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The term "state" also often refers to a country, i.e. state (polity) and sovereign state. Thus, "Georgia (state)" is still ambiguous. Loytra (talk) 10:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is U.S. really necessary?
Talk:Illinois

message: The NPF league folded in 2021, the teams page reflects this information correctly. This should be moved to former sports teams.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Bandits GuitarCigarMan (talk) 16:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicago Bandits listed as active sports team 

message: Under "Demographics", there should be information regarding the fact that the state population of Illinois was under-counted by approximately 250,000 people, when updated information was released by the Census Bureau two years later in 2022:
https://greatcities.uic.edu/2022/05/25/illinois-census-data-shows-state-undercounted-by-nearly-2-gaining-250k-residents-bureau-admits/
https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/05/2020-census-undercount-overcount-rates-by-state.html
Recommend editing the "Demographics" section to include information/disclaimer acknowledging the census undercounting by 1.97%, which would clearly indicate that the state population is actually above the 13 million threshold. 2443t5erer4 (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 03:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2023 

message: The US Census Bureau has officially stated Illinois did not lose population at the 2020 census. The state's population grew by approximately 250,000 people, putting Illinois at over 13 million people for the first time in it's history. This means Illinois has never lost population at any ten-year census count. The question remains, why is Wikipedia using the incorrect data originally released by the Census Bureau for the state's population, but not using the corrected/revised data released by the Census Bureau several weeks later, when the Census Bureau admitted the original data was not accurate? If this were about New York City and the Census Bureau came back and stated the population went up and not down, I'm sure you guys would be quick to adjust that in its article. Other regions don't get the same consideration? Is Wikipedia playing favoritism? Wikipedia is an internet encyclopedia, it should strive to have the correct information in its articles. 2600:8801:131C:6F00:845A:9DF6:D4D6:EE88 (talk) 16:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Iowa

message: Although I'm a great supporter of organic farming, I can't see any justification for the first para. of this section being dominated by a discussion of organic farming in the state, especially as it's less than 1% of farms there that are organic. Boscaswell talk 22:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agriculture section: organic farming 

message: A request has been submitted to WikiProject Iowa for a new article to be created on the topic of Housing in Iowa. Please join the discussion or consider contributing to the new article. Best regards, -- M2545 (talk) 16:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notification: [[Housing in Iowa]]

message: I dont want to remove it in case I am wrong but I would be surprise if a German song about a Christmas tree really is Iowa national anthem. Remij00 (talk) 00:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  National anthem 

message: Interestingly, the entire page does not contain the word pork. The section of agriculture is greenwashed, stressing sustainable farming . I will flag it. Wuerzele (talk) 20:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pork
Talk:Louisiana

message: Last sentence in the lead: "It also has had the highest in the United States since at least the 1990s." This makes no sense: the highest what? (Apparently, at some point in the past it used to read "It also has had the highest homicide rate in the United States since at least the 1990s" but this was removed I guess in this complex edit. -- 2001:16B8:1408:9600:1462:8C94:82E1:5858 (talk) 18:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical sentence 

message: @ 216.10.238.30 (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I’, and my family  

message: As a person living in Louisiana myself this is very maddening Creole is a small subgroup of the major Cajun group also Acadian's are not our ancestors we are Acadian this it's stupid to separate us also Cajuns are considered a unique ethnicity as decided in "Roach v. Dresser Ind. Valve & Instrument Division, 494 F. Supp. 215 (W.D. La. 1980)" Cajuns have a population of 1.2 million as decided by the 2010 census Louisiana has a total population of 4.624 million this article is actively spreading misinformation about a MASSIVE 25% of the population in Louisiana. The difference between Cajuns and Creoles is the simple fact that one is black and one is white. Creole is also a wide generalization not even given by them onto themselves Creole was originally used in the 16th century to refer to all people born outside of Spain/Portugal inside of the Spanish or Portuguese empire who was "of African ,Spanish ,or Portuguese descent. This means that almost everyone in South America all the way up to Mexico can (and in some cases is see) considered Creole. In this African Americans CAN be considered Creole but due to "gang culture" most African Americans consider themselves and I quote "black" this is how we should refer to them. Most of the time unless from rare case of descending from that of their former master "Creoles" do not have any Cajun blood at all so I formerly said they are a subgroup well let me say why. "Creoles" or as they like to be called (mostly) blacks like to eat the same as Cajuns with the twist that they add tomato paste to everything (I mean everything) that is their only connection to Cajuns besides Jazz and Zydeco. Samestillnotinsane (talk) 02:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the several grammatical errors aswell I made this while on my laptop so it's kinda hard to type. Samestillnotinsane (talk) 02:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Also I forgot to specify that in "Roach v. Dresser Ind. Valve & Instrument Division, 494 F. Supp. 215 (W.D. La. 1980)" Acadian and Cajun were legally classified as the same ethnicity. Samestillnotinsane (talk) 03:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creole Bias
Talk:Missouri/Archive 2

message: I've added a reference in the intro to the use of the term "Missoura" and referenced an interview from the Truman Library on the former President's use of the term. I know that there must be more to it than that, so anyone with more info please expand. Thanks. Harro5 03:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This very long article by a University of Missouri academic may be a good place to start. Harro5 03:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I'll add my vote of those traveling widely around the state hearing "Missoura" more in rural areas than cities. In addition, it also appears to me that older people are more likely to say "Missoura" than younger people. Jon 21:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missoura 

message: *While there are a multiple of income tax rates, these have never not been indexed for inflation and the highest rate (6.0%) kicks in at only $9000 per person, basically meaning that anyone paying less than the highest tax rate is in dire straights indeed. (On the Missouri Tax form, the final calculation to take account for all those lower rates is (Income - $9000) * 0.06 + $315.) Those in such dire straights as to have earned less than $9000 have a chart to tell them what to enter.
*Within Missouri, Only St Louis City & Kansas City have city income taxes. Those are both 1% for those living within those city limits and also all those working within those city limits.
*The Personal Property Tax is primarily a tax on automobiles.
Jon 21:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tax section

message: Um...
Of those Missourians who identify with a religion, three out of five are Protestants
...
The religious affiliations of the people of Missouri according to the 2001 American Religious Identification Survey:
    * Christian – 76%
          o Protestant – 50%
Am I missing something?Njerseyguy 07:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn east-coasters with their fancy cipherin' and such.  ENDelt260 16:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  50% != 3/5 

message: The state symbols infobox lists the paddlefish as the state fish, but the Missouri Secretary of State website lists the channel catfish as the state fish, and the paddlefish as the state aquatic animal.  The paddlefish appears to have been reclassified at the same time the fish was changed to the channel catfish in 1997.  More info here...http://www.sos.mo.gov/symbols/ . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.91.219.193 (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New/Reclassified State Fish