lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gay-Lussac's law

message: It has been speculated that Amonton was the first to note that Pressure was in direct relationship to Temperature. Should this be added to this article, noting that the Gay-Lussac Law is sometimes refered to as Amonton's Law? Dreamm 00:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Amonton's Law

message: Should there be a simple graphic that shows the relationship between pressure and temperature (as pressure increases, temperature increases)?
:I agree. An additional illustration to show the relationship using idealized hard spheres would also be nice.-- Beland 07:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a diagram similar to traditional ones demonstrating the need to increase the pressure to keep the volume the same as temperature increases - hopefully also showing the brownian motion idea. Egmason (talk) 03:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What's wanted is an  animated figure, like those shown for Charles's and Boyle's laws, but showing pressure changing (as in the Boyle's law figure) with changing temperature (as in the Charles's law figure) and or v.v. Graham.Fountain | Talk 12:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a Graphic? 

message: I was taught at high school that this law is not named after anyone, and is normally called the "pressure law".  Here is what I have found at http://hypertextbook.com/physics/thermal/gas-laws/
The pressure of a gas is directly proportional to its temperature when volume is constant. Symbolically …
P ∝ T
An isochoric process is one that takes place without any change in volume.
This relationship doesn't really have a name, but I have heard it called the "pressure law" or (mistakenly) "Gay-Lussac's law".
The basic gas law relationships … 
The pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to its volume when temperature is constant. 
This relationship is known as Boyle's law or Mariotte's law. 
The volume of a gas is directly proportional to its temperature when pressure is constant. 
This relationship is known as Charles' law or Gay-Lussac's law. 
The pressure of a gas is directly proportional to its temperature when volume is constant. 
This relationship is not associated with any particular scientist.
--Wei Cheng 06:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No name?  Pressure law?  Maybe not Gay-Lussac's law 

message: Why the hell are the units given in atmospheres? The SI units of pressure are Pascals.
And as for it not being Gay-Lussac's Law, that is indeed the way I was taught it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.143.156 (talk) 19:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 

message: I've got the animation requested for this page, in the same format as Boyle's Law and Charles' Law. Problem is, I've been trying to read through the information on how to add pictures to wikipedia, and I really can't understand a thing. If somebody who knows how to add pictures could contact me so I can send them the animation, it'd be great!! - Sniffity  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1388:803:A03E:683C:9381:FE3:72CB (talk) 03:52, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEED HELP ADDING ANIMATION
Talk:Generalized Maxwell model

message: I derived those equations by hand myself. If I ever publish the derivation in a journal, I'll drop a DOI to the article here. Until then, it may serve to reference any book on viscoelasticity as they invariably discuss the Maxwell model in one fashion or another. While the model is typically discussed, deriving a single general equation which eliminates intermediate values is never, in my experience, covered. I expect I'll probably have time to publish somewhere in a few years. Until then, you'll have to take my word that this is how the model looks. I may also include a collapsed box with a full derivation in the future.
Xenomancer (talk) 19:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the citation needed tag on the general equations
Talk:Generating function (physics)

message: i wonder whether the table is screwed; how can a = a + b. I think somebody tried to show how the generating functions are somehow related to legendre transforms (i.e. F2(q,P,t) = F1(q,Q,t) + QP), but i am not sure. Also, why do some of them have a positive sign for the legendre transform, something i dont understand?
anton
You are right the indices screwed up. I fixed it Piti131.215.7.198 11:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Immaculée Ilibagiza

message: just seen her on Sixty Minutes.  She has a very important story {hiding in a restroom | bathroom}.
I suspect that her firstname would relate to immaculate.  I do not recall this spelling | pronunciation.  There is also Immacul%c3%a9e_Nahayo_Nyandwi, Hutu.
Thank You.
[[ hopiakuta  | [[ %c2%a1 %c2%bf  %7e%7e%7e%7e  -]] 00:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've
Talk:Masa (restaurant)

message: -- $350 prix fixe, excluding tax, tips and beverages.  - from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F06E3DC1639F93AA15751C1A9629C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2
I think this is more accurate than saying, " dinner for two costs $800"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.108.232.33 (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: PRICE RANGE
Talk:Geophysical global cooling

message: Objections include...
# A shrinking planet would increase its speed of rotation. There is no evidence of such an increase.
# There is no overall pattern to mountain ranges.
What evidence would you expect to see? And there *are* large-scale patterns of mountains, along the plate boundaries William M. Connolley 13:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objections include... 
Talk:Geopotential

message: Added a figure!
Stamcose (talk) 10:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

message: Comments about article "Geopotential"
Section "Definitions" is OK! Obviously written from the point of view of a meterology stressing the "centrifugal force" and the distinction  between between gravity/gravitation. Simple definitions of simple concepts like "geoid" etc are given. Fine!
Section "Mathematical formula" is a bit pointless and not good. This "z" variable is for example rather pointless!  If kept at all it should be replaced with the text of section "Newton's law" of article "Geopotential model"
Comments about article "Geopotential model"
This article is very important because it documents the advanced mathematical concepts on which the gravitational models are based THAT ARE VERY DIFFICULT TO FIND IN THE LITERATURE.  The orbit propagation software used by space agencies all over the world are based on these concepts but the theory is "hidden in the software" and the generation that originally developed the concept is not around anymore. New improved coefficients are fitted to observed spacecraft orbits but this does not require the full detailed understanding of the internal mathematical algorithms the orbit propagation software is based on.
Conlusion: A justification for having two distinkt articles could be that the first is a very elementary one for the layman and the second an important reference for the expert
 
Stamcose (talk) 10:39, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging "Geopotential" with "Geopotential model"
Talk:Romanian National Opera, Cluj-Napoca

message: I'm confused by the 1904–1906 construction date and the circa 1919 opening date. Was there an opera company in the same building during earlier Hungarian rule? If so, it certainly should be mentioned. If not, whatever the building was used for during that time should be mentioned. - Jmabel | Talk 01:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From 1906 to 1919 it seems here was a Hungarian theater and opera. I just added more informations. I had now idea about this. Sorry for not saying nothing about, i didn't knew. --Roamataa 05:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have reorganised the article and added more info, so hopefully it is now clearer. Alexrap 14:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Karl Gottlieb Pfander

message: Unless Pfander was relocated twice in 1837, there is a factual error in the article. Jaredj 03:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Izhar al-haqq was authored by Sheikh RahmatAllah Kainarawi, rahimahu Allah, and not by Pfander.
94.43.42.142 (talk) 08:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Izhar Al-Haqq

message: A recent edit made various changes from anti-Islam to anti-Christianity throughout the article. One example is the change from "He was renowned for using controversy to win Muslims for Christ and top of all the missionaries of his day as the Christian champion against Islam—used his entire life in the effort to convert Mohammedans" to "He was notorious for using controversy to lure Muslims to Christianity and top of all the missionaries of his day as the Christian missionary opposed to Islam—used his life in the attempt to turn Muslims to apostasy". I haven't reverted the changes because both are horrendously POV, so a revert wouldn't necessarily be an improvement.
The article also doesn't conform to large sections of the manual of style. It needs serious copyediting attention from someone with more experience in that than me. Marianna251TALK 23:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV & MOS issues
Talk:Grey francolin

message: I spent a few hours observing a small group of these birds the other day, and their behavior is absolutely fascinating.  I'm wondering if we can expand this article to include more information.  These birds have a tendency to attack reflections (or mirrored images) of themselves, so I'm wonderng if this reflects a lack of intelligence, or just poor eyesight.  Another thing I don't get, is when they get separated from each other, they spend a lot of time communicating with their distinctive calls from up to 100 yards away or more -- yet they refuse to fly over to one another.  Does this mean they forage independently, keeping in contact with the others, letting them know their location?  Does anyone know why these birds prefer to run than fly?  I'm assuming they are conserving energy. —Viriditas | Talk 01:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they prefer running to flying. The males are polygynous, I presume the one that attacked a mirror was a male. In India a decoy male is often used to capture wild ones. The article certainly needs additions as in most bird articles. The description and identification is usually the simplest part of study and the article. Ecological and behavioural aspects are tougher to learn about, but they should gradually be added to the articles. Shyamal 01:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the reply.  I will make an effort to do some research on the Francolins in the next week and update the articles as necessary. —Viriditas | Talk 01:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Behavior
Talk:Globally hyperbolic manifold

message: The given definition of global hyperbollicity in reference 1 does not apply correctly to spacetimes with boundary. In this case the condition has to be taken for the interior as a manifold in its own right. Otherwise the existence of a Cauchy surface cannot be guaranteed anymore. One can e.g. cut off a spacetime with non-empty spatial infinity containing a Cauchy surface near spatial infinity. Lets call the result M. Then the timelike spatial boundary of M will be non-empty, which prohibits the existence of a Cauchy surface. The first condition in reference 1 will still be fulfilled as I^-(p)\cap I^+(q) is just replaced by (I^-(p)\cap I^+(q))\cap M which is compact as the intersection of two compact sets. (I^-(p)\cap I^+(q))\cap int(M) however will not be compact if  (I^-(p)\cap I^+(q))\setminus int(M) \neq \emptyset.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doenermaster (talk • contribs) 13:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem on Spacetimes with Boundary
Talk:Packt

message: Note: This appears to be advertising.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.143.212.32 (talk) 11:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are there any good references to suggest that this publisher is anything other than a one-man show?  From the packt site, the only name mentioned is David Barnes, and he identifies himself variously as aquisition editor, series editor, author relationship manager and so on.  His blog is also prominently featured on each of packt's pages.  True there are several book reviews on slashdot, but it seems they're all from "Michael J. Ross" and submitted to slashdot after he had received a promo copy of the book from packt.  Not really an independent source. Thrapper (talk) 08:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  One man show? 

message: The results of the Packt Awards 2010 are still missing in the article :(
--188.98.66.2 (talk) 18:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Packt Awards 2010? 

message: Should we update the Open Source Awards section using an awards template? 
Years 2012-2018 are missing and i am not sure if they should be simply mentioned or added in the same manner presented for 2011.
Cheers User8654  — Preceding unsigned comment added by User8654 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open Source Awards
Talk:Gravimeter

message: the artcle do say nothing about measurements. The main question is: what does grawimeter really measure? Of course absolute gravimeter measure gravity field. What about others? My students please do not learn form this Web side ....:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.156.118.58 (talk) 12:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurements 

message: There is no good reason to (and lots of good reasons against!) linking words like "relative" and "absolute." Might as well link "mass" or "interference" or "fringe" (wjere they can read about a new TV series). Not at all hopeful and very distracting if someone hopes to see the difference between a relative gravimeter and an absolute gravimeter by clicking on the links.
--65.202.227.186 (talk) 19:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overuse of links
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Governments of Canada/Parliaments of Canada

message: (This talk started on Talk:List of Canadian federal parliaments and Talk:39th Canadian Parliament.)
In this article and the articles of the 1st through 38th Canadian Parliaments, there's no mention of the Canadian Senate. The Canadian Parliament is bi-cameral (made up of the House of Commons & the Senate). Has the Senate been abolished? without my knowledge?. GoodDay 19:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Senate is defiantly worth mentioning.  I have no problem with you adding it to the articles.  --Arctic Gnome 22:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

text: How do think the senate should be worked into the table?  --Arctic Gnome 22:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, though it's painstaking, may have to check list of All Canadian Senators tenures; and add them accordingly to each #Canadian Parliment. GoodDay 22:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Most of them don't even have lists of MPs.  I would think the lists of lower house members would be a priority if you want to spend that much time on these articles. --Arctic Gnome 22:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm aborting my plans to add the Senators to the Canadian Parliaments sections. Because the Canadian Senate is a continuous body, I'm not sure how to implement it in all the 39 articles (across nearly 140 yrs). This is a project, in which (due to lack of resources, tools & plain know how), I'll have to leave to others more qualified. GoodDay 01:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where's the Canadian Senate?
Talk:Gravitational mirage

message: I added a few new facts including other definitions, and some history information. Feel free to edit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jedziedzic (talk • contribs) 13:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A picture or diagram can be added. Why was this discovery important and what changed after its discovery? GOOD JOB KEEP IT UP! Chsvec (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Template talk:Userspace linking templates

message: These templates are not for use in signatures.  They are for use on talk pages to refer to other users.  You're not supposed to use templates in signatures at all. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 01:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe we need a thesaurus, signatures in Wikipedia are what is placed at the end of comments in discussions. Some of what is listed are unsign, the rest is what? --209.244.43.122 (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I'm going to take a few moments and try to sort this long mess into reasonable groupings.  if anyone objects, please revert.   --Ludwigs2 22:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sorting 

message: It doesn't make much sense to substitute the members, as then the documentation display will lag behind the actual templates as they are subject to regular editing. –xenotalk 21:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substitution? 

message: Hey if a "see also" template needs to be collapsed, that's a clue that it's just too big! All these templates are transcluded everywhere, making it darn near impossible to figure out where they are actually used. This monster needs to be broken down into manageable pieces. Wbm1058 (talk) 13:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess this is 

message: 36.252.130.130 (talk) 00:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Stickee (talk) 00:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 September 2014 

message: 192.0.2.0/24 ? shouldn't it be 192.0.2.0.42 as in all other places. Yug (talk) 13:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If correct, could we use an other example that "24" which is the exact inverse of "42" used in other templates. Yug (talk) 13:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Admin > Rangevandal > suspect edit error
Talk:Arena Hall (Belo Horizonte)

message: If it's currently officially called Chevrolet Hall shouldn't the article be at 'Chevrolet Hall', despite the controversy mentioned in the article.Number36 01:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mike Dred

message: Turns out the original version of this page came right from Mike's own site (). It survived to the present as this article's  section, so I've sent that to WP:CPN. I'll likely start working on a replacement next week (gotta get up to the far-away library with the good sources) if nobody beats me to it.
Box of wolves (feed) 00:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: * retroacid.be (live: , earliest archive: , June 19, 2021) is nearly identical to this revision's lead section from December 12, 2016
* jango.com (live: ) is also nearly identical to the same rev
The lead section has a long edit history on Wikipedia so I think it's safe to say the external sites were plagiarized from here instead of vice versa. I've removed the citations, and I'll go through and make sure the lead section matches , which is independent of Wikipedia, and cite that instead.
Box of wolves (feed) 19:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Box of wolves I think @Liz may have cautiously blanked part of this article due to the copvio raised in the AFD. Since you've examined this closely, are you able to restore the sections that you determined to not be copyvio? —siroχo 04:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like someone beat me to it. Box of wolves (feed) 10:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not add [[WP:CIRCULAR|circular]] references to this article
Talk:Gravity anomaly

message: I have never heard of a milligal, Oops, I should have asked Wikipedia!
Wikipedia does indeed have a definition of the gal. The article ought to reference it at the first mention of milligal.DaveyHume (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I had to look it up too... Given the gal is a deprecated unit, I wonder if it should be changed. Lovingboth (talk) 10:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions
Talk:Bear trap

message: Why is this the obvious destination? What about a trap for bears?
"Beartrap" redirects to "Animal trapping"
---Great question... --Eddie 05:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The original content explaining the stock market term is more useful than the recent redirect. I propose to reinstate one of stock market explanations with a hat note to bear/animal trapping. Or make it into a disambiguation page  - Rod57 (talk) 13:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  original content more useful
Talk:Green–Kubo relations

message: The summary smells plagiarized.
192.249.47.196 (talk) 22:21, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It hits on a 2007 book, but it was in wikipedia since 2005, so most likely is OK. Dicklyon (talk) 01:35, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary 

message: Hey Guys :-)
Does anybody know for sure if  Newton's Law of viscosity is a mechanical (like it is stated in the article) or thermal transport process (indicated in the context)?
Thanks :-)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.199.48.24 (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example for thermal transport process
Talk:Employment and Social Development Canada

message: I see that big chunks of  the article have been removed from Wikipedia due to copyrights violations. I wonder if there is an automated  procedure at Wikipedia to find and isolate such infringemnets, or whether these infringements came to the attention of an editor simply by chance. Ottawahitech (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrights violations

message: New name for HRSDC.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.152.51 (talk) 18:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Employment and Social Development Canada

message: Employment and Social Development Canada may be subject to a departmental shuffle in the near future under the new government. May need to update in the future when more details are available. 
Jmenard-cc (talk) 03:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Departmental Shuffle
Talk:Grey noise

message: It appears the text of this article is taken verbatim from http://www.ptpart.co.uk/show.php?contentid=71 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.245.8.28 (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagarism? 

message: I seem to remember a political criterion by which white noise is an utterance which makes sense, though it might be insincere, and you know where it's 'coming from.'  Gray/Grey noise is meaningful but unattributed; black noise is meaningless.  Example:  If a dictator issues a glowing statement about his country's progress in the government-controlled papers, that's white noise:  white because it makes sense and you know who said it; noise because it isn't true.  If you tune in on a 'pirate radio' broadcast, it's gray noise--the words make sense, but you don't know whether it's true or not because you can't tell who is responsible for it.  Black noise, I guess, is just meaningless static, perhaps meant to jam broadcasts of the other two types.  Does anybody have any references for anything like that??
Terry J. Carter (talk) 04:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another criterion
Template talk:Detroit Indoor Soccer

message: Is this template really necessary?  Are we going to make templates for every city's indoor soccer history? KitHutch 01:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The Detroit Express were members of the NASL.  They did play regular outdoor soccer/football at the Pontiac Silverdome.  They were also members of the NASL Indoor league and played the North American version of indoor soccer for two years. KitHutch 20:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Detroit Express
Talk:Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

message: I propose to merge Research Branch of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. It is not a separate agency but a completely integral branch of the department. Both articles are short, so they could be combined seemlessly. If ever the info on the Research Branch expands drastically, we can consider splitting it, but considering that it hasn't expanded at all since creation in April 2008 (in fact, it shrunk), that seems unlikely. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal