lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of former municipalities of Sweden

message: This list is very inaccurate. In the first of the two local government reforms in Sweden during the 20th century the number of municipalities sunk from 2 498 to 1 037 as of January 1st, 1952. Already at that very date Sweden got 1 461 "former municipalities".
In 1974 there were only 278 municipalities left in the country. This list should therefore contain at least 2 220 names.
But, strictly speaking, all the former municipalities of Sweden were abolished on Januari 1st, 1971. The former städer (cities), köpingar (towns) and landskommuner (rural municipalities) were from that date replaced by kommuner (municipalities) of a uniform type. --Andhanq 22:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I also realized it was inaccurate and it makes me a little sad. I don't know what to do about it. / Fred-Chess 22:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, ideally the list should contain every historic item. Does this mean all the former municipalities of Sweden before 1971? Maybe, and in that case some 2500 items must be listed (although if it grows that large it should be broken down by county). This is a lot of work, but Wikipedia shouldn't strive for less. In China there are some 900,000 villages :) Do you have a decent source about the details of the local government reforms? Punkmorten 23:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a book (in Swedish) called "Sveriges komunindelning 1863-1993" (Sweden's municipal subdivision 1863-1993), Only very few changes have occured since 1993. It contains "family trees" for evey municipality in the country. Yes, it is as we say a "hästjobb" (a horse's work) to list them all here. It has not even been done in the Swedish version. But the articles on the present municipalities will soon contain information about the predecessors. --Andhanq 08:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jefferson Market Library

message: Not sure if anyone's watching this page, but any objection to moving Jefferson Market Prison to Jefferson Market (currently a redirect to this article), and then changing the focus to be the history of all the buildings in the whole area?  The prison itself is just one tiny aspect of what was at the site - to quote the NYC parks page :
:Today home to a park and library, the Jefferson Market opened on this site in 1833 alongside a police court, a volunteer firehouse, and a jail. The market grew rapidly to include fishmongers, poultry vendors, and hucksters until it was razed in 1873 to make way for a new civic complex and courthouse, which opened in 1877. In 1927 the jail, the market, and the firehouse were demolished and replaced by the city’s only House of Detention for Women, which opened in 1931. Famous residents of the detention center included Mae West, Ethel Rosenberg, and Grace Paley. The adjacent old courthouse was abandoned in 1945, nearly demolished but saved by the Greenwich Village Association in 1962 and readapted as a public library. In 1973 the House of Detention was torn down to make way for a park, its design and care trusted by the city to the Jefferson Market Garden Committee. The garden was originally landscaped by noted horticulturist Pamela Berdan, and today is sustained by volunteers from the community.
The current article has two rather shabby old NYT articles on the jail that was there from 1877-1927.  It doesn't really appear to be that notable stand-alone (the third reference is to a separate House of Detention that was featured in House of D).  The revised moved article can talk about the old buildings as well as the current garden & library.  SnowFire (talk) 07:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jefferson Market redirect: turn into an article?
Talk:Andy Hughes

message: again wikipedia takes it upon themselves to lie about reality based upon whatever any old person writes on the net.
a 'citation' is indeed a very dangerous thing here.
andy was known to me personally and i know he commited suicide. 
but - if you want to lie go ahead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.213.107 (talk) 12:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arvika Municipality

message: The municipality has no city status whatsoever. This municipal status was totally abolished in 1971. The city status is nowadays purely historical and has no administrative significance of any kind. It shoud be applied to the seat of the municipality only. --Andhanq 22:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now this irritating problem has been solved (in this case anyhow, but there are lots of more)--Muniswede 20:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jim Bohlen

message: * Wording used overwhelmingly praises the individual;
* Wording also has biased implications when referring to Greenpeace;
Probably for the good if a general info page for this person is found; current information looks too much like an endorsement, and also lacks much needed citations. cheezyphil (talk) 17:57, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhetoric
Talk:Military of Puerto Rico

message: The information on the military of Puerto Rico is dated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.23.223.110 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 5 November 2006
Why did the PRANG give up its jet fighters?  Was this because the USA was afraid that they would be used against the USAF by an independent Puerto Rico?124.197.15.138 (talk) 05:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: dated

message: There are a lot of errors and the info is outdated. Also, there are many missing hyperlinks to stuff mentioned that are covered in other Wikipedia articles. Please help clean up and update this article.Magnetizedlion27 (talk) 01:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many issues 

message: Per Wikipedia guidelines I am opening the topic of moving this page to "United States Armed Forces in Puerto Rico" to more accurately reflect the fact that Puerto Rico as a territory of the United States does not have it's "own" military. As it stands the title of the page may be highly misleading to readers who are not familiar with Puerto Rico and/or US military matters.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirazdoost (talk • contribs) 16:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Page Move
Talk:Measuring network throughput

message: *Oppose - I understand goodput to be a term of the art which is pretty much unknown outside a small networking community.  I believe there is room for both articles. In my opinion, the edits to what was Measuring data throughput have made the article less accessible, and less easy to understand. Goodput also encompasses more than simply the maximum throughput of data (less overheads), but includes packet loss; whereas people attempting to measure throughput are often attempting to determine the maximum possible data throughput under ideal conditions and may not appreciate just how large some overheads may be, before even beginning to consider items like serialisation delay, packet loss and other items. WLD 22:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. I have withdrawn my own merge suggestion. However, the "measuring network throughput" article needs to be rewritten in many ways. Perhaps it was good once uppon a time. Protocol overhead and kibiByte/kByte confusion only affects the throughput calculation a few percent as is not important. Protocol overhead calculations may be moved into the goodput article, or to a new article on protocol overhead. The focus of the "measuring network throughput" article should be on the key factors why the achieved throughput some times differ very much from the maximum throughput. Examples are TCP flow control and that the network capacity is shared with other users. These factors are described in the throughput article, but may be more pedagogically explained. (limited TCPSome of the details on protocol overhead may be moved to the goodput article. Mange01 08:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Goodput]]?

message: The Evaluation Engineering article on how to accurately measure bandwidth is an irrelevant reference
I will remove it within 48hrs.
Kendirangu 15:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant references 

message: I think the section "Kibi, mebi, gibi, tebi, and pebi prefixes", while interesting is not exactly on topic. The section "Nomenclature" neatly summarises kilo vs kibi differences. Would not a link to another article with this additional detail be better?
-drd 196.25.255.250 13:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move detail on prefixes to another article?

message: In regards to the article stating max TCP Window Size of 65536 bytes:
TCP Window sizing has different default sizes for different Operating Systems, and can be tunable on most operating systems. 63.250.222.254 (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TCP Window Sizing 

message: I thought the format of the definition was a bit strange
 => Max. Throughput = TCP Window Size / Round-trip time.
Is this really how definitions should be formated on Wikipedia?
Haakoo (talk) 12:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format of definition
Talk:Shirodhara

message: I fixed the English of the original version of this page that Sudarsanam2 had made and copied the picture from the Ayurveda page. Tocharianne 22:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I myself an ayurveda doctor. I will contribute more to this and other ayurveda/yoga pages. I will contribute my resources only. (donation to wiki) Drhashimea (talk) 14:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read and follow WP:COI. If you want to attempt to get your personal website accepted as a source, you'll need to start a discussion and get others to agree to it. --Ronz (talk) 17:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Chala

message: I don't think a merge should be possible here, because they are two different topics. One related to Peru and the other one to India. One is a geographical aspect of Peru and the other one is a name of a town. --Evelyn Zuñiga 19:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out the merge request. --Descendall 22:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chala
Talk:Love Nature

message: This reads like an advertisement.  Fix it. Michaelbusch 22:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, Muhandes. I saw that you tagged this image for "speedy"(?) deletion for this: "." However, the logo is of the channel using the former name. Are you sure it's a valid reason for deletion? --George Ho (talk) 21:37, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I'm not sure. I was merely pointing out that the current purpose of identifying the organization no longer applies. Whether this could be address by using another rationale or not is something I have no experience with. --Muhandes (talk) 07:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  May I take the image to FFD please, Muhandes? Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 08:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't mind, it was just routine tagging. --Muhandes (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Taken to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 July 28. --George Ho (talk) 09:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Oasis HD.svg]]
Talk:Chandur, Maharashtra

message: Chandur Railway has a railway station on Mumbai - Nagpur - Howrah main railway line line. By road it is connected to Amravati (30km) and Wardha (80km) by state highway (243). Chandur Railway has a bus depot from which direct buses to Nagpur, Aurangabad, Amravati, Akola, Chandrapur, Wardha, Yavatmal are available. Anurag Pawar 132 (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transportation
Talk:John Henry Manley

message: This biography seems to have been taken from the Los Alamos National Laboratory website. The site has a copyright notice and the following permission statement:
:For All Information
Unless otherwise indicated, this information has been authored by an employee or employees of the Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), operator of the Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. Government has rights to use, reproduce, and distribute this information. The public may copy and use this information without charge, provided that this Notice and any statement of authorship are reproduced on all copies. Neither the Government nor LANS makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the use of this information. 
Permission to use this material here is therefore assumed, but a rewrite is encouraged. ~ trialsanderrors 09:02, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
Talk:Orphans of the Storm

message: Are both task forces inert, given the number of basic edits that this page needed? If so, is there any reason to catalog them? FeatherPluma (talk) 21:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a claim by Pauline Kael that the film was not financially successful. Its "failure" is also mentioned in the lead. Were 3 million dollars (on par with DeMille's The Ten Commandments from 1923) really considered unsuccessful? It is mentioned to be less successful than Broken Blossoms, which earned "only" 600 thousand dollars, five times less. StjepanHR (talk) 03:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a financial success?
Talk:Sodexo

message: Forgive me for my ignorance, but wouldn’t it be more appropriately labeled as “Hospitality” in the Industry section of the info box? Sethcampbell7293 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 17:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree. Or maybe "food service" since hospitality is still a little broad. Changing that now. Glenn984 (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conglomerate Label 

message: PRISON OFFICERS WHO WORK AT BRONZFIELD PRISION ARE PAID SERVE THEIR PRISONERS TO LOOK AFTER THEIR WELL-BEING BUT MANY OFFICERS DO NOT GIVE A DAM ABOUT THE WOMAN IN THIS PRISON. WOMAN THERE ASK FOR THEIR HELP AN ARE IGNORED AND THESE OFFICERS ARE BEING PAID TO DO A JOB AND DONT BOTHER ABOUT THE WOMAN. WHEN THEY PRESS THEIR BUZZERS FOR HEP THEY ARE JUST IGNORE SND TOLD NOT TO BOTHER THEM. THEY USE THEIR POSTION TO ABUSE THEIR POWER. AND THE AUTHORITIES AT SODEXO JUST TURN A BLIND EYE TO THESE OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOB THAT THEY ARE GETTING PAID TO DO. TGE PRISON OFFICER DO NOT TREAT THE WOMAN THERE WITH RESPECT AT ALL. AT THE END OF THE DAY YHEY ARE STILL HUMAN BEINGS AN PAYING FOR THEIR CRIMES. THEY DONT NEED ANYMORE ADDED PRESSURE TO AFFECT THEIR MENTAL HEALTH. SODEXO U NEED TO PULL YOUR FINGER OUT OF YOUR ARSE AND FIX UP THE STAFF AN SACK THE ONES THAT DONT DO THEIR JOBS PROPERLY. IITS A TORAL DISGRACE AND WASTAGE OF TAXPAYERS MONEY. THE FOOD THEY SERVE NEED TO BE IMPROVED I WOULD FEED MY DOG THE FOOD TGEY GIVE THE WOMAN THERE. SODEXO YOU NEED TO STOP IGNORING TGE BEHAVIOUR OF YOUR PRISON GUARDS ANS SORT THEM OUT IMMEDIATELY. I BET THE DIRECTOR OF SODEXO IS GETTING PAID THOUSANDS OF POUNDS A MONTH FOR HIS WAGES SO WHY WOULD HE TAKE NOTICE JOHNATHAN. DISGUSTING AND DISGRACEFUL. 92.29.64.52 (talk) 21:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  PRISON OFFICER
Talk:Jay (disambiguation)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. As is often the case with questions of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, editors here have good faith disagreements about how to weigh and assess the two major ptopic criteria, and particularly to what degree topics which are only marginally associated with the base name (such as Toronto Blue Jays or Jaywalking) should be considered. (closed by non-admin page mover) Colin M (talk) 17:19, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 March 2022
Talk:Chittaranjan

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source of whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. -- P.K.Niyogi 08:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: I see that there are lot of entries made in Facilities section, which needs trimming. Some of them like 24hr electricity, water treatment plant, street lights, post office are not needed to be included in a Wikipedia. I am sure these facilities are part of almost all the cities in the world. Please remove those and just mention those which are unique to Chittaranjan. Thanks
--}- Cyarenkatnikh (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facilities
Talk:Damanjodi

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Any information added without reference is likely to be deleteed in future. -- P.K.Niyogi 04:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition
Talk:Dandeli

message: I've started rewriting this article.  Wikipedia is not a travel guide.  Specific hotels/restaurants etc shouldn't be mentioned, unless they are famous in their own right and have been written about by many independent sources. Papa November (talk) 19:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. There is very little information about the actual town though a lot about tourism.  I'll try to edit a little but I'm not knowledgeable about the place.Editfromwithout (talk) 05:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite needed 
Talk:Daund

message: Daund has created a niche for itself in the field of education. Last decade has seen growth of Daundas a Prominent Education Center with Colleges and Schools ranging from Engineering to Biotechnology to Law.
Dattakala Politechnic[2] offers courses from Primary Education to Masters Degree. Vidyanagari has a Law College, College of Engineering,[3] School of BioTechnology, Institute of Information Technology, MBA, MCA apart from Primary School and Arts, Commerce, Science College.
Campus in Near RPF/SRPF Ground[4] offers wide range of Technology and Management Courses. The campus has an Engineering College, a Management Institute and a Pharmacy College.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azardaundjna (talk • contribs) 14:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education
Talk:Deeg

message: Any info on the last maharaja of Deeg who was killed by police. Hydman 09:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://asi.nic.in/asi_monu_tktd_raj_deeg.asp. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 04:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: 0774 685 4791 
deeg 37.238.152.14 (talk) 10:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  deeg
Talk:Théodore Poussin

message: This article is about a notable (according to me, of course) comic book series that has been published in Spirou magazine. Please, do not delete it before seeing fr:Frank Le Gall! thanks. Frédérick Lacasse 22:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, it's notable.  Speedy tag removed.  Please try and flesh the article out with further information from fr:Frank Le Gall.  It would also be great if you could translate the French article and create an English article at Frank Le Gall.  Merci beaucoup!  Proto::type 13:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Waaaaaaaaaiiiiiiit!
Talk:Deolali

message: It has been suggested that User:Ganeshbot/sandbox/Deolali be merged into this article or created as a new Indian town article if unrelated. 
:Done --Henrygb 11:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are Deolali and Devlali the same place? Deolali seems to be the spelling on official sites.  Oosoom Talk 12:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Devlali into Deolali? 
Talk:Deori, Bilaspur district

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:United Nations Operation in Côte d'Ivoire

message: This article definitely needs to be updated. The article contains a number of contradictions and inaccuracies within its history section – such as the claim that the most recent extension of the mandate occurred in 2011. I will commit myself to updating this shortly.
Yeehaw!
Semancion (talk) 07:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section Updates
Talk:Dhemaji

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Matter without reference is likely to be deleted. -- P.K.Niyogi 22:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline
Talk:Dhubri

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Matter without reference is likely to be deleted. -- P.K.Niyogi 22:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline