lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Iron Maiden

message: Pinging @RALFFPL: Regarding your revert, please show me where in this source it states there were 100,000 at the festival (let alone at their particular performance), and that it was their "largest performance as a festival headliner in the United States". I don't see it confirmed. --ZimZalaBim talk 17:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I linked the info once again - as the report says there were 100k people in attendance, and - as I perfectly know the history of Iron Maiden shows, they have never ever played for such a big audience in the States as headliner. I know we can't find this info straight out of the linked article, but it's kind of my personal analytic invention as an author of this part of Wiki info. There's an Iron Maiden site entitled Iron Maiden Italia and a few others where people concluded attendance figures and the fact Iron Maiden played their biggest headlining show in the States. For everyone who monitoring their tours, it's obvious. I must admit haven't seen a few days-long festival reports where the journalists shared info on how many people attended particular shows or days. Just think about Wacken Open Air, Rock Am Ring/Rock Im Park, or even Rock in Rio - the reports bring the general attendance data. It's just the standard. Nobody doesn't know how many people attended Power Trip 2023 on each show. The article shared by a reliable source as Louder Sound/Metal Hammer says the attendance figure that I mentioned. So, it's simple. Maybe I'm wrong but have never read on WIKI about festival performances with attendance reports describing the results of particular bands or days - just headlining performers. I thought it was obvious. And once again - if you want to change something in the articles, PLEASE talk about the problem with an AUTHOR. Deleting the data is so easy, and restoring that  - is not. Regard RALFFPL (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to take a look at both WP:NOR and also WP:BRD. --ZimZalaBim talk 18:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Seems like WP:FANCRUFT to me. HorrorLover555 (talk) 18:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power Trip performance
Talk:Oslo

message: There must be mistake in the temperature table under ‘Climate’. It seems to think that the average annual min and average annual max is simply the min (resp. max) values of the average monthly mins (resp. max). This is incorrect. The true  average annual min is usually a couple of degrees lower than all the average monthly mins. 2A02:FE1:8C:3B00:84AB:BC01:FF5F:296E (talk) 22:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average annual min/max in temperature table 

message: Just out of curiosity, why has the Southern Sami been name included in the infobox? The range of Southern Sami speakers does not extend into much of Østlandet, let alone down to Oslo, and I would be surprised to hear that they've had much to do with the history of Oslo in particular (let alone more than other larger Sami groups in contemporary times). Is there a particular reason why the name is included? NipponGinko (talk) 12:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Southern Sami name in Infobox? 

message: Oslo is not a part of Akershus county—why does the infobox map depict Oslo as if it were a part of Akershus?  NipponGinko (talk) 12:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox map error
Talk:Trick-taking game

message: : The player sitting one seat after the declarer
In the third paragraph the term declarer is introduced, but no explanation of what this means or how it is decided. Perhaps there is something missing between paragraph two and three? I'm not sure what needs added, maybe text from later in the article could be moved?
— M3TAinfo (view) 12:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Basic Structure section

message: There's a better title for this surely? Unfortunately I'm too stupid to think of one. Mintguy
How are the linked games ordered ? Bridge, Whist, ... -- clearly not alphabetical :) -- ll
There's definitely a statement made by someone in the ordering...
=== control ===
I pulled this section because I couldn't find any examples other than Ambition.  If it is the only example, then it doesn't deserve its own category.
UninvitedCompany 19:27, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I pulled this section because I couldn't find any examples other than Ambition.  If it is the only example, then it doesn't deserve its own category.
UninvitedCompany 19:27, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  control 

message: The text seems to imply that everywhere outside the US, playing order is counterclockwise. Certainly this is not the case in, e.g., Sweden. Perhaps an actual example of a country with counterclockwise order would be better, if someone has such an example. -- Jao 15:06, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing order 

message: Article should include a section about the history of trick-taking games. (I don't know anything about it, though.) Azazell0 16:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Currently trump directs to a disambiguation page, but I feel it should go to the article on the term as used for card games. [That Trump (card game) article needs a lot of work by the way.] Please add your opinions: Talk:Trump --Parsa (talk) 04:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trump article

message: The trick in the image appears very artificial - too uniformly arranged and symmetrical.  Perhaps the article should show and caption several trick scenarios: (1) a high card won by the leading hand; (2) a high card won in other than the leading hand, all following suit and (3) a low suit card lead being trumped by partner; and (4) a high suit card being trumped by an opponent.   --Newwhist (talk) 17:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Trick picture

message: Klbrain (talk) 22:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in from Follow suit 

message: It seems that these are just two different spellings of the same word, but both are used interchangeably in the article. Slough is used 7 times but only in one section, while sluff is used only twice but in two sections. I'd suggest changing to use one spelling, but noting the alternate spelling the first time the word is used.
97.91.248.206 (talk) 04:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slough vs sluff
Talk:Anglo-American playing card

message: Are there different cards used in the English speaking world outside the U.S.? If not, then the intro should be rephrased.  Thanks, Meelar (talk) 00:38, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: Any particular reason this article is kept separate from the playing card article? The "Anglo-American" phrasing feels bulky. -- Netoholic 21:34, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine articles?
Talk:United States invasion of Grenada

message: NPR's Throughline had an episode about the invasion, the lead-up etc.: https://www.npr.org/2023/11/09/1198908205/throughline-grenada-nobodys-backyard  November 9, 2023. Kdammers (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio program 

message: It's a bit odd that this section describes the invading forces but not the defending forces. PatGallacher (talk) 21:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of battle 

message: Would it be worth mentioning that most of the votes against Resolution 38/7 were from Caribbean island nations, or maybe providing a list of the "no" votes? Bearing in mind that a map wouldn't be super useful since island states are hard to see. Voting record can be found here.
Also, the International reaction section describes criticism by Commonwealth states, but a large amount (maybe more than half: I haven't counted) of the "no" votes or abstentions were from Commonwealth states. I'm not sure that the current description of the Commonwealth reaction gives a full picture. Thoughts on this? Placeholderer (talk) 22:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Resolution 38/7
Talk:Sus (genus)

message: Revert vandalism in first line. Stelith (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing it out, I've fixed it. However, this article is not protected - please feel free to fix such things yourself next time. - MrOllie (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

text: Weird, it shows it as semi-protected for me and won't let me at it. Odd. Stelith (talk) 11:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Semi-Protected Request - 2020 MAR 10 - Revert Vandalism 

message: The final paragraph of "Diet and foraging" which states that "Although pigs are not true carnivores, they are deadly and efficient predators. They are documented man-eaters" should be sourced or removed. Delekof (talk) 22:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed - if someone want to re-word the bit with a ref that would be fine. If such is documented, lets have a reference. From my experience with swine on the farm way back when - I don't doubt that it is true. Vsmith (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2021 

message: <<The genus Sus is currently thought to contain eight living species>>
But there is 9 species in the list given in the article, which is ok. Is that intended ? Gimly24 (talk) 11:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! There had been a list of 8, with a 9th as a subentry of one of them, until this edit made the 9th part of the main list in its own right but did not adjust the intro sentence. Pinging User:Geekgecko, but in the mean time I'll change it. DMacks (talk) 12:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't get this ? 

message: Change sus amongus to sus as this is  incorrect and and obvious joke it is located at the top of the page in the first mention of the genus that isn't the title 2A00:23C7:848E:6E01:B8B6:224F:16B8:DE2E (talk) 18:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 February 2023
Talk:Learn

message: We don't really need this article - it can redirect to Learning quite happily - maybe the anonymous user who made this might be interested in the Wiktionary, a newly established wiki-based dictionary, which is just crying out for articles like this. --Camembert
I completely agree.  99.99999999999% of the people trying to find the article 'learn' is interested in Learning and not a song title of an obscure band. Epachamo 01:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Acupuncture

message: I would like to see some updated and specific data related to recent research and coverage for acupuncture in the United States Sam Collins 33 (talk) 19:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: please don't dump massive walls of text that are copied directly from websites or published articles here - WP:COPYVIO covers this. Now, if you are going to make an edit request, you need to be specific - 'change X to Y', supported by a particular source. You don't need to copy the contents of the source here, you can just link to it. However, it looks like you are asking for sweeping changes to be made to the article, and an edit request isn't really suitable for that. You're going to need to discuss the changes you want to see made here, and the sourcing, and gain consensus for the change. Girth Summit (blether) 19:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2024
Talk:United States national missile defense

message: This article is very out of date, referring to things that were planned to happen as far back as 2012. Outside my area of expertise/too time consuming for me to research to update, however if anyone is interested and able this article could use some love...
Carthage52 (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of Date 

message: Usafbeach (talk) 06:37, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 3.1 needs citations 
Talk:Vertex

message: According to the manual of style, we should drop the "In subject" before each entry. Isopropyl 05:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOS 

message: This is effectively a disambiguation page, so it seems a  template should be added... AnonMoos 23:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I did it. But I'm a bit of a novice, so it may need some expert tweaks. Steelpillow 10:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page

message: There is no direct reference to Vertices used with Computer Graphics on this disambiguation page. As one of the base elements of modern 3D Computer Graphics Design, I believe it should have a mention and redirection to its own page, assuming such a page exists, as I can't find it on the Wikipedia Site. Neobros 22:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK vertex (geometry) is currently the best target.  There is no vertex (computer graphics), nor are there any good page to redirect to.  You might want to write it. Taemyr 05:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Taemyr. I'd suggest expanding the existing bit about computer graphics on vertex (geometry), unless the page gets too big. -- Steelpillow 21:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

text: In fact I just added it, with a redirect to vertex (geometry). -- Steelpillow 22:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye, that should do it. Neobros 02:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Computer Graphics

message: some sort of portel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.231.225 (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vertex
Talk:The The

message: I looked up "controversial subject". I was looking for a definition of a controversial subject and maybe a list of the most notable and influential ones. But I got redirected to this thing about a band or something! Can this be fixed? 161.8.243.222 (talk) 23:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Controversial Subject was actually a stand-alone article about the song until 2019 when it was redirected here (due to notability concerens).  While I think List of controversial subjects is probably too broad for an encyclopedia, you may be interested in List of Wikipedia controversies for controversies specific to WP, or Wikipedia:List of controversial issues for controversial WP articles, or  for more specific controversies. I'm not sure that your experience warrants a Controversial subject (disambiguation) page, but perhaps a  hatnote on this article could be of use.  Hoof Hearted (talk) 14:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm confused. 

message: Given the band's ultra-deconstructionist name, this seems rather important:  is it correctly verbalized as "Thuh-THEE", or "Thuh-THUH"?  Or perhaps even "THEE-thee" (or "THEE-thuh" ?)
Plus, we have the British-accent factor which also might complicate this question, no?
(Been wondering about this for a long time; maybe someday I'll get around to actually sampling some of this band's tracks; I can't recall ever hearing them played on any USA FM station, much less an AM station.)  [signed] FLORIDA BRYAN 2600:1700:B9B0:4500:B860:5013:4762:BC25 (talk) 17:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I raised the syllable stress question in this dicussion, but never got a response. Hoof Hearted (talk) 15:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct pronunciation of band's name?
Talk:Intonation

message: I believe this article should be split into Intonation (language) and Intonation (music).  These two are related, but seperate things entirely.  There is enough information on both topics for two seperate articles.  I suggest a disambig.  Kntrabssi 07:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, not getting much feedback, are you? I support the split. There isn't much in common between the two topics, so that people directed here for one won't likely be interested in the other. kwami 01:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Intonation in Language and Intonation in Music
Talk:Luke Rhinehart

message: I do have the legal wherewithal to post this. There is a similar article on h2g2, which I also wrote. No copyright breach here. -Martin
:With all due respect, one never has the right to move text part and parcel from any website, to Wikipedia, without stating the source, and it is never appropriate to put content into Wikipedia that is original in its composition—based on original research rather than on the published work of others. This same issue was rectified at The Dice Man article, but still needs to be rectified here. In fairness, perhaps this was accepted practice in 2002. But it has not been for a very ling time. 67.167.8.141 (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal authority for transfer of h2g2.com material to this WP article

message: I propose redirecting Luke Rhinehart to George Cockcroft and merging any material that is here and not there to that article. Gobonobo T C 12:56, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya i think this article should be merged also, it is short and could turn it into a section on Cockcrofts page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beefcake6412 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I will begin doing the equivalent of this today. Cheers. 67.167.8.141 (talk) 05:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to George Cockcroft

message: Per earlier merge and discussion and consensus, see above, and given that the author is now freely disclosing his name and identity as that of George Cockcroft, the article for the pseudonym is being renamed with that of the actual author. Cheers, stand by. 67.167.8.141 (talk) 05:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is that discussion and consensus ? Sorry, I can't see it. -- Beardo (talk) 04:56, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Lou Diamond

message: I removed this sentence:
:"While he bawled out recruits who sometimes instinctively saluted him, he frequently failed, himself, to salute less than a field grade officer."
What does "bawled out" mean?  I'm not sure.  Also, it seems as if it might be contradictory.  If it means "berated"/"gave hell to", why would the fact that he yelled at recruits who DID salute him be portrayed as somehow hypocritical (in this sentence) if he DID NOT salute some of his superior officers?  Ufwuct 19:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was not an officer (but of a high non-commissioned rank) and recruits were making a mistake and showing ignorance of proper military conduct/ranks/procedures by saluting him. The second part (failure to salute non-field grade officers) wouldn't be per se hypocritical, it would go to show he was a highly regarded senior NCO (and/or a tough-as-nails bastard) whose respect you had to earn. And "bawled out" does indeed mean upbraid/correct behavior usually through a raised voice.  Gront 01:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bawled out

message: It strikes me that the introduction for this isn't very helpful or informative -- I came across the article by chance and I was really none the wiser as to why Diamond was well-known, thanks partly to the use of slang like "leatherneck". However, I don't think I know enough about US military history to recast it without messing it up or offending someone; can an editor who's more knowledgeable have a go? Gusworld 23:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article was originally from a USMC site and it is still in need of translation from Marine jargon to English. Like Chesty Puller, there are a lot of legends about Lou Diamond, so separating truth from fiction is also a challenge. I've revised the opening paragraph a little bit so that it might now make some sense to civilians. --Habap 18:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction needs rewriting? 

message: This article says he's born in Canada. This web site says Ohio. One of them is probably wrong. Repeter (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marine, Eh?
Talk:Triangle (musical instrument)

message: The joke I know about the triangle isn't so much about its simplicity...
: A man got a job working behind the bar at a large concert hall. During a performance, the place was empty but for one man who was sat on a barstool drinking a pint. As he approached to offer him a refill, he noticed this man was tapping his finger on the edge of the bar, and counting under his breath. Later, he asks the senior barman about it, who says: "him? oh, he's the triangle player. he's counting the bars.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarquin (talk • contribs) 10:55, 19 December 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should mention be made of the triangle at the beginning of the John Lennon song "Just Like Starting Over"?  It is one of the more easily-recognizable uses of it, that I can think of.  Mruss 21:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: triangle in modern music

message: I think it would be prudent to add a section to this article discussing the use of a triangle (iron or otherwise) as a Dinner Bell and have "Dinner Bell" redirect to this page.  Any thoughts? - Team4Technologies (talk) 18:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinner bell 

message: It would be great if the sources of the Janissary is added.
 “The triangle entered the European orchestra in the 18th century by way of the Janissary music of the Turkish
soldiers.” Peinkofer, Karl and Tannigel, Fritz. Handbook of Percussion Instruments. Mainz, Germany:Schott, 1969. Zzhan144 (talk) 00:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source about Janissary 

message: I was looking at Wiki pages for other musical instruments, and I think it might make this page more consistent with those if some of the section titles were changed. So I added a History section, put the "Ancient and Medieval period" under History, and added a Musical styles section.Jhunt34 (talk) 00:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing section titles 

message: The first couple sentences needs a citation. I added a sentence from Encyclopedia Britannica to include more information about the pitch produced by a triangle. Also included a link to the wiki article about overtones.Jhunt34 (talk) 01:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added information to beginning 

message: Can we add some information about how modern orchestral triangles are measured and what the difference is between the different sizes in terms of their sound? Siddyboy3.0 (talk) 21:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sizes
Talk:Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States

message: Why does this article state "the appellees (supposedly representing the United States)"? Were the lawyers representing the appellees not employed by the DOJ? Or is there some important detail about who the lawyers filling this appeal were? (I feel that someone is trying to slip an opinion into this otherwise NPOV article.) -- llywrch
racism is bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.30.175.59 (talk) 13:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untited 

message: It raddicly changed the way congress looked at  the comerce clause and rewerote the way we look at other people this act of the hotel was outrageous and dealt whith 68.59.44.124 (talk) 17:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Its Effects 

message: there is evidence that african american males had there ballsacks removed (cutt off) by white males in the Motel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.244.68.26 (talk) 03:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's nuts. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ballsack 

message: What's the motive behind defacing this entire article (header plus each individual section) with "needs external sources" maintenance tags? The original decision is sourced (findlaw) and contains most of the pertinent facts and allegations on which the case was decided. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A mess of "needs sources" tags? 

message: I want to source check and refimprove this and remove the template - it's embarrassing for the project to have one of the major cases of American Constitutional Law templated in this way - would there be objections to my using Bluebook citation throughout the page? I know Bluebook is demanding so I want to check with everyone here before I do this ... Seraphim System (talk) 02:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bluebook