lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Amiga Enhanced Chip Set

message: As you've probably noticed, I've closed the deletion discussion with a custom result to merge the contents of this, Original Chip Set and Amiga Advanced Graphics Architecture to a new article Amiga Chip Sets. So we'll need some discussion here about how we're going to tackle this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: All these articles are essentially unsourced. What should be done is not a simple merger of existing (unsourced) content, but creating a new article using reliable sources (or at least providing sources for main existing sections and then merging them in a new article). I will try to add references at least for some paragraphs to facilitate the final merger, but playing video games takes too much of my free time. Note there are stand-alone articles for other Amiga chip sets (prototypes), which should be also part of this merger. Pavlor (talk) 10:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging disparate articles
Talk:Tritec engine

message: In the opening paragraph we have:
In 1997, Chrysler Corporation and Rover Group (then a subsidiary of BMW) formed Tritec, a joint venture to design a new small straight-4 engine for small cars. They built a factory in Curitiba, Brazil to manufacture the engine. When BMW sold Rover Group, BMW retained the stake in Tritec.
Then in the third paragraph we have:
The Tritec engine was designed entirely by Chrysler and is related to the 2.0 liter Chrysler Neon engine. It is a modern engine with an SOHC 16-valve head, electronic throttle control, and meets Euro III emissions requirements. There are three current versions of the engine, 1.4 L, 1.6 L, and supercharged 1.6 L.
As you can see, the first paragraph states it's a joint venture, then the latter states it was designed soley for the Chrysler Neon, this seems odd as the Neon is a 2.0 and the current tritec is a 1.4-1.6
Because of that i've removed the third paragraph until it can be reliably verified. Silent52 (talk) 05:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction of terms

message: The Fiat E.torQ engine is a development of this engine that shares tooling and dimensions, initially with minor revisions. The E.torQ NPM engine has more in common with the earlier Tritec engine than it does with the later E.torQ EVO and E.torQ EVO VIS engines and components are interchangeable between all versions. Integrating the E.torQ page into the Tritec page would clarify the initial and later development of the engine on each page. BuffMyRadius (talk) 06:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing given the consensus not to merge. Klbrain (talk) 16:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge from Fiat E.torQ engine
Talk:Warsaw concentration camp

message: Change conspiracy theory to theory and add clarification that 200’000 is the largest estimate given for gas chamber deaths, as well as adding different sources for the historiography surrounding the camp, such as Norman Davies’ Rising ’44 discussion and so forth. 
The tone of this part is uncharacteristically and unnecessarily hostile and apparently reflects an editing conflict in which a bellicose accusation is implicitly made against another side, attempting to make the other ‘side’ as unacceptable as possible.
People should be extra careful when they feel the need to do so, especially when they have the power to do so, to make sure they’re not taking advantage of it.
This doesn’t require one to even change the overall conclusion.
The point is, if one is making the claim that a claim isn’t made with proper basis, one should adhere to a higher standard. One should try to be charitable towards others and their attempts if one can. I believe that there is a measure of unbridled hostility towards others here, which is very dangerous when given power. It seems like its goal is to get a “win” and attempt to discredit others, which is a temptation people should avoid if possible.
The idea that it is a “conspiracy theory” is somewhat spurious, no “conspiracy” is stated which would be required for it. 
The highest claim for dead at a subcamp was 200’000 total.
The post, given discourse around it seems ideologically hostile. I’ve seen people even call it a “hoax” (!) which is incredibly disrespectful.
London Review of Books is the only source given.
Norman Davies noted discourse around the damp in Rising ’44.
https://x.com/Pusher555/status/1124039866512289793/photo/3
The language is definitely bellicose or hostile, treating the person as an enemy not even someone wrong. That does not fit the bar for discourse that this demands. 2A02:A310:E23F:400:8C39:3F2B:51BC:9D42 (talk) 05:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: X.com? Slatersteven (talk) 09:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Not done: X/Twitter is not a reliable source. (WP:TWITTER). User:CanonNi (talk • contribs) 04:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 May 2024
Talk:Tavisupleba

message: Currently this is in Georgian language and in Mkhedruli script; that should be kept, but there should also be:
# transliteration into Latin script
# translation into English
Jmabel 02:11, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
----
Newcomer to Wikipedia here. Tavisupleba actually means freedom. There is a translation here, including transliteration: http://david.national-anthems.net/ge-txt.htm, not sure about the copyright implications. Judging by the marginal Georgian I learned it seems the transliteration is correct, albeit not scientific, i.e. it does not reflect the highly complex Georgian consonant sytem. Tribute2jimmyk 11:33, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We used to link this to an MP3 file as an external link, but the link http://www.parliament.ge/GENERAL/C_D/gimn.mp3 "went dead" (404 error). Does anyone know of something to replace it? -- Jmabel | Talk 07:55, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Added two onto the article, both are PD. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 04:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have more recordings on hand, but I think these two are fine, since they come from known government sources. Jmabel, see me on on MSN or email if you wish to have them. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 06:32, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording needed 

message: Please note that the copyright status of :File:Tavisupleba Video Montage.jpg is currently being questioned.  Anyone with thoughts on this is welcome to go to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree_files/2010 December 27#File:Tavisupleba Video Montage.jpg and leave your comments.  Richwales (talk · contribs) 04:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status of screen-shot montage from Tavisupleba video 
Talk:Indian Reorganization Act

message: Where can I find a list of the 61 terminated tribes? Perhaps an external link to start? I am completely ignorant on this subject.   I am aware that some tribes are not recognized by the US Government.  Termination would imply that these groups had some sort of recognition and then were no longer recognized. --Rcollman 20:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of terminated tribes

message: The entry says "In 1954, the United States Department of Interior began implementing the termination and relocation phases of the Act. Among other effects, termination resulted in the legal dismantling of 61 tribal nations within the United States."  This is unreferenced and unexplained.  It should be properly referenced or removed. Bricology (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1954? 

message: This is a ridiculous statement. The purpose and effect of the act was to finalize the annihilation of Native American culture and traditional governments. 96.42.48.125 (talk) 01:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The major goal was to reverse the traditional goal of assimilation of Indians into American society and to strengthen, encourage and perpetuate the tribes and their historic traditions and culture."
Template talk:Nations at the 2004 Summer Olympics

message: Hmm... I wonder if this Template is going a little too far.. it is bigger than the content on most of the pages it links to -- Chuq 02:52, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: True.  I don't if it is a US-thing to just call them "Virgin Islands" and pretend the British ones don't exist.  I notice the Nations section under 2004 Summer Olympics has British Virgin Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Virgin Islands all listed!  This (and a few other country names) is something I should bring up under naming conventions -- Chuq 06:20, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Arm & Hammer

message: McGill university says that it can help reduce odor: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/general-science-you-asked/can-baking-soda-really-absorb-odors-fridge  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:D086:CC00:C9E6:A95D:449B:6DFB (talk) 01:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Baking soda in fridge

message: This line made me go "Huh?": The arm is composed of a left shoulder and a right hand — an anatomical impossibility.
How so? It looks like a right shoulder and right hand to me. 24.18.35.120 05:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left Shoulder and Right Hand? 
Talk:État québécois

message: Some also refer to our government as le garnement AlainV 03:30, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha. I heard "le gouverne-ment" ("govern-lies", for our english speaking friends reading), or "Premier minus" for "Premier Ministre" that Rock et Belles Oreilles used, but not this one. "Le garnement" is more apt than ever with the beloved government we currently have. :P --Liberlogos 23:38, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: The article repeatedly mentions the phrase province de Québec. Isn't the correct French phrase province du Québec?  I was taught that de Québec means "of Quebec City" and du Québec means "of Quebec [province]".--Indefatigable 15:04, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You were taught right; text corrected. --Valmi ✒ 16:02, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: With due respect, this is grammatical nonsense. If you'd say au Québec then you have to say du Québec. On the other hand saying de Québec implies that you'd say à Québec. Compare le français du Québec and le français de Québec. --Valmi ✒ 19:36, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: The province is named after the city, not the other way round. Although «Province du Québec» does occur, «Province de Québec» is more common and is also the form found in official documents. It follows logically because it means (or at least meant originally) «Province administrée de (Ville) Québec». Peter Grey 22:00, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Province (de|du) Québec 

message: This page was listed on votes for deletion.  Please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/État québécois for the results of the debate. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:17, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes for deletion results 

message: I removed from the "Reasons" section: "This was consistent with the Quiet Revolution, presented by many of its proponents and architects as a process of decolonization" because it makes no sense. A. Lafontaine 15:05, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I put back the sentence you removed. The parallel to decolonization was a major theme in the 60s and 70s. See  for a few examples. UnHoly 02:29, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Decolonization

message: My feeling is that this term is used by federalists as much as sovereigntists. The meaning of "État" here is simply the "State" as opposed to private entities and the federal government. The whole thing about how people use the expression because they think Quebec "ought to be" an independent state rings false to me. The reason nationalists are likely to say that the strengthening of the Quebec government is a good thing is because historically they've viewed it as defending francophone interests better than the federal government or the private sector. But that doesn't mean that their name for the Quebec state is different than that of non-nationalists. There are no sources, so it's hard to tell. "Etat ontarien" turns up 70 hits on google, while "Etat canadien" gets 57,000. "Etat fédéral" is also common, but unfortunately has another meaning so it's hard to tell them apart. Joeldl 14:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-neutral unsourced content
Talk:Rear-wheel drive

message: Actually, maybe listing ANYTHING is stupid, it will just keep growing.  
The only justification I have for doing it is that there are so few out there, it's not really that hard to list them all.
:??? There are many, many, MANY RWD cars, and there's already a categories page dedicated to listing them.  A simple link from here would surely suffice?
:DeLarge 07:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I don't see why the opening sentence says "Rear-wheel drive ... was a common engine/transmission layout" etc. It still is common, especially with (a) manufacturers like BMW who use "handling/feel" as a selling point, and (b) manufacturers of any high-powered (250+hp) vehicles where fwd is impractical e.g. Porsche, Ferrari, BMW, Mercedes, etc etc.
DeLarge 07:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening paragraph

message: This is by far the greatest influence on the switch to fwd, and I therefore think it should be given greater prominence. Especially in European and Japanese vehicles, the majority are suited to fwd ~ they don't have sufficient power to demand rwd (i.e. 250hp+), and they're compact enough that a rwd layout would compromise interior space significantly.
DeLarge 07:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Costs
Talk:AFL-CIO

message: Does that mean that some (many? how many?) of its 12 million members do not live in the United States? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The AFL–CIO is a federation of international labor unions." 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: move. (closed by non-admin page mover)  feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 02:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: AFL–CIO →  – Not only does aflcio.org itself use the hyphen (meaning it is the official name), but MOS:ENBETWEEN states: Generally, use a hyphen in compounded proper names of single entities. AFL-CIO is not a partnership between two unions (which would be AFL–CIO), but the merger of the American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organizations—one entity. —theMainLogan (t•c) 12:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 August 2023
Talk:Surface energy

message: Several wiki pages (such as the "Wetting" page) state that the terms "Surface Tension" and "Surface Energy" are interchangeable.  With that in mind, is it really necessary to have a page on each? If the two terms are NOT interchangeable, then there needs to be some serious editing on these other pages to clarify which is which. Branfish 12:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surface Tension 

message: In the part concerning surface energy of solids, one finds the relation dG = -p dl + gamma dA : the first and last terms have the dimensionality of energy, while the second not.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.209.66.41 (talk) 14:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: P is the tension and has units of force (N).  dl has units of length (m).  The product is N-m (work) and has units of energy. Bbanerje (talk) 20:39, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 

message: Is there any litterature that I should look out for if I want to learn more about surface tension and surface energy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.103.154.77 (talk) 16:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further literature on the subject 

message: I'm not sure that the discussion on cutting apart a solid is helpful, it provides no intuition. The usual explanation for surface energy is not that the bonds have been mechanically ripped apart. Rather it is simply that the matter near the surface is unable to organize and bond in the same manner as it does in the bulk. (How it got there is unimportant.)
Also, sublimation and surface energy are two totally different things. --Nanite (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  cutting to make surfaces 

message: M 103.226.90.83 (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate change
Talk:Canada at the 2004 Summer Olympics

message: A lot of updating today!  Good stuff!  This page rocks.  dave 04:39, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yorkville, Oneida County, New York

message: Because of the existance of more than one Yorkville, New York (The other being a neighborhood in Manhattan), this page was moved from Yorkville, New York to Yorkville, Oneida County, New York. Yorkville, New York is now a disambig page. Kevyn 04:47, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Page
Talk:International Winter Sports Week

message: I'll need to fill in more details ; help would be appreciated.
132.205.45.148 04:55, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: More detail would be that only 1924 had an International Winter Sports Week. The Olympic Games do have a longer history where Wintersports are concerned, but only the International Winter Sports Week was held only once. Aliter 17:26, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:First Geneva Convention

message: Is it me or does this article completely not say what this convention actually does.  It describes the history and what it pertains to but not what the convention actually is, what protections it affords. 129.42.208.182 20:38, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text here says 16 states came together to sign the geneva convention. I make it 12. here's my source. http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/WebSign?ReadForm&id=120&ps=P 
Can't get much more authoritative than the ICRC itself when it comes to Geneva conventions. I would do it myself, but i'm sure someone would get shitty at me for not referncing it (as i don't know how). So i'm giving you the reference and you can do it yourself.130.195.86.40 05:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  12 States i think

message: Can someone please explain why the convention has red ink blotches?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.187.250.187 (talk) 00:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red spots on the convention 

message: I seem to remember a European reaction to Andersonville was a factor, however the timing is wrong. Clara Barton & Dorence Atwater are dated to 1865. An interesting but unverified URL is http://gothagepress.com/Geneva%20Convention%20History.htm 86.135.122.193 (talk) 05:32, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified but useful? 

message: Could someone find a place close to that nice map to put an explanation of the meaning of 'P' mentioned in that legend, as in "P I and III", etc.  There is no mention at all in the article of what is being referred to.  After wandering around a bit I finally figured out these must refer to the amendment protocols Protocol I, Protocol II, and Protocol III.  They were mentioned by full name in the template, but have a care for the non-expert in Geneva Conventions, hey? Shenme (talk) 02:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  P'ed off
Category talk:Dystopian films

message: I removed this category from :Category:Science fiction because not all dystopian films are SF (though by far the majority are), nor is there any necessary connection between dystopian fiction and SF (though there often is a connection).  I'm beginning to think that categories need something similar to articles' "See also" section - maybe "Related categories".  -Seth Mahoney 06:08, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
I would like to suggest that the movie Ghost in the Shell is included as a Dystopian film201.215.226.153 08:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dystopian films and Sci-Fi
Talk:Lichfield Cricket Club

message: For an August 2004 deletion debate over this page, then named "Three spires" see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Three spires
----
Moved page from ambiguous title Three Spires to Lichfield Cricket Club which is more concrete.Giano 07:11, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Source was supplied to me by a sockpuppet, but I won't begrudge anyone else from using it. They wanted to add Keith Miller as playing in the Chauntry Cup. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another source
Talk:Personnel Armor System for Ground Troops Helmet

message: Hang on! It's only a couple of minutes old and I'm working on it! 213.206.33.82 07:21, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: I don't see the need for a merger quite frankly. --Sus scrofa 19:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Personnel Armor System for Ground Troops Vest]]
Talk:Recruit (company)

message: to communications (magazine publishing and web site); cannot find support for real estate. Can anyone confirm that? Fg2 07:55, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
They sold real estate and telecommunication business sectors. Their business today focuses on communication.  Yoshi1215 (talk) 18:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed ''telecommunications'' 

message: Indeed's page says the site is a subsidiary of Recruit.  If true, that fact should be added to this page.  -KaJunl (talk) 02:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indeed.com? 

message: The last Overview updates come from 2012-13, and there has been some updates regarding Recruit, though I am not qualified to write on this subject.
--EdgeOfSzon (talk) 13:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating
Talk:Hymen (god)

message: Ovid's Medea is lost. An odd reference. Wetman 08:22, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I don't think the etymology is correct for those words. Hymen ultimately comes from Proto-Indo-European *syuh₁- (cognates include Sanskrit स्यूमन् (syū́man), Old Prussian schumeno, and Hittite šumanza), while hymn ultimately comes from Proto-Indo-European *sh₂em (“sing”) (cognate with Hittite išḫamai, "he sings", and Sanskrit सामन् (sāman, “song”)). 94.211.59.112 (talk) 21:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it. Can't find either source in any case, and I wouldn't use the Britannica or a random website for this. Dougweller (talk) 13:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hymn and hymen 
Talk:Liberalism in the Czech Republic

message: Why does this page need a clean up? Gangulf 10:18, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's not very well formatted and hard to read, in my opinion. I'm sure it could be formatted better. Darksun 10:25, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: The article is about an entirely undefined subject. Link to the general meaning of liberal party or liberalism does not help, since  liberal can mean almost anything to the right of communism and left of fascism in different countries. Why is for example Civic Democratic Party not liberal? (I do not say it is, but it also "claims that defence of individual liberties is the purpose of the state".
Georgius
:Please see the discussion in Liberalism. The Civic Democratic Party feels very much at home in the conservative family (where it belongs). Gangulf 22:15, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition? 

message: I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I guess so, although potentially delete with RFD
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback from New Page Review process
Talk:Koreatown, Toronto

message: It might also be Bloor and Manning for the commercial area, but the whole of North York and Markham must have the higher densities of Korean residents. I suggest they get a mention.--Oldontarian (talk) 18:57, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Koreatown, Toronto? 

message: I don't think you should change it --Vlad  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.189.17.19 (talk) 04:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice short description LOL