Talk:Sonia Nazario

message: Sonia's work is not most recently as a project reporter for the Times. That is outdated. She is a contributing opinion writer at the New York Times. Her column is here: https://www.nytimes.com/column/sonia-nazario. 
I have several other updates I would like to request, but I'll start with this one to see how it works. I have a lot of updates I could make with proper citations that will improve this page without bias. Is there a way I can make the edits all myself and just have an admin check that they are accurate and unbiased? Sarahisacarpenter (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't need an administrator to review your edits; that can be done by any editor.  If you would prefer to draft your changes and have them reviewed first, before they are put in the article, you can draft them here and make a formal edit request(click for instructions). 331dot (talk) 01:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating this page 

message: * Thank you for submitting your edit request. In reviewing that request, it was noted that clarifications needed to be provided in two areas before any changes could be considered:
# Many of the claims do not contain ref tags. When proposing edit requests, it is important to highlight in the text, through the use of ref tags, which specific sources are doing the referencing for each claim. The point of these ref tags is to allow the reviewer and readers to check that the material is sourced; that point will be lost if the references are not clearly placed.
# Other claims involving awards received do not contain Wikilinks. When an award has its own page in Wikipedia, the award mentioned here in this article should contain a wikilink to that award page.
*As Wikipedia is a volunteer project, edit requests such yours are generally expected to have the formatting of ref tags and Wikilinks done before the request is submitted for review. To that end, I have provided examples in the collapsed section below to help with the placement of ref tags and Wikilinks. The first example shows how the edit request was submitted without ref tags; the second shows how requests should be submitted using ref tags. The third example shows how to place Wikilinks.
 
The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles, while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles. The Sun's temperature is 5,778 Kelvin.
In the example above there are no ref tags within the text. Your edit request similarly does not provide ref tags indicating which source goes with which part of the text. The links between material and their source references must be clearly made, as shown in the next example below:
The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 Kelvin.[3]
References
----
^ https://www.wikipedia.org
^ https://www.wikimedia.org
^ https://www.wiktionary.org
In the example above the links between the provided references and their claim statements are perfectly clear.
To place ref tags, place  &  at either ends of the URL:
The full citation then displays at the bottom like so:
----
----
----
----
To place a Wikilink, simple insert double brackets on either side of the award's name, like so:
* Please feel free to re-submit the edit request at your earliest convenience once this formatting is completed. Please be sure to place the revised text at the bottom of the talk page in a new edit request. Text which was previously placed above should not be altered. Thank you! Regards,  Spintendo  04:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If I put  around two or more pieces of text within a sentence or paragraph, how will you know which claim corresponds to which reference? Still trying to figure out, this is my first attempt at Wikipedia edits Sarahisacarpenter (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 20-NOV-2019

message: Apart from desiring the material be pre-formatted to aid the person doing the insertion, I have some other questions or observations about the requested changes.  Disclaimer: I don't normally work on biographies and am not very experienced in the intricies of this area.  My thoughts are coming from a more general angle of article structure and balance, not detailed knowledge of BLP policy.  
Have refactored the subheads slightly, and have posted comments into each section above.  Will hold off from Echo (ping) notifications until after I'm done.  
Pelagic (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. Thanks for signing each section, Sarah: that makes it easier for me to interleave replies. Pelagic (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your comments! Sarahisacarpenter (talk) 19:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Another reply 2019-11-23