Talk:Bulletproof glass

message: Added techical detail on one-way bulletproof glass and other names of Lexan, somebody may want to include pictures or more text --Opqdonut 15:16, 2004 Jun 21 (UTC)
:Cyrolon, Lexan and Tuffak are all different materials arn't they? I have listed them as alternative products during a grammar tidy up of the introduction section. Canderra 03:04, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: Is this material really 70-75mm thick? That's about three inches. I think it's off by a factor of ten. User:Keno 22:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this material is 70-75mm thick, and thicker (more than a 100mm) for requirements greater than the published standards.68.82.168.240 (talk) 21:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  70-75mm thick? 

message: I'm not aware of NIJ threat levels over IV existing. I think these are all UL standards for stationary armor. I've put dubious - discuss tags on them for the time being. 3AlarmLampscooter (talk) 00:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NIJ threat levels in "construction" section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Bulletproof glass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110830190639/http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com:80/2011/05/ceramic-transparent-armor-may-replace-bullet-proof-glass/ to http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/05/ceramic-transparent-armor-may-replace-bullet-proof-glass/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Bulletproof glass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140501104651/http://www.usarmorllc.com/Military_Vehicles.html to http://usarmorllc.com/Military_Vehicles.html
*Added  tag to http://www.smf.phy.cam.ac.uk/Publications/Strength%20papers/574StrWalleyIJIE30.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820004851/http://www.marsarmor.com/Technical%20Info/EN1063.pdf to http://www.marsarmor.com/Technical%20Info/EN1063.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110626221047/http://www.armorcore.com/docs/UL_752_Specification.pdf to http://www.armorcore.com/docs/UL_752_Specification.pdf
*Added  tag to https://aais.ria.army.mil/AAIS/award_web_09/W52H0909A00030000/Award_attach/Attach1.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110626022255/http://www.justnet.org/Lists/JUSTNET%20Resources/Attachments/1281/0108.01.pdf to http://www.justnet.org/Lists/JUSTNET%20Resources/Attachments/1281/0108.01.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "The picture on the right shows how the bullet is embedded between the glass and the polycarbonate."
Where is this picture?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.136.206.153 (talk) 10:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing picture 

message: Article was moved from Stub to Start status because it has a significant amount of information and multiple references.  In addition, the main article has not had a Stub tag for some time.  Araesmojo (talk) 20:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub to Start 

message: Section "Air chamber glass" says:
"The weight reduction over traditional glass-clad polycarbonate is 35%, weighing 0.25 kilogram per square meter for ... ": The percentage of 35% should result in more zehn 250 gramms per square meter. 46.114.6.63 (talk) 11:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency for value (0.25 kilogram per square meter)