Talk:West African Vodun

message: We have noticed that the original article that we published has been deleted. The current historical information concerning the origins of Vodoun is incorrect and its definition is inaccurate. It is clear that Wikipedia is not interested in historical accuracy, but rather what is politically correct to justify Western, European inclusion of themselves in an ancient religion of which they are not ancestrally rooted, nor experientially knowledgeable. We have noticed this neo-colonial revisionist’s pattern concerning several of the major religions originating from Africa and brought to the New World exclusively by Africans. We will not even attempt to argue or impose historical accuracy into this article. You may have at it. We are making this point only for the record. Those seeking truth will find ours and other websites authored by African and Diaspora historians and practitioners in the search engines. The historical deteroiation of this and other pertinent articles has already garnered  Wikipedia an unreliable source for students and researchers.
Anagossii--74.229.102.208 (talk) 12:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They were probably considered link spam. There are lots of junk links added to the vodun articles. If we got over-zealous in removing yours, my apologies. Also, if you have referenced, scholarly material to add, I'd be ecstatic to have it. However, we do not allow original research. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to publish a thesis. kwami (talk) 21:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I just took a look. The first was a bad link--it's a blank page. The second is rather specialized, in that it does not deal with vodun as a whole, but on diaspora vodun. We have a separate article on that. The link is fine here, since it ties the two together, but it's generally frowned upon to put a link to your organization at the top of the list, as if you were more important than everyone else. It's arrogant, and may be why it was deleted. kwami (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

text: BTW, you're also adding your comments to the top of the page. No-one reads the stuff at the top of the page. kwami (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of original article

message: This was at the very top of the article, and I removed it- if anyone wants to do anything with it, please do.
A Simple Understanding to Voodoo
Voodoo is a religion commonly used by African-Americans in the southern states of the U.S.A and Haiti, which are only 2 out of quite a few places.
It is often pictured as a sinister religion when actually it is not, it is fully established in Western countries of Africa. 
It's often mistaken as Hoodoo, which is very different. Hoodoo is a practice, and Voodoo is a religion. 
So called Voodoo dolls are not actually associated with Voodoo but are a part of Hoodoo.
I hope this will be read so that the religion and its followers  can be respected and understood.
Squeedlyspooch 19:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic explanations

message: I object to the removal of the reference to Queer people and replacing it with the term homosexual and am restoring the reference. The terms are not synonyms -- Queer is more inclusive than homosexual, including transgenders, hermaphrodites, and other genderal and sexual identities and orientations. Also to gay people, gay is the preferred term. Homosexual more properly describes sexual acts than personal identity, and that paragraph was about identity, not sexual acts. As everyone knows, people with non-gay identities can engage in homosexual acts. Mike Rock
----
I don't think the author of this entry is qualified at all for it.  First of all, African Vodou is *not* an obviously syncretistic religion at all; Haitian Vodou is.  The syncretism is the common African/popular Catholic sort found as well in Cuba or Brazil.  The part that goes "Each Vodun sect follows a different Loa (or Lwa, "mystery"), again confuses African and New World Vodou: the "sects" are an African concept, based on ancestor worship, while the identification of lwa with saints is a New World concept, where the religion syncretises with popular Catholicism.  Also, Rada and Petro (concepts which the article does not identify as Haitian) are distorted beyond recognition by labeling them as "good" and "evil".  The words denote the major groupings of lwa within the religion; the Rada lwa are the major ones, which have a more generally "pleasant" quality to them, dealing with domains such as courage, love, farming.  The Petro are "darker" and more unpredictable, and deal with things such as death.  However, the Rada are quite capable of being nasty to you if you don't serve them right, and the Petro will be nice to you if you do; these are not good or evil beings, they are simply beings which represent more or less pleasant or virtuous aspects of life.
The best books for Haitian Vodou are Alfred Métraux's ethnnography of the religion, from the mid 1950's in its French version and with a more recent English translation, and the much more easy to read "Mama Lola" by Karen McCarthy Brown.
: If you think there are mistakes and errors in this page, why not edit it and correct them? Jeronimo
----
To whoever created the articles on houngan and mambo - the articles do not say anything that the originating article on Voodoo doesn't already state. Hence there is no reason to create them. If there is a clear and valid reason for writing a separate article about these two roles that will present information not contained in this article, then do so, otherwise please leave them as is. Mambo is also a perfectly valid topic (the music/dance form) in it's own right, so it doesn't need a fallacious link. - MMGB
----
The name Vodun is derived from the local african word for spirit, and can be traced about 6.000 years back.
:What does this mean? That the word is attested in this usage (describing the religion) in documents from circa 4000 BC? Or that some linguist has estimated the existence of a protolanguage with an ancestor of the word "vodun" meaning something like "spirit" circa 4000 BC? Or, something else entirely? -- Brion VIBBER
**It means it was made up. Doovinator
-------
Need to merge Voudun and Vodun
:Still need to merge. Nov 27 2002
----
Isn't this more commonly known as Voodoo? I had to admit my ignorance but I'd never heard of these variations. If this is so, shouldn't the article be moved to Voodoo?
-----
I have attempted to merge the former Voudun here, and shuffle the two texts together as best as I was able, with some minor editing to avoid duplications.  -- IHCOYC 19:57 Mar 3, 2003 (UTC)
----
I don't know enough about the topic to write an article (although it would make for an interesting study, and a first contribution to Wik), but "voodoo dolls" are also referred to as "poppets" (at least in the U.S.), and they are still used. See for example http://www.angelfire.com/realm2/amethystbt/poppets.html RL Barrett 17:14 May 6, 2003 (UTC)
:See Poppet; also see Voodoo#Myths and misconceptions. Fuzzypeg☻ 05:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Queer people reference

message: I'm going to move this page to voodoo based on the following evidence that "voodoo" is the more common term, even when referring to the Beninese religion: . Here, "Voodoo" seems to be at least 6 times more common than "Vodun" on pages that contain "Benin" and "religion". Nohat 20:13, 2004 Apr 23 (UTC)
:a good decision, in line w the naming conventions. I assume they felt that vodun was less contentious however. Sam Spade 20:26, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Voodoo and Vudu are ['vu.du]. Vodun is [vo.'dun] (originally ). kwami 21:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: rename of page

message: Maybe I misunderstood but it seems to me that in the opening paragraphs it says 7 million people practise Voodoo worldwide and then under "African Origins" it mentions 30 million in the west African region. Which is correct?
- Actually the 7 million figure Iused applies to Haiti and its diaspora. The 30 million used by a writer to the African roots section appears to refer to the population of Benin. - Mike Rock
- Oh wait I went back and reread, and I meant the 7 million to apply to Benin, I got that info from the CIA information page on Benin at the time. It is the population of Benin itself, and Voodoo is the official religion of Benin. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bn.html - the author of the 30 million figure may be referring to the entire region of West Africa, as Voodoo is not limited just to Benin but spills into Nigeria and Ghana etc.Mike Rock
:Vodun may be a 'national' religion of Benin, but it is in no way official. It's practiced by somewhat more than half the population, but probably less than two thirds: about 15% are Christian (though many of the Beninese "Christians" I have spoken to have added Jesus to a vodun pantheon), 12% Muslim, and not all indigenous religion in Benin is vodun. 
:Also, the first international vodun conference held in Ouidah in 1991 was attended chiefly by Fon and Yoruba speakers, and indeed these were the two languages used for the presentations. I know little of Yoruba religion, but wonder if maybe the Yoruba should be included among the people who practice vodun. The only way you're going to get 30M vodunists in W Africa is if you include the Yoruba, though I suspect the figure must be exaggerated regardless. kwami 21:30, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  7 or 30,000,000? 

message: Some categories associated with Voodoo are 'Category:Vodun deities' and the two pendant categories 'Category:Vodun gods' and 'Category:Vodun goddesses'. The spelling of Vodun indicates Benin, but most of the names listed here are Haitian lwa - and in Haiti at least the lwa aren't strictly considered 'gods'. Perhaps 'divinities' would be better? I also note at least one female lwa has gone under the gods rather than the goddesses; 'divinities' would avoid this confusion. The most useful way of organising would be to have a main category Voodoo divinities containing categories Benin Vodun divinities, Haitian Vodou loa, etc., and even sub-categories such as for the different Haitian nations of lwa... however I don't know if that's quite how Wikipedia intended their category system to be used. I don't know how to go about changing category names, So I'll just leave this as a suggestion for the moment... Fuzzypeg 12:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories could be better organised? 

message: Someone said it earlier, and I think it is still relevant: what is the difference between Lukumi and Voodoo /Vodun? Lukumi and Voodoo are both listed as being derived from the Yoruba peoples, yet no distinction is made in the article between them. Are they the same religion called something different in varying regions? Also, how are they related to Candomble, Umbanda, Macumba, Quimbanda and the religion Yoruba? Should these other entries be merged, or listed under African religions, or what? If not please explain the differences if you are able in the entry. *Hint* I'm not writing a paper or essay on this subject. I am looking at it solely from the POV of a Wikipedia editor and the fact that this issue is not addressed is confusing to readers. If no one editing the entry knows, I'm going to throw a request for an  expert template on the respective page(s). WeniWidiWiki 16:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: Someone inserted this statement: "Since Vodou has such a community orientation, it is sometimes seen as an extention of the beleifs in the old Soviet Union, and, since the dissolution of the USSR, has drawn many Russian initiates." I would either like to see this statement backed up with a citation, or have it removed as a non-sequitur. Mike Rock
Mike, this is vandalism. I saw the same thing recently in the hoodoo page where someone added that the Louis Armstrong song "Wonderful World" contained "invocations to the Loas" and othe bullshit. (See the hoodoo talk page for details).  There are people just yanking othes' chains. Get the username or IP address, log it here and if the same name shows up doing lots of similar vandalism, they'll be booted. Catherineyronwode 20:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voodoo in Russia?

message: I added the tag to the section on Neopaganism.  The wording on that is beyond the pale of neutrality, it's a completely value laden statement.--Vidkun 01:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Catherine, we get the same thing with Wicca.  On the Afro-Carribean/Diasporic side of things, I know of a young woman (I don't exactly know what "level" she is at) who practices Palo (Christiano or Judeo I'm not sure which), who was recently denied something she needed for sacrifice at a botanika in Jersey City.  Why?  Because she is too white, and dressed too goth.  Hell, she is in a band, and those are her normal clothes.  She is a Cubana, who evidently "passes" . . . so, I guess I understand the issue, but, sometimes it can go too far, you know?--Vidkun 02:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Catherine, it was a shop that was Palo friendly, this girl's godfather goes there.  Much of this is excerpted from her account:  She walked into the polleria, wearing a black hoodie, high boots, nose ring, dyed hair and camo pants. She was denied the sale of live birds for no discernable reason - denied at a place that her godfather regularly purchases birds at.  "We don't sell live birds to customers," the man said as they sold a live bird to another customer.  She was shorter and darker skinned than my friend was and spoke spanish to him. Maybe she should have spoken spanish instead of english.  Regarding giving her lineage, I think mortification prevented her:  she was not about to unzip her hoodie and flash her necklaces - how gaudy. They sell to all the babalawos in town, all the brujos and brujas. --Vidkun 20:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|NPOV-section}} 

message: I'm taking a class in Caribbean Religions and my professor claims that it is offensive to use the term Voodoo. It's essentially the Hollywood word for the religion. Acceptable versions of the word include: Vodou(preferred), Vodoun, Vodu and Vodun. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fredwk4 (talk • contribs) 08:36, 9 May 2006  (UTC)
:A statement by your professor, reported by you, is not a verifiable source which meets Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources. Please feel free to find such a source and post here on the talk page for discussion. As a reminder, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~. KillerChihuahua?!? 09:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonetheless, the term voodoo is offensive; the name of the religion is Vodou, Vodun or Vodoun. Here are two references for this fact.  . By Googlehits, Vodou is by far the most common of the three terms. I'll be submitting a move request. -999 22:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 07:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vodou 

message: :"However, because the Vodou deities are thought to be born to each African clan-group . . . . "
I don't quite understand what this is supposed to mean. What does it mean for a deity to be "born to" a clan-group? — Amcaja 17:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born to a clan-group? 

message: This article still leaves a lot to be desired, and the spellings that are being used are not what is currently put forth by academicians. Please remember that while ethnographies of african diasporic religious groups are over a hundred years old, discourse on the subject is a recent happening.
With the publication of several dissertations in the last two years, and four recent scholarly works on the subject of voodoo in the U.S., it is time to come to some consensus over naming conventions.
These are the generally accepted spellings:
Voodoo - African diasporic spirituality practiced in the U.S.
Vodou - the religion as practiced in Haiti
Vodu(n) - African religion of Benin and as practiced in Togo.
Voodoo is a social construction. The term seems to be used as an umbrella for a wide variety of beliefs and practices - a few of which seem to have rather spurious roots.
Haitian Vodou has been well documented since the thirties. See Harold Courlander, Melville J. Herskovits, Zora Neale Hurston, Katherine Dunham, and Maya Deren.
National Geographic has done a wonderful job of documenting Vodou in both Benin and Togo over the years. Also see Robert Farris Thompson for art history and religious symbolism in these cultures.
Dglossop 01:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming conventions 

message: Aaargh!  We discussed this and we came up with a consensus to move Voodoo here, to Vodou, and redirect Voodoo to Vodou.  Now I find that there is an article at Voodoo, with different material, posing a challenge of integration.  Was there some sort of discussion which I don't see here on the talk page about splitting the article in some way?  Or did someone just take it upon themselves to create a new article on Voodoo?  I'm confused.  Kasreyn 02:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, let's discuss major changes to the organisation of information before implementing them. I appreciate the desire to separate three traditions, as well as the popular or fictional accounts of voodoo, but I think there's a better way to do it. It doesn't make much sense to me to have readers type in "voodoo" in the search box and be struck with an extended discussion on spelling. I'd rather see one article as an overview, named Vodou (as per consensus above), with all spellings (voodoo, vodun etc) made into redirects to this article. Then, if desired, more detail could be provided at articles such as Vodou (Haiti), Vodun (Benin), etc. ntennis 03:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't agree more.  :)  Kasreyn 08:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, I'm one of those people who typed in "Voodoo" in the search box, hoping to find an informative article on the religion. Instead, I find an article that spends five or six disorganized introductory paragraphs talking about word usage issues. I would recommend moving any useful content at voodoo to this article and then creating a redirect. Serpent-A 22:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voodoo article? 

message: Since this article is about that, perhaps it should be moved to "Haitian Vodou" or "Vodou in Haiti"? —Ashley Y 07:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is Vodou really noteworthy enough to merit multiple articles?  Because of course what you are proposing is really a split, not just a move.  Kasreyn 07:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Why was the primary article on Vodou switched  from "Vodou" its proper etymology to "Voodoo" a derogatory name, and "Vodou"  confined to strictly Haiti? What the heck is going-on here?  VODOU is an AFRICAN ANCESTRAL/DIASPORA RELIGION, and must be respected and categorized in its rightful historical place.  What is needed is a  separate category etc.,Non-Diaspora Haitian Vodou, Non-Traditional Vodou, Euro-Voodoo, New Age Voodoo, Wiccan Voodoo, Thelema Voodoo etc., or something similar, and not western revisionists Vodou.  Serious consideration should be given to this suggestion.Anagossii,23:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to "Haitian Vodou"? 

message: I am requesting to move or revert the original AFRICAN/DIASPORA ANCESTRAL RELIGION  "Vodou" article back to its Afro-Diaspora "Vodou" title, and the non-Diaspora Voodoo aherents who are unwilling to respect this, to create for themselves another category i.e.,non-Diaspora Haitian Voodoo, Wicca-Voodoo, Euro-Voodoo, etc.,. Again, serious consideration must be given to the creation of a separate section  on “Vodoun/Vodou” , where the legitamte lineage heirs in the African-American Diaspora  can publish their own perspectives and research findings on their African/Diaspora Ancestral Religions. Afro-Diaspora religion should be the place where the African/Diaspora benefactors contributions of their religious clergy and scholars can be presented as it relates to their own African ancestral history and spiritual lineages. If there is no feedback on this, I will revert or move the page as was originally voted Anagossii 13:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert or Move Vodou back to Afro-Diaspora

message: I added a cleanup tag. First, there is WAY too much emphasis on Vodou in the United States, compared to the number of practitioners there vs. the number in other places. Second, the writing in different parts of the article needs to be checked and brought to meet the manual of style. It seems like some of the historical sections can be merged together, though I'll leave that in the hands of those who know more about the subject.--Cúchullain t/c 20:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is 0wned by the MWHS. There's nothing we can do. - ∅ (∅), 08:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The MWHS has made no such claim on any wiki-article. We too agree that the article can  be improved. However, we feel there is WAY too much overemphasis on Haitian Vodou, as oppose to a comprehensive overview of the history and practice of Vodoun in the Afro-Diaspora to include Cuba, the Carribean, South America and other places. In time, we believe the article will be improved. Anagossii--MWHS 04:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It cound be imporoved if you laid your hands off it. Fact is, your editing style is a mess, while your stuborness keeps other editors from contributing. I appologize if I seam to be rude, but I don't know how else to put it. --Qyd 15:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately, your recommendation, as has been most of your comments, is not a constructive option. The article  was in serious need of editing prior to our contributions. We may appear stubborn when it come to historical facts, and fending off modern day revisionist, but we are open and cooperative when it comes to editing suggestions and constructive advice of which there has been nil.   Since we do plan to continue to contribute, we have no problem working with more skilled editors who display the necessary respect and civility required in order to  foster a healthy editor/contributor relationship. Thus far, there are (and has been)none.Anagossii--MWHS 23:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, but I've tried to be reasonable (look at your talk page, your sandbox, etc). Would you please consider, for just one second, that what you do is wrong? --Qyd 02:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

text: We have reviewed the talk page, and do see one post by you. Again, we are new to Wiki and only recently discovered features such as the “talk page” and “sandbox.” It is possible that by the time we did discover it, you and perhaps others, had already become frustrated and assumed that we were not willing to be cooperative.  We are noticing that oftentimes, editors who have developed some proficiency at Wiki, lack the patience with those of us who are still learning our way around its many unique and wonderful features.  Our advice would be that you not become angry and frustrated, and assume the worst.  A more productive approach would be to make a note to us in the discussion page, ex. there is a message on your talk page for you,” etc.,.  This would be helpful to all newcomers as they become accustomed to Wiki protocol.  Lastly, just as you claim no editors allegedly wants to touch the articles we have contributed , this perception works both ways. There are an equal number of people who would like to contribute but sense a fierce ownership of these articles by the more established editors as well.  It is good to  remind ourselves that we all bring to the table our own unique talents, life experience and unique ways in which we view the world.  We believe that a compromise can be achieved during this adjustment phase.  Our experience has taught us that that the  best approach is to remain respectful (not patronizing), patient and civil. This approach is especially helpful to newcomers. Anything less, will only yield the same unproductive results. Anagossii--MWHS 13:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're saying you never noticed the yellow bar that notifies you of new messages that appears on top of every page you visit and stays there until you've visited your talk page? - ∅ (∅), 17:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text:  Our page does not have (or we have not noticed)  a yellow bar. It was actually quite by accident that we even noticed the  "new message" alert in very small red print in the very far right hand top of our talkpage. Anagossii--MWHS 01:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This needs to be presented simply as belief, rather than (as it is) somewhere between belief and fact. Because it isn't factual. 196.25.255.250 21:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, to use a British term, complete bollocks. I've removed the section altogether. - ∅ (∅), 23:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And we have replaced it because we have studied our own ancient spiritual history and know it to be true. However, we do not mind prefacing it with "belief" to comply with NPOV. It was not too long ago when the British were demonizing Vodou and other African religions as the "cults of primitive savages."  It would prove more respectful to ask for references so that you just might learn something.Anagossiii--MWHS 01:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reading this article, i've found no mention of Vodou being originated in Mesapotamia or Ancient Greece. Indeed, the section is not sourced at all. I support User:Ante Aikio's action. -- Szvest - Wiki me up ® 13:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've met scholars in Togo who believe similar things, and that the Ewe are the lost tribe of Israel and that Ewe inscriptions have been found in the pyramids. This strikes me as an attempt to justify beliefs slandered by the colonial authorities in the context of the colonial (French Christian) culture. It is only found among people who have been highly educated in the colonial (or post-colonial) educational system, and who seem to be struggling to integrate being African with their European education, in an attempt to restore pride in who they are. It has no foundation in Vodun; uneducated people do not share this insecurity, as their sense of self worth does not depend on being accepted by Europeans. kwami (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancient Origins

message: This article seems to have serious problems: there's a lot of rather strange-looking stuff that is both unsourced and written in an unencyclopedic style. This would need thorough reworking. --194.89.3.31 17:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very true. This article is a mess, a ghastly horrendous mess. - ∅ (∅), 13:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right. I just deleted a long passage which full of wild claims and unsourced opinions - it seemed to be so bizarre original research and so unencyclopedic in style that I guess not much else could have been done about it. This article would need to be thoroughly revised by someone who is an expert on the topic; any idea what could be done about this? --AAikio 11:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There wasn't much else anyone could have done about it, I agree. - ∅ (∅), 22:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed tag 

message: It seems there is a history of the article on Voodoo/Vodou/Vodoun going back and forth, redirect here, then redirect there. Like it or not, most people think of the spelling as "Voodoo," even though many adherents dislike that spelling for it's "Hollywood bogeyman-zombie" image. But the article for Voodoo and this one currently have a lot of the same information. I think Wikipedia could have either one article that shows the different aspects of Vodou from Haiti to Hollywood, or have a disambiguation linking to the separate ones. Toyalla 08:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't Voodoo my Vodou

message: I've taken the liberty of removing Mwhs' old POV fork from the start of this talk page. It's still here if anyone needs it. - ∅ (∅), 21:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV fork 

message: "Vodou" is simply French/Haitian for English "Voodoo". That's a different religion than West African vodun. Therefore I propose that we move this article to Vodun, to help keep the distinction clear, since no one was in favor of merging the two articles. kwami 01:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Voodoo (disambiguation) already exists. See my move proposal here (sorry, didn't notice yours.) :-) - ∅ (∅), 07:48, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  move? 

message: I was going to cite it on Yahoo! Answers to clear up a misconception about 'Voodoo Dolls', and now there's no reference on here.--Jcvamp (talk) 09:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check Louisiana Voodoo or Haitian Vodou. I was thinking this article should be renamed West African Vodun, just to keep things clear. kwami (talk) 16:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the 'Myths and Misconceptions' section? 

message: Someone changed the spellings, and added 'Voudaux'. I'm only getting two Google hits on that, both quotes from the 19th century - hardly seems notable. kwami (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voudaux 

message: I am not comfortable relying upon the African Holocaust website as a source. It does not cite evidence and is very polemical. After researching for a while, I added two new academic sources justifying the comment that the Diasporic vodun-derived religions have Kongo influences and justifying the existence of the Ouidah festival. 
Can someone take the lead on finding a reputable source discussing the origins in West Africa of vodun and also for the suppression of vodun? That second comment will need to be unpacked as there are many actors, places and variations of vodun involved, not all of which fall under the purview of this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiggin01 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The more sources the better, but I dont think the info will conflict. More sources saying the same thing only further prove validity of what is being said. And let the sources come from a diverse place because I have always note how on wikipedia if the source is African its R.S. is questioned. When it is a guy from Scotland writing all of a sudden he is to be trusted on African spirituality.  What I find more problematic (and hence the tags) is the comfort with an entire section which is not referenced to anything. --Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sources needed 

message: editor deleted this book b/c the book references Agency in Africa.--Inayity (talk) 06:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Another book of Haiti's Vodou-Christian Faith: African and Catholic Origins --Inayity (talk) 06:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Esoteric Codex: Haitian Vodou  By Garland Ferguson deleted 

message: A discussion thread about the reliability and notability of this author and his pages is taking place at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Owen 'Alik Shahadah, please comment there so we can get a final consensus. Rupert Loup (talk) 12:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owen 'Alik Shahadah 

message: I'm copying this here from Talk:Fon people so it has more of a chance of being answered. In Fon people, the religion section says:
:The Supreme Being of the Fon is Mawu-Lisa.
and
:Fon religion is polytheistic, with a supreme (but not omnipotent) deity known as Nana Buluku.
Can someone explain whether these are contradictory statements? Marnanel (talk) 13:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  They sure sound like they can't both be correct. The whole article is very poorly sourced and in need of a massive overhaul. I suggest cutting both mentions and replicating it here on talk until it can be accurately determined. Bangabandhu (talk) 16:46, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mawu-Lisa versus Nana Buluku 

message: Especially the Relationship to Bo -section has some clear factual errors:
Bokonon is not a priest of Bo. Bokonon is the priest who does Fa -consultations. Fa (Ifa, Afa) is the traditional divination method. People (also christians) go to Bokonon to have a Fa-divination before every important decision in their life.
Vondunsi is not a female priestess. Vodunsi is adept of vodun, a person (female or male) that has spend a certain amount of time in the convent. Vodunsi translated means "wife of the Vodun".
The section speaks of loas. Loas are in Haiti, not in West Africa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.251.123.163 (talk) 17:34, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to Bo -section 

message: The first section currently has the title "Theology and Practice (False Religion)". Is the parenthetical judgement appropriate or acceptable? It doesn't appear NPOV to me.
Josepheh (talk) 04:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "False Religion"? 

message: The statements under Demographics, apparently from the CIA Fact Book, are misleading, as anyone who has spent any considerable time Benin will be aware. The two main ethnic religions are Vodou and Orisha, but due to similarities they are both referred to generically as Vodou or (Vodun). There is also a saying common in Benin that the country is "70% Christian, 30% Muslim and 100% Vodou". These are approximate percentages but reflect the fact that many Christians or Muslims will go to see the Vodou Hounon (priest) after going to church or whatever but not refer to themselves as having any allegiance with Vodou. Even those that "don't believe in Vodou" or have anything to do with it act quite differently at any suggestion that someone might have put a curse on them. The fact that Vodou is also formally recognised as a state religion in Benin should also be mentioned, as this is unlike any other country. Moreover, Vodou itself does not see itself as a religion, simply as cause and effect. Describing itself as a 'religion' arose in order to make it sound more acceptable to outsider.
btw The wrangling over spelling is mostly down to a matter of pronunciation, translating the spoken word into French and then English. The ending of the word is nasalised, whichever spelling is used, and this is different to the sound of the word "voodoo" as mostly found in the diaspora.
Parzivalamfortas 15:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  demographics 

message: I know nothing about this. But it seems odd that a woman who spent a year researching it is given such prominence on the meaning of the religion. And her paper isnt linked. Just seems weird. 
according to Suzanne Preston Blier, who undertook a year of research in 1985-86 in Abomey and the nearby area, highlights the importance of remaining calm in contexts of difficulty and in life more generally. According to Suzanne Preston Blier, Vodun means, “the idea of staying close to a water source, to not rush through life, to take time to attain tranquility.” Her interpretation stems 50.47.86.129 (talk) 09:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blier interpretations seem suspect