Talk:Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macau Bridge

message: hey people i would like to add some pics in the article and since it would violate the copyright laws if i copy and paste another pic to this article, what do u guys say if i draw one and then scan it? --35ednalung
From the lecturer, this is OK. Go ahead please. --35patchau
Good idea, but i think it'll be a tough work for you. -- 36noelchan
Good suggestion, i think there is at least a picture about the proposed bridge location. So you are thinking about drawing a rough map including Hong Kong, Macau, Zhuhai?  -- 39kschan
Hi all, I have drawn one and scan it as picture shown in main page, any comments are welcome, and I can use the mother copy to make changes.
-- 39kschan
:Hi there. Please remember to use “~~~~” to sign your messages. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 12:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: pics

message: should the svg map image say "newly reclaimed land" because the airport is reclaimed, but it is not marked as reclaimed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:6100:1C9:41ED:D4FE:17E0:FF1A (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: map

message: Under "Background":
*The number of passengers can reach up to 400,000 during peak hours...
Is it 400,000 per hour?
*Continuous expansion works have been done at these three crossings to meet the increasing demand for passenger handling capacity.
Which three is it referring to? I'm guessing Man Kam To, Lok Ma Chau and Lo Wu, but it'd be better if they were specifically referred to in the article.
*Railway to the Lo Wu crossing receives much traffic from the towns.
Is it talking about the towns within Hong Kong?
- Hinto 21:46, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few questions 

message: The references in the Intro section were a bit messy so I just did a minor clean-up there. In the process I removed the (superfluous?) statement that the longest span is going to be "between the artificial islands containing the Macau exit of the tunnel and the Macau border facilities" because I couldn't find any handy references to support that claim. The original wording was a bit strange and I got the impression that the longest span is between two points on the Macau side, which obviously cannot be right. Besides, I found the content of that sentence to be out of place in the intro section. Further down would be fine though, if anyone can cough up a reference and a less confusing way to word it. Cheers. Meiyou (talk) 03:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Span lengths 

message: and left hand drive (HK) on the bridge is not mentioned. Is this concept approved yet? -Scriberius (talk) 20:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: They could do (or would already by now have) something that's already established. invenio tc 14:55, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Managing [[Right hand drive]] (mainland PR China) 

message: Someone interested in this subject may want to create an article for the Tuen Mun – Chek Lap Kok Link. This tunnel from the airport to New Territories is required because of this project. one source, second source - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 16:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related project 

message: What mode of traffic is the structure intended to carry? 182.93.34.10 (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Road only. Citobun (talk) 10:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road, rail or both 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macau Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040301104303/http://www.etwb.gov.hk/about_us/welcome_message/index.aspx?nodeID=28&langno=1 to http://www.etwb.gov.hk/about_us/welcome_message/index.aspx?langno=1&nodeid=28
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Both spellings of Macau are used randomly in the article. Hongkongers and Macanese generally use Macau. Beijingers prefer Macao for some reason.  So I guess I know which will win out. Anyway, it's inconsistent now. 202.81.249.34 (talk) 22:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The move was undiscussed and I've reverted it. Wikipedia usually uses the "Macau" spelling anyway. If people want to move it back, IMO its better to be done through an official page move request Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 07:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

text: Macao sems to look better in Portuguese, but would have to have a tilde over the "a" als in mão for hand, or pão for bread, ocupação for occupation, colonização for colonization, and região for Region in the terrory's official name "Região Administrativa Especial de Macau da República Popular da China" (RAEM). But the Macau authorities themselves are not consistent. So the tourism industry advertises all kinds of "Macao" activities: See hhttps://www.macaotourism.gov.mo/en/ Nonetheless, settling here for Macau is OK.  --L.Willms (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macau/Macao 

message: The HKLR isn't counted as part of the HKMZB from a project point of view and it is not included in official sources as part of the HKMZB for the purpose of measuring the length of the HKMZB. 42.98.83.190 19:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hong Kong's Transport and Housing Bureau has mentioned as such on thier page: "The 55-km Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB), comprising the 12km Hong Kong Link Road, 29.6km Main Bridge and 13.4km Zhuhai Link Road..." https://www.hzmb.gov.hk/en/ Jojoyee (talk) 14:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  HKLR 

message: Has there been no discussion of the environmental effects? Article I have read refer to it, but I'm surprised to see it lacking from the 'effects' section of this article.
Orathaic (talk) 12:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I am not an experts, but why would there be any effect? The approaches on the land were developed years ago, and the bridge itself is just a bridge. It's not blocking the waterway even for the largest of animals nor influences the currents, so I am not sure there should be any. I mean, it's not a mound like the Putin's bridge in the occupied Crimea  Openlydialectic (talk) 20:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:   This, this and this might all be relevant. Jc86035 (talk) 12:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:   There is no reason to ignore it. All information should be on Wikipedia if it is important enough. There is a reason this is a 'free encyclopedia'. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 23:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: STSC added it on 28 October 2018 and I think it's a good point. Jojoyee (talk) 14:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental impact 

message: The first map in the infobox shows an area of empty sea. If you click on it and zoom out far enough, you find that in the Gulf of Guinea. I would correct it, but I've no idea what it's meant to show. Maproom (talk) 08:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first map 

message: Why mention it at all? 61.15.85.96 (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underground tunnel is mentioned but not explained.