lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Air France Flight 1611

message: Should this article be placed in Category:Airliner shootdown incidents? I don't know the aviation world well enough to know if the current allegations (included in the article) have enough strength.GeoGreg (talk) 22:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There isnt any evidence whatsoever it was a shoot down with the exception of a claim, made 42 years after the fact, by a army typist/stenographer that he saw a report in passing which he alleged was a classified report indicating a shoot down.108.18.75.161 (talk) 00:45, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Air France flight 1611 is a flight from Hamburg to Paris ! Though it was also the flight number used by this Caravelle, the crash has never been known by this name for 35 years since Wikipedia did not yet exist. Accident naming conventions suggest using the popular name the event has acquired instead, i.e. 1968 Ajaccio-Nice Caravelle crash--Df (talk) 14:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Rui-be

message: Bearian (talk) 15:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sellisternium

message: I don't see this as a stub, exactly.  There isn't a tremendous amount to say about the subject that seems necessary.  More would be nice, but I think at this point that would be more delineation of precise places and rituals, and that might be beyond the scope.  Utgard Loki (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unstub
Talk:Diodorus of Tarsus

message: This statement confuses me: "The Christology of Diodore was condemned as heretical by later generations, most explicitely at a local synod in Constantinople in 399 which described Diodore's views as Nestorian." What I don't understand is that Nestorius wasn't even in a position to express his views until 428, when he became Patriarch of Constantinople! I'm not sure what happened here: was the source misquoted, or was that source mistaken -- or was the synod somehow predict what would happen a generation later? -- llywrch 02:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I hadn't caught that.  A one-number typo on my part put the synod into the wrong century.  Fixed now (council was 499, not 399), the source was right, my eyes were wrong. Pastordavid 16:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diodore & Nestorianism 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Peer Review

message: I wonder what the percentage is on "people who die from the bite," vs. "people who don't die from the bite." Holy vs. unholy. Wikipedia states that 60 people have died from religious snakebite....but wikipedia does not document the number of people who have survived from a bite. It interesting nevertheless. But, what really provokes these people to drink poison too? Now, that's a bit ridiculous. 
150.198.150.244 (talk) 17:44, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Cleanup

message: Hi.Can you tell me that Aleister Crowley article why belong to the WikiProject Christianity? Aleister Crowley was the most considerable Satanist of the 20. century.Nmate (talk • contribs)  —Preceding comment was added at 11:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aleister Crowley

message: Just a curiosity. Why are there so many "Creation Myths" attached to the "Christianity Project" wikipage? I could understand the "Literal" versus "Gap Therory" etc, but what do all the other Creation stories have to do with Christianity.
If one wants so demonstrate some universiality, as in the flood stories that move through cross culturally, then that might well be a sub-link on the Christian Creation page.
--Bibleguyjeff (talk) 23:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Listing of "Creation Myths"
Talk:History of the Conservative Party (UK)

message: I have put in some references for one of the sections I'm working on for university. SGGH speak! 16:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: references

message: What "Union" does this party support? Is it the union of Great Britain and Ireland? Vernon White . . . Talk  23:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and also that of England and Scotland.Haldraper (talk) 09:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Unionist?

message: Having read this article, it seems to differ considerably on a number of issues from some very clear memories I have and what readily available existing sources say.
I'm sure we all want to get it right so I will update the article.  I also hope to remedy some existing omissions.  Feel free to discuss. Regards JRPG (talk) 09:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding additional [[WP:RS]] citations and maintaining [[WP:NPOV]] 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Maintenance

message: I updated the entire project to make it look more current.  The portal should be next -- SECisek (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New department

message: How do we join the maintenance department.  Trees Rock Plant A Tree! 15:41, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Join
Template talk:Blackwater Worldwide

message: Why does this template specify Name=BlackwaterUSA?
This results in going to the wrong place if you click on E for edit.
I'd fix it, except I don't know very much about how templates work, so I'm afraid I might break something. --RenniePet (talk) 16:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for catching that, I got it. I must have missed it somehow when I began to rename the articles after their company renamed. • Lawrence Cohen 16:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Name=?
Talk:Hotel des Arts

message: if you use this fragmented sentence:  "Materials used include wall-mounted vinyl records, plastic bags, graffiti, fabrics, three dimensional art work, and even installations."
you must give a reference to it. It is violating the copyright material without giving credit to the author or source.
Greatartists210 (talk) 16:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: copyrighted material

message: DO NOT USE THIS SENTENCE WITHOUT THE AUTHOR'S WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND SIGNATURE PROOF.
"Materials used include wall-mounted vinyl records, plastic bags, graffiti, fabrics, three dimensional art work, and even installations."
THANKS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greatartists210 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Contributions to Wikipedia are copyrighted. But content added here is automatically released under the GFDL. It doesn't require additional permission for reuse. — Carl (CBM · talk) 17:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: do not add
Talk:Casbah Coffee Club

message: I have started this article as it needed starting. --andreasegde (talk) 17:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very nice work. I've given it a tweak too. --kingboyk (talk) 02:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Club

message: The club is in West Derby, Liverpool, and not Maghull.--andreasegde (talk) 10:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:Ogle family

message: I reverted the addition of the http://homepage.mac.com/philipdavis/English%20sites/... references as they're pretty far from being WP:RS.  While these pages may be informative, someone's own page can hardly considered reliable.  Can we find other, more reliable sources? Toddst1 (talk) 11:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw that there appeared to be a wealth of information on the site, but it seems to be the work of a single individual (phillip davis) and posted on a mac.com web site.  How do you establish that it would pass Wikipedia:Rs#Self-published_sources?  I'd have been less concerned if we even had an article called Gatehouse Gazetteer. Toddst1 (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://homepage.mac.com references 

message: I must take issue with the statement "Nicholas Ogle,(1605-1546) brother of Henry, was the founder of the American branch of the family through his son Luke and the Ogles of Rothbury by his second son Thomas". 
My first problem is with clarity. The sentence reads like Nicholas was the founder of the American branch through his two sons, but I believe it meant to indicate that Nicholas founded the American branch through his son Luke and also founded the Ogles of Rothbury through his son Thomas. If so, this was not at all clear to me. 
Secondly, I don't believe that Luke ever came to America. The Ogle/Ogles Family Association states that "Nearly all of the 100,000+ Ogles in North America are descendants of either John Ogle, immigrant to Delaware (1664), or Samuel Ogle, three times Governor of Maryland (1731-32; 1733-42; and 1747-52)".
Thirdly, although I have no citations on point, there are far more descendents of John Ogle of Delaware in the U.S. than there are descendents of Samuel Ogle, so if one person is to be singled out as the founder of the American branch, it should be John Ogle. A former president of the Ogle/Ogles Family Association told me that he estimated that 90% of all Ogles in the U.S. today are descended from John Ogle. There are many more genealogical tables in "The Ogle Genealogist" showing John Ogle lines than there are Samuel Ogle lines.
If there are citations to the contrary, I would like to see them. Cwelgo (talk) 19:42, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder of the American branch
Talk:Ericsson T66

message: I am rejecting the no-notability claim. The cell phone is and has been for a long time the smallest and lightest one. This alone is a reason why we should have a page on that. I am also sure that there are plenty of sources even though the phone is not in production anymore. --Yury Petrachenko (talk) 17:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Stalingrad (Beevor book)

message: The external link does not work (at least for me). ATBS 11:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Try it now.  Geoff B (talk) 19:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Works ok for me now. ATBS 08:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link 

message: Despite evident attempts by earlier editors to remove POV material from this article, it reads at present like a rehash of Barbarossa up to Stalingrad written by a fan of Beevor's book rather than an encyclopaedic article about the book itself. What it needs is an editor or several editors familiar not only with this book but also other books on that subject, who can then objectively outline what is unique about Beevor's book, and its critical reception both by press and by historians. Meanwhile other editors will be within their rights to cut all non-encyclopaedic material from this article. Alfietucker (talk) 20:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article needs to be reworked to make it more objective 
Talk:Elvis has left the building

message: An anon deleted the origin story we currently have, and replaced it with a different story, and an external link pointing to a forum comment (as the story's source presumably). I've reverted, and am noting here. The straightdope link supports the current origin story, but doesn't itself cite a source. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdFXur5OocI  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.223.23.208 (talk) 10:50, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  differing source
Talk:The Steve Allen Show

message: Presley in fact was never shown on camera with a top hat on his head. He did however, walk on stage with it in his hand. Steve Pastor (talk) 22:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kinescope of Preley's appearance contradicts a certain author 

message: I lived in Baltimore County at the time this show aired. Westinghouse owned WJZ TV, and broadcast the show during the afternoon. It was not a late-night show. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 23:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Westinghouse show

message: The Steve Allen page's section on this show should be shortened to a summary with a link to this page. The section on the Tonight Show is handled that way there. There is also information on the Steve Allen page not found on this page. Rmrwiki (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose consolidation with the [[Steve Allen]] page. 

message: Neither this page nor the  Steve Allen page cover anything about Allen giving Alwin Nikolais the opportunity to explore the use of dance on television. Nikolais introduced highly innovative costumes and overlapping images that pushed the boundaries of what television could do. Rmrwiki (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Add information about the Nikolais Dance Company's appearances. 

message: Allen introduced many things that were either new to television or which he brought to a wide audience for the first time. Why this pioneering show should be considered of "Low importance" is a mystery. Rmrwiki (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the importance

message: howcum no1 mentions the earlier experimtl show he did on WPIX11 fer 2hrs ? 73.150.158.60 (talk) 09:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allens show on WPIX11
Talk:List of Oregon Wildernesses

message: The Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 designated new wilderness areas in Oregon, as well as other states.  From the Omnibus article:
*   in the Oregon Badlands.
*   in Oregon's Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument. (see Soda Mountain Wilderness)
*   in the Siskiyou National Forest. (see Copper Salmon Wilderness)
I believe the Omnibus Act also added to wilderness in/around the Mount Hood Wilderness and John Day Fossil Beds National Monument.  I've added the Soda Mountain Wilderness and Copper Salmon Wilderness to the list of Oregon Wilderness, but I don't have a sufficient knowledge of the geography to start and/or edit the other articles.  --BlueCanoe (talk) 17:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New wilderness areas in 2009
Talk:Hurricane Karen (2007)

message: Can be seen here. Miranda 01:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Evaluation

message: : Issue addressed miranda 00:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: General Notes

message: Issue addressed miranda 22:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a Reuters cite. miranda 21:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Due to the evaluation above, I decided to put this GA nom on hold. You have seven days (Dec. 31) to improve this article. After the elapsed time period, I will re-assess to see if any improvement has been made to the article. miranda 01:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Decision

message: Seven out of eight (with one neutral) issues have been addressed and corrected. Thus, this article is promoted to GA status.  Congrats!  miranda 01:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-Analysis Decision (7/0/1)

message: It's a short-lived fish hurricane... ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  04:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: , merged. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 13:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You have to delist it as a GA first. Reverted for now. – Juliancolton | Talk 15:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a GT so I don't see any point in a merger, but this definitely wouldn't have an article if the storm occurred today. YE Pacific Hurricane 19:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: This is a short-lived storm with no imapcts on land,  pinging the main editors of the article. --219.79.180.165 (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: See above, the page is a GA so not really a point in a merger... --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 10:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge (2nd)
Talk:FACTNet/Archive 1

message: 1. "Recognizing this and desiring a more universally applicable appearance..." - now how would any uninvolved Wikipedia editor know what FACTnet was thinking, recognizing and desiring, hmmmmmm? 2. "It was later revealed that the lawyers failed to inform the judge that FACTNet was a non-profit electronic library and archive" is unsourced, and even if it was, the next statement of "Possibly due to this omission, the judge was convinced..." is a synthesis, a speculation, original research. 3. Is it really relevant to note that they "spoke out" on foregone-conclusion matters like the Battlefield Earth movie and the South Park episode? Does this mean their every dinky little press release is worth mentioning from here to eternity? wikipediatrix 18:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  problems 

message: *Citations should be standardized with WP:CIT.  I will get on this for existing cites, but please use WP:CIT for future sources.  Thanks.  Cirt 01:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:CIT|Standardizing citations]] 

message: #
#
#
#
#
----
*I'll incorporate these sources into the article when I get a chance.  Cirt 13:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional secondary sources not yet used in the article 

message: See review at subpage, /GA1. Cirt (talk) 20:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 
Talk:List of DC Comics reprint collections

message: DC (main), Wildstorm and Vertigo are large - and very incomplete.  I'm thinking that these 3 get their own page (DC main staying here) and the other imprints being merged with the DC Imprints page. Duggy 1138 (talk) 05:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes...
Talk:Microbial cyst

message: No, I did not know, yet I have often wondered. We non-microbiologists often get the vague impression that there are always limitations to every method of killing microbes (heat, cold, lipid breakdown via soap, dessication, antiseptics, antibiotics, and on and on), but are usually left clueless as to the details. This helps us understand some of the "why". Thanks so much for the article! — ¾-10 19:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re "Did you know" 

message: This page appears because the general word "cyst" is taken entirely by medical uses.
"Microbial cyst" is not really broad enough to cover all the types of cyst found in general biology. Certainly it is misleading to use it for the survival cysts found in some nematodes and many rotifers (no doubt there are also cysts in some other groups). "Cyst (biology)" would be more encompassing. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: — Assignment last updated by Microbioncsu12 (talk) 20:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Microbial Symbiosis and Microbiomes
Talk:Harmonium (disambiguation)

message: I sincerely doubt that anyone will have an answer for this one, but I recently purchased an accordion and it has an outline of where a company logo used to be on it and it clearly says 'Harmonium' in the glue, I suppose. I'm wondering if anyone has heard of Harmonium as an accordion-making company. --Thaddius (talk) 18:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company?
Talk:Arduinna

message: Arduina and Arduinna are clearly on the same subject but, as I don’t know which name is commoner, I am neutral as to where the merged article should be. —Ian Spackman (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can find records of only two inscriptions, one spelled Arduinna at Rome, the other Ardbinna from somewhere called Gey in Germany. No single-n spellings. Q·L·1968 ☿ 20:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I merged them, it seems double "n" is the most common. Goldenrowley (talk) 08:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: The 'variant spellings' Arduina, Arduinnae, Arduinne do not deserve special mention. There are, as far as I'm away, no instances in which Arduinna is spelled with only one n. The other two are merely in the dative case – but English prefers the nominative for its citation forms. (Ardbinna could legitimately be considered a variant spelling.) Q·L·1968 ☿ 22:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Variant spellings

message: There's every reason to think that Arduina is the same goddess as the Iranian - Zoroastrian and, relevantly, Mithraic - Ardvi Sura Anahita, the 'strong moist spotless' one, a personification of the receptiveness and enduring power symbolized by water. There is some continuity between quasi-Zoroastrian Iranian peoples 'natively on the ground' like the Alans in the Ciscaucasian steppe (SE Russia) and the early Kurds of Cappadocia, with the Celts of the Balkans and Galatia (W-C Turkey); but more likely the connection between Iran and the Ardennes is via Roman soldiers who everywhere espoused the esoteric Iranian religion of Mithras, about which we still know far too little.UnknownSage (talk) 00:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ardvi Sura Anahita
Talk:Fratzog

message: Ok, it is tough to come up with information on Fratzog that isn't just a copy of the WP page.  I have found two, but probably something more solid would improve things. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is nothing more to say I suggest that this article is merged into the main Dodge article especially as it has an "expansion" request on the logos part.  Malcolma (talk) 12:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Borodino-class battleship

message: This article says there were no survivors, the ship's page says there were four. ??? Rcbutcher (talk) 03:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Russian battleship Imperator Aleksander III (1901)]] survivors ?

message: How can the voyage of the Russian Second Pacific Squadron be claimed as the longest such voyage in history when only a couple years later the Great White Fleet would travel over 43,000 miles in the process of circumnavigating the globe? Jrt989 (talk) 02:41, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *That sentence "...Longest battleship voyage in history...to engage the enemy in decisive battle" is on Admiral Rozhestvensky's website (his biography).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.176.154 (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest voyage by a battleship fleet? 

message: I have altered the above phrase in the text below, because by definition, a "triple-expansion" engine has three cylinders, one for each stage of expansion. It is a form of "multiple-expansion steam engine". A four cylinder engine of this type is known as a "quadruple-expansion" steam engine. I will assume that the original person who wrote that was correct that there was four cylinders, thus I have altered it to read "quadruple-expansion". If it really is a "triple-expansion" engine, it ought to read "three-cylinder" instead. .45Colt 05:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You are wrong. Four-cylinder, triple-expansion engines have two low-pressure cylinders of equal pressure. Three different pressures used, hence triple-expansion. A quadruple-expansion engine would use four different pressures, by definition.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Four cylinder triple-expansion steam engine" 