lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:LTP induction

message: I'd rather not merge it.  In reading up on Wikipedia style it seems that it is preferable to keep articles relatively short.  The main LTP article is kind of long.  What I was attempting here was to split some of the details off into separate articles as the style suggestions suggest.  This current article, "LTP induction" is going to get a lot longer than it is currently.  I've just begun to write on it.  So I think it will be less and less appropriate to merge it into the main LTP article.  Synaptidude 28 June 2005 17:08 (UTC)
:Agreed; it shouldn't be merged. --David Iberri (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[long-term potentiation]]

message: Because of its importance for signal transduction in LTP, I think a more complete description on the role of calcium in LTP induction should be written here...
SchwarzeSchlange 21:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calcium 

message: The article starts off with "induction of NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP)" and the article deals mainly with NMDA dependant LTP. Could we maybe subhead different induction protocols? There's mention of tetanic stimulation but there are others such as thetaburst stimulation, PPF etc which could be added to different subheadings as they are all different types of LTP induction. And then chemical LTP induction for mGluR mediated LTP etc... I notice this page isn't updated too often so i'll keep an eye out for feedback but maybe add some pieces/sandbox some subheadings over the next few months and see how it goes. TeaStew (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  All types of LTP induction? 

message: Only one reference mentioned.  
Spelling errors in citation in authors name and article title.  
Cited article also does not really cover the material provided in the wikipedia article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.131.125.50 (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference(s)
Talk:Field of fractions

message: I replaced "a zero-divisor free commutative ring with more than one element" with "an integral domain". JamesBWatson reverted the change, saying "No, if you read further down it explicitly states taht there need not be a 1. "Ring" is often taken as implying a 1, but not always."  However, Wikipedia practice does currently define "ring" to have a multiplicative identity via monoid, so using this longer phrase doesn't make the more general applicability any clearer.  
I think the best fix would be to start out discussing integral domains, and then discuss the more general case of a pseudo-ring later in the article, especially since AFAICT the field of fractions of a pseudo-ring which is not a ring doesn't necessarily contain the pseudo-ring, contrary to the assertion that it is "the smallest field in which it can be embedded".  Thoughts? ciphergoth (talk) 13:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In wiki, it is currently the convention that rings have identity. Also, as a matter of clarity, I think the first sentence should have "a zero-divisor free commutative ring with more than one element" replaced by "an integral domain". Then use the second sentence to say basically what it already says and explain that the field of fractions can be defined in a slightly more general context. Because the fact of the matter is most people coming to this article will be looking for the word "integral domain", and everybody else can wait until the second sentence to see the more general context. RobHar (talk) 14:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Very foolish of me to miss the natural injection - thanks!  Made that intro slightly shorter by linking to the existing article on pseudo-rings (aka rngs). ciphergoth (talk) 14:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integral domain? 

message: The element 0 of a ring R is a zero divisor if and only if R is not the zero ring.  See Zero_divisor#Zero_as_a_zero_divisor for references and for an explanation of how the best definition leads to this. Ebony Jackson (talk) 07:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zero is sometimes a zero divisor 

message: I've removed the citation needed template from .  Citations don't go in that section; if you have questions about the Ore condition, please mark them on that page instead.  Thanks, 128.135.98.218 (talk) 03:56, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Citation needed" removed 

message: The universal property doesn't seem right. I see no reason why the domain itself doesn't satisfy the requirements for Quot(R). Perhaps g should be a field monomorphism? --MarSch 28 June 2005 17:12 (UTC)
:"Field monomorphism" is unnecessary; a ring homomorphism with domain a field is either the zero map or is one-to-one (and hence a monomorphism). Since h is injective, and g extends h, g cannot be the zero map. As for the "universal property", it's a field with the corresponding universal property (that is, the field, together with embedding of R into it, that has this property relative to embeddings of R into fields). That's why R itself doesn't satisfy it, unless it is already a field. 06:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Universal Condition
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 4

message: Without any sort of discussion the infobox was recently changed. Personally I liked the previous version, but what does everyone else think? I was contemplating reverting this, but thought getting some discussion on this would be best. K1Bond007 05:06, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
:Revert. I also prefer the previous version and I think the copy/paste code in the infobox's discussion should also be considered for reversion, since its current state leaves room for the mistake of putting the info. on the wrong side of the pipe. – Quoth 14:58, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Rv, the previous version was just fine, although by some reason it left the rating field even if empty. wS 01:33, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

text: Revert. It looked better before with the colors in one column. --Poiuyt Man talk 18:18, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've somewhat-reverted it. The Table of Content colors are still there, but it is now colored differently in the left column. --Poiuyt Man talk 23:01, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent infobox changes

message: I'm a gamer, and wikipedia user, and would want to know if i could join this project. So far, i've only made one game-related article, but i've greatly contributed to some others. Also want to know where i could get more specific info on this project - like when the weekly meetings are for editing an article. Thanks, Elitejeff123 22:23, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no requirements. Just goto the project page and add your name. There aren't any meetings either. This is just a project to give editors that occasionally edit on game articles direction and focus (for lack of a better description - see the mission statement). Also look into participating with Wikipedia:Gaming Collaboration of the week. K1Bond007 22:29, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, K1Bond007 Elitejeff123 23:39, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Joining CVG Project
Talk:Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez

message: The page showed a wrong 2,285 meters altitude above mean sea level.  The correct value is 2,238m because the terrain is almost flat between Mexico City International Airport Benito Juárez, which altitude varies between 2, 235 and 2,240 m asl.  HTe wrong values came form the Official autodrome webpage, that still has TWO values, the wrong 2.285m and the correct one of 2,238 m asl. Amclaussen, Nov. 11, 2019.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.18 (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper Altitude of the track was corrected to show 2,238 m (7,342 ft.) instead of wrong "2,285 m"

message: Should this article mention that the track layout is about to be ruined by Hermann Tilke ready for the 2015 F1 season?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.197.147 (talk) 12:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NPOV. If you don't like his work it is not within the scope of this article. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 06:45, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the details since they've emerged and developement has begun. Twirlypen (talk) 03:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout
Talk:Chicagoland Speedway

message: Much of the text appears to have been taken directly from the speedway's web site at . I don't know if this is a copyright violation per se, but it could certainly use a rewrite. --Metropolitan90 06:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 

message: I don't think the track is "one continuous curve" as the sections between turns 4 and 1, respectively, and the trioval are straight.Zenmiester 13:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shape 

message: Not certain where it is worth mentioning, but this most recent season of The Amazing Race uses this as a challenge in its finale (which is in Chicago) SecretName101 (talk) 19:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Amazing Race 
Talk:Puggle (disambiguation)

message: It has been my experience as a Puggle owner that they are a very mild mannered and loyal breed - great with children. Their coat is short and soft and easy to care for. Their snouts are not as short as the Pug which makes them less susceptible to breathing and eye troubles. --63.144.103.106 16:47, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Searching for "Puggle" should direct to this disambig page, not to Puggle (dog). Puggle was the term for a baby echidna or platypus long before someone thought to cross breed a pug with a beagle.
114.198.91.40 (talk) 07:10, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I am personally in agreement that a search for the term "puggle" should land on either this disambiguation page or the the article page for monotreme, it is somewhat difficult to mount an effective argument for this. In addition, I am strongly of the view the page for the dog breed should be be titled "Puggle (dog breed)" or similar to minimise any ambiguity. Certainly the term as applied to montremes has primacy over the same word as used for the dog breed, however, it is not difficult to imagine searches for the dog breed significantly outnumbering searches for the juveniles of monotremes. Can anyone add anything useful (i.e reasonable and rational, rather than appeals to emotion) regarding this discussion? Peter B. (talk) 06:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Searching for Puggle should not automatically direct to Puggle (dog)
Talk:Gateway Motorsports Park

message: Since the Gateway International Raceway is in Illinois it is neither in St. Louis nor Missouri.  Therefore I am removing it from the Buildings and structures in St. Louis Category  (Steve 21:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buildings and structures in St. Louis Category 

message: "The current oval and infield road course were built in 1969..." "In 1995 Chris Pook, ..., demolished the old tracks,..." Since the old tracks were demolished in 1995, the current ones can't be the ones built in 1969. Bizzybody (talk) 20:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The history of St. Louis International Raceway really should be added to this article, as it was on the same location and, in its final year of operation, was apparently known as Gateway International Raceway itself. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History conflict 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Gateway Motorsports Park.  No such user (talk) 14:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: World Wide Technology Raceway →  – "Gateway" is overwhelmingly the WP:COMMONNAME used in sources, such as Road & Track, Autosport, Autoweek, the Indianapolis Star, Speedcafe, Racer, Speed Sport, Race Fans, and by Indycar themselves. The WP:OFFICIAL name seems to be rarely used in sources, if at all, and thus lacks the  necessary for an article title. While "Gateway" is too vague by itself for a title, natural disambiguation can easily be derived from the addition of the word "Raceway"; "Circuit" or "Speedway" would also be appropriate disambiguators. The proposed title is also more WP:CONCISE than the current title while being equally WP:PRECISE. The current title can remain in the lead and infobox and as a redirect. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 03:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 April 2021
Talk:Dover Motor Speedway

message: I put clean-up because maybe some of those sections can be broken up. 68.106.193.194 (talk) 22:41, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 
Talk:Kansas Speedway

message: This appears: 
"The demand at the ticket sales prompted ISC officials to expand the planned 32 by an additional 36, expanding capacity from 75,000 to 82,000" 
- but it is not clear what this is referring to. Grandstands? Rows? Seats?...? 
--Tapalmer99 (talk) 18:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: refers to what?

message: Future Infrastructure Template?
How is a casino and a closed loop racetrack an infrastructure project?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.233.169.128 (talk) 08:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kentucky Speedway

message: Is there anyway that we could get the track records for Kentucky up here? I mean I probably could do it if I knew what the records were. So I guess im asking for someone to put the records up if they know them.207.136.213.243 (talk) 20:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  records 

message: I was thinking about adding a map of the speedway. It is a image and I found the image from Explore UK by Karl Raitz. This would be useful to the Stub because it adds information on how the track looks and the layout of Kentucky speedway.Kishan.patel1 (talk) 14:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit-Adding a Kentucky Speedway Map Track
Talk:Las Vegas Motor Speedway

message: What is the need for the paragraph about the firearms policy at the track, and how did it earn its own heading? I thought one of the rules of Wikipedia is that it's not a how-to manual, or something to that effect. Besides that, the track's own website doesn't make the distinction between people with a concealed-carry permit - it only claims that "weapons of any description" are not welcome. I'm going to guess this is some individual race fan's pet issue...? --Duncan1800 23:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firearm restrictions?
Talk:Rick Griffin

message: I had a book of Rick Griffin's collected work at one point. The book mentioned his conversion to Christianity. Does anyone have any further information on that. If I still had the book I would have more details about this, sorry.Javafreek 22:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know anything about the circumstances of his conversion, but after aboiut 1971, he was clearly an evangelical Christian, and Jesus featured pominently in his work--even some of the Zap Comix stuff.  He did an illustrated "Gospel of John" in 1980--I think it may still be distributed by some evangelical churches.  BTfromLA 02:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  His conversion to Christianity
Talk:Mansfield Motor Speedway

message: Per NASCAR, the official site of Mansfield Motorsports Speedway is http://www.mansfield-speedway.com, not http://www.mansfieldspeedway.com. If anyone wants to dispute this, please mention it here, not just revert without explaining in the summary, else it will be considered vandalism. -slowpokeiv 19:51, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Web Site 

message: Per this site, Mansfield Motorsports Park has reopened as Spitzer Motor Speedway. Shall this be added? 69.122.55.201 (talk) 16:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reopening 
Talk:Martinsville Speedway

message: I noticed that there is no track records section, if someone would be nice enough to put them up be nice to see that.207.136.213.243 (talk) 20:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  records 

message: Based off this video: link the track was already planned to be repaved after the 2005 race, so it's inaccurate to say that the repave happened in reaction to the concrete flying into Jeff Gordon's car.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.58.174 (talk) 06:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 Jeff Gordon Incident / Repave 

message: Why was my edit about the track's location reverted?  For a source, just look at a map like this one.  It clearly shows that, in spite of the mailing address, the track is just south of the city limits of Martinsville, but is several miles north of the Ridgeway town limits.  I thought that should be noted, while still showing its Ridgeway mailing address.Inkan1969 (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedway Location
Talk:Michigan International Speedway

message: I have put the records into a table. Not sure if a list of "notable accidents" is really needed (plus many are un-cited and do not contribute to information about the track), perhaps a list of fatalities and if there is enough information a section on track safety. A Section on "Racing History" would be great to add.
Lvi56 (talk) 23:22, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Cleanup
Talk:Nazareth Speedway

message: I have updated this page to the best of my abilities without doing some major online digging or driving back north to my parents' house to get some sources at the local libraries. I believe the only citations that are necessary at this point are for the large track section, which has a lot of unverified race standings.
Mr6507 (talk) 01:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  As good as I can make it... it's up to '''you''' now!
Talk:New Hampshire Motor Speedway

message: The name has been changed to New Hampshire International Speedway, not New Hampshire Motor Speedway. See  and . Not sure how to go about changing the whole thing, because New Hampshire International Speedway redirects to this page. TimBilly1224 (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: the paragraph: 
"
In 2018, the fall race weekend, consisting of the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series and Camping World Truck Series is being moved to the Las Vegas Motor Speedway. It was replace with what they called Full Throttle Weekend.[6] With NASCAR Local in International series stopping by NASCAR Whelen Modified Tour with the Musket 250, NASCAR K&N Pro Series East with the Apple Barrel 125 and NASCAR Pinty's Series Visit New Hampshire 100.[7]" 
..  is not clear or complete as to the date change or replacement and the link associated with it no longer exists (to be able to research for clarification) Tapalmer99 (talk) 12:35, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite paragraph
Talk:Pikes Peak International Raceway

message: This page need be brought more into line with organized motor sport, updated to denote historic qualifying and race lap records, for each of the sanctioning body having competed at the facility. One notable example from which to model such an inclusion would be, the Nurburgring's Nordschleife page - asj.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.87.162 (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Lap Records
Talk:Richmond Raceway

message: I noticed a number of references using the url to a Google Book link. I though editors might be interested in a tool which takes a link as input and creates a (usually) properly formatted ref.
Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books
I used it to improve two such references.
It really helps creates a much cleaner list of references. I hope you will try it. S Philbrick(Talk) 20:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Talladega Superspeedway

message: Is it possible to get the track records for Talladega on here?207.136.213.243 (talk) 20:13, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  track records 

message: What size and what kind of handbags can be brought in on race day? 158.120.164.83 (talk) 23:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bags that can be brought in on race day.
Talk:2005 NASCAR Nextel Cup Series

message: There's a mess on the front page. I don't know how to fix it. 74.103.74.93 (talk) 23:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh Guys... 

message: I don't know the link for the actual 2005 point standings, but I'm sure there is something wrong starting from Kyle Petty downwards - any idea of the actual points from Petty and beyond. 173.179.155.183 (talk) 01:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Points Standings issue
Talk:3: The Dale Earnhardt Story

message: Just watched the movie again and fixed a few things that were worded strangely or were wrong. Also, I took out the part about Dale Jr. listening to a yet-unreleased 3 Doors Down song after the 1998 Daytona 500. There was nothing in the movie saying that it was on any certain date, so it could have been after the song was released. Matito29 17:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed a few things 

message: Actually, Daytona does have a dogleg, although it is usually called "the tri-oval." Lowe's has a double dogleg, so I am removing the note about Daytona not having a dogleg, since it is on the frontstretch where the start-finish line is located and is clearly visible.--Chaz 22:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daytona dogleg
Talk:Busch Light Clash at The Coliseum

message: *2006 race was not the first delayed. There was one year where the race (perhaps 1982? 1984?) that was run on Monday due to rain. Doctorindy 17:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

message: *I am currently filling out the race history in table form, should be on-line soon.
*Revamping race history and race trivia, the current listing is quite heavy, and hard to follow. Organizing it to make it easier to read and follow.
Doctorindy 17:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page cleanup

message: Should we change the name of this page to "Daytona Shootout"? Nascar.com is referring this race as the Daytona Shootout and not the Budweiser Shootout, as seen here, http://www.nascar.com/races/cup/ (MDesjardinss (talk) 16:06, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: All of the links in the External Links section are broken. (74.78.52.83 (talk) 06:48, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Links 

message: What is this looks like there racing on a go kart track 2600:1700:3E20:74D0:B5E4:3D13:59F3:931D (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nascar