lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gamma Pegasi

message: Where did the etymology go? Algenib originates from al-janb, which existed in an earlier version of this article. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 18:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It didn't. The al-janb stuff is explained in Alpha Persei. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 18:57, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Old

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old does not refer to this page. Neıl ☎ 11:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: What about old as in , for example old doll?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.175.86 (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  old 

message: Used when speaking about something that has existed or has been around for a long time e.g. "wow that computer is from 1980 it is old"
Either that or someone misspelled or autocorrected oil  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:7C02:E00:B9AF:6ED3:2FDB:610A (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old
Talk:Lhamo La-tso

message: *Ektamatri "This very popular mother goddess belongs to the group of Lhamos, the goddesses who guard the Cosmos."
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.207.205 (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Lhamos]]
Talk:Donald Keith (author)

message: According to 2003 Usenet discussion archived by Google at 
<> and <>, there were a number of "Time Machine" stories published under the byline "Donald Keith" and also "Keith Monroe" in Boy's Life magazine.
An incomplete list:
*DK  "Mutiny in the Time Machine"  Dec 1962 to Mar 1963 (4-part serial)
*DK  "The Time Machine Hunts a Treasure"  Apr 1967 to  Jun 1967 (3-part serial)
*DK  "The Dog from the Time Machine"     Dec 1968  
*DK  "The Time Machine and the Generation Gap"   Sep 1970   
*DK  "The King and the Time Machine"        Aug 1971
*DK  "The Time Machine Cleans Up"           Feb 1973
*KM  "The Time Machine Twins the Jamboree"  Aug 1973
*DK  "Santa Claus and the Time Machine"     Dec 1973
*KM  "The Time Machine Fights Earthquakes"  Nov 1974
*KM  "The Time Machine Saves a Patriot"     Apr 1975 
I'm not skilled at crafting Wikipedia articles but maybe someone else could format these neatly, dig up page numbers, etc.
Another story by Donald Keith, "Butterfly 9," was published in the January 1957 issue of Galaxy.
In 1952 Keith Monroe published a humorous book called Be Prepared about his experiences as a Boy Scout leader, under the pseudonym Rice E. Cochran. A review appeared in Time: <>.
Beamjockey (talk) 00:32, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Neat! Here's a direct link to "The Time Machine Flies Backwards":  Thanks for the research! I'll have to look into incorporating some of this info into the article later. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:29, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete list of Donald Keith's Time Machine stories 
Talk:Kora (pilgrimage)

message: can we not have a ref to  <<<Snelling, John. (1990). The Sacred Mountain: The Complete Guide to Tibet's Mount Kailas. 1st edition 1983. Revised and enlarged edition, including: Kailas-Manasarovar Travellers' Guide. Forwards by H.H. the Dalai Lama of Tibet and Christmas Humphreys. East-West Publications, London and The Hague. ISBN 0-85692>>> on this page? I tried twice see article history but it was removedStone Routes (talk) 08:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Harvey's Brewery

message: Did someone name this article using a keyboard on which the apostrophe key was missing or damaged? Get it fixed, please. --The Huhsz (talk) 09:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, well done. --The Huhsz (talk) 11:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the article name wrong?
Talk:Hook Norton Brewery

message: I'm sorry that the beerbox looks a bit bare. I've listed all of Hook Norton's current brews in it but I haven't dare to categorise them. Please forgive me if I take the easy way out and leave that part of the task to conoisseurs who know more about different classes of ale than I do! Motacilla (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Beerbox
Talk:Hoskins Brothers Ales

message: I'm a family member so I won't edit the article directly.   However this article is kind of hard to understand.
The original hoskins family brewery was T Hoskins Ltd.
After George hoskins died the family opted to sell the brewery.   At that time Philip (head brewer at hoskins) and his brother Stephen founded Hoskins & Oldfield Brewery and later Hoskins Brothers Ales.   Hoskins Brothers Ales has a single pub : The Ale Wagon, 27 Rutland St Leicester.
Helpful links :
http://books.google.com/books?id=NB8NAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA187&lpg=PA187&dq=%22t+hoskins+ltd%22&source=bl&ots=EjZu3FLK0o&sig=v4YrHexN4LAlBNezrSQa7tj_M9o&hl=en&ei=-oeZS-36FYfMNZ2ZpHo&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CAsQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22t%20hoskins%20ltd%22&f=false
http://www.breweryhistory.com/Defunct/Leics.htm
http://www.beermad.org.uk/brewery/1199
Terrymr (talk) 00:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:WikiProject notability advice

message: This template was proposed at WT:BIO#How to fix the Additional criteria section, and designed by Balloonman. —gorgan_almighty (talk) 12:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: While the wording in this template establishes that a notability essay may be used for AfD discussion purposes, it doesn't address whether or not they should be used as a/the reason for the AfD nomination. Since these are two very different aspects of the AfD process, is this something that might be more explicitly addressed? I'd always assumed that AfD nominations needed to be based on things of global-wide consensus, and that notability essays were only to be used for the actual discussion (hence the current wording) but I suppose I've never actually known one way or the other. Buddy23Lee (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This was resolved some time ago. It's now explicit that these essays do not provide rationales that automatically qualify as valid deletion arguments.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  09:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity for AfD usage?
Portal talk:England/Suggestions

message: ===Basic criteria===
*The article must be within the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject England.
*The article must be B-Class or above.
*Wherever possible, it should have at least one free image.
===Suggestions===
We are currently looking for Aprils selected article
Please list your suggestions below.
* Avon Gorge
* Bristol Harbour
* Buildings and architecture of Bristol
* Cheddar Gorge and Caves
* Chew Magna
* Chew Stoke
* Chew Valley
* Chew Valley Lake
* Exmoor
* Kennet and Avon Canal
* Lundy
* Mendip Hills  
* Somerset
* Somerset Levels
* The Exchange, Bristol  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodw (talk • contribs) 11:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Where/how are the selections made & is there a list somewhere of those already chosen? Also is there a place to suggest DYKs?— Rod talk 13:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thanks for your suggestions, Rod — if you want to suggest for DYK, you can leave it under the section here (which I will add now), again, thanks for your suggestions, they have been most helpful for the portal :) Qst 15:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Basically, if people want to put suggestions forward for discussion, they can do and suggest a month to use it on. If there's no objection, we'll go ahead and use the article. Portal:England/Selected_article/Archives contains all our achives, and it includes future articles selected articles that are going to be used. Ryan Postlethwaite 15:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Selected article

message: We are currently looking for Aprils selected article
Please list your suggestions below.
* Avon Gorge
* Bristol Harbour
* Buildings and architecture of Bristol
* Cheddar Gorge and Caves
* Chew Magna
* Chew Stoke
* Chew Valley
* Chew Valley Lake
* Exmoor
* Kennet and Avon Canal
* Lundy
* Mendip Hills  
* Somerset
* Somerset Levels
* The Exchange, Bristol  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodw (talk • contribs) 11:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Where/how are the selections made & is there a list somewhere of those already chosen? Also is there a place to suggest DYKs?— Rod talk 13:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thanks for your suggestions, Rod — if you want to suggest for DYK, you can leave it under the section here (which I will add now), again, thanks for your suggestions, they have been most helpful for the portal :) Qst 15:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Basically, if people want to put suggestions forward for discussion, they can do and suggest a month to use it on. If there's no objection, we'll go ahead and use the article. Portal:England/Selected_article/Archives contains all our achives, and it includes future articles selected articles that are going to be used. Ryan Postlethwaite 15:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: *I think Rods suggestion of Kennet and Avon Canal would be an excellent idea for April. It has a good ldea, and it's a good informatvie article, especially for the start of spring. Ryan Postlethwaite 15:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of suggestions
Talk:Wing commander

message: Additional references required PunkyNZ (talk) 01:30, 22 Sep 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Magnetic cartridge

message: The name of this article needs to be changed to "phono cartridge". The terms "cartridge" and "magnetic cartridge" do not describe the use of such technology in the playback of phonograph records. Phono cartridge has been the correct term (at least in the U.S.) for over 50-60 years. Also, not all phono cartridges are magnetic. Many early cartridges in the 1940s and 1950s and or low quality cartridges were often described as "ceramic cartridges".2600:100F:B029:8537:B457:EEBC:2D4F:BE64 (talk) 10:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is specifically about the magnetic type. The existence of ceramic (and crystal) piezoelectric cartridges (and their ongoing manufacture and use in cheap gear -- the past tense above is incorrect) is noted in the "history" section, but they are not the subject of any subsequent text. As the overarching topic is the playing of phonograph records, the "phono" part, which is only an arbitrary although long-entrenched abbreviation (and an oddity to Brits), is implicit and need not be used apart from being duly noted once, just as "record" suffices for "phonograph record" if the subject has been established. 66.81.104.244 (talk) 22:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

text: I've been looking around in related articles, and now believe the scope of this article should be trimmed to include only magnetic cartridges. Brief mention of piezoelectric phono pickups (crystal and ceramic) could be made in a history section, with a link to Phonograph#Piezoelectric_(crystal/ceramic)_cartridges, where they are discussed in further depth. Just plain Bill (talk) 11:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

text: Vinyl is not a current technology. There isn't a great deal of ongoing development and expansion to describe. One might even say that ceramic and crystal (non-magnetic) cartridges are obsolete - although I wouldn't make that claim for magnetic. We do need an article on the broader scope of phono cartridges, we do need one on crystal, we don't gain from having the magnetic content separate from this. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Vinyl remains as a legacy medium, and turntables still exist in a niche market. The scope of an encyclopedia need not be limited to ongoing developments; there are plenty of articles dealing with historic topics. That having been said, I would just as easily favor renaming it as Andy suggests. That would entail rewriting this article, along with re-targeting incoming links from magnetic cartridge as needed. Another possibility, avoiding wasted motion as I see it, would be redirection to Phonograph#Pickup systems, which appears to be in decent shape. Just plain Bill (talk) 14:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Title and scope

message: it is not unsefull to talk about an output voltage unless the reference velocity will be clearly defined.
US or European standard , RMS or peak. It is usefull to give values in   ## mV  s/cm ( both RMS ). The ouput voltage (better as level in dBV) is important to discuss noise and overload (distortion).
--AK45500 (talk) 14:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  output voltage
Talk:Alex Curran

message: since when? surely this is a citation needed or evidence needs to be provided. Boils (talk) 12:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model? 
Talk:The Book Group

message: What's with the airing dates? The intro says 2001-02, and the info box says late 2002 to early '03 which couldn't be right. tvrage.com (which I'm more inclined to believe) suggests it aired between April 2002 and February 2003. I don't know what the point of this comment is other than pointing out that we have two sets of dates, both of which are probably wrong... and, well, obviously we need some verified ones. Nova Prime (talk) 12:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airing dates
Talk:Thornbridge Brewery

message: The three Thornbridge beers I have tried (Wild Swan, Kipling, Jaipur), while quite different, all have a distinctive flavour in common. I suspect it is caused by the hops they use. Do these three use the same hops?  What hops? Maproom (talk) 20:52, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to a bottle of Kipling, its contents is brewed using "exclusively ... Nelson Sauvin" hops. If that is what causes the characteristic taste of all three above-mentioned beers, I think it's worth a mention in the article. I wonder if a beer bottle is a "reliable source" for WP's purposes? Maproom (talk) 22:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hops 

message: This wikipage has been regularly updated with an IP address with a reverse DNS lookup of mail.thornbridge.co.uk (amongst other updates from the same geographical location). Several important details about the company have been hidden/not revealed, including most tellingly/importantly; the owners of the company (Emma and Jim Harrison - most famous for A4E and the scandals therein).
The page was already highlighted as being an advertisement before this discovery.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bullblade (talk • contribs) 11:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reduced the promotional content, which is not suitable for an encyclopedia. It would be more interesting to know what hops they use. Maproom (talk) 07:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The promotional content, already too high, continues to rise. A purge is overdue. Maproom (talk) 08:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

text: I have removed more of the promo stuff. Left the unsourced beer list but see no reason it shouldn't be deleted. Ed1964 (talk) 23:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self Promotion/edits
Talk:Weltons Brewery

message: According to CAMRA "What's Brewing", closed March 2021: https://wb.camra.org.uk/2021/05/05/covid-closes-welton-brewery  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.125.45.24 (talk) 10:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brewery Closure 2021
Talk:Hanbury Manor

message: The article as written suggests that Edmund Hanbury was the son/grandson of Robert Hanbury. Anybody know which? Bazj (talk) 16:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted. Bazj (talk) 18:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son or Grandson? 
Talk:Kirkstall

message: The Swedish site for Kirkstall Abbey has a good photograph, is there anyway to transfer it to related English pages. Mtaylor848 (talk) 16:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is on Commons so can be used on any project just like any other image. You can see it here :Image:Kirkstall Abbey.jpg. Keith D (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbey 
Talk:Camouflet

message: I have read an account by Don Shaw https://www.chaddesdenhistorygroup.co.uk/adolfs-bombs of exploring a WWII bomb crater. He claims that a crater would have a camouflet under it, with a domed top forming the bottom of the crater, through which a sufficiently heavy person exploring the bottom of the crater would fall and be asphyxiated by the poisonous fumes.
This doesn't sound quite like the description here, which implies EITHER a camouflet OR a crater. Surely it the camouflet breaks the surface the ejected debris just falls back into the hole and fills the camouflet?
86.187.228.161 (talk) 17:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crater and camouflet
Talk:York Brewery

message: The brewery itself is still in York, although it is now closed and the beer under the name is brewed by Black Sheep. Tricky to say all that in the SD. How about “Brewery in York, England (closed 2018)”? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 08:05, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy with that, as things stand. Where do we go if they do open a new brewery in outer York as they say, though? Ian Dalziel (talk) 11:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We rejoice our good fortune! We will update the article should that happen. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 16:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed
Wikipedia talk:Generally notable people

message: Please note per update on WP:ENT one of the notability qualifications has been depreciated, "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." I belive it may need to be updated in this essay. CosmicNotes (talk) 07:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depeciated criteria? 

message: This essay was created from the "Additional criteria" section on WP:BIO, as discussed at WT:BIO#How to fix the Additional criteria section. —gorgan_almighty (talk) 13:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I encountered an individual who confused WP:GNP with WP:GNG, citing a passage from it, and claiming that passage was from GNG.  Specifically, they cited:
:That a person has a relationship with a well-known person is not a reason for a standalone article; see Relationships do not transfer notability. However, the person may be included in the related article. For example Brooklyn Beckham and Jason Allen Alexander."
Well, there is something missing here.  While having a relationship with someone more famous doesn't confer notability on the less famous individual, it should not preclude covering the less famous individual in a standalone article, if there are enough notability factors for them to measure up to our inclusion criteria, on their own right.
In fact, if the less notable person measures up to our inclusion criteria it is far better for them to have a standalone article than ot be shoehorned into the article on their more famous relative.
The examples I generally offer are Elizabeth Windsor, Queen of England, and her descendants and first, second, and third cousin.  There has been sufficient independent coverage for all of the first two dozen individuals in the UK's official list of successors to all have standalone articles.  About half of the third and fourth dozen individuals on that list -- EW's first cousins, merit standalone article.  And then only ten to fifteen percent of the next hundred or so individuals on the list have standalone articles.
I think that section of this essay needs to be rewritten, so it doesn't mislead newbies into thinking that everyone related to someone more famous is always barred from having a standalone article of their own. 
This seems to be a rarely read essay.  It is possible no one will respond here.  So, I will wait a reasonable period of time, and, if no one weighs in, I will rewrite the questionable passage myself.   Geo Swan (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: This essay is open to misinterpretation
Talk:Flag of the Brussels-Capital Region

message: I strongly disagree, it is normal for flags to have their own page, this has enough data to stand on its own and hence should be kept for expansion. Merging with symbols would add nothing.- J Logan t: 19:58, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no strong feelings, I just noticed that the content of this article combined would make a reasonable sub-section. Brussels has four different symbols, none of which have a great deal of background information. I'm frustrated there's virtually no information on the internet about the coat of arms. But if you want this as a separate article, I won't challenge that. - SSJ ☎ 02:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, this is the best solution. - SSJ ☎ 11:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:New World Encyclopedia

message: fringy as the project may sound, I found that their Aesir article was actually better than ours. Since the project is GFDL, content can just be copied back to WP (with attribution!) dab (𒁳) 13:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I worked on the project and often used my work there to also improve WP articles. (One of my favorites is Dog#Dogs in religion) Steve Dufour (talk) 15:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  At least one better article 

message: I removed the following from the article:
Kaufmann, Frank (editor-in-chief) (2008) New World Encyclopedia: Selected Articles, St. Paul, MN: Paragon House 
My searches on both the book title and the ISBN came up totally empty.  That included a check of the Paragon House website, for 2008 books. If in fact this book really does exist, please provide a URL.  -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 21:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book? 

message: *I have no problem with merging it into Universal Peace Federation -- beyond the fact that it would be adding another unsourced section into an already badly sourced article, that itself fails to establish its notability (only citations are to its own website). HrafnTalkStalk 16:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nupedia has significant 3rd party coverage, and is arguably notable as the predecessor to wikipedia. NWE seems to have been entirely ignored. Number of articles in a wiki does not equal level of notability. HrafnTalkStalk 06:00, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: There's no surprise there, and I'd like to see some justification for the link.  What makes this blog an exception to the guidelines on using blogs? WP:SPS seems pretty clear on this, so I'm removing it. --Doug Weller (talk) 21:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pro-intelligent design article praised by pro-intelligent design blogger, so?
Talk:Elise Frösslind

message: The Swedish "recetträttigheter" apparantly translates to either "recipe rights" or "benefit rights" in English. Can anyone fluent in Swedish distinguish whether these rights are referring to the artist's "creative content rights" or perhaps their "receipt-rights"? The former might protect style, method, or technique while the latter might insure a percentage of profits or some other financial assistance. A better translation might explain the context of the strike more clearly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Science (talk • contribs) 16:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am fluent in Swedish, and have read the books cited. (I am not as fluent in English though!) The "recett" rights was, as I understand, simply that the whole income from one night's peformance, was given to one of the participating artists alone. This was very popular among the actors, and was often combined with the right to decided what play was to be performed on "thier" night, and so forth. So I believe your first alternative is the best equivalent. This was as far as I have undestood the matter anywhay, but better get someone else to confirm it just in case. --85.226.235.248 (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defining recett-rights or "recetträttigheter"