lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tobermory, Mull

message: Policy for UK towns is to state town and county (or island), not town and country.  This is necessary for disambiguation reasons. -- Derek Ross
:When was this decided?  I was under the impression no agreement had been reached on this. Warofdreams 18:38, 5 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: The last "agreement" that I'm aware of was reached sometime near the end of 2002.  However these agreements tend to switch backwards and forwards in my experience so you're probably right -- no agreement may well be the case at the moment.  In the absence of agreement, I prefer to rely on logic.  And to me logic says that while there are towns such as Letham (in Fife and in Angus) or Newburgh (all over the place), disambiguating by county is going to be much more effective than disambiguating by Scotland/England. -- Derek Ross 23:18, 5 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: In the case of islands, disambiguation by island seems by far the most sensible option - far more people know that Tobermory is on Mull than know that it's in Argyll and Bute. This article was at Tobermory, Mull until it got moved last June, and we already have Bridgend, Islay, Calgary, Mull et al (and I can't find any counter-examples). If there are no objections I'm going to move this back to Tobermory, Mull, since "Tobermory, Argyll and Bute" sounds horrible. --Blisco 13:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Blisco 11:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Does it rhyme with Murray, Gory or Sorry? - Kittybrewster  (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ?Gory?--MacRusgail 22:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounciation
Talk:SPITBOL

message: Just a note to say that I wrote the original... I wasn't logged in then. -- Rochkind
There was already a stub article at SPITBOL.  However I have made a redirect to this one which is better.  I have also removed it from VfD since it should never have been there in the first place. Also note that you should sign your talk to avoid confusion with following comments. You can do this by typing in three or four ~ characters in a group. I have taken the liberty of signing your comment for you this time. -- Derek Ross 18:49, 5 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: SNOBOL4 programs run under SPITBOL are amazingly fast.
This article is amazingly bad. --142.177.99.202 (talk) 01:29, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, it reads as if written by an naive beginner programmer. It's neither measured nor neutral.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.176.129 (talk) 15:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  wtf 

message: Where to find various implementations would be useful info.  E.g., I'd like a Windows10 executable, if there is such a thing.  I suspect that there isn't, but it would be nice to know for sure just what there was and where to find it. 31.52.253.69 (talk) 13:30, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implementations
Talk:Russian Civil War

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. See snow close by another editor at Talk:Wagner Group rebellion#Requested move 23 August 2023.  Station1 (talk) 23:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Russian Civil War →  – The second civil war already happened. 89.122.39.11 (talk) 13:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose.  Killuminator (talk) 18:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

text: *Oppose and WP:SNOW close, it isn't happening- same IP made a req to move Wagner Group rebellion to Second Russian Civil War and that request was unanimously shut down - presidentofyes, the super aussa man 22:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 August 2023 

message: There was zero consideration with the members when the infobox was heavily reduced. I find this unappealing to me as a reader of Wikipedia because it removes the aspect of it being a massive conflict.  Nusciii (talk) 14:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The removing of the infobox  

message: We seem to have two different ideas about how much information should be in the infobox for this article.  Here are the two most recent versions.  Which do you prefer?  WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choose an infobox 

message: * I don't care.  My only interest is in getting a decision made, so the edit warring will stop.  I will notify Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history in the hope that someone there will have good advice.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Responses
Talk:Milk

message: I'm just curious what lead to this. ERBuermann (talk) 14:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: maybe lewd jokes were inserted?🤷‍♀️ 2600:8801:FB13:6B00:581F:9C4C:FBDF:E4DC (talk) 02:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably correct. The protection log simply says “vandalism” and people comparing it to… you know… is the only real reason I can imagine the page getting protected. CharlieEdited (talk) 15:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Lots of health wankery around milk too. Bon courage (talk) 15:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Interestingly enough,"breast milk" isn't a protected page 72.199.14.210 (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article semi-protected? 

message: I believe the type of feral cat is misidentified. It states "African" feral cats have been reported to directly pilfer milk, but the source cited only references feral cats at Isla de Guadalupe. Crypticgimmick (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interspecies Milk Consumption - Feral Cats 

message: It's really weird that this article is a combination of the article on the concept of mammary gland secretion as a general mammalian biology subject, which is what it should be, but even more (content-wise) the article about human consumption of dairy products (primarily bovine but also caprid). Maybe we need a Milk (food) split off, or just merge the human consumption material into Dairy product. It's weird further that Milk (food) is a redlink.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  06:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split? 

message: Could we list items like mashed potatoes that use milk as an ingredient? MightyArms (talk) 18:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-dairy items that use milk as an ingredient
Talk:Robert Peary

message: What does this mean?
(in "1989 National Geographic Society studies") Herbert, who reached the Pole in 1969, is recognized as the first man leading a team to reach it."  All of the other expeditions between 1909 and 1969 didn't exist?  
Apparently this means he was the first to reach it on foot (assuming that Peary's accomplishment is discarded).  That's a big difference.
I will note that this fact gives him a conflict of interest: he has a vested interest in stating Peary did not make the pole. Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 19:16, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First to reach pole
Talk:Modern flat Earth beliefs

message: This statement deserves to be in the article. 
"There are many Flat Earth Societies all around the globe"   
It was removed for no reason.
 RamotHacker (talk) 06:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it because it is an old joke, not very funny, but most of all because it did not support the mission to build a serious and respected encyclopedia, see WP:NOTEVERYTHING. It is not the first time this has been added to (and removed from) Flat Earth articles, so this removal followed Wikipedia consensus. Sjö (talk) 06:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two "The Flat Earth Societies".  One referred to in the article is at [tfes.org].  The other is at [theflatearthsociety.org].  Both are mentioned in the 2016 article from the New Yorker Inside ‘Flat Earth,’ Tila Tequila’s New Belief System and the Wokest Conspiracy Theory of 2016.  I'm not sure how to add this to the article given its current construction.  It's also not clear if either of these "organizations" are incorporated or registered in any way.--Nowa (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are many Flat Earth Societies all around the globe 

message: The vehemence is tangible… I get that flat earth is bullshit, but Wikipedia has a neutral voice policy for a reason. Please uphold it. 96.232.183.53 (talk) 00:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: NPOV doesn't mean that we don't call complete bullshit bullshit. Rather, the opposite. We get more than a few readers who believe in this nonsense. Acroterion (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As a corollary to "calling bullshit "bullshit", while some flat-earthers are just low-IQ and ignorant, many of these people are bad faith bullshitters, and it is appropriate to treat them with the contempt they deserve. There's plenty of Wikipedia contempt for those that dabble in "race realism", and so there is plenty of precedent to treat bad faith bullshitters in the manner that they deserve.2603:8081:3A00:414A:81A5:363F:2B7:1512 (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Domain of NPOV is opinions. There can be no neutrality about scientific facts as they are not opinions. One of Wikipedia's purposes it so stand such neutrality. Lajoswinkler (talk) 14:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vehement voice  

message: Should there not be a section with a bunch of different proofs that the earth is a rough sphere and/or a bunch of flat earth "arguments" that are clearly disproved? 146.231.177.14 (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Instead, we should link to pages that do that. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added a link to Empirical evidence for the spherical shape of Earth to "See also". Koopinator (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an external link with arguments used by flat-earthers and the arguments against them. Sjö (talk) 06:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proofs for the skeptical
Wikipedia talk:Requested articles/geography

message: ====Afghanistan====
*blah
====United States====
*blah also
:but there was an intermediate version as you describe it. Morwen 11:21, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography

message: *blah also
:but there was an intermediate version as you describe it. Morwen 11:21, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: United States

message: *Afghanistan
**Blah
*Australia
**Blah
This way it is much easier for the eye to follow the alphabetization of the major categories. Kingturtle 11:28, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography

message: The section is ridiculously long compared to the others and definitely needed breaking up.  Morwen 11:33, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: That solution would be better. That is how we solved the Countries part. Kingturtle 11:35, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography: Canada
Talk:United States v. Nixon

message: This page reads as if everyone should automatically know the background to this, and what Nixon did, or even who he was. It was 30 years ago, so do you think a short, explanatory preamble, would help? Moriori 01:28, Dec 6, 2003 (UTC)
:What the heck?  It's been two years and this article is still a piece of crap?  There's no background, no supreme court infobox, NOTHING on this page.  I'm adding cleanup tag to this Hbdragon88 04:37, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever the two notes above may have been seeking, this added material may be suitable to a free-standing article on the case, but not to a hyper-lk'd encyclopedia article. If there is anything in there not covered by Watergate scandal, it should be extracted and added to that article but not this one.  I've replaced it in this article with material that says about Watergate only what is needed to grasp this topic; users wanting more information than that on Watergate or Nixon can and should refer to their articles.--Jerzy•t 08:00, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comments

message: The article explains what a subpoena is, what "quash" means in a legal context, etc.  This should be done with wikilinks to the appropriate articles, not with definitions in this article.  I've made corresponding changes to the article. Dr. Sunglasses 02:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links in preference to inline definitions 

message: Is it known why Rehnquist recused himself?  Should be in the article if known.  Tempshill (talk) 22:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a note and citation on this to the article. NW (Talk) (How am I doing?) 01:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did Rehnquist recuse himself? 

message: This case is getting a lot of legwork lately. US v. Nixon has been repeatedly cited by prosecutors in all of Trump's legal troubles, as well as by judges. One recent example is the judge from the Jan 6. trial ruling Trump had no presidential immunity. Worth including on this article? Delukiel (talk) 22:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donald Trump
Talk:Zipf–Mandelbrot law

message: Is this the same thing as Zipf's law?  Unless it is more general, probably the two articles should be merged.  Michael Hardy 02:23, 6 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Olavo Bilac

message: I wonder if you liked the prose enough? Bilac is my favourite poet.
Is there any chance I will see a link for this page in the main Wikipedia page in a few days, in Bilac´s anniversary? - Doidimais Brasil
Doidimais: What exactly do you mean by "Bilac was chased during the government of Floriano Peixoto"? Was he forced into exile? Did he flee the country? Was he persecuted (badgered, hounded, harassed) by the govt? What exactly did Floriano do to him?  Oh, and the translations on /sources/ -- are they yours? Curious, –Hajor 19:45, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: older entries
Talk:San Jose State University

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. As laid out in the discussion, current name appears to be the WP:COMMONNAMEcommon name. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 15:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: San Jose State University →  – The official name and corresponding logos contain an accent over the e. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 19:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 October 2022 

message: San Jose State University → San José State University
The official name of the institution is San José State University (with diacritical mark included), and has been this way now for at least a decade. Many page-one Google search returns for "San Jose State University" include the diacritical mark. These search returns include the university's official website, all of the university's official social media feeds, the latest USNWR college rankings and Glassdoor. ESPN also includes the diacritical mark in all of its SJSU athletics coverage. 
Why are we resisting referring to SJSU correctly and accurately? A Wiki page move here helps to clear the air and basically set the record state. Let Wikipedia lead by example as any legitimate encyclopedic enterprise should.
In Wiki's own published essay on this topic, it states:
"Particular care is taken to spell personal names correctly." 
Moreover, the essay states: "Accuracy (the lack of diacritics in foreign names is considered a grammatical error or misspelling by several reliable sources), consistency (following the "house style" instead of case-by-case use of the most common spelling), harmlessness (the diacriticless spelling is deducible from the proper noun, but not vice versa), pronunciation guidance, informativeness (an encyclopedia's primary purpose is to educate the readers by providing accurate, complete and trustworthy information) and respect (particularly with living people, knowingly misspelling a name could be both unencyclopedic and unethical)."
Can we put this to a vote again, please? Let's do the right thing here. 
Londonfifo (talk) 04:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 January 2023
Talk:Resurrection (1980 film)

message: This is a powerful movie, which leaves you with an incredible feeling of hope.  Its the first movie that ever moved my husband to tears.  I haven't seen it for about 15 years, but it is frequently on my mind.  A must see.
I don't see what the WP France template is for... Hoverfish Talk 19:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i have this movie on dvd copied it over from video tape if you would like a copy email me at a_m_bracken@yahoo.co.uk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.154.206 (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ressurection
Talk:USS America (CV-66)

message: Diesel and/or Heavy oil powered ?--— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 03:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  fuel? 

message: The article is written like a story or novel, not like a factual encyclopedia article. It should be reviewed and redone.  77.224.166.216 (talk) 12:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written like a novel 

message: Hello. I am relatively new to this. My Grandfather served on that ship and worked on the jets on there. Why is there nothing on the F-14s on there? It should be, like the other guy said, redone and should include the type of jets it carried. I can try to provide as much information as I can, but no garuntees. 64.130.102.153 (talk) 18:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information
Wikipedia talk:MediaWiki namespace/Archive

message: The current content of MediaWiki:Undo-failure is:
:The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits.
I propose to change this into:
:The edit cannot be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits.
(Underlining for highlighting the difference only.)
Rationale: In the situation in which the user gets to see this message, the edit would not yet have been undone anyway if there had been no conflict; it is only by then saving the page that the edit will be undone, if such is possible.
 --Lambiam 12:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undo-failure 

message: Hi: How could I use the show/hide function (where is that template btw?) to show or hide multiple panes in the list of letters in the "Dining Late with Claude La Badarian" article. I would like to hide by default all of the panes that show the References section in the list of letters at the bottom of the article, and by one click to show them all. This is of some importance since by default I want the list of letters to be shortened. I appreciate any help you could offer.Manhattan Samurai (talk) 21:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show/hide function
Wikipedia talk:Template index

message: redirects here. Please indicate HELP:Templates and WP:WikiProject Templates as well
Add the hatnote
-- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not done. Both the WikiProject and the Help page are already on the page. Viewer719/Contribs! 11:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: I couldn't find links or templates for citing other dictionaries similar to the ones for Wiktionary. So the equivalent to this Wiktionary category: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:English_reference_templates --Espoo (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: dictionary reference templates
Talk:Semisimple

message: These definitions may not all be correct, or the accepted ones. We do seem to need a page like this.
Charles Matthews 08:22, 6 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_weight#Fundamental_weight
links to this page in the phrase "Lie subalgebra consisting of semi-simple elements" yet "semi-simple elemet of a Lie Algebra" is not defined here.
Dewa 20:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  semi-simple elements of an algebra?
Talk:St Martin's Cathedral, Bratislava

message: It was added to the culture monument list in 1963, not 2002
http://www.pamiatky.sk/po/po/Details?id=261
Where is the cathedral? How old is it? Who built it? Wetman 09:02, 6 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Stray comments

message: What is a "concathedral" (and how is it different from a "cathedral")? I can't find "concathedral" in any dictionary. --Math2000 23:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can find a proper definition here: Co-cathedral.  Adelshaus (talk) 19:40, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The great "concathedral" mystery

message: I accidentally did  not realize that this tag was put on in an earlier version so I removed it but i think this is a very important historical Hungarian building because it is the Hungarian coronation church , so the WikiProject Hungary tag would be rightful here.
I can not accept Tulkolahten' opinion  that ":this is a long time consensus. WikiProjects of other countries don't belong to other countries"
Nmate (talk) 09:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Hungary
Talk:Eight-thousander

message: Turkish climber Tunc Findik and Swiss climber Sophie Lavaud. They have both recently completed the 14 peaks. Can someone please add their names to the list. 86.185.53.186 (talk) 09:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a reference for that? thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 11:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two more climbers have completed the 14 peaks 

message: Tenjen Lama Sherpa has climbed K2 today and thus completed all 14 of the 8000 meter peaks. 
He and Kristin Harila have now set the speed record by climbing these 14 peaks in just 3 months and 1 day.
Can someone please add his name to the list. Thank you. 86.146.149.120 (talk) 09:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new 14 8000m peak summiteer 

message: Mexican climber Viridiana Alvarez has recently climbed her 14th and final 8000m peak. She climbed these peaks between the years of 2015 and 2023.
Can someone please add her name to the list. 86.146.149.120 (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new 14 8000m peak climber 

message: Nirmal Purja now has 42 total ascents of 8000 meter peaks, surpassing the record of 38 held by Kami Rita Cl2kliss (talk) 13:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most ascents update 

message: I think we should take the "death statistics" out of the main "List of first ascents" table, and move it to the section on death statistics? It would reduce the width of the main table, and would appear as a smaller table on its own as the rows would be narrower? Aszx5000 (talk) 10:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this idea. Szelma W (talk) 21:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I'm going to try and do it. ?! Aszx5000 (talk) 19:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it worked - might try to justify the text beside the death statistics table. Aszx5000 (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of first ascents table 

message: Can someone please add Chris Warner (USA) who reached #14 w the ascent of Manaslu Sept 20, 2023. 200.10.106.212 (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Climbers to Ascend all 8000m peaks
Talk:Jay Leno

message: Jimmy Fallon host of Tonight Show not Conan O'Brien 2600:1700:80B0:BE0:142:8FC1:17A8:E78D (talk) 07:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conan O'Brien did not take over for Jay Leno. Jimmy Fallon is the host of the Tonight Show. 

message: ...is a collection of opinions by peers who are disproportionately critical, rather than the public. I think this section deserves a re-write. 174.193.133.95 (talk) 15:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Public image" section 

message: He was named the first (but not last) Godfather of a Carnival cruise ship, the Venezia (Venice). Traditionally its a Godmother. Carnival Firenze (Florence) is getting a Godfather too, 104.218.69.39 (talk) 16:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Godfather of Carnvial Venezia