Talk:Birdy (bicycle)

message: I have removed the section.  The links meant to advertise the companies, and it is non-encyclopeadic to have a link to every single distributor.  Moreover, the internal links were all redlinks.  The appropriate policies and guidelines here are: WP:NOT, WP:SPAM and WP:EL.  Thank you, and have a good day.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section with external links 

message: When I find the time (and if I remember), I'm probably going to nominate this article for deletion as non-notable and an advertisement.  Are there any reasons I shouldn't do so?  --ElKevbo 03:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No more or less reason than to do the same with Bike_Friday, or Moulton_Bicycle. The article is certainly notable to those who wish to know more about folding bicycles, and it is non-notable to those who don't; in that respect, it resembles thousands of others on Wikipedia. Apart from listing the reasons why you might want to buy one, the article also does a reasonable job of presenting the disadvantages, so it's difficult to argue that it's an advertisement. --Stephen Burnett 08:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

text: It is your right to nominate for AfD if you wish but I would vote "keep". There are bound to be reviews in main stream journals and cycle magazines of a bike this well known but they are just tricky to google because of the million blog discussions.    etc etc --BozMo talk 12:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD?

message: I made significant contributions to this page (wrote most of the core text) and have no financial ties to any party associated with the manufacure, distribution, or sales of this bicycle. I feel it represents a balanced view of this bicycle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.84.215.134 (talk) 16:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD?

message: I rated this article start. It needs more references. The sections about recommended usage and price are non-encyclopediacal. The sections thereafter are too small, and should be combined somehow.--EdgeNavidad (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Birdy (bicycle). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://ir.lib.ntust.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/13792
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110910170045/http://www.birdybikes.com/dist.asp to http://www.birdybikes.com/dist.asp
*Added  tag to https://simonbatterbury.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/brompton-vs-birdy-the-folding-bike-wars/
*Added  tag to https://simonbatterbury.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/brompton-vs-birdy-the-folding-bike-wars/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071019070509/http://www.r-m.de:80/produkte/produktfinder/faltgenie/birdy/ to http://www.r-m.de/produkte/produktfinder/faltgenie/birdy/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Birdy (bicycle). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130723180830/http://en.r-m.de/bike/frog/ to http://en.r-m.de/bike/frog/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.r-m.de/produkte/produktfinder/faltgenie/birdy/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified