Talk:Wiley (publisher)

message: :Image:Wiley.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wiley.gif

message: I'm sorry, I can't withhold my disgust: This article was an embarrassment of unsubtantiated foo lifted straight from poorly written marketing materials. I'd appreciate some help bringing it in line with WP style. (Sorry, I'm something of a WP neophyte... I believe there's an "anti-advertising" template somewhere for this, but don't know where or how to implement it.) Thanks, --tgeller (talk) 23:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Found and added the template. Sorry for my earlier tone: It was born of impotence. Viva WP! --tgeller (talk) 23:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree that it is still an issue. First, I think there is a potential WP:COI with  (I have noticed them about this suspicion). Please help me to rephrase the article! − Pintoch (talk) 18:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Please help remove unsubstantiated marketing-speak

message: Hi guys - does anyone disagree that the 'Notable' section should be removed? Firstly, the issue didn't actually involve Wiley at all. Secondly, I don't think this incident is notable in its own right anyway. Finally the only reference that isn't to the blog itself is broken. Unless anyone says otherwise on this page, I'll delete this next time I come by this page (which may be some time). I should say here that I do work at Wiley, and as such will be happy to consider others' viewpoints on this. Hopsyturvy (talk) 13:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: a week is  a long time in wiki; it's done  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hopsyturvy (talk • contribs) 15:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable??

message: * http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118521553/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
* http://www.springerlink.com/content/5h118300k12n4582/
--58.38.42.115 (talk) 06:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the relationship in the following publishers.... 

message: I'm adding a mention of their book on beer by aviation expert Bill Yenne, if nobody minds. Beer is brewed by scientific methods, isn't it...?86.42.218.214 (talk) 16:24, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Book on Guinness

message: They have branched in a timely way in to banking analysis in 2011.86.42.213.177 (talk) 09:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Banking industry

message: If you're going to redirect Van Nostrand-Reinhold to John Wiley & Sons, Van Nostrand-Reinhold should at least appear on the page somewhere. I'm assuming that the person who did this incorrectly assumed that the acquisition of Van Nostrand-Reinhold by Wiley meant that any information about their previous existence as a separate company was now a subject of no interest to anyone, but they could bloody well mention the company somewhere on the page they're redirecting to so that people know why they're on a page about Wiley rather than a page about Van Nostrand-Reinhold.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.221.149.50 (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur heartily; came to WP looking for Van Nostrand and was redirected to an article about Wiley that did not mention Van Nostrand. However, your implicit assumption that the redirect is diminishing the information content of WP is unproven: before the redirect it appears there was nothing. Anyone who has reliable sourced information on Van Nostrand and/or its acquisition by Wiley is free to add a paragraph to the Wiley article.--Lieven Smits (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Van Nostrand-Reinhold 

message: We need to clarify the relationship between John Wiley & Sons and Bloomberg L.P..  The former seems to control Bloomberg Press, while the latter is said to own Bloomberg Businessweek and related properties, meanwhile the style guide The Bloomberg Way, produced by editors of the latter, is published by the former.  What gives?   — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  07:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship between Wiley and Bloomberg 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV: "Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag should discuss concerns on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies. In the absence of such a discussion, or where it remains unclear what the NPOV violation is, the tag may be removed by any editor."
If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: More recently, User:Pintoch added another neutrality tag to this article. Can we do anything to make this article more "neutral?" Jarble (talk) 22:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV template removed  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Wiley & Sons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091001080251/http://www.thebookseller.com/news/94302-wiley-plans-redundancies-in-the-uk-and-australia.html to http://www.thebookseller.com/news/94302-wiley-plans-redundancies-in-the-uk-and-australia.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I feel like when reading the history section of this page, the story of the founder coming to America, founding the print shop, and then the trials of starting a huge company are explained in intimate detail. 
I also feel like Wikipedia notability guidelines promote page creations for only celebrities or people who have had news made about them. Which in itself, is not encyclopedic
(Gabeshootman (talk) 01:12, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I really don't think that the story of how it started is encyclopedic  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on John Wiley & Sons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080419131907/http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-301452,newsId-2343.html to http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-301452,newsId-2343.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101224004224/http://www.marklogic.com/news-and-events/press-releases/2009/announcing-wiley-custom-select-next-generation-custom-publishing-application-powered-by-mark-logic.html to http://www.marklogic.com/news-and-events/press-releases/2009/announcing-wiley-custom-select-next-generation-custom-publishing-application-powered-by-mark-logic.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141020152138/http://www.ulib.niu.edu/publishers/TaylorFrancis.htm to http://www.ulib.niu.edu/publishers/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The redirect John Wiley & Sons Inc. 'A' has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:John Wiley & Sons Inc. 'A']]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Evolutionary Applications has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Evolutionary Applications]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Pesticide Science (journal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pesticide Science (journal)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Weed Research (journal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Weed Research (journal)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]