lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cleo Springs, Oklahoma

message: Unless I am misunderstanding this, the first line in the paragraph about demographics states:
"As of the census[1] of 2000, there were 326 people, 135 households, and 90 families residing in the town. The population density was 580.1 people per square mile (224.8/km²)"
How can the city of Cleo Springs have a pop. density of 580.1 when the physical population in 2000 was 326 people? I looked at the wiki for "Population Density" and it describes it as (total people in a given area) / (measurement of that area, typically in square km or mi).
Just pointing this out as it seems incorrect.
12.191.82.166 (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographic Information 
Talk:Learning Curve (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: Can anyone find a source (from ST:The Magazine or TV Guide or somesuch) that explains why this was the unintentional season 1 finale? I think it's worth mentioning. Wl219 00:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Stop changing the episode numbers because you watched this on Netflix, Netflix is not the owner. Netflix lists all episodes as (n), but the makers and current owner CBS lists all episodes as (n+1), because the first episode is considered as episode 1 & 2. CptBearguy (talk) 20:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode & production numbers
Category talk:Monarchs of the United Kingdom

message: The Anglican Communion (including Church of England) does not call itself protestant, but reformed catholic. Shouldn't they be under "Anglican Monarchs" nor "Protestant Monarchs"? --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:58, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Protestant?

message: Per  
Should this category be depopulated?  (Likewise :Category:British monarchs and :Category:English monarchs)
Strictly applying OVERCAT to remove all pages from these because they're in the per-century subcategories would be a bad change. It would seriously devalue these overall categories as a listing of all such monarchs, and as a navigational feature. It is not common knowledge such that we can simply assume it for our readers to known the century to which Henry IV belonged.  
There is also a concern from WP:PERFCAT, which is regularly cited to delete categorisation for groups such as "Cold War aircraft". Now I wouldn't go that far, but  :Category:English monarchs is very strongly defining in a way that "British monarchs of the 11th century" is much less so.
OVERCAT is a regular source of damaging edits to the overall performance of the encyclopedia, in the pursuit of a pointless dogmatism. We shouldn't make that mistake yet again. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depopulate?
Talk:Crowder, Oklahoma

message: Whoever deleted the aricle of notable residents should not have. Unless you have been to crowder, or have proof, that Dane is not one of the most notable residents in the city.
As Crowder is simply a school with a few houses around it, notable residents inside the school are notable residents of the community.
As at least 4 residents of Crowder contributed to the article, I believe it should stay. Unless you can get 4 residents of Crowder who say Dane is not notable, You're only crippling your information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.150.110.231 (talk • contribs) 
:Two of the core policies of Wikipedia are Wikipedia:Verifiability, which states that "editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed," and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, which says, "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."  The material added passes neither of these acid tests for inclusion in Wikipedia.  You must, at the very least, cite a reliable source if the information is to be re-added.  See also Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day.  --Dynaflow babble 00:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not informed of the issue here, but I did happen to notice you saying all your work was lost. This is not so. You can go to the edit history of the page, and view any older version. You could simply view the page as it was with your edits, then copy and past it into your word processor to continue work on the article ~Pip 02:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pastafarianism is verifiable through reliable sources, and is a notable exception to WP:MADEUP.  Dane-ism can be included and even have its own article, but only if it has been the subject of coverage in reliable sources, such as books, newspapers, reliable websites, etc.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 01:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable residents
Talk:List of Little Mosque on the Prairie episodes

message: That's cool!
Does anyone know when the 9th episode comes out?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.104.189.215 (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The season has finished, but CBC has renewed the series for a second season. -- Underneath-it-All 02:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 9th Episode?

message: For what it's worth, I just watched Episode 5, "The Convert", on CBC Television.  The guest star, playing the Convert character, looked to me like Justin Long of the Get a Mac ad campaign.  Unfortunately I haven't been able to find any verifiable source to confirm this, and it's possible I'm just plain wrong.  I'll record this observation here in the off-chance that it's helpful to someone else. --Jdlh  | Talk 06:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On TV.com Brandon McGibbon is listed as playing Marlon, the convert. -- Underneath-it-All 12:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

text: For what it's worth, the credits at the beginning of the episode also mentions Brandon McGibbon as Marlon.Superwad 05:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast for Episode 5, "The Convert"
Talk:Charles Wyndham (actor)

message: Can anyone correct the last line, "When James Albery died in 1931, Charles married his widow" ?
Charles Wyndham died in 1919.
Canfan 03:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2007 Ohio State Buckeyes football team

message: "Though the LSU run was simply too much to overcome, the Buckeyes added two more touchdowns to make a respectable final score."
This section of the NC game is anaccurate.  The Buckeyes did not make two touchdowns in a row late in the game to make the "score respectable."  After traded posessions when LSU went on a 31-0 run, the score was 31-10.  OSU scored near the end of the third quarter (after a Jenkins INT), to cut the lead to 31-17, thus ending the 31-0 run.  It was a two score game for the majority of the fourth quarter, until LSU drove, and made it 38-17.  THEN, OSU added a late, and by then, irrelevant, touchdown to make the score more respectable at 38-24.  By saying the Buckeyes "added two more touchdowns to make it respectable" implies LSU went on a 38-0 run, which did not happen.  Therefore, making it incorrect.  Just thought I'd point this out.  GregTheVirus (talk) 01:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fix the bump RC-0722 communicator/kills 03:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NC game analysis 
Talk:History of road transport

message: I created this page out of the road transport article because I think road transport deserved a decent historical article (compare the enormous amount of stuff linked to history of rail transport).  But it is coverly very deficient and has no sources.--Grahamec 03:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a reasonable general account, but relies rather too much on just two sources.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation 

message: Why is there no reference to Indian roads like the Grand Trunk Road in this article?
It was built in the  1500s and finds no mention, but American roads made in the 18th century are mentioned?
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because most en.WP contributors are from the US, with the UK second (I suspect) and that neither group know much about Indian roads....which is where you come in! EdJogg (talk) 11:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you not add a new subsection to the Ancient Roads section?  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  India 

message: The section on Macadam claims that he developed a road surface material containing a mixture of soil and broken stone, but also says he was adamant that the stone should not be mixed with any other material.  This seems inconsistent.  I'm not sure which is correct, but I think Macadam's own method used only broken stone on the surface, whereas later engineers tended to add a binding material such as marl or chalk.  Also (incidentally) from reading some 19th century texts on road building, I don't think Macadam's approach was as successful as the current article implies.  Most road-builders believed (or found from experience) that heavy wagons and carriages broke up the surface layer and let water through, so that a strong Telford-style base was essential to prevent the road surface sinking into mud.86.183.202.215 (talk) 10:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency on Macadam? 

message: I noticed that brick roads are not mentioned at all within the article, which seems to me like an oversight. The Wikipedia article on Pavement (Architecture), as well as the article of Brick, has some of such information, but here it's absent. Pavement with brick may not have been popular for very long, but I think it worth at least a mention.
2607:FCC8:FFC0:A0:117F:2ECA:3D69:525C (talk) 04:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brick Roads 
Talk:Arther Ferrill

message: 1600 ghits, but most are term papers citing his books. To find the good ones, it is necessary to check them all. 
Notable history professor, but a few years before the web. 
sources supplied, more can be found. DGG 03:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing against Ferrill but from my searching I couldn't find anything that lived up to the WP:N "that a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, reliable published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself" - all I found were term papers and wikipedia mirror sites. I'm going to nominate this as an AfD to see what other wikipedians think. Madmedea 10:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: AfD and prod were based on wrong spelling (not fault of nominator).  But subsequent research with the right spelling is showing notabillit and a broader article is developing.  --Kevin Murray 16:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Misspelled Name should be "Arther" not "Arthur"
Talk:Personal Internet Communicator

message: According to the 2007 January  Monitor magazine, Advanced Micro Design (AMD) has ceased production/manufacturing of the PIC citing low sales figures and a lack of interest from its target market. 
Source: "BYTEbeat: AMD cans cheap PC project", Monitor Magazine, Volume 14 edition 6, pg 18 - Ottawa, ON
Dhd 03:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ohio National Guard

message: I'm planning on adding additional content to this article detailing the history of the Ohio National Guard. I'm also planning on adding citations for the starting paragraph and talking of the accolades the organization has received.CheeseBurgerDude79 (talk) 19:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Content 

message: Im not entierly sure what is meant by m1 military rifle, but I believe the m1 Garand was what it meant. I linked it in case people wish to read more about the firearm. If this is wrong, I encourge a correction. PowersD (talk) 19:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  M1- rifle Kent shootings
Talk:Vermont National Guard

message: List needs to be pared down to "just a list." bios belong in separate articles. Watch copyvio. Somebody got this from someplace. Details relating to Guard need to be placed into History. Article is about organization not people! Student7 (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Generals

message: The bios suggest that pre-CW prep was useful/organized, etc. Instead, there are lots of reliable sources that suggest it was anything but. There were just a handful of people available at the start of the war. They had mustered once a year on the village green, shooting rifles in the air. They were really untrained and unequipped. Anything that suggests otherwise is fictional. No one person's fault. The case throughout the country, including the South. Governor Fairbanks realized this at the outset of the War, deliberately stepping down after a one year term, and presumably dying of the stress! Student7 (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: pre-Civil War prep

message: (Deleted by author.  Have discussed with other party and am satisfied that we are now in agreement on how best to proceed.)
Vttor (talk) 19:38, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for Improvement 

message: For a response to the comments above.
Thanks,
Billmckern (talk) 11:00, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: See my contributor's talk page
Talk:Dominic Masters

message: I added the {POV} tag - for example the current article contains wording such as - "This contract was perhaps prompted after much hype from the NME music magazine and a series of energetic and memorable live performances, including playing on the Abbey Road crossing, the BBC Television Centre and on a London Underground Tube." Citiable sources or deletion, please.  Thank you,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 02:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The World's Most Dangerous Places

message: I didn't tag this but I agree: notable and interesting subject, but this reads like a fan or employee wrote it. --A Good Anon 03:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: input

message: Well actually, Robert has the Temple Fielding travel guide concession.  Frommer (also ex-CIA like Fielding) is more middle and upper class in reading. 20:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Travel guide"
Talk:Helheim (band)

message: This article is written in an opinionated format. This is poor form for an encyclopedia and should be rewritten or deleted.
Captain panda Mussolini ha sempre tarche Sign Here 03:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tightened some things up. We could use some hyperlinks. Dancouvert (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean wikilinks? or sources? Because this article doesn't need more Wikilinks, it needs references--independent, third-party, in-depth references. (And it still needed lots of tightening.) Drmies (talk) 04:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: tighten the wad

message: This should really be moved to Helheim (band) as Helheim is a name for the location also called Hel which I was searching for. I think that a loaction from Norse Mythology that is hundreds of years old has priority over some "band". Sigurd Dragon Slayer (talk) 03:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Corel Painter

message: I left the internal link as "Fractal Design Expression" even though it was also MetaCreations and Creature House, just so the un-wiki familiar will not assume this is a dictionary link to the meaning of Expression as a representation through art and ignore it.. (because I polled some friends, and they do think that way) --Armandoban 18:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fractal Design Expression 
Talk:Rick Aviles

message: 1. I made a search to see if there were any  reliable verifiable sources which would cite that Aviles' mother was of Venezuelan descent and could not find any, however references do indicate that his parents were Puerto Rican. Therefore, the original text was placed once more with a reference as required by policy.
2. Replaced the "External links" with "real" external links. Wikilinks are not considered external links. External links are for links to websites outside of Wikipedia which have to deal with the subject of the article and not for "internal links". Tony the Marine (talk) 17:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: According to what I've read, his death occurred March 17, 1995. How is it that he was the voice of the cockroach in Joe's apartment in 1996?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlhsuffolk (talk • contribs) 06:32, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Anthony Aviles 

message: Aviles was not an "Afican-American", unless there is a source which states that he identified as such, categories which state that he was will be removed. Aviles was a Hispanic of mixed races (Mulatto) of Puerto Rican descent.
We are not here to judge a person's ancestery just because he or she is dark skinned. In Puerto Rico there are many people who are dark skinned who are descendant of people from India and the Middle East. That is why we in Wikipedia require that additions to bios. cite and provide reliable verifiable sources. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: African-American?

message: | death_cause = Complications Of AIDS
82.5.93.100 (talk) 15:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 15:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2016 

message: The cited sources mention nothing about heroine use, so I have removed that from the article. Additionally, the Variety obituary from the time of his death cites that he died of heart failure and there is no mention of HIV or AIDS. There is a discrepancy in sources as to the cause to the cause of death, so I have carefully alluded to that fact in the article by simply stating what was said about his death in each source and when it was said. Best.4meter4 (talk) 22:07, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Care with presentation of death
Talk:Racine Lutheran High School

message: Apparantly, Racine Lutheran High School is considered "better" than The Prairie School because, although they are both high schools in Racine, WI, The Prairie School's page was DELETED while Racine Lutheran's was NOT. unsigned comment by 68.77.250.103
* This one will probably end up getting deleted as well based on WP:SCHOOL. My personal view is that all high schools are inheriently notable (I think this used to be the policy). I would like lots of high school articles as the students frequently vandalise them - learning about wikipedia in the process.  If you think The Prairie School is notable in some way, recreate it with some good references. AntiVan 00:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Prairie School 
Talk:Brown Grand Theatre

message: A few comments. 
*Could use some sectioning. Follow the guidelines at WP:LEAD when composing the article intro.
*The Kansas State Historic Preservation Office may have the National Register Nomination Form available online or by request, poke around on their website, these are usually pretty good sources.
*While external linking is one way to do citations it is probably the least preferred way on Wikipedia, would suggest another method, inlines would probably work well, since that is essentially what the external jumps are working as.
*This sentence: Renaissance in style and overall design, the $40,000 structure became a priceless jewel amid rare aesthetic fiches in a small town in turn of the century mid-America.
:*Needs some NPOV work, priceless jewel according to whom? Usually there are good NPOV ways to describe the architecture.
That's it for now, I may make a few tweaks, you may need to do some restructuring when you put in some sections. Btw, your peer review request isn't complete above. IvoShandor 07:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes from IvoShandor
Talk:Ray Murphy Jr.

message: This article strikes me as being written more like an essay than an encyclopedia entry. While Murphy was no doubt an amazing human being, we must strive to be impartial. Some claims need to be sourced, like his status as an Olympic hopeful and how important he was in developing sip and puff technology, which will also help with the tone. --Danger (talk) 19:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

message: prod said:Entirely unreferenced, little assertion of notability, looks like one more university publication. Can't find a thing for secondary sources on this.
However, this is a long-established peer reviewed scientific journal, indexed in all the standard indexing service (which are the usual secondary sources for peer reviewed journals). 8000 is a very high circulation for a scholarly journal--the average is 1000-1500.  All of this was trivial to find on the web. All established peer-reviewed scientific journals published by scholarly publishers, (including scholarly commercial publishers, academic societies, and universities) that are indexed in the literature services  for their field, are notable, and are accepted as Reliable Sources in WP. There are about 2000 in WP now; there are another 6 or 7 thousand currently published ones of national  or international significance, and articles for all of them are planned, though it will take 2 or 3 years.  After that, plans are to start in on the 20,000 or so earlier ones, and start considering the  smaller journals that are nonetheless indexed somewhere,  if there's any energy left. (see WP:List of missing journals, helped by  all the science and academic article editors adding references that cite these journals). 
Glad to discuss further if they are questions DGG 04:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article currently states, "Recently JABA has noticed a lowering in its impact factor."  This seems slightly unclear (when is "recently"?) and the sentence isn't cited.  I can't tell whether it's meant to be cited to the review-of-literature study which supports the next sentence or not; I couldn't find an explicit citation in a quick skim of that study, but I'm a layman and I may have missed something.  It would be good if that could be reworded to be clearer, or if it's not supported by anything, it should probably be removed. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 20:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impact factor?
Category talk:Musical trios

message: Shouldn't this category really be named 'musical trios'?--HisSpaceResearch 04:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Shouldn't the Stray Cats be on this list as well?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.51.218.38 (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stray Cats

message: Shouldn't this and the category Vocal Trios be merged?--VMAsNYC (talk) 18:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge w/category Vocal Trios?

message: They may be a trio now, but the classic lineup is a quartet. DandyDan2007 (talk) 11:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  REM in category?