lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Status quo ante

message: I turned it into a disambig page.  If there's a question about what it should be redirected to, a disambig page is the way to go.
Another option would be to restore this version  of the article - I don't see any good reason that it was done away with other than the lack of source material / notability of the phrase outside the context of war. BigDT 15:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I favour the latter option.  HistoryBA 01:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status quo post of this page 

message: Every link I've seen refers to status quo ante bellum. Perhaps we can turn this into a redirect for that and instead put a hatnote at the top of status quo ante bellum, eg "You may also be looking for reset button technique". Serasuna (talk) 23:35, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[status quo ante bellum]]?
Talk:Classical guitar music

message: It seems that, since a significant portion of the repertoire consists of transcriptions from cello, violin, piano, and lute, that a list (possibly seperate?) should also exist. Bach's Chaconne in D minor and Albeniz's Leyenda come to mind immediately although with Julian Bream's work, possibly Dowland could be included as well.
Also, a description of style or at least a difficulty level would be usefull information.
--Amazzing5 16:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional information 

message: This list is strongly weighted towards modern compositions. For instance there is only one piece by Sor (which is probably one of his more significant pieces), but almost every piece written by Angelo Gilardino and Leo Brouwer (not that I think that Brouwer's music is unsignificant; clearly it is). Possibly some of these pieces should be trimmed out since this page is supposed to contain the most significant solo pieces. --Amazzing5 15:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much information?? 

message: I don't know whether anybody reads these things since I'm the only one who has posted, but with the recent changes to this page it now has very little to do with classical guitar music and is now mostly a duplicate of classical guitar composers. --Amazzing5 14:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page is off-topic
Talk:Thomas Lowell Tucker

message: Can anyone confirm or deny the allegation that Thomas Lowell Tucker's death was in retaliation to Steven Green's heinous acts, because they were from the same unit?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.66.58 (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steven Dale Green 

message: I'd like to have the merge discussion on Talk:Kristian Menchaca, if that's alright with everyone. TomTheHand 16:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop removing the merge notice.  It's only been up for one day.  You apparently agreed at one point and then changed your mind, and Bnguyen disagrees.  I and Pharos agree with the merge.  Let's keep discussion on Talk:Kristian Menchaca so it's all in one place. TomTheHand 12:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Hu Gadarn, if you'd like, please participate in the discussion on Talk:Kristian Menchaca about what to name the merged article. TomTheHand 17:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: And that is also the only reason why they are notable. Edrigu 23:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason a researcher would want to know about about the individuals involved in the notable incident would be for personal information. This information is specific to each person. For organizational reasons and just plain being consistent these shouldn't be merged. But I do think all common information about this kidnapping by put in a new article to avoid redundency and allow for describing the whole incident such as the 3rd person killed a little better. (I put my DISAGREE on the other talk page) --SirYoda 08:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Kristian Menchaca 

message: Removed dead links and poorly sourced material of a sensitive nature. Do not reinsert without good sources from reliable sources/ --FloNight 23:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cleaned up article
Talk:Boston, Revere Beach and Lynn Railroad

message: Was the former/future terminus of the line really at Lynn (MBTA station) on the Newburyport/Rockport Line, or is this just a glitch that deserves a renaming? ----DanTD (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The terminus was at Market Street, about where Harrison Court intersects nowadays. Very close to Lynn-Central Square depot, especially before the tracks were grade separated (in 1912?). Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Lynn Station 

message: Title and date from information provided by Leslie Jones or the Boston Public Library on the negative or negative sleeve:
http://ark.digitalcommonwealth.org/ark:/50959/6682x9007. Washburn Ave runs right alongside where the Blue Line (MBTA) runs today.  --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blizzard
Talk:Proprietary colony

message: The article lists four types of British colonies: proprietary, royal, joint stock, and covenant.  Currently, British Colony redirects to Crown Colony, apparently a synonym for Royal Colony.  Offhand I think it would be good to have up to five articles to cover these kinds of colonies.  British Colony would give an overview of the similarities and differences.  Then there would potentially be an article on each of the four types.  Currently there are articles on two of the types.  Well, so I would ask someone who is so inclined and curious or already in the know to create a general article on British Colony.  Such would have descriptions of all four kinds.  Thank you for your consideration.CountMacula (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  General article on British colonies, and articles on specific kinds of British colonies. 

message: I will try to reorganize the article if I remember to do so, but I have no expertise in this subject. Here are some problems I have identified.
* Intro does not say what a proprietary colony is
* Intro includes much that is not in the body
* Intro claims 4 kinds of colonies and then mentions a fifth
* Intro talks about Charles II rewarding friends with proprietary colonies but says nothing about whether other monarchs created proprietary colonies or if other types of colonies were used to reward friends (which seems like saying "Emily Dickinson sometimes wore hats" in the intro to a hats article that never even says what hats are)
* Only the first 2 paragraphs of the historical precedent section are about historical precedent (fixed-ish by creating new sections out of this section, but someone should check that I have not messed anything up)
* It is not clear whether the lists of colonies are supposed to be lists of proprietary colonies (it seems unlikely that all of the British American colonies were proprietary, but the article mentions all of them)
* The article lists "French examples" despite saying that proprietary colonies are English (fixed-ish by placing this section as a subsection of a new "similar practices" section) 
* All of the examples given are from the Americas, but the article is not clear about whether this was a practice specific to the Americas 
Rscragun (talk) 04:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems of organization and focus
Template talk:Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

message: See template for the Israeli-arab conflict on the serbian wiki (link) Greetings,--TheFEARgod 11:36, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice idea but it would mean a lot of work cuz every picture has its own licence Baku87 15:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the appearance 

message: I strongly feel that Monte should be listed under USA.  He spent 4 years in Armenia/Karabakh, and was clearly born, raised, and by citizenship, from the USA.  He also spent a good deal of time in Iran, Lebanon, etc.  So I think listing him under the Armenian flag is a bit misleading when you have the Russian and Soviet flags as well....  --RaffiKojian 12:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Melkonian was not a representative of the US military or government. Opposed to that, there are both provable peacekeeping operations and assertions of military operations by entire USSR/Russian units in the N-K conflict. I moved him under "Armenia." Similar in role, I added Shamil Basayev to the Azerbaijan section. --Petercorless 12:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monte Melkonian 

message: I'd like to see some real sources confirmed the involvement of Pakistan and Israel in this conflict. Baku87 (talk) 23:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both Israel and Pakistan might have sold weaponry to Azerbaijan. So does Russian and Turkey. And Ukraine. But it shouldn't be called military aid because it ain't. Military aid is when one state transfers weaponry to another state without receiving financial reward from it. So, Israel, Pakistan, Russia and Turkey should be deleted from the Military Aid to Azerbaijan section. The only aid Turkey has provided is supply of training officers, although it can be classfied as aid to. But the rest will need to be removed. Otherwise, China, Greece, France, etc. will have to added under Armenia too. Tuscumbia (talk) 21:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan and Israel 

message: Military aid to Azerbaijan:
*Russia
*Turkey
*Chechen Republic of Ichkeria
*Afghanistan
*Israel
*Ukraine
Is it a correct information? Sources please. 109.108.250.225 (talk) 20:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources are found in the articles themselves. How many times must I repeat myself? Étienne Dolet (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Military aid
Talk:Embolotherium

message: To whoever added the section on Embolotherium brains...Embolotherium's brain size has never been measured. I've seen almost every known specimen of Embolotherium and none of them have an exposed brain case. Measuring Embolotherium's cranial capacity would involve CT scanning one of the few known skulls. However other brontothere brains tend to be small, so Embolotherium probably had a small brain, although I'm not sure if we can make a judgement about intellegence from this. The BBC animated interpretation of Embolotherium interacting with its stillborn calf, which I deleted, is speculation, but at any rate, does not suggest stupidity. Rhinos, and even primates will behave similarly with stillborn infants.
Can we remove the "Brain" section?  It sounds too much like the out-dated "they went extinct because they were peabrained ogres" kind of talk people used to say about the inferiority of prehistoric animals.--Mr Fink 15:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First if there is a reference to a scientific paper on the brain anatomy of this species then it should be included. Second, to say a species died because it is stupid is unscientific and unencyclopedic, than why do other species with smaller brains than Homo sapiens still exist. So a removal is wise and safe. Enlil Ninlil 05:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:South Crofty

message: On Requested and orphan maps someone have requested a location map for South Crofty. I brought the request up on the Graphic Lab but there is a need for someone with knowledge of the exact location of South Crofty. So, if you can help, please drop by and supply the information needed.
 / Mats Halldin (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Kmusser 02:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location map request 

message: Most of the text of this page comes from  and is probably a copyright violation.  Ideally someone with some local knowledge could rewrite it.  Kmusser 02:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation? 

message: As far as I can see, the problematic text forms the bulk of the introduction, but the remainder of the article is not (to me) derived from the text at the linked website. DuncanHill 13:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have therefore created a temporary article without the problematic text located at Talk:South Crofty/Temp. DuncanHill 13:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation 

message: While I personally love black and white photos of old industrial sites such as the ones features in this article, I feel colourised photos are probably more preferable for this encyclopaedia. --Τασουλα  (Amira) (talk) 21:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any problem with b/w photos - indeed, for some phases of the mine's history they will be the only photos available. Colour photos are also nice, but not colourised (i.e., with colour added after the fact). DuncanHill (talk) 22:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  B/w Photographs. 
Talk:Movistar

message: I DON'T LIKE MOVISTAR!  THEY ARE BANDITS!  THEY ARE SO POWERFUL, THEY REALLY MESS WITH CONSUMERS!  WATCH OUT!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.58.13.137 (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:User page design center/Help and collaboration/Trading spaces

message: I've changed the userbox image to something more revelant.--jonphamta 16:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Banner Image 

message: I wonder if we could change the project name to Pimp my Page. I think it's better because it is not the exact name of a TV show. The Gerg 01:03, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The template  was at one point named , but the name was decided to be changed in order to be unoffensive - though it may be meant in jest when referring to the show Pimp My Ride, many people may not have heard of the show, and would find it offensive.  I would assume that would go along with naming the project as such. -- Natalya 02:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Project Name 

message: That's what's written on the project page : "best viewed in Mozilla Firefox". Is this a good idea ? I thought that any web page should be designed to be best viewed by everyone no matter what bloody damned navigator they use. Comments welcome. -- DLL   .. T 08:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Cheers, [sd] 00:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  best viewed in Mozil... Firef...
Talk:Shahanshah

message: Shahanshah were also used in fermans by ottoman padishahs 
This fact should be added here with better English.
:Many Persianate societies have adopted this title, and that does not mean it is an Ottoman title. When the title of Shah, Padeshah and Shahanshah were deployed by Darius the Great in 6th centuray BCE, there were no Ottomans nor Turks! ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk)  13:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The word shahanshah was never used by Darius in the 6th century BCE. The term used was the Old Persian phrase (i.e. not one word) xšāyaθiya xšāyaθiyānām king of kings. And the comment above says only "Shahanshah were [sic] used in fermans by otoman padishahs" (my emphasis); it says nothing about shahanshah being an Ottoman term. So if shahanshah was used by Ottoman rulers as well, I don't see why that shouldn't be added to the article. Thefamouseccles 01:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shahanshah were also used in fermans by ottoman padishahs
Talk:Russian symbolism

message: I'm going to be altering capitalization of several section headings, links, and terms throughout this article to conform with the naming conventions and style for capitalization.  I'm going to edit section-by-section, so I wanted to explain here rather than putting in the links to the appropriate pages in each individual edit summary. W.stanovsky (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: While Benois lived and worked in the symbolist era, it would be difficult to call him a symbolist. He is probably better classified as a member of the World of Art (Mir iskusstva) group, along with Somov, Bakst, and others. This article mentions this group, calling it a part of the symbolist movement, but aside from working around the same time, the work of the Mir iskusstva artists is very different in form and attitude from that of "true" symbolists such as Mikhail Vrubel'. This article uses two Benois images, the illustration of Pushkin's "The Bronze Horseman" and the stage design for Petrushka. Any work of Vrubel's, on the other hand, is conspicuously absent. To avoid the risk of misrepresenting the symbolist movement, consider removing or changing these images. Pdmeyer (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Benois

message: Who is Brix Anthony Pace? I couldn't find anything about them online. 45.93.75.130 (talk) 13:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   Brix Anthony Pace
Talk:Sainik School Satara

message: I'be redirected this page to Sainik School.  Edits introduced by 203.197.87.163 on 12 March 2010 appear to be copyright violations of http://www.indiaedu.com/residential-schools/sainik-school-satara.html (as they have articles on schools that we don't it seems reasonable to suspect we copied from them rather than the otherway around).  As all edits after this are deritive work I'd normally revert back to a version prior to the introduction of copyrighted material but in this instance all previous versions say virtually nothing about the school and mainly concern the wider scheme, hence the redirect. Dpmuk (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting and copyright concerns
Talk:Tie Guard

message: I feel disloyal as a mathie for saying this, but this is pretty crufty.  It's hard to think of nominating Tie Guard for deletion when there are like 50 articles on Pokemon cards, but this should be merged into University of Waterloo Faculty of Mathematics. --Saforrest 16:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, there is a GFDLed photo of the tie (as opposed to a copyrighted promotional one) that I took available here. --Saforrest 16:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Not encyclopedic.  Please stop putting it back!  JamieJones  talk 19:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing names once again
Talk:Clive Woodward

message: According to the Chelsea FC website, Woodward is a fan of theirs.   Any suggestions of where the best place to put that would be? Crito2161 16:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got a copy of his book Winning! and it mentions Everton but not Chelsea.GordyB 12:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chelsea FC

message: Current article main text says he went to NZ in 1983, but stats box on right mentions only SA in 1980.
www.sporting-heroes.net only mentions 1980 tour.
Did he really go to NZ in 83?
Rja211077 10:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lions tours 
Wikipedia talk:Reference desk/Language/FAQs

message: looking for another word for late payment fee, and not service charge fee...any ideas
:Please post to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language instead of creating a new talk subpage. Thank you. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 17:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

message: User:Anonymous 57 recently made a couple edits that substantially (and apparently unilaterally) changed this section, changing the perspective from anti-"could care less" to pro-"could care less."  I think his reasoning is pretty weak, and that the majority of people would disagree that "could care less" is sarcasm rather than a simple error.  I am pretty sure this wasn't a bad faith edit, although his addition of "What is lost on many is that the phrase is intended sarcastically. Think of it as shorthand for "As if I could care less!" and all becomes clear, or at least, slightly less unclear (particularly to those with Asperger's Syndrome, who appear to be rife on Wikipedia—no insult intended)." makes me less certain.  Either way, I think this was an inappropriate change to make without establishing concensus, and unless anyone has a reasonable objection I'm going to revert it. -Elmer Clark 00:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are the changes in question. -Elmer Clark 00:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and reverted it.  Please discuss such substantial and potentially controversial changes here before making them. -Elmer Clark 17:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could/couldn't care less
Talk:Law firms in fiction

message: This article was broken out from List of law firms; edit history for the content of this article can be found in the edit history of that page. bd2412 T 16:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not anymore.  Some moron deleted that article.  --Nelson Ricardo 19:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: Gage Whitney Pace is included here as a firm from The West Wing and Studio 60.  It was also referenced in episode 704 of 24 as the second largest firm in DC.  I don't know if it's intended to be the same firm or not (presumably it could have offices in both DC and NY).  173.67.19.192 (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gage Whitney Pace 

message: In light of substantial additions to the article in recent weeks, it seems appropriate to rename it Law firms in fiction. The list contained within the article should be kept, in my opinion, but better referenced.  As noted above, this material was broken out of the earlier List of law firms article, and given the propensity of legal writers to mix the real and the fictional into their works, I think it should be kept just so people will be able to confirm that a listed law firm is not a real law firm. Any objection? bd2412 T 14:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: Not a huge legal drama watcher, but it seems to be there are several other television shows that aren't on the list. Anyone know what the legal firms were called in these?
* Ed (TV series)
* Family Law (TV series)
* Judd for the Defense
* Just Legal
* The Lawyers
* Perry Mason (TV series)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rvolz (talk • contribs) 17:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Additions
Talk:George Martin Instrumentally Salutes "The Beatle Girls"

message: "Got To Get You Into My Life" was about dope. --andreasegde 17:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Girl song

message: I believe this page should be called The Beatle Girls with the first line written this way : 
George Martin Instrumentally Salutes "The Beatle Girls" is an album by....
My two cents ! JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 14:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of this page
Category talk:Guitars

message: This needs major reworking. Anyone have any ideas? --Amazzing5 16:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? I like it the way it is now. --GreyCat 07:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Hmm? What do you mean? "Categories" aren't protected, anyone can change them. --GreyCat 06:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help!
Talk:Timber rafting

message: Dead link removed: *International Timber Floating Association ()--Mereda 16:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Does any one have any clue what "carry-logs" are?  See this contemporary description of timber rafting s:Early Settlers Along the Mississippi.--BirgitteSB 07:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carry-logs? 

message: Que significa 201.227.197.22 (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maderada
Talk:Cheri Dennis

message: Confusing language re where she grew up. Did she grow up in housing projects in the city of Cleveland? In projects in Shaker Heights??? Did she start out in Cleveland projects and then grow up in Shaker?
Tracymmo (talk) 05:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio section 
Talk:Mega Man III (Game Boy)

message: this page should include whether the last 4 bosses are fought after fighting through a stage or immediately upon entering their teleporter.  Mega man gb 2 had the former, megaman gb 1 had the latter. Will add the info when I find out for myself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.43.61 (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled