Talk:Nadia Yassir

message: Was this in some promotional material?  It's not mentioned in the first 4(.25) episodes of the season.  --David Bixenspan 19:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Natalie" 

message: This article needs to be fixed up. It is written in incorrect tense and it largely based of assumptions of her character pre-season. Neeknitsuj 08:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed 

message: Nadia is a fictional character. There can't be any free image for a fictional character. mirageinred 23:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the image deleted? 

message: Marisol Nichols has said that Yassir is a Pakistani American. As far as I know, Pakistanis are not Arabs, but one of the categories say fictional Arabs. mirageinred 00:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NO, Pakistani are not just Arab ancestry.Pakistan is having four major ethonic groups Sindhi, Balouch,Pashuto,Punjabi they all have own back ground and ancestry.one thing more Pakistan is in South Asia not in Middle east.Khalidkhoso 04:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are Pakistanis Arabs? 

message: Merge. The character has appeared in only one season of the show, the page seem to contain a lot of cruft and plot synopsis of the character. The character is also talked about as if she is a real character and the article does not assert her notability to justify the article remaining a separate article.--Lucy-marie 17:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should wait until season 7. If she doesn't come back by then, the article definitely should be merged. mirageinred 01:28, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not an unreasonable suggestion I suppose. asyndeton 19:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This editor has made only edits to 3 "merge" discussions; a single-purpose account participating only in editing discussions is a hallmarket of sockpuppetry. --Lquilter (talk) 19:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree on the 'real character' just meaning it needs to be cleaned up but the plot summary is something that would be very difficult, approaching impossible, to resolve for a character such as Nadia and would be a valid reason for merging per WP:NOT#PLOT. asyndeton 21:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: This character got a person nominated for an ALMA Award. Unquestionably that is notable.  As I don't know how to do the markup, someone else with knowledge can do it for me.--Lan Di (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Add that fact in, and I'll do the citation. миражinred  (speak, my child...) 04:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Looks like somebody did it before I did :) Now the question is, does that cover notability? No one else, except maybe Kiefer got a nomination for season 6.--Lan Di (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Her nomination certainly supports the notion that her character is notable enough to have an article of its own. However, I think this can be further solidified if the character makes more appearances in 24 in the future. миражinred  (speak, my child...) 05:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually few if any other actors for Season 6 were nominated much less won anything.  There are a few minor categories that were nominated such as for stunts, but the actors got snubbed. --MiB-24 (talk) 18:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree, but also there are probably thousands of different characters and actors/actresses that could have been nominated, but she got into the top 3, which is unusual for a character of that stature to even get nominated. It was nominated for Marisol Nichols for the portrayal of the character. The fact that the character existed is a factor of nominating actresses.--Lan Di (talk) 03:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your argument, but as a stand alone as the only notabiltiy it is not enough, combined with other independent sources, then notability could be established.--Lucy-marie (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I second your view. The nomination certainly helps but I'm not sure if it is enough to make the article stand on its own. миражinred  (speak, my child...) 20:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I never intended it to be stand alone, but as I have a course load to deal with in college, I have to take care of that also. So I don't have a lot of time, and I am working on getting time, as I have a course on video, and doing research on video includes critiquing 24 characters, which I picked, so I am doing research on them.--Lan Di (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I think there are definitely more secondary sources now. миражinred (سَراب)  (speak, my child...) 03:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also going to add an image for the character, would you mind checking that my reasoing is OK? Steve Crossin (talk) 03:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, go ahead. миражinred (سَراب)  (speak, my child...) 03:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: *As you may notice, this article is being worked on again. Citations, and references, to demonstrate real world notability, are being searched for. Please do not merge or delete this article while it is under construction. Steve Crossin (talk) 03:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there are definitely more secondary sources now. миражinred (سَراب)  (speak, my child...) 03:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also going to add an image for the character, would you mind checking that my reasoing is OK? Steve Crossin (talk) 03:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, go ahead. миражinred (سَراب)  (speak, my child...) 03:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Work in progress on article

message: *Well, even though there is an injunction still in effect, I think that the article has now been improved extensively, and real-world notability has definetly been established, that we should get an updated opinion on whether this article should be merged. However, the merge tag cannot be removed/article merged, until the injunction is lifted.
:*Keep- as the article has been improved extensively, and real world notability has been established, it most surely meets the guidelines requirements of WP:FICT, therefore deserving its own article. Steve Crossin (talk) 02:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal-Update

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nadia Yassir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080312030858/http://www.marisol-nichols.com/interests_questions.html to http://www.marisol-nichols.com/interests_questions.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.latina.com/latina/entertainment/entertainment.jsp?genre=tv&article=marisolnichols
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080131164333/http://media.www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2007/01/31/News/Popular.Show.negative.Stereotypes-2687807.shtml to http://media.www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2007/01/31/News/Popular.Show.negative.Stereotypes-2687807.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)