Talk:Crusade (TV series)

message: Where was the series filmed? jdobbin 05:48, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the series was filmed at the same studios that Babylon 5 had been filmed at? Can anyone confirm/deny? -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 14:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was quite definitely filmed at the old B5 stages in LA... TheRealFennShysa 04:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the information on the order is wrong -- it seems the two different orders are confused, with the airing order given as the preferred one and vice versa. Not only does "War Zone" pick up straight from "A Call To Arms" and introduces all the characters, many other episodes have broken references if watched in the so-called preferred order.
Additionally the linked page http://midwinter.com/lurk/countries/us/eplist.html#crusade shows the airing dates in the order it is listed as preferred here.
Knochenmann 20:27, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And just to add to it all - in what order do the scripts go in? LamontCranston 08:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

text: But it's impossible for "Ruling from the Tomb" to come after "Each Night I Dream of Home". In "Ruling from the Tomb", Lochley and Gideon explicitly state that they are meeting for the first time ever. In "Each Night I Dream of Home", they explicitly state that they already know each other (in the last item under "Continuity problems" on the main page, someone explained that this dialogue was inserted into "Each Night I Dream of Home" as a voiceover, because "Each Night I Dream of Home" was originally going to be Lochley's first Crusade episode, until "Ruling from the Tomb" was made). So I'm afraid you ordered those episodes wrongly from a causal standpoint. I haven't read the Official Babylon 5 Magazine, but since "Ruling from the Tomb" was listed third under chronological order when I first saw this page a few years ago, I thought/hoped that order was given in the magazine and that it had been changed in Across Time and Space, which I own and know lists "Ruling from the Tomb" tenth. Did it change from the magazine to the book? -- Noneofyourbusiness (talk) 00:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode order 

message: All of the episodes of this series fail the notability guidelines for television episodes. The way for these articles to be improved is through the inclusion of real-world information from reliable sources to assert notability. That is unlikely to happen, and these only have certain bad aspects (though all may not apply) like containing overly long or one sentence plot summaries, trivia, and quotes. Per that, they need to be a small part of this list. 
If there are no objections, these will be redirected soon. Otherwise, discussion will take place here. Please remember that this is not a vote. If you like the information, that's fine and dandy, but your opinion doesn't really count towards anything. The only opinions that do count are ones that that lean towards the inclusion of real world information. TTN 20:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd also prefer to see the articles brought up to standards instead of merged, but if they must be merged, it may make more sense to do so at a List of Crusade episodes, or something to that effect. This article is already long enough without trying to fit episode information into it. - EurekaLott 06:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So... they've just been deleted. No merger at all. Not quite what the above really suggests is it? Agree with above create List of Crusade Episodes and resurrect some of the information from the deleted articles. Tom walker 20:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free. You have had plenty of time to do so. TTN 20:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was waiting for a final agreement. Now done, List of Crusade episodes. Tom walker 22:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode notability

message: :Image:Crusade season 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Crusade season 1.jpg

message: If Each Night I Dream of Home "was originally to have introduced Lochley; a line of voice-over dialogue establishes that they had previously me", then why is it that Ruling from the Tomb has them introducing each other? I mean if the release order is problematic because it has broken references, than this intended order also has broken references. The problem is: I know this by watching the show, wich is original research, and there is no place on Earth where this is stated. 81.182.237.63 (talk) 01:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't get it 

message: The section about continuity problems is about the original air sequence in 1999 as stated in the article. Now in that sequence, the crew starts of with black uniforms and after 8 Episodes switches to the grey uniforms and wears them to the remaining episodes. So in that respect, there isn't a continuity problem and the article was simply wrong as it was written. 91.19.232.82 (talk) 18:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: When i said discuss i meant reach a consesus. It is noted across the JMS  usenet posts, his comments on the DVD release and most recently in the Crusade: What The Hell Happened book series. The uniforms are a continuity issue especially looking at the nanovirus shield which was 'discovered' in episode ten (grey uniforms) but had already been used in episode 5 (black uniform). For more information see the Babaylon 5 Wiki page on the subjecthere. Stop continually deleting the information simply because you do not agree. Wikipedia is about co-operation and consensus. Pat (talk) 11:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Pat on all counts, especially removal of content without consensus. The uniforms become even more of a continuity issue when you consider that they were going to go back to the black ones in episode 14. Tom walker (talk) 14:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  As a result of TNT showing the episodes out of their intended sequence, there are several continuity problems... - this statement means, that the article refers to continuity problems, regarding the sequence in which the Episodes were first shown, not regarding the production order or the creators preferred order. Yes there was the continuity problem with the nanovirus-shield, yes, Max Eilerson is bothered by the death of a crewman in "Appearances" but not anymore in the very next episode "Racing the Night". But when the uniforms were introduced in Episode 8 (of the original TNT broadcast sequence), they have not already been worn by the crew several episodes earlier! Absolutely not. Yes, they have been worn by them in the Production Cronology or the revised broadcast sequence, but not in the original TNT sequence, which started off with 8 Black Uniform Episodes, then came the uniform swap in "appearances" and then the 5 gray uniform episodes were shown. So, as it is written now, the article is false. It should either be removed (which I did and, admitted, maybe that was inapropriate) or it should be rephrased. 91.19.194.243 (talk) 12:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have rephrased it. Should be ok now. 91.19.194.243 (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniforms are not Continuity Problem 

message: Earth is attacked by aliens with weapons of mass destruction, which will lead all lifeforms to extinction in a matter of years. However, humans send their best prototype ship, named after a powerful symbol from the past, armed with a strong deflecting shield, warping system and a powerful cannon whose fire temporarily disabled the ship, into a faraway and uncertain expedition to retrieve a miraculous cure to save all life from Earth.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gros, QuiWe P. Aide (talk • contribs) 19:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration from Space Battleship Yamato