lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Port of Dover

message: Article needs a picture -- Antriver 21:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This appears to be disaster management related to the Port of Dover; Operation Stack.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 14:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , with no sudden accident, natural catastrophe, or anything else that caused great damage or loss of life, I find it hard to consider this freight backlog, caused by the closure of French ports, as a disaster. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I shall not object; I thought disaster management was concerned with planning so that some disasters do not happen. Obviously the present state of the cross Channel freight services has not become a disaster. Unfortunately once it occurs it stays around for a long time. Brexit has a lot of problems. --Johnsoniensis (talk) 17:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , this wasn't a disaster though, just congestion caused by France being closed. And this was not related to Brexit, it was the reaction of French to the level of the new Covid variant in the UK. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a sensible way of looking at it but it seems to me that Operation Stack is resorted to when a real disaster like a fire or flood in the Channel Tunnel arises. If a military force attacked a port that would also be a disaster of national significance. (I am not a member of these projects but any better-informed editor is free to revise the WikiProjects attached to an article.)-- --Johnsoniensis (talk) 22:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , it's there to accommodate all the trucks that accumulate if the crossing(s) are blocked for any reason. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Operation Stack
Talk:Monopod (creature)

message: The articles basically cover the same thing, so why not consolidate two small articles into one through and good quality one? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of Duffer here

message: Is the section Facts really necessary? Francisco Valverde (talk) 20:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Fact 
Template talk:WikiProject Sociology

message: I don't think :Image:PeaceSymbol.gif is a good logo; pacifism/anarchism don't represent sociology, and actually they seem in opposition to the conflict theory :) I would stronly recommend selecting some other symbol; perhaps the same one as we use in , i.e. :Image:Vista-Login Manager2.png?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus  talk  15:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, of course. I was mostly concerned about getting the thing up and running. I'm not that enamoured with imagry. Form follows function in my book. I was astounded by how quickly you got articles into the assessment stream. Very encouraging. •  Charley Quinton  talk  00:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Black July/Archive 1

message: I have reverted the total edits made by user user 68.118.189.184 as the article was totally changed. As far as I have read of the event it was a massive attack on civilian tamils in the south by sinhalese mobs after the LTTE attack on the army patrol in Jaffna. The edits were obviously made to make it look as both parties were equal - that is sinhalese were as much attacked by tamils. I can not find any credible evidence for this, and so I consider it POV, or maybe more correctly propaganda. Ulflarsen 08:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted POV 

message: I don't think the link "Black July 2006" is credible so I'm removing it.--snowolfd4 10:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the date of your edit very interesting RaveenS 12:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links
Talk:FLORA ACT

message: Is this actually an act, or is it just something a pressure group wants to happen? DJ Clayworth 15:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered my own question. It's just something a pressure group wants to make happen. Until it gets proposed as an actual act it can just be a redirect. DJ Clayworth 15:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Paola

message: Why don't we have an article on Paola, Italy?  Its a city big enough to be included on my Eurorail map, meaning its likely within the tp few hundred tourist destinations in Europe (or at least a place where tourists must change trains).  Is there another spelling?  81.220.55.91 15:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alfred Weber

message: It would help to explain terms like PC (perfect competion?) and MDC (more developed country?)69.19.14.18 (talk) 01:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please explain 

message: The works of Max Weber have been appended to the end of this article, in a box,  as if they are the works of Alfred Weber. ??? I don't understand why they are included. It causes confusion on the part of the reader.      
DlronW (talk) 11:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   works of Max Weber 

message: Two questions, from the section on least cost theory: Should Luc-Normand Tellier's 1985 work really be part of the Alfred Weber article? And if the answer is yes, then IMO it's important to explain exactly why attraction and repulsion are relevant to industries' choices of location. People who don't understand industry very well are the ones most likely to be reading this section. TooManyFingers (talk) 15:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attraction and repulsion: why include? 

message: Both are logical and readable so I don't care. But it would be better within this article to settle on one or the other. TooManyFingers (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling: deagglomeration or deglomeration? 

message: Weber's name has been attached to the theoretical material being discussed here, which is only right. But this article is about him specifically - his biography - and not about his theories in general. It seems to me that in a biographical article, any detailed discussions of a person's work should be restricted to their own version of that work, presented in the same way they themselves presented it (perhaps simplified but not updated), and ignoring newer developments (giving a mention that such developments exist, but no more). 
I can't tell whether this is the case for this article, because it doesn't say which page of Weber's publications these ideas are coming from. TooManyFingers (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the way Weber described it?
Talk:The Chronicles of Narnia (TV series)

message: Somebody should get on that... Bifgis 22:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finish the plot summaries... 

message: I put on the episode numbers on The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe section. Will someone please extend the plot summaries of the other serials so I can finish that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanmalik01 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode numbers 

message: Most of this article is devoted to summarising the plot which seems rather unnecessary as the adaptation was very faithful to the books.
There is a short section on awards which is more to the point in terms of what makes this series notable but I think there should be more on critical reception and on the effects and costumes, which though they may seem hokey in hindsight, seemed quite special at the time. I wonder if it would be possible to find viewing figures? I believe it was a big ratings success.
79.68.19.117 (talk) 20:10, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus and Notability 

message: Mr Tumnus only appeared in The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, and Dr Cornelius solely appeared in Prince Caspian, but both of these characters were credited as appearing in the Silver Chair. Why is this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.96.42 (talk) 20:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Tumnus and Dr Cornelius credited in the Silver Chair
Talk:Stop Snitchin, Stop Lyin

message: Does anyone know where The Game got the "Baby this is real shit, my record sell slow, Imma show you my dick (repeats 7x)" part that 50 Cent is saying, from the song "120 Bars"? --- Efil4tselaer 14:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 120 Bars
Talk:McDonnell F3H Demon

message: Need a more appropriate  comparison - this was only transonic while the century series were all supersonic in level flight. - Leonard G. 15:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not comperable to F100

message: This article states: "The supersonic USAF F-101 Voodoo also retained much of the Demon's layout." Really? The F-101 was derived from the XF-88 (which truly looks like an anemic one-oh-wonder, something the Demon doesn't much even resemble) which first flew in 1948 (development beginning in 1946). Since development work on the Demon didn't begin until 1949 according to this fine article, it would have been a neat trick for the Voodoo to retain much of the layout of a design concept that succeded it. Sounds like original research, i.e., being polite for someone whose head is where the sun don't shine, to this long suffering Wiki reader. However, it is in keeping with the general scholarship one finds on Wiki (where it seems every aviation article is written or commandeered by folks who have little knowledge or understanding of American aviation) as well as a penchant for using spellings like programme, etc. if you get my drift.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.141 (talk) 19:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: More Wacky Wiki Facts

message: Is there a need for the citation bombing tags on this article? Was there an issue with unsourced or unreferenced material? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits
Talk:Underland (Narnia)

message: This article must be improved in citations and references. I was the person who started this article but I couldn't give proper citations and references as I have an ebook of the Chronicles Of Narnia and the page no.s are not certain. Please help improve the article by giving appropriate publication years and the page numbers. If you have any sources other than the Silver Chair by C S Lewis, you are most welcome to give the references with appropriate page no.s and publication dates.Srinivas G Phani (talk) 07:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations And References 

message: Article largely rewritten, June, 2009.  Elphion (talk) 16:11, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting
Talk:Neoevolutionism

message: I've noticed that much of the opposition to the doctrine of evolution is not so much based on a dislike of ancient primates and dinosaurs, but rather that it follows an objection to the philosophical postulates that everything evolves, a phrase that is in some ways similar to all is relative when applied to the whole of human society. When critics speak of evolutionism, it is quite likely that they are refering to neoevolutionism, and not necessarily evolution itself. This is in some ways understandable because many socio-cultural movements that have functionally integrated neoevolutionism have been highly controversial, such as social darwinism, colonialism, eugenics, birth control, population control and transhumanism. ADM (talk) 13:34, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Opposition to evolution

message: Shouldn't there be a section on the proposed stages of Band, tribe, chiefdom, state, empire? 128.148.231.12 (talk) 15:24, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because that's unilinear evolution, not neo-evolutionism. 69.157.78.84 (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

text: kkklklkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 201.22.234.193 (talk) 23:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band, tribe, chiefdom, state, empire
Talk:Roosevelt Park (Edison, New Jersey)

message: This park was supposedly built in 1917, which is two years before Theodore Roosevelt died. Can someone confirm when the park was established, what it was initially called, if/when the park was named for TR and if/when that dedication was made? Also, Edison was called Raritan Township until the 1950s; was the park identified in the earliest days as being in Raritan Twp? I've also seen Menlo Park and Metuchen. I also noticed a reference to the park suggesting that it belonged to Roosevelt Hospital. Perhaps someone from the Edison-Metuchen Historical Society can add to this article or provide some details here for me to incorporate? Thanks. Pnoble805 (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Roosevelt?
Talk:Wood between the Worlds

message: I propose we move this page to Wood between the Worlds. While the initial 'the' should be left out, saying just "Wood between Worlds" sounds like broken English and it is never presented as such in canon or elsewhere. Thoughts? --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This makes sense to me. LloydSommerer 17:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Moved. —wwoods 18:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: Could  the cover of The Magician's Nephew featuring a scene taking place in the Wood be used as a picture?
--Romulus 02:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I would say so. Just be sure to provide a fair use rationale. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I could only find a picture of that particular cover here and it doesn't seem to be of high enough quality. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Romuluscrohns (talk • contribs) 00:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind; that's a picture of the garden in Magician's nephew.--Romulus 01:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: It seems that there are many parallels between the Wood Between the Worlds (that connects all worlds) and Aslan's Country (Which is between all worlds). Could these be one and the same or just a coincidence? --Alreajk (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aslan's Country 

message: The only reference that needs to be made is to the "Magician's Nephew", and I'd argue it's so obvious that it doesn't need to be made.  
Also, the link to "linking rooms" goes nowhere.  I found more information at http://www.indopedia.org/Linking_room.html  HTH,
-- TimNelson (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Six years later "linking-room" seems to be our neologism. Anyway, it is not appropriate as a display name (linkname) for wikilink to our article Portals in fiction --as it has been. I rewrote the lead with "portal" the linkname and with the ponds/pools in the forest/wood as the portals. --P64 (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other linking rooms, and references 

message: Note that in the article it says that Jadis was included in those who became slothful there. However, she was actually affected differently than everyone else—it was as if she were dying or something; she didn't just forget stuff and go to sleep or whatever like the others; she was in agony. Perhaps this was because it was Aslan's domain (although it never says this is the reason to my knowledge). 76.27.43.136 (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jadis in the Wood between the Worlds 

message: The Wood between the Worlds also figures prominently in the Chrestomanci novels by Diana Wynne Jones, particularly "Charmed Life" and "The Lives of Christopher Chant."2600:8803:B402:B700:985F:5B9D:74F8:7301 (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Wood between the Worlds in Diana Wynne Jones
Talk:Antinaturalism

message: The philosophy section, "nothing in nature is either good or bad" is totally uncited and thus totally dubious. I'm taking it out for now. The rest of this doesn't seem to encompass the different things that the word "antinaturalism" has been used to mean, but here is something which may be used as a citation for the animal-rights stuff. — coelacan talk — 02:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: notes
Talk:Robert Krebs

message: I just removed the following from the very end of the article page:
 
Was that supposed to be in the references?  I know it's a book (since I sold a few copies when I worked in a model train shop a while ago); I don't have a copy myself, but it looks like it could be a citation for the newly added paragraph. Slambo (Speak) 14:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a reference? 

message: Riding the Rails: Inside the Business of America's Railroads is Robert Krebs' book. It was published by Indiana University Press in 2018. The ISBN for the hardcover edition is 978-0-253-03186-0. Krebs acknowledges that journalist and railroad author Fred Frailey helped him put this book together. And that his daughter was the primary editor. Suffice to say that there is biographical information in this book. --SSW9389 (talk) 16:01, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riding the Rails 
Talk:La Jornada

message: I have deleted the section about antisemitism because it provides an image of the paper that is not accurate........ it as an op-ed not an editorial, and the fact that it had harsh critiques against mossad does not imply antisemitism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.156.173 (talk) 02:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm readding this section, it is sourced, it says that it is against it's editorialists, and I would say it presents an accurate depiction of the paper, if you've ever read it. -Solid Reign (talk) 12:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read the paper and it is clear that an editorialist does not represent the paper. I think this should be removed. Teh paper has a few contributors that are jewish themselves.  I will go ahead and delete this and will wait for furhter discussion on the topic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy Rosenthal (talk • contribs) 22:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Antisemitism
Talk:CKTV-DT

message: We can't put a cable channel since its not the same depending on the service provider that you have in the region (for example, the channel is located on channel 3 with Cogeco).
:Per the television stations project, we list the cable channel in the primary market. Cable channels in outlying markets are unnecessary. Bearcat (talk) 21:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tuff E Nuff

message: Hey, I just wanted to know, does anybody know japanese here, The original game has dialog, but I can't understand it.
Aboriginal7 15:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about Dialog

message: I've noticed there's nothing about the fact the Japanese box art is actually licensed from a magazine cover of Computer and Video Games Magazine.  They previewed the game with a custom cover and Jaleco liked it so much, they asked for a copy.--Guru Larry (talk) 02:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: CVG Cover
Talk:Ostraciidae

message: On the island of Antigua these boxfish are referred to as 'shellfish' and they are an eatabale delicacy. They are prepared by slicing the underbelly of the fish and scooping out the guts. Then the belly is stuffed with stuffing (like stove top stuffing, the same way you would stuff a turkey) and spices and butter. The most popular method of cooking it is on the grill but it can also be baked. When it is finished, you tap the hard outer shell & peel it away (the same way you would peel a hard boiled egg), leaving just the tender fish and the stuffing. The fish meat is tender and has a texture like a mix between chicken and fish. The dish is called 'Stuffed Shellfish'.Jackster69 (talk) 15:32, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edibility

message: "Cowfish" apparently is also another name for Common galaxias fish. -- œ™ 07:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cowfish

message: Just mentioning: the Scales article says that "boxfish" (links here) have bony plates consisting of modified skin, not true scales, making up their carapace. This article disagrees.
I'm no ichthyologist and don't have an opinion.
IAmNitpicking (talk) 15:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scales or bony plates?
Talk:Chinaman-leatherjacket

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 08:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Clown toado

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 08:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Contusus

message: Someone please verify this, which I removed:  "it is responsible for over 100 deaths daily."  Highly unlikely I would say.  36,500 people a year dying from pufferfish? I don't think so.  Here's a story about 15 cases in the last 3 years.  Don't you think they would mention the other 109,485 that would have had to have died for this to be true?  Bruxism (talk) 10:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  False claim?
Talk:Molidae

message: Are they good to eat?  Where found?  Behaviour?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.52.106 (talk) 12:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually now I see that most of my questions are answered on a derivative article.  This should be made clearer for searchers.  Also, for whatever it's worth, the articles and content at the project sunfish (on the internet) are superior to this assembled article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.4.244 (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: Wouldn't it be ocean sunfish instead of sunfishes  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.104.12.2 (talk) 21:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Please see Fish#Fish or fishes. 212.10.95.14 (talk) 21:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_sunfish
I'd do it myself but I don't know how.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.89.192.122 (talk) 01:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Ocean Sunfish 

message: The sunfish is also the subject of the "sunfish rant" which may be found online  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.223.199.127 (talk) 00:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunfish rant