lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gyu-Kaku

message: Gyu-Kaku, is Korean-Japanese resturant chain. The resturant serve Korean foods like Korean BBQ, Bibimbap, Kimchee. The food is Korean whereas the name is Japanese. I would not be surprised if the Gyu-Kaku resturant chain owner is Korean-Japanese alias using ( Japanese names)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostonjj (talk • contribs) 10:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not true, Gyu-kaku is a Japanese restaurant from Japan that serves Japanese cuisine from Korean influences. The menu does contain korean items appropriated by a japanese perspective as ADDITONS but they aren't staples of the cuisine.  The staples of the cuisine as the restaurant's name states is Beef - especially tongue, while korean bbq emphasizes pork. Furthermore, traditionally tare is still used, korean bbq popularized the grill instead of the traditional stew. There is an intermixing of cultures with cuisine in all of this that contextualizes a lot of the changes made in both styles of bbq -- Occupied korea, koreans in japan etc affect this. Regardless, this debate should be on the "yakiniku" page, not necessarily on this specific restaurant's page. Polkunus (talk) 07:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I can't help but notice that a Wikipedian has inserted links to articles clearly showing a POV asserting that the food of Gyu-Kaku's is specifically Korean and implying an underlying subtext of misappropriation of the food as Japanese. Based on my experiences at Korean restaurants and at Gyu-Kaku, I'd have to say there's some truth to the culinary crossover but there seems to be something odd about how this is asserted. Maybe something less accusatory sounding?
--72.87.131.203 (talk) 23:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Kortoso  (talk) 21:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV bias in references from Korean newspaper "The Chosun Ilbo" 

message: Headquarters: Tokyo 
Discussion on whether yakiniku is Japanese or Korean: 
:Kortoso  (talk) 21:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese or Korean
Talk:Ito En

message: This completely lacks global POV. Currently this is not an article by about the company Ito En- intead it is just some PR blurb about the US ventures of the company. one would hope that the PR people can do better and provide information about the whole company. Mtl1969 (talk) 15:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global POV
Talk:University of Neuchâtel

message: The logo of the university has changed and is now this one: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universit%C3%A9_de_Neuch%C3%A2tel#/media/Fichier:Unine_logo.png
However, I can't find how to replace it, if someone can do it I will be grateful! Biodivguy (talk) 15:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Morinaga & Company

message: needs its own article.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:37, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ottotto 
Talk:Underwater ice hockey

message: so do they use SCUBA gear or are there holes in the ice to breath from?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.7.17.3 (talk) 19:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the article, they do not, they breathe from holes. -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 07:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: We can verify that two events have been held (2007 and 2013), but it seems like this is more of a stunt than a legitimate sport?  Are there leagues, national organizations, anything?  Is there any evidence that this "sport" has been played by anyone since 2013? 162 etc. (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, went bold and merged the article.  I'm just not convinced of the notability.  Discussion welcome. 162 etc. (talk) 19:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , You claim to have merged this article, so where did you merge it to? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 03:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reduced the article to a mention at Hockey#Other forms of hockey.  The previous article , while much longer, was based mostly on primary sources authored by Christian Redl. Per my earlier comment, it appears that while some events have been held, I'd categorize them as an exhibition or stunt, rather than a sport. 162 etc. (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , so not actually a merge at all. More of an untagged and undiscussed deletion and redirect of a fairly substantial article, reported as a merge and redirect. While I have no particular opinion or interest in the topic itself or its notability, and have not done WP:BEFORE, which I hope you have, I think this covert method of deletion goes against the generally accepted guidelines, even if that was not the intention. If you disagree, please explain why, otherwise I suggest you revert and if you feel it necessary, nominate for deletion, and let it go through the proper process. In my opinion it does not qualify for speedy deletion, and after this would also not qualify for WP:PROD, even if it did before, which I have not checked. Please ping with reply. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 06:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is what happened. Per WP:BRD, feel free to revert. 162 etc. (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted as inappropriate blank and redirect. No merge was involved. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 01:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this actually a thing?
Talk:Machiguenga

message: They also eat guinea pig, correct? Badagnani (talk) 06:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Guinea pig]] 
Talk:2006 San Francisco Giants season

message: It is not necessary to delete or merge this article.  I will be working on it. jj137Talk 1:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion not necessary 

message: The game log is not yet completed, so the header will appear as if it is over the "2006 MLB season by team" template for now. jj137Talk 2:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a blank game log to the page, and I will eventually be filling it in.  Anybody can help to fill it in, by the way. jj137Talk 2:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game log 

message: Don't worry about the references. I will add them. Feel free to leave me a comment on my talk page to remind me! :) jj137Talk 22:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I put that the Giants have been in the National League West since 1969 when there became divisions. Please correct me if I am wrong. jj137Talk 22:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  National League West division date 
Talk:Trading system

message: This page just repeats some concepts discussed at algorithmic trading without adding anything.  The reference actually doesn't refer to trading systems (I'm very familiar with the book).  There are no reliable sources here.  It's just a big nothing.  I'll merge a few words from here to algo trading in a few days.  Smallbones (talk) 01:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Craig's Brother

message: This article needs to be fixed.
:I will work on it and see  what I can do. Well also it is a start and when other come on to this page they can add. Furthermore, this cite is informative and has good info it shouldn't be deleted.Corpus1 (talk) 01:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed

message: Sorry about that lack of sources for all this, most is retold from discussions with Ted and Heath on the old messageboard and that interview I linked to repeats most of these things. Also, a lot comes from the FAQ they had up on the messageboard. I made a copy before the board went down so here's the entire thing (the note on the current lineup must've been edited in much later);
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaysow (talk • contribs) 12:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: FAQ
Talk:Harbour defence motor launch

message: I'm worried about the word "adapted" in front of the "Medusa" by Mike Boyce, does this indicate that parts of this text have been copied from that source?Koonan the almost civilised 02:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure now that there has been extensive copyright vio in this article, the Combinedops site has a section the exact clone of the opening section of this one. I'm pretty sure both this article and combinedops copied from Mike Boyce's book, though I don't have a copy of the book to verify this. What remains to be done now is to rewrite this article, to remove any copyright vio. Koonan the almost civilised 07:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright vio? 

message: Can somone with more expertise than me, fix the second picture ? (At the moment all you can see is '300px' in red). Thanks in advance. RASAM (talk) 16:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second picture 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*oppose all  Yes, yet again, just like all the others. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:23, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Scenic Daylight

message: Prior to my edit today, the lede read 
: The Scenic Daylight was a daytime express train in New Zealand, introduced in 1963. This reference is incorrect. The train was introduced in 1960, and last ran in January 1972.
The edit was made by a non-logged in user (logged IP address) with no citation for the 1960 date. I'd think the "This reference is incorrect" text would belong on the talk page. Rather than revert, I'd edited to show both options, with a few "citation needed" tags. 
I wasn't able to find any sources that corroborate the 1960 opening date. This source in the fourth bullet of its "A brief history ..." section, but the site appears to be self-published. 
I'd appreciate if some more experienced editors could help with suggestions to clean up this article. Thanks!
Msramming (talk) 23:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Luckily it's my lunchbreak! And it looks like this article needs a serious amount of work done on it... --LJ Holden 23:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Righto, it appears that the service was actually called the Scenic Daylight from 1960, but still steam-hauled until 1963. Makes sense now.--LJ Holden 23:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious - opening date
Talk:Triticeae glutens

message: The article Triticeae glutens has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:This article has been marked as overly technical for 6 years. In attempting to reduce the technical language it became clear that the excessive technical details constitute the bulk of the contents, and indeed all of the contents not adequately covered elsewhere. I would propose that it be merged into Gluten, but that article has been a featured article, and I don't think anything here is missing from that article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Meaigs (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Triticeae glutens]]
Template talk:Australian federal divisions of New South Wales

message: Does anyone have any objection to changing this and the other federal division templates to look like the British ones, eg. here? Frickeg 05:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seven years later... I think the british style is better, so go ahead! JamesDouch (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, I'm not even sure I agree with seven-years-ago me anymore. But it might be worth a sandbox. Frickeg (talk) 01:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Proper subsections to divide current and abolished electorates could at least be made. JamesDouch (talk) 06:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency with British templates
Talk:Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge (Connecticut)

message: The Connecticut Department of Transportation's New Haven Harbor Corridor Reconstruction Program website has several renditions of what the new Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge will look like when it is finished.  Here is the the URL to one of these renditions:    67.169.155.123 23:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rendition of New Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge

message: Trust me, no one wants an image of the current bridge.  - Denimadept (talk) 07:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sigh, nevermind.  I'll see if I can do this tomorrow (Sunday). - Denimadept (talk) 07:28, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added.  Not the best possible, perhaps, but this bridge isn't exactly picturesque. - Denimadept (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reqphoto comment 

message: I've sent a note requesting information on the new bridge.  Will post when/if I get anything. - Denimadept (talk) 21:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New bridge stats requested 

message: I recommend splitting this article into an article for the old bridge, and one for the new bridge.  I've done similar for Berkley–Dighton Bridge, where the previous bridge is Berkley–Dighton Bridge (1896).  We could do one here as Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge (Connecticut) (1958). - Denimadept (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Recommend split
Category talk:Anglican archbishops in Canada

message: Seems to me this category, which I got to while trying to look up diocesse in British Columbia in relation to another article or discussion (which I've since lost track of...) and it struck me that the article this was on - the BC & Yukon - is not about an archbishop but about an archbishopric.  An archbishop is a person, but all these are institution articles; I don't know enough about ecclesiastical structures to even begin suggesting better categories, but "Archbishopric" seems obvious unless that has a different meaning form the Ecclesiastical Province; in fact I can see that it does - the Archbishopric is the position, the Province is the territory governred by the position.....anyway by its title this category should contain biographies and maybe descriptions of the offices; not of the institution/organization.  Just a quibble, but as with all quibbles in wiki an important one in the sticky-picky kind of way that's often so necessary....Skookum1 (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Archbishopric makes sense if an ecclesiastical province has a fixed See.  In England, it is reasonable to speak of Canterbury as an archbishopric, since it has a See city with an archiepisocpal cathedra.  In the Canadian province of the Anglican Communion, this does not pertain.  Metropolitans are elected at synods of the ecclesiastical province from among the bishops of that province; and there is no separate separate See city.  Hence, in the Ecclesiastical Province of British Columbia and the Yukon, for example, the Metropolitan is currently the Archbishop of Yukon, who succeeded the Archbishop of Kootenay, who succeeded the Archbishop of New Westminster.  These archbishop had their own diocesan Sees that were not, per se, archbishoprics.  At least, that's my understanding.  fishhead64 (talk) 02:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Anglican archbishoprics in Canada"
Talk:Fáry's theorem

message: A simpler argument is the following: if the graph has $n$ vertices, draw it in $R^{n}$ using the points of the usual basis $e_1,\\dots,e_n$ and stright segments where needed. Now show that you can project orthogonally down to a subspace of dimension $n-1$ preserving the property that the edges are disjpoint. For this,it is enough to see that there is a direction in $R^n$ such that no line with that direction intersects two of the segments are interior points (and you can get such a direction using Baire's theorem saying that $R^n$ is of the first category as a topological space). Now you have a rectilinear embedding in $R^{n-1}$. As long as you are not on a plane, you can keep doing this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.92.22.152 (talk) 21:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Where are you using the assumption that the graph is planar? It is certainly the case that you can make mistakes in projecting one dimension at a time; for instance, what do you do if your initial graph is a cycle but by the time you get to three dimensions it is a knotted cycle? How do you then project that to two dimensions? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Simpler argument
Talk:2003 Boston Red Sox season

message: This article does not need to be merged or deleted.  I will be working on it.  I will also start the game log and the 2003 AL East Standings template. jj137Talk 2:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No need for deletion 
Talk:Cuneglasus

message: Inexpertly, Cune...Goch would mean "hound - red" (not blue) in Welsh; and Gildas re-rendered the same as "tawny butcher" in Latin, not in Welsh.  So, claiming Gildas was "not correct" is not (necessarily) correct.  Gildas was writing, that the name Cuneglasse, re-rendered in Latin, would then mean (in Latin) "tawny butcher".  If the current article is incorrect, then correcting the errors would improve the piece. 66.235.38.214 (talk) 12:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The glas is the blue part and goch has nothing to do with what Gildas was saying. Another editor has claimed that glas was also used for tawny (Brittonic had a grue color?), explaining Gildas's pun. — LlywelynII 02:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Latin fulvus ("tawny") was used to describe the color of a wolf's pelt by Vergil in the Aeneid (which an educated man like Gildas would certainly have read). In the Welsh Gododdin, wolves are styled glas (likely in its extended meaning of "gray") in verse B.16. In the 9th century Latin Vita of Paul Aurelian of Leon, the saint's bell is named "longi fulva" ("long and tawny") and was glossed in Old Breton as hirglas (hir "long" + glas "gray/blue/green/etc."). Cambridge University Library MS Ff. I.27 (Mommsen's X in his edition of the DEB), which contains material copied in the 12th century, including the DEB, the word lanionibus in sect. 19 of Gildas' text is glossed by lupis "wolves", so it seems certain that lanio "butcher" (i.e. one who tears) was understood in medieval Latin as being a byword for a "wolf". This is all discussed by Neil Wright, 'A Note on Gildas' "lanio fulve"', BBCS 30 (1982), pp. 306-9 (reprinted in: Neil Wright, History and Literature in Late Antiquity and the Early Medieval West: Studies in Intertextuality, Ashgate, 1995 , pp. 105-7).Cagwinn (talk) 06:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Finished expanding the article, based on the suggested source on Welsh prosopography. Further sources would be needed to flesh it out further. Dimadick (talk) 10:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:William McDonough

message: A couple of years ago, I added a few small, cited criticisms of McDonough that were raised in the magazine Fast Company. McDonough PR employee (https://www.linkedin.com/pub/kira-gould/1/6bb/197) KiraGould removed them, as did user RRRFootprint. Having noticed this recently, I spent hours researching criticisms of McDonough, and provided some deeply researched balance to this article, citing Fast Company's detailed profile of McDonough and PBS' Frontline episode dedicated to the flaws in his work. (I also notified KiraGould that her edits were not appropriate under WP:COI.) User RRRFootprint reverted these changes, citing "not enough independent sources - minority views of a specific project." Given McDonough's history of modifying this entry to remove criticisms, and given the speciousness of his reversion claim, I think it's likely that RRRFootprint should also not be contributing to this entry, under WP:COI. I challenge RRRFootprint to demonstrate that he is not prohibited from contributing to this entry under WP:COI. Before further edits are made to add or remove criticisms, they should be addressed here.  --WaldoJ (talk) 17:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: RRRFootprint, are you or are you not prohibited from contributing to this entry under WP:COI? --WaldoJ (talk) 02:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Criticsms
Talk:List of Spanish football transfers 2007-08

message: This page needs heavily updating, I am starting to add dates/fees but help would be appreciated... also needs to be sorted into chronological order. 24framespersecond 03:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Should be merged with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transfers_of_La_Liga_-_2007/2008_season#Real_Madrid_CF 24framespersecond 04:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:South Africa women's national soccer team

message: The black one is the 4th according to:
https://www.footballkitarchive.com/south-africa-women-kits/ 2A00:801:70D:A49B:2DF2:6D8B:BF20:BDEA (talk) 12:17, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerseys are wrong atm
Talk:Metropolitan Area Outer Underground Discharge Channel

message: Some of those linked from  might be obtained with a suitable license. -- Beland (talk) 05:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Pentominium

message: Any construction images? Jerchel (talk) 17:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: As the construction is on hold, should the opening paragraph be altered? Longwayround (talk) 21:01, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently under construction 

message: Dubai's economy is back, no?  So why isn't this tower going to restart construction?? can someone tell me when this tower will be completed? and is it even going to go up if construction doesn't restart? this is one of my favourite towers ever and I really hope it will go up. Jawadreventon (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the update!!! Jawadreventon (talk) 19:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  So when is this ever going to restart construction??? 

message: There have been some recent unsourced changes to this article, stating that construction is to restart and projecting completion dates of 2024 and 2026. I can find no sources to support this. Where is this coming from? Meters (talk) 23:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, I think it's something akin to praying. People thinking that if they just pretend hard enough that the tower is under construction, it will happen. You can see it in the articles for many abandoned megaprojects. Users insert entirely fictitious construction completion dates into the article, possibly in the hope that someone in the project may come across the information and restart construction out of a sense of obligation? Then when the date arrives and the construction site remains as abandoned as ever, they insert another entirely fictitious date three years down the line. The mindset appears to be "as long as we don't acknowledge it isn't canceled, it won't be canceled!" or something like that. All we can do is sigh, remove the false information and ask for better sources. Codraroll (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  construction restart?