lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Happiest Days of Our Lives

message: Many people think that this song is Another Brick Part II. I'll write that, 'k?--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 08:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'll write this... 

message: I removed a bit in parentheses about how Roger also screams in a similar way during "Run Like Hell". I didn't think it was a true and notable reprise -- not like, for example, when David Gilmour's echoing "stone... stone..." from the lyric "dragged down by the stone" in "Dogs" gets reprised during the instrumental middle section of "Sheep". Roger screams a lot, going back to 1967's "Pow R. Toc H." (some truly hideous noises up front!) and '68's "Careful with That Axe, Eugene". On The Wall, I don't think it's the exact scream copied to both songs, is it?
If somebody insists on putting it back in, I'm not gonna remove it again. But I really don't think it's of any importance.
:--Ben Culture (talk) 10:47, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition: Cut parenthetical about "Run Like Hell".
Talk:Gareth Roberts (writer)

message: He wrote the novelisation of Shada, shouldn't this be included in his bibliography? 212.149.216.106 (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Shada

message: The claim that Roberts's conduct "meets the definition" of "transphobia" is original research and inappropriate for Wikipedia.  We cannot be the ones to decide that.  The Wikipedia article can only present what secondary sources have said on the subject.  However, even with the existence of sources that have made such a claim, the section title (which was "Transgender" without anyone complaining for a long time before an anonymous editor changed it to "Transphobia") is not the place for it; there is no space to put a citation or a balanced presentation of multiple views in a section title.  That stuff belongs in the paragraph below, with the appropriate citations, and the section title must remain neutral.  BLP issues are also implicated:  we must be even more careful in this biography of a living person than we would be in some other article, to make sure that the encyclopedia does not take a position of its own. 2607:FEA8:129F:E389:0:0:0:8E3D (talk) 21:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well no, -the controversy concerns his comments being called out as transphobic (which they very clearly objectively are, but whether or not you agree that is explicitly what the controversy is), calling it 'transgender controversy' makes it sound like the the concept of transgender is the thing that's controversial rather than his comments being transphobic.219.88.68.195 (talk) 00:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: He's transphobic. That is not in question. Only transphobes make transphobic comments, and he has. Hence, he's a transphobe. Ignorant hateful bigots are defined by the ignorant hateful bigotry they spew. He spews it in spades. He's a terrible person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.162.105 (talk) 13:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Transphobia" 

message: "Roberts is gay." That's it, the entire section?! Equinox ◑ 21:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Personal life" section
Talk:All Media Network

message: I inserted the "original research" template after reading the "advisable to use caution" sentence. A third-party source should be cited; if not, the sentence should be removed from this article. Todd W. Carter 22:20, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  `Original Research' Template 

message: Hi. I was wondering if there is a template for content in the AMG that would make linking as easy as linking to the IMDB (via Template:Imdb_name and Template:Imdb_title). Assuming there is none, is anyone in favor of creating one? I'd certainly support it. Cheers, Netizen 19:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wanted: IMDB-like template 

message: I can only think of gracenote at the moment which is not much competition. I only use it when there is not much info from amg. Often, gracenote never heard of the artist that amg at least acknowledges exists.1archie99 (talk) 00:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs links to competing databases. 

message: I am merging content from AllRovi into this article.  Actually, that's misleading because there is very little unique content on that page. The AllRovi#Content section is identical to the  Allmusic#Content section, except for the name of the product (AllRovi and Allmusic, respectively). I'm not sure why the AllRovi#History section seems to be mostly about Allmovie, but as you might expect, all of that content can be found on Allmovie and/or All Media Network.  The only thing that is unique is the information about when AllRovi was available, which I have already incorporated into this page. AllRovi was the Rovi-branded version of the All Media Guide, which is now the All Media Network. Rovi still owns the underlying databases, but they sold the web-based interface to All Media Network who maintains the GUI. When looked at from this perspective, AllRovi is simply part of the All Media Guide history which is currently explored on the in this article. --Morphovariant (talk) 05:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from AllRovi
Talk:Movement Against the Monarchy

message: so many people spend so much time on focusing on the bad side to the royal family that no one spends any time concentrating on whats really important about them. Every single person in the world have good and bad sides to them, but no one spends time to explore the godd nature about what ever they are critizing. They are just like ordinary people only with abit of wealth and power, why not give them a chance like the courts in britian to day who even give crimanals a chance even when mudering some one in some cases, i am not comparing the royals to crimanals but i am simply saying 'every body in life gets a chance', some people just always look at the bad sides to life. Are you that person? 
Olivia Garside 14 years old --213.40.67.66  20:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spending time on the bad side 

message: For those interested in further improving the article by adding references, more can be found in this search.  As regards the discussion above, I'd like to make the disclaimer that I am a United States citizen and as such have no particular opinion on the continuing value of the British monarchy; I am simply noting that this protest organization has in fact received a reasonable amount of press coverage from reliable sources. JavaTenor 20:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've added a few references 

message: Really? More so than Republic?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.223.136.134 (talk) 21:34, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The most active and recognised
Category talk:Science fiction films

message: Since 8 out of 23 James Bond films are in this category, would it be safe to say that James Bond films are in general science fiction? Also, since most James Bond films have a plethora of gadgets that verge of sceince fiction tech, all of them could be considered science fiction. So, we could just add Category:Science fiction films to the Category:James Bond films, and remove the Science fiction category from those films. Lady Aleena 09:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Bond films 

message: Another subcategory could be the science fantasy fluff that Disney puts out. Lady Aleena 09:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disney science fiction films

message: Articles in this category should be moved to subcategories when appropriate.
Why?
Does moving not reduce the ability of users to browse similar articles?
I suggest producing appropriate subcategories and then copying articles to them, not moving them.
See Wikipedia talk:Categorization#When is a category too large? -84user (talk) 12:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why move at all? 

message: See also: Wikipedia:Category intersection#Proof of concept implementation
Nationality	Comedy         	Drama         	Science Fiction	Western         	others...
American   	American-comedy	American-drama	American-SF    	American-Western	-
British    	British-comedy 	British-Drama 	British-SF     	British-Western 	-
German     	German-comedy  	German-Drama  	German-SF      	German-Western  	-
Russian    	Russian-comedy 	Russian-Drama 	Russian-SF     	Russian-Western 	-
others     	-              	-             	-              	-               	-
This is just a table to demonstrate a possible appearance, not the implementation. This uses Wikimedia search and so has these drawbacks:
* results shown in database order, not alphabetical
* results shown in search format and not in category format
* two dimensional table limits searches to combining two categories
Note this user-intuitive browsing only works if editors refrain from diffusing categories!
All the technology is already in wikimedia, and hopefully a polished implementation will be produced soon.
-84user (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop diffusing and see what is possible
Talk:Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights

message: I will be deleting the second paragraph in the history of SPHR section.  It reads like a propaganda pamphlet.  SPHR is fundamentally only an anti-Israel organization (calling it pro-Palestinian is probably even a bit of stretch).  I have personally never seen SPHR involved in combating anti-semitism.  On contrary, though they are better than many organizations in limiting their discussions to anti-Israel I have seen them step over the line a number of times.  Unless the author of that paragraph has proof of actual involvement in that area then is has to go.  djheart 20:39, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPHR opposed to anti-semtism???? 
Talk:Bishop of Llandaff Church in Wales High School

message: An anonymous editor has recently made several additions to the article which seem designed to cast the school in a negative light. While the article could see significant expansion from its current state, it is important that it retains a neutral point of view. The statements about uniform are broadly correct but it is inappropriate to make subjective statements about the perceived "neatness" of pupils, while in a balanced article it is unclear why the recent uniform changes would be relevant; similarly, the results/headmaster section is not written from a neutral stance and extrapolates declining performance from a single data point, which is statistically meaningless. I have removed much of this information and ask that it is not re-inserted without a rewrite to comply with our editing policies. 
To the anonymous editor: please consider creating an account on Wikipedia, which will allow other editors to communicate with you more easily and help you to keep track of pages you have edited. --YFB ¿ 00:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions 

message: I think the text referring to best results in Wales/Estyn should now be deleted -there is no reference to allow a date. The latest date given for any info is 2002!
By own survey of results in Wales schools in the last few years would put Bishop of Llandaff way behind many others e.g Stanwell (Penarth). So I think the statement should be justified or removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.141.82 (talk) 10:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results 
Talk:Generic cell rate algorithm

message: __TOC__
Can someone please add yes and no to the parts of the decision diagram that have decisions in them?  I'm not sure exatly what the flow is supposed to be otherwise I would do it myself.
Also, where are the figures it mentions?
Confusing: Definition of terms are lacking.  For instance, what is a "Cell" in this context?
64.109.44.18 (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

message: I intend to give this page a thorough coat of looking at, specifically to address the misapprehensions it contains on the leaky bucket algorithm. For example the statement that the GCRA "provides a traffic shaping function" falls so far of the mark, it's painful. 
However, before that can be done, the page on the leaky bucket needs to be addressed. To that end, I have created a leaky bucket/rewrite page, which needs to be reviewed. Comments please.
Graham Fountain 16:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  update of page
Category talk:Time Lords

message: Why is Krazy Kong in this category? True, he is a Time Lord, but the category specifically states that it's only for the Time lords from Doctor Who. And anyway, besides from that, it's pretty obvious that Krazy Kong is a different species from Doctor Who's Time Lords, or is that original research? If anything, it seems more like OR to include insane fan theories about how they're the same species! Perhaps we could create a "disambiguation category"? --UserJDalek 23:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I have now read the page, and although it does mention a Dalek, it seems highly likely that it's just vandalism, especially after reading Krazy Kong Album, which actually has sources and makes no mention of them, or Time Lords, or any other element of Doctor Who. --UserJDalek 00:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krazy Kong
Category talk:UNIT

message: With regards to the group's new official name of Unified Intelligence Taskforce, should this category be renamed? - NP Chilla (talk) 00:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe just to UNIT, to avoid choosing between the new name and the one most commonly known? --Brian Olsen (talk) 01:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

text: agreed, has to be changed. maybe "Category:UNIT (Doctor Who)" as a new name because UNIT is quite common?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.92.117.93 (talk) 19:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No need for any disambiguation (the (Doctor Who) part, I mean), because there is no other category named "Unit" - the categories that might have that name are all named "Units of measure" or "Units of length" instead. :Category:UNIT already redirects here, so we could just switch them around. --Brian Olsen (talk) 14:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming?
Talk:Standard asteroid physical characteristics

message: Hi there!
The matter of how the data for physical characteristics  in the numbered asteroid pages (E.g. on List of asteroids) is obtained has been bugging me for some time. For example, the mean temperature. I haven't been able to find any particular place where such matters have been explained or references given. I suppose that I might not be the only one who wonders about this. 
So - i've tried to put up what I surmise so far, as a bait for all those of you who have been working with the asteroids for longer, and know what is up. Edit please! Deuar 20:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this article be moved out from the article namespace since it doesn't seem to be a real encyclopedic article but more like a guide page?--JyriL talk 22:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds spot on, as long as it remains editable. The point of it is basically to be a very long footnote to :Template:Infobox_Minor_Planet. I'd do it myslelf, but i'm not familiar with how to carry it out. Deuar 11:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I've run across a problem with inputting data to the generic Planet infobox (typically used for asteroids/comets/etc as well)... you can give a rotation period for the two bodies around each other, but not their separation distance/SMA (which would be a fairly obvious thing for a planet-moon system), nor is it clear how to input separate rotation periods for each body if they're not tidally locked (ditto; i.e. if Earth-Moon was considered a binary, we'd be a bit stuck for entering both Earth's own rotation as well as that of the Moon around it, and for how far the Moon is from Earth). Heck, even entering separate sizes for each partner in a binary (or trinary) is a bit of a bodge where you have to insert inline headings to the Dimensions cell. And such characteristics aren't even mentioned on this article page. Unless I'm missing something obvious in both cases?
Binary/trinary planets and asteroids are a somewhat new concept in astronomy, but compared to the age of WP itself they're old news (the particular object I hit trouble with was first determined as a binary back in 2001). Surely it should be possible to register their details correctly and in full? 146.199.0.203 (talk) 18:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about binaries/trinaries?
Talk:Sketty (electoral ward)

message: I have suggested in the article Sketty that the interpretation of the name offered by academics is challengeable.  So what is the alternative?  The common element in both ‘Sketty’ and ‘Cockett’ is ‘kett’, plausibly a corruption of ‘coed’, meaning ‘wood’ (which also appears in early sources written ‘coet’).  It is significant that the ridge of high ground separating the two is Cefn Coed, though today the wood is largely gone.  If correct, this would imply the village names in their respective original forms to be ‘Is-Coed’ (‘below the wood’) and ‘Uwch-Coed’ (‘above the wood’).  Is there a published source for this view?  David Robins (talk) 17:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the Name
Talk:I'm Lovin' It (song)

message: Is Timberland the producer of this song as shown in Wikitable or The Neptunes as it is stated in the main article?
Definitely the Neptunes... the style is every reminiscent of their work cirqa that time period, and Snoop claims it's a "Neptizzle Productizzle" on the remix. (Rishi B 23:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer ambiguity 

message: *For the Record: Quick News On Justin Timberlake
* Pop Star Leads McDonald's Global Ad Campaign Launch
*JUSTIN TIMERLAKE WORKS ON MCDONALD'S VIDEO AND SONG
*MCDONALD'S GLOBAL CAMPAIGN TO DEBUT IN EUROPE
*MCDONALD'S TO SIGN POP STAR JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE
*Shake and Shimmy
*McDonald’s reviews “I’m Lovin’ It” messaging
*Justin Timberlake Is No Longer Lovin' It
*Justin Timberlake still 'Lovin' it' with tour sponsorship
*Online Extra: Marketing in the "the Age of I"
*Justin Timberlake: He’s lovin it
*McDonald's Lovin' Its Turnaround
*McDonald's: 'we may not win obesity debate'
*Translation Advertising: Where Shop Meets Hip-Hop
*'I'm lovin' it' a hit as McDonald's aims for new markets
*McDonald's(R) and Justin Timberlake Team Up for U.S. and European Concert Tour
*McDonald's 'I'm Lovin' It' is nation's favourite phrase
— Status (talk · contribs) 18:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Interstate 395

message: I undeleted the reference to U.S. Highway 395 because it follows the style manual in using "See also" to explain a similar term that may be confused.  When I first looked for U.S. Highway 395 in Wikipedia I ended up on Interstate 395 and was (at first) confused as to why it wasn't listed.  Of course I figured out that while multi-state, it wasn't an Interstate, and this helps others with that distinction.  — RandallJones 21:07, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Highway 395
Talk:Battle of Springfield

message: The Springfield Township, Union County, New Jersey page has a nice description of the battle -- and James Caldwell's actions -- that could be pasted into this new page. Thanks for the work! Alansohn 21:10, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Although there should be a map showing the order of battle, the article is so rich with infoboxes, images, and other diagrams, that I felt it was good enough. What we need now is more precise citations, and this will be pretty thorough. --Leifern 15:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria #5
Talk:List of Scottish monarchs

message: A problem here is the English language. Historically the name 'Scotland' has been used in English for two distinct kingdoms. Firstly for the ancient gaelic kingdom of Alba and secondly for the later kingdom comprising the whole of modern Scotland. Confusing one with the other is a bit like conflating the kingdom of England with the kingdom of Wessex. The wikipage on Alba says it persisted until 1286 - so that arguably the 'kingdom of Scotland' in  modern usage didn't exist until 1287. Arguably too there were no 'kings of the Scots' (except in the English language)  until then - they had previously all been Rìgh na h-Alba or King of the Albanach. Translating the name of today's Scotland into the gaelic name Alba is equally confusingly modern usage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.38.110 (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  the name 'Scotland' has been used in English for two distinct kingdoms 

message: Idi Amin Dada has been claimed the title. See also the title of the oscars awarded movie The Last King of Scotland. Should this be mentioned in some way? --82.52.25.126 (talk) 13:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's mentioned here. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:45, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed titled 

message: The date range for the reign of Malcolm III is incorrect within the family tree diagram.  It should be 1058 to 1093.  Jame5 07961 (talk) 19:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date range incorrect for Malcolm III within SVG file 

message: Mary married William III, prince of orange and not William II 2A02:C7C:CB3D:6B00:9161:269A:E29F:7070 (talk) 21:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong reference 

message: According to their respective articles, Donald III didn't have any sons, and Malcolm III's sons were David I, Edgar and Alexander I. But this tree wrongly shows all three as Donald's sons. Richard75 (talk) 18:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in family tree
Talk:Herrenhausen Gardens

message: according to the official Hannover website the rebuilt building is 'Herrenhausen Palace', not castle... see http://www.hannover.de/en/Welcome-to-Hannover/Economy-Business2/Congress-City-Hannover/Event-Locations/Locations-Hannover/Herrenhausen-Palace-Conference-Centre  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4DD0:F87F:0:A935:E89A:1F5A:9359 (talk) 01:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herrenhausen Palace?! 
Talk:Maile Flanagan

message: Who comes up with this drivel?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.221.240.20 (talk) 14:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIlitary Intel officers are not "spies" 
Talk:Wiki Wiki Shuttle

message: I would like to see someone take a picture of a wiki wiki bus for inclusion in the article.
:I'm going to add a photo by Ross Mayfield, licensed as CC. --Viriditas 09:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest changing the picture in the article to this one, which in my opinion works better. Waldir 10:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

message: hey,
A friend of mine recently was on Hawaii, and told me the bus is still there, and sent me a photo of it. It is called now "Wiki Wiki Shuttle" and there are people sitting in it on the photo, so I guess the ceased operations might not be entirely correct. effeietsanders 00:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  still there 

message: wiki is actually the word "quick" hawaiianized, NOT a native hawaiian or even polynesian term.
wording should be tweaked.  216.50.220.28 (talk) 10:34, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually according to a pretty reliable source it is a Polynesian term. Are you sure it's not? πr2 (t • c) 06:31, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  not hawaiian! 

message: Is there anyone who knows more precisely when the buses were switched back to "Wiki Wiki"?
Sources that discuss why are especially welcome: is it simply because the contract with Roberts Hawaii expired, or might it be because the "Wiki Wiki Shuttle" has attained some modicum of independent fame thanks to its Wikipedia history...? (Pure speculation from me at this point)
90.229.34.175 (talk) 07:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The switch back to "Wiki Wiki"