Talk:Email filtering

message: ====Uses====
*Autoresponders, out of office, vacation
*Mailing lists
*Meta, categories, flags
*Spam, junk mail, trash can
*Viruses, attachments
====Technology overview====
*Algorithms
*Intuitiveness
====Server-side technology====
*Exchange server
*Perl
*Webmail
====Client-side technology====
*AVG
*Microsoft Outlook (and Express)
*Norton
*Thunderbird
====Client/Server Interaction====
*SpamCoach, etc.
*spamc/spamd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KitchM (talk • contribs) 21:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections

message: *SpamCoach, etc.
*spamc/spamd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KitchM (talk • contribs) 21:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Client/Server Interaction

message: *GMail
*Hotmail
*Yahoo!
----
*Started by –– Constafrequent (talk page) 07:51, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Service providers

message: *Page has been moved to Email filtering, without the hyphen in "e-mail", to represent the most common spelling.
*I've been advised about Mail filter. Will consider merging articles.
–– Constafrequent (talk page) 12:14, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 01:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as hyphen is preferred in formal writing and to standardize w/ existing. --Dhartung | Talk 03:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Articles Anti-spam techniques (users), Anti-spam techniques and Email Authentication provide the details of mail filtering.
An idea for further improvement and redesign (see Talk:Anti-spam techniques#The 2012 merging proposal (server + users)) envisages four parts:
# an overarching one with lots of theory and explanation of mail headers and authentication and so on without being biased towards what might happen at the ISP level,
# a part from the users' perspective (possibly named something like "spam recognition and trapping") dealing specifically what mail clients and users see,
# another on spam filtering and blacklisting at the receiving mail server/ISP end, and
# another on protocols/laws/history of what mail servers may allow to pass/relay (and international laws/conventions as to what steps they might take at a system level to vet what may pass)
This page seems to me the best candidate for the first entry, Anti-spam techniques (users) for the second, while the two other articles, together, give a fairly good account of the third argument.
ale (talk) 17:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companion pages 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Content filtering - Spam and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 19#Content filtering - Spam until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Content filtering - Spam" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]