Talk:Cillit Bang

message: Ive been studying easy off bam degreaser (from australia) recently and found that it is in fact a base so its not the same as cillit bang, i also havent been able to find any information anywhere of what it might contain. I titrated the bam, using HCl to neutralize it and got a molarity of 0.104
this product is definently not safe for children and skin contact should be avoided
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.254.83 (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easy off Bam, base? 

message: "
Cillit Bang Grime & Lime can be used on glass, acrylic plastic, ceramics (wash basins, toilet bowls, etc.), wall and floor tiles, PVC floor coating, chrome and under-3s.
Cillit Bang Grime & Lime should not be used on any acid sensitive material, such as marble or enamel, aluminium, copper, stone, zinc-plated metals, kitchen worktops, cattle, linoleum, varnished, waxed or oiled wood floors, rubber, textiles or carpets.
"
Using acid-based cleaners on your 3-year old is not recommended, though cattle may well scrub up well. 131.111.21.21 (talk) 19:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amusing vandalism (removed, but here for posterity) 

message: I have changed the article, Easy Off Bam is the Australian name not the American name.
Adamshappy
:It is also known as Easy-Off Bam in the USA. --Dave2 21:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change 

message: This has to be a joke... right? --dsm iv tr 23:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravy? 

message: should one be added? we all know Cillit Bang is very powerful, but the purple packaging is attractive to kids (vimto, blackcurrent). so should a warning not to drink Cillit Bang be added to the page?
:I don\'t think so. Children are unlikely to read Wikipedia prior to going in search of bright pink bottles. Stannered 00:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit: Fu kinell, please do not edit my talk page comments. Please read Wikipedia:Talk pages#Basic rules for all talk pages. Cheers, Stannered 17:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: With a pink label, and nozzle-spray bit. (I have not actually ever use a Cillit Bang bottle, so was going on the basis of the advertising. Google Image Search proved me semi-wrong.) Stannered 18:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

text: So it seems :-) Stannered 19:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consumption warning 

message: :Image:Cillit Bang Coin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cillit Bang Coin.jpg

message: :Image:Cillit Bang logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cillit Bang logo.jpg

message: Cillit bang no longer contains phosphoric acid, at least in the UK you can get the product formulations for Reckitt Benckiser products here:
http://www.rbeuroinfo.com/index.php  For the european union.
http://www.rbnainfo.com/productpro/ProductSearch.do For North America
http://www.rb-msds.com.au/home/default.aspx For Australia.
The current UK formulation of Cillit Bang Power Cleaner - Grime & Lime in the UK uses Sulfamic acid, Formic acid and Oxalic acid, the Oxalic acid is probably responsible for its ability to remove rust stains (see wikipedia article for oxalic acid).
The nearest Australian equivalent seems to be Easy Off BAM! Power Cleaner Grime and Soap Scum which just contains Sulfamic and Formic acid.
And the US EASY-OFF® BAM® Grime & Lime - Trigger appears to be the same formulation as the Australian version.
188.220.252.46 (talk) 14:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer contains phosphoric acid 

message: this post has an edit request or possible deletion due to a comedian who is on wikipedia 
IF YOU WANT TO WRITE ABOUT COMEDY OR READ SOMETHING HILARIOUS POST IT ONTO UNCYCLOPEDIA YOU VANDAL VANDALISM IS NOT ACCEPTED ON WIKIPEDIA OR YOU WILL BE REPORTED AND BANNED
Do not worry, I have fixed the article to one before the edits were made. Thank's for your efforts.
Lbmarshall (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: URGENT EDIT REQUESTED OR COMPLETE REMOVAL OF THIS POST DUE TO COMICAL ACTIONS

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cillit Bang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060303155636/http://www.easyoffbam.us/ to http://www.easyoffbam.us/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051013055157/http://www.barryscott.blogs.com/ to http://www.barryscott.blogs.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051013081646/http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2005/09/on_cillit_bang_and_a_new_low_for_marketers.shtml to http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2005/09/on_cillit_bang_and_a_new_low_for_marketers.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is it me or does this read more like an advice and promotional piece on the product and not like an encyclopaedic entry?
A concerned anon
86.7.223.84 (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias / Validity of article?