lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Non-free use disputed

message: I have given the template a change in design, to match other "Image in trouble" templates. I also added the copyright symbol, as the images using it are definitely copyrighted. I hope this is a good idea... Wcquidditch 00:42, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I later withdrew the symbol since all images with this template have a fair use template.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New look 

message: I've seen this applied to book and album cover scans, where the fair use tag itself provides the same rationale that will apply to every usage in an article on the author or product itself; the only thing the uploader did not do was restate that rationale with the variables "in article X" punched in.  How is it more productive for someone to apply this template than to just fix the problem themselves?  Particularly since this template practically screams "please sue Wikimedia for copying this image we don't even think we have a right to use."  The fair use tags serve as our declaration to the copyright owner of our good faith rights to use the image, whether or not that declaration is restated with specific reference to the articles; we should not undercut that declaration (and thereby our good faith) needlessly.
The biggest problem I think is when this tag is just applied to the image description page and no one is told about it.  Notifying the uploader is woefully insufficient.  The articles in which an image is used are clearly stated at the bottom of the page; a notice should be posted on the talk pages of any such articles requesting a fair use rationale for that usage if it is actually more complicated than just plugging in the article names into a fair use rationale that is standard for that type of image.  Postdlf 18:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is being poorly implemented 

message: I notice there was a lack of instructions about what to do after opening the "dispute". I've added instructions to bring this template in line with WP:CSD, providing a templated way to notify the uploader and to nominate it for deletion if no sufficient fair use claim is established. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added instructions 

message: It would make the admin backlogs MUCH easier to clear up if someone (preferably someone who knows more about the intricacies of things than I do) could set up the subst: and date-categorized system we have on such standbys as  and . Anyone up for it? (ESkog)(Talk) 03:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To put this in line with other image tagging templates... 

message: I have (I think) created the dated alternative I discussed above -  for disputed fair use. It looks and feels like  - only one argument, which is the reason for the dispute. The documentation says that, unlike prod, it can't be removed by anyone - it instead needs to be reviewed by an admin and either kept or deleted. Feel free to edit mercilessly or reject completely. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible alternative
Talk:H. Irving Hancock

message: has a bunch more information, but it's a complete mess. It needs a huge amount of rewriting and rearranging to make it encyclopedic, so I reverted to a short but well-written encyclopedic page.--Prosfilaes 00:53, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've reverted of the article back to "H. Irving Hancock" instead of "Harrie Irving Hancock" as that is the form of his name he is known by from his published books. Andrew Sly 07:37, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article 

message: The following clearly belongs here, not in the article itself, so I moved it here.Adam keller 23:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Doubt about Statemeyer Syndicate

message: The list of countries which have invaded the U.S in invasion literature had China down twice. Corrected Alex1guy 12:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Repetition Mistake
Talk:Animation in the United States in the television era

message: Crusader Rabbit was the first cartoon produced for TV. To say it was "one of the first" is like saying George Washington was one of the first Presidents...technically true but an absurd way to say it. 74.104.189.176 (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The FIRST!!
Talk:Fei Yu-ching

message: here's a start. Nateji77 01:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography
Talk:Charles A. Duelfer

message: Nightline is going to report on the "Saddam Tapes."  
:Reportedly armed with 12 hours of Saddam Hussein's audio recordings, the organizers of an upcoming "Intelligence Summit" are describing the tapes as the "smoking gun evidence" that the Iraqi dictator possessed weapons of mass destruction in the period leading up to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has already authenticated the tapes.  These are the same tapes mentioned in Duelfer's Report that had not been translated at the time of the report.  For some reason, the tapes were released through a very unusual manner - possibly because some in the intelligence community did not want the truth to come out. The information here will be relevant to many current issue type articles on Wikipedia.  Read news story here. RonCram 15:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please watch Nightline tonight, Feb. 15 
Talk:Daily Nexus

message: I added an "Awards" section referencing awards won by the Daily Nexus in 2009, 2012 and 2013.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchristison (talk • contribs) 01:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition

message: In accordance with this discussion, this article has been kept. IceKarmaॐ 01:15, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: Is it Artsweek or ArtsWeek????   I see the former high, and the latter low.  What do you do with something that I am sure has been both ways, and probably ArTsWeEk, according to ed. caprice over the years?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.127.55.62 (talk) 07:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artsweek case? 
Talk:Dis

message: Links to this page from the main article space have been redirected to more appropriate targets. Courtland 01:26, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearing links to this disambiguation page 

message: The first link on this page is currently a reference to Altered Beast, but that page does not seem to contain the text " dis " or " Dis ", and the disambig target is missing.  --Connel MacKenzie -  wikt 22:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First link
Talk:Howard Mills III

message: Going through the edit histories here, I think it was a little unfair of some editors to remove stuff from Mills' official bio becuase of "POV-concerns". That resulted in a very unbalanced article that was only negative. One time, it was removed as a "Copyvio", while the transposed official biographies of other Superintendents were left alone. One could have easily looked the claims up and then sourced them. On the other hand, these revisions of course led people of the opposite perspective to log in, delete everything negative, and flood the article with the positive. Since this article is not edited very often, you end up having a couple of months of a Mills hit piece, followed by a couple of months of a glowing tribute, composed mostly by well intentioned authors after the initial revision/blanking. I've attempted to merge as much from both sides as I can, and cite everything to allay any future concerns. MrPrada (talk) 18:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 
Category talk:Martial artists

message: is this a category for (1) professional martial artist who compete for money, or (2) actors who are famous (to some degree) for their martial arts displays in movies/tv. as it stands now, i think this list is incongruous and most likely should be split. uri budnik 01:33, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Martial arts uses the idea "systems of codified practices and traditions of training for combat". In this regard, martial arts practitioners are those who are trained in systems such as taekwondo, karate, wushu, etc. Shawnc 05:50, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the definition of this category?

message: Should individuals be placed under the root "Martial arts practitioners" as well as subcategories, or subcategories only? Please comment. Shawnc 05:52, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcategories
Talk:Catholic Church in the United States

message: Under politics, it says, "with the church championing... gun control,[78]" but what is cited is not an official statement from the Church supporting gun control, but rather what seems to be an opinion piece from 2013 from uscatholic.org arguing that Catholics ought to support gun control which in turn cites another opinion piece from Washington Post arguing the same thing. This seems a bit misleading because by the wording of saying that the Church is "championing" gun control, it sounds like the Church has officially endorsed gun control in the US, which doesn't seem to be the case at least based on the source cited. If no one can come up with a better source, I think that it should be removed, or at least clarified.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMM12345 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no response here for almost two months, so I removed the claim that the Church supports gun control from the article. If you want to restore it, please cite a better source.JMM12345 (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Their official position(s) are laid out here, although whether this qualifies as "supporting gun control" is a matter of interpretation: https://www.usccb.org/resources/backgrounder-gun-violence-mercy-and-peacebuilding-approach-gun-violence-january-2020 MrArticleOne (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  gun control 

message: It was totally correct for 209.183.216.36 to remove Melania Trump's name from this selected list of notable Catholics, because the entry was unsourced. According to WP:BLPREMOVE policy any other name without a corresponding citation can be removed from that list as well. I've restored Trump's entry with several citations as evidence of her faith. Thank you, 209.183.216.36, for bringing this to our attention! Elizium23 (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melania Trump
Talk:Dog Fashion Disco

message: To all editors, I know it was announced via MySpace about the breakup. However that is a future date. Please to not change article to past tense until dates have past (January 2007). -- immunity 05:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breaking Up 

message: The biography desperately needs expanded, anyone willing to take up the challenge? Ideally a full biography from '96-'07, but even at least key events from the latter years would be good. Foolish Child 15:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography 

message: When would be a good time to start articles on the new bands? I'd love to write the article on Polkadot Cadaver. Will they count as notable once the album comes out? Pwrong 14:54, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New bands 
Talk:Æthelmod

message: I have deleted that sentence "Scholars currently believe that only kings had the power to grant lands at this time in Anglo-Saxon England; if their assumption is correct, then this would prove Æthelmod was a king" because it is false. Grants could be and were made by kings, nobles, bishops, widows, whatever. In the Sawyer catalogue numbers S 1 to S 1163 refer to grants by kings and numbers S 1164 to S 1428 to grants by other people.
Hovite 01:58, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:North Newton, Kansas

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  22:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: North Newton? Isn't it just newton? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.113.105.17 (talk • contribs)  01:59, 26 September 2005
*No, Newton and North Newton are two seperate and distinct municipalities. StudierMalMarburg 19:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Newton is NOT Newton 
Talk:Assyrian

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Assyrian Protestants. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 11#Assyrian Protestants until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  (t · c) buidhe 04:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Assyrian Protestants" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:2005 Atlantic hurricane season/Archive 7

message: I've been reading some volcano articles and I ran across Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mountains.  These guys seem pretty organized (as I'm sure other wikiprojects are) and I think some of these ideas would be helpful for work on tropical cyclones.
Now I'm not saying a wikiproject should be created immediately.  The first step in further organization would be to get some useful templates going (templates for infoboxes for hurricanes and hurricane seasons) and a more centralized place for discussion of these issues.  Current discussion (that I have read) seems to center in this talk page and in Talk:List of notable tropical cyclones but is pretty spread out.
Does anyone object to this idea?  Is there actually more organization out there that I don't know about?  Is there somewhere else I should be suggesting this?
Jdorje 02:50, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, my mistake!  There is already Template:Infobox hurricane and Template:Infobox Hurricane Season.  These are good (though not used everywhere, which is I guess why I thought it was just infoboxes being used).  What's missing then is a Template:hurricane that can go on the discussion page for each hurricane (season) and serves to point potential editors to the location where standards are given (and where standards discussion takes place).  Compare to Template:mountain.  (P.S.  Why is it "hurricane" rather than "tropical cyclone"?  This is shortest and makes sense to me but may be too America-centric.) Jdorje 03:42, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Sure.  Is there interest in making a wikiproject for hurricanes?  Anyone interested in this should first check out Template_talk:hurricane where I've put the beginnings for some guidelines and standards (feel free to edit it, of course).  Only if there are enough contributors (the Wikiproject guidelines say at least 5 people or so) should a Wikiproject be made.  Jdorje 09:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better organization of hurricane projects
Talk:Breaking Out Is Hard to Do

message: The section is supported by very few reviews, and in reality, the section is the most important, as it shows us that it was noticed by others, that it got critical reception, and that it was worth mentioning. Without a stronger reception section, it could be merged, and of course demoted from GA status. Please fix; I'm no inclusionist, but episodes should also hold themselves up to a certain standard. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception section sorely lacking
Talk:Donna Barr

message: Alteration:  changed designation of Pfirsich as Erwin's younger brother to older brother.  Pfirsich looks younger, but is actually supposed to be slightly older than the Fox.
Alteration again: nevermind, double-checked and Pfirsich is younger.  Sorry.  Ignore me.
====Huh?====
"She was born in Everett, Washington, the second child in a "pod" of six siblings."
What is this? Invasion of the podpeople in Wikipedia? Unless it's a term she uses herself (and then, the quotation should be blatant) or this sentence should be rephrased in a more encyclopedic way...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.224.148.118 (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "She was born in Everett, Washington, the second child in a "pod" of six siblings."
What is this? Invasion of the podpeople in Wikipedia? Unless it's a term she uses herself (and then, the quotation should be blatant) or this sentence should be rephrased in a more encyclopedic way...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.224.148.118 (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: There is not a single reference cited on this page. Chryslerfan (talk) 01:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Crurotarsi

message: Can someone translate this article into ENGLISH?  Not technicalese, ENGLISH.
:It is in English  ;-)  I wrote this article in a non-technical way; I don't know how much more non-technical one can get!  After all, it is necessary to define these concepts in a technical manner, because it is a technical subject, it is the same in field of science; paleontology and zoology are no exception.  Have a read of Benton 2004; excellent textbook, very readable, non-technical (well, i think so), much easier to read than Carroll 1988 (actually Benton 2004 is a good intro to Carroll 1988 because he introduces all thes etchnical concepts very well), but you still have to learn the jargon, and that book introduces the jargon. 
:references:
:*Benton, M. J. (2004), Vertebrate Paleontology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd 
:*Carroll, R. L. (1988), Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, WH Freeman & Co. 
:M Alan Kazlev 09:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An encyclopedia is not a novel.--MWAK 13:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

message: The lede states the name was erected in 1991 by Paul Sereno, but the taxobox gives a reference to Sereno & Arcucci (1990). So was the origin 1991 or 1990? Icalanise (talk) 16:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like 1990 is correct.  MMartyniuk (talk) 22:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name 

message: Hi, I have recently been reading works such as that of Brussate et.al and it becomes apparent that on this particular article, Archosauria is a clade within Crurotarsi. Whereas, in such woks that I have read, isn't Crurotarsi a taxon within Archosauria, and subsequently sister taxon with Avemetatarsalia (Ornithodira). Sadly, I don't know how to edit a Taxobox, so could someone else possibly do so?--GaryGLouw 17:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're absolutely right. I was very confused as this article directly contradicts the main article on Archosaurs it's linked to. Someone should fix that.--MWheeler 06:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

text: This article takes Nesbitt's article as confirmed and accepted by the mainstream, but I'm not sure it has been yet. A 2016 article (described in the Phytosauria article) refuted Nesbitt's findings and put Phytosauria back into Pseudosuchia. A neutral Crurotarsi article should define it as it is defined taxonomically: the clade that contains both Phytosauria and Crocodylidae. From there the article can discuss the position of Phytosauria vs. Pseudosuchia and the uncertainty surrounding Avemetatarsalia's position. Perhaps the rewrite can start with excavating some of the material from earlier versions of this article, and some from Phytosauria? 2601:441:4900:A6E0:BC24:250B:783:9812 (talk) 00:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomic Correctness
Template talk:Bioguide

message: I have seen this template all over the place on articles. I have seen it in the sources.
I have seen it underneath the successionbox and I have also seen it at the absolute bottom of the page. Where does this belong.
Thanks in advanced. --Jamo58 (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  There needs to be clear guidance on where this template is placed. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 14:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does this go in an article? 

message: I think it's this template but there's a hidden link around somewhere that's incorrectly linking to Biographical Directory of the United States Congress (with the tick marks in it) instead of it without the ticks. See this page. It's showing up as over 3,000 incoming links at WantedPages. The agency link isn't supposed to be italicized as it is used. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Would someone be willing to test removing the layer of translucation and just copying the contents of template:Include-USGov in here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden link 

message: Change "Biographical Directory of the United States Congress" to italics to match the Wikipedia article's title, per MOS:MAJORWORK. DocWatson42 (talk) 14:14, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: firefly ( t · c ) 20:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 7 August 2021
Talk:How Long's a Tear Take to Dry?

message: In accordance with this discussion, this article has been kept. IceKarmaॐ 03:33, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: Hanna-Barbera was all but defunct/merged with Warner Brothers and Cartoon Network by the turn-of-the-millennium, so how could it be by them?--24.95.149.90 (talk) 18:14, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanna-Barbara?
Talk:Gurkha

message: To be a Gorkhali soldier or recruitment in British and Indian  regiments, you have to gain a Nepalese citizenship.SubodhSubedi123 (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: ...or be an Indian Gorkha - who have Indian citizendship, not Nepalese. So no. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: u need to have Nepali citizenship to be recruited in every Gurkha regiment for Indian Gurkha, British Gurkha and Gurkha contingent Singapore police force. 2404:7C00:52:76E8:D19:C480:A8CA:D234 (talk) 01:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality of Gurkga 

message: Hf 2402:E280:2109:192:14E0:6A92:2B05:3F70 (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gorkha 

message: There is false information that says that Gurkhas compositions is from Nepali speaking Indian people.This is totally false infact truth is Gurkhas compositions is of Nepalese people and some are from the son of retired veterans from Nepal who served in Indian Gurkha and settled in India 2404:7C00:52:76E8:D19:C480:A8CA:D234 (talk) 01:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe check the article again? It says Gurkhas (the military unit) is from the Indian subcontinent, as it was formed before the end of British rule. Further, it states the unit is composed of Nepalis and Indian Gorkha, which are Nepali-speaking citizens of India. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  False information on composition of Gurkhas  

message: 120.89.104.82 (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where gurkhas deployed around the world?
Talk:Russell Erxleben

message: In accordance with this discussion, this article has been kept. IceKarmaॐ 03:58, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: Would it be possible for someone in the know to add a pronunciation guide to this man's last name on the page? DarkStarHarry (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounciation Guide