Talk:San Francisco Police Department

message: Friends,
Becaue this page is not too long, is not in need of splitting and because I did a fucking hell of a lot of  research on the list of notable events, i would like to ask  Cris to stop deleting my work. I know the list has been moved, but the list is an integral part of an emerging wikipedia page. If you want me to turn it into a narative, I will, over time, write the entiore sordid hidtory of the SFPD, but please stop deleting my work! Hchapot 
69.3.234.242 03:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First, you have to calm down. No need to personal attack me. People got blocked here for such thing. Second, I didn't delete your work. Your work is in another article you created named List of notable events in the history of the San Francisco Police Department. In wikipedia, you don't put the same thing in two different articles. I see your effort in collaborating the list. And I liked it. But I don't see the point in repeating the same thing over again here. Chris! my talk 06:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I move the link for the notable list up to the history section. So that it is more visible to other readers visiting the page. Chris! my talk 06:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hank Chapot

message: I've added an infobox, imported the Department's shoulder patch, and greatly added to the list of famous cases.  Hopefully someone with more time on his/her hands will be able to expand that list into something worth reading one of these days.  A good source is here: MisterSF.com under "Notorious SF."  The SFPD's official history page isn't terribly helpful on specifics. --Dynafow 20:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox & case additions

message: There seems to be a nascent edit war heating up over the disappearing-reappearing "Trivia" section, specifically in regards to whether the Dead Kennedys' featuring burning SFPD cruisers on the cover of one of their albums merits inclusion in the SFPD's Wikipedia article.  Hank Chapot has kept restoring the Dead Kennedys reference, while SBoyd415 and I have both reverted it.  Hank Chapot has made some valid contributions to the article, and I don't want to put him off, but I don't think that particular bit of information belongs on this page (the DKs' page is another matter).
I have expanded the "Baby Blue" blurb, the only other current occupant of the trivia section besides the DKs album-cover thing, and eliminated the trivia section for the time being.Dynaflow 09:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia section

message: I am currently making major changes to this article to improve it. The reason for this is that the info this article provided before is not very encyclopedic. So if anyone wants to help, please join. Chris 22:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed some phrasing and grammar and removed the clean up tag, while placing a 'sources needed' template in the History section, which could use a lot of expansion and sourcing. MissMJ 23:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

text: It's ok. I fix it. Also most of the things on the list of famous cases and events are unsourced, so please fix that. Chris 02:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: If you like to contribute, you should consider joining wikipedia. It's free. Chris 02:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After reading your list again, I see one more problem. Go read WP:Notability, because I feel some of the events on the list are not notable. Like the earthquake in 1906, you didn't explain the involvement of SFPD in that event. So that is not irrelevant to the scope of this article. Things put in this article should only be relevant to SFPD, nothing else. Chris 02:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your list is too long for this article. You can consider creating an entire new article to list all the events of SFPD. A shortened version can then be put in this article. Chris 02:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: That blue link only lead readers to that page. It doesn't mean that it doesn't need a citation. As a matter of fact, that bombing page is not even adequately sourced.  Chris! my talk 19:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Hey, no problem at all. We were all new editors at one point. For general help on Wikipedia and for some good rules of thumb, visit WP:PILLARS or WP:HELPDESK. As for these specific actions, be careful not to violate Wikipedia's policy on original research which essentially states that all additions must come from a source rather than one's personal knowledge. Let me know if you have further questions. Go Phightins! (talk) 01:41, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: :Image:SFPD Patch.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SFPD Patch.gif

message: I added a citation needed tag to the airport bureau.  I am looking for the reference which proves that the SF Airport Police merged with the SFPD.  Wikipedia someones has wrong information, sometimes this is because a few administrators are bullies and can tick off genuine users and a few of these ticked off people retaliate by changing information.  I am trying to find out if this fact is true because I need to contact the airport police and google linked to this article.
Wikipedia can have wrong information so please add references. WKPD1 (talk) 18:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation needed 

message: This is is a good article – thanks to those involved. I came to this article curious about the size of SFPD in relation to other cities. Specifically, how many officers are there and what's the budget? Compared to other cities where I've lived, it seems like this city has an unusually intensive need for police. Are there any breakdowns about how much crime exists here and what we spend on our police force compared to other cities?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy54321 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much and how many? 

message: Been chief for more than a week.
DonL (talk) 22:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greg Suhr ? 

message: Johnsfpd (talk) 00:11, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "SFPD Prison Bus" 

message: * Northern district: http://sf-police.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=12829 - http://www.webcitation.org/6JJI0lQfx
WhisperToMe (talk) 14:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Street maps 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on San Francisco Police Department. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090725042741/http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/pdlc00.pdf to http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/pdlc00.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131102220731/http://blogs.kqed.org/newsfix/2011/07/25/bayview-shooting-explaining-the-discrepancy-between-sfpd-guns-and-bullet-found-in-kenneth-harding/ to http://blogs.kqed.org/newsfix/2011/07/25/bayview-shooting-explaining-the-discrepancy-between-sfpd-guns-and-bullet-found-in-kenneth-harding/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080917184856/http://www.sfpatrolspecpolice.com:80/SFPatrolSpecialPolice-mission.html to http://sfpatrolspecpolice.com/SFPatrolSpecialPolice-mission.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on San Francisco Police Department. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgov.org/site/police_index.asp?id=19888
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012232628/http://www.sfgov.org/site/police_index.asp?id=35889 to http://www.sfgov.org/site/police_index.asp?id=35889
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216124425/http://www.policemag.com:80/Channels/SWAT/2008/05/07/Crime-Blooms-in-the-Spring-and-SWAT-Answers-the-Call-for-Crime-Suppression.aspx to http://www.policemag.com/Channels/SWAT/2008/05/07/Crime-Blooms-in-the-Spring-and-SWAT-Answers-the-Call-for-Crime-Suppression.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Under the uniform section, it states: “It was not until 1969 that the patch, incorporating the San Francisco crest of arms, phoenix and city motto was added to the uniform in 1970, adorning both sleeves.”
This very clearly makes no sense, since something distinct can’t happen in both 1969 and 1970.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1000:B161:A7F:8CDE:5E00:A711:DF2B (talk) 12:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniform section illogicality