lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cryptocarya agathophylla

message: Most literature describes this oil as containing methy chavicol as the main ingredient! There is a great deal of confusion between oils of Ravensara and Ravintsara, which is high in cineol. What the analysis posted actually refers to is a mystery to me.  I shall take it down unless someone enters into correspondence with me and persuades me otherwise... Cjsunbird (talk) 16:18, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essential Oil
Talk:The Day Called 'X'

message: Oregonian article Aboutmovies (talk) 08:54, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for expansion/citations 

message: This is a rather simple, but important comment. The title of the film is "The Day Called 'X'", NOT "A Day Called X". I base this on several viewings of the film - i am assuming that the title shown as text over the screaming sirens in the first 1.5 minutes of the film was the intended title of the film's producers. the page should be edited to show the correct title, including the page name and all references to the film in the page.
as a side note this is a very important historical document as it provides evidence of a shift in CD policy following eisenhower's election and appointment of val peterson as director of OCD from "duck and cover" and "our cities must fight" to "run, dig, or die" and staged mass evacuations during the 1950's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmchaffie (talk • contribs) 18:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Page title now fixed. Harumphy (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  film title fail 
Talk:Atlantic Northeast

message: There is no such thing as a "Atlantica independence movement".  The existence of marginal secessionist movements in Vermont and New Hampshire (and by the way, the FSP isn't even a secessionist movement) are irrelevant here; there is no WP:ATT source for an "Atlantica" secessionist movement.--Pharos 04:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Atlantica independence movement"

message: Hartford's population is NOT 895,000; Boston is the largest metro area in the Atlantic Northeast. As of 2010, it's population was 124,755. 98.10.165.90 (talk) 21:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hartford's population 

message: The map should probably include Massachusetts. They're a key part of the region, they're mentioned in the article, and yet at the time I'm writing this, they are not included in the map. Someone needs to fix that.
134.41.125.152 (talk) 01:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massachusetts 

message: I have removed mention of "Dawnland" as there is no sources even coming close to covering this full area.  . Moxy- 14:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed OR Dawnland
Talk:Uruguayan tango

message: Gardel born in Uruguay? Come on!!!
"Carlos Gardel, the giant icon of tango, was born in Tacuarembo, Uruguay in the town of Villa Eden."
This, to say the least, is a very much disputed "fact". Furthermore, I would add that the only people that maintains that Gardel was born in Uruguay are uruguayans. The rest of the world believes he was born in Toulouse, France. As to his national document stating that he was born in Tacuarembó, Uruguay, most scholars maintain that it was a forgery made by Gardel to avoid military service. Besides, I think this article should be merged in tango. Nazroon 04:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed of the article the reference to Carlos Gardel, Wikipedia cannot affirm that he was uruguayan (or frenchman), it wasn't fitting. --Daniel dj87 (talk) 18:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If you show me references about "uruguayan tango" before than 1905, I won't remove this: "towards the beginnings of the 20th century at the same time as Argentine tango" (first apragraph of this article). Till this moment, all the references about Tango were in Argentina, there are muscial scores of tango written in Argentina before than the 20th century. 
What about this??? The Argentine Tango (the real tango, I'm almost sure) "borned" before than "uruguayan tango".
If you want this article say the otherwise, look up references to verify that.
--Edipo yocasta (talk) 09:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You changed the first sentence into a garbled mess. I cannot understand the English. I changed it back. Binksternet (talk) 15:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show me references about "uruguayan tango" before than 1905
Talk:Biscari massacre

message: As I have done a great deal of research into this particular topic, I will attempt to add to the content of this article in the following months.  My goal is to provide an objective and detailed account of the two massacres, backed by extensive and verifiable primary resources.  To that end, any discussion or suggestions concerning my additions is both welcome and encouraged. Justin M. Harris (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Forthcoming Contributions

message: While I assume that prior editors added this material believing it to be true, the lack of inline citations for such a serious accusation that Patton covered up a massacre is something that requires deletion.  This is a case where verifiability is more important than to observe good faith.  I will visit the library and see if this is in the published record.  Any editor can do likewise. Canicattì massacre is a similar article. Sources are likely to refer to both massacres. patsw (talk) 02:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious accusation needs a verifiable cite

message: Patton mentions certifying that the men executed were snipers, apparently referring to a practice of treating snipers differently. An explanation of this would be helpful.Bill (talk) 03:52, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment of Snipers 

message: The actual sentence in the maintext is, "and his seventeen-year-old son Valerio, who was killed by a bayonet shot in his face.[2]", where the cite is to a book I did not try to get access to. The term "bayonet shot" has no standard meaning. One does not shoot bayonets. Andyvphil (talk) 01:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "bayonet shot"?
Talk:Atemoya

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Milomedes

message: Hi, checkuser is welcome! I (Milo) had been trying to figure out a way to force a checkuser on me and Anynobody, and I came up with the idea of both of us voting in AfDs and then declaring we were suspected socks, until someone complained here. We didn't do that, and were working on another non-checkuser idea, but it looks like Gene has solved the problem for us. 
While we're considering this checkuser request let's add to the list: 
*Suspect sock Anynobody; Really Spooky has made this accusation. 
*Suspect sock Sahajhist; an off Wiki poster   has made this accusation. 
*Suspect sock Sfacets; according to Sajahist, the same off-Wiki poster above has previously made an accusation that Sfacets and Sajahist are the same user. 
Hmm, if Milomedes and Parzifal418 are the same person, why would they spend so much time colluding with each other? I thought socks wanted to influence other editors. The writing styles aren't identical, but two well-educated people who like the same kind of music probably would write in a somewhat similar fashion. They would surely have the same POVs about the music they love. 
Really Spooky claims to have noticed stylistic similarities between Milomedes and Anynobody, but I haven't yet spotted them. 
My positions on Wikipedia sockpuppets (socks) are:
# I, Milo, don't have any sockpuppets. 
# I think use of same topic socks suggests an insecure personality who worries that their presented opinions have insufficient influence. On the contrary, I think my opinions have adequate influence, and I would be surprised if editors who know me, would say I lack confidence in my opinions.
# Why would I want any socks, when I want credit for everything I write on talk pages? I wouldn't, because socks dilute credit. 
# Why would I risk having any socks when long-term tendentious editors like Gene Poole use the accusation for harrassment when they get routinely reverted by more than one editor? I wouldn't.
# Why would two editors and an off-net reader suddenly accuse me of socks in less than a month? Hehe, I must be more important than I thought. If I'm all that important, I sure don't need socks!
# Why would I try to use socks when I thought my posts were uniquely distinguishable? Oops, maybe they're not as unique as I thought, but I did think that up until I was confused with Anynobody! :)
Milo 03:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Magnolia tripetala

message: These grow wild though not common in central New Jersey in the Morristown area. One grew at our neighbor's house when I was a child. I transplanted a number of seedlings from the wild to our property as I thought them exotic and fascinating. They all survived and flourished with no care at all. While the odor of the flowers is unpleasant, it is not overwhelming and cannot be detected from more than a few feet away.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.167.140.70 (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Native range correct? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Isoetid (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Dendrology BIOL 3509

message: I have added multiple new headers including Taxonomy, Distribution and Habitat, Diseases, Conservation, and Ecology. Added Content under each of these headers as well as additional content to sections such as Uses and Description. Will not be making more edits Slezkin (talk) 17:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major header and content additions
Talk:Magnolia macrophylla

message: The intro paragraph claims the largest leaf in the Americas, but I find this hard to believe compared to some Anthurium in the tropics with 5 ft+ leaves. The claim is unsourced. 69.169.6.249 (talk) 18:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest leaf in the Americas?
Talk:Magnolia sieboldii

message: 5-10 meters?  What the hell is that?--24.177.6.38 (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: To say that Americans don't use the metric system is rather simplistic. Have a look at the entries in the Flora of North America, e.g. for the impeccably American Magnolia sieboldii. Scientists everywhere use the metric system. However, units should be converted, e.g. using , not just for Americans, but for elderly Britons, like me, who grew up with yards, feet and inches. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Metric System
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/FarmSanctuary

message: ::FWIW, I can vouch that whatever else GingerGin might have done, she's *not* a sock of Farm Sanctuary. Schmucky, I'm a bit uncomfortable with this. Seems like you're saying they are probably socks because they're disruptive, and you're making the RFCU on all these people just in case some might be socks of one another. I thought one needed much more solid grounds to make such a request (similarity in editing styles, editing times, in addition to the obviously shared viewpoint).--Ramdrake 00:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I put Ginger in a separate heading because I assume she is her own self as an editor, who may be running socks.  I don't like the revert counting and use of IPs makes it look like she wants to avoid her own username on some edits. SchmuckyTheCat 04:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The other editors are clearly linked by editing styles and times, etc.  There is no doubt to me that Farm Sanctuary is telling employees and volunteers to come edit their article here. SchmuckyTheCat 04:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've struck Ginger, I figured she was a separate case.  The use of the IPs brought her close to 3RR but never over. Ginger, please make sure you are logged in.  I stand by the rst of it. SchmuckyTheCat 05:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm a CCF plant, no I'm an Islam fanatic, no, I'm a Islam hating jew, no, I'm a Chinese communist.  I've been on Wikipedia a long time, I've been called a lot of things.  SchmuckyTheCat 15:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Piper excelsum

message: Boiled tea of Kawa Kawa is known to be a potent aphrodisiac, enhancing endurance, libido and even discomfort due to aching muscles. This maybe a combination effect from the eugenol (upwards of 70% of the essential oil), perhaps piperine(sp?) components and even maybe something analogous to the kava lactones. 
Kawa kawa is colloquially called New Zealand Kava.
Glass men shine (talk) 22:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kawa Kawa and its stimulatory actions

message: My understanding is that only one variety (excelsum?) is commonly full of insect holes and that is the one that is safe to consume because the hole-free variety (majus?) is toxic to insects and humans. But I don't have a reference --Hugh7 (talk) 06:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Insect holes

message: If this article is meant to be about Kawakawa then perhaps it should be modified and renamed to be Piper excelsum subsp. excelsum MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kawakawa...
Talk:Aristolochia littoralis

message: Most of the plant/tree pages I've been reading have the information on where the plant/tree is native and its distribution, including if it's recognised as an invasive species, in the introductory paragraph.
May I suggest for consistency that the information from the "distribution" section be moved to the introductory paragraph.
Tzali (talk) 13:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion moving information from distribution to introductory paragraph
Talk:Aristolochia rotunda

message: It's not a coincidence that this plant shares so many common names with Blitum bonus-henricus. It looks to me like someone, somewhere, got this smearwort confused with the other smearwort, and combined the common names for both. Especially telling is "mercury goosefoot": "goosefoot" is very specific to the genus Chenopodium and its relatives. As for "mercury", it's explained at Mercurialis perennis (but not at Blitum bonus-henricus), that Blitum bonus-henricus is the original mercury, and Mercurialis perennis is called "dog's mercury" because it resembles Blitum bonus-henricus, but is poisonous. The only common names that belong here are "smearwort" and "round-leaved birthwort". The others should be removed, since they create the potential for this poisonous, carcinogenic plant to be confused with a harmless source of nutritious greens. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a reference showing common names for Blitum bonus-henricus: Grieve's Modern Herbal.Chuck Entz (talk) 23:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's worse than I thought: from this edit, it's apparent that the article creator took their information from the html version of the reference I just cited at www.botanical.com, which means that any content remaining from the original edit is almost certainly wrong. This article has been incrementally edited to reflect the real Aristolochia rotunda, but there's still a great deal of the original material subtly intertwined with the new in ways that are going to be hard to tease out. Yikes! Chuck Entz (talk) 02:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. I've worked on cleaning the mess up. Plantdrew (talk) 16:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common names
Talk:Mii

message: Perhaps it'd be interesting to add a section about the Mii's development? Apparently the idea came from a Japanese Nintendo DS game called Tomodachi [Friend] Collection.
:I remember hearing about how, going back to the days of the NES, Nintendo wanted to incorporate user-customizable avatars within their systems, however, the hardware available back then obviously wasn't able to handle things like that. Probably the earliest attempt at such avatars would probably have to be one of the N64 Disk Drive games, can't remember the name off the top of my head. MightyArms (talk) 15:15, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mii development 

message: Do they all have very small noses and mouths, or is :File:Mii Maker for Nintendo Switch screenshot.jpg a bad example to use? --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miis on the Switch
Talk:Magician Among the Spirits

message: I am proposing moving this page and correcting the capitalization.  Among is apparently a preposition, and according to WP:ALBUM, these should not be capitalized in the middle of a title.  Objections, agreements? --Evil1987
Since there have been no objections, I went ahead with the move. --Evil1987 17:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging again.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed page move - [[Magician among the Spirits]] 
Talk:Acorus americanus

message: It's disappointing that WP offers this under "Uses". No cite and pitifully non-specific. 49.181.45.111 (talk) 10:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This plant was used extensively by Native Americans and early European settlers. 
Talk:Alismatales

message: Some sources seem to list Alismales as an order, described as "aquatic monocotyledonous herbaceous plants."  The 1974 Encyclopedia Britannica seems to list a macropedia article on the same name, although I have not been able to locate a copy of the text.  Is Alismatales a synonym for Alismales, or is there some reorganization going on?  It might be good to clarify, if relevant.  Thoughts?  --TeaDrinker (talk) 23:00, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Alismales 

message: It had been suggest at the top of the article that the Spanish version -- far more extensive than here --  be translated and material incorporated in this English version. If anyone is up to the task, why not go for it.  Meanwhile there are other sources for diagnostic information. J.H.McDonnell (talk) 20:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation suggestion

message: This line from the "Description" section appears to contain a logical flaw:
"Both marine and freshwater forms include those with staminate flowers that detach from the parent plant and float to the surface where they become pollinated."
Since the staminate flowers are male pollen bearers, they cannot BE pollinated, they SUPPLY the pollen for pollinating female floral parts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmeiss (talk • contribs) 13:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logical error 

message: The term is nearly nearly synonymous if not wholly included in this order. Should we make Helobiae redirect here?--Draco ignoramus sophomoricus (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Helobiae
Talk:Amorphophallus

message: Hi everyone,
I'm sorry because I might have missed some of the guidelines which might be required, please tell me if I forgot any, thanks.
Anyway, I just wanted to tell you guys that there are 2 articles which have different titles which talk about the same subject, these two articles are Amorphophallus (which is this article) and Titan arum, I think that they should both be joined together into one article.
 Thanks, 
 Cpt Adham (talk) 19:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Amorphophallus describes the genus, while Titan arum describes a specific species.  JoJan (talk) 19:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Just leave it as it is.  JoJan (talk) 15:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated article 

message: If you search for konjac you will find at least one member of this genus is now a fad food. One web page with a title of "Miracle Noodle - Konjac Flour" sells konjac flour, and my wife picked up noodles in the store using the flour. 24.91.82.29 (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than "famine foods" 
Talk:Vallisneria

message: The taxonomy of Vallisneria is complicated and many cultivated (hybrids ?) forms are available in the aquarium trade, of doubtful status. I have followed what seems to be the general consensus in delimiting the different species but I suspect that a thorough revision of this genus is overdue and will produce a number of changes in the future Hermeswiki 15:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Phyllis Love

message: I have rewritten the "Personal life" section after discovering that it was identical to material in her obituary on the Playbill web site. The material had an IMDB citation; I assume that whoever wrote the IMDB material took it from the Playbill page. I also rewrote the sentence about her high school teaching, which was identical to a sentence in the Playbill obituary. Eddie Blick (talk) 03:57, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elimination of plagiarized material 
Talk:Sagittaria sagittifolia

message: Looks like there is quite a lot of confusion between Sagittaria trifolia and Sagittaria sagittifolia and most of the text of this article seems to be actually about the former. There seem to be a lot of confusing synonyms of either that use either name, but if I read it right, this article essentially conflated the two (for example by saying it's native both to Ireland and to Japan).
This article is supposed to be about S. sagittifolia, the species native to Europe, Caucasus, and northern Asia, but not India, China, or Japan. Japanese Wikipedia doesn't even have an article about this one at the moment (despite of what Wikidata says about it; interwiki link is wrong). It's referred to as  () in Japanese and  (; and a number of other names) in Chinese (that is by adding an epithet Western or European to the genus name, resp.  and ).
On the other hand S. trifolia is widely known in East Asia. Chinese calls it  (), and Japanese Wikipedia has two separate articles about it:  () about the species S. trifolia, and  () about its edible cultivated variety usually referred to as S. trifolia var. edulis or S. sagittifolia var. edulis (sic) although currently Japanese Wikipedia gives a cultivar name Sagittaria trifolia 'Caerulea'. Whatever the correct way to call it, these are varieties of the S. trifolia not S. sagittifolia according to all the external links here, if I read them right.
Could someone more familiar with the topic confirm that and perhaps help fixing it? –MwGamera (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sagittaria trifolia
Talk:Wolffia

message: Doesn't Wolffia globosa have the smallest flower in the world? (124.171.168.49 (talk) 08:14, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smallest flower in world 

message: Doesn't Wolffia globosa have the smallest flower in the world? 124.171.168.49 (talk) 08:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smallest flower in world 

message: I observed that our Muscovy Ducks eat watermeal off our pond. That was the reason we got the fledglings. The ducks are a great option in keeping the water and area clean. We are hopeful that by next Spring our pond will have no or at least very little watermeal. SAUMulerider (talk) 16:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pond Weed Control