lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Satellite radio

message: Does it seem like there's a lot of XM/Sirius content on this page that ought to be on their respective pages? It seems to me that this article ought to be an abstract, leaving the specifics of each operator to their respective articles. -- TomXP411[Talk] 05:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  XM/Sirius comparisons 

message: The article says satellite radio started in 1999 but St.GIGA was doing satellite radio in the early 90s before transitioning to supporting Nintendo's Satellaview. So is this an earlier instance or is there a difference between what they did and the things listed in this article? 
--Jccalhoun (talk) 22:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I had the same question when I saw this article.  I've added a "contradicts others" template linked to this discussion.  kcowolf (talk) 01:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Satellite Radio?  

message: What happens after death 71.73.39.224 (talk) 21:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Baldwin II of Jerusalem

message: contrary to some unfounded beliefs, Baldwin II was not a brother of Baldwin I. Sources state very clearly that at death of Baldwin I, his only remaining brother, count Eustace III of Boulogne was offered the royal crown - but he never arrived to obtain it, possibly dying when travelling, or declined the offer. Baldwin II was the closest relative of Baldwin I present in Syria-Palestine at that time, and he received finally the vacant crown. (Already the fact that both guys were "Baldwin" should remind anyone that they should not be thought as brothers, as very usually brothers do not share the only first name.) 217.140.193.123 05:56, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Who ever said they were brothers? Adam Bishop 14:50, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  relation with predecessor 

message: I tried using the existing picture of Baldwin II in the royalty box, but couldn't get it to size at all well. If you know more about this stuff than me, or have a good free-use picture please add it to improve the box.
I'll be adding royalty boxes for the whole lineage, so don't worry that im giving undue precedence here, jus need a few days :)
Tefalstar (talk) 17:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: My sources say that Baldwin's invasion of Damascus was pushed back in 1126 by Toghtekin, who actually died in 1128. So Baldwin could not carry it out in 1129 as written before. --Attilios (talk) 09:23, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Invasion of Damascus in 1126

message: Hi  Apologies for taking so long on this. Do let me know if you have queries on any of my edits. Some things which I have noticed that are not copy edit issues but which you may wish to look at:
*The lead seems to end part way through Baldwin's career. Eg, no mention of the Battle of Azaz or of Fulk or of Baldwin's death.
*There is a lot of duplicate Wikilinking. I counted four dups just in the lead.
*There may be no reliable source for this, but did Baldwin not fight with Godfrey at the Battle of Dorylaeum?
A fine article. I especially liked the dense referencing.
Gog the Mild (talk) 14:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you for your comprehensive copyedit. I highly appreciate your work. I expanded the lead and deleted the duplicated wikilinks . I cannot remember that sources refer to his role in the battle, but I try to check it. Borsoka (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit
Talk:Coloane

message: In deed, all the romanized name of Macau place is not pinyin. The name of 竹灣 in romanized alphabet is Choc Wan. The name of 黑沙海灘 is Hac Sa Beach. There is no 黑沙灣 because 黑沙灣 is easily confused with 黑沙環 in peninsular Macau. I hope the original editor of Coloane can correct the above things. thank you--HeiChon~XiJun 19:16:58, 2005-07-29 (UTC)
環 and 灣 is the same Chinese at least in Macau. 環 is bay not ring. Coloane in Chinese : 鹽灶灣, 過路灣, 過路環, 路灣, 路環  (http://www.macaudata.com/macaubook/book069/html/03001.htm).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.175.117.66 (talk) 08:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of 竹灣Zhu Bay and 黑沙Hac Sa 

message: I have merged the Coloane Village article into this one. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 17:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article merged
Talk:Marcian Hoff

message: The following line was added by 152.163.100.5.  It is not valid English, has no context, and is not sourced.
     He won a competition when he was 15 to Washington DC. 
Sheldrake 21:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  competition at age 15 
Talk:Strategic Organizing Center

message: At the founding convention, the orgainzation officially became the Change to Win Federation.  I think that probably merits a name change for this article with a redirection from "Change to Win Coaltion." meyerlondon
:-Good call.  We'll also have to go through the affiliate pages to change to name there, and fix the double-redirect.  Fcendejas 23:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: It looks like this article has been accumulating dust. The membership numbers hadn't been updated in 3 years, the article still listed Hansen of UFCW as president, and the article still lists Wal-Mart, Smithfield, and CVS as campaigns CtW is spearheading (these are all UFCW campaigns, and of course UFCW has since left CtW presumably taking these campaigns with it). Furthermore, in the "campaigns" area, none of these campaigns are cited. Especially given the recent strikes by west coast port truck drivers, the article would probably benefit from elaboration on these current organizing campaigns rather than having the article give so much weight to the internal politics and hearsay gossip of the labor movement. I also question if the "Possible Reunification with AFL-CIO" section is warranted or if it should be deleted; it's about a developing story from six years ago that clearly never panned out. The talks should be covered to some degree (possibly in a consolidated "History" section), but I don't think this outdated news piece deserves an entire section.
Au166 (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In need of major updates 

message: According to the organization, it has changed its name to the Strategic Organizing Center (SOC) from Change to Win.
https://twitter.com/change2win?lang=en
https://thesoc.org/
-Srbsf7 (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change [2] 

message: This organization has seriously decreased in relevance due to poor management. Just look at the LM2s and check out the turnover. Very few have remained and appear to benefit disproportionately from the worker dues used to fund this org. 2600:1010:A002:21B0:65DF:197E:671F:82D3 (talk) 05:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues
Talk:A. W. Tozer

message: Shouldn't all these quotes be moved to Wikiquote ? DFH 17:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes from Tozer 

message: Anyone know which institutions awarded these to Tozer? DFH 18:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honorary doctorates? 

message: Need to add a first edition date and the publisher for each of the listed works. Once all these dates are known, then the list could be sorted into date order.  DFH 18:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication details 

message: Anyone have a suitable digital image portrait of Tozer that they would be prepared to upload? DFH 18:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Tozer? 

message: "Four thumbs up!"  --Mdoc7 04:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Book critic review"

message: Hello Wikifriends — I reverted a lengthy section of edits to follow the "WP:NAMES" guidelines for biography. Avoid lengthy descriptions of background detail and early life. Please discuss here if you note important details to early life that need to be incorporated.
:I don't feel that my descriptions qualify as "lengthy." The man is worthy of more than three sentences on his early life. A few paragraphs is not excessive.  DrakoKajLupo (talk) 00:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of lengthy additions 

message: Source number 11 includes a downloadable pdf of a biography of Tozer ("The Life of A.W. Tozer: In Pursuit of God"). This pdf does not come from the site of the publisher or the author and I am wondering is this is a legal copy, since the book is also still sold on Amazon. Liever (talk) 17:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are right to suspect that it isn't a legal copy. In that case we shouldn't be linking to it - see WP:COPYLINK. Tacyarg (talk) 20:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it was added in this diff by , who will hopefully see this ping and update about whether this is non-free text. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 20:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, fair enough. I have unlinked it just to be on the safe side. The ref is still good, of course. StAnselm (talk) 23:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Tozer biography 

message: What God love is 2602:306:334C:B430:EC90:D5D2:15B9:67DC (talk) 15:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  God
Talk:Lead (electronics)

message: ----
attention
:{{Mergeto|This STUB article should, perhaps, be merged with the article headed Wire? QUITTNER 142.150.49.166 19:21, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no one has replied to this in a very long time, and the article is still here.  Good!  This is a very different article from wire, as wire is a generic interconnect, usually on a large (by microelectronics standards) scale.  A lead is attached to a specific electrical component (which I believe is clear in the article. Yanroy 21:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paul Harris (magician)

message: Here we go again. I don't think it is a point of view if you have actually worked and been taught by Paul in a closed session and one on one. You learn to know what he is like. Seems like I just can't win. Big deal! User talk:Kazuba 29 Jul 2005
:the content you added had no reference to anyone who actually worked with him, it only provided a Point of View  with no justification.   If you are the actual person who worked with him, why not rewrite it along the lines of "According to one of his past students..." or if you know a specific person who has expressed these ideas, maybe something like "Jane Doe said that..."    That help?  Eclipsed 19:38, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi Eclipsed.

message: okay - you can als see i made changes as indicated. i will remove the POV hand if no further objections. Tiksustoo 16:47, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes made. remove POV alert? 

message: looks like only me editing. i shoud be surprised but im not. looked like a load of free commercial for Harris' new material available for magicians - so I removed the mention. POV hand stands until someone else comes utp witht the goods. dont realy get a asence that this guy is a magician - he just inventsn effects. is that a liveing? and why no third party validation? Tiksustoo 23:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  no. POV alert stays
Talk:Monster Movie (Can album)

message: The compilations Delay 1968 and Unlimited Edition have their own pages yet they have not been included in the album chronology... not sure how I should go about doing this. (unsigned)
:They're in there. The album chronology goes in order of albums as they were released, not as they were recorded. Morganfitzp (talk) 23:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology
Talk:Tetrads in general relativity

message: Hi, MPatel,
I propose a name change for the following reasons:
*"tetrad" is often used to refer to NP tetrad (two real null vectors and one pair of complex conjugate vectors), 
*"frame" and "coframe" are dual pairs just like "vector" and "covector", which reduces the burden upon the memory of the student,
*the term "frame field" helps students remember that these are vector fields.
I changed the link from the "Exact solutions" article to a new article I started called "frame fields in general relativity", and plan a companion article on "coframe fields in general relativity".  Both articles will point out that these are very special cases of more general concepts with are valid for any psuedo-Riemannian manifold, and I plan to link them with future articles on congruences and kinematical quantities like the expansion tensor, shear tensor, and vorticity vector.---CH  (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi CH. I've just come from the frame fields in general relativity article. Now that that article is well and truly on it's way, I suppose this article can be deleted. --Mpatel 10:32, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site

message: This article is based on text from a National Park Service page (). "Information presented on this website, unless otherwise indicated , is considered in the public domain."  Rl 19:59, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SqueakBox

message: too many trolls not worth the hassle of being criticised by kids and sockpuppets, SqueakBox 20:04, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
I don't think this page should be speedied. Regardless of "kids" and sockpuppets, it's an important record and should be kept. android79 20:17, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
:SqueakBox, If I might point this out, technically you didn't decline the nomination, what happened is that you have withdrawn your candidacy, which is your prerrogative.  But so that the record is accurate, it would be better if you corrected your note.  If I may suggest, you could restore your acceptance post, and right under it, you can use your present text, but replacing the first sentence ("Not accepted") with "Withdrawn".  If a candidacy is withdrawn, no one will post in it anymore.But are you sure you want to give up so soon?  I mean, this is just the first day, the RfA lasts a 7-day period.  A lot can happen in this time.  If sockpuppets, vandals and trolls are attempting to disturb your RfA, serious users who vote usually perceive that as an indication that the nominee is doing something right.  The best thing you can do is not be all-out confrontational when they try to provoke you.  If an account with two edits to its credit posts here to oppose you for no apparent reason, make a note to it under the vote.  Serious voters will look into it and will be likely to support you.  Anyways, it's your call.  Regards, Redux 21:28, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers for the comment. The whole process just leaves me feeling upset. I don't need public humiliation, which is what I feel this was degenerating into. By all means change the text to say I withdrew, SqueakBox 21:31, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
That looks fine. Shame really but I find wikipedia toos stressful. It intrudes too much into my working life already, and I just don't need nasty criticisms and rascism accusations. See my partner and I. Too much trolling, and it seems the Rfadmin process is putting people off even editing, ie they leave. I have seen 2 people leave after failed admin requests. I don't wish to be so thoroughly disgusted with wikipedia that I leave. IMO both Vizcarra and admin Andres were trolling and Aule was a very Spanish sounding sockpuppet. "My edits on Batpedia" I say sarcastically and with a tinge of cynicism, SqueakBox 22:06, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
Well I have asked for a sockpuppet check on User:Aule. I am very offended about accusations of rascist editing, and if this user is a sockpuppet I will take appropriate wikipedia action, SqueakBox 23:14, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
##:Reply: I am sorry, but I see calling someone a "nazi troll", discriminating against certain races, and calling people "Fundamentalist Christian anime-obsessed crack-addicted termite-farming leprechauns who are physically incapable of telling a lie" all as racism. However, I do appreciate how you welcomed me to Wiki with your nice message even after I opposed you on here. Props for that. --Aule 03:28, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:CIDNP

message: An early paragraph in this article describes the polarisation method as "Because the magnetic moment of an electron is more than 600x that of a proton, the spins of many protons are polarized beyond the usual thermal Boltzmann distribution." I thought the polarisation occurred because some nuclear spins favour the triplet recombination while others allow the radicals to wander off and react elsewhere. This is what causes the non-Boltzmann distribution of proton spins. The electrons are not changing the spins of the protons. I am an ex-Cidnipper from 1972. JMcC (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Jungle Carbine

message: This is patently false, whatever the source, as any physics student can tell you. A shorter barrel results in lower muzzle velocity, which again reduces recoil. Increased recoil is entirely caused by reduced weight.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asgrrr (talk • contribs) 21:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Increased recoil due to shorter barrel

message: just a suggestion - but shouldn't this be moved in with the rest of the Lee-Enfield/SMLE article? TSR2 20:25, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite so. The Carbine was intended for the dense jungles of the Far East where the jungle canopy can make it almost dark at mid-day and where the eyes become adjusted to the low light.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.247.9 (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: New Zealanders used the jungle carbine in the vietnam war. i'm told that it could use many types of ammunition because the NZers were so badly equipped they needed to use Austrailian, American, and even NVA ammo! is this true?
--Waxi skanki 10:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  on scavenging ammunition 

message: I have a jungle carbine that is chambered in 308, is this original?, as the stampings are original and not overstriked.
The markings are on the right side receiver band under bolt.
It states "RIFLE 7.62mm2A1, RFI 1966" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.208.90.161 (talk) 03:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  jungle carbine chambered in 308 

message: I've begun a copyedit and reference addition to try and boost the article up some more; I think it was missing something previously. Commander Zulu (talk) 12:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit
Talk:Perosi

message: creater wrote: "This article was written by Leonardo Ciampa on 29 July 2005. It is not under copyright; i.e., it is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reproduced in any fashion, provided that the name of Mr. Ciampa is given due credit."     If it is in the public domain, then Leonarda Ciampa has given up ALL rights to the content.  There is no exception.   Wikipedia users can, and probably will, remove the name from this page.  If Mr. Ciampa wishes to retain credit on the article, then Public Domain licensing is the incorrect choice.  Some type of With-Attribution licensing would be more appropriate. Eclipsed 20:27, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain, no exceptions
Talk:Daniel Lanois

message: Suggest adding a note that Daniel's song "Jolie Louise" was used in the TV Series "Northern Exposure" (1991 - 1995), and is included in the CD from the series. Tony (talk) 02:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to Jolie Louise in Northern Exposure

message: Hi, wondering if we can get some info on his New Orleans period. Otterswimshome  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.10.131 (talk) 21:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Orleans?

message: In the discography, an album is listed named "Waves of Air". Does this Album really exist? I could't find any useful information about it on the Web. Even discogs.com does not list it. Can anyone confirm this album's existence? --Mipani (talk) 19:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album "Waves of Air"
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Everyking 2/Mentorship

message: Everyking has suggested that he might be amenable to an extension of his mentorship to cover issues related to civility and personal attacks on WP:AN and its subpages (especially WP:AN/I), and his comments on the actions of other admins.
The issue is being discussed–in a very preliminary way–at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Everyking 3.  Comments and thoughts from his mentors would be very much appreciated there.  TenOfAllTrades(talk) 20:40, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Everyking 3 RFArb
Talk:White pudding

message: There’s a slight disconnect here. The article defines white pudding as: “pork meat and fat, suet, bread, and oatmeal.” But the version given as suitable for vegetarians merely substitutes vegetable fat for animal fat — leaving the pork meat and suet just lying there for unsuspecting vegetarians.
:I gather it's the Scottish version that can be suitable. Obviously the Irish one never would be. I've tried to make this clearer. -- Blorg 08:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly the wrong label? If you bought it from a small family business, then it is more likely that the labels for black and white puddings could be mixed up. I just checked my white pudding from 'Shaw Meats' and there were no ingredients listed at all. I'm e-mailing them now to ask what is in them.
Shouldn't this be an offal dish rather than meat dish? (no pun intended - I quite like both Scottish and Irish versions)
----
There is no pork meat in the Scottish version of white pudding at all. Can't say I've ever tried the Irish version. The Scottish recipe only contains oats, animal fat, onions and spices. In the past it was often steamed like haggis and not fried in oil. The fat is usually in the form of beef suet, however I'm sure vegetarian suet could be substituted. In Scotland this would not qualify as a dish made from offal whereas haggis would.--62.249.233.80 16:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Have you ever heard of Groat Pudding? 
Same ingredients and texture as White Pudding, but includes a handful of whole barley?
Very Nice. (Bought them in Plymouth's Pannier Market, the Butcher said they were locally made.)
Slightly more messy to cook, as the whole Barley tends to pop all 'oller the place when it's fryin'!
They're real Brammer (Very Nice) for a Janner' Breakfast!
TTFN! Chunner (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groat Pudding 

message: someone's added a 'why' superscript (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_clarify) to the bit about prior to around 1990, brain matter being used as a binding agent.  surely that's because of the mad cow disease awareness that kicked in around then. but i have no citation for that and don't feel ilke getting involved.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cramyourspam (talk • contribs) 02:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Why?"  Eh? 

message: Does the photo actually show black and/or white pudding? It appears to be eggs, beans, mushrooms, pork and "bubbles and squeek" (according to the caption of the photo).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.15.29.155 (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: As I was checking the references in this article, I noticed that most do not redirect anywhere, so I want to make sure that this is a real problem in the article before removing these links.
If you see this, let me know or simply fix the dead links, and/or add a suitable template.
Thank you.
Fenharrow (talk) 03:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The links don't redirect anywhere