lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Plural quantification

message: I've tagged this article as containing too much jargon. For example:
*"Kaplan proves that it is nonfirstorderizable by showing its second-order translation to be true in every nonstandard model of arithmetic but false in every standard one."
*"Boolos argued that 2nd-order monadic existential quantification may be systematically interpreted in terms of plural existential quantification, and that, therefore, 2nd-order monadic existential quantification is 'ontologically innocent'".
Whaaaaaaaaatttt? Somebody who understands this stuff (I've used most of the preceding words, but have hardly any clue what they might mean in combination) needs to "tone it down" for idiots like me. :-P Cosmic Latte (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jargon 

message: If x is a singular variable symbol and \bar{y} is a plural variable symbol, then x \prec \bar{y} is a sentence (where ≺ is usually interpretted as the relation "is one of")
 -- I added the parenthetical above, but I am actually not well versed in the subject and so someone with more familiarity should probably review that change and add a more appropriate clarification if this one is not correct.  I based my understanding on: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plural-quant/  -- Thanks, LordBrain (forgot password)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.110.50.184 (talk) 08:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request review
Talk:Oneida Limited

message: This really shouldn't be a redirect, it's an existing company, and the sentence at Oneida Society isn't sufficient coverage. - cohesion 01:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Can someone please clean up this article - I've never heard of this company - can't decide if it reads like an advert or not.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by  FengRail  (talk • contribs)  19:06, 4 April 2009‎ (UTC)
:I cleaned it up. It is notable -- they are a major player in the area of high-end flatware and are also notable because of the company's rather odd origins, but it read like a sales brochure. It still needs work, so I invite anyone reading this to jump in and improve the article. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The article mentions the acquisition of a manufacturing company that built army trucks, aircraft survival kits, and even jet engine parts. This was the Rex-Watson Corporation, successor of the Watson Truck Corp., a small manufacturer of trucks in Canastota, and in trouble when taken over in 1943. Rex-Watson did not offer own trucks, but school bus bodies. The company was renamed the Oneida Ltd. Canastota Division, Oneida Products Corp. (1946) and was sold to Henney Motors, a well-known coachbuilder and manufacturer of ambulances and hearses in 1952, when it became Oneida Products Division, Henney Motor Co. Inc. until 1960. It was then acquired by Marmon-Herrington, and later belonged to National Union Electric Corp. (1960-1967), and Jefferson-Travis Inc., until 1970 (Champion motor homes). 1. 2 The Henney Kilowatt Electric of 1960 was assembled at Oneida School Bus. --Chief tin cloud (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rex-Watson and Oneida School Bus
Talk:List of WiiWare games

message: Is it possible that since we have a North American and PAL wiiware secion, we should have a Japanese Wiiware section? This is just all known Wiiware games.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keetoman (talk • contribs) 00:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese section of Wiiware? 

message: If Virtual Console games recieved a count, this one should too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keetoman (talk • contribs) 00:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiiware game count please? 

message: Quality is very much a concern with downloadable titles. Would anyone be offended if I added a Metacritic column to the table with the scores of each title?--LostOverThere (talk) 02:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Metacritic Scores?
Talk:Truth condition

message: The article doesn't really explain much about truth conditions and theories and it's original use in philosophy now used in a branch of linguistics, semantics. I needed a definition of truth theory and so I cited a source that better explained it. Ntijerina (talk) 08:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

message: Hello there! I'm not quite sure which person is the sandbox indicated for this article, but I will leave it on the talk page for now my peer review edit. The changes that I would make to the article would be that there are a couple of syntactical mistakes with the article. For example the following sentence: "One popular argument for this view is that some sentences are necessarily true — that is, they are true whatever happens to obtain." The latter half of that statement is a little at odd's wit for me. It doesn't really make sense, I need some clarity here as far as what the author is trying to say here. The, 'that is, they are true whatever happens to obtain" is pretty meaningless reading it. Another syntactical problem would be the following sentence within the article: "All such sentences have the same truth conditions, but arguably do not thereby have the same meaning." Such sentences is pretty vague here, I would like to have a clearer explanation as to what kind of sentences the author is referring to. But also "but arguably do not thereby have the same meaning" does not make any sense. I need this to be corrected. Other than that, everything is pretty neutral, conveys direct information for a general audience but does require some more important references using 'truth condition'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ntijerina (talk • contribs) 02:33, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review  

message: The article is not well-developed. Both content and structure should be improved. A Table of Content must be added. Major sections with subheadings should be included. More reliable sources should be cited to support the content and provide various viewpoints on the topic. Grammatical errors should be taken into consideration. Examples should be pointed out clearly for readers to follow. Some visual aids can be added to enhance understanding.--Thaonhiphan (talk) 17:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation 

message: This article needs a lot. For starters, I think adding more examples would be helpful to the reader. Referencing more sources is a good place to start. There should also be more sections and a table of contents. The sections can provide more information about the history of truth conditions for example. Semantics and Pragmatics can be its own section and maybe adding a section about truth conditions in other subjects besides linguistics, like philosophy, can offer a better explanation of truth conditions. Separating the part where it explains truth conditions and where it shows an example would also be a good idea.  Sampoidk (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Talk:Amelia Academy

message: Note that there was a now-defunct school, also called the Amelia Academy, located in Amelia county during the 19th century, see here:
*
This school had a number of famous graduates and probably deserves an article, although I can't find sufficient sources to write one right now.  It's important to note in searching for information that the school that this article is about was founded in 1964 as a segregation academy, and is not the same school at all.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 18:52, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  two distinct schools of this name. 

message: I am in no way trying to give an unbalanced view of this school by adding only information about its status as a segregation academy.  I would be thrilled if anyone could find other stuff to put it, but it seems that being a segregation academy is the only thing that this school is notable for.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  appearance of undue weight
Talk:Freedom Movement of Iran

message: Why does this say ideology: Wahabbism? This is an obvious piece of vandalism.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.195.166.36 (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:60558 Echeclus

message: Why does this body have the name of a Trojan warrior if it's a Centaur? kwami 02:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Mary J. Safford

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Only one source is referenced, and the web page is no longer available, nor does it appear in the Wayback archive. So I'm going to use different sources and do a little rewriting. Just a heads up. --MopTop (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Mary Jane Safford currently has 79 books listed at Project Gutenberg, mostly historical fiction. She is the translator, from German to English, for all of these. The article mentions that she spoke German, but it does not mention her translation work. I've begun to wonder if this article  in fact describes the same Mary Jane Safford as the translator. The dates seem about right, but it is odd that I cannot find more information about this phase of her life. Anthon.Eff (talk) 15:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translator
File talk:Glendale 20000ft vicinity.jpg

message: "Notice the over-development and lack of public, open spaces in the city of Glendale, typical of many Los Angeles suburbs."
Your picture shows the open spaces of Griffith Park (left side), the Verdugo Mountains Open Space Preserve (top), and Silver Lake Park (bottom), not to mention the cemetery in center. Further, the "over-development", by which I assume you mean the office towers and tightly-packed apartment buildings centered around a vibrant multi-axial pedestrian shopping district and mall, is actually the opposite of sprawl. There is sprawl around Los Angeles, but a this picture doesn't show it. EmergentProperty 02:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Sprawl
Talk:Shapleigh, Maine

message: I had to rewrite the General Information, and the History pages to meet Wikipedia's standards. I added a little more info on other sections. X, the Nerd X, the Nerd 02:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates

message: The history section should now be fully cited and verified. Some statements had to be removed, because I wasn't able to verify those points. If there were any issues made by me, I apologize for making them. Thanks Geo g guy (talk) 06:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section 

message: Hello. I added the Maine Genealogy external link, because it contained vital information about Shapleigh, Maine. The Epodunk link was removed, because this site is defunct and the link is a dead link. The same was for the Shapleigh Library link. Library information can be found on the town's website. These actions were intended to keep this particular article up to date on its vital information. I apologize if any action was wrong. Geo g guy (talk) 06:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maine Genealogy Link
Talk:Shotgun proteomics

message: Hi, 
I think that shotgun is the same as bottom-up proteomics. I'm not an expert but by just looking at the description of the two they look similar to me. If they're the same thing then it's better to merge the articles. If they're diffrent then it'd be really hepful to explain the diffrence b/w the two.
In reply to previous 
I found the below in a journal article and included in the article:
"Shotgun proteomics refers to the use of bottom-up proteomics techniques in which the protein content in a biological sample mixture is digested prior to separation and mass spectrometry analysis."--Dive7 0 (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

message: This has been discussed a little bit on other topics, but seems reiterating:
This page seems to be the same topic (differently stated/named differently), from these pages:
* Bottom-up proteomics
* Peptide mass fingerprinting
They should be merged for clarity? Photocyte (talk) 15:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy with other pages
Talk:Jeff Locke (baseball)

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "firstinning" :
** [see above]
** First Inning : Jeffrey Locke
* "cds2" :
** [see above]
** http://cds-gw.rf.ncia.net:3080/cdsarch/searchpublic/story.lasso?-KeyValue=42041&-Token.Action=SEARCH
DumZiBoT (talk) 01:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 
Talk:Charles Floyd (explorer)

message: I've added info for the Sergeant Floyd Monument, to what was already there.  Now it is getting awkward, perhaps it would be better to separate into two articles, one a biography of the explorer and one about the monument site, a National Historic Landmark.  Each article would mention the other of course. It's not urgent though. doncram 03:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate articles for the explorer and for the monument?
Talk:John Pory

message: John Pory took his Bachelor's and Master's degrees from Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge. Is there any monument to him there which can be photographed and used to illustrate this article? Cheers, Jacklee 22:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorial to John Pory at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge? 
Talk:Patrol torpedo boat PT-41

message: Les bateaux en contreplaqué. Plywood boats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.74.124.112 (talk) 09:13, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Prince of Brazil

message: Hi, the article for Barbara of Portugal states that she was briefly Princess of Brazil as heiress presumptive to the Portuguese throne until her younger brother was born. This list does not include her. Either way, one of these articles is incorrect, so could someone look into that? Thanks. Unlimitedlead (talk) 01:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbara of Portugal
Talk:Marvin Perry

message: Verifiable sourcing supporting notability seems to exist. I will tackle that tomorrow. Need to stop now.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  03:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added thanks to User:208.59.93.238. There's more out there, hard to sift through all the indexes and forums.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  17:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 
Talk:Dodge Ram 50

message: Does anyone have a source for the claim this article makes about the Dodge Ram 50's compatibility with E85 fuel?
:I can't imagine that's true, since the amount of work required to make that feasible would be extensive (probably more than the cost of the truck these days.) Duncan1800 09:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

message: tjis car looks like a Mitsubishi L200 Pickup - anyone who can find the missing link? --Galantea0 (talk) 02:29, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  l200 

message: Same vehicle but sold by Mitsubishi as the Mighty Max in North America and by the Chrysler Corporation as the Dodge D50 and later as the Dodge Ram 50TruckMatt (talk) 01:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mass spectrometry/Assessment

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 20:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Mass spectrometry
Talk:Perimeter Mall

message: In the course of the AfD discussion of notability, I turned up these references which could be used to expand this article:
*
*
*
*
*
*
Searching Google's News Archive produces 4000+ hits, many of which coud be useful. --A. B. (talk)  20:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote article should NOT be deleted.  It looks good and is improving. Bundas 00:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may also want to make any positive or negative comments at the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perimeter Mall. --A. B. (talk)  01:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for improving this article 

message: User:DellComputersXP has recently been changing the location of the Perimeter Mall, Dunwoody station and the Perimeter Center from Dunwoody to Sandy Springs, Georgia. Looking at Google Maps, the station is clearly marked as in Dunwoody. The official website of the mall and center both list Dunwoody as their address, not Sandy Springs. So I believe that these articles should say they mall and station are in Dunwoody. I've added sources in the articles to support this. If User:DellComputersXP, or any other editor, disputes this, could we try to reach a consensus through discussion here? Thanks, Railfan23 (talk) 05:55, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunwoody or Sandy Springs
Talk:Ball game

message: There is no English language listing for "Prellball" - can anyone help out in this respect?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuzzer (talk • contribs) 10:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we divide the list of ball games into alphabetic groups, say A-K and L-Z?    Tabletop (talk) 05:31, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divide list 

message: This page was moved to "ball sport" without consensus. I have moved it back and would be against such a change as it is not a common way of referring these. Please see Common naming conventions. Thank you,⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 21:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title check 

message: This page should either be moved to ball games or ball sports - either is more common. I think sports should be used as the articles listed are more sports than games. If there is no objection I will move. IgnorantArmies  —Preceding undated comment added 07:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Negative. Read my thread above.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 14:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I realized this must be a misunderstanding of cultural differences today. To clear things up, I've updated the page with references that explain the cultural differences and moved the list to List of ball games. The term "ball sports" needs to be left off of either as it is not common...see this comparison in published texts. Wiki should use the most common name in titles.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 02:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move page
Talk:Nivkh people

message: How is Nivkh pronounced? Blaylockjam10 (talk) 06:32, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:List of Fablehaven characters

message: Do a whole page on it so it is more organized and people will be able to read it easier. Jibajabba 20:40 10/10/07
I've been working a lot on this page, (can you tell I'm an ultra-fan?!) I think it has come together rather nicely.  If anyone has any suggestions for improvement please let me know here on this discussion board.
--Rgpassey (talk) 15:08, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters
Talk:Vermont Golden Dome Book Award

message: DCF is the second-oldest ongoing US state-wide children's choice book award program --inaug. 1957, after William Allen White Children's Book Award, Kansas 1953. Source: examination of websites for such awards in 48 states; not found for Alaska and Idaho, which participate in the regional PNW YRCA.
We have pages for such awards in 8 states and the regional Pacific NorthWest Young Reader's Choice Award, inaugurated 1940. 
--P64 (talk) 02:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venerable 
Talk:Wizard of Ahhhs

message: "Wizard of Ahhhs" is also the name of a track by the band Sinewave from their 2005 release Unity Gain. 
--Ihearyoucolin 04:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Anti-psychologism

message: If logic and its truth exist apart from human ideas, has the manner of their existence ever been determined? I assume that any existence apart from human ideas is a non–existence or nothing in relation to a human observer.Lestrade (talk) 15:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Being there
Talk:Transport in Czechoslovakia

message: OK, this is stupid. It's not like the country had no transportation before 1985. Some mention of it might be nice. Like, Tatra, for instance? Or the fact Czech car companies were protected by an 8% tariff? See G.N.Georgano, Cars: Early and Vintage, 1886-1930 (London: Grange-Universal, 1985).  Trekphiler 04:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ethics of artificial intelligence

message: Is there any justification for describing the (negative) risks of AI as "challenges"? Crossing the road on foot puts you at risk of being hit by a car. Taking a medicine prescribed to you by a doctor puts you at risk of side effects. These are risks, not challenges. The use of "challenge" here sounds very much like WP:SOAP. Boud (talk) 13:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenges vs risks