lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cecotrope

message: Hi, I've got a problem with the spelling of so-called "cecotropy" ... every book I've ever read spells it "caecotrophy". Obviously "caecotrophy" is the original English spelling, and "cecotropy" is the American spelling. Frankly, as an Aussie, I've got a real problem with American spelling - if anyone in the world enters the English spelling, how are they going to be directed to this page with the American spelling? 
Cheers, look forward to your replies!
I have set up a redirect page for the word "Caecotrophes".  That should do the trick. Gadev 11:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, does anyone know what marsupial and what primate these are? :C  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 04:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Plg1399 (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Mammalogy
Talk:Ronnie Jepson

message: Do we really need to mention all the players he has signed.....? ChrisTheDude 14:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is correcting the spelling and grammar of such entries condoning the posting of day to day bulletins such as this?  Kevin McE 19:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:History of the National Health Service

message: The content of this article isn't mine at all! It was previously all in the bulky main article National Health Service. --Mereda 14:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looking at this tweet with newspaper cuttings, it seems there was a big announcement to the press / presentation to parliament on 22nd March 1946. Worthy of a mention?
-- Harry Wood (talk) 14:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Presented to parliament" on 22nd March 1946
Talk:Atomeka Press

message: The domain seems to have lapsed  so I have removed the link. If it ever resurfaces again we can add it back in. (Emperor 18:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Domain
Talk:Sophia of Halshany

message: The author of this article asked me to copy edit it, as English is not their native language. I have made some improvements, but as to the historical accuracy of some of the information, I bear no responsibility. If Jogaila's sons were born in the 1420's, he could not have married Sophia in 1442 (in fact I believe he was dead already). Please check your dates. For now I have removed it. My position regarding his name in these articles, is prior to becoming King of Poland he is Jogaila, and afterwards he is Wladyslaw II or simply Jagiello. Any other format is way too confusing to anyone not familiar with the history of the area and period. Dr. Dan 14:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dr. Dan, thank you for making the article readable and for pointing out the mistake. I corrected the year of marriage. Juraune 09:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Edit

message: Seems developed and well referenced enough for B-class. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:44, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class
Talk:Civil War: Front Line

message: This article is not fair use.  It is hardly transformative and contains far too detailed plot summaries.  I recommend quite a bit of trimming. I don't know about a merger with Civil War (comics) since it's got its own themes and possible critical analysis, but definitely needs to be shortened. --Newt ΨΦ 16:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use 

message: Isn't that out yet, and why isn't there a summary out for it yet?Phoenix741 16:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I'm glad it's not summarized yet.  These summaries are play-by-plays, not brief in the slightest. --NewtΨΦ 00:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well yea i get that, but it is hard to belive that something has not come up yet, even if it is a play by play.Phoenix741 18:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's seeming like the people who'd been responsible for updating this, apparently stopped... -Tim Rhymeless  (Er...let's shimmy) 06:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue #6 

message: (Overlooked is the fact that, since Wonder Man's real name has been known to the public for several years, S.H.I.E.L.D. could have easily engaged in such extortion regardless of whether or not registration existed.) -- I'd also add something to the effect of "Also overlooked is that his tax problems would have/should have been wiped clean as part of his years of service to the Avengers," but I don't know how lenient the IRS is on the Avengers. --Dr Archeville 03:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wonder Man's Tax Problems 

message: Some of these really need to be trimmed down, especially issue 11, which appears to be a frame-by-frame, blow-by-blow account of the events of the issue. -- saberwyn 21:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summaries 

message: There should be a World War Hulk : Front Line page or someone needs to create a Front Line (comics) page and merge the Civil War: Front Line page into it and include sections on both Civil War and World War Hulk. --Savre 23:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: World War Hulk

message: This whole page needs to be re-written from the ground up. Unsalvageable at this point. Lots42 01:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfortunately 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  13:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Charles Harvey Dixon

message: So was he from Watlington or from Gunthorpe? Please clarify, thanks ::Supergolden:: 14:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to say he was born in the former and moved to the latter. RJFJR (talk) 16:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:South 24 Parganas

message: Should not this article discuss the orgin of the name? Or at least crossreference such a discussion? --Bejnar (talk) 15:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: History of name

message: This article has given us a historical vignette without providing any English language references whatsoever. Citations are needed. Knaveknight (talk) 05:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 
Talk:List of counts of Burgundy

message: Does anyone ever actually refer to "Palatine Burgundy", or the "Counts of Palatine Burgundy"? I have only ever seen it as "County of Burgundy". Adam Bishop 14:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Palatine

message: I see both Hugh the Black and Otto-William are listed here, although both their articles describe them as dukes of Burgundy, noted in the beginning of this article (and elsewhere) as being distinct from the counts of Burgundy, at least prior to the marriage of Jeanne III, Countess of Burgundy and Eudes IV, Duke of Burgundy (per their articles). LeaHazel : talk : contribs 18:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Counts vs. Dukes

message: I hadn't thought that the archdukes had been given Franche Comté as well as the Spanish Netherlands.  Could a source for this be provided? john k (talk) 22:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Archdukes
Talk:Martin Vučić

message: I havet to say Martin is amazing guy, i like him bikoz he is soo astonishing nad has very good humor, PS i think we should put a picture of him in the article and maybe two piks ok :) ;) DropItLikeItsYugoSlavian 14:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martin Statue 
Talk:Battle of Manila

message: werent there also battles fought over manila in ww2? (3-4 March 1945 I believe) --Astrokey44 14:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ww2 

message: Didn't Manila first get taken by Legaspi in 1571? Alternativity (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legaspi 

message: The article said Manila was destroyed 9 times and they have sources for it but now I ask, how many "Battles of Manila" are really there anyway? Take for example in WW2; at least 2 battles for Manila occurred: when the Japanese invaded it and when the Allied forces retook it or during the British Occupation where 3 battles occurred not one, 1st when it was taken by the British; next, when it was retaken by Simon Anda and then the Chinese Revolt which happened afterwards. How about the Battle of La Naval De Manila?  
Considering this, shouldn't we expand the current roster from 9 battles of Manila to 12?
I hope this gets solved soon. Gintong Liwanag Ng Araw (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not an article but a disambiguation page and as such should only have links to (1) actual articles that (2) might be titled or confused with an article titled "Battle of Manila". This page is not intended to inform but rather intended to help people search for the right article.--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 03:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many battles of Manila are there? 

message: Somebody added 3 more battles of Manila which strictly speaking are not even military battles but are more like coup-de-tats that occured around the time of the People Power Uprising and the worse thing about it is its so haphazardly made and pockmarked with wrong grammar. Should we delete this? Gintong Liwanag Ng Araw (talk) 16:11, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed those and cleaned up page per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 03:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Vandalism
Talk:Holy Family Academy (New Hampshire)

message: It is true that this page reads like an advertisement.  The content is straight from the school's webpage, and seems to have been contributed by an alumnus of the school.  Still, the information is correct and valuable.  Can other folks who know something about the school, even if they are part of the school community, edit or rewrite this for neutrality?
Karl Cooper
24.128.21.135 14:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no connection to the school, and thus gave it a NPOV treatment that I think addresses most of the issues requiring the tag, including adding an info box and more neutral language. (If the user who placed the tag disagrees, please revert and cite reasons, and please offer what additional information is required for removal.) If someone familiar with the school can add the number of faculty and students to the infobox, that would be helpful. - Nhprman 15:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. Thank you for this information. - Nhprman 19:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Snow Canyon High School (Utah)

message: "They have good athletics programs and they commonly dominate Dixie, Pine View, and soon Desert Hills."
Doesnt sound like NPoV to me meowmix4jo (talk) 01:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: This article is nothing more than a conversation, it should be deleted. Hawaiianchief
:Conversation? hardly. It should be kept, seeing as how it's an article about a school that at least a few people will want to see. keeping it is doing no harm. --PolarWolf 19:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this? 

message: Just updated the whole page to one-up Dixie.
Flyers my arse.
But yeah, it's dumb to ruin the page, since probably 20 SC kids have ever thought to look up SCHS on Wiki anyway. Not a good way to represent.
wow...you must really not have a life since your dissing on your own school...haha flyers rock  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.36.68.152 (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: I attended the school in 10th and 11th grade, back in 01 and 02. I remember many things from then and I have my old yearbooks. I'd like to see mention of the past principals and also a list of current staff if possible. Checked the official site and glad to see that Frau Braunberger is still teaching the German courses.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.98.169 (talk) 06:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: We Need to not just delete things on this page because we are afraid to click the sources, whoever added that the REgion nine regions isnt verifiable didn't click the UHSAA source? it's the governing body i don't know how much more verification we will get.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrantBess (talk • contribs) 00:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 2020
Talk:List of Florida's highest points

message: ben is amazing :)             Ben s Tower of Terror, Spaceship Earth, etc.  I did this for two reasons:
# Because this should be a list of highest geographical points
# Even considering non-geographical objects, there are building far taller than anything Disney has, so they wouldn't have a place on the list anyway
I did leave the Disney mountains, but I labelled them as "man-made" to distinguish them from actual geographical objects.
If anyone has any objection, I've opened up the discussion.  Justin The Claw 02:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of non-mountain items
Talk:Tactic

message: Tactical redirects to this DAB page, but there is no entry for anything corresponding to "tactical wear", "tactical gear", etc.  I can't seem to find an article about this category of equipment/clothing (and marketing niche), but it is surely a commonly sought search result for the term "tactical".  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tactical duty wear
Talk:Ecorse Road

message: The Road doesn't make it to Ecorse the City, but the road does run right through what used to be ecorse township.  The old Township of Ecorse used to encompass, Southgate, Taylor and parts of Allan Park, and Deaborn Heights, not to mention the City of Ecorse. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.220.16.62 (talk) 06:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecorse Township 

message: I tagged this article as containing original research.  It has no sources or external links for that matter.  If someone can source it, add them and remove the tag Stratosphere|Talk 04:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR 

message: This article is still unsourced. It should be deleted or improved. Another option is to merge it into M-17. --Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can start with . --NE2 00:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no mention of Ecorse Road there at all. --Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ecorse Road is US 12 there:  --NE2 01:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That still doesn't explain how the rest of the road is notable at all as a state highway. the project scope for WP:MISH is for State Trunklines only. the minor portion of Ecorse that carries the US 12 or M-17 designations is not enough alone to justify its inclusion in MISH. It is better served only being tagged as part of WP:USST if not outright deleted or  merged into other articles. If you feel it should stay, I suggest you clean the article up to much higher standards. --Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're not interested in it, leave it alone. It's a historic high-speed roadway and belongs in the project best suited to cover those. --NE2 02:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Joseph Wallace Oman

message: Hey some of the dates on this page don't make sense.  Ie: "He entered the United States Naval Academy in 1889 and graduated 4th in his class of 1886. He was commissioned as an Ensign in 1888 and promoted to Lieutenant junior grade in 1896."  4th in his high school class? if he entered the academy in 1889 then how can he be commissioned in 1888?
:Good catch. I checked back with the original article and it says 1882, so I must have typoed it. Fixed now and the dates make more sense. (And it's his Navy Academy class, not high school.) JRP 04:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 20:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Dennis Ritchie

message: Wiki attm states Denis died on October 12, WIRED writes it happened on 8th: 
https://www.wired.com/2011/10/dennis-ritchie/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.148.197.25 (talk) 09:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The article correctly states that he was found dead (not "died") on October 12.  Apparently he had been dead for a few days, but the exact time of death was indeterminable.  (I encountered a similar situation for my brother's death.)  No doubt, the Coroner picked some specific date for the official "time of death", but during previous discussion here several editors were unhappy with substituting an arbitrary date, thus the factual wording that was used in the article.  —  DAGwyn (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Death of Dennis Ritchie. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Greyjoy talk 09:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Death of Dennis Ritchie" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Virginia Military Institute/Archive 3

message: The article states VMI alumni have won the Pulitzer Prize.
"VMI's graduates include a Secretary of State, Nobel Prize winners, Pulitzer Prize winners, Rhodes Scholars, U.S. Senators and Representatives, College and University Presidents, and CEOs. Some examples:" Which famous alumni won the Pulitzer Prize? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.98.148.173 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 28 December 2005  (UTC)
:The famous alumnus was John H. Crider, class of 1928.  He won for journalism in 1949, while he was the Editor in Chief of the Boston Herald.  Glad to have been helpful, if you have any other questions, please let us know.Tuf 16:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pulitzer Prize

message: Anyone have more information on the first African-American cadets at VMI? All we have in the article now is that one or more graduated from VMI in 1968. Any names, background on the the first to enroll?  Thanks, Rillian 02:02, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Found some more background: first African-American enrolled in 1964. Also, the "Promaji Club", a black student organization was founded in the 1970s and it "created a Jonathan Daniels award for civil rights work and gave it to Salem's Cabell Brand, a 1944 VMI alumnus. Since then, VMI has turned the Daniels award into a major humanitarian award, first received by former President Jimmy Carter" Rillian 14:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: African-American Cadets

message: This tag needs to stay in on the statement that VMI rings are the biggest class rings in the world, bigger than SuperBowl rings.  There is nothing backing up this claim, and I have heard the same claim made by alums of numerous military colleges/universities.  If a citation is not added, and someone removes the tag again, I will consider it vandalism, and will report it as such.  Unverifiable claims do not belong in an encyclopedia.--Vidkun 14:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|fact}} tag
Talk:Pontiac LeMans

message: Why was this car spelled "Pontiac LeMans". The town is spelled Le Mans!
Please don't spread the wrong spelling for the town and race, only for this car. --Matthead 15:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We're Americans, we don't know any better!  Bubba73 (talk), 02:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Should the Mid-size LeMans and the Compact LeMans have separate articles?
Bkissin 03:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Articles for each incarnation??? 

message: Thanks for the article-- I found one possible error.  I owned a 1980 Grand LeMans, and it came with a Chevrolet 229 2-barrel for an engine, not the Buick 231.  I was the second owner of the car, and pretty sure everything was original/matching, fwiw, so this may have also been an engine option.66.90.140.95 19:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would make sense. We don't even have an article on the 229 V6 yet. It's so easy to assume the 231 was the V6 offering, because it's been used everywhere. I'll try and dig up some information on the 229. --Sable232 20:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine Option 

message: I'm a bit confused as to the year breaks in the article. Why are the very different 1968-69 models included with the 1964-67 models? And why are the '73-'77s added to the '70-72s?
The breakout should be: 1964-67, 1968-72, 1973-77, and 1978-81. Rhettro76 16:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generations? 

message: Probably the most famous chase in movie history involved a Pontiac LeMans, and as far as I know that's the only portrayal of it in film form.  In posterity, people (of my age particularly) who knew nothing of the car in its own lifetime, know it from Popeye Doyle's driving.  Why was my edit deleted? Chaparral2J (talk) 06:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The French Connection
File talk:Jyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt.png

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --108.129.120.238 (talk) 15:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why?  Where's the copyvio?  We already see both sides: this image provides one, and this one provides the other.  Nyttend (talk) 03:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hamdvahid's edit above confirms that this was never a copyright issue, but rather a personal distaste for the images. "I don't like it" or religous feelings have nothing to do with copyright law, and there is no copyright issue here. In addition, Wikipedia has an important policy: it is not censored, and Wikipedia also includes images offensive to Christians, Jews or Hindus, and such images aren't removed either. Including the image falls copyright-wise in line with Wikipedia's normal interpretation of the fair use provisions of US copyright law, which is the relevant concern here. In particular, the inclusion is merited since the topic of the article is indeed these very images. In addition, previous discussion has decided that the images will not be removed, see :Talk:Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy. Consequently, I'm restoring the previous (September 7) version of the image description page. --Valentinian T / C 19:30, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: I have a higher resolution copy, that still is not high enough resolution to read the article, so it fits fair use. Would it be possible to update using this copy? In the higher resolution one I have, the attribution to the paper is visible. In the current context it is not. If we're using an image as fair use, the sources name should be visible in the work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin Van Ballin' (talk • contribs) 03:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Resolution?
Talk:Woodbridge Senior High School (Virginia)

message: I noticed that there has been a lot of vandalism on this page (and some of it still exists as of writing this).  This page needs to be cleaned up, and probably deserves semi-protection.  129.21.115.105 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:34, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Vandalism