lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mukluk

message: I deleted the following. It's out of place, and possibly a clumsy attempt at guerrilla marketing. If someone really feels it's worth it, then the proper thing to do is to write neutral text (not such a puff piece) for new pages "Mukluk (wrestler)" and "Oahu (wrestler)" in Category:Professional wrestlers. I suppose end-of-the-main-article disambiguation links could be inserted at "Mukluk" and Oahu" but personally I wouldn't want to see that—let's not "muk up" straightforward articles.
 == Mukluk-Oahu Feud ==
 Mukluk is also the name of the famous wrestler from WCW vs. the World.  He is most famous for his
 30 minute bouts with Oahu. This much publicized rivalry between Mukluk and Oahu has grown
 to mythic proportions.  Mukluk currently hold the TJK and Shackles Belts.
--IslandGyrl 19:11, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrestling? 

message: Could someone please get a photo of some mukluks? Thanks. Deco 00:19, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Is it also slang for rubber boots? --Gbleem 00:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Depending on the dialect the word "naluktuq" means "wades into water" (in other places it means "swimming" amd refers to only animals and not humans). A variation on it, "naluk" would be "splashing in puddles". Rubber boots or hip waders would be (and I don't have the correct spelling right now) something like "naluktiq". CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot that there is the combined Inuinnaqtun/English word "naluking". Which tends to refer to children spalsing in puddles or an adult acting like a child and doing the same. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  rubber boots 

message: urban dictionary questionable source says it's a derogatory term for eskimo. --Gbleem 14:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  derogatory 

message: "In the Inuipiaq language the "u" makes an "oo" sound, and so the spelling "maklak" is used with the same pronunciation." To which I have to say, "Huh?" I don't see the connection.  TREKphiler hit me ♠  00:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that sentence is less than clear.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.89.149.2 (talk) 19:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spellcheck

message: Anyone have access to this?
Adamack, Lorraine. The Art of Making Moccasins and Mukluks . Assiniboia: Able II Print Ltd: 1985
Anyone have any other suggestions for better sources, including non-English-language ones? HLHJ (talk) 03:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better sources
Talk:70 Virginis b

message: * Talk:70 Virginis b : 70 Virginis b → Goldilocks (planet) — because Goldilocks is the common name, and the one the press uses. 132.205.15.43 04:36, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *Oppose this move, for reasons I've outlined at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Astronomical_objects#Extrasolar_Planets Worldtraveller 12:45, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: *Strongly oppose, for same reasons.--Jyril 12:47, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. violet/riga (t) 22:05, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:RM
Talk:Troy Hurtubise

message: From my comments at that AfD: I've added another cite [to  Trojan Ballistics Suit of Armor], and although this technically meets the threshold for multiple independent sources, they are not substantial or in-depth enough to cover the subject to the level of depth the article goes, raising issues of WP:NOR. The inventor is certainly notable enough for the media coverage of his exploits, and the section in [this] article can be expanded with the WP:V content from [that] article. The effort needed to clean up [that] article would be better spent cleaning up [this] one. If the suit becomes sufficiently notable later, the content can always be split out again.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhaluza (talk • contribs) 11:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Trojan Ballistics Suit of Armor]] 

message: This section should be removed. It's written as if these claims are actually rational in someway.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.211.226 (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that self-reference? ;)BorkBorkGoesTheCode (talk) 09:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  no bork, obviously not (this) section on the talk page, the section "Angel Light" on the article page. 
Hurtubise made his claims about his "Angel Light" invention a dozen years ago, and there's no evidence that supports them.  However, since much of the article is attributable to the subject (i.e. claims made by Hurtubise himself), it is might be worthwhile (for a neutral point of view) to include some of his more improbable claims along with a note that they are unproven (or unfounded).
So basically like:
  ==Invention X== 
  On (date), Hurtubise revealed he had made Invention X which he claims can do Y. Hurtubise, whatever media interviewed him/published his press release) There is no evidence to date that Invention X actually can actually do Y, and Skeptic Z doesn't believe it can.Skeptic Z, whatever media interviewed/published Skeptic Z
Stating Hurtubise's claims like they are facts makes the article biased since the source is biased, but if it is a fact that he made said claims and making such claims is noteworthy in itself, then it's ok for it to be included in the article.  However, since Hurtubise's claims are generally pseudoscientific it is important to note that they are not supported by actual evidence.  The best way is to cite a reliable source who says as much, but because mainstream scientists are often likely to just ignore pseudoscientific claims it might be hard to find a reference.  If that's the case then just stating "Hurtubise claims about his invention have not been confirmed by the mainstream scientific community and there have been no peer-reviewed scientific articles published that support his testimonials to the media."  Even without citing a specific source this wouldn't be original research because it is attributable to the reliable, published sources that are scientific journals' indexes/archives, and even if it might take some time it would be verifiable.
--IPEditor (talk) 18:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angel Light
Talk:John Rushworth

message: I have compiled a historical biography of John Rushworth and transcribed lengthy excerpts from his Historical Collections for which he is most famous. The content of this excerpt also links to other articles on Wikipedia and it helps to show how the life of John Lilburne has been ignored and obscured in the UK while his legacy became the very foundation of the US Bill of Rights. MPLX/MH 04:38, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Proxomitron

message: I have changed the page in an attempt to improve the tone, and hopefully have added some useful content. Please change as required. Note that Scott does have a Wikipedia page, and that is where information about him should go. WhiteHatLurker 01:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After a bit of searching on Wikipedia, especially reading the discussion around the template for tone, I believe this version should be okay w.r.t. tone, and have removed the "tone" tag. WhiteHatLurker 06:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone warning 

message: Can anyone describe the minimal set of conditions to exactly emulate a direct connection while NOT bypassed?
I'll outline the importance of that apparently absurd question. :) With electronic music synthesisers capable of silence when sound should be heard, or of making extremely confusing noise, there is a 'parked' or neutral state for the main controls so the user can quickly test things or return to a safe state. I want to use Proxomitron as a diagnostic tool, to make one or two test filters or just watch the log window. Instead of aiming for some 'ultimate filter set', I want to use Proxomitron to explore and fix specific weaknesses in the context of a given system. A 'parked' condition equal to the direct connection state is the most important thing to allow this, because it offers a scientific 'control' condition for precise comparisons.
Is such a state possible? If so, how?
Removing all filters and editing the configuration never got me the exact same results as a direct connection. I searched the 'unofficial Proxomitron forum', not finding guidance. It may be worth adding details of how to do it on the main page if there is a known source to be cited. 
31.51.85.234 (talk) 23:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Base condition for diagnostics 

message: There is no reference to the precursor application 'ijbswa'.
Family Guy Guy (talk) 19:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reference to the precursor 'ijbswa'
Talk:List of Eastern Orthodox jurisdictions in North America

message: What about the Assyrian Church of the east?Its also orthodox.
Sargon 13:55, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This list is for Eastern Orthodox churches.  The Assyrian Church of the East has been separated from the Eastern Orthodox communion for many centuries.  ——Preost talk contribs 14:24, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Assyrian Orthodox

message: I added the "unreferenced" tag because it is not clear as to where much of this information came from.  An "external links" section is not a reference section.  Also note that orthodoxwiki.org cannot be used as a reference (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources).  I strongly suggest using inline citations for the information in this article.
I placed the POV tag on the article because some of the denominations seem to be labeled in derogatory ways ("resistance groups" and "'Walled off'").  If references can be provided that demonstrate that these terms are indeed neutral, then the POV tag should be removed.  (I would have checked the references myself, but none were given.) Dr. Submillimeter 17:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't like "resistance" or "walled off" either and because it has been two years since the above comment,  I changed them to "unaffiliated".  Perhaps a paragraph or a link could be added if the divisions need to be more fully explained, in a NPOV. --Bruce Hall (talk) 05:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warnings 

message: With the recognition of the MOC-AO, should the "Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of America and Canada" be added to the list of Mainstream Churches? Coquidragon (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of America and Canada
Talk:Gold Coast railway line

message: Should this part, "The Gold Coast (Robina) line branches from the Beenleigh at Beenleigh", actually be saying this? "The Gold Coast (Robina) line branches from the Beenleigh line at Beenleigh."
--Randolph 05:31, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it should - please feel free to change it. Lacrimosus 06:35, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article states that the line length is exactly zero miles/km. Is this due to some technical railway terms being used or a difficulty in calculating. Cls14 (talk) 15:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Line Length

message: Should the issue of over-crowding at peak times, as discussed in this article, be mentioned. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standing room only 

message: Due to popularity the Weekend timetable is now the same half hourly timetable as weekdays.
If it would help I have a current timetable I can send you --Ausisit (talk) 03:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weekend timetable
Talk:Gemini Awards

message: importance=Top for Canada project and other Canada projects as all nominations and receipiants receive a Wikipedia entry.  Argolin (talk) 02:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: High is acceptable, not "top", which is generally limited to articles that are listed on
. PKT(alk) 19:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: importance

message: What is the etymology of "Gemini" in the name?Curb Chain (talk) 03:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eymtolomgy 

message: There's no way to review this long list without one or more citations. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:22, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation(s) needed for award list
Talk:Robina, Queensland

message: I'm going to remove the categorisation of 'Queensland cities', as it's not really a city.  The Gold Coast is the city.  Robina is a suburb of the Gold Coast.
--Randolph 05:56, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: The article says "Robina is one of the largest communities on the Gold Coast". How was it determined that Robina was one of the largest communities on the Gold Coast?
Southport, Nerang and Robina all have in the order of 24,000 people. There is no similar statement on the Southport or Nerang pages. http://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/attachment/factsheet_popest2004.pdf --WikiCats 13:08, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Community?
Talk:Eazy-E

message: The year of birth is wrong... Should be 1963 2600:387:C:2D37:0:0:0:6 (talk) 22:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2022 

message: I propose that Lil Eazy-E get merged to this article. Although that article appears to have a good amount of information, all of the sources are either non-notable blogs or YouTube videos; and the remainder of the sources are more about his father than about Lil Eazy himself. In addition, although he appears to have a music career, it doesn't appear that he has ever charted anywhere. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 12:27, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I recently updated Lil Eazy E's article with better sources and more information. 2601:543:4203:45D0:994B:5356:655D:7D54 (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

text: oppose, Lil Eazy-E's article has enough info to stand alone and he's a notable figure with plenty of coverage. Kingofthedead (talk) 09:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose, having one article to cover two different singers like that is pretty unprecedented and it would be unneeded focus on Jr in his father's articles. No need to merge, keep it as it is. Chessrat (talk, contributions)  10:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Strong Oppose. I think the WP:SNOW clause applies here. Dr. Universe (talk) 02:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lil Eazy-E]] 

message: Easy death 2600:1016:B021:907F:0:19:B636:D701 (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Follow the money and who'd lose out 

message: Birth date is wrong. 85.224.75.95 (talk) 07:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born 1963 

message: In 2016, Eazy-E was posthumously inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame as a member of N.W.A. EazyStevie (talk) 20:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2024
Talk:Holi

message: In the "Issues" Section, under the "Environmental impact" sub-heading, change "According to a local tabloid, 30,000 bonfires burn every year during Holi, which is approximately 100 kilograms (220.46 lbs) of wood." to "According to a local tabloid, 30,000 bonfires burn every year during Holi, burning an estimated total of approximately 3 million kilograms (3306.93 US tons) of wood."
The current language is unclear that the cited reference referred to each individual bonfire burning 100 kg of wood.  30,000 bonfires burning 100 kilograms of wood?  That isn't even 30,000 matches! Mapgame (talk) 17:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I clarified that this refers to the amount burned by each fire, but I did not add the calculated total because it is not in the cited source. Thanks. Jamedeus (talk) 18:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2024 

message: — Assignment last updated by Baskotas (talk) 03:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II
Talk:Four Knights Game

message: *List some players who have used the Four Knights.
*Mention following variations and create appropriate redirects to Four Knights Game:
**Metger unpin in symmetrical (classical) variation
**Rubinstein variation/defense
**Belgrade Gambit
*Possibly add a discussion of symmetry in classical variation including examining when Black can and should break symmetry.  Fine has a good discussion of this in "Ideas Behind the Chess Openings", and I think it's still valid today.
** Belgrade Gambit  4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Nb4 (possible Be7/Nxd5/Nxe4) 6. Nxd4 (Bc4 Nd4!?) unclear.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChessCreator (talk • contribs) 15:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is wikipedia, go hit the edit button. ChessCreator (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Ain't that variation called the double Ruy Lopez, code C49 on the ECO? maybe that should be added to the article. 201.185.135.186 (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  4.Bb5 Bb4 
Template talk:Musical notation

message: How about:

? Hyacinth (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Development removed from this template, added to Template:Musical form, and Template:Musical development redirected to Template:Musical form. Hyacinth (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Development

message: Cue note is missing. A cue note is not the same as a grace note. -- Cachsten (talk) 08:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  cue notes
Talk:Julian Eltinge

message: The Eltinge Theater in its Burlesque days is referenced in "The G-String Murders" by Gypsy Rose Lee (ghost-written by Craig Rice) . When a corpse is found sitting on the backstage toilet of a burlesque theater the authorities threaten to close it. One actress cries "Oh God- not back to the Eltinge!"
Saxophobia 02:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eltinge Theater 

message: According to the OED (New Edition), the first known use of the term ambisextrous was in 1929.  Its use follows: "...twenty or thirty young Apollos..paraded their ambisextrous charms..."
It doesn't sound like it began with Julian Eltinge.  Anybody have a source for this? --Superluser 07:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops!  Looks like the quote is right below--and it predates the first cite in the OED.  Hmm.  I wonder if I can get into the OED with this? --Superluser 18:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ambisextrous? 
Talk:Robert Burton

message: I removed the erroneous claim that Burton hung himself.  The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography's entry for Burton discounts this unsubstantianted rumor.
*Sorry, didn't see this note until I'd added a reference to the passage in Aubrey. Delete if appropriate.--Shtove (talk) 13:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Pages moved. –  wbm1058 (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 February 2021
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Articles on Caltech dormitories

message: *I've got a question: If the House articles are to be deleted based on their not being "encyclopedic," I'd like a good definition of the term encyclopedic. What sorts of things belong in the Wikipedia, what sorts of things should not be here, and why are the House articles in the later category? I've read the WP:NOT article, and from that gather that articles which are too general, only contain links, involve future events, are dictionary entries, etc., should be excluded. So what's the problem with the Caltech House pages? Is the complaint that as stubs, they merely repeated information available on the main Caltech page? That seems more like a reason to request that people augment the articles, not delete them. Is the problem the potential POV issue of Caltech students not reflecting impartially on the Houses? There are enough inter-House pseudo-rivelries (not to mention potential Rotation1 violations) to keep the articles honest. Seriously, I'm curious the real reasons people feel these articles should be deleted and never allowed to exist again. -- Caltech student 65.3.0.25 07:13, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Santa Maria di Collemaggio

message: http://www.santamariadicollemaggio.it/ - there it is Jebontewind (talk) 09:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basilica?
Talk:Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale (federal electoral district)

message: What a tedious name!!!!
Tabletop 07:22, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The map says 'Waterdale.'  Should it not say Waterdown?
:Yes it should, I got it mixed up with Westdale. I shall atempt to fix it. --  Earl Andrew - talk 21:09, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waterdale?!
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 6

message: I propose removing the following paragraph unless a better citation for it can be found:
::In a September 27, 1999 deposition, he told why he refused to turn over guardianship to Ms. Schiavo's parents. He said it was, "because they put me through pretty much hell the last few years [with] the litigations they put me through [and] their attitude towards me because of the litigations. There is no other reason and that her parents wouldn't carry out her wishes."
:::The citation for it is http://www.zimp.org/stuff/contradictions.htm - not good enough for direct citation within the article itself.  If anyone is in love with this paragraph and insists on keeping it, please find a better citation.  I will be removing it later this evening unless a better citation is found.
--AStanhope 23:47, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guardianship - Removal Pending 

message: Powerline and Jim Geraghty have raised allegations about the Republican "talking points memorandum" about the poltical ramifications of the Schiavo case possibly being a fake.  This is sourced and should not be deleted. 
Powerline (blog), Jim Geraghty of National Review Online, and Michelle Malkin have raised allegations of the talking memo being a potential forgery. So has Mickey Kaus at Slate (Magazine).  For some reason User:Neutrality keeps deleting it without comment. It may or may not be true, but the allegations have been made and are newsworthy.
I've changed it back after the Powerline passage was deleted. I agree with the memo, BUT I want to be neutral. Saopaulo1 08:12, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
I added the blog cites so they can be refered to, but left the names off. 24.18.59.229 03:02, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Politics and Pundits

message: It looks like someone accidentally duplicated the article when they were editing, so I reverted to the last non-duplicated version.  It didn't look like I missed any important edits, but it was rather hard to tell. Appologies if I removed anything important --19:01, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *So did I but slightly later than you.  It seems that I did revert some legitimate (albeit minor) edits.  I apologize for that. --Vik Reykja 19:34, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication Removal

message: I attempted to revert this page twice, labeling it with variants of "rv vandalism". Nothing happened. I then inserted a period, which worked. I then reverted by cutting and pasting, which worked, accompanied by ye label "Vandals were at work". I then inserted a period, titled this a revert, and then reversed my own addition of a period without trouble. What gives? Rickyrab 02:53, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Turns out that the vandal had reverted his/her own edits, and I missed that technicality. oops. Rickyrab 21:50, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverts on vandalism