lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WiMedia Alliance

message: Certified Wireless USB can operate in two way:
Coexistence Wireless USB operates on top of Wimedia UWB PHY - Wimedia UWB MAC - Convergence Layer. 
Pure Wireless USB operates directly on top of Wimedia UWB PHY. 
I wonder where this distinction comes from. Currently there's only 1 Certified Wireless USB implementation. 
This seems to be the one referred to here as Coexistence Wireless USB.
----
Probably this refers to current CWUSB model where CWUSB devices can be WiMedia MAC&PHY aware and participate to the WiMedia MAC beaconing and other channel management or CWUSB device may be not aware of this and are only understanding CWUSB related data transfer (sending WiMedia beacons according to instructions sent by host or not sending WiMedia MAC beacons at all). CWUSB hosts are always WiMedia MAC&PHY aware to faciliate coexistence with other PALs using WiMedia UWB.
 
--Zagueiro 16:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comment

message: Feel free to add a UWB column to the OFDM#OFDM system comparison table. Mange01 11:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OFDM system comparison table 

message: There were earlier reports that WiMedia alliance was to be disbanded by end of 2009. However their website contains neither the disbanding announcement, nor any new developments since end of 2009. What is the current operational state of WiMedia Alliance? --Dmitry (talk•contibs) 10:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disbanding 

message: The term "Common Signaling Mode (CSM)" is used in this article as a potential solution to the two PHY problem. However, there is no link to an article on CSM. I was also unable to find an article on CSM through disambiguation. Can anyone help? WithGLEE (talk) 12:32, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Signaling Mode
Talk:Chris Mooney (journalist)

message: How is this person an academic?  If that is a claim then his academic credentials or affiliation needs to be explicitly stated.  He seems to be a journalist only.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.162.245.27 (talk) 22:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  academic? 
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-09-25/Board elections

message: I resigned as CRO after Wikimania 2005, not before. My book was also published before then (2004) in its first edition. I did take a fairly long hiatus from most Wikimedia-level activities (including unsubscribing from most lists) until January 2006, when the Wikimedia Committees were announced (I did continue to do MediaWiki development work, speeches, etc. during this time). The creation of the committees was a very positive step in opening up the organization (previously it was run entirely by its Board of Trustees), and my motivation for returning. I would not have returned to do Wikimedia-level work if those changes had not occurred.
For those interested in what I'm doing as a Board member, I'd advise you to subscribe to foundation-l, where many initiatives take root and reports are often announced or published.--Eloquence* 05:46, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia Signpost strives to ensure that all articles are as accurate as possible. I spent a long time writing this article, and I apologize for those errors. I will make sure to issue a correction in next week's issue, and apologize for any inconvenience. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

text: If Wikinews wishes to cover this, then they may, but the Signpost will still cover any event or news appropriate to Wikipedia, including the Board elections. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections
Talk:St Mary's College, Melbourne (residential college)

message: I've tried what I could do add whatever history I could find, given it seems we don't intend to delete this article. Are there any photos we could use of the college, as well as any other information relevant to the college? I don't think the fact that people being able to drink milo and redbull there is particularly helpful as we'd most certainly be able to consume such beverages elsewhere as well --Chan Yin Keen 03:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding the article
Talk:Turkish Constitution of 1924

message: created article on 26/09/2006 Baristarim 19:51, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: * Article on Brittannica available with trial
* Turkish Grand National Assembly's own page on history of THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITION AND PARLIAMENTARY LIFE This source is useful for all articles related to Turkey including independence for congresses, Turkish Grand NA, all constitutions, Ottoman parliaments and constitution, etc.
* Google cache of THE STATE ORDER, THE CONSTITUTION, THE LEGAL SYSTEM, a quick history
* Google cache of an article related to political history of Turkey
* Chronology of constitutional history
* Constitution and state system of Turkey, Michigan Consulate General of Turkey
* Searching Google books is a good idea, some have full text --Scientia Potentia 09:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Resources that may be helpful
Talk:The Jazz Piano Book

message: This seems more like a review than an encyclopedia article. --Rictus 06:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see your point, but I think most of it is readily verifiable with reference to the text. Maybe the last paragraph is a bit POV. If there is too much emphasis on one aspect or another, then it's up to someone to jump in and edit accordingly. Kisch 23:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

text: References would help. Hyacinth (talk) 01:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Cliff Hanley

message: I suggest that this page, 'Cliff Hanley' is deleted, as its contents are identical to 'Cliff Hanley, novelist' and browsers looking for 'Cliff Hanley, artist' could be wrongly directed here.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hagoli (talk • contribs) 06:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A much better option would be to just retitle as the 'Cliff Hanley, novelist' page is now deleted.Cliffhanley 16:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

text: It was a daft move to delete 'Cliff Hanley, novelist' and also 'Cliff Hanley, artist'. There are two separate and totally distinct Cliff Hanleys. One, the novelist, is dead, and the other, the artist (myself) is very much alive and still in this world.  I request that you reinstall the two pages as they were, and junk the otiose, tautologous and confusing 'Cliff Hanley' page. Thank you!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cliffhanley (talk • contribs) 16:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Social War

message: A couple of problems here:
1. Dates are often the least satisfactory way of disambiguating articles, is there nothing better?
2. I think the third Italian Social War is the best known, I had never heard of the other 2 until I read this, so should it be the primary meaning? PatGallacher (talk) 01:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Seven minutes in heaven

message: Should this article mention the Family Guy episode that had the game in it?
: Should go for a "in popular culture" section, I think. - quispiamtalk [Anton Nordenfur] 19:06, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Family Guy

message: Should the article clarify on what "bumping uglies" is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben.yarmis (talk • contribs) 02:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bumping Uglies?

message: Has anyone ever actually played this game?  If so, how did it go?
I mean, in the movie version you end up in the cupboard with Alicia Silverstone, and after 7 minutes the lock jams.  In reality I guess you're more likely to find yourself in the company of that fat girl from Moesha.  And then the lock jams. Maikel (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reality

message: Does anyone have a cite for the rule that precludes full intercourse? --Daniel C. Boyer (talk) 21:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rule?

message: A reference to an xkcd webcomic in which the article's topic is mentioned is being added into article. The topic is vaguely mentioned in the cartoon (along with many other subjectes), the cartoon adds nothing to the topic's public percention, neither influences it in any other way. Other media items of the same relevance to the article had been proposed for addition. In my opinion, this makes the article an indiscriminate collection of information and such a piece or trivia should be deleted. This opinion is supported by the authors or WP:IPC and WP:XKCD. A comment on this would be highly appreciated. Abolen (talk) 08:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  xkcd link 

message: Every single pop culture reference mentioned here is American. I’m sure similar games are played around the world, but can we get a cite specifying this particular variant as a North American phenomenon? —Wiki Wikardo 19:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  American game 

message: Currently there are 2 places where some kind of disambiguation takes place:
* Seven minutes in heaven and
* Seven minutes in heaven (disambiguation).
A. Everything which is in Seven minutes in heaven (disambiguation) is also in Seven minutes in heaven, mainly in Seven_minutes_in_heaven#In_popular_culture_(sorted_by_year).
B. The products (films, songs, play) all are very close to the game, either by their title or because the game is played or mentioned in the product.
Therefore I opt that the product list should remain in the game's article.
C. And I, personally, like the timeline which is given in Seven_minutes_in_heaven#In_popular_culture_(sorted_by_year).
So, maybe, we:
* a. can just do without Seven minutes in heaven (disambiguation) or
* b. leave the disambiguation page existing, but take the 5 products out of the disambiguation page and rather list, in there, the types of these products, like: "There are several products like: films, songs and plays which contain a mention of "Seven minutes in heaven". A long list is in Seven_minutes_in_heaven#In_popular_culture_(sorted_by_year)." 
Steue (talk) 23:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which place is better for disambiguation?
Talk:Swahili literature

message: Great to have this started!
Let's see, Knappert (1982) describes four genres of Swahili oral literature: the tale (ngano), the song (wimbo), the epic (utenzi), and the proverb (mathali). Where does that fit in with the three-way distinction into riwaya, tamthilia and shairi? Especially utenzi seems to me to cross the border, as tenzi are often written down (literature) but are also recited (oral literature). — mark ✎ 13:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a place to list Swahili non-fiction books?  --McTrixie 17:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: List of Swahili non-fiction books? I mean, if you're going to start a list and maintain it I think it would be best to do so in a separate article. I don't think a list would be a great addition to this particular article; right now it needs more text, not more lists. — mark ✎ 17:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No no, not in this article.  And I don't have enough to start a nonfiction list now.  --McTrixie/Mr Accountable 19:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonfiction 

message: The correct word is Methali NOT Mathali.Correct this please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.199.119.60 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Wikipedia talk:FAQ/Readers

message: Minor detail: the Kiwixhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwix software is described on this FAQ as supporting Mac, Windows, Linux and Sugar.
However, Sugar OS is a distribution of Linux, so it might be better to remove it from the list of main OSs supported.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myoglobin (talk • contribs) 20:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offline reading: OS support for Kiwix
Template talk:Paleo-stub

message: I propose we change the icon to something else, e.g. an ammonite. There now exists the Template:Paleo-bird-stub which is was so long in the unlucky position to have to use the Ruddy Turnstone, alive, kicking, and fairly unrepresentative of the fossil record of the Aves, that I changed it to Archie too. Sorry for not asking, but the talk pages seem deserted and I just could not stand it anymore to see it frolicking around under Gansus. Dysmorodrepanis 06:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Icon

message: If the article size is very small (.i. the aerticle is a stub), the printed version shows a black line (before 'This page was last modified...') crossing the taxobox.
This can be bypassed by adding a 
 
line surrounded by some empty lines at the end of the article - exactly there where the paleo-stub is refrenced. As an example, please do a print preview of Opabinid as it is now and as it was bevore I did this improvement. Another articles affected by this is [[[Radiodonta]].
-- There is no such problem with the Laggania article. Why? Interestingly, this article uses portal|Paleontology together with paleo-stub.
However this could be easily done by adding this modification to the paleo-stub abnd it's relatives. 
How about this? 
(The best way might be to change the Wiki software, of course). 
Ernsts (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Printability of paleo-stub and others used together with Taxobox
Talk:Wikimapia

message: I am NOT an editor yet, i'm a newbie.I am trying to, but i am trying to become an editor. I sent you this message because i would try to fix the Wikimapia article but i might mess up, sorry.. :(
A greeting,Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS ♣---- (talk) 18:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please fix Wikimapia..
Talk:Bingham Park

message: I think you should delete this because it is just a park. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackjeffries (talk • contribs) 07:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Bingham Park and Whiteley Woods are two of the five Porter Valley Parks - Bingham Park is the largest of them. Two of them, Endcliffe Park and Forge Dam Park have their own articles, while Porter Clough does not. Is there any reason to link the two here in a single article? It seems to me there are several possibilities:
# Make it clear why these two spaces share a common article.
# Merge the article back into Porter Valley Parks.
# Split it into separate stubs for Bingham Park and Whiteley Woods (both currently redirects).
# Merge Whiteley woods back and move the rest to Bingham Park over the redirect.
Any comments? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Option 4 now done. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Why these two spaces?
Talk:Dalkey railway station

message: This says nothing! I'm so glad I read an article that didn't say anything as opposed to one that said something oddly interesting.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackjeffries (talk • contribs) 01:19, September 27, 2006‎
:I invite you to help us find reliable sources with more information that we can add to the article to flesh it out more. Slambo (Speak) 16:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content
Talk:Grand Rapids Township, Wood County, Ohio

message: Suppose there was an article that was much more complete and informative than this and it addressed a subject to which more people were exposed yearly than Grand Rapids, Ohio. Yeah- I'd delete that article, too.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackjeffries (talk • contribs) 07:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Supermarine Spiteful

message: The article says both Spiteful and Attacker were to N.5/45. Seems to contradict, no? Can somebody check & correct?  Trekphiler (talk) 20:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They both were - the Seafang (a navalised Spiteful) was the official Supermarine entry for N.5/45 but the experimental jet-engined Jet Spiteful (Attacker) was developed and subsequently ordered in place of the Seafang. The Jet Spiteful was really only developed to get a usable Nene-engined fighter into the air in the shortest possible time, the war still being fought at the time of its initial inception, hence the use of the Spiteful's wings and guns.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.65.146 (talk) 22:43, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Outta spite?

message: Three years after it might conceivably have meant anything, to anybody?
I'm referring to the laminar flow wing! I think that they built it for the fans:) 213.126.122.234 (talk) 18:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  An English P51?? 

message: I notice that you reverted the repositioning of an image, whilst explaining that there was a "standard position for aircraft articles" according to the page content guidelines for WikiProject Aircraft. 
However, I'm unclear why you said this, as editors are not obliged to follow these guidelines (according to the page with the suggested guidelines: "Finally, remember that you're in no way obliged to follow all, or even any, of these guidelines to contribute an article.") I'm also unclear why you moved the image. It makes little sense to include it so late in the article, i.e., not beside the relevant text that first describes the aircraft's design. 
As the article is at present a GAN, I will not be reverting your edit, but you could consider restoring the image's position yourself. Amitchell125 (talk) 17:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Guidelines for standard layout help to avoid edit wars, ignoring guidelines to produce non-standard layouts do not and confuse new editors. If the only image in an article is a 3-view it appears in the lead infobox otherwise in the specifications section. The image was moved from the specifications section with no explanation, it was added to that section in March 2007, as it had not moved in the past 17 years the consensus must have been that it was in the correct location.  The aircraft project's best work is its Featured Articles, of the 19 articles 11 are aircraft types and where a 3-view drawing is available it is in the specifications section in line with the guideline. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Traiteur (faith healer)

message: this page is an excellent article. i was trying to explain what a traiteur is to a friend, as i've been treated before, and this article explained it perfectly. it does not need to be changed one bit. from experience, i can tell you that the statements made are true. please keep this in mind if you're thinking about editing it.
*****
What is contained in the page may very well be accurate, but it still needs references. - GGT
::Agreed, we should get some references in here. Tommyt 17:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

message: There was the same or similar tradition among lumberjacks from Quebec.  I'm not entirely sure if the same term was used, but certainly it could provide references (especially in French) Cuvtixo 03:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Canadian Traditions
Talk:Gottfried Haberler

message: Is his birth year 1900, 1901 or 1902? Various mises.org articles seem to use all three. Is his name usually written with the noble "von" in it or without (like Hayek who preferred to leave it out)? jni 08:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See this diff for content I removed.  It was taken verbatim from this site, which is both not a reliable source and a possible copyright violation. -SpuriousQ (talk) 23:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unsourced content 
Talk:Geometric art

message: Rather than merging I think "Geometric Period" should be redirected to "Geometric Style", since the former leaves a lot to be desired from an encyclopedia article and contains nothing that isn't in "Geometric style" or the pages it links to. Twospoonfuls 08:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at both articles from the standpoint of a non-expert, I did the merge by the cut'n'paste method; the text actually contained very little overlapping information. Both are very lacking because they don't cite sources - which means that I have no possibility of verifying which is more correct. --Alvestrand 15:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since "Geometric art" encompasses Mondrian and Op Art, a better descriptive encyclopedia title for this article could be found.--Wetman (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I like the information but I think it would be helpful to have more picture examples of different phases of geometric pottery so the differences can be more clear. 
Protogeometric vase: https://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/tools/pottery/techniques/protogeometric.htm
Early geometric: https://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/tools/pottery/techniques/early-geometric.htm
Middle: https://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/tools/pottery/techniques/middle-geometric.htm
Late: https://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/tools/pottery/techniques/late-geometric.htm
Carsonsisk (talk) 22:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:Dillinger (1973 film)

message: It may be noted that, in the film's opening credits, 13 cast members are listed. Below is a reproduction of the form in which the cast is depicted:
               AAmerican International
SAMUEL Z. ARKOFF            Presents
DILLINGER
StarringWARREN OATES
BEN JOHNSON
     and introducingMICHELLE PHILLIPS
     Co-StarringHARRY DEAN STANTON
JOHN RYAN
RICHARD DREYFUSS
GEOFFREY LEWIS
ROY JENSON
STEVE KANALY
               andCLORIS LEACHMAN  as The Lady in Red
     FeaturingFRANK McRAEJOHN MARTINOREAD MORGAN
The on-screen closing credits, however, which list names of the same 13 cast members, indicate only the first three in the same order as the opening credits. Then, Cloris Leachman, who had 10th "and" billing in the opening credits, is listed 4th, Harry Dean Stanton, who received 4th billing in opening, is listed 5th, Geoffrey Lewis, who was 7th in opening, is now 6th, John Ryan, who had 5th place in opening, is 7th in closing, Richard Dreyfuss, who was 6th in the opening, is now 8th.
Steve Kanaly, who was in 9th place during opening, remains unchanged, John Martino, with 12th billing during opening, moves up to 10th, Roy Jenson, 8th in opening credits, is now 11th, Read Morgan, 13 and last in the opening credits, moves up to 12th and Frank McRae, billed 11th in the opening, is now last at 13. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast listing in the closing credits does not follow the same billing order as in the opening credits
Talk:Jeanie MacPherson

message: Following up on this statement, "She got her first real opportunity in 1913, when she wrote, directed, and starred in The Tarantula (1913)." I clicked on the link and lo and behold, MacPherson was nowhere to be found.  Looking at IMDB also reveals a lack oof her.  What are we to do? Carptrash (talk) 15:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay.  The link was to the wrong movie, but there is another folm with the same name, not on wikipedia. Carptrash (talk) 16:09, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This link does not upport the claim made 

message: No, she didn't. What nonsense.2A02:AA1:1624:A249:C4D5:5DBA:992B:8D91 (talk) 23:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  she became the youngest director in motion picture history
Talk:Biohydrogen

message: It is not possible, from this jumble of claims and details, to figure out what biohydrogen is, how it comes about (two damn enzymes), and the underlying energetics. If you are vested in this topic or have strong views, please leave a note. Otherwise I plan to remove most of the content.  Suggested organization:
*illustrative reactions (fermentation).  Sugars to carboxylic acids. one equation, one DeltaG.
*Mention some exotic stuff like photohydrogen production by the algal species. C.rheinhardtei.  briefly.
*Mention that these reactions are all catalyzed by 2 hydrogenases mediated by 4Fe clusters.
*list some of the organisms that rely on this pathway.
*not indicate that this technology is particularly promising.
Looking forward to being educated or corrected.
--Smokefoot (talk) 03:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs help