Talk:Wadge hierarchy

message: anyone mind if i update the "A Game for the Borel Functions" link in the references section?
the link doesn't work in dare.uva.nl 
it's my own work so i'm not sure whether this is a breach of etiquette  
(changing signature)
Drderevo (talk) 06:48, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: update reference

message: So there are several related topics that could plausibly be article titles:
*Wadge's lemma
*Wadge reducibility
*Wadge hierarchy
*Wadge determinacy
plus the existing one, Wadge degree.
I think they make perhaps two or three articles, with one "central" or "primary" one that introduces the subject and links to the "secondary" one(s) for more details. What I don't believe is that Wadge degree is the natural choice for the "central" article; I'd think that would be Wadge hierarchy, to show the big picture.
Just a thought for anyone (including me) who might be adding to this article—keep the big picture in mind, even if some of it is currently missing (that is, redlinks). Don't try to force everything under the title Wadge degree just because that's the article that currently exists. --Trovatore 16:33, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: organization

message: On second thought, I have my doubts that there's the necessary editor commitment to make more than one article anytime soon (certainly, there's not from me). All topics should probably be at least touched on at Wadge hierarchy, and we can make redirects-with-possibilities for them, to be expanded into articles if anyone gets ambitious. If Wadge degree itself were to be turned into an article, it should probably be about something like the fine analysis of Wadge degrees done by Louveau. --Trovatore 16:49, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: went ahead and moved it

message: Wadge game is just a stub that is better as section in this article.  I propose a merge with a redirect.  Alternatively, fill out the stub and make it a real article.  davidwr 09f9(talk) 15:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger: fold [[Wadge game]] into this article 

message: I made some improvements (I think) to the page.  My knowledge of the Wadge hierarchy is a bit limited and possibly incorrect, so someone with more experience should take a look.Daniel Walker 15:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: I just reorganized most of what I wrote earlier and added a little more. I apologize for any mistakes. I'm also removing the tags since I think (1) there are enough references, and (2) I tried to format everything. Since I'm new at wiki I'm not sure if this is good style so feel free to add tags again or make changes. I also thought from "references" you should be able to find most of the statements, and further reading is the rest, that's why I regrouped it. Does somebody want to write a page about "Rabin degree" etc? I don't know what it is... If not, would it be better to delete the links?
What about "Wadge degree" for a title? It seems that the word "hierarchy" suggests it's well founded (which is only the case in Baire space (and Cantor space etc.) and if you assume enough determinacy), while "degree" sounds more general to me...  --Miaoku 02:22, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes