Talk:Fault tree analysis

message: This page was created to give a higher amount of detailed FTA information than could be realistically provided in safety engineering. Here's the plan of information to be added:
# Links to relavent pages
# Reduction in FTA detail in safety engineering article and incorporate of links to fault tree analysis
# Diagrams of event types
# Diagrams of gate types
# Explanation of cutsets and minimal cutsets
# Discussion on some of the advantages and disadvantages of FTA versus other methods
Colin H 22:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plan for expansion

message: The figure does not conform to standard FTA usage. The inputs and outputs should be events. In particular, the top output should be "Top Undesired Event" or the like, not "Subsystem A".
Van Parunak (talk) 17:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Figure

message: The fifth paragraph under History is a mess -- the Software discussion takes over in an almost incoherent way.  Someone with specific knowledge of FTA, its relationship with Software, and a grasp of English should address that paragraph. Picojeff (talk) 19:27, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: History section

message: I've added it to WikiProject Systems and upgraded it to a C-class article; the article is well-referenced and has good supporting materials. I'd recommend taking it through a B-class review, which I may do myself if I have time, but I'll gladly defer to anyone with subject knowledge. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 10:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: Given that the Priority AND gate requires a conditioning event to specify the priority sequence, wouldn't it therefore include a side branch by default (i.e. in the same way as the Inhibit gate)? Does it need to be added? — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 11:35, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priority AND gate 

message: After a further read of the rest of the article, I've noticed that "History" is the only section that is well-cited; others are mostly or entirely uncited. I've tagged it for  for the other sections to have added citations. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 09:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged for refimprove 

message: Noticed a link to theriac.org in the text leads to a 404 now.  Someone more knowledgeable in this subject than I should see if those materials are available elsewhere and update the links.
I don't want to remove the broken links without giving them a fair chance to be redirected to a working set of content.173.250.185.124 (talk) 22:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refeshing old/dead links 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Fault tree analysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723124816/http://www.fault-tree.net/papers/ericson-fta-history.pdf to http://www.fault-tree.net/papers/ericson-fta-history.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090419200036/http://www.fault-tree.net:80/papers/long-beauty-and-beast.pdf to http://www.fault-tree.net/papers/long-beauty-and-beast.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified