Talk:Segi (organization)

message: Hey. I'm okay with the removal of three of the four links that Escorial82 removed. The only link I'm wondering about is this one. I understand it's a partisan source, but it does validate that SEGI is part of the Basque youth movement. Listing it in that context seems acceptable to me, but I'm wondering what the counterargument is. — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 17:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like maybe it's more appropriate as a reference than a link (even if it is a primary or unreliable source). --Cheeser1 (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third opinion 

message: Four links have been removed and re-added to this page a number of times - the ones listed in this edit. It seems that those links violate WP:EL, but two users (one of whom potentially shopped for the other?) disagree. Should the four links remain on the page, or do they break EL? — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 22:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "several opinions citing the parts of WP:EL, name them? Who are they? Now I know it can not be Escorial82, because we were discussing WP:RS. I also know it is not La voz de su amo, because they too were discussing WP:RS. So who was discussing WP:EL, well there was me. Then there was HelloAnnyong, who said they went against WP:EL, and pointed to this being the reason. Now the links were at the time, not used as sources, so that one is out the window. They also linked to #12 "Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority." Now if you look at the "blog" you will see it is not a personal "blog" but is in fact used by a recognized group. So who else is there, well BigDunc is there, and they think they should be used. So who dose that leave? Yes, Cheeser1, who says "several opinions citing the parts of WP:EL. Several meaning  HelloAnnyong and  Cheeser1 obviously being the other.  Now we also have this comment  "(as others have suggested)" by Cheeser1. One question, who are the others, apart from HelloAnnyong that is? --Domer48 (talk) 23:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

text: "There are a number of opinions about these links, and many cite WP:EL as prohibiting them..." (talk). In light of the above Cheeser1, can you explaine who this "number" and "many" are?--Domer48 (talk) 00:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you here to write an encyclopedia, or are you here to pick a fight? You need to seriously cool it. --Cheeser1 (talk) 02:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment 

message: Shouldn't this article be at SEGI? That's what it is referred to throughout the article. Comments? -R. fiend (talk) 20:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. I corrected the references throughout the article. --Javierme (talk) 23:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: What exactly dose the tag on the top of the article mean. Will someone actually check it? The reason I ask, is that the references do not reflect what is on the article, and some of the references appear in Spanish and Frence, when English versions exist for the same ones. I will put it on my to do list, but if the question I pose at the start could be answered it would be helpful. --Domer48 (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  nominated to be checked for its neutrality. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Segi (organization). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070514044414/http://www.rte.ie/news/elections2007/youthparties.html to http://www.rte.ie/news/elections2007/youthparties.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified