Talk:Minorities Research Group

message: The peer review request above isn't complete, just FYI. IvoShandor 15:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it since it went to GA review anyway. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 17:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is well written.
#:a (prose):  b (structure):  c (MoS):  d (jargon): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (inline citations):  c (reliable):  d (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
#Pass/Fail: 
#:a Well written: 
#:b Factually accurate: 
#:c Broad in coverage: 
#:d NPOV: 
#:e Stable: 
#:f Images: 
#:g Overall: 
If the article failed the nomination, the comments below will help in addressing the problems. Once these tasks are accomplished, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  If you feel that this review is in error, please feel free to take it to a GA review. You can see how I, personally, applied the six criteria above at this link. I sincerely thank you for your work so far.
If your article passed the nomination, congratulations on making Wikipedia all the better. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. If you didn't know there is a groovy user box, , for those users who have significantly contributed to a good article. The "essay" linked above is also how the criteria are applied to passing articles as well. Thanks again for your hard work.
Review by: IvoShandor
 
IvoShandor 16:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most excellent. I will look forward to reading and reviewing the results. : ) IvoShandor 16:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

text: *Missing "the" and the mag title should be italicized not in quotations. Good luck with the article : ) IvoShandor 16:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and make sure you merge any one sentence/really short paragraphs. IvoShandor 16:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What the GA review would look like

message: On hold expired, concerns not met. IvoShandor 17:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA failed

message: The chapter on Esme Langley shold not better go into the article on Esme Langley?--Dia^ 13:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Esme Langley

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Minorities Research Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927023234/http://www.gerberhart.org/dob.html to http://www.gerberhart.org/dob.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312072844/http://www.knittingcircle.org.uk/jackieforster.html to http://www.knittingcircle.org.uk/jackieforster.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312072844/http://www.knittingcircle.org.uk/jackieforster.html to http://www.knittingcircle.org.uk/jackieforster.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)