Talk:PlainTalk

message: :Image:Speech Recognition status.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Speech Recognition status.png

message: Do we really need information about AUTO's character in WALL-E here? It contains some information which may be seen as spoilers, and in my opinion, all it really needs to say is that the character uses MacInTalk for its voice. Flarn2006 (talk) 02:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WALL-E spoiler 

message: MacinTalk or MacInTalk? The article can't seem to decide. - dcljr (talk) 08:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on searching Apple's own website, it seems that it is properly "MacinTalk" with a lowercase "i". Additional occurrences with lowercase "i": the filenames of MacinTalk extensions seen in this screenshot, and a HyperCard stack by Nigel Perry.  (Search results with the uppercase "I" usage seem to be in regard to it being credited in music and movie productions.) – BrianKrent (talk) 10:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case 

message: The article discusses both speech synthesis and speech recognition.  It should be either divided or retitled.  (By the way, my edits were dictated on OS 10.9.) 184.18.45.118 (talk) 00:16, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: Why are some references clickable and some not? 184.18.45.118 (talk) 00:25, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clickable reference? 

message: When we lived in Arcata,CA in the mid '90s, there was a radio DJ who was a Vietnam veteran who had lost his voice to Agent Orange, but he used MacinTalk (as he referred to it) to make his announcements. He used the standard 'Fred' voice, but he had it reading a highly customized script for a much more natural sound than we could easily get on our Macs at home.
I don't remember if he was on KMUD or KHUM, but he had the afternoon show and was known as "Digital Dan, the DJ with a chip."
I've been looking for references to him online, but I haven't found any sources of information about him. He was a delight to listen to and had a great sense of humor.
Leeeoooooo (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  radio 

message: When I do a Google search for 'Apple PlainTalk' I see that it is used exclusively  to refer to the speech synthesis technology in much earlier versions of Mac OS. Apple's developer library calls the technology/feature Speech Synthesis in OS X. Perhaps that'd be a more suitable title. Or better yet,
* Speech Synthesis in Mac OS
would encompass Mac OS 7 to OS X 10.10 (all versions of the OS that have speech synthesis). 
The article also covers speech recognition. I agree with Talk:PlainTalk#Scope. If the article is not divided, a more possible title is
* Speech Synthesis and Recognition in Mac OS
Wickedjargon (talk) 02:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change article title? 

message: Synthesised Mac voices are ALSO used in OMD’s Atomic Ranch: from their album, English Electric
Cuddy2977 (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Music 

message: I am curious to whether MacSpeak, seen in the film Blank Check, is a variation of PlainTalk as there is a link to this article in Blank Check (film) and the film is mentioned under In Popular Culture in this article. I have tried searching for MacSpeak on Google and the results tend to turn out synthetic voice software from Apple. According to Macintosh Repository, MacSpeak is the original speech synthesizer app that Steve Jobs used to make the mac 128k demo. However, the article is short and it misspells synthesizer as "sythsizer". Considering Blank Check is a comedy film, MacSpeak could be a parody of PlainTalk or MacinTalk. Tk420 (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MacSpeak? 

message: The Apple PlainTalk Microphone, which used the extended proprietary 3.5 mm connector, came only in the "half-oval" form factor (see here). The round Apple microphone, known as the Apple Omnidirectional Microphone, preceded the PlainTalk and used only a standard 3.5 mm connector. It never used the extended connector, despite what this article currently says under the Hardware section. Illinois347 (talk) 03:53, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardware: Apple PlainTalk Microphone vs Apple Omnidirectional Microphone 

message: Why remove it?? It helped make MacinTalk/PlainTalk more recognizable. FlapjackRulez (talk) 21:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to "In Popular Culture"?