lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ruby Walsh

message: Any idea? Spiderone (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: His birth name is Rupert. Off the top of my head I believe he is nicknamed after his grandfather, Ted Walsh's dad, who was also known as Ruby.--Bcp67 (talk) 14:00, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why has he got a girl's name? 

message: In the infobox it says 2700+. Surely we can be more precise than that. A Racing Post article has it at 2,756 wins over jumps in Britain & Ireland. That is not his full total however as this does not appear to include National Hunt Flat wins aka Bumpers. His first win (Siren Song) & his first Cheltenham Festival winner (Alexander Banquet) fall into that category. The total from the Racing Post article also does not appear to include his wins in Japan, Australia & USA. Below is the Racing Post article. I hope someone finds a more precise one for the total wins.
• https://www.racingpost.com/news/ruby-walsh-a-phenomenal-career-in-numbers/378652
(78.17.77.71 (talk) 15:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: His stats page on the RP  shows totals of 776 for GB "jumps" (NHF, Hurdle & Chase), and 1991 Irish "jumps" (same basis), making a combined GB & I total of 2767 NH winners - so must be 11 bumper winners amongst that. Agree that there is no figure anywhere for his non-GB & I winners (also has had winners in France I think),  but at least we can give a clear total for his GB & I NH winners. --Bcp67 (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Exact number of winners

message: Joki training centre. 89.19.88.21 (talk) 17:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business services in South America.
Talk:Montgomery Atwater

message: The Wikipedia header regarding list of references is not helpful in this case, it elicits help or improvement where none is needed. The only references are indeed cited in the article. The list of what is presumed to be references are, in fact, a bibliography of the books written by the author in question. There is no need for these to be cited within the article. Please remove the confusing header regarding references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.193.144.218 (talk) 18:25, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Boob Darling

message: Wouldn't it be more appropriate to title the article "Bernard Darling" as opposed to a nickname? Make boob redirect of course.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.104.224.226 (talk) 04:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disrespectful article name?
Talk:Tess Harding

message: Could somebody maybe add a picture of Tess to the profile, I would do it myself but I can't, I don't know how to do it. So maybe someone could explain that to me as well lol.
:I added a picture to the infobox and performed a full copy edit on the article. By the way, please make sure to sign your talk page posts. Thanks --*momoricks* (talk) 07:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Tess
Talk:Rune Hauge

message: Svenskene betalte Hauge i skatteparadis – Inte alls OK
::Rune Hauge-selskap dukker opp i papirer fra  Mossack Fonseca
:::Salgo60 (talk) 10:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  He is in the news - [[Mossack_Fonseca|Mossack Fonseca]]
Talk:House vs. God

message: should we add that house won? xD
maybe under a "spoiler" tab or something
don't remember exactly but i think it ended with 
House - 4
God     - 0
(also could someone confirm that score?)
Divinity76 (talk) 16:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  House won. 
Talk:International Ship and Port Facility Security Code

message: There is a page under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISPS_code which seems to be referring to the same article. Should those pages be merged, cleaned and/or redirected?  Kostas 21:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thanks. --Pesco (talk) 05:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Chittagong port not save for DG cargo.. 58.145.189.246 (talk) 16:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Chittagong port DG cargo..
Talk:Rusty Hilger

message: This page needs to be either removed or completely edited.  It's self promotional and lists his email  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.197.135.217 (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Major cleanup has taken place. Night Ranger (talk) 16:50, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carretera Austral

message: The Carretera Austral is not known as "Carretera Presidente Pinochet". If you look in new maps, you will notice that the name is always carretera austral, and not carretera presidente pinochet. 
The web page profesorenlinea.cl does not have correct and reliable information about Augusto Pinochet. You can find false information like:
- "The militar coup was due to the people's clamor" (incorrect or inexact)
- You cannot find the word "Dictator" in the web page, a typical error from the extreme-right thinkers, that state that Pinochet was a "President" (tourismechile also said "presidente Pinochet. Is it an extreme-right website ?comment add by 212.23.175.190 (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  These sites (,  and this map) mention the name Carretera Pinochet.212.23.175.190 (talk) 15:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

message: The article says there are three ferries, but in fact there are four.  The ferry listed as the second crossing, for 5 hours, is actually two different ones, connected by a very short road section of perhaps 10.3 kilometres; the third ferry ride is very short to Galeta Gonzalo.  The ferry listed as the third appears to be at least the fourth, and as time goes on as I trace the route on Google Earth, I might find another. GBC (talk) 21:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A fourth ferry
Talk:Riemann-Stieltjes Integral

message: If I just wrote a paper on the Riemann-Stieltjes integral for my math class and it got a perfect score from my professor, is there something I could do with it? The url I uploaded it to is []. I've only begun trying to contribute to Wikipedia, so I'm just trying to not make any blunders. Anastas5425 21:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Inchgarvie

message: Hmm.. I'd contend the island 'looking like a battleship', especially given the draft of a battleship and the proximity to the bridge. the similarity of Inchmickery to a battleship is remarkable in silhouette, but I'm not sure that's really the case for Inchgarvie. njan 21:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps a wooden ship of the line rather than a steel steam-powered battleship is what it looks like.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Democracy (video game)

message: Is this a video game or a board game? SharkD 21:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Type of game?

message: This wiki currently reads like an advert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.169.54 (talk) 14:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert 
Talk:Ryan Heckman

message: I noticed that a well referenced version of the article was removed. Then an IP user updated text without references which remains in article. I am restoring the referenced version of the article. The references do back up the content but if there are any issues, I can try to research and update the references. Please discuss or use Help:Reverting#Manual reverting of content which is objectionable. --Servk Rezra (talk) 11:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referenced version
Talk:Ryan Karp

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.wickedlocal.com/medway/news/x1621242121/Medway-s-Karp-works-hard-to-make-fitness-fun?zc_p=2. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 20:31, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:East Hanover School District

message: Should the Board of Education be listed? 67.81.170.159 21:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Darkness to Light

message: Can someone change the title of the article? I don't know how to do this. The album's name is "Darkness to light" (without "From"). Best regards.--31.18.22.126 (talk) 19:38, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: can be obtained from http://www.rock.co.za/files/sweetsmoke.html#dark. BNutzer 21:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release information
Talk:Ellesmere Park

message: A very large part of this article has been copied and pasted from the Ellesmere Park Residents Association Web site at http://www.epra.freeuk.com/history.htm
Unless anyone wants to undertake rewriting it I think that material needs to be deleted. ---- Eric 21:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General

message: Eccles' history is Eccles' history.
This is an article about Ellesmere Park, not Eccles, so I deleted the history of Eccles. ---- Eric 21:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Was there ever an Ellesmere House? That section seems to be just a list of the occupations of various residents of Ellesmere Park. Is that really notable? ---- Eric 21:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ellesmere House
Talk:Gavorkna Fanfare

message: could someone please explain to me how this article "is not written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article"? i dont see why.
2019Oct21 - I'd be glad to. For one, the body of the article is not the place to give your opinion on what you think the composer was thinking when he wrote the music. I know Jack Stamp, have spoken with him, and what you said is not what he had in mind when he wrote Gavorkna Fanfare. Secondly, you don't speak about the composition much at all; you spend most of your time talking about what you thought of the composition. Open a book of program notes and see what Stamp said about the piece. For one, he made up the word "Gavorkna." He wrote the fanfare in two days (for Eugene Corporon). It has a fugato in the B section. Do some homework and make this article better than it is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArcaJeth75 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the inteview where Stamp called his fictional Gavorkna name "a joke". At least keep that part in, otherwise it's obvious to readers that you are trying to hide something and give the piece more gravitas and authenticity than it originally intended.  https://windliterature.org/2023/12/17/gavorkna-fanfare-by-jack-stamp/ Jesuspectre (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Aspergilium

message: Is an aspergilium the same as Aspergillum? Should the two articles be merged? -Phoenixrod 21:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I believe they are the same, and they should be combined. If you have time, please do; otherwise, I'll try to get to that sometime soon. Thanks for catching that. Sarum blue 21:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged to Aspergillum.--ShelfSkewed Talk 17:39, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Same as aspergillum?
Talk:1964 College World Series

message: This content was copied from the Baseball-Reference.com Bullpen without attribution.  The Bullpen is a wiki site that allows copying, but only with attribution.  I suspect that other CWS results pages were likewise copied. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.92.112.144 (talk) 20:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from the Baseball-Reference.com Bullpen
Talk:Black, Hawthorn & Co

message: We seem to have two different pages: Black, Hawthorn & Co and Black, Hawthorn & Company.  I suggest they be merged.  Biscuittin 21:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have copied parts of the text from Black, Hawthorn & Company to Black, Hawthorn & Co.  The latter is the more detailed article and I intend to convert the former to a Redirect page to avoid duplication. Biscuittin 18:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Black, Hawthorn & Company

message: We seem to have two different pages: Black, Hawthorn & Co and Black, Hawthorn & Company.  I suggest they be merged.  Biscuittin 21:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have copied parts of the text from Black, Hawthorn & Company to Black, Hawthorn & Co.  The latter is the more detailed article and I intend to convert the former to a Redirect page to avoid duplication. Biscuittin 18:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Infobox law school

message: A tinny request for inserting|free_lebel=|free =
section will be helpful to each and every law school in this world.Even Template:Infobox School allowed this field. --Kulbhushan Jhadav (talk) 03:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Free lebel, Free field 

message: The parent parameter of this template currently displays as "Parent college." That is likely incorrect or misleading (or just awkward and bumbling) in most cases. "Parent institution" is a much better way of handling this (as is done in the university infobox). ElKevbo (talk) 05:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parent parameter should display as "Parent institution" and not "Parent college" 

message: Does anyone know why the religious affiliation parameter is not displaying at Ave Maria School of Law? ElKevbo (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious affiliation parameter not displaying at [[Ave Maria School of Law]] 

message: Change 1 - USNWR ranking. This is biased and should be open to any legitimate ranking systems, especially those not in the US or alternative rankings in the  US. Changed USNWR Ranking to just "Ranking".
Change 2 - Added Tuition label for annual tuition review, very important to graduate school choices.
Lawgeek1 (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please get consensus for this change before using the edit request template. If you want to show how the new code works, copy the current template code to the sandbox and then make your suggested edits there. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 9 November 2023
Talk:List of Naruto episodes (seasons 1–2)

message: I've recreated this talk page for the purposes of the FLC, and because it was inappropriate to put the  template on the top of Talk:List of Naruto episodes. Feel free to improve the article to have it meet featured list standards. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 04:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FLC

message: How exactly are the seasons determined? They don't match up with the opening themes or years. The appear to consist of 26 episodes each, but even then there are exceptions. Besides, why 26 episodes?
Most of the Japanese sources I've seen either don't split them up into any sort of seasons, or split them up by year. --JadziaLover (talk) 15:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Determining the seasons 

message: There has been no reason to keep season 1 and season 2 combined in an article and since it makes the lead excessive long, I propose splitting the page into List of Naruto episodes (season 1) and List of Naruto episodes (season 2). 
The organization also makes it confusing, as the original Japanese products divided the series in 5DVD series rather than the current one of nine seasons. This is TV Tokyo's listing:
*1st Stage (episodes 1-35)
*2nd Stage (episodes 36-83)
*3rd stage (episodes 84-131)
*4th stage (episodes 132-183)
*5th stage (episodes 184-220)
Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I made brief drafts from the unnamed season 1 and season 2 "2nd stage" on User talk:Tintor2/ draft and User:Tintor2/Sandbox 2-2, respectively. I still need to work more in the second season's draft, but should I make the split, I'll have to wait until making the other seasons to avoid conflicts.Tintor2 (talk) 21:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:List of Naruto episodes (seasons 3–4)

message: I've removed the redirect from this talk page for the FLC. Please improve this article in any fashion possible. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 21:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FLC

message: How exactly are the seasons determined? They don't match up with the opening themes or years. The appear to consist of 26 episodes each, but even then there are exceptions. Besides, why 26 episodes?
Most of the Japanese sources I've seen either don't split them up into any sort of seasons, or split them up by year. --JadziaLover (talk) 15:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Determining the seasons 

message: I looked on this page and I noticed that there isn't an episode 78 summary. What happened to it?
:Restored. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 16:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 78? 

message: "note- when first aired on cartoon network the episode was blocked " Source? Also, "Blocked" isn't the correct term here...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.89.179 (talk) 16:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 80
Talk:Myocardial rupture

message: I don't have time at the moment to work on this article.  However, some interesting references include: , , , , . Ksheka 21:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the first three of these so far.Ksheka 01:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I added the other two of these references.Ksheka 12:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Template talk:Infobox school/Archive US school

message: I looked at the list of Education infoboxes, and there are about half a dozen American school infoboxes that give largely identical information. I think it would be a good idea to merge all of these into Template: Infobox Education in the United States, because they're almost exactly the same and aren't specific to any one specific type of American school. I propose merging the following infobox templates into Template: Infobox Education in the United States:
*Template:Infobox HighSchool
*Template:Infobox HighSchool (American)
*Template:Infobox VirginiaHighSchool
*Template:Infobox K-12 School
*Template:Infobox US school
*Template:Infobox middle school
Also, does anyone have experience with merging templates? How will infoboxes appear when the template for them no longer exists under the same name? Will a redirect on the deleted pages be enough to fix it? Tserton 20:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Cylindrical Energy Module

message: I was thinking about having 3 sections: Pumps, Engine, and Applications. Though without much information except for the EP Industries website I don't know what else to go by. Any ideas? Or is it better to leave it as is, with all the info bungled up together? -Goney3 21:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page layout: 

message: What works better? More pictures, facts, or commentary? Am I the only editor of this article? Where did all the mechanical engineers go? -Goney3 21:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content: 

message: Add your views and opinions here please. -Goney3 21:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts on the CEM:
Talk:Myōjin-shō

message: Please don't ask me to choose between these. I have no idea about Japanese pronunciation, and indeed I created the article to fill in a redlink. One to take up with WP:WPJ. Totnesmartin 21:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Myōjin-Shō, Myōjin-shō, or Myōjinshō
Talk:Mike Pelyk

message: I've expanded this entry because it was clearly too brief. However, this might now be as detailed as it should be for Mr. Pelyk and perhaps should no longer be considered a stub. He was one of those players with enormous potential, but rarely realized. He had maybe 1 or 2 good seasons in the NHL when he, quite rightly, went to the WHA for a lot (for the time) of money. So based upon his career this might as detailed as it should get. 
I believe the stub status should be removed, but I'm not sure I'm experienced enough to know what qualifies as a "stub" to remove it myself. BashBrannigan (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Ethnic groups in Bosnia and Herzegovina

message: What is the criteria to include the corresponding ethnic groups on this article? --PaxEquilibrium 22:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a difficult question. BiH has not had an official census since 1991. I would go by the general believed ethnicities. The ones that are in the template right now are fairly correct. One thing that I think is different from Serbia is "Muslim by nationality". I think one would find those Muslims as declaring themselves as Yugoslav before simply saying they are Muslim. Officially, Muslims are Bosniaks according to the Bosnian-Herzegovinian government. Even if we were to take a census, maybe some towards the CG border, not many would declare themselves Muslim, instead Bosniak (which implies they are Muslim). Vseferović 23:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

text: If we were going solely on the 1991 census, I wouldn't have included Bosniaks, so I think we should leave it as it is, it seems like a good compromise to me. I mean, a few people probably still view themselves as Muslims, and we have no way of knowing they don't.--Hadžija 23:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course we cannot be sure, that is why I did not change it. The war has changed a lot of things. Had we all been Yugoslavs (i.e. Yugoslav Muslim, Yugoslav Orthodox, Yugoslav Christian...) after WWII, we might have still been a nation today. Vseferović 02:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I was asking to find out whether I could add the Roma people or not... --PaxEquilibrium 09:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason
Talk:Service-oriented provisioning

message: Article is a terminology definition of an important differences in network provisioning scenarios and should be qualified as a "stub".
Article categorised as stub.
: Please put that  tag back on the main article. It doesn't belong here. (Requestion 01:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Is "provisining" a specialist technical term - if so it needs to be defined. Or is it a mis-spelling of "provisioning"? Notinasnaid 11:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is no objection, I will move this article to "Service-oriented provisioning" --Richard 23:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Are these external links, or references? If they are references, there should be inline citations. The name is confusing because two very different sets of guidelines are applied by editors. Notinasnaid 11:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "External references"
Talk:Alf Pike

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only contains the basic information on the subject, and of low importance, as I do not feel than many people outside of hockey would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 21:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment