Talk:Breed registry

message: In the section on questionable registries referencing "at least one" which claims to recognize wild animal breed/species clubs and register wild animal individual specimens, I didn't give the example -- which is the IPBA, through their IPEBA subsidiary.  Three reasons:  one, the IPBA wants to do this, but apparently has had no luck actually doing so; two, didn't want to target the IPBA because there's surely some other group(s) out with the same idea; three, to avoid attracting the IPBA's attention and possible revisionism. -- Lisasmall 18:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  questionable wild animal registry  

message: I don't think a registry is identical to a stud book, as this article implies... looking up breed registry on the web, it refers to organizations that either oversee one breed or oversee many breeds; they may sponsor shows and whatnot. A stud book is a stud book; "Stud book" should be a separate article, I think.--Hafwyn (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. A stud book is a tool for registry kept by a breed registry (organization). They are not one and the same. VanTucky 18:05, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I also agree, and have been meaning for a while to do something about this redirect, but ... not a lot of time! Ealdgyth - Talk 18:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We could throw some verbiage in here to that effect as at least a temporary fix.  I'd be curious to see if the original stud book article had much in it.  If it sat around as a stub for ages, then it might have been appropriate to merge here.  Another thought is to expand the section specifically describing stud books as a subsection of a breed organization until or unless it gets ong enough to break back out again.  (though I could also argue that a horse is "registered" in a "stud book," and so there are some semantics that could be fussed over)  I guess I'm in no hurry to take this one on, but have no objection to some language in the article clarifying matters a bit.  Montanabw(talk) 02:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the major problems with this article as is, is that it is too dog and horse specific. For horses the registry and stud book may be synonymous, but there are some animals that have registries and standards, but no stud book for individual animals. So separating the two is a factor in keeping the article from focusing too much on horses. VanTucky 04:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing stopping anyone from expanding the article.  If the cat fanciers and whomever want to add to it, I see no problem with expanding the article to encompass various registries (there are cattle and sheep registries too), I just don't have the time or interest at the moment to do anything about it, personally.  I noticed that the purebred dog article uses the term "stud book", but I don't know the dog world, so no clue if that's correct for them or not.  "Stud book" is sort of colloquial within the horse world, pretty much all stud books are contained within a breed organization, so I am personally OK with keeping the term redirected here, but I also don't care all that deeply.  I guess my feeling is that if other animals feel dissed, it's their responsibility to nag their owners to edit wiki and fix it!  (LOL!)  Montanabw(talk) 05:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define "Breed registry" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Breed registry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051220184740/http://www.canadasguidetodogs.com:80/breedregistries.htm to http://www.canadasguidetodogs.com/breedregistries.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Breed registry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509145855/http://www.westminsterkennelclub.org/2008/results/bis/ to http://www.westminsterkennelclub.org/2008/results/bis/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303165505/http://heritagehogs.org/m/articles/view/Facts-about-our-registry to http://heritagehogs.org/m/articles/view/Facts-about-our-registry
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051220184740/http://www.canadasguidetodogs.com/breedregistries.htm to http://www.canadasguidetodogs.com/breedregistries.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified