lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Komsomolsk-on-Amur

message: AFAIK, the true beginning of Komsomol on Amur started with the politic oppositors sent by Stalin in the Gulags in 1930s in order to stop the Japanese invasion.
If anyone will verify this, he could add the information to the article. --82.58.202.136 21:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The city has been developed from small settlement in an industrial city for maintenance aviation and ship building in deep back in forthcoming war. At city building work of prisoners, only not political, but criminals was actively used.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.150.60.89 (talk) 06:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inquiry

message: Does anyone know the prerevolutionary name of the city? Cossack 18:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Permskoye.  I added it to the article.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous name

message: I am trying to fix up the Steel Yard article with the correct locations for the antennas. Can anyone locate the Komsomolsk-na-Amure antennas for me using Google Maps? Maury 20:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Radar antennas?

message: Look at the photo on the English page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Street_komsomolsk.jpg
Photo of the same house on the Russian page : http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%A3%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BA-%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%90%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B5.JPG
Replacing it is maybe a good idea?
- Crocodilicus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crocodilicus (talk • contribs) 18:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture this
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ali Sina

message: I'm not sure if this has ever been done... but what about semi protection policy for this one? It's just going to be a nuisance for admins to remove all delete votes that are from editors with one or two edits.  gren グレン 21:35, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, Gren. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ed Poor

message: Ed emailed me and asked me tell everyone "If nominated, I will not run. If elected, I will not serve."  This was because it occurred to me to write and ask him when I flagged this article as being a  candidate. SqueakBox 22:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I could close it but I'd prefer the people who started the RfA to do so.--Alabamaboy 21:52, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It will be closed 7 days from the time it was created unless Ed accepts. Doing anything otherwise violates policy, including all the voting that is taking place.Gateman1997 21:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The candidate hasnt accepted the nomination, or been active for a few weeks, and ithe nomination hasn't even been linked to the main WP:AfD page; it's not like it's really following policy as it is.  Joyous | Talk 22:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not supposed to be linked to the main page UNTIL the user accepts.Gateman1997 22:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Why are people voting is my question. This is valid ONCE he accepts. However voting is supposed to wait until he's accepted and it's placed on the main page.Gateman1997 22:14, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I have protected this page. There is no reason for anyone to 'vote' here, since Ed has no accepted. This is becoming an RfC by any other name, without the subject here to deal with it. I would not object to a deletion, in the manner of an uncertified RfC. -Splashtalk 22:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I didn't read the talkpage of this before adding to the article. I've stated my reasons for why I don't want Ed to be an administrator. Why not just delete this whole thing to let the process be done correctly? --ScienceApologist 22:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Ed Poor has indicated above that he wants it archived. And there is no process to be done correctly, since Ed Poor has indicated quite clearly that he will not presently accept a nomination. -Splashtalk 22:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this RFA wasn't supposed to be publically voted or listed until Ed accepted per RFA procedure. A few users jumped the gun, it's no reason to delete it. However since Ed has turned down the RFA officially then we can now archive it.Gateman1997 22:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the clarification. If this page does go live some day, will it be on this page or will a new one be created? --ScienceApologist 22:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably a new one created. Assuming Ed ever wants his job back but as of now he's left the project in disgust so it may be a while.Gateman1997 22:53, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but I would like to be informed when/if a new page is created because I have a personal stake in what I considered to be abuse of admin powers by him against me before he was desysopped. If a new page is created, can I get somebody to let me know on my talkpage? --ScienceApologist 22:57, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected
Talk:Stability Pact for Southeastern Europe

message: *in the EU: industrial - ?, domestic - ?
*in the SEE-Energy market: industrial - 2009, domestic - 2015 ?
*in the Common Energy Community: ?
Alinor 21:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline for energy liberalisation 

message: This page needs to be updated, but I don't know what happens with the treaties SiM signed... —Nightstallion (?) 06:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Montenegro

message: Serbia and Montenegro need to be separated. If I correct, Montenegro took over all SiM treaties if not new treaty concluded. After entering into force new CEFTA agreement (1 May 2007), the matrix has to be updated accordingly.Beagel 18:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Matrix of the Free Trade Agreements in the region

message: If the European Union is mentioned, shouldn't the UN be as well?  The link to the actual Stability Pact's web page mentions the UN. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lost puppies (talk • contribs) 04:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The UN 

message: Japan is missing on the map. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 00:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan
Talk:Louis XV of France

message: This redirect is just plain absurd; what other Louis XV is there??? Bill 21:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sears Directors Cup

message: This covers the same event as NACDA Director's Cup.  It's probably worth keeping since many people know it under the older ("Sears Cup") name and there is a historic interest in the old name for the event.  I have added a cross-reference between the two pages. Slapshot24 21:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: see below. djharrity 01:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Recommend that this article be merged into the NACDA Director's Cup article and a REDIRECT be provided to the existing Sears Directors Cup page.  It would still allow a user to type in Sears Directors Cup and be directed (actually re-directed) to the current name of the cup. djharrity 01:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Sears Directors Cup
Talk:United Front for Democratic Change

message: Here is my translation of the communiqué announcing the formation of this group. The French original is here: . I apologize for the length of this message but I thought it might be useful to future editors since it seems no English translation is readily available elsewhere.
--Cam 21:56, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Per my suggestion, the communiqué has been moved to User:KI/Temp. The specific version of KI/Temp is here. KI 04:01, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text of the Dec. 28 communiqué 

message: Can anyone translate this? Or http://tchad-info.net/index.php?categorie=A this]? KI 04:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: French website

message: Is it really called F.U.C.? becuase that smacks of vandalism to me. --Riconoen 03:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FUC is simply an acronym of the movement's French name.--Aldux 10:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

text: If you think that's bad ... I've seen it listed as FUCD. In all seriousness. --UrsusMaximus 12:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  You can't be serious 

message: Any special reason for putting "president" etc. in quotes? UrsusMaximus 11:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why quotes for titles? 
Category talk:Sri Lankan people

message: Is there a difference between this category and its subcat Sri Lankans? NickelShoe 21:58, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Sri Lankans]]

message: I'm beginning the effort to move people out of this category and into more specific and more appropriate ones. --Hemlock Martinis 19:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diffusion
Talk:PPOX

message: According to , it is public domain. However  contradicts that... Hmmm... I am confused... --WS 21:58, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the copyvio tag as the genetic home reference is listed under Wikipedia:Public domain resources#Medicine. --WS 18:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Second Temporal Dimension

message: IMHO the article is somewhat confusing and lacks essential information. As I'm only tangentially informed on this topic, perhaps the problem is only with me. But let's enumarate:
* Is imaginary time axis really easily confused with second time axis?
* Imaginary time was common in QFT long before Hawking, see Osterwalder/Schrader etc (e.g. Wick rotation).
* There are severe conceptual problems with more than one time dimension, see Tegmark's paper
Pjacobi 22:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My gut impulse is to nominate this article for AfD. The only substantive content seems to be that some string theories have them, and that it occurs w.r.t. twistors. Now, some string thoeries have just about everything under the  sun, so that alone doesn't really merit much of an article. linas 17:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Strongly agree. Nimur 20:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

message: As Lumidek votes "non-bogus" I reluctantly volunteer to start a re-write and have started gathering some input. Nice exercise in in mental flexibility. But I'll mention all this stringy 10+2 and 26+2 stuff only in passing, someone more competent should enlarge that topic.
So far I've isolated those other inputs:
* Dirac's (Ann. Math. 37 (1936) 429) In 1936 Dirac invented a field theory approach for rewriting conformal field theory in four dimensions in a manifestly SO(4, 2) covariant form in six dimensions
* Penrose's Twistor theory
* Itzhak Bars (embedding (d-1)+1 space time in d+2 space time)
* Yakir Aharonov
* And for the fringe end: Heim Theory in 3+3 dimensions. Sort of.
Pjacobi 00:10, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'll attempt a rewrite 

message: Highly theoretical, at best; this article should make clear that this is a mathematical framework and has no experimental physical evidence; the theory does not even make any suggestions as to how a test could be performed.  This is a fringe theory - hardly mainstream even amongst physicists; I have no qualms classifying it as pseudoscience. Nimur 20:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ben Standeven has performed major article edits.  After these edits, the article is in much better shape than previously.  I am still wondering if a better solution would be a merge or redirect to the F-theory article; we can salvage all of these new edits and create a sub-section there. Nimur 13:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have merged the newly rewritten content to F-theory#Multiple dimensions Nimur 16:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:History of the Beatles

message: History of the Beatles used to be an article before it was moved to History of The Beatles, which now redirects to The Beatles. It could be deleted but it is not an implausible search term and it is very possible that someone may use this link in an article – many people write 'The Beatles' as 'the Beatles' in prose. I don't really think it should be deleted. McLerristarr / Mclay1 02:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion
Talk:Jennifer Whalen (cyclist)

message: this article created by a friend of jennifer whalen—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.41.212.162 (talk) 22:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Jennifer Whalen - results (source: USAC). At least some of these should be entererd into the main article after proper formatting. JFPerry 17:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Past results

message: The following addition by 70.57.25.238 was originally posted to the main article:
:P.S. While too modest to include it, Jennifer is also an inspiration to those lucky enough to meet her through her dedication to the pure spirit of cycling and the cyling community, in addition to being a living example of how fulfilling and worthwhile it can be to follow your passion and dreams.(disclaimer: this statement was added by an independent third party, but she's had it coming for quite a while).
I feel that the talk page is a more appropriate place for this note.
JFPerry 15:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments by 70.57.25.238 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Johnnie Bob (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Jennifer Whalen →  – The mountain biker definitely does not outnotable Jennifer Whalen (actress) for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC rights. I'm proposing a WP:TWODABS solution here rather than giving the actress the plain title, since the actress is mainly Canada-famous rather than world-famous, but it's quite clear that the mountain biker isn't more notable than the actress. Bearcat (talk) 17:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: With the added bonus that even some of the cyclist's views may also have been people who really wanted the actress. (I did catch a couple of inbound links here that were meant for the actress when I checked "what links here" before submitting this nomination.) Bearcat (talk) 17:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 July 2021
Talk:First Unitarian Society of Madison

message: There are other "First Unitarian Societies" in the US.  Should this article perhaps be renamed "First Unitarian Society (Madison)" and "First Unitarian Society" be made a disambiguation page? Gwimpey 22:22, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that'd be a right fine route to take. Canaen 00:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Should the title be First Unitarian Society (Madison)?

message: Since there is a claim that this is the largest UU congregation, I think the membership number should be added, with a citation.--Appraiser 17:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Size
Talk:Bharata (Ramayana)

message: Though the IAST may seem redundant; I included it because it is still useful, in my opinion, to differentiate it from भारत/Bhārat. Khiradtalk 22:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, this article seems to be good however, most of it needed to be removed because it contained content not supported by listed sources or references. Content on Wikipedia needs to be sourced. 
Another issue with the wording and style of the article is that it asserted doctrine as facts rather than made it clear these beliefs are held by a specific culture of religious group. Remember that Wikipedia is a place for the world to get knowledge and is not a text book written for the adherents of a specific religion. Writing the article in a neutral tone and style is really important to maintain the standard of the encyclopedia. →ὦiki-Coffee(talk to me!) (contributions) 09:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia's [[WP:NPOV]] Guidelines
Talk:Dr. Fritz

message: I am not happy with this name.  I think we should call Dr. Fritz what he is, a spirit or what believers deem to be a spirit.  Vogensen 22:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you think about this sentence: "Dr. Fritz is supposedly the spirit of a German surgeon dead on 1918 that is incorporated by psychic surgeons in Brazil." jggouvea 00:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, a tad biased for a website that is designed to produce neutrally submitted factual information.... SF  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.121.254 (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Arigo-John Grant Fuller  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.154.46 (talk) 01:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hypothetical German surgeon
Talk:Blood fetishism

message: Okay, so blood fetish is pretty real and sort of interesting, but this has been unreferenced for a few months now. Can't you source it? Soon, I will remove unsourced statements from this article. Lotusduck 20:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of original research 

message: I, personally, however, think this page could use a hefty boost, cha? --96.224.177.64 (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expandsion?
Talk:Weblogs, Inc./Archive 1

message: DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are
replying to if necessary.
Please add new archivals to Talk:Weblogs, Inc./Archive02. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. Interiot 22:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chisholm Trail

message: This was the picture box.  The picture has apparently been removed already, and the comment asking that it be replaced has no place within the article itself; editorial comments such as this belong here, on the discussion page.
If someone can provide an appropriate picture, please clean this and replace.  71.200.138.188 (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The picture no longer exists.  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 19:20, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this here 

message: Think might be a useful link...  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 19:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  News 
Talk:Pederasty in ancient Greece

message: I am nowhere near qualified to revise this entry, but it seems to be missing an extremely important recent source that challenges some of what is written here: James Davdison's The Greeks and Greek Love. Even if one disagrees, his book is important. 2603:6011:6144:1E4D:9C29:FA84:AB0F:B711 (talk) 18:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to revise 

message: I think that there are several pages about pederasty and ancient Greek relationships with boys. It makes more sense to conflate the pages. Norabur (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yes exactly! Norabur (talk) 03:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this merge with pederasty?
Talk:Messerschmitt

message: I was not aware that 'rare' and 'provisional' were synonyms for 'unsubstantiated' and 'unverified'. The person, who added the alleged aircraft to this article, is likely the same person that added it, and several other dubious marques, to List of military aircraft of Germany by manufacturer. He has been asked, several times, to provide satisfactory evidence of this aircraft and is yet to do so. Oboroten 22:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the Arthur Sack AS-6 is real enough - see this article - and was built with some Messerschmitt components. As for the AS-7 listed here, I have no idea. ericg ✈ 16:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: The article says the Bf. 108 "would soon be setting all sorts of records." Any word on what sorts? Examples? Sca (talk) 19:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Records

message: Why the Messerschmitt Me 109TL is listed under Other aircraft rather than in the table with the rest of the designs? Unless there is a valid reason, I'll move the entry to the table. Regards, DPdH (talk) 06:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messerschmitt Me 109TL... "Other"?
Talk:Coursing

message: MERGE this is a stub article that can be  with Hare coursing as they are related. SirIsaacBrock 22:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It's a stub. Coursing is primarily a hare related sport, the other animals "used" can be aded under hare coursingAndyinMN 22:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE 

message: Either way, that statement is not neutral. I've removed the statement until perhaps someone can provide support either way. Mikieminnow 11:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The best science I know is section 6.2.3.b.ii. at , referenced in the hare coursing article. It looks at 53 kills. While the figures are not laid out as well as might be, it suggests at least 77% of kills were quick. It also suggests that 18 of 53 kills were not by dogs but by handlers, suggesting some delay. It is not clear how many dogs suffered the "extremely painful" injury of being injured other than to the neck or chest. Certainly, photographic evidence on hares being "tugged" by two dogs suggests some pain. MikeHobday 12:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of the hare 

message: I tried to cite Montgomery, R. A., Raupp, J., Miller, S. A., Wijers, M., Lisowsky, R., Comar, A., ... & Hayward, M. W. (2022). The hunting modes of human predation and potential nonconsumptive effects on animal populations. Biological Conservation, 265, 109398.. I spent ten minutes trying to figure out how to cite this, and I've given up. 
I don't understand what to do with a ref that is a long ref, that has multiple authors, and what to do if there already is a  thing under references. I couldn't find a tool that converted Bibtex to Wikipedia's format. Richlitt (talk) 02:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing coursing in humans
Talk:IBM OfficeVision

message: I've worked in places where Office Vision ran under MVS. Perhaps this article needs an update? -- Commking 22:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: OfficeVision/MVS

message: I don't have any "real" IBM OfficeVision screen captures since I never used the program, but I have seen a book that feature the PROFS main menu. Is it OK to recreate a likeness using a word processor, or is that a copyright infringement type of deal? Would IBM get upset at something like:
PROFS Main Menu
Press one of the following PF keys.
PF1 CALENDARS Process calendars.
PF2 OPEN the MAIL
PF3 TELEPHONE Directories
PF4 NOTES, Process notes, messages
PF5 MAINTAIN all my NOTELOGS
PF6 CONTROL nicknames and distribution
PF7 REMINDERS
==> _
I got this from a screenshot of the 3270 Workstation Program from Jim Hoskins IBM Personal System/2: A Business Perspective.
I think there's more to the menu than what I can see there... there was a photocopy I made of a book about 3270 emulation, but I can't remember where it is right now.
--Jimj wpg 03:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: OfficeVision screenshot

message: The article notes the system started on VM, so was it EBCDIC? Then on OS/2, a system based on ASCII.  Then Japanese and Chinese, UNICODE?  Not clear 143.232.116.173 (talk) 18:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character set use not clear 

message: I noticed a possible vandalism or typo in one of the paragraphs in the article: 
"PROFSPROFS[12] and its e-mail component, known colloquially as PROFS Notes, featured prominently in the investigation of the Iran-Contra scandal. Oliver North believed he had deleted his correspondence, but the system archived it anyway. Congress subsequently examined the e-mail archives." 
I have never seen reference to a PROFSPROFS before, just PROFS. Does this need to be corrected? Jimj wpg (talk) 02:10, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, Jimj wpg. I suspect PROFSPROFS was a cut and paste error. It does not appear in the cited source, just PROFS. I corrected it in the article. Cheers, -- {Talk} 02:45, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "PROFSPROFS"?