lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Duramax V8 engine

message: Almost a dozen times now a IP user is forcing in a myth that is over 5 years old that the Duramax line is going to expand to more/all GM vehicles.  This page needs semi-protected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dana60Cummins (talk • contribs) 12:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth from 2006 getting forced in by IP user. 

message: The LLY description states that the LLY was "...GM's first attempt to implement emissions requirements on their diesel trucks."  This is not true.  The 6.2L diesel (produced in 1982) was offered with EGR on the California models (VIN code C).  The LB7 (first generation Duramax) also had EGR and a catalytic converter on California models.  The LLY was by no means the first engine to implement emissions equipment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheesecakepiebar (talk • contribs) 04:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  LLY Section 

message: The page on the Chevy Colorado claims that one of the two different "Duramax" I4 diesels it could be bought with was part of this engine family. At least one engine links to the page on Motori, and the other one links here. But I see nothing at all about I4s on this page, so I thought I'd bring it to someone's attention. AnnaGoFast (talk) 09:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Duramax I4" in Colorado pickup? 

message: "The LBZ is regarded as the best Duramax ever made." By whom? Sd31263 (talk) 17:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Duramax ever made?
Talk:Bend (knot)

message: And they use the word "bend" because.....?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.32.193.80 (talk) 08:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin of name? 

message: Closing quote with no matching opening quote in 2nd paragraph of intro section
71.199.14.42 (talk) 00:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: "A study of 8 different bends using climbing rope found that the Butterfly bend was strongest, but recommended the double fisherman's knot for being easier to untie.[1]" I checked the reference source and the double fisherman's was stronger than the butterfly in two of three types of rope tested. I could not find the statement about double fisherman's knot being easier to untie. This seems improbable as this knot is notoriously hard to untie.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harold14370 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate statement
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/James F. Jones

message: Somehow the notice that the article is being discussed for deletion was removed from the article itself.  Could someone more knowledgable than I restore that notice to the James F. Jones page? K95 18:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Restored. Thank you.--Húsönd 18:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Makhdum Shah

message: has proposed that new article Hazrat Shah Makhdum (R) be merged into longstanding article Shah Makhdum on the grounds that they are about the "same subject".
* Don't merge - There is an unfortunate similarity in names and occupations, but these are two different individuals. The new article, about someone active in the early 14th century, cites: . Although WP describes the subject of the older article as 14th-century, that appears to be a mix-up, because the main source () says he died in 1291 AD. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:42, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Lake Traverse Indian Reservation

message: Mention history of odd shape. Jidanni (talk) 09:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention treaty boundary points 

message: Old maps say Sisseton Indian Reservation. Mention that. Jidanni (talk) 09:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sisseton Indian Reservation 

message: "Unfortunately, a critical reference had been written as "miles and chains" in the Minnesota office, when it should have been written as "chains and links".    Consequently, the Seventh Standard Parallel across the reservation was drawn about two and a quarter miles south of where it should have been.
" Jidanni (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could mention grid 

message: Should there be a mention on this article of all the highways that go through the reservation? Such as I-29/U.S. 81, U.S. 12, and several state highways. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 22:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highways
Talk:Little Minnesota River

message: The GNIS database doesn't have a source for this river.  It only lists the point it enters Minnesota.  I updated the source from Google Maps. -- Talk to G Moore 13:27, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:Euro death-knot

message: It's good to give some alternatives, but one of the key reasons people use the EDK is precisely that it doesn't get stuck so much, because it's asymmetric and therefore rolls over edges and cracks. Citation no. 2. actually mentions this, so I've deleted the remark on the basis that it is unsubstantiated opinion (which I incidentally don't agree with!) Of course, if the previous claim can be verified, it should be reinserted.
Ben1983 (talk) 17:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternatives
Talk:Pembina Region

message: I moved the article per discussion from draft to the new name. There was a suggestion to use "region" but other articles like Pembina Valley Region, Black Dirt Region, Calumet Region, as well as Columbia Basin dictate the current name. Otr500 (talk) 21:07, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved article from draft 

message: This article has continued unassessed but has actually surpassed "start-class". I am going to assess it as "C-class" and any concerns can be addressed from that point. Otr500 (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article classification
Talk:Rapid Creek (South Dakota)

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—42.60.54.117 (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article. I've tweaked them a bit, but if you still think that there is an error, you'll need to supply a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 00:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Terry Jones' Barbarians

message: I did not place the cleanup banner but I did place the advert banner.  This article is little more than a list of episode titles with a "press release" tacked on at the end.  A press release has NO place in an encyclopedia article.  It should be removed, and what remains should be reduced to a stub until someone has time and knowledge to expand this meaningfully.  Agreed? 12.22.250.4 19:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorial banners 

message: IMDB mentions a second season. Could anyone shed light on this?
212.123.157.105 (talk) 20:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 2 

message: I saw this documentary and found it very infomative, and the information seemed credible.  Nontheless, I wonder if there are any criticisms from scholars who feel the series fundamentally misrepresents facts or is biased in some way.  I'd love to hear the debate, if there is any...72.78.6.125 (talk) 10:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the docu to be lacking, and also disinformative. Saying that Caesar conquered Gaul to take control of their goldmines is conjecture; also during the docu "the Celts", using wrong dates, 54A.D. instead of 54 B.C., is very unprofessional. Nathraq (talk) 15:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Over the line anti-Catholic bigotry and a complete misunderstanding of what the Greek word "barbarian" means (someone who cannot speak the common tongue -Greek for the Hellenes, Latin for the Romans) . Interviews with experts do not have opposing views presented and the historical facts are often mixed-up or over-simplified (eg. Gauls and Celts do not mean the same the thing, the Romans did not have "knights"). I'll try to find an academic review, but most are bloggers or on Amazon.
174.102.232.65 (talk) 13:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism? 

message: Take a look at the Episode descriptions, somebody's 'aving a laugh 2601:986:8002:EDB0:4869:F643:79D0:60E0 (talk) 19:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/A M. Khan

message: Dear Administrator / Clerk
Kindly, allow me to defense myself, whenever you are going to make any decission.
I will satisfy you, that who infact is Vandaliser and who is the master-mind of this whole drama.
I have many things to prove, for example, just take an example of article Akhtar Munir Marwat. I was the one who posted a deletion tag for the article for the second time.
Like this, there are many things that have nothing to do with me. Except being sorry for his guilt's the user: Marwatt has always been rude to me.
Stick, wherever I mentioned, means the stick (wooden-stick), I also hjave cleared myself on the Talk Page of user: Addhoc, even there was nothing to clarify about.
Kindly make justice.
Regards,
A M. Khan 18:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:Sacha Baron Cohen

message: In Cohen's entire filmography intended to go into this template? He was in several other films recently. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 18:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion

message: Colors haven't enough contrast. I'll fix this as soon the template is unprotected. —surueña 10:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done —surueña 21:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors

message: Should The 11 O'Clock Show be included as that was his big break and where Ali G first appeared? Dunarc (talk) 20:18, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 11 O'Clock Show
Talk:Adil Shah Suri

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: This page should not be speedy deleted because it's highly likely the other site copied the text from Wikipedia and not vice versa. --Folantin (talk) 19:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I replied here, as the issue is identical for both pages. Yoenit (talk) 19:57, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I withdraw my objection, although we do need an article on this figure. It's too late in the day for me to research a new one at the moment though. --Folantin (talk) 20:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Akbar Shah I

message: This article seems to be confusing Akbar Shah II with Akbar the great.
*Akbar Shah II was an emperor who ruled in the final decades of the Mughal Empire (see List of Mughal emperors.)
*Akbar Shah I (or King Akbar I) would have been Akbar the Great.
Redirecting article.
Pahari Sahib 15:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Akbar the Great]] and [[Akbar Shah II]]
Talk:Pick–Sloan Missouri Basin Program

message: There should be a mini-article on each project within the Plan, with a link to the full article.
I have a better understanding of the Oahe project and can start that.
Cadillac Desert will probably help this page out and expand its information.
Ab2kgj (talk) 18:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate sections 

message: In the Sloan plan I would maybe try to find more information and details, especially because you said his plan was more intricate.  Also, I feel like with encyclopedias people may start reading at a certain heading, so maybe treat "The Sloan Plan" as its own entry instead of comparing it so much to Pick's plan.  For example, if someone only wanted to know about Sloan's plan they would start there and when you say "One year later" the reader wouldn't know what that means.
Under "The Omaha Conference" I would reword the sentence "The compromise allowed the Corps of Engineers to retain control over flood control and navigation projects and five main-stem dams" it is kind of confusing to read and uses control two times close together and a lot of "and"s.
Very nice article!! The only other thing I can think of is maybe another image to add to your article possibly!
Mcissne2 (talk) 06:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Bahlul Khan Lodi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Vermillion River (South Dakota)

message: LOVE THIS FOR LOOKING THINGS UP IM THE RIVER--76.170.189.61 (talk) 01:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Bibi Rajindar Kaur

message: A portrait would improve the article. Asarelah (talk) 17:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait Requested 

message: Reference source cannot be accessed. Maybe we can use this source instead:
https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Bibi_Deep_Kaur  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NinjaOng (talk • contribs) 04:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source not found
Talk:Bassem Feghali

message: KEEP - Bassem Feghali in Lebanon has the legendary status of Bob Hope in the U.S.  He is funny as hell and comes from the CORE of Lebanese comedy while introducing to Lebanon female impersonaltion something that the Lebanese would have never embraced if it wasn't for the exceptional talent of Feghali.  Lebanon is a very small country with very limited resources for internet exposure so you will not find a zillion articles on the net or many hits on google for MANY famous Lebanese.  This is why we need to include famous Lebanese celebreties without discrimination.  No one in the US would ever dispute the status of Bob Hope in he US or Louis de Funes in France. No one would EVER dispute the status of Bassem Feghali in Lebanon and in many parts of the Arab world.  Unless you are Lebanese or an Arab, you most likely have never heard of Bassem Feghali... just as much as an Arab (not Arab American) most likey has never heard of Bob Hope.
Lcnj 18:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm confused by your addition of star imitator to this article.  That isn't really a category of people; you can see that we don't have an article on that subjects.  Drag queens are men who imitate women as a public performance; I don't see any reason to replace that very clear phrase with a phrase that doesn't link anywhere. What is it about this man that makes him not a drag queen?  The contents of the article indicate that he's a man who does impersonations of women in performance. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Drag queen?
Talk:Chach of Aror

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: Hi, Subject name should be renamed as Aror is precise name instead of Alor., So I suggest move this article to Chach of Aror. Jogi 007 (talk) 08:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject name should be renamed as Aror is precise name instead of Alor 

message: According to following document Chach of Alor was son of Mathura's Dewan Rai Narsingh Dev. Document only lists one brother - Nahar Singh. There is no information on Chandar. Can someone please correct which ever page has wrong information.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chhibber  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torment.crux (talk • contribs) 17:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chach of Alor's Brother - Chandar 
Talk:Right fielder

message: I felt offended by the article. I played right field in little league and I still play it in High School. So please change it to be less offensive. Thank you.
Thekostiknator 18:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a source for the claim that RF has a reputation for being a position to "hide" weaker players. SchnitteUK (talk) 15:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Booooo!!!!!!!!!!
Talk:Chowta (surname)

message: We have a problem: the article is clearly slanted towards the Bunt community and the list of notables therefore infers that those named are Bunts. That amounts to original research: while it may be the case that Chowta is a common Bunt name, it does not exclude the possibility that the name may be used by non-Bunts. Is there any way to resolve this? - Sitush (talk) 15:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slanted towards Bunts
Talk:Dantidurga

message: Add 2402:8100:2255:5124:EBFD:3C9E:DEE6:FCAB (talk) 09:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math
Talk:Daulat Rao Sindhia

message: Please move this page to Daulat Rao Sindhia. You can also name it Daulat Rao Scindhia but you cannot drop the "Rao" because that was part of his name and he is known in ALL history books with the "Rao" included. That was the custom of his people, the Marathas. NOWEHERE except in this Wikipedia is he mentioned simply as "Daulat Scindhia." I suspect that dropping the "Rao" is intended to make his name correct in the Western style, like "John Smith" or "George Baker" but that is not a correct thing to do.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.168.140 (talk) 13:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please move this page
Talk:Data drilling

message: modification on 21062011: please note that drilldown is a noun, to drill down is a verb. There is no hyphenation in English unless the context would make understanding difficult, e.g. drill-down report is a composite of the phrasal verb plus the noun in contrast to drill down report, which would be an instruction to drill down in the report.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.160.157 (talk) 09:12, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  selective hierarchy article
Talk:Firuz Shah Suri

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: This page should not be speedy deleted because the other site has almost certainly copied Wikipedia, not vice versa. --Folantin (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on what? Two things: User:Siddiqui is serial copyright violator and the only reason I found this page is because I was working on his contributor copyright investigation here. Secondly, that website has a copyright notice 2003-2005 at the bottom, which would be unusual if it did not exist until 2006. If you have any evidence which indicates this is reverse copyvio please present it, but looking at what we have now this should be deleted. Yoenit (talk) 19:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, on second thoughts you may have a point... I'm here because I reacted to your edit summary to Ismail Shah Suri. I remember rewriting almost all of that article from a book, so I imagined I was being accused of copyvio. On the other hand, it does look highly plausible that Siddiqui lifted material from that site, so I'll withdraw my objection  - although I think rewriting the article from scratch would be better than outright deletion. Cheers. --Folantin (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:4 Nations Cup

message: Sweden is #9 in the IIHF ranking. Can it be called a 'major'?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1370:812D:2F81:64A2:3E4C:5E90:75D3 (talk) 17:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "held between four major national teams in the sport"
Talk:Gwalior State

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: An IP editor keeps removing this image claiming the article is not about the Raj. As the image is in a section about a ruler of the state who made a treaty with the British, the image does not seem out of place to me.  Just restating the article is not about the Raj is no reason to censor any image including the British. noq (talk) 11:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Mahadji Sindhia entertaining two [[British East India Company|British]] officers with a nautch]] 

message: There are no Maharajas in independent India. Therefore those claiming the title post independence are pretenders. Please update this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.21.64.140 (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Maharajas after 1947?
Talk:Hoshang Shah

message: Can someone please throw some light on the war in which he loses his wife? talk  —Preceding comment was added at 17:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  War in which he loses his wife 

message: This article clearly has NPOV issues.  It's basically a shrine to this guy... did he ever make mistakes or...?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.250.176.187 (talk) 00:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV issue
Talk:Hyderabad House

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 04:00, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Delhi By Patrick Horton, Richard Plunkett, Hugh Finlay--Omer123hussain (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books 
Talk:Ibrahim Khan Lodi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Lodhi and Lodi are two different last names. Can someone please verify this (Preferably with a source because I think that there are better ones out there than the ones that I've got right now) and help me change the name of this page? Thank you. JoycesUllysses (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation. 

message: His Name Is Ibrahim Khan Lodi Not Ibrahim Lodhi. Sultan Zaryab Khan Lodi (talk) 13:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IBRAHIM LODI 

message: I would request wiki contributors to correct the spelling of this page to "Ibrahim Lodi" rather than "Ibrahim lodhi" because both are different. People are getting confused between these two. 2409:4081:D01:9C28:F10D:5CF0:37FE:3F6C (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lodi not Lodhi
Talk:Ibrahim Shah Suri

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition