Talk:Vieques, Puerto Rico

message: The POV of the History section is questionable, as tenuous facts and assertions abound in what seems an attempt to vilify the U.S. Navy's presence on the island.  Better, more-neutral sources (as opposed to an anti-Navy site and a socialist worker's website would help. - Mustang dvs 02:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Neutral? That report seems to ignore the main problem caused by the US Navy's exercises, Vieques' ridiculous cancer rate. - Caribbean~H.Q. 07:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: The history section needs sub-categories, improved accuracy and less editorializing, as noted by other users below. - Mustang dvs 02:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I question the 33% have had cancer statistic. Why, that's one out of three! Here's an anti-Navy site: 
:"the School of Medicine at the University of Puerto Rico announced in 1997 that the cancer rate on Vieques was twenty-seven percent higher than on Puerto Rico." 
Twenty-seven percent higher would mean, for example, an increase from 100 cases per million to 127 cases per million. It would not mean in increase from 6% to 33%!! --Uncle Ed
Here's another site:
:"The data shows that the island of 9,300 people has an average of 30 to 40 cases of cancer a year."
That percentage is approximately 0.5% -- a far cry from 33%. Do the math, people... --Uncle Ed
You must have misread the article the person did not say 33% he said 31% higher than the rest of the Island, he did add that the socialist web site had 33%, but then mentioned the statistical number of  31%. Or maybe it was corrected.--zetback 10:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have the url for that statistic? — Mustang dvs 02:23, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Primarily, under the content titled "Administration", the words "here" and "county" assumes that everyone who consults Wikipedia is from The United States and nowhere else. This does not represent a worldview of the subject; therefore a note of such has been added along this discussion entry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Flurry (talk • contribs) 15:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldwide view 

message: I thought Vieques / Bieke came from a native word meaning "crab", hence the British naming it Crab Island?  The article header currently states that the name came from a native word meaning "small island", which I've never heard before despite being there several times and talking to the historical folks both at El Fortín and over in Esperanza...  -- Erik Anderson, 17:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: Congressional Research Service Report RL32533 
The Congressional Research Service (CRS), known as "Congress's think tank", is the public policy research arm of the United States Congress. As a legislative branch agency within the Library of Congress, CRS works exclusively and directly for Members of Congress, their Committees and staff on a confidential, nonpartisan basis.http://www.loc.gov/crsinfo/ Congressional Research Service Employment Home Page
Reports by the Congressional Research Service, usually referred to as CRS Reports, are the encyclopedic, public domain research reports written to clearly define issues in a legislative context. Over 700 new CRS reports are produced each year; almost 4,000 are currently in existence.
CRS reports are highly regarded as in-depth, accurate, objective and timely, and topped the list of "10 Most-Wanted Government Documents" in a 1996 survey by the Center for Democracy and Technology.http://www.cdt.org/righttoknow/10mostwanted/ 10 Most Wanted Government ocuments
As you can see on the following CRS Report for Congress on the Report RL32533 of July 7, 2005, title "Vieques and Culebra Islands: An Analysis of Environmental Cleanup Issues " examines the implications of the site listing for environmental cleanup
You can find this Report on the following WikiLeaks Document Release Web Address http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS:_Vieques_and_Culebra_Islands:_An_Analysis_of_Environmental_Cleanup_Issues%2C_July_7%2C_2005 of 
February 2, 2009.
On the Abstract of the report indicate the following:
This report provides information on the listing of Vieques on the NPL, examines the implications of the site listing for environmental cleanup, indicates the status and estimated costs of cleaning up munitions and other environmental contamination on Vieques, and discusses cleanup actions and costs at nearby Culebra Island. 
Summary
For decades, the U.S. Navy conducted ship-to-shore bombing exercises and
other live-fire training activities on Vieques Island and Culebra Island, located off the
coast of Puerto Rico. In response to concerns about risks to public safety, human
health, and the environment, Congress directed the Navy to close its training facilities
on Vieques Island in 2003 and to relocate them elsewhere. The Navy has begun to
investigate the presence of munitions and related contamination on Vieques to
determine the cleanup actions that will be necessary to protect human health and the
environment, and has begun the surface removal of munitions in some areas. In
1974, Congress had enacted legislation that required the Navy to cease its training
operations on Culebra Island, in response to similar public concerns. The Army
Corps of Engineers has removed some munitions on Culebra to address safety
hazards in publicly accessible areas, but has not begun a comprehensive cleanup of
the island. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Puerto Rico
Environmental Quality Board are responsible for overseeing these actions.
There has been rising public interest in the degree to which the Department of
Defense (DOD) will be required to clean up both islands. The scope of the cleanup
will depend on the type and extent of contamination found, and whether a pathway
of human exposure exists. The National Defense Authorization Act for FY2002
(P.L. 107-107) prohibits public access within the Live Impact Area of the former
bombing range on Vieques. Public access also may be limited in other areas due to
the presence of munitions hazards. Since denying public access is intended to reduce
safety threats, DOD may be allowed to remove fewer munitions than would be
required otherwise. However, if contamination has leached from munitions and
migrated to present a pathway of exposure, removal of more munitions may be
required to protect human health. Possible pathways include the consumption of
contaminated groundwater and contaminated fish or shellfish.
At the request of the Governor of Puerto Rico, Sila M. Calderon, EPA listed
Vieques on the National Priorities List (NPL) of the nation’s most hazardous waste
sites on February 11, 2005. Listing a site on the NPL does not affect the stringency
of the cleanup that is required or increase the availability of funding for the Navy to
perform the cleanup. Rather, it identifies Vieques as a site that warrants further
investigation to determine actions that are necessary to protect human health and the
environment. The Governor also requested that EPA list Culebra on the NPL along
with Vieques. However, EPA “elected to take no action” on its final listing decision
for Culebra at that time, and reports that the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the
Army are negotiating a Memorandum of Agreement to govern the cleanup.
Regardless of the site listing decision, the degree of cleanup on either island will
depend on threats to human health and the environment and the types of remediation
that will be deemed necessary to address these threats. Whatever actions are
required, the progress of cleanup will depend on the availability of federal funding
to pay for the remediation. This report will be updated annually to track the status
of cleanup on both islands.
The information provided in this report was originally prepared at the
request of Representative Jose Serrano. It has been released in this format
for general distribution to interested Members and Committees of Congress
and their staff.
--Seablade (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congressional Research Service Report RL32533  

message: Lord of the Flies (1963)at approximately 1:30:30 into the 92 minute movie identifies Puerto Rico as its exclusive setting and names Vieques specifically.... a visual comparison confirms (to me) that majority of the Island shots were from Vieques.
being that the book was considered great literature (at the time at least) and the movie appears to ape the book quite accurately it occurs to me that some mention of the island being used as a movie location might be in order --Qazwiz (talk) 03:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used in movies 

message: Merged 1 paragraph content from Milivi Adams to here per consensus to merge the content into the article Vieques#Public health from 2014 (which I wasnt involved in).
I found it had not been done so I simply assited in the merger. --Wuerzele (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor merger with Milivi Adams

message: The article currently reads: "In 1941 ... the United States Navy purchased or seized about two thirds of Vieques as an extension to the Roosevelt Roads Naval Station nearby on the Puerto Rican mainland."
This is misleading; the article on the Naval Station makes it clear that the Station was intended BUT DIDN'T EXIST until 1943. This totally changes the meaning of the Navy's "purchase or seizure" (a question which needs resolving) to being part of a process. Twang (talk) 03:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naval Station didn't exist in 1941 

message: The areas are listed in square meters, which makes no sense. I'm not sure how to change this so can somebody please fix this? Commander0034 (talk) 16:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart of Barrios