lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hamadryad

message: Have removed this information from article Hamadryads - and redirected here - use this is info if valauble:
Hamadryads are spirts of trees like their cousins the Dryads,but the difference is that Dryads resemble humans with tree like features and characteristics and can leave their trees. Hamadryads,on the other hand, use their trees as their bodies and thus look like trees with human features that can walk and talk.
Cheers--Lethaniol 14:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Interpol notice

message: Possible sources:
* http://www.interpol.int/Public/ICPO/FactSheets/GI02.pdf
* http://www.interpol.int/public/Notices/default.asp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SQB (talk • contribs) 08:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: For example, a notice will not be published if it violates Article 3 of the Constitution, which forbids the Organization from undertaking any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial character."[1]
Does it mean "published" or "issued" ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyac (talk • contribs) 08:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: The article needs serious updates. 
See e.g.
The number of Red Notices issued each year has increased from 1,418 in 2001 to 13,048 in 2017. This rise has been largely attributed to the introduction of a new web-based communication system, which has streamlined the process of filing Red Notices. 
https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/03/the-scourge-of-the-red-notice-interpol-uae-russia-china/
The diffusion notes are the easiest to abuse seemingly.  Zezen (talk) 08:10, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The data differs a bit from what I saw in the interpol annual report PDFs. Could someone take a look at those and add in the other notice data? I couldn't find it in the official reports. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 01:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update re abuse 

message: Please see :fr:Interpol#Chiffres_cl%C3%A9s, nearly all recent years data is there. Yug (talk) 23:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The data differs a bit from what I saw in the interpol annual report PDFs. Could someone take a look at those and add in the other notice data? I couldn't find it in the official reports. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 01:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data
Talk:Right atrium

message: Both pages are short with some duplication. Think they would be better presented on one page. Iztwoz (talk) 20:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Right atrial appendage]] 

message: Propose merge to Atrium along with proposed merge of left atrium. Both are subtopics of Atrium and would be better presented as a whole. Also similar to Ventricle page. Iztwoz (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:William Perl

message: Does anyone know dates on this?--Twintone 14:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth/Death 

message: A Rosenberg Conspirator Reveals More About His Role (The New York Times) 
Morton Sobell, who was convicted with Julius and Ethel Rosenberg in 1951 in an espionage conspiracy case and finally admitted nearly six decades later that he had been a Soviet spy, now says he helped copy hundreds of pages of secret Air Force documents stolen from a Columbia University professor's safe in 1948. According to an article by two cold war historians, Ronald Radosh and Steven T. Usdin, in The Weekly Standard, Mr. Sobell, who is 93, said in an interview last December that he, Julius Rosenberg, William Perl and an unidentified fourth man spent a weekend, probably Independence Day, frantically copying the classified documents in a Greenwich Village apartment before they were missed.Freundinlah (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sobell and Perl 

message: The article now lists all 14 Venona references to Gnome/Perl.  This seems unnecessary, since Haynes and Klehr are the source of the references and their note is already cited in the article. Rgr09 (talk) 13:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venona references
Talk:Joel Barr

message: there was no reference!
I have a quote but im not providing reference, google it 
"Knowing what I do now, it was a tremendous mistake to have done what I did, he said.
that is NOT a denial! Juror1 (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  his denials 
Talk:Metronatural

message: Metronatual is a slogan derived from Metrosexual. I'm adding this BACK TO THE ARTICLE. DO NOT REMOVE IT.--Ragemanchoo 15:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it. It is a baseless claim if it does not come with a reliable-source reference. Please see WP:OR about additions which have no reference, and which are termed "original research". Skybunny 22:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I've removed it, too. It was re-added by the same user, without any reference as to the source of the claim. --Waif2k (talk) 17:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And removed yet again. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Good removals. I do not believe that the term was derived from Metrosexual, but when the slogan was revealed, there was a public outcry about it and the similarity to Metrosexual (http://www.seattlepi.com/local/289518_metronatural21.html). Eauhomme (talk) 15:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slogan origins 

message: I reverted the minor numbering changes on the press release quote to match exactly the text in the source press release. It may seem minor, but if it is a quote directly from the original text, then the quote should be exact (to avoid editorializing). If Exclaim wishes to modify their original press release, then the quote and its reference can be changed accordingly.
--Waif2k 14:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Press Release Quote 

message: "created for Chris"? Whiskey tango foxtrot is "Chris"? That really ought to be explained (or omitted).2fs (talk) 05:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who?
Talk:Greg Costikyan

message: Did Greg Costikyan write his own wikipedia article?  if so, doesn't that make it original research?  JudgeX (talk) 04:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He has only made one edit, this, which is just to create one link. The article was written by other people. Ryan Paddy (talk) 21:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI 

message: You mean Manifesto Games? Its Wikipedia article is up for deletion, so there's all the more reason to mention it here.66.71.90.75 (talk) 18:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "a viable channel for indie games" 

message: Replying to the edit summary: "(a) I don't see any questionable links (b) I see lots of citations. If someone sees something bothering them -- LEAVE A COMMENT, DON'T SLAP TEMPLATES WILLY NILLY!)" 
a) I just cut down the external links according to WP:EXT. b) Yes there are many citations. Most are either from the author or broken links. There are no 3rd party refs for who he is, how old, and other core parts of a bio article. Please do not remove the refimprove tag again without improving this. c) deadlinks need attention d) please create an account and use that to discuss Widefox (talk) 12:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography and refs 

message: Just thought that I'd stir this rather humdrum bio talk page by mentioning Costikyan's "famous" article in which he "proves" the voracious energy usage in the Traveller rpg - math which was later proven both superficial and inaccurate, though by then the meme had already entered the culture, and which (of course) Costikyan never corrected himself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.184.114 (talk) 21:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:Ernst Hirsch Ballin

message: i heard he's ballin —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.252.22.161 (talk) 00:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BALLIN 

message: Please be aware, in the Dutch version of this article it was suspected that someone was trying to cleanse his resume. And considering the whole 1994 situating lacking here, and the Nekschot case being stated in extremely vague terms, we should watch out on this page as well. PizzaMan (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing
Talk:Ryde Pier Head railway station

message: Despite the usage, over 300,000 people used the station as an interchange. Can this be explained? Simply south 14:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Where did you get that number from? It's not that I think it's wrong, but can we cite it?  The station's ticket sales will be out of kilter because the 100,000-odd figure is only for tickets starting or ending at Pier Head.  The fact that through tickets to (for the sake of argument) Fratton don't get counted is neither here nor there - they still had to get off the train here as it doesn't go any further!  --Peeky44 (talk) 01:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: MMM, from a ticketing point of view the ferry service can be considered part of the rail system (that is you can buy tickets from island line stations to/from mainland stations). It would be interesting to know how many tickets are sold between island line stations and mainland stations. i'm sure that data must be in some DB somewhere but I doubt it's published. Plugwash (talk) 09:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, the office of rail regulation statistics does in fact have an interchanges column, more research needed here I think.... Plugwash (talk) 09:31, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Libya

message: Hi, I've been having a discussion with another editor on the Libu article over whether the Libu people should be considered a civilization. Since I'm not a regular contributor to Libyan articles, I would like some input from those more familiar with the topic. The talk page discussion is at Talk:Libu#Short_description. Thanks! Liu1126 (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Input needed on [[Libu]] article 

message: Hello WikiProject Libya: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 13:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon 

message: Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries. 
Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and proceed to further rounds. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
Libya is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest, so articles related to it are eligible to be submitted for points. I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content! 
Append your name to the DCWC signup page today! 
Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 10:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:DCWC|Developing Countries WikiContest]]
Talk:Lebanon and Tremont Branch

message: The Lebanon & Tremont Branch also has an intact station on N. 8th St. in the city of Lebanon.  It appears to date to the 1880s. Bill S. (talk) 15:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irving not only intact station 
Talk:Thomas Coke (bishop)

message: Hello friends,Just a question after reading this article while working on the French Methodist missions. It's not clear to me from reading the text why the page should be entitled "Thomas Coke(bishop)". It looks as if he tried his best to become the first Methodist bishop but didn't succeed. If that is so, then an apter title could be "Thomas Coke(Methodist)"; if not, an improvement of the Coke's biography could clarifiy the when and how of his nomination as a bishop.Pensées de Pascal (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishop or not bishop 
Talk:Sally Barker

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 14:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The material on this page has been personally verified for its accuracy by Sally Barker.  Tvccs 14:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy Verified 

message: I have tried to find reliable sources to be used in this article but failed, other than the minor mention in Billboard. It has had a BLP sources tag on it since January 2011. Recently contentious unsourced claims have been added to the article. So it's both (largely) unsourced and problematic. I suspect that the subject may be sufficiently notable to satisfy WP:NMUSIC, but it's time that it was properly sourced. I would favour redirecting to The Poozies (for which sources do exist despite its present state) over deletion. Any thoughts? --Michig (talk) 16:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been lacking sources for long enough. Since the only source found simply confirms her membership of The Poozies, I'm redirecting there. --Michig (talk) 10:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect? 

message: Confusion is getting a grip here. The article at this point did contain some unsourced material that I wouldn't expect to see here, and the revision history shows that the bio was added over a series of edits by editor sajparker. Then editor michig deleted the whole article. I thought that was going too far and brought it back in a much simpler form ... but now it seems sajparker wants to remove even this reduced version.
As others have said, you can't put the genie back in the bottle. However as the article was in any case under threat of deletion due to lack of notability and sourcing, perhaps it should be let go, and become a redirect to The Poozies as michig intended ? Monxton (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Next? 
Talk:Jonathan Cushaine

message: I placed the notability tag in this article for two reasons. One is a google search turns up little, and the other is that it seems unlikely that the article can be expanded -- this seems to be a minor character who is no longer on the show.
Does this character really need an article that is unlikely to become more than a stub? Could this article become part of a general article on minor characters in this show? Kathy A. 15:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pakistani history

message: Hi, I'm newly appointed coordinator of the Wikipedia: WikiProject History. I was coordinator of the Wikipedia: WikiProject Military History before.
My scope is to improve the cooperation among the different history projects andf use the synergy of a common infrastructure to improve article quality. One idea would be to merge small project into a larger wikiproject history with a common infrastructure and the small projects continuing independently as task forces of this project. What are your suggestions? Greetings Wandalstouring 15:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  collaboration of the history projects 

message: You are invited to join the discussion about whether individual rulers of Turk Shahis and Nezak Huns deserve individual pages. Relevant links are:
:*Discussion on Ghar Ilchi
:*Discussion on Bo Fuzhun
:*Discussion on Tegin Shah
:*Discussion on Barha Tegin
Thanks, TrangaBellam (talk) 13:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A relevant meta-discussion is in progress at this thread. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Requests 

message: Started a disscussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Pakistani history (1947–present) please contribute.- Anjana Larka 07:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Pakistani history (1947–present)]] 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments
Talk:Düsseldorf school

message: Düsseldorf School is another article in Wikipedia. It is a poorer link in Wikipedia, ergo, I have chosen to place statements here, at Düsseldorf school.  Statements contained here in this article (Düsseldorf school) have been extracted or copied from New International Encyclopedia, which was published in the United States when a hot, feverish interest  in art was sweeping across that nation. GhostofSuperslum 15:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two articles on it exist, now

message: Kunstakademie Düsseldorf is a third article, ergo, confusion may be encountered.  16:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to New International Encyclopedia, Schadow left the school in 1830 and Lessing replaced him as director.  That statement conflicts with the list of directors in the article Kunstakademie Düsseldorf.  GhostofSuperslum 02:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to information in New International Encyclopedia, Schadow traveled to Italy in 1830 and again in 1840.  He became more religious after the second visit.  After he returned to Düsseldorf, he painted religious paintings with themes related to religion.  Apparently, he was the director during three periods.  A.  Replacement of Cornelius (1820s).  B. Replacement of Lessing (who had replaced him) in the 1830s. C. Replacement of (someone) in the 1840s.  GhostofSuperslum 02:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Three articles exist, truly

message: Note: Please discuss the merge here: Talk:Kunstakademie Düsseldorf#Merge Sebastian scha. (talk) 21:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion
Talk:Heather Wendorf

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 14:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I found what appears to be biased opinion at the end of this article.
The statements
"The state of Florida erred in not charging her. She claimed to be a victim but did not know that her parents were not killed. Someone had to give the "killer" the address."
after the external links section seems like more opinion than factual information.  I would have edited it but it fell below the editable text for some reason.  I'm newish to Wikipedia, so I thought this might be a good place to post. 70.55.98.229 00:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased opinion 

message: revised article - heather wendorf did not live in kentucky and the movie "twisted desire" was not about heather... see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twisted_desire —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.155.212.206 (talk • contribs) 
You truly know knothing about it all do you?She was freinds with Rod Ferrell,so he knew wheer she lived.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.191.14.220 (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  revision 
Talk:Moog Inc.

message: Moog FCS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Moog Inc and its activities are closely linked with those of the parent. The additional information on the subsidiary would not require the article on the parent to be of undue length, and people looking for Moog FCS or its predecessor FCS Control Systems will be able to locate them equally well with redirects. Bongomatic 07:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of [[Moog FCS]] and [[FCS Control Systems]]

message: MOOG recently purchased AMPAC-ISP (Formally ARC-ISH and before that Bell Aerospace in Niagara Falls, NY).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.221.166 (talk) 15:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMPAC-ISP 

message: I took a shot at reducing the advertising speak that has been on this page for eight years (see above in the COI discussion). There are real questions about whether this company is notable enough for the amount of information it had and has on the page. There are almost no references supporting the many claims made. This is because, while it is no doubt a major producer of technology  for military and other applications, very few people write about the company. I have to conclude that the article is a major piece of advertising for the company itself. I'd propose that the product description sections be either improved or reduced to whatever can be supported by references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.58.148.127 (talk) 06:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up
Talk:Sarah Slean EP

message: I'm not too sure if this is an EP. If you follow the All Music link you'll see that they categorize it as a major album. Ozzykhan 15:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  EP? 
Talk:Road switcher locomotive

message: I don't think the term "road switcher" is used in Czech and China - by 73.231.98.122, 17 May 2019
:Well, neither country has English as a first language, so the term is probably something different in their languages. Even between Britain and the US (2 countries separated by a common language) the term is different. But the concept still exists. If you know the terms used in Czech and China then feel free to add them.  Stepho  talk  00:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czech and China 

message: Why the use of past tense in the "Transmission" section? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇  03:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see any good reason why. Please feel free to change it.  Stepho  talk  11:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense?