Talk:World Heritage Sites by country

message: What does State Party mean in this context? --84.20.17.84 08:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing. Doesn't anyone know? E.G. 09:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Presumably, the States which have signed the UNESCO Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Aridd 14:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  But surely that would be 'States Party', rather than 'State Parties'? Should this not be called 'Table of World Heritage Sites by State'? Pterre (talk) 17:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Party 

message: ¡Actualicen el mapa y la lista! Actualize (I'm not sure if it's called like that) the map and the list!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.179.30.188 (talk) 06:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  We are in 2008! 

message: I find the colours a bit harsh. Calmer colours would be nice (see GDP maps), both for the maps and the barchart. The colour coding of the bars could serve as an indication of geographic zones, since the lenght already indicates nr. of WHS. Elekhh (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the color scale used in the maps does not make any sense - it should at the very least be monotonic! --CAFxX (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Something like this ? And SVG format. --Elekhh (talk) 04:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colours 

message: the Middle East is listed as "grey", but "grey" is written in pink. Puchiwonga (talk) 08:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect

message: The chart thing is fuskered up when number for Russia is tinkered with. How to fix  ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.22.28 (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, 23 and 25 are values accepted, but for some reason there is a problem with the 24, the real value of current Russian Sites. While DerechoReguerraz momentaneously leaves it on 23, we should find someone who knows well the program behind the chart, EasyTimeline, version 1.13. Torne (talk) 06:31, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  chart prob 

message: Just to note, since the reorganization of the regional WHS lists, things like List of World Heritage Sites in Europe#Belgium don't work anymore as there are no such subsections in the Europe lists anymore. Eventually this will be fixed by creating List of World Heritage Sites in Belgium (and similar for other countries). Until then, List of World Heritage Sites in Belgium (etc) should probably be made into a redirect to List of World Heritage Sites in Western Europe, and any link with "#" (which is an ugly way to do things anyway) should be replaced with the redirect page. (similarly for other countries) bamse (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects to sections 

message: The title of this article refers to "Table of World Heritage Sites by country", however this isn't what the data is in the table. The data in the table is of "World Heritage Listings". A World Heritage Listing can contain one or more sites. Thus the title of this article and the heading above the table needs to be changed or the data needs to be changed and new article made for "Table of World Heritage Listings by country" Whats up skip (talk) 09:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I donot agree "List of World Heritage Sites by country". There are over 1000 Heritage Sites in the world, but this article is not such a huge list. I prefer "Table of World Heritage Sites by country" or "List of countries by World Heritage Sites". But the latter is somehow weird.--Haojian (talk) 10:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Title or Content 

message: I think that it would be very useful to link to the national lists (e.g. List of World Heritage Sites in Albania) directly from the table, either through a new column or by replacing the existing links to the country pages.  What is the community view please? Simongraham (talk) 13:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Country Lists 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of World Heritage Sites by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060207191942/http://law-ref.org/HERITAGE/index.html to http://law-ref.org/HERITAGE/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There are 10 sites in South Africa now and it should be added to the list Ebsilva151 (talk) 03:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Africa 

message: Change the number of Bulgarian World Heritage Sites from 9 to 10. Change the number of Bulgarian Natural World Heritage Sites from 2 to 3.
 
The number of Bulgarian World Heritage Sites is incorrect. It should be 10, because the number of Natural World Heritage Sites is 3 and not 2. Bulgaria shares "Ancient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe". Add [note 1]. 2001:A61:474:9700:3029:5004:85B5:F7CB (talk) 07:17, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Danski454 (talk) 10:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 July 2018 

message: Change total sites for Bulgaria from 9 to 10
The total number of Unesco World Heritage Sites is incorrect. Currently it is 9. It should be 10 (=3+7). 2001:A61:474:9700:9944:972B:9B23:AC68 (talk) 14:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Danski454 (talk) 14:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 July 2018 

message: Include Angola and Eritrea 195.243.200.180 (talk) 07:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Danski454 (talk) 09:55, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2018