Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Devon

message: Would someone please take a look at Mole Valley Farmers which currently has a tag about notability. I think that with the latest content I have added,  it is notable enough to be kept but I am not impartial as I have been editing it and I am regular customer. Thanks.--NHSavage (talk) 20:05, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As no one has commented, I will in a week or so be bold and remove the notability tag myself (okay waiting a month is not really bold but nevermind).--NHSavage (talk) 17:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mole Valley Farmers 

message: In the hope that a Devon-based editor might see this, I wonder if anyone has/could obtain a photograph of this, Golden Bed, which I believe is on display at Knightshayes. A photograph of the matching wardrobe would be an even greater boon. Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 12:53, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Knightshayes Court]]

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: Hi folks, I work for Wikimedia UK and I thought you might be interested in something we're doing with the University of Exeter. Working with Dr Liz Shaw, a Research Fellow, we're holding a seminar and workshop for researchers based at the university. She came to us with the idea and it's encouraging to see the university being pro-active about giving their researchers the skills to communicate research. It's a one-off event at the moment, but these things can get people thinking about how to work with Wikipedia so watch this space. If you want to stay in touch with what we do, and get some ideas for how to get involved, you can subscribe to our quarterly newsletter. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimedia UK and the University of Exeter 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Hello! I have recently created a bot to remove completed infobox requests and am sending this message to WikiProject Devon since the project currently has a backlogged infobox request category. Details about the task can be found at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PearBOT 2, but in short it removes all infobox requests from articles with an infobox, once a week. To sign up, reply with  and tell me if any special considerations are required for the Wikiproject. For example: if only a specific infobox should be detected, such as  for WikiProject Academic Journals; or if an irregularly named infobox such as  should be detected. Feel free to ask if you have any questions!
Sent on behalf of Trialpears (talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New bot to remove completed infobox requests 

message: Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, we have over 44,000 stubs! A good opportunity to improve stubs for your area!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:08, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon

message: Some Devonian expert could have a look at Rock Park. I de-vandalized it, but the page needs some local love. 
JennyCrash (talk) 17:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock Park 

message: :Category:Devon articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 17:53, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Devon articles needing expert attention]] has been nominated for discussion

message: I have started a project for missing civil parishes at User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes. The missing parishes in Devon are:
* Lands common to Axminster and Kilmington
* Whitchurch, Devon (parish)
And these exists as a redirect only but should have separate articles:
* Ogwell
* Powderham
A total of 4, see User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes (1)#Devon. Crouch, Swale (talk)  17:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging 1st half of members to get more input . Crouch, Swale (talk)  19:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging 2nd half . Crouch, Swale (talk)  16:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parishes project 

message: While doing random reading (I was looking for someone who died in 1549 to make a joke), I came upon the page for John Hull II which claims he was born in 1503, died in 1549, and was a "friend and supporter of Oliver Cromwell," but that's impossible as Oliver Cromwell (to whom it links) wasn't born for another 50 years, 1599. The reference cited for that mentions a "Cromwell" but not which. I'm going to remove the claim of a connection, but if anyone's interested in sussing out which Cromwell it was referring to that would be nice to restore with correct information. It may perhaps refer instead to Thomas Cromwell. 174.29.107.44 (talk) 01:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Hull II's connection to Cromwell 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Hi folks, last month the Royal Albert Memorial Museum approached Wikimedia UK for help sharing images. We have a stream of work called 'Connected Heritage' where we help cultural heritage professionals improve their digital skills, and share content in the process. Yesterday, RAMM and WMUK worked together to share a few dozen public domain images from their collection. They are mostly of Exeter, with a couple from further afield. You can see the 67 on Commons and I've put a sample gallery below. I reckon some of the images may be useful for articles. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images from the Royal Albert Memorial Museum 

message: I've just updated the page with the election results. The 'politics' infographic needs the coloured dots rearranging and I cannot see how to do that. There's also an out of date map that needs attention. Thanks. Thelisteninghand (talk) 13:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[South Hams]] 

message: Hello! Wikimedia UK and the Royal Albert Memorial Museum are organising an editathon, 'Devon in Red'. The theme of the day is Devon history, and all are welcome. If there are groups you think would be interested, or friends or family who might be curious, please do share the event with them!
There will be training, and experienced editors can crack on with editing from the off. As a bonus, we'll be joined by the authors of Devon Women In Public and Professional Life 1900-1950: Votes, Voices and Vocations. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 08:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  21 September editathon in Exeter 

message: A discussion is ongoing at Template talk:Infobox English county#Proposal: remove the ethnicity section which is likely of interest to this project. The original proposal is for straight removal of the ethnicity field from the template but keeping the population field.  A modification to the proposal includes this also but seeks the addition of two optional, undefined statistical fields within the non-metropolitan and unitary authority sections of the county infoboxes — at present there are no demographic statistical fields, other than population under these headings. Rupples (talk) 23:55, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed county infobox template change 

message: Lundy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Lundy]] 

message: Bertram Fletcher Robinson - Following much recent expansion, and promotion to GA status, please could I request a reassessment on the Importance Scale within this WikiProject category? Many thanks. 82.38.214.91 (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not how importance works. Importance does not change depending on article quality; it remains constant whether the article is a stub or an FA. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bertram Fletcher Robinson 

message: South West Coast Path has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[South West Coast Path]]