Talk:Yaşar Büyükanıt

message: I am sorry that I had to insert a POV-tag. I belive the article can become NPOV through reformaulations. We cannot have a biography of a controversial person to look as a fan site. For instance it says now "he has come to be known as a successful commander, easily mixing with the population and with a keen eye for the region's problems". And the article about the controversy about his involvment in the Semdinli affair is basically an attempt to defense his actions with value ladden formulations. Bertilvidet 14:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag

message: I hope the beloved general of the nation, Yaşar Büyükanıt Pasha, can lead Turkey to a powerful position in the world arena. With respect, Deliogul 23:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: aha Bertilvidet 23:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: what is so funny?? Pls dont have this orientalist view.. Baristarim 00:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing is funny, the aha is an ascertainment as I don't think this page is appropriate for discussing personal views of the general. Retrospectively I must admit that the comment indeed is open to many interpretations ;-) Bertilvidet 08:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expecting a Successful Era 

message: People, please refrain from adding every speech that he has done and every reply that he has received... Because in that case that list can go forever, to the recent addition of Olli Rehn's comments I can also add his response etc.. I am already not too happy with the fact that we have included a crackpot islamist conspiracy theory in the article, but this is getting too much. Instead of just listing every single newspaper article on him, try to phrase them in a short concise paragraph by synthesing them.. It has really become a news blog on Yasar Buyukanit :))).. Baristarim 07:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is right. However the speech and its reactions might deserve a little sentence - lets fix that in some days when there not continously will come more material that can be added. Bertilvidet 09:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely disagree with Baristarim. The so-called e-coup d'état, and its possible ramifications now that Abdullah Gül has assumed the presidency, is probably the number one reason why people would come visiting Büyükanıt's page in the first place. The Turkish military is partly a political institution, as well as a security force. It seems positively obscurantist to omit all references to Büyükanıt's political stances... 85.99.106.127 10:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Let's not make this a newspaper

message: At the moment it is a copy of his bio on the TSK webpage. We should rephrase things, and add more sources. DenizTC 03:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As luck would have it, I'd been preparing a facelift for the 'political controversy' section deleted last year. I've now expanded and rehabilitated this section a bit. The dönme allegations issue is of no interest to me, but I suppose some readers might care about it one way or the other. I agree with Deniz, the biography section must be rewritten to avoid plagiarism and use the TSK site as one source among others. Q·L·1968 ☿ 13:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. E104421 14:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: E104421, I don't get the point with your edit summary. Please be more clear, about your edit, and mention which parts of the previous version failed WP:BLP. Thanks. Are you claiming that the Middle East Research Unit is non-reliable? DenizTC 02:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree. We're now back to a plagiarized biography and a censored politics section. This solves nothing. Think of it this way, why would most users want to read an article on General Büyükanıt? Could it be because he's at the centre of ongoing controversy concerning the future of Turkey ... or do they merely want to find out about his medals? Q·L·1968 ☿ 08:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you both missed the discussion "Let's not make this a newspaper" above. Wikipedia is not a place for speculative original research. Middle East Research Unit is a project to translate the newspapers from the Middle East region. On the other hand, newspapers are not generally considered as reliable sources. Of course, there are world-wide recognized ones but it's always better to rely upon academical or encyclopedic sources. The article should be rewritten if there is a copy-vio or plagiarizm but removing the content in favor of the speculative one as User:QuartierLatin1968 calls it "what most users want to read" would make it even worse. This is a biographical article not the one discussing the Politics of Turkey. As already mentioned in the warning tag at the top of the discussion page: "This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous", i'm in favor of keeping the current content but with better wording and sources. Regards. E104421 09:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly Hürriyet and Cumhuriyet (also Akşam) are reliable. If you want to, we can find the original versions to check whether they are any different than the originals in Turkish. I don't see the point with deleting them. 20:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

text: No, I didn't miss the discussion, but I disagree with it. Wikipedia should describe controversies, with proper attribution – not cover them up. General Büyükanıt is probably the third or fourth most important political figure in Turkey today. This is why he's worth writing about – not because he graduated from the Turkish Military Academy or has an Italian medal. Don't be offended if I ask you a direct question, E104421: have you looked at his TSK biography? Word for word, paragraph for paragraph, it's the same. Now, I don't know what the TSK's copyright policy is; perhaps materials produced by the Turkish state is in public domain, just as in the US. But unless we know that that's true, I have half a mind to slap a  template on this article, if the biography keeps reproducing the TSK version longhand. All the best, Q·L·1968 ☿ 08:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh, TSK biography is exactly the same, but I guess it's in public domain, so there won't be any copy-vio. The Turkish version of it appeared in the news before. Anyways, the bio should be rewritten if there is a copyright issue. The Wikipedia:Guidelines for controversial articles do not include biographies of living persons. For this reason, it's better to mention the controversies in the Politics of Turkey article. Actually, it's already mentioned but briefly in the article. Regards. E104421 12:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to risk (guess?), just rephrase, and try to find other sources. We should not fall victim to WP:Recentism either (think about how a wiki reader not just now but also in the future would expect to see), but some mention is necessary imo. I think the wiki readers even now would probably come here for his position rather than the controversies, until a new controversy is created (by Büyükanıt or by local/foreign media). DenizTC 20:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewrite

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Yaşar Büyükanıt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071230071535/http://www.aksam.com.tr:80/haberpop.asp?a=54547,4 to http://www.aksam.com.tr/haberpop.asp?a=54547,4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Yaşar Büyükanıt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tsk.mil.tr/eng/genel_konular/chief.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110103055336/http://www.todayszaman.com/news-202443-former-military-chief-on-the-defensive-over-e-memo-criticism.html to http://www.todayszaman.com/news-202443-former-military-chief-on-the-defensive-over-e-memo-criticism.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified