lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Akane-chan Overdrive

message: deletion: why was this article deleted?--Secretwanderer 23:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: I don't know why TheFarix redirected this without discussion or explanation, I have undone it. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 23:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's not notable. If you can find two or more reviews of other the work or other significant coverage, then you can restore the article with the reviews. Otherwise, leave it as a redirect. --Farix (Talk) 23:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Then put it up for AfD and go through the normal Wikilike procedure. Obviously, there is resistance to your doing this-do it properly (you know how) or I will get an admin. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sending the article to AFD when the result is so obvious is just mindless wikilawyering. And you still haven't give a reason why the article should continue to exist. The burden of evidence over the inclusion of information is on those who submits it or wishes to keep it. --Farix (Talk) 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unexplained, undiscussed redirect
Talk:The Woman on Pier 13

message: I Married a Communist was only the film's title during two preview runs in 1949 in two cities. It was already changed to The Woman on Pier 13 for the regular 1950 release. (See e. g. Jarletts biography on Robert Ryan.) So the latter should be more appropriate for this article. – Robert Kerber (talk) 07:49, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The "Communist" title was scrapped after polling those preview audiences.  It is listed in the Academy and AFI databases as The Woman from Pier 13.  I will move the title, and fix the redirect.  And make a notation in the article regarding the name.  It's also known by it's working title, Beautiful but Dangerous. Onel5969 (talk) 15:25, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title change suggested
Talk:Gladeview, Florida

message: I am so pleased with this article--85.166.50.252 00:00, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Satified
Talk:Blender (device)

message: Hmmm... Benderrr!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ReluctantPhilosopher (talk • contribs) 12:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I think this page should be moved to Blender and the disambig page currently there should be moved to Blender (disambiguation) as most people who search for blender will be looking for this. Yonatan talk 16:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:History of Chinese currency

message: For some reason the term Chinese yuan redirects to Renminbi, should we include information about the 1912 to 1949 Yuan here or make it a separate article? --Donald Trung (talk)  15:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROC Yuan 

message: Banknotes were issued in yuan denominations from the 2019 by several local and private banks
This has got to be a mistake. But I have no idea what it's supposed to be so I'm just leaving a comment here. --Zuoanqh (talk) 03:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 Qing Dynasty Yuan? 
Talk:Parkway School District

message: Are the schools supposed to be in order? Ardric47 00:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section is too specialized and not relevant to this article.--greek lamb 07:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, in the mean time I have cut the unsourced material in this section. Jon 17:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet Censorship 

message: Doesn't this qualify as a stub?
70.246.157.101 (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub
Talk:Peter Gregg (racing driver)

message: Most of the article as it stands now is a very minor modification of this text at the Motor Sports Hall of Fame. This is plagarism and a violation of their copyright. Because of that, I am reducing this article to a (very) small stub. Feel free and re-add information, but don't dump minor modifications of text from elsewhere into Wikipedia. —Bunchofgrapes  (talk) 00:27, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Kad network

message: The Clients sections says only four clients support Kad, but then lists five.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.215.216.23 (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  four clients or five? 

message: The Kad network seems pretty application agnostic. Why is BitTorrent not using the Kad network but its own (modified) Kademlia implementation (Mainline DHT) instead? What are the main differences between those two? --Tddt (talk) 02:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences to BitTorrent DHT? 

message: The article should mention when started operating, seems like 2004 saw the first eMule with working access to the network. 155.210.238.19 (talk) 08:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction date
Talk:Petty apartheid

message: What about "grand apartheid"?Phase1 00:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

message: As the template I added earlier "Copy to Wikitionary" indicated, I favored moved this article to Wikitionary.  That has been done.  --Deodar 20:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikitionary entry made
Talk:Atlanta International Pop Festival (1969)

message: I removed the notability and refimprove tags added by  based on the current state of the article - as far as notability I don't think this is an issue if there are sources about it 44 years later, and the amount and quality of the current references seem appropriate to me. Good job  on improving this. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance tags 
Talk:Utah Blaze

message: My vote: No  Different owners.  Different leagues.  Different histories.  I would recommend moving Utah Thunder to Utah Blaze (AF1).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CKStark (talk • contribs) 03:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestions Utah Blaze/Utah Thunder 

message: Why was the sections removed with the history of the Utah Thunder before they became the Utah Blaze?  I wanted to know what the logic was before reverting it back to include the history of the franchise.  Thanks CKStark (talk) 02:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Utah Thunder history?
Talk:Dracaena sanderiana

message: Why exactly are we changing the water? Oxygen? Is it possible to just add an airstone and air pump to the water with some liquid plant food?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.247.28.234 (talk) 07:44, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydroponics? Why change the water? 

message: :That has nothing to do with Bamboo. Its only a common name for the plant "Lucky Bamboo". The Taxobox Picture is not D. sanderiana but the other species with same common name: Dracaena fragrans 'Stedneri'.
   i believe you were talking about the last picture, which i have since removed due to it being Dracaena fragrans (Just some student on the web (talk) 19:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not bamboo 

message: I have read most of the articles written for new wiki members but i have one question thats troubling me. When I first found this page I noticed that its not complete, but thats not my point, its our responsibility to make it complete. But I want to know how can I do it, I can do following things:
1) point to some resource(read external links) which covers lot of things on this topic. But thats not possible because most members think its spam linking.
2) I can copy that site and paste here, OR copy and write here in my own words. In both case I should give the credits(resouce links) to the original article/site. I am sure you won't suggest me to copy it shamelessly without giving credits, would you?
3) forget about writing/ ask for more options.
So after getting a message from one of the members I have stopped 1 and was thinking of doing 2 but felt like asking you all(3).
Expecting a fast reply of course not as fast as the removal of links that takes place here (read every 5 minutes).
Jacksmith123 16:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a fast reply because I wrote it as soon as I read the above.  Click on the "Help" link (probably on the left side of the page) to find an introduction to editing on Wikipedia.  Generally, you should write in your own words but use information from an existing source, giving that source credit. See WP:CITE.  (SEWilco 04:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  how can i contribute? 

message: Isn't the informal name "lucky bamboo" incorrect as this plant doesn't belong to the group of bamboos? --Abdull 10:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is incorrect.  The incorrectidnessly should be explained in the article.  (SEWilco 04:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading name
Talk:Nazism in relation to other concepts/Archive 2

message: I had intended to now source all you required . I delivered the above because 1936 is like,un-obtainable. I strongly suggest you obtain a copy of Mowrer's Germany Puts The Clock Back which is the fruit of this Pulitzer prize-winners stay in Germany from 1918 to 1933, c March the 1st . Hitler obliged Mowrer's departure by threatening the whole body of foreign correspondents in some way. Mowrer acceded, and was probably aware he could be murdered, though that thought occurs to me just now. Listen , I'm sorry that you don't appear to answer the questions I return, whilst I tried to answer your points as assidously as I could both here and there. That said, I have an arbcom case against me for propounding just the catholic part of the intrigue, and in my view, objecting to  catholic denialism on WP . As you see this is but a factor in the history , whereas here it sucks up all my time, all my credulity and so on. Obviously you made no personal attack. Anyway  I do assure you that I have sourced everything elsewhere, and been wiped only to a certain extent. The Pope Pius  XII pages do now exhibit some relationship to politics in Weimar, and vice versa. I spoke to you at the length I did so you could carry on the good work . 
Now-Tumbleif I put that in it's Mowrer, but surely not. I hate to think I could use such an inappropriate word either . One that I have seen in relation to political cover-up and appeasement, and which I loathe, is soothe and soothing. I just class that as so tasteless that it isn't "en." use. On a par with charismatic on Hitler.  Well, Jmabel, I hope you will understand  better for having seen the source  above. You will find nowhere the succinct manner in which I portrayed the final acts, but in your library you will easily find many of those writers I high-light, and of course each will pay re-reading as the actual events are so very multi-influenced , that no single straight chronological explanation can be written by them . Only an actual timeline, ie megamemex, which solely attributes date-stamp gives succinctness. Shirer for example finds so much to clarify that you could read right through the chapter and come out confused as to what happened. Indeed actual confusion still remains in the books as  here on Wikipedia . Shirer's lack of clarity in this is why I repaired ,for user:Wyss ,the Weimar Republic article or Weimar Germany or both, and of course, why I provided you with my succinct squaring in the article here. I should come back and source soon , but I am rather thinking about the definition of vatican agent right now, and heading back into the legalities . Keep killing tumble and target the soothing prose .You see how clear and un-soothing  Arthur Rosenberg is, so you can imagine how fast he had to run from the Fuhrer. Check out Edgar Ansel Mowrer for the future concepts as lived around the time. I'd better head for the scandal and finish with it .It'll take a while .Thanks  ,
EffK 23:06, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Tumble and Soothe
Talk:Demon Sorcerers

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move as a matter of policy. —Nightstallion (?) 08:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I was directed to this article by the one on Jackie Chan Adventures and when I saw nothing about the Demon Sorcerers being fictional, I started to think they were actually part of Chinese Mythology simply picked up by the show.  But the mention of Shendu and Drago implies that they were made up specifically for JCA.  I'm going to be bold and add that they are fictional characters from Jackie Chan Adventures; if this is incorrect and they are actually part of Chinese Mythology, somebody please undo my changes.  Thanks.  24.35.48.242 (talk) 06:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional? 

message: The birth order of all the demons was never stated in the series. Nor was the Netherworld ever referred to "Hell," and thus the demons were never referred to as the "Hell Sorcerors." Was this exclusive to the comic? The reason I'm asking is that the birth order is often debated in the fandom, and I've only seen the Netherworld referred to that way in fanfiction.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zinoviya (talk • contribs) 06:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy
Talk:Figuig

message: Figug is Algerian sovegrien territory. BlueWizArdi99 (talk) 14:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of Figug 

message: Figuig is an oasis town within Algeria. As established by the 1972 line of demarcation. The entire region of El Arja and the countryside within it is within Algeria. Algerian soldiers have recently entered the border and clarified the territorial boundary between their country and morroco. This territorial boundary will come into full effect of Algerian sovereignty as of the 18th of March 2021. BlueWizArdi99 (talk) 14:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The current border dispute does not concern Figuig proper, which is uncontroversially part of Morocco, but rather the nearby palm groves of El Arja, owned by people from Figuig but apparently located on the Algerian side of the border (see e.g. https://www.tsa-algerie.com/algerie-maroc-tensions-dans-la-zone-del-figuig/ https://www.yabiladi.com/articles/details/107175/figuig-terres-d-el-arja-proprietes.html). If you have evidence that Algeria claims sovereignty over Figuig itself, please post reliable sources. Even if it did (which it never has AFAIK), that would not be sufficient to justify unilaterally editing the article to present such a claim as undisputed fact. - Lameen Souag (talk) 15:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

text: I am in complete accord with [User:Lameen Souag] on this. The territory at issue is the palm groves of El Arja and not the entire city of Figuig which is unequivocally under the sovereignty of the kingdom of Morocco; according to the sources listed below, the city of Figuig spans approximately 20 000 hectares, whereas the palm groves of El Arja is only 114 hectares. It is henceforth entirely unreasonable to claim or imlpy otherwise. Sources: (https://announce.today/home/announce/fYVY1BcUEMTaVJnzB6mJ https://www.en24news.com/now/2021/03/tensions-at-the-border-between-morocco-and-algeria-after-the-expulsion-of-farmers.html)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pietromassiccio (talk • contribs) 20:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of Figug 

message: Let's stop edit warring and have decisive conversation about the status of Figug.
If anyone is willing to have a reasonable conversation about the events that have occurred in the past 48 hours that put Figug's historic status under question let's talk.
Thank you guys I am new here so if you see me making any mistakes please guide me and help me refrain from them in future 
Right now I'm goi BlueWizArdi99 (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Figuig is a Moroccan town. however, it lost lots of it's territory to Algeria since 1973, namely the eastern valley, Lmelias, parts of al Arja (not all of it), limited access to Zousfana valley. the Moroccan military also narrowed the civilian accessible territory, I am no longer able to visit some parts of the town I could visit just three years ago, I can attach a map if necessary. Riadmarzouki (talk) 00:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The status of Figug
Talk:Sauromalus ater

message: There has been some recent academic debate over name precidence (Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 61:74-75).  After the dust settles, we may need to move this content to Sauromalus ater and redirect from here to there, as the S. ater version seems to have precidence, albiet not a popular one.  Rklawton 01:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rename article to Western Chuckwalla instead? -Ravedave 18:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chuck Crate

message: -- Just curious how this person (assuming they are actually real as there is no references) makes it onto the list of Canadian Fascists? The article claims he was a member of the CCF which is a left leaning political group. Fascists are traditionally right leaning. 
Does he belong on this list? (Again, assuming he is real).  Drake76 (talk) 21:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:AD 2048

message: ==Israel==
Before jredmond makes his ritual deletion, I'd like to argue for its inclusion.  On the Talk Page for 2045, he stated that "General consensus so far is that these anniversaries are more clutter than content. The only possible exception is if something encyclopedic happens during an observation of the anniversary."  I understand this argument for something like the 100th anniversary of the Titanic sinking.  It's not going to sink again in 2012, but if the centennial of the founding of the modern state of Israel doesn't garner any mention in historical records, including Wikipedia, if it still exists, I would be very surprised.  In fact, unless, President Ahmadinejad has his way, and the nation is "wiped off the map" before then, this day will undoubtedly be violent, and at the very least see massive demonstrations.  
I won't kid myself in believing it's not going to be deleted anyways, but at least I've had my say here. --Palpatine 01:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

message: See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipses 
Talk:Michel Majerus

message: Reads like an artists way to look on an artist
:Hopefully the copyediting has fixed this problem. The "Painting Style" section still reads a little like a blurb from an art magazine but there's not much that can be done about this. The section is necessary to explain the nature of Majerus' work, especially in the absence of images. Euryalus 07:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft/Election Discussion

message: We'll have to make sure everything works. Get POTD in order (it already updates but still requires the tedious making of subpages). Have DYN remove the title and then we can template it in. Also, DYN should change back from "Today's second feature" because we now have both of those feature's running all the time.--HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 22:54, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Before the new Main Page is put in place...

message: Let's imagine that the draft wins.  What can we expect to happen after the draft is placed on the Main Page, and how should we deal with it?  --Go for it!
:I expect a lot of complaints. Not because it will be worse than the original, but because people who approve rarely comment, while people who disapprove always comment. Loudly. - Trevor MacInnis (Talk | Contribs) 00:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If we can petition a Bureaucrat (or whomever it is) to have a message similar to ArbCom on the watchlists, I think we'll get enough publicity to not suprise anyone.--HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 12:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I could edit it directly but there have been complaints of so called "spam" being placed there. For now I've placed a query about it and if noone respnd I'll put it on tonight. -Trevor MacInnis (Talk | Contribs) 16:20, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean for the watchlists? Where do you put queries like that?--HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 16:42, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: MediaWiki talk:Watchdetails  —David Levy 17:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.--HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 17:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: After the new Main Page is put in place...

message: Solipsist seems to be single-handedly running the Pic of the day department.  This means we need to work with him to determine how the new Main Page will be supported.  And since the Main Page alternates also rely on the pic of the day, we might as well cover those at the same time.So I've sent a message to Solipsist to open discussions about the future of Pic of the day department and how to best support the pic's various applications.In order that the discussion does not take place in a vacuum, I'm letting everybody know so that you can monitor and/or join in.  Perhaps you will think of something that escapes us.--Go for it! 06:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sent a query to [[User:Solipsist|Solipsist]] re: Pic of the day
Talk:Boris Karlov

message: I've just created this article by pumping the text of the Dutch version through Babelfish and correcting the obvious infelicities.  It's barely possible that I have introduced lies inadvertently, so extra eyes are really needed.  I've never worked across languages before on Wikipedia: how do the different versions stay in sync?  Do I have to do anything to establish links to the Dutch and Bulgarian versions?  ACW 01:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft/Portal poll

message: One important discussion, relating to the main page redesign is what browse/portal topics to include on the main page?  I have gone through the above discussions and counted the number of times support/opposition was expressed for a particular topic.  I encourage more discussion here, pros/cons of the portal topics, and I will keep updating the table below. --Aude (talk | contribs) 01:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now, I think we have ten solid topics: Art, Culture, Geography, History, Mathematics, People, Philosophy, Science, Society, and Technology.  Depending on how the browse topics are presented in the header, we can accommodate 12 (in Draft A, B, C, D), or up to 15 with the icons (Draft I, J, K), and with plain link in Draft G, H, I'm not sure what the maximum would be. --Aude (talk | contribs) 02:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

text: All.  They are the speediest way for users (not editors) to find what they are looking for.  Thus, the more the merrier.  Also, there should be a link to a list of country portals.  --GeLuxe 02:43, 29 January 2006 (UTC)