lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Linda Zagzebski

message: The article has been expapnded with concerns to two primary sources:
* an academic paper published in 1994 which is one of the most original theoretical results of the subject matter. She demonstrates that any extension of the JTB can't avoid the Gettier problems or paradoxa: even if we add a fourth condition or change the last one of the Knowledge as justified true belief (JTB), then we can't have a reliable criterium to define what is knowledge and what is not;
* a book published in 1996 where she gave a new definition of knowledge and an Aristotelian-like definition of  virtue.
There were also cited some secondary sources in which it is highlighted that for the first time in the history of modern gnoseology knowledge depends from the subject not solely in terms of a passive and static belief, but also in active and free acceptation to his call to realize his and his neighbour's happiness, while realizing the human essence and his singular one. Thus, virtue is dispisotion of the free will and ability of the person.
The role of objective truth isn't denied, while it is put into brackets in the uncertainty of his metaphysical origin and in spite of the preminence of the epistemic subject. So far, she affirms knowledge is "a state of belief arising out of acts of intellettual virtue", without the word "truth" being pronounced (p. 171). But here it becomes preminent the subjective aspect of the true belief, which realizes human creatures in their natural tendence to the knowledge of truth. Nevertheless, this implies that what is believed is also objectively true. 
To be eventually integrated in the WP article, knowledge implies to develop particular skills and to evaluate the personal belief-forming processes. Moral virtues also include originality, creativity and inventiveness. Those virtues weren't cited in the article because "if only 5 percent of a creative's thinker original ideas turn out to be true, her creativity is certainly truth conducive because the stock of knowledge of the human race has increaed thorugh her creativity" (source: p. 96).Theologian81sp (talk) 20:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epistemology 

message: How is her surname pronounced? 86.32.55.188 (talk) 03:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Mike Medavoy

message: IP address have been adding unreferenced and promotional-sounding information to the article, in effect trying to make it a puff piece. If there is to be an article, it should be built on references that are reliable sources and maintain a neutral point of view. Erik (talk | contribs) 12:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Isn't that nice. 2A02:AA1:1626:E371:4DC6:DF8E:2A75:CBF8 (talk) 19:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When their son, Nick (who is 6'8") was born, Mike Medavoy sang 'Singing In the Rain' to him.[17]
Talk:Moritz Schreber

message: The references are still in German, and I promise I will take care of that. But for now, they make for an acceptable substitute, in my opinion. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, um, maybe I should live up to that promise sometime soon... |dorf|trottel| |mess|age| 14:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: May never do it now. 78.34.132.253 (talk) 12:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: German references
Talk:Muriel Dowding, Baroness Dowding

message: We have this to support Dowding's vegetarianism. Yet all it says is: There were regular Sunday lunch parties introducing influential people to vegetarian food. With pride she would display what she called a 'vegetarian larder' to guests.
It doesn't actually say she was vegetarian, just that she had a "vegetarian larder". Is this a good enough reference for the claim? --91.135.14.165 (talk) 16:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was enough referenced as it wasn't a controversial data, however I have added another reference. Akhran (talk) 01:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Th sourced part of the reference seems to talk about vivisecion rather than vegetarianism; however, you're right that it isn't a terribly controversial claim. I'd still like to see a (good) source for the claim. --91.135.14.165 (talk) 22:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegetarian?
Talk:Naomi Mitchison

message: Can someone who knows please add the detail to this article. Lumos3 13:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the statue located? 
Talk:Stella Isaacs, Marchioness of Reading

message: Given that her husband was Jewish, might it make sense to put something about Lady Reading's religious background here? Was her family Jewish (the names of her parents don't really suggest it, but who knows?)? Did she convert to marry Lord Reading? Was it a mixed marriage? john k (talk) 14:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judaism?
Talk:Susan Buchan

message: Given the lifelong continuing residence in Canada of two of their four children and her own vast service to the country, did she make return visits after departing on the GG's death in 1940? And if so, could they be mentioned? For that matter, is it not possible to mention the four by name and birth-dates, specifying which two of them remained in Canada? Surely no violation of privacy given their birth considerably before 1935. Masalai (talk) 05:56, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean it is an unofficial title? Because it has certainly been used. Robina Fox (talk) 17:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Time in Canada

message: I found a copyright-expired image of Susan Buchan here: https://www.wikitree.com/photo/jpg/Grosvenor-235  but I cannot work out how to add it to Wikimedia Commons so that it can be used in this article. If you can, please do!  --  04:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Mike Nesbitt

message: This image has been authorised by Mike Nesbitt for free use and by Mike Nesbitt's management and uploaded by Austenlennon 13:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How come he is listed as having four children, and yet his wife only two? Safebreaker (talk) 05:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Children
Talk:Evert Willem Beth

message: The definition theorem needs spelling out; either that, or furnish a link to a 'Definition theorem' article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.131.17.53 (talk) 16:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition theorem 

message: How is his 1970 book published, if he dies in 1966? Llamabr (talk) 15:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, that's confusing. The first edition was in 1962. RockMagnetist (talk) 15:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Mike Pilavachi

message: This is a very poor article and needs serious cleanup. It's badly written, un-informative and has too few sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.39.13.186 (talk) 18:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, why not lend a hand and help improve it? — Matt Crypto 20:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor  

message: As he was ordained Deacon in 2012, he must have been priested by now, check for date.  Also, a year needs putting to the addition of a fifth week to Soul Survivor as the latest year mentioned in the section is 2011.Cloptonson (talk) 11:50, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Having read the article on Soul Survivor I have been able to date the development to last year.Cloptonson (talk) 05:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates Needed
Talk:Matthew Titone

message: I realise that this page has previously been deleted but, given that he's just been elected to the state legislature, I've re-created it on the basis that he's now achieved sufficient notability. --Lincolnite 22:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mike Rabelo

message: We should put a new one up because this one clearly doesn't make him stand out.-DANO- (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be great if we could actually get an image we could use. But you keep replacing what we have with a non-free image, so we have to keep reverting it. --Rabbethan 00:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Nick Garratt

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Franco Burgersdijk

message: — Assignment last updated by Patt0400 (talk) 18:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Science to Newton
Talk:Mike Scaccia

message: I have removed material from  that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott MacDonald (talk) 20:00, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Mike Shrimpton

message: Despite the lack of secondary sources presented in the article, this individual is deemed notable in the WP:BIO sense, as he complies with the criteria set out in WP:NCRICKET. Thanks to User:StAnselm for supplying an intelligent edit summary which enabled me to verify that. Canepa (talk) 10:11, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability confirmation 
Talk:Mike Siani (American football)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 03:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mike Siani →  – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per page views  Joeykai (talk) 21:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 June 2023
Talk:Mike Small (footballer)

message: Hy Mike, 
I'm trying a long time to contact with you, send your e-mail.
Fernando's e-mail, preesporte@itelefonica.com.br
bye —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.171.163.146 (talk) 13:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are you Mike? 
Talk:1M1 Records

message: Hello to the editors of ,
As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed an rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: The article lacks a certain fluidity in several parts and provides no inline or supportive references.'
However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I only post my answer underneath your question. 
ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 02:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed
Talk:Mike Smith (American football coach)

message: That was a different guy: Mike Smith (Dave Clark Five). Yngvadottir (talk) 05:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. --Malerooster (talk) 05:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dave Clark Five]] 

message: Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#"winningest" in sports articles. Until consensus is reached, articles should be reverted to the previous stable version, per the policy WP:NOCONSENSUS: "In discussions of proposals to add, modify or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit." —Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:55, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Winningest in sports articles under discussion
Talk:Mike Smith (football manager)

message: According to Ian Garland, co-author of the Wales International Who's Who, Mike Smith was born in Hendon in the July-Sep quarter of 1934, but the exact date 'it's a mystery'.
Cris Freddi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.3.81 (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article's only source (at time of writing) says that Mike Smith is Welsh - BBC News - though could believe that this is lazy journalism. Grunners (talk) 09:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality
Talk:Peacock Theatre

message: The Stoll Theatre is covered in this article, and was a former theatre on this site. Only point in splitting would be if both had substantial articles. Currently, this is 'start' and that is 'stub'.
Proposal is:
#Redirect London Opera House here, with applicable cats there
#Redirect Stoll theatre here, with applicable cats there
#Develop this article with the former theatres in mind.
HT is agreeable. Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 16:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: done Kbthompson (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: What building was that? I remember reading about it a few years ago. It was either in Paris or in London. I don't know if its still standing. When it was being renovated in the mid-1800s a body was discovered inside one of the walls. At that time it was already at least 200 years old. --24.21.148.155 (talk) 02:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Body found in opera house wall??
Talk:David Zalcberg

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 02:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lor Tok

message: Lor Tok was described as short and dark skinned, with black hair and often sported a pencil moustache. Nonetheless his good humor won him an admirer in Somjit, a statuesque actress, model and beauty contest winner. 
Emphasis added. The implications about short, dark-skinned, black-haired, and the mustachioed are less than flattering, to put it mildly.
:In Thai culture, those attributes aren't considered physically attractive (except for the moustache, which is a touch of distinction). Unfortunately, this bias is inherent in the source for the article and I regrettably allowed that bias to creep into the article. The nonetheless has been removed. — WiseKwai 23:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yikes
Talk:Love Police Records

message: It looks like the label relaunched last year, though all the news articles treated it as though it was a new label: https://rhythms.com.au/love-police-starts-record-label/ 
The labels website says they've been around since 1997, but doesn't have a bio with any further information.
It also looks like Love Police ATM is part of the Mushroom Group: https://mushroomgroup.com/company/love-police-atm/ and was formed when Australian Tour Merchandising merged with the record label in 2011: https://www.lovepoliceatm.com.au/about-us
Looking through the web archive it looks like Love Police focused on touring until recently: https://web.archive.org/web/sitemap/http://lovepolice.com.au/ They also published a book https://web.archive.org/web/20130726022428/http://lovepolice.com.au/books/ 
--Jimmyjrg (talk) 07:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates Needed
Talk:George Canning, 1st Baron Garvagh

message: Does anyone know WHY George Canning was elected a fellow of the Royal Society in 1810?   I actually wrote to the Royal Society a few years ago to ask them, but they don't know (either).   The London based Royal Society was and is generally associated with scientific achievements and discoveries, but of course in 1810 the country had been at war with France for nearly twenty years, so decision processes in national institutions of this kind may, like so much else, have been on a "war footing" at the time.   In other words, Canning's contribution to the greater good may have been associated more with political or diplomatic achievement than with some otherwise (at least to me) unevidenced starring role in the world of science.
Any and all further information on the whys of "Irish" George Canning's fellowship of the RS would be gratefully noted.   And almost certainly deserves to be included in this entry.   Thank you (if you did) for reading this and for sharing your insights on the matter.   Charles01 (talk) 14:58, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Royal Society
Talk:Mike Wilson (executive)

message: He's now doing Gambitious, this should be updated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.128.115 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gambitious! 

message: This article sounds like a CV. Ashmoo (talk) 11:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if Wilson himself has written most of this. --82.181.62.153 (talk) 03:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone

message: As a subject deep in my areas of study, I can immediately sense that this article has been worked over by professional PR. There is a significant amount of flowery, promotional language used to describe relatively mundane achievements, with a complete neglect given toward related known negative consequences that followed. Some examples:
The release of Quake as shareware was, according to Masters of Doom, a disaster on multiple levels. First, the shareware model was widely considered dead by this point. Second, the encryption used on the disk was cracked shortly after launch, resulting in a huge loss of money. Finally, the entire gambit was concocted as a somewhat juvenile way to "stick it" to Ron Chaimowitz at GT Interactive.
Referring to ION Storm, which is a well known disaster requiring no explanation here.
Again according to Masters of Doom, Wilson left DWANGO because the writing was on the wall that it was about to fail, as it could not support the internet-based netplay of games like the upcoming Quake. It cratered less than a year after he left.
The article additionally goes in-depth on the subject's advocacy activities, while neglecting any mention of choices which were heavily criticized or controversial, such as hiring of "booth babes" for the Gathering of Developers tent at E3 or participation of GWAR at Microsoft's Judgment Day event in October 1995.
I do not know what formal processes exist on Wikipedia for review of this kind of interference in content. Maybe it can be addressed without such a process if someone has time to de-bias this material. 
--QuasarTE (talk) 23:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Significant PR influence/bias on this article
Talk:Ivy League Records

message: I have inserted a Clarify message in the Lead section, as it is unclear whether all three members were from The John Reed Club.--Soulparadox (talk) 13:28, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding members query 
Talk:Mike Zimmer

message: He is the 9th head coach of the Vikings, not the 10th.
70.40.46.78 (talk) 02:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2014 

message: Can you just do us all a favor and resign 147.202.162.66 (talk) 17:34, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coaching 

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but we do not publish hirings of coaches that are not yet official. He is only expected to be hired. Coolsharkymd (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cowboys
Talk:Shock Records

message: I have created a References section, but this article has no citations whatsoever.--Soulparadox (talk) 12:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline citations 

message: It's this company still active? None of the links or references work. ShadowXVII (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non existent?
Talk:Chapter Music

message: Would someone please start a Wikipedia entry for the band Beaches (Australian band)? Their 2008 self-titled album was listed in the 2010 book 100 Best Australian Albums. There is a US band called “The Beaches”. Design (talk) 00:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beaches deserve own Wikipedia article
Talk:L. T. F. Gamut

message: Since they only published one book (true in 2 vols and translated) under this collective name, perhaps renaming it to the title of the book (in English) would be a good idea.
Also, there's a review of the series at . Tijfo098 (talk) 00:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: The linked review tells me that T. stands for 'Taal', and that 'Taal' means language. But virtually all other sources say that Taal means Afrikaans. Gamut doesn't write about Afrikaans, does he? What does Taal really mean? --84.177.27.198 (talk) 15:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taal?
Talk:MGM Distribution

message: Sufficient references can be provided (and will be provided) to eastablish notability Dan arndt (talk) 04:24, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should not be speedy deleted because...  
Talk:Poolstock

message: Poolstock is south of the River Douglas, starting where Chapel Lane crosses the river and changes to 'Poolstock'. The road is then known as Poolstock until it crosses a brook, a quarter of a mile further south. The road then changes to 'Poolstock Lane'. Poolstock is bounded by the River Douglas from where the brook joins it. Wigan Pier is a distance north of the river and is not in poolstock. 80.193.161.89 23:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)