lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Media Mouse

message: The October 6, 2007 edit contained information that could not be verified, specifically regarding the attributing authorship of the site to Jeff Smith and Media Mouse's relationship to the Grand Rapids Community Media Center. I was able to find no indication that Jeff Smith is Media Mouse's "principal author and editor," nor could anything be found showing that Media Mouse was "informally affiliated" with the Grand Rapids Community Media Center. I found that the Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy (GRIID) was a part of the Media Center, but no similar information could be found about Media Mouse. Consequently, I removed that section because it was uncited. It can certainly be resubmitted if citations are included.
Finally, I looked up information on the IP address attributed to the edit and it resolves to an address with Gemini Publications, a media outlet in Grand Rapids:
reparation:
The  reverse DNS entry for an IP is found by reversing the IP, adding it to "in-addr.arpa", and looking up the PTR record.
So, the reverse DNS entry for 63.168.29.210 is found by looking up the PTR record for
 210.29.168.63.in-addr.arpa.
All DNS requests start by asking the root servers, and they let us know what to do next.
See How Reverse DNS Lookups Work for more information.
How I am searching:
Asking e.root-servers.net for 210.29.168.63.in-addr.arpa PTR record:  
       e.root-servers.net says to go to basil.arin.net. (zone: 63.in-addr.arpa.)
Asking basil.arin.net. for 210.29.168.63.in-addr.arpa PTR record:  
       basil.arin.net [192.55.83.32] says to go to NS3-AUTH.SPRINTLINK.NET. (zone: 168.63.in-addr.arpa.)
Asking NS3-AUTH.SPRINTLINK.NET. for 210.29.168.63.in-addr.arpa PTR record:  
       ns3-auth.sprintlink.net [144.228.255.10] says to go to ns1.wmis.net. (zone: 29.168.63.in-addr.arpa.)
Asking ns1.wmis.net. for 210.29.168.63.in-addr.arpa PTR record:  Reports out.geminipub.com. [from 216.109.194.1]
Answer:
63.168.29.210 PTR record: out.geminipub.com. [TTL 43200s] [A=63.168.29.210]
It's kind of interesting that another media outlet would appear to be making a change to Media Mouse's entry.
Garlicskid 19:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 6, 2007 Edit
Talk:Paul Kazarian

message: Came to check up on the Neutrality tag. I don't see any specific issues, so I will edit the article to try to make it more objective and then go from there. --Brewspoker (talk) 20:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Please remove the delete tag.  This article is not about me! When I googled this article, my name came up and I do not want my original username to come up at all.  I would like the exact title of the article to be picked up by google.
Also, the subject of the article is very notable.  He has established three foundations, one foundation that promotes Armenian awareness and issues.  This is significant in light of the recent debate on the Armenian Genocide Resolution.  Also, this successful person was written about in a book titled, The Vulture Investors, by Hilary Rosen.   
I will also add references to this article.  Please remove the delete tag.  Thank you.  Dengnoi 19:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Ivan

message: I see nothing wrong with this, in fact, this can almost head for FAC as it is. CrazyC83 23:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Passed

message: I appreciate that the date of appreance as Featured Article would have been determined a while a go but it seems a little inappropriate to have this as a features article while Hurricane Harvey is causing such devastation.
Graemec2 (talk) 09:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think it would make it more relevant. Brutannica (talk) 15:09, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate Timing

message: *Duplicate link
*Images need alt text
*References need first and last name. Many are just last name, however, the first names are available on the NHC's site.
*A plethora of meteorological coverage from academics that needs to be included here.
Listing at WP:FARGIVEN per the above. NoahTalk 15:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: CCI check not done. NoahTalk 15:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]]
Talk:The Thugs

message: The page is filled with an extremely large number of cite errors, which is sufficient to make the content essentially unreadable. The specific error message is: Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer, use a descriptive title. I don't really have the time to "be bold" about it at present. How should we go about fixing this? 131.215.159.196 (talk) 11:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite errors
Talk:Dynamic Duo (professional wrestling)

message: The page is filled with an extremely large number of cite errors, which is sufficient to make the content essentially unreadable. The specific error message is: Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer, use a descriptive title. The cause does not appear to be vandalism. How should we go about fixing this? 131.215.159.196 (talk) 11:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite errors
Talk:Batgirl: Year One

message: It's always a struggle to find any critical response but a review at IGN indirectly describes "Batgirl: Year One" as one of the "delightful surprises" of the various Year One stories. Black Lightning: Year One #1 Review -- Horkana (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 
Talk:Sundae (sausage)

message: Are the leaves used actually perilla leaves (깻잎) instead of sesame leaves? The similarity of korean names for sesame (깨) and perilla (들깨) causes no end of confusion, further complicated by perilla leaves being called 깻잎 instead of 들깻잎. 75.185.66.16 19:39, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaves: Perilla versus Sesame 

message: Please rename this article to "sundae (Korean food)". 
Per the style manual, the name of this article should use Revised Romanization; i.e., sundae. Of course there is already an article with that name for the ice cream dessert, hence the addition of " (Korean food)" to the article name, to disambiguate. 75.185.66.16 21:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it to "sundae (Korean food)", but you don't need to request me to do it bc I don't own this article. --Appletrees 21:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for renaming the article. Since I am not registered with Wikipedia, I can not log in, and so I can not rename/move an article. Hence my request for someone else to do it. 75.185.66.16 01:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming this article 

message: This subject not notable enough for a separate article from the food itself.  vlad§inger  tlk  03:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that Sundae Town is already mentioned in this article, I would support a redirect. Flat Out let's discuss it 04:26, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

text: I support too. — Revicomplaint? 08:35, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

text: I am picking up 1,000+ Google hits and at least one reliable mention in a book: . I'd vote to keep it separate. (Disclaimer: the creator is a student of mine). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Sundae Town]] 

message: Whoever wrote the  soondae's origin as 19th century  is very very wrong. The earliest recorded history about soondae is 563AD and it was from northern part of Korean Peninsula (since soondae itself is popular food in northern part of old korea, currently north korea) . Problem is  the only way source i could find  to prove "563AD" is in korean and some overzealous user(or a moderator) is keep saying that only english source can be used since this is an english wikipedia and no other gibberish(it actually said gibberish ) are allowed except source written in english... It said it would revert any edit made by me if i use referenced written in different "gibberish" 
Also the picture is not the right one. Those are instant(sort of like cheap frozen?) soondae not the traditional soondae. 
 Rmskawk (talk) 12:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong history
Talk:Otero College

message: Neither Koshare Indian Museum nor Koshare Indian Dancers contain enough information/activity to warrant separate articles, so I propose summarizing their content in the existing section of this article.FriendlyFred (talk) 03:06, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose either merge, per WPScouting MOS, both meet threshold of notability requirements.Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

text: Per :Wikipedia:Link rot, "Do not delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer. WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online." Your removal of sourced content smacks of gaming the system to get the articles merged here.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of Koshare Indian Museum/Dancers
Talk:Ralston Creek (Colorado)

message: There is a move discussion in progress at Talk:Ralston (disambiguation) which may be interest to people interested in this page Purplebackpack89  05:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion
Talk:Red Hill Pass (Colorado)

message: Colorado DOT lists the summit elevation as 9993'.  However, based on the USGS topo map, I believe this is incorrect.  The topo shows a benchmark at the summit with elev. 10,051'.  On the main page, I have cited another source that agrees with this higher figure.  CDOT's error can possibly be traced back to the elevation of the original Red Hill Pass (just to the north of the current pass), which shows an elevation of 9986' on the topo.  When the highway was rerouted to use the next gap to the south, it's possible that CDOT never updated their elevation data. Niobrara (talk) 17:54, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summit elevation
Talk:Old Cumnock railway station

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. I will move the second to Cumnock railway station, Ayrshire (1872–1951) per 's arguments, but further discussion of this name may be appropriate. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: And the Australian Cumnock and the dab page will stay the same. Liu1126 (talk) 14:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 April 2024
Talk:Siege of Sangin

message: Article is still missing some information, like civilian casualties, coalition wounded, coalition commanders. Any help appreciated. Raoulduke47 20:39, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is very biased in favour of NATO forces and doesn't read like an encyclopedia entry, using words like Taliban "masacred 32 civilians" and implying that the Taliban are growing opium.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superdantaylor (talk • contribs) 17:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Verifiability is not an alternative to neutrality. Moreover, the citation provided for the massacre claim was misinterpreted. --Joshua Issac (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 

message: The Guardian article does say 'armoured column' but the overall inference is that this means tanks. The Royal Marines do use armoured vehicles but these are not tanks, but a form of amphibious APC notably http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BVS10. Perhaps that should be added something like 250 marines via 'armoured transports'...? Bunnyman78 (talk) 14:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armoured Column
Talk:Sunlight Ski Area

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.sunlightmtn.com/the-mountain and http://www.sunlightmtn.com/the-mountain/history. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dpmuk (talk) 01:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Alamo Placita, Denver

message: If you look at the map of Denver neighborhoods, 
, 
Alamo Placita is not there. I think it is not really an official neighborhood. The area described as the Alamo Placita neighborhood is really the Speer neighborhood. Denverjeffrey (talk) 13:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Alamo Placita Really a Neighborhood of Denver?
Talk:Dead Tone

message: 1) A cursory internet search only returns IMDB and other unaccaptable 2ndary sources
2) The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM
3) There is no  full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.
4) The film appears not to be widely distributed in the US and it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. 
5) The film is not historically notable.
6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals. 
7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema. 
8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.
10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program. 
11) The film does not represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema. 
I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 17:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Tournedos

message: Cute story. Is there a reference to go with it? --Alvestrand 20:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The original incarnation of this article was a redirect to filet. This was correct. The dish that the current page purports to describe is tournedos Rossini. The description give is incorrect in many aspects, however. The cut is never sirloin, always filet mignon (that's what tournedos means), it is pan-fried in butter, and served on a crouton of brioche. The foie gras is never paté, as asserted here, but whole liver, placed raw into the steak butter, and merely warmed. The dish is, as stated, then served with a madeira sauce and black truffles to garnish.
The "before and after" pictures are problematic in themselves. The first shows, I think tournedos, though by its colour it is of a quality never used in such a dish. The second I am unsure of, but it is certainly neither the recipe described, nor tournados Rossini. I doubt very much that any user has a picture of true Rossini home-made, given the prohibitive cost of the ingredients, and the difficulties of making a true demi-glace sauce in anything other than a large-scale catering environment.
So, what should be done with this page? My proposal would be that it become a disambiguation page, refering to "filet mignon, a fine steak cut of beef," and "tournedos Rossini, a recipe involving the cut." The tournedos Rossini page would then describe this recipe, if indeed it were felt to be encyclopedic.
Would this be agreeable? --Che Gannarelli (talk) 11:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made the changes I suggested. --Che Gannarelli (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tournedos Rossini
Talk:Frederickton, Newfoundland and Labrador

message: These two articles refer to the same community.  They should be merged.
Neelix (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Converted plain title to dab page, per the existence of Frederickton, New South Wales and the presence of one inbound link that was using the plain title as a misspelled pointer to Fredericton, New Brunswick. Bearcat (talk) 10:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Frederickton]]
Talk:Health and diet in Elizabethan England

message: When you work on the article Health and diet in Elizabethan England, try to add some exact sources to the individual paragraphs, not just general references, and from published books are articles, not miscellaneous unpublished websites. Any librarian should be able to help. See WP:CITEDGG (talk) 20:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:St. Nicholas Church, Tallinn

message: This article is pretty good, but I have failed it because there is a section missing which could take a while to rectify. The article has no information on the architectural style of the building, which is important.
*Lead needs to be expanded because it needs to summarise the whole article. At the moment the lead is only about the history.
*The article needs more 3rd party refs. At the moment a lot of the article is sourced to the museum website. The museum owns the church so a 3rd party ref is more professional
*You need to use "St. Nicholas' Church" consistently in the article as that is how you named it. At the moment, in some places you have used lower caps or not used the dot.
*Minor artworks needs to be converted into prose
*A section on architecture is missing
*Something needs to be said about when the restoration happened and how much it cost etc. Did the church sell the building to the museum owners? how much did it cost?
*Ref #3 is someone's personal site. Who is the publisher of site 5?
*The publishers of the sites need to be written down. Do you have a page number for the book?
*"the raging hordes" is a POV statement
*The language is not so good in some places, but I can do a copyedit if the rest of the article is fixed up?
*This sounds like a major landmark, can more info be found out about it from old history books?
Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 08:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA failed
Talk:Maryland National Guard Counterdrug Ribbon

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:List of shipwrecks in 1923

message: According to HMS Ceres ships log the USS Fox collided with her stern whilst she was moored in Constantinople on 30 March rather than the stated date of 3 April.National Archives - ADM 53/73065 (19 Sept 1922 - 8 Sept 1923) LameCat (talk) 17:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: HMS ''Ceres'' & USS ''Fox''
Talk:National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (Brazil)

message: I think the official name of this agency is the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis - ANP). Propose to redirect.Beagel 16:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Page has moved. Beagel (talk) 08:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving page
Talk:Break Machine

message: The 1984 UK Chart, as compiled for the OCC in 1984 by the European division of the Gallup, was officially broadcast on Sunday, December 31st, 1984, at 5pm by BBC Radio 1. Break Machine was the second song aired at position #39 in the chart, 2.35 into the broadcast.
Andresihera (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart Position Moved
Talk:Psychic reading

message: * I think this page has been badly graffitied - Anyone who wants to make edits should discuss them and not write in big letters EDIT all over the page. I will be deleting this graffiti and the person(s) can discuss their changes properly! - KidinUK 20:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I obviously reverted to the wrong version. Sorry. ——Martinphi  (Talk Ψ Contribs) 22:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no discussion here regarding the current tags placed two months ago. I agree with these tags, but can only state as such in a general way because of this lack of discussion. I am willing to make a go with this article. However, I am a somewhat apprehensive as my first attempt to do so in February was reverted with an improper explanation in that revert's comment field. I recognize there is a need for rational skepticism policing on paranormal-related articles that are frequented with New Age SPAM, but simple reverts are weighty and frustrating when considerably more time goes into edits that have content with neutral literary care. 
That having been said. My first intended focus will be references as they are considered the cornerstone of credibility in an encyclopedia.  - Steve3849 12:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags placed February 2010 (multiple issues) 

message: I'm unsure how to edit or what to do?
Seems to have a lot of spam links  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.241.175 (talk) 13:21, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just looked at (2) and see it is a cached article from the The Boston Globe. I looked at the condition of the page during the date of this post (March 16) and am assuming the concern was for a SPAM external link which has since been removed. - Steve3849talk 04:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: information cited for (2) is going to spam affiliate page.

message: I'm now working on this page offline, feel free to add suggestions under this comment and I'll add them in if they're of quality.
Daniel Skitt (talk) 13:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm now working on this page 

message: As I am working on an update for Richard Wiseman and his 2011 book Paranormality: Why we see what isn’t there, I heard a quote that might be good to include as a confirmation of the pseudoscience comments already on the page.  I hope to get that update on in a few days.Kjbavaro (talk) 21:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2015 Update planned