lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Viewtiful Joe (TV series)

message: Am I crazy or was this cel-shaded 3d (to match teh games) when the first previews came out, and now it's regular animation?
You're crazy. :P
When the game was released on Nintendo Gamecube in Japan, a series of anime-style commercials were released to promote the game. However, they were obviously done by a different animation company (along with different voices), as the animation quality is arguably higher than the anime series itself.
Hey, that would make a good edition to the article! I'll see if I can find a screenshot to go along with it. Ppk01 09:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why not bring the Viewtful Joe anime series to Miguzi? - R.G. 05:34, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel it would be good on  Cartoon Network's Saturday morning block or Miguzi, since I'm partial to watching anime in the mornings or in the early afternoon; starts my day off pretty well, you know? -Fighting Dreamer 05:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A suggestion regarding the future of the series

message: Regardless of the dub, I really believe we should use the original terms. Considering even the game (which takes place after the anime) uses the original terms, such as "Sexy Silvia", "Six Machine/Majin", and a few others. This is just my opinion. - Mendinso
*Sadly, WP's anime policy is that English version takes priority. Matty-chan 02:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I really don't approve of the use of "Dub" terms. 

message: *It is my opinion that the Character section is too general.  The characters are more developed than they are given credit for.  Their fictional history in the anime is not fully explained in this article, and it should be in light of the anime and not the videogames, as they are not the same in some instances.SuperChencho 03:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New layout for Character section 

message: I saw a TON of problems and lies in thhis episode as well as things that are incompleted.  Such as saying that the 3 Jadow officers were banished to the real world when they never were.  And saying Fire Leo is never seen again even though he is.  It isn't detailed enough.  So I put some more detail into it.  And I'll be putting more in over time.  Unlike many people who edit this page I've actually seen the entire series.Bryanoftoons (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major problems corrected

message: Isn't the second version of Brighter Side starting at Episode 27 (and thus matching the start of the Gedow arc) and not 19 ? 77.218.200.239 (talk) 20:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brighter Side V2 ?
Talk:Ivan Andreyevich Khovansky (Tararui)

message: Polish-Muscovite War (1605-1618) mentions a battle in which 'Ivan Khovansky' took part. As the battle was around 1609 and Ivan was a commander, it is rather unlikely this Ivan, born around 1600, whas *the* Ivan Khovansky of that battle. My guess is it might have been his father - can anybody verify this? A simple name of his father may be enough. And Ivan Khovansky should became a disambig, not a redirect. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:50, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

message: The redirect Khovanski has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  1234qwer1234qwer4 19:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Khovanski]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hypodermis

message: is the fat associated with the mons/mons pubis/mons veneris part of the hypodermis?
Gringo300 03:56, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I put back in a merge proposal for Subcutaneous tissue and Hypodermis. If there is a difference, both articles should make that clear. Right now, the hypodermis article says that subcutaneous tissue is synonymous to hypodermis. The subcutaneous tissue article uses a picture with both lemmata used for the same thing. --Abdull (talk) 09:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Alek Stojanov

message: This phrase is misleading as Stojanov well predates Tucker's entry into the NHL. -J21
Stojanov was also much larger than Tucker. At the time of the trade, Craig Patrick (Penguins GM) envisioned him to become a power forward to replace Kevin Stevens. It never worked out. Stojanov could skate well, but had hands of stone. He was quickly relegated to enforcer duty, then a serious car accident ended his NHL career for good. He later recovered enough to play minor league hockey, though. 84.180.31.139 08:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In the mold of Darcy Tucker"? 

message: Does anyone know if he's finished his firefighting training? I can't find updated information on that. -RomeW 09:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firefighting
Talk:Classifying space for U(n)

message: For the case N=1,it is incorrect to say EU(1) = CP^\infty.  This is not contractible,for one thing,
and contradicts what is said above about the general case, where EU(n) is the set of orthonormal
N-frames in Hilbert space.  So for N=1, this reduces to the case of the unit sphere in Hilbert
space - which is contractible - see e.g. http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week151.html Cgwaldman 06:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like the same thing to me, isn't it? linas 07:04, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Not at all. The only complex projective space that is ismorphic to a shpere is CP(1). If I remember well, the unit sphere in a Hilbert space is contractible (please correct me if I'm wrong or write a reference if you know one) whereas CP^\infty has its cohomology isomorphic to \mathbb{R}[X^2]. S.racaniere 23:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

message: In particular, what is the action of S^1 on S^{\infty}? It's not really evident for someone who is new to this matter. Kromsson (talk) 08:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Case of n = 1 (first construction)" is not very clear 

message: I'm confused about the notation for EU(n). It seems to me to be saying that this space is just n orthogonal vectors. What is meant? Perhaps the set of the spans of all such things? Sorry if I'm just not familiar with the notation and I'm being dumb!
Jjw19 (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation? 

message: The computation of the cohomology of BU(n) is almost complete nonsense.  What one can deduce from the argument is that there is a homomorphism from H^*(BU(n)) to the ring of W-invariant polynomials.  This homomorphism is given by applying the functor B to the inclusion of T in U(n), and observing that it commutes with the action of the Weyl group by conjugation.  However, the whole point is to show that it is a bijection, which the "proof" certainly does not accomplish.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.236.237 (talk) 14:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogus Proof
Talk:Dan Snyder (ice hockey)

message: Why is he stated as a player of Chicago, a team in the AHL but also called a teammate of Dany Heatley, who played for Atlanta in the meantime? I don't get it. --84.113.3.151 18:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: All news reports about auto accidents report whether the injured person(s) were or were not wearing any recommended and/or standard safety equipment. In this case, it'd be the seatbelt of the car. I see no mention of that in his article. Was Snyder wearing a seatbelt? I was very much expecting to read that, as I read through the article, yet that information is not found in this article.
:The article mentions he was ejected from the car, so I assume not. Jmlk17 11:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he wearing a seatbelt? 

message: Wow, $1000 bucks?  I don't understand how Marc Savard's donation, or Marc Savard being star of the week, has any relevance to Dan Snyder whatsoever.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.249.161.98 (talk) 20:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: True. Good for him, but non-notable. Bulbous (talk) 03:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruins centre Marc Savard (a former teammate of Snyder's with the Thrashers) donated $1000 to his charity after being named the #1 star of the week. 
Talk:Bobby Ryan

message: I really feel like this article needs to be incorporated into the Wikipedia entry:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espnmag/story?section=magazine&id=3782270  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.161.135.94 (talk) 17:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ESPN article on his family life 

message: My QI picture of Ryan keeps getting reverted to a blurry one. Imho does it not count where a picture is taken, he could as well be standing in an ice cream que. Everyone does not have the same hawkeyes as the ones reverting, and could therefore have benefit of a sharp image instead of a blurry. Would it be better if I cropped away the shirt and helmet? Vivo (talk) 10:51, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The pre-existing Anaheim photo is fine. It isn't nearly as "blurry" as your claim it is and it is completely acceptable for the purposes of identifying the subject. Your opinion may be biased because it's your photo that's being reverted. Why change to a photo from a team he played a handful of games with (and is quite unlikely to ever play with again) when there's no major upgrade (your opinion excluded) in the quality of the photo? The bottom line is that an NHL-related photo is more appropriate and there's no need for a change. Unless someone can upload a newer, quality photo in a Senators' uniform, it can stay as is IMO for the time being. ChakaKongLet's talk about it 12:31, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-formulate: Would a crop with only the face be better? Without a caption? Vivo (talk) 13:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Nurse crop

message: *Explanation Please---- Please explain to the layman how this crop is impemented. Am I correct in suspecting that seeds are planted early, then dug up after sprouting (destroyed), and the main crop is then planted. Or is there some other mechanism involved in its use?
:It is not a specific type of plant, it refers to the reason the crop was planted. 
For example. Clover or alfalfa are plants that grow very slowly the first year, so in order to get them
established, you plant the seeds along with seeds for a nurse crop, often oats. Both are planted in early spring (before crops like corn or soybeans) The oats grows and is harvested in mid summer. At this time 
the alfalfa or clover is still only 2-3 inches high. The oats plants acted to 'nurse' the alfalfa plants along.   Also, if there were no nurse crop, the farmer would not have any crop on the field for the first
year. 
The term cover crop is used as well.
I believe that this type of thing is done with other crops as well. Two crops are planted at the same
time, but one grows much faster and is harvested before the second does most of it's growing. --71.38.175.146 (talk) 06:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Divided government in the United States

message: from the book "The challenge of democracy" (brief edition) Huff 3rd edition Janda/Berry/Goldman (1998)
pp 234-235.  Houghton Mifflin Comapany
Shouldn't the 2001-2003 entry at least have an asterisk given that Jeffords was a Republican until May of '01?  Through that period the composition of the senate was 49 Dem, 50 Rep and 1 Ind with a Republican VP.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gradenko (talk • contribs) 10:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  table reference 

message: "Divided Government" in the United States is not about party control, it's about Executive, Legislative, and Judicial powers being separated into three different branches.  It was invented in the United States Constitution, which was written before political parties existed in the USA.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.247.29.132 (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous definition 

message: I'm not an expert in political history or political science, but I'm a fairly knowledgeable layman, and I'm not familiar with any source that identifies Watergate as the source of a general belief in the benefits of divided government. I've removed this statement before, but it's reappeared; I've now flagged it as requiring a citation. Are there any poli-sci experts out there who can help resolve this issue? Rmccowen (talk) 14:43, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced claim re: Watergate

message: The graphic on the right side of this page is excellent. Can we request one that has a longer timescale? Cecoppola (talk) 20:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Chart 

message: This article substantially overlaps in subject matter with Presidents of the United States and control of Congress. I would suggest merging them. Wyddgrug (talk) 01:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I just had exactly the same thought, and added the merge tags on both pages before seeing your comment just now. Seems a very strange coincidence that we would both come up with the same idea at the same time, given these articles have both been around for years! Perhaps the thought process was driven by the failure of Trumpcare, despite having control of both houses. Oncenawhile (talk) 11:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, that's why I was looking at the article, to get a sense of when the last few presidents have had the luxury of their parties being in control of Congress. Thanks for adding the merge templates. Wyddgrug (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion
Talk:Kenny Dies

message: The South Park article says:
:Madonna, who is ridiculed in "Kenny Dies"  Was just wondering if the specifics of that ridicule could be added to the plot summary. Thanks. - RoyBoy 800 04:50, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The South Park article says

message: "Though it could be argues whether he cared for him at all"...
I think that should be debated: for though his strives and achievements in stem-cell research did only benefit himself in the way of a new Shaky's Pizza, Cartman did cry at Kenny's door before he even knew about stem cell research. This couldv been a ploy to confuse viewers though...
No he didn't, he tried to sell the fetuses as shrimp (because stamcel research got illegal)before kenny got in the hospital.
:But when he visited Kenny he didn't know what the stem cells could be used for, only that it was something in science. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.48.50.178 (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (though it could...) 

message: This episode is very obviously based on everything that happened surrounding Terri Schiavo, a woman who suffered brain damage and became dependent on a feeding tube. So many resembles, and look at the dates. April 24, 2001, was the date on which Terri Schiavo's tube was to be removed, then the three appeals took place and the PVS diagnosis was challenged. The South Park episode first aired on December 5, 2001, between what became known as Schiavo III and Schiavo IV. I don't understand that nothing of this is mentioned in the article, but Wikipedia relies on the community, so at least now I've mentioned this. Hopefully someone else will add something about this to the article. ;-) --62.194.194.24 05:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Terri Schiavo

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kenny_Dies&action=history
The edit that was reverted simply corrected a misconception this episode promoted. Why should anyone conflate that with advocacy, and if they shouldn't, why should we be pandering to them?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.176.169 (talk) 01:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sounds like advocacy?"
Talk:The ClueFinders 4th Grade Adventures: Puzzle of the Pyramid

message: The ClueFinders 4th Grade Adventures: The Puzzle of Pyramids → The ClueFinders 4th Grade Adventures: Puzzle of the Pyramid —
The reason for the move was basically self-explanatory, but here's the required discussion anyway. 67.171.163.212 19:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose.  Go to WP:RM make a proper discussion using the templates there, including especially the name to which you propose moving it as well as the discussion framework with its instructions.  I don't remember exactly what that was, had something to do with the word the but the text of the article already uses a different version from the title.  Furthermore, why isn't this at Puzzle of the Pyramids or The Puzzle of Pyramids or The Puzzle of the Pyramids or Puzzle of Pyramids or whatever?  Gene Nygaard 16:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, but I thought this was pretty clear-cut. The person who created this article obviously misspelled the title and I've provided a link that shows what the title should be (The ClueFinders 4th Grade Adventures: Puzzle of the Pyramid) and it's the same one that's already included in the text of the article. I can't see how you have any ground to stand on or why you would even want oppose what is quite obviously the correction of a mistake. 67.171.163.212 23:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the page.  This move was just a title correction based on a source.  I also corrected it in the text; it had an extra "the" in it. -GTBacchus(talk) 05:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Cadillac XLR

message: I've replaced the previous photograph with a higher resolution one, slightly better color, the most recent version of the XLR, plus (and perhaps most importantly) showing the roadster with the top down.  Hope people like the edit, comments are welcome! --Sirimiri 04:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated Photo

message: This photograph keeps moving about the page.  Most of the time it won't show up on my screen anyway, though now it does.  In any event, it is partially obscuring the text below it. I'm using Mozilla Firefox, so am not sure if this is an aberration on the part of my browswer or just a poorly formatted page... anyone? --Sirimiri 02:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roving XLR-V photo 

message: The user at 142.201.5.100 is adding linkspam to drive people to his site.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=142.201.5.100
I am reverting the article. --Sirimiri 04:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  www.analogestereo.com 

message: A spokesman for Cadillac has confirmed that production of the XLR will end in the spring of 2009. [3]  , needs update  --Typ932 T·C 13:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  update 

message: The infobox says that the model years were from 2004 to 2009, but the article says the car went on sale in 2006. Which is right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluedragon1971 (talk • contribs) 14:36, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  model years vs. sales years 
Talk:Configuration interaction

message: Isn't this article too narrowed/particularized to variational methods?  I think the configuration interaction refers in general to take basis functions as linear combinations of slater determinants, but the article as it is written now seems to restrict to some particular variational treatment with a restricted basis set, "variational wavefunction", etc.  Can somebody suggest a reference giving a more general treatmet of C-I?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.54.95.251 (talk) 20:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I created this page, but I don't have the time to expand it right now. So go ahead and improve it if you'd like. Be bold! Karol 09:46, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Thanks, Karol. I have had a go at it. Feel free to correct it. Bduke 01:50, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I'm trying to figure what most of this means from the bottom up, and so I have a question. What are the units (if any) for Ψ?
65.78.17.194 01:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  units 

message: who first developed this method?is it older than Moller Plsset perturbation theory?221.133.36.14 (talk) 23:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: history

message: There are at least three major CI codes in nuclear physics (as opposed to atomic physics / quantum chemistry as currently discussed in the article). These include: MFDn, BIGSTICK (formerly REDSTICK), and nushellx. There is a related code called trdens. I'm of a mixed mind about whether this is worth mentioning in the article so I thought I'd post it here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.125.237.151 (talk) 00:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nuclear Physics
Wikipedia talk:ViewPOTD

message: Mission statement: to have POTD content quickly linked to by other webs, without necessarily involving the page viewer in POTD intracacies.
Keep it simple.
I applaud the idea, but how I don't think this is usable - it looks like just another Wiki site with the template. Please add instructions on how to use it on off-wiki sites - maybe I am missing something.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:18, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you give me an example of the page doing this? Pasting the relevant html code here would make it much simpler for other users.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Texas State Highway Loop 360

message: Regarding the 0.7 mile extension at the northern end of Loop 360: If I'm not mistaken, this segment was never part of the state highway system.  There used to be a sign on Mopac simply directing drivers to "Capital of Texas Highway." There was some discussion about adding a "360" route number to the signage, because technically that segment was not part of the state highway (this was 1995 or so and it appeared in the Statesman). As I recall, the route number finally went up anyway, I guess because it was less confusing. But I moved away from the city 3 years ago so maybe the signange changed again in the meantime...? -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to TxDOT[], the extension was part of 360 from 1969 until 1996. Signage, of course, doesn't always match. Deh 14:24, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Pacific states

message: I have made a proposal to change the colour of the map box, please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. regions --Qirex 05:37, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Colours and appearance

message: The author of this article states that Nevada and Arizona are sometimes regarded as "Pacific States". I have never heard of that usage and it certainly doesn't go along with the Census Bureau designation, which includes Nevada and Arizona among the Mountain States. Discussants at the West Coast of the United States page have raised the same objection there. Under Wikipedia rules, it's not decided by what we think; it's decided by what external, verifiable supporting citations can be found. So I have inserted a "citation needed" flag on that claim. If an external source for this claim is not provided in a reasonable time I will delete the reference to Nevada and Arizona. I don't know what to do about the map, though! Any thoughts? --MelanieN (talk) 04:29, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nevada? Arizona? Really???