lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pygmy shark

message: If someone could find an image of a Pygmy shark, would be interesting to be able to see the smallest shark known. The drawing is good and it should stay but a good image could be very interesting. And if it's a good photograph it could also be a "Image of the Day" see Wikipedia:Featured pictures. --Francisco Valverde 22:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has anyone got an image of a Pygmy shark 

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:ESWAT

message: While it seems to be common practice to merge console ports of arcade games together with the arcade game entry I have spilt the two ESWAT games apart again because they are not the same game.  I have found several sources that indicate that City Under Siege is so different from Cyber Police that it is more a sequel than a port.  These two games feature different levels and weapons so therefore these should be separate.  Since the error of considering these to be the same game has persisted for so long I think it would be helpful to leave ESWAT as a sort of disambiguation page.   DBinfo 23:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shifty Henry

message: Must work on categories.  Ortolan88 23:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isnt Mr Scruffs sample from Moon Dog - Birds Lament?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.255.220 (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moon Dog 
Talk:Jedi (game engine)

message: The Internet Archive isn't a permanent archive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.86.185 (talk) 07:37, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive link dead 
Talk:IMUSE

message: Though this may be patented, the same idea is employed in other games  (Nolf2, for example).  Is there a generic word for when the music in a game elegantly varies with the intensity of the content?  It could be its own article. --Johnruble 15:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  similar stuff 

message: From the article:
The iMUSE system is patented by LucasArts,
...but my reading of the linked patent is that it should be expired, as it was applied for 27 years ago and granted 24 years ago. Thus, I think it should now read "was patented". Am I reading it wrong?
Prof Wrong (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent expired...?
Talk:KNOM

message: Tom Busch, longtime manager of KNOM has continued to delete important information about the history of KNOM and its founder Father James Poole.  By editing (and creating this article) Tom and other KNOM staff violate Wikipedia's "Conflict of interest" guideline.  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest
There are still cases in court which might be affected by the posting deleted.  In addition there are other potential complainants who may feel intimidated through the appearance of names on this website even though past press coverage also included names.  It does not feel proper that Wikipedia contribute to possibly convincing the persons affected to refrain from exercising their rights. VelvetDixie (talk) 00:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: KNOM
Talk:Helmut Maier

message: Not to put down Maier's (fine) work, but isn't "he has made significant progress in the study of the twin prime conjecture" a bit much? (Note that no sources are given.) If I understand correctly, Maier has made some contributions to our understanding of conflicting heuristics on gaps between primes - a matter that has *a relation* to the twin prime conjecture. Feketekave (talk) 16:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Louisville

message: It appears from this URL that user:Essjay has edited this page no less than 10 times. As this user apparently lied about his credentials, a thorough reexamination of this article is in order. I will begin verifying this information tomorrow. Firsfron of Ronchester 05:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Roman Catholic Church#Fact-checking Lima 10:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Needs sorting out anyway, as it isn't properly referenced, quite apart from the business concerning Essjay's liberties with the truth. Moreschi  Request a recording? 22:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Where are the checks that were going to be made in June?  It is now two months later and the factual accuracy tag remains.  Please be more specific on facts that need to be checked instead of a wholesale question of the page.  Mfields1 00:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact-checking

message: The Sex abuse scandal section focuses on one priest.  Only the last sentence is relavant to the diocese.  This section needs work.  Mfields1 00:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex abuse scandal

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Palmetto Ridge High School

message: I agree completely with the wikilinking.  However, the context of ____ American is understood for the name.  One could add American to every cultural heritage listed there.  Thus, I reverted the naming back to what the CCPS uses for their demographics page.  That was why the names were used in the first place, the original source listed them as such, meaning that when they requested students to select their race, those were the exact choices and number that claimed to be of that race. - Jake - Bladeswin | Talk to me | 03:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To: Dark Tichondrias Re: ____ American

message: Well Dalbury, you see how I copied things from Naples High to Palmetto...  I thought I got all those instances...  Thanks for catching my mistakes! - Jake - Bladeswin | Talk to me | 00:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>*whistles innocently*</nowiki>
Talk:Alien Arena

message: Afaik 2008 is the latest. But it is not another game just a newer version. Screenshots can be kept till someone uploads new ones. -- Cyger (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  version 

message: These screensots have been put on the page with the specific agreement of the creator of the game; in fact, it was his idea (we've discussed this on the forum.) There is no copyright infringement here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.90.47 (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  QUIT REMOVING THE SCREENSHOTS! 

message: Not only is the section written in a very defensive and poor tone (not to the standard of Wikipedia), but the "positive" reviews posted are not valid sources for Wikipedia. All five are self-published, possibly blogs, and one link no longer exists.
Furthermore, the negative reviews of the game should not be defaced with the comment that it's written by "other game communities." For example, the review discussed there was not for another game community, it was negative to the very poor quality of the Linux.com article. The version the comment is at now, the section is biased and should be modified.
I would have made these changes myself, but I doubt they would have stayed for long. As it is, the section is poor and should be modified. I enjoy Alien Arena 2008 and hope to see a good article written for it at some point. This can happen without such defensive writing.
Here's a new suggestion:
Reception for Alien Arena has typically been positive, (cite several reviews), with reviewers noting that, "quote review" (cite review). Some negative points have been written as well, with some reviewers discussing the "quote review" (cite reviews). 64.213.218.195 (talk) 03:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Reception" section 

message: This article has come along way since it was given a "start" classification. It's about time this article was given further consideration for a "C" rating.
67.169.152.137 (talk) 02:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps reassessment is an order 

message: If they're examples and not sources, perhaps they belong in "external links?"
-MaxWinsForever (talk) 18:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do game reviews really belong in the references section? 

message: The game engine has no citations, yet all the information is factual. Is it okay to cite the game itself, or the source code of the game?
-MaxWinsForever (talk) 06:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it appropriate to cite the game's source code 

message: Hi. Screenshots can be found in :Commons:Category:CodeRED: Alien Arena. The PD notice is hard to find but check http://red.planetarena.org/media.html#tag1 and read the first line (orange) "Alien Arena Screenshots released into Public Domain". Feel free to upload more to Commons but make sure to add  so that admins will check and review the files. I think most of the old screenshots was ok too but they are now gone and now hard to review. --MGA73 (talk) 20:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshots
Talk:George Vecsey

message: I started this article but, because I do not get the NY times or pay for the online access I haven't been able to get access to all his articles. If anyone has access please fill in some of the more recent activities he has been involved in, such as his views on current events. Quadzilla99 13:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Snaggletooth shark

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 09:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: The shark is rarely seen, but there's a commercial fishery for it?
IAmNitpicking (talk) 18:12, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rare but common?
Talk:Professional Graduate Diploma in Education

message: As I'm intending to do a PGDE in Scotland, and as I'm currently looking for which uni to join, more info here for the future would be nice (not just for me of course) Jamandell (d69) 00:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Can someone elaborate as to why the PGDE doesn't grant postnominals? I am well aware that the qualification is not a degree level course, but then nor are the PGDip or CertEd (etc) and these qualifications grant postnominals as far as I can see. In addition, the PGDE and indeed PGCE are listed on the Wikipedia list of postnominals. I have also noticed that the Open University specifically mention that their PGCE *does* grant postnominals on their course website. Can someone clear this all up? Twrist (talk) 22:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Postnominals
Talk:Atua

message: *EAS    `Atua. :Dios, ser potente, ente sobrenatural (Bxn. 1972).
*EAS1   Atua. :Gentleman, god, Lord (Fts).
*EFU   `Atua. :Deity (Bgs)@
*EUV   `Atua. :Dieu, divinite (Rch)@
*HAW   Akua. :Deity@
*MAE    I/tua. :Supernatural being (Clk).
*MAO   Atua. :Deity@
*MFA   Atua. :God (proper name) (Clk)@
*MQA   Atua. :Dieu. s'emploie le plus souvent au pluriel en parlant des hommes (Dln)@
*MVA   Etua. :A deity, a god (Tgr)@
*NIU   Atua. :Deity@
*OJA   `Akua. :Deity (Tpe)@
*PEN   Atua. :A god or spirit (Cbl)@
*PUK    Atua. :God
*RAR   Atua. :Deity@
*REN   `Atua. :God, spirit, deity, worship (Ebt)@
*SAM   Atua. :Deity@
*TAH   Atua. :Deity@
*TIK   Atua. :Supernatural being or object; spirit; ghost; goblin; god (Fth)@
*TOK   Atua. :God, supreme being (Sma)@
*TON   `Otua. :Deity@
*TUA   Atua. :Deity@
*WFU   Atua. :God@
*WEV   Atua. :God@
Kahuroa 00:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Linguistics

message: I have issue with the statement In modern contemporary culture, Atua is best recognised to most westerners as the god that is worshipped by the character Angie Yonaga in the game Danganronpa V3: Killing Harmony. The original editor simply cited google search results, as per: Most people in the west solely associate the concept of "Atua" with the character. 99% of google image results for "Atua" on google are from Danganronpa. which is likely a violation of WP:NORN, and the articles cited are simply coverage of the game's release and only mention the Atua in hindsight. Along with this, the Atua mentioned by Yonaga within the Japanese source material is referred to as "the God" (神さま) rather than any specific deity. It was only referred to as the Atua during localization, and Yonaga's ethnicity within the source material is left ambiguous, furthering my concerns. --Ornithoptera (talk) 22:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I know the above is in regards to a debate about this inclusion from the past, but regarding the more recent edits, there is no one source that directly states "Atua is often associated only with a Danganronpa character because westerners are ignorant swine who don't know their culture", but exceptions should be made for such a common sense occurrence as this. Excluding my personal experiences (which indicate that most people who play Danganronpa think the writers invented the concept of Atua and don't know it's a thing until they play DRV3), it seems entirely nonsensical to not include a mention of this, given that when you google image search "Atua" images of the Danganronpa character take over the entire screen. IMO, Wikipedia should allow these kinds of trivial inclusions to be sourced via image screenshots (as in, I can source "Angie's character is largely associated with Atua" via a screenshot of an "Atua" google image search), or some such, because this not being able to be included due to a lack of a direct source that outright says the assertion feels like a violation of common sense. --2A02:C7C:72DA:B300:7169:504C:9C4A:C10C (talk) 17:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Danganronpa's Atua
Talk:Multistable perception

message: I have removed the following sentence: "In the 1980s, multistable visual patterns caught the attention of philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists". This statement both contradicts other comments made in the article and is, to be frank, of little merit. Multistable perception has interested philosophers, psychologists, artists and many others throughout history, and is far from confined to the 1980s. The Penrose's and Escher were active in the 1950s and '60s. Louis Albert Necker was conducting research in the 1820s and '30s, I guess you can all see where I am going with this... Rje 00:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading statement

message: The sentence "The fascination of multistable perception probably comes from the active nature of endogenous perceptual changes or from the dissociation of dynamic perception from constant sensory stimulation." is really complicated. I would change it myself, but I'm not quite sure what it even says. Is there a way to simplify this statement in more lay terms, or at least clarify it so a lay person could get the gist of it?Davepetr (talk) 03:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence too technical 

message: "Multistable perceptual phenomena are a form of perceptual phenomena in which there are unpredictable sequences of spontaneous subjective changes."
In a word: WHAT?! Never mind the poor grammar (phenomena is plural, therefore is not "a form" -- "are a form"?! Seriously?!), aside from that the sentence makes utterly no sense at all. Serious rewording is needed. --71.235.188.9 (talk) 18:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst lead sentence I've ever seen. 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Gestalt shift and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 24#Gestalt shift until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gestalt shift" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Lake Ilmen

message: The image I added was an unique for Wikipedia image of the lake. The image placed instead of my one is the same image as in Volkhov River article. I intended to fill Wikipedia with original free-licensed content and escape doubling (furthermore my image shows the lake and the current one shows the river). I don't insist on keeping my image, though. Ss r 00:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy

message: He's one of the faculty members of Blou, in case you read the article history and was wondering about the name.  —  Rickyrab | Talk 00:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Pucher 

message: If an article needs editing, identify what needs to be changed here on the discussion page and then somebody can change it. DO NOT just put a massive banner at the top of the article stating that revisions are required, it looks hideous and does absolutely nothing to fix the problem. supraphonic (talk) 23:46, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Trikekus (:3) 00:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is still likely copyrighted material in this article, according to Earwig's Copyvio Detector. Trikekus (:3) 01:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Deal's Gone Bad

message: For whatever reason, this article was prodded even though it already survived an AfD; it is in no way an uncontroversial deletion. Anyway, four of their full-lengths were given 4.5 star ratings by Allmusic (!), e.g. ; see also , , etc. Chubbles (talk) 13:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: Is this band notable? There are many bands on Allmusic and MANY bands tour a lot, I would say not notable.--Justhangin (talk) 09:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The result of the deletion discussion linked above what the the band meets WP:MUSIC. --Ronz (talk) 15:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

text: There's other press coverage cited above and in the AfD. This group has had a substantial run of full-lengths and media coverage enough to hurdle WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 19:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just FYI two of the links go to there record label which wouldn't hurdle WP:MUSIC I don't believe. One link is dead and one is the All Music link. Googling them doesn't do much either.--Justhangin (talk) 03:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:John McKay (mathematician)

message: Note spelling of family namer is McKay   and not as listed below.
John McKay 194.35.219.99 (talk) 21:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently McNames are sorted under Macnames for some reason.  All of the visible spellings are correct. JackSchmidt (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Anderson Gray McKendrick

message: ::: including the widely used McKendrick–Von Foerster partial differential equation
::: 
:::::  \frac{\partial n}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial n}{\partial a} = - \mu(t,a) n. 
:::
::: where n is.... and t is.... and a is..... and μ is....
: 
Something is missing above, in a way that is disrespectful to the reader. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unjustifiable omission