lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jan Terlouw

message: Do we really need to redundantly add the date in the first paragraph, right below the title sentence says (born on date)? ugen64 03:55, Dec 7, 2003 (UTC)
:Nope.  Thanks to you and Danny for the formatting BTW. - Hephaestos 03:57, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Briefgeheim is also a very famous work from him, should be there also i guess.
Sources can be found on nl.wikipedia. 
--Kim Bruning (talk) 19:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:List of North American birds: non-passerines

message: The consensus for group and species bird accounts is to use Handbook of Birds of the World for the northern hemisphere and HANZAB for the southern. This because different regions use different classification systems (at least four English language ones for North America, Britain and Ireland, South Africa and Australia and New Zealand). 
Whilst it is reasonable for a regional list to use its local system, as in this major article, obviously we want to avoid say Peregrine Falcon being constantly moved between Accipitiformes, Falconiformes and Ciconiiformes.
----
The use of the term unfortunately is blatently POV regardless of the goodness or badness of extinction.  To address you concern however, extinction is a naturally occuring event that can open new niches in the ecosystem allowing increased diversity in the ecosphere.  While I personaly hold the view that extiction is in geenral harmful in the short term, and that man made extictions may be harmful in the long term, such topics are mroe rightly addressed under the article Views of Extinction. AQBachler 07:09, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy

message: HBW lists Northern Pygmy Owl as Glaucidium californicum and Mountain Pygmy Owl as G. gnoma. Is this a new split? jimfbleak 07:22, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: owls
Talk:Snowflake (gorilla)

message: I am suspicious that the paragraph with this quote, including "harvest testicles" is bunk.  People fooling around... I've looked on line by google search for supporting information and have found none.  The citations look weak.  I include the next "David Taylor" paragraph in my suspicion.  I've just deleted two dubious, non-sourced alternate names for the gorilla ("buttercup" "vanilla gorilla").  Reluctant to continue cleanup by deletion, however.  As is common, the text from the article is spread over the internet, so searching for information just turns up a reflection of this article.  If there was this genetic/breeding effort, there would be scientific publications to support it, I should think (rather than an ancient, obscure (fictional looking) newspaper article with no link...).  Bdushaw (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: To note that per comments above, others had similar suspicions dating to 2008.  No citations in 14 years... I should think if there was an IVF program, that would have been noted in the citations giving information about the offspring.  Bdushaw (talk) 12:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

text: I've found numerous eulogies for Snowflake in reputable places (NBC, AP, etc.) and none of them mention any of the above notions.  I feel more confident about removing the above text.  I noted also that "harvest testicles" had been removed before.  Those that feel these facts are true should feel free to restore the text with reputable citations to support.  Bdushaw (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Please send more white gorillas." ???
Talk:Teresa of Ávila

message: Because Teresa of Ávila is revered for her reformation of the Church, I expected a bit more explanation as to what exactly she reformed, what the main contributions are. This is buried here and there as nuggets in the text, and from what I gather it's mostly the monastic life and contemplative/mental prayer. Elsewhere, I read that she also contributed a lot on the role of suffering (which would make sense). I am nothing close to familiar enough with the topic to write about this, but it would be great if someone better versed in this literature could write a section about her contributions to the Church (heritage?) and what her contributions actually were (in summary). effeietsanders 00:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemplative prayer - doctor of the Church 

message: UNDER the Complete Poetry of ... it Should NOT read "New Orleans University" but rather " University Press of the South, New Orleans...." Please fix! Thank you, Eric W. Vogt 2601:601:9980:9DB0:A927:4B3D:37E5:5210 (talk) 04:37, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in list of works. 

message: Saint Teresa of Ávila was born on Wednesday, the proleptic Gregorian 7 April 1515, and died around 9:00 PM (20:00 GMT) on Thursday, the proleptic  Gregorian 14 October 1582. 179.99.165.113 (talk) 03:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth of Saint Teresa of Ávila and her death 

message: Quote from forthcoming autobiography of Esme Langley - is there any corroboration of this allegation?
Vendeka (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drew attention by skulking at the back?
Talk:Jaguar Cars

message: As with the Land Rover article, I've tried to align the brand ownership content (prose and infobox) with what I have been able to glean from the UK trademark registry. The records are not complete, so some interpolation might have crept in, but that website is surely the most reliable source available for this information. Any ideas about how this information might be improved upon and made more accurate or reflective of the reality would be appreciated. -- DeFacto (talk). 23:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brand ownership 

message: Since the XJ is no longer being produced or sold it should be removed from the list and the XF-L should be added to the list in one way or another
:I'm not that aware of the Jaguar range, so another editor may give you more feedback on that. But, if you think the list is wrong you may be bold and fix it. Be aware of WP:BRD. --Urbanoc (talk) 17:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Cars List 

message: Hello,
The article provides wrong information about Jaguar Cars going defunct in 2012.
In reality, it was just renamed to Jaguar Land Rover Limited.
Here is the company record in the official register - see the previous names section at the bottom, and here is a document confirming the name change.
Jaguar Land Rover should not have a separate article, because it is the same company.
Alternatively, this article may be cleaned up to represent the brand only, and the company info should be moved to "history" in Jaguar Land Rover.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.217.58.11 (talk) 18:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Jaguar Cars is no longer a car manufacturing company, all Jaguar and all Land Rover cars have been manufactured by Jaguar Land Rover since 1 January 2013. This article covers the use of the Jaguar marque from its inception to the present day, as well as the Jaguar Cars company until it stopped making cars at the end of 2012. -- DeFacto (talk). 14:49, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jaguar Cars did not go defunct in 2012 

message: The wrong tense has been used in relation to the sales of the F-Type stating that "Sales will begin in 2013" Alex Argent (talk) 10:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies. I meant the commencing of sales in 2013, not production. Alex Argent (talk) 10:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  it will help if you can provide a reliable sources that states when sales began. M.Bitton (talk) 15:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Throast  me! (talk | contribs) 14:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2023 

message: What’s the deal with this page being protected? It’s just a page about a car what’s the problem with it? 2601:152:4A7F:8080:8108:5748:3805:52FE (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for protection
Talk:Cambridge Conference Network

message: I have given the article a bit of a rewrite and added details of the organisation's views on climate change in particular. I am concerned that the only references are back to the organisation's own website, hence the use of the word 'claim' in relation to its membership. I also an concerned that the last post was made over 3 years ago. PeterEastern (talk) 15:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I edited some refs as follows:
* Reduced redundancy (there were two refs to the same Times Higher Education article).
* Noted that the CCNet homepage link is a dead link.
* Removed 'The Colbert Report' as per WP:CIRCULAR.
* Noted failed verifications (in relation to hate mail from children).
Additional issue:
* Article title is "CCNet (network)" which gives the impression of being a physical network (such as a computer network).  For accuracy, perhaps "(network)" should be changed to something like "(online discussion forum)", "(online chat room)", "(online publication)", etc.  This is also to prevent it from being confused with CCNET which was an actual computer network (as noted on the DECnet page).  I propose to update the title accordingly.
If there is any alternate proposal, please discuss here.  Thanks.  -- HLachman (talk) 22:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that it should be changed. It should also be removed from the category "Academic computer network organizations" since this seems to consist of physical computer network providers for academic institutions in various countries. It was never a chat room, nor really a publication. As far as I can tell from receiving CCNET emails for a few years (and from the archive of posts) is that it was just an email list. Hence "CCNet (email list)" might be better? An alternative is to delete the page if it isn't notable. Is an email list ever notable? The email list and hence CCNET are no longer active and the archive page has been removed (though there is a copy of posts up to July 2006 on the wayback machine ). TimOsborn (talk) 07:47, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I made some layout edits, grouping sentences into paragraphs and a section on climate change.  Also removed the Academic computer network organizations category, as noted above. Despite making these edits, I can't see why CCNet is notable. TimOsborn (talk) 10:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

text: I support HLachman's proposal for a merger. As far as I have seen, CCNet is intrinsically linked with Benny Peiser (e.g. none of the archived archives I looked at were edited by anyone but Peiser) so it fits best on Peiser's page as one of his notable activities. TimOsborn (talk) 23:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various issues
Talk:Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis

message: The following is an extract from the newly updated Declan Costello article
Do other editors feel a short synopsis of the above warrants inclusion in the College and early career subsection of Jackie's article, or would it be considered too trivial given the scope of her life? I'm not sure how many or how few credible suitors Jackie had before her first marriage. For reference, the "Costello" family mentioned above is the family of John A. Costello, who at the time was Taoiseach (Prime Minister) of Ireland. That is to say, the most politically powerful man in Ireland at the time. Also, while the above doesn't get into it, Jackie continued to correspond sporadically with both Father Joseph Leonard and Costello as late as the late 1960s, if that influences how people view whether this was trivial or significant relantionship. CeltBrowne (talk) 01:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a mildly interesting sidelight in the lives of Jackie and Declan, but I'm not sure it even belongs in the Declan article. The quotations by Jackie are the only thing that rise above the background, but they don't really seem to justify inclusion of the anecdote in this article, since there never was an actual dating relationship between the two principals. DonFB (talk) 08:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jackie and [[Declan Costello]] 

message: Under the section RELATIONSHIP TO ROBERT F KENNEDY
"He credited *Kennedy* with convincing him to stay in politics..."
The reference to Kennedy can be confusing since there's several Kennedy's mentioned in the article.
I suggest changing it to...
"He credited *Jacqueline* with convincing him to stay in politics..." 50.5.111.73 (talk) 07:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarified that section, thanks for spotting. --Marbe166 (talk) 07:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

text: Just to clarify: the subject of the article is always the only one who is referred to using a bare surname. Others are referred to by their first names (if related) or their full names (if unrelated). Exceptions are for lists of family members or when the usage of surname alone would be confusing in the context. All other Kennedys here should be referred to by their first names only. MOS:SAMESURNAME WP Ludicer (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 January 2022 

message: Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 02:47, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary might be too long 

message: Hello, there.
I have reason to believe that this image is in the public domain and is a suitable replacement for the current one. Less light is concentrated on her face, not as blurry, et cetera.
That's all. Thanks. 71.184.82.123 (talk) 02:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Image Proposal
Talk:Julius Caesar Scaliger

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
The 1911 bio surely warrants at least a B.
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 05:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Useful entry, helpful for finding out more. It is just a shame that the Wiki has to resort to 1911 encyclo entry, but still that's better than nothing !!!Norwikian 14:42, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: In the introduction to the eighth edition of his book The Pursuits of Literature, Thomas James Mathias relates an anecdote about Scaliger and Erasmus. Apparently, Erasmus thought Scaliger's then-anonymous oration against Ciceronianus
had been written by Hieronimus Aleander. 
I just thought it was interesting, and wonder if anyone thinks it could or should be included in the article. Cadwaladr (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anecdote

message: I have revised the article, simplifying the style (which clearly owes a lot to the 1911 Britannica entry) and removing subjective elements.Colin Ryan (talk) 12:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: I removed the paragraph about the naming of the Julian Period for Julius Caesar Scaliger. It wasn't. Many references say that the Julian in "Julian Period" is named after Joseph Scaliger's father Julius Scaliger. For example, The World Almanac for 1990 says "The Julian period was devised in 1582 by Joseph Scaliger and named after his father Julius (not after the Julian Calendar)" (Hoffman 1990:269). However, those references are wrong. In the introduction to Book V of his Opus de Emendatione Temporum, Joseph Scaliger wrote, "Iulianam vocauimus, quia ad annum Iulianum accommodata, & quidem a Kalendis Ianuarij" which translates roughly to "We have called it Julian merely because it is fitted to the Julian year, and from the first of January". (Scaligeri 1629:361). 
The Julian Period is also not the same as the Julian Day Number, although they are related. The Julian Day Number was invented by Herschel in 1849. So the mention of POSIX time isn't at all like the Julian Period. That had to go too.
While adding text would require secondary references, removing text that is wrong does not. Grr (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed paragraph on naming of Julian Period for him. 

message: "He was born ... at the Rocca di Riva, on Lake Garda." - This is part of his fake biography, in which he traces his line to the House of della Scala. He was actually born in Padua, where his father was born and married. See Lilian Armstrong, Benedetto Bordon, "Miniator", and Cartography in Early Sixteenth-Century Venice, Imago Mundi: International Journal for the History of Cartography, Volume 48, pp. 65-92, Imago Mundi, Ltd, London (1996) - Eroica (talk) 10:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace
Talk:Histoplasmosis

message: This article is pretty much a word-for-word copy and paste of the WebMD article:
Jasont82 17:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up. The only part of this article I could find that matched any part of the WebMD version was the Symptom section. Am I missing something or was that what you were referring to? I've revised the relevant section (and added a ref). -- MarcoTolo 17:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Incidence and Transmission sections are also copied from the WebMD article with minor changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  Jasont82 21:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've pulled both sections for now as potential copyvios (not that I don't believe you, 206.246.142.100, just that WebMD is giving me timeouts and I can't check it myself to fix the problems). -- MarcoTolo 14:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: If anyone has any info knowledge re histo and granulomas, it would be appreciated in the article!--Xris0 (talk) 17:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  granulomas? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rwright27 (talk) 23:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENV H 453 Industrial Hygiene
Talk:Italian Greyhound

message: People often ask if my Italian Greyhound is a Whippet. I'm on the fence, would this article benefit from somehow mentioning the Whippet? Not just to inform readers of their relation, but to help disambiguate between the two. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whippet 

message: The information here, quoted "most veterinarians". is too broad and cannot be sourced. Yoclofro (talk) 03:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grooming 

message: I would be really pleased to see breed experts from around the world add valid content to this page that provides a more balanced view of Italian Greyhounds around the world. 
The breed exists all over the world, regadless of its origins (which are actually in Ancient Egypt, and not Italy) and as a lover of the breed,  regardless of which Kennel Club and which standard they fall under, I think Wiki is an important educational resource for dog people all over the world.
I believe it would be much more beneficial to have a much broader explanation of the history and evolution of the breed, and that includes talking about the differences in breed standards around the world and why they may have come about, and what it means for the breed today. 
The title of the page is "Italian Greyhound". Currnetly the FCI does not even have a breed of dog called "Italian Greyhound"  so it baffles me that the only content on this page is FCI specific?  
There are some great sources on the IG, from Lilian Barber's book (https://www.amazon.co.uk/new-complete-Italian-greyhound/dp/0961198621), Annette Oliver's book (https://www.waterstones.com/book/italian-greyhounds-today/annette-oliver/9780948955921) just to name two, as well as other credible sources such as research published by UC Davis on genetic testing (https://vgl.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk8836/files/media/documents/ItalianGreyhound20191009.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1JipuuwfFrZaiQtVsFTPR0fbMecTm_rb9ttGyM8QA6M2JHunR4a4_rnLc).
There are breed experts still around with decades of experience and knowledge and the breed worldwide would benefit from the information being readily available, not least as it has become so much more popular as a companion dog with a pet owner popultion where many will not necessarily have an in depth knowledge of the history and evolution of the breed.
Sfizimio (talk) 14:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding content to make this page more balanced 

message: If anyone is interested, "levriero" (also "levriere") means "hare hunter" in Italian. 93.66.3.187 (talk) 18:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Odakyu Electric Railway

message: This article is in some places inconsistent and completely unable to be understood.  I did some work repairing the most glaring and obvious grammatical and spelling errors, and I tried to keep the original context (when it could be understood).  The middle paragraph in the History section is disorganized and needs major work, I think.  The author of that paragraph and the surrounding sections is obviously trying to add decent information but cannot do it in some instances.  For example, the line about the Odakyu Line being sometimes regarded as a bypass of the Tohaku line mentioning Yokohama in wartime and also a 1957 speed test.  That information could be elaborated upon, but as it is it is almost schizophrenic.
If you see a sentence which sounds really odd for a native speaker to write, that means I could not understand the context of the sentence, or the relevant data, well enough to rephrase it correctly.
Wtlegis 16:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Work Needed

message: There are three articles here...silly.  Odakyu Odawara Line has to be merged with this article (Odakyu Electric Railway), and 30000 SE series.
Cleanup: Should be 3 articles named:
Odakyu Electric Railway Corporation
Odakyu Odawara Line, linked from the Odakyu Electric Railway Corporation main page
Romance Car, with a link to 30000 SE Series, as well as the 6-7 other series trainsets they have...should be taken from Odakyu Odawara Line page...but i made a booboo and called it romancecar...please fix this.  
"Some Odakyu trains from the Tama Line continue on to the Eidan Chiyoda Line at Yoyogi_Uehara."
*I Oppose with your proposal.  This page is the main page for the Odakyu Electric Railway corporation, it does not make sense to merge niether the 30000 SE series page or the Odakyu Odawara line page with this page.  Both represent items that deserve its own seperate page.  If we were to merge it all into one page, it would be like merging all the lines of JR East and all its train sets into one massive page on JR East. ps, please follow proper wikipedia guidelines when using the talk page. Limitedexpresstrain 00:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Yes, it's that way. You can find it on their Japanese site. --日本穣 Nihonjoe 19:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Romancecar