lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Muscle fiber

message: Attempted rough clean-up of content and structure of the page, but realized it should be redirected to skeletal muscle instead. Redirect proposed. Smr1 (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, the term is very general and would apply to insects and other invertebrates. Googling for "insect muscle fiber" would seem to confirm this. Cheers, David Iberri | Talk 20:06, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I need to be a bit picky about your question here. Mitosis is the process by which the nucleus of a cell divides, and then the whole cell divides by cytokinesis. A muscle fiber (myocite) is a single muscle cell with many nuclie. So yes, the nuclie have to undergo mitosis, but not necessarily cytokinesis. Raul654 23:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Muscular system

message: Female 102.176.90.14 (talk) 20:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muscular system 

message: How many system in human body.
 
How many types of muscular system. 117.205.83.13 (talk) 04:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 

message: How many types of muscular system  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.205.83.13 (talk) 04:19, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science  

message: the muscular system 117.96.174.173 (talk) 07:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  zoology
Talk:Normalizing constant

message: The definition given here is unduly narrow.  Normalizing constants arise in many places besides Bayesian probability! Michael Hardy 03:21, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: ... such as the partition function in statistical mechanics. 130.126.108.104 19:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 1

message: Might be useful to us Brits if 'Normalisation Constant' redirected here, I understand that Americans probably make up the largest group on the English speaking wikipedia but there must be a fair chunk of Canadians, Aussies, Kiwis, South Africans etc who spell this with an S, I was convinced that there was no wiki page for normalisation constants until I tried with a Z
:I took care of this Tabako (talk) 05:27, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 2
Talk:Meet the Feebles

message: I know some people are likely to object to 64.231.99.65's the inclusion of the sodomy song lyrics, that wikipedia is not a collection of movie lyrics. 
I take a different view. The production values on the move are so low that it is quite difficult to understand what Sebastian is actually saying, even after watching it many times. Plus, it's the funniest moment of the movie. So I am going to preemptively vote to keep it (should someone object) --Raul654 04:15, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looking at the movie, the Masked Masochist isn't a cockroach, he looks a lot more like a weta than a roach, but isn't completely anatomically correct as a weta either, on the other-hand he's playing the part of a sadist not a masochist so I don't think Jackson was terribly worried about being right in every detail. I've changed the description in the article. Kiore (talk) 07:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Masked Masochist - Species 

message: Please forgive my ignorance, but could someone please inform me as to why "Meshuggah" is listed as a link?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.64.2.77 (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meshuggah
Talk:Obelia

message: This page should probably be moved to a page titled "Hydroid" to be technically in line with the Tree of Life Project.  However, this genus is often referred to by just the genus name.  Any thoughts? --Mperkins 07:04, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by GrillinBubbles (talk) 14:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Invertebrate Zoology
Talk:Pseudocoelomate

message: reference for the molecular data to come once I re-find the paper. --Mperkins 07:50, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: I agree. Just remember to track down redirects. Also note: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm recently merged into germ layer. TheLimbicOne 22:14, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge suggestion
Talk:Coat of arms of Canada

message: Page may need to be updated with the new symbols adopted upon the coronation of King Charles III of Canada today. 71.173.17.175 (talk) 15:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but someone has to make free versions first. We also need reliable sources. --₪ MIESIANIACAL 15:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Hello IP 71. When those new symbols are available to add? by all means add them. GoodDay (talk) 15:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @GoodDay, Miesianiacal - I presume what IP 71 was referring to is the announcement of the new royal standard & heraldic Canadian crown today. The Canadian Heraldic Authority published this  today, with the new Royal crown. I believe the IP was requesting the arms be updated, which the CHA says will be changed (gradually). Estar8806 (talk) 01:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

text: @GoodDay, @Miesianiacal there is now a free version available here :File:Canadian Royal Crown.svg —f3ndot (TALK) (EMAIL) 02:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, however there's been no change to the coat of arms. The blazon is the same and the CHA itself has stated "Changes to symbols of sovereignty such as the Arms of Canada and to official insignia will likely take place over the coming years". Mention of the Canadian Royal Crown can be and is made in the article. But, redesigning the arms ourselves would be original research. --₪ MIESIANIACAL 02:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

text: If there's possible original research involved? then don't do it. GoodDay (talk) 03:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Update  

message: The new Crown is said to be replacing the St Edwards crown, according to its wikipedia page. Is that accurate? Is it automatic? Should the change be noted somewhere in this article? TimeEngineer (talk) 14:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is accurate ...but no new arms as of  yet..wating on a new one to be offical. Moxy- 14:55, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Crown
Talk:List of feeding behaviours

message: Feeding and food seem like two differnet topics to me (a biologist).  While food is what an organism consumes, feeding is the process by which the organism consumes food.  There are many types of feeding, such as deposit feeding, filter feeding, etc.  However, should this page be merged with the feed page that currently discusses the other uses of the word?  --Mperkins 08:50, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There does seem to be some confusion. Feeding and Eating and Obtaining Food?? Not the same. So scavenging is not actually feeding. Similarly hunting and foraging are not included here and I guess should be some how. As for hunter-gatherers?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.246.69.184 (talk) 16:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole page is very bad, and needs a lot of work.  However, typically feeding refers to mode of ingestion (and sometimes more broadly to prey-processing such as chewing or venom delivery).  What you eat would be more along the lines of "diet", IMHO. Anyhow, I'll get around to a big re-write someday, but it might be a while.  Mokele (talk) 18:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  food finding 

message: Is there such a thing as a fungivore? Anxietycello (talk) 19:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that this has been added. There's the alternative mycophage, but this apparently does duty as a synonym of fungivore and as a synonym of mycovirus. Lavateraguy (talk) 10:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fungivore? 

message: What about: Exudativore (exudativorous, exudativory) - "Feeding on gum and other exudates (that which oozes out or diffuses) from trees."
These are not particulary rare, e.g.: ("... dietary category that is remarkably prevalent among primates") - from:
:The Evolution of Exudativory in Primates; Editors: Anne M. Burrows, Leanne T. Nash; Springer, 2010; , 9781441966605; pp. 303.
Also common among possums (including sugar gliders). Sugar gliders also feed on insect exudates! (honeydew from aphids, and "manna"-> lerp: sugary structure produced by larvae of psyllid insects).
Possibly Nectivore is a sub-set of Exudivore?   Does "exude" include "secrete" AND "excrete"? -- Will look into this some more. Note: there currently is no page for Exudativore - only Exudate. 
~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 22:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exudativore
Talk:List of post-confederation Nova Scotia general elections

message: Is there a pre-Confederation list or article? 70.29.210.174 (talk) 10:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just wondering that myself as the legislature was established some decades before the 1860s. Paul MacDermott (talk) 17:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre-1867?

message: The info box currently has the party listed as Conservative, with a footnote saying that it includes Progressive Conservative results. Shouldn't this be the other way around, as the PCs are the current iteration of the provincial party? It's possible the provincial party is being falsely conflated with the federal Conservatives. Not a big deal, but something to consider for accuracy.
142.163.87.0 (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: PC/Conservative Labeling
Talk:Rothschild family

message: For some reason it is omitted in this entry
https://www.ft.com/content/92d13310-6284-11de-b1c9-00144feabdc0
https://www.reuters.com/article/britain-slavery-idUSL171535320090701OutoeSky (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The solution is simple: just write about it. The article is semi-protected, that is, this page cannot be edited by unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as accounts that are not confirmed or automatically confirmed (accounts that are at least four days old and have made at least ten edits to Wikipedia) . Semi-protection is useful when there is a significant amount of disruption or vandalism from new or unregistered users. By registering, you can edit. PrazerCambraia (talk) 14:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Their role in slave trade 

message: Was the original Jewish surname ‘Mayer’ before it was changed to the more German-sounding ‘Rothschild’? I’ve heard that claim before and it would make sense given all the family members who have ‘Mayer’ as part of their name. Overlordnat1 (talk) 07:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original name? 

message: Soo in the "Prominent descendants of Mayer Amschel Rothschild" section...
* Current: Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild, of Tring in the County of Hertford (born 1936)
* Proposed: Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild, of Tring in the County of Hertford (1936–2024)
2603:6011:9600:52C0:14ED:5E37:E028:EBB9 (talk) 04:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: For future note, WP:GOFORIT :) DarmaniLink (talk) 07:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacob passed away I guess 

message: The date this company was founded was 1827. And it had as its main and exclusive object the assurance of [any kind of] ships (fact used today against the Rothschild family with regard to slavery, for among those ships were slave-ships). The source of this information, although official, is in Portuguese language though (here). 2804:214:829F:23B7:EA1C:2BDD:E2FA:69AF (talk) 20:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alliance Assurance (1824)
Talk:Gyrinocheilidae

message: *Should the recent addition by Phle96 at the end of the article be simply reverted out or morphed into an "in aquaria" section or some such?  --Mperkins 10:04, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: That's Crossocheilus, not Gyrinocheilus. As this article notes, a number of species may also be called "algae eater", and there should be xrefs to them from here, but they're not officially part of the family. (The aquarium trade is most unhelpful in using the same name for multiple types.) Stan 18:26, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Poetess

message: This article seems really one sided, pushing the view that poetess is a derogatory word. If the article is to be kept (which I'm not sure it should be), the article should be broken down into sections, such as: 
: introduction
: historical origin and usage of the word
: modern & feminist usage of the word
Unsourced, completely biased statements such as "The word "poetess" is often used in a mildly pejorative and dismissive sense; like all the best pejoratives, it keeps open the option to deny that the person who used the word meant anything of the kind," need to disappear from the article. caz | speak 18:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; such sentences moralise rather impart any objective information. Rintrah 14:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I made a start. Rintrah 08:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The claim that poetess was sometimes used pejoratively may well be true, but the quote from Pope's Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot is a very feeble example.  In fact, I don't think it's an example at all.  The passage is pejorative because Pope says the poetess is maudlin; remove that description and poetess becomes as neutral a signifier as the others Pope uses, parson and peer.  I think the Pope quote should be junked and replaced with an example more relevant, assuming the point is accurate. 69.237.196.82 (talk) 16:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pope's usage
Talk:List of poets from the United States

message: I am moving this page to be more multiculturally sensitive.  American poets do not only include US poets.  --Cromwellt|Talk 00:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A wise move, and one I wish I'd thought of, lo, those many years ago when I first posted that insufficient list. :-) Thanks, Cromwell! Jwrosenzweig 05:04, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: move to be multiculturally sensistive

message: I don't find this list very useful as it is.  Looking in the history of the main page, one can see that many of the entries have been entered by the poets themselves.  Someone deleted an entry because the poet, this person felt, wasn't "notable" -- there are many, many poets on the list who would not be considered "notable" by most people in the poetry biz.
Here are some possible criteria to consider:
1.  Limit entries to poets whose work has been published (not just self-published) in book form.
2.  Limit entries to poets whose work has been published in nationally distributed journals and magazines.  
3.  Limit entries to poets who have an entry already in Wikipedia.
I realize that placing limitations is, in a sense, anti-Wiki in attitude.  If people want this to be an anything-goes list, that's OK, too.  Right now, though, it's a very odd mix.
Athansor (talk) 16:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed criteria 

message: For each red link, I ran the following search in Google: "<full name in list>" poet -"The poets listed below". I included -"The poets listed below" so the search didn't return any of the many Wikipedia mirrors out there. If this searched return no relevant hits, I removed the name from the list. If I've removed any legitimately notable poets, my apologies. Feel free to re-insert the names. --sanfranman59 (talk) 02:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work. On the List of Indian poets a while back, we started demanding footnotes showing notability for red links, but there's been backsliding, since. Reconsideration (talk) 13:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for my removal of non-notables 

message: Can anyone explain why burlesque performer Candy Barr is on this list? Chillowack (talk) 18:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candy Barr?
Talk:Negrito

message: The 1212 purchase of rights to settle implies that the Negrito also had boats. How else could these peoples survive, genetically. There must have been some diversity in the gene pool.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.207.90.216 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 12 December 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: 1212

message: I removed the following sentences: "They do not have a permanent place to live in because of food shortage. It depends upon the place where they live, if it can still provide them enough food." Thees sentences formed a seperate paragraph unrelated to any previous or subsequent subject, and were grammatically incorrect. Additionally, it is unclear who "they" refers to, and the entire paragraph is vague, fragmentary, and generally unhelpful.
If this is a real concern, it should be explained lucidly and with regard to the different populations and areas involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.232.40.217 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed last sentence
Talk:Halls of residence

message: "being an unknown, undetermined, or unspecified unit or thing; being one, a part, or an unspecified number of something; being at least one -- used to indicate that a logical proposition is asserted only of a subclass or certain members of the class denoted by the term which it modifies  " . Besides which, no evidence has been offered that "many" have shared rooms. In my experience (which I'm not claiming as exhaustive; unlike, it seems, others), only a couple of very many hals have had a very small number of shared rooms. Andy Mabbett 14:19, 20 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Some

message: Halls of residence or halls in British english usage refers predominantly to a student accommodation block. The likelihood (although not always the case) is that this would have individual rooms, although may well have shared kitchen or bathroom facilities. To my mind, that differs from the US usage of the term dormitory, although perhaps someone will correct me if I'm wrong. I've updated the article, and removed the proposed merge template since the discussion has gone on some time and no consensus has been reached. └ UkPaolo/TALK┐ 10:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  British usage
Talk:Heinrich Göbel

message: Why I reverted the edit on Dec 12, 03:
It has been disputed for many years who "invented" the first light-bulb. There was much parallel development and no clear winner. It would be POV to state clearly that any one individual "invented the first light bulb".
The claim that the Edison/Beacon lawsuits established Goebel as the rightful inventor is false. http://www.heinrich-goebel-realschule.de/Daten_engl.htm and elsewhere says:
Two more defendant companies present the total of over 100 pieces of evidence as well as old Goebel incandescent lamps. In front of experts, called by the court, Goebel reconstructs the tools he used at that time and also his lamps of 1859. There are inconsistent judgements for and against Edison. Edison is only successful in two processes with appeal. This does not mean that the real truth had come forth. The opposing parties do not continue wit--Hgn-p (talk) 12:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the link is no longer valid. There is now another text at the site which puts a different light on things: There were legaliteies which went both for and against Edison but Goebels blub was deemed to be original and was given priority, a belated satisfaction for the old researcher. (from http://www.heinrich-goebel-realschule.de/e_prozess.htm) -- Any more sources about this? Kruemelmo 10:45, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can make out German only with Babel Fish, but the interesting, and more extensive article in the de.wikipedia seems very well balanced.--12.72.150.30 01:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The final court judgnments in the 1890s were that the Göbel claim was yet another fraud wherein newly constructed bulbs were claimed to be very old. Edison 02:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Plaques put up by nationalists do not count for much in establishing priority of invention. Edison (talk) 04:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion prior of 2010

message: The article was replaced between January 28, 2011 and February 14, 2011. The old one was a stub. The content is a shortened version of the article in the de.wikipedia. ( I am one of two main editors of that article.)  In the de.wikipedia there are more details about the claims of Henry Goebel concerning his alleged work in the field of constructing electric lamps between 1854 and 1880 in New York, more details about technical reasons and other reasons supporting the thesis of a fraudulent defense and more details about the development of the legend.  If you want to have more details  or more references or if there is any other criticism, please give your comment here.
I kindly ask you to take care of language improvements.--Hgn-p (talk) 12:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article replaced 2011

message: Sources 9 and 11 lead to a 403 access forbidden page.
Sources 21 through 23 fail to retrieve the patents.
Source 4 is only visible to subscribers.
I would suggest removing them, with the possible exception of Number 4. 
Henry oct/01/2017
*Thank you. The links are replaced, except Number 4. --Hgn-p (talk) 22:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead links
Talk:Charles Bernstein (poet)

message: *This article is part of WikiProject Poetry. See that page for further information.
I just changed his high school matriculation date from 1948 (he was born in 1950) to the more reasonable 1968 - but I'm not sure of it - could somebody pls check this?
Ken M Quirici 01:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:I quatro rusteghi

message: Hm, one T or two in "quat(t)ro"? Google gives more hits for two, and Grove Concise and this recording agree, but the Penguin Dictionary of Music, the Penguin Opera Guide and this recording  give it with one. I don't have a clue which we should take as correct.  I know the Italian word has two Ts, but most of the libretto is written in the Venetian dialect, so maybe that explains the other spelling. Probably not very important, really, but interesting anyway... --Camembert
:Hm, good point.  Hopefully if it's Venetian someone will correct it eventually with a source; my first thought was that it was a typo though. - Hephaestos 15:48, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Brainiac

message: This is probably ripe for splitting into two real articles and a (disambiguation) page. Any objections? Phil 16:13, Dec 12, 2003 (UTC)
----
did all the names really come from eniac? the portmanteau "brain + maniac" comes to mind as a rather obvious find.
:Pop Quiz: What was the first personal computer? says:
::The GENIAC was the first of several similar machines designed and sold by Berkeley:
::Geniac = Genius Almost-Automatic Computer
::Tyniac = Tiny Almost-Automatic Computer
::Weeniac = Weeny Almost-Automatic Computer (only 60 made)
::Brainiac = Brain-Imitating Almost-Automatic Computer
:I think this makes it clear that in Berkeley's mind the -AC ending stood for "Almost-Automatic Computer" and thus confirms that it was a reference to the -AC for "automatic computer" in ENIAC et. al., and not to "maniac." If Berkeley had had "maniac" in mind, it is likely that he would have used it as the name for the first in the series.
:The GENIAC dates from 1955 and BRAINIAC from 1966. At that time, computer names ending in -AC common; in addition to the -IAC's, there was also UNIVAC which was extremely well-known to the public (having "predicted" the outcome of the 1952 election). It was a familiar meme, like -tron. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  So is it more-or-less confirmed that Otto Binder had that in mind when coming up with the Brainiac comic book character? Brainiac wasn't even originally a computer. Sunnan 08:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's why I moved the explanation in the article so it no longer says "all of these" and only applies to the toy computer. Dpbsmith (talk) 10:48, 19 December 2005 (UTC)