Talk:Weasley family/Archive 3

message: Please cite proof that Fred's name is Frederik, or otherwise, change it back to simply Fred. Without citations, I could write that their middle names are Gideon and Fabian (which is also not a fact, despite what people assume)  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 121.219.233.10 (talk) 07:43:04, August 2, 2007 (UTC) 
I'm bad at this whole editing thing but there are major spoilers for the new book in this article.
(both born April 1, 1987)[1]
Can someone point out the authoritative reference that says that it is indeed 1987 and not 1978?  --Mysidia 08:34, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Shouldn't there be a pic of them from Order of the Phoenix? They look a little different. Dahopas 15:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. If you make two articles they would contain the same information, except that Fred's would include his death. There's no reason for two different articles, and if someone did separate them they would almost certainly be merged back by someone else. There's no point. Faithlessthewonderboy 08:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 People

message: I don't know whether I'm allowed to post links on this page, so if I'm not, don't report me 'cos i never knew... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Georgewgirl (talk • contribs) 11:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, sorry. See this page: WP:EL -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Am I allowed to post links on this page thing?

message: Why is there mention of the stunt men for the "old man" scene in Goblet of fire?  Is this fact that noteworthy?  Seems to be a bit of self promotion to me, particularly when it says he was in "Star Wars", but not mentioning that he played a non-speaking robot.  Bytebear 20:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then delete it.   Be bold and all that jazz.  John Reaves 22:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention of the stunt men?

message: The article mentions that the actors for Fred and George had their hairs dyed for the role. However, I feel that most of the images provided in the article show them to still have rather blond hair. Am I growing colour-blind, or is the info provided rather misleading/inaccurate? Yengkit19 16:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red heads?

message: The end of the article seems to be biased. Someone should edit it -- seems that whmoever wrote the page blames the Twins for every single product they sell. User:Diana Prallon
I don't know that it is bias, just a truth that there are hidden consquences to practical jokes, and there is a line between good fun and meanness.  Plus, dismissing trouble by making a joke out of it doesn't work.   Darkness powder is probably funny... but at some times it can be used as a weapon.  Love potions are irresponsible.  But shoving Montoque into the vanishing cabinet led directly the Battle of Hogwarts once Malfoy repaired the Hogwarts end, and led to the disfigurement of their brother and the death of Dumbledore.    The Weasley twins are still young and while they have created some very good productions like clothing with shield charms, they have also been irresponsible in some ways.   Jclinard 09:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Out of the Standart

message: it should say characters, since this is a page for two different people - either that, or there should be two different infoboxes, but that would be a bit redundant
i would try and fix this myself, except it seems every single page to do with harry potter has been protected from editing. wikipedia - the free encyclopedia anyone can edit! 87.244.67.193 19:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Harry Potter character" 

message: but isn't there a Wikipedia policy on fictional characters that says that birth/death dates should not be at the top of te article? Faithlessthewonderboy 00:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For now, I'm going to delete the dates, but if I'm wrong feel free to add them back. Faithlessthewonderboy 00:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm not sure 

message: ===Gabrielle's age===
If Gabrielle Delacour was 8 in 1995 how could she be born in 1984? that would make her birth no earlier than 1986!
:And she certainly wasn't born in 1995; according to Dates in Harry Potter, the main death near the end of Goblet of Fire occurred on June 21, 1995, and Gabrielle was 8ish at that time.  However, that same page says that she was born c.1984, so I'm open to 1984, 1985, or 1986. Travisl 23:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question, i already asked myself too. At least: in the film you can see her in the end when they're leaving Hogwarts. So, if she stayed there after the challenge, she would have been there from the beginning of the year on. --217.80.104.240 06:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just re-read the book and she is mentioned before the last challenge, where the champions meet their families. --217.80.108.151 14:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Why should she spend the whole year at Hogwarts? If the rules in Beauxbatons are the same as in Hogwarts, she was too yound to even go to a magic scool. --217.80.115.101 11:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I can truly imagine, that Fleur dies in the last book, sacrificing herself to save Bill and/or Gabrielle. --217.80.124.151 08:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Erm. OK. I thought, that would be a good end for her. Can't understand why so few people like her. --217.224.136.78 07:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree. --217.224.136.78 07:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged from [[Talk:Gabrielle Delacour]] 

message: If Gabrielle Delacour was 8 in 1995 how could she be born in 1984? that would make her birth no earlier than 1986!
:And she certainly wasn't born in 1995; according to Dates in Harry Potter, the main death near the end of Goblet of Fire occurred on June 21, 1995, and Gabrielle was 8ish at that time.  However, that same page says that she was born c.1984, so I'm open to 1984, 1985, or 1986. Travisl 23:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gabrielle's age

message: Did she come with her sister, or what she just magically transported for the challenge? -anon
:Good question, i already asked myself too. At least: in the film you can see her in the end when they're leaving Hogwarts. So, if she stayed there after the challenge, she would have been there from the beginning of the year on. --217.80.104.240 06:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just re-read the book and she is mentioned before the last challenge, where the champions meet their families. --217.80.108.151 14:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Why should she spend the whole year at Hogwarts? If the rules in Beauxbatons are the same as in Hogwarts, she was too yound to even go to a magic scool. --217.80.115.101 11:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How did she get to hogwarts?

message: According to some rumours, Gabrielle Delacour dies at the hands of Bellatrix Lestrange in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. I think we will wait July to write that in the article.
:I can truly imagine, that Fleur dies in the last book, sacrificing herself to save Bill and/or Gabrielle. --217.80.124.151 08:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm. OK. I thought, that would be a good end for her. Can't understand why so few people like her. --217.224.136.78 07:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: Gabrielle is of little important in the series. Her article should be merged in the Minor Characters article. Lord Opeth 00:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. --217.224.136.78 07:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Character

message: I'm not sure of this which is why I haven't reverted it, but is Fred ever called Frederick? I can't remember him ever being called that, but I could be wrong. Faithlessthewonderboy 20:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frederick? 

message: I would like to suggest that an addition be made to this page to reference the character of the Weasely Twins. Specifically I would like to see a reference to the tender moment in the "Order of the Phoenix" movie when they comfort the crying first year who has just been forced to do lines for Umbrage. More than any other scene in the books or movie, that seems to be the quintessential Twins moment, where the reason they were in Gryffindor in the first place seems to be obvious. Although the movies are not canon, I still think this is relevant. (No account, but call me Coach Wade.)
:As you said, it isn't canon. Besides, this is your opinion. Faithlessthewonderboy 23:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Character

message: Haven't their middle names ever been revealed? Every other member of the Weasley family gots a middle name.
: I think Fred's middle name is George, and George's middle name is Fred. Bytebear 00:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle Names

message: On James and Lily Potter, it says their first appearence was Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, even though they are dead before the beginning of that book. I am assuming it refers to their photos' or Mirror of Erised, so then Charlie's first appearance is PoA. Supersaiyanplough|(talk) 05:22, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  first appearance 

message: Was Charlie ever the Gryffindor Quidditch captain? I've always assumed he was, but I'm not sure if it has ever been explicitly mentioned in the books. Cyclone49 09:28, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find any reference that he was. I'll remove that statement, but feel free to add it again if you find a reference. Pruneau 22:45, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "...Charlie was captain of Quidditch" (page 99 of "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone) (Duane543 02:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Quidditch Captain?

message: The article on Alex Crockford is currently up for deletion, and it appears that no sources have been cited, here or in Alex Crockford, indicating that this is the name of the actor who played Charlie Weasley in The Prisoner of Azkaban  . imdb has no listing on him, either as being in the cast of The Prisoner of Azkaban or as an actor. 
Therefore, I'm removing the assertions about him from the article. 
Anyone is welcome to reinsert them... with a source citation from a reliable source (not an Internet forum or anything like that). Dpbsmith (talk) 20:15, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alex Crockford? 

message: Has it ever been confirmed that Charlie is short for Charles?  I know that Charlie is generally short for Charles, but Arthur and Molly could have just named him Charlie, or even something else. - Charity 04:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. faithless (speak) 20:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles? 

message: This page should also list Charlie as a prefect. He is revealed to be a Prefect in Order of the Phoenix when Molly comments that all of the family except for Fred and George have been prefects.64.50.201.98 18:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prefect 

message: Where is the source for the Prewetts' inclusion on the family tree? As far as I can remember, they are only mentioned in passing in the first and fifth books. Anthrcer 11:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How do we know Molly is descended from the un-named male Prewett rather than Ignatius? AulaTPN 11:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's known because Sirius says that Molly is his cousin by marriage (in OotP).  If Molly's parents were Ignatius and Lucretia (Black) Prewett, then she'd be a blood relative (first cousin).  Lucretia and Orion Black (Sirius' father) were brother and sister. - Seansinc 20:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prewetts

message: Percy should be listed on the family tree as having at least one unknown child. In the end chapter of deathly hallows he is at platform 9 3/4 talking about broom regulations. Government officials, however, never oversaw children getting on the train.  Nor do professors oversee children getting on the train.  Only parents and guardians are present. Therefore Percy must have at least one child.64.50.201.98 18:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's clever of you, I hadn't noticed that.  Still, some will argue that he could have been there to see off his nieces and nephews. Ariadne55 20:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You know he's right, it never says that Percy had children.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.140.57.110 (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

text: This issue has now been answered by JK Rowling, look lower down the page for discussion on it.--71.31.87.173 (talk) 22:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percy's Kids 

message: Isn't including the family tree in individual entries for Weasley family members rather redundant, since the Weasley Family link at the bottom of each page leads to the exact same thing? They also result in unnecessary page clutter. Beemer69 00:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Arthur Weasley is descended from Phineas Nigellus Black.  Phineas also had a daughter named Dorea.  Dorea Black married Charlus Potter and had a son.  It's not known if that son was an ancestor of Harry Potter.  On the tree, there aren't any grandchildren listed for Dorea and Charlus.  Their son was a second-cousin to Arthur Weasley and a second-cousin-once-removed to the Weasley children.  Look for the Black family tree here on Wikipedia, or try www.hp-lexicon.org for their version of it. Ariadne55 04:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family tree in individual entries

message: Is there any source for him being Arthur's father? Od Mishehu 11:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it's a bit complicated. Though it's never exactly stated specifically, you can figure it out logically. We know (because Arthur tells us) that he and Sirius are second cousins once removed. If you consult the Black family tree, the only way this would be possible is if Arthur is the child of Septimus Weasley and Cedrella (Black) Weasley. So aside from this fitting what we know of Arthur's relationship with Sirius, it just makes common sense. It's also worth noting that Cedrella was disowned by the Blacks because Septimus was a blood-traitor. faithless (speak) 12:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Septimus Weasley 

message: This is ridiculous. We need to condense our articles, as per decisions at the WP:WPHP, specifically the ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Harry Potter/Notability. This article (the Grandchilren) is excessive and can easily be merged into this one, Weasley family. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge: the whole article of the grandchildren fits in here, because all of those characters are not notable in the main plot. Lord Opeth 03:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

text: *Merge: Per Lord Opeth and Fbv. —Mirlen 21:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Grandchildren of the Weasley family]] 

message: and some few more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.107.174 (talk) 20:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Harry's other two children are also called James and Lily.  Look up the tree a couple of generations. Vashti 04:44, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  why Albus jn. is linked to Lily and James Potter? 

message: A lot of things that mean a lot in the Harry Potter universe don't have any relevance in real life.  One of the most obvious of these is "blood purity", which is nothing but a proxy adopted by Rowling for bigotry (an analogue for racism, so-called "ethnic cleansing" and the like).  Per WP:WAF, we should of course relate such concepts where they have a real world significance.  But that doesn't mean we stick them in an infobox.
It's especially unseemly when editors enage in personal insults over such matters.
So I've removed the in-universe content from the infoboxes.  Information such as  a character's name, which book or books they appear in, who portrays them on screen, and possibly even their gender (where this is not obvious), probably belong in an infobox (although it's still arguable whether each fictional character merits an infobox).  Matters like "blood purity", however, should be left inside the fictional Harry Potter universe, and should not ever become a cause for argument between Wikipedians. --Tony Sidaway 21:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's actually fine with me. I've never been a big fan of it being included, but as long as it was it might as well be correct. This is a fine compromise, IMO. faithless (speak) 22:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infoboxes and in-universe content

message: I keep on editing the article so it reads Hugo and Rose Granger-Weasley and Victoire Delacour-Weasley. Since their last names are never specified we should use the most neutral ones for them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.78.63 (talk) 22:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we shouldn't, we should go by what is customary; that is, that children are given their father's last name. I have my father's last name, and I'm willing to bet everyone that reads this sentence also has their father's last names. Hyphenated names, though more common than they once were, are still extremely rare. faithless (speak) 22:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, it seems rather arrogant. It feels like Hermione and Fleur believe they are more important that Lily and Molly, whose children took their fathers names. WookMuff 00:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or it could just be the way times change. Either way, this is a dumb argument and completely out of place on wikipedia. The only thing that matters is sources Nil Einne (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Perhaps it would be better to leave no last name at all. True it is likely that they took their father's last name but there is no evidence of that and I'm certain Wikipedia is quite clear that we shouldn't do our own "research" on it. --Silent Elf 00:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Granger/Delacour-Weasley 

message: Spoiler tags are very rarely used on Wikipedia articles.  I've removed those recently added to this article for the following specific reasons.
* All biographical information about a fictional character is derived directly from the plot of the fiction.  It is therefore expected that an article about a fictional character will discuss the plot of that fiction.
* The use of spoiler tags on the article about the last Harry Potter novel, in which the tagged events are described, was discussed extensively and the overall mood was strongly against use of the tags, or anything resembling them such as , beyond the first month or so after publication of the novel in English/
--Tony Sidaway 13:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler tags

message: Anyone think Minor Harry Potter characters is a more appropriate place for her? faithless (speak) 00:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gideon and Fabian are the brothers of someone that married a Weasley. The same applies to Gabrielle. If Muriel, the Prewetts and other Molly's relatives are listed here that are not proper Weasleys, then I see no reason for Gabrielle to be left out. Lord Opeth 00:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gideon and Fabian are only mentioned in the story because they are related to the Weasley family, so this would be the logical place for them. As they died before the series started and play no important part in it, they shouldn't be mentioned in the "minor characters" article, as they're not "really" characters at all, any more than Abraxas Malfoy Marcus Belby's Uncle Damocles are. As for Muriel, she could be a Weasley, we don't know. Molly only refers to her as "our Great Aunt Muriel;" therefore it's unclear if she is a Weasley or a Prewett. Gabrielle is introduced long before she becomes a part of the extended Weasley family, and for nearly the entire series has no relation to the Weasleys. If no one agrees I'm not going to push the matter, but I do feel that the other article would be a more appropriate place. But it's not a big deal. faithless (speak) 01:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gabrielle Delacour 

message: Is Arthur Weasley named after Arthur Wellesley, the war hero Duke of Wellington? Sometimes it is claimed he was named after Wesley, the presbiterian preacher and Arthur, the legendary king of England. Is there any source? 91.83.16.57 (talk) 22:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named after whom? 

message: Why are a lot of Harry potter entries now trailing a paragraph that starts "in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows"  It makes the other books seem a little trivial especially when there is another book before Hallows.  It looks like someone wanted to just tie up all the articles with the spoilers and leave out any developments that happened between the Goblet movie and the Hallows book.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.184.241.144 (talk) 21:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 

message: Wow! The book is so...complete. The ending is a little disappointing but other than that, the Harry Potter series were the best books I've ever read! I'm going to start all over and read the Harry Potter series again. Yaaay! --Daniella95 (talk) 05:16, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Don't Worry, It's Not a Spoiler) 

message: A lot of pages som to say that James and Liyyly, Harry's children, have their middle names named after Sirius Black and Luna Lovgood. If no one can find any proof of this, than it should be deleated. Keyblade Mage (talk) 14:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been going on for months now. I've been pretty good about removing it, but rumor has it that on there is now finally a source for it (the new ITV documentary on Rowling). Until I've seen it, I'm going to take a little hiatus from removing cruft from HP articles. faithless (speak) 15:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but seeing as the person below did mention a documentary, and the comment underneath mentioning a family tree on her website, I would suggest a citation. Unless, of course, you wanted someone else to write it. BlackPearl14Pirate Lord-ess 23:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  James "Sirius" Potter?  Since when! 

message: The source for the newly added info about the Weasley family children is Rowling's own site (to see it, click on the eraser on her desk and then open the door). Unfortunately there is no way to directly link to it. Serendipodous 22:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding the CN tags

message: Why aren't Dominique, Loius, Fred II, and Roxanne listed with small articles under the grandchildren section? Also shouldn't they have redirects to this page?--UESPArules (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grandchildren 

message: Shouldn't the kids also be listed as members of the Potter family? Grsz11 (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry and Ginny 

message: Why not put Angelina Johnson under the extended family section since the only place she is now is at Hogwarts students.--UESPArules (talk) 02:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure we do. faithless (speak) 10:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The actual reason, as far as I recall, is that she, for most or possibly all of her mentions in the books, is a Hogwarts student. -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 10:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We should put her in the "Weasley Family" article instead of "Dumbledore's Army"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.238.174 (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angelina 

message: Why is Muriel's name left off of the  family tree? Could someone try to figure out her connection?
Razor Rozar7 (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't know whether Auntie Muriel is a Weasley or a Prewett, so it would be difficult to include her on the tree. faithless (speak) 20:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. And also, it is not for us to speculate on her connection with the family. --Maurice45 (talk) 20:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Exactly, we don't know whether she's a maternal or paternal aunt to Molly, therefore her inclusion on the family tree would be speculation --Maurice45 (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Auntie Muriel

message: Why is Bill Weasley called William Weasley in the family tree? I know this is obviously an error but I don't know how to fix it myself. --Jammy (talk) 22:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Harry Potter Lexicon lists his name as William. While I can't recall exactly where in the series he is called William (probably by Molly, just in passing), the Lexicon wouldn't list it if it weren't accurate. faithless (speak) 23:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not an error. Deathly Hallows - the wedding scene: "Do you, William Arthur, take Fleur..." -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 00:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Weasley? 

message: can i use the picture of Gabrielle Delacour for the Harry Potter wiki? reply asap Ahoskinson 95 (talk) 22:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  can i use this pic 

message: I am trying to search source 22 to verify the names of the grandchildren, yet I don't see anything on the website about them.  Where do I look?--ZeWrestler  Talk 04:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know, but it's easily verifiable elsewhere on the interweb. I'm sure you could watch the Year in the Life show on YouTube. faithless (speak) 05:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if her website is given as a source, it should be able to be located there.--ZeWrestler  Talk 14:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember saying anything to the contrary. faithless (speak) 17:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, it is only published on the interactive version of her site, and we are unable to link to this. However, when on the homepage, if you click on the eraser on the desk, and then on the door handle once you get to the next room you will be able to see the family tree. -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 04:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternatively, it can be viewed here  -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 04:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification of Grandchildren 

message: Can someone please change "Female Prewett" to Mrs. Prewett as she was not born a Prewett? It might also be more presentable to show Molly's dad as Mr. Prewett --Maurice45 (talk) 17:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch - done. faithless (speak) 22:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Female" Prewett?! 

message: I come with this split proposal after confirming that this article fails to meet some Wiki guidelines. Primarily, the whole article is plot re-telling and in in-universe style; with this I mean that all sections, including the introduction, is about description and plot involvement of characters, places and events. There are no sections of deep analysis or real impact in the outside world of the family as an encyclopedic subject, so it also fails to meet Notability. That is why I think that this article can be split and all sections can be perfectly moved to other existing articles.
To be more specific:
*Arthur, Molly, Bill and Charlie Weasley: move to Order of the Phoenix
*Percy Weasley: move to Ministry of Magic
*Fred and George Weasley: move to Dumbledore's Army
*Fleur Delacour: move to Order of the Phoenix
*Gabrielle Delacour and Auntie Muriel: move to Supporting HP characters
*Others: only Gideon and Fabian Prewett have (little) involvement in the series, and they already have a section in the Order of the Phoenix members table.
*Grandchildren: move to Supporting HP characters
*Residence: move to Places in HP
*Pets and animals: move to the "The Weasleys pets" in the Magical creatures article
*Mr Weasley's car: move to Magical objects
The page itself will be redirected to the "Family's" section in Ron's article, like some of the former articles about families (the Blacks, Riddles, Gaunts, Malfoys, Dumbledores, etc.) Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 04:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. faithless (speak) 04:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it passed more than a week and no opposition came, the changes are being performed.  --LoЯd ۞pεth 23:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal