lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Veda Hlubinka-Cook

message: There's an interesting conflict between naming conventions that I noticed while thinking about this entry.
Robert Cook is the commonly used form of this person's name.
One wikipedia naming convention says to use the middle initial in the article name to disambiguate it from the other Robert Cooks:
: Use common names of persons and things
: Convention: Use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things.
Another convention advises against same, but remains silent on what to do about disambiguation:
: Adding middle names, or their abbreviations, merely for disambiguation purposes (that is: if this format of the name is not the commonly used one to refer to this person): not advised.
What's an editor to do? Should this article be: "Robert A. Cook," "Robert Cook" (clearly not, if there's already an entry there), or "Robert Cook (Software Developer)"? --Zippy 22:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think I answered my own question. As there's no entry for "Robert Cook" already, I'm renaming this to "Robert Cook". We'll have to deal with disambiguation when the next Robert Cook comes along. --Zippy 22:56, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Headline text

message: The entry says Cook was born in 1964 and cites a seemingly unreliable internet source while the persons own LinkedIn says she graduated from Yale in 1993. Given the info on the LinkedIn profile, it seems that the birth year in the entry is incorrect. I'm guessing it is 1970 or 1971, but I can't find a more accurate source.
Kiboko83 (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthday problem
Talk:Querétaro

message: I live in Querétaro and I have never seen any "official" flag of the State. What is the source of this flag? Pablo 08:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag 

message: Should this article have a flag inside the infobox? There is a discussion about it at WikiProject Mexico, where you can join and discuss it. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox flag RFC
Talk:S. Scott Bullock

message: Per the discussion at the Help Desk:
:As such, we should be very careful about publishing his birthdate for privacy concerns.  In fact, birthdates are specifically called out in WP:BLP#Presumption in favor of privacy.  The IP editor both times only edited this article and only to do the same action (remove the birthdate).  I can not ignore the fact that this pattern suggests we are gearing up for a WP:DOLT scenario where those IPs are, in fact, S. Scott Bullock himself removing his own birthdate.  I, of course, can't prove that.  I only have an editing pattern which supports this conclusion.  So, it comes to a balance of needs here -- Is providing this information weighed more than the privacy concerns laid out in WP:BLP?   Without evidence that this information is already widespread (outside of IMDb), I have to lean in favor of privacy for this living person.  As such, I'm removing the birthdate myself until multiple reliable sources showing this information is already widespread is presented, per WP:BLP.  -- ShinmaWa(talk) 03:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate
Talk:Hasta (spear)

message: ??? "Hasta" = "spear"??? this is a bad translation, hasta doesnt mean at all spear, at least in spain, the word "asta" is used to reffer a flag stick, not either an spear that in spanish is "Lanza". My english is not as good as i need to translate the word "Hasta" but ill try:
Iremos hasta donde necesitemos = We will go (where)as long as we need
:The very first words of the article are "Hasta is a Latin word meaning spear". Spear is a very good translation. Many words mean quite different things in other languages and there is nothing special about Spanish: hasta is also Sanskrit word meaning hand. The article title is quite clear that the Hasta in question is a spear; the body of the article is quite clear that this is about the specific type of spear carried by Roman soldiers. Did you, perhaps, come to this article via an inappropriate link? If so, please fix it. There is a disambiguation page for Hasta that might be of assistance. Gaius Cornelius 07:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hasta doesn't mean spear

message: i think that hasta pura should link to this page, but im not sure how to do that yet. i dont see why not because it is mentioned on this page.
Sniper201092 (talk) 01:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created a redirect for Hasta pura. To see what a redirect looks like, see here. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hasta Pura

message: The Symbolic Usage section of the article makes very little sense. Somebody really needs to improve the grammar for that section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.9.144.156 (talk) 12:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Symbolic Usage
Talk:Dragonology

message: This page didn't cover cryptozoology, Magic is explictally not cryptozoology. I've merged to to a section on Dragon, and substantially rewritten. Zeimusu | Talk page 15:28, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: All of the information on this page related to the book series titled "Dragonology", edited by Dugald A. Steer, starting with the first book in 2003.  I have thus added in information regarding the books and referencing them and the website.  Sources had been given earlier, but were removed for some reason.  199.174.215.49 22:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I don't think stats should be on this page. Wikipedia is not dragonology class. --Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 00:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some stats may be permissible, as it gives a short summary and more detail to the article. --Sapphire Dragon777 (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats 

message: I think you should add excerpts of dragons to make the page not seem as short as it is.
--Pumagirl7 (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added an excerpt as requested. --Sapphire Dragon777 (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dragons 

message: I think someone should list the species of dragon with a link to there respective Wikipedia pages. I cannot find this information anywhere and require it for one of my internet projects.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.110.198 (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a list of the species of dragons as an excerpt. Hope this helps. --Sapphire Dragon777 (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List 

message: Does anyone have any knowledge concerning the Dragonology video game that supposedly came out?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.45.24 (talk) 20:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Game 

message: Why is there a no in front of the list of merchandise and many of its items?
No Sets, Games, and Toys
No Dragonology: The Board Game
No Dragonology: Hatch (cards)
No Series 1 Dragon Toys
No Series 2 Dragon Toys
No Miniature Dragon Toys
Brackattax (talk) 12:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'No'? 
Talk:National Association of W Lovers

message: This page should not be deleted, as the Association is an important aspect of Bert's character and the Sesame Street TV show.  And besides, I am a member of the club myself. --User:Terry Longbaugh 
:That would support a merge into Bert more than it would a keep. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hypoplastic left heart syndrome

message: This is a pretty good article on HLHS, thanks.
-  invalidname
This page needs to be edited as it has been copied word for word from the American Heart Association's article on it here:
http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=1353
:That isn't true now. 75.41.110.200 (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should be supplemented to mention electromechanical assists.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.41.110.200 (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022816 JFW | T@lk 21:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current therapy 

message: Baby Fae had HLHS (her doctor died today which is how I ended up here). Worth mentioning in this article? I can't figure out a way to do it other than a See Also section. CSZero (talk) 22:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby Fae 

message: - Update Epidemiology section based on more recent metanalysis (PMID: 30783674)
- Create a section regarding potential future stem cell therapies based on systematic reviews (PMID: 31705822)
- Add to prognosis section about the motor developmental delay after cardiac surgery based on a recent meta-analysis (PMID: 34618742)ChrisHurtado7129 (talk) 17:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject: UCF 4th Year Medical Student Planning to Edit 

message: Good work Chris, a few suggestions you might consider as we complete our development of these articles:  
* When discussing the male predominance in epidemiology, consider rewording "thought to be" to "has been demonstrated/shown in population-based studies". This appears to be more definitive of the true distribution shown through clinical evaluation. 
* Rather than citing UptoDate, you may consider the article cited on the UptoDate page (PMID: 19909991). This is an open access article that the layperson could access without having to utilize an UptoDate login
* Signs and Symptoms: when discussing early symptoms, I would rephrase "Early symptoms might include poor feeding or cyanosis that does not respond to oxygen administration". This is more of a syntax edit that clarifies that the cyanosis is independent of poor feeding. 
* Consider combining the last two sentences of "Pathogenesis > Altered Blood Flow" In some cases of aortic stenosis that occur in fetal development, there is added stress on the left ventricle in utero.  This can eventually lead to decreased perfusion and stop the growth of the left ventricle.[14].
* I did not see any inclusion of the future of stem cell therapies that you mentioned in your plan to edit
* When introducing the motor delay in the prognosis section, there is a typo in the word "Additionally". 
* Other developmental delays are introduced in the first paragraph in "Prognosis", you may further develop these if you can find adequate resources to build on those complications. 
Happy to offer further assistance as we continue to build these topics. 
Kjlockart (talk) 23:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject: UCF 4th Year Medical Student Peer Review
Talk:Warm Springs, Nevada

message: Can we cite a source for the new development in Warm Springs.  And I'd really curious to know why 10,000 people are going to move there - that's nearly four times the population of Tonopah, and it's difficult to figure out what they'd all do for a living. -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 23:44, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to follow up on a 15 year old talk page item, I believe that the Warm Springs in question is the valley north of Spanish Springs in Washoe County, see .  I found no evidence of a plan to move 10,000 people to Warm Springs, Nye County.  Cxbrx (talk) 20:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New development
Talk:The King of the Golden River

message: This is a delightful story, and so helpful in teaching morals to children the fun way.
--drboisclair 23:52, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: South West Wind, Esq. left the roof on over Gluck's room but blew it off Hans and Schwartz's room. The floodwaters that came as a result of the inundation accompanying SWW,esq.'s attack washed all away and left the red sand, which was a consequence of the inundation. I am surprized that there is such a difference! The work was composed in English, so there should be no variance. Perhaps the Wikisource text needs to be emended.--Drboisclair (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I'm very curious: what is the difference you have found between your version of the story and the one in Wikisource because the two editions I have confirm what is in Wikisource?--Drboisclair (talk) 17:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitiled

message: It may be of some interest that Carl Barks made Ruskin's story the basis and centerpiece of his 1958 comic book tale Uncle Scrooge and the Golden River. There also exists a parody of the story also starring Donald Duck, published in 1961 in Italy, written by Guido Martina; it has recently seen its first printing in the universe by Fantagraphics. Where in the article would it be appropriate to mention these facts, and with what sort of sources? Scrooge MacDuck (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: References in Disney Comics
Talk:Isometric exercise

message: — Assignment last updated by DiceyDomino (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English Composition 1102
Talk:Jamaica Labour Party

message: hear is some evidence
What is the official ideology of the JLP?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.115.85.176 (talk) 06:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Various haphazard comments and links

message: Please provide a specific link form a reliable source, such as a mainstream newspaper or the Oficial JLP site, to show that the JLP's political beleifs are Social democracy. Readers and editors should not have to hunt fron the main JLP home page, which has no info at all, or from the maze of links above that only have one signature. Also, please give other editors time to verify these clamis BEFORE trying to add such info again. Thanks for your consideration of others. - BillCJ (talk) 06:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Social democracy

message: "The Republican Party (in the United States) is in support of the JLP"
Uncited in lead and unmentioned in body. What is this supposed to mean? 216.174.90.24 (talk) 18:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  sentence in lead
Talk:Heron (disambiguation)

message: How on earth can this page not link to the bird (or sub-species) heron? Is there no article? - Anon
Removed 'heroin', probably vandalism. The way, the truth, and the light 07:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

message: If this guy is called "Hero", why is the article on the disambiguation page for "Heron"? Huey45 10:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hero of Alexandria
Talk:Eva Kwok

message: This article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. For details, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva L. Kwok.  BD2412 talk 00:06, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD results
Talk:Siege of Turin

message: This is part of series of updates for major battles in this theatre, so I've made it consistent, added references etc.
Robinvp11 (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Hi. Nice article. A couple of comments.
*The cite and the source for Duffy have different dates. (And I can't, personally, track either of them to an edition of the book in question.)
*Somerset is cited but is not in the list of sources.
Gog the Mild (talk) 23:11, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted, tx Robinvp11 (talk) 14:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation queries
Talk:Totalitarian dictators

message: Political theorists like Arendt defined totalitarianism as society in which there is no intervening authority between the state and the citizen, where the state is guided by an elaborate all-encompassing ideology that promises a reachable utopia. Over the years definitions and categorization schemes have varied. Yet what we have here-- "dictators... qualify based on repression of emigration"/"dictators... qualify based on murders of innocent civilians or political opponents"-- ignores these definitions... Apparently it's based on the "original research" of Silverback, not any of the leading poilitical theorists on the subject like Arendt, Popper, Brzezinski, and Kirkpatrick. 172 | Talk 00:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Messines (1917)

message: Greetings, thanks for adding the Sanitatsbericht data. Does 26,087 relate to 7 June or a longer period? Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 08:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The data refers to the entire battle, until 14 June. --Mosbatho (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 19:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties 

message: Your edit is pure journalistic rhodomontade and has been dropped into the article with no reference to what's already there, cited to a newspaper reporter, this really isn't wiki. Please don't revert my revert without discussing it here. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 14:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he meant "rodomantade" 50.111.18.219 (talk) 12:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the English spelling. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit
Talk:Penaeus monodon

message: Pictures, please? -Iopq 00:23, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I direct editors to the above news article from The Guardian for possible inclusion in this Wikipedia article. --86.8.253.190 (talk) 23:11, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2003/jun/19/food.fishing "Is it OK to eat tiger prawns?"] 

message: Should this article be moved to Giant tiger prawn or Asian tiger shrimp to better comply with WP:COMMONNAME? --Bensin (talk) 13:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should article be moved? 

message: Good solid start to your article. Would like to see more information about the reproductive strategies if possible. Really interesting addition of information about the presence in aquaculture and Greenpeace.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brivel9501 (talk • contribs) 03:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bleu's Peer Review  

message: Good lead.
Description section is good.  
On distribution section,I would start your sentence with the species name again, not "its" so that if someone skips directly to that section they know exactly what the subject of the sentence is. 
In the sustainable consumption section try to paraphrase what Greenpeace says instead of using direct quotes.
Might want to try and find a few journal articles for sources to strengthen your reference section.
Lauren ku (talk) 03:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:MARPOL 73/78

message: I need to research MARPOL Annex VI, amendments, and the U.S. enabling legislation (for a journal article). In the brief Wikipedia article there's a link under "Amendments" that's broken. "MEPC 176(58)" appears to be a link, but it just returns "HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.58.148.207 (talk) 18:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  MARPOL_73/78 Annex VI amendments link is broken 
Talk:Richard A. White

message: The article seems to be somewhat invasive in that it displays White's salary, which if it were for a lower-ranking official might be considered a privacy violation. Also, I think that White left WMATA voluntarily.
69.140.157.138
:Salary information for public officials is considered public information, and thus there's no invasion of privacy by including it in the article. Additionally, this article from the Washington Post confirms that White was dismissed from Metro. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While the facts may be correct, the overall slant of the article is to portray the subject in a somewhat negative light. 68.50.203.109 18:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you provide examples of the negative "slant" in the article? I read over the whole thing, and it sounds neutral to me. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no response, I've removed the tag. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did Mr. White have any substantial accomplishments as general manager of Metro? From reading the article, it would appear the answer is "no." It is unclear whether that is because of a negative slant of the article, or whether Mr. White truly failed as General Manager. 69.140.173.15 01:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:A549 cell

message: A549 cells share the same characteristics with the alveolar type II cells. This are type II pneumocytes crucial for lung homeostasis, and regeneration upon damage. For research purposes to unravel different molecular mechanisms leading to lung diseases, A549 cells serves as a good model to which translational research can be relied upon. Among other characteristics is their ability to secret phospholipids and also the surfactant proteins.
They could be squamous but there is a lot of debate going on as they should be cuboidal...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.118.110.19 (talk) 17:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From the article: "The human alveolar epithelial cell line A549 may be anchored or suspended in a solution in vitro."
So is this cell line adherent or suspension? Of course, any adherent cell line can be put into suspension, but under normal growth conditions, a cell line is one or the other.  ATCC says adherent:   142.103.207.10 (talk) 22:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adherent or suspension? 

message: This is a good start, but I think it would be super helpful if information such as cell characteristics and types of experiments/uses it has. The information above is a great place to start. It would also be a really good idea to link this page to the Immortalised Cell Line wiki page so readers can get a better understanding of what kind of cell this is.180Degrees (talk) 02:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Suggestions 

message: I believe Adenovirus 5 is integrated, but I am not sure. I came to wikipedia to find out which adenovirus is integrated. Would it be possible to add this information specifically to the article? 2A02:8388:1641:5500:8207:8CE:DF2:AB90 (talk) 08:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adenovirus
Talk:Cultural references to Leonardo da Vinci

message: Please see this.  Tomertalk 03:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to related discussion? 

message: Captain Janeway uses Leonardo's laboratory (recreated in the holodeck) as a spiritual refuge, and commonly spoke with Leonardo. In the program, she was essentially one of his students. Later in either that episode or that season (I forget which) the Leonardo hologram ends up being shunted into the EMH's mobile emitter, and is then stolen. You get to see Leonardo make all kinds of neat things with alien materials, and indeed, fly like the birds. The guy that played him did a great job. Whether or not it's historically accurate is up for debate, but it's still worth mentioning. Worth watching too. - NemFX 06:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek: Voyager 

message: The link to the episode is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concerning_Flight
However, I've compiled a brief list of Da Vinci specific things here: http://www.deviantart.com/download/68193920/Concerning_flight_by_NemFX.rtf
NemFX 16:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek Voyager 
Talk:Crichton Park, Nova Scotia

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 01:04, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate