lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Principality of Hutt River

message: Melba1 (talk) 07:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Nations people win native title to an area including Hutt River. 

message: On 8 August 2020, Channel 9 "60 Minutes" had a story by reporter ("Sir") Brady Halls in which "Prince" Leonard Casley showed on a wall of the reception area not only that letter from the Palace but also annual letters from the Australian Taxation Office, starting in 1996.  That for the tax year ending 30 June 2005 states:  "Your taxable income is nil" and "You have been deemed to be a non-resident of Australia for income tax purposesno tax-free threshold is available to non-residents." Errantius (talk) 10:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  #Status - Australian Taxation Office 

message: Why are the predecessor and successor countries in the infobox the State of Western Australia? Should they not be a sovereign state (ie, Australia)? Arecaceæ2011 (talk) 03:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Since, to the extent that it can be said to have existed at all, it was putatively sovereign, not a putatively a part of Australia separate from Western Australia. Its predecessor and successor are the soverign nation that now control the territory. I've changed it. Largoplazo (talk) 02:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predecessor and Successor in Infobox 

message: Arthur Casley is mentioned two times in the article, but there's no indication of who he is. Oooooooseven (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. I've noted that he's Leonard's son and footnoted it. Largoplazo (talk) 01:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Arthur Casley?
Talk:List of LGBT-related films

message: Sorry, My name is Miguel and I need use de Translate (My English is painful, I know).
Hi. In your list on LGBT cinema, I don't think you have included a film that, not only me, but IMDB itself, qualifies within a clear bisexual subtext: 
Wings, 1927, by William A. Wellman, Harry d'Abbadie d'Arrast ( uncredited). 
IMDB, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0018578/?ref_=nm_flmg_dr_70
I think it has more merits than others on the list to be on it.
I have seen the movie and there are scenes that go beyond romance, not ambiguous looks, and shows an affection between men more than buried. In case you want to consider it.
Miguel Vega90.166.50.232 (talk) 08:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film: Wings 1927 

message: This list is in need of reliable sources for the films that don't have Wikipedia articles about them. Where is the proof that they involve "", as claimed in the lead?  WP:RS states: "The verifiability policy is strictly applied to all material in the mainspace—articles, lists, and sections of articles—without exception...."
WP:SOURCELIST states: "Lists, whether they are stand-alone lists (also called list articles) or embedded lists, are encyclopedic content just as paragraph-only articles or sections are. Therefore, all individual items on the list must follow Wikipedia's content policies: the core content policies of Verifiability (through good sources in the item's one or more references), No original research, and Neutral point of view, plus the other content policies as well." Pyxis Solitary  (yak yak). Ol' homo. 04:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for films that do not have a Wikipedia article
Talk:Samuel Morse

message: See Talk:Marston Morse#Samuel Morse: 5th or 6th cousin twice removed?.
Thatsme314 (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please say either 5th or 6th, not both? Trump2024KState (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marston Morse: 5th or 6th cousin twice removed? 

message: Trump2024KState (talk) 17:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2024 at 12:12 

message: Chris is a former coach of the Kansas State and Butler universities from 1996 to 2023, before stepping down in November of 2023. Trump2024KState (talk) 17:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What does this have to do with the inventor of the telegraph? PianoDan (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Mullinix
Talk:Karl Dönitz

message: To the IP who's edit warring in a claim that Dönitz's appointment as German leader by Hitler was illegal, please provide secondary sources that support this. Citing only/mainly German legislation violates Wikipedia's rules against original research. There should be books or similar that establish this if it's actually the case. Nick-D (talk) 09:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary sources
Talk:Irish 'Pro-Life Amendment'

message: I'm at a bit of a loss as to what to call this page. 'Pro-Life Amendment' sounds as though I am endorsing a 'pro-life' analysis. I am absolutely refusing to take sides  on the abortion debate here. But 'Abortion Amendment' is a name that has never been used by any side in the argument. so-called 'Pro-Life Amendment sounds as though I am questioning the title, which again is POV. The official name was the '8th Amendment to the Constitution Act' but that's a mouthful that few use, even fewer would recognise and I'm sure other states have '8th Amendments' too. 
The term 'Pro-Life Amendment' is the most widely used name, even if used sarcastically by 'pro-choice' campaigners, as when judicially reviewed, the Amendment was judged to allow abortion in judicially defined areas, an irony they milked with pleasure. As 'Pro-Life Amendment' is the one term that all sides would intinctively recognise (even if everyone mightn't agree with the title), and as a result they know exactly what this page is referring to, it is the only option I can come up with. 
So sorry, if anyone has hit the roof over the title and think it is POV, there ain't another short title that would immediately be recognised as referring to the 1983 amendment that I can find. I've even asked friends on both sides of the argument can they come up with something else, and they can't. JTD 03:09 Jan 6, 2003 (UTC)
I'm working on merging this with the article Eighth_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_Ireland Nik42 03:38, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ijtihad

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Ijtihad per consensus. While the term "Ijtihad" is not widely known among the general public, there is broad agreement that it is common enough in academic discourse, and that the current descriptive title is unnecessary in face of reasonably established common name. Besides, Arabic terms already dominate in :Category:Islamic terminology so this move would affirm consistency.I will also WP:BOLDly move Consensus in Islamic law to Ijma per Walrasiad's suggestion.  No such user (talk) 12:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Independent legal reasoning in Islamic law →  – Ijtihad absolutely dwarves the use of the convoluted term "Independent legal reasoning" in English-language scholarly literature about the subject. "Indendent legal reasoning" + "Islam" gets about 700 Google Scholar hits; ijtihad gets 41,000. Almost all the terms in Islam on the periphery of ijtihad are already named in naturalised phonetic English, such as taqlid, jihad, etc. Ijtihad is a big enough concept in Islam to be treated in the same manner, just as it is in scholarly sources. Even independent of this, there would be a case for the change based on pure consistency, as ijitihad also blows away terms like taqlid in terms of usage. See taqlid on Google Scholar (just over a third the ijtihad tally) and Ngram. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: But why would we use a descriptive title for something that has a name? Srnec (talk) 00:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that name doesn't exist in English? If there's a word in German ("Restorisvampenfloridangattor"?) for the Restoration of the Everglades, whoopdi-doo, that's great for de.wikipedia, but our titles need to be in English. The supporters of this move, to me, need to convincingly prove that this concept is commonly referred to in English as "ijtihad". Red Slash 18:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Red Slash: You don't find those 41,000 Google Scholar hits compelling? 'Independent legal reasoning' is not a descriptive title, it is a less common, literal translation, and those exact words ARE used, in the 700 Google Scholar hits I provided, normally presented as a translation of 'ijtihad'. Opposers of this move need to show how 'independent legal reasoning' is common. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Firstly, those Google Scholar numbers are ghost-hits, i.e. those references don't exist.  Scanning to the end of your search, it only reaches around 1,000.  Secondly, the majority of those articles are non-English (most are in Indonesian and Malay, as far as I can tell). Thirdly, Wikipedia articles are written for the general public, not scholars. Walrasiad (talk) 03:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 March 2022
Talk:Consensus decision-making

message: The heading "Blocking" explains pretty much every step in the flow-chart *other than* blocking, although it dances around what blocking is by describing various ways to avoid it. Should the heading be changed? Or should the bulleted list be expanded to describe the blocking action in the flowchart? 2620:15C:2D3:205:A6D6:D3D0:9CE2:2EE6 (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Blocking" section doesn't describe blocking 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 16:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Consensus decision-making →  – Given that Consensus already redirects here, and that Consensus (disambiguation) exists, I would like to seek "consensus" on whether we should move the article on Consensus decision-making to Consensus (sorry for all the puns). I'm convinced that consensus is a more WP:CONCISE title while making minimal noticeable sacrifices to WP:PRECISE. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 16:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 September 2023 

message: I just stumbled upon an interesting reference to this article. In 2018, the creator and "Benevolent Dictator for Life" of Python (computer language), Guido van Rossum, retired. Later that year, the community gathered to vote on a new governance system. In Python Enhancement Proposal 8001, they choice to use the Condorcet method with one of three points of reasoning being "2. It is consensus decision-making", linking to this article. However, the #Condorcet_Consensus section no longer exists on this article, nor any reference to Condorcet!
I just wanted to share this, motivates me to improve this article further, and hopefully others. DougInAMugtalk 12:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article influenced how the governance system of Python was decided - wrongly?
Talk:Lilian, Princess of Réthy

message: What was the first name of Cardinal Van Roey? -- Zoe
She was never queen-consort, only princess-consort, shouldn't the name of the article be therefore different? like, Lilian, Princess of Rethy or something like that? see Albert, Prince Consort. Gryffindor 15:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: She was, however, the consort to a king regardless of her title. It's an exception to the rule I'd say, but I would support renaming the article to Lilian, princesse de Réthy or Lilian, Princess of Réthy as she held that title as her own, regardless of its technical legality. Charles 17:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not only does this article take a peacock tone toward its subject while completely lacking inline citations, but it asserts a narrative (The Queen Mother's role in the romance, the rationale for the alleged religious ceremony and for the (illegally) subsequent civil marriage, the reasons Lilian did not bear the title of queen, etc) that is nether proven nor agreed upon. Worse it asserts as fact that opposition to the marriage, and its importance to the Question royale later, resulted from the machinations of Leopold III's political enemies rather than from the immediate, widespread view of many Belgians that the marriage was simply inappropriate. Lethiere (talk) 02:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbalanced & disputed content 

message: Wait she "declined" to be Queen? So she had a say in what title she was going to recieve? This doesn't sound right to me since her descendants were going to be excluded from the throne. Wasn't she just a morganatic spouse rather than a women who declined to be Queen, which sounds more like the future Camilla in the UK.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 05:47, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen
Talk:Sam & Dave

message: Is the one on the left Sam, and the one on the right Dave? If so, the caption should say so. 47.17.119.204 (talk) 23:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, done.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Asia

message: Some sources (Operation World) put Islam as the largest Asian religion at 26.4% Is there a reason why your source is undercounting or not including the Middle East?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.11.224.92 (talk) 10:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Islam

message: I feel like the first sentence of the lead is a bit clunky. I propose it should be changed from this:
Asia (/ˈeɪʒə/ (listen), also UK: /ˈeɪʃə/) is a continent  which is part of Eurasia. 
to this:
Asia (/ˈeɪʒə/ (listen), also UK: /ˈeɪʃə/) is a continent  which, along with Europe, makes up the landmass Eurasia.
Thoughts? 216.207.176.186 (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead first sentence 

message: The map for Asia by the UNSD is incorrect. Iran is under South Asia, not west Asia. See reference. 
https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/ Ricemaster12 (talk) 01:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  *UNSD Map incorrect  

message: Abkhazia and South Ossetia are not independent contries. They are breakaway regions of the Republic of Georgia. Abkhazia and South Ossetia are Georgia!!! 185.70.54.84 (talk) 10:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in the listing of countries 

message: Ahoj ja som denis mam velky kaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.217.32.82 (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 February 2024 

message: Hello, I personally think an image of the unofficial flag of Asia  should added to the template content 
Here is the flag:-
:File:Flag of Asia.png BuddyHeigh (talk) 17:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you really feel that there is value in presenting the independent work of one "Zrcook610" as if it were one of the most basic pieces of information one could know about an entire continent of 4 billion people? Remsense诉 18:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

text: Well the thing about unofficial flags is, they're unofficial. They are just things someone made up and have no standing whatsoever. Canterbury Tail talk 21:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag
Talk:Liber Memorialis

message: An enjoyable little book giving a fascinating insight into the syllabus for a young Roman aristocrat and the Romans' view of the world and themselves.  Much more should be made of this work - students of Latin could use it just as Eutropius is given for translation out of Latin.
----
Some help and detail on post-1911 edition or editions would be welcome; apparently there was a German edition in 1935:
:AßMANN, E., ed., Lucii Ampelii Liber memorialis. Lipsiae 1935 ; Stutgardiae 1972. (Bibliotheca Teubneriana.) 
(the above listing is from www.forumromanum.org/literature/justin/bibliographie.html)
 --Gary D 09:17, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the requested information on modern editions.  Wareh 19:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Wave equation

message: The current lede starts:
* The (two-way) wave equation is a second-order linear partial differential equation for the description of waves or standing wave fields – as they occur in classical physics – such as...
This is a definition of the topic of the article, but the subject "wave equation" would be correctly divided in to "classical wave equation" and "quantum wave equation".  I will write a new first sentence that omits the classical and add a sentence explaining the limits placed in this article. Johnjbarton (talk) 06:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't. I think the quantum wave equation is covered in Wave Function.  Gpsanimator (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wave function is not an equation, it is a solution to an equation. Johnjbarton (talk) 23:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "wave equation" is not classical
Talk:Bokmål

message: As you can see, I have merged the text from the Riksmål and Dano-Norwegian articles into the Bokmål article and redirected those articles here. I figured it was easier to just show how it could be done than to ask for your opinions beforehand. Now that you can see the result, your opinions are greatly appreciated.
Plutix 21:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this was an improvement. Well done!Inge 11:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Redundancy should be solved using links. To redirect to "Bokmål" from "Riksmål" is bound to cause confusion. Someone searching for "Riksmål" may, upon being redirected, assume they are the same thing (which is a common misunderstanding). --84.211.138.201 (talk) 05:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged Bokmål/Riksmål/Dano-Norwegian 

message: Or don't you think? bord is not mentioned, but only given IPA pronunciation from which the word may be guessed! Same with banan. I did not make any changes, because I too do not yet know where to place this best, but it's really mandatory to put the actual words in, not only their pronunciation. -andy 77.7.15.196 (talk) 16:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table needs an overhaul! 

message: The title of that section should maybe be changed. How about Riksmål? --Normash (talk) 09:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bokmål vs. Riksmål" 

message: I don't feel is a Norwegianised variety of the Danish language is accurate—it implies the language is still Danish, and maybe even that Bokmål aims to be Danish. I think something like derives from 19th-century written Danish, made progressively more Norwegian over many decades would be better. Musiconeologist (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The examples in a typical  NAOB entry give an idea of how much it's changed. Musiconeologist (talk) 18:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Is a . . . variety of . . . Danish"
Talk:Shame/Archive 1

message: The introductory paragraph concludes with "Intense shame may lead to depression or suicide." Can anyone please provide valid, scientific data to support this statement?
:Can you provide valid, scientific data that Shame exists? All we have is the account of a few billion human beings - all of whom could be lying, for all we know. Not very scientific at all!
Supporting Data can be found in the following article:
Suicide and Shameby
HARTMUT B. MOKROS
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 38, No. 8, 1091-1103 (1995) 
Deepsoulstarfish 18:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Supporting Data. 

message: I tried to tighten this up with references.  However, there seem to be few good general references on this topic.  Please comment or suggest how to proceed and how to organize\clean up the remainder of the article.
Anacapa 02:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction/definition/distinctions

message: I think the work of TJ Scheff (Professor Emeritus of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara) should be mentioned in this article. He is a major influence on John Bradshaw, and he is a leading academic researcher into Shame as an emotion, and its role in in social processes. Google him and you will find relevant articles.
Just claiming this now that I know how to sign: Deepsoulstarfish 02:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work of Thomas Scheff 

message: Why does Shame (song) redirect to here? Xiner (talk, email) 16:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Is a .gif of a hands doing the two finger tsk tsk shaming motion. --NEMT 02:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What this article needs

message: I've added the picture.  Please comment.  By all means remove it if you think it's bad. --Simon Speed 17:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Encapuchado Rosa.jpg]]
Talk:Alexander Graham Bell

message: Alexander Graham Bell (/ˈɡreɪ.əm/, born Alexander Bell; March 3, 1847 – August 2, 1922) was a Scottish-born Canadian-American inventor, scientist and engineer who is credited with patenting the first practical telephone. He also co-founded the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) in 1885 79.139.168.230 (talk) 08:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexander Graham Bell (/ˈɡreɪ.əm/, born Alexander Bell; March 3, 1847 – August 2, 1922)[4] was a Scottish-born[N 1] Canadian-American inventor, scientist and engineer who is credited with patenting the first practical telephone. He also co-founded the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) in 1885
Talk:Quercus montana

message: Where does this wood fall on the Janka Hardness Scale? I also suggest differentiating from American Chestnut, too. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 01:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardness? 
Talk:Alphonse Daudet

message: I was a bit shocked at the state of this article when I dropped by looking for basic info on the man. Quite a bit of the text I had to remove because of irreparable WP:OR and WP:ESSAY, weasel words and opinion. What remains lacks both personal and literary info and what there is lacks citations and refs for many of the assertions and analysis. Worse still it is missing literary criticism especially re. comparisons to Charles Dickens and description/discussion of his contemporary popular acclaim/success compared with any subsequent examination. 
It also appears to  have been a bit too carelessly translated from French in many places so I cleaned up the grammar and re-wrote a few lines where I could. 
The article really does need taking in hand entirely by an expert. So I've templated it and now will do my best to find such  a one in a project or somewhere. Wish me luck! Plutonium27 (talk) 21:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rough and ready mini-clean up done 

message: I greet you all ;!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.159.220.162 (talk) 03:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salutation 

message: Gyoou 2409:4089:119E:FCCF:0:0:18EC:D8A4 (talk) 17:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: From: The Topeka state journal (Topeka, Kan.), March 3, 1900 - Page 6 - From the Library of Congress full newspaper images archive
"SAPHO" DEALER JAILED.
Book Dealer in Philadelphia Is Given a Year in the County Prison.
Philadelphia, Pa., March 3. "Sapho," Daudet's novel, was today adjudged an immoral publication by a jury in the quarter sessions court and was instrumental in consigning Frederick Kohler, a local dealer in books and stationery, to the county prison for one year. Lieut. O'Brien, in citizen's cl ithing, purchased a copy of "Sapho" from Kohler. After the lieutenant had examined the book he had a warrant issued for Kohler's arrest. The case was tried today before Judge Finletter, the oldest jurist on the local bench. The jury retired. For more than an hour the jurors investigated the exhibits and then agreed on the verdict. 2600:1700:D591:5F10:4C60:7BA2:B2C9:67D9 (talk) 16:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sappho" novel found indecent and bookseller jailed for 1 year