lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Western Bloc

message: In the map on this page, several countries are marked as "neutral".
In the article on neutrality, it's correctly and clearly stated that neutrality is referring to wars. Is it then appropriate, according to Wikipedia consensus, to consider the Cold War as a war in this respect? Can it then be shown which countries were, de facto or de jure, neutral during the Cold War?
/Johan M. Olofsson (talk) 18:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of "neutral" 

message: The legend for the "Political situation..." map cites France as a "Neutral country, Western-aligned". Color: light blue. But the color on the map graphic (dark blue) identifies it as a "Western-aligned country".  Which was intended?
Rcrowley7 (talk) 19:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Ambiguity 

message: Why is Angola, Namibia, Mozambique and Zimbabwe added as first world led by US when these countries were still under occupation by either the Portuguese or the Apartheid SA gvt? Nlivataye (talk) 10:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a joke? 

message: Dear IP,
please gain consensus for this in the talk, thank you!(KIENGIR (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP edit 

message: Finland has been ratified and will join NATO April 2023. Finland to formally join NATO with days. Sweden is expected to join July or later 2023.  Sweden-NATO relations  They also regularly do military exercises with NATO countries. Many "Other" countries also do military exercises with NATO.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firejack007 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finland, Sweden 

message: After the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, Pahlavi aligned Iran with the Western Bloc and cultivated a close relationship with the United States to consolidate his power as an authoritarian ruler. Relying heavily on American support amidst the Cold War, he remained the Shah of Iran for 26 years after the coup, effectively keeping the country from swaying towards the influence of the Eastern Bloc and the Soviet Union.[6][7] Beginning in 1963, Pahlavi implemented a number of reforms aimed at modernizing Iranian society, in 37.131.111.160 (talk) 09:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  d. Head of Revolutionary Council. 

message: The Shah's regime was seen as an oppressive, brutal,[35][36] corrupt, and lavish regime by some of the society's classes at that time.[35][37] It also suffered from some basic functional failures that brought economic bottlenecks, shortages, and inflation.[38] The Shah was perceived by many as beholden to—if not a puppet of—a non-Muslim Western power (i.e., the United States)[39][40] whose culture was affecting that of Iran. At the same time, support for the Shah may have waned among Western politicians and media— 37.131.111.160 (talk) 09:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:                   �. Other shortcomings of the previous regime.
Talk:Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation, and Arms Control Center

message: The link to the Director of WINPAC (US Govt agency), Alan Filey, takes one to the "Cork City Ballet" & it's esteemed boss.
I'm not sure they're the same person... 77.98.102.41 (talk) 10:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alan Foley
Talk:Z-Division

message: Z-Division seems to be very well documented. Here are some decent references I've found so far.
* http://www.sandia.gov/recordsmgmt/zdiv.html
* http://www.harvardir.org/articles/1064/2/
* https://www.llnl.gov/str/JulAug02/JulAug50th.html
* http://www.osti.gov/accomplishments/pdf/DE00801539/038.pdf
I'll try to add one or two of these to the article, when I've finished sorting out a lack of references for Cambodia's biodiversity. :) Paxse (talk) 09:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! Cheers, Paxse (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for Expansion 

message: I was reading this doc and found a ref to the z division,
Z-Division, believe it or not, originated in Roswell, New Mexico. I guess the reason is, that is where the original nuclear bomb armada was formed - the first bomber wing that carried the nuclear bomb - and it migrated over to Kirtland Air Force Base during the time period when Orlando Lawrence, the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories fellow, was called in.
see :http://www.subversiveelement.com/Roswell_Reverse_Engineering_Shul.html
and http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread59681/pg1
and http://www.scribd.com/doc/8789153/Ufo-Area-ReverseEngineering-Roswell-Ufo-Technology
 Lecture given by Jack Shulman, President of the American Computer Company, at the Global Sciences Congress 
Also mentioned there
http://books.google.com/books?id=mzIAeXDNd3sC&pg=PA240&lpg=PA240
James Michael DuPont (talk) 04:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: It's been a decade since it was Z-Division (name changed in a reorg).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryptoboy (talk • contribs) 00:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's "Z Program"
Talk:Chigusa Ikeda

message: In the Japanese dub of Code Lyoko, does she dub Sissi Delmas? Angie Y. (talk) 00:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese dub of ''[[Code Lyoko]]''
Talk:Water bridge

message: Are there any navigable aqueducts in the English speaking world which have the words "Water Bridge" included in their names, or are they all referred to as aqueducts? An example is needed because if there are none then this article has no reason to exist. The one aqueduct referred to as a water bridge is in Germany and does not qualify as proof that the term "Water Bridge" is in fact in use in the English language. Martin Cordon 01:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, Martin. The term "Water Bridge" does not occur in my rather comprehensive Collins English Dictionary. Aqueduct has two relevant meanings: 1. A conduit used to convey water over a long distance. 2. a structure, often a bridge, that carries such a conduit or a canal across a valley or river. The only example I could find  of "water bridge" in the English speaking world on the web was "Blue Water Bridge" - and this carries road traffic! I would vote to redirect this article to Aqueduct. Chris55 23:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I also looked up water bridge in dictionary.com, Mirriam Webster and MSN Encarta and there was only one reference, in Webster's Revised Unabridged, and that made it equivalent to water table, not aqueduct. All the standard American dictionaries such as American Heritage, give both definitions for aqueduct, although interestingly most include pipes carrying water by gravity, a usage that it is not common among British engineers as far as I know. Chris55 15:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example Needed
Talk:Akizuki-class destroyer (1959)

message: This article needs to be split, because there are in fact two destroyer classes named Akizuki. One in the WW2-era Imperial Japanese Navy (see Japanese destroyer Akizuki, :Template:Akizuki class destroyer, etc), and one in the post-war Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force. 71.203.209.0 01:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Disney Channel France

message: I fixed the French spelling of program titles to match what the actual Disneychannel.fr site shows. Somebody seemed to have thrown in some phonetic spellings (e.g. "Fil" for "Phil", "Codi" for "Cody") that aren't actually used, and did a bad job with accent marks (added where they aren't, missing where they should be). We should be more careful. --Dhartung | Talk 22:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overtranslation 
Talk:İzel (singer)

message: The article was pointing to this artist's earlier official website, at izelnet.net, but that domain seems to have been registered for another purpose and now contains an Indonesian (?) website instead. On a quick search I couldn't find a new official site, hence couldn't update the article, so removed the dead link per WP:ELDEAD. If anyone knows better, please add the old or current URL, as applies. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed official website dead link
Talk:John Paul Ospina

message: Hello, I'm trying to do this bio page but don't wan't it be very promotional. Please help me organize it, fix info to add or delete it or rephrase. Thanks to you!--Johnlatinidol 23:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Make sure that the person is notable and follow WP:BLP. Miranda 23:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of The A-Team characters

message: The title of the article is "List of The A-Team characters," not "List of actors from the A-Team". The whole thing should be re-written to lead with the character names, rather than the actors' names. Brendanmccabe (talk) 00:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Then do it.--Boycool (talk) 11:29, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order by character 

message: Murdoch is also called Looping (in some countries, and in the show).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 (talk) 16:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looping
Talk:Rusty Nails (filmmaker)

message: The photo, which was just updated, was sent to me from the director Rusty Nails for use in this wikipedia article. Xsxex 17:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Don't be so quick to call other users vandals- Lisa's edits do not fall under the definition of vandalism. You do not own this article, and anyone who has their own image of the subject is free to use them, provided they are tasteful and properly licensed. You have a clear conflict of interest, and images you supply must be released under the GFD License.-Wafulz 13:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I am sorry if this sounds naive, since I am relatively new here, but how is the IMDb a "partisan website" or "obscure newspaper"? Also, isn't against Wikipedia's policy for you to be writing an article on behalf of your friend any way? I thought Wikipedia was supposed to be impartial. Please feel free to correct me if I am mistaken.W3ndy 04:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You aren't naive. You have it exactly right. =Axlq 20:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo update
Talk:Theocentrism

message: This article needs sources. I found one that I cannot access
http://mj.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/2/174.extract
Here is a book, it will take time to go through it.
http://books.google.com/books/about/Ethics_from_a_Theocentric_Perspective_Vo.html?id=tnMpAjdnzr8C
Here is a very short list of sources
http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=Theocentrism+
I will attempt to examine the later two and see if I can use these to cite content or add something. Anyone who is watching this page may feel free to use these sources. Fordx12 (talk) 22:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources
Talk:Ancient Society of College Youths

message: My Great-Grandmother, Mrs Elsie Hairs, was the only female ever inducted into the Ancient Society of College Youths. She and my Great-Grandfather, Mr Francis Ivy Gain Hairs (or FIG Hairs), were prolific ringers, cycling to ring peals on their wedding day.
My Grandparents, Edwin Arthur Barnett & Olive Barnett nee Hairs were also prolific ringers. My Grandfather was President / Master of the Central Council - see Obituary;
http://www.srcy.org.uk/pdf/Newsletter2004.pdf
Kersti Bolton 61.9.202.250 01:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I have removed two dead links from the article, and placed them here for future reference.
 
</br></br>
  </ref>
Although I added a new inline citation, it is from 1879 and does not provide information for the current organization. More citations are needed.--DThomsen8 (talk) 01:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links. 

message: This article has been tagged as of questionable notability. I should have thought that a directory definition by Charles Dickens was sufficient, however I suspect that more references by other independent sources would help prevent this article from being deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester Universities Guild of Change Ringers regarding possible deletion of all ringing societies.   Oosoom Talk  12:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability questioned June 2016
Template talk:USCongDistStateCA

message: The current navbox looks like this:
I propose two changes.  First, I'd like to add Redistricting Commission to the bottom line, between the links to Redistricting and Gerrymandering;  Second,  I'd like to add an image of the state's current congressional districts.,
The result would look something like this:
Ideally,  would be expanded to permit the inclusion of a link to the state's Redistricting Commission and an optional image of the district boundaries, but that's not an absolute requirement.  The key question is whether other editors consider this proposal the improvement that I think it represents.  Thanks. 67.100.125.181 (talk) 04:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Your changes would make it inconsistent with the 49 other U.S. Congressional District State navboxes. Even Template:USCongDistStateNJ does not currently list their previous redistricting commissions. I think you should better get feedback from Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Congress too, which would likely be more concerned with consistency with all these navboxes than Wikipedia:WikiProject California would. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why each state cannot have specific links, like it does for maps, on its redistricting efforts for each state, rather then a link to the generic article. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I agree that the proposed change would make it less consistent with navboxes used by the 49 other states but hardly "inconsistent"; the decrease in consistency is minor, and IMHO outweighed by the increased relevance and access to a key article about CA's process for redistricting.  Again, I would welcome expanding  to permit this change, but I suggest gathering further evidence that the proposed change is worthwhile.  If its worthwhile, it makes sense to ask Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Congress if they would implement support for the features we want.  67.100.125.157 (talk) 01:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two proposed changes
Template talk:Governors of California

message: I tightened the formatting by following the Template:Governors of Massachusetts, but I kept the flags, moving them to the right of the sub-section headings.  It looks much neater now.  Wyeson 00:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And I reverted it because the formatting was broken. The lists were no longer a list and the images overlapped the header texts. Do NOT reinstate before fixing any issues. Use the sandbox for that. -- User:Edokter  16:00, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: There was no "sovereignty". There was no "republic". Simplified/clarified section titles. WCCasey (talk) 06:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting real
Talk:Product integral

message: This article was created to fill a gap I found amongst mathematicians and non-mathematicians (especially ecologists and biologists) alike. There is a need to add something about MATRIX PRODUCT INTEGRALS (especially with regard to Survival Analysis - see Richard Gill's webpage in references)
Daryl Williams 01:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, if matrix-valued functions are not treated, doesn't this sort of integral degenerate into something of a triviality? Michael Hardy (talk) 18:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Filling a gap

message: On my Firefox browser from Fedora Core 5, the prime on f'(x) in the note to "The Fundamental Theorem" does not show up, although I see it is there when I display the page in the "edit this page" mode.
Tashiro (talk) 11:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Typography in note to The Fundamental Theorem

message: I've deleted Type III because it was simply incorrect equation: right sides of Type I and Type III were equal while left sides were different. Also note that notation used in this 'example' usually used for finite/descrete product. --MathFacts (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type III 

message: I find it rather annoying and silly that this page contains multiple links which lead to the page itself. If there does not exist another page that discusses the topic in greater detail, then the link should be red. If this page contained enough information for each of these topics, then there would be no need for these links at all. If there is not enough information available for this page, then it should be amalgamated with other pages like it, in a page called "alternative calculi", though I am not sure of the existence of such a page. To summarize, this page needs to be fixed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.5.154.76 (talk) 23:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. I've stripped them all out. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 08:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links?
Template talk:SF Bay Area

message: I saw an edit by Nyttend which added Santa Cruz and San Benito Counties along with their cities to the template.  At first my reaction was, "those aren't among the nine counties of the Bay Area."  But on the San Francisco Bay Area page, it points out those are included in the Census Bureau's definition of the contiguous metro area.  And the Census Bureau is usually WP's preferred reference when available.  So after looking through that, now I agree.  You've also got me thinking I should update List of airports in the San Francisco Bay Area and its accompanying navbox to be consistent with this. Ikluft (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What you saw was Nyttend's version after he changed that article.. It has been reverted back since it appears he made a change without participating in the endless discussions on Talk:San Francisco Bay Area regarding San Benito and Santa Cruz counties. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up.  I had already made the changes to List of airports in the San Francisco Bay Area. For the airports list it's a toss-up either way, and makes at least as much sense with the wider definition.  I posted an explanation on Talk:List of airports in the San Francisco Bay Area why I suggest leaving it that way, at least for now. Ikluft (talk) 03:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Santa Cruz and San Benito Counties 

message: I think the template could be trimmed of some outlying areas, but such trimming must be judicious. Certainly, all of Contra Costa and Alameda counties are considered part of the East Bay, per such authority as East Bay Regional Park District, which includes every portion of those two counties. Binksternet (talk) 05:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The primary idea was that this was suppose to be metropolitan area template listing municipalities and communities, not a pure geographical region template. Since the consensus is that the SF Bay Area metro area consists of nine counties, those communities in those counties should be included in the template. Zzyzx11 (talk) 15:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outlying areas 

message: For those on the fence about whether this template should cover the northern bits of the Monterey Bay, fence-sit no more, there is now a  template for you. -- Charlesreid1 (talk) 01:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Monterey Bay Area
Talk:Balzac, Alberta

message: Hamlet is defined as smaller than a town or city, pop 40,000 tho? 12.220.252.74 (talk) 15:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamlet is defined as smaller than a town or city, pop 40,000 tho?
Template talk:Alameda County, California

message: It's not entirely clear that all of the "communities" named here existed. Particularly those identified as landings or stations might have been just the transport facility by itself. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 20:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say I may agree with you. I have caused a few to be deleted or merged and started a discussion resulting in another being substantionally expanded (Roberts Landing). In many cases it is possible that all that existed was the station and nothing notable existed. See this deletion discussion for a few links: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert, California. If you find any more that you don't think are notable, you can propose them for deletion. It may be helpful to make an account to keep track of your edits.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 02:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Existence of former communities
Template talk:Oakland, California neighborhoods

message: We should first add an article or article section on this subject, before putting it on the template.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.142.140 (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: well, ive done some more editing, and i see that templates can have redlinks. to work towards resolving this issue, i went ahead and created a stub article on the oakland koreatown, by simply moving the section into its own article. if the article can stand on its own, then the template is justified in including it.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Shouldn't Koreatown/Northgate be moved from North to Central? That's what the maps on North Oakland and  indicate. Mike Linksvayer (talk) 18:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Koreatown
Talk:Blinky (image)

message: * I vomited a little in my mouth writing this. Just wanted to make clear the difference between blinky flashing toys, and blinky images. :P
* The first person to put a "doesn't cite sources" tag on this article WITHOUT taking 10 seconds to go to Google and typing in 'blinkies' gets slapped with a trout. I'm absolutely serious.
::::Tiki God 01:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Infobox kana

message: If anyone can improve this template by putting in some parser functions or anything else, please do. I don't know how. --Tea and crumpets 15:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

message: As you can see, the two man'yogana are listed, but which one is the progenitor of which kana is not specified.  They list the Man'yōgana that the kana derives from, but it NEEDS to be made clear which mayogana the hiragana derives from and where the katagana dervies from.  For excample, け comes from 計 and ケ comes from 介, but the info box does not make that clear.  I made the mistake.68.148.164.166 (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Man'yogana In Infoboxes 

message: I changed the display "hiragana/katakana manyogana" to "h/k origin". In manyougana, there's no hiragana nor katakana, and multiple kanjis represented a syllable. See also hentaigana for the history of kana. Thanks for your interest in Japanese. --Ahora (talk) 09:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason of Dec 2012 edit
Talk:Sal Piro

message: I'm not sure as of yet how this is done. I have done some cataporizing but mostly cut and paste. If someone wouldn't mind. It needs to be catagorized as Film Actor, Television Actor, documentary appearance, Author (or writer). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Miller (talk • contribs) 02:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catagories need to be updated on the article