lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sudoku Cube

message: "Is it possible to link searches of "sudoku cube, sudoku kube, and sudocube onto this page? This new toy is known by many names as of late."
-Kyle
Someone gave me a Rubik's Cube and an electronic Sudoku game for Christmas and I wondered if anyone had ever combined them.  I was thinking that a 9x9x9 'Sudokube' would be a little hard to solve.  :-)  69.141.232.16 02:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "This makes solving the cube slightly more difficult than a conventional Rubik's Cube because each number must be in the right place and in the correct orientation."
I'm not sure I follow. I thought that the Rubik's Cube was designed in such a way that there is only one possible combination that corresponds to a correctly solved cube - i.e. the orientation of the squares is always the same on a solved cube. 217.155.20.163 18:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What you say is in fact true, except for the centre cubies. Effectively, the cube is equivalent to those Rubik's cubes you sometimess see that have a picture in each face in the solved state instead of colours. I have ammended the text to reflect this. Swap 00:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The center square of each of the faces cannot actually be moved.  It may be rotated in place when one of the faces move, but each center square always stays the same in relation to the other centers.  For example, if a 7 is in the center square on one side and on the side directly opposite there is a 4 for the center square, no matter how the cube is rotated, the 7 and 4 will always remain opposite.  The same holds true for any of the adjacent faces.  They can rotate, but all four adjacent centers rotate together, and thus the relation between any one face's center and the four adjacent centers will always remain unchanged as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.72.52.253 (talk) 04:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah; it's the rotation of the centre squares that's the additional thing. On a sudoku cube, there's at least one solution in which on each face all the numbers are the same way up. Sabik (talk) 09:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orientation? 

message: I placed a cleanup tag on this article.  The description of the cube makes very little sense.  Is the orientation of the numbers significant or not? What's a "cubie"?  Jargon and slang should be avoided.  Who produces this cube?   It says it's harder than a Rubik's Cube, but why -- and says who?  Oh yeah, the whole thing is completely unsourced.  67.168.67.136 15:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: This article was once located at Sudokube. I moved the article because during the AfD it was discovered that the Sudoku Cube is the better represented product while the Sudokube appears to be a minor copy (based on sources found). Bill (talk|contribs) 17:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move notes 

message: Anybody? :) http://mspaintadventures.com/?s=4&p=001087 .froth. (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sudocube
Talk:William de Vere

message: Hm.. The Handbook of British Chronology 2nd ed. (1961) is showing the predecessor as Robert Foliot and the sucessor as Giles de Braose. Some newer source show something different? Ealdgyth | Talk 03:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, Wikipedia calls for citations pretty much for everything, even things that most scholars would not think need citation. It's not an encyclopedia just for scholars, but also for anyone reading, and so has different citation standards than other scholarly encyclopedias. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Predecessor and Successor
Talk:William of Heytesbury

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 22:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Richard Swineshead

message: I think it rather unhelpful to relegate Swineshead's alternative appellations to a note at the bottom of the page, as Charles Matthews has done in his recent edit.  In a print encyclopaedia these would appear in parentheses immediately after the headword, and with good reason.  Thoughts?  — Brunellus 19:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:My Fair Lady Cocktail

message: This article is on the Mixed Drinks WikiProject to-do list to be merged with several other related articles, all created by the same bartender. This will be completed as soon as someone has the chance to complete the process.
It is important that this page be kept and turned into a redirect to preserve the edit history of this drink for GFDL license requirements. Thank you. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 15:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Royal Arrival

message: This article is on the Mixed Drinks WikiProject to-do list to be merged with several other related articles, all 
created by the same bartender. This will be completed as soon as someone has the chance to complete the process.
It is important that this page be kept and turned into a redirect to preserve the edit history of this drink for 
GFDL license requirements. Thank you. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 15:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Scipione del Ferro

message: "In 1543, Gerolamo Cardano and Lodovico Ferrari (one of Cardano's students) travelled to Bologna to meet Nave and learn about his late father-in-law's notebook, where the solution to the depressed cubic equation disappeared."
Did it disappear? Or did it appear in the notebook? 129.127.69.229 (talk) 04:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A tedious bit of vandalism from May that no one noticed -- thanks for pointing it out, I've reverted. --JBL (talk) 17:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  disappeared vs appeared
Talk:The Moon Lay Hidden Beneath a Cloud

message: This used to be a good and extensive article on an interesting band - now about 90% of it has been removed. What happened???
:Vandalism happened. Someone deleted the vandalism rather than reverting it. I've since reverted it. :bloodofox: 10:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Excellent thank you - that was quick!! Sbgrant 12:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to this article? 

message: Normally I would oppose inclusion of unofficial MySpace pages, for fear of proliferation.  At this point, as the official page is down, and as the Der Blutharsch MySpace lists the "tmlhbac" myspace as a friend, I'm in favour of keeping it, barring that proliferation I mentioned fearing. - BalthCat (talk) 01:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MySpace (Argument to keep) 
Talk:Zombie (cocktail)

message: I'm thinking about changing the photo back to the original.  Granted, the photo wasn't 100% perfect, but BrianIgmac's readjustment makes it too green.  Thoughts, anyone?  Magnetic Rag (talk) 02:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also note that it is not in a "zombie glass"  vlad§inger  tlk  04:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: - Reference 1 shows a different recipe than on the website  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.197.215 (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Various problems with this article
Talk:Miss World 2003

message: Miss Iceland did not enter to the Top 20 but you included her.
Miss Dominican Republic, María Eugenia Vargas did enter to the Top 20, please refer to any Youtube video showing the Top 20.
Thank you so much.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.45.223.77 (talk) 00:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss Iceland was not a semifinalist of the Miss World 2003 contest 

message: I have restored the judges section content, (diff). It was removed with a rationale of “removed unsourced and/or irrelevant sections” (diff). The content is directly relevant, significant and of importance relative to the article's topic, and the restored content is properly verified with inline citations to reliable sources. Sources used in the restoration include those from News24, Getty Images, China Daily, Australian Broadcasting Corporation and BBC News. North America1000 06:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judges section restored 
Talk:List of Flash Gordon comic strips

message: This list of story titles began with a story list published in Comics Revue magazine.  It's been refined, corrected and added to, incorporating exact start and end dates for all strips (I have verified each one against my own collection which is 100% complete for Sundays and about 90% complete for dailies).  Story titles come from titles given in the actual strips whenever possible (this was not very common), the writers when possible (all Jim Keefe Sunday story titles came directly from Jim and all Thomas Warkentin story titles came directly from his widow, Rosemary) or reprints that published the stories with a title. 
Beowulf_Prime 21:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The list also agrees with my data, and I have all of the strips, both Sundays and dailies.  Sometimes it is not exactly clear on which date a story begins or ends, because there are some transition strips between stories, but aside from that, the list seems to be correct.  Certainly, it is the best information available on this subject.  I think the "unverified" tag should be removed. Rick Norwood 22:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paul Copley

message: ....There's a lot of evidence to suggest that he also played Chaunterclier Guardsley (Professor of Psychosociology and Skeptic) in The Day Today, isn't there?
(I guess someone's now going to tell me "....no there isn't...."?)
82.3.144.140 (talk) 13:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  D2D? 

message: He played Jamie, the gay man who worked at Maxine's floristry shop. He, the shop and her rabbits are the three things I remembered about this programme. Smlark (talk) 22:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mistress (series 2, 1987)
Talk:Badr al-Din al-Ayni

message: I have classified this article as "low importance". The reason being that the article doesn't make it clear why he is any different from the hundreds of Islamic scholars that have existed through out 1,400 years of history.
Also, I don't this article can be classified as B-class yet. It comprises of only one major section. It covers only his life. We are only told the names of his works, but not the content, nor his themes, nor the influences nor given any literary criticism of his works. This article needs more expansion.Bless sins (talk) 20:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nikolai Golitsyn

message: What happened to him after the Revolution and where did he die?  Badagnani 21:57, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Later life?

message: 9 January or 29 January??? MAKE UP YOUR MINDS.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.248.160 (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: DATES
Talk:Kasuga-class cruiser

message: This has been omitted because, although Kasuga was still afloat, her role was not operational - merely a training ship. Folks at 137 22:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII tag

message: This article should be merged into the general  article as the Japanese ships differ only in minor ways from the three Italian ships.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Quintron

message: Well, I am the one who added the name. I got the name from the name his songs are written by in his repertoire at . Can a dead man write songs? No. Either he is using a different name in writing his songs (I doubt it....i'm pretty sure a legal name has to be used) or the Math FAQ is wrong. Quintron couldn't have died in 1995....I just talked to him through email.....he still performs live......we are being lied to.
--readytodie 17:41, 29 December 2006
I spoke with Quintron, in person, about three weeks ago.  He's not dead.  The problem is that there is massive confusion between Robert Rolston, and Jay Poggi.  Check out the AMG article.  These NOLA 9th ward artists apparently love to feed everyone bogus info.
--Eli lilly 00:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Quintron die in 1995?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/W.marsh 2

message: This entire procedure seems very silly, there was no need to go thru an RfA in this case and if there's a snowball promote this has to be the case.  Move for a motion of promotion w/o waiting the full course.
Support
#--Tawker 22:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Nah, you just wanted to deny W.marsh a record setting vote count ;). NoSeptember 17:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Oh yeah, well that too. Cue evil cackle. - Taxman Talk 18:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose skipping the 7 day timeframe 

message: # NoSeptember 17:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of those who didn't have a chance to 
vote
discuss:
Talk:Cox box

message: Needs major revision, someone please help me wikify it or give me sources Liist 22:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision

message: Added some info & started to organise but my knowladge is somewhat limited use of stopwatch etc. can prob., be assumed in the histroy seciton but don't know detials. Wariations on position & number of speakes probably exist as do methods of measering stroke rate (i'd assume something one stroks swivel but dont' know. Nate1481 21:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is actually a different device, called a speed coach. Bassett42 (talk) 12:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added info

message: This article would be better w/a picture, if anyone has one. Cs92 17 November 2006
Maybe see if the pictures here aren't copyrighted? http://www.nkhome.com/rowing/coxbox.html --The Spith 15:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If I can find my camera I'll take one when I go down the boathouse tomorrow.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.228.174 (talk) 14:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: This contrib was deleted a while back, i can see why it might be considered useless. But i'v been rowing for years and it is a pretty good of describing how rate and strokes are affected.
"The rate:power ratio may be compared to spinning a wheel: you can spin it hard and slowly, or very softly and quickly."
Burklert 11:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: stroke rate

message: Although I do not read Hebrew, one of the references in this article appears to be irrelevant. Unless someone else does something more quickly, I proposé to remove the link after further checks when I am properly logged in. 78.115.95.9 (talk) 07:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: done, after logging in -- jw (talk) 09:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference s
Talk:BL 16-inch Mk I naval gun

message: The article is deficient in describing the gun since it neglects to say if the barrel was rifled or not. Dismalscholar (talk) 17:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Smoothbore guns were discarded in the 1880s. The default has been rifled guns for a very, very long time.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rifled?
Talk:The Kingstone School

message: Victuallers 23:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Changed founding year from `78 to `87, i know the founding year to be 1987 because I was educated there 1992-1997 Stuho1mez (talk) 21:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Really need a reliable source for that. Keith D (talk) 23:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundation year
Talk:Bago, Myanmar

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://myanmartravel.com/bago-formerly-pegu.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sam Sailor 07:26, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: In the intro text it is mentioned this was a major “seaport”.
If it ever was, it certainly isn't any longer. Miles inland from the sea, and further, it doesn’t appear the river is of any consequential size either...  
Bago Region may possibly considered having seaport, but certainly not Bago city itself.
2A00:23C4:C585:8501:9880:88D4:D490:2186 (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not a seaport itself. In fact, the delta has shrunk near Bago since 1925 so it's closer tot he sea than before. However, Bago was a major trading site but I don't know the details of how trade left Bago to enter the sea. EmeraldRange (talk) 06:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the city really a “seaport”?
Talk:All Ladies Do It

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  134.82.135.46 (talk) 23:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Operation Noble Eagle

message: "The air interceptors are manned by Active Duty US Air Force, Air National Guard, and AF Reserve units across the country; Ready to respond at a moment's notice."
I removed this because it sounds like more of a recruitment line than an encyclopedic statement. Also the above paragraph already states which groups operated as air interceptors during the operation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.12.195 (talk) 07:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This paragraph was recently added, while deleting without explanation several other paragraphs and sentences, . I have reverted that edit. —Centrx→talk • 18:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

text: There is more to Operation Noble Eagle than an Air Force contribution.  The Coast Guard was a part of Operation Noble Eagle in it's mission to protect the ports and waterways from terrorism.  This fact is not brought out in this article.  I will attempt to get references to this and add them in some way to this article in the future.  Cuprum17 (talk) 22:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Operation Eagle Assist

message: SUrely there must be some comenty on the Irony that the assumption behind Nato was that it was the United States that would could come to the aid of Europeans, but that in fact the first time the NATO treaty was invoked to require military assistance it was Europeans and Canadian militaries that came to the Aid of the Americans. Entirely according to the Treaty of Course, but not how anyone would have predicted things in 1948!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.83.248 (talk) 22:16, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Simple (philosophy)

message: Is this for real?  Why does a Google search turn up nothing about this?  Please add sources.  Badagnani 22:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: -----What do you mean? The entry has references right in it (Hudson, etc.). Also, I did a google search, using the keywords "simples" and "philosophy", and got gobs of information, most of which seemed to be from university professors. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.162.115.174 (talk • contribs) 
The article has no references or external links to back up the facts as they are presented in the article.  Would the editor who began this article please add some?  Badagnani 01:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Simples&diff=80060642&oldid=80060540 doesn't have an edit summary, so you'd have to ask that editor.  Or, just go ahead and add them back.  I think s/he may have thought you were trying to sell something with those Amazon links.  Badagnani 18:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?
Talk:Caenagnathidae

message: Perhaps also worth mentioning: the infamous "Cretaceous parrot" (as if!), UCMP 143274:
* Stidham TA. 1998. A lower jaw from a Cretaceous parrot. Nature 396:29–30.
* Dyke GJ, Mayr G. 1999. Did parrots exist in the Cretaceous period? Nature 399:317–318.
* Stidham TA. 1999. Did parrots exist in the Cretaceous period? Reply. Nature 399:318. Dysmorodrepanis 22:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

message: A new phylogenetic analysis of Coelurosauria (Senter, 2007) places Chirostenotes as a derived oviraptorosaur allied to Elmisaurus, but places Caenagnathus as a more primitive oviraptorosaur. This analysis indicates the generic separation of Caenagnathus and Chirostenotes. Thus, Caenagnathus needs to be placed in a separate article. Furthermore, Elmisaurus elegans is supported as a North American species of Elmisaurus by Senter (2007).
Senter, P. 2007. A new look at the phylogeny of Coelurosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 5(4):429-463.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.61.237 (talk) 00:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generic separation of Caenagnathus and Chirostenotes 
Talk:Chamber of Representatives (Belgium)

message: I think this article should be moved back to "Belgian Chamber of Representatives". I believe "People's Representative" is too literal a translation of the Dutch term "Volksvertegenwoordiger", which can (just as the French "Représentant") be translated simply as "Representative". --Ganchelkas 13:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added this proposed move to the list of requested moves.--Ganchelkas 14:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Hole-in-the-Ground

message: This page says that Hole-in-the-Ground (for convenience, HitG) is younger than Big Hole. It says that HitG erupted 50-100 kyr, whereas Big Hole's page says that it last erupted 20kyr. Is there an innaccuracy, or was Big Hole a maar that erupted more than once? I thought that many maars only erupt once...
  Guanlong    wucaii  
:This page also says that it erupted between 13,500 and 18,000 years ago; the text is not consistent with the infobox. Both are sourced, but the two sources contradict each other. We should address this in our article. -- Avenue (talk) 23:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd...