lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Unaussprechlichen Kulten

message: the bare dative primarily doesn't suggest a full title of "von unaussprechlichen kulten", as stated in the article. 
native speakers would rather interpret it as "für unaussprechliche kulte" / "unaussprechlichen kulten gewidmet", meaning "for unspeakable cults" or "devoted to unspeakable cults"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.191.247.202 (talk) 10:54, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is correct, on the familiar "dem deutschen Volke" pattern. On the other hand, the "von" explanation may chime better with what the coiner had in mind.137.205.101.77 (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Unaussprechlichen Kulten (sans category) seems like the most logical name for this title. A band allegedly goes by this name too, but the fictional book came first and is probably more notable (considering that on the Unaussprechlichen Kulten (disambiguation) page, the band is a red-link and has been so for some time). For the record, this name is also a song title, though the song is based on the fictional book. Once the move is effected, a hatnote could be placed at the top of the article directing users to the DAB page.-,-~R'lyehRising~-,- 00:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: In the comics, Nameless Cults appeared during the Marvel Premiere issues featuring Shuma-Gorath, and passages were described in Chamber of Chills#3 relating to a toad-esque monster. Savage Sword of Conan#74 notes that Von Junzt was a German eccentric. In this book he also wrote of The Black Stone in the moutains of Hungary near Stregoicavar. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/marvelclassics/files/Savage%20Sword%20of%20Conan%2074/ has most of SSOC#74. 
http://www.chronologyproject.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=1585&highlight=geoffrey
12:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: At Marvel

message: When spelled out with the preposition, shouldn't the full title be "Von unaussprechlichen Kulten"? In German, all nouns get capitalized, regardless. "unaussprechlichen" is an adjective, which should not be capitalized (unless it's the first word in a sentence or, in this case, the first word in a name/title). Cparker 15:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Bucharest Henri Coandă International Airport

message: Why somebody is removing the Asiana Airlines and Air Canada form the Airlines section? These airlines are still flying to Otopeni. 
NorbertArthur 30 December 2005
For 72.200.166.120
* Windjet flies to OTP as of January 2007. The flight is not listed only on OTP website, but also here . Check the IV 434 flight.
* Please provide a reference regarding TAROM's new service to Warsaw. Thank you. Cristibur 19:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airlines flying to OTP 

message: How do you know the starting dates for flights set to begin in the future? And why there are no references for the "Airlines and destinations" section? Is there a special policy regarding this on Wikipedia or in the WikiProject? Can you point me to it? Thank you. BaboneCar (talk) 15:46, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some questions 

message: The new logo that I uploaded is a SVG version of the logo, which are vastly preferrable for logos compared to png or jpg files. In addition, the aerial shot of the airport showcases the entire view of the facility much better, thus I believe that both media that I added to the article are improvements compared to the previous images. However, some IP editor persists in using the older ones. Do any other editors have opinions on this? ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 02:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo and infobox image
Talk:List of types of naval vessels

message: Hum... Isn't it a bit strange to have the Mark_V_SOC in a list of types of naval vessels ? I hardly see how the Mark V SOC can be a "type of naval vessel" by itself. The way I see it, it is just a military, special-operations-purpose motorboat.
EDIT : logging in. Tovarich1917 00:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Zixx

message: Flanngo was described twice incorrectly as a "lizard". He is a theropod dinosaur. The few lizards who sometimes sprint on their two rear legs have an anatomy entirely different from that of Flanngo. His is indistinguishable in form from theropod dinosaurs. I am looking at the video as I write.
The phrase "curmudgeonly lizard carapace" was replaces as it contains mistakes in fact. First Flanngo is a theropod dinosaur not a lizard. Second a carapace is a anatomical structure and he does not have one. Third curmudgeon refers to a personality trait not to anatomy. So I edited that phrase. Nick Beeson (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Flanngo
Talk:William Whiteley

message: Where is Whiteley Village? Justinc 00:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The village is in Surrey --ReddyRose 12:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Campaignbox Italian War of 1494–1498

message: Why only one battle?  Either this template should get more battles on it, or it should cease to exist.  A single battle does not make a campaign. Roy Al Blue 00:47, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still doing research on this, for what it's worth.  I've added two more battles; more should be forthcoming as I get a clearer sense of the narrative :-) —Kirill Lokshin 00:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eve Arden

message: This article had some great info about the show, but since there is an article for the show that duplicated it, I deleted a portion of it, and left a barebones description and a link to the show's article. NickBurns 18:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Our Miss Brooks

message: " Oscar-nominated American actress whose career as a supporting and character actor was due in large part to the fact that, while tall and slim, she was not a beauty."
This statement is extremely subjective, POV, and depends very much on someone's standard of beauty. Saxophobia 14:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are completely correct.  It's the sort of thing you should simply remove. Rossrs 15:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a beauty? 

message: Some sources, which tend to mirror each other and cannibalize each other's info, claim Arden was Catholic, because she apparently attended a Catholic convent school. This most certainly doesn't prove anything as many non-Catholic girls have been sent by their parents to Catholic girls' schools for various reasons, including Tallulah Bankhead, Gertrude Lawrence, Olivia de Havilland, et al., none of whom were ever Catholic. Ann Widdecombe was not Catholic when she attended La Sainte Union, although she did convert many years later. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk)  21:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: In what way is the street address where she passed away relevant?Steve Marethyu (talk) 16:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Street Address?

message: Something I don't understand here.  Arden won the first Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series, but "Our Miss Brooks" was a comedy.  Am I missing something?    Elsquared (talk) 02:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Our Miss Brooks a drama? 

message: *https://www.californiabirthindex.org/lastname/quedens
:no records 1905-1918
:.... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 00:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  california birth index
Talk:Factor V Leiden

message: this addition to the article is woefully wrong as NONE OF THE ORAL Anticoagulants have been specifically approved. No real Oncologist will ever prescribe the XDrugs for Factor V. 
I have lived with this condition and had my first stroke at 38, DVT as well... this whole article needs an Oncologists review. 4QFBI (talk) 04:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifelong Oral Anticoagulants
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/never proposal

message: I don't think you've done a very good job of explaining why these articles shouldn't be featured. Presumably we eventually want every article to meet the FA standards; why are these an exception? Of course, whether they should be on the main page is a different matter, and the current wording admits this reality. Christopher Parham (talk) 00:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And how do you suppose this reform will address your concern? — Knowledge Seeker দ 09:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  By flagging up commercial products as being unsuitable for feature on the front page, we can remove the prospect of a free half page advert for these products ever leading the project. This in itself greatly reduces the impact of such stand-alone articles as marketing tools, and hopefully will go some way to detering such deliberate abuse of wikip. That it is very difficult to determine an advertisment for a product from legitimate content in many of these cases makes this proposal all the more relevant. Restrospective application of this proposal is fraught with problems, and might seriously generate a lot of bad feeling between users, but if a line is drawn this month (or whenever), we can at least curb this possible abuse of the project. --HasBeen 10:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you could clarify the proposal then? I understand your arguments, but I cannot see how this is any different from our current system. Why would this system be better at preventing certain articles from being shown on the Main Page than the current system is? — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Evolvability

message: This article is just a dicdef... I don;t see it becoming a real article. Someone please figure out if it can be or just redirect it to a more appropriate place. DreamGuy 00:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Evolvability is an essential concept of theoretical population genetics and research on genetic algorithms; in population genetics, it is related to plasticity, pleiotropy, epistasis, and mutational robustness. These things should have their own portal! - Samsara 11:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I disagree. In fact this article is integral to evolution itself. Evolvability isn't just the definition of the underlying process of evolution, but is itself a survival trait that has been highly adapted over the course of evolution. Evolvability is necesary for survival - species that have a poor ability to evolve would be at the mercy of species that adapt more quickly. Sexual reproduction is an excellent example of evolution for evolvability. Sexual reproduction allows the variation necessary for evolution but without heavy risk of failure - heathly individuals will likely produce a healthy offspring - but importantly that offsping will differ from both parents. This concept needs to be worked into a variety of articles related to evoution. Asdf96 (talk) 16:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose the merge of Evolutionary Trade-Offs into this document. The examples listed are clearly linked to natural selection and the ability of organisms to respond to selective pressure.Kyle(talk) 20:32, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose the merger, the topics are distinct. You can have different levels of evolvability for reasons that have nothing to do with tradeoffs, and you can have tradeoffs that have nothing to do with evolvability. Joannamasel (talk) 02:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

text: Oppose - I agree with Joannamasel. The concepts are definitely distinct, even though they can strongly affect one another. It may be worthwhile clarifying the distinction in the articles though, since it's a reasonable observation that they're related. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 11:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing proposal with no support for the merge. Klbrain (talk) 14:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Jimmy Del Ray

message: Why is the name "David Ferrier" here???  
Who is David Ferrier?
The second paragraph starts off with the name "Richland" without any other reference to Richland on the page!!!
Searching on the name "James Richlund" (with a u) redirects you to this page.
imdb.com says Jimmy Del Ray's birth name is "James Richlund".  I suspect they are right, and David Ferrier is way off base.
Someone who who knows what's what needs to correct this page.
Jerryldixon (talk) 23:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is his real name? 
Talk:Northrop Gamma

message: Gamma versions are hard to sort through, a second look from someone more knowledgable would be appreciated. - Emt147 Burninate! 01:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there really a C-100 as the redirect suggests? --Colputt 20:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The C-100 was a single 2D Gamma (serial number 42-94149 msn 2 formerly NC13758) impressed into USAAC service in October 1942, re-designated UC-100 in January 1943, grounded due to shortage of spares 1943. So the answer is yes there was. MilborneOne 21:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm going to assume that the part about the Antarctic expedition actually meant to link to the page on the RSS Discovery II, and not the Discovery II? I can't say I know this for sure, but I would be surprised to see a sternwheel riverboat rescuing Antarctic explorers (although it would be an interesting story), and the fact that the RSS Discovery II is an Antarctic research vessel is suggestive. Thus, I am going to change it. If I am wrong, feel free to change it back. And let me know, because I'd be very curious to hear the whole story behind it. =) .45Colt 14:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery II
Talk:Nursing research

message: في عام 2008 انشات وكالة ابحاث رعاية الصحة والجودة (AHRQ ) ، هذا البرنامج لتبادل وتوثيق برامج تحسين جودة الرعاية الصحية ، بما في ذلك : 
مئات من ملفات التمريض المتجددة المبتكرة . 
كل من ملفات التمريض الواردة في هذه المجموعة يحتوي على تقييم الادلة التي تقيم مدى قوة العلاقة بين الممارسة المبتكرة والنتائج الموضحة في الملف . Ayah qasem (talk) 14:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:   ممارسات تحسين الجودة المعتمدةالمعتمدة على الأدلة
Talk:Stefan Vojislav

message: I am asking you as a administrator and  as a senior Wikipedian who knows the subject, are those reasons valid why so much text is erased recently by  ? User:Theonewithreason (talk) 22. November 2020 (UTC)
:Please refer to Template:Infobox royalty/doc. The title parameter is not used for a full or formal title. On Louis XIV it does not say "by the grace of God king of France and Navarre", for example. Surtsicna (talk) 21:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not used for a "full or formal" title? Then restore his basic title. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 22:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely the basic title is prince of Dioclea? Surtsicna (talk) 09:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why ?
Talk:Ted Nugent (album)

message: Why does this sound like it was written by Ted Nugent's publicist?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Megathom13 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuetrality? 

message: I don't know what version I have, but in addition to "Magic Party" (now track 13 on my version) I also have live versions of "Stormtroopin'", "Just What the Doctor Ordered", and "Motor City Madhouse". I don't know if anyone has the scoop on what version this is and would like to add it. Thank you in advance. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 20:30, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track Listing ? 
Talk:Anemonoides ranunculoides

message: In removing (for the second time!) capital letters from the common names I have followed common practice as used, for instance, in the publications of the British Royal Horticultural Society. This practice is also acknowledged (though not universally followed) on Wikipedia. Below I quote from a Wiki page on naming conventions: Wikipedia:Proper_names#Biological common names
:Ornithologists also depart from tradition followed by most other biologists (my italics) in insisting that the common names of birds be first-letter capitalized where the reference is to a particular species. Thus one can write about a penguin, or specifically about the Emperor Penguin, the latter being the proper (common) name of the species, Aptenodytes forsteri. Non-specialists may have difficulty determining which form to use in some cases (for example, is it mallard or Mallard?), but it is likely most references to bird species will eventually be seen and edited by an ornithologist.
I take this to mean that any articles which are about species other than birds should not use capitals for common names. SiGarb 01:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation
Talk:Prambanan

message: Prambanan is not very close to Borobudur, unless you are looking at a large scale map! User:SatuSuro 01:26, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why wikipedia shouldn't use terms such as "close" or "far". If you must compare to Borobudur, state something definite in km or hours of travel. --Merbabu (talk) 10:59, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments re location

message: There always seems to be no shortage of explanations of etymology - and a 'references please' tag that is never acted upon.  Removed until someone can come up with a WP:RS as to what the word derives from.
satusuro 13:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: i 2409:4081:1C17:F5AF:0:0:89CB:1210 (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jay jay shree Ram
Talk:Lithuanian National Drama Theatre

message: Which city is it in? The article ought to say... also, if it's in Vilnius, it can be put into :Category:Vilnius. --TheGrappler 01:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Grievous Angel

message: am gonna do some work on filing the gaps in this article. will start with stylistic stuff.
R7 01:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Should include "country" too and not just "country rock". The album heavily leans towards country music.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.184.143 (talk) 03:51, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Do the A-side

message: Should we also include the cover of the CD+DVD version, if so how do we do that Bakahito 01:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to only include the CD. I guess it is possible to include it as a thumbnail below, not worth putting two infoboxes for basically the same article. -- ReyBrujo 01:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I merged both articles. It is much worse to have two articles with the same information. -- ReyBrujo 17:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD cover?
Talk:Robert Barnwell Rhett

message: The title should really be "Robert Barnwell Rhett." There were several Robert Rhetts running around South Carolina during the mid to late 1800s, and this distinction is reasonably important. I'll make the change if there's no objection within a reasonable time, plus I'll figure out how to set up the reflector. Ezratrumpet 01:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I thought I read somewhere that Rhett favored the resumption of the slave trade that had been outlawed by the US in 1808 and by Britain in the same period?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.121.84 (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Favored Resumption of Slave Trade?
Talk:Subjection of women

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was nothing. This is not a WP:RM, but a WP:MM. —Nightstallion (?) 08:29, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your redirect was reverted. Please check the discussion below. Thatcher131 02:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gary Kremen

message: Was he a victim of crime? If so, why isn't it mentioned in the article? Bjelleklang  -  talk 01:31, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The crime was the fraudulant hijacking of the domain name sex.com. Not a violent crime, but a crime nonetheless. -Agyle 05:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victim of crime? 
Talk:Fox River Mall

message: If Fox River Mall has 1,210,000 sq ft, how can it be the largest in the state when Southridge Mall has 1,223,000 sq ft? 32.218.36.187 (talk) 04:38, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I just did some research and technically the fox river mall is larger. The source for the Southridge Mall only says 1.2 million the same as this mall (Fox River). I then looked at shop counts to see which one had more. The Fox River mall has 138 stores and the Southridge Mall only has 109 stores. And to finish of wee look at the number of anchor stores the Fox River has 6 anchors while the Southridge Mall has 5 anchors. Hope this solves your question, --KDTW Flyer (talk) 03:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's rounded it must be wrong??? LOL!! Shop counts and the number of anchors have nothing whatsoever to do with SIZE.  32.218.33.7 (talk) 03:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, then let's take a look at the source on the Southridge Mall page, it also says 1.2 million. The same as for the source for the fox river mall says the exact same thing, for now, let's just put the two down as tied for largest --KDTW Flyer (talk) 03:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest mall?
Talk:Rock 'n' Roll Express

message: That is a rocking photo of some impressive mullets--Looper5920 01:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Emo (teen subculture)

message: See Emo_(slang) talk page for my comments on this (and note how ridiculous it is to be having to duplicate everything on two separate articles). Also, Deathrocker, it is wise not to go accusing people of vandalism just because you disagree with them, especially when your own edit summary contains a very misleading Google count reference. Mdwh 15:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Nu Emo"
Talk:Kohl's

message: This article needs updating to reflect the possible sale/takeover of the company as reported here and here. If I get time I will try to update the article myself.  ComputerFreak34 (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: So it didn't happen?  I shopped at KOHL'S yesterday in L.A. Torrance. -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 13:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Updating

message: Revise
Chickens 49.207.229.237 (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re rurg
Talk:Danish Crown Regalia

message: Some pictures would be wonderful.
* I found a picture of the orb, but thats all I can find. Sotakeit 19:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)