lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:10–20 system (EEG)

message: The BrainMaster Technologies reference wasn't an advertisement link, but a real reference. It's where I found the illustration pictures when I created the article. The pictures were in the public domain of course. Put it back ? XApple (talk) 20:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The PDF link for "SVG drawing of the 10-20 system" doesn't work for me.  It attempts to access a file on "localhost" and throws up an error.  If it fails for other people in future, maybe it could be fixed or removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.71.226.217 (talk) 13:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Link
Talk:Paul Sills' Story Theatre

message: The creator of the show was Paul Sills, not Paul Sill. And irrespective of Wikipedia style, the name of the show uses the American spelling of theater. Michael (talk) 06:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone with the power, please correct title: Paul Sills' Story Theater 

message: Not having seen it, but having heard the original cast recording many times, I would never have described it as such. It is a series of short plays with incidental music. Michael (talk) 06:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it is a play with music, and is described as such in the opening sentence in the article. The Musical Theatre project template is placed on a broad range of productions: musicals (as one would thnk of them); revues; plays with music, etc. All it means is that the article is under the watchful eye of a particular Wikipedia group. (Hopefully a member of the group will be awake soon and can give more detailed reasoning.)  If you object, however, you might raise it with that group on their talk page Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Musical_Theatre. By the way, I'll make the requested move of the title of the piece in a few hours (I'd like to research the "Theatre" vs. "Theater", since the IBDB uses "Theatre".)JeanColumbia (talk) 08:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (To add: see my note re moving, above.)JeanColumbia (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a musical?
Talk:All in the Mind (BBC radio)

message: I would have thought that this article could have done with much more coverage of the programme, including some of the topics that have been covered on the most recent series (2008 at the time of typing this). ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A big thank you to those who have structured the page bettter - it looks a better to have the specific months of programme broadcasts as sub-headings! ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Thank you

message: If the archives of the programme are put up in the same way as the material is currently presented, it's going to get very long.  I wonder whether there's merit in a table, one row per episode, with one table/section to a series.  The Columns could be: Date of broadcast, topics covered, notable guests, notes (including links to online reserach material discussed.)  How would that be? Fulleraaron (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion for structure

message: Why does this aricle finish its discussion of the 2012 series with references to episodes broadcast in June 2012? There have been episodes broadcast in November 2012  - ergo, this article needs updating. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:41, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs updating
Talk:Another Case of Milton Jones

message: Would anyone mind if I created one page for all of the Milton Jones Radio shows and asked for the individual ones to be deleted?
   - The Very World of Milton Jones
   - The House of Milton Jones
   - Another Case of Milton Jones
   - Thanks A Lot, Milton Jones!
PennyDarling (talk) 17:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging of Milton Jones Radio Shows for BBC Radio 4
Talk:The Last Goon Show of All

message: I think the article now says as much as might need to be said about the episode.
We've got the summary, reviews and the cast.  Djdaedalus (talk) 16:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:The Cheese Shop

message: I think this page should go straight to the disambiguation page, there are plenty of links this could lead to, and this page isn't very well known. It would make sense to go straight to the disambiguation page and have a link to this page on the disamb. page. Brock 009 (talk) 19:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link straight to disambiguation?
Talk:Petrofac

message: This is an important company which deserves an entry.  I have no special knowledge of it, but have tried to create a Neutral Point of View based on documents from the company website.  Please do not extend it just by cutting and pasting from the website.  Corrections and additional information are welcome.  Advertising statements are not. Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Muy importante
Talk:The Borgias (1981 TV series)

message: No mention of the soundtrack. Jakessheep (talk) 14:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As Georges Delerue had one Oscar and three Oscar nominations by this point, the BBC hiring him to do the score is evidence that they thought of this as a prestige show. I've added his credit, which is attested to by Screenonline as well as the despised IMDb.com and his own Wikipedia article. Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 19:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misic 

message: The article currently mentions 'credible locations and excellent cinematography'. Apart from the obvious subjectivity of this statement, it contrasts strongly with the comment on the BFI website: 'The limitations of its studio-bound, all-video production added to its woes...'  Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 19:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it might be easier just to take this out! Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 22:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a little info about the Italian location shooting - it appears that this would account for about 30% of the finished product (and if my memories of '80s British TV are correct it would be normal for outdoor scenes to have been filmed but the majority of footage to have been taped in a studio). At least one British newspaper reviewer praised Kenneth McMillan's cinematography so I'll hopefully add this at some point. Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral POV
Talk:Breakfast News

message: ...when that article looking back over the first 25 years of breakfast television on BBC1 says that Breakfast News began on 4 September 1989.
It actually began four weeks later, on 2 October 1989:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXpJk--0Kdo
It had been due to start on 18 September, but delays meant that Breakfast Time remained on the air for a further two weeks.
Interestingly, a similar situation occurred with Breakfast Time itself three years before, during its conversion to a full-blown news programme - the new format was due to launch with BBC1's daytime service on 27 October 1986, but delays caused by disputes with the unions meant that viewers had to wait until two weeks later, on 10 November, to see desks instead of sofas and Frank Bough in a suit instead of a jumper. Bluebird207 (talk) 01:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just happy that you explain your edits, unlike the person from the 72.x.x.x range who just changes dates willy-nilly. - X201 (talk) 08:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Even the BBC can get the start dates of their own programmes wrong...
Talk:By the Sword Divided

message: I have added Andrew McCulloch, who played Captain, later Colonel Leckie, and Peter Birch, who was the second actor to play Lord Edward Ferrar. Both appear in more episodes than some of those that were already listed and Edward Ferrar is clearly a major character, while Leckie is significant recurring character. Dunarc (talk) 19:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast 

message: The inclusion of Jeremy Clyde as one of the three starring actors seems odd. He is only in 3 of the 20 episodes, and only in one of these does he play a major role. Julian Glover's inclusion might also be debated as he left the series after 8 episodes of series one when his character was killed off although he was featured heavily in promotional material for the series. However it is worth noting that Lucy Aston, Timothy Bentinck and Rob Edwards are not included despite being regulars throughout the two series and playing key characters whom the stories revolved around Lucinda Lacey/Ferrar, Tom Lacey and John Fletcher. All appeared in 17 of the 20 episodes. I therefore think Jeremy Clyde should be removed  and think there is room for discussion as to who else should be featured. If it is on episode count I would note after Sharon Maughan with 19 the next most appearances was the late Andrew MacLachlan as Mr Cropper, but I am not sure if Cropper the Steward would be considered a starring part. Dunarc (talk) 16:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Another possibility might be Peter Jeffrey as Cromwell, given he has major role and features prominently in many episodes of the second series. Dunarc (talk) 20:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starring section in infobox
Talk:Dateline London

message: * When did the program first air ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trinbago (talk • contribs) 22:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Do we need this section at the moment? As far as I recall, only Shaun Ley has appeared more than once (i.e. twice) since Esler left. It could become quite a long list of occasional presenters. Rothorpe (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Presenters
Talk:Dickens in America

message: A note to the person who wrote the long synopses that we have now removed. I have been adding edited versions of them to the IMDb episode pages. They're lovely synopses but just weren't appropriate here, but I wanted to salvage them somehow given the series is not well represented on the internet. Thanks again! The Cardigan Kid (talk) 05:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old synopses
Talk:Green card/Archive 1

message: Archive created by: SkepticVK (talk) 20:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't seem correct.  I know people who have had their PR card for years, and they come to the USA maybe once or twice per year to maintain the status and have had zero problems.  I know a permanent resident card is for living in the US, but many people seem to be just fine.  Perhaps you can cite a part of the INA that says your status will be revoked if you just use it as a "visitor visa with benefits." - Ryan 19:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a permanent resident & i have lived in the US since I was 2 years old (28 now).  I want to travel to Mexico City for vacation, is my permanent resident card all I need to leave & return to the US?  Or what other documentation do I need?
Thanks,
Claudia
::You need a passport (where you are citizen) plus your green card to re-enter the United States. The Green Card is a PERMANENT VISA and no substitute for a Passport and also not for an ID. --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 12:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traveling 

message: Where can I find employers who can wait this long process? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eyas Hajeh (talk • contribs) 15:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employers nedded? 

message: This article is missing that you need to apply for a SSN, after you get your Green Card.MarioV 23:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Many already have it, if they are already in the US on H-1B, L-1, TN-1, etc.Offshore1 05:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

text: If you are already in the US on H-1B, L-1, etc and have a SSN, your number will not be changed. However, you need to go to your local SS office and get a new SS card. Your SSN should be without restriction ("not valid for employment" "valid for work only with INS authorization"). --Krtek2125 07:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social Security 

message: I reverted the talk page to its former glory.  If you are trying to clean up the page in general, please sign in, explain why you're making the change, and add an edit summary.  Otherwise it's hard to distinguish from vandalism. SkepticVK 23:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup edit? 

message: Quite a few of the comments here seem to deal with specific immigration situations or law.  There are a ton of forums which cover this stuff, e.g. murthy.com, immigrationvoice.org, and immigrationportal.com, which I think have all been mentioned already. I'm sympathetic to helping people out, but this page is intended to be a forum to improve the article.  Does anyone have any objections to me cleaning up this talk page? SkepticVK (talk) 19:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a common problem on less frequently traveled Wikipedia pages. My only suggestion would be to consider archiving the comments instead of deleting them. Instructions can be found at Wikipedia: How to archive a talk page. Natalie (talk) 19:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extraneous discussion on this talk page 
Talk:Fish (British TV series)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support "UK"; I am the nominator -- 65.94.171.206 (talk) 07:02, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Funland (TV series)

message: The infobox needs an image - Does anyone have one?213.122.45.203 (talk) 22:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Really not good enough. Bad sentence construction, failing to introduce characters properly, overall incoherent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.169.202 (talk) 15:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:Jigsaw (British TV series)

message: Whenever I visit this link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/classic/titles/jigsaw.shtml
Firefox crashes. Does this happen to anyone else?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.242.197.200 (talk) 02:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firefox Browser Crash
Talk:Julia Jekyll and Harriet Hyde

message: Just wanna say the external link to the BBC comedy guide thing doesn't work, if you click on either 'J' or 'H' Julia Jekyll and Harriet Hyde doesn't come up, and there doesn't appear to be any other BBC webpage that mentions it. But I'll leave the link in, in case someone else comes along and can update it. Londonsista (talk) 03:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link
Talk:Uinta Basin

message: As a geological feature, the far more common usage is Uinta Basin, not Uintah. I realize that with redirects and so on it does not really matter, just mentioning it. Cheers Geologyguy (talk) 20:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name - Uintah vs Uinta 

message: Living in Park City, and playing in the mountains, it is without a doubt Uinta. I am currently looking at "Uinta 2" map which describes a section of the High Uinta Wilderness. All literary references to the Uintas are indeed spelled without the h on the end.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.36.83.131 (talk) 01:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uintah -vs- Uinta Basin 
Talk:Playing the Field

message: According to the article 'a young Marsha Thomason appeared in all five series of Playing The Field', I have been rewatching the show on CBS Drama and Marsha doesn't appear at all in Series 4. She may have returned for S5 I don't know because the repeats of that haven't started yet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.127.12 (talk) 02:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Marsha

message: Playing the Field is a BBC television drama series following the lives of the Castlefield Blues, a fictitious female football team from South Yorkshire.
Seems unlikely given Castleford is in West Yorkshire.  Mtaylor848 (talk) 10:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial claim
Talk:Private Schulz

message: Not to be confused with Hogan's_Heroes#Sergeant_Schultz Jidanni (talk) 23:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sergeant_Schultz 
Talk:Bridgehead Coffee

message: Kind of self-serving for me to update the page, but the locations have changed, including the closure of 362 Richmond and the opening at 317 McRae. RILSQIID (talk) 03:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations
Talk:Second Verdict

message: I wonder if the statement at the end of the article "Although this was the last time Barlow and Watt would be seen together on British TV (and the last time Barlow would be seen at all), the Watt character would make one final appearance, in the last episode of Z-Cars in September 1978" had the potential to be slightly misleading. To me this sounds like that Watt only appeared in the Z-Cars finale "Pressure" after this, but he was a still a regular character (in fact the main character in the final series of Softly, Softly: Task Force, which was broadcast later in 1976. I wonder if amending to "the Watt character would  appear again later in the year in the final series of Softly, Softly: Task Force and then make one final appearance..." Dunarc (talk) 19:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now changed this, but am happy to discuss further if anybody has any concerns. Dunarc (talk) 21:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly misleading text
Talk:Something Special (TV series)

message: Should it be mentioned that most of the filming was at The Old Rectory, East Portlemouth near Salcome in Devon - a holiday rental property?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.214.127.222 (talk) 10:14, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a citation for this filming location? According to Justin Fletcher "Tumble House" is located in Porlock, Dorset. I updated the article after finding the interview with Justin where he indicated this. I also noted (following some use of Google Street View and one unverified citation found on the web) that the house was in fact Porlockvale House, which is itself a Guest House). Timnicebutt (talk) 20:03, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Having had another look at the photographs here: http://www.salcombe.com/cottage-details/OLREC I am reverting the location to that of the original poster. Unless that site is using incorrect photo's they are definitely those of the "Tumble House". Timnicebutt (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tumble House location 

message: I propose that sections  == Episodes == be split into a separate page called List of Something Special episodes. The content of the current page seems off-topic and these sections are large enough to make their own page. MrTumble394879 (talk) 12:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal 

message: The  == Format == section is poorly written and it is very confusing and unclear. It seems to resemble something that was copied and pasted from another website.  MrTumble394879 (talk) 12:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear
Talk:Teddy Edward

message: Looking for information about the books, I came to this article. Shouldn’t an article headed “Teddy Edward” either be about the character, or at least a general piece about the character, books and TV series – if it’s to be about the TV series, shouldn’t that be in the title (e.g. “Teddy Edward (TV series))? It might also be useful to add one of the advisory notices, to say “Not to be confused with “Teddy Edwards”, who it seems is a jazz saxophonist… Jock123 (talk) 16:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article heading…
Talk:The Cleopatras

message: I have done some major changes,
 * added an infobox
 * tidied up the cast list, got rid of minor/non-historical entries
 * added a few references and useful external links
 * fatted out intro a bit
 * gave synopsis for episodes
Its not much, but its much better and more user friendly than the earlier page.
I have kept in the linking made by the previous editors, it was invaluable and really useful.
Possible future changes; 
 * new sections,  Style, Music, Reception. in the meantime some of the content for theses section is in the intro, didnt have the energy to flesh it out. 
 * the episode synopsis are a bit messy and need a rewrites but they are fit for purpose. 
 * the names of the characters, especially the ptolemies and cleopatras, numbering/nicknames etc needs to be standardised on the page so that it makes sence with the rest of the wiki.
Thorspeaks (talk) 18:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major revision
Talk:The Family (1974 TV series)

message: When will there be a dvd release?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.43.105.17 (talk) 12:51, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why on earth would you want one? I saw one episode of the original series, and that was more than enough.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:AE26:7C59:4CD3:7AC3:3744:CC57 (talk) 09:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Pitiful webpage for such a landmark program that many tv programs that followed. You could say that the 1973 An American Family was the first but the style of it wasn't anything like the UK one. The Family 1973 UK set a landmark for such programs and should be honoured with more than this pitiful webpage on wikipedia. Someone take a look and make it better and do the same for all such First landmark TV programs. That is know and watch each in case the second one is the one such as this US poor UK better and still used today.
I would but I cannot even find the episode names for any of the episodes. Reasoning If Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em had episode names then other programs around 1974 must have had episode names. But I see many good pages here someone of that calibre needs to put magic to this and other such landmark First programs on wikipedia. After all where would you go for TV information crap IMDB or Wikipedia there is no contest.
80.234.130.147 (talk) 07:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  POOR 10/100 for attempt
Talk:Tikkabilla

message: I'm deleteing "Produced by the BBC's pre-school unit, 4 series have been made since the show began in 2002. The most recent was first transmitted in September 2005." and replacing it with "Tikkabilla began in 2002 and is produced by the BBC's pre-school unit" as I am not confident that this show has ceased broadcasting - it might still be being made. Can anyone confirm please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evilandi (talk • contribs) 22:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still being made? 

message: Did'nt Tikkabilla have a cartoon called Bonny, Banana, and Mo? Snuggleblanket (talk) 20:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonny, Banana, and Mo 
Talk:Timewatch

message: Check the following issues of The Times: 7, 8, 14 and 15 April 1998, and all relevant issues September, October and November 1998, and October 1997. James500 (talk) 05:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: I have been trying to make sense of the episode history of this series. The following document contains what I have been able to determine. Additions/corrections are welcome. Most of this data came from the BFI database. DancesWithGrues (talk) 09:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes