lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of conspiracy-thriller films and television series

message: Seriously? X-files not listed? 80.244.70.52 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What he said. X-Files is the definition of conspiracy-driven plot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.61.121.151 (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: X-files

message: I would like to either see the series presented in a format similar to the films, sortable by year and so on, or at least divided by decade. 80.244.70.52 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Presentation of series

message: Should all series and films that contain even a hint of conspiracy be listed? Then most every single thriller/cop film/series ever made would be listed. Perhaps remove all but those where conspiracy is a major ongoing theme, where specific episodes aren't required to support their inclusion? 80.244.70.52 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, the list of many movies and serials without conspiracy-thriller --Gwaron (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Contents

message: Comedy; a renegade CIA agent threatens to write a memoir revealing decades of agency conspiracies and is pursued by both the CIA and the KGB
The film is not mentioned explicitly, no conspiracy theory. This is a parody, but even in a parody not a single element conspiracy theory. This adventure comedy, not a thriller. --Gwaron (talk) 22:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hopscotch (1980) 

message: Maximilianklein (talk) 23:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat Genres

message: Equilibrium (2002) ought to be on this list. A brief synopsis can be found here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0238380/?ref_=nv_sr_1
3-15 E.B.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2028:17A:5AA1:A164:72F:4F36:FAA8 (talk) 11:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equilibrium  

message: Yes, science fiction. Yes, thriller.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Accurate Nuanced Clear (talk • contribs) 13:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blade Runner
Talk:Google Questions and Answers

message: This page is a mess, hopefully this post will bring it to attention as I lack the skill of sorting it myself
92.17.69.38 (talk) 23:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality of this page

message: This page says that Google Questions and Answers is a new service, but the oogle Answers page refers to this as an old service from 2001. Which is the truth?
198.51.130.254 (talk) 00:12, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: why didn't E.Nesbit mention the name of the old gentle man ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.164.201.111 (talk) 20:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Railway Children By E.Nesbit  
Talk:First fundamental form

message: The example is flawed: 
1) the parameterization does not cover the entire unit sphere, and 
2) it is not 1-1 on the given domain. The point (u,0) is mapped to the point (0,0,1) regardless of u.
It should state that a parameterization of the unit sphere minus two poles is given by ... with the domain of v as (0,pi)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.148.10.79 (talk) 15:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flawed example 

message: The "Length of a Curve on a Sphere" section incorrectly evaluates \sqrt{\sin^2{t}} as \sin{t} instead of the correct |\sin{t}|.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.237.129.169 (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect evaluation 

message: The example currently reads: "For a spherical curve on the unit sphere in R3 may be parametrized as". I find this to be weirdly worded. Why a "spherical curve"? As far as I can tell, the given parametrisation is for a sphere, not a curve on a sphere.  Luca (talk) 09:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why a "spherical curve" in the example?
Talk:Theomachy

message: Do we have a source on the campaign-against-religion-and/or-god bit at the end? If it's accurate, it's certainly worthy of mention, but it seems to have been added without a source. If whoever added it (or anyone, really) has a source for this, please add it!
dcd139 (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet Union bit
Talk:Marcelo Ferreira

message: Is this even the same guy?
If so, add some more personal info and maybe some references to the comic tie-in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartydaniel (talk • contribs) 18:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info on the Black Ops 3 comic tie-in 
Talk:Robert J. Cabral Station

message: I'd suggest not merging the two Stockton station articles, since they refer to two different locations.  This article is the former Southern Pacific station, used by Amtrak trains to/from Sacramento; the facility described in Stockton (Amtrak station) is the former Santa Fe depot, used by trains to/from Oakland.  Unless there are any objections, I'll remove the merge template.  Pitamakan (talk) 16:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Stockton stations

message: Since this is both an ACE station and an Amtrak station, and since it's not the only station in Stockton, the current name of "Stockton (ACE station)" seems doubly inappropriate.  It appears that the official name of the station is "Robert J. Cabral Station", so I'd like to rename the article to this.  The lede can explain any alternative names used (Amtrak refers to this as the "Stockton - Downtown" station, for example).--NapoliRoma (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rename to "Robert J. Cabral Station" 

message: I suggest ending the first sentence at Stockton, removing the reference to the Bay Area, since Stockton is not part of the Bay Area. If no objections, let's remove it in a few days. --Mistakefinder (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove reference to Stockton in the Bay Area 

message: Both Amtrak and ACE serve this station.  It would be helpful to include passenger counts for both service operators.  Unfortunately, few of the other ACE stations seem to include passenger counts, hence the information may be hard to find. Pedro Xing (talk) 04:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  passenger tally 

message: Presumably, this station hadn't been used for some time when ACE started service here in 1998. What was the last service to stop here before them? Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 01:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  passenger discontinuance
Talk:Playset

message: Since there is no article or info that contributes directly from the website, I've moved it to further reading...see WP:REF for details.  Berean Hunter (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved Playset Magazine link to Further reading section
Talk:Computer-generated holography

message: There is a section entitled Digital Holography, parts of which appear to be discussing the same topic as this, and parts of which are discussing digital analysis of holograms.  Is Digital Holography the same as Computer Generated Holography or not?
It would be useful if someone who is knowledgeable in the field were to look at both pages, and combine the relevant bits and separate out the non relevant.
Does Digital Holography have two different meanings?
Suggestion  Combine relevant parts of Digital Holography with this.Epzcaw (talk) 08:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital holography/computer generated holography 

message: I'm a wiki nube.
I'm not very knowledgeable but there seems to be a mixing of the terms "holograph" and "hologram" here. If not then there is a lack of distinction in the description.
I agree also that some of what is here should just be combined with "Digital Holography".
Crgrove (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there confusion between holographs and holograms here? 

message: Can anyone figure out exactly what type of system is being used by this company: www.vizoo.com, see also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7K0GQPnmDI.  The technical information on their site is extremely limited.  At first glance it would appear to be a commercially available computer-generated holography system with a 360-degree viewing angle, but looking closely it appears it may just be creating a seemingly free-floating projection of a flat video rendering, which would look the same from any angle, and just uses videos of rotating objects to make it less obvious.  Wandering Idiot (talk) 16:22, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  viZoo holographic technology
Talk:Francis E. Brownell

message: Cleaned up broken links, reformatted per WT:MILHISTHhfjbaker (talk) 14:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up/Reformat
Talk:List of southern rock bands

message: I see here that we have several different bands, that are not neccessarily Southern Rock, but either use elements of, or fuse elements of southern rock. At the top of the page I have listed a disclaim of such. I think it is a great idea to have these bands listed here, even if not necessarily southern rock, because it allows user to experiment with other bands related to southern rock, and grow the resurge movement of southern rock that we see. 
I am considering a system in which we can denotate if a band is traditional southern rock, rock or hard rock with southern influence or fusion thereof, and finally metal that is southern metal or metal with southern influence.
Any ideas would be appreciated, any help is much wanted.
Ol Red33 (talk) 17:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New System 

message: I am looking for knowledge concerning Stoner Rock, the influence draws (if any) from Southern Rock, and how we might tie that in here... if we should at all... Basically all thoughts and ideas are welcome. This thought came to me when I noticed several bands here can be classified as Southern Rock, but are also frequently referred to as Stoner Rock, and sometimes as Desert Rock. For example, the band Down Which can be classified as Southern Metal, Sludge Metal, AND Stoner Metal... Because there are an overwhelming amount of Southern/Stoner mixes... I was looking for clarification concerning connections, correlations, and how we might go about addressing this, if at all... Thanks ahead of time!
Ol Red33 (talk) 17:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Stoner Rock]] 

message: I like this list; I'm finding it helpful for giving music suggestions to a friend that's into Southern Rock.  However, why is Pantera on this list?  I've never heard a metal band referred to as Southern Rock before, and nowhere on the Pantera page is there such a reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.237.221 (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pantera]]? 

message: How about Potliquor from Baton Rouge?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by COLQUA (talk • contribs) 06:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Boogie 

message: It might be a good idea to correct the alphabetical order.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:4F3:780:E8AB:72C9:FB25:5915 (talk) 14:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetical order
Talk:A Mercy

message: Looks like someone might need to change the title of this page... I do like "A Mercy" more as a title though - sounds more Morrison.
The whole review seems a bit stilted...written by the publishing company perhaps?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.243.214 (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "A Mercy reveals what lies beneath the surface of slavery in early America. It is both the story of mothers and daughters and the story of a primitive America."
Well... that's surely an objective, encyclopedic assessment if ever I've seen one. Sounds more like a plug for the book out of O magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.177.13.133 (talk • contribs) 14:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan Girl/boy alert 

message: i take issue with the use of the descriptor "primitive" as applied to the U.S. -- it's colonialist and oppressive towards indigenous peoples, amongst other issues.  can someone reword that portion?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3C7:4201:5490:E9A5:B41C:E1C8:E807 (talk) 07:47, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Primitive" was correct in the sense that, as an entity named America, it was in its primitive stages—the word wasn't describing the characters. But I agree it was iffy because of its other connotations and, besides, I agree with the previous comment, above: this was a publicity blurb, not an encyclopedic summation. I've replaced it. Largoplazo (talk) 12:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "primitive"?!
Talk:Reader (Christian Science Church)

message: This should probably be merged into Reader (liturgy)! --Orange Mike  | Talk 16:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Someone with good intentions took the words "Christian Science" out of the first sentence.  While it is true that some churches of other denominations have readers, these do not in general conform to what the sentence goes on to say.  I have reverted this page, so that it does not make presumptious statements about other churches.Marc W. Abel (talk) 17:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting

message: This page is linked to from the main Christian Science wikipedia page under section 6.3 on that page.
On the main page, it is stated, in part: "...The Church of Christ, Scientist has no clergy, sermons..."
However, following the nearby link to this page about "Readers" currently under discussion gives, in part, the following information:
"...Each week's sermon..."
"...readers for a period of time (they are considered clergy)..."
Clearly these are directly contradictory statements--could a Christian Scientist please edit this to represent current/correct doctrine?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.103.167.121 (talk) 22:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency with main article (Section 6.3)
Talk:Shawnee Hills AVA

message: Some of the content from the Wine Trails section comes from the merged stub Shawnee Hills Wine Trail. AgneCheese/Wine 03:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the content from the Economic impact of wine trail section comes from the merged (after AfD consensus) Shawnee Hills Wine Trail. AgneCheese/Wine 17:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution note
Talk:Eva Bosáková

message: THANK YOU, Darwinek, for putting the diacritical marks on Bosakova's name.  I figured out how to do it, myself, but not after I had created the page.  I didn't know how to go back and put diacritical marks on the actual title of the entry - otherwise, I would have done it, myself.  So, seriously, thank you.
Miloluvr
Miloluvr (talk) 16:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Semantic web service

message: Semantic Web Services is a general research topic, whereas ESSI is only one (even large) piece of work about this domain. I think the two topics can not be merged. 
:Agree on merging section with ESSI article: my understanding is that only the ESSI-related content in this article is suggested to be merged with the ESSI article, which I agree with. My rationale on this is that ESSI can soon become one growing international initiative of many for Semantic Web Services. So the more ESSI grows in categories and accomplishments, and the more similar initiatives are proposed for semantic WS, keeping track of all that here will only clutter this article. Thus, I think it's better to focus this article on the topic of Semantic WS, and linking from it to all existing initiatives, which each can be tackled more in its own article.--Kgoarany (talk) 14:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have a hard time understanding what it is. Does it have to build on RDF? Are there semantic web services that don't use RDF? 
Does a SPARQL endpoint by definition make a web service semantic?
No.
Examples would help:
What are some examples of semantic web services, and exactly what makes them semantic?
What are examples of web services that are not semantic, and what would it take before they can be called semantic. 
:Semantic Web Services are not necessarily web services that are "built on" RDF. A solid understanding of what a web service is is essential here. Web services are described by WSDL files which are essentially XML files that define various things required to use the service, such as operation names, datatypes of parameters, transport protocols used, etc. However, this gives a machine a limited understanding of what the service does. For instance, if an operation took 2 strings as parameters, the machines reads that as 2 strings and not perhaps as the name of a town and a country. By describing the service using a technology such as OWL-S, we can tell the machine the semantics behind the web service (i.e "This operation takes a town name as a parameter and returns a country name") so that it can "understand" what the web service actually does.
 
85.101.129.75 (talk) 21:50, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: How about a link to bullshit instead? Either all web services are semantic or none. Moreover I've not seen any web service that makes use of OWL-S apart from academic proofs of concept. -- JakobVoss (talk) 19:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not clear to newcomer - Examples needed
Talk:Berry mechanism

message: This article on this important phenomena deserves more that a summary of a J Chem Ed article (esteemed though Rzepa's article is). Please expand this, adding relevant secondary sources, and some solid UG physical and inorganic chemistry text citations. Today I completed the Berry citation, completed and normalized 4 references to Rzepa et al (eliminating the 3 bare URLs), and then, because it was clearly called for, I added the "single source" tag.  Le Prof  Leprof 7272 (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference review and improvements
Talk:List of airlines of Kazakhstan

message: Asia Wings doesn't seem to exist any longer. It's possible that it became Irtysh Air since the destinations it serves are the same. I deleted it from the list. Saule83 (talk) 10:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Asia Wings

message: I think Irtysh Air should also be added to the list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.218.186.165 (talk) 06:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irtysh Air
Talk:Steam whistle

message: I recently added new material and rearranged text.
I did remove the comment added 01:55 26 April 2006 that “Train whistles originated around 1832 by way of a musical instrument designer” for insofar as I could determine that applies to the steam trumpet rather than the steam whistle. 
I rewrote the section on the toroidal whistle that had been added 17:27 07 July 2006, as it had not met the standard for verifiability, and placed it in a section titled “the loudest whistle.”
Steamer405 (talk) 17:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits, 29 January - 04 February 2008 

message: In the introduction it is stated that live steam is used. While this is probably correct terminology, the topic covered by the link is not as appropriate. If it is possible to use alternative wording (such as 'steam under pressure') then this might be a good idea. Otherwise, perhaps some additional commentary could be added to live steam to describe the usage of the term used here? EdJogg (talk) 10:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The live steam article has been changed since I added the link here. I'll insert the original definition at the beginning of that article. --Janke | Talk 18:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's much better, thank you! EdJogg (talk) 23:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live steam? 

message: * Η ατμοσφυρίχτρα συρίζεται απ' τον τρενοδηγό.
* The steam whistle is blown/hissed by the train driver.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4105:ACB9:F5B6:CB4:444E:C07D (talk) 17:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passive voice of συρίζω (whistle-blow)
Talk:ASME BPE

message: This organization is the primary vehicle for the Global Pharmaceutical Industry to create common standards.  I think the post can certainly be added to for further detail, but this is definitely a relevant association for industry that warrants an encyclopedic entry.  It should not be removed without further discussion.Mcgagne (talk) 16:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled Section 

message: "The first edition of the standard was approved on May 20, 1997."  How is the standard designated?  It should be cited properly as an external reference.  Is there a corresponding ISO standard?  It should be mentioned in the discussion and cited.  Regards, PeterEasthope (talk) 14:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  BPE Standards
Talk:CruiseControl

message: If there are no strenuous objections I'd like to revert back to CruiseControl.Net, as recommended by the Wikipedia Manual of Style: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks), which says "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, regardless of the preference of the trademark owner."
(Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not 100% consistent - see this discussion: Talk:.NET_Framework#Title )
--RenniePet (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CruiseControl.Net or CruiseControl.NET? 

message: I'm afraid parts of this article (section Build Reporting) read like an advertisement or sales presentation. Could someone who knows better about the wikipedia standards than me have a look if this is according to the guidelines? Thank you.
Examples:
The left side of the page tells us about […]
The dashboard is a powerful tool […]
Previous project build result is colour-coded so that one can get an instant snapshot of howthe projects are doing at the moment.
The last is not even a full sentence. It reads like taken from a powerpoint presentation.
The 'Builds' tab of the dashboard shows all projects (colour-coded) sorted by name providing some more information.
This sounds good without being informative. 'Some more information'? What information?
62.80.17.84 (talk) 10:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement?
Category talk:African-American classical composers

message: Um, this is ridiculous. 
"Classical" music means one of two things -- music made in the classical era of a musical tradition (i.e. 1750-1820-ish in Europe), or it means, more generally "serious music written for the concert stage, in the lineage of the Western Art Music Tradition." I assume the latter in this case.
So why are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane and Charles Mingus not called classical composers?  When white people innovate, it's considered part of the Western Tradition (i.e. classical). When black people innovate, it's put off in a segregated category, as though they are not a part of Western culture. This point of view is widely discredited and I can't believe it has been allowed to stand. 
I can't find the prior debate on this subject. But this issue is very simple! Either consider this a "Serious Music" category and let Ellington / Coltrane join the club (as have the Journal of American Musicology, and Current Musicology, and Perspectives of New Music, etc. etc.!)  -- no serious scholar discriminates against jazz any more! Or call it classical music and acknowledge that African-Americans were probably not deeply involved in the great era of Viennese chamber music. I mean, folks have claimed that Beethoven was 1/12 black, and that's an exciting discussion, but it's for a different article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blcarson (talk • contribs) 05:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:39th National Hockey League All-Star Game

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:5892.gif, found on :39th National Hockey League All-Star Game, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted