Talk:Clinch River Breeder Reactor Project

message: Intended as a place-holder for a longer article on this topic.  Article is in preparation.  Davidb0229 19:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: "United States electric utility companies, which did not receive the types of large government subsidies provided to utilities in some other countries, were reluctant to invest in such an expensive technology."
The project was canceled for political reasons.  It was killed in the war against nuclear energy.  It was clear from the start that this technology would eventually be cost effective.  The Reagan administration was more then eager to fund this project to completion.  Unfortunately the democratically controlled congress had to kill it to protect their interest.  It was very sad that this project got canceled and that we still don't have breeder reactors.  There is still a battle today about Republicans wanting nuclear power and Democrats opposing it.  This project could of been completely funded by the US, the technology would of been developed and then utility companies could then use it or be forced to use it.  There are many in the industry that would be more then willing to spend the extra money.  So I removed the completely false statementMantion (talk) 03:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed false statement 

message: I removed the following text and link from the article.
* a picture of a ball bearing  that was part of this project ( my grandfathers possession, now mine) https://www.t-mobilepictures.com/myalbum/photos/photo07/2d/d3/11d04639a6e9__1244769363000.jpeg
It's an interesting photo, but I'm afraid that a photo of a ball bearing by itself does not add encyclopedic value to the article. --Orlady (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of ball bearing 

message: One must read fairly carefully to deduct (it's never clearly stated) that this project never fissioned an atom. Entirely absent is whether, for $8 billion, taxpayers got anything more than fraud and an architectural drawing. A hole in the ground? or anything? This article is about an idea, not a thing. If that's all there was, it should be made more clear.
Nonukes (talk) 19:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What did this project actually do? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clinch River Breeder Reactor Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928010530/http://www.nader.org/template.php?%2Farchives%2F926-That-Clinches-It-The-Breeder-Reactor-is-Dead.html to http://www.nader.org/template.php?%2Farchives%2F926-That-Clinches-It-The-Breeder-Reactor-is-Dead.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130330123147/http://www.babcock.com/news_and_events/2013/20130220a.html to http://www.babcock.com/news_and_events/2013/20130220a.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback from New Page Review process