lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Virgin Suicides (film)

message: I'm pretty sure the sentence "Leslie Hayman redirects here." violates WP:SELF, though can't think of another way to rephrase it to make it obvious why that section is there.  Any ideas? ~ PseudoSudo 21:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, the self reference is gone.  Thanks for pointing that out to me.  I'm the one who put it there to begin with since I thought it relevant to point out the reason why she was the only "sister" not to be linked. Dismas|(talk) 21:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Leslie Hayman redirects here." 

message: Is this movie a film noir? WooyiTalk to me? 16:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  film noir 

message: Considering the movie was released three years after the album from which the songs originate, does anyone know why the Sloan songs "Can't Face Up" and "The Lines You Amend" were renamed on the soundtrack? My first thought was maybe they had to for publishing reasons, but 2 other songs from the same album are included with their original titles. Seems weird. 24.79.89.131 (talk) 03:15, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  retitled Sloan songs 

message: Does anybody know any information on the VHS, DVD or Blu-ray Disc releases of this movie? We need to add it to the article unless it doesn't have a single home video release at all. This applies to the European releases by Pathé, and the rest of the world's own releases by Paramount Home Entertainment. CARS FOR ME (talk) 14:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paramount Home Entertainment documentation needed
Talk:You Can Count on Me

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. Near unanimous consensus on the grammar, other titles may be moved following subsequent discussions. (non-admin closure)  SportingFlyer T·C 00:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You Can Count On Me →  – film itself uses a lowercase "on" in the title card Goldenimam (talk) 02:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 March 2022
Talk:The Jolson Story

message: You say There is no evidence that Jolson ever appeared as a child singer.
:I believe that he and his brother sang for troops returning from the Spanish-American War of 1898. Valetude (talk) 10:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot accuracy
Talk:Born Yesterday (play)

message: Paul Verrall was played by William Holden, not Gary Merrill.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.254.243 (talk) 02:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pinky (film)

message: I changed the credit from Patricia "Pinky" Johnson to Pinky "Patricia" Johnson to reflect her name in the film (Pinky) and the name (Patricia) she used when she was passing as white. This is demonstrated several places within the film. Miss Em asks Pinky what she called herself "up yonder" and she replied "Patricia". Dr Canady asks her if she is "Miss Pinky Johnson", he would have no use for using a nickname when he hasn't met her and is meeting her as a professional nurse. Tom calls her Pat and she corrects him that her name is Pinky. The notice of the trial lists "Jeffers and Melby Wooly versus Pinky Johnson, colored" and she is refered to in court as "the defendent, Pinky Johnson, colored".AbramTerger (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protagonist's name 

message: Was Gelling a Jew?
It IS relevant, because the NAACP was founded by a group of NYC Jews, and 2 of the civil rights workers who were killed in the 1960's were Jews.
Starhistory22 (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Reception 

message: " ... the original director, John Ford, quit over disagreements with Waters."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.140.183.3 (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  blatant conflict with Ethel Waters article as to why John Ford did not direct filmt
Talk:Boomerang (1947 film)

message: "It comes back at you again and again." Does this refer to the irregularities that the prosecutor kept finding in the account of the murder? Otherwise, the title "Boomerang" is curiously unrelated to the story.Lestrade (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The correct title is "Boomerang!" with the exclamation mark --Expresso Love (talk) 18:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclamation mark 
Talk:A Tree Grows in Brooklyn (novel)

message: Could someone please add more info to the article?  It's such a great book....if anyone knows more then could they add it?  Thanks.  68.115.104.27 (talk) 02:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info? 

message: I can't find any signifigant content in the article in question.  I'm proposing it for deletion. -Verdatum (talk) 18:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Women writers and the female experience during the American industrial revolution]] 

message: I corrected some vandalism surrounding the Shirley Booth story, but didn't have time trace it back to its origin.   There may have been other vandalism committed by the same culprit.--68.35.156.132 (talk) 20:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I corrected some vandalism 

message: The plot section, especially the third paragraph, has quite a few short choppy sentences. If these could be cleaned up, it might help the readability of the article. Captain Gamma (talk) 20:30, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting the Plot Section 

message: This is vague. There's no definition of this term anywhere on the web.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.105.162.11 (talk) 22:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defacto Novel 

message: Hello. Do users feel that the plot is an adequate length or does it require expansion? I am just re-reading the novel - for about the twentieth time - and it is quite difficult to sum up such a beautiful piece of writing into a minimal amount of words. Thank you. (Galaxycat (talk) 10:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: An article where the wartime popularity of the novel is discussed, could be good context. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/09/publishers-gave-away-122951031-books-during-world-war-ii/379893/?single_page=true 202.8.13.71 (talk) 19:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  some context 

message: In the movie Spanglish, the character Bernice Clasky is reading the novel "A Tree Grows in Brooklyn" at the 54 minutes mark. This information is not worthy of being included it the article, but I thought I'd mention it here. 123.205.19.162 (talk) 07:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanglish
Talk:Gabriel Daza

message: Proof of service from 1937-1939, undetermined when officially ended service, and what activities he did during service. Cornejo, Miguel R. (1939) states that he was an elec. engineering consultant for the Philippine Army until he was formally made a captain in 1937. Paredes, Jesus (April 1939) states he is still active as a reserve officer in 1939.
SanLeone (talk) 01:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military service activity and end date
Talk:Gidget (film)

message: Is Francine, not Frances.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.49.161.44 (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Gidget's Name

message: Just for the record: in all the novels, as well as Gidget Grows Up, Gidget's Summer Reunion and The New Gidget he is Geoffrey (or Jeff) Griffin; in the Hollywood Movies and the 1960's sitcom he is Jeffrey Matthews; in Gidget Gets Married he is Jeff Stevens.  The Kahuna's name also changes, as do the names of some other characters.
Floggolozzo (talk) 20:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moondoggie's name
Talk:Tansu Çiller

message: We should include Ciller's involvement with the Turkmen oil industry, on field: Block 1. As well as her tacit approval of her husbands involvement with the Istanbul drug industry. Not to mention her and her husband's share in Lapis, a front for government bribery. And finally, her involvement in the 95 coup in Azerbaijan. This article makes her look too clean. I wanted to post this for discussion since its so controversial. My article on Roger Tamraz has some info on it.
AaronXavier 23:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ciller's Financial History

message: :In 1997, before she could form her fourth cabinet as the prime minister, she was removed from power in a post-modern military coup.
Please advise -- this apparently contradicts the other material saying she left office in 1996. - 70.29.142.9 (talk) 06:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: coup

message: There are two sources given for Cillers supposed threat to invade greece. Neither support the claim as far as I can see. 79.69.202.9 (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Threatens to have the turkish army in Athens 
Talk:A Summer Place (novel)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A Summer Place →  – A Summer Place (film) is arguably at least as well if not better known than A Summer Place (novel). A Summer Place should be a disambiguation page listing the novel, the film and A Summer Place theme a/k/a Theme from A Summer Place.-- Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 17:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 October 2021
Talk:Born Free

message: Is the fact that the screenwriter was blacklisted really the most important piece of information about this film, such that it is the lead-off fact in the article, getting mentioned before even the director or that this movie is an adaptation of a book? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.187.199 (talk) 01:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blacklisted

message: I don't know where to note in the article that in the United States (before VCRs became commonplace), the movie was shown on broadcast TV the Sunday before Washington's Birthday (now Presidents' Day)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.131.62.116 (talk) 22:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Tie-in to Washington's Birthday

message: The article says: "According to Ben Mankiewicz, who introduces the film on Turner Classic Movies, they used mostly wild lions and interviewed over 3000." Interviewed over 3000 what? Sadiemonster (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interviewed over 3000 what?
Talk:Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice

message: I removed the following-"Critics and viewers alike loved the outrageous touches of humor as well as the satirical look it took on what then was the new twists American morality was taking. Underneath the outrageousness, Mazursky seriously saw an America looking for kicks in all the wrong places." This has no sources and is biased.--99.177.248.92 (talk) 21:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with removal. Appears to be opinion. MathewTownsend (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed
Talk:An Unmarried Woman

message: It seems perfectly possible (though unproven?) (to this editor) that Ivan Karp was in fact Ivan Karp the art dealer rather than e.g. a little-known professional actor of the same name, if/since as stated modern art plays such a large role in this film (which I am only about to watch, unfortunately not having watched it before, unfortunately.) Can anyone who knows more / knew any of the principals / preferably, has a reliable source to quote , shed any light on the subject? (LCCN/VIAF mention another Ivan Karp as well.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 13:18, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ivan Karp
Talk:Down and Out in Beverly Hills

message: I've undone a recent large reversion to the "Synopsis", since the editor didn't provide a substantive reason and hasn't responded to my request to discuss his edit. If any editor interested in this article believes my contribution should be reverted again, please open a discussion here. Cheers!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.190.18.162 (talk) 05:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2020
Talk:Moon over Parador

message: I think there might be an issue of POV with the tone of the "underlying themes" section? 10 March 2010  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultimars (talk • contribs) 06:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the Production notes section, the item regarding the quotes from "The Impossible Dream" says: At least two other characters, the Archbishop and Strausmann's thug assistant, show the same reaction Strausmann shows. Conjecturing a special connection to Julia's role in Man of La Mancha is unfounded. I am removing that sentence.--Jim10701 (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfounded speculation re: "The Impossible Dream"

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: NO CONSENSUS.  Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Moon over Parador →  – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Filmomusico (talk) 20:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The inconsistencies affect titles from the entire English-speaking world. There is the Head over Heels disambiguation page, Moon Over Miami disambiguation page, Angels Over Broadway, Crazy Over Horses, Fire Over England, Fog Over Frisco, Gabriel Over the White House, etc. At some point we hope to have consensus regarding this issue, but until then, it is MOS:CT that we must respect. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if Moon Over Miami and others are capitalized, there is probably a good reason for it, and MOS:CT doesn't dictate here as you see. So, if it is an article on American film, MOS:CT can make an exception, I guess. Look, all the above films that you mentioned are American, even disambiguation pages are listing it as American film, song, TV series, etc.--Filmomusico (talk) 01:15, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless we have Wikipedia-wide consensus regarding all titles using "Over"/"over" and grammarian advice specifying its case-by-case use as a lowercase preposition or an uppercase adverb, whatever we ultimately decide in this particular RM will only represent WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: And that is how you begin changing Consensus - little-by-little.--Filmomusico (talk) 02:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 15 July 2021
Talk:The Buddy Holly Story

message: *Do the Crickets meet with Buddy to discuss a reunion, or plan to surprise him at the next concert stop?
*Does Richie Valens win the coin flip with Waylon Jennings? Because in real life, Jennings gave his seat to the Big Bopper and Valens won the toss with Buddy's bandmate, Tommy Allsup. Clarityfiend 18:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You've forgot to add Buddy's missing brothers, he had two brothers. 'Holly' is a stage name, his real family name is 'Holley'. GoodDay 20:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In the film

message: Anybody know why Amy Johnston is redirecting to Amy Johnson...?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  22:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the actress doesn't merit an article, and it's a reasonable misspelling. I'll get rid of the link. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who are you? 
Talk:Moscow on the Hudson

message: Thanks for improving this article, Karaoke Prince, e.g., changing to first name makes more friendly and informal, adding details and correcting point that Vlad seems to adapt w/o much problem.  Couple things: Past perfect tense "had protected" is to relate its action to a second event occurring in the past.  Here the only other tense is present.  Also rel renaming antecedents of pronouns, when another antecedent is introduced, it's good to rename the original antecedent, especially for readers who don't know this film.  Regards, Paavo273 (talk) 18:28, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving article 
Talk:Cardinal Health

message: german page over Cardinal Health still exists; so don `t delete interwiki. 85.8.124.13 20:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German page 

message: All text for the Cardinal Health site is pulled from publicly available sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.28.59.84 (talk) 13:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Why delete "Competitors" section?  True, an exhaustive list of business competitors may be difficult to achieve; but isn't a partial list more informative (and, thereby, preferable) to no list of competitors at all?--Circus54 (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: These sections can never be complete and are inherently arbitrary, and thus POV.  They also tend to draw spam (the section I removed already had external links to the two companies listed) and the addition of unverifiable entities.  Wikipedia isn't meant to be a shopper's guide.  If we all are doing our job of categorizing properly, a de facto competitor list can be found at Category:Health care companies of the United States.    Some related discussion can be found here and here.  Regards, CliffC (talk) 23:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After reading more about the "competitors" section issue, I can see where you're coming from & would acknowledge that -- done carelessly -- having such a section would be POV (I can't speak to the spam issue).  I take some issue with the notion of a de facto competitors list though.  It is apparent to me (having familiarity with the health care sector) that of the entities listed as health care companies, only a few of them provide similar (i.e., "competing") services as, in this case, Cardinal Health.  What's more, many of the entities provide entirely different products or services (i.e., one might sell gauze, the next might be a managed care organization, and another might actually provide health care).  That said, wouldn't some mention of relevant industry competitors (and acknowledging the source this information was drawn from -- I think I had provided a link to CNN Money or something) prove informative and useful to readers by helping them to more narrowly classify the subject matter?  I respectfully submit these thoughts and am interested in discussing, especially since I am relatively new to editing & am still learning.  Best,--Circus54 (talk) 00:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Competitors" section

message: Now that the stuff on Kinray has been included in this article, as per the afd discussion, how do we make the original article go away? --Ravpapa (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Later: forget it, I figured it out --Ravpapa (talk) 04:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kinray
Talk:Stuart Little (film)

message: I added a list of cast, but some characters may need to be remove.  I couldn't find a page that told which characters should be included on a film page. 
Soave (talk) 03:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: -Mr.Harry potter07 (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast Important

message: Why does the link for actor Jim Doughan redirect to this movie (Stuart Little)? I get that he stars in the movie, but that still doesn't explain why instead of having his own page, his name redirects to an unrelated film. I'm not saying a page should be made for him--hell, he's been in some 4 movies I think, he doesn't exactly merit one--but at least remove the link from all the other movies he's in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fewger (talk • contribs) 20:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim Doughan Redirection
Talk:Stuart Little 2

message: i know to know if its friction or fantasy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.113.93 (talk) 21:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: I think that the other two Stuart Little movie articles should have plots too. It wouldn't be fair for only this to have one. 65.103.84.79
:It's nothing to do with fair, it's just who gets around to writing one for the other movies. Cbrown1023 14:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: Is there a particular reason why Michael J. Fox isn't credited under the "Starring" caption in the sidebar?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.15.52 (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: , it looks like in the film infobox code, someone tried to add the following: |voices=Michael J. FoxMelanie GriffithNathan LaneJames Woods. We do not have a "Voices" parameter so that does not show up. Considering that Fox voices the main character, though, I'll add him in the "Starring" parameter at the front. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidebar 

message: Yes, Wikipedia has articles for millions of nouns. No, we should not link to most of them. How do you decide which ones to link to? WP:OVERLINK. In general, if the average English speaker knows what it is, don't link it.
Yes, you think a particular character is a specific species of animal. No, it isn't peregrine falcons do not speak. That you think it's a peregrine falcon is neither relevant to the plot nor encyclopedic. It's a falcon.
Yes, the falcon is named "Falcon". It is a falcon named Falcon. It is not a "Falcon".
Yes, there is a building in the film. Yes, it is filmed at a real building. No, the Chrysler Building is not the "Pishkin Building". Linking to the Chrysler Building does not tell anyone anything about the film's plot. We would not link from "Mars" to California just because a science fiction movie that takes place on Mars was filmed in California. - SummerPhDv2.0 18:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recurring issues 

message: Why not have a separate page for the Stuart Little 2 video game? Pretty much every other movie video game has a page here. PentyClaws (talk) 19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Game 

message: As I see in the plot section, Margalo is identified as a canary. I know the Falcon calls her one via the quote "Well, well, well, the canary's outta her cage.", but I'm not sure if Margalo is officially a canary or if the Falcon's quote is just a slang insult, since judging by her plumage, she appears to be some species of finch or related bird. Sstanford2 (talk) 19:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Margalo Really a Canary?
Talk:Wide Awake (1998 film)

message: ...from the only thing titled "Wide Awake": I know there was a magazine by that name earlier, as well as the Wide Awakes of 1860, and others. 68.39.174.238 17:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is FAR... 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: The plot is written as if it were a review. The ending of the movie isn´t told.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.255.48.83 (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot unfinished
Talk:Almost Famous

message: — Assignment last updated by Isabella.mitrow (talk) 15:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: American Cinema

message: Is this the actual cover story referenced in the last scene of the film? https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/stillwater-almost-famous-cover-story-1165517/ 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The actual cover story?