lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and the 2004 general election/Archive 1

message: Recovered "real version" after "neutralization" of vandal. by User Zapatancas is trolling. Stop it. This is not the attitude to have on wikipedeia, which is a cooperative effort. If you think wikipedia is about neutralising people and making false accusation go tell the arbcom, SqueakBox 16:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

message: *Here Zapatancas reverts SqueakBox for the first time at Zapatero's years as an opposition leader as of 09:35, May 5, 2005. 
*Here as of 10:23, May 5, 2005 Zapatancas reverts a huge amount of SqueakBox's work at José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero.
*Here as of 10:47, May 5, 2005 SquealingPig comes along making a simple statement that betrays his non native English speaking origins.
*Here as of 10:54, May 5, 2005 squeakBox responds in a civil manner *Here as of 11:00, May 5, 2005 SqueakBox reverts Zapatero's years as an opposition leader back to being a redirect. Instead of debating or reverting.
*Here as of 12:02, May 5, 2005 SquealingPig vandalises SqueakBox's user page, and then proceeds to do so another 7 times
*here
*here
*here
*here
*here
*here 
*and here.
He was then blocked and has now been permanently blocked. It simply is not credible that this nasty troll was not Zapatancas, who already had 2 accounts (Zapatero and Zapatancas, though Zapatancas is nopt a sock of Zapatero), the language used is the same and he has kept up the virulenmt hatred towards me ever since, SqueakBox 15:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History of these sub-pages

message: Adopting a commonsense approach to identification, the administrators of Wikipedia have decided to enforce the provisions of this case against anyone who exhibits behavior similar to that of SqueakBox and Zapatancas, to wit: Hagiographer and Pura Paja, and anyone else who engages in warring, tendentious edits, personal attacks and harassment related to José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and related articles.
Pura Paja has been blocked indefinitely because of his username.
The ban on editing José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and related articles will now be applied to , as will the personal attack parole, because his involvement in the mutual harassment campaign closely resembles that of Zapatancas and it is reasonable to treat Hagiographer, for the purposes of this dispute, as if he and Zapatancas were one and the same person. For good reason, any administrator may extend the article ban to other editors exhibiting substantially similar behavior. --Tony Sidaway 10:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas]]

message: Could someone wikify the reference to OCAM. It does not follow the convention used in Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Citing sources. Francisco Valverde 15:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to ¿OCAM? need to be clearer
Talk:Peripatetic axiom

message: It sounds Greek, not Latin, to me...
Okay, does it still need to be cleaned up? It looks nice to me. --JDitto 19:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I just came across this Latin sentence in Susanne Langer's "Philosophy in a New Key": "Nihil est in homine quod non prius in amoeba erat." I googled to find a translation and found this in "Emotion and Meaning in La Bohème: An Application of the Aesthetic Constructs of Leonard B. Meyer": 'This concept is expressed in the Peripatetic Axiom: “Nihil est in homine quod non prius in amoeba erat" (Nothing is in the intellect that was not first in the  senses).'
Is this indeed another way of expressing the Axiom in Latin? If so, perhaps someone would care to add it to the entry. Nick (talk) 20:56, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The meaning of the Latin there is "Nothing is in man that was not first in the amoeba." In other words, it's a punning adaptation of the principle to evolutionary theory. Given the title of the works you found it in, I wouldn't be surprised if the authors copied it from somewhere, not realizing that it was not the original axiom. 2604:3D09:7B80:CC0:58E2:2FB4:5BD4:EF06 (talk) 20:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A different Latin expression of the axiom
Talk:The Handicap Spot

message: What's the idea of putting an image from a different episode? I think this should be replaced. -- Ido50 23:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode photo

message: I deleted some irrelevant trivia items.  I will integrate the rest in a bit.72.87.63.14 (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:MSK

message: What happened to the article on Minimum Shift Keying? Wasn't there a pretty good article on this communications topic on wikipedia in the past? 8/29/2006
:Follow the disambiguation link to minimum-shift keying.  The article is pretty sparse to say the least, though.  I'm currently working on a new version with lots of detail. Oli Filth 01:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minimum-shift keying 

message: I put in {M§K} as a reference that one of my members suggested.  I tried putting in its own page and it got immediately deleted.  So, what? You cant post something about gaming?? I did not vandalize the page.  
"Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rj00125 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I did not vandalize 

message: I was wondering if anyone is gonna make a new page on MSK - the new TV channel on Sky(UK) I don't know much about it, anyone care to fill me in? Nicolizzio 19:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MSK
Talk:Admiral (United States)

message: The article currently says "The one-star rank was later established permanently in 1986."  This appears to disagree with the article on Commodore, which says this rank was re-established in the US Navy in 1982, only to be removed once again in 1983.  I suspect the latter article is correct, but somebody who knows more should make the change, either here or in the other article. Mcswell (talk) 17:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you're confusing the one-star rank of Admiral (lower half) with the one-star rank of Commodore (United States), and/or Commodore admiral? - wolf 19:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: One Star
Talk:Liberty (Adventist magazine)

message: Should the title of this article be "Liberty" (appropriate disambiguation text afterwards will be necessary), not "Liberty Magazine"? Sure, the website is www.libertymagazine.org, and some text on the website says "About Liberty Magazine", but the title and subtitle seem to be Liberty: A magazine of religious freedom. I propose a name change, if there is agreement.
The other magazines on the disambiguation page Liberty (magazine) are disambiguated by dates. However I suggest the title "Liberty (religious magazine)". Colin MacLaurin 05:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems the title certainly is just Liberty. Since there have been no other comments, I have moved the page to Liberty (Adventist magazine). Colin MacLaurin 10:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:The 4400 Center

message: In one of the episode of The 4400, Alana creates a fantasy world for Tom (before they meet each other in the real world) and both of them live in it for 8 years. The 4400 Center in the real world becomes "Collier Museum" in the fantasy world. I presume that this museum was built in memory of Jordan Collier who was a successful businessman in the fantasy world, as he would have been in the real world, had he not been abducted.
Should we include this information in the article? --ADTC 03:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collier Museum 

message: I have noticed that the formatting for the sidebar is screwed up. It has been place at the bottom of the page and the page formatting is all messed up. 69.151.75.196 (talk) 02:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting Issue - sidebar messed up
Talk:Wallingford, Seattle

message: seems to have been deleted? should find a replacement. phoebe 00:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: picture

message: Petosa Accordions in Wallingford certainly deserves an article. Founded 1922, in Wallingford ever since, in current location since 1955. Photos available in :Commons:Category:Petosa Accordions and :Commons:Category:Petosa Accordions collection. Not a lot of citable sources, but here's a good one: Audio of interview with Joe Petosa, KUOW, 1 February, 2008. According to the program, they also started a factory in Italy in 1946, and stopped really manufacturing in Seattle in 1992. Now, even in Italy, it is hard to get a qualifies workforce so their factory there has reduced output. "We'll continue as long as we can continue…" - Jmabel | Talk 05:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petosa 

message: There is a request to move Wallingford (disambiguation) to Wallingford. See Talk:Wallingford, Oxfordshire#requested move. --Una Smith (talk) 16:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of requested move 

message: The northern boundaries vary by authority. Here are some authorities:
Redfin: http://www.redfin.com/homes-for-sale#market=seattle&min_lat=47.64420773314551&max_lat=47.67334661736607&min_long=-122.34739490325485&max_long=-122.3208852109508&uipt=1,2,3,4®ion_type=1®ion_id=2912&v=6
 ZipMap: http://www.zipmap.net/Washington/King_County/Z_Wallingford.htm
As far as I can tell, Woodland Park is seldom if ever considered part of Wallingford. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaredroach (talk • contribs) 23:12, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neighborhood boundaries 
Talk:WDLI-TV

message: Instead of David Livingstone International, could WDLI simply stand for David Livingstone?
--DangApricot 00:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should it somehow be pointed out the analog channel 17 remains active, even though the article states it was shut down in April of '09?  As of today (1/14/2009), one can still pick it up using an analog television.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.118.4.1 (talk) 20:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analog Channel 17 still Active 

message: As per the template:
There are only 2 full power TBN affiliates in the state; WFSJ in Columbus, and WDLI serving the Cleveland market.
And of those, only WDLI carries all of the accompanying TBN subchannels.  WFSJ only runs the main TBN feed.
There are also 2 low power TBN affilates on the list.
Vjmlhds 03:27, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That still doesn't change the fact that you must provide a reliable source to verify your claim. (WP:VERIFY)  Levdr1lp / talk 07:15, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Turns out WFSJ had added the subchannels in July.  Their article was never updated to reflect that,  I have since done so (with reference to back me up).  So I have just erased my earlier enrty into this article since it's now null and void.  Vjmlhds 16:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WDLI's status as Ohio's only full power TBN affiliate w/ subchannels
Talk:The Blue Bird (fairy tale)

message: In most versions I found, especially French, the heroine's name is Florine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.214.70 (talk) 21:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Fiordelisa?

message: The expansion of the synopsis strikes me as ridiculous.  The point of a synopsis is to tell the story shortly.  Goldfritha 00:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis
Talk:John Oszajca

message: One source says that his album "First Sign Of Anything" was released by Record Collection but another says Warner Brothers. Could someone take a look at the album and see which label released it? --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of record label
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Ackoz/Evidence

message: :Ackoz believes that I was being arrogant, and he's certainly entitled to that feeling -- no one can weigh feelings in a pan.  On AN/I, there were links to several places where Ackoz had insulted the intelligence of his interlocutor and mounted what came down to pseudo-intellectual pronouncements, in my opinion.  I meant what I said much more literally than he believes: when people are educated and striving to support their claims and miss but who then turn around to the rest of the room and shout out everyone else is a dolt, it's much worse than the uneducated person who strives ignorantly to do modest things.  In other words, being a highly educated person myself, I have always found it horribly gauche to point out my credentials or to try to bully anyone with how learned I am.  To me, that sort of behavior is particularly offensive.  The rest of what I said was, indeed, an attempt at ameliorating.  My feeling was that he was upset and that his anger was leading him to corrosive actions, that he only needed some time to cool off, not a ban.  In other words, I thought he had some solid contributions, had lost his cool, and was now in danger of cascading into self-immolation.  
:As for my response to Ackoz coming to my page to tell me what a horrible person I was, I make no apology.  I dismissed his comment and would not, will not, and believe should not get into tit-for-tat arguments.  When someone is upset, I'm not going to try to prove to him that he shouldn't be: nothing good comes from such a thing.  When someone tells you that you're wretched and that he will never speak to you again, what kind of response is possible?  Mine was, "Oh, well."  If Ackoz is over his anger ("irae brevis furor est", Horace said), then I have no objection to his returning -- never did.  I really do hope that he doesn't insist on everyone acknowledging his cleverness, though, as that respect and praise is better gotten without solicitation than with coercion.  Geogre 00:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation, Geogre. Maybe a non-virtual Valium would do the job too, sometimes. Ackoz 07:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by Geogre
Talk:Guatemala national football team

message: Although both celeste and azul are translatable as blue, they are very different colours, and to the Spanish mind are no more shades of the same colour than are red and orange to an English speaker, so it seems most improbable that the same team has two almost contradictory nicknames.  Anyone able to clarify? Kevin McE 00:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with you, they are two different colors, even if they belong to the same gamma. La Azul y Blanco nickname has always been used in Guatemala. La celeste y blanco has to be, if ever, rarely used (I personally don't remember ever hearing it when properly referring to the national team). I say feel free to remove the latter. --ChaChaFut 02:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nicknames
Talk:Zac Efron

message: Please add to the health issues section:
Change
In 2022, Efron opened up about his struggles with mental illnesses including insomnia, agoraphobia, and depression. He developed insomnia and depression after taking diuretics for a long period to prepare for his role in Baywatch.[58][59]
To
In 2022, Efron opened up about his struggles with mental illnesses including insomnia, agoraphobia, and depression. He developed insomnia and depression after taking diuretics for a long period to prepare for his role in Baywatch.[58][59]
In 2023, while promoting The Iron Claw on The Today Show, Efron wore sunglasses due to an eye infection. This sparked concern about his health amongst viewers. Source: https://nypost.com/2023/12/20/entertainment/why-zac-efron-wore-sunglasses-on-today-show-hes-not-well/ Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/zac-efron-sunglasses-today-show-b2467595.html TheSummerHealey (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2023 

message: He no longer looks like the current photo displayed of him in 2017, I think another image should replace it to reflect that. UlyssesYYZ (talk) 22:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Image 

message: Please remove the yellow background color and the cross symbol on the movie Ricky Stanicky on Zac Efron’s filmography. The movie has been released already.
https://www.primevideo.com/detail/amzn1.dv.gti.0b76b7e1-e764-455a-8940-483e668ef2b8 120.28.249.38 (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: QuietCicada  chirp 18:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please remove the post production on the notes section since you can't have a movie that's released and yet it is still in post production. 122.55.235.122 (talk) 02:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2024 

message: Please remove the post production note on the movie Ricky stanicky on the filmography. You can’t have a movie released already and till has post production note. 120.28.249.38 (talk) 15:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Jamedeus (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 March 2024
Talk:Imam Samudra

message: _ _ The 3 cited reports never use this like a single name, but respectively
# "Imam Samudra" thru-out
# "Imam Samudra" repeatedly, "Abdul Aziz" once ("original name") and "Mr Samudra" once near end. ("Imam" can be a title, i think, but perhaps also a (given?) name.)
# "Abdul Aziz" twice, and "Aziz" at the last ref (in the middle of the article).
_ _ There's no evidence at hand that anyone calls him "Abdul Aziz Imam Samudra", and (contrary to the piping of his Cats), both "Aziz" and "Samudra" are used like surnames, but neither of the other two words is.
_ _ Thus i am moving the article to Imam Samudra (only or primary full name in two refs), and piping the Cats (which affect only the alpha order on the Cat pages) with "Samudra, Imam". (But further evidence may justify something else.)--Jerzy•t 05:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  His name(s) re title & piping 

message: This article has no sources whatsoever for the claims about his ideology.  In addition, the comparison to American Christians is biased and pointless for this article.  This needs major cleanup. MezzoMezzo 14:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and objectivity

message: When is he due to be executed? This should be a good point to state.You (Wad) 14:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Execution? 
Talk:The Rose of Versailles (manga)

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support. It's a Japanese-language cartoon book. I read that part of it has been translated into English. This translation doesn't seem to have been so significant even for readers of English (the translation was marketed to Japanese speakers, or their parents or schools); and I note that the img file is of the Japanese. Thus the relationship of the English-language title to Berusaiyu no Bara seems very different from that of, say The Ruined Map to Moetsukita chizu. ¶ The title of this concoction is ベルサイユのばら. As I see it, one way to romanize this is "Versailles no bara" (which hasn't been proposed) and the other is "Berusaiyu no bara". So yes, change it to the latter. ¶ If its title were instead ザ・ローズ・オブ・ベルサイユ or similar, that would be a different story; but it isn't.  -- Hoary 09:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support. It's a Japanese-language cartoon book. I read that part of it has been translated into English. This translation doesn't seem to have been so significant even for readers of English (the translation was marketed to Japanese speakers, or their parents or schools); and I note that the img file is of the Japanese. Thus the relationship of the English-language title to Berusaiyu no Bara seems very different from that of, say The Ruined Map to Moetsukita chizu. ¶ The title of this concoction is ベルサイユのばら. As I see it, one way to romanize this is "Versailles no bara" (which hasn't been proposed) and the other is "Berusaiyu no bara". So yes, change it to the latter. ¶ If its title were instead ザ・ローズ・オブ・ベルサイユ or similar, that would be a different story; but it isn't.  -- Hoary 09:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: #Oppose Wikipedia:Naming conventions#use English "If you are talking about a person, country, town, film, or book, use the most commonly used English version of the name for the article." --Orange Mike 03:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in opposition to the move
Talk:Portuguese orthography

message: Note: this article on the Orthography of Portuguese was originally split from Portuguese alphabet. Previous discussions can be found at Talk: Portuguese alphabet. FilipeS 17:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussions

message: Is "l" sometimes pronounced "ł"? If so, it should be included in the footnotes of the chart. 24.91.9.206 00:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added it to the table, although it's an allophone of the regular L. FilipeS 12:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dark L

message: Why are these given separate cells in the diphthong chart if they have the same sound? — kwami (talk) 20:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  -em and -êm 

message: The Diacritics section of the page formerly stated that "São" is a short form of "Conceição." I don't think that's correct. "São" is the title for a named saint, e.g. São Francisco, São Paulo, etc. "Conceição" is a word meaning "conception" that is sometimes used as a name (e.g. Maria da Conceição de...), historically in reference to the conception of Jesus. While both can be religious terms, they are not related words. The são/ção idea may or may not be valid (I've never heard it before), but São/Conceição is not a valid example. I have edited the page to that effect. Please correct me if I am wrong. Shepshep 14:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  São and Conceição 

message: Compared to some other guides on-line, this article is pretty much useless. It's ill-structured, incomplete, confusing, lacking in examples and a general jumble.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.86.190 (talk) 23:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless article 

message: It would be nice to include capital versions of the diacritics. 2605:E000:2E52:FA00:BD2D:FAA:1713:2778 (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital diacritics 

message: In the section about etymological considerations there is a reference to certain instances of <oi> corresponding to Latin <ap> and <oc>. I’m familiar with the latter but not the former. Are there any examples of this?
--Oscararon (talk) 09:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound change from Latin ap to Portuguese oi? 

message: why portuguese lacks inverted question/exclamation mark?
although it can be freely used by portuguese speaking people around the world. 182.253.54.120 (talk) 15:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, see WP:TALKNO. Article talk pages are for discussing the state of their articles, not forums for general questions and chat. Anyway, there's only one language (Spanish) in the world, I believe, that uses the inverted marks. There's no more reason to ask why Portuguese doesn't than why English doesn't. Largoplazo (talk) 21:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No ⟨¿⟩ ⟨¡⟩.?