lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Monarchy of Finland

message: This article should be edited to meet with Wikipedia's formatting standards.  It should be in paragraph form.  Also, instead of saying "See ___," make a "See also" section. -PhattyFatt 00:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did that now. --Drieakko 04:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Anonymous user, kindly note WP:NPA. Please give references what are the "several records of ancient Finnish monarchs". A title is nominal if it has no administrative concept behind it. There was no specific administrative arrangement whatsoever for Finns who were fully governed under the King of Sweden. Thus "King of Finns" was only a nominal addition. --Drieakko 17:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

text: After not receiving any comments or references, I removed the claim about records of ancient Finnish kings. Also reworded the note about Charles IX's title to be more generally understandable. --Drieakko 12:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There certainly was a Kingdom of Finland.  Finland remained a monarchy until 1919. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.224.91.84 (talk) 07:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Edward Furlong

message: Can this be true? It looks like a hoax. Currently there is one, rather poor, source. If it was an impersonator, I guess it might still be notable, if there was wider media coverage. But we have no source for an impersonator. So perhaps it's safer to just remove it. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That is Furlong's official Twitter account. He used to sell memorabilia via the site. (165.120.240.74 (talk) 19:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Any source to support that claim? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Indeed. Though we should be grateful that he gives Churchill, Ike et al. a break, I have chosen to invoke WP:BMB. Favonian (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Adminship can be such a trial at times, I guess. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, the good old days! Favonian (talk) 20:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I can never remember Leonard Sachs being quite so devious? Amazing what you can find rambling around Bury St. Eds. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donations for liver transplant on Twitter 
Talk:MechCommander

message: Sniper cannon?- I played the game a lot, but i never saw a sniper cannon, a "sniper" weapon aught to be long range and not medium, and its name is very unlike battletech as descirbes a tactical concept (snipe warfare) rather then a technological concept (i.e Particle Projection cannon) general description (i.e long range missle) or code name(i.e thunderbolt, long tom).
: There is a Sniper Cannon weapon in Desperate Measures expansion, it is available for IS only and is, essentially, a medium-range Long Tom. It is considered canon as it has been featured in tabletop Battletech games already. Erratic Communist 13:12, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Sniper Cannon is an artillery cannon found in the, lol, canon of Battletech.  It's accessible in game only through the Desperate Measures expansion, and requires the cheat: hereitcomes.  (I think, it's been a while since I've played this game.)  Also, is that Erratic Communist of the infamous ERRATIC FEATHERED CACTUS clan? --Acetyl (talk) 02:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MechCommander 2

message: How do you compile the game with the source code and assets? MisterCheese 17:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was wondering if the stub tag can be removed from this article, IMHO it already provides all the information needed. As comparison, original MechCommander article contains about the same amount of info and isn't a stub. 81.198.69.93 20:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove stub?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/General weaponry discussion

message: It has come to my attention that this WikiProject uses the same color as astronomical objects (e.g. planets) in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomical Objects taxobox. I would like to suggest changing it (even to a different shade of pink) so that each color is used in only one table. Since I think there are more astronomical object tables than weapon tables, it would be easier to change these than those. I will do the change myself if no one else wants to (though tell me what color you want, or I'll just pick one). See Wikipedia:Taxobox. Tuf-Kat 03:38, Feb 5, 2004 (UTC)
----
:I don't really think the project is ready for this.  The weaponry pages don't have any sense of order or particular style.  Each and every one has a different style.  Once a particular system has been cemented, I could see this happening, just not now.  Maclyn611 04:40, 8 May 2004 (UTC)

message: I've moved Wikipedia:WikiProject Weaponry to the Inactive section of the WikiProject page, as it hasn't been edited since Nov 1st; I wanted to let you all know, and ask if you're still working on it.  If so, feel free to move it back up into the active section. JesseW 08:22, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still active? 

message: The article Napoleonic Wars has been listed to be improved on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. You can add your vote there if you would like to support the article.--Fenice 06:42, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement Drive

message: I've looked for pages to link to this stublet Lebanese unload. This popular Middle-Eastern pastime may be relevant. JFW | T@lk 00:08, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lebanese unload 

message: I have been working with a few others on some changes to the ammunition pages. I'd like to know if anyone is presently active on this project. Avriette 16:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The project has been pretty inactive, but I try and check in.  I've been busy with WP:Ships for the most parts, but its only a stone's throw away.  Is there a project associated with ammo?  If not, it would be a good thing to have that be included here.  Josh 21:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I keep an eye on it.  Most of the recent discussion related to this has been tanks on Talk:Tank. --Carnildo 07:47, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inactivity 

message: I have created Wikipedia:WikiProject_Weaponry/Categories to handle category-related guidelines, which I think we are lacking.  I have made an initial proposal there, and I have moved category-related talk to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Weaponry/Categories as well.  Please comment and help improve the guide!  Josh 19:05, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Dune 2000

message: Just to point out, the Harkonnen do not get the Sardukar as units. Any side can, but only if you capture the Emperor's Palace in the last 3 campaign missions. User:Green01 10:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you download the 1.06 patch, in Multiplayer modes you can produce them from the barracks after building a hi-tech factory Oddity- 06:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sardukar 

message: When you've destroyed all the enemy windtraps, the enemy rocket turrets no longer function. In multiplayer VS AI controlled opponents, when you've destroyed 100% of the AI player's offensive units and ability to construct more offensive units (ie, you've destroyed or captured all the AI's Construction Yards and it has no turrets or armed vehicles or Starport or MCV) it will quit the game and destroy all of its remaining buildings. If you're planning to capture AI buildings, get it done before you've trashed its ability to attack. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 12:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay info 

message: Hello everyone. I noticed the cleanup tag and decided to try to lend a hand. Hope you like the way it turns out. This is also my first contribution to Wikipedia. Cheers,
LJ-38M (talk) 10:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Dune 2000 page 

message: I expanded the article alot, all it needs now are citations. ¤IrønCrøw¤ (Speak to Me) 21:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded 

message: Dune 2000 didn't have an incredibly long list of patches. Maybe a section on changes from the original to the final patch should be fine? Up to other editors. ¤IrønCrøw¤ (Speak to Me) 17:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  May want to add patch information.
Talk:Carangidae

message: I got redirected here from "trevally"; I understand that the name can be used for many of the fish in this family, but which is the ordinary trevally that we eat?  Surely that is what most people looking it up on WP are looking for, and there's no guidance here, with a list of 100 or more fish, most red-linked, and many inedible or non-commercial.  Zsero 19:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the name trevally is used for a variety of genera on this page, but there is no 'ordinary trevally', as the predominant species varies from region to region. For example, in Southern Australia or New Zealand, if someone goes out to catch trevally, they are only after the white trevally, as it is the only 'trevally' in these regions. However, those in northern Australia could equally be targeting Golden, Giant, Bigeye, Turrum or Bluefin Trevally, as they are equally common. My knowledge of the rest of the carangidae's distribution is poor at best, but i would guess that there is no one species in any of these areas that is commonly targeted. Furthermore, when you buy trevally from market, it's most likely going to be a mix of species, as many similar species are not differentiated between in a professional catch. You can not pin down a single 'trevally' species (or genus in fact) that is used worldwide. By the way, all of the carangidae are very edible and the only reason they wouldn't be commercial is because populations exist in small numbers. Larger trevallies do carry ciguatera, but small fish are still eaten. I would suggest that a seperate page for the "trevallies" be made and links to all the species commonly called a trevally. Cheers Kare Kare 01:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial Trevally?
Talk:Crevalle jack

message: Is this the species featured in BBC "Blue Plant 2" catching birds? 95.151.208.119 (talk) 10:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Query birds
Talk:Greenback horse mackerel

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 10:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Koheru

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Leatherjacket fish

message: Should add fish has venomous fin tips 208.103.136.182 (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venomous 

message: We have them in Australia. Clearly leatherjackets are not Amerocentric. They not only have a retractable poisonous dorsal spike but also a patchwork of numerous small toxic spurs near the tailfin. This article needs to reflect the geolocation as not limited to the Americas but I lack proper resources other than 'local knowledge'. Wokepedian (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my mistake. The Australian leatherjacket fish is a different species - Meuschenia scaber - not Oligoplites saurus. Wokepedian (talk) 14:39, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution
Talk:Pacific jack mackerel

message: *In Mackerel's Plunder, Hints of Epic Fish Collapse by Mort Rosenblum and Mar Cabra January 25, 2012 New York Times ... "An eight-country investigation of the fishing industry in the southern Pacific by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists shows how the fate of the jack mackerel may foretell the progressive collapse of fish stocks in all oceans."
Includes link http://www.iwatchnews.org/node/7900/  (Center for Public Integrity)   99.35.12.74 (talk) 04:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Overfishing]] resource 
Talk:Pilot fish

message: The lead paragraph describes the pilot fish as a "carnivorous commensal fish", but the description section describes at length the mutually beneficial relationships it has with it's "hosts", even specifically saying: 
:The pilot fish's relationship with sharks is a mutualist one; the pilot fish gains protection from predators, while the shark gains freedom from parasites.
This seems contradictory. The Brittanica online article on commensalism mentions pilot fish, so I'm not sure which way this should go. catParade 15:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commensal or Mutualistic 

message: I feel that a photo of the actual fish would be better in the taxobox than a drawing.SuperPayara123 (talk) 03:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly, though, such a photograph should show the/a fish clearly, which is why the current photograph on the page is not used as the taxobox photo.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxobox Picture 

message: In reference to this quote: "These observations have led to the pilot fish's distinctive markings being copied for decals supplied as shark protection for surfboards
Is there evidence this actually works? I thought sharks had poor vision, but after a quick Google search I guess they might have better vision than previously thought. 
Anyway, if there are no studies showing this works at a shark deterrent, I feel like we probably shouldn't include it here, otherwise it comes across as a advertising for the company described in the source. In fact I'm leaning toward thinking this might be covert advertisement. If it really does work, a real study would be preferable to a news article promoting a specific product Pythagimedes (talk) 19:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surfboard decals - covert advertisement?
Talk:Samson fish

message: The drawing included here is obviously of a mahi mahi (Coryphaenea hippurus), not of a sampsonfish.  Please bear this in mind when using this article to identify fish.
 
Really it shouldn't be included here. It is misleading The Catcher 09:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: "It is found in the Indo-Pacific Oceans to eastern Northland in Australia. It is not found anywhere in New Zealand."
The Northland Linked is in New Zealand and I could not find a Northland Australia. 2.59.123.120 (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Yellowtail kingfish

message: I don't think there are any valid subspecies for this species. From memory the Seriola lalandi lalandi  label was part of a range of subspecies assigned to yellowtail kingfish populations by some sport fishing organisation. Yellowtail kingfish should just be referred to as Seriola lalandi (www.fishbase.org).
Damian MoranDamian 2000 08:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Spot on, they are just disjunct populations of Seriola lalandi, nothing more.  Kare Kare 10:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  scientific name for yellowtail kingfish 

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Miguel Grau Seminario

message: Check out es:Miguel Grau Seminario, we have alot of content to work from guys. Good luck.--Jersey Devil 02:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you please provide source citation for this letter? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 11:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Since there aren't many English language resources describing the life of Miguel Grau, I included a Spanish language one.
British English has been detected on this page and is the de facto standard for this page, in accordance with Wikipedia Policies.190.43.195.158 16:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Should we just translate the Spanish version of the page into English?  It's got a lot of information and seems pretty legit to me. Jamiltonio (talk) 03:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: Hi all, in addition to missing inline citations, the few references listed relate to ships rather than biographies; so it's unclear how these support the text in the article. Can anyone please help here? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 11:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Pacific rudderfish

message: It is also eaten in Korea, where it is called 샛돔.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.225.34.194 (talk) 05:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korea 

message: Steamed or pan fried?!? Have you seen how tender this fish is? Sushi only. :p 69.165.246.119 (talk) 03:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blasphemy! 

message: If this sentence "The Japanese butterfish prefers tropical waters: around 32°N–23°N." is saying that the butterfish likes water that is between 32 degrees on the Newton scale, and 23 degrees on the Newton scale, I think it is an error. As far as I know, 33 degrees Newton is the boiling point of water 212 F and 100 C, and even 23 Newton is 157.45 Fahrenheit, 69.7 Celsius. I am unaware of any fish that is not considered "cuisine" at these temperatures.
--DTVillanova (talk) 03:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temperature???
Talk:Pelagic butterfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 10:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed