lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dia de Los Dangerous!

message: You know, I could have sworn Dr. Girlfriend was reading "Memoirs of a Geisha", not "Beyond Good and Evil".
:Review the episode, and if you're right then change the article. But please verify first. - DynSkeet *  Talk 12:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  much too late, and not in the article anymore, but definitely Memoirs of a Geisha.208.38.59.161 (talk) 03:44, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reading

message: I don't have the reference but in one of the commentaries, Jackson Publick or Doc Hammer mention how Dr. Girlfriend accidentally has an adam's apple in this despite their intentions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.187.77.211 (talk) 02:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional goof?
Talk:The Bonfire of the Vanities (film)

message: I just watched this film and Rev. Bacon was most certainly a character in it. Why does this article state he was removed... And for that matter not even credit him in the cast box?
ṢṚṃḍşŢ³↑Ò  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.242.191 (talk) 03:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Bacon?

message: Most of the unsourced content can be found word-for-word on the film's IMDb trivia page. the question is, which writing came first? Matuko (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDb
Talk:Gurre-Lieder

message: I'm curious as to what evidence there is that the principal influence on Gurre-lieder is Mahler.  I don't see that, and I don't believe that Schoenberg had come under Mahler's influence as of 1901.  He and Zemlinsky attended a rehearsal for the 3rd symphony (1902), and became Mahlerian converts at that time.  I'd say the clearest influence on Gurre-lieder is that of Wagner--especially "Tristan".  To a lesser extent, one might argue for the influence of his teacher and musical confidant Zemlinsky, but Wagner is the obvious candidate.
Museslave
I've made the two references to Mahler as a definite influence more debatable. (The one about instrumentation is more convincing than the general stylistic one). I've also removed the comment that by 1910 he had 'developed his theories about atonality'. He had composed the first 'atonal' works, certainly, but had at that point little theory to back his practice - that came later. Cenedi (talk) 13:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How would you basically define the (obvious) difference between Wagner and Mahler influence? -- megA (talk) 11:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Has Schönberg ever talked about why he chose to score it for such a huge orchestra?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.138.66 (talk) 23:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why such a huge orchestra?

message: Added the Interlude as Part 1, No.11 and corrected some german orthography
--Michael Petersen (talk) 15:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Orchestral Interlude in Part 1 missing & some minor formatting issues

message: The orchestra alone is 150, which would leave 40 for the large chorus AND the three male choruses together. That can't be right. 250 to 300 seems more likely. -- megA (talk) 12:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The choruses have to compete with the large orchestra, so a size of about 250 for large chorus as well as for the male chorus wouldn't be far off, IMO. Oh, as I see I wrote that already. -- megA (talk) 11:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  190 persons on stage? 

message: I'm confused about Part Two. Is there one song in it (that is poorly formatted), or did someone just replace the list with some random German? Helixer (hábleme) 01:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "The brief second part consists of just one song in which the bereft and distraught Waldemar accuses God of cruelty". Or at least, that is what it says in the article.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 01:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part Two?? 

message: Why is the title hyphenated? Every other source (including the Universal Edition score) has "Gurrelieder" (without a hyphen). 2A02:1810:2423:3700:5C39:4195:5DA1:A64E (talk) 20:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphenation ?
Talk:Multimagic square

message: Order either needs to be defined or the proper "order" linked to. Hackwrench 08:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order 

message: I propose that trimagic square and tetramagic square be merged into multimagic square.  I'm not sure about bimagic square.   We have very little to say about them.  I have no objection to the text being merged as separate sections. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added bimagic square; although there is something to be said about it, the article with that information still wouldn't be very long.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 00:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 or 4
Talk:Tri Nations

message: I suggested a new move, see Talk:Rugby Union Tri Nations.  Yorkshire Phoenix (talk • contribs) 10:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New move 

message: I love my league as much as the next guy (go the Raiders!) but to have the Tri Nations and Rugby League Tri Nations as equals is, frankly, a joke. For a start the Rugby League Tri Nations does not even exist anymore, was around for a shorter amount of time and is much, much less popular. They are both great sports and moving the Union page to "Tri Nations" is not a slight against league - its just accepting the reality that one tournament is vastly more important than the other. 130.56.87.136 (talk) 00:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What a Joke
Talk:Government of India Act 1858

message: Some of the phrasing here should be altered to include the fact that Burma (Lower and Upper) were each at one point part of the Raj.Naraht (talk) 14:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burma? 

message: involment in Council of Governer Gen. 2409:4054:102:2AA4:0:0:1E64:B8A0 (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  non official members.
Talk:Pachypodium ambongense

message: The article has changed much since tagged. Still needs work, but I can't ID anything specific. May need expert, tagged as such. --meatclerk 08:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, it's best to leave the cleanup tag; an article at the end of the cleanup queue is likely to get attention soon.  Note that cleanup tags should be replaced only where the article's problems are better summed up by a specific tag; in this case, the article needs good old fashioned all-around cleanupping. I have reverted the retagging. --RobthTalk 03:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Timecop

message: I just watched this film again, was struck by a couple of good performances from minor characters, was wondering who they were. (The black guy who does the briefing is excellent (Scott Lawrence), the side-kick cop is good (Gloria Reuben), and the console nerd is quite believable.) 
Then I read Roger Ebert's review, a good part of which focuses on the film's paradoxes. It makes you wonder. Does this guy think time travel is based on real physical laws? It's a little strange that he notices some "problems" but seems unaware there are a host of other ones.
The only thing striking me as grossly unbelievable and painful was the engine flames coming from the back of the time launch vehicle. If they were moving at any speed, they would have appeared almost horizontal, but they were lazily moving toward the ceiling.
The acting he should have picked on was Mia Sara's, which seemed stereotyped.
24.130.9.210 (talk) 12:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Since when aren't there holes in time travel plots?

message: Timecop '94 is a comic book limited series published by Dark Horse Comics that was served as an alternate continuation of Timecop (1994), while ignoring the events of Timecop 2: The Berlin Decision (2003). 24.111.55.7 (talk) 14:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic book continuation
Talk:Battle of Acosta Ñu

message: I'm changing the title of López on every article from Dictator to President since that was his actual Title. The perception (emphasis on perception) of him back then and even more so now is not sufficient motives to change it to dictator since that wouldn't be an objective rendering of facts but a subjective one since we are attributing (thus changing their real ones) titles according to what we think or beleive and nto accordign to what it was. I have most paraguayan articles I edit in my watch list so if anyone wants to discuss abotu this please write in teh discussion page or in my own talk page and I'll be more than glad and willing to talk and try to arrive to an amicable concensus. Veritiel (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  López Title 

message: Remove, as the picture is 35 years and 5000 kilometers away! Check same picture:  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thousand_Days_War.jpg
Original can be found here: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ucbk.ark:/28722/h2361h;view=1up;seq=50  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.23.13 (talk) 20:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Child soldiers picture is from the One Thousand Days War (1899-1902) in Colombia & Panama!
Talk:Battle of Ban Me Thuot

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 09:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Hi, good work so far. I have undertaken a light copy edit of the article. There were a number of tense issues (for instance switching between past and present tense). I believe I have found most of them, but may have missed some. As such, I would suggest before taking it further, that you might try to get someone from the Guild of Copy Editors to go through the article. I have a couple of other suggestions for improvement:
* is there any way that the infobox can be tweaked so that is divided evenly down the middle? Currently, the South Vietnamese side is wider than the North Vietnamese and looks a little lopsided;
* the References should be presented as surname, first name, e.g. Dawson, Alan;
* is there a year/date of publication for the Dawson source?
* ISBN or OCLC numbers could be added for the References. These can be found at www.worldcat.org or Google books;
* in the Notes, the style is a little inconsistent, for instance sometimes you have "pp." for multiple pages (e.g. "Duong Hao, pp. 149–151), but then later you use "pp." for single pages (e.g. "Nguyen Van Bieu, pp.292"). I'd suggest just using "p." for single pages and "pp." for multiple page ranges. This seems to be the standard at A or FA. 
Anyway, keep up the good work. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments for further improvements

message: That looks more like T-62 than T-54. Note the shape of the turret.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.187.241.4 (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ID of the Tank in the picture
Talk:Colegio San Agustin – Biñan

message: This school programs the different occassions for the special talents of all. As for me, I am a student there. Nutritious food is served there. CSA also accepts foreign students. The parents are also a part of the Augustinian Family.
:I edited the entry above. Corrected some incorrect English grammar. Kguirnela 05:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Whatnot

message: There seems to be some confusion regarding the OFFICIAL name of the school. Please cite your source if it is really Southwoods; if not, I shall revert all references back to Biñan.
Kguirnela 01:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colegio San Agustin-Biñan ''OR'' Colegio San Agustin-Southwoods?

message: Colegio San Agustin-Biñan is the official name not Colegio San Agustin-Southwoods. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bernicolet (talk • contribs).
:Bingo. =) Kguirnela 07:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSA-Biñan 

message: Feel free to edit just do not remove important contents of this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernicolet (talk • contribs) 04:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please take not that this is an encyclopedia. Non-notable elements are not supposed to be included. Neither is it appropriate to use Wikipedia as your soapbox. And please adhere to Wikipedia conventions. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 04:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DO NOT REMOVE IMPORTANT CONTENTS

message: I would like to ask, in your non-teaching department list of employees, is the designation of each employees official? As per observation some of them seems to have the rank of a Priest administrators especially those who has "HEAD" on their titles, Thank you. -CSAlumni-  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.133.205 (talk) 00:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 04:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DESIGNATION OF EMPLOYEES

message: Are you the author of this article? are you wikipedia's staff or agent?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.133.204 (talk) 01:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am a Wikipedian, if that is what you are driving at. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 09:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kguirnela
Talk:Battle of Barbalissos

message: The source Shadows in the Desert says the commander was Philip the Arab, not Valerian. The source seems wrong however since Philip was no longer in power, Kaveh Faroukh and the Shapur Kaba Zartusht both state “…Caesar [Phillip] lied again and did wrong to Armenia. We [Shapur and his army] marched against the Roman Empire and annihilated his army of 60,000 men at Barbalissos”.(Shapur Kaba Zartusht) in Appendix 4, 1984).
.216.121.242.162 (talk) 01:17, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

message: Erich B Anderson, "Cataphracts: Knights of the Ancient Eastern Empires". Anderson's website states he has a BA in history.
DK publishing, "The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Warfare". Main contributors appear to be just authors.
Neither source is written by someone with a specialization in this field. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:36, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable sources 

message: Very loosely related material from different epochs plus some irrelevant material like "During the life of Roman empire, many great architectures and historical entertainment places such as the coliseum were made for people and nobles of Rome". No prelude. This is one of the most important battles; it deserves a much better article--Dipa1965 (talk) 08:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "History" section is problematic, prelude and details on the battle itself are badly missing
Talk:Battle of Charleston (1862)

message: I changed the title from Battle of Charleston, WV to Battle of Charleston (1862) as the state of West Virginia (WV) did not exist in 1862. Charleston was still a part of Virginia at the time. I will make additional edits shortly, and will add this to the main article, West Virginia in the Civil War.  Scott Mingus 21:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that West Virginia became its own entity and no longer part of Virginia after the Wheeling Conventions of 1861, thought it was not officially admitted to the US until 1863.  At least, that's what our article on West Virginia suggests.--Mojo Hand (talk) 17:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

text: No, it was still Virginia and treated as such by Congress and the President.Dubyavee (talk) 20:46, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change
Talk:Chemical colitis

message: Good article, needs expansion.  Many other medications reported, including NSAIDs -- Samir   धर्म 09:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Need to literature search a bit first.  There's a lot that can be added -- Samir   धर्म 10:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs expansion
Talk:Tuxpan

message: No vital information
Please add population, area, and other information referring to the economy, demographics, tourst sites, physical geography.  Please consult Enciclopedia de los Municipios de Mexico and INEGI. Vogensen 09:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mallee Highway

message: We seem to have a disagreement as to whether the road from the Murray Valley Highway to Balranald is either the Mallee Highway or route 12. Street-directory.com.au shows the Mallee Highway coming into Balranald. I don't have a photo and can't remember what any roadsigns say at either the Sturt or Murray Valley Highways, but thought it was signposted as the Mallee Highway from the Murray Valley Hwy end. If it's not the Mallee Highway, does it have a more interesting name than "Balranald-Tooleybuc Road, highway 12"? --Scott Davis Talk 09:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where does it end?
Talk:Nudelman-Rikhter NR-23

message: Nanchang Q-5 points to this article, calling the cannon "Norinco Type 23-2K 23 mm". If Norinco builds a version, this should be mentioned here. Rl 09:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Norinco?

message: There is another Wikipedia entry that seems to describe the same weapon:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rikhter_R-23
Please check this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.64.217.19 (talk) 14:29, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A double entry?
Talk:Psion Series 5

message: I've always heard this handheld referred to as the Psion Series 5, not the Psion 5. Psion Series 5 redirects to this article, but I think this should be swapped, so that the real article title is Psion Series 5 and the redirect goes the other way. Any objections? Pelago 09:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Psion Series 5 is also the official name. As there haven't been any objections in the months since your comment, I've moved the page (and fixed some double redirects). --Safalra 15:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psion 5 vs Psion Series 5 

message: I think the 5MX did not use the CL-PS7110. That SoC is cannot run at 36MHz according to available datasheets, and the memory map also seems off. Does anyone know anything about this?
2601:400:C000:E0A1:A927:3490:531B:EB6 (talk) 05:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  5MX processor?
Talk:HMS Stygian

message: * Article needs image and references. — ERcheck (talk) 15:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments

message: * The article says the boat was scrapped at Ardgour (Scotland).  The given coordinates for this object (today) are just offshore of the tiny Malaysian island of Pulau Perak. Reasoning?? Twang (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Location?
Talk:Battle of Cape Spartel (1936)

message: *Olnyly 2 destroyers in Republican Side (Almirante Antequera and Gravina)
*In Rebbel side, 1 heavy cruiser (Canarias, with 10000 tons standard, more of 13.000 full load) and one light cruiser (cervera, with 9280 tons full load, same class libertad (battle of cape Cherchel) and Miguel de Cervantes)
sorry for my short english... for this, i dont edit datas here--217.15.37.209 (talk) 08:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  more datas in: :es:Batalla del Cabo Espartel (1936) Spanish light Cruiser Almirante Cervera
sorry for my short english...--Takashi kurita (talk) 08:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: incorrect datas
Talk:Mohammad Bawazir

message: I looked for Mohammad Bawazir in the full official list, now that it has been released.
He wasn't there, at least under that spelling.
But Yasim Muhammed Basardah seemed pretty close.  It is within the window of non-standard transliterations the DoD uses.  So I merged the two articles.  
After merging I read the transcripts from his CSRT and ARB hearing.  They show a guy who went to Afghanistan, to fight, and appears to have decided to answer his interrogators as fully and completely as possible.  The Newspaper articles that the older article is based on describe a guy who participated in a 140 day hunger strike.  He would have been participating in his hunger strike when he was called before his ARB hearing.  There is no sign of that in his hearing.
I am wonder if the merge was well advised after all.
If the newspaper articles describe the same guy as the transcripts what could have prompted his hunger strike?  Could it have been caused by a lack of respect by the American authorities?  Did they remove him from Camp 5, where he was subjected to regular beatings, and death threats by unrepentant jihadists?  Was he pissed off because American intelligence authorities made up a bunch of bullshit boiler-plate allegations. even though he had put his life on the line to be completely candid, and had informed on senior jihadist leaders, including OBL?  --  Geo Swan 09:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:Toad (instrumental)

message: The last sentence of the intro paragraph is a bit of ambiguous writing that erroneously has Toad being "common in jazz": Although common in jazz, "Toad" is one of the earliest drum solos recorded by a rock group. I've reworded it. rowley (talk) 06:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that is better. I've copyedited the last sentence: "drum solo(s)" was repeated three times in the last two sentences. —Bruce1eetalk 07:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. I further edited, leaving out the word "solo", as it made the sentence sound like all solos, not just drums, and this way continues your streamlining and by omission of the word, makes it clearer that we're speaking about drum solos.rowley (talk) 03:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, "Toad" has already been identified as a drum solo, so there's no need to say "solo" (or "drum solo"). Thanks. —Bruce1eetalk 07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewording
Talk:Giovanni Battista Viotti

message: so it reads like actual English?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.159.28 (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Can someone PLEASE edit this

message: The extensive details of the modern history of the violin belong at Viotti Stradivarius --Wetman 09:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text of the article says one birthdate; the text under the picture says a different birthdate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.207.44 (talk) 01:27, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not any more, it seems 176.127.211.50 (talk) 18:33, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Birthdates 

message: The Italian wikipedia contains a (complete) work list. It would be worth adapting it to English. 18:33, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: See https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Battista_Viotti#Opere 176.127.211.50 (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work list 
Talk:Battle of Elizabeth City

message: PKKloeppel (talk) 13:53, 12 July 2008 (UTC)