lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fremantle (company)

message: According to www.freemantlemedia.com, the company is called FreemantleMedia, not Freemantle Media. This page should be renamed to reflect that. — 81.132.3.232 21:08, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant Fremantle, not Freemantle. Whatever, point still stands. — 81.132.3.232 21:12, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page. Anyone looking for "Fremantle Media" will be redirected to "FremantleMedia." Iowahwyman 18:08, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier discussion

message: I have asked Fremantle to update their own company information as the current text is just a copy of the about us from the web siteBlenx 13:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would violate WP:COI if the article needs to be cleaned up then it should be done an editor following WP:STYLE, WP:RS and WP:V policies Gnangarra 13:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FremantleMedia Update 

message: Reverting legitimate articles with web page material is considered to be WP:Vandalism SatuSuro 14:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NOTE

message: To any one editing this page - take note of what is written in the following post - Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-02-05/Astroturfing Wikipedia SatuSuro 04:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reminder

message: There needs to be a Critisizm section. From what I heard, FremantleMedia has been critisized by many Goodson-Todman game show fans because Fremantle has been changing the formats; therefore lowering that show's ratings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.240.204.117 (talk) 01:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Critisizm Section 

message: How did the name, "Fremantle" come about? Is it related to the city?203.171.199.103 (talk) 08:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost 5 years later, this still isn't explained. 91.84.84.173 (talk) 16:55, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The Name

message: I saw this in the article:
"FremantleMedia has an outstanding global network with operations in 25 countries. We create over 8,500 hours of programming a year, roll out more than 60 formats and air 400 programmes a year worldwide. Our distribution arm FremantleMedia International also distributes more than 20,000 hours of content in over 200 territories."
This makes me think that FremantleMedia possibly edited the page to reflect its business interests. It also expelled the taste of neutrality when reading this article.
Goose2000 (talk) 00:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral point of view? 

message: This article should merge with Pearson television. 69.92.186.111 (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Pearson Television]]
Talk:How Clean Is Your House?

message: All the 'official' stuff I can find says it's called How Clean Is Your House? (note capital I). This page should be renamed. — 81.132.3.232 21:17, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Capital I

message: I can't say I've ever heard anyone even talk about this, let alone just refer to them as "Kim and Aggie". I've heard of "Too Posh To Wash", but I can't say I knew of the presenters.
* They appeared on an episode of Gordon Ramsay's The F-Word, and I heard him refer to them as "Kim and Aggie" on there. Wilybadger 00:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kim and Aggie"? 

message: This page is out of date.  Series 6 has started with a different format.  They revisit subjects from past seasons to see if they have kept it up.  They repeat nearly the entire original show with a few minutes at the end of the revisit. Caligulathegod (talk) 00:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 6 

message: we want both of you back !  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.46.162.234 (talk) 10:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  kim and aggie 

message: This bit needs some fixing -- it looks like some sort of translation or language difference there.
198.53.208.116 (talk) 03:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated series?
Talk:University of Alabama

message: This part of the article is largely unsourced; the references are only to other lists or handbooks and don't convey information of encyclopedic value. There are great Wikipedia pages which list Greek life at any given university or college; this is not the place for them. I propose deletion. --Melchior2006 (talk) 19:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one chimed in on this one, I will go ahead and streamline. --Melchior2006 (talk) 07:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek life 

message: @ElKevbo, it seems like you are engaging in an editing war. Rather than engaging with my dialogue on the Talk section of the University of Arkansas page, you are reverting my edits made on other pages. Please revert your most recent edit and reach a consensus there. LoudPorcupine797 (talk) 13:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: One revert is not an edit war. But making edits that you know that multiple editors have objected to and add large tables of new information that violate WP:UNIGUIDE, WP:NOT, and WP:DUE is disruptive. ElKevbo (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

text: I agree with ElKevbo; this table is way too detailed, not sufficiently referenced, and the information is not of value to an encyclopedia. --Melchior2006 (talk) 13:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Listing these details for student leaders seems odd (out of scope etc.) given that the University President (and past ones) are only listed in article with other leaders not listed at all. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So how about we expand it! LoudPorcupine797 (talk) 16:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Government Leaders
File talk:ManzanitaTreeBranches wb.jpg

message: I think this image is a Pacific Madrone. I'll have to find my McMinn and Mano to be sure. Gentgeen 21:32, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dang, you might be right. I'm trying to find info/photos on the web to match up.  But I'm not finding matching photos at edu or similar sites; they're all photographer sites! Here's some:   .  Elf | Talk 01:57, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Mick the Miller

message: When I get time I will move this article to a Great greyhounds article, add more greyhounds and get rid of the Greyhound Hall of Fame category; I think this would make more sense. Any comments? Notjim 21:34, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No Way this was my familys dog!!
relative of charles kempton  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.36.255 (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Keep as a separate article and expand if possible. Albatross2147 (talk) 13:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Duloxetine

message: this page should be 100% fact 78.147.32.166 (talk) 14:08, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  duloxetine 

message: I agree with your deletion of a reference at Special:Diff/1210170375, however, I don't agree with your reason you specified in the edit summary (Deleted a reference because it was not in English). I feel that just deleting a reference because it was not in English is not justified. When I visited that URL, I found information about knee pain with osteoarthritis, but I didn't find any information about duloxetine, so the deletion is justifiable. We could find an older version of this article via a web archive when it might be about duloxetine, but this source will unlikely meet the criteria of WP:MEDRS, so it is better to find a source that is definitely WP:MEDRS. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 12:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok Thomasbeem (talk) 00:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted a reference because it was not in English
Talk:Marine expeditionary unit

message: USMC Tactical Recovery of Aircraft and Personnel ought to have it's own page and not a redirect here. With a good deal of history (Operation Eagle Claw, Scott O'Grady, and recently Operation Odyssey Dawn rescue of F-15E pilot at a minimum there's plenty of subject matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.116.149.9 (talk) 02:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRAP deserves it's own page 

message: I have proposed that we merge the List of Marine Expeditionary Units into a subheader of Marine Expeditionary Unit. The list is so short that it isn't a strong standalone list. However, it would add to the MEU article by adding a bit more depth, as well as some color. bahamut0013♠♣ 22:17, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Do it when able.--23:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I suggest some smart person, not me, edit this article for your little middle-school sister or brother to read. GeorgeLouis (talk) 03:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too complicated. 
Talk:FC Barcelona

message: Please change captain name 2409:40E3:1025:341A:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 11:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. EphemeralPerpetuals (they/them)talk 13:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2024 

message: Globally, the FC Barcelona between the male and female teams, added 2 trebles, in which is the first football team in the world in add 2 trebles. Lmpesantezt (talk) 20:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is only for male section. 213.143.48.233 (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treble. 

message: Officially, Xavi Hernández is the FC Barcelona head coach until 30 June 2024 (in addition, tomorrow there is still a match versus Sevilla FC that he will lead) yet. Regardless of whether FC Barcelona makes Hansi Flick official (surely it will be so according to the news in the sports newspapers), Hansi Flick will not officially be the head coach until 1 July 2024, which is when the new season begins. As can be seen in FC Barcelona's official Xavi statement: "He will cease to be head coach at the end of the season" (and not immediately). So please, don't remove Xavi until 1 July 2024.
Official statement:  213.143.48.233 (talk) 21:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't remove Xavi (as head coach) until 1 July!
Talk:Consumer economy

message: Totally POV, with zero factual information.  This has the potential to be a pretty good page, but right now it's garbage.Lebob 23:07, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There were no redeeming features to the original, so I overwrote it with a minimal stub. Pcb21| Pete 21:03, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone find an academic source, preferably an economics textbook, which explains what the term "consumer economy" means?
:Consumer spending and its trends, as opposed to producer purchases not including services? EllenCT (talk) 00:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What does it mean?

message: Here are some ideas for sources you can use to improve the article. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 01:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source ideas 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ruizhouruizhou (talk) 03:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu
Talk:Bhagavata Purana

message: In the commentary section, Sridhara Swami is claimed to be an Advaitist. However, this wrong. Sridhar Swami is the opposite and is highly revered by the opponents of Advaita Vada and is respected as a Vaisnava. The great Caitanya Mahaprabhu greatly respected Sridhara Svami, and Caitanya was known for His highly inimical attitude towards the Advaitists for being crypto-Buddhist atheists. van Lustig (talk) 21:41, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sridhara Swami is not an Advaitist
Category talk:India geography stubs

message: (Copied from Wikipedia:Help wanted): ...I noticed that many of the :Category:India geography stubs articles are some of the most shockingly written I've seen. Unwikified, ungrammatical, unpunctuated, and poorly translated. I'll list their names on the category's talk page. Simply stike through any you check, please.  Grutness|hello?  05:14, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikifying and cleaning up (Help wanted project)
Talk:Healthcare in the United States

message: — Assignment last updated by Nathan.brenn (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice

message: I plan on adding to the "History" section as well as the "Impact of drug companies" subsection (primarily with current initiatives taken both by federal legislation as well as more state-wide programs). I also will be cleaning up the "Demographic differences" section to make certain sentences more concise and overall provide more clarity to remain centralized to the main topic of the article. Mkaddache (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding to History & Impact of drug companies, Cleaning up Demographic differences
Talk:List of people from Maryland

message: If you include the twins of Good Charlotte, than shouldn't you include the other members that are also from Maryland like Billy Martin and Paul Thomas?
It seems this list includes even people who have briefly lived in Maryland, like Oprah.  Oprah is not from Maryland.  That's why we still have crabs in the bay. Taco325i 01:29, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion criteria
Talk:Lee

message: The people and places sections need to be split off into their own articles and Lee (English name) should merge with the people section in this article under Lee (name). ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 06:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When I came here, the people section has already been dealt with. I strongly disagree with the moving of place names, except for all "Lee Counties", which I removed/swapped for a working link to Lee County. I therefore removed the split notice as well. (see more below) – sgeureka t•c 23:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split/merge 

message: This disambiguation page was marked for cleanup. I removed the following entries:
* Lee, one of the original common Hmong surnames (no mention of this surname on the Hmong pages)
* Lee (middle name) (speedied)
* from the see also section:
** Leesburg, Leesville, Leeton (per MOS:DAB, no risk of confusion)
** "Annabel Lee", a poem by Edgar Allan Poe (also no risk of confusion).
– sgeureka t•c 23:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Most SNP

message: Should this page be at New Bridge?  dbenbenn | talk 02:01, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title?

message: New Bridge now redirects here. --Ondrejsv 18:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect

message: Minimal referencing and would better go as a subsection of the article about the bridge. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Being BOLD and carrying out the merger on grounds that nobody will oppose. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 14:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[UFO (restaurant)]]
Talk:Saitama Prefecture

message: Is there a town/village in Kodama District, Saitama named Misato?  The list under the district includes a link to the city of Misato, Saitama.  If there is also a village/town, I think the article for the place that is not the city should be named Misato, Saitama (Kodama). -- Rick Block 02:44, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What did the capital use to be before the creation of Saitama City?  Was it Urawa? (Urawa ward is the location of the government buildings) Nik42 06:14, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The prefectural capital is presently in Urawa-ku, Saitama, so unless it moved, it was previously in Urawa-shi. Fg2 21:36, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked a 1997 map I had lying in the closet.  The prefecture office is in the same spot as it is now, so, Urawa is correct. Neier 12:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misato?

message: Can we add the John Lennon Museum to the tourism section? Kansaikiwi 15:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure! Fg2 21:36, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourism 

message: "The eastern section of the southern border line, however, does overlap with any geological feature" - I assume given the preceding sentence concerning geological features at the other borders, that this is supposed to be "does not overlap", but as it has remained as "does" for at least several years I would appreciate if someone with appropriate knowledge could check this. 62.56.55.159 (talk) 14:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:Possibility

message: The article as I found it began:
:Possibility is the condition or fact of being possible. 
This definition is circular because the clause that defines the word contains the word being defined.  A better definition would be
:A possibility is an unrealized state of affairs whose conditions for realization, with respect to some temporal moment, are of undetermined or indeterminate reality.
It continues:
:Latin origins of the word hint at ability.
The Latin word posse does not hint at anything, but simply means "to be able to."  The next paragraph runs: 
:Possibility may refer to:
Possibility is the thing, and things do not refer to other things, only words do.  The issue is not what the word "possibility" denotes, but rather what types of possibility there are.  Here is the first in the list of types:
:Probability, the measure of the likelihood that an event will occur
A probability in general is not a type of possibility, but an unrealized state of affairs the chances of whose realization are greater than the chances of its continued lack of realization.  As defined above, "probability" is understood to be the measurable chances of realization of an unrealized state of affairs.    
The list continues:
:Epistemic possibility, a topic in philosophy and modal logic
:Possibility theory, a mathematical theory for dealing with certain types of uncertainty and is an alternative to probability theory
:Subjunctive possibility, (also called alethic possibility) is a form of modality studied in modal logic.
:Logical possibility, a proposition that will depend on the system of logic being considered, rather than on the violation of any single rule.
Possibility theory is not a type of possibility, so it does not belong on the list.  Neither EP nor SP is defined, but only identified as a topic.  The definition of LP is obscure.  I suggest the following definitions:
:An epistemic possibility is the determination of the truth or falsity of a proposition for which no states of affairs rules out either alternative on conceptual or empirical grounds. No one knows whether Goldbach's conjecture is true or false.
:A subjunctive possibility is a counterfactual state of affairs, i.e., a state of affairs that was part of a set of alternative unrealized states of affairs in the past, only one of which was in fact realized and which had real consequences, but from whose conjectural realization one can identify some consequences.  Had Martin Luther King not been assassinated, the riots of the summer of 1968 would not have happened is a counterfactual statement.
:A logical possibility is an unrealized state of affairs that the concepts of the things in that state of affairs neither entail nor rule out.  Wordwright (talk) 03:24, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several logical problems
Talk:Cab unit

message: Since cab unit and carbody unit are so closely related, I decided not to create a separate page for carbody units. If you want to use the phrase "carbody unit" in another article, and still link to this article for an explanation, use piping. E.g., use  carbody unit . Rmeier 03:30, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Carbody unit also redirects to cab unit. EASports 21:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

message: The lead paragraph states that cab and carbody units are similar but different and then gives their common features.  But nowhere does it say what a cab unit is or what a carbody unit is or what the differences between them are. Dricherby (talk) 08:34, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto --Badger151 (talk) 05:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what's the difference? 

message: While they are not common for american diesel locomotives, dual cab units (with two cabs, one at each end) are the most common style for European mainline locomotives (both diesel and electric), and in USA also the usual style for electric (passenger) locomotives. But I cannot find an article about that ... if a unit with 1 cab is called A unit and a unit with no cab is called B unit, what's a unit with 2 cabs called? --Tobias b köhler (talk) 18:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  And dual cab units?
Talk:Media in Minneapolis–Saint Paul

message: The tone is all wrong so far, and I'll have to look for sources to update the information now on the page. Keep me company as I clean up the article. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 21:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I see there is little talk page activity here.  

message: I'm surprized TC Daily Planet http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/ is not mentioned in this article.
I'm not sure which category it would go in - Daily, Neighborhood or Other.
Maybe there should be an Online category. Fholson 21:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  TC Daily Planet
Talk:Masayoshi Son

message: Like for example, there is currently a section about Arm Holdings. Why does this article about Masayoshi Son need to cover this specifically? --Ysangkok (talk) 16:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, just stuck all of those under a new section for SoftBank. Could use some expansion though, probably could take some material from the dedicated article for the company. - Indefensible (talk) 20:35, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article singling out SoftBank deals? 

message: it says he majored in Engineering, but graduated with in Economics? is this a typo or did he change majors? Nswix (talk) 23:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bachelor's degree 

message: The summary section and section on the Vision Fund do not appear to meet the standards for a neutral point of view for a biography of a living person (WP:BLP). These sections read as unbalanced in their over-emphasis on negative, sometimes hyperbolic commentary on the subject's character in a manner that may be potentially libelous. Farmlandsavannahpuck (talk) 23:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree with this assessment. It is possible the summary section and Vision Fund sections have been changed since written. I think the removal of the unbalanced and neutrality tags is warranted. --VVikingTalkEdits 20:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

text: Agreed. It appears all the potentially libelous content was added by a single user. Looking further into it, but meanwhile, statements such as those questioning a living person's sanity definitely needs to be removed. Quiltedcastle73 (talk) 20:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: BLP is not a license to delete cited content. Wikipedia reports on negative claims about living people all the time. MrOllie (talk) 20:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If user:Quiltedcastle73 was just removing the one line about his sanity being questioned I would be more willing to go along with the WP:BLP argument. however this appears to be more of a case of White Washing the article. Information about his poor investment decisions and the fact that most of his deals have failed, which are cited to Reliable Sources are also being removed.--VVikingTalkEdits 20:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I did remove the part about the media questioning his sanity. While well sourced, it could be worded in a less POV fashion. If as the articles I read didn't specifically question his sanity, just stated in the headline "Crazy" or eccentric who believes ..."I will let others add that specific section back in and would ask to make it a little POV.--VVikingTalkEdits 20:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV concerns