Talk:Eccles cake

message: What exactly is the difference between an Eccles Cake and a Chorley Cake?  They both seem to be identical to me, but a few people I've spoken to claim that there's a difference in the amount of filling.  I'm right slap bang in the middle of Eccles and Chorley, so the two seem to be used interchangeably by most.
Is there a difference, or is Chorley Cake another pseudonym for Eccles Cake? 86.140.252.76 17:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The differences are well outlined on the Chorley cake page, and can be aummarise as 1) Eccles uses puff pastry, Chorley shortcrust; 2) traditionally (and this obviously varies these days) no sugar was added to a Chorley cake, to either the fruit or pastry; 3) Chorley cakes usually use currants exclusively, whereas Eccles uses a mixture of currants, raisins and sultanas. Pyrope 10:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eccles vs. Chorley?

message: I think it ought to be "Eccles cake", not "Eccles Cake". ---- Eric 01:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just like the Chorley cake already is in fact :) ---- Eric 01:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation

message: From what I remember growin up in eccles, fly cake (or fly pie) were when the basic eccles cake was rolled so that the currents showed proud of the surface before baking (producing little hard crunchy areas on the currents so that it were like biting into a bug) whilst Eccles cakes did not have the currents showing entirely through the surface so there werent no crunchy bits.
This difference in preperation gave them a completely different texture as well as a slightly different taste.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.156.88 (talk) 23:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fly cake/Fly Pie 

message: :"The sugar contained in the cakes is alleged to be flammable"
Sugar is flammable; there's no "alleged" about it. Should I remove the "alleged", or is this intended to say "The cause of the fires is alleged to be the sugar on top of the cakes"? Marnanel (talk) 10:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter, I'd say, although "was thought to be the sugar on top of the cakes" (or "was said to be") would be more appropriate. No one's alleging criminality on the part of the sugar at this point.  Sca (talk) 16:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged to be flammable? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eccles cake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312074513/http://www.salford.gov.uk/living/yourcom/salfordlife/aboutsalford/salfordlocalhistory/localhistory-eccles/ecclescakes.htm to http://www.salford.gov.uk/living/yourcom/salfordlife/aboutsalford/salfordlocalhistory/localhistory-eccles/ecclescakes.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.visitlancashire.com/downloads/Chorley%20Cakes%20and%20Lancashrie%20Cheese.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified