lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leichhardt, New South Wales

message: This page was moved from "Leichhardt" to "Leichhardt, New South Wales" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) -- Ianblair23 12:35, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the Municipality of Leichhardt, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 10:25, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Local Government Area 

message: Unfortuantly I have had to add an unsourced tag to this article in accordance with Wikipedia policy. Hopefuly this problem will not remain topical for long; this article looks as though it could be developed in to a much stronger one, without too much trouble.
Also, I have removed the stub tag as this article has already been ranked Start Class (an article cannot be both Start Class and Stub Class at the same time). Jason McConnell-Leech 12:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refrencing 

message: How is it pronounced? Somehow I don't think it could be [ˈlaiçhɑʁt] as in German. Kelisi (talk) 07:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Hi, for legacy sake, I think it is useful to include the discontinued bus routes that passed through Leichhardt, M10, 444 etc, in the article, however I'm not sure what the best way to present this is. Perhaps history section? Or Leave them within the transport section as I have currently done? 
If there are other opinions about what should be done with routes that have ceased, any thoughts are much appreciated. Alternatively, it might be more useful to construct a stub about transport in leichhardt / inner-west and move the legacy routes over to there.
GreenJonan (talk) 01:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceased Bus Transport Routes and Historical Legacy
Talk:Stereochemistry

message: This has to be one of the most important chemistry articles in the encyclopedia.  Please, lets elevate it in priority and get some subject matter experts to attend to this.  One cannot possibly link to it in this shape.  Leprof 7272 (talk) 03:41, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really questionable shape, at present 

message: — Assignment last updated by Riversosa (talk) 16:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors Organic Chemistry I
Talk:Five Dock

message: This page was moved from "Five Dock" to "Five Dock, New South Wales" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) -- Ianblair23 12:58, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: The "Commercial Area" section of this article contains several unsourced, declarative statements which effectively render the given segment biased. 
I feel the section does not represnt all views fairly, proportionately and without bias, thus violating Wikipedia policy. 
Consequentialy I will tag the section accordingly (as per Wikipedia policy). The tag should remain in place until the section has been re-written, deleted, or a consenus has been reached. Jason McConnell-Leech 13:02, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-neutral point of view 
Talk:The Associates (band)

message: Is there any particular reason  his cover version of  "Boys Keep Swinging" is described as "Infamous" ?
--Rrose Selavy 18:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infamous? 

message: Just done a bit of a rewrite, as it was all a bit fancrufty. I've never heard of anybody being described as "peacockian" before: whoever wrote it is either totally oblivious to Wikipedia's advice on avoiding peacock terms or is simply taking the piss. I'm still not sure which  ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Could do with a link to http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/associates
There must be more articles that people might be looking for other than the band "Associates". For example a quick search gives:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associate%27s_degree
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgewater_Associates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associate  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.204.141 (talk) 13:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Comb Ceramic culture

message: Is this a hypothesis or how can they tell an absolute age for a place name? An interesting find. Where may I read more?Clarifer
Within the Jäkärlä group there are empty dolmens made of sandstone.
:Those structures have nothing to do with dolmens, and they have been re-dated to the Pre-Roman Iron Age. Earlier they were associated with Jäkärlä group, but this is not accepted anymore. 217.112.242.181 13:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Coming back to the topic: Old place names (toponymes) can be adopted by invadors or replaced by own ones, which linguists most times are able to recognize. In particular North America gives a plenty of examples. You can not normally be sure about their age.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:E5F8:91CE:D0F:830 (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place names dating from the stone age? 

message: Shoulden´t the main article name be Comb Ceramic Culture and the redirect be "Pit-Comb Ware culture", instead of the other way around? Is this realy the most common name fore the culture in english? --MiCkEdb 14:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick googling suggests you may be right. However, I don't know if they are the same thing or if one is a subcategory of the other. Anyone? Clarifer 12:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't even heard the expression "Pit-Comb Ware culture" before (although that doesn't have to mean anything, I work mostly with the Swedish Stone Age, and in swedish)... Anyway I'll try to move it back to the original name then. --MiCkEdb 17:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, tried it. As I suspected there is article history in the way, we need a sysop to do it. Do I put  on top of the article page or on this talk page or what? Is there a separate page where you can request a page to be moved? (I'm new to enwp). --MiCkEdb 17:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: What is this map supposed to show? Many of the cultures on the map are not contemporary at all, and large sections are blank. Megalophias (talk) 23:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: The  paragraph was self-contradicting and confused. Hope it's better now. Hans J. Holm 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:C114:BC81:C99B:A1EB (talk) 07:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: I updated the Y-hg nomenclature to the current one according to C. Quiles 2021, and ISOGG 2020.HJJHolm (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetics update
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anti-war/Reference material

message: I did an amazon search for "anti-war" and "peace movment" and these books were the relavant books that came up. If you have any information about any of the books (topic, scope etc.) please add it under the book in question.--JK the unwise 13:09, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Books on anti-war topics
Talk:Georges Hall

message: This page was moved from "Georges Hall" to "Georges Hall, New South Wales" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) -- Ianblair23 23:18, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 
Talk:Publishers Weekly lists of bestselling novels in the United States

message: does anyone plan to add other bestselling info to this list? as in, not just from the new york times, because if not, than i think it might be apt to change the title to reflect that it's new york times bestselling, which is obviously only one measurement of it. yes sortof picky, but more accurate. Feelingscarfy 13:19, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
:For now, I think the name is fine the way it is, since the New York Times' bestseller list is the standard used most often in commercial and promotional contexts (used for the covers of "bestselling" books and in press releases). In the future, if someone adds additional data regarding bestsellers as determined by other media outlets, then we'll decide what to do about article names. What would really be helpful is if someone could find information for the bestselling novels of the year from 1999-2004. Volatile 18:35, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *I thought that Publisher's Weekly only started publishing their best seller list in 1912?  What is the source for the information before 1912?  Is it The Bookman?--Milowent • hasspoken 04:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer my own question.  The answer is that from 1895-1912, The Bookman (New York) kept a best-seller list, which was the first such list in the United States.  Publisher's Weekly then started their own list.  Alice Payne Hackett, who worked for Publisher's Weekly, used the Bookman stats for this period.--Milowent • hasspoken 01:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before 1912? 

message: For the Publishers Weekly list of bestselling novels in the United States in the 2010s, I filled in the sections for 2017, 2018, and 2019 because, until now, they had been empty. However, I noticed a few problems while filling them that might be contradictory to the title. Since 2017, Publishers Weekly has put both fiction and nonfiction books into one list. The 2017 list only had ten books listed, meaning I had to include a nonfiction book and a poetry book to reach the desired number of ten books in the section. The 2018 list, which had twenty books, forced me to include picture books to reach the desired number because of the sheer number of nonfiction books on the list. I'm confused on what I should really be doing in those instances where there are just not enough novels to include to reach ten books, and I am wondering whether a consistent set of guidelines for these pages should be established. I'm not sure. What do you guys think? Lazman321 (talk) 06:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complications with recent lists 

message: my love for reading began with Daniel Steels'books. DMEichinger5 (talk) 07:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3APublishers_Weekly_lists_of_bestselling_novels_in_the_United_States#Untitled
Talk:Indian Shaker Church

message: Wasn't there also some opposition to the Indian Shakers from other non-Shakers in the community? I know that the Klallam have both Shakers and non-Shakers and public prayer is shared between religious groups, and that the Shakers are now accepted as part of the heritage and tradition, but that that wasn't always the case. Anyone know the details? Danielsilliman 16:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opposition

message: What's the date on that list of rules that the washichu handed down to the Shakers about their services? --Bluejay Young 21:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prohibition
Talk:K-Ci

message: No way was that just from 1992-1993...it was six years! Adding that it was "brief" to that statement doesn't make it true. Sourced below: Marysunshine 02:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with Mary J. 

message: Can anyone find a source online that says how many children Hailey has, and what there names are? The current article indicates he has two children -- Devin Hailey and Deven Cedric Renard. It seems unlikely he would have two children both named Devin/Deven but spelt differently, and I can't find a source for Deven. Zzaps (talk) 01:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:Hofuf

message: It is amazing how quickly any mention of the Shias in this and other parts of Saudi Arabia is removed from here. Not only in Saudi Arabia, but also here in the cyber-space, the truth about the religious identity of the citizens are glossed over. Until 2003, the invasion of Iraq and the liberation of the Shia's there, no mention of the Shias could be made in or outside of the Saudi Arabia without serious ramifications to the person. Hufuf located in the Hasa/Ahsa district--one of the oldest centers of Shiism in the Arabian Peninsula, cannot be stated to have any Shias on the pages of Wiki without the statement being quickly removed and replaced with either blank or some abusive states about the Shias (the last time, the vandal who changed the information on Ethnography of the region, mentioned that there were some of the "ghulats" (apostates) still living in the area! One can only hope that the motto of "Live and let live" would some day make its debut in Saudi Arabia and the minds of the Wahhabi zealots. Deus Vult! IzadyIzady (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored parts of your deleted edits. Please copyedit it according to WP:MOS. Alefbe (talk) 16:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: old comment on Shias

message: The intro: “Al-Hofuf (Arabic: ٱلْهُفُوف al-Hufūf, also spelled Hofuf or Hufuf, also known as "Al-Hasa", "Al-Ahsa" or "Al-Hassa")“
This is like saying “Manhattan, also known as New York City”, or “San Jose, also known as Silicon Valley”. It’s the largest city in Al-Hasa, it’s not synonymous with Al-Hasa. 159.0.79.217 (talk) 11:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  AlHofuf is not also known as Al-Hasa
Talk:Oenology

message: The 'oe' looks fancy, but 'enology' seems to be the most common spelling, and the one favored in dictionaries.
Grant, 6 March 2018
:It seems to be a British English vs American English issue. Sometimes the correct one to use is self-evident (e.g. an American company or a British actor) but for global topics, it becomes harder to find the balanced option to use. However I did look both up and oenology does appear to be more prevalent. Rayman60 (talk) 18:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Oenology v Enology

message: From a natural point of view, the characteristics of a wine are determined by two factors : vine and terroir. A vine is a type of grape fruit, each type has different characteristics and grows best in a particular climate.
The terroir (terre = "earth" in French) is the name used to describe aspects of wine linked with geological or climatological factors. The type of grape is not the only factor affecting the final taste. The nature of soil (chalk, silica,...), number of days of sunshine, and humidity play a big part as well. Unlike other plants, a grapevine need not be "satisfied" to obtain good results. One says that the vine has to suffer, such as from lack of water or from cold, in order to produce the best grape.
-----
Wnissen 13:38, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Natural aspects

message: ..should be modified to "..from grape growing to..". Oenolgy does not start with the harvest. It includes the growing of grapes also, all aspects to produce wine. (for example also to buy the right area for winegrowing, to dig for and to analyze the soil data of a potential winegrowing soil etc.). BerndB 17:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "..from grape harvest to.."

message: About food processing 49.151.235.118 (talk) 03:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TLE
Talk:Yowie Bay, New South Wales

message: This page was moved from "Yowie Bay" to "Yowie Bay, New South Wales" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) -- Ianblair23 13:54, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 
Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates/Autofellatio

message: Nohat rm the  tag with edit sum: remove bogus {{FPC} . 
This is offensively illegal; I properly nominated the image, and now it shall run its course, pass or fail. After the 2-day comment period, the respected user may choose to vote against FP status for this image -- and that is the extent of his privilege. — Xiong熊talk* 14:49, 2005 August 18 (UTC)
:Your claims that this is a good faith nomination are transparently duplicitous. This image never has and never will have support to make it a featured picture and you know it. Nominating it to be a featured picture is just being controversial for the sake of controversy. There is no need for troublemakers like you to troll Wikipedia. Please spare us your pious grandiloquence and get back to making productive contributions to Wikipedia. Nohat 23:03, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason I removed the tag is because at the time, there was no corresponding entry on the FPC page. No entry on FPC page = bogus tag. Nohat 23:08, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second removal
Talk:East Champaran district

message: Why the title is East Champaran disatrict, instead of East Champaran ? -- Extra999 (talk) 23:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Naming convention for Indian districts. All articles contain the name and then the uncapitalized "district". Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Dear Sir
Shri Ram Biahri Sharma a Freedom fighter and great visionary in the field of womens education. He was founder secretary of shree Ktishan mahila college, siruna High school and L.N.D collage in Motihari.He also proposed Mahatma Ghandhi university at Motihari which present chife Minister Nitish Kumar given his consent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.149.49.65 (talk) 11:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular list of Motihari 
Talk:TMF (UK & Ireland)

message: Nick Jr. on TMF is sooo pointless!!!!!69.141.79.71 02:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  nick jr. 

message: Bardcom edited this to United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. It currently stands as British Isles. Looking at broadcast areas for other radio stations (I've looked at half a dozen in UK and Europe) they are given as countries rather than geographical areas, so maybe Bardcom's suggestion is good here. Comments? CarterBar (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcast Area
Talk:European Constitution

message: European Constitution originally redirected to :Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and later redirected to :Treaties of the European Union. Special:Whatlinkshere/Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe indicates that the latter switch was ill-advised, as almost all inlinks from redirects with "Constitution" in their title intend to refer to the abandoned treaty, not the current collection of treaties. I am making European Constitution a disambiguation page for now; I guess over time more people will use it in the "current" sense rather than the "abandoned" sense. jnestorius(talk) 15:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: While we're waiting, there's a whole bunch of links that now need to be pointed to the correct article. Can we count on your help? --JaGatalk 19:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they were previously pointing at the wrong article; now they're pointing at a dab page, which is less bad. Bots and tools tend to pick up the dab pointers easily. So, you've already had my help. jnestorius(talk) 22:23, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, bots and tools don't "pick them up easily". Editors do the work, and it takes a lot of time. Since you seem to be informed about the subject, you could do the work faster than a random editor at WP:DPL. --JaGatalk 00:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

text: Works for me per WP:TWODABS. I've converted it into a redirect to Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe. --JaGatalk 23:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Made a disambiguation
Talk:West Champaran district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The title should be West champaran instead of west champaran district ?? --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 18:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: West champaran instead of west champaran district

message: We need a citation to support that "Indigo cultivation yielded quick benefits to the British colonizers but frequent cultivation of indigo even for few years ruined the entire subsoil decreasing the possibility of any further cultivation of any kind. Even now, the regions of Indigo cultivation in the past are barren and have only scrub vegetation in stark contrast." RJFJR (talk) 17:22, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Indigo
Talk:Van 't Hoff factor

message: What the hell
The van't Hoff factor is literally just how many particles a formula breaks up into!
The equations are insanely useless, and also how it's described makes 0 sense. Whoever wrote this left 2 unknowns in the equation. i = 1 + alpha??? That doesn't even make sense. Whoever wrote this needs to re-evaluate their life.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.110.66.69 (talk) 22:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Only when the solution is so dilute that complete dissociation occurs. For most practical solutions this is not the case - the degree of dissociation diverges from ideal at pretty low concentrations (e.g. below 0.01 mol/kg). For instance for a 1 mol/kg solution of NaCl, the degree of dissociation has been measured to be 0.789, leading to an actual van't Hoff factor of 1.789. Using a value of 2 would lead to a significant error in this case. See  for more info. --137.44.3.81 (talk) 13:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: This is beyond erroneous and unnecessarily complicated

message: Arrgh! -- not near any Organic Chem. books. ... Did Jacobus Henricus van 't Hoff actually discover this factor? or did someone else discover it and named it after him?  As it is now, I left it as the factor being named after him.  Vonkje 14:27, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the name

message: H2SO4 dissociation is two step, assumption that 64% means 64 molecules out of 100 are completely ionized is horribly wrong. It'll all depend on concentration, but for the 0.05M solution something like 100% dissociation for the first step and 15% for the second step will be closer to reality. It'll be better to use acetic acid as an example.
:The example calculates 64& of the acid dissociated to sulfate + oxonium ions and 36% undissociated which is absolutely impossible. --FK1954 (talk) 06:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: H2SO4 example needs to be changed

message: I'm no chemist, so excuse me, but the formula is way too fancy. I was taught that Van't hoff was observed / calculate. No a - 1/ a- whatever stuff Tourskin 04:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too fancy 

message: Could someone provide or link to an explanation of unity, referenced within the first section, for those of us without chemistry degrees?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.186.115 (talk) 15:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unity

message: In this Wikipedia article the van't Hoff factor is defined as a quotient between actual number of solute particles and theoretical molecular number of particles. Contrary to this, my old chemistry book, the one I used when studying chemistry, defines it as a quotient of actual value of the colligative property, like depression on freezing temperature, to the theoretical one. The difference is substantial. Can someone else help?Auró (talk) 11:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A confusion seems to have occurred between this factor and the osmotic coefficient or dissociation degree.--5.2.200.163 (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of van't Hoff factor
Talk:Kishanganj district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Methodological naturalism/Archive 1

message: creationists such as Johnson are always banging on about how scientific philosophy exlcudes the possibility of creation by their intelligent designer, but is this in use by any proper philosophers of science? Dunc|☺ 21:28, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any references or authoraties other than the creationists? 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Methodological_naturalism&direction=prev&oldid=7764695
The article seemed to go suddenly downhill from there, and never substantially recover.  Anyone object to a revert to that version?  Alai 17:24, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whatever happened to this version?