lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Quince Orchard High School

message: Updated
 Updated about the Arts, and sports, will follow season to update later.Bivakasha 19:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: It was good to see an expansion of the Famous alumni section. I removed the wikilink, because it linked to a Canadian soccer player born in Wales who is obviously someone else with the same name. IMDb lists four actors with the name Paul James. So there should be some information about which one this is, and there should also be a source or reference on the Internet or elsewhere. Coyets 08:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul James (actor) 
Talk:Cork GAA honours

message: This article is in no way a an indiscriminate collection of items of information. Most teams have collections of sporting honours . The way the GAA is set up this allows certain county to claim honours from over 4 sports with both men and women's and as such are far to big for the main articles in this case Cork GAA (Gnevin 19:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cork GAA was under 40k with the honours merged back in. That's not large. So the , which I removed after the merge, is restored. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 19:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  These Honours are too long on the main page, this subpage allows people to discover about Cork GAA and without having to look at the honours  unless they really want too (Gnevin 19:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I dont see the point of creating loads of work arounds when WP:NOT#PAPER allows us to have this article (Gnevin 17:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What paper or electrons have to do with it escapes me. Either this is worth having an article on (and this isn't any sort of an article), or it should be merged somewhere (Cork GAA can stand it) or it should be deleted because Wikipedia is not a collection of GAA trivia with no supporting commentary or analysis. Me, I recommend the merge, but I can live with deletion. Only you can turn it into an article (apparently nobody else cares). Angus McLellan  (Talk) 15:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NOT]]
Talk:Jeannette H. Lee

message: Some Googling:
* "Jeannette Lee" Sytel 
* "Jeannette H. Lee" Sytel 
* "Jeannette White" Sytel 
* "Jeannette Lee" TechTeam 
* "Jeannette H. Lee" TechTeam 
* "Jeannette White" TechTeam 
Seems to produce results that are just profiles and index entries.  Attempting searches like "Jeannette H. Lee" Washington seems to mostly produce false positives.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  22:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source searching 

message: I've WP:MINEd the sources turned up in the AfD and expanded the article to the extent possible with them.  I did not draw on the Montgomery County Commission for Women entry  because it is obviously a self-written curriculum vitae, and thus just a primary source, which I'm not comfortable using for claims of awards and directorships and so forth.  I'll leave that to others to consider (especially since much of it could be verified by someone who actually lives in Maryland and has access to state and county records – some of these may be online, but I don't know enough about MD paper trails to go digging for them).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  23:08, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion with more sources
Talk:Alexander Alyabyev

message: At least the second external link I really need to put these under References, which is what it is: a link whose content was used to help edit the article itself rather than provide further reading material. 
The two surviving quartets were recorded in 1948 by the Beethoven Quartet, and issued on CD in 1999 (Gilels and the Beethoven Quartet recorded the piano quintet, also, in 1960.); another recording of the complete quartets (one was not) was also made by a quartet named in homage to Rimsky. 
As to the list of works I found, it does not include a symphony in E minor which the US Library of Congress holds (published in 1955), so one may add that to a worklist as well... Schissel | Sound the Note! 21:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Albertine (album)

message: I assume the info about Fraser currently touring the United States is out of date. dramatic (talk) 07:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beliefnet

message: This page reads more like a press release written by a long-time b'net member.  Except for the cited press release all of the information about the site is probably personal research.  JimCubb 21:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but I do think that this would make a good article. I think it's salvagable and will add it to my "to do" list. Nightngle 15:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, a lot of the information has been lifted from the Beliefnet site. I'll work on it in the next few days and get rid of the plagiarism and find some outside sources for references.  Roaming27 06:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: I have cleaned up the talk page by removing all discussions pertaining to the topic (of which I am also guilty of), as opposed to discussions pertaining to the article. This page is to be used strictly for discussions on how to improve the Wikipedia article, not for general discussion of the topic. If you simply want to moan and groan about the topic, do it elsewhere; this is not the place for general discussion. I have also added the "forum" tag to dissuade those who may treat this as a forum in the future. I have also added two Wikiproject banners (one for religion and one for websites). Hopefully we can get a few more people coming from those projects to help out. --132 19:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk page clean up
Talk:Users' group

message: If anyone is interested in a mass effort with many user groups to work on this section, please let me know (marsee(at)oreilly.com). I work with user group leaders all over the world and have a special program to provide resources from O'Reilly. I can also help build the user group list. We have one at O'Reilly on a wiki too. I have been our dedicated UG contact for almost 5 years now.  Marsee 21:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

message: The section "Computer user group" largely duplicates prior contents of the article. This may be due to a merger, but is pointless.  I don't have time right now to fix it, but I believe the contents should be merged with the rest of the article and this section deleted - unless the article discusses specifics of other types up user groups also. Peter Flass (talk) 02:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication
Talk:Serena van der Woodsen

message: Plenty of spelling errors, needs to be condensed and edited for grammar.
Cold December 21:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this article should cover both the TV show and the books. If I had more time, I would do this.  I would make a section called "In the TV series" or something. — *Hippi ippi 12:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for judging me; my comment above does not say anything at all about my preferences.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia which covers all aspects of things, so I stand by my comment above.  You, however, sound biased. — *Hippi ippi 03:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  "The Type A Behavior Pattern, is a set of characteristics that includes being... incapable of relaxation" - oh dear. Chill, man.  Oh, so you're from a stuck up Manhattan family, eh?  What are you doing on wikipedia then?! ;) — *Hippi ippi 02:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I haven't read all the books, but if you call a pash in a bathtub while she was drunk a fling... puhlese.  I've removed this once already, but please, correct me if I'm wrong. — *Hippi ippi 02:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and did Serena really hook up with Chuck? — *Hippi ippi 02:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serena van der Woodsen hooked up with Blair? 

message: I'm organizing this back into the same format as the other character's. We don't need such a long description on what happens in the books, or a detailed summary on her relationship with each character!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.210.60.183 (talk) 04:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  We don't need such a lengthy book summary. 

message: One difference between the book and the television show is that in the show, Eric is younger than Serena, rather than older. Eric also is forced out of the closet by Georgina Sparks in the show, where as his sexuality is not similarly branded in the books.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.21.90.106 (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eric Van Der Woodsen. 

message: Hi , the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serena van der Woodsen (2nd nomination) was keep, but it was not demonstrated how this character is independently notable from the show or the actress portraying the character. What was the winning argument? AadaamS (talk) 18:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd AfD nomination discussion 
Template talk:Speculation

message: I think this template is very important especially in movie or sensitive articles where people would speculate on them. I have come across so many movie articles that try to "explain" one thing or another and tries to justify it. Speculation occurs sometimes article, where sensitive information are presented, like how or when China would invade Taiwan. (I came across this, incidentally, in a movie article - so this maybe a bad example.) (its there as of oct 5, 2006)
I tried to reword the template a bit but seems like it still fails to warn people who are reading the article of these speculations. So, if you can think of a stronger wording, please apply them to the template.Feureau 21:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We could add Reader beware: but that might come off as offensive, so I don't know. I'll see if I can think of another alternative. Regards, Signaturebrendel 22:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template wording to '''''warn''''' people of speculation.

message: That's all I hav to say about this topic.
It's too long. BrewJay (talk) 04:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  It needs to be tersened into a request. 

message: Per "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation" (see WP:CRYSTAL), I edited the template to read "This article appears to contain unverifiable speculation and unjustified claims. Information must be verifiable and based on reliable published sources. Please remove unverified speculation from the article." The template previously read, "This article appears to contain speculation and unjustified claims. Information must be verifiable and based on reliable published sources. Please remove speculation from the article." -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Unverifiable speculation

message: It had previously been on the list, but was later removed as being redundant with the navbox. While that's true, the navbox is a dense mass of templates, most of which are only peripherally related to this template, whereas Speculation section is very closely tied to this template and those who might be looking to apply it; I think that warrants the duplication.
(I see from the code that this template take the standard override for the default "article" term via the first unnamed parameter (e.g. , however that's not documented the way it is in Template:Original research/doc and others. If the documentation is updated to make it clear that Speculation section is a purely redundant template, then I'd see no reason for it to remain on the "See also" list.) -- FeRD_NYC (talk) 14:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readded [[Template:Speculation section]] to the "See also" list
Talk:Echidna (mythology)

message: Removing the reference to Sonic the Hedgehog as the character Knuckles has absolutley nothing to do with the mythological Echidna.Cobratom 18:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pointless trivia

message: the Echidna is the "mother of all monsters". well unfortanatly the Echidna didn't give burth to all monsters i know it is probably a figure of speech but they could verify it better.the Echidna was married to Typon and she had a head of a woman and the body of a dragon. it is the mother of many monsters. But not all. they greeks and romans beleved it to live in a cave and if anyone were to get infront or close to the cave she will eat you alive.--24.168.247.155 (talk) 18:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Echidna's Life 

message: According to the article on Typhon, "Orthrus, a fearsome two-headed hound. According to Hesiod, he mated with his mother, Echidna, to sire Cerberus, the Nemean Lion, the Lernean Hydra, the Sphinx and the Chimera". I think this should be added to this article for completeness.
ICE77 (talk) 03:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, given as how Orthrus' own article mentions this, also.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:10, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthrus and Echidna 

message: It seems this article is the main reference on the Internet that Echidna was the mother of the Teumessian Fox and it doesn't even have a source for that claim, the only point in the list of Echidna's offspring which doesn't have any reference. The Teumessian Fox page mentions Echidna as her mother but again without any source. Somebody should add the reference or it should be deleted IMO. That definitely wasn't mentioned in Ovid's 'Metamorphoses' (describes the hunt for the fox without specifying its origins), Hesiod's 'Theogony' (doesn't lists the fox among Echidna offspring and at all) and Pausanias' 'Description of Greece' (briefly describes the hunt and mentions that the fox was sent by Dionysus).217.118.64.49 (talk) 05:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just deleted this, as I can find no ancient source which says that the Fox was the offspring of Echidna. Paul August ☎ 17:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  no source for the Teumessian Fox
Talk:List of tourist attractions in Amsterdam

message: "The Dam, the central square of Amsterdam, where stands the Royal Palace" - te mooi, ik ga hem niet eens verbeteren. PizzaMan (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: dunglish

message: This seems to be a big tourist attraction but I don't see it listed. DBlomgren (talk) 07:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone add info about the "I amsterdam" sign?
Talk:Opština

message: The WikiProject classification for Opština is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set  on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  18:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Counter-Vandalism Department

message: * 
I happened across this today in pretty bad shape. It is especially troubling since this edit only got part of the original vandalism. I also could find no reference to him being molested that did not have the word "wikipedia" in it. So I reverted that out wholesale. Anyway, this article needs a few babysitters/expanders.  --Trödel 21:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not frequent - but needs watching 

message: A few months back an anonymous editor was going around adding to articles such as Glenn Ford and Bob Hope a rather nonsensical statement, usually a variant of "In their later years they concentrated on their passion for collecting salt and pepper shakers." When I saw the exact same wording appearing in a few places I got suspicious, and I actually contacted a relative of Glenn Ford's who is a friend of mine and asked if he could confirm the information, and he said it was nonsense. So I've been reverting this statement whereever it appears. This vandal seemed to disappear for awhile but reemerged earlier today at Glenn Ford. I blocked that IP but he might turn up again elsewhere. Just a heads up more than anything else that should editors come across reference to "salt and pepper shaker collecting" in any biographical articles, they should treat this as suspicious and probably revert without question. Cheers. 23skidoo 18:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the warning!! --plange 20:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Watch out for Salt and Pepper Shakers Vandal

message: The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mark_Karr article needs to be watched. It gets vandalized on a daily basis.ShadowWriter 21:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: John Mark Karr

message: I believe that on this page, which is protected, there are several Wikipedia Policy violations, so I prepared a draft Talk:Li_Hongzhi/Edit_request_2007-02-14 which removes some of these violations. 
Could anyone of you take the time and look over these and perhaps let me know how to proceed further?
This is an important page since it ranks first on google see here:  --HappyInGeneral 13:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I think I should move this notice here: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard, but still please feel free take a look. --HappyInGeneral 13:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Li Hongzhi]]

message: I notice some of the volunteers are from 2005, and some are no longer active. Should we redirect this page to Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism? DrKiernan (talk) 09:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active?
Talk:Spiller

message: Is there some particular reason why there is a huge discography table with about 20 counties listed and about 90% of all the boxes filled with dashes?  Only three countries have chart positions listed.  What's the point? -- eo 21:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -- eo 12:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography
Talk:Jeffrey Sebelia

message: Hey, what happened to the info about Jeff leaking that he won the competition before it was officially announced.  PR was saying they were going to sue him.
So what happened? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.174.73.184 (talk) 07:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeff being sued

message: I've reverted the page back to its format at 02:40 on October 4th, which leaves the changes that SweetNSpicyGal keeps making, but asks for sources of her research.  This is an encyclopedia; it is perfectly reasonable to expect all information in an article be verifiable.  
I also deleted the paragraph in the "notes" section, as that is not a place to have a discussion about the issue, and put back the HTML that cites the source of information about Sebelia's neck tattoo.
:Just made a minor change regarding the neck tattoo.  The Italian phrase "l’amor de la mia vita" translates to "the love of my life" not "is the..."  The citation says Sebelia says his son is the love of his life, but not that the tattoo is a direct translatin of such.  It's nit picky but just wanted to explain why I removed the "is" Pnkrockr 14:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing Sources

message: I've cleaned the article up, ID'd where citations are still needed. I'll be closely monitoring behaviour of all editors for this point on. If anyone chooses to maliciously edit the article, without reasonable justification mentioned in the edit summary, they will be warned against it. I will block people for a day, then three days, then a week at a time, if they edit maliciously.  --  Zanimum 15:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Phoe 17:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup, monitor 

message: Hi, I've made a few changes, mostly in keeping with Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Addhoc 22:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor changes 
Talk:Thomas Di Leva

message: This article is a translation from Swedish Wikipedia (the version on which the current translation is based on found at []). SimAura (talk) 15:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated article 

message: [[
thumbnail|01234567890012345678900123456789213
jkgw';lowasjkjbbnjm,901323456789
jgqiaqeyop901+  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.40.84.244 (talk) 14:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUJHUQIOILKANMNNBH 
Talk:List of My Family episodes

message: It seems that the BBC decided to bill the episode on the 7th May 2009 ("The Guru") as the 100th episode (see Radio Times, The Times etc)... thus presumably counting the Comic Relief Special as an episode. Shouldn't Wikipedia reflect this too?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.158.238 (talk) 16:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't have to follow BBC numbering, this is an indepedent website.--UpDown (talk) 07:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 100th episode

message: Where is this epsiode on?
I can't find it out tv guide or RT.--86.156.177.69 (talk) 20:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it, it is a hoax.--UpDown (talk) 20:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Years Special 2007/2008
Talk:Nasal sebum

message: What is the medical term for it? And if it can be found, shouldn't that be the title? --MacRusgail 03:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's the point, really. There's already an article on the scientific name, sebum. IMO there's really no need for this article, any more than there is a need for the second knuckle of the ring finger. Anchoress 03:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't object to the article content as a whole (but which I think is over the top), but it could do with being somewhat more scientific. NB could "nasal sebum" do the trick? --MacRusgail 03:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Medical name

message: The citation to Ed Kolpin comes right after the reference to fingernails, but a little research indicate that Mr. Kolpin's area of expertise is the pipe. Is the footnote reference in the wrong place, is it wrong to cite a non-expert in fingernail buffing, and does this "personal conversation" constitute original research? It was this sentence that made me wonder whether the Onion had branched out.... 69.141.41.214 (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ed Kolpin citation

message: The first time I'd ever heard of "nose grease" was in reference to lubricating the gate on a movie camera.  Google ("nose grease film gate") comes up with quite a few citations, and some of them might be usable, here.  Something to do later... Mdwyer (talk) 15:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cinematography

message: Wasn't the fly fishing ferrules tip also referenced in the famous book by J.R. Hartley - "Fly Fishing"? --Roxy the dog (talk) 23:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source? 

message: I just came here because I was notified about the link to Stray Light. The funny part is that someone (I can not remember yet who) was telling me about nose grease, just a couple of days ago, something about which I was previously unaware. A very odd coincidence perhaps, but because of my experience I believe this is a real subject, which some people have been sharing and exploiting for a while. I will try to remember who was telling me about it; maybe it will lead to some more citations. And, by the way, I have a real problem with the idea that orally transmitted knowledge is somehow not important. A great deal of the good stuff I know, I did not read. AJim (talk) 13:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @AJim Same, friend, this page has merit. I was introduced to the idea of nose grease in a random conversation and came here surprised to find it's a real topic. 27.96.222.134 (talk) 04:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is real, keep it around
Category talk:Civil law (legal system)

message: What is the difference between this cat and :Category:Civil law? If none, should they be merged? AndrewRT - Talk 22:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See the civil law article. The civil law system, which is the matter of this category, is entirely separate and distinct from the civil law area of common law. --PullUpYourSocks 03:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This the same as :Category:Civil law legal systems, is it not? Kevlar67 (talk) 16:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better merge