lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:South Park (disambiguation)

message: Does anyone know how to automatically hide the contents box on pages like this?
Chrisch 04:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! --Andylkl [ talk! | c ] 05:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

message: All inbound links to this page and any incoming redirects need to be scanned for correctness.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 16:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The inbound links need to be scanned and corrected 

message: I live in Upper Sandusky, Ohio, I have no clue what this place is. It's literal place is at a low-income housing.  I just noticed that it wasn't on the list. http://i948.photobucket.com/albums/ad326/0xg0ldpk3rx0/SouthParkUpperSandusky1.jpg 0xg0ldpk3rx0 (talk) 21:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Park, Upper Sandusky
Talk:Dawkins Revolution

message: Yes, the change was revolutionary. Yes, it was initiated by Minister John Dawkins. But the actual policy was called the 'Unified National System'. It did what it said on the tin: took the different parts of higher education system (universities, institutes of technology and colleges of advanced education) and unified them. 
At the very least, could someone please add a redirect from 'Unified National System' to this page. At the moment, if you search for 'Unified National System', you get nothing. 
Jonathan O'Donnell (talk) 00:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this page be called 'Unified National System'
Talk:Royal Australasian College of Surgeons

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://ama.com.au/royal-australasian-college-surgeons http://www.surgeons.org/government/community-and-international-programs/faqs/ and others. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 12:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mukurob

message: The call for a citation in this article (yes, I am the original author) sparked a train of thought which I think is interesting and might be very important.
Throughout the world, but especially in Africa, knowledge, news, fiction and so on are all passed on orally. Only rarely are these nuggets of information (and disinformation) formally recorded, and then often with great differences of interpretation and content.
In the article, I assert that Nama oral tradition predicted that 'white' rule would end when the rock structure collapsed. My statement is based on several conversations in the Seventies and Eighties, around campfires and while travelling through the desert. There are no citations; the Nama stories are largely unrecorded.
The fact that I cannot provide a citation does not particularly bother me; I think that factoid is interesting but not significant. Probably a coincidence. There have been several other similar predictions the most famous of which is the prediction of Nonquase, a Xhosa girl, that two suns would rise and the white people would be driven into the sea by the ancestors who have risen from the grave. Well, that didn't happen.
What does concern me (and prompted my relating the prediction) is that these snippets information are just going to be lost through inattention, and worse, through self-censorship.
Perhaps there should be another wiki for this sort of thing. Before it is too late.
not young enough to know everything 04:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ogre Juice

message: I agree that this article is in need of improvement. However, whomever prodded this page for deletion apparently did not read the notice above that states the entire series of cocktail-related articles are undergoing evaluation, improvement, and/or merging into the main articles. Prematurely deleting pages while we are still working on them severely hinders our progress. If deleted, it requires us to request the deleted information back from an administrator so that we can cull the useful bits out of the original article. Once the project is finished with this cleanup, we will be nominating many articles for deletion. If we cannot find more information to improve this article, it probably will be one that will be deleted at that time. Thanks. --Willscrlt 11:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod
Talk:Uttarakhand

message: The  used on this page is going to be replaced with  as per the Proposal and Consensus of RFC. Any questions/suggestions? Discuss Here.
You can also contribute by replacing Infobox settlement with Infobox Indian state or territory on other pages , or by improving this one. Tojoroy20 (talk) 20:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced —  Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox replacement 

message: The redirect UA (India) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:UA (India)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Pedro de Castro Van Dúnem

message: @user:Mewulwe: I was just adding sources and more data to the article when you put your question mark on the year of birth. Are you now satisfied? Cheers. L.Willms (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thanks. Mewulwe (talk) 22:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit conflict
Talk:SAY Media

message: The article is 100% POV, PR content - Videoegg is a web advertising firm that blasts annoying Flash-animated ads at consumers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.162.67.79 (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I have removed:
===Posting on other Sites===
Not only does VideoEgg allow the user to publish his videos via email, but it also let's the user put his videos on other Sites. These Sites include:
*America Online
*bebo
*carspace
*current_
*consumating
*myYearbook
*Tagged
*hi5
VideoEgg allows posting to very many websites so this is a pointless list. Further, the point of the system is to publish to the web not by email. BlueValour 04:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Material removed

message: Not only does VideoEgg allow the user to publish his videos via email, but it also let's the user put his videos on other Sites. These Sites include:
*America Online
*bebo
*carspace
*current_
*consumating
*myYearbook
*Tagged
*hi5
VideoEgg allows posting to very many websites so this is a pointless list. Further, the point of the system is to publish to the web not by email. BlueValour 04:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Posting on other Sites

message: Added an advert tag - the copy in the "History" section is verbatim from the company's "About Us" page: http://www.videoegg.com/about/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.165.31.145 (talk) 01:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert tag

message: SAY Media is no longer a separate company. Maven acquired it in 2018. See https://www.crunchbase.com/acquisition/themaven-network-inc-acquires-saymedia--315d8b23 for instance.
I currently work for Maven, so that creates a conflict of interest, so I should not update the page myself. Vipul (talk) 18:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to mention acquisition by Maven?
Talk:SFJAZZ Collective

message: Press kit from www.sfjazz.org]. I am on dialup, so large photographs take too long for me to download often. When someone has a moment, please download one or more of these pictures to place in the article. If no one does, I will when I don't need much CPU. (Mind meal 08:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Press photos available
Talk:Sony Ericsson K310

message: removed: Http://www.livingroom.org.au/cameraphone/archives/sony-ericsson-k310.jpg
Don't know if it is free or not, plus hadn't been uploaded properly and thus wasn't linked properly inside the article. Mathmo Talk 05:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This article says that the screen is STN but on GSMArena is says that the screen is UBC.
Is this an error or are they the same? Solidsnake204 19:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screen? 

message: Thanks.... for whoever you are who have re-design this artice... It looks better than before!
Ali Wardhana 09:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc 

message: "containing all the features of a high-end phone like its predecessor K300" I find that the K300i can play SVG(Z) files, while the K310i cannot. If confirmed, the "all features" comment should be changed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.180.92.43 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure that the K310 doesn't support SVG(Z) files? I have the similar K510 which does support SVG(Z) files. --Solidsnake204 Talk ~ Contribs 10:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Because the two phones are similar, the K320 is listed in the 'Variants' paragraph.--Solidsnake204 Talk ~ Contribs 20:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrade
Talk:Tye Tribbett

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 17:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Ozwald Boateng

message: This is an advert, isn't it? 85.179.16.228 (talk) 10:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Fair Store

message: I have created a new page for The Fair Store, as I found there is no such page existing already and it may have had several firsts in the Discount Department store catagory - odd prices I.E. 99cents instead of round numbers, and several statements about lowest prices or discounts dating to the early 1900's, prior to all the other mentions of early discount department stores being started in the 1950's.  Any input is welcome and requested, if an earlier example exists and additional information on the Fair Store
Found more information to be added kidsheaven 00:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Located only a few locations in the Chicago Market, I have found some info that is not posted here.  Not sure on any legality issues on if I can copy a picture from the Internet (copyrighted web-site) Chicago Jazz Era has photos of the store and a book that I have.  I still need to check on added info to update the site.  Kidsheaven 23:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was last owned by S.S. Kresge, same owner as Kmart prior to selling out to Montgomery Ward - I don't know if it is possible they ever used the name in Michigan with that being Kresge/Kmart Headquarters in the time period?  From my reading, I understood that it may have even shared merchandise with Kresge stores, and was sold out to Wards when Kresge/Kmart became the dominant part of the company in the Chicago market.Kidsheaven 23:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Fair store I mentioned in Michigan was almost certainly different. There was another in Lansing. TenPoundHammer 02:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair Store
Talk:Black body radiation

message: I reverted this page to redirect to Black body again. Planck's law is mentioned in a section of this main article - IMO, if there is a choice, redirects should be going to the more accessible & comprehensive page. ― GrimRevenant 05:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But "black body radiation" has a better fit with Planck's law of black body radiation, whereas a "black body" is an idealised physical object.  --Michael C. Price talk 08:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert - Redirect to [[Black body]]
Talk:Bigfoot (1970 film)

message: In order to remain, the page must comply with Wikipedia standards. The informal use of the word 'get' and repetition of 'then' showcase a basic description which needs improvement.Vphaslash9810 (talk) 23:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Informal vocabulary
Talk:Varsha Usgaonkar

message: Yes 41.113.234.16 (talk) 17:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How God is
Talk:Ubayd Zakani

message: The Tag "pederastic poets" should be removed.F Mir 05:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: discussion
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Tagbilaran

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 16:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Outstanding Airman of the Year Ribbon

message: "The first woman to win this award was Linda Vollink."  This was  tagged back in May 2007.  I looked through the list of recipients and wasn't able to determine the first female, based on names alone.  There was a "Mary Ellen Loy" back in 1971.  If someone can come up with a cite for this, it can be re-added. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st Female Recipient
Talk:Outstanding Airman badge

message: * Disagree due to the fact that military badges receive their own page, or to be grouped on a page other similar badges. Furthermore, this information would not be relevant to the Awards and decorations of the United States Air Force page as a badge is not an award or decoration and if it were to be merged would be more applicable to Badges of the United States Air Force which does not give detailed information on the individual badges. --Darkstar949 13:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Recommendation
Talk:Spatulamancy

message: Are you sure this is not "scapulamancy?"
I am pretty sure it is Ageus13 14:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Is this article even necessary?  Doesn't Wikipedia have enough articles on "divination" methods?  This article needs some cultural context to defend its existence.  I could throw a bunch of spatulas on my kitchen floor and make a prediction, but I'm not going to write an encyclopedia article about it.Slithymatt 20:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Enough BS Articles
Talk:U.S. Air Force aeronautical rating

message: I know it may at times appear that the planet is under American rule, but in deference to the 170-180 odd other airfroces of earth, how about a title change to USAF Aeronautical Ratings or similar?  :-).Winstonwolfe 06:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name, July 2007

message: (Note: Graduates of the 4-year Aerospace Medicine Residency (RAM) had been automatically awarded Aeronautical Orders (AOs) to wear the Chief Flight Surgeon wings upon graduation from the RAM program. This may have changed after 2001)
Moved this text out of the article to here for discussion.  Did some quick searching but was unable to come up with a WP:CITE or WP:REF for this. — MrDolomite • Talk 06:43, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have gone through the current AFI para by para and the criteria for Chief Flight Surgeon is as shown. (AFI leaves nothing to supposition.) Without a source, it has to be considered no longer valid.--Reedmalloy (talk) 07:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chief Flight Surgeon
Talk:Ian Moore (singer)

message: I believe his main article should be under "musician" rather than "singer," as he is a very skilled guitarist, often compared to Stevie Ray Vaughan, and not of particular notice for his vocals. RttlesnkeWhiskey 05:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Instead of "Ian Moore (singer)", wouldn't "Ian Moore (musician)" be more appropriate?  Seeing as how he doesn't just sing.  4RM0 (talk) 04:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name change?
Talk:Air Force Religious Pin

message: I'd like to recommend this page be turned into a redirect page to United States military chaplain symbols. This article does not have references, plus --although created in good faith--really includes some basic errors. Looking at Badges of the United States Air Force, it is clear that Chaplain Corps insignia are not "Air Force religious pins," but instead occupational badges. More importantly, though, since this has no references and info on the subject is included in the symbols article, what do others think of making it a redirect page?  (I think I could do this myself, but did not want to do it without a consensus.) Thanks for considering this idea! NearTheZoo (talk) 11:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommendation this be deleted or changed into a redirect page
Talk:Tibia (video game)/v79updatetemp

message: On December 15, 2006, the Pits of Inferno was introduced, as well as the famous 'Dream Challenge' which allows one to join the (K?)Nightmare Knights and fight for good, or join the Brotherhood of Bones and help raise hell.  Characters now have a quest log, allowing them to see information on major quests they have started or completed (Desert Dungeon, Paradox Tower, Djinn Factions, Post Officer).  Houses were upgraded so litter bins and ovens were removed, and can be bought from furniture stores, in addtion, window shutters were added to keep unwanted garbage out of houses. Banks were added in Rookgaard, and all the mainland cities, located at the current NPCs where you change gold. A Rookgaard Trade Channel was also introduced to keep the selling and buying of items separate from the mainland. New items were introduced and so were new monsters. New monsters that were introduced can all be found in the Pits of Inferno except a select few, those being Nomads, who will roam the desert of Darama, and Wyverns, who can be found all over Tibia.
And finally, another feature to help stop cheaters was introduced. When you eat food, your character makes an eating sound (Yum, Crunch, etc). 
[no citation for this]This helps cut back on macroers, but is also being looked upon by CIP, because it spams to much.
Dominixis 06:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Christmas 2006 Update (version 7.83)
Talk:Special relativity/Archive 5

message: An anonymous editor using IP address 68.0.143.223 has changed this article and General relativity to stress prior contributions of Lorentz, Hilbert, and Poincare.  Please be aware that exactly how to briefly describe the development of gtr and str is contentious.  That is, there is substantial agreement among historians of science on the basis issues, but some cranky claims that Einstein "stole" from Hilbert, or his first wife Mileva, or whomever, have currency among certain individuals.   For this reason, editors should not make such changes without discussion on the appropriate talk pages.---CH 05:35, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: CV is very right about how contentious it is, and he/she demonstrates it perfectly by trying to suggest that the view of some historians is that of "certain" "cranky" "individuals" -- a tendentious, POV approach. However, the Wikipedia policy can prevent problems: just stick to reliable sources, without ignoring notable differing opinions. Harald88 14:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Related to this, what do you think of this edit by an anonymous contributor, suggesting "that the work of Carathéodory help shape some of Albert Einstein's theories". It has enough details to make me think that the fact are probably correct (though I didn't check anything). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 16:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is out of character with the rest of the article, and reads "possible hoax" to me.  My temptation is to move it to the talk page and call for citations backing the claim up. --EMS | Talk 02:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priority, ad nauseum 

message: I'm not sure about this. I left the section in, because it seems there's a real NPOV here- there really are quite a lot of people who don't understand relativity and make honest but usually ignorant criticism of the theory. Perhaps we should move it into a separate article? (Having said this, I am quite reluctant to do this, but generally the experience in the wikipedia of this kind of thing has not been too bad at all, but nevertherless I am still a bit nervous.)WolfKeeper 01:26, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The section that starts "The German scientist group g.o.mueller..." in the current revision is very odd indeed. It's also pretty incoherent. It looks like it's been machine translated from German (or possibly Italian) without any editing at all. It appears to be a POV rather than a serious attempt to add to a critical analysis of the issues; the suggested search for a link (and why not the link itelf?) at  times out, so I can't do a better analysis of this. The Google cache of this page is most peculiar.  --Alex 21:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of Relativity Theory