lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ohio Fireworks Derecho

message: A colleague of mine was an eye-witness to this event. (Actually, two, but one does not wish to go on record.) He is willing to provide a written account of what he experienced, for inclusion in this article. He understands that, while he is providing this information anonymously, with me as his interlocutor, his account will be subject to any necessary adjustments to bring it more in line with Wikipedia standards.
I explained to him that the best information is objective, although subjective information might be prefaced with phrases like "one witness observed" or some such.
I can provide an image of his written account, for an editor who wishes to verify it. For the sake of convenience and reference, I will also include a text version of it on this page.
96.14.149.140 (talk) 06:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eye-witness account

message: Six tornadoes were spawned by this storm including an F3 tornado in Flat Rock, Michigan. I don't really know if the tornadoes were actually spawned by the derecho. I know that on July 15, 1980 the Western Wisconsin Derecho spawned ten tornadoes (maximum F3 strength) in Eau Claire, Wisconsin and on September 7, 1998 the New York City Labor Day Derecho spawned four tornadoes including an F2 tornado in Lynbrook, New York. So I don't see how the tornadoes wouldn't have been associated with this storm. The 1969 Flat Rock, Michigan tornado, the 1980 F3 Eau Claire, Wisconsin tornado and the 1998 Lynbrook tornado all caused between 500,000 and 5 million dollars in property damage.--Kevjgav (talk) 17:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Six tornadoes spawned by storm
Talk:Dave Bampton

message: My fellow National Conference football fans. Please speak up and add your opinions with regards to the deletion of current and former Tamworth players.
Ytny is trying to get as many player pages deleted as possible. I believe he must be either a Burton Albion or Nuneaton Borough fan, this would give some form of an explaination for what he is doing.
Now most of these players have played in the top three English football leagues and yes even in some of the recent FA Cup games, but this is not going to save them if Ytny gets his way.
I understand some of the people who will be reading this are not a Tamworth fan, but please look at it this way, next time it could be your team, so please show your support.
Tamworth is now full time football club, not part time, so why are these players even be considered for deletion?
Hopefully Wikipedia will be around in the next 50/100+ years and I think some of these pages could be educational for the future generations. These players are part of history don't let some people spoil it for me and you, and the future generations.
Thanks for reading my friends. Jonesy702 22:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bampton counts as notable as he played league games for Swindon. If a player has only played in the Conference or below then the guidelines state that they have to go (not that I agree with that and won't prod them myself). The rule at the moment is to have played in a fully professional league i.e. you need to get a few more to go full-time and you're sorted. Either way, it's not a candidate for speedy deletion. WikiGull 14:04, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sonic Jump

message: Why is this specific game getting a page to itself while no other mobile phone games are? --Ragey 23:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is about an insignificant cellphone game. Other Sonic cellphone games do not have an article (and might I add, they shoudn't get one). This also offers nothing to limited information. This qualifies for speedy deleation. Please discuss. (NOTE: I don't no how to nominate for deleation. So, bear with me.). UnDeRsCoRe 00:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleation?

message: I know for a fact that Sonic Jump (and its sequel, which isn't mentioned here) was not exclusive to T-Mobile. I had it on an LG phone from Verizon. Furthermore, I doubt that it was developed specifically for that platform. Regardless, the Joystiq article that was cited didn't actually say what phones did and did not support it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.22.211.144 (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you find any references for this stuff? I'd gladly work it into the article if there are some reliable sources that back it up. Sergecross73 msg me  18:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

text: To be clear, even now, it doesn't state that it was released exclusively anywhere, its merely that Verizon is the only one mentioned by name. Just listing one doesn't mean it's exclusive necessarily, it's just the only one anyone has bothered to verify with a source. If you prefer, we could reword it to say something more like "Phone such as the Verizon...etc", but I don't think removing it outright is the right approach. Rather than going with a generic label of "mobile phones", I feel like we should just list which ones are supported. (On a general level, like how we list out iOS, not every variation of an iPhone.) Verizon is verified by the Joystiq source, and Joystiq doesn't need to give their source because they are the source, so it shouldn't be removed. Feel free to add reliable sources for other phone platforms supported. Sergecross73 msg me  13:52, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: T-Mobile Confusion
Talk:Ekla Chalo Re

message: Is it worth including a literal translation of the Bengali?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.214.168.3 (talk) 09:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Translation 
Talk:Utah State Route 71

message: The bridge carrying SR-71 over Big Cottonwood Creek is dated 1964. Since that part of 700 East/Van Winkle Expressway is shown as proposed on  (1963), that was the first bridge in that location. (The legal definition was changed in 1957 to follow 700 East.) --NE2 04:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anwar Kamal Khan

message: This article, though replete with bad English, was cleaned by me many times but an anonymous editor reverts back my edits. That anonymous editor adds some stuff which makes this article otherwise a perfect candidate for AFD due to vanity reasons. -- Marwatt 23:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a claim in this article that "Mr. Anwar Kamal Khan alone has the authority and power to lead the Qabaili Lashkar [Group of Tribesmen (Tribal Warriors)]". Since I am myself a Marwat, therefore, I would like to challenge this assertion of yours. I would like to ask you to go throught the well reserached article on Marwat available on none other than our very own Wikipedia. There is documented history over there which does not subscribe to your claim. -- Marwatt 03:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veracity of Claims 

message: Sign by adding ~~~~ so we know who you are! Corpx 23:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please sign your posts!! 

message: What and where is the discussion, regarding insertion of dispute and accuracy tag?
The user must carefully read the refernce links before citing any tag. --Marwat786 (talk) 17:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wake up man, to hell with with User:Marwat786 I am LineofWisdom and will remain LineofWisdom. I would like to warn you to please do not insert the tag again, otherwise I will ask wikipedia for your deletion. You must read the references before citing anything. --LineofWisdom (talk) 18:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What
Talk:Deadlock (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: Okay, bear with me.
Undamage Ship: Kim and Naomi go to Damaged Ship while Vidians attack Undamaged. This article seems to suggest Kes and Samanatha Wildman from Undamaged specifically die on-screen, instead of 'Off' when Undamaged goes kablooey. I don't remember this at all. Did their deaths happen on screen?? It just doesn't seem like something the producers would do, blatantly killing off duplicates of two of beautiful female recurring characters.
Lots42 23:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: It seems  this episode has been drawn into the debate on the Harry Kim (Star Trek) discussion page, namely who (and which ship) is real. Lots42 (talk) 05:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the record 

message: The original Harry and Naomi die. The duplicates, from the UNDAMAGED ship, go over to the heavily damaged one. The undamaged one destroys itself to save the damaged one. Why things keep getting reverted confuses me. Lots42 (talk) 23:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: Sorry but Voyager wasn't duplicated by the proton bursts but by an anomoly called a subspace divergence field, also known as a spatial scission, which they encounted when they where passing through another anomoly called a plasma drift while attempting to escape the Vidiian starship.
The use of the proton bursts was an attempt to compensate for a drain in their antimatter supply, which was caused by the duplicate Voyager, "Like Siamese twins linked together at the heart" as one of the characters puts it. As one of the Voyagers started the procedure before the other, the proton bursts caused severe damage to the other Voyager.
Scotius (talk) 13:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause For Voyager Duplication
Talk:Dave Malone

message: First of all.....Great work here, Chris.  I made a few minor (one style and one grammar) corrections recently but failed to log in so my IP address is what showed up.  Just setting the record straight. 
The grammar correction was on the sentence regarding Dave's collaborations.  Filled in a verb in the reference to "......and some zydeco with Chubby Carrier".  I used "performed some zydeko..." as it was difficult to ascertain what role Dave played on the Chubby album from a web search.  If he co wrote with Chubby than obviously the word would need correction. 
BrianO 05:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, my original article has been pretty much replaced completely by Penny Pearson working with, um, Dave Malone.  I started to do a little copyediting myself, and got a chiding email from Penny who said that while she understood the open nature of the Wiki, she wanted to let me know that Dave was upset.  Personally, I'm torn, because this is valuable information (albeit from a primary source), and I would love to be able to cite it, but as it stands, it violates all sorts of Wikipedia policy and guidelines. My plan at some point is to recover the raw, unedited Penny/Dave version from the history, post that on some other site, and then use it as a reference in a more encyclopedic article here.  But since there's no deadline for bringing this up to Wikipedia standards, I'm not in a rush.  Xtifr tälk 08:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Identification
Talk:Logic in China

message: I think this article is a bit inadequate. Can we have someone who is an expert in this field expand it? 24630 23:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: It would be interesting to have some sort of treatment of China's attitude to marxist leninist proletarian logic. 22:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  proletarian logic
Talk:Catgut

message: The word kit does not come into common usage until  a long time after cat lines are refered to. "Cat" being an abbreviation of the place from which the best gut string ropes were manufactured. Plain gut strings are used by strings players playing historical instruments (rebec, vielle, viol, violin). It only really diminished its use on violins after the 1960s and the introduction of synthetic core strings by Thomastik Dominant.
--Barryspearce (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Catgut isn't used for sutures anymore, to the best of my knowledge - they are virtually all synthetic, with silk being used occasionally. The reference given dates from 1944 (added 16:05, 14 May 2009 by 86.165.85.222)
:Not so sure about that... googling "gut sutures" returns plenty of hits, such as this one. __Just plain Bill (talk) 20:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not used for sutures

message: The first step in processing the intestine is ___ ?  Cutting in strips?  Boiling?  How is fat removed?  What tissue makes the end product?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.23.7 (talk) 04:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Process particulars?

message: The article says that the intestines are soaked in alkaline lye.  If you click on the link for lye, you find that lye is alkaline.  I'd take the redundant word out myself, but I was wondering if there's a good reason for using it.JDZeff (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you're right.  I've adjusted the wording. 86.7.30.217 (talk) 20:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy? 

message: The attribution of steel string development to the Martin company is inaccurate, despite various print sources making this claim. Martin was a very important force in the evolution of fretted instruments (though selling only a fraction of Lyon & Healy's total output), and so they certainly played a role. But the change in the Martin line from gut to steel strings, though an important trend reflecting popular demand, was not due to a Martin innovation. Steel strings had been used on fretted instruments as early as the 18th century, as can be seen in more thorough historical sources (cf. Tony Bacon, George Gruhn).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.53.76.153 (talk) 22:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guitar reference 

message: No evidence given for a Welsh origin for 'kit'. Authority cited makes no such claim 217.43.164.249 (talk) 11:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology (2)
Talk:2005 in aviation

message: :"A small plane carrying cargo for FedEx, including six vials of research viruses, crashed in downtown Winnipeg. The only woman on board, the pilot, was killed but there were no injuries on the ground."
Just wondering if there was anyone else but the pilot on board. If so, then the fact that she was the only woman on board seems nothing more than sensationalism. (Born2flie 23:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: October 6
Talk:Yvain, the Knight of the Lion

message: Copied from my talk page:
I appreciate that you cannot accept original research, and I don't really care that my paragraph about the issue of the proper translation of the title of Chretien's Yvain and its implications for interpretation is not acceptable, but what I said about the translation itself is not original research, it is a fact.  Every other translator I know, except for Burton Raffel, rightly translates "au" as "with" (check William Kibler, Ruth Harwood Cline, even the old W.W. Comfort).  If Chretien had wanted it to be "of," he would have used "du."  This is a distinction that was true in Old French and is still true today, as any Frenchman would affirm.  Every medieval French scholar and Arthurian is aware of the proper translation of "au" in this context, so much so that nobody has needed to write about it. Nevertheless, every time Wikipedia translates the title as The Knight of the Lion, both in the article on the romance and in the article on Chretien de Troyes, it is perpetuating an error.
Thank you.
Alanbaragona (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Have these other translators published translations of "Yvain", or works about it? Has any scholar published comments on Burton Raffel's choice of title? These would be the reliable sources you need to change the article title at Wikipedia. I don't know the subject at all; I only got as far as seeing Amazon.com's image of the front cover with his chosen title. -- John of Reading (talk) 18:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The scholars seem to be about split between "Knight with the Lion" and "Knight of the Lion". I don't think it's a matter of error; it's a matter of which form gets the sense better in the opinion of the translator, the direct translations (with) or the less direct (of). And it's not only translators who are split, but also scholars discussing or referencing the work, etc., dealing with the later adaptations, etc. I don't know how we should determine which is to be preferred, but it seems to me that one is not obviously more preferable in the sources compared to others.--Cúchullain t/c 19:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the English translation of the title
Talk:Solidus

message: They are distinct, as mentioned on both pages, so I've added a link to the actual solidus. I left the link to the slash, as many people use "solidus" to mean "slash", but it is reasonably likely that they actually wanted the real solidus. Goyston (talk) (contribs) 14:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Solidus versus Slash

message: Why are there two links to the same article on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrwhizzard (talk • contribs) 2 October 2007
:There are no longer two links to Solidus (punctuation). DH85868993 (talk) 10:02, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two links to Solidus (punctuation)?
Talk:My Three Suns

message: It should be noted that this episode is the only time that Elzar uses Emeral's catchphase "kick it up a notch" as apposed to his parody catchphase "knock it up a notch". Sarujo 07:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elzar Catchphase 

message: As I recently brought up at the wikiproject (here) it is time we did something about the cultural references sections. I am moving all unsourced references to the talk pages for the time being in hopes of creating a better, more thoroughly sourced article. Please discuss this action at the wikiproject link above so as not to split it over 72 different talk pages. The information removed from the article follows. Stardust8212 02:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references 

message: This episode, along with all other episodes from season one, is being reviewed to determine whether it currently satisfies Wikipedia's various policies in guidelines. All editors are welcome and encouraged to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama/Season 1 review. Stardust8212 18:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode review
Talk:A Big Piece of Garbage

message: *Wernstrom says "Au Revoir" although it was stated in "A Clone of My Own" that French was a dead language.
Also in the countdown to the year 3000 the French people say "seven".("Space Pilot 3000")
Isn't that just a brag to his intelligence, the same way speaking Latin in our age would be? 70.130.244.51 05:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It could also be considered a loan word which it has been established are still in use. Stardust8212 12:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuity

message: I removed this fact:
"When the ship is advancing towards the garbage ball, it looks similar to the meteor from Final Fantasy VII after a rocket is sent to blow it up."
While that would be a really really cool thing that the makers of the best cartoon ever appreciate the best game ever, looking at the video of the rocket launch, i see very little similarity.
Tommyhaych 18:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loose Reference? 

message: As I recently brought up at the wikiproject (here) it is time we did something about the cultural references sections. I am moving all unsourced references to the talk pages for the time being in hopes of creating a better, more thoroughly sourced article. Please discuss this action at the wikiproject link above so as not to split it over 72 different talk pages. The information removed from the article follows. Stardust8212 02:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references 

message: This episode, along with all other episodes from season one, is being reviewed to determine whether it currently satisfies Wikipedia's various policies in guidelines. All editors are welcome and encouraged to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama/Season 1 review. Stardust8212 18:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode review 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Urectum and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#Urectum until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Urectum" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hot Rod (2007 film)

message: Information requires more verification. Danny 00:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does Rod contemplate in the forest? Suicide? Buying a new car?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.85.81 (talk) 23:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word missing in plot summary? 

message: The Quotes section seems a bit unorthodox for a Wikipedia article. Looks to me like a bunch of Hot Rod fans just wrote down some of their favorites. I've never seen a quote section designed like this... -tbone (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  quotes section 

message: Metacritic says reviews were "mixed or average" that's a direct quote. Yet somehow this article said it had "generally mixed reviews" which is not a phrase that Metacritic uses (and as far I recall has never used). There was even a quote in the wiki source claiming that this misquote is "CITED TERMINOLOGY, DO NOT CHANGE!" and from a brief look at the history of this article it seems to have been this way for years. I'm going to correct the text so that it does not misquote Metacritic. -- 109.78.201.233 (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I traced both the warning and the misquote back to 2014 and a single large edit that extensively rewrote the article. Someone that actually liked this film might want to check that edit didn't introduce other more subtle mistakes. BTW, if you check using the Web Archive you can see that "generally mixed" was definitely not a wording that Metacritic used in 2014 it was "mixed or average" then too, and it was "mixed or average" in 2010. -- 109.78.201.233 (talk) 11:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed or average reviews
Talk:409 Tactical Fighter Squadron

message: Why is the title of this page "No. 409 Squadron RCAF"?  Shouldn't it be "409 Squadron" to simplify the search process. Stemcat 17:47, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Science Hill High School

message: SHHS is grades 8-12, not 9-12, as you corrected.  See http://www.jcschools.org/shhs/
Bokonon6 00:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

message: The school is less than 50 years old. As I understand it this is one of the prime criteria for whether a grade school can have it's own page or not. At the very least the page should be merged with it's school district, but the school district is not mentioned in the article. Add to this the recent addition of a personal photo (almost certainly taken by or actually OF :User:cleanyounglady and I have to suggest this page should be removed.
Bill W. Smith, Jr. 22:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  candidate for deletion or merging? 

message: Some student band keeps making edits to this page, promoting their CD and reverting useful edits. Also, Jared Ongie is not yet notable enough to be included here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.114.122.22 (talk) 01:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feeding the Milkman 

message: Recent editing of information in the Science Hill High School Site was done by the Science Hill High School Administration and will be monitored in the future.
SHHS Administration  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tks822 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science Hill Site