lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:5-polytope

message: I copied the definition section from polychoron, upgrading the dimensions.
I'm not sure I'm content with #2: Adjacent hypercells are not in the same four-dimensional hyperplane.
Perhaps this criterion is a way to separate polytopes from tilings. It may be a definition for a convex polytope, but not a general polytope!
I'll put a note in talk for polychoron as well. Tom Ruen 01:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: I've got an in-progress complete table at  User:Tomruen/uniform polyteron (In parallel form as tables of Uniform polychoron). Tom Ruen (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniform 5-polytopes (polyterons) 

message: I removed this. I couldn't find any reference where it was used and no reference offered. (so far!) Tom Ruen (talk) 03:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose it: I have more than a minor in math.--Dchmelik (talk) 06:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: An encyclopedia is not where you propose names for things... It would do wonders for the usefulness of this (and similar pages) if made-up words were reduced to the ideal minimum of zero! Mariano (talk) 13:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   polyktiria? 

message: Why in the table in right column is "Any regular 4-polytope" but not "Any regular 5-polytope"? And similar to the bottom. Maksim-e (talk) 19:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Typos from copying. Thanks! Tom Ruen (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "Notes on the Wythoff construction for the uniform 5-polytopes" 

message: does not intersect itself looks ambiqious...
Vertex intersects with edge? Edge intersects with face? Jumpow (talk) 21:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It says this for convex cases "...its boundary (including its cells, faces and edges) does not intersect itself" The boundary is made of cells, faces, edges, and vertices. If any two elements intersect each other its not, convex, like a pentagram is self-intersecting, edges intersect each other. Tom Ruen (talk) 21:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

text: More accurately, polytope terminology uses the idea of incidence of the elements rather than their intersection. Incidence is closer to the geometrical idea of tangency than of intersection: a vertex is incident with an edge, an edge is incident with a face. The term "intersection" is used only for the object as a whole. For a face and one of its edges to actually intersect, the face has to be a star polygon, which is self-intersecting. To explain all this every time convexity is briefly explained would make such articles tedious. Rather, we accept that one of the possible meanings is mathematical nonsense as you observe, while the other makes sense: as is very common in English prose, we credit the reader with the intelligence to reject the nonsensical interpretation. HTH — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. I undestood... Keyword there is itself, separately from other elements. Jumpow (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambigious definition
Talk:Nancy Coover Andreasen

message: I wonder why there is no date of birth.. --CopperKettle (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate? 

message: It is said in one work that they were re-introduced by Strauss\Carpenter\Bartko in 1974. --CopperKettle (talk) 07:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative symptoms 

message: Negative symptoms and positive symptoms, everything a schizophrenic does is a symptom.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.160.92.125 (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symptoms 
Talk:Suzuki GSX-R600

message: I created the article today with 2006/2007 spec information, an infobox, one image, some external links, and some history. Someone please help expand out the history of the bike. Roguegeek 03:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The amount of text about the suspension is too much for the table. Should it be cut down to match the 1997-2000 entry?GGink (talk) 14:59, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspension 

message: Please note that the power figures cited are all tested at the rear wheel, not net engine power.
This is significant because of European motorcycle licensing categories. I've edited it to a simple, factual "rear wheel power" and would very much appreciate having it kept as that. Rogerborg (talk) 11:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not all tested at the rear wheel. For the 2006 GSX-R600, figure of 106.09 specifies BHP (i.e. crankshaft output), not HP (net or rear wheel horsepower). See Brake horsepower. I've once again verified by checking with the original source, Cycle World, July 2006. I would certainly prefer to only cite tested RWHP, but unfortunately we don't always have good sources for every model year, and so we have to make do with BHP.<P>If you have a source for the tested RWHP for this bike, please go ahead and replace it here. But even then, we will continue to mix hp and bhp for the power row of tables like this, because it's better than nothing. Anyone who is going to make an important decision about whether they're qualified to ride a bike ought to have enough sense to understand how horsepower is measured and the important distinctions between units. Moreover, anyone who buys a bike thinking it's under the European limit based solely on what they read in Wikipedia has only themselves to blame. Who in 2015 is that ignorant about the reliability of what you find on an open wiki? If they're old enough for a bike license they're old enough to follow the links and read the cited source for themselves. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:28, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power figures 

message: Looking for a 600 100.40.200.89 (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do you do finance
Talk:Palm Tran

message: If anyone can expand on the history it would be greatly appreciated. 
Firerescuelieut 03:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i think someone should put a picture of a Palm Tran bus here  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.108.218.230 (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture
Talk:Logos Bible Software

message: This article is written like an advertisement and needs lots of rewriting.. IE: "incorporating elegant design, powerful features, and Internet integration." and no sources for the first paragraph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Japerry007 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: Removed deletion proposal. Logos Bible Software is quite well known in Christian circles. It is certainly not non-notable. -- Canar 03:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion

message: I think this article is confused about its subject.  The first paragraph seems to indicate the article is about the software, but the rest of the article is about the company. Valrith 13:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject of this article 

message: The photos in this article are so embarrassingly bad. They are so small that you can't really see anything at all. They need fixing.  Theoretically people here want to promote is app right? Well here's something practical you can do.
Lehasa (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns

message: This article's content is too narrow for its title.  One of two things needs to be done.  Either the title needs to be modified to reflect the fact that the article only describes a very particular aspect of the Ancients-vs.-Moderns debate, or the content needs to be considerably expanded.  
Historically, the debate between Ancients and Moderns goes back to the beginning of the Renaissance, was pan-European in scope, and was conducted (at first) principally in the Latin language.
Zakethtrarr (talk) 12:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title vs. Content:  Title Misleading, Content Too Narrow
Talk:Wax fire

message: Ok so i found a little more on this event, but i've just started using wiki and am not sure of proper protocol. If someone could possibley clean this page up and make it look neater that would be helpful. Rabid9797 03:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

message: After Kvng's advice, I have made this article a redirect to Boilover § Slopover. Further, after consideration, I could not see how any text could be salvaged for a merge, as all the concepts are explained in the slopover section of Boilover. Other concepts can be found under Chip pan, which is linked to from Boilover. Some statements in the article were plain wrong (there is no chemical reaction involved) and the clip included is hardly educational, showing a very dangerous act. JudeFawley (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Made it a redirect
Talk:Carl Danberg

message: Presently seeking proper permission for photograph. stilltim 11:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Photo is fair use in this case, IMO Brian 15:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  photograph 
Talk:Washington, D.C., in the American Civil War

message: The article says that the Confederates wished to make Washington their capital, but no source is given.  I have never heard that.  I always heard that a condition for Virginia joining the CSA was that Richmond be made the capital.  Emperor001 (talk) 19:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Confederate Capital
Talk:Upper Newport Bay

message: Both the Upper Bay (locally referred to as the "Back Bay") and Newport Bay proper were originally formed by the Santa Ana River.  The river's natural course was diverted to where it now flows between the city boundaries of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach.  When the river was diverted (year???), the "Back Bay" began to silt up to a backwater estuary.
At one point, there was a salt works there, until the great flood (30's?) wiped it out, although the dikes and some cement fixtures can still be seen.  As late as the 60's, cow carcasses from the Irvine ranch, and oranges from groves, would wash down the upper bay into Newport Bay.
Different approaches to the process of silting have been implemented over the decades.  In the 60's, the back bay was kept dredged to allow for water skiing.  In the '70's, it was recognized as a significant element of the migratory pathway for birds along the West Coast, and a laissez faire approach was implemented, allowing a "natural" process.  However, as there was no longer a river to keep the channel free, the silt stopped the "breathing" of Newport Bay, the flow of fresh sea water, oxygen and nutrients into that environment, and the outflow of pollutants, and the once diverse ecosystem of Newport Bay largely collapsed.  Over the later years of the 70's and the 80's, with eco-conscious groups like SPON (Stop Polluting Our Newport), dredging was re-established, and a balance was attained.  Today, life forms such as octopus are begining to reappear in the bay, signaling a return to a more healthy ecosystem.
(Sorry, no documentation/citations for this, but if someone wants, I know it's not hard to find.  I did my "book reports" long ago, and don't have the time currently to redo them, sorry.)
(Cuchulainshound (talk) 01:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional History
Talk:Baba Sy

message: I put him on bio-stub, whereas I did not with similarly short checker player articles, because he seems unusual here in one way. That being there seems to be few to no articles on African players in chess or backgammon. Checking :Category:Chess players by nationality and :Category:Backgammon players I didn't find any African nations as subcategories. Just search "grandmaster" Africa(n) got me a few possibilities from North Africa, but I don't think I found much sub-Saharan. I found an article about the South African Chess Championship, but the only winner to have his own article is a German-Jewish immigrant to South Africa. Not trying to be PC, I just know African coverage is at times spotty. I'm not sure this could be expanded, but if so it might be a good thing on that front.--T. Anthony 03:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To update there is now a :Category:Egyptian chess players, :Category:Moroccan chess players, :Category:South African chess players, and :Category:Zambian chess players.--T. Anthony (talk) 02:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fernando Pérez (director)

message: I am thinking of importing/translating the full filmography from the ICAIC website.  Thoughts ? -- Beardo 03:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's not directly copied-and-pasted, I think that any content would greatly contribute to the article. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!)  01:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography
Talk:Newport Back Bay

message: A few brand new editors have become active on this article recently.  Is this a school project?  If so, please review Wikipedia:School and university projects. 72Dino (talk) 04:33, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  School project? 
Talk:Fruitport, Michigan

message: Two incorporation dates, any references? Rfrisbietalk 03:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Romig's Michigan Place Names it was incorporated as a village in 1891. It was renamed Fruitport from Crawville in 1869. I'll update this later with a full reference when I get a chance. Heh, I just noticed that the with the exception of the mistaken date, the addition is taken almost word for word from Romig. older ≠ wiser 12:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1869 or 1891? 
Talk:Brooke Anderson

message: https://www.topcelebritynetworths.com/profile/brooke-anderson-net-worth  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:A700:A7E:516F:9C73:CD5C:2C39 (talk) 18:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Here is a more current picture.

message: Did she go to catholic school in New Jersey? 69.142.93.20 (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar school
Talk:Singapore Slingers

message: I think the team history should be changed. They bought the licence from the Hunter Pirates, but I don't really see them as a continuation of them. Does anyone have a source to confirm or deny that?
Also, it appears Phillips are the major sponsor. But I will try and find a source for that before I put it up. Aceboy 04:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: They bought the licence. That hardly makes them the same team. How does the import rule work for a team in a foreign country? It appears they have two Americans (the imports) but also locals and someone from India. I imagine the rule is different for them because of their location. Does this advantage them to the Australasian clubs? Dankru 07:29, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Import rules

message: I'm not sure if this is useful, but :File:Singapore Slingers vs Darwin All-stars.jpg may be useful to this article. Bawolff (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Ted Malone

message: This article is a possible copyright violation. I found similar content at , where a number of sentences are the same. The article has more content than included at the website, so multiple websites may have been used as reference for this article. --Tewy 04:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyright violation removed. --Tewy 22:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation
Talk:Peter Lougheed Provincial Park

message: In response to a request for a photo I have uploaded one of my photos of Upper Kananaskis Lake to the Wikipedia Commons area. It is entitled U-Kananaskis-Lk-Szmurlo.jpg. I do not have sufficient expertise to intelligently add it to the article. Cszmurlo 03:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done, thanks. --Qyd 03:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Linzi, Zibo

message: *Merge. I asked to merge Linzi to Linzi District. Linzi is just the name of Linzi District. It should be merged to the History section of Linzi District. --Neo-Jay (talk) 08:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Linzi which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:30, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Dhofar Governorate

message: Details about the Anti-Gravity Point at Mirbat Road. What is the scientific explanation of anti-gravity theory there?
A useful, even essential addition to this article is Rex Smith's, Zafar, in the Encyclopedia of Islam, vol. 9, 2001, 380-1 regarding medieval Zafar. Azd0815 (talk) 07:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The article says: "...The Burj-al-Nadha Clock-tower is a popular landmark and is featured in the Dhofar Municipality coat of arms(right)..." but there's not any image of coat of arms or anu clock tower, and even I don't know what is "Dhofar Municipality" (Salalah?). I doub also about the long ottomans rule stated (1539–1829) that is not quoted in Encyclopaedia of Islam.--95.17.88.104 (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Image missing and ottoman rule
Talk:Wooler

message: Wooler, Northumberland → Wooler– To reflect main use of this word. Saga City 04:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support, seems logical to me. johnwalton (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: * The request succeeded. --Dijxtra 09:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I believe the Dalziel brothers, famous Victorian artists, were also born in Wooler. (46.204.87.145 (talk) 19:16, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dalziel brothers
Talk:Ad:tech

message: Right now this isn't an article, it's a company advertisement.  In order to remain on Wikipedia, verifiable references need to be provided, such as links to books or news articles which refer to this company, to prove that the company is "notable" per WP:CORP.  If verifiable references cannot be provided, the article should be deleted. --Elonka 04:29, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion

message: Please see WP:MOS and WP:ADVERT. Flowanda | Talk 10:10, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 2009 edits 
Talk:Daniel Kerr

message: Sources should be cited.  Especially important because this fits in the category Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.  See Wikipedia:No original research for further explanation.  Syndicalista 05:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: Daniel Kerr is not aborigional at all, his roots are from sri lanka
* Do we have a source for either? Spindocbob 10:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh.... 
Talk:Maestà

message: "Madonna with child (Jesus)" seems redundant and awkward, as "Madonna and child" is well-known as a description of paintings of Mary with young Jesus, and the Madonna (art) article should clarify the matter for anyone who was uncertain.  This is an aesthetic judgement call, but I would tend to omit the explanatory "(Jesus)" myself. -- Xtifr 04:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I removed the parenthetical Jesus and made the child link to the Jesus page.  Any problem with this new set up? Pnkrockr 15:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Clever!  I like it.  :)  Xtifr tälk 07:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is "Maestà ("Majesty"), the Italian word for sovereign" correct? - I think it is the Italian word for "majesty".  Johnbod 17:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. "Sovereign" is "sovrano". Changed. Twirling 17:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Kurt Akeley

message: Kurt Akeley no longer works at Microsoft. If anyone can find a source verifying this, that would be great. I cannot edit the article since I am to closely related to him. IluvSD40s (talk) 02:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Occupation
Talk:Singapore Prison Service

message: This article was being requested at the SGpedians' notice board. Anyone with more information about the subject in question is encouraged to contribute here. --Siva1979Talk to me 04:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requestd
Talk:Cowpasture River

message: "There is an interesting story about how the Cowpasture and neighboring rivers the Bullpasture River and Calfpasture River came to be so named."
:I'd love to know the source of that story.  Never heard it before, but the names are intriguing. Pfly 05:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Xcelerator

message: Make it have compressed air lanch 2600:8801:BE11:AB00:3CD9:73D:D006:AA56 (talk) 06:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed 

message: Would it be better to change the status to "Standing But Not Operating" to make it a little bit more clear? My feel is that "Closed" implies that it will not be reopening ever. Since the fate of the ride is undecided and is technically possible that it gets repaired and reopened. BarkScheifele (talk) 06:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible change to Status of Ride
Talk:Portal vein/Archive 1

message: Portal vein most frequently refers to the hepatic one.  The contents I removed better fit into the article portal vein (vein type) or portal vein (type) or portal vein (type, unnamed)-- or just in the portal venous system article (as one rarely talks of an unnamed portal vein in isolation).  The article as it was written was about the type of vein (i.e. portal versus non-portal, systemic vs. pulmonary, deep vs. superficial)-- which is contrary to the popular usage. Nephron  T|C 16:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Making to disambig
Talk:Erk Russell

message: Thanks to those people who worked on creating the article. Capitalistroadster 05:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the information in The Miracle Worker be moved below The Letter as it pretty much deals exclusively with the Georgia Southern Eagles (the other portions deal with the Georgia Bulldogs)? I've been thinking about moving it. Reb 17:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Miracle Worker
Talk:Canon EOS-1N

message: For detailed technical information on the Canon EOS 1N and other cameras in the Canon EF line up, see the Malaysian Internet Resources (MIR) website, . 
A .pdf downloadable instruction book for the Canon EOS 1N can also be found on the mir.com.my website.
Garyh: Silent Street Photography, Geelong, Australia 23:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More information
Talk:Recreational drug tourism

message: How does this article relate to crime? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.236.89.44 (talk • contribs) 05:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crime

message: I was reading on the other page that Nimbin, New South Wales is a drug tourist place to visit is that true  or are the laws there the same as the rest of Australia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.66.212 (talk) 11:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nimbin 

message: That's funny that Jamaica isn't even mentioned in this article, being probably the most visited drug destiny along with Amsterdam.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.217.96.175 (talk) 06:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jamaica 

message: While the debate rages on regarding whether cannabis is addictive (though one could argue that people being driven to commit illegal acts or travel great distances in order to consume cannabis recreationally - as opposed to medically - could be seen as supporting one side of the argument), the fact "drugs tourism" in the context of this article does touch on travelling to obtain alcohol (verified addictive) and tobacco (ditto), have any studies been done to look at how much a role - if any - addictions play in driving drugs tourism? 70.72.211.35 (talk) 16:53, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addiction-related motivation? 

message: The Dutch article doesn't make sense naming drugs deaths for substances that are (both) highly illegal, also in the Netherlands. Why is this there without a relation to the rest of the Marijuana related text? 
2A02:A458:C30A:1:ACE5:20AF:4F06:1995 (talk) 08:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amsterdam deaths?