lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eastman Business Park

message: The last three paragraphs are copied from . This article needs a good rewrite, including adding mention of the former subway station.Autarch (talk) 10:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy & Paste 

message: Editors should be familiar with WP:NPOV - not to mention WP:SPAM.Autarch (talk) 20:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View
Talk:John Williams Walker

message: Hello, there is an article here, http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/face/Article.jsp?id=h-1181, that might merit an external link. Please review it and decided. Thanks, Justin --74.227.225.187 (talk) 16:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link?
Talk:LINC 4GL

message: An important strength, not so far listed, is that a LINC generated system never "crashes".  It may not do what you want but it always does something.  This allows you to debug/refine your business or GUI logic without getting bogged down in algorithmic failures.  This in turn strongly supports rapid prototyping with the end users well into the loop.
Another strength is that it hides the details of the database and the procedural language - in fact it hides the conventional separation between them.  A 4GL programmer no more needs to know those things than a 3GL programmer needs to know machine code. Optimal modelling of the LINC virtual machine onto the various features of specific platforms is a matter for the product developers.
The biggest weakness (in my 10+ years of LINC experience) is the lack of direct support for a single business transaction spanning multiple screens. The standard solutions (cookies, session tables in the database, etc.) have to be defined by the programmer for each application, whereas 'session' should have been an intrinsic concept like components and events.   
A naive LINC application will allow any event (transaction) to be entered at any time by any user.  A mature LINC application requires programmer code in every ispec (transaction definition) to manage/validate this.  Most programmers would begin by importing their screen navigation/session management code from a previous project.
Shannock9 (talk) 13:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally I agree - although I have crashed a few in my time - but anything we know from experience is original research. You'd have to be able to source your comments. -- Ian Dalziel (talk) 14:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Strengths and Weaknesses
Template talk:Citation needed/comparisions

message: This page is to display and show the various 'see also' templates referenced the template 'fact' page for ease of choice. This is  in appearance: Best regards // FrankB 19:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose

message: * Wikipedia:Citing sources   — 
# —  (deprecated) 
# —  , requesting clarification of a hard-to-understand phrase. 
# —  , tagging a request for citation, used for quotations that needs citations to make it complete, but not for seemingly doubtful or false texts. 
# —  , tagging a request for quoting inaccessible source, used for requesting a direct quote from the cited source for verification. 
# —  , tagging a request for source verification, used for information that is doubtful or appears false. 
# —  , tagging a request for source verification, used for information that is doubtful or appears false. 
# —  , popping up a box saying an article or section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations. This is an 'IN-YOUR-FACE' article tag, so not displayed in this sample of inline edit aids // FrankB
# —  , popping up a box saying an article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable. This is an 'IN-YOUR-FACE' article tag, so not displayed in this sample of inline edit aids // FrankB
# —  , popping up a box saying an article or section has no citation or reference for its information. This is an 'IN-YOUR-FACE' article tag, so not displayed in this sample of inline edit aids // FrankB
# —  , to label a passage of text that may be based upon original research. 
# —  , to request a missing page number to an existing reference. 
# — 
Hope these help // FrankB 19:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The 'See also' list
Talk:Michael Gerald Ford

message: He has the same pic as brother steve here, just so you know.68.36.63.126 (talk) 22:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are several known people named Michael Ford, so this article shouldn't about just one of them. Article about this one should be Michael Gerald Ford. Here is the text which was replaced with disambiguation page:
BEGIN TEXT
Michael Gerald Ford (b. March 14, 1950) is the oldest of four children of President Gerald R. Ford and First Lady Betty Ford.  
He is a minister, and currently leads the Office of Student Development, which oversees all student organizations at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. He is an alumnus of Wake Forest (BA, 1972) and Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary (MDiv, 1984). He was the president of Sigma Chi while a student at WFU.  President Ford, when he was still in Congress, spoke at his son's commencement.
He married Gayle Ann Brumbaugh (born 1951) on July 5, 1974. The Fords have three daughters, Sarah Joyce (born 1979), Rebekah Elizabeth (born 1982), and Hannah Gayle (born 1985).
===References===
*Wead, Doug, All the President's Children, Atria Books, New York, 2003, 
END TEXT
:: I reverted this for now.  It may be a good change but don't just go in and take out what people have worked on for months. and please sign your edits.  Pgc512 13:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess there are some more, a diambiguation page has been created Michael Ford. Jjmillerhistorian 00:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: *Wead, Doug, All the President's Children, Atria Books, New York, 2003, 
END TEXT
:: I reverted this for now.  It may be a good change but don't just go in and take out what people have worked on for months. and please sign your edits.  Pgc512 13:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess there are some more, a diambiguation page has been created Michael Ford. Jjmillerhistorian 00:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Lillian Garrett-Groag

message: I don't know Groag's date of birth, which is a requirement for any biography infobox. Therefore I've left out the infobox. In fact, this article has almost no basic biography info at all.  It does have the value of presenting information about Groag's professional work.  --Jdlh  | Talk 19:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic biography, infobox 

message: Is this the same person as this:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0308164/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.196.214.15 (talk) 21:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same person?
Talk:Royal tours of Australia

message: Looking for help in pinning down when and which royal visited around the middle of or late 1970s.
My recollection is I was a Brownie Guide or Girl Guide.  I don't think it was Princess Anne, because the visitor was most likely around Princess Margaret's age.
We were at Glengarry, the Brownie Guide and Girl Guide campsite in Turramurra, Sydney.
She might have planted a tree, and/or we might have buried a time capsule.
Anyone with a better recollection than mine?
Thanks. 49.185.138.95 (talk) 10:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help req'd: Visit of Princess Margaret(?) in Sydney (Australia) in mid 1970s 

message: : "[Queen Elizabeth II] is the only reigning monarch of Australia to have set foot on Australian soil"
Is this interpreted by most to mean "to have set foot on Australian soil while being the reigning monarch"?  Or does it need updating, since Charles III has set foot on Australian soil (even though he was not the monarch at the time)? -- Chuq (talk) 05:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only reigning monarch
Talk:Memento (film)/Archive 1

message: Good work, Ed. I started to read your additions thinking "Uh-oh, wasn't Memento more ambiguous than this? How can the contributor be so sure of the storyline." But then reading it through, I agree with the account, the ambiguouity merely a product of my own deficient understanding of a fairly complex film! Pete 07:57, 17 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 10:42, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Discussions
Talk:Romanian Orthodox Episcopate of America

message: the 'official site' pointed to by the link is called Romanian Orthodox Episcopate of America.  I wonder if this actual title shouldn't be the title of this article, which currently seems to be more like a subheading of an article called 'Dioceses of the OCA' rather than a freestanding article about a Church. Richardson mcphillips (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Beats me, why this Lemma was chosen. Fossa?! 02:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  name of Church and Article 

message: the map doesn't include British Columbia and Quebec.  I don't know how to edit a map.Richardson mcphillips (talk) 19:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  map is wrong
Talk:C2 domain

message: Some parts of this article written by user Biophys are taken from the following article http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/IEntry?ac=IPR000008 without permission.Vlad fedorov 19:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed this ^^^ Bassophile 10:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention! Plagiarism
Talk:List of Croatian films

message: I added criteria by which a film may be described as "Croatian". These are pretty arbitrary, but I'd say they are reasonable. I haven't checked, but probably all films presently in the list satisfy them. GregorB (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A language would also be a very reasonable criterion, but it's a bit too tricky. GregorB (talk) 18:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the above mentioned criteria. The archive.hr source is the criterion for inclusion. GregorB (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria
Talk:Pedro Menéndez de Avilés

message: Menéndez order that the survivors be "put to the sword". In other words... he ordered that they be killed. Why circumlocute? Just say "killed", rather than "put to the sword". Fuzzform (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP - no place for euphemisms 

message: The article, under "Family," contains a sentence fragment claiming that Pedro finally located his lost son: "and finally found his son Juan."  Is there a reference to back this up?
There's a nice outline of the entire family at http://www.euskalnet.net/laviana/gen_astures/aviles.htm .  It does not indicate that the son was found, and it offers no line of succession from the son, which seems unusual if he did indeed survive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.49.44 (talk) 08:34, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son (Juan) 

message: Apropos of nothing, on Wikipedia you find out who the real benefactors of humankind are. Carlstak (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Wikipedia 

message: Why did Spain settle St.Agustine Tatertot 07 (talk) 22:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  St.agustine
Talk:Selby High School

message: Hello, I have completely revamped this article as it contained a lot of irrelevant text and was aesthetically a mess. There are certain parts that could do with citation (marked) and I also think the existing sections should be expanded on, as below:
- More info on what was needed to Achieve Performing Arts Status
- Something about the friendly rivalry with Brayton
- Maybe something about the more successful sports teams or Alumini
Jedimasterdurex 19:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Yvonne Fair

message: I added a couple new bits and slightly revised some sentences, but the bulk of this article was still appropriated word-for-word from the All Music Guide entry for Yvonne Fair. InnocuousPseudonym 19:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ripped from AMG

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: There is no set year or period where she married Mr Fair or divorced him. 152.44.124.105 (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did she marry or divorce Leroy Fair?
Talk:Mormon fundamentalism/merged article talk page

message: Should this article be limited to polygamous clans of Utah?  Short Creek is on the Utah-Arizona border.  There are groups in Canada and Mexico.  Missouri is mentioned in the article, as well as other parts of the US, at least in passing.  Thus, the title of this article should be changed. Nereocystis 04:55, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename article to ''Polygamist branches of Mormonism''

message: Shouldn't this article really be merged with Mormon fundamentalism, at least until such time as there's enough material as to suggest a pressing need for separate articles?  The naming conventions seem to indicate that -ism titles are more standard than -ist ones, and it seems that the polywhatsit groups are the large part of the fundamentalist groups, so it's going to be very difficult to write the 'parent' article separately from this one.  On another matter, can someone clarify the role of polyandry within either the movement historically, or within the modern groups?  Alai 02:13, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?  And poly-?
Talk:Chicago History Museum

message: I added the part about the postcard collection from the Chicago Postcard Museum to show that future additions are in place for the Museum. Bubbles05 (talk) 17:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A 2003 National Geographic article, "The Emancipation Proclamation: An Act of Justice", states that Lincoln's own final copy of the Emancipation Proclamation was inside the Chicago Soldiers' Home when the Soldiers' Home was destroyed in the 1871 fire. But the Soldiers' Home building did not burn (and still exists in the same spot), and the document was not even there at the time: the Chicago Collections Consortium states that the document had been "placed" at the Chicago Historical Society and was on exhibition there when the CHS building burned to the ground in the fire. (Also Cornell Library: "There were once two copies of the Emancipation Proclamation in Lincoln’s handwriting: a preliminary and a final copy. The final copy was acquired by the Chicago Historical Society, where it burned in the 1871 Chicago Fire.") I'd first given the Nat Geo article as a source, then replaced it with the Chicago Collections page that lists the Chicago History Museum's Lincoln papers and describes the route the document took. Fishlandia (talk) 23:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced sources for the Emancipation Proclamation draft
Talk:They (1993 film)

message: Most sources list it as they watch including the box cover. I couldnt figure out why imbd labeled it "they", but then I saw that the original Kipling story was called. They. Perhaps someone could write up ana rticle on the short story? Nevertheless other than imbd almost all sources call this movie they watch. Just my two cents. --Gary123 Apply now, exciting opportunities available at Continental Op Detective Agency! 20:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:N'kisi

message: It should probably be noted that the telepathy references that keep popping up in this article are not acts of vandalism but indeed show up in the source articles.  I put this here in case the next person looking for obvious vandalism thinks to look here before editing the article to remove what appears to be obvious vandalism.  
<BR/>-- Strangelv 20:14, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Another, opposite issue here is that several recent edits have removed all mention of skepticism on the part of the scientific community. While I found this story very interesting, and I hope to see further studies on why N'kisi was so successful at "mind reading", the fact is that scientists see these kinds of stories all the time, and they almost often turn out to be a situation where variables were not properly controlled or where deliberate fraud was involved. I'll be the first here to say that some of the mainstream researchers who piled on this one were simply vituperative and mean-spirited, but there are many other cooler heads in the scientific community who understand the difference between skepticism and blind rejection. Their voices must also be heard. Denni talk 19:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: N'kisi seems to be conjugating verbs, which would refute Chomsky's claim that these parrots are simply conditioned.  Ironically this also suggests an argument in support of Chomskyan theories regarding language acquisition capabilities developed by evolution.  Do you know of more information about N'kisi's linguistic ability?  75.75.151.180 22:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parrot linguistics 

message: Unless there's something else notable called N'Kisi, there's no need for the qualifier "(parrot)".  I'm moving this article back to N'Kisi. --The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 06:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: At , which used to link link to a story about N'kisi and is used as a source here, there is now a different story with a note at the bottom reading: "Note: This story about animal communication has replaced an earlier one on this page which contained factual inaccuracies we were unable to correct. As a result, the original story is no longer in our archive. It is still visible elsewhere, via the link below..."  Not sure exactly how it should be handled, just wanted to point that out. Recury 14:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh dear. I reckon it was the "telepathy" rubbish.  --LiamE 14:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, half a sentence doesn't strike me as particularly uncorrectable. Recury 18:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC story retracted 

message: The source provided for "scientists are now beginning to recognize the intelligence of parrots" doesn't seem to exist anymore. --Bozwaldo (talk) 02:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: That Last Sentence
Talk:Harpeth Hall School

message: As you can see in the edit history, I have heavily edited this article, having brought it up a few notches toward acceptable Wikipedia standards. I have removed several incidences of unambiguous puffery and "advertisement" language. I have added secondary references, newspaper quotes, and book references where there were none; therefore, I have taken the liberty of removing the maintenance templates.  Eagledj (talk) 22:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good school — deserves good article 

message: When looking for sources, I confused this school with Harpeth Academy. My change was reverted, and I have updated the page with a better source.
I feel that the school’s historic racial demographics is part of its history and deserves to be in the article. If anyone feels that I made a mistake in my sourcing, please discuss it on this talk page. Billhpike (talk) 00:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Harpeth Academy 

message: I agree that discussion of Harpeth Hall's history during the era of segregation would benefit the article. I have added a section entitled "Diversity", to address the issue from a neutral point of view.--Eagledj (talk) 21:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diversity section added
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennessee

message: I have nominated Cracker Barrel for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR 

message: There is a split proposal ongoing at Tornado outbreak of March 2–3, 2020, to split the 2020 Nashville tornado into a stand-alone article. You can participate in the split discussion here. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 02:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal at [[Tornado outbreak of March 2–3, 2020]] 

message: Southern Adventist University has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Southern Adventist University]] 

message: Could someone from this WikiProject take a look at :Entrepreneurs of Knoxville and assess it per :WP:NORG? It's been around for more than ten years, but it never seems to have had the :WP:ORGDEPTH type of coverage that clearly establishes its Wikipedia notability. It also looks like members of the organization might have created the page and have been doing most of the editing. I removed a :WP:NOTDIRECTORY-type section, but there's probably much more that needs to be done if notability can be established. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entrepreneurs of Knoxville 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Andrew Farmer#Requested move 5 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Andrew Farmer#Requested move 5 January 2024]]
Talk:Paul Colman Trio

message: This is the talk page where you can leave comments or note mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yobot (talk • contribs) 03:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Should the solo discography be moved to his solo page? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:04, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say no,  Paul Colman's music is different enough than this band.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.26.24.241 (talk) 16:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 
Talk:Arabber

message: Could someone who is adept at IPA notation supply the correct pronounciation? As any Baltimorean knows, it's AY-rab. Lindmere 20:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IPA Pronounciation?

message: Surely it is more than a coincidence that the word 'araba' is Turkish for a car or, originally, a cart. "An araba (from Arabic: عربة, araba or Turkish: araba [1]) (also arba or aroba) is a carriage (such as a cabriolet or coach), wagon or cart drawn by horses or oxen, used in Turkey and neighboring Middle Eastern countries. It is usually heavy and without springs, and often covered." Araba Wikipedia entry Peynirli (talk) 19:44, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 