lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:20th Armoured Brigade Combat Team (United Kingdom)

message: based on the inacurrate wikipedia definition, that is, 20th Armoured Brigade (United Kingdom), fine. Shows the inveteracies. Phd8511 (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  If you want to revert the name 

message: Structure 2007:
* HQ and 200 Signal Squadron, Royal Corps of Signals
* 1st The Queen's Dragoon Guards
* Queen's Royal Hussars
* 1st Battalion, Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment
* 1st Battalion, Yorkshire Regiment
* 5th Battalion, The Rifles
Paderborn Garrison:
* 26th Regiment, Royal Artillery
* 28 Regiment, Royal Engineers
* 35 Regiment, Royal Engineers
* 1 Logistical Support Regiment, Royal Logistic Corps
* 3rd Battalion, Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
* 110 Provost Company, Royal Military Police
* 102 Military Working Dog Support Unit
* 141 Military Intelligence Squadron, Intelligence Corps 
Sammartinlai (talk) 10:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 Structure 

message: Why is this page now called "Armoured Infantry Brigade"?  The titles are now "Armoured Brigade BCT".  See more here.  12th Armoured BCT also changed from Armoured Inf to Armoured BCT.  @Buckshot06 @Dormskirk. J-Man11 (talk) 14:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming, again
Talk:Oak Grove High School (Hattiesburg, Mississippi)

message: Delete this now!!  It is an abomination of the aims of Wikipedia!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomkeene (talk • contribs) 
: Ummmm... ZappaOMati 00:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Oak Grove High School (Hattiesburg, Mississippi). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120724003551/http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/story/2012-07-20/Brett-Favre-will-be-assistant-high-school-coach/56376458/1 to http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/story/2012-07-20/Brett-Favre-will-be-assistant-high-school-coach/56376458/1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 but not needed since the original link is OK Meters (talk) 20:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Oak Grove High School (Hattiesburg, Mississippi). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326055622/http://www.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/list-1982.pdf to http://www.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/list-1982.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 but not needed since the original link is OK Meters (talk) 20:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:IRC script

message: I have removed text "mIRC is a very good client for anyone who wants to do basic IRC scripting. If you have any interest in mIRC you can download it from mIRC.com" - this is obvious POV. Polimerek 10:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I cleaned up the article this evening, doesn't look too much of a stub now - requesting removal of stub template. Cheers. Madmikeuk needs more cowbell. 20:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleaned Up 

message: I propose that this site be removed, as I have browsed through it and, of the three 'scripts' I tried, TWO were trojan horses (verified by VirusTotal service as 32/39 and 24/39) and the other just didn't work.
I think this site is past its prime and expired, and should no longer be trusted as a source of IRC scripts by Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CheeseGamer (talk • contribs) 08:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest mentioning this on Talk:mIRC as that talk page should get more traffic than this one. Tothwolf (talk) 15:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  mIRCscripts.com
Talk:Common yabby

message: Anyone able to elaborate on which language group uses 'Moheetu Lakakatu' as a name for the yabby. Kinda misleading given the huge number of aboriginal languages etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.138.232.157 (talk) 11:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Indigenous Language

message: I don't think destructor is in NZ.  Does anyone have any evidence? GrahamBould 10:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True indeed. --Stemonitis 13:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Zealand

message: Concerned to see yabbies (Cherax destructor) listed as endangered.  This is not correct and should be changed.  I cannot fathom why the IUCN would list them as Vulnerable.  They still have a very wide range and are very common.  The creation of countless farm dams throughout south-eastern Australia has in fact created much new habitat for them.
Codman 05:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to vulnerable.  I suspect the IUCN does not count aquacultured animals in their counts, just as captive endangered species don't stop a species from being extinct in the wild. — ceejayoz talk 04:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Even allowing for not counting aquacultured animals, surely the vast numbers in farm dams & lakes should be counted as they are effectively wild. Bizarre. GrahamBould 08:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The populations in the countless farm dams across SE Australia that I refer to are not aquacultured populations but wild, self-maintaineing populations using additional habitat created by European settlement.  Even excluding these populations and these habitats, yabby populations are strong and secure in many natural habitats, and not under threat.  A pleasant change to dire situation most Australian fauna are in!  cheers, Codman 00:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Anything we can do to remove the Vulnerable tag then? GrahamBould 08:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yabbies not endangered
Talk:The Always Open Mouth

message: Just a question...are the band fans of Doctor Who? This episode might explain this song title. Jubella 11:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taking Cassandra to the End of the World Party

message: I find it funny that Tourette's Guy is mentioned in the article as being "infamous," yet the Wikipedia administrators feel that the website isn't important enough to get its own article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kerryking113 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand why he's mentioned here. I'm tempted to remove it, but I don't really know anything about this band/album. Would someone explain this? --30daysinAKK (talk) 19:59, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourette's Guy
Talk:Keisha Buchanan

message: The "1998–2009: Sugababes era" section needs reorganising in some way. It is very long and it contains sub-sections (presumably added later by other editors) which cover different periods from the dates in the subject heading.
The options would seem to be either moving these subsections to one or more new main sections or leaving them where they are and  changing the name of that section.
95.150.59.182 (talk) 20:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for "Organize section" Template
Talk:Benjamin H. Freedman

message: Far under WP's usual standards, this article's aim is to demonize rather than inform - In fact it is a textbook attempt at character assassination, without any subtility about it; The focus is put on extreme views from one-sided, questionable sources, with no other side of the argumentation medal being showed at all. Furthermore, there's no valid recollection of the subject's activities, apart for those who would cause all of the apparent zionistic hatred, reluctantly. Was he really part of the Versailles negociations after WWI? To answer this question, and all others not related to caricature, we must go elsewhere than the WP page, as it is obviously under the control of an interested party. Who's responsible for this mess? MVictorP (talk) 16:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible article 

message: In the first section (before Biography), his credentials should be shown.
They are:
He was once an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations.(1)
Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, 
Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more powerful people of that time.(1)
He was liaison to Henry Morgenthau Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected.(2)
He was 'confidential man' to Henry Morgenthau Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and  
was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer.(2)
He attended the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, and sat in meetings with President Woodrow Wilson.
(2)
(1) source:on the page itself, External links, The speech in its entirety, in the introduction.
(2) source:on the page itself, External links, The speech in its entirety, these were the man's own 
words.
Notes: 1 is a dead link, so should be removed.
The sentence "In 1946, he sued the American Jewish Committee for libel and the case was thrown out 
in less than a month.[13][14]" cannot be substantiated by the notes, therefore should be removed.
Notes: 13,14, should be removed. Articles do not exist.
Notes and citations: 5 is an opinion, not facts. Should be removed.
Resource: dead link: House Committee on un-American Activities, 1954 (PDF 3 Meg), does not exist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TellMeTheTruthSVP (talk TellMeTheTruthSVP (talk) 17:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject's credentials are missing 

message: Freedman founded the Christian Anti-Defamation League in 1950. --2003:DC:8F22:AD1C:4D30:EBEE:42B7:2DE0 (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian Anti-Defamation League
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal/Workshop

message: Saladin's evidence section is long on text and short on actual evidence. In fact, most of what he has written shows contempt (not only for proof-reading, but) for the process. Highly idiosyncratic style and grammar, strange spaces which scroll the page ten fold and so on — I just changed that now, but it was there from the 1st edit since the page was open, on June 4 — was anyone able to read it? Did anyone read it? Anyone?  Meanwhile, Jayjg & SlimVirgin have provided a disturbing and well-documented account. So why do we have User:PHDrillSergeant & others claiming this is an average new user? It appears questionable. P.S. I await the appeal of User:General Tojo with an especial trepidation! El_C 11:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was willing to take a look at it; but I suspect that consideration of repeatedly inserting links to a Wikipedia attack site will doom his appeal. Jayjg and SlimVirgin have been patient rather than hasty. I wish he had been more reasonable. I want to see the Islamist and Palestinian perspective represented here. The editing problems we could have lived with. The hostile bantering, no. Fred Bauder 12:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for responding, Fred. Not quite as User:General Tojo-specific as I'd hoped for, but I am nonetheless satisfied with that reply. El_C 12:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I'll check the log, but why on earth did you think that was an appropriate link? Fred Bauder 17:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On [[User:PHDrillSergeant]] & others unremitting defense
Talk:Albendazole

message: What is the dose of albendazole to be taken for a patient having Hook Worm ++?
−The FDA only allows this drug to be indicated for the treatment of Pork Tapeworm, and Dog Tapeworm. Doctors may use it to treat other infestations as literature (JAMA) is presented
Sammorxman 15:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it safe for us to be providing dosages on wikipedia? I really don't think it's a good idea.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RamziE (talk • contribs) 05:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dosage

message: In this website:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm
says that albendazole has been approved since 1996, contrary to what it states on this article.
--Felipebm (talk) 12:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FDA approval

message: see 
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/10/1215.pdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.7.84.149 (talk) 06:48, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add use against giardiasis  

message: How likely is this ?
The symptoms of this drug sound worse than the infection. Mebendazole seems to have fewer and less severe symptoms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.133.146.132 (talk) 15:23, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hair Loss ?

message: How long will it remain effective in storage with good conditions? 2603:6081:8F01:3171:354B:BD6B:23CF:FB32 (talk) 11:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, Talk pages are not for random discussion about article topics. They are there to discuss improvements to the article. See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. — kashmīrī TALK 14:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shelf life
Talk:Idsall School

message: From examining the edit history, it is clear that some individuals (most likely the same one or two people editing anonymously from both dynamically-changing home IP addresses and their school's IP) are intent on adding information to the main article on how they rile the school's science technician by chanting "During the Cold War" when he enters a classroom.
To the person or people who keep clumsily adding this information to the article, please read the official guidelines "What Wikipedia is not", "No original research", "Notability", and above all "Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day". The antics of half a dozen schoolchildren calling themselves the "Pan Man Clan" is of no interest to the rest of the world, and probably very little interest to a lot of other people within the school itself. This sort of thing, which appears to be little more than an in-joke shared by a few students at a small school, and which will probably be forgotten as soon as the parties involved leave that school, is not the kind of information belongs on Wikipedia. Unless you can provide verifiable information that this is a long-standing meme at the school (along the lines of Eton's range of slang and traditions, for example), please do not continue to re-add this information to the article. Between-friends jokes, no matter how much detail you describe them in, are best kept for your LiveJournals and MySpaces, not a public encyclopedia. --217.65.149.50 11:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "During the Cold War"
Talk:Amplicon

message: Hello! As part of an online Molecular Biology class through Johns Hopkins University we ((Dechava1), (Dusty40) and (Jedwar48)) will be updating this article. Please feel free to leave us comments here as we attempt to improve this article by adding content, links and references. Though we are first-time wikipedians we hope that by the end of our project this article will adequately communicate what an amplicon is and how it arises, among other things. Our assignment will conclude on December 15, 2012.
Thanks!
Dechava1 (talk) 22:53, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Upcoming updates to this article

message: Hi, guys. Here's a final-week mini-review of your page. It is just a few random notes, that I jotted down while skimming the page, and is not intended as a comprehensive review.
* In the introduction, "amplification" links to a disambiguation page.  You probably want to change it to link to the target for Amplification_(molecular_biology), which is Gene_duplication#Gene_duplication_as_amplification.  Tag it like this:  amplification, which results in this:  amplification.
* I don't think the figure of the PCR machine adds any value to this article.
* The section "Amplicon structure" is a bit weak.  For example, I'm not even sure what this sentence means, "During artificial amplification, amplicon length is dictated by the experimental goals".  You should be able to elaborate quite a bit on this section, I would think.
* In general, Db4an's review comments here are good, but it looks like many of his suggestions haven't been taken.
* In particular, I liked his idea to use Viral vector as a model for how your article should look, and I still think you could do a lot to beef up your article, and try to copy some of the ideas and structure from that one.
* You could add some more figures.  Please see some suggestions here, under "Figures and Images".
Klortho (talk) 00:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final week mini-review
Talk:Pat Korte

message: is this entry really necessary? i can think of a lot of people who have accomplished a lot more who are not on wikipedia. (User:138.238.223.25 23:44, 14 July 2006 UTC)
This entry is not necessary at all.( User:24.199.82.121 05:31, 18 November 2006  UTC)
self-promotion only makes media celebrities.........this movement does not need a spokesperson ( User:149.31.51.78 18:49, 19 November 2006 UTC)
:I've removed the proposed deletion ("prod") tag as I believe there is a good-faith basis for asserting the notability of this subject and the deletion reason offered was insufficent. Feel free to continue discussion on this talkpage or to bring to AfD if desired. Newyorkbrad 17:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't remember too much about this.  I created it for another editor.  I don't mind what happens to this article, you can try listing it for discussion at Articles for Deletion.--Konstable 19:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

text: This article insults nobody. If there are other notable activists that we should have articles about then the thing to do is to write those articles - not to delete this one. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's wonderful: find third party sources and write articles about them. That has no bearing on existing, referenced articles just because you don't like the subject.  Note also that the article you mention above is NOT marked for deletion but for improvement, largely because " Very few or no other articles link to it, It may have been edited by a person who has a conflict of interest with the subject matter, It is an autobiography, or has been extensively edited by the subject, and may not conform to NPOV policy." I can only assume Ravi Arvind Palat is you.  Please read Wikipedia policies on this, and keep the discussion of Ravi Arvind Palat on that talk page. This talk page is for discussion of this article not for discussion of the relative merits of its subject.  Also please sign you comments with four tildes. T L Miles (talk) 16:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

text: (after edit conflict) Notability is not the same as accomplishment. For a definition of what is meant by Wikipedia notability for people see WP:BIO. Pat Korte meets this guideline by virtue of the fact that he has been written by publications such as The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune, The New Statesman, CBS News and The New Yorker. In the case of Ravi Arvind Palat his notability will no longer be questioned if you can provide such reliable sources, and if any of the USASS people you mentioned above have received significant coverage from publications such as these you are welcome to write an article about them. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

text: The answer to that is to put in the effort into creating an article on Jessica Rapchik, not to try to delete the article on Pat Korte or to remove material from it. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:15, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: notability
Talk:Ten Bears

message: There are three competing forms of this name:
*The calque of his name in English:  Ten Bears
*The Anglicized version of his name used in English language texts:  Paruasemʉno
*The Comanche version of his name as spoken in Comanche:  Pawʉʉrasʉmʉnurʉ
The infobox is for the name as it appears in the native language, not for the name as it appears in Anglicized form in English.  Check out .  One of the problems is that modern Comanche is natively spoken by a vanishingly small number of people.  The question then arises of whether a native name from a 19th century figure is based on the actual Comanche name at the time or influenced by the anglicization of that name over the last century.  19th anglicization of Comanche was notoriously bad ('parua' for pawʉʉra 'bear (probably grizzly)', for example).  This particular word is further complicated by the fact that the grizzly went extinct and the only term for 'bear' in modern Comanche is the word they borrowed from Osage, wasapeʔ.  The most recent Comanche dictionary includes "parua", but it's undoubtedly not based on a continuous tradition of use from the 19th century language, but a reappropriation from a form found in poor 19th century sources.  If you look at Rejon's superior transcription, you don't find anything close to "parua", but you do find wʉʉra.  Canonge records neither "parua" nor wʉʉra because by the 1950s the only term for "bear" was wasapeʔ.  --Taivo (talk) 16:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It might also be mentioned that his name is anglicized as "Parra-Wa-Samen" by Dee Brown in Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee. 
AnthonyTF (talk) 20:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Dee Brown is hardly an authority on the Comanche language ;)  --Taivo (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comanche name
Talk:Hydrological transport model

message: I have made a redirect from "River flow model" to Hydrological transport model. I believe the first title is nicer than the second and the article may be moved to there with in inverse redirect. R.J.Oosterbaan (talk) 18:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I still favour merging with Runoff model. The problem as I see it is that many models are both runoff models and hydrological transport models, eg HBV.Babakathy (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion continued on Talk:Runoff model‎, OK? R.J.Oosterbaan (talk) 19:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Graustark

message: And what does the adjective 'graustarkian" mean? Ran across it in a book by John Lukacs. Sca 14:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'graustarkian' means, roughly, 'ruritanian' - suggesting a romantic adventure set in an imaginary kingdom in central or eastern Europe of the late 19th or early 20th century (or a fantasy world like it), often with the connotation of commoners coming to the aid of royalty. - PKM 17:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Adjective