lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leeds Central (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Is that really a candidate?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.37.39 (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  we beat the scum one nil!? 
Talk:Formula Woman

message: Should (2004) and (2021) share the same article? Are these two even related, except for the name? I will note that XFL (2001) and XFL (2020) do not share the same article, even though the championship league has the same name, and one is a revival of the other. -- 65.93.183.191 (talk) 04:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Formula?
Talk:Shatkarma

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.yogamag.net/archives/1991/cmay91/shat.shtml. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dana boomer (talk) 11:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: You forgott the virāmas it is written षट्कर्मन् Princ3jah (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  virāmas missing: षट्कर्मन्
Talk:John Roberts (footballer, born 1956)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 06:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: John Roberts (Australian rules footballer) →  – avoid confusion with John Roberts (footballer, born 1881) Joeykai (talk) 04:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 October 2021
Talk:Pro-war Left

message: As the author, I disagree with the idea that no such groupING exists. Whilst I'm sure that the people I mentioned haven't all got together at a particular time to thrash out their beliefs, they nevertheless share common beleifs and attitudes and identify themselves as doing so. This is, as far as I'm concerned, enough to identify them as a groupING, if not a group. A similar thing could be said of the anti-globalisation movement, which has a Wikipedia entry. 
As evidence of the above, this quote from Harry's Place: "The loose collection of individuals who get described in various ways – pro-war left, pro-liberation left, anti-fascist left and of course the mocking ‘decent left’, are no longer so marginalised in the debate." (http://hurryupharry.bloghouse.net/archives/2006/04/13/the_manifesto_a_personal_view.php)
The author clearly identifies a grouping called the pro-war left, etc., and identifies himself as a member. 
Likewise, the opponents of the pro-war left identify them as a grouping. See http://www.matthewturner.co.uk/Blog/2006/04/oh-dear-big-night-in-pub-i-cant.html for just one entry.
So, there's a grouping, self identified and identified by others that has organised at least one demonstration I'm aware of and has a manifesto (albeit not uncritically acepted by all of them, but most manifestoes are compromises.) What more evidence is needed of the group's existence?
Steve3742 14:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A reliable source is required to satisfy verifiability --Pak21 14:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From WP:SELFPUB: "Material from self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources in articles about themselves, so long as [...] the article is not based primarily on such sources." A reliable source would be one independent of the group itself, subject to some form of editorial oversight. An article in a national newspaper would be ideal. --Pak21 14:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

text: That article is not really about the grouping you are claiming exists here; it's about the Euston Manifesto. It doesn't even mention the name "Pro-war Left". --Pak21 15:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The bombastic claim that the Pro-War Left thinks the Anti-War Left hopes for the destruction of Israel should be verified immediately. Presumably such a wild accusation can be substantiated. Otherwise, I'm deleting it.Pmaclean (talk) 21:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Destruction of Israel
Talk:Skip bombing

message: I dispute that this bombing tecnique was invented by US pilots in the pacific. Colin Smith's book on the fall of Singapore mentions that an Australian pilot in the RAF used it against Japanese transports in the opening stages of the Malaya Campaign. Don't have the book to hand so I can't give his name. The author does describe the tactic in some detail and does mention that the pilot in question learned the technique on prior service against the Germans in Europe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.110.235.129 (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

message: While reading the article, it reminded me of the "dambusters":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Chastise
I think a mention and link would be appropriate.
This technique (as opposed to low altitude bombing), is clearly described as being used in operations long before Operation Chastise.  Such usage is recorded in available publications.
eg. Malayan Campaign (RAF/RAAF) - Dec 1941
Maj Giuseppe Cenni (Italian AF), against allied shipping in North Africa - May 1941
Gen George Kenney and Capt. Kenneth McCullar (USAAF), against Japanese Navy - October 1942.
Barnes Wallis' idea was nothing new.  The difference was that earlier pilots had been doing this "by the seat of their pants" with conventional bombs at about 100ft.  Wallis developed a complete "system" - a specialised bomb released at about 50ft with carefully computed  geometry. 77.100.153.86 (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity to "dambusters"?
Talk:St Olave's Church, Silver Street

message: As a humorous aside, the name "Mukewellestrate" (12th century) and "Muggle Street" (16th century) are both probably corruptions of "Monkswell Street". The Barber-Sugeons hall nearby is described as being on "Monkswell Street" on this page: Monkswell Steet, and the existing Barber-Surgeon Hall is on current maps as being in "Monkswell Square". Now we know where Muggles live. Here, not Hogwarts. Ogg 14:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: LOL
Talk:Joseph Sarnoski

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

message: Joseph Raymond Sarnoski is my great uncle my fathers name is Raymond Bazan, Unfortunately I have never met any of my fathers side of the family in which they are all from Pennsylvania. I am hoping to do so someday.  If any one has a reply please do so.
Tara (Bazan) Mascarenas  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.92.36.180 (talk) 00:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Joseph Sarnoski Great uncle
Talk:Santa Mesa

message: I noticed that Howard the Duck replaced the Map of Manila with a map of congressional districts.  Is this a better map?  It shows clearly the location of Sta Mesa but in the red highlighted bit the map includes areas outside of Sta Mesa.  I have added the Map of Manila in as another option.  Maybe there is a way to better integrate it into the article. --Bruce Hall (talk) 05:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Which map to use?

message: It would be helpful, I think, to add in years.  For instance, when was it a obra pia?  When did it merge with Manila?  Do we have other firm statistics like population? --Bruce Hall (talk) 05:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates would be helpful
Talk:Royal Australian Infantry Corps

message: The following statement from the lede: "The "Head of Corps – Infantry" is usually a Brigadier and is the Honorary Colonel of the Royal Australian Regiment." appears to contradict the several mentions in other places of successive Governors General being the Honorary Colonel.Lexysexy (talk) 02:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Honorary Colonel
Talk:Santa Ana, Manila

message: Why is the "Prehistory" section under the "History" section? lol
Also, how can "900-1,000" years ago be "prehistory"??? LOLOLOL  24.117.62.13 (talk) 00:32, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Story??? 

message: It seems like this issue hasn't really been touched upon. But I noticed from skimming the page that the barangay "count" of Santa Ana has a massive discrepancy. One of the statement introduction says that Santa Ana has, and I quote "thirty-two" barangays and proceeds to list the correct number of barangays: Brgy 897 to Brgy 905. However in the infobox, it's written that there are "99" barangays in Santa Ana with a footnote to a 2007 census which can no longer be accessed. Furthermore, in this section of the article about Manila City (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manila#Barangays_and_districts), it states suddenly that Santa Ana has "34" barangays which, frankly enough, comprise three very different numbers. Anyone care to check which among the following is true? Thanks. AviNakamoto95 (talk) 11:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple discrepancies regarding barangay count
Talk:San Andres, Manila

message: I checked the reference on the 2010 census data for san andres and there is no san andres in the list. I was wondering, where was the value derived? 
http://www.census.gov.ph/sites/default/files/attachments/hsd/pressrelease/National%20Capital%20Region.pdf
--natadecoco (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population data 2010 

message: Hello. I would like to ask, first and foremost, where the 65 barangays value in the info box was derived from. As of the 2020 census, there was no mention nor count of the barangays in San Andres Bukid; nor is there a consolidated list of which of the barangays are included. May I suggest adding the list of which barangays comprise San Andres to be added so that it's clearly stated which ones are included? Thank you. AviNakamoto95 (talk) 18:13, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed inclusion for a list of barangays
Talk:Sa'd al-Din Köpek

message: Yes, I am aware that “köpek” means “dog” in Turkish. I also know that “dog” is a term of abuse, particularly in Islamic cultures. From what we know of Sa’d al-Din’s character, he might well have deserved such an epithet. Yet he acknowledged the name, even going so far as to put it on Zazadin Caravanserai: ( or k.w.b.k). For what it’s worth, in his notes on Simon de Quentin’s Histoire des Tartares, Jean Richard offers the alternate transliteration “Göbäk” (p. 72). Let us not be so quick to add “köpek means dog in Turkish” to the article. Aramgar 15:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dog

message: From the last line: "Due to his desire to became sultan after stepping out the Kaykhusraw II." Perhaps "Breaking with" would be better then "stepping out". pergelator  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.43.39.82 (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: poor expression?
Talk:Are You My Mother?

message: Piffel! It's a SNORT! And it RESCUES him! 124.169.0.51 15:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I LOVE THIS BOOK!
how do you find te words for it???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.97.115 (talk) 03:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: Is this book still listed by the National Education Association as one of its "Teachers' Top 100 Books for Children"?
If so, the section on the major accolades of the book should be updated to include more recent accomplishments, rather than awards given 10+ years ago. 
Jilliangtown (talk) 17:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Question to consider for addition
Talk:Jimmy Doherty

message: Does he come from Suffolk or Sussex? There was a programme on BBC 4 about the people who collect honey in Nepal tonight (April 26 2009), on which Doherty said that came from either Suffolk or Sussex. I don't remember which. If any one does and could add this information to the "Biography" section, it would make this article more comprehensive, as would mention of Doherty's scientific background. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following short paragraph was removed by User:Ali jimmysfarm on 20 February 2015:
:Doherty has been accused of serving as an unpaid spokesman for the National Farmer's Union and the interests of agribusiness, particularly Monsanto.
(nowiki tags added for the talk page only)
I initially restored it due to the user's suspected conflict of interest, but have since removed it again as, despite the potential COI, it does seem that the paragraph may give undue weight to a single person's opinion. I invite other editors to comment, and restore the paragraph if it would be appropriate to do so. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 11:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed paragraph

message: Uhhh, what was that self-downloading PDF from a sketchy-looking Danish domain website that is linked to in the "Bibliography" section??  I skimmed the edit history and didn't find it, so I'm removing the section for now just to be safe.  Someone can put it back if they know it's legit (ie, not malware or a pirated ebook). 67.183.192.152 (talk) 01:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy virus blocker, Batman!
Talk:1899 Brooklyn Superbas season

message: Is there a cite somewhere that says that the large number of players moving between the Superbas and the Orioles was an actual trade? Baseball-reference lists each one as a separate "assignment" of the individual player. Since the two teams were owned by the same ownership group, it would seem to me that this is more like the situation described on the 1899 Cleveland Spiders season page.
In any case, I have moved the "trade" to the introduction (as it is on the Spiders page) and left it without a citation for the time being. Any further information would be appreciated. -Dewelar (talk) 20:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: March 11 trade with Baltimore
Talk:Maravankudieruppu

message: we have cited references to the article in the page of maravankudieruppu. Please accept the changes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annejes (talk • contribs) 12:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  We have improved our article 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Subtended angle

message: Okay, I think it means...
An angle opposite a curve, used to create a triangle of sorts, with the curve in the place where a straight edge would be in an actual triangle...
It's a question. Is this what that means? ~ R.T.G 11:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The angle opposite the curved edge, in a triangle with two straight edges and one curved edge...? (EDIT:also asked to reference desk just now) ~ R.T.G 11:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jargon 

message: An angle is subtended at a point, not subtended from, so the image is wrongly worded. Musiconeologist (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text in image
Talk:HMS Andromeda (1897)

message: Have added a little note on this. Hope is OK. The little note  in Balbi, C. M. R. "Electrical engineering in the Royal Navy." Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers 7.76 (1961): 225-226.  seemed most reliable... but there seem to be various spellings of Craufurd's name (Torpedo Lieutenant RN in https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/jiee-3.1961.0116 ) in other sources..Thought I would raise here as is good article and some might want better formatted refs and I don't want to spoil thing. Best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 13:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First wireless broadcast from Andromeda to Argonaut 1907  =
Talk:HMS Argonaut (1898)

message: The Graecia was renamed Pollockshields and wrecked off Elbow Beach in Bermuda on the 7th of September, 1915.Bernews: Historical Photos: Boat Passengers Escape in 1915Ship Wreck Expo: PollockshieldsBermuda For Visitors: The Pollockshields
BermudaRegimental (talk) 17:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Graecia wrecked in 1915
Talk:HMS Niobe (1897)

message: Previously this page listed the HMCS Niobe as the first ship of the Royal Canadian Navy, being commissioned on September 6, 1910.  This date is correct, as verified here http://www.cmp-cpm.forces.gc.ca/dhh-dhp/his/docs/Naval_Svc_vol1_e.pdf on page 138.  However, according to that same document, the HMCS Rainbow was actually commissioned one month and two days before that, on August 4, 1910.  That can be verified on page 142.  This document is the official history of the naval service of Canada, as published under the authority of the Minister of National Defence at the time.  
- McFarlane  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.0.138.227 (talk) 16:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit: Second RCN Ship, Not First 

message: HMCS Niobe was also used as a shore establishment during the Second World War and a shore establishment/secondary name of the UK-based Canadian naval attache until 1965.
https://www.canada.ca/en/navy/services/history/ships-histories/niobe.html CMacMillan (talk) 16:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Successive HMCS Niobe names
Talk:2007 Free Airlines L-410 crash

message: Is this accident really that notable?  I strongly suggest redirecting or deleting it. – Zntrip 23:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's part of a pattern.  In no small part because of years of conflict, the DRC has an aviation safety record that the ICAO calls 'an embarrassment', hence the blacklist.  Craft are routinely overloaded with extra passengers and unsecured cargo. Maintenance is neglected. They are flown with expired or falsified certifications and licenses (as appears to have happened here). Then when they crash the causes are barely investigated and nothing changes.  Few besides the UN bother to report on it at all.  To the extent that the world forgets it happens, we are complicit.  At the risk of making a point, I think we should take any excuse for notability we can find. In this instance, the death of an MP will do. LeadSongDog 02:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Surely, any commercial plane crash that makes headline news as this one did is notable? - Neparis 03:31, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

text: It resulted in a liscence revocation for an airline. That's pretty notable. Also, a commercial airline crash with fatalities is generally considered notable, per the guidlines at WP:AIRCRASH. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)  (Contribs) 15:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Thomas J. Autzen

message: The Autzen Foundation was not "created by Thomas J. Autzen to fundraise for the construction of Autzen Stadium." The Foundation was created by Thomas J. Autzen in 1951, well before the site of any new stadium had even been purchased by Oregon AD Leo Harris, who was the chief fundraiser for the stadium effort. The foundation was primarily involved with charitable donations including scholarships and educational grants.
Then-UO president Arthur Flemming approached Thomas E. Autzen in 1966, asking for a donation from the foundation of $250k that would put the $1m fundraising drive over the top. In exchange for the donation, the stadium was dedicated to Thomas J. Autzen, but it was Thomas E. -- who was an Oregon graduate -- who decided to donate the funds of the foundation he controlled.
The sole original citation, a 2006 foundation directory, mentions not a word about athletic or collegiate donations as a target of Autzen Foundation donations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdoozy (talk • contribs) 21:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completely wrong history of the Foundation
Talk:Patton Brothers

message: this article states two different fathers who is it?
yeah I noticed that, anyone know?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.3.192 (talk) 21:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two different fathers

message: I was wondering what was the copyright status of this YouTube clip. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Vera Lynn Show'' (1961)
Talk:The Life and Deeds of the Immortal Leader Karađorđe

message: The text says:
:The screening was denounced by some Croatian nationalists, who objected to a Serbian film being shown in the Croatian capital.
The source, however, says:
: Zanimljivo je da projekcija filma takvog naziva nije izazvala reakcije hrvatskih desničara, osim ljutih komentara anonimnih čitalaca na portalima.
The source actually states the opposite ("the screening [...] did not cause any reactions by Croatian right-wingers"), and describes the opposition as an exception, ascribing it to "angry comments by anonymous [Internet] portal visitors". Since it is easy to find anonymous Internet opposition to pretty much anything, the relevance of this fact is dubious, particularly in the context of the first part of the sentence, as worded by the source. GregorB (talk) 12:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reactions in Zagreb
Talk:Black Horse Pike

message: I will freely admit that I have always been baffled by the "Black Horse Pike" and have never been able to understand why it isn't a single road, or which are included. I made this up based on my best guesses of what was included from other articles and from Google Maps, and welcome anyone with more accurate information and sources to expand (and correct) what I have started. Alansohn 17:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Horse Pike
Talk:Vanderbilt Commodores

message: - MTSU is not our rival and never has been. Just because a Sun Belt team wants to schedule us doesn't make it a rivalry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vandyfan12 (talk • contribs) 07:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

message: :So fix it. :) Esrever (klaT) 23:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Triteleia laxa

message: It's not helpful to compare T laxa to a potato. There's no resemblance, except of course it's a root. You don't have to cook T laxa in order to eat it; in fact it's better raw. Tastes like asparagus or artichoke not potato. It was once called "Indian potato" which may explain the confusion.
And sorting with the asparagus family is still in dispute AFAIK. 
:Kortoso  (talk) 21:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potato