lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gateway Transit Center (TriMet)

message: Am I the only one who sees the text on the map all over the place?  It's fine in the nominal sized version, but as it is in the article, all the text is way off where it should be.Noliver (talk) 06:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map rendering strangely 

message: Add request even though there are a couple pictures, but really need one of the station/tracks. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic request

message: What are your thoughts on renaming this article to Gateway Transit Center (TriMet) ahead of Gateway North station's opening? I'm from the west side so not sure, but I feel the general station area is more commonly referred to by that name. It will prevent us from having to create a new article for Gateway North, as well as from having to use a longer name like "Gateway/Northeast 99th Avenue Transit Center and Gateway North station". Alternative ideas appreciated. --truflip99 (talk) 15:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I like that idea, given the opening of the new, separate Gateway North station (set for next week).  Also, this is a transit center, not just a MAX station, and that shorter version has always been used for bus service in most media (i.e. forms of communication; e.g. on destination signs of buses, signs at bus stops, schedules). – SJ Morg (talk) 19:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I agree with SJ Morg with this. It's the commonly used name (by locals, foreigners, and bus routes alike) and would be a good way to consolidate pages and really emphasize the transit center part of it. HiThereStranger (talk) 05:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: + Gateway North is just an extra station within the area of Gateway Transit Center so logically it makes sense too HiThereStranger (talk) 05:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

text: I'm also in agreement. The entire complex should be covered under a single article, and the proposed name makes the most sense under WP:COMMONNAME. I do think the Trains WikiProject as a whole should look at moving away from official names in situations where it just doesn't make as much sense, and this is one of those cases. SounderBruce 06:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Autoland

message: Added a section on the aircraft systems part of an autoland.  Brian (ZazenCID 14:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's an interesting 1968 film about the Trident's autoland facility on YouTube here:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.249.169 (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added "Autoland Systems" 

message: There was an article posted by Air & Space Smithsonian Magazine, in which they claim the first test of an autoland system was in 1935, and was done under military auspices.
See article here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpapo (talk • contribs) 15:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The First Autolanding 

message: Links for references 3 and 4 no longer work
138.250.5.115 (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: This article has very few references, particularly in the whole of the History and Systems sections, the first half of the Description section and the Preface, where there are none, yet many details are given for limits and other information.
The Systems section was marked as unreferenced in 2011, 12 years ago and the History section was marked as unreferenced in 2017, 6 years ago, yet no references have been added. Lkingscott (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more References
Talk:Raft

message: I have to build a raft, with all the minimum things provided. In the project, the situation we are facing is that we are strewn on an island after a ship wreck. Only some wires and a broken motor manage to come ashore from the rubble of the ship of the accident.
Will you please suggest an easy raft to make which wont take much time to prepare either.
Thanking you,
122.167.158.131 14:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I am doing a project in grade 8

message: This entry has but one reference and that is a 1976 dictionary.  It clearly needs considerably more work with additional references. Risssa (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Category talk:Bible

message: Hey everyone!
I was wandering if there is someone wanting to help me compile a "List of plants in the Bible", just like the List of the animals in the Bible.
Or we could make a new category called "Flora and Fauna of the Bible".
What do you think?
User:philosp 15:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Is there any category containing "Works abut Bible" or "Works about New Testament"? Ali Pirhayati (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to make a category for books/works about Quran and I wondered if there is such a category for bible. Thank you. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 19:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  question about works about bible
Talk:Variable envelope return path

message: VERP can also mean Visitor Experience Resource Protection a management system used in USA national parks.
The end of the article claims: >>Systems that implement greylisting will cause each post to the mailing list to be delayed unless they treat "similar" sender addresses as being equivalent.<< This not correct for the encoding schema shown in the article (wikipedians-owner-bob=example.org@example.net). This would be correct for cases when the mailing list software also includes an id of the message in the MAIL FROM -- then indeed, every sender address would be different. Maybe this scheme could be added to the article and the note about greylisting could be clarified. 62.40.79.66 08:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: VERP

message: Hi, I don't see the point of a separate Signed VERP article, mostly a stub with two external links to related products, therefore I proposed to merge it. --217.184.142.6 (talk) 01:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay with me, so long as the links in other articles pointing to Signed VERP can be pointed to the subheading within VERP.  All that matters is that it can be linked to directly.  Megacz (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

text: don't merge - I would say these two ideas should not be merged.  I would say that "signed VERP" is actually misleading as the two ideas are different.  Yes, they both create unique return path, but VERP is designed to handle problems with bounces from a mailing list that a domain runs, while BATV/SES/Signed VERP/etc. are designed to handle problems with bounces coming from email that the domain didn't generate.  Likewise, I don't think Sender Rewriting Scheme should be merged into this article even though it also generates unique return paths.  It is designed to handle problems with bounces from forwarding e-mail.  Really, If "signed VERP" gets merged, then I can't see why SRS wouldn't be. Wrs1864 (talk) 23:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Signed VERP]] 

message: Why was mlmmj removed from the list of software using VERP (with the comment "rm spam")? Mlmmj is a MIT/X11 licensed mailing list manager, so I don't think that entry is very spam-like.  --87.55.152.218 (talk) 01:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  mlmmj 

message: The following passage strikes me as snarky and un-encyclopedic
Another problem with VERP (and with any automatic bounce handling scheme) is that there will always be some recalcitrant MTAs on the Internet that fail to follow even the simplest standards. VERP depends on the recipients' MTAs following the rule that bounces are sent to the envelope sender. This has been a standard requirement since the dawn of SMTP in 1982 ...
63.153.201.118 (talk) 17:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would add that there is also no reference for this claim, to begin with. 87.190.53.66 (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone?
Talk:Heritage Park Historical Village

message: I just corrected the first paragraph to "largest historical village", which is what the source says. Fort Edmonton Park is actually the "largest historical park" in Canada, being some 92 acres larger than Heritage Park.--RAult (talk) 04:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Park? 

message: Historical accuracy in living history sites is not an absolute; it can be good or bad. Therefore, phrases like "true to the time", which suggests a high level of historical accuracy, should be avoided. Would making such claims count as original resarch? --Country Wife (talk) 13:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical accuracy 

message: It is true that no HBC fur post (or fur post from any other fur company, such as the North West Company or XY Company) was ever in the immediate Calgary area. However, I'm not sure why this point is stressed when other similar points are not. For example, the SS Moyie paddlewheeler is a popular exhibit, but not only did no paddlewheeler ever steam on Calgary rivers, but the lake itself didn't exist until 1932. And the original SS Moyie was in BC, not in Alberta.--Country Wife (talk) 13:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Hudson's Bay Company fort ever existed in Calgary 

message: Could we include data/detail(s) about the history of the park such as when (certain) buildings were built.Curb Chain (talk) 01:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: heritage park has a logo and should be used as the image for this posting. instead it is of a map of a portion of south west Calgary. 2604:3D09:98B:9000:40AE:B3B0:891B:F4F1 (talk) 09:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the park image is wrong
Talk:Beeran Gali

message: Town  Fozan Sardar (talk) 18:41, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to creat our town name 

message: Beerangali is a beauty of nature  . 182.177.38.193 (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beauty
Talk:Graph traversal

message: I guess Beam_search and Fringe_search can be added to the list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.109.133.171 (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Beam search

message: Thought I'd mention here that I'm currently attempting to exhume this article from its longtime "stub" status and into glorious notability.  Mainly, I want to mention that the lack of citations is understood, and will be addressed once the ideas here are well organized and unoriginal enough to merit associating them with textbooks and whatnot.  Feel free to lend a hand!  --Frizzil (talk) 09:04, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Building this article
Talk:Ironwood

message: hello...
i want to know latin name of ulin wood / iron woog. originally from indonesia
I may get lazy and give up on this project, but I think I am going to try to organize this into a table (perhaps a few) that will organize this database by classification, common name, and, most importantly, habitat.  Ideally, it would be a table with columns of those names which you could organize in the order of different attributes.  I would like to find out which kind of ironwood is in my backyard without reading each link, and I think that others would, too.  If I give up and you have time, please do this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.113.2.65 (talk) 07:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Indonesia

message: In the metric system 1 m3 of water equals 1000 kg (1 ton), so if the wood is heavier than that it sinks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.78.199.108 (talk) 12:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight. 

message: This article defines ironwood simply as any kind of wood that has a "reputation for hardness", which it then quantifies as any wood that is denser (heavier) than water.  There are multiple problems with this.
1. No source is cited for either of these claims.
2. Density or weight is not a measure of hardness.  There are multiple scales for measuring hardness, and there are other concepts of "hardness" by other names (for example, compressive strength, toughness, structural load), but these are all different from "density" or weight.  Is ironwood defined by weight or by hardness?
3. Some botanical sources cite "ironwood" as a specific species of tree (cf. https://www.mortonarb.org/trees-plants/tree-plant-descriptions/ironwood, which gives ironwood as the common name for Ostrya virginiana).
It's quite possible that there are multiple definitions of ironwood that prevail in different industries, disciplines, regions, or countries.  If so, this article could capture multiple such definitions, and cite sources.  But as it stands, it is a hodge-podge of vague and conflicting information with no sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScribeMonk (talk • contribs) 19:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced, Questionable, and Conflicting Definitions of Ironwood
Talk:RivaTuner

message: I have added a sreenshot I made of RivaTuner v 2.01 running on my computer but it is a ATI GPU I have, could someone with a NVIDIA GPU make a screenshot and replace the one I made. The software show more options with NVIDIA GPU. Plouiche 15:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot 

message: Half (or more) of the stuff in this article is crap. And theres that section about fan control that is a guide, see WP:NOT. Clean up this article now or delete it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Makelelecba (talk • contribs) 02:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs improvement 

message: What's the point of the EULA discussion? It doesn't make any sense -- what does Russia have to do with this software program? What is nvnews.net? Who is Guru3d? This sounds more like incomplete gossip than worthy encyclopedia material. Jazzman831 (talk) 02:41, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to be bold and just remove the section. It's not relevant, and if it were made relevant it would likely take up more space than the rest of the article. Jazzman831 (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  EULA Discussion? 

message: This article has been flagged for deletion (because it cites no sources) for more than two years now. Sheesh. I'm not all that familiar the rules for deletion are here on the Wikipedia, but I think it's safe to say that it's high time someone to insert some references already. Either that or we just hit the delete switch and be done with it. This place has rules for a reason, you know. Allthenamesarealreadytaken (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candidate for Deletion
Talk:Reynolds Museum

message: Would it no be an idea to link some of the may exhibits listed to at least some  of the companies who built them. ! - BulldozerD11 (talk) 17:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agricultural machinery exhibits 

message: Can somebody change the External Link, https://reynoldsmuseum.ca/land-transportation (with text displayed as "Land and aviation collection at the Reynolds-Alberta Museum") to https://reynoldsmuseum.ca/about-us/our-collection?
This new link shows a more comprehensive view of the collection and will likely be more informative for users. The display text should also be updated. 
Thanks
--Tyler at Reynolds Museum (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 21 January 2020 

message: Spintendo  01:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 5-FEB-2020
Talk:Der Rauchfangkehrer

message: I admit that there probably are some weak similarities between "Wenn dem Adler das Gefieder"and "Martern aller Arten", but calling the former an "embryonic" form of the latter seems a) far fetched, and b) unkind to Mozart. I suggest to delete that phrase if there's no citation for it. If there is indeed a citation to be found, I would be most interested in the author's reasoning. Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: You misunderstood what he meant, he does not suggest anything about Mozart using Salieri's work. "Marten aller Arten" is symply the name of one of the arias sung by the character of Fraule Nannette. Here is the address of a you tube video of the aria. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_H2rIuoNIIM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicoco95310 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you misundertood: Fräule Nannette's aria is called "Wenn dem Adler das Gefieder". I'm going to remove that part from the article. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Marten aller Arten
Talk:Abila (Peraea)

message: I have just edited the lat and long, to land close to the spot indicated in my Bible atlas, which was as-already- described in the text of this article. This needs further work, as all I did was to get the Google Earth cursor as close as I could to match the spot in the Bible atlas and read the coordinates from that. The previous co-ords pointed to 20Km east of the southern tip of Galilee. Stratopastor (talk) 13:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latitude and Longditude needs work  

message: Unsourced connection (palm trees as argument! The whole region is full of them, it's ridiculous, and this is just the clearest example) pushed several times in the text. There is a recent push among fundamentalist Evangelicals to promote Tell el-Hammam as Sodom, Shittim, Abila, Livias/Julias... Only Jerusalem and Nazareth are safe from them. Not impossible, but far from a consensus, only that these people are trading in certainties where there are none - so not useful to us. Please do keep an eye on it. Arminden (talk) 13:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV identification with Tell el-Hammam? 

message: I have removed the following titles:
* 
* 
Graves & Stripling apparently published basically the same material twice in 2007 in two different "journals", both of them strictly Creationist, so quoting one article more than suffices. The only question is if any of the two can be considered RS. The editor didn't link either, so they're of little use to both reader & fellow editor anyway.
Khouri is a journalist, he only collects info from archaeologists who author RS books; he's usually thorough, but not a quotable author on archaeology, he's only useful temporarily when nothing else is available, which is not the case here. Arminden (talk) 13:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overreferenced, not or hardly RS
Talk:Whyte Museum

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay KO (talk • contribs) 21:43, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You have not requested a specific change to this article. Edit requests are intended to work as thus: editors with a conflict of interest can propose specific edits/sentences, which are then reviewed by unbiased Wikipedia editors for neutrality, sufficient citations to reliable sources, copyright and close paraphrasing checks, and compliance with other policies. The onus is on the edit requestor to provide a workable draft. As of this message, the edit request queue has a backlog of over  entries, so requests that provide specific changes or additions will receive priority over general requests for updates. As you have not provided any specific sentences you wish to have added to the article, I am afraid there's not much I can currently do to help you. Altamel (talk) 21:18, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit requested on 25 August 2017
Talk:Abdol Hossein Sardari

message: It is not 'claimed' that he saved many Jews it is a fact that he did save many Jews from the Nazi's and has been officially recognized as well. - The proper edits have been made.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_helped_Jews_during_the_Holocaust —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.203.202.138 (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Admah

message: There is nothing in the tone of this article to suggest that Admah - like Sodom and Gomorrah - and its destruction (by God) were figments of someone's imagination (as I personally believe they were). Instead we simply read "It was destroyed...." as though this were some recorded historical fact. At least the "Sodom and Gomorrah" article indicates the cities were mentioned in the bible, allowing the reader to take their existence, let alone their destruction, with a pinch of salt. Compare also the article on "Noah's Ark", which again refers to the bible and God's wrath without any suggestion of historical reality.213.127.210.95 (talk) 13:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you know of a reliable source that suggests Admah was a figment of the imagination. If so, I think that would merit inclusion into the article. Alephb (talk) 00:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It was destroyed..."
Talk:Adonijah

message: The article says he was David's fourth son and that after the deaths of two older brother, he became the heir apparent. What about the third older brother? Thmazing (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The fourth son

message: In German article they say that Adonijah was inspired by Adonis Mythos.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.139.34.156 (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Adonis
Talk:Adria

message: ::In An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis by Mogens Herman,,2004
*Page 228,Dionysios I founded Adranon (no. 6) (Diod. 14.37.5 (r399)), probably Adria (no. 75), possibly Ankon (no. 76), certainly Issa (no. 81); cf. Stylianou (1998) ad 13.4-5 at p. 196), Lissos (no. ..."
*Page 320,"... 52o-51o, and is therefore somewhat later than that known at the Padanian sites of Spina (no. 85) and Adria (no. 75). The region functioned as a commercial intermediary between Greece and Etruria, and the Celtic regions in the north ..."
*Page 323,"... the face of the advancing Gauls. According to Strabo 8.6.16, Aiginetans founded a colony en ombrikois, probably archaeologically attested in Adria (no. 75). ..
*Page 324,"... = Tod 200). The location of the planned colony is unknown and a matter of conjecture-somewhere in the vicinity of Adria (no. 75) and Spina (no. 85), where Athens had strong C5 trade contacts, or on the coast of Apulia in ..."
*page 325,In C4f Adria was, apparently, refounded by Dionysios I (Theopomp. fr. 128; Tzetzes ad Lycophr. 631; Etym. Magn. 1854-57). According to Just. Epit. ..."
*page 333,"1 greci di Adria", RivStorAnt 4:1-21. ..."
*As a long-distance trading community, Aigina was not an active coloniser, but colonised Kydonia (no. 968) in 519, Adria (no. 75) c.C61, and Damastion in Illyria after 431 (Strabo 8.6.16). 
*In the listing at the last pages Adria is shown as founded by Aigina(Primary colony) and refounded by Syracuse(Secondary colony).
*Note that Dionysius I or Dionysius the Elder lived 432–367 BC.Megistias (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-Roman adria 
Talk:Adummim

message: This stub could very easily be slipped right into Ma'ale Adumim's Etymology and/or (expanded) History sections.  It's a no brainer!  JUST DO IT! --@Efrat (talk) 09:13, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: We do now have the major Christian sites, with some general context and links to more in-depth articles.
Is it still a "stub" re. the Hebrew Bible? One can go into the Christian tradition of Elijah taking shelter in Wadi Qelt. A bit indirect... Not religious, but related to Jewish history are the Hasmonean royal winter palaces at the Jericho end of the ascent. More ideas? Or can the stub sign be removed already? Arminden (talk) 08:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian aspects quite advanced. What about Hebrew Bible/Jewish topics?