Talk:Friedrich Gulda

message: I don't think Gulda is most famous for Beethoven. His fame for Mozart is either equal or greater.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbmillion (talk • contribs) 05:16, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mozart vs. Beethoven

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:22, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:K.488 3 Gulda-Harnoncourt.ogg Nominated for Deletion

message: The last part of the quoted text from Gulda is still obscure to me, what is that supposed to mean "Baroque Bandwagon?
″There can be no guarantee that I will become a great jazz musician, but at least I shall know that I am doing the right thing. I don't want to fall into the routine of the modern concert pianist's life, nor do I want to ride the cheap triumphs of the Baroque bandwagon″. Princilll (talk) 12:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baroque bandwagon 

message: "Gulda's later reliance on co-operating with companies whose recording techniques were primitive in comparison to those espoused by more sophisticated rivals stood him in very poor stead with regard to posterity. The rescued Mozart sonata tapes issued on DG are unbelievably bad in terms of recorded technical quality; likewise the Debussy Preludes and Bach recordings of the late 60s and early 70s."
DG had "primitive" recording techniques? This is not even original research, simply personal opinion, and has no place here. I deleted the passage. Opus131 (talk) 04:05, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced and opinionated 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Friedrich Gulda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100618052750/http://fischer.hosting.paran.com/music/Gulda/gulda-e.htm to http://fischer.hosting.paran.com/music/Gulda/gulda-e.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110523071758/http://fischer.hosting.paran.com/music/Gulda/discography-gulda.htm to http://fischer.hosting.paran.com/music/Gulda/discography-gulda.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080212120650/http://www2.deutschegrammophon.com/webseries/?ID=dvd&PRODUCT_NR=0734376 to http://www2.deutschegrammophon.com/webseries/?ID=dvd&PRODUCT_NR=0734376
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090708022608/http://www.classicaltv.com/search-tag/friedrich-gulda/348 to http://www.classicaltv.com/search-tag/friedrich-gulda/348
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified