Talk:Debra Ruh

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Debra Ruh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100113192532/http://www.usnews.com:80/usnews/biztech/articles/061106/6tecaccess.htm to http://www.usnews.com/usnews/biztech/articles/061106/6tecaccess.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Ruh and TecAccess received a lot of awards. I would like to zone in on the most notable awards - and particularly for Ruh herself. And, they either remove the non-notable ones, or perhaps put them in a note. Any input is appreciated.
I also posted a request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disability#Debra Ruh.--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: - the awards from regional organizations and some of the other awards were put into notes. I put the ones in the body of the article that seemed most noteworthy.--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most notable awards 

message: She has been on the:
* Olmstead Board
* Veterans' Employment Board
* U.S. Business Leadership Network Board (USBLN)
* Virginia Business Leadership Network Board 
* Virginia Council of CEOs
* Advisory panel member of the Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center
* Advisory member of G3ict, a U.N. organization that supports information and communication technologies accessibility
Are there other sources for these? I have only seen G3ict mentioned elsewhere.--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, people with a close connection or COI cannot make direct updates to the article, but can s. So, if you have secondary sources, like newspapers, magazines, or books - or other reliable, secondary sources, you may provide that information here. Then, the content and/or sources - as well as the wording (tone, verify covered by the source, etc.) - is reviewed before the content is added to the article.--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Board member / advisory panel 

message: If someone is interested in expanding the article, there may be other content at the following sources: PBS, NBC, NPR, INC, Publishers Weekly, Fortune Magazine, America’s Best, and Bloomberg Business Week.
This was in a list of sources identified in a bio - I was able to find sources for the others in the list.--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other sources 

message: Hi ,
You added a  tag on the article. Is there something in particular that you think needs to be done to the article?
Thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , That was very helpful input. I made those changes, plus made edits to the paragraph about UN's G3ict EmployAbility Task Force. How does it look to you now?–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the tag was added back. I removed moved of the intro. The rest is essentially a summary of her work life. I have regularly worked s and continually work new pages - and brought up the issue of promotional tone on the peer review (nothing identified to fix) and am not sure why there is such attention to removing content, but hopefully the editor is happy now. Sorry for being so snarky, just very frustrated.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  News release tag