lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Omar Hayssam

message: I believe this whole article is biased, it could be because at the time it was written it was still rather fresh in people's mind and the media reported only one (deficitary) side of the argument. However, I believe it should be rewritten entirely to clearly point out when assumptions are being made as opposed to facts. Sufitul (talk) 11:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you point out where it is not clear? In the "Kidnapping" section, it says "Prosecutors claimed..." and "Romanian media speculated..." and so on, i.e. it is stated that those are speculations and claims. The article as a whole is essentially based on the news articles in the references section. If there is any claim which is not found in the news articles, you are welcome to point out and remove. --BorgQueen (talk) 11:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Black Act 1723

message: The men were known as the Waltham Blacks. The seven men were executed at Tyburn, 4th of December, 1723, for Murder and Deer-Stealing.
Sources :-
http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ng169.htm
http://www.bishopswaltham.net/History/Index.asp?cond=no  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.13.252 (talk) 20:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Wikisource handles it, I think :). Just stick it in the bottom of the page. Thanks! Ironholds (talk) 06:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Fort Meigs

message: :Slightly upstream on the Maumee are rapids. Since the British soldiers came by boat via Lake Erie and up the Maumee River from Ft. Malden in Canada- a distance of fifty miles, the rapids near Fort Meigs provided a 'choke point' which would slow up the enemy. The British battery was located near Broadway and Conant Streets in the present city of Maumee. About 1/4 mile northeast the British dug three Barbette enclosures, in which they utilized mortars to shell Fort Meigs. The remains of these enclosures can still be seen today. They are in Fort Meigs Cemetery.
:The British had previously built another fort on the opposite bank of the Maumee, about a mile and a half downstream, known today as Fort Miamis. It originally had a garrison that mustered troops to the "Battle of Fallen Timbers" which occurred on August 20, 1794. Fort Miamis was never reconstructed. Today all that remains of it are the revetments. Today the place is a municipal park for the city of Maumee.
Musicwriter (talk) 01:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strategic location of the fort 

message: Although not used in the caption, the description for the photograph has a serious error.  The uniform shown has no "facings", which were eliminated in 1810 in favor of a front closure with two rows of nonfunctional buttons joined by white lace binding.  Regulations issued in February 1812 prescribed a blue 10-button "coatee" with a red collar and cuffs (the red shown in the photo is of the collar and cuffs), with a binding lace of white for infantry and yellow for artillery. The uniform shown is an artillery uniform, but denoted by its yellow bindings. At the time of the Fort Meigs siege, the regulations were rewritten (but not in time to affect the outfitting of Harrison's army), eliminating the binding altogether except for the collars, and this uniform lasted for ten years.  Branch colors of blue for infantry and red for artillery did not become regulation until 1851.--Reedmalloy (talk) 02:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Image description
Talk:Tito Gómez (Puerto Rican singer)

message: I have classified the article as a start. It needs expansion on Gómez's musical career, a picture or pictures and an infobox. Capitalistroadster 20:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was not moved. There is now another page for another Tito Gómez. ●DanMS • Talk 16:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification
Talk:Matore

message: Talk Matore
you have to add few line about Akber nawaz khan S/o Sahahnawaz khan and his grands son Adil Nawaz khan , Azam Nawaz khan and Adnan nawaz khan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.116.219.16 (talk) 07:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

message: One of the beautifull village of uninion matore is 'Bagla Rajgaan.Late Raja Muhammad Kalid was ist chairman of union council matore.cummunities of bagla rajgaan are(janjua,kayani,quraisi,malik, choudary,Minhas,bajwa). Bagla rajgan overseas cummunity rebuilt the sherine of Dada peer kala to save the our historical,ancestors assest.prominant socail social workers are Raja zakir janjua and Dr Mansoor ali. Mansoor ali janjua (talk) 17:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bagla rajgaan
Talk:East Yorkshire (bus company)

message: The article lists Veolia in Hull as an acquisition. Is this true or did the company take over the services of formerky done by Veolia - there is a difference.83.100.141.24 (talk) 14:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Veolia

message: Not being funny, but surely there can be a better picture than the one of the 240 service currently being used! Someone from the company must view this page? Get to it!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.167.81 (talk) 20:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Impossible Dream (advertisement)

message: In Details:
The original version closes with a message addresses specifically to England, whilst the Australian version closes with a voice-over saying "I couldn't have said it better myself".
Can this be cited? I swear England has always had the 'Australian version' voice-over (except perhaps the recent re-release?).--Bhorsfall (talk) 02:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I couldn't have said it better myself
Talk:Cord Roberts

message: I'm requesting this new, orphaned article be moved to Cord Roberts; this is the more common form of the character's name, as evidenced by the fact that many other One Life to Live articles already link to Cord Roberts (currently a redirect). TAnthony 21:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page has been moved from Cordero "Cord" Roberts to Cord Roberts as the result of an uncontroversial move request listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Dekimasuよ! 01:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Engraving Copyright Act 1734

message: This Act was the first time that a visual artist's right to control copies of prints made from engravings was addressed but this Act does not use the term copy[rite] as the United States' term [sic]"copyright" since this deceptive word was coined by Noah_Webster in 1789/1790 when copying the Statute_of_Anne. This term intentionally failed to address individual rights that were included in (8 Geo. II. cap. 13). This was done to create clients for lawyers and allow elementary colonial school textbook standardization and Americanized establishment of a new language, like where color replaced colour. This Act was NEVER titled as is done here in egregious error. Please examine the full textand point out what justifies use herein of a word coined 40+ years later when Noah_Webster and Benjamin_Huntington copied the Statute_of_Anne in the United States' [sic] "Copyright_Act_of_1790". I suggest Engraver's Act or Hogarth's Act.  The usage of dates in titles often attempts to be or spur content debate within the title and is superfluous.
CurtisNeeley (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In the talk page for the Statute of Anne I've noted that Blackstone refers to "copyright" before 1790 in Great Britain. I haven't seen any evidence that copyright as a term was invented by Webster. You'd need to find a citation for that. It is correct to say that the 1734 Act does not use the term "copyright" (I think) and there is some controversy as to whether it should properly be considered a copyright act. Nevertheless that is how it is later described. In particular by short titles legislation which is definitive as to short titles (so it can't be "in error" - although it could be anachronistic). I am afraid I don't really follow the rest of what you say. It is certainly worth discussing these things before jumping in. Francis Davey (talk) 23:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested correction of CLEAR factual error
Talk:RV Calypso

message: WHAT ABOUT SOME STATS ON THER SHIP PEOPLE!!!!
I have no idea how to add links and do not have enough time but the Calypso will not be a static exhibit as stated in this article.  Please see here http://www.cousteau.org/news/calypso-saved and here for details on its new propulsion engines http://www.cousteau.org/news/engines  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.205.198.22 (talk) 12:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To little coverage has been given to the long active history of the Calypso and to much political coverage has been given to the disputes surrounding the Calypso's fate. That would be best covered in another article about restoring the Calypso. Most come here to read about the exploits in her active career and not a second wife fighting with Cousteau's first wife's children and the shipyard in charge of her restoration. I cannot say I am surprised as wikipedia is becoming more and more a place for people and admins included if not the puppet masters of promoting personal opinions and agendas. 172.56.11.75 (talk) 00:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Much of the Article Reads like a Political Opinion Piece

message: People keep adding a random piece of trivia about a model of Calypso being included in a videogame - this is the article about the real life ship, not a videogame guide. The addition of trivia to articles is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia - to be included needs in-depth coverage of the item in a WP:RS - see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Videogame trivia
Talk:Estate of Hugh Naish Act 1737

message: If the citation of this Act was correct (i.e. if it was passed in 21st regnal year of George II), it would have been passed in 1747, not 1737. Further, the Chronological Table of the Statutes (HMSO) does not list any chapter 38 of 21 Geo.2.
That book does list 11 Geo.2 c.38 and it confirms that it was to do with the "estate of Hugh Naish". That Act actually was passed in 1737 (and not ten years later as the article seems to claim).
I suggest that:
1 this Act ought to be cited as 11 Geo.2 c.38, 
2 that there may be not be a separate private Act, and 
3 if there is a private Act, it has not been cited correctly and has been given the citation of the public Act (if it is a public Act) by mistake.
Any comments? James500 (talk) 16:45, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like a minor typo by the editor that started the article. Be bold. :) Road Wizard (talk) 18:34, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I may have found the solution. The second act was 21 Geo. II c. 20 (1747). See Chronological Table of the Private and Personal Acts. Road Wizard (talk) 18:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest that the citation is wrong and that there is only one Act (namely 11 Geo.2 c.38)
Talk:M1879 Reichsrevolver

message: I removed the following from the page, I think it was supposed to be here. I have no idea what it means:
"That is not thrugh. The ejector was a seperate rod. that was fastenet in the waist belt, and used to eject the spend shells. The Missing Link. (out of Denmark)"
If anyone feels like doing something with it, you are welcome. --Muhandes (talk) 15:50, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange edit

message: So which model had the long barrel and which the short? Drutt (talk) 17:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Barrel

message: According to http://www.thegunzone.com/webley-fosbery.html, paragraph 4 and 5, this gun not only has a punch-rod extractor (presumably on the right side, to punch out empties through the loading gate), but is one of only four revolvers in history to have a safety catch designed and fitted by the maker.  I want to add this info correctly, but the cite system is damned confusing. 100.4.62.213 (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Saftey catch
Talk:Spring Park, Minnesota

message: We really need a local to start working on this page. Have a look at the cities page, and you'll find something there you can write about. You're a better editor than you think. : ) Nanabozho 21:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I am looking for this company we have a pressure washer and nedd parts  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.48.201.236 (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  searching for advance machine company
Talk:Politics of Cape Verde

message: This should probably be mentioned in the article: Cape Verde is the only African country to get a perfect score in Freedom House's evaluation of political freedom. See Freedom in the World. Brutannica 21:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: , Brutannica! =) --Waldir 01:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... I know, but I wanted to "check" here first. "Be bold," I know... Brutannica (talk) 17:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Generally, Cape Verde enjoys a stable democratic system. The elections have been considered free and fair, there is a free press, and the rule of law is respected by the State.
Then why is it in the top 25 in the Failed States Index for "Intervention of Other States or External Political Actors" ? --76.224.90.253 03:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  o rly
Talk:Full Powers

message: The only reference seems to be in reference to the UK. Are there examples of this power being used by any other government? Achowat (talk) 20:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global View 

message: 'page has been archived'.
Bs27975 (talk) 03:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Broken
Talk:Zope Object Database

message: What is a transactional database?
I think that every database must be manage transactions. Without this feature you will earn the totally chaos. For every database exist a set of rules which describes the states and the consitential conditions.
This term should be substituted by "only" database.
Hello.
I would like to ask for an external link from the zodb article to 
blogory.org/zodb
I run blogory.org, so it would be  conflict of interest for me to edit the web page.  But someone else can do it.
Blogory.org/zodb contains 63 links and postings about the ZODB.  It took months of work to go through all the Google listings, and link to the interesting ones.  I think it would be a big addition to the zodb pages to have it added.
Regards
Chris
Clozinski (talk) 14:45, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Treaty of Fontainebleau (1762)

message: How does Louisiana France get divided into two (west Mississippi Spain and east Mississippi Britain) if they the French sell what is west (1762 given to Spain) sold BY FRANCE to British USA in 1803 already belonging to Spain those 40 years?  If the French gave the East to Britain those 40 years without telling them they already gave it to Spain; now we have the west given to Spain also, but British USA is buying it in 1803 from France not from Spain. What goes! Does the French sell what they already gave to others? I sell you my mistress, when infact I keep my mistress and sell you my wife so i can claim her back  in court! Sheesh sounding like the 1984 American Motors Corp 14 week Alliance and 10,000 layoff to avoid UC!  Can someone clarify? 
 72.133.177.118 (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1762 to 1803
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Environment/Environmental record task force

message: Hey all.  I figured we should start a talk page for the task force.  Not sure who did the banner, but it looks great! Nice job.  One small thought -- many of the banners I have seen have some kind of picture -- like the second one on this page or the one for the global perspectives task force.  Maybe it would be good if our banner for this task force had a picture too? Any thoughts? --Mackabean 21:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project banner
Talk:Comédie-Italienne

message: The reason why the first image is linking red is because what's there at the French Wikipedia has only been uploaded there, someone needs to transfer it over to Commons. Once that's done, it will work here. Cheers, Moreschi  Talk 09:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to Commons. Bow down at my awesomeness. Riana ⁂ 10:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Thanumalayan Temple

message: I had to remove some of the info about the Hanuman sculpture, as it was directly lifted from this article. I changed some of the text, and used it as a reference. Beyond that, it was mostly grammatical errors, and few awkward phrases that were fixed up. --Despayre (talk) 18:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit
Talk:2000 NFL draft

message: I was trying to access Michael Lewis, an undrafted free agent signed by the Eagles, mentioned in this article, however upon clicking his name it directs me to a writer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Lewis
Kringe1 (talk) 02:26, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to fix misdirected hyperlinks 

message: How are there supplemental compensatory picks in the middle of a round, let alone a round that isn't the seventh? Samer (talk) 22:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: These were given to the Browns due to their being an expansion team in 1999. They should be labeled the same way as in 1999 NFL Draft. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:04, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improperly labeled picks? 

message: Tom Brady is basically a shoo in. Maybe make a note for his HOF addition eventually. 173.216.89.245 (talk) 08:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second HOF player
Talk:Upcycling

message: I'm glad that this topic is being covered! If I might suggest, your lead paragraph describes the definition of upcycling concisely. However, there is no additional information. It would be helpful to give the reader a summary of your page so that they know the topics that are being covered. I think this will help improve the quality of your page as well! Perhaps a separate section for some history as well?
Anonymous Poe-it (talk) 01:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Paragraph
Talk:HD 154345 b

message: This article is riddled with errors.  
The planet was first announced in Wright et al. 2007.  That is its only appearance in the literature.  In that work, its orbit is described as incomplete and its mass uncertain.  It was not "discovered" in 2006 then "confirmed" in 2007 -- there was only one paper.
According to Wright et al. 2007:
The possible orbital distances are 5-23 AU, not 9AU as stated in the article.
The orbit may or may not be eccentric.  
Furthermore:
The "estimate" of the planet's true mass and radius is speculative;  even the minimum mass is unknown.  No citation is given -- is this original research or just a guess?  Either way it should be deleted.
The periastron distance is not stated in Wright et al. 2007 because it is not known.  The discussion of disruption of HZ planets is guesswork at worst, original research at best.
The discussion about rings and moons is pure fantasy -- the likelihood of either can be based on nothing but comparison with Jupiter and Saturn.  
The discussion about the planet's appearance is speculative, and has no citation.
The reference to Wright et al. 2007 supports almost nothing written in the article.
I'm willing to go through and clean this article up, but since that would essentially mean re-writing the whole thing I'll let the authors defend their work first. Enfolder 22:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:USS Aeolus (ARC-3)

message: I started with DANFS, checked several other common web resources, and relied on Polmar to resolve any discrepancies. So I added an "ARC-3" page and a "USNS Aeolus" page that both redirect to the main article, just in case. Re-used the photo from the existing
uss turandot article. -- DaveMarr 22:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tumor lysis syndrome

message: Hello everyone, I am a fourth year medical student who will be editing the Tumor lysis syndrome page as part of a Wikipedia elective course at my institution. In particular, I have noticed that many statements are in need of references. I plan to go through each statement in the article and assigning high quality references where appropriate. I also plan to add information to the articles from high quality sources, or make adjustments as needed to existing statements in the article to align information to those sources. I also plan to make edits to improve the article’s overall readability wherever possible. 
As part of my proposed work plan, I plan to achieve certain goals by each of the following dates: 
3/3: Choose Wikipedia article. Find high quality, non-primary sources. Post my workplan on the article’s talk page.  
3/11: Finish first round of edits adding references to existing statements without a current reference. Make any changes to existing statements to align to newly cited references. 
3/18: Additional edits including those aimed to improve the article’s grammar and overall readability as needed. Consider including a “pathophysiology” section and/or “prognosis” section as suggested in the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Edits to article to undergo peer-review from another student in the elective. 
3/25: Course wrap-up. Review all changes, incorporate any changes/feedback from peer-review process. 
WikiUser950 (talk) 19:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Elective Course editing plan 

message: This article was categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. Calmer Waters 04:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: doi:10.1056/NEJMra0904569 is the NEJM review that has just appeared. JFW | T@lk 22:58, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEJM 

message: UK - adults and children. Only focuses on haematological malignancies. doi:10.1111/bjh.13403 JFW | T@lk 12:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guideline
Talk:Wales and Berwick Act 1746

message: I have no opinion on this (edits today) either way. However, it raises an interesting point that affects numerous wp articles. An act of parliament is primary - the opinion of the parliament. What that it means should be confirmed by a RSS. I think a judges ruling amounts to a RSS in that regard. It is not up to us to interpret the law, however obvious the law might appear to be. Taking that line means we have a problem of lack of RSSs. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 22:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpreting the act
Talk:Montenegrin passport

message: The beginning sentence of this article currently states: "…is the primary document of international travel issued by the Montenegro."
Is it meaning to say "…by Montenegro." or "…by the Montenegro [authority/government/ministry]." or something else?  mdkarazim (talk) 11:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning Sentence 

message: A sentence in the Entry Refusal section states "…Ministry of Home Affairs but as of, Montenegrin citizens can obtain visas…"
No date is shown…what should the date be?  mdkarazim (talk) 11:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry Refusal 