Talk:Mil Mi-17

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/news121965.html
*:Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
*http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newsrosobornexport-mi-171e-china
*:Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: it is posible to add troops/civilians capacity for versions ? it will be greatly helpfull.
2A00:1028:9198:E50E:24D9:CE98:B471:EFBD (talk) 21:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  troops capacity 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Mil Mi-17's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "World Air Forces 2019":
From List of Mil Mi-8/17 operators: 
From NHIndustries NH90: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Mil Mi-17]] 

message: since the present main pic on the article is of a historical Afghan airforce i think it be replaced by this one
 PHANTOM 2004 (talk) 10:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not an article covering current users and use of the helicopter, so there is no issue with retaining the Afghan photo in the infobox, even if the colour scheme of the Afghan air force has since changed following the taliban takeover.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the Main MI17 Picture of the article be changed?