lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Turrican

message: Wouldn't it make more sense to use the plot described in the manual for the original computer versions rather than the one in the console ports published by Accolade/Ballistic?
-
PROLOGUE
A story of times long gone by, tells us of the three-headed Morgul, who lives
a secluded life in his kingdom. This Morgul is the cause of all the fears
and nightmares of mankind. It is furthermore said, that in ancient times he
was banished to an unknown dimension by the hero Devolon. Fear and
sleepless nights disappeared out of peoples lives.
For some time now people have again been tormented by nightmares and suffer
from a series state of dread and fear. Hardly anybody dares to set a foot
on the streets at night and a dreadful fear that Morgul has returned to is
kingdom is alive in the peoples minds again. As the only man on earth whos
courage has not yet deserted him, you are sent off, once again to free
human kind of its burden of fear. You have been armed with the latest
weapons and techinical equipment for this mission. Find Morgul in his
kingdom, and destroy him for once and for all.
-
2603:9001:630A:3900:5D9D:5159:A18:8DBC (talk) 23:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO, if different versions have different plots, then all should be listed. Iapetus (talk) 14:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:USS New Hampshire (SSN-778)

message: Several phrases in this article are lifted directly from the cited sources. This should be rewritten in an original voice. 71.56.242.55 (talk) 00:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Want to point out these phrases?  We can rewrite or quote as is necessary. gren グレン 09:35, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Rwbems added,
: "... christened four months later, on 21 June 2008, 220 years to the day of the ratification of the US Constitution by the state of New Hampshire, ..."
And indeed, United States Constitution#Ratification does say that New Hampshire ratified on 21 June 1788. And as the 9th state to do so, put the Constitution into effect. But was the ship's christening date chosen for that reason, or just a coincidence?
—WWoods (talk) 05:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christening date 

message: Is this not the ship Fry visited when he was touring the States? SGGH speak! 12:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Stephen Fry]] 

message: Since this is the first Block II boat, it should be explained what the features are.Phd8511 (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Block II 
Talk:Shakespear's Sister

message: I'm fairly sure the correct name is 'Shakespears Sister', with no punctuation - that's how the albums were credited at the time. As it's a moot point and not too significant, I'll set up a redirect rather than moving the page. (Reason: I couldn't find this article). --kingboyk 02:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why the following mention - "The term Shakespeare's Sister first appeared in a section of the Virginia Woolf work......"? The title of this article does not have a third letter e in Shakespear, but the Woolf work does. There is no explanation why or if the Woolf work influenced the band name. Moriori 02:55, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The story I heard behind the spelling of the name was that they were going to be called "Shakespeare's Sister", but that the person designing their logo misspelled the name, and they decided to leave it that way (particularly as the spelling of the name wasn't standardised in Shakespear's (sic ;)) day). Better to confirm that fact before including in the article though. Fourohfour 16:21, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:USS New Hampshire (1864)

message: The phrase "on the stocks" is used multiple times in the article, but is never defined. It is possible this is a common nautical term, but is definitely not something in common usage. The meaning seems easy enough to guess from the context, but it would be better if defined.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:100B:C066:142D:749:4349:94E3 (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

message: Removed old blue infobox and replaced with new ship infobox, Wikified text, making an attempt to retain all modifications from the original page submission. Converted book ref to citebook. Added flags, See Also, additional ref, cats, etc.
Could not find link to New York Navy Militia, although there is one for Pennsylvania and for Massachusetts. Other redlines should be investigated and linked also.Wikited (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page
Talk:Danny Deever

message: Nice small article, good job Jaranda wat's sup 20:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: The novel Starship Troopers refers to this poem when one mentions that a trooper will be hung for crimes ("making one dance 'Danny Deever'.")  Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article somewhere? --Micahbrwn (talk) 08:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture/literary references? 

message: I made these corrections based on the unabridged audio book. See: https://youtu.be/EOQMpb_R41Y?t=10097. Rklawton (talk) 21:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Starship Troopers]]
Talk:Quetiapine

message: Is this in the compounding of this medicine? 174.218.214.115 (talk) 15:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codeine 

message: Hi everyone. I've been taking Quetiapine for a long time, and can definitely say it has a good effect on Anxiety. It helps you relax and feel better, and its a great medication. I've been searching for good sources for that, although its already stated in the article itself it can be used for anxiety, I believe. But let me say this. Qutiapine definitely helps with all 3 major problems, which are Depression, Anxiety and Schizophernia. The only problem is it makes you very sleepy. I've been taking the lowest dose, 25 mg, so I can be able to focus on work and studies, and so on. This is an amazing medication which had changed my life. I was born with Asperger syndrome, and I cant believe how much this medication had helped me. Noam111g (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles' talk pages are not a forum: . As you say, the article already mentions what you're saying your personal experience has been. Kimen8 (talk) 11:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this, this is simply a page for a drug, what it does and how it functions, this is not a forum, thanks for reminding this user. Databoose43 (talk) 17:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quetiapine and Anxiety 

message: Hello, i was reading one of the papers in reference to the receptor binding affinity table on the wiki page and its binding affinities/actions on the respective receptors.
One of the reference papers, which was not paywaled (which i may add was quite high quality), clearly did state that it believes to be an antagonist, and not just an inverse agonist, with the statement "Quetiapine is a histamine H1 receptor antagonist", now this does not prove it is (although i strongly believe it is), but considering the quality of this paper i am more learning towards being convinced of this claim.
This is all fine and dandy, and to be clear, i am still genuinely convinced quetiapine is a full H1 antagonist, however the paper i take issue with , mentions within the abstract, that the histamine 1 receptor blockade is as a result of Clozapine, and while somewhat similar drugs, are not the same as quetiapine, now in the full paper, it goes on to test Astemizole for histamine blockade, which is a completely different drug from quetaipine, and at no point in the full paper is quetiapine even mentioned in regards to the H1 receptor or antihistamangerigc activity at all
I think this particular reference should be removed, but i encourage other users to chime in on this please. Databoose43 (talk) 18:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with one of the papers referenced in regards to quetiapine's antihistamanergic activitiy.
Talk:Ply

message: Should the two parts of this page be split? --Nucleusboy 03:34, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Arvindn 14:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Agree we should merge the textile parts of ply into plying (and perhaps make ply a disambiguation page? - PKM 21:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 100% support that change. - PKM (talk) 19:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I've not seen anyone else ever weigh in on this issue, I've gone ahead and done so. However, I'm not sure what to do with the extra info still there about toilet paper and plywood. Thoughts? Loggie (talk) 21:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: 1) Explain difference between a ply and a laminate. I.e., that some ply is a laminate.
2) Toilet paper article is clearer about difference between one-ply and two-ply.
3) The noun ply has five main senses in the OED -- from a quick look it appears that the nautical verb "ply" has been confused as being a noun in this article.
67.180.48.201 (talk) 08:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Directions for article expansion
Talk:USS Henry Clay

message: I wonder if someone can help me. The statement that the USS Henry Clay (SSBN-625) is the only US ship named after Henry Clay is troubling me. There was a Union ship named Henry Clay that was sunk while running the blockade at Vicksburg during the Civil War. Please see the text accompanying 
:Image:VicksburgBlockade.jpg. It says "all USS except as noted", but I cannot figure  out where its noted or not. At first I thought the transports were perhaps not USS, but the Tuscumbia is listed as a transport and IS named USS T. 
Is the USS Henry Clay (SSBN-625) really the only one? If so, any way of determining this would help me with this image and other articles. Thanks for any help - PAR 03:35, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question!  It seems to me that the transports were not commissioned (not USS), and that Tuscumbia was a gunboat, not a transport .  In any case, DANFS only lists the submarine Henry Clay.  I'd love to prove the official Navy history wrong, but I don't have a lot of hope that we can do so. ;-> ➥the Epopt 04:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Louisville; Mound City; Pittsburgh; Carondelet; transports Silver Wave, Forest Queen & Henry Clay; and Tuscumbia.
Notice the placement of the colons, the Silver Wave, Forest Queen & Henry Clay are grouped together. Thanks for the help, I didn't know the Tuscumbia was a gunboat. PAR 04:55, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only one?
Talk:Bob Dorough

message: In a segment just now aired on NPR, they mentioned something about how Davis claimed the credits on this song for decades and Dorough didn't receive his credit until Davis' death. I wasn't listening closely, so I can't add the details right now, but usually they post these pieces online later. Wanted to mention it here so someone can add the info once it's available. Lawikitejana (talk) 14:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rights/credits on "Blue Xmas" 

message: {{subst:trim|1=
l jazz
: Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Additionally, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 18:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 July 2022
Talk:Placebo (band)

message: I would like to work on this article a bit, seeing as it is not properly sourced. The main issue is that there are not enough sources for their early career - most articles covering the 1996-2003 period could be found on their site only (which is now archived). Would it be okay to use those as long as I clarify that the articles come from third-party sources and were merely hosted on their site? Eva Mitocondriala (talk) 19:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article in need of improvement 

message: Where did the update to the discography yesterday come from? What is the source for the new album title? CiallNollins (talk) 11:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the unsourced bs. Thanks! Robvanvee 12:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: Beyond the fact of their being formed in London -- stated separately in any case -- I'm struggling to see how a "Scottish-American" and a (possibly British-naturalised?) Swede who met in Luxembourg constitute an "English" band.  "British" might be a slight improvement, but maybe we should just skip a band-demonym entirely.  109.255.211.6 (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  English band? 

message: there is a link in Other Awards, 2006 Kerrang! Awards for the song Infra-Red but the hyperlink goes to the scientific page of Infra-red light. Correct link should be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infra-Red_(Placebo_song). I looked at the "Edit Source" and did not see where to correct it.  Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infra-Red_(Placebo_song)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackie.Elle (talk • contribs) 19:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link
Talk:Typhoon Babe (1977)

message: Content is good.  The storm history and impact need to be separated to give the article a little structure.  Some grammar also needs fix. Jdorje 19:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed a few "shes" in the article.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:18, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: The storm track shows Babe of the Atlantic. What's with that!Icelandic Hurricane 21:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because there was a Babe in the Atlantic at the same time, and the Atlantic Babe got its track map first. Hurricanehink 20:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, when I first decided on the naming format for the track maps I asked Eric if the had ever been 2 storms in the same year with the same name, but I don't think I waited to get an answer.  Babe's not the only one...there also the Alices of 1954 (which I called Alice1 and Alice2).  Now for my next question...which Babe was first, the Atlantic or Pacific one? — jdorje (talk) 21:46, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Hm, nevermind about the order.  But the question is: are there any other instances of 2 named storms with the same name in the same year? — jdorje (talk) 21:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WPAC Babe reached TS status only 24 hours before Atlantic Babe. A quick check on the List of tropical cyclone names used in more than one basin shows these:
*Alex (1998)- Atlantic and WPAC
*Alice (1953)- Atlantic and WPAC, 2 Alices in Atlantic in 1954
*Betty (1972)- Atlantic and WPAC
*Carmen (1974)- A and WPAC
*Fabian (1985)- A and WPAC
*Irma (1978)- A and WPAC
*Linda (1997)- EPAC and WPAC
Hurricanehink 22:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Ugh.  Where does this list come from?  Digital Typhoon shows no Alex of 1998 (but does show Alice of 1953). — jdorje (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unisys and JTWC show an Alex in 1998. Hurricanehink 01:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Requester has not given any evidence or reasoning behind why this particular typhoon is the primary topic. (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 02:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Typhoon Babe (1977) →  – There were Typhoons named Babe in also other years. However, 1977 Babe caused the most damage. --126.208.11.200 (talk) 02:07, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 December 2022
Talk:Shape optimization

message: The page has been updated to include general shape optimization along with topology optimization.  Is intended to include things such as parametric shape optimization?  If so, I think we need to have more information on that subject and possibly separate the topics.  Also, you removed the links to FEA codes on the FEM website, should we do the same here? - EndingPop 12:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Term Confusion

message: Please avoid adding links to websites of companies selling topology optimization software. This is in violation of WP:External links. See #4 in the linked section. - EndingPop 21:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Malthusian growth model

message: The "e" in the malthus formula needs to be explained as all the other denotations are.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.68.230 (talk) 11:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just the number e. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_(mathematical_constant) 65.12.163.209 (talk) 23:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: e

message: This so called Malthusian growth model is really the exponential growth model as used in economics, biology, demography, and several other disciplines. It is well explained in several other articles not connected to this one. This one seems to have few facts. It seems to be here only because someone thought it was nice to have something with the name malthus on it. It is an over interpretation of the title of the one cited article which was written for a specific purpose and limited scope. If this really is called the Malthusian model by anyone else please write me a reply and make sure that I see it. Otherwise I nominate this article for deletion as having little or no value not found in other articles about population growth and demography.
74.77.123.229 (talk) 21:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and would be open seeing this merge with exponential growth model. Some more of the information could perhaps be added to the main Malthus article as well. —Zujine|talk 05:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This page is redundant with several others
Talk:Joe Amato (dragster driver)

message: Uhh, what yr did he turn the 260 & 280? Where? What event? (And the e.t., if you can find it...)  Trekphiler 04:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions
Talk:1900 British Columbia general election

message: Went ahead with alphabetic order here, although tempted to move the Opposition (Conservative) Vancouver City members up to be on the same line/row as the Government members for the same riding; did this with Esquimalt in 1903 or 1907.  Normally, also, the Opposition column would be separated into parties, then alphabetized.  Parties were not official in 1900 and most of these designations were haphazard affairs, more assigned by newspapers than declared by candidates; they are not even slates, but "positions" relative to the political situation of the time.  "Independent Opposition" or "Opposition Independent" would tend to mean the member conceives of himself as an Independent but he is not pro-Government (whereas that's what Independent Government would be, and those would be on the government side, as their vote goes with the government, or is supposed to.  From this year onwards party division will be the standard; but for previous years it's a haphazard affairs, since the "party" assignments were only on the hustings, not even necessarily still the alignment at the opening of the elected House; and what had been "Opposition" has become the Government, and vice-versa.  In some later years independents who voted with the government may be appropriately put on the left, however.Skookum1 04:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Placement of split multi-member ridings
Talk:Trinity Repertory Company

message: Just to mention, but I did use the website as reference, but it's also a paraphrase, so no, it's not verbatim, and therefore it's kosher. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 04:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The photos do not show the "Trinity theatre."  The building is actually the Majestic Theatre, or the Lederer more recently, and the theatre is home to the Trinity Repertory Company.  (The company dropped the "Square" from its name some time ago, although I do not recall when.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Desertpapa (talk • contribs) 19:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo captions
MediaWiki talk:Acct creation throttle hit

message: May I change the wording to something a little less engineer-ish? Maybe something along the lines of:
 You have created $1 accounts, which surpasses the maximum allowable limit, and cannot create any more.
 If you have a special need to create more accounts, please contact a(n) ______ (admin/bureaucrat/steward/dev?) to request a higher number.
I think it would be helpful for admins to be able to grant more accounts to legitimate schools and such. Any ideas? -Mysekurity(have you seen this?) 04:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you must also consider the pitfalls of granting more accounts as this could lead to an abuse of the system as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 03:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording 

message: You have created $1 accounts, which exceeds the maximum allowable limit. As a result, you cannot create any more accounts at the moment.
 If you have a special need to create more accounts, please make a request on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard for the limit to be temporarily raised.
Mark 04:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Admins don't have the ability to change the limit. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

text: True, they do not have this ability. --Siva1979Talk to me 20:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My suggestion 

message: There are frequent complaints sent to info-en@wikimedia.org by AOL users about the inability to create accounts.  I have updated the text accordingly.
The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you know the reason for this inability? --Siva1979Talk to me 03:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AOL 

message: It doesn't seem necessary or appropriate to link "proxy detection" to a google search.  There is already an internal link to Proxy server, and if anything "proxy detection" should point to a how-to article.  It is biased to use Google for this purpose.  Please remove the link.  Thanks129.49.24.222 (talk) 21:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm refusing this request because Google is the search engine Wikipedia generally uses. Users have a choice between a number of different programs; Google just provides the list. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google
Talk:Milan Stojadinović

message: :Milan Stoyadinovich July 28, 1888 - October 24, 1961 was the Prime Minister of Yugoslavia from 1936 to 1939. He was an admirer of the fascist governments of Italy and Germany and during his tenure in that office, moved Yugoslavia into a closer relationship with these two countries. His political party was ousted from power in elections early in 1939.
Dates are different. (I don't have idea which are the thruth.) In all others ways, this article (Milan Stojadinović) is much better. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 04:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the page Milan Stoyadinovich 

message: Djokić states August 4th as the birth-date, however several other sources provide July 23rd: Britannica, Universalium Academic (ru), Dictionary of Meaning.  I left this alone for now because these dates are 12 days apart and it is likely that this is a Julian/Gregorian issue, although I couldn't find any references that stated either date was O.S. or N.S.Wiseprincebambi (talk) 04:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth-date 