Talk:Mexican Federal Highway

message: "Mexican Federal Highway" looks as if it adequately reflects the intent of the article. But it attempts to use the language and grammar of one country to explain the language and grammar of another. By using examples from the English side what is being said is "US" "US" ""Highway" because just as in the US the highest level of government is federal (federales). When you refer to something as Mexico or Mexican you are referring to the top level of recognition within the host country. If it is dealing with government then it is federal. The people of Mexico generally do not refer to their institutions and programs as Mexico or Mexican because the topic is somewhat already defined as a matter of course as of Mexico and anything more along that line is redundant or presumed as understood by the host country to be a bad attempt at translating. I would hope that it was never any one's intention within WP to intentionally insult another country through bad translating. Translating is more than plugging in meaning for individual words--context can mean everything. I would hope at WP that people that need to rely on translations do so without prejudicial ignorance. There is nothing more frustrating that to put something forth that does not serve the purpose of one people understanding another, or what they put forth gives me the indication that what is being put forth may not be adequate, or that the inadequacies are so repetitive that it is irresponsible to put it forth. WP prides itself on using a level of English grammar that should to the best abilities of WP present its work but if what is presented is not the best that can be then those that champion inadequacy can be creating for the system problems that will take for the future. English grammar rules for topics that are English/American may best serve them but a topic from a country or language other than English/American may not adequately serve the purpose especially when there is a practice of exceptions especially for awkwardness. Articles of a non-English/American base may need more than just plugging the meaning(s) of words from one language into that of the other without regard to context of the host country. There may be good reason to follow "Federal Highway (Mexico)". After that then I guess there may need to be an explanation as to one nation calling it a federal system and the other federal corridors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:9143:7000:6547:74C2:31CB:9098 (talk) 11:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  article name -- impovement(s) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mexican Federal Highway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060902004012/http://portal.sct.gob.mx/SctPortal/appmanager/Portal/Sct?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=P24095 to http://portal.sct.gob.mx/SctPortal/appmanager/Portal/Sct?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=P24095
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: There seems to be Some Federal Highways or Sections of them that Are Autopistas Or as The Mexican Call them Autopistas Libres AnglofileBritain (talk) 04:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexican Federal Highways that look like Autopistas but without Tolls