lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Landau–Zener formula

message: I can not verify source 1 in this article:
"L. Landau (1932). "Zur Theorie der Energieubertragung. II". Physics of the Soviet Union 2: 46–51."
Please provide information on where to find this article, resp. which Journal it has been published in. I am unable to verify the existence of a Journal "Physics of the Soviet Union 2".
Thanks for help.
87.147.221.193 (talk) 22:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Some papers cite the paper as "Landau L 1932 Phys. Z. Sowj. 2 46" or similar, and a Google Scholar search indeed gives "Phys. Z. Sowjetunion" as the name of the Journal. 130.233.204.60 (talk) 08:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can not verify source 1 in this article 

message: Hello! I have shortened the image description and reordered the lede as a first attempt to make it more digestable to address the concern in []. -- Lpd-Lbr (talk) 13:50, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not agree with the change. The article lost some important technicalities. --MaoGo (talk) 14:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with Your assesment: I have added one additional sentence to the introduction and restructured it. Nothing in the text of the article was removed. I did cut down the description of the image, since it is too technical. Will You agree with my change to change the lede and leave the description of the image? --Lpd-Lbr (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The too technical template addresses most of the article not just the lead. The lead seems ok. The lead is very precise it is a particular formula to calculate the transitions in a 2-level quantum model. I used part of your edition to simplify the image and to add a Template:Short description.--MaoGo (talk) 19:50, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adressing Too Technical of Nov. 2018
Talk:Battle of Klock's Field

message: This article as originally written had no inline citations, lacked background detail, and contained erroneous information. An extensive rewrite was needed. 
The Battle of Klock's Field was the culmination of a deep-penetration raid on the Schoharie and Mohawk River Valleys. Details about Johnson's route from Oswego, about the attack on the Schoharie Valley, and about Van Rensellaer's march from Schenecdaty have been added.
The only comprehensive secondary source I have found about the battle is Watt's The Burning of the Valleys. The battle is described in early histories such as Stone's Life of Joseph Brant, and Green's The Story of Old Fort Plain, however, these accounts are highly biased and poorly sourced. 
One notable error in the article was the statement that Johnson, Bulter, and Brant "escaped on horseback, leaving the men to fend for themselves." While this claim appears in Stone, it is not supported by any other sources.
The article also stated that the burning of Stone Arabia happened before Brown was defeated when all sources agree that it happened afterwards. 
Many historical writers incorrectly assume that Brant "commanded" the indigenous warriors not only at Klock's Field but at Oriskany and other battles. Brant, however, had no official role within the Iroquois Confederacy. In 1777 the Iroquois elected Cornplanter and Sayenqueraghta as their war chiefs, and it was they who led the indigenous warriors at Klock's Field, although it appears that their warriors had a limited role and were the first to withdraw.
Brant did recruit and lead a highly effective force known as Brant's Volunteers. These roughly 200 indigenous and Loyalist volunteers were the men he "commanded" at Klock's Field.
Barbara Graymont's The Iroquois in the American Revolution and Isabel Kelsay's "Joseph Brant: Man of Two Worlds" are excellent sources for information about Iroquois participation in the Revolutionary War. Griffin's Sword (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Rewritten
Talk:Meigs Raid

message: It seems worth noting that Meig's raiding party left from what was Guilford at the time, the terrain feature from which it is held locally that they launched (now called Meig's Point) is in what is now called Madison, Connecticut.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.197.7.22 (talk) 18:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Primary materials say the departure point was Sachem's Head in Guilford.  Meigs Point is probably named because of an early connection with the Meigs family. Magic♪piano 15:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Departure point
Talk:Norfolk IceCats

message: Proposed merging three stub articles about the same franchise into this article. Also have merged articles redirect here. Flibirigit (talk) 07:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did the merger, there was not much content in any article, and they were essential the same. --Maxim(talk) 21:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the York IceCats into the merger as well. Flibirigit (talk) 04:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Fair use rationale completed. Flibirigit (talk) 15:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MVIceCats.PNG
Talk:Heaven with a Gun

message: Re: Barbara Hershey and David Carradine being real-life husband and wife. Their respective wikipages list them as partners and not spouses so they weren't legally married. The wording is misleading here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.244.59.122 (talk) 00:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christian Conference of Asia

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://cca.org.hk/about/about.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Emphrase 15:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Christian Medical and Dental Society

message: Shouldn't this be re-named to "Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada"?VR talk 17:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-name 
Talk:Christian Methodist Episcopal Church

message: There is now a proposal for a WikiProject group, possibly initially a subproject of Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity, to deal with articles relating to the Methodist churches at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Methodism. Anyone interested in taking part in such a group should indicate their interest there. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 15:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Methodist work group 
Talk:Christian Science Sentinel

message: Hello,
Per Lightoil’s request, I am initiating a new edit request. This sentence is out of date. The Christian Science Publishing Society no longer produces a Sentinel radio edition. In its place, it now produces a podcast called Sentinel Watch. See here. The Publishing Society also no longer produces CDs or audiocassettes for this content. I’d suggest deleting this sentence and replacing it with:  Sentinel Watch is a weekly podcast, airing since 2016 on the website JSH-Online. 
The following citation could be used: 
 New audio programs coming to JSH-Onine. The Christian Science Publishing Society. Retrieved 6 June 2023. 
FirsthandPOV-CCS (talk) 19:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New edit request per above
Talk:Christian clothing

message: Much of the content of this article took the form of advertising links or unsourced non-NPOV statements. I've cleaned it up a bit, but that leaves this a rather barren article. I'm not entirely convinced this article should exist at all, but it's better now than before. Porlob (talk) 14:16, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added notability and cleanup tags to this article. Originally, this article appeared to serve as a place for various t-shirt companies to advertise. I've tried to clean it up so that is better reflects the article's title, but is it notable enough to warrant its own article, as nearly all of its content exists in more detail in other articles already? I'm not quite ready to propose deletion, but I'm not convinced it should even exist. -Porlob (talk) 15:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent changes

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://symbolsage.com/white-wedding-gown-dress/ and https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/1997/06/random-sampler/temple-bridal-dress-guidelines?lang=eng. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  DanCherek (talk) 05:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Christian theological praxis

message: The first paragraph is very unclear. "something that goes beyond practices, actions, or behaviors" - shouldn't the first paragraph give what it is, then clarify the boundaries and edges after?
"realizes the historicity of human persons" - This could be clear too.
And how does one combine something in "an incarnational way"? I may be simply picking on Jon Sobrino (from whom this quote originated); but if someone could paraphrase this in a way which is representative of their views, it would be very helpful. I wanted to do it myself, but I did not want to misrepresent the view unintentionally. - athanatos  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.111.204.180 (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Christian views on cloning

message: A big problem with many of these articles on moral theology is that it cites opinions in a way that is very sectarian, with a plurality of views going to liberal or modernistic thinkers within various denominations. Certain marginal denominations are actually made to specifically accomodate these non-traditional views, such as United Church of Christ or the Episcopal Church, and scholars from these denominations are cited in a disproportionate way. Regardless of this, it should be said that the majority view (or consensus view) tends to follow to school of thought of the pro-life movement, i.e. that life should be valued at such an extent that risky experimentations which may be harmful to human health should most likely be discouraged. ADM (talk) 08:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sectarianism
Talk:Christopher Heath (minister)

message: After saving this comment, I will save some edits to the article. At the time of saving this comment, the text of the article is verbatim the entry in the Dictionary of National Biography. I will create a citation for this, and place inline citations at the end of each paragraph and stand-alone sentence. That way, if the article is ever developed, it will be easier to keep track of which portions of text are attributable to DNB. My suggestion to anyone who develops this article is that prior to breaking up the text, simply copy-and-paste the  template next to the portion or portions of text that will be unchanged. That's a lot easier than someone coming to a fully developed article after the fact and trying to work out which bits of text were attributable to the DNB. The same issue applies to articles which are copies of text from Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, and I have commented on this problem. The best solution is to get inline citations into the text at the outset. Wotnow (talk) 22:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article development
Talk:Church Women United

message: I've assessed this article as C class for the following reasons:
*It covers the topic fairly well, however,
*It lacks reliable sources
*The language reads as if it is straight off the CWU's website (in other words it sounds promotional,)
*I made some edits to fix some of the promotional language and some style issues
To progress, reliable 3rd party sources will be needed and the language is going to have to become more neutral. Ltwin (talk) 21:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: I thought it might be appropriate to provide a reference/link to the Records of the Church Women United in the Saint Paul Area , but not sure it fits this article.  Thoughts? Archivist100 (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Records?

message: Sources are WP:PRIMARY and WP:SELFPUB, including the cache of papers by Helen McAllister. Google News indicates nothing but an obituary; Google Books turns up two self-published books and no other significant coverage by third-party sources to establish notability. Elizium23 (talk) 02:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged 
Talk:Church of Tuvalu

message: What about the Church of Scotland: "the established church of Scotland.. Protestant and Presbyterian" according to our article. Also, the online reference linked to the "only established church" statement  doesn't seem to make that claim as far as I can see. Alansplodge (talk) 20:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Church of Scotland isn't established. I'm not entirely sure what's going on with that article. -- Hazhk (talk) 23:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Only established church in the Reformed tradition"?
Talk:Churches of Christ in Christian Union

message: This article could use some love. I'm about to start working on it. 204.65.209.59 (talk) 23:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision

message: Does the church still teach or practice pacifism? Might be a valuable addition. 66.191.19.217 (talk) 01:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. See the article on Alvin York.  Rammer (talk) 04:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pacifism? 

message: A rather strange edit was made by user 66.191.158.83 and later removed by user Materialscientist. I agree with the removal, but wanted to state on the Talk page that the person who made the edit may referring to the process of "confirmation" common in many denominations of a Wesleyan flavor where a baptism of a young child or infant is "confirmed" via successful completion of a class, catechism, etc., followed by the minister and/or church's agreement. The user may also be mistaken that the CCCU equates church membership with salvation -- a common misinterpretation of Restorationist teachings (e.g. the Churches of Christ) on the great importance of joining a local church. The now-removed edit was as follows:
"They do put great importance on church membership asking non-believers to membership classes before salvation.  Explaining that you may not be a member of the church if you drink or smoke.  Many in other Christian denominations believe salvation comes first and then church membership."
2602:30A:C04E:46F0:FD18:6652:FBC:4181 (talk) 20:08, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership classes 

message: I know it can be done, but I don't know how to do it; could somebody add a line at the top of the article stating, "This article is about the branch of METHODISM. For the Church of Christ, click here." It would possibly help. 199.102.184.41 (talk) 20:39, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  01:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Conference of European Churches

message: The article should maybe explain why the Roman Catholic Church is not a member of this group. I think the official reason is that the Catholic Church doesn't participate in similar groups such as the World Council of Churches because such organizations do not recognize any kind of Roman Catholic primacy in the governance of the universal Church. ADM (talk) 12:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Roman Catholic Church

message: This site needs to be updated for developments at Lyon and afterwards. 217.41.240.15 (talk) 11:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to update after Lyon 2009
Talk:Conference of the Mennonite Brethren Churches in India

message: Adding a Controversies Section to the pages adds to NPOV of the Wikipedia article in question, The Article does not give the a neutral information when Controversies within the conferences which are present and can be established by various news articles in local news publishers. i added the controversies section in the article.Ajfben (talk) 12:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two problems with your argument. The first is that the section has been sourced entirely with :WP:PRIMARY sources. At least your recent edit added secondary sources. Facebook is not a reliable source. The second is :Wikipedia:Criticism sections should not present. They should be incorporated into the general flow of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

text: Now that I read it, the grammar is poor and the sentences make little sense. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies 
Talk:Guagua

message: Added in the pre-colonial name for Guagua, as the importance of pre-colonial awareness in these kinds of thread is essential.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.134.72.125 (talk) 07:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: @70.134.72.125 I know it's been more than a decade already, but I would love to hear the source where you got that Hokkien name from for Guagua, cuz it could not be found in any source listing Ph. Hokkien placenames nor Mandarin placenames nor even the chinese names of Filchi schools. The Hokkien pronunciation of 偎岸 (oe-hōaⁿ /ue˧ huã˥˩/) isn't phonologically sound too to the historical name of Wawa /ˈwäː.wəʔ/. Mlgc1998 (talk) 16:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hokkien name 
Talk:Congregational Methodist Church

message: This page refers to the CMC in the US, yet an older established CMC still exists in the UK. Some clarification needed perhaps and/or a seperate page for the UK church required?
The UK Congregational Methodist Church can trace its origins in the Act of Uniformity of 1662 When nearly 2000 Puritan Ministers; were expelled from the Church of England, as they could not prove Apostolic Succession and they refused to comply to this request.
MBorrill (talk) 08:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Country of Origin
Talk:Constructive theology

message: I note that the use of the term "Constructive" in relation to theology goes back to the late 19th century, and the writings of (amongst others) Alfred Ernest Garvie (1861-1945) - for a list of books see COPAC.  In particular there was a series called "The Library of Constructive Theology" published by Nisbet & Co Ltd from the 1920s to the early 1960s, at one time edited jointly https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EvuUBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA74 (Google Books preview) Four Philosophical Anglicans by Alan P F Sell by Walter Robert Matthews, who studied under Garvie, and Henry Wheeler Robinson.
Since the current Wikipedia article (as at 10 Feb 2017) seems to refer solely to more modern developments, it would be good to know whether the earlier usage refers to the same thing.--PeterR2 (talk) 15:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: History of Constructive Theology