lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jacques Félix Emmanuel Hamelin

message: The refs suggest he was known as Emmanuel SatuSuro 03:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I translated the Jacques Félix Emmanuel Hamelin article.
It could use some cleaning up and rewording, but there was a good deal of detail and lots of useable facts in the French version.  I also added a few bits of information from articles linked to in the French version as they were pertinent.
-FaerieInGrey 13:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe but we are going to have to get a handle on what he was known as - the refs I have come across suggest the Jacques Felix were not commonly used - and now we have baron - we need a standardisation sooner than later - Emmanuel Hamelin, Baron Hamelin or what> SatuSuro 14:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen both Emmanuel Hamelin and Emanuel Hamelin (with one 'm') commonly used.  It seems his full and correct name is Jacques Félix Emmanuel Hamelin, so I reckon it'd be best to leave the article title as it is (which also then stays in synch with the fr wikipedia article) and use redirects as needed.  I've created two redirects as above.  I'm inclined to refer to him in articles as "Baron Emmanuel Hamelin", which appears as Baron Emmanuel Hamelin. -- I@n 15:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks like good reasoning to me - but when referring specifically to his activities on the west coast prior to his elevation - the Emmanuel Hamelin master of the Naturaliste would seem appropriate oui? :) SatuSuro 15:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely oui. More needed though - diversion to timor, dirk hartogs plate, encounter bay, port jackson. -- I@n 16:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Hmm, beware: the French article is mostly a copy-paste from Biographie des célébrités militaires des armées de terre et de mer de 1789 à 1850, published in 1852. It tends to be more lyrical than bothered by facts. It is good, but to be taken with a grain of salt. Rama (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated from French Wikipedia
Talk:Worldwide Youth in Science and Engineering

message: * I would like to make a formal request to add http://www.celtickane.com/computers/cs.php to the external links section of this page.  It is my own website, so I wouldn't like to add it myself, but I would prefer that someone else review the website, and make the decision to add it.  It contains a very useful Computer Science WYSE study guide that would be extremely useful to anyone interested in WYSE or Computer Science. --Sugarskane 04:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for external link addition
Talk:Zigong

message: Can someone post an actual photo of the latern festival from Zigong?
Phreakster 1998 15:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual photo of the latern festival? 

message: I think there should be another map. This map does not help a lot to locate Zigong. Pukkie 05:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map not clear. 

message: Was thinking that we could add some information about plans for an airport and high speed rail to Zigong. There is also some plans for land development and also a university. Just a suggestion that we could work on  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FOSBusters (talk • contribs) 10:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development 
Talk:Footloose (1984 soundtrack)

message: I originally intended to add quotation marks to the last Track listing of: "# Mossman Boogie - 4:30" but instead I removed it entirely. Here's why:
#There was no source listed for this item.
#I found no such song in a google search.
#I saw no such song on the Footloose soundtrack cover.
#Neither wikipedia nor imdb.com had any reference to a "moss" or "mossman" from the movie Footloose.
I wanted to open this for discussion. Please correct me and add this back if you think I was wrong. Thanks. Fallendarling (talk) 20:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Track listing section

message: Should we move this from Footloose (soundtrack) to Footloose (soundtracks)?  allixpeeke (talk) 20:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?
Talk:Fusagasugá

message: This article lacks sources. Did the original spanish text have them? Someone needs to put them in. --Lendorien 00:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lacks sources
Talk:Free Love Freeway

message: I've removed the lyrics as I don't think they belong in this article (at least not a copy/paste verion of them). --Douglas Whitaker 04:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: Not sure if it actually belongs in the article, but there has been much talk about the similartiy of this song and Mika's "We are golden."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.156.44.24 (talk) 11:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  We are golden
Talk:Arab states of the Persian Gulf

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not Moved (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 19:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Arab states of the Persian Gulf →  – None of these states refer to the Gulf as Persian, see for example Gulf Cooperation Council, formally the "Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf". This is explained at the article Persian Gulf naming dispute. The word Persian here seems unnecessarily WP:POINTy, and fails the "naturalness" test in WP:CRITERIA. Onceinawhile (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 December 2022 

message: It seems like this article is not monitored much. There are vandals repeatedly changing the term "Persian Gulf" to "Arabian Gulf," in all instances where the term is present. I suggest locking this page to stop these vandals.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkParker1221 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent vandals changing "Persian Gulf" to "Arabic Gulf"  

message: I made an edit of the Arabic name to reflect the actual Arabic name, but Iranian user "Bijanii" reversed it and even completely removed the Arabic name in an article discussing Arab states! He seems perhaps upset the Arabic name is different than the Iranian and English names, but these are the facts and that person is doing a nationalism-based editing. 176.224.61.226 (talk) 07:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edit was reverted because it is an example of WP:POV; there is also no English-language WP:RS for the term “Arabian Gulf states”. See the section below.--Bijanii (talk) 07:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Arabic name and an Iranian user 

message: There is persistent WP:Vandalism and WP:POV from Arab users adding the term “Arabian Gulf states”. There hasn’t been a single reliable English-language source added that meets WP:RS with the term “Arabian Gulf states”. Requests to discuss in the talk page have not been met either. Bijanii (talk) 07:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persistent vandalism & POV from Arab users adding the term “Arabian Gulf states”
Wikipedia talk:Intentionally permanent red link

message: As we can't need too many of these types of permanent red links ("The Weather in London" and "red link" ought to be plenty, no?), and since there is overwhealming consensus that those pages should remain without articles or redirects, perhaps it would be simplest to just protect the pages. --jwandersTalk 08:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You cannot protect a page which does not exist.  And if you put Template:deleted up to protect it then it exists and is no longer a redlink. --Henrygb 13:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which I think would be a good idea; there are more suitable IPRL targets, and editors (even if they aren't aware of this guideline) will find alternatives once they attempt to use red link or the weather in London and see that the links are no longer red. NeonMerlin 15:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protect the pages 

message: If somebody wants a red link that bad, why not pipe it with an impossible article title, like:
*red link. renders as: red link. 
*red link
Any thoughts? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 07:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Examples of red links are usually demonstrated to new editors, some of whom might be confused by a link not going where it looks like it does. -- kenb215 14:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why not just link to asldfwone aoeih feoifn aowgfbero f and say, "this is an example of a red link"? ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 14:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Or, you can use formatting to make a blue link look red Elephant, but it is clearly not a normal link :S. Maybe use punctuation like Red link.? (with a full stop). or file a feature request so that a deleted page can be protected. The pages thay link to will always be showing up blue sometimes, because a new editor goes "I know what a red link is, I'm gonna write about it". Cheers, Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 00:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My thoughts

message: Template:Red link has been proposed for deletion. You're welcome to comment in the discussion. Uanfala (talk) 08:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:Red link]] up for deletion
Talk:Docosapentaenoic acid

message: Happy to see more information here on Clupadonic Acid.  Apparently, it deserves more attention than generally given.
"Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) is an n-3 fatty acid that is structurally similar to eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) but has two more carbon chain units and none more double bond." - probably, you meant ONE more double bond.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.208.61 (talk) 00:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fixed my earlier error - adrenic acid is not docosapentaenoic acid; it's docosatetraenoic acid.  David.Throop 04:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adrenic acid error
Talk:Secular music

message: Okay, just a thought. The wording in this article seems to be pretty good (or it may just be that I haven't had enough sleep) but the original poster misspelled some common words. Moreover, there was a pronunciation key in the first draft of the article as if they copied it out of a dictionary. I did some googling but was unable to find anything. It could be perfectly legit, but it just struck me as odd. --Douglas Whitaker 04:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation? 

message: Update this with more “modern” definition. I sent a young relative here to get a good definition of “secular music”.  The history is relevant and nice but no where is the term actually defined/explained in modern terms or otherwise. Torquemata (talk) 04:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better definition needed
Category talk:Pigments

message: I feel that Biological pigments should be moved up into the subcategories section. How do you do this? --Metzenberg 04:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're sure about the name, try editing :Category:Biological pigments and add the code Category:Pigments and any other relevant supercategories. Then you'll have to move whatever articles are appropriate to the new category. Melchoir 08:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Latin legal terminology

message: The discussion that was here has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (legal). Please continue discussion there.—msh210℠ 01:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: The title of this category is a little misleading.  These aren't phrases so much as terms.  Should we rename the category?  That would bring it in line with its parent category (:Category:Legal terms) as well.  Pygora123 05:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrases vs. Terms 

message: Please use  to mark up Latin words and phrases, thus: . Thank you. Andy Mabbett (aka Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy Mabbett; Andy Mabbett's contributions 09:30, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language mark=up
Talk:Cwmbran Brewery

message: This is the sort of page that should, when we set them up, be merged into a regional page on brewing. --Stlemur 04:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Multipotency

message: I'm suggesting we merge totipotency, pluripotency, multipotency, and unipotent cell. I can see a lot of information being repeated or off track in these pages in the future, e.g. whether or not cell differentiation is reversable or not. Something makes me think that this set of pages may belong with cellular differentiation, or perhaps in a (single) page of its own? Is there a name for this ("stem cell potency?") that we could use?
Otherwise, it wouldn't surprise me if all four pages remain a stub, and there isn't too much to say on each subject that doesn't also affect the other.
58.107.51.55 11:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, but they should all be better written. I'm working on it. Dr Aaron 10:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm also in disagreement, but I think that the content of the three articles should be edited to produce more similar style with better comparisons and contrasts.Trilobitealive (talk) 13:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging pages. 
Talk:Bajocian

message: I cleaned up the tables a bit.  Some things were obvious, but the meaning of the daggers was mysterious to me so I eliminated all of them.  I thought they might mean extinct, but there were none for the first table where the animals are obviously extinct.  If you do restore them, please explain what they mean. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Table clean up

message: Seems like the GSSP has been set at the Murtinheira section (http://www.diarioaveiro.pt/noticia/8365). I could not find an English source for the inauguration yet. --Tobias1984 (talk) 13:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murtinheira 
Talk:Neelam Kothari

message: Is the birthdate really 1968 as that would have made her 16 in her first film.
Please verify as I heard a rumour birthdate may be 1966.
http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report_neelam-kothari-and-samir-soni-get-candid-about-their-upcoming-wedding_1492601
Comeback mmmmmm   plz plz SUSANTA1596 (talk) 02:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Honda Tadakatsu

message: In the first paragraph, "Honda commanded a rank of musketeers as the combined Oda/Tokugawa forces annihilated Takeda Katsuyori's army, partly thanks to the skillful use of ranked muskets, firing in cycling volleys - the first example of this highly-effective tactic that the world had seen" does not make gramatical sense.  This article definitely needs proof reading.
I made an edit to that section now.Wingedregent 17:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gramatical errors. 

message: More or less this entire article is written without giving any sources whatsoever. The only two sources seem to be linked to some website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonridings (talk • contribs) 23:49, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:Yosef Haim Brenner

message: Did Brener write also poetry?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.28.98.141 (talk) 23:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Brener and poetry?
Talk:White House Fellows

message: I have proposed merging White House fellowship into this article. It would likely not be a true merge, as this article is decent (though short) while the other is, to be blunt, a mess. It may end up being deleted altogether, but I felt like calling for a merge in case there is anything to salvage, at which point we should redirect the "fellowship" article here. (I suppose we could use that article title also, though content-wise, this article is certainly the standard.) Any input into this proposal? --SuperNova |T|C| 05:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Has the programme been abandon?--109.91.72.35 (talk) 06:42, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fate? 

message: Any opposition to separating this list into two for former and current commissioners? It has changed significantly since first posted and does not include many of the current commissioners.
I'd also like to elevate this list to its own section instead of a subsection of * Notable Alumni *; any comments or disagreement? Doghouse09 (talk) 17:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separating list of former and current commissioners?
Talk:White House fellowship

message: I have proposed merging White House fellowship into White House Fellows. It would likely not be a true merge, as this article is, to be blunt, a mess; the other is much closer to what WP articles should be. This one may end up being deleted altogether, but I felt like calling for a merge in case there is anything to salvage, following which we should redirect this article to the other. (I suppose we could use the "fellowship" article title instead, though content-wise, the "Fellows" article is certainly the standard.) Any input into this proposal? --SuperNova |T|C| 05:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Robert Mosbacher Jr.

message: Someone has been deleting this info. I am pretty sure of its accuracy considering what all sources, and my personal memory, claim.
--Evan7257 05:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate in mayoral election
Talk:Pilar Montenegro

message: * It would be nice to get something on the current controversies: IE, her former husband selling revealing pictures to Penthouse, and the she said/she said situation with Noelia.
* I added some extra info, mainly on the albums. I would have included more on Noelia, but my Spanish is still pretty new (I'm able to understand about every third word) and I can't trust the translators to do the job for me. But from what I can tell, Pilar's ex is with Noelia now, I think as her manager, and was accused of beating her, something Pilar defended him over, though I believe this is the same guy who sold nude pictures of her to penthouse after their divorce. Correct me if I'm wrong. OriginalGuest 12:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Plano-convex

message: Deletion proposed, since Wikipedia:Naming conventions (adjectives) discourages articles on adjectives. The alternative would be to convert this to a disambiguation page that links to each type of plano-convex object. Really, any link most links to here should go to either wiktionary:plano-convex, or Lens (optics)#Types of lenses.--Srleffler 05:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But that discouragement is not absolute; sexagesimal, for example. The real objection here would be that this is a dicdef; and I think the sentence on Sumerian plano-convex bricks (which needs expansion badly) makes it more than that. I am taking out the  and will consider restructuring as a dab. Septentrionalis 14:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, as used in that article sexagesimal is a noun (whether or not this is correct English). For example, "Sexagesimal was not a pure base 60 system..." I'm not sure that the mudbrick line is enough to save this. It's not clear, for example, whether one would call these mudbricks plano-convexes, or plano-convex mudbricks. If the latter, then this article is not appropriate, per the naming convention on adjectives. I'll try converting to a disambig and see how that looks.--Srleffler 01:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: almost all may be a better example; but I like your dab page, even if I did fiddle with it. Septentrionalis 00:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that "almost all" is technically an adjective either, but I certainly agree with your point that there are clearly exceptions to the rule. I'm fine with unmasking the links. I normally do this on disambig pages too, but hesitated here because one of the links goes to a specific section. --Srleffler 05:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Title page

message: Some books have more than one page with the title on, often one with just the title, and another either more ornate or with the author, publisher etc. on it too. Are both of these title pages, or are the separate terms to distinguish between the two? --xensyriaT 08:54, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just found half title, and added it to the see also section. --xensyriaT 09:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple title pages 

message: Some books have something like a frontispiece for each chapter. Is there a name for that? An example is here for Perspectiva Corporum Regularium (1568). The first is for the book, the others are for chapters. A modern example is The Neverending Story (search "neverending story initials"). Greetings, Watchduck (quack) 15:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Title pages of chapters
Template talk:Infobox bodybuilder

message: Remind and check that everybody remembers to put kilograms or pounds on "weight", or perhaps use a magic template to kill two birds with one stone. Jidanni (talk) 20:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units for weight 

message: Way back when the world was young, before TemplateData and template documentation pages, User:Glen created this template with  as the name of the parameter for the "Active" data row, hoping for it to be self-documenting. (Actually, it was originally called , but was quickly extended to accept a year of retirement.)
In the decade and a half since that time, what's happened is that the details of the parameter name have been largely ignored, but the terrible name has stuck around. A quick, informal survey of the transclusions of this template showed that a few contain either "Yes" or "No" for the  value, more contain a "Retired YYYY" value, but many, many more follow other conventions. For example, a date range, "Since YYYY", or more complex details.
Many other articles contain no Active data at all, even for fairly well-covered subjects, which I have to think may come down to the editors of those pages having no idea how to fill in a parameter named  and just ignoring it.
So, in the spirit of WP:BOLD, I've added a parameter  to the infobox as the preferred alias for , though the legacy name is still accepted.  will take priority, though, and I've updated the documentation examples to reflect this fact, and to mention that  is now a legacy alias. -- FeRDNYC (talk) 02:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New parameter alias
Talk:Tautophrase

message: A neologism (by admission) only http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=Tautophrase+-wikipedia+-blog+-forum&meta= 17 ghits, if we exclude the words wikipedia blog and forum (65 if we don't). Doesn't pass the google test - did it get picked up anywhere else in the press ? One article doesn't make it notable. Megapixie 05:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was published in the New York Times. I first heard it on the radio. I think it's notable enough. Snottygobble 06:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Charles P. Cabell

message: while there is a reasonable accounting of positions held during military career, not much detail on some things of what exactly he did while in those, then, CIA section especially truncated (& for one of longest serving deputy directors!) some amount of detail & info from this far back not so so hard to get Ooma Huntress-Protectress (talk) 03:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm at AFHRA and I've pulled Cabell's files. I agree with your concern re: his status as one of the longest-serving DDCIA, given the fact his files show Dulles himself revealed to the White House that Cabell had declined a 4-star slot so he could remain at CIA. (Dulles then labored to pin Cabell a fourth star in spite of DOJ's objections because, well, that's CIA for ya.) I'll {be bold} in fleshing out his page and of course I'm always happy if somebody notices I need a minor course correction! Rob Rosenberger (talk) 02:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  more detail 

message: Please change to the proper photo. 2600:6C5A:4C7F:E0C7:6C4B:AD0F:7A04:296B (talk) 00:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is General Walker,not Cabell.