Talk:Beijing–Shanghai high-speed railway

message: http://www.ritchiewiki.com/wiki/index.php/Beijing-Shanghai_Express_Railway  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loop 9 (talk • contribs) 11:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the pointer.  As per , content on RitchieWiki is "free of copyright", so I've merged in the article. Jpatokal (talk) 02:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: "Jinghu" may be the Chinese name, but is this being used at all in English and what is this "chinese railway naming convention"?  Per WP:COMMON, I suspect Beijing-Shanghai is the right name.  See also eg. Beijing–Tianjin Intercity Railway, not "Jingtian". Jpatokal (talk) 11:16, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please join the discussion at Talk:Wuhan-Guangzhou High-Speed Railway. Python eggs (talk) 11:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The discussion concluded that "Wuhan-Guangzhou" is preferred over "Wuguang", so I have reverted the move.  However, this should be hammered out definitively at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Railway naming, please contribute to the discussion there. Jpatokal (talk) 01:38, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Jpatokal, Chinese naming follows the abbreviations for cities. some of these abbreviations are within the name, some are not. So it Beijing-Tianjin would be Jingjin (京津), never Jingtian (京天). --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 21:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming? 

message: Does anybody know whether there will also be slower trains, operating at 200 to 250 km/h, on the Beijing-Shanghai line?
I had understood, from press articles appearing approximately 14 April 2011 quoting the Ministry of Railways, that a class of slower trains would also be operated on the line, at different fares (and presumably lower fares, in response to complaints that the 300 km/h to 380 km/h trains were too expensive).  Does anyone know anything about this?  If there are such trains, then surely they would not use CRH380 rolling stock, which is overpowered for such service.  But the only CRH trains that I know of which are designed for 250 km/h or less are the CRH1 and CRH5 series, and I have heard no reports that those Bombardier-derived or Alstom-derived trains will operate on the Beijing - Shanghai high speed line.
*  Any information?
*  If anybody knows the answers to these questions, it would be helpful to incorporate them in the article.
Prospero10 (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Go and check any train schedule, they are all out there. Python eggs (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about slower 200 - 250 km/h trains?  Will there be two speed classes? 

message: I have moved the following content from the article proper since they appear to be tourist information. ANGCHENRUI WP:MSE♨ 12:54, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved unsuitable information from article page 

message: The speed change from 329 km/h to 300 km/h is mentioned in the WP:LEDE but not the article. More importantly no explaination is offered other then it came after the minister was fired. Was there some suggestion of safety issues or the cost too high or was no explaination offered (the sources are in Chinese). Also it says the original plan was for a nonstop service but according to a later part of the article the current service has one stop. Nil Einne (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed change 

message: The infobox says a 20% grade, highly unlikely for most rail service, and even more so for a high speed train.--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It didn't says 20%, but 20‰, please read carefully. Python eggs (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  20% grade? 

message: The speed with which the track was laid sounds very impressive.  Is this some sort of record?  Thanks, Wanderer57 (talk) 18:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction speed 

message: can anyone update the page with photos about how it looks like inside super fast trains that run on these High speed railway tracks?
Lokesh 2000 (talk) 08:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Photos 

message: An image used in this article, File:CRH380A test, 28 Sep 2010.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:CRH380A test, 28 Sep 2010.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: I was surprised to see no mention of the July crash that killed 40 people.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.112.106.155 (talk) 16:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is covered on the page for the Ningbo–Taizhou–Wenzhou Railway, which is where it happened. As well as, of course, on the main page, High-speed rail in China. -- Vmenkov (talk) 19:32, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't the crash included on this page? 

message: we should change the high speed rail transfers to china railways transfers and label both conventional and high speed rail line transfers. They can both be differentiated by a little CRH or china railways logo. like in the Taiwan High Speed Rail table  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve chiu (talk • contribs) 02:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conventional rail connections 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/beijing/
*:Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
*http://web.archive.org/web/20110607060136/http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/beijing/
*:Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Beijing–Shanghai High-Speed Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110618053739/http://www.ksup.gov.cn:80/content/content_view.aspx?id=164f38df-5275-4c46-819f-99a92da53877 to http://www.ksup.gov.cn/Content/Content_View.aspx?id=164F38DF-5275-4C46-819F-99A92DA53877
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: http://shanghaiist.com/2017/07/04/double-decker-sleepers.php
121.75.123.4 (talk) 00:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double-decker sleep car service added from 1 July 2017 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Beijing–Shanghai High-Speed Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422191017/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-04/18/content_8002074_3.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-04/18/content_8002074_3.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004175656/http://news.id.msn.com/lifestyle/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4985237 to http://news.id.msn.com/lifestyle/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4985237
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617035654/http://english.eastday.com/e/110614/u1a5941437.html to http://english.eastday.com/e/110614/u1a5941437.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110618011649/http://www.china-mor.gov.cn/xwzx/xwfb/201106/t20110614_24265.html to http://www.china-mor.gov.cn/xwzx/xwfb/201106/t20110614_24265.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:33, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion