Talk:Artgemeinschaft

message: We got plenty now :-)
: There are no citations in the article, and only one external reference. Please do not remove template messages without good reasons, and also please read the Wikipedia Manual of Style before editing here at Wikipedia. A basic understanding of the rules of a community often reduces the number of mistakes that are made in ignorance of those rules, which is something that you are likely to understand since you have an apparent interest in heathen reconstructionism.
: The message I left at your IP userpage is entirely appropriate. It is a template message that is used by many people at Wikipedia, particularly when anonymous editors are screwing up an article without apparently realising that they are doing so, and thereby encourages those people to educate themselves. One of the items covered by the rules is in leaving inappropriate messages at user Talk pages, which is something that you have also already done. 
: In sum- do not tell someone that they are acting inappropriately when you obviously do not understand the sets of rules being followed here at Wikipedia. It is mildly amusing to me, but it makes you look foolish. I  have very little interest in this article, so if you have something productive to discuss with me, use my talk page or e-mail address found at my user page. 
: P.MacUidhir (t) (c)  21:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: who made up this word? I note it is spread all over the internet, but it's not English! The proper English adjective relating to "supremacism"
::A shame, I know. Sometimes language doesn't evolve by the book. EH
::: Designed to deceive =/= "evolve".105.9.119.185 (talk) 00:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: "supremacist"

message: Dieter, you posted and then "withdrew" the following statement: (one more hooray for Wikipedia not letting people
manipulate the history after the fact)
I am familiar with the tounge-in-cheek "we cannot be Nazis, because we reject socialism", often heard from Neonazis. Nazism itself wasn't very "socialist" to begin with, and you do not have to subscribe to any tenets of Marxism in order to be a Neonazi. According to our Neonazi page, core tenets are "racial nationalism, antisemitism, and praise for Hitler". If any of this is lacking, we may talk about Neo-fascim then. dab (ᛏ) 10:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: what you are prepared to be ashamed of is of course your personal responsibility. You are free to be proud of anything you like. I have no particular interest in the AG. I summarized what I could find on the internet and do not claim first hand experience with them (unless this discussion counts as such). I ask you to let the mentioned sources stand as they are, while you are of course free to add additional testimonies. The AG is "counted as being close to the neo nazi movement" is the verdict of the sources discussed above. This doesn't directly allege that they are themselves neo nazis in any narrow sense. For this reason, I agree with the removal of the neo nazi categorization, as long as they continue to be categorized as "supremacist". Since you seem to agree with that, we have no dispute, and I would ask you not to vandalize my user page because you disagree with my views. dab (ᛏ) 15:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

text: that's fine, I think I've almost got over it and will stop whining about it any minute now. You can tell your friend that no amount of defecating on my talkpage will have any effect on this article; the most that will achieve is that I get annoyed or lose interest, but there are many other editors at Wikipedia who will take my place if necessary. dab (ᛏ) 14:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "discussion you didn't want to have" 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Artgemeinschaft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100719175400/http://www.im.nrw.de:80/sch/738.htm to http://www.im.nrw.de/sch/738.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090509193938/http://www.hamburg.de:80/contentblob/102176/data/brennpunkt-esoterik.pdf to http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/102176/data/brennpunkt-esoterik.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090509193938/http://www.hamburg.de:80/contentblob/102176/data/brennpunkt-esoterik.pdf to http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/102176/data/brennpunkt-esoterik.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified