lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:GrandPa's

message: I heard at the time that Forsyth Computers was sold for good money. Not "closed", as is stated in the article. As part of the terms of the sale,
its stores were subsequently operated under the acquiring company's name.
Sorry but at the moment I can't remember their name... Publius3 04:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You heard correctly. Davewho2 (talk) 02:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forsyth Computers 

message: To all employees that had worked at the Arnold Grandpas store. We would love for you all to attend a reunion on Nov. 1st at 12 pm. in the Park of Kimmswick. Which we will have Sign posted started on 61 67 turning onto hwy K going into Kimmswick. Bring A Dish and drinks of any kind. We have electric available for use and pinic tables. might want to bring lawn chair. and dont forgot your smiles see you there  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.237.227.24 (talk) 06:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grandpas Reuion
Talk:Stool guaiac test

message: I'll try to make an image of the slides and developer.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  04:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Have expanded article as requested.  However it might be more appropriate to subsume information on Guaiac testing in the article on Fecal occult blood which provides context about the more accurate testing currently recommended (while guaiac testing is no longer recommended, because it lacks the sensitivity of more modern screening methods).  
Ocdcntx (talk) 23:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be merged into larger article on [[Fecal occult blood]]? 

message: I am unable to alter the figure, but the naming of the educts in the first column is wrong. From top to bottom the molecules should be called furoguiacin, dimethylfuroguiacin, diethylfuroguiacin. Would be great if someone could correct. Thanks! 84.166.159.23 (talk) 23:43, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in chemical reaction figure, molecule names
Talk:Berrie

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 04:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Oregon Route 35

message: I'm surprised that pears are not mentioned in the "produce around Hood River" paragraph but apples and cherries are. As far as apples and cherries go, I don't know, but I do know I've never seen such a concentration of pear orchards as exist between Hood River and Parkdale!
This highway is currently out of service - should a mention of this be included in the article?  --70.218.101.168 04:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not, as hopefully the closure is temporary. Wikipedia articles supply basic information about a subject, and not necessarily up-to-the-minute news. If the road closure is notable, for instance if it continues for a long time, it might be included as history. That's what I think, anyway. Here's a link to a news story about the closure if anyone needs it: . Here's the ODOT page that currently mentions the closure and several others: . Katr67 04:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I take it back. It sounds like the road is going to be closed for a while and the washout is pretty serious. Anyway, they said so on this morning on OPB and that's good enough for me. Thanks for mentioning it! Katr67 15:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:High Power Electric Propulsion

message: Did NASA get the HiPEP thruster to work?
Andrew Swallow 04:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The GRC HiPEP webpage wasn't changed from 2005 to July 2020,Webarchive:HiPEP but now it has gone! - Rod57 (talk) 14:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GRC HiPEP webpage now gone
Talk:Mel Hein

message: Is it supposed to be rose or nose? --Nehrams2020 04:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: I've come across several pages for football players today that have copyright issues.  In each case, the existing text had been replaced with the text from the Hall of Fame's website.  Oddly, in each case Mel Hein, Dan Fortmann, and Cliff Battles, the violating change was made by a different user.  I will continue to look for other examples, but for now, I've reverted this (and the other two) back to the last clean version. Anson2995 20:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Issues

message: Mel Hein was ranked #96 on the NFL Channel's The Top 100 Greatest Players. (2010).Cjstanonis (talk) 23:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hein listed on NFL Top 100
Talk:Shaykh Tabarsi

message: Is the English name for this scholar "Tabarsi" or "Tabrisi"..?
Shaykh al-Tabarsi can also refer to: 
* Abu Mansoor Ahmad ibn Ali al-Tabarsi - author of al-Ihtijaj (~600 AH)
* Husayn ibn Muhammad Taqi al-Nuri al-Tabarsi - author of Mustadrak al-Wasa'il (1254/1838 - 1320/1902)
Toushiro (talk) 04:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Arabic spelling of his name, it is Tabarsi (الطبرسي). Xareen (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: English Name?

message: There are a number of famous Tabarsi in the Islamic history apart from the subject of this page → Abu Ali al-Fadl ibn al-Hasan al-Tabarasi [the author of the famous Tafsir Majma al Bayan]. 
I am providing a list of name of people who were named Tabarsi to avoid future confusions. 
- al-Hajj Mirza Husayn ibn Muhammad Taqi al-Nuri al-Tabarasi (d. 1320)
- Abu Mansoor Ahmad ibn Ali al-Tabarasi 
- Hasan ibn al Fadl ibn Hasan al-Tabarasi [the author of Mishkat al Anwar]. (also known as Ali al-Tabarasi hence his father's kunya in 'Abu Ali'). Xareen (talk) 18:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Other famous Tabarsi
Talk:SAFER barrier

message: The following references appeared in an article on a manufacturer of the barriers.  That article (North Industrial Machine) is currently nominated for deletion.  I'm adding the references here in case the article does get deleted.
1. http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/nascar/os-nascar-safer-barriers-upgrades-0705-20150704-story.html
2. http://www.nascar.com/content/nascar/en_us/news-media/articles/2015/7/4/isc-announces-plans-to-install-additional-safer-barriers-at-facilities.html
3. http://www.foxsports.com/nascar/story/daytona-international-speedway-international-speedway-corporation-safety-kyle-busch-070415
4. http://www.nimachine.net/
5. http://www.scnow.com/messenger/article_71a01bb8-fb1a-11e4-9205-afcd120cfe2c.html
6. http://www.thestate.com/sports/nascar-auto-racing/article34121448.html
NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References from another article
Talk:James Black (blacksmith)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Leonard Jenyns

message: Have added link to 1901 DNB article on Leonard (Jenyns) Blomefield. Plenty of material to use for the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: DNB article
Talk:Antonio Tamburini

message: According to the Linda di Chamonix page, Tamburini didn't create the role. almost-instinct 14:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Lucrezia Borgia (opera) page, Tamburini didn't create that role either! almost-instinct 10:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed them per Casaglia and Ashbrook. There may be other errors. Worth cross-cecking with those sources (now added to the article). Voceditenore (talk) 11:40, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

text: While I'm doing that I hope also to find useful stuff for the rather thin page on Domenico Cosselli - please might others do the same if they're in that neck of the woods? almost-instinct 13:32, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query
Talk:Cattewater Wreck

message: I edited this page to include a link to the associated National Heritage List for England (NHLE) record on behalf of Historic England who are responsible for the management of wrecks designated under the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973. The NHLE record includes further information related to the wreck.Phoebe MSDS (talk) 08:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits

message: I have edited the lead to include reference to the NHLE entry for this wreck. Phoebe MSDS (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: NHLE inclusion
Talk:Beldin

message: I don't know the series, so somebody else will have to make this call: is the :Category:Fictional dwarves tag correct, or should it be :Category:Fictional characters with dwarfism? --Paul A 04:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He isn't a dwarf.  Dwarfs don't exist in the Belgariad.  72.192.54.23 21:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Felix Kaufmann

message: Kaufmann wrote an English version of "Methodenlehre..." called "Methodology of the Social Sciences" OUP, New York 1944, which is apparently "a very different book", he having been in the meantime influenced by Dewey's "Logic, the Theory of Inquiry", as he tells us in the Preface.  
You would not know from this book that he was at all a lawyer.  The title page calls him "Professor of philosophy, the Graduate Faculty of The New School for Social Research" wherever that might be.  - Pepper 150.203.227.130 04:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Frank and Ernest

message: This article is about the Frank and Ernest comic strip, but this name also belongs to a long running religous programme called Frank and Ernest. So this article will be retitled Frank and Ernest (comic strip) and the other article will be titled Frank and Ernest (broadcast) and both will be sourced from a disambiguation page called Frank and Ernest. Fragilethreads 19:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Not only is this page confusing it looks nothing like a disam page.
I don't know how to make it look like one however...
Chitchin13 (talk) 22:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikify
Talk:The Return of Starbuck

message: I find it somewhat dubious that the vision allegedly sent to Ezekiel was, in fact, a crashing Cylon fighter.  Is there a source for this?
RamblerReb (talk) 03:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The Prophet Ezekiel
Talk:Billy Van

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 04:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: It says he was born in 1934, but it also says he was 68 years old when he died. I did the math, and he should be over 80 years old. What's going on? Rmaster1200 (talk) 10:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth error? 
Talk:Billy Ze Kick

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Bir Bakmışsın

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Vicky Brago-Mitchell

message: Good research!  I agree, I'm not Notable.  The publishing company was 祥文社--it no longer exists--and my surname at the time was 関根.
76.168.76.11 05:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I'd normally tag db-bio, but after a rewrite it survived the second AfD as no consensus....
There are no references, so technically, every line of the article could be deleted ... however a Google search does support much of the article, so I've simply added fact tags.  It this article is going to survive is should be totally re-written to highlight the notability and get rid of all the irrelevant bio information such as number of marriages ... that's not important
Brian 13:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible article
Talk:Linde–Buzo–Gray algorithm

message: What is the difference between LBG and K-means? Memming 05:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to , LBG is like the batch mode of K-means. Does K-means supposed to be online mode? Memming 15:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

text: LBG uses Lloyd's algorithm to refine the codebook after splitting each vector in the codebook in two. Holzklöppel (talk) 20:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

text: I assume they wanted to abbreviate "Generalized Lloyd Algorithm". Holzklöppel (talk) 20:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I rewrote the lede of the article to be what I (not a subject-matter expert) considered comprehensible and added a pseudocode description as per WP:ALGO. The article still needs more sources than the one I used to gain an understanding of the algorithm, details and general information is also missing. I am dissatisfied with the pseudocode and feel the algorithm would be better represented in prose, but MOS says pseudocode. Holzklöppel (talk) 08:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing, Content need improvement
Talk:Dr. No (film)

message: Would we be able to get the proceeding/preceding film at the bottom of the infobox for the entire series? I would do it myself but I can't remember my password, I also don't know how to do it, and am too lazy at 1AM to figure out how. 2001:8003:B195:5B00:759A:A629:6D3F:A546 (talk) 14:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Half the movies already include the proceeding/preceding film in the abstract, but it would be nice if we could include it in the infobox and standardise across the series. Just a QoL thing, really. 2001:8003:B195:5B00:759A:A629:6D3F:A546 (talk) 14:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proceeding/Preceding Film In The Infobox 

message: Should Nadine Dorries' Dr No be added to the legacy? 
* The Plot: The Political Assassination of Boris Johnson, HarperCollins Publishers. expected November 2023, ISBN 9780008623425
Htrowsle (talk) 22:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:Many-horned adder

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Bitis rhinoceros

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: B. g. rhinoceros has always been much more popular in zoos around the world than B. g. gabonica, and all because of a little pair of raised internasal scales. Consequently, it looks like we're always going to have many more images of this subspecies than of the nominate. It would be nice if we had more text for this page so that we could place more of our images here without making it look too image-heavy, but I just don't have that much information that is specific to this subspecies. On the other hand, we could always use some more images of B. g. gabonica (the nominate subspecies) for the Bitis gabonica article. --Jwinius (talk) 23:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Popularity
Talk:Michael Taylor (screenwriter)

message: While creating the article, some of the data was gathered from memory-alpha.org and en.battlestarwiki.org.
-Mardus 05:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roaring Forties

message: If the red links are being put in like that - is there any point if you havent actually started the articles? SatuSuro 13:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This question solved on another talk page - will probably start stubs on both before new year, hopefully.... SatuSuro 14:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: When reverting something you need to either explain in your edit summary or on the talk page SatuSuro 06:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncommented reversion

message: Since wind speed is the issue here, some mention of wind speed would be informative.
74.60.161.158 (talk) 21:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. 79.66.204.76 (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Wind speed?

message: "The Roaring Forties" was also a term referring to an upper-class neighborhood in NYC, possibly the 40th street area.
Its use in this 1920's newspaper clipping indicates that meaning would have been widely known and understood.
posing-regretted-by-louise-brooks
A separate article for that usage would be appropriate.
--23.119.205.88 (talk) 13:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different meaning of term
Talk:Tropical Storm Barry (1995)

message: In general, it's pretty good, but the storm history drags on a bit and should be shortened. There needs to be some more outside of the storm history. The NHC has some local reports that should provide info once the site is back up. Just curious, how many tropical cyclones have made landfall on Nova Scotia in the month of July? If Barry is the only one, or one of only a few, that should be mentioned. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is that information available? Link? CrazyC83 04:19, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: There is not much more here other than rainfall and wind data in Atlantic Canada. Even with that, it can only go so far. There was no real damage or impact, like houses and buildings damaged/destroyed, or fatalities. It can easily be condensed and will fit into the main article, the 1995 Atlantic hurricane season. Additionally, the article is not GA or FA, so it wouldn't be of any loss if it was merged. For those reasons, I propose that we merge with article into the 1995 AHS.--12george1 (talk) 17:04, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to see it condensed first before it be merged. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  17:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I support a merge now. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  17:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Sewart Air Force Base

message: This page should really be merged with Smyrna Airport. Thunderbunny (talk) 05:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just split it off from Smyrna Airport.  Sewart AFB had quite a different purpose than Smyrna Airport does.   The military article should be seperate from the civilian airport. Bwmoll3 (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Considering that at this point there is significantly more content to the AFB article than the actual Smyrna airport article, having them split is entirely appropriate.  They are, for all intents and purposes, two entirely separate entities occupying different points in time. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 22:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: The C-7A Caribou was another Training unit at Sewart AFB during the later years of Viet Nam war. I was there in Spring 1969 for Aircrew training. 
One historical reference (search "C7 Caribou" or "Sewart") at URL https://books.google.com/books?id=oJ6wvqUMWkUC&pg=PT164&lpg=PT164&dq=c7-a+at+sewart+afb+tn&source=bl&ots=uGRLKtkud1&sig=ACfU3U3lDhU7sdpkGamM3c0dxO4nYG1fMQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwimtoOx-M7nAhUFUKwKHS72D0IQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=c7-a%20at%20sewart%20afb%20tn&f=false
Another URL: http://sammcgowan.com/c7.html
Units: 4442th CCTW (Combat Crew Training Wing)/4449th CCTS (Combat Crew Training Squadron)
KenMascaro-SoftwareWizard 22:32, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  C7-A Training missing from Sewart history
Talk:Tamarin (software)

message: I removed the link to the disambiguation page because I thought it was unlikely someone would find themselves on "Tamarin (JIT)" while looking for information on monkeys.  My change was reverted.  Why do you think there should be a link to the disambiguation page?
:Because it is general practice which doesn't hurt the page, and I don't think it all that unlikely. --Gwern  (contribs) 16:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that a disambiguation link isn't needed here. The only way somebody would end up at "Tamarin (JIT)" while trying to get to "Tamarin" is if they did a search for "Tamarin" and randomly chose a result halfway down the page. Gwern claims this is general practice, but I don't recall seeing any other articles named "foo (bar)" with a link to "foo (disambiguation)" unless the page for "foo" automatically redirected to "foo (bar)". Do you have any examples? This really is a minor issue though, and not worth getting into an edit war over. Herorev 17:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If two people disagree with me, fine - I'll go with the majority here. As you said it is not all that serious. --Gwern  (contribs) 18:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation