lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Snake Pit

message: the snake pit (1948) is one of the best pictures to date. very few flims to date can compare to this flim.--68.230.125.119 06:36, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link for actress Helen Craig actually goes to a page for a different person, and author, with the same name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreascg (talk • contribs) 22:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  correction to Film Credits section 

message: Immersion in ice water. Supposed to increase blood circulation in the brain, to treat depression. Used in this movie, and 'Cuckoo's Nest'. Hyropathy / hydrotherapy is asserted in this article, but I cannot read the source, and I challenge that this use is Way Wrong. There is no WP article for hydroshock! Sadsaque (talk) 04:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydroshock
Talk:Millennium Falcon

message: As verified at timecode 1:10, 1:29, 1:35, 1:45 and 1:49 of the official trailer , in this film the Falcon has a very different front end to how it is depicted elsewhere. Presumably later changes can be attributed to damage in the film and how it was later repaired, and this info needs to be included. -Chumchum7 (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depiction in ''Solo'' 

message: Answer The question I’m so confused 
I half see a new Hope
Help me WikiIWILLSHERCH20 (talk) 21:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What did they mean when Luke called it A peace of Junk?
Talk:California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt

message: This claim is unsourced. I find this claim strange, since Humboldt was a regional name long before the school was founded. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 16:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named after von Humboldt? 

message: This article needs a section - even if just a paragraph or two - on the Intifada Hall and East Nelson Hall occupation. Amyipdev (talk) 20:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it.  We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in the sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse.   ElKevbo (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the Intifada Hall occupation
Talk:Honor system virus

message: Didn't Scott Adams feature an Honor System Virus in one of his "Dilbert" panels? --Wesley R. Elsberry 19:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I seem to recall something about a "User-Friendly virus" from Sally Forth as well. -- Lenoxus 23:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pop Culture
Talk:Robert Quine

message: He's much better known as Robert Quine, not Bob Quine. I suggest this page be moved to Robert Quine and Bob Quine made a redirect. - David Gerard 09:41, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No-one's commented in over a week; I'll assume there are no objections. Moving - David Gerard 14:41, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, when I've asked someone to remove the old redirect for me ... - David Gerard 14:46, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Night of Decadence

message: The topic of this article is of dubious notability and has a variety of other issues. I've tagged the article with the relevant template messages. Please address these or it will nominated for deletion a month from now. Madcoverboy (talk) 17:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD in 1 month

message: Well, I think the decorations for this year's NOD just ruined half my childhood... --BBM (talk) 00:56, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Wonderful World of NOD
Talk:The Magic Door

message: Unsourced; no evidence of notability; could easily be summarized in the article for the 'original' series The Magic Door --Another Believer (Talk) 04:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 09:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Beyond the Magic Door]] into [[The Magic Door]]
Talk:Edward Sutton, 2nd Baron Dudley

message: The article stated that Sutton was a MP from 1492 to 1529, but does not state for where. However, he does not have an entry in the 1509-1554 volume of the History of Parliament, either under "Dudley" or "Sutton" (although his half-brother does).
Looking at the dates, I think if he succeeded John Sutton, 1st Baron Dudley, his grandfather, he must have held a barony from 1487 onwards - so presumably he attended Parliament as a baron in the House of Lords, not an MP in the Commons? I've removed the refs to him being an MP. Andrew Gray (talk) 10:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parliament?
Talk:List of ornithologists

message: This would be better as a category, wouldn't it? We need a "robot" to do such conversions! Andy Mabbett 11:36, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. "Ornithologist" should be a category not a list. I've just added Ian Newton, of all people, to this list ffs. Whatthe he may be the most respected ornithologist in the world (2014), and he wasn't in it? ... Narky Blert (talk) 03:54, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Uyghur language

message: The section "Examples" is rather useless. The texts are very long, without any annotation, explanation or translation. The spelling used has never been used in Xinjiang or the countries of the former Soviet Union and some characters are missing. Babelfisch June 14th, 2004
: Agreed. Some anon added them. It's pointless. --Menchi 13:03, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples
Talk:Boynton v. Virginia

message: I've moved the text of the decision from this old version of the article, to Wikisource:Boynton v. Virginia. - dcljr 08:49, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decision now at Wikisource 

message: This article was recently just a small blurb on why Boynton was an important decision, but did not provide any of the factual or procedural backgroud.  It seems to shortchange the role of Boynton himself in challenging segregation, and also does not give enough details (in my opinion) on the people and processes that advanced his case from Police Court to the U.S. Supreme Court. KevinCuddeback (talk) 22:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more detail on Bruce Boynton's trip, Virginia State Courts, and Federal Appeals 

message: As of this writing, this article seems to, in the middle of nowhere, have cut off the rest of the story, including the finding of the court. Could someone who knows how, just finish it? (I don't.) Thanks. 76.236.220.28 (talk) 04:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  And then what?
Talk:Consumer privacy

message: This article needs alot of work, not just in the writing but in the content. References to biometrics are biased and shallow -- sure there are threats from biometrics but that is less than half the story (biometrics can presevre privacy better than anything else, if used properly).
The references to political climate (apparently in the US? ) are non-specific and won't stand a test of time at all. 
Lots of work needed. I'll start, but it would be good if everyone could start improving this one incrementally.
It is definitely necessary to add more inline citations and to only report facts (no addition of personal opinions).Cookiestan (talk) 05:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Biometrics can presevre privacy

message: I rated this article high priority for the Business & Econ project because it's a hot topic and should be covered in a balanced way.  I don't consider this article to be neutral. Maybe adding references will help, but there's also some good information in data privacy and expectation of privacy that would help balance this article. -- SueHay 23:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hot topic 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jessssy (talk) 03:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu
Talk:Type 82 destroyer

message: This article says that the Bristol had 40 Sea Darts. That can't be correct. All the Type 42 DDG had 22 missiles, including the Batch three ships. An acquaintance who served in the RN told me Bristol had 22 also. The largest installations were on the Invincible class with 36 rounds. --Two way time (talk) 00:46, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: GWS 30 "Sea Dart" magazine size

message: Type 82 destroyer should be merged into HMS Bristol (D23)
For the discussion, see Talk:HMS Bristol (D23) --184.144.163.181 (talk) 07:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In case it wasn't clear above, an editor has opened up a discussion about whether this page should be merged with HMS Bristol (D23). The discussion can be found here. All editors opinions welcome in the discussion. Thanks Woody (talk) 11:53, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Type 82 destroyer]] into [[HMS Bristol (D23)]]
Talk:Aorist

message: I seriously struggle with getting around the following sentence:
"Proto-Indo-European had a three-way aspectual opposition, traditionally called "present", "aorist", and "perfect", which are thought to have been, respectively, imperfective, perfective, and stative (resultant state) aspects."
I think it is unclear, and arguable. Even though it is unclear what the statement really says, I find it generally unsettling when someone states something truth-tentative about a hypothetical language. I find it also highly arguable to cathegorise aorist as a grammatical aspect alltogether. Would it not rather be more correct to state that the present and perfect, imperfective and stative are aspects of the aorist, which is per definition without aspect? --Xactnorge (talk) 19:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh, the aorist is, as far as I am aware, perfective, so it has an aspect. What leads you to say it does not have aspect? — Eru·tuon 20:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Please clarify the "three-way aspectual opposition"!

message: I think the source should be added in the chapter about aorist in south slavic languages. Was it really ever part of the Slovenian language? Aorista (talk) 19:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aorist in Slovenian language 

message: Domuz eti yermisiniz? to the second person unambiguously is an offer. To inquire habit or objection, we say Domuz eti yiyormusunuz? Sigara içiyormusunuz? Dmermerci~enwiki (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aorist in Turkish
Talk:Irvine High School

message: From VfD:
*This a substub about yet another high school with a title that no one would possibly think to look up. - Lucky 6.9 05:52, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: David Winterhalter, one of the school's first yearbook photographers, has posted a mass of photos from 1975 through 1980 on Facebook. The group contains images viewable to the public: Irvine High-The First Four Years. FYI... Binksternet (talk) 17:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Specifically, some of the images are newspaper scans which could be used as references. Binksternet (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Facebook group
Talk:Irvine Unified School District

message: *This a highly POV stub that really says nothing about the subject in question.  The content could potentially apply to any district.  Plus, how notable can a school district be?  My wife's worked for one for fourteen years.  It's a great gig, but the district itself simply isn't notable IMO. - Lucky 6.9 05:52, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: ''From VfD:''

message: *http://iusd.org/schools/maps/documents/2011-2012ES_attendancemap.pdf
*http://iusd.org/schools/maps/documents/Future2012-2013ES_attendancemap.pdf
*http://iusd.org/schools/maps/documents/2011-2012MS_attendancemap.pdf
*http://iusd.org/schools/maps/documents/2011-2012HS_attendancemap.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps
Talk:P-Funk

message: Duplicate entry to another fuller entry.
Better spelling for main article to be moved here from P funk.
This page needs to be wikified. And factualized. And POVified. Or at least a good part of that.  El Chupanibre
Are there really no synonyms for the term "key disciple"?
power to P funk
::I agree, hopefully tagging the article with Clean Up will attract some attention. Waqcku 23:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Decade-old merge proposal

message: This article is a total disaster.  P-Funk is the name of the band led for many years by George Clinton.  It's not that complicated, really (aside from the fact that, for contractual reasons, they released most of their albums as "Parliament" or "Funkadelic" and they spawned a myriad of spinoffs, side projects, etc.) Timothy Horrigan (talk)
:Parliament-Funkadelic was actually called p-funk? That's news to me, and probably very many other people. Cite?
:As a music style, I don't think p-funk should be capitalised. Also, it needs to be made clear that it is a style of music that is performed by people outside of George Clinton and his crew. -- Centrepull (talk) 09:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, P-Funk is an abbreviation for Parliament-Funkadelic, like Led Zep is to Led Zeppelin.  Morganfitzp (talk) 18:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose merge. Reading around the pages it seems that there is a consist use of p-funk for the style and Psychedelic funk for the group. That there is more than one group that has the same style can be seen by looking at :Category:P-Funk groups. As the style is not synonymous with the group, they should be kept separate. There are also number objections to a range of such merge proposals over the last decade over at Talk:Parliament-Funkadelic. Klbrain (talk) 23:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Don't Even Know Where to Begin
Talk:Steel (comics)

message: I feel John Henry Irons should receive his own, separate page. Steel I and Steel II could be featured under the Commander Steel page.
:I feel like that their presence in the article is so minor, it's practically a disambig section.  Might as well keep them. --Rocketgoat 07:22, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge/Split/Disambig?

message: Wasn't Amertek the company Steel used to work for that tried to kill him? I thought his current facility was called Steelworks. Daibhid C 21:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Company name
Talk:Eurogame/move

message: :Below is an archive of the debate of a move request.  The result was no consensus. Please do not modify the contents of the debate.  Thank you. Mangojuicetalk 15:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Support. This is the term I use when I need to be clear. I also use simply "Euro" short for possibly European-style board game?--Sonjaaa 14:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Option 1: Keep as [[German-style board game]] 

message: Support --pronoblem 19:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Option 2: Move to [[Designer game]] (or [[Designer board game]])
Talk:Frank Lloyd Wright

message: While their marriage is recorded in the infobox, the only mention of events regarding Tobin are to say she did not grant Wright a divorce at first but later did. When/where they were married, the surrounding circumstances, etc. are not mentioned. Also, the article calls Catherine Tobin "Kitty" before making a connection between the two names. Quirk4 (talk) 03:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Wright marry Catherine Tobin? 

message: I don't know I just got into architecture and I love that house and I saw it missing when researching wright  ChristopherLong22 (talk) 04:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: it is in the buildings section near the bottom of the page Dktrfz (talk) 01:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the Frank Lloyd wright page, I think the Pope-Leighey house is missing 

message: Category says American Christian pacfists, but the article says nothing about this.  Sources say he was a ratonalist humanist in the Unitarian tradition, while others describe him as a pantheist or even an atheist.  It isn't all that clear which is true. Viriditas (talk) 08:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American Christian pacisfists
Talk:Ludwig von Mises

message: I request that we make this page semi-protected, as a user keeps doing the exact change, while we try to undo it. BasedMises (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Requests for page protection go to WP:RFPP ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 

message: Hi! I am in a bit of a quarrel with a fellow user over the state of the fascism section- he keeps adding original research and is not following N-POV, but I would like the opinions of others.
F. A. Hayek 23:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: How come he was an advisor to Dolfuss then? 46.239.116.153 (talk) 10:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since when advising means sharing views on economics of person you are advising? John Mallows (talk) 11:32, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debates on Mises's Fascism: Yay or Nay
Talk:Simon Cumbers

message: I hope this article is NPOV. Simon was a friend of mine. I can be more POV here. I just hope those bastards responsible for Simon's murder rot in hell for what they did. Scumbags like that are beneath contempt. I'll stop writing before I start using obscenities to describe the Al Quada bastards more bluntly.  FearÉIREANN 16:31, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where did this come from?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.99.172 (talk) 17:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MI6?
Talk:The Exorcist

message: The current plot summary describe Regan claiming to "be Pazuzu, a manifestation of the Devil Himself" but in reality, Pazuzu is never mentioned by name until the sequel. Instead, Regan simply shouts "AND I'M THE DEVIL! NOW KINDLY UNDO THESE STRAPS!"
If reference to Pazuzu is necessary in the plot summary itself, perhaps we could make reference to the Pazuzu statues in Iraq that also appear later on during the exorcism scene. 119.18.0.214 (talk) 09:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose this might be because Blatty himself had specified that the possessing demon was Pazuzu in the book but, you're right, that name is unmentioned in the film (Blatty was rather annoyed that everyone commenting on the film thought it was the Devil; that may be how it got there. Daniel Case (talk) 06:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slightly error in the plot summary 

message: Abbythecat (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As I told you on my talk page, this is fanon at best without any indication that the creators clearly meant for the death date on the tombstone in Exorcist III (based on a novel that was not written as a direct sequel) to be a retcon putting the events of the first movie two years later than its release date rather than, say, a mistake made by the production designer. I will be removing it from the article; as I said it's better just to leave any claimed year of the movie's plot out of the synopsis. Daniel Case (talk) 06:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1975 

message: Is horror movie ko Hindi me banana chahiye tha😑 117.233.79.254 (talk) 06:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The horror movie is bases on real story
Talk:Borel–Weil–Bott theorem

message: I seem to have failed with the TeX at the end. Charles Matthews 18:28, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: I propose to move this page to Borel-Weil-Bott theorem. This is the more common name (google scholar returned 521 hits versus 37 for the "Borel-Bott-Weil theorem"), and also follows standard mathematical theorem naming convention in that it is an extension by Bott of a theorem of Borel and Weil. RobHar (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, and fixed double redirects. RobHar (talk) 17:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose Move to Borel-Weil-Bott theorem 

message: There's a serious typo in this article, namely the definition of "dominant." A weight   \mu   is dominant iff  (\mu, \alpha) \geq 0  for all simple roots \alpha; but in the article it states that a weight \mu is dominant iff (\mu, \alpha) \gg 0 for all simple \alpha, which is false. It makes sense how this typo occurred, though, since it IS true that for the theorem one wants to choose w such that (w(\lambda + \rho), \alpha) > 0. However, this is NOT the same as w(\lambda + \rho) being dominant; it's the same as w*\lambda being dominant, where w* denotes the "twisted" Weyl group action centered at \rho. This is a common error when discussing this theorem; personally, I think it's better exposition to define the twisted action and then say "let w be the unique element of the Weyl group such that w*\lambda is dominant," since this is almost always how this theorem is stated in practice. Also, one should avoid using \gg at all here.
I think also something that's implicit in this article should be made explicit: This theorem is valid only for algebraic groups or Lie groups over the complex numbers. It is worth emphasizing this because in the theory of algebraic groups one also considers algebraic groups over fields of positive characteristic, and a strictly weaker form of this theorem holds there. In particular, this theorem is false in its full generality there, but in fact it is still a huge open problem in representation theory to determine exactly what does hold.
Since this is my first edit on Wikipedia, I've erred on the side of being cautious and not actually making any of these changes myself. Should I just go ahead and make them? FrobeniusTwist (talk) 16:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly sounds like you know what you're talking about (and what your saying is true), so I would indeed encourage you to make the appropriate changes. Welcome to wikipedia! RobHar (talk) 16:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious Typo 

message: There is no rational reason to have separate articles. I will do it when I get enough time. Arcfrk (talk) 21:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest merge Borel–Weil theorem into this article, but maybe I'm just crazy. RobHar (talk) 15:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Borel–Weil theorem]]
Talk:Nysa, Poland

message: Text slightly modified from www.thomasgraz.net/glas.htm Thomas's Glassware Tour to Central Europe (own site!) -- thomasgraz 18:29, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: Hi Wikipedians, 
I'm a new member of the german Wikipedia community and want to improve and correct some articles about Nysa, Poland, Paczkow (germ. Patschkau), Poland and other villages and towns in Silesia.
I'm going to add some pictures to the WK Commons. I express my hope of being a suitable member of the wiki community and a partner going to help everybody in the following subjects: German language and literature, Geography and History of Germany.
--Didi43 (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm going to improve the lemma "Nysa, Poland" 

message: The page should inform about the Counter-Reformation/Barocco period.Xx236 (talk) 08:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Counter-Reformation]] 
Talk:Oława

message: Text slightly modified from www.thomasgraz.net/glas.htm Thomas's Glassware Tour to Central Europe (own site!) -- thomasgraz 18:29, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Both the articles are currently stubs. A separate article for the flag does not seem necessary yet. Furthermore, the flag does not appear notable on its own. Happy Squirrel (talk) 17:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Flag of Oława]]