lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:István Tisza

message: Almost all of this is written in a POV tone and also has claims that need to be verified. Luc Pepin`
:Sorry, I don't see anything much POV, so in the absence of any specific problems being mentioned, I've removed the tag.  It is, however, unsourced, so I've added a tag requesting references.  Binabik80 06:15, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I came to this article for information. I left this article with very little information. It also needs a thorough copy edit. Dr. Dan (talk) 02:09, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What were you looking for? Abdulka (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information 

message: This is probably not an appropriate use of the talk page, but I'm so happy I found this page because it confirms the story my grandfather told me about my great-grandfather, Gyula. I wish it had a reference so I could learn more. 
Hkovacs 08:45, 7 June 2012
: Really? Then you could help me. For example your great-grandfather's date of death is uncertain. --Norden1990 (talk) 10:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Article about your ancestor in the Hungarian Wikipedia: here --Norden1990 (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gyula Kovács
Talk:Pierre Balmain

message: It is mentionned, that Karl Lagerfeld is an Austrian, but indeed I think he is German.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.109.34.90 (talk) 20:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karl Lagerfeld is German 
Talk:RDM (lighting)

message: (11.18.2005)
My name is Anthony Headley and I live in Mississauga Ontario but am currently working in Monfalcone Italy for the next 2 years. I work as a touring technician, lighting technician, crew chief and site supervisor for companies like PRG in Toronto and TGA in LA I spend a lot of time away from home so dabbling in things like this keep me busy.
How can i remote a device using mobile phone? Qwer098123 (talk) 12:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: About me

message: Any reason the NOEDITSECTION is enabled. I'm assuming given it's placement it was designed to stop people editing the disclaimer, however it applies page wide, is bypassable by using the edit button/mangling the URL so I don't really see what purpose it serves. If no one objects I wouldn't mind it being edited out/turned off.
--Peternewman (talk) 00:56, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOEDITSECTION - Can we turn it off and enable section editing again?
Talk:Lord Kitchener (calypsonian)

message: the text of this article is word by word identical with this one here: http://tripatlas.com/Lord_Kitchener_(calypsonian)
how come? Panmaker (talk) 08:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See the bottom of that page. It says, "This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source." James Fryer (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: content of article

message: Is this article about Kitch or about Errol Peru? A friend of Peru seems to be adding content that is not really relevant. James Fryer 08:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errol Peru 

message: as the grandson of Marjorie, i only know of one (i.e her). however, i agree with you. if you want to add information about the rest of Kitch's wives, go ahead. i just wanted my family to have a few words in there!
:In today's Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Bio of the Day (Kitch), his first wife is identified as "Elsie" Lines - perhaps a nickname?  I'll add other personal stuff with a ref. --Seduisant (talk) 18:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Dr. Kitch is his best-known outside Trinidad. I remember a friend had it as a 45 rpm single, with Come Along Meh Boy as the b-side. Ben-w 08:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wives 

message: It seems to me that in order to better match the other musician articles, the name of this article should be changed to Lord Kitchener (musician), but I will wait to see if there is a consensus for this before moving it. --GentlemanGhost (converse) 19:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: He was best known as a calypsonian, and there is Atilla the Hun (calypsonian), so I prefer things the way they are. James Fryer (talk) 20:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature
Talk:Space Carrier Blue Noah

message: WIll be translating the rest of the Japanese over the next few days as I have time. --nihon 19:41, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! --WEKS 21:49, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese information

message: The article Space Battleship Yamato: Resurrection links here. Are the two stories connected or is this simply a mistake due to the ship's name? --MikeZ (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yamato 

message: Is it ok to have a fansite in the Link section? It looks like self-advertising to me. _DaftRose (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fansite
Talk:ESADE

message: I've re-focused this article on the college itself, since spin-off articles exist for its departments. Information specific to its departments (e.g., ESADE Business School) should go in the spin-off articles. Cheers —Eustress talk 17:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Focus
Talk:Federal judge

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 20:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations

message: This article currently begins as follows: Federal judges are judges appointed by a federal level of government as opposed to the state/provincial/local level. That makes no sense as applied to the present-day courts of Canada. The Court of King's Bench of the province of Manitoba was brought into existence by an act of the legislative assembly of Manitoba, but its judges are federally appointed, and they are NOT part of Canada's Federal Court.
The meaning of the term federal judge varies from one jurisdiction to another, and the introductory sentence of this article should be written in a way that accomodates that fact. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is incorrect as it applies to Canada
Talk:Slimehead

message: I think this page should be moved to "roughy" instead of Slimehead. It has virtually one THOUSAND times the google hits and is obviously the favoured term both in science and common language. -- Unsigned comment by Deglr6328, 20:20, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For the sake of uniformity, Wikipedia's fish family articles use the common name given by FishBase (and by extension, Nelson's Fishes of the World). A quick glance at the trachichthyid species and their common names shows that of the species with official, common names, three are called "roughy" and four "slimehead" (and a fifth "slimey head"). The only reason "roughy" gets more hits via Google is because most of the listed sites refer to the orange roughy in particular; it's the most economically important species. The "favoured term" for a scientist would in fact be trachichthyid—but Wikipedia is written with the layman in mind. Of course, for those people searching for "roughy," a redirect will take them here anyway. No need for a move, IMO. -- Hadal 02:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I believe "roughy" is one of those "marketing names" a la "Chilean sea bass" or "kiwifruit". FishBase is not infallible, some of their common name choices are not easily explained. I notice that even when all references to orange roughies are filtered out, "roughy" is still showing a up lot more than "slimehead". So I'd support a move, even though "slimehead" is more fun. :-) Stan 03:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Roughy vs. Slimehead
Talk:Kootenai National Forest

message: Unless it's a typo on USGS maps, the Purcell Mountains on the US side of the border are labelled the "Percell Mountains".  I'm a Canuck so I won't edit this page; better a Montanan or an Idahoan who knows what locals use would be better maybe.Skookum1 16:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purcell vs Percell
Talk:Lewis and Clark National Forest

message: What resources are in this forest, and how are they used?  24.167.174.213 23:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bighorn National Forest

message: The third and fourth sentences in the "Ecology and recreation" heading lack references, and conflict with each other. Please help with finding a reliable source(s) to resolve and make this entry accurate. DWKnuth (talk) 21:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting, unreferenced statements
Talk:Emo, Ontario

message: Thriving tourism industry?
--Picard102 20:32, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

message: "Emo, Ontario is often referenced in jokes comparing Emo, the town, to "Emo music and culture" . One joke asks whether the grass in Emo cuts itself."
Although I can't help but find it a bit humourous, the last line of this article doesn't sound very encyclopedic. Does it really belong in this article?--174.88.109.92 (talk) 00:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's original research, so no.vıdıoman 03:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've removed it. --66.18.233.247 (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this really belong here?

message: Just notifying that I have merged relevant content from the Orphan article Emo Walleye Classic into this article. As this is the only article that linked to it, and it occurs in this town, this seemed the logical place to merge it. (Permalink here.)
The Emo Walleye Classic article had been tagged for Notability since April 2009, and after almost no changes since its creation, and a Google search that basically only turned up links back to the tournament homepage and it's Facebook and Twitter pages, not to reliable secondary sources, I'm not convinced of its notability. If this changes in the future and the tournament becomes significant enough to justify having its own page with substantial reliable secondary sources, then someone can go back to the redirect and spin-off a new article again. --jjron (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article content merge
Talk:List of European Union directives

message: The official EU search engine is good - but runs the risk of descending into jargon. The Wikipedia article can contribute most by giving users a clear overview of EU legislation that then points towards the detail. The official search engine covers 20 areas (below). The Wikipedia article only 8. It would be good to use the EU framework but offer the reader an intelligent route through.
--Ian Yorston 14:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content / Framework =

message: Do you have anything for the EU's directives on using VDUs?
I was looking specifically for this, but you haven't got it. Was I wrong about that existing?
Monkey Chief 14:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: VDUs

message: The two pages for these items seem to be clear in differentiating a Directive from a Regulation.
However, both pages link to a list of European Directives - which tends to break down the differentiation. There appears to be no link to a list of European Regulations. Is there one that I have missed somewhere?
The HSE web site lists REACh as a Regulation, not a Directive, so this item appears to be incorrectly listed.
I actually think that a single list of all items that identifies which items are Directives and which are Regulations would be more useful than two separate lists.
StandardsWallah 05 Aug 2009 Standardswallah (talk • contribs) 13:45, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, REACH does not belong in a list of directives. I would just remove it. I'm not really sure of the reason for this list. If we wanted a list of all regulations and directives it would be rather long (several thousand?). The actual articles could be found via the categories. I suppose the main point is to classify the directives by subject area (which could also be done using categories). --Boson (talk) 19:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DIRECTIVES or REGULATIONS? 

message: If these were listed by year I would know where 98/83/EC slotted in Tom Pippens (talk • contribs) 10:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Old directive have their year in two digits. This means that 98 means 1998.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.136.216.31 (talk) 13:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Listing by Year

message: Directive 1999/44/EC http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31999L0044:EN:HTML because I couldn't tell if it is. MIVP - Allow us to be of assistance to you. (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 14:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this one here? 

message: In what sense is this list "ordered by theme to follow EU law"? It is difficult to see what logic applies to the themes/sub-headings and the order in which they are listed. There is a lot of material in the section headed "Other" which could probably be organised more logically but if there is some framework for "ordering by theme to follow EU law", as stated in the lead, it would be good to know what that framework is. BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of themes
Talk:Ring

message: *First, all ambiguous terms should be things/wiki-pages that would be confused with the word/wiki-page ring, not a list of all types of rings. For example, 'ring' is not ambiguous with 'onion ring'.Jethero 21:11, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: TODO

message: In this sports, the word "ring" seems to have a special meaning. Please note that I'm European and I have not the slightest idea of what a "ring" is (nor can I claim I know at least the basic rules of Baseball), but I often read it like 26 rings in sports reports. Can anyone enlighten me please? -andy 80.129.90.199 12:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ring(s) (Baseball) 

message: In discussions of GPU computing, they talk about "supporting multiple compute rings"  From the context, it sounds like some sort of task priority management capability to replace the FIFO processing that GPUs currently do, but I'm guessing. It's not any of the types of "ring" mentioned on this page.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAwNzg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.134.11 (talk) 17:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ring(s) (other)
Talk:Miasma (album)

message: I removed the link to the A Vulgar Picture article since that now just redirects back to this article. It seems like there is room in this article to include a section about the "A Vulgar Picture" single, and any associated information, rather than a unique article for "A Vulgar Picture".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.151.79.169 (talk) 21:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Vulgar Picture link 
Talk:Megatrain

message: That only shows the East Midlands Trains fleet, what about the SWT network? The SWT network fleet size are as follows:
3 Class 73s, 11 Class 158, 30 Class 159, 2 Class 421, 45 Class 444, 127 Class 450, 91 Class 455, 30 Class 458, 6 Class 483. (148.197.112.82)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.197.112.82 (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleet size 

message: "The launch falls under a provision that states that a rail operator may try a new low-cost ticketing system for up to 30 weeks, which means Megatrain may last only 30 weeks from the start date." - it's well over 30 weeks since Megatrain launched now, and it's still going, so this sentence doesn't seem to  be accurate. 86.143.51.153 11:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 weeks? 

message: This doesn't apply to the Virgin-operated services, only the SWT-operated ones. On Virgin, Megatrain customers may use any unreserved standard-class seat. 81.159.61.58 04:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designated carriage 

message: Comencing on 30th March 2009. Routes from London St Pancras International to East Midlands Parkway by train then to Hull via Doncaster and Scunthorpe, York via Castleford and Harrogate, Huddersfield via Bradford and Halifax by Megabus. Should there be a new page created for this, or should be added to the Megabus or Megatrain article??? This posted on both discussion walls. Amgmichael (talk) 10:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MegabusPlus
Talk:Sandal (disambiguation)

message: Might I make a recommendation? Instead of having a dabbed page titled "Sandal," the article pertaining to the footwear is moved to Sandal and this page is moved to Sandal (disambiguation). Thoughts? Valtoras (talk) 21:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion regarding possible redirect 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sandal (footwear) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 10:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process
Talk:Ceviche

message: Ceviche according to the books I’ve read is prepared similarly to kinilaw which is a raw fish dish from the Philippines that is essentially not cooked in fire but cooked in room temperature vinegar and citrus juices.  Remains of kinilaw were dated to 900-1200 AD in ship burial sites in the Philippines.  With known contact of Polynesians to South America and the Botocudos tribe having Polynesian genetics in their ancient burial remains.  The method of cooking kinilaw is believed to have been passed from the Philippines through the Pacific to the Americas. 75.40.185.108 (talk) 02:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Kinilaw should only appear in this article in the "see also" section. It has no relationship whatsoever with Ceviche besides whoever supposedly calls it a "Philippine Ceviche" (likely someone who knows nothing about Philippine cuisine or Ceviche).--MarshalN20 ✉🕊 13:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceviche or Kinilaw 

message: The RAE dictionary proposes a possible origin to the word Ceviche; however, it is not definitive. Quizá means maybe or perhaps in Spanish. The alternative origin word is 'Siwichi' meaning fresh fish in Quechua, a pre-Columbian language.
Cebiche
Tb. ceviche.
Quizá del ár. hisp. assukkabáǧ, y este del ár. sikbāǧ. 71.208.234.96 (talk) 22:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cebiche according to RAE dictionary.
Talk:Business organizations

message: Redirects needed (done)
BD2412 T 22:03, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

message: What is a Bancorp?  I've noticed it being used in business entity names the same way Corp., Inc., Corporation and so on are used.  But without any of those corporate indentifiers.  Is a Bancorp something special only used by banks?  Or is this just some word that businesses have decided to use on their own? References: US_Bancorp, ONB website -- Suso 02:51, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like an advertising gimmick - no state has created a business form by this name. bd2412 T 03:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, except don't these corporations have to use their actually corporate name with the right word, whether it be Corp., Inc., Corporation or Incorporated.  I know there they can use a DBA, but the about pages and contact us pages for their websites would have their real corporate name I would think. -- Suso 04:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bancorp 

message: I'm suggesting that this page be merged with Companies law. It's part of an overall concept - I think we only need two main pages, one to deal with the main kind of company law, limited liability corporations; and one for that and the other forms of companies discussed on this page. Please see the other comments I've left on the Companies law page, and please leave some advice if you have it! Wikidea 10:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Pat Rafter

message: Was Rafter really born in Mount Isa?  Him and his family lived in the suburb of Carseldine in Brisbane when he was playing professionally.
Sure was, was in Carseldine playing at the Coops tennis centre before playing professionally.
What about that light patch in his hair?  Is that why they call him skunky?
137.94.80.118 19:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed this section as inherent WP:POV.  There is no justification as to why this section should be re-added but I'll put the detail here just in case...
*1994 Wimbledon  (vs. Sergi Bruguera)
*1997 French Open (vs. Sergi Bruguera)
*1997 US Open (vs. Andre Agassi)
*1998 US Open (vs. Pete Sampras)
*2000 Wimbledon (vs. Pete Sampras)
*2000 Wimbledon (vs. Andre Agassi)
*2001 Australian Open (vs. Andre Agassi)
*2001 Wimbledon (vs. Andre Agassi)
*2001 Wimbledon (vs. Goran Ivanišević)
The Rambling Man (talk) 15:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Memorable matches" section 

message: The article needs a bunch more sources and has been tagged accordingly. SunCrow (talk) 23:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more sources
Talk:Interferon beta-1b

message: This reads like cut and paste off a drug company pamphlet.--Gbleem 23:11, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tico

message: As a Costarican I can assure you that the proper name is COSTARRICENSES, only persons or people with no education will use the COSTARRIQUENO or COSTARRIQUENSE.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.246.117 (talk) 01:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Is the feminine form tica?  (That would be the obvious thing, but I don't trust the obvious!) —Tamfang (talk) 01:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  gender?
Talk:Marie Wilson (soap opera actress)

message: I wish to rename this page to something like "Marie Wilson (soap opera actress)", because the article for Where's Huddles? links to this article rather than to one for the more famous Marie Wilson, a film and TV actress who lived from 1916 to 1972. --JHVipond 23:30, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dear Wikipedia,
PLEASE replace "soap opera actress" next to my name with "actress" or 'Canadian actress".  I act in tv, film, and theatre, and putting a label like that is limiting my job opportunities. There are many other actors/actresses who have been in soap operas much longer than me, and they aren't labeled as "soap opera actress".
Thank you for your immediate response!
Much appreciated,
Marie Wilson (actress)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.235.150.93 (talk) 04:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  soap opera actress
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Participants

message: I'd like to suggest that this Category be changed back into a list as it was originally and as it mostly still is.  The list is more useful, because it allows people to put their particular areas of interest, as most people have done, so that they could be contacted if work is needed in one of those fields.  I know that in general there has been a trend away from lists of Wikipedians toward categories of Wikipedians, but a project page like this seems to me to be a different matter.  Chick Bowen 23:31, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. --Siva1979Talk to me 11:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a few edits to that effect but would prefer a list as well --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 14:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Yakima Indian Painted Rocks

message: Note: The title, "Yakima Indian Painted Rocks" is in all beginning caps. Don't know if this needs to be changed (or moved) to convention, but before doing so please understand that "Indian Painted Rocks" is the title of the site and hence the proper name. The choice to change it I leave to someone else. Hikingbert 23:42, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled