lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Pan's Flight

message: I updated the maximum capacity of Disneyland section for the attraction to reflect the current Disneyland Resort policy of two adults and one child.  --Andysund 07:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Maximum Capacity

message: A recent editor said there was no conveyor belt, but in WDW, the ride does use a belt to load guests. It isn't a omnimover ride though, its an overhead monorail system. --blm07 08:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed "omnimover" because at Disneyland there's no conveyor belt.  I didn't know they used a conveyor belt at WDW.  I guess since it's an overhead monorail, it's still not an omnimover - as you said.  --Linda 05:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The term "Omnimover" does not mean a ride system that moves continuously, nor one that has a conveyor belt, it refers to ride systems that can be tilted or rotated as the vehicle moves, like those in Haunted Mansion.  Bill321 (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conveyor belt 

message: I just removed this from the article because I checked the scene in the ride recently when I was in Disneyland and I did not hear any of this at all. If there was it was likely drowned out by the music and the big ben clock chiming repeatedly. If anyone can prove this can be heard in the scene, feel free to re-add it (with a source).   trainfan01  —Preceding undated comment added 01:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police siren 

message: This article claims that Peter Pan's flight was developed by Arrow Development, but gives no reference to support that claim.  The Wikipedia article on Arrow Development makes no such claim, so why does this article make that claim?  The book Roller Coasters, Flumes, and Flying Saucers by Robert Reynolds, which provides the history of Arrow Development, does not include Peter Pan's Flight in the list of rides that Arrow build for Disney, nor does any other source I could find.  Bill321 (talk) 00:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrow Development
Talk:William W. Bibb

message: The image which accompanies this page is actually of Thomas Bibb, William Wyatt Bibb's younger brother.  The brothers don't look anything alike.64.240.208.169 18:38, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong image

message: Congress Bioguide shows William Bibb was born in Amelia County, Virginia .  Political Graveyard shows Prince Edward County, Virginia .  Alabama Department of Archives and History shows Amelia City, Virginia which appears not to exist .  I realise a part of Amelia County became Prince Edward County, but that was in 1754 well before Bibb was born.  I just looked up in Find a Grave and it shows he was born in Prince George County, Virginia .  Where was he born? Jjmillerhistorian 11:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: Hello, there is an article here, http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/face/Article.jsp?id=h-1416, that might be useful. 
Thanks, 
Justin --Duboiju (talk) 15:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link

message: No mention of slave-owning. I feel that this category should be restricted to people whose slave-owning history was notable in itself. Valetude (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American slave owners
Talk:Technological Institute of Textile & Sciences

message: I was sure when I saw the name this was a hoax, but it appears to be real.  --Xyzzyplugh 15:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  On a a similar plane along with South Harmon Institute of Technology // 3R1C 01:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Academy of General Dentistry

message: Hello.
I recently received an error regarding the Academy of General Dentistry page appearing as an advertisement.  When I created the document, I attempted to neutralize the content so that it was similar to the American Dental Association's (ADA) page.
Please let me know how I can change the text so that it conforms to the NPOV policy.  The end goal is that it will appear under "Dentistry," "Organizations," "United States."  There is already mention of the AGD in that section, but I wanted to provide a more detailed article so that people can link to the page.  The only option currently available is the link next to it that links to our Web site.
Thank you,
--Agdmedia 15:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a paid editor for the Academy of General Dentistry. I would like to update the logo for the organization as we have done a redesign since the last time this page was updated. I also need to ensure the leadership information is up to date.
Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AGDComm (talk • contribs) 17:57, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please put specifically what changes in the text you would like to see on this page.  Once you have 10 total edits(you have four as of now) and your account is four days old, you can upload images/logos.  Please follow the advice about conflict of interest you have been given on your user talk page. 331dot (talk) 20:57, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update logo 

message: User:Academy of General Dentistry User:Agdmedia User:Allison.Jones.AGD are all editors of this page Gsquaredxc (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (September 2022)
Talk:Ghost Whisperer

message: Jennifer Love Hewitt did not win the Saturn Award in 2006. She got nominated but lost.
This is even listed on the Saturn Awards Wikipedia Article. Tim Correll (talk) 21:32, 07 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Saturn Award for Best Actress on Television, it does list Hewitt as the winner in 2006, though even that is still not accompanied by a reliable source to back it. The official website for the Saturn Awards isn't even listing the winner/nominees for that category prior to 2015 (), and trying to search even for the recent years seems not to be working there. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saturn Awards 2006 

message: I work at a Walmart. They are selling a supposed "complete series" of Ghost Whisperer. However, the DVD set only has four seasons. Does anyone have any information on this? Could this be added to the article? Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 12:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete series? 

message: Is it just me or is this section referring to a film, and not the programme the article is about? BillhomEls (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:Deepwater sculpin

message: Most of the article text is now direct quotation from the source and was introduced by User:Aquaticspeciesatrisk with the summary " - provided by DFO, made available (with permission under GFDL)". The source website itself announces "The material on this site is covered by the provisions of the Copyright Act... , ...Reproduction of multiple copies of materials on this site, in whole or in part, for commercial redistribution is prohibited without written permission from..". -- Olaff (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright?
Talk:Scorpaenidae

message: Per WP:COMMONNAME, commonly recognised name should be used.  Someone changed it to Scorpaenidae because it has other common names, but that is an entirely wrong reason, because scorpionfish is the common name most usually used. That there are other names is irrelevant to how the article should be titled. Hzh (talk) 10:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should be titled Scorpionfish
Talk:Scorpaeniformes

message: The article says: "Species in this order have recently been reclassified into the Perciformes."  I have not seen this in any text books and the Order still appears in Fish Base @ . If it is true that they have been reclassified, then this article should be merged with the article @ [].--Jake901 (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

message: This article names the lingcod (1.52 m; 59 kg) as the upper end of the range, but the skilfish article lists its max as 1.83 m and 91 kg. Shofutai (talk) 05:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest scorpaeniform fish (inconsistent articles)
Talk:Alert pigfish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Pool Shark (Drake & Josh episode)

message: To be redirected. Treebark (talk) 15:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To what? Says who? Why?  Try to be less cryptic, please. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 20:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redir
Talk:Hurricane Lane (2000)

message: Decent attempt at such an article for this storm, though more information is needed for it to be kept. For example, do you have rainfall totals? You say damage was minimal, but do you have any info on it? If no more info is found, sorry, but I think it should be merged. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It should be merged in its current state. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 20:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

text: But they had records and a long, well-written storm history. Lane doesn't have that. --Hurricanehink (talk) 12:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo/merge?
Talk:Siona Atreides

message: Added cleanup tag — this isn’t an encyclopedia article, it’s a book summary. -Ahruman 15:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it needs fixing, but NOT deletion. That makes the problem of lack of information worse, not better. I've restored it and will try to improve it, please do not turn it back into a pointless redirect. --Noclevername (talk) 16:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am as big of a Dune freak as anyone, but everything in this stub (and everything that could really be said about the character) is already covered in the GEoD article, or can be added. At the point where someone devotes a chapter in a book or something to analyzing the character in a notable way, perhaps she will need her own article, but until then, no. — TAnthonyTalk 03:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:World of Sport (Sydney, Australia TV series)

message: This is most definitely not the best name for this article.  --Xyzzyplugh 15:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Hi Matt91486, welcome to this head-scratcher of an article. As your edit summary pointed out, we seem to have two "Ron Casey"s in Australia, each that at some point in their careers were sports presenters, each possibly hosting different, unconnected shows both named "World of Sport".  In the discussion linked above, I suggested a PROD before we debated the move, to which Gonnym agreed.  I spent a solid hour trying to figure out if this was a case of mistaken identity, conflated careers, etc... and I honestly don't know what the actual truth is because its down hard to track down sources for two such similar things. If this show really existed, then it lasted a much shorter time than the other one, which lasted about 30 years. What are your thoughts on how to proceed on this article? -- Netoholic @  09:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article status
Talk:Scorpaena cardinalis

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Template talk:WikiProject Websites

message: I was just wondering about how we should use this one? Put it on all website articles? Or just pages which are directly linked to the project, for instance its main page? Thanks--Heebiejeebieclub 15:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage

message: Any objection to setting computing-importance to default value of Low if no value is explicitly supplied? -—Kvng 17:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: computing-importance

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Template:Websites. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 29#Template:Websites until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Magioladitis (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Template:Websites" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Lingcod

message: would be nice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.212.250 (talk) 20:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range map 

message: Almost the entire article has been lifted verbatim from a Canadian Government web site: http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/sci/sa-mfpd/lingcod/ling_lifehistory.htm and http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/sci/sa-mfpd/lingcod/ling_aging.htm. According to that site, use for non-commercial applications is allowed, but should follow these guidelines:
* Users exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced;
* Fisheries and Oceans Canada be identified as the source department; and,
* The reproduction is not represented as an official version of the materials reproduced, nor as having been made, in affiliation with or with the endorsement of Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
I'll add this to the article. --Mmm (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing attribution 

message: There are twobroken images in the gallery. I am not sure how to fix them.
DouglasCalvert (talk) 19:00, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that those images have been deleted.  I could not find any trace of them on Wikimedia.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Broken Images in Gallery 

message: I added the comment that the blue colour might from biliverdin, and cited an NPR article: 
 
HOWEVER: that article claims that their source for the biliverdin claim is Love's book: 
 
This book says nothing about biliverdin as far as I can tell.  A quick look at Google Scholar netted this article but it doesn't seem to say that biliverdin is the cause of the lingcod's colour, based on Google Translate. --Slashme (talk) 08:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPR source is dodgy 
Talk:MacRitchie Reservoir

message: is it peirce or pierce reservoir... this article mentions both spellings. Chensiyuan 15:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be Pierce, will correct it. —Sengkang 15:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore's 100 Historic Places. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 08:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cyclopterus

message: Shouldn't this redirect be removed? It is a specific species from the family, it needs an article. Dryke (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the redirect should be removed. I've now started a (very basic) species page for this well-known fish. RN1970 (talk) 21:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Shouldn't this article be merged with the Lumpsucker article? Both talk about the same fish! 2.51.93.76 (talk) 18:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they should not be merged. Cyclopterus lumpus is called the lumpsucker, but this is also the common name for the entirely family (which includes Cyclopterus lumpus and some 25 other species). In other words: Cyclopterus lumpus is an article for a specific species. Lumpsucker is an article for the entire family with all its members. 62.107.193.56 (talk) 15:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Andreas Klöden

message: This should be moved back to Andreas Klöden. Andréas is the French way of spelling it, and he's German. On his website it's without accent, and the Tour has a habit of turning French names of cyclists, such as calling them Yan Ullrich or Mickaël Rasmussen. --Danilot 15:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You´re right! I´m german and I´m sure you can´t write Andreas with an accent!Dagadt 17:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: Andréas Klöden → Andreas Klöden – The man is called Andreas, without accent. See for instance Andreas-Kloeden.com and Klöden's profile on the T-Mobile Team website. The reason the page was moved ("to match with the TDF website") comes across as a very weak reason, particularly if it isn't done without prior discussion. — Talk:Andréas Klöden — Aecis Appleknocker Flophouse 19:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has been moved back to Andreas Klöden. I would like to keep this discussion open though, to reach some kind of consensus on the name. Aecis Appleknocker Flophouse 20:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as nominator. Aecis Appleknocker Flophouse 19:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
This is still relevant :-)  SeveroTC 17:37, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as nominator. Aecis Appleknocker Flophouse 19:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Add any additional comments
This is still relevant :-)  SeveroTC 17:37, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Oriental flying gurnard

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Whpq (talk) 13:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Psychrolutidae

message: The depth discussion has some factual errors. Noting the Marianas Trench, which is the deepest place in the Oceans of the world is just shy of 11,000m deep, how can these fish live up to 28,000m deep? Letterboxfrog (talk) 13:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depth ranges for Psycholutridae
Talk:Supreme People's Court

message: I just added some useful links about the Court itself, but didn't have time to put the other links (including links to English versions of the Constitution, etc.) in their right place - they belong on other pages, including the page on China's legal system.
Feel free to move them there, or if they already are present, to delete them outright.
This is just a quick edit to preserve the links I found.
Eh Nonymous 15:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Rename per WP:COMMONNAME and China. All the China articles should match the country name; we shouldn't have to keep having to have an RM on every single article. Timrollpickering (talk) 22:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *I'm fine with that alternative. The current name is unnecessarily long. -Zanhe (talk) 12:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  See Supreme People's Court (disambiguation). Two countries take 'Supreme People's Court'. Refer to WP:TWODABS. 'Supreme People's Court of China' is the primary usage, not 'Supreme People's Court of Vietnam'. So this is moved to .  Sawol (talk) 03:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Communist countries are ruled by Communist parties, Supreme Courts don't have any authority there. The question - how did change the authority of this court till 2005?Xx236 (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staged justice