lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:DIN rail

message: Does anybody have a link to the standard DIN rail box sizes / outer envelope / maximum sizes ?
The module size for e.g. circuit breaker modules is described in the DIN 43880 Standard.
A brief description of the outer envelope with minimum/maximum dimensions can be found on page 2 of this datasheet (Italtronic modulbox XTS):
http://docs-europe.electrocomponents.com/webdocs/139f/0900766b8139f862.pdf
—————————
Why is it used ? What is it used for?
-----
I added a section about the module widths, but couldn't find a reliable source for them. The standard module width is 17.5 mm, so a device with a width of 4 modules would be 70 mm wide (4 * 17.5 mm). An enclosure may have space for 20 modules, and if the devices follow the module widths (they usually do, but not always), there's no "wasted space" in the enclosure. The height and depth of a module are definitely also standardized, since most devices have that distinctive "staircase" shape when viewed from the side. All of these measurements are probably in the DIN standard, but I don't want to pay for the standard just to find out... Humpparitari (talk) 11:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard for module size 

message: The type names shown in this article are not verifiable outside of particular vendors catalogs.  I believe the standard designations are actually DIN 1, DIN 2, DIN 3, etc.  — fcsuper (How's That?, That's How!) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) —  00:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "types" don't seem standard 

message: Omega is a manufacturer and that's a more likely source for the name than any reference to a letter.
Of course, if there is a source for the name, it should be added.
https://www.omega.com/pptst/DRTB-RAIL.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.92.94.122 (talk) 08:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omega 

message: It is notable that such a simple term "DIN rail" is used in many languages as a common term these days, because of the huge influence it had on the electrical box installations. In the old days, you needed a board, drill holes precisely, then make threads in those holes, then ATTEMPT to mount your equipment, such as relays, circuit breakers and such. The holes didn't always fit, the metal waste from the drilling and thread cutting was a mess and the falling and disappearing flathead screws and bolts were a disaster.
Ever since the Din rail became commonplace, nobody bothers with the old installation methods anymore. You just mount the rail (if not already mounted) and plug in everything you need and just do the cabling.
The "DIN rail" had conquered the world by how practical it is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.149.115.252 (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural and technical significance
Talk:List of Westfield shopping centres

message: Please ensure the list on The Westfield Group includes only one-two main locations for each country. I'm not familiar with the international operations so I didn't list any.
Best criteria would be, for each country, top three by leasable floor space.Garrie 12:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Music of Kanon

message: Someone who reads Japanese and knows the wiki are more then welcome to add these Kanon-albums.
http://www.astost.com/bbs/read.php?tid=50700 Please save the page because it's only possible to view it once with out to register, or you must delete the cookie.
Victor b04 12:27, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added in all of the albums from that link, minus the drama CDs which aren't really soundtracks anyway.--(十八|talk) 21:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Albums 

message: If you plan on adding doujin soundtracks, be prepared for a lot of work...
http://www3.tky.3web.ne.jp/~sug01/oekaki/dojinongaku.html
69.236.20.191 21:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this is exactly why I removed the unofficial albums; there's just too many of them, and most of them are non-notable, if not all. So only the official albums are included on this list.--十八 22:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doujin soundtracks... 

message: I was thinking "Kaze no tadori tsuku basho" should literally be translated The place where the wind arrives, not place of which wind arrives.  Or more poetically (and less accurately), the place where the wind blows.  But I wanted to get to a consensus before making any change...--Charizardpal (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The title is currently translated as "Where the Wind Reaches", except on the "Last regrets / Place of wind which arrives" single because that is the title printed on the album cover.--十八 05:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: tranlation of song titles
Talk:Green River, Utah

message: It was my understanding that the portion of Green River that was in Grand County was anexed out, so that Green River was all in one county. Crashedata 12:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Every census since 1910 (the first one after incorporation) gives the name as Green River. And as explained in the article, it no longer spans the county line. Ntsimp (talk) 04:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is part of Green River Still in Grand County
Talk:Tommotia

message: Does anyone know what phylum researchers place Tommotia in now?  Palaeos says that it's in "Order Mitrosagophora," but, says that it's considered a "procoelomate." --Mr Fink (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Paleobiology Database puts it in phylum "Problematica", a formal way of saying "unknown".  The Vinther et al. paper cited in this article cites references suggesting Tommotia and its kin may be stem brachiopods, but that doesn't seem to be a settled conclusion. Cephal-odd (talk) 01:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Weird, Simon Conway proposed a link between the halkieriids and brachiopods, while Palaeos talks about a link between the tommotians and halkieriids.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:43, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification of ''Tommotia''

message: Should we still post the old/erroneous reconstruction to show what they used to think what it was?--Mr Fink (talk) 04:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Tommotia has been portrayed as an early cephalopod in books before, so I say keep the old picture because it represents that historic interpretation. Cephal-odd (talk) 00:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  As For the Old Version
Talk:Partington

message: "The town was served by a railway station to the north of the town, the Cheshire Lines Committee Glazebrook to Stockport Tiviot Dale Line. The station was opened in 1873, eight years after the line opened, and was in use until 30 November 1964."
This isn't quite correct.  The original line was much lower than the present one, with the construction of the canal an embankment was built immediately south of the old line and led to a bridge over the canal tall enough for ships to pass.  The old line remained in use as a terminal - indeed even today you can still approximate the layout of the sidings as seen heading north from the old line here.  The old line goes underneath the road (you can see the new road bridge, the road now is on a slightly different alignment, the old alignment was more northerly), the new one goes over it on a now closed bridge.  If you look southeast and northwest you can clearly see the two lines.  Have a look on www.old-maps.co.uk - it will help explain what happened.  The old station is no longer visible, the one pictured is the new station. Parrot of Doom (talk) 11:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transport 

message: What does "Although served by buses in the day, bus services to the town at 6:30 pm" mean? Its not clear from the context.--Jackyd101 (talk) 02:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Woops, thanks for pointing that out. The sentence now makes sense . Nev1 (talk) 02:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentence fragment

message: According to  Partington is still a deprived area. J3Mrs (talk) 16:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprivation
Talk:Archbishopric of Riga

message: Did Friedrich von Pernstein really become bishop as early as 1304? If so, were there officially two bishops for several years, or is the end date for Jens Grand (fetched from that article) wrong - was he a bishop without a seat for six years? /Dcastor 19:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of Office Holders 

message: I am downgrading the assessment of this article for the WikiProject Latvia. Where are the references? Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 20:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Footnote 2 is unclear or wrong. There is at least one joint coin issue of Linde and Plettenberg, with Linde's arms (Lindebaum). Source: Livonian Coins, G Haljak, 2010 Haljak 416. Peterk2 (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Coins of Jasper Linde
Category talk:Croatian writers

message: I dont get why 
Ivo Andrić
Miljenko Jergović
Musa Ćazim Ćatić
Safvet-beg Bašagić
Mak Dizdar
are in this category.
While the first two are bosnian-croatians and could fall into this category, they are still bosnians.
And the last three are clearly bosnian.
Would please someone fix it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.146.149.15 (talk • contribs) , 12:49, 2 December 2006
Well, this isn't such problem.
In fact, the writers should be categorized according to following criteria:
1) language they wrote on. You could be Laotan writer or Suahili writer, no matter that you're coming from e.g. Tungusia.
Point is:
Ivo Andrić, at the beginning wrote in Croat language. He's Croat from Bosnia, that at the beginning declared himself as Croat, later... whatever. Important is, that he wrote in Croatian language.
Miljenko Jergović. Who puts him here? He doesn't belong to Croat poetry.
Musa Ćazim Ćatić, Safvet-beg Bašagić and Mak Dizdar are inserted here, because they declared themselves as Croats during their life. Maybe some of them changed their nationality declaration, but if even during part of their life they declared as Croats, they should belong to category writers in Croat language.
Maybe we should make categories that distinguish writers according to the language they wrote on. 
E.g., some Croats wrote on Croat language, German, Latin, Serb, Italian, Hungarian... 
On the other hand, what about many Croats that write/wrote in Croat, but they came from other countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Slovenia, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Argentine, Chile...? 
Or what about the members of various nationalities from Croatia (or maybe from other countries) that wrote in Croat language? 
2) country they worked in. Kubura 07:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Pyotr Shabelsky-Bork

message: Having searched Google Scholar for sources discussing the assassination attempt (primarily by searching for "Nabokov" and "Milyukov" + "1922" in English, Russian and German) I'm unable to find coverage that adds up to WP:GNG for the incident. Merging it to the biography of Shabelsky-Bork, or perhaps Sergey Taboritsky seems most appropriate. signed, Rosguill talk 17:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Attempted assassination of Pavel Milyukov]] into [[Pyotr Shabelsky-Bork]]
Talk:Sergei Nilus

message: === Serge ===
The are many variations on the transliteration and translation of Nilus's first name.
:Accordingly, I propose adopting the one that is most like English, and the briefest, namely Serge.
:Yours truly, --Ludvikus 17:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contents 

message: The are many variations on the transliteration and translation of Nilus's first name.
:Accordingly, I propose adopting the one that is most like English, and the briefest, namely Serge.
:Yours truly, --Ludvikus 17:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Serge]] 

message: The appears to be a failure to distinguish the views of Nilus from those of the antisemites who subsequently, in 1920, and after, compiled, edited, and translated his version.
Yours truly, --Ludvikus 22:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1920 editors/translators of Nilus 

message: It is not necessary to analyze this (above) text - instead reference should be made to the above "main" article. --Ludvikus 13:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Protocols of the Elders of Zion]] 

message: This was an inappropriate external link toan unscholarly site . --151.202.101.75 02:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  silverbearcafe.com 

message: The above scholar is the world's foremost authority on Nilus. 151.202.101.75 02:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Michael Hagemeister]]
Talk:Hermann Goedsche

message: In this article it says that Goedsche plagiarized Joly. But in the article about The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, it says it was the other way around (?) --Pinnecco (talk) 14:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Umberto Eco, Goedsche in his novel Biarritz plagiarized Alexandre Dumas' Joseph Balsamo (as it says in the article) and Eugène Sue's Les mystères du peuple. But I think I've never heard that Goedsche directly borrowed from Joly. The common theory is that the motif of the conspirators' secret meeting on a cemetary (which Goedsche took from Dumas and Sue), after having been published independently from the rest of Goedsche's novel, was merged with material from Joly's satire to create the infamous Protocols. --Filaq (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who plagiarized who? 

message: I removed the first weblink, as it leads to a personal blog which (despite its title) contains nothing about Goedsche/Retcliffe whatsoever. --Filaq (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weblinks 
Talk:Sergei Trufanov

message: guy
Something strange going on here. A guy, named  Solntsa90 deleted  a category about anti-semitism  ... it was not in a biography on Iliodor according to him. Then I added a reference about Iliodors view on Jews from his autobiography. The guy deleted the reference, which is close to vandalism, and says it needs a reference? Taksen (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Kanshū Nippon Jōshikiryoku Kentei Kyōkai: Imasara Hito ni wa Kikenai Otona no Jōshikiryoku Training DS

message: 1. Deleted the "literal Japanese title", as it was clearly taken from a translation engine and made no sense. If you want to put the literal version of the long Japanese title in, it's something like: Under the supervision of the Japan Common Sense Aptitude Examination Association, Things you can't ask [other] people about at this point: Common Sense Training for Adults DS
2. Added info on the Japan Common Sense Aptitude Examination Association, but that may or may not be the organization's official English title (if they even have one). Their "about us" page does indicate that they approve of the translation of 常識 as "common sense" - http://www.josikiryoku.com/what.html. However, considering that in playing the game today I was asked about the names of the works of some composer from the Meiji Period, "common knowledge" may be a more apt translation.
124.210.205.17 12:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing notes
Talk:List of ambassadors of France to the Ottoman Empire

message: == Image caption ==
The Ottoman sultan in 1699 was Mustafa II (1695-1703). Ahmet III (1703-1730) reigned later. Thus the image caption must be revised. Either the date or the name of the sultan must be changed. I'll call the editor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't remember if this was what the original caption said, or if it's something I looked up myself, but both options are arguably prone to mistakes. If you have researched the issue and think the caption needs to be changed, please do - and in fact thnks for your vigilance. Cheers, Dahn (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The Ottoman sultan in 1699 was Mustafa II (1695-1703). Ahmet III (1703-1730) reigned later. Thus the image caption must be revised. Either the date or the name of the sultan must be changed. I'll call the editor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't remember if this was what the original caption said, or if it's something I looked up myself, but both options are arguably prone to mistakes. If you have researched the issue and think the caption needs to be changed, please do - and in fact thnks for your vigilance. Cheers, Dahn (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image caption
Talk:Kemal Atatürk Memorial, Canberra

message: == only memorial on the world for enemy? ==
i heard that, but i am not sure. somebody told this is the only memorial for enemy on the world? anybody has a referance?cause its important  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yetjanissary (talk • contribs) 01:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: i heard that, but i am not sure. somebody told this is the only memorial for enemy on the world? anybody has a referance?cause its important  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yetjanissary (talk • contribs) 01:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  only memorial on the world for enemy? 
Talk:Krakus

message: The legend of Krakus is one of the most famous legends of Poland. If you visit Krakow, Poland, and do not know the legend of Krakus, you will not understand the significance of the dragon statue outside the castle. I added to this page a photo of the dragon, along with an explanation of the legend as it was told to me by a Polish man of Krakow when he took me to see the castle. Below my entry I left the version of the legend that was already on this page because I was not sure if I was allowed to delete it, but I have never heard the story
told in that way, and my first reaction upon reading it was, "That's not the right story!" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eirne (talk • contribs) 13:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this should be under "Krak", not "Krakus".-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Krak
Talk:Ariosophy

message: The following important fact should be added:
The central importance of "Aryan" racism in Ariosophy, albeit compounded by occult notions deriving from theosophy, may be traced to the racial concerns of Social Darwinism in Germany.[1]
[1] Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, The Occult Roots of Nazism, New York University Press, Washington, 2004, , p.14 
The question is, where's the best place? Thanks --Teutobald (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  roots of racism 

message: Since Ariosophy is a Nordicist mysticism. Many people confuse their ideology and think that by "Aryan" they include all "Europeans" or even all Caucasoids. Barbar02 (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article need more references to the Nordicism
Talk:Mettupalayam, Coimbatore

message: Have rebuilt the article and put most of the unorganised previous content into "Things to see and do" sunsection. This still needs to be worked on.Petkows 13:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Mettupalayam has almost the same title, is one paragraph long and all the content could easily be merged here. I'll do the merge in a few days if there are no objections.
Darcyisverycute (talk) 04:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Overtaken by events: Mettupalayam has been restored to a disambiguation page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page merge
Talk:Greenford High School

message: *             Can we please make this article more relevant? Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.90.116 (talk) 22:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is essentially an advert for the school. It isn't what Wikipedia is for. Does anyone have the knowledge of the school necessary to write a more balanced and information-based article? At the moment I've added an NPOV tag to it. Ed zeppelin (talk) 19:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV template without ongoing discussion per [[Template:POV]] instructions
Talk:Bald Eagle Creek (Little Juniata River tributary)

message: I see a new disambiguation for Bald Eagle Creek (West Branch Susquehanna River). This seems rather complex, and I'm not sure the shorter creek needs a separate article. I had added a note about it in the body of the main article. It is in a separate watershed, but it begins in the same headlands, and runs along the same valley. Dhaluza 13:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: I moved this article from "Little Bald Eagle Creek" to "Bald Eagle Creek (Little Juniata River)". The reason is that the official name is "Bald Eagle Creek", as can be seen by checking the USGS GNIS entry here. I do not see "Little Bald Eagle Creek" as a variant name at the GNIS page or PennDOT maps. Ruhrfisch 04:06, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move from "Little Bald Eagle Creek" to "Bald Eagle Creek (Little Juniata River)" 
Talk:Germanic runic astrology

message: It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Runic divination
*Disagree This article should have it's own entry just like the following do:
*Celtic astrology, *Western astrology, *Babylonian astrology, *Horoscopic astrology, *Hellenistic astrology, *Persian-Arabic astrology, *Medieval & Renaissance horoscopic astrology, *Uranian astrology, *Nahuatl astrology, *Maya astrology, *Chinese astrology, *Kabbalistic astrology, *Cosmobiology
*Psychological astrology or astropsychology. It has it's own history and sub-histories and this needs an article of it's own. I think if it is left then those in the known can expand on it. FK0071a 13:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

message: At the current time, this is not an article. I am redirecting this to Runic divination, and if anyone can make sense of this or cobble together some verifiable sources Nigel Pennick, Guido von List, etc. then please create a sub section at Runic divination and merge the information in. The current material will still exist in the history of the entry. - WeniWidiWiki 00:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For mine and anyone else information, this information can be found at it's last edit here. FK0071a 16:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect