Talk:Realty Bites

message: Hi. Here is my GA review. I'll list things as per the Good Article criteria:
*1. It is well written
:*Wiki-link Homer and Marge in the lead. 
:*You could easily expand the lead; even though this is a rather short article the lead could be longer.
:*Snake is wiki-linked twice, no need for this. Actually many things are wiki-linked twice. They should be linked on there first mention and not after that (unless in lists or captions).
*2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
:*State where and on what network it first aired. Just saying the date isn't enough.
:*Lionel Hutz is a character. Doesn't say this in the lead, if I didn't know I would think he was a person. That whole sentence needs to be rewritten.
:*You might want to be more specific, or find a better description for 'murder house".
:*I'm guessing Homer and Snake are fighting while the car is moving? Should state this.
:*"At the end of the episode Homer introduces her to government welfare." - introduces her? Exactly what did he do?
:*The staff? The writers, producers, who?
*3. It is broad in its coverage.
:*Surely there was more of a reception then from just one book? Can't you find more then that?
:*You mention Hutz and Phil Hartman in the lead but not in the main article. You shouldn't do this. It should be mentioned in the article. It would be appropriate to have a few sentences on this because it's significant that it was Hutz's last appearance. They retired the character after this didn't they? 
*4. It is neutral.
:*No probs
*5. It is stable.
:*No probs
*6. Images.
:*:Image:Realty Bites.jpg needs to have it's resolution reduced.
:*Wiki-link in captions where appropriate.
Ok. Apart from those things is fine. I've placed the article on hold. I'll keep it on hold for at least a week unless everything is addressed. Following that I make no guarentees I won't fail it. Please contact me on my talk page if you have any problems. - Shudde talk 09:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, a couple of things. You still havn't explained "murder house" properly, and the one sentence on Phil Hartman isn't really enough. The lead looks better now though. - Shudde talk 22:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for getting back to us about these points, and commenting that the lead looks better.  I left a note for , so hopefully those last two points will be addressed shortly.  Cirt (talk) 00:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't anymore to say about Hutz being retired. Hartman was murdered, so they retired his characters out of respect. That's all there is t it. Gran2 19:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK thanks for that. Looks better now, especially the murder house section. - Shudde talk 19:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 

message: * -- Reduced image resolution for :Image:Realty Bites.jpg.  Cirt (talk) 16:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, a couple of things. You still havn't explained "murder house" properly, and the one sentence on Phil Hartman isn't really enough. The lead looks better now though. - Shudde talk 22:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for getting back to us about these points, and commenting that the lead looks better.  I left a note for , so hopefully those last two points will be addressed shortly.  Cirt (talk) 00:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't anymore to say about Hutz being retired. Hartman was murdered, so they retired his characters out of respect. That's all there is t it. Gran2 19:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK thanks for that. Looks better now, especially the murder house section. - Shudde talk 19:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addressing points from GA Review 

message: I don't have the DVDs so I can't check the commentary. The top says that the writers wanted to do an episode where the job does not work out, while the production notes says the opposite. Which one is right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.177.48.86 (talk) 22:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for point that out. The production section was wrong, they wanted one where her job did not work out. Thanks again! CTJF83Talk 02:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Work Out or Doesn't?