Talk:Electronic money

message: something like that:
        	pegged with an other currency        	decentralised	fixed total amount    	requires trust in someone
bitcoin 	no                                   	yes          	yes                   	no
paypal  	yes, national currencies (mainly USD)	no           	no                    	yes
pecunix 	yes, physical gold                   	no           	as much as gold itself	yes
Ripple  	yes, any currency                    	yes          	no                    	no (P2P trust)
webmoney	                                     	             	                      	
-- Grondilu (talk) 14:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this kind of table has merit.  Only caveats:  WP:Verifiability for all cell contents and an explanation of the column headings.  --Ds13 (talk) 14:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. perhaps not the trust column, but the rest of it looks good. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 08:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:   I agree too.  A table listing the key differences of Electronic money would improve the article.  The column headings could be linked to sections explaining that aspect. Jonpatterns (talk) 13:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  A good table would be very useful, but I'm opposed to adding one unless it relies primarily on a table (or tables) from a reliable source (or sources). I'm basing that on having seen what happened with a simple table in cryptocurrency; it grew more complex, with columns of data that don't have clear answers, let alone answers that fit into a small space, and is now a lot of apples-to-oranges comparisons and dubious information cobbled together from many different sources. I've also seen feature tables have columns added to present one listing in a more favorable light (e.g., a column with a feature that only one listing offers, such as proof-of-stake in cryptocurrency's table, added solely for Peercoin), while relying on a source like Consumer Reports or PC Magazine for a table means that independent source chose the criteria being compared. Agyle (talk) 17:33, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I guess the trick is in designing the table - ensuring neutrality and meaningfulness. Apples need to be compared to apples and the oranges could go in a 'other notable features' column. Jonpatterns (talk) 18:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about a table? 

message: Could somebody describe me why it is so informative?
There are three pretty strokes.
Let compare with Money article...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.94.94.55 (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: RIP grammar... I have no idea what you are saying. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 08:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why it is so informative? 

message: At the moment, E-cash is a redirect to the now obsolete section Electronic money#Off-line 'anonymous' electronic money. What to do about it? Is there a current section to suitably replace it? Should the redirect go to the article as a whole? Changed to another article, maybe related to Prepayment? Or be deleted at all...? --KnightMove (talk) 10:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do about redirect "E-cash "?