Talk:Famous Monsters of Filmland

message: Moved from article page: 
 (Is Ray Ferry a pseudonym of Forrest J. Ackerman?)
No. Ray Ferry and Forrest J Ackerman were in 'partnership' during the relaunch of FM in '93.
Ackerman left the magazine in dispute with Mr.Ferry and is no longer associated with the 'new' publication.
-Some strange editing going on here.  Someone is trying to delete any/all mention of Forrest J. Ackerman from this article.  Every sane person agrees that Ackerman was the heart and soul of FM for two decades. Is this an encyclopedic article about an influential magazine and its famous editor?  Or is this a pro-Ray Ferry fan page?  (Is Ray Ferry himself making the edits?)HorsePants 21:10, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow!  That's crazy!  Removing Forrest J. Ackerman from FM's history would be like writing an article on "Playboy" sans any mention of Hugh Hefner.  I'm glad you reverted the article back to its earlier version, but I still think it had some problems.  Specifically, the last paragraph devoted way too much space (I think) to Ackerman's successful libel suit against Ferry, so I've edited it down to about half its former length.  I also removed some disparaging comments about the new FM; while arguably true, the comments did not conform to Wikipedia's NPOV policy.Hal Raglan 05:53, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Actually, turns out an administrator has already blocked this vandal, at least temporarily.  Looks like somebody else got sick of his shenanigans! 200.122.158.40 21:35, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

message: This site : " http://www.moviemags.com/main.php?title=FAMOUS%20MONSTERS%20OF%20FILMLAND&etos=1993 " seems to have an issue 200 contrary to the article's assumption of V2 beginning with issue 20199.233.216.31 (talk) 18:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  issue 200? 

message: This paragraph was slightly revised on 30 July 2009, with reference link provided.  Please review in regard to the April 2009 request for copy-editing. 13:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-edit request: Recent Pop-culture Connections

message: http://www.famousmonstersoffilmland.com/
http://www.famousmonsters.com/
Which, if either, is legit? If there is any legit present-day comtinuance, the article should document their claim to legitimacy. Bustter (talk) 03:23, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  duelling websites? 

message: On 23 March 2010, Zombie433 added a citation to the "Libel lawsuit" section.  The reference links to a Dread Central article of 23 March 2010 regarding the imminent publication of a new print version of Famous Monsters.  While the link is informative (and this Wiki article is in dire need of references), it doesn't relate to the section in which it appears.  A new section about the 2007 aquisition of the FM trademark and the activities of its owner-- including the magazine's 2010 revival-- seems to be needed. The News Hound 23:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Libel lawsuit" reference addition

message: A series of edits from 10 February 2011 here are worrying as they were by IP  (with almost no other edits), had no edit summaries, blanked a  section and removed about 8% of the article. 220 of Borg 10:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worrying edits 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Famous Monsters of Filmland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080226083015/http://retrocrush.buzznet.com:80/kong/ to http://retrocrush.buzznet.com/kong/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080316230842/http://retrocrush.buzznet.com:80/archive2005/kong/ to http://retrocrush.buzznet.com/archive2005/kong/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Famous Monsters of Filmland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080720053113/http://www.horror-wood.com/fm.htm to http://www.horror-wood.com/fm.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Famous Monsters of Filmland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060203050057/http://milwaukee-horror-hosts.com/Variety.html to http://www.milwaukee-horror-hosts.com/Variety.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This is just for the information of those who might be interested. 
The idea of Famous Monsters of Filmland including the 10 issues of its sister publication Monster World in its number count to get to 100 sooner might sound like cheating, but it’s actually quite justified. At the time Famous Monsters was bi-monthly, and Monster World was published the month Famous Monsters wasn’t. 
In fact, in the first issue of Monster World (Nov 1964) they said this: “...for all practical purposes, FAMOUS MONSTERS and our brand new companion, MONSTER WORLD, are one and the same! Same editor...same publisher...same staff...same great stuff! You asked for FAMOUS MONSTERS 12 times a year -- it’s here. One month FM, 4 weeks later, MW. Like -- wow!”
The real question is why not simply make Famous Monsters monthly, instead of putting out 2 different alternating publications?  74.104.189.176 (talk) 01:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of comics and magazines did this: i.e., twin bi-monthly titles, in alternating months. This meant that each issue stayed on the newsstand racks for two months instead of one, resulting in a few more sales. WHPratt (talk) 14:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  including Monster World in the issue count