lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Pipe organ builders

message: How should A.R.Schopps Sons (the pipe maker) be handled? Should they be lumped in like OSI, or should we create a category for supply houses?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by FozzyMaple (talk • contribs) 18:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Question

message: How do we want to handle those who build hybrid insturments - those insturments that have stops with both pipe and electronic sources?  We have categories for both pipe and electronic organs?  Do they belong in one or both categories, or is another category appropriate?
JesseG 01:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not just combine this category and :Category:Electronic organ builders to create a :Category:Organ builders?  The electronic organ builders category has only four articles in it, and this combination would solve the question above. —Sesquialtera II (talk) 01:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Much easier to just make :Category:Pipe organ builders and :Category:Electronic organ builders subcategories of :Category:Organ builders. Then anything that doesn't go in the subcategories goes in :Category:Organ builders. Madder 02:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:De Lisle College

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De Lisle Roman Catholic High School  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  17:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD discussion 

message: ... in line with discussion. This needs some expansion to get to Start class.Victuallers 14:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged for quality and importance

message: The current date of "late 1990s" for the building of the "new block" is wrong.  I started there in 1993 and it wasn't new then. I don't know when it was built though. Does anyone else?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.80.39 (talk) 15:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern languages block
Talk:Long-distance motorcycle riding

message: I am not sure if this page would be considered notable enough or whether it should be a candidate for deletion. Could someone with a knowledge of this topic please provide further information - otherwise I will list it for deletion in a week or so. It may be an important mailing list or it may just be a vanity article. Thanks. Witty lama 01:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would assume the sport should come first - meaning that this page should talk about "long distance riding" rather than the mailing list itself. However the mailing list would be a perfectly reasonable chapter within the larger page about the sport. However, the question still remains - is long distance riding a sport or is it just like if I were to make a page about the sport "walking down the street". :-) Witty lama 02:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

text: OK then, but this page definately needs to be wikified and expanded then. I'll see if I can do some linking to other related WP pages and put some categorisations up to start with. Witty lama 03:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I started copyediting this article, but have now concluded that 99% of the material is actually related to 'long distance riding', rather than the mailing list.  I therefore propose that the page be renamed Long distance riding and the material is copyedit'd and wikified there, with a section for the long rider mailing list.  Comments?  Kcordina 13:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So, do you support changing the article name to Long distance riding as proposed, or not? Kcordina 15:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of name?

message: Well, since the proposed move only got positive responses, I have gone ahead and done it.  I've had a very quick swap around and stuck some fairly arbitrary titles in for sections.  It now needs some proper to get it into a good form. Kcordina 09:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Moved 

message: Long distance motorcycle riding has a name and its called “Motorcycle touring“”, I suggest changing the name. Lets say its the counterpart of Bicycle touring
====Long distance motorcycle riding → Motorcycle touring====
Google hits for: 
*Long distance motorcycle riding: About 1,670,000 results (0.12 seconds)
*Motorcycle touring: About 14,300,000 results (0.10 seconds)'''
— Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 19:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Petition for Name Change/Merge

message: Google hits for: 
*Long distance motorcycle riding: About 1,670,000 results (0.12 seconds)
*Motorcycle touring: About 14,300,000 results (0.10 seconds)'''
— Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 19:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Long distance motorcycle riding]] → [[Motorcycle touring]]
Talk:Janet Jones

message: I've added an additional one to two sentences concerning the breaking news concerning allegations against Janet Jones, as well as other people involved in the National Hockey League, concerning allegations of a gambling ring. --Resident Lune 01:48, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we get a source? I can help you with citation. - Ta bu shi da yu 01:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure.  Here is a link to the article on FOX Sport's.com: http://msn.foxsports.com/nhl/story/5313610 --Resident Lune 01:52, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If I placed the source in improperly, please feel free to edit it to a more proper form.  I placed the source in the External Links section.--Resident Lune 02:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's the deal with the playboy magazine cover?  I know it's true that she did the photo shoot, but the image (especially at this size) makes this aspect of her biography overshadow everything else.  How about instead a picture of her and Wayne?  I have some photos of Wayne, Janet, and both that I took a few years ago, which I would be happy to scan and upload. -Aude (talk | contribs) 16:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think if you have a self-created image, that's of decent quality, that you wish to upload, that would be great.  As a matter of policy we'ld be obligated to give it preference over a nonfree image (like the one currently used).  So, it would be great if you did upload such an image.  Personally, though, I would prefer to have at least one image to be exlcusively of her (not just part of a couple). --Rob 16:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have to look back at what I have.  Might have to crop a picture, to include just her. -Aude (talk | contribs) 16:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you do this, I would suggest uploading the broader (as a "couple") image, and the cropped one, perhaps both to Commons .  A "couple" shot would make a nice addition to the  Wayne Gretzky article, in English, and in other languages. --Rob 16:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, definitely. -Aude (talk | contribs) 17:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:CPO-STV

message: Do you know of any software for computing CPO-STV with Meek's method? Samulili 17:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software for computing? 

message: Has this voting method received any attention from third-party sources unrelated to its inventor Nicolaus Tideman? If so, they should be included in the article. At the moment, the only two sources were both written by Tideman. Robofish (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third party sources 

message: The current example is a thinly disguised single-seat election, comparing AV with Condorcet (see below).
Can anyone come up with a better example, with at least two places in doubt, and perhaps a Condorcet cycle?
Or provide a link to better examples elsewhere?
Explanation:
Under any form of STV A and C will be elected, and C has 9 surplus votes to transfer, all with next preferences BD.
Hence the competition for the third place is a simple contest for one place between B, D and S, with first preference votes 16, 13 and 21 respectively. D's 2nd preferences split as B (8) and S (5); while all the 2nd preferences of B and S are for D.
Then the calculations on the page can be explained from (1) Under Av, D is excluded, and S beat B by 26-24;
(2) the other two pairwise comparisons are D beats B by 34-16, and D beats S by 29-21, so D is the Condorcet winner.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.86.121.62 (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a better example
Talk:Melodi Grand Prix

message: This page was rated C because of its depth in coverage. The only factor holding it back from B class as it looks is its lack of references. The colors on the table are somewhat overwhelming as well. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 18:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: a new logo have been made and can be found on this website: www.nrk.no/mgp84.208.77.64 (talk) 14:09, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  the logo is outdated
Talk:Charles McMahon and Darwin Judge

message: For the purposes of this article, it would be useful to define what is meant by the last-to-die.  What event marks the end-pont?  There were certainly American POW's that died in Vietnam after these two men did.  Johntex\talk 01:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: McMahon and Judge died on April 29th. The Fall of Saigon marked the end of the Vietnam War and was complete by April 30th. Therefore, McMahon and Judge were the last US servicemen to die during the Vietnam War (not the last US servicemen to die because of the Vietnam War nor the last US servicemen to die while in the country of Vietnam). —L1AM (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Defining terms
Talk:Melodifestivalen

message: This older Featured Article has not been reviewed since its promotion in 2007, and the article needs an update to meet the current FA criteria. Issues:
*There is a lot of unsourced content here. FAs are "supported by inline citations where appropriate";
*Many of the citations do not cover the full preceding claims;
*The prose needs work, for instance:
:*in the Hosting section, we go from the early 2000's to 2013, to 1975 and then again to the early 2000's. There are also repeated facts there (the Finals being held at the Friends Arena);
:* - is it going or is it discontinued?;
*Considering that this is an annual event, it's concerning that the most recent source is from 2012.
Article needs work. RetiredDuke (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it needs work, I'll also see if I can add some sources this week. However I did notice that it was peer reviewed a year ago. ―JochemvanHees (talk) 20:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That is correct, it wasn't in the article history so I missed it. RetiredDuke (talk) 13:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA concerns 

message: Haha 2A03:2880:20FF:3:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 07:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orlando pirates
Talk:Ralph Siegel

message: Recently an edit was made to suggest that Ralph is a "songwriter", but not a composer. A songwriter can be a person who writes the music, lyrics or both. As far as I know, Ralph only writes music. Can anyone correct me? Does he do lyrics as well? If so, please cite a reference. Thanks. EuroSong talk 20:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Songwriters are not covered by the 'art music' Composers Project, so the question is not really about whether or not he composes per se. --Kleinzach 02:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it is actually.  He writes in the pop idiom and writers of popular and folk music (even if they don't write the lyrics) are called songwriters, normally.  See the explanation at the end of the composers article.  Hence, I also changed the word in his entry.  --Jubilee♫clipman 03:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

text: BTW, there aren't any sources in this article, anyway, so how can we verify what he is?  You might actually start by saving this article from the Deletionists... then we can argue over his precise designation re songwriter/composer.  Eurovision is not my field but I suspect EuroSong could come up with a few decent references.  --Jubilee♫clipman 03:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer

message: Why is "River of Silence" so notable that it deserves a special mention? Image of me (talk) 05:07, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: River of Silence

message: The article for that song lists a Ralph Maria Siegel as the composer. Is he the same person as this Ralph Siegel? I highly doubt it, since I can't possibly imagine an 11-year-old writing a popular song about booze. But stranger things have happened. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 22:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[In Heaven There Is No Beer]]
Talk:PyMOL

message: DeLano Scientific LLC is proposed for deletion. I agree. PyMol is notable. The company is not. I have merged into PyMol the sentence describing the company. --Bduke 02:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Just a notice to editors who occasionally upload Pymol pictures to wikimedia commons. SharkD created a template to mark Pymol pictures on the Commons:
   SPLETTE :] How's my driving? 01:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template on Commons to mark images made with Pymol 

message: Unfortunately I don't think I'm qualified to do so, as I haven't even used any post 1.2r2 builds.   Does anyone have current and/or concrete information about the direction Schrödinger is taking PyMOL that would be willing to help update this article.--Chemistry-grad-student (talk) 01:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be updated to reflect a Schrödinger-era PyMOL 

message: I'm not qualified to fix it, but the caption for the image https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pymol_8_view.png lists seven modes of operation, but there are eight different modes displayed.  The caption should name all the modes.  --Sean 22:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The second to last is the one that's missing a description.  The caption jumps from "Goodsell-like" (third to last image) to "B-factor putty" (last image).  I can't think off the top of my head what the second to last image is supposed to be, looks like a slightly glossier version of "Standard surface" to me. (+)H3N-Protein\Chemist-CO2(-) 14:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

text: I still don't know the correct name for this rendering mode, so I've just called it "glossy surface" for now.  Hopefully we can find a better name for it at some point, although it does look exactly like a glossier version of 'surface' to my eyes at least. (+)H3N-Protein\Chemist-CO2(-) 01:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad caption 

message: Could be added Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/Elements coloring scheme? -DePiep (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: -DePiep (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  PyMOL colors
Talk:Cleanth Brooks

message: No reference to "The Overwrought Urn"?  ;-)  AnonMoos 02:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean The Well-Wrought Urn???
----
Please don't use "smartquotes". AnonMoos 17:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

text: While much of the recently added content is very good, it's going to need a comprehensive cleanup for style and to prune unnecessary peacockish and non-neutral language.  I'll try to get to this if I can, but I'd invite other editors to step in sooner. -- Rbellin|Talk 18:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'd be interested to know how Brooks could receive a B.A. from Vanderbilt University in 1928 and an M.A. from Tulane University the same year. 
Also, it mentions that Brooks received a B.A. from Vanderbilt University and then another B.A. in England. It would be interesting, and perhaps add some clarity, if the major were mentioned for each B.A., or at least if some hint of the difference between the two degrees were given. All it says now is that he received a B.A., then an M.A., then a B.A., and then a B. of Letters. CorinneSD (talk) 22:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The early years 
Talk:Erich Heckel

message: I've taken out the links to Franzi Standing and Franzi Reclining, the works no longer being hosted in the linked locations. They'll need to be replaced at some point. --Cantara 02:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Links
Talk:Chaos Theory (film)

message: Right now, in the plot summary, it is said that his wife sets the clock behind 10 minutes. Actually, in the film, she sets it ahead 10 minutes. This is a plot hole, as this would make him earlier for things, rather than late, but that is what happens. Should we keep it as "behind" and have it make sense, or switch it to "ahead" for more accuracy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.207.206.210 (talk) 17:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe in Canada they have a different perspective on time?  As someone whose wife has a habit of setting clocks "ahead" (advancing the time forward w.r.t. the actual time) I found that point in the film to be a little bit off, but I got over it.  It may have just been a poor choice of words since they never fully explain it, it is just alluded to that the wall clock shows 8:15 when it was really 8:25, which could be thought of as "ahead" depending on your choice of perspective. --Jmeden2000 (talk) 16:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot hole
Talk:T. D. Mischke

message: On a broadcast sometime in January or February 2007, Mischke told a story about when he was a TV commentator for St. Paul Saints games in the 80s or early 90s. Any evidence is probably lost, but it would be awesome to have some sort of reference to this. mrcool1122 00:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try finding it on the podcast.  Obviously a suitable link to it and a time stamp should be enough of a citation I think.. EnsRedShirt 05:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have this clip where Mischke is speaking about being a TV commentator for the Saints.  It will be posted within a few days on the mischkemadness site.--Dreleven 05:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Paul Saints 

message: The "Saint Johns" It links to is NOT the St. Johns Mischke attended.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_of_Saint_Benedict/Saint_John%27s_University Is the correct page. Could someone correct this please?
:Fixed.
:--Blakeops 23:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint Johns 

message: Changed the wording of the opener, as "was" makes it sound as if he died.  I would argue he's still a radio personality anyway, even if not currently employed. BLHersey (talk) 22:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording 
Talk:MC Solaar

message: Le chat habite dans le grande pomme du terre por mon ami MC Solaar. C'est vrais!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.122.233 (talk) 00:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nothing about the Guru death controversy? Some section about that issue should be added.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 11:12, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Guru's death
Talk:Squidbillies

message: At time of this talk section, article classifies as Non-Canon Fiction.
Starting somewhere around season six, there became elements that are serial, mostly including a baby being born who ages as the show goes on. I'm looking for guidelines on how we go about selecting classifications for TV Series, but am not sure how to search for them.  If you have any information please tell me via my talk page. Harlequence (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Canon Fiction 

message: Hey, just wanted to point out that in the show Dougall county is in the Appalachian mountains. Not only is it mentioned in the first episode of the show, but through dialogue with Early he mentions that "Lumpkin is the next county over" 
Thanks,
199.21.230.118 (talk) 23:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue Ridge Mountains 
Talk:8t88

message: Disagree. Major character in the games and plenty to write about him. --maru  (talk) contribs 03:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've redirected this page because the article makes no assertion of the character's notability and is entirely an in-universe plot summary with no discussion of real-world impact and critical response. --EEMeltonIV 19:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Pied butcherbird

message: The photo in fact shows a Grey Butcherbird, d'oh! --Jquarry 03:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, not sure about that one. Need to check up in the ol' birdbooks...Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:25, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Yeah, sounds good to me :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Davis Motomiya

message: This page needs a sections for personality and appearance.--24.10.182.89 (talk) 07:14, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete

message: When does Davis finds out that Veemon was origonal Ryo's digimon. Strike Chaos 00:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe it ever happens in the anime, just in one of the video game plots. May or may not be "canon" depending on one's view. Different people worked on the game than who worked on 02. -- Ned Scott 01:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: video games are generally considered to be from a different alternate universe to the anime, even if they share characters. Kind of like Ryo in the games and Ryo in tamers. --`/aksha 10:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although that is the case for the Digimon Adventure and 02 DigiDestined that appeared in Digimon Digital Card Battle, Ryo who appeared in Digimon Adventure: Cathode and Anode Tamer, Digimon Adventure 02: Tag Tamers, Digimon Adventure 02: D1 Tamers and Digimon Tamers: Brave Tamer is canon (but not without a few plotholes), and Digimon Adventure 02: Tag Tamers greatly effected Digimon Adventure 02. Anyway Davis never finds out, nor is Ryo ever mentioned in 02, we only see him in a flashback. Nightmare SE 13:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know those games where supposed to be in the same 'cannon' as 02. But the point is really that video games in general (when they're based off existing series) are not considered to be on the same level of 'cannon' as the original series. It's like, they can be official, and officially 'cannon', but still considered an AU because plot elements/characters/and so on get adapted for the purpose of a game. If digimon had different levels of cannon (something like what star wars has), the anime would be the highest level of cannon. Games such as the ones you've listed would be officially 'cannon', but of a lower level. --`/aksha 01:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: When does Davis finds out

message: am i the only one counting the team numbers for that universe, davis's son is leader of team #4 not team two as stated. (That was davis's team)HHS.student
: They were not an actual team like the DigiDestined in Digimon Adventure or 02, I removed it. Nightmare SE 00:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Digidestoned team #4

message: Is really Davis the narrator in Digimon Tamers? Tamers is a different continuity, so it's hard to be real. Can someone confirm that?
The voice at the end of each episode that did the "to be continued" thing was his, at least, in the dub it was. Not sure about the original version.24.107.59.242 18:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamers narration
Talk:Blackburn, Victoria

message: This article contains information about one school that exists in Blackburn North, that being Old Orchard Primary School. I have just added further information about schools in Blackburn North. Should this stuff remain in this article, or be shifted to Blackburn North? --Commking 03:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say it should be shifted to Blackburn North. A similar issue came up at Talk:Belgrave, Victoria. Cnwb 05:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's done. --Commking 06:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fulvia Célica

message: Three pictures of one woman with only a two paragraph article seems somewhat excessive for an encyclopedia. Specifically, it seems to me like Vanity. I have thought about removing one or two of the pictures, but I am interested in the ideas of others on this. Let me know what you think.   Andrea Parton 03:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vanity