lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chico Carrasquel

message: Whooah.. Don't know what this looks like to most people but the formatting comes out really badly on Mozilla Firebird. Images obscure the text.  Isomorphic 23:32, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Swedes in music

message: They should be removed from the list, firstly, they are norwegian, furthermore their name is spelled "Turbonegro". --81.231.178.242 (talk) 20:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Turbo Negro ???
Talk:United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

message: The DC Circuit website doesn't mention an official reporter, and neither does the Bluebook. In fact, I've never seen a reference to an official DC Reporter. Unless someone can provide substantiation, I'm going to remove that reference in a week.
--24.193.52.119 (talk) 02:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to Official Reporter

message: Please note and contribute to this discussion. Billyboy01 (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Table standardization

message: Are there really 'seats' on the court?  When a president nominates somebody to this court, does he need to specify which 'seat' he is being nominated for?  If so, then some explaination of which each seat does as opposed to another seat, should be explained.  If the only difference is the date the 'seat' was created, then it really isn't a seat, but more an enlonging of the bench which the judges share.  And if that is the case, then the idea of the 'seats' should be removed.  Rodchen (talk) 04:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there really 'seats'?  

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United States Court of Appeals for the Zeroth Circuit. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States Court of Appeals for the Zeroth Circuit listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: However obscure the predecessor court may be these days,that this court is not the same as,but can very easily be confused with,the United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia is exactly why there are hatnotes.
I firmly disagree with the deletion of the reference.71.105.190.227 (talk) 06:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote completeness
Talk:TI-85

message: What year, to be exact, was the TI-85 discontinued?? 66.245.28.250 00:42, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That was an April Fool's joke.  Re-adding.  --72.145.221.129 10:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

message: "This development made the TI-85 the first graphing calculator that allowed assembly programs."
The HP-48_series had out of the box support for machine language programs long before the TI-85 exsited.--DataSurfer 18:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First to run assembly? 

message: One of the worst things that can happen: loss of your programs and data painstakingly keyed in on that keyboard did happen. Not just to the loss off all battery power, but the very power saving mode turning off the Ti-85 during compilation would cause a nasty data loss crash. 
The Computer link was a saving grace. The 1.1 link version did not allow you to edit things on your computer. The 2nd version of the link was gray in color and did allow you to edit your programs on the computer and then upload them to the Ti-85  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.128.13.66 (talk) 00:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bugs 

message: The TI-85 does some strange things that probably deserve at least some comment in the article.
For example, implicit multiplacation has the highest priority in the order of operations (and how it applies to the temperature converter), only graphing half of a function depending on how it is entered, problems from power save auto off activating while compiling, and maybe some other things.
Granted, there are very many bugs and glitches, but the ones that affect ordinary use should be mentioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.198.32.130 (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally quirks, gripes, and common problems are to be avoided unless well known and cited in reliable, edited, and refereed publications.  Common problems are encyclopedic as they usually are written as a result of personal experience rather than academic citation. Nicholas SL Smithchatter 19:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TI 85 Quirks
Talk:Dune (1984 film)

message: An editor has requested that :Dune (Dune album) be moved to :Dune (1995 album), which may be of interest to editors of this page. You  are invited to participate in the move discussion. -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 06:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Related move requests

message: The redirect Dune (1984 film has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 01:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Dune (1984 film]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Hi, I'm notifying editors who may he interested in participating in the discussion at Talk:Lady_Jessica#Proposed_infobox_image_change. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 17:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notification of infobox image change proposal at [[Lady Jessica]]
File talk:Tank Man (Tiananmen Square protester).jpg

message: What the hell? The Wiki interface sucks. It’s way too easy to accidentally revert an image without realizing what you’re doing—it's not intuitively obvious the (rev) link takes an action. And if someone replies with “B-b-b-but there’s a legend!” I’ll sock them for not understanding the meaning of intuitive. This shit is so typical of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisux (talk • contribs) 18:51, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry - accidently reverted. Should be back to normal - agreed: reverting is too easy!  Jgritz —Preceding undated comment added 18:31, 20 September 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki interface

message: Is there a reason the image was reverted to a grainier version?--Daveswagon 00:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This never happened. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.128.192.4 (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversions

message: Is it a still form the video of the events, or was the video by someone else in the balcony?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kabdoun (talk • contribs) 10:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Picture by Jeff Widener 

message: Hello,
I wonder if this picture can be upload in other languages projects because of the permission of using by Wikipedia (it is not precised on WP EN...).
Actually I am working on French article of the protests and this picture would be very usefull!!
Fuhraih (talk) 10:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you can upload it to French WP. The only problem you might encounter is that neither permission templates , ,  or  have the respective Frech version. You may consider to translate these templates to Frech WP youself or you can ask French template specialist for help.  -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using the picture in other Wikipedia projects 

message: Here: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=3100157871795 --MaGioZal (talk) 06:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The photo before the photo

message: http://i.minus.com/iHHVQwK8L6s3u.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.127.221 (talk) 11:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate image (shorter focal length) 

message: Seriously. I don't care what bs you have to say about copyrights. This is an iconic and historical image. If you don't think you have a duty to the truth here on Wikipedia, then leave and don't come back. - Cyborg Ninja 06:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia policy about iconic and historical (NFCI#8) explicitly states that it does not override NFC. Sorry.--Skyfiler (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't believe people would try to delete this iconic image
Wikipedia talk:Utilities

message: I couldn't think of any reason why this page shouldn't stay as it was, and exist alongside Wikipedia:Topical index. I think it is useful in its own right. Some users may not want a list of all articles in the Wikipedia namespace. -- Tim Starling 00:34, Apr 16, 2004 (UTC)
:I moved some of the redirects back to this location. If you find an intermediate-size index helpful too, I suppose that's a reasonable justification for its existence. It needs considerable updating in some places, though. --Michael Snow 20:11, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep this page 

message: Is "Guidelines", rather than (key) policy, isn't it?  Alai 04:13, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the Manual of Style is a guideline, per the  template at the top of it. – Wbm1058 (talk) 13:13, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual of Style 

message: * Recent changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenAveling (talk • contribs) 10:50, 3 December 2005
** Well, Special:RecentChanges would only link to this page if it was actually recently changed (like it will be for a short time after I click the  button)  – but I suppose you meant that Special:RecentChanges should be added to the list of Wikipedia utilities on this page? Wbm1058 (talk) 13:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant links to this page 

message: * Start with the fact that over 25,000 User talk pages link here, mostly because someone added a template which included a link to Wikipedia:Utilities to the talk page of new users. Some recently, as not all of these userspace templates have been kept updated. – Wbm1058 (talk) 13:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speaking of links to this page 

message: With so many pages linking here, I don't see dumping them onto a historical page which is only of interest to historians and researchers as a good idea. Note that discussion of the history of Wikipedia utilities begins at Wikipedia talk:Topical index.  There you see that the index to the Wikipedia project namespace originated at Wikipedia utilities, before there even was a project namespace. Wikipedia utilities, which soon became Wikipedia:Utilities, was billed as a repository for pages that are useful to "doing things" in Wikipedia, for the benefit of regular editors and contributors. Isn't that what the project namespace is for?  Now, one might argue that the main index, or "portal" into the project namespace is Wikipedia:Community portal. However, I'm redirecting to Wikipedia:Project namespace, where a brief mention of its origins as Wikipedia utilities can be made. – Wbm1058 (talk) 22:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[Wikipedia:Project namespace]]
Talk:Risk (game)

message: 1. Not adding to Gameplay or Strategy sections
2. History is anemic; the game is issued and played in many foreign countries, which ones, and how did it get there?
3. Is there a governing body that sanctions competitions and issues titles?  Where is it headquartered?  What are the titles and qualifications for them?  Who holds or has held them?
4. What competitions are there (Mind Olympics?), how often are they held, where?
5. What are the SIGNIFICANT differences between the themed variants?  Not details here, but fundamental character of the games.  Why would you want one of these instead of the standard version?
6. Is the Franklin mint version interesting?
7. Are the any notable Risk players (maybe chess grandmasters who play risk, professors, PHD game scholars, TV personalities, ?)
8. If it's one of the most popular board games in history, what's the marketing/sales data show? 
It's going to take some digging from here, not just transliterating a game manual or copying elements from a book on playing the game.
Sbalfour (talk) 03:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for expanding the article 

message: I can't believe that the episode in Seinfeld where Kramer and Newman plays Risk isn't mentioned in the article! 194.132.239.157 (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture. 

message: The map at the top of the page has Yakursk instead of Yakutsk. Is this fixable?
2601:200:C002:70D0:896:AA5E:F4A2:3972 (talk) 04:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map typo 

message: War is a Risk clone that made much success in Brazil and IIRC was the origin of the secret mission cards.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaslopes (talk • contribs) 15:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention the Brazilian game "War" by the company Grow 

message: In both representations of the map (geographical and graph) there is a number associated with each country, but the significance or origin of that number isn't explained. Is there some source where that is explained? Otrebus (talk) 16:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The number associated with each country
Talk:Anger

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Vexation. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 20#Vexation until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 05:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Vexation" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: In my opinion, the hyperlink on the word 'rage' in the article should be placed in the 'See also' section to link to the 'Rage' Wikipedia article as in my opinion it looks strange having just one bold word as a hyperlink outside of the 'See also' section of the article. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 00:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperlink on the word 'rage' should be put into the 'See also' section
Talk:Sony Ericsson P900

message: From the article: "The "touch-screen" allows you to do quite a lot. Instead of pushing buttons all the time, you can simply use a pen-like device, a stylus to push an on-screen "button". The "button" is just like on your computer. The stylus acts like the arrow on a pc or mac, and by pushing on the screen, you "push the button on the mouse". The touch-screen also allows you to write characters directly on the screen. Like write an a, you get an a on the screen". Can't we rephrase this? Peter S. 22:26, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Not encyclopedic

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 14 to Apr 20 2004, consensus not reached within the time limit.  Discussion:
* Same as the Nokia models. We don't need a separate page for every model of every product ever sold. Milestones can be noted in the manufacturer's article, and/or articles on the related new technology. Niteowlneils 21:04, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I should have mentioned merging when I added it. Niteowlneils 00:31, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion
Talk:Tokenization (data security)

message: Tokenizing is the operation of replacing one set of symbols with another, typically to make the resulting set of symbols smaller.
This is not the common usage of the term. In computer science it normally means to split a string up into tokens (e.g. key words, separators, etc.), not to replace a list of tokens with smaller tokens.
I am not familiar with the usage tokenizing given in the previous version of the article, but I will leave it as an alternative meaning of tokenizing until I can verify whether it is incorrect or not.
Steve-o 03:47, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: This could well be just a copy/paste from any of those websites from the companies who sell the service. As any technology it has it's limits and calling it secure is... well subjective at best. I'd rather vehemently object to the articles objectivity. Unpaid advertisement comes to mind.
"This secure billing application allows clients to safely and securely process recurring payments without the need to store cardholder payment information. Tokenization replaces the Primary Account Number (PAN) with secure, randomly generated tokens."
eNTi (talk) 09:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It definitely is written like a marketing piece and has a WP:PEACOCK issue which I have tagged. I have also run a WP:COPYVIO check to make sure that it was not copied from industry marketing materials. The opposite appears to be the case, industry marketing materials are using excerpts from this article. ~Kvng (talk) 14:50, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an Ad 

message: I've removed an assertion that tokens used in Apple Pay could "be used in an unlimited fashion or even in a broadly applicable manner." This is factually incorrect. Apple Pay software utilizes the host device's Secure Element, which is a physical chip inside the device. The token stored on the device only has value when used by that same device, i.e., without the Secure Element, the token is useless. The removed assertion had no citation for me to refute further.
Source: https://support.apple.com/guide/security/secure-element-and-nfc-controller-seccb53a35f0/1/web/1
~ JDCAce (talk) 16:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apply Pay
Talk:Fire and brimstone

message: I don't think anyone in the West has heard a truly fire and brimstone sermon for a long time.  John MacArthur is perhaps the closest well known very-conservative preacher in our time, and he doesn't quite preach at the Jonathan Edwards level.  Outside the West it is still popular, in particular Africa and China (in underground churches), and rarely in Chinese disposra and Hong Kong, Taiwanese, and Singaporean churches.  No scholarly researches here, but I will let others find.  --JNZ (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fire and Brimstone

message: I've just checked the Quranic reference, and the words "fire" and "sulphur" are both absent from the Arabic. Perhaps the "Islamic reference" doesn't belong in this article? 95.149.94.252 (talk) 15:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Quranic Accuracy

message: From my research, it appears that the Earth's crust was unknown to us until the early 1900's.  It's amazing that a book written thousands of years ago was able to accurately describe the earth's core (fire and Brimstone(sulfur)).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.53.113.2 (talk) 17:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Biblical Accuracy

message: I am British but wonder if this should be spelt Sulfur as English Wiki generally follows US rules.
Also, there is no explanation that brimstone = sulphur (mainly).
There is a famous play by Dennis Potter called "Fire and Brimstone" I wonder if this should be cross-referenced.
Si Trew 02-Feb-2009 02.05am GMT  —Preceding undated comment was added at 02:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sulphur" 

message: I have a bit of trouble buying the idea of Quakerism being quietist. It's almost like saying that Baptists are all Evangelical. Lucretia Mott spoke against a quietist frame of Quakerism. She said "Quakerism, as I understand it, does not mean quietism."http://www.quaker.org/mott/no-passivist.html Artsygeek (talk) 01:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quakers Quiestist? 

message: The smell associated with lighting (and high-power electrical discharges in general) is due to the formation of ozone, not sulphur dioxide.
..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.37.139.84 (talk) 09:49, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smell of sulphur?
Talk:Crittenden–Johnson Resolution

message: Should the actual text of the resolution be corrected for errors? That is, are misspellings and grammatical errors in the original, or errors unique to Wikipedia? Wmahan. 04:18, 2004 Apr 15 (UTC)
This interpretation is highly POV, and blatantly an attempt to prove that the American Civil  War was not about slavery. It needs a better discussion of the political context, particularly the political calculus of maintaining control of the upper South, not to mention the close relationship between slavery and secession. The errors are of omission.
On the vote see Congressional Globe, 37th Congress, 1st session, pp. 223 and 265.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Megnal (talk • contribs) 04:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Once again we pretend Missouri and Kentucky didn't secede. 
* http://www.constitution.org/csa/ordinances_secession.htm#Missouri
* http://www.constitution.org/csa/ordinances_secession.htm#Kentucky
Wikipedia is consistent, if not factually correct.  98.101.227.58 (talk) 01:34, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missouri and Kentucky 

message: Is it just me, or does the body of the article only explain how it "passed almost unanimously in July" and not how "it was defeated by a decisive majority in December"? DAVilla (talk) 04:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shifting sentiment
Talk:Ogive

message: I do not get the graphic.
It shows dimensions of 120 and 70,
but below it there is a formula that
shows 120/100.  Where do you get the 
dimension of 100 from?  
My guess is that you left out the 
dimension of the radius of the tube,
but included the dimension from the 
center of the tube to the centerpoint 
of the circle.
Can you update the graphic OR the 
formula so it is correct? (or at least
explain it to me?)
:Yes, the tips of the arrows are meant to indicate the points between which the dimensions are measured. Thus it was 70 units from the centre of the arc to the centre of the tube, which left 50 to get to the other side of the tube (120 total), so the diameter of the tube was 100. However I agree, this wasn't the clearest way to label it. I've made a new version; please have a look and see if that's clearer. Securiger 11:07, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration

message: it would help if you would put whre the word originated from, i was asked by a boyfriend in the military what the definition is and were the word originated from and i have searched several places and cant find it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.224.46.183 (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  where the word originated from 

message: examples problems in ogive using graph  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.246.104.108 (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  graphs 

message: IP, you are moving indian sources below and imposing sassanian notion, that is not backed by any sources, please explain your edits here. Hammy0007 (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole section is a mess, with poor grammar and lack of clarity. Really pointed arch needs it own article. The earliest origins are still a matter of considerable disagreement between scholars, and we need to be clear whether the arches are corbel arches etc, or "true arches" with a strong load-bearing capacity. Johnbod (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP edit warring, please explain what you are trying to do here?