lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Acetylcholinesterase

message: Should this section refer to acetylcholine (as it does currently) or acetylcholinesterase? Shanata (talk) 14:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Species distribution section

message: The affirmation " Inhibition of AChE leads to accumulation of ACh in the synaptic cleft and results in impeded neurotransmission.[20]" is not clear, and is not correct, in my opinion.  Accumulation of ACh in the synaptic cleft leads nerve impulses to be continually transmitted, as shown by nerve agents like sarin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quantum.presence (talk • contribs) 01:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disease relevance section 

message: The BBC article "Russian spy poisoning: How the Skripals were saved" says:
:"Once the Skripals were stable and able to speak, the key concern for medical staff was how their production of the key enzyme acetylcholinesterase - needed to re-establish their normal body functions - could be stimulated.
:The body will do this naturally after nerve agent poisoning, but the process can take many months.
It would be good if some subject expert could give an overview of this. -- Q Chris (talk) 12:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in Nerve agent (organo-phosphate) poisoning. 

message: Highly illegal against Geneva protocol article 3 to use any CWA agents in any measurement. G-series or V-series including VX and Novichok. 170.62.21.182 (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illegal CWA
Talk:Archbishop of Dublin (Catholic Church)

message: When this page was first given content on 19 November 2007, the initial edit summaries failed to mention that they were incorporating text taken from earlier revisions of the page Primate of Ireland. For edit history of this page's content before that date, please see that page's history. Doops |  talk 16:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is quite bizarre that this article just stops with Curwen and 1570, this needs work - there is plenty of documentation out there, including whole books. SeoR (talk) 16:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the history since 1555/1570?
Talk:Vinette Robinson

message: I've added a reference from the BBC that says she is from Bradford, but other references state she was born in Leeds.  Any information that would clarify this would be helpful. Nick Watts (talk) 12:33, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: I've found myself repeatedly removing unsourced information and categories about Robinson's heritage from the article. They're never sourced, I personally can't find a source for this information and the information given is almost never consistent. Usually a user will add that her mother is white (which is extremely vague) and that her father was born in Jamaica, West Indies or Barbados. This leads me to believe this is complete guess-work rather than based on an actual statement or article about this subject. As per WP:BLP I'm going to keep removing this believing it's original research until a valid reference has been provided. ~~ Peteb16 (talk) 09:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heritage 

message: Her role as Emilia in Emilia, a new play by Morgan Lloyd Malcolm, at Shakespeare's Globe, London ended yesterday. Update?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.65.42 (talk) 09:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emilia
Talk:Gwen Hennessey

message: The Catholic New World says she is Franciscan, though she was living in a house run by Dominicans before her arrest.  http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2011/0717/5.aspx
Ansat (talk) 23:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order 

message: I restored wording from 2015 due to close copying from the first source in an edit in 2016 by User:Daniel the Monk. Fences&Windows 11:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio removed
Talk:Malice Aforethought (film)

message: The BBC serial should be split into its own article. --STUART (talk) 13:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Isle of Wight Festival 1969

message: "...a 60-minute film of the 1969 Isle Of Wight Festival was shown in 1970 in a tent by Fiery Creations..." 
This is something many speak of but is it documented anywhere? And where is the film?
EDLIS Café  19:18, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film  

message: I suppose that Donovan performed at this festival.
https://pro.magnumphotos.com/Catalogue/David-Hurn/1969/GB-Isle-of-Wight-Festival-NN112568.html
Thierry (talk) 02:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Donovan
Talk:The Tales of Ensign Stål

message: Shouldn't it be "second lieutenant" instead of "ensign" (a navy rank)? --85.156.236.39 (talk) 16:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The rank 

message: I have reverted an anonymous editor's changes. In Runeberg's original text, the name Dufva has the archaic spelling with fv. An editor had changed it to the modern v, as used in the Project Runeberg text to which this article links. That text, however, is a 1920s edition which not only uses modernized spelling but makes further alterations to the text, eg. "...yngst bland dem sin Sven" becomes "...yngst av dem var Sven". I can't say I know but I suspect these are "corrections" made for the benefit of schoolchildren, for whom the poems were compulsory reading those days in Sweden as well as in Finland. (Indeed I have seen a 1920s Swedish school history textbook that omits all discussion of the events of the 1808–09 war, noting only that the pupils will already be familiar with them, presumably from Runeberg's poems.)
I shall add another link to a 19th C text and add a note to the newer version. At any rate, there is no need to modernize Dufva's spelling, it being a proper name. --Rallette (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  fv vs. v
Talk:Rugby Road

message: Rugby Road is definitely an old drinking song at the University, but I can't verify whether the other songs in that snippet are Pep Band songs or University-wide. 24.125.39.99 (talk) 17:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The songs "From Rugby Road to Vinegar Hill," "Fill Up Your Silver Goblet", and "Glory, Glory to Virginia" are all UVA songs with long lineages. They were performed, in pretty much that order, on a recording of the Virginia Glee Club and UVA Band (Pep Band predecessor) on a late 1940s/early 1950s recording so have been around for at least that long. Tjarrett (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songs 

message: This article is a mess. Tone is non-encyclopedic, a lot of content could be refactored elsewhere (there is a nice long article on the School of Architecture already extant) and I have a sneaking suspicion that the whole thing has some significant copy/paste going on. This needs to be addressed before the article is rated. Tjarrett (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I went through and cleaned up a bunch of stuff:
 * Edited for tone
 * Cited or removed unattributed assertions
 * Added sections on Carr's Hill and fraternity and sorority houses (the latter needs expansion)
 * Added information about Easters
 * Restructured refs
 * Eliminated trivia section
And probably some other changes as well. Of course, now I can't rate the article. Does someone want to take a stab? Tjarrett (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup 

message: Rugby Road (the band)
Rugby Road is a rock band that was formed in Philadelphia in 1990 at Villanova University.  The band released two independent albums on WYD? Records - 1998's Times Already Happened and 2000's Different Degrees  both albums are available on itunes
The band toured heavily in the late nineties and early 2000's and opened for The Allman Brothers Band, Phish, Live, Peter Frampton, Chubby Checker, The Agents of Good Roots, Moe and The Jerry Garcia Band.
members:
Kenny Kearns - Lead Vocals, Keyboards
Derek Smith - Guitar, Vocals
Rich Pruett - Drums, Vocals
Bruce Vuurens - Bass, Vocals
www.myspace.com/rugbyroadphilly  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.209.178.11 (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rugby Road (the band)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Winter Soldier 2/Proposed decision

message: In the remedy, both TDC and Xenophrenic are to be banned from editing any page connected with Winter Soldier Investigation "broadly defined". I think the committee should be careful to lay down some guidelines, because some administrators may wish to adopt a very broad interpretation of "broad". Specifically, I am concerned with the fact that Winter Soldier investigation covered events in the Vietnam War. Would the restriction catch any page relating to that war? Perhaps where the content is related to allegations of war crimes being committed by U.S. forces this would be reasonable. There is plenty of scope for 'wiggle room' in arguing that other articles about the anti-Vietnam war movement either should be included in the restriction, or should not be. Some more specific scope is, I think, needed. Sam Blacketer 10:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The short answer is really "as broad as it needs to be to stop the edit-warring".  If the two start edit-warring over a topic in the gray area, administrators should feel free to warn and then block them.  Ideally, both parties should try to step back from this particular subject and find something they're able to edit without engaging in such levels of editorial conflict. Kirill 16:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How broad is broad? 

message: Just one thing: the remedies restrict TDC and Xenophrenic from editing any page relating to WSI. Is this including article talk pages? Heimstern Läufer (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While you are at it, can you also clarify that Depleted Uranium, and related articles, are not part of the restricted articles?  There may be some confusion, since it was part of the 3RR report raised by Heimstern here, and appears extensively in case evidence from Dlabtot, Xenophrenic, etc. Xenophrenic (talk) 19:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little clarification
Talk:2008 United States elections

message: * Incumbent President George W. Bush is ineligible for re-election per the 22nd Amendment that limited a president to two terms. Vice President Dick Cheney's refusal to run for the office makes the 2008 presidential election the first since 1928 to not feature an incumbent president or vice president as a candidate, and the first since 1952 to not have them be candidates in the general election.
What's the difference between "the first since 1928 to not feature an incumbent president or vice president as a candidate" and "the first since 1952 to not have them be candidates in the general election," besides the year? What happened in 1928 and 1952? I think we should clarify what exactly this means in the article because I don't think it's clear when you first read it. --Purifiedwater (talk) 14:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I researched the appropriate Wiki articles and clarified.  Schoop (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:Mervyn C. Alleyne

message: A tag has been placed on :Alleyne, Mervyn C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. 
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Jsferreira (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bowmanville POW camp

message: Wikipedia is not a directory of miscellaneous information. Millions of people were prisoners in one camp or another in WW2, and in general we do not list every person who was an inmate or guard, any more than we list every sailor on every ship, or every soldier in every regiment. The only ones who should be named in this article are those who somehow were the subject of secondary coverage, perhaps for rebellion or escape attempts, or who were notable for something other than being a POW. Edison (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the list of names?

message: The content of Battle of Bowmanville should be merged into this article. With reference to WP:MERGE, there is large overlap in the topics in the two articles, and duplication of content at Battle of Bowmanville that could be moved here. The resulting combined article would not be too long or unwieldy, since there is already a sub-section for the battle with much of the same content in the article here. --papageno (talk) 17:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: By accident, I found this article from "The Pittsburgh Press" from May 6, 1942. It mentions another escape attempt. Or is that one already listed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.171.108.130 (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional escape (attempt)?
Talk:Ionomer

message: I am sure that I am not the only one who finds Du Ponts advertisements on this article a little hard to swallow.  I am removing them - if someone wishes to purchase ionomers - they can google for them.  
CountNihilismus (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Du pont removal

message: The "average" person has no chance of comprehending all the jargon used in this article.  I will not elaborate on the poor sentence structure and grammar, except to say that this is a terribly written piece.  Speaking an an engineer (computer) - if I was a youngster trying to do some research, I would be completely "turned-off" by this article.  Having dealt with pseudo-intellectual snobbery my entire life, I am sad to report that it is still alive and well in academia, and apparently, here within Wikipedia also.  This should be, to the greatest extent possible, a site for the masses.  Articles like this undermine that goal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.39.86 (talk) 00:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Style
Talk:Sohaegeum

message: The following questions were added into the article:
:hanja: 四奚琴)
::What is the source for these hanja?
:So (hanja: 四) in sohaeheum means "four,"
::四 is "sa" in Korean, not "so." What is the source for this hanja/pronunciation? The online Korean dictionary gives "小" as the first character.
As a side note... User:Badagnani you seem to have been the person to both add the material, and then later add the questions about the material. Are you talking to yourself, or what? ;-) If you don't have a source for the material, and yourself question the validity of it, then why add it in the first place? --Maelwys (talk) 18:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not add the reference to the 四 character; I am questioning it as the online Korean etymology dictionary gives 小. Badagnani (talk) 18:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, my apologies I misread the diffs. I noticed that you'd added several of the hanja and done all the linking, so I didn't notice that somewhere in there that one symbol was already present and you just expanded on it. Nonetheless, the questions should go here instead of being inline. Hopefully the person that started the article can answer them here, or if they don't soon you'll have to remove them and update with whatever information we do have sources for, if not that. --Maelwys (talk) 18:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline questions from article 

message: By way of a wish list, it would be nice to be able to hear someone plunking on one of these things. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 15:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wish List
Talk:List of Shakespearean characters (L–Z)

message: I have split the article into two separate articles encompassing Characters with names from A-K and names from L-Z. I preserved the existing order of characters, and duplicated sources. I have also removed most double-redirects, sending redirects to the A-K article unless it's clear that a particular character from L-Z was intended. I also corrected the template to refer to both pages, and amended the Table of Contents to link between the two articles for easy navigation. As the article was ranked #14 on the list of longest articles in the main article space, it was a good candidate for a split. The history of the page is preserved at the A-K article. Best, ZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  18:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Split
Talk:1992 Davis Cup World Group

message: At the USA vs Sweden Semifinal (near the bottom), it seems to show .999999998 instead of 1  for the tie-break score. Some kind of glitch... It is fine now apparently, but editing that section, or even previewing it seems to make it mess up again. So be careful. The template seems fine and every other tie-break score is higher than 1 and is fine. So I don't know. GoldenGoose100 (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be OK now... Hopefully that section needs no further editing. ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 01:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States vs. Sweden  - Tie break seems to shows 0.999999998
Talk:Chief Oshkosh

message: This posting is wrong about several items.
Chief Oshkosh is not now and was never buried in Menominee Park.
There has always been controversy surrounding this as originally the Menominee Indians did not give the body of Chief Oshkosh to be buried in the park.  Also the body was exhumed in the 90's and the remains of the body that was given to the city of Oshkosh was returned to the Menominee Indians.
<ref>http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1499&dat=19260801&id=iZJQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=miEEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4401,3618124/ref>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upbm-rAYaaA&feature=youtube_gdata_player  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pack Fan Dave (talk • contribs) 16:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial 

message: http://oshkosh.pastperfect-online.com/20004cgi/mweb.exe?request=image;hex=P2002.30.jpg
This is the photo the Smithsonian has on file. Why the deliberate whitewashing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:92D2:BBFA:357C:C08F:D79B:D61D (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  That is not Chief Oshkosh
Talk:St V

message: This page has analogues in two other languages which are quite extensive. If more rationale for keeping it is needed, contact me. -Oreo Priest 18:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion

message: The Dutch wiki is the most extensive off all and is very high quality I think it should be translated into English  Jhowie_Nitnek 16:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translate the Dutch page 

message: Saint Verhaegen is the full name while St V is the shortened name. I think it would be better if the full name is used in the title.  Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page to Saint Verhaegen
Talk:HMS Malabar (1818)

message: Apparently Nicholas Condy painted (Title) "HMS Malabar leaving a harbour-Captain Sir W. Montague", signed N. Condy 1832. William Augustus Montagu took command of HMS Malabar in 1834 and remained on her until 1837 in the Mediterranean. So he may well have commissioned Nicholas Condy the year he assumed command? Can't find this painting though. Broichmore (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicholas Condy 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Edward Duncan_-_The_Explosion_of_the_United_States_Steam_Frigate_Missouri.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 4, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-06-04. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 15:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Marker (telecommunications)

message: In its current state, this document is not a description of a marker but of the use of a marker in some AT&T (aka Bell Sysem) equipment. As such, it is limited and not representaive of the concept. Telephony is a world wide concept and is not restricted to the technology developed by AT&T.?l
Computers are not limited to stored program devices. The example of Collosus which was used to break the Enigma codes is a good one. it is widely regarded as an early computer and was not a stored program computer. The comparison of the marker to a computr emphasizes its funtion and role.
:Certainly.  Kindly supply more information about markers worldwide.  Jim.henderson (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bell System
Talk:Multiple edges

message: "A planar graph remains planar if an edge is added between two vertices already joined by an edge; thus, adding multiple edges preserves planarity." Isn't this similar to how adding digon faces to a polyhedron doesn't make any difference to the polyhedron's external appearance? Double sharp (talk) 10:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Related to digons?

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Multiple edge(graph theory) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#Multiple edge(graph theory) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Multiple edge(graph theory)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Pico Canyon Oilfield

message: I've noticed that in this article, the word "Oilfield" is used in the title, but nowhere else. However, in the references and in the article, oil field is used much more, and is in the references. Does anyone think that we should move the article to a new title, or change the use of the word oilfield in the article? Kuro ♪ 22:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oilfields and Oil Fields 

message: dm (talk) 00:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I bumped it to start, but I actually think its b-class now, consensus says ....