lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Taking Over (Overkill album)

message: Since this is getting no responses at the WP:NOR noticeboard, I will re-post the issue here and then take it to whichever is the appropriate WP dispute resolution section. And so we begin:
User:Paranoid90 keeps adding a source which he insists is adequate proof of this album having sold a certain amount of copies. Currently, his addition to the article reads:
"As of 2011, Taking Over had sold over 100,000 copies in the U.S."
However, a simple browser search reveals no mention whatsoever of Taking Over within the source provided. A very fleeting mention of album sales is made at some point by the interviewee, who is a bandmember:
"How I could have sold over 100,000 units on Atlantic records and not received one penny!"
... but in context, these 100,000 units do not explicitly correspond to Taking Over. How could it, when the album itself is not even mentioned in any shape or form? Therefore I maintain that the source is NOT reliable in confirming such a definitive statement regarding album sales figures, and that I am correct in removing it. Nonetheless, User:Paranoid90 chooses to edit war over it rather than find a more reliable source. At my talk page he has put forth some half-assed rationale about record labels and timeframes, which he somehow expects other users to "know" in advance and even to disregard the content of the source. In his words, "The readers almost never care about the source, they just read it". Surely his grasp of WP:RS is lacking, and that he is violating both WP:OR and WP:SYNTH? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 04:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales figures
Talk:Fuck You (EP)

message: Is this just a ass case of random page-making or vandalism to an actual article? I have no idea what this is actually referring to, so I am frankly of no help. I want to propose this for deletion, if this is purely gibberish and not able to be reverted into anything worthwhile. Championpork (talk) 03:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?

message: Was the original by The Stiffs or Subhumans (Canadian band)? Maybe someone who has this album could find out from the inlay. -- Trevj (talk) 20:35, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover of  "Fuck You" 

message: This article should preferably use a photo of the original Fuck You EP, rather than Fuck You And Then Some, which has its own article. Joefromrandb (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Under the Influence (Overkill album)

message: overview section was POV, removed it Oderus 01:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Horrorscope (Overkill album)

message: Thanks for uploading :Image:1401.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the source specifying who owns the copyright to the file is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then  can be used to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags/Non-free. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Non-free content) then the image will be deleted 7 days after 12:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:1401.jpg]]
Talk:Hans Poelzig

message: Geschäftshaus (German Wiki) rather than 
*1912 Department store in Junkernstrasse, Breslau 
Xx236 09:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I didn't find any informations about these buildings. I live nearby and I don't think these ones ever existed:
* 1911 Grain silo and Roofed Marketplace in Luboń
--WhiteBlack (talk) 23:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation needed
Talk:W.F.O. (album)

message: So what does W.F.O. mean?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.133.169.157 (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  W.F.O. meaning?
Talk:Sim Wong Hoo

message: A lot more work is needed on this article.
I removed the following text which needs to be rewritten and probably better researched:
Under his leadership, Creative is not only in the sound card business but is also continuously diversifying into other related hardware production such DVD players, graphics cards, digital audio players, and Prodikeys.
Sim Wong Hoo won the "Best of CES" Consumer Electronic Show in 2004 in Las Vegas for his Zen Portable Media Centre, which was jointly developed by Creative and Microsoft. This product had won for its easy portability of digital music, video and images.
Troy88 09:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More work needed
Talk:El Alcázar

message: The article includes an external link to: "González, Félix Rodríguez. "Spanish Influence on English Word-Formation: The Suffix -Ista." American Speech, Vol. 70, No. 4. (Winter, 1995), pp. 421-429.Stable URL: <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-1283%28199524%2970%3A4%3C421%3ASIOEWT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q>". What's the use of having it here? I've tried to access to it but it seems to be restricted. MJGR 09:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link 
Talk:Opel Super 6

message: Is the name Super Six the correct one or should it be Super 6. Different sourcesgive different messages. --Dahlis 09:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Rshtuni

message: subordinate to the Adzruni. May be to Artsruni? Please, clear.--Irukan 09:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This name is the source of the name Rushdoony but I can't find a way to prove it.  Almost all Armenian surnames end in -ian, this being one of the very few exceptions, apparently because it's a very old name.  Google searching "Ռշտունի" (the Armenian form of Rshtuni) turns up only a few pages about Rousas Rushdoony, and I wouldn't feel comfortable linking to any of them and claiming that it's proof that the names are the same.  —Soap— 20:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rushdoony
Talk:Tourism (Roxette album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 17:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Do we need something like this?
92.71.60.61 (talk) 13:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Add map?
Talk:Baladas en Español

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 18:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: The article says this is a compilation album, and that the songs were recorded 1987-1996.
Were they actually recorded earlier, or is that a reference to the original songs only? I could not find anything that would suggest the Spanish language versions were published before "the compilation".
So it would be sort of a compilation, but also an album of new songs (if I'm correct). 91.154.188.185 (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Roxette discography has a note about the album: Baladas en español consists of re-recorded versions of twelve of their down-tempo singles and album tracks, translated into Spanish., so that indeed means these Spanish songs were recorded in 1996, not earlier. 188.238.62.21 (talk) 22:02, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Spanish vocals were recorded in 1996, but no new music was recorded for this album—"No sé si es amor" backing track is the same as "It Must Have Been Love (Christmas for the Broken Hearted)", which was recorded in 1987; "Quiero ser como tú" backing track was recorded in August 1995. The music on these "Spanish versions" is the same as the original English versions. Hence "1987–1996". It would be incorrect to say the entire album was recorded in 1996, since the music was recorded much, much earlier. Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that how all other-language versions are done? I thought that, while the music background is already existing, it would be used as a background when recording, so actually the whole songs would be recorded. 91.154.188.185 (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, I'm not aware of any other best of-type compilation albums recorded in a different language. I know people like Shakira have recorded Spanish songs and translated them into English. Maybe some K-pop artists have also recorded Japanese versions of songs to try and break Japan/J-pop artists recorded in Korean, etc., but I can't think of any other albums done like this. And I don't think using the old music counts as a "new recording". Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  compilation album?
Category talk:Literary hoaxes

message: What is a literary hoax?  The fabrication of history? (of which we have plenty of other articles), or a faked autobiography? (the Helen Dominenko story), or plagarism?
Kransky 10:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: where is this list going?

message: I've been here for days clicking the little plus signs under the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" subcategory.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.252.242.82 (talk) 16:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Never ending maze of sublinks
Talk:EXist

message: The maintenance template (tag) on this page states, "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page." As a member of the eXist open source community, I have reviewed the current page and find no cause for concern. There are no boastful claims - all information on the page is purely descriptive. I would request that the tag be removed. Or there are any concerns with the content? Joewiz (talk) 20:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Rehabilitating this page
Talk:Tara Brooch

message: The image on this article had been deleted, so I have linked to a PD image from 1896 until we can find a better one. - PKM 17:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Throughly enjoyed a first read-through of this. A few thoughts, which I shall add to as I revisit over the weekend:
* Present location and recent BM conservation/cleaning - these conclude the lead, but I can’t see then referenced in the body. Do we need a section (or sub-section of the Discovery section) which references NM Ireland and the BM’s work?
* Dating - “trumpet spiral” lost me, and I see you’ve red-linked it. Perhaps a footnote, until we have an article? This is a nice image,  anything from the Book of Durrow that could be used?
* Description: Terminals - final sentence of first para. “In red and blue that adapt Germanic…techniques”. Is it “adapt” or “adopt”? Either could make sense but only one is probably right! 
* Condition - “… has sustained substantial losses since.” This piques the reader’s interest, or it did mine! Is there any more information on how the, rather scandalous, damage occurred after discovery? Was it deliberate, e.g. bits removed for separate, illicit?, sale, or accidental?
* 19th century reception - this is interesting, . Waterhouse obviously exhibited his copies, along with the original, at the Great Exhibition and the V&A bought one.
KJP1 (talk) 17:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Have been researching these, and have resolutions; on JSTOR - "The Original Appearance of the Tara Brooch" (ie what was lost when) & "The Finding of the Tara Brooch", neither of which are kind to mr. Waterhouse. Ceoil (talk) 02:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

text: ps: The damage and losses post rediscovery will be a whole section; we have drawings and photographs from 1850 to 1899, that track the whole sorry saga. It's actually breathtakingly pitiful.  Hold on!! Ceoil (talk) 02:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts
Talk:All Nepal Trade Union Congress

message: The intepretation given at GEFONT website that NIWU was the continuation of ANTUC, is a POV on behalf of the then CPN(ML). There is no direct link between the two organizations, and certainly there are/were other trade unions claiming to represent the heritage of the original ANTUC. There is a current organization holding the name, namely the trade union of CPN(UC-M). --Soman 10:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Olof Skötkonung

message: The disambiguation page has him as St Olaf of Sweden, as does this site.  Is this enough for it to be mentioned in the article? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:44, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Saint" 

message: I have looked at the material you've added on Olof's supposed sainthood, and I'm not impressed. Some of the references are to blogs and the likes, which are not suitably reliable. One source claims that he was christened by Ansgar, which is patently false as there was a gap of over a hundred years between them. Except for one of the references - that to katolsk.no, the Catholic church in Norway -, not one of them gives any further reference to anything more than a vague "legend". Katolsk.no does appear to have attempted to do some wider reading, and even if parts of what it writes on the life of Olof is rather uncritical, it does explicitly deny that Olof was martyred. It should also be noted that Wikipedia is among the sources it lists, so I would not take it too seriously.
It should also be noted that Olof is not noted as a saint in Svenskt Biografiskt lexikon, the first place one should look when doing any sort of serious biographical work on historical swedes. 
This leads me to conclude that the only legend of Olof seems to be one that lives on internet pages. If Olof is venerated as a saint somewhere, a source that talks about specifics would be far more compelling than lists of saint, compiled more to be long and impressive than with serious scholarship in mind. 
Andejons (talk) 06:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sainthood"
Talk:Blue Mountains panther

message: Is there some source for the "Penrith Panther" claim, or is that just someone here linking the football club to the phantom cat, because Penrith is adsjacent to the Blue Mountains? 
Same goes for the safari park claim. As far as I can recall, Bullens Lion Safari at Wallachia (which is the safari park referred to) had lots of lions, but no panthers. Can someone confirm this? --Gene_poole 01:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I've just noticed the edit warring on this article and did some searching and have found some sources.
*NSW: Animal expert viewing footage of black panther aap 10 May 2001
*NSW: Still no confirmation of Blue Mountains panther aap 15 May 2001
*Hunt for the black panther The Sun-Herald 27 February 2005
*Australian Panther Research - N.S.W Government Report 
*'Black Cat' identification NSW Department of Primary Industries
*Panther may be no urban myth, says Premier Sydney Morning Herald 19th September 2008
*Premier's panther 'is wild goose chase' The Australian 20th September 2008
*Panther sightings in the Macarthur area Macarthur Chronicle 13th October 2008
I'm sure there are more sources out there but most of them are unlikely to be online. Bidgee (talk) 23:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some helpful sources 

message: Please remember that each specific claim within a Wikipedia article must be cited to a specific reliable source. Repeated insertion of unsourced material constitutes vandalism. 
An editor has suggested that claims within the article are supported by sources listed
* List of media articles concerning the phantom big cat phenomenon in New South Wales and Victoria.
Editors interested in adding material to the are encouraged to review this list as a potential resource for reliably sourced material. Please make sure that sources used to back claims within the article meet our guidelines for sources: WP:RS.
-- The Red Pen of Doom 16:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources - again 
Talk:La Congolaise

message: Neither of the external links took me to anyplace appropriate. Can we remove them? Svyatoslav (talk) 06:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Until September 15, the fourth line of the refrain was Tukala bonso mika mya mbwa, but this revision shows that an unknown editor added PIZZA, and no one noticed until now. I will fix this. --Mickey Mystique (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  PIZZA 
Talk:La Dessalinienne

message: This is entirely lyrics, and should be in Wikisource, not Wikipedia. --70.187.197.103 (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: The lyrics chart form are virtually unreadable, at least in my browser. The narrow columns require arbitrary line breaks, and since the translations don't align, the format adds no information. The earlier version, with four entire sections of lyrics, had its own problems, but this seems like a step backward to me. Cnilep (talk) 03:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart illegible 
Talk:Jean Claude Saint-Venant

message: #REDIRECT Talk:Adhémar Jean Claude Barré de Saint-Venant
this guy needs to be in here, just has no english article, and Im not one for writing it up.
see the french wikipedia version  at fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint-Venant -
http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint-Venant&prev=/search%3Fq%3DSaint%2BVenant%26hl%3Den%26hs%3DBa8%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official
: Actually the content of this article should be merged with the larger article Adhémar Jean Claude Barré de Saint-Venant.  MCalamari 23:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lamkin

message: Should the unknown word neer be:
* near ?
* never ?
* ne'er (contraction of never) ?
Tabletop (talk) 10:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  neer? 

message: Shep Ginandes sings it as "Bolakins" on "Shep Ginandes Sings Folk Songs", Electra 133.76.247.165.2 (talk) 04:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add to "Performances"
Talk:Land of the Free (anthem)

message: The first paragraph in "History and criticism" refers to a mononymic individual named "Bliss" ("Upon the outbreak of the First World War, Bliss enlisted in the British West Indies Regiment"), but there is no further reference to any individuals named (in any part) Bliss throughout. What's up with that? Maxs4269 (talk) 03:59, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is Bliss?

message: Why are the lyrics posted on the page a second time? They're already there!--Aaronhumes 17:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Open-book management

message: I just listened to an interview on BBC World Service. Very interesting. Bu I have a serious question - How is this different from Marxism?Self-Described Seabhcán 10:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard the interview, too. From what I understand, Marxian economics seeks to limit the surplus value: the gap between the value a worker produces and what he is paid. Open book management hands the capitalist hat to the employees, letting them decide whether to close the gap today or produce a profit to ensure future competitiveness. It's (temporarily) lovely for the workers and consumers if producers  sold things for exactly the cost it takes to make it, but nobody's going to loan a company the money it takes to grow or invent if they don't expect some kind of return. I would say open books mgmt owes a little to Marxism, but is well within the real-world limits of a market economy. Tafinucane 22:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Since this metodology is not about "book management which is open" but about "management by open book", the correct term would be "Open-Book Management". Since this is also the term the author uses in the referenced links, I'm moving this article. clacke 16:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open-Book Management 

message: "Employers are challenged to move the numbers in a direction that improves the company"
should that be Employees?
Whoever wrote this has used company and employees and this is the first time use of employers and plural at that. So I suspect a spello. A rather important one.Robotics1 13:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spello?
Talk:Largo al factotum

message: Just a thought that maybe the better translation of 'biglietto' might be BILL rather than 'note' - would that be correct? 
And similarly that 'factotum' in English could be DOGSBODY.
Alan - a proper Figaro!
Cheers! xD  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.253.229 (talk) 17:47, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

message: Factotum should be translated as polymath? I'm hesitant to change the content of the page without input from the community, any thoughts? (The only source I can find is http://the-difference-between.com/polymath/factotum , which says that polymath is related to knowledge while factotum is related to activity)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.97.185.224 (talk) 05:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: "Factotum" should not be translated as "polymath". The meanings given at wikt:factotum are correct. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  factotum as polymath? 

message: The sheet music on this page incorrectly treats -go and al as separate syllables. In the original, these two are elided, so they share the note D. Conversely, the -to- syllable should get both the C and D slurred together. Also, Italian hyphenation rules prescribe fa-cto-tum instead of fac-to-tum. Fortunately, this very example is literally in the Lilypond manual:
\relative {\clef "bass" \key c \major \time 6/8 c'4.~ 8 d b | c8( d) b c d b | c8 } \addlyrics { Lar -- go_al fa -- | cto -- tum del -- la cit -- | tà } 85.148.65.161 (talk) 14:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect text setting in music example
Talk:Laura (Scissor Sisters song)

message: I don't have time at the moment to research this, but I think I heard that the narrator is meant to be George W. Bush. Omphaloscope talk 18:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laura = Laura Bush? 
Talk:Lazy (Suede song)

message: Given the fact that there are other songs with the title "Lazy," presumably added following the creation of this article, I suggest just moving this article to Lazy (Suede song) and Lazy (song) redirecting to the disambiguation page. The {about} tag can remain as is. The contents of the article I'll leave to everyone else to discuss. What does everyone else say to the proposal? KirkCliff2 (talk) 15:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Move?
Talk:Lazybones (song)

message: In 2019 I removed this charming anecdote because it has needed a citatino for SEVEN YEARS! ... and I can't find one online, except a couple that scrape this article. 
According to Carmichael, in an interview, Mercer came into Carmichael’s apartment in New York one day and saw Hoagy “snoozin’” on his couch.  Mercer said, “Hoag, I’m gonna write a song called ‘Lazy Bones’.”  Carmichael said, “Well, let’s get at it.”  They went over to Hoagy’s piano, Johnny said the first line and Hoagy started playing a melody.  The song was done in twenty minutes.  Both men agreed on the time in separate interviews.
- DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anecdote about fast writing