lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mangue bit

message: I changed the title of the article to 'Mangue Beat'. Since the last  title, 'MangueBit', was an incorrect spelling of the name of the movement.
I'm really affraid you're wrong! MangueBit is the correct name and MangueBeat is the most commom mispelling.
This is a very very commom error! There's no need for us to propagate it!
::For more info, try  this or this (both in Portuguese, sorry). --Abu Badali 23:39, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
::Look let´s not get hot in this discussion (there´s more on the talk page than on the article page), but there are 21,000 google hits for mangue beat, and only 3000 for mangue bit, and 20 for manguebit--Alexandre Van de Sande 02:05, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You´re right. let´s keep manguebit. I did some research, expanded tha article a bit and added this discussion to it.--Alexandre Van de Sande 02:53, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Much later and external links are still dead. I would love to read the manifesto em qualquer lenguaje! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.187.170.125 (talk) 03:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I'm not really familiar with the source policy, so bear with me. Both the book listed under references mentions the MangueBit genre and the external links provide additional info. I'll try to replace the dead link, as it seems the original website of the movement went offline a few years ago. tellarin (talk) 04:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced?
Talk:Crossbar latch

message: The revised version is being written at Crossbar_latch/Temp.
Umm, what's the point of that? Keenan Pepper 03:28, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: Although Wikipedia:Reliable_source_examples#Are_patents_reliable_sources.3F is not a policy, I've tagged the article with self-published. I couldn't workout if the external links are press releases or articles, so feel free to remove this tag if they are articles, and work them into the article. Widefox; talk 12:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Ebisu, Shibuya

message: Don't merge with Tokyo --- that article's already too long, and cannot accommodate all the neighborhoods. If it's necessary to merge it with anything, Shibuya would be a better candidate. Fg2 01:51, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
:also object to merging with toyko.  too small of a neighborhood to warrant its own section in the tokyo article, however, too large of a neighborhood to not have.  suggest Wikipedia:Stub.
::if no one objects to the removal from merging, i propose the removal of the notice 69.227.162.53 04:27, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old merge
Talk:Regression analysis

message: Can we replace the textbook jargon "in which a researcher" (2nd sentence of the article, added 13 October 2019) with less restrictive wording? --109.41.129.26 (talk) 06:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to "in which one finds ...". Perhaps someone will argue that "one" is too broad - but so is "a researcher", really. Basically, it's a way to avoid the passive voice (which imho might be the best solution, really).--Nø (talk) 10:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Conlon

message: From the page: 
″The name may be derived from two Irish Gaelic words "Con" (the genitive case of Cú, meaning "hound") and "Lón" meaning lion - thereby implying a person who has the characteristics of a lion born of a hound - strength and speed.
Would love to see this cited, not least as proof of lions in 13th C. Ireland, but also as "lón" means "lunch" in Irish, whereupon this name would more closely translate as 'hotdog'. More likely, it's neither lion from a dog nor lunch from a dog, but rather is speculative and should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.239.200.154 (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:History of the Vatican City

message: When was this article published? What volume number is it, if there is one? I need to cite this under MLA formatting. Help me out
Ahm, the Catholic Church was somewhat in league with the Nazies and Fascists, and yet there is no mention of it in here. Why? 147.91.1.41 18:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

message: In spite of its name, the article as it stood was not about Vatican City, which came into existence only in 1929, but about the Holy See or the Papacy.  Lima 11:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged with History of the Papacy
Talk:Nocturnal enuresis

message: I've archived the 2008 discussions. Wshallwshall (talk) 19:20, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Archived old content

message: There have been two additions of Safflower oil to the disputed-causes section. Both times the addition has come from an anonymous user and both additions have lacked a citation.
After searching again for any supporting evidence for Safflower oil causing bedwetting, I still find nothing to support this addition. As a result, I've again removed the item. (See Wikipedia:Verifiability )
If anyone wishes to restore this, I would request that he/she do so from a logged in account and add a real reference. (Just putting citation needed isn't enough.)
Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability before trying to restore this item.
Wshallwshall (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safflower Oil, verifiability 

message: Her biography, The Bedwetter, while not primarily about her bedwetting, is probably one of the few memoirs to be this self revealing. I think at least a See Also link would be appropriate. I dont think it deserves a section.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sarah Silverman

message: "Bedwetting does not indicate a greater possibility of being a sociopath, as long as caregivers do not cause trauma by shaming or punishing a bedwetting child." To quote the article. So as written, does this indicate mistreatment by a caregiver to a bed wetter for bedwetting will cause them to become a sociopath? That's what it seems. That info should be sourced.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 09:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Psychiatry  frequently makes these "misstakes" as part of their regular disinformation. Should be noted that it is also just one person from 1963 that probably didnt even raise kids..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E9:710:4E00:A45F:67B7:7392:3755 (talk) 10:25, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sociopathy 

message: This section includes the sentence "Boys and girls are three times more likely to wet the bed than girls and boys." This is nonsense, surely?
46.208.76.218 (talk) 19:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epidemiology 

message: "Bedwetting is the most common childhood complaint."
Do people agree this sentence needs expanding or explaining? To me, a layperson, it is not at all clear. Who is complaining? Are we comparing all childhood medical issues; all childhood issues, period; what?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7C:5690:A000:2527:5EA6:305A:D594 (talk) 23:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question
Talk:Ga language

message: I cannot access ethnologue as it is paywalled, but the quoted figure of 8.5 million native Ga speakers is very obviously inaccurate. Almost all other sources that I could find give figures around 750 thousand, even Languages of Ghana states that Ga has 745,000 native speakers, citing Ethnologue (2019).
Changing the number to 745000 for this reason.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lfgteam (talk • contribs) 19:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate native speaker count

message: The Ga Language article was very short so I decided to add a section on the Ga alphabet. Will add some form of pronunciation guide later. After that I'll put up a short grammar of the language.
Lordan 04:36, 2005 Feb 3 (UTC)
:Cool, I'm looking forward to it!  — mark ✎ 13:07, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Recently the following was added to both this article and Gbe languages. I have pulled it out of both articles so that we can discuss it here first. 
:A CORRECTION --- The Dangme, or Ga-Dangme, language/or language family (which should be considered as two languages ---- 1.Ga and 2.Adangbe/or 2.Ga-Adangbe), is found in Southeastern Ghana, it is usually classified and considered as a part of the Kwa language family.  This misclassification is possibly due to the fact that the language has undergone some changes due to the significant amount of influence from the more populous and well settled Kwa speakers within the area now known as Ghana -- primarily the Akan speakers.  Ga-Adangme, or as the tribesmen themselves refer to as Adangbe -- Adan-[GBE] or Ga-Adangbe -- Ga-Adan-[GBE], is in essence should be considered a part of the [GBE] language family and in reality related to the Fongbe, Ajagbe, and Gengbe languages listed above.  In addition, it is well known amongst the tribe and the people of Ghana that the Ga-Adangbes settled in the Accra coastal plains centuries ago, migrating along the West African coast westward from neighboring Togo where the gbe speakers are found.  Some historians even suggest that proto-Ga-Adangbes migrated from as far as Ile-Ife, an old Yoruban city state.
(end of pulled-out section).
Response. In the books and articles cited in Gbe languages, I did not come across this theory, and obviously the mere coincidence in sound of the language names isn't going to be the kind of evidence such a theory needs. Wikipedia is not the place for original research. On a sidenote, the Gbe languages are classified as Kwa, too, so the languages are indeed distantly related. As far as I know, no African linguist has claimed that Ga-Dangme should be considered one a Gbe language. — mark ✎ 18:43, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification / relation to Gbe 

message: If you are a native speaker of Ga then you can help translate this template into your own language:
 Edit
--Amazonien (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ga language template

message: How are you 2600:1700:47F9:B040:CC91:F673:86EE:5427 (talk) 14:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are you
Talk:Merovingian (The Matrix)

message: Inductive reasoning is about cause and effect. Deductive reasoning is about logic. While inductive reasoning does grant one "foresight" of a kind (e.g. the sun will rise tomorrow) so does cause and effect - since they are the same thing, here. Fish-Face (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hopefully Merv now has enough fleshing out on his page, so to speak, without too much speculation that isn't grounded by a point of dialogue or action in the movie series. We'll never really know, but I feel most strongly of the possibility that Merv is as old, if not older, than the Oracle and was a significant element in the early Matrix versions. You would think that Merv would be deleted by Agents if he had no purpose--so logicially he DOES serve a purpose in the Matrix of 'today'. Or, he has amassed so much power and has his hooks in so many elements of the system that removing him (much less finding him) would do more harm than good. I may have to take up The Matrix Online just to see what ol' Merv is up to. Spencerian 00:56, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's it gonna be, Merv? 

message: "Another theory is based on the number-play seen throughout the trilogy (i.e. Trinity is first seen in room 303, and Neo in room 101): The Merovingian's restaurant is named "Le Vrai" (which means "The Real" in French), and the initials "LV" appear on many of its walls. However, "LV" is also Roman numerals for "55", which given the previous number-play scheme could refer to "5". The Architect told Neo that there had been 5 "Ones" before Neo. Also, when the Merovingian is first seen at his table, he has 5 glasses at his seat, while Persephone (perhaps his analog of Trinity) has three chocolates on her plate."
Way too stretched and obscure for an encyclopedia. I'm tired of all this Matrix numerology speculation. - 84.237.120.114 16:58, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goodness... 

message: *The Merovingian was named for the Merovingian dynasty of Frankish kings who believed themselves to be descendents of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene, and bearers of the Holy Grail.
:Does anyone have a cite for that that isn't from The DaVinci Code? --24.21.101.75 06:28, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: DaVinci Code

message: there isnt one  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.26.131.178 (talk) 03:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  summary 

message: I didn't even know his name was Merovingian, he's just "the Frenchman" to me. A "the Frenchman" redirect page would be useful or a link on the "Frenchman" page  86.132.37.159 (talk) 20:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request a redirect page (or similar) from "the Frenchman" 

message: This character does not demonstrate any notability to the wider world - there is a lack of critique of his role in the films and he doesn't seem to be important enough to have his own article.  --110.20.234.69 (talk) 22:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion rationale
Talk:Fixed-point theorems in infinite-dimensional spaces

message: How or why does Ryll-Nardzewski subsume Kakutani? The former is about fixed points of maps, the latter about fixed points of correspondences. AxelBoldt 05:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, even in the case of maps, Ryll-Nardzewski does not, as is, subsume Kakutani; indeed, Kakutani is about all compact convex sets in a locally convex (Hausdorff) TVS, whilst Ryll-Nardzewski is only for the weakly compact in a normed space under isometries. The difference is huge (and accounts for the whole notion of amenable groups).  I'll delete the wrong statement.128.178.14.162 (talk) 07:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ryll-Nardzewski subsumes Kakutani? 

message: In the statement, it is said that the image should be countably compact. But we are in a Banach space here, which is a metric space. In a metric space, the notion of countable compactness is equivalent to the notion of compactness. Right? So it's enough to say that the image should be compact.  /Janzon
:Yes, I thought that was strange too - nobody talks about "countably compact" sets in a metric space (except to point out that they are just the compact sets). So I've changed it. --Zundark 17:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The statement of Schauder's Fixed Point Theorem
Talk:Líneas Aéreas Azteca

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ♠Vami_IV†♠ 08:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Arcology

message: What does the statement that Wright assumes a more rigid democracy than the US actually has actually mean? Sethian (talk) 13:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A possible addition to the culture sections are the massive multi-level 1-10 billion people cited in Warhammer 40k. I do recognize that it does harm the environment and therefore might not be mentioned. Either way a mention might be helpful XxyxX15 (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd need a secondary source per WP:IPCV. DonIago (talk) 18:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obscure
Talk:Jurisdiction in rem

message: This might better be moved to the List of Latin phrases and this page replaced with a #redirect.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BenFrantzDale (talk • contribs) 05:37, 3 February 2005  (UTC)
:I disagree. If it's going to be merged with anything it should be moved to a larger article about jurisdiction rather than the too-general list of Latin phrases. But I think it's fine where it is, too. Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 20:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree as well. It seems fine where it is. Butnotthehippo 02:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fairy Queen (disambiguation)

message: Could use a picture Jm51 05:39, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: MOS:DAB advises to use short lists of blue links for disambiguation pages. In practice they do not have illustrations. 69.115.42.244 (talk) 12:10, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image needed

message: Is there any evidence this character is from folklore? I have heard stories incorporating a Fairy Queen but all of them post-date Spenser's poem. -- Securiger 08:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folklore?? 

message: Regarding the 23:35, 25 July 2008  edit, it looks like I replaced this article with the Blue Angels article text. However, this is not what I was trying to do; this is apparently part of a bug that was being discussed on the Wikipedia Village Pump (technical). A little bit more detail, a passage (in italics) copied from over there:
:Just to clarify that something very weird is happening, here is what happened: I attempted to add a handful of words to the 02:50, 13 July 2008 revision  to get the 23:35, 25 July 2008 revision ; if you look at the reported page byte sizes, 874 and 901, they back up that this is what happened (901 bytes is far, far smaller than the Blue Angels article). However, if you look at the diff  or the revision , it looks like I overwrote the Fairy Queen article with the Blue Angels article, which is not what I did!
—Lowellian (reply) 09:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mediawiki bug

message: I propose expanding this into a primary topic article on the folkloric (or popular media) archtype, with the remaining senses going to a "foo (disambiguaiton)" page. Any objections or other ideas? bd2412 T 14:30, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-disambiguation proposal
Talk:Background (journalism)

message: I put a suggestion that we merge this to News source it seems a good heading underwhich all this article would fit and it would help this material to develop. In addtion, I placed the journalism template here as well. I hope none of this seems persumtive or anything. Cheers, Calicocat 08:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting a merge
Talk:Reba McEntire

message: Noticed multiple references to reviews published on AllMusic.com within the timeline. AllMusic was not founded until 1991, yet the article references modern AllMusic reviews multiple times within the Music Career section from 1976-1990, e.g.: 
"It was followed by the low-charting Billboard country singles "(There's Nothing Like the Love) Between a Woman and Man" and "Glad I Waited Just for You". Mercury issued her self-titled debut album in 1977. In his album review, Greg Adams of AllMusic compared it to the country crossover style of Barbara Mandrell and Tammy Wynette."
The issue is that the article flips back and forth between referencing AllMusic reviews (that were written years after the album/single's release) and reception at the time of release, such as Billboard charts and RIAA certification. The aforementioned section, prior to AllMusic's creation, references AllMusic three times, but only one other critical reception (a Billboard article from 1984, mentioned in reference to My Kind of Country). 
The inclusion of the AllMusic reviews within the timeline is confusing/misleading, especially since they are most of the critical commentary included in the timeline prior to 1990. The implication here is that reviewers on AllMusic form the critical consensus of the era the singles/albums were released in, which they could not have been. It may be beneficial to add a 'Critical Reception' section or equivalent, or altenatively supplement with additional reviews of the time. I've added reception from a 1984 UPI article, will look for more reviews from the time period.  IJF99 (talk) 04:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  AllMusic reviews in the timeline 

message: This is a very well written article with a well done narrative form, but the section in my heading appears a bit too much like a list and could be made to better flow as part of the larger narrative. 47.12.225.19 (talk) 05:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Since 2011: Brief television return and current projects" Section 

message: Article mentions death of Reba McEntire in a few places. Verification needed. Sugandh Shashwat 19:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death?
Category talk:Pediatrics

message: Most of the articles in this category were originally in Category:Paediatrics but on December 28, 2004, that category was listed for renaming to this category. The consensus was to rename. The discussion from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion follows. RedWolf 06:02, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
----
Main article is at pediatrics. There's currently a soft-redirect from :Category:Pediatrics. A spelling convention should be chosen. As writing the article was likely a bigger task than creating the category, I vote that we conform to the article naming, and move Paediatrics to Pediatrics, leaving a soft-redirect in place, as it is now, but on the opposite article. — grendel|khan 03:10, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
*Keep, Wikipedia accepts both International and American spelling. - SimonP 20:04, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
*Rename to align with article name. --ssd 15:31, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Paediatrics
Talk:Coupe roadster

message: I've moved this article from Coupe Roadster for two reasons:
# Coupe roadster follows the Wikipedia naming convention, and
# A discussion here indicates that the name isn't specific to Benz.  It thus should fall into the same naming category as the coupe convertible.
--Milkmandan 06:03, 2005 Feb 3 (UTC)
:Good idea. I think that at the time of writing on GoFlyi's talk page, I intended to move it. I can't remember why I didn't do it though. SamH|Talk 09:40, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Merging roadster et al for a centralised discussion around merging all the roadster-related articles. Zunaid©® 19:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging roadster et al