lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bransford

message: This article is a flagrant wholsale copying by 6.170.112.210 from a respected known source. The source and should only  be quoted in  very  minimal  portions, or completely  rewritten. The Wiki  instruction  is clear enough:'''
Do not copy text from other websites without a GFDL-compatible license. It will be deleted.  The article has been reverted to  its original  stub  status--Kudpung (talk) 02:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copying
Talk:Brantham

message: In the sentence;
Brantham was the central hub of East Anglia in the Early Devonian peroid, with many people and dinosaurs all over the world meeting annual on Christmas day for celebrations and a pub lunch in the local pub
Why does the word dinosaurs appear? Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 14:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the word dinosaurs in this article
Talk:Branthwaite

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Braunston-in-Rutland

message: The pub claims itself to be "the oldest pub in the county of Rutland" here: . Are any of these other sources good enough to support such a claim: , , . Even if the claim cannot be proven, is the claim not notable in itself? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue Ball 
Talk:Northern Triangle temperate forests

message: What kind of tree or plant is Callophylus spp.? I can not find any information about any plant named Callophylus. If it is a misspelling, the closest name is a species of red algae, so I doubt it is a misspelling. Is it an outdated name perhaps? RhinoMind (talk) 20:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Callophylus spp. ?
Talk:Braydon Side

message: Braydon Side is not a Wiltshire village. There's a tiny place of about two or three farms in Brinkworth called Braydonside, but it isn't a village. Dzw49 (talk) 02:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated from village to hamlet. Wire723 (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Category
Talk:Brayford

message: The articles about Brayfordhill and Brayford appear to be about the same place. Do we need both?— Rod talk 16:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I will do the merger.--NHSavage (talk) 21:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Until 1974 Brayford was a hamlet in the parish of Charles. Now Charles is a hamlet in the vicinity of Brayford which is a civil parish in North Devon. According to to Wikipedia article on Charles it is now in the parish of East Buckland. Is there an explanation of these changes somewhere in Wikipedia?
The Brayford website provides no history.
--Oldontarian (talk) 20:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brayford and Charles
Talk:Braystones

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Ambrose Palmer

message: Whilst I understand that the newspaper articles tend to indicate a 1911 birth, the work done by the AFL historians is generally a lot more than newspaper reporters - and there are some reports of the day that match a 1910 birthday.(http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article181683196 and http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article4241941, although I also found some that match a 1911 birthyear - http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/183001637)  The absolute proof, however, is that if you search for an Ambrose Palmer with a 1909-1910 range at the Victorian BDM registration webstie, you find 1 record, but none with a 1911-1912 year range. The-Pope (talk) 04:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons for fixing birthday as 1910
Talk:Portugal national under-21 football team

message: can anyone add an updated roster? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benficadc13 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Roster

message: Is there a reason that the Youth World Cup isn't discussed in this article? matt91486 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Youth World Cup
Talk:Tim Lopes (journalist)

message: March, 2001: an investigative jornalist, named Tim Lopes, is killed by a traficant(traffic) group in Complexo do Alemão, an enormous slump located in Brazilian State of Rio de Janeiro. Working to Rede Globo de Televisão, the Brazilian greatest media group, Lopes death brings panic, polemic and mobilizacion to Rio´s society and its police departments – result: few days after the crime, Elias Maluco, one of the biggest dealer of the State, and murderer of Lopes, was catched. In chains, without shirt and hurted, Maluco was exposed by the contradictory feelings of the carioca´s society, mixing fear, anger and a morbid curiosity. More: in aproximatly two years, the murderer was condemned to more than 30 years in jail – a record by the slow brasilian justice system. A good combinacion of people and media mobilization made the diference, and State security sistem played its role.
But in the same night another guy was murdered by the same group, and his body was burned besides Tim Lopes’. The victim was probably Marcelo Souza, a 25 years old nordestino. Married, evangelic, and well-known as a simple and prestative guy, Marcelo was accused by his own brother as guilty in a young girl´s rape, and was killed by Elias Maluco´s gang. His bones are sleeping in the Legal Medicine Institut of Rio de Janeiro´s Police. The murderers of Tim Lopes, were sent to jail, but not because of Marcelo´s death – to Justice, this is an incomplete case, among the one hundred thousand other incomplete cases in Rio´s Police Department.
189.27.242.88
aguiar07@gmail.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.27.242.88 (talk) 04:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Here in Brazil, we (brazilians) say and write micro-ondas (microwaves) when we actually want to refer to the forno de micro-ondas (microwave oven)micro-ondas at WordReference dot com portuguese-english dictionary. Retrieved 2013-07-12.micro-onda at Multidictionary Michaelis-UOL. Retrieved 2013-07-12.. Thus, in such circumstance (a brazilian referring to the oven, not the waves), "micro-ondas" and "forno de micro-ondas" are synonyms.
Example:
:*Original sentence : "Acho que vou comprar um micro-ondas."
:*Literal translation : "I think I'll buy a microwaves."
:*Contextualized translation  "I think I'll buy a microwave oven."
* Before the 1990's PLOA, the correct spelling was microondas. But nowadays, due to that PLOA, the correct spelling is micro-ondas, because the new rule states that two identical vowels can't stay together in the same word: they must be separated by a hyphen(in Portuguese) Hyphenation after the 1990's PLOA at Brasil Escola. Retrieved 2013-07-12..►[Sampayu] 22:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthography: micro-ondas x microondas.
Talk:Richard B. Sanders

message: Dummy grenades?  This article is a joke, written by a left wing liberal.  Now I know who I am voting for.  Thank you.  Richard Sandars has my vote!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.203.110 (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it really helped.  68.227.163.169 (talk) 04:55, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Metric map

message: By moving this page from Short map to Metric map, User:Wlod has made this article incoherent. "Strictly short" now appears out of the blue. User:Wlod has also added 3 references to his own work, for this completely elementary and mathematically omnipresent concept. Short map might be the standard terminology in certain textbooks; for operators on normed spaces, the term "contraction" is standard. --Mathsci 04:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's standard to refer to the pioneering papers rather than to the papers written some 20-30 and more years later. Also, the name  short  is arbitrary, while  metric maps  is in the spirit of the theory of metric spaces and of theory of categories. Well, "strictly short" should be consistently changed to "strictly metric". -- Wlod 08:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Now it is coherent. Also, I removed the later references. I still supply 2 since the first one is from a  journal which is not on shelves of many libraries. -- Wlod 08:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately this is WP:OR; you have not provided any sources to show that this terminology is used by anybody but yourself, nor that it is generally accepted. WP is about verifiable facts not about your own personal view of mathematical truth. You did not invent this concept and you are likely to get into trouble if you claim you did. Please stop promoting yourself on WP. --Mathsci 16:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ill-advised page move
Talk:Don't Let the Pigeon Stay Up Late!

message: Should this article just be about the book?  As it now stands it has a lot of words about the series and the main character's appearences in other books.  Shouldn't this stuff be in the author article? I propose to remove this info and move it (as appropriate) to Mo Willems.  Comments? Coolabahapple (talk) 11:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, now create a wikipedia article on The Pigeon Will Ride the Rollercoaster on September 6th. 74.74.128.248 (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article about book?
Talk:USS Holland (AS-32)

message: Since original research is not admissible, I'll just put this here.  I went to Mare Island Naval Shipyard (decomissioned) yesterday, and saw the Holland there, fenced off in one of their old dry docks.  Looking a little rusty, but you could see a shadow of its former utilitarian nature.  If I had a submarine, I would definitely take it to the USS Holland for repair! Scalveg (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

message: This article says "USS Holland (AS-32) was a submarine tender launched by the Ingalls Shipbuilding Company in Pascagoula, Mississippi on 19 January 1963. The first ever built specifically to service Fleet Ballistic Missile submarines (SSBNs) ..."
A similar article says "USS Hunley (AS-31) was a submarine tender of the United States Navy launched on 28 September 1961 and commissioned 16 June 1962. The Hunley was designed to tend most of the long-term requirements of the Polaris Class of submarines."
The Holland was commissioned on 7 September 1963, while the Hunley was commissioned on 16 June 1962.
Doesn't that make the Hunley first? TCav (talk) 01:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I see the confusion. The Hunley article states, "The Hunley was designed to tend most of the long-term requirements of the Polaris Class of submarines." While the Holland article states,"The first ever built specifically to service Fleet Ballistic Missile submarines (SSBNs) ..." The difference is whether they service Polaris or FBMs. MR2David (talk) 22:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've been on both the Hunley and the Holland. They are (were) identical for all intents and purposes. As for the difference between Polaris and FBM, there is none. Polaris was the first generation of the US Navy's Fleet Ballistic Missiles. Therefore, there's no confusion. 00:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Who was first?

message: Update: Holland (AS-32) was sold for scrap. She was towed from Suisin Bay 10 July 2013 to Mare Island dry docks. Typical clean-up period before turnover..  https://www.transportation.gov/fastlane/reserve-ship-uss-holland-leaves-suisun-bay MR2David (talk) 22:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Fate
Talk:United States N-class submarine

message: Definitely needs fixing, but I'll leave it to a sub guy.--Bedford 04:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please note that PigBoats.COM has been massively updated with a new format, new pages, new information, and improved functionality. Any links that are on this page and any associated sub-pages will have to be updated. DaveJ576 (talk) 23:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PigBoats.COM
Talk:Seventh Tree

message: There should be no more then 10 reviews in the infobox per WP:Albums. I've moved the reviews here if they are needed for future reference.
 * Art Nouveau Magazine (Positive) link
 * LAUNCHcast (9/10) link
 * The Telegraph (positive)link
Cheers
Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many reviews
Talk:Strychnos ignatii

message: Homeopathic information about this plant required reliable sourcing for inclusion. Please do not include it without a reliable source. Thanks. PouponOnToast (talk) 22:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we all need to get together to discuss what articles should have at least a mention of homeopathic use. Depending on where you live, we all know that countless homeopathic remedies sit on shelves or in medicine cabinets all over the world. Mere mention in an article would not be considered "undue weight" or "conflict of interest". As far as I am concerned I don't think that the indications for use should be mentioned. You won't find many docs who like the idea of people treating themselves based on what they have read online. Especially wikipedia. My official take is I think the "most used" (aka polychrest) remedies should have a brief passage along with their other pharmacologic/biologic/other use. I have no interest in discussing whether or not people think it works or how many controlled trials have been conducted. The simple truth is that people use it, and for that reason alone the information should be mentioned here.--travisthurston+ 02:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I have removed it; Draft:Nervoheel was recently deleted as not notable enough and quackery.  It also appears undue in such a small article.  —PaleoNeonate – 02:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeopathy 

message: It's Strychnos ignatii, not S. ignatia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.202.195 (talk) 09:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article to the right title.  Deli nk (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 
Talk:Mesk Tower

message: This is a very important building for Dubai.  It was one of the first 2 highrises in Dubai Marina.  Today, Dubai Marina has become an extemely important part of Dubai.  This building, along with Murjan Tower, form a well known image that represents Dubai and Dubai Marina.  The removal of this article would be okay if, and only if, it was just another residential high rise.  But it is not.  Being the first building in Dubai Marina (an area that now holds many of Dubai's towers) it is important. --Leitmanp 02:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not delete this article
Talk:Sami Siida of North America

message: This page is a non-profit educational group for people who share a common ansestory in North America.  It is simular in spirit to the Sons of Norway.  Dinkytown 04:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The Sami Siida of North America page (hereby known as the "Siida"), and the North American Sami Searvi page (hereby known as the "searvi") should not be merged for the follwing reasons:
The organization, known as the "searvi" is <U>not</U> an offshoot of the Sami Siida of North America, but is a separate organization, has claimed a false connections with the Siida's successful past, and under false pretenses.  The "searvi" was "founded" in 2015 as a separate organization, and under false pretense by eliminating dissent and dialog withing their group, and has tried to falsely connect itself with the Siida, which was founded in 1995 and has a long track record of cultural significance within North America, and is recognized by other Scandinavian organizations.
The Sami Siida of North America is also a US Federally recognized trademarked organization as described here:
The Siida has done dozens of events and sponsorship's since 1995, while the "searvi" has not done any events since it's founding.  This "searvi" has tried to connect a lineage with the successes of the Siida off Wikipedia, which is not warranted and blatantly false.
This page should be deleted for the following reasons:
# There are no sources that state there is a direct connection or linkage between the Siida or this searvi;
# There are no sources that the searvi has done any events, represents anyone, or has done anything notable;
# It also is a word-for-word copy of the Sami Siida of North America wiki page;
# It is an un-notable club.
I propose that this page be subject to speedy deletion as per WP:A7, WP:A10, WP:A11, and under WP:G10 and WP:G12
<P> Dinkytown talk 17:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposed to Merging with the Searvi page...
Talk:Bothrochilus

message: See AJH Issue 2!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.77.122.177 (talk) 23:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reputable source?  I wouldn't wipe my ass with AJH. Mokele (talk) 01:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No evidence for more than one norther species 

message: Second message on this. You edits appear to have introduced factual errors to this article. Secondly, this also appears to be a cut paste move. I hope I am overlooking something? 15:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  page move
Talk:William Frick

message: I have a connection to William Frick that could possibly be a conflict of interest and I will therefore refrain from making substantive edits. I have made some grammatical and punctuation changes which I think are uncontroversial and do not change the meaning. If anyone has a problem with this, please note it and I will refrain from making even such minor changes in future. ItalicizedComma (talk) 09:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editor conflict of interest notice
Talk:List of people from Hartford, Connecticut

message: ==Untitled==
Under the Nobility guidelines for politicians:
'Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."'
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians
I would say that Elizabeth May, Green Party leader of Canada, would fit the criteria of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  However, being a Green Party of Canada member, I am biased on this, and perhaps one may want to ask another Canadian if the press coverage has been significant.
(sorry forgot to sign, this was jlam @ 2008-09-28T17:18:30)
After not hearing any objections, I will add her name.
jlam (talk) 18:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elizabeth May 

message: Under the Nobility guidelines for politicians:
'Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."'
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians
I would say that Elizabeth May, Green Party leader of Canada, would fit the criteria of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  However, being a Green Party of Canada member, I am biased on this, and perhaps one may want to ask another Canadian if the press coverage has been significant.
(sorry forgot to sign, this was jlam @ 2008-09-28T17:18:30)
After not hearing any objections, I will add her name.
jlam (talk) 18:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Walkaround

message: The walkaround often served as the finale to the minstrel show.
I'm under the impression that the the walkaround was the conclusion to only the first half of the minstrel show, the semi-circle, and was followed by an intermission, olio (where specialty acts were performed) and an afterpiece. So if I'm wrong, please change it back to the way it was. 70.92.135.64 05:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  place in the minstrel show
Talk:Patrick Oboya

message: The current version of article claims: "He was the top scorer for Kenya in the qualifiers for Ghana 2008 with two goals." Is this correct? In 2008 Africa Cup of Nations qualification#Group 6 I was only able to find one goal of him, against Angola. --Kompik (talk) 14:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of goals in Ghana 2008 qualifaction? 
Talk:2007 Navy vs. North Texas football game

message: The lead says:
"...the most points scored in a D-IA/FBS [game during regulation time] ... since the NCAA began keeping records in 1937."
This line does not make sense to me without further qualification. The NCAA wasn't divided into Divisions until 1971 (and Division I wasn't divided into I-A and I-AA until a few years after that). I'd correct it, but I'm not sure exactly what the author is trying to say. Was it the highest combined score between two current FBS teams? Highest combined score between two teams considered "major college" at the time? Was it higher than any scores before the alignment into divisions...? Strikehold (talk) 07:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead problem
Talk:Elution

message: I still , 3 November 2008 (UTC)
:I say keep it separate from Chromatography but good call on the other mergers.--128.231.88.5 (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging in 

message: Mobile phase includes the solvent. This is is not the case in what is stated in the article. --kupirijo (talk) 15:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  mobile phase
Talk:Cheeky Watson

message: More than half this entry seems to be about Luke Watson, rather than Cheeky.
It also seems to have been written by someone who has some serious unresolved issues with the Watson family. AuntFlo (talk) 14:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Balance?

message: Also not sure about the comment about Kemp and Jones which looks like vandalism to me.  Willing to be proved wrong.
Jdh1971 (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Real?

message: Almost all the references provided is broken links:
Ref 1-Page doesn't load.
Ref 2-Page doesn't exist on domain.
Ref 3-Error 404.
Ref 4-Article doesn't exist.
Ref 5-Network time-out.
Ref 6-Directs to current news (Daily news).
Ref 7-Directs to current news.
Ref 8- Error 404.
Ref 10- Directs to current news.
Ref 11- Similar reference and link as ref 9.
Ref 12- Empty Page.
About a specific statement that Cheeky Watson was selected as a junior Springbok and declined:No reference is provided other than a link to a picture on a page that doesn't exist (anymore?). If no evidence is provided that he was selected it cannot be stated as a fact and should be removed.Proview77 (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References not found
Talk:Aviator badge

message: Not in article. Why not?
Georgejdorner (talk) 16:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWI German pilot's badge 

message: The transcluded sections of this article don't seem like that good of an idea. They create a bunch of additional headings at wrong levels, and are liable to break the article if someone edits the trancluded pages without noticing it's also visible here. I would strongly recommend the transclusions are replaced by  links with short summaries and maybe some images, to both make this article more manageable and keep it an overview.  — daranz [ t ] 12:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Transcluding articles may cause some technical limitations that can't be resolved by Wikipedians, which would leading misunderstands to readers. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 04:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transclusions in this article 