lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Temperature programmed desorption

message: I see Temperature programmed desorption with absolutely zero links, and Thermal desorption spectroscopy with links but shorter content - both claiming to be about the same thing. I see repeated changes to a redirect, and then the change reverted - a new redirect, and a claim that it's protected - and after THAT, a reversion to the long text with no links.
And zero discussion on the talk page.
Could someone please justify their actions? --Alvestrand (talk) 22:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For now, I've restored the redirect. --Alvestrand 19:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's going on here?
Talk:Gian Franco Reverberi

message: Gian Franco Reverberi is one of the most important professionals in italian pop music. 
Beside his career as a movie sountrack composers, he is extremely important as a composer, director, music director, arranger. He worked for the Ricordi, RCA and other music labels, editors and publishers. Many italian important pop music artists and songwriters's of the '50, '60, '70 are deeply linked with him: Giorgio Gaber, Adriano Celentano, Enzo Jannacci, Piero Ciampi, Luigi Tenco, Bruno Lauzi, Gino Paoli and a lot of others. He is the founder or the Scuola Genovese, one of the most important artistic movement ever in Italy. This should be well underlined here. I will write something and give some source soon if nobody else does it soon. 
See also https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gian_Franco_Reverberi
Ciao! --Simoneschiaffino (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  He also is a great producer, composer, arranger!
Talk:Siege of Buda (1686)

message: The article currently deals with two sieges (one in 1684 and one in 1686) with two infoboxes. This is quite confusing, thus in my opinion, the first (unsuccessful) siege should be put into a separate article called: Battle of Buda (1684). Cheers, KœrteFa {ταλκ} 20:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know why, but a split was reverted in 2012. I'll have it split now.--Zoupan 21:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split apart: First siege, 1684 

message: We will end up referring to the collective as Iberian inhabitants  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.122.171.103 (talk) 20:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalans are not Spanish ?
Talk:PAM graphics format

message: I see I’ve got myself a couple of notes.
“It does not cite any references or sources.” Very odd, considering there is a heading called “References” at the bottom of the entry, with a link to quite the authoritative source about the PAM graphics format: the PAM format specification on the Netpbm website.
“Its notability is in question.” Possibly. But that would be grounds for merging it into the Netpbm format entry, not for outright deletion.
“Its introduction provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter.” Well, in case the links to the Netpbm and Netpbm format entries aren’t sufficient, that could be another reason for the merger proposed above.
“It may need to be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.” What on earth was the one who tagged it with this tag thinking? This entry has conformed to the Wiki standards since its very inception. I’m no neophyte here—the wikification requirements are something I’m very familiar with.
All in all, this looks like a case of zealous bureaucracy. I wouldn’t be surprised to find at least one of the tags to have been added after a second-long skim of the entry (the first one, the “No references” tags that was added despite the reference at the bottom, is almost certainly such a case). --Shlomi Tal ☜ 22:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree that PAM isn't notable enough to have an article of its own.  But this information would work great in Netpbm format.  For one thing, that article is inconsistent with its title today, because it covers only 4 of the 5 Netpbm formats.  That also solves the context problem, being that the PAM article is mostly a contrast of PAM to PNM.  --Bryan Henderson 17:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The merging sounds like a good idea.  Maybe we could remove the issue tags and put up a suggested merge tag instead?  The merge would require some Netpbm format entry editing besides just copy-pasting the PAM entry to the end in its own section. BrotherE (talk) 18:29, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2007 issue tags
Talk:Kingfish (band)

message: To whoever added the references, it is usually a good idea to make clear which bit of information came from which source. For example by using <ref> tags, see WP:CITE#HOW for more information. -- Pepve (talk) 13:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely agree, and I'll put this on my "to do" list.  I don't know when I'll get to it though, so if anyone else wants to start on this, feel free. — Mudwater 01:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Kelvinbridge

message: Can we get a better picture than this absurd, clearly photoshoppped, effort?86.0.203.120 (talk) 22:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed this to a picture I took in March on an overcast day. --Stewart (talk) 06:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the old picture was much more attractive, and I don't remember any photoshopping. Aw well.FrFintonStack (talk) 23:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Both pictures now in the article - a sunny day (April 2007) and a dreich day (March 2007). --Stewart (talk) 00:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Drug addiction recovery groups

message: Hey all - since this page was previously part of a classroom assignment and during that time there were a lot of external links added. I've had mixed feelings about that as there is some utility to them and I didn't want to unduly contentious during a class assignment, but with the addition of the link to Recovery Dharma, I think it may be time to more strongly adhere to wikipedia guidelines, or this will just because a link farm. 
I would like to see Refuge Recovery and Recovery Dharma mentioned, I think we can do this by created a Buddhist drug addiction recovery groups page and have them linked. 
Any thoughts? - Scarpy (talk) 04:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:EL]] and Recovery Dharma/Refuge Recovery
Talk:William Lucas (actor)

message: According to this page, Lucas was in both Danger Man and The Prisoner. According to IMDB, Lucas was in the Danger Man episode “The Prisoner.” Felicity4711 (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he was not in "The Prisoner", Everyman Productions'/ITC's series of 1967/68. 2.28.151.141 (talk) 13:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Prisoner?
Talk:Qasim Barid I

message: Since Qasim Barid I was the soveriegn of an independent state there should be no argument on his inclusion.Johnpacklambert (talk) 22:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i have added a new refernce klick on the page and go down 1 page and read  on factionalism and divison.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.160.26.192 (talk) 13:32, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  refernce 

message: There are different references claiming different things.  A person cannot be a Turk of "Hungarian descent" ... was he captured and pressed into Ottoman service? If so, how did he come to arrive in Central Asia?  The citation of the "notes" claiming Hungarian origin is unreachable and was not archived by the editor who used it.  IMO, the best course would be just to remove the "Hungarian descent" statement until a more stable source can be found.  Anyone with a different opinion? Magyars and Turks are different nationalities. 50.111.61.157 (talk) 00:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  so, was he a Turk, or Hungarian?
Talk:Australian Holographics

message: Though I only briefly looked into it, I cannot find any artist named Ju Yong Lee who made any collaborations with Australian Holographics. I can find an artist called Juyong Lee, and he works with Holocenter in New York. I am sure it is referring to the same person but I cannot find anything about their work Australian Holographics. If anyone can do further research or knows anything it would be really appreciated.  Meowtehe (talk) 00:31, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist "Ju Yong Lee"
Talk:Joe Logan

message: Bearian (talk) 23:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

message: New article under constuction, about a coach in the MAAC. Bearian (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This person is not closely related to me. Bearian (talk) 23:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclosure 
Talk:Stamford

message: I separated the "Stanford" and "Stamford" items that had been combined on Stanford (disambiguation), and then recreated this Stamford page (which had previously redirected to Stanford). Stanford and Stamford disambiguations should be separate. This is exactly like the Kington/Kingston example given in the Style Guild. Hult041956 (talk) 23:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separated Stanford and Stamford
Talk:Wetherby railway station

message: I intend to split the current page into four pages:
*Wetherby railway station - A dis' page between the following three (the current title)
*Wetherby railway station (Linton Road) - The last major railway station in the town and the one which most of the text refers to
*Wetherby railway station (York Road) - The original station
*Wetherby racecourse railway station - The station built in place of the York Road station, as since the move to the Linton Road station in the 1900s, the main railway station was at the far end of the town from the racecourse
This will not be a simple move, and it will require copy and paste (to a degree) rather then a conventional move because the current page is a rather vague amalgamtion of the three railway stations.
If there is no objections, I will make the change shortly.
Mtaylor848 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably best to have the dab in the middle of the page name rather than the end, most have it this way but by no means all. Wetherby (Linton Road) railway station & Wetherby (York Road) railway station should do it. I would also use a capital for Racecourse in the third article. Keith D (talk) 21:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree with the split, though I think it could be more radical still. Currently it is an amalgam of discussion of the routes involved (Harrogate - Church Fenton, Wetherby - Crossgates) as well as detail on Wetherby station. I'm responsible more than anybody else for this fudge, as I have put the Beeching info etc. up, but I think that could be better organised. But it needs somebody with more skill and experience than me to do it.
Thank you for your feedback.  I shall split the pages this week.  I shall also try and create pages on the Cross Gates to Wetherby line and the Harrogate - Church Fenton line.  I may needs assistance on the latter.
Mtaylor848 (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split pages 

message: I have split the pages, however the work on the 'Cross Gates - Wetherby' and 'Harrogate-Church Fenton' railway lines which previously centred on the page 'Wetherby railway station' now centres on the page 'Wetherby (Linton Road) railway station'.  This is not a subject I am knowledgable enough to effectively work on.  Cheers, Mtaylor848 (talk) 18:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pages are split
Talk:Thomas Bancroft (poet)

message: The WHOLE first section of this article is as follows:
: 
: Thomas Bancroft was a minor poet from Swarkestone in South Derbyshire he was an associate of James Shirley and Sir Aston Cockayne. He wrote a number of poems and epigrams addressed to notable people. Many of the facts of his life are known from his poetry.[1]
: 
This fails to indicate whether, for example, he ever appeared on television or whether he knew Princess Diana and attended her funeral in 1997, but so what?---we'll find out such details later in the article, if they matter.  But wait: we find out later than he flourished in the 17th century.  Is it inconceivable that the before the end of the initial introductory session, we might get at least some impression of which era he inhabited? Michael Hardy (talk) 20:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious lack of context 

message: I'd like to add that there is inconsistency in the spelling of Aston's last name.  I don't want to edit it, since I don't know if "Cockayne" or "Cockaine" is the proper spelling.  The truth is out there.
I'm not sure the truth is out there. Shakespeare wasn't sure howe to spell his name. Samuel Johnson was not there yet. Aston article indicates this I think. Victuallers (talk) 22:32, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cockaine or Cockayne
Talk:Yonggary (1999 film)/Archive 1

message: A large amount of the synopsis was edited by an IP user who later added vandalism -- this may bring the accuracy of the article down. Perhaps someone could check? Thanks! --GorillaWarfare talk 03:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax? 

message: Just incase if you are a fan, it is me, Godzilla2000master, the person that has been part of tohokingdom forums and part of gojira's sanctuary forums. I am a reknown monster-know it all.
So, some people think it is a hoax. It is not. I do noy really know about how to link into acual articles footnotes, so I improvised. The plot was based on my viewing of the film, the information on the figures was on clubtokyo.org and I will give specific URLs only if asked, the dvd information came from amazon.co.jp and monsterzero.us. I cannot link to monsterzero.us due to server problems.
If you got any questions, ask me though here, since I go through this site daily for accuracy, or contact me through the gojira sanctuary forums which are owned by www.gojirassanctuary.4t.com.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.147.91 (talk) 01:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It is not hoax

message: "Dr. Huges finds an alien corpse with a fossilized diamond" -- AFAIK, there is no such thing as a "fossilized diamond". (See Fossil, if this is not obvious.) Does the film actually say this, or is this an error on the part of a Wikipedia editor? -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 17:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fossilized diamond"
Talk:Ichthus Christian Fellowship

message: There is a problem with the deletion of links and references to T.net a group of churches that were very closely associated with Ichthus until recently. I believe this doe not respect the NPOV, and request that this should cease. There is no need to go into why this might be the case at this point. 
Hyper3 (talk) 13:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: problem with deleting references

message: This article was proposed for deletion in 2008-01-21. I removed the proposal the same day as I understand this church to be notable, as influential on a large number of churches in the south-east of England and perhaps beyond. More information on this should be added by someone who knows of relevant reliable sources. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ... which hasn't been done in the year and a half since the article was tagged as unreferenced. Why assume that "someone" is going to do so now? Pairadox (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because it's unreferenced doesn't mean it's non-notable. I'll flag it up at WikiProject Christianity.  Come back in a month and if it's still not done then I'll look for refs myself, though I'd have to start from scratch; it's not my church/denomination, but I am indirectly aware of its widespread influence.  If I fail, by all means then force the issue at AFD. - Fayenatic (talk) 22:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Circle time

message: This page appears to be an advertising puff for Jenny Mosley's branded "Quality Circle Time"  and she appears to have written much of the evidence in support of her private commercial product˜˜˜˜
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Artaxerxesdaking  (talk • contribs) 18:19, November 26, 2007
:You're right -- it certainly seems like puff to me. I'm not sure what the best solution is, though I've certainly seen the term used outside of this product being described. I'll see what I can do about it... Agent0042 (talk) 03:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising Puff?

message: Content from this page has been copied without attribution:  (archive 17 June 2006 ). This is a violation of Wikipedia's licensing, but it's also important to be aware of it to avoid a backwards copyright violation deletion. It's other sites that are violating Wikipedia; there's no obvious evidence that this page was copied and pasted from other sites. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article has been copied by other websites 
Talk:Ken Aldred

message: I made an edit for the part of when Aldred had been disendorsed from Deakin in 1995 for the 1996 federal election due to allegations he made in Parliament based on documents that were proved to be forgeries. The article originally gave the misleading impression that Aldred was disendorsed because of these allegations. That is not true he made these allegations after he lost the preselection. He made the allegations as his parting shot. I have already contacted the ABC over the sourced ABC article to advise them about the correct extent of Aldred's disendorsement from Deakin.  The Shadow Treasurer (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegations did not cost Aldred the Deakin preselection 

message: Speaker Tony Smith has announced he died "last weekend". No online cites yet.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries]
: Got a link from Hansard, but still no clarity about the precise date of death. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 19:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a death notice in today's Herald Sun, but no specific date given. --Canley (talk) 05:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Local class field theory

message: i am insufficiently wikipedia-savvy to fix this, but the title is typoed. No one says "classfield theory."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.98.247 (talk) 19:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well some people do write "classfield theory". But "class field theory" is certainly much more common and modern. I'll try moving it, I highly doubt there will be any controversy, especially since the article on class field theory is called just that. RobHar (talk) 19:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! 129.2.56.27 (talk) 12:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Greater Hartford Academy of Mathematics and Science

message: This section is currently very POV in a positive direction, however I have no knowledge of these facilities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.201.49 (talk) 00:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reccomend revision of Learning Environment section 

message: i am doing some large edits for this article, including current name, principal, etc., since I go to this school. We should get both of the schools seperate pages, It would help alot.
Samurai235 (talk) 00:27, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: large edits in progress
Talk:Cogeco

message: This article needs a full rewrite in my opnion, ommiting much of the bias and technology reports.  Pretty silly as it is, looks like an internal pamphlet or a marketing article.  99.240.198.86 (talk) 23:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Full rewrite completed. — WildStar* 20:38, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing or Facts? 

message: Someone should point out that Cogeco offers a very limited selection of HD channels compared to Rogers 64.229.221.33 (talk) 01:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited HD Channel selection? 
Talk:David Abrahams (Labour party donor)

message: The current name David Abrahams (Labour party Donator) seems a bit long - what about David Martin Abrahams? - Trident13 (talk) 23:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current page title seems fine to me, although a redirect from (or to) David Martin Abrahams would be good as well. I would say prefer the current title as it's clear who the article is about from looking at the disamg. page, given the context given by the (...) as is standard. (i.e. I just got to the disamg. page and knew this was the one I wanted, whereas I wouldn't have had if we used the middle name version.) KTC (talk) 12:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd prefer David Martin Abrahams, with David Abrahams (Businessman) perhaps also a good alternative; the current title is a bit news-stroy specific. --Pretty Green (talk) 13:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions

message: I'm surprised that no-one's found or added the detailed info on the 1991 case brought by Allied Irish Bank against Mr. Abrahams and his business partner yet.
Channel 4 says "it is not presently known if the money was ever repaid", but if I'm correctly understanding what I've found on Google, it appears that Mr. Abrahams had avoided any obligation to repay the money in the first place. Unless I misunderstand, the reason the case went to the House of Lords was that the phrasing of the loan documents made his business partner liable for the entire debt -- Alan Gold, who from the details of the case, I suspect must be the brother of the Howard Gold already mentioned in the article.
The only mainstream media coverage I've found was in The Independent yesterday, but a little Googling finds an old article on the case here (pdf file); the House of Lords judgement on the appeal (wiht judges including not just Lord Hutton, bu also Derry Irvine) is here.
Alan Gold's subsequent litigation against Howard Gold's law firm is aluded to in various places, as [ here, here and here.
I don't have full confidence in my understanding of these matters, so I leave the details here for someone better-versed than me to write them up as required. --AJN 15:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted.  Complicated cases but I read it as the bank won in making Martin's partner Gold liable to pay the entire bank debt, as per the joint and several clause. Gold then sued his and Martin's law firm for negligance in allowing that clause and they paid up plus a lot of costs. In fact I imagine the law fims insurance paid up, so Martin and Gold effectively got away with the money AND the bank got it back.  Amazing.  Martin's lawyer happened to be Gold's  brother not that I'm suggesting anything but if I were the insurance company I would be very annoyed.  Anyway I have added a link to the case article.  --Dbdb 18:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Material to add

message: This new article from The Guardian may be of interest, as it provides a bit more detail on his background:  DWaterson 02:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New source
Talk:Reflection (computer graphics)

message: This page could use some information on how refelction is accomplished realistically in non-raytraced computer graphics.  Unfortunately, this a subject on which I know very little. Jeodesic (talk) 23:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What you're describing isn't actually reflection. Most polyhedra renderers are actually just texture-mapped to approximate reflection. You can't trace reflections without some degree of raytracing. I don't have a source for that, but that is my understanding. Adam McCormick (talk) 04:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)