lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:WikiProject Vancouver

message: There has been discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vancouver#Merge Template:vancouverproject and Template:Vancouverproject-gvrd about merging these two templates. The gvrd version of the tag has been updated to include a "city" field.--Bookandcoffee 21:21, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I've revised the template slightly, to achieve two goals. The first was to create coding to reflect the two North Vancouvers - you can now use NVanC for the City, NVanD for the District, and NVan (the original code) for both municipalities. The second goal was to reduce the bulk of the template, as it was quite large. To that end, I've edited the text slightly to cut out a few words, and combined the Vancouver flag graphic with the portal template to cut out one graphic. Thoughts? --Ckatzchatspy 05:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions 

message: It seems that the This article is primarily related to the city of.... part appears outside of the banner when used. This looks funky/buggy. Can it be place within the borders of the banner please? heqs ·:. 06:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primarily related city
Talk:Bustan (organization)

message: With a similar argument to the one I've posted at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bimkom, I'd like to mention that Bustan is a Hebrew word meaning "garden" (a rarely used one, though). This should probably be mentioned, or perhaps the link in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hebrew_words should be removed (or somehow modified). Dorfl 21:24, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Keep this for later:
* https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/In_Search_of_Greater_Syria/vDs9EAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Bustan+(organization)%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA157&printsec=frontcover
* https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Sustainable_Revolution/Ze0wAAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Bustan+(organization)%22+-wikipedia&pg=PT187&printsec=frontcover
CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Kumudini boat massacre

message: Since I've been asked to avoid an edit war with log Oz346 and use the talk page, I will do so.
The issue here concerns the contextualization of this event in the introduction section. I am of the opinion that the full context does not need to be included in the introduction. Oz's contention is that the full context needs to be included. But their actions belie this contention for they do not include the killings of service personnel that triggered the 1985 Valvettithurai massacre, a necessary part of the "full context". Furthermore, Oz felt the need to add contextualization of the Anuradhapura massacre as being a revenge attack as well as the cause for another anti-Tamil massacre. Yet strangely enough, they did not feel the need to add similar contextualization for either the preceding incident or the following incident. Therefore, I accuse Oz of having an ideological motive to try and downplay LTTE crimes as revenge, but make the army's crimes appear to be born of primordial, inherent hate. Thankfully, the asymmetries in contextualization were corrected by yours truly.
As such, by virtue of consistency and concision, I believe that only the immediately preceding incident is necessary in the introduction. This has precedent: for example, the Kristallnacht introduction mentions the assassination of Ernst vom Rath by Herschel Grysnzpan but not the persecution of Jews that drove Grysnzpan to assassinate the diplomat. And in this page, I see a possible compromise. If Oz wants to add a Background section to this page and explain the actual full context (as opposed to the partial 'full' context that they suggest), that would be fine.
Finally, as I wrote this, I noticed that I was referring to Oz as 'he'. Though I corrected every instance of calling Oz 'he' that I could find, I may not have caught them all. If Oz does not identify as 'he', I sincerely apologize.  SinhalaLion (talk) 03:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi your welcome to include the LTTE attack on army soldiers as the trigger for the VVT massacre in those relevant pages, and in a subsequent line on this page. e.g. 'The valvettithiurai massacre itself was sparked off by an earlier LTTE attack killing X soldiers.' I am more than happy for the complete picture to be given. This should end the chain.Oz346 (talk) 03:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much contextualization in the introduction?
Talk:Castleton, Greater Manchester

message: Alot of changes were made to this article at this point. Some were helpful, however the article has lost the formal tone expected in an article of this nature, and is now out of line with most place-name articles of Greater Manchester. It may be an idea to look at the comparision I've provided a link to, and edit the article so it's a happy medium of the two versions.
Also, is Castleton a village? I always thought of it as a town. Thoughts? Jhamez84 21:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems nobody has responded to the above in over 8 months. I've made some further changes to the article. I find the picture of the "Tourist signpost" quite awful, and very unencyclopdedic. I suggest a rethink here. The contents of that sign should be within the prose of the article, whilst a newer image is found to replace that one. Jhamez84 13:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Three-CCD camera

message: Shouldn't it be 3CCD? Does anyone say three-D or three-G? Google gives 7K hits for Three-CCD vs. 3M for 3CCD... --Adoniscik (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's typical to use full names, not the most common abbreviations. Dicklyon (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: * advantages over ccd ?
::*The article states three-CCD is superior in quality to a single CCD.
:::*Why?
:::JonTheSecond (talk) 09:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  3ccd vs. ccd 

message: A 23 July 2007 edit by Kosin123 claims "A single-chip image sensor using CYGM filter is more sensitive than a three-CCD sensor though."  Are there any references that support this?  It seems very counterintuitive. Kime1R (talk) 02:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's certainly not correct in general; it's possible some particular pair of devices compared that way.  Let's take it out. Dicklyon (talk) 16:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is possible that the intended statement was that a CYGM sensor is more sensitive than a standard Bayer sensor, which it is.  20.133.0.13 (talk) 13:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CYGM More Sensitive? 

message: Why no HD/3CCD cameras on sale ?86.176.62.205 (talk) 12:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean like the Panasonic HDC-SD range? 20.133.0.13 (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 ccds / HD 

message: I have now proposed that given the similarity of the subject; the fact that almost all the info in the destination article appears in this one, that the articles be merged.  Since this article is about the dichroic prism assembly and not actually about any type od sensor, that the target article be the "Dichroic prism" article.   Further discussion should therefore be in the Dichroic prism talk page. 109.157.161.93 (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Banque Populaire (Morocco)

message: Sorry for the sub stub status; the bank's website is temporarily inaccessible.--McTrixie 21:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aperture priority

message: AIUI what we now call aperture priority has the advantage over shutter priority and full-auto modes that it doesn't require motorized aperture control in the lens. So (assuming light metering is through the lens) it can be used with pretty much any lens. 188.222.186.27 (talk) 03:46, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  lower tech option 

message: This sentence below is kind of silly: 
Another common use of aperture priority mode is to suggest how the camera should determine a shutter speed, without risking a poor exposure. In landscape photography a user would select a small aperture when photographing a waterfall, hoping to allow the water to blur through the frame. 
Of course since aperture/shutter-speed are both used to get a good exposure this will happen.  But if you were trying to "adjust shutter speed without risking a poor exposure", you'd use Shutter priority mode...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.247.183 (talk) 04:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the section isn't very clear and perhaps can be worded better, but I'm of the opinion that that particular point is actually accurate.  I'd guess it's more common for a photographer in that situation (if not shooting in manual mode) to set the aperture priority to allow the smallest amount of light possible, and let the camera determine shutter speed for the lighting conditions in each shot.  Since the aperture is at its smallest possible diameter, the photographer can be sure that the slowest possible shutter speed will be used, and therefore create the greatest possible blurring effect of the water for each shot, while maintaining proper exposure.  When using shutter priority mode, you might be missing some 'slowness', if lighting conditions momentarily get cloudier and darker, for example - it would open up the aperture up rather than slow the shutter speed down.  Does that make sense?  AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silly sentence
Talk:Northshore Mall

message: I disagree with the notion that this article isn't notable enough for Wikipedia. It needs more sources, and I would love to do that next time I have significant spare time, but I'm sure it would be easy to find them. Nearly all shopping centers in the United States have Wikipedia articles on account of articles showing up in the news each time there's a tenant change. I've decided that tagging this article for having too few sources is more suitable to this article's situation. MichaelIvan 05:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Full Moon Fever (film)

message: Two years is not a long time to wait for news on upcoming films (even films with a much higher budget often go quiet for two years). Plus, the original reports said that the graphic novel would be produced first and then the movie would be based on the graphic novel, and that has happened in the last two years, so what we were told earlier seems to be on schedule, with everything on track. Unless someone objects here soon, I'm going to remove the template. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 21:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

message: :::Actually, after reviewing the policies at Wikipedia:Proposed deletion I see that "prod" is not the proper tag to be sitting on an article that anyone (including myself) has objected to the deletion of. I'm afraid I'm going to remove the "prod" now and you'll have to do a full-blown AfD. Sorry about this, but I really do feel that this article has been sourced well enough that it doesn't violate Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and even big studios are likely to have silences of a year or two in length about upcoming films, with a burst of press releases just a few months before the film hits theaters. Why delete it if it might need to be re-created as soon as four months from now? Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 04:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod tag removal

message: Well, the merge tage has been there for a month and there hasn't been any discussion here. My vote is no vote because I can easily see either way being fine. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 22:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Al-Ahli Club Sanaa

message: I see this page is up for deletion. It's true that the Yemenis are suspended from FIFA but this will probably be a temporary situation. Even at that, Yemen are involved in the AFC, and it's through that organisation that we can find verifiable info. For example the Yemen clubs compete in the AFC Cup, and Ahli San'a did so earlier this year - there's plenty of info to back that up, including coach name, player names, stadium info etc. Deleting this page is a terrible idea for these reasons. Nach0king (talk) 20:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?
Talk:Cross processing

message: Agfa Precisa is in production again, sold under the name "Agfaphoto". Also, I think "Underexposure also causes a strong magenta cast." is just wrong and unproved. The results of cross processing do not only depend on the film, but also on the way it's scanned/printed, while the exposure itself is more likely to influence the contrast of the picture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.130.90.247 (talk) 02:33, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agfa Precisa 

message: — Assignment last updated by DionnaTaylor (talk) 20:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Online Communities
Talk:Eastman Color Negative

message: I've deleted the two photography-related templates (photo stub on the article and WP History of Photography template here) because the ECN development process is exclusively used for motion picture film technology, and thus would be outside of the HoP project scope - at least as far as I'm interpreting it...otherwise we have a bit of a discussion that needs to be done regarding project overlap limitations. Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 17:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photography template deletions
Talk:Jacob Two-Two

message: The list there is clearly from the TV series, not the books. Could someone with more time to spare than I do fix it? 68.151.44.253 (talk) 04:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added two book characters from Jacob Two-Two and the Dinosaur, but I haven't read the third book in over ten years and can't recall which characters should be removed because they are from the TV series.  At any rate, the writing and editing on the character entries is somewhat poor, so I'll try and work on that over the next little while. Superbeltway (talk) 09:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: This article is somewhat unorganized and a little bit unclear I request revisions and maybe some pictures to improve this article. Multimusiclover1 (talk) 08:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing Is Needed!!
Talk:Matthew Boulton College

message: Why not just make this a redirect? It would not require deletion. --Salix alba (talk) 21:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. However if anyone wants this (longer) name to be the real title on the printed page then a move is needed I think. I have no preference. Perhaps do as you suggest and see if anyone wants them swapped. I think this long name is the correct one as shown on the college's own site. Oosoom Talk to me 20:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Removed the following unsourced, POV paragraph to talk page. Can this be given sources?
=== 2006 ===
Despite it's grand £40 million opening, the first year at the new college saw A-Level results drop drastically. In a survey of the college, many of the students blamed the lecturers' reliance on "Thomas Telford Online", an online learning programme. The students claimed that the lecturers refused to help when asked, instead telling them to look at the Telford material to find a solution. However, the students also pointed the finger at learning board Edexcel who controversially lowered the deadline date from July to May.
The drop in A-Level has led to an OFSTED inspection, which is due to take place in November 2006
Oosoom Talk to me 21:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 POV 

message: Despite it's grand £40 million opening, the first year at the new college saw A-Level results drop drastically. In a survey of the college, many of the students blamed the lecturers' reliance on "Thomas Telford Online", an online learning programme. The students claimed that the lecturers refused to help when asked, instead telling them to look at the Telford material to find a solution. However, the students also pointed the finger at learning board Edexcel who controversially lowered the deadline date from July to May.
The drop in A-Level has led to an OFSTED inspection, which is due to take place in November 2006
</blockquote>
Oosoom Talk to me 21:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006
Talk:Edge enhancement

message: I've done some work to improve this article now.  It still needs some external sources, but I'm hoping that it no longer deserves the context tag.  I also wanted to point out that the concepts pertaining to edge enhancement are very similar to those for unsharp masking, and in some ways people could use one term when they mean the other, or use one term for both.  mmj (talk) 05:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This is in response to the "suggestion" EE be merged with Unsharp Masking. These are different processes that produce similar results. That doesn't make them mergeable under one subject or another. With a whole new subject e.g. "Taking the Blur out of Photos", EE and UM could be combined. 
As far as acutance is concerned: "In photography, acutance is the edge contrast of an image". Who is making these suggestions that a definition of the quality of a photo be "merged" with EE and/or UM, both processes? Get your concepts right. This EE article is fine as it stands, so is the UM article. Cross referencing is sufficient. Dangnad (talk) 23:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the Same

message: The sharpness knob I'm used to is actually controlling the beam convergence. It can get out of tune, and requires an adjustment to keep the beam tight. A little bit out of tune results in a fuzzy image.12.139.157.2 (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sharpness isn't edge enhancement
Talk:El castillo de los monstruos (1958 film)

message: http://www.abandomoviez.net/db/pelicula.php?film=5690 WP:FILEUPLOADWIZARD In ictu oculi (talk) 08:16, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Poster upload needed

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:El Castillo de los monstruos#Requested move 22 July 2018.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:El Castillo de los monstruos#Requested move 22 July 2018]]
Talk:Johns (film)

message: In the CAST list at the end of the movie it says David Arquette (plays John). And Lukas Haas (plays Donner).  Yet on the DVD cover listed here the film shows their names & photos over the opposite person (or in reverse)????
I.E. Lukas Haas's name is over "John's" photo and David Arquette's name is over "Donner's" photo.
I thought I had the character's wrong and it confused **my tail** the entire movie...  But I checked and I'm right. For example: when Arquette (John) goes into the hotel near the beginning of the movie to see Haas (Donner), Arquette clearly walks in the door calling out "Donner--", "Donner---!'
Secondly, near the end of the film Lukas Haas is in the hotel bathroom near the last 5-10 mins. of the film (during the confession), he clearly says "Don't leave me John" (which is David Arquentte he's talking to).
Did the DVD printer know that they screwed up on the cover?
CaribDigita (talk) 03:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not the only one who's confused.  For some reason I thought James Marsden was in this film.  63.92.243.201 (talk) 04:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the DVD printer screw up on the cover? haha
Talk:Economy of Kyrgyzstan

message: Hello everyone, I am working for the International Trade Centre (ITC). I would like to propose the addition of an external link that could lead directly to the specific country’s trade data held by ITC. I would like you to consider this link under the WP:ELYES #3 prescriptions. Moreover, the reliability and the pertinence of this link can be supported by the following facts 
1) ITC is part of the United Nations
2) No registration is required
3) Trade data (imports/exports) are regularly updated
4) The link gives direct access to the trade database of the specific country
5) The addition of reliable trade data to the Economy section of the country could provide an appropriate contribution to the information therein contained. 
Thank you for your attention.Divoc (talk) 04:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITC external link on trade data 

message: This wikipedia page lists the United Kingdom as the largest trade partner for Kyrgyzstan. This is based on OEC data indicating about $470M exports from Kyrgyzstan to the UK. However, the UK Department of Business and Trade reports that imports from Kyrgyzstan have been less than £12M per year for every year in the last 10 years. Does anyone have an explanation for this discrepancy? 
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65d4b95ac2682d001628e917/kyrgyzstan-trade-and-investment-factsheet-2024-02-22.pdf 92.236.183.37 (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy of export data
Talk:Chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers of Kyrgyzstan

message: This article is in desperate need of a serious update. The new political order has been in place for some 9 months and still this article leads with the old system.
184.100.145.52 (talk) 22:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious Update

message: She is not really PM, all sources say she is the interim leader. In fact even the govt claims this, pending elections in 2010 (and its success) there is not "PM" elected or not in official state capacity.
:Even the template affirms she is in the interim.(Lihaas (talk) 13:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interim PM 

message: is the Chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers head of government? Is really this office a head of government rather than the president? It should be like to State Minister of Artsakh. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. " Article 89. 2. The structure and composition of the Cabinet of Ministers shall be determined by the President. The Chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers shall be the head of the Presidential Administration. The Minister of Finance shall be the Deputy Chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers. " We need a new page. --Panam2014 (talk) 03:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

text: the PM was head of government not the CCM. So we need a new page or an explanation in this article. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head of government? 