lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Transhistoricity

message: I apologise for the patchy nature of this item. It was jotted down a long time ago, not updated, and I have little time to flesh it out at present. I've noted the concerns of other editors and begun the work of tying it to references and relevant debates. There's more to do here, and if no-one else picks it up I'll try to do that soonish. Thanks for your patience!
Adhib (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Beckov Castle

message: How are the first three sentences in the chapter "20th century" related to the ruins of the castle?--Pelex (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  20th century 
Talk:Meyronne, Saskatchewan

message: (Cocopie (talk) 19:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Please explain to Non-Canadians the term " special service area ". It is not understood by European English speakers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.82.248.51 (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  please explain 
Talk:Nokia 6000 series

message: The 6xxx series do not seem to have much in common. May be this entry should be split into e.g 61xx 63xx, 66xx etc. Andries (talk) 19:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split up? 

message: * Missing the 6650 Fold.  Probably a lot more.  --Treekids (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing many
Talk:Sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 2B

message: An article about Sodium cotransporters references this article.  Would it be appropriate to return the favor, and reference that article?  It has at least a brief description of the role of proteins like this (and there isn't much else).
--Captain Puget (talk) 23:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant Wikipedia reference
Talk:Department of Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media

message: The article title is currently "Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht" but the name of the department is now "Department of Media, Tourism, Arts, Culture, Sport and the Gaeltacht". Shouldn't the redirect be from the old name to the new name rather than the other way round?
In addition, the table titled "Alteration of name and transfer of functions" clearly needs to be updated with the details of the latest name change.
DONAL HUNT (talk) 16:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Manu the Great

message: Simply put, this page should not exist. There was no such a Mesopotamian deity as "Manu the Great." The only sources listed are either too old to be credible (as expected from 19th century scholarship pertaining to languages which were not even fully understood yet) or, in a single case, the result of a person with no expertise (a poet, not a historian, let alone an assyriologist) uncritically repeating claims found in 19th century literature (in a book about Abrahamic angels, not Mesopotamian gods at that!). There is no "Manu" listed in Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie, or in any other credible modern reference work, for that matter. I do not think "a god invented by a handful dubious 19th century sources with no real impact on the field" meets any notability critieria. The fact the article seems mostly concerned with connecting this invented deity with the Bible - not with any primary Mesopotamian sources - does not exactly help either. The use of the nebulous term "Chaldean" pretty clearly in its vintage sense does not help either.
Furthermore, the closest thing to a god of time in Mesopotamian mythology would be the pair Duru-Dari from various lists of divine ancestors (discussed ex. in W. G. Lambert's "Babylonian Creation Myths" from 2013), who were not actively worshiped, but merely could appear as a possible prime mover in enumerations of cosmogonic and theogonic figures.
As far as I am concerned, this should be deleted. There is simply no way to salvage this page because its subject does not exist outside of a handful of basically worthless sources. It's even less legitimate than making a page for Adar, the vintage erroneous reading of Ninurta's name, would be. HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 06:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I was surprised to find this page at all, considering that "Chaldean" is a Biblical term, not an actual civilization with its own gods. "Manu" doesn't sound like any authentic Sumerian or Semitic name that I can remember seeing in any document written after the proper transliteration systems were developed. Also the article essentially admits that there is only one source for this information, with no follow-up from any reliable scholars thereafter.Quixilver391 (talk) 04:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of credible sources
Talk:Peggy Dell

message: Look at this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfTisKzbGqc  --Peggys voice over stills-did she tour nazi germany in the thirties ? Also something about how deep her voice became in later life would be good -hormonal ? cigarettes?--— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 06:31, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  nazis and her later voice
Talk:National Archives of Ireland

message: I have reverted to the following sentence as the insertion of "English Rule" is emotional, political, and factually untrue. Ireland went through several stages of Government covered by the archive including being in the UK. To characterise it all as "English Rule" is sloppy and misleading. The below sentence is accurate and as such should not be controversial.
"These papers were most often records relating to the administrations of the various Lord Lieutenants of Ireland, who acted as the representatives of the monarch"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.226.29 (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated vandalism to include inaccurate "English Rule"
Talk:Technogamia

message: Archive.org has the full text at https://archive.org/details/technogamiaormar00holy if anybody wanted to add that in the appropriate way.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.99.100.236 (talk) 02:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [Full text online]]

message: I have set up a page for the above and transferred over the section on the author. Lucian Sunday (talk) 10:39, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Barten Holyday]]
Talk:Membrane-associated transporter protein

message: Why is there a map for SLC24A5 distribution in an article on SLC45A2?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.0.196.8 (talk) 22:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed Tobus (talk) 22:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Map?
Talk:Heward, Saskatchewan

message: (Cocopie (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Chester Beatty Library

message: It would be good to have something in the article about the notorious thefts of the 1980's: http://www.rte.ie/radio1/doconone/radio-documentary-chester-beatty-islamic-art-david-jame.html --Rudolphs revenge (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  David James 

message: Chester Beatty now calls itself a 'museum', not just a library:
https://chesterbeatty.ie/about/
It seems the entry title should be modified.
Thanks.
--Malekfarugh (talk) 00:35, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum or Library? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 22:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Chester Beatty Library →  – The Chester Beatty Library is now referred to just as the Chester Beatty, and the article reflects that. Chester Beatty currently redirects to Alfred Chester Beatty, the museum/library's founder, but I believe this should be changed, as the institution would seem to be the slightly more primary topic, given current usage. The article does receive marginally more page views. Paul_012 (talk) 16:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 October 2021 

message: I have just removed from External links the handlists of Arabic manuscripts not currently working as it says they are being redeveloped. In my opinion even when redeveloped they are not something for Wikipedia, but rather for the Chester Beatty's own website. What do others think?Aineireland (talk) 22:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Template talk:David Croft

message: Credit for creating this should go to User:84.69.32.74. Bob talk 20:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Credit

message: Should Hugh and I  be in the template? While not written by Croft (or created by him) its first 5 series were produced by Croft and it is in :Category:David Croft sitcoms. This is also the case for its sequel Hugh and I Spy. The series had an impact on Croft's later work, and actors who became known for appearing in Croft works appeared here, notably Mollie Sugden, but also Felix Bowness and others. Indeed star Hugh Lloyd would appear in a recurring role in Croft's later series You Rang, M'Lord?. I am open minded on this, but it seems if they are not here, then they should not be in the category. Dunarc (talk) 20:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Hugh and I''
Talk:Edgewater Generating Station

message: This section is partially incorrect, or at least confusing:
At present, coal is delivered to the plant entirely by railroad, originating primarily from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming, via a Union Pacific spur line that was originally the main line of the Milwaukee Northern interurban railway.
The first part about coal being delivered entirely by rail is correct.
The Union Pacific spur line is a bit confusing.   It depends on which section of track is being referred to as the spur.  The roughly 2 mile east-west section from the plant, which can be labeled a spur, was part of the Milwaukee Northern (TMER&L).  When looking at the entire lakeshore sub originating from Milwaukee, this is also technically a spur line.  It is formerly the mainline of the Chicago and Northwestern railroad between Milwaukee and Green Bay.  This larger section of track was NOT shared with the Milwaukee Northern, though the two lines essentially ran side by side from Port Washington to Sheboygan.  Since the track gauge was the same, there were a couple interchange points between the two lines, including one at Port Washington, whose (at the time) coal-fired power plant was also serviced by the Milwaukee Northern.
Basically, the section referring to the Milwaukee Northern interurban line is a little misleading without further context.  Reading it one way, it sounds like the Union Pacific is using a former interurban line for 50 miles to deliver coal, which is not correct.  In reality, the last couple miles in Sheboygan is over the former right of way of the Milwaukee Northern.
I'd make the change myself, but I don't have the references to cite this information at the time.
Radon360 (talk) 15:16, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railroad Information
Talk:2008 South Carolina Republican presidential primary

message: Any help with this article would be appreciated. It seems that this article is being ignored to a degree. I hope you all realize that this primary is occuring today. --King of the Clowns (talk) 20:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No results yet. Skomorokh incite 20:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming Primary 

message: Can anyone explain to me why McCain and Huck are so close in votes and so far apart in Delegates?
Lajekahr (talk) 14:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a winner take all situation. So even if Huckabee placed second in every district because McCain won the distict he gets the delegates. If you need more clarity just say so. Hope that helps. --King of the Clowns (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He did not win every district as you can see from the results. --King of the Clowns (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it. The thing I was missing is that SC isn't winner take all, but they do weight the results by giving the winner 18 and then spreading the rest of the delegates. In which case these numbers make sense. 68.183.233.53 (talk) 02:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you put something in the main article about this weighting system? Thanks. Bondegezou (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are they dividing the delegates here 
Template talk:Communist Party of the Soviet Union

message: I was wondering how did Ivashkov die in 1994? I find the man interesting, were there any major events under his short rule and was his death related to communism?
(For the record, this guy is talking about Vladimir Ivashko) The USSR ceased to exist in December of 1991, so his death in 1994 was not related. He took control of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in August of that year after the coup attempt. The CPSU was banned in Russia shortly thereafter by Boris Yeltsin (who led the Russian SFSR, which was at the heart of the Union) so I doubt Ivashko could do anything in the time allotted. He was just put into the position in order to have someone fill it.
Furthermore, by that point there were only two people with power: Gorbachev (as President of the Soviet Union) and Yeltsin (as President of Russia). In 1989 Gorbachev allowed other political associations (and pretty much de facto political parties) to coexist with the Communist Party, and in 1990 removed its status as vanguard party of the Soviet Union. The Communist Party's power over the state ended that same year with the newly-created Soviet Presidency. As the Soviet Union began to fall apart the Communist Party pretty much fractured and thus became impotent. The position of General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was useless by the time Ivashko held it, having been superseded by the Soviet Presidency and deprived of any legitimacy after the August coup attempt. Gorbachev's continued existence as General Secretary was just to prevent another rival from appearing.
This probably belongs in the actual article about Ivashko, but yeah. --Mrdie (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Older comments

message: I find this template problematic as it absorbs lots of events prior to the formation of the Soviet Union, and I feel it is an uncritical endorsement of the sort of one-sided historiography that even predates Stalin's 1931 tract Some Questions Concerning the History of Bolshevism. It does not take into account Anti-Leninist Bolshevism. I think it should be broken down into a history of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party prior to the October Revolution, thereby including the Mensheviks, Vpered etc, with another template post the Bolshevik seizure of power. Leutha (talk) 00:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I find that idea very interesting, but :Template:Workers' Party of Korea also shows that it's possible to merge the two ideas into one if done properly. Do you, for instance, have list of members of the Menshevik Central Committee? --TheUzbek (talk) 10:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: This whole template is problematic
Talk:P.O.T.U.S. (Sirius XM)

message: (1)  I've heard announcements refer to POTUS '08 as "Politics of the United States", rather than President, though obviously the President acronym is in more widespread use.
(2)  I've also heard them mention covering the 2008 campaign "right through to the inauguration".  Is there some source that mentions the channel closing down in Novermber?
:The channel is named for the acronym of "President of the United States".  For the second point, the press release states that the channel will air though the November elections.  Anything after that is not guaranteed.  TravKoolBreeze (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two points

message: As of November 12, 2008, POTUS '08 merged with Sirius Indie Talk to become "POTUS - Politics of the United States" (officially ending that debate, I guess!)
I have moved this article to P.O.T.U.S. (Sirius XM).  TravKoolBreeze previously moved it from P.O.T.U.S `08 to P.O.T.U.S.  However, while the former is reasonable because P.O.T.U.S `08 probably refers to the station, P.O.T.U.S should redirect to President of the United States, considering both P.O.T.U.S. (with trailing period) and POTUS go there.  Hm. As I type this, it looks like someone has made P.O.T.U.S. (disambiguation) and made the acronyms go there, which is fine by me as well.  ToastyKen (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Promotes itself as neither left or right, but it is a totally leftist liberal station. Gonna remove it from my favs. Gave it a few months of trial, but enough is enough. Neildburt (talk) 12:08, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal station
Talk:Office de Formation et de Documentation Internationale

message: I created the article. Having articles about sources (see Computer programs and the Patent Cooperation Treaty# note-Gunter Gall) is invaluable. This organization Office de Formation et de Documentation Internationale is defunct, but it organized advanced legal seminars back in the 1980s. This was well before the Google age, and that explains why a Google search does not help much to establish notability. But as a source of information, I would keep this article. Thanks. --Edcolins (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Armenia–Russia relations

message: I have placed a cleanup tag as I've read the article a number of times and it's difficult to make sense out of it and it uses abreviations that people probably don't know about. For example: "The collaboration of Armenia in the size ODKB, according to the estimation of Armenian side, is the essential element of its national security". What is ODKB and what is that sentence trying to say? Pocopocopocopoco 01:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is also too positive about the current state of Russo-Armenian relations.  It does not address Russia's growing monopoly on Armenian infrastructure or any concerns over it.  It also does not mention anything of attacks by Neo-Nazi groups in Russia against Russian-Armenians, Armenian immigrants, and Armenian migrant workers, prompting complaints from the Armenian government. -- Aivazovsky (talk) 20:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

text: This article is ridicuously bias, and is the product of opinion rather than valid fact. I grow tired of such pro-Western viewpoints, highlighting the Russian Federation as a diabolical figure in Eastern politics. The tone of this article is unbefitting of Wikipedia, and I call for this entire thing to be rewritten. Opinion is not fact. Personal speculation can't be passed off as accurate universal concerns.  -- User:Dystopian  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.214.22.172 (talk) 13:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup tag
File talk:Nevada caucus 2008 Caesars Palace CNN.jpg

message: If someone has free media to demonstrate this unique event, by all means, please replace the image. For what it's worth, the end result at the caucus being pictured was 86 for Obama and 80 for Clinton. I do like one observation: A nation of 300 million people watching under 200 people's decision-making is pretty humorous. The jeering back and forth was pretty amusing though. Cheers! Thompsontough (talk) 20:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Residual-excited linear prediction

message: Isn't it used again for mobile phones communications? --Čikić Dragan (talk) 21:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-01-30 Automated pywikipediabot message
Template talk:Disney California Adventure

message: Should this template include a section for former attractions if there are articles for them? 72Dino (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former attractions? 

message: IP editor: please stop adding unnavegable entries. You are editwarring and violating Wikipedia guidelines. James (talk/contribs) 20:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war
Talk:Shim Eun-kyung

message: What about Shin Eun-kyung starring in My Wife Is a Gangster (Jopog manura, 2001) ?
Is this the same Shin Eun-kyung ?
If so, it should be listed in the filmography.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Wife_Is_a_Gangster
70.26.13.147 (talk) 18:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Wife Is a Gangster (Jopog manura, 2001)
Talk:List of songs recorded by Jonas Brothers

message: *We need to cite this information about the Jonas Brothers song featuring Soulja Boy. Yanra36 (talk) 21:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Crazy Love

message: Here We Come Again/Calling the World are NOT the name of their 3rd album. Here We Come Again was confirmed by Hollywood Records to be a rumored name, and Calling the World is Roodney's album. Thank You. calliegal_x (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here We Come Again/Calling the World 

message: This song is incorrectly listed as original, when it is in fact a cover.  See What_I_Go_To_School_For
:Fixed! Sunshine ☼ (talk) 00:28, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What I Go to School For

message: This article needs to be brought to standards of other featured-lists and good-articles on Wikipedia.  This would include removal of these elaborate tables with extra colors and headings, etc. as well as the massive overlinking.  That I will work on within the next few days if no one else takes up the task, however right now I am removing "unreleased songs" (completely unsourced) and "cover songs" which is also not source-able and not notable. - eo (talk) 19:53, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag placed

message: Changes made:
* I kept a table format as the songwriters information was here, with the standard "wikitable" template.  No special colors, boldfacing or centering of text.
* Sections combined.  No need for separation of "bonus tracks", "collaborations" or "soundtrack songs", etc.  A Jonas Brothers song is a Jonas Brothers song, and all are incorporated into the main list.
* Song and album title formatting (quotes or italics, naming conventions, capitalization of words, etc.)
* Severe overlinking corrected.
* All remaining wikilinks double-checked and corrected (or removed) where needed.
* Alphabetizing JONAS songs (if people prefer that this be shown in order of season/episode, this table can certainly be made "sortable".  I chose alphabetizing so that it is in the same format as the main table).
* Removal of Nick Jonas section, as he already has his own "list" page.
* No data that was here has been removed and I have added no new songs.  Songs appearing twice (in different sections) were combined. - eo (talk) 15:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup done

message: Jon McLaughlin did not help to write the song "Year 3000" performed by the Jonas Brothers and should be removed from the list of songwriters.
Desmond Child helped to write the song "You Just Don't Know It" performed by the Jonas Brothers and should be added to the list of songwriters.
http://jonasphotosonline.com/displayimage.php?pid=31895&fullsize=1
http://jonasphotosonline.com/displayimage.php?pid=31897&fullsize=1
These two photos are scans from the original It's About Time CD, and the songwriters are credited underneath the song titles.
71.207.42.68 (talk) 03:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Oxguy3 tc 23:09, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 71.207.42.68, 2 October 2010