Talk:Beretta M9

message: Hello.
According to the Army's Technical Documentation for the Army (ARMY TM 9-1005-317-10) the date of the first print of the technical documentation for this weapon dates back to 1985. I am not sure, that the first date of service is correct; I agree, that there was a revision of the technical manual was released on the 14th of December, 1990, but that was just the third after a revision in 1987 and one in 1989.
I didn't want to modify the 'in service date', but doesn't this mean, that the weapon entered first in service in 1985?
Regards:
Norbert79 (talk) 13:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Army tech. doc. produced quickly (for Army, other services) back in 1985. Possible & likely that Army had moved to M9 before other services. By 1986, U.S. Navy move from Colt to Beretta remained topic of discussion, but Navy shipboard watchstanders still carried Colts. USMC did not complete move to M9 until early 1990s. "In service" here means in service for U.S. Army. BubbleDine (talk) 14:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of 'In Service' 

message: The statement that the Marine Corps. is replacing the M9 with the M4 carbine is obviously incorrect, as one doesn't replace sidearms with rifles.  A perusal of the cited MARADMIN source seems to suggest that it is the M16 that is to be phased out on a limited basis.
--Jqbox (talk) 04:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Users 

message: No mention of the cost of the various competitors in the selection process has been made. Why is that? Surely it's of prime importance, as with the procurement of the magazines etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LNPS1 (talk • contribs) 16:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selection for Use 

message: This picture is not an M9 at all, the pistol on the picture is a 92FS model with an M9 slide. This is the actual U.S. made M9 pistol. Gladius123p (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_Navy_050326-N-7526R-009_Marines_assigned_to_2nd_Fleet_Antiterrorism_Security_Team_(FAST)_Company,_3rd_Platoon,_fire_their_9mm_pistols_at_targets_during_a_live_fire_small-arms_familiarization_exercise.jpg does not seem to actually contain any M9A1s. The pistols in the back seem to be regular M9s, based on the shape of the trigger guard, and the front gun seems to have a Surefire MR11 rail.
114.32.239.121 (talk) 09:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marines with M9A1? 

message: I disagree that this is the standard, or at least that it is the de facto standard. M9 is the designation used by the military; Beretta is nowhere in its name. Other examples: M249 light machine gun (U.S. variant of the FN Minimi), M16 rifle (military AR-15), M14 rifle, etc. Other similar examples: most fighting vehicles (M1 Abrams, e.g.) and artillery (M777 howitzer, e.g.), firearms that are known by a particular name despite the official name being slightly different (M1 Garand instead of just M1 rifle) There is already an article on the Beretta 92, on which the M9 is based. TaintedMustard (talk) 12:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move from M9 pistol 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Beretta M9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100106170632/http://www.berettale.com:80/catalog_92FS.htm to http://www.berettale.com/catalog_92FS.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090522040604/http://news.prnewswire.com:80/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104 to http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-29-2009/0004962662&EDATE=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: If I'm correctly interpreting the article provided, the "M9A2 concept" seems to have all the same improvements over the M9A1 that are listed are present on the M9A3. So I'm inclined to think that the conceptualized M9A2 being described and M9A3 are basically the same pistol, with M9A3 being the name bestowed on the production pistol. I'm not going to change anything on the page yet since any changes would be too significant and I would like to get a consensus on this by at least a couple other editors. Spartan198 (talk) 06:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  M9A2 concept = M9A3? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Beretta M9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090522040604/http://news.prnewswire.com:80/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104 to http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-29-2009/0004962662&EDATE=
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111219111057/http://www.berettausa.com:80/usarmypurchasesadditionalberetta9mmpistols/ to http://www.berettausa.com/usarmypurchasesadditionalberetta9mmpistols/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140408000755/http://www.beretta.com:80/en-us/90-series/ to http://www.beretta.com/en-us/90-series/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704001537/http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Bush/06/BUSH.PHTSupplyCorp.pdf to http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Bush/06/BUSH.PHTSupplyCorp.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Beretta M9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129181536/http://www2.marines.mil/news/messages/Pages/2007/Messagesfinal4.aspx to http://www2.marines.mil/news/messages/Pages/2007/Messagesfinal4.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beretta M9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120401070055/http://www.professionalmariner.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=C669DF9695CB4B1CBBBBF5466264BAC1 to http://www.professionalmariner.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=C669DF9695CB4B1CBBBBF5466264BAC1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified