Talk:Lost and Found (Mudvayne album)

message: Lost and Found is an extremely common title for books and music albums alike.
Why this article should be dedicated to Mudvayne is mind-boggling. This wasn't
even the only popular music album to carry this title in 2005, let alone over
all time.
:That's what the disambiguation page is for. Of course there are other Lost and Founds, but each article should be dedicated to a specific one.--BennyD 02:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Lost and Founds 

message: Lost and Found → Lost and Found (Mudvayne album) — There are many uses of the term "Lost and Found", and I see no evidence that this album is more notable than the others listed at Lost and Found (disambiguation).  That disambiguation page could then be moved to Lost and Found. Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 09:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
#Support per nomination, but see also my comment below. PC78 11:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments:
*There's also Lost And Found and Lost & Found, both of which contain articles, but should probably be redirects to the dab page. PC78 11:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move #1 (Mudvayne album) 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
#Support per nomination, but see also my comment below. PC78 11:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support per nomination, but see also my comment below. PC78 11:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: :Add any additional comments:
*There's also Lost And Found and Lost & Found, both of which contain articles, but should probably be redirects to the dab page. PC78 11:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
*Support, per nomination. PC78 23:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *Support, per nomination. PC78 23:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
*Support, per nomination. PC78 23:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *Support, per nomination. PC78 23:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: :Image:LostAndFound.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:LostAndFound.JPG

message: :Image:Mudvayne lost and found.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mudvayne lost and found.jpg

message: One of the sources used is "sea of tranquility". I'm not sure if this source is reliable, it looks like some sort of amateur webzine. Can anyone confirm this? I call the big one bitey 06:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is currently a discussion going on the talk page about the use of this website. You can read it here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source? 

message: Before adding genres to this article, we need to find reliable sources for it. Can we find some discussing this album in particular? Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pretty clear that this album is progressive metal. Why fight the sources? --68.185.2.134 (talk) 20:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What sources? Binksternet (talk) 02:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: Non-professional reviewer. Not a reliable source. --68.185.2.34 (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this much is correct. However, the edit you're talking about removed about 5 other sources as well, including many reliable ones. Please be more careful in your editing in the future. You should not removed all of these. Sergecross73 msg me 18:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sputnikmusic 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lost and Found (Mudvayne album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117030057/https://jam.canoe.com/Music/Artists/M/Mudvayne/AlbumReviews/2005/04/28/1016981.html to https://jam.canoe.com/Music/Artists/M/Mudvayne/AlbumReviews/2005/04/28/1016981.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100907052837/http://www.vh1.com/news/articles/1497672/03022005/mudvayne.jhtml to http://www.vh1.com/news/articles/1497672/03022005/mudvayne.jhtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140109180037/http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/online_downloads/mudvayne_fall_into_sleep_video_online.html to http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/online_downloads/mudvayne_fall_into_sleep_video_online.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lost and Found (Mudvayne album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150904024728/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php to http://riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?&artist=mudvayne
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080129151648/http://mixonline.com/news/audio_dave_fortman_produce/ to http://mixonline.com/news/audio_dave_fortman_produce/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521211654/http://music.ign.com/articles/606/606036p1.html to http://music.ign.com/articles/606/606036p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified