Talk:Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex - Solid State Society

message: When is it coming out?  I'm very eager to see it!  --Cyde↔Weys 03:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Who put the "Q1 2007" their? Has it been stated that that is around the time they'll release it? --Rebirth 01:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: I'm surprised Ned Scott didn't propose this page to merge into the main SAC page also... I'd oppose such a merger though. 132.205.93.88 23:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It hasn't come out yet, so.. I wasn't sure what to say about it... also, your oppositions is lacks logic. -- Ned Scott 05:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does it lack logic? It is a feature film with a new plot. Check out any film and you will see that sequels have different pages from the first film. Why this personal crusade to merge all under the sky? (pun intended) --Energman 17:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ... you seem to be confused, I am not in favor of merging this article. -- Ned Scott 06:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: you said "your opposition lacks logic" (edited to be readable). I say his opposition can be backed up--Energman 09:16, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, didn't notice my typo. I was talking about his opposition on other GITS articles. I do not disagree with him on the matter of this article. -- Ned Scott 09:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No merge?

message: poster, this one is probably an early version. Cliché Online 17:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: alternative poster

message: A lot of the plot section is taken directly from http://www.productionig.com/contents/works_sp/47_/index.html. It needs to be written. kollision 15:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The rewritten plot section contains numerous errors, some quite large. As an example, the plot section says "The Tachikoma kept a record of the Major's conversation with Koshiki, but insisted it had no value after Koshiki died. Batou's own memory of the conversation may have been altered." whereas the actual scene (per the official english sub and dub) says that the Tachikomas SHOULD have a record of the conversation, but claim that it was erased in the white out when he died. It is, in fact, Batou that says that while he was also listening to the conversation (his exact words are "Yeah, sort of"), it doesn't matter anymore. So, as you can see, the plot section is just confused about what's actually going on in places. Other problems would include using different spelling (Siak instead of Seok, for example) than the official translation, or even completely different terms or incorrect translations ("Kifu Aged", a half-translation, instead of "Noble Rot Senior Citizen", the official translation which even has a line of dialog explaining why they use the term). Somebody who has the time should go over the plot section to try to weed out these kinds of errors. Guspaz 09:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm editing it back. It's not appropriate to refer to Kugutsu Mawashi as 'the Puppeteer', because the Puppeteer is another character within the Ghost in the Shell canon, and it's never stated (or even directly implied) that the Puppeteer and Kugutsu Mawashi are the same character. Wait for an official translation. TankRamp 21:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Added: Also, I know the other character's name is technically 'the Puppet Master', and not 'the Puppeteer', but they're close enough to be confusing. I think character confusion is a bigger deal than having to read romaji. Of course, if the final translation is 'the Puppeteer', we can always change it back. TankRamp 22:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Puppeteer is what the English release uses. Argel1200 00:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio on plot section

message: Since the Tachikoma were 'destroyed' in the ending of 2nd Gig, I believe that listing the Tachikoma on the Voice Cast is kind of giving up the plot of the movie (they 'reappear' halfway of the movie), and therefore should be removed from the voice cast list, or listed as ??? or something. Just a thought. 201.153.114.233 04:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hay, thanks for shining that big old spotlight on the very detailed spoiler there, jerk.  The spoiler section lists a very rudimentary plot outline, I see no relevant details.  I wouldn't have noticed if you hadn't pointed it out.  I figured they would be back, but the hows, whens, and whys, I would have preferred to see the film.  Thanks again.  Love, Tarkaan 00:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hardly a spoiler. At the end of 2nd Gig, they shove their memories on the net. The "how" of them coming back is the major saying pretty much "I found them on the net", and that's it. That's not a spoiler, that's barely even a plot point. So, the how is only a spoiler if you consider the fact that they're back at all a spoiler. Convoluted logic, perhaps, but the point is that they gloss over everything except the fact that they're back so much so that them being back is the only thing that matters. Guspaz 09:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers out of spoilers section

message: I'm not terribly sure how to do this, but can someone redirect the Rhizome link under Trivia from the botanical term to the philosophical? It seems more appropriate. - Eltargrim (Sorry, stealth edit)
:Fixed.  Jez crow 18:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixing Links

message: Anyone else notice that this movie is a remake of the first Ghost in the Shell film but adapted to the Stand Alone Complex storyline with several plot changes?
:There were some things that did homage to the original, but that's about it. Fatalis 15:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed the series has always payed homage to the original movie. --76.84.18.123 (talk) 22:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Striking Resemblance

message: (Based largely on discussion I found over three pages here, http://forums.animesuki.com/showthread.php?t=33978
I would like to add the following explanation of the story: Jez crow 20:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's really interesting, and I was wondering about that, too.  If you can get a more respectable source than a forum (from personal experience I know that the best analysis often comes from forums, but it's Wikipedia policy not to list forums as a source), it would be okay to include it as a plot interpretation in the main article, I think.  The summary would probably have to be shorter though, linking to the full theory at the source. TankRamp 15:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree with this interpretation and feel that mention of this alternate view should at least be mentioned in some form in the summary. - Chris, Devoted GITS fan. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.105.153.44 (talk) 18:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks.  Also I made some snapshots from the film which kind of support the theory.  Basically if you look of the rack of remotes when Motoko (as Chroma) returns to her safehouse there are 3 spaces:  Chroma, Young Motoko, and the Civil Servant (from right to left).  This is shown (proved?) when K.M. hacks her memory.  In his final scene, he (the Civil Servant) steps out of the rack, after it pans across showing all Motoko's remotes and who goes where.  Jez crow 23:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I think the picture should definitely be included.  It clarifies the theory.  I also saw the interpretation sections in the wiki pages for Lynch's films (is there an overlap between GITS fans and Lynch fans?) and thought they added a lot to the entries.  I personally don't have any problem with interpretation sections, especially when they're as well-substantiated as this one is.  I was only worried about editors coming in who are bigger sticklers for policy.  When it comes down to it, though, this seems to be a fairly straight-forward, fact-based explanation of the plot, rather than an artistic interpretation.  If the Lynch interpretations can stay up, this one certainly can.  I guess it's good that it's put out there with a little bit of a disclaimer, since there's still a chance the theory isn't totally spot on, but probably nobody will have a problem with it.  Good add. TankRamp 23:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

text: This should go?  Why?  As it is wrong or because this is inappropriate?  Surely the test is if someone finds it worthwhile reading?  Anyway, cheers!
Can't wait for the Official release with official translation!  (Also a better image too)  Hopefully it will be less cryptic than the fansub.  For instance, apparently there is a line missing where Motoko tells Batou she found the Tachikomas' Memory Files in cyberspace, after she saves Togusa.  Then we will know.  Jez crow 01:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The identity of the mysterious hacker behind Kugutsu Mawashi.

message: The scene where Batou and the Major point guns at eachother seems to mirror the scene in Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocense, where they do the same. 
Another thing is, the black cat that seems to hack the cyborg in the robotic suit's eyes, could possible be a homage to the black cat in The Matrix trilodgy. (In the GitS:SAC:2nd Gig trivia it actually states that they pay homage to the helicopter matrix scene, most likely because The Matrix was inspired in part by the first Ghost in the Shell movie.) It's not too far of a stretch but I don't want to add it if someone's just going to remove it.
142.163.43.250 13:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Trivia? 

message: :Image:Ghost In The Shell SAC Solid State Society DVD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just placed fair use rationale on the image description page. --Kyoko 12:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ghost In The Shell SAC Solid State Society DVD.jpg

message: The article has been edited to state that the Sci Fi channel aired this widescreen....but I could have sworn it wasn't. The image that they uploaded could have been easily edited/cropped to make it look widescreen, but I don't know why someone would intentionally lie like this.
:I watched it when it came on and it was fullscreen. I remember being very disapointed that it was shown fullscreen and not widescreen, becuase i personally prefer widescreen. 151.203.145.104 06:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sci-Fi airing 

message: Hi, just wondered why the names have changed?  Kagael and Karam don't sound very Japanese?  Have they changed in the English translation, because in previous GitS all the names are Japanese?  I haven't seen the English dub.
Was thinking of changing them back to the original Japanese names.
Tx Jez crow 12:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The official translation names them as "Ka Gael" and "Ka Rum" (their names are even part of the titles of chapters 1 and 3 on the DVD, "Death of Colonel Ka Gael" and "Pandora's Box ~Infiltration of Ka Rum's Mansion"). So neither verseion is correct. But then again, the article gets most of the names wrong. The official name is "Raj Puhto" (Chapter 13, "The 14th Man ~Tailing Raj Puhto"), but the article has "Raj Poot". There are a ton of such errors in the article. Somebody should go through the official translation and correct these mistakes. Guspaz 09:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  I think the incorrect names are those from the fansub.  However, I did wonder about that 'l' in Gael.  I didn't think Japanese used this letter.  I guess they are supposed to Malaysian, but I don't know anything about that.  It's irrelevant I guess.  Cheers.  Jez crow 12:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names change of Ka Gae Ru and Ka Ruma 

message: the article say Hideo Kuze no longer loved her... i didn't recall this, they have a special childhood bond but not much were said about them. The supported reason of her leaving should instead be due to the inability of PS9 to save him; a more likely reason to "take it out on the system" and quit. Akinkhoo 12:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hideo Kuze 

message: :Image:GITS-SSS air.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GITS-SSS air.jpg

message: :Image:GITS-SAC-SSS rack of remotes.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GITS-SAC-SSS rack of remotes.png

message: :Image:GITS-SAC-SSS rack of remotes.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GITS-SAC-SSS rack of remotes.png

message: :Image:GITS-SSS air.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GITS-SSS air.jpg

message: Could someone update this to use the terms in the Official translated version rather than the current terms - eg. Puppeteer rather than Kugutsu Mawashi, Noble Rot Senior rather than Kifu Aged/Old-aged, etc.  Antisora 15:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated Terms 

message: :Image:Ghost In The Shell SAC Solid State Society DVD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ghost In The Shell SAC Solid State Society DVD.jpg

message: Just made a small edit for the ending quote, its not "Then net is indeed vast and infinite", but "The net is truly vast and infinite."--Aridnyk 13:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Small Edit

message: i'm not good with adding production info into the article i have found a source though that could help expand it. for me, it'll take all day just to find what is key info. .Bread Ninja (talk) 23:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: production info

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex - Solid State Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.rightstuf.com/1-800-338-6827/catalogmgr/72hYLZm%3DbCx2lLpyDv/browse/item/73295/4/0/0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111029003913/http://www.mania.com/ghost-shell-stand-alone-complex-solid-state-society-awarded-jury-prize-21st-digital-content-grand-prix_article_85222.html to http://www.mania.com/ghost-shell-stand-alone-complex-solid-state-society-awarded-jury-prize-21st-digital-content-grand-prix_article_85222.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified