lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cornificia

message: I could be very well mistaken on how I am referencing this, so please show me where I should put the reference since I know you are very knowledgable on things like this. On page 174 of Brown's translation it reads,
...and to have been just as celebrated as her brother Cornificius, a renowned poet of the same period. She was not satisfied with having, thanks to her splendid talent, merely a way with words. I think that the sacred Muses inspired her to use her learned pen in the composition of verses worthy of Helicon. Rejecting the distaff, Cornificia wrote many notable epigrams still held in esteem at the time of St. Jerome, as he himself attests. 
Then on page 175 it continues with,
....By means of talent and hard work she succeeded in rising above her sex, and with her splendid effort she acquired for herself fame that is perpetual and rare precisely because it stands for an excellence few men have equalled. 
The wording in the article says it is Boccaccio saying this, so it looks to me to be saying essentially about the same thing, but in two different ways translated off Boccaccio. Your's is Guarino's translation and mine is Brown's, however I believe they both refer to the same quote. That could be the wording of Guarino's translation (I don't know) but the article did not say this was Guarino's wording, just ...which says of her..., which to me is Boccaccio speaking. If after this explanation you still feel it is not correct, then just leave it out - I have no objection. You would be the better judge on this.--Doug talk 12:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indeed, Doug, two translations of the Latin of Boccaccio. I have Guarino's, which is the one I quoted in the article, though not in full. Frankly, Boccaccio isn't a primary or secondary source for Cornificia, but we have so little on her that I put it in. I think it's fair, at least, to mention Boccaccio's (and Laura Cereta's) interest in Cornificia, but there's no need for more than the citation of the translation used. Xn4 17:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to quotation of Virginia Brown's translation
Talk:Warwal

message: in this village main tribe is kahoot quraish.river sawa is flowing near the village.two pakistani military aircrafts have crashed in this village.attar behari vajpae is one of famous personalities of the village which is the former prime minister of india.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.5.143.130 (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Feral donkeys in Australia

message: As a project for my university writing class, I've been asked to revise a Wikipedia article. So far, I've made several revisions and additions to this page. The first thing I did was go through the page and add sections to the page where there were previously only small headings followed by colons to denote a change in topic. I felt this was important to visually divide up the article, even though it is not a large one, and help viewers easily and quickly fine the exact information they were looking for. I also added a picture to make the page more visually pleasing. The last important revision I've made was to begin adding links to other Wikipedia pages in the article to help people get a broader understanding of the topic and for ease of navigation. I will continue adding more links on words I feel are important or may need clarification. I also plan to add some citation to the article to give it some credibility which it is currently lacking.
ChelseaW (talk) 17:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Social Democracy (Czech Republic)

message: This article needs a section describing the ideology and program of the Czech Social Democratic Party. There is nothing about this here. Any article about a political party should describe what that party stands for! Also the introductory paragraph should be much more informative. One short sentence is not enough. The article on the Civic Democratic Party (Czech Republic) is a good model.
-- Sendube, 27.08.2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sendube (talk • contribs) 09:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: People should not hide the fact that this party supports Genocide. In a deleted Facebook Post this party has called for genocide against the Roma people, and for harm against migrants. Members of this party have run on campaigns that support Genocide and ethnic cleansing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.66.245.58 (talk) 07:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support of Genocide 

message: The ČSSD just revealed a return to their original logo… for a month. Should that be relfected in the article? If so, how? SparksRain (talk) 11:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  145th anniversary logo 
Talk:Czech Socialist Republic

message: An article called "Czech Socialist Republic" cannot be used for the Czech Republic between 1990-1992 , when it was part of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic. One needs to create a separate article for this short , "non-socialist" period.Cpt.schoener (talk) 10:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject of the article:Not Socialist between 1990-1992

message: This setting of infobox
|event_end   = Independence
|date_end    = 1 January
|year_end    = 1993
results in correct "history" part of infobox:
* Independence 1 January 1993 
But also shows 
← 1969–1993 →
And we do not want 1993 here, that's incorrect.   maybe you can help, you are interested in Czech* stuff. Thanks. Chrzwzcz (talk) 18:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1992 / 1993 

message: * Miloslava Knappová: Česko = Česká socialistická republika [Czechia = Czech Socialist Republic]. Naše řeč 1983;66(4), URL: http://nase-rec.ujc.cas.cz/archiv.php?art=6404  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.168.13.101 (talk) 20:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Chechia was not used in English back then and is barely used now. --Khajidha (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Czech Socialist Republic was from 1 January 1969 to 5 March 1990 the official name of Czechia. 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. There is a clear consensus to revert to the original title. I do however encourage a separate discussion about Peter11700's legitimate concern that half of this article is about a non–socialist republic. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 13:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Czech Socialist Republic (1969–1990)/Czech Republic (1990–1992) → ? – Don't know what a good title for this article should be, but the existing title is unsightly and an unlikely search term. It seems that this name was chosen as this article covers two time periods of this state, in which the state had different names. If moved, Slovak Socialist Republic (1969–1990)/Slovak Republic (1990–1992) should also be moved. Natg 19 (talk) 07:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  From the edit history, Peter1170 gave this reason for the moves:  "The article is not only about Czech Socialist Republic within Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, but also about Czech Republic within Czech and Slovak Federative Republic. Thats pretty big historical difference". Natg 19 (talk) 17:12, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Move to literally any other title that isn't this hideous abomination. Gonnym (talk) 09:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 July 2021
Talk:Green Economics

message: I think merger into Ecological economics is a great idea. I tagged Green Economics for a copyright violation, but it is actual cut word for word from one or two sources and pasted together with what appears to be original research or at least original conclusions. --Evb-wiki (talk) 18:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fundamentally disagree with this. Ecological economics is a specific aspect of Green economics, which is much wider and includes ecological economics (which focuses on within system theory and environmental science), localism green anarchism, eco-socialism, green libertarianism and so many more. This is a really bad move. Yes, the article before wasn't very good, but please reconsider this change. Aled Dilwyn Fisher (talk) 01:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because one or two websites claim to represent "Green economics" doesn't mean it exists as a field. It's not notable. It's not economics. There's no research done in green economics. Stop trying to create an economics field. All of those "green" movements could be incorporated into a "green movement" article, or may be better located as sections in each of their articles. But I've never heard of any of what you're talking about, and you can't just write up original research. I've got a B.A. in economics. OptimistBen (talk) 08:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Of course, because Green Economics is rife with copyright violations, It cannot stand as written. It would need a complete rewrite to maintiain the article. Unless that is done, merging the usable text into Ecological economics (assuming it is new and adds to the verified context) would be a way to salvage the article's data. --Evb-wiki (talk) 04:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just thought I'd point out that Green economics (without capital "e") currently redirects to Ecological economics, which was part of my reasoning for proposing the merger.  --Dawn bard (talk) 13:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Green_economics. The result was delete. Glance at it and you'll see that there was a major copyright violation. The current information, on the other hand, is not really notable and should be merged with Ecological economics. OptimistBen (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article for Deletion
Talk:9th New Jersey Infantry Regiment

message: Major revision to this article posted on March 15, 2009 in an attempt to upgrade the quality of the article. --Marksdaly (talk) 18:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nicely done. shirulashem (talk) 11:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In this edit, an IP user posted "New Jersey State Archives, Civil War Treasury Vouchers, 1861-1865; National Archives and Records Administration(NARA), Civil War Service Records" attached to the  tag in #Hubbs, Ethelbert (2LT), breaking the tag. I leave it to the regular editors of this article to determine if that is a valid cite and deal with it appropriately. Anomie⚔ 23:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hubbs, Ethelbert (2LT)
Talk:Exchange-traded note

message: This article is NPOV, well written and informative.--Purpleslog (talk) 18:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Bold text (my emphasis) in this section refers to an "Appendix A" that doesn't appear in the article?
The returns of ETNs are linked to the performance of a market benchmark or strategy, less investor fees. Currently, there are four types of ETNs, Commodity ETNs, Emerging Market ETNs, Currency ETNs and Strategies ETNs available in the market. (Please refer to Appendix A for a list of available products in each category.)
75.51.188.235 (talk) 05:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of ETNs 

message: It also mentions a 'Chapter 3' that isn't present either. The contents seem to be copied from some other source that is no cited. At the very least, it should cite the source, as the content is useful, if not original.
Thebigjc (talk) 12:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chapter 3 missing

message: "nifty"? this language is not encyclopedia, and the article reeks of copy/paste copyright violation. Either that or it was somebody's homework assignment. Uucp (talk) 16:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic language/copyright violation

message: One article on Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs) duplicates another.
*The more current version:
Exchange-traded_note
*The older version:
Exchange_Traded_Note
The problem does not occur on all browsers.
Wiki sp editor (talk) 12:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate article

message: Does someone have time to add ETN fraud to this article? A "Controversies" section should be created. It may help retail investors be more informed. Watch "How The Biggest Banks Get Away With Fraud" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSh8eusFYL4
Chris goulet (talk) 05:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ETN fraud
Talk:Pearl tapioca

message: Are these same tapioca pearls that are used in Taiwanese Bubble Tea? Readin (talk) 18:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Wheel of Fortune (Philippine game show)

message: See also Wheel_of_Fortune_%28game_show%29_in_different_countries#Philippines. Don't know if this article is necessary or could be merged into the other.
Oh Snap (talk) 18:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC
202.90.135.8 (talk) 03:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Accept the fact that there are two version that are very similar in many respects. Additions in the ABS-CBN version will be only on the additional sections. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 07:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Stackhouse Filibuster

message: I don't think this is actually how filibusters take place in the U.S. Senate.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster#United_States
It might be interesting to add this fact as a note.
 -EconMajor — Preceding unsigned comment added by EconMajor (talk • contribs) 18:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the bill being filibustered was "The Family Wellness Act". Schissel | Sound the Note! 00:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure where to add, but
Talk:Kleagle

message: He calls himself the "grand kaliff", maybe he was the king kleagle earlier, but I do not have a reference.
*Reverend A. M. Young of the New Jersey Ku Klux Klan
Gay anal 2A02:C7E:315C:C600:48B0:DBA2:609B:7BFB (talk) 16:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Young
Talk:Naval history of the Netherlands

message: In my honest opinion this article and especially the word war 2 part should be expanded quite a bit.
As it now only states that the Dutch navy suffered heavy during the war, however this is a logical result as the Netherlands was at war with is home lands occupied by the Nazi Germany. however I don't know enough on the subject to do it myself therefore I hope some else can.NH-obi (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded 
Talk:(613766) 2007 NC7

message: No one to my knowledge dares to classify it as plutino (short arc orbit observation). Well established orbit does not always help, however. Compare  a well behaved “classical object” (DES classification) in .. 2:3 resonance. Eurocommuter (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 2002 KX14 does have an approximate 2:3 resonance.  It is in a nearly circler orbit (e=0.04) with a nearly zero inclination (i=0.4).  2002 KX14 does not appear as if it radically interacted with the orbit of Neptune, and thus its orbit is may not be fully controlled by Neptune (a requirement to be a plutino).  A lot of plutinos have their more eccentric orbits maintained by Neptune. (2002 KX14 JPL orbit diagram) -- Kheider (talk) 19:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it's definitely not a plutino. See: http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~buie/kbo/astrom/07NC7.html . Observations at a second opposition give a=33.7+-0.5 au  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.200.248.54 (talk) 13:20, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Centaur? A plutino? SDO? 
Talk:Superpipe

message: "Superpipe is a multi-purpose composite pipe..."
See: Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products, or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, will be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies.
The inclusion of an external URL seems like a blatant ploy to boost search engine rankings.
2008-02-28: This is the third time I've had to clean this article up. Apparently the message isn't getting across...
--Deprogram (talk) 23:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superpipe: A Multi-Layer Composite Pipe 
Talk:Out Stealing Horses

message: I must admit that the thought that there was an incestuous (i.e., sexual) relationship between the two never even occurred to me. So - what's with that?
Zegormjol (talk) 04:43, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the basis for the assertion that  "Ellen visits Trond in his home. ''They begin an incestuous relationship''."? 

message: Is this really so important as to warrant inclusion in an encyclopedic article? To me it looks rather random, commenting on one angle out of many possible angles. __meco (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with the long author quote in the lede? 

message: I can see where Plot may be preferable to Chronology but the plot has several threads intertwined. Chronology is more correct for this list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.191.211 (talk) 00:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was Chronology changed to Plot?
Talk:New Ulm High School

message: The spelling and editing of this page are ATROCIOUS. Which is rather disturbing given that it is an educational institution.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpmath (talk • contribs) 02:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My husband lives in Arizona and cant remember his 
New Ulm HS fight song lyrics.
I have tried to find them without any luck. Can you help?
Thank you so much.
Sherry 71.223.133.153 (talk) 05:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Victory Song Lyrics
Talk:Communist League

message: The inclusion of a Soviet-style hammer and sickle in this article is grossly anachronistic and should be replaced with something that members of the league would have recognized and used...maybe even a simple red flag.  
Regardless of the politics behind the inclusion of this absurd artifact, it is misleading and not up to the standards of honesty to which this series should strive.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MLause (talk • contribs) 16:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Somebody, please update the hyperlink for Ferdinand Wolff. Currently it points to Ferdinand Wolf (one F). That is a different person.
69.178.112.136 (talk) 00:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Wolff link wrong
Talk:Melicious

message: 'A promotional short film was created to promote the album called Behind the Muse'. You can currently find 'Part 1' of this mocumentary on youtube here: . Part 2 however is nowhere to be found. I'd like to at least verify the information in this documentary, which would require seeing part 2. The second half of the film might also have some interesting information for the article. If anyone knows where you can view, download or even buy this film let me know. Freikorp (talk) 11:59, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've since located a full copy of the film,  which includes a serious interview at the end. And yes, it did provide some useful information for the article. The documentary, which was released on June 11, 2001 stated Melicious was scheduled for release on August 21, 2001, contradicting the information in this article which stated the album was due for release on September 11, insinuating its cancellation had something to do with the terrorist attacks (which I always thought was extremely dubious as if it was scheduled for release on September 11 and canceled due to the attacks, thousands of copies would have already been delivered to stores in the days before September 11, yet no such copies are anywhere to be found). Freikorp (talk) 05:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behind the muse mocumentary
Talk:Institute of the Czech Language

message: "Note from Czech people: Czech language institute is not regulatory body of the Czech language. The one has no rights to control or regulate Czech language. This Institute caused several hard lapses in past. For example: In 1993 Czech Minister for education Ivan Pilip has officially cancelled and fixed the rules of Czech language from Czech language Institute. Many Czech people protested against the work of Czech Language Institute.
Czech language institute has only passive role. The one only passive collects and researches the spontaneous evolution of Czech language. Czech language institute can determine rules for Czech language only for schools, not for official Czech language.
Czech language institute changes rules for Czech language very very often, many times per century. Every Czech people meets several significant changes of Czech language – that's why (together with lapses) this instutute haven't authority to regulate Czech language."
these are not adequate for Wikipedia. 1) they are very poorly written; 2) they are personal comments. any factual content needs to be reviewed, rewriteen and properly referenced. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleted comments on article 

message: Although my short new text is only about 80%-sourced, it is factually correct and should not spark any controversy. If I come across relevant references, I will add them. On the legal status, there seem to be no texts online, and also, note how the Institute itself avoids the issue on its website. Littledogboy (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the rewrite, I'm just not sure what is meant by "scientific and popularization publishing" in the first sentence and have tagged it as such. - filelakeshoe 20:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, thanks for the proofread, I should take better care. Explained what you requested. Littledogboy (talk) 18:52, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten 
Talk:G6

message: Simply because allot of people are searching G6 because of the song, it should be made obvious what this reefers too. 
Update: added this- there has been some confusion because the howitzer in this regard.--68.42.67.169 (talk) 02:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Like a G6

message: The same airplane is listed under other and under engineering.  It should only be listed once.71.109.144.35 (talk) 01:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the Gulfstream 650 listed twice?
Talk:North Central High School (Spokane, Washington)

message: The demographics page is old. Please update it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akihironihongo (talk • contribs) 09:53, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  request to update demographics among other things
Talk:Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic

message: Please move this page, it was wrongly moved by mistake. Via Talk:Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic
--Mujdeda (talk) 17:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Venerable Stylianus

message: All clear.  Thanks.  Jc3schmi (talk) 19:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here from WP:CP. I couldn't find any copyvio, and the page is now removed from WP:CP. Please feel free to stubify the text or rereport if you can find the copyvio. The Evil Spartan (talk) 22:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vio
Talk:Constitution of the Czech Republic

message: Any possible future editor, pleas note, that this is the example of the rare case candidate article, for being translated from Czech Wikipedia. The Czech version right now is quite nicely covered and ref-sourced. --Reo + 20:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ...all of it, I wonder? Littledogboy (talk) 15:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Nick Waplington

message: At least one web page (http://www.fotohof.or.at/editions/biogr.cfm?fid=391) claims Waplington was born in London, and this article long claimed he was born in the U.K. somewhere, but Waplington himself wrote me and apparently that was incorrect info and the Aden birthplace is correct. SethTisue (talk) 19:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth
Talk:MHK Kežmarok

message: Fair use rationale completed. Flibirigit (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MHK Kezmarok.gif