Talk:Baseball (TV series)

message: Needs something about criticisms, especially from Olbermann and other baseball researchers. Westfall 05:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We had a very well written section pointing out the liberal bias, also the fact that it focused almost exclusively on New York, Boston, race relations, and the reserve clause, ignoring other aspects of baseball, but the Wikipedia censors removed it.John Paul Parks (talk) 15:07, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:Baseballburns.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Baseballburns.jpg

message: The 10th Inning section begins with "At a preview screening of his 2007 documentary The War, Ken Burns spoke of very possibly coming up to date in the history of baseball with a "10th Inning" episode of his Baseball documentary, and it can be found on the Florentine Films web site."  Besides being a poorly written run-on sentence, the reference for this sentence is a hyperlink to an interview with Ken Burns rather than the Florentine Films web site.  Just wondering what the best way to clean this up would be. Wickedjacob (talk) 11:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The blog interview should be moved to external links, since the new episode is not discussed there (unless I'm missing something).  After the "it can found" then a cite to the link to the florentine films website where you can "find it", if it exists.  Also, the "probable" topics paragraph should be removed as that is  original research. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing statement 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Baseball (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070831232559/http://blogs.trb.com:80/news/local/morningnews/blog/2007/08/10th_inning_with_ken_burns.html to http://blogs.trb.com/news/local/morningnews/blog/2007/08/10th_inning_with_ken_burns.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified