lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Waneta Hoyt

message: I think that the very small number of Google hits belies the claim that she had a significant impact on the study of SIDS. --David.Mestel 15:52, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Sudden infant death syndrome]]

message: "Some new studies say that bla bla bla..."
What studies?  I think a citation is needed here.  That's a pretty big statistic to be throwing around with no solid back up. 68.116.143.113 06:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New studies? 

message: Does anyone else feel this article is severely under developed? There must be more information than this. 67.169.57.180 (talk) 11:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacking information...
Talk:Administrative divisions of Nenets Autonomous Okrug

message: Unlike the rest of the articles in the series, this one covers municipal entities as opposed to the administrative divisions.  Please exercise care when using this information for comparison purposes.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 15:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-written the article so the accuracy concerns have been addressed.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy
Talk:William S. Hart High School

message: Wikipedia articles on schools normally don't include staff members beyond the principals, or sometimes a notable faculty member or longtime coaches. Among the reasons are that such lists go out of date and that they become the targets of vandals. Those are good reasons here too. Let's cut it down to just the senior staff. -Will Beback · † · 07:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel 

message: I see the article has been tagged as unreferenced. I've added fact tags to various items in the article. This is not to challenge the veracity of the statements, but as a guideline to show the areas where an inline citation to a reliable source would help improve the article. Arthur 18:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Jak II

message: "The game is notorious among gamers for being one of the most difficult games on the PlayStation 2."
How has this made it onto the page without a single source? There is no evidence for this whatsoever.
Also, how is the game both a sequel and a prequel? Is anyone checking this page or what? 2A02:C7F:A0DB:E300:499E:550F:8CE1:F698 (talk) 22:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited claims
Template talk:Electoral systems

message: My suggestion for values is: plurality, proportional, mixed, other. This makes it possible to expand individual sections on relevant pages. 93.182.179.223 (talk) 16:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add listNname parameters 

message: The positional voting page incorporates this template but is not listed within it. Using this template, it is possible to navigate from positional voting to other electoral systems but not to navigate back to it.
Examples of positional voting electoral systems include the Borda count, the Nauru/Dowdall method and the Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) one. However, the Borda count employs an arithmetic progression of weightings whereas the Nauru/Dowdall method uses a harmonic progression instead and the ESC uses neither type. The latter two are sometimes called ‘variants’ of the Borda count but this word is unfortunate since the properties of different types of weighting progressions generate quite different ranking outcomes.
The Borda count is well known for being a system that promotes consensual candidates. At the other extreme, plurality (which can be analysed using positional weightings of 1, 0, 0, …, 0) promotes polarised candidates. Intermediate weightings (see here) between these two extremes often produce markedly different election outcomes. Referring to any positional voting system (or plurality!) as a ‘variant’ or ‘modified’ Borda count is simply misleading. The Nauru/Dowdall and ESC voting systems are accurately defined as positional voting ones but much less well as ‘sort-of’ Borda count ones.
Therefore, I would suggest amending this template as follows. Replace ‘Borda count’ with ‘Positional voting (Borda count, Nauru/Dowdall method, Eurovision Song Contest)’.Mencor (talk) 08:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Add link to positional voting within this template

message: Change the label of the link to "CPO-STV" to say "CPO-STV" or "CPO" instead of "Wright". Icebound Alpaca (talk) 02:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Mvqr (talk) 11:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2022 

message: There are 4 main categories of single-winner systems:
# Sequential-loser methods like IRV: take the "biggest losers" of one method (like plurality) and delete them from the list of candidates. Iterate on this to rank candidates from worst-to-best. Includes IRV, Coombs, and Condorcet elimination.
# Round-robin systems: compare every pair of candidates to each other to create a pairwise matrix. Use this matrix to select a winner. Includes most Condorcet methods, but not all (Nanson's, Baldwin, and Alternative Smith are biggest-loser methods).
# Positional systems: Every candidate gets a certain number of points depending on their position on the ballot. Includes Plurality, Nauru, and Borda.
# Rated systems: Every candidate gets a rating. Includes highest medians, highest averages, approval, and STAR.
Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: 4-part classification
Talk:Mildred Pierce (film)

message: :Well, you've done it again—a completely pointless split into two articles, again without adding any content, so that the article on the film only consists of a comparison with the novel and the article on the novel has been classified as "start" because it lacks the content from the other article. Anyone really interested in the article should access an earlier version, such as http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mildred_Pierce&oldid=18658676 . <KF> 22:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article split novel/film

message: *  ... plot synopsis, review, cast, production credits, awards
Reference available for citing in the article body. Erik (talk) 20:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Allmovie

message: That long list of books to read, why are they not used in the article, to add to the analysis of the movie and serve as inline citations? There is more to say about that story.  I just added 2 sources on the Hays code to clear away the citation needed flag on how film directors were limited or guided by the Hays code, and required punishment for crimes,and no glorifying of crime. —Prairieplant (talk) 23:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading list, incorporate into article
Talk:Chevrolet Cheyenne (concept car)

message: I drive an older Chevy Cheyenne, a late 80s/early 90s model.  From what I gather the Cheyenne is not a concept car; it has existed before, only Chevrolet stopped producing them during the mid-90s.  I have seen pictures of various older model years of the Cheyenne on some web sites; the Cheyenne shown in the picture is just the concept for the next version Chevy wants to produce from what I can tell.  134.114.59.41 16:15, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  O RLY?
Talk:Saint Barbara

message: for the worlwide fans of Molière, or a page 
=== Arouet, François === ?
Mrtialis 17:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jean - Baptiste Poquelin 

message: These dates can't be correct.  How is it that Barbara was born in c. 300?  This very same article says she was killed in c. 306.  Do the math and that would make her six years old, maybe five.  The Catholic Community Forum states that Barbara died in c. 235.  If it is uncertain then the exact dates should be removed.
: My references (http://www.artillery.net) all indicate that these are approximations.  Thus, I recommend that we remove exact dates and state that she lived around 300 AD.  (Brent Woods 23:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Her thoughtless inclusion in WikipediaProjectBiography is a reminder of how many ways one can waste one's time at Wikipedia.--Wetman (talk) 04:55, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth/Death?!? 

message: According to one source, http://www.cmea-agmc.ca/redbook/CME_Customs_Ch03_e.pdf, the military engineers do not actually have St Barbara as their official patron saint, but do often participate in artillery celebrations honouring her.  Can anyone comment?  (Brent Woods 23:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patronage question 

message: In Santeria, St Barbara is associated with Shango, the Sky Father.Lily20 (talk) 17:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shango 

message: I am wondering if she is still in the Martyrology, having been removed from universal celebration. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "removed from the liturgical calendar" 

message: she is not a saint anymore  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.109.143.200 (talk) 02:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  barbara  

message: The Brazilian composer Fatima Guedes wrote and recorded a dramatic and appealing song about her - Santa Barbara - a favorite piece of mine.--Tofindya (talk) 05:06, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa Barbara - The Song 

message: Where do we find out how St. Brbara died? 66.85.230.215 (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbara's death 

message: Might just be a bogus story about the transfer of the patron saint of field artillery relics to the US by the patriarch of the orthodox schism right before the Maya apocalypse. Could find no reference to it elsewhere, e.g. here: https://en.standrewuoc.com 85.145.190.188 (talk) 11:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbara relics
Talk:Lauren Goodnight

message: Hopefully I've excised the most egregious displays of inappropriate tone in this article.  Her liking Samuel L Jackson isn't quite notable enough for a Wikipedia article.  Cheers! -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 16:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither User:Hurpaderp nor User:VoxAngelique have any contributions whatsoever outside the talk page for this article.  Be aware that Wikipedia:Sock puppetry is not only discouraged; it can get you banned.  Please refrain from creating Wikipedia usernames specifically to trashtalk the subjects of Wikipedia articles. -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 10:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How is she a professional member of AASECT and Sexual Medicine Society of North America when she hasn't even finished a post-graduate degree in counseling yet, received certification, or medical licensing and her only "professional" claim is an internet call-in radio show where she dispenses advice uncertified and unlicensed and is actually just a student? Is there verification anywhere pointing to the fact that she has professional status?- Anon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.89.33.115 (talk) 20:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2014

message: I should probably have mentioned this beforehand; I know LG in real life, although I try to keep a neutral tone on this article. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI disclosure
Talk:Trial and conviction of Alfred Dreyfus

message: We need to say who Major Bexon d'Ormescheville represented, and who appointed him.  In general the I think the introduction should set the stage for someone who has not read the previous articles in the series. The tone of the whole article is still somewhat  antiquated. Rich  Farmbrough 16:22 3  May 2006 (UTC).
Please delete this ridiculously written article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.175.214 (talk) 16:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: I can't find a single source or citation in this article. I've added a unreferenced tag to the top as a result. Please add some sources for anything new or  anything already existing in this article. ResurgamII 13:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article has no sources
Talk:Rocky Mountain Fur Company

message: *I propose that Ashley's Hundred be merged into this article. They are both short and refer to the same topic. KudzuVine (talk) 18:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that this was done, but I think it should have been the other way around:  Ashley's Hundred should have been maintained, with Rocky Mountain Fur Company redirecting to it.  Ashley's Hundred was the first and more significant contributor to history.  Lynn (SLW) (talk) 13:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree; no one outside of a few specialists in the history of the fur trade has heard of Ashley's Hundred; the Rocky Mountain Fur Company is a well-known historic entity.  Per WP:COMMONNAME, this merge was correctly done.  Montanabw(talk) 00:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, well maybe with your sudden interest in the fur trade, you could find a source that says Kit Carson was once affiliated with the company.  I'm at a loss on that one.  Lynn (SLW) (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am interested in Montana history, seems that the fur trade article debate spilled over here. I was simply tweaking the lede to reflect the article body text; remove Carson if that info in the body of the article was incorrect, I didn't put it there.  I added a "cn" tag for your convenience.  As for your other assertion, truly no one has used "Ashley's hundred."  I have pointed out to you that WP:OR and WP:SYNTH are wikipedia policies, I am merely the messenger.  Montanabw(talk) 18:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not my assertion, it's a basic fact.  That everyone uses "Rocky Mountain Fur Company" for the three prior partnerships does not make it correct usage.  "Ashley's Hundred" really isn't correct as the name of the company, it was basically a nickname for the men he hired.  But it makes more sense to have an article called "Ashley's Hundred" that discusses each partnership and how the name "Rocky Mountain Fur Company" came to be.  A redirect from "Rocky Mountain Fur Company" would take readers to an article that accurately reflects the history, even if the preceeding article didn't.   Lynn (SLW) (talk) 19:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, when "everyone" includes a number of eminent historians with PhDs and such, this article is clearly WP:PRIMARY. I would suggest you go back and read WP:OR. Or take it to a dramaboard. Montanabw(talk) 19:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There's enough WP articles around that need upgrading I'm not going to bother trying to edit one that I don't agree with the basic premise of how it's set up.  If you want it improved, sounds like you have the resources you need at the Montana Historical Society to do so.  If you think I should, take your little WP: hammers and get out of my way. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 19:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: — Assignment last updated by Turtleduck71 (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Capstone-Fur Trade
Talk:Snooker world rankings 2006/2007

message: We have five players entering the top 32 but only four players dropping out! --Auximines 16:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quinten Hann is the 5th. --MartinUK 19:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top 33? 
Talk:Ox Baker

message: In the "Heart Punch Kills" section, the Alberto Torres whom is linked to is clearly not a pro-wrestler, so this is either vandalism, or something very incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zerojosh (talk • contribs) 00:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Alberto Torres

message: Added a little blurb about Baker's appearance on The Price Is Right.  Longshot1980 19:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game show contestant 

message: This article is almost exactly the same as the Ox Baker bio on Ox's website http://thelegendaryoxbaker.com/bio.html .  Did he copy it or is it plagarized here?
===I've noticed that===
I am kind of worried about that. --Staszu13 20:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is almost exactly the same 

message: I am kind of worried about that. --Staszu13 20:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I've noticed that

message: I was watching an old ICW video on Youtube where the bookers looked like clones of George Jefferson and some other 70's sitcom guy and Ox Baker was talking about how Ronnie Garland (I think thats his name) crushed his false teeth and he says "I love steak, not soup!" Why didn't the meat companies hire Ox? Thats alot better than Beef; It's whats for dinner. 69.159.54.59 13:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is(Tyler Warren's IP) I forgot to log in 69.159.54.59 13:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Funny Quote
Talk:Lotus berthelotii

message: Removed this from the article felt it should be discussed, placed it here 
This is not correct! Birds of the Phylloscopus-Group are active vistors of Lotus-Flowers! Even the worm looking friutrs of Lotus berthelotii are ditributed by these birds! Placed by [134.147.131.6]
 →ΣcoPhreekΔ 16:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Check J. Biogeogr. 31 p.1945-: "Bird-flower interactions in the Macaronesian Islands" to resolve. Dysmorodrepanis 17:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

message: More possible correcting; the current photo on the article page is of a plant that is often found in cultivation, but usually then called L. maculatus BREITFELD. The one usually found as bertholetii has flowers that are more reddish, and finer leaves. Whether they are different species, or subspecies, I don't know. Imc 19:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The photograph
Talk:The Big Break

message: Anyone else think it's time to split this article up?  It is becoming very long and hard to read.  IMO, much of the info in the sections for each season (i.e. contestant backgrounds, individual episode results, etc.) doesn't really belong in the main show article.  It would be pretty easy to make an article for each season (the 5th season section alone is currently almost 900 words long). -Big Smooth 16:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Time to split?

message: I like having all this info in one place. Then if people want more detail on a particular season or player, they can click on the link and go to a separate article. (BeingReal (talk) 22:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep it together

message: Is there criticism or some reception this show has got? Seems that no one (yet) got their "big break" from the show. The only one I know is Sophie Sandolo, and she is probably best known from her calendars. And she seems to be only one who's playing on a major tour. 82.141.73.206 (talk) 08:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception/Criticism?
Talk:Samothrace temple complex

message: In process of being ported from the Fr wiki by undersigned at User:Bridesmill/Sandbox Bridesmill 16:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: * The Great Mother <<currently some incongruities on the Mother Goddess related pages - this is best I could find (2 May 06), this may need updating>>, 
* Two other masculine deities accompany Kadmylos. <<The French article calls these the Cabires - but if this is the case, what about the intro which states that collectively the gods where all referred to as cabires??>>
* During a later period this same myth was associated with that of the marriage of Cadmos and Harmony, possibly due to a similarity of names to Kadmylos and Electra.<<This bullet is confusing - onomastia may relate Cadmos & Kadmylos - but how does that relate to Axiokersos & Hades?? - bit of a non-sequitur, plus the stories are different in any case>>
* Fr text states ptolemeion crosses western brook - this is patently the other way around
* C'est une sorte de temple, mais qui n'est pas périptère et ne comporte qu'une colonnade prostyle - lack of a periptery is not unusual, and by english definition, a prostyle only consists of a single row of four collumns - therefore the contradicting clause is, well, contradictory. Bridesmill 00:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Concerning Arsinoe II, I think you are in error. She marries Ptolemy Keraunos, her half-brother, ca. 280 BC, and Ptolemy II, her full brother, ca. 274. As for "de ce dernier", I think it refers to the ship. Jastrow 17:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation issues
Category talk:Wikipedia style guidelines

message: How can I add the logo in my blog?
:This is a question for the Wikipedia:Help desk. -- Beland 02:42, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This category seems to be to big. The most important guiedelines everybody needs to know are mixed with subject-specific guidelines for just small subset of articles. Practicaly nobody needs to know these but they are here and make looking for the most important guidelines more difficult. Thus I will create category Wikipedia subject-specific style guidelines and move first few such guidelines there. If there is no opposition I will continue with other policies. --Jan.Smolik 14:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject specific quidelines 

message: I'm not sure if this is the place to ask, but what are the guidelines, if any, on articles referred to vehicles and machinery? In particular, is the subject's brand suggested to be part of the name? Say, is an article about the Chevrolet Camaro supposed to be named plainly "Camaro" or is it meant to be called "Chevrolet Camaro"? If so, is there any writen guideline on the subject? Thanks in advance. uKER (talk) 00:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not many people watch this page.  Try WP:CAR. - Dank (push to talk) 00:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I just happened to find this. uKER (talk) 02:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guideline on vehicle/machinery article titles 

message: The era in which people can self-promote their pet guide line to MoS status without gaining consensus may be coming to an end. Please see this proposal to change the wording at this category. Tony (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major change is about to be proposed
Talk:American Chemistry Council

message: This is so POV!!! --Crio de la Paz 16:50, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, duh, ACC is literally a lobbyist “think tank”. Something that was considered treason and got one 20 years is prison, at least if you went by the law, back in the days. Before the media started to treat them like they are not, and it’s now done openly. Something that would have been a huge taboo even up to the 90s.And the ACC’s entire purpose of existence is to brainwash people (“PR”) to maximize profit (aka the money taken from us, that nothing is exchanged for… as opposed to actually earned money). It’s de-facto a still legalized criminal organization.They will have literally employees whose job it is to edit this article every once in a while, to make them look better, while keeping criticisms in for the sole purpose of making them look bad. (Look at how bad the criticisms section portrays anyone who doesn’t Hail Corporate. Like it’s only “some” and they only “believe” it, and it’s totally not a fact that everybody but them knows.) — 2A0A:A546:970A:1:55D9:8F9B:2059:427C (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Also, psychologically, as well as physically, there is no such thing as a “neutral” POV. It’s literally neurologically impossible, due t how brains work. It’s just what readers say, when they want the communicated information to conform to their own views, and writers say, when they want their manipulating others into their beliefs to go down easier. — 2A0A:A546:970A:1:55D9:8F9B:2059:427C (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I know it's literally on their website, but I was wondering if it made sense for that information to be here directly, much like movie actors list of performances are on their pages even though other movie specific sites provide it. 122.219.71.210 (talk) 18:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it make sense to reproduce their list of members here?