Talk:Lachit Borphukan

message: :::abidwasim has moved this article from "Lachit Borphukan"to "Lachit Borphukan, The Great Commander", as to enlist his name in the wiki article "List_of_people_known_as_The_Great"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abidwasim (talk • contribs) 07:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: MOVED

message: Please go through the re-edited article. I have moved a great portion to Battle of Saraighat.
Prabhakar 09:36, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That is wonderful.  Thanks. Chaipau 14:16, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about now? 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: If anyone's watching this article, I suggest that they go through the text with a little care and remove some of the peacocking. I'd prefer not to do it myself... Relata refero (talk) 12:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: I request the editors not to delete this section as it will add more flavour to this article and will show how brave Lachit was, this will also show the particulers about that battle. I will request contributers to add few more contents from the refrence which i had given if they agree on my point. I some one have any arguments or objections i am ready for discussion. Regards--Sandeep (talk) 11:58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Sariaghat 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lachit Borphukan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310224244/http://www.assam.org/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=90409&page_id=178 to http://www.assam.org/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=90409&page_id=178
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lachit Borphukan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050317024828/http://news.indiainfo.com/2003/01/19/19togadia.html to http://news.indiainfo.com/2003/01/19/19togadia.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lachit Borphukan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305002155/http://www.newslivetv.org/index.php/news/special/526-lachit-divas-observed-across-assam to http://www.newslivetv.org/index.php/news/special/526-lachit-divas-observed-across-assam
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303215718/http://www.sentinelassam.com/ghy_city/story.php?sec=1&subsec=0&id=140647&dtP=2013-01-11&ppr=1 to http://www.sentinelassam.com/ghy_city/story.php?sec=1&subsec=0&id=140647&dtP=2013-01-11&ppr=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413144150/http://www.greatinindia.com/node/690 to http://www.greatinindia.com/node/690
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: LACHIT BORPHUKAN BELONGS TO LAN FIMA FAMILY OF AHOM TRIBE NOT FROM CHUTIA TRIBE. AS REFERENCE ANCIENT SCRIPT WRITTEN IN AHOM LANGUAGE. Chow Mridu Pawan (talk) 15:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — LeoFrank  Talk 15:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2018 

message: LACHIT BORPHUKAN BELONGS TO LAN FIMA FAMILY OF AHOM TRIBE NOT FROM CHUTIA TRIBE. AS REFERENCE ANCIENT SCRIPT WRITTEN IN AHOM LANGUAGE.http://as.vikaspedia.in/education/9859b89ae9f0-9ac9c19f099e9cd99c9c0/9ae9ae9ae9aendia Development Gateway (InDG),InDG is a Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India initiative and is executed by Centre for Development of Advanced Computing Chow Mridu Pawan (talk) 10:09, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Izno (talk) 14:25, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2018 

message: I don't understand what problem editor Chaipau has with me. I corrected a simple thing. Even here he had to put his nose. Isn't it a Wikipedia thing that an editor can correct certain things, I would like to know what wrong did I do here? 
Since the word Lachit was used twice, I corrected it and wrote he instead. 11Anonymous1122 (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously I can't comment on what  had in mind when he made the edit you referred to, but there are a few things that I can say which may possibly be helpful to you.
# It is indeed what you call "a Wikipedia thing" that an editor can make changes which they regard as corrections or improvements. Evidently you did that, and evidently Chaipau did so too. You changed what another editor had written because you thought your version was better, and Chaipau changed what you had written because he thought the other version was better. You can't have it both ways: either editors are allowed to make changes which they think are improvements or they aren't. There isn't some principle which says that you can change things that you think can be improved, but once you have done so nobody else can do the same thing. If you are not willing to accept that anything you write may be removed or changed by others then editing Wikipedia is not for you.
# "Lachit Borphukan was the son of Mosai Sengkaluk who died when he was little" can be read either as "Lachit Borphukan was the son of Mosai Sengkaluk who died when Lachit Borphukan was little" or as "Lachit Borphukan was the son of Mosai Sengkaluk who died when Mosai Sengkaluk was little". If one thinks about it for a couple of seconds it is obvious that the second reading makes no sense, so the first one must apply, but it can be distracting to have to stop and think to work out what a sentence means, even if it takes only half a second to do so. I therefore prefer the original version.
# You say that you "corrected" the wording, and that "using terms like dubious edit rather than grammatical errors is not acceptable". Neither edit was a correction of a grammatical error: both versions are perfectly grammatically correct, and preference for one or the other is a matter of style, not grammar. Also, it seems to me reasonable to have doubts as to whether the edit you made was helpful or not, and that is what "dubious" means, so I don't see any reason to object to that word.
# When an editor does something you don't like, it is a good idea to avoid using expressions such as "he had to put his nose". Using language such as that is likely at best to be seen as uncivil, and at worst to be seen as indicating that you are taking a combative attitude to other editors, rather than a friendly and cooperative one. If you are perceived in that way by other editors, then they are much less likely to view what you say in a sympathetic way, so you are less likely to get support for your views. Worse still, if you continue to be seen in that way you may sooner or later be blocked from editing, which presumably you don't want. For those reasons it is likely to be in your own interest to express yourself in friendly and courteous ways, even if you don't think another editor deserves it. Of course, all that is additional to the fact that I hope you will prefer to be friendly and courteous to other people because you wish to do so, rather than merely because you may gain by doing so. JBW (talk) 21:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Editor 

message: Male 42.105.178.28 (talk) 01:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lachit borphukan 

message: Sculpting the Middle Class: History, Masculinity and the Amar Chitra Katha TrangaBellam (talk) 10:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACK 

message: User:TrangaBellam/Sarkar on Saraighat. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Made no sense to me.  But thanks. Chaipau (talk) 18:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarkar 

message: Hey @TrangaBellam, @Kautilya3, @Fylindfotberserk, I hope you have this page on your watchlist, because there looks like some effort to push POV material here. Chaipau (talk) 20:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindu Lachit 

message: My Self Universe Mr .... SENAPATI u know me 223.238.123.156 (talk) 14:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Prabin SENAPATI is Lachit Borphukan