lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1st Theater Sustainment Command

message: I have found several sources that maybe considered reliable that give this unit the nickname "Leaning shit house". 1 2 3. Before adding this in the infobox, I would like to get a consensus as to how active editors feel about this. If there is opposition to this, I won't do it. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 13:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Leaning shit house

message: An entire section headed "History of 1st Theater Sustainment Command" had been lifted verbatim from this site.  In the absence of any explanation this must be considered a copyright violation.  I removed it.  Someone went to a fair amount of trouble to wikify those paragraphs and they can certainly be restored, when and if the copyright status of that text can be identified.  --Lockley (talk) 05:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The website is a .mil, which means everything on it is PD. Technically it's fine to use as is, though that doesn't mean it shouldn't be attributed (or better yet paraphrased and cited inline). Parsecboy (talk) 08:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I had tagged it previously due to the reasons stated in the multiple issue reference, plus it was basically copy/pasted; however, I don't know if it should have been completely removed, just improved. If I remember correctly, isn't there a template to state that a certain section is taking from a government source, and is from public domain? --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 13:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There are quite a few of them, you can find them here. Parsecboy (talk) 14:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Would there be consensus to re-add the removed material, with a reference link to the page that it was taken from, and the template Template:US Army? --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed section about unit history
Talk:Granbury, Texas

message: I believe that Granbury and Sinan in South Korea have recently entered into a sister city relationship. Can anyone verify whether or not this sisterhood is official or not?
yes that is correct. Korea has become increasingly interested in the nuclear capabilities in this shit hole town. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.254.123.143 (talk) 02:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister Cities 

message: There is an actual page for Hiram B Granbury at this location: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiram_B._Granbury. This article (Granbury, TX) states that his name was actually spelled Granberry. Can we confirm which needs to be changed? Joplju (talk) 06:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Granbury Spelling and Link to Hiram B. Granbury 

message: Nice move, Webb. Nice move.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.224.170 (talk) 05:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local attorney cleverly uses Wikipedia to attract visitors to his website 
Talk:List of surfers

message: Instead of listing these people alphabetically, perhaps their ages would be more informative. Maradja 04:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Due to the amount of surfers in the world and the risk for non-notable surfers being included in this list, I think we should limit entry in this list to those who:
* have a wikipedia page
* have references in a wikipedia page (as stated on this page)
This will eliminate the level of spam we receive here. Lympathy  Talk 14:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eligibility 

message: :Houscleaned... every entry now has either a ref or a WP article with that name.  However:
: - I did not check any refs I did not add
: - I did not check to see if the linked article is a surfer, except in a couple of cases
:An interested editor might undertake to do a bit of that. Or not.User talk:Unfriend12 01:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Housecleaning 

message: I noticed a couple of egregious problems -- one totally spurious entry that had persisted for five months -- and did a few other minor edits. This could use a more thorough review by someone more knowledgeable about surfing than I am; someone who could make judgments in borderline cases which I cannot.  Mason Peters should probably be removed, perhaps others as well.
Jreiss17 (talk) 04:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Housecleaning
Talk:Mt. Lebanon School District

message: I know that some of the dates in the aforementioned section are incorrect.  I don't have any hard evidence to prove it, however, as a member of the team during the time span I know them to be false.  Moore1612 01:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forensic section 

message: While I'm glad this page makes importance of the school's fine arts, something that is actually rather neglected to be recognized within the school, perhaps there should be a mention of athletics as well, since MTLHS is known for that as well.
I know that Girl's Lacrosse just won WPIAL, as well as Boy's Basketball, Boy's Swimming, Hockey, etc. and a lot of the teams are in AAA or AAAA leagues. (I don't remember them all, since I am more into fine arts.) I know that Fine Arts is something that school is recognized for, but it's not lacking in athletics either.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyuu (talk • contribs) 
::Good idea.  Please cite to the appropriate pages at either  www.wpial.org or the Post-Gazette.--M@rēino 04:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athletics as well? 

message: Is the information on vulgar student lists really relevant?  I belive it fails Wikipedia:Recentism, and I plan on removing it at the end of the week if no-one can demonstrate otherwise.--M@rēino 02:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that its a flash in the pan type incident which is not likely to be remembered for very long. I added the sources because it was indeed a true statement and not libellous like the reversion indicated. I propose that we leave it up until June 16th, the last day of class for the students. Then it can be taken down as many of the students involved will graduate and the article will no longer be relavant. (As an aside, I personally feel that it the media made a mountain out of a molehill by putting it on the front page of the PG and that's the only reason that it's relavant enough to leave it up that long.) ClarkBHM 13:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.--M@rēino 13:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vulgarity 
Talk:The Star, Sydney

message: Photo of casino provided, but somebody might look to get their mitts on a night shot as well. -- saberwyn 09:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General

message: Does Star City have actual "video poker machines", or just video verions of "poker machines" (i.e. slot machines)?  The last time I was there, they had no actual Video Poker machines, and a Video Poker forum mentions that there were none as of 2009. -- That Don Guy (talk) 22:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Poker?
Talk:Granby Prédateurs

message: Fair use rationale completed. Flibirigit (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Granbypredateurs.gif

message: This article has the wrong Granby Predateurs logo, you are using the logo from the Quebec Semi-Pro Hockey League, not the one used from the QMJHL.
The logo you should have here looks like this:
http://38.108.70.85/lang_en/index.php?page=8392&id_equipe=8¤tseason=77  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moose4975 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo in the article
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Constantine Conspiracy/Archive

message: Has the term ‘Constantine Conspiracy’ been used by others to refer to these actions by Emperor Constantine?  If not, what did they refer to it as?
What objection would you have to putting the material about the “authority” of the Gospel of Matthew (original) under the article Gospel of the Hebrews, if it is not already there?
It  seems to me that an article on conspiracy should focus on the conspiracy.  I think that that would make a much better article.  Bejnar 17:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constantine Conspiracy
Talk:Slapping (strike)

message: Does this article seem short to you? 05:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a picture or two showing a slap would be good.--172.164.78.170 21:17, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: A slap in the face was / is considered to be extremely humiliating not only in India but also in Europe (e.g. the former German Chancellor Kiesinger was slapped in public by Holocaust-survivor Beate Klarsfeld).
It was also a ritual to emphasize the importance of treaties, to "help" people remember, to show the relation between master and apprentice (one slap to start the apprenticeship, another when the apprentice became a journeyman), as a blessing etc. 2003:DF:3BC6:9600:546D:B28F:873A:3C41 (talk) 11:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural Aspects
Talk:'Til the Medicine Takes

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 22:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Symphony No. 6 (Prokofiev)

message: The final sentence says, "Some writers say this symphony has a tragic ending, but others consider the finale to be similar in mood to the classical symphony of Prokofiev.[1] and say that the final movement has an optimistic joviality reminiscent of the symphonies of Joseph Haydn." This is unsourced and, to my ears, is almost surreal. I will delete it if nobody objects. Opus131 (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: Earlier today, I took it upon myself to rewrite this article. A lot of unsourced statements, personal opinions, and unencyclopedic material needed to be removed. At the same time, very little was meaningfully discussed about the symphony's genesis, structure (which can still be expanded upon, but time did not permit me to do that myself at this moment), and critical reception. Hopefully this will be accepted as an improvement upon the old article. Still a few things to do, which I hope to tweak and expand upon in the next few days. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I like your improvements, though I have restored some of the non-controversial things you removed (instrumentation, recording, authority control, Sergei Prokofiev navbox). Thanks, intforce (talk) 03:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewrite
Talk:Rose Jackson

message: The article was subsequently recreated with different content.Blnguyen | rant-line 00:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Current NUS president.
Sources: , , . 
-- CHANLORD [T]/[C]  16:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I feel sorry for you 0001.Esmehwp 13:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just searched her name after watching her on TV for the dozenth time, and got to this deletion page! it is stupid for  people who are not knowledgable of something to show their ignorance by deleting information. she is THE icon of young labour, Whenever the Australian media is covering politics of the youth or the left she is the person they show also she has been in numerous debates on tv, just tonight she was on the ABC's "difference of opinion" an hour long primetime prestigous debate show with 4 panelists she being one. ABC might not mean anything to nerds in USA but it is similar in stature to BBC and if you don't know what I mean by that then god help WP, she is destined to be one of australia's leaders in the near future (not that I'm particularly happy about that!) and possibly a future PM (thats prime minister) but this just shows how closed minded and ignorant and arrogant you are take a look at yourselves in the mirror, you need to realise your knowledge is very limited, don't delete things you don't know anything about. there should be a full article on her as she is (for better or worse) shaping the entire debate around the future of australian politics.  just because something is not mentioned a billion times by geeks on the internet doesn't mean it is not important. seriously think about how arrogant you have just been and don't repeat it in the future, you'll rarely get someone who both understands the significance of some topic that you are ignorant of AND knows how wikipedia works and can stop you from making your mistakes so err (by far) on the side of inclusion as your understanding like everyone else's is limited and your access to information is also limited to what people like yourself choose to make available online.Esmehwp 13:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 0001

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 20:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Rose Jackson titles a page with content and so it must also be dispositioned. If this request is granted, then Rose Jackson may be deleted or moved to Rose Jackson (disambiguation) and tagged with  in accordance with WP:ONEOTHER. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 23:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 April 2021
Talk:Moondogs (professional wrestling)

message: AfD result was not merge and redirect, it was delete. One Night In Hackney303 12:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lanny Kean removed

message: What is the origin of the name "Moondogs"?  Are they named after the musician? If so, why?  Mr JM  03:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? Anyone?  Mr JM  03:01, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Moondog" 

message: Why no mention whatsoever of Moondog Mayne and his role in creating most of the main tropes of the Moondog gimmick? (long blond hair, beard, denim, general feral behaviour) 62.190.148.115 (talk) 17:47, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lonnie Mayne]]
Talk:Channel 101 NY

message: I did some fixins'. Any thoughts? Yanksox 05:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What makes either of the 'notable personalities' notable? --InShaneee 17:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: When I look this over I think Gemberling should be the only one up there since he is the only one whom has really done anything mainstream and is on the verge of big time mainstream. Feel free to remove, if you feel the need. Yanksox 17:36, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, I'm almost wondering if this should be merged into Channel 101 until it gains notability on its own right. --InShaneee 18:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: However, it doesn't have the noteability (star power, ect) that the other one does yet. Plus, the first couple sections of this page are duplicating content of the Channel 101 page. --InShaneee 18:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Sounds perfect. I'm still not even sure if this is a good solution (just kind of thinking outloud), so more input would be nice. Perhaps mention the idea on the Channel 101 talk page? --InShaneee 23:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mazdaznan

message: This entry is a mess.  Please, somebody rewrite it in English.
:I did my best, but it needs more help than just a translation. – Morganfitzp 19:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

message: was mazdaznan also in russian empire? who knows anything about anna mamreova??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.202.96.225 (talk) 13:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia 

message: I doubt that the first Mazdaznan center was in Chicago 1890. The earliest reference I found was Salt Lake City 1898. On February 23 1900, there is an article in the New York Sun that Hanish plans to establish a temple in Chicago. Also in the Deseret Evening News, March 7 1900.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patumbah (talk • contribs) 10:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning
Talk:Blind contour drawing

message: I have expanded and changed some of the details of this page (this is my fist edit).  My only real objection was to the idea that blind contour could be a finished art.  While it is true that some artists might use it as a method, I have yet to encounter any that uses this exercise as a way to create finished art.  This is an exercise about process and not about product.  I am going to try to change the photo as well as I do not believe that this drawing is truly representative of the process.  I would bet serious cash that this drawing was not true to the process.  I have never a blind contour that looks so intact before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fallstaf (talk • contribs) 
:I just ran into an artist that uses this technique to draw the lines in finished art, and then colors them in. -- Beland (talk) 17:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Discussion 

message: This article could be expanded with the following sections: Precursors, History, Philosophical Reasoning, Artists/Schools Influenced by the Technique, Similar Techniques/Schools, Criticism, Categories
–Skreyola (talk) 19:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion Guidance 

message: The article makes two claims:
* "The left mode of the brain rejects meticulous, complex perception of spatial and relational information, consequently permitting the right brain to take over."
* "Blind contour drawing trains the eye and hand to work as a team, and it helps students to see all of the details of the object."
Is there any scientific evidence for or against these theories, or are they just conjecture? -- Beland (talk) 17:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence for claims
Talk:9th SS Panzer Division Hohenstaufen

message: The name 9. Waffen SS Panzerdivision "Hohenstaufen" differs from its entry here in that it has "Waffen" in its title, which usually only signifies a specific infantry group such as mountain, grenadier, or cavalry groups. Should the name read exactly as the title of the page? 9th SS Panzer Division "Hohenstaufen". -PatPeter 08:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked the name is the same are you sure you were not looking at 19th Waffen in error ? --Jim Sweeney (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on name 

message: If I may add a note about Waffen SS units nomenclature, see how the 'Waffen XXX Division of the SS' added to the unit's name and number is designing a unit that is not Volksdeutsche (not german, in short a unit from foreign volunteers) where XXX is a specific specialty as said. In fact, right from the list mentioned you will see that, starting with 19th Div we have:
- 19th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (2nd Latvian)
- 20th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Estonian)
- 21st Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Skanderberg (1st Albanian)
- 23rd Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Kama (2nd Croatian)
- 24th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS (Karstjäger)
- 25th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS Hunyadi (1st Hungarian)
- etc etc...
There are, of course exceptions like the 5th SS-PzDiv 'Wiking' that, being raised maily from volunteers fron northern countries, was equiparated to a 'full german' division, or the 23rd SS Volunteer Panzergrenadier Division Nederland (1st Dutch)...
79.2.133.105 (talk) 10:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brief note on the nomenclature of SS units 

message: This section is unsourced and goes into details of the military operations and speculations on commander's intentions. Per WP:MILMOS, I plan to remove the unsourced material, unless there's someone willing to provide WP:RS citations. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it appears that there are no objections I will go ahead. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arnhem
Talk:10th SS Panzer Division Frundsberg

message: Frundsberg div was mostly outside the halbe pocket. I believe it's recon battalion was in halbe, but the mass of the div was in the spremberg pocket with the Fuhrer begleit div & 344 inf div. They broke out westwards, suffering big losses, but elements did regain Germain lines in north Czech, Dresden area.
https://www.feldgrau.com/ww2-german-10th-ss-panzer-division-frundsburg/ 82.68.17.100 (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halbe
Talk:25th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS Hunyadi (1st Hungarian)

message: Obviously two articles exist for one and the same thing. --FJS15 (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal

message: Preserving here by providing this link; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Rationale is opposed. The material is of interest/sourced. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 00:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit
Talk:Walloon Legion

message: Georges Jacobs link was faulty, incorrect person. Link disassociated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.48.221 (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suggest this page is moved to the title "Légion Wallonie" (or its English equivalent) which is certainly the common name and seen frequently in academic sources. As a bonus, it also can refer to all incarnations of the unit, not just its brief and insignificant spell as a "Volunteer Grenadier Division" on paper.—Brigade Piron (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: In re this edit: ,  Marc Rikmenspoel is a Waffen-SS apologist; he's included in this section: Waffen-SS_in_popular_culture#Popular_history. Eddy de Bruyne is an author of unknown credentials; the only thing I see about him is that he had contacts with the Walloon legion troopers  & collects wartime photos of Leon Degrelle & the legion's personnel: . -- K.e.coffman (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never come across Rickmenspoel before, but I believe that de Bruyne is a relatively well-regarded popular writer on the subject albeit not an academic historian. His work on the Walloon Legion is described as "thorough" by Cegesoma (1) and his 1997 work on Rexist exiles in 1944/1945 was reviewed quite favourably in the Journal of Belgian History (2). I'm not sure whether either of the two points you note about him is strictly relevant. 21:28, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddy de Bruyne & Marc Rikmenspoel
Talk:29th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS RONA (1st Russian)

message: Is where it says "estimates of victims vary from 700 to 15,000" a mistake? I've never read any article that puts the victims of Kaminski's excesses as low as 700. Perhaps it is meant to be 7,000?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.167.174.97 (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: --Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't its official name.Galassi (talk) 14:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't be the [[Russian National Liberation Army]] (or 29th Waffen-SS Divsion)? 

message: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5:RONApatch.png --Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RONA pacth pic from the Ru wiki 

message: Tag seems to be erroneously applied – none of the MoS General principles  are violated.
Until issues with MoS will be clarified tag is irrelevant. Thanks   Jo0doe (talk) 16:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:MOS]]

message: It seems that the article is largely a duplicate of S.S. Sturmbrigade R.O.N.A. and that the unit itself was never formed. I propose that the article be redirected to the "Sturmbrigade" article. Please let me know of any feedback. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there have been no objections, I redirected the article. Preserving here by providing this link. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect proposal