Talk:Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement

message: I think the number of external links to the various bodies of the Movement should be trimmed to just one or two. See the policy WP:EL. Colin MacLaurin 13:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I have attended a Reform church for about 15 years and this paragraph is untrue:
"Both these splinter groups have doctrines which include women being prohibited from cutting their hair, wearing trousers and wearing short sleeves. Other doctrines include prohibitions on eating chocolate, cheese and in the Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement is was even considered whether to make eating beans and rice together at the same meal against church doctrine, and therefore an offence punishable by disfellowshipment."
Members (I'm sure there might always be exceptions) do cut their hair, wear trousers and wear short sleeves.  Not eating chocolate or cheese is NOT a DOCTRINE (and many do), and I have never HEARD of any "beans and rice" discussion, and it is certainly not a matter for disfellowshipment.  I can't imagine who wrote this.  Heisable (talk) 03:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors 

message: Can anyone improve the section about the 1951 split?  There's very little information given, and the sentence "The cause of this split was personal pride, and a lust for power." is not NPOV. Tony Zbaraschuk 01:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1951 split? 

message: I have written up a document on the history on the Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement, if no one minds I would like to rewrite the Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement.....Simbagraphix (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting and updating 

message: 2005 Apology 
Regarding this sentence: "In 2005, the mainstream Seventh-day Adventist church tried to make amends and apologized for its failures during World War II, as the issue from the actions of L. R. Conradi continued during that war."  
The referenced article "Church Leaders say "We're Sorry'" addresses the anti-semitic and pro-Nazi attitudes and actions of the German and Austrian SDA Church during World War II.  There is no record of an apology by the SDA Church over its failures during World War I regarding the issues in question that led to the formation of the SDARM. If there are no objections I will delete the sentence. Engellion (talk) 23:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconcialiation Efforts 

message: I dont see any outstanding issues, I think the neutrality of this article is no longer disputed.  But will leave the tag till there has been time for full discussion on the issue.Simbagraphix (talk) 23:53, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion is dormant. I will remove the tag. William Avery (talk) 11:28, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality of this article is disputed

message: "formed as the result of a schism within the Seventh-day Adventist Church in Europe during World War I over the position its leadership incorrectly took on proper Sabbath observance and in committing Seventh-day Adventist Church members to the bearing of arms in military service"
We ought to find a reliable source for the statement that includes the word "incorrectly" (I am aware this word is again used in the article's body), or else remove the word from the statement. The word isn't really needed to convey the intended meaning anyway.
We also need to rethink the use of the word "proper" in the same quotes. Again, why is this word needed there?
My name is Mercy11 (talk) 15:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag

message: What if we work on services to needy peoples 196.189.182.72 (talk) 19:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humanitarian services