Talk:List of Arrested Development characters

message: * Would you all please sign beside the comments you make!
--WongFeiHung 22:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Should we include Steve Holt now that we know that he's GOB's son?
*I don't see why not.
*I added one. Rubber cat 06:48, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Steve Holt!

message: Gob is also known to be the biggest womanizer in the Bluth family and is frequently saught after by George Michael when he needs something his father will not give him such as marijuana for Lucille Austero - It was Buster who tried to get George Micheal to buy marijuana for Lucille 2, not GOB. --213.237.232.155 09:26, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, but George Michael went to him for Buster, which is what "saught(sic) after by George Michael" means. If it said "GOB sought George Michael for medical marijuana," it would be incorrect.
Dudewhiterussian 21:20, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction

message: There are still three articles that need fully merging into this one - Carl Weathers (character), Maggie Lizer, and Oscar Bluth. I've also put delete tags on :Category:Arrested Development characters and , as these will be obsolete post-merge. sjorford mmmmm 11:47, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged Maggie Lizer and Oscar Bluth a while ago, and it seems like Carl Weathers made it in as well. --Christopherlin 09:29, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: *In the entry on Steve Holt, I put the line "basically a young G.O.B.". However, the line is actually ""basically a young you" (Michael was talking to G.O.B.) so it should be "basically a young [G.O.B.]". I can't for the life of me figure out how to put brackets on "G.O.B." if "G.O.B." is wikified. Help? Rubber cat 07:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it with: [Gob]. Tntnnbltn 14:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing help 

message: *Someone needs to change all references to the eldest Bluth son so that his name is spelt the same for every mention. Not "GOB" then "G.O.B." then "Gob". Consistency!
** Done, although I may have missed one or two. -- MisterHand 06:44, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone will have to go through and change all the instances to Gob again. In numerous articles its written as G.O.B. and even in this article its spelled Gob and then GOB in the same sentence! I wasn't going to start changing it until I found some indication that anyone ever made such a decision on which is the best way to do it. Unless someone has a protest, I'm going to switch everything to Gob since that's how it seems to be spelled on the show. — JediRogue (talk) 19:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I just double-checked the pilot where his name is spelled "G.O.B.". I don't think its spelled that way anywhere else on the show. Its kind of a big contradiction in all the articles where its referenced. — JediRogue (talk) 20:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Oscar Bluth II

message: I have added back Gene Parmesan, the family private investigator that has been involved in several episodes, and it's been deleted.  Then I noticed that someone is now counting the number of times that someone has appeared in different episodes.  This is a slippery slope, in that it requires everyone editing to be familiar with the entire canon of shows, since every show has the possibility of affecting every recurring character's position order and episode count.  Gene's been in a least two shows and mentioned in a third when Michael calls him to have a third party checked out, and yet because I know the shows better than somene else editing, they removed the reference.  A minor annoyance.
almbergnospamfamily@aol.com
What episodes other than "Amigos" has he been in? Rubber cat 07:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gene Parmesan

message: I really appreciate whoever added the pictures for most of the characters but there are still several characters who need pictures on this page.  Is anyone up for the challenge?
The picture of Buster is about the most hilarious picture on Wikipedia. --74.109.126.35 05:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: I have watched over and over the episodes involving Annyong Bluth. My parents, both born and raised in Korea for over 25 years, have confirmed for me my suspicions unequivocally that "Hel-loh" does not mean anything at all in Korean, much less "one day". Furthermore, I saw no indication that he was ever called, referred to, or in anyway identified as "Hel-loh", which does not sound anything like a Korean name, or word for that matter.
Which is why I'm having a hard time explaining the finale. My only guess is possible a strange North Korean dialect, or an extremely distorted word to sound like "hello" to make the joke come full circle.
--It is mearly a joke in the since that people call Annyong "Annyong", as that is what he said first to the Bluths, which is like an American kid being adopted by a Korean family, and he says "Hello" to them, and they keep calling him "Hello" because of it. When it is revield that is name is "Hel-Loh", this is ment to be funny, as it is like if "Hello" were to be named "Ann-Yong". Also, most people do not know Korean in the US, so you can pull off saying that Hel-Loh in Korean means "One Day", much like in Korea where you can say that Ann-Yong in English means "One Day". Savvy?
:Can you break it down a little further for me?  I'm still having trouble following.  Damn these headaches. Wavy G 00:19, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They (the writers) are taking advantage of the fact that not many people that watch the show know enough Korean to know that they're lying. --Raijinili 19:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annyong Bluth 

message: I posit before a jury of my peers, that Tobias Fünke's mustache is false, due to its spontaneous appearance and absence during the Mrs. Featherbottom debacle.  Perhaps he is merely wearing a false one at this point, but it supports his general over-compensating nature (see: that time he walks naked into breakfast).
--Smith 7/6/08  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.193.233 (talk) 07:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Lindsay, who married Tobias to spite her mother, is convinced that her husband is gay." I don't think Lindsay realizes it. --Raijinili 01:29, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't recall that joke from the series. Have any reliable sources referenced it? DonIago (talk) 05:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tobias Fünke 

message: Why doesn't Ice have a mention?Gamer83 04:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ice the Bounty Hunter

message: An issue that is not addressed here (but is to some extent at the Fandom Wiki) is that the ages of George Michael and Maeby are different in season 4 (and thus season 5 also). They are suddenly 18 years old, instead of 16, at the start of season 4, even though the season begins at exactly where season 3 left off. This retroactive continuity is made very clear by George Michael soon leaving for college (and first there being somewhat of a graduation party for him) and the development of the Maeby-staying-in-high-school story. There is still some confusion about how, if season 3 ended in fictional 2006, that we can still end up in fictional 2012 at the end of the season, since it seems that only 4-5 years have passed. Clearly, George Michael only went to college for four years, though some at the Fandom site have tried to stretch his time in college to 5 or 6 years. But it's said that he had a "semester abroad" (not a full school year) his junior year, the spring semester because we were also shown him participating in the kissing study in the fall semester, then came back after that summer. Also, if you follow the Maeby story closely, you'll see that she has a "sophomore senior" year and a "junior senior" year (that is, a second and third senior years after purposely flunking her first senior year), but then she seems to give up on the idea, so there's a year when she's not in high school, only to return again for a "final senior" year; note that the narrator does not use the phrase, "senior senior" year for this third additional senior year because that at that point in the joke the word play falls apart. If she had a fourth additional year, it would not have a name that fits because because the first additional senior year was her "sophomore senior" year. So then why have her take a year off? First of all, it helps her story, because the viewer has to doubt how committed she could have stayed to the notion of staying in high school (even if it gave her something to do). Secondly, it accounts for Maeby's four years. All this is another way of saying, by the way, that the fourth season also seems to have put us in 2008, not 2006. This date still works for the housing crisis. The only thing that stands in the way is the real-estate agent (played by Ed Helms) saying "it's 2006," but we can claim that's a joke on his part, because he can't believe this couple with no money is buying a mansion in 2008. If that takes place in the summer of 2008, right before the general economic crash, but after the housing crisis had begun in August 2007, it would make sense that he would make that joke, as well as the joke about him being selling houses to people who can't afford them.--JKaw  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:FDF0:9ED0:F4A8:63A0:1B40:6813 (talk) 19:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character's Age 

message: Just thought I'd mention this IMdB list of all the characters, and the episodes they were in, which should be of help to future editors.  . Danski14 01:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IMdB Resource

message: OK, I'm only a recent viewer of the show and have only seen so many episodes, but I don't think Michael calls Ann "Ann hog." The only time I've seen Michael use the phrase is to refer to George Michael- because George Michael was spending so much time with her, he was becoming an "Ann hog" as in hogging Ann. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 04:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds right to me. Your version, I mean. --Raijinili 03:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I stand corrected.  Michael later says "Ann hog's coming?" in reference to Ann. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 22:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ann hog 

message: Maeby is adopted, not Lindsey;  could we please change that?
:Uh, no, I'm afraid not. I guess you haven't watched the show far enough. :) Danski14 00:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biiiiiig spoiler

message: I think its time to split the nine main characters off to their own articles.  Their individual entries here are about as big as most fictional character articles I've seen, and well, this page is huge.  Thoughts?  Wavy G 03:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm... That sounds like a pretty good idea. We will have to reformat the top of this page... I guess we can keep the family tree, and maybe interlink it? Or  we could include short summaries, like on the main AD page,  and/or we might even consider renaming this page to "recurring characters". There will also be a number of things we will have to do, such as add the template the bottom of each page, and fix all the links. However, it looks like almost all the links already point to the redirect pages which we will be replacing, so I don't think it will be much work. So  I guess I don't have any major problem with the change. Danski14 04:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Another thing that just came to mind is that we probably would have to reword the articles to make it clear they are fictional characters. There is something to be said for having them all on one page. Danski14 04:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd totally love that... if they can be expanded with an out-of-universe perspective.  That's how writing about fiction is expected to be done now- see the FAs on the fictional characters, Palpatine, Jabba the Hutt, and the GA Lord Voldemort, which was demoted and only re-promoted when publication history was added.  But this shouldn't be that hard.  DVD commentary and TV reviews of the show should help.  I found newspaper articles, for instance, on the casting of George Sr. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 22:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Michael Bluth, freed of his family, at last. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 08:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I emancipated Maeby Fünke as well.  By the way, my computer froze while I was writing it and I had to rewrite it, so I totally expect a barnstar for that. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 19:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellente.  Thanks for the emancipation, to all involved.  Wavy G 08:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Characters 

message: :Image:Ann Veal - AD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ann Veal - AD.jpg

message: :Image:Bob Loblaw.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Bob Loblaw.png

message: :Image:Stan Sitwell - AD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Stan Sitwell - AD.jpg

message: Do we not count the third Marta that briefly appeared in flashback in forget-me-now? -- Jayunderscorezero 23:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marta 3.0

message: In an episode (I don't remember which), it said that Oscar was in the Army in Vietnam. But if he was on a swift boat, wouldn't he have been in the Navy? 12.218.145.112 02:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In the Navy?

message: :Image:Tony Wonder - AD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Tony Wonder - AD.jpg

message: I noticed last night in the episode "The one where they build a house" Starla has three bruises on her arm that look like marks where she has been grabbed.
Is this a real life injury or is it a joke related to her character? I ask because in some shot's they are so blindingly obvious (the scene where G.O.B unviels his business model par examplé). Cheers Fenton Bailey 11:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starla's Bruises 

message: :Image:Trisha Thoon - AD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Trisha Thoon - AD.jpg

message: Why is there no  entry on Little Justice. He is in more than one episode and I think his trait of changing his allegiance often (with White Power Bill as Little Justice, George as David Avram or whatever and Tin Man with Tobias/Dorothy) is noteworthy. 
Jabso (talk) 03:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Justice/David Avram??/Tin Man entry 

message: :Image:Oscarbluthcoffeeshop.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Oscarbluthcoffeeshop.JPG

message: :Image:Lucielle2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lucielle2.JPG

message: The family tree says that Buster's father is Oscar.  And even though this was a recurring theme through the second season, I thought I remember them revealing that George was undoubtedly the boy's father.  Am I wrong in this
Giovanni539  —Preceding comment was added at 19:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the original plan was to have George revealed as his real father. In the commentary in the 2nd season (when they did commentary the show hadn't been cancelled)when Buster was saying "my uncle is my father, my father is my uncle?" or something like that Hurwitz said "Imagine the confusion when we reveal that his father is his real father" referring to George. But the 3rd season was cut short and they had to rush a few things which meant that plan was scrapped. The last thing that happened in regards to that storyline was Buster assuming Oscar is his real father, nothing further was mentioned by the narrator so I think this is what we should assume also. Jabso (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The second to last time the issue is mentioned explicitly is in Prison Break-In, when the narrator twice refers to Oscar as Buster's "true father." The final time is in Development Arrested, when Oscar is referred to as Buster's "loving father." I think this pretty much closes the issue 138.88.156.182 (talk) 20:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Buster's Parentage

message: I think the Ian Robert's literal doctor character should be included.  He appears in a few episodes.24.80.30.65 (talk)Tristan  —Preceding comment was added at 06:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Literal Doctor

message: Do you think the two wardens should be included in this page? If so, can someone add them? From IMDB:
James Lipton	 ... 	Warden Stefan Gentles (4 episodes, 2004-2005)
Rocky McMurray	 ... 	Warden James Buck (2 episodes, 2003)
--Vchao (talk) 06:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Include Warden Gentles and Warden Buck?

message: :Image:FranklinAD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:FranklinAD.jpg

message: Does it say anywhere in the show what denomination Ann's family is?  It seems fairly likely that they are Lutheran or Anglican(the former probably being more likely, but this is conjecture) because George Michael has made references to her going to mass in "Meet the Veals" but in the same episode it is established that her father is a pastor, not a priest.  I looked it up and it looks like Lutherans and Anglicans are the only protestant denominations in the U.S. that refer to their services as masses.  152.23.202.133 (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denomination 

message: Since when is a car considered a "character"? I think we should move it, but i don't know where to.  Anyone? --Duke33 (talk) 16:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staircar??? 

message: Just to add that the apperance of Larry is a reference of an episode of The Super Dave Osbourne Show, where he mocked James Bond in a outfit (starting at 1:13) similar to the "Surrogate" outfit on Arrested Development. --ShadowSlave 00:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larry Mittleman 

message: I would love to see an explanation of the following sentence: He is referring to her parents being his "cousins" in the British sense, but the line also implies Rita's parents were each other's cousins in the American sense.
As a Brit with a fair bit of time clocked up Stateside, and a good appreciation of American culture, I would expect to understand this, but I don't. As far as I'm aware, the default understanding of "cousin" is the same on both sides of the Atlantic; i.e. one of Rita's maternal grandparents would be a sibling of one of her paternal grandparents.
I'm intending to remove this sentence from the article as I don't feel it adds anything meaningful, and I suspect it is the result of misinformation/misunderstanding; at any rate it is unsourced and presumably speculative.TheSnowApe (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rita Leeds 

message: I noticed that there are a few notable characters missing from the List of Arrested Development characters.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flameow (talk • contribs) 06:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More characters 

message: I added the clarify me template to the Maeby section as it doesn't make much sense. How does Linday delivering her rule out her being a 'test-tube baby' (i.e. conceived via IVF)? Either the series implied Lindsay was born of a surrogate mother or Lindsay delivered her via a C-section (which would be unrelated to her being conceived via IVF) in which two cases her having a natural birth would be relevant. Or alternatively the series implied she was conceived via IVF but showed her being conceived naturally near the end Nil Einne (talk) 09:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maeby - clarify me 

message: It is clearly stated in "Out on a Limb" that Oscar is Buster's father when Oscar and Lucille are having argument. Oscar first says "He is MY boy!" Moments later, she clearly says "I don't want you telling him you're his father!" Later when, Buster confronts her, she does not deny it saying "I never wanted you to know!" This seems like a clear enough answer to the question of Buster's father. The Filmaker (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also stated in Prison Break-In by the narrator, who twice refers to Oscar as Buster's "true father." The final time the issue is mentioned explicitly is in Development Arrested, when Oscar is referred to as Buster's "loving father." I think that makes the answer clear. 138.88.156.182 (talk) 20:43, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Buster's father

message: Recent edits have been something of a debacle.  The merged article is now massive- "This page is 99 kilobytes long. It may be appropriate to split this article into smaller, more specific articles."  And the subheadings have been removed.  If you look at good articles of fictional characters- Lisa Simpson, Captain Jack Sparrow, Jabba the Hutt, you'll find a lot of them have seperate sections for fictional biographies and real life info. Ribbet32 (talk) 18:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woah! 

message: I noticed that someone had chosen to name Maeby "Maeby Bluth (nee Fünke)" in the article. Although I agree it should be written in her segment, it is not a good idea to use it as a title for her segment, as their marriage may be legally binding, but the only reference to it is at the beginning of one episode. We shall just have to see if the film comes out. Grieferhate (talk) 18:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I also think it probably wrong to have her name as Maeby Bluth. Her name was not automatically changed, and she certainly would not have changed it herself, as she states her opposition to even recognizing the marriage as real.138.88.90.188 (talk) 04:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Maeby's name

message: I removed the "citation needed" thing from the implied father bit. All the character descriptions come from watching the show, and that includes Buster's implied biological father. No citation is necessary.  Randal6546 (talk) 17:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buster Bluth, minor thing 

message: Seems to me that Uncle Jack should be included on the list of characters.  A whole episode was dedicated to him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.111.82 (talk) 03:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncle Jack 

message: Didn't the mexican maid find his papers that proved Annyong is 18 at the end of one episode? I guess they dropped that story arc? Simanos (talk) 13:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annyong is 18 

message: I noticed that there is no section for Nellie the prostitute. She's in Family Ties.  Bassoon Man The Freak (talk) 01:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nellie 

message: She has a passing resemblance ( http://i.imgur.com/62AmVrn.jpg ) to the actress who played her in Seasons 1 to 3, but why didn't the original actress play her again? I thought everyone was coming back.
:Portia de Rossi plays Lindsay in all 4 seasons. But your right she don't look like she did previously, she only resembles.94.145.237.149 (talk) 07:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Who played Lindsay in Season 4

message: *I opened that page while still watching season one. I was really disappointed of the spoilers on here. Maybe you could add a spoiler alert on top?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.47.127.39 (talk) 17:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: SpoilerAlert

message: What is the problem with the third level of the family tree? I looked at the code/mark-up and can't see any obvious problems. I'm looking at it with Chrome and it is completely unreadable. Liz Read! Talk! 19:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family tree 

message: I feel that they have been on the show often enough to appear on this page. 77.167.231.99 (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andy Richter and brothers