Talk:Fortitude Valley, Queensland

message: This seems dubious, at best.  While some people are moving to the valley, many are moving out to allow for developments of offices and retail areas.  Compare with suburbs like Forest Lake, which didn't exist a decade ago and now hold thousands upon thousands of residents, and I think that the Valley is far from the fastest growing. - Kirkbroadhurst, 20:05, 23-6-05 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirkbroadhurst (talk • contribs) 10:06, 23 June 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the Valley didn't have that many (non-transient) residents not so long ago.  The thing is, it's now filled with high-density housing blocks,  which means that there might have been quite a substantial population increase.  But I don't know.  I suppose there'd be a source somewhere. Slac speak up! 01:06, 24 June 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In some ways, yes.  But on the other hand, for example, the entire James St precinct is now just stores, bars, markets etc.  I personally know quite a few people who lived in houses around that area and moved due to demolition. Kirkbroadhurst 10:50, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I just edited the page, and admittedly I still need to reference it, but I removed this claim - show me the stats, and prove me wrong!  Try looking at the results from the last two censuses to see if you can support the claim. Sambo 12:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: It would be if the Chinese have had a significant history and role in the city, just like the Chinese do in San Francisco.  However, I'm sure that the anti-PC right-wingers on Wikipedia won’t find it pleasing though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.191.23.9 (talk) 21:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

text: "Whether the Chinese HAD a history in the Valley doesn't seem the point."   On the contrary.  When you say "doesn't seem the point", I'm not looking for appearances.  When I mean history, someone effaced any mention of Chinatown in the paragraph and just limited it to one sentence. Someone just didn't want to put emphasis on the Chinese community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.222.95 (talk) 21:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: with its becoming the most rapidly growing suburb in Brisbane

message: The article makes the claim that the Valley was the largest non-CBD shopping precinct in Australia between the 1950s and 1960s.
This is unsubstantiated POV at best.  
The Chapel Street, Commercial & High Street precinct around Prahran, Victoria and South Yarra, Victoria (1880-1950) with its several emporiums spanning around several city blocks would have easily dwarfed the Valley, as would Smith Street in Collingwood, Victoria and Chadstone Shopping Centre in 1962. Having lived in Brisbane I fail to see how the Valley could assume this title at any stage in its history with larger suburban centres operating in both Sydney and Melbourne. --Biatch 09:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found a source to support the claim.  The first author has written extensively about local history. - Shiftchange (talk) 04:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  largest non-CBD shopping precinct in Australia ????

message: Is the current picture at the top of this article's infobox really the best choice for this article? It shows a view down a minor Valley street, of a minor Valley landmark. Is this really representative of the focus of the area? Wouldn't a picture of Brunswick Street Mall, the image most commonly associated with the Valley, be more appropriate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.76.150.120 (talk) 15:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This article seems to have been edited by interest groups to put emphasis on both the church and the gay community. I don't think the picture is indicative of the area, and I don't think mention of the gay population in the introduction is appropriate. It would work in a demographic subsection, but certainly not in the introduction. 121.45.252.239 (talk) 07:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Picture

message: Fortitude is spelled wrong in the caption. The R is missing. Amandaellis (talk) 10:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Misspelling

message: I've removed the emphasis to the gay scene in the opening paragraph. By placing it there it implies that the Valley is entirely given over to gay establishments, which is not the case. It occupies an important niche, to be sure, but it's far from the majority. Put it in a sub-heading instead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.77.144.204 (talk) 12:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What's with the gay emphasis in the opening paragraph?

message: Is the current photo from James St really representative of the Valley? It's not even a good representation of James St. Perhaps a photo of Chinatown or of the old heritage buildings on Brunswick St or Wickham St would be better. I feel like this photo of a concrete block and a palm tree is boring and not representative of such a vibrant and interesting part of Brisbane. Just some feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.167.129.151 (talk) 05:52, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Street Precinct photo  

message: Please ensure this page doesn't get overrun by staff wanting to promote their venue. - Shiftchange (talk) 19:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birdies spam