Talk:Co-Dependents' Day

message: The "continuity issues" section has been unsourced for over a year. Homer mentioned Wal-Mart in [Viva Ned Flanders], but in On a Clear Day I Can't See My Sister, there's "Sprawl-Mart". Per that article having no section, I am removing the section on this article. --Jedravent 14:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:BraveComboSimpsons.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added specific links to this article in the fair use rationale as per guidelines. - Dravecky 01:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BraveComboSimpsons.jpg

message: Is this sourced? The parody looks much more similar to Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones to me. The Galactic Senate is featured in much greater detail there; also, its plot has received much stronger criticism for being convoluted and boringly concerned with burocratic machiavlism.--Cancun771 (talk) 07:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that there's a great disparity of Senate time between the two films (maybe in the deleted DVD extras).  On the political front, Phantom Menace starts off with a dispute over taxation of trade routes, while Attack of the Clones starts off with a debate over whether to create a full-fledged army for the republic, so Phantom Menace actually seems more appropriate as a target for the Simpsons episode.  And on the Jim-jam (I mean Jar-jar) front, Phantom Menace wins hands down... AnonMoos (talk) 14:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Phantom Menace???

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Co-Dependents' Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724223022/http://starwars.com/community/news/media/f20070724/index.html?page=3 to http://www.starwars.com/community/news/media/f20070724/index.html?page=3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified