lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Arizona Coyotes players

message: While Vaananen skates for Colorado now, plainly the Avalanche  and the Toronto Star  disagree with you.  Perhaps you could come up with an English-language source for your assertion?  Ravenswing 13:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The original author's spelling is incorrect." 

message: I think the players' jersey numbers should also be included in the charts/grids.
Most photos of players are some angle of a front view in which some jersey numbers can be made out.  Since player names are on the back of the jersey, this can make photo ID difficult, even for those familiar with the players.
Also, there seems to be enough room/space in the name box for jersey numbers to be included.
Any thoughts/comments? 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 07:58, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jersey numbers
Talk:I Wonder as I Wander

message: Touching. Not very encyclopedic, but direct from the heart one imagines. --Wetman 03:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unclear as to why this claim was made, but I disagree. This is a well written and extraordinarily well-documented short article about the historical provenance of a song that has reached wide appeal as performed both by classical and popular artists. With the exception of one complaint (request) I will add, I think the article is in a high quality form. What was the issue with the article, Wetman? If a  history is religious (or maudlin, or violent) then the writing of the history must reflect aspects of religion (or emotion, or violence, as it were).  Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Not very encyclopedic

message: The setting by Luciano Berio is my favorite.  Gorgeous.  It's a strange tune, G minor but insisting on ending on C. Antandrus  (talk) 03:41, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As Luciano Berio was born in 1935 this might be a copyvio.  Please verify the source of this version to determine the copyright status before moving--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 22:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Berio setting

message: I just made an edit and thought I should explain. I think it's important to distinguish that John Jacob Niles only claimed to have composed this piece. It's hard to judge, but I have seen a version of "Black is the color of my true love's hair" that was published before he claimed to have written it. There is enough doubt regarding his compositional claims that they should not be given the status of fact here. --DavidANewman 04:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a reasonable consideration, and yet:  "In his unpublished autobiography", that's an extraordinarily detailed description of his encounter with the tune - if inaccurate, it's certainly a beautiful invention. Diomedes Agonistes (talk) 13:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: status of fact, Niles claim

message: Can someone add to the Cover Versions the Linda Ronstadt recording on " a Merry Little Cristmas" CD released in 2000.62.25.109.198 (talk) 10:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Linda Ronstadt version request

message: might want to include the recording of the song on Noël, a Christmas album by Joan Baez, released in 1966  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diomedes Agonistes (talk • contribs) 13:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Settings and Arrangements
Talk:George Hacker

message: The article looks pretty bland and straightforward to me, so why is it flagged?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.99.138 (talk) 17:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  So where is the discussion of disputed objectivity?   

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Children's music

message: This is late. But, as the original author of most of this post (69.212.98.92, back in 2005), I wanted to thank everyone who has worked on this since. I am proud of this post. I used to host a Children's Music show called "Mah Na Mah Na" (think: Doctor Demento meets Mister Rogers) back in the aughts and I am glad we have covered this topic so well. KUDOS! _Mark
I'm going to take a stab at this one, starting with a general description.  I'll try to do a little work every day to get it more 'wikified'. Beanie999 13:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is just to warn anyone who is interested in this article that as part of an attempt to clean up Children's songs I plan to make some adjustments here. At the moment it will involve moving relevant material at the start of this article on Music by children to there and then putting a summary of that article here at the start with a link (as is the wikipedia style) so it should not be a major disruption. I will add any references I have to this article as well. All this unless there are major objections.--Sabrebd (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationalising Children's music and Children's songs

message: How about songs sung by children ? The article does not mention them. Aren't they childrens music ? 83.11.77.142 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Children for children
Talk:Pump Girls

message: Something doesn't add up here... these girls, two of which were born in 1989, were going through "teen depression" when this article says they got together as a group in 1998.  That would make two of the members 9 and one of them 11.
To answer your question as best as I can, the two members who joined in 89 were not of the original group that formed in 98.  The 89 girls joined the group in 2002 and 2003, making them of young adolescent ages.  Brittany who was the 11 year old in 98 was the youngest member of the original group.  Perchance by teen depresion, what is meant is, 'tween' depression?...any other questions?
The information about some of the girls being born in 1989 was bogus and was copied from something that has been replicated at numerous internet sites. I'm not sure where it originated, but one version is available at:
invalid Google link here
I am acquainted with some of the Pump Girls and edited their page to remove any mention of their birth dates.
76.172.139.4 (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Lund

message: Ned help with spelling and grammar. 83.248.26.176 03:55, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since the name of the two German generals have been edited, could someone please redirect from Carl von Arensdorff to Carl von Arenstorff and from Friedrich von Arensdorff to Friedrich von Arenstorff? 83.248.24.253 00:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arenstorff or Arensdorff 

message: I have reverted these recent edits because they changed the number of troops killed in a way that did not fit with the citation. I do not presume to know which figures are correct, but if there appear to be some discussion in the learned world as to the number of troops and casualties then please write that in the article. And most importantly you will need to find some sources for these new figures. --Saddhiyama (talk) 11:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualty figures and number of troops 

message: According to the article, the Dutch marines suffer catastrophic losses but they never seem to participate in the battle.
Some description is clearly missing.
Varlaam (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch losses 

message: The OOB only includes the infantry units in the center. The sizeable cavalry forces on both flanks are missing. 147.78.30.201 (talk) 00:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Battle incomplete
Talk:Joseph Heller

message: I removed the bizarre category "Captain John Yossarian" and placed the works where they belong with this edit.  Heller's masterwork Catch-22 needs to be under novels, not this strange category.  I moved novels up to emphasize Catch-22.  I moved the other items to their appropriate destinations.
I strongly urge that we also get rid of "derivative plays and short stories" and place those under the correct categories.  Although it is true that "Love, Dad" and "Yossarian Survives" are "two chapters cut from the original novel [Catch-22] and subsequently published as stand-alones,"http://articles.latimes.com/2003/mar/30/books/bk-davidulin30 they are either short stories or novellas of their own right as separate published works.  If we want to discuss the "Capt. John Yossarian" pattern, that can be in the main text, but it is not a literary form and is confusing to people like me who are used to reviewing the works of an author.
Compare the organization here with J.D. Salinger or James Joyce, both of whom reused their characters throughout their works. James Joyce is a feature article.
--David Tornheim (talk) 22:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Subsequent to your refactoring, Catch-22 has once again been reclassified, now into a category "Series."  I don't know what that means.  C22 has always and eveywhere been referred to as a novel, to my knowledge, so that is where I have replaced it.  I admit that I have not read all of Heller's titles, but those others which are styled "novels" I am moving to that category.  Possibly the dissenter has lost interest, but if you have not, please explain yourself on this page before moving any more titles.  Thank you.  Ragity (talk) 15:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Have moved 'Closing Time' to #Novels as well.  'Catch-23' I am not familiar with, having only seen a photo.  More work needed here, methinks.  Ragity (talk) 16:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works / Literary Forms 

message: I have run through the IMDB and the opening and closing credits for 'McHales Navy' including the one hour special presented by Fred Astaire 'Seven Against the Sea' and I cannot find credits to or even a mention of Joseph Heller for writing any where. 
Where is the source of Wikis claim to associate Joseph Heller with the show? CS 02:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Wikipedia article about the television series, Heller wrote the teleplay for episode four, "PT 73, Where Are You?". TheScotch (talk) 23:37, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

text: I've added this script to the "Works" section of the article. TheScotch (talk) 01:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joseph Heller writing credit 'McHales Navy' source 

message: So Heller was also a composer? Please clarify.2001:8003:3020:1C00:8C1A:C1BD:886:240 (talk) 06:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teaching composition? 

message: Can we mention S.J. Perelman’s championing of the novel and urging Heller’s acceptance into the American Academy of Arts and Letters, despite its opposition? 2001:8003:3020:1C00:8C1A:C1BD:886:240 (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  S.J. Perelman
Talk:Scott Carpenter

message: Image of Carpenter holding a boy scout emblem, in case you want to include it in the imageless early life section. Kees08 (Talk) 06:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
Can anyone please help me to corroborate the note in this article that says Scott Carpenter was a patient in the Swedish Medical Center in Englewood, CO (near Denver)? Thank you.
EmilW EmilW (talk) 05:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is fully sourced. This fact appears on Burgess (2016) p. 200 Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  carried un-sourced information from this page to another Wiki article
Talk:Multiplan

message: There is a reference on the internet that early builds of Windows 1 (Codename Interface Manager) looked similar to this.
MAybe a mention would be good? Thoughts? 75.28.168.254 (talk) 01:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Windows 1.0

message: Wasn't it also released for the Apple II?  --67.83.176.25 04:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apple II 

message: In the advertisement :Image:Msdosad.jpg, the spelling is "Multiplan", no capital letter at the beginning of "plan". - Samsara (talk • contribs) 12:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling? 

message: Some claims that Visicalc used R1C1, while Lotus introduced A1.Power, D. J., "A Brief History of Spreadsheets", DSSResources.COM, World Wide Web,http://dssresources.com/history/sshistory.html, version 3.6, 08/30/2004   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.161.96.4 (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: R1C1 vs A1

message: It looks like MSX-PLAN is the MSX version of Multiplan, see the screenshots here: http://www.generation-msx.nl/software/microsoft/msx-plan/719/
Pressing SHIFT reveals some other typical Multiplan options: Name, Opt., Print, Trans., Quit.
The start of the 32kB ROM image contains the text "MICROSOFT MP" (can either be MSX-PLAN or MultiPlan). It also has a date: 10/31/84.
And the on-screen text is:
MSX-PLAN  Version 1.00
(C) Microsoft corp. 1985,86
Looks like it can handle: TRUE FALSE COUNT ISNA ISERROR AVERAGE COLUMN STDEV ATAN SQRT LOG10 SIGN ROUND LOOKUP INDEX
So, the question is: is this really an MSX port of Multiplan? To me it looks like it. If so, it should of course be added to this article.
ManuelBilderbeek (talk) 20:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MSX version: MSX-PLAN? 

message: This article needs to be updated to include Epyx as a distributor of the implementation for Commodore computers.  --Lance E Sloan (talk) 15:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The Epyx distribution of version 1.07 also included a Commodore 128 native executable in addition to the Commodore 64 executable allowing access to the added memory and the 80 column screen Kb3pxr (talk) 14:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epyx distribution for Commodore computers 

message: Wikipedia has a serious problem with inaccuracy, as if DOS can be written as Dos willy-nilly. Someone in authority needs to fix this. XENIX and UNIX need to be in caps, along with many other UNIX derivatives.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.193.137 (talk) 05:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you that XENIX should be written in all upper case as that is the only way that it was historically typeset by Microsoft—that said, even in XENIX's hayday the press (e.g., BYTE Magazine) commonly typeset the name as Xenix.  However, Unix is a different case: right from day-1 Unix has been typeset in both capitalised and all upper case forms.  Moreover, even Peter Salus's authoritative book "A Quarter Century of UNIX" uses both spellings within its covers. Christopher Rath (talk) 11:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  XENIX not Xenix!
Talk:TopLink

message: I've deleted the sections where the article sounds like an advertisement. I havn't deleted the sign with the warning because I think the article could be wridden better then now.
Matthias488 (talk) 19:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  marketing 
Talk:Etteilla

message: What evidence is there that Jean Alliette died in 1791? I ask because Alexandre Dumas wrote in "Horror At Fontenay" that he met him in person in 1809.
--Justificatus (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date?

message: This has been dropped, Inadvertently? Does it belong in the article?:
:"Etteilla published his ideas of the correspondences between Tarot, astrology, and the four classical Elements and Four humours, and was the first to issue a revised Tarot deck specifically designed for occult purposes." --Wetman 04:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two of the three given 'citations' are simply not strong enough to substantiate the claim they make. His father was a maître rôtisseur--a caterer. Given the very limited amount of academic research that exists on this man, making claims without citing seems rather problematic. Gnosis1185 (talk) 19:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life 

message: I do not think this is a good translation, and I think we should say "way to entertain yourself", because "recreate yourself" suggests some sort of rebuilding or reinventing process. user:Nightsturm apparently disagrees and has reverted my edits, saying only "recreate, for the translation of French récréer", and I would like to know the reasoning behind that, if any.  Card Zero  (talk) 16:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Recreate is an appropriate translation of the original French word récréer (to recreate) used in Etteilla's French book title on the Tarot. It implies having fun with an activity as well as refreshing, restoring, or reanimating oneself or something after toil or exhaustion. This contrasts with the narrow interpretation of creating something again or reproducing something. Nightsturm (talk) 16:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Way to recreate yourself"
Talk:Aglets (software)

message: Questions:
*What is this technology used for? Could someone list some sample apps?
*How widespread is it? Does it have "competition" (other frameworks, either Java or not, that are used for the same thing) ?
Akb4 20:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Aglets is one of mobile mobile agent platform. Mobile agent is a fundamental technology of software development, just like　Object-oriented programming or Functional programming. So, your question is similar to "What is Object-orientd  programming?" or "Is there any sample apps of Java API" :). Unfortunately, mobile agent technology is in research step, so, showing a practical sample of mobile agent may difficult.Because this techonology is in research step, not in practical use step, there's no "competition", but, as a "congener", there is(was) "Telescript" (made by General Magic).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.230.87.183 (talk) 17:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  uses, distribution 

message: This article appears to fail Notability tests.  It was a small open source project that attracted some attention 20 years ago when new, but which was never adopted widely.  Wikipedia does not need to catalog every software library every created.  Is there any evidence that this was really used?  All I can find are old articles suggesting it could become the next big thing.  Seems to me this should just be folded into Mobile agent. —dgiestc 19:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this actually notable?
Talk:Local food network

message: This is a very rough stub pulled from a bit of my research in the area. Please contribute or give me a little bit of space to bring the article up to speed!
: I categorized this article. 
: There are citations within the article, but no references listed. If the references could be included in the references section I created, this would improve this article. Minnaert 02:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Everything You Know Is Wrong

message: I got "mind-boggler" from IMdB. I apologize if I misquoted the album, which I do not own a copy of at present. Perhaps they say both? Richard K. Carson 05:12, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The cover (box) of the videotape has "Reebus Caneebus" - not "Rebus Cannibus" as in the article - and the Firesign web site agrees.  Paul 22:20, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of a character 

message: OK, I bought the album on CD for my first listen since college (a loooong time ago), so now I have the wording right for the "film".  I'm adding it to the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Synaptidude (talk • contribs) 08:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for digging this up; but it's pretty obvious it can't be used in the article because it's copyrighted, and reprinting the entire skit would exceed the amount allowable for fair use. JustinTime55 (talk) 20:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Government training film
Talk:Quality of Life (film)

message: Why should someone typing in "Quality of Life" into the Wikipedia search engine get a little-known movie called "Quality of Life"????? Quality of life is an important subject. A movie called "Quality of Life" is relatively unimportant on the scale of things. This should be called "Quality of Life (Movie)", and should be represented on a disambiguation page. Anytime a person types in quality of life, whether in capital letters or not, he should get the topic at hand, which is just that: quality of life, which is an important sociological subject. It should not take back seat to some little-known movie that happens to have the name "Quality of Life." What do you think? Runt (talk) 02:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't the name of this article be "Quality of Life (Movie)?
Talk:Pathological liar

message: Weasel words should be avoided. A copy of this article with weasel terms bolded is shown below.
A pathological liar is someone who often embellishes his or her stories in a way that he or she believes will impress people. Some think a pathological liar is different from a normal liar in that a pathological liar believes the lie he or she is telling to be true—at least in public—and is "playing" the role. It is not clear, however, that this is the case, and others hold that pathological liars know precisely what they are doing.  Making up stories and at the same time believing them is known as  confabulation.  The term "pathological liar" is not an official clinical diagnosis however most psychiatrists agree that pathological lying is often the result of a mental disorder or low self-esteem.
Which people specifically believe this? Invitatious 15:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel words 

message: I've redone the entire page.  All of the weasel words have been removed.  I may have mis-spelled some words.  Tiny.ian 00:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Totally redone
Category talk:Petroleum

message: It would be useful to sort most of these articles into subcategories, especially since most people have no idea what many of these things are (including me). -- Beland 05:58, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: here - DOE website page. I'd like to see this incorporated somehwere into Wikipedia, either as a "see also" link, or as a file, or whatever. It's information that I went to WP first to look for, then google second. I don't have time to do it myself. --RealGrouchy 01:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is top 10 in 2011. I would prefer energy units like TWh to barrels.
US Imports of Petroleum 2011	US Imports of Petroleum 2011
                            	1000 barrels/day
Canada                      	2,670
Mexico                      	1,218
Saudi Arabia                	1,187
Venezuela                   	979
Nigeria                     	876
Russia                      	609
Iraq                        	473
Algeria                     	396
Colombia                    	395
Angola                      	335
Watti Renew (talk) 11:26, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Oil Imports - top 15 source countries 

message: Does the article on Bush's professional life really belong here? 68.145.207.92 02:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bush?

message: Beagel categories may include introduction in the subject. The list I added deservs in my opinion a place as introduction: . However, better fit could be :Category: Petroleum by country‎.
 
:Top 10 oil producers in 2011 were (Mt): 1) Saudi Arabia 517 (12.9 %), 2) Russia 510 (12.7 %), 3) United States 346 (8.6 %), 4) Iran 215 (5.4 %), 5) China 203 (5.1 %), 6) Canada 169 (4.2 %), 7) United Arab Emirates 149 (3.7 %), 8) Venezuela 148 (3.7 %), 9) Mexico 144 (3.6 %), 10) Nigeria 139 (3.5 %), Rest of the world 1 471 (36.6 %), World 4 011 (100 %).Key world statistics 2012 IEA
Watti Renew (talk) 10:46, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top 10 oil producers