lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yamaha DSP-1

message: Yamaha's later offerings did not include the variety of settings and options the DSP1 had. I personally find myself using about 3 different settings, and I notice that Yamaha's surround sound and theatre receivers currently have those same settings (or their analogs), so if I were to upgrade, I wouldn't miss much. Still, the DSP-1 is a pretty amazing device, and probably brought surround sound back in vogue.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.242.50.237 (talk • contribs) 
----
Although I experimented with many of the parameters, I also used only a few.  It was the unit that convinced me that surround sound had a future in mid to high end audio.  And it was very unlike the subequent surround sound processing that came after (such as Dolby Surround).  Instead of simply decoding a precoded recording, the DSP took a standard signal and faithfully recreated the echo and reverb qualities of various real world environments and and a few artificial ones.  It then allowed the user to increase or decrease select parameters of each environment.
However, it suffered -like most units of its day- from poor digital filtering on the Digital-to-analog converter leaving most digital audio components of the time with a high pitched buzzing noise.  At the time of its engineering, digital sound was still in its infancy.  It was still not widely accepted yet - especially by audiophiles who generally considered the frequency range of digital content inferior to that of analogue as well as the (then) poor state of digital circuitry as substandard when compared to analogue.  This buzzing was worse in some modes than in others and even made some settings intolerable.  I bought one of the first units available in 1986 so I don't know when they resolved that problem.
I did get to hear the DSP-2 and the buzz was notably absent - but so were a number of the settings and user configurable parameters.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.130.69.53 (talk) 14:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bonefish

message: As a fly fisherman, bonefish are partly made of an invisibility cloack, kryptonite, and go-go-gadget-speedracer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.248.240.132 (talk) 01:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

message: Why is it called "bonefish"? Drsruli (talk) 11:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Google suggests it's partly because of bony coverings in/over the eyes, and mostly because the tasty flesh has lots of bones.--Mr Fink (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Unemployment Action Center

message: not notable per google hits ~290. :) Dlohcierekim 23:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I recall doing my first unemployment hearings with the Unemployment Action Center in 1978 when I was a first year student at NYU School of Law.  At the time, the UAC was a project of the National Lawyers Guild.  I recall that it started with the Brooklyn Law School chapter of the NLG, and our chapter at NYU was the next to participate. I don't know how long UAC had been operating at Brooklyn before it came to NYU. It was great for me to feel that I could actually help someone in need, and gain experience as an advocate.  I still enjoy doing unemployment hearings. r3 17:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UAC roots go back to 1978
Talk:Mercury selenide

message: I'm dumping properties here. What can be moved into chembox has been moved already. --Rifleman 82 16:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Properties
Talk:Strathclyde Business School

message: Support as they are the same thing. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: I propose to undo the edits by Melissahmccrindle as she works at SBS and clearly hasn't read article guidlines on neutrality.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a student prospectus!
JustWinBaby (talk) 17:31, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Further to the above, it appears that at least one major contributor to this article has a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus has a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting  (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted. 
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.strath.ac.uk/business/glasgowbusinesssummit/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pinehurst Lake

message: I want to add this to the page, but I'm not too sure how. can someone help? --MyLegAlta 23:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken a shot at it. For pointers, see Wikipedia:Picture tutorial. Melchoir 03:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Meg Austin

message: I can't find any references, but I was positive that Meg was USMC. Can someone confirm? --Stretch 23:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm, could you please sign your comments as yourself rather than me, Kinkaid00772000--Stretch 02:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Downside Up

message: No question about it: merge Downside Up (box set) into this page. There's no need for the parenthetical addition, and there's little additional information in the other page, so it should be brought here. Anyone else have any thoughts? Folkor 23:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merger, although it looks to me like the text in "Downside Up" should be used.  What is now on "Downside Up (box set)" reads like it was lifted directly from the album's press release, not to mention it's not formatted correctly. -- eo 18:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge - and remove redundant/copyvio material. --Doc Tropics 18:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merger 
Talk:Inga Abel

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 06:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: *Corresponding English-language article: Inga Abel
*Worth doing because: no article, English Article requested by Wikipedia:Find-A-Grave_famous_people/A/Aa
*Originally Requested by: Nczempin 21:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:de:Inga Abel|Abel, Inga]] (actress)
Talk:Leucanthemum × superbum

message: The photographer gave me permission to post it here but only with her copyright notice.  I tried to explain about Wikipedia's policies but I guess I didn't explain it well enough so that she would want to just donate the picture.  I hope that someone else can take a picture of some Shasta daisies and post it here and also on the article about Luther Burbank.  It seems silly to have an article about a flower with no picture.Steve Dufour 05:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorry about the picture

message: Surely there are better references for the parentage of the "shasta daisy"? The parentage given in this article indicates this is an intergeneric hybrid, and thus its generic classification as Leucanthemum would be incorrect. 160.111.254.17 (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If the parentage is indeed as per the article, it would need a nothogenus name. However, so far I haven't found one, so it will have to stay as it is. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parentage?
Talk:Francesco Maria Grimaldi

message: I asked the original author (User_talk:Heron) to add a reference for da Vinci, which he did, and when I read the linked page I interpreted it as saying that da Vinci's involvement in observing diffraction remains questionable; so I changed it to say "by some accounts". Dicklyon 23:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The da Vinci question

message: Umm, Galileo published his results on falling objects and their distance fallen being proportional to the dquare of time well before 1640 ... why is Grimaldi getting credit for this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.223.11.2 (talk) 19:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably it should saying confirming rather than discovering.  This relationship of distance and time is apparently originally due to Domingo de Soto, sixty years before Galileo, but Grimaldi did the most accurate experimental investigations of it. See this book. Dicklyon 21:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free Fall?? 

message: This article only cites one source, and it's from Wikipedia! Please people, when you cite, cite a real source! -134.50.75.7 (talk) 03:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite Sources
Talk:Holmes on Homes

message: I moved this paragraph to the Mike Holmes page, as it is more appropriate there. Flyguy649 18:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance on Ellen DeGeneres 

message: Some screenshots and the titlescreen would be nice. 70.55.87.55 (talk) 11:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RqImg 

message: Some more detail on the workmen's specialties would be good (like actually listing the specialists used commonly/regularly/intermittantly on the show) and headshots also. 70.55.87.55 (talk) 11:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: So does that count as part of the series? 70.29.213.241 (talk) 05:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should at least be mentioned, even if it's technically a separate series. I would add it, but I don't know how it fits in (separate series, special, etc.) 75.159.229.114 (talk) 03:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holmes In New Orleans 

message: The entire intro talks about the show's time, popularity, channel, format, etc. It doesn't say what the show is about. Certainly one of the first sentences of the intro should summarize the premise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.117.0 (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  intro sucks 

message: I was wondering why sherri holmes was not mentioned as part of the current or past crew on the page that lists the episode names?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.117.213 (talk) 00:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  crew members 

message: My intention is to fork off the episode listings to a separate article.  On that page I will put them into a table, condense the summaries, and add other information such as original air date 09:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive overhaul plans. 

message: I propose the episode descriptions are split into a new article. While they are a good chunk of the content, it will make the page much cleaner. --Natural RX 01:54, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Is anyone going to make the split? Op47 (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Evidently not. Having looked abit further, I note that the article is no large enought to require splitting and that the episodes are not referenced and unlikely to be noteable. I am therefore removing the split tag. Op47 (talk) 14:29, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes Split
Talk:Cinderella Castle

message: Can someone change it to The Castle at Night but in normal operating season or say that this picture was taken when Christmas Decorations were up, because it's not how it usually looks on a regular non-seasonal night  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windyshadow32 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castle at Night  

message: Where is cillerenda castle? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fresheneesz (talk • contribs) 00:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is cillerenda castle? 

message: What is ment here by "cable"? --Zulu55 (talk) 14:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it is talking about the cable that Tinker Bell "flies" on for the fireworks show. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "here the cable is attached to tower 20" - which cable? 
Talk:Annie Get Your Gun (song)

message: Does anyone have an idea what this song is about?  No one has posted before but it's worth a try.  the lyrics are very interesting and suggest a few possible meanings.  the begining "She goes for her medical/She’s passed, it’s a miracle/She’s up over the moon/She whistles nonsense tunes" suggests an unwanted mediecal problem, and the fact that the song is about a singer she knows, i wonder if she was afraid of an STD or an unwanted pregnancy?  either fit.
That makes sense.  Does she know the singer?  One line says she's banging on his drum, so is she in his band, or is that in the figure of speech sense?  Her being in his band would fit with the other lyrics saying "what's that she's playing".  Has Squeeze ever commented on its meaning?  70.238.249.124 23:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Herbert Joseph Thomas

message: His citation clearly states that SGT Thomas was a Reservist.  Shouldn't his affiliation be USMCR?  HedgeFundBob (talk) 15:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reservist
Talk:Alive (Melissa O'Neil song)

message: I thought people would appreciate that I post both Canadian Idol Finale performances as external links here. Not many people knew about this hit single until after Melissa O'Neil released it on her album. I think they'd appreciate being able to listen to both versions. - 154.5.130.212 23:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Idol Finale Performances 
Talk:Gallup Outlaws

message: Gallup Talons → Gallup Outlaws – {the team has changed its name} M. Burmy 
===Survey===
:*Support I nominated it, why wouldn't I support it?  M. Burmy
:Done. —Nightstallion (?) 06:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :*Support I nominated it, why wouldn't I support it?  M. Burmy
:Done. —Nightstallion (?) 06:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:County of La Marche

message: This page is in error. Almodis of La Marche had married Roger le Poitevin sometime around 1086. Their children, Aldebert IV, Boso IV, and Odo II would rule La Marche. It was a Montgomery count, not a Lusignan count that sold La Marche and its 3 castles to King Henry II in 1177.
John would grant Hugh IX de Lusignan the county in 1200. The only connection being that his ancestor, Hugh V had married a sister of the count. Dragon1
: Here you will find reality : COMTES de la MARCHE Papydenis 16:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Auntie Anne's

message: This article sounds like an advertisement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.33.157.115 (talk) 23:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: I think that its done. Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 23:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Cleanup

message: News item from December 31, 2013: "Auntie Anne's continues international growth" @ http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2013/12/31/auntie-annes-continues-international.html --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  To consider as a source 

message: Good morning
I am bedoor, i live in Kuwait
I need to ask you about your agency,, I want to take your agency and , 
I would like to know your terms.. 188.71.209.87 (talk) 05:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agency
Talk:RL (complexity)

message: What does RLP stand for. We need the full terminiology--Light current 23:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Since 2006, no one fond references to support this article.. So, I move the content here.
Please, find the references and explain the sense of abbreviation RLP in this case, because I suspect, the content happened to be entitled
RLP by error.
What should we do with such an article?
dima (talk) 03:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a very common complexity class, but it's more commonly described as RL rather than RLP. The later name is less commonly used but was chosen for the purpose of differentiation. But this just confused everyone, so now it's at RL. Dcoetzee 07:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I know how to cite things. I hadn't gotten around to it. I'll add some stuff. Dcoetzee 10:54, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

text: 1/3 is just the constant typically used in the definition, because it's a convenient simple fraction that satifies 0 < p < 1/2. A formal definition has to select some constant, and it's pedagogically better to introduce the concept with a single concrete value than with a class of equivalent definitions. A number of other randomized classes use similar definitions. I don't feel like this needs to be justified. Dcoetzee 01:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I've also removed some incorrect facts you added - RLP does not stand for Randomized Logarithmic-space Problems, and there's no reason to believe Stanford invented the abbreviation RL (I have no idea who did). Complexity Zoo is just a list of facts and references, and is not a primary or original source for any material. You have a right to demand references, but please refrain from inventing facts without sources. Dcoetzee 01:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I can, yes, that's a good idea. Dcoetzee 18:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need this article?
Talk:Fritz X

message: Shouldn't this page be called Ruhrstahl SD 1400 X?
As I know the Fritz X is only a nickname for this weapon.
Anyway, I added a redirect from Ruhrstahl SD 1400 X to this page. Talamus 23:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the page 

message: More information can be found at: http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/fritz.html For example they say that the base of this weapon was an ordinary 1400kg bomb (PC 1400), hence the 1400 in the name.
If someone got free time for checking and wikifying... Thank you! Talamus 00:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a guided bomb (now called a PGM).  TREKphiler hit me ♠  04:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional info 

message: Two issues.
:"spoofing, in which the missile was given a signal sending it out of control, into a stall or spiralling dive."
Doesn't it also include simply diverting the bomb off-target?
:"lost steam (and thus all power" 
Is this necessarily true? It may be in this instance, but I've heard of cases where loss of steam didn't consequently mean loss of all ship's power, & I've a hunch it wasn't that simple, especially when she'd have had diesel auxiliaries, no?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  04:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: My [[Irish Rovers|ex X]], [[Majel Roddenberry|Number One]]

message: I am not sure that it is actually a glide bomb. 1) Its fins seem to be flat, so they are not lifting surfaces, 2) tail surfaces have got some volume, but they are too far from the center of mass and too small to provide gliding. So I believe this is a mistake. At least one source says something like that, see p. 6. RajatonRakkaus (talk) 09:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glide bomb? 

message: The official name of the bomb was Ruhrstahl SD 1400 X. Fritz X was just a nickname. I suggest the article should be renamed. --Lysytalk 20:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That was just one of the names it had, the most common is Fritz X hence the article title. --Denniss (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruhrstahl SD 1400 X
Talk:SIGCUM

message: The link for the word "depth" in the section "Introduction of the Machine" leads to a disambiguation page, and the correct link to follow is not clear (in fact, it doesn't seem to be there at all). Anyone knows the correct route? 69.128.162.197 23:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, but I don't think we have an article on crypto depth yet. I've made it into a redlink, anyway. — Matt Crypto 15:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Depth link
Talk:The End of the Whole Mess

message: I cut:
:Robert discovered this "Fountain of Youth" doing research into the Branch Davidian events.
This can't be correct - the story being first published in 1986. Unless King made changes when the story was republished -  which he has done in other works (see Home Delivery (Stephen King) for an example - to update topical references. Ellsworth 00:01, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just reread this story.  In it, Waco was notable as a place with extremely low levels of violence.  So no, he's not referencing the Branch Davidian events. --Irrevenant [ talk ] 13:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does the summary for "The End of the Whole Mess" say  it is implied that the human race will eventually die off 'as adults start to forget how to care for newborn children'?  Where in the story does the narrator imply that adults will forget how to take care of babies?  Amberbrannon (talk) 03:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Navy League Wrennette Corps

message: This page has been created as part of a mini project to split and disambiguate Sea Cadets.  It would benefit from further research about the organisation itself and the timeline of its history Fiddle Faddle 00:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bio Performance Inc.

message: This page is filled with advertising, apparenty copyright violation, and a lack of actual encyclopedic data -- it reads like a brochure for PB. I've removed the majority of the article on the premise that a stub is better than an advertisement. Unfortunately, I don not know enough about BP to write a reasonable article myself. I'm putting this message here in hopes that someone may expand the article in an encyclopedic manner.  If not, I'll revisit in a week or two and we may need to consider deletion. -- dcclark (talk) 00:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I should have checked for previous speedy-deletions before. This article has been deleted as blatant advertising, I am thus nominating for speedy deletion again. Note that I left my (heavily edited) version of the page, the previous version is most obviously an advertisment. -- dcclark (talk) 00:25, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Jazz cellists

message: Marked for cleanup because someone put a bio on this page, probably mistakenly (appears to be an autobiography). Category pages have an auto generated list of links and optionally a brief description of the category.
See What goes on a category page
RosinDebow 00:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed bio after explaining guidelines to user and mutually agreeing it shouldn't appear there. RosinDebow 16:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled