Talk:Socialist Reich Party

message: I think that the editor of this article should identify the fact that even though the "Socialist" Reich Party CALLS itself a "Socialist" party that no other people who regard themselves Socialists (whether Marxist, Anarchist, Social Democrat or otherwise) would recognize the "Socialist" Reich party as being Socialist. In fact, Fascism is a defence mechanism of CAPITALISM that it reverts to when it is both a) in serious decline and b) it is facing some kind of threat. A Capitalist State is a state where the bourgeoisie is the ruling class (meaning they own the 'means of production' and they hold state power). In Nazi Germany the Bourgeoisie were still the ruling class so therefore it is still Capitalist. User:Leon Trotsky 16:17, 12 August, 2005
:Your analysis is clearly a Marxist one and therefore not NPOV. Ii's clear from the article that it was a neo-Nazi party. - Johnbull 14:52, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Why the "Socialist" Reich Party Isn't Socialist''' 

message: "According to Martin Lee, in The Beast Reawakens, the SRP never openly criticised the Soviet Union[4] because the Soviet Union funded the SRP as it held anti-American and pro-Soviet views. The German Communist Party, on the other hand, did not receive Soviet funds, because it was viewed as "ineffectual"[5]."
the SRP was banned 1952, the German Communist Party was founded in 1968, so this sentence doesn't make sense. Could it be that the Communist Party of Germany (forbidden in 1956) was meant?
Yes, this is obviously a quetion of confused semantics.--Dudeman5685 01:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Something is wrong

message: "claimed that the USA built the gas ovens of the Dachau concentration camp after the War" - This is true. Today you will find no mention of gas chambers at Dachau.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.242.71.116 (talk) 16:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dachau Gas Chambers

message: :Image:Sozialistische reichspartei.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sozialistische reichspartei.PNG

message: :Image:Sozialistische reichspartei.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sozialistische reichspartei.PNG

message: The party was really strasserite, like is said in the infobox (their founders seems to have been mainstream nacional-socialists until 1945)? And is a sucessor of the Black Front? Nothing in the articles Black Front or German Social Union (West Germany) gives any indication of this.--MiguelMadeira (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Otto Ernst Remer was never a member of the NSDAP. --105.12.6.99 (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Front? Strasserism? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Socialist Reich Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516131503/http://www.verfassungsschutz.bayern.de/service/mitteilungen/01573/index.php to http://www.verfassungsschutz.bayern.de/service/mitteilungen/01573/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is this flag just fictional or is there an actual historical source on it being used, because i can't find anything.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markush100 (talk • contribs) 07:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the source on the flag used?