lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Évora District

message: Olivenza is a spanish municipality therefore it cannot be part of a portuguese district.Filipeacaeiro 15:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Portuguese state does not recognize the anexation of Olivença in the Spanish state. In official maps the border in that area is never drawn. Of course Olivença is de facto Spanish, and the Portuguese state does not push the issue. Still... it is officialy in the disctict of Évora. The world is a complex place... The Ogre 18:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Complex, indeed. Joaopais 14:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Working on creating a more neutral article, please give me feedback if you have any Luiz187 (talk) 04:59, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olivenza? 
Talk:Lisbon District

message: pls move to Lisboa District TrueColour (talk) 23:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Viana do Castelo District

message: Can details of post-2012 elections be added. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elections 
Talk:Detroit station

message: Does the depot have 9 or 2 platforms? Fila943 (talk) 06:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platforms 

message: Per discussion here, I merged content from the article on QLine's Baltimore Street station here, as the stations are adjacent. Previous edit history is located at Baltimore Street station.--Cúchullain t/c 18:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: It might make sense to move this article to Detroit station (Amtrak) and turn Detroit station into a disambiguation page. Otherwise wayfinding to Fort Street, Brush, and Michigan Central is a little difficult. Mackensen (talk) 13:58, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguate?
Talk:On the Frontiers

message: I took the liberty of removing the in-universe tag. My rationale is as follows: all of the articles on the Valérian et Laureline comic books start with "title Y is volume XX in the French comic book (or bande dessinée) science fiction series Valérian and Laureline created by writer Pierre Christin and artist Jean-Claude Mézières." This text also includes links to articles on the creators and the Valérian universe. I don't see how it can be said more clearly. Nerdjob (talk) 03:33, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: In-universe tag removed

message: This sounds ... kindasorta like a sci-fi version of the play On the Frontier, or a work that draws a lot of inspiration? Does anyone know more about this? Ford MF (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Adaptation?
Talk:The Rector of Veilbye

message: I've rewritten the introduction and the synopsis to better reflect the story -- and am raising the class of this project to 'Start.' CactusWriter (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Project Class

message: The article name should be moved to The Rector of Veilbye. This is the common title of the book on in its English version. A quick google search shows 187 hits for The Rector of Veilbye versus only 9 for The Parson of Veilbye (only 1 that wasn't referencing Wikipedia).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CactusWriter (talk • contribs) 19:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Book Name
Talk:Sort code

message: Bankleitzahl, the german term for this thing, redirects to this page. Yet there is but the briefest mention of the BLZ and no section on the german system. This could stand improvement. Not merely because the page could stand globalization but also because of the redirect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.109.167 (talk) 20:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The redirect of Bankleitzahl to this article was a sloppy bit of editing.  Ideally we should haev an article dedicated to brank identification codes around the world to which both sort code and  Bankleitzahl coudl be redirected.  I have meanwhile undone the redirect in Bankleitzahl and added a "See also" in that article. Martinvl (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bankleitzahl 

message: There is also a range of 00 sort codes. These seem to be only used within IBAN account numbers for international Euro transfers into the UK
Avuba prepaid Euro accounts, held with Raphaels Bank UK had IBANs resembling GBcc RAPH 0099 98nn nnnn nn, a fictitious sort code would be 00-99-98
Revolut prepaid card accounts has IBANs resembling GBcc REVO 0099 70nn nnnn nn, a fictitious sort code would be 00-99-70
Can anyone shed some light on these? UK Payments Sort Code finder has nothing on those. --77.179.101.40 (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "00" Sort Codes
File talk:Rainf.gif

message: This image of the Royal Australian Infantry badge is available for use by Wikipedia under the conditions of the copyright tag provided with the image. Please do not delete this out of your own ignorance. The copyright link is at the botom of the page Ozdaren 15:18, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The rationale for use of this image has not changed. It is still allowable under the terms set out by the Commonwealth of Australia. Ozdaren (talk) 23:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ride quality

message: This article has no references. Here are some links to possible references:
* http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/363889.html
* http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel3/4827/13369/00611895.pdf?arnumber=611895
* http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2004cpr/chap16b.htm
* http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=767723.768539&dl=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=16928370&CFTOKEN=91475034
--SueHay 15:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Finnish Army (1939)

message: I've just looked at some page sizes; the US Army page is about five times the size of the main Finnish Army page, and if this page was merged into the main page it wouldn't make it too long. Would anyone mind if I merged it into the main Finnish Army page? Buckshot06 (talk) 02:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Finnish Army?
Talk:Antti Heikkilä

message: The redirect Antti Heikkilae has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  TartarTorte 20:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Antti Heikkilae]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Spirit of the Winter War

message: Some thoughts on improving this article (before someone gets the idea to AfD it):
There are quite a few value-laden assertions/judgments in this short article, especially in the introduction (which remains a rather weak source of context). These need to be cited to appropriate sources. As it is, this article reads somewhat like a mild polemic. Removal of peacock terms would also be beneficial in improving its encyclopedic tenor.
The origins of the term also need to be better elucidated (beyond simply noting their post-war development). 
The "Significance" section should be expanded (and probably retitled). The "Red cannonfodder" issue is a recent political side issue and should be treated as such. Askari Mark (Talk) 04:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags
Talk:Valaam Monastery

message: Even if the date of the founding of the monastery is disputed, the lifespan of Sergius of Valaam cannot deviate as much. Local tradition places him at the 10th century, I tend to believe this. -- Petri Krohn 01:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What kind of evidence do you have? --Tellervo 15:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did [[Sergius of Valaam]] live? 

message: founded in 1389 by Efrem, a monk from Kashin later canonized as Yefrem of Perekomy.
: There is quite a lot of information about this saint online. The dates of his life are 20 September 1412 (birth) and 26 September 1492 (death). So it does not square up with the monastery's foundation in 1389. --Ghirla-трёп- 20:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yefrem of Perekomy 

message: Many of the newly rich oligarchs of Russia have donated huge sums to the restoration of the monastery. President Vladimir Putin has a private villa there.
:This urban legend needs to be well sourced. I have yet to find an oligarch patronizing the Russian Orthodox Church. Most of those "oligarchs" are not ethnically Russian and don't practice Orthodoxy. The Russian newly-rich are predominantly atheist. --Ghirla-трёп- 21:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Oligarchs" and Putin

message: The following text is pasted here from the article Finnish Orthodox Church. As the text overlapped with the contents of this article, please see if the text has reusable elements here. --Drieakko 07:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text from Finnish Orthodox Church 

message: Кладбищенская проповедь--Anidaat (talk) 13:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the usage during being a military station
Talk:Massachusetts Avenue (metropolitan Boston)

message: Harvard and Porter Squares are listed, but Central and Kendall are not. They are very important and are along mass ave. --Dorazine (talk) 01:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have doubts that Central Sq. has landmark status, but if there is a consensus to the contrary it would be easy enough to add it to the list.  Kendall Sq., on the other hand, is not on Mass. Ave. (though it may seem to be, on account of the Red Line station sequence).  Cheers, Hertz1888 (talk) 02:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Places 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Massachusetts Avenue - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 01:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Though I don't support any title change of this article, Massachusetts Avenue (Greater Boston) or Massachusetts Avenue (Metro Boston) would have addressed the concerns expressed. Lentower (talk) 10:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Papaverine

message: The diabetes paragraph in relation to erection failure was removed as it has no relevance to papaverine at all. --93.97.181.187 (talk) 23:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mehanism section 

message: I'm using the file supplied by CAS to fix some CAS nos.  The one we had is also found in the file, but it is for the hydrochloride salt; I changed it to match for the free base, which is shown in the structure diagram above. Walkerma (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAS No. 

message: The ball-and stick model used for this compound is incorrect.  There is no hydrogen atom bonded to the nitrogen; this is readily apparent both from the three covalent bonds already devoted to carbon atoms, and from a simple count of the hydrogen atoms in the model (there are 22 in the model, versus 21 in the formula).  216.130.237.193 (talk) 18:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ball-and-Stick Model 

message: I see a lot of advertisements for trimix gel. Is this a thing? (See Talk:Trimix (injection)]]. 76.194.214.123 (talk) 09:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimix gel?
Talk:Björn Eriksson

message: Although it may seem convenient to number all these mythical kings, there is no general agreement, and confusion arises. All these bearers of names like Björn have different nicknames and different family relationships in different sources, and cannot be seamlessly harmonized. The article labels this Björn as Björn III. However, in Linköping Cathedral there is a stone tablet saying that the church was founded 813 by king Björn III. The tablet was put there by Messenius. My guess he that he counted Jordanes' Berig as Björn I, a symptom of Swedish Gothicismus. But at least such a number on a monument is a reference. The numbering system here (with Björn (III) Eriksson) looks like original research to me. 
I am duplicating here what I wrote at Talk:Björn at Haugi#Numbering mythical kings. Note that the present king's designation as Charles XVI has its basis in the same established way of counting. /Pieter Kuiper 10:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering legendary kings 
Talk:Anund Uppsale

message: Article said about casting lots:
:(they were probably casting runes)
This is ORish and not in accord with policies. In order to be acceptable, a citation is needed, not Tacitus, he was a tourist among West Germanics in or near the Roman Empire. This text is about Norse (North Germanics from 700 years later). Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 23:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eysteinn Beli

message: I posted this elsewhere but i will now post it here. SergeWoodzing has removed succession from all the prehistoric kings just with no real reasoning. He takes the highhorse position and says he has the authority to to do so and doesn't elaborate as to why, just that it "is silly". 
By that logic literally all the other legendary kings of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark would have to be edited as well as ALL legendary kings of Europe, good luck getting that done. Eysteinn Beli and so forth all have this form of succession. It's just to provide a easier understanding of the supposed timeline. Henceforth why it says "legendary title". Not normal kingship. This is incredibly petty and silly. There was kings in Scandinavia long before it there were united countries, it almost feels like you're trying to erase that fact.
SergeWoodzing's fixation on trying to remove the concept of succession from the protohistoric discussion just isn't right. I have stated that there is a difference between normal kingship and legendary such. The ones that are featured on the pages where we have collided are not as part of the normal Swedish monarch tradition of succession as it's clearly shown to be part of the "legendary" prehistoric discussion hence why it's called "legendary title" when it comes to succession. By your logic you would literally have to go to every single legendary monarch page in Europe and remove all forms of succession from the legendary discussion.
You cannot shape the narrative of history just because you don't like it, that has nothing to do with warring. Stating that it would be warring is just trying to prevent other people from getting their opinions as to yours into the discussion. There was always a form of succession to these pages before you came along and no offense I'm not sure what your motive is as you aren't exactly elaborating. I won't undo what you've done further since i know you'll just throw a fit and i don't hate time for that, life is too short and Wikipedia is Wikipedia. Next time try to raise the discussion to a bit higher level instead of just getting mad and crying about me "warring" when you don't get as you want. It's childish and immature. --Gaudi9223 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: To other users: This has been copied and pasted at 4 different discussions. See Talk:Sigurd Ring#In favor of "succession". --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: In favor of "succession"
Talk:Hugleik

message: Would it not be a good idea to rename this article, to 'Hugleik (Yngling dynasty)', Hugleik son of Alf, or something like that? It would make things less confusing for interwiki links. /Pieter Kuiper 11:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose 'Hugleik (Edda)'. Also those who believe that Hygelac of history developed into Hugleik of legend should be fine with this article name. /Pieter Kuiper 15:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:Miss World 1979

message: Was not disqualified at the competition. That according to a news article here. Something happened her swimsuit, that's all. The source for her disqualification? IMDb. IMDb fails WP:RS. ...William 16:59, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tatiana Capote 
Talk:Miss World 1980

message: I have restored the judges section content (diff). This was removed with an edit summary rationale of "removed unsourced and/or irrelevant sections" (diff). The content is directly relevant, significant and of importance relative to the article's topic, and its omission reduces the quality of the article. Information about the people who judge the performance of a large number of contestants in a contest is highly relevant. Provision of information regarding the judges is credible to provide a balanced overview of the event. The content restored is also backed with a reliable source in the article. North America1000 02:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judges section restored 
Talk:Miss World 1981

message: I have restored the map image to the article (diff). It was removed with the rationale "removed fancruft and/or irrelevant picture" (diff). The map does not constitute "fancruft", and it is directly and highly relevant relative to the article's topic. The map provides a functional overview of country participants and event results for Wikipedia's readers. Its omission reduces the quality of the article. North America1000 03:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map restored 
Talk:Miss World 1983

message: I have restored the judges section content (diff). The content is directly relevant, significant and of importance relative to the article's topic, and its omission reduces the quality of the article. Information about the people who judge the performance of a large number of contestants in a contest is highly relevant. Provision of information regarding the judges is credible to provide a balanced overview of the event. It's very likely that offline sources are available that provide coverage. Internet coverage of 1983 events is not plentiful, because the internet was not in widespread usage at this time. North America1000 04:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judges section restored 
Talk:Miss World 1985

message: I have restored the judges section content (diff). The content is directly relevant, significant and of importance relative to the article's topic, and its omission reduces the quality of the article. Information about the people who judge the performance of a large number of contestants in a contest is highly relevant. Provision of information regarding the judges is credible to provide a balanced overview of the event. North America1000 14:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judges section restored 
Talk:Eltham Palace

message: If anyone has access to interior photographs of the palace, specifically the entrance hall, I'd love to use them on Swedish Wikipedia. (Pls contact me on my talk page, as I don't always keep track of the watchlist here.) Thanks a lot in advance! /Urbourbo (talk) 10:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, the first pic in your gallery seems to picture the entrance hall roof. Would be great if you'd upload it to Commons! All the best, /Urbourbo (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interior pictures wanted 

message: The whole bit about “reputed escape tunnels” needs something to back it up. The brick structure behind Holy Trinity church is called the Conduit Head, and is more prosaically described in the history that I have read as part of a system to supply water to Eltham Palace, not to effect egress from it. The article says the “escape tunnels” are a little known fact - perhaps it’s because they don’t exist, or are something else? Jock123 (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Escape Tunnels? 

message: The author's site has been moved. I made the change but a bot reverted it. I now revert the bot's edit. AlexisHuxley  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.228.62.23 (talk) 12:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Eltham Palace: An Alternative Guide 

message: In Filming, Marina Diamandis filmed her music video for  Froot. But under Filming, it's not included. Gaga's Little Monsterrr (talk) 12:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you got a source? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video
Talk:1917 French Army mutinies

message: According to this article 'there were no politics involved just despair'. This in total contrast with the story told in the BBC witness program that says the Internationale was played and soldiers formed Sovjet like groups. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p051b9xw  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.86.90.39 (talk) 23:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics 

message: I don't think that adding an infobox as this was done the 3 August 2018‎ at 16:43 and 16:46 is pertinent. It provides the reader with no relevant abstract of the article and instead mereley repeats what is written in the first two paragraphs of the header. Other articles about mutinies like here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiel_mutiny and here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89taples_mutiny don't feature any such infobox and I think it makes more sense this way. I'll remove it in a few days unless someone disagrees. Dyadique78 (talk) 20:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the infobox 

message: The French most likely suffered about 187,000 casualties (Nicholson) or perhaps 134,000 (Doughty) and the Germans 163,000 including 28,500 prisoners during the Second Battle of the Aisne. The term 'disastrous' is not correct. However the battle failed to bring a quick end to the war as promised by Nivelle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dyadique78 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing "disastrous" to "unsuccessful and costly" 

message: In the introduction, a 2018 BBC source is cited in support of a statement of 554 death sentences and 26 carried out executions, but in the Repression section quotes research published in 1968 that the respective figure was 629 sentences and 43 executions. Some reconciliation and explanation of the difference ought to be added. Which set of statistics is more trustworthy?Cloptonson (talk) 20:05, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Statistical discrepancy - death sentences and executions

message: If the article says it is not mutiny why not calling the article "1917 French Army desobedience"? 
And saying that officially or usually it is refered incorrectly as mutiny.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EC12:36C0:3D4A:8EAA:4353:F5BA (talk) 09:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Mutiny

message: Homogenised citations but some lack page numbers. Auto ed, cite scan, dupe wl scan. Keith-264 (talk) 18:08, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE
Talk:Miss World 1986

message: I have restored the judges section content (diff). The content is directly relevant, significant and of importance relative to the article's topic, and its omission reduces the quality of the article. Information about the people who judge the performance of a large number of contestants in a contest is highly relevant. Provision of information regarding the judges is credible to provide a balanced overview of the event. It's very likely that offline sources are available that provide coverage. Internet coverage of 1986 events is not plentiful, because the internet was not in widespread usage at this time. Furthermore, I have expanded the Judges section with sourced information. North America1000 23:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judges section restored 