Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rajsingam

message: Statement 
User:Rajsingam has previously acknowledged that User:DoDoBirds was his sock puppet, apologized for violating WP:SOCK and promised he won't use sockpuppets again, so no further action was pursued against him..
Comment
Your statement is something like forcing the Administrators to take action against me. 
Statement
After been quite for a while, last week User:Rajsingam made the following personal attack against User:Netmonger  (with whom he previously had a dispute which led to User:Netmonger to file a Request for Comment against him), and User:DoDoBirds defamed Wikipedia on User talk:Jimbo Wales. Both accounts were subsequently indef blocked.
Comment
You are manipulating and twisting the actual facts, I have claimed already I haven’t posted those messages and appologised for my carelessness. So how can you state that I made the personal attack against Netmonger and Jimbo Wales. Why didn’t you give due weight to my appologisation for Netmonger here(1) and here(2) and for Jimbo Wales here(3) . So it seems the statement is one-sided and manipulated to view things against me.
I never posted those messages. But after I noticed some strange messages using my usernames Rajsingam and DoDoBirds. I surprised what was happening. Though I shared my password with a few of my friends, I never thought that they would be doing those malicious postings. But I couldn’t guess also anything best to my knowledge at that time other than my friends. 
Beacause of that only, I appologized to Netmonger and Jimbo Wales for my carelessness (for sharing the passwords with my friends).
Statement
A new user called User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam then popped up and claimed that he was the owner of the previous two accounts, and that he shared the password for the accounts with User:RaveenS and User:Bakasuprman and one of them misused the account to carry out the personal attacks. 
Comment
I popped up using my real name not with another sock name. I wanted to give more weight over my claims.
I appealed to Administrator: Fayssal what has happened here.
But you are highly manipulating and twisting the statement.
I never posted this message under User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam , but it was posted by an anon user misusing my usernameUser:Rajsingam once the block was lifted on my request.
I tried to open the account User:Rajsingam, but I could’t open it because the password was already altered. I immediatelty forwarded   to Administrator: Fayssal to block the account Rajsingam once again.   
You are purposely failing to bring the actual facts and twisting the story.
Administrator himself asked me to forget about my User:Rajsingam account  and blocked it until I sorted out the password theft.
After I found in the morning my e-mails were already checked by some one else, I informed to others on my User Talk Page:here
But I found the evidence that Netmonger tried to access my e-mail password using Request for Lost Password as I have changed the passwords after the incident and his failed attempt was forwarded by the mail.com with his IP address. Some one else succeeded from another IP address to access my password for the e-mail address rajsingam@mail.com using my profile which was available on the wiki e-mail asiapacifice@yahoo.com which I used for User:Rajsingam. The password of the e-mail asiapacifice@yahoo.com also was altered with the User:Rajsingam subsequently. But as I quickly changed my profile into something else their attempts failed thereafter to access the password of rajsingam@mail.com under Lost Password Request.
I changed my opinion and changed the view that the Netmonger is the one who hacked my initial e-mail password and accessed from there my wiki passwords which I communicated with my friends and posted malicious messages towards him and on Jimbo Wales. 
Statement
He now has suggested that either I or User:Netmonger did it.
Comment
I have suspicion you were trying to hack my password because the evidencehere. But Netmonger tried and the evidences are here.
The one who misused my "Rajsingam" and "DoDoBirds" are actually Netmonger. So I request Checkuser should be used for him also.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 17:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My comment on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rajsingam 

message: I moved this all to the talk page as it has nothing to do with the checkuser procedure and per guidelines, only a brief summery by the user requesting the checkuser is required. --snowolfD4(  talk /  @ ) 17:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NOTE