lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Holy Name Cathedral (Chicago)

message: Thank you for the beautiful article on Holy Name Cathedral.  I especially appreciated the picture of the many suspended galero.  As a side note, the Feast of the Holy Name of Jesus, celebrated during Christmastide (January 1) was also known as the Feast of the Circumcision.  I'm glad (and I am sure the church in Chicago is also) that they chose not to name the church the Cathedral of the Circumcision. --Aloysius Patacsil 21:19, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
::Haha!  I showed your comment to a couple Jesuit priests.  They died laughing.  Glad you liked the article, Aloysius! You should come to Chicago and see the cathedral.  Its magnificent.  --Gerald Farinas 21:31, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the Easter protest be mentioned or is it wrong to give more promotion to such stunts?--T. Anthony (talk) 11:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Catholic Schoolgirls Against the War"? 

message: Wikimedia Commons has some more photos that might help illustrate your article.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Interior_of_Holy_Name_Cathedral_(Chicago)
Nheyob (talk) 14:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: More photos available

message: Is the name Ambo of the Evangelists being used twice in error here? I'm just confused. Cougar Draven (talk) 00:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a question 

message: Greetings, While all the other related WP are Class B, I rated this article with a Class C so that Class C criteria can be evaluated prior to upgrade to class B. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 23:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment, class C explained
Talk:Chengde

message: Chinese city populations are really tough to pin down, I've seen figures anywhere from 300,000 to 4 million for Chengde. If anybody knows a reliable figure, please add.
:Found a figure of 700,000 in a recent edition of Lonely Planet China.  Don't know how accurate this may be, but I'll use it.--Jkiang 08:34, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: I have rewritten this article almost entirely. Chengde itself is not a World Heritage site, only a very small part it is. Thus, the article should be about the whole city, which is actually very large. Besides major expansion of this article, I think the following work needs to be done with Chengde-related pages: 
*Creation of a separate article for the Eight Outer Temples, along with link fix to this template so "its outlying temples" will link there instead of here.
*Some sort of coordination for the temple articles if they each are going to have their own page. Right now only two of the eight temples (Putuo Zongcheng Temple and Puning Temple) have their own articles. Maybe condense them into one, and add information about the other six there?
*Possible renaming of Chengde Mountain Resort to Mountain Resort, Chengde? As far as I know it is not really known by that name outside of Wikipedia. That article also needs major cleanup.
Just some thoughts. shoeofdeath 18:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: The Qing Emperors noted the rising Han population in Chengde so they detached it from Inner Mongolia and attached it to Hebei instead.
http://www.phil-fak.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/chinastudien/papers/No_1998-1.pdf
http://books.google.com/books?id=6qFH-53_VnEC&pg=PA70&dq=1749+mongol+law&hl=en&sa=X&ei=HHkwVJmoF5WwyATosICYDQ&ved=0CD0Q6wEwBA#v=onepage&q=1749%20mongol%20law&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 22:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chengde was detached from Inner Mongolia and Attached to Hebei by the Qing 

message: :The name means "to convey..."
Well, no, placenames aren't infinitives and that's not anything like what 承 means or has meant
:1. https://www.britannica.com/place/Chengde
and it's not anything supported by that source. The actual meaning is something closer to "upholding" or "receiving virtue", with probable reference to the dynasty's obligation to (or gift from) its ancestors.
In any case, the current claim is demonstrably false and demonstrably unsupported by its claimed source, so I'll go ahead and nix it. — LlywelynII 05:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Complex representation

message: Wait a minute! Are you defining a real rep as a rep over a COMPLEX vector space satisfying certain reality conditions and then claiming any rep over COMPLEX vector spaces which is self-dual isn't a complex rep????????
A complex rep is a rep over a complex vector space while a real rep is a rep over a real vector space. It doesn't matter if a complex rep is self-dual. It's still a complex rep and NOT a real rep! Since you're a physicist, take the example of a Dirac spinor. It's a self-dual complex rep of the double cover of the Lorentz group which satisfies your reality conditions. But it's still a complex rep nevertheless. Or how about the Majorana spinor? It's a real rep, and to use your matrix notation in your article on real reps, it doesn't even make sense to talk of antilinear maps over it because a real rep is NOT the same thing as its complexification!!!!!!
Phys 21:58, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait another minute, please. It's only a confusion of language. If one hears of a "real representation", one should have in mind that it might be a rep living on a real vector space but also a rep being defined on a complex space and having a real structure (i.e. there is an anti(!)linear mapping whose square equals the identity map). Personally, for the latter I prefer the term "complex rep of real type". --Stefan Neumeier (talk) 23:02, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Antifundamental representation

message: first of all, fundamental representations, according to the definition you gave in the article are highly nonunique. Secondly, fundamental representations are not non self-dual in general. Thirdly, the term "fundamental rep" as it's used by physicists seems to me to boil down to: for each specific simple Lie algebra, let's pick by an arbitrary convention (which is agreed upon by all physicists) a particular irrep and call it the fundamental rep. Phys 22:06, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: issues
Talk:Clonazepam

message: In 2011, this page was edited to note that clonazepam is metabolized by CYP2C19 as well as by CYP3A4. However, I've been unable to find any reliable non-Wikipedia sources for the claim that clonazepam is a CYP2C19 substrate. Conversely, several sources claim that clonazepam is primarily/exclusively a 3A4 substrate (Medscape, Drugbank), or that it is not affected by 2C19 inhibitors (Drugs.com).
The closest I've been able to find is an article in IJPBS called Genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 in a sample of Iraqi population. However, this article was published in 2015 (long after this edit), and the journal does not seem particularly reputable. Further, the article's source for this claim is a 2001 article called Clinical relevance of genetic polymorphisms in the human CYP2C subfamily in BJCP, which does *not* list clonazepam as one of the CYP2C19-metabolized drugs. In other words, the authors might have been referring to Wikipedia when they wrote this sentence.
Does anyone have a good source for the existence of this metabolic pathway, that was clearly published _before_ Wikipedia was edited? If not, I think we should remove this claim.  SashaMarievskaya (talk) 00:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Added ref to one Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  CYP2C19 

message: We say that it is used to treat seizures and panic disorder and movement disorders thus this "Clonazepam has anticonvulsant, anxiolytic, and muscle relaxant properties.http://www.mental-health-today.com/rx/benzo.htmhttp://www.bcnc.org.uk/equivalence.html Benzo Equivalency Table| link= https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2172250-overview#a1" is not really needed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:38, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Repetition

message: I think it would be helpful to add off-label use of clonazepam in chronic pain (neuroplastic pain) syndromes. It has some robust analgetic properties when used acutely in atypical facial pain, fibromyalgia, TMD and simillar disorders of central senzitization. Šaholjubac (talk) 22:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronic pain
Talk:Middelburg

message: This disambiguation page was originally located at Middelburg. I've moved it to Middelburg (disambiguation), and
made Middelburg into a redirect to Middelburg, Netherlands.
There were at the time of this move (excepting links from the disambiguation page):
* 4 links to Middelburg, Netherlands
* 1 link to Middelburg, Belgium
* 1 link to Middelburg, South-Africa
* about 30 links to the disambiguation page, all about Middelburg, the Netherlands
Eugene van der Pijll 22:48, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kshatriya

message: Hey editor! Just wanted to see if you can change the photo of this page to a more of an actual Indian Warrior instead of a cartoon. It would be much appreciated as people would be able to understand the significance of kshatriyas better with an actual decent photograph. Jai Hind Dharmsanrakshak (talk) 13:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Recoil (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

text: change cover page picture from cartoon to actual indian kshatriya 132.147.113.197 (talk) 10:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 October 2022 

message: Sanatan dharm 103.206.177.82 (talk) 09:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kshatriya does not mean king, Kshatriya is a religious caste. Everyone can become a king! That's why don't associate Kshatriya jati with the word Rajanya 

message: Early Rigvedic tribal monarchy section:
“The administrative machinery in the Vedic India was headed by a tribal king called Rajan whose position may or may not have been hereditary.”
In my opinion “tribal king called Rajan” makes it sound as though it was simply one guy named Rajan, not a title. I suggest this be changed to:
“tribal king called a Rajan” or “tribal king called the Rajan”.
Thank you 2A00:23C6:95CE:B401:609A:DB6:DAB2:FDEC (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 01:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 November 2023 

message: * 
Reason: As vandalism has been stopped, the page no longer requires protection. Nevertheless, it lacks enough information and facts about Kshatriyas. At present, there is a scarcity of content on this subject. Removing the page protection would allow editors to add more useful information. Alex Cupper (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Page protection
Talk:USS Chandler (DD-206)

message: This article has a link to I-185, which is a dis-ambiguation page with 2 choices, both of which are interstate highways, but the link doesn't look like an Interstate. Can anyone put the third choice for the dis-ambiguation page I-185?? 66.245.94.89 23:31, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I recast  as text, removing the link to the disambiguation page. No point in a link to a disambiguation page, but it would be excellent if some expert ship editor could create the Japanese submarine article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:18, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: I-185
Talk:The Last Poets

message: Hows about something on the connection between Last poets and Gil Scott Heron? I used to have an album called At last by the Last Poets that included  a track called 'Niggers Are Scared of Revolution' which was I thought very much a precursor of "The Revolution Will Not B Televised". Can anybody develop this theme further?? quercus robur 00:09, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scott-Heron 

message: Dahveed Nelson appears to be performing with The Last Poets once again. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dahveed Nelson
Talk:Nassau

message: The descriptions (and a couple red-links) could use some help from someone knowledgable about the history of Germany, Netherlands, and/or Prussia (esp 17th century). Niteowlneils 00:21, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: So that Nassau, Bahamas, can be moved here: the capital city of a present-day independent nation should get primary topic disambiguation. Please discuss on Talk:Nassau, Bahamas. –Hajor 01:18, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: well one is (indirectly) named after the other one. The German Nassau is the original one. and btw i think many people don't know any of them178.210.114.106 (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Shouldn't the most populous or most significant places named Nassau be given priority or highlighting near the top of the list?  If I read an article about a place named Nassau but didn't know which one it might be referring to, and looked up "Nassau" on Wikipedia, this list is currently entirely unhelpful.  It's great that all of them are named after Nassau, Germany, but it's population is not even 5000.  -- Renesis (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: but since it is the original Nassau it can be argued that it is the most significant/important one.178.210.114.106 (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: and ordering them by their population does not seem that helpful either178.210.114.106 (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Placename list order
Talk:Sokolsky Opening

message: In the VfD on A00 Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 e5, it was decided to merge anything useful here.  I don't see anything useful; there's no actual explanation, and no citation.  But you're invited to check out this old version to see for yourself.  dbenbenn | talk 14:19, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[A00 Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 e5]] 

message: We have this in the article:
:Of the twenty possible first moves from White, 1.b4 ranks ninth in popularity.
We really ought to give a source for this (and if it is determined from a database, we need to state which database), since I would expect the popularity to vary quite a bit according to what game-set you looked at (only GM games, only postal games, a general database including everything, or whatever). For example, looking at games played this year and published in The Week in Chess, I find 1.b4 is indeed the 9th most popular move, but for games dated 1990 in Tim Harding's MegaCorr database, it is 5th. So where does this info come from? (If nobody can say, I can analyse games in a Chessbase Mega database or something, but I'd rather not because 1) I'm lazy, and 2) it would tie up my computer for some time.) --Camembert
----
Good points.  In addition to seeing differences in over-the-board and correspondence, the age of the games will make a difference in the popularity of the openings.  Sometimes it can make a huge difference, as some openings have brief revivals (usually because they are used a few times by a well-known GM like Kasparov) and then slip back into disuse.  Depending on whether these brief periods of popularity are included or not can skew the numbers.  Actually it would be interesting to see opening popularity numbers broken down by era: Romantic, Classical, Hypermodern, and current (which might be Postmodern, I guess).  This would be too much to put into every article on an individual opening, but it would make an interesting chess history article on its own.  Raymond Keene recently published a book on chess opening history, but I have not seen it.
----
The sources I have used are www.chesslive.de and www.chessgames.com which both place 1.b4 in ninth place. The first of the databases has master games overrepresented, but there are quite a few amateur games among them. (When I started seeing some of my games in the database I was conviced that this is not an all master database.) The second databse has fewer games, and presents games among stronger players. On some of the first move articles, I have mentioned that the popularity ranking is according to ChessBase (the first database), so I can add that source to some of these articles. Sjakkalle 06:14, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity ranking
Talk:Light-dependent reaction

message: destiny
:Yes. :) Bryan 04:56, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For some reason, the photophosphorylation article is re-directed into Light-dependent reaction article. The two, in my opinion are not the same and therefore shouldn't be linked. The former is more tightly related to plants, while the later can in fact be applied even to photovoltaic cells (solar cells)
: It would be a good idea to expand the Light-dependent reaction article to include non-biological examples of this, but keep the redirect (as otherwise it would just be duplication of content). Or perhaps it would be better to turn the light-dependent reaction page into a disambiguation page. Thoughts? Talrias 10:35, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
::Photovoltaic cells do not phosphorylate anything.  There's more to the light reactions than photophosphorylation, but the redirect seems appropriate to me.  dsws 02:27, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  photophosphorylation = Light-dependent reaction? 

message: curious as to why it says "SENS RULE!!" after number 7 in the steps section... it could be vandalism considering i've never heard of any such thing and i doubt it has anything to do with the calvin-benson cycle.Annie 02:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Step 7

message: I think this discription contains a mistake stating: "passes from the primary acceptor to ferredoxin, then to a complex of two cytochromes (similar to those found in mitochondria), and then to plastoquinone before returning to chlorophyll". It is supposed to be plastocyanin that carries the electrons back to the PS1, isn't it?
:jeah, you are totally right. Ferredoxin can't gives electons to cytochrome b6f. I fixed it. (Kasper90 (talk) 01:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cyclic photophosphorylation

message: }
Substituted at 22:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment
Talk:Tetraodontiformes

message: True or false: this term comes from Greek tetra- meaning 4. 66.245.94.89 01:03, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the entire word would mean "four toothed shapes", the odous being Greek for "tooth" and forma being Latin for "shape". This is an allusion to the structure of the puffers' beak-like jaws, which are actually modified jawbones and not teeth. There are visible sutures which divide the beaks into "teeth", and counting these is a way of distinguishing the families. For example the porcupinefish (Diodontidae, "two-toothed") and three-toothed puffers (Triodontidae). I think I'll add that to the article. -- Hadal 02:39, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: I did a major rewriting and expansion of the article the other day. I hope it's more illuminating, now. -- Hadal 04:26, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Spinor

message: I find that there are a very, very large number of words that one must read through before getting to the definition of what a spinor is.
But then, when we finally arrive at the "formal mathematical definition", we are told that the "space of spinors" is the "fundamental representation of the Clifford algebra".
Which Clifford algebra? We are not told. And What is a spinor? We are still not told. 
This is exasperating to anyone trying to understand what "a spinor" means. 2601:200:C000:1A0:BD2E:1150:73B7:AF9B (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The above comment is correct and still applicable in 2024. Jess_Riedel (talk) 22:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added a See also link to spinors in three dimensions just below the formal mathematical definition section. This other article has an easy to follow explanation of what a spinor is. I hope that helps. Schweinchen (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with article 

message: I have made this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spinor&type=revision&diff=1112165710&oldid=1102973222 edit. I think I have not made any mistake in doing so, but if I have, then please correct it. But please do not undo my edit without considering the following.
The reason for my edit is that the current version of the article uses three different font formats, and this makes it hard for the reader, even if it makes it easier for the editor. I submit that ease for the reader should be decisive. Please consider this carefully.
A maxim here is 'every second that a writer saves in short-cut writing costs the reader five minutes to work out the proper reading'.
The font consistency work that I have started in that edit should be progressed throughout the article.Chjoaygame (talk) 00:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  consistency of font 

message: Hello,  Would it be appropriate to include a section on spinor classification in this article?  An alternative approach would be to have a separate article on spinor classification as this article is a lengthy article.  I could write the section or article if needed.TMM53 (talk) 03:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spinor classification
Talk:County of Savoy

message: This article need not deal with the genealogical details of the counts. It is just a brief stub. Wetman 04:20, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I recommend that this article and article title be deleted from Wikipedia. The contents are redundant information that can be found elsewhere in Wikipedia, including articles entitled: House of Savoy and Duchy of Savoy. The Italian names for the rulers are especially pointless because they are not used in histories written in English (and they spoke French, not Italian). (If necessary, this article could be redirected to House of Savoy Charvex 08:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Mitsuo Matayoshi

message: On 1 Aug 2004, this article was nominated for deletion.  The consensus was to keep the article.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Matayoshi Jesus for a record of the discussion.  Rossami 04:23, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: deletion

message: "Jesus" is better than "Iesu", since this is the English version.  The article should be moved to "Matayoshi Jesus".61.46.253.55 09:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Matayoshi Jesus" is better 

message: * Oppose proposed move; suggest Move to Mitsuo Matayoshi instead.  See below. Neier 06:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose move 