Talk:Norway–European Union relations

message: Are there any opinion polls on EU membership in Norway that could be mentioned here? (58.188.97.134 07:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Opinion polls are publicized regularly. Around 2001-2003, as Norway was going through a minor economical crisis (along with the rest of world) and the EU was expanding to include Eastern European countries, the polls were in favour of joining the EU. However, as the political problems within the EU increased and Norway regained its economical strength, the polls have suggested around 60% against and 40% in favour of joining. As long as Norway keeps doing well economically, large parts of the population will probably be uninterested in joining.
There haven't been any opinion polls added since July, but they seemed pretty regular up to that point. Anyone know where to find them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.50.240 (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion polls? 

message: I'm sorry but since when is this the case? this country is heavily reliant on foreign food imports ever since the 19th century. 84.90.16.244 (talk) 17:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually Norway is currently almost self sufficient with grain for instance. Inge (talk) 06:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ref: Article from the governmentInge (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  argument against: end of self-sufficiency in food 

message: I believe the arguments section is tilted towards a positive conclution on membership. The positive arguments are more numerous and better composed. The negative arguments even contain counter arguments and are riddled with cite tags. The section could as it stands do with an NPOV tag.Inge (talk) 08:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arguments 

message: "To avoid a new debate on EU, anti-EU parties usually require "suicide paragraphs" in government-coalition agreements: if some party in the coalition officially begins a new debate on EU, the government will fall."
Can somebody clarify this? Is a 'suicide paragraph' the same as a sunset provision? The government falling due to debate on the EU, I don't understand that at all. 74.78.98.109 (talk) 00:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarification? 

message: I've added an out of date tag to the History section because it still uses the 2005 payment to the EU. -Rrius (talk) 01:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 

message: "Agriculture and fisheries
In case of EU membership, Norway would have to take part in the Common Fisheries Policy. Norwegian fishing quotas would have to be shared with the rest of the EU.[citation needed] Some claim the coastal areas of Norway, which rely heavily on fishing industry, would suffer from a reduced share of the catch.[citation needed]
The often steep Norwegian topography is unfavourable for agriculture. Some fear that Norway's relatively small farming industry would be disadvantageously exposed to competition from other parts of the Internal Market. Some fear state subsidies to Norwegian farming and fisheries would be made illegal, furthermore depopulating rural areas.[citation needed]"
That's what the article is saying right now.
I don't have any actual sitations that can be used.
But if you check the statistics for the fishery in Norwegian terretorial waters and the one for the EU one I would be supriced if it didn't show a difference in productivety.
It is a subjective feeling of mine thou.
(no I'm not the orginator of that part of the article)
So I'm wondering do any of you know of any EU numbers regarding fishery?
Preferably some that don't include the fish fished by spanish boats outside the african coast.
It would need to be some sort of numbers that compare the output of a set amount of sea as the territorial waters of Norway and the EU differs in size.
I'll see if I can find something similar for Norwegian outputs.
Luredreier 01:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sitation needed regarding fishery 

message: This section has had the "sources needed" tag for more than a year.  If there is noone against, I will clean it up and will removed all unsourced materials. Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 06:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arguments 

message: Since the Labour Party lost its dominance in Norwegian politics, all governments have been a coalition of several political parties. When did the loss of dominance occure? The labour party has 35,4% of the wotes (2009), only with one exception the party got between 30 and 50% in all elections from 1927-2009, since 1990 the party has formed a minority government with a lower outcome than in 2009 twice. If you look at the parliamentary situation, the labour party could have formed a minority government and cooperate with the conservatives on EU (if they wanted to). The case is rather that parties choose parliamentary controle before EU-debate than a parliamentary situation making EU-debate impossible. --Tordenskrall (talk) 23:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labour Party 

message: How does the (possible) icelandic EU membership influence the EU Debate in Norway? ASAIS isn't that topic mentioned in the article. --134.176.205.173 (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iceland 

message: Shouldn't it be titled 'Norway–European Union relations'? The two parts of the compound modifier are of equal importance to the relations; the relations are between Norway and the EU. 86.15.57.23 (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spaced en dash? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Georgia (country)–European Union relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 06:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Georgia–European Union relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 09:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Any else think that there should be an article titled "Accession of Norway to the European Union", I know, they might not be intrested right now, but neither is Iceland. Charles Essie (talk) 17:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article? 

message: In the southernmost tip of Argentina the Argentine province of Tierra del Fuego is painted in orange, as if it were a British territory and therefore part of the EU. That's absolutely wrong. The Malvinas Islands/Falkland Islands and British Antarctica are the lands the UK administers, but Tierra del Fuego is an integral part of Argentina and it has nothing to do with the UK or the EU.--Luuchoo93 (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, and I added Greenland and Canary Island to the EU also.--BIL (talk) 12:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for removing Tierra del Fuego, but Greenland isn't part of the EU.  Only Outermost regions are part of the EU.  TDL (talk) 17:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Then British and French Antarctica and Falkland islands should be removed. Probably Norwegian Antarctica also, since it is not part of Norway, only a Norwegian possession.--BIL (talk) 22:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  TDL (talk) 23:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map is wrong 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Norway–European Union relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110724183817/http://riks24.no/index.php/bruker/Innenriks/Nei-flertall-i-fire-aar to http://riks24.no/index.php/bruker/Innenriks/Nei-flertall-i-fire-aar
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Norway–European Union relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090307210119/http://www.sitecenter.dk:80/henrik2405hj/stortnejinorge/ to http://www.sitecenter.dk/henrik2405hj/stortnejinorge/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110519215605/http://politisk.tv2.no:80/nyheter/sju-av-ti-sier-nei-til-eu/ to http://politisk.tv2.no/nyheter/sju-av-ti-sier-nei-til-eu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Norway–European Union relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927091900/http://www.hoyre.no/temaer/europa_og_eu to http://www.hoyre.no/temaer/europa_og_eu
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070303191032/http://www.krf.no:80/portal/page?_pageid=33,202561&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&element_id=828651 to http://www.krf.no/portal/page?_pageid=33,202561&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&element_id=828651
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927212757/http://www.sv.no/politikken/eu/ to http://www.sv.no/politikken/eu/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307210119/http://www.sitecenter.dk/henrik2405hj/stortnejinorge/ to http://www.sitecenter.dk/henrik2405hj/stortnejinorge/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724183817/http://riks24.no/index.php/bruker/Innenriks/Nei-flertall-i-fire-aar to http://riks24.no/index.php/bruker/Innenriks/Nei-flertall-i-fire-aar
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519215605/http://politisk.tv2.no/nyheter/sju-av-ti-sier-nei-til-eu/ to http://politisk.tv2.no/nyheter/sju-av-ti-sier-nei-til-eu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:48, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: European Union Customs Union states that Norway is not a member. I feel that it would be helpful if either this article, that article or some other article gave details of the extent to which this leaves Norway free to negotiate its own customs arrangements, especially in light of (1) its membership of the Single Market and (2) the (unsourced) statement that "Free movement of goods means freedom from customs fees, where however food and beverage is excluded (because those are subsidised by the EU)." There is some information at Norway%E2%80%93Sweden_border#Control. This is of course topical in light of the debate over the form which Brexit may take. 
Thoughts?
Alekksandr (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Norwegian customs arrangements