lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares

message: I've just been watching the Region 0 (yes, I mean 0, not 4) DVDs released in Australia and noticed some things that are inconsistent with the episode list:
* Series 1 - All episodes are revisit episodes and the DVD is labelled "Series 1 Revisit"
* Series 2 - Because episodes 5-8 duplicate series 1, the second DVD in series 2 contains the series 3 episodes.
* Series 3 is actually episodes 1-4 from series 4.
* Series 4 -  DVD 1 contains episodes 1, 2 & 5 from series 5. DVD 2 contains episodes 6, 7 & 8 from series 5.
This seems strange, but worth noting in the event that there is any strange re-ordering of episodes in the article. --AussieLegend (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is odd.  We had a similar issue arise a while back, when some episodes were broadcast in a different order in the UK than in the US.  --Drmargi (talk) 19:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD episode order 

message: (redacted edit by site banned editor's sock puppet)
:Disagree : Per the copious amounts of discussion in the archives. DP76764 (Talk) 05:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2013
Category talk:Anti-war novels

message: should be added:
catch-22
slaughter-house-five
all quiet on the western front
and others i can't think of
________________________________
A Farewell to Arms, 
Mother Night
I just added all except Catch-22 and Mother Night because I have not read them and their articles say nothing about being anti-war. --Iamunknown 05:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions
Talk:Iris Adrian

message: Remove bisexual cat tag, no article ref to support, could find none per google. FloNight talk  01:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed bisexual cat

message: As per Wikipedia is not a collection of lists, I have reduced the "Filmography" section to just the films that have Wiki articles, and renamed it to "Selected filmography" ... people can click the IMDb External link at the end of the article to see the subject's full filmography with links to information about each of their films.
I have also used 19xx tags for the years of the films, something that Some Other Editors do not appear to understand, since they seem to think that just linking 19xx somehow has encyclopedic value.
Anonymous edits without comments may be reverted by anyone.
I am placing this boilerplate message on this Discussion page before I actually make the changes, so that I can just put "see Discussion page" in the edit summary, and hopefully not have my edit summarily reverted as vandalism by Some Other Editor.
Happy Editing! -- 11:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After posting the above, I decided to simply revert the addition of the list with an UNDO. —68.239.79.82 11:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected filmography
Talk:Sustainable habitat

message: Sorry, Sanman_nor. I don't think this page makes the grade for wikipedia inclusion, we are very strong on establishing notability and at present the New Shire Institute, is just a bit too new. Maybe when the institute has established a track record then it might be worthy of a page. I wish you well in your endevors and would be glad to hear from you in future. If you want to expand this page so it really expands on the meaning of a sustainable habitat then that would be a great addition to wikipedia. There is a lot of interesting stuff which could be said. Yours --Salix alba (talk) 01:14, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Ahaffa (talk) 17:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Environmental Chemistry
Talk:Malaysia Liquified Natural Gas Corporation

message: I'm not familiar with Malaysian industry, so I'm reading this article as a lay person.  I'm not sure exactly how Malaysia LNG Corp fits with the other acronyms.  Are MLNG 1,2, and 3 three separate companies collectively known as Malaysian LNG Corporation, or are they plants or sub-complexes that belong to the Corporation?  -Zeroend 01:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like they're just plants. I also suspect the article is a copyvio. No objections to the merge tag so I'm going to do it. --Canley 10:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Phycobilisome

message: Message to Rhobite: if you have to keep deleting my images, please delete the link to those images. Thank you. --Miller 01:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I think the Phycobilisome should remain an independent page, with links to Photosynthesis.  Their role in the evolution of photosynthesis, and their biochemistry will grow in much detail in the next decade.  Jim Johnson, FSU, Tallahassee, FL, USA —Preceding unsigned comment added by  70.41.80.68  (talk • contribs) 
Such a merge seems inappropriate.  Photosynthesis must be an overview of the whole process.  This component deserves its own article. -R. S. Shaw 21:10, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with photosynthesis
Talk:El Tiradito

message: Perhaps someone in the Tucson area could obtain a decent quality photograph of this to post to the page, instead of merely providing a link? Dr. Cash 01:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope so!  I'd love for this page to get lots of local input. Archivizt 01:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GFDL Photo

message: I lived in Tucson for several years, and this is one of my favorite sites.  I recall the Weekly had a write up on it once in 1999 or 2000.  This write up included several interesting facts, an English translation of the name, and the story of the site.  If someone in the Tucson area could find this source, that would be great.  As I recall, The name means "little castaway," it is the location of the finding of a jilted lovers remains after his having been rather brutally murdered and disassembled, and it is the only "sinner's shrine" in North America.  This last piece of information is most interesting.  If I have a nopportunity to look for sources, I will.--Smallwhitelight 18:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info, please 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20140811133420/http://www.tucsonmuseum.org/shrinecurse.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Wikipedia talk:Censorship/Shock images

message: Obvious difference is that the goatse image elicits a visceral reaction, where as the editorial cartoons do not. While people may be offended or shocked by the mere sight of goatse, people instead are offended not by the mere sight of the cartoon itself but by the author and publisher(s) of the cartoons and the offensive messages presented. Simply classing both cases as "offensive" (and therefore requring the same action) is overly simple. The two cases have been handled separately for a good reason. —Pengo 02:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree with this argument. For at least some fundamentalists, the cartoons are offensive simply by the fact that they depict Muhammad, regardless of the message of the cartoons. In many ways, the visceral reaction to Goatse is itself a function of culture - some people or societies aren't affected by it. I don't think the distinction is at all clear.--Fangz 02:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, visceralness is too subjective as a measure. It can easily be abused to delete things that should not be - e.g. quoted profanity etc, that most people appear to be happy with including.--Fangz 03:58, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference is that fundamentalists choose to be offended by the Mohammed cartoons, whereas most people do not even have the capability to choose not to be disgusted by the distended anus.  There's a big difference between choosing to be offended because of religious sensibilities and being disgusted because of visceral imagery.  --Cyde Weys 08:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

text: It would be more helpful to outline what the important differences are, and so how we can apply this in a rule on when removing offensive content is OK.--Fangz 03:58, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Why not discuss this at Wikipedia talk:Censorship? It's very early to be splitting the policy up. Gerard Foley 04:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a contradiction? 

message: # WAS 4.250 01:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Use < followed by "strike" without quote marks and > to start a strikethrough, then end it with < then / then "strike" without quotes then >. Homestarmy 14:28, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk some more. This vote is premature.

message: Speedy delete This poll, come on now, we've gone over this too much. Homestarmy 01:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Abstain I belive both images should be possible to reach from Wikipedia, but that people not should exposed to them against their will, if they just want to read about the case. Bertilvidet 12:56, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abstain from voting
Talk:Highlands Hammock State Park

message: This entire article does not have one single reference, but it is absolutely ok for Wikipedia.
For other articles however, curiously enough, when someone contributes something, even a short addition to a particular section of other existing articles, Wikipedia illuminati delete it straightaway without any consideration.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.1.78 (talk) 13:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Sentence spacing

message: It's to prevent confusion with internal abbreviations where the dot is to be followed by a single space, for example "Mr." or "Dr.", especially because those very common abbreviations are almost always followed by a capital letter.  This confusion is mentioned in the section on how computers deal with the distinction but should also be featured in the "Controversy" and "Effects on Readability and Legibility" sections.  68.196.3.202 (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Reason Commonly Given for Double Spacing Is Not Mentioned 

message: The "en space" or "en quad" is in my recollection the standard word space, and the "em space" or "em quad" is the typical sentence space, which is backwards from the page text. Can someone corroborate or rebut this? 41.80.175.9 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  questioning the correctness of the "en quad" being the standard sentence space  

message: A few sentences are not sourced. And the "Controversy" section may be removed and its content moved elsewhere? A455bcd9 (talk) 11:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:URFA/2020]]
Talk:Evil scientist

message: Why the redirect?  There is a definite distinction between mad scientists and evil ones (a subset of evil geniuses) in the genre.  IIRC I hadn't got around to creating this page after I introduced the corresponding :Category:Evil scientists but this page was going to be a list of them.  Actually I had thought I did create this page but clearly it doesn't show up in the history.  --David.alex.lamb 01:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of radio stations in Florida

message: Where is the Melbourne market?cmulgrew 05:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be listed under Orlando (i.e. Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne), but that might be a television market definition and not radio.  Good question. -- SwissCelt 18:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This list was in extremely poor condition. I have reordered the markets by market size, named them as per the Arbitron definitions, and added spaces for all of the markets. The list is quite incomplete, and there is a lack of consistency in how the stations are listed. I'm not going to try and tackle the whole thing by myself, although I will take care of the Gainesville/Ocala stations soon.
As a side note, the templates for the markets are poorly named. I am going to look into getting the current ones renamed (as per the Arbitron defs) or create new ones and merge the old data into the new templates. The five largest markets are broken into separate AM and FM templates, while the rest are lumped together in one. I'm not sure of the rationale behind that decision when the templates were created, but I'd like to see about creating separate templates for each.
Horologium talk - contrib 20:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rework

message: How will this list deal with stations that stop broadcasting over radio waves? WLOQ in Winter Park, FL stopped broadcasting on traditional radio, but will still have a presence online. I tuned in to 103.1 FM, their former frequency, and heard 4 Elvis Presley songs in a row! I can't find anything online about this change (except on Facebook), but they don't say who will take over the radio frequency. Babowman (talk) 03:17, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station to stop broadcasting over radio waves 
Talk:Florida scrub jay

message: Lyonia preserve has many scrub jay counts, and is an active part of their restoration process.  Where is the mention of their work.
24.233.132.198 (talk) 19:58, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. "Florida" cat was rm, put it back in. Dysmorodrepanis 16:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyonia Preserve
Talk:Coat of arms of Cher

message: Why does this page show a different coat of arms from that of the department page? Green Giant 02:17, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Image:Blason18.PNG depicts the coat of arms of the city of Bourges, which is the capital of the department. So this image should be replaced by a correct one. --Ludger1961 23:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For one brief but weird moment, I thought this was about Cher from Sonny and Cher......A2Kafir 01:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: -) That's funny! Arms Jones (talk) 09:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whew!
Talk:Maarja-Liis Ilus

message: Does anyone know the exact relationship between the two releases? My impression is that First in Line was released first internationally (at least on the Asian market) and then back home in Estonia. Was Kaua Veel, for all purposes the Estonian-language version of First in Line, ever released outside of Estonia? Which album came first? I would guess First in Line, but I don't have any sources, and I cannot read Estonian, so I can't decipher most of the info on Maarja on the net. --Iceager 02:18, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''First in Line'' and ''Kaua Veel'' 

message: It is no longer possible to comment on ratings due to a backlog. Comments/questions on my talk page. GDon4t0 23:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPBio Rating
Talk:Wainfleet, Ontario

message: I'm interesting in starting an indepth article about Wainfleet, I'll start soon if anyone else is interested.  I wanna look into geography/economy of this small town, and maybe do a few other small towns as well.  I just think it'd be good practice for me making articles, I could learn format n whatnot...  any advice please let me knowCheevz 02:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wondering if there was a school there. I have an antique sampler from someone named Charlotte Benson 2603:7081:338:2718:6914:8CA3:52EC:D8E1 (talk) 18:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sampler from Wainfleet School.
Talk:Chesterland, Ohio

message: Chesterland is the hometown of progressive metal group Omerta. Members include Joey Ariemma, Steven Eler, Tommy Kooser, and Ben Scott.
Chesterland is the home to another progressive metal band called Particles Of Experience. Its members include Daniel McDonnell, Peter Boyle, Nicholas Simoni and Mathew Reinert. The two bands collaborate and can often be seen "shredding".
Discussion:
Moved these lines from the main article for discussion on their notability.  Should provide some proof as to why they should be included in the article.  Even if they were to be included, it would seem more appropriate to include them in a lesser subsection
--KeithB 19:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable notability of bands listed in article 
Talk:59th Street-Columbus Circle (IRT Broadway-Seventh Avenue Line)

message: I replaced the navbox because it is a standard part of most of the NYC subway articles; it also provides many valuable links to other subway-related articles that someone otherwise might have to dig through many other articles to find. It might look a little unwieldy here, in the context of such a small article, but it certainly doesn't in such articles as 42nd Street-Times Square, and why should those articles get the navbox and not others? Also, those extra lines of white space around  are necessary, or else the stub notice will be placed directly after the final text in the article, which makes it a little difficult to make out and is unaesthetic to boot. —Larry V (talk) 02:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert on 21 Feb 2006
Talk:Chain (disambiguation)

message: IMHO, this is not a disambiguation page; it is the start of a maze. I was looking for encyclopaedic info on chain (the stuff at hardware stores). See my comments here. A link (as opposed to a link or a link) to the stuff that holds up anchors would we VERY welcome. Kevin/Last1in 02:47, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unititled section
Talk:Poker on television

message: Should someone add the Heartland Poker Tour to this page? www.heartlandpokertour.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.54.59 (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: The lead paragraph currently reads:
Poker television programs had been extremely popular, especially in North America and Europe, following the poker boom. However, viewership has been declining dramatically in recent years. This has especially become the case since the invention of the "pocket cam" in 1997 (and its first use in the United States in 2002), which allows viewers at home to see each player's hole cards.
This implies that the introduction of the pocket/hole cam was responsible for a decline in poker TV viewerships. Is that really the case? I suspect the second and third sentences should be swapped.
Also, it might be useful to add a format column (tournament/cash game/game show, etc.) to the lists of programs. The European table should probably have a language and/or country column as well. 93.216.79.4 (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the pocket/hole cam lead to a decline in viewship?
Talk:Sarah Mellon

message: I changed the comments about Newsmax from "a rabid, right wing fringe web site" or some such to the first two lines from the actual Newsmax page: "a conservative news website that ...[runs from] West Palm Beach, Florida."
Rabid fringe web site? What were you thinking?
MKFreeberg 02:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Despite including sections titled "Early Life" and "Personal Life", this article has no information about this who this person was -- ancestry, progeny, assets, etc., yes -- even who sold off her effects! -- but what did she do with her life? ManlyMatt (talk) 11:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who?
Talk:Conklin Shows

message: Tlryan (talk) 22:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said earlier it is nothing personal. In my opinion this company is not notable, but I may be wrong, so I nominated this page for AfD. This does not mean that article WILL be deleted. Nomination means that people will now vote whether this article should be deleted or not (current votes suggest that it will be kept). Article for Deletion block in the head of an article only informs users, about a fact that this article is nominated (this is standard procedure) and NOTHING more. Therefore your removals of AfD tags only shows your incompetence in Wikipedia. eLNuko 06:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm sure it is significant to you or a lot more of people. This nomination IS NOT AN IMMINENT DELETION!!! This is only referendum for Wikipedians - does this article belongs here. So please before you do something - read about articles for deletion and DO NOT interfere with common process. Your actions can be considered as repeating vandalism. eLNuko 07:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I heard once that the Conklin family is Aboriginal and that Conklin Games is one of the largest, if not the largest, Native-run business in North America. Is this true? Is so it would be a good thing to add to the article. Reggie Perrin (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native link? 
Talk:South Dakota v. Dole

message: The construction Congress's should be preferred over Congress'. When Googling the former, the first hit is the Washington Post, an authority if there ever was one on Congress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.140.214.254 (talk) 02:56, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds reasonable. bd2412 T 04:44, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congress' vs. Congress's 

message: Some Citation Needed tags in the relevant sections are needed to clarify the banner.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.213.86.164 (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: The article as-is cites the amount to be withheld as 5% of highway funding.  However, a hidden comment in the page code references the 10% figure.  The actual directive was to withhold 5% the first year of noncompliance, and then 10% per year thereafter.  Any reason for the 10% figure to be hidden?  Thoughts on including the full 5%/10% info in the article, or is that getting too far off topic?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.143.40 (talk) 20:06, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Great catch! Edit made. - Walkiped (T | C) 18:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funding Percentage 

message: The article cites the Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, however it links to the Twenty-First Amendment. Is it possible that the references to the Twenty-Eight are actually meant to be references to the Twenty-First. As far as I know, there is no Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution presently. Uvula (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twenty-Eighth Amendment?
Talk:Marquette University High School

message: The entire History section and much of the Students section seems to have been lifted from the HS website.  Please rewrite them. /blahedo (t) 02:56, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: MUHS is run by Jesuits and isn't affiliated with the Archdiocese of Milwaukee whatsoever.
The above statement is kind of misleading.  The jesuits are only allowed to operate in Milwaukee because the archdiocese allows them to be there...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.20.17 (talk) 22:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: School Isn't Part of the Archdiocese