lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of defunct English football stadiums

message: I'm not sure what this list is aiming to be. It would probably be better dealt with on individual club pages. If not it needs to be more clearly defined. e.g. How far back does the list go?  How high in the football pyramid does a club have to be before inclusion?  What is the difference between defunct stadia and redeveloped stadia (e.g. Bournemouth in the list)? Nuttah68 21:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason I created it was that the List of English football stadia by capacity, which included these, was too long. It certainly needs expanding and a bit of work on it at the moment though; I baisically copied it from the other page. Put simply, a defunct stadium is one that has been completely demolished and is no longer used. Wembley and Bournemouth are here because, although built on the same land, the stadia are compeltely new.--Robdurbar 07:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The trouble with redeveloped grounds is that none of the original ground survives at Charlton, Manchester United and Tottenham (and probably many more). Does Old Trafford belong on this list? Nuttah68 08:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: No, the grounds have been totally redeveloped. The Valley was the largest ground in English football. Half of the site of the original stadium is now a supermarket. Nuttah68 08:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: By this logic, most grounds that have been around for at least 40/50 years should be included!  What happens when Fratton Park is redeveloped so that it is turned through 90o?  What about Deepdale, when the redevelopment of each side is completed? Or St Andrews?  I will talk about Bramall Lane, as I know it well.  I 1967, the Bramall Lane Stand was knocked down and rebuilt.  The South stand was build in 1975, the Kop demolished and rebuilt in the 80's and the John Street Stand demolished in 1994 and rebuilt in 1996.  Three corners have no been filled in, two with seating and one with a business centre.  Is Bramall Lane prior to 1967 now ready for inclusion on this list?  L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 14:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As far as I'm concerned, anyone who's been in the football league or conference at any time is fair game for this list; in addition, any stadia that have been used by England naitonal teams. --Robdurbar 07:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria
Talk:Eastbourne railway station

message: Would it make sense for Hampden Park to be listed as both the preceding and following station in the template at the bottom? (and the one on Hampden Park to be modified similarly) That's how the trains actually run --87.82.21.198 21:36, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily, as most trains stop only once at Hampden Park (if at all), either on the way in or on the way out. Some trains, such as late morning/early afternoon services DO stop twice, but this is contrasted by the way that the Ashford International service doesn't stop at Hampden Park at all. Deanybabeh (talk) 23:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

message: Suggest the inclusion of the date of the booking hall. This must have been during the inter-war years, but when?
Mikeo1938 (talk) 09:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: By 'booking hall' I am referring to what is now the area inside the entrance from the taxi rank (Station Parade); this is just before you reach the photographer and the locksmith/shoe-repair shop. This detail would help to date photographs which feature the railway station. Mikeo1938 (talk) 12:16, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of booking hall
Talk:Ron Klinger

message: This guy is a serious and widely published bridge author who tours the UK (maybe elsewhere too). I have used his books in several articles and referred to them so I thought maybe I should start an article about him. Did I do wrong? My god but you guys are quick, do you have a system for spotting new articles?Abtract 21:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nils Dacke

message: I find several Wikipedia pages giving rather divergent versions of the same events. Can somebody with a good knowlege of Swedish history try to harmonise them a bit? Adam Keller 21:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated the page concerning Gustav Vasa to be in line with other pages. That Dacke were executed is in a sense true (but it was done post-humously). The latest published book about Vasa states as much. This book is a scientific work done by the history professor Lars-Olof Larsson even though its written in popular tone. 320rwekfpl 20:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Divergent versions of Nils Dacke's end
Talk:Skansen

message: The question of the relative ages of the first open air museums has been settled. The first one was founded at the Royal Manor of Bygdøy near Kristiania in 1881, ten years before Hazelius founded his open air museum Skansen. Hazelius visited Kristiania in 1885 and probably saw the newly founded museum there. His visit has never been documented, but his friendship with the founder Christian Holst is substantiated through their correspondence. When Hazelius started his fund-raising campaign for Skansen, he commissioned an illustration with a remarkable resemblance to the view of the Bygdøy open air museum, published in that museum's guidebook in 1888. For more details on this, see the book by Tonte Hegard: Romantikk og fortidsvern, Oslo 1984.
Roede 21:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First open air museum?
Talk:Homothety

message: I agree that this entry is poorly written. The sign of c is confusing. The slip between dilation and dilatation is unfortunate. I wouldn't say that: "Typical examples of dilatations are translations, ...". More to the point, typical examples of dilatations are dilations (which therefore need to be defined in this context). The last sentence is misleading since it implies that all homotheties have centers. 
On the other hand, the previous criticism is off the mark. It is nonsense that all affine maps send lines to parallel lines. As to multiplication by a negative number: this is a homothety, according to the definition of "homothety" given in this entry. Although the literature isn't entirely consistent, the definition given here is the one most commonly adopted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrantCairns (talk • contribs) 03:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfortunate formulations 

message: "image of every line L is a line parallel to L". Is it appropriate to use the term "line"?? Jackzhp (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely. Lines are well defined in affine geometry and this is also how it is introduced in college courses. BertSeghers (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: line?

message: Isn't this basically 'perspective' where S is the vanishing point? Can someone with more pedagogical writing chops put this into the article intelligently? 50.181.211.34 (talk) 21:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intuition for artists / any graduate of an 8th grade art class 

message: Please verify this part
in the edit  Special:Diff/1103639049 by User:Ag2gaeh.
Defining a value of a constant k with an expression dependent on k seems quite strange to me... --CiaPan (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for Your hint. I changed it.--Ag2gaeh (talk) 05:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  k = 1/k ?
Talk:Orville Redenbacher

message: In Business career, "They launched their popping corn in 1970"  
In Death and legacy, "2005 marked the 40th anniversary of Orville Redenbacher's."
Unless my math skills have really deteriorated, 1970 to 2005 doesn't amount to 40 years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JGrimes3180 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates don't match up 

message: This article has the tag: . I don't think it applies; to me, this article doesn't appear to me to fall into the "advertisement-like" category. Dissenting opinions?
Dave (talk) 22:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an advertisement
Talk:21st Panzer Division (Wehrmacht)

message: I am told that the 21st of Afrika Korps was destroyed and the 21st that fought in the west was a new formation. Someone should know this better than I do.
This is absolutely correct, it was indeed a new formation, named after 21st 'Afrika'.
I'll put in a bit more info on this to try and expand the article.
Dapi89 18:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contiunity between North Africa and Normandy 

message: I intended to greatly expand this article, but I am struggling to find the time, some help would be great!
Dapi89 19:21, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More help needed!! 

message: A lot of this article needs citations. I will add these asap.Dapi89 17:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: The first photograph of a divisional inspection in Normandy purports to also show Rommel. It does not- the officer, although of general rank , is plainly not Rommel as in the other 2 photos. Can this be corrected ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.135.235 (talk) 23:22, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Commons description of the picture specifically notes in German that Rommel is making the inspection, but he is out of shot. You can see this is the same inspection as the next two images. However, I can't see the point of having three pictures of the same inspection in this article anyway. (Hohum @) 13:19, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  photograph
Talk:Mark Paragua

message: hi just a question... from what city in the philippines he was raised and became popular?
:Hello! Sorry for the very late reply. I do know that he comes from the same hometown where I live. I managed to find an article that has this information and, accordingly, updated the article. Hope this helps :) --- Tito Pao (talk) 01:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Paragua is not the first Filipino to reach 2600 FIDE. It's Eugenio Torre. Demon Witch (talk) 09:58, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Torre's actual peak rating was 2580 in January 1983.  The Eugenio Torre article was wrong, but I've corrected it.  The claimed 2619 peak in 1986 is simply impossible, as FIDE was still rounding ratings to the nearest 5 points at that time.  I don't know where the 2619 figure came from, possibly it was chessmetrics.com.  Quale (talk) 21:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2600 FIDE 

message: https://twitter.com/GMHansNiemann/status/1578135318762602497 Thewriter006 (talk) 06:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Tweets generally are not usable as reliable sources.  Exceptions can be made, but this one does not look very suitable. Bruce leverett (talk) 02:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  did mark paragua cheat?
Talk:Short-eared dog

message: Added picture, removed tag Abbott75 08:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This was just published in April 2020. Enwebb (talk) 13:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New open access source 

message: How big is it? Drsruli (talk) 03:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size
Talk:Lee E. Emerson

message: Emerson used the initial "E." usually. There are 631 hits on google for "Earl", 10 for "Earle" when eliminating mirror sites. He probably hated his middle name which is why he seldom used it. "Earle" would be an unusual spelling anyway. It could be wrong both on his birth certificate, and, since the military insists on "something", could have copied the wrong birth certificate. We go with "common" usage. We don't try to introduce unusual spellings after the man has died. Student7 (talk) 13:17, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose we could state that he hated his middle name and never used it except when forced to and spelled it "Earl," thought it was spelled "Earle" on his "birth certificate." Note that these can be wrong too. Copied from town records. The town record could be wrong and spelled it differently from what his parents wanted. Student7 (talk) 13:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mispelling of middle name
Talk:William Saunders Crowdy

message: With the exception of the last sentence, there's no source for any of the material Tedickey (talk) 00:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life 

message: "learned the Hebrew prophets, especially Elijah."  Um, er, there ain't no Book of Elijah in the Bible . . .
73.49.1.133 (talk) 15:56, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Learned the Hebrew prophets?

message: The context within which I first encountered this topic made it plain that Crowdy was still residing in Maryland, near where he joined the army.  It doesn't seem plausible that he'd escaped to (for instance) New York and then come back for this. Tedickey (talk) 00:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  escape
Talk:Thermodynamic versus kinetic reaction control

message: This article needs to be changed to "Thermodynamic versus Kinetic reaction control" -- having "kinetic reaction control" redirect to "thermodynamic reaction control" makes no sense. That's like calling an article about acids and bases "acids," and having "bases" redirect to it. -216.145.255.2 18:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  title change 

message: I've taken the liberty to considerably expand the descriptive portion, as well as correct some errors in English. Illustrations of the other examples may in future be added. 
Pgpotvin (talk) 16:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  substantial editing 

message: Just taking a quick look, but this page does not talk about coordinates or stabilities very much, nor does it show free energy diagrams which would help people understand how coordinate control would be prefered once activation has been achieved opposed to random collision energy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.205.55.181 (talk) 14:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs more information 

message: I edited selectivity to also point to a general, not just stereo kind of selectivity. I hope this was correct. 178.38.76.37 (talk) 16:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Added selectivity

message: In the first sentence of the lede, the terms "thermodynamic control" and "kinetic control" are not defined, only contrasted or commented upon.
Nor are they defined later. Instead, they are obliquely re-characterized several times in the introduction, in different grammatical constructions and applying to different things: the reaction, the pathway, the parameters. It is a quagmire of metonymy.
I can guess that "thermodynamic control" means "the thermodynamically stable product is in the majority", but this is never stated. 
But it could mean something else -- something roughly associated to, but not equivalent to, what I said. In particular, the word "control" is confusing: it seems to refer to the method or intention of a control process, rather than the numerical ratio of the products (i.e. the selectivity). 
Are there cases where the changing parameters (pressure, temperature, other chemicals) change the identity of the thermodynamically stable product? How are the terms used then? Do they switch places and what entity do they attach to?
89.217.7.182 (talk) 20:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Fundamental definition lacking
Talk:Matthew Bloxam

message: Are there any sources to back up the spelling of "Bloxam" because I've seen two sources that use "Bloxham":
* http://www.rugbyfootballhistory.com/bloxham.html
* http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Mjyb5r3rMlsC - page 246. LunarLander // talk // 00:40, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct name?
Talk:Gary Lefley

message: As far as I'm aware Lefley's membership of the CP was not a secret to be 'exposed', he had quite openly stood for the executive of CPGB in the 1980s. Also, Julian Lewis was a member of an anti-CND organisation, the Coalition for Peace through Security, and as such might not be an accurate source alone. Sjeraj 21:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct regarding Lewis' point of view; but there is still the issue of CND's silence on the matter. Attempts to contact the organization via emails and calls were never returned. The least the organization could do was at least offer a statement. --Folajimi 22:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I was a Vice-Chair of CND at the time this "pro-Workers'-Bomb" paper came to light.  'Pariah in some circles' is damned right - that anyone in our employ could seriously argue that one nuke was more honourable than another is something a large number of us found indescribably offensive.  Lewis did not 'expose' the paper in question quite so much as he 'received it in the mail from someone at CND'.  --Handelaar 01:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Beats me. I do know that Bruce Kent was once pressed about ties to communism, and he denied those charges rather vehemently... --Folajimi 12:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

text: John Cox never tried to publish a paper saying that it was morally justifiable for a communist state to possess nuclear weapons.--Handelaar 01:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for explaining this Handelaar, now makes much more sense. Is there a copy of Leafley's article online that we can add as a link? Sjeraj 17:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Membership of the Communist Party
Talk:Gregg Hammann

message: There seems to be quite a lot of negative information both on this discussion page and on the main article that is being deleted. Even valid, referenced information. Someone is very keen on making this article as positive as possible with regards to Gregg. There is still lots of archived information in the History section.
It appears there is some disgruntled ex employee who continues to find the most negative aspects possible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealWash07 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amerikamura

message: I am wondering about the relation between Amerika Mura and Yoroppa Mura. I saw a map once where most of what I thought of as Amerika Mura was actually called Yoroppa Mura.
:My understanding is that Yoroppa Mura lies on the other side of Midosuji and is a bit more restricted towards the south. Amemura is fairly large, however. This article could use some improvement. Dekimasu 13:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amerikamura 

message: What does "Its reputation as a hangout for foreigners is a matter of degree" mean? Is this someones attempt at English (Engrish?)--99.177.248.92 (talk) 15:29, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?
Talk:Corrie (geology)

message: There is very little about Coombes on the Coombes page so do it. Cls14 00:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, at least the whole disambiguation part must be left in coombe if that's the case. I have no strong feelings whether the dicdef-like part at the top should be merged to this article, though. Punkmorten 21:10, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oppose The Coombe page serves as a disambig page for a huge number of places, and a coomb is not a corrie - a coomb is defined by Chambers 20th Century dictionary as 'a deep little wooded valley: a hollow in a hillside' and a corrie as 'a semicircular mountain recess or cirque'. I feel there is sufficient difference in meaning to justify keeping the articles separate. DuncanHill 11:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text:  Oppose per DuncanHill. `'mikka (t) 21:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Not Merge? 

message: Despite this article's assertion of a distinction, there actually isn't anything said in this article that isn't also in Cirque. Should be merged? The way, the truth, and the light 01:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cirque
Talk:Dow Finsterwald

message: I need the help of my fellow Wikipedians.  Finsterwald won 12 times on the PGA Tour between 1955 and 1963; however, I can only find 5 of them in my research on the web.  Please feel free to add tournaments as they are found.--Hokeman 22:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thanks so much for completing and Wikifying the PGA Tour wins template, and doing the same on the Bobby Nichols page. There is one other golfer, Bob Rosburg that lacks a single tournament win in order to complete his PGA wins template. All I know is that it was before 1961. If you have a resource which has this information (which you obviously do) please add it.--Hokeman 21:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excellent job Tewapack for finding the rest of the PGA Tour wins
Talk:List of Zoids video games

message: This article is the result of a text datadump in the main Zoids article. It is unsuitable for its old location, and needs some TLC before it can become encyclopedic. I'd do it, but I have no knowledge of the Zoids games beyond the Zoids Saga series, minimal interest in the games themselves, and a long trip bush in a few weeks time.
If someone can respond to the tags and salvage something from this, good on ya. If its nominated for deletion, no protest from me. -- saberwyn 22:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where is the game, Zoids: Battle legends? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.170.197.10 (talk) 18:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Zoids Battle Legends is Zoids VS II —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Saberwyn (talk • contribs) 00:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  game missing 

message: "Kiju no Senshi Hyuu", "機獣の戦士ヒュウ"
Shouldn't there be a english translation from the Japanese title?
I think it's something like, "Mechanical Beast Warrior Hugh"?
Sakota 03:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyberdrive Zoids (GBA) 

message: Why do people keep adding these to the article?  If you cover unofficial content related to Zoids, then you have to consider all sorts of other fanworks, and that's not really Wiki's aim (and there's a LOT more fan games besides these).  Wouldn't they be better off on a Zoids-centered Wiki? Storchofdoom (talk) 02:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unofficial Zoids Games 
Talk:Nazi hunter

message: I linked (on a talk page) to the accompanying article via an Rdr i created. In doing so, i am ignoring the restriction on the article's topic which i evoke in my title for this talk section's title: My concern was a set of Nazi war crimes in which the primary and probably only motivations were part of Third Reich war-guilt, but connected to anti-Semitism (if at all, almost entirely) in this sense:
: that the monstrosities of brutality, scapegoating / outsider-defamation, and totalitarianism are (in some sense, and if you will indulge my choice of wording) psycho-socially natural bedfellows.
   Someone may feel impelled (especially since i may never find the task rising far enuf in my priorities to do so myself) to either broaden the scope of Nazi hunter, renaming appropriately, or at least add a hatnote Dab to that page to our coverage of Pursuit and prosecution of non-Holocaust Axis war criminals, which could embrace (to mention four directions of expansion -- in at least three dimensions) 
* German (& other European Axis-members') politically and ethnically motivated massacres and summary executions, on Eastern Front
* Italian indiscriminate used of war gasses in Second Italo-Ethiopian War
* Japanese enslavement of Korean comfort women
* Bataan Death March
Jerzy•t 09:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "... [P]rivate individual ... [pursuing those effecting] the Holocaust"