lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Karpas Peninsula

message: Can Karpass be considered a 'peninsula', comparable to the Iberian, Italian or Californian peninsulas, or is it actually a cape?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laocoont (talk • contribs) 21:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Peninsula or cape?

message: I think that the title should be changed to either be the "Karpasia Peninsula" or "Karpasia/Karpass peninsula.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.197.246 (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to change name
Talk:Magnificent Mile

message: At the bottom of the history section it is written "By 1979, the State Street commercial corridor had lost its commercial vitality and was closed to street traffic for renovation including sidewalk widening until 1996." State street was closed to street traffic in 1979 to create a pedestrian mall hoping that it would bring back shoppers to the area during the era of suburbanisation. This plan did not work and the city reopened State Street to traffic in 1996.
https://www.wbez.org/shows/dynamic-range/the-short-sad-life-of-state-streets-pedestrian-mall/f1ebf2b0-2f64-4542-9f18-83123216400d Yitshok (talk) 04:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information
Talk:Hook (Blues Traveler song)

message: Anon 74, the correct place to discuss what to include or exclude in the article is on this talk page here. If you have something you want to say, please put it here and not directly on the article page itself. Also, please refrain from blanking the page entirely and starting over, as that removes the "good" parts as well as the bad (in particular, the category, stub, and unref tags).
Having said all of that: Which info is not true? What info do you think is correct? Do you have any references?
Nerwen 00:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

message: As much as I enjoy cracked.com, is an article from a humor website really a reliable source for interpreting the meaning of a song?  Not that I'm questioning the interpretation, mind you, but I think citing Cracked actually makes this article look less reliable than if there was no source at all for that statement. Psychojosh13 (talk) 13:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable source?
Talk:Hiroshi Agasa

message: I'd like to request that someone gets a useable picture of Dr. Agasa for this page. I would apreciate it. I mean the other characters seem to have pictures. Just makesure it is allowed here due to wikipedia guidlines on images - Prede (talk) 23:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind I found and uploaded a picture myself. It's now on the artcile. - Prede (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I don't know much about it but I added it in the character information. Maybe it should be adjusted to fit better.Dragonsblast (talk) 06:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agasa's past
Talk:Alvin and the Chipmunks (film)

message: I have seen the movie 30+ times and their is nothing like the one mentioned at the end of the movie and squirrels are not agitated when the tree is cut down so I am deleting both parts on the article. == --Marchbaby321 21:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  problems with squirell(I am sorry I cannot spell squirrel right but anyways)

message: I haven't seen it, but isn't this more of a "reboot" kind of thing than a prequel? David (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this film classed as a prequel? 

message: This article is supposed to be about the film, it seems excessive to have a very long section criticizing one actor from the film. Perhaps this whole section might be better if it was moved entirely to the article about David Cross? It is mentioned in his article there but much more briefly. 
The lengthy criticism of Cross seems ... well I want to say WP:UNDUE but it is probably somewhat fair but excessively long and certainly a little offtopic. Perhaps someone could trim it back a bit. It also seems excessive to  include a photograph of Patton Oswalt in an article about Alvin and The Chipmunks when he does not appear in the film. I thought there might have been some discussion about the section but I checked the talk page and the talk pages archives and apparently not. 
I hope someone will trim this back to a more reasonable and measured section. Maybe in a few weeks I will come back and try to improve it myself, if no one does it first, or explains why the section needs to be so long and detailed. -- 109.79.75.247 (talk) 21:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross 

message: I propose that section Alvin and the Chipmunks#Music be split into a separate page called Alvin and the Chipmunks (soundtrack). The content of the current page seems off-topic and the section is large enough to make their own page. 122.173.37.181 (talk) 10:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal
Talk:A. J. Murray (baseball)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20070813110141/http://www.caller.com/ccct/hooks/article/0,1641,CCCT_17996_3963027,00.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 01:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Livadeia

message: Was Livadeia inhabited by Arvanites befour revolution?--213.151.217.134 (talk) 00:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be another Livadeia in Greece, on the isle of Crete. It is mentioned as follows in the article on the Greco-Turkish_War (1897)#Prelude to war: on 7 February [1897] the first full-scale battle between Greeks and Turks occurred, when the Greek expeditionary force in Crete defeated a 4,000-strong Ottoman force at the Battle of Livadeia, Crete. - which again is quoted in the articles:
* 1897 in Italy#February: when the Greek expeditionary force in Crete defeated a 4,000-strong Ottoman force at the Battle of Livadeia, Crete.
* List of wars involving Greece#1833-1899.
Livadeia on the isle of Crete is mentioned too in the article List of shipwrecks in July 1944#14 July as the place at which the ship Suzanne was sunk. Then it should be a coastal town. As it seems a possibly deleted article which did tell Livadia, Rethymno (Λιβάδια) is a community in Rethymno regional unit, Greece - once did exist, as on this Greece.com page such an article has been cited. Finally this Angelfire.com page written in Dutch provides the exact location of Livadia Beach near the town of Kastelli Kissamos on the isle of Crete. 
According to Google Maps however these are the actual locations of the town Livadia: 35,308102, 24,807261. See it yourself! This Livadia is more prone to be the town in which surroundings the battle took place. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 06:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet another Livadeia 
Talk:Glanders

message: Equinia redirects to this article, but it is possible that Equinia is also a valid genus of tapeworms. See :Wikidata:Q95496288. However, it is hard to find any species from this genus--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equinia as a genus?
Talk:Mitch Tennison

message: I feel there is no need for this. If there is please state what needs to be re-written. What should we re-write in order to remove this tag? I don't want to remove it myself sense I am not sure why it is here in the first place. please comment on this. - Prede (talk) 21:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  in-universe Tag
Talk:George Kaminski

message: "That record-holding "gentleman" was George Kaminski, a Pennsylvania prisoner who had plucked 72,927 four-leaf clovers from prison yards, taking the title in 1995. (The previous record was 7,000.) But Kaminski, who spent much of his life in prison for various felonies, had recently caught a bad break: Authorities had transferred him to a minimum-security facility that didn't sprout much clover." 
Four leaf clover champion Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 03:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection?
Talk:Black Organization (Case Closed)

message: I put on a cleanup tag on this article. It is fully disorganized and has a very big trivia section which ought to be integrated. Since I don't have much interest in this part of Conan, I'd rather ask others to do this. --Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 21:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup raised 

message: Per a request for a neutral editor to make this suggestion, I am tagging multiple character articles for merge here as it is felt that they fail all relevant notability guidelines for having their own articles: WP:N, WP:PLOT, and WP:WAF. They are believed to have no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources and are incapable of reaching GA status. As such, it is felt that they should be merged to this sublist of the main Case Closed character list. I've created individual sections below for each character. Please leave your views in each. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: Functionally the main antagonist for most of the series, and I imagine that manga and anime reviews could bring up some comments on him that could give third party sources.kuwabaratheman (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm unsure on this one. She's important, but I don't know what third party sources could be found. If some reliable ones could be found, I'd say to keep the article, but if not, it'd be hard to oppose merging.kuwabaratheman (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Support: Basically invisible even when he's on screen.kuwabaratheman (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Support or Merge all: "They [...] have no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources and are incapable of reaching GA status." That may change someday, but right now, these articles are nothing but paraphrased plot summaries. -- Goodraise (talk) 06:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character merges 

message: :Oppose: Functionally the main antagonist for most of the series, and I imagine that manga and anime reviews could bring up some comments on him that could give third party sources.kuwabaratheman (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Gin (Case Closed)]]

message: :I'm unsure on this one. She's important, but I don't know what third party sources could be found. If some reliable ones could be found, I'd say to keep the article, but if not, it'd be hard to oppose merging.kuwabaratheman (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Sharon Vineyard]]

message: :Support: Basically invisible even when he's on screen.kuwabaratheman (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Vodka (Case Closed)]]

message: :Support or Merge all: "They [...] have no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources and are incapable of reaching GA status." That may change someday, but right now, these articles are nothing but paraphrased plot summaries. -- Goodraise (talk) 06:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: General
Talk:Connected sum

message: For the connected sum of knots to be well defined, one has to consider oriented knots in 3-space.  To define the connected sum for two oriented knots:
# Consider a planar projection of each knot and suppose these projections are disjoint.
# Find a rectangle in the plane where one pair of sides are arcs along each knot but is otherwise disjoint from the knots and so that the arcs of the knots on the sides of the rectangle are oriented around the boundary of the rectangle in the same direction.
# Now join the two knots together by deleting these arcs from the knots and adding the arcs that form the other pair of sides of the rectangle.
The resulting connected sum knot inherits an orientation consistent with the orientations of the two original knots, and the oriented ambient isotopy class of the result is well-defined, depending only on the oriented ambient isotopy classes of the original two knots.  In this manner, oriented ambient isotopy classes of oriented knots form a commutative unique factorization monoid.
If one does not take into account the orientations of the knots, the connected sum operation is not well defined on isotopy classes of (nonoriented) knots.  To see this, consider two noninvertible knots K, L which are not equivalent (as unoriented knots); for example take the two pretzel knots K = P(3,5,7) and L = P(3,5,9).  Let K+ and K- be K with its two inequivalent orientations, and let L+ and L- be L with its two inequivalent orientations.  There are four oriented connected sums we may form:
* A = K+ # L+
* B = K- # L-
* C = K+ # L-
* D = K- # L+
The oriented ambient istotopy classes of these four oriented knots are all distinct.  And, when one considers ambient isotopy of the knots without regard to orientation, there are two distinct equivalence classes:  { A ~ B } and { C ~ D }.  To see that A and B are unoriented equivalent, simply note that they both may be constructed from the same pair of disjoint knot projections as above, the only difference being the orientations of the knots.  Similarly, one sees that C and D may be constructed from the same pair of disjoint knot projections.
-- Chuck 14:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Chuck. The article would be much improved if you were to add this stuff to it. Joshua R. Davis 18:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connected sum of knots requires orientation of the knots to be well defined.
Talk:Fay School

message: This page had been grossly vandalized and requires revisions
207.41.4.132 00:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry for the inconvenience. Please contact me on my talk page if you need to edit and can't.  Dlohcierekim  02:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  semi-protected 

message: Per school article guidelines (WP:WPSCH/AG, and WP:LISTPEOPLE, notable people sections should only include listing of people with established notability.  They are not for the inclusion of every or even several people who have had accomplishments from the school.  Notability is established by coverage in reliable independent sources.  Listpeople requires that you show enough notability for someone to be put into a list like this to create a Wikipedia article on them, with some very narrow exceptions.  The simplest standard to use is "Do they have an existing Wikipedia article?"  They still can be included without that, but you have to have sourcing completely independent of the subject that covers them in detail and shows that they are connected to the school.  Please note that notability is never inherited from your family or who you have associated with.  On point for this article, that means that just because you were in the Rough Riders or you played in a famous band does not automatically make you notable.  You have to have referencing showing the individual did some things notable and more importantly, that others have written about it.  Wikipedia is a tertiary source like all encyclopedias and should only cover what others are writing about in reliable sources (WP:RS). Gtwfan52 (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What constitutes a Notable Alumni 
Talk:Connection (principal bundle)

message: The definition given is Vp=Tp(Pπ(p)) but I'm confused by this since π(p) is in the base space but this gives the impression that it is in the
total space P. The definition given in C. Isham Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists is
V_p = \{\tau\in T_p P | \pi_* \tau = 0\} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gannektakazoink (talk • contribs) 17:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: They coincide if Pπ(p) means the fiber π-1(π(p)) (which is a manifold) and Tp(Pπ(p)) means the tangent space to the fiber at the point p. In other words, vertical vectors are tangent vectors to the fibers, i.e., equivalence classes of curves in the fiber π-1(π(p)). Mgvongoeden (talk) 16:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vertical space definition "Relation to Ehresmann connections" 

message: Please never abuse ad for Ad, please!  Zhang875 (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ad and ad
Talk:Granite dome

message: Half Dome was not really 'glacier-sliced,' see http://www.yosemite.org/visitor/frequent-geology.htm. I don't have a more authoritative source, but it should be possible to dig one up. 171.66.39.105 00:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Yes, there are gobs of granite domes in Yosemite, but we shouldn't make the article a love-fest for one American National Park. Other images? dino 17:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the images to a gallery at the bottom of the page. This looks better.Cyberia23 (talk) 17:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many Yosemite images

message: Would there be any objections to making "Exfoliation dome" the primary entry for this article.  Exfoliation dome is used much more widely, can be used to describe similar features in other types of rock, and is the best explanation for the geomorphology seen in the Yosemite Valley.  Although the term "granite dome" does exists, it has fallen out of use and was replaced (by the original author) with the term "desert dome" to describe rounded masses of rock formed by prolonged exposure to desert climates (which is not the case with Half Dome).  Rygel, M.C. (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exfoliation dome as the primary page for this information 

message: I'm new to Wikipedia. Would this page be the kind of page I can use as a reference for granite: http://designskitchen.co.za/benefits-of-granite-kitchen-countertops.html. Please help. Thanks KarlKarlstadler (talk) 19:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As that is a commercial website, I would think not. Commercial websites are typically designed to promote their product and make a sale (see the "Get a quote" link on the page) and not to provide unbiased information. Fails WP:reliable sources. Vsmith (talk) 19:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

text: I agree with Vsmith - such a reference would almost invariably be construed as link-spam and reverted.  Velella  Velella Talk   17:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Granite 

message: I seem to recall much was made of glacial action in the formation of Half Dome (& the Glacier Apron) when I visited Yosemite, yet there is no mention of that here - why?  Also, I disagree with the first post above, you can't have too many images of Yosemite! ;)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.196.5.155 (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glacial action? 
Talk:James Island (South Carolina)

message: "and from Europe, England and Africa by the Atlantic Ocean. "
Yeah it's less funny when you realize that this is the reason why wikipedia can never be taken seriously. Congratulation on your life's work, Jimbo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.75.119.70 (talk) 03:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Funny 

message: pls add normal maps to show location , as in regard to charleston and in regard to so car ... wah heennie jr 24.186.53.181 (talk) 16:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: normal maps
Talk:Tolai people

message: There are no references cited for the assertions made in this article.  Without references the assertions made in this article can not be independently verified as to their accuracy or truth.  This article can be made encyclopedic by going through it and citing the sources of the assertions.  See Wikipedia:Citing sources for help. K. Kellogg-Smith 01:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced tag
Talk:Serena Sebastian

message: Serena Sebastian's mother is named, and their are like 3 or 4 episodes I saw with her in them recently. She is named, and they show us a alot about her. They revial a lot of info on her. I don't recall her name though, so if someone could find it(i can't seem to find it on the internet) then please edit this artcile and put it under "known relatives" The space is there for her. We have her father and sister down, just not her mother. - Prede (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Her Mother
Talk:Shuichi Akai (Case Closed)

message: Please put a spoiler warning in this article. The mentioned chapter 609 was published on 
23. May 2007 - just a few days ago. It´s not even published in a jap. volume, and not everyone want to know the character is probably killed!
:Even the spoiler tag is seriously considered for deleteion, should I even consider adding a spoiler tag now? --Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 12:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What I'm talking about is not necessity, but the fact that there is a high probability that the rule of spoiler warning would be removed at all. Now WP:SPOILER has been downgraded from a guideline from a proposed guideline for that particular reason; I see no reason to add spoiler tags on this article unless the guideline would stay.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 15:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler warning!?
Talk:Clarence Vaughn

message: NOT Journalism. Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports on breaking stories. Wikipedia is not a primary source.  Wikipedia does have many encyclopedia articles on topics of historical significance that are currently in the news, and can be updated with recent verified information.
NOT News reports. Wikipedia properly considers the long-term historical notability of persons and events, keeping in mind the harm our work might cause. The fact that someone or something has been in the news for a brief period of time does not automatically justify an encyclopedia article. While Wikipedia strives to be comprehensive, the policies on biographies of living persons and neutral point of view should lead us to contextualize events appropriately.
This site needs to be properly edited so that MY name is no longer slandered on Wikipedia because of current affairs.  Editing attempts have been made but are not being acknowledged.  Wikipedia will now have to get involved.  Thanks to my TRUE fans who have supported me thus far.
Clarence Vaughn 20:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'm not sure whether or not you are who you say you are, but regardless, you are correct. Wikipedia's not a rap sheet. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What Wikipedia Is

message: That material does not belong in this article, as per our WP:BLP policy. Do not re-add ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We've been more specific. If you don't want to read up on our policy and give a good reason why we should make an exception, I don't know what we can do for you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:BLP]]