Talk:Barkley, Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden

message: As "notable" as this phenomenon is, I am going to have to remove the joke elements and throw in some references from the media sources that covered it. I am not sure if the screenshots count as fair use, either. --DJH47 (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That probably would not be a valid assumption. Fair use essentially requires each image to be informative to article rather than decorative. The DX10 image, which is clearly not (for laymen, Barkley's claim that it uses DirectX 10 is a joke), would have to be licensed to the Wikimedia foundation under the GFDL or placed into the public domain. "Non-commercial" simply fails to cover the scope. --DJH47 (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: :Image:Backley.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Backley.PNG

message: :The following contrib was misplaced just above the sig line in the section preceding this new secn (technically creating a forgery.)--Jerzy•t 05:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplaced contrib 

message: This game was covered in Eurogamer: http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=93941  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obonicus (talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article in Eurogamer 

message: Is it a sign how bad the original game is that the article for the unofficial game is 10 times longer than the one for the original game?
:It's a sign how bad Wikipedia is. The Hero of This Nation (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: That makes absolutely no sense. Probably just a test edit by a clueless user putting in their own (indian) name. I don't see it anywhere on Google besides copies of Wikipedia content 67.174.39.160 (talk) 09:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Maker suryas 

message: Re-tagged the article with plot tag. This article consists mostly of a plot summary and as per WP:GAMECRUFT, it should focus on real world details instead. --Jtalledo (talk) 16:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long plot 

message: Please would an interested editor assess the material and citations at the abandoned rewrite User:Sirsabeza/sandbox/Barkley, incorporate what is useful, blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 09:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft