lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Witch hazel (astringent)

message: The supposed use of witch hazel to renew furniture finishes sounds to me like it's simply an effect of the alcohol in the preparation acting as a solvent.  Does witch hazel work any better for this purpose than a simple alcohol-water mixture with a similar amount of alcohol? 216.59.230.140 03:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the above discussion, the essential oil content in drug store witch hazel is miniscule.  A typical bottle might have 14% alcohol, ~85% water, and ~1% extracts and other stuff.  So no, it's mostly water and would probably damage furniture.  I'm removing that part of the article. Gigs (talk) 00:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Furniture 

message: The entire "Composition of extract and uses" section is really terribly written and poorly cited  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.254.14.20 (talk) 01:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken care of it. Thanks for bringing it up. Asgardiator Iä! Iä! 00:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section rewrite needed  
Talk:XSP

message: The XSP (software) article included mention of the militech trademark for XSP before it was reverted.  Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) indicates that using trademarks should be avoided, however I'm curious whether others consider it is useful to mention trademarks on a DAB page. John Vandenberg 03:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  trademark and militech
Talk:Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

message: The Article states, " The most influential, powerful and superbly rich CM was basher ahmed bilour who was the most efficient, loved and respected CM of all time." This article is wrong on two accounts: 1) Basher A Bilour was never a CM 2) He being the   most efficient, loved and respected is very subjective. 
 Please make the appropriate correction and remove this statement from the article. 
Arif Khan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.40.59.114 (talk) 08:51, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

message: This article should be move to List of chief ministers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Arabi Abrar (talk) 04:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is focused on the current Chief Minister. To avoid confusion its important to distinguish this article from the one dedicated to former Chief Ministers(List of chief ministers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa). This separation ensures clarity and helps readers easily access the relevant information they are seeking. 2402:E000:65C:B17A:3A44:28C7:4E2B:B07F (talk) 11:28, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Band of stability

message: The page I started is coming along well. PatPeter 20:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New article

message: Alright, who changed the name of this page, why and what is the reason for it? -23PatPeter*∞ 20:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's now been moved back to Band of stability, after a brief spell as Nuclear valley. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Is this different from Island of Stability? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.153.59 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. See Island of stability, which is a region at the far end of the band (or valley) of stability. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island
Talk:Edward Waring

message: I'll remove the section for the following reasons
* Not sourced
* No indication of what is due to Waring
* In particular, the expression of sums of th powers of two variables in term of their sums and product is a special case of Newton's identities. Thus Waring can certainly not be credited for them, even if it may have rediscover them independently.
* Otherwise, there is nothing but an example in this new section
Nevertheless there are much more to say about symmetric systems of equations, but this article is not the place for that. D.Lazard (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section on symmetric equation
Talk:Benjamin Peirce

message: This Benjamin Peirce is too early to be the author of A Short Table of Integrals by Benjamin Osgood Peirce, "Hollis Professor of Mathematics and Natural Philosophy in Harvard University" (also at Harvard note) - so surely that was his son? http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9A03EEDD1730E733A25756C1A9679C946596D6CF&oref=slogin   So is H. H. D. the daughter and Benjamin Osgood Peirce II the unnamed son? --catslash (talk) 17:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: B.O. Peirce is from a different progeny, as was G. W. Pierce, also a Harvard scientist. B.O. Peirce was not a quaternion enthusiast, as were James Mill Peirce and his father Benjamin.Rgdboer (talk) 21:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, it's clear now; they were second cousins once removed (i.e. Benjamin's great-grandfather Jerathmiel was Benjamin Osgood's great-great-grandfather), and the four of them (Benjamin, Benjamin, Benjamin Osgood 2nd and James Mill) were all at Harvard (according to http://books.nap.edu/html/biomems/bpeirce.pdf). I can't understand now why I didn't guess that. Thanks again for the swift reply --catslash (talk) 22:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Did he have a son of the same name?

message: Can someone confirm, that the Peirce-decomposition of rings was introduced by Benjamin Peirce and not by Benjamin Osgood Peirce?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.250.27.6 (talk) 17:41, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peirce-decomposition
Talk:Spectro-temporal receptive field

message: I believe there is a major error in this article. STRFs in the auditory system typically refer to spectrotemporal receptive fields, NOT spatiotemporal receptive fields, as the receptive field for a neuron responding to auditory stimuli would have an auditory frequency component along with its temporal component. 
This is even mentioned in the figure, which is of a spectrotemporal RF. Sirshane13 03:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are both right. I have moved the page (many years later!). --mcld (talk) 22:48, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Spatio- vs Spectro-
Talk:Genesis3D

message: I'd like to remove the term "open source" from the description and replace it with some other term.  It seems to me that the Genesis license does not meet the conditions of the Open Source Initiative Open Source Definition.  There is an "Eclipse public license" that is apparently OSI-approved but it differs from the Genesis license in some significant ways.  Thoughts about how to deal with this are requested. 67.117.130.181 03:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why Genesis3D should not meet these conditions. There are plenty of open source projects with a very similar license. I strongly suggest undoing your changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.117.104.149 (talk) 08:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open source? 

message: The article states that this was a competitor for the "current reigning 3D Engine known as the "Doom" engine". But if this was released in 98, then the Doom engine was outdated and not reigning. The reigning engines at the time were probably the Build engine and Quake's engine. DoppElgangEr 16:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True. I reworded that sentence a bit. One point is that the source code of the Doom engine was released at the time, but only for non-commercial use. In 1998, Genesis3D was the only 3D engine (or at least the only professional-quality 3D engine) that could be used in a commercial project without paying royalties, so in a way it had no competitors at all. — Graf Bobby 16:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current reigning 3D Engine?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports Car Racing

message: Hey guys, I'd like to ask, is there a place where you guys chat and coordenate? Something like a Discord server or a WhatsApp/Telegram/Messenger DM group?
I'd like to get in contact with you guys.
Cheers! Juim1j (talk) 19:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Sports Car Racing External Contact 

message: 2007 24 Hours of Le Mans has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[2007 24 Hours of Le Mans]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:1972 World Sportscar Championship#Requested move 29 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Bensci54 (talk) 17:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:1972 World Sportscar Championship#Requested move 29 February 2024]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:1988 World Sportscar Championship#Requested move 29 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Bensci54 (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:1988 World Sportscar Championship#Requested move 29 February 2024]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:1968 World Sportscar Championship#Requested move 29 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Bensci54 (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:1968 World Sportscar Championship#Requested move 29 February 2024]]
Talk:1-Pentanol

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Penta-1-Ol. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 22#Penta-1-Ol until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Mdewman6 (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Penta-1-Ol" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:RSD-10 Pioneer

message: Can someone explain to me how could Pershing with range of 1600 km and Tomahawk with range of 1100 km counter SS-20 with range 5000 km and warheads larger than those of Pershing and Tomahawk combined.99.231.59.7 03:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The German, Danish and Finnish versions seem to be titled RT-21M.  What would that be?--Rumping 22:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RT-21M

message: RT2 variants derivations , temp 2s 2sm , pioner , etc are all correlated , check fas globsec miltomsk astronautix other .
--Zafer14ur8 (talk) 23:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RT-21P also 

message: or known as "SS-20" - in GDR and CSSR ? No confirmation for this claim, see:  --93.104.42.156 (talk) 09:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: RSD-10 Pioneer

message: In the infobox it says that the CEP is 150-450 meters. On the Russian Wikipedia it says that the accuracy is .55 km CEP. That would be 550 meters. Which one is it?
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%A1%D0%94-10 Moonshot926 (talk) 05:40, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: today i saw notif wik ' ' 3M-51 Alfa was linked from SS-20 Saber. See all links to this page.
12 hours ago ' '
? i dont get it , what mean .
--Zafer14ur8 (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You created 3M-51 Alfa.  When another article links to it, you will get a notification. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikimsg
Talk:Victory Bomber

message: "The bomber design was based naturally on geodetic construction in which Wallis was an expert having used it for several aircraft including the Vickers Wellington."... huh?!??
I can't figure out how this relates to aircraft design. Am I just dense? Pjbflynn 20:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's just confusingly worded. The Wellington used geodetic construction for the fuselage (and wings from the look of it). Here's the first relevant image that Google found: http://www.bomber-command.info/blwimpy6.htm Mark Grant 20:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I've re-worded that section, hopefully it's less confusing now. Mark Grant 20:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just realized that geodesic had been misspelled as geodetic. Pjbflynn (talk) 02:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geodetic Construction? 

message: The conversions "50 ton (45 tonne)", "75 ton (68 tonne) and 100 ton (90 tonne)" only work when "ton" is a short ton. I thought the typical (so to say) non-metric ton in the UK was the long ton.
Shouldn't it be ""," and "?ospalh (talk) 20:24, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Come to think of it, one of the two sources is an American book. So who knows what kind of tons that are. Unfortunately, there is a bit of a difference. I think it should be at least spelled out what ton was used.ospalh (talk) 20:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The 'tons' used in the original specification would have been the long ton - all tons used in the UK until metrication were long tons (2,240lb).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long or short tons?
Talk:CMLL World Women's Championship

message: I changed the lead from "...is the top female professional wrestling championship..." because that this suggests a competition that no other championship might field better wrestlers.  No doubt the organisation has its strengths but they should be presented without POV.  Gregkaye (talk) 07:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Best! How?

message: The lead needs a lot of work.
Who is the current champion? The body says "Princesa Sugehit is the current CMLL World Women's Champion" but then the infobox says someone else.
Then there's the last sentence:
"is the only Women's Championship and one of the only of two championships, the other being the IWGP Heavyweight Championship to be defended in the country of North Korea at the event Collision in Korea in a match between at the time CMLL World Women's Champion Akira Hokuto successfully defeated against Bull Nakano"
That's poor English and incoherent. Can someone tidy it up? I would but I've no idea what it's supposed to mean. Valenciano (talk) 17:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead is a mess
Talk:Path 27

message: I find it odd that the route description begins at the "end" of the power delivery and not at the generating station in Utah. Alanbrowne (talk) 00:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the description should follow the direction of power - from east to west. TGCP (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment about Route description in the article

message: The image of the IPP station has been deleted from the article for copyright infringement; more exactly, I failed to provide sufficient licensing information for the source material upon upload. That said, if anyone reads this, you can help by replacing the image with your own. Upload it through Creative Commons, and place it in the Converter subsection using Template:Multiple images.
P.S. Sorry, Wikipedia, for my carelessness!
Nebulous2357 (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Image Needed! IPP station
Talk:GM 4T60-E transmission

message: The Grand Prix GT was never supercharged to my knowledge. Does anyone know of this "supercharged" GT? The GTP was supercharged, but I don't think the GT ever was, at least not stock anyway. This also leads me to ask if the GT has ever had the 4t60HD  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dblack74 (talk • contribs) 04:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Prix GT - Supercharged? 

message: 2007 Buick Lascerne 3.8 engine just changed all the transmission fluid out of it and new filter now it won’t go into fourth gear ribs to 5000 RPMs but won’t go any faster 2603:9001:2A0B:D7E0:B130:12B0:1274:5411 (talk) 21:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 Buick Lucerne 3.8 won’t go out of third gear into fourth and his revving RPMs up to 5000 but not going any faster
Talk:Corwin Hansch

message: Perhaps to move the publications searches from ==Notes== to separate heading?
My search links in WorldCat, PubMed stand improvement, e.g. Pubmed links in eutil format?
Other databases: What about his articles in journal which are not in Pubmed's scope? Also needs citation bibliometric data (ISI Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar).
Is there a complete bibliography? Perhaps at the Pomona College Archive?
-- Yohananw (talk) 05:08, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Baker City, Oregon/Archive 1

message: Baker City boasts a good mix of historic buildings and some incredible scenery.  Located in the Powder River Valley, it is located between the Eagle Cap Range of the Wallowa Mountains (to the north and east) --and the Elkhorn Range (to the west).  Baker City is a recreation paradise with activities including: hunting, fishing, skiing, hiking, mountain biking, rafting, rock climbing ...
If you stop into Baker City, be sure to stop at Barley Brown's Brew Pub.  Barley Brown's is one of the top rated brewpubs in the northwest.  All of their beer is brewed on-site and the food is fantastic!!!!  At the 2006 North American Brewers Association's "North American Beer Awards", Barley Brown's collected 8 Medals (2 Gold, 1 Silver, 5 Bronze) to complement their 2 Medals (1 Gold, 1 Bronze) in 2005.  Stop by and see Tyler Brown & Shawn Kelso, the brewers, and ask them what they would recommend.  My personnal favorites are the 3-time Medallist "Whiskey Malt Ale" and if you're lucky enough to get some ... the Scotch Ale.
--T.England 18:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic Town ... with a little culture
Talk:Iberian–Armenian War

message: There seems to be a back and forth on the question of who actualy won. It reads that the Iberians attacked and asserted control over Armenia in 50-51, which concluded the immediate conflict. However this was followed by a Parthian invasion in 52, which aimed to instal Tiridates as King of Armenia. I think, just like with the seperate events and dates, the outcome can also be seperated for two events. TheMightyGeneral (talk) 21:11, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victor
Talk:Battle of Dien Bien Phu/Archive 1

message: Can anyone verify the linked document below, it appears to contradict the above revision:
The American Response to the Geneva Declarations, 3 July 21, 1954
J d noonan 12:15, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geneva Accords 

message: Sorry for being on topic, but --
The battle summary table gives numbers for French causalities which seem to exceed the number of soldiers. Although I understand that this probably comes from the reinforcements constantly flewn in, it's fairly confusing at first.
Wouldn't it be better to simply insert the total number of French soldiers involved? -- Syzygy 11:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Casualities? 

message: Is the Ph in Phu pronounced like an f or an aspirated p?Cameron Nedland 00:50, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know how a vietnamese speaker would pronounce it, but in english it is always pronounced as an 'f'. Raul654 00:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It's pronounced like an "f". See Vietnamese alphabet. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 04:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks guys.Cameron Nedland 19:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation 

message: According to "History of PAVN's General Staff in the anti-French resistance war", PAVN's General Staff, 1991, total losses of Viet Minh (or PAVN) in the battle of Dien Bien Phu were 4,020 KIA, 792 MIA, 9,118 WIA.
Truong Son 08:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That number strikes me as being very low - the PAVN had virtually no medical facilities, so the relatiely high wounded-to-killed ratio is even more surprising. Raul654 13:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viet Minh losses 

message: How about not using phrases like Hà-Nội, Hải-Phòng, and Sài Gòn, but still allowing phrases like Ðiện Biên Phủ, Võ Nguyên Giáp, and Hồ Chí Minh?  Diacritics can do no harm, but on the contrary provide more information. --Ionius Mundus 00:17, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ðiện Biên Phủ

message: Raul654, however, protected the main page without providing a protection summary. I'm sure this is to stop ongoing edit wars. If so, please add  to the main page. I requested that at WP:RfPP, after I looked at this page there that an "edit warring" user wanted it to be unprotected. But the request was removed. -- ADNghiem501 01:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --CBD 11:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected
Talk:The Watersons

message: Re: "Their distinctive sound comes from their closely-woven harmonies." Is this really true? My impression is that most of the time they weren't singing true harmony at all; they sang in unison with occasional harmony notes. I'll leave it as is hoping that someone who knows more about it than I can look at it for possible revision.Chris k 03:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've taken out the template  - doesn't seem to fit as "The Watersons" were not a 'member' of the Albion Band, although some people have been in both.   pablohablo. 14:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fully agree. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albion Band 

message: The link on John Harrison's name in the first paragraph leads to an article about a 17th century person, and not the man who used to be a member of the Watersons. The disambiguation page linked to from that article lists the relevant John Harrison but does not link to an article. The link should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucy Kemnitzer (talk • contribs) 23:13, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: . Agreed, thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Spurious link in the first paragraph

message: What happened to him after the group first broke up ? -- Beardo (talk) 06:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Harrison
Talk:Langerhans cell

message: How are these cells related to histiocytes? If these cells are not histiocytes, then why is the disease called histiocytosis? — Chris53516 (Talk) 15:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Histiocyte 

message: can someone confirm that they are S100 positive.  and if so, why are they S100 positive if they are not neural crest derrived?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.151.242.18 (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  s100 positive. 

message: May I draw your attention to this page?
http://www.circumstitions.com/Langerhans.html
twitter.com/jontycampbell (talk) 00:28, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Every new study?  On what possible basis do you say that?  I've just made a brief search of PubMed, and the vast majority of studies seem to agree that LCs facilitate HIV infection. Jakew (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Langerhans HIV transmission: conflicting studies 

message: The introduction states that LCs are "once thought to be a resident dendritic cell". Is "once thought" (in the past tense) meant to imply that they are now classified as some other type of cell? If so, what type and what is the source for this information?
The cited source appears to state that "Langerhans cells were the first dendritic cell to be described", so it is not clear that this implication is correct. Iaeen (talk) 13:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are LCs dendritic cells?
Talk:Râul Doamnei

message: "Upon reading the message, Vlad's wife became so frightened that she flung herself off the castle's tower and into the stream below the castle, preferring death to Turkish captivity."  I dislike the part that she "became so frightened."  Frightened of what?  To answer my own question, probably frightened of what the Turks would do to her after what their husband did to them.  But more broadly, frightened that she would become a dangerous liability to him and/or let him down and humiliate him by allowing herself to be captured by his vengeful enemies.  04:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Frightened"