Talk:2006 United States immigration reform protests

message: This has a lot of incorrect information. Many pieces of information are unsources, and some are outright incorrect. One article regarding the walkout in Las Vegas said that the grand majority of businesses suffered no impact, but this Wiki page stated they did. This part especially should be improved. Panfakes 13:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline

message: The following information is found on second link ( "The American Flag Comes Second" by Michelle Malkin, posted March 29, 2006 01:15 AM. Both accessed April 14, 2006.) 
 that references the photos information:
My name is Barry Schwartz, Activities Director at Montebello High School. I would like to correct the information on your web site. The students that took done the American flag and put up the Mexican flag were NOT from Montebello High School…they were from El Rancho High School (Pico Rivera) and from the Whittier area high schools (app. 800- 1000 students were involved). Our students were in class at this time. If it weren’t for these students, our students were not have left school...Our school is getting a bad rap…the Administration, Staff, and students do not condone this action.Dreday13 18:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An article cant be edited based on no source (you could be anyone pretending to be who you claim you are). If there is a verifiable media source of this that you can provide a link to, it will be changed. Panfakes 13:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Upside down flag caption has incorrect information

message: The forms in which numbers appear on this article needs to have a flow to it. For example, either express word notation (ex. seven-thousand) or express number notation (ex. 7,000). This is just for future reference for anybody who wants to edit and update this article. It may also recquire some clean-up. --EMC 01:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number Forms 

message: What connection should this article have to United States immigration debate and H.R. 4437? My feeling is that all text concerning legislation should be combined, especially if and when one of the bills is enacted.  The debate and protests should also be merged into one article, since the protests lack much meaning without the substance behind them.  An all-encompassing article would be reasonable, since the bills, the debate, and the protests are all closely linked.  Why make the reader jump from one article to two others, when a single article can tell the whole story? -Scottwiki 01:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the legislation passes, then this article and the "debate" article should be merged, as the debate is about the bill. If it doesn't pass then it should all be merged with the protests, which will be more significant than a failed bill. -Will Beback 21:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[2006 U.S. immigrant rights protests]], [[United States immigration debate]], and [[H.R. 4437]] 

message: Some countries such as Luxembourg, Japan, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia do not usually accept immigrants.  While the United States does, it takes decades for people to become citizens at the present.  I know many people who have been legal residents since the early 1990s and now  they don't even have a green card .  66.81.192.88 05:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What's your point?Cameron Nedland 01:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

text: What the hell are you talking about!?--143.92.1.33 11:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

text: How is that relevant to this article? --EMC 18:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Just because you can't tell the difference between a Japanese from a Chinese or Korean immigrant living among Japanese, doesn't mean Japan doesn't accept immigrants.  Even a gaijin can become a permanent citizen of Japan if you dedicate yourself to learning the language and culture (of course, that doesn't mean Japanese -people- will be friendly to you, but the point is the law isn't strict on immigrants like Saudi Arabia or Kuwait). --70.134.219.9 05:06, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, unlike most countries, immigrants are required to choose Japanized names (either entirely new names, or kanji renditions of their western names, such as Arudo Debito, fmly. David Aldwinkle) --Node 13:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toughest Immigration Laws in the World 

message: and was the first piece of legislation passed by a house of Congress in the United States immigration debate.
:This is rather odd.  Are we making the contention here that America has never had any public debate over immigration before the Bush Administration?  I'd think the Alien Act at least would count.
:If no one can provide a source for the startling claim that the "immigration debate" is so young, I'll be removing this as original research.  -Kasreyn 09:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First piece? 

message: In state law, a foreigner is out of state.  There are foreign insurers.  Alien insurers are say UK insurers -- Lloyds of London.  Lloyds of Lubbock Texas would be foreign in any state but Texas.  An immigrant is a citizen, while an alien could be a permanent resident (right to remain indefintely) or a tourist or a student or an illegal alien.  Technically there are no illegal immigrants except for all the reporters who don't know the legal terms. John wesley 14:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of the term Alien

message: Should the caption of the picture near the start of the article start "Thousands of stupid mexicans gather...", as well as including the words "illegal Gay Mexis" in the article? Sounds like it violates NPOV, as well as being racist.165.165.127.248 16:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This vandalism has been fixed. Kaldari 16:28, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption of the picture... 

message: The headline pretty much explains it all.--Jersey Devil 00:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please remember to expand references

message: In the intro sentence about the march I have removed the mostly hispanic statement and it's corresponding ref as unworkable. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 14:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro sentence 

message: It's unusual for the US Senate to work off a house bill directly on major legislation until they are ready to go to conference. So accordingly, there should be a companion Senate Bill number to cite. Joncnunn 16:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the Senate version is S.2454 --Rockero 21:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companion Senate Bill Number ?  

message: I suggest we move this article to a much more suiting title. Some of these protests aren't even about immigrants rights, yet they're included. This title is too narrow, and I feel needs to represent a more broad subject. --EMC 18:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "2006 illegal immigration protests", or for those who might think that's too much of a POV title, "2006 immigration protests". --EMC 19:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Don't forget to check out the "Name of Article" section on here, for it's relevant. --EMC 19:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the protests were over the reform proposals, I think that "2006 Immigration reform protests" would be an appropriate and NPOV title. They are not protesting illegal immigration, and they are not directly protesting for immigrant rights either. -Will Beback 20:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Since most of the involved editors on this topic have piped in , let's go with "2006 U.S. immigration reform protests" . Cheers, -Will Beback 22:13, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fine to me. Kaldari 00:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree. Please see my comments at Talk:Great American Boycott for more detail. -Harmil 20:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move/Merge 

message: I was wondering if someone following this issue closely could cite some financial statistics for the proposed law.  How many immigrants do they plan to have imprisoned for how long, and how much is all that going to cost?  How much do they expect the law to deter illegal immigration, and how much is that expected to save in tax money?  Mike Serfas 03:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the government were to actually enact such a law, the burden on the judicial system would be enormous. Imagine 12 million people trying to get jury trials at the same time. That's one of the main reasons why the Bush administration won't support it. Kaldari 05:16, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Financial statistics?

message: I think the article now has too many photos for its length. Not only is this visually distracting, I believe it turns a NPOV article into a pro-protest article by now looking (from a visual point of view) like a propaganda piece. Any thoughts on how many pics we should have? I liked having two pictures, with the Nashville picture being a great pic for the top of the page and any one other pic. Any thoughts on this?--Alabamaboy 17:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I don't particularly like the Salt Lake photo (featuring the back of someone's head). And the photo of the students should at least be moved down next to the paragraph about student walkouts. Kaldari 19:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many photos 

message: The intro says there were protests in 94 cities on April 10th. The timeline says 102 cities. Kaldari 06:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like someone resolved it, although the figure is still unreferenced. Kaldari 17:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory 

message: The thing I dont understand is why they dont go to Mexico city and demonstrate, and protest there.  I could really care less if all of those illeagal immigrants left.  Also, I completely agree with you Dudtz.
El bender 23:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that way stupid people like you will never find out. Do you see news from other countries than US? The idea of the protests is for YOU AMERICANS to notice the situations. Mexicans are informed enough so they don't need a protest. Besides there is no point on making a protest for a US law in Mexico. It surprises me how STUPID are you man.
Why the hell can't they make Mexico better,if you want to be American,go through the legal process.
Stupid preople say that "Mexicans take the jobs that we don't want",tell that to somone who lives in a place like, Flint Michigan . Dudtz 5/1/06 7:54 Pm EST
Completely agree with both. --CrazyAmerican 02:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

text: This talk page exists only to discuss how to make this article better, not to resolve political issues. Please find a different forum to offer opinions.  -Will Beback 02:30, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There should then be a link to a common forum to discuss these issues, so all wikipedians with words to say can be heard, and people like me, who are interested in hearing what people are saying, can go to. Having a million readers come to this talk page, do a random google for an even more random forum to speak on, doesn't bind us together well. Because this is not the right forum... where is? -Chewbacca 10:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Own Country??

message: "These actions were seen by some Americans as a sign of disrespect for both the flag and the United States.[13]"- That doesn't cut it. From what I've seen and heard, more than "some" Americans see this act as downright Treason, more than petty disrespect. I can understand waving a Mexican flag, sure, that's a protest. But hanging this country's flag upside-down, UNDER the Mexican flag? Sorry, but that's beyond disrespect. That's treasonous. If wikipedia is trying to document how people are reacting "currently," then 'some Americans' seeing it as 'a sign of disrespect' is too light a sprinkling of reality. People are pissed- don't leave out the truth, no matter how brutal it is. -Chewbacca 10:12, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd originally thought of using the words "most Americans" but I couldn't find any poll or other reference for this. I'd still support using the word "most" even without a reference.--Alabamaboy 17:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the word to "many Americans." If more people support going with "most," we can then make that change. Best, --Alabamaboy 17:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag Controversy 

message: I have found a California newspaper that has reported that a riot has taken place. Riot Reported During the May 1,2006 Demonstrations Where can this newspaper account be placed ? More reports of this nature will surface. Martial Law 23:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Riot]] Reported !!!!

message: I totally support the cause of the immigrants. However, adding this just took it too far:
"In 2006, millions of people were involved in protests over a proposed reform to existing United States immigration laws were massacered by a huge evil army run by the evil President Bush. Apparently failing to kill them with his hurricanes, he decided to do it outright with his private army that took the oil from Iraq."
Can we please make this part less biased? AllStarZ 17:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What the hell?

message: I've removed all instances of this word that I've been able to find, under Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy.  Loaded words are inappropriate in an encyclopedia.  Using "riot" implies the protestors started the fight, just as using "crackdown" would imply that law enforcement started the fight.  "Altercation" has no insinuation of which side was responsible for the violence.  The reader can follow the links to the news articles, and make their own decision as to who was responsible for the violence.  Kasreyn 17:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "riot" 

message: We should lock the topic soon. 209.221.73.5 18:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Locking the topic

message: Glenn Spencer is reporting that the Washington Post is reporting a backlash. One town no longer has a daylaborer center, two councilmen, mayor, all thrown out for being pro-illegal alien, and the states are reacting to the illegal aliens. More on www.americanpatrol.com RIGHT NOW. Martial Law 20:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.#2 article is Feds do nothing, States to deal with illegal aliens Martial Law 21:17, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Backlash

message: This section is out of control. People, this is NOT an organization. It's a blog of a single minuteman. His views do not represent the views of any single organization, and his calls to action do not have the capacity to mobilize hundreds, yet alone dozens of people on any action.
The only significant anti-illegal immigration organizations are  the Federation for American Immigration Reform, Center for Immigration Studies, and the Minuteman Project. 
I'm removing all the stupid other "organizations against illegal immigration" whose websites don't list a non-PO BOx address as contact address or list names of individual staff people or board members. --Yonghokim 04:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[2006 U.S. immigration reform protests#External links|External links]] 

message: First off, it's an overly long title.  Secondly, it implies that there are others who are in favor of illegal immigration (that is, in favor of law-breaking).  
The section is ridiculous and should be deleted.  They're not against illegal immigration, because illegal immigration is against the law.  A large majority of Americans are against illegal things.  That's how things become illegal:  a majority of us is against them.  Duh!  It's not illegal immigration they're against, Wiener and his ilk; it's immigration, pure and simple.  But, it's not appropriate for us to say that, since that would be POV and Original Research.  (Unless, of course, we could actually find a source citing Wiener saying he was against all immigration.)
So since our only options are to say something nonsensical (listing people who are against something most of us are against anyway) or to say something that violates NPOV (removing the "illegal" modifier), we really shouldn't have this list at all.  Does anyone object to my removing it?   Kasreyn 04:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk about speedy service!  Someone fixed it while I was typing.  But there remains POV stuff to be fixed.  Kasreyn 04:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "against illegal immigration" section makes no sense. 

message: As of 5-5-06, the Minutemen will hold a counterprotest all over the US, final stop will be in Washington, D.C. Source: FOX News. Martial Law 05:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All I caught was that the Minutemen are initiating a counterprotest and it will terminate in Washington D.C. Martial Law 06:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: As of...

message: This is from Prison Planet, a news blog: www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/040506violentinvasion.htm News Media Ordered NOT To Report Anything But "Peaceful Demonstrations". Santa Ana, CA Attacked in Bloody Riots, One County Employee SPEARED By Mexican Flag]. They charge that the "mainstream" media was ordered NOT to report anything other than "Peaceful Demonstrations", show a photo of a riot in progress, indicated that a person was assaulted, maybe killed by a illegal alien wielding a Mexican flag flying on a flagpole with a spearhead on it. Martial Law 07:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Where can this be placed ? Please don't harm the messenger. Martial Law 07:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I wouldn't place this info because it does not reference a known news source. As Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources says, "Personal websites and blogs should not be used as secondary sources. That is, they should not be used as sources of information about a person or topic other than the owner of the website." While there is some gray area with this (for example if the blog report in question ends up making news, which is why the article references some blog commentary because that commentary was later reported in the mainstream news media) in this case the blog reference should not be used. There is enough news coverage of this issue that we shouldn't have to violate this guideline. Best, --Alabamaboy 14:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The problem is, you mustn't use prisonplanet.com's descriptions when you add the link here.  It's not appropriate for a wikipedia link to bias readers by using loaded language and buying into the POV being pushed by a particular source.  I'm not saying we can't include a source that has a POV, but we cannot ascribe to that POV here.  So please stick to just the facts when titling a link.  Avoid using loaded words or words that assume the source is right.  The reader should have no barriers to deciding for themself who is right.  Kasreyn 17:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The person, who made the charges claims that the "mainstream" media" had covered up violent events, including, he says, the assault and/or murder of a county employee by a illegal alien, and states that the media is continuing to cover up these events. A check of the indicated city's news sources is in order. Martial Law 19:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh.  If you ask me, the mainstream media have a serious problem with overreporting and focusing on violence associated with protests in order to increase sensationalism and sell copy.  Violence sells ads, proven fact.  All too often, several hundred or thousand peaceful protestors are ignored by the news in favor of covering the ten idiots who showed up uninvited and started throwing rocks at cops, and later that evening the viewers are treated to footage of a "riot".  I'm guessing that's all it was.  So when I hear of a news agency directing its reporters to focus on the peaceful side of "assembling to petition the government for redress of grievances", I'm all for it.    Of course, if it really is a cover-up, which I doubt, then we should mention it if it can be properly sourced.  Kasreyn 19:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've checked the local media websites, and the closest I've found are that protesters have thrown rocks and bottles at police, protesters were arrested for refusing to follow police commands to disperse. Links are Rocks and Bottles thrown @ Police,Arrests In Santa Anna Following Rally,4 Protesters Arrested For Refusing To Disperse. Someone else may find more info. Martial Law 19:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job, thanks for looking it up!  :)  Kasreyn 19:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can someone place these news items in the article ? Martial Law 20:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protests Really VIOLENT

message: Go see Re.: Backlash. Martial Law 22:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Already found the source material depicting the town that removed its "daylabor center", two aldermen, its mayor, all for supporting illegal aliens, and the source that says that the states will now deal wih illegal aliens. Source is the Washington Post. This is in compliance to  the "" template. Martial Law 07:48, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re.Citation Needed

message: Sheriff Arpaio Goes After Illegal Aliens. Since this link is malfunctioning on Wikipedia, go to www.americanpatrol.com/"Fighting Back: Sheriff's Possee Goes After Illegals". Sheriff Joe Arpaio stated on 5-3-06, on CNN that he and his Posse will go after Illegal Aliens. Martial Law 08:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sherrif Joe Arpaio was featured on the CNN show Lou Dobbs Tonight on 5-3-06 when he said that he was going after illegal aliens. Martial Law 08:49, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Where can this be placed and can someone place this material ? Martial Law 08:51, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a election year. Maybe Sheriff Joe Arpaio is up for re-election. He got in on a "Get tough on crime" mandate, and a person who is in the U.S illegally is committing a crime. Martial Law 19:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You've got to see this link:Sheriff Enforces Law, Controversy Ensues. Martial Law 19:26, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Backlash Continues: Sheriff Arpaio Goes after Illegal Aliens

message: Usage within this article and in Wikipedia generally is inconsistent between undocumented immigrant, illegal immigrant, and illegal alien.  A central guideline should be adopted.  A proposed one, with different versions recommending "illegal" and "undocumented," is at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (immigration). Kalkin 18:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  terminology 

message: I merged this and redirected the article to this one. Most of the contents was here already. Mceder 17:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Gran Marcha]] complete

message: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/May_Day_March_For_Immigrant_Rights_LA
Just added a collection of 75 photos to the wikimedia commons from the big may day 2006 march in LA.
Feel free to use photos where and if appropriate. --Fluxaviator 00:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos from LA May 1st protests 

message: I was there. It may have been "economically insignificant", but it shouldn't be just minimized like that. It's undeniable that a huge number of people were there. I don't remember how many they were saying showed up, but it was standing room only, seas of people. At the very very very least 10,000 people, but almost for sure under 1,000,000 people. This needs to be added to the article, because the photos and video coverage of the event reflected a similar perception of a gigantic crowd. --Node 13:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phoenix mayday protest 

message: WILL there be an article for 2007 protests?
Maybe, are you gonna make one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.198.70 (talk) 01:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007

message: Now this article is deemed solved by this weird S.C. split ruling, no more problems with demos - The USA Supreme Court on June 16, 2008, per ponente Justice Kennedy ruled (5-4) "that someone who is here illegally may withdraw his voluntarily agreement to depart and continue to try to get approval to remain in the United States." The lawsuit is about 2 seemingly contradictory provisions of immigration law. One prevents deportation by voluntary departure from the country. The other sectition allows immigrants who are here illegally but whose circumstances changed to build their case to immigration officials, and must remain in the US. In the case, Samson Dada, a Nigerian citizen, overstayed beyond the expiration of his tourist visa in 1998. Immigration authorities ordered him to leave the country as he agreed to leave voluntarily, to allow his legal re-entry than if he had been deported.  supremecourtus.gov, Dada vs. Mukasey, No 06-1181, June 16, 2008 ap.google.com, Top court eases rules for foreigners to try to stay in US--Florentino floro (talk) 15:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Judicial legislation

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.katu.com/stories/85048.html
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:42, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:34:14, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/04/30/state/n072238D91.DTL
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:42, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:34:23, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/04/28/D8H94LTG0.html
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:42, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:34:35, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 3 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/b_anderson/05012006.htm
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:46, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:34:53, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 4 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0501boycott-econ-ON.html
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:46, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:34:55, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 5 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/28/060328144530.5qwylcsk.html
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:46, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:35:03, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 6 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.seattlepi.com/local/266257_rally11.html
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:42, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:35:56, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 7 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.thewakeupamericafoundation.com/000waf-events.shtml
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:42, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:36:20, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 8 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060327/NEWS01/603270355/-1/all
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:46, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:36:55, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 9 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://news.nacla.org/2007/05/09/the-anti-immigration-movement-from-shovels-to-suits
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:37:42, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 10 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_122200429.html
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-05-26 02:18:46, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:38:05, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 11 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://daywithoutanimmigrant.com
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-14 12:33:22, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In 2006 United States immigration reform protests on 2011-06-26 05:06:24, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:06, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 12 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2006 United States immigration reform protests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100429062712/http://www.laweekly.com:80/2006-03-30/news/stirring-the-other-l-a to http://www.laweekly.com/2006-03-30/news/stirring-the-other-l-a/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060513200820/http://www.kvbc.com:80/Global/story.asp?S=4848128 to http://www.kvbc.com/Global/story.asp?S=4848128
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2006 United States immigration reform protests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060902164711/http://www.kvoa.com:80/Global/story.asp?S=4755663 to http://kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?S=4755663&nav=HMO6HMaY
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060412170310/http://www.presstelegram.com:80/news/ci_3696093 to http://presstelegram.com/news/ci_3696093
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120316001803/http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_3697514 to http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_3697514
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060516221248/http://www.breitbart.com:80/news/2006/04/28/D8H94LTG0.html to http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/04/28/D8H94LTG0.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060920075948/http://daywithoutanimmigrant.com:80/ to http://daywithoutanimmigrant.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2006 United States immigration reform protests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081121112609/http://news.nacla.org/2007/05/09/the-anti-immigration-movement-from-shovels-to-suits/ to http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?section_id=9&screen=news&news_id=49693
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081121112609/http://news.nacla.org/2007/05/09/the-anti-immigration-movement-from-shovels-to-suits/ to http://news.nacla.org/2007/05/09/the-anti-immigration-movement-from-shovels-to-suits
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 2006 United States immigration reform protests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iFvCMGfUQz-s6KsYpvzkWlX8kbXwD91B7U500
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 2006 United States immigration reform protests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.whittierdailynews.com/search/ci_3661910
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060517234750/http://michellemalkin.com:80/archives/004869.htm to http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004869.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060412170310/http://presstelegram.com/news/ci_3696093 to http://presstelegram.com/news/ci_3696093
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://houstonist.com/2006/05/04/reagan_hs_princ.php
*Added  tag to http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20060402/NEWS09/604020379/Iowa%5C-s-future-linked-to-fate-of-immigration
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Anastasia192 (talk) 18:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Links 

message: Anastasia192 (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 2006 United States immigration reform protests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nshp.org/?q=node%2F1574
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://houstonist.com/2006/05/04/reagan_hs_princ.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=local&id=4040574
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nevadaappeal.com/article/20060328/NEWS/103280055%26SearchID%3D73241356192303
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fn%2Fa%2F2006%2F04%2F30%2Fstate%2Fn072238D91.DTL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060812030901/http://aad.english.ucsb.edu/immigration.html to http://aad.english.ucsb.edu/immigration.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929090019/http://www.spokesmanreview.com/breaking/story.asp?id=6369 to http://www.spokesmanreview.com/breaking/story.asp?id=6369
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: — Assignment last updated by Crodriguez2023 (talk) 17:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adding Immigrants Quantitative Sources for Latino Immigration History