Talk:Bharti Airtel

message: I have moved most of the content regarding Airtel in Africa, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka to their dedicated pages (ie, Airtel Africa, Airtel Lanka, Airtel Bangla)    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mushroom9 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Airtel Content Moved

message: I think Walmart is going to tie-up with the parent Bharti Enterprises and not with Bharti Airtel. Any references? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Natrajdr (talk • contribs) 08:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walmart Tie-up 

message: The links for Aegis School of Management were clearly an attempt to advertise the private educational institute's programs related to telecommunications, and may not be directly related to Bharti Airtel. 
More appropriate links to be added in the "additional links" section may be links to competition, links to sites of group companies, sister concerns, holding companies and so on..
But then, why not? AirTel spams you seventeen times a day, so we can always spam this blog, right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.199.61 (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please do not add unrelated links to the page

message: I suggest merging the two.
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:11, 4 March 2009 (UT
It's arbitrary whether Bharti is third or fourth largest mobile carrier. China Mobile and China Unicom are ahead, and Vodafone has 200M across several countries. So I deleted the ranking. I also deleted the awards section, because several were imprecise and others belonged elsewhere (e.g. on Mittal's personal page.) I'd welcome someone restoring a more carefully edited collection of directly relevant awards. DaveBurstein (talk) 10:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge (Lanka) 

message: Please, semi protect this article because some specific user (user IP 122.160.10.8) is using Wikipedia's platform to abuse Bharti Airtel. And even after reverting this edit many times, same is undid again and again by him/her. --Wiki.Gunjan (talk) 09:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I've had to undo the the vandalism as well. It's best to semi-protect the article to prevent future vandalism. --Tary123 (talk) 10:23, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If its a single user, then maybe we should deal with the user and avoid protection. Has the IP been warned or educated about correct procedures? -- — Keithbob • Talk •  15:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to 'Semi-Protect' the article. 

message: Hi, I've read this article ages ago, and all number figures for subscriber base, etc. used to link to a government body that publishes a report every quarter. Currently, I'm shocked to find that most of the references point to some random blog called telecomtalk.info, which doesn't seem to fulfill WP:RS. Requesting assistance from other editors to look into this, as I don't have the time to clean up the entire article. aJCfreak yAk 05:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  TelecomTalk.Info sources 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/Airtel-asked-to-pay-Rs-1L-to-online-fraud-victim-for-negligence/articleshow/45997271.cms. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 07:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Click the link for more information, Thanks.
https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqSQgKIkNDQklTTERvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoOGFIV1EyTldkdk9IVjBRWGR6VUhGaFRXVk9WemxtZUc5aWJsWTFRMkpOS0FBUAE?q=airtel&lr=English&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio2ZqqouvbAhWTxIMKHUisDMQQqgIIOjAD&hl=en-CA&gl=CA&ceid=CA:en  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.141.139.141 (talk) 05:31, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A New Controversy 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Per RM.  I suggest start another RM on your proposal (closed by non-admin page mover) Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 14:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Bharti Airtel →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. We normally use the doing business as name, rather than the formal, long name. Kailash29792 (talk)  11:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 November 2021