Talk:Tunes of Glory

message: :Image:Tunes of glory76.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Tunes of glory76.jpg

message: Some of the copy refers to the military organization involved first as a regiment and then as a battalion.
At some point in the film, one senior officer wants to pass on a matter "to brigade," which, hierarchically is the next higher level in the-then table of military organization, after regiment; battalion is one LOWER. 
The ranking officers are correct for a regiment which is almost always commanded by a Lt. Colonel which is precisely the rank that the John Mills character has; a brigade commander would generally be a full colonel while a battalion commander is generally a major.
I'd have to sit through the movie again and I gave it away to a now ex-girlfriend!
24.193.135.93 (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Pat. Four battalions make a brigade. A regiment is not an operational unit. It is the entity that recruits and deploys men to its various battalions, which may reach double figures in time of war. Valetude (talk) 23:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think we may be talking at cross purposes, you appear to be confirming the point I was making.  I was never disputing that during WW2 the number of battalions in a regiment could rise substantially. PatGallacher (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regiment Or Battalion? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tunes of Glory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724022628/http://www.ltdb.co.uk/node/16800 to http://www.ltdb.co.uk/node/16800
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Jock's conversation with [Major Charlie] Scott is mentioned as if we know who the latter is. I do, and OP clearly does, but the casual reader doesn't, cos Scott has not been previously mentioned in the article. Guyal of Sfere (talk) 20:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. I've fixed that. Tobyhoward (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinclair and Scott talking at 3am