lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Handelsbanken

message: This article seems like a brochure at some sections.. Would anyone with better judging skills then me take a look? 85.145.53.201 (talk) 10:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.handelsbanken.com/shb/INeT/IStartSv.nsf/FrameSet?OpenView&id=IDnav_About_the_group&iddef=aboutthegroup&navid=Investor_Relations_En&sa=/Shb/Inet/ICentSv.nsf/Default/qF0547EAEE37862B5C12575EB00411872; subpages of the official history. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: There is an absence of specific information about the banking services offered in each market, and the clientele of the bank (eg what criteria must be met in order for a person or business to be accepted as a new client).   Could someone who knows where to find this information add this to the article to help make it more complete?   Thanks.   FreeFlow99 (talk) 10:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banking services and clientele
Talk:Jeff Kenna

message: Any idea where he is going to??????
Jeff has registered  himself as a player for galway united and he might be playing next friday 18th of july  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnbrennan06 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Thelema

message: Is Thelema a category of Magick, or is Magick a category of Thelema?  Right now the two categories loop back on themselves.  This isn't a huge problem, but I don't think it upholds Wikipedia standards, either. --Geoff Capp 11:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thelema is a religion with a system of magic. SynthesiseD 17:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, philosophically; but I was speaking in much more practical terms.  In geek-speak, my question is: Should :Category:Thelema subclass :Category:Magick or vice versa?  It is awkward, at least, for them to subclass each other recursively as they do now. --Geoff Capp 13:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a difficult decision, but I would have to say that magic would be a subclass of Thelema because without the religon itself there is no Thelemic magic, so the existence of thelemic magic is dependant upon the existence of the thelemic religon. You wouldn't have Hinduism as a subclass of Yoga, in the same way Thelema should not be a subclass of Thelemic magic. SynthesiseD
Simple answer: 'Magick' is an eccentric synonym for 'ceremonial magic'; Thelema is a religion which promotes the later. Not all ceremonial magic is Thelema, Thus, :Category:Ceremonial magic is an element of :Category:Thelema. And :Category:Magick redirects to :Category:Ceremonial magic. But :Category:Thelema should also be a subcat of :Category:Ceremonial magic. It's a case of T includes CM, and T is also a type of CM. I don't think this should be considered a problem. Skyerise (talk) 20:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Template talk:National anthems of the world

message: Hi, thanks for visiting!  All the national anthem fans out there, if you can help build this template by adding national anthems from the List of national anthems, that would be great.  This job is too big for any one editor.  Cheers,  Badagnani 11:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New template

message: Where did "Fanoghe Chamorro" come from for Guam?  The List of national anthems page says it's "Stand Ye Guamanians."  Badagnani 13:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guam 

message: I just added the Republic of China (Taiwan) but I am unsure whether it should be alphabetized as C or T. (Template:Nationalanthemsofasia alphabetizes as C.)--Jusjih 06:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Use common name. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 20:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan 

message: List of national anthems is now its own article again, and not a redirect to List of anthems by country. This template should be added to the base of each individual national anthem article that it features - please help in doing this, and in completing the template by adding nations from List of national anthems (which needs help completing itself!) --Matt Lewis (talk) 02:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of national anthems]]
Talk:Daniel MacPherson

message: SOMEONE fIX DIS PAGE UP ITZ ALL WEIRD N STUFF —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.132.132.87 (talk • contribs) 12:13, June 21, 2006
Or to put it into English, it's basically a fan page at the moment and needs Wikifying. Smurfmeister (talk) 15:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Ok,the wiki gods decided to censor a previous comment; an over-reaction to say the least as I was only trying to promote some dialog on this page. Im sorry if I offended the all powerful wiki gods, but I did comment in the discussion section of the page and if we cant say what we think here, then what the hell is it for!
Ok, now for my comment, the article reads like it was ripped off a fan page or written by MacPherson himself!  I mean, can we please add some honesty to this article because at the moment its an embarrassment.  Can we at least state that he is human, because the authors write about him as if hes a christ like figure...and before you ask me to re-write it, think twice, because in my view it needs a total re-do.  I will leave it to the current authors to edit this hack job.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdog6666 (talk • contribs) 09:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Searches
Template talk:Everton F.C. squad

message: ; Background
* User_talk:SenorKristobbal#Everton_F.C._squad_template
* User_talk:Veila#squad_template
I'm having to keep reverting because the edits being made are causing breakage across every page that includes the template. This is happening because I converted the template to use fb start/end templates and did the requisite work to convert every page that included the Everton F.C. squad template.
SK has argued that the template is now non-standard as per other EPL squad templates (18 + Everton at the moment). The earliest squad template that I can find is the Arsenal one, from which all others seem to have been aped. It is my contention that the Arsenal template (and all subsequent derived works) are non standard and the Everton F.C. squad template is now the only standard squad infobox as per the WikiProject Football efforts at infobox standardisation (somewhere between 1000 and 1500 pages use this method at the moment).
Further, the version that SK has twice reverted to is broken in and of itself. It has a broken link which should point to the Everton F.C. page, Van der Meyde is being miscapitalised as per "normal" usage described in Van (Dutch) and the Lescott link is being suffixed with a | incorrectly due to a misunderstanding of the way the template works. In short, it's a bad revert.
It also leads to the creation of a nonsensical Wikitable when the fb start and end templates are being expanded around a version that already incorporates the opening and closing components of a table. To reiterate, it breaks every page it's included on.
Now, SK is, of course, most welcome to make edits to the template, but edits are different to reactionary reverts. SK, if you really want the box to be bigger, read the code and try increasing the font-size parameter from 80% to something higher. I can certainly appreciate that the template is short of perfection; for starters, the size of the first and last cells in the banner are different, the flag could use a border but that left aligns the image for some reason and if somebody can find a way to remove the |} after Lescott (displayed only on the template page, not currently showing on pages that include the template) without introducing an extra  at the bottom of the box, that would also be great. ⁂veila# 11:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: fb start/end

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Football_%28soccer%29_navigational_boxes_%28standardized%29
Note how no football squads are listed.
Checked several countries  England, Germany, Holland, Australia. No Club teams use this fb template so neither should Everton 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Football_squad_templates The Wikiproject football is simply not ready to work on squad templates as it squashes them making them too tall. If you are confident that it is, please edit all of the squad templates English or otherwise (club teams AND National teams) although you will get people reverting them due to the described squashing.
SenorKristobbal 15:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  standard?
Wikipedia talk:German userbox solution/Babel box straw poll

message: All controversial boxes should be migrated into userspace.
This is the minimun idea for resolving the userbox issue.
===Support===
#CharonX/talk 11:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial boxes 

message: #CharonX/talk 11:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: all but the babel boxes should be migrated.
Pro: we get rid of ambiguity and possible grounds for discussions or deletions.
Con: we migrate more userboxes than really necessary.
===Support===
#CharonX/talk 11:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial and Non-Controversial non-Babel boxes 

message: #CharonX/talk 11:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: All boxes should be migrated.
Pro: we have no more ambiguity.
Con: we might break some inofficial conventions where to find babel boxes, babel boxes should never be controversial.
===Support===
===Oppose===
#CharonX/talk 11:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  All boxes 

message: #CharonX/talk 11:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose
Talk:Zoroastrianism in Azerbaijan

message: i consider this as a important subject for azerbaijan, i think we should also work on other minorities in azerbaijan to represent them well to the world, we azeris love our minority brothers and we should work on these. i know the basic things about zoroastrianism in azerbaijan but i need some help to make this a good article Karabakh 11:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be also working on this article and perhaps the members of WikiProject Zoroastrianism would also be interessed Baku87 08:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  start 

message: I removed "in search of religion tolerance". No Iranian Zoroasterian is in search of tolerance in Azerbaijan. The otherway around is most likely, but I have no interest in adding such information. 2. The number of Zoroasterian should not be included for the reason that we simply do not know.--Xashaiar (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  my edit
Talk:Microsoft Flight Simulator X

message: August 26, 2017
I admit I don't know much about editing Wikipedia articles, so if I get this wrong please have mercy.
Some years ago I wrote an article about using FSX efficiently.  The article concentrates on the computer interface, with the idea being that if newbies to FSX can learn that interface quickly and easily they can spend more time flying the plane.  As you will see if you read the article, I originally wrote these tables and their explanations only for myself.
The question is whether a link to my article should appear on this Wikipedia page about FSX.  I don't make any money or anything if more people go there, but I have heard from many readers over the years that it's useful.
Another question, which does stray into the content at a URL as opposed to the Wikipedia article about FSX, is what I can do to improve that page.
The URL is http://barelybad.com/FSX/FSXintro.htm.
If that page is worth being linked to from this Wikipedia article about FSX, where should it be placed?  Do I do it myself or should someone else do it?
WalteregoWik (talk) 17:12, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled section 
Talk:Earl of Kenmare

message: I'm writing an article on Thomas Browne, 4th Viscount Kenmare, who according to this page is the 6th Baronet Browne. However, my source, the 2004 edition of the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, claims "Thomas Browne's great-grandfather, Sir Valentine Browne, second baronet, had been created first Viscount Kenmare by James II in March 1689." In this page he is the third baronet. Either the ODNB is wrong, or this page needs to be renumbered, and one of the Brownes needs to be removed. Can anyone shed further light on the subject? ubiquity 11:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found some sources that agreed with the original contributor. Apparently the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography is confused on this subject.ubiquity 04:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict with Oxford Dictionary of National Biography article
Talk:Welfare-to-work

message: This page is simply wrong. There is no "welfare-to-work" program in the U.S. per se. That is a principle applied in some welfare programs, including TANF, which is still in effect. This page should just be deleted. Yyyikes (talk) 20:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

message: This program, like workfare, was blasted as being racist. I didn't know W2W ended, but I know Workfare is still around, though it doesn't seem to generate as much fire anymore. Anyone have ideas on why this was racist, why other people DIDN'T think it was racist, etc.? Curious. 216.165.126.116 (talk) 10:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  racist?
Talk:London Underground 1995 Stock

message: Please see the discussion on Talk:London Underground 1996 Stock, as well as p13 and p15 of London Underground's official rolling stock guide , re the traction control systems on the two train types. In short, the 1995 stock is *newer* in traction control design terms than the 1996 stock, despite the nominal dates carried by both train types.--Stalinism 12:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not got time right now, but i'll be updating the info surrounding build and commissioning dates, also the differences to the Jubilee stock, which are in fact significant.  Rather, tho only common parts are the floor extrusion, carbody doors and mechanism and shoegear.  Everything else is different to some degree...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jubileebloke (talk • contribs) 14:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm, generally OK but a few additions needed 

message: Apparently certain 1995TS trains are being upgraded with a new series of DVA announcements, as seen here  and here . I'm looking into adding it to the article. Brooks630 (talk) 23:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't really encyclopedic, and YouTube is not what we call a reliable source. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CIS Upgrade 

message: Battersea Branch started the service on 2021. 
Station Opening:
*Nine Elms - September 2021
*Battersea Power - September 2021
*Clapham Junction - December 2025.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.142.79 (talk) 11:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Extension Of Northern Line's Battersea Branch
Talk:Papa Smurf

message: What's his name in French? Please, help!
:His name in French is "Grand Schtroumpf". 128.230.13.64 18:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The article says a quotation is needed for his age. From what I recall, it's mentioned in The flute with 6 smurfs, the first story where the smurfs appeared. In the Swedish translation he gives his age as "542 chanterelle years" or something like that, and says the other smurfs are all a hundred years old. It's been ages since I read it, though, so I could very well be mistaken. 62.181.255.64 10:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papa Smurf's age 

message: There's a flashback episode where a much younger Papa, sports a brown mustache & beard (he's seen leading his 'minor aged' Smurfs). GoodDay (talk) 23:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Younger Papa Smurf

message: In an episode of the venture bros, 21 and 24 debate whether or not smurfs lay eggs.  21 uses the argument that smurfs are mammals because papa smurf has a beard.--67.86.120.246 (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They can't be mammals, since they only have one gender. Smurfette was created by Gargamel through black magic. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 17:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venture bros 

message: Copy edit completed for the contents of this article as of today. Happy to revisit on request, if needed. RuthLivingstone (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Edit
Talk:Kuleli Military High School

message: ==Article==
The first military high school in Turkey is Naval Military High School established in 1773.Now its facilities in Halki(Heybeliada)/Istanbul
Answer From FZK:  Naval School founded In 1773, it was not Naval Military High School. In Ottoman education system first "High Schools" (İdadi) was established in the middle of 1940's. So how can we say there is a high school in 1773? Naval School was called as "Naval Military High School" in 1928, first time. Before it was Naval School that contains Naval Military Academy.
==GS==
The first high school of Turkey is the Galatasaray high school, or as it is called, lycée.
Est. 1481  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.0.48 (talk) 12:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: The first high school of Turkey is the Galatasaray high school, or as it is called, lycée.
Est. 1481  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.0.48 (talk) 12:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GS
Talk:Eastwood, Strathclyde

message: The article duplicates a lot of detail also presented in East Renfrewshire (UK Parliament constituency) and Eastwood (Scottish Parliament constituency). Seems to me an article more about the historic local government district, at Eastwood, Strathclyde or Eastwood, Scotland, would be a better idea, with the existing article as a redirect to which ever. Laurel Bush 12:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article better as a redirect to a new article?
Talk:Slammiversary (2005)

message: I took the time to go through the DVD and get accurate timings for all match decisions, using the DVD player's timer (I use Cyberlink PowerDVD 7.0).  The following is a running diagram.  The preshow match is based on the timing for the Preshow feature title.  The others are based on the timing for the DVD's main title.  Matches are timed from the opening bell to the final bell.  Multiple-fall matches have mid-term falls counted at the strike of three. --Kitch 12:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Timing

message: This is not the 3rd Slammiversary  ppv event in the chronological series.  This is the very first Slammiversary PPV put on by TNA Wrestling, LLC.  They even acknowledged it on their own website at one point.  The chronology for all TNA Slammiversary PPV articles needs to be edited to reflect the correct number.  Here's the correct chronology below.
* Slammiversary 2005 = 1st Slammiverasry ppv event
* Slammiversary 2006 = 2nd Slammiversary ppv event
* Slammiversary 2007 (aka Slammiversary V) = 3rd Slammiversary ppv event
* Slammiversary 2008 = 4th Slammiversary ppv event
* Slammiversary 2009 (aka Slammiversary Seven) = 5th Slammiversary ppv event
* Slammiversary 2010 (aka Slammiversary VIII) = 6th Slammiversary ppv event
* Slammiversary 2011 (aka Slammiversary IX) = 7th Slammiversary ppv event
* Slammiversary 2012 (aka Slammiversary X) = 8th Slammiversary ppv event
* Slammiversary 2013 (aka Slammiversary XI) = 9th Slammiversary ppv event  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.17.116.135 (talk) 04:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slammiversary Chronology
Talk:Glasgow Rutherglen (Scottish Parliament constituency)

message: Content now under Geography, population and politics seems a bit 'out of focus' for a constituency article. Is it about a burgh '500 years older than Glasgow', a Westminster constituency created in 1918 (and now abolished - or replaced by a new constituency)? A Scottish Parliament constituency created in 1999? Or what? If I had more local knowledge of the area I might be able to make more sense of this content. As it is the content seems more confusing than helpful. Laurel Bush 12:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography, population and politics 

message: I note removal of reference to Renfrewshire. The Govan Holyrood constituency was created in 1999 with the boundaries of the Govan Westminster constituency. In 1999, and until 2005 (when the Westminster constituency was replaced with new constituencies), the Westminster constituency did include part of Renfrewhire, and, at present, the Holyrood constituency is unchanged, retaining the boundaries it had when created. See The 5th Periodical Report of the Boundary Commission for Scotland, which details 2005 changes to boundaries of Westminster constituencies, and shows pre 2005 Glasgow Govan covering part of Renfrewshire. Laurel Bush 10:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundaries
Talk:Paleocollapse

message: I am starting a new article.  I draft right on the wiki, so it will take a few days to settle down. --Zeizmic 12:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Carapintadas

message: This sentence I am having trouble understanding the meaning of it. Isn't captured and arrested almost the same? Gadig 12:57, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not exactly. Arrested means they were charged with a crime. Captured is like sized, they got control of their actions (stopped the uprising) but doesn't mean neither imprisonment nor further charges. Mariano(t/c) 13:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya mean seized, right? Taragüí @ 17:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Er, well, they were big... Mariano(t/c) 09:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Seized means detener in Spanish. I think that is a better word than captured Gadig 21:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: They were captured, but two were arrested
Talk:Return of the Living Dead 3

message: The zombies in the original movie ran.  Only those missing legs limped or shuffled.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.232.122.104 (talk) 08:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Running Zombies