lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:An Incomplete History of the Art of Funerary Violin

message: Did anyone apart from folk who are a little slow on the uptake actually believe this was a work of non-fiction? Did no-one actually spot that the book was not categorised as fiction or non-fiction on the jacket? Did no warning bells ring when the narrative encompassed the Shakespearean authorship question, an alleged purge of violinists conducted by the Vatican, and the true origin of Springheeled Jack? People this dense don't deserve to be able to read. Garrick92 12:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Hoax"? ...!

message: I re-added a notability tag removed by another user without explanation.  There are many books and many not notable.    The content and refs hee do not establish notabilty.  Please do not delete the tag without any discussion or article improvements. --Fremte (talk) 17:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notabilty 

message: I believe this article is complete. Any objections to removing the stub template? — tbc (talk) 04:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a stub 

message: It's on YouTube under the artist, The Guild of Funerary Violinists! — tbc (talk) 04:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hear the music! 

message: Per Rocklopedia Fakebandica, Sarah Singleton borrowed the idea in her 2009 novel. — tbc (talk) 04:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entered culture in 2009
Talk:His Story

message: That's a Colin Hay cameo, right where Elliot and Carla is at the bar, right? --abach 05:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Colin Hay cameo?

message: When Cox is talking to his Therapist about having to go to Jordans family for a couple weeks (or whatever time period) the therapist says "And I'm sure you told her to 'blow it out her ass'". In the comedy central re-airing he says "And I'm sure you told her to 'blow it out --- ---'" with the "her ass" bought just muted out. Any idea why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.226.119.201 (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censored on Comedy Central
Talk:An Introduction to Old Norse

message: Really, the book exists, but this is dubious "wikipedianism", and the stub is POV as well. Cheers Io 22:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't have thought this counts as POV: "This book is commonly accepted as a standard text for any student studying Old Norse".  It has, in my experience, enjoyed the status of a standard textbook, and has thus, for some time, played an important role in the teaching of Old Norse in the English-speaking world; this isn't the writer of the article offering their  own opinion about the book's worth. Whether that qualifies it for inclusion, I don't know. I've read that at least some of the illustrations are the work of JRR Tolkien; if we could find confirmation, might that add notability? And would it make the article less advert-like to mention other textbooks and Old Norse teaching aids which cover similar ground? Perhaps it would help if we could find some reviews worth quoting which would testify to the book's status and give some idea of how people view its merits relative to other textbooks and learning aids which now exist. Or does that run the risk of making the article itself too much like a review? Dependent Variable 02:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this an advertisement?
Talk:An Urchin in the Storm

message: I removed the list of books Gould reviewed in this book here. I would have hoped that my edit summary ("Removed bullet pointed list. There is no need to list every book reviewed. The list should be replaced with a summary of the book's contents, in prose") explained this fully. However, an editor reverted me here with the comment, "if there is no point in listing the contents of an anthology of book reviews, there is no need for an article at all". That comment seems to reflect a simple failure to understand that the purpose of an article is to describe and explain important facts about its topic. If reliable sources have singled out some of Gould's reviews for special mention, then by all means let's mention them, and expain why they were important; that's what a properly written article would do. Listing each and every book reviewed, simply because it was reviewed, and without giving further explanation of why the book was reviewed or why the review matters, is feeding readers trivia. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The book is a collection of book reviews.  The subject books were reviewed because someone asked the author to review them.  There is not, and likely will never be, any reliable evidence about why these specific reviews were commissioned from this specific author, other than the obvious facts that Gould was a paleontologist and well-known in New York literary circles.  What you are proposing is a recipe for a perma-stub which will never say anything about the book beyond reciting bibliographic information that can be trivially looked up in any number of databases.  121a0012 (talk) 15:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What nonsense. Gould's book will of course have been reviewed, and it ought to be a relatively simple matter to look up those reviews (such as Michiko Kakutani's, which rather contradicts your claim that the book should be seen simply as a collection of book reviews) and summarize them in the article. That is the way the article should be written. Or do you think that the article should be nothing but a list of the books it reviewed, with nothing to give it context or significance? FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 00:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "Nothing but"?  By no means.  But it should include at least the minimal information on what this book is about.  Just as any article about a record album will include listings of the tracks and the personnel performing, an article about a collection of book reviews is plainly incomplete without a listing of the books reviewed.  Have Robert Silvers and the other magazine editors ever published an explanation of why they commissioned Gould to write these reviews?  I don't think so, but am willing to be proved wrong.  121a0012 (talk) 03:41, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think a book can be compared to an album. But restore the list of reviews if you want to; I'm not interested in edit warring over this. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of book reviews
Talk:Ancient Society

message: Because editors have made their own selections and comments about the meaning of Morgan's important work, this article is a collection of OR.  It needs sources from reliable, third-party published works, preferably academic ones, ABOUT Morgan's work, according to WIKI policies.Parkwells (talk) 17:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, hello Parkwells. I see you discovered us here. I did significant work on it some time ago but then I got off onto other things and never got back to it. Subsequently others showed an interest, but not a serious interest. So, it remained in an unfinished state. Actually this is a target of mine, mainly for its influence on the work on the better known archaeologists. But, I felt the other Morgan article should be in shape before I got back to this. I haven't changed that plan, but, there is no telling exactly when I can get back to this. This is an early editing effort on my part. It isn't up to my later standards. I see you have got a start on critiquing it. Fine. I do have one comment on your comment above. We have to distinguish between interpretation, your "meaning of Morgan's important work" and summary. While you are right about the interpretation, the summary is not in that category. We can do summary; we do it all the time. A WP article IS a summary of the main points of the topic. You do not need a third party to tell you what Morgan said under a certain topic. For example, if Morgan talks extensively about progress, I do not need a third party to tell us Morgan talks extensively about progress. If that is the view you are taking we shall not agree. If we were to follow that view, we could never say that Morgan said anything, only that someone else said he said anything. WP would be only hearsay. But, I will not know the exact implementation of those words until this is under my magnifying glass. Right now I have NO idea what the subsequent editors have said nor am I ready to take a look. One thing I do not want to happen is for me to get distracted from my line of thought and get lost in a morass of argument and other articles. So, be patient. There is lot's of other editing to do around here, or maybe you want to work on the format and content of THIS article in addition to criticism. Then I can criticize you when I do.Dave (talk) 06:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: OR - Original research

message: Some editors have added comments in their footnotes, which are unsourced and OPED opinions, per WIKI policy. These have been deleted.Parkwells (talk) 17:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: OPED
Talk:Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints

message: Unless there is specific information that individual  vols in this series are particularly notable, I would oppose individual listings for them. Holdings are irrelevant, as most academic libraries subscribe to the whole set. It's like individual periodical issues.  I'm not going to renom, but I would have opposed if i had seen it in time. DGG (talk) 03:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "opposing viewpoints" notability
Talk:Annales Alamannici

message: This article definitely needs more description. After reading the article, I am still left with the question "...but what are they?" Sverre (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: The image shows the manuscript in latin, for translation see :
*709. Hard winter. Duke Gottfried died.
*710. Hard year and deficient in crops.
*711.
*712. Flood everywhere.
*713.
*714. Pippin, mayor of the palace died.
*715.
*716.
*717.
*718. Charles devastated the Saxon with great destruction.
*719.
etc. "notable for their short, cursory style and limited narrative", yeah :-) --Atlasowa (talk) 10:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation latin to english for years 709 to 719
Talk:Armenians in Poland

message: No notice was placed here that this image has been nominated for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 23:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Other images used on this page may also have been nominated -- please check them all by clicking on them to see if there is a deletion notification on the image page.  If there is, use the link that takes you to "this image's entry" to comment on the nomination for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 01:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image nominated for deletion

message: MAybe someone would like to clip a painting of an Armenian from this 17th century Polish painting. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Australian rules football in Catalonia

message: Shouldn't this be part of the Australian rules football in Spain article?Hack 05:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication 

message: I think I originally made it part of the Spain article, I think personally the two should be merged.  AaronRichard 13:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreement 

message: Scotland, Wales and England have separate articles. Catalonia has an own league, so I think it's correct to have an own article. 83.50.183.204 18:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Like Scotland, Wales, ...
Talk:Lee Stern

message: The following is unsourced material:
* Stern and his wife Norma led the 1983 St. Patrick's Parade in Chicago
* Stern played a significant role in the 1994 FIFA World Cup matches staged in Chicago.
* Stern maintains an interest in sport as a part owner of the Chicago White Sox Major League Baseball American League franchise.
* Stern has ten grandchildren: Michael, Jill, Scott, David, Adam, Samson, Alexa, Danielle, Rachel, and Michelle.
Once this information can be sourced, please feel free to reincorporate it into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 02:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced info 
Talk:Anno Domini 2000, or, Woman's Destiny

message: I have removed the following section from the page. There is no mention of any such work in the catalogues of either of the libraries and the claim is entirely unreferenced. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Content removal 

message: Here is a list of some reputable sources that can be used to expand and add references to this article. 
# https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/photo/anno-domini-2000
# https://teara.govt.nz/en/zoomify/33186/anno-domini-2000
# https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/49207 (The book itself)
Dracophyllum 02:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Since its creation, this article has stated the Hilda Fitzherbert holds the role of "Imperial Prime Minister". Having read the text of the Gutenberg ebook, the Google Books scan of the third edition and the text of ebook at the Victoria University of Wellington, I can find no mention of her holding this role. 
When first introduced (p. 37) she is described as "a young woman of about twenty-three years " and "Under-Secretary of State for Home Affairs" in the Federal Parliament (parliament of the British Empire). After thwarting an insurrection led by Lord Reginald Paramatta (pp.159-162), Emperor Albert plans to make her a countess (p.170). Later after becoming fabulously wealthy, she is made Duchess of New Zealand and becomes "Lord President of the Board of Education" (p.216). Later still, she marries the Emperor and becomes Empress (p.305). 
At no point, that I can see does Hilda Fitzherbert become Imperial Prime Minister. Throughout this whole period the Imperial Prime Minister is Mrs Hardinge (introduced as such, p. 47). Later, in the Epilogue, Lady Cairo is mentioned as having succeeded her as Prime Minister (p.315) at some point after Hilda becomes Empress.
This statement that Hilda Fitzherbert is "the young and charismatic Prime Minister of New Zealand" appears repeatedly in the blurb on booksellers websites for the Mint Editions version of the book (e.g. Google, Barnes & Noble, Foyles, Amazon), but she does not have that role in the book either. DavidCane (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imperial Prime Minister?
Talk:Khwaja Salimullah

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Although this external site is also a user-contributed encyclopedia, its contents are not offered under a license compatible with the GNU Free Documentation license, but are protected under copyright by the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. This archived version, linked above, clearly predates the inclusion of the material in this article.
Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: What if nawab salimullah wasnt from Dhaka? 202.47.42.161 (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question
Talk:Terkel in Trouble

message: Since this is a danish movie, it would only make sense. What are the official Wikipedia guidelines concerning these sort of things? Lordz 15:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the names be in danish? 

message: I happen to come from Denmark, and even though it is enjoyed by adults, I don't think this film is considdered an adult film. The kind of humor written my Matthesen for this movie doesn't differ from what he wrote (and performed) for the main children program in Danish Public Radio. What sources claim this is an adult animation? My suspicion is that it's simply an American biased judgement, since the level of violence and politically incorrect humor allowed in Scandinavian and the US children and young adult programming differs substantially. 77.212.64.36 (talk) 12:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adult animation?
Talk:Vibrate (The Manhattan Transfer album)

message: In 1958 Sarah Vaughan and the Count Basie Orchestra recorded a version of Doodlin', with the lyrics used by The Manhattan Transfer.  The original version of Doodlin' was purely instrumental.  Horace Silver did not write the lyrics and The Manhattan Transfer did not credit the author of the lyrics.  
Breedentials (talk) 09:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncredited Lyrics to Doodlin' 
Talk:Phospho soda

message: To me it looks like this article needs some work on the facts.  A discussion here suggests it isn't quite right.  The fact that dosing is given as "3 oz." makes me suspicious.  Even in the US, I have the impression mg dosing is more typical. Nephron  T|C 06:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at http://www.phosphosoda.com/consumers/products/phosphosoda.aspx for picture and dosage of 1.5 fl oz.  It is taken normally in two doses about six to twelve hours apart for a total dose of 3 fl oz. --- Safemariner 00:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To

message: In the News recently:  http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090121/laxative_lawsuit_090121/20090121?hub=Health. The suit: http://www.classaction.ca/content/actions/phospho_soda.asp   Also, http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2008/NEW01923.html along with http://www.canadianpharmacistsletter.com/(S(2d2gu0ukt222ifqrm5i2xtbn))/pl/ArticleDD.aspx?nidchk=1&cs=&s=PLC&pt=6&dd=250123  --137.186.226.218 (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Info to be incorporated
Talk:C. K. McClatchy High School

message: This an article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources and citations. IAW with the quality scale, it is rated Start, Low. --Morenooso (talk) 19:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rating re-assessed

message: I'm a teacher at CKM; I changed the vice principals and the rival school.  Sacramento High School no longer exists in an official sense, having been converted to an independent charter school, and the official Rival of CKM is now [John F. Kennedy High School (Sacramento, California)].  The Vice Principal changes can be verified at the school's website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.150.239.39 (talk) 00:55, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: I would like to add the school is commonly known and abbreviated as 'CKM'. The colors are listed as cardinal, white and grey. As an alumni and according to the school's webiste the designated colors are cardinal and white, no grey. The updated enrollment is 2,285 vs. what wiki says it was in 2016-2017. Also, aside from over fifty clubs C.K Mcclatchy has studying abroad opportunities as well as Visual and Performing Arts programs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catalinaelira (talk • contribs) 03:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 

message: In the history portion the website states, " Currently, approximately 2,000 students attend the school. " this needs to be updated. https://ckm.scusd.edu/history-ckm  
Catalinaelira (talk) 03:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 

message: Christian Brothers High School Sacramento was founded in 1876. 2600:1700:7BE0:AED0:447F:3E3D:9729:AF24 (talk) 01:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest High School in Sacramento CBHS 1876
Talk:Multi-chip module

message: I have a couple of issues with the opening paragraph:
# Mentioning the term "chiplet." It irks me the source is another wiki that's editable by anyone.
# Enough mentioning of Intel and AMD makes it feel like there's a bias towards those two companies pioneering the manufacturing paradigm, even though MCM manufacturing has been around for decades as noted by the examples.
ShuffyIosys (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph issues 
Talk:Gianduja (chocolate)

message: If gelato originated in Italy and the combination of chocolate and hazelnut also originated in Italy then how can you claim that "The chocolate hazelnut gelato of the same name originates in Switzerland."  That's kind of out in leftfield (actually rightfield in an obscure corner)... Stevenmitchell 06:29, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gianduja Gelato 

message: Attention, please: consider reading with attention http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianduja 
Gianduja comes from "Gioann dla doja" - in italian: Giovanni del boccale - that is: John the pottering man, if you prefer), because the piedmontese character likes to drink very much. Note that in the Italian Wikipedia this one is the only correct meaning, as the name of the character. And pay attention that at http://pms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giandoja , the piedmontese wikipedia, the only correct meaning is Gioan dla duja. By the way, it's the same at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianduja_(commedia_dell%27arte) 
Sorry for my bad english... :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.21.216.222 (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Giandla duja" is also Piedmontese for the hazelnut "giandula", and "giandulott" is the kernel of drupes. The English translation into "sweet nut" hits the original description of the Albese dialect meaning, and the terms gianda, gandula, gandulin and gandulott are well known throughout the areas of Gallo-Italic parlance.
It had been marked as unsourced since 2010; since it appears to be false, I have removed it.  (Text higher up, giving the etymology from commedia dell'arte, remains.)  If there is controversy (or even an interesting coincidence) in the etymology of ‘gianduja’, then by all means restore this material, but with citations and NPOV.  —Toby Bartels (talk) 18:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The meaning of Gianduja 

message: The Nutella page states "An older recipe, Gianduja, was a mixture containing approximately 50% almond and/or hazelnut paste and 50% chocolate."
This page says approximately 30% hazelnut paste.
173.8.81.41 (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  30% or 50%? 
Talk:Amber (song)

message: I can't be the only one that thinks this, but does anyone notice how the vocals sound a lot like Pat Monahan from Train? The very first time I heard this song, I seriously thought it was Train who sang it, until I found out otherwise. This could be notable for inclusion in the article, but do not know if there are any reliable sources for this to merit inclusion outside of a music forum, which, from my understanding is not a reliable source since it's user generated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moline1 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pat Monahan
Talk:Vic Ghezzi

message: Original subtext in the main description included the following: (Birth year sometimes listed as 1911 or 1912). This was removed due to conflicting information as his birth year was already listed as October 19, 1910. Feel free to add it back if you can include sources stating that his birth year information is listed as 1911 or 1912. Vermilion bubble (talk) 14:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed subtext