lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John A. McClernand

message: Looking for a source for this quote:
:Having already had several horses shot from under him during the fighting, the general was again on horseback with an aide holding his horse's reins when a Rebel bullet severed the reins. "This is getting damned annoying," McClernand reportedly exclaimed.
Anyone know it? -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 06:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If McClernand had a new bride in 1863, she can't have been the same one who gave birth to his son Edward in 1848. Only one wife (Sarah) is mentioned in the article, and she is described as the daughter of James Dunlap, another Union General. The link goes to a different James Dunlap, who died many years before. I can find no record of a Union General called Dunlap. 86.179.62.95 (talk) 14:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that quote from Winters because it made no sense. He was married once, in 1842. I have clarified James Dunlap. You are correct that the link was wrong. He is listed in List of American Civil War brevet Generals (Union), but no one has written an article about him yet. Thank you for catching the discrepancy. Hal Jespersen (talk) 16:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twice married? 

message: 'Grant, after receiving the opinion of Admiral David Dixon Porter and General Sherman that McClernand was unfit...' Does this refer to his health, or to his 'unfitness' for command through insubordination? 86.148.132.157 (talk) 11:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. In looking over this article, which I have not read for a long time, I see a lot of unreferenced material. I have removed my name from the maintainers list at the top of the talk page because I do not have time to fix it. Hal Jespersen (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfit? 

message: McClernand claimed that he saved the day at Shiloh, because he kept his brigade on the alert, when the others had been told to rest easy. I don't know if this is confirmed. 86.148.132.157 (talk) 11:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can provide some secondary sources for this assertion, we (or you) can include it. Hal Jespersen (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shiloh
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Car Buyer's Bill of Rights

message: Hi, This is TriStarMotors. I was trying to add alot of information that I have on my websites to Wikipedia. 
Apparenetly I ahve angered alot of you. I will try to conform to your likings. Not all of us use wikipedia all day. I was not trying to spam thank you. Please email me tristarmotors@gmail.com and help me get this info up there!
:The information on your websites appears to be primarily advertisements for your commercial course offerings. What little content there is apart from that is too specific to California law to be useful to a worldwide community. Fan-1967 18:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Treasury of Atreus

message: Treasury or Treasure of Atreus? I am familiar with the naming "Treasury" but have not seen it referred to as the treasure of Atreus. I think this may be a mistranslation from the commonly encountered Greek "Θησαυρός του Ατρέα" which literally translates to Treasury of Atreus. Anyone else have an opinion? I am not technically wikiliterate enough to make the name change myself whatever the outcome.  --5telios 13:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: So, was it built c 1250 or in the 16th C BCE?  The first 2 paragraphs have both assertions. Albiart (talk) 18:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: the same Question I would ask also when I come to this side -- Hartmann Schedel (talk) 15:04, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: The article could use some more information in regards to the structure of the building. There is nothing mentioning the relieving triangle above the lintel, which is included to funnel the weight/pressure of the building off the lintel and into the sides of the structure. --RobertTidona (talk) 05:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: — Assignment last updated by Mpalomo1 (talk) 22:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Architectural History
Talk:Tomb of Nefertari

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 10:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 February 2022
Talk:Tasty Snax

message: Is there a particular reason this article is so incredibly biased as to be stupid? I'd fix it myself if I knew enough about TS... Hello2112 18:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a copyvio from some critic to me. --Foot Dragoon 04:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Yep. --Foot Dragoon 05:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Kipper Kids

message: It is not clear from this stub why Brian Routh is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. See WP:BIO for inclusion criteria. In particular, it is not clear to me why "The Kipper Kids" is significant enough to make B.R. notable.
Please expand the article and explain notability, preferably by adding independent reliable sources.
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 09:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: I don't think there is enough about Harry Kipper to justify a separate page. filceolaire (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Harry Kipper]] into this 

message: Is von Haselberg's role in the 2019 Bob Dylan film not notable? He plays Stefan van Dorp, the fictional filmmaker. 
Anyone competent to edit and follow Wikipedia rules might like to add this?
https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-news/rolling-thunder-revue-bob-dylan-story-doc-whats-fake-847231/
2A00:23C5:B382:B301:704A:6063:EA5A:A8F8 (talk) 22:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling Thunder
Talk:Joyce Blair

message: The link on the text New Look went to a page about the fashion style, and disambiguation didn't reveal anything about the TV programme. It can go back if the show gets its own page. Jon Rob 12:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faulty Link 

message: says she recorded the single "Christine" using the pseudonym "Miss X" as a reference to the Profumo Affair. Does anyone have better refernces for this and wants to add it?
--87.174.70.148 (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christine - Miss X
Talk:Prince Christoph of Hesse

message: "died in an airplane accident in the Apennines in 1943". Which unit was he serving in at the time? JCScaliger 18:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Overall think people who revert the edits are interested in Wikialty (something is true because I can get other Users to agree to it) then the actual informative content of the articles relating the Kassel branch of the former ruling house of Hesse, but if all interested, overall issue under way at Talk:William VIII, Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel Cladeal832 (talk) 04:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Request
Talk:Brian Stack (comedian)

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations
Talk:John William Atkinson

message: Danger359 18:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

message: :There are few obits in WP written this way - if you have some examples please post them. I'll fix a few things while I'm here. Cheers Clappingsimon talk 20:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ticket lock

message: The reason there are no references cited is because I wrote this page from my own independent derivation of ticket locks; I figured them out from scratch, and then discovered they already existed (invented in 1991). Toby Douglass 16:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you know they were invented in 1991? Whatever you found that said that, couldn't you use that as a reference? --68.0.124.33 (talk) 04:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: referencing

message: I have absolutely no idea what this article is about, other than that I can (barely) infer that it's computer-based. 24.250.218.248 (talk) 08:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: Why is it mentioned that this is atomic? It doesn't have to be, as the lock holder is the only one who can increment it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.120.46.160 (talk) 22:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atomic increment of now_serving
Talk:Explosion of the RFA Bedenham

message: An anonymous user has recently been changing all references to the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) Bedenham to NAV Bedenham. Now, I don't really know all that much about Naval terms, however, all of the book references I used to create this article refer to it as the RFA Bedenham, as does the BBC. Given this, and the fact that the anonymous user gives no references of explanation for his changes, I've been forced to revert. If there is a reasoning and verifiable references for this change, please post them before changing again. Robotforaday 18:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RFA or NAV?
Talk:The Honor of the Queen

message: After reading the end of the synopsis of this book, I got my copy out and looked at the end of it.  I do not see where it says about the Alliance occupying Masada.  Is this is a later book and I missed the passage? Cosumel (talk) 13:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Masada Occupation? 

message: I'm not certain how much more notable this article should be—it's about the second novel in a major science fiction author's most successful series.—DocWatson42 (talk) 05:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding notability 

message: The table with the battle participants and results is especially surprising.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aadieu (talk • contribs) 17:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did whoever wrote the article actually READ the book?! 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Anglosaxoncelt

message: I notice that wikipedia is considering the term "English" as a cultural definition for some cultural project or other, and I am making comments at that site which I think you should start taking more seriously. I am not "English", even though I tick off the census box in Canada that says I am English to prevent anyone from thinking I am French. It is a political decision which is made in respect to funding in Canada. Like I said, in the title page of the 'Anglosaxoncelt' the DNA project is defining this term, and you people at wikipedia have to take it more seriously. You are dismissing me without doing any genuine research. I believe this whole designation of "English" as a culture seems to be politically motivated.  If you delete 'Anglosaxoncelt' then you also have to delete 'English' from the wikipedia cultural project.  Millions upon millions upon millions of people are of anglosaxoncelt descent because of the intermarriage within the UK, Ireland and the rest of the world. I know, because I am an anglosaxoncelt,  Many of my ancesters were anglo/saxons, many more celts.  I have Taylor, Beardsell, Toombs and MacGillivary in my ancestral line starting right at the grandparents.  I think people from England may be having too much input into this discussion; it's politically motivated, and I do think you truly have to take me more seriously.  Most so-called "English" north Americans have a mingling of their lineage.  Few are pure celtic or anglo/saxon, meaning virtually none are English.  When we say we are English we are referring to the language, not our blood.  The 'English' page at wikipedia is mistakenly assuming that we are of 'English' blood.  I am shocked that you would so quickly propose such an important word as anglosaxoncelt for deletion without doing even a moment of research.
: The word "angosaxoncelt" does not exist in common usage anywhere in the world.  Whikipedia is not a place for original research.  See WP:OR. Geoffrey Spear 20:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Central Organization of Trade Unions (Kenya)

message: somebody should do something to help totals stations customer attendants esp in kajiado total  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.49.88.102 (talk) 19:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Kuwait Trade Union Federation

message: I think more information is needed:
*on the number of workers represented by the KTUF
*on the history of the KTUF
*on the controversies of the KTUF
*on the work of the KTUF for/with migrant workers
Jananteeni (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this still be considered a stub?
Talk:Kari Mannerla

message: I took out that he designed Inkan Aarre "in his last years" since here http://www.yle.fi/teema/tiede/keksinnot/keksinnot_mannerla.shtml it says (in Finnish) that Afrikan tähti was his last game and that the others were designed earlier. 88.192.34.13 14:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:18th century BC in architecture

message: the temple arose from fallen ashes of the clentintenal fLash drive.  Once born among the washington's covenant rule the mighty king De-ont'e.  His mother Shaunketa was risen from sweet manification.  tuhbuhlarh (tube-u-lar) was the aincent greek pharroh that rose up against him and stole his royal staff so that he may rule as the hermafridite of the new age.  Stlandesh was the moment, velinatra was the hour.  ask yourself this question-stick your hand in a hamesock? or die by the sword. we shall not remain oppresed by the radical facist of the wiki-tube!!! Subscribe to bomdinger magaizine...a magaizine that shan't go unnamed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcuscrsby (talk • contribs) 12:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  architecture
Talk:Free Trade Union Confederation of Latvia

message: A better translation is Free Trade Union Confederation of Latvia, which is also the version used on the organisation's own website. The current name sounds like they're a bunch of neo-liberal proponents of free trade. —Zalktis (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done —Zalktis (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?
Talk:List of The Ricky Gervais Show episodes

message: Anyone else feel this article would be better off as an article for the podcasts and XFM episodes? It'd be great as a definitive encyclopedia article, and there's already a few places we can get the information straight from. Dav 18:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  XFM 

message: I would add them myself but i don't know how to format. One is the one given away on the series 1 cd and of course the new fame podcast  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.19.13.65 (talk) 11:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: two more podcasts

message: Should the NME one-off show be listed? Lots of information at http://www.pilkipedia.co.uk/wiki/index.php?title=NME_Radio_Show  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.25.109.195 (talk) 10:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NME one-off show 
Talk:Agrostemma githago

message: Are corncocles the "tares" of the Bible?
Not as far as I can tell: I've found two web sites that say "tares" are a kind of vetch and three web sites that say "tares" are darnel. I've seen no other candidates offered. And since corn cockle is a red flower, it would seem to be easily separated from wheat, unlike darnel which apparently resembles wheat. Philippachaucer (talk) 16:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

message: The article states: "All parts of the plant are reported to be poisonous." Well, is it, or is it not? 84.160.251.180 20:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poisonous? 

message: "Rare flower is rediscovered - but touch it at your peril."
Article in The Times. Wednesday 16th July 2014 p.22.Osborne 18:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Newspaper article.

message: Have tried to rearrange: Description, Ecology etc. However something is wrong!!! Help please.Osborne 21:01, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rearrange
Talk:Malta Workers' Union

message: I have never heard about the UHM being referred as the Malta Workers Union, but always by its name Union Ħaddiema Maqgħudin.
Kindly advise what is the wikipedia policy on Maltese names. Maltesedog 06:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there is a differentiated naming policy for Maltese names. I used the English translation as per Wikipedia:Naming conventions. --Bookandcoffee 15:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Maltese names
Talk:Forum Boarium

message: Shouldn't the Temple of Matuta and the Matralia be mentioned here?--The Lesser Merlin (talk) 07:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stoa of Attalos

message: Here and online, I cannot find answers to several important questions about the reconstruction.
How much of the original remained in 1950?
Is the reconstruction on the same site?
:A different site?
:What happened to the remains of the original?
Where did the materials come from?
:The original quarries?
Why did Greece agree to this?
:This question is germane only if the original was replaced.
Nick Beeson (talk) 13:11, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconstruction 

message: Clearly the original building was not just in ruins, it had been destroyed and a wall built on the site. That would have rendered an accurate rebuilding virtually impossible. I would therefore question the statement that the reconstruction was "important in the study of ancient monuments because the reconstruction of 1952–1956 faithfully replicates the original building". Even if it faithfully replicated the original, which is unlikely, why would that be important in the study of ancient monuments?122.59.167.152 (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconstruction or replica 

message: Can we remove the fotopedia link as it seems to be going to a dead URL now?
Murfman (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove fotopedia link?
Talk:BF model

message: someone (please!) must complete this sentence to achieve a better significance: 
"...The action
:S=\int_M K[\mathbf{B}\wedge \mathbf{F}]
where K is an invariant nondegenerate bilinear form over \mathfrak{g} (if G is semisimple, the Killing form will do) and F is the curvature form
:\mathbf{F}\equiv d\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{A}\wedge \mathbf{A}
..."
thanks--kiddo 18:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete
Talk:Mario Faustinelli

message: The Kolosso (character) page has been an unsourced orphan for years, and it contains very little content. I suggest redirecting it to this page and expanding the sentence about Kolosso to be more descriptive. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one objected, I performed the merger. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Category talk:War crimes in the Yugoslav Wars

message: I noticed that a number of battles of the Yugoslav Wars have subcategories of this category, but a lot of others don't. What is the rule here, shouldn't these be placed on a specific page dealing with a massacre? Since almost every battle was followed with a war crime, we can add them almost everywhere. Tezwoo (talk) 22:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to place the category?
Talk:Ashes of Victory

message: Would anybody know if that refers to Frank J. Ney? Debresser (talk) 10:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuckerization 

message: She didn't receive a battlefield promotion; rather, when she was on the Republic of Haven prison planet, she was an admiral in the Grayson navy, but had a lower rank in the Manticore navy, and emphasized her Grayson rank due to certain potential problems in her chain of command... AnonMoos (talk) 21:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "battlefield promotion"
Talk:Ben & Jason

message: I cannot find the notability requirements for these artists.  We need some sort of links for independent verification, and to confirm their participation with a major label, or having hit a chart, or something. - CobaltBlueTony 18:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this now be split into two articles? I came to the Ben & Jason page redirected from the link to Jason Hazeley from Listen Against, and in that context it seems odd to reach a page concerning a defunct music duo. I expect the same would be true of anyone following links to Ben Parker.--Pelago (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split into Ben Parker and Janson Hazeley articles
Talk:Gerda Christian

message: I think there is a mistake on the bunker template, according the Der Untergang movie, she left the bunker with Traudl Junge
You shouldn't use movie as a source as movies are usually inaccurate. I think that's already corrected, but a problem, which repeats in the English Wikipedia is number of Hitler's secretaries. In this article it's claimed "Gerda Christian... was one of the three private secretaries of Adolf Hitler..." . Johanna Wolf, Gerda Christian, Traudl Junge and Christa Schröder were all Hitler's secretaries. That equals four secretaries. Plus Martin Bormann, who's title was private secretary (in addition to his title as Chief of the Parteikanzlei). So, was Bormann the fifth private secretary of Adolf Hitler? Also Rudolf Hess acted as Hitler's private secretary in 1920's. Was he the sixth? --Ukas (talk) 00:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What happened after she was captured by the Soviets on May 2nd? Valetude (talk) 10:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was she released?
Talk:At All Costs (Weber novel)

message: Is the birth of her child not significant enough to rate a mention? Mdotley 02:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. A son and a daughter, actually. Mazeltov. Go ahead and add! That's what Wikipedia is all about. Debresser (talk) 13:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son? 

message: Anyone have source for David Weber's comments?  Citation Needed!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Libwolf (talk • contribs) 00:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hamish's remark was intended as a joking insult, and Honor reacted to it appropriately in the book. The joke comes from the reversal. -Arch dude (talk) 07:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  trivia 

message: This novel has no reviews listed at ISFDb. Ping User:Cunard, User:Daranios... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Cunard Thanks, borderline with three capsules and a fanzine? For now I'll add sources exist to the article but I am not sure if removing notability template is justified. Very borderline... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Robert H. Milroy

message: There were added some time ago about six pararaphs by a single editor that were extremely critical of Milroy which in and of itself is not bad.  However there were some very specific claims that were not supported by online citations.  These section were marked back in May by another editor as "citation needed", but nothing has been provided ad there has been no discussion on this page concernng the citation questions. I have removed those sections until appropriate ctations are provided. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 01:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 14, 2007 Edits