lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:United Airlines

message: I noticed that the Accidents and incidents section is formatted into a table. Most pages for airlines usually have it in the format of a few paragraphs, or a table with specific information for each incident. Should the section in this article be changed? Sethcampbell7293 (talk) 16:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed it the other day along with a few other pages. I'm changing the way the Accidents and incidents for every airline is represented. The new way is cleaner and more organized. It also redirects to a separate category list for more in depth detail on the incidents. Funforme3 (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidents and incidents 

message: What happened to the list of destinations table it's been deleted? CHCBOY (talk) 14:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please bring back the UA destinations list. There is no other website that provided such a comprehensive and complete listing of United’s destinations, not even United.com! 2601:640:8300:1900:20A0:C63C:897D:6F71 (talk) 01:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

text: This was discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United Airlines destinations, the result of the discussion was to delete the page. If you disagree, you may request a deletion review. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 03:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not obvious that the article was about to be deleted as there was no mention of it on the actual page header. Most people don't know where AFD are located on Wikipedia. So it ended up being deleted quietly overnight for most people. CHCBOY (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destinations table  

message: In the See also section, please add:
* 
which renders:
*  136.54.106.120 (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: I don't think this makes for an useful external link. First, this isn't actually an external link, second, this link is already in the "Legal and public relations" section of the "United Airlines Holdings" Navbox, which is a better location for links to articles within Wikipedia. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2024
Talk:Joe Hill (activist)

message: I apologize if I'm doing this incorrectly, but the above topic suggests that any further discussion should be added as a separate post on the talk page. In terms of cultural relevance the following is an important footnote for the prominence of the Organizer Joe Hill. 
here is a selection of songs titled "Joe Hill" about the aforementioned Organizer:
Joe Hill - We Have Fed You All For a Thousand Years - Utah Phillips
Joe Hill - If I Had a Hammer: Songs of Hope and Struggle - Peet Seeger
Joe Hill - The Collector's Paul Robeson - Paul Robeson
Joe Hill - The Internationale - Billy Bragg
Joe Hill - Carry it On - Joan Baez
Joe Hill - The Collection - Luke Kelly
I Dreamed I Saw Joe Hill Last Night - Union Town - Tom Morello: The Nightwatchman
Joe Hill - Four Friends Live - The High Kings
Joe Hill - Revolution - The Dubliners
This is only a small selection of the songs bearing the name of the Organizer Joe Hill, and it seems that in terms of cultural relevance having a sizable number of culturally significant musicians having a rendition of "I Dreamt I Saw Joe Hill Last Night" signifies that the Organizer has a significant historical importance. 
There is also an editorial perspective that could be viewed as significant. The labor movement in the United States is often a footnote in US history education. Raising an author over an important figure of that movement plays into the political, and cultural forces trying to suppress knowledge about the history of the labor movement in the United States.  Spicygarbage (talk) 08:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia's "editorial perspective" is a neutral point of view, so it isn't our place to promote anyone over anyone else. There are a bunch of people and other subjects named "Joe Hill"... standard Wikipedia procedure in that case is to disambiguate them all somehow with different article titles, and put a list of them at "Joe Hill". The only exceptions to this are when one subject "is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term."(WP:PT1) That isn't the case here... in fact, Joe Hill (writer) gets substantially more traffic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonAQuest (talk • contribs) 12:47, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Per Above, Joe Hill (Organizer) Prominence
Talk:Becan

message: Source: Visit to the site and INAH information: While there are seven causeways over the trench that give access to the city, the idea they were once filled it with water (still reported by Mayanists) to provide a moat has to give way to the geographical structure of the region. Becán sits on porous limestone rock well above the water table, and the trench shows no signs of being sealed or connected to any canal. The Maya probably planted thorn bushes at the bottom to dissuade intruders. 
The photo captioned 'within the moat' is misleading. It looks to me to be the passageway that leads from the main plaza towards one of the causeways. ññññ richard crosfield.
: Very good point.  The notion of a water-filled moat is obviously a product of rooting a conceptualization in medeival european castles, and without a linkage to a canal or river (which, as far as I remember, did not exist), the moat would never receive enough water to fill it and could never hope to retain it if it did.  I've only been to Becan once (5 years ago) and don't recollect the moat itself, so I can't comment on the photo being misleading. -- Oaxaca dan 16:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The moat at Becan and the photo 'within the moat' and the diagram showing a moat are not correct.
Talk:Phoenix Television

message: The Chinese characters in the pic [Image:1043031531_10.jpg] means "China News Network"(?). I don't know if that's copyright violation? --Yacht 05:08, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this sentence should be deleted or qualified:
:Many Phoenix programmes are designed for the interest of mainland and Taiwan audiences, Hong Kong people are generally less interested in political news.
What do others think? --Ghormax 21:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not possible that people are not interested in politic.  That's like saying people aren't interested in national sports.  There will always be people who are interested in whatever.  24.89.245.62 22:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: Most of texts in this article are violating copyright. Visit http://www.phoenixtv.com/phoenixtv/77405618595430400/index.shtml --JSH-alive talk to mesee my worksmail to me 10:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CopyVio! 

message: Feel free to visit my user page to preview the vectorised logo that may replace those in this article. I'm open to suggestions (since I'm new here). Hytar 20:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SVG logo available 

message: I just changed Liu's name in the Ownership section to "Liu Changle".
I don't have much Chinese-English transliteration experience, and "Liu Chang Le" looks better to my American English eyes, but the contracted form seems to be preferred in Mr. Liu's case.  See for instance:
http://news.ifeng.com/phoenixtv/77412215665197056/20070604/908208.shtml
"Liu Changle, born in Shanghai in 1951, is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Phoenix Satellite Television."
Also, if it becomes an issue that needs fixing, consider that there are other pages that might refer to Liu, such as Rupert Murdoch.
Peter Kaminski (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Liu Changle" vs. "Liu Chang Le" 

message: I think merely redirecting ifeng.com here is insufficient. The company appears to have a vast web and mobile presence which goes far beyond being a promotional site for their conventional TV channels. Hopefully someone can expand. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[ifeng.com]]

message: To add to this article: information about Phoenix Television war correspondent Lu Yuguang (卢宇光) being caught presenting footage of a burned-out car from Canada as the purported wreckage of a U.S. HIMARS missile launcher in October 2022. 76.190.213.189 (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Smithfield, London

message: The article says tata swindlers  and coin forgers were executed by boiling at Smithfield. I think this method of execution in England was only in force for poisoners, and even then only between 1531-1546. Elsewhere in Europe I believe forgers were subjected to the penalty under the Holy Roman Empire, but not in England. 185.76.230.249 (talk) 13:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boiling Alive
Talk:Bedlam

message: I moved the article from Bedlam to Bethlem Royal Hospital and put a redirect to it at Bedlam
as per the quote from http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirect
"In accordance with wikipedia:naming conventions (precision) it's best to have an article at a well-defined, unambiguous term, with redirects from looser colloquial terms, rather than vice versa."
Steeev 08:00am 20 Nov 2003 UTC
:Agreed that the article on "Bethlem Royal Hospital" should be at "Bethlem Royal Hospital".
:"Bedlam" redirect turned into disambiguation page for the numerous other meanings of "Bedlam".
:—Lowellian (reply) 05:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Lowellian, I don't agree with this move. "Bedlam" is known as the word for the old hospital, and/or for the chaos associated with it. It should be redirected to the hospital, or ideally a separate article should be written for the history of the hospital, but it shouldn't be the title of the disambig page. SlimVirgin TALK contribs 03:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Slim. The hospital is the original and primary use.--Cúchullain t/c 01:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to restore the original redirect. SlimVirgin TALK contribs 22:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved

message: Keith, if you want pages to be moved, please be explicit, because this is already a mess. If you look at the history of Bedlam, it has been moved around enough already. Simple redirects seem to make most sense now. SlimVirgin TALK contribs 23:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the move as it was done by a cut and paste method which destroys the attribution. I would have expected any move back to this title would have been done by a move. Keith D (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the history of Bedlam, it has been a redirect, an article, and a disambiguation page, so I would say the history's already messed up. I think it's best to stick to a simple redirect. I can't think where it would be moved to now that would make the history make sense. SlimVirgin TALK contribs 01:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The page history was not a mess until your cut-and-paste move, which is against Wikipedia policy. Even if you had consensus that "Bedlam" should be a redirect rather than a disambiguation page (and you did not, as both User:Steev and I have expressed opposition), you should have moved this disambiguation page ("Bedlam") over to the disambiguation position ("Bedlam (disambiguation)") to preserve the page history and then created a redirect at "Bedlam", instead of doing a cut-and-paste move that separated the page history and as User:Keith D stated, destroyed the attribution. I've reverted the cut-and-paste move. —Lowellian (reply) 18:13, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page moves
Talk:Japanese American Internment/Archive 1

message: I read or heard a few days ago -- from where I couldn't remember -- that a high percentage of the interned were Nisei. Any stat on that? --Menchi 06:27, Jul 31, 2003 (UTC)
:IIRC it was 2/3 but that percentage, of course, went down as more Sansei were born in camp. --mav 08:08, 31 Jul 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Second-Generation
Talk:Shastra

message: I don't think that the definition is correct. I think that Shastra means an art/ craft/ technical/ practical or professional knowledge, not knowledge in the general sense- Artha Shastra, Vastu Shastra, etc., KRS 09:16, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *The Unification of Wisdom and Compassion Dr. Yutang Lin
Dr. Yutang Lin says here: "Parallel to the Heart Sutra, I have written an article entitled "The Heart of Sublimation through Limitless-Oneness Compassion Sastra." Because it has been written by me, not something given by Buddha, it cannot be called a "Sutra"; it is called a "Sastra." In Buddhism, Buddhists are allowed to offer their theses as long as they are consistent with the Sutras, and those are called "Sastras."
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.69.213 (talk) 09:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: -- 88.75.92.199 (talk) 21:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: http://lionsroar.name/tantric_glossary.htm
"shastra (S): A treatise upon or exposition of a sutra; a Mahayana texts that expounds the meaning of the sutra or group of sutras. The Indian Mahayana schools grew from an attempt to systemasize the teachings of two groups of sutras. The Madhyamaka school clarifed and categorized the Prajnaparamita (Perfection of Wisdom) sutras, while the Yogacarin school did the same for the "idealist" sutras, the earliest being the Samdhi-nirmocana (c. 2nd c.) and later the Lankavatara (4th c.). A number of the shastras are traditionally attributed to Maitreya, as received by Asanga, founder of the Yogacarin school. These texts include the Uttaratantra Shastra (Ratnagotravibhaga-mahayana-uttaratantra-shastra, or "Analysis of the Jewel Matrix, Supreme Tantra of the Universal Vehicle." Other shastras attributed to Asanga include the Madhyantavibhaga, Mahayanasutra-lamkara, and the Abhisamaya-lamkara. These and shastras attributed to his brother Vasubhandu would be preserved, mostly in Tibet, but also in China where they would influence the doctine of the Fa-hsiang, or Chinese Yogacarin school.
Both Yogacarin and Madhayamaka shastras were transmitted to China, largely due to the efforts of Central-Asian scholar/translator Kumarajiva. Several Indian Buddhist schools were entirely transplanted to China with their Indian form more or less intact, including Kumarajiva’s "Three-Shastra School," based on Madhyamaka shastras by Nagarjuna and Aryadeva and a Yogacarin shastra by Vasubhandu.
1.Madhyamaka Shastra
2.Dvadashamukha Shastra
3.Shatika Shastra: 100 verses, 32 words each. By Vasubhandu.
The Satyasiddhi Shastra, written by Harivarman and translated by Kumarajiva,was the text upon which on which the Hinayana Satyasiddhi sect based its doctrine. It was a Hinayana variation of the Sunyata (emptiness) doctrine. The term is defined as perfectly establishing the real meaning of the Sutras."
,some of it to be inserted within the article's page.
: -- 188.102.31.118 (talk) 13:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some additional information
Talk:Hertz doctrine

message: Hearst Doctrine???  You've got me smiling!  I assume you must have meant the Hertz Doctrine if you were trying to invoke the car-rental competitor to Avis...  A google search shows the more common of the two coinings totals all of 6 references -- policy wonks have been slow to adopt the phrase for some strange reason....  one possibility I'll throw out there is the risk that the lawyers at Hertz Corporation might take a dim view of associating their trademark with the Bush Administration strategy for world-domination...  there is no question the Hertz corporate marketing folks will be horrified, if only because the tagline for Hertz is not "We're Number One" but the decidely less unilateral "Suddenly, you're free again"... 
 :) technopilgrim 10:15, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Henry Lucas (politician)

message: Caution: In this article I have assumed that the Henry Lucas who founded the Henry Lucas Charity was the same Henry Lucas that founded the Lucasian Professorship, because in both cases a benefactor of that name died in England in the same year.  There is a small chance that they were two different men. -- Heron 14:35, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: They are the same person (assuming that Cambridge didn't have two MPs of the same name at the same time).--Henrygb 22:21, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Diet Library

message: Could someone explain exactly what a 'Diet' is in this context, please? Having realised it's not about weight loss, I don't want to add a European definition of Diet. DJ Clayworth 16:40, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Triangle

message: 7 years ago I found out these triangles that were made of prime numbers as its three angles.  There is only six of them and they look like shards.  They are made of the prime numbers 2 and several other prime numbers as angles.  I wrote about them here https://blog.centroid.eu/c?article=1471335755 . My question is has anyone found these before?  What are they called? 2003:D2:570D:ED00:155B:5A07:2CE3:37AE (talk) 04:48, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: For an angle, being an integer or being a prime number depends on the choice of an angle unit. If you consider angles in degree, this amounts to decompose 178 into a sum of two primes. This is a special case of Goldbach's conjecture. As these few triangles have no other remarkable property, I doubt that they have ever got a specific name. D.Lazard (talk) 08:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  All prime angled triangles / what are they called? 

message: There is an additional type of triangle that should be dealt-with in this article: the often-used meta-term: 'needle triangle'.
 
Here is the link to an article ('Spherical Parameterization and Remeshing') on the web that uses the term:
 
https://hhoppe.com/sphereparam.pdf Kontribuanto (talk) 21:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This article defines the term without using it (the word "needle" appears only two times in the article, in the same paragraph). I have encounered another definition, as a triangle with a very small angle. These definitions are not equivalent although one implies the other in the case of plane triangles. For mentioning the term in the article, we need sources that provide an evidence that there is a commonly accepted definition. D.Lazard (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing subtopic: needle triangle
Talk:Science journalist

message: Shouldn't this properly be called science journalist? :-)
:And shouldn't it be merged with :Category:Science writers? Peak Freak 11:16, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two quick comments:
*David Bradley is a disambig page which doesn't even include the science reporter.  Someone more familiar than I with the blog should decide whether he is sufficiently notable for a wikibio and if so write it or if not delete the link.
*William Broad is one of the most active science reporters for the NYT and has written several books; isn't he notatable?
HTH ---CH 02:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:Soviet collectivism

message: Maybe it's just me, but a reference to the Borg of Star Trek on a page about Soviet Collectivism just makes me gnash my teeth. orthogonal 18:57, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, I (obviously) did not write it; I am merely one of two people seeking to restore it after it was deleted by vandal HectorRodriguez.  Second of all, it is not a rant and should not be characterized as such.  If you feel the facts are off or its description of the failures of the system are inaccurate, you should fix them rather than simply nix this description, especially since you seem to be saying you know the subject.  I for now am also going to AssumeGoodFaith that you're not telling me I'm ranting and rambling.  (As a side note, there's far worse crap than this on Wikipedia.) -- VV 05:25, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: First of all, this is a collaborative project, so your last declaration is out of line.  Two people favor the restoration, two its deletion.  That's why we're discussing it.  Anyway, the life cycle of Wikipedia article is very often starting with poorly written and poorly organized beginnings, which are then fleshed out and improved by others.  Your policy seems to be to delete or undo anything that's not perfect, which does not work well.  You seem too concerned with what others will think of the project if they stumble upon an intermediate stage, but there's plenty of other bad articles out there, and we have a long way to go before this will be all high-quality work (possibly never).  Maybe it will encourage others to get involved?  -- VV 20:48, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Günter Wand

message: The link at the bottom for his website is now defunct.--72.94.172.49 (talk) 07:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: website

message: The box does not cite Wand as having occupied a formal position either at the Gürzenich or Cologne Radio Symphony. Is that right?
Also the sentence "In 1974, he left Cologne to conduct the WDR" looks weird to me since the WDR (West German Radio) is based in Cologne. S.Camus 08:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Positions