lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hal Porter

message: I am just wondering if anyone knows of any corroborative evidence for the allegations of paedophilia raised by Mary Lord? I should say that, by this, I don't merely mean other sources which reference the Mary Lord allegations. Research17 (talk) 01:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot locate any corroborative evidence of the Lord allegations. Given that Wikipedia is based upon fact rather than allegations, I thought it prudent to remove the allegations from the article. Now, I am aware that Porter may well have been a paedophile, although the problem is that this was never tested in court, and indeed the man is now not able to defend himself. If Porter were still alive, the allegations would be probably defamatory, notwithstanding the purported long-standing friendship between Lord and Porter. What I've done is to simply make reference to the controversial 1993 biography. It should not be too difficult for any reader to work out what made the bio controversial. Let me know if you don't think this is reasonable. Research17 (talk) 21:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corroborative evidence for paedophilia allegation
Talk:Drop tower

message: Giant drop needs to link to the Giant Drop rides, not to Dreamworld (fixed).  There are drop towers named Giant Drop in the US too, and others of the same design with different names.
There are many other drop tower rides that aren't listed, like Superman at Six Flags Over Texas (similar to Cedar Points but taller and with only 3 towers), and the gyro drops at Kings Island  (Drop Zone) and Six Flags Over Georgia (Acrophobia).   I dont quite understand where to put them on wiki or all the models, and don't know where they're all located (at which parks), or I would.
AtmosFear is Europe's tallest drop tower, source: http://www.liseberg.com/en/home/Amusement-Park/Rides--Attractions/AtmosFear/ ~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.230.88.164 (talk) 22:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There has recently been a fatal accident in Brazil involving a drop tower called "La Tour Eiffel" at the theme park Hopi Hari in the city of Vinhedo. A 14-year-old girl died after falling from the tower as it descended. I think it would probably be relevant to add this information to the article. Here are some references in Portuguese:      . Faciam (talk) 00:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Accident in Brazil
Talk:Didsbury Park

message: Why do we need a seperate article on a single park? Is it notable for any reason? Even if it is, why can the information not be included in the Didsbury article? J Milburn 18:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There we go, not notable, should be deleted. Wikipedia has a policy that every article should be on a notable subject, as explained here, to prevent people writing about any old thing. Why should this one park have a whole article about it? There is no way there should be an article on my garden, the play-park down the road from me, the river in my back field, my back field, my street... I could go on. Of course, there is room for an article on my village, and all relevent information about the non-notable items within the village can be included there. J Milburn 19:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this article needed?
Talk:William C. Sullivan

message: While King did have extramarital affairs, he was not abusive nor did he beat women. Ralph David Abernathy states in his book that King was "always gracious and courteous to women."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.49.158 (talk) 01:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. I was shocked to read this prejudicial language in a Wikipedia article. I revised the language to read "affairs" -- and even this requires a citation if anyone expects it to stand.--BenJonson (talk) 21:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martin Luther King 

message: Nor is, by extension of that, anything written by Roger Stone and Mike Colapietro.89.146.144.50 (talk) 17:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book on an "LBJ killed JFK" conspiracy theory is not a reliable source 

message: There's nothing on here about Sullivan's role in using FBI collected info to Blackmail people after becoming a rogue agent ... as in his role in Watergate... 2001:8003:6A23:2C00:2513:DF7A:FE4E:B5E8 (talk) 01:33, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sullivan's role in using FBI collected info to Blackmail people 

message: There is a big gap in time between most of the 1940s, all of the 1950s, and most of the 1960s:  readers, please feel free to add! - Aboudaqn (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Cold War time gap

message: the following (unsourced) sentence without date is in the lemma: 
:Eventually, King's behavior led J. Edgar Hoover to publicly call King a "notorious liar." 
Did King's behavior lead J. Edgar Hoover ? No.  
No one will ever know why Hoover said that in public (REM: citation needed). 
Without source and date, this sentence is an infamy 
(King was murdered on 4. April 1968 and there is heaps of Secondary source). 
I make it a hidden text. Search'n'write (talk) 13:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sullivan called King a "notorious liar."
Talk:Viejo smoking

message: In this page there is a mistake between "Viejo smoking", a 1930's short film and "Así es el tango", a 1937's film. You can see Así es el tango and es:Viejo smoking (película) or http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0021521/ and http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0191794/.
Sorry I don't know enough English for correct it by myself.--Héctor Guido Calvo (talk) 19:09, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake
Talk:Bemisia tabaci

message: The cited reference in the article is a scientific database which releases the infromation for use by others, but the wording of the releae is unclear.
The article in question is copied from here.  And teh conditions of use for the database is given here.  But the phrase and the right to ensure that the original integrity of their contribution to the Commons is preserved might seem to indicate that we are not freely able to alter the text. -- Whpq 18:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: The Lifecycle section has a large quote from McAuslane, but what article? If, as it seems to be, the article used is her UF/IFAS Featured Creatures publication (see External links), than that publication is about the silverleaf whitefly, not the sweetpotato whitefly. While these species are very, very similar in their lifecycle and description, the quote needs to be referenced to ensure it is providing the correct information. Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lifecycle section
Talk:D. Worth Clark

message: Regarding the move of this page, D. Worth Clark (62%) and Worth Clark (38%) are the only iterations of Clark's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com. Star Garnet (talk) 05:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Audio over Ethernet

message: "Over Ethernet" implies that the audio application sits on top of Ethernet's layer 2. "Layer 1 Audio over Ethernet" is more likely "Audio over Cat 5". "Audio over IP" is just that, no matter what media TCP/IP sits on top of. Since the text also lacks substantial references I'm going to weed this out unless there are any objections. -- Zac67 (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what you mean by "weed this out" but I don't see a problem here. Layer 1 protocols use the Ethernet physical layer. Layer 2 protocols use the Ethernet MAC layer. Both are audio over Ethernet. Layer 3 protocols are generally IP and there is a prominent link to Audio over IP in that section. Some audio over IP implementations assume IP over Ethernet so it is reasonable to include some discussion here. ~KvnG 20:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  There isn't anything Ethernet on a simple Cat 5 cable. To call it "Ethernet" it would need to use at least the same layer 1 encoding and packet structure, ie. being propagated through Ethernet repeaters/hubs. Running a digital signal of some kind over a TP cable can't reasonably be called Ethernet. -- Zac67 (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: All the systems listed in Audio_over_Ethernet#Layer_1_protocols use an Ethernet PHY so they use Ethernet electrical and byte encoding but not necessarily Ethernet packet structure. ~KvnG 15:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for checking this out. Apparently, I was a bit jumping to conclusions a bit too quickly – however, at least RockNet doesn't seem to use Ethernet, just Cat5 cabling. I'll check them out and move those to §Similar concepts. -- Zac67 (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Layer?
Talk:Mr. Dibbs

message: This link for the album Outer Perimeter leads to something completely unrelated. I'd fix it but my wiki-fu is weak. On a related note I'm also unhappy at the lack of wikification of that album and Presage. 206.174.33.78 (talk) 08:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: holla, i wrote the article and didn't notice that the link pointed elsewhere. i don't know a lot about Presage and "Outer Perimeter" meself, but we could easily work on this pair of articles if you want? tomasz. 10:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work on the article! I don't really know much about the album other than the artists (Dose One, Jel, and Dibbs), and that it's one of the best albums I own. I could also go off on the themes in it, but it'd all be original research. 206.174.33.78 (talk) 19:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work with group [[Presage]] 
Talk:United States Senate Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, Local Food Systems, and Food Safety and Security

message: This hopefully will explain all of the recent moves and redirects I did with this page. The bulk of these moves were to reflect the new subcommittee's title in the 110th Congress from the Subcommittee on Marketing, Inspection, and Product Promotion. I was confused by the format of the Seante Agriculture committee website and thought the word "jurisdiciton was included in the committee's name. This led to some erroneous moves on my part, which original broke the history of the original article. The subcommittee title also uses "&" on the official website, but that doesn't appear to conform with the other committee articles, which prefer to spell out "and." I moved the article to this current page to both eliminate the use of ampersands and to restore the article history.
Since this article really only is linked by a handful of other committee articles, I didn't feel that moving the article was all that problematic, as long as I tried to fix it to where the article title is as accurate as possible. I think I have accomplished that. I have also tried to fix double redirects for the article.
Hopefully this worked and isn't too confusing for everyone. I've only been editing for a few months and still have a few hiccups when I move articles, and with the Democratic changes in Congress it appears quite a few subcommittees are getting new names. I'm getting better and will try to be more aware of my moves in the future.Dcmacnut 19:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moves and Redirects
Talk:Tijuana Makes Me Happy

message: This article seems to have been written by the film's director, yet it is notable for having won an award at Sundance.  How can we make it more neutral XinJeisan 19:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:East Hants Penguins

message: The logo on the article has the same image as that of the Cleveland Monsters.  I guess the team used it for a while, but it's not current.  Their website now shows an image of a penguin (an emperor penguin, I think!).  It would be an improvement to the article to get this updated.  Regards, PKT(alk) 13:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo update needed
Talk:Twelve Oaks Mall

message: I'll try to take some exterior shots this weekend. Interior may be difficult, because Taubman has historically prohibited photography inside the mall. Kevin 17:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I wondered if anyone knew the names of the old bar near the movie theaters and the pizza place? Also the pet store that was originally there near Sears? 2600:1007:B03B:4E03:781B:14B5:A5EE:8D0B (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of past buissinesses
Talk:Bob Roseveare

message: Repton is in Derbyshire (not Devon). DFH 19:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repton 

message: While the article is tagged as an orphan a number of people listed on the page of People Associated wiyth Bletchley Park will have only 2-3 likns (to the main BP page and to their section! Hugo999 00:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan?
Talk:Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM lens

message: What's the point of using a Canon template for Sigma lenses that are available for various lens mounts?--Sitacuisses 19:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: The section labeled Controversy is dreadful and almost certainly original research. If the various claims can't be substantiated I propose deletion. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 01:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This is completely original research, and is not NPOV. While I have read such claim on various online chat forum's. I have read few comments from reliable, significant source. I do think that some of the statements are true. This lens does have soft corners, but this information must be from a good source. When I created the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 article, I included a Advantages & Problems section. I made sure to keep it a NPOV section. I believe this is important. The goal of the wikian is to not praise or bash what is being discussed, but to give the reader as much information that is relevant to the subject. Whether its good or bad. . . I'm going to try and find some reliable sources, do some heavy deletion of non NPOV text, and try to keep things balanced. Nebrot (talk) 09:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 

message: The controversy section has apparently been edited and renamed into Optical properties. IMO, the claims are still controversial and poorly referenced. A discussion board is not a reliable source. Personally I disagree with some of the statements made, but neither my nor any others personal opinions/subjective experiences should appear in a Wiki article. Also, I agree with users 83.104.249.240 and Nebrot, that this looks like original research. I propose deletion of the entire section, since little has been done to remedy it for well over a year now. Charlie (talk) 09:36, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optical properties section
Talk:Betula nigra

message: Height vs. girth in discussing tree size:  When we refer to a tree's size (such as "a small tree") does size always refer to height?   I have an old river birch in my back yard that is around 25M tall, but it's still a giant tree, with the base of the trunk at around 8 ft. in diameter, and with each of the five individual trunk shoots at around 2-3 ft in diameter.  I'm not sure that a 25M tree is necessarily small, maybe we should specify short, vs stout, etc.   Reklawpj 20:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to Birch, B. nigra is River Birch or Black Birch (both shared with Betula lenta), whereas Water Birch/Red Birch is Betula occidentalis (=? Betula fontinalis). Dysmorodrepanis 21:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; the above names also concur with USDA use (which is why they were so entered at Birch in the first place). I've sorted the mess out. - MPF 15:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy/name problem

message: Planning on adding some additional information to the article. I've compiled three sources so far:
-Wojtech, Michael. Bark: A Field Guide to Trees of the Northeast. University Press of New England, 2011. (110-111).
-Murrell, Zack E. Vascular Plant Taxonomy. 6th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, 2010.
-Flora of North America. Vol. 3. River Birch.
--Katieeliz04 (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: New Additions/Sources
Talk:Briarwood Mall

message: Let's have some photos Thomas Paine1776 19:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done --Traveler100 (talk) 11:45, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:El Manatí

message: As with the La Venta article - 
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&t=h&ie=UTF8&ll=17.622427,-94.641552&spn=0.071823,0.11673&z=13&om=1
Mhrobb 15:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks again, Mhrobb; I've added the coords to the article. Cheers, --cjllw ʘ TALK 03:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Delta cell

message: The image is fantastic; however, I believe that the muscarinic receptor on the ECL cell is M1, not M3.  Also, there is a discrepancy as to whether the cholinergic innervation of the D cell causes stimulation or inhibition (the one at the top implies stimulation, the one at the bottom implies inhibition).
ThanksWikimeducation 19:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual error
Talk:Stromal cell-derived factor 1

message: Is there a Bot which can change all the redirects from this disambiguous name SDF-1 (biology) to this new place? It seems like a hard work changing all those links to this page manually. Yet, I think the factor is better with this new, original, name. Mikael Häggström 07:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need a Bot 

message: Hi, i've just added a bit of extra information about CXCL12's role in cancer based on a new paper that came out this week. KatArney (talk) 12:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Added a bit more info
Talk:Joe Edwards (comics)

message: I changed the date of death due to an AP obituary which had 1 February 2007 as the date of death. Capitalistroadster 19:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: That's what, 45 yers ago? Silly, fannish phrase. 2A02:AA1:1017:245B:5DBB:879F:36C2:A666 (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "as recently as the 1980s"
Talk:Regulon

message: from Clq05: "and what's the major differences between the regulon and operon in structure?"  (moved from article to talk page). Alfalfahotshots (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See MeSH term: Interacting DNA-encoded regulatory subsystems in the GENOME that coordinate input from activator and repressor TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS during development, cell differentiation, or in response to environmental cues. The networks function to ultimately specify expression of particular sets of GENES for specific conditions, times, or locations. 
Wwwwwwwd (talk) 21:49, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Does a regulon count as a subset of [[gene regulatory network]] (GRN)?
Talk:Product (biology)

message: This article is too short
this is a good thing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.237.198 (talk) 23:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 

message: This has been merged into product (chemistry) and expanded. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 10:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:CapZ

message: Hello, I'm editing this article for my Cellular Biology class.  I plan on adding sections about CapZ's role in cell movement and autophagosomal membrane scaffolding, as well as expanding on functions.  If you have any papers or journals that could help me with this it would be greatly appreciated! Rever004 (talk) 19:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Editor
Talk:Nazko Cone

message: Lots more needed for this article. I found quite a bit of information about Nazko's eruptive and mining history in a few papers, as well as data on former environments in the Nazko area extending back to when Nazko Cone had its first eruption 350,000 years ago. More information about Nazko's volcanic hazards has been published after the 2007–2008 Nazko earthquakes began. There is quite a bit of information for such a small volcano..... BT (talk) 06:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition 
Talk:RNA-binding protein

message: Lacarubb (talk) 10:25, 28 February 2013
Haned6011 (talk) 16:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Educational assignment

message: Overall, you guys did a really great job at updating this article!  The information presented is extensive and gives wide coverage of the topic.  I went through and made a bunch of corrections with regards to punctuation, spelling, and grammar.  I also have some corrections/suggestions.  Here are the more general ones first:
*Italicize scientific names of organisms (Xenopus, C. elegans, C. albicans, etc.)
*Remove "Examples" section - I do not think it is necessary since you provide numerous examples throughout the article
*Place "RNA-binding activity and recognition of the RNA sequence" section right after structure section since it discusses info that more closely goes with structure - I think this would help the article flow a little better
*Fairly good amount of wikilinks – go through once more and see if you can add any more
*Cite references more – not just at the end of a paragraph
*Maybe add a few more pictures if possible
*Cool video of C. elegans
Here are some more specific corrections/suggestions:
*Make intro flow more smoothly – maybe add some more transition words
*Remove the last two sentences of "Structure" section – I do not think they relate to structure
*"Diversity" section – change the words "emerges" and "naked" to other words that are more fitting and appropriate, remove the last sentence
*"Alternative splicing" section – remove the word "our", clarify what hnRNA and snRNP stand for
*"Polyadenylation" section – fix the wikilink to 3'UTR so it actually links to that page, clarify what CPSF stands for
*"dsRBM" section – remove "firstly," "secondly"
*"RRM" section –discuss this first since it is the most common one
*"Zinc finger" section – remove sentence beginning with “similar to…”, remove “that are mentioned above,” last sentence doesn’t make sense
*"Germline" section – is (4) supposed to be a reference citation? 
*"Current research" section – remove “this section will briefly…”, where is UUGUUGUGUUGU sequence found?, clarify the beginning of the sentence starting with "serine-arginine..."
Prewmi (talk) 23:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Review from prewmi
Talk:Sung Kang

message: It is never stated that he is of Korean descent, never mind NORTH Korean descent in Tokyo Drift. He is presented as either an Asian-American or Japanese-American.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.103.178.236 (talk) 06:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokyo Drift 

message: SUNG KANG A JOUé LE RÖLE DE LONG WAI ET DE XIAN SUR LA SERIE LE FLIC DE SCHANGHAI IL ETAIT LE FILS DE SAMMO LAW DE L'ACTEUR SAMMO HUNG RAJOUTER DANS SA FILMOGRAPHIE
      SIMON RUMIZ
      VOICI MA MESSAGERIE
        SIMONRUMIZ@WANADOO.FR  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.9.190.90 (talk) 07:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUNG KANG 

message: Added Korean name to Infobox (강성호) plus both romanizations Rickinasia (talk) 13:33, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangul 한굴