lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:St John's Wood tube station

message: I would dispute any attempt to remove the material in the 'Trivia' section relating to Mackerel from this article as to do so would be depriving the audience of the predominant reason for St. John's Wood Tube Station's notoriety in British culture. At least preserve the mackerel related information under a different heading - the latter part of that section is less relevant. Royshearer (talk) 23:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Trivia' section 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ugee123 (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research, Writing, and the Production of Knowledge
Talk:Milorg

message: Removed the following - it is incorrect, and mixes Milorg with the Norwegian resistance movement as a whole. Some of it can be useful, though:
:They existed from 1940 to 1945. Famous parts and individuals of their company was the "Oslo gang", "Linge Company" and "nr. 24" - Gunnar Sønsteby or Kjakan. They were also famous for sabotaging submarines, government buildings or the  Heavywater factory used to produce the special water that was used in preparing nuclear materials.  They usually hid in cottages in more rural areas before going near any "civilized" areas to do  resistance work against the Nazi occupation.
The following link is a good source for the history of Milorg (in Norwegian): 
* http://dokkeveien.uib.no/digitalskolen/motstand/milorg.htm
-- Egil 07:18, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier discussions
Talk:Subjective idealism

message: I'm pretty sure the proper term for Berkeley's philosophy is "classic idealism," not "subjective idealism." Berkeley would object to his philosophy being termed "subjective," as he holds strongly to a belief that the physical world does have an objective existence, he just claims that that existence is dependent on God. --kpearce 07:45, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Classic Idealism

message: In the objective idealism article talk page I mention how that article and this one do not clearly show the difference between those two kinds of idealism, and do nothing to distinguish the two as being in any way different except by claiming so. What is the difference? Does the ideal world posit itself to the subject in subjective idealism & the subject project the ideal world from themselves in objective idealism? That is all that could be gleamed from how they are now written: The terminology sounds reversed if that were the case but it may have nothing to do with such a difference taken to be.
It would seem to me from the nature of the persons associated with said respective philosophies that subjective idealism denied a material existence & objective idealism accepted it though made it unaccountable; however the writing on the objective idealism page immediately seems to posit that its world is purely ideally created also. Nagelfar 21:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objective & subjective. 

message: # Applied solipsism
Currently this link is blocked by the government of US.
http://www.oocities.com/CapitolHill/8171/solipsism.htm
Looks suspicious, because of the resemblance to now defunct geocities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.14.254.26 (talk) 11:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange external links 

message: Greetings! The See also section just recently doubled, expanding from 8 links to 16 links. Most of these links, although being related to philosophy in the broadest sense, don't seem to be related to "subjective idealism" in specific. There was no Edit Summary provided, so I was hoping if the very editor could explain these additions. Thanks. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 16:07, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: According to WP:LINKFARM: "Wikipedia articles are not merely collections of: [...] Internal links, except for disambiguation pages when an article title is ambiguous, and for lists for browsing or to assist with article organization and navigation; for these, please follow the guidelines outlined at Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Lead and selection criteria." Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section doubled 

message: Pantheism does not "appeal" to anything. Pantheism does not "appeal to a world-spirit".
All pantheism says, is All is god. That's it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.205.45.193 (talk) 13:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pantheism
Category talk:English composers

message: I was just wondering whether anyone thinks its time the British (or perhaps you'd rather say English, since he's from Yorkshire) theatre composer (well composer/lyricist - he does both) Jason Carr should be considered for inclusion? I think he is mentioned in a few places in Wikipedia, such as 
: The Chichester Festival Theatre- because he has written three musicals that have played there. (well if he isn't mentioned on that page his musicals and various plays he wrote incidental music for are)
:Lee Miller - because he wrote a musical about her
:Sunday in the Park with George - because he worked on the recent revival as an orchestrator.
: The Guildhall School of Music and Drama - because that's where he trained.
What does anyone else think? Skekayuk 21:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jason Carr?

message: Hm. There's a Category:British composers, too, as I just noticed -- should these be merged? Which should be kept? Mindspillage | spill your mind? 08:22, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I acted on this; see Category talk:British composers. David Brooks 00:06, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cataory?

message: If Handel finds a place here, should not Clementi? Though he was born in Rome (of Swiss parents) he was a naturalised Englishman, and spent his entre life in England (save for continental tours) from the age of seven. He was even an Anglican!
Fiddleback 23:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clementi? 

message: A Wikipedia search for Edward Purcell, son of the more famous Henry Purcell quickly takes the searcher direct to Edward Mills Purcell, a US scientist. There is a page called Edward Purcell, but it is just an automated redirect page to Edward Mills Purcell. 
Is there any way to offer the searcher using the Wikipedia search engine, the means to be alerted to the existence of the page for Edward Purcell (musician)?
Ucypanp (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edward Purcell
Category talk:British composers

message: Hm. There's a Category:British composers, too, as I just noticed -- should these be merged? Which should be kept? Mindspillage | spill your mind? 08:22, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... good question.  I think so, but I'd like someone from the UK to weigh in on this, since I'm a little confused by the exact meaning of these terms.  Is a Welsh composer also a British composer?  Is an English composer also a British composer, but only after 1800?  (For another wormcan of confusion, is a United States composer a subset of American composers?)  Antandrus 19:07, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My personal thought is that Scottish/Welsh/etc. composers should be listed as such (since that's how they're usually identified), rather than "British", and this cat done away with. (I put someone here earlier, but only because I didn't notice there was a cat for "English".) But I don't know how sticky an issue it is with UK-dwellers, myself. As for "American"... I suppose we'll let sleeping cats lie, or something... Mindspillage | spill your mind? 19:30, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and emptied the cat, making them English instead of British (there were only four, and Guy d'Hardelot was French--according to the Grove--at any rate she was born in Boulogne and schooled in France).  If anyone objects let us know!  Antandrus 20:12, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's filling up again: Holborne, Bache, Elgar, German, Ouseley as of today. I'm making Elgar English because I happen to have the page open. Does anyone object to emptying it again and deleting the category? I don't think all of the regular contributors to British musical topics have appeared in this discussion. David Brooks 00:21, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Great Britain" properly refers to the island comprising England, Scotland and Wales; the term "British" can be used (e.g. on passports) as a shorthand form for "of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".  So Scottish/Welsh/English composers are all subcategories of British composers.  Most Scottish and Welsh people prefer to be referred to as Scottish and Welsh; most English people aren't that bothered either way but it would be more precise and consistent to list them here under English. In that case the British category isn't likely to be much used if at all and is probably best deleted if it's going to cause confusion. Wilus 11:28, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: Did it. I also redirected Scots to Scottish (I think the latter is correct in this context). I was then chagrined to find so few Scots or Welsh composers available to populate these categories. Someone should write about Hamish MacCunn and Grace Williams. David Brooks 01:01, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm. Not sure what the Irish will think about being corralled with the Brits but I'll leave it to them to object. Looks good otherwise. Wilus 10:36, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Scream If You Wanna Go Faster

message: I believe the title is 'Scream If You Wanna Go Faster", not 'if'...Please redirect - not sure how to do it for this. Zigzig20s 19:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  capital letter 

message: Surely by now long term sales are enough for the album to be more than gold  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.109.157.165 (talk) 00:40, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales
Talk:Samy Vellu

message: "This infurates Abdullah Badawi so badly that many a times that he wanted to expel him as the works minister. Vellu, on the other hand, was not an easy person to be shaken off, as he has a lot of Indian and Chinese supporters and by expelling him off by force, the Malaysian government will have to be prepared to take a heavy toll." 
----
I dont see the justification of mentioning this (even if it is true, which it is not) in Samy Vellu's bio Menj 09:26, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue 

message: I found some vandalism happening on this page. People are uttering bad words and phrases. I have removed some of them. Hopefully this wiki page can be kept clean, else will be deleted out. --killerserv 07:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Vandalism

message: Is it true that he has a mistress? Unless that can be proven by some reliable source, I don't think that piece of info should be in Wikipedia.Wai Hong (talk) 10:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistress

message: Jallikattu 42.104.192.22 (talk) 18:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sir I want jallikattu tecket in India theni dt ayyampatti can you give 1ticket sir please what about your power,in India, but I know your power in malaysia,urgent
Talk:Battle Meditation

message: Palpatine's Battle Meditation ability is mentioned in one of the Expanded Universe novels.  I'm thinking it was The Truce at Bakura, but I'm not sure (it's been a while since I read that).  Can anyone say authoritatively which book it is in?
:I don't know about The Truce at Bakura, but Battle Meditation is also mentioned (albeit not by that name) in the Thrawn trilogy by Timothy Zahn. Grand Admiral Thrawn explains to someone why the Battle of Endor was lost after the destruction of the Death Star, even though there were enough Star Destroyers left to wipe out the rebel fleet. He concludes that the Emperor must have used what is called Battle Meditation in KotOR, and that the troops were demoralized and confused after it was interrupted. --Drangon
::I don't remember battle meditation being mentioned in Truce at Bakura, but it has been a while for me as well. --Aidje 21:36, 2005 Mar 29 (UTC)
:::There was a battle computer in The Truce at Bakura, which aspired to do much the same thing, but tactically.  And btw, there is no actual evidence that either the Emperor or Darth Vader had any skills in Battle Meditation- the Death Star mk II's guarding fleet was empowered by Grand Admiral Nial Declann.  --Maru  (talk) Contribs 23:26, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  EU mentions 

message: Does this power really deserve its own page?  We already have a page dedicated to Force Powers.  What reason to have this page?  It's not a particularly common ability like Telepathy, it does not appear in the movies, and within the games, books, and comics it does not appear frequently at all.  -- Solberg 06:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra page
Talk:VERITAS Software

message: The name "VERITAS" is always capitalized. The company does not have a trademark on the name "Veritas". See the trademark usage page for more info. -- Scott  10:19, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
The encyclopedia is not a promotional device for companies.  The practice of rendering a company’s name in all caps is promoted by the companies themselves, to make their brand names scream off the page.  That is not our job.  They can do it themselves, if they like, but we are not obligated to follow.  Veritas may always render its name in all caps, but an examination of the encyclopedia shows that the majority of pages already used lowercase, including this article itself, except for the title line.  Neutral point of view demands that we follow standard practice for the encyclopedia, not company-dictated brand enhancement.  <BR>— Ford 11:20, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)
:I'm moving it back again. According to any of the company's various SEC filings, the legal name is "VERITAS Software Corporation". Brand enhancement or no, it is the name of the company. -- Scott eiπ 09:50, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
Have reinstated a link to , previously removed by another editor, believing it to be spam.  I don't regard it as spam, as contains a profile of VERITAS.  --Sgkay 07:27, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The use of all-caps is specifically addressed in the Manual of Style at MOS:TM. We don't do it. I'm moving the article back. GlassFET 20:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It was suggested that Veritas Storage Foundation be merged into this article.  It should remain seperate, as it is a product, and not the sole product of Veritas Software.  Note that Symantec continues to sell Veritas Storage Foundation, so it is no longer tied exclusively to this article.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 18:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - should remain definitely remain seperate.  As should Veritas Cluster Server, Veritas NetBackup, Veritas Volume Manager and VERITAS File System. --Oscarthecat 19:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of [[Veritas Storage Foundation]] into this article? 

message: I suggest merging Tolerant into this article.  Nobody else links to Tolerant and AFAIK it serves as the logical predecessor only to VERITAS. -- Austin Murphy 19:44, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: tentatively approve after it is merged, it will probably have to be rewritten and branched out to a History of Veritas Software article almost immediately. Aliasd 03:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Due to the Symantec merger, VERITAS is already historical. -- Austin Murphy 17:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of [[Tolerant Systems]]
Talk:Green Anarchist

message: Copied this over from Steve Booth talk page in case anybody wants to integrate it into the article somehow (it's a shame the original poster didn't do so themselves as they seem to have plenty to say as to what 'should' be in the article) quercus robur 10:57, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: note from John Connor
Template talk:Other places

message: This template was listed for deletion on Templates for Deletion.  The decision was to keep  this template.  Please see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/Not deleted for more information.  If you are viewing this after April, you may have to use the archive.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frazzydee (talk • contribs) 22:36, 20 April 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The appropriate archive is Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/Not deleted/April 2005#Template:Otherplaces. Hairy Dude 22:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TfD'd
Talk:Circumcision and law

message: Looking through this article, almost no sections starts by saying what the law is. Instead, they states what the opinion of some professional doctors association think of circumcision. While this is relevant to include, it should not be the first this to say. We should always start by saying what the law is.  ― Hebsen (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is about the law, not opinions 

message: I propose merging this article into circumcision, history of circumcision, and views on circumcision per WP:REDUNDANTFORK. 
The present article simply repeats (often verbatim) material on related articles or goes into WP: Trivia cases that didn't amount to any substantive change in law. KlayCax (talk) 19:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at the history of the merge attempt on this article too and though you claimed you were merging, you merely deleted this article outright. None of the material was transferred to the circumcision or history of circumcision or views on circumcision article by you. This is the wrong way to approach merging requests.
Plus this article was here since 2002 and the views on circumcision was barely created by you last year. You cannot call this a redundant article since this one was an original article here. If anything the article you made last year article is the one that is actually redundant. 
I think that this article has a different scope than the articles you mentioned above. In fact this article focuses on legal matters than just moral or religious or cultural matters. Should be kept separate. Otherwise you will get even bigger circumcision articles.47.179.9.162 (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

text: I fully concur with IP. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Article should be merged per WP: REDUNDANTFORK
Talk:Kataklysm

message: In the infobox, it says they were formed in 1991, but in the Biography, it says they were formed in 1992.--§ Eloc § 23:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox vs Biography 

message: I don't know about you guys but I think Kataklysm has some Melodic Death Metal in them. Their songs have melodeath-sounding chords and are kind of "uplifting" like Melodic Death Metal. Feel free to get rid of it if you want but I still think they have some Melodeath in them.--Snook666 (talk) 22:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melodic Death Metal 

message: Question: Why does the link next to the genre ("Death Metal (See Below)") link to a section that has nothing at all to do with their genre or the reasoning for it? I'll go ahead and remove it, and someone else can reinstate it if it becomes useful. 99.25.89.2 (talk) 08:20, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox.. 

message: kataklysm est un groupe vrm sa coche. yo dude sont tlm fort qui pourrai avoir juste eux sa terre pis le monde serai toute content. men tu comprend pas sont tlm les best que meme toute soul mort y donne un meilleur show que n'importe qui. c que jesus... c le meilleur !!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.162.143.250 (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  the influence of kataklysm 

message: How is the drum pattern used in the soundclip on this page different from that of a normal blast beat pattern?  It doesn't seem worth devoting page space to. 209.250.204.133 (talk) 18:13, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Hyperblast? 

message: Support split - Discography section is becoming long and should be split to a new article entitled "Kataklysm discography".  Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kataklysm discography
Talk:Klaatu barata niktu

message: Why have you redirected Klaatu barada nikto to Klaatu barata niktu?  The correct spelling is Klaatu barada nikto (26,500 google hits), not Klaatu barata niktu (436 google hits).  Also see ,  --Viriditas  | Talk 12:42, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Klaatu barada nikto
Talk:Timor Sea

message: Changed "Timor Leste" to "East Timor."  I realize the country calls itself Timor Leste, but this is the English wikipedia and we should use English names.  We don't refer to France as the Republique Francais.  Also, the map plainly says "East Timor," and it's confusing if the article uses a different name. Bizud 12:50, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Japan Academy Film Prize

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
# Support as nominator. Doctor Sunshine talk 01:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support as nominator. Doctor Sunshine talk 01:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: #Oppose as the official title according to the official site is Japan Academy Prize. I'm fine with Japan Academy Award being a redirect. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 16:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in opposition to the move

message: From what I understand, godzilla was nominated for Best Picture in 1954 but lost to Seven Samurai? Atleast according to IMDB.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.25.18.155 (talk) 08:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Godzilla nominated for Best Picture 

message: Eiga.com says (according to my machine translation, if I'm reading it right; I don't read Japanese) that at the 43 awards in 2020, ATasuku Emoto won Best Supporting Actor category (and Masaki Suda was nominated in the Best Actor category).  
 
But for one thing the 43rd awards were in 2019, 2020 was the 44th awards (according to this article). So maybe that source is sloppy and useless? But this article, for some reason, doesn't say who won the 2020 Best Supporting Actor category. The rows don't line up for 2020, and it looks like Midnight Swan won for Best Animated Work, but that film is not animated, so it's hard to tell what's going on. Is there a better source for this info? Herostratus (talk) 17:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  So who won the 2020 best supporting actor awards?
Category talk:Diseases and disorders

message: This is the overarching category for all disease entities. An entry can be in one or more of its subcategories, or directly under this category. However, please avoid placement in both a subcategory and this top-level category.
: The above was added by a user called "Lexor"
::What does he/she mean by his/her use of the english word 'disease'
::Alec - U.K. 16:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alec stop querying definition of disease as you have on multiple pages, e.g. Asthma and Diabetes (see Talk:Non-communicable disease). Suggest read Disease and accept it is what is internationally defined by World Health Organization's ICD10 list. David Ruben  Talk  21:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a connection somewhere between:
:::Category:Diseases and disorders
and 
:::Category:Animal diseases?  XOttawahitech (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Currantly :Category:Animal diseases is a subcategoy of :Category:Diseases and disorders which has the unfortunate side effect of including animal diseases as a subcategory of :Category:medicine. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Animal diseases]]