Talk:Microsoft Academic Search

message: I'll try to organize some materials and revise this articale recently.Luogang.china 12:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sounds overly promotional; reads too much like a how-to; apparently mostly written by Microsoft as indicated by the reference to "our editors". Nurg (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleanup 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cnblogs.com/takeitandgo/archive/2011/03/12/1981978.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  RockMagnetist (talk) 03:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The URL on my computer is http://academic.research.microsoft.com, not "search." Kdammers (talk) 05:46, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: There was a logo for the (now defunct) Microsoft Academic Search that I uploaded per the guideline on logos, which allows low-quality images of logos for identification.  It has been replaced by an image that is described as "own work", and as far as I can tell, is not anyone's logo. To me, that seems pointless, so I am reverting the changes.  if you have a good reason for making this change, can you please explain it below? RockMagnetist(talk) 02:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Do we really need separate wikipedia pages for Microsoft Academic and Microsoft Academic Search? Can we just move the Microsoft Academic Search content to a History section of Microsoft Academic? I'm pasting this same text on the Talk page for Microsoft Academic too.Sharp-shinned.hawk (talk) 18:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Pages for essentially the same tool 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Microsoft Academic Search. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140225095910/http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/academic/ to http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/academic/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140213082154/http://academic.research.microsoft.com/About/Help.htm to http://academic.research.microsoft.com/About/Help.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140225095910/http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/academic/ to http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/academic/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)