Talk:35-hour workweek

message: New York City civil servants also have a 35 hour workweek and it was established before 2000. Maybe there other municipalities around the world that might have established something similar, but regardless France is not the only place.
Coming soon: Much of this material, I've realized, doesn't have anything to do with the 35-hour workweek (French or otherwise) per se, so much as the workweek in general. I'll move it to workweek, where it will be more appropriate, some time today. Mike Church 11:15, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The City of New York 

message: I changed "left-wing" and "right-wing" in the criticism section to "liberal" and "conservative" to depict the parties with accurate verbiage rather than use inflamatory labels.
:Except that liberal means different things in different parts of the world. In the US, liberal might mean left-wing whereas in France, liberal means the economic liberalism typical of the US therefore is more associated with righ-wing politics. As such it is not a useful label. Are left- and right-wing really inflammatory? (Ajkgordon 08:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: I removed the following:
:Other professionals who work for international companies or over the Internet complain that the 35-hour workweek hamstrings their productivity and puts them at a distinct disadvantage compared to their counterparts in countries that do not have such policies.
This is:
* Unsourced — where were those complaints reported?
* Vague — which professionals? How many are they?
And it frankly looks like something lifted from UMP political campaigning, or from an American newspaper (on topics of French economic policy, US newspapers typically align themselves with the UMP). David.Monniaux 06:37, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial and POV

message: This[] page says that the law was introduced in January 2000, rather than Feburary 2000, as our article says. Who is correct? The Missing Piece 17:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source says otherwise 

message: I rm this: "The right-wing Raffarin administration also partially blamed the deaths during the heat wave of August 2003 on the 35-hour workweek; according to them, public hospitals were inadequately staffed to handle the number of patients because of the workweek law. The opposition has charged that Raffarin simply tries to lay the blame for his shortcomings and those of health minister Jean-François Mattei on others." Not only is it unsourced, but quite unencyclopedic. Lapaz 17:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After trying to translate the "history" section into proper English (not only was the thing obviously copy-pasted from fr:, but some words were not even translated), I removed it altogether. It belongs to a "history of labour laws in France" article, or something like this. Furthermore, I think that there is a strong implicit bias in starting a section with "Limitations of the workweek of children" as if the 35 hours were in direct continuation with this ; one could as well put abolition of slavery on top of the list. Rama 09:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content 

message: BBC News homepage is saying that it has been scrapped. Don't know enough about it, but someone else who does can update accordingly. Anonymous.--92.9.135.215 (talk) 00:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No it hasn't. French politicians never scrap laws, they don't have the courage to. Which is ridiculous in some cases, because instead they take 15 years to make 42 laws that bypass the original one. Another example is the ISF (Impôt Sur la Fortune), a tax on wealth that the right-wing hate but dare not to overturn, instead they made several "fiscal shield" laws. Aesma (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Updating 

message: I propose that 35-hour workweek be merged into France's 35-Hour Workweek. I think that the content in these articles can easily be merged and the article will be of a reasonable size. Bergmanucsd (talk) 04:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 04:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal