lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:Voyager 1 entering heliosheath region.jpg

message: why is this a featured picture? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.129.218.133 (talk • contribs).
:See Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Voyager 1 entering heliosheath region — Jack · talk · 17:17, Wednesday, 13 June 2007
It looks so horribly exaggerated in the artistic "freedoms" taken that it may no doubt confuse space science novices. Sure, sometimes things like scales are wrong (and this one is no exception), but here it's introducing some kind of fire when these parts are not visible at all. If an image is intended to illustrate concepts of gravity fields, the heliopause and things like that, I'd much rather prefer something like a more stylized/schematic drawing than this flashy picture. Because then it is at least usually understood nothing of it is invented by the artist, but just visualized for explaining the concepts. — Northgrove 10:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite frankly, it (rather amusingly) reminds me of the fire and dragons found at the edges of maps of "the world" in past centuries. It seems that perhaps we haven't progressed as much as we may think we have. :) --Craig (t|c) 08:36, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

message: :Outdated model as of 2009 (See IBEX results). Recommend disuse. Fotaun (talk) 19:24, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated
Talk:OTMA

message: How was this rendered in the Cyrillic alphabet?  Anyone know?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Haverpopper (talk • contribs) 
: Here is the Cyrillic form: 'ОТМА' - it is indistinguishable in print. I just made a redirect to this page, but I think a note could also be included. Imaginatorium (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Cyrillic
Talk:Darwin Falls

message: I would've never guessed that waterfalls could exist in Death Valley. - Patricknoddy 2:27pm, January 14, 2007
:I was surprised too, then I found out there are at least 4 perennial streams and a few waterfalls (although I don't know if the other falls are also perennial).  If want to see how crammed this natural feature is, just check out the sat photo and how it's a small sliver of green wedged into a very bleak landscape.  I took all the photos and I had to show how the approach goes from nothing to a riparian area complete with waterfall in only 20-30 minutes of walking. --Bobak 20:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Gewargis III

message: WP style (HERE) states that "For bishops of Syriac tradition (Oriental Orthodox and Catholic) the title "Mar" is not used in the article name unless necessary for disambiguation or for conformance with actual usage". Is this individual never referred to simply as "Gewargis Sliwa"? --Presearch (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drop "Mar" in title of page? 
Talk:Christian David Ginsburg

message: Funny, the article says nothing whatever about his conversion to Christianity.  Please supplement.
:There is quite a lot of good information on this here, including quotes, references and links. Much of it could be incorporated into the article by whoever is interested in doing so. Dovi 11:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's in the second line.  I added it yesterday, after seeing S's exposition.  —Dfass 20:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Apostacy

message: Presumably he took the name "Christian" on conversion. Has anyone seen sources to that effect? Oncenawhile (talk) 19:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:School of Nisibis

message: I have provided 2 academic sources but they do not show up after you click on the 1st and 2nd citations. Can someone fix this. Here are the links: http://books.google.com/books?id=pXstU5Kt-_kC&pg=PA182&dq=school+of+nisibis+assyrian#PPA181,M1
http://books.google.com/books?id=_7RD2jwMU2wC&pg=PA91&dq=school+of+nisibis+assyrian
Ninevite (talk) 05:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Took awhile, but fixed now.  :) --Elonka 01:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with Citations for the first sentence 
Talk:List of Maronite patriarchs of Antioch

message: This ancient list of patriarchs seems fictional. I cannot verify them online except through sources that have copied Wikipedia. NONE of the people seem to exist outside that referent which is unusual, to say the least. Needs exceptional scholarly reference at this point. Student7 (talk) 00:55, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 310-410

message: I moved this page from "list of maronite catholic patriarchs" to "list of maronite patriarchs", the first patriarchs had no affiliation to the catholic church so the title was misleading and inaccurate Eli+ 18:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: The reference to resignation because of passing a legal is incorrect. There is no age established by Canon Law for the retirement of patriarchs of the Eastern Churches. While the Maronites Patriarchs may elect to retire at a given age, they are not required to do so - unless the Maronites have built such a requirement into their own particular law? Anyone know? Irish Melkite (talk) 03:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed A ntv (talk) 05:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Age

message: The note alongside the name of Paul Peter Meouchi indicates that he was 'appointed by Pope Pius XII. It may be intended to indicate that he was apppointed as a Cardinal by Pius XII but, as it reads, it suggests that he was appointed as Patriarch by him, which was not the case. Someone needs to delete it - I tried but had issues w/ the format falling apart and undid the change Irish Melkite (talk) 04:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed A ntv (talk) 05:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Appointed By

message: "In the list here below the names shifted on the right are not included in the incomplete Assemani's list and derive from the Bejjeh's list." - ??? there are no names 'shifted on the right' (presumably meaning 'right-justified') - all appear to have the same justification. Irish Melkite (talk) 15:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What shift?
Talk:Ute Pass (Rampart Range)

message: Many visitors to this page may expect a page describing the Canyon between Cascade, Colorado and Manitou Springs, Colorado. While many locals, like myself, refer to it as "Ute Pass", or just "the Pass", it is not a pass at all.  From what I can discover, its name is actually Fountain Creek Canyon.
A mountain pass is actually the highest point on a route going between two mountains.  Fountain Creek Canyon is continuously sloped (otherwise Fountain Creek wouldn't run down it), so it can't be a pass.
I've been thinking about creating a page for Fountain Creek Canyon and linking to it from here.  But for now, can we agree that Ute Pass is the highest point that US 24 goes through while passing through the Rampart Range, and that it's west of Cascade, Woodland Park, and just west of Divide?  In that case, it's nowhere near El Paso County.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ken g6 (talk • contribs) 02:31, August 29, 2007 (UTC) 
There are at least two Ute Passes in Colorado. There is another Ute Pass just north of Silverthorne, Colorado at 9,583 feet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.173.240.58 (talk) 18:14, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  This article does indicate a second Ute Pass; but cross-referencing with the Henderson molybdenum mine article, I wonder if it's actually Jones Pass (Colorado)? -- Ken_g6 (factors | composites) 05:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ute Pass vs. [[Fountain Creek]] Canyon
Talk:Inza Wood Middle School

message: This article was full of unreasonable things:
"Wood is an amazing school with wonderful students. However, one particular student stands above the rest, Chase Bennington, 8th grade. "His intelligence surpasses our best expectations" says Soisson. He does not only sucseed academicly but in other areas too. He won the schools final baksetball game with 2 broken legs, while wrestling a grizzly bear. He holds many records among them a 100m time of .02s. He is truly the shining star of Wood. Another great athelete at wood is so famous she is known only as "The Furoius Furrow" she is the only soccer player on the schools team and still keeps the schools record undefeted. Her goals per game ranged from 59-41190682. She has already been recruited to the national soccer team but declined saying "I would like to stay with my friends because they always come first". Yes also an amazing star at wood."
I've removed all that, fixed up some of the grammar and style, and added it to appropriate categories. --  Pinball22 17:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 10th 2007 

message: If this is indeed a school project, your teacher needs to read Wikipedia:School and university projects. If your teacher needs proof that you indeed vandalized a wikipedia page as part of your project, then s/he can look at the page history. If the page ends up being deleted, s/he can contact me and I can get an administrator to help retrieve the information. Katr67 22:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  School project? 

message: I think that this article should be protected. People are contantly vandalizing and whatnot, and creating new accounts just to vandalize this page. I'd like to nominate it to be protected, but I don't know how.
BTW, why is it up for deletion? Other schools have their own page. This IS an encyclopedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PKKnoHaseo-san (talk • contribs) 02:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Every other school has an article" is not sufficient reason for having an article. Please read WP:NOTE about notability and also User:Dpbsmith/BEEFSTEW for one user's ideas about how to make a good-quality high school article--these ideas can also be applied to junior high school articles. Katr67 04:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

text: P.S. We can address protection after the afd. Katr67 04:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection nomination
Talk:Un-cape Parrot

message: The new classification is clear, but it seems to me, that some web-sites still use old the classification (or both classifications) and so this can be a confusing subject.  Please double check to see what classification your references or literature sources are using. Snowman 17:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As is says on the page, the classification is controversial and not widely accepted. The split to Un-Cape Parrot is not widely accepted and the old classification of this taxa as a subspecies of the Cape Parrot is generally used. This page is an addendum to the Cape Parrot page. It could be merged into the Cape Parrot page. Snowman (talk) 08:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing names
Talk:Jean Baptiste Casmiere Breschard

message: Standard spelling is Casimir. Previous spelling might have arisen from a poorly transcribed early document.
-------------------
FOR REFERENCE ONLY: A new book has been published concerning the Circus of Pepin and Breschard. For more information, www.CircusRider.org 76.247.137.66 (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Caesar (McCullough novel)

message: From the what links here feature I gather that this novel is part of Colleen McCullough's Masters of Rome series. Can someone who knows the book 1) confirm this, 2) rewrite the article as being about a work of fiction and 3) add a basic infobox? I'm at a total loss. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 17:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Context?
Talk:Peckforton Hills

message: The article as currently written implies that the name applies only to the northern part of the range which extends from Maiden Castle in the south to the outlier of Beeston Castle Hill in the north. I have always taken it to include the entire 'massif' including outliers such as Bolesworth Hill, Hart Hill and King James's Hill etc.  Individual useage may differ - what is the consensus? Geopersona (talk) 07:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That was my understanding, based on local usage and the OS 1:25,000 labelling. However, I don't have a reference that discusses the ridge in detail. What do your sources state? Espresso Addict (talk) 07:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  As far as OS labelling goes, OS have a modern habit of restricting the names of areas of country of great extent to a much smaller part of the map face than would seem appropriate. It was not always so. An example is that of Cumbrian Mountains on OS Explorer OL4 The English Lakes: north-western area where that title extends across less than 8cm of the map face ie less than 2 grid squares and could be mistaken by someone quite unfamiliar with the area as a reference only to the local piece of high ground between Thirlmere, Watendlath and Borrowdale. I've not yet been able to lay my hands on any references beyond OS which delineate the extent of the Peckforton Hills. My own personal observations when I used to be a resident and frequent visitor to the area was that the term was used variably, certainly on occasion in the wider sense, but that doesn't count for the purposes of encyclopaedic content! Geopersona (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extent of the range
Talk:Burwardsley

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) 
Peter I. Vardy 20:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: Given the prolonged disruptioon caused by an anonymous IP user changing IP addresses to add the same incredible yet unverified information which is highly likely to be false to the article, I have semi-protected it. I will also consider putting in a checkuser request if attempts are attempted again, which may mean the ISP may be traced and informed.  DDStretch  (talk) 22:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-Protection
Talk:High school ice hockey in Pennsylvania

message: the team list was getting good. and then someone created that fourth column. now its all screwed up. nice...
:: fixed it for ya's. boo yah!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.76.32 (talk) 18:32, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  team list 

message: according to a 1981 philly inq papaer article the penna cup was started by the flyers because there was no penguins cup and they wanted someone to play the winner of the flyers cup. so that means the penna cup was not begun in 1970 whatever year. it should be changed. 
see Flyers Cup Dirk Pitt 17:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penna Cup 

message: Hey all! Noticed that this has not been touched in a long time but I added about a 150 championships missing throughout all the leagues and did a lot of research! Also added a few missing teams! AnonymousStrawberry (talk) 00:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2024 Update
Talk:Melkite Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch

message: Thanks, ArmindenArminden (talk) 22:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is the official, where the actual residence?
Talk:Netocracy

message: Its unclear to me why this article is included in the 'Basic forms of government' political series. It's not a form of government. It's a theoretical framework at best. I'm unaware of any nation/state that employs 'netocracy' as its form of government...? Anastrophe (talk) 18:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a system of government
Talk:Latin Patriarchate of Antioch

message: The running text from the century-old Catholic Encyclopedia says the patriarch at the time of the fall of Antioch was "Christian" while the list below states that it was Opizzo. Was that his episcopal name? or someone's just wrong? — LlywelynII 07:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a typo I suppose. His name was definitely Opizo - he's fairly well known, he was actually one of Pope Innocent IV's many nephews. Adam Bishop (talk) 21:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see you've already written a lengthy article about Opizzo Fieschi :) I think the confusion in the Catholic Encyclopdia stems from Eubel's Hierarchica catholica, which mentions a "Christianus" following Opizzo. But this cites a letter of Alexander IV to the patriarch, which doesn't mention him by name but does mention "Christians", so perhaps Eubel misread it. Eubel also cites a letter from Urban IV, but that one doesn't actually name the patriarch either. Since there are no other letters appointing a new patriarch, we can probably assume that Opizzo was patriarch until 1268. Adam Bishop (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

text: See also Hamilton's Latin Church in the Crusader States (p. 232), which mentions that Claude Cahen already proved that the supposed "Elias" and "Christian" after Opizo are due to misunderstanding of the sources. Adam Bishop (talk) 23:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify further, Hamilton cites Cahen's, Syrie du Nord, which explains why there were no patriarchs of Antioch named Elias and Christian - you can read it here, paragraphs 5 and 6, or about p. 662 in the actual book. Adam Bishop (talk) 18:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: So... something's wrong
Talk:Chris Shaffer

message: This article needs to cite its sources, as well as be cleaned up, and edited for point of view. By point of view, I'm referring to some of the grand words used to describe the artist, they're not appropriate for an encyclopedia entry.
:Agreed. I'm working on this.--Mrupert@gmail.com 13:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this link to Billboard can help with some source info: http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/retrieve_chart_history.do?model.vnuArtistId=147630&model.vnuAlbumId=322140
--jason@accessvision.tv
Please edit the article to address these problems, or the article will meet the criteria for deletion. Leebo86 17:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: That's a valid point. The article has been cleaned up a bit. The way you put quotation marks around "patrolling" makes it seem to me like you think I made it up for the purpose of harrassing new editors and their articles. Read about the recent change patrol if you want to learn more. The article still needs to be edited for POV and it needs reliable third party sources to establish notability. I apologize if I gave you the impression that I was simply commenting to be mean. Leebo86 21:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for the apology - i apologize if i was a bit snippy.  I will continue to update this article over the next few days, and i welcome editing and/or third party verification.  Jaileer 21:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV, cleanup needed, original research
Talk:Earl of Chester

message: on Googlebooks (that helped correcting a misspelling)
https://books.google.com/books?id=VKFfAAAAcAAJ&dq=%22Office+of+the+sheriff+in+rents+and%22+casualties&source=gbs_navlinks_s
:Title	The History of the County Palatine of Chester
:Author	J. H. HANSHALL
:Publisher	J. Fletcher, sold by the author, 1817
:Original from	The British Library
:Digitized	Nov 10, 2014
:Length	27 pages
Shenme (talk) 20:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found a possible reference book 

message: Under the heading "County Palatine," the following statement is made: 
"Prince Charles was created Earl of Chester on 26 July 1968, when he was also made Prince of Wales."
Many other sources I have seen, including Wikipedia's own article on the title "Prince of Wales," indicate that the date that Prince Charles became Prince of Wales (and therefore also Earl of Chester) was precisely 10 years earlier: July 26, 1958. Therefore I suggest that a correction may be warranted.
162.227.175.17 (talk) 06:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error in date that Prince Charles, son of Queen Elizabeth II, became Earl of Chester. 

message: Is this just an honorary title, or does it actually come with land or something? -- Beland (talk) 19:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What comes with the title? 

message: I removed the following text, "; see the Prince Henry's Charter Case (1611) Law Reports: 1 Bulst 133; 80 ER 827)", because a Google search found only this selfsame Wikipedia article. The reference "Law Reports: 1 Bulst 133; 80 ER 827" is thus meaningless. It leads nowhere that an ordinary reader of this article can find. If you know how to make this reference go to the actual "Law Reports" text, please restore this reference. Nick Beeson (talk) 16:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulst
Talk:BAPTA

message: Since Ca2+ is (obviously) divalent, and each carboxylate is monovalent, I'd guess that each end of the molecule binds to one Ca2+ ion, thus each molecule of BAPTA only binds two Ca2+ ions, and not four as is suggested in the article.  That's just my chemical intuition, though, and I don't have any evidence, really to support that.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alkaloids (talk • contribs).
:Looks like you are right.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 18:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: divalent
Talk:George of Beltan

message: The two lines of this article are completely, absolutely and definitely untrue. George of Antioch was a Syriac Orthodox (monophysite) patriarch, not a Byzantine. There was no oriental patriarch present at the Second Council of Nicaea, and George simply died in 790.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.24.175.76 (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:1st Marine Infantry Parachute Regiment

message: This Article was recently moved to 1st Naval Infantry Parachute Regiment without discussion or even an edit summary to explain why it was move. I would like to move it back to 1st Marine Infantry Parachute Regiment because that is the more common name in english. Carl Logan 08:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem, it seems that there are now basically two of the same article with different names. One of these articles should be deleted. AustralianRupert (talk) 22:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction. Belay my last – the first article is now a redirect. Apologies. You may continue to fire at will, or at me...I really should check that they 'safety' is on. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 22:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Sponne School

message: Why was this article flagged for not citing sources? I'm just curious because it does include links to sources... Are there just not enough of them? 88.109.91.194 18:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello Editor,
In the info box on the right hand side of the "Sponne School" page, it is stated that the Headteacher of Sponne School is "Mr Iain Massey". This is factually incorrect. The Executive Headteacher of the school (and 4 others in the area) is Dr Jamie Clarke. The Sponne "Head of School" (this is not the same as Headteacher) is Mr Iain Massey. So, to avoid ambiguity, either the title "Headteacher" should be changed to "Head of School" or the title "Headteacher" should be changed to "Executive Headteacher" and the name changed to "Dr Jamie Clarke", depending on what the editor believes is appropriate.
Many thanks for reading this edit request.
Djakadam (talk) 19:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 19:59, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

text: Not done: per above — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2016