lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Press pass

message: refs 17, 19 and 20 are all bad  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.27.121.20 (talk) 11:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

message: Nice.  I can't believe there wasn't an article about this before.  Badagnani 03:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Yeah, that surprized me too! --Xiaphias 05:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice article 

message: This article passed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of May 8, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Pass
:2. Factually accurate?: Pass
:3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
:4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
:5. Article stability? Pass
:6. Images?: Pass
— The Sunshine Man 11:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful "good article" nomination

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Lampman (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps

message: This article is utter nonsense and should be pulled. Of COURSE editors and photographers can have press passes! 
I am an editor and also work as a photographer, and have a UK press pass, so know what I am talking about. Unlike the author of this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.233.152 (talk) 11:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You must be referring to the section on police press passes: generally editors are NOT eligible for this type of pass, though of course it'll vary by jurisdiction. --Xiaphias (talk) 19:34, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [anonymous comment Jun-7-2009]

message: A number of IPs have been repeatedly inserting/reverting links to sellers of fake press passes, specifically: 
* "International Association of Press Photographers" whose "address" is a virtual office in Miami (i.e. a facade.)
* "United States Press Agency" exists just to sell "memberships" and press passes
Anon IPs: 
* ;  ; ; ; 
-HidariMigi (talk) 03:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous IPs reinserting fake sites into external links
Talk:International Association of Methodist-related Schools, Colleges, and Universities

message: Look, I attend the University of Puget Sound.  It is not affiliated at all with the Methodist Church.  The IAMSCU list is quite simply wrong.  It says the denomination is Methodist when, in fact, if you asked any university administrator or checked the university's website you would find that we have NO religious affiliation or denomination. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kroush (talk • contribs) 
:There has already been some discussion of this at Template talk:MethodistColleges.  Perhaps you would like to join the discussion rather than simply reverting other edits to that template.  The problem may in part be with the use of the word, "affiliated." -MrFizyx 05:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is actually quite simple.  UPS is NOT Methodist and people are saying that it is.  Perhaps you should discuss it before adding it back.  It's very black and white.  UPS is not a Methodist university.  Anyone who says otherwise is just plain wrong. KDR 11:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: However the article states that Puget Sound is not  Methodist denomination, but historically affiliated with the Methodist church and still involved in there organizations. Perhaps there should be a specific reference made to Puget Sound, within the article. But I see no objection to fact that Puget Sound is a member to this organization. - thank you  Astuishin 15:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I've posted my suggestion at Template talk:MethodistColleges.  Why don't we try to keep the conversation centralized on that page.  -MrFizyx 16:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: University of Puget Sound

message: Dear User:Manning954. You were correct in removing University of Southern California, Vanderbilt University, and Wesleyan University from the list as those institutions are not listed at the International Association of Methodist-related Schools, Colleges, and Universities' website. However, the University of Puget Sound and Syracuse University mantain an affiliation with The United Methodist Church and are listed on the IAMSCU's website along with the latest 2011 Directory of United Methodist-Related Schools, Colleges, Universities, and Theological Schools. As such I am restoring those institutions. Thanks, AnupamTalk 23:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:Manning954's removals
Talk:Lilium pardalinum subsp. pitkinense

message: Is due to the following factors:
*a. Listing as an endangered species
*b. Endemic to a narrow range within the San Francisco Bay Area (in fact, within Sonoma County solely)
*c. Beauty and stature of plant
*d. Role in evaluating development proposals in southwestern Sonoma County      Anlace 01:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: My understanding is that subspecies names are always lower case and never capitalised, even when they are named after a place (as in this example) or after a person - ie it should be written Lilium pardalinum subsp. pitkinense 86.140.131.87 09:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lower case is now used. Comment noted. Anlace 18:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature

message: These flowers are NOT yellow-green, please reread and verify what you post!  KP Botany 02:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color 
Talk:Meivazhi

message: --It is seen that someone had suggested that this article be split into a new article titled "Salai Aandavargal". Please refer to an earlier discussion on Articles for Deletion:Salai Aandavargal and let everyone know your think. Darkxblade1 (talk) 11:53, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think someone had better spend their time actually sourcing this article, as the split won't happen unless the bio is supported by reliable sources; and eventually this article will be gutted to include only material which is sourced to reliable third-party sources. Skyerise (talk) 13:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting
Talk:Gerhard Boldt

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The article quotes extensively from Boldt, while the footnote states that these supposedly first-hand accounts may have been a fabrication. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic content
Talk:Engelmann Stadium

message: Whole article is POV and not very encyclopedic. Someone with knowledge of the subject should consider an overhaul. - Jirt 19:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV, not encyclopedic

message: The Wikipedia page for Engelmann Field requires revision.  Engelmann Field has been renamed to Laura Moynihan Field, a name that describes the space covered by the Polytan turf competition surface, and surrounded by a fence.  The structures around Laura Moynihan Field, including sidewalks and viewing stands, are now referred to as Engelmann Stadium.
The correct phrase to describe the overall venue would be "Laura Moynihan Field at Engelmann Stadium."  The revision will directly impact Facebook Places, which incorrectly cites the currently incorrect and unrevised Wikipedia page.  Please make the revision promptly, to allow Facebook Places to also be improved to the correct place names.
Engelmann Stadium is correct.  Laura Moynihan Field is correct.  "Laura Moynihan Field at Engelmann Stadium" is correct.  Engelmann Field is no longer correct.
A full page description of Laura Moynihan Field at Engelmann Stadium is located on Page 55 of the current 2013 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Men's Soccer Media Guide, located at http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/wiml/sports/m-soccer/auto_pdf/2013-14/misc_non_event/2013_MSOC_media_guide.pdf http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/wiml/sports/m-soccer/auto_pdf/2013-14/misc_non_event/2013_MSOC_media_guide.pdf
A second citation in support of this Page Title Edit Request is from Google Maps.  The displayed Google map is correctly identified, with place names "Engelmann Stadium" and "Moynihan Field."  
https://www.google.com/maps?q=2033+East+Hartford+Avenue,+Milwaukee,+WI&hl=en&ll=43.077007,-87.884713&spn=0.00674,0.016426&sll=43.076843,-87.88511&sspn=0.00674,0.016426&geocode=FWFlkQId5PDC-im_Nq2RLh8FiDGAmIwDlfZxMw&oq=2033+East+Hartford+Avenue&t=h&dirflg=r&ttype=now&noexp=0&noal=0&sort=def&hnear=2033+E+Hartford+Ave,+Milwaukee,+Wisconsin+53211&z=17&start=0 https://www.google.com/maps?q=2033+East+Hartford+Avenue,+Milwaukee,+WI&hl=en&ll=43.077007,-87.884713&spn=0.00674,0.016426&sll=43.076843,-87.88511&sspn=0.00674,0.016426&geocode=FWFlkQId5PDC-im_Nq2RLh8FiDGAmIwDlfZxMw&oq=2033+East+Hartford+Avenue&t=h&dirflg=r&ttype=now&noexp=0&noal=0&sort=def&hnear=2033+E+Hartford+Ave,+Milwaukee,+Wisconsin+53211&z=17&start=0  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.128.218.92 (talk) 08:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 22 October 2013
Talk:Jester's privilege

message: Does it belong more to Wiktionary than Wikipedia? Cema 01:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is encyclopedic content for this topic. Martin Luther invoked the Jester's privilege in one of his works. I'll add it to the article. There should be a lot more literary works where this privilege is used in one way or other. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

message: I know it as "jester's license" ..name it in the article? do a redirect? --217.84.85.167 (talk) 17:41, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jester's license?
Talk:Faked death

message: Andy Kaufman is another good example of speculated pseudocide. He was a famous liar and his career was full of elaborate rouses, when he died people thought he faked it. Bob Zmuda, a very close associate, even wrote about the theories validity. 2604:3D08:3380:EE00:18EF:B450:552D:907B (talk) 13:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andy Kaufman for speculations? 

message: "uncovered after she claimed to have died during the COVID-19 pandemic."
I know what this phrase is trying to say but it reads oddly. Someone else could have claimed that she died, or she could have faked her own death but suggesting she, herself, claimed to have died just sounds wrong somehow.
Anyone have a problem if I change it to "faked her own death"?
46.227.49.108 (talk) 14:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it! Making things clearer and not worse is always a good idea. DMacks (talk) 14:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, done.  (My first ever edit to a Wikipedia article!) 46.227.49.108 (talk) 11:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the contribution. DMacks (talk) 12:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sounds strange 

message: Hello, I was just wondering if the list this article contains is only for individuals found to have faked their own death. I just came across two articles about ex-CIA operatives who went "rogue" who are accused of faking their own death so I came to this article but I'm guessing that it is not for cases where it is just suspected that someone faked their death. Does that sound accurate? I don't see any hidden notes that provide a guideline for whom to include. Thanks for any clarity you can provide. Liz Read! Talk! 19:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Space Science Fiction Magazine

message: I guess this is about as short as they get, which means there ain't much that can go wrong...passing Chubbles 07:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: Even though this article didn't get promoted, it's still quality work and a nice reference. Thanks for bringing it up to high standards.—RJH (talk) 15:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; I appreciate it.  And thanks for the support at FAC; your reorganization suggestion definitely improved the article. Mike Christie (talk) 01:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not promoted
Talk:Music stand

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 01:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-04-3 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: However, they did not become popular until the late 14th century, when German and Swiss composers decided that they had a certain air of efficiency about them.
I can let the first half of this sentence slide, but not the second half. Can we find a reference that backs this up? It not only sounds odd but is completely unencyclopedic.  Mr Instamatic (talk) 16:02, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Air of efficiency"? 

message: I have noticed a lack of reliable sources in this article, particularly in the first paragraph. Please assist in improving this issue. Thanks, Matthewethanchowtoy (talk) 21:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of reliable sources
Talk:Board of education

message: I just wanted to say hello.  My Wiki user ID is a word play on 'Board of education'!  This is my first edit, so I want it to be on a special page that is close to me.  --Bored of Education (talk) 02:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello 

message: This term is also used colloquially to refer to corporal punishment in schools, such as paddling as a punishment. ("If you do not behave this will be taken up with the board of education.")72.87.131.203 (talk) 06:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colloquial term for corporal punishment in school 

message: Article: List of school districts in Ontario
"There are 72 school boards in Ontario ... "--Torontonian1 (talk) 21:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  School boards in Ontario, Canada 

message: There could be a lot more information to help the reader to fully understand the historical context behind the formation and utility of the Board of Education. What might help is if there was a section that explained the Board of Education’s origination and where exactly it originated. There could also be a note on how successful the first Board of Education was and how its implementation drastically changed the modern school system. Then from there we could pick apart its evolution into the modern form that we see today (if there was a transformation at all). You could also analyze the different methods that have been used and are currently used to choose Board Members and the impact of that decision. Another question that could be addressed is why having a Board of Education is necessary and why it is beneficial to an area.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dng21 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Improvements  

message: "The elected council determines the educational policy in a small regional area, such as a city, county, state, or province. Frequently, a board of directors power with a larger institution, such as a higher government's department of education. The name of such board is also often used to refer to the school system under such board's control." doesn't actually make any sense.  The reference provided doesn't link to any viable resource, so the intended meaning is unclear. noisyoldwalrus 18:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syntactical Error
Talk:Sydney Ringer

message: The answer is 1834 1835 1836 only one answer could be the right one. The sources are difficult to interprete.--Stone (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: When was he born

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20061109225010/http://www.whonamedit.com/doctor.cfm/1905.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Acura ARX-01

message: I think that now that Honda has changed the name from Acura to HPD that the redirect should be the other way around. This is the case for both ALMS and Le Mans. Any objections? Bjmullan (talk) 20:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's argueable whether or not the name should change.  Although now entered by HPD, the car is still more commonly known by its Acura title.  Also, with rule changes coming in LMP, the 2010 HPD name may be the only year in which this title is used.  Common name may override the most recent name in this case. The359 (Talk) 21:52, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is time to rename this article HPD.... Bjmullan (talk) 23:46, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of redirect
Talk:Ch'od

message: This picture seems to go against SHB picture policy as Ch'od isn't really shown as being the main focus of the image.
He is in fact farther back in the picture. I don't really have an image to replace it with. So if someone could find a more 'focused' picture that would be great. Wormdundee (talk) 01:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: SHB Picture
Talk:Hexahedron

message: oh dear this is confusing. what are the actual translations of all the Platonic soldidS? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.131.117 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 2 April 2007
: What do you mean by "actual translations"?  —Tamfang 07:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

message: pentagrammic pyramid. why didn't you include that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.185.3.0 (talk) 00:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like there is an unstated restriction to non-intersecting faces here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:4408:1C43:CD00:0:0:0:2 (talk) 17:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  star hexahedron 

message: The categorization of cuboids doesn't have a reference, its not clear what counts as distinct.  Except for the last two, they have different symmetry groups.  But there are more symmetry groups (or representations) you can get with cuboids:
* A "square prism" with two squares and four (congruent) rectangles, symmetry group order 16.
* A "rhombic prism" with two rhombi and four rectangles, symmetry group order 8 (but unlike the frustrum has inversion symmetry).
* The parallelepiped with two rhombi and four congruent parallelograms, symmetry group order 4.  (Mirror plane plus inversion).
* Two kites connected by rectangles, again symmetry group order 4.
* A skewed variant of the latter (two kites, four parallelograms), symmetry group order 2, but mirror symmetry not inversion symmetry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:4408:1C43:CD00:0:0:0:2 (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  other cuboids
Talk:Seminal vesicles

message: This articles states that the "Prostatic secretion is acidic", but on the articles for prostate is says "The function of the prostate is to store and secrete a slightly alkaline (pH 7.29) fluid". The bulbourethral gland is producing acidic secretion, does the confusion come from there ? --Tsaitgaist (talk) 20:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The phrase first ejaculate fractions is confusing. Could someone clarify whether "first" refers to: the first spurts of an ejaculation? or the first ejaculation in a series? This phrase also occurs verbatim on the prostate page.
The speculation about "developmental rest" and "spermicidal plug" is unreferenced. I have flagged it and moved it, because the WP:Reliable source from SUNY Stony Brook cited on this page explains that the alkalinity of seminal vesicle fluid complements/balances the acidity of prostatic fluid. The prostate page explicitly describes the alkalinity as serving the function of changing the pH of the vagina. Evolutionary speculation is secondary here. Martindo (talk) 22:28, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function 

message: how long seminal vesicles can store seminal fluid? And where does that fluid go if we don't ejaculate for some days or months? Ravisingh4106 (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  how long seminal vesicles can store seminal fluid? And where does that fluid go if we don't ejaculate for some days or months?
Talk:Sikorsky (comics)

message: If memory serves, back in the 80s Kitty Pryde (Ariel/Sprite/Shadowcat) had a pet dragon named Sikorsky. Should we ref. it on this page? I don't remember much about that dragon, but I could probably track something down on the net. -- Narsil (talk) 23:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: D'oh! The dragon was named Lockheed, not Sikorsky. Never mind! -- Narsil (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No biggie.  :) BOZ (talk) 01:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kitty Pryde's pet dragon? 

message: Is this original research? I could not find any mention of this idea on the X-Men wiki or the broader web. In fact the closest one to it that is not just reviewing the comic still only says looks like a mechanical dragonfly. 
Kevonni  —Preceding undated comment added 05:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robot?
Talk:Massachusetts Educational Theater Guild

message: Just as a point of order in light of the recent vandalism, St. Johns DID NOT GO OVER. I work on the crew at finals and I am 100% confident that they just happened to get very lucky in coming in with a second to spare. So stop being bitter. Bostongaspark 02:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: It's 2008. The results from the preliminary round are available online, as they happened last Saturday (I was there). Shouldn't they be here, rather than last year's results? Sectori (talk) 03:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It's 2008
Talk:Excuse

message: I request that this article be split into two:  excuse (jurisprudence) [or excuse (law)] and excuse--the former to deal with the bulk of what this article is about, and the latter to deal with the use of excuses in everyday life.  (By the way I suggest that this be put to a vote, and if the answer is "no," then I am 100% okay with that.)  38.100.34.2 02:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2007
Talk:Megan Blake

message: I finally found a source that this person is also the Miss Georgia.  http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ/MGArticle/WSJ_RelishArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1149193099698 --After Midnight 0001 02:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But the above website is not accessible.  Leezaroy (talk) 13:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @After Midnight and @Leezaroy, An archive of that page is available here, Eddie Blick (talk) 01:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same person