lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Title 11

message: Okay, the NPOV boilerplate I added is really an understatement.  Anyone should be able to notice the NPOV.  Additionally, there is no general overview of the legislation before jumping right into criticism of the Act.  Also, I'm no legal expert here, but is Title 11 the same thing as this Act, or did this Act just amend Title 11 (more likely)?  Has it been signed into law yet, if not, where is it in the process?  Due to the extreme lack of unbiased information, I'd recommend that a knowledgable Wikipedian check the accuracy.
I wasn't sure whether to put this under NPOV, accuracy dispute or cleanup. Sometimes I think a simple VFD would be better. Apatterno 13:35, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV, poor writing and inaccuracy
Talk:Thomas Lipton

message: As of the late 1990s (but at least not for the last few years), the package (the 16-teabag one, at least) featured a 3-tone posterized portrait of Lipton, in a nautical billed cap (with a medallion) and brandishing a teacup, perhaps a flattering rendition of the appearance he made as of the 1909 photo. (Particularly, the mustache is much narrower and more horizontal on the box.) It is accompanied by a small "Thomas JLipton" [sic] signature, in black.   Perhaps worth mention, if a little more detail can be found.--Jerzy•t 04:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait 

message: Where did 1848 come from? All other sources give 1850. Thisdaytrivia (talk) 05:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 
Talk:Military Auxiliary Radio System

message: It should be mentioned that this is an american program. They do not hold a monopoly on all thing military.--Madison Gray 16:29, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's pretty obvious from the article that this is a program of the United States military.  It's unclear what the objection is about.--Kharker (talk) 16:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  American bias 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 20:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I'm concerned about the tone of the article. It comes across as promotional, almost like a press release.
Phrases like:
* "The Military Affiliate Radio System is just as active today as it ever was"
* "MARS continues to be very active today"
* "Their efforts were very successful"
Should be replaced by objective measures of success or activity to make the article more neutral.
twilsonb (talk) 00:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional Tone (Newsrelease) 

message: Since everything in  is included in
, shouldn't  be removed?
--K6PDG Patrick (talk) 21:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant navbox 

message: The MARS community has had the unfortunate tendency to promulgate the understanding that the AARS was a group of radio amateurs that trained the US Army Signal Corps in the use of radios. This is absolutely wrong. Please see the following monograph for an in depth history of the AARS:  Army Amateur Radio System: 1925-1941. http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4013coll3/id/2634  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AARS.history (talk • contribs) 19:30, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  AARS Misinformation
Talk:Pam Grier

message: The article says Pam Grier is a PhD but she’s not actually, those are honorary degrees. See 
https://50bold.com/pam-grier-is-living-her-best-life/
PAM: I was given an Honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters from the University of Maryland Eastern Shore and I also received an Honorary Doctorate of Science from Langston University, a historically Black university of agriculture in Oklahoma.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1017:B81C:F058:9108:1FF6:B44C:1284 (talk) 18:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a PhD
Talk:Bright, Indiana

message: Glad to see my hometown isn't important. 69.61.190.221 04:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gulivoire Park, Indiana

message: This area was NEVER called gulivoire park.  It is and always has been named: Gilmer Park.  It was subdivided from property owned by Mr. Gilmer.  I know this because I lived there.  I also looked up the records in St. Joseph County.
PLEASE correct this error.  It is driving us all crazy.
Thanks,
Hope Vollmer
Hope Vollmer (talk) 20:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted your unsourced edits. Gilmer Park is not Gulivoire Park, it appears to be a seperate unincorporated community, that is not a CDP like Gulivoire Park is. Evking22 (talk) 20:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

message: Hi,  
You have an area of land in St. Joseph County Indiana listed as Gulivoire park.  I would like to know how it came about this name because it has always been referred to by residents as GILMER PARK.  Approximately 25 years ago it was referred to as Gilmer on weather maps, etc.  Can you tell me how this changed?  I am researching for an article.  I see that it shows Gilmer Park as a subdivision of this area but believe that is inaccurate.  People who live is other subdivions in this area have always referred to it as GILMER Park.  Can you please let me know how this came to be.  I have found a logical explanation of who Gilmer might be but nothing of Gulivoire.
Thank you 24.1.134.103 (talk) 15:44, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request Edit
Talk:Henryville, Indiana

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  21:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: I don't have the time now, but someone might want to add a note about the Henryville Indiana Correctional Facility: http://www.in.gov/idoc/3043.htm -- Dan Griscom (talk) 13:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henryville Correctional Facility 
Talk:North Terre Haute, Indiana

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—2605:A000:1C01:C63A:A8DE:4952:599E:CDE7 (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't explained what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article. A source is given for them, and the location they specify appears to be within the CDP. If you still think that there is an errpr, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Roselawn, Indiana

message: Would the crash of a small commuter aircraft (the American Eagle plane) thirteen or fourteen years ago still be notable? Perhaps this is no longer an important item of knowledge about Roselawn? Would all agree to its graceful removal? Xenophon777 (talk) 17:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming no one objects... Xenophon777 (talk) 23:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would still be notable, considering 68 people died in the accident. I even found a tribute video on YouTube. What if I could put a 'See Also' section on this article and add the link to the American Eagle crash article? And003 (talk) 07:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that it's terribly relevant to Roselawn. It has no real lasting effect on Roselawn today, and is almost more like something which would go in a [discouraged] "Trivia Section." That the crash would be "trivia" is not meant to trivialize the tragedy, pain, and loss of the passengers, their families, American stockholders... (genuinely)... but it really doesn't have much to say or add about Roselawn. I'd think it a whole lot more relevant in an article on commuter airline crashes in the US, or on lists of such crashes. On the other hand, if you have non-original-research citations to articles on a lasting effect on the town, then that might by all means be different, IMHO. Xenophon777 (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have located 2 articles that should constitute non-original research. You can find them here:nwi.com: Crash Still Stings (October 31, 2009)nwi.com: Flight 4184 victims remembered, families praised (Nov. 1, 2009)If these are acceptable, let me know. And003 (talk) 04:46, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. Xenophon777 (talk) 20:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

text: I added the crash to the new History section, to which it certainly seems relevant.- Gilliam (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: American Eagle crash
Talk:Kainuu

message: Kainuu should have its own history section since it's nowhere near Ostrobothnia and it's not very wiki to send readers to a wild goose chase about the history of the place. --Thorri 15:12, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Kainuu needs own history

message: Added article Origin of the name Kainuu. --Drieakko 20:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name Kainuu 
Talk:Gustav Lindenthal

message: There's a good picture of Lindenthal at . I've (just now) emailed the Historical Society which was exhibiting the picture. Please don't upload it until they respond with information about its source and creation date. Lindenthal died in 1935, so the picture could still be under copyright. On the other hand, the Hell Gate Bridge, which the site is all about, was completed in 1916. So it could go either way; we'll have to wait and see. grendel|khan 14:17, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
:Still no response. I'm poking at them again to see if they'll be more helpful now. grendel|khan 12:25, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Indiana Institute of Technology

message: I just added half a dozen programs that were not listed, including the new S.E, Networking, and Elem. Ed. programs that are new this year. 
Go Warriors? hehehe.
Liastnir 18:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added degrees 

message: Several of the listed alums don't appear to pass Wikipedia notability standards, don't have their own articles, or have no verified 3rd party sources backing up the claims of notability. Therefore this section should be cleaned out. Josh a brewer (talk) 20:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NonNotable Alums 

message: Nothing is cited in the student life section, which needs reliable, 3rd party sources (or, otherwise, needs to get cut). Josh a brewer (talk) 18:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Life cites nothing
Talk:Fort Wayne TinCaps

message: The Salem Red Sox are owned by the Boston Red Sox, not by two Atlantans - as wikipedia's article on that team correctly shows.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.81.94.75 (talk) 17:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Lincoln Bank Tower

message: I removed the Lincoln Bank was bought by Tower Bank reference because it is inaccurate and irrelevant to this article. Lincoln Bank was bought by Norwest (which later chaged its name to Well Fargo when Norwest bought Wells Fargo). - Davodd 21:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bayer process

message: The first equation is not balanced. Fix it 212.179.206.80 14:40, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a discrepancy between the diagram and the text. The diagram shows the product as sodium aluminate NaAl(OH)4  but the text says aluminium hydroxide Al(OH)3. I think the equation should be Al2O3 + 2 NaOH +  3 H2O → 2 NaAl(OH)4. The sodium aluminate probably is precipitated as aluminium hydroxide later, but I think a step has been missed out. Biscuittin (talk) 14:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the missing step, see article. Biscuittin (talk) 20:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

text: The missing step is that silicon dioxide also dissolves in the NaOH, and the aluminum must be separated. see http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/327aluminum.html for details -- 174.137.243.141 (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

text: discussion of silica in NaOH is found at http://www.cal-water.com/pdf/Silica_scaling_Remediation.pdf and the reaction is SiO2 + 2 NaOH → Na2SiO3 + H2O. -- 208.76.231.70 (talk) 15:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Patnaik (2002, Handbook of inorganic chemicals / Pradyot, Patnaik. ) writes that the Bayer process "is not suitable for extracting bauxite that has high silica content (>10%)" but the entire description appears to be in disagreement with other sources concerning the content of the "red mud", so we should be careful. -- 208.76.231.70 (talk) 15:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

text: http://ip.com/patfam/en/39540637 describes using starch or other products as a flocculent to remove fine particles -- 208.76.231.70 (talk) 14:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous comment 

message: Hi
I'm a student planning to edit the page to include links to other Articles on Wikipedia for certain terms with articles. I will also add to the history section and add a "Waste" section below the procedure. I will also provide more sources.
Thanks
GrostoTwig (talk) 03:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Editing
Talk:1951 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox

message: There is |a discussion in progress at WT:AOWR regarding the chassis make driven by Bill Mackey. Interested editors are invited to contribute to the centralized discussion. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 03:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Mackey chassis make
Talk:1952 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox
Talk:1950 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox

message: The Classification chart needs explanation of the "(W)" and "(R)" behind some drivers' names.  Casey (talk) 16:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: (W) = past winner; (R) = rookie. I've added a footnote. DH85868993 (talk) 00:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend needed 
Talk:1953 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox
Talk:1954 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox

message: *For later use
**https://www.newspapers.com/image/105547960/
Doctorindy↔Talk 13:48, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Link
Talk:1955 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox
Talk:1956 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox
Talk:1957 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox
Talk:1958 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox

message: Who has an idea of how or what happened to Pat 115.64.139.95 (talk) 08:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pat O Conners Death Mystery
Talk:1959 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 12:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox
Talk:1960 Indianapolis 500

message: At right is the Formula One infobox which was removed from the article in June 2012. It was (presumably) preserved here on the talk page to make it easier to put back, in case it is ever decided to do that. DH85868993 (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Formula One infobox

message: Needs reworded. It states that Jim Hurtubise was the "fastest qualifier in the field"...which is not the case. He had the single fastest qualifying lap, but the fastest qualifier in the field was the pole sitter, Eddie Sachs. ShelbyMarion (talk) 19:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is 100% accurate to state that Jim Hurtubise is the "fastest qualifier in the field." The pole position winner is technically the driver who starts in grid position #1. He is only technically the fastest qualifier on the first day (first "round") of time trials. Due to the nature of time trials at Indy (particularly during that period when there were 4 days of time trials), it was not at all uncommon for the a driver on the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th day of time trials to post a speed faster than that of the pole position winner.  There are several other years in which the pole winner was not the fastest qualifier, recent years include 1996, 1991, 1981, 1976. Doctorindy↔Talk 02:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

text: No problem! Doctorindy↔Talk 16:10, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time Trails section 
Talk:List of Indianapolis 500 winners

message: What does (R) mean after some of the names? Why isn't this explained anywhere? Seven Pandas (talk) 11:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It means "rookie". There's a footnote at the bottom of the "Hulman/George Era – INDYCAR sanctioning (1998–2019)" table. It's debatable whether that's the best place for it. DH85868993 (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: THanks. Definitely not the best place. It should be at the top of the list section. Seven Pandas (talk) 22:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have moved it there. I'm also wondering, should Harroun be identified as a rookie in the 1911 row? It was his first Indianapolis 500... DH85868993 (talk) 00:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I disagree.  Footnotes belong at the bottom of a table.  This is standard practice in academia.  I understand that some who see this article may not be well educated, but still - there are standards.  Footnotes go at the bottom.  Hence the name, FOOT note. 174.171.71.34 (talk) 14:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "R" after names 

message: I think starting position would be a good addition as one of the columns Richtova (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where each winner qualified
Talk:Wrigley's Spearmint

message: sounds like a advert
* same thing on the extra page, edited by the same ip --213.66.39.36 17:54, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

message: The last paragraph in this article is written in unreferenced sentence fragments, and includes the opinion word "unfortunately". I would edit it to be grammatically and factually sound but I do not know if the facts within the paragraphs are actually facts as they have no citation to prove they are facts.
50.229.181.234 (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final paragraph
Talk:Gainbridge Fieldhouse

message: Where are all the references to pro-wrestling and mixed martial arts that have been and will be held in Conseco Fieldhouse? For example, Great American Bash 2006, SummerSlam 2008, and UFC 119.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.50.128.22 (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrestling and MMA 

message: Conseco Fieldhouse has not been officially announced any new name. The source cited was using unverified information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigGarb (talk • contribs) 18:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conseco Fieldhouse 

message: The statement about most North American indoor arenas not being designed primarily for basketball would seem to me to need some qualification.  Perhaps it means "major indoor arenas suitable for professional sports" but that isn't stated.  I don't know if even that is true and it isn't referenced.  There are a lot more arenas overall with basketball floors than there are that can even be frozen, that's for sure.  2600:1004:B164:9DB7:BC03:736A:4B42:8D96 (talk) 01:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basketball arenas 

message: #9 is the arena name change announcement and URL does not work Rossidor (talk) 17:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gainbridge link invalid
Talk:Indiana Fever

message: The list of Fever head coaches is wrong.  I don't believe any of the 3 listed have been associated with the Fever.  It does not mention Nell Fortner or Brian Winters, 2 of the most recent heads.  Eric 20:27, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
:That's my fault. I didn't import them correctly while I was converting the format. The list should be correct now. --Jtalledo (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of head coaches 

message: I applaud everyones initiative in this article. However, this section needs to be re-worded. So it doesn't sound too one-sided. I appreciate if someone cleans it up so it can comply with WP:NPOV policy.   ELO MnLynx Fan77 15:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franchise History 
Talk:Indianapolis Hoosiers

message: Is there any support (or opposition) for taking the Federal League Hoosiers section and merging it with Newark Pepper, leaving behind a "main article" tag? It seems logical to me. Perhaps the new article should be titled Indianapolis Hoosiers/Newark Pepper to mirror the Buffeds/Blues and Chi-Feds/Whales article title structure. -Dewelar (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge FL section with Newark Pepper?
Talk:Market Square Arena

message: Please recognize Troy Dixon and Heavy D and the boys. Troy lost his life due to an accidental fall in this building 1990. 98.147.176.112 (talk) 12:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Indyguy (talk) 15:03, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troy Dixon Accidental Death