lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Felix Pappalardi

message: Also produced Lords of the New Church —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.244.6.79 (talk • contribs) at 09:02, 15 February 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also 

message: he also appeared on Tom Paxton as well as Vince Martin and Fred Neil albums for Elektra Records. From there he moved into record production, initially concentrating on folk and folk-rock acts for artists such as The Youngbloods and Joan Baez. ... where is any of this? (except the youngbloods where is there). Luminifer (talk) 04:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Discography stuff

message: When did Felix and Gail get married?
--Rock'N'More (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Married 

message: " The members of Cream did not have much experience with "classical" instruments so these were generally played by Papplardi on their albums." This is absolutely untrue. Jack Bruce won a scholarship to the Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama to study cello and composition; he can both read and write music, and is an able contrabass and cello player. I don't know about Baker's skills as a reader and I doubt that Clapton can play anything except guitar, but Bruce is an able multi-instrumentalist and had as much classical training as Pappalardi ever had. Lexo (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really exactly sure how much training either had, but I do know that Bruce dropped out of the Academy pretty early. i've heard that Pappalardi had a Master's degree in music, although I can't confirm that. It's a fair bet, though, that Papparlardi had signifificantly more higher-education formal music training than Bruce. TheScotch (talk) 03:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies 

message: Wouldn't moving to Mexico be a parole violation? If so, then "fled" would be correct. Prescottbush (talk) 03:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fled" vs. "moved" for Gail Collins 

message: It is ubiquitous online that Pappalardi worked with Joan Baez.  But in what specific capacity?  On what specific music did they collaborate, and what was Pappalardi's role in it? 2603:7000:3400:29E1:C42B:910:2A74:3E36 (talk) 05:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work With Joan Baez?
Talk:Balatonfüred

message: I have put this item up there as my first attempt to contribute to the Project. Someone has been kind enough to edit it slightly. I did not realize, and I still do not whether it is important to sign such an act or not. 
Apogr 09:14, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: All the photos right now are of water. How about some images of the town intself??? Karol 02:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 
Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 1994

message: Was this the point where RTE started freaking out about Ireland constantly winning? Timrollpickering 23:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, fixed it. The next time, please change the pic instead of just deleting it. Thanks :-) Peter S. 16:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hosting costs? 

message: You say that this year cost half the amount of the previous year. Are you sure this is accurate? I seem to remember this one being the really expensive one that Ireland did. Apparently it took half the entire year's programming budget. I won't change anything because I'm not certain and possibly I've got the wrong year.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 21:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost? 

message: Is a reason why Italy may have skipped this event known? ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 07:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italy question
Talk:1920 in Germany

message: Would you please introduce some headlines in order to make the text readable ?
Done. I shall also continue to cut this for length, despite User:Wik's edit comment (49K is clearly excessive). I shall also ask him here to provide the source for this text, if public domain.
Charles Matthews 08:25, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: What happened in Germany in 1920 102.67.178.213 (talk) 21:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Biafra

message: The Council of Chiefs page should not be linked on this article. The current Council of Chiefs is a disambiguation page. If an article is made specifically for the Biafra Council of Chiefs, then it should be linked here, but a disambiguation article should not be linked on this article as its been done. RoundSquare (talk) 17:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Council of Chiefs link 

message: Interested editors who wish to join other editors like myself to create an article on Biafra may start now to gather Reliable Sources as Biafra's independence is about to be restored since after the 1967 to 1970. According to sources from Finland and beyond, Ekpa like Ojukwu plans to declare a sovereign Biafran State in December 2024. Whether Ekpa's declaration of independence will be recognized by Countries is a matter of time. Let's keep fingers crossed. I found these sources: 1. 2. 3. 4.  Note I that I am not suggesting that this current article on Biafra will be deleted but that it will be improved to reflect the declaration or alternatively create another article naming it "Biafra" while this current one's Namespace will be changed to Biafra (1967-1970) or Biafra (1967-2024). A future consensus will determine on this probably. We wait till then as more References will be coming. Fugabus (talk) 13:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A New Article page alert on Biafra maybe created
Talk:Gaffer

message: How can this definition ever be expanded to an encyclopedia entry? Isn't there a description of all the jobs on a movie set? Wetman 11:52, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: How

message: Gaffer may have its roots in 16th Century English, but it is still a commonly used word in Britain for "boss". It is particularly often used by football (soccer) players when referring to the team's manager/coach. Should this article be renamed as something like Gaffer (film crew) and Gaffer be a disambiguation page, with a new page for the common British meaning? This is not to say that the usage of Gaffer in this article is incorrect in Britain. Dancarney 00:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A valid point that should be mentioned at the outset, and not hidden away under "Derivation". I've slightly reorganised this article so that a disambiguation and second article probably aren't needed. ..dave souza, talk 22:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These are two different meanings and should be in separate articles. I agree with Dancarney's suggestion that they should be split and a disambiguation page created. Chardir 15:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: If someone wants to do that I've no great objection, though both articles should have a reference to each other in the text as well as referring to other meanings at the disambiguation page, since they're both bosses! ..dave souza, talk 21:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: British English

message: Proposal: That this page remains but the Gaffer as an old man or foreman section is moved to a new article Gaffer (foreman) and a Gaffer (disambiguation) page is created with links to these two and Gaffer Tape. Comments please. Chardir 16:32, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with this is that it gives primacy to a relatively recent term for a boss which is common in the motion picture industry, relegating a longstanding term which remains common in British English usage, thus reflecting a bias towards the US which can occur in the internet. My preference is to keep the two together, but if need be Gaffer could become a disambiguation page for Gaffer (boss) and Gaffer (motion picture). ...dave souza, talk 17:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the suggestion by Dave souza is probably better than yours Chardir. That way it doesn't give primacy to any of the usages. If I don't hear any complaints about this in the next day or so, I will go ahead and do this.-Localzuk(talk) 14:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, I'm happy with that. Chardir 14:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Endemic

message: I just did a couple hundred more disambiguation edits of endemic.  I would recommend renaming this page to "endemic (disambiguation)", redirecting "endemic" to endemism, and putting the "endemic redirects here" template on endemism as well as the "for other uses see endemic (dab)".  I would say 92% of links to endemic are for endemism, with 7% of the remaining for diseases and 1% for non-technical usage which shouldn't be linked anyway since that is just linking to a plain English word (WP:CONTEXT.  Obviously the dab linking for endemic is a recurring problem, and doing the redirect to endemism would make it go away for the most part. AdamMorton 06:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose rename, redirect 

message: The article is incorrect; people do not use "endemic" mistakenly substituting it for "epidemic"; when one says "corruption is endemic" somewhere, the implication is that it is deeply rooted, hard to extirpate -- that corruption is so rife it constitutes part of the fabric of society.  That seems to me much closer to the biological meaning than the article implies. 74.65.208.91 (talk) 05:57, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not used in place of epidemic
Talk:Outline of linguistics

message: This page currently is linked from a lot of articles. Is it right to have a link from an article to the Wikipedia namespace ? Jay 14:28, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, IMO structural linguistics shouldn't exist, since structuralism is a linguistic movement. Just changed the link. --Valmi ✒ 03:38, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsorted text from 2004 and 2005

message: I'm writing Language proficiency. Obviously, please give it a look-see; help develop it, and then I'll probably try to include it here. samwaltz 02:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proficiency

message: I have proposed List of English prefixes for transwiki to wiktionary, and I thought you might be interested.  Please suggest otherplaces I might post this. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prefixes

message: Anyone with the expertise to expand the stub? Systemic linguistics Tony 09:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systemic linguistics 

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Pomology

message: Is a walnut tree considered a fruit tree as in a peach or a plum tree?  (RJF1@[site delete to protect user privacy].com)
:In a very technical sense, yes, but generally, by most people, no. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 08:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuts 

message: :Category:Pomologists now exists; needs populating. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 08:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: This page is now "wikified" with internal links. Kville105125 (talk) 13:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: Have a look at these links
https://www.amazon.com/Textbook-Pomology-Edgar-Crombie/dp/1682861368/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1505865855&sr=1-2&keywords=Pomology  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.38.105.161 (talk) 00:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of this topic needs to be precisely written.
Talk:Snail mail

message: What the hell is up with that paragraph about bandits? No source, I don't feel particulary bold, so if some one could fact check and or clean up that oddity~ 184.148.175.237 (talk) 20:22, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: List at Vfd to see if you get any support. Jay 10:37, 7 May 2004 (UTC)

text: But as of right now, snail mail excluding Wikipedia still lists USPS.com as #1. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 01:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page contains a little bit of Mail
Maybe they should be merged or something?
I mean, most of it isn't really that different.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arienh4 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mail]]
Talk:Israel's Border Wars, 1949–1956

message: Is it "1949-1956" or "1948-1956"? Both appear in the article, and I don't want to change it in the wrong direction. Vicki Rosenzweig 14:50, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Titles of Nobility Amendment

message: Please see paragraph 8 - this paragraph makes reference to the conspiracy that the USA became a corporation known as ‘UNITED STATES INC’ in 1871 and that president Lincoln was, in effect, an illegitimately elected president of the same. 2A00:23C7:3188:CE01:9128:14BB:83AB:7EE (talk) 17:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please point out the text, link, etc. to be able to tell what you are referring to. 104.175.78.152 (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page contains inaccurate information
Talk:Złotów

message: The History section has included this wording:  From 1709 to 1711, a plague known as the Black Death affected the area. According to incomplete church records, approximately 1,650 people died as a result of the epidemic.  This needed work. The link to the Black Death isn't too helpful b/c that article mostly covers the plagues of the 1300s. The link to "plague" generally isn't as helpful as another article I found, on plague related to the Great Northern War. I have redone the first sentence. I don't pretend to know anything specific to Złotów, or areas nearby, in this regard, and if someone with more specific information wishes to further edit this, please do. Oaklandguy (talk) 05:33, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed a sentences re the plague years 1709-1711; my explanation; others may have more specifics 

message: He bought his first guitar in Zlotow. Should add to article. 82.21.55.166 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 22:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Janick Gers]] of [[Iron Maiden]]
Talk:Life on Earth (TV series)

message: I don't think that was David Attenboroguh's voice in the After Eight advert. I think it was someone doing an impression of him. Mintguy (T) 18:38, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You may be right, Mintguy.  It is possible that my recollection was tainted by the interview in which Attenborough confessed his bemusement at the moment's celebrity. -- Alan Peakall 18:25, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Attenborough doesn't mention doing an advert in his memoirs, and Google searches on various permutations of 'Attenborough, advertisement, mints' turn up nothing relevant except Wikipedia mirrors. Also, I can't find anything confirming that Attenborough was bemused by the scene's popularity; on the contrary, in Life on Air he calls it 'one of the most exciting encounters of my life' and expresses regret that more of it wasn't recorded (apparently the cameraman was running low on film). I've removed the entire passage; it should, of course, be reinstated if anyone finds sources to back up its claims. Perodicticus 19:41, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have started to expand the "Episodes" section to provide original summaries, and episodes 1 through 9 are now done. In order to ensure equal coverage and consistency of presentation, I am striving to keep them all to a fixed number of lines — similar to my efforts on the Planet Earth article. I hope to add the others gradually over the next few days. Chris 42 15:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode summaries 

message: How the fuck do you "film in slow motion"? What the hell does that even mean? Did they ask the bat the flap its wings really slow or what, hello, ability to think??? --80.220.94.49 (talk) 11:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filming techniques
Talk:Keratitis

message: ...the article mentions both but they are actually quite different. AED 07:10, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sort of, though it would depend upon what kind of Keratitis it was. This site seems to have an reasonable overview of transmission of the viral form. Forms like Photokeratitis would not be contagious. IANAD, though, so don't use what you read here as a diagnosis, check with your doctor, etc.--Arcadian 03:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Infection vs. Inflammation

message: I think it is important for wikipedia users to know that severe occular alergy can cause keratitis and I added a sentence providin this information. I think it is useful and genuine. I'd be glad if this minor improvment is not removed. thank you.SunnieBG 23:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Small addition

message: — Assignment last updated by MickPick2 (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Journal Club
Talk:Cayman Islands dollar

message: Alright, how many Caymanians do we have around here?
----
I hope you don't mind me jumping in to help with the formatting - I spotted an anonymous change on Special:Recentchanges and thought you might need a hand. I don't know anything about the topic itself, so I should have left a note here rather than simply removing information. I apologise, and hope you agree with the clarification I have now added - IMSoP 20:29, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Whole Man

message: Everything in this article appears in the first section. Is that a spoiler?
----
I inserted the spoiler warning to tell people about the plot summary.  As spoilers go, it's not that blatant, but I thought that its current positioning is appropriate, i.e. before the plot summary but after the commentary. Meelar 20:23, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The National Rose Garden

message: The title for this page should probably indicate to which nationality this garden is associated. Bevo 20:26, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus, if it's "the world's biggest", it should be noted the criteria. Biggest in area, in number of flowers, in species of flowers, in visit ...? A photo would be handy too. --Romanm 19:08, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Dabbling duck

message: This pic link is broken - placed here until it can be repaired. - MPF 20:35, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, if the Marbled Duck has been reclassified, the article should be updated as well. --Kjoonlee 17:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Dysmorodrepanis 21:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification of [[Marbled Duck]]
Talk:Lidzbark Warmiński

message: www.google.com : Heilsberg = 9.520 result, Lidzbark Warminski :5.680
----------------------
Google is not an encyclopedia!
------------------------------------
The following documents dealing with Heilsberg in 1615 and a map from 1755 were removed by wikipedia User:ProudPomerania:
* Ermland, Heilsberg, Culm, Riesenburg, Samland bishoprics on 1615 list of Imperial Offices (Ordines Imperii)
*
Heilsberg Epicopate Warmia in Prussia map of 1755
------------
Please sign your edits.
By the way, can you enlighten me what's so vital for Lidzbark in a list of European bishops from 1615? The page has the info about the Bishopric of Warmia. You have not invented anything new.
Is the stupid Google comparison also your idea? Do you know that there are at least two other Heilsbergs? It's like comparing "Helga Hecht" (85) to "Sandra Schmidt" (43,700). What does it prove? ProudPomeranian 21:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsorted text
Talk:Politics of the Cayman Islands

message: This is better than many articles of the same name but needs restructuring into "Government of the Cayman Islands." Voters elect "Elections of Cayman Islands" quite clear on that. Then there is the government structure under the constitution. What elected officials do with their authority constitutes "Politics." Student7 (talk) 13:58, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs revision
Talk:European Union member states

message: When I came back from the Canaries in 1996 they were specificly mentioned as not qualifying for EU customes exemption. I took this to mean tht athey were not in the Customs Union. DJ Clayworth 21:42, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Morocco's application was declined with the official reason that it is not on the "european continent", but yes this should be mentioned somewhere Alinor 21:44, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What about Iceland? had it attempted to join the EU?
:Not to my knowledge. Wombat 11:06, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iceland 

message: This is from an article I wrote: "Belarus has not stated publicly that they seek out EU membership, but former Lithuanian Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius state in 2003 that Belarus despretly needs membership in order to "get out of the swamp."  Kubilius also said that he hoped that with Lithuania being members of the EU and NATO could help suppply aid to Belarus." Zach (Sound Off) 03:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belarus 

message: 1.) We should list the "possible candidate states" from the Western Balkans as such.
::included them as part of the Stabilisation and Association process that includes provisions for full EU membership. Alinor 08:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree and acted. Too many countries have AAs with the EU. Only Morocco is left, becouse it has submitted official application.Alinor 08:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:Operation Market Garden

message: This description, in the 'German preparation' paragraph, is highly inappropriate. For one thing, Nazi SS officers should not be accorded normal military ranks. For another, following his promotion in August 1944, Bittrich was an SS-Obergruppenfuhrer und General der Waffen-SS, equivalent to full general despite his only holding a corps and not an army command. The SS equivalent of lieutenant-general would be one step down, SS-Gruppenfuhrer und Generalleutnant der Waffen-SS. Khamba Tendal (talk) 19:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Lieutenant General Wilhelm Bittrich'
Talk:Law of Demeter

message: It is not actually a link to any evidience of a disadvantage in terms of preformance, please link to something correct!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.254.100 (talk) 11:30, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 2 

message: The cited reference for the 5 points listed in this section slightly contradicts some of the 5 points.  The reference only details 4 points.  Point one and point five are not listed in the reference.  Point is is the "method" itself, not the object,  and point four and one in the article are really the same.  The cited reference *never* details global variables.
Ritchiep (talk) 19:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In object-oriented programming 

message: What does this law have to do with Demeter? -- Smerdis of Tlön 18:08, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name 

message: No further work has been conducted using the Law since 1996. However, it is still taught in less up-to-date computer science curriculums.
What is the intended meaning of these two sentences? Shinobu 18:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shinobu, we have to talk. 134.106.199.22 15:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?