Talk:Shizuoka (city)

message: regarding the naming of city articles at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles). --Polaron | Talk 08:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please join the discussion

message: In point of fact, I'm not particularly opposed to the idea of having Sunpu remain a separate article, but I thought I could bring some attention to the issue by adding these merge tags.
#If we don't merge, or, I suppose even if we do, the section on Sunpu, and the overall section on Shizuoka's history need expansion badly.
#Heian-kyō, Heijo-kyō, Naniwa, do not have separate articles. But then, Edo does, although it's really short.
#If we don't merge, we need to figure out what to do with old names of existing cities, in terms of categories. Does it fit under "Category:Cities of Japan"? It doesn't really fit under "Dissolved municipalities" or any of those, as it's only been renamed and changed and grown, not really dissolved.
Thank you. LordAmeth 19:46, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunpu 

message: The infobox and body text give slightly different figures for the area of Shizuoka, 1388 and 1373 square kilometres respectively. Can anyone resolve this? papageno (talk) 10:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've resolved it. The area changed as a result of the merger with Kanbara, Shizuoka. The area was updated in one place but not the other. I've gotten updated population figures from a Shizuoka web page and recalculated the population density, putting the numbers both in the box and in the body text. Fg2 (talk) 10:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting area figures

message: According to the MOS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOS:JAPAN#Place_names), designated cities such as Shizuoka should be written in the form [[{city-name}]] only and not [[{city-name}, {prefecture-name}]]. Should the title of this article be changed from Shizuoka, Shizuoka to just Shizuoka?
76.209.140.172 (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title 

message: It's a very minor thing that probably doesn't make a difference, but the picture of the "Reconstructed building at the Toro archeological site" is old---the entire site has been knocked down, terraformed and rebuilt.  If I wasn't such a terrible photographer, I'd put up a new photo myself.  Acidtoyman (talk) 00:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture from Toroiseki 

message: * Support as nominator. Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 23:09, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I have changed "", the city's English website, in the infobox to "", the city's official Japanese page because the English link was no longer working. I've could've linked directly to "", but the link was kind of long and the address contains the word "Chinese" which might confuse some readers.The Japanese page does clearly say at the top "English･" ("English and other languages") so this should not be too hard to find. My guess is that Shizuoka probably did have specific subpages for English, Chinese and Portuguese, etc. at one time, but decided to combine them all into a single page. This is not very surprising, since websites in non-Japanese can sometimes be seen as a non-essential service at budget time and it's less of a hassle, especially for smaller cities, to simply use translation software or just combine multiple pages into one which list only the basics because they don't have to be maintained at all or not as often.  So, I figure the Japanese link is the most stable and, therefore, the one that should be used. - Marchjuly (talk) 01:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website 

message: Another "Foo, Foo" move discussion is taking place at Talk:Nara, Nara#Requested move 23 December 2014. Dekimasuよ! 03:56, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another "Foo, Foo" move discussion for a Japanese city 

message: Hi. their is some cite errors in the page. בקש (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in page 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fukushima (city) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 00:16, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress