lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kevin Daley

message: From the username, this user appears to be the subject of the article, and they made substantial edits to it in 2013. I have tried to remove the most blatant promotion, but I have also added the Conflict of Interest tag, which requires me to post here. Briefly, the references to awards etc with no sources still appear non-neutral. There seems to be no point warning the user as they have been inactive for 5 years. Thanks, GreyGreenWhy (talk) 09:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Ibspecialk21]]
Talk:Uvs (disambiguation)

message: Perhaps this article will help disentangling the various names and clusters etc.  Mattisse 21:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion has been opened in a central location to reach consensus about the organization of the various articles relating to "Uvs Nuur". Please join this discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Central Asia.
- Hux (talk) 02:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly disagreed. Discussions of specific topics must be carried out in talk pages of the corresponding articles. And the discussion is already in progress. before you jumped in with wikilawyering. Project pages are for general organization. Instead of herding people around, why don't you write an article or two instead? `'Míkka>t 04:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not "herding people around". I'm trying to help. If you don't agree with the nature of that attempt then that's your prerogative, but I fail to see how your belligerence is justified. Is this the way you treat everyone who makes an effort to improve things? - Hux (talk) 11:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uvs Nuur central discussion
Template talk:Tulane University

message: Someone has changed the photo.  Thank you for contributing.  There are 2 issues though: (1) whoever put the photo up neglected to list it as self-generated, so it might get deleted soon; (2) the photo is HUGE!  Is the size 500 good?  129.81.195.24 (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  * I just went ahead and reduced the image size.  If someone has a strong preference for changing it, just go ahead or discuss it here first. 129.81.195.24 (talk) 19:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I put the old image back b/c, as predicted, the Gibson Hall image got deleted b/c the user did not specify that he/she took the picture.New.Orleans.JD-MBA (talk) 01:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New photo

message: I just removed a PROD tag from Sports_Lawyers_Journal.  I suggest that those who are interested in this topic may want to watchlist that article and also improve it (it has cleanup tags that are legitimate -- and have been there for years).  Often, PROD tags are a first step to WP:AFD.  Montanabw(talk) 19:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note
Talk:Parineeta

message: The redirect Parineeta(film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Parineeta(film)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Wikipedia talk:Delegable proxy

message: I was going to say, that would be a good lesson to apply here, but then I remembered, WP:DEMOCRACY. (D'oh!) Obuibo Mbstpo (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Henry M. Robert]] quote

message: Abd said in the deletion debate that this couldn't be suppressed, and that only apathy could kill it.  Looks like he was right; apathy did kill it!  And a good job too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.193.245.15 (talk) 14:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Apathy
Talk:Coagh

message: Isn't it actually pronounced /kox/? I was sure I'd heard it pronounced like that.
Anyway, I've removed the stress mark from the IPA transcription. I hardly see that such a thing is needed for a one-syllable name.Kelisi (talk) 05:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Martyrs Monument in Midway

message: According to Sue Mundy, Sue is a fictional character .... someone is wrong Victuallers (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything I have seen on various historical markers and a few written sources say that Sue Mundy was real.  The Sue Mundy article has no sources.  I'll see what I can find to improve the Sue Mundy article, to establish whether or not there was such an individual.--Bedford 15:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sue Mundy

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Angels Landing

message: Something is messed up with the main image on this page. It looks like there is a collision between a en.wikipedia image and a wiki commons image. Not sure how to resolve it so I'm just leaving a note. Just a wiki gnome not a wiki superhero.Bobarino (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: How's it look now? --some jerk on the Internet  (talk)  22:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi CutOffTies,
Just last week I visited Zion national park and hiked Angel's Landing for the first time. I have hiked all over the world and this is hands down the most terrifying hike I have ever done and I'm not alone. When you hike this trail, the FOCUS is DEATH. When you board the Zion shuttle, the operator tells you multiple times that Angel's Landing is highly dangerous and that deaths have occurred. As you do the hike, you are warned with signs on numerous occasions along the trail that people have died including a sign that reads "6 people have died here since 2005". And if you choose to eavesdrop or talk to people along the hike, you'll quickly find that everyone who does this trail is focused on the deaths that have occurred here.
This is not merely my anecdotal rambling either. See for yourself. Beginning typing "Angel's Landing" into Google. As you'll quickly notice, the 2nd and 5th search autofills are "angel's landing deaths" and "angel's landing zion deaths".
Your comparison of Angel's Landing to Half Dome is a good one and one that I used myself in assessing this trail. Also, as you'll see again, if you Google "Angel's Landing vs", the autofill feature will fill in "angel's landing vs half dome". Although these trails are comparable, going to the Half Dome wikipedia page, you'll see that there have been only 5 fatalities since 1919, whereas at Angel's Landing there have been more.
Or, are you thinking it would be a good idea to remove the death (or death references) section on the Half Dome page too?
Sincerely,
Lenschulwitz (talk) 12:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angel's Landing Deaths 
Talk:Angel Kreiman Brill

message: estimado rabino A.kreiman si uds pudiera contactarse con migo se lo agradeceria me llamo Mariel y pertenesco al hogar de ninos de la benei hibrit en santiago y vivo actualmente en israel le tengo un recado de un familiar suyo que vive aca en israel se trata de Maximo kreiman mi telefono es 972-52-8227511 el tiene muchas ganas de saber de uds ho lo puede hacer por intermedio del correo electronico toda raba shalom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.125.84.134 (talk) 22:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estimado rabino angel Kreiman 

message: The article is largely unsourced. In 2016, a Spanish article :es:Ángel Kreiman Brill was created, and by late 2016  (permalink) had seven references, and didn't look anything like the shorter English article of the time (permalink) that was created years earlier. Mathglot (talk) 01:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced
Talk:Society for the Promotion of Japanese Literature

message: As far as I know, however, the article in its original state   is correct.  I should disclose, however, that I read Japanese poorly, and so may have mistaken the kanji (I don't think I did) or the romaji (I may have).  --Iamunknown 22:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclosure
Talk:Messerschmitt M 17

message: According to Smith (in refs) the S 16 was not a glider, nor the S 15 though the S 14 was.TSRL (talk) 22:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: S16

message: We claim the M 17 won a lot.  Is there any citable detail?  There are conflicting numbers ie on number built and on max weight within our text.TSRL (talk) 23:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Competitions and numbers
Template talk:Science portalbar

message: I noticed the Portal:Systems science has been removed from the list and the Portal:Mathematics has been added. It think adding mathematics is a good thing. I however regret it that you removed the systems science portal. I think Systems science fits into the list of "History of Science", "Philosophy of science" and "Scientific method" as a player. Personally I think the systems sciences are among the most interessing innovations in science in the second half of the 20th century, and I would appreciate if the portal would be placed back. Thanks you. -- Mdd (talk) 22:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an other argument why I think the Portal:Systems science should be mentioned. The portal itselve is an introduction towards the 500 articles related to systems science, and governed by the WikiProject Systems and towards more then 2000 articles about systems, see List of systems, which brings you into all kinds of fields of sciences. -- Mdd (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding systems science portal to the portalbar has had some serious effects on the articles trafelrate, see here. -- Mdd (talk) 02:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  actually it was suggested to remove system sciences portal from the bar though i was in favor of it. thanks Mdd for supporting the idea. cheers, Sushant gupta (talk) 07:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Thank you for adding that portal there in the first place. If somebody wants to discuss these choices, this would be the place to do so. -- Mdd (talk) 10:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal:Systems science
Talk:Wright Park (Tacoma, Washington)

message: It seems obvious to me that this article should be merged with W. W. Seymour Botanical Conservatory. It's in the park, the articles are both very short, and they are listed together on the National Register of Historic Places. Murderbike (talk) 18:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wright Park Arboretum →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME and Metro Parks Tacoma and other sources. If you search "Wright Park" + "Tacoma" at Google, you see more sources using simply "Wright Park". Therefore, I propose we disambiguate by location instead of adding "arboretum" which is just part of the larger park. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Support 'Arboretum' is not part of the name. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 May 2023
Talk:Parchim-class corvette

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: At least some of the Russian ships have been visibly upgraded to 76mm guns and AK-630 47.28.103.223 (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gun change
Talk:Log-logistic distribution

message: I've just noticed that Talk:Shape parameter says it's a generalization of the log-logistic. I've never heard of it though. Anyone who knows any more or feels qualified to relate the two please do. --Qwfp (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done it myself now. Qwfp (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Burr distribution

message: It must be 1-[The formula in the article]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.205.241.254 (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula for cdf is wrong 

message: you are misinterpreting it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen Robertson (talk • contribs) 13:51, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  no, it is correct 

message: The Applications section cross-refers to AFT (accelerated failure time) models, and says that you can allow beta (shape) to vary but fix alpha (scale).  But the AFT article referred to talks about varying a scale parameter.  Does this (log-logistic) article have it the wrong way round?
Stephen Robertson (talk) 13:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  For AFT, vary shape or scale? 

message: I see the similar problem as Stephen Robertson. The fifth property says: "If X has a log-logistic distribution with scale parameter α and shape parameter β then Y = log(X) has a logistic distribution with location parameter log ⁡ ( α ) and scale parameter 1 / β ." It should be: "If X has a log-logistic distribution with location parameter α and shape parameter β then Y = log(X) has a logistic distribution with location parameter log ⁡ ( α ) and scale parameter 1 / β ." Please fix it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.183.223.48 (talk) 20:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in article 

message: The article repeatedly states that the log-logistic is used to model one application or the other. What is missing is whether the log-logistic is purely heuristic, or if it has a mathematical derivation underpinning its use. I get the impression that it is purely heuristic and replaces more difficult-to-manipulate distributions on account of having a closed-form CDF. 137.79.239.217 (talk) 20:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Context
File talk:Gameboyline2.png

message: This image should remove the Wikipedia logo, Wikipedia does not own the Nintendo Game Boys. The logo should be removed.
While this is true...they probably just wanted to show it for fun...we all know that Wiki doesn't own Nintendo ^__^
 erica
Erica higgins
*And besides, by that logic we should also get rid of all the Nintendo pictures, and all the other pictures with... bad analogy, but still, a logo does not denote ownership. 75.118.140.145 (talk) 14:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

message: If this picture was meant to be as complete as to include the GBA SP mk1 and 2, why wouldn't it include the Power LED-less Game Boy Pocket which is quite common.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miniclash (talk • contribs) 08:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too bad it's not complete.
Talk:Microsoft Virtual Earth

message: The link to 'www.virtualearth.com' does not work. It re-directs you to another site called http://intl.local.live.com/
210.246.51.230 (talk) 22:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because that is Virtual Earth. Just click on "3D" in the map the site provides. Just be advised that you have to download a file to view VE. Leo-Roy!review/gb 20:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yves (given name)

message: Mention if related to Eve#Etymology. Jidanni (talk) 02:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eve 

message: Aren't they related to Yves?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.162.209 (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ewan, Ewen - born of the yew (tree)
Talk:List of individual bears

message: Can someone who knows better clear up a point under sectn, The Great Bear of Burtonport – which part is tongue-in-cheek/real etc because it's not referenced and needs to be encyclopedic in tone. Don't know enough about it to sort out the irony. Thanks,  Julia Rossi (talk) 07:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Great?

message: Should this "list" be sorted alphabetically or chronologically? It really should be one or the other, I think. Right now there doesn't seem to be any particular order to it. - dcljr (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it was originally intended to be alphabetical, rather than chronological.  I'll edit it accordingly. María (habla conmigo) 12:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order? 
Talk:Dollodon

message: The image used here is identical to that of Mantellisaurus?--MWAK (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I drew the image that is currently in the artical and it used to be in the Mantellisaurus artical, but I made a mistake.  It is based on Gregory Pauls skeletal which was in his 2000 Scientific American book of Dinosuars labled as Iguanodon atherfieldensis. In 2006 he created Mantellisaurus from Iguanodon atherfieldensis so I asumed that that skeletal would therefore be Mantellisaurus. However acording to his new paper that the specimen the drawing is based on is actually this new genus Dollodn. I have drawn the proper Mantellisaurus, here  Steveoc 86 (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to clarify, Both of these skeletals at one time were clasified as Iguanodon atherfieldensis. But have been split up, C is mantellisaurus and D is Dollodon. []. Steveoc 86 (talk) 16:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the clarification. I'll immediately insert the, quite beautiful, other picture!--MWAK (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, and thanks! Steveoc 86 (talk) 19:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

message: The reference about the status of Dollodon has been published (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667111000346)68.4.61.168 (talk) 21:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: Seems to be the consensus? FunkMonk (talk) 10:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Mantellisaurus]]?
Template talk:Sport in the ACT

message: As per the original 
Bongomanrae (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Instructions

message: Should they be on the template?  The Bulldogs were playing a game a season up here and they weren't listed as a team.  The city didn't appear on the guernsey.  The team isn't based in the ACT. --LauraHale (talk) 02:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, GWS certainly isn't "based" in the ACT. I've removed it. IgnorantArmies 15:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Although, now that I think about it, the ACT-based AFL Canberra teams should also be added. IgnorantArmies 15:51, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  GWS Giants
Talk:Zakros

message: Is there really a labyrinth at Kato Zakros?  I visited there in September 2011, and the only labyrinthine things I noticed were a slightly labyrinthine structure that led to a basin, and the usual lustral basins.  Platon doesn't mention a labyrinth in his book Zakros: The Discovery of a Lost Palace of Ancient Crete either. k. da-ma-te (talk) 08:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there is no such thing as a Bronze Age 'labyrinth'. Rodney Castleden - who is not accepted amongst Aegeanists as a serious scholar, nor has he published anything about Minoan architecture or society in peer-reviewed works - is the author whose book both sources that were cited referred to. He calls what is generally known as 'palaces' (or to Jan Driessen and Ilse Schoep as 'court-centred buildings') labyrinths. He based this on the idea that the labyrinthine construction of the palaces inspired the later myths, which is an idea that has been floating around for a while. Perhaps he was referring also to the polythyron system, whose precise use is still not yet fully known - however, there is no serious scholar talking about Bronze Age or Minoan culture that refers to any of these architectural features as 'labyrinths' therefore this does not belong in the Wiki article. I've deleted it. You're much better off following Platon as he is the general authority on Zakros and an actual scholar!131.111.233.196 (talk) 09:59, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Labyrinth

message: I rebooted it. One thing is left to do ie read the Platon book on the palace and say something more, and more coherent about the palace(s) or whatever they were. One can borrow it from archive dot org.
*Nikolaos Platon, "Zakros: The Discovery of a Lost Palace of Ancient Crete", Scribner, 1971 
A few more words about the Linear A finds would also not be amiss.Ploversegg (talk) 14:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article
Talk:Stone Cottage

message: This is the first entry that comes up in a search for “stone cottage”, this muddying search results when someone is seeking information on cottages made of stone. It is not a prominent enough structure to warrant a Wikipedia entry of its own. Would appear to be nothing more than self promotion by the architect. 73.132.136.208 (talk) 11:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this page exist?
File talk:MESSENGER EN0108828359M.png

message: here's a link to the caption provided on the sources website for this image:
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/image.php?page=5&search_type=and&image_id=121&keyword=3&search_cat=
For whatever reason, NASA has since inverted the image.  Zebulin (talk) 00:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul (Lewiston, Maine)

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
--Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:10, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review: Fail  
Talk:Veerasamy

message: Please stop removing contents. T. Raj is also known as Karadi / King Kong amongst his fans and there's no need to remove it. Just like how Vijay is known as Illayathalapahty, Ajith known as Ultimate star or thala, Vadivelu known as Vagaipuyal, Vijayakaanth known as Captain, Simbhu (Karadi Kong's son) known as little superstar and most importantly Rajnikanth known as superstar. It's the norm in Tamil cinema. So stop removing stuff. Please learn to have some fun :-). Prove your points. If you cannot, then supressing, depressing and oppressing the view of a Tamilian. Thank you. Bhostjuck (talk) 15:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a place to have fun ! pls have fun in Orkut, please stop this !  —Preceding unsigned comment added by R.srinivaas (talk • contribs) 07:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Was there a point in that message?--Ssteiner209 (talk) 14:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  so you got the point , this article will be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by R.srinivaas (talk • contribs) 16:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Is this article a joke?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.86.21.66 (talk) 03:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joke? 

message: This article's infobox contains several parameters which are not supported by Template:Infobox film. Nick Number (talk) 22:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox parameters
Talk:FaceBreaker

message: This article smells like hype.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.105.198.19 (talk) 13:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

message: facebreaker also known as bakebreaker  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.83.185 (talk) 18:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:                                                                 facebreaker 