Talk:Differentiated instruction

message: I feel your anguish. This page mainly demonstrates that the label Differentiated Instruction holds no content. For the most part, the page consists of aphorisms applicable to all instruction. Despite my attempt to fix the grammar in the last section, I feel that it should be radically rewritten. To the author: remember that we are trying to explain what makes differentiated instruction distinct from other instruction, we are trying to note who cares, and we would like to understand any controversy over the matter. If DI is just a rehash of other techniques of instruction under a new label, we should indicate that there is no sign of real differentiation. On the other hand, if there are users of differentiation who have found that they are on to something, we should probably mention who they are.
Dkephart (talk) 13:36, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page has a lot of problems:
1) no citations whatsoever, not even textually, of the theorists who have contributed to devising this model; in this respect, the article comes pretty close to plagiarism
2) no mention of criticism of this model
3) citations on this page are inconsistent - there are many in text citations of APA style along with the usual superscript links to the references which are typical of Wikipedia pages  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.76.197.211 (talk) 03:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Underlying Faults

message: As mentioned above, this page is seriously flawed. I personally find importance and value in differentiated instruction, and therefore I am currently attempting to rectify the egregious state of this article. Additionally, as what I would guess to be the only current major (or minor) editor of this page, I would like to set out some goals here for me to try and obtain, as this will be my first major endeavor at creating a well-developed Wikipedia article, and if someone should happen to stumble upon this discussion, I hope they will help me in trying to accomplish at least those which seem most valuable from the list below, but otherwise, they are just for me to look back on and measure my progress with:
*Appropriate internal links
*Articulate, coherent, and organized explanations regarding the utilization of this philosophy
*Numerous, different, well-grounded citations/sources from experts in the field
*Constant improvement towards this becoming a featured article
*A proficient understanding of how to correctly write and edit Wikipedia articles
*Develop a historical section to explore and explain the origins of differentiated instruction
*Find and include a section identifying and explaining the most prominent criticisms of differentiated instruction
*A better personal understanding of differentiated instruction
*The approval of the article by any of the writers of the works cited within it as an adequate description of the philosophy
*A satisfactory hierarchical table of contents
--JGonzo (talk) 23:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial Goals

message: — Assignment last updated by jmenglund (talk) 15:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Teaching and Learning with the Internet