Talk:Wudu

message: I prefer wudu rather than wodoo. The terms I used is from arabic and usually refer as wuduk. Wodoo sound more like vodoo. If need to merge, should be into wudu.Yosri 17:17, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've rewritten a lot of the article to incorporate more detailed information such as, rthe classification of the acts of wudu, the significance of the wudu (still stubbed) and the wudu according to the four Maddhab (schools of islamic jurisprudence). I plan to include more information on the stubby sections. MP   (talk) 11:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major rewrite

message: ===Touch opposite gender by their clothing, not skin===
If I touch a female who isn't my mother, sister etc. by their clothing and not on their skin, do I still have to retake my wudu? --Fantastic4boy 09:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not exactly, once you're clean by "Wudu" getting your hands dirty in a reasonable measure is not a problem,
you can just wash your hands and you're still clean. The consept is sort of inner purity, what spoils the ablution
comes from within you: urine, sperm, blood, cursing, bad thoughts etc. You have no way of knowing who is clean and who is not.
Islam is simple to the one who keep faith. Only in Allah. Ujjie104 (talk) 17:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wudu #Invalidation]] 

message: If I touch a female who isn't my mother, sister etc. by their clothing and not on their skin, do I still have to retake my wudu? --Fantastic4boy 09:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Touch opposite gender by their clothing, not skin

message: My logic tells me that touching another person who is not in taharat (such as by a handshake with) should break your taharat too. But this is not included in the list. The same should extend on all material objects: if a clean thing has touched an unclean thing, it cannot be considered clean anymore. Just my reasoning. Does it agree with Islam?—6birc (talk) 08:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not exactly, once you're clean by "Wudu" getting your hands dirty in a reasonable measure is not a problem,
you can just wash your hands and you're still clean. The consept is sort of inner purity, what spoils the ablution
comes from within you: urine, sperm, blood, cursing, bad thoughts etc. You have no way of knowing who is clean and who is not.
Islam is simple to the one who keep faith. Only in Allah. Ujjie104 (talk) 17:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touching another person who is not in ''[[taharat]]'' 

message: There are four fard (obligatory) acts are clearly stated in the Quran see http://wikilivres.info/wiki/The_Holy_Qur%27an/Al-Meada verse 6 translated by Abdullah Yusuf Ali at wikilivres.info.
"O ye who believe! when ye prepare for prayer, wash your faces, and your hands (and arms) to the elbows; Rub your heads (with water); and (wash) your feet to the ankles."The Holy Qur'an/Al-Meada(The Table) verse 6 (wikilivres.info)  
see also the 2 below links
The Holy Qur'an - original source (1917, revised 1920), by Maulana Muhammad Ali at wikisource see http://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=File:Maulana_Muhammad_Ali_Quran.djvu&page=370
The Holy Qur'an (1917, revised 1920), by Maulana Muhammad Ali at wikisource http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Holy_Qur%27an_(Maulana_Muhammad_Ali)/5._The_Food
Nasserb786 (talk) 06:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quran & Wudu

message: for Wahabis please see section onWahabis.
Wahabism is a conservative form of Sunni Islam
for Shia Islam see section on shia islam
Nasserb786 (talk) 06:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wahabis

message: Invalidation section states no sources. Rewrite required 129.67.55.153 (talk) 19:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalidation Section 

message: What are the rules about using soap during wudu? The web seems to say it is either unneccessary or that washing with soap does not count towards wudu, but can be done before and/or after. What about antibacterial cleansers? Washing the body with soap is substantially more effective at removing bacteria and viruses, although rinsing with clean water alone does have an effect.
Also, information on the history of wudu would be interesting. Did wudu protect pre-modern Muslims against contagious diseases? In the modern world, is there any evidence that people aren't using soap, when it would be beneficial? I realize that wudu is intended to be a spiritual ablution or cleansing, but having to wash five times a day must have some kind of health effect. 
I don't know much at all about the subject, so I don't want to add material myself. Roches (talk) 21:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of soap or other disinfectants 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Wudu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525070903/http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/004.sbt.html to http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/004.sbt.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110513235949/http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/muslim/002.smt.html to http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/muslim/002.smt.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.faizaneislam.org/islam/islam_wudu.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Salam. I think the article's head picture should be changed. Surely we will find a picture of someone performing ablution somewhere online. Let someone change it, please. (I would have done it if I knew how to.) Waliyullah Tunde (talk) 14:43, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Picture