lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Andrew Jackson High School (Jacksonville)

message: This article needs to be re-formatted per the Wikipedia Manual of Style.  Or, please check other similar school pages, and try to format this page to match. I've also placed a  tag on the article, to alert other editors that it needs cleanup.  There's quite a backlog though and this could take months, so anyone else that wants to take on the job, that would be very helpful, thank you.  And if you have any questions, let us know! --Elonka 01:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Recently there has been what seem to be a series of anonymous edits from some similar IP addresses adding a person named Langdon (Dan) Campbell to the Notable Alumni list, listing him as an author. Each time this edit has been removed as non notable by registered editors, the name has been added back anonymously by the same IP address or one with only the final octet slightly different. There is also a suspicion, based on edit comments, that the person adding the name may be Mr. Campbell himself. I left a message on the Talk page of the most recent IP informing them of Wikipedia's policies on notability and using Wikipedia as a platform for self promotion. I also invited that editor to discuss their justification of notability of Mr. Campbell on this page. I hope the community can resolve this issue and prevent what seems to be a possible Edit War. Subwayatrain (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This continues to be a problem. Hopefully the IP editor(s) will read the talk page. Notability should be established prior to putting the name on the page. If Mr. Campbell is notable, the IP editor should put together his references and give Mr. Campbell his own wikipedia page, then link to it under the notables section. Redrocket (talk) 07:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Continuing to happen... Same IP address except for the last octet each time. Still sending messages to each IP as it happens. Subwayatrain (talk) 04:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Langdon (Dan) Campbell - Notability 
Talk:Glossa Ordinaria

message: Mesdames et Messieurs, let the discussion of the Glossa Ordinaria begin!Metrodorus 01:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

message: The historian of science, David C. Lindberg maintains that this text originated with Anselm of Laon and his followers in his Science in the Middle Ages (1978)  on page 525, which is not as early as the origin date implied here... Stevenmitchell (talk) 03:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Glossa Ordinaria
Talk:Fly captain

message: Talk:Fly Captain 
Fly Captain is not really a theater term. It is a politically correct term.
The crew person in charge of the Fly Rail Or Fly System is called the Flyman.
Delete the word fly captain and replace with Flyman.
A fly captain is in charge of a fly crew which operates a fly system in a theatrical production. Ordinarily a fly captain will coordinate with the set designer to get flying scenery safely into the fly loft and to plan flyrail cues. The fly captain is usually responsible for all matters of safety involving the fly system and also for making sure rail cues are executed quickly and properly. The fly captain supervises the loading and unloading of counterweights in a fly system.
Theater22 01:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Taipei–Keelung metropolitan area

message: Does the ROC officially recognize this medium-level administrative entity or is this article just a creation of a user, thus, lacking official status? AFAIK, in the ROC the sub-province level entities are Municipalities as Taibei and Gaoxiong, Provincial cities like Tainan (till the end of 2010) and County-controlled cities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.88.227.176 (talk) 12:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is not meant to be an administrative entity. It's meant to bridge the gap between the administrative entities of Taipei, Taipei County, and Keelung, and the reality of the metropolitan area. See Seoul National Capital Area, Greater Tokyo Area, Greater Mexico City, New York metropolitan area, Mumbai Metropolitan Region, Keihanshin, etc. -Multivariable (talk) 13:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  doubts about the utility of this article: 

message: Where would Pinglin belong on Taipei–Keelung metropolitan area#Geographical Subdivision? It seems to be the only district in Taipei, New Taipei, and Keelung which is missing. Railtransportfan (talk) 01:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinglin District
Talk:Camille Roqueplan

message: What was his cause of death at 53 years old? Stevenmitchell (talk) 20:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of Death?
Talk:Marie-Guillemine Benoist

message: How can it be, that the most famous painting of the artist, Portrait of a black woman which is written in wikipedia in five othet languages (even in Hebrew) is not written in the English Wikipedia? Can anyone write it? 
Danny-w (talk) 15:08, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait of a black woman 
Talk:Édouard de Verneuil

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Felix Legueu - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Albert-Félix de Lapparent

message: Brachiosaurus atalaiensis is now Lusotitan (Mateus and Antunes 2003), while Elaphrosaurus gautieri is now Spinostropheus (Sereno, Wilson, and Conrad, 2004). For clarity's sake, Camarasaurus alenquerensis was a new combination for Apatosaurus alenquerensis by McIntosh (1990) based on supposed shared characters between Lourinhasaurus and Camarasaurus (refuted by Dantas et. al., 1998, who erected Lourinhasaurus for Apatosaurus alenquerensis).
M. T. Antunes and O. Mateus. 2003. Dinosaurs of Portugal. Comptes Rendus Palevol 2:77-95 [M. Carrano/M. Carrano/M. Carrano]
P. C. Sereno, J. A. Wilson, and J. L. Conrad. 2004. New dinosaurs link southern landmasses in the mid-Cretaceous. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271(1546):1325-1330 [M. Carrano/M. Carrano/M. Carrano]
P. Dantas, J. L. Sanz, C. M. Silva, F. Ortega, V. F. Santos and M. Cachão. 1998. Lourinhasaurus n. gen. Novo dinossáurio saurópode do Juássico superior (Kimeridgiano superior-Titoniano inferior) de Portugal [Lourinhasaurus n. gen. New sauropod dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic (upper Kimmeridgian-lower Tithonian) of Portugal]. Actas do V Congresso Nacional de Geologia (Resumos Alargados). Comunicações del Instituto Geológico e Mineiro 84(1):A91-A94 [M. Carrano/M. Carrano]
J. S. McIntosh. 1990. Species determination in sauropod dinosaurs with tentative suggestions for their classification. In K. Carpenter and P. J. Currie (eds.), Dinosaur Systematics: Perspectives and Approaches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 53-69 72.194.120.176 (talk) 15:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Treaty of Tolentino

message: Bits of this are incomprehensible, e.g.:
"Of the French terms, the confiscation of artistic works - or, as many considered it, theft and plunder - came under criticism and its legitimacy questioned." If you know what it is meant to say, could you correct it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.235.212.17 (talk) 17:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible
Talk:Fates Worse Than Death

message: I replaced the characterization that Vonnegut found the text of the Roman Catholic requiem mass offensive with his own words, "terrible and sadistic."  The source does use the word "offensive," but that seems to be the writer's own interpretation; and that word does not ring true as somethin Vonnegut would have said or thought.  It's preferable to use Vonnegut's own words, since we have them.  --Amble (talk) 18:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Requiem "offensive" or "terrible and sadistic"

message: I believe it should just state Kurt Vonnegut in the lead because that is what the author is more well known as.Ryan Vesey (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Should Kurt Vonnegut Jr. be changed to Kurt Vonnegut in the lead?
Talk:Prototheria

message: This article was blanked and redirected to Yinotheria last December, apparently without discussion.  Looking at the first two pages of entries of Google searches for prototheria and yinotheria (some details below) it seems clear that the claim of protetheria’s demise is premature, so I have restored the article.  I’ll post notices on WP:Mammals and WP:Paleontology (where I found out about it) to solicit more informed opinions than my own.
Search details:</br>
The first two pages of the “prototheria” and “yinotheria” searches yielded two university hits for prototheria and one for yinotheria;  The University of California Museum of Paleontology’s entry on monotremes, the University of Texas at El Paso’s Centennial Museum and Department of Biology’s entry on subclass prototheria, and “Mikko’s phylogeny archive”’s entry on Mammals at the University of Finland, Helsinki, respectively.  The Berkeley and UTEP sites mention prototheria but not yinotheria.  The Helsinki site (though not exactly authoritative for the English language Wikipedia) lists 4 possible taxonomy schemes, two using prototheria and one using yinotheria.
Also from the prototheria (and a little further) search, Britannica has an entry on prototheria  but not yinotheria  as does oxfordreference.com   .  (Oxfordreference.com appears to be from the Oxford University Press , so maybe this should be included with the university references.)
Also from the yinotheria (and a little further) search, the Encyclopedia of Life has many more entries for prototheria  than yinotheria  and the Paleobiology Database has three entries under prototheria , but none under yinotheria and considers yinotheria “disused” .</br>
--Wikimedes (talk) 04:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prototheria and yinotheria
Talk:Federalist No. 45

message: The Historical Implications section strikes me as pretty opinionated.  The initial quote is from a NY Times Opinion piece, which is a troubling start, and later experiences with states nullifying Federal drug law and immigration policy argue against its conclusion.  The following statement that "The 10th Amendment… has preserved the powers of the federal and state governments until present day since 1791," is completely unsupported by the source given, and would be hard to definitively justify in any case.  The whole section seems motivated by an urge to provide a conclusion, and I think the article would be more appropriate if the section were simply removed rather than rewritten. Jason Fruit (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Federalist No. 46

message: Gibbon makes this same statement about the size of a standing army in Chapter V of Volume I, published in 1776. Obviously both he and Madison got it somewhere else but I'm having no luck finding it on Google. Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?
100.15.127.199 (talk) 16:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  one hundredth of the population
Talk:Louis Delgrès

message: This needs some more details:
"After realizing that he could not prevail and refusing to surrender, Delgrès left with 400 men and some women."
How could 400 people just up and leave while under siege?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.95.56.66 (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The short answer is that there was a back door. In the corresponding French Wikipedia article, it's noted specifically that he and (uncounted) others left by "la poterne du Galion à l'arrière du fort", the postern at the Galion River at the back of the fort. A satellite view of the fort (now Fort Degrès, appropriately) shows the Galion nearby. Triplingual (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left?
Talk:Federalist No. 52

message: The link to the page containing the paper itself appears to have been deleted recently....
This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
    05:49, 14 January 2012 Hesperian (Talk | contribs) deleted "The Federalist Papers/No. 52" ‎ (WS:CSD M2 - Unneeded redirects: content was: '#REDIRECT The Federalist (Dawson)/51' (and the only contributor was 'Spangineer's bot')) 
There are other pages however and a host of confusion regarding the number of the essay.  Seems there are two versions of the number system Dawson's and Ford's.
The Federalist (Dawson)
The Federalist (Ford)
It seems fairly late in the day to still have this much confusion regarding numbering of the works and only confuses readers.  How to resolve and clean this up..I have no idea.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbmaise (talk • contribs) 10:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Paper numbers and deleted references
Talk:Ficciones

message: The text of the article currently notes that Ficciones was translated into English in 1962 by an "Anthony Boucher".  What's our source for this?  I own a 1963 edition of Grove Press's 1962 English edition of Ficciones, and it attributes the translation into English to Emece Editores in 1956.  It lists the editor as "Anthony Kerrigan" and makes no mention of any Boucher.  Do we need to correct the article, or am I misinformed? User:Jwrosenzweig editing as 71.239.174.150 (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected, thanks. Xanthoxyl < 09:20, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, now it attributes the translation to an "Anthony Bonner", who is redlinked.  Is someone having a bit of fun here, or is poor Anthony the man of a thousand surnames?  It's a trivial detail to get right, but I'm baffled why we keep getting it wrong.  Or, again, is my edition (which I'll admit is simply a paperback edition that might possibly contain an error) wrong to identify the editor as Anthony Kerrigan? 71.239.174.150 (talk) 07:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems it was translated by several people who were not credited properly in the first edition. Xanthoxyl < 18:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See http://www.complete-review.com/reviews/borgesjl/ficciones.htm for a potentially complete-list of this title's translators. (IIRC each story in the Grove Press edition has the translator's name, at the end. I'm not at home this week so cannot check.) Anthonys Bonner, Boucher, and Kerrigan, have all translated various of Borges' works. –Quiddity (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Translator's identity
Talk:Plaine Corail Airport

message: Can anyone find a reliable source to show that the name has been returned to the original name (Plaine Corail)? The best I have found is a 2017 ref stating that the renaming was proposed. https://defimedia.info/rodrigues-renaming-islands-airport-creates-political-stir  There are current aviation references that call it Sir Gaëtan Duval. If it has been renamed again we'll need to do some rewriting and move the article, but blanking the first part of the article and all reference to this name  is not the way to go. Meters (talk) 23:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, on rereading that it appears that it does support that the renaming actually happened. Meters (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  renaming
Talk:Final Diagnosis

message: Thanks for allowing editing. I had read a book FINAL DIAGNOSIS in 1960s or 70s,the plot of which was completely different.In the book I am referring to(I do not recall author's name), consultant pathologist of a US hospital goes to airport with his wife to receive a junior pathologist appointed under him. While returning from airport,their car is hit by a truck entering from a side road killing the senior pathologist's wife. Loss of wife breaks him down. The story goes on...... He becomes more and more careless and,looses contact with recent advances. The junior fall in love with a nurse in the same hospital. The nurse, gets injured in the knee while diving in the swimming pool. The swelling does not go with routine treatment. A biopsy is submitted for diagnosis. The senior misdiagnoses it. The swelling keeps growing. The biopsy is reviewed and OSTEOSARCOMA is diagnosed by the junior using more recent techniques. The senior is sacked and packs up. n real life,relationship of trauma to tumor is a really confusing factor resulting in wrong diagnosis. (Dr.P.K Shukla,ex professor Pathology,Institute of Medical Sciences,Banaras Hindu University,Varanasi India) - contribution by non-logged in person - Copied from article section by SimonLyall (talk) 23:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the book being referred to is The Final Diagnosis by Arthur Hailey. FerdinandFrog (talk) 18:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another book with same title?
Talk:Final Exit

message: I agree that the section "appears to contain trivial, minor, or unrelated references to popular culture." 
The guideline WP:RS says, "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered." 
If these references are not cited by at least more than one WP:RS, they don't belong in the article. I don't think any of those references meet that test. I think the whole section should be deleted. --Nbauman (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in pop culture
Talk:Finding Cassie Crazy

message: Can we ban or block ISP:71.207.13.160 from editing this page, he did six different vandalism, interlocking all of them (preventing them from being undone)I had to edit them back manually clear vandlzim can we at least ban him from editing this page.--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 22:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banning a user 

message: There was a section titled "Blurb," which I'm assuming is the jacket copy. I'm going to remove that, since it is similar to a teaser which does not belong on novel pages. Roseclearfield (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blurb removal 
Talk:Finding Darwin's God

message: I found :Image:0060930497.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:0060930497.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg]]

message: :Image:0060930497.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:0060930497.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
Talk:Finding the Truth in Judging the Companions

message: (add more info)(plzzzz)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.18.0.144 (talk) 02:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

message: It says "Companinons"; it should say "Companions".  Could someone change the title?  Thanks! Jesus geek (talk) 12:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling mistake
Talk:Audrey Pulvar

message: Audrey Pulvar is just a news anchor for a French cable news network. Her biography is not very extensive and doesn't include any encyclopedia-worthy events, except for the fact that she is the daughter of Marc Pulvar. She is also in a relationship with French politician Arnaud Montebourg, but I don't think that makes her encyclopedia material.
Removal requested! Cyspin 08:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal request
Talk:Amédée Bollée

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Photograph of the subject should be added 
*Some basic biographical information lacking
*Lead needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*Information on work should be expanded, and put into context of other inventors
*Some references present, but some material unsourced; better quality references would be advantageous
Espresso Addict 02:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Edmond James de Rothschild

message: Can anyone add anything about the huge tracts of land he bought in the Golan Heights?  Apparently it was still owned by de Rothschild as late as 1930.203.184.41.226 (talk) 05:15, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land in Palestine
Talk:Maine de Biran

message: This article seems weird? I would recommend downgrading it. It is lacking in material and its current material isn't very well written. Eh, what can you expect on a page about an obscure 18th century French philosopher.
It contradicts itself fairly badly in the first section:
The first paragraph says: "He entered politics and was part of the Conseil des Cinq Cents."
The next paragraph then goes on to mention "Having been excluded from the Council of the Five Hundred..."
The discussion of de Biran's philosophy is hard to read, as well. It also mischaracterizes de Biran as an esoteric, historical philsopher. At the very least he inspired Merlau-Ponty (one of the pillar thinkers of phenomenology) and is one of the first philosophers of mind to break with Cartesianism. (As casually mentioned in the side box, where his tagline "volo ergo sum" is mentioned, but not explained.)
My reference is Giovanna Colombetti's "The Feeling Body" (MIT Press), pages 7-11, section 1.3 :"Enter the Lived Body: From Maine de Biran’s Experience of Effort to
Henry’s “Interior Quivering”.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.127.197.107 (talk) 05:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality Issues
Talk:Antoine Destutt de Tracy

message: There seems to be some confusions
1] "Tracy reacted to the terroristic phase of the revolution (during the Napoleonic regime)"
* The Reign of Terror is one thing
* The First French Empire is quite another
Between those two, Napoléon Bonaparte played increasingly leading roles in the successive forms of the French First Republic
2] "… which he often hurled against his liberal foes in Tracy's Institutional …"
It is not clear at all what "Tracy's Institutional" would be, and the link to Institution seems quite out of place. There may be some relation to the Institut de France, of which Tracy was a founding member indeed, but of course did not possess.  Noliscient (talk) 12:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ''Biography'' section needs some attention 

message: Values 1.37.87.82 (talk) 01:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology