lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Liberals for Forests

message: I can't find the discussion regarding the page move, so I'll just kick in here.  
*I've reopened this move proposal as I just found this article and it seems to me that the previous vote was clouded by a merge issue.-- Ian ≡ talk 16:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because the media has largely decided on a certain form doesn't make it correct. I think the AEC and WAEC evidence is more than enough. I've read somewhere that the lowercase is used to increase percieved separateness from the Liberal Party of Australia. matturn 08:24, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm genuinely not sure which of those leads is right, but please don't merge the lowercase one into this one unless you're prepared to do some serious fact-checking. I tried quite hard to merge the lowercase article when I found it, but I found so many factual errors that I gave up in frustration. Ambi 23:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC I had copious links to various reputable newspaper articles supporting everything I'd put in the article. Unlike false statements like lff is an offshoot of the Liberal Party which somehow has managed to remain, and unsourced at that. matturn 08:24, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: *Support Note that merging will have to take place. The second article is more detailed (and yes, authored by me.) - matturn 16:17, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because the media has largely decided on a certain form doesn't make it correct. I think the AEC and WAEC evidence is more than enough. I've read somewhere that the lowercase is used to increase percieved separateness from the Liberal Party of Australia. matturn 08:24, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: I just came along to do the merge but found a few issues:
*Which is correct:
**Liberals for forests: [[is not connected to either the  Liberal Party
**Liberals for Forests: Liberals for Forests is an Australian political minor party, an offshoot of the Liberal Party of Australia.
*Should  be included when the party itself is not listed?
violet/riga (t) 21:59, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm genuinely not sure which of those leads is right, but please don't merge the lowercase one into this one unless you're prepared to do some serious fact-checking. I tried quite hard to merge the lowercase article when I found it, but I found so many factual errors that I gave up in frustration. Ambi 23:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC I had copious links to various reputable newspaper articles supporting everything I'd put in the article. Unlike false statements like lff is an offshoot of the Liberal Party which somehow has managed to remain, and unsourced at that. matturn 08:24, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger issues 

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. 
I've contacted a few editors involved here and I guess it's going to remain a stalemate...
Also, to propose a merger you should probably use Wikipedia:Proposed mergers.
WhiteNight T | @ | C 03:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result
Talk:Ramsey–Lewis method

message: The example at the end looks faulty as P3 isn't used. Ben Finn 17:00, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It would appear to be so, but the 3 principles are not the properties. The assumptions are integrated in the text, as we can see from the mentioning of the word "tickles" and "cause lightning" (it would be even more abstract to designate "causes lightning" by some symbol, and I do not think that it would add to the article). No, P1 is the property of "electronhood" as outlined in the article, and P2 is the property of charge (so the statements in the parenthesis are equivalent to the assumptions, if you do the substitution) . I, too, was confused by this, but I am going to go ahead and clarify it.--Orthologist (talk) 11:37, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:HMS Triumph (N18)

message: I have seen a picture of this Triumph in dry-dock, with her bows blown-off upto and past some of the bow-caps, after hitting a mine. The torpedo tubes were all loaded at the time of the explosion, but none of the torpedoes went-off even though some were torn completely in half. In the picture, the remaining tail-half of one torpedo could be clearly seen within one of the tubes, the others having fallen or been blown-out at the time of the explosion.
Seems her luck finally ran out when it came to mines.
:Someone has since added the picture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.247.9 (talk) 18:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I've just seen it, thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.126.91 (talk) 20:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/open tasks/Linguistics

message: I've placed the Linguistics section on its own subpage to make it more watchable. Also, since there are several contributors now, it might be nice to have our own Talk page. If it doesn't work out, it's easily revertible. — mark ✎ 18:04, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: The Aryan page has been listed because it suffers from "a dearth of organization, riddled with apparent confusion." It might be worth noting this this article is only partly about linguistics, the concept of 'Aryan' covers a great deal more than language and is inherently liable to 'apparent confusion' because of its multiple overlapping meanings. As it happens, I think it is explained about as clearly as is possible, however it would be useful if the person or persons who identified the 'apparent confusion' could say just what it is. There are a few dodgy bits (I'm not too sure about the passage about Assyrians), but most of it seems OK to me in its current form. Any comments? Paul B 19:57, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible that the article has been cleaned up since it was first listed.  If you think it no longer deserves special attention, feel free to move it to "Satisfactory".  If someone notices something wrong with it again, they can always move it back onto Open Tasks.  Cheers, BanyanTree 22:31, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the reply. Possibly it has been improved. However, my real problem is that I don't really know what the systemic bias is supposed to be. Bad organisation and confusion are lamentable, but are not systemic bias.Paul B 12:45, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean. It is possible that it was an erroneous listing but I don't know enough of the subject to be sure. You could try asking User:Zosodada, who added it in this edit. — mark ✎ 15:05, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Aryan

message: I'm glad that this page itself remains a neutral tone. I agree that there is systemic bias, but feel that people are simply writing what they know about. Will contribute modestly (I'm just a student, after all) after Christmas.--Ling.Nut 15:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  good topic
Category talk:Places in Hong Kong

message: *This category was listed for deletion on April 6, 2005. The consensus was to Keep although there was some suggestions for changing Names to Neighborhoods but no clear consensus on that matter. The following discussion from CFD is now closed and should not be modified.
Places is too broad a term. :Category:Places and various subcats were previously deleted along similar lines. See Places CFD discussion. RedWolf 05:16, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
*Keep. This is a category for neighbourhoods, however the term neighbourhood is almost unheard in Hong Kong for this meaning.  — Instantnood 06:49, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
**What word would be appropriate?  -Kbdank71 13:21, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: CFD Discussion
Category talk:Sailboat types

message: *This category was listed for deletion on March 28, 2005. Consensus was to rename but no clear decision reached on a new name so marked Unresolved. The following discussion from CFD is now closed and should not be modified.
Propose deleting this category because it misuses the English language.  This is a related to the :Category:Sailboat Names proposed for deletion on 26 March.<BR>
The reason is that sailboats, in normal usage, are the generally smaller vessels used in sports and personal use.  Yet the introduction of this category (almost identical to that of "Sailboat Names") says (paragraphs run together) that "Category Sailboat types captures the the type name or class name of all types/classes of boat whose primary means of propulsion is by sails.  e.g Dinghies, Warships, Merchant Ships, Racing Yachts, Skiffs, Windsurfers, Exploration Ships, Clippers etc etc.  This Category does not capture the names of specific sailing yachts/boats/ships etc whos names are gathered in the Sailboat Names category."  This is just plain wrong.  Let each member of this category proposed for deletion be placed in :Category:Sailing ships or :Category:Sailboats or some other category which is appropriate.  Each might have to be reviewed. Gene Nygaard 12:37, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: CFD Discussion
Talk:Bahá'í months

message: I don't see the point of this page. All the relevant information is already presented in Bahá'í_calendar (where it is better presented at that), with the exception of the translations. But I don't see the point of the translations. Shouldn't one looking for the Baha'i months in a given language just go to the Wikipedia for that language? Dremo 19:00, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. If someone has time it would be a good idea to move any bits over to the calendar page and then start a vote for deletion of this page. Translations are pretty pointless. -- Tomhab 19:40, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This got orphaned. I'm going to move and redirect. Cuñado  - Talk 06:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Relevancy
Talk:Super Eurobeat

message: Can I recommend that new albums aren't added unless some encyclopedic commentary goes with them, like which bands are new, or which tracks got most radio play. Kappa 19:19, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: On April 13, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Super Eurobeat for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 18:01, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: Regarding this section: Super Eurobeat#Defunct_Super_Eurobeat_labels
I found a valid link from Web Archive where it can be found the original postal address of the A-Beat C studio (Rogers Studio) is no longer belonging to the studio:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130623213716/http://www.rodgersmusic.com:80/index_file/Page382.htm
It seems the studio broke and now there is another company whom purchased the same building.
AMB zanzariere (now known as http://www.zanzar.it/)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lapc506 (talk • contribs) 15:24, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification of A-Beat C as defunct studio
Talk:List of sovereign states without armed forces

message: Hey, @Matthew hk, we're edit conflicting, so I'm stopping! Just revert me however you like!  —valereee (talk) 18:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, may be i should just check how many comment are unsigned and leave it to bot. I think the manual checking has cause nuisance and edit conflict. Matthew hk (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  archiving 

message: Matthew hk has tied in some disruptive edits in his manual archiving exercise by moving around some comments to the wrong locations, e.g., a response to the case of the Cook Islands to that of Sealand. Don't think any reasonable editor who's actually read could have committed such errors and it's difficult to assume that he acted in good faith. I have partially reverted his edits by relocating some of the  tags he's added. I hope some "experienced" editors may remind him that he gotta be prudent, careful and responsible. 220.246.55.231 (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. You guys are making yourself trouble Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/14.0.180.170/Archive. Matthew hk (talk) 08:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

text: Also, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Please instruct how to deal with ip hopping, meat and suspected offsite canvassing from a lot of ip ranges from HK. Matthew hk (talk) 10:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:Matthew hk's disruptive edits tied in 

message: i saw that the State of Palestine's security forces lack of a standing military force and have limited military,can it enter on this list? Kalininos (talk) 00:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a bit of a different situation, with the lack of a standing military force existing in the context of occupation and a lack of effective statehood. There might be sources discussing this explicitly in the context of the Oslo Accords, but I can't find something at a quick glance. CMD (talk) 02:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about Palestine
Talk:Zatch Bell!

message: Does anyone know what the fighting song on episode 8 is called, when Gash is fighting Kuroro? --208.179.66.227 (talk) 01:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a forum. You have to check the soundtrack information from some other site. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 02:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 8 Battle Music 

message: *vol.1
--Gabriel Yuji (talk) 21:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Apparently the movies are finally being released in the US on Blu Ray in March  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.38.150.190 (talk) 20:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Blu-Ray Movies in US

message: I found new information that could shed some light on the production of Zatch Bell! and its cessation in North America.
 Nebulous2357 (talk) 21:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Production of the manga

message: I'm rewriting the article using TextEdit as an external sandbox. You can help by sending me reliable references and sources related to Zatch Bell! in any language, making sure to translate them to English. Nebulous2357 (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting the page
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-04-11/Encarta editing

message: :Magnus Manske noted that the oblique reference on Encarta's feedback information page to "open-content encyclopedias found elsewhere on the Web" was "a not-so-subtle hint that this feature has been brought about by Wikipedia".
The quote attributed to Magnus was not actually made by him, but me. See http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2005-April/038716.html. Pcb21| Pete 19:48, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that!  I've corrected it now.  Worldtraveller 20:54, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Andrew McDermot

message: Lead paragraph needs to be reworked so it is clear why he is notable. Have to read for a long time to figure it out. Fawcett5 19:55, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, hi Christie, I didn't even realise it was your article - should have figured though given the subject area. Fawcett5 02:04, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Methods

message: I guess I don't understand why this redirects to "Baconian method", which is just one type of method.  I put this in expecting a disambiguation page so I could pick out Methods as in terms of object_oriented_programming.  I think it would be better if this was redirected to the method disambiguation page.  If anything, Baconian method should possibly be mentioned on the method page.  So I'm switching the redirect.--Cwebber 20:05, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of craters on the Moon: A–B

message: I started adding the date range of the eponymous individual's life spans. This was done due to some ambiguities encountered after following the name link. The range helps pin down which of the individuals listed is correct. It would be preferable, though, if the link pointed to the correct person's page, but they have an unfortunate habit of being moved around. So if you encounter such a move caused by dmg, please change the link on this page to point to the new page. Thank you. — RJH 20:14, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: For the origin of the Béla name ("Slavic female name") see .  That website is the official source for nomenclature not just for the Moon, but for all named features on all solar system bodies (planets, satellites, and even a few asteroids). Note, to find it in alphabetical order you have to look for "B|%la" which comes after Byrgius (that's their way of encoding accents).   From what I understand, "Bela" might be a Hungarian male name as in "Bela Lugosi", but Hungarian is not a Slavic language. -- Curps 16:33, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Béla
Talk:List of Long Islanders

message: *Please limit new additions to those persons who have a wiki article written about them.  If you would really like to add a person to this list who does not have a wiki, then add the name and also start a referenced article about him/her.  Persons added to this list without appropriate references as to who they are and why they are important can be deleted according to wikipedia's policy of providing reasonable references.
Repliedthemockturtle (talk) 00:44, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: A page similar to this one. List of people from San Francisco, is currently under review as an article for deletion, for reasons which would apply to this article as well.  I am conducting an RfC on the talk page of the above-mentioned list to determine whether the concensus agrees on keeping such lists or not.  Any and all comments are more than welcome.  Badbilltucker 16:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment 

message: Why should this page be limited to Nassau and Suffolk counties? Is there some reason that it would be bad for someone to show up on both List of people from New York City and this list? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: But it just is not true to say "Raised on Long Island (but not born on Long Island)" when two of the three included were born in NYC part of the island. Maybe they were not "Long Isladers" by birth, but Derrick Adkins and Moira Kelly were born and raised on Long Island. 82.141.73.182 (talk) 23:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why should this page be limited to Nassau and Suffolk counties 

message: Hololive VTuber Gawr Gura is from Long Island, is it okay if she is featured here? 2603:6080:7F08:9F00:6478:3849:66E5:6B9 (talk) 23:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: Possible addition: Sugar and Spice (drag queens) ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sugar and Spice (drag queens)
Talk:Function generator

message: "Thanks!" to Omegatron for adding the image of the waveforms; that was something this article really needed for completeness!
Atlant 15:40, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: -)  — Omegatron 23:33, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waveform pictures 

message: It has been suggested that this article be merged with Signal generator.
I believe this would be a mistake. "Function generators" are a very specialized portion of the vastly-larger world of generic signal generators. Besides function generators, signal generators include such beasts as low distortion audio generators, noise generators, microwave generators, sweepers, synthesized signal generators, and so on.
I beleieve that the articles are correctly factored as they stand.
Atlant 14:45, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that some words (possible those supra) in the respective articles to compare and contrast the two types of instruments would benefit the reader and prevent a future attempt to merge. Cutler 23:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: :So... What is a Function Generator used for? It doesn't say at all in the article. Whynotbeme2 (talk) 22:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use
Talk:Ray Mears

message: http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a77/darkcrown_1969/DSC03768.jpg
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a77/darkcrown_1969/DSC03766.jpg
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a77/darkcrown_1969/DSC03771.jpg
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkcrown (talk • contribs) 17:57, 21 June 2009
: If you own the copyright to those pictures, please upload them to Wikipedia Commons so that they can be included in the article properly. We do not normally link to Photobucket from articles. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instructors Woodlore Knife 

message: Just letting you know that I am the mother of Dan Hume and as such assert myself as a reliable source regarding paragraph three of section "Educational role". DebbyH (talk) 14:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational role  

message: What the HECK happend to this article , it was full a year ago and now , 60% stuff is missing , what the heck is wikipedia doing 
Rebuild the article like it was , i won't fix somebody's else crap , where's the part when Ray Mears describes Bear Grylls as a "boy scout" ... I didn't find that on the Bear's article either ... wikipedia will destroy it self with this stupid rules of needing "reliable sources" so much , and those wannabe pick sources from mainstream media who allways lies the most. Xowets (talk) 13:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For example this http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1057485/Ray-Mears-IS-tougher-admits-Bear-Grylls.html , you can also see all those mainstream comments about how Bear is "cooler and better" , but those are idiots who watch the show and think it's real , to confirm this , you see overwhelmingly positive comment rating towards Ray Mears(and negative for Bear). Xowets (talk) 13:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF 

message: The article is not in compliance with the Wikipedia policy: Biographies of living persons and as a result, I have removed significant unsourced material --Senra (talk) 18:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material removed 

message: I'm listening to him on Radio 4's Desert Island Discs" now, and he's just mentioned his new partner called Ruth.
Meltingpot (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal life