Talk:Institutional Revolutionary Party

message: :Some academics discuss whether the PRI regime can even be considered totalitarian or authoritarian. (from the first paragraph)
Could someone cite a source for these academics? While I'd agree that PRI rule was not totalitarian, the belief that it wasn't authoritarian would be a fringe view. --metzerly 03:55, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PRI not "authoritarian"?

message: The NPOV tag was added by an anonymous editor who didn't sign any comment on this talk page;  nor are they any serious POV discussions here.  I'm removing it. --01:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Tag Removed

message: Apart from the fact that Calles himself was an acknowledged Freemason, it would not be a bad idea to describe the role of Masons within the IRP, and how they often used the organization to consolidate their influence within Mexican politics and society. ADM (talk) 08:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Role of Freemasonry

message: I had the idea that this party, despite his socialist roots, was largely seen as a neoliberal, at least centrist party. Socialist and social-democratic means basically the same.81.193.188.147 (talk) 01:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The ideology is republicanism and "no re-eleccion" historically combined with agrarianism today with neoliberalism.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 22:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Neoliberal Party?

message: (Spanish: "Partido de la Revolución Mexicana", PRM) whose aim was to establish a democracy of workers and socialism.
"democracy of workers and socialism" makes zero sense. This needs to be edited in order to make it intelligible.
::I'm supposing what what meant was for workers, then "and socialism" adding the term to indicate its ideology. The Big Hoof! (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "revolutionary party" = lol 

message: Can someone explain what this sentence means:  "Institutionalism in Mexico is a concept that is based in the non-morphological character of consolidated human organizations, having the particular feature of belonging to its determinated legal field and settled as the highest manifestation of social common issues, as well as people use to go in and outside the objective legal field. In its origins, it was determined that institutionalism would be the only way to solve social problems as humans establish their differences and common similarities."?  Bookbrad (talk) 21:26, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-morphological character? 

message: Hey , you , Gustavo Diaz Ordaz wasnt the one who made the order to kill the students , is was Luis Evecherria ,Gustavo wasnt in the country .--Puchianos86 (talk) 23:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tlatelolco 1968 

message: Multiple sections (specifically the subsections of "Return of the PRI") are not written in an encyclopedic tone, neutrally, and give undue weight (see WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE). I will tag the article and try to do some clean-up, but I don't feel like getting into a political war here with those trying to push a certain agenda. MX (✉ • ✎) 05:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not think, there is undue weight people in Mexico clearly perceive the PRI as a corrupt political party. And many perceive their long extended rule of almost a century,  as a dictature. And every scandall is sourced. In fact, I think the article is generous to the party, it could make it look even worse if it were really were better edited.Rosvel92 (talk) 05:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I am working my way through the article, Wikifying existing text and adding text with citations. I don't have a political agenda for the edits. Fairly soon, I'd like to suggest that the NPOV and UNDUE tags be removed. Amuseclio (talk) 17:36, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violations of NPOV and UNDUE 

message: Is the most corrupted political party in Mexico  Yaneth99 (talk) 15:40, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PRI corruption  

message: There is apparently an issue with the introductory portion of the article as follows:
 Throughout its nine-decade existence, the PRI has adopted a very wide array of ideologies (often determined by the President of the Republic in turn). In the 1980s, the party went through reforms that shaped its current incarnation, with policies characterized as centre-right, such as the privatization of State-run companies, closer relations with the Catholic church, and embracing free-market capitalism. At the same time, the left-wing members of the party abandoned the PRI and founded the Party of the Democratic Revolution (Partido de la Revolución Democrática, PRD) in 1989.
 Though it is a full member of the Socialist International (along with its rival, the left-wing PRD; Mexico is one of the few nations with two major, competing parties that are part of the same international grouping), the PRI is not considered a social democratic party in the traditional sense. 
Please discuss what needs to be altered from this.Gumbi93 (talk) 15:33, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Untrue" clarification needed 

message: In my assessment, the tags are no longer necessary, but I would like to hear from other Wiki editors about this. Amuseclio (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to remove tags 

message: I added a section on presidential succession before the formation of the party.  It was deleted with the short explanation "Barely relevant to the history of the Party itself."  As an historian, I consider the history and context integral to understanding questions at hand. So I *do* think the political practices and the immediate context are relevant to the formation of the party and I can elaborate further. The issues as I see it are the general lack of parties prior to the formation of the PNR; the principle of no-reelection that Díaz asserted with Juárez and then again with Lerdo, only to abandon it entirely in 1884 to rule until 1911, making no re-election a central tenet of the Mexican Revolution; the Sonoran revolutionary generals' political connections and conflicts and their assertion of power over the civilian Carranza who attempted to impose Bonillas, a civilian and revolutionary nobody as next president; and the crisis that the 1928 assassination of Obregón presented.  I would like to hear further why the Wiki editor did not consider the section relevant. Meantime, I will review the deleted text to make the relevance clearer.Amuseclio (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidential succession before the formation of the party 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Institutional Revolutionary Party's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "terra":
From 1985 Mexico City earthquake: 
From Mario Vargas Llosa: Terra. 2010 October 7. Vargas Llosa a 20 años de "México es una dictadura perfecta" (Vargas Llosa, 20 years after "Mexico is a perfect dictatorship").
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Institutional Revolutionary Party]] 

message: Many sources says that the Institutional Revolutionary Party is a socialdemocratic party in it's latest assembly held last December 2021  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.57.209 (talk) 07:41, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social democracy?