Talk:Mercury Records

message: While at a garage sale one sat I found and bought 2 showcases of the platters golden hits its in a big black frame and 4 gold 45s and 1 gold 33rm and on the bottom there is a plaque and written are the words "To Paul Robbi of the Platters for your one millionth golden record. and has thier greatest hits. Smoke gets in your eyes, Would like to know what they are worth, please.—207.200.116.14 18:55, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: (This is probably too late, and you probably forgot you posted here, but…) They are worth whatever someone will pay for them. I realize that's not helpful, but one-of-a-kind items, by their nature, don't have much of a trade history; it's not like you can look to see how much that particular item has recently been selling for. Best you can do is look for similar items and see what kind of prices they fetch, or just put it up on eBay and see what happens. Just in general though, gold record awards generally only go for a couple hundred bucks.—mjb 08:11, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gold record award value

message: We ought to find space for Graham Parker's comments on his time with Mercury Records - "I got Mercury poisoning, it's fatal and it don't get better."  -- Beardo 04:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Graham Parker

message: :Image:Mercury records.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mercury records.gif

message: Usually, record labels which have a global presence have a single article.  Decca Records, the old Bell Records, RCA Records and Columbia Records are good examples.  Should the article on Mercury Records of Australia be merged into this article? Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mercury Records Australia]] merge proposal 

message: The Band the Misfits self-published label's name was Blank. Mercury was interested in using Blank as the name for a side company. They offered the Misfits 30 recording hours at their studios in exchange for the rights for the name (They used this to record Static Age). Well they had/have (do they still?) the rights to that name has anybody heard of what happened to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.162.217.46 (talk) 04:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to Blank Records 

message: It is a matter of fact that Mercury Records was founded in Chicago, Illinois in the United States in 1945. While Mercury was absorbed into Island Records in the U.S., but continues operate as a standalone unit of Universal Music in some other parts of the world, the label is still of American origin so the infobox should clearly state that its country of origin is the U.S. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country of origin 

message: "Bon Jovi announce departure from label with bitter new song"... How does this mean Mercury is out of business? --101.173.103.105 (talk) 09:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct? I don't think so!