Talk:Ziggurat

message: Ziggurat, means "tururu". I didn't even read the whole post because I noticed a lot of it was fake. There is a lot in this topic, and not all of it is fake, but i did notice the fake parts. I think editing this paragraph would be necessary.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.3.152.184 (talk) 13:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some of this is fake... 

message: This article has been protected. Semi-protection prevents edits from unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as edits from any account that is not autoconfirmed (is at least four days old and has ten or more edits to Wikipedia) or confirmed. Such users can request edits to a semi-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the  template if necessary to gain attention.  New users may also request the confirmed user right by visiting Requests for permissions. SilkTork ✔Tea time 00:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection 

message: According to Christopher McIntosh, a historian,  in his book The Astrologers and their Creed, the ziggurats in Babylon (now Iraq) were built for priests to observe the night sky and to record the movements of the planets. I think this is a valid enough piece of information to include, and if no-one adds it, I will next week:) 
Here's the book reference: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=M6I0AAAAMAAJ&q=towers#search_anchor
Thanx
Veryscarymary (talk) 15:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Used by Astrologer/Astronomers

message: this page of Ziggurat should add the sumerian tablet of sichen interpretation of them and the myth of those people 's version of its roots not only the west version. i wish it was more true to the other facts or written from akkhadian's evidential proofs not just the writers' point of view. these monuments are also onw of the wonders as in aztecs. 
76.71.67.190 (talk) 12:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: - Propose your changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2014 

message: The first paragraph of the "Description" section states, "It is assumed that they had shrines at the top, but there is no archaeological evidence for this and the only textual evidence is from Herodotus." The succeeding paragraphs of the same section appear to take it as read that these shrines (or "temples") existed as proven fact.  The entire section has only four cited sources, three of which are not relevant to the issue in question and one of which is attached to the statement I've quoted above.  Can we see some cleanup of the section to reduce the appearance of contradiction? 12.233.147.42 (talk) 01:33, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Something is not right here. The current photo prominently shows armed, Western soldiers climbing (dominating?) a structure build by people from the Ancient Middle East.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:1300:148C:7D43:6C00:C7C:C03F (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better picture is needed 

message: The first sentence of the article says that a ziggurat is "a type of massive stone structure". Really, a stone structure? Weren't they made of bricks? -- Imerologul Valah (talk) 21:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: someone added that last year and no one, including me, noticed. I've removed the word "stone". Thanks, well spotted. Doug Weller talk 09:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stone? What stone? 

message: Could someone add a biography page for archaeologist Harriet Crawford? She is often referenced and quoted in articles on Mesopotamia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg.collver (talk • contribs) 16:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   archaeologist Harriet Crawford