Talk:Ian Eagle

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ian Eagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071016072857/http://nicindy.org/whos_greek/greeks_in_sports/other/Sportscasters%20and%20Sportswriters.php to http://www.nicindy.org/whos_greek/greeks_in_sports/other/Sportscasters%20and%20Sportswriters.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061031111630/http://www.nba.com/nets/game_night_experience/broadcasterbios_011011.html to http://www.nba.com/nets/game_night_experience/broadcasterbios_011011.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Do we really need a week by week listing of which games Eagle called? Personally, I'd say no, but I'd like to have the discussion. I think the excess information falls under WP:INDISCRIMINATE. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think a separate article is the answer here. I think the key takeaway from WP:INDISCRIMINATE is this statement: . In other words, Wikipedia should not try to encompass every bit of arcana about a subject. No other NFL broadcaster's bio includes an exhaustive list of every game they've ever broadcast, and I see no need for such information here either. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:42, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

text: If this information can't be found elsewhere on the internet, where did you get it? And I don't believe I've interfered or intruded on your work, merely questioned you about it since Wikipedia does have policies and guidelines on how things should be done. If you are not comfortable with the collaborative nature of this project, you may feel more comfortable editing elsewhere. Fandom.com (formerly Wikia.com) is very welcoming of users who want to share this level of arcana on their favorite subjects. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much is too much? 

message: The Notable calls section does not appear to define any criteria for what constitutes a "notable" call. The fact that someone posted them on YouTube is not sufficient. To be deemed notable, the calls themselves should have been the topic of some third-party commentary. Lacking this, we could call any thing he said that we particularly liked a "notable call", but that's not how we roll at Wikipedia. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging  and  who were largely responsible for adding and expanding this section to get their input on the discussion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:58, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable calls