lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Central Line (Tanzania)

message: Somebody who is a native speaker of English should take a review of my text. The sources and my native language are German, so a set of language-related mistakes should surely be discovered. Also I have not yet the proper feeling for setting links in the English-language version of Wikipedia. Please feel encouraged to correct and add to my text. -- Reinhard Dietrich (talk) 10:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I will check the page for relevant mistakes. Thank you for your edit. I will ping you since this was 10 years before and you might probably have forgot. @ Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 03:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Review request
Talk:Trump International Hotel

message: The edit summary of this edit says "This is a set index/list of buildings, not a disambig page" and the edit removes the  tag. I replaced the tag because this is a page for buildings known by the name "Trump International Hotel and Tower" and which readers may search for using the name Trump International Hotel and Tower. This page helps them disambiguate between the various buildings known by that name.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  15:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dab status

message: Article to create: Trump International Hotels Management. Source 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Article to create
Talk:Children's railway

message: I have deleted a link to a 15inch park-railway in Stuttgart. 
Children's railway operated by boy/girl-scouts, as defined in this article, were common only in east Germany. In western Germany, many events with and for children were and are held, but not to this extent, when children were tought to operate a whole railway. This seems to be really a specialty of eastern Europe.
--Peter Walt A. (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's Railway existed only in East Germany 

message: There seems to be some debate about the first Children's Railway. This site lists the 1932 date for Gorky Park, but also includes a comment at the top of the page: "The data listed below can be not actual." Elsewhere on the site, Tbilisi Georgia's railway is described as the first.
On the other hand, the Russian site says the following, thanks to google translate: "Now in Moscow itself is not the children's railway (the closest - Little Moscow - located forty kilometers from Moscow, in the village of Kratovo). But this is - now and in the 1930s children's railway in Moscow was. Moreover, it opened in 1932, that is, three years ahead of Tbilisi DSB, which in the conventional chronology of children's railway is considered as the first. And besides - the road was to the same and electrified! On the line cruised homemade trehvagonny train, who received power from the catenary. The average car electric motor was, and both head - trailed. What was designed and built this structure is now very difficult to establish, but we assume that the pioneers built it Podlipki Moscow railway station site."
So it seems Gorky park likely is the first. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 12:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Children's Railway 
Talk:Congo–Ocean Railway

message: The photo is not so big or clear to tell whether the coupler is AAR or Willison.
The date of 1932 might be a bit early for Willison couplers to be available.  AAR couplers date from the 1880s'.
A more recent and clearer photo would be desirable!    Tabletop (talk) 02:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coupler: AAR or Willison? 
Talk:Norman Armour

message: Disclosure: I am the grandson of Norman Armour. My grandfather was a life long Republican - not a Democrat as stated in the article. I have not yet found a reference to confirm this assertion. Can anybody help? I can supply further anecdotal evidence.
TheoA (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grandfather was a Republican not a Democrat as stated
Talk:Kenzō Takada

message: The French version of Wikipedia sources Kenzō Takada received the Legion of Honour in January 2016. The cited Presidential decree doesn't report the questioned name. Part of the international press dates the presentation to the 4 January 2016, while other part dates it to June 2016 by work of the French Constitutional Council. 
The related delivery document of the assignation can't be easily found. There exists a book of 102 photos dated back to 2nd June 2016. The latter seems to be the best WP:reliable source available for the delivery of the Legion of Honour, to be cited in the WP article.Philosopher81sp (talk) 05:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legion of Honour in 2016 

message: what is your source of information?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.214.66.229 (talk) 14:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Only Japonese, cf. . GabrieL (talk) 10:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  kenzo with the french nationality ??
Talk:Prince of Piedmont

message: According to , the Dukes of Savoy used the title of "Count of Piedmont" from at least 1417 until 1447, when it was elevated to a principality. However, in 1436 and 1438, Louis, Duke of Savoy, before his accession as Duke of Savoy, uses the title "Prince of Piedmont", firstborn son of "Amadeus, Duke of Savoy...Count of Piedmont...". Interesting. Choess 19:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This should be Prince of Piedmont, since Lord of Piedmont is no longer used. Even the Italian-language version of this page is :it:Principe di Piemonte . Wikimandia (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title --> Prince of Piedmont
Talk:Key clustering

message: Is key clustering exactly the same as equivalent keys? The article is not clear enough whether "clustered keys" in the presence of different plaintexts must also produce the same ciphertexts or not. -- intgr [talk] 11:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No, key clustering is very different from the issue of equivalent keys. It's an issue having to do with hash tables; namely, that if the hash of two keys are the same, then the values must basically be stored in old-fashioned lists, which causes hash table lookup times to increase. (I'll get rid of the misleading WikiProject Cryptography header and replace it with a WikiProject Computer Science one.) Duckmather (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equivalent keys vs key clustering
Talk:Omphalos (book)

message: The facsimile reprint by Ox Bow shows the title as the one presently shown, and that title has 306 cites on Google. It is also the title found on Amazon for two reprint editions. The previous title in the article, "Creation (Omphalos): An Attempt to Untie the Geological Knot" produces zero hits on Google.  It would be useful if the article includeed the generally accepted title, so that a reader might be able to purchase a copy of the book, or to find it in a library, or to find discussion of it online.Edison 19:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Not sure that it was "rescued from obscurity by Stephen Jay Gould" -- it's discussed over several pages in Martin Gardner's Fads and Fallacies: In the Name of Science... -- AnonMoos (talk) 13:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: rescued from obscurity?
Talk:Bolaños Municipality

message: Is there a location map for this article? The photo under "Location" is something else.
Rbraunwa 19:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Location map
Talk:Sammy Mandell

message: An administrator needs to move this page to Sammy Mandell, and delete this page. The correct spelling of this boxers name is Sammy Mandell, not Sammy Mandel.--Matt1978 19:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --TeaDrinker (talk) 06:32, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cornelius Clarkson Vermeule III

message: The ending is a little bit non-NPOV. For one thing, he wasn't doing anything unusual. For another, unlike Schliemann and some of the other famous archaeologists, he wasn't doing it for the money, which he did not need. I don't know him well enought to say what his intentions were but it seems to me they were basically good. What would the destiny of those artifacts have been if he did not purchase them? What do you say, folks, is Wiki for character assassination?Dave 19:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: non-NPOV ending
Talk:Battle of Zenta

message: @Qaayush529 Please do not edit a citation to make it say something not supported by the source. It is important to maintain text–source WP:INTEGRITY and Wikipedia:Verifiability. The citation from the source says: "The victory ultimately led to the 1699 Treaty of Karlowitz, which signalled the end of Ottoman dominance in Europe." not . The content in the article as been edited to reflect the source used. Please follow WP guidelines and discus on TP if you wish, thank you. Aeengath (talk) 13:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I did provided the reasoning for the edit and the current underlying problem in that statement. Oh well anyways 103.81.215.214 (talk) 15:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You did and your reasoning made sense but articles on WP cannot contain original research and the material presented needs to be directly supported by sources. Aeengath (talk) 16:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing sourced content
Talk:Gene McKinney

message: Removed the following entry from the Biography section due to no citation or reference. And, the fact that he is out of the military and would not be performing peace keeping duties, even if he was currently located in Afghanistan: 
:"He is now keeping peace in Afghanistan"
Ncohistory (talk) 18:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as he is asleep, he is keeping the peace.  When he is awake, there is potential liability for breach of that peace.  I certainly would not pay McKinney to keep the peace because that would be paying him to sleep.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.139.67.17 (talk) 12:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Afghanistan

message: When I get around to it, I'm going to cut out the cut-n-paste of what appears to be an official Army-sanctioned biography.  This may be good source material, but much of it is irrelevant and much is biased or at least blatantly promotional.
*Actually, it looks like this didn't come from the army. McKinney is an embarassment to the army now - his official bio is short and to the point - the link is on the article page. This is more likely taken from another source, but I agree, it's a bit POV. --Nobunaga24 02:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Anyone know if the bronze stars are for valor?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.249.51.26 (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards

message: This article only has a couple references and they focus on the scandal section. Need more information.--0pen$0urce (talk) 08:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing References Tag

message: Although I understand the army's syle of writing, that does not apply here. We use the Wiki Manual of Style. Under that, "army" does not require a capital unless modified by an adjective or noun functioning as an adjective ("US Army). In the same way, ranks (or positions) like "sergeant major of the army" are not set with intial caps unless they are a person's name "Sergeant Major of the Army Jones."
I know, the army does it another way, but here is another case where there is "The right way and the army way." Paul, in Saudi (talk) 11:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Capital letters
Talk:Abdullahi Sheikh Ismail

message: This is information is not sufficient enough, It should be more, try to expand article according to Wikipedia policies with proper citations, and if you allow my self I can certainly help you in expanding it.--Faizanalivarya (talk) 15:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding required
Talk:Yoshimi P-We

message: * Spelling: "Saicobab" or "Psychobaba"? --Jonathan Williams 19:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't her last name GOTO now? --Jonathan Williams 20:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Mannlicher M1895

message: I wonder if the existing image is concise, I've been adding images from my personal collection to many of the firearm articles, and think this might serve better:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v709/Vaarok/steyr95.jpg
Vaarok (talk) 10:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This sentence mingles Austrian (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austria-Hungary)  and German. Ruck-Zuck is Austrian Slang. "Landser" is a German term. The German weapon was http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gewehr_98 and not the Mannlicher  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.144.214.218 (talk) 17:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: "Ruck-zuck" was just as well used in southern Germany (at the least). However I only ever encountered it as meaning "in a blink". Also the German article makes no mention of "Ruck zurück", so I'm wondering about the authenticity of that expression. --BjKa (talk) 09:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  nicknamed the Ruck-Zu(rü)ck 
Talk:Hambly Arena

message: This article is about more than just the fire and should be moved to simply "Hambly Arena". BoojiBoy 20:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been renamed as the result of a move request.
Vegaswikian 08:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Image has been orphaned, since no valid free license exists. Suggest it be deleted. Flibirigit (talk) 02:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Oshawa Hambly Arena.jpg
Talk:Trademark argument

message: I feel the article is effective with the existing formatting. --Oreo Priest 20:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm pretty sure that the trademark argument wasn't created by Descartes as the article says here, just as Descartes merely restated the ontological argument for the existence of God - which was around since St. Anselm in the 11th century, or maybe even before.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.231.220 (talk) 19:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of the trademark argument 

message: This article has way too much content to simply subsist on WP:GENREF. It's so horrible I'm even considering creating an account. I haven't had one in years. 72.204.168.159 (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:GENREF]]
Talk:Megalopolis Expressway Trial

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: There is an article here on the fairlady Z, and all the cars in the film are right hand drive, however a picture of a left hand drive, 280z turbo is shown as "Fairlady." Stupid.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.200.41.67 (talk) 09:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Typical Wikipedia stupidity
Talk:Royal Rumble (1989)

message: Man this article is a mess. Can someone help me clean this article up please?!--Nascarking (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean this article up 

message: The additional information under the list of the Rumble entrants says that Hulk Hogan eliminated 10 Wrestlers. But according to that list above those informations, he eliminated Perfect (1), Brown (2), Savage (3), Blanchard (4), Anderson (5), Luke (6), Ware (7), the Warlord (8) and Big Boss Man (9). Those are only nine and not ten IMO. Where's the mistake here? 212.183.97.202 (talk) 18:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The mistake was in the note; checking wwe.com only lists nine eliminations as well. I've made the necessary adjustments. Thanks for the note. NiciVampireHeart 13:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hulk Hogan eliminations? 

message: FIX THE THING KillerMystery13 (talk) 20:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIX THE THING 

message: The link to “Ron Bass” should actually link to “Ron Bass (wrestler).” 207.255.91.64 (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ron Bass Link
Talk:Stilt-Man

message: I specifically clarified it wasn't an appearance of the character, but I think the fact his armor appears in the show (something that had to be specifically requested by showrunners and created by prop designers to insinuate his character exists) should be added to the in other media section. KashmirInt (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daredevil TV show
Talk:Death Adder (character)

message: Talk to wikiproject comics and see what they tell you. 96.238.36.171 (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why is the page name Death Adder? --J (t) 03:54, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: THat is the name of the article. 96.238.36.171 (talk) 03:54, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: DEath Adder I/II
Talk:Demogoblin

message: The original revision of this page, from which the present biography section takes most of its text, is a verbatim copy of the biography at http://www.spiderfan.org/characters/demogoblin.html, attributed to one Jeanne Burch.  Unless the (anonymous IP) editor's right to submit this material to Wikipedia can be established, all of this material is prima facie a copyright violation. -Stellmach 18:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Apparent copyright violation

message: 'Ultimate Demogolbin?' removed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Maple Leaf (talk • contribs) 
Well Bendis has said that Mary Jane is the Ultimate Demogoblin(Doeswhateveraspidercan666 (talk) 20:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NO speculation

message: This article is incomplete and undersourced and incomplete, with some information being unsourced. The publication history could be expanded a bit more, with citations for its information. There is a lot of information on the character's appearances in both the comics and other media that is unsourced and needs to be given proper citations for its information. This character is very interesting and I would love to see it and other articles on Spider-Man characters (and comic book characters in general) expanded to their full potential. Hopefully someone will come along and give this article the attention it needs.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation and Expansion
Talk:Doppelganger (Marvel Comics)

message: * I see a new category was added to this article.  How is Doppelganger a precognitive character?  Unless I missed something, he's not. -Seinfreak37 15:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fictional precognitive characters?

message: I notice that this page refers to Doppleganger as a "he", in any of the comics Doppleganger appeared in, was he ever reffered to with a masculine pronoun? BassxForte 19:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is a doppelganger of a male, so it is reasonable to refer to him as male. --Freak104 19:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Really, a mutant/clone/friend-of-weird-red-alien-thing is genderless in my opinion. Does it even really matter? Chickenmonger (talk) 23:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender

message: Even if the Doppelganger's return doesn't explain how it survived being eviscerated by Carnage, if it could survive that, a few bullets aren't likely to kill it, so the "possibly killing it" should be removed.  173.180.72.42 (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. You were correct to remove that, but not because of your stated reason. Statements like "possibly killing" would be classified under original research and shouldn't be in the article. Thanks for removing that. I failed to catch it before now. Spidey104 15:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carnage #1 

message: This article is missing the character's publication history. It needs to be added in order to make the article more precise.--Paleface Jack (talk) 00:20, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication History needs to be Added 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Doppelganger (Marvel Comics). (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Doppelganger (comics) →  – The title does not follow Wikipedia's naming conventions, such as that it is not the common name of the subject or it is overprecise. NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:37, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 July 2022
Talk:Mattie Franklin

message: I've changed the lead to say that Franklin is the fourth to be called Spider-Woman, instead of the third. It's kind of a grey area, since we obviously go by publication chronology rather than in-universe chronology, and both Mattie Franklin and Charlotte Witter began calling themselves Spider-Woman in the same issue. But in-universe, it seems to be implied that Witter was using the name before, so I'd say it makes sense to place her as Spider-Woman number three and Franklin as number four.--NukeofEarl (talk) 13:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The third? 

message: removed from article:
Comic Book Resources placed her as one of the superheroes Marvel wants you to forget. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 22:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Madame Web

message: It would be really effective to use a picture of Mme Web, from an issue of the latest Sensational Spiderman.
:I've now added such an image. Hopefully this one is suitable.Jayunderscorezero 11:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture 

message: Well, she's now made her debut in Ultimate Spider-Man #102.  I've added that little detail, but it's not perfect.
--Sleepysolitude 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultimate Madame Web 

message: Twice in this article I see the Gathering of the Five mentioned.  What exactly is it?  I search the Wikipedia and find one other Marvel comic book character mentioned as being part of it, but still no explanation for it.  The only other place "Gathering of the Five" is mentioned on the Wikipedia, is for five Central American presidents getting together, and I doubt it was to fight supervillians.  Dream Focus 22:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gathering of the Five mentioned twice, but what was it? 

message: Interesting to see that the character was created in 1980, as I specifically recall a Madam Web appearing with Spider-man in a Hostess ad a couple years earlier. . .76.185.59.21 (talk) 00:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier Version 

message: I checked on Dakota Johnson’s official Instagram account and it looks like she tagged it with both Sony Pictures and also Marvel Studios. Should that be noted as possible indication of Marvel Studios involvement? I mean would anyone check for themselves if they want? I’m just asking so please don’t anyone get mad at me? 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 05:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add possible Marvel Studios involvement?
Talk:Exodus (comics)

message: The real name of Exodus is kind of strange in French, Bennet du Paris could be understand in French as the idiot of Paris (benêt de Paris).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.53.50.87 (talk) 21:22, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something strange 

message: The fact that his image is that crusty John Romita Jr drawing is so wrong, he deserves something better Cordelia Van Allen (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Main Image