Talk:Glenunga International High School

message: I recently placed a point of view check flag in this article as it seems to be advertising the school by metioning new facilities at the school. Also, by mentioning student life activities avaliable, this is further advertising. Seeing as these extra-curricular activites are not run by the school, but rather persons within the school, and thus I do not believe that this can be attributed to the school. Generally taking the stance of this school being good where it cannot be proved is also biased. To counteract this issue of baseless advertising, information on the Open Day and other events should be provided on this page (merely providing a link to the school website does not, in my opinion, suffice). Remember folks, this be an open encyclopedia, and it takes trust to not have to protect against advertising abuses.--Tspshilt 12:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So fix it. michael talk 12:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed at least one of my issues by registering - it is open, you are welcome to edit but it is better done as a registered user.  I certainly won't remove the NPOV marker and will look forward to your edits - all the best -- Nigel  (Talk) 12:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tho I confess I do not see the computer network problems as being a wiki issue and would probably revert them as I have in the past - I look forward to hearing why you considered it so vital to an encyclopedia article? -- Nigel  (Talk) 12:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am indeed a student at the school, so while, to be fair, this leaves my point of view biased, This does not make it justifiable of all authors to be intentionally biasd. I have registered as it is a point in saying that flying abuse without being at least slightly traceable is also unfair (and underhanded). but, this is an open content pencyclopedia and anyone who has the internet (mostly) is able to view it, so it seems only fair to have my input in a community in which i belong.--Tspshilt 12:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I appreciate your honesty.  Declaring your point of view is great and not a barrier to editing wiki at all (we all have biases, being open about them is the issue!).  I also appreciate and admire your view on the quasi vandalism that takes place.  So for me - trying to stand back - leave it as it is for now but think about it.  Is there other information about your school that should be there and is the network bit overly long?  (& are there other things you could contribute to?) As a sideline the open source issues I sympathise with - most of what I use is open source! - take care and if you want me you know where I am -- Nigel  (Talk) 12:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree with beneaththelandslide. This school has many problems and Mr Knight has a history of poor funding decisions, such as advertising that the proceeds from a fundraiser would help fix the toilet, yet the money instead going to new LCD screens placed above several walkways that have spent most of the year inactive. Maybe this wasn't his personal decision, but the school has made many poor choices in recent years, yet this artical seems to be incredibly in favour of the school.Darkcraft 02:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of View (Neutrality) Flag: Reasoning 

message: I have many a suggestion for this page, but for which I do not have exact information, or am rather not willing to add, as i have already flodded this page with edits, mainly as a cause of rethinking what to write.
1. Disclose staff numbers too, as teachers do make a difference. (edit: Faculty may also refer to staff number, my mistake, tspshilt).
2. School opening hours, for enquiries and access times.
3. Transport to the school.
4. Other schools in the area, because this is not an advertising service.
--Tspshilt 09:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 5. Structural layout of the school? I'm a year 12 at the school so I may be of help Sensei baka 02:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

text: For staff numbers, I'd have to consult a friend who knows how many there are. School opening hours are quite easy as well, transport to the school is also a breeze. There are also buses which depart the school if it counts? And other schools, can they include just high schools or also include primary schools? AshesToAshton (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Please add Leanne Choo to the Notable alumni and add that she has represented Australia at the 2010 Commonwealth Games in badminton and made the quarterfinals in Women's Doubles. She is also considered the most successful junior athlete in Australia in badminton by winning all 3 national tittles at the age of 14. She also became the No 1 ranked in Australia at the age of 16years old.
http://www.badminton.org.au/index.php?id=240
Choostar (talk) 13:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Question:Is there a source that states that she went to the school? Jnorton7558 (talk) 00:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Choostar, 19 July 2011 

message: I think we need to further discuss the article's neutrality. Personally I do not see any problems with the article, as the new improvements seem to me like they should be listed in the school's history. I think the best solution here is just to remove the whole section on the recent changes so the section ends at "... it is suffering similar space issues to its predecessor." I will go about this change in a couple weeks if there are no objections. Ravens freak0624 (talk) 22:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality (Again)

message: GIHS changes frequently, especially in regards to school branding, but also in relation to other aspects described in this article. For instance, the logo depicted in the article has recently (15 Feb 2023) been replaced. There is information in the article which should preferably be prefixed with the year the information was accurate in, because it is information that may become outdated quickly. Although I will fix these issues, I suppose this is something that should be kept in mind for future edits as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvop (talk • contribs) 07:46, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information