lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shoreline, Washington

message: Do we know that the shore-to-shore, line-to-line story is untrue? According to the article, it was applied to the 1944 school district, not the city that was eventually incorporated. Maybe the school district included LFP. Iglew (talk) 17:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From the 3rd para. of History:
"After the incorporation of Lake Forest Park in 1961,... Fifty-one years later, on August 31, 1995," -- 1995-1961=34, not 51. Either the arithmetic is bad or one or both of the dates is wrong. 206.180.156.58 (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad arithmetic or wrong dates 

message: From the Geography section: "The city of Shoreline also contains a gated community, The Highlands, which manages its own utilities separately from Shoreline as it feels it is above sharing." I think perhaps this should be changed to something a little less snarky.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.226.92 (talk) 04:00, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not exactly neutral POV 

message: 1. I feel that some of the information that is in history section such as how "shoreline" came to be needs a citation.
2. "After the incorporation of Lake Forest Park in 1961, the remainder of the Shoreline School District remained an unincorporated portion of King County. Fifty-one years after it had been named, on August 31, 1995 Shoreline was officially incorporated as a code city and adopted the council-manager form of government. " this line is unclear because I am not sure if it is 51 years before 1961 or from 1961 to 1995 which would make the math wrong?
19:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: @Spenzer2 💬 2601:4A:C800:9F20:8CBC:159F:F9DE:6652 (talk) 11:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nitpicking
Talk:Tukwila, Washington

message: Pronuciation is tuck-WILL-a, not tuh-KWILL-a? kwami (talk) 05:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently so: see http://www.stevensauke.com/say/northwest.html — Myasuda (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: There are a number of photos of some Tukwila landmarks at Commons, but an article like this really needs at least one photo, preferably several, that give some sense of what the town looks like. The skyline, the cityscape, the main drag, that sort of thing. There are other city articles in the Seattle area that also need these sort of photos added. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: Is this meaningful? Is there a good way to classify it?Everett3 (talk) 06:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neighborhood income levels 

message: Vibrant personalities? Marital sex euphemisms?Everett3 (talk) 06:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture section
Talk:Contact hitter

message: Why is the original research tag on this page? Eomund (talk) 07:56, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing on the page is referenced.  They are all claims that I doubt had sources that can back them up. — X96lee15 (talk) 14:12, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research?
Talk:Battle of Manado

message: I wonder if the guerrilla war should be split off into its own article. It is interesting, but feels a little out of place coming after a section called 'Aftermath'. Srnec (talk) 02:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are additional references that can help me expand the section, I'd be more than happy to split it up. Samuel Pattinasarane 02:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guerrilla war
Talk:Battle of Balikpapan (1942)

message: Hi, Mike Diehl here. What was your reason for reverting the previous edit and flagging vandalism? The specific edit that I made added a reference, and removed language that was ambiguous, subjective, and potentially misleading, replacing that language with information that was documents, quantitatively precise, and objective. I do not see the merit in preferring "expended all torpedoes" over "expended forty torpedoes." "All" is vague and marginally informative. "Forty" is accurate and conveys BETTER encyclopedic information. There were 4 Clemson class DDs. Each carried ten torps. They fired them all. Forty is more informative than "all." Likewise, I replaced your word "few hits" with 5-7 hits. Few is imprecise, uninformative, and subjective. Literally, few would convey, grammatically, "approximately three." In a relative sense, few means "not many compared to the total." But you would not use the word "few" if, for example, 1000 torpedoes had been expended and 120 hits obtained, do you see what I mean? 5-7 is an accurate estimate based on Pope's after-action report, and on the IJN tactical record of movement of the sunk IJN patrol craft and one of the IJN transports. Pope reports hits by Parrot (1 hit at 0305 hours), two hits by Pope at 0310, one by Parrott at 0310, and two at 0319. Given that this article already states that four transports were sunk by a combination of torpedoes and gunfire, and one pc by torpedoes, the logical best estimate minimum is 5 hits. If we take Pope's observations as accurate, there were six torpedo hits. I do not see the merit in preferring language that is obscure, subjective, and potentially misleading ("few hits were obtained") over language that is quantitative and supported by both Japanese and USN sources ("five or six hits were obtained"). Mike Diehl (talk) 15:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  @ Binksternet 
Talk:Hempfield Area High School

message: The band section is starting to get awful trivia-heavy. I will concede that major national honours, like marching in the Tournament of Roses Parade, belong in the article. I disagree that every local-level minor parade and award needs mentioned. Further, listing the 2006–7 band membership and instrument counts is getting way outside the realm of the encyclopedic. Accordingly, I delete it as it gets posted. Does anybody have a reason why that info should stand in the article? —C.Fred (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, there's way too much trivia here! Does the seating capacities and library holdings really add to our understanding of the school? We should probably work this over to include the sections recommended by WikiProject Schools:
*History
*Campus
*Students
*Faculty
*Extracurricular Activities
*Curriculum
*Notable Alumni
*References
*External Links
– Paschmitts 14:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much non-encyclopedic info in the band section? 

message: While I think the listing of head football coaches and their records is reasonable, the last three seasons of football results is excessive for a high school article. Accordingly, I've deleted them. —C.Fred (talk) 00:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports schedules
Talk:North American Women's Baseball League

message: I've deleted the  tag, as I don't believe the NAWBL is ever going to have "references...in reliable third-party publications" (other than occasional mentions in the local press, which are pointed to for a while at www.nawbl.org).  --Spike-from-NH (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This archived news page lists various articles in the Boston Globe, Salem News and Nashua Telegraph.  It would be good to incorporate their information into the article... Krubo (talk) 17:56, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary sources
Talk:Wedding March (Mendelssohn)

message: The information at this page conflicts with the information from the article about Felix Mendelssohn. 
In that article we read: "Mendelssohn's Wedding March from A Midsummer Night's Dream was first played at the wedding of Queen Victoria's daughter, The Princess Victoria, The Princess Royal, to Crown Prince Frederick of Prussia in 1856 and it is still popular today". 
At this page, however, we read: "The first time it was used at a wedding was when Dorothy Carew wed Tom Daniel at St Peter’s Church, Tiverton, UK, on 2 June 1847. However it did not become popular at weddings until it was selected by Victoria, The Princess Royal for her marriage to the Crown Prince of Prussia on January 25, 1858". 
Thus, we can see two conflicts. The first one is that there is uncertainty about the event when this march was first played. The second one is in the dates of wedding of Victoria and Frederick (1856 and 1858).
So I propose to review the facts mentioned in both articles and correct the mistakes which existence is obviously seen from above.
Sagalovichm 10:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: Liszt transcribed the piece for piano, Horowitz arranged it and made a few changes (correct me if I'm wrong).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.119.218.227 (talk) 04:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Misinformation???

message: An audio sample of at least the opening of this piece would certainly be a useful addition. T-bonham (talk) 05:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Audio sample needed
Talk:Battle of Palembang

message: The external link http://fletchers.esmartdesign.com/dutcheastindies/palembang.html shows a photo of what are purported to be bamboo stakes pointed skyward as a defense against paratroops. Any confirmation of this? I haven't read about this tactic anywhere else, and the photo is not discussed in the text. To me, it looks like Rommelspargel from two years later in France. Binksternet (talk) 08:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bamboo stakes vs. paratroops
Talk:Pittsburgh Pirates Ballparks

message: This article seems to be a list of Pittsburgh Pirates ballparks, but it seems to be in conflict with some of the articles shown as links, and with the linking among the articles. I don't know enough to figure out what should be changed, or whether this article should be an orphan needing links, or maybe it should be nominated for deletion. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicts with linked articles
Talk:Oamaru

message: The region of Otago is one of New Zealand's 16 regions.  North Otago is not an official region.  Oamaru is part of Otago.  That we call this part of Otago, logically, 'north Otago', is obvious, but there is no North Otago local council nor is there a regional council for North Otago.  The article should reflect what really exists, the very real and governable Otago region.  I am reverting changes made which completely removed Otago from the equation. Enzedbrit 10:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Otago
Talk:Brandon Morrow

message: Brandon Morrow currently leads the league for SP's with SO/9 Innings Pitched (by a wide margin no less) and is known for overpowering batters. Any pitcher having 10+ SO's in a game is fairly significant; moreso when they can duplicate the effort. I believe it contributes to his reputation and to general awareness of exceptional baseball performance to record these efforts here. That being said, good luck to the person doing it for Randy Johnson. 72.76.243.61 (talk) 22:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of games where the pitcher has double-digit strikeout efforts 
Talk:North Allegheny Intermediate High School

message: I'd really like to see some references for this section because it appears to be almost entirely made up. --Slotaa 14:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top American School 

message: The recently added obituary was full of POV and gossip. I tried to trim it down, but it was apparent that it does not belong here. --Superburgh 07:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obituary
Talk:Wandsworth Common

message: Photo request tag added. JoshHolloway 11:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A photo was added in May 2008.  Please consider removing or refining the  template when a picture has been added to an article! :-) Tim Pierce (talk) 11:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Photo
Talk:Battle of Sunda Strait

message: Thank you to whoever deleted "decisive" from the description, "Japanese victory". The tag "decisive" is over-used, as very few actions decide anything. I suppose this action could qualify as "major" or maybe even "complete", if someone objects to the deletion, but it didn't really decide anything that wasn't already decided the day before in the Java Sea. Xyl 54 09:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Decisive Victory?

message: You guys do know that by any definition the HNLMS Evertsen should be included in the battle rollcall. Just because they cowardly tried to flee doesn't make them any less part of the battle. LOL Henryjones000 (talk) 23:51, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally outnumbered and outgunned, a retreat/evasion to save the ship and the lives of the crew is not 'cowardly.'  Shame on you. HammerFilmFan (talk) 22:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: HNLMS Evertsen was part of Battle
Talk:Aeolian Building (42nd Street)

message: The concert hall )other wise known as Aeolian Hall) in the Aeolian building was not on the third floor as stated in the article but on the first and second floors. I know this for a fact as I have seen the architect's plans. There was only a recording studio on the third floor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.51.63 (talk) 00:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Vzeebjtf (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  concert hall 

message: The pianist Harold Bauer also performed and recorded in the Aeolian Building. He gives a short account of this and the pianola in this autobiography "His book". 136.223.48.2 (talk) 15:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harold Bauer
Talk:West Croydon station

message: It seems a bit odd putting the terminus label in "following station" with the next station along the line as "preceding". It is, of course, true in some sense; but would it not be more logical to swap these around, as they seem to be for most other termini (both ends of the brighton line:  Victoria or  Brighton for example)? In other words make it look like this:
Which is like saying (for example) "London Overground services leave here for Norwood Junction on their way to Dalston Junction" rather than that "London Overground services from Dalston Junction terminate here having just passed through Norwood Junction".
It seems more natural to me but I didn't change it in case there is a convention that I'm missing.
Bagunceiro (talk) 12:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminus
Talk:Binghamton Triplets

message: Why does this article have a list of "Notable alumni" (same heading used twice which is a MOS failure), and "Triplet players of note" ? Spike 'em (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  dual listing 
Talk:Cloyd Boyer

message: sorry that I'm not in a good position to fix this myself, but the description of family is either awkwardly written or wrong.  The brother Clete Boyer is Cletis Boyer. The section looks like they are two different people, both major leaguers (along with brother Ken). But Clete is Cletis, and the Clete page makes that clear. Danchall (talk) 02:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Clete = Cletis
Talk:Kingdom of Gorkha and Ten Limbu Kingdoms' Treaty of 1774

message: "a very short article with no or little content"-- It's   an overly long and disorganized article that needs context, wikifying, and sources. It's unfamiliar history to some of us and I dont want to pre-judge it.
It would help if people doing speedies would use reasons that has somerelation to the article. DGG 11:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Heads (British band)

message: A user asked me for evidence that this band is notable:
*The band have commercially released seven albums on CD and/or vinyl. All are self-released or on small labels, but they are available from mainstream outlets in at least three different countries (see   ). CD Wow, in particular, does not sell every available CD, it only appears to stock mainstream releases or those likely to sell well (e.g. it does not stock every available ABBA CD ).
*The band appear to be well known. They are listed on All Music Guide () and have been praised by Julian Cope on his Head Heritage website ().
:*Thanks for doing that research. I've listed the matter at AfD, closure -> we can all move on. Deizio talk 11:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What do you make of this evidence of a band that predates The Heads, called ... "The Heads"? - Bytes breaking to bits (talk) 03:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This isn't the first "The Heads"

message: It'd be nice if someone described a little bit their musical genre. So far, there was added classification to "stoner rock" in the end of the article, but naturally it got to be removed as no such statements nor references has been made nowhere. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:Elizabeth Quay railway station

message: Hi - the photos I took of the station under construction are now over two years old, and I see from the newmetrorail website that the canopy has been erected. Anyone (e.g. Shinjiman, M Johnson) fancy taking some new photos of the station? Cheers - Gobeirne 19:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just uploaded a photo of the Esplanade Station, the station is nearly complete and still got the fences around it. Shinjiman ⇔ ♨ 05:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New photos anyone?

message: The section of track between Esplanade and Perth stations is considered part of both the Mandurah and Joondalup lines; therefore, Esplanade is part of both lines. This section should be updated to reflect that. Brian Jason Drake 08:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platforms 
Talk:Marathon (2005 film)

message: It shouldn't say his mother never gives up on him, as she does (albeit breifly) when they go to the zoo when he is a small child.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eujin16 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following request to move a page has been added to Wikipedia:Requested moves as an uncontroversial move, but this has been contested by one or more people. Any discussion on the issue should continue here. If a full request is not lodged within five days of this request being contested, the request will be removed from WP:RM.  —Dekimasu (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested move request
Talk:Scwʼexmx Tribal Council

message: how do i retreive a list of names on the nicomen indian band (membership) as it is needed to draw -up a will,thank-you ,all my relations ,vera massicotte  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.71.150.118 (talk) 19:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  names of memberships-nicomen indian band
Talk:Murdoch Park 'n' Ride

message: This recent edit changed the article text and infobox from "Park 'n' Ride" to "Park & Ride". I make no assertions about which is correct, but the article title and text should match. If the new text is correct, the article ought be renamed as well. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:12, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  article and station name
Talk:Cannington railway station

message: It would be great to see a picture of the old weatherboard Cannington Station with the old Steam loco shead that was all demolished when the new station was built further towards Perth.
I remember the old station having a ticket booth, Station Masters office, a switching room, a bike room, rest rooms, and a first and second class lounge all with fireplaces. It was located between Station Street and Crawford Rd, and on the Railway Pde side there were two old weatherboard houses for the Station Master and Steam loco driver.
Can only just remember going to the station with my nanna to get the 8.30am steam train to Perth (it was the first train in the morning and began from Cannington).
The old station was identical to the one remaining at Claremont Station today.
Can someone dig up an old photo or two? petedavo 07:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Perth Central Area Transit

message: The central theme of the article is clearly about the Central Area Transit (CAT) services. These started in the Perth CBD but have now been replicated in Fremantle and Joondalup, and similar services introduced elsewhere. The article can do with a cleanup to focus on the actual CAT services, and as an aside also mention the non-CAT services introduced elsewhere. Betterkeks (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Restructured to separate CAT from non-CAT. Betterkeks (talk) 06:14, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Central Theme of Article

message: The name of this article is a bit confusing as to me, it implies that it only covers the CBD CAT services (red, blue, yellow) and not the Fremantle and Joondalup services and Rockingham RCCTS (or whatever it is.) Any suggestions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.152.59.206 (talk) 09:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name 

message: What about it? Shouldn't it be seen in the same light as RCCTS?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.177.218.83 (talk) 03:12, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Subiaco Shuttle

message: Why not renaming the article as "Transperth CAT"? The official web page uses that title. Plus, it would remove the ambiguity of a "Perth CAT" article having a "Perth CAT" among its sections, due to the fact that the article also covers Freemantle and Joondalup CAT services. -- 109.119.249.165 (talk) 07:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks likely the title part "Perth" was referring to the greater Perth area, or Metropolitan Perth area, and not limiting only to the Perth CBD area. Shinjiman ⇔ ♨ 02:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Somitomere

message: The article doesn't mention that the concept or existence of somitomeres is debated. See for example: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895339/
E.g. 
  the concept of a somitomere was ill-defined, ambiguous, and latent (only incompletely segmented and nonepithelialized)
Cmungall (talk) 20:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:Graeme Harper

message: I was gonna translate this to Norwegian and I noticed that a lot of the information is sourced from a book by Adrian Rigelsford. It seems like he shouldn't be considered a reliabe source. I was wondering if  the cites should be replaced with another and more reliable source. Davhorn (talk) 21:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think in this case it can be taken as reliable for two reasons. 1) The book was basically a long interview with Harper, so the source was Harper rather than Rigelsford's own research, and 2) Harper has collaborated on another book with Rigelsford since then (his one about the new series, published last year), so can't have been too unhappy with anything Rigelsford did. Angmering (talk) 20:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: The infobox says he was born in St Albans. The first section says he was born in London. They can't both be right! Unless there's a source than can definitively establish which is right, both will have to re removed The- (talk) 23:55, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace
Talk:32-bit Disk Access

message: This article should be called Windows' 32-bit disk access and not 32-bit disk access. Its name is misleading because some bios have their 32 bit bus transfer function named like this. 
Please read here: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/pc-hardware-faq/enhanced-IDE/part1/ Q. 8.9 193.219.93.218 11:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shmap'n Shmazz

message: Not that it's super important, but I thought it was Shmap'n Shmazz, not, Schmap'n Schmazz. The album title in the article title contradicts the album title elsewhere in the article...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levio Sah (talk • contribs) 05:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: By George, you're right! Let's fix this at once! The Sound and the Fury (talk) 22:59, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not really sure why it's listed under this title at all.  It's clearly not the actual name of the album. —Torc. (Talk.) 00:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schmap'n vs. Shmap'n.