lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SunTour

message: "They are known for making very durable components at a low cost"
I've removed this since, frankly, it's just an opinion. I encourage people to repost it if they can prove it.
This entire entry is chock full of opinion words. One of the more egregious...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.15.156 (talk) 08:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow, this is an opinionated statement 

message: "SunTour was the first component maker to introduced indexed shifting (ahead of Shimano)"
Shimano introduced Positron, a low-end index shifting system, in 1977 or so. SunTour may have had something earlier, but I can't recall it (or easily find mention of it). Could change above to say "...aimed at mid-range and high-end bicycles" if that's accurate. Is it? Jim Feeley (talk) 22:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a little late with a reply, but I'd point out that Sturmey Archer shifters were also indexed, well before the '70s. --Keithonearth (talk) 03:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this statement true? 

message: Is anyone interested in placing this in the context of the bicycle component industry? While Shimano is mentioned in this article, it seems like this should be embedded in a series about different manufacturers? Tilapidated (talk) 19:08, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  larger context?

message: A contemporary Consumer Reports test reported that "SunTour was far and away the easiest to shift and the most certain of arriving at the right sprocket."
66.194.117.58 (talk) 16:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  It would be great to have a citation here
Talk:Soviet census

message: I had the 1920 All-Russian census in the list because it was conducted by the new Bolshevik regime, though its coverage was limited by the civil war.  It also appears as a census on the .RU Wiki, while in fact the 1923 urban census does not.  I think it's valid to include both on this list,  or neither, since (a) the first complete census was in 1926, and (b) there is no information (there are no articles) about most of these censuses yet, at least in the English-language pages.  When I get some time, I will contribute to filling out some of the information about census content and methods.  Please take a look here: 
:ru:Перепись населения
--Mack2 00:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Mack!  Thanks for your interest.  However, please remember this is a disambiguation page.  "Soviet Census" may refer to any Census conducted in the former Soviet Union.  The 1920 Census was conducted before the Soviet Union was established, hence you cannot refer to it as "Soviet" in the same way as you are referring to other Censuses on this page (although, of course, it was conducted in Soviet Russia).  Unless you can show that the 1920 Census is consistently referred to as "Soviet Census" in English language academic works, I suggest you remove it from this disambiguation page.  Meanwhile, I copied that entry to Russian Census (which is another disambiguation page).  Of course, there should be a dedicated article about that Census; I removed the entry only because it does not fit the disambiguation scheme.  The 1923 Census, while incomplete, can still be called "Soviet Census".  I will welcome your feedback.  Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I can live with that. Thanks for your response and explanation.  I mainly would like (somebody) to actually write an article on the 1920 and the 1923 censuses.  I've never seen them used, though I have seen all the "comprehensive" censuses in use from 1897 to 2002, and I've used pretty much all of them except 1937 (which only was published in the 1990's) for one purpose or another.Mack2 20:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome.  I wish I could be that "somebody", but while I can show you a bunch of references to both 1920 and 1923 Censuses, I do not have sufficient information even for a decent stub.  I'll keep this in mind, though, and will be on the lookout for anything interesting.  Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What's a Census
Talk:David Lanz

message: Digging in the bio at the cited web page leads me to the album that he was nominated for, but no clear indication of what award he was nominated for. Since there are a lot of categories at the Grammies, I think it would help establish his notability if we could say, definitely, what category he was nominated in. —C.Fred (talk) 00:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammy nomination?

message: Could some one contribute a discography section? :-) -- Equinoxe 23:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: The intro says 13 albums. Discography shows several more. What gives? Pianette7 13:58, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many albums? 
Talk:Lord Forbes

message: ODNB says "Forbes, who had been raised to the peerage as a lord of parliament by 1 July 1445, when he appears as Lord Forbes."
Cokayne says "between Oct. 1444 and July 1445"; earlier sources claim before 12 July 1442, but Cokayne asserts that this arises from a misreading of the document, which says 1447. None of this affects the precedence.  Septentrionalis 00:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

message: An odd thing I've just noticed - James Forbes, 17th Lord Forbes is 17th in the Dictionary of National Biography but 18th in the newer ODNB.
The ODNB agrees with us that the 4th is d. 1491, but our 17th is their 18th and our 18th is their 19th. Any idea where the discrepancy has come from? Andrew Gray (talk) 19:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counting
Talk:Leaf (disambiguation)

message: Disambiguation pages have an encyclopaedic value as well as a directional use. Please do not remove useful information. The information I have restored does no harm and may do some good. Further, they are all correct uses of the word. BlueValour 00:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful information 

message: It appears that there is a tendency to trivialize the meaning of a leaf as it pertains to a book, and is used, inter alia, in publishing. --Ludvikus 04:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaves of a book 

message: A User seems to believe as follows:
   restored book to correct heading; also only 1 blue link per item in DMB pages
But I do not believe this is a valid or legitimate Wikipedia, or other, rule.
Yours truly, --Ludvikus 04:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links Per Item
Talk:Scouting in Rathfarnham

message: Remember that you can't ever copy and paste content from article to article. When someone submits content, there's a little notice at the bottom that reads, "You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL." The terms of that licensing agreement include a clause that effectively says the content is free to use and modify, but you must present a history of past contributors. By copying and pasting content, you effectively destroy that history.
As a result, everyone knew that you didn't mean to violate copyright. But, reverting their edits, without putting enough effort into finding out why your redirects were reverted, is sure to grate on the nerves of others. What you need to do now is merge the histories of the articles you're trying to move to the new location. This will require the work of an admin. Contact one, and carefully explain which article(s) the original content was from, where you want the content to be placed, and I'm sure he or she would be happy to do it. — Rebelguys2 talk 00:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Careful, everyone
Talk:The Gamits

message: I beleive that this page should not be deleted because it is providing valid information about a proffesional Band. I see no reason for this article to be deleted.
*Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country,[1] reported in notable and verifiable sources. 
-The Gamits Have Travled to Japan On Tour 
*Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable). 
-The Gamits are published by Suburban Home Records who have a consideralble roster of preformers
Sigh Why is this not in the article? Read the article, and tell me if the content of it alone passes WP:MUSIC. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 17:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: I've removed the entire history section.  It was almost a word for word duplicate of the bands official website .  Their website contains a copyright notice at the bottom of the page. Sperril (talk) 18:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing History section as copyright violation 

message: I'm not seeing the WP:MUSIC met here. I removed one source while editing but it was a basic discog-type aggregated stats page on the band. It had nothing to do with the claim it was supposedly supporting. Anybody have any way to improve this article to notability? I can't find much online about these guys besides mentions in local news articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeletor3000 (talk • contribs) 06:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability template added
Talk:Graphics address remapping table

message: as mentioned in the title, does Classic Mac OS or Mac OS X support GART on the PowerPC based Macs with AGP-Interface?Thanks for an Answer, Erik 2003:ED:F7FF:1A8D:30F7:B7B5:D443:F6A (talk) 19:09, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  does classic MacOS or Mac OS X support GART on PowerPC Macs with AGP-Interface?
Talk:Sartell, Minnesota

message: I inserted (but editor commented out) the Infobox City for the editors of this page to fill out.  When finished filling it out, simply remove the  tags at the beginning and end of the infobox fields.  Keep in mind not all the fields need to be filled out —most are optional. MJCdetroit 18:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks for the suggestion.--Daveswagon 20:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox city 

message: For those who plan on editing and expanding this article, please follow the Template for a U.S. City. Thanks!--Daveswagon 09:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template for a U.S. City
Talk:Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina

message: I have never heard anyone express doubt that Locke played a role in drafting the Fundamental Constitutions.  Is there a reference for this?  In the meantime, I will change the wording of the article to state that Locke was ONE of the major authors (though probably not the sole author).  This is the opinion of Robert Weir, in Colonial South Carolina: A History-- one of the standard authorities on early South Carolina.  Drfryer 00:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going by memory here, but I seem to recall Richard Ashcraft saying in Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government that the "Constitutions" probably bare the same relation to Locke as the "Letter from a Person of Quality, to His Friend in the Country," with Shaftesbury's being the primary influence.  Ashcraft was a major Locke scholar and meticulous historian, so I'm inclined to agree with him on this one.  It's possible that Locke did play a larger role -- his Two Tracts sound an awful lot like Hobbes, who wouldn't see the irony in asking the serfs to consent to their serfdom -- but I think that we have to treat his responsibility as an object of dispute. RJC Talk 17:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I think the link to the aristocratic title proposed in the constitution, namely 'Cassique' should lead to this article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassique , which explains the appropriation of the term and also includes references to the original term and the position held by indigenous peoples within their own tribes. Dejacque (talk) 14:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cazique reference and link
Talk:Emme (river)

message: Shouldn't we move the article to Emme (river) as other disambiguated pages? Matteo 15:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the history I just noticed that the article was named Emme (river) and moved to Emme River but there is nothing in the talk page... Matteo 15:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Suburban Legends

message: Removed the information about the date of recording and release of "Dance Like Nobody Is Watching", as well cleaned up grammar, readability, and the way people were referenced, such as "a trombone player named Luis Beza" changed to "trombone player Luis Beza". I also clarified the odd switching of roles by Vince Walker. --The reverend 01:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This page could use more grammar and sentence structure cleanup, it gets hard to read at times. I'm not about to spend the time to do that though :P 173.59.83.198 (talk) 17:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up
Talk:Pax Warrior

message: I must respectfully disagree with your decision to propose the deletion of the Pax warrior article. I do so because I disagree with you labeling it as non-notable. I feel IMHO that it is notable enough to warrant its own page. I say this because the reason I started this article in the first place was that I noticed it in TIME Magazine (8/14/06, pg 20), a highly circulated news magazine. However this is not reason enough, so to further my argument I quote the article in which it states that this program is "incorporated into thousands of curriculums in Canada, Britain, South Africa, and will hit the U.S. this fall." So those students who take the curriculum and the teachers that teach the curriculum all know about Pax warrior. I also would direct you to the PeaceMaker (game) (which is similar to Pax warrior) page, which is very similar to the Pax warrior page and has not been deleted. In closing I would remind you that I am still a bit new to Wikipedia and if this makes no sense to you, then you may ignore it. I will however be reposting this post on the Pax warrior discussion page.Cpuwhiz11 01:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of [[Pax warrior]]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pax warrior

message: I must respectfully disagree with your decision to propose the deletion of the Pax warrior article. I do so because I disagree with you labeling it as non-notable. I feel IMHO that it is notable enough to warrant its own page. I say this because the reason I started this article in the first place was that I noticed it in TIME Magazine (8/14/06, pg 20), a highly circulated news magazine. However this is not reason enough, so to further my argument I quote the article in which it states that this program is "incorporated into thousands of curriculums in Canada, Britain, South Africa, and will hit the U.S. this fall." So those students who take the curriculum and the teachers that teach the curriculum all know about Pax warrior. I also would direct you to the PeaceMaker (game) (which is similar to Pax warrior) page, which is very similar to the Pax warrior page and has not been deleted. In closing I would remind you that I am still a bit new to Wikipedia and if this makes no sense to you, then you may ignore it. I will however be reposting this post on the Pax warrior discussion page.Cpuwhiz11 01:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of [[Pax warrior]]
Talk:Résistance internationaliste

message: As the user noted while changing the word "terrorist" to "militant", one "cannot terrorize inanimate objects". However, the August carbombing was not an attack on the car, per se, but an obvious action against the car owner, Montreuil, himself. Whether the intention was or was not to kill Montreuil, the purpose was to terrorize him. Escheffel 22:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorist vs. militant
Talk:Simon I de Montfort

message: Does this person link to either of those people listed at Simon de Montfort, and ought this person be added to that disambiguation page? Agent 86 01:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The August 2015 version of this article had a link in the Box stating that his Noble Family is the House of Montfort. That is not correct. 
There are many Montforts (Montfoorts) in England, Northern France, out to Flanders and Holland. The House of Montfort is the Breton ducal family that eventually married into the French crown; in turn, that ducal family is a cadet line of the House of Dreux, also liased to the French crown at an earlier date. Simon I de Montfort is likely in a separate Montfort family, the House of Montfort-d'Aumary which is unlikely to be linked to the Breton ducal Montforts. For the moment I have deleted the Noble House line and attribution and will restore it after some research to place the correct House or family name there. Any help appreciated.71.167.63.223 (talk) 23:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: House of Montfort-d'Aumary

message: You have Simon I de Montfort's daughter Bertrade as born about 1059 on this page and about 1070 on her page.  Which is the more accurate date? 
Beverly Patterson 24.183.219.220 02:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that, too.  I would guess, judging from her husbands' ages (especially Philip Capet's), and the date of her daughter's birth, that the later birthdate is more likely correct.  Don't quote me, though. Cheers, Lindsay 15:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bertrade de Montfort  

message: I have again deleted the supposed Chinese connection.  Verifiability requires more than just a web site with a wild theory, but is aimed at published scholarly consensus, and this clearly does not represent such a consensus, but rather an (as far as I can tell) unpublished pet theory.  Perhaps you can provide some details on what exactly the cited article has to say about this - I admit I can't read it, but between the original and your summary, I see nothing but "name's the same" speculation. On what basis is the 'Nisiduling Simengpan' in the Chinese source identifiable with Simon de Montfort?  I don't think he can even be shown ever to have gone to Byzantium, let alone to be a messageboy for a rebel brother-in-law of an Emperor. Simon died before the First Crusade, which first established a pattern of flow of French nobles in that direction. The name Simon, in the form of Simeon, was reasonably common in the Empire, and a search would probably show a score of named candidates. So again, did the author have any basis other than the apparent similarity between the given names of the Byzantine envoy and the French noble? Otherwise this is still unverified. Agricolae (talk) 19:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese section
Talk:Theopompus

message: I propose to merge Marvels (Theopompus) into Theopompus. Marvels is one-line stub, and that one line is already present at Theopompus#History of Philip II. There seems to be no need for a standalone article. Lennart97 (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense.  Reading his article in DGRBM, it seems that there could be more to say about this topic, but unless it's more substantial it doesn't seem to need a stand-alone article.  If a sufficient level of detail is ever provided, a separate article can be re-created from the redirect.  P Aculeius (talk) 09:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: — Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 23:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Ancient Greece
Talk:2006 Ontario municipal elections

message: I note that some users have tried to insert links or ads about their favorite candidates (or themselves). I'm a wikipedia newbie, but I'm pretty sure this is something you're not supposed to do. NDP Johnny 01:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fine with it myself. I've added all the links I possibly could for the Ottawa article. It discourages people from creating articles on Non notable candidates. -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Links to candidate’s websites provide additional information regarding this topic and should be included in a manner that does not detract from the listing. i.e. link to name only - earthartist 01:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, of course. Elections are notable. -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The question is how much detail is relevant. // habj 10:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Elections are very relevant. I don't see your point. -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dudley Le Souef

message: What relationship to the Le Souef at Perth Zoo, does anyone know? SatuSuro 01:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comment
Talk:Nearchus

message: I removed these:  "Nearch, Neärchus or Neärch". They aren't used in English. The real alternative is Nearchos, which I will insert. Andrew Dalby 18:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative spellings 
Talk:Martin Luther King High School (Philadelphia)

message: Okay, either this page needs some serious editing and revamping, or it should be taken down. 
Oops, didn't read the context well enough. I think I made a mistake. Is Thier a name? If it is, then sorry. I am not going to change it because I don't know what Thier Jroct is, so I am gonna leave it alone.PhorkPhace 03:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Mazda B engine

message: I have recently purchased a 1987 Japan model Familia GT Turbo Cabriolet.  
Strangely enough, it has a 1.5 litre turbo engine, which does not seem to be listed here. 
The closest thing here to our engine would seem to be the b6t turbo engine. 
As far as I know it is a 16v engine, but as I said, it is not listed here.  
Any information that could be given about this motor would be very handy indeed.
* You're thinking of the E5T, which is a SOHC 8v (not 16v) chain-driven engine. I've provided all of the relevant info here. Decypher 05:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I removed the Infini trim line from the b6t section, as the Familia Infini never had a b6t engine.  It was equipped with a BP-ZE from factory.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.78.3 (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the Familia Infini 

message: I have a US '94 Protege.  The BP engine used in this model is a 1.8L SOHC, not DOHC.  I can plainly see the 'BP' stamped on the block, and the Haynes manual also lists it by VIN as a BP engine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.197.84.88 (talk) 02:51, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine info for sixth gen isn't correct
Talk:Breaking Kayfabe

message: Does this have anything to do with pro wrestling? Like is he a fan or anything?
: It is connected to the wrestling meaning, yes, but I don't know if he's specifically a fan or just liked the sound and meaning of the word. Bearcat 01:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled