Talk:List of European Commissioners by nationality

message: The format I used was basically along these lines;
Commissioner	Portfolio            	Commission                                                                  	Party
Name        	Position A/Position B	Commission 1 with post A/Commission 2 with post B & Commission 3 with post B	Party
With refs for any dates outside the commission term.
This was to avoid having a list of repeated names spread across lists, insted having all the details of a commissioner in one line which I think works even if it is a bit complex in some respects. But if someone has a better idea could it please be applied to all insted just one list to avoid making it even more confusing. -JLogan 16:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: Okay, is it Luxembourger, Luxembourgish or Luxembourgian? I've seen all three on wikipedia so can someone find some source of authority on it please? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JLogan (talk • contribs) 19:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Oxford Dictionary of English (Second Edition, 2003) says Luxembourger. Q300r bc2 (talk) 22:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I added that first comment, the WikiProject for Luxembourg has decided to make all references on Wikipedia "Luxembourgian". So you'll have to take it up with them now.- J Logan t: 20:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luxembourg 

message: I stumbled upon this page and am highly surprised about two things:
#what on earth do the colours in the tables mean, and why isn't that explained anywhere in the article?
#why are there hardly any dates of when a commissioner was in office? Now it seems there's hundreds of current commissioners..
Therefore I added the missing information template. Hope someone can at least explain the colours.. Q300r bc2 (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right -- to those questions I'd add the question "why the hell are they in reverse chronological order?" Everything else on WP seems to be in ordinary chronological order... —Nightstallion 10:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: a) their political colours, that has been added in already. b) we don't know most of the dates, if you want to find them out go right ahead. And in regards to the order, well most recent can be first too if you're looking for someone. Doesn't matter as far as I'm concerned. You want to switch them all, be my guest.- J Logan t: 20:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Mh, fair enough. Let's leave it like that. —Nightstallion 21:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colours?! Dates?! 

message: A reader contacted Wikimedia regarding this article. While a careful read of the texts indicates that it is a list of all commissioners, and one can figure out that they are listed in order so the incumbent is the last in the list, it is hardly obvious. I urge someone to consider improving the presentation. One option is to add dates of service as a column heading which would help make it clear. Another option is to use a textual indication (italics, or bold) to distinguish the incumbent.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More clearly identify incumbent 

message: I have two suggestions for this article:
#I would add dates;
#I would eliminate EAEC authority and ECSC members or improve clarity.
Thanks, --Checco (talk) 16:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two suggestions 

message: Could you please add headshots of the commissioners? If that is not possible could you please link to an external resource that features pictures?--2A02:810A:11BF:E564:512A:8EBE:30F:D65E (talk) 19:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images please 

message: Shouldn't this article be more correctly named "List of European Commissioners by country" or "by member country"? -- Checco (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's name