lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:William Morris (disambiguation)

message: I have substantially restructured this DAB. I believe it is now earlier  to read and find entries. The headings have been alphabetized, entries are more consistently ordered by date of birth, some entries with confusing wording have been revised, a missing entry was added, the miscellaneous ("Other") section has been substantially reduced by finding appropriate homes for most of its entries, some freestanding sections have been combined (as subheadings) with related sections. Finally, because of the unusually large size of the page , I have moved the TOC to its normal space instead of on the right. It needs to be noticeable, so t he visitor doesn't miss it and end up having to scroll through the page needlessly.
I would also like to propose that there is no primary topic. The purpose of a primary topic is to identify the likely target among similarly named subjects, more likely than all the other topics combined to be the intent of an ambiguous search term. That's certainly not true here. It may not even be much more likely than, or even as likely as, some of the other topics. The textile designer (current primary) is probably no better known than, say, the founder of the William Morris group of agencies, or William "Speedy" Morris, the famous basketball coach.
For the purposes of DAB, let's move the current primary topic to be a standard entry. That may also mean that we need to discuss making the DAB the primary topic and the current William Morris article renamed to William Morris (textile designer). I intend no offence to the members of the William Morris Society, who do important work in informing the world of his importance, neither in my proposal to change the status of his article, nor in the reductionism that article titling necessitates.
Dovid (talk) 13:19, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantial overhaul
Talk:Connecticut Hall (Yale University)

message: Connecticut Hall article already covers this subject, is longer, older and seems to be the more natural title, so I've suggested that this article be deleted. I'm open to changing my mind if someone brings up an objection, but I think this should be uncontroversial. Noroton (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Noroton -- You notified me that you had tagged Connecticut Hall (Yale University) for deletion because it duplicated Connecticut Hall. Thanks for identifying the duplication.  They should be merged.  You can see that there are references in the tagged one that are not in the other.  I or the authors of the other page could merge the material which differs across the two pages, assisted by a merge tag on one or both places.  So please put a merger tag on it, instead, and take away the delete tag.  I will get to assisting with the merge, and/or the authors of the other page can merge the material over, too.  It is better process just to note that a merger is needed, with merger tags on one or both pages. doncram (talk) 09:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Greybull River

message: Info on the town of Greybull would be interesting to link/ref.  There is a WP page/article to connect. Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 10:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Greybull is already wikilinked in this article - info on the town itself should be in the article on the town itself. CosmicPenguin (talk• WP:WYOHelp!) 20:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town of Greybull
Talk:Sanpoil

message: I trimmed a bit from this sentence: The Sanpoil flourished with a large number of villages along the Sanpoil River and Nespelem River, tributaries of the Upper Columbia River below Big Bend since the 1600's. The footnote given goes to http://www.indigenouspeople.net/sanpoil.htm which says basically the same thing, except specifying "Big Bend, Oregon". This doesn't make much sense. There is no "Big Bend, Oregon" and unless I'm mistaken the Sanpoil didn't live near Oregon. My best guess is it's suppose to say something like "...and along the Columbia River above the Big Bend of the Columbia". The "Big Bend" being the reach of the river approx. between Hanford and Grand Coulee. But rather than guess, I just trimmed the sentence down a little. Pfly (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Below Big Bend
Talk:Dance forms of Tamil Nadu

message: Wiki Raja 10:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations

message: Mohiniattam and Kodiattam were originally dance forms of Tamilakkam(present Tamil Nadu,Kerala ans etc).Eventhough at present it is practised by other community,these arts initially find their mention in sangam poems or literature.Classical arts like this including Bharata Natyam later absorbed into Sanskrit culture during the wake of Brahminism in medieval Tamil Country most probably during 9th-12th century,so please include Mohiniattam and Kodiattam in this article.It is also noted that Mohiniattam is actually originated in Tanjavur,Tamil Nadu.--Rajendra Prasath Arumon (talk) 09:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mohiniattam and kodiyattam 
Talk:Miami State High School

message: lots of information on here should have sources but it doesn't... NickTheChicken11 (talk) 02:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to the recent revamp, this article now has 44 'inline citations' from reputable sources. Therefore, I do not think this concern is currently warranted. SMargan (talk) 04:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: This "Bentley Park College" Wikipedia page was completely revamped and updated recently. I have changed the status of this article ("start" -> class "B"), as a result of those changes. If anyone thinks that this reclassification was pre-emptive or in error, we should discuss it in this thread. SMargan (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Stub' Statuses

message: As of the date of writing this comment, the official "Miami State High School" website lists the Annual Reports available for download as "2020", "2021", "2022". However, the link to the 2020 Annual Report is actually a mislabeled link directly to the 2019 report. This could cause some confusion when looking through the 'inline citations', so I have raised this as a discussion thread in this 'talk' forum. When the school identifies and remedies the mistake a correction should be made, making the 2020 report available. However, until that time, the statistic for 2020 where obtained from the mentions of those figures in the 2021 Annual Report. SMargan (talk) 02:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Mislabeled 2019 Annual Report
Talk:Top of descent

message: Or by using a rule of thumb - e.g. if you desire a 500fpm rate of descent (1000ft every two minutes) then you need to multiply the number of thousand feet you need to descend (say, 12,000) by two and this gives you the number of minutes out from the destination you need to start descending (in this case 24 minutes).
So 24 minutes before your calculated ETA, you start descending.  Not so hard, really!
(This is for VFR flight.  No idea how IFR pilots do it)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.245.32.2 (talk) 03:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Top of descent may be calculated manually with considerable effort"
Talk:Schweizer SGS 1-26

message: Any other editors who have flown the 1-26 can put this box on their user page, if they so desire. - Ahunt (talk) 22:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox
Talk:Nalawort railway station

message: The location shown here and on google earth is not correct. Nalawort was approximately 800m further west.  I believe it closed before the "late 1950's" I do not think that it was a regular stopping place in the early 1950's, and there were no facilities of any kind there then.  However friendly "old-timer" engine drivers (not just railcars) would unofficially stop for locals if requested.  The location shown is approximately 400m West of the old Upper Sturt station.
Baska436 (talk) 01:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:SMS Novara (1850)

message: At first reading, I see two of them:
#There was no Austro-Hungarian Navy (K.u.K.) before Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867. At the time the ship made its famous voyage, it belonged to k.k. Navy of the Habsburg Empire.
#Novara was completely rebuilt in 1861-1862 and was propeller-driven frigate from then on, and by far huger (~50m => ~60m). She hadn't even the same Figurehead (object)! In fact, so-called "renewal work" had just been a trick to get the emperor's OK on the project -- he was hardly interested in his navy, was short of money, and would not have agreed in building a new ship. Research for the latest book, David G. L. Weiss, Gerd Schilddorfer: Novara – Österreichs Traum von der Weltmacht. Amalthea, Wien 2010,  (German). seems to prove that just about two ribs (Boat building) seem to have been used for the new hull ;) 
I recently edited :de:SMS Novara (1850) on those facts, but at this thime feel unable to improve enWP. Maybe some native speaker with ~Babel_2 German might care? --[w.] 09:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Bugs 
Talk:Novara-class cruiser

message: Per WP:OVERLINK we generally don't do this. --John (talk) 02:54, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, just saw this. I understand that WP:OVERLINK means we generally do not link Italy or France in an article, but I don't think that applies in this case as the nations I've been linking to in the article are to Kingdom of Italy and French Third Republic (among others). These are important links that I think should be included in the article as they aren't merely lazy links to modern Italy or France.--White Shadows Let’s Talk 04:05, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I know you think that. As locations, these are classic examples of overlinking though. There is also WP:EGG to consider. What is the benefit to the reader of a link like France on an article about a ship? --John (talk) 12:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Because France literally owned one of the ships. By that same logic, why should we link Austria-Hungary in any article about a ship from this class? That doesn't seem like a strong argument at all in favor of de-linking the nations involved here under WP:OVERLINK. Again, it's not like I'm lazily asking that we link France or Italy. I'm asking we link to the nations of the historical period who physically owned the ships and operated them. I don't see at all how WP:OVERLINK applies here.--White Shadows Let’s Talk 15:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Austria-Hungary I would leave linked because it is no longer a country. France and Italy (and Britain) are just links to previous "versions" of the existing and very commonly known countries, which is exactly the sort of thing OVERLINK is designed to prevent. Links like these are of no use to our readers, and may distract them from useful links, which is why they are deprecated. --John (talk) 19:13, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there was something about the French Third Republic specifically that was relevant to the acquisition of the ship (for instance, say there was a hypothetical arms deal that was rejected by the 4th republic but approved by the 5th under de Gaulle), I would leave this sort of link out. Parsecboy (talk) 23:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Very well, if that’s the consensus that exists I have no further objection.—White Shadows Let’s Talk 02:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking nations
Talk:SMS Sankt Georg

message: The following sentences in the article are wrong: "An enlisted man shot the ship's commander in the head, badly injuring him." "...four men were executed, including the sailor who had shot Sankt Georg's commander" The source given: Halpern, Cattaro mutiny p. 48–50. But Halpern's article in Bell’s and Elleman’s book starts on p. 54. On p. 59 Halpern writes that the Executive officer (in Austrian German: Gesamtdetailoffizier, GDO) was shot in the head and severely wounded. Plaschka writes that the commander of St. George was narrowly missed. de:Richard Georg Plaschka: Cattaro - Prag. Revolte und Revolution. Kriegsmarine und Heer Österreich-Ungarns im Feuer der Aufstandsbewegungen vom 1. Februar und 28 Oktober, 1918. Graz 1963, p. 40.
The source: Gericht des k.u.k. Kriegshafenkommandos in Cattaro: S.M.S. „St. Georg“. Referat und Antrag. Typoscript vom 9. April 1918, Austrian State Archives/War Archives, Sig. KA MAG KT.1. accessible online (5 December 2019) at:  says:  „Während sie [vier Leute] gegen Achter gingen, kam ihnen der inzwischen an Deck geeilte Korv. Kp. Zipperer entgegen und rief ihnen etwas zu, worauf sie einen oder zwei Schüsse auf ihn abfeuerten, so dass derselbe schwer verletzt zu Boden stürzte.“ (Rückseite von Bl. 1093) Und an anderer Stelle: „Auch der Schiffskommandant Frgt. Kpt. von Huber war auf Deck geeilt; dort schoss Ujdur aus dem Hinterhalt auf ihn, ohne ihn jedoch zu treffen.“ (vierte Seite von Bl. 1094) (Transl.: While they [four people] went against aft, the corvette captain Zipperer, who had rushed on deck in the meantime, went towards them, and shouted something to them, whereupon they fired one or two shots at him, so that the same fell to the ground severely injured. At another page: Also the ship commander Frgt. Kpt. von Huber had hurried on deck; there Ujdur shot him from ambush, but missing him.)
Ship's commander was frigate captain Huber Edler von Scheibenhain. 
--Kuhl-k (talk) 11:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship's commander was not shot, but the executive officer
Talk:SMS Admiral Spaun

message: This article appears to have been started in British English. Is there a reason it was changed? --John (talk) 10:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: *The article should likely be entirely in British English, but as an American it can sometimes be difficult to write in British English.—White Shadows Let’s Talk 12:54, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --John (talk) 07:23, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  would you be interested in helping me convert the article over to British English?--White Shadows Let’s Talk 01:16, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --John (talk) 10:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ENGVAR 

message: Id: 863215745301
Name:Jonathan Mpendulo Prince 41.121.73.213 (talk) 16:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CV
Talk:Carl Robert Osten-Sacken

message: I was the one who requested the boxes (check the edit history), and I've now given two valid edit summaries, which User:Cassianto failed to do. now User:Cassianto is just editwarring.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The box is a WP:DISINFOBOX.  Please justify why you feel one is needed on an article which is so small. While you do that, I'll restore the article back to its most stable state, as per WP:BRD. CassiantoTalk 08:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of infoboxes summarily without edit summaries
Talk:ARA Cabo San Antonio (Q-42)

message: Hi All, just wanted to comment that the recent move I made for this article is based on the convention used in the Argentine Navy for the pennant number (and already reflected in other wikiarticles about Argentinian ships).  Regards, DPdH (talk) 03:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent move from "... (Q42)" to "...(Q-42)

message: I'm in doubt if this article can qualify as Start, so will leave it as Stub for now. Regards, DPdH (talk) 07:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality re-assessment
Talk:Abdo

message: The Abdu article lists people named Abdo.  Makes sense to move the list of people to that article. Coastside (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Abdu 

message: It's obviously related to عبد, but what is it precisely? A generic hypocoristic for any name starting with عبد? 37.47.195.14 (talk) 22:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology?
Talk:Claire (programming language)

message: Reading this article doesn't give me a good description of who made this language and when or even what it's used for. I am unsure whether it is notable or not. - DaoKaioshin (talk) 11:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context? 
Talk:Akashi Domain

message: , the purpose of this list you have added is not clear at all. But I do not want to simply delete your work. This article is about the domain; a list of rulers is appropriate, but this even longer list of family members who were remotely related to the rulers is, in my opinion, not needed. Wouldn't it be better to create an article about the individuals and include it there? AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplified genealogy
Talk:Defence and Security Media Advisory Committee

message: Have removed the links to the "secret bases" website because it is not sufficiently relevant to the content of the page, as per wikipedia guidelines, and I suspect has been added for promotional purposes by the site author or an associate (also against wikipedia guidelines). Having looked through it, it's a highly entertaining (if somewhat self-aggrandising) resource about images in the public domain of British military and other bases. I did say in my edit notes that it was "non-notable" (notability is another of the wikipedia criteria for external links) but on a second look that is unfair, as it has a Google PR of 5. However, it still isn't really relevant enough to an article about the DA Committee, although I have no objections to it being included on a more relevant page - --Archstanton 04:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 
Talk:R.C. Evans

message: Why was this page moved from R.C. Evans to the full name? This person is (by a long shot) most commonly referred to by the name "R.C. Evans", and is close to never referred to by his full name. In other words, the name of the article appears to have been changed from the correct name per WP conventions to an incorrect one. Brilliant. Snocrates 04:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Ephraim Smith House

message: A photo that didn't focus on the two-car garage and demonstrates some of these purported "Greek Revival" features in this apparently perfectly undistinguished vernacular farmhouse would help convince the reader that the U.S. National Register of Historic Places isn't simply a political comedy act. --Wetman 00:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the photo. Indeed it wasn't easy to get and involved, well, trespassing. I think you can easily see the pedimented gable in the photo, and if you look the limestone foundation, unfortunately a dog kept me from getting closer. :-( --IvoShandor (talk) 11:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bridges (puzzle)

message: I created the puzzle that is used as the example on the page.  I didn't want to use a published puzzle because that could cause copyright problems.  I have now found three of the four possible solutions to the puzzle that the anonymous poster mentioned.  This new version should have a unique solution, though the puzzle is easier as a result.  Would someone else please try this puzzle because I didn't see the other solutions when I first posted the puzzle.
In the future, I think that it would be better to bring it up on this talk page if there is more than one solution found. — Val42 04:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Solutions
Talk:Barcode system

message: Hi all, 
I am currently working to expand the stub about barcode systems. This is a work in progess and if anyone would like to comment on the updates that have been made please feel free to do so. Any and all feedback and/or comments are more than welcome. 
Thanks,
Jmduncan 04:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I know nothing about the mobile computers specificaly used here :)  Mobile is a big space.   Best of luck though, it looks good at first glance.  Mathiastck 13:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile computing 

message: Possible sources to use:
*Bar Codes - The History of Bar Code
*A Short History Of Bar Code
*
— Senator2029 (talk) 14:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs additional citations for verification 

message: to Barcode  FergusArgyll (talk) 15:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Barcode#Merge proposal. I do not think WP:AFD is appropriate at this time. Please respond on the talk page there. Darcyisverycute (talk) 03:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, merging to barcode is what I was suggesting. It contains anything of value that this page contains. FergusArgyll (talk) 18:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete and redirect?
Talk:The Alchemyst: The Secrets of the Immortal Nicholas Flamel

message: WikiProject Children's literature  Thank you Zephfya (talk) 13:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please assess for

message: That is a LOT of information to put in one character area & I think that the quotes are a little overkill. I think that the quotes should stay on a character page devoted to that one character. There's really no need for quotes, as most other wiki entries for characters & books DON'T have quotes under each character. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Character info section needs to be pared down
Talk:Super Mario World (TV series)

message: I moved this information from another Wikipedia page.  I didn't realize that the previous page I moved the text from was plagerized.  It should be good now. --In Defense of the Artist 05:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I deleted this, but reverted my own edit. However, I must wonder why this section is necessary. There are no sources and there's nothing controversial about the show dealing with "social issues". CarringtonEnglish*ring!* 03:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversies Section

message: Most of the voice actors are Canadian. Therefore it can’t be a sole American tv show. It has to be Canadian American because of the majority of the voice actors being Canadian.  MetricSupporter89 (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change american to Canadian American
Talk:Army Public School, Mhow

message: just under stand wikipedia that many times i have created this article and every time it is deleted .so mind it this time dont you dear try to delete it other wise i'll file a case against you of 420
i am a student of this school and want others to know about it so i being a responsible student of the school its my respossibility to make others aware of this institute and dont you delete this article.
Thank you
Reeyash
(respossible Member of the online Encyclopedia)
(--Reeyash 05:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Caerula Sanguis

message: Not even Gally/ Alita herself has a separate article- nor do any other characters- but this one does? Is there a particular reason? Half the article needs specific citations, i.e. most of the 'Background' section, but particularly the 'Personality' section, which is otherwise purely an opinion piece. It just seems like this article exists for no other reason than Caerula Sanguis is somebody's favourite Battle Angel Alita: Last Order character, and particularly stands out due to the lack of any other individual character articles from the series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.120.87 (talk) 00:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this character?
Talk:Dama gazelle

message: Currently pages for all three subspecies link back to this page. Also, the language is choppy though citations are fine. Bovidaeloony (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Subspecies

message: It's not surprising, but certainly misleading that there's no mention of the large numbers of Dama Gazelle on Texas Exotic/Hunting ranches - as well as the recent changes in Federal law which may doom the species. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.129.244 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 23 August 2010‎
:Same genetic pool as those in zoo collections. Pretty much irrelevant I'm afraid.©Geni (talk) 16:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers

message: How should I pronounce the word dama?
Please add the IPA transcription for this word. Thank you :) 1.126.104.28 (talk) 12:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add IPA