Talk:Operation Bodyguard

message: Operation Mincemeat should not be included with the deception plans under Operation Bodyguard. Mincemeat was a plan associated with Operation Husky, which was the invasion of Sicily in July 1943. Therefore it should not be associated with Bodyguard at all. RashBold 14 July 2005 (UTC)
:See Talk:Operation Fortitude for references backing up the statement that Fortitude was a part of Bodyguard. DJ Clayworth 16:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Operation Mincemeat 

message: Having recently completed an undergrad paper on the subject of Operation Bodyguard, I find the lack of sources and information presented by this article a little disconcerting.  I am going to add some information and take out what is critically incorrect.
What really needs to be added is that the main components of Operation Bodyguard were the three Operation Fortitude sub-operations and the influences of the London Controlling Station (LCS) and the 'XX' Committee (Double Cross System), which I also intend to correct in the poorly researched and heavily biased Operation Fortitude article.
Largely, Operation Bodyguard was the command and control portion of the strategic deception operations leading to the Allied invasion of Normandy (Battle of Normandy  
[with the four (not three)sub-operations (Fortitude North, Fortitude South, Fortitude South II and Zeppelin).  The article does provide a good primer, but lacks the more detailed information necessary to provide real insight and information. (Added by User:142.109.100.30 at 17:54. 20 March 2006] 
If anyone has objections to this, feel free to contribute to the article yourself.
-Onward_KOCR User:OnwardKOCR,17:42, 20 March 2006
:Please do contribute. Expanding this is somewhere way down my to-do list, and you clearly know more about it than I do. I would draw your attention to the user who contributed to this article and talk page and also Operation Fortitude who (according to his own user page) is the author of a major book on the subject and contends that Fortitude was not part of Bodyguard, but separate. I don't have the knowledge to judge the validity of this. But seriously, write whatever you know. What we have here is very sketchy. DJ Clayworth 18:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of Article and Correction of Errors 

message: Every print source I've seen refers to the pre-invasion deception operations as "Plan Bodyguard." There's an apparent distinction in Allied military terminology of the time (and which I'm not entirely clear on) between what constituted a "plan" and what was an "operation" -- and it's not just between what was talked about and what actually happened. More than that, "Bodyguard" appears in the sources I've read to refer to the planning that preceded "Operation Fortitude," which was what was actually carried out -- divided into "Fortitude North" (Norway) and "Fortitude South" (Pas de Calais). So, are we sure the correct term is used in this article? --Michael K SmithTalk  14:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct name? 

message: :
Clarify: whose original plan?  Hitler originally planned to shift forces in two weeks, or the deception hoped merely to delay the shift by two weeks? —Tamfang (talk) 20:21, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Goods point; it was the plan that was supposed to delay the moves Errant (chat!) 10:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calais delais