lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:J. Evan Bonifant

message: 1. Miss/Guided (2007) ..... Engineer 
2. Wizards of Waverly Place (2007) ..... Jerko Phoenix
 3. The Nightmare Room (2001) ..... Chris 
4. As Told by Ginger (2000) ..... Sasha 
5. Nikki (2000) ..... Pud 
6. Blues Brothers 2000 (1998) ..... Buster 
7. Breakout (1998) ..... Joe Hadley 
8. Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997) ..... Kevin
 9. King of the Hill (1997) 
10. My Wildest Dreams (1995) ..... Danny McGinnis 
11. 3 Ninjas Kick Back (1994) ..... Michael `Tum Tum` Douglas 
12. Touched by an Angel (1994) ..... Steven 
13. Diagnosis Murder (1993) ..... Nicky Dunbar 
14. Dottie Gets Spanked (1993) ..... Steven Gale 
15. Law & Order (1990) ..... Joey Reynolds 
16. Full House (1987) ..... Kenny 
17. One Life to Live (1968) ..... Al Buchanan 
18. General Hospital (1963) ..... Lucas Stansbury Jones #7  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.7.15.169 (talk) 17:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movies acted in
Talk:Peter Malick

message: I tagged this as an article written like an ad, with a lot of peacock words and opinionated claims like "legendary bluesman" (not for him, for someone else, but nevertheless). I moved some stuff around, took out most of the egregious problems, including overformatting, and left it in an intelligible state. But it still needs sourcing and the reviews at the bottom should be incorporated either into articles on the albums or the body of the article as sources, not as an indiscriminate list that violates WP:EL. It does seem that Malick is notable, but the article's promotional tone buried that and I almost nominated it for deletion. By moving the key claims of notability into the lead it clarifies what is important about his career. --Dhartung | Talk 07:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Brown–Driver–Briggs

message: What did he have to do with BDB? StAnselm 00:06, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is listed as a contributor at the ISBN. I presume this is because the Strong's numbers are included in the BDB text as a cross-reference. It's probably more a case of acknowledgement than actual contribution. Feel free to remove his name if you think the ISBN note is misleading. I can see a good case for that, but I like the courtesy of the acknowledgement. Alastair Haines 16:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: James Strong?

message: I've removed a link to something that claimed to be the "Gesenius, Brown Driver Briggs Lexicon." It wasn't. There's a whole bunch of abbreviated little copies of somebody's Hebrew lexicon floating around on the internet claiming to be BDB. Alephb (talk) 13:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Link 

message: How is the "NAS Old Testament Hebrew Lexicon"/"Brown, Driver, Briggs, Gesenius Lexicon" (see here) exactly connected to the New American Standard Bible (NASB)? Probably a byproduct of the translation effort, but cannot find a clear & quotable source. And is it = the "New American Standard Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible"? , maybe you would know? Please check my "See also" entry and add/fix whatever is needed. Thanks, Arminden (talk) 10:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact connection to NASB
Talk:Tuesday (2008 film)

message: do any of u know whn this films out or is it already been shown.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kami-Sama (talk • contribs) 21:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Release date, as said on the website, is 10th October 2008 157.203.42.132 (talk) 10:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Realese
Talk:List of VistaVision films

message: It's always struck me as odd that a handful of Japanese films from the '60s and '70s are referred to as VistaVision productions, since they were produced well after the format was abandoned elsewhere (except for SFX work) and they don't seem like the sort of thing that would generally lend itself to the format. (Death by Hanging, for example, was a low-budget independent production.) I've come across a couple of items that seem to clear up the issue.
1) The booklet included with the Criterion DVD/Blu-ray of Death by Hanging states the following:
Although a variety of sources assert that Death by Hanging was filmed in Paramount Pictures' proprietary 8-perforation VistaVision widescreen format, Criterion has determined, after much research, that an alternate 4-perforation Japanese "Vista" format was employed instead; thus it was the 4-perf Japanese Vista negative that was used as the source for our transfer.
So we can say fairly definitively that Death by Hanging, at least, is not a VistaVision film.
2) The Japan-based film critic/historian Stuart Galbraith IV writes the following in his review of the White Christmas Blu-ray:
Wikipedia lists several Japanese films as being shot in VistaVision: Vengeance Is Mine, In the Realm of the Senses, etc., but this is incorrect. In Japan 1.85:1 widescreen is advertised as "VistaVision size," referring to the screen shape, not the negative format.
Indeed, the Japanese Wikipedia article on screen formats explains that the phrase "ビスタ・サイズ" ("Vista size") originated with VistaVision but is now used to refer to any film employing matted widescreen. (Anecdotally speaking, I have seen the word ビスタ "Vista" used frequently on Japanese DVD packaging for films in 1.85:1, including many that are unambiguously not VistaVision productions.) 
Perhaps some Japanese films were produced in the actual horizontal 8-perf VistaVision process, but in light of the above information, I think all the Japanese productions on the list should be removed unless evidence is found that these films were actually shot in the 8-perf process—preferably from Japanese sources, since the use of "Vista size" for matted widescreen seems to be exclusive to Japan and non-Japanese sources clearly conflate it with VistaVision. -71.42.151.123 (talk) 03:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Japanese "VistaVision" films
Talk:Adventist Health Columbia Gorge

message: Why would someone advertise a small rural hospital on Wikipedia? It is really the only hospital in the town of The Dalles. What is remarkable is the commitment to patient centered care, that has even paid financial dividends...
:Brian, it's pretty easy to find through Google that you work there... --Fabrictramp 00:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: COI

message: I think the Distinguished designation shows notability but there are more sources available. I cleaned out the worsr of the peacocks. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 19:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Ready Steady Go (L'Arc-en-Ciel song)

message: What about the Generation X song from the 1970s? Theinfo (talk) 15:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Generation X
Talk:Executioner's sword

message: The swords "were lacking a point," yet the illustration clearly shows a standard two-handed sword, point and all. Can someone clear this up? Xiphe 02:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have serious doubts the sword depicted dates from 1484, but I have to admit this seems to be what the label suggests. We need more and better sources. --dab (𒁳) 19:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies 

message: What would be the reason for them? 70.50.4.186 (talk) 01:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure about the veracity of it, but in the manga Innocent these swords are portrayed, and the holes are said to whistle when there's bad edge alignment in the cut 185.185.55.72 (talk) 03:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three holes in the tip of the blade
Talk:The Adventures of Tintin (film)

message: When Red Rackham enters the hold there appears to be much more than the four hundredweight stated by Haddock, could it be that Spielberg, as an American, was unfamiliar with the Imperial system of weights and measures?PC 5002 (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treasure. 

message: I am not sure why this wrong piece of info has been present on this article for as long as it has been, but it is time it is corrected. Under Production, Filming and Visual Effects, it is stated that "Spielberg finished six weeks of additional motion-capture filming in mid-July 2009." This is wrong. The original shoot took six weeks from late January 2009 to March 2009. It is highly unlikely that they would shoot that much weeks of additional filming. The source, which is a piece from The Hollywood Reporter, is referring to the original six week shoot, not "six weeks of additional motion-capture filming."
There were a week of reshoots that took place in June 2009, "so that any holes in Spielberg's original material might be patched." This is what should be mentioned instead. I hope someone makes the appropriate corrections in the article.
Source: https://www.slashfilm.com/503428/empire-spill-tintin-beans-galore-second-film-coming-really-soon/ Greatopinionator (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information under Production
Talk:Saskatoon Fringe Theatre Festival

message: Please feel free to expand or discuss this page. By the way, does anyone know how to put the stub notice on this article? I'm also welcome to criticism, this is the first article I've created. JoeyETS 02:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand and stubs

message: Is that enough to remove the 3rd party source label? I'll keep adding more.JoeyETS 15:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 3rd party source

message: Sorry to keep undoing your edits. This is a minor technicality, and a confusing aspect of the Saskatoon Fringe. The Saskatoon Fringe itself has only been around since 1990. See: http://www.25thstreettheatre.org/fringe2007/index.html under Fringe History.
The 25th Street Theatre Company has existed since 1972, as per http://www.25thstreettheatre.org/25thHistory.htm but did not have a Fringe until 1990. If we start an acticle about the theatre company, which we might want to, that date would go there. Am I wrong on this?
Sorry to be picky about such a minor technicality. I know your intentions are good, and you've done a lot of good work for this article. Thanks so much! JoeyETS 04:02, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1972 vs. 1990
Talk:Old Idaho State Penitentiary

message: I added a short paragraph on the oral history collection. I listed Kathy Hodges as the author. I am not up on cataloging of archival resources, so I am unsure if this is actually the correct citation. Let me know if this works in the article. I used a basic web citation template. I can't find one specifically for archival collections. --Robbie Giles 15:26, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prison Guards interviews
Talk:Erik Skjoldbjærg

message: Hello!  I cannot find his (Erik Skjoldbjærg's) contact (email), yet. But in case you know him, or anyone who played a role, for instance in his movie "Pyromaniac" - you could tell him that themes like this would be quite adapt to be played in outro (or also during one of his movies)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0ra5DRy9SI
UNENDLICHER FRIEDEN - Stärke deine innere Ruhe & Schwierige Zeiten meistern (Heilende Musik) --109.75.93.111 (talk) 21:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfect Theme(s)
Talk:Titanoides

message: Is the date of "60 million years ago" correct and can it be backed up?  That timeframe seems too early for this kind of animal at that location.  It is my understanding that there were no large mammals of this type in existence until several million years later.  
The only other reference I've seen to titanoides living "60 million years ago" was in a recent newspaper article, the vagueness and poor writing of which could easily suggest a misprint. 208.53.232.255 03:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tom Mardirosian

message: Tom Mardirosian might be better known as a theatre actor than for his film and television work, though he had a long-running role on Oz. I think the sheer number of secondary source articles in The New York Times alone is enough to establish notability.  --GentlemanGhost (séance) 23:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Pizza

message: The redirect Pizza! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pizza!]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: It has been suggested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dessert pizza that dessert pizza should redirect to a section of this page, which I think is a good idea. Watch this space. Andrewa (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is my suggestion. Andrewa (talk) 22:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded it. PamD 07:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dessert pizza
Talk:Sukeban

message: This term is rather confusing as it can have multiple meanings. Do these gangs go around torturing slugs? Do they torture people by slugging them? Or does it mean something completely different?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.115.18 (talk) 01:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going with that probably being vandalism, given all the google hits on 'sukeban "slug torture"' are references to this page. -- Resuna (talk) 11:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slug torture? 

message: I can't find any evidence on these two supposed organizations, the oldest google result is unsourced (https://web.archive.org/web/20230602145729/https://dbpedia.org/page/Sukeban) and the provided citations are just photo articles that seem to just plagiarize the dbpedia page. Largling (talk) 18:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubius sources for "Tokyo's United Shoplifters group" and "Kanto Women Delinquent Alliance"
Talk:Mississippi River State Fish and Wildlife Area

message: I couldn't find the GPS coord for this.--Kranar drogin 03:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:Metalinguistics

message: Most of the facts in this article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information, but there are some statements where it says "citation needed." Furthermore, many of the references are quite general. Many of the people who wrote the cited works are authors of entire books related to linguistics or metalinguistics specifically. The sources are relatively current; the majority of the sources are from 2010-2015 so even though they are a couple years old, they are relatively recent. The article does not really include a diverse spectrum of authors, nor does it include historically marginalized individuals. The links in the article seem to be working as well.
ArushiBhatia321 (talk) 21:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Martin Savage (actor)

message: He lives in Upper Norwood, London. I know this because I live nearby.
Not sure if this should be added though, I presume i need some sort of reference.
MichaelKeefe 23:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  He lives in... 

message: He's moving today to Hertfordshire (from Upper Norwood, where I previously mentioned he lived) MichaelKeefe 09:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New residence - hertfordshire
Talk:Viva Las Vegas (song)

message: Not a great example of how to write a Wikipedia article: "the long under credited and (believed by many) almost criminally undercompensated songwriters"  --Mathew5000 06:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: There seems to be little distinction between these two categories. The 'cover versions' section includes many 'appearances in other media'. 82.150.96.2 (talk) 11:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Appearances in other media' and 'Cover versions' should be merged 

message: Please add a note about Dead Kennedys cover version of this song as it was recorded in 1980, long before ZZTop cover - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresh_Fruit_for_Rotting_Vegetables 212.3.223.35 (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Kennedys cover
Talk:Mamie Gummer

message: .... have nothing to do with Gummer.  Meryl Streep has won a lot of awards and achieved a lot in her life, but none of this is relevant to the fact that she is Gummer's mother.  The fact that Gummer followed in her footsteps is also not associated with Meryl Streep's Oscar.  Simply this is mentioning Streep's Oscars out of context and for no valid reason.  Please see WP:UNDUE and WP:NPOV.  Also the fact that she made a film for a director who was Oscar nominated is irrelevant to Gummer.  Lasse Hallström is an Oscar nominee, Vanessa Redgrave is an Oscar winner, so is Marcia Gay Harden, Toni Collette and Glenn Close are Oscar nominees, and Michael C. Hall has won some awards too.   I think there are probably a bunch of Golden Globes, SAGs, BAFTAs, Tony Award and Emmy Awards associated with the people mentioned in this article, so why not mention all of these?  Because they are not relevant to Mamie Gummer.  And that is why I've removed this from the article.  Let's not try to establish Mamie's notability by her association with other notable people.  It's enough that the article name drops seemingly every notable actor/director she's worked with.  Let's not try to say that their awards rub off on her somehow.  Rossrs (talk) 13:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am calm.  I was only expanding on the reasons I provided in my initial edit.   It looks much better now.  Thank you.  Rossrs (talk) 20:32, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

text: I apologise if you feel I overreacted and I think I did overreact.  Now that I read my comments again a few days later, perhaps I was not as calm as I thought.  No hard feelings though, I hope.  Rossrs (talk) 07:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Oscars won or nominated by people associated with Gummer

message: Mamie Gummer made her adult motion picture debut  - present in text as of 2011-02-01. I think that it can be worded better, but I do not know how right off the bat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.233.249.102 (talk) 08:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfortunate wording 
Talk:Popov (vodka)

message: "Popov also can come in glass bottles, which was the common purchased material of Brandon Volas in 2005, contributing to the demise of his baseball career."
Where exactly did that information come from?
That guy is a freaking moron!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.43.244.202 (talk) 02:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck? 

message: Haha...you funny. :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saint Invective (talk • contribs) 19:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "elegant plastic jug" 

message: I fail to understand the statement "used by personal injury lawyers."  
Lawyers make bank, drink fine liquor and do cocaine, they do not, however, drink British piss out of a bottle.
I think this part should be deleted, leaving the college students part of the statement intact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.236.128.27 (talk) 02:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  used by who? 
Talk:Caitlynne Medrek

message: Where can I contact her?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Naomi19 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:Flagship (magazine)

message: This article reads like it was copied off of Flagship magazine's web site. There are no sources cited. It is unduly fawning and adulatory towards the magazine.70.55.58.171 03:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 04:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Flagship Magazine →  – Reasons:
* http://www.flagshipmagazine.co.uk has back issues, and throughout it's always called Flagship. There are no examples of a proper noun title Flagship Magazine. Other than the domain name itself which I think serves as a disambiguator 
* The article was once called Flagship magazine with magazine lower case it operates as a disambiguation and those should be in parentheses per dab guidelines.
-- GreenC 04:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 July 2022
Template talk:ExtEvent nav

message: Category:Wikipedia pages using copied template without oldid
I created this navigation box because that is what I do. I am not an extinction expert. Please add/change/delete as appropriate.--Old Hoss 03:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Or should they? I'm going to add the ones I know about - please add others if appropriate! Verisimilus T 21:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor events should be added?
Talk:Bad Biology

message: This article is missing important information on the film's production which needs to be added to the article. The plot summary should also be expanded a little bit more as well.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information and Expansion 

message: "Rotten Tomatoes, a review aggregator, reports that 100% of five surveyed critics gave the film a positive review; the average rating is 7.2/10."
Five is the minimum number of critis to even get a rating percentage at all on Rotten Tomatoes. That number is really far too low to be reliable. A result of 100% while users only gave 36% is pretty misleading. 77.185.153.180 (talk) 17:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: User ratings are irrelevant per WP:USERG. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings
Talk:Jangada

message: Thanks, Wladston, for the initial translation from pt.WP!  I think I've done the best I can for an initial edit/fixup, but there are a couple of areas which still need a little help.
1.  The "bolina" board sounds an awful lot like a centerboard to me, and I have fixed it up with that assumption in mind.  But some verification that it is a fin-like board, and some clarification of its location and details of its articulation would be helpful.  (I think its slot was forward of the mast, but I'm not sure.  And was some poor guy just sitting there and holding the thing in the right place for days on end?)
2.  It looks like the German page has more content than the Portuguese page!  Or, at least, more section headers and more images.  The French page has an additional photo, too.  It's probably worth doing some content comparison... wish I spoke more languages.
3.  The final page (beginning with "Knowledge of constructing this family of artisan watercraft") and the one two paragraphs above that (beginning with "The first jangada sailors threw their boats into the sea") need help.  I do not understand what the Portuguese page was trying to say, so I cannot make sense of these paragraphs.
4.  "This asymmetry is due to the manipulation high of the mast, that turns gently - this time using the lever mechanic principle - around its axis."  Turning around its axis... in a spiral?  Or just a mast raked back in a parabolic curve?  I think I'd need to see a diagram to understand how levers apply here.  I think I don't understand the details of this paragraph well enough to clarify it.
Infinoid 14:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Also known as a "lain sail" ". In pt Wikipedia this says "conhecida como "vela latina" " - "Latin sail". Presumably this is "lateen sail", but I don't know, myself - I'll mess around with it a little. -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 21:20, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial edit
Talk:Tulagi

message: This page knows nothing///.--68.41.150.38 03:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Is a mapframe map superior to the existing maps?  Geo Swan (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  add <mapframe> 

message: According to the article, the island is . This seems inaccurate as it seems to imply the area of the island would be closer to 5.5 sq km. Is it that the island is 1 km at its widest? TartarTorte 23:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 

message: The peopulation of the town in the lede is greater than the population of the island in the infobox. Boscaswell talk 07:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population info mismatch