Talk:Hospitality point of sale systems

message: It may be observed that this article lacks sourced information. The primary reason for this is because the only information I came across is from propriatary sources. I did a websearch and came on a lot of product specific data but very little in the way of neutral information. I will continue looking however. Piercetp 04:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of reference sources. 

message: I don't believe this article needs to exist. It is a stub at best, and I don't see why it exists outside of the regular Point of Sale article. Timneu22 (talk) 10:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Hospitality is a totally different technology. Particularly because resturaunts, and espcially fast food resturaunts require very efficient systems. The current resturaunt environment involves technology found nowhere else. For instance, the coexistance of wireless technology with display monitoring systems for Kitchen Video Systems (KVS) and Drive Through (DT) is unique to this system. Most other forms of retail systems do not use these. I believe this article should remain. Piercetp (talk) 07:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete 

message: This article should be merged with point of sale. There really isn't much of a difference between the two articles. Also, both are short, so it will be better to have one article with relevant content. I disagree with the previous section's statement that "POS" and "hospitality POS" are totally different. Some companies have POS in Burger King, Ruby Tuesday, and even Ritz Carltons. There is no need to split up the two. 
Further, just by the nature of the title of this article, people will think this is a great place to add hyperlinks to startups and other non-notable POS vendors. I'd like to see one article maintained well; not two separately. Timneu22 (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But point of sale sucks too. Why not combine them and then make an effort to make it good?Timneu22 (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that was my point.  ;-)  //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 20:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whoops. I misread your statement! Let's do it, then. Timneu22 (talk) 22:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

text: The article was very thoroughly sourced. The problem is that any attempts to quote valid sources were deleted because they were from propriatary sources. I strongly disagree with merging these articles. I believe it should stay as it is. If you can find product-neutral sources to add to this article, than please do so.Piercetp (talk) 01:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Considering this article is entirely unsourced (completely original research), I see no case that this article should exist separately from point of sale.  //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But point of sale sucks too. Why not combine them and then make an effort to make it good?Timneu22 (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that was my point.  ;-)  //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 20:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whoops. I misread your statement! Let's do it, then. Timneu22 (talk) 22:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

text: The article was very thoroughly sourced. The problem is that any attempts to quote valid sources were deleted because they were from propriatary sources. I strongly disagree with merging these articles. I believe it should stay as it is. If you can find product-neutral sources to add to this article, than please do so.Piercetp (talk) 01:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate article