Talk:Italian wolf

message: I love wolves, especially Italian ones, but there isn't any information on the net that decently describes Italian wolves and their habits!
--Regeane Silverwolf
I'm trying to do a speech on Italian wolves, but there is no good info.
--Gustave Wolf
:The tag says info may be found on this page. This page says it needs info. It does not compute. When finished I'm taking out the tag. But, there is too info on the Internet. I think your student expectation that someone else will do the work for you is not appropriate to an educational context. No pain no gain. Bite the bullet, face up to what actually can be done, but it can't be done if you won't do it.Dave (talk) 00:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for info

message: According to MSW3, the most up to date mammal taxonomy source, canis lupus communis is now considered synonymous to canis lupus lupus, the Eurasian Wolf: http://www.bucknell.edu/msw3/browse.asp?id=14000739 Mariomassone (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be merged 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Italian wolf's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "agga2007":
From Himalayan wolf: 
From Indian wolf: 
From Origin of the domestic dog: 
Reference named "koepfli2015":
From Himalayan wolf: 
From Gray wolf: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Now fixed, my AI friend. William Harris • (talk) • 10:08, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Italian wolf]] 

message: Article raised to Mid-level importance - this wolf haplotype is directly related to the extinct Pleistocene wolves of Europe.
William Harris • WikiProject Dogs • talk •   08:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Italian wolf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109205016/http://www.wnmuoutdoors.org/PDF/Linnell2002_Wolves.pdf to http://www.wnmuoutdoors.org/PDF/Linnell2002_Wolves.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked, working. William Harris • (talk) • 10:05, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The end of article paragraph 8, or, the end of paragraph 2 under the subheading "Lineage" has a sentence that reads as follows: "The Italian wolf is the only remaining grey wolf subspecies included in this ancient haplogroup." One can guess that the editor is referring to haplogroup 2 here, but the way the paragraph is currently written, one cannot arrive at that conclusion with certainty.  Could the original editor please clarify?  Thanks. 2601:543:4200:73E0:89CE:BA1E:81C8:FEAA (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haplogroup number uncertainty