Talk:Covert hypnosis

message: Hi today i am starting the article on covert hypnosis 23/august/2006 i will be as scientific as possible with lots of references and quotations
I know many will immediately disagree with any ideas portrayed about <a href="http://streethypnotism.com">covert hypnosis</a>; because its even more eccentric than the concepts in formal hypnosis; but i hope we can overcome this by me talking about covert-hypnosis as a phenoma that some people believe in......and therefore it deserves credit.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Error265 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editor comments 

message: I deleted this section as original research.  It cited references, but it should have been a distillation of material already published, not an essay.TheRingess 07:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin section

message: *Merge: This describes and application of the milton model. It could be merged there. --Comaze 12:46, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with milton model. 

message: Half of the 'Signs you're not using an analytical mind' is written in the second person. Why not write it in third person like the rest of the article?
Mfcrox Aug 4 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfcrox (talk • contribs) 21:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Person in 'Signs you're not...' 

message: 'covert' hypnosis (as it is addressed in this article) should be considered conversational hypnosis. Since covert hypnosis can be conversational hypnosis, but not all covert hypnosis is conversational hypnosis.
Chwrgy (talk) 03:18, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversational Hypnosis 

message: I am editing a number comments on this page implying that convert hypnosis is a real phenomenon. NLP is controversial at best, at worst it is pure pseudoscience. There is no good scientific evidence for covert hypnosis.
The claim that Darren Brown uses covert hypnosis is unverifiable and probably inaccurate. Brown has never claimed to have used NLP in any of his performances.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinCB (talk • contribs) 04:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual Issues

message: I've added a note to Talk:Methods of neuro-linguistic programming#Request about the overlap and possible conflicts between the Methods of neuro-linguistic programming#Sleight of Mouth article section and this article. --Marc Kupper|talk 01:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge/consolidation of topics needed regarding "Sleight of Mouth" 

message: Currently, the article is in the preferred state of a PROFRINGE editor who has been trying to force their view against consensus in a slow-motion edit war,
I request that the article be reverted back to its most recent stable version, until such time as said editor is able to achieve consensus on the talk page. 74.70.146.1 (talk) 16:50, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: as this page is protected for content conflicts, please establish a consensus for the change here first.  Please note, most pages are protected at The Wrong Version. — xaosflux Talk 17:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request, 12/12/18 

message: What do the professionals offer as to how to go about exposing covert hypnotic abuse?Katesisco (talk) 19:52, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that there is strong evidence for the effectiveness of covert hypnosis.  On the other hand, hypnosis is no longer part of standard psychology practice and considered both pseudoscientific and potentially harmful (i.e. see false memory syndrome).  —PaleoNeonate – 20:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exposing covert hypnotic abuse 

message: I feel this term is very similar to " hellspeak " & " dawn's dropping ( of and relating to "eve's dropping" ).. and these religious and superstitious activities are directly linked with this article
B.carter
abezdoe@gmail.com Abezdoe (talk) 22:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding The Phrase " sleight if mouth "