lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SC-4 (Star Trek)

message: Surely the "SC" in "SC-4" stands for "Starfleet Command" and as such is just a registry in the same way that a starship's shuttles carry the name of their home starship, plus a number.
Therefore SC-4 shouldn't be a class of starship.
Maybe it should be merged into an expanded Shuttlecraft article instead?
Rmkf1982 14:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a type of shuttlecraft, its class is also unknown, and so is its name so its registry will suffice, presentlythere is enough information to warrant an article. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Enterprise Football League

message: This topic will probably need a name change, since it is about the first divison of the leage, but what is the official name of the league? It seems like every website has a different name for it! -- Asdf1248 07:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just going to ask the same question. Since 2006, the first divion league has renamed to 富邦企業足球聯賽. I'm not sure what its English name should be because I cannot find any translation on the Internet. Maybe Fubon Enterprise Football League? Besides, currently there're only 4 teams in the league: Tatung, Taipower, China Steel (奧運代表隊), and Fubon (中華男足＝國訓?). -- scchiang 11:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What the...but 國訓 is Lu Kuang, a.k.a. the Taiwan army team. Maybe we should wait until the CTFA site is fully up to see? -- Asdf1248 12:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it's the answer: "由中華男足培訓隊化身的富邦金控、北京奧運培訓隊化身的中國鋼鐵，與台灣足壇老牌勁旅大同、台電進行3循環熱戰，將為台灣再掀足球高峰！" -- scchiang 14:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm...so that's the 2006 season over. Do you know where the game stats and results can be found? CTFA's website takes forever to upgrade. -- Asdf1248 15:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm editing it in my own sub page since I don't know which name is better. I cannot find official reports in CTFA. The results I used are based on the reports of LTSPorts. -- scchiang 16:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Hmm...I don't think we need to. After all, it is sort of the same league, just with new sponsorship. However, I'll make the Fubon Enterprise Football League topic to redirect to this topic. -- Asdf1248 13:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Hmm...maybe "Taiwan Enterprise Football League"? I dunno...I just feel that it needs to stay "Taiwan-ish." Also, in , it labels the full name as "中華民國九十六年企業足球聯賽，簡稱『企業聯賽』." -- Asdf1248 03:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change? 
Template talk:GANotice

message: I tried to remove this template from somebody's talk page, and ended up blanking it! I'm not completely sure how to revert it. I really hope I didn't cause too much damage, it really wasn't intentional.--Grand Slam 7 16:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone please revert my stupid mistake!!!! 

message: I'm requesting a new version of the template, minus any hold, failed, or passed status. I generally like to introduce myself and inform users before I actually do the review, so a general intro template for GA reviewing would be nice. VanTucky (talk) 15:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI 

message: I think we need a template for letting nominators know that a second opinion has been requested, but the first review is up. Million_Moments (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. Philroc (talk) 12:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Opinion Template

message: It'd be nice if the basic form of this template linked to the subpage where the GA nomination is hosted.  talk 03:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here to request the same thing. It seems really goofy that there's no link to the assessment page from this template. However, to actually make the edit, we'd need to make the Legobot source provide an assessment page number parameter, which I'm not entirely confident that it has when it's calling this function. jp×g 21:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking to the assessment subpage 

message: I messed around with the sandbox a little, and came up with a modification that allows the template to be used more helpfully without affecting existing usage in any way. It works perfectly fine on all of the test cases. Basically, you can add a reviewlink parameter and the message will include a link to the actual review page; if you don't, it will continue to function the way it always did. jp×g 22:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of "reviewlink" parameter, 2022 January 1
Talk:Nick Arrojo

message: A redundancy in listing of clients.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.113.168 (talk) 05:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nick, I have very problematic hair.  It is very thin (it doesn't seem to grow) and very fine.  I'm 63 years old and don't know what color would accentuate my skin color or other features.  I'm at my wits end of what to do. I keep changing hair stylists in my area, however all don't seem to have the skill for the kind of haircut that would make my hair thick or manageble.  I am on a very tight budget however, could you consider giving me tips?  I live in Lafayette, LA.  Do you ever come down south - Lafayette, Louisiana. THANKS FOR WHATEVER HELP YOU CAN PROVIDE.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.166.209.169 (talk) 17:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ````
Talk:Yangpu, Shanghai

message: An enthusiastic resident or the local chamber of commerce seems to have written the "recent history" section. I was able to translate most of it into English, although some of the claims still need to be supported with English or (if needs be) Chinese sources.
:One of the region's largest districts, 15.5 kilometers of the Changbai Gold-Bin River runs through the economically strong center.
I have no idea what this is talking about. Changbai New Village Subdistrict? The Qiu River? Jin-something? — LlywelynII 05:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: But such information should be put into a new section instead of in "History"? Zowtow (talk) 07:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a new section of "Economy" and moved related info to the new section. Zowtow (talk) 12:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 21st century

message: While we're on that, a short treatment of the remaining waterways in the district would be nice. (Talking about all of the older ones seems like overkill.) I know there's the old canal they dug out to shorten the bend in the Huangpu; there's the Yangshupu/Yangtzepoo Creek that gave the district its name; there's the Qiu "River" (Qiu/Jeu Jiang) north of that;... any others? Are they all canals? (If so, when were they created?) Are some natural? (If so, what are their sources and how are they doing?) — LlywelynII 05:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Rivers
Talk:Gurgen Askaryan

message: Article seems to have been written by a crazy person 143.239.130.50 (talk) 16:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have objections to the content, better state it instead of name-calling. In the References section it is mentioned that the article is based on the biographical paper about Gurgen Askaryan written by his friend and colleague Boris Bolotovskii. The Wikipedia article is almost entirely composed of exact excerpts from Bolotovskii's paper, who has given his permission to Wikipedia. Zachrw (talk) 22:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello,
Thank you very much to all the contributors : this article has now been translated into french.
Regards and Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 07:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 
Talk:Eble II of Ventadorn

message: dans un article consacré à Eble d'ussel, François PIROT évoque Eble de Ventadour et donne comme date de décès 1147, à la croisade d'Orient.
Vous mentionnez 1151, soit quatre ans plus tard en Italie. Quelles sont vos sources?
Merci
D STAMPART
::In fact I wrote 1155 in the article, but why?
::I believe that my source was the following web page  which calls him "DE VENTADOUR, Ebles III le Cantador" [sic] and gives the following details: "Naissance: après 1086. Décès: 1155 à Mont Cassin Italie. Profession: Vicomte. Profession : Vicomte de Ventadour. Décès : au retour de la 2ème croisade."
::Is this reliable? Maybe not. But maybe 1147 is not the true date of death, but the date on which the last reliable record of his life is found (not the same thing!) Note this web page  which says "A cet Èble, premier vicomte en résidence à Ventadour, mort vers 1195, succéda son fils Èble II, dont l’existence est attestée jusqu’en 1147"
::If you find further information I would be very interested! Andrew Dalby 19:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ChessBase

message: I've made a number of changes to give a more neutral point of view. The original was just too much like an advert for Chessbase, saying their software is dominent, their server is the dominent one in Europe etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drkirkby (talk • contribs) 
Now it reads more like an attack of the company for its commercialism, and offers editorials on the quality of the product. Are 8000 games too few? For what purpose? I used the trial version for two years with immense benefit to my chess playing. From my POV 8000 is not "too few" for all purposes.--JStripes 12:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've modified this section to render it more neutral.--JStripes 13:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

text: OK, I've addressed these points. BlueValour 23:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a new version of Chessbase light out now that is based on the newer Chessbase 9.  I believe that there is also a Spanish version of the website (not just German and English).  (TimmyBx 20:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: To balance the article it needs to have a criticism section as well as comparing it with other programs. Does chessbase endorse standards, does it have an update policy? Where are the updates for it's newer products on it's website? Why did Fritz play Kramnik when it's not the number 1 program in the world? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.213.119.163 (talk) 20:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism/Comparisons to others?

message: The see also section is strange: it lists SCID, but not Chess Assistant or Chess Informant Reader (possibly competing services), and it lists other online playing sites, but a terribly quirky list. I tried to give it some consistency by deleting half of the links, but these were restored. There needs to be some logic to the set of links offered. Right now I don't see any.--JStripes 12:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  see also 

message: The article needs better organization. Information about the playchess server is buried in a section on "the company", but the see also section is dominated by a list of other chess servers.--JStripes 12:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: I did a search for the term "Bookup" and found nothing.  Possibly I'm not well versed in searching Wikipedia.  Anyway, ChessBase servesa market of about 110,000 chess players with their line of excellent products.  Bookup serves a fraction of that (about 25,000) with its line.  I would expect Wikipedia to at least mention it.  Perhaps it should have its own wiki?  I'd likely be pilloried if I edited it myself. :)  MikeLeahyAtBookup (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bookup

message: What's wrong with using the former screenshot (1024x740 pixels)? The current file version is so low resolution that it's just a blur. Urbanus Secundus (talk) 16:47, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot image
Talk:Ranger (magazine)

message: I removed the young from the reference to young boys.  I am sure the target market were not that young. The whole "quality" approach was surely aiming a slightly older boys. This is shown by the fact that it was merged into "Look and Learn" and not some other comic in the stable.
What does "In November 2004, Ranger was purchased from IPC Media by Look and Learn Magazines Ltd." mean ?
::-- Beardo 15:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm unsure of the threshold for splitting pages; I've generally not done [[List of <<publication>>]] pages for short-lived titles but that's as much because there hasn't been a gigantic amount of information out there form Jet, Thunder, Jag, Champion 2, etc. whereas there's more on Ranger and more on the strips themselves too for the larger part. So I;m not sure if the page is "too long" or just "a lot longer than some of the others". BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 14:46, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split?
Category talk:Tourist attractions in England by locality

message: I have been going through the County categories unlinking the articles that appear twice. These have been mainly the ones appearing under the sub-sub-category Historic Houses. in doing so, I discovered that this top category was inconsistant with the way it was treating Cities, so I had a tidy up.
This category level now consists of 
* Visitor attractions in the Ceremonial Counties.
* Visitor attractions in some Cities.
* Visitor attractions in multi-county districts.
The last two have a See also link in their appropriate County section.
All I have done is move sub-categories around to make the entries all the same, I have not added or deleted. This can be taken further. eg Should some Cities have their own section at this level, why not all Cities? Some Counties have "Museums" as a sub category, should we give all Counties the same sub categories? etc.  I just want to gauge the level of interest.  MortimerCat 15:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Neo soul singers

message: Aaliyah is a neo soul singer?
Based on the definition I do not know why Aaliyah is not even placed on the list? Besides her official Myspace page says she is.
 
I really do not think so at all.  No disrespect to her, she had a great voice, but she was more mainstrem R & B.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.203.68.45 (talk) 16:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever wrote this list forgot about Lynden David Hall. He is defiantly part of the neosoul scene--skiguy06880 15:49, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Phaser (effect)

message: Please make very sure about the differences between phasers and flangers.  The "tape-flanging" effect, for instance, would seem to involve only a delay or varying delay; not a phase shift of different frequencies. — Omegatron 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed many references to flanging in the text, they're irrelevant here. The difference between flangers are phasers are described in Flanging, I added reference to that section. scoofy 14:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm removing an external link to a company selling products. The user has no name and has only ever made edits to link wikipedia pages to the company's product page. 
Lunchworthy (talk) 22:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing External Link to sales page 

message: "A phaser is an audio signal processing technique used to filter a signal by creating...For this purpose, phasers usually include a low-frequency oscillator"
The above two sentences don't seem to match up. Surely the audio signal processing technique is called "phasing" and the box of tricks used to achieve the effect is a "phaser"? In fact this interpretation fits in with the next section where it says "The electronic phasing effect is created by..." and then "The definition of phaser typically excludes such devices where... Later in the article it then says "Phasing is a popular effect for electric guitar" It would appear that this article is misnamed anyway and should called Phasing to match up with the Flanging article - as it is it's a bit of a dog's dinner. Richerman   (talk) 11:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phaser or phasing? 

message: The article doesn't clarify what is actually modulated. Especially the first two sentences:
A phaser is an electronic sound processor used to filter a signal by creating a series of peaks and troughs in the frequency spectrum. The position of the peaks and troughs of the waveform being affected is typically modulated so that they vary over time, creating a sweeping effect. For this purpose, phasers usually include a low-frequency oscillator.
The first sentence says about modulation in the frequency domain, but the second mentions waveform, which suggests the time domain.
Is the pole frequency of the all-pass filter modulated? Of only one or all of them?
Perhaps it would be useful to write it clearly and explicitly in the section showing the diagram of the effect.2A01:CB15:1C7:DD00:EA2A:EAFF:FE29:C9BC (talk) 19:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modulation
Talk:Flag of Cape Town

message: I've looked online for information about the logo that this article claims as the city's official flag. It seems to have been used between 1997 and about 2003, then replaced, and the replacement logo was again replaced in 2014. See https://flagspot.net/flags/za-wc-ct.html for some details. Zaian (talk) 15:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some background 
Talk:Piano Sonata No. 6 (Scriabin)

message: If my count some years ago was accurate, it has 386 bars. I'd like to make some samples of themes of this work and a few other Scriabin sonatas, preludes and etudes (esp. the sonatas, for possible formal analysis or just placement of oneself in a piece), but the fact that the copyright may have descended if not to Dover then to whoever now owns Muzyka's copyrights (and that would be!) prevents, of course. Will write Dover first, though... Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note : IMSLP provides access to the first-edition scores which are well out of copyright, though it's been 17 years :) ELSchissel (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Themes

message: Someone should rewrite or delete this article, its mostly opinionated things regarding emotions felt during listening, not an actual description of the piece or its construction.
:Please sign your posts on talk pages per Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. Thanks! Hyacinth (talk) 17:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite: NPOV

message: The proclamation that the Seventh Sonata precedes the Sixth contradicts the former's own Wikipedia entry, which claims Scriabin wrote the Seventh in response to the Sixth's demonic qualities.  Ashkenazy's liner notes are cited, as they are here.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.173.239.3 (talk) 01:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite true. Ashkenazy's liner notes are full of odd statements though. I will consult Taub's liner notes and see what should be fixed. --Steerpike (talk) 16:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ... Please no. Instead of relying on program notes, surely someone has seen the almost-complete autographs or an edition based on them. Primary sources are possible here, so are preferable! ELSchissel (talk) 21:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Someone seems to have gone to the trouble of assigning keys to the at most locally-tonal (so to speak) sonatas 5-10, which is one of those efforts that provokes the question "Why??" The works are none of them centered overall on a key, these keys applying at most, afaik, to the last few bars of each- which is getting things donkey backwards (keys of large-scale works are usually assigned from the tonal centers of the early sections of the work (for multi-movement works) and considerations of how the chords relate to each other (when this applies), but not its concluding bars, or else has anyone referred to Mahler's 7th symphony in C or 9th symphony in D-flat recently?... edit: or perhaps better example, Allan Pettersson's symphony no.13 in, no doubt, D-flat, or his symphony 15 in F-sharp major (which chord it ends on, in the middle of a C major scale). Again, though those works are not fully non-tonal, no one would think of assigning keys to them, either- oh, wait.) ELSchissel (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "although it is sometimes listed as being in the key of G."
Talk:René Clausen

message: This article needs pictures. The article contains links to websites that have pictures of him. I don't know how to get them on the site but if someone could do it for me or explain to me how to do it, that would be awesome! User:wittj
:We aren't able to simply take pictures from most websites and put them in Wikipedia articles. Why? Copyrights. Copyrighted material can't appear on Wikipedia. --MatthewUND(talk) 00:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: pictures

message: This section's wording is a little stilted, and, as a result, the text is misleading. Use of tone clusters does not necessarily blur the lines of tonality; in Ives' psalm settings it does, but Clausen's collections are usually diatonic pitch-class sets, so they only reinforce a key area. Moreover, when you take into account the outer-voice leading, local modulations (there are often a few), the context of the surrounding measures, and so on, you find that Clausen folds his washes quite well into an entirely tonal setting. He's an exemplar of post-Whitacre choral writing, and quite good at it; let's not make him out to be a composer he's not.—The Realms of Gold (talk) 16:53, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears as though this article may contain original research. At any rate, more citations are needed for each section. The appropriate template messages have been added to the article. Msoul13 (talk) 20:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition style?
Talk:Eridge railway station

message: I'm unsure of the number of platforms at Eridge and other stations on the branch. Could someone please verify these? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.239.106 (talk • contribs) 
:4 at Eridge, only 2 in use. Pickle 19:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platforms 

message: I've removed the link to the commercial website for the Huntsman public house: the rules regarding spam on Wikipedia are quite clear: "[a]dding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam."  Dom Kaos (talk) 14:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just removed the same link again - if anyone feels there is a valid reason to re-add it (i.e. that the addition is not merely for promotional purposes) please discuss it here first, so that some consensus can be reached  Dom Kaos (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of spam link
Talk:David Gaiman

message: I propose that "In 1986 the company had become a major supplier of vitamins, with 9 employees and an annual turnover of over £263,000" should read
"In 1986 the company had 9 employees and an annual turnover of over £263,000" since a) the event did not happen in just one year and b) neither of the statistics quoted support the assertion of "major supplier" - in fact these are quite average numbers for a specialist retailer/manufacturer in the food supplement business.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.130.17 (talk) 08:05, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsubstantiated superlative and sloppy writing 