lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wiener Zeitung

message: :Programmierung einer Suchmaschine zum Finden direkten toten Blutsverwandschaft 
  
  *Hiermit wird bekundet, dass alle 16 Ururgrosseltern, 8 Urgrosseltern, 4 Grosseltern, 2 Eltern in der Zeit von 1872 bis 2007 verstorben sind. 
  *Es gibt nur zwei direkte Alleinerben Sohn und Tochter. 
  *Im Jahr 2007 werden diese beiden Alleinerben, die Erben sämtlichen Vermögens aus den Jahren 1872 bis 2007.
  *Jeder der heute lebt, hat diese biologischen Konstante 16 8 4 2. 
  *Ohne diese biologische Konstante existiert der Erbe nicht.
  *Das Problem ist, der Erbe muss 30 mal geerbt haben in der Zeit von 1871 bis 2007.
  *Der Erbe hat aber statt 30 mal, Null mal geerbt.
http://www.wienerzeitung.at/DesktopDefault.aspx?TabID=3924&Alias=wzo&cob=310070 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.237.32.178 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anzeige der Toten Familienmitglieder 1871 bis 2007
Talk:Better Than Life (Red Dwarf episode)

message: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:
1. Referencing and citation: pass 
2. Coverage and accuracy: pass 
3. Structure: pass
4. Grammar: pass 
5. Supporting materials: pass 
Nreive (talk) 15:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Do historical errors belong here?
When Rimmer gets Napoleon's autograph, Napoleon writes with his right hand, when he was in fact left handed.
ThePizzaKing (talk) 02:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that would be regarded as trivia, which is discouraged under Wikipedia guidelines. Nreive (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Error
Talk:National Curriculum and Textbook Board

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.banglapedia.org/httpdocs/HT/N_0090.HTM. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 02:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:List of Judges of the United States Tax Court

message: Other judge names that come up in case law searches include:
*Judge Disney
*Judge Tannenwald
bd2412 T 04:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional judges

message: In light of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman H. Wolfe, I propose to move this article to United States Tax Court judge and expand the introductory materials so as to make it an article generally describing the qualifications and duties of the position. The existing list of judges would be retained as an embedded list within the article. Are there any objections to this proposal? bd2412 T 16:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Category talk:Drilling rig operators

message: Is it ok to include former operators in this category that have merged or no longer exist? Orniphobe (talk) 16:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Why Maersk Drilling is not on the list?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.163.248.12 (talk) 11:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maersk Drilling
Talk:Nijinsky (film)

message: Is it right for two of the pieces in the soundtrack section to be listed as Le Spectre de la and  Rose by Carl Maria von Weber and L'Après-midi d'un faune by Claude Debussy?  The pieces of music themselves are called 'Invitation to the Dance' and ' Prelude à l'Après-midi d'un faune ', whereas it is the ballets based on these pieces of music that have the names given in the article.  It seems to me that when talking about a soundtrack, one should name the pieces of music rather than the ballet as a whole.  What does everyone else think?  J.Gowers (talk) 11:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack 

message: His character, mentioned in the Principal Cast section, has a link to a wikipedia article on, a Nicolas de Gunzberg .... who was born in 1904, and thus would be only 9 years old when he is supposedly funding the Ballets Russes and gossiping with Nijinsky. So ... I am tempted to edit out that linkage. 71.176.128.94 (talk) 05:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baron de Gunzberg
Talk:Jack (band)

message: I am shocked that no band page exists for Jack. They were very prominent in the music press around 1996-7, released several singles and albums that were high in the indie charts.
I will endeavour to tidy up the page, get sources and put together a discography.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmcq (talk • contribs) 16:30, 10 December 2007
:Somebody created a stub article about them back in November of 2006, but it was eventually deleted as having no evidence of notability. --Orange Mike  | Talk 16:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll leave this page here for now, but we need to add some actual info - album names, awards, whatever - within a few days. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  They released at least three albums under reasonably well-known independent record labels, so they do appear to meet the notability requirements of WP:MUSIC. I added a partial discography. --Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Stasis Leak

message: : "Holly (Norman Lovett) detects a stasis leak on Level 16."
I can't find any piece of dialogue in the episode that remotely suggests this. In fact, the episode seems to make it clear that Holly doesn't even know what a stasis leak is, never mind how to detect one, and maybe this is supposition in and of itself, but it looks like the stasis leak being discovered is a time paradox where Rimmer writes in his diary that his future self's head comes through the table and mentions the stasis leak, and Rimmer comes to inform him about his stasis leak because Lister reads about what Rimmer brushed aside as a hallucination in Rimmer's diary after Lister finds the photo of Kochanski.
: Lister: Listen to what it said. It says: [reading Rimmer's diary] "The head came through the table and said, 'I'm from the future. I've come to save your life. We found a stasis leak on Floor 16.'" You see, I don't think it was an hallucination.
: Rimmer: What's a stasis leak?
: Holly: Alright, dudes? What's going down in Groovetown, then?
: Lister: Alright, Hol? Listen, what's a stasis leak?
: Holly: Oooh, well, very, very, basically, putting it as simply as I can for your average layman to comprehend. A stasis leak is a leak, right? In stasis. Hence the name, a stasis leak.
: Lister: You don't know, do you, Hol?
: Holly: No, I don't.
: Lister: Well I suggest we go down to Floor 16 and see what's there.
: Rimmer: How come he never, ever knows anything? He's supposed to have an IQ of 6000.
: Holly: 6000's not that much. It's only the same IQ as twelve thousand car park attendants.
: Rimmer: But you don't know anything.
: Holly: Listen, I happen to be one of the sleekest, most sophisticated computers ever devised by man. I am the nearest thing you can get to infullible.
: Lister: Infallible.
: Holly: Exactly.
Was the original assertion about Holly pointed out in the secondary source Red Dwarf Programme Guide or something? TardisTybort (talk) 01:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Holly detects a stasis leak"
Talk:Far darrig

message: Is this faerie the same thing as a "red cap"? Red caps were notorious for killing people.
Not according to the Laurell K. Hamilton series of Merry Gentry.  In the Hamilton series, they are a cursed, stand-alone type of creature.  Cursed in the way of no individual names nor females (thus no children, killing off the race entirely if they die) until a Queen crowned by Faerie itself gives them a name.  Also, in this series, the Red Caps are a part of the Goblin culture--only the strongest are able to keep their caps flowing with blood.----CBB1430
I concur, though I don't particularly like using a contemporary book of fiction as a source, as the author's goal is to entertain. In every source I've so far read on the matter, it seems like the fear dearg simply likes wearing red clothing, whereas the redcap "dyes" its clothing using human blood. I've been looking into any possible connections, however. Overall, it seems like the fear dearg is slightly less malevolent. --RPhilbrook (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:2008 UCI Track Cycling World Championships

message: The intro mentions that 3 World Records were broken yet the times listed for the events only show 2 new WR's (mens and ladies team pursuit). Any idea what the other WR is? brob (talk) 11:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, female team sprint world record was broken in qualifying. I will, one day, get round to making pages for each event. SeveroTC 14:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 world records 

message: The file :c:File:2008 UCI Track Cycling World Championships – Women's scratch.jpg used in this article has been deleted from Commons
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 07:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: File Deleted from Commons
Talk:Bengal Film Journalists' Association Awards

message: The website bfjaaward.com, which is the source for most of this and derived articles, no longer appears to have existed as an Bengal awards website after 2015. (Currently it is a primarily Spanish language website on general film topics.) 
Therefore all the information we can get comes from discontinuous archives. JSory (talk) 01:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  BFJAA Website is No Longer Searchable
Talk:The Rolling Stones' Tour of the Americas '75

message: Did Nicky Hopkins play on this tour?  The photographer of this set in Flickr specifically notes Hopkins as pianist next to Billy Preston in this photo in the set:  --Leahtwosaints (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I placed a photo of the band-question though
Talk:Breeders' Cup Turf Sprint

message: Most tracks with turf course can go more than 6.5 furlongs, so I think it should not be "longer than". But the reference to Belmont appears to show that Belmont never has turf races at 6.5 furlongs! And how do we know that there aren't other tracks that run at 6.5 furlongs on the turf? Sddoc (talk) 07:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Besides Santa Anita, the only tracks in North America capable of contesting longer than six and 1/2 furlong turf races are Woodbine and Belmont"
Talk:Lighthouse (Poole)

message: See discussion at Talk:Coventry#Dubious. 137.205.74.169 (talk) 12:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious statement &ndash; second largest arts centre
Talk:1991 Trinidad and Tobago general election

message: It is notable that the same day information is posted
someone critiqued the contribution
This is the beginning of a new article 
whose information is locked up ion paper format
in a library and a Election commission is not available online
Please wait for a few other indivuals to contribute 
before the great critiquers come out 
thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.94.213.42 (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion/2007 December 7

message: the discussion Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_December_7#Image:DW_Fear_Her.jpg had been closed as a complaint was made that it was diruptive, this complaint has since been withdrawn, does one resubmit the ifD, or reopen it? Fasach Nua (talk) 17:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reopening an ifD
Template talk:Tuskegee Airmen

message: The history of the 99th Aero Squadron would not be complete unless the following information is included about the origin of the unit before the US entry in WWI.  The 99th was formed as a part of the 9th Calvary when they were deployed after Pancho Villa in 1916 along the Texas/New Mexico border.  The 99th adopted the buffalo from the "Buffalo Soldiers" of the 9th Calvary.
In 1917 the unit was formed as part of the Allied Expeditionary Force to deploy to Europe with other aviation units such as the 94th, 95th and 96th Aero Squadrons.
My grandfather Floyd E. Bland was a mechanic in the 99th Aero Squadron in 1917.  The aircraft were Standards, the same ones used by General Pershing as reconnaissance aircraft in Texas and New Mexico the year before.
I have a photograph of the pilots and another one of the complete unit taken at Treasure Island near San Francisco, California in 1917.  My grandfather is in the photo.  All of the members of the 99th during this time were white, the unit supported the 9th Calvary which was African American.
After the Armistice in 1918 the unit was disbanded.  It was reformed in 1941 in Rantoul Illinois as the first all black aviation unit.
Gene Bland
moved comment from subpage. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 10:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Burt Metcalfe

message: These personal comments were added to the article : 07:02, 5 February 2009 Gaeton (Talk | contribs)
I was a WWII veteran when I enrolled as a graduate student in Theater Arts at UCLA in 1950.  Burt Metcalfe was a non-vet undergraduate in Theater Arts and a classmate some time between 1950 and 1953 when I received my MA and moved to New York City.
I presume good faith, but personal recollection is not appropriate for a biographical article, so removed. 71.164.104.203 (talk) 04:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: personal

message: Just saying that he was born in Saskatchewan is like saying someone was born in Wyoming. Not very specific. What town or city was he born in? 68.146.233.86 (talk) 13:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we be more specific as to birthplace?

message: It's listed as "Toby Harry Shipman" when all other sites list "Tobey HONEY Shipman" 2601:18C:8382:B30:4EF:F3DD:E1D7:44D4 (talk) 19:59, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What are those other sites? If they are reliable, one should be added as a citation. I just inserted a "Citation needed" template because the cited article from The Hollywood Reporter does not mention "Toby Harry Shipman" or "Tobey HONEY Shipman" (or Toby Honey Richman, which is the name in the article as I write this reply. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:03, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Previous Spouse
Talk:It Goes Like It Goes

message: I'm going to tag this article for non-neutral POV because of the last phrase in the following sentence:I have similarly tagged the "Rainbow Connection" article and thoroughly explained my reasons on its talk page: Talk:Rainbow Connection#NPOV. In order to avoid duplicate discussions, I refer editors to that talk page.—Jim10701 (talk) 04:31, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm removing the tag, per my comment at Talk:Rainbow Connection#NPOV. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Naval Outlying Landing Field Coupeville

message: Photo captions are a little redundant, don't you think? I believe we got the gist of the airfield "being for touch and go practice landings" after the first few times we read it..45Colt 17:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

message: I started a history section and before I could even add anything,  immediately,  within 4  minutes (!!!) reverts with sharp words : No - a section needs to be more than a sentence.
 With all due respect, these are WP:good faith and no vandal edits, gimme a break! this page NEEDS a history section. FYI I am adding some content, adding form not just copy editing, but might reconsider with 's hostile attitude. He forgot there's a policy to welcome new editors to a page...
--Wuerzele (talk) 05:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: With thousands of edits to your credit, you're hardly a new editor, Wuerzele, so why would I "welcome" you?  My edit summary was hostile?  Nowhere near hostile.  Most seasoned editors actually expand a section in one swoop, not put in one sentence and call it a section.  There was no indication I could ascertain that indicated you were going to expand the section.  Your edits didn't look like vandalism to me (and I never indicated I was seeing anything resembling vandalism (so why you would even mention vandalism is anyone's guess), but they did look poorly executed and not in the best interest of an encyclopedia article.  My advice: knock off the personal attacks and attitude.  A good start that direction would be collegial editing and cutting back on the drama. -- WV ● ✉ ✓  05:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whoa- do what you preach.  How about you knock off your attitude and personal attacks and stop edit warring. So far you 've not contributed ONE shred of evidence to the contrary I have a source that stated what I added and it stays there. You can ADD if you like. Do not remove sourced info.You dont even seem to know the WP rules: of course one welcomes NEW EDITORS to a site! --Wuerzele (talk) 07:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  history section 

message: I appreciate WikiLevi's edits and ask they remain please.  I'm not the one going edit war here.  Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JosefAbraham (talk • contribs) 18:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing this page
Talk:Lorraine (given name)

message: citation from the article:
"The name is of French origin, and is above all in the United States and Canada, after World War I, during which events brought Lorraine, France to the North American public imagination." What? By all means i can't figure out what that sentence wants to tell me. I think some clarification could dramatically increase the quality of this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.113.34 (talk) 11:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The usage and topic of Lorraine is under discussion, see Talk:Lorraine (duchy) -- 70.51.200.135 (talk) 05:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Lorraine"
Talk:Karelian Birch (Fabergé egg)

message: a private collector .... donated it to the State Historical Museum. The complete donation, which cost the museum "millions of dollars"....
Surely if the museum paid for it, it can't be considered a donation? 86.155.207.81 (talk) 17:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the same thing as well, but the Forbes article states "The egg itself was recently donated by a private, unnamed owner to the Russian National Museum." It might just be a terminology thing for museums to refer to all contributions as "donations". --Hemlock Martinis (talk) 17:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It didn't make sense to me either. I was bold and changed "donated" to "sold" and "donation" to "purchase". — Kpalion(talk) 21:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Donation?

message: (cur | prev) 05:14, 25 October 2012‎ MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (4,567 bytes) (0)‎ . . (MaybeMaybeMaybe moved page Karelian Birch (Fabergé egg) to Karelian Birch) (undo | thank) 
:This wasn't a good move, readers and books often capitalize plant names. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Karelian birch]]

message: An editor wrote this in the body of the article, right after "The egg remained in the palace until it was looted in the wake of the October Revolution later that year." I'm moving it here.
I don't have an opinion on the matter. I marked it as disputed in the article. Herostratus (talk) 03:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where the egg was sent 
Talk:Clearbrook Human Service Agency

message: Clearbrook is a major agency for human services in Illinois. There are many articles in publications such as The Chicago Tribune, etc. These will be cited.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.36.2  (talk • contribs) 
:Excellent.  Please provide those post-haste to establish notability.  If such sources can be furnished, I would see no more problems with keeping this article.  --Jayron32|talk|contribs 17:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:13th Cavalry Regiment (United States)

message: I went to look for it, and it wasn't created. My great uncle served in the 13th in the early 1910's, and if anyone with current Army knowledge about the 1-13 Armor could help beef this up and correct what I added, please do! Monsieurdl (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start of 13th Cavalry
Talk:Yucca Airstrip

message: According to the official source the FAA id NV11 has been reassigned to the helipad at Owyhee Hospital.
see https://adip.faa.gov/agis/public/#/public 93.231.239.91 (talk) 04:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: KUCC is also not listed in the current DOC 9101 of ICAO, so this is not a valid ICAO code. 93.231.239.91 (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAA designator NV11 has been reassigned
Talk:1922 Picardie mid-air collision

message: The ref to aviastar was removed as contributory infringement per WP:EL, yet without indication of what source work is said to be infringed. If there's a track record of such infringement at that site, a link would be helpful. The site lists an extensive bibliography, though it does not provide citations on its individual articles. The most obviously related book in the list would be:
:Jackson, Aubrey Joseph. De Havilland Aircraft since 1909 London: Putnam (1987)  
If someone can check that book it would be helpful. WorldCat shows it as fairly widely held in libraries. User:LeadSongDog come howl 13:41, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aviastar 

message: Nice to see we have an article on this important early accident. What is missing is the cause and the changes made to air navigation rules afterwards.
As I understand it, both aircraft were following a road or railway line for navigation. The British aircraft was keeping to the left of the feature, and the French aircraft was keeping to the right, thus placing them both on the same side of the road/railway going in opposite directions. As a direct result of the accident, the rule was adapted from maritime practice of "pass port-to-port", or keeping a road or railway to one's left when following it as a navigational aid. I'm sure I've read this in a book on aviation accidents, but am not sure which one. If anyone can reference this before I can find the source, please add it to the article. Mjroots (talk) 09:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I managed to find a ref for this by accident, now added to the article. Mjroots (talk) 06:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause and effect

message: This article needs a new title as "first mid-air collision of airliners" does not follow the system for the rest of aircraft incidents without flight numbers. I would suggest something like "Mid-air collision of 7 April 1922" or "Picardie mid-air collision" or some variation thereof. -Noha307 (talk) 21:37, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason why it cant be an exception for what was a first. MilborneOne (talk) 22:31, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Article Title 