Talk:September 9

message: The entry about the end of the Greek-Turkish war in 1922 was a fanatical POV. What is considered as "saved by the Turks", can equally be described by the non-Turks (Greeks, Armenians, etc.) as "burned to ashes by the Turks". The burning of the city and fleeing of the non-turkic population is indisputable. --Spryom 10:20, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Greek-Turkish war

message: The Declaration of Independence is considered the point where the US became a country.  That document in fact, makes use of the name "United States of America".  Offically then, the US became a nation on July 4, 1776 as the United States of America.  Congress may have made the name official at some later date, but our nationhood is dated from the Declaration, not the Constitution.
:Not according to historical accounts. 1776-07-04 was the day of independence for the United States, but it (they) didn't become a full-fledged country with a working government until the Continental Congress drew up and ratified the Articles of Confederation. — Loadmaster (talk) 04:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1776 - US becomes a country 

message: Would it be reasonable to add an item for 9/9/9 (09/09/09), a date that has some significance to numerologists ? — Loadmaster (talk) 20:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really an event of great historical importance FoxNews and certainly the Metro are not news sources of record. Anyway it is 09/09/2009. -- Drappel (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  So you're okay with completely ignoring the perceived importance of 9/9/9 held by many numerologists because you don't like the sources that reported it? — Loadmaster (talk) 04:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I think it is superstitious nonsense, but accept the right of people to believe what they will. However my personal feelings aside if there was a Wikipedia article of sufficient standard, cited with information that have been published by reliable sources showing the event was of global notability over time (which right now due to being without regard to long-term historical perspective it can't be) then I would leave the objection to the linking of such an article to other people since, in my opinion which you asked for, I openly admit that I think it is unworthy of listing. -- Drappel (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Perceived importance" is insufficient to warrant inclusion in the date article.  Perceived by whom?  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 18:28, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  9/9/9 

message: Would anybody mind if I put in an entry for the Café Hillel bombing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.17.95.201 (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cafe Hillel Bombing 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on September 9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121209211756/http://www1.sympatico.ca/cgi-bin/on_this_day?mth=Sep&day=09 to http://www1.sympatico.ca/cgi-bin/on_this_day?mth=Sep&day=09
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: The entry "Treznea Massacre in Transylvania" is missing a period. 98.210.124.96 (talk) 00:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2019 

message: the linked article, which is not primarily about them, calls them Constance and Her Companions, 142.163.195.225 (talk) 14:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  holidays and observances Constance nun and companions