lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gionbō

message: What is this? I do not know such wagashi. Please show a source or teach spelling in Japanese language for investigation. Thanks. --Nightshadow28 13:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I posted a thread to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan#Does anyone know? for this article. If someone know about Ginbō, please join a discussion there. --Nightshadow28 (talk) 03:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please forget a misspelling in edit summary... --Nightshadow28 (talk) 03:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax?
Talk:List of American films of 1980

message: Was doing some film lists cleanup (1980 & 1985), and found that the IMDb link was "broken" (Error 404), due to changes in the website's directory and search-filtering structure. 
 
Someone active in the "Cinema of the U.S."/Culture Portal might wish to check all the other Year lists for correct IMDb link parsing, and either cut & paste my corrected link (merely substituting the correct 4-digit year in the URL) into each page, or go through the trouble of a "narrowed down" search entry on the IMDb site to copy a corrected link. — DennisDallas (talk) 08:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links &mdash; new IMDb URL parsing
Talk:Railteam

message: It doesn't make sense to place an expansion tag on this article; Railteam was announced only about two weeks ago and hasn't yet begun joint operations so it makes sense that there is little to say about it at this point. Classifying it as a stub that needs to be expanded is sufficient.--Gloriamarie 23:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion tag is silly

message: The article says:
"Railteam plans to increase high-speed rail passengers from 15 million a year currently to 25 million by 2010."  
This implies a stunningly low number of passengers.  After all, Eurostar alone already carries 8m passengers a year, which implies that all other services in Europe combined are currently only transporting 2m passengers a hear.  Sure this is nonsense, even it is only counting international travellers. Simhedges (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Passenger Numbers

message: Can anybody please update the article with the logo of 2010?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hybirdd (talk • contribs) 18:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you show us what it looks like?  —fudoreaper (talk) 03:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logo 

message: There is reference to 2010 as being in the future and the website provided returns "403 forbidden" - does this article still reflect reality in any way?  Hobbitschuster (talk) 13:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Railteam still exists, and to me its members and goals are still the same, so yes it does reflect reality. Slasher-fun (talk) 21:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: But 2010 is not in the future any more and the website deadlinks... Hobbitschuster (talk) 16:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Website is still perfectly fine with me, you may want to check if your DNS are working correctly, I'm restoring the link. Slasher-fun (talk) 16:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, now it works. Don't know what happened. Probably a problem with mobile... Hobbitschuster (talk) 20:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  outdated - website deadlinks
Talk:Wuxi

message: The Google Maps coordinates for Wuxi are incorrect. That location is near Fuzhou in Fujian Province. Wuxi is nowhere near there. Someone please correct this.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.244.56.120 (talk) 07:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article does not deliver encyclopedic English; although the attempt was good, there is still too much subtle Chinglish in evidence. Further, it reads a bit like some semi-propagandist/travel booklet piece. This is particularly bad in view that there are no proper references or citations to be found -- nothing is backed up! IMO, this entry needs considerable revision.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.219.6.120 (talk) 15:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the Beef? 

message: The red dot locating Wuxi on the map is erroneously in Fujian. kwami (talk) 02:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  error 

message: should some mention be made of the 2018 wuxi fencing world championships?
PawnPusher1536 (talk) 23:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  fencing world championships? 

message: Wuxi literally means "the capital of Wu (state)."
What? 吴 and 无 are totally different characters. Is this a theory that I was not previously aware of, a linguistic distortion (e.g. originally containing 吴 in the name, but shifted over time?), or a complete fabrication? F1anders (talk) 02:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:William I

message: These entries appear to be sorted willy-nilly. Shouldn't they be alphabetized based on the "of X" part? — Brian (talk) 14:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Either that, or by chronology. 112.211.205.112 (talk) 15:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorting

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
:William I (disambiguation) →  – At present "William I" redirects to William the Conqueror, I would argue that this is anglocentric bias.  Firstly, the sheer number of entries on this list should make us cautious about deciding that there is a primary topic.  Secondly, we also have William I, German Emperor, under who the unification of Germany took place, plus important kings of the Netherlands and Scotland. PatGallacher (talk) 17:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? PatGallacher (talk) 13:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: His article gets the most views and has the most historical significance. Rreagan007 (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not enough for it to be a primary redirect. The article would need to be more likely to be sought under this name then all others taken together. And it's not. Andrewa (talk) 10:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Royalty and Nobility has been notified of this discussion. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Even WP:NCROY uses this article as an example of royalty articles that should be titled as their most common name. Rreagan007 (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Then I think you might mean that you oppose this proposal, as supporting this proposal means that you think that "William I" should not redirect to William the Conqueror. Rreagan007 (talk) 18:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Support: Current setup is needlessly Anglocentric. Besides William the Conqueror and William I, German Emperor, there's also William the Silent, who I don't think has been mentioned but was also a William I (although rarely referred to as such). Especially since "William the Conqueror" is more common than "William I (of England)", I don't think he's the clear primary topic for this title. 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 20:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 August 2023
Talk:Manifest file

message: I replaced a long-winded page which basically duplicated some Java documentation about JAR files with a short stub about the term's meaning in general computing.  I reviewed the pages which link here, and a good number of them do so in the context which the page now documents, not its specific use in JAR files (although there are links of that kind as well; but I think they work acceptably with the new contents, too).  If you nevertheless think that was misdirected, please add a note here so we can discuss.  Thanks.-- era (Talk | History) 20:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

message: *"To learn more about digests and signing, see the Signing and Authenticating JAR Files lesson." -> unauthorized copy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.198.63 (talk • contribs) 15:11 UTC, 4 July 2007
**I was going to say it's a clearly written article, but it does indeed look like they copied most of the article straight from Sun's site --IByte (talk) 09:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments for the old Java-specific version

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.manifest is the same.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.253.225.222 (talk) 05:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: integrated with .manifest
Talk:List of American films of 1992

message: I saw aposter of a movie named Size 36
But im nt able to search it on net
Its abt a man who looks after a girl and he tries to seduce her as she grows into her puberty  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.111.31.186 (talk) 10:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The film 36 Fillette can be found on the List of French films of 1988, which this isn't. ―cobaltcigs 10:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a movie names Size36
Talk:Mhalsa

message: There are three articles on mahalasa. The other two are named mhalasa and shree Mahalasa. I am going to attempt to merge all 3 in this article. I am not sure what to do next. But somebody can help me with that later. I am going to add information and photos of the temple as well. --Kaveri 14:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging three articles on Mahalasa 

message: Hello, i think this page should be renamed to Mhalsa. In sanskrit it is Mhāḷasā. Same goes for Marathi language, and all other languages. I have no idea where did this "Mahalasa" came up from. It gets pronounced as "Mahāḷasā" and not Mhāḷasā. If nobody objects to this in one week, i might remane the page "boldly".
What are your opinions ? —usernamekiran (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: * I will wait for 3 days more, making it 10 days. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the confusion is because you are mixing two different figures because of similar names. Mhalasa ie Mahalasa Narayani is a goddess in Goa in the Vaishnava tradition, hence the Narayani part added to the name. Mhalasa connected to Khandoba is clearly Shaivite. She is definitely not Mahalasa. Putting both these in one is creating confusion. Putting image and information as if it is one entity is misleading. Is there a possibility to separate the two pages and create Mhalasa disambiguation page may be? Sorry for not responding  to your earlier request before. I was on a long hiatus. Kaveri (talk) 11:25, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving page (renaming)
Talk:Childhood friend

message: Childhood friend redirects to Moe (slang)? Is this appropriate? -- • Kurt Guirnela • ‡ Talk 14:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it isn't. Now redirecting to Friendship instead. VDZ (talk) 17:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Childhood friend -> Moe (slang)
Talk:Sneads High School

message: I am a current student at Sneads High School and I have to say that this school sucks Huge Balls. Never put your child in public school because it is schools like Sneads High School that make children stupid. Just kidding I love Sneads. Even though we are a small school we have many teachers who always go the extra mile just to help their students.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.176.81.226 (talk) 19:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Students
Talk:List of American films of 1991

message: I'm removing an entry in the table called "Sucking cock can be quite fun on Tuesdays." There is no reference for this and I can't find it on IMDB, so I'm assuming it's vandalism. If anyone can find a reference, please revert my edit and add the reference. Pdcook (talk) 03:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism?
Talk:AFL Mackay

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.foxsportspulse.com/assoc_page.cgi?client=1-3483-0-87429-0&sID=53460&&news_task=DETAIL&articleID=7847232. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Mdann52talk to me! 14:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:List of American films of 2004

message: The 'highest grossing films' table is displayed under the January-March section, although in the page source it's correctly above that section. I guess it's a wiki rendering issue ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F0E:305:8400:A120:78D2:D6A2:3A54 (talk) 11:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Talk:AFL Capricornia

message: who ever dose the photos fo this page can you please change it to the league logo. it seems abit unfair to have one teams jumper used when there are six teams in the league.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.7.59.235 (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

message: For all contributors. You need sources for the information provided. The corrections I have provided are derived from the Morning Bulletin. If you want cites I will try and find them. Footy Freak7 (talk) 07:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, what is the Morning Bulletin. Secondly, this article desperately needs references. Can you add them for your content please? HiLo48 (talk) 07:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Morning Bulletin is Rockhampton's daily newspaper. I can't cite the refs properly yet. That's why I didn't add them. But it's all from the paper. Footy Freak7 (talk) 11:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

text:  Okay I just added a simple ref for now in the heading of the premierships list. Hope that's allowed. Footy Freak7 (talk) 11:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I reckon it's more than allowed. It's great. Clearly you're putting a lot of work into some excellent good faith edits here. Some pedants from elsewhere will be keen to see formal referencing asap (I guess I'm one of them), and if you can't do it yourself, any hints you can give about your real sources may help others turn them into good references. HiLo48 (talk) 20:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important
Talk:La Libération de Paris

message: pfff, you americans have no idea to what happened in france from 1940 to 1944. your view is based on US/UK biaised and German propaganda. you don't have a mere english article about the french resistance battles called maquis, in the Vercors and the Glières. nothing about the vichy france milice and SS and LVF fighting the russians in the eastern front, and the allies in africa. you don't have a clue and developed a myth. sorry to ruin that myth. the german are even worse, they don't have an article for Leclerc's famous division nor the famous Battle of Bir Hakeim... Paris By Night 15:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: references tag...
Talk:Evil Horde

message: Mattel's Evil Horde toys also included a robot monster called "Monstroid."   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.239.78 (talk) 05:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monstroid 

message: There was a rock-like member of the evil Horde from a flashback episode of the Mike Young series, he says something that annoys Hordak. Hordak destroys him. Also, Hordak's sorcerors, who were male versions of the Filmation Shadow Weaver character.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.239.78 (talk) 05:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a montage of all the characters from the Horde would be better than the Horde logo.--NeilEvans 23:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Member from the newer cartoon series 

message: I believe Horde Trooper should be merged into this article I see little that makes its stand out on its own and it.
Dwanyewest (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need of a merger
Talk:Shepherd's Bush railway station

message: The reason for the merger is that these are going to become an interchange. However, should the name change as well? Simply south 15:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it should have they both should fall under Shepherd's Bush station, but with specific headings for the Tube and train stations... D-Notice 16:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The stations aren't going to part of a single station complex, and it's not clear how direct the interchange will be, so I'd say keeping them separate is correct. --82.45.163.4 19:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hammersmith has two separate articles, so logically these two should be separate too. LondonStatto 21:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

text:  Maintain separately; TfL have taken to calling stations which are 'close walking distance' apart "interchange" stations, as opposed to the former meaning of "stations you don't have to exit the system to change lines". If they later turn out to have share a single entrance (like, eg. Wimbledon or Highbury & Islington) then convert to a single article. --AlisonW 18:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll remove the merge until a future date, if they join. Simply south 20:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Snake Men (Masters of the Universe)

message: There's got to be a better picture than this photo of a toy collection.  It's not a very good picture.
I suggest using the Snake Men logo instead, much like the Cobra Organization article features its logo.
:I think a montage of all the Snake Men would better illustrate the article.--NeilEvans 23:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better Images

message: Rather than delete the characters articles I feel any useful information that can be gleamed from the individual snakemen article should be merged here since they are unsourced. There doesn't seem sufficient reliable third person information that characters such as Tung Lashor, Snake Face etc are notable enough to deserve solo articles. Dwanyewest (talk) 06:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of characters (Merger Proposal)
File talk:2006megacities.PNG

message: Add Málaga as a megacity (Urban population 1,046,279).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreutznaer (talk • contribs) 12:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update for map required 

message: There are way too many dots in germany. Berlin, Hamburg, Munich and Cologne are the only cities with more than a million inhabitants. Someone confused it with the List of towns and cities with 100,000 or more inhabitants  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.190.20.41 (talk) 23:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  germany
Talk:I Guess I Like It Like That

message: "By this time, Kylie is started to become en vogue in all the clubs and suddenly, it became trendy to play her at the Haçienda. And we don't ever think when we were doing 'I Should Be So Lucky' that Kylie would have ever been played at the Haçienda."
The grammar in this "quote" is so bad, either a non-native English speaker incorrectly quoted Waterman or someone else, or the quote is completely made up. Pete Waterman would never use such poor grammar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8308:381:EE00:3586:EB55:7702:12B4 (talk) 07:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  source for the quote?
Talk:Khanates of the Caucasus

message: Today most of the khanate make up the modern Republic of Azerbaijan. I putted this in the article Baku87 (talk) 10:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Azerbaijan

message: The Khanates are from Qajar times and not Safavid times.In Safavid era they were called beglarbegies .--Alborz Fallah (talk) 11:34, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Qajar times and not Safavid times

message: can someone writ abouts the khanates i have link http://azerbaijans.com/content_376_en.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.233.27.127 (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi 

message: I didn't quite understand your reasoning for removing all the khanates south of the Aras river. Are you implying that these khanates did not exist? Could you please elaborate further? — Golden call me maybe? 12:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess this issue should be reminded 188.253.216.219 (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khanates to the south of Aras
Talk:Peki'in Synagogue

message: As of now, we have little going beyond the most superficial news scoop level.
We lack a recent source on
*the age of the two carved stone tablets (menorah and Torah shrine/Temple facade). Apparently at least the menorah is either ancient, or – medieval. Say some researchers. But I found no closer details, just a single sentence in a newspaper article. The only source we have, Segal Chiat's book, is a typed handbook published in 1982, almost 40 years ago. It is just a gazetteer (not an archaeological study), collecting data from a 1931 (!) PEFQS contribution by Eliezer Sukenik, the grandfather of Israeli archaeology, and from another gazetteer published in 1977 by  with Gottfried Reeg – both Judaists, not archaeologists, so just repeating older assessments made by others.
We lack a reliable source on
*the content of the capital inscriptions: I could only find the "provisional" reading from right after the discovery, with no concrete rendering of the text. Just some vague notion about donors. I couldn't find any IAA publication online.
*no proper dating of the capital. The IAA press release copied word by word by the press says "1800 years old", and that's always a simplification, sometimes based on a misunderstanding, hinting at either the 2nd or 3rd century. Not good enough. Having no proper IAA publication like a final report or other analysis means: we're not there yet.
*no source for the synagogue preceding the current one and allegedly destroyed in an earthquake (there had been two major tremors in the Galilee several decades earlier, in 1837 and 1856). There must have been a synagogue there for sure, the Jewish population at the time required one, but: no source.
*nothing, let alone a source, for the "medieval synagogue" mentioned as alternative possibility to an ancient one. Unless it's just a misunderstanding – or the same one as the one above, the earthquake casualty.
*no word about the possible dating of the other carved stones displayed at the synagogue. They can be seen online, for instance here. One looks like a chancel screen of a type well known from Byzantine churches, but the carved lion could well be from a Torah Ark.
Still a long way to go. Anyone with solutions? Cheers, Arminden (talk) 04:48, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardly anything reliable on history, dates, and inscriptions content