Talk:@Home Network

message: There is also "Tmobile @Home" which is still yet to have been craeted but when it as been... There should be an @home page.
T- disambiguation 
174.250.210.59 (talk)→  — Preceding undated comment added 12:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-Mobile 

message: The article @Home was redirecting to the Excite article.  However, in reviewing both articles, it appears that it should instead redirect here to @Home Network.  I changed the @Home redirect to point here. Dugwiki 17:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sort of, Excite was 2 weeks from missing payroll and they were owned by Kleiner Perkins & Caufield, just like @Home Networks. This cash and non voting stock payoff was seen by insiders as away of exiting the original leadership.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.239.164.70 (talk) 23:11, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed article [[@Home]] to redirect here 

message: As part of the agreement @Home's national high-speed fiber network access would be sold back to AT&T for $307 million in cash.
When did @Home buy the AT&T network?
If my memory serves me correctly that was after AT&T acquired the lion share of voting rights in Excite@Home (From buying out TCI) and then during the bankruptcy proceedings they said they would basically take over part of the network.  no? CaribDigita 01:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe, but don't have a source to cite, that before AT&T bought TCI, @Home had AT&T build out its fibre network (@Home had an impressive network across the U.S. by the time it filed for Chapter 11).  After AT&T bought TCI and became a cable player (and thus a partner in Excite@Home), and after Excite@Home filed for bankruptcy, AT&T ended up buying back the network it had originally built and sold to @Home.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.68.38.72 (talk) 20:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct.  @Home owned a portion of the AT&T dark fiber networks.  This became an issue in the later legal cases because in 2001 the board, controlled by AT&T sold the rights back to AT&T for under market value.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.18.187.23 (talk) 07:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology?

message: The article of @Home is mostly correct, however there seems to be large parts of the story missing.  Especially what was TCI/AT&T/Comast's role in stealing @Homes intellectual assets, not paying fully for services rendered and eventually driving a potential competitor out of business.  All of this while being one of the trusted owners of the Excite@Home.  Several shareholder lawsuits that been filed and settled. Unfortunatly the true story will never be written nor those who defrauded the company will ever be proscuted.
:True, but I also think that TCI/AT&T, Comcast, Cox and the other MSOs realized collectively that the joint venture was bound to hinder the prospects of competition in future home data services--remember this was when things like VOD, VOIP, etc. were in their infancy.  Everyone, @Home included, knew back in 1999 that the writing was on the wall.  As cable operators - "old hat" RF engineers - gained expertise and experience working with "new kid" IP network engineers from @Home - they began to take more control, and everyone - including @Home - knew what was to come.  The Excite merger was an attempt to move focus away from the data network--the primary focus of company attention and investment from 1995 to 1999--to content, which as we see, certainly didn't work out too well.  Just my 2 cents. --67.68.38.72 20:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Villain???? 

message: The @Home branch in the Netherlands is to this day still operational. See this site]. The company offers internet-access, digital and analogue television and telephony services via the cable network previously owned by Essent Kabelcom.
I'm wondering how we can merge that info into this (or another) article. Any suggestions are welcome. ʍαμ$ʏ5043 16:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Dutch @Home hasn't been a branch from @Home Network for years. I'll add a paragraph about @Home Benelux BV (the full name of the @Home-branch that exists in the Netherlands). Fruggo (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  @Home in the Netherlands 

message: what happend to this? 2001:A60:1552:1301:1D50:4E0:1607:8E4B (talk) 15:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: AT HOME CORP SER A