Talk:Tulu people

message: hey there aren't any tulu christians left anywhere.most are assimilated with konkani catholics or are reconverted to hindu faith.the  madhva monastries and Hindu nationalism is pretty strong a force in mangalore.though there are a few koraga christians,but koraga is listed as a separate language.They can't be added as tuluva.Tulu culture is pretty much hindu and the remaining jain.Koragas are listed as a separate ehtnic group though they associate more with tulu than kannada.what is Tulu chritian culture?.Most protestant churches sing kannada konkani hyms not tulu except the pavoor church.Beary muslims can be classified as Tulu since beary find mention even in paddanas.there  is  vibrant mangalorean konkani christian culture not tulu.Muskeeter8 (talk) 03:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please add new sections to the bottom of the page. Or just click on "New Section" to add a new topic. There are Christians among Tulus. I had added a referece some time back but someone removed it. I have added it back. Hope that erases any doubts. --Deepak D'Souza 05:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that some ethnicities have strong relations with a particular religion. For example, the Arab identity is strongly related with Islam. Likewise, the Tuluva identity is strongly related with Hinduism and Jainism. But on Wikipedia, irrespective of what anyone considers, all religions have to be represented. Forget Christianity, even if there any Muslim Tuluvas or Buddhist Tuluvas, even they have to be mentioned. 
*Bulletin, Volume 25, Issues 1-4, p. 41
*Google Book search on Tulu Protestants KensplanetTC 05:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

text: 2001 statistics of Tulu Nadu from the Diocese of Mangalore clearly states that there are 60,434 Protestants. Are you trying to say, none are  Tulu-speaking. KensplanetTC 05:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

text: I personally know a couple of Tuluva Catholics and Protestants.  Joyson Prabhu Holla at me!  10:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Are there really any tulu christians

message: ::IP dont delete the majority of the article when you disagree with somone, it looks like an edit war in the article history, ive removed the warnings linguistic gave you, but it looks like you may have a history of blanking articles to cause an edit war, don't do that please--Lerdthenerd (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd wait a few more days, just in case. But is he watching this page? Has he been notified?--res Laozi speak 23:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

text: In response to the request from User:RegentsPark. As far as I understand, User:LinguisticGeek has added a chunk of text describing various communities that are Tuluvas which the IP says is unnecessary and unencyclopedic. Malayali example is not the best, it is not even a good article, let alone a featured article as mentioned by the IP. See the featured article Tamil people for example. IMO, IP sounds like a reasonable person and definitely not like a language chauvinist vandal as desribed by LinguisticGeek in his 08:02, 14 February 2011 post. It will be best if everyone stays WP:Civil and not resort to WP:Personal attacks. Considering LinguisticGeek's propensity to personally attack others (see Mr Anti Nair/upper caste barb at me) that disagree with him, i am not surprised. I would recommend one paragraph describing all communities and one paragraph describing all the religions. another option is to draw the attention of more editors by placing a note in other public venues. --CarTick (talk) 18:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: People

message: It would be better if we include a sport person's pic also in the group.
Kindly suggest some names for inclusion, of which one pic can be finalised 117.198.108.120 (talk) 04:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture at the begining of the article

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Sri sir Vishwesha Theertha Swamiji.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:13, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:AishwaryaRai.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: When someone adds some info it's pretty usual that he/she has a source for that info. If you don't agree well you can always challenge that!! 
It's like you know it exists!! you have witnessed it!! you have proof!! but some people on wiki just don't let it happen.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianDroid (talk • contribs) 
Hi there!
Firstly please familiarize yourself with the standards laid down here, WP:NOT. I have recently reverted your edits as you fail to provide reliable reference sources for the same. Original research as given here, WP:ORIGINAL is strictly not allowed on Wikipedia. Thank you and have a nice day! --PageImp (talk) 09:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do people revert the change without even doing basic research?