lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2 Willow Road

message: Having visited the house, my understanding is that the opposition was to the radical design of the houses themselves, rather than to the demolition of the previous properties, which were dilapidated and not architecturally or historially distinguished.86.1.196.156 (talk) 22:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "A number of cottages were demolished to allow for the construction, which was strongly opposed by a number of local residents"

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 13:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Carradale House

message: The block seems to have little notability on its own. I propose to merge the article to a section of the article on its neighbour, Balfron Tower. (In contrast, their other neighbour Glenkerry House is notable because of its tenure model.) - Fayenatic (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think merging both Balfron Tower and Carradale House makes sense as they are supposed to be inextricably linked by the nature of their design and position to each other (if not by the dates of construction). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.54.6 (talk • contribs) 11:03, 6 February 2010
I think it is logical to have those two buidlings together in one page as they both seem so similar, if not identical, in style and design  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.60.98.134 (talk) 11:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

text: - Fayenatic (talk) 13:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Portland Building

message: The Oregonian. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  http://wweek.com/html/25-what.html -Pete (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion source 

message: The building remains controversial among Portlanders
There is/was a bus operator who referred to a stop for it as "..., Portlandia, the great ugly building it sits on" --Jason McHuff (talk) 09:15, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: I have removed from the article the claim that "Portland Municipal Services Building" is an alternate name for the building, as was already done earlier for "Portland Public Services Building" (also claimed to be an alternative name for the Portland Building), due to lack of evidence.  The Emporis listing is the article's only reference for this claim, and I do not believe that one reference is sufficient on its own to support including this statement in the article. Personally, Wikipedia is the only place I've ever seen this claim, but if someone else has reliable sources to support it, then feel free to re-add the statement, with citations. SJ Morg (talk) 10:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: i should think that the emporis reference is more reliable than one editor that doesn't concur. either way, there are google references found under the other name, and that is sufficient for a mention in the article, even if it's just for a cross-reference. --emerson7 02:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only one name 

message: * http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/10/the_portland_building_architec.html ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: "Not all commentary has been negative." begins the 4th paragraph under "Reception." But that quote by Goldberger is definitely negative. He said that our building's look drove other American architects back to classic architecture. So if you ever rewrite this section...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.179.189 (talk) 19:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goldberger's remark WAS negative
Talk:Kiasma

message: It says 
"It is named after the Greek letter "chi"  and on the word for "crossing" based on it alluding to the basic conceptual idea of its architect, Steven Holl." 
I don't see a mention like that on Finnish page. Kiasma means chiasma in Finnish, so I assume "word for crossing" means chiasma. Or does "Robert Schediwy Kiasma - ein neues Kunstmuseum in: Staedtebilder - Reflexionen zum Wandel in Architektur und Urbanistik, Vienna 2005 p 98 ff" say something else?
Wikinist 22:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Sony Center

message: Why did they use Center rather than Centre? Welshleprechaun 09:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Timperley

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Timperley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080509073412/http://www.partridge.dsl.pipex.com/tcf/about.htm to http://www.partridge.dsl.pipex.com/tcf/about.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
I was curious about ecclesiastical provision in Timperley - as one sometimes is - and went to the C of E Timperley Church website in search of a date for the  church and any information about the past of the parish.  Nothing to be had, I think, but it assured me that God will provide everything I need, just in time.   Does God edit Wikipedia? 2A00:23C7:5A0B:8601:1527:DA4D:CA60:6A9D (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Xenophont Ivanov

message: We might need to rename the article "Ksenofont Ivanov" per Romanization of Bulgarian.
Is he well-known in sources as "Xenophont"? --Cameltrader 14:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's like choosing between Alexander and Aleksandar... as long as there's a redirect it's OK, although I'd prefer Ksenofont (extravagant name by the way :)) Todor→Bozhinov 13:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xenophont/Ksenofont 
Talk:Gate of Europe

message: How are they stable if they are leaning? Badagnani (talk) 22:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stability

message: It looks as if inclination, as such was not the motivation, but leaning so far that every foot of the top floor is not over the bottom floor -- i.e., it's all hanging over ground level space. 98.210.208.107 (talk) 16:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclination

message: the article contains no third party sources, only a ref to FCC the company behind it. Not enough for a wikipage, which is why I flagged it for notability.--Wuerzele (talk) 17:20, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: removed the corp|notability tag and replaced it with . 
I disagree with his assessment:The article doesnt JUST need more refs, it needs independent refs. Discuss instead of reverting.--Wuerzele (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability? 
Talk:Cuala Press

message: This comment was originally added to the top of the article:
:Despite what is written below the Cuala Press was not established until 1908, when it broke away from the Dun Emer Industries, which was founded in 1904 by Evelyn Gleeson, who brought Susan Mary ("Lily") Yeats and her younger sister Elizabeth Corbet ("Lollie") Yeats aboard as minor partners. Lily ran the Embroidery department, Lollie the printing. The two groups parted company in 1908, partly because of finances but largely because of Lollie's difficult personality. Lily and Lollie then established the Cuala Industries for printing and embroidery. William Butler Yeats agreed to serve as editor and adviser for the press and to provide works for publication but never held office in either Dun Emer or Cuala. [For a detailed and accurate history see Further Reading below.] - 22:23, December 6, 2005 4.157.71.126 
:Grstain | Talk 14:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That comment matches the sources I used in expanding Lily Yeats.  I'll change the date to 1908 and try to get more cleanup done soon. - PKM (talk) 02:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Vitor Negrete

message: There is a note in the Mount Everest article that Negrete died because of theft of equipment. Is that a documented fact? No such mention is made here.
If he couldn't make it down, how did he die near camp 3?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.191.207.3 (talk) 06:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vladimir Damgov

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Walerian Borowczyk

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://culture.pl/en/artist/walerian-borowczyk. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GermanJoe (talk) 11:50, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:American Academy in Rome

message: Hi everyone. I did a mass removal of content, as pretty much all of the content recently added was added from non-neutral sources or was just plain not neutral (promoting the institution). I know it's smaller and less exciting now, but, please keep this in mind when contributing. Thank you. Sarah (talk) 16:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of content 
Talk:Villa Tugendhat

message: Removed the sentence reading "Whether the claim will be successful (can a building, for legal purposes, be considered a work of art?) remains to be seen" regarding the claim of the heirs of Fritz and Greta Tugendhat as it was poorly written and seemed unnecessary. If, however, anyone else knows of the outcome of their claim, please feel free to add it to the article. 78.145.173.95 (talk) 23:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heirs' Claim
Talk:Night Network

message: Here is tv listings 17 1996 
* LWT : http://tvlistings.thetvroomplus.com/listing-168.html
* Granda   http://tvlistings.thetvroomplus.com/listing-174.html
BOTH The same:
--------------------------------------
17th Feb 1996 all four have the same listings but ARE different to London service! 
* HTV  http://tvlistings.thetvroomplus.com/listing-175.html
* Merdrain  http://tvlistings.thetvroomplus.com/listing-177.html
* Anglia http://tvlistings.thetvroomplus.com/listing-169.html
* West country http://tvlistings.thetvroomplus.com/listing-172.html
Meridian provide the service to Anglia, thus it must have been the Meridian feed that HTV and west got.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazyseiko (talk • contribs) 21:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof that HTV took Meridian service:

message: ITV Night screen, what most areas use now, has been around since 1998. but in what regions, and when? Any info on this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rafmarham (talk • contribs) 12:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Nightscreen come in? 

message: A number of change were down to the page over the weekend, reason is no details have appeared and this should now bring this page up to date. 
ITV Night Time Junction - 4th January 1995: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Er9hKdnl5eM  Carlton and Central had same line and branding it seems, Meridian did not!
* Meridian, Anglia and Channel all had the same line up from January 1995  With HTV and Westcountry joining in Jan 1996. 
* From January 1995, Granada, HTV, Central, Carlton, westcountry, LWT , Border and UTV all had the same line up but different branding in use. 
Thus the page has been updated to reflect the new information found out.  
Questions which remains.
* Did Central take the London Branding from June 1994? If so what did it do at the weekends. 
* Did Anglia did the same branding as Meridian from January 1995 
* Exact Dates of certain idents 
--Crazyseiko (talk) 18:37, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Changes.  
Talk:330 North Wabash

message: I'm pretty sure that this building also appeared in the 1998 film Mercury Rising. Shouldn't this be included in the article under In Film? Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 22:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie appearances 

message: The Hotel should probably be given its own section in the article. SecretName101 (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Langham
Talk:Kluczynski Federal Building

message: Both this article and the article on the Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse are stubs.  I propose that both be merged into an article called Chicago Federal Center which would also include a section on the Loop Postal Station.Goldnpuppy (talk) 21:30, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Not sure who contributed that skyline photo, but it is now over 12 years old. I like the imbedded links and hopefully it can be replicated with a new image.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.173.190.26 (talk) 19:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skyline Photo Replacement
Talk:Kilocore

message: This is quite interesting I hope it will be available for consumer products.--74.36.255.119 14:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

message: The article isn't clear as to whether this is 1024 or 1025 cores on a single chip, or if multiple closely-coupled chips are required. MarkMLl (talk) 11:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chip count 

message: I did some research on the kilocore. Rapport Inc.'s website is offline, they have been removed from power.org and even IBM is not very communicative about the cooperation and the technology. I think, they went bankrupt.. Wallento (talk) 13:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like Rapport and kilocore quietly disappeared. Could find no source beyond 2006/2007. See http://www.ibm.com/Search/?sn=23&q=kilocore&v=16&us=utf&lang=en&cc=us&Search=Search Superp (talk) 20:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

text: There has been some news recently… seems like ibm is still working on something like that, but Rapport wasn't mentioned. http://gizmodo.com/new-kilocore-chip-is-the-worlds-first-with-1-000-proc-1782305737 82.135.103.93 (talk) 13:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead?
Talk:Sociolect

message: The article really needs a LEDE explaining what a sociolect is and how it differs from a dialect. As it is, it dives directly into detail far too soon, with a tendency to use sociology jargon instead of plain language. For instance, there is a section on "code switching" but no explanation of what "codes" are or why one would switch.
I'm not an expert on the subject, but I'd use a couple of plain language examples. For instance, many "computer geeks" have a particular sociolect (the Simpson's "Comic Book Guy" is an example). Personally, I first became aware of this term during an on-line discussion of the vocal mannerisms of some American gay men, that it was a socilect. Again, not an expert, but perhaps someone knowledgeable on the subject could find references to these two examples, or others, to create a more useful introduction to the term? K8 fan (talk) 22:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a LEDE 

message: The discrimination section is exclusively focused on Albania, which is worthy of discussion, but someone should add more examples.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bewildered Oregonian (talk • contribs) 01:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand Discrimination section 

message: Below are examples of the lack of the possessive ending -s is usually absent in AAVE but contains a rule As Labov shows states, "[the] use -s to indicate possession by a single noun or pronoun, but never between the possessor and the possessed."
it's gibberish. I'd re-write it but I have no idea of the author's intended meaning. it is, however, comically ironic in the context of a page that purports to explain a language issue.
duncanrmi (talk) 12:45, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  what on earth does this sentence mean?
Talk:Baltimore World Trade Center

message: Article needs fixing.  Very unclear meaning. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.123.7.20 (talk) 
:What specific parts are unclear, or what information is lacking/confusing/etc.? The article is very short, but it seems to be quite simply written and explain the basic details of this building. DMacks 00:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

message: The article referenced by the "Baltimore WTC stats" external link claims a total of 32 floors (above ground). However, Governor O'Malley's press release for September 10, 2010 cites 28 floors. When I counted the rows of windows in the building's photograph, I got 28. So that's what I put in the infobox. Folklore1 (talk) 18:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected the "story" count to 30, as it was counted by the architects. An explanation, with reference to a web page published by the architects, is now part of the article. Folklore1 (talk) 19:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Floors (above ground level) 

message: After another editor removed this section as off-topic, I revised the text to eliminate the portion which I agree wanders too far from the subject. However, we do need some mention of the name's significance and its connection with the rest of the world through the association. I've also moved some related text into this paragraph that was previously part of the lead section. Folklore1 (talk) 23:26, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Significance/relationship to a larger organization is definitely viable material. I trimmed out one half-sentence as it was still getting off-topic (there's a whole article about the org, so generic history of the org is not specific to a member of it). It still feels a bit weighty compared to the total of the article, but I think only because the rest of the article is so light. DMacks (talk) 23:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Agreed. I think the text about the name is sufficiently trimmed now.Folklore1 (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of building's name 

message: I tagged the section for WP:NPOV after this edit. It added non-neutral extensive and uncited commentary on design motivations, artistic merit, and emotional impact. Looking more closely, all the added content is similarly problematic--poor tone, almost promotional--not just one or two items added there and not just expanding/extending pre-existing problems. Therefore I'm going to undo that edit as I dispute too many parts of it for too many reasons to improve it bit by bit. DMacks (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-neutral content/tone problem in 9/11 Memorial section
Talk:Raffles City Singapore

message: Each building should have an infobox.  Right now it appears that they are all in one infobox.  This is confusing. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:15, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I see that some of the separate ones already exist, making this one partially redundant.  I suggest splitting out the office tower and the shopping mall and leaving them in expanded sections here until separate articles are created from the existing redirects. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Infoboxes
Talk:Miami Tower

message: Do we really need a bunch of pictures of this office? Its alot of pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.39.122 (talk) 19:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of pictures 

message: I put the pop culture thing back. The reference in Vice City is actually really vague though. It's located on the beach, miami beach basically, it's short and square, only the color of the paint and windows and the three tiers make it recognizable. Daniel Christensen (talk) 02:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: pop culture
Talk:Ferguson Center for the Arts

message: I added references from where I received my general information posted to this article. This may be an incomplete reference list because I did not make the article in the beginning, and no references were previously posted. I have extensively re-worked this article and edited it down. I feel the three references that I have provided give most of the information, and warrants the removal of the references needed box at the top of the article. Please comment if it is felt this is still needed. Thanks (Nicolaususry 02:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added References

message: Before anyone else edits the "Student Productions" section back in, please discuss rationale here instead of starting an add/delete war. (Nicolaususry (talk) 07:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Student Productions

message: I have added semi-protection to this page because it appears that two IP address parties cannot agree whether or not "Student Productions" should exist on this page. With this article about a University campus, the editing of this page cannot be monitored by the IP address because they are all the same, or within the same block. If you would like to re-add "Student Publications", please register and discuss such an edit here first. Thanks, (Nicolaususry (talk) 03:06, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-Protection
Talk:Four Seasons Hotel New York

message: Emporis is not a reliable source - anyone can open an account and contribute content. Please find reliable sources that support the assertions of notability. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Key Tower

message: The article states this was originally called the Society Center. It wasn't. This building was the Standard Oil Building, and later the BP Building, then the Society Center. 
-Unsigned  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.57.6.189 (talk) 15:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The above change wasn't made because it's not true. You're conflating two buildings. 200 Public Square is the former BP Building, not this tower. - Eureka Lott 05:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential error 

message: wikipedia says how much terminial tower cost why not key tower? i would like to know. by the way when i build downtown cleveland on Simcity 3000 i use Gold Tower for Key Tower. i have traveled all over the country and have not seen a building looking similar to key building. so in addition to cost of building id like to know if it has relatives.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.51.212.6 (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  how much did the tower cost? 