Talk:Mobile workstation

message: As far as I can tell, the DeskNote is not a category of PC, but a specific laptop made by ECS. The article seems to waver between calling it a "desknote" (lowercase), similar to a "laptop" or "desktop", and calling it by its trademark name, DeskNote. Is this actually the case? If so, the term shouldn't be used in the more general sense of referring to "desknote computers." -- Wapcaplet 23:52 18 Jul 2003 (UTC)
:The term is actually "desktop replacement". I'm going to be bold and change the title (and content) accordingly, for three reasons:
:*Desknote is not nearly as common a term as "Desktop Replacement", and the two are essentially synonymous. Google returns three times as many hits for the latter as for the former.
:*This article seems pretty uncertain on what, exactly, constitutes a "desknote" - does the iMac even count? I thought they had to be similar in form to a laptop, in which case a better example would be the 17" MacBook Pro, or any other 17"+ laptop.
:*"Desktop Replacement Computer" is a far more common term, but currently has no article. I'll redirect from here to Desktop replacement computer.
Hope this isn't too much of an issue. RandyWang 13:38, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So are Desktop replacements which seem to be described somewhat differently than in this Desktop replacement computer article.
I don't know who is right but there seems to be consider confusion and overlapping articles on this subject. Desktop replacement computers appears to be an orphaned article. (I am new here and may not know what I am talking about.)
KarenAnn 14:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desknotes is listed under Laptop 

message: Many statements in the article are later contradicted, making the article confusing. For example, the article says in the intro paragraph that desktop replacements use standard parts, but says in the last paragraph ("problems with desktop replacements" I think) that they can't.--Frenchman113  on wheels! 21:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 

message: I googled both of them and the only desktop replacement computer definition that google comes up with is this article in Wikipedia. There are somewhat more responses to desknote. I have no opionion on the subject but this discussion is the reason citations and references are so important. Statements have no credibility otherwise and are just opinions. See Wikipedia:Citing sources. To quote this Wikipedia page:
::Providing sources for edits is mandated by Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Verifiability, which are policy. This means that any material that is challenged and has no source may be removed by any editor. See those pages and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for more information.
We can upgrade this page enormously if we follow the Wikipedia policy. Otherwise, Desktop replacement computer page will languish in the dustbin.
KarenAnn 23:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are 1.4 million google hits for "desktop replacement" and 500,000 for "desknote." TomTheHand 17:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desktop replacement computer versus desknote 

message: Other computer articles, e.g. laptop talk about desknote but anyone who clicks desknote gets this article instead. That must be confusing to anyone trying to learn about the subject!  KarenAnn 10:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're the same thing; since the same information was extant in both desknotes and this article, I redirected the former and removed the merge tag from the latter.  RasputinAXP  c 14:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge does not seem complete, since the word "desknote" is missing from this article. This is important if the redirect is to make sense. Notinasnaid 16:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Desktop replacement computer does not even show up on Google (except for this Wikipedia article, nor  is it mentioned in any of the other computer articles in Wikipedia. Why use a name that no one else uses? I don't understand. Plus, I took my material and put a lot of work into a Desknotes page and now that page and the work I put into it is completely gone. KarenAnn 17:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Also, my section was completely removed from the article. It is totally gone. Everything I did is gone. The same thing happened to me on the Fidel Castro page. Just ask mensch who was kind enough to work hard at restoring it. There removing someone's contributions without discussion was consided by mensch as against Wikipedia policy. KarenAnn 17:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that "desknote" should be mentioned.  I removed the "Comparison to desknotes" section because the terms are essentially synonymous, the content was just copied and pasted from a couple of online definitions, and one of the definitions was inaccurate. TomTheHand 17:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Removing duplicate material is, however, in accordance with policies. You should make the case that your material is not duplicating the same ground, or saying the same thing in a different way. Look closely at both to decide, I know how easy it is to get attached to your own words. "Everything I did is gone" is the normal experience, what matters is whether the final article is better. If it isn't better, say so. Quote specific cases to say why. Above all, engage: stay in the discussion, nothing will happen if you go somewhere else. Notinasnaid 17:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I no longer have access to my material anymore since it has been deleted. Otherwise, I could follow your advice and do as you suggest and perhaps learn something. Anyway, I had just started that subsection when I a got nasty message regarding it on my talk page. I get the message and will go away KarenAnn 18:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You material wasn't deleted, it was redirected; the information you had is still in the page history. When I redirected it the Desknote section still existed in this article. That said, the Desknote seems to me to be less of a general term than it is a specific model from a manufacturer. Desktop replacement machines encompass both large laptops and the "desknote" segment and is widely used in the IT industry.  RasputinAXP  c 18:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: KarenAnn, as several people have pointed out, much of what you wrote in "Desknote" was just quoted definitions from other web sites. These are considered less good than rewritten text, so will tend to be deleted. But you have made an important mistake, one that is easy to make, so I will point it out here in the hope it won't catch so many people in future.  You quoted a definition from "The Free Dictionary" on http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Desknote. Well, suppose it was rewritten, couldn't this at least be a reference? Unfortunately, absolutely not. Why? Read to the bottom of the page: "This article is copied from an article on Wikipedia.org - the free encyclopedia created and edited by online user community." In other words, you are quoting from a site, which just copied from Wikipedia, at some time in the past when the article was different. There are now lots and lots of sites which copy Wikipedia, and it's important to watch out for this when looking for accurate sources for Wikipedia articles! Notinasnaid 21:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article's name  needs to be changed to desknote 

message: They are still made, so that introduction needs to be changed. I am going to buy one for myself.
In Correct (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Desktop Replacements Are Not Short Lived

message: An image used in this article, File:Acer Aspire 8920 Gemstone by Georgy.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Acer Aspire 8920 Gemstone by Georgy.JPG Nominated for Deletion

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dragtop. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 21:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dragtop" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]