lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saw II

message: Sorry to bother anyone, but Saw II has box office information concerning a movie called Dangal. Can someone please edit this? Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flynncaldow1 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks very much! I fixed it. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 12:49, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box office
Talk:Saratoga Springs, New York

message: This story has been around for as long as I can remember. I think it's worthwhile for WP to state that it isn't true. The report is not "something that didn't happen", but rather something that a piece of folklore is not true. Peter Flass (talk) 03:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , to my mind, it belongs on the American Pie (song) article (where it has a small section that mentions Saratoga Springs but not here. That serves the function of making this content available to our readership. It's such a minor thing that IMO it doesn't need to be mentioned on more than one article. If you are wanting to add it to another article in addition to A.Pie (song) it would make much more sense to add it to Don McLean than here. Netherzone (talk) 06:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Pie 

message: Why does Saratoga Springs link directly to Saratoga Springs, New York instead of the Saratoga Springs (disambiguation) page or one of the others listed? What makes New York's more special? - Indefensible (talk) 02:04, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s the original, and also the best known.Peter Flass (talk) 01:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig 

message: Should we mention that it is considered the halfway point between New York City and Montreal? 208.127.190.114 (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halfway point
Talk:Lynbrook, New York

message: Errr.. the article gives these figures for census breakdown in 2010:
As of the 2010 census [4] the population of the village was 85.3% White 77.7% Non-Hispanic White, 3.7% African American, 0.1% Native American, 4.5% Asian, 4.3% from other races, and 2.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 13% of the population.
This adds up to 181.4%. Is it possible there's an error here? (Looking for an obvious error, like inputting of too many "7"'s)Even if "other white" is adjusted to 7.7%, it still sums to more than 100%. AgProv (talk) 22:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Weird Demographics

message: The article mentions Lynbrook, CA, yet I can't find anything online that says such a place actually exists...
:It does not appear to now. Propose to clear this comment and the one above. MKoltnow 01:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Propose to move statement about Chambers to bulleted Trivia list. MKoltnow 01:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Organization

message: I removed the following paragraph- 
This looked like a disagreement in the middle of the article. Also there is no source that it is frequently called Lynbrook U.S.A.--BeckiGreen (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed the following.
Talk:Rook (bird)

message: This excellent article needs references.  Properly sourced it would be suitable for WP:FAC. --Theo  (Talk) 00:41, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs needed

message: In the UK and Ireland Crows are black (not like east of aproximate longitude 10 East, where crows are partly grey and easier to distinguish from Rooks). I once heard that "In England a lonley Rook is a Crow, but 100 Crows together are Rooks !" There seems to be something in that statement, Rooks are more social  (and also more urban). But anyone that have heared the expression (or something like it) ? Boeing720 (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  True or false (for Brittons mainly) 

message: * Note: [moved from GA subpage, which does not appear on watchlists cygnis insignis 19:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, do! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I need to deep dive the literature, for a comparison of how they rate with other smart birds, Gisella Kaplan is a leading researcher. Birds tend to outperform mammals, so they are a good comparative test subject and I think this species is one of the best studied, great apes are only quite intelligent for mammals (humans have other advantages that skew measures of intelligence, not sure if they have been compared to corvids). I have a strange story about magpies, and another about crows, but that is pers comm and irrelevant here :-) cygnis insignis 19:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I am tired and about to sleep, but my thinking is veering keep. Need to read it properly tomorrow Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence 

message: Just added a link to educational article with a video about Rook. I think would be very interesting for kids (video) and adults  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.barkan (talk • contribs) 09:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links modified
Talk:Margaret Hogg

message: How does this subject meet Wikipedia's notability criteria? Rklawton (talk) 14:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There is some lasting coverage of this event . Maybe not the most notable murder case, but I don't see anything wrong with having an article about a somewhat notable murder case under the title of the victim. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Mystery shopper

message: I know the Problems with Mystery Shoppers section of the article may sound a bit POV.  But based on my experiences it is the truth.  The example I gave about the tables being cleaned within three minutes was from a job I had at a restaruant ten years ago.  The form only asked if the tables were cleaned within three minutes, with no consideration to any other factors given.  It didn't matter if it was Friday at 6:30pm when it was about the busiest, or 3pm on a weekday afternoon when it was the slowest.  Either the tables were cleaned within three minutes or they weren't.  No room for interpertation at all.  And that was how it was with all the questions on the form.  No thought was given to the particular circumstances.  Plus the manager (who was not a very nice person) used to get so worked up about his score, which made for a very tense and stressful working enviornment. 
JesseG 01:01, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
:While I don't doubt the description of your experiences for a moment, Wikipedia doesn't allow original research, I'm afraid.  Can you find a source that makes this sort of claim?  If so, then something similar could be reinserted with a citation. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:17, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Filet lace

message: I removed reference to "guipure" as this is a different type of lace, and added "Filet Brode" as another common name for Filet Lace. -- Julie E. 18:56, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Is this the same as darned net? --85.197.210.44 (talk) 11:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darned net 

message: what is the 19th/20thc machine-made "filet" net curtain material called,  what type of machine is it made on?  I presume some adaptation of a knitting machine, as it has sets of two thinner yarns running up the warp, with the heavier thread in the weft.  I have to find some for restoration work.184.148.67.117 (talk) 22:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to know 

message: Does anybody know what happened to the Arizona archive? Pages all over the web point there but the links always return 404s and I have no idea whether the documents are still available, but elsewhere, or gone for good. --86.5.88.131 (talk) 01:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Arizona links broken
Talk:Danny Ford

message: The redirect Coach Ford has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 14:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Coach Ford]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Old Goa

message: Should this be at Velha Goa or Old Goa. I noticed the Slovenian, German, and Czech all had it under Velha not Old Goa. Falphin 01:17, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: The physical removal of the Palace of the Adil Shah from Old Goa to Nova Goa (Pangim) was truly a remarkable feat, as the article says: "The viceroy then moved the palace of Adil Sha to Panaji". To the best of my knowledge, the Paco de Idalcao in Nova Goa was always where it is. 
But what is "In 1835 after religious suppression the city was virtually deserted" supposed to mean? 
The article also needs to clarify that there are 2 separate "ghost cities" of Old Goa, called Goa Velha and Velha Goa respectively. Goa Velha is the first city of Goa, to the south of the present site of Old Goa. Old Goa or Velha Goa is the city founded by Arab refugees from Bhatkal and conquered first by Yusuf Adil Shah I ("Idalcao") from the Raja of Belgaum, a feudatory of Vijayanagaram, and then by Albuquerque from Yusuf Adil Shah I.
WikiSceptic 06:28, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Amazing Feat

message: It would seem that this article reproduces most of its text verbatim from the page given in its "external link" - http://naturalnirvana.com/India/IndianStates/Goa/Old-Goa.htm. Would that come under Copyright violation? WikiSceptic 19:30, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?

message: I have removed the article from the Goa category because the History of Goa one is inherent to the former. --Algorithme (talk) 00:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories
Talk:Wetware

message: Hah, what a daft term! --Beachy 01:38, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Oxford English Dictionary has citations of the word from the 1970s, much earlier than what is currently mentioned in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.213.77.129 (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "early use of the term" 

message: Am I the only one who finds the current intro over-done / over-written? I think it would be strengthened by a more simple lead sentence, closer to a definition: Wetware is a term used to describe the central nervous system of humans or animals; originally used as a humorous analogy to the computer concepts of hardware and software. By extension...(rest of text)". While I think the current text is an interesting exploration, the opening should also be as accessible as possible.--Gregalton 07:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overwrought intro? 

message: um...as the title says. Pongley (talk) 22:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup of source listings in main article body
File talk:Drunktanuki2-2.gif

message: From WP:IFD:
*:Image:Drunktanuki2-2.gif, poor drawing, adds nothing to Wikipedia--nixie 11:37, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

message: There are an abundance of traditional tanuki drawings available that would better represent the important place that tanuki hold in Japanese society. I move that this drawing be stricken and a traditional woodcut or cartoon by a Japanese artist be included. Preferably one that shows one of the early references to tanuki. If no one disagrees I'll go ahead and do so, only because this image has remarkably avoided deletion once before. 219.89.17.38 19:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously, this drawing adds little to the article
Talk:Foreign relations of Ecuador

message: What is the physical environment like?
What methods have people traditionally used to meet thier needs?
What things happened in the past to endanger the culture?
What things are happening today to threaten the culture?
--Supergal 02:11, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: POWERFUL QUESTION ABOUT ECUADOR
Talk:List of radio stations in Tennessee

message: KWAM markets itself as a Memphis station; however, as can be ascertained from its callsign, it is really across the Mississippi River from Memphis in Arkansas and does not really belong on this list.  Rlquall 02:13, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Often when creating radio station articles it can be difficult to find reliable secondary sources that help "prove" notability.  One easy and useful reliable source is the website of the radio network of a professional sports team.  For example, for a station in the Tennessee Titans (NFL) radio network, this bit of text provides a useful outside reference:
The station is an affiliate of the Tennessee Titans radio network. 
I am in the process of adding this to existing articles. - Dravecky (talk) 07:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful reliable sources 

message: Thank you to Rollins College via the Wikipedia Visiting Scholars program for access to subscription databases used in compiling this article. -- M2545 (talk) 15:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acknowledgment 
Talk:FHM 100 Sexiest Women in the World 2005

message: ...this appears to be just the British list. Angelina Jolie was the worldwide winner - every country had a different list. AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 02:56, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: So why are there 101 in the list? 81.159.6.49 17:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  101?
Talk:Neville Longbottom

message: Discussion ported over to Harry Potter WikiProject: Merge Proposal Luna Lovegood and Neville Longbottom. As this discussion is redundant;y repeated over at Luna Lovegood, it is best to consolidate the discussion at the wikiproject level. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 12:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I come with this suggestion to split the contents of this page into other articles. This is basically because we have 4 characters listed under one single name. Also, the page violates several Wiki policies and guidelines: the plot appearances are extremely large if compared with the rest of the article, and the section is extremely overdetailed. The attributes and family section are also just plot re-tell. All of this violates WP:WAF and WP:PLOT. The page has also failed to meet notability, as no coverage by a large amount of reliable secondary sources nor any impact in popular culture has been added. Even within the universe, we have alredy merged characters with great importance such as Sirius Black (who have a book named after him) or McGonagall, or with critical/political commentary like Umbridge, or family articles like Weasleys, Potters or Dursleys already split or merged. Because of this, I propose to split the contents of this page into multiple articles:
*Move Neville into Dumbledore's Army, his primary role in the series (apart from the prophecy thing, but as Rowling herself said, this didn't give him further role and remained the "tantalising might-have-been").
*Move Frank and Alice into Order of the Phoenix.
*Move Augusta into Supporting characters: if we have sections for Gabrielle Delacour, Andromeda, Xenophilius, Teddy Lupin, etc., then Augusta perfectly fits there. 
Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 02:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually like this idea better than merging all of this into Dumbledore's Army. Neville's article may be semi-good, but I'd rather see it split/merged than being trapped forever in this state. – sgeureka t•c 11:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well Augusta, Frank and Alice doesn't have anything to do with the DA. — CHANDLER#10 — 12:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Chandler is right. Frank, Alice and Augusta have nothing to do with the D.A. and that's why I propose to split into different articles. This split would include the moving of some information from the "Appearances" section to Frank and Alice rather than Neville, for example the details that inspired Rowling to create the visit to St. Mungo's. This is similar to the case of the Potter and Weasley families, in which the listed characters were moved into different articles. --LoЯd ۞pεth 23:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and/or Split page 

message: I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Neat work..
Whiteguru (talk) 02:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback from New Page Review process
Talk:Magical creatures in Harry Potter

message: Currently, there is a section entitled "List of magical creatures mentioned in the film series." However, each sub-heading within this section is mostly dedicated to information exclusively from the books. As such, I would suggest renaming this section to reflect general notability, as that seems to be the reasoning for their current inclusion. However, before I begin overhauling this article, I wanted to see the general consensus on this point. TNstingray (talk) 14:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancies Between Sections
Talk:The Two Coreys

message: What is the point of this page? They each have their own page and the show with this title has its own as well. 2601:601:1600:5F70:2A67:83C:2C98:2B37 (talk) 06:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like a fair question given the current state of the page. If nobody responds with an answer you find satisfactory, you may want to look into WP:Proposed deletion. DonIago (talk) 12:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider deleting - duplicate
Talk:Facial (sexual act)

message: Hi I would love to know more about this 2601:441:8202:DA70:A4A7:5FD5:6220:5214 (talk) 03:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I hear you man. Give it a read. Zanahary (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  hey
Talk:Doxy (Theology)

message: Doxy is also Jazz piece by Sonny Rollins. --Thydzik 09:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Is this article really appropriate? It seems more like a dictionary entry, if even that. 192.82.6.39 06:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate?
Talk:Move Along

message: ?!?!?! -- FishStik 23:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the tracklist? 

message: sure maybe
but i think emo should be included in there as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.221.153.204 (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: power pop?
Talk:Pets in the Harry Potter series

message: This page should probably redirect to something like Animals in the Harry Potter series or similar.  The animals listed here are not really "pets" in the conventional sense, given that they are supposed to have magical properties and are often used for a particular purpose -- post owls are hardly pets, for example.  Exploding Boy 16:15, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
:There are at least two other pages for animals in general, Magical_beasts_(Harry_Potter) and Minor_Harry_Potter_Beasts.  The animals listed here are all owned by a character in the books, which is why they're listed as pets (even if some of them are useful in addition to being pets). --Icarus 21:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Scabbers

message: Should this be merged with Peter Pettigrew, since they are the same character and that fact is apparent on either page when you read it. (Discuss) Sandpiper 09:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well, they are the same person, it is redundant to have two articles. Cyclone49 09:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (video game)

message: I'm quite new to Wikipedia but i suggest we have a table like we do on Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (video game).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bottomlivefan95 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table 

message: Anyone else know that there is also a computer game (in disk form) for Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets? As far as I know, this goes the same for Sorcerer's Stone/Philosopher's Stone and Prizoner of Azkaban. Should this be mentioned? 98.21.141.148 (talk) 22:26, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer Game 

message: I've added a section "Versions" that summarises all games I've found with the title. Since this article's title is "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (video game)" and not platform-specifc, it should summarise all the known versions. --Philcha (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Versions

message: There is no Reception Section, just a chart showing the average score of different versions of the game on Metacritic and a discussion on the the differences between the versions. -Zyrath 03:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Reception Section 

message: Someone needs to split them up because not all of these spells are available in all versions of the game. Like in the PS1 version, you don't learn Alohamora, Diffindo or Lumos. 119.224.27.62 (talk) 01:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spells section is a bit misleading. 

message: The article states that the Metacritic score for the Mac version of this game is 73%, however there's no mention of the game for Mac on the Metacritic site. The other source that the article uses, IGN's UK site, didn't review the Mac version of the game, either. Unless I'm missing something, that 73% seems to have come from somewhere else.--96.60.175.237 (talk) 05:21, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mac score
Talk:Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup

message: There doesn't seem to be any evidence about how names are spelt in this game, so for some of the European names I've tried to put in more usual spellings or ones mentioned elsewhere, but obviously this is open to amendment.  (I'm not entirely sure why at one point these were edited back, some of them to quite odd phonetic spellings such as Bouwsheeay instead of the usual French name Bougier which is pronounced the same way).  However, if anyone's got any evidence about how the names should be spelt it would be handy.    Tobelia 17:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name spellings