lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parthasarathy Temple, Chennai

message: hi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.118.175 (talk) 08:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone tell me when the janmashtami/gokulashtami/krishna-jayanti celebrations will be held at the Parthasarathy Temple in Triplicane? I'm sorry this is not the best way to ask, but I need to know urgently!
Thanks a lot. -- Amit  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.131.76 (talk) 09:48, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Janmashtami 

message: It may be interesting to note in this article that there has been a longstanding legal battle between the Tenkalai Brahmin community, the traditional proprietors of the temple, and the government of the state of Tamil Nadu (specifically the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Administration) over control of the temple. Details can be found in the work of Arjun Appadurai. Ancient Infant (talk) 08:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temple Administration / Politics 

message: The Incidents section looks perfectly sourced and written from a neutral point of view. Hence, I am removing the tags. Please leave a reason here before adding the tags back.  --Anbu121 (talk me) 18:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incidents section 

message: This temple is talked about by Peyalvar (The 3rd Alvar), who lived in the 7th Century(no later than that). How can we say that the temple was built in the 8th century by Pallavas? The last alvar- Thirumangai alvar who lived and died in the 8th century has also talked about the temple. Some clarification is needed on this.
The temple's website claim that this is the oldest temple in the city-which puts it before the 7th century Kapaleeshwarar temple in Mylapore(and hence-possibly the first building to be constructed in the Madras/Chennai area)
http://www.sriparthasarathyswamytemple.org/ 
(Click on the history tab to see their claim)
Kaushikr (talk) 06:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of temple
Talk:Periodic table (detailed)

message: I suggest this page be deleted because it is identical to Periodic table (large version). --Lucent 19:17, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
:I wouldn't say it should be outright deleted — it's got a nice, smooth feel that the large version lacks. Perhaps some of the formatting from this version can be merged into the large version (specifically, the smaller font size). æle ✆ 01:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't, you can't read the font on this page.  --PresN 20:30, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dammit, that will teach me to read the year part of the timestamp.  --PresN 20:31, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fayth

message: After the merger with the Pyreflies article, I've been thinking "Do we really need all these FFX pages?" I know FFX goes into a lot more detail about the world than most Final Fantasy games, to say nothing of how much more detail it goes into than most games in general. That said, despite all that's been done to improve it, Wikipedia looks like a Final Fantasy fansite. Cloud's page looks like a biography, Advent Children's looks like the reports that came out of Venice when the film was first screened there, just yesterday I had to merge Ultima Weapon with Weapons, and here we've got eight pages talking about Final Fantasy X alone; that's not including character pages:
*Final Fantasy X
*Spira
*Yevon
*Blitzball
*Al Bhed
*Sphere Grid
*Fayth
*Final Fantasy X: Original Soundtrack
I'm not excluding the other Final Fantasies from this either. Final Fantasy VIII and Final Fantasy IX are actually decently condensed, I believe, but Final Fantasy VII is another guilty offender. Until recently, the bloody Sister Ray even had its own article, Midgar should be merged with List of Final Fantasy VII Locations, and Materia should be merged with Mako.
I'm going to be making some proposals over on the Final Fantasy VII pages too, but here, I think the following ideas should be considered:
*Blitzball should be merged with Spira if in any way possible; maybe at the very end.
*Al Bhed should be merged with Races of Final Fantasy (not a lot to say there to begin with, and plenty of overlap of material).
*Sphere Grid should be merged with Final Fantasy X (applies to only this game, and there's already overlap of material).
*Fayth should be merged with Yevon (there's really not much to say about the Fayth without talking about Yevon in the first place).
*Final Fantasy X Original Soundtrack should be merged with Final Fantasy X (how did it even get its own page to begin with?).
I'm for the Yevon page staying, and if there's a lot of objections to the Final Fantasy X Original Soundtrack page being merged out of individuality, so be it (can't see what there is to say about it that can't be said on the Final Fantasy X page, though); that would still take us from eight down to four.
I haven't even looked at the character pages that much, really, but I'm not going to worry about them for now. What's everyone's thoughts on this stuff? (Please direct discussion of these matters to the Final Fantasy X Talk Page) Ryu Kaze 08:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FFX Wiki Cleanup
Talk:NELIAC

message: Is there a policy on linking to ACM articles? You have to pay to read them. -(unsigned by 216.251.209.111)
:The ACM is like any journal: you cite it for references where appropriate. The fact that they happen to have a site we can link to is just a bonus. You could argue that the link in question belongs under references, but as it was not a reference used in creating the article, I'm not sure that it technically belongs in that section.
:Short answer: I don't think it's a concern. The ACM isn't trolling for hits on Wikipedia. -Harmil 22:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ACM

message: My first job was NELIAC on Burroughs.  This is a nice overview  I still have unclassified documentation for NELIAC, including "Users Guide to AOSP-Compatible NELIAC Compiler for the AN/GYK-3(V) Computer (Burroughs D825)" published by NavElex San Diego.  If you are interested, please email guycole at gmail dot com.
Hax4bux (talk) 21:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Overview=

message: The additions to this page are quite useful, but it is difficult to verify the details. Any assistance in finding citations for this information would be appreciated. I did remove the bit about ADA. It's seemed too anachonistic, since ADA wasn't even a request for specification until 1978... was NELIAC still active that late? -Harmil 05:05, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions
Category talk:Ottawa Senators

message: Do you think you can explain what you plan on doing with this at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey. The parent-child capabilities with categories is new to me. I have fuzzy ideas of where to go with this, but maybe you can help us out. There are 29 other teams that would potentially be affected by this. Thanks ccwaters 19:48, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Consensus was to keep, see archived discussion for details. ∞Who?¿? 21:14, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cfd 8 Sep 2005
File talk:Hand.svg

message: Mime type is possibly wrong, it should be "image/svg+xml" to work in firefox, see
http://wiki.mozilla.org/SVG:MIMEType
See m:SVG image support
This is one of the worst renderings of a hand I've ever seen. 207.112.36.15 (talk) 22:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Grapher

message: All known French & English documentation (including a new 83 pages manual, last edition April 16th 2014 by Mr. Yves Barois), downloadable freely on
  http://y.barois.free.fr/grapher/
 A lot of new examples on this website which is free of advertising.
 Yves Barois  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.65.109.155 (talk) 23:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grapher.app versions 1.1 to 2.5 Documentation (French and English) and examples 

message: General notice for editors: the link you have provided is out of date. Someone fix, if you can Xbony2 (talk) 01:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link 
Category talk:People with severe brain damage

message: This category is going to be a magnet for vandals. Geo. Bush, John Kerry,  etc  MPS 21:02, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They don't have to be alive. It implies that the person had severe brain damage while living. —User:Arual 14:01, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Henry Clay Frick

message: Yes and no.  He did buy St. Peter's Episcopal church, the site of the Frick Building, and donated the church back to the congregation.  It was dismantled stone by stone, and re-erected in the fashionable suburb of Oakland in 1901.  On the other hand, who is depicted in a Catholic church mural as Dives in Hell?  Is it HC Frick or Andrew Carnegie?Pustelnik 13:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: philanthropy?

message: This is an article which could very easily have proper sources for the statements, and a few good books and articles in the ==Further reading==. That it doesn't , might make some people wonder if the material might have been plagiarized, so get them in.DGG 00:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: sources

message: Several people were killed, including nine workers. Then the other guy sought vengeance for the seven workers killed. This needs good and accurate sources, presumably ones that include and categorize all the deaths in the strike, then consistency throughout.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.106.124 (talk) 18:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory information about strike deaths 

message: If you follow the link to the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club (and the Johnstown Flood), they provide additional information which contradicts the information in this article - it is clear all three article started from the same source, as they share substantial identical text.  
The Club did NOT "create" the earthen dam - the dam "was originally built between 1838-1853 by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as part of the Pennsylvania Main Line canal system to be used as a reservoir for the canal basin in Johnstown".    Frick was born in 1849.
This paragraph contains strong implications that Frick and his associates caused the Johnstown Flood for the purpose of wiping out their main competitor in the steel industry.  That's a pretty strong charge - given that the courts determined the failure to have been an "Act of God" following 6-10 inches of rain in a 24 hour period.  You may not agree with the outcome of a court decision, but they make the final determination of "fact".StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 03:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory information about the Johnstown flood 

message: So what did Frick do in those 25 years? patsw (talk) 02:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1893-1917 
Talk:Dje

message: This letter by no means could be called "Dje"; Serbian cyrilic letter simply do not have names. This is total nonsense. Saigon from europe 21:11, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: While this letter has no name in the Serbian language, this is an English wikipedia page and English speakers do name letters, even from alphabets for other languages. Coroboy (talk) 19:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

message: It seems to me that this article was written by people who can not distinguish Ђ from  Ћ ! This is totally false article, because original Serbian alphabet does contain Ђ but no Ћ ! Vuk Karadzic didn't touch this letter, because it is written on some 1000 years old churches all over the Europe where Serbs have lived ! 8000 years old Vinca scripture contains 22 original modern today's Serbian letters that is the base of Srbica, called Cyrillic, by Vatican's manipualtors who hide the Serbian Culture and Glory from you. Please, Wikipedia, HELP TRUTH SHINE OVER SRBICA and Serbian calendar that is in Years 8526 (not 2017) ! Genetic studies confirm that Serbs are the oldest European people too ! Stop manipulators, please !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.227.244.217 (talk) 13:06, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The original Cyrillic alphabet contains the letter Ꙉ (đerv), corresponding to Glagolitic ⰼ, not Ђ or Ћ. Vuk Karadžic himself asked for ideas on how to represent the sound đ; at first he used ДЬ, and later he adopted the symbol Ђ which Lukijan Mušicki designed. Lukijan Mušicki was an Orthodox bishop, so your idea that this is "Vatican's manipulators" makes no sense. Vinča script has nothing to do with Cyrillic or Serbs, it was used thousands of years before the Slavs migrated to the Balkans. Frankly, this kind of nationalist conspiracy-mongering is embarrassing. Vorziblix (talk) 13:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ђ or Ћ ? 

message: ￼pusih by Wikipedia 125.162.210.116 (talk) 06:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dje 
Talk:PP

message: What does pp mean when referring to page numbers? Teachers always write something like "read pp 51-53," but I can't figure out why. It's only used for multiple page numbers, never "read pp 43," but that's all I've been able to figgure out.
:I was given to understand that in a few cases double-letters are used to indicate a plural of the abbreviation. Perhaps in this case to avoid confusion with ps, or p.s.? — RJH
*pp means paginae (latin: = pages), used for page numbers. Scriberius 11:19, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a common practice in referring to plurals of items like this to use double letters when the singular is represented by only one letter. Another example is ff for "folios following" (a folio has a number of different interpretations but one relates to the number marked on a page (as opposed to the actual page count - the physical page may be, say, 7, but the number marked on the page might be "2"). A single page following would be simply "f". Yet another example is "vv" for verses. AncientBrit 15:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why didn't you guys go add pp., ff., and vv. to Wikipedia? ;) --Kjoonlee 07:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PP page numbers 

message: See the discussion in Talk:Pope_Benedict_XVI/Archive10#Latin patsw 17:20, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: added - before seeing this :) -- 93.198.240.230 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently there is some confusion as to wether it means "Papa Pontifex" or "Pastor Pastorum". But "Papa Pontifex" certainly isn't "Latin for sheperd of sheperds" as it's stated in the article. What to do about this? --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 12:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  PP Pastor Pastorum 

message: The 'Naughty Terms' section should be deleted. PP does not equate to penis... WinterSpw (talk) 00:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Naughty Terms' section deletion? 

message: It also means the mentioned, but I dunno where to sort it within the stored stuff...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.65.32 (talk) 03:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product Placement 

message: "Procuration" is referenced twice, once in Office admin, once in others.
Which one should be removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.145.197.13 (talk) 04:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the first one. W. P. Uzer (talk) 07:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate entry: per procurationem
Talk:Prudence Crandall

message: There is far too little information about Prudence Crandall in this article about that lady.  When forced to move, did she create other schools?  This is somewhat unclear.  Did she struggle to oppose the laws passed against her schools?  The whole is greatly encumbered with far too much interesting information about the nature and mechanisms of American slavery and Connecticut patterns of slavery;  this information should, perhaps, be better included under articles under those names.Grantsky (talk) 15:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Focus on the article subject

message: I've a question.  The first section reads "she ran the first school for black girls ("young Ladies and little Misses of color") in the United States"but I think this is both incorrect and misses the mark. Because she was teaching a class of White girls only, and a Black girl/young woman joined them, Prudence Crandall is more properly remembered as teaching the first integrated classroom in the USA. This sentence tends to celebrate the fact that White parents took all their girls out of the classroom--and I am sure that this is not why Ms. Crandall is the Connecticut State heroine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christiancrandall (talk • contribs) 16:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Category talk:Wikipedians by programming language

message: Notice how Category:User instruments has a way
for people to keep their instrument skills separate
from their language skills.
Shouldn't we have a similar mechanism for to
keep our (programming/formatting/data manipulation)
language skills separate from our natural language ones?
Jamie 23:45, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use a separate babel box? 

message: Is it necessary to have this underneath :Category:Wikipedians by language? I mean, it's not a language that people use to directly communicate with each other, is it? No one writes love letters to their sweetheart in Java... right? —ScouterSig 21:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parent cat
Talk:Dianic tradition

message: I do not think it would be correct to merge this article on Dianic Tradition with Dianic Wicca; Dianic Wicca is only one branch, and possibly the minority expression, of the Tradition. I understand Wicca is essentially a dualistic religion which honors both God and Goddess. Most Dianic tradition pracitioners are monotheistic or panentheistic, and are committed to Goddess worship. To ignore this fundamental difference in belief because they are both Goddess worshipping pagans would be similiar to ignoring differences of Catholics and Protestants because they are both Christian.
Should Dianic Tradition be merged with Dianic? SC 03:07, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:Anuak people

message: The Anuak, like many of the White Nile tribes, are known for their often spectacular stature. Individuals as tall as 7'6" have been reported.
I object the use of the term River People!! What does that mean?
Nolawip 03:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have been doing research on the economy and ways of living for the Anuak people and I am looking to add my information about it. 
SamuelFireCatcher (talk) 14:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding New Content 

message: In my perspective, Native the spelling "Anuak" Shouldn't  even get included in the article as the name of the nation, and this is because it's not spelled correct when compared to how natives  pronounce it.  And if it is to be included, it should be written as an alternative for the nation's name. Nelson Samson (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  " Anuak " is an incorrect  spelling
Talk:Karankawa people

message: This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Adena Park, Ehimawan.
:I don´t know hot to write a comment of my own, so I am using this. Sorry for the inconvenience. I found the text very bias, a lot of mentioning of Spanish atrocities or attacks commited against the Karankawa, and not many references to those commited by te anglos or new texans, when in fact they became extinct after the foundation of Texas. Locolocal88 (talk) 09:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: I have never made a Wiki edit before, but there is a section I believe needs some clarification:
Encounters with the Spanish.
This text section incorrectly states that the "first" encounter with the Spaniards was in 1697.  Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca wrote The Relation in the 1530s (published in 1542) about his time with this tribe.  de Vaca was a Spaniard on a journey under the Spanish crown.  His group was limited in size (devastated by a hurricane, desertion, and starvation), so they weren't the colonial force they set sail with.  Even so, it seems silly to label the first encounter as having taken place 150 years later than it did. 69.132.112.46 (talk) 22:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: It would be too easy to excuse the Karankawa as not practicing some form of Cannibalism. Early reports describe the act vividly.
Cannibalism was by no means practiced only by the Karankawa, as many early explorers have encountered the practice within a number of native tribes in the Americas.
:Relax, many scholars believe that the people they study were just like themselves and refuse to believe that people formerly waged war on each other an even ate each other. It is called the Historian's fallacy.--Wiglaf 09:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: It would be too easy to excuse the Karankawa as not practicing some form of Cannibalism. Early reports describe the act vividly.
Cannibalism was by no means practiced only by the Karankawa, as many early explorers have encountered the practice within a number of native tribes in the Americas.
Relax, many scholars believe that the people they study were just like themselves and refuse to believe that people formerly waged war on each other an even ate each other. It is called the Historian's fallacy.--Wiglaf 09:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Are the members of the heritage group actually descended from or genetically related to the Karankawa people? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Heritage group
Talk:Gender changer

message: All that crap added by User:Hipheks seems to be vandalism to me... even added a "Hello World" remark, and only THAT was interpreted as vandalism. I say remove that damned thing already. --69.140.24.166 23:05, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind - I'm going ahead with it anyway. --69.140.24.166 23:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC)