lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:International Indian School Jeddah

message: The school diary mentions there ae about 13,000 students, not 15,000 as written in the left column.Fauzan (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That was then. Now the text says 12,000 and the infobox 13,500. Which is it, or rather, which can be sourced? (I saw the figure 12,000 on the school's website.) Bishonen | talk 20:32, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Students 

message: There was much too much triviality in this article. Drmies has removed some of it, and I've removed some. All schools have the kinds of facilities described, unless they're just little village schools. And this one has 12,000 students (or 13,500, see above) and Indira Ghandi laid the foundation! How on earth could it not have Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Mathematics, Computer Science and Home Science labs? Or libraries with reference and reading areas? (What kinds of libraries anywhere don't have both those types of areas?) My own secondary school, with one tenth the number of students, had all that stuff.
It would be nice if somebody would like to add more information that's interesting and relevant, to take the place of the removed trivia. For instance, the separation of boys and girls is only hinted at. Gender-separated library sections are quite unusual in most parts of the world. Could somebody write up the subject of girls more fully? Questions that come to mind are: are there equal numbers of boys and girls? Has the school been open to girls right from the start, or when did it become so? Drmies removed the "Sections and blocks" section, very reasonably, but would somebody like to write up the intriguing hints about gender separation that got removed along with that section? I'm thinking of sentences like  (What exactly is a "separate shift system"? That may be obvious to you, but it isn't to me.) Please give some more focus to that theme, it's good stuff; never mind the trivial list of blocks and sections and letter codes and numbers.
What ages are the school for, exactly? The introductory section says it's a secondary school. But the "Courses offered" speaks of primary and secondary levels, and the removed "Sections and blocks" section even mentioned Kindergarten. That's quite confusing. Bishonen | talk 20:32, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree on the trivial nature of this article. The problem here is the lack of or disorgonised sources which give parts of information, the rest depends on the familiarity of a person. The school has all the classes from KG to 12th. About the gender separation topic, it found a place in the erstwhile Sections and Blocks. Maybe the section can be revived without the trivial info? Another thing is the poorly maintained website which fails to give more information.  Fauzantalk ✆ email ✉ 08:38, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of trivial details + request for more pertinent information
Talk:Cain tradition

message: "Among Hebrews and Christians it was believed that Cain and his descendants were instruments in Satan’s plan for the destruction of man" - can you provide a reference??? Danielcohn (talk) 22:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm finding sources that do mention a "Cain Tradition", but not really anything that is specifically about this theory as it is written. There are various different theories out there that use this term (such as this book that talks about the devil as Cain's father) and I'm leaning towards this being almost completely re-written if it is to be kept. In other words, make it less about this specific theory and more about the usage of the term in general. The article as it's written now is pretty much almost complete OR. I'm going to use this section as a dumping source for the stuff I find, but I'm slightly leery about this because it's going to be so easy for it to turn into OR and view pushing if we're not careful. I'm almost thinking that this might be better as an article entitled "Theories about Cain", but I'm not quite happy with this title either since it's sort of WP:POINTy.Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *, , , , , , , , , .  I'm finding stuff, but this is kind of daunting in how much work it entails and how carefully all of it'll need to be written. The term is used, but it's not exactly used in a very specific manner. This might be best summed up in a few sentences such as "People have used the term 'Cain Tradition' to refer to several different concepts or theories about Cain, his lineage, or about other aspects of his nature." That's not perfect and not exactly the sentence I'd use, but that's kind of what most of the books and journals above summarize as in a nutshell.Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not exactly right...
Talk:Evangelical Climate Initiative

message: *http://web.archive.org/web/20070712082826/http://pub.christiansandclimate.org/pub/statement-booklet.pdf
*http://web.archive.org/web/20110725165253/http://christiansandclimate.org/learn/call-to-action/what-others-are-saying/ 
*http://www.telegram.com/article/20070826/SUMMERSERIES/308260006
*http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2006-02-10/news/0602090930_1_climate-change-warming-evangelicals
*http://articles.philly.com/2006-02-09/news/25409179_1_evangelical-climate-initiative-global-warming-evangelical-christian-leaders
*http://www.npr.org/documents/2006/feb/evangelical/history.pdf
*http://www.npr.org/documents/2006/feb/evangelical/newsrelease.pdf
& — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnotherWordForNothing (talk • contribs) 01:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  some sources unused yet in the article 

message: What is ECI's relationship with ESA - Evangelicals for Social Action, who had an interest in the OTHER ESA, the Endangered Species Amendment? May I suggest that ECI's 'prehistory' or predecessors (around 2000 and before) might be worthy of further study and discovery? MaynardClark (talk) 00:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older history
Talk:Eurofest '75

message: F197	7/25-8/2/1975	c	66	Heysel Stadium, Brussels	Annie Vallotton (Switzerland); Evie Tornquist (USA); Chora Lerna (Sweden); Treklangen (Finland); Festo Kivengere, Anglican Bishop of Uganda.	Nicodemus	Text: John 3. Offer: Cruden's Concordance. This program is really a documentary about Eurofest. At beginning is a lengthy section about Brussels. USE V5.    Xhyljen (talk) 16:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Islamic Front for the Iraqi Resistance

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Islamic Resistance in Iraq (2004–2017) →  – I'm pretty sure this article was only moved because it was mistaken for the Islamic Resistance in Iraq. Charles Essie (talk) 13:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 19 April 2024
Talk:Lyndon LaRouche/research

message: ===General===
Howard Blum and Paul Montgomery, "U.S. Labor Party: Cult Surrounded by Controversy," New York Times, October 7, 1979, and "One Man Leads U.S. Labor Party on His Erratic Path," New York Times, October 8, 1979
Gregory F. Rose, "The Swarmy Life and Times of the NCLC," National Review, March 30, 1979
Ideological Odyssey: From Old Left to Far Right January 14, 1985
Chip Berlet and Joel Bellman, 1989, Fascism Wrapped in an American Flag, Political Research Associates. online version.
Chip Berlet, “Ever Hear of Lyndon LaRouche? He May be Keeping Tabs on You,” Des Moines Register, 9/23/81, syndicated by Pacific News Service.
Chip Berlet. “Lyndon LaRouche and the U.S. Labor Party: Cult Fanaticism and the Politics of Paranoia,” Chicago Reader, 3/7/1980.
Who Are the American Family Foundation: Mind-Controllers Targetting LaRouche?  April 19, 2002
He's a Bad Guy, But We Can't Say Why Schiller Institute Website  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Will Beback (talk • contribs) 11:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Topical sources

message: Howard Blum and Paul Montgomery, "U.S. Labor Party: Cult Surrounded by Controversy," New York Times, October 7, 1979, and "One Man Leads U.S. Labor Party on His Erratic Path," New York Times, October 8, 1979
Gregory F. Rose, "The Swarmy Life and Times of the NCLC," National Review, March 30, 1979
Ideological Odyssey: From Old Left to Far Right January 14, 1985
Chip Berlet and Joel Bellman, 1989, Fascism Wrapped in an American Flag, Political Research Associates. online version.
Chip Berlet, “Ever Hear of Lyndon LaRouche? He May be Keeping Tabs on You,” Des Moines Register, 9/23/81, syndicated by Pacific News Service.
Chip Berlet. “Lyndon LaRouche and the U.S. Labor Party: Cult Fanaticism and the Politics of Paranoia,” Chicago Reader, 3/7/1980.
Who Are the American Family Foundation: Mind-Controllers Targetting LaRouche?  April 19, 2002
He's a Bad Guy, But We Can't Say Why Schiller Institute Website  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Will Beback (talk • contribs) 11:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General
Talk:First International Congress on World Evangelization

message: This article has an error in the introduction--the World Congress on Evangelism was held in 1966 in Berlin, West Germany (http://www.lausanne.org/berlin-1966/overview.html)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavoth (talk • contribs) 18:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:International Federation of Free Evangelical Churches

message: Couldn't find this harsh formulation (obligatory yardstick) on the site, so I'll moderate it, since the Sw page doesn't contain this statement. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 10:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't even find any four point statement, they must be some reader's synthesis, so I replaced them for two clauses in the constitution, that IMHO have some theological relevance (?). ... said: Rursus (bork²) 10:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Obligatory yardstick"
Talk:Kerala Brethren

message: Should this page be renamed to become Kerala Brethren, with a capital B, as in Plymouth Brethren? DFH (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title? 

message: The general style of the main article needs further improving, and the factual reporting of events could be improved by providing properly cited references (include actual page numbers) to the sources listed in the later section. DFH (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style and citations 

message: Phrases such as "accepted the Lord", though common in Christian parlance, seem somewhat out of place in an encyclopedia article. I'm sure that members of the Kerala project team can give due consideration to finding better alternatives. DFH (talk) 19:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jargon 

message: Someone with the necessary geographical knowledge could transform all the Indian place-names to wikilinks, providing there are articles for each. Spellings vary a lot for Anglicised place-names, so proper care is need to ensure correct identifications. DFH (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian place names 

message: The article, particularly the sections on the history of Christianity in India, seem heavily biased toward the Brethren's view of history (i. e., they claim that the first churches in India were organized in a fashion similar to the Brethren, and that the Brethren's own practices are an authentic revival of the early church, neither opinion of which is universally held; I'm sure members of the Mar Thoma churches in India would strongly disagree with the sentiments in the article, for instance). A balanced perspective is needed. LonelyBoy2012 (talk) 07:41, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: I've begun cleaning this article up. It's poorly-written and full of POV. I intend to do most of the cleaning up over the weekend, but I've made a small start already. I intend to reorient the article towards a neutral point of view, fix the sometimes childish phraseology, and back up the remaining claims with citations. Please bear with me for a few days — this article is likely to get more messy before it gets better, as I tend to edit incrementally. David Cannon (talk) 13:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: There is a concerted attempt to confuse history. There was no Kerala anywhere in recorded history. 
Travancore one location and Malabar was another.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:D40B:6601:D09B:4E25:EA63:6E8A (talk) 09:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deliberate misinformation
Talk:Kids & Teens TV

message: Honestly, are the programming times in specific even necessary?--ForgottenHistory (talk) 06:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming
Talk:David Rothe

message: User:Shtove does not agree with the removal of :Category:People of Elizabethan Ireland, see [revert], despite the fact that David Rothe became notable in Ireland 7 years after the death of queen Elizabeth I. Imho the category removal was correct, per WP:COPERA, and should be re-implemented. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elizabethan Ireland
Talk:Middlebury Union Middle School

message: This article is far too long and is out of date. Wikipedia does not need an in depth list of school policies and staff - especially when the high school and other buildings in the area do not have pages of their own. I'm not privy to the inner workings of wikipedia  - does anyone have an opinion? I think the page should be cut down dramatically, or even deleted. --75.69.67.212 (talk) 04:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: relevance?

message: Does anybody have a picture of the School? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.65.162.140 (talk • contribs) 17:36, November 25, 2007
hey, the school is doing fine but i left my text book in my locker, can anybody help me with the science project?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.69.139.140 (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: School Picture
Talk:Wells-next-the-Sea

message: Cuisine section is very POV and not backed up with any sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.65.104.202 (talk) 21:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cuisine section
Talk:Evangelical Catholic/Archive 1

message: Especially "often seem contradictory to post-Reformational ears"... StAnselm 03:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: NOTE: The statements below which state that Lutheranism is the only Protestant denomination that confesses belief in the efficacy of the Sacraments are false. Anglicanism also confesses such a belief, including in some Anglican groups, belief in the true presence of Christ in the Eucharist. The belief of the true presence of Christ in the Eucharist is not universal among Lutherans either. Someone should correct the below content. I believe Episcopalians also believe in the efficacy of the Sacraments. There may be others as well. -- added by User:Dmuhleman (Talk | contribs) (10,376 bytes) (→Lutheran Evangelical Catholicity - added "note" at top of section)
this text was removed from main article, but may warrant discussion.
Aepoutre 17:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed content from lutheran section of article
Talk:Castle Toward

message: Why is an editor being allowed to erase Cowal from Wikipedia?   When places are located in Cowal, Cowal being in the article is pertinent to the page! There are multiple examples of this happening, latest I have noticed is on the “Dunoon Peir” page
This personal vendetta against Cowal seems very suspicious! 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:1C2F:580C:79B6:CA4C (talk) 18:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The erasing of Cowal from Wikipedia 

message: Toward Castle is a scheduled monument (SM300) and should have its own article, not a add on to another article. https://portal.historicenvironment.scot/designation/SM300 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:2419:2126:DC52:AC85 (talk) 07:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toward Castle should have own article.
Talk:Whitnash

message: I tried to cleanup the article, especially the Warwick Gates topic. More input would be welcome! Widefox (talk) 09:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Southern Congregational Methodist Church

message: Is this organization still around? 74.192.165.180 (talk) 04:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye, but they're a bit reclusive. Try joining this Facebook group and you'll see my point: https://www.facebook.com/groups/465363120218336  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.165.180 (talk) 01:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:VPU

message: If there are only two items (and especially since one doesn't have a page yet) then maybe a separate disambiguation page isn't needed -- only a "for ... see ..." at the top of one of the article pages.  See Template:Otheruses, Template:Otheruses4, Wikipedia:Disambiguation (although I looked at that last page and didn't find guidance about having disambiguation pages for only 2 topics -- maybe I missed it.) --Coppertwig (talk) 01:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Student Volunteer Movement

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=PjEXAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=u0fPAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 22:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publications
Talk:Wombwell

message: Wombwell is not pronounced woon well. It is pronounced as it looks woomb well  or like wumbwell depending on how strong your Barnsley accent comes through.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.13.44.109 (talk) 00:14, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Woodbridge, Suffolk

message: Does anyone know where the Quaker meeting house was and when it closed? Bmcln1 (talk) 18:52, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Placing a link to the BBC report on this new discovery, which will merit addition to the article once more information is published.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-44455266
{The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 12:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neolithic henge 

message: The recently added text says that Beth is a notable horologist and lived in Woodbridge.  I can find no reference to her using Google and the source recently added also has no mention of her.  Please provide evidence that she existed or I will need to remove the statement again.Phil Holmes (talk) 14:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beth Blackmore
Talk:World Gospel Mission

message: Despite a list of about 15 items for "Further reading" there is just one reference and that is for a minor point. Further reading, "good" works though it be, is not WP references.--SilasW (talk) 19:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references 

message: This articles needs serious downsizing. Please help by removing uncyclopedic material. รัก-ไทย 06:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be summarized 

message: I am an employee of World Gospel Mission, and seeing as this page is in desperate need of condensing and updating (nearly ten years since a legitimate update), and since there is relatively little traffic to this page and thus a low probability of any outside edit at all, I think it is best if I go forward with editing this article. I am stating my affiliation/conflict of interest here, as this FAQ page says is required.
Because this is a low-priority page, I doubt that anyone will really see this. But I welcome an outside reviewer/editor to look over the changes once they are done in order to ensure that any inadvertent bias is removed.
Alexgergely (talk) 19:29, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization affiliation 

message: Cut about ~6000 words, added an infobox, and updated/condensed references and broken links. Stayed as neutral as possible. Would appreciate an outside look if anyone comes across this.
Alexgergely (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large revisions.
Talk:Richard Quiller Couch

message: Seems to be copied word-for-word from Dictionary of National Biography. Edited by Leslie Stephen. Volume 12.  --Coppertwig (talk) 01:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is - but the old DNB is Public Domain. DuncanHill (talk) 01:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

text: As very clearly stated by the use of the DNB template the text of which can be read in the "Sources" section of the article. DuncanHill (talk) 01:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologize.  I didn't see the DNB template when I put the copyvio tenplate on.  I guess it's not a copyvio after all.  --Coppertwig (talk) 02:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source of text
Talk:Billington, Bedfordshire

message: When, in 2006, I added the Will of Richard Marten of Great Byllington as a reference, I included:
:Note that this is the only record in their online catalogue for the place "Great Billington", compared with 225 records for "Billington".
as part of my evidence for changing the name of the article from "Great Billington" to "Billington, Bedfordshire".  It was true, but I now realise it counts as original research, so I have removed it from the article. JonH (talk) 12:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text
Talk:Church Growth

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Churchianity

message: This page needs to be deleted and merged into the appropriate article. Possibly christian glossary.
--Editor2020 (talk) 20:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. If there were more information, specific examples (although I think we can find these pretty easily by going to church on Sunday) or some other details here it might be worth keeping, but as it is it doesn't merit its own page. Is there a Christian glossary here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.26.197 (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Glossary of Christian terms insists that terms given must have their own articles, in order to eliminate cruft; perhaps a merge into Sunday Christian? --tiny plastic Grey Knight ⊖ 15:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Why not move it to "Christian Church", as part of the "visible and invisible church" section?  I suppose the "other debates" section of that article would be a good fit for it, too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.209.9.194 (talk) 21:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge away?
Talk:Complete variety

message: Can anyone give a reference? for the concept of complete variety, and for completeness of projective varieties.
thanks.
I don't think that the following sentence is clear enough:
it will except in very simple cases have more closed sets.
If I understood the meaning correctly we should add to commas at it as follows:
it will, except in very simple cases, have more closed sets.
If it is true please add the commas so it would be more readble. Otherwise change it in a way that a typical math student can easily understand it.
Thanx,
01:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comments