lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:High 'n' Dry

message: How did this article disappear? --Machchunk | make some noise at me 02:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???? 

message: I have removed the following sentence:
"Its video parodied The Young Ones with band members playing the roles." This isn't correct.
The only similarity is that they're in a messy house; It's just a low-budget video. They certainly don't imitate the characters in the Young Ones. Rocker1982 (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Me and My Wine Video 

message: This is a heavy metal album. 108.81.33.59 (talk) 23:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly the song "High 'n' Dry" was listed by VH1 as the 33rd best heavy metal song of all time, but the references describing the whole album as heavy metal are not so easily found.  found three unreliable references: Last.fm, defleppard.com and discogs.com. What is needed are prose reviews which say the album as a whole is heavy metal. The Allmusic prose review calls it hard rock. Binksternet (talk) 15:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

text: 108.81.33.59 Most tracks have a very slow rhythm. On the guitars, distortion is made by overdrive without major support from bass lines and the drums accompanies all melody. Out the sound, that totally reflects AC/DC. To avoid these conflicts is best remove the genre section or just put "Rock". Hard Rock and Heavy Metal are many similar by have origins and influences in common, but have differences that should be noted. It is less stressful not label a artist or music all the time.--Fran1996 (talk) 22:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop changing the genres 

message: The musical genre section was removed because of constant changes without reference or concrete bases.--Fran1996 (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre removed 

message: "Switch 625" is featured at the end of the Season 4 Finale of "Cobra Kai" 2601:541:8201:910:68B2:2FE:60E6:69E4 (talk) 00:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cobra Kai
Talk:On Through the Night

message: I just fixed the credits to better reflect the album notes, and referenced it (see Template:Cite_album-notes).  However, as the preferred release for this album is likely 9102040 (that would be the original U.K. vinyl release), someone who owns this version should check the credits, fix any discrepancies and change the details of my citation to those for the original version.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeagler (talk • contribs) 19:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album notes reference 

message: I will be removing the "Getcha Rocks Off" single from the infobox and intro.
There is no trace of this song being released as a single from this album.  The band's web site single discography does not have either "Getcha Rocks Off" or "Rocks Off" as a single.  Nor do discogs.com or rateyourmusic.com.
The single currently listed in the infobox states "Released: September 1979 (UK only)".  This almost certainly refers to the Vertigo reissue of the band's 1979 debut EP.  45cat.com has this release giving a release date of July 13, 1979 (catalogue # Vertigo 6059 240).
The intro discusses the single saying:
: The single "Getcha Rocks Off" included the songs "Ride into the Sun" and "Overture". 
which matches the 1979 Vertigo EP on 45cat.com.
Wantnot (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing "Getcha Rocks Off" single
Talk:Love over Gold

message: I think the genre should be changed to "Progressive Rock", since it was their attempt, and mostly an accomplished task nihil 01:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Love over Gold'' as Progressive Rock 

message: What is the software producing the digital display on the back of the sleeve - some sort of music editing program?  Drutt (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital display 

message: I'm sorry, buddy, but this album is very far from progressive rock. Mark Knopfler does not have a progressive mind and a progressive style. Long tracks are not enough indication to have progressive rock. Please change the genre indicating only "rock". Do you think in 1981 a progressive rock record could had rankings like this, in every chart?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.16.193.51 (talk) 13:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Determining genre based on chart performance is rather silly, but yes, for someone to label Love over Gold as progressive rock has to make you suspect that person has no idea what the term progressive rock means. Checking the cited source (which was not in place when the above post was made), it's obvious in context that Allmusic are not calling LoG progressive rock, but simply making a comment on the length of the songs by alluding to a genre which is known for including long songs. "Art rock" is an equally dubious description for LoG, and the cited source's phrasing ("The moment where Dire Straits became an art-rock band.") sounds tongue-in-cheek. Besides, I tend to question the reliability of an article which says LoG has seven songs. I'm going to remove those two genres and add the one which Allmusic categorizes LoG under, pop rock. Martin IIIa (talk) 23:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progressive Rock
Talk:Making Movies

message: Additional personnel?  Seems like overkill.--Milicz 18:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As near as I can tell, he was in the studio to play Mark Knopfler's parts during rehearsals (so they didn't have to use tape), but did not record anything that wound up on the album. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 22:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sid McGinnis
Talk:Full Circle

message: Sorry for the random references to "reading" in my edit summary just now; obviously I accidentally auto-filled with a summary from editing another page. Propaniac (talk) 16:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem - your clean-up is an improvement! - Ahunt (talk) 16:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit summary
Talk:Morrison Hotel

message: I was curious if anyone else has a mislabeled album.  My second side is the second side of the soft parade.  I bought this album new in the eighties.  Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pontopup (talk • contribs) 06:00, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  mislabelled album 

message: The article mentions the real-life Morrison Hotel, but what about the Hard Rock Cafe on the back cover of the album? Presumably it's not related to the later Hard Rock Cafe, but it existed, I guess in downtown Los Angeles, street number 300. Was it notable in any way apart from being part of the packaging for this album?  -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 15:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard Rock Cafe 

message: Frank Hoffman does not say that this album is roots rock. Rather, he says that the band was "exploring musical territory akin to roots rock 'n' roll," which is not such a solid statement of genre. See this page of his encyclopedia. Binksternet (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roots rock? 

message: i added moog synthesizer to the list of keyboards that ray played. a tape reel of "waiting for the sun" documents that there is a moog track among the other 2 keyboard tracks listed on this track.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.12.168.130 (talk) 00:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the personnel and instrumentation info is taken from the 2007 Rhino reissue with liner notes by Botnick and Fricke. If there are other reliable sources that provide additional details, please provide links or quote the appropriate passages. This is needed because there has been so much vandalism and false claims on Doors articles. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  moog synthesizer
Talk:Other Voices (The Doors album)

message: This is the first Doors album sporting a different logo for the name. I've read -- can't remember where -- that the logo was purposefully changed to reflect the fact that this is for all intents and purposes a "new" Doors. While some might argue that this line-up is not an actual "Doors line-up", should the article reflect this logo tidbit? If someone can find any reference(s) to it, please add. 128.214.133.2 07:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo
Talk:The Soft Parade

message: Far too much opinion.
I agree. 195.93.21.3 16:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article reads like a review 

message: I faintly remember a discussion/interview(?) with the Doors' present management regarding a possible re-mixing of the album, akin to the Beatles' "Let It Be -- Naked". Meaning, naturally, the songs performed in quartet format, instead of being backed up with the (arguably sugary, by present day standards, at least) strings and horn sections. Of course, this would be somewhat of a cop-out as well, since the Doors did use additional studio musicians on their later records. Does anyone else have any info on this? Has anything of this been publicly disclosed in any reliable media (seemingly the 'Net doesn't count)? Be that as it may, it would be a very interesting album. Arguably a lot better, as well. --Tirolion 08:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Naked Parade?

message: Doesn't say in the first sentence.
Nandor1 (talk) 02:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which album in the chronology?
Talk:El Cielo (album)

message: "The painting was unveiled in 1944 and contains references to many of the album's core themes and song titles" This sounds strange: Like Dali is making references to the album (obviously not so). I can't think of how to fix it at the moment... --Daev 06:18, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referring to motifs 

message: El cielo is listed on Biosphere Reserves in Mexico. Pixeltoo 12:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that section per WP:V and WP:OR -- everything on Wikipedia needs to be cited to a reliable source. Here is the link for the text I removed: if you can find a source to prevent this from being OR, feel free to include it, but as it stands now, it's not valid for inclusion. Kane5187 12:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Any reason the album article now directs to the band El Cielo?  I'm suspicious of the notability of the band, as they've only released one record and apparently aren't signed to a major record label (or a notable indie label).  Also, the article only has one source.  The album El Cielo seems to be more notable, so if nothing else, the band El Cielo should be renamed El Cielo (band) and any searches for El Cielo should redirect back to the album, which should have a disambiguation for the band.  This is assuming that the band is even notable enough to warrant its own article. :/ 68.221.216.19 (talk) 06:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Band?
Talk:Leitmotif (album)

message: All the site's I've checked have an alternate track listing for this album:
Track	Title                                                               	Length
1    	Movement I: @45° N. 180° W                                          	4:23
2    	Lechium                                                             	1:01
3    	Movement II: Crosswind Minuet                                       	6:24
4    	Traversing Through the Arctic Cold, We Search for the Spirit of Yuta	1:32
5    	Intermission                                                        	6:37
6    	Movement III: Lyndon                                                	3:07
7    	Penguins in the Desert                                              	4:13
8    	Movement IV: RR                                                     	2:59
9    	Yatahaee                                                            	3:44
10   	Movement V: 90 Hour Sleep                                           	20:20
* http://www.artistdirect.com/nad/store/artist/album/0,,1558325,00.html
* http://mog.com/music/Dredg/Leitmotif
* http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/2059977/a/Leitmotif.htm
I can't find the track list on the band's official site or Myspace page. The album is not on iTunes either, which would probably be a good source. Amazon agrees with the current listing. (http://www.amazon.com/Leitmotif-Dredg/dp/B00005NWLC)
69.20.226.218 (talk) 19:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track Listing 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 18:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Leitmotif 1999 Collage.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
Talk:Hotel California (album)

message: FYI regarding page moves above. Per discussion at User talk:Tariqabjotu#Hotel California page move I have made a bot request to make the necessary link changes. --RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me  06:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested automated help 

message: This article should not be in :Category:Fictional hotels, but Hotel California should. “Hotel California” is the only song about a fictional hotel, as well as the name of the hotel itself. Unfortunately, this page is semi-protected. 165.91.13.163 (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point.  Done. Happy days, LindsayHello 12:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: My request is to add information of each song from the album please so people know about each song, if it is not too much pressure. Yours sincerely, Jack. Ilikemusic67 (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ", nor cited reliable sources to back up your request.In any case, the most notable songs already have their own articles, and we would not want to duplicate that information in this article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2018 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. There was only one convincing oppose, but that oppose included acknowledgement that the Eagles album is more notable. There was consensus in support of the nomination rationale; At close to 100 times the pageviews the Tyga album, the Eagles album overwhelms all other usages and can be considered the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (closed by non-admin page mover) Polyamorph (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hotel California (Eagles album) →  – Seems to be the pretty clear WP:INCDAB primary topic to me. It's just this article and Hotel California (Tyga album) – between the two, this article takes 96% of the pageviews, while the latter takes 4%. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 December 2023
Talk:This Year's Model

message: It appears as the article's main author (great article!) Zmbro is claiming ownership of the article and does not allow additional content such as Costellos legendary performance at the Roskilde Festival shortly after the release of the album, and info about the different, high charting Swedish release of the album to be added to the article. It does seem that discogs.com is not considered to be a reliable source on wikipedia, but the LP itself is indeed a reliable source, and the hitparad.se source, stating that the album charted higher in Sweden than in any other country outside of the UK, is not questioned as an unreliable source in another section of the article. Also reminding that wikipedia articles should have a global perspective, not just focus on the UK and the US. Edo (talk) 18:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey there. I apologize if I came across as claiming ownership (that's never my intention). 1) The main issue your additions had were the use of primary sources () and unreliable ones (, ). The inclusion of an event such as the Roskilde Festival would depend on its notability in relation to This Year's Model itself. Graeme Thomson mentions the performance as being the live full band debut of "Oliver's Army", which is certainly notable, but as "Oliver's Army" is on Armed Forces, I personally don't believe it's notable to be included on this specific article (certainly on Armed Forces and "Oliver's Army"). That's how I see it at least. 2) When writing these articles, I try to always include chart placements of other countries (somehow that was missed on here). I have added these here. It would be better to have a secondary source for the Swedish track listing, but I guess the liner notes can pass. I'll get that added. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 19:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

text: How's that look? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 19:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted content
Talk:Embrace (American band Embrace album)

message: The liner notes on the remastered version of the album list tracks "12-16 recorded 2/86" implying the alternate versions (back of package lists "15 and 16" as "unreleased alternate versions") are from the second session, rather than the first. Unless someone comes along with more authoritative/"corrected" information, I'm changing the article to reflect this. FangsFirst (talk) 01:21, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonus Tracks Session Source 
Talk:Pictures at an Exhibition

message: Not enough in-line citations in this one in my opinion. The level of detail is good and large areas of the article are fine, but the "Movements" and "Arrangements" sections are definitely lacking. TheOneArmedBandit (talk) 06:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: It's beyond my expertise, but it seems like the article should have a section on notable recordings of the work. This should include the two recordings that have been inducted into the Grammy Hall of Fame.
Vladimir Horowitz's 1947 recording for RCA, and the 1951 recording by Rafael Kubelík, conducting the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, for Mercury. PatConolly (talk) 06:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable recordings. 

message: I am curious, would it be good to change some references to Kiev as Kyiv, as that is the more accepted Ukrainian spelling, especially after recent events? Or would that be unfaithful to the original title which is in Russian? Ajlee2006 (talk) 15:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think recordings and literature on Pictures uses "Kiev", so Wikipedia should, too. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kyiv 

message: I looked up pictures at an exhibition the gnome old castle children qurrale cattle and the great news there are images for them so can you please add them? 206.85.75.168 (talk) 21:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are pictures for gnoumus the old castle tulleries bydlo and limgoes 

message: There are pictures for the gnome to limoges please add them and there titles 206.85.75.168 (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movements 1 2 3 4 7 pictures
Talk:Vangelo di didimo thoma

message: The text appears at http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vangelo_di_Didimo_Thoma
:Sorry, my error, you are right. Not a copyright problem. Will revert the situation. Cat 11:17, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen the error of my ways and made the page into a redirect to the Enlgish page on the Gospel of Thomas. This will probably lead to the deletion of this page anyway. It seems unneccessary to me to include the complete Italian translation of thus Gospel on the English wikipedia. So I still think the removal was correct, but for the wrong reasons: I was a bit too hasty. The situation should be OK now I hope. Cat 11:23, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:August (album)

message: Eric Clapton just posted on his Facebook account that he was inspired to write "Holy Mother" after viewing Purple Rain. (If the film was released in Canada on the same date it was released in the U.S., then perhaps Clapton viewed it during, or immediately following, Roger Waters's 1984 North American tour in support of The Pros and Cons of Hitch Hiking.) --71.183.137.40 (talk) 04:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration for "Holy Mother"
Talk:Pilgrim (Eric Clapton album)

message: What, no discussion of this beautiful album?  I decided to look it up while sitting here listening to "River of Tears."  I can't say the whole album meets the stated theme, but from the first time I heard it, I stated flatly that "River of Tears" has to be the saddest sad song ever written.  Brilliant!  Tomligon (talk) 02:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:One More Car, One More Rider

message: What's the deal with him being on the personnel list? He doesn't seem to be shown on the DVD, and at the end, when Clapton is introducing band members,he doesn't name him? Was he there earlier on the tour, but not there the night this was taped, or something? Noel (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Greg Phillinganes
Talk:Baduizm

message: 3/4 star review by Greg Kot of Chicago Tribune. Transcribed using Google News Advanced News Archive Search:
Dan56 (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chicago Tribune review

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. USA Today (Jones, Steve. 06.D. February 11, 1997) review of Baduizm (1997):
Dan56 (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: USA Today review
Talk:Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This) (album)

message: I haven't heard the re-issue CD yet to check, but surely "Satellite of Love" isn't "previously unreleased"?
:It was issued in 1983 on a free cassette the came with the "Right By Your Side" 12", which had "Step on the Beast" and "Satellite of Love," a dub version of "I've Got an Angel" and sthg else I've forgotten...--feline1 09:37, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be "Invisible Hands" between "Step on the Beast" and "Angel dub" link The US CD says unreleased. Fixed per the cat's memory and the wonders of Google. --Fantailfan 00:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satellite of Love 

message: I'm pretty sure on this, because they say these in the song...  unsigned comment by 193.217.63.149 on 18:08, June 24, 2006
::are you trying to be funny?  He's we're sure. Why not take a holiday in Aberdeen, then Lennox's vocal pronunciation may make more sense to you... --feline1 23:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: excellent point! I always wondered. I am American and hence pronounce everything incorrectly.--Fantailfan 00:12, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sure it isn't "Sweet dreams are made of these" 
Talk:William Connolley

message: Should his Wikipedia (mis)adventures account for half of this biography? The section on his non-Wikipedia career (writing) is only about half of that of the section on his Wikipedia editing. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "(mis)adventures"?? - hmm. Anyway, if you see an imbalance - then grab some solid sources and expand his non-Wikipedia career section. Simple solution. Vsmith (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Apparently, the only rule that applies to this article is WP:IAE, which is fine with me, being an inclusionist. You won't find the sources Vsmith suggests because they don't exist; the subject fails notability outside Wikipedia. YoPienso (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight 

message: How many other "Senior Scientific Officer(s) in the Physical Sciences Division in the Antarctic Climate and the Earth System project at the British Antarctic Survey" are profiled? His name does not appear in the BAS article. 2A00:23C4:5107:3C01:E8D7:E2DD:8585:E8BE (talk) 18:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for article