Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics/Archive 2

message: Please read. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Workgroup-level quality statistics 

message: There's a discussion about :Category:Bharatiya Janata Party leaders and :Category:Indian National Congress leaders that started 16th October at  --Mereda 14:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change to party leadership categories 

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 15:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: You have a wonderful, well-organized project. I'm the coordinator of the medicine project. Could I steal your Collaboration opportunities and the Collaboration Dashboard. Magic ideas. :) NCurse  work 20:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I think there is no need to ask for it. All the texts are provided under GFDL license. Anyways the ultimate aim of the WikiProject is to improve the encyclopedia content. If it is good for that project it would be a little help to the medicine project from my side :)  Shyam (T/C) 21:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congratulations 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 20:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: The talk page of Integral humanism mentions the (stub) article to be maintained by this project. It appears to me that it could well be a self-promoting article (promoting linked and seemingly dubious sites), hardly more than a hoax, that should be deleted. Else it needs some reliable sources that prove the title to be genuinely notable. Before putting it up for deletion, I suggest members of this Indian politics project to have a look and if it is worth keeping, make a few essential improvements. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 15 Jan2007 08:46 (UTC)
:Yes, I do agree with you. I will work out on those politician pages as time permits. So please do not nominate them for deletion.  Shyam (T/C) 18:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its notable in Hindu circles and in conservative hindu parties like the BJP. Its not well-known but hardly a hoax. Deendayal Upadhyaya is quite an important figure in Hindu politics.Bakaman 02:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integral humanism 

message: As part of the Notability wikiproject, I am trying to sort out whether MCA 21 Project is notable enough for an own article. I would appreciate an expert opinion. For details, see the article's talk page. If you can spare some time, please add your comments there. Thanks! --B. Wolterding 13:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert review: MCA 21 Project 

message: Hi, I would request memebers of the POI wikiproject to give their opinion over the content of the Sonia Gandhi page at this RfC. I hope this is an appropropriate place for making such a request. Many thanks. ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments requested at RfC for [[Sonia Gandhi]] page 

message: TinucherianBot can automatically tag articles with  Banner as  to the talk page of articles without the project banner. It can also add the workgroup paramaters like "|kerala=yes|kerala-importance=" etc ,if needed. The currently supported workgroups are  Kerala,  Maharashtra,  Andhra pradesh, Tamil Nadu,  Gujarat, Bengal, Goa, Himachal Pradesh , Karnataka , Punjab,cities,  Cinema, Literature, Protected Areas of India, History, Politics, states, Geography,Maps,Districts and Tamil. 
If you need so, you need to provide me with the Categories to run the Bot. Due to some technical issues, the Bot will not run recursively to sub-categories. The requester should kindly verify that  there are NO non-related articles in the category. 
You may request for the bot run on my talk page... Thanks --   TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)      - 06:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: can you run the bot on the LS constituency pages? or maybe, wait till the last 3 are done. Lihaas (talk) 22:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Tagging with [[User:TinucherianBot|TinucherianBot]]

message: To help this workgroup patrol existing articles for vandalism/recent changes, Ganeshbot has created the Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Articles page. This page will be updated on a regular basis. Please do remind me if I forget. :) It contains articles that were tagged with the India banner and fall under the scope of this workgroup. Please let me know in case of any questions. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 11:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Watchlists

message: User:WolterBot has created a Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Cleanup listing page; it contains the articles that fall under the scope this workgroup and have cleanup tags on them. See this page for more information on this works. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 04:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup listings

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Indian politics 

message: Hi, I and one of my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of bias in Operation Blue Star article, the summary of dispute can be found at , please let us know your views so that 'alleged' bias may be looked into and a consensual solution may be found. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 05:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation bluestar bias debate 

message: Hi, I and my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of removing/toning down few lines on 'Allegations of Human Rights violation against the Indian Army' under 'criticism of the operation' section in Operation Blue Star article, concerns include WP:NPOV, WP:SOAP & WP:V, the summary of dispute can be found at . I would request all interested editors to kindly go through the article and please let us know your views/opinion at the talk page of the article so that npov, balance and undue weight concerns may be looked into and a consensual solution may be found. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 06:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for neutral opinion 

message: This article is one of the selected ones for collaborations of the month. Let us work together to improve this article.--GDibyendu (talk) 16:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Shripat Amrit Dange]] 

message: This article is one of the selected ones for collaborations of the month. Let us work together to improve this article.--GDibyendu (talk) 11:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lok Sabha]] 

message: nominated Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.Cirt (talk) 06:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR notice for Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. As it fails many aspects of the GA criteria I have de-listed it. When the issues have been fixed, it can be renominated at WP:GAN. If you disagree with the reassessment you may ask for a community reassessment at WP:GAR. You can see the concerns at Talk:P. V. Narasimha Rao/GA1. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA reassessment of [[P. V. Narasimha Rao]] 

message: Okip   00:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced living people articles bot

message: nominated Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. YellowMonkey  (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll)  01:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR 

message: The WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons (UBLPs) aims to reduce the number of unreferenced biographical articles to under 30,000 by June 1, primarily by enabling WikiProjects to easily identify UBLP articles in their project's scope.  There were over 52,000 unreferenced BLPs in January 2010 and this has been reduced to 32,665 as of May 16.  A bot is now running daily to compile a list of all articles that are in both :Category:All unreferenced BLPs and have been tagged by a WikiProject. Note that the bot does NOT place unreferenced tags or assign articles to projects - this has been done by others previously - it just compiles a list.
Your Project's list can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Unreferenced BLPs.  As of May 17 you have approximately 37 articles to be referenced, a 5.1% reduction from last week. The list of all other WikiProject UBLPs can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/WikiProjects. 
Your assistance in reviewing and referencing these articles is greatly appreciated.  If you have any questions, please don't hestitate to ask either at WT:URBLP or at my talk page.  Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Indian politics articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian politics articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I was reading up on the Mafia Raj article, and I must say the article is certainly well-written. The prose is good, everything is referenced; I do feel it is worthy of GA status. Perhaps this WikiProject can do something about this? Of course, it will be a good idea to add some context sections, such as 'Background' and 'History' to make the article even more comprehensive and all-rounded. FA shouldn't be too far off either. Just some comments for an outsider. Cheers, ANGCHENRUI Talk♨ 12:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting [[Mafia Raj]] to GA status 

message: I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of :Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:21, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject cleanup listing 

message: The article Kamraj Desiya Congress has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:A search for references finds only a single very minor published (gBooks) reference to the subject, fails WP:V and WP:N
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Kamraj Desiya Congress]]

message: Can an expert check if these are the same political splinter group please ?  Thanks - TB (talk) 23:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Shiromani Akali Dal (Panthic)]] / [[Shiromani Akali Dal (Panthik)]] 

message: I'm not an expert on the subject, but there has  been a lot of reverting going on at this article for the last few weeks.  If anyone with knowledge of the topic would care to look over the article and comment on the talk page, I would appreciate it. <B>—Torchiest</B> talkedits 01:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit-warring at [[Ram Rahim Singh]] 

message: Is this group still active? I'm interested in helping out with any articles related to Punjab Politics, I have good knowledge on the matter. 
Gsingh (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punjab Politics 

message: Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:Indian politics will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in Indian politics. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiWomen's History Month 

message: Name of this Article should not be just Basic Structure, as just the words basic structure are not in any way related to the Basic Structure Doctrine followed in respect to constitution of India. --Alok Bansal (talk) 07:16, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Article is moved to a new name, "Basic structure doctrine (Constitution of India)", as per the  discussion in the Noticeboard for India related topics. Alok Bansal (talk) 21:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the Article [[Basic Structure]] 

message: Asking about whether the article on the prominent and controversial Indian Hindu nationalist politican Narendra is currently neutral.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 21:43, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC on Nautrality at [[Narendra Modi]]

message: The first article above has no independent sources.  The second has sources, but is not the main article, and will soon be deleted as an abandoned Afc draft.  These two articles really should be merged.  Is there someone at this Wikiproject who knows how to do this and would be interested in working on it?  —Anne Delong (talk) 23:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Anne, I can help with this, but not sure, how to merge histories. — Bill william comptonTalk   02:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Bill.  I'm not sure either.  There's WP:Merge, but it talks about two existing articles rather than one article and one draft.  I have left a message at Wikipedia:Help desk#Rescuing information and sources from a page that may be deleted; maybe we can get some advice.  I'm sure that this situation has come up before.  —Anne Delong (talk) 03:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Himanta Biswa Sarma]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Himanta Biswa Sarma]] 

message: Is there a compelling reason why the page for the Kerala Legislative Assembly should be at Kerala Legislature rather than an official name? Hack (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Kerala Legislature 

message: Hi there.
Someone may want to have a look at List of political parties in India and List of recognised political parties in India.
List of political parties in India currently shows a subset of List of recognised political parties in India, when you'd expect it to be the other way around.  A lot of the content of List of political parties in India has been cut out. At one time it was basically the same as List of recognised political parties in India but with an additional list, of all the unrecognised parties.  The national parties were removed at some point and the unrecognised parties were removed with this edit.
I can kinda see why the list of unrecognsed parties was removed.  It looks rather long and pointless... but if we are not going to have it then what is the point in two separate articles?
Perhaps the best solution for unrecognised parties is to list only notable ones, i.e. those with there own article.
Anyone got an opinion on this?
Yaris678 (talk) 12:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of political parties in India]] and [[List of recognised political parties in India]] 

message: Hi all,
My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.
One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.
This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:
• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film
• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.
• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.
• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____
• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost
The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014
For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to: 
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 15:33, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaflet for Wikiproject Indian Politics at Wikimania 2014 

message: Dear Sir or Madam
Could you give me some information regarding memebers of the council from 8 August 1940.
I have the Viceroy and C-in-C of India but I want to know who was in the council, what portfolios they had and the dates they where in the job.
I would be greatful if I had the info. Mr Hall of England (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Viceroy's Executive Council]]

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: This is a notice about :Category:Indian politics articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 00:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert attention 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Could some knowledgeable person take a look at the following articles: Persons of Indian Origin Card, Indian nationality law and Non-resident Indian and person of Indian origin - and update these articles in light of the changes following the Person of Indian Origin Card (PIO Card) Amendment Scheme, 2014, and the merger of the Person of Indian Origin (PIO) and the Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) categories (see: , , ).  There also still seems to be a lot of outdated information on the web regarding this topic - including on many official Government of India websites. Any information or sources prior to January 2015 may now be outdated. Chris Fynn (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert help needed: POI & OCI 

message: An IP is making changes to this article. I don't know enough about the subject to counter any bias (whether already in the article or being added) but I suspect that these changes are not being adequately sourced, if sourced at all. Knowledgable eyes would be appreciated. Britmax (talk) 07:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today's changes to Indira Gandhi 

message: Many participants here create a lot of content, may have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more.  Well, these are just some of the skills considered at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.
So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:
*Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll
You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice to participants at this page about adminship 

message: Kindly review the following articles and suggest improvements:
* Lal Sena
* Indian People's Front
Sincerely yours,
Maaley (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to review

message: A Wikipedian has been deleting nearly all the content of All India Students Federation, the article lacks reliable sources but makes claims regarding notability. Paul foord (talk) 23:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: All India Students Federation

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    10:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    10:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: I've currently opened a peer review for Indian National Congress . I think the article meets the GA criteria and I'm thinking about nominating it as a GA candidate. It would be helpful if other editors could comment on the article and/or offer suggestions, etc. Thanks.Akhiljaxxn (talk) 07:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: I've started an RfC on changing the election/referendum naming format to move the year to the front (so e.g. French presidential election, 2017 becomes 2017 French presidential election). All comments welcome here. Cheers, Number 57 20:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This RfC has been reopened for further comment, including on using a bot to move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Proposed change to election/referendum naming format. Cheers, Number 57 15:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed change to election/referendum naming format

message: Look:
* 
is the most active user in the history of
* ,
but we can’t see any contribution by said user to the talk page. Moreover, the user seemingly does nothing but reverts others’ edits and also was observed to submit a questionable report against an opposing user as a vandal.  request an intervention by people who could understand what is going on with the article at first, and with the user also. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The person i have been reverting recently have been carrying out the same edits over and over again without explanation and in spite of being given warnings, and i reported this user less than an hour ago for his behaviour. If you are going to come with accusations you better have oversight of the whole picture first! One of my main tasks is to counter disruptive editing and vandalism, which is excactly what i have been doing in this case! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war in [[Communist Party of India]] 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: There is a discussion about the reliability of OpIndia and Swarajya on the reliable sources noticeboard. The discussion refers to citations of OpIndia in 23 articles, including List of riots in India and Shaheen Bagh protests, and citations of Swarajya in 305 articles, including Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 and Malala Yousafzai. If you are interested, please participate at . — Newslinger talk 02:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noticeboard discussion on reliability of [[OpIndia]] and ''[[Swarajya (magazine)|Swarajya]]'' 

message: There is a discussion about the reliability of Newslaundry on the reliable sources noticeboard. The discussion focuses on the use of Newslaundry on the OpIndia article. If you are interested, please participate at . — Newslinger talk 15:09, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noticeboard discussion on reliability of ''[[Newslaundry]]'' 

message: There is a noticeboard discussion on the Indian government's response to the content of the North East Delhi riots article. If you are interested, please participate at . — Newslinger talk 04:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noticeboard discussion on Indian government response to [[North East Delhi riots]] article