Talk:Hypochaeris radicata

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: The article says that catsear is safe for humans but poisonous for horses. Cans someone expand on that?174.6.130.25 (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Catsear Toxicity

message: Are Hypochaeris radicata and Hypochoeris radicata the same plant?  They seem to be, yet I don't see anything on this wiki to indicate they're synonyms.  Khono (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, found my answere here.  They are the same plant.  Undo my edit to the article if you have evidence to the contrary, please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khono (talk • contribs) 13:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Same Plant?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hypochaeris radicata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923203819/http://golfandsportsturf.com.au/article.asp?ArticleID=45 to http://www.golfandsportsturf.com.au/article.asp?ArticleID=45
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6VqJ46atN?url=http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls to http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311181041/http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/weed_info/Written_findings/Hypochaeris_radicata.html to http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/weed_info/Written_findings/Hypochaeris_radicata.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hypochaeris radicata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110221204206/http://www.seven.eques.com.au/health-pdf/Stringhalt.pdf to http://www.seven.eques.com.au/health-pdf/Stringhalt.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I took a picture of what I believe is a false dandelion for its forked stalk with multiple flowers, and identify.plantnet.org identifies it as Hypochaeris radicata whose stalk is supposed to be solid. However, when I broke a stalk, I found it to be follow. Could any false dandelion have solid stalks? --Roland (talk) 21:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypochaeris radicata stalk: solid or hollow