lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lakeview Terrace

message: *Samuel L. Jackson character upends stereotypes in 'Lakeview Terrace'
Headline for use. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 12:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Headlines

message: Found this in the lead section of the page. As noted when I made the edit, there is no source provided and it's a purely American point of view.
Here's the line that I cut:
:Despite its PG-13 rating, the film is aimed more towards an "adult" audience, as it contains more mature content (..Racism, violence, profanity, sexual content..) than most other PG-13 movies.
Nanorlb (talk) 18:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "adult" PG-13 

message: It's really poorly written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.104.131.240 (talk) 23:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did a 12 year old write the plot summary section? 

message: I've added a cleanup tag, as the plot outline has slightly bad sentence structure.— Dædαlus Contribs 09:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 

message: This seems an unfair summary of the movie. That's undoubtably a contributor, but it didn't seem the main one: the main factor seems to be them having sex in the pool and his kids seeing it. Any objections to striking this? --Steven Fisher (talk) 05:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the point of the film, Abel doesn't like the fact that they are an inter-racial couple, and says so on several occasions. If you didn't see that then you missed the point of the film. Darrenhusted (talk) 22:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

text: I really think you're both wrong that it's the whole point. There's multiple causes, though that's probably the biggest one. But I thought this over and decided to leave it alone anyway. --Steven Fisher (talk) 22:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead "because they are an interracially married couple" 

message: Question: has there been any contemporary reassesment of this movie in light of the events of the past decade? More than 10 years later, a movie about an african-american police officer harrassing an interracial couple seems extremely tonedeaf. 46.97.170.40 (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent reevaluations?
Talk:Roadside Romeo

message: Will this film be entirely in 3D, or will 3D be used only in certain places, alongside 2D animation? Esn 06:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the trailers I feel this will be entirely in 3D.--Adrian 1001 (talk) 23:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 3D?

message: Grammar, and accurate citations needed please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.75.6 (talk) 22:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception: cleanup 

message: There are some rumors that a sequel might be made, but nothing is announced yet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.107.245.37 (talk) 09:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sequel 

message: there should be some mention of the term "roadside romeo" and what it contextually means. Lihaas (talk) 18:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition
Talk:List of heaviest animals

message: This is a strange article. It covers very similar territory to the Megafauna and Largest organism articles, and the weights quoted seem to be a mix of averages, estimates, and world records. Some species that should fall within the range (Polar Bear) are missing. It's a nice idea, but it should be seriously cleaned up or deleted.PenguinJockey 04:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange 

message: List order apears to be incorrect, the fin whale is thought to be the world's second heaviest living organism and the sperm whale the third (reading from the wikipedia articles and accepted knowledge). Also orca are thought to be heavier then african elephants etc. I would not suggest using figures from this article without further research into thier origin and would suggest that this article does not represent an accurate order of size for the worlds largest living animals.
212.159.21.158 17:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innacurate 

message: This list badly needs working on to get accuracy. I'll do my best over the next few days. 
208.48.206.186 07:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Improvement 

message: I changed the pounds into kilos and the feet into metres. I know that if you live in the US that may kind of suck, but since most of the world uses the metric system, that including my country, I reckonned that would be best. :) 83.181.54.175 (talk) 14:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metric system
Talk:Armanitola

message: Armanitola was founded as early as 15/16th century, not 18 or 19th century. Armenians have come to Bengal much earlier than 18th century, please update this article accordingly. Shah Abbas of Persia (Iran) sent over 40,000 Merchants to Bengal (majority of which were Armenians). The Armenian Church itself was founded 1760's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.179.122.177 (talk) 15:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Armanitola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130606120456/http://theindependentbd.com/weekly-independent/86097-the-armenian-church-legacy-of-a-bygone-era.html to http://theindependentbd.com/weekly-independent/86097-the-armenian-church-legacy-of-a-bygone-era.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
 Alas, link rot set in before the first time the Wayback Machine archived the url Worldbruce (talk) 06:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:College (2008 film)

message: Removed the line "do not watch this movie," for obvious violation of NPOV.--Marvuglia (talk) 07:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

message: There's a conflict of data. "Release" states the film's budget was $6 million, while the infobox and "Critical reception" state the film's budget was $7 million. Can anyone clarify? —Mr Grim Reaper 03:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film budget: $6 million or $7 million?
Talk:Trouble in Tahiti

message: This page doesn't seem to be up to Wikipedia's quality standards. It reads almost like an undergraduate research paper on the opera. 
128.119.127.87 04:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or something cut and pasted from some website somewhere.--GuillaumeTell 10:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Still true 11 years later - I've flagged it for these problems. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 14:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Will someone remove those rules above and below lines? I don't know how. Thanks. Autodidact1 (talk) 08:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mean the marking in the paragraph "The opera also uses a vocal trio …" and the next one, they can be removed by adding sources that support their content. Alternatively, if no sources are forthcoming, those paragraphs will eventually be removed. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carl Wunsch

message: This article has been tagged for being a little too fleshy with the quotes. Perhaps the regular contributors to this page could make the necessary deletions to trim down the excess?
I'll keep it on watch and make the deletions myself in a few hours or so to keep it in compliance with Wikipedia guidelines. --Dean1970 04:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You deleted the quotes because they didn't fit your POV. Please don't do this. By all means add others; but CW's views on climate change are actually rather nuanced and interesting adnwell worth including William M. Connolley 21:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Dunno what you mean by ghosting guv. If you're suggesting I'm following you around... don't give yourself airs; use the history button William M. Connolley 21:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes

message: As a biography this article is pretty much worthless. There's nothing about Wunsch and his achievements. His greatest achievement (IMHO) is in correctly identifying the dynamics of the long-period tides as short planetary waves in a forced system with low Q (Wunsch et al., Dynamics of Long-Period Tides, Progress in Oceanography, V40 81-108, 1997). This problem has been around since the time Laplace and received much attention from Lord Kelvin. It's fair to say that Hank Stommel (Wunsch's PhD supervisor) invented oceanography, and Wunsch made it what is today.  Ketabatic (talk) 08:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article  Worthless

message: Having been working on several biographies on wikipedia, I found the excessive quotes that people discussed above to be not
appropriate for this biography, or an encyclopedia.  At the very least, the quotes make it appear that Wunsch's career and biography
is centered on this one unfortunate incident.  So I've removed the quotes and reduced the section down to a brief mention of the
documentary.  This article does need considerable development to describe Wunsch's quite notable career.  The article is still 
missing the mark quite badly!  Bdushaw (talk) 21:26, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes removed, article still needs development
Talk:2007 Siberian orange snow

message: This is about the namechecking of "Siberia" in the lead:
*  The word "Siberia" was present in the original stub.
*  Ezhiki deleted it without justification in February 2007.
**The idea was that the edit summary made the reasoning behind removal of the term "Siberia" clear, as a more specific term ("Omsk Oblast") was wikilinked during that same edit.  If it was not sufficiently clear, I apologize.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary and chronology

message: Answer to Ezhiki:
# Once again, I only said it was needed here for this very article because a "Siberian orange snow" should namecheck "Siberia" in its lead. I never said that "every subnational entity of every country" should be namechecked in every article as a rule of thumb, the rest is a straw man argument.
#:I don't mean to go in circles, but how would you justify namechecking "Siberia" in the lead of this article and not namechecking names of other locations in similar situations when a convenient term such as "Siberia" is not available?  Not to mention that you still fail to convince me that there is no redundancy in this particular case.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concerning standard naming of the places: in my opinion, the standard is "Tara, Omsk Oblast, Russia", which is exactly like "Eugene, Oregon, U.S." mentioned. Larger scale administrative divisions are not normally listed. I think the artcle name should be changed to something like "2007 orange snow near Omsk" to avoid the vague term Siberia anywhere in the title ro in the text. In fact the present article name wrongly suggests that the orange snow covered a huge area comparable to the size of Siberia. Goudzovski (talk) 15:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We could also change the name to Orange snow in Omsk Oblast (cf. Red rain in Kerala).  The year in title is redundant, unless orange snow fell in some other location in a different year.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just another argument for omitting the mentioning of Siberia: according to Wikipedia articles, the area of Siberia is actually larger than the one of the United States, so the term does not help much to specify the location. Goudzovski (talk) 09:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Further discussion
Talk:Honored Teacher of the Republic of Belarus

message: In accord with the terms of my bounty on Teacher of the Year articles, I have paid half-bounty of $25 US to the Wikimedia Foundation for this fine article.  Wikipedians, and people of Belarus, this bounty might still be doubled if a way can be found to promote the article to feature quality! :) Xoloz 04:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bounty
Talk:Australian Sevens

message: Article should be Australia Sevens, not Australian Sevens. See eg, Canada Sevens and France Sevens, not Canadian Sevens and French sevens. CUA 27 (talk) 00:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Ham105 -- The page name for this article is bugging me. I cannot move it to Australia Sevens because that page already exists as a redirect. To move the page, would that require an admin to get involved? Do you know how I would go about that? Thanks in advance. CUA 27 (talk) 03:05, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move?
Talk:IARC group 3

message: This is an inconsistent page title - the text says the members of the class are not classifiable. The title says they are carcinogens. Midgley 04:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: page title

message: It is my opinion that the current names of the articles and categories
* List of IARC Group 1 carcinogens, :Category:IARC Group 1 carcinogens
* List of IARC Group 2A carcinogens, :Category:IARC Group 2A carcinogens
* List of IARC Group 2B carcinogens, :Category:IARC Group 2B carcinogens
* List of IARC Group 3 carcinogens, :Category:IARC Group 3 carcinogens
* List of IARC Group 4 carcinogens, :Category:IARC Group 4 carcinogens
are misleading, since all agents (materials, compounds, environments) could and should be classified by IARC. The classification does not make them "carcinogens". The IARC itself mentions:
In the following lists, the agents are classified as to their carcinogenic hazard to humans in accordance with the Preamble to the IARC Monographs.
According to this text, we should have articles named:
List of agents classified from IARC to Group xxx as to their carcinogenic hazard to humans. Instead, I propose the simpler title:
List of IARC Group xx agents.
Similarly for categories, my proposal is:
Category:IARC Group 4 agents
Any alternative proposals are welcome. The present proposal is duplicated is all articles and categories, but if you have any comment, please use the page:
Talk:International Agency for Research on Cancer#Proposal to move several articles/categories to alternative names
Do not leave a comment in any other page.
--FocalPoint (talk) 13:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to move the article/category to an alternative name
Talk:Jonty Skinner

message: Jack Babashoff won the silver medal in the 100 meter freestyle in Montreal, not Joe Bottom who was sixth. However, I'm reluctant to replace Joe's name with Jack's because the phrase "beating home the Olympic champion and Joe Bottom who won silver in Montreal" is awkward given that neither Olympic champion nor Jack Babashoff  were at the meet in Philadelphia -- that whole sentence needs improvement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.156.68 (talk) 07:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To matriculate means to be enrolled at a college or university. You don't matriculate "from" something. Its incorrect use here makes the intended meaning unclear. Did he enrol at Selborne College but not graduate? Or is the term "matriculated from" being used incorrectly in place of "graduated from?"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.82.35 (talk) 19:40, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Matriculated from?
Talk:Firehouse Subs

message: A flag over two years old references a discussion which does not exist.
I'll be bold and attempt to remove such a flag.
131.96.244.139 (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Added information about Firehouse Sub's Under 500 Calorie Hearty & Flavorful menu introduced nationwide in March 2014. Naomirkennedy (talk) 21:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hearty and Flavorful Menu
Talk:Weardale Railway

message: Simmo676. Are you sure that the Darlington - Bishop Auckland line is known as "the Tees Valley Line"?. I always thought that the Darlington - Barnard Castle line (closed 1965) was the Tees Valley Line. regards. Bob BScar23625 05:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the fact that the Tees Valley Line article refers to the line between Bishop Auckland and Saltburn, I took this as what the section of line is called when updating it. If it was called something previous in the past and the diagram should be referring to its past appearance (or if the TVL isn't in fact that long) maybe something else might be more appropriate than labelling it as the TVL. --Simmo676 16:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Tees Valley Line"

message: "Its early Directors included well known individuals such as ... Ian Allan..."
"In December 2006, the railway received the prestigious Ian Allan award for "best station restoration project of 2006" for its restoration of Stanhope Station."
Hmm. — sjorford++ 22:08, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest? 

message: One small point concerning recent edits. I believe that the dispute over site access with Weardale Castings had started before the C37 group came to the line. The C37 locos came to the site by use of an improvised exchange siding at Wolsingham station and not through the Weardale Castings site. So, I don't think it is fair to attribute the increasing restrictions on access as being wholly due to Weardale Castings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.64.199.97 (talk) 08:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Class 37 Group

message: I have made various changes today. These principally reflect the changes for the 2013 season i.e. the effective end of the "regular" passenger services. Also to acknowledge that between 1983 and 1992 BR with Durham County Council operated excursions and then scheduled weekend services to StanhopeRobertforsythe (talk) 10:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1988-1993 
Talk:GameArena

message: semi-protect. Fairly High level of IP vandalism. Nightwolf 13:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{la|GameArena}}

message: Is this section needed? Nightwolf 05:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Members

message: this needs to be removed since wikipedia is not a Soapbox Timpent 05:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur... Nightwolf 13:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Forums

message: This section should be re-written;
'GameArena is currently going through a new shift with the merging of GameNow and Gameshop which will see a whole new interface style. The new name given will be Bigpond GameArena. These changes will offer many benifits for GameArena users as stated "The best in game news", "Australia's largest and most vibrant games community" and "Terrific competitions, prizes and online ladder competitions". Changes are expected in the coming weeks.' Nightwolf 05:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The majority of this article will be nominated for deletion at the rate this is going. Non-notability probably...Short stop 06:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Aye, Indeed - Nightwolf 06:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a member of gamearena and a frequent user.. i dont really think it deserves an article. I may be a medium-large australia game community.. and i know nothing on wiki "deserves" an article but i know some people from GA(gamearena) mess around with the article for fun. I concur with the above and think it should be deleted. Kingpomba 14:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much to my chagrin the end result of the deletion discussion was 'Keep'. Nightwolf 06:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: Could an admin please protect the page from edit's, It keeps getting vandalised - I just removed the latest vandalism. Nightwolf 02:44, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:Powder-actuated tool

message: I just need a few guidlines on the merging process as it does seem fairly complicated and it does mention "experienced editor" any help?--billbeee 05:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved the reference to "Ramset guns" to the first paragraph as its apparently not specific to Australia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.3.72 (talk) 18:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I removed the line about these tools being considered firearms in Australia.  If someone can provide a link to a source that specifically identifies powder actuated nail guns as falling into one of Australia's regulated classes of fire arms, please do so and restore this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.228.69.114 (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weapons in Australia? 

message: * Amazed not to see an "In popular culture" section with this  would anyone object? ciphergoth (talk) 19:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't. This is nothing but trivia. See WP:IPCEXAMPLES. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:London's New Year's Day Parade

message: I'm sure someone would correct me if necessary, but as I understand it this is an article about London. However, the majority of the texts refers to American High School Bands. I suggest either those parts toned down or moved to a separate article. Bee (talk) 14:23, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The event happens in London, but almost half the participants are from the USA (something like 4000 out of 8500 in 2013 AFAICR from the commentary) --Rjmunro (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  American bands 

message: The article's first paragraph says:  "The first year the parade took place was 1987" which I believe to be correct. The "Organisation" section says "The parade dates back to the 1920s to celebrate the special relationship between Britain and the USA." I don't know where this comes from - it seems contradictory. --Rjmunro (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1920s? 

message: How is the parade financed? Who pays for the travelling costs and other expenses of the American high school marching bands? Headhitter (talk) 12:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costs 

message: I've had an email request come through OTRS to rename this article to "London's New Year's Day Parade". Does anyone have any objections? I've invited the requestee to comment here. Samuel Tarling (talk) 20:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Samuel Tarling (talk) 06:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to rename to "London's New Year's Day Parade"
Talk:Arthur Quintal

message: ... has this page been redirected to William McCoy?!, Surely it should be redirected to Matthew Quintal if anyone. If there was a problem with the page please tell me and I will reference it etc... But I would prefer it not to be the way it is!
Thanks,
Chris.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisjackson (talk • contribs) 11:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why...