lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Video vixen

message: — Assignment last updated by Simplygrey (talk) 18:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Black Women and Popular Culture

message: It's verging on unreadable, and really needs a rewrite from top to bottom. 2407:7000:9BF1:4000:16E:FC20:5427:9D00 (talk) 12:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that the quality varies throughout the article. Either way, these issues may be because it's been edited and reedited by students (see basically everything else on this talk page) whose grasp of a lot of things, including practices of good writing, may well be tenuous. --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 18:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is written terribly.  

message: — Assignment last updated by Bezzza (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Black Women and Popular Culture

message: — Assignment last updated by KING162 (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Hip Hop 50
Talk:Jungbu Expressway

message: oppose I'm really oppose to split it. You can't do this. most of the interstating roadways that two names have sharing same numbers, it should be one.
and to the north, after Ginseng Land SA in Geumsan, Chungnam Province, the next SA is Sintanjin SA, the Korea roadway Corp. says. Sometimes you need to follow number, sometimes Korea roadway corp., and sometimes what president says.-User:HongDae
It's Insam Land SA, not Ginseng Land SA.-鎭海벚꽃祝祭 (talk) 10:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Siam Paragon

message: The article states Siam Paragon is a department store. I would say it's a shopping mall. As such, is it still the biggest in Asia? −Woodstone 15:07, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a shopping mall with the "Siam Paragon" department store inside (same name is used). I am not sure which one is the biggest, the complete shopping mall or just the department store. -- Lerdsuwa 04:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shopping mall or department store

message: Sadly, many of the cited species are no longer there. So I wrapped them inside a comment. It should be updated with the latest status. -- Lerdsuwa 16:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Siam Ocean World

message: While it does have some parking capacity, it is unfortunately unable to hold ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND cars. However I don't have the correct number so cannot edit. 122.155.168.27 (talk) 08:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parking space
Talk:Mandi Bahauddin

message: Can you revert an edit made right now? 66.87.68.208 (talk) 06:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unclear which edit you refer to. This appears to be the latest — Andy W. (talk) 20:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2017 

message: This particular area was uninhabited until Chaudhry Bahaduin a Gondal of the Jat tribe established a trading post.  He brought with himself a 'Khatri' of the trding caste and established a Mandi 'trading post' here which became popular and eventually established into the present town.  This information was recorded in the census report carried out by the Pakistani government in the 1990's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.142.147 (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Chaudhry Bahadin Gondal
Talk:Borsetshire

message: I had been told that Borsetshire was an East Midlands county. I therefore presumed that it nestled between Leicestershire, Northamptonshire & Warwickshire. Anyone have other ideas? --die Baumfabrik 15:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Midlands? 
Talk:Sa'ar 4.5-class missile boat

message: I have following text deleted, because its bullshit, it refers to Saar 5 and not to Saar 4.5: "The Saar 4.5 is the smallest craft to incorporate a helicopter hangar. The ship can carry two Dolphin helicopters, one on the landing pad and the other inside the hangar."
The claim is indeed correct. There are actually two different Saar 4.5 classes. One class is usually called Aliya class and only consists of two ships, Aliya and Geoula. Both ships were sold to the Mexican Navy in 2004. This class has a helicopter hangar and can operate the Dauphin helicopter. The other class (Hetz class) is a missile boat without a hangar. Earthgoogler 22:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any proof to the claim that a Saar 4.5 boat was hit and destroyed?
-- Adeptitus 17:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combat history 

message: The boat length is 58m and 4m longer than the Saar 4 which is also 4m. One of the two figures is wrong. 82.166.180.110 03:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boat Length 

message: Really, got any sources for this highly dubious statement of OR. If so, cite them when you replace the delete garbade text. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most potent combat vessel in the world?
Talk:Giovanni Girolamo Saccheri

message: This Talk content has been copied from the "Giovanni Gerolamo Saccheri" article, which now redirects here.
See comment below about "Girolamo" spelling.
----
Google gives an approximate 50% edge to "Girolamo" over "Gerolamo", but both versions seems to have equally authoritative websites vouching for them, so we should look for a ultra-authoritative print source to settle the issue. Stan 19:05, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone has said that Saccheri found no logical contradiction with the notion that the angle sum of triangles can be greater then 180. This cannot be correct, because it contradicts Euclid's second postulate. Also, it is a non sequitur that if Saccheri found that the angle sum of a triangle is greater than 180, he established the foundations of hyperbolic geometry, where the angle sums are less than 180 and nothing else in Euclid besides the fifth postulate is contradicted. I could be completely wrong here, but a source would be appreciated. SJCstudent Dec 24, 2005
:You are right! I have a reference somewhere, but I don't know where I chucked it... Professor M. Fiendish, Esq. 05:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source on > 180
Talk:Grace Llewellyn

message: Her work is widely regarded as what? I don't think it's technically correct to just say "her work is widely regarded." Perhaps we could say it's held in high regard, or that it's widely regarded as an important contribution to the field. Amillion (talk) 05:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, 11 years later I had the same reaction to the vague use of "widely regarded". I've removed that bit.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:56, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  widely regarded
Talk:Matthew Bright

message: I just figured this shouldnt go on the main page, so i moved it here.
_________________________
Just so you all know Rick Elfman and my father Matthew Bright are not friends. My dad is currently living just out of Santa Monica and is working on a commedy about the Manson murders.  Another project in the works is a twisted version of the Little Rascals set in southern Mexico with native indian children and a jackalope.                                      -Max Bright
*Whether these allegations are true or not have no place on the Wikipedia talkback section. --Frenkmelk talk 02:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Cape Spartivento

message: I have recently edited the first line concerning the Battle of Taranto. It said: "Half of the Italian fleet destroyed" If you take a look at the outcome of the battle one battleship was sunk and two more were damaged, together with a light cruiser. Three other battleships remained operational and all of the heavy cruisers too. It seems too strong to state that half of the fleet was destroyed. --Niels Weymeis 09:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of the six BBs in the fleet, one was sunk and two were damaged and had to withdraw from battle (for a time). That's half, at least according to standards of the day. Maury 13:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half of the Italian fleet destroyed? 

message: Collar was a two-convoys operation, one bounded for Malta, the other to Alexandria. The Italian fleet engaged only the escort of one of these, and the battle which follows up is a consequence of the operation, not the operation itself. Also, the battle was the first Italian attempt to thwart a British convoy after Taranto, so both issues deserve a separate article. DagosNavy 12:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Strongly opposed to merge

message: Can really be called a battle, a minor naval artillery skirmish of 54 minutes ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.9.31.198 (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is that a battle ? 

message: On this day today stated that the battle took place off the coast of Sicily. Should this not be Sardinia? Petergans (talk) 13:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  location 

message: The order of battle mentions Ark Royal not entering the battle. According to https://www.wlb-stuttgart.de/seekrieg/40-11.htm , a very reliable Chronicle from the state of Wuerttemberg says her aircraft attacked. That's a clear involvement of an aircraft carrier. --JuergenKlueser (talk) 12:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not entering battle?
Talk:Youth voice

message: I can't be the only one who finds this:
 Other sources cite
to be ironically humourous. CameoAppearance 08:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't you? Please back this unsourced assertion with a reliable source. -moritheilTalk 05:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentary

message: This sounds like a made-up word. The first ten Google hits don't use the term in the sense used in this article. It's mostly organizations called Youth Voice whatever. I'm not disputing the concept, just the term. Also article needs serious work. Herostratus 06:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does need serious work, because there is a significant body of academic research, social practice, and theoretical development that specifically addresses youth voice that does need cited. Your simple scan is evidence of the social practice. Continue watching for the rest to be added. Freechild 02:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can certainly back up the existence and importance of "Youth Voice".  It is a real concept that gets discussed a lot in certain circles.  KPalicz 13:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge tag removed as per notice on talk page. - Freechild 20:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto KPalicz. It needs to stay up. Lopezjaylo98 (talk) 00:15, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  youth voice 
Talk:Battle of Cape Esperance

message: I added, "It would also check additional Japanese advances" as 1 of the objectives & "In addition, they expended destroyers IJN desperately needed for commerce defense." as 1 of the effects of the Tokyo Express. Also, re Henderson Field: who was it named for? I know he was KIA at Midway, but I don't recall his name. Can somebody footnote it in the article?  Trekphiler 10:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added information about Lofton R. Henderson to the footnote. Cla68 20:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Point conceded. Cla68 (talk) 22:46, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Web addition

message: Currently the table shows IJN lost 1 destroyer. However, the text clearly states that both Natsugumo and Murakumo was sunk during the battle. It should be corrected. --Happyseeu (talk) 04:14, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: IJN lost 3 destroyers total (Fubuki by gunfire, Murakumo and Natsugumo by air)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.181.81.144 (talk) 05:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese lost two destroyers, not one
Talk:Denis McLoughlin

message: This is an excellent article. BB Annual 5 was also written by Arthur Groom -- I have a copy and he is credited on the colour title page / frontispiece. Have updated the biblio entry with this info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.78.253.232 (talk) 20:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buffalo Bill 5
Talk:Battle of Cape Matapan

message: The Italian losses were: 1 damaged battleship, 3 heavy cruisers, 2 destroyers. The Italians didn`t know the radar and this fact played an important role. During the night the Italian ships were simply "blind".
The times in this article are in 24 hour format, but this is not clear, as the syntax is not HHMM, but HH:MM.  As the first many times are in the AM, an ambiguity is created.  24.61.45.124 04:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It took 4 months to bring her back to operations. That's significant damage. GraemeLeggett (talk) 13:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but some refits took that long and she was never disabled or out of the fight; can we change it to 'damaged' or 'moderately damaged' or something? Gehyra Australis (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian losses. 

message: I've removed the name "Battle of Tenaro", as I've never seen it called that; the Italian name is "Gaudo", and the link redirects to "Cape Matapan". 
Can anyone shed light on this? Xyl 54 (talk) 13:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?

message: How is this the last fleet action of the royal navy?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.200.224.138 (talk) 14:25, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: LAst fleet action

message: "In 1966, H. Montgomery Hyde published a story alleging that a spy (codename Cynthia) seduced Admiral Alberto Lais (the Italian naval attaché in Washington, D.C.) and that she obtained a codebook used by the British to defeat the Italians at Matapan. Hyde was found guilty of libelling the dead but evidence of GC&CS involvement was not made public at that time."
Curious - under English Common law one cannot commit libel or slander against a dead person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.11.216 (talk) 11:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: H. Montgomery Hyde

message: The italian destroyer damaged was the Oriani
The info on the photo of the Veneto firing off Gavdos declares that was taken the day BEFORE the action.
 Suppongoche (talk) 15:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oriani, not Gioberti
Talk:David Guterson

message: A chance to ask questions and improve this article! On Tuesday 14th October 2008, David Guterson will be talking about 'Snow Falling on Cedars' on the BBC radio programme World Book Club. You can be part of the live audience at BBC Bush House at 15.30 hours or ask questions by email (by 7th October). If you would like to put a question to David Guterson about 'Snow Falling on Cedars', be part of the audience, or have any other questions, email worldbookclub@bbc.co.uk. The programme will be permanently archived and available for download on the BBC website. EdQuine (talk) 11:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ask David Guterson about this book
Template talk:History of Croatia

message: Yeah, it'd be nice to have Origin of Croats and Migration of Croats in History of Croatia series, but the articles do not exist at the moment, so there's no sence in putting the red links to the Template. When the articles get written, then put them in the template. --Dijxtra 15:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I removed [[Origin of Croats]] and [[Migration of Croats]] from the template 

message: 09-Dec-2008: To allow the infobox "Template:History_of_Croatia" to be stacked on to the related infobox "Template:History_of_Hungary", then traits of the infobox must be changed by passing parameters. New parameters are:
:* boxclass=infobox - the CSS class of table (default: infobox)
:* boxwidth=220px - the width of the box table (default: 205px)
:* marginleft=0.1em - the width of the margin outside the left edge of the box (default: 1.0em).
Other parameters might be needed for further use of the infobox in more articles. The above parameters are used when stacking along with other infoboxes. -Wikid77 (talk) 00:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New parameters boxclass, boxwidth, marginleft

message: For what purpose is this example? The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was not within any Yugoslavia. -- Imbris (talk) 22:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to repeat you're not about to agree to anything I do - I got the message... Please don't edit any of my talkpage posts. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 22:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You should realize that POV-pushing Croatia within Yugoslavia will not work. Did you read the latest at Talk:Socialist Republic of Croatia. -- Imbris (talk) 22:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You have started edit-waring knowing that your Yugoslav Front cannot be part of this template. Did you read what User:GregorB wrote here? -- Imbris (talk) 02:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example 

message: I added 'existence of Ottoman Empire in Croatia (1492-1791)' section in this pace. But, it was deleted unfairly. Existence of Republic of Venice in Croatia was limited in western Istria and Dalmatia. Before taking remnant of Hungarian Croatia in 1527, one of Habsburg Monarcy in was limited in eastern Istria. But, they had sections in this page. Existence of Ottoman Empire in Croatia was lasted three hundred years and sometime most of it was part of her. But, she hadn't any section in this page. Why ? As if there was an Anti-Turk sentiment on it. Please, you finish this sentiment and add an Ottoman Empire section in this page, please. Yours sincerely Cemsentin1 (talk) 18:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Why isn't any section about Ottoman Empire in History of Croatia page despite existence of her was lasted 3 hundred years ?
Talk:Saccheri quadrilateral

message: :Added title. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 21:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  (redirect) 

message: This article claims that in the case of obtuse angle, the quadrilateral leads to elliptical geometry, but both Morris Kline (Mathematical Thought From Ancient to Modern Times, chapter XXXVI) and H.S.M. Coxeter (Non-Euclidean Geometry, 1999, page 5, ) state (without proof) that this case leads to accept the fifth postulate. Which is correct?--Nickanc (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see why you are confused. The article is not being precise enough to clarify this. The assumption of the obtuse angle, in the presence of the first four Euclidean postulates, leads to a contradiction. Both Saccheri and Omar Khayyam were able to show this, so they talk about rejecting the assumption of the obtuse angle. When properly phrased this contradiction can be turned into a proof of the parallel postulate. This is what Kline and Coxeter are talking about. On the other hand, in elliptic geometry (in which you need to toss out both Euclid's second and fifth postulates) it can be shown that the summit angles of a Saccheri quadrilateral are obtuse. This is what the article is saying without mentioning the additional modifications needed to make the statement true. So, the answer to your question is, they both are ... but under different sets of assumptions. Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 06:43, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  in case of obtuse angle 

message: According to Cooke's history of math text, Jeremy Gray calls this a Thabit quadrilateral and that it thus predates Khayyam by a few centuries.  If so, perhaps some Wikipedia guru could fix that; I am not familiar enough with the editing protocol and syntax to do so myself without spending more time than I can devote to it.  But it would be good to have the right people attributed to this concept.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.227.112.182 (talk) 13:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ibn Qurra
Talk:Mahinda (Buddhist monk)

message: His full name was Arhat Mahinda , and this should be moved there. --Bhadani 15:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Arahath Mahinda thero 2402:4000:13C4:F81F:1:0:FA62:430A (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arahath Mahinda thero 

message: There is an art of  statues unique to Sri Lanka. but i see the Mihidu statue  used here is in  elegant feminine shape  as the main image.it distorts the overall impression of the page. It could lead to loose the first impression of the page . It can influence people's cultures and religions. Therefore, I would like to advise  to carefully select images , and to think carefully about the impact their decisions may have on these priceless works of art, cultural and religious significance. RsEkanayake 06:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The main image used.
Talk:Ditlev Blunck

message: The following Danish language text was removed from the article so it can be translated: 
: indtil han med genremaleriet blev repræsentant for den hverdagsrealisme, der for alvor fik sit gennembrud i dansk kunst i midten af 1820'erne. Dette ses bl.a. i værkerne Interiør med ung officer fra ca.1825-28 og En bataljemaler fra ca. 1826. Med malerier af kunstneren i sit atelier inspirerede Blunck blandt andre Bendz til lignende skildringer.
Påvirkningen fra J.L. Lund blev især tydelig under det Tysklandsophold, som Blunck påbegyndte i 1828. I Berlin, München og Dresden stiftede han bekendtskab med J.L. Lunds kunstnervenner, heriblandt den store tyske romantiske maler, Casper David Friedrich (1774-1840). Det var dog især bekendtskabet med den tyske maler, nazareneren Johann Friedrich Overbecks (1789-1869) værker, der resulterede i Bluncks kunstneriske stilskifte. Han helligede sig herefter i højere grad det religiøse motiv og udviklede som en af de eneste danskere et maleri stærkt influeret af nazareneres let stive stilistiske udformning, religiøse idealisme og allegoriske indhold. Set samlet udfolder Bluncks samlede produktion af værker sig således stilistisk mellem en eckersbergsk saglig realisme og en mere idealiseret tysk-inspireret stil, tydeligt hentet fra J.L. Lunds internationalt orienterede udtryk.
Bluncks udenlandsophold førte ham også til Rom i en længere periode mellem 1828-1838. Her sluttede han sig til kredsen omkring Bertel Thorvaldsen (1770-1844) og udførte også flere af sine hovedværker, heriblandt Danske kunstnere i Osteriet La Gensola i Rom fra 1837 og De fire menneskealdre: Barndommen, Ungdommen, Manddommen og Alderdommen fra perioden 1840-1845, som blev bestilt af den danske konge, Christian VIII. Bluncks ophold i Danmark efter ankomsten i 1838 blev ganske kort. I 1841 afbrød han sin forbindelse til Danmark, da han fik en dom for seksuel overtrædelse grundet sin homoseksualitet. Han forlod landet og tilbragte resten af sit liv i udlandet indtil sin død i Hamburg i 1854.
Rmhermen 15:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Murder of Jessica Keen

message: Please do not remove the cleanup and copyedit tags.  There are misspellings here, run-on sentences, spacing problems.  That plus tone seems to be trying to convince the reader that this was a heinous crime—an unnecessary effort for most of us.Bjones 15:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On April 9 2008, police in Burlington, North Carolina arrested Marvin Lee Smith, Jr. Smith has been charged with unlawful sexual conduct on Keen, a felony. Smith has an extradition hearing set for April 30, 2008, which will determine whether he will be turned over to Ohio authorities to face charges.
So whatever became of this? --Ragemanchoo (talk) 08:06, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates???

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 16:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Jessica Keen →  – The reasons for this page move are quite obvious. 2603:7000:2601:B81:4C93:75E7:B8C2:52D4 (talk) 17:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 December 2022