Talk:Marvin Bush

message: "Marvin Bush and Securacom/Stratesec were in charge of security at the World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines during a two year contract which was set to end on September 10th, 2001, only a day before the 9/11 attacks."
Marvin Bush was reported as a director of the company Securacom/Stratesec until June 2000; claiming he was in charge of the security at the World Trade Center is an exaggeration, like saying that Robert Rubin builds automobiles (he's on the board of Ford Motor Company).
The citation for the claim that the contract was due to expire on September 10, 2001 is "Barbara Bush's Memoirs".  This contradicts the citation in [9/11 Conspiracy Theories ] which says:
"This last statement has been used by some conspiracy theorists to say that the contract "expired" on September 11, 2001. Barbara Bush confirmed this theory in her book 'Reflections' also stating 9/11 was the day the contract expired."
So which is it?  Barbara Bush's A Memoir or Barbara Bush's Reflections?  My best guess is neither.  A Memoir was published in 1994, well before the events of 9-11.  Reflections was published in 2003, and contains a short chapter on September 2001 (the book mostly covers 1993-2000).  There is no discussion in that chapter of Marvin's board work; the mention of him being in the subway under Wall Street on 9-11 is confirmed.  A search of the book on Amazon for "contract" returned zero mentions, as did "expired", "Stratesec" and "Securacom".
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.72.38 (talk • contribs) 
:I agree completely, this article is full of rubbish.  It is ok to put uncited material into an article when it is not suspect, but this is clearly dubious at best.  Read this blog article for more information.  Nathan J. Yoder 11:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Barbara Bush's Memoirs"? 

message: Well if this article is full of rubbish, and if no one has the ability, time, or inclination to at least remove what is plausibly non-factual, then perhaps we should just delete the article entirely. Hi There 15:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also vote against deletion.  The article contains plenty of facts about a notable person.  For those facts you care to dispute, please do your duty as an editor and improve the article.  204.42.27.8 00:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  For years now this page has been a dumping ground for crazy ideas.  Any useful information in this article should be merged with a relevant article.Mantion (talk) 12:12, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. I've been watching the article for years. Poorly sourced information doesn't stick, and he is a notable person. -Jordgette [talk] 18:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Article for Deletion?

message: Interesting circumstances surround the accidental death of Marvin Bush's babysitter, Champagne, September 29, 2003 "found crushed to death by her own vehicle in a driveway in front of the Bush family home in the Alexandria section of Fairfax County. [She] reportedly lived at the Bush family home. "  Source: http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/10-16-03/discussion.cgi.16.html.  Although I tend to agree the younger Bush's various business connections to security firms involved in 9/11 is more interesting.  It is odd the way accidental death surrounds the Bush family.  Although there have been far more non-accidental deaths as a direct result. Would any editor or contributor care to write up the information about the Marvin Bush family babysitters unusual death at the Bush family residence and add it to the article? 204.42.27.8 00:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead babysitter 

message: Why has there been no mention of and no link to Marvin Bush on his fathers pages for all this time? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.172.204.59 (talk) 14:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of Marvin Bush in fathers G.H.W.Bush article 

message: This section claims that Marvin Bush is of interest to 9/11 conspiracy theorists because of his 'links' to the World Trade Center. This is the kind of statement that really needs to be sourced; who exactly has said this? How notable are these claims? If no references can be provided about the 'Marvin Bush-World Trade Center connection' from reliable sources, then according to the WP:BLP policy the claim must be removed. Terraxos (talk) 17:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not in favor of giving this nonsense the time of day. -Jordgette [talk] 17:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Send that to the 9/11 Conspiracy theories articles, and add a disclaimer telling readers why it's total WP:CB. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  07:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Controversy' section