lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Calculator watch

message: this full of editorializing and speculation on fashion/pop-culture.Not a single technical detail,model list or any feature descriptions. 
This should be an article describing a electronic device.All these speculation belong in trivia.
MidNiteNeko 15:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unfortunately my redirect of this article to the appropriate section of watch was undone. Let's look at what this article consists of:
# The lead is largely useless.
# The only sentence of the history section which is sourced is the first sentence. The first reference doesn't actually back up what the article says and the second does no more than the existing references in watch.
# The rest of the second section is pure original research, mostly pop culture junk.
# The "future" section is cimpletely unreferenced.
There's nothing to save here. I'm going to re-merge unless there's any reasonable argument for why in its present form this article is productive. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 10:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: Casio made at least two models of calculator watch with capacitive sensor touch screens. One version used an on-screen keypad, the other used character recognition as the user drew numbers and operation symbols over the full screen with a fingertip. The digitizers were fragile, easily destroyed with a scratch, so finding one with a working digitizer is difficult. That makes them a sought after collectible. I bought one of the character recognition type at a thrift store for 50 cents and sold it for 50 dollars on eBay. Bizzybody (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touch screens 
Talk:Saxon Shore

message: It's not clear that the supplying of the army of Julian with grain from Britain in 359,[7] or the landings by Count Theodosius in 367-68 was directly related to the Saxon Shore forts, nor that if they were that would preclude the forts being designed principally for use against seaborne raiders.  There is also the suggestive title of the command.  Too many references here are to primary sources.  Deipnosophista (talk) 16:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I've tagged one section extensively about this. -HammerFilmFan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.25.27 (talk) 17:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose

message: For this section:
"The only contemporary reference we possess that mentions the name 'Saxon Shore' comes in the late 4th century Notitia Dignitatum, which lists its commander, the Comes Litoris Saxonici per Britanniam ("Count of the Saxon Shore in Britain"), and gives the names of the sites under his command and their respective complements of military personnel."
I was just reading The Saxons in England pages 13-14 (first new paragraph) and it seems to fit, so would it be a good secondary source? It's from 1849 so it's not the most modern one out there. I'm New to Wikipedia editing so I don't know and didn't want to presume edit anything.  Penbaggins (talk) 19:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source from 1849?
Talk:Chhoti Sadri

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Charles-Simon Catel

message: My sources — including an old Grove's as well as the French version of this article — indicate that Catel was born in June, not July.
See https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_Music_and_Musicians/Catel,_Charles
and https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles-Simon_Catel
If this is wrong, and more recent scholarship indicates otherwise, I certainly welcome any properly documented correction.
LewisChessman (talk) 04:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catel's birth date
Talk:Put 'Em Under Pressure

message: The posting of copyrighted song lyrics (beyond one or two lines) is prohibited by Wikipedia's copyright rules (see WP:LYRICS). The lyrics of Put 'em Under Pressure (1990) and Ally's Tartan Army (1978) are both still well within copyright (even if the source melody is public domain). 68.146.41.232 16:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics deleted

message: Do you notice in the first section it says that the song was based on an old irish folk song, but the cecond section says otherwise? Thanks! Itsupforgrabsnow (talk) 18:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusing words
Talk:Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

message: Moved here from [Gloucester Royal Hospital]. Jjasi 16:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Nickajack Cave

message: The book "Caves of Chattanooga", which was published by the National Speleolgocial Society in April, 2007, has a chapter on Nickajack Cave.  Chapter 5, Nickajack Cave, begins on page 85 and continues through page 110 and contains numerous drawings, maps, and photographs of the cave.
Larry E. Matthews (talk) 21:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  For Further Information On Nickajack Cave 

message: I'm not sure how "spitual" his experience was.  From all available accounts, he was high on alcohol and drugs and went to Nickajack Cave to commit suicide.  His plan was to enter the cave and go as far as he could until his light gave out, then lay down and die.
Odds are, he didn't make it far, then laid down and passed out.  When he woke up, probably a LOT more sober, especially considering the temperature in the cave is only 57 degrees, he decided he didn't really want to die that day after all, and followed a breeze, hoping it would lead him to the entrance.  Soon, he saw light in the distance and followed it out, where he found his wife and mother waiting for him.
Good for him, though, if this prompted him to quit alcohol and drugs.
74.240.220.77 (talk) 17:23, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Johnny Cash "Spirtual" Experience
Talk:New Left Review

message: What's the number of its subscription, readership or circulation? Hermant patel 16:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Circulation

message: If you're going to mention something like that, there's a need to explain what caused it and to give some idea of how deep it went.
Just saying "there was a rift" really doesn't give us the information we need. Ken Burch 09:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What was the nature of the 1993 rift?

message: I would like more information concerning the history of this publication---this wiki article is currently in serious need of more content. For instance, there should be a list of all past and current editors, as well as a list of long-time contributors (e.g. Tariq Ali).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.91.136 (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More history/information needed 

message: The 2003 ranking in the lead paragraph is much better than the 2015 ranking near the bottom of the article.  The order of this information should be reversed.  The latest available ranking in the lead paragraph and its earlier better ranking somewhere in the main body.  Surely?  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 14:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I went bold and removed the 2003 bit from the lede and contrasted the two rankings in the later section. Welcome to be adjusted further if you see fit. JesseRafe (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking
Talk:New England Skeptical Society

message: The article needs independent sources.  So far the references are all to the organization itself, which is sufficient for factual type self claims such as its mission and founding, but more references are needed to better illustrate the organization's notability.Professor marginalia 16:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There's the one New York Times article (assuming it mentions it, I didn't actually read it), but Wikipedia articles typically require at least three reliable sources independent of the group. An appearance on the Bullshit TV show might count. More sourcing all around would be helpful, because it mostly just sounds like it could have been a press release written by themselves. DreamGuy (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I've put a couple refs in there as well as expanding it a bit. Donhoraldo (talk) 10:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Independent sources?

message: Since it's obvious Steve satisfies WP:PROF, I've created an article on him. (Steven Novella). Please have a look & help out if you can. Mikker (...) 01:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! I was going to eventually start it myself if no one did. Voice-of-All 01:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steven Novella's wiki article 

message: I don't know how much I'm going to change on this article, but I'm going to attempt some changes. As the talk page looks dormant I'm just going to rewrite this in my user space and hope all are okay with the changes I make. We can always change things around once you see what I've done with it. Give me a couple weeks.Sgerbic (talk) 05:04, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no one commented, it took me far longer than a couple weeks. Actually I've been done for a long time, but was holding out trying to find photos. I've been promised logo and more photos, but you can only ask so many times before you finally just give up and publish. Someone can add them later if they are uploaded.Sgerbic (talk) 04:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is getting a rewrite 

message: The section of the article titled "Other" reads like an advertisement for membership.  I propose it be removed. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 06:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: --Gronk Oz (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the "Other" section? 

message: The New England Skeptical Society describes itself as a non-profit organization on their website. However there appears to be only one 990 listed for the year 2001 at Propublica's Nonprofit Explorer here, and their mention on Guidestar holds a disclaimer stating that "This organization's exempt status was automatically revoked by the IRS for failure to file a Form 990, 990-EZ, 990-N, or 990-PF for 3 consecutive years. Further investigation and due diligence are warranted."
Has the organization changed names but retained their non-profit status? or has the organization shifted to a different status using either the same name or another variation? This article needs to be updated with more accurate information. Cedar777 (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-profit status
Talk:Jehoash Inscription

message: Is there any indication what the actual text of the inscription is supposed to be? John Carter 16:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Text

message: I tagged this because the intro needs some work.Sweetmoose6 (talk) 02:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: Translations are normally copyrighted, so I've removed this one, see discussion on this at . Please don't replace it without explicit evidence it is copyright free. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations 

message: This article is written with the slant that the inscription is, or at the least, could very well be genuine. (This is in contrast to the opposite non-NPOV, that the stone is, or at the least could very well be, a forgery.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.203.30.43 (talk) 20:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 11:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking back at earlier versions it appears that some of the text and references supporting forgery have been removed in this edit. I've replaced some of it. Wayne (talk) 14:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non NPOV 
Talk:Kerkouane

message: Under Excavations, a deity called Sid is mentioned, but it links to a disambiguation page. I can't find anything about this Sid. Does anyone know who/what it refers to? Lennart97 (talk) 13:34, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Grazie! The identification of this deity with Sardus Pater agrees with Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Phoenicia#A god called Sid where I brought the issue up, because of that the mention of Sid in this article now links to Sardus Pater. Lennart97 (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you! I have found some other informations about Sid and I have added them to the Italian page. Now I am going to add these informations in the English Wikipedia.--BandiniRaffaele2 (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Hi, sorry for the late reply, apparently someone moved the article to draftspace, it's now at Draft:Sid (deity). What do you need help with specifically? Using  should work if you want to add the sources that you used on the Italian article. Lennart97 (talk) 15:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sid 

message: I cant seen to verify the importance of this site in the Punic world. It was relatively small, approximately 1,200 population, and was not a major trading port, nor producer. It was involved in the production of garum and purple dye, but not a major one due to its size, and
 it's complete absence from surviving historical sources doesn't lead me to believe it was particularly important. 2001:569:719F:A900:60BE:203:1FE4:B6FA (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of Kerkouane
Talk:Treebog

message: A tree bog how-to on wikipedia?
:Good point. I've removed the most egregious material.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 20:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

message: This page is like an ad. --78.54.65.110 (talk) 23:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad

message: This seems to be basically the same as an arborloo. As the term Arborloo is more widely used in the sanitation literature, I propose to merge the two articles and then to redirect from Tree Bog to arborloo. What do you think, User:JMWt? EvMsmile (talk) 11:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I still think this should be merged with arborloo! EvMsmile (talk) 13:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with article on Arborloo?

message: Wouldn't a hard rain or flood spread the poop all over the place? What about animals feeding on the poo?  Leo Breman (talk) 20:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rain
Talk:George Bures Miller

message: It may not look like much yet but I'll get there. Freshacconci | Talk 16:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just starting this 

message: * Newly assessed as stub-class (A very basic description) for WP:WikiProject_Biography, WP:WikiProject_Visual_arts and WP:WikiProject_Canada. To improve, please add some significant contents, especially to the Solo works section. A see this as stub, rather than start, based on the contents that is unique to this article - since there is over lap with Janet Cardiff's. (Alternatively, consider whether a merge with Jant Cardiff would be more productive). Enki H. (talk) 02:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Nellie Farren

message: The main bone of contention appears to be the reference to her year of birth as 1848 and age of 56 at time of death. As per her  New York Times obituary, it states that she was born around "sixty years" previously, but clearly could not provide a date or year of birth or even a specific age. I don't think there is any site that can confirm she was born in 1848, but since she was in her late 50s or early 60s, I thought 1840s births was more accurate. It is not a big deal, anyway. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 05:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The NYT is not very reliable regarding obits of british actors - perhaps they felt they had to rush something into the next day's paper. This site and others that I have seen claim 1848.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. Good to know. Thanks. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 06:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth
Talk:List of National Historic Landmarks in Georgia

message: A non-logged in editor added King and Prince Hotel to this list of NHLs in Georgia.  It is NRHP-listed but is not a NHL, I believe based on searching at the National Park Service's web system for NHLs (at http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/default.cfm ).  So I removed it from the list just now.  But I started a stub article for the place. doncram (talk) 06:06, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  King and Prince Hotel 
Talk:Mike Girty

message: The article currently asserts that Mike Girty is the son of Simon Girty.
I requested citation.
Since Simon Girty died in 1818, and the article says Mike Girty was born in 1821, this strikes me as unlikely.
Girty was blind when he died, and infirm.  He spent the last years of his life in Canada, even if there were a few years of error in Mike Girty's date of birth it strikes me as extremely unlikely that a blind and infirm Girty would risk his life to cross into the USA.  And it strikes me as unlikely that if blind and infirm Simon Girty made his way to Ohio that he would find a someone who wanted to sleep with him.  Geo Swan (talk) 03:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the article doesn't say Mike Girty was born in 1821, it doesn't state his date of birth, instead it says: "Mike Girty, (fl. 1821–32)", note the link. Unfortunately I couldn't find his date of birth. I will look for citations though, they're probably in the sources at the bottom so if that's the case I will add them, if not, I will try to find them. --IvoShandor (talk) 23:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah, I'm taking a break right now though, I just checked my watchlist out of curiosity today, I will get to it when I get back though. --IvoShandor (talk) 23:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation 

message: Moved to Talk:Indian Creek massacre. —Kevin Myers 07:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction?
Talk:The One with the Prom Video

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Aside from a few (very minor) syntax and typos that I corrected myself, the article was well written and an easy read.  If you do any more expansion (and you should before WP:FAC, I would suggest getting an experienced copyeditor over here, first.
:2. Factually accurate?: Cited to (13) good WP:RS sources, with proper WP:CIT formatting, nice job.
:3. Broad in coverage?: As the contents show, major subsections include Plot, Production, Reception, Legacy.  I would expand the plot a teensy bit before trying for FA, and if you can find any more sources for tidbits in Reception and Legacy, all the better too.  But as is it looks good.
:4. Neutral point of view?: Phrased in a neutrally worded manner.
:5. Article stability? Article appears stable going back several months.
:6. Images?: One image, with a good detailed fair use rationale given on the image page.  If you could find a promotional poster specifically for this episode or something like that, that would be nice in the infobox.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. 
— Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 21:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination
Talk:Amber Dhara

message: The text for the plot was yanked straight from http://www.setindia.com/shows/shows_inside.php?id=93.
Please do not include copyrighted material in wikipedia articles (there are some exceptions under the fair use policy, however this most certainly does not fit). Not only is the text in question copyrighted, it is non-encyclopedic in style and content and simply does not belong here. Please don't abuse Wikipedia. 
You are as welcome as anyone else to write content, but placing copyrighted material on the site is not helpful. Please take a few minutes to read other articles for TV shows you like to get a sense of how they were written and for what  and proper context. By the time I read the first two or three sentences I knew I was reading copyrighted material, not because it reads like the work of a professional writer (not a particularly good one in any case) but because it so clearly was not written for Wikipedia. The writing is way too over the top and forced to be taken as anything other than an advertisement for the show. I don't mean to insult you here, I'm assuming you didn't write it in the first place. I also assume you want the show to have an article that will get the attention and interest of wikipedia users. To do so you need to write in an appropriate, encyclopedic style. Note that the results need not be boring; there are countless articles here that are a joy to read, and are such because of the content rather than the use of a flamboyant and overly dramatic style.
Instead of an obvious ad for the show you might consider providing information on the origin of the show, the writers and actors, the topic, and MOST importantly, explain *why* it is notable. Just being on air is not in and of itself justification. However, with a show with this kind of topic you should have no problem finding interesting things to say. Find quotes (remember, no original research) discussing how it breaks new ground, or how it follows in territory opened by shows such as "Life Goes On" which broke ground by showed a character with a highly stigmatized and physically noticeable condition, Down's Syndrome (I don't now that such statements exist, I'm just pointing out the kind of thing you might look for). 
You will find a lot of helpful inforation under Guidelines, Help and Resources, which you can always get to by clicking the Community Portal link on the left-most column of Wikipedia pages. This includes how to get help from other editors and from admins, including live chat online. --Fitzhugh 05:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted plot text was re-added
Talk:Making Fiends (TV series)

message: How many episodes do you think will come out? Jibajabba 8 January 2007 19:09 (UTC)
two.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.140.61.49 (talk) 01:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Technicly 6 and at is it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.243.19.150 (talk) 02:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've made character pages for Charlotte and Vendetta. ραncακemisτακe (talk) 19:06, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character pages 

message: Will More Making fiends be airing or NoT!!!!!!!!!!!!!?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSpector (talk • contribs) 22:42, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  season 2 
Talk:Basco, Batanes

message: basco batanes us he  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.163.23 (talk) 05:17, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:TrES-3b

message: Why is the distance to the star so uncertain?  It could be as close as 700 l.y. or as far away as 1,900 l.y.? Was the star discovered so recently that they haven't had a chance to do a parallax measurement on it? That seems unlikely unless the star and its planet were only discovered after July of 2007... seven months ago. If the star was discovered longer ago, there has been the required six months to do a parallax measurement on it. GBC (talk) 00:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ==Uncertain distance?== 