Talk:Miyeegombyn Enkhbold

message: Please don't present accusations as facts that you can't prove (just because some mongolian language web site writes he's corrupt doesn't automatically make it a fact).
Also compare the discussion page about Talk:Tsakhiagiyn_Elbegdorj. The problems here are almost exactly the same. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum for political propaganda. --Latebird 00:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: I put all citations and only facts. Mr. Latebird from Mongolia if you don't like real facts being written in English, that is your personal problem. Political propaganda is the word former Soviet Union and MPRP introduced to Mongolia and MPRP uses a lot. I want people know only truth, and facts not brainwashing of MPRP leaders who describe themselves as real communist successors to Mongolian herders in Mongolia and claim that they got support from the world because of being communists, at the same time MPRP claim that they brought democracy to Mongolia to the world in English which is totally false. 
People are not stupid and English speaking people should have opportunity to get facts in English from Wikipedia Encyclopedia not the twisted information for brainwashing of MPRP leaders and their followers. So the article is based on facts with citations. Mongolian newspapers are newspapers as in any other countries and specially UB Post is Mongolia's major English newspaper, and it is not a tabloid. If a fact is written in several newspapers, not even one, you can't say they are simply false, then you should prove your own claim too. If they were false claims, why the whole world closes its newspapers because newspapers only write false claims.
Also about Tsakhiagiyn_Elbegdorj section Miyeegombo Enkhbold overthrew Elbegdorj's government so the same people involve in that event, so it comes out on both of their biography. 
I saw Latebird actually translated Miyeegombo Enkhbold article from your German page and I edited yours using real facts with citations. Unfortunately, facts are facts and you can't delete facts justifying by neutrality. The way the article was first written by you Latebird was not neutral actually. Neutrality is required only for writing style but not to twist facts or to hide negativity. 
--Lemonhead 15:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly makes you think that I'm from Mongolia? Do you really think that everybody who disagrees with you must be an MPRP member? Please try not to confuse your personal opinion with facts. You're making very strong accusations against a living person. This means that you need to chose your words very carefully, and you failed doing this. In some cases, you also get the facts wrong. Just one example: The Mongolian Parliament's decision violated Mongolian Constitution's Article 25, Paragraph 1-6 that the Parliament exceeded its power as instead of discussing and deciding the resignation of the Grand Coalition Government's ten MPRP Members who submitted their resignation letter to the Parliament, the parliament overthrew Elbegdorj's Government. Ignoring the confusing grammar of this sentence, I went and checked those paragraphs in the mongolian constitution. I found that the parliament is explicitly given the power to decide as it did. In other words, using the word "illegal" in this context is a blatant misrepresentation of the facts. Please also note that you must not remove the POV and citation style markers from the article as long as there is a dispute. Removing them is a sign of bad faith. --Latebird 23:34, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I usually write at night european time, because I work during the day. And no offense, but I don't think you're in a position to criticize other people's grammar and spelling. Back to the topic: International conventions are irrelevant in building a governement, that's an internal matter. The parliament followed the instructions of the constitutions to the letter. The only thing that was "violated" were the coalition agreements. A coalition agreement is a matter of political policy, and therefore not legally binding (the courts can't decide about political questions). This is very different to a business contract. Please also note that your dislike of the MPRPs actions does not justify your behaviour here at WP. If you remove the POV marker again, I'll have to ask an administrator to block you. --Latebird 22:19, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Article Is Based On Only Facts and Neutral and it should not be liked by MPRP members

message: I would like to see a reliable(!) reference for the purported "facts" about his education. Was this in one of the mongolian language links? And how do we know we can trust this source? --Latebird 13:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no point in adding potentially libelous statements again and again without providing reliable and verifiable sources to confirm them. Since you didn't provide such sources for several weeks despite my request, I have to assume there are none. Adding those defamatory statements again will most likely get you banned. Attacking other authors in the edit summary is unacceptable behaviour as well, and doesn't strenghthen your case at all. --Latebird 17:19, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This section has again been reverted to a defamatory version that is not supported by any sources. Since the author refuses to even answer the requests for documentation here, the unconfirmed text will have to be removed again. It is not enough to just say that other people's sources are all "lying", you need to prove what you claim to be "correct info" with credible sources of your own. --Latebird 09:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 

message: Dear Lemonhead,
You have done a great job on Wikipedia. Don't worry about Mr Latebird. His words sound similar to those of people paid by MPRP who write such things to defend and praise their leaders Enkhbayar and Enkhbold through media, including online forums.
I am writing from Mongolia and I know the situation here. I completely agree with you that MPRP is trying to brainwash people of my country. But, fortunately, Mongolians are not so stupid that they believe in their propaganda. In a recent poll conducted by Sant Maral, Democratic Party got more supports than MPRP.
With regards to the contents edited by Mr Latebird, the translations of the titles are very poor. They need to be reviewed. Mr Latebird probably uses a government source, namely http://www.infomongol.com/contents.php?cid=304. The website is run by the Government Press and Information Office.
Dear GenuineMongol,
Thank you very much for your inspiration and links and more info about Mongolia's political situation. I believe in the intelligence and braveness of Mongols who once were strong enough to prove its ability to the world. I strongly believe that when the corruption organized by MPRP leaders are cracked down, the country will have much better way for Mongols and Mongolia to prosper and succeed. I only wish the whole world knows the facts and only facts of what is going on over there using my knowledge of the Mongolian language and ability to read Mongol news on the internet. Thank you again. Lemonhead 17:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Mr Lemonhead