Talk:Independent Commission Against Corruption (New South Wales)

message: :Image:Icac.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Icac.png

message: Drovers Wife You have provided no justification for the deletion of a significant development in ICAC - one that renders many of its actions until now illegal. What bigger development could there be? Also when the body's official overseer officially condemns its actions in relation to this development you wish to hide that from the public record as well.
Again I note these are factual and you have yet to provide any explanation for your censorship of the entry for ICAC. I can only assume from your series of minor political biographies that this is somehow politically motivated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.3.137 (talk) 22:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The content of the first paragraph is fine, but it's worded like an opinion piece from the Daily Telegraph, not an encyclopedia article. "however in the wake of the Cunneen decision the High Court found that ICAC was more generally not doing what is should" is not backed up in the sources cited or any other. Lee Rhiannon having been in a communist party forty years ago is in no way relevant to her opinions on ICAC. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Independent Commission Against Corruption (New South Wales). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140120060358/http://www.governmentnews.com.au/2013/11/04/article/NSW-officially-names-Justice-Megan-Latham-as-new-ICAC/ADSRXXLCOJ to http://www.governmentnews.com.au/2013/11/04/article/NSW-officially-names-Justice-Megan-Latham-as-new-ICAC/ADSRXXLCOJ
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified