Talk:Pedro Eugenio Aramburu

message: -- POV sources?? I don't think Aramburu had any agreement with Illian and the coupe de etat to the Illia seams to prove it:::consagrated a branch of the UCR (Union Civica Radical), that competed with Aramburu): being --
: But the article doesn´t say nothing about that.  --Zzzzzzus 15:37, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV??? 

message: This is about tag cleanup.  As all of the tags are more than a year old, there is no current discussion relating to them, and there is a great deal of editing done since the tags were placed, or perhaps there is a consensus on the discussion page, they will be removed.  This is not a judgement of content.  If there is cause to re-tag, then that of course may be done, with the necessary posting of a discussion as to why, and what improvements could be made.  This is only an effort to clean out old tags, and permit them to be updated with current issues if warranted.Jjdon (talk) 21:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pedro Eugenio Aramburu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051030062932/http://lanic.utexas.edu/project/arl/pm/sample2/argentin/aramburu/index.html to http://lanic.utexas.edu/project/arl/pm/sample2/argentin/aramburu/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Pedro Eugenio Aramburu's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "pot":
From 1957 Argentine Constitutional Assembly election: Potash, Robert. The Army and Politics in Argentina. Stanford University Press, 1996.
From 1963 Argentine general election: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Pedro Eugenio Aramburu]] 

message: This is suched a biased article, it claims that:
- "Aramburu did not have the slightest trait reminiscent of an authoritarian military man. He had the manners of a true democrat.", which is based on a 2000 article from a conservative newspaper, written from the perspective of someone who obviously admires him.
- "For peronists, his assassination was a dream came true", a bizarre claim to make if you don't support it with any evidence.
- It somehow paints the Revolución Libertadora in a positive light (that it was deserved, because Peron did [x things], even though it's widely agreed upon by everyone that it was a military coup and that Aramburu became president because he was a hard-liner.
Genuinely a shameful effort - this isn't neutral in the slightest. 2A02:A44C:8BDF:1:C169:9B09:14DA:A21E (talk) 21:06, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @2A02:A44C:8BDF:1:C169:9B09:14DA:A21E 
totally biased article and an example of why Wikipedia can't be really trusted GeorgeMarg (talk) 08:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased writing