Talk:The Hrsmn

message: I have cleaned up the page and added reference to where the information is from. The group should not be deleted because the four main members have at one point in their careers had gold or platinum selling albums, the groups only release was also an extremely hyped and anticipated album, as a result i feel that this page has a high notability, the hrsmn are also mentioned on all the members pages, this page acts a portal to more information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawlessflawless (talk • contribs) 08:32, 6 November 2006
:The article still doesn't assert notability. The lead paragraph needs to explain the fact that the band members have gold or platinum albums. Otherwise readers will think that the article is about a group of nobodies. However, you convinced me not to nominate it for deletion. Good job! Just make sure the lead paragraph explains what's notable about the band or its members. =Axlq 02:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Much improved now. Excellent work. -Axlq 06:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: There should be some changes in my opinion. Somewhere is stated tha it's currently unknown who handled the majority of the production on the album while according to the albums' Wikipedia page it is known. Also, the statement that Mark Sparks produced two tracks of the nine-track version of this album is not true since he produced only one track of the nine-track version of the album and two of the ten-track edition.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.153.232.172 (talk) 20:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Correct me if i'm wrong, but "shit" isn't an expletive, is it? The article asterisks this word numerous times in Ras Kass's quote under section "2005." Maybe there is some type of official rule about this, but from my experience at least, shit and crap are not considered expletives (and often not even offensive).
97.118.64.1 (talk) 04:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Censorship?

message: Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:
* http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0nfpxq80ldfe
--CactusBot (talk) 13:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead external links to Allmusic website – December 2010 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on The Hrsmn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090603090016/http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg to http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0nfpxq80ldfe
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Hrsmn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070624084828/http://www.hiphopsite.com/NEWS/interviews.hhs to http://www.hiphopsite.com/NEWS/interviews.hhs
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified