lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pratt & Whitney J75

message: Surely there must be a better picture of a J75 than some hulk sitting in a Havana parking lot. Although probably meant as an anti-American slam, the U-2 in question was downed during the Cuban Missile Crisis when secretive Soviet attempts to turn the country into a missile base were discovered and monitored by the U-2 and other American recon aircraft. So, you're looking at a piece of American technology that averted World War III and prevented Cuba itself from being turned into a smoking hole.Jmdeur (talk) 18:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You might be reading a bit too much into that picture, but I agree that a better picture could be found. Incidentally, any truth to the old yarn that you could throw a brick in the front and see a puff of sand come out the back? Of course not, but it was a tough engine.--172.190.11.73 (talk) 00:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

message: How is a J75 actually lighter than a J57 while also being much larger and more powerful, especially if it's just a scaled up J57? I am guessing that the J57 weight includes an afterburner section while the J75 described here is a civilian model that has none, but it would be nice if the articles were more consistent and you could compare the engines with each other. Not having any idea how much an afterburner weighs I have I no idea how much heavier a J75 is generally.  Idumea47b (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  5,100lbs
Talk:Metal Black (video game)

message: Famitsu updated their site, and included their review of the game, giving it a 20/40 score. They didn't like it, it seems. Sega Retro page for this game lists several other scores. 
*Fun Generation (DE) - 40/100
*Joypad - 20/100
*neXt Level (DE) 65/100
*Sega saturn magazine (JP) 76/100
Harizotoh9 (talk) 05:27, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find the issues where the first and third reviews were featured, i'll add them to the review table. Have a good day mate! Roberth Martinez (talk) 07:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's on the sega retro page for this game. I suggest checking it out. It's all listed there, including scans fo the pages. Harizotoh9 (talk) 07:44, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

text: The ones i'm missing so far are Fun Generation (DE) and next Level. Roberth Martinez (talk) 09:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like you found them. They are in german, and G is easy to translate into English. These should be the basis for the article. Also, I see you added Allgame on there. See, I think they're a RS, but I don't think their reviews are particularily note worthy, so I try to keep them off of the review scoreboard. I've never heard of someone caring about any of their reviews. And their strategy was to hire some people to just mass review games to build a data-base. I consider their reviews pretty low tier. Harizotoh9 (talk) 05:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review scores:
Talk:Afghanistan National Television (version 2)

message: As I know Afghanistan National Television and RTA TV are same, there were not two sister TV stations. its persian an pashto name during all these years was same (persian:telviziun e melli ye Afghanistan, Pashto: Afghanistan Melli Telviziyun).--Hariva (talk) 10:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Are You Smarter than a 5th Grader? (Australian game show)

message: I added a paragraph to this article basically saying that there are an infinite number of multiples of 3 below 20, rather than the "correct" answer given in the show of "six".  It was removed in just a few minutes.  I'm wondering if it was removed because there was an issue with the factual nature of the paragraph (ie. I'm wrong) or if it was removed because it could be percieved to have cast the show in a poor light or if there was some other reason?
  
Gasdive 21:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While there are technically an infinite number of multiples of 3 below 20 (indeed, that's what I remarked when I saw it), the term multiples is generally used to describe positive integer multiples, I think.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.59.237 (talk) 00:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Remember, this show is based on Yr 5 curriculum. I think the question referred to "multiples of 3 between zero and twenty" as in no negative numbers or fractions etc, just the ones found on an ordinary times tables chart.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.238.240.208 (talk) 04:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The question was probably referring to natural multiples only (1,2....)Baggers89 (talk) 13:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Your paragraph was probably removed because it was perceived as irrelevant (i.e. including material more advanced than the 5th grade curriculum), but it may also have been perceived as wrong. In both cases, the reason it that the term "multiple" is generally used to described positive multiples, which is the meaning taught in school (it's the meaning taught at that level of school, at least). It may have been removed because it cast the show in a poor light, but Wikipedia does not tolerate any edits being made for that reason. Brian Jason Drake 04:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of multiples of 3 under 20 

message: Are the contestants on this show regular folk or casted by casting agenices? They seem to be overacting (badly) to me, I would be glad to be proven wrong however.
58.163.131.92 09:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they do seem to be overacting a bit. It seems unlikely that contestants would be chosen based on acting ability alone (or even primarily for their acting ability), however. For the second series at least, they ask a lot of questions that have nothing to do with acting, and they don't say that they want actors. I don't know anything about contestant selection though. Brian Jason Drake 04:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contestant selection 

message: Article says that one man has won $500,000 and then says that no adults have won the $500,000 prize.
98.117.124.23 (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction?
Talk:Girder

message: "The Scottish Irn-Bru was advertised as being "made in Scotland, from girders", but this claim has not been substantiated."
you actually took "Made In Scotland, From Girders" literally?! xDDD
you can't make drink from girders xD apart from maybe "Twin Tower Milkshake"i
04:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm thinking of adding a  tag to that statement.  How can you say it's not made from girders??  It's says so! - Denimadept (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  They DON'T make it from real girders?!?!! 

message: I've added a photo of Hinkle Fieldhouse, and while it's a relatively useful photo, I'm sure someone somewhere has a photo of a closeup of a girder that would be even more useful. JKBrooks85 (talk) 04:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo added 

message: The following sentences are a mess.
"Girders are often held together by high industrial strands. These strands are made up of molten steel and their job is to tie the girders into beams. The girders, with the help of the strands, can distribute the force and pressure better. Furthermore, where the strands are placed on the girder, the tensile strength of the girders is measured by how much stress it can handle."
If someone can replace them with something meaningful, that would be a significant improvement.  Otherwise, I may just delete them.
7802mark (talk) 21:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense
Talk:Nyjer Morgan

message: Any thoughts of a redirect of Tony Plush to Nyjer's page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.202.248.68 (talk) 20:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tony Plush 

message: This article seems to be written from the standpoint of defending Morgan's controversial incidents; whether or not he was at fault is irrelevant to an encyclopedia, so unless there's outside citations, we should consider re-writing this article from a more neutral perspective.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.122.167.245 (talk) 02:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias? 

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Njyer is an MLB player and every MLB player gets a wikipedia page. — 207.6.125.36 (talk) 00:41, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because he is a major league baseball player. — 67.162.139.54 (talk) 01:49, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Bram & Alice

message: I am a fan of Traylor Howard, i would like to watch this serie. 
But i do not believe to find it in French ; maybe i will have to ship the English version in.
78.230.93.177 (talk) 04:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  whatsup 

message: #1 article not available in French https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bram_%26_Alice
#2 allocine.fr shows the list of Season 1 but nobody commented http://www.allocine.fr/series/ficheserie-23/saison-45/ (PS : i cannot use allocine anymore. New CGU are abusive, i cannot sign anymore.)
#3 Bram & Alice exists on ImdB http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0319963/ but i see no flag. Cannot know if exists in spanish or FR version.
My opinion : it will be released in spanish before french. So i can wait long... :'(
Magnon86 (talk) 13:42, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not yet available in french
Talk:Cartoon Network (Japanese TV channel)

message: Here's what you need to translate (as of ):
# 概要: OK
## 番組内容と傾向: Translate
### コマーシャル: Translate
### 海外のアニメ作品: Translate
### 日本のアニメ作品: Translate
## 番組宣伝ナレーター: DO NOT TRANSLATE
## ウォーターマーク: DO NOT TRANSLATE
## カートゥーンモバイルTV: Translate
# タイムスケジュール（日本）(Programming blocks): OK
## 現在の放送ゾーン (Current): Translate
## 過去の放送ゾーン (Defunct): Translate
# 主な参加作品 (Original production): Translate
# 日本で放送中、および放送されたアニメ作品一覧 (List of programmes): Put them off
## 海外アニメ (Non-Japanese)
## CARTOONITO （カートゥーン ニト）（旧ピぽらぺポら、旧ショート・ストーリーズ）作品 (Preschoolers)
## 日本制作アニメ (Japanese)
JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 14:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of [[:ja:カートゥーン ネットワーク]] 

message: Curious. Hey guys! Welcome to my signature if you're reading this, I love ya! ~ Akram 22:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who owns the other 20%?
Talk:CNN HD

message: If there's confirmation, put it in this page...
BSkyB EPG Article says that CNN HD may be available in a few months on Sky, i don't know if it's CNN or CNN Int.
203.99.237.199 (talk) 06:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CNN HD in UK? 

message: It would be nice to see a screenshot of election coverage on HD since Wolf Blitzer always promotes the additional information on the sides of screens if watching in HD. 207.112.45.136 (talk) 20:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just charts of exit poll numbers and the like, nothing too interesting. TomCat4680 (talk) 16:33, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: America Votes 2008

message: Why does CNN HD have a separate article? I think it should be merged into the regular CNN article.TomCat4680 (talk) 16:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Calcium-sensing receptor

message: I have doubts about the validity of the part about signal transducing. This sentence "Decreased calcium binding on the extracellular side gives a conformation change in the receptor, which, on the intracellular side, initiates the phospholipase C pathway..." seems to be incorrect to me. The increase in extracellular calcium i.e. increased calcium binding to the receptor should actually activate the intracellular signalling pathway. Harmdu (talk) 18:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Comedy Central's Indecision 2008

message: "Unlike the previous "Indecision" specials, presented only by The Daily Show"... Doesn't the Midterm Midtacular count as an Indecision 2006 special?  I mention this because that show was a joint venture between TDS and TCR, which would make the previous statement incorrect. Shoemoney2night 06:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Midterm Midtacular

message: I'm new to the whole wiki thing so I'm not sure how this would work or what the best policy is, but it seems to me that - if the "Indecision 200x" stuff is going to be covered at all, which for an encyclopedia seems questionable - there should be one comprehensive article covering the changes over time and impact of the overall series. Such a condensed article could merit standing on its own feet, which is why I didn't resort to deletion. Halond 21:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that a single article makes little sense, and as this is a current news item it wouldn't make sense to merge this one even if 2004, 2000, etc... were merged. Adam McCormick 01:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge notice 

message: Is Lil' Bush still involved? I don't see any mention of them on the website any more, I haven't seen them featured in any of the commercial for Indecision 08 in a while, and from what I hear the show might be canceled before the elections anyway. Kuralyov (talk) 01:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lil' Bush?

message: In the first paragraph, it is spelt 'programmes', but in the second paragraph, it is spelt 'programs'.  I don't know what is from the original version of this article.  Personally I'd favour 'programmes', but giving this is an entirely American ordeal, I would not object too hard to the choice of American English.  --Svippong 18:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BrE vs AmE
Talk:Content rating

message: I'm going to remove the deletion message, now that the page has been edited to be unbiased. Thanks reddit!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.137.201.131 (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion message 

message: I don't believe that this article really even needs a source. In the "see also" section, there are links to articles about different individual content rating systems, and those articles feature sources. This article is about something way too broad and simple to even require a source. Disagreements? --TheFancyFedoraWielder (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be stronger if the info in the lead had something referenced to back it up. Maybe some source from the see also articles could be used for support. The tag on on the article about no sources is factually correct. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I just can't find any sources... --TheFancyFedoraWielder (talk) 20:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it even need sources?
Talk:Counterprogramming (television)

message: Out of pure curiosity and benefit of the article: what is the MOTIVATION behind Counterprogramming? Similarly, what are the reasons NOT to do it? 145.100.125.133 (talk) 11:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: There isn't any citation for this aspect at all. Personally, it's probably more of a "we don't stand a chance unless we're trying to intentionally do something distracting" situation. ViperSnake151  Talk   06:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gentleman's agreement
Talk:Content reference identifier

message: Surely a CRID is a URI, not just like one? Just as URNs are URIs?
nick (talk) 00:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 

message: Could please somebody change the title of this article from
"Crid" (mixed case) to "CRID" (upper case)?
---> http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp-pdf-files/WHP148.pdf
141.3.192.143 (talk) 14:00, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New title "CRID" instead of "Crid" 

message: Hello User:Thorwald, I think that the two technical specifications "ETSI TS 102 822-2 V1.4.1 (2007-11)" and "ETSI TS 102 822-4 V1.7.1 (2012-12)" should be cited in the "References" section of the CRID article. From my point of view, these two ETSI standards are even more important than RFC 4078 which is only an "informational" RFC. -- 2A00:1398:4:0:1845:B86C:EF41:ECC8 (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many references?
Talk:The Daily 10

message: [No person over the age of 20, or with an IQ over 75, could watch this show.]
Not exactly NPOV there now is it?174.145.168.155 (talk) 04:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: On his appearance on "Making It with Riki Lindhome", Chris Hardwick talked about E! unsuccessfully attempting to reformat the show, with him as host. (To give you a time frame, he also talked about how the failure of the reformatted pilot not being picked up led him to create his Nerdist podcast in early 2010.) Is this notable enough to mention? With all due respect, BrianGriffin-FG (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformatting 
Talk:Doubleheader (television)

message: .  Has there ever been an actual football doubleheader?  I.e. Two competitions on the same day same field. Not network television definition which is games being played on different fields with different teams. 75.72.239.111 (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double header 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Mot Moved (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 08:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Doubleheader (television) →  – The term "doubleheader" can mean both a televised double feature as well as a stadium hosting two events on the same day. SounderBruce 00:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Comment Doubleheader (baseball) already exists.  Do other sports schedule two events in the same day in this fashion? 162 etc. (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It happens in American soccer, with a few examples listed on the page. I think the baseball article would need to stay separate, but all three topics are intertwined in some way. SounderBruce 19:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 May 2023
Talk:DVB-RCS

message: My apologies to the original author but I read this article and found the paragraphs I edited to be poorly put together and they seemed 'wrong'.  I'm not qualified to make much in the way of amendments but I believe it is now less confusing and feels more 'grown up'.  I did briefly research the MFTDMA reference and am taking it to be a modification of TDMA (there are a number of google-able references relating to satellite transmissions using this protocol).  I also think that shedular was a mis-spelling...
--Thickycat (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: There is a big mistake. DVB-RCS is not a digital broadcasting technology. It is a return link specification. There is no broadcasting involved in satellite user uplink.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SatcomMan (talk • contribs) 17:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:El rescate del talismán

message: I've seen Knightmare.com's video of an other episode of the show and I don't think we are getting the whole story. Firstly, the refrences to sega related prizes should be removed as they are not the sponsors in this episode. I imagine that just like the the french version sega was only the sponsor for one season. Secondly, the host on this paticular episode doesn't seem to be a friend of the team. He yells a lot, and tells the contestant in the helmate to do the oppisite of they are supposed to do (at least I think so, I can't speak spanish).
If you understand spanish PLEASE watch the clips and contribute something.--Fantastic fred 00:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: *El Rescate Del Talisman: The list of characters needs to be expanded.--Fantastic fred 22:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Electronic Content Guide

message: I am requesting that the Electronic Content Guide article be merged into the article Electronic program guide due to its redundancy with that article. (TVtonightOKC (talk) 10:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've simply redirected the article - they obviously covered the same topic, and there was no useful content in this one that wasn't in the other already. Robofish (talk) 21:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:LTN Family

message: Assalamu alaikum janab emaan drama ki episodes upload nahi hai to meherbani Karen aur pura drama upload Karen thank u 119.152.122.59 (talk) 08:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aoa dear sir emaan darama ki 73 Sy aagy koi episode upload ni ki ha kindly upload krain as soon as possible
Talk:Hiatus (television)

message: But what about when all US tv shows take the same week or two off?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.188.135.11 (talk) 03:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  But what about... 

message: Again Wikipedia is assuming everyone understands all these strange american terms.  This article should make clear that hiatus is a term used in the USA (maybe Canada also).  All this reference to 'sweeps', 'mid-season replacements' and 'hiatus' is confusing for normal wikipedia users.  Remember this is wikipedia not us-pedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.200.200.54 (talk) 22:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US stuff 

message: maybe a bit concerning the other discussion topic around here (US stuff), this direct link to the real topic would help some people. its just that i cant get the link to work the right way: i would like the link in the text to say "sweeps" in blue as a link that, when clicked, links to the page and page mark http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nielsen_Ratings#.22Sweeps.22.
if anyone could please adjust my poor attempt at doing so, thanks a lot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.63.71.252 (talk) 00:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the changes i made 

message: I'm looking at Polyamory: Married & Dating, which claims the show has been "on hiatus" since autumn 2013. This is probably but one example of fans' irrational optimism, so I'd appreciate a guideline.Weeb Dingle (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Shows have come back from longer hiatuses than six years so it is possible. Anything would need to be verifiable there is nothing about the term in of itself to verify either way. To say either way without a source saying so is WP:OR --137.87.0.40 (talk) 23:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  actual span?
Talk:Horizontal blanking interval

message: Electrons, by definition, are negatively charged - I'm worried about the statement in this article that the electron beam in a CRT can be 'positively charged for part of the journey'. Needs verification, correction and referencing. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 12:21, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Positively charged beam?!
Talk:Hot switch

message: Maybe this should be merged with "Cold open"? The exact same text is in that article under the "Hot switch" heading.
72.220.237.117 (talk) 06:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: If anyone knows of any place where this happens at, please list them.  I searched for articles that link to this one, and found a bit about a show I then added to this article.  Surely others have done it also.  Dream Focus 20:20, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  examples