lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Obsession (Star Trek: The Original Series)

message: Is the actor in the screenshot ?  DS 14:02, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Redshirts do not have names. :P Cyberia23 15:37, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Identity

message: I was reading Bram Stoker's Dracula and noticed the smell that is described leading into the scene with the female temptresses, or vampires, is the same that is described repeatedly in this episode when the creature is near.  Also, the creature seeks red blood, or at least the part of it that is red.  I think this was a probable inspiration behind this episode, but this is just one fan's opinion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.14.48 (talk) 21:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fans' Speculations

message: Watching the remastered episode recently made me curious about the whole attitude toward the creature. It kills humans therefore it is evil. No attempt is made to communicate with it. Mid-way through the story by inference Spock surmises it has some level of intelligence, but there is no debate about whether killing it is appropriate. The possibility of confinement (perhaps with forcefields) is not even considered. Although its ability to phase may make that impossible. It is instead destroyed with about the greatest amount of overkill ever leveled at an adversary on the show--blown apart by an anti-matter explosion. This is justified on the flimsy reasoning it is about to spawn and reproduce numerous creatures like itself (how Spock knows this is never explained). No curiousity is shown about its origins or its ability to engage in interstellar travel at warp speed. It has been many years since the initial incident -- where has it been? If it regularly engages in the killing of living things why is it seemingly not widely villified or the object of infamy? Instead it is obscure and the original incident was many years ago and not widely known. Is it the last of its kind a la the salt creature in "The Man Trap"? None of these perspectives or mysteries are considered. Compare with the attitude toward alien entities shown in episodes like "Devil in the Dark" and "Metamorphosis". Is this worth commenting on in the article? Dgabbard (talk) 18:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Philosophical musings

message: I wrote a mirror story for the episode “Mirror, Mirror”, covering everything that happened but from the point of view of the mirror characters, and verbatim repeating the conversation between Spock and the mirror Kirk in the brig.  In it, Garrovick is Kirk’s personal guard. Thought it might be appropriate. GBC (talk) 18:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fan fiction usually isn't. Lots42 (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Apochrypha

message: So many Trek episodes show someone appearing on the transporter pad in a different position then what they were beamed up in. Just food for thought. Lots42 (talk) 10:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transporting
Talk:WWE Day of Reckoning 2

message: Okay, this reads more like a review than an article. I'm also not too sure about the neutrality; the article seems to overwhelmingly state that DoR 2 is a fantastic game that's better than the first in so many ways (perhaps it reads like an advertisement). Now, I'm not going to go out of my way to change this (at least until I own the game), but I would appreciate it if somebody could make a few changes to improve the article's quality.
* I've cleaned up the article a bit, trimmed away the none encyclopedic and PoV parts. I can't really vouch for the accuracy, since I've just been using the original text, and haven't played the game myself. Still needs some work. Darksun 20:46, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This goes out to anybody who has created a CAW in the game.When your making a CAW go to Paint Tool part make a logo save it.Go to Body base then go to tattoo, get a tattoo from the paint tool, select your logo that you just made.Put it on any part of your body thats visible.You'll see that it's nowhere to be found.Go to your CAW's entrance and you will see your logo, you see it needs some ajustments.Go back to creating your CAW and the tattoo is gone.You go back to entrance and it will reapeare.This makes it fustrating for me because I can't ajust the tattoo without looking at it.I bought the same game again at another store and it does the same thing.The question is does the same glitch apply on any other WWE Day of Reckoning 2 owners out there?
:Yes it does. But this is wikipedia. not a video game forum.Koberulz 08:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paint Tool Glitch 

message: Will there be a Day of Reckoning 3 -- Metal Maiden 15:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe I heard something about it a while ago. We'll probably hear more when the Wii is released. Koberulz 14:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Day of Reckoning 3? 

message: Is the trivia section really that necessary?  I mean, things like "In only certain arenas does Randy Orton's pyro appear".  Is it really needed?  Metros232 13:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: I just added the PPVs and links over the old, not professonal looking text.
If theres any I forgot, please add them.
72.12.130.133 (talk) 23:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed up the PPVs 

message: wasnt christian a World heavyweight champion of some sort in this game?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.178.177 (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian
Talk:Zephyr

message: Zephyrhills,Fl.  A town 30 miles north of Tampa on U.S. Highway 301. It hosts world class events at its World World 2 II deactivated Naval training station airport.
o baby
::added Zephyrhills. Paptilian (talk) 23:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added 

message: Shouldn't the first thing on the list be a redirect to wind, followed by 'a word to describe a light breeze'? I see no mention of wind anywhere. 81.77.28.178 (talk) 12:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, a hatnote link. 
*Wikipedia:Disambiguation
*Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation
*Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages
Paptilian (talk) 23:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: A light Breeze

message: I request for someone to add Zephyrus (album) by The Oh Hellos under the music albums sections. MirageTheShadow (talk) 21:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it have an article? —swpbT • beyond • mutual 15:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albums addition request
Talk:Commonwealth realm

message: Rhodesia was never a Commonwealth Realm. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 17:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Gerard von Hebel, you’re absolutely correct, a country called Rhodesia has never legally existed.Frenchmalawi (talk) 04:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Rhodesia

message: I believe that the map for this article should show current Commonwealth Realms and their territories (shown in the latter map) instead of former realms and dominions that are now republics (shown in the former map). The current map excludes many former colonies which maintained the monarch up to a later period than former dominions, for example many former African colonies. I believe the map should only show the present realms, and I would welcome thoughts on this matter. AlloDoon (talk) 11:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: But the excluded colonies are colonies not independent states. I don't understand the rationale for removing all the independent states that were once realms or dominions. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: I don't believe Grenada uses the "United Kingdom" in its monarch's title/style, anymore - effective upon Charles III's accession. Thus for the moment, leaving Canada as the only non-UK realm continuing to use the "United Kingdom". GoodDay (talk) 15:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grenada 

message: Again, per Talk:Commonwealth realm/Archive 21#Realms by region, there was a clear consensus from the participants involved that the listing of regions was not necessary. To reiterate the participants' points, it adds "confusion", was a "pointless addition resulting in unnecessary debate [and] Adds nothing", and to reiterate my own arguments is a category that doesn't provide "any real context to the article topic itself (that is, what is a CR)" and is something that could be expounded on in the section's lead paragraph. The conversation afterwards was myself attempting to bridge this rationale to exclude population as well, but I was unsuccessful in swaying the participants there. 
If you or anyone would like to reexplore this discussion, I would be more than happy to, but I believe the last discussion on the issue made it clear that there is an existing consensus among the page's editors not to include regions for now. Leventio (talk) 04:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regions discussion redux
Talk:Access Software

message: Just wondering why Indie Games redirects here instead of Indie game. I can understand the fact that it's because the company worked under the moniker for a year, but it seems more appropriate to link to the Indie Game article than here. Maybe an Indie_Games(Company) redirect would be better. GreenSixSided (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose primarily because of the capitalization. Thus far, this hasn't created any issues, as Indie games has the correct target. Creating more redirects should not be the solution as it would need to be piped anyway. IceWelder [✉] 13:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess so. Although it does get a little confusing. GreenSixSided (talk) 19:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indie Games Redirect
Talk:Accumulated cyclone energy

message: I read many sources articles written that Ioke's record is 85~85.3, why is it only 82 here. Bóng Ma - Talk 21:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably comes down to how you handle the JMAs winds for Ioke.Jason Rees (talk) 22:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yep, and now, Freddy has reached 82.2 ACE points, has this record been surpassed or not? Vệ Thần - Talk 21:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's wait and find out what BT and the WMO says. Jason Rees (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ioke record 

message: The links to the second reference (Climate Assessment for 1999) is not working for me, neither the link to the URL nor the DOI. I'm reporting it here rather than identifying it as a bad link or fixing it on the chance that it's a one-off glitch that will be fixed by itself.
If it isn't a short-term glitch, I believe the article can be found at Climate Assessment for 1999 S Philbrick(Talk) 17:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible link error 

message: The Western Pacific section only has the years since 1950 and I was wondering if the section could be expanded to include individual storms. Some of them may be outdated, I know, but it is really necessary. tai (he/him) (talk) 16:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension of WPAC ACE section
Talk:Terri Schiavo timeline/Archive 1

message: I'm not inclined to include in the timeline grandstanding statements by third parties. Tom DeLay's comments don't actually affect Terri. His calling Terri to testify did. If we put in every comment made by someone that mentions Terri, we'll blow the size limit in a heartbeat. I'd rather limit the timeline to actions that directly impact Terri. comments and grandstanding can go in the full text article about Terri.  FuelWagon 15:31, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: that is a valid argument. Kingturtle 01:41, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments by third parties

message: Why doesn't this page mention bulemia? Efm
:I suppose it could by quoting the actual medical records. --Viriditas  | Talk 10:30, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bulimia

message: This timeline says:
:1991
:Michael begins studying nursing at St. Petersburg Community College to better care for his wife. He eventually becomes a respiratory therapist and an emergency room nurse.
But that isn't correct, because:
1) He first became a respiratory therapist (not a nurse), so he presumably was studying respiratory therapy (not nursing).
2) Terri didn't require respiratory therapy, so Michael's claim that his motive was to better care for her is not credible.  If he'd wanted to care for her, he would have studied something that would have been helpful to her.
3) By the time he went back to school to become a nurse, he'd already been forbidding rehabilitation and therapy for Terri for many years.
4) Despite his promise to do so (under oath, in the 1992 malpractice court), Michael never made any effort to bring Terri home and care for her himself.
5) Didn't we determine that he began his studies at the community college in 1992 or 1993?  I'm not sure about this, but I recall that it was discussed heavily in Talk:Terri_Schiavo a while ago.  NCdave 17:19, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nursing 

message: This timeline says:
:1991
:July 19: Terri Schiavo is transferred to Sable Palms skilled care facility where she receives neurological testing as well as speech and occupational therapy until 1994. 
But that isn't correct.  She received no therapy of any kind in either 1993 or 1994, and very little after the autumn of 1991.  Her therapy ended because her parents ran out of money to pay for it (Michael was unemployed, and was being supported by Terri's parents).  The malpractice award money was paid out in January, 1993, but Terri's therapy did not resume, because Michael refused to permit it. NCdave 17:33, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date therapy ended
Talk:Jamestown Red Sox

message: Needs more about the team's history.  The article refers only to 1934. —Theo  (Talk) 14:41, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Wikipedia talk:Missing science topics/NIST Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures

message: Generated from the index on Fri Aug 12 13:59:57 2005. --R.Koot 14:47, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

message: The terms listed in the NIST Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures can be very limited to only the algorithms as defined in that U.S. document, rather than necessarily representing a global view of algorithm descriptions. Hence, the terms in the list might be inappropriate as notable topics for Wikipedia, where perhaps "Crochemore-Perrin string matching" might fail to get much coverage in mainstream media. Beware dictionaries prepared by the U.S. Federal Government, because at times, a word-tyrant will come to power in a U.S. agency and command a lot of people to start documenting his vocabulary (to keep their jobs), and most people will let it happen because no one really cares enough about "nerd-words" to risk confrontation.  Years later, history often reveals that the tyrant's compedium of nerd-words has become some sort of twisted, de facto standard. For example, when the World Wide Web was first created, font sizes were called "1, 2, 3 and 4" rather than "12-point" or "pica" or "elite" fonts. Of course, typsetting experts would want to wretch and puke at the naive, juvenile, and yes, infantile, notion that font-sizes should be called "1/2/3". Also, consider the monumental design flaw to use the 6-character connoction " " to represent a non-breaking space, used thousands of times in webpages. A savvy computer scientist might have selected the symbol "#" to be activated for "words#stick#together" by the technique of setting metacharacters; or even try "&n;" but instead, " " has become the standard for spacing now, violating the rule against "committing perverted acts of gross indecency with a computer language". Similarly, there is little resistance to tyrants naming other stuff "ga-ga" or "goo-goo" or "wah-wah" or "discrete interval encoding tree" because dictionary watchdogs are extremely rare in society, and easily fired or "promoted" out of sight. Bottom line, beware thousands of peculiar nerd-words as article topics. -Wikid77 (talk) 07:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Considerations for worldwide perspective

message: I came here from WP:Computer science as it was number 3 on the list of things to do to help the project. However looking through the list (and the site in the external lists) it appears that most things on this list seem pointless to create an article about. It seams most of these red links are just general terms or specific cases, which are should be covered in other (already existing) articles, or which simply warrant a dictionary entry... after all isn't Wikipedia not a dictionary?
Isaac Oscar (talk) 15:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is possible that  they should be simple redirects to sections in other articles, to whole articles or just not exist on WP.  They should be thought of as "candidates for articles". All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 18:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this list important?
Talk:Minchiate

message: in sicilian dialect minchia means "dick" so minchione in the article translated as "fool" is the literally "big dick" --Melaen 14:54, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw that someone had added a bit about this word to the article on Latin profanity, and mentions it as a survival from Classical mentula.  The etymology seems plausible, and I have added it and appropriate links to the article.  Thanks.  Smerdis of Tlön 14:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * I support an introductory page with all of the tarot family of card games listed. Ideally this should be under tarot, but there you run into the conflict with the occultists. The name in the English language for the family of card games is Tarot, and since this is the English version of Wikipedia, the term in English should be the prefered one. In other languages it is Tarock, Taraut, Tarocco (Tarocchi), etc. They are all related trick-taking card games with a common origin. That is why they are all included in Michael Dummett's book The Game of Tarot . They do not use identical cards of course. That is because of divergences in playing card fashions and suit signs in each region. In german speaking areas of Switzerland, they use the 1JJ Tarot pack with Italian suit signs. In Sicily, they use the unique Tarocco Siciliano pack. There are also Tarocco Piedmontese, Tarocco Bolognese, and other packs from Milan, etc. There are at least three distinct versions of the Austrian-style Tarock pack. Then there are the French tarot versions with the arabic numerals on the top. These are all tarot playing cards, and are used to play related games. The question is, why are Tarock and Tarocchi on the same page, while French Tarot is on another? Tarock and French Tarot have french suit symbols, while Tarocco uses Italian suit signs. There should be one introductory article for the family of tarot games (similar to the presentation in the Tarocchi article), then individual main articles on each regional variation (with cards used, style of play, regional variations, etc.). This is what is done with other cards games such as Rummy, where there are many variations and regional games. Most of the Rummy family of games are listed in a special section of the article. I think that Tarot (game) should be the general page, and perhaps a special page created for "French Tarot", Tarocco (Tarrochi), Troccas (Swiss), Austrian-style Tarock, and Minchiate. The problem with all this evidently arises due to the unique situation of one family of card games having varying playing card standards in various regions. -- Parsa 21:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tarot Family of card games
Talk:Playoff Bowl

message: I believe this paragraph should be modified or removed:
:Using the Playoff Bowl (and loss) as motivation in 1965, the Packers won the first of three consecutive NFL championships from (1965-67. As of 2007, the Packers are the only NFL team ever to achieve this "three-peat" in the post-season era (which began in 1933). During this successful run, the Packers also won the first two Super Bowls in convincing fashion. In an ironic twist, Lombardi's final game (and victory) as head coach of the Packers was Super Bowl II, played in "hinky-dink" Miami's Orange Bowl in January 1968.
It is interesting and true, but this POV seems to take the spotlight off of the article's topic (The Playoff Bowl) and instead directs the reader's attention to the non-Playoff Bowl accomplishments of the Packers, which are well-documented elsewhere.--Son of Somebody 18:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya think? Wahkeenah 00:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup!--Son of Somebody 16:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then it's time for a "trim". Gopher it. Wahkeenah 18:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Packers agenda

message: I reaad an article on Mental Floss written by Alex Watt titled "The NFL Used to Play a Thrid Place Game, a "Losers' Bowl for Losers." The article actually cites the data used on the Playoff Bowl page, so I thought it was worth adding it as a citation.  Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 20:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent article regarding the Playoff Bowl
Talk:XHTML Friends Network

message: isn't this similar to semantic web?
: It contributes to the Semantic web, but is only complementary, it does not replace the Semantic Web. --Vincent 10:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Semantic web query

message: The introduction section looks like it was copied verbatim from http://gmpg.org/xfn/intro
— deathlime 10:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright violation? 

message: I couldn't find a single mention of the word "microformat" on the XFN homepage, although XFN obviously is a microformat. Why don't they use that term?  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.162.15.87 (talk) 19:10, August 20, 2007 (UTC) 
I think the link to the irc channel should be removed, I entered and no one was there, only me.
I also think that some examples should be added like mentioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.127.76.139 (talk) 21:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  microformat? 

message: I don't know enough about it, but I am sure WordPress uses XFN in their 'links' section in the software. Should this be mentioned as an important implementation (millions of blogs worldwide)?
Blonkm (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WordPress?
Talk:Black Pullet

message: I have added a new version of the article with my own wording, also I did further research on the net to try to find viable sources and information regarding the book. Of course I will attempt to continue my search for more articles or sources that apply to this notable book - I do not wish to see this article be deleted.
Note: 
*1 all terms in quotation marks are direct quotes from the book itself. 
*2 I re-wrote the article and added my own knowledge of the book from reading it.
*3 Feel free to edit or apply changes according to whatever you believe is correct.
Piecraft 15:08, 29 August 2005 (UTC)