Talk:Good Enough (Evanescence song)

message: i dont think that this should be put up as a single until we hear further info that is in ENGLISH or put up on Evanescence.com or Evthreads.com
:The statement was in English, it was just reported on a foreign site.  It's still a legitamate news website. -- Huntster T • @ • C 11:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Good Enough source 

message: i think it is fake because they haven't spelled 'together again' correctly. but then again, in Australia's CMWYS they spelled some things wrong. Zacanescence 04:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Precisely the reason I removed it, along with the probability that the track titles were faked (white text didn't match anything else).  Also appeared that the "Good Enough" text was simply ripped off the previously fake album cover.  While it is possible that this was similar to the Aussie situation, after that embarrassment, you'd think they'd work in better quality control. -- Huntster T • @ • C 12:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD Cover 

message: Technically, this song isn't a rock/alternative rock song. Should the genre be changed to something else... or is it more convinient to leave the genre as 'alternative rock'? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tokyo0521 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not just that it's more convenient, but its the only genre that the majority of editors can agree to.  Unless something can be directly cited, its been decided to just leave everything as alt-rock. -- Huntster T • @ • C 04:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah seriously! It should be classified as a ballad!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.130.20 (talk) 17:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Genre 

message: I read on The Evanescence Reference that Together Again is the Narnia Song and was inspired by movie. Amy herself confirmed this during an interview on evanescencewebsite.com. 12.214.76.88 02:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's all well and good, but when you consider that the producers of the movie have said there was never any such thing as an Evanescence or Amy Lee Narnia song, such a "confirmation" is completely irrelevant. -- Huntster T • @ • C 03:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks, and please understand I wasn't trying to come down hard on you, but in light of a third party statement by the movie producers saying one thing, a first-person interview with Lee simply cannot be trusted. -- Huntster T • @ • C 23:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Together Again

message: why are the lyrics there?
and why would they be there at all? Zacanescence 05:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for removing them Zacanescence, full song lyrics for modern (and non-free) songs are never permissible on Wikipedia articles. -- Huntster T • @ • C 10:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics under 'references in other media' 

message: I read the tracklisting for the Maxi single on The Evanescence Reference. I won't add it to the article, but I will put it here.12.214.76.88 02:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, we just can't include it in the article until we have a source to back it up.  Amy-Fan.org, the originator of this information, doesn't say where it got the information, so it remains suspect. Thanks! -- Huntster T • @ • C 05:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I know, just reiterating the reason for not including it on the article itself (in case others are reading this page). Thanks! -- Huntster T • @ • C 23:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maxi Single Tracklisting 

message: It is true that Together Again is not a B-Side but then Amy Lee said that there will be no B-side for this song and maybe just maybe I think that Together Again will be used for something different like maybe a OST Munnkey 12:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She had said in this interview that Together Again will not be a b-side to this single. She also mentioned in the same interview that the song "isn't quite finished" and that she's "saving it for a rainy day". If you have a reliable source about the song being in an OST, great. But I don't think the information would be placed into this particular article as this article is about the Good Enough single and not so much the almost/rumoured b-side to the single.  AngelOfSadness  talk  14:37, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Side 

message: Here is the final tracklist for this single:
# Good Enough - Radio Edit
# Good Enough - Acoustic From Intl Live
# Your Star - Live From Tokyo
# Good Enough - Video
source: http://www.amazon.de/Good-Enough-Premium-Evanescence/dp/B000WXK7GW/
I contacted the German record company SonyBMG and they told me, this single will be released on December 14, 2007 in Germany. The video is already playing (I have already seen it). 
The single will be released as basic (track 1+2) and premium (all 4 tracks)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DesperateHouseman (talk • contribs) 23:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for scouting this information, I've updated the article accordingly. -- Huntster T • @ • C 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, based on Amazon.de, the singles are apparently delayed yet again, with no timeframe given for release. -- Huntster T • @ • C 02:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final tracklist 

message: Just to clarify 72.84.38.176's statement of "Sources say that the flames used in the 'Good Enough' video were, in fact, real."  As seen in Evanescence - The Making of "Good Enough", the flames are real; however, the shot where Amy sits among the flames while the set burns down is an edit in post production.  There are some flames in the background while she sings, but they're controlled and not nearly as immense as in the final video cut. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ]:[ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 00:26, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Fire? 

message: I think i mightve found a chart possision for good enough on the Portugal Top 50, but im not so sure if it cualifies as a reliable source http://acharts.us/song/29776 24.139.117.90 (talk) 18:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, no. In this instance, acharts uses a source that isn't permissible. For future reference, please see WP:GOODCHARTS for a breakdown of what is out there, what is good, and what is bad. It's pretty easy to use. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: CHARTS

message: The song has been classified as a piano ballad for quite some time now, and its referenced in the composition section (i think), and even if it isnt, i assumed that a consensus had been reached since no one changed the genre for quite some time, and now someone is changing it to rock music. I honestly doont understand what the fuss is about, it is a piano ballad, why? because It IS a ballad , and its main instrument IS a piano, these are cold hard facts people, just because evanescence is a rock band doesnt mean that every single one of their songs will be rock, if its not rock, dont change it to rock just because evanescence is rock, i dont think it would be a good idea to start this genre debate all over again, whoever it is, i please request that you leave it as a piano ballad, thank you 24.139.117.90 (talk) 21:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre...again

message: Where did these come from? They aren't listed on Amazon.de. --Markhoris (talk) 18:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lengths for the songs on the Good Enough single 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Good Enough (Evanescence song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071028133537/http://www.vh1.com/news/articles/1540914/story.jhtml to http://www.vh1.com/news/articles/1540914/story.jhtml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mad.tv/news/?id=25137
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://evanescence.com/news.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091118015531/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=129880 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=129880
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.blender.com/guide/articles.aspx?id=2076
*Added  tag to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=162133
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified