lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:King's Bench Prison

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation of articles regarding specific prisons here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 01:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: Someone put a banner that the section on notable inmates needs citations.  Really?  Lists of notable people from cities don't need such citations.  Isn't it enough that the person's article states they were in the prison? - kosboot (talk) 01:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed for notable inmates? 

message: I overheard on one of our sister projects Wiktionary that "Abbot's Priory" was a popular term for this. Could something like this possibly be added?
Regards
2001:56A:FA36:9C00:20B1:5982:D063:C0F5 (talk) 01:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbot's Priory
Talk:Princess Wanda

message: Poles? Poles did not existed before 920 AD -_-.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.77.94.33 (talk) 15:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know how to tell you this, but this is a.... legend.Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Poles
Talk:Nelson's milksnake

message: We should really have some photos of a typical specimen. An albino is not really very good as the only provided example. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:14, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  We should have some non-albino photos 
Talk:Marsham Towers

message: As someone who worked there for many years, I never heard the building described as "Marsham Towers".  Certainly the notepaper was headed simply, "Department of the Environment, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 4DB".  "Marsham Towers" was, however, the name used by the canteen, always eager to aggrandise itself into a "staff restaurant".  Deipnosophista (talk) 14:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title misleading
Talk:Clerkenwell Bridewell

message: If anyone is interested, I have proposed a new Wikiproject concerning prisons here.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: The image on this page Bridewell_prison_rebuilt_after_the_Great_Fire.gif is probably *not* the Clerkenwell Bridewell prison, but instead the Bridewell Palace (prison) on the Fleet River, which burned in theGreat Fire of London.  You can see from the map of the Great Fire that it did not reach Clerkenwell.
I suggest that this image be removed, and hopefully replaced with an accurate image. -- Russell Thomas (talk) 20:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image is probably incorrect
Talk:Tactical Communications Wing RAF

message: Could anyone out there write a little bit on what Brutus entailed and why getting the "shite-hawk" badge at the end was so important?! When I've spoken to TCW old-boys in the past they get very animated about it and get a glint in their eye! Someone out there could rustle something up surely!? Cheers! --LookingYourBest (talk) 20:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brutus 

message: The TCW and 90SU Branch of the Royal Air Forces Association.  Formed on 01 Apr 10 the Branch has been created not only to promote the relevance and aims of RAFA but also to be a focal point for current and ex serving members of the Unit.  To develop further the friendships and the esprit de corps they experienced whilst serving on the Unit.
There has been for many years an interest in forming an Association/Organization for those who have served, or are serving, on the most prestigious Unit in the RAF.  It is hoped that the RAFA Branch will provide the conduit for this.
Being the first virtual Branch of RAFA this initiative has paved the way for similar Branches to be formed within the Association.  It has created a new method of promoting RAFA and demonstrating that it has as much relevance today as the day it was formed.
The RAFA Branch will ensure that the Unit Memorial, dedicated in 2008, and located at the Armed Forces Memorial Arboretum will stand as apermanent reminder to those who lost their lives whilst serving in the Royal Air Force.  For those wishing to visit the emorial it is situated at the beginning of the RAF Section.  A suitable location for considering that TCW are inevitably the first Unit to deploy in support of conflicts past and present.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.185.124 (talk) 09:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TCW & 90SU RAFA BRANCH AND UNIT MEMORIAL 

message: I propose that Tactical Communications Wing RAF be merged into No. 90 Signals Unit RAF. The majority of this article is duplicated on the 90SU page and parts that are not could easily be explained within a TCW section. -LÒÓkingYourBest(Talk|Edits) 17:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion moved across to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:No._90_Signals_Unit_RAF#Merger_proposal -LÒÓkingYourBest(Talk|Edits) 09:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Wood Street Compter

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation of articles regarding specific prisons here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 01:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: I've put the  template on the east side of Wood St towards the bottom.  The best I can do for the location is that it was on the east side, out of sight of the street behind some houses, between St Peters and St Michaels  Was Mitre Court the original access street? The satellite pics show that block being redeveloped, was there archaeology done as part of the planning process?82.3.241.225 (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Having unearthed the summary of the dig at One Wood St, it seems it must have been just north of Mitre Court - or it was on the site of the wine cellars but they ripped out everything before letting their wine near two-centuries-worth of prisoner detritus!!!! 82.3.241.225 (talk) 20:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: What is comput 102.89.34.13 (talk) 18:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming you are asking "what is a compter?" - See Compter: "A compter, sometimes referred to as a counter, was a type of small English prison controlled by a sheriff. The inmates were usually civil prisoners, for example dissenters and debtors." Paul W (talk) 09:11, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compter
Talk:Ilyushin Il-112

message: I recently made [an edit] which added details to some citations. It would be nice if someone proficient in Russian would check the translated titles. Scotteaton92 (talk) 15:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated titles 

message: The "Wing Area" in the Specs is shown as 300m² which is about 4x the area of any similar aircraft.  It implies a chord of about 10m (30ft).  Seems a bit extreme - is anybody able to confirm the wing dimensions? Santamoly (talk) 00:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wing Area? 

message: The article states that "the first flight of the developmental aircraft of the Il-112 will be around the middle of 2017".  But it's now 5 years later, and the aircraft is in production and being flown about the place to airshows, etc.  Perhaps the article can be fixed up to bring it into the present? Santamoly (talk) 03:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is a work in progress - you are welcome to update the article if you have reliable sources. MilborneOne (talk) 11:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article is more up to date than the original comment implies - the latest stuff is in the Operational History section - currently the article is a little disjointed, but it probably needs to indicate the large slippages in the programme and the weight problems.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behind the times
Talk:Martone

message: I've been trying to sort out what is happening, and I was stumped by a redirect to the Doherty disambiguation page. I think... but I'm not sure... that the intention is to redirect someone interested in Martone amplifiers to Doherty amplifiers.
Is that right? I'm going to add a  statement to the top of the article. Hopefully that will help. If I've misunderstood, please comment here.--CaroleHenson (talk) 05:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article / Redirect changes
Talk:Marzi, Calabria

message: ma marzi hona chata hn tu ap logo mujha kaya do gya  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.178.250.85 (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  badarali@yahoo.com 

message: ma marzi hona chata hn tu ap logo mujha kaya do gya. mjh apan gar or pasa ya sub kuch do.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.178.250.85 (talk) 05:28, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  badarali@yahoo.com
Talk:Domus Conversorum

message: ...says Edward III expelled the Jews from England, not Edward I... (9th edition) ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caelum.empyreum (talk • contribs) 06:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black's Law Dictionary  

message: Since the illustration's original caption  includes Domus Conversorum, Oxford and its dates is "The Domus Conversorum in Oxford, demolished in 1750." necessary? Mcljlm (talk) 05:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration caption
Talk:Serjeant's Inn

message: There is a plaque where the Fleet St Inn was stating 'Site of Old Serjeants' Inn 1415-1910'. This appears to conflict with dates stated in this article. (Adamgpope (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Plaque
Talk:Stanley Donwood

message: Removing that nonsense.  If anyone finds reputable sources doubting his existence as an individual, please put the statement back with a citation. Relaxing 16:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed existence

message: After a quick Google, it looks like this is a tiny band looking for publicity. If anyone can provide any evidence that this is the case, feel free.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enaku (talk • contribs) 04:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Microphone Stand?

message: "Donwood is known for his close association with the British rock group Radiohead, having created all their album and poster art."
I don't know too much about Stanley Donwood, but if they met in 1994, that surely must mean he didn't create the album-art for Radiohead's first album, Pablo Honey...(?)
Can anybody clear this up? 85.159.97.1 (talk) 14:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donwood created all posters and album-art for Radiohead? 

message: This is rather odd. 29th October was not his birthday back when he was at school. I would have noticed, because that's my birthday! 81.158.74.245 (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pokémon/Species

message: "Any articles that are within the scope of this project should be tagged with . To this banner, you should add species=yes as this will automatically put the page into Category:Pokémon species task force articles." is this really neccessary? can't we just use either the master list, or a conglomerate of :Category:Pokémon species by generation? -PokeZap (Zappernapper) 16:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That kind of system is the norm for task forces I think. FunPika 13:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  tagging 

message: Before asking about making a species article see if one has already been started.
*Bulbasaur evolution line
*Charmander evolution line
*Squirtle
*Jynx
*Torchic
*Lucario
The main thing any article needs is notablitiy. It would be wise to find good "Critical reception" before even attempting to make an article. --Blake (talk) 21:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pokémon species userpace articles

message: What do you think about making updated Pokémon species articles in the Project space. 
:Example: Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon/Species/Lucario or Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon/Lucario 
Or, making them on the actual pages with the redirect still on the top of the page. So, they will still redirect, but anybody that wants to help can click back and edit the article. I dont like having these articles in our userspace, and I would like to see what current, updated species articles would look like. Then they can work from there. I just want to know where we can put these articles legally. --Blake (talk) 19:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On a side note, I found some articles like "Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon/Shroomish evolutionary line" and "Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon/Jynx evolutionary line". What should we do with these? --Blake (talk) 03:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Space Articles. 

message: I have noticed that some articles are combined, for example Abra, Kadabra, and Alakazam or Caterpie, Metapod, and Butterfree and I was wondering do we do this when all three (or two, in the case of Nosepass and Probopass )do we group them up? (Lunashy (talk) 06:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it depends on how notable each individual one is. Some (like Charmander, Charmeleon, and Charizard) are notable enough for each one to have its own, but usually combining the evolutionary line into one article is better. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 18:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  evolution lines
Talk:Atlantic Coast Conference baseball tournament

message: Can you write a small history of the tournament's format from 1973 to present...kind of like what the SEC Baseball Tournament page has? Seancp 16:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How does it look now? Jober14 19:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks outstanding!  I never knew all that about the ACC tournament so you've educated me!  It sucks for Wikipedia purposes that they've had so many messed up formats. Seancp 19:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Jober, just wanted to reiterate that you're doing a most excellent job on this and all the ACC Tourney pages! I just re-read this page and the history really helps to clear a lot of stuff up. Good work sir! Oughgh 20:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Anyone have any idea why Duke didn't participate in the 1986 tournament?  In both 1985 and 1987, all eight teams qualified for the tournament, but in 1986, 8th-place Duke was left out.
Also, in trying to put together the article for that tournament, does anyone have a seven-team double-elimination bracket handy?  Kithira  (talk) 20:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea on Duke being left out, but does this bracket work - ? Billcasey905 (talk) 22:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like it would, I'll know for sure when I get around to making the article.  Thanks.  Kithira  (talk) 23:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, since 1986 did not have a single-elimination play-in round, that template wouldn't work for that year.  Kithira  (talk) 05:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duke in 1986?
Talk:Western Savanna Province

message: Acording to Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities/Article guidelines, we are still missing sections on:
*Academic profile
*Research and endowment
*Student life
... anyone care to help me write them?  David Bailey (talk) 12:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: These would be good additions (although I'm not volunteering), the lead paragraph could also do with expanding (see WP:LEAD) but watch out for any potential Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.— Rod talk 12:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Rod... I'm not a brilliant writer anyway.  I prefer to leave that sort of work to others, then help out with the formatting, linking, references, spelling and grammar.   Maybe I've been a professional webmaster too long!  Just so that everyone else is aware, I do declare my interests and affiliations on my user page.  David Bailey (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article structure
Talk:Borough Compter

message: There are continual confusions over the use of the term 'Bermondsey' when the area is actually 'Southwark'. 79.75.2.246 (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation of articles regarding specific prisons here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 01:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons
Talk:Papasidero

message: This material closely resembles  --Greenmaven (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation 
Talk:Poultry Compter

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation of articles regarding specific prisons here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 01:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: Reference no. 1 -- The site with the URL http://www.infopt.demon.co.uk/1772news.htm is dead and should be updated to the current site http://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/1772news.htm
Rictornorton (talk) 14:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:List of National Trust for Scotland properties

message: It's misleading the say the islands are owned by the NTS. The trust only owns a few areas on these islands not the whole islands.  Most of of the land is in private ownership, with some owned by the RSPB (Yell) and preumably still the MOD (Unst).  Source Haswell Smith.--JBellis 16:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unst & Yell 

message: I propose to reorganise the list of NTS houses and gardens into a table with property name, region and date of acquisition as headers, which are then sortable by the reader. I want to have the dates of acquisition displayed in an easily accessible form without hindering the search by region as it is now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pollypeaches (talk • contribs) 22:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of acquisitions by date
Talk:The Wild Center

message: There is no need for two separate articles; the museum's official name is Natural History Museum of the Adirondacks, while the 'Wild Center' thing is simply an ad campaign thing. Duke53 | Talk 16:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

message: After NO other discussion here somebody went ahead and merged the two articles; there should be only one article, entitled Natural History Museum of the Adirondacks. Duke53 | Talk 18:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:AvoDerm

message: I rewrote the article being careful to write "to the point" without promoting this product or company by naming any products by name. The article describes the history of the product, why the product is of interest nutritionally to one searching (select ingredient). Noles1984 16:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What about the fact that avacado is toxic to many non-human animals including dogs, and that this food has not been tested to be safe for consumption? I think that's a pretty important point to add in.....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.188.14.114 (talk) 00:04, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Toxicity
Talk:Rossano

message: The official name of the city is Rossano, not Rossano Calabro. 'Rossano Calabro' is just an informal name, used to further differentiate it from 'Rossano Veneto', which is a different city located in the Veneto Region.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bold Italic (talk • contribs) 19:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rossano vs Rossano Calabro
Talk:Idaho State Historical Society

message: *Got through the intro and "historic sites"... will continue in a few hours. Livitup (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: I have boldly merged two sentences of content on the Boise, Idaho based documentary photographer E. L. "Shorty" Fuller the the "Research Library" subsection of this article, as the Society holds 3,000 of his negatives, as well as prints and ephemera.  The result of his AfD was merge to this article. Please let me know if anyone objects to the added content. Netherzone (talk) 01:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content added from [[E. L. "Shorty" Fuller]] which was closed as merge to Idaho State Historical Society
Talk:Iraq War intelligence dispute

message: The article is currently titled Pre-Iraq War Intel Conspiracy Theory.
I'm removing the term "conspiracy theory" (a pejorative term which is almost invariably used to dismiss claims as misconceived, paranoid, unfounded, outlandish, irrational, or otherwise unworthy of serious consideration) for the following reasons:
*Unless we can cite a reliable source who refers to this as a conspiracy theory, our use of the term is original research.  Wikipedia is not in the business of deciding who's a conspiracy theorist and who's not.
*Use of the term is a clear violation of WP:NPOV.  Articles should let the facts speak for themselves and let the reader decide whether a theory deserves to be dismissed.  Competing views should be expressed with a consistently fair and sensitive tone.  We should write articles with the tone that all positions presented are at least plausible.
*Loaded terms like this one have no place in an article title, where they invite readers to make up their minds before reading the article.
Sideshow Bob Roberts 16:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Except this is a conspiracy theory, and it is outlandish just as the Roswell crash landing claims are outlandish.  Especially as two government reports have since debunked these claims. -- Jfraatz 19:00, 26 July 2007
This page (as it now reads Iraq War intelligence dispute) has plenty of scope for improvement. I will attempt to expand it over the next few weeks. smb 21:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Yigupai

message: I'd be in favor of moving the main title of this wiki to the "Doubting Antiquity School," rather than the awkward pinyin of Yigupai. No one in English refers to the New Culture Movement in its pinyin form, and so on. Also, I do not know how useful the long list of minor actors in the school/movement is, but somehow compacting it (by formatting or otherwise) would be probably help the article. TheSlowLife (talk) 06:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title, maintenance
Talk:Omnibus progression

message: Why is this progression called "omnibus"? Hyacinth 16:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody knows that. The standard works on the topic don't say anything, or the origin is lost in rumours. --Mardhil 01:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Omnibus?

message: Tried to tidy up the chord notation, but would be better if somebody could add some proper analysis symbols. 88.104.83.141 (talk) 02:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidied

message: I'm not an expert so I don't know which is correct, but there is a disparity here that somebody should fix. --Kupopo (talk) 21:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I noticed the same thing. Is the picture missing Eb, or is the example in C major?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tc18021188 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text says C minor but graphic shows C major 

message: Omnibus progressions take two forms. The one listed in the long example at the top of the page is the less frequent version of the omnibus. A different version (which features a chromatic voice-exchange between the root and the third of a V7 chord) is more frequently used in compositions. In a few weeks, I'll try to add the appropriate information with sources. — Devin.chaloux (chat) 02:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing most common type
Talk:Rinky Dink (sound system)

message: Next time someone adds a deletion template to this article, can you please explain here why? I can't defend it properly until you tell me why you think it's non-notable. I believe this is notable - if you disagree, please tell me why, and I'll do my best to defend it. I would put a smiley face here, but that would look immature, so I'll just assure you that I'm smiling and sending the world my best wishes. Pittising 17:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: Not notable, not at all notable, and it hijacks "Rinky Dink" as a search term -- which has many other more notable uses. This post is self-aggrandized, promotional garbage. Typical wikiality.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.168.17 (talk) 22:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are indeed "many other more notable uses", these should have their own articles and/or should appear on a dab page. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: SPAM