Talk:Putting-out system

message: I have looked at the comments in which someone else proposed merges.  There are lots of assertions that they are different, but no further detail.  Please sign in, agree or disagree, provide detail why, and then sign your comment (4 tildas) Ehusman 03:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: :Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

message: Wikipedians must get over this mind-numbing practice of defining a word or term by referring to itself. Nickrz (talk) 17:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A cottage industry is an industry 

message: It doesn't tell the reader why the domestic system ended  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.238.214 (talk) 12:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not enough information 

message: Dr. Nakabayashi has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Nakabayashi has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : NAKABAYASHI, Masaki, 2013. "Honesty, Diligence, and Skill: Risk Sharing and Specialization in the Kiryu Silk Weaving Cluster, Japan," ISS Discussion Paper Series (series F) f166, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo, revised 03 Jun 2014.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 12:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Nakabayashi's comment on this article 

message: I added  link to freelancing and subcontracting, but i am genuinely not very clear on what the difference is, if there is one. Is this just an old term? I mean reading 
:::The merchant would "put-out" basic materials to the cottage workers, who then prepared the materials in their own homes and returned the finished merchandise back to the merchant.
i know several people who are freelancing, who work exactly like that. I know other people who work exactly like that, but they are not even freelancing, they are fixed employees. this article would benefit from someone knowledgeable in the historical subject giving some context as to where our current gig economy // freelance // work-at-home // etc world differs from this. was there a swing away from this during the IR and we are now swinging back? thank you.--91.64.37.246 (talk) 22:47, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary World - Difference to Freelancing??