lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Portal talk:Association football

message: I propose to merge Portal:Women's association football into Portal:Association football.
Reasons:
* It's the same sport, with the same rules. I see no point in dealing in different portals.
* The merge will be a simple process, the portals have the same sections, it will just be a content copy.
* Portal:Women's association football does not seem to meet WP:POG and may be nominated for exclusion.
Guilherme Burn (talk) 13:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Contrariwise , See, Portal:Association football/Selected biography not display any woman biography. The information from the Portal: Women's association football would be redirected in sequence without any loss of content. And I believe it's a matter of equality lists the stars of the feminine next to the masculine.Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:31, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  See also: Portal:English football and Portal:Football in Africa for a few more examples that are separate. If you want to add women to the Association Football portal, go forth. It's already ripe with English men's footballers, but of course could use an update. Hmlarson (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Per now, i did the redirects test with five biographies.. See Portal:Association football/Selected biographyGuilherme Burn (talk) 16:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Right.... Have you seen the recent page view metrics for the portals?  Hmlarson (talk) 17:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Soccer portals, that is? Hmlarson (talk) 17:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No. I don't understand. What's the point?Guilherme Burn (talk) 17:23, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The Reserves/U21/U23-teams are not youth teams. It's senior football. So you have to put them into Senior career. For example Mason_Greenwood, Callum Hudson-Odoi or Wayne Rooney (as you can see it's not a youth team). This games are Senior club appearances, so there is no reason to hide them or to put them into the youth career. --HSV1887 (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Games in Reserves/U21/U23 

message: It remains to be sorted out if the Player is to be called Spiegler or Shpigler. The latter would be afaik the yiddish emulation of the name, which is consistently used in the text. Oalexander (talk) 10:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mordechai Spiegler]] 

message: How does it make you feel Andrea yolis (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, article Talk is not a chat forum. David notMD (talk) 03:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bueatiful game of football
Talk:Anstey, Leicestershire

message: Surely worth a reference to Anstey Nomads on the Anstey page. 
86.135.136.121 09:48, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anstey Nomads 

message: Removed this section as it reads like a tourist guide, not a wikipedia article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.41.69.37 (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of shopping etc
Talk:Sven Aggesen

message: I am not a latinist, but the traditional latinization of Sven(d) is, I believe, Sveno, with Svenonis being the genitive. Is the form Svenonis Aggonis taken from a book title or somewhere else where one may expect the genitive to appear? Uppland 21:28, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Svenonis Aggonis is the name used in Gertz, "Scriptores Minores Historiæ Danice" (1917-1918), pretty much the de facto book on minor danish scripts (at least one of them). The book is in Latin. Twthmoses 16:45, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So presumably it is the Latin genitive form then? Could you quote the passage where the name occurrs to get the context? Uppland 17:19, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Svenonis sounds very much like a genitive of Sveno. If you google the name "sveno Aggonis" it appears to be the nominative form in Latin , and should consequently be used.--Wiglaf 08:58, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that's what I thought. Uppland 09:56, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well... then why is this article not under that name? --Palnatoke 10:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now. --Palnatoke 14:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The most correct name is probably Sven Aggesen" 

message: regum Dacie must be a slip. Are there two manuscript traditions, a Compendiosa and a Brevis History?--Wetman (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The titles Brevis historia regum Dacie (or Historia brevis regum Dacie) and Compendiosa regum Daniae historia refer to the same text. The latter is found in a seventeenth-century MS and I suspect that the first one, which is similar in meaning, is an editorial invention. Daci(a)e is perfectly fine. Although it originally referred to Dacia, in medieval Latin it had also come to describe Denmark. Cavila (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: regum Daniae
Talk:Eric Brill

message: Small note to 131.107.0.96 who kindly pointed to the current home-page: Eric, if that's you, who you also be as kind as to provide a photograph under a Free licence ? Thank you very much, I love your work ! :) Rama 21:34, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home page -> Photograph ? 

message: A quick google search shows many sites discussing Brills move from his poition as head of Microsofts adCentre to his post at ebay as vice president of research. The fact that the article has not been expanded for 20 months does not show that it is unexpandable. The move from Microsoft to ebay gained enough attention to assert notability so I went ahead and removed the tag proposing the article for deletion as it just needs more work. Weakopedia (talk) 12:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion 

message: "and was quoted in 2004 as predicting only brief success for Google's search engine business"
This is not in the citation as I read it.  He was saying that search in general, while not short of money, could end up being commoditized; and that Google's current document-centric approach was vulnerable to new, improved, Microsoft-wins-again vapourware. That second point was standard Microsoft rhetoric of the era, and it's not to Brill's credit that he regurgitated the party line. — MaxEnt 06:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in citation
Talk:Tin(II) chloride

message: According to episode 2.15 of House M.D., "When I was a kid, my dad was stationed at a marine base in Egypt. We were in the middle of nowhere and there was absolutely nothing for a kid to do except look for a mummy's tomb.... I never actually did find a mummy, but I did learn a fair amount about the ancient Egyptians. For example, they discovered that stannous chloride is not only great for toughening ruby glass, but if it's mixed with gold, it turns bright purple."  Any of this accurate? 139.84.48.249 15:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there's certainly some truth in it; from memory I think it may be used to make "Purple of Cassius" (see ).  We should probably look up some more authoritative sources on this and add it in.  It may be relevant to Gold(III) chloride as well. Walkerma 17:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I deleted the following text from the Uses section: "This very reaction between stannous chloride and gold was used in episode #215:Clueless of House to affirm gold poisoning.". The reference to that episode of House in the Popular Culture section is more than enough: it doesn't belong in Uses too. -- EmmetCaulfield (talk) 15:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, Stannous Chloride is in fact used as an indicator for gold and PGMs in aqueous solutions. Many hobbyists are using it. I added its use in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salut151 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: House MD

message: this article is being held on importance for the inclusion in the 0.7 test release. that hold nominations discussion link about leads to the wrong page; until it is fixed, here is the link instead. JoeSmack Talk 19:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be fixed. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 23:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: held nom
Talk:Walsingham

message: Well done,62.64.211.189, for your additions to the article. This is a fascinating subject.--File Éireann 21:57, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I didn't realise Walsingham had a market. When is it held?. -- Chris j wood 17:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done some googling, and the majority of references are to Walsingham as a village, not a town. For example the parish clerk, in maintining the parish council's website (as referenced on page), seems to be in no doubt that he is the clerk of a village, not a town. There is no evidence of a charter, or of the parish council claiming town council status. It seems the place did have a market, but no evidence this still survives. Amending article accordingly. -- Chris j wood 14:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Market town
Talk:Alexey

message: From what I understand, Alexis is not Slavic but greek in origin.  It may have been more popular in Russia, that does not make it Slavic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.132.242.1 (talk) 17:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I think it should be expanded with other countries roots. Because now it's looks like translation from Russian Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.134.65.191 (talk) 22:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tight Definition

message: What IPA is correct,  or  or  or some other?
:: There is not really 'correct' in these matters where people still quarrel about transliteration and transcription. Here, we see Alexis etc with an X while Russians in the English speaking world prefer to transcribe Ksenia, not Xenia. How the person wants it, that's 'correct'. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:B85F:E386:193E:DFE9 (talk) 00:16, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA
Talk:CSD

message: CSD can also mean Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion or :Category:Candidates for speedy deletion, but WP:CSD and :CAT:CSD work better.--Henrygb 22:20, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Consulting Services Department is most famous name in the Saudi Armaco Oil Company.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.36.32.136 (talk) 12:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSD
Talk:Antaphrodisiac

message: This article should be probably renamed and moved to "anaphrodisiac", and set "antaphrodisiac" to be a redirect. "Anaphrodisiac" is defined in more dictionaries, and also returns 10,700 google results instead of 717 for "antaphrodisiac". Note also, for instance, that the spelling without the T is used in the snopes article.--209.108.217.226 22:26, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Noone seems to disagree so I will do this. Alex.g 10:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Coronation Crown of George IV

message: A proper copyright free page on this crown has been added at the temp page. Whoever wrote the original page may well be a newbie who didn't know the copyright rules Wikipedia must obey. I don't think it was a deliberate copyright violation, but should be deleted nevertheless because of its clear breach of copyright. FearÉIREANN(talk) 22:30, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Quake II engine

message: This article is misleading, as id tech 2 seems to include both the Quake engine and the Quake 2 engine. Who is like God? (talk) 21:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also Quake 

message: People often confuse id Tech 1 for the engine used for Quake 1, which was actually id Tech 2. id Tech 1 is the engine used for Doom and Doom II. Accordingly, I'm getting rid of the section stating that half-life's goldsrc was not based on id Tech 2. It was.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.88.65.205 (talk) 23:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  id Tech 2 = Quake 1 & 2 

message: Hey everyone. Yesterday I updated the infobox to include more detailed information. I'll try to make the infobox information and detail consistent for the Quake and Quake 2 pages as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenjaminRose1991 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox updates 

message: IGNPSX: Are you using a brand new engine to create Quake II on the PlayStation, and if so, what are its strengths, and how will it make Quake II unique on the PlayStation?
Chris: For Quake II we're using a completely new engine.
Source: http://www.ign.com/articles/1998/12/31/the-real-quake-ii-interview  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.113.148 (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PlayStation
Talk:Ultimecia

message: I'm getting rid of original research that is on this Wikipedia article that shouldn't be. It is the cause of many disputes that will probably never end because neither side can be proved or disproved. However, I will be starting a Talk page about all kinds of Final Fantasy theories so it will appear there for analysis. -Eileen-
:Eileen, I'm restoring the text above, simply because other users probably don't like their comments blanked. I'd suggest continuing the discussion here. Regards, alphachimp. 20:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Mayfair (disambiguation)

message: I believe there's an English lifestyle magazine with this name that differs from the porn magazine mentioned in this article. It was in existence at least as far back as 1878. Praemonitus (talk) 02:38, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: But now the very real, and more recent, porn magazine seems to have been edited out entirely, which seems to be someone's rather prudish whim.  174.239.56.113 (talk) 18:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The Mayfair Magazine

message: With ,  reverted my addition of "(film)" as "unnecessary". However, the example "Harvey (film)" is given right at the top of MOS:DABPIPING so I believe it is necessary. I've made a later edit but let this be per WP:BRD. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 15:35, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguating phrase
Talk:Light pollution/to do

message: * It is inaccurate in "Measurement of light pollution and Global Effects" section to say that work by Cinzano et al. "measures" the sky glow by using DMSP observations - this discussion should be corrected to say that this work provides a crude estimate using a model, and only of the zenith.  For example, it uses sea-level atmospheric conditions everywhere, which cannot give accurate results in western US nor in aerosol-laden areas. Further, the photometric accuracy of the DMSP data has not been established and has been questioned in the refereed literature. Since someone else wrote this section, I will let them revise unless I am asked to do so. Cluginbuhl (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Majestic (video game)

message: The change from "All the messages were automated, which limited dialogue options" to "All the messages were automated, with limited dialogue options" -- was it made because the original text was perceived as a typo/grammatical error?  Or was the intent to modify the meaning? --Jay (Histrion) 00:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Should the 'developer' of this game really list Anim-X, given that we know it's a fictional company? Shouldn't it be EA, as stated on the Anim-X page itself? Melissa Della 09:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anim-X
Talk:Johnny Winter

message: I’ve always been curious as to why the First Winter album is not even mentioned as existing. My dad had the record. A Google search seems to indicate it was not widely printed and never in a format other than record. But can anyone shed light on this mystery? Alexandermoir (talk) 01:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: For a discussion of this topic, see Talk:Johnny Winter discography#FLC?. — Mudwater (Talk) 02:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Winter Album…why not included? 

message: Why is there no section on his personal life? 142.181.247.43 (talk) 19:41, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just started. But not much to say, it seems. 86.187.234.189 (talk) 21:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life? 

message: Type of guitar played??? 24.121.18.33 (talk) 07:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See Johnny Winter#Guitars and picking style. - DVdm (talk) 08:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of guitar?
Talk:Challenge riding

message: Hard to believe that Paris-Brest-Paris is not in the links list!
I'll have to come back when I have time and add it.
List of Challenge rides?  Where did this go?  Do we still maintain a list of Challenge Rides? Jamarks (talk) 11:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

message: I can't believe "century" redirects here. Doesn't it deserve its own article?
-- Do you mean a bicycle century, or the unit of time?--Popefelix 21:40, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Century??
Talk:Freetown Elementary School

message: See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Freetown Elementary School.
Although there clearly was no consensus to delete this article, it seems to have been deleted anyway.  Restored as an erroneous speedy.
Please submit to VfD again if desired. Obviously nobody has had a chance to work on this article for nearly a year because it was deletedm so perhaps it would be politic to wait a few months. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 00:46, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Very odd VfD
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Clockhouse Primary school

message: Firstly, Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. Secondly, I believe schools are encyclopedic. Lastly, Verifiable and NPOV articles can be written and Jimbo says Verifiable and NPOV are enough.
I don't always believe notability is a necessary factor for encyclopedic articles but I do believe that schools are important centres in a community, in children's lives, and in parents' and society's desire for improving. A news story I heard over and over today in Ontario is the release of Fraser Institute's annual "Report Card on Ontario's elementary schools" which ranks data on the 2850 schools.
People do have an interest in reading about schools, their history, their programmes, and their facilities. Obviously if people are interested enough to write a school article, if people are interested enough to start a schools project, and if many people are motivated to vote keep for schools, then some people are interested in having encyclopedic, neutral articles about schools. Wikipedia is, I suspect, the best place for these. School and board websites are not neutral and often too expansive for a brief encyclopedic read. Government websites and other "stat" websites: too uninteresting. "Rate-my-School" websites: too narrow, POV, and unverifiable. 
I agree with the proposals at WP:SCH and abide by them but I don't see any necessity to merge school-stubs and will vote keep for verifiable and NPOV school articles. In the future, when I say Verifiable and NPOV, please read it as I stated here. 
11111, on the other hand, had no information or hope for expansion, as I read the debate, beyond its non-prime attribute which it shares with most numbers. 
If I understand your reference to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Wikimedia In Memoriam 9/11 correctly, you wonder if I judge an article on whether anyone will look for that article. I don't. I know there are many articles on important things that I have no interest in and hope that there are some that the vast majority of people don't. The deciding factor is unfortunately the imprecise belief that it is "valid material for an encyclopedia". That's why we have human votes for deletion rather than beefstew-type calculations for deletion. 
I understand those who think non-notable schools are not encyclopedic but I respectfully disagree. 
Cheers, DoubleBlue (Talk) 00:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale
Talk:Tambour lace

message: Hello! In contribution to the article and related WikiProject Fashion (as noted above), I have added content relating to the history and origins of the tambour technique, and working as tambour lace through the late eighteenth to mid-nineteenth century in the west. Illustration with further image (re. early discussion of tambour technique application to heavier-weight cloths and garments), alongside references and links to other related Wikipedia articles. 
Many thanks! Diary of a Dress Historian (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of historical content to article
Talk:Calaverite

message: From the sulfide category heading: The Sulfide Class includes the Sulfides as well as the Selenides, the Tellurides, the Antimonides, the Arsenides, and the Sulfosalts. This follows the Dana classification system which includes several minor anion groups within the sulfide class. Vsmith 01:20, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Open-fields doctrine

message: Though interesting, this article looks like it was pulled wholesale from some other source. A quick Google shows another page with the same information (http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Open-fields-doctrine), but it appears to have gleaned its information from Wikipedia rather than vice versa. I'm hesitant to call this a copyvio problem since I see nothing it was taken from, but at the very least, it needs to be wikified. --Xanzzibar 01:21, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reasonable expectation of privacy test is one of the pillars of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.  It should be titled as its own article instead of being a redirect to open fields.  There are other areas outside of open fields where there isn't a REP, like with evidence found in public, trash, pen registers, aerial surveillance, field tests, canine sniffs, etc.--Whitenoise101 09:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Redirect 

message: This page is listed in the category 'Privacy of telecommunications.'  I don't really see how this relates to telecommunications.  I left the category in for now in case I just missed the connection but am suggesting it be removed.
--AndrewBuck 14:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Telecommunications

message: This article reads like soemthing written by a lawyer for another lawyer.  I'd take a hack at this but I think it really needs somebody with an understanding of the subject matter to express this for a more general audience. -- Whpq 21:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I believe the most logical and beneficial place to access this information is within the Fourth Amendment artical. Specifically, I suggest that "open fields doctrine" be redirected there so it can be viewed in the subsection on "Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for searches."  There, the open fields doctrine can be properly considered in context with other exceptions (e.g., the automobile and plain view exceptions) which would make understanding the concepts underlying the doctrine more accessible for everyone.  Of course, I am open to discussion about the redirect, please speak up if you don't think that is a good idea. Mr. schmitty 23:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  It's a subcategory of reasonable expectation of privacy, which itself is a subcategory of the Fourth Amendment. --Whitenoise101 02:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommendation for redirect to Fourth Amendment