Talk:List of rail transit stations in the Greater Manila Area

message: The image :Image:Srts logo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Srts logo.jpg

message: Hi it has come to my attention that most of the future lines like MRT-7 and extensions like LRT-1 SEP and MRT-2 EEP as well as the PNR extends or would extend to the Greater Manila Area.  So with that I propose to extend the coverage of the stations mentioned here to cover those that would fall already in the Greater Manila Area provinces such as Bulacan, Cavite, Rizal and Laguna to make the article more comprehensive. PhilippineRevolution (talk) 01:59, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand Coverage to [[Greater Manila Area]] 

message: Not all of the PNR stations opened on September 13, 1931
* Blumentritt and Santa Mesa stations were opened in December 22, 1905 as part of the Antipolo Line extension
* Vito Cruz, Buendia November 24, 1975
* Laon-Laan, Espana, EDSA (Magallanes) 1978
* Pandacan and Paco (including the Cavite line) March 25, 1908, the Paco station building was completed in 1915
* Pasay Road, Sucat, Alabang and Muntinlupa June 21, 1908
* Tutuban station was opened in March 24, 1891, the first railway service of the Manila-Dagupan line the section between Manila (Tutuban) and Bagbag in Calumpit, Bulacan. 
Stations from Muntinlupa to Calamba on 1909.
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.144.16.65 (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  PNR Stations 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of rail transit stations in the Greater Manila Area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060626132055/http://www.dotcmrt3.gov.ph/route%20map.htm to http://www.dotcmrt3.gov.ph/route%20map.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of rail transit stations in the Greater Manila Area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060517095541/http://www.lrta.gov.ph/system_map.htm to http://www.lrta.gov.ph/system_map.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Regarding Future Stations section
- Line 6 should be removed, due to cancellation of the project (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1W2n8tsqNhTTU-E5xBmf1WJQdoNMA5y2L/view)
-Line 9 (Metro Manila Subway) should be added to the section, as we now have a confirmed route and area approximation of stations Jpg0813 (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line 6 and Line 9 Future Stations 

message: In lieu of the discussion above, I would like to open a new consensus building topic regarding geographically near transfer stations:
Option A: Retain status quo (disambiguation)
Option B: Harmonize transfer stations from different lines regardless of name that is in proximity of a certain area into a single article. (e.g. Doroteo Jose station, Recto station, Lerma station -> Doroteo Jose/Recto/Lerma station), 
(e.g. Quezon Memorial station (Line 7) and Quezon Memorial station (Line 8) -> Quezon Memorial station)
To start off, I vote for Option B and assume  to be of the same vote.
Option A: 0 votes
Option B: 2 votes
Korean Rail Fan 08:39, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: * Yes, and just to add this is in line with the guidelines set out in WP:RAILSTATION where stations of different lines in more or less the same location should be treated as one and in one article. Tho i'd say we consider the other transfer stations with different names too.:/--RioHondo (talk) 09:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: *I can add that to Option B, but my suggestion would be should it be of different names, lower number station name goes first. (eg.EDSA/Taft Avenue station, Shaw Boulevard/EDSA station, Doroteo Jose/Recto/Lerma station)Korean Rail Fan 10:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sure, so that the older and more recognizable station is mentioned first, i see no problem in that. Although, again this should be between transfer stations only or those that are actually physically connected to each other via pedestrian bridge, underpass, overpass, including mall transfer stations, like araneta center and the north avenue mrt3 that will connect to north avenue grand central via trinoma. It actually is also very convenient as the station article titles would show the actual road intersection of these stations, which is how people really identify many of these stations like Edsa/Taft station, and seldom as plain Edsa only. Doroteo Jose/Recto station is perfect and very convenient as LRT2 will have at least 2 more stations there along Recto Avenue.--RioHondo (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

text: * Depends. Should be case by case. Same name stations in the same location (like the Quezon Memorial station and unlike the two Tandang Sora stations located in different neighborhoods) should be merged (e.g. City Hall station (Seoul)). But for your first example, I think retaining the three separate articles would be better. A good example of the latter is Meiji-jingumae Station and Harajuku Station, which are in very close proximity to each other.--Truflip99 (talk) 06:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of transfer stations