lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Freeserve

message: Was surprised to find that this page had been redirected to a page on Wanadoo when Freeserve existed as a recognised company and brand in the UK for six years. M0thr4 08:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for doing this. A separate article was requested long ago, but apparently nobody felt like writing it. --Zundark 09:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Freeserve/Wanadoo

message: Anyone remember when they first offered this? That 6pm-8am or 6pm-6am bollocks?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.45.139.85 (talk) 17:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Freeserve anytime

message: There is disagreement between this article and the Wanadoo article over the date on which Freeserve changed its name to Wanadoo. Maybe someone can find a reliable source to check which date is correct. --Zundark 09:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date disagreement
Talk:1633 (novel)

message: This novel is sorting quite bizarrely under some categories eg Literary collaborations -  it is listed at the end of the category under a curly bracket (brace). I can't quite work out why this is. Sterry2607 (talk) 22:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting 

message: The "Premise" is TOO fan-fiction. In fact the whole page is along with the other books! Strongly suggest of changing from "Premise" to "Plot" instead instead of advertisement.--Drgyen (talk) 00:16, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Premise

message: I looked up on Google and I found nothing about 1633 being on the "best selling list". I think the "best selling list" is more of an unsource exaggeration.--Drgyen (talk) 10:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Best Selling?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal/Proposed decision

message: 1) Punative administrative actions are to follow Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. While the decision to apply a block is up to the individual administrator, the action should not violate existing policy. Wikipedia:Ban#Decision_to_ban Administrators who grossly violate policy risk losing their privileges.
:Support:
:#Throwaway2 08:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Administrative privileges

message: 2) The decision to ban a user can arise from four places, the Wikipedia community, the Arbitration Committee, Jimbo Wales and the Wikimedia board of trustees. The decision can not arise from one individual administrator unless there is a community consensus behind the decision.
:Support:
:#Throwaway2 08:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Banning

message: 1)  and  indefinite block of  violated Wikipedia's blocking policy.
:Support:
:#Throwaway2 08:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrongful ban by SlimVirgin and JayJg

message: 2)  engaged in wheel warring when she reverted  reduction of the block to one week.
:Support:
:#Throwaway2 08:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Engaging in wheel warring

message: There's a missing word "is". But I don't wish to pass myself off as an arbitrator by making said change.
1) A user who grossly and repeatedly violates Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines may be banned indefinitely if there is a general community consensus that that there is little hope that they will ever edit productively Wikipedia:Ban#Decision to ban. The touchstone of an appropriate "ban by the community" is that there [IS] no administrator who after examining the matter is willing to lift or reduce the ban.
And there's a disconnect:
2) A user who engages in sustained aggressive biased editing may be banned from affected articles. In extreme cases from the entire site.
which should perhaps be:
2) A user who engages in sustained aggressive biased editing may be banned from affected articles, and in extreme cases from the entire site.
although that's just a matter of style of course...
TheGrappler 15:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genuine comment - there's a typo or two in the "proposed final decision"
Talk:No Angels (TV series)

message: Why are some names in speech marks? It doesn't need to say that 'Lia's daughter is called "Emma"' or that 'Emma's last name is "Costoya"'. They don't need to be in speech marks. They don't even need to be in quotation marks.
Also, it's not ironic that Gareth Miller now works behind the camera.
Fixed some time earlier,, cured poor spelling... 92.236.176.112 (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange punctuation/irony?
Talk:Truth-bearer

message: The text I have placed here is not my own. It comes from the article truth. Banno 08:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have been completely rewriting this article--Philogo (talk) 00:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I'm not sure 'essay' is the correct tag here but what I'm trying to indicate is that the article as it is currently is full of long discursive sections that would, perhaps, be appropriate in a textbook or monograph but not (I feel) in an article-- at the least they should be trimmed and made more succinct with references given to where the argument(s) are made at length in other primary sources. Perhaps that is the rewrite currently going on? (11/2010) BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 19:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Two Quotations added--Philogo (talk) 13:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  and another thing -- I'm queasy about the 'glossary' section -- that seems not on w/r/t/ an encyclopedia article, am I wrong? BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The glossary contents could be cast as footnotes to each occurence of the term definedPhilogo (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

text: Glossary replaced by notes--Philogo (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Essay tag

message: Would someone knowledgeable in the area be able to move the tangential "This raises the issue..."-type material into a separate set of sections on "Consequences"?211.30.171.128 (talk) 13:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you give an example of the tangential "This raises the issue..."-type material
— Philogos (talk)  17:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: On behalf of the general audience, I have replaced the misleading and confusing expression "just in case", with its correct, and easily understood equivalent, "if, and only if" (also, in more technical writing, "if and only if"). The following explains the error:
* Language Log: "Just in Case"
* Southern California Philosophy for philosophy graduate students: "Just in Case".Dr Lindsay B Yeates (talk) 21:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Just in case" 

message: The title has an unneeded hyphen, as do most of the defined terms, unlike the book that they are said to be from.  We should fix this.  And the book uses "token sentence", not "sentence token"; their implied meanings seem rather different.  Dicklyon (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article is moved, it should be moved to bearer of truth. Google Ngrams says so. Paradoctor (talk) 23:28, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the hyphens?
Talk:The End Complete

message: One thing I hear a lot is that this album is the top selling death metal album of all time ... Does anyone know of a source that confirms this?  The blabbermouth article from four years ago says that Morbid Angel's Covenant is #1, but apparently people dispute this.  Thedividingline 06:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Selling Death Metal Album? 

message: Any source to back up this claim? SwampZombieCult (talk) 22:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Selling Shirt in the History of Roadrunner Records?
Talk:Patent office

message: IMHO, this sentence is confusing:
:The entries shown in italics are regional offices which may only perform some stages of the patenting process - for example the EPO only performs the grant phase, not enforcement.
Many national patent offices are not involved in enforcement proceedings anyway, while national courts are competent. --Edcolins 08:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not "The entries shown in italics are regional or international patent offices."? The European Patent Office is in charge of the whole process of obtaining European patents.  --Edcolins 09:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italicized patent offices
Talk:Shipham

message: This article says "Shipham Hill is the highest point in the Mendips at 1066 feet", however Black Down, Somerset says "The summit of Black Down is Beacon Batch, the highest point of the Mendip Hills" and the Beacon Batch article claims 325 m (1068 ft) - this gives the impression that Shipham Hill is not the highest point. Can anyone verify?— Rod talk 08:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have modified the claim for Shipham Hill.  It would need some accurate surveying to rank these two hills.  JMcC 09:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the section on stock car racing needs to be rewritten in less emotive langauge more suitable for an encyclopedia. Although the mendip raceway should certainly be mentioned I don't understand "race "specials" to compete in full contact competition. The big-league formula has winged cars with 500+ horsepower V-8 motors, and the smaller F2 cars have 2-litre four-bangers, lightweight but hardy." - but I don't have the specialist knowledge to rewrite it. I would also be interested to know what makes it a "working man's sport" and "oft misunderstood" and see some references to support these assertions.— Rod talk 12:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stock car racing 
Talk:New Serbia (historical province)

message: This page needs some better English translation. A sentence such as
In the new home, Serbs founded many new places, which had same names as the places in their old motherland.
could read a number of ways. Insertion of articles (not used in most (?) slavic languages) would be nice.
::Is it ok like this: In the new home, Serbs established many new places, and gave to these places same names as the names of the places in their old motherland. ? PANONIAN (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roxanne Modafferi

message: This person is included on the aforementioned list. There is nothing in her bio about ninjutsu, though... Being on that list in company of clowns like Ashida Kim and Frank Dux could be seen as more of an insult than a compliment, and currently nothing indicates her having studied ninjutsu, so I would say either remove her from the list or add some info as to why she is there.85.157.155.247 (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Ninjutsu Practicioners 
Talk:Louisa Lawson

message: Everyone says that louisa lawson was just the first australian femenist. But she was more than that she was a mother. She gave birth to more than 1 son and her eldest was called henry lawson. But did they hate each other?
*She cut Henry out of her will, while leaving her small estate to other children of hers. But it's hard to know whether she hated him, or he her. I doubt that there is much evidence of that. Alpheus 20:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A discussion of louisa lawson 

message: The article says "For the women at the time universal suffrage was not the key issue, Lawson did not criticise the government for failing to give Indigenous Australians the vote." So what? She worked for women's suffrage. Saying she did not criticise anything not connected to women's suffrage seems very peculiar to me. And it is not referenced. Comments? Moriori (talk) 21:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the relevance?

message: A statue of Louisa was unveilled on 8th March 2023 by local sculptor Margot Stephens. https://louisalawson.org.au/ 49.195.38.72 (talk) 01:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louisa lawson statue, Mudgee
Talk:Volkswagen Fox

message: Notice that Suran is built in Argentina for all markets, not only local. Corrected.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.115.232.129 (talk) 21:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suran 

message: Seems strange to list all the other stats, but not the efficiency.  That should be added.  ----  192.136.15.133 (talk) 12:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the MPG or L/100km data? 

message: The author should update this article. For 2010, The Fox and Crossfox have received a facelift, the interior has been upgraded, and there are some minor changes in the platform and engine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.206.91.170 (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fox and Crossfox 2010 have changed 

message: Actually the VW Fox sold between 1987 and 1991 is related to the VW Voyage which in turn is brazil sedan version of the hatchback gol  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.39.75.225 (talk) 00:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: model confusion

message: The Vw Fox were sold as many things around the world for example like in RSA the Mk1 Jetta was available till 87" when the brought out the mk1 fox In RSA basicly a Mk1 jetta with a facelift... This was sold right up to 99" and the mk1 golf or "citi golf" sold right up to 2009 197.94.242.32 (talk) 13:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  VW Fox were originally produced on many different chassis around the world
Talk:Nissa

message: Nissa / Nissan = Santaclause in faroese
can also mean gnome or santas helpers. Little Elf or Little Ann
Nissa: A miniture Dashunds name or a persons name.
Nissa means women in arabic. Khair Al-Nisa means greatest of women. I have removed a sentence i believe to be incorrect in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.233.10.44 (talk) 16:20, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Multimedia software

message: If multimedia software should be its own category, it should be under Applications Software:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Application_software
Multimedia Software can be divided into 4 categories.
Presentation Software (Slide Shows, Animation and Video)
Desktop Publishing Software (More specifically print publishing)
Entertainment Software (Games and Shows)
Simulation Software (Virtual Reality and Virtual Objects)
: OK, will do. --Vossanova o< 17:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Juan Carlos Ferrero

message: he just made it to the semifinals of the 2007 monte carlo masters and los to federer 6-3, 6-4 (or 6-4, 6-3 i forget). someone should add this --128.122.88.68 22:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: monte carlo 2007

message: He's the current coach of Alexandra zverev Jr, (source: tennis.com) Gabzibs (talk) 06:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  coaching career 
Talk:Pro hac vice

message: I don’t have time for it right now, but someone should add mention of Philip J. Hirschkop who "Argued the cause for the appellants pro hac vice, by special leave of Court" in Loving v. Virginia[1]. Presumably, that’s a much more significant real‐life case than the one mentioned in the article.
Also, if the currently mentioned case stays in, the formal name of the case should be used instead of the roundabout description currently in place: “a lawsuit against the tobacco industry filed by Marsha F. and Richard Doolittle in New Jersey in 2002.” —Patrick Garies 02:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

message: An anonymous editor recently changed the pronunciation guide from "pro hack vee-chay" to "pro hack wee-chay", since the ancient Romans allegedly pronounced V as W. Be that as it may, I contend that the guide should reflect the modern English pronunciation, as we are dealing with a Latin phrase that has been incorporated with the English language.
I furthermore suggest that the syllabic denotation be replaced by the more conventional (and universal) symbols in the International Phonetic Alphabet.
IPA: [prəʊ hæk 'vi:tʃei]
Any objections?
/Jonte93 (talk) 18:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: In reference to "pay a small fee to the local bar association", and unsigned comment in the article asked:
:Would that be the same BA giving him the recommendation, or the foreign BA, the one that is "local" to the court he is appearing in?
That would be a fee to the bar of the court which the pro hac vice motion is before. Though the fee is not exclusively to the bar; the federal courts themselves may (and do) charge a filing fee, and presumably some state courts may as well. So I'm removing much of that text while adding fee examples. jhawkinson (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fees 

message: Fixed the wording after it listed the example of $200 fees paid to 'New York City federal court', which don't exist.  The City has within its boundaries federal district courts (Southern District located in Manhattan and Eastern District located in Brooklyn), which each have jurisdiction far outside the borders of New York City.  To say 'New York City federal courts' implies that New York City has its own federal courts, which is false. This is not the same as United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which does in fact hear cases only for the District of Columbia.  Grammarcop1 (talk) 17:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *I fixed this -- Notecardforfree (talk) 04:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New York City federal court" 

message: The "In Fiction" section doesn't seem particularly encylopedic. Does anyone want to make the case for keeping it? jhawkinson (talk) 03:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: jhawkinson (talk) 10:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Fiction
Talk:Taniela Tuiaki

message: Taniela Tuiaki is often used as a back row forward who moves out into the backs and vice-versa. I saw this on several times in the 2007 season. I did not add the fact that he played in the centres during pockets of last season, but I would say it was necessary to indicate on the infobox that he regularly plays in the second row. Londo06 (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regularly? On three out of thirty-three occasions he has started in the second-row. Four off the bench and the remainder on the wing. But undoubtedly, as always, you must be correct. ~ Florrie • talk • 11:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Within a game he would start on the wing and move into the seoond-row to give a back-rower a break. I remember him doing this to good effect against the Gold Coast, scoring in the corner after playing down the middle for the early sections. Londo06 17:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Rugby league positions#Second-row|Second-row]]
Talk:Jarrod Saffy

message: Is it time to ad a more up-to-date photo? Saffy has played four games at number 6 for the Melbourne Rebels. wcrosbie (talk), Melbourne, Australia 12:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated photo
Talk:Ankylosauria

message: Polacanthinae should redirect to Ankylosauridae, instead of this page. 75.203.191.158 (talk) 20:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'd like to see some information on that. Radishes (talk) 04:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: :
What's one foot high: their back or their belly? —Tamfang (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I don't give a damn cos they're stone dead already. —Tamfang (talk) 23:35, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

text: it originally said 1m, but was changed (with no explanation) back in Jan 2015. Neither the 1ft nor the 1m are cited. 2A00:23C5:C3A5:1301:7D84:F36A:6436:201F (talk) 03:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  one foot 

message: Shouldn't tails be mentioned in this article? 204.11.186.190 (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tails
Talk:Dry dam

message: I am not sure with terminology. Is it a good example of dry dam or bunding? --Snek01 10:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I still don't understand how these dams work. Is it walls on the side of river that only let a certain amount out? Seems like that would just make it flow faster? Is it a dam? But if it has no gates how would it be able to hold back more water during flooding? I just aint getting it. is it just a short levy on one side?   —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.221.182 (talk • contribs).
:I added an external link which should help.  The pictures in the gallery above don't appear to be dry dams. Malepheasant 22:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not sure I understand myself, but if there is a permenantly open hole at the base that the water normally flows through , and if you get a huge amount of rain then water slowly builds up behind the dam, and keeps pouring out of the hole at the base at a controlled rate, that would seem to make sense. EdwardLane (talk) 08:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Still don't understand
Talk:Thyreophora

message: On  I found Ankylosauromorpha which says it was name in 2001 by Carpenter. Can someone please verify this? Reid,iain james (talk) 01:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Should it be added to the article or not? Reid,iain james (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: According to , it seems to be a synonym of Ankylosauria under most common definitions. EDIT Actually, after further inspection, Ankylosauromorpha = Scelidonsaurus + random ankylosaurians > Stegosaurus. In Wiki's current consensus arrangement, Scelidosaurus is more basal than the ankylosaur/stegosaur split, which would make the clade Ankylosauromorpha empty (i.e. it is designed to "self destruct" or invalidate itself if Scelidosaurus is not a close relative of traditional ankylosaurs). So as it stands now, Ankylosauromorpha is not a valid clade. MMartyniuk (talk) 12:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ankylosauromorpha 

message: There is no reason to have Scelidosauridae separate from Thyreophora. The family does not have a clear phylogenetic definition, and in modern literature Scelidosaurus is considered a basal thyreophoran, with no reference to Scelidosauridae. Scelidosaurus, Emausaurus and Scutellosaurus are widely agreed to form a basal grade, not a monophyletic family. The other taxon considered to a Scelidosaurid, Bienosaurus is currently considered a nomen dubium. 1 Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless Scelidosauridae is a historically significant paraphyletic group (which, to my knowledge, it is not), I would favour a merge. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 20:15, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

text: I thought it was most appropriate here because Scelidosauridae was used primarily as a paraphyletic grouping to refer to basal thyreophorans, but I appreciate your logic. I am open to having it redirect there instead. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:14, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Redirecting to the classification section of Scelidosaurus seems reasonable to me as well. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 21:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: ,  With all three of us in agreement, can I go ahead and redirect Scelidosauridae to the classification section of Scelidosaurus? Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so, but we should wait a bit longer: According to Wikipedia:Merging, we should wait at least one week after the discussion was opened. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 18:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a good time now. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 03:15, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Scelidosauridae
Talk:Evo Terra

message: A ("") box on this talk page says, in part, that 
An individual [...] [logged in] as Evo_terra [...] [...]'s editing has included this article [...]
So the following remark (from 30 June 2006) should be seen as (probably) a response, or reply, to that box on this talk page. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to "Notable Wikipedian" tag 

message: The article, (as of the date/time of this talk page entry), contains a link to 
http://gangplankstudios.com/ 
but, that page contains information that amounts to, recommending that the (human) reader do a [manual] re-direct to a new URL, namely 
http://gangplankhq.com/studio/ 
So I intend to make an update to the article to "bypass" that indirect referencing, and point directly to the new URL.  Any comments?  here, or on my talk page.  Any objections?  If they are serious, then there is the possibility of a "revert".  But this strikes me as a no-brainer, so I intend to "be bold".  Just FYI,  --Mike Schwartz (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  outdated hyper link to be updated