Talk:T'au Empire/Archive 2

message: Below this heading, please. -- Saberwyn 12:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: You sacrificed your user page for the proposed revised article? Whatever works I suppose. Wait, I am confused... Colonel Marksman 14:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Your User Page

message: The physiology looks good, but we could also use a picture too ;D Colonel Marksman 14:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Physiology

message: I took a look at the history of that and I just now figured out... you're trying to bloody write this thing all by yourself! It's not a bad thing... just a load of effort. You did everything I was planning on doing. Colonel Marksman 14:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Weapons, Equipment, Vehicles

message: I made a few minor changes in there and the rest looks very good! I want to specially congradulate you on the indication that Tau warfare revolves around the "hunt", NOT long-range warfare.
I want to personally say this, to anyone who plays against or with Tau and I will tell this to you. When I used Tau against Dark Eldar, after easily killing off the lords and close combat specialist speed-freak units, I slaughtered the Dark Eldar in close combat! I was appauled and I discovered why: 1. Gun/Shield Drones. 2. Armor saves. People also tend to overlook the Tau's regular ballistic skill of 3. If the Tau were all about ranged-warfare, it should be hirer.
In my experience as a Tau commander, if my opponent focuses solely on my long range, he's dead meat in my cadre's hunt. Colonel Marksman 14:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Changes

message: We didn't include anything about Gun Drones. Colonel Marksman 14:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gun Drones

message: Is setting these articles out in the divisions of "fiction" and "reality" the way of the future? -- Saberwyn 10:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it, think it works, and think it produces a good encyclopedic article. Apologies for the belated reply. Cheers --Pak21 10:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An important question? 

message: *Good job on refraining from jargon! Colonel Marksman 14:47, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra comment

message: User:Saberwyn/Saberwyn's Tau Article → Tau (Warhammer 40,000) … Rationale: Significant rewrite of the 40K Tau article. Rewrite has support of several members of the Warhammer 40,000 wikiproject. I'd do a cut-n-paste move and leave the rewrite page as a redirect, but others have contributed to the rewrite.… -- Saberwyn 11:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support: much better than the current article --Pak21 19:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Of course. Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 18:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support: much better than the current article --Pak21 19:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course. Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 18:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey