lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dropped-ball

message: For the discussion on the proposed merger please see here
Lucy-marie (talk) 00:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Laws of the game, given since June 1st, 2016, say that the Referee should not determine who has to take part or to play the ball at first (besides all that, that in any case all players, maybe 22, could take part). This clarifications may be seen first in context with dropped balls after injuries. The number of dropped balls due to injuries raised or increased in the last years (other fair plays – ball is shot out of the field of play – are recorded since 1992), and it was a matter of course that the team that was involved with the injury could take the ball. The manner of the referees was equal but at last it led to a clash which implied that they would help one of the 2 teams so it seemed that they were not impartial. According to the latest laws, referees now invites one player (or more) of each team to take part. According to those concessions, in the main-parts the procedure occures like before but that's a different kettle of fish...
Another change of the laws says that up to now two players had to touch the ball after correct re-start in order to score a goal. It may be that this change is a late answer to unfair actions or to avoid unwanted goals (perhaps own goals). Regarding unfairness there was a player named Luiz Adriano who played for Shakhtar Donetsk: On November 20th, 2012, in the Champions League away match versus FC Nordsjælland (Danmark), he pounced into a pass intended to return the ball to the Danish team by his team mate Willian - after a dropped ball. One Danish player was injured, Danish team led 1-0. Adriano rounded the Nordsjaelland goalkeeper and finished into an empty net. Referee Antony Gautier from France had no other opportunity as to allow the goal. The match finished with a 5-2-victory for Donetzk. The UEFA banned Adriano - for his being unfair - with one match.   --213.225.15.186 (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some notes 
Talk:Extra time

message: Why is extra time sometimes abbreviated "aet"? Where does the "a" come from? -Phoenixrod 16:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: after extra time! Paulbrock 20:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Abbreviation

message: In the opening scenes of the 2006 film The Pink Panther, the French soccer coach Yves Gluant was murdered during a match between the French and Chinese national teams.  Note that the description as spoken by the narrator uses the North American sports term "sudden death" and "tied" rather than the correct terminologies "extra time" and "draw" respectively.  Should this be added as trivia here, or it is too irrelevant? --JNZ (talk) 11:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hint: if you call it "trivia" it's too irrelevant. See also WP:TRIVIA and links. jnestorius(talk) 22:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of Extra Time in Pink Panthers 

message: Thanks. 67.243.7.245 (talk) 20:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much time between the extra halves? 

message: This page has been merged and redirected per Talk:Overtime (sports)#Merger proposal. Zzyzx11 (talk) 21:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 
Talk:Fifth official

message: As far as I can tell, I think the 5th official was only used in the world cup and nowhere else. Any sources for/against this? LukeSurl t c 08:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Traditionally, in an emergency, the fourth official would take over the duties of the referee or an assistant referee if one of them became injured, with the injured official then taking up the fourth official duties (substitutions, control of dugouts, etc.). However, with the introduction of the fifth official in 2006, where allocated they were given the sole reponsibilities of assisting the fourth official and replacing only the assistant referee if one became injured. The fourth official continued to be the referee's replacement if needed. Ref (chew)(do) 14:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only World Cup 

message: Hi. Please discuss the proposed merger of Assistant referee, Fourth official and Fifth official here. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 01:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger of assistant officials articles
Talk:Goal kick

message: "this is punishable by an indirect free kick to the defending team from where the offence occurred".  Punishing the defending team by giving them a free kick?  Surely wrong somewhere. Mark 00:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infringements 

message: A kick at goal in either codes can also be called a goal kick. Might want to include a note or a redirect in the article.Londo06 12:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Also Rugby of both codes

message: For the discussion on the proposed merger please see here
Lucy-marie (talk) 00:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Why does "Law 18" redirect to the Goal Kick page?  Law 18 is code for common sense and has little to do with goal kicks.
Gameking3002 (talk) 04:44, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Law 18 redirect

message: Under "Procedure", the article currently states "A goal can not be scored directly from a goal kick against the opposing team. An own goal cannot be scored from a goal kick; in the highly unlikely circumstance that the ball happened to land directly into the kicker's own goal a corner kick would be awarded to the opposing team."
The first part is clearly wrong.  Law 16 on the FIFA website states "A goal may be scored directly from a goal kick, but only against the opposing team."  So you can score against the opponent, but not against yourself (ie, an own goal won't be allowed).  I've made the correction.
Rainjar (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoring directly from goal kick 

message: Goalkicks must not be created at the end of the first half or at the end of the match. --213.225.0.173 (talk) 20:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halftime or end of the match
Talk:Kick-off (association football)

message: Match begins when the Referee blows maybe accurate regarding time begins to run, correct begin of the match is when the kick-off is done (ball has to move considerably). Even there maybe only not a second elaps between Referee's whistling and the well-done kick-off - but it may occure that the kick-off is delayed by unexpected circumstances (kick taker or another player of any team corrects his equipment a.s.o.). At the same time (or simultaneously with the Referee's whistle) could occure a misconduct or an infringement (or misconduct or infringement is/are reason for the delay): However, when an infringement or misconduct happen before the kick-off is done in a correct matter, the Referee has to caution the player/s. If there a player (or more) is (are) dismissed, he (they) could be substituted. This means that both teams can start with 11 players, and both teams can use the maximum of substitutes. The only restriction is that a team isn't allowed to change the number of substitutes (in the most parts there the maximum of substitutes are five players; if one player is sent off there are remains four a.s.o.). But if the kick-off was done, there a team (or both) has (have) to play in minority.
     
In the past, very often kick-offs were made in a manner that one player kicked the ball a little towards and then a team-mate kicked it back. Since now laws of game allowing to kick into all directions you can see nearly only the method of kicking back. I think teams would have more advantage by kicks forwards (maybe such actions have to be trained). Theoretically, a goalkeeper may take the kick-off (like he is allowed to do in all cases of re-starts). If a kick-off moves into the own goal without being touched by an other player a corner-kick is to award to the opponent team (maybe theoretical too). If you like fictions there could a second touch only be punished with an indirect free kick if (after goalkeeper's creating the kick-off) the goalkeeper would fetch the ball with his hands in his penalty area...
::But it is no fiction that the Referee has no need to allow a kick-off when there is half-time or end of the match. 
213.225.34.96 (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some notes
Talk:Stand by

message: Is suspend a Windows-specific feature? The definition at the beginning is nonsense.
Pavlix 18:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is ACPI G1 Sleeping state and Windows OS calls it "Stand by". Changed description to "Stand by is a feature of computer operating system that allows to switch computer to ACPI G1 Sleeping S3 state. Stand by term is usually used in Microsoft Windows OS ...". (88.118.71.36 15:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  why only Microsoft Windows?
Talk:Furtwängler Glacier

message: Regarding http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Furtw%C3%A4ngler_Glacier&diff=101609908&oldid=101516931, I really don't understand why one would speak of "glacial ice". Check the etymology of "glacial", and explain how ice can be non-glacial, please. 91.64.28.149 16:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You have a point that it could be read as "ice ice", a redundancy (first definition ), but I think a reader of this article would understand the meaning to be "ice contained within glaciers and ice fields", as opposed to that contained in snow cover and permafrost. It is used this way in the headline of the first reference. In the second reference, it seems clear that this adjective refers to glaciers and not ice generally. I'm inclined to retain the current wording and risk redundancy rather than clarity. The circumlocution "ice in glaciers and ice fields" seems unwarranted, in my opinion, but I'm happy to hear the thoughts of my fellow editors. Thanks for bringing it up. Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation, please?

message: I'd be interested in why that glacier is named the way it is. The name does not really sound like Swahili ;) Anyone able to include that information? Gulliveig 06:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added where the name came from to the text.--MONGO 06:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Dramatistic pentad

message: I'd like to add a link to my article, cited in this entry, about the 5 w's, but I may have bollixed up the edit. In any event, here's the link text I tried to enter:
"The Five Ws of Online Help Systems" by Geoff Hart, TECHWR-L. Retrieved April 30, 2012.
Not sure if the date should be updated to today or left as the author's original cited date. Please feel free to fix the problem without consulting me... I'm still new at this.
--Geoff  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geoffhart1962 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding direct link to the cited article
Talk:Owen Barfield

message: Betjeman? Why is this relevant? Charles Matthews 14:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Betjeman?

message: I'm currently trying to focus on Barfield's Saving the Appearances: A Study in Idolatry, which I find to be his most important work. I am planning to do a chapter by chapter analysis, or at least summary, that would allow for a greater understanding of this work. I would appreciate any input or feedback from those who have read Barfield.
Further, I agree that the biography is a bit sketchy in places, and it needs much more work, but I have little knowledge in this area. Devon --Dlb012 (talk) 20:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chapter analysis of ''Saving the Appearances''

message: What's the best way to order the information? I happen to be most interested in Barfield's book Saving the Appearances, so I have put that before some biographical information, but perhaps this has been unwise. Devon --Dlb012 (talk) 22:56, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordering the information?

message: All of this highly-detailed information about Saving the Appearances should be in a separate article.  The current article should stick to his life, with a summary of his writing. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 23:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes a lot of sense. I'll work on that. Devon --Dlb012 (talk) 15:54, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saving the Appearances 

message: The article says he was a solicitor. Should that be included under occupation/profession in the first sentence and in the sidebar template? Mdmcginn (talk) 19:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solicitor?
Talk:Yakuza 2

message: Does anyone know if this game will be released in the EU (possibly as "Yakuza 2")? 194.109.22.149 13:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EU release 

message: PAL and NTSC versions of the game come in a single DL DVD, unlike the Japanese one, which contains 2 normal DVDs. This should be noted to avoid unnecessary arguments with stores that sell opened games (i.e. GameStop). NeoSquall86 (talk) 08:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western versions package 
Talk:Razorback (character)

message: Very little info on this guy out there...Scrapper 14:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Very little

message: Tried to clarify that first full appearance is PPSSM #13.  His shadow appears in the very last panel of the last page of issue #12.  Maybe I'm wrong but a shadow (with no dialogue no less) shouldn't consititute a character's first appearance.
Ce2421 (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First full appearance
Talk:History of K-1

message: I've done a first cleanup sweep of much of the article, removing NPOV, peacock terms, non-encyclopedic phrases etc. Also wikilinked all the names (I think). But more needs doing; and I'll let someone else decide how much detail should actually be in here. --Smalljim 17:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: @mrhassanmeo MrHassanMeo (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Hassan Meo  

message: Wikipedia is not a blog, nor is it the place for "retrospectives" and glorified YouTube video scripts. All articles must be written in a non-neutral, unbiased tone with proper citations. Any unsourced material should be removed. No exceptions. Thecleanerand (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs a COMPLETE AND TOTAL rewrite.
Talk:Brisson, Ontario

message: According to StatsCan, this is indeed a community (see this). There's no reason for an editorial spiel about why this is or isn't its own community. Mindmatrix 14:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article Felton, Ontario does have an "editorial spiel" similar to the one that was here. If you are against such things, why don't you check out that article? --FreshFruitsRule 15:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/"Writers On The Loose"

message: Bold textBUDJENKS":  A very disturbed "writer" on this website; jealous, raging, bipolar maybe, litiginous, scary scary scary.  Tries very hard to convince that it is others who are mentally disabled when in truth it is she who is.  BEWARE! Cacaphony 14:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Calico Jack

message: I have found several websites claiming Jack Rackham had a stint up in Lake Michigan, where he was known to steal everything from "tackle boxes to boats." Due to the nature of the sources I find this dubious, but I also think that his status as a sort of local legend would be an appropriate addition to this article. (The sources in question: , , and .) Cynthia-Coriníon (talk) 09:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Jack and Lake Michigan?

message: This article claims that the skull and crossbones flag likely dates back to the early 20th century, but the actual Wikipedia article on Jolly Rogers claims they were used throughout the 1700s. Abelhawk (talk) 19:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Abelhawk The article is talking about Rackham's (supposed) own personal Jolly Roger flag - white skull above crossed white swords on a black background - not about Jolly Rogers in general. The flag that is popularly attributed to Rackham is a modern invention dating to the 1950s. TheLastBrunnenG (talk) 00:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jolly Roger date/authenticity 

message: This section is a mess. The first paragraph mentions he capture the Kingston, then the second says he received a pardon, followed by the third paragraph stating he captured the Kingston. So did he capture the Kingston twice, or were there two ships both named "Kingston", or what? On top of that, the dates are all over the place and don't make sense. Paragraph two says he went to obtain a pardon in 1719. It is immediately followed by stating he captured the Kingston in December, which resulted in bounty hunters nearly capturing him in February 1719. Either the year of the pardon is wrong, the year of the near capture is wrong, or for some inexplicable reason the section is not in chronological order and is jumping back and forth between events. 2600:1700:B280:B1C0:ADFC:209C:3C4D:E764 (talk) 11:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain Rackham section 

message: Removing the 26 December 1682 birth date and England as place of birth. Rackham's birth date is not mentioned in his trial documents or other articles or letters from the period. This date seems to be a confused modern addition. Different modern sources like Peter Lehr's book "Pirates" and websites like "Legends of America" repeat the 26 December 1682 date but they don't say where they got that info. Editing out the date until we can find a primary source or period source that documents this date. If people keep restoring it and only linking to books or sites that don't cite their sources, then at least I can add a warning about the uncertainty of the date. TheLastBrunnenG (talk) 02:51, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date and place of birth
Talk:Şemdinli

message: == Merge from Shamizdin ==
Şemdinli and Shamizdin appear to deal with the same district, and should in my opinion therefore be merged. --Benne ['bɛnə] (talk) 14:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Şemdinli and Shamizdin appear to deal with the same district, and should in my opinion therefore be merged. --Benne ['bɛnə] (talk) 14:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Shamizdin]]
Talk:Kay Hammond

message: The IMDb lists this London born Kay Hammond (I) and a Kansas City born Kay Hammond (II) (* 1901). According to the IMDb, Number II was Mary Todd Lincoln in D.W. Griffith's Abraham Lincoln. According to Katz' Film Encyclopedia, the part was played by Number I. So, what is right? Khero 14:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1930 Abraham Lincoln Pressbook states of the actress who plays Mary Todd "was born in Springfield, Mo. Her mother was a Southerner, and her father a staunch Unionist...".  Thus, not likely to be the London-born actress of this article. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who played the First Lady?
Talk:Shelter (band)

message: the link for Mantra is definitely not Shelter's album.
There really is no page for it either. This is kind of a 
neglected article. CharlieP216
The "years active" infobox shows Shelter starting in 1991, but the release date on the No Compromise 7-inch indicates they were active at least as early as 1990. Furthermore, in the Hold Steady song "Barely Breathing," the lyrics suggest the singer saw Shelter live in 1989 at the 7th Street Entry in Minneapolis. I'm suggesting years active should begin with at least 1990, if not 1989.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.146.155.193 (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The band seems to have split in 2006 https://iskconnews.org/influential-krishnacore-band-shelter-reunite-for-us-and-european-shows,6545/?fbclid=IwAR1gB6BhcNWIvWhXW5uOt31kF4fLuvdIuJgL4q0SliEs4KJdELGIjHjKJLs and just reformed for a few months during 2018 for some gigs.
There is another band Shelter now, in UK https://www.shelterofficial.com/, who don't yet have a page, but the title of this one would usefully pave the way for this to be created, e.g. Shelter (US band)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by O87r34tr813 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Stevenson screen

message: Reorganized the page to better fit Wikipedia standards.  If this page had references, it would easily meet start class. Thegreatdr 18:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganization

message: It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim. As of 7/16/2009, the surfacestations.org project has surveyed 1003 of the 1221 US stations, and the data has been further checked for accuracy. Over 90% of the stations are not in compliance in at least one area, while over 60% are badly out of spec. The worst sites are around 8%. The USHCN in its current condition is a demonstration of how not to measure temperature. http://wattsupwiththat.com/category/weather_stations/ There has been an attempt to discredit (Menne et al 2010) the surfacestations project using an early data set from when only 43% of the stations had been surveyed and had yet to cover most of the rural sites, where compliance with siting guidelines tends to be better.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 11:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: surfacestations.org

message: Even large installations and important stations have been switching from hand acquired data to automatic weather stations. I couldn't find anything in wikipedia about the nomenclature of their components, but  I found this Plate Gill Radiation Shield which to me seems to be the modern equivalent of the old stevenson screen. Since I don't know if this is indeed the correct name I'll leave it to the experts to incorporate something along those lines into the article. --BjKa (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Equivalent 

message: Autochthony writes.  Does anyone have a first date [year, even] for the use (occasional or widespread) of a Stevenson screen?  Autochthony asked - 2012 09 21 2257 Z 109.154.21.249 (talk) 22:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stevenson Screen
Talk:North Seymour Island

message: Not sure where this idea of the name comes from. Online I can find this:
http://www.galapagos.to/NOTES-1.HTM#Edwardes
Which says they are presumably named after Sir George Francis Seymour (1787-1870), who commanded the Pacific Station in the mid-19th century.
Kert01 14:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of island's name

message: a nice infobox could be added, based on this one  FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox
Talk:Pesaro

message: Former german cancelor Gerhard Schröder was several times in Pesaro on vacacion!--Stone 14:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivial

message: An ocean liner named the Pesaro traveled between Genova and New York City during, at the least, the early 20th century.  Other city articles with ships named after cities have mention of the relationship.  Might anyone have any additional information on this ship which might at least provide a stub's worth of info? --Thisisbossi 22:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pesaro (Ship)
Talk:I Monster

message: Actually, the song featured on episode 1.3 of Hustle, not 1.2 as stated in the article.
Agreguen este album: People Soup (2013) http://imonster.bandcamp.com/album/i-monster-presents-people-soup  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.84.230.242 (talk) 23:20, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled