Talk:Lorwyn

message: The first announcement for Lorwyn (peanut) appeared on Arcana today, time to give it a wiki-page :) (Chakothee 10:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

message: What about the speculation about this being a four-set block?
--Rubbaducky42 20:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with Rubbaducky42 on this one. I think it's a 4-set block. I mean, come on? Why would a duck lie to a person? The Ronin 22:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four-set block 

message: Can anyone give a source for the comment on it being a mirrodin altered by the rifts? I can't find any quotes or references anywhere.
72.240.214.72 16:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't any.  It should be removed. ImbolcNight 13:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=magic/planeswalkers/week1
 "the effects of these rifts spread beyond Dominaria, affecting other planes in unexpected ways:
    * On Mirrodin, the plane's mana core destabilized and discharged five separate orbs of mana"
Sirconnorstack 13:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: mirrodin

message: Since all the standards/regulations/conforming that WP has built up inclines me not to edit pages, I'll leave it to others to include this new info.
In ( http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgcom/daily/af171 ) right before the poll, it's announced Lorwyn will have a new "keyword action". Old keyword actions include: Attach, Counter, Regenerate, Sacrifice, Tap. These are some pretty fundamental components to the game.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.233.254.213 (talk • contribs) date|16:48, May 18, 2007 (UTC)}}
:Done.  Thanks for the great spot, 69.233.254.213. --Lifebaka 21:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  set contents 

message: Am I the only one who upon first seeing the expansion symbol thought "elf ear" rather than "leaf"? Is this worth mentioning or am I just odd?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.24.17.198 (talk • contribs) 
:I can see it, but it might be worth waiting until MTG.com begins showing preview cards, or we otherwise get a better sense of what sort of world Lorwyn is.  I lean towards leaf, as an elf ear would not be as desciptive a symbol for a set.  Of course, if you feel it is notable enough, go ahead and add it. --Lifebaka 00:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  expansion symbol 

message: There is way too much detail in that section.  We don't need to re-post, in full, the entire set of new rules for Planeswalker cards.  Mentioning that the rules have been released and linking to them would be enough.  I have taken the liberty of making this edit. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lorwyn#Planeswalker|Planeswalkers Section]] 

message: 206.173.169.131, you have recently been hindering efforts that Temporarily Insane has been making to purge from this article content that is either speculative in nature or is unsourced, often both.  WP:CITE and WP:NOT#CBALL discourage these practices, and it is therefore in line with Wikipedia's policy to have such edits removed.  Please desist such unproductive edits, so that Temporarily Insane may keep this article in line with policy. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the mtgsalvation link, as you haven't really given any good reasons to keep it.  However, I have readded the comment that InQuest published the full spoiler. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

text: MTGSalvation is not a proper source.  If you can find the INQuest or Scrye articles online then that would be an acceptable source for this article. --DBishop1984 16:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Citing Sources and Speculation 

message: The site magicdeckvortex.com is simply copying from mtgsalvation. mtgsalvation is not a good source as it is based on leaks and is therefore speculative (not to mention the majority of it is a forum, which is not acceptable as per WP:RS). magicdeckvortex is citing mtgsalvation, and so we cannot include that either. Scrye is valid, as it is a published magazine that has permission to print those card images. Hence, I am removing items sourced to magicdeckvortex or mtgsalvation, but not Scrye or Wizards. If you object, please state your reasons. Thank you. --Temporarily Insane (talk) 20:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the mtgsalvation link, as you haven't really given any good reasons to keep it.  However, I have readded the comment that InQuest published the full spoiler. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

text: MTGSalvation is not a proper source.  If you can find the INQuest or Scrye articles online then that would be an acceptable source for this article. --DBishop1984 16:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasoning 

message: Is "Clash" not a new mechanic as well?  (players reveal the top card of their library with the highest converted mana cost "winning" the clash and potentially having additional card casting effects?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.216.185.99 (talk) 20:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not confirmed yet by a reliable source. (Leaks/mtgsalvation are not reliable sources.) --Temporarily Insane (talk) 22:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I could have sworn there was an official preview card with Clash on it... android79 22:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, guess not. android79 22:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

text: There was, Lash Out during the Japanese Nationals coverage of mtg.com. I guess it's somewhere in the Tournament center. 84.177.166.253 12:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Link - . It's called a blog, but it's really more of a permanent site feature. 84.177.166.253 12:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clash Mechanic 

message: Looks like the art shown here is the one for the prerelease promo card.  Note the date in the lower right hand corner of the art box. --DBishop1984 12:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wren's Run Packmaster

message: A nomination can be found here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 February 16#Category:Magic: The Gathering blocks to merge Magic categories back to blocks from sets. Feel free to join in on the discussion. Leitmotiv (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic categories to be merged back to block structure discussion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lorwyn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921060301/http://www.plaingames.com/games/reviews/review.asp?id=293 to http://www.plaingames.com/games/reviews/review.asp?id=293
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified