Talk:Dotmusic

message: I'm sure you have your reasons for hating Moopy, but frankly, the dot-lite part of Dotmusic was the busiest part of the former Dot forums, and as Moopy is something of a successor to this part of the Dot forums, I thought it appropriate they should be top of the list.
Besides, why are you arguing over the order the names are on the list? ChartClarity doesn't belong on this list, as it is NOT a Dotmusic offshoot.
ChartClarity is NOT the only place to find chart positions 41-80, and I wouldnt brag too loudly about the midweeks that all these sites get as often as you.
If you are so self-important that you are so enraged by not having a link on a barely-seen Wikipedia page, then by all means, start your own page.
Diddy
Can I just add, I'm nothing to do with Moopy, I'm the admin for Chart Refugees. This is a really pointless argument, I don't understand why you want to tack your name onto this list. The Coolclarity Admin (name?) said a few weeks ago when CC closed that it was never a Dotmusic off-shoot, which we all knew to be the truth from the start. My advice is to do another ChartClarity entry, you have as much right to representation or whatever it is you are looking for on Wikipedia, but this is not the place.
Diddy.
I'm not saying it's fair .. isn't there something to protect against this sort of thing on Wikipedia?  Diddy
:Dotmusic is notable as one of the first major music-based internet sites; the fact that it has spawned so many offshoots actually adds to its notability - had its members just folded up and disappeared, things may have been different. However, to have separate entries for each of these would be unneccesary unless you could show that the sites had become notable in their own right - neither the (unauthorised?) archiving of copyrighted chart information nor Moopy's notoriously gladiatorial atmosphere achieves this. Ac@osr 17:12, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The notability of the subject is currently unclear, since no sources are cited. By the notability criteria for web content, multiple independent reliable sources are required to make sure that this web site is notable. These sources might be independent review, press articles or books, for example, which cover the web site in detail. Please cite such sources in the article in order to avoid deletion.
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 07:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dotmusic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724150910/http://www.webuser.co.uk/products/Dotmusic_on_Demand_review_1626-212.html to http://www.webuser.co.uk/products/Dotmusic_on_Demand_review_1626-212.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified