Talk:British naval forces in the Falklands War

message: There are several omissions in this articles and also a big mistake such pointing Mirage III in air strikes when in fact were IAI Daggers. The MB339 strikes are also missing. Jor70 14:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The IAI Dagger and the Mirage III are two versions of the same plane - the dagger being a mirage produced under licence in isreal.  As such they are easily misidentified and it will require more evidence than a single website to warrent a change - especially as the Argentinian airforce have repeatedly reffered to them as Mirage III's 94.168.48.161 (talk) 17:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

text: mirages and daggers look identical when bombing you - they are the same plane built by different manufacturers..... 94.168.48.161 (talk) 17:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Daggers (IAI Neshers) were Israeli Mirage 5, derived from the Mirage III. --Regards, Necessary Evil (talk) 22:50, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Please make any changes you see fit. The list is not complete, and not fully annotated, your additions are welcome. Megapixie 17:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

text: According to "Sir Lawrence Freedman:The Official History of the Falklands Campaign, 2005" it was St. Edmunds with an S, what is your source? Necessary Evil 09:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The Sealink site is reference enough, the twogreens link is an interesting link, but not a proper reference for St. Edmund without an 'S'. When you change St. Edmunds to St. Edmund in the article, please put http://www.simplonpc.co.uk/BR8_Harwich.html#anchor1481876 right after St. Edmund. Be bold! Necessary Evil 17:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article not accurate 

message: Note: I mentioned this RFC at Talk:HMS Conqueror (S48). Pfainuk talk 12:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I absolutely agree, an impossible standard is being set and a reasonable justification for its retention is simply being ignored.  Justin talk 12:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the objections here, the appropriate forum for continuing the discussion will be WP:IFD. I'll nominate it later. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the [[:Image:HMS Conqueror (S48).jpg]] be removed from this article, and the [[:HMS Conqueror (S48)]] article? 

message: An image used in this article, File:HMS Bristol storing at Ascension Island 1982.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:HMS Bristol storing at Ascension Island 1982.JPG)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:HMS Bristol storing at Ascension Island 1982.JPG Nominated for Deletion