Talk:Trent Dilfer

message: is this article too big to be considered a stub?--Alhutch 23:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: Since Matt Hasslebeck started at QB before Trent Dilfer did, Matt isn't after Trent in the list of Seahawk starting QBs. Correct is either Hasslebeck-Dilfer-Hasslebeck or Kitna-Hasslbeck-Dilfer, depending on how it's counted. Kitna-Dilfer-Hasslebeck isn't correct in any assesment. Please see the article on Seahawk starting QB order in order to make disputes to this ordering system.
Please see Seattle Seahawks Starting Quarterbacks before making edits to the succession box. There is a place to talk about the ordering system we wish to use for Seahawk quarterbacks there. If we should use a different system than what is in place now, that would be the place to discuss it. To date, no one has made any argument against the current system on that discussion space. --Don Sowell 18:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seahawks Starting QB

message: The article is pretty slanted.  He has always been an average at best qb, and this article makes it out like he's spectacular.  Did he write it?  You might want to add an update - he was a dismal failure this year with the 49ers, with 7 TDs, 12 INTs, and a 55.1 passer rating.  They saw a big improvement putting in their 3rd string qb who hadn't even set foot on the field in 5 years. 
I don't hate the guy, but his career avg rating is 70, and that's exactly as good as he is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.161.162 (talk) 01:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I DO agree that there needs to be more information, including a win-loss record (the TRUE statistic by which QBs are judged).  The Seahawks section reads funny, and it should be clarified that Dilfer got the starting job due to Hasselbeck's poor play, and then vice-versa.  Another interesting note was that during the Sharpie game, the Seahawks were within reach of the 49ers, and driving towards the endzone at the end of the game before Dilfer threw a critical interception. Smackalot (talk) 05:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a pro-Dilfer press release?

message: Niners terminate quarterback Trent Dilfer's contractUser:calbear22 (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then add it?►Chris NelsonHolla! 00:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good source

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Trent Dilfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060529011450/http://sf49ers.com/team/roster_detail.php?PRKey=80§ion=TE%20Roster to http://www.sf49ers.com/team/roster_detail.php?PRKey=80§ion=TE%20Roster
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Trent Dilfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723070302/http://forums.49ers.com/messageboard/showthread.php?t=1976 to http://forums.49ers.com/messageboard/showthread.php?t=1976
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: He's gonna be the coach at UAB, probably.  Somarain (talk) 04:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone do the thing that happens when there's a news story 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion