lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saskatchewan Polytechnic

message: Saskatchewan Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology  → Saskatchewan Institute of Applied Science and Technology  – {The word "Science" in the official name of the institute should be in singular form, not plural. In other words, the name of the institute in the original article is wrong.} copied from the entry on the WP:RM page
===Survey===
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support The institute's name was mis-spelled in the original article. Dakelv 18:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support The institute's name was mis-spelled in the original article. Dakelv 18:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *Move If it is the official name - why even bother to go through this process! -- Chris Lester talk 17:28, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: "Until 2018, all four campuses had athletic teams that competed in the Prairie Athletic Conference." So what happened then? Did one or more of them switch conferences? Did one or more of them shut down their sports programs? Did they amalgamate their programs? Do any of them still have a program at all?--User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 21:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  And then?
Talk:Elizabeth Bekker

message: Seems daft to have two articles - redirection would cope. The only question - what to call it? - Trident13 17:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about "Elizabeth ("Betje") Wolff-Bekker" (and removing the "always goes by" part, because that's demonstrably untrue... Tubby Spencer 06:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I ought to mention, I'd be bold, so to speak, but I'm new and don't know how to merge... Tubby Spencer 06:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Martlet

message: I've heard the cadency-martlet explained thus: the first son inherits the land, the second and third traditionally go into the Church and the Army, and the fourth has no place to land.  Is this worth putting in the article?  —Tamfang 17:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! If you've got a source! (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 19:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  the fourth son 

message: Please change references to www.briantimms.net or www.briantimms.com to www.briantimms.fr, which is the authentic site. The first two no longer exist.
Thank you.
Brian Timms  --Clodagh1 (talk) 09:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of reference links 

message: There is much needed emphasis in this article on distinguishing between the English martlet and the French merlette, which are completely different. Unfortunately wiki commons has placed merlettes in the category martlet, possibly due to French contributors not appreciating the difference. (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  French merlette 
Talk:Cerulean Sins

message: I've rated this as a start class article.  IMHO, the article needs:
#Info for other releases
#More detailed description of characters
#Links to any verifiable reviews
#An overall check for any other items missing from the template
I know that we don't normally edit other's text, but please feel free to add or strike items above and add a note below regarding any amendments. TheronJ 15:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:Paul S. Newman

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The line "By the 1980s, he was writing for the DC Comics series G.I. Combat and House of Mystery; for Marvel's licensed Disney comic Darkwing Duck; and industrial films and audio-visual presentations." raises several concerns - as best as I can find, using both comics.org and Mile High's listings, Marvel never put out a Darkwing Duck title nor any features. And in any case, they would not have put out a Darkwing Duck title in the 1980s; the character's TV series debuted in 1991, and Marvel didn't gain the Disney license until 1994. Is there some nugget of truth to be rescued in this claim? An unreleased Marvel project? --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Finding this, he clearly wrote at least one DarkWing script, by 1995... so possible it was for Marvel, but I'm not finding Marvel having published any DarkWing Duck. (Anyone have the January 1997 Comic Book Marketplace that lists his full output?) --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right on. The reference came from the fan site Solar Guard, which appears to be in error. The three Darkwing Duck titles at Grand Comics Database are all Disney comics. The title of the script, given at the Bowling Green U. site, doesn't show up in GCD, but that may be because the entries for the Darkwing Duck aren't all filled-in. I'll go ahead and add your change and that new link (which alone is important enough to add!). --Tenebrae (talk) 02:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darkwing Duck?
Talk:Commack, New York

message: Added some info, more reliable sources for this social icon needed--Work permit 02:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commack Motor Inn

message: I deleted the reference.  Links should be fundamental to the subject of the article, distinguish it from other subjects, or impact the article it in some meaningful way. --Work permit 18:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chabad middle school

message: I deleted statements that Aaron Burr lived in Commack.  I find no references supporting this.  following article would appear to say it was a distant relative who lived in Commack.--Work permit (talk) 01:43, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burr 

message: I also added a brief description of Sunshine acres and added it as a notable site.
:The former Brindley Field airport should be here too. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  13:25, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Sites 
Talk:Departments of Paraguay

message: Is it possible for somebody to make a new Paraguay map for this page. The problem with the current image is that it shows 18 departments when Paraguay has only 17. This is a map with the correct division: click here. Note that Asuncion is not a department.
I have found one site () that describes Asunción as a "capitol district" rather than a "department", but on the map it is still a separate entity from the departments.  I will make this adjustment in the article.  --Lasunncty 01:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Paraguay Map for this Page
Talk:Pikachu/to do

message: *"Pikachu is most famous for being the "face" of the Pokémon franchise, perhaps being the most widely recognised around the world. " - needs reference
*does not have enough footnoting, and could use with a few more references.
*needs to have its grammar and spelling checked and corrected. 
*The cultural impact is in stub form. 
*WP:LEAD is pretty poor 
*lots of Weasel words (eg "probably, the most popular") a fair dose of repeating itself, 
*some needless references to the editor's other favourite Nintendo games. 
*The cultural impact section is still a bulleted list. 
*The biology section is written from an in-universe perspective 
*The "in the anime" section is headed up with a decorative image (can we replace it with a screenshot of Pikachu and Ash?)
*Game names aren't always in italics. 
*In the anime section, paragraphs often start off talking about one thing and end talking about another.
*There could be better linking- like in Biology, various electrical concepts aren't linked like they could be. 
*Some of the wordings bother me: "Pikachu is the only Pokémon in Ash's huge party that has been with him in every series, although a Phanpy he rose from an egg joined him after he travelled around Hoenn." 
*"Many of the Pokémon animated shorts with all-Pokémon dialogue have featured Pikachu as the main character, often as the main voice of reason. " 
*some concepts are casually thrown in without explanation or linking (like a "Phanpy"). 
*the order of the sections feel haphazard and mixed together. (Why is anime Pikachu's diet in that section? Why does a description of in-game pikachus separate the anime and manga sections? etc.)
:All tasks completed —M inun   (Spiderman)  15:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:LIFECYCLE Fundraising

message: Will be / are being redone something like properly over the next day or two. Bear with me. KeithDunnett 04:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Let me review the article and see if I can come up with some more constructive advice for you.  Just finished up cleaning up some vandalism from my user talk space.  KC9CQJ 18:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV tag 

message: Lifecycle Fundraising is now known as True Volunteer Foundation.  Could you please help me in getting the title of the article changed so it reads True Volunteer Foundation.  Also can I then edit the article so it is completely up to date and links to the website.  Many thanks Truevolunteer1 (talk) 12:58, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Public utility district

message: I can't find any references to any legal distinction between a municipal and public utility district.  I did see one company that was offering consulting services to help establish both types of utility districts.  I strongly suspect that in some US states that there may be a legal difference, but that for the purposes of Wikipedia that effectively the two are essentially the same.  I think we should edit the article to reflect this or find some way to differentiate between MUDs and PUDs.  MCalamari 17:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [no title]

message: This article or page is essentially identical to Municipal utility district as such I suggest the two be merged into the article District.——→StephenTS42 (talk) 19:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 07:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment: Merger proposal
Talk:Lacey Sturm

message: I have been linking a name to a site. This site I am not affiliated with nor trying to sell something. The link to Whosoevers is linking to Brain Welch and needs to go to their own page. 
Since when is a legitimate link not allowed?  98.177.111.254 (talk) 22:49, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links
Talk:Sean Sutton

message: I do not see why this is relevant to Sean Sutton.  The section does not mention him in any way.  He was not involved in the crash.  I believe this section does not belong here and is referenced in other, more relevant pages.  It should be removed. MattWatt (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2001 Plane Crash Section
Talk:Vermeil

message: ::I believe the correct word for gold is Karat, not carat. As a jeweler, I experience the difference, daily. Even though Karat and Carat have the same origins, the common usage for Carat today is a term used in the measurement of gemstones.  Karat is employed when discussing the purity of gold.  The related link: "carat"  I think, should also be changed to Karat.  Is there any reason that the author chose the word carat to be interchangeable with karat? Any ideas?  Thanks. BellaLuLoo1 (talk) 18:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct usage of the word "carat" vs. "karat"

message: I'm not sure, but don't current standards say that vermeil has to be 22k now?  Or is that just the most common form?  I couldn't find information on this.  Thanks. Saleah 18:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current standards

message: I'm just wondering about the sources of this article, particularly given the query about the very specific figures given, and the IPA pronunciation, as those diphthongs look odd and I'm not sure what the circumflex on the [u] represents (perhaps my computer is mangling a combining diacritical?). 79.68.202.189 (talk) 07:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: There now is a page on Silver-gilt here... it seems that either it or this one is one too many on the subject. I don't have the technical expertise to effect a redirect and am not sure I have the requisite knowledge to properly merge the contents of this page into the Silver-gilt one, but I have an idea this would be the best course. Anybody wants to chip in? --Svartalf (talk) 22:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vermeil vs Silver-gilt
Talk:List of universities and colleges in Cyprus

message: * This article only features the Greek colleges and very few Turkish universities. This is not a NPOV. --Seksen iki yüz kırk beş (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article includes the universities both in the TRNC and the "Republic of Cyprus". We should change the article's title as Cyprus (island) and RoC articles have not been split yet. Additionally, no need to "invent" a Greek name for the universities in Northern Cyprus as the official language is Turkish there. (And this is the English Wikipedia.) --E4024 (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Universities on the Island

message: European University Cyprus seems to be missing from the list. Ivo (talk) 08:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something to be added
Talk:Circana

message: This sounds like a press release.
:Edited. Shawnc 04:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: What does NPD stand for? 84.12.83.135 18:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does NPD stand for? 

message: The link to the first reference is broken.  Sorry forgot the 67.169.124.42 (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link is broken 

message: Are the results of NPD research publicly available? Or does a person (or organization, realistically) have to purchase access to them? Typically, I seem them cited by news articles, but I've never actually seen one of their reports. RobertM525 (talk) 19:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public availability? 

message: They claim they are are global company, but their name, and the data they producr seems to be purely (or mostly) North American.  Can anyone prove they aren't just showning American trends?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.75.83.25 (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global or National
Talk:Ao (color)

message: This article was the subject of an Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion discussion closed on 19 May 2006.  The result Keep without prejudice to merging or redirection, the further discussion of which may be undertaken here by anyone wishing to do so. Xoloz 18:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD Result Notice

message: An entry in List of colors: A–F contained a link to this page.
The entry is:
Apple
I don't see any evidence that this color is discussed in this article and plan to delete it from the list per this discussion: Talk:List_of_colors#New_approach_to_review_of_entries
If someone decides that this color should have a section in this article and it is added, I would appreciate a ping.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal under discussion
Talk:Joy Press

message: Was going to  this but noted her husband is actually of decent note so perhaps someone can expand on this a little, in the meantime I merely 'd it. Jachin 18:33, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Because of Romek

message: Because of Romek was described in previous revisions as a novel. The term "novel" in correct use strictly applies only to works of fiction.  I do not believe it was anyone's intention to cast aspersions on the veracity of Faber's account. That said, given the disturbing popularity of Holocaust Denial, I thought it best to remove the misused term so as to avoid any and all ambiguity. 68.72.101.245 18:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Pterosaurs

message: I disagree with the proposed merge of List of pterosaur classifications into Pterosaur. The list is just that, a list of already lengthy classification scemes, that wouldtake up an enourmous amount of room in the main article with little good reason. Pterosaur classification is already well summarized in the mai article.Dinoguy2 18:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nasal septum

message: "The nasal septum, sometimes also called columella...": IMO, nasal septum and columella are not synonyms, but columella is the lower (fleshy) border of the nasal septum (see e.g. http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/columella and other medical dictionaries). Thanks for correcting. Ahschulz 05:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  columella 

message: Is this mention a case of vandalism or is this part for real? It sounds just not right to this layman.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.153.51.43 (talk) 20:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nose picking

message: this article does not explain the purpose/benefit of having the nostril separation, or other function of the nasal septum.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.14.106 (talk) 06:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  function? 

message: I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:
* There is no need for the information on ossification to be hidden away on a separate article. This means the information is not presented as it could be, and it is needlessly fragmented.
* It is standard on Anatomy pages, and recommended in WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy, for 'Development' sections to be displayed on the same page. 
* Additionally, this page is small and it would give more context to have the information displayed in a central location, rather than hidden on a separate article. 
* If necessary, the article on ossification could be expanded at a later date. LT910001 (talk) 07:18, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Ossification of vomer]]
Talk:Harbingers (comics)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support I am the nominator -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 04:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest using  for the title and  for the categorisation of characters.  Otherwise we could use something like:  and   GregKaye 06:38, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Even if this article should be pluralized, because of SINGULAR, "Harbinger (Valiant Comics)" is hopelessly ambiguous, as it can refer to a member of the harbingers or the particular Harbinger, and would not work, failing WP:PRECISE. So even if this article becomes Harbingers (Valiant Comics), the other article cannot use the singular without additional disambiguation. -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 05:32, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: An editor has requested for Harbinger (comics) to be moved to another page. Since you had some involvement with Harbinger (comics), you might want to participate in the move discussion (if you have not already done so). -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 04:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harbinger (comics) listed at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|Requested moves]]
Talk:The Serial

message: I think that I read somewhere once, that, when this first appeared in Marin County, the author got death threats. When I first read it circa '78 or '79, I had been somewhat exposed to the lifestyle and trends satirized, the stuff was not confined to Marin County (which, one discovers in this book, is the orginal source, the ding-an-sich, the essence) but had spread like jimson weed. This wonderful book was the perfect spoof and antidote; and, like all the really best satires goes to the underlying, ridiculous frailty and fatuity of people.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.101.67 (talk) 19:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone confirm... 

message: There's nothing in this article discussing the relationship of The Serial to Armistead Maupin's Tales of the City, which The Serial is a kind of spin-off of. What became Maupin's novel started out in serialized form in the Marin County weekly The Pacific Sun under the title The Serial and later moved to the San Francisco Chronicle. Cyra McFadden's Marin-centred serial was then published in The Pacific Sun under the same title as a replacement. The source already linked to in this article as "That 70s Novel" covers this story in detail. Peter G Werner (talk) 18:27, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to ''Tales of the City''
Talk:Beach Pneumatic Transit

message: Expansion
The article's fine as a short entry, but I know there's plenty of info out there which an greatly expand it... is someone up for the challenge?
-Kingpin1005
This article overlaps significantly with the Alfred Beach article. - Richard E 13:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

message: This article currently claims:
:Several similar tunnels were found under Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn New York. A locomotive is being sought.
I suspect this is referring to the Cobble Hill Tunnel under Atlantic Avenue which was used by steam locomotives not by vacuum/air pressure locomotives, but was nevertheless an early "subway" tunnel in Brooklyn's history (before Brooklyn was a part of New York City).  Can someone find a reliable source to back the claims made in the two sentences?  Are they referring to the Cobble Hill Tunnel?  Who is looking for a locomotive and why is it relevant to this Beach article? Should the Cobble Hill Tunnel instead be mentioned in the History of the New York City Subway article or perhaps the History of New York City transportation article (or both)? 67.86.73.252 (talk) 01:22, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's unlikely that the locomotive comment is relevant here at all. The Beach train was a loose car driven by fans that were part of the tunnel: there was no locomotive car in any sense and I can't find any reference that suggests that future enhancements would have had one either. I'm removing that phrase. DMacks (talk) 19:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cobble Hill Tunnel 

message: Atomic Robo vol. 6 is "The Ghost of Station X". It's vol. 5 that is "The Deadly art of Science". Not owning either of these graphic novels, I'm not sure which the article should be referring to. 24.2.150.6 (talk) 10:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I tagged the item. Hopefully someone will be able to verify which one is intended there. DMacks (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect reference in popular culture 
Talk:Plane of immanence

message: Some theologians have suggested that religions are a plane of immanence. See for example the death of God theological movement, where it says that Altizer offered a radical theology of the death of God that drew upon William Blake, Hegelian thought and Nietzschean ideas. He conceived of theology as a form of poetry in which the immanence (presence) of God could be encountered in faith communities. ADM (talk) 19:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Religions

message: I call bull. A PoMo bull. The sentences such as:
 "The plane of immanence thus is often called a plane of consistency accordingly. As a geometric plane, it is in no way bound to a mental design but rather an abstract or virtual design; which for Deleuze, is the metaphysical or ontological itself:"
are riddled with grammatical errors and mean little. I suggest a drastic rewrite of this article, but then I doubt if anything encyclopedic would be left thereof... 
Zezen (talk) 02:48, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: PoMo gobbledygook

message: It’s not clear to me that the box on Planes of existence is relevant here. I suggest removing it. Spiralford (talk) 13:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the box on Planes of Existence from this page.