lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:International Federation of American Football

message: Under goals, what does "Participation in the World Games as well as the Olympic Games to be stong to play football" mean? I can't figure out what "stong" means, and "strong" doesn't fit the context. - BillCJ (talk) 05:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarity

message: Can anyone confirm that New Zealand was suspended? BDota (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New Zealand

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa (talk) 22:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: There is currently a de facto schism with more than one group claiming to be the legitimate head of IFAF. Why is this not mentioned anywhere on this article? Hobbitschuster (talk) 21:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently CAS has decided against the Paris faction led by Tommy Wiking, which means that once the decision is officially published this article will represent only the illegitimate side. In this case the article should be rewritten according to the CAS opinion and possibly a separate new article be created for Wiking's post-2015 organization should they choose to ignore the court decision. -2001:14BA:1FFE:6900:8528:3E73:4B83:660D (talk) 11:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: They haven't actually determined which one is official, just that Wiking had resigned, while records in Paris say Maclean, Wiking's group is still seated in Paris, with the other group in New York. There has to be a way to get that across better, plus there are plenty of problems that have to be noted where different factions ran different tournaments.2604:2D80:800A:8168:A911:BCA8:420A:D2FA (talk) 00:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schism
Talk:2006 Africa Cup

message: This page needs fixed by someone who has access to the tournament details.  There are errors in some dates - the month/day have been transposed (10th June instead of 6th October, for example) and also Senegal is listed as finishing second in their group with 2 points, despite seemingly having lost both of their games. 92.18.147.69 (talk) 01:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors in page
Talk:Dreams of Love – Liszt

message: In 1970, Russia was a part of the Soviet Union.  Even though Mosfilm is located in Moscow, Russia, it is more appropriate to state that this film was a Hungarian-Soviet production.  Therefore, I'm making the necessary changes to this article to replace references to Russia with the Soviet Union. --Ericdn (talk) 08:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia -> Soviet Union 

message: I find no sources using the current title of this article (Franz Liszt. Dreams of love). I suggest to move this article to the Hungarian language title Szerelmi álmok – Liszt (with an –), in line with most of the entries in :Category:Films directed by Márton Keleti; see also:  "Szerelmi álmok" site:en.wikipedia.org</span>. Additional REDIRECTs from "Dreams of Love - Liszt" (with an ordinary "-") and "The Loves of Liszt" might also be appropriate. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Oysterband

message: Hi, I found what seemed a better band article. Not knowing zip about the topic, I uploaded it and placed it here midway for you to do with as you see fit. Seems the one on top is too blurry, and the one I added a tad too dark. ??  Good luck! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 20:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea who they are at all :)  However file is re-uploaded having tweaked it a bit.  Thanks --Herby talk thyme 20:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  To the Guardians of this article: 

message: Not sure Handsome Family could be described as 'young, emerging folk musicians', even at the time of the Big Session tours. Murkeychris (talk) 07:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handsome Family 

message: Why is almost every album a redrict back to the Oysterband. Their might be one or two ones that are not are a redrict, so can someone remove all the album redricts to oysterband and leave the albums that have articles alone.--213.83.125.225 (talk) 11:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redrict 

message: Was it 1978 or 1980 ? - both dates are given here. -- Beardo (talk) 19:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First album 

message: What is the point of all the re-directs back to this same page in the links for most of the albums? This is really very annoying if one expects these "blue links" to all work? Surely better to have no link or even a red link? Thanks. BridesheadRecarpeted (talk) 22:52, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created pages for all the albums redirected. They're all stubs at the moment, some very much so, so in the spirit of Wikipedia feel free to fire in and expand them yorkshiresky (talk) 19:24, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see that Bridesheadredcarpeted was not the first to hate the connected albums. There is a post from someone on 14 June 2010 (see abve) going on about the same thing. I'm going to add to some of the pages now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TangoTizerWolfstone (talk • contribs) 18:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah that was a great idea. Thank you, but not all the credit deserves to go to those two loads--Lewi6400youtubeChannel (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album links?! 

message: got redirected to this page whilst looking for info on jonesy. well, that sort of makes sense, since it was jones' band.
BUT WHERE DOES IT SAY THAT?  has someone excised a whole section, or enthusiastically installed a link to here on the disambiguation page?
either way, it needs fixing.
duncanrmi (talk) 09:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  what the...? who the...?
Template talk:The Used

message: Could someone explain what the issue is with Pretty Handsome Awkward? SlimVirgin (talk)(contribs) 17:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has been deleted (although I'm not sure why) and no sources exist on either The Used or Lies for the Liars for it being the next single. It was initally created relatively early as I believe it was the first track previewed from the album. --Jamdav86 18:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i added the source, the used annouced it has the next single about a month ago but some1 delted the apge so i added a source to the single. and if jamdava needs proof tell them to go to the used myspace where video stills have been posted. Xotheusedguyox 19:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm waiting for concrete proof of it being a single, just like they all the editors that voted for it's deletion. I don't find Myspace a reputable source, nor do I find YouTube one either. I've heard rumors that they are making a video, but that doesn't count as a single. Liar Liar (Burn in Hell) never had a video, and I'm Not Okay (I Promise) had a low budget video before the song was ever a single. If I remember, the album "Plans" by Death Cab had videos for every song. Dark jedi requiem 19:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Single

message: These should not be added to the discography page. As a different band, they do not belong here. A similar situation is Stutterfly and Secret and Whisper. Both band's albums are not pooled together. Dark jedi requiem 01:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange itch and Dumb Luck 

message: | group2 = Live albums
| list2  =
* Berth
* Live & Acoustic at the Palace
69.201.64.200 (talk) 04:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Live & Acoustic at the Palace does not have an article. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2016
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Structure drawing workgroup/Archive Jun 2007

message: For those running Unix/Gnome, you may be interested in GChemPaint. Jean BrÃ©fort has updated the software to include the features we discussed for ChemSketch above, viz:
*Draw the structure
*Create a PNG file directly, with Wikipedia settings
*Embed the InChI in the PNG in such a way that Google can find it.
He created this PNG of quassin in ChemPaint with an embedded InChI. Feedback is appreciated. Walkerma 05:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice one, but I don't use Unix :( Also the diagonal double bonds to oxygen look a little bit out... Physchim62 (talk) 09:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GChemPaint now able to autogenerate PNGs containing embedded InChI
Talk:Ghost Box Records

message: I have reverted this, as the label has received large amounts of coverage in the British music press in the last few years, most notable being the nomination of Broadcast and The Focus Group Investigate Witch Cults Of The Radio Age as best album of 2009 by The Wire (magazine). Kaini (talk) 04:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of notability tag 
Talk:Misha Segal

message: I insist that the information about any religious affiliation is not posted. Whether I am a Jew or a Scientologist or a Buddhist. I am getting very frustrated with your attitude at this point. There are matters which must be kept private. Here and there people have been taking the liberty to assume that I am involved in one thing or another. Not all of it is true and I have no time and no patience to deal with this. Please, whoever keeps posting this again and again - against my will - enough! Respect my will to keep certain things private. This is not vital information about, it is just sensationalism. 
Mjzz (talk) 07:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: the above contributor has claimed to be the subject of this article, though this has not been verified. In any case, this is immaterial, as the contested material should never have been added: see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Misha Segal. Anything sourced to Newsblaze or The Hollywood Sentinel should be deleted on sight as failing WP:RS by a mile. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit concerning religious belief

message: I did a thorough scrubbing of some extremely promotional content. Segal is notable, but the content was so promotional that it almost merited a speedy deletion, so please be cautious with any future additions! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional content
Talk:Percival Pollard

message: Actually, apparently not. In Letters From Bohemia by Ben Hecht (pp. 76-79), Hecht relates a story about Pollard that Mencken told him. Pollard came to Baltimore to die of TB because Mencken had written him a number of adulatory letters. Mencken tried to get the remains mailed back to Iowa, but was told it was against federal law. A friend was the head bartender at a saloon frequented by big-name politicians, and told Mencken he would arrange it. However, later he confessed that he could not, because no-one wanted to take the chance of violating federal law. So he threw away the ashes, wrapped a box of Cremo cigars in tin foil, and sent that to the aunt in Waterloo, where the cigars were buried in the family graveyard under a nice tombstone. Mencken's point was "the dangers of becoming a literary man." However, this is a more major change than I am confident doing here, so I am leaving it to others to decide. PapayaSF (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "His cremated remains were sent back to Iowa."
Talk:Georgette Leblanc

message: https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2020/10/22/the-lesbian-partnership-that-changed-literature/
 Some sources say it's just speculation, but it sounds like a romantic friendship/Boston marriage, at least, and probably more. It's not really consistent to say she was bisexual in the categories, but then say Margaret Anderson was just a close friend in the actual article. 188.29.206.237 (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  she and the lesbian Margaret C Anderson were lovers
Talk:Finger-four

message: Can inline citations be added to the article? That would really be grand. nadav (talk) 05:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (First comments)

message: I am currently looking at the MCH 11F16 Vol. 5 (F-16 Combat Aircraft Fundamentals, Multi-Command Handbook) and it calls the Finger Four formation 'Fingertip.' From the description they appear to be the same formation. (75.65.220.204 (talk) 21:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finger Four = Fingertip? 
Talk:Century 21 (department store)

message: It's a chain of department stores? That doesn't make it notable by itself. --68.161.139.57 (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't it? 208.118.163.99 (talk) 19:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability should be in lede
Talk:William Denis Browne

message: The reference at the end of the first para covers, in what's a standard way of referencing, the whole paragraph.  David Underdown (talk) 07:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately this is a subscription-only site and so fails verifiability. Either a better source should be found, or else we should remove the claim if no other source can be found. --John (talk) 14:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: External links may not be subscription sites, but the suggestion this should be applied to the verifiability policy has been repeatedly dismissed.  In any case every UK resident has the potential for access by entering their library card number (with a prefix for their local council), and the work is also published in book form and is widely available in reference libraries around the world.  It is a standard reference work.  David Underdown (talk) 15:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglo-irish 
Talk:Elizabeth Robins Pennell

message: Apparently she and her husband were early cycle tourists in Italy . Here's a photo. Their collection is held at the Library of Congress here.
BrainyBabe (talk) 15:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 
Talk:Cemaes Bay F.C.

message: I've removed the whole history section again, as it was copy-pasted from http://www.welsh-premier.com (this 2008 edit exactly matches this 2007 archive result). Interplanet Janet (talk) 07:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent copyvio
Talk:Sadakichi Hartmann

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.ca/books?id=X6X_AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA124. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa (talk) 15:06, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The article cites no source attesting to this. 
Britannica describes him as a "poet of anarchy," but it's unclear what this means viz. his personal anarchism, and they too cite no source.  
In fact, this article explicitly qualifies his personal commitment to anarchism, claiming,
Although he was far less political than aesthetic in orientation ("I was always somewhat of an esthetic sybarite, looking primarily for manifestations of Plato's fine frenzy, Aristotle's purification of thought and sentiment, and Schopenhauer's moments of cognition."), Hartmann was a participant in the anarchist movement, joining Emma Goldman, Edwin Bjorkman, and John R. Coryell in founding the magazine Mother Earth. While he remained friendly with the anarchists, he never was able to commit himself to the movement in a genuinely activist way. Rather, he remained throughout his life skeptical, even pessimistic, about extreme political ideologies. As for the possibility that anarchism might work, his philosopher Kung in Confucius (1923) warns: "A cook is needed even for the most frugal brew."
 Zachary123212 (talk) 19:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Hartmann an anarchist?
Talk:Han Ye-seul

message: Something doesn't match up here. The article says she was born and raised in Los Angeles, but the nationality flag indicates she is South Korean and this article is in the category "Korean immigrants to the United States". If she was born in Los Angeles, then she's not an immigrant and she is an American; possibly with dual citizenships, South Korean and American.
According to one of the references she renounced her U.S. citizenship in 2004. I will change the nationality. Quickfoot (talk) 23:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Korean or American or both?

message: It seems that the poor grammar in the article "She has Fluent in both English and Korean." and the fact that the article is more of a resume than a biographical work
indicates that this was written by someone who speaks English as a second language (probably Korean) has a vested interest in her being hired by someone. Why is fluent
capitalized, why is "has" used where "is" or "speaks" should be placed? This article is not neutral. It is merely a resume posted to Wikipedia by her agent.
98.234.90.30 (talk) 05:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, i'd say all the celebrities' pages get input from fans, of course it's biased, if you're uncomfortable then just modify.
== Other appearences
Don't know much about it but there is the "Nine tailed fox" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0487239/?ref_=nm_knf_t4  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.228.195.185 (talk) 22:39, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this article written by her Korean agent?
Talk:The Special Garage Concerts Vol I

message: Hello,
I’ve added two citations. They are two seperate articles relating to this live album in Prog Magazine, which is hopefully considered a good source since it has its own Wiki page.
What’s next to get that notability warning removed? 180.150.114.232 (talk) 07:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations added, notability
Template talk:Administrators' noticeboard archives

message: What about adding WP:RS/N to the box?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  05:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:RS/N 

message: I boldly added a  to this template, precisely so that it would affect every archive and that none of the archives would be indexed. A subsequent edit by Edokter reverted it. That was B, and R, so let's discuss. Why would not having these pages be indexed not be a good thing?  ++Lar: t/c 02:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOINDEX 

message: Howdy. I'm not sure how many people have this watched, but I thought I would share some thoughts.  I think that this template could become more useful if the number of redlinks was reduced and they were replaced with existing archives. It appears that new AN archive pages are made by a bot. If so, then there doesn't appear to be a point to having the red links in the template. So instead of showing archive numbers 221-240 with the last 6 being red links, maybe we could show 216-235 (to reduce the redlinks to 1 per section)? After a new archive is created, the archives shown could be shifted over one?. Any thoughts?--Rockfang (talk) 22:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Came from ANCurrently the nav template appears to be updated manually. As a practical matter, to do what your asking would require a bot to frequently update the template so that it keeps up with the newest archives. I guess you could pursue getting a bot for it, don't see any harm in doing that, but not sure if its worth the effort either. Monty845 02:09, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Increasing the potential usefulness 

message: Updates the module to deliver 20 archives per noticeboard for this compact version, rather than a number between 11 and 20 depending on the cardinality of the archives.  All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 20 archives

message: This has been obsolete for 5 years.  I propose to replace the navboxes in the 14 Community sanction noticeboard archives with a compact version, then change the default for this full navbox to leave out the csn. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 16:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Community sanction noticeboard

message: The content of this template doesn't show up at all on mobile. All I see is the words "Noticeboard archives" in bold and the template view/talk/edit links. Hairy Dude (talk) 22:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile
Talk:Pup on a Picnic

message: Is it a fact that this short was produced in both academy format AND cinemascope? I have compared the European DVD (which features the academy version) and the US DVD (which features a (!) widescreen version) and it seems that there is no frame where there is something missing in the academy version, but instead it seems that the widescreen version from the US-DVDs has simply been cropped from the original academy version. Additionally, none of the shorts that has indeed been produced in both cinemascope and academy format is included in the academy format on the European set but the pan & scan versions are used instead, which would make this short strangely special. Moreover, the title card fits perfectly, which is unusual as on real cinemascope the card is usually too wide even for a 16:9 screen. 
I am pretty certain that this particular short was not produced in cinemascope at all. Anyone please clarify, at best with pictures comparing both versions (as is done with some of the other cartoons).
--Kattjosh (talk) 23:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Academy Format only or Cinemascope as well?