Talk:The Sand Pebbles (film)

message: :Image:195648.1020.A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:195648.1020.A.jpg

message: i believe that the US didn't expand the war into Laos and then Cambodia until a few years after the film's release.  Certainly we didn't invade Cambodia until 1970, and our bombing raids had only started the year before that.  based on these facts i'm deleting the reference to the war's expansion into Cambodia and Laos.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.152.132 (talk) 09:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Contemporary movie reviews (now cited) are quite strong in saying the movie has a Vietnam war theme. Whether we agree or not, that's what the reviewers were saying. Regards, DMorpheus (talk) 17:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  expansion of the Vietnam war into Cambodia and Laos? 

message: the main theme of the film is not racism, colonialism, or some Vietnam analogy.  it is how the men of the ship reduce their lives to some small point, that the Steve McQueen character does that too some degree, but that events break him out of it.  he can't help but see things in a bigger context, that the Mako character is a man and not merely a coolie, for example.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.152.132 (talk) 18:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The entire first few scenes are devoted to showing the racism of the sailors and the imperialism of the US and Europeans. Subsequent scenes strongly reinforce that theme. Holman's ("whole-man", get it?) progress in gradually overcoming his own prejudices, and his general 'rebel' status within the crew, is how the theme is developed. Frenchy's love of Maily is another thread of that theme. The reviewers at the time (cited in the article now) saw this movie as strongly anti-imperialist and directed right at the growing (at that time) US involvement in Vietnam. I don't see how this movie's major themes could possibly be interpreted any other way; certainly there are smaller themes but those are the main ones. Regards, DMorpheus (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do what you want with this; I have no dog in the fight. But the first point made above is correct: the novel and film both are themed about the entrapment of men in a small garrison, in this case the ship. Schikel makes the point in the Life review, which does NOT mention or even allude to Vietnam (making both the original assertion and footnote in error--perhaps it was supposed to be Time's review, which parroted NYT's). The imperialism alluded to is in the dialogue/perception of the characters, particularly Jameson, not the script per se. This looks to me like the case of one review (NYT, which I recall reading myself, btw, but not exactly agenda-free, eh?) and possibly a substantital dose of OR.--Reedmalloy (talk) 08:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  theme is not adequately addressed. 

message: The Chinese forces fighting the San Pablo are explicitly identified in the film as being Nationalists loyal to the KMT, not communists. I have corrected the article. Regards, DMorpheus (talk) 14:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese forces

message: The cited source states that the design of the ship was based on the "USS Villa Lobos" {sic].  I find this doubtful as it is a very different ship - note the stern counter, for one thing in the Wikipedia article on the USS Villalobos (PG-42).  Additionally, the same source states that it was an un-powered prop, incapable of moving under it's own power, which is clearly wrong - one of the DVD documentaries, titled "The Secret of the San Pablo" highlights the Cummins diesels used to power the ship.  I haven't been able to find a reliable source for the design, but it is similar to the USS Panay albeit with a single stack.  I will continue to look for a reliable reference.SeaphotoTalk 03:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for the design of the USS San Pablo

message: Not sure if this is useful to clarify anything, but on this episode of "What's My Line?", Steve McQueen talks about filming problems and locations for this movie. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 02:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filming Problems & Locations