lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nairana-class escort carrier

message: Is it really that notable that this class was built in different parts of the UK? I think it's a bit of a stretch to say they were built in three different countries when they were all built in the UK, I think it gives the impression that some or all of the class wasn't built in the United Kingdom. G.R. Allison (talk) 15:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: England, Northern Ireland and Scotland are three separate countries, with there own governments and parliaments. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 18:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with G R Allison - they are indeed called "countries" and are different, but they are certainly not separate now and were even less so at the time. See Countries of the United Kingdom.   --Wikiain (talk) 23:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Precisely, they may be called 'countries' in common usage of that word but they are certainly not countries in the sense they are not sovereign states and are all part of (regardless of any national feelings to the contrary) the country of the United Kingdom. The certainly not separate in any meaningful way (the entire reason I brought this point up) and as for their governments, remember the UK government is the overriding authority (like the federal government in the US). I'll propose a reword the text or either be bold and do it myself soon if there are no major disagreements. G.R. Allison (talk) 07:07, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Side note here, I don't think England does actually have its own government and parliament. For obvious reasons Westminster can't be counted. England is governed from the UK parliament oddly enough. G.R. Allison (talk) 07:25, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to England Scotland and Northern Ireland.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "They were constructed in three different countries"
Talk:We Want Your Soul

message: A previous version of this article described the song that was the basis of an episode of the program Class of 3000; the article went through AfD and was deleted. This article has nothing to do with that article. DS (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The synthesizer used for the vocals in this track is often used in music production. What is its name? --Abdull (talk) 00:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice synthesizer 
Talk:Alder Valley

message: Not sure why you are considering deleting this article.
It's about a us company - much like several other articles aboiut bus companies. The text is identical to (in fact is cut and pasted from) another article. Being unable to edit the title of the article, I created a new article with a more appropiate heading and pasted the text across. As things stand there are now two articles with the same tet and different headers, whic is obviously daft. Please delete the other one (Thames Valley and Aldersot Omnibus Company), not his one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fletch5535 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 20 November 2007
:I actually just declined the speedy deletion of this article while you were typing this.  The best thing you can do for this article would be to add sources so that the notability of the company is proven and the article fulfills Wikipedia's verifiability policy.  Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 20:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine

message: This whole article really reads like a pamphlet made by D.O. schools; practically no mention of the drawbacks, difference in career prospects, why they are only recognized in USA (in practice), etc. while articles about M.D.s talk at length about why they suck Xoronako (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One sided view 

message: "The curricula at DO-granting medical schools are equivalent to those at MD-granting medical schools, which focus the first two years on the biomedical and clinical sciences, then two years on core clinical training in the clinical specialities.[8]"
[8] is Kasper, Dennis L., Eugene Braunwald, Anthony S. Fauci, Stephen L. Hauser, Dan L. Longo, J. Larry Jameson, Kurt J. Isselbacher (2004). "Chapter 10. Complementary and Alternative Medicine". Harrison's principles of internal medicine (16th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-139140-5.
A textbook, from 2004 no less, isn't accurate or sufficient source to claim curriculum is the same, especially after accreditation changes in 2020/21
90.131.37.154 (talk) 90.131.37.154 (talk) 15:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequate source
Talk:Urban adult contemporary

message: I decided to add material to the rhythmic oldies article after following a link from something else, not realizing what I was in for. At one point I wanted to refer to a different format targeting blacks (rhythmic oldies goes after blacks and whites). I thought I had found what I was looking for, but the format "urban oldies", a heading here, seems to refer to rhythmic oldies. 
I would like to see someone fix this, so "urban oldies" here refers to a black format. I believe "rhythmic", whether adult contemporary, top 40 or oldies, refers to a format targeting blacks and whites, while "urban", in any context, means black.Vchimpanzee (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

message: There have been a lot of incoherent edits lately (especially during May-August 2014). The article, especially the Summary section, was already a mess before that, with lots of grammatically incorrect sentences. I propose to revert the entire Summary section to some past version that was coherent. Please discuss any opinions here. -- HLachman (talk) 03:45, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a mess
Talk:MESUR

message: This should be turned into an article on the Mars Environmental Survey (MESUR) program that was planned. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 12:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: see Talk:MESUR/work 76.66.193.90 (talk) 09:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: article-ize
Talk:Tokyo Opera City Tower

message: I removed this anime reference as it's not very important for the subject
The Opera City Tower was featured in the Anime Series: Digimon Tamers where further into the Season, Yamaki and the Monster Makers among others, took refuge and erected a base of operations to defeat the D-Reaper.
--Apoc2400 (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed anime reference
Template talk:User linguist

message: Is this template really being considered for deletion?  I can't find it on the templates for deletion page at all. Djiann (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: Subj.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BPK (talk • contribs) 21:45, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for hobby-linguist template
Talk:Taxadiene synthase

message: Taxadiene synthase, the largest of terpene cyclases, is the enzyme catalyzes the rate-limiting step of toxoids biosynthesis. It can help to converts the geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) to taxa-4,11-diene, the starting compound of more than 500 kinds of taxanes in yew tree. Taxanes can help the plant to fight against the predation of animals, mechanical damage, and many other kinds scenarios that not good for its growth or development. Taxadiene synthase contains the conserved metal-binding motifs and requires Mg2+ for optimal catalytic activity, belongs to class I terpenoid cyclase.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.21.125 (talk) 04:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chermarn Boonyasak

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.bangkokpost.com/lifestyle/film/1404962/chermarn-boonyasak-raising-the-ring-finger. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Asartea Talk | Contribs 15:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Transistor tester

message: Measurements with the service type tester are relative rather than absolute.
I'm not clear what that means. go/ no go testers normally pass if a preset hfe is exceeded - so may fail some healthy trs. Sounds more absolute than relative to me anyway.
Tabby (talk) 21:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Erm

message: The final sentence before the references section reads:
  There are also testers for checking high transistor and rectifiers.
I'm guessing it should read ...checking high voltage transistors ..., but I don't know that with certainty. Would someone who knows please take a look at it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.109.138.40 (talk) 21:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo?
Talk:Rick Cesari

message: I tagged this article for a conflict of interest because the Bot picked it up, and the article's creator's name is simialr to the subject's.  Also, the cites need to be improved per WP:BLP. Bearian (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I'm leaving the COI tag because I now see that the creator has gone back in and added a lot more POV stuff.  Karanacs (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest.  In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
#editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
#participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
# linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
#:and you must always:
# avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest.  Thank you.  Bearian (talk) 23:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Black Lick Township, Pennsylvania

message: 99.32% white demographically?  Is there any wonder, being named Black Lick?  Yikes.  Does anyone know the history of the town's naming?  Keeper | 76 21:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Ambrosian hymns

message: Three months ago a POV tag was put on this page with no specifics except for the terse edit comment.  The POV tag in not to be removed without discussing the issue here first.  Shouldn't there be some discussion here?  
I agree slightly with the POV issue but think that putting up the tag without defining the issue is unfair.  It might have been better to have done some cleaning rather than put up the tag.
I only came to this article seeking information.  JimCubb (talk) 21:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken it down, having done a little editorial work to clarify the article. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:State Tower

message: Shouldn't the article mention, that this building is the sister-building of the famous Sathorn Unique Tower on the opposite side of the BTS line? They feature the similar architectural style and the latter would also have had a dome on the roof-top. It just was never finished. In the article about Sathorn Unique Tower the State-Tower is mentioned, so why not the other way round here? --2003:45:482D:7197:5C8B:BBF4:463D:86EF (talk) 23:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sathorn Unique Tower
Talk:Lower Egypt

message: Hi
It is normal to use abbreviations without explanation ONLY when they are either:
* Commonly used, or
* Have been already defined in previous text
In other words, "Blah Blah Rhubarb (BBR)", in the first use of BBR, and then one can use "BBR" after that - even then, it is advisable to redefine if there is a lot of text between first and second use ...Why? Because if that person is only interested in the information in one section, they should not have to read the whole article to find where the abbr. is defined.
One cannot simply start saying "BBR" in an article WITHOUT first defining the term, as no one would have a clue I meant "Blah Blah Rhubarb"
Here, we have "Pliny the Elder (N.H. 5.11)" - no one knows what N.H. 5.11 is.
Furthermore, there are no refs for the whole of that section - so there is NO WAY for anyone to find out what the hell that is.
I have had to search Google and Wikipedia to try and find out what this means, and after 20 minutes I am guessing it is meant to refer to Pliny's work, Natural_History_(Pliny)
Can someone confrim and amend please Chaosdruid (talk) 12:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pliny the Elder (N.H. 5.11)
Talk:Barry Beckett

message: Break this into topic headings and cite more.  I hate to say this but sometime an article just needs to 'look' better to keep it afloat.---Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 05:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know enough about the article's subject - that's the problem.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 06:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are several people in the picture, which one is Barry Beckett? Dornwald (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Barry Beckett in the picture?
Talk:AG Tower

message: I passed by to give an importance rating for WP Architecture. But why is there an article on this building? It is one of 79 similar tall buildings in Jumeirah Lake Towers, doesn't even make the List of tallest buildings in Dubai, has no independent references to demonstrate it has been noticed. Sionk (talk) 20:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Point-of-care testing

message: This article only shows benefits and not the disadvantages of POCT. Nobody will deny the benefits in certain situations (ambulant care, no laboratory, limited time, ITC), but all in all POTC is expensive and doesn’t match the quality (sensivity, spezifity) of common laboratory testing. --Polarlys (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Is it possible to draw up a section for history of major contributions and contributors to this form of medical testing? MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Large parts of this article duplicate content in the PDF
I don't know what to do about it. Also, please teach me the proper manner of reporting.
oldrider (talk) 16:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright violation? 

message: Statements of length of time need to be adjusted to reflect accurate dates. One sentence refers to the last decade as a metric of time, but it must be taken into consideration the future of the article. If people read this article in 20 years, the last decade will not be an accurate representation of what the article is referring to and will therefore be out of date. Ulrilee (talk) 18:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metrics of length of time will become outdated and inaccurate 

message: With a lot of focus on Point of Care testing that has come from the COVID-19 pandemic, this article needs to be reorganized, expanded, and more in-depth to better showcase POCT. The Multiplexed Point of Care testing page has a lot of good information that is broad enough that it should be included and expanded on in this article. All the prior points brought up above should be incorporated (neutrality, history, and metrics). Updated references are also needed seeing as POCT has advanced a lot in recent years which is not reflected in the current article. 
In addition this article on POCT should cover: 
* Detection methods & Assays
* Sample types & Biomarkers
* Metrics of importance & Challenges
* Ongoing research/Future Directions 
I plan on editing this over the course of the next few weeks.
LulieBella (talk) 16:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization and Updating
Talk:Aspidochelone

message: This is a duplicate of one section of this article, with some added modern references. Are they important? Whether or not, the whole thing could well be included here, with a section redirect. Let us merge. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Jasconius]]
Talk:Patient education

message: for WPMED I was going to rate this article "low" because the article currently only defines the term.  However, the topic has potential to reach "high" importance, if it addresses the history of patient education and theories concerning its purpose and, particularly, changing ideas about the role of the patient.  --Una Smith (talk) 04:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: I agree, patient education "has potential to reach "high" importance, if it addresses the history of patient education and theories concerning its purpose and, particularly, changing ideas about the role of the patient."  Current literature often addresses issues of health literacy; the use of technology, Internet, and social media to engage learners; and health coaching/motivational interviewing.  Here are a few examples: 
Gruman, J., Rovner, M. H., French, M. E., Jeffress, D., Sofaer, S., Shaller, D., et al. (2010). From patient education to patient engagement: Implications for the field of patient education. Patient Educ Couns, 78(3), 350-356.
The Joint Commission. (2010). Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence, and Patient- and Family-Centered Care:  A Roadmap for Hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission.  free from:  http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/87C00B33-FCD0-4D37-A4EB-21791FB3969C/0/ARoadmapforHospitalsfinalversion727.pdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PatientEd (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patient Education potentially of high importance 

message: — Assignment last updated by GhostRiter13 (talk) 15:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing and Literacy in the Digital Age

message: While examining this article, I was informed of extra training needed to continued with editing this article. Within the training, it stated that the sources used in citations must be within the past 5 years to ensure that the health information is accurate for readers and many of the citations I have seen through this article no longer fall within the 5 year limit. GhostRiter13 (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Suggestion of Updating Citations 

message: — Assignment last updated by ECM0815 (talk) 06:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technical Writing
Talk:The Material

message: Maybe this band needs to be under The Material (music) Shufelt (talk) 21:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't this page and The Material (band) be named differently to avoid confusion? I keep looking for this page, seeing the one with "(band)" in the search suggestions, and going there because usually the one without a qualifier is a disambiguation. ~Bobogoobo (talk) 02:36, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 
Talk:Tough Guys Don't Dance (film)

message: The facts sections quotes one box office total; the article text quotes another. Which one is correct? 147.219.164.213 (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the box? 

message: The redirect Oh Man! Oh God! Oh Man! Oh God! Oh Man! Oh God! Oh Man! Oh God! Oh Man! Oh God! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 05:56, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Oh Man! Oh God! Oh Man! Oh God! Oh Man! Oh God! Oh Man! Oh God! Oh Man! Oh God!]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:DosLynx

message: As a long time web developer, 10+ years, I think that simply having a version of a browser for a seperate operating system does not weigh importantly enough to warrant another page.  All the information relevant to DosLynx is already present on Lynx and the DosLynx information could be put as a note under Lynx quite easily.  - Flobi
:I agree ( rCX (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing 

message: Redirects don't need categories (and previous discussion agrees there's insufficient material to make this a regular topic) TEDickey (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories?
Talk:East Malling Stream

message: Start made.
I've made a start, but plenty to do still. Probably most urgent is the recent history of weir mill, it's house conversion and also the current state of the ford at Ditton. Mjroots (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Pittsford Central School District

message: I have felt it appropriate to remove the Controversy section, added by one SPA editor recently. Whilst I am sure there may be grounds for reinserting some relevant concerns based upon WP:RS in major news media, I feel there was far too much focus on minor stories and relatively trivial detail, based solely on reporting in local news outlets to allow this expansive and WP:UNDUE section to remain in place. Please use this talk page to gain consensus over what is and is not relevant to this article, and what reliable sources are most appropriate to use in this encyclopaedia entry. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Controversy Section
Talk:Daniel Bleichenbacher

message: Just a brief note that this article, by very rough calculations, was the 2,097,152nd article created, i.e. 2^21. Somewhat appropriate. Confusing Manifestation(Say hi!) 22:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for letting me know. :) --- tqbf 23:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled