lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Owen Magnetic

message: http://www.coachbuilt.com/bui/b/baker_raulang/baker_raulang.htm
Baker, Rauch & Lang built the Owen Magnetic after Walter C. Baker purchased the rights to Justus B. Entz's electromagnetic transmission in 1912.
http://pelorus.scriptmania.com/cars/owen.htm
Some vintage Owen Magnetic advertisements.
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z11546/Owen%20Magnetic_Model%20O-36/default.aspx
Information and several photos of an Owen Magnetic model O-36
4562894 <- A 1984 US Patent that references Owen Magnetic
http://edison.rutgers.edu/NamesSearch/glocpage.php3?gloc=HK211&
Legal Series -- Richard W. Kellow File: Patent Agreement with Entz (1889)
[HK211] 
These documents are from envelope 211. They consist of correspondence and agreements relating to Justus B. Entz, who was chief electrician of the Edison Machine Works from 1887 until 1890. The label on the envelope contains the following notation: "Patent Agreement March 15, 1889 Justus B. Entz and Thomas A Edison Royalty to be allowed Mr. Entz for use of certain patents." 
http://www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html
US Patent and Trademark Office Patent search site, if anyone can find Entz's patent numbers.
        
I searched Entz's patents and the three key patents for the magnetic transmission appear to be:
    732,062   filed:  1898  Power Transmission and Control  patent granted: 1903
  1,164,588   filed:  1908  Self Propelled Vehicle          patent granted: 1915
  1,207,732   filed:  1915  Motor Vehicle Control           patent granted: 1916
The electromagnetic double machine transmission in the Owen Magnetic car appears to be based on Entz patent 1,207,732, filed in 1915.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.200.163 (talk) 00:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: More info
Category talk:Robots

message: I had a bit of a problem finding this category.  I looked in both Category:Automation and Category:Engineering, but eventually I looked up Robot and found this category.  As I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, I thought instead of following WP:Bold I would make the suggestion in this talk page that this category be made a sub-category of one or more other categories listed at Wikipedia:Categorical index.  Please leave me your comments. WVhybrid 04:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I have answered my own question about how it all links:  Robots==>Robotics==>Electro mechanical engineering==>Engineering... Somehow this seems a bit awkward. WVhybrid 05:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category tree - connect the branches
Talk:M240 machine gun

message: I would propose this article should probably be merged with the existing article for this weapon system that already lists the different variants for countries that use it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_MAG
A separate article seems to make little sense. RLS 84 (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - but unfortunately this has been debated before, at great length, and a loud cabal of users refuse to accept that the M240 isn't a different, all-American gun.Fahrenheit666 (talk) 02:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That wasn't the reason given by most opposed editors at in the main merge discussion on this talk page. For most, it was space of coverage, which is greater for a variant article. Given the relatively large sizes of both articles, any merge would make the combined article much larger, and probably over the recommended 100 kb limit. It's better to keep them separate. BilCat (talk) 03:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens

message: Does anyone know the name for the song that plays in the movie at Asa Lavenders place? Is it originally composed for this movie? --Easyas12c 15:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Music in the film

message: While the information that was written here about this actress may have been interesting, even if it was sourced (which it wasn't at all), it still had nothing to do with this movie. Such info can only belong in her own article and arrived here simply because she currently has no article. Now, I have noticed her article was deleted in the past. I suppose it can be re-built, but only if anyone cares enough to find (reliable) sources for such information -Lwc4life 02:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: June Mack

message: I googled the words of the nazi song at the beginning of the movie. It is called "Sachsenmarsch der NSDAP" or "Deutschland Erwache", by Bruno Schestak. (I'm not a nazi, I wondered about it because I've never heard that one in any movie with nazis). --213.73.67.25 (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:University School of Milwaukee

message: Most of the people recently added flunk the notability test pretty badly. Over the history of this school which has shaped generations of Milwaukee's ruling class, surely there are many genuinely notable alumni not associated with soda companies or something or somebody (unidentified and unlinked) called "Rosetta Stone"! --Orange Mike 21:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Notable" Alumni? 

message: Claims such as "this school is the best in the state" and that the science wing is a "giant leap forward" MUST be legitimized by sources or they are not encyclopedic information and thus violate Wikipedia policy. These statements will be deleted until sources are used. For more information, please see WP:Peacock terms, WP:Weasel words, and WP:Neutral point of view. Bflorsheim (talk) 06:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The best," etc.
Talk:Børselva

message: I removed the parts about Kven history, which do not pertain to the subject at all. This is about a river, not a settlement.
In addition, the first part should actually go "Børselva (Kven: Pyssyjoki, Sami: Bissojohka)", not any other (Kven-centric) variant. This is Wikipedia convention, see for instance Sălaj County. Punkmorten 05:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Kettle Moraine High School

message: How many more sources do we need? -PBG
:A good FA-class school article has between 50 and 100. Youd need at least 10-20 for a solid B. Adam McCormick 05:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The official website stated that the school's boundary includes: "Delafield, Dousman, Eagle, Genesee, North Prairie, Ottawa, Sullivan, Summit, and Wales."
However the census Bureau's Waukesha County school district map indicates Eagle is not in the district, and the Jefferson County boundary indicates Sullivan is not in the district. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communities served
Talk:Big Top Pee-wee

message: More about the plot: one paragraph isn't much. Criticism and reviews could be added as well, to help the article out. I changed the class to start: as it leans that way, but it's a slow start...and needs a lot of work to improve another rating class. RobJ1981 20:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs expanding

message: The following is unsourced information:
*Big Top Pee-wee was Puerto Rican actor Benicio del Toro's first feature film. He played Duke the Dog-Faced Boy.
*Dustin Diamond plays one of the children transformed from the elderly after eating Pee-wee's cocktail wieners.
*Director Randal Kleiser makes an uncredited cameo appearance as a popcorn vendor selling Pee-wee's cocktail hot dogs.
*Paul Reubens' three minute screen kiss with Valeria Golino was at one point the longest kiss ever filmed, a record held until Kids in America's six minute screen kiss in 2005.
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 11:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material
Talk:National Center for Supercomputing Applications

message: While it's true that the timeline at NCSA says in 1992 "Black hole simulations support development of LIGO" (emphasis added by me), the official site makes it clear that LIGO was developed by CalTech and MIT, so I'm going to edit it to say "supporting". -Jacob 68.161.230.208 02:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LIGO

message: KarenAnn 16:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a caption for the photo? 

message: When I tried to follow (click on) the link to "Larry Smarr's testimony before US House of Representatives", it took [forwarded?] me to a page at "http://science.house.gov/" with no
explanation of what the problem [if any] was.  Mike Schwartz 00:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another bad link? 

message: Changed and improved the opening "History" paragraph. Actually, it should be rewritten to focus on the research (which is the reason NCSA exists), with less focus on the software that was released, although that seems to be what captured public attention. The other history sections also could stand modification, should someone with the knowledge also develop the inclination.  24.178.228.14 (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified History Section 

message: Added information about the program; formatted list into columns for a better reader experience. The link to Smarr's congressional testimony did not go there, and so was removed. 24.178.228.14 (talk) 22:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified Business Partners Section 

message: According to the website, Dr. William "Bill" Gropp is NCSA Director and Chief Scientist. I assume that replaces Ed Seidel?
207.229.172.191 (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Director?
Talk:Born in East L.A. (film)

message: :Goof: Jimmy said that Rudy got 48 people in at 10¢ a person and made $4.20. 48 x $0.10 is 4.80.
I disagree that this is a goof.  Throughout the film Jimmy is shorting Rudy on cash this way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.89.151.208 (talk) 20:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Imdb the picture of Jesus Christ in Rudy's home is actually that of Marin's former comedy partner Tommy Chong.
I'd have to watch the film again, but I don't think that was Chong. I could be wrong, though. (Sugar Bear 22:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: There is about 12 minutes of scenes removed from the DVD that had a significant impact on the ending of the movie. The deleted scenes start at the point that Rudy and his girlfriend were walking down the hill with hundreds of illegal aliens (legal term, not pejorative) running down the hill overwhelming the border patrol. It shows them being kidnapped, taken to the house across the street from his house. In the ensuing scene, the kidnappers are caught, the law enforcement guy lets Rudy go because he can provide proof of citizenship, but his gf has to be deported. So Rudy steals the vehicle, goes to a parade, and runs to his pastor friend on a float. He quickly marries Rudy and his gf, and when the law enforcement guy catches up, he says she's a legal resident because they are married. The scene then shifts to the scene of the chinese immigrants doing the "Wasss Sappenin'" scene with the cop on the street. 
Unfortunately, I cannot find any official proof of the deleted scenes but this link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QzwsIAJaVk) shows an unauthorized version of the deleted scenes. (As a side note, the deleted scenes were what put the icing on the cake of this movie; without it, the movie ending just fizzled with a lot of unresolved threads.) Michaelopolis (talk) 21:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scenes not in official DVD release (but seen in the original showing plus TV release showings)
Talk:Les Boys

message: This section seems highly dubious, and without any sources I think it deserves a massive rework, if not a removal. In fact a large portion of this article is purely speculative. Blackjackrobo (talk) 05:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   Film as part of Quebec culture Rework
Talk:The Brady Bunch Movie

message: The plot description here is clearly written by someone who mis-remembers the plot. For instance Mr. Dittmere isn't stealing the Brady mail, he is getting it accidentally. He only discovers the pending foreclosure on their house halfway through the movie; Cindy doesn't find out that he knows, she finds out about it when she overhears her parents. I am making changes. Midnightguinea 22:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Plot Inaccuracies

message: Maybe we should adjust the font and other styles of this page so it would look like a page straight out of the 70s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.214.185 (talk) 20:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: An Idea

message: As per the relevant guidelines at Template:Infobox film#Parameters, we don't usually include songwriters in the infobox. Given that, should we consider listing only the main composer in the infobox (in this case, it's Guy Moon)? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's what the template says. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:46, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composers in infobox
Talk:Kids in the Hall: Brain Candy

message: The direct comparison would be to Glenn Danzig Grivo went by one name, Glenn Danzig performed with a band as simply Danzig. The melancholy nature of Grivo can be compared to Danzig's (the man) persona, the style of dress and even the way of speaking is an almost obvious parody of Glenn Danzig, when watching the movie I was personally never under the assumption that it was a parody of anyone else. - 209.248.175.82 13:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, I came to the talk page to say the same thing. Clearly a Danzig parody. --68.149.181.145 (talk) 01:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grivo based on Axel Rose? try Glenn Danzig 
Talk:Kotiya

message: The article asserts without qualification that using to Kotiya to mean tiger is incorrect and doesn't give any opposing views. I don't know enough to tell if it is biased toward a particular viewpoint as it's currently written. The topic sounds interesting though, since it touches on biology, linguistics, and politics. Wmahan. 06:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV issues

message: Go ahead, it's about the same species. We were very lucky to see this cat in Yala jimfbleak 05:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Brain Donors

message: I've deleted the Quotes section, as I believe it's unencyclopedic (this isn't a fan site, nor is it IMDB) and the formatting of the section is atrocious.  If there is a legitimate reason to include this info, feel free to replace it. Bear in mind that there have been several edits since then, and simply reverting the page will undo those edits.  Canonblack 18:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes? 

message: The site lists this as a box office bomb, but I was under the impression that it was never released to theaters in the first place. Is any more specific information available about the release? Chubbles1212 09:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It most definitely was released in theaters. I saw it with a group of friends. One of them had been a classmate of John Turturro's at SUNY New Paltz, and spent most of the movie softly muttering, "I am so jealous." WaxTadpole (talk) 18:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: BOB?
Template talk:Final warning

message: This template has a parameter but I'm not sure what it's used for.  Could someone please write-up a usage note?  Thanks.  Rossami (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's so you can add freeform text to the end of the warning.  --Chris (talk) 00:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Buck Privates

message: I found :Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg]]

message: :Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg

message: I found this in the trivia section:
* The film contains technology that is years ahead of its time. Portable radios did not exist until 1954 with the arrival of the transistor radio.
Of course there were portable radios during WW2, They were necessarily tube portable radios.-Dhodges 14:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  trivia
Talk:Active Duty (web site)

message: Does this *really* need to listed in :Category:Military of the United States?--KrossTalk 06:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Belle's Magical World

message: Removed Plot section which was copied straight from the dvd which is why it sounds like an advert.  -- Whpq 01:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How come the Prince is still in beast form? 68.164.88.227 03:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Beast 

message: The image clearly says Beauty and the Beast: Belle's Magical World similar to the full title of the previous release, Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: In the paragraph talking about the part "A perfect world", the word 'drought' is used when speaking of how the others in the room were cold. This is the wrong word to have here, as a drought is a lack of rain, not a cold breeze. I believe the word they were looking for was draught or perhaps draft. Thus, instead of this:
During the meal, while Belle explains a story she has been reading to the Beast, the Beast gets sweaty and demands that the windows be opened, despite there being a drought and the other servants getting cold.
The sentence should read either
'''
During the meal, while Belle explains a story she has been reading to the Beast, the Beast gets sweaty and demands that the windows be opened, despite there being a draught and the other servants getting cold.'''
or 
During the meal, while Belle explains a story she has been reading to the Beast, the Beast gets sweaty and demands that the windows be opened, despite there being a draft and the other servants getting cold.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.124.143 (talk) 11:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to be made
Talk:Among the Barons

message: Vandalism and removing of content had gone on unnoticed for three weeks on this article. Be vigilant, Wikipedians!!!
Gryffon 05:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Be on Vandal lookout!!!
Template talk:Canvass

message: What does the parameter in this template do?  Rossami (talk) 06:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe there is a parameter in this template, is there? — WCityMike (talk • contribs) 16:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The reason I used the adjective "aggressive" in the wording is because the ArbCom has specifically stated, per the cite right there in the template, that cross-posting in and of itself is acceptable.  But aggressive cross-posting — their wording — is not acceptable.  Therefore, this template should not warn users for performing an action that the ArbCom has specifically deemed acceptable. — Mike • 23:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aggressive" 

message: This warning is too long and too much like Wikilawyering. It needs to be severly trimmed down and all of the legalese stripped out of it. 
The wording should be the equivalent of a, "policy in a nutshell" with a link to the finer details of Arbcom cases and the like. As well the wording with the graphic that this template currently has is like a "FINAL WARNING BEFORE BLOCK" message and for this type of behavior such a warning is not generally needed. The usual folks doing this type of thing just aren't aware that there exists internal spamming guidelines and as such this should just be a tool to highlight those guidelines to encourage folks to stop what they are doing. Netscott 23:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much legalese/too '''agressive'''