lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:System camera

message: Who decided that the Nikon F was "the first true system camera"?  The Leicas ii/iii/M are certainly "system cameras" and were in production several decades before the Nikon F.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.12.74 (talk) 11:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

message: "The Nikon F (1959) is normally regarded as the first true system camera." Isn't that wrong and the first 35-mm SLR in Production, the Ihagee Kine Exakta (Germany) was the first System-SLR? That camera was in production from 1936 to 1940, thus predating the Nikon-F several years. @Egil: What makes you think of the Nikon-F as a more "true" system camera than others? IOOI (talk) 14:11, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree that first is probably not entirely right, but it depends on what the definition of a true system camera is. The F system I would assume is the by far most extensive, longest living (from 1959 to date, i.e more than 50 years), and for many, it defined the system camera concept.  -- Egil (talk) 11:51, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

text: I agree with IOOI.  It would seem that the choice of Nikon has more to do with its reputation in the West than any first.  There was also the Leica, of course: we're not talking about SLRs here.  And in my recollection the Exakta had a much more extensive set of accessories than the Nikon.  But that's just as irrelevant as the longevity.  First is first, not longest-lived.  I'm modifying the text to show that the Nikon was one of the first.   Groogle (talk) 03:23, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nikon F as first system camera claim 

message: I ended up making more changes than planned.  The more I looked at it, the more it looked like a page about the Nikon F.  I've added references to Leica and Exakta, and also removed the external references, neither of which looked relevant to the topic.  Groogle (talk) 05:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bringing up to date
Talk:Hälsingland Rune Inscription 21

message: Does this make sense to anyone? ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 04:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Hillersjö stone

message: This article should be renamed since the inscription is on bedrock and not on stone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.18.69 (talk) 11:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Napoleonville, Louisiana

message: According to the interview on the German DVD version Napoleonville was the location for the filming of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Gathering_of_Old_Men" after Ernest J. Gaines's novel. [Ulizinho, 8-7-2009]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.54.210.214 (talk) 21:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film location 

message: In this text is written the unsourced statement "The town was named by a soldier who served under Napoleon Bonaparte. The soldier is buried in the nearby town of Plattenville in the Cemetery of Our Lady of the Assumption Catholic Church located on Hwy 308 south.", whereas in the German Wikipedia (article about the parish) is written the equally unsourced statement that it was "benannt nach J. L. Napoleon, einem hier ansässigen Plantagenbesitzer" (="named for J.L. Napoleon, a local plantation owner"). 
Who's right? ThomasPusch (talk) 14:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Comparative economic systems

message: User:Hanju Bae 
1. First of all, we think your article is really organized (Dividing such a study by timeline)and cover blanced views. 
2. We think it can be added some sources to increase the reliability of this topic. (subsections : During the Cold War and After 1989) Plus, we think that you can add some words about before the cold war, when Economical Reformation was first tried in soviet unions and eastern european countries.(1960s)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanju Bae (talk • contribs) 03:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanju Bae Group's Peer review
Talk:Pluralism in economics

message: I have just reverted Watchdog07's proposed changes, pending discussion and  consensus.  WP:CON states, "Consensus is Wikipedia's fundamental model for editorial decision-making."
Watchdog07 is mistaken about what the consensus view is here.  Please see what Haemo and I worked out on 8-9 June (above): 
*"ICAPE, the AHE, the PAE, and the IWGVT are in, while URPE and others are yet to be verified as specifically part of the movement for pluralism"
*the sentence on COPE should read:  "Critique of Political Economy, a more broadly-focused "critical-pluralistic" interdisciplinary journal, is a project of the IWGVT." 
Watchdog07's changes seem highly  non-neutral to me.  In any case, there is as yet no  consensus that they should be made.  Please let's discuss and arrive at  consensus before making any major changes to the article. andrew-the-k 00:07, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is what we agreed on, but I wouldn't call it consensus, since the only other editor closely involved in this page, Watchdog07, stated that he was taking a WikiBreak.  So, I guess we really have to just re-open this discussion — I urge everyone to just stay cool, be civil, and make their case below.  --Haemo 04:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting pending discussion and [[WP:CON | consensus]]
Talk:Scalping (disambiguation)

message: Anyone care to add a brief article on what lawn scalping is?  I've heard of it but don't know anything about it so I cannot write the article myself.  Karen 21:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawn Scalping? 

message: Why isn't there any mention of the term "scalping" as used in the mining industry?  They use that term to describe the operation of removing the overburden from an open-pit mine. 67.170.215.166 (talk) 10:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quarry scalping
Talk:EMC Symmetrix

message: I think something should be noted that while the DMX-3 can have up to 512 GB of cache, all cache in DMX-3 is mirrored, so the effective cache size is only 256 GB.
Tster123 21:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comments

message: DMX 4 is release. With 4 GB of Back end bus.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.73.14.62 (talk) 04:51, August 28, 2007 (UTC) 
It would be useful to me if we included the date when a particular device was announced, and also the date when it was (or will be) removed from support. How do others feel about collecting and maintaining such data? Bstark 15301 (talk) 16:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DMX 4 

message: Disclosure - Submitted by an Employee of NetApp who is a competitor of EMC.
I have been told that additions of new engines requires a power down of the whole VMAX array. This was based on personal communication from an ex EMC employee. While this doesn't have publicly verifiable information, neither does the assertion "Online system upgrades are achieved by adding single or multiple VMAX Engines...".
I would suggest that the word "Online" be struck from the sentence
On a secondary note, It would appear that many of the assertions on this page are not backed by externally verifiable references.
Martinjoz (talk) 00:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible inaccuracy in the statement regarding VMAX online upgrades 

message: Indeed, to echo above, it seems with this change an anonymous user gave all different values for "production years". I would guess these should be ranges anyway, since products are usually produced for more than one. Since this was never sourced, perhaps they should just be removed? W Nowicki (talk) 23:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing
Talk:Respect is Earned (2007)

message: I realize this was not a live event but no one other than those who went to the event have seen it. It is airing on PPV for the first time today later tonight. Last I knew wikipedia was not a spoiler site. For the next ROH ppv which still has no name they have also already spoiled the event on it's wiki page. In the future would it not be better to enforce waiting till the event airs? UnknownToaster 22:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers are not good

message: Does anyone have the attendence from the show? Rypcord 12:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unofficial, but it should be around 3K. The Manhattan Center holds about 3K people and ROH said at the event that it was sold out. TJ Spyke 22:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attendence

message: Should this article use an ROH prefix? The name of the PPV is simply Respect is Earned and there is no disambiguation issues. I know there seems to be some usage of the company name followed by the PPV, however this is not consistant as displayed by SummerSlam and WrestleMania. –– Lid(Talk) 14:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a big deal to me either way, I just think that it looks better with the ROH initials. TJ Spyke 22:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Does anyone think it would be beneficial to denote which matches aired on pay-per-view and which were not televised? WikiFew 02:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Non-televised matches are considered dark matches, and they are already marked from what I can see. Lrrr IV 06:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PPV Matches vs Event Matches 
Talk:Phycobilin

message: The bile article claims that phycobilin is a component of vertebrate bile.  Yet this article has only a passing mention of bile (jaundiced infants). Something seems missing (or wrong).  All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 16:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phycobilin in bile 

message: In the part that says that light reaching deeper waters is mostly green. To clarify. I still don't really know if it is a physical phenomena, or something that happens because the rest of the light is absorbed by the rest...
--186.136.240.135 (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for the evolutionary explanation
Talk:Danish Runic Inscription 66

message: OK, it's sourced, but; why does everybody say that about everything 'fearsome' depicted in every ancient culture? It seems so daft to me. Today, aren't there people who use "demonic" symbolism because it 'looks cool', is ferocious makes them feel tough and 'hardcore'? Could people have changed their motivations that much? Evolution hasn't changed us at all since then. In the far future, are people going to look at pictures of how modern "goth" culture dressed or heavy metal album covers and say "they probably did this to scare off evil spirits"...?? Come on, these were the same people who spawned the vikings! Isn't it more likely they wanted to "be" the evil spirits? 67.5.156.165 (talk) 08:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hehe, yeah, that's an interesting point. Haukur (talk) 08:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "probably intended to be protection against evil spirits." 

message: I'm not sure the translation is correct calling him their "partner". This sounds a bit like they had a romance going on. Since this is meant as a business partner where they would likely have travelled together for trading/raiding, maybe just translate it to "companion"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.241.128.189 (talk) 21:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "partner"
Talk:Central Police Station, Bristol

message: This article needs some checking: 
*The reference appears to point to a completely different building.
*I have found a source saying the building is no longer in use as a police station : 
*From memory, I believe it is this building , however I cannot be sure, could someone please confirm or correct
guiltyspark 09:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks I've corrected the ref & added a note about it closing as a police station.— Rod talk 21:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ashton upon Mersey

message: I have for the second time now reverted a list of local pubs, shops, pizza parlours et al. Perhaps whoever thinks that a list of local retail outlets is notable might instead like to think about adding some encyclopedic information about what's notable about the village? ---- Eric 21:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting

message: Would the editor(s) who has/have repeatedly changed this article to deny that Ashton upon Mersey is a part of Sale, or was ever in Cheshire, care to discuss his/her/their reasoning here instead of engaging in a fruitless revert war? --Malleus Fatuarum 16:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ashton upon Mersey is not a part of Sale
Talk:2007 Kentucky Derby

message: Does "Gene Simmons, Star Jones, Jenny McCarthy, and Melissa Joan Hart were also in Louisville for the 133rd race.[2]" really have any encyclopedic value? I can understand that the Queen of England deserves a mention in this context, but the other ones? Malc82 01:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO, this has no encyclopedic value at all.  Celebrities come to the Derby every year.  The Queen's visit is historic, so that must be included. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I checked the history and see it now - it was a result of undisclosed vandalism. I am reverting it. Okino 14:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Celebreties mentioned
Talk:Orthocarbonic acid

message: I did some digging, and Google doesn't return any results for "Hitler's acid" acid until 2016. The first usage was on a Russian education/pop sci website in a listicle about space factoids, referencing a then-recent computational chem paper (DOI: 10.1038/srep32486) that claimed orthocarbonic acid could possibly form deep in Uranus or Neptune. I can post the link to the listicle but I'm not sure if it'll get flagged as spam since it's a .ru domain and I don't have a Wikipedia account. There is no publication date or author on the website, but Google has it dated Jan. 20, 2016.
Scifinder didn't return any results for "Hitler's acid" when I searched, but it did return 143 results for "orthocarbonic acid." It looks like the name just spontaneously emerged one day and gets circulated periodically as a pop science factoid. I'm removing the alternate name because nobody has ever seriously used it. The German Wikipedia page for this molecule has removed the ball-and-stick model render as well. 172.126.55.24 (talk) 21:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Project Osprey (talk) 12:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is there still a name "Nazitic Acid"? 11char11 (talk) 04:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of alternate name "Hitler's acid" 

message: I wanted to add a reference for an experimental synthesis of calcium orthocarbonate, but the reference contains an error and I cannot resolve it. Please help. Olthe3rd1 (talk) 02:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference error
Talk:Substrate-level phosphorylation

message: The above definition is being corrected, as according to my Biochemistry Professor on my last exam, a word for word definition of "substrate level phosphorylation" quoting the above is a completely erroneous answer.
I got a zero on that 10 point question, so if the author of the above definition would like to contest this incorrect definition with my professor, please do so.  According to my professor, the correct definition of "substrate level phosphorylation" is the creation of ATP during metabolism not involving oxidative phosphorylation or ATP synthase.  It is the opposite of respiration phosphorylation.'''
df  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.235.156 (talk) 01:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed this at 11:45am AEST and added it to talk page on behalf of posting user. Is worth researching.--Brynic 01:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An article is not a place for venting frustration with your biochem exam. If you question the verifiability of the definition, then discuss it on the talk page. I am not familiar with the rules, but your edit probably counts as vandalism--Chibibrain (talk) 19:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Official definition
Talk:Balle (runemaster)

message: Is the gallery section really necessary? ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 02:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery
Talk:Fot

message: Which is the proper normalization? I don't find reference to either being used as a name, but Fótr seems more reasonable, being an existing word. The original copy being in runes allows for the dropping of length even in romanizations, so that without explicit mention or other instances of the name to go by one can't be entirely sure. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fotr or fótr? 
Talk:Arabic-English loanwords

message: There is already a good article on this subject. But rather than putting a redirect on immediately after some hard work has been done to put this here, I thought we could have a discussion first. We'll need to check is there any words here that are not at list of English words of Arabic origin. Drmaik 05:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment. Sorry I didn't check whether it was a redirect. Drmaik 05:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and that brings another point: the two pages are essentially the same. --Martian.knight 05:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, which two pages? Drmaik 06:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was suggesting that Arabic-English loanwords looks like it was created without the author searching for similar articles, from whence they would have found List of Arabic loanwords in English. --Martian.knight 00:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Thanks Martian for going through the list. However, 'risk' seem to be from Greek not Arabic , mulatto is controversial, but could be put in the relevant section, 'race' seems to me to be even less likely (but it has been claimed), talisman seems to be a blend of the Arabic loan from Greek and the Greek itself , while sugar has defintely come to use through Arabic (ultiamltely from Sanskrit) . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drmaik (talk • contribs) 06:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for looking at etymology, I simply wished to outline discrepancies. I do not know the policy for reaching an agreement on these things, but support the transfer of words that belong in List of Arabic loanwords in English. --Martian.knight 00:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  which words should be introduced 

message: Is this going to just sit here and stagnate or will it be merged? It appears that merging is the logical choice. --Martian.knight 09:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: we're meant to wait 5 days for consensus: that's tomorrow. I probably won't be online...Drmaik 14:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About that merge...
Talk:Oregon Caves Chateau

message: Hiya, I moved the article based on Google hits (1,430 for OCC vs. 274 for CAOC), and the listings at the NRHP and NPS, but I'm not attached. I'm curious in what way the designation "Oregon Caves Chateau" is incorrect. Wikipedia naming conventions are flexible, but I'm thinking a person would be more likely to search for Oregon Caves Chateau vs. The Chateau at Oregon Caves per Wikipedia:Naming conventions, specifically: Generally, article naming should prefer to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.
This is justified by the following principle:
    Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists. Thoughts? P.S. Thanks for creating the article! Katr67 23:02, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article

message: I forgot that CCC mostly deals with landscapes and shelters, not buildings...so was the WPA involved with the Chateau at all? There's a lot of overlap. Katr67 23:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCC vs. WPA
Talk:Shir LaShalom

message: Shouldn't it be "Shir L'Shalom"? --Davecampbell (talk) 02:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song and Article Name 

message: "Despite it is hard to question the general message of the lyrics, the Israeli society is divided about it. Many from the Israeli right claimed that it had been improper to use this song for propaganda during the first Lebanon war because of its anti-war lyrics. Religious groups have been saying that parts of the lyrics ("The purest of prayers will not bring us back" or "don't whisper a prayer") were contradicting to their ideology."
This paragraph is not yet in English. Could someone who knows what it means help? Stikko (talk) 16:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception in the Israeli society 

message: I wanted to de-stub this page, so I've expanded it using material translated from the corresponding Hebrew Wikipedia page.
Shellyph (talk) 02:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Edit
Talk:HAT-P-2b

message: Two significant planets were announced within a day or two of each other.  This is worth noting.  I inititally mistook them for the same discovery, and I doubt I am the only one.
Also the HAT-P tag is a new development, as is Corot-exo.  Making an apparent link between very different planets.  We can condfidently expect a lot more, at least from COROT, at which point it might be worth doing a page or three about discovery methods. --GwydionM 21:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why cross-reference?

message: If it's about 8 Jupiter's radius and is very closer than it's parent star, how it could be just 1.18 Jupiter's radius? It should be much larger.
And it don't sound reasonable for a planet with an orbital distance between Mercury and Mars orbit it's star in just 5 days and 15 hours. It's a large path to travel in so few time. With that velocity the planet would escape the system.
Victorwss 20:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like some data were mixed with Corot-exo-1b data. Victorwss 21:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The data doesn't looks right 