Talk:Konstantinos Plevris

message: Well, I finally got a hold of the book (well, actually I did that quite a while ago but I haven't bothered with Wikipedia in a while -- not to mention that investigating a 1,397 page book takes time) "The Jews: The Whole Truth" (Οι Εβραίοι - Όλη Η Αλήθεια, εκδοσεις Ήλεκτρον, 2006) in the first publication.  I examined the pages cited to make it look like Plevris was a "genocidal maniac" and it turns out that everything I stated was correct: excerpts were completely taken out of context and excerpts by long-dead individuals were intentionally attributed to Plevris by those ideologically opposed to Plevris (I mean in the real world but the same happened here on Wikipedia, too).  I will include this information when I edit the entry on Plevris.  
Given these facts, I highly recommend we entirely clean-up the sections regarding the book "Jews: The Whole Truth" by: a) removing all propagandistic references, b) creating a small summary of events (like the other lawsuit sections), and c) refrain from including inflammatory remarks.  
After all, this event is a very small chapter in the life of Konstantinos Plevris so why does it take up so much space?  There are more significant events in his life that are far more deserving of such length.  On that note, why would anyone remove the information on his "Education and academic background"?  He is an author and intellectual (whether one fully agrees with him, partially agrees/partially disagrees with him, fully disagrees with him, or doesn't know his social, historical, and political views to able to reach such a conclusion) so this is extremely important.  Also, Plevris is not a right-winger, let alone part of the "far-right" (which is actually a non-neutral and pejorative term).  His views have always been radical-revolutionary nationalist.  If you are basing your "opinion" of his ideological views on the same sources that intentionally took him out of context, I highly suggest that you do some independent study on him and you'll quickly notice that he opposes both the left and right and his views fall outside of the right-left political spectrum.
Anyway, if someone really wants me to check up on a certain page that supposedly says "so-and-so" I can do it but I cannot spend all of my time translating passages from a huge tome so please limit the pages (and also don't expect my translations to happen overnight).  Luckily, there are only a few "controversial" passages (as far as I can tell) and I went over most of those allegations in my edit. Also, as one of the posts here shows, I am not the only one who has consulted this book so I hope others will come out so that all doubt is removed.  That said, if you don't believe my translations, please go to a library in Greece, request the book, and look it up for yourselves.  (Believe me, it would save us all a lot of time if someone had done this years ago.)  Either that or buy or borrow a copy.  My contributions speak for themselves, however, so no one should feel suspect of my "motives" or neutrality (but, given the subject matter, anything that isn't anti-Plevris is often regarded as not being neutral by some individuals).  That said, if I've missed anything in my translations, please let me know, of course. Hopefully, we will now finally begin to "resolve" the anti-Plevris allegations.
By the way, some of the original links (from more than one source, I believe) don't work anymore (as years have passed) or point to the wrong URL so I've put up the date when they did work (as is common to do on Wikipedia).  In addition, Internet Archive can probably be used to view them. Critias (talk) 09:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is THIS court verdict "anti-Plevris propaganda"? Time to clean up the whole entry from the neo-Nazi trolls that came to save Plevris' reputation... BTW, the verdict quoted in the article accepts that it is PROVEN that Plevris is a fascist, a collaborator of various secret services INCLUDING the CIA, a liaison (at least) with various Italian and European neo-fascist terrorist groups and quite proud of it. Perhaps Plevris should also tell us what his father did during the Axis Occupation of Greece...Elp gr (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Since the time that no evidence has ever proven them to be unreliable. Unlike the neo-nazi you favor.Elp gr (talk) 07:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims of anti-Plevris (and anti-nazi) propaganda

message: TRhe book , in the list, "Ας μιλήσουμε για την ψωλ...ρα μάνα μου", is don't exist.K.plevris never wrote such a book.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.129.183.12 (talk) 16:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He should have. Elp gr (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  list of books of k. plevris 

message: Is there ANY proof of that? I've searched this university's website time and again, but I found no reference to Plevris' name AT ALL. Nada. Zip. Nothing. And universities have a tendency to LIST their honorary professors... If there's proof of him actually BEING an honorary professor at ANY university, I want to see it. Otherwise, it has no place in Wikipedia; and if Plevris can't prove his claim, I guess I can't say he's telling the truth. Elp gr (talk) 00:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not the way science works. No one's word is taken at face value, whether you like it or not. When one claims to be a professor (honorary or regular), his/her status must be verifiable. And Wikipedia, whether  you Greek nationalists like it or not, demands verifiability. Plevris claims to be a historian. Where are his scientific credentials then? Any publications? Any BibTeX entries? Any entries in Google Scholar? Anything in CiteseerX? In ScienceDirect? In certified bibliography resources for History and Archaeology? Show them. Plevris and his fanboys claim he's a scientist. Wikipedia and its community demands proof. If you don't like this policy, go troll elsewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.66.186.190 (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Honorary professor at the Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara?

message: It was inccorectly linking to greek island Ios but article means a newspaper column  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.64.222.102 (talk) 23:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Ios'' Link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Konstantinos Plevris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007205846/http://www.elkosmos.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=607&Itemid=0 to http://www.elkosmos.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=607&Itemid=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007205846/http://www.elkosmos.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=607&Itemid=0 to http://www.elkosmos.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=607&Itemid=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007210039/http://www.elkosmos.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=596&Itemid=52 to http://www.elkosmos.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=596&Itemid=52
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007205502/http://elkosmos.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=702&Itemid=1 to http://elkosmos.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=702&Itemid=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As far as I know, the aforementioned title does not imply one works or worked for the Greek Supreme Court. It only means that the lawyer is entitled in bringing cases before this Supreme Court. Therefore, if the phrase is a Greek attorney of law of the Greek Supreme Court means—I'm not a native English speaker—that Plevris works or worked for the Supreme Court then it is incorrect and should be changed to something like is a Supreme Court lawyer.  — Orgyn (talk) 15:33, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Δικηγόρος ''παρ' Αρείῳ Πάγῳ'' 

message: here he is quoted as saying " "though I like you, you have started to annoy me and you will feel what fascism means, because as you know I have declared that I am a fascist". In an interview he said "I am a fascist though I do not have a swastika in my hand." which seems to relate to his opposition to the methods of Golden Dawn. His article on the Greek Wikipedia, which oddly isn't linked to this one, states it also. Doug Weller talk 12:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-declared fascist 

message: "On October 31, 2011, he was convicted of racketeering under the anti-racist law and sentenced to six months imprisonment with a three-year suspension on the grounds of insulting Andreja Gilbert (a member of the Greek Pride of the Helsinki Monitor , representative of Athens Pride ) on July 16, 2008. In particular, Plevris was convicted because, referring to Andrea Gilbert, she described her as an "antisocial element" and "blatantly representing women's homosexuals, that is to say, a psychoanalysis of a perverse opou, which he does not respect the feminine nature not respects and truth". Doug Weller talk 13:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the Greek article, another conviction 

message: It is significantly richer, in particular the part about his political activities, including the Junta. 
https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9A%CF%89%CE%BD%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B1%CE%BD%CF%84%CE%AF%CE%BD%CE%BF%CF%82_%CE%A0%CE%BB%CE%B5%CF%8D%CF%81%CE%B7%CF%82#%CE%A0%CE%BF%CE%BB%CE%B9%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE_%CE%B4%CF%81%CE%AC%CF%83%CE%B7  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greece666 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek wikipedia article