Talk:Faisal Gill

message: Instead of getting into a revert war on this page, if someone feels that a section isn't factual, appropriate or otherwise worthy of being on this page we can discuss this.  Don't just delete sections because it doesn't necessarily serve the interests of the Faisal Gill campaign.  This is not a campaign website, but an encyclopedia entry which should provide balanced information from a neutral point of view.
OK, so everything is now properly references with newpaper articles.  Is that in your opinion sufficient?  Gletiecq 18:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Actually this guy was involved in something that got national attention, and probably merits an article.  But can someone put an end to the vandalism?  71.114.108.244 03:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gill's involvement as a senior advisor to the Steve Chapman for Delegate campaign is absolutely relevant as it's part of his political resume, albeit not a bright spot.  Chapman filed with the State Board of Elections, filed campaign finance reports, held political events and distributed campaign materials, so he clearly did run.  If we're going to include biographical information on Gill's other activities, it's worthwhile to include articles in newspapers where he is quoted as representing the Chapman campaign and discussing his own activities on Chapman's behalf.  It's interesting to note that your company hosts Faisal Gill's campaign website and that you're conducting campaign activities on Faisal Gill's behalf, but you apparently are a disinterested observer here.  This is outrageous.Gletiecq 00:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Visiting via WP:COI: I think the references need more balance. Currently, three are from Fox News (generally pro-Republican) and one is from a neocon online magazine . Tearlach 15:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: As posted in the Faisal Gill section on the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard:
" seems to be the defendant in a suit filed by one of the clients of Faisal Gill's law firm.  Gletiecq wanted a section about that client's 2006 campaign, allegedly derailed in part by Gletiecq's blog, in the article.  Alleging COI (while neglecting to disclose his own COI) Gletiecq reported the user who removed it.
" was another SPA with related issues, which he explained in a post to Dar-Ape, about blog content (guess whose blog) repeatedly being added to this BLP article.   — Athænara </font>  ✉  04:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicts of interest

message: I am restoring some of the deleted reference to Abduraman Alamoudi, since without it the "Faisal Gill Affair" makes no sense whatsoever.  That was the central theme to the entire issue, and removing that reference is clearly not NPOV.  Similarly, referring to Frank Gaffney as an "anti-Muslim activist" is purely subjective, and not NPOV.  Gletiecq 20:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring Content from More reverts 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Faisal Gill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061016175656/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,128743,00.html to http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,128743,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified