lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Prayer for the dead

message: These are just some suggestions.
* Add prayer for the dead in other, additional religions.
* Add headings and subheadings, and if needed clean up the organization.
Wesley 17:04, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good point.  Where is it suggested he was departed at the time of the writing of this epistle? 68.116.112.45 (talk) 23:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All references to Onesiphorus are in the past tense: gave, came, found, searched... If he were still alive why pray mercy on his family instead of for he himself? Mannanan51 (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

text: I also think it would appropiate to add information about the Catholic tradition of praying the Rosary during nine days after the person's death. --189.247.197.226 (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TODO 

message: This is a terrible, terrible article. I removed an advert for a funeral service and noticed that many of the claimed references are to questionable websites. Many sections are free of references. Some refs are not even in English - this is English Wikipedia. And overall, a mess. It is so bad, I do not even know how to fix it, but must tag it. This type of item just makes Wikipedia look bad. Might as well reduce it to 4 or 5 short and correct paragraphs instead of this chaos. History2007 (talk) 22:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead article?

message: Kaddish is not a "Prayer for the dead". It is said in virtually every Jewish service, often many times, and is therefore part of a funeral service. It is roughly equivalent to the Christian "Magnificat", and as the name implies, it is simply a praise of God. There are some variations of Kaddish, depending on the occasion and depending on the congregation (Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Mizrachi etc).Historygypsy (talk) 13:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Misnomer

message: The alphabetical order causes a very small religion called Baha'i to appear on top; it has only 5 to 8 milion adherents, doesn't seem particularly relevant to me; maybe better to put that Baha'i among "other religions"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FreieFF (talk • contribs) 15:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why alphabetical order? 

message: Even thought Taoism is large enough to not be inserted into the "other religions," there is still little information about it's customs and relationship with death. Would it be ok for me to add on a bit more information, I will put any information I consider inserting here before actually editing the article itself. 44HB.SS44 (talk) 04:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little focus on Taoism 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jad Mada (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions
Talk:Wendover

message: I spoke to the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies today, and they confirmed the town status of Wendover.  It is definitely a town rather than a village, they provided a couple of strong references stating it as such as well as offering the definitive definition of a town in the United Kingdom.  Wendover has had royal charter to hold a weekly market since 1464: something that defines this place as a town, and that is something that will be going into the article in a sec.
The two references were Sheehan's History and Topography of Buckinghamshire (1960), and the Kelly's Directory or Buckinghamshire (1939).  An online reference is genuki (which features the word TOWN in big letters).
Also Wendover was formerly a borough with a Borough Council (or so they told me).
-- Graham  ☺ | Talk 17:17, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town Status 

message: David Lidington is no longer the MP - he retired at the time of the 2019 election, and did not contest the seat. At the 2019 election Rob Butler (also Conservative) was elected  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.174.141 (talk) 15:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MP has changed 

message: I refer to the opening section on the talk page. Wendover is a town. The  edit to the article removed the source. If you read the source, it explains why your edits have been reverted. 92.40.26.2 (talk) 21:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because an office study and two books call it a town don't make it officially a town. So feel free to discuss before engaging in Wikipedia:Edit warring. DragonofBatley (talk) 22:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wendover is a town
Talk:Occipital bone

message: What other bones does the occipital bone articulate with? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.110.134.110 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 10 November 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi ! The occipital bone articulates with the paired parietal bones and the temporal bone. Bibeyjj (talk) 16:06, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articulations 

message: I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:
* There is no need for the information on ossification to be hidden away on a separate article. This means the information is not presented as it could be, and it is needlessly fragmented.
* It is standard on Anatomy pages, and recommended in WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy, for 'Development' sections to be displayed on the same page. 
* Additionally, this page is small and it would give more context to have the information displayed in a central location, rather than hidden on a separate article. 
* If necessary, the article on ossification could be expanded at a later date. LT910001 (talk) 07:18, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Ossification of occipital bone]] 

message: Why is this seperate form the occiput article? Yes, occiput is more general and less scientific, but the subject here certainly falls within that. FunkMonk (talk) 01:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with occiput
Talk:Barn owl

message: As was discussed at the bird project, but not brought up here for some reason, some subspecies have been split off into an eastern barn owl species. It would seem this article needs some reworking, so pinging the FA nominator , and  who brought it up. FunkMonk (talk) 09:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Had a look at this again for the FAR list. It would still seem some updates about this split are warranted here, who recongises it and such. Also, it seems some unsourced text has been added since the FAC. FunkMonk (talk) 13:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been keeping my eye on the article and see little addition of unsourced text. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You've removed some, but there is still this sentence: "Other research tools include using GPS trackers fitted onto the barn owl allowing precise location tracking of the owl." FunkMonk (talk) 22:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a couple more references. I have just discovered that a student editor has been assigned the featured article Common starling as their article for improvement! Fortunately, they haven't done much yet ... Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. Any update on who recognises the split of the Eastern barn owl or not? FunkMonk (talk) 12:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not my region of interest. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, but I think the article needs some sort of update, as was brought up at the bird project a few years ago. I'll try to ping  and  (who are currently discussing similar issues at the project talk) then. Do you think the proposed split of the subspecies is sufficiently reflected here? FunkMonk (talk) 12:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the world's main taxonomic bodies are finally getting together to hammer out a common list — about darn time! Unfortunately, it's likely to take a while. Fortunately, once it's done, all these "who agrees with what" conversations will be relegated to the past! I'll see what I can find. MeegsC (talk) 13:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: So maybe it's premature to add anything to the current text? In that case, I'll mark it as satisfactory. FunkMonk (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern barn owl split off 

message: Two articles about the same species UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not the same; the former is about Tyto alba in its modern sense (restricted to Europe & Africa), the second is an outdated page following a former taxonomic concept of T. alba from when it still included the now-split species T. furcata (Americas) and T. javanica (Asia, Australasia); compare their maps and subspecies lists. It would make more sense to merge the outdated Barn owl page into the genus page Tyto, or with the (badly titled) "Barn-owl" page covering the entire family Tytonidae - MPF (talk) 20:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Western barn owl]] into [[Barn owl]]
Talk:Resurrection of Jesus/Archive 2

message: Talk:Resurrection of Jesus contents > 6 weeks old archived verbatim - Amgine 18:03, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: I feel that referring to Clement as Pope is POV.  Can we call him "Clement of Rome" or something, instead?  (The article says that is how he is generally known.)
Jdavidb 14:21, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Either title is fine. Clement was clearly the Bishop of Rome, and I don't think it's terribly POV to call that person "Pope". One need not agree with everything the Catholic Church says about the papacy now to use the title when referring to past popes. Wesley 17:10, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Clement as Pope 

message: See also
    * "Did Jesus Rise From The Dead"
          o The Resurrection debate between Gary Habermas and Anthony Flew, referred to above''
Uh ... where was this referred to above? Jdavidb 14:26, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Did Jesus Rise From the Dead"
Talk:Formic acid

message: The so called 'high' Hydrogen content of 55 g/L is not really high compared with methanol at 71 g/L or other hydrogen storage like methane, ammonia etc. 
GerGroeneveld (talk) 06:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decomposition re-edit 

message: Acetic Acid has the same NFPA pictogram but carries an additional GHS diamond for flammability.  Why this discrepancy?  57.135.233.22 (talk) 20:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It should.  I added the flammability pictogram.  Sandcherry (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flammability 

message: "Formic acid is about ten times stronger than acetic acid" . Is this a pH thing? Or is it saying that formic acid would neutralise 10 times the amount of an alkali than acetic acid would? I am not a chemist. 78.146.94.150 (talk) 13:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:Celeriac

message: Better Photo
The current photo doesn't look representive of any celeriac i have seen in britain or europe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.130.206 (talk) 15:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The image currently in use (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:C%C3%A9leri-rave-fendu.jpg) looks pretty much like normal (UK) Celeriac to me. Could you explain (or better yet, show) what you think it should look like? Quickos (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

text: There is information on the web-site www.thinkvegetables.co.uk about how to cook with celeriac, although I should mention that neither the executive of Wikipedia nor its contributors can take responsibility for the content or implications of any external websites. ACEO 16:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Recipes aren't really encyclopedic content anyway - about the only time I think they could possibly be is when they're included as part of an article about a cookery book or a chef, but even then they should show something significant and unusual about that subject. Sorry. Quickos (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: I added a conversion of the degrees Celsius listed in the storage bit to degrees Fahrenheit. We still use the latter in America so it seems prudent to list both so people don't have to look it up or do the conversions. --Redwulf25 ci (talk) 04:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added degrees Fahrenheit 

message: Really? Surely that's a joke! Funny, but who on earth really calls it knob celery? Surely need a citation for that. Gymnophoria (talk) 09:55, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: @Gymnophoria I'm about ten years too late on a reply to this one, but I have just added a reference for "knob celery". You can actually find a few online. Strugglehouse (talk) 18:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't google it at work, just in case 😎 Gymnophoria (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knob celery?! 
Talk:Cricket (darts)

message: I suspect there is an error in this section, in particular in the paragraph
Player 2 throws a triple 16, a single 19, and a double 19:
    At the end of player 2's second turn he has closed the 16s, opened the 19s, and has scored 48 points (triple 16).
    The Score is 20 – 48.
The second player has not closed the 16s, does he? He has scored them but it is his opponents's task to close them, is it not?--31.30.48.173 (talk) 09:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Example game

message: Never heard it called that myself, but extended the definition to include some common names I've heard. I presume none of the names will get a citation, but it's unlikely we'll see this game in the New Scientist. Catachresis 01:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mickey Mouse

message: In the scoring area, the word treble is wrong.  Treble is the sound as in opposite of bass.
The correct spelling is triple.
Bluerocketpower 16:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling check, please 

message: The information in the 'Newfie Cricket, or "Faldo"' section nearly matches up perfectly with the information I've found on Tactics.  It seems to me that the unsourced info should be removed altogether, as I've not been able to find any references to 'Newfie Cricket' or 'Faldo' having anything to do with darts. (aside from the one reference to cricket also being known as Faldo)  The same goes for 'Twenty20 Cricket Darts', which is very similar to 'Bowlers and Batters', but the only sourced info on Twenty20 refers to a variation of the actual game of Cricket played on fields.  In addition, the only online reference to a 'Nottingham Open' has to do with the pro tennis tour.   Usmcrave99 (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Newfie Cricket, or "Faldo"... or Tactics perhaps?
Talk:Rolls-Royce Vulture

message: The Rolls-Royce Vulture aero engine did not have "two crankshafts geared together and driving a common propeller-shaft".  It had one crankshaft with six Master Connecting Rods, one to each crankpin.  Each of  these Master Con-Rods was driven by a piston in one cylinder block, probably 'A' block.  Each of the six big-ends carried lugs for the three sets of Slave Connecting Rods, each driven by its own piston in one or other of the three other cylinder blocks.
:Correct - see here:
:*[Vulture crankshaft]
:Rest of site (in French) here: [Manchester recovery] Ian Dunster 15:49, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Speech pathology

message: For a November 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Speech pathology
----
I am an early childhood education student, not a speech and language pathologist so I'd appreciate some professional input on this page.  I have done some research though, and I have more material I want to post and I will as soon as I can.  So please don't delete it yet!
AoGG 19:44, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: Speech & language pathology is a budding profession. At least here in the UK the use of speech & language assessment is continuously being expanded. The article should be updated by someone with an SLP background. Anyone? JFW | T@lk 13:17, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: This article basically deals with the same issues as Speech-Language Pathology -Celendin
:Agree w/ above. Would like to see something other than long bullet lists to delineate scope of practice after they are merged.
::-RJ1001 05:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Please join the discussion at Talk:Speech therapy.  If you have comments relating to this article specifically, please continue to post them here.
:-RJ1001 23:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion moved to [[Talk:Speech therapy]]
Talk:Fred Jones (basketball)

message: 1. It is not good form to completely nuke a page, replacing an article about one subject with an article about another (even if they have the same name).
2. Wikipedia entries should be completely objective; they should not read as resume entries or gush articles.
--b. Touch 20:02, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: To whoever edited this page immediately before me....
Talk:Jeanne Crain

message: Bill Keane (keane4) writes on November 11, 2004 . . .
For the direct external link to the Wesleyan Cinema Archives, point your browser to:
http://www.wesleyan.edu/cinema/
Note: Jeanne Crain's memorabilia collection is not yet officially listed as part of the 
repository as the bulk of it arrived in early 2004 after revisions to the site. Further, 
according to the archive's administrative assistant, Ms. Lee Carlson, Crain's collection is being documented and preserved at present and will be available for public view in the near future.
For actual reference (in a local news article) to Crain's inclusion in the archives, point your browser to:
http://www.rarereminder.com/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1099421264&archive=&start_from=&ucat=20&content=chron_news.php—Preceding unsigned comment added by Keane4 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 10 November 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is unquestionably another actress called Jean Craine (without the 'ne' at the end of her first name) who, as of 2007, is alive and living in northern England. I have reason to believe that this other actress was born in Preston, England, as the daughter of Eddie 'The Man With The Golden Trumpet' Calvert and that it was Jean and not Jeanne who was the star of A Letter to Three Wives. I am concerned that the biographies and filmographies of these two actresses may have been mistakenly merged or confused in this one article, as it is a natural assumption when looking through old film credits that Jean and Jeanne Crain were the same person; especially when they are similar-looking beautiful actresses of the same post-war era.
Does anyone have any information which could help solve this question. 82.46.235.71 10:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two actresses or one? Jean and Jeanne Crain 
Talk:Sister city

message: I have read the terminology section, and now I wonder what would be the best title on individual cities' wikipedia pages? As a title for the section where twin towns/sister cities are listed, like here. I ask because I noticed a lot of inconsistency there. Some articles had just "Twin towns" or "Sister cities" and others had some variation of "Twin towns and sister cities". The most common one I found was "Twin towns – sister cities" so I have been using that, but I am unsure if it is the best option. Should it be done according to the region's preferences, and therefore always include just one option, e.g. "Twin towns" when it's in Europe, or always both? And would "and" be a better connector? I think it might be easier to read with an "and", but I would really like someone else to chime in. – Ynneblack (talk) 21:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming consistency 

message: The idea of sister cities goes back to the ancient Middle East, which personified cities and regions, and created myths about how they interacted. For example, Jerusalem and Samaria were considered two "unchaste sisters" and it was said that Edom treated his brother Israel with enmity.  Gunkel, Hermann, The Legends of Genesis, 1964 (p.10) Pgoggins.33019 (talk) 18:10, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister City origins 

message: No where in this article is it explained what city twinning actually does. How does it encourage business links? Tax breaks? Does it actually have any fiction other than making lists of twinned cities? 2A02:810D:E80:2ED4:150C:1F76:54CC:1F79 (talk) 16:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does it actually do?
Talk:Carbon flux

message: NPOV: If it's roughtly in balance, why is there such a fuss about increasing levels of carbon in the atmosphere? Kappa 20:55, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, good question. You don't suppose all those socialists and environmentalists are being dishonest, do you? Might they have an ulterior motive? Such as redistributing wealth by force? --user:Ed Poor (deep or sour) 13:51, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)
Lets see, if your logic holds, then atmospheric concentrations of CO2 should not be increasing.
They are.  The evidence is clear that more CO2 is being released into the atmosphere than
is being sequesterd by plants.  There is no consipiracy of the environmentalists.  There
is irrefutable evidence. Luckymonkey 23:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

message: This article started out as a POV fork.  The subject is well covered at Carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere#Concentration, and it should just be redirected there.  SagredoDiscussione? 18:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replace with redirect

message: This title (Carbon Flux) really shouldn't redirect to the earth's CO2 concentration page.  It should just be about carbon flux of ecosystems and that article should then point to the current redirect page when mentioning global carbon flux.  Paultramarine (talk) 23:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Replace with article about ecosystem carbon flux
Talk:Sierra Madre del Sur

message: I added just 4 links, so that the reader or scientist researcher, may know that this subject article is not practically the only place where you can find the rarest new plant: * mobot.org,  ParasiticPlantRediscovery<
* blogs.nature.com, Parasitic hermit plant found in Mexico - May 01, 2008
*  news.yahoo.com,   Scientist rediscovers rare plant unseen since 1985
*ap.google.com, Scientist rediscovers rare plant unseen since 1985 --Florentino floro (talk) 07:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rare parasitic plant
Talk:Sickles High School

message: Greetings editors!
In an attempt to put this article on the right track, I have made some significant deletions.  The reason for these deletions can be found at Wikischools: What Not To Include.  Wikischools is the project that oversees articles about schools at Wikipedia.  In short, things that should not be in an article (and will be typically deleted quickly):
1.  Students/staff that are not noted for something other than being a student/staff.  This means, unless they get well known for something (winning a major national award, committing a heinous crime) don't include them.  Articles should not list team captains, coaches, etc.  While earning a 1600 SAT is impressive, there are many people who can claim that;  the achievement is not notable beyond the school community.
2.  Don't include items of short term interest.  The fact that a team won an important game this year won't be important after this year.  Don't include play-by-play descriptions of games;  exciting as they are, they are of relative short term interest.
Best of luck in editing! LonelyBeacon (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What Not To Include

message: The information about this section should only mention that makes the subject notable and which comes from reliable, third party sources. It should not contain a list of members and the playbill.   Dlohcierekim  17:08, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall of Sound 

message: Is  this a specialist  sports school  only or does it  teach  other mainstream  subjects too? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athletics & sport 