Talk:Rani Mukerji/Archive 4

message: Could this section be moved to the awards page because it is just another list and doesn't add a great deal to the main article? I can also see it growing in length in the future. Fay06 22:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I see the article growing in the future. Thus, no need to move as of yet. Thanks. - shez_15 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) 07:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, since she was awarded the position in those polls and lists, it would make sense to have it on the same page. Shifted it there, if theres any disagreement we can always discuss it here. Regards, xC | ☎  08:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polls 

message: I have removed in-appropriate info on her fashion sense, make-up artist etc. Also removed that Paheli went to the Oscars when in fact it was India's official entry to the Oscars and did not go any furthur then that. Also that info belongs in the film article. Whoever her shoe designer, make-up artist etc is, does not belong in this article. Thank you. -- Pa7 16:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: As per User:AndyZ/peerreviewer - Automatic peer review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
*See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
*If this article is about a person, please add  along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.[?]
*Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), honour (B) (American: honor), favourite (B) (American: favorite), criticize (A) (British: criticise), ization (A) (British: isation).
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**“In the year [of] 1999”
*Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): couldn't.
*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, xC | ☎  10:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automatic Peer Review 

message: Good to see you back. Can you make a wikipedia Commons page for Rani since she has no images on her main article as well as in her infobox. And the name KKHH should be there since it doesn't make it messy and keeps it organized just like KANK. And please ask someone to reverse the filmography chart so it's in chronological order. And we also need to expand on details soon. Thanks. - sheZ_15 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have a look at the commons bit. About KKHH, we should use the full name of the movie in the infobox, for the sake of conformity. I see you've changed the style of the infobox, no problem, both ways works fine. If anyone raises objections, we can always work that out. The filmography bit is a bit tedious...copy-paste and re-arranging required... I'll get it to it asap, a bit busy off WP right now. Take carexC | ☎  06:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment 

message: * Her next release was B.R. Chopra's Baabul which celebrated the production house’s 50th year in cinema. Mukerji signed the movie upon her parents' request who wanted her to promote the reality of widows in India, an issue the movie dealt with.[34] The director initially wanted Manish Malhotra to design the outfits for the actress, but Mukerji insisted on Sabyasachi Mukherji. She was sceptical about the fact that Malhotra was already doing KANK and perhaps, the costumes might look similar as both movies were to release back to back. Interestingly, the saris became a trademark as her ethnic look in the movie earned many praises.[35][36] Later in 2007, one of Mukerji's sari in Baabul, designed by Sabyasachi Mukherjee, was auctioned off at a charity dinner. The proceeds went towards a home for girls who live on the Howrah platforms. Although much hyped, the movie did not do well at the box office in India[37] but proved to be a hit overseas.[38]
Some of this is un-encyclopedic and is definently not needed. What has B.R. Chopra's production house status got to do with Rani Mukerji, it does not belong in this article. The part that bothers me most is stuff on her fashion sense, that is un-encyclopedic and journo material. The director initially wanted Manish Malhotra to design the outfits for the actress, but Mukerji insisted on Sabyasachi Mukherji. She was sceptical about the fact that Malhotra was already doing KANK and perhaps, the costumes might look similar as both movies were to release back to back. Interestingly, the saris became a trademark as her ethnic look in the movie earned many praises -- This part is written as if someone knows her on a personal level. Stuff about her fashion flair is not needed in this article. I've read the sources which basically says she looks good in the sari's. That does not mean that they have become a trademark! There's no need for that -- Pa7 00:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: There have been recent suggestions by an editor on the page Wikipedia:Peer review/Rani Mukherjee/archive1. These should be considered as community feedback and incorporated into the article.
I'll be going as per the suggestions, and posting notes on the talk page for any substantial changes. Regards,xC | ☎  07:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to request all editors to please stop naming references unneccessarily. With this edit I had to remove 21 unneccessary names. Please note that refs only need to be named if the same reference is being used multiple times within the article. If not, then [Details] is sufficient, there is no need to name every single ref. Thanks,xC | ☎  07:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Peer review/Rani Mukherjee 

message: Xc, you've done a great job. Thanks. We better start the Commons page soon. Or have small pics throughout the page like Hilary Duff or Lindsay Lohan's page. - shez_15
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) 
:Thanks for the kind words Shez. Yes, the article does need pictures... I've gone nuts looking for free images. If anyone can find snapshots from her movies, we can use those in tandem with critical commentary for her role. For everything else, we're gonna need free images only... sigh thesearch continues...xC | ☎  05:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great job!