Talk:Agnes Meyer Driscoll

message: The article mentions that she took two years off to work for a private company. Was that Herbern? Maury 13:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's clear now: it was a private company trying to create an unbreakable cipher. As the now cited documents describe, she broke a published selection of ciphertext which really messed Herbern up; she then went on to advise the company. The proposed machine, of which I do not know the details, never could meet the design specifications of the military - Navy I think. Jbeyerl (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Identity of "private company"?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Agnes Meyer Driscoll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080726113217/http://www.nsa.gov/women/women00021.cfm to http://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/driscoll.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080726113217/http://www.nsa.gov/women/women00021.cfm to http://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/driscoll.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130918015635/http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/crypto_almanac_50th/Madame_X_Agnes_Meyer_Driscoll.pdf to http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/crypto_almanac_50th/Madame_X_Agnes_Meyer_Driscoll.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080726113217/http://www.nsa.gov/women/women00021.cfm to http://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/driscoll.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080726113217/http://www.nsa.gov/women/women00021.cfm to http://www.nsa.gov/honor/honor00024.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Agnes Meyer Driscoll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130918015634/http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/crypto_almanac_50th/Madame_X_Agnes_in_Twilight.pdf to http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/crypto_almanac_50th/Madame_X_Agnes_in_Twilight.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080726113217/http://www.nsa.gov/women/women00021.cfm to http://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/driscoll.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article currently states
"... she may have contributed to attacking a cipher called Venona.[8]"
The link [8] gives me a 404 error.
There is a Wikipedia article entitled "Venona project" not "Venona Cipher".
This article currently begins "The Venona project was a United States counterintelligence program"
AMD did not attack a cipher called Venona, there was no such cipher.
AMD may have attacked Soviet cryptograms, if so the program was, at the time, not called Venona but
Bride, Acorn, Copse or one of the other code names which preceded Venona.
Without access to link [8] I am unwilling to edit the AMD article.
AnnaComnemna (talk) 13:22, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venona, not a cipher. 

message: I added this source:
* 
It definitely should be used to update and have better citations in the text of the article. TuckerResearch (talk) 14:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source