lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of mountains in Massachusetts

message: Massachusetts geography buffs, the list of mountains here needs to be evaluated and integrated into the article.  The information in the link contradicts information found elsewhere, naming different mountains and having different elevations.  There seems to be no single trustworthy resource on this topic so expertise from Mass. mountain experts will be invaluable.  Badagnani 23:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More mountains 
Talk:United States Navy Steel Band

message: I Gregory Boyd was a member of the US Navy Steel Band from 1987-1990. I played double 2nd pan and cello pans. The Band was constantly touring and performing. I believe in the 3 years I performed with the band, we toured every state in the U.S. During this time we recorded "Steel Appeal" the 30th anniversary tribute recording of the Band. Please email for more information at info@gregoryboyd.dk www.gregoryboyd.dk
Moved from article by 8472 on 16:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Media access unit

message: As far as I know is that statement wrong:
In essence, all modern Ethernet networks are Token ring networks, just switching at faster speeds than their predecessors.
Modern LANs (Ethernet) work complety different than Token ring networks (No Token! No Ring!).
:I just opened this talk page and wanted to comment on the same sentence. Now that I know at least one other person thinks it's nonsense, too, I went ahead and removed it. As you indicated, Ethernet uses CSMA/CD for collision handling, while Token Ring networks use token passing for collision prevention. These are entirely different approaches. Neither does Ethernet use a ring internally (both modern Token Ring and Ethernet use a star topology of course as far as the users are concerned). Aragorn2 14:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:Campaignbox Roman conquest of the Iberian Peninsula

message: User Neddyseagoon just added a Template:Campaignbox Roman conquest of Spain to several articles (I presume). This is not acceptable and is clearly POV. Not the use of a campaignbox, but saying it is of the Roman conquest of Spain. It was not the modern country of Spain that the Romans invaded and conquered, it was the whole of the Iberian Peninsula. Iberia or Hispania, covers not only the modern country of Spain, but Portugal also. The word "Spain" in modern English (and its counterparts in other languages) means the country of Spain, not all of the Iberian peninsula (as the respective articles show). The fact is that Castillian expansionism over the centuries (ask not only the Portuguese, but also the Galicians, the Basques or the Catalans...) tried to monopolize the definition of Iberia in a way that satisfied its imperial interests. In fact, even if Spain was used in ancient times to refer to the whole of Iberia, today it is not. In this sense, given that the Kingdom of Spain only emerges with the union of Castille and Aragon in 1492 (and this is disputed since Navarre was only incoporated in 1512), one can almost say that there was never a Spain before that! It was Iberia that was conquered by the Romans, who called it Hispania. The country of Spain didn't exist then. It was Hispania that was conquered by Suevi, Vandals, Alans and Visigoths. The country of Spain didn't exist then. It was Visigothic Hispania that was conquered by the Moors. The country of Spain didn't exist then. The Moorish conquest was of Iberia or Hispania (that should not be confused with Spain, even if the term Hispanic is used to denote Spanish speaking peoples), and they called it Al-Andalus. This conquest and subsequent occupation led to a Christian reaction know as the Reconquista from which several Christian kingdoms emerged (such as Asturias, León, Castille, Portugal, Navarre, etc.). Over time Castille came to dominate most of Iberia (but not Portugal, except for a small period between 1580 and 1640) and the use of the castillian word "España" (which is the castillian version of latin Hispania) started as a political strategy to curb autonomy or independence from centralist Madrid (for the same reason Castillian language started to be known as Spanish, implying the irrelevance of other Iberian languages - this was still a problem in the Spain of the 20th century, with the active repression of languages other than Castillian). Furthermore, if you call Spain to the Iberian peninsula, this not only is simply not true, but is felt as profoundly offensive at least by the Portuguese. For all these reasons and more, the Template Campaignbox Roman conquest of Spain should be renamed Campaignbox Roman conquest of Hispania. I'm doing just that. The Ogre 17:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of Template: [[Spain]] or [[Hispania]]
Talk:Great Balls of Fire

message: Should source or remove.  There's no mention of this on the Wikipedia entry for the film (if assertion can be sourced, it should added to that entry).  The IMDB page for the film appears to have names for all cast and crew.  "John Doe" is credited for the part of "J.W. Brown", but the part was played by the former leader of the LA Punk band X who has gone by this name for more than 30 years, it's not a pseudonym.VAMark (talk) 22:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assertion that cast and production crew have had names removed from the movie project 

message: I remember hearing that it took them many studio takes (over 100?) to record this song. Am I just imagining this, or can anyone provide a reference? If true, it would be a nice fact to include in the article. Stuart mcmillen (talk) 23:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of studio takes

message: JLL didn't play the Star Club in 62, but in 64 he really did!
Regards
K.-H.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:D0:DF17:1A00:5890:2AA0:50F5:5D4C (talk) 20:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Now corrected.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: JLL's Gig in Hamburg
Template talk:Campaignbox Second Punic War

message: I allowed myself to edit this campaignbox without consulting. Hope that this does not disturb anyone. What I did: renamed and moved a red link, called "Siege of Utica". It was initially placed after the battle of the Great Plains even though the actual consequence of these events is reverse. As I intend to write an article about the fighting around Utica during the Second Punic war I changed the name from "siege" to "battle" which is in my view more appropriate. Then I saw that there is already an article named "battle of Utica" dealing with the Mercenary war, so I added "(203 BC)". Dobrin 22:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Utica
Talk:Giovanni (World of Darkness)

message: As to the quality scale, I would say this article is a B. It needs to have the references cited and to be rewritten a little.
As to importance, I looked at things like a hierarchy as the article said to do- Vampire: The Masqurade (top), Clans in V:TM (high), Bloodlines in V:TM (Mid). As Giovanni is a Clan and in V:TM Clans are crucial to the game, it's high.
--Lamoxlamae (talk) 22:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is in no way a B-class article.  There are simply no references at all, so it's not even a C-class article.  --Craw-daddy | T | 18:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Just noting that I removed the uncanonical dates listed there previously. They came from OWbN and are not actually apart of the genre set down by White Wolf.
SycophantNagaraja 06:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated 'Important Dates' 

message: The "Clans" in Vampire are equivalent to the character classes in Dungeons and Dragons, they are NOT just a story element. As wiki deems fit to allow the character classes of Dungeons and Dragons to have their own articles (Bard (Dungeons & Dragons), etc), there is no reason why the "character classes" of another exceedingly popular pen-and-paper RPG are not notable enough to have their own articles.
In addition, considering the large amounts of background info and game-based info on each of the clans, it is NOT feasible to merge them all into one article. In fact, if we were to do so the resulting article would be too big and then go against Wiki standards.
Please stop listing all Vampire:The Masquerade articles as non-notable.Flygongengar (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability Explanation and Disagreement about Merging and / or Deletion
Talk:3rd Armoured Division (Australia)

message: I have just completed the B class checklist and feel that this article could be improved by addresing the following issues:
* referencing: the article requires in-line citations to become a B class article;
* coverage: the article needs more content, also it should address why the Division was disbanded;
* structure: a History section (albeit brief) below the introduction would improve the article's structure, as would a notes section.
Just some ideas. Can anyone help out with this? Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested improvements

message: I have a Stuart M3A1 ex 3rd Armoured Div . The Formation sign is considerably different to that shown  on the Wiki page.
The formation sign on my Tank was over painted on top of the original which is still beneath . This is a fairly accurate representation. 
I dont know how to post Pictures here so here is a link to my fb page https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=493116220783291&set=pcb.493116877449892&type=1&theater  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginavampire (talk • contribs) 04:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  formation sign
Talk:7th Division (Australia)

message: There is something wrong here.  The "Formation" section says, after the 18th Brigade was transferred to the 7th Division in June 1940, "This was short lived, however, for the following month the division lost the 18th Brigade and gained the 26th Brigade, which was still forming in Australia."  But this, I think, is wrong.  The 18th Brigade stayed with the 7th Division throughout the New Guinea and Borneo campaigns; that is, to the end of the war.  And the 26th Brigade article says:  "The 26th Brigade was raised in 1940 and formed part of the 9th Division throughout the war." 
Baska436 (talk) 08:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, I don't have the Johnston ref to check anymore (but  might). Nevertheless, I'm pretty sure that the 26th was part of the 7th Division for a brief period of time, and I'm pretty sure that the 18th was briefly part of the 9th Division. The AIF brigades were moved around several times.  Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  From looking over my copy of Johnston The Silent 7th the article does seem to faithfully represent the stated source. As can be seen from the narrative the brigades changed several times, so in the case of the 18th it was transferred to the 7th Division in June 1940, then in July taken away again (and replaced by the 26th). However in Feb 1941 the 18th returned to the 7th Division and the 26th transferred to the 9th Division (this is on Johnston pp. 2–3). I hope this helps. Anotherclown (talk) 07:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  18th brigade 
Talk:Metalogy

message: The live version of Green Manalishi on disc 1 was already released on "Some Heads Are Gonna Roll (February 1984)" single, so please remove previously unreleased, or replace it with previously unreleased on CD.
SF 83.13.239.255 (talk) 12:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Manalishi 

message: I have a slight issue with the wording here "which has studs around the center." It actually has studs around the outside edge, as seen when the box is on a flat surface. Center just sounds wrong. There's a good pic on Judas Priest's website on the left, showing the placement of the studs. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studs wording ? 

message: There's a blurb on Heart of a Lion that states "previously unreleased, from the Turbo sessions (1986)" - however it was released on Halford's Live Insurrection in 2001 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Insurrection - it may have been a slightly different version, but still, it was previously released...not by Judas Priest, but again, it was released. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 18:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heart of a Lion WAS previously released
Talk:3rd Division (Australia)

message: Just made a correction re the VCs awarded to men of the 3rd Div: They were not reservists!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.128.51 (talk) 09:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Without wanting to start a whole Reservist-ARA debate here, I do not believe this comment to be strictly accurate. Both Corporal Reginald Roy Rattey and Private Frank Partridge were in the Militia, which in actual fact does make them Reservists. Reg Rattey was in the pre war CMF and then transferred to the AIF, although he remained serving in a Militia battalion. Patridge served in the Volunteer Defence Corps and was then conscripted into the Milita. The original clause in the article, which was removed, stated that these two men were the only two Reservists to have earned the VC. This is actually technically accurate, although I do not feel that the comment necessarily needs to be in the article as it does not really add anything to it. One final point, though - almost none, if not in fact none, of the VCs earned by Australian Army personnel prior to the Vietnam War, were earned by Regular Army soldiers. The point is moot, though, because the ARA did not exist until after WWII, and as such prior to that all infantry soldiers were either Reservists (be they volunteers or conscripts), or members of the AIF (who were not Regular soldiers, but rather either Reservists who'd volunteered twice (to join up and to go overseas), or just people straight from civvie street who'd also volunteered twice. Thus the whole debate really makes no sense whatsoever - what does it matter what terms of service they were under when they performed the acts they did? AustralianRupert (talk) 13:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  VC corrections 

message: Just something to note -- future WA Premier Ross McLarty served with the 44th Battalion and received the Military Medal in January 1918. Gnangarra 04:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something to note 
Talk:Legio X

message: I could be wrong about this, but I don't think the Roman army in the Late Republic had two legions carrying the same numerical designation at once (what would the purpose of that be?). Since the 10th was famously serving under Caesar in Gaul from 58 BC and all the way through the civil wars of the 40s, it cannot have been one of the legions at Carrhae under Crassus. I'm not sure whether we know the numerical designations of Crassus's legions, which are not identified in the current Battle of Carrhae article. Cynwolfe (talk) 12:49, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  no X at Carrhae
Talk:Jasper Beardley

message: Why is Jasper in :Category:Jewish Simpsons characters? Not only do I not recall it ever being suggested that he's Jewish, but I believe he's been shown in church on a few occasions. Redeagle688 21:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish? 

message: In Homer the Great Jasper is seen at the dinner table implying he is a stonecutter too.MartinDK 18:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stone Cutter 

message: he has reffered it at least twice. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.17.116.195 (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  blind ?
Talk:Wendell Borton

message: *Wendell has spoken like 5 lines the whole series. I don't think he's important enough to warrant his own article. The Bumblebee Man (included on that list) has probably gotten more screentime than Wendell, and even got his own segment in 22 Short Films About Springfield. --Rubber cat 20:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into List of recurring characters from The Simpsons?
Talk:Mariann Aalda

message: I'm fairly convinced that this article is an autobiography, based on the following (admittedly circumstantial) evidence:
:The creator of this article, Lady M, has also created the article Herotique-Aahh..., in which the character "Lady M" is portrayed by the subject of this article, Mariann Aalda.  
If the information provided in the article is accurate and verifiable, then Ms.(?) Aalda certainly has no problem in meeting WP:BIO, but, as it states just above the edit box for new articles, "All articles written about yourself, your friends, your company, their business partners or products, or as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, may be deleted without further notice in accordance with our deletion policies."  I don't think it should be deleted, but I do think someone else should create/edit the article(s).  --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 17:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiography?
Talk:1st Rhode Island Regiment

message: "was authorized on 6 May 1775" - authorized by whom and to do what ? otherwise this is a meaningless half-phrase.--jrleighton 17:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: —Kevin Myers 19:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what does it mean? 

message: I have moved this to a seperate article as they are not the same unit only share a simular name.Marc29th (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I was going to do that too, but I thought maybe the units shared a lineage or something that I didn't know about. —Kevin Myers 22:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[First Regiment Rhode Island U.S. Volunteers]]
Talk:Fallout Boy

message: I'm not sure I can concur with this being a merge, since not only does Bongo make a number of comics about Radioactive Man and Fallout Boy, the band Fall Out Boy has the same name, so this should be a disambiguation over a redirect anyway.  FrozenPurpleCube 22:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge reverted
Talk:3rd Brigade (Australia)

message: I have just completed the B class checklist and believe that this article could be improved by addressing the following issues:
* referencing: in line citations are required for the article to be brought up to a B class standard;
* coverage: the history section needs to be expanded to adequately discuss the Brigade's history, additionally the current composition section needs to be updated; 
* grammar: it is currently too short to assess this properly, so once it is expanded it will need another review;
* supporting materials: the information in the infobox could be expanded, additionally some images would greatly improve the article.
Just some ideas. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've dealt with these now. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested improvements 
Talk:Saira Mohan

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Sdsouza 19:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The file :File:SairaMohan.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:SairaMohan.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 14:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:SairaMohan.jpg]] 
Talk:RMS Berengaria

message: Hi,
how about merging 'Berengaria' into 'Imperator'? 'Imperator was the first name of the ship after all.
Best regards,
Volker
:Good idea, but with redirect from here into surviving article.  Kablammo 16:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... (redirects should exist for all names under which a ship served) --Lyndaship (talk) 17:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 
Talk:Colin Montgomerie

message: Since when is the U.S. Open part of the PGA Tour?  This should be changed, I believe.
--Raaronson 19:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is this golfer referred to as Scottish. His nationality is British. He is not a Scottish sportsman in the sense that Kenny Dalgleish is, because he competes as an individual, so you have to go with what it says on his passport. Act of Union 1707. They haven't repealed it yet. --OhNoPeedyPeebles 10:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Scottish? 
Talk:Reverend Lovejoy

message: To Reverend Lovejoy since that's what he is better known as. Buc 10:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Some of the characters are better known by their titles, not than their full names (i.e. most people say Mr Burns, Miss Hoover, Principal Skinner, Krusty the Clown, Superintendent Chalmers, Groundskeeper Willie, and Comic Book Guy).
Michael2 01:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed move: 

message: In the secton "Tolerance", I was surprised to see that there was no mention of the reverend's opinion of homosexuality?
It's been a long time since I saw it, but I believe in There's Something About Marrying, Rev. Lovejoy has a role in his opposition to same-sex marriage?
Anyone wanna clarify this?
Thanks Gay15boy (talk) 07:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuality 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Julius Hibbert which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:00, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Dr. Hibbert which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Weathervane effect

message: Although I was the one that tagged this as CSD, it could actually be a good article. The author just needs to add some references and a bit more detail. Right now, it is too minimal, less than what I consider (but that's not really important) minimal for a stub. An external link and / or citation would help a lot. We might let this one stand a little bit to give the author a chance to beef it up. It's not in the same category as a lot of the CSD I see....
Brian 17:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too minimal?

message: As
1) Nothing seemed to have been going on here for quite a while
2) It was tagged for improvement or deletion
3) It was grossly inaccurate, both in content and reference content
I took the liberty to rewrite the article.
I also redirected weathercocking to this article.
Effte (talk) 08:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version
Talk:Shankar–Ehsaan–Loy

message: Why should there be scripts when one is a South Indian and the others are not? Secret of success (Talk) 13:47, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You could move it to the Members section, one for each person. BollyJeff || talk 14:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that would be better. I'm not sure about what Ehsaan and Loy's mother tongues are, but anyway I added Hindi script. Secret of success (Talk) 09:35, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to remove scripts 