lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ciara

message: So please change the introductory line from this:
Ciara Princess Harris-Wilson (/siˈɛrə/ see-ERR-ə; born October 25, 1985)[1][2] is an American singer, songwriter, dancer, and model.
to the following:
Ciara Princess Wilson (/siːˈɛrə/ see-ERR-ə) (née Harris; born October 25, 1985)[1][2] is an American singer-songwriter, dancer, model and actress.
Ciara changed her last name to Wilson, she didn’t hyphenate her last name.
: A whitepages.com search is not a reliable source. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2020

message: She now has 3 children "Win Harrison Wilson" was just born. See below 
Ciara's instagram baby announcement  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:601:CE7F:40:6DC8:514D:3BB0:ACF0 (talk) 04:44, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  children 

message: Remove this errant line in the infobox:
:|           = Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.Riverdale, Georgia, U.S.
which causes the page to appear on :Category:Pages using infobox person with unknown parameters
Do not revert back to the edit that restores the  parameter as that parameter is no longer a supported  parameter. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 18:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done EN-Jungwon 18:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2021 

message: The Couples Quiz 47.199.45.18 (talk) 16:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2021 

message: Please change the intro from:
"Born in Austin, Texas, she traveled around the world during her childhood, eventually moving to Atlanta, Georgia, where she joined the girl group Hearsay."
to 
"Born in Fort Hood, Texas, she traveled around the world during her childhood, eventually moving to Atlanta, Georgia, where she joined the girl group Hearsay."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5290:2EB0:C565:C7B4:C408:312E (talk) 18:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  no reference provided. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2021

message: Just to minimize the chances of redundant changes (people repeatedly changing her birth place to Atlanta) and ensure entries to the legacy section remain while still allowing members to update and contribute (w/ accounts) NotPlanningOnDoingMuch (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Protected Edit Request, February 2022
Talk:List of urban planners

message: I am adding a separate list of urban theorists.  I know that many practitioners are also theorist, but it seems more sensible than a list of "related individuals", and also means the Urban planning front page can be tidied.  Also we could add a few more theoreticians!
--stochata 12:01, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I listed Bingler as the planner involved with UNOP because he was the principal planning co-ordinator, and he has apparently been noted in many third-party sources. Furthermore, UNOP is a notable plan and needs a Wikipedia article. (The Unified New Orleans Plan is the planning process attempting to rebuild New Orleans after Katrina.)  —  Rickyrab | Talk 19:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Steven Bingler

message: Wouldn't it make more sense for the list to be alphabetical, or have it in a sortable table?  Perhaps the ancient planners could be separate.  LinguistAtLarge • Msg  22:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordering list 

message: This page is really a list of urban plans, rather than a list of planners. I'm going to work on an expansion and move to List of Urban Plans, unless there's any objections. Fitnr (talk) 19:24, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Urban Plans
Talk:4G

message: I know there's a big debate whether 4G represents a greater radiation threat than 3G, but there's nothing in this article about it - not even a link to Mobile phone radiation and health.  Since there are specific articles claiming that 4G is more dangerous than 3G, should there be related info here? Timtempleton (talk) 21:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health effects of 4G? 

message: There shouldn't be a subheading for the UK.  Merge content into an existing subheading, move to another article, or delete.  —DIV (120.17.117.106 (talk) 11:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK subheading 

message: Hi,
As a techno-illiterate (and user of an old Nokia only for talk & text, no internet because I don't want/need it on my phone, and currently on 3G) I have a question that may sound stupid, but I'm wondering about the two different summaries of this subject, one on the disambig page: "4G is a generation of standards for mobile telecommunication" and the other at the top of this article: "This article is about the mobile internet access standard." 
The second one could be taken to imply that 4G only provides internet access and doesn't provide phone (talk & text) services. For all I know, this may be the case, but if not, perhaps the summary for this page should be changed to "This article is about the mobile telecommunication standard.".
Thanks in advance. --Philologia 00:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differing summaries of the subject 

message: Since T-Mobile is shutting down Sprint's LTE network on 30 June 2022, would it be constructive to add a Past 4G networks section to the page similar to the section in the 2G and 3G articles? Joshua Shah (talk) 14:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past 4G Networks
Talk:Peter J. Brennan

message: But I took out the sentence "It is believed that the resistance to minority recruitment led to many minority workers not joining unions." While the exclusion of blacks and other minority workers from unions may have once created a general opposition to unions in the African-American community, those days ended sixty years or more ago. I think that the particular problem in the construction trades has more to do with residual white racism, nepotism and territoriality (some trades are happy to be smaller so they have more jobs for fewer members) in the unions, rather than with lingering resentments on the part of black workers outside them. At any rate, the issue is complex enough that I thought this stray sentence coming at the end of the article only started problems; maybe someone who knows the field can deal with it in encyclopedic detailin some other article. 24.126.41.116 10:04, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article

message: This article was mentioned and linked here. Bearian (talk) 19:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article was mentioned 
Talk:Anal jewelry

message: It is my personal opinion that edits like  are not making Wikipedia better. You may now forget what I said as Wikipedia policies think this is ok. ( Atleast so I've been told. ) Just had to spit it out. Thank you and good night. --Easyas12c 10:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disconstructive editing 

message: Just because something is jeweled, does not necessarily make it jewelery.  Both of the products described in the link seem like fancy butt plugs - I don't see how that merits them their own article.  Wearing "anal jewelry" or "fancy butt plugs" doesn't strike me as something that merits its own entry here on Wikipedia, it's not a particularily common behavior unto itself, nor is it a fashion or jewelry trend of note either.  Couldn't all of this information be rolled into the page on butt plugs, or even the page on non-piercing body jewelry? Right now it basically reads like an ad for the two persons currently marketing these niche products.  Also describing the two products as the "most famous" makes little sense, as so far as I can tell they are the only products, and that they are not particularily famous, notable or well known.  Is anyone else making similar products? Glowimperial 18:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All I know is i made my way here from the list of copyrighted image proposal discussions or whatever its called and i'm extremely glad i haven't been on the article page.--I'll bring the food 16:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've redirected anal jewelry to butt plug and copied over the bulk of the content. If anyone feels it should be in its own section there, feel free - or i can do it for you. But this will definitely bring more attention to anal jewelry as a topic (fwiw). ViniTheHat (talk) 23:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: after thought: i did not merge with non-piercing body jewelry first: it's more akin to butt plugs and second: it didn't occur to me. ViniTheHat (talk) 23:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: after-after thought: thirdly: that page doesn't really exist anyway. ViniTheHat (talk) 23:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aren't we basically talking about fancy butt plugs here?
Talk:CA Anti-Spyware

message: I have listed this article for deletion as spam. The request was voted down because it is about a notable piece of software. The article still needs to be rewritten - at the moment it is little more than an advertisement. - Mike Rosoft 15:25, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: On 23 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep and cleanup.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/PestPatrol for a record of the discussion.
As I wote this piece, I just wanted people to understand that this is not designed to be an advertisement, and I don't work for Pestpatrol. I wanted Pestpatrol to have an article, since it is one of the most historically-important antispyware vendors. Everything I say about Pestpatrol is true, including the fact that it is controversial.
I find it important in an encyclopedia article to make it clear:
*why something is important (in case it should appear in an unusual context like in a novel years from now)
* if it is controversial
* what other vendors have used it 
* background information
* notable contributions to an industry
If this sounds like an ad, perhaps it hasn;t met my requirements.
Smkatz 13:14, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: from Vfd
Talk:Lewis A. Pick

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Lewis A. Pick.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 16:29, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2005 Canadian federal budget

message: Shouldn't the budget articles be named "Canadian federal budget, 2005" to follow the format used for elections? This is also semi-endorsed by the Wikipedia style manual. Kevintoronto 17:48, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bill C-48 and Bill C-43 redirect here, but neither is mentioned in the article. --Menchi 07:16, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill C-48 & 43 
Talk:Islam in Algeria

message: christians 1%? never seen an Algerian christian in my life, But if they number 1% then Areligious people would number 10%.--Agurzil 18:01, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This Israeli site: [JP] writes:"Islamists loot and burn protestant church in Algeria"Agre22 (talk) 23:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Islamists loot and burn protestant church in Algeria

message: Why are you introducing original research in the middle of a sourced sentence ? Your source which states (There are also Amerites (Sunnis of Turkish origin), Ibadists (neither Sunni nor Shia) in the M' Zab, and brotherhoods mostly in the south) is clearly a fringe nonsense, what makes you think your POV misrepresentation of it deserves to be in the lead ? M.Bitton (talk) 20:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , I am more than happy to work together in order to improve all these articles. The question is, are you willing to? The part saying "most of whom live in the M'zab Valley region" was not written by me. Please do check the history section before accusing me. O.celebi (talk) 20:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm open to suggestions on everything. It's a shame you have only been deleting sourced information. The majority of this article has no sources at all, yet, it seems, you have no problem with it.O.celebi (talk) 20:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  No every sourced information deserves mentioning. Even though every Madhab is represented in Algeria, the only ones that are associated with it are the Maliki and the Ibadi (a fact backed by secondary and tertiary sources). I see no reason to give UNDUE weight to a rite that is barely mentioned in reliable sources. I reverted to the previous neutral version and added the Hanafi source where it belongs: in the practice section. I also removed the mosques images along with their wp:or captions and irrelevant foreign language (see MOS:FORLANG for more info). M.Bitton (talk) 22:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2017 

message: Why is the establishment of Sharia law in Algeria hard 154.230.141.79 (talk) 11:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islam 

message: — Assignment last updated by IslandersIslanders (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: North African History, AFH 4302
Talk:Proximity space

message: Note: several textbooks (Willard, Engelking, Thron) discuss proximity spaces. I can't remember if Dugundji does.--192.35.35.36 21:02, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Textbooks 

message: The proximity introduced (actually rediscovered) by Efrimivic on a set X, generates a completely regupar topology on it. There are a number of classes of proximities, e.g., basic proximity, Lodato proximity etc. Basic proximity generates a closure operator, Lodato proximity generates T_1 topology. Proximities are also studies through grill operators. Ref Thron, W. J., Proximity structures and grills.
AFAIK, nearness space is the same as proximity space. Need to say this in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Porton (talk • contribs) 13:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proximity Spaces 

message: I think all researchers know the definition of proximity spaces and fuzzy proximity spaces. But the thing we need to know the applications of the  proximity in other branches of sciences.
I hope any one know the application give us it. Prof. Abd El-Nasser G. Abd El-Rahman41.232.176.105 (talk) 19:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications 

message: It's said "Proximity without the first axiom is called quasi-proximity."
But without this axiom we lose the dual variant of the axiom 4. It seems that in the case of quasi-proximity it should be also given the dual of the axiom 4 (and probably axiom 5):
* A δ (B∪C) ⇔ (A δ B or A δ C)
* (B∪C) δ A ⇔ (B δ A or C δ A)
--VictorPorton (talk) 20:41, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition in Naimpally and Warrack defines quasi-proximity, which they call P-proximity, in terms of the double version of axiom 4, but only one version of axiom 5.  Spectral sequence (talk) 20:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Axiom 5 is symmetric, but Axiom 4 does need to be fixed.  I will fix it now.  —Toby Bartels (talk) 19:35, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

text: I decided that it looked too complicated to actually add both versions (especially since this isn't needed for the non-quasi case that the article focuses on), but I put in a note that it does need to be fixed, and roughly how.  (Also Axiom 2; same issue.)  —Toby Bartels (talk) 19:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error
Talk:Walton Summit motorway

message: *Was added for completeness. NickF 21:29, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be a shame to lose the article because then we'd lose the discussion! Thincat 14:42, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I have merged this article with M65 motorway after this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:50, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD debate link
Talk:Patrick Guerriero

message: I simply added a fact that I verified from multiple sources. It's definitely true and potentially useful information for people to know especially since he's a politician and it may help people form their opinion of him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.107.242 (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  how was what I added not constructive? 
Talk:Lili Ivanova

message: * The latest reedit, while definitely a passionate description of Ms Ivanova, is quite one-sided and would benefit from more biographical information. Mpntod 22:20, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
* Lili Ivanova and jazz/blues ... ??? Please, see a doctor and check your ears, or may be read and learn more what is jazz and what is blues !!! How about the great stages of Europe and ... USA ??? Obviously what you must have in mind are ... the cheap armenian restaurants in the gettos of Los Angeles ?! Congratulations, very accurate article ( laugh )!!!
*Definitelly more biographical information is needed. Concerning the comment above there are elements of jazz in some of her songs.
* This article was written as a piece of publicity for the release of a compilation CD in 2004 and was never intended to appear here as a serious reference item. I know, because I am the author! I did not give anyone permission to publish it on Wikipedia. It should be removed. Paul C. Haviland 15:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * I've put a copy violation page up instead. Mpntod 00:29, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * Thanks, Mpntod. I'm not at all bothered about the copyright violation per se, but rather feel that the text is wholly inappropriate as a Wikipedia item. Someone at the Lili Ivanova fan club must have got carried away! To rectify matters, a Bulgarian friend is going to provide me with biographical detail, and within a few days I hope to post a far more objective and accurate article on the subject. Paul C. Haviland 14:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *Great stuff.  I've started an article here (although currently it's very minimalist). Mpntod 09:53, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Andrew Snoid

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Andrew Snoid.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 22:29, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This entire article is plagiarized from Facebook. Snoid Headly (talk) 13:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: All three sentences of it? Whatever page you're talking about, it's more likely the other way around, given that this article pre-dates Facebook usage outside the US. --McGeddon (talk) 13:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   Plagiarism  

message: I've added various citations and a few small text modifications to the page. I'll remove the citations box in a few weeks unless someone can provide a supported and reasonable argument as to why it should stay there. I note the claim that the article is plagiarised, but that no real evidence has been provided. If anyone can provide evidence that there is plagiarism please prod me via my talk page and I'll rewrite the offending sections. Ross-c (talk) 10:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various Updates
Talk:Somewhere I Belong

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Somewhere I Belong.  The consensus was to merge it.  dbenbenn | talk 22:32, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I hate to throw in some duductive logic into debate, but instead of this being Alternative Metal, it should be considered Alternative Rock, and Rap Rock or Nu Metal. Alternative Metal doesn't really classify this song very accurately. Logically speaking, if one strips away all vocals, it sounds more like an alternative rock song, not metal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.30.200 (talk) 02:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree. I think the genre should say "Nu metal, rap rock, alternative rock." It's a much softer, more melodic song than a ton of songs on Wikipedia that are classified as "alternative rock." Tezkag72 (talk) 21:24, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Metal??? 

message: I think the genre should be changed to 'rap rock' as opposed to 'rap metal' because it's a lot softer and more mainstream than some other Linkin Park songs like Faint and Bleed It Out that are considered 'rap rock'. Solitude6nv5 (talk) 08:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The source cited says, "'Somewhere I Belong,' the first single, starts out all tender and gooey before toppling you into a raucous rap-metal vortex..." - SummerPhDv2.0 17:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rap ROCK or rap METAL?
Talk:1962 British Empire and Commonwealth Games

message: Was this the first time that the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland has competed? The reason that I ask is because Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia), Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) and Nyasaland (now Malawi) formed this Federation in 1953. However, it seems that in the two previous British Empire and Commonwealth Games (as they were known then) that the members competed under their former names? Can anyone shed any light on this? Ianblair23 16:59, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: See Talk:All-time medal tally of Commonwealth Games for discussion on this and other related merges. Kevin 05:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 
Talk:Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation

message: Just curious about Mandan/Arikara re Hidatsa; I found this page by looking up Gros Ventres, of which the Hidatsa are one part (the other are the Atsina).  Also wanted to comment that at some point there's got to be a different "Hidatsa" article, as that's also the name of one of the initiatory longhouse secret societies in Pacific Northwest Coast cultures; I think the word is Kwak'wala, I'm not sure.Skookum1 05:45, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Atsina and Hidatsa are separate groups that were called by the same name in French as far as can see - not that they are related to each other. Rmhermen 22:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hidatsa+Atsina->Gros Ventres
Talk:ComputerLand

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Vanstar.  There was no consensus.  dbenbenn | talk 23:22, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: ComputerLand is related to an important part of computing history: the retail and personalization of computers (Intel 8080 and later computers).
The article relates to the founder, who is likewise important for being one of the pioneers of personal computing, along with the other more well-known individuals, such as Michael Dell (Dell), Hewlett and Packard (Hewlett-Packard), Bill Gates, Steve Jobs.
The founder is cited on CompTIA's website in their section "Previously Inducted IT Hall of Fame Members".
http://www.comptia.org/news/IT_HOF/HOF_Members.aspx
If you delete this article, you had better merge its contents into the article for the founder, Bill Millard.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rj.amdphreak (talk • contribs) 22:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this page should NOT be deleted 
Talk:Maria Montessori

message: Hello, I would like to add the Portuguese titles and editions of Maria Montessori books (Works). I will use https://kirion.com.br/index.php?route=product/author&author_id=930 as a reference. Those are official translations approved by AMI (https://montessori-ami.org/). Kind regards. --Feliperoquette (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to instinctively respond with "No, this is the English Wikipedia and we don't list extensive non-English translations". And then I checked the "Works" section myself and realised that there were quite a few non-English versions of works. As a long-term editor of this article, I've boldly removed them; we don't normally list other language versions like that in a bibliography. The list would probably become very unwieldy very quickly if it listed all translations. Graham87 03:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 June 2023