Talk:Prince Philip movement

message: This can't be true! --Couter-revolutionary 21:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder how upon Earth they heard about him? Well, I'm glad interesting things like this happen.--Couter-revolutionary 23:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually the Queen isn't head of State in Vanuatu, since the latter is a republic. She is, however, Queen of Papua New Guinea. And of course she was Queen of the UK at the time preceding Vanuatu's independence, when the New Hebrides were an Anglo-French Condominium. Aridd 17:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous

message: I am terribly sorry, but to me this whole affair just reeks of urban myth/"benevolent racism". Most of the sources are English tabloids. And even the article in the more respectable Daily Telegraph does not convince me. Is there ANY proof that these islanders REALLY believe that Prince Philip is a god? I think it is more probable that this is just their way to pay respect to their (former) monarch, or even that they found out it is a clever way to get media attention and goods. As long as there is no proof of REAL worshipping, I remain extremely doubtful. --91.7.86.78 (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In an interview Prince Philip told that he has not the right to tell people what they believe in. To say that he is not a divine cloud have very negative effects on those people and so its offical position of the Buckingham Palace that Prince Philip does not claims to be a god but also does says he is not. -- 188.22.142.23 (talk) 00:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we have a source for the quote about him saying that he hasn't got a right to tell them what to believe, someone mentioned a couple of comments up. Something like that should be in the article if so. Sounds like a bit of shocking nonsense. I was surprised by the lack of any mention of him trying to disuade them of his divinity, and actually his actions appear to encourage it. That's not acceptable surely? There must be some reliable source that's addressed that if that is the situation surely? If someone asks you if you're a god you should tell them no. Unless you're a ghostbuster of course.121.74.233.34 (talk) 21:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The only source I know expressing some thoughts of Prince Philip (or at least of Buckingham Palace) on this matter is the following one : . Touriste (talk) 07:19, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Factuality??

message: When he dies the religion becomes extinct... or is Charles going to became a god too? --190.55.205.155 (talk) 04:06, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Nambawan pikinini blong Missis Kwin as a God?  Stranger things have happened... Mr Larrington (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That will be up to the followers of this faith, and any speculation on our part would run afoul of WP:BALL. Achowat (talk) 02:22, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

text: Phil the Greek has now shuffled off this mortal coil so we'll have to keep a keen eye on the media to see what transpires. Mr Larrington (talk) 17:40, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently the followers of this faith are discussing this question. The IP's second suggestion of Prince Charles succeeding Prince Philip appears to be among the possibilities. But according to that article, they did not worship him as a god, but revered him as one of them. Double sharp (talk) 09:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  And... 

message: The article calls this phenomenon a cargo cult, but the rest of the description does not square with what I understand to be a cargo cult. Could somebody perhaps expand on this?--2001:984:5CB7:1:B549:92D1:C480:1479 (talk) 15:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should be based on what is reported in reliable sources. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cargo cult? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to "Prince Philip movement"   (t · c) buidhe 14:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Prince Philip Movement →  – or  or  (with lowercase 'm'). In a quick review of the cited sources, I do not find a well-accepted name for this religious movement. Thus, the title seems to be a descriptive phrase rather than a proper name. A lowercase 'm' would thus be more sensible. However, the word "movement" also does not seem to provide a very clear identification of the topic. The article says it is a cargo cult. At some risk of a WP:POVTITLE (e.g., per MOS:CULT), using the word "cult" might improve the title's clarity. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 April 2021