Talk:International Mobile Satellite Organization

message: Some people think Inmarsat is a bully and there is some article that seem to support the claim. , ,  and 
:Some people think vague disparagement is food for Wikipedia. In April of 1999, Inmarsat was fully privatized by transferring its assets and operations to Inmarsat Ltd., a U.K. corporation that enjoys no privileges or immunities.(cuddlyable3)84.210.139.189 18:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

message: does the caller pay all the cost? or is it split between caller and callee or what? Plugwash 12:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  incoming calls 

message: "Newer services using IP technology feature an always-on capability where the users are simply charged for the amount of data they send and receive rather than the length of time they are online."
It is unclear whether the above means "Newer services by Inmarsat..." or "Newer services than Inmarsat's..." ? I think the latter because I cannot imagine Inmarsat charging zero for a provided but unused data connection. (cuddlyable3) 84.210.139.189 14:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data-only charging? 

message: The content of this page should be moved to "Inmarsat" immediately. The page itself should not redirect to Inmarsat though, because IMSO exists (www.imso.org) and it is a different entity than Inmarsat. They primarily oversee Inmarsat distress operations. The way things are now, this article is plain wrong. I will do it myself in some days because this is pure misinformation, totally inappropriate for an encyclopedia. IMSO IS NOT INMARSAT. --   Avg    03:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: I don't understand why, in the debate above, there was an insistence that "plc" was dropped.  Inmarsat has been a plc for many years now; the requestor is still in the dark (preprivatization)age.  On their website (www.inmarsat.com) it clearly shows at the bottom the official name:  Inmarsat plc.  The current name for this article is incorrect and misleading, not reflecting the changes to Inmarsat some ten? years ago.
:Because of WP:NAME#Companies -- "The legal status of the company (Corp., plc, Inc. or LLC), is not normally included, i.e. Microsoft or Wal-Mart." "Inmarsat should be fine for an article title. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 06:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, if Inmarsat is not the IMSO, then the article should be moved to Inmarsat (no "plc"). --SigPig |SEND - OVER 06:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the content of the page to [Inmarsat]. I did not move the page itself because IMSO is worth a separate Wikipedia article and should not redirect to Inmarsat. --   Avg    22:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: talking nonsense

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on International Mobile Satellite Organization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130909235808/http://imso.org/member_states.asp to http://www.imso.org/member_states.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified