Talk:Dominick Fernow

message: Because Fernow has such a lengthy discography, which has now taken up the majority of this article, perhaps we could place it into a different page. See for instance Merzbow discography Joeyvandernaald (talk) 13:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: Dominick Fernow is now the primary artist for a number of successful and popular projects, including Vatican Shadow, Exploring Jezebel, and Rainforest Spiritual Enslavement to name a few. Because this article is listed as a biography of a living person, wouldn't it be more appropriate to rename the article 'Dominick Fernow' and make his work with Prurient just one of the sub-categories here? Joeyvandernaald (talk) 13:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominick Fernow or Prurient? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dominick Fernow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061026061745/http://www.semtexinc.com/reviews/review.php?ID=145 to http://www.semtexinc.com/reviews/review.php?ID=145
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Having listened to Prurient for some years i was alarmed to learn, after looking deeper into Dominick Fernow that there are fairly wel substantiated links to far right individuals that raise concerns and I think should be included on his bio. There is a mention in the bio about how Prurient has been written about in a number of publications, some of which have deleted or altered their articles since this information came to light. 82.44.6.40 (talk) 00:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Some editors who seem to be clear Fernow partisans keep removing these references from this page. Rainforestspiritualenslavement (talk) 21:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Who cares if the person is notable? The article exposing this stuff uses all primary sources and clear references. to make its case. It absolutely belongs here. Also notably Fernow has never publicly denied its contents. Rainforestspiritualenslavement (talk) 21:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia editors and administrators care, and our policies protecting living individuals does not allow for inclusion of such poorly-sourced content. You cannot add material to articles sourced to self-published sources such as substack. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

text: All articles about people on Wikipedia MUST be notable. This is a nonnegotiable rule (see WP:BIO). Additionally, extra care must be given to using primary sources, as stated by WP:USINGPRIMARY. If such claims are true, then multiple, WP:Reliable sources will be found, and could be used. Until then, self-published claims cannot be used here. Zinnober9 (talk) 22:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Except it has been explained. You choosing to disregard Wikipedia policies does not make the removals unexplained. Have you reviewed the policy links that have been provided to you here and on your talk page?-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to The Quietus article specifically states "tQ acknowledges that it has extensively covered Dominick Fernow's work in the past and not sufficiently raised or researched the above-mentioned issues." As the material has been removed on WP:BLP grounds, you need consensus to include it. I suggest you start a thread at WP:BLPN if you would like to elicit further input from other editors.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are actively misreading that statement. That statement is TQ being accountable for not having *previously* examined the information they are now re-reporting and confirming. Personally, I find it pretty weird you're defending this so hard when a) the artist hasn't denied it b) none of the material in the piece has been shown to be incorrect!  Rainforestspiritualenslavement (talk) 23:38, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: but yes i will start a thread, thank you Rainforestspiritualenslavement (talk) 23:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

text: thank you Nodumbdumbs (talk) 19:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Addendum to previous edit: The Pitchfork article I deleted (source #11 as of the prior edit) hardly even mentions Fernow in passing, much less his personal history--it wouldn't have even stood on its own. 74.196.6.231 (talk) 19:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to far right