lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Configuration item

message: There are many broken links in this page. Suggest updating, or removing URL reference. Iamthezio (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 

message: Is a configuration item in any way related in concept to an end item, from the world of bill of materials?  70.247.170.9 (talk) 22:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: End items

message: People can be configuration items? I have never heard of such a use of the term, and I challenge its validity. Can someone justify this?
67.69.19.58 (talk) 14:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While I can't give you a yea or nay, I suspect that in a HR organizational sense, people can be organized in such a way that they can be considered "configuration items".  70.251.241.131 (talk) 23:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: People

message: This is a circular definition, therefore next to useless.  It would be useless if it did not provide any context. Leandro GFC Dutra (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Circular definition

message: This article appears to be based off one user's misunderstanding of one company's implementation of configuration management.
Please see SAE document EIA-649B "Configuration Management Standard" for a guide aimed specifically towards manufacturing, which this Wikipedia article claims is impossible.
From the article: "CIs cannot be used in manufacturing sectors as it doesn't have any scope to include such configurations."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.168.6.143 (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is mostly incorrect information 
Talk:Lord Aston of Forfar

message: This title is really confusing. I've found sources which say its in the Peerage of England  and sources that say it was in the Peerage of Scotland . There also seems to be uncertainly about whether 'of Forfar' was part of title, and when the title became extinct/dormant, some sources say 1751 others 1845. If anyone can help in sorting out these problems please do! Thanks--Berks105 10:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Rocket (disambiguation)

message: "Houston Rockets / Rockettes are not people" - they're not? :) They are not individuals, but I think they would be classified as people. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 10:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are groups...when you say person, I don't think of a corporation or a team.  They should be separate from "people". Hbdragon88 02:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  People 

message: Added Dame's Rocket, Hesperis matronalis, to the plants section. I knew this plant only as "Rocket". I think in my area (Michigan) that is the common name. I do not know how large an area uses that as the common name, but I also do not think this addition clutters the page.
Nick Beeson (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plants
Talk:Hood unit

message: Deleted "This was originally done to avoid union conflicts, as the high nose ensured that two crewmen (one on each side of the cab) were required in order to see both sides of the track."  Not only is it uncited (after 13 years!), but it also is historically nonsensical.  Union contracts with US railroads up until about 1970 mandated a five-man crew whether there was any need for them or not (management especially resented having to pay flagmen, whose job was long obsolete). Solicitr (talk) 23:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed line
Talk:Polly Samson

message: She was "left homeless by squatters"? That doesn't make sense unless it's uk slang. Also her mother was of chinese descent? I guess so as she served in Chairman Mao's army. He was of chinese descent too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurtdriver (talk • contribs) 14:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squatters 

message: "she is one of only two female co-writers of any Pink Floyd songs." - What's the purpose of such statement? It's not like any music group should have a 50-50 gender redistribution in their credits list, or is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.148.183.115 (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly.  I bet the entry for 'Mademoiselle Nobs' doesn't state that Nobs is the only bitch to feature on a Pink Floyd Recording. 78.148.27.44 (talk) 23:17, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only two female co-writers
Category talk:Writers by language

message: Shouldn't all of these subcategories be hyphenated? -- Samuel Wantman 11:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyphenation

message: Does anybody else think it is strange that in :Category:Writers by language there is no subcategory for English-language writers?  The current categorization scheme has these writers in American, Canadian, Australian, Irish, English, Welsh and Scottish categories, but these are not just English-language writers but also include many other languages. There is also no List of English-language writers. -- Samuel Wantman 07:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, where are the English writers? It seems like a pretty big inconsistancy.  Cacophony 05:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

text: * The English-language writers subcategory problem seems to be remedied. -- Tomdo08 (talk) 19:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

text: * A list would be not so useful, I think. Other languages have also none. Without prior subcategorising such lists would be awefully big. -- Tomdo08 (talk) 19:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  English-language writers
Talk:Ruthenian Catholic Eparchy of the Holy Protection of Mary of Phoenix

message: Would anybody mind a move to "Byzantine Catholic Eparchy of Phoenix"?  The diocesan website has Holy Protection of Mary Byzantine Catholic Eparchy of Phoenix.   Putting "Protection" in the middle makes it odd.  --Chonak (talk) 04:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title could be better
Talk:Tynedale

message: The external link doesn't work. Shall I remove it or can someone fix it?
OK - I've fixed it. OAP boba 16:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extlink

message: According to , 11 Hen VII, c. 9, was "An Acte to make the Lordship of North Tyndall & South Tyndall within the County of Northumberland" : in 1495.  Morwen - Talk 12:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorporation into Northumberland
Talk:Tim Gill

message: You have Mark Pope, a professional basketball player as his cofounder when in fact it's a Mark Pope that was bought out by Fred Ebrahimi in 1981 before Quark ever became successful. The information in the previous update was accurate, if you view the IRS 990 forms for those organizations.  I'd rather read semething promotional rather than inaccurate, but you're the computer geeks.
This looks like a publicity blurb as opposed to an Encyclopedia article.--Jburstein 11:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: External Link: Please add an external link to Tim Gill's social networking website http://www.connexion.org
Laddbosworth (talk) 22:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Laddbosworth, 7 December 2010 

message: Gill Action Fund should be merged with Tim Gill. There's nothing that justifies a separate article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 04:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal (GAF)

message: Gill Foundation should be merged with Tim Gill. There's nothing that justifies a separate article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 04:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal #2 (Gill Foundation)

message: It’s highly unlikely that *they* live in Colorado (see personal life) if his hubby is US Ambassador to Switzerland. Boscaswell talk 02:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where they live
Talk:Sebastian Kehl

message: An anon user added a sentence regarding the (supposed) birth of his son. The sentence made no sense grammatically. I googled but could find no evidence of a birth. Did this occur? Can someone please correct. Rob 11:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth of son?

message: Is it worth noting the incident when his shorts ripped open, displaying his penis for the world to see? I know it's a bit gratuitous, but it did cause a stir at the time.
:I think it's worth noting as it was quite a famous incident. Also he looked circumcised which is unusual for German men.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.155.237 (talk) 04:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Physogaleus

message: The Walking With Beasts companion book identifies the featured sharks as the modern snaggletooth shark (Hemipristis elonguatus), so it wasn't Physogaleus. Jerkov 11:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walking With Beasts 
Talk:Northbrook Court

message: deleted as now moot. Busjack 17:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I took Mark Shale off the list of anchors and major stores. It doesn't have the square footage or sales to justify this assertion. Additionally it does not have its own entrances as the other stores listed do. Jguy432 05:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anchors & Major Stores 

message: There were escalators in the mall from when it opened in 1976. They were in slightly different positions than the current escalators. i.e.. I worked at Waldenbooks and there was an escalator to the second floor right outside our store, in front of where H&M Men and Apple Store are now. The winding ramps (we called them "funny ramps") were between what is now the treehouse and Lord and Taylor.
Also I Magnin was not open when the mall opened, it opened a few years later but was the first anchor in that position.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.14.228.241 (talk) 21:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Some corrections
Talk:Naval Battle of Dardanelles

message: The current article, Battle of Dardanellia and Naval Battle of Elli, are all about the same battle. All three are stubs, but the most well-known and 'correct' is "Naval Battle of Elli", as the battle is known in Greece, with "N. battle of the Dardanelles" as a second name. Before actually undertaking the merger, however, I'd like to notify so as to have any objections/observations voiced in time... Cplakidas 19:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article merger
Talk:Clone town

message: This article has now been pruned down to nothing twice, with claims regarding the "removal of original research".  This is invalid, as the majority of statements in the article are uninterpreted restatements directly from the NEF report.  I do notice that the link to the NEF report has become broken, but a simple search will find a PDF.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyphz (talk • contribs) 13:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed OR removals 

message: The article says "In Scotland, the major provincial towns such as Paisley, Clydebank, Greenock, Ayr, East Kilbride, Stirling and Falkirk all suffer from clone town syndrome with their identical array of chain stores and coffee shops in gaudy polar white shopping malls."
For starters words like "identical" and "gaudy" are hardly NPOV.  But also none of these towns were actually featured in the nef survey.  This whole paragraph seems more like someone's rather jaundiced opinion.
I propose to remove it.  Any objections?
--Stewart Robertson 11:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clone towns in Scotland 

message: Is there a reason the name and acronym are all in lowercase? Is there a reason that "think tank" is in scare quotes? I'm going to change both, but if I'm wrong, please change it back and explain here. --76.203.74.26 12:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  new economic foundation (nef) 

message: Rather than remove the Scottish provincial towns reference, perhaps it could just be miminmised to something like "Allthougth not included in the NEF survey, many Provincial towns in Scotland are considered to have similar characteristics"
Perhaps it would then be possible to remove the contested articles header, which does seem a bit extreme for such a minoe quibble ;-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.2.73.160 (talk) 11:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just rewrite note on Scottish towns? 
Talk:HMS Erin

message: The infobox includes
: "6 × 6 pdr in (57 mm) guns"
Should this be 
: 6 × 6 pdr guns
: 6 × 6 pdr, 2.2 in (57 mm) guns
or something else?
Likewise, should
: "10 to 3 in (203 to 305 mm) over turrets"
be
: 3 to 10 in (75–254 mm) over turrets
: 8 to 12 in (203–305 mm) over turrets
or something else? —WWoods (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arms and armour 

message: HMS Erin was not a 'King George V' class battleship as stated in the opening.  The 'King George V' class were designed as 35,000-ton Washington Treaty battleships well after World War I.  Because the Erin was designed with 5 main-armament turrets, it probably belonged to the class prior to the 'Queen Elizabeth' series of battleships.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.53.174.81 (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh ? The paragraph is linked to the KGV class of 1911, and states "modified contemporary of". Definitely not a Treaty class. Rcbutcher (talk) 11:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMS Erin 

message: Hi ed17, I don't see a reason to add a formatting comment, could you please explain?  --91.10.34.239 (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting Comment 

message: Does this sentence make any sense?
Four 1–2 in (25.4–50.8 mm)21 inch (533 mm)) torpedo tubes were installed
I have read like 300 articles about ships and i dont believe that 1-2 in is the diameter of torpedo =D  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JK FIN vehicles (talk • contribs) 06:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't understand 

message: Checked for typos, tidied prose, isbn-13'd the references, auto ed and Briteng, checked for due wikilinks. Rv as desired.Keith-264 (talk) 10:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE 

message: I'm looking at the "despite this" clause in the below blockquote—is that sentence also speculation from Fromkin? If not, I'd suggest changing that to "Regardless, the Ottoman government ..."
Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that that's probably a better wording.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculated 

message: I have seen conflicting sources on this date. In John Keegans book The First World War pg 216, he says they were seized two days after the ottoman-german alliance was signed, which would mean it was seized on august 4. However Eugene Rogans book The Great War the fall of the ottomans pg 39 he says that they were seized august 1, the day before the ottomans signed the treaty and he cites Enver Pasha’s letters. All of the other sources I have found simply say it happened in early august. Also this page is conflicting in of itself because the opening paragraph says that it was in august and then further goes on later to say 29 July. Lukeferg96 (talk) 04:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seizure date
Talk:Gedik Ahmed Pasha

message: Gedik Ahmet conquered Ermenek, Silifke and Mennan. The first two are obvious.
Ermenek in Karaman Province and Silifke in Mersin Province. But where is Mennan ? Can it be the present day village of Damlapınar (older name Manyan) ? Damlapınar is app.  west of Karaman. (bird's flight) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mennan 
Talk:XFM Scotland (2006)

message: What? :-) I couldn't find anything with Google to clarify this, either elsewhere or on the Ofcom website, but someone definitely should calrify it and add it to the text. What is the rule? What can licence owners not do?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.221.109.36 (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: "Devolved Nations Rule"

message: I'm going to revert the last edit to bring the schedule back. It was removed on the grounds that it was not "encyclopedia material". Perhaps not but lists of presenters and shows are normal. It would be better to alter the schedule to such a list rather than to simply delete it. I ask anyone thinking of just removing it again to consider that this would be more constructive. In any case it should still be checked for current accuracy.--Citizensmith 11:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Schedule/Presenters

message: Bearing in mind that Xfm is available in FM across London, Manchester, and much of Scotland, and as DAB across much of the UK; is Xfm just a minor station? Y control 14:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say major although it is important to say there are three different Xfm's. Xfm London, Xfm Manchester and Xfm Scotland. These would be classed as different stations completely I think. And if I completely misunderstand your point I apologise. :) -- Edits  AntzUK  Talk  10:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I think we're coming from the same place, I was thinking of the network as a whole (eg. the brand etc.), I'm just hoping to get a concensus on the major Vs minor status of Xfm as a whole or as individual stations. A number of bands appear on the Xfm playlist, but the status of the station affects if these bands are notable or not, and hense deserve/require an article in wikipedia. Y control 16:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Major Station/Network? 

message: Someone should get round to adding in the details of XFM's Winter Wonderland. It was a good gig, and i may get round to adding info of it in time, but i thought i should point it out for someone bigger, better, and more talented to attempt first.--SteelersFan UK06 02:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winter Wonderland(s) 
Talk:Nursultan Nazarbayev International Airport

message: Ust-Kamenogorsk => Oskemen
 Sky Walker 11:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: City names
Talk:EDRAM

message: I would like to see some proof of the EDRAM in the Wii, please. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.180.197.147 (talk • contribs) 12:04, 17 July 2006  (UTC)
Here's a citation for Wii.
http://www.allbusiness.com/electronics/computer-electronics-manufacturing/6302349-1.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.245.139.238 (talk) 17:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

message: POWER9 has 120MB of eDRAM per chip. --anon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:1060:2F00:0:0:0:3 (talk) 00:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  IBM POWER 

message: I would be interested in any research or PoC code that keeps encryption keys in eDRAM. To my understanding, this might be a defense against cold-boot attacks, DMA siphoning, etc; especially if (by chance) eDRAM is cleared upon processor initialization. --Osndok (talk) 21:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  eDRAM for storage of whole-disk decryption keys?
Talk:Sarus crane

message: Removed this cryptic bit
: and the natives of astrillia were aware that they were two different types of birds referring to the sarus as the brogla who dipped its head in blood. 
Shyamal 12:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Turns out that this bit may actually be correct, have added a related piece with citation. Shyamal (talk) 04:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: I'm undoing this obvious vandalism:
On average the balsa wood is larger than the female's throw up; Indian balsa woods can attain a maximum height of approximately 200 cm (6.6 ft), with a wingspan of 250 cm (8.5 ft), making them the world's tallest living flying bird.
DrHenley (talk) 23:41, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: While looking for a good historic painting - esp Mughal miniature - came across this:
http://www.archive.org/stream/lordlilfordonbir00lilfrich#page/n86/mode/1up/search/sarus has an image of a supposed Sarus in the menagerie of Lord Lilford that looks more like a Siberian Crane ! Shyamal (talk) 05:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: There is an edit move from 250 cm to 280 cm which seems to be uncited - ICF gives ~240 http://www.savingcranes.org/sarus-crane.html most sources stop at 250. Is there any WP:RS for 280 ? Shyamal (talk) 16:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: HBW gives a range of 220-280 cm. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 22:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, could you make the additional upper limit with the citation please. Shyamal (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wing span 

message: Now considered in genus Antigone per BirdLife and IUCN. Probably Wikipedia should follow?
http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/speciesfactsheet.php?id=2787  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.0.213 (talk) 06:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomic Revision 

message: I believe the views of this article increase distinctly during its nesting season. Gentle rising and dropping curves in traffic show genuine biological connections unlike spikes falling off (internet links on reddit etc) and a rising cliff (homework pattern - where there is no interest after a deadline).
- would be nice if such graphs for annual cyclicity could be generated more easily -  Shyamal (talk) 05:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note on page views
Talk:Martin Vukovich

message: The article has been written based on the information from the CV left previously on the page. RedZebra 12:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Noel Beresford-Peirse

message: I see his name spelled as Beresford-Peirse and as Beresford-Pierse (in both books and websites).  Which is correct? Oberiko 01:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not entirely certain! Coudn't work out which spelling is correct so wrote one in the title and the other in the article. Would you believe there are other spellings of his name just to make it a little more annoying, sources cannot seem to agree. The spelling in the title came from the Peerage site and if anyone should know i reckon they do. If you find out do tell me. Tristan benedict 09:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Hyperpyrexia

message: How about combining and merging Hyperpyrexia and Hyperthermia since both of these articles admit being one and the same. For some odd reason this phenomenon just seems to have two different names.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Defeatedfear (talk • contribs) 08:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Many of these example are of hyperthermia and not hyperpyrexia per say.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: definition

message: Merged to feverDoc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:VMF-111

message: I was in VMF111 at Dallas NAS, when activated in 1950.  After a few months the Co was looking through the records of the men to see who would need or wish to have more training. He must have read our folders pretty well for I have mentioned that I had taken a correspondence course in electronics. He called me into his office - scared me at first. Then he said he was looking at the records and had seen where I had bought a correspondence course in electronics from Capital Radio and Engineering Corp (CREI). He asked about it and was I still interested. I told him I did and was still interested.
He said he had reserved a spot in an Electronic Course, and would I like to take it. ....."YES SIR!!"
He enrolled me, I took a years training at Ft Monmouth Army Base in NJ for a full years training. I received the essence of a BSEE relative to the technical part, w/o and the other requirments such as English, History etc.  
I finished the=at schooling and met my wife there, and spent the next 42 years in the computer industry from tecnichian to third level of management with a great life and super income. 
WISH I COULD LOCATE HIM AND EXPRESS MY THANKS FOR HIS LEADERSHIP, CONSIDERATION AND TREATMENT AND GTHE BENEFIT FOR A GREAT LIFE FROM HIS DECISIONS. 72.191.39.108 (talk) 21:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was CO in Dec 1950 at El Toro?
Talk:X-band radar

message: There really is no need to have seperate W/V/K/Ka/Ku/X/C/S/L-band radar articles (9 articles total) for each radar band.  Suggest all be merged into the actual band articles.  --Evmore 12:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Consolidated yes - but under the topic "radar frequencies" or like heading.  Also include hyperlink from related topics to better integrate overall topic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.185.126.138 (talk) 02:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  X-Band Radar