Talk:Lifetime (TV network)

message: Hello! I was just wondering what channel Lifetime gives on... <redacted> I've searched non-stop to find out what channel but I just can't find it. So please! Help me out??!!
--65.49.212.66 23:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Each cable company chooses which channels it wants to put each network on. In other words, Lifetime appears on a different channels depending on the region and/or cable company. --70.81.251.32 (talk) 02:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what channel Lifetime gives on 

message: There's a weekday schedule there - but does anyone know what the weekend schedule is? And if you do, could you add it? Or tell me what to add? (Also - are all the movies on the channel orginal movies, or are certain timeslots always orginal movies and certain other slots always real movies? That way I could color-code the schedule thing better. So please help me!) Emily (Funtrivia Freak) 05:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weekend Schedule 

message: Can you please log on to http://www.mylifetime.com, make a photo copy of the new Lifetime TV logo and place it on the Lifetime Television page as soon as possible? AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally done. I wasn't going to just post that logo from there because I wanted a clean version. One came up on TV Squad today so I went for it. Nate • (chatter) 06:45, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can you please photograph the new Lifetime TV logo and place it on the Lifetime TV page? 

message: Can you please relocate the Lifetime programs to a new page titled List of programs broadcast by Lifetime as soon as possible? AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can you please relocate the Lifetime programs to a new page? 

message: Can you pleaes photograph the old Lifetime TV logo and place it in the logo section? The photo is on the following website: http://www.fourstarchef.com/lifetime.html AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can you please photograph the old Lifetime TV logo and place it in the logo section? 

message: Unless the purpose of Wikipedia is to serve as public relations, it is indisputably relevant to discuss the deterioration of the language used on Lifetime Television.  Formerly, the language was respectful of the audience, but in recent years Lifetime Television has become more vulgar.  Perhaps this is some quixotic attempt to try to sound more gritty and realistic, but it seems merely just a reflection of lowering of standards.  Censoring serious issues is hardly a route to a good Wikipedia entry.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.153.18 (talk • contribs)  17 April 2009
:Your personal opinion has no place here. If there has been serious discussion of this in reliable sources, then the topic could be addressed. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of the Sort of Language Used on Lifetime Television is Quite Germane 

message: The TV network is created by gender feminist for gender feminist to feed on women's fears that they will be raped and murdered in their own lifetime and also promotes female supremacy and portrays the entire male gender in the most negative light possible. If you would like any sources to support my statement then go on any site both for it and against it or watch any of their moves which most if not all of them are mean spirited at best. There fore the article needs to be written in the nature that the network operates and portrays its work. --203.206.73.28 (talk) 11:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Your personal opinion has no place here, 203.206, especially since you have some kind of bizarre vendetta against "gender feminists", whom you see behind every tree and under every bed. If there had been serious discussion of this in reliable sources, then and only then would the topic be addressed. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Its Nature Needs to be Addressed 

message: Pat Fili-Krushel is the Executive Vice President of Administration of Time Warner Inc. 
Before joining Time Warner in 2001, Fili-Krushel was President of ABC. When she quit, Disney president Robert Iger named Alex Wallau as acting head of the network. Prior to that position, she was president of ABC Daytime (ABC-D). Brian Frons replaced her as the head of ABC-D in 2002. 
Before joining ABC in 1993, she had been with Lifetime Television (where she greenlit its first original primetime series, The Days and Nights of Molly Dodd, after the cable net picked it up from NBC in 1989) since 1988 as both Group Vice President of Hearst/ABC-Viacom Entertainment Services (HAVES), and Senior Vice President of Programming and Production of Lifetime Television. Fili-Krushel joined Lifetime from HBO, where she had been Vice President of Business Affairs and Production since December 1984. 
Fili-Krushel holds a B.S. degree from St. John's University, and a M.B.A. degree from Fordham University. 
In September 2012, Fili-Krushel made her second appearance on Fortune’s “50 Most Powerful Women” list. She has been recognized by New York Women in Communications, Inc. through their Matrix Awards for her contribution to the field of broadcasting. In 2006, she was inducted into the Museum of Television & Radio’s “She Made It” Collection.
She currently sits on the Board of Directors of The Public Theatre of New York, Oxygen Media, Inc., the Board of the Central Park Conservancy, the Board of Trustees of Fordham University, and Mayor Bloomberg's Commission on Women's Issues. 
SOOURCES: , , , , , , , , ,   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.148.25.42 (talk) 23:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pat Fili-Krushel]]  

message: Just curious  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE95:8BB0:2DC8:4A4:2D14:8A75 (talk) 05:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Veronica Mars under "See also?" 

message: This article reads like a PR piece--there is no content that presents any critical or dissenting view of the network or its programming.  For example, Lifetime's original movies, which have received substantial negative press due to quality issues and tabloid approaches, are not addressed other than in a short, descriptive paragraph (an example omission: the Brittany Murphy biopic, which wasn't just panned--it was condemned). The entire article feels celebratory, despite the considerable controversy this channel has stirred for its latter decade at least, when it diverged from its original feminist format.  Alanrobts (talk) 11:34, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Alanrobts, this is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, so feel free to try your hand at editing the article. But before you do be sure to read WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:WEIGHT, and WP:RECENT and apply those policies to your edits. Also keep in mind that Wikipedia discourages a separate section on "Criticisms", as that encourages excess. Generally criticisms should be briefly mentioned in other relevant sections of the article. Sundayclose (talk) 16:01, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias needs to be addressed 

message: I propose that LRW get a separate article because it is its own channel and even though it may be a stub, it has sufficient information to stand on its own.  Billboard Man (talk) 12:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  LRW separate article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lifetime (TV network). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140429051310/http://tv.otroscines.com/2014/04/llega-un-nuevo-canal-en-el-mes-de-julio/ to http://tv.otroscines.com/2014/04/llega-un-nuevo-canal-en-el-mes-de-julio/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I distinctly recall it being called "Lifetime Television for Women" in the pre-digital cable days. This was later shortened to just , "Lifetime". This could've been a marketing gimmick for the New York area. I really don't know, but it's worth looking into. Wlmg (talk) 14:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifetime Television for Women  

message: The redirect Confessions of a Go-Go Girl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  CycloneYoris talk! 01:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Confessions of a Go-Go Girl]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect A Snow Globe Christmas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  CycloneYoris talk! 02:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:A Snow Globe Christmas]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]