lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Skyring/Evidence

message: I'm quite happy to defend my own statements and edits, but you don't think it's going a little far to attack me for edits that I clearly didn't make?
For instance, you say "Skyring claims that Australia was made a kingdom following federation. Reverted by Lacrimosus, see Talk:Canada for the reasons why this is original research." but  shows that User:Gbambino made the claim that Australia is a kingdom. My contribution - my one and only edit to the article occurs with the next edit at  where I correctly note that the Australian Constitution was an act of British rather than English law, as it was passed by the British Parliament, England having ceased to exist as an independent country some hundreds of years previously. User:Lacrimosus didn't revert my edit - he altered Gbambino's contribution.
Your mistake, and one you make several times, possibly out of incompetence rather than malice, is that you aren't linking to my edits, but to the edit following mine. Just because I was the last person to touch a page doesn't mean that I wrote every word of that version. In the case of Australian Republicanism my total contribution amounts to four letters, yet you are happy to attack me for a whole paragraph I didn't write!
Be fair, please! Pete 11:39, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with Petaholmes' Evidence

message: The only problems I can see with the evidence is that Skyring's posts are formatted incorrectly. You don't need to make a ==Level 2== heading for every date; please use ===Level 3=== headings. Harro5 05:09, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
:Thanks, mate. Pete 06:16, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: When are we going to get a ruling on this? So far the only effect of this referal has been to create yet another forum for Skyring's infantile exhibitionism. Adam 06:50, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Infantile Exhibitionism
Talk:Vincent Persichetti

message: Added external link to liner notes, and for full disclosure I work for the non-profit educational resource linked to. The notes provide reference for several facts in this article.Ribbonabaca (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: note on source addition

message: There was a long list of people he taught. I cut it down to only the famous people he taught. If one were to include just the people he taught who have Wikipedia pages the list would probably be even more gigantic than it was when I found it. I fixed a few bits of grammar here and there and altered some weird sentences or eliminated them. What I have done, though, is just wound dressing. The article could use a serious re-write. Also, it could REALLY use some research. There are all sorts of statements made here that are not supported. Most of the article is based on nothing I can discern. It may all be true but how can I know? Was his opera a flop? Who says? I added a bit that it was critics who deemed it so (that makes sense!) but that was really disingenuous of me. I was just guessing in the face of a gaping void. Gingermint (talk) 00:00, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It also needs in-line citations to the New Grove material, such as the 'graceful and gritty' remark.  Bad show, editor who was responsible.  50.111.19.34 (talk) 06:43, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Fixes but This Article Needs More 
Talk:E-poetry

message: I think iterature should be removed:  It is not just e-poetry, though some of it is.  Perhaps a selection from this interesting page should be made.  As it is, some-one thinking s/he'll get e-poetry winds up wading through a number of slow-loading links, only a few of which even might be called e-poetry.
Duplicate pages: there is a page titled Digital poetry which deals with the same content. I think E-poetry is by far the more common term, (although it's possible there's some subtle diffference betweeen the 2 terms). I'm sure the two pages need merging but am not confident to achieve it myself.
Sarah the poet 13:37, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

message: The gift of poetry stuff seems questionable as e-poetry.  In any case, it seems like it's an ad that's been snuck in (with the same link twice).  Shouldn't this eithe be eliminated or at least cut down so that it doesn't take up so much of the short article? Kdammers 10:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ad? 

message: sems to have too much non e-p stuff.  I think it should either be removed or a more detailed ref should be given. Kdammers 05:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The latest link
Talk:Physical restraint

message: I want to update the education section. Especially this part: "restraint may be used only when aggressive behavior interferes with an individual's own ability to benefit from programming". 
In most states, physical restraint in education can only be used when their is risk or serious bodliy harm to students or others.
Citing: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/seclusion/seclusion-state-summary.html
and an example here:
"Physical restraint shall be used only in emergency situations, after other less intrusive alternatives have failed or been deemed inappropriate, and with extreme caution. School personnel shall use physical restraint with two goals in mind:
(a) To administer a physical restraint only when needed to protect a student and/or a member of the school community from imminent, serious, physical harm; and
(b) To prevent or minimize any harm to the student as a result of the use of physical restraint."
From MA regulations: http://www.doe.mass.edu/lawsregs/603cmr46.html?section=01 
Can someone help me add those citations and/or the text?
Thanks,
Gregorio-Smith (talk) 14:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: plus I'm pretty sure that tiny hand will easily slip through the huge cuff !  --195.137.93.171 (talk) 17:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education section 

message: While I welcome the references included with the recent edits, I wonder whether the way they are placed inline is the way this is done within wikipedia. Methinks <ref> tags would be more appropriate. -- Klaus with K (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline quotes the way to go 

message: Nothing on restraint types, etc. I've redirected restraint chair here for now. Tijfo098 (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs serious expansion 

message: UK Police go beyond 'cuffs - at least in 2000 they also used the 'Emergency Response Belt' which is pretty much a Straitjacket with handles for ease of carrying ! May depend where you live ...   (not working) Google["Emergency Response Belt" site:police.uk]
--195.137.93.171 (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ERB 'Emergency Response Belt'  
Talk:Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation

message: Currently, the section Munhwa_Broadcasting_Corporation#PD_Notebook_and_allegations_of_unethical_journalism contains languages that suggest PD Notebook's coverage "incit[ed] three months of massive protests in Seoul." It also seems to cite only source materials that cast negative light on the program, and no attempts are made to present information in defense of the PD Notebook's producers nor the legal documents released by the prosecution and the court. The section also contains too much over-emotional words such as "provocative," "incite," "massive," "outraged."--Supergloom (talk) 04:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A bulk of the sources criticizing PD Notebook comes from the big three conservative newspapers. How about a more diverse range of sources? мirаgeinred سَراب ٭  (talk) 18:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia:Words to avoid recommends that editors stay away from words such as incite, maintain, cite, claim, deny, supposed, and alleged. I don't know who wrote the section regarding PD Notebook, but these are the words that have appeared in the section frequently. The bias that these words paint is clear. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭  (talk) 06:40, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias in the write up of PD Notebook beef import coverage

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Silikonz💬 22:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation →  – Unlike SBS or KBS which are at least sometimes (though infrequently) referred to by their full names, MBC is pretty much never referred to as "Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation" in secondary sources Freedom4U (talk) 21:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 February 2023
Talk:Mohe people

message: The modern Korean pronunciation of the Chinese characters 靺鞨 is, indeed,  Malgal; however, the final "l" sound is derived from a glottally stopped entering tone in older and Southern Chinese dialects which was stopped with a "t" [ㄷ] sound.  The t-glottal stops changed to "l's" [ㄹ]in Middle Korean. So while Korean is usually a better reflection of the sounds represented for non-Chinese words in old documents than Mandarin dialect Chinese, we need to keep the above sound change in mind.  The t-stops are preserved, moreover, in Japanese--reflected as an additional syllable, "-matsu" (マツ) [靺鞨=マツカツ」.  So, the more accurate Korean reading for these characters would be Matkat rather than Malgal. Doc Rock
:You dont know Korean language.--Hairwizard91 08:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MALGAL 

message: I've made a series of maps that cover history from 1300 BC to 1200 AD, including several maps that show "Mohe Tribes". But I don't have any more information than that! I'd love to include borders for the Mohe and any official Kingdoms they ruled. Anyone have any info? Thomas Lessman (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mohe borders and lands?

message: http://www.iacd.or.kr/pdf/journal/04/4-02.pdf is a totally bogus article. It's making statements based on vague resemblances of words, not considering even phonetic changes during times and other factors. "Because "Mogher", "Merjie" and "Mo-jie" are all pronounced much like "Magyar", it can be deduced that the Mo-jie fu of the Bo-hai (渤海) kingdom was probably the residence of the remaining tribespeople of the Mogher, a majority of whom had moved to the west and kept the name "Magyar".". Seriously, is this considered a scientific approach? Teemeah  편지 (letter)  13:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogus sources 

message: Balhae was an ethnic Mohe Tungusic ruled Kingdom with some Korean subjects. The royal family was Mohe.
"Should Balhae be viewed as Korean because its founder and many of its subjects had been subjects of Goguryeo? Or, because its founder was a Malgal, should it be viewed as an Inner Asian state, more like the Xianbei, Khitan, Jurchen ... Treating it as part of Korean history is much like treating the Xiongnu and Mongols as part of Chinese history" - Pre-Modern East Asia: A Cultural, Social, and Political History, pg. 111
"[Parhae] did occupy the northernmost parts of what is now Korea, including the modern Hamgyong Province, and its ruling dynasty of non-Korean ethnic origins proudly laid claim to Koguryo's heritage. The rulers of Parhae often referred to their state as the successor to Koguryo, and many of the leading families traced their ancestry to that state. But Parhae's population was predominately of groups different from those that evolved into modern ethnic Koreans." - Michael J. Seth, in A History of Korea: From Antiquity to the Present
Rajmaan (talk) 02:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Balhae was a Mohe Kingdom
Talk:Germanic weak verb

message: I have added the Afrikaans forms of the verbs to the table though the strong verb has been lost from Afrikaans, all verbs follow the weak pattern. However the past participle of Afrikaans verbs have lost the /t/ or /d/ sound. For example the past participle of werk is gewerk rather than the ancestral Dutch gewerkt.
Therefore should the initial sentence still read the following? In Germanic languages, weak verbs are those verbs that form their preterites and past participles by means of a dental suffix, an inflection that contains a /t/ or /d/ sound. Booshank 12:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for this.  I think in principle that sentence remains a fair opening, but in the case of Afrikaans the dental has been lost.  One might of course ask, since both the dental and the ablaut system have disappeared entirely, whether weak and strong are meaningful concepts in Afrikaans at all.  But that would be a discussion for the Afrikaans page, I suppose.  --Doric Loon 12:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never come across the terms 'strong' and 'weak' applied to Afrikaans verbs, I don't think one would use them if one was just looking at the Afrikaans language as the distinction between the two has been lost, but it seems useful when comparing Afrikaans with other Germanic languages. Booshank 12:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afrikaans 

message: Under General Description, shouldn't this sentence:  
In English the preterite and participle are always identical
actualy read as follows:
In English the preterite and participle of the weak verb are always identical. ?
Obviously the preterite and the past participle of to sing, for example, are not identical, but I don't want to change it because maybe I misunderstand.
Also, under "Strong and Weak", would show - showed - shown count as  a (rare) example from English?
Sukkoth 16:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strong and Weak? 

message: This article overlooks what used to be accepted into the English language. The past form of to work is, or at least used to be, "wrought." Languages are all on a trend on which they are simplifying. German, for example, now accepts both "gesandt"(strong past participle) and "gesendet"(weak past participle) for the verb infinitive "senden," which originally was classified as a strong verb. Jaundiced Zippo (talk) 20:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Gesandt is also a weak form (since it ends in -t, not -en), as is wrought (< OE worhte), but you're right that irregular weak forms tend to get replaced by regular weak forms. —Angr 08:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older English Form 

message: The commonalities of Germanic weak inflections can only be explained by their proto-forms in the parent language, and yet those aren't given here. The implied attitude of extreme empiricism/scepticism to historical reconstructions seems rather incongruent with the current state of linguistics.--77.85.55.14 (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no PG reconstruction of the weak conjugations?
Talk:Jürgen Rüttgers

message: Thanks for the further corrections to this article, though I'm very sceptical about the use of the term Prime Minister. A Prime Minister tends to refer to a single politician in control of the country's government who is second only to the official head of state, although in Germany the "Prime Minister" would actually be the Federal Chancellor (Gerhard Schröder) who officially serves under the President of the Federation (Horst Köhler). NRW is not a country in itself - it is a state much like states in America, so Prime Minister would be an inaccurate description. State President (original German: Landespräsident) would be more fitting. Jamyskis 12:46, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Guy of Lusignan

message: I notice that in popular fiction, Guy is usually portrayed as being forced on Sibylla as a husband. But the Arab chronicler Ibn Al-Athir says that Sibylla had "fallen in love with a man named Guy, a Frank recently arrived from the West. She married him, and when [Baldwin V] died, she gave the throne to her husband." Missi 10:27, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage 

message: Wait a minute!  I don't recall Saladin knocking the cup away!  Didn't he just let Reynald drink, and then declare that he had not given Reynald permission to drink when he had finished?  Other Wikipedia articles (such as Reynald's article) make no mention of Saladin interfering before Reynald had quenched his thirst.  Did this really happen or not? Roy Al Blue 00:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, he either let Raynald drink, then killed him, or didn't let him drink, then killed him, or Raynald refused to drink, then Saladin killed him anyway...depends on the source. I think what we have on Raynald's page currently is probably the most accurate. Adam Bishop 00:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether or not documentation can be found, offering water is hospitality, with all that implies. If he had let Raynald drink, it would have been against the rules of hospitality to execute him. - Tenebris  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.254.157.138 (talk) 01:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cup... 

message: I add his mother name in the infobox, but user Surtsicna undo it. I add an Ahnentafel (ancestors tree), but also Surtsicna remove it. Additionaly, she makes ungry comments. Her arguments are wrong (e.g. she said the ahnentafel has only males); what I do is similar to what exists in other pages here in WP. I cannot understand why she deletes all this stuff. Do we interested to improve the texts or not? Aris de Methymna (talk) 18:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Undo

message: King Guy is also mention in the 1963 movie epic titled “Saladin, the Victorious”.   King Guy had a arsehole that married Isabella.  But King Guy was the good guy, from the Muslim film community.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saladin_the_Victorious
User:egberts Egberts (talk) 14:47, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saladin, the Egyptian movie
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Incomplete infobox

message: It's quite compicated to add new albums to the table... —Teklund 12:50, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I wonder, if it is even usefull. --Easyas12c 00:17, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I wanted to create this for the conversion of infoboxes that use old styles.  Does that sound like a good idea? gren グレン 10:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Wikiproject Albums/Needs infobox conversion]] 

message: What does this section in the table mean? Slicing 02:16, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release formats 

message: Shall we write "none" or "0" when there are no reviews yet? Promonex 01:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Reviews 

message: Is this page still used or should it be tagged as historical/deleted? --kingboyk 16:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical?
Portal talk:Africa

message: I've just noticed that the Central African Republic article talks about elections that are due to be held in March 2005. What happened to them? Did they happen or were they posptponed/cancelled? Thryduulf 13:47, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Central African Republic

message: African architecture should look into spirituality of human made objects and how that power can empower the less privileged. Consider the principalities behind one’s own belief in perspective of human existence 105.112.37.170 (talk) 18:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  African Architecture 

message: Does anyone have any additional information to Chilinda District? It looks to me like it's a fake. There is a place in Chinsali District, but not a district. Regards Peter in s (talk) 07:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chilinda District
Talk:Louisburg College

message: This article really needs to be cleaned up.  The information here is taken directly from the Louisburg site and is not re-stated, organized, or separated into sections.  Some time soon I am going to come back and clean it up if it is not done by someone else before then.
Mike 16:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I gave this a going over and removed the cleanup tag.  It's probably still a little too detailed on the history, but I didn't want to be too reckless on this one.  I did, however, remove the claims of association with the Louisburg Male Academy, since those smelled fishy to me; it looked to me like an attempt to portray the school as that old for propaganda reasons (the text here was originally a cut-and-paste job from the school's own website). --RobthTalkCleanup? 14:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up 
Talk:Vague (club)

message: I have overhauled the article added notable sources and generally improved layout further expansion on the Vague sound and guest dj's will need expansion--Navops47 (talk) 05:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improved notability 
Talk:Allan Heinberg

message: I can't find his birthdate.  It's not listed on imdb.com -- Mareklug talk 08:18, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate 

message: Is he the same Allan Heinberg that was an actor on standby for the Broadway production of Laughter on the 23rd Floor? I spotted his name on ibdb.com. I figure there can't be that many of them out there. --GentlemanGhost 01:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadway 
Talk:Pentalene

message: A diagram of this molecule is needed.
Whoops, sorry... I was curious about this compound, and the first paper I found discussed the dianion, and I falsely assumed that's what "pentalene" referred to.  Now I see the true structure of this molecule.  I'll put up an image with it.  Ed Sanville 06:06, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Pentalene is the quintessential antiaromatic molecule. Its SMILES should be `C1=CC2=CC=CC2=C1` (kekulised). In fact, `c1c=c2ccc=c2c1` is incorrect as the bond between aromatic atoms can only be `:` —I checked and RDKit cannot load it. I'd change it myself, but I assume there's a bot or something that maintains it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.109.179 (talk) 15:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMILES is wrong
Talk:Early 2000s recession

message: Proposing merger of content, though the basic content is duplicated. I think there's some references that should make it into this article, but I wanted some other eyeballs on the articles before doing anything. mordel (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mering [[Clinton Recession]] into [[Early 2000s recession]] 

message: I placed the tag because the intro fails to define the recession, or indeed what a recession is or the time period during which this one existed (exists?).  --Thinboy00's sockpuppet alternate account 21:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  introrewrite 

message: : I believe only in January 2005, right when George W. Bush began his second term in office had the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the early 2000's recession has officially ended. You might better explain the financial impact the terrorist attacks of 9/11 had on the national and global economies, from Oct. 2001 to Dec. 2004, there was a substantial decline in economic growth and at times, very small positive economic growth to taper off by the end of 2003. Alike the early 1990's recession, this was also referred to a "mild" recession to most economic analysists. In part of the beginnings of the real estate boom from 2004 to 2007 that was profitable and the mortgage loan industry before the 2008 financial collapse brought on a larger repeat of the "mild" 2001 economic slowdown. Only the US enjoyed a slight recovery, but western Europe took longer to sort things out and mid 2000's spikes in oil prices benefited the Persian gulf states. But Japan recovered from the record 12-year recession, the longest of any developed country since the end of World War II or surpassed the late USSR in transition from communist to capitalist economics in the early 1990's.  + 71.102.2.206 (talk) 12:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recession ended in 2005 

message: The article is too superficial to understand. The root cause of the recession should be explained for it to be effective. A much detail explanation regarding the financial conditions at that period and the political status is also worth to be included. Anyhow nice article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Naveensakhamuri (talk • contribs) 11:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  insufficient info 