lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pyrford

message: I have lived in Pyrford for thity-six years.
This is a poor article.  It is largely the same as the history section of a longstanding commercial website.  It has no structure, is poorly written, contains grammatical errors and includes very little basic information about the location and nature of Pyrford as it currently exists.  I regard it as both inadequate and unrepresentative of even a standard Wiki article.
Firstly, facts within the article need to be screened, amended and regularised.  Also additions are necessary that assist in identifying Pyrford in a modern light.  I will start attempting this shortly.
Secondly, meaningful illustrations must be added to give some authentication to such a long article on a small village.  I can provide these, within the public domain.
Thirdly, it needs a capable Wiki editor to shape the article and give it a genuine Wikipedia structure - while at the same time monitoring its progress until the job is complete.  This will also mean keeping the article in perspective: Pyrford is merely one of many villages within the Borough of Woking (population circa 90,000).
JHB (talk) 19:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Website content 2006

message: Wikimedia has received a notification from Pyrford Press that the History section of this article is a copyright violation of their "Brief History of Pyrford" page.
It seems that it was added wholesale by User:Sharak on June 9 2006.
The Wayback Machine clearly shows Pyrford Press as having that content on their website prior to this - their version from December 14 2005 is here.
Accordingly, I have removed this section. --Stormie (talk) 06:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History section removed January 2008

message: Now that the sub-standard content has been removed by --Stormie (talk) I am resuming my interest and participation in contributing to this article.  First have come those Pyrford images already registered with Wikipedia, and also a refinement of the basic textual content of the article so that it accords more with local village interpretation and parlance.  Any prospective contributors or editors who are not long-term residents of Pyrford may care to contact me before inserting any significant content, in order that I can advise them whether any of their proposals need modifying so as to reflect local knowledge and detailed accuracy.
JHB (talk) 19:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Website content June 2008
Talk:Robert G. Heft

message: Why is there a See Also for Gregory Watson??? --Srwm4 09:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because they were both assigned low grades on school projects that later went on to achieve national importance.  An interesting, albeit minor, connection.  I think it merits the link. Check-Six 01:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A LOT of people got low grades in school and became world famous. National importance? To the US, you mean? There are dozens of countries where English is the first language. You seem to be assuming it's just the US. And I very much disagree that the link is merited. Einstein didn't do well in school either, just for example... 68.200.98.166 (talk) 01:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Will that old canard that "Einstein didn't do well in school" ever die? It's nonsense! Kar98 (talk) 03:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: How could he have been born in 1942 if he was 17 when he designed the flag in 1958? Reywas92Talk 23:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: he "designed" squat, just added an extra star like 1.5k other people at the same time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.220.97.79 (talk) 18:57, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: wow such little effort

message: Under the "Flag design and adoption" heading the first sentence reads:
:"There is a widespread myth on the internet that Heft designed the 50 star American Flag in 1958 while living with his grandparents".
It then goes on to state that:
:"There is no congressional record of the President considering Heft's design, and many others came up with the same design that the committee eventually adopted. While the design chosen was the same as Heft's, Heft himself was not the originator of the 50 star flag".
This creates some problems as follows:
:1. The Flag of the United States article makes the statement that Robert G. Heft did design the 50-star flag and, as such, we have one article directly contradicting another; which means that one or the other must change.
:2. This article references a piece in the Baltimore Sun which states that Robert G. Heft did design the 50-star flag and, as such, we have a source which contradicts the article that is referencing it; which once again means that one or the other must change (i.e. the article needs to change or the reference needs to be removed).
I think it's better to have a discussion here, on this Talk Page, because the Flag of the United States article is probably visited by a lot more people and should only be changed once a consensus has been reached. I will go to the talk page for the Flag of the United States article and point people over to here.
FillsHerTease (talk) 01:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Houston ... we have a problem!
Talk:Melbourne Hall

message: The info box has on two adjacent lines (a) that construction was started in the C12 and (b) that the client was Sir John Coke ... who was born in the C17. I see what’s attempted here, but it doesn’t really work well. Is there a way to clarify it and remove this confusing/amusing/unfortunate juxtaposition? Best wishes 82.34.71.202 (talk) 22:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Have made a belated attempt. KJP1 (talk) 13:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disconcerting crunch in infobox 

message: I’m planning a bit of a makeover on this. Does anyone have any objection to my using the  ref. style? I know it’s not to everyone’s taste, but it’s the one I’ve become most familiar with. There isn’t actually much that would need changing. Of the four works listed as Sources, only two are actually cited, and we don’t have page numbers for these. KJP1 (talk) 13:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference style
Talk:Toyota Dyna

message: I have seen some late '80s/early '90s Japanese imports labelled "Hiace" on the front, with "ハイエース" ("Hiace" in katakana) on the back, though they are pickup trucks identical to the Dynas/Toyoaces of the same era, which is quite confusing. Does the Hiace van share much in common with the Dyna/Toyoace? --Zilog Jones 10:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: HiAce

message: Between 1954 and 1985, the Toyoace was a much smaller version than the Dyna. The lines were then merged, but even now the Dynas are heavier duty versions and the Toyoaces are for lighter use. I have plenty of material on the earlier Toyoaces and intend to split these articles accordingly, any opposition or suggestions?  Mr.choppers | ✎  16:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Support I've got some early ToyoAce material too.  Stepho  talk  23:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?
Talk:Gothenburg Study of Children with DAMP

message: Eva Kärfve and Leif Elinder wrote letters to Gothenburg University where they accused Gillberg and Rasmussen of scientific misconduct. At which date did they write a letter? Or did they write two letters separetly? A source would be nice for this statement. Ulner 19:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct fact? 
Talk:Patrick Campbell, 3rd Baron Glenavy

message: Wikipedia's Rules say that British things must be used with British Spellings, Like wise American Things with American Spellings. As Patrick Campbell was British, British Spelling should be used. If anyone has any objections, please say below. J.J.Sagnella 10:41, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, all words in article are spelt the British way, and according to my Dictionary, both
humorist and humorous are spelt correctly and do not need an extra "u". J.J.Sagnella 10:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In any case, he was Irish, not British. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Spelling?
Talk:Thomsonfly

message: I apologize but i seem to have antecedently changed the format of the page while trying to make Thomsonfly's in alphabetical order. I apologize for any inconvenience i may have casued   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loughrey13 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed - apology appreciated MilborneOne (talk) 17:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Homepage

message: There was an incident on this airline on April 9, 2007. Could we add it into the article?Jer10 95 Talk 01:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume you mean the incident at Manchester on 29 April 2007, a bird strike is not normally notable enough for inclusion. MilborneOne (talk) 08:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this is probably the biggest thing to happen to Thomsonfly :) maybe it should be given a trial or something?Joey Boeing 777 Talk 11:12, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bird Strike
Talk:Contention

message: In Head of Line Blocking, it also mentions contention occurring inside switches. Can any expert describe how exactly this happens?
Cheers
Joe
:I'm assuming you mean networking switches. Simply put, two separate network cards are both transmitting data to a single, third one. On a 100MbE network, both of the two together can transmit at 200 Mbit/s, but the receiver only has capacity to receive 100 Mbit/s, and thus at the maximal rate, half of the packets must to be dropped. In practice however, this isn't a problem since most protocols, notably TCP, employ congestion avoidance algorithms that limit their rate and immediatelly cut back when a packet is dropped. In addition to this, most switches have some buffer space which is used when a port is already congested (see store and forward) and packets are dropped when the buffer is full. -- intgr 22:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contention in switches 

message: I have requested some articles which this page disambiguates, but which then redirect to this page be deleted. After this they will appear as redlinks for people to start those pages. Grumpyyoungman01 22:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  articles for deletion
Talk:Noël Coward Theatre

message: Why is this on Noël Coward Theatre rather than Albery Theatre, it changed its name over 30 years ago... EAi 10:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See above EAi 15:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This has been moved via copy and paste. The edit history needs to be merged with Albery Theatre. MRSC 09:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Morwen - Talk 09:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Botched move

message: Is is worth mentioning that the video/dvd of Eddie Izzard's show "Unrepeatable" was filmed at the Albery? It might be of interest to people wanting to get a look at the inside of the theatre. (The Albery is mentioned on the "Unrepeatable" page, but without a link) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.118.63.229 (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Video/dvd recorded at the Albery

message: At present the article contains two seemingly contradictory statements: "The theatre seats 872 patrons on four levels" (lead) and "Capacity
960 on 4 levels" (info-box). This could theoretically mean it seats 872 and has 88 standing places, but that seems to me unlikely. Has anyone got access to an up-to-date source that confirms the capacity of the house? Tim riley talk 13:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity
Talk:Seamus Murphy

message: I'm a newbie to wikipedia. This is an important bio. I am trying to remove spam and add a facebook page. I have flagged this profile up to local specialist for this Artist and expect there will be more contibutions. tx Ann Marie Familyandpast (talk) 15:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  this page needs editing and tidying - denisarona, please help
Talk:Rowan Lascelles

message: The line of succession on the British monarchy website only goes down to 39 places, I am not aware that any other authoritative reference work goes any further.  Therefore any claims about someone's place in the line of succession is original research, not allowed on Wikipedia.  It is not enough that someone is verifiably a descendant of monarchy, can we be sure that they are a Protestant, and that somebody higher up the list has not died or had a baby recently? PatGallacher 10:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sakuno Ryuzaki

message: But you are all fucking nerds! dammit!
:: ... So? ;) :P Lunamaria 17:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Now this is just my opinion...

message: I don't think this should belong as it's written not NPOV:
"Sakuno is a quite controversial character in the fandom. Some rabid yaoi fans don't like her since she supposedly poses a "threat" to any possible male/male pairings involving Ryoma, reaching the exteme of character bashing (by protraying her in fanworks as either an homophobic, evil bitch or a Ryoma-obsessed bimbo without any life outside of him). Some rabid het fans, obsessed with proving Ryoma's heterosexuality, twist Sakuno's personality to the extreme to make sure he falls for her and end up making her a complete Mary Sue, so altered she is. Finally, other fans tend to immediately deem her as "weak" or "without any personality" since she's sweet and quiet, sometimes to make "stronger 
females" like Ann Tachibana look better than they really are.
Many fans feel that Sakuno is often portrayed wrong, either in canon or in fanon."
Vera26 11:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fandom
Talk:Tomoka Osakada

message: This part of the article has been deleted because it is not NPOV and is definitely subjective:
"Tomoka has the dubious honor of being one of the most impopular Prince of Tennis characters in the English fandom. Some declare that she's nothing but the personification of the stereotypical rabid fangirl, others hate her merely because of either her female gender or her friendship with Sakuno. Therefore, Tomoka is usually ignored in Seigaku-centered fanfiction, or bashed in different ways (either by having other characters refer to her in unnecessarily bad terms, or by portraying her as far more shallow and over-reactive than she really is in canon). 
Tomoka's more popular fanon love intrest is Satoshi Horio. They're usually portrayed as a bickering couple that fights practically all day long, with Tomoka ultimately getting the upper hand on him - sometimes through different kinds of physical abuse, as if Tomoka was a modern version of Akane Tendo."
Vera26 10:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fandom
Talk:Nanako Meino

message: I don't think this segment is objective at all. It's a fanbase subjective opinion. I've removed it from the article:
"Like the major part of the Prince of Tennis females (except for Ann Tachibana or Sakuno Ryuzaki), Nanako is very underrated and rarely appears in fanfiction. When she is, she's mostly in the background."
Vera26 11:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fandom
Talk:Feni (liquor)

message: Trying to make some progress on improving the quality of this article.  No time today to do much, but I have found some references.  Perhaps some other editors want to get started:
Wonderful video of the feni process here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY6Qlm7Q3PI
although after watching the process, I'm far less eager to try Fenny (Distillation or not, it looks to me like a tropical bacterial paradise!)
and an article here
http://www.goanlife.com/feni/ seeems to be one of the few that isn't just a copy of this Wikipedia page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Asread (talk • contribs) 19:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement 

message: This article reads like something my grandma might have told me for a bedtime story.  It does not read like a factual, well thought out English-as-a-first-language article at all.
I have attempted to fix some of it, but it really needs someone with more skill than I to carve it into shape.
On the bright side, it does have a lot of factual information amongst the tourism-brochure material, so kudos to the original poster for doing the lion's share of the work.
Can someone flag this article for an editing makeover, please?
Danver (talk) 13:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Does not conform to wikipedia standards

message: This is a 2021 documentary about feni production.  I tried to add it to the "External links" section of the article, but my edit was immediately reverted for no reason (especially in light of the video's extremely high educational value). 173.88.246.138 (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 2021 documentary about feni production
Talk:Declaration (computer programming)

message: The code examples are interchanged, aren't they? -- 195.14.207.180 11:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code examples 

message: Initialization = definition? --Abdull (talk) 19:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initialization 

message: "For variables, definitions assign values to an area of memory that was reserved during the declaration phase." That's not correct. From The C Programming Language, Appendix 8:
Declarations specify the interpretation given to each identifier; they do not necessarily reserve
storage associated with the identifier. Declarations that reserve storage are called definitions.
Definitions in C (such as int x = 7; at the top of a function) are also declarations, but a (pure) declaration is not a definition and reserves no memory. "extern char example1;" won't reserve any memory. 81.131.65.15 (talk) 12:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declarations don't necessarily reserve memory, and if they do, they are definitions 

message: The definition of "definition" given is "definitions (declarations which provide the actual implementation in the case of functions, and initialization in the case of variables)", which is contradicted by the line below:
Here are some examples of definitions, again in C: 
char example1;  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.191.241.48 (talk) 13:49, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction pertaining to definition of "Definition" 

message: See Talk:Initialization_(programming)#Merge suggestion. A.A.Graff (talk) 04:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 

message: Make at least 2 sections. Better would be to have 2 articles.--92.193.45.68 (talk) 20:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguish between the definition of a function and a declaration of a variable.
Talk:OpenUP/Basic

message: *The OpenUP/Basic is the most agile and lightweight form of OpenUP, an open source software development process developed as part of the Eclipse Process Framework [...].
**So OpenUP is an open source software development process. Does this mean the process is open source or does it mean that it is a development process for open source software?
--Abdull (talk) 19:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Open Source"

message: Since OpenUP/Basic is now apparently called simply OpenUp, shouldn't the content from this article be merged into the OpenUP article?  Someone who knows what they're talking about should probably also explain the name change, and whether there are other forms of OpenUp anymore, or if they have different names, or whatever. --AnonymousCoward 16:46, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. I've just now merged this content into OpenUP. If I can work out how to request deletion or redirect this page there I will do so. 82.43.199.163 (talk) 13:30, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge this article into OpenUP?
Talk:Bhadrachalam

message: While article in Marathi language mr:गोदावरी नदी about :en:Godavari River is developing we seek co-operation for more information related to
*Tributaries coming from Karnatak,andhra,orisa, 
*Irrigation Projects on Godavari and Tributories 
*Urban Settelements/Cities located on bank of Godavari 
*Flood controll lines on Godavari for various cities 
*Industries and industrial pollution on Godavari 
*Translation from Marathi to English article also is welcome 
-विजय 11:07, 18 ऑगस्ट 2006 (UTC)
NGO'S:
----
1)LAMBS  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.143.154 (talk) 11:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bhadrachalam being temple town has lot of information on the temple but is out of the scope of wikipedia aims/objectives . Read Wikipedia to learn about the project . 
Bhadrachalam is also a subdivision added to that is a muncipal corporation in Khammam district .
I propose to write a summary of temple information in the article , while moving and merging the useful information to Bhadrachalam Temple --Pavithrans (talk) 16:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temple Information
Talk:Bylazora

message: Is Payonian Paionia? 
: yes Crnorizec (talk) 07:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: no, any big town/city could be "Gradiste", because that is what it means in many Slavic languages: "big city" Crnorizec (talk) 07:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Payonian]]

message: I have fixed the link in the link in the Discovery section, referring to the TFAHR Projects. Someone had changed "Republic of Macedonia" to "Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" in the title. This link and the title had been copied from the referred site as it appeared there. Don't waste my time, please. Crnorizec (talk) 07:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Politics and links, link fixed
Talk:Petar Stoyanov

message: I suggest that this page is locked for editing by unregistered members, due to the incredibly complex political situation in Bulgaria. I fear that history will be "touched up", for the purposes of forming a new political leader. --149.241.138.141 (talk) 11:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2013 protests 
Talk:Pete Dawkins

message: I think the sentence about Pete's rugby play at Oxford ("At Oxford, he won three Blues in rugby and is credited with popularizing the overarm throw (originally called the "Yankee torpedo pass") into the lineout.[3]") should be moved into or at the end of the next paragraph, after mention of his Rhodes Scholarship to attend Oxford.  It's puzzling to read about his play at Oxford before learning why he's there. Almadenmike (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move the first Oxford rugby sentence down a little? 
Talk:Pete Dexter

message: According to his book of autobiographical sketches, boxer Tex Cobb was with him when he was attacked in that bar.--Jrm2007 (talk) 20:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pete Dye

message: ----
This course is one of his in Maryland.  Great course and very difficult:
https://www.pbdyegolf.com/golf-3/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.66.87.174 (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

message: As long as he has been in the public eye, can no one come up with a photo of Pete Dye? (And none of Alice, either, I see.) --Michael K SmithTalk  20:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pete Fowler

message: Noticed the primary linked website "monsterism.net" is down and has not been up for a year or so. Feel free to add Pete Fowler's primary website as I can't find it after some quick searching.
DannyDouble (talk) 12:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monsterism down