lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:Herschelkrustofsky

message: Considering the editor Will Beback has approved removing the 'attack' section as agreeable to him and that he initiated this deletion page, I move that the portion of the 'attack' be removed and the rest remain - that this deletion be closed and we all move on. Of course that is up to everyone else. --Northmeister 02:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let's remove attack and move on

message: Continued from the project page:
 
***User pages are not articles.  The guidelines for user pages are they should avoid excessive content unrelated to Wikipedia.  The content on this user page is related to Wikipedia.  This user is not permanantly banned.  Deleting user pages of temporarily blocked editors is a particularly obnoxious form of abuse by admins who enjoy exerting their power over others.  Sort of an "add insult to injury" kind of thing.  It reminds me of the ATF raising an ATF flag over the Branch Davidian's complex after they burned it down.  The symbolism this conveys is despicable.  Herschel was only banned because of a handful of admins piling up on him like some kind of gang of "in-group" kindergarten children bullying the kid who was different.  Deleting his user page is just plain juvenile.  This is the first time I have ever cast a keep vote on anything here, which should say something.  If this were posted as a POV fork of criticism of Wikipedia I would have said delete, but it's a user page not an article.  Let it stay.  KleenupKrew 20:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My statements were not false. HK was banned for a year by the ArbCom, with no input from me or any other admin that I'm aware of. All of his article edits promoted LaRouche theories and positions. I'm far less obessed with LaRouche than you, as all of your edits have been connected to LaRouche. I presume you know HK peronally, as you haven't edited here in months prior to voting here. -Will Beback 21:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Jamalpur, Bihar

message: There was a Sufi saint baba Jamal that was lived here, on the behalf of his name this is known as Jamalpur. Krishna9973 (talk) 02:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Jamalpur is termed as this name?
Talk:Teriyaki Boyz

message: Taken from article:
The Japan Times called the Boyz "four of Japan's most charismatic and least annoying Japanese MCs" and described the album as an "engaging and exciting...superstar comp".
Surely this is selective or even mis-citation? The second quote is taken from the following paragraph:
No one ever gives their 100 percent on these superstar comps, and "Beef or Chicken" suffers from a similar fate. But, ultimately, there's something adequately engaging and exciting about the cross-continental possibilities contained within.
The album is described as a superstar comp, but it's the "cross-continental possibilities" that are described as engaging and exciting. And, regardless, the article itself was far from a shining review, so this article shouldn't portray it as such.
B'man 02:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * Looks to me like the album was described as "engaging and exciting". I don't see any misquote. --JJay 02:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:413fclips-lrg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:413fclips-lrg.jpg
Talk:Lace monitor

message: you need to include adaptations
: ok Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: unsigned undated suggestion

message: *this Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: bookmark

message: Nice one,  I got some ideas for the article I was working on. There is a sand goanna complex that separated Varanus rosenbergi and left Varanus gouldii (s.s.) and this species unresolved: distribution overlap / potential hybrids / ecological distinctions etc. I tried to outline this at the latter article, it could probably be clearer.  cygnis insignis 14:20, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm okay, what is the source? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm, those are in the article. :| cygnis insignis 03:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  complex 

message: The lace monitor is are apex predator, and l can give multiple arguments. On adult lace monitor hunts only crocodiles and dingoes. If crocodiles can only catch them in the water, and monitor lizards usually prefer to move on land, thus crocodiles very rarely intersect with variegated monitor lizards, let alone hunt them, then dingoes hunt either sick or small adults.  There is nothing to talk about wedge-tailed eagles.  A few cases have been recorded, but this is very rare, and it is likely that all incidents were from an ambush. Амангелді Бексұлтан (talk) 07:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Your "arguments" are beside the point if you cannot provide a reliable, working source (i.e. not a dead link to a dubious source) that explicitly states this. See WP:OR. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lace monitor are apex predator 

message: There are three articles on Wikipedia about this lizard. Should they be merged? Budgewoi (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lace monitor]] | [[Monitor Lizard]] | [[Goanna]]
Talk:List of American architects

message: I do not object to including the names of the founders of Asymptote as listed in the appropriate article in the list, but I don't think an agency needs to be listed here. I would think that most agencies with that kind of clout already have fairly notable people working for them, so the founder names may be just as recognizable as, or moreso than, a company name. -- Omicronpersei8 02:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Asymptote

message: if anybody wants to try and fix this list with me leave a message on my talk page.RYNORT 21:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is still missing an introduction. I've added one, based loosely on similar lists. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the list seems to include architecture practices too. Sionk (talk) 14:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: help with fixing the list

message: Why is this a list instead of just using a category?  RJFJR (talk) 16:53, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why not a category?
Talk:Claireville Conservation Area

message: The conservation area is called Claireville (two e's) so it should be renamed. --142.150.48.163 02:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; see also the discussion at Claireville, Ontario. The page has been moved. Mindmatrix 18:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem with moving the article here.Lobo 21:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: In May and June the city of Toronto released two new maps and they both show the name of the park as Clairville. (??) A Hiking map and a biking map. Both the paper versions and the PDFs on their site say Clairville.  There is a road that runs along side the park and ITS name is Claireville. weird. Hubert Derus 02:58, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; Toronto does refer to it as Clairville. It seems to be in the minority, though, as google searches indicate greater usage of Claireville (~10000 hits, see this) versus Clairville (~500 hits - see this). I'm going to try to contact various naming authorities to try to clear this up, but I suspect the version with the 'e' is correct. Mindmatrix 15:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Check with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Since they own the place they should be the final arbiter. --70.51.142.223 15:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, its Claireville.  Found a sign today, its by the East gate...  I just made a bunch of additions, i know i missed a link somewhere. Its late. Hubert Derus 03:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Biomedical tissue

message: The one thing this article is not about is 'Biomedical tissues', but instead is about the regulation of the use of such tissues. The 'object' itself is covered in organ transplant and Transplantation. I agree each of those articles do not clearly set out a description of the regulations, but instead concentrates more on the ethical issues. 
So would this article-stub be better renamed as Transplantation regulation ? David Ruben  Talk  02:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Betty Reynolds Cobb

message: I am the author of this article and I was only able to find a few sources of information on my topic. If anyone knows where I can find additional information, could you please let me know? Gsublemon (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Sources 

message: I am the author of this article and I have tried several times to "unorphan" my article. Can someone please help me introduce links to this page from similiar pages?Gsublemon (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan Article 

message: Hello! I am Gsublemon and I have been adding to the Betty Reynolds Cobb article as a college project. I am new to wikipedia and open to any of your revision and editing contributions. Your feedback on my article will be greatly appreciated! 141.165.143.37 (talk) 23:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New to Wikipedia 

message: I am Gsublemon and i recently edited the Betty reynolds Cobb page. My footnotes did not come out right. Instead, they fully posted in the texrt. How do i fix this? Gsublemon (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct format for footnotes 

message: Hello! I am Gsublemon and my article has been classified as an orphaned artile. Can someone please help me link my article to more related-topic articles. Gsublemon (talk) 03:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  orphaned article 
Talk:Titular ruler

message: I am going to add some historical and current examples of titular rulers, with documentation, to meet the problems of referenceing.  It may be several weeks before I get to this. Unschool 18:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plans 

message: The Queen of England shouldn't be used as an example for a titular leader as by definition A titular ruler, or titular head, is a person in an official position of leadership who possesses few, if any, actual powers. As the Queen serves as the head of Armed forces and that all public offices in the government be it MP's or the Prime-minister swear oath to the monarch it would defeat the purpose and definition. There has been no physical exercise of authority in recent times that overrule the government however, this doesn't mean it cannot be exercised. --Olowe2011 (talk) 10:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen of England
Talk:Jack Adams (ice hockey, born 1919)

message: There's a discussion at Talk:Jack Adams about whether there is a dominant Jack Adams which should be at Jack Adams as per WP:D.  Please comment at Talk:Jack Adams so that all discussion is in one place. Dpmuk (talk) 11:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a dominant 'Jack Adams'?
Template talk:Steels

message: There seems to be some confusion in this template about the differences between the phases of steel and the various microstructures. Carbon-iron alloy systems only have four phases, which are ferrite (including all allotropes), cementite, graphite and austenite. These phases combine in various ways to form different microstructures, which are sphereoidite, pearlite, bainite, martensite and ledeburite. Alloy-steels, on the other hand, may have other phases, such as nickel-ferrite, but I think that would need to be a whole different template. 
Personally, I think the phases and microstructures should be separated under different heading within this template. I'd do it myself, but have no idea how. Zaereth (talk) 20:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phases and microstructures
Talk:Forms of juggling

message: The image is labled as Jay Gilligan and Jouni Temonen in this article, but in the main article on [juggling], the other juggler is labled as Kristen Wanvick. Who is it? 
136.142.22.231 03:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jugglers in image caption

message: What about "inverted juggling"? See Youtube - inverted juggling on a piano. I'm trying to figure out if it's for real - anyone know? 82.69.28.55 18:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's "Bounce Juggling" and is already listed under "Ball Juggling".  As for the YouTube video.  He is juggling, but he's not actually playing the pianno.  The whole thing is a pressure sensor that automatically plays the notes in the right order when it's hit with a ball.  So he has to hit it at the right time, but not in the right place.  Popstar dave 04:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inverted juggling

message: Is anyone else unhappy with the format of this page?  I feel that listing "Numbers", "Trick" and "Technical" under each of the "Balls", "Clubs" and "Rings" headings is redundant.  I believe that a pretty major format overhaul is in order.  This should be possible without affecting the content of the page.  
If no one has any major disagreements, I'll make these changes.
Popstar dave 04:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Format of the Article 
Category talk:Simon Templar books

message: I decided to name this category after Simon Templar instead of The Saint (which is the proper series title) as I feel calling this "Saint books" might be confusing as there may well be a similar category relating to religious works. Also Simon Templar is the main article anyway. 23skidoo 03:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I used the term "books" not "novels" as the Templar canon includes short story and novella collections as well as full novels. I added the NovelsWikiProject tag anyway. 23skidoo 18:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Simon Templar and not "Saint"
Talk:Digipak

message: Perhaps should  be in article: Who were among the very first bands/labels to use these? Did they start off small and local, or was a major label the first client? (i'll ask refdesk if noone knows/finds-out in the next few weeks.) -Quiddity 03:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Early adopters?

message: I remember a few websites and newsgroup postings in the early- mid-90s that referred to Digipack packaging as "digicrap" because the cardboard gets worn out over time and then the album art looks like crap. --Jimj wpg 22:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Digicrap

message: His article says he invented it but he doesn't seem to be mentioned on this page. Does anyone know If he did have a hand in making it.(Morcus (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon Le Bon
Talk:Deosai National Park

message: recently a indian editor has been preying on pakistani articles by adding the POV terms from indian side and removing valid disputed tags from indian administered territory i urge all editors to watch out for his anti pakistan vendeta he has a habbit of running to admins and slying his words with them to get his pro indian garbage POV through pakistani articles look at his edit history 86.162.68.36 (talk) 21:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This user is initiated personal attacks and they are a sockpuppet of a blocked vandal Nangparbat. Please revert all edits this user makes as this user is guilty of multiple block evasions. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Watch out for indian editor grey

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Hope Island

message: This probably should be a primary article on Hopen-Eiland with a top link to Captain Planet.  Unfortunately I don't have any more information to add.--66.92.238.5 03:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it under Hopen--66.92.238.5 03:43, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Loren Mazzacane Connors

message: hmm... this seems to have been written by a non-native english speaker. kudos for putting out the effort, but i hope someone knowledgeable can help clean up the language. it's a bit confusing in spots.
:Cleaned up, but it could still do with more work. I'll try and find sources for the material that's already there, and maybe a discography. Cheers, Sam Clark 16:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OK, not very much research was required to discover that this page was a potentially copyright-violating cut-and-paste from Connors's website. I've replaced it with what I can find. But to be honest, I don't know that much about Connors - although I have, and love, several of his albums. Anyone know more? Cheers, Sam Clark 17:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Valtellina

message: Dear users,
after some research about the cultural heritage of Valtellina for the university project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/UNIBG I have added some information to the page. In particular, I have added the section "Folklore" enriching it with information connected to the traditional events of the valley.
I also added two pictures for which I obtained the authorisation from the owner.
Best regards,
User: Alessandra Valmadre  — Preceding undated comment added 08:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribution to the section "folklore" 

message: The article does not take into account the actual authoritative ital. Disciplinare. The DISCIPLINARE DI PRODUZIONE DEI VINI A DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA “VALTELLINA ROSSO” O "ROSSO DI VALTELLINA" and the DISCIPLINARE DI PRODUZIONE DEI VINI A DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA E GARANTITA "VALTELLINA SUPERIORE".
Therefore the description is wrong in several points:
1. The DOC and DOCG wines both require a minimum percentage of Nebbiolo of 90%.
2. For the DOC wines, the maximum yield is 10 tons of grapes/hectare (and for DOCG wines 8 tons).
3. DOC wines must be aged for at least 6 months, DOCG wines for at least 24 months and DOCG wines with the additional designation Riserva for at least 36 months.
4. The minimum alcohol content for DOC wines is 11% and for DOCG wines 12%.
5. Grumello, Inferno and Valgella aren't villages, but only wine-growing subzones. Opas Eifel (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wines
Talk:Gregory Douglas

message: Is th is the same guy who wrote the funny essay attacking david irving? 
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/NetLoss/Irving/Irving-GregoryDouglasSkewersIrving-Fakes&FraudsII.htm
Very amusing, but if he is a forger, how am I to believe his facts? 24.202.13.239 03:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I do not see anything in this article that indicates the category 'Holocaust denial' or 'Holocaust denier' is appropriate.  Can someone help here? Hmains 00:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gregory Douglas has been removed from the category Category:Holocaust deniers. Remember Wikipedia libel rules. The article makes no mention of Gregory Douglas having been identified as a holocaust denier. Further, per WP:NOR and WP:V et al, simply providing links to comments by Mr. Christie which an editor considers holocaust denail is not sufficient. To cagetogize Gregory Douglas as such, the claim must first be qualified by reliable sources. Thank you. --Uncle Bungle 20:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Denial

message: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_172#Gregory_Douglas_and_TBRNews.org Location (talk) 18:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference
Talk:Online codes

message: The section removed by anonymous user 81.208.61.202 was copied nearly verbatim from the academic paper in the second link (Section 2) from the article. If he/she has any objections as to the accuracy of the deleted statement, that person should state those reasons here. As it stands now, this latest redaction comes across as an immature act of censorship, if not blatant vandalism. Perhaps that section could have explained more clearly that the encoding blocks took O(1) time to generate. If that was the point of contention, the statement should have simply been corrected instead of deleted entirely. If the whole of the statement is scientifically inept, do please explain why for the edification of non-math/compsci geeks such as myself. --PacoBell 03:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense?
Talk:Genocide (novel)

message: I somehow don't think that this is the correct book cover....
Clofts (talk) 09:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly could do with an uploaded image of the book cover.--DrWho42 (talk) 21:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Book Cover?

message: If Jo Grant and UNIT are in this book, I assume it's set in the 1970s. Could somebody find out the exact setting (the sypnosis on the back cover of the book would probably mention this) and add it to the article? Digifiend (talk) 11:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jo and UNIT
Talk:Kursaal (novel)

message: So what about the Kursaal featured as as a British landmark on the new postage stamp issue? 217.43.255.190 (talk) 09:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

message: Either seems an odd main heading in an encyclopedia article. Jerome`s wonky apostrophe 14:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blurb or blurby