lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rhyssoplax aerea aerea

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Rhyssoplax aerea huttoni

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Rhyssoplax canaliculata

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Soyuz 7K-T No.39

message: The article states that both kosmonauts were rescued in 'excellent health'. Yet, the article about Lazaryev states that he was injured. 62.87.244.55 (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Excellent Health?

message: : I believe the article should be updated to show the abort sequence for the Soyuz 18a mission originated with a crew request, rather than a sensor. Certainly the sensor-generated abort story was officially issued to the press by Russian authorities, however, it may be worthwhile stating that it was 'a' story that was issued.
: The flight was both not a disaster and can only marginally be called a failure. Certainly the crew didn't carry out the mission objectives, however the crew and the ground controllers were at all times in control of the spacecraft. If they wanted to continue with the mission into space, there is nothing I can find that suggests they were unable to do so. Makarov, decided he didn't want to continue, and told the ground controllers to abort the mission, due to the design of the craft at that time, the crew could not abort a mission from within the craft, it had to be done from the ground control. Makarov was an experienced cosmonaut and also helped to design the craft he was flying at the time, so I think it's worth updating the page, as it is all available somewhere or other.....Makarov probably erred on the side of caution because of vibrations he felt. However, it's beyond me which decision would have been better, as the landing caused an injury to his crewmate, and who knows if the craft would have reached orbit anyway.
Penyulap (talk) 15:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly someone has references to the type of craft that was used at the time, anything to shed light on the kind of abort control it has, and how it works, that may lend credibility to one or more of the versions of this story ?Penyulap (talk) 03:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abort sequence 
Talk:Rhyssoplax chathamensis

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Rhyssoplax clavata

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Rhyssoplax stangeri

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Rhyssoplax suteri

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Gyeongheo

message: the infobox and birth cat give 1846; the lede gives 1849; at least one source (Kyongho, 1999) gives 1846. Not sure if a definitive date can be pinned down...--FeanorStar7 11:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: birth year discrepancy

message: two recent articles in major south korean newspapers about him. he is very notable; i found these links in like 5 seconds toobigtokale (talk) 23:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Template talk:Bus operators in Scotland

message: : This Template was created to indicate operators of buses in Scotland. Whilst the 'Regional' section is in no way exhaustive, operators have only been included if a Wikipedia article exists on them. This is in contrast to the 'Bus Companies of England' template, which has blurred the lines between 'bus' and the more general title 'public transport'. Rather than the corporations that own the individual operators (such as First plc, Stagecoach, ComfortDelGro etc. owning for example 'First Aberdeen', 'Stagecoach Strathtay' or 'Citylink'), this template was created to display the operators themselves (First Aberdeen, Stagecoach Strathtay and Citylink etc.), rather than the parent company.
Please also remember that Scotland is not a region in the same way that the North-West of England is, for example. If anyone wishes to create a seperate template displaying the Public Transport Corporations that are owners of many of the Bus companies listed here, then please do so. 212.139.102.52 (talk) 15:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Scottish–Norwegian War

message: I'm glad to see someone finally got round to writing this article, which I was planning to do when I wrote Battle of Largs! However, it contains some inaccuracies and some mistakes. I corrected some, but will probably correct more later. The narrative surrounding the battle of Largs is inaccurate here, and is (in all modesty) better described in the article on the battle.--Barend (talk) 15:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. A much needed article. I have a Scottish history book I'll look into for some information, will do that tomorrow. Manxruler (talk) 22:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies

message: Hello.
1.The battle of Largs is considered a minor skirmish, both by contemporary norwegian sources and eyevitnesses, and by historians today. 
2. King Haakon did NOT attack the Scots at Large. Some of his ships stranded at Largs during a storm, were they got attacked by the Scots. At the end of the "battle" both forces withdrew, and bot sides claimed victory. The "battle" ended indecisive.
3. You refer to a "Family genalogy site" as sources. 
I will delete your account of the battle,  unless you provide adequate sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattamatikk (talk • contribs) 11:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not a well made article 
Talk:Criminal defense lawyer

message: this is the worst article i've ever seen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.144.200 (talk) 07:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I know this article is hurting for sources already, but as part of a cleanup of this article, if one can find a decent source, it might be worth mentioning that, at least in the U.S., attorneys often combine criminal defense (criminal prosecution being done by (assistant) district attorneys who typically don't practice other law at the same time) and representing plaintiffs in civil cases (like personal injury) (many defendants in civil cases being big companies with their own retained counsel). Kevin Lamoreau (talk) 23:12, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminal defense/civil offense connection 
Talk:Canyon Lake Gorge

message: Moved by User:JoshuaZ
Can people poke at ? I'm worried that there's too much weight being given to a fringe creationist movement in that article, though probably unintentionally. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 03:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks alright to me. The weight problem is probably because the article is undeveloped. Also... shouldn't thread this be on a project page somewhere?--Tznkai (talk) 03:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno. Just didn't want to deal with it myself. Have enough troubles in other areas =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 04:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Did some googling, there are more references which should be added, and most of the YEC info belongs in the flood geology article rather than that one. So many diversions! dave souza, talk 17:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

text: It seemed like undue weight to me. I've removed it. Unless there are reliable sources talking about what the YECs are saying it is clearly undue weight. If there are reliable sources talking about what the YECs are saying about that canyon then it might make sense to include. JoshuaZ (talk) 17:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I thought of that but was wondering if it's worth a brief dismissive mention for the creos that will inevitably find the article. However, my googling didn't reveal any mention on NCSE, TOA or Scienceblogs, so no reliable secondary source found so far. . . dave souza, talk 20:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  That means that there are no sources about the matter responding from the perspective of mainstream science. That's a distinct claim from there being no reliable sources. But FWIW I can't find even a local newspaper mentioning the YEC connection about the Canyon so its not an issue. Maybe we should move this discussion to the talk page of the article so it doesn't clutter this one up (where it is a bit OT) and where it can be easily found for future reference? JoshuaZ (talk) 21:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's claimed to be science, my view is that a mainstream source of some sort is needed, but as you say they're all primary sources so far, and nothing to establish notability. Good idea to move the discussion. . dave souza, talk 21:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from ID page
Talk:Cemusa

message: Speedy deletion, indeed. This article wasn't even up for a minute when it got tagged. The company is notable. Even if you put aside the fact that a similar company like JCDecaux has its own article, Cemusa has contracts to serve advertising in prominent public areas in some of the biggest metropolitan areas worldwide, including New York City, one of the world's advertising capitals. As such, the company is also a big target of the inevitable anti-capitalists and complaints about advertising oversaturation. I've cited three New York Times articles about the company. So in short, the subject of the article is notable. --Jtalledo (talk) 15:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  That was quick
Talk:St. Augustine Academy (Ventura, California)

message: This is a start on this school article. Further advice is available at the school project page.
1. Add some topics (like history, notable alumni, etc)
2. Keep adding references
3. Add pictures
4. Ask for an assessment at the schools project.EagleFan (talk) 15:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Wakefield Cathedral

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Top Withens

message: "Holes were made in the wall...and around 30 windows were almost completely removed." I assume by the storm? And the story ends with a lost meal? Please, remove unimportats things, keep to encyclopedic wording, and add the missing parts!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.71.66.105 (talk) 10:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Come now.  You really had to "assume" that the damage to the house on May 18, 1893, was caused by the thunderstorm? 2600:6C5D:5A00:B1D:7502:C0D:66C7:E30D (talk) 22:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
File talk:The Story Girl.png

message: 
I believe this image was copied from Virtual Museum of Canada. Please compare with this Enlarge Photo. 
The Museum has Copyright page and it is written:
All images are embedded with a watermark tracking symbol (Digimarc); images are not for use by any party outside of the Virtual Museum of Canada Partnership for "Picturing a Canadian Life: L.M. Montgomery's Personal Scrapbooks and Book Covers".
This is what the owner of the photo image claiming. So, two questions arise.
* Does US have right to copy the copyrighted material of Canada?
* Does this article suitable for viewing from Canada?
I'm not going to disturb other people's contribution but I believe intentionally uploading the copyrighted photo image of the Virtual Museum of Canada, which is even implanted watermark technic to be able to detect the illegal use, and release it in Wikipedia as public domain in the United States would not desirable situation. Tolena (talk) 15:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Violation of Canadian Copyright
Talk:Controversies involving Don Bradman

message: No mention of the stockbroker controversies, setting up a business overnight using the company's client list behind closed doors without bidding for them as per the norm?--203.219.25.14 (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I propose moving this article to Controversies involving Donald Bradman per naming convention Donald Bradman Harrias (talk) 15:19, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Move
Talk:Impulse

message: The current impulse article is devoted to the technical meaning in mechanics. However, for the global WP readership, other meanings such as impulse (psychology) may be just as important, or more.  Shouldn't it be the case to let impulse be this disamb page, and rename the current impulse article to impulse (mechanics)?  All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to swap  the disamb page with "impulse" article 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Impulse (disambiguation) → Impulse
* The previous "Impulse" article was already moved to Mechanical impulse and is now a redirect. Completing the move of this dab page was contested on the grounds of being potentially controversial. Per the previous comment above, the word "impulse" is used as a title for many different subjects, and there is no demonstration of any primary topic. Hence, in lieu of any actual objections, I am requesting that this page be moved. Ham Pastrami (talk) 18:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service

message: still don't know how I get to join and who it's run by
lol
seriously, we need to who astronomical union is  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.61.161 (talk) 23:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  still don't know how I get to join and who it's run by 

message: Link to GCF Coordinating Centre actually links to Wikipedia article on the Open Grid Forum, an entirely unrelated matter.
A naive search on the Web yielded no appropriate results for "GCF Coordinating Centre". To correct the link I need more information from the author. Gdayton (talk) 21:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was "GGF Coordinating Centre"; what they may have meant is the "Global Geophysical Fluids Centre", which would be the "GGF Centre", with no "Coordinating" (perhaps that was there when it was founded), and which was founded on January 1, 1998.  That's what I replaced it with. Guy Harris (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GCF Coordinating Centre not known