lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:NSTAR (company)

message: :NStar and sister companies renamed Eversource Energy ...
:www.bostonglobe.com/business/.../nstar.../story.html
:The Boston Globe
:Jan 7, 2015 - Northeast Utilities, the parent company of NStar and the Western Massachusetts Electric Company, said that it would change its name and the ...
-71.174.183.177 (talk) 02:22, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2015 name change to Eversource Energy 
Talk:NRG Energy

message: "NRG Energy: The Most Volatile Stock in the S&P 500 Utilities"
http://marketrealist.com/2016/11/nrg-energy-volatile-stock-sp500-utilities/
:Well, in New York anyways, they own a lot of generators that don't produce any energy for any utility, but they do influence policy quite a bit at the nyiso, so I wouldn't know what to call them exactly.Smellyshirt5 (talk) 01:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NRG is a utility company rather than an energy company ?
Talk:Lansquenet

message: Commentary like "Sometimes there is a run of several consecutive winnings; but on one occasion, on board one of the Cunard steamers, a banker at the game turned up in his own favour I think no less than eighteen times." sounds like the author pasted a few lines from a 19th century book without citation. I'll try to track down the source, but the article should be cleaned up regardless.
--unsigned by 72.226.233.13, 16:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The book is "The Gaming Table Volume I" by Andrew Steinmetz (BiblioBazaar reprint). It's in the public domain by now (I'd assume) but it should be attributed correctly. And is a description of how people used to cheat at this game in the 19th century really relevant? Factomancer (talk) 01:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Informal commentary 

message: "having the option at any moment of giving up the bank"
Does the author really mean ANY moment? This is very confusing. What becomes of the banker's stakes if he pulls out? Does the next banker keep on playing the started "hand"? I suspect what is probably meant is that the banker can only retire voluntarily directly after a win. On a related matter, it also needs be noted when the deck is shuffled. And if possible it would be interesting to know what kind of deck was used during what historical periods and in what areas. --BjKa (talk) 13:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear playing details
Talk:Now Software

message: Some Now Utilities-related pages I found awhile ago:
*  The Wall Street journal book of personal technology, Walter S. Mossberg
*  1991 article on version 3.0 in TidBITS
*  Bundled with Now Utilities by Now Software per http://mediamall.com/nowmedia/drmac/dm980601.html and http://tidbits.com/static/html/TidBITS-045.html, and InfoWorld article from Sep 10, 1990 in Product Pipeline
*  Brief info in Computerworld Oct 29, 1990
*  Super Boomerang, 25 Feb 1991 by Adam C. Engst] in TidBITS
*  Boomerang makes good  -- by Hiro Yamamoto n TidBITS
*  MacWEEK -- 11-Sep-90, Vol. 4, #30, pg. 31
*  InfoWorld -- 01-Oct-90, Vol. 12, #40, pg. 46 at GBooks Now Readies Major Upgrade of Utilities: Version 2.0 Includes Enhanced Boomerang by Eric Lach
*  InfoWorld, Volume 12, Issues 40-44
*  Macintosh hard disk management - Bob Brant, p 281 & Fig 10-16
*  Software reviews on file, Volume 8-- Facts on File, Inc
*  SunExpert, Volume 7, Issues 7-12
*  Murphy's laws of Macs, Maria Langer, Sybex, 1993
Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In particular, SuperBoomerang could be covered. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now Utilities
Talk:Novation Digital Music Systems

message: Today started filling out this page. I've removed the "stub" indicator as I think it no longer is one. I have focused mainly on the (essentially new) History section so far. I have NOT included additional references at this time as I intend to get the copy into some kind of shape and then come back and address the references. Once this is done I intend to fill out the Product section with a line or so about each product. I may also arrange them chronologically instead of by functionality as the products get increasingly hybrid as time goes by in many cases. Should also note that the logo needs an update. The name is fine but the "n" used now is different. Richard E (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Norton Rose Fulbright

message: Norton Rose Group
Information updated in light of Ogilvy Renault and Deneys Reitz joining Norton Rose Group; Key people added; Expertise areas added; Number of lawyers, employees and offices updated; ‘History’ amended to show NR OR LLP and NRSA are now a part of NRG.
Group added to ‘Norton Rose’ to make ‘Norton Rose Group’. Officially, Norton Rose does not exist. It should either be presented as the relevant entity (e.g. Norton Rose Studio Legale) or as Norton Rose Group when talking about the practice collectively. Please do not remove the word Group from Norton Rose Group when referring to it in text.
09 June 2011
----------------------------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.116.24.237 (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There have been several single use accounts/editors that have puffed up the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Histnewbie (talk • contribs) 00:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Lê Huỳnh Đức

message: This article (which I've just added as a reference) states that Đức has 60 caps for the national football team, but the infobox says 63. Where is that number coming from? If 63 is the correct number, we need a reliable source to back it up. Note that the Vietnam national football team article gives 60 caps as well. --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 19:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caps 

message: Huynh Duc is overall top goalscorer at Tiger Cup with 14 goal. He is 3rd place overall top goalscorer at Asean Football Championship if count as Tiger Cup and AFF Cup  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annas86 (talk • contribs) 10:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall goal scorer at Tiger Cup 
Talk:Northern Light Group

message: The company was founded in September of 1995 - not in 1996: Mark Sprague  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.253.55 (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

message: Hi Not a Tech Guy.  The folders were to the left of the search result.  You did not have to click on a folder to see the search results.  The folders could be used to refine a search by subject, but they were strictly value add.  You appear to have confused Northern Light with another search engine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.75.29 (talk) 18:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  correction 

message: I'm not a tech guy, so maybe I am wrong, but iirc, the consumer side of the northern light search engine was insanely stupid: it returned hits in folders, 10 hits/folder, so instead of seeing list of hits on your screen, you saw alist of folders, F1, F2 . .
and to see the hits you had to click on each folder, one by one
their slogan was something like "the web in folders, as it should be"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.17.105 (talk) 16:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  bad article
Talk:An Yong-hak

message: He isn't North Korean. His family is from South Korea and he went to North Korean run school to preserve his Korean cultural and ethnic Identity. 
Stop saying his North Korean. Their is no North Korean born or origin living in Japan. Majority of them are South Koreans attended North Korean run schools.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teacherjj1 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eversource Energy

message: Is it true that in the 1980s Public Service of New Hampshire was so successful at getting its customers to conserve energy that it later went to the PUC to obtain a rate increase to offset the lost revenue?  RJFJR (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Conservation induced rate hike?

message: It should be mentioned that the deal with hydroquebec is very unpopular with New Hampshire residents, and will likely not be approved.--76.179.233.115 (talk) 02:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Northern pass

message: What about the 1.2 Gw Seabrook Station?  Who owns it?  Who runs it? Surely Northeast Utilities via PSNH? Huw Powell (talk) 00:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  PSNH 

message: The article names Hartford and Boston as corporate headquarters. Fortune magazine says the headquarters is Springfield, Mass. Do we know which is accurate and up to date? Stephenbharrison (talk) 03:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Springfield is the corporate HQ per Bloomberg  and Dunn & Bradstreet , so I'd say that the Hartford & Boston addresses are deprecated. Markvs88 (talk) 03:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporate Headquarters 

message: — Assignment last updated by TotalSolarEclipse (talk) 23:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: NAS 348 Global Climate Change
Talk:Battle of Neretva (film)

message: Moved 'The Battle of Neretva' article to 'Battle of Neretva (film)' page. This should reflect better the subject of the article, and avoid confusion with the 'Battle of Neretva' article. Gaston200 (talk) 11:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Undone. You did not "move" the article, you copy and pasted it elsewhere, without any previous discussion. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, we really ought to move... Battle of Neretva and The Battle of Neretva shouldn't be two different articles. However, I have a question. The Neretva is a river, shouldn't the title be "Battle of the Neretva"?? If the movie is titled simply "Battle of Neretva", shouldn't the name of the actual historic engagement be "Battle of the Neretva"? --DIREKTOR (TALK) 18:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I real move, if discussed, is fine. However, that isn't what he did. He did a copy-paste thing. I've put in a request to do the actual move. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Premiere of the film was in November 29 (Day of Republic in former SFRY) during opening of Skenderija center. -- Bojan  10:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Austin Peay

message: The following content was copied from Talk:Austin Peay IV, a page that now redirects to this page:
Austin Peay IV??
Governor Austin Peay (1876-1927) was not Austin Peay IV.  Austin Peay IV is the descendant of the original Austin Peay. Can someone correct this on Wikipedia?  Drsowell 19:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, his gravestone reads "Austin Peay IV," which is causing the confusion.  Bms4880 (talk) 00:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if his father was also Austin Peay, which is what the article says, then it seems that he would have been at least "Austin Peay, Jr." or "Austin Peay II".  2600:1004:B144:5853:F820:92D0:2F7E:92A6 (talk) 02:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Content merge from [[Talk:Austin Peay IV]]

message: Some early records suggest Peay used the middle name "Leavell" (his mother's maiden name).  If there are any other verifiable records or sources that show Peay using this name, post here before editing.  BrineStans (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle name
Talk:North Fork Brewery

message: Adding a notability tag.
97.113.105.182 (talk) 03:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?
Talk:Norkom

message: Any claims about how Norkom sizes up against its competition need to be well-sourced by reliable third-parties.  Gartner is a good one.  I have dug up a few others for the other statements, but as they are non-notable (i.e. don't have their own articles), I'm not sure they meet WP:RS . Steve CarlsonTalk 07:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Crownhill

message: I propose merging Plumer Barracks into Crownhill there is no WP:sigcov of Plumer barracks but they are mentioned already in the Crownhill article so it can be merged there. Tim Landy (talk) 11:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment I have expanded the article quite a bit giving it quite a bit more coverage. Hopefully, this will enable you to withdraw the proposal. Dormskirk (talk) 12:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Don't Merge I agree the article is better now, good effort to get that done so quickly! I will still leave this discussion open for the 7 days in case others wish to comment. Tim Landy (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Tim That's great. Many thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 15:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal plumer barracks into Crownhill
Talk:Philips Norelco

message: This page is lacking in the history of logos, and I hope that this conversation will make this Wiki page more attractive to the Norelco fans.
Between 1964 and 1985, the Norelco logo was an italicized, angular-looking "script" logo. This was perhaps the longest running logo. During 1985, they replaced this logo with the "circle N" logo, with the Norelco name in a modernized font. As early as about 1979, the Norelco name also appeared in an extended, Euro-style font, as seen on some coffeemakers and the Chic line of hair care products including hair dryers.
WikiPro1981X (talk) 01:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norelco Logos History 

message: Another aspect this Wiki page should be devoted to is its slogans.
The year 1985 had not only seen the all-new "Circle N" logo, but also a new slogan to go with it: "We Put Quality First." Now, all Norelco fans please add to this conversation and Wiki. Thank you.
WikiPro1981X (talk) 01:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norelco Slogans
Talk:Man Pei Tak

message: * Can someone please dont change the player statistics again... The statistics is for senior club appearances and goals counted for the DOMESTIC league only. That means it should include league matches such as Hong Kong First Division League, but not Hong Kong Senior Shield and Hong Kong FA Cup. I have revised this some many times already... 
Checkiema 10:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Noranda (mining company)

message: Edmond Horne is not actually the Founder of this company.  He was the prospector who discovered the orebody that the company was formed to exploit.  The Company was formed by the US syndicate that financed his expedition.  I will track down a good source and edit and cite accordingly. Turgan (talk) 05:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edmond Horne
Talk:Nonesuch Records

message: Having the entire catalogue seems totally gratuitous, so I'm getting rid of that section. Discussion is welcome. SingCal (talk) 07:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record Catalogue 

message: Hello,
We at Nonesuch Records noticed that there were a few errors in our existing Wikipedia entry and that a good deal of what we felt was interesting information on the label's history was missing. In order to promote transparency, we've added this information under the user name "Nonesuch Records." It has come to our attention that this might be construed as self-promotion. We feel that we are adding information in a reasonably unbiased tone, beyond the pride we take in discussing the many of the projects and artists with whom we have worked over the years.
We look forward to hearing the community's response, and hope you will find the history we have provided enjoyable and informative.
Thank you.
Nonesuch Records (talk) 22:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to the Nonesuch Records Wikipedia page, from the label
Talk:Noel Penny Turbines

message: Some info on the company here Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 11:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A reference source

message: For anyone sufficiently interested to develop either this article, or one on Noel Penny himself, the publication entitled "The 'nearly' engine" is absolutely stuffed with valuable information. I'm afraid I've done all I can do here. Nick Moyes (talk) 10:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noel Penny
Talk:Set/to do

message: From peer review:
;CBM
*As it stands, this article is extremely redundant with naive set theory, almost to the point of duplication.
*This article is an appropriate place to discuss the philosophical questions associated with sets. For example, Penelope Maddy is widely rumored to have claimed that sets exist in some "physical sense".
*There is no mention of extenstionality in the article, but this is one of the things that makes sets into sets. Like they say, there are no blue sets.
*The concept of the cumulative hierarchy is missing.
*Can a set be a member of itself? Of course the axiomatic treatment doesn't belong here, but some discussion does.
*The sections on basic operations could be grouped together (union, intersection, relative complement).
*There is no mention of Russell's paradox except as a "see also" link. This is, historically, an important step in the understanding of the technical limits of the natural language term "set".
;Trebor
*There is very little detail on the history of sets, or their application to Mathematics in general except in the lead. A bit more background information (with references) would balance the article and provide a more well-rounded look; at the moment, it's more of a textbook than an encyclopaedia article.
;Opabinia regalis
*FA and GA will whack you over lack of inline citations. Most of this stuff is trivially self-verifying, but when you add more background/history and more advanced material, make sure to add references where appropriate.
*Images are prime candidates for SVG-ifying.
*The union 'cup symbol' and intersection 'cap' symbols just appear as small tall rectangle. Guidance needed to improve it.Lifesize (talk) 12:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Nixon Peabody

message: Update key people:
Stephen Zubiago, CEO and Managing Partner; Andrew Glincher, Senior Chairman and Partner
Steve's role as CEO and MP began on February 1, 2021. Links for reference: Boston Globe: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/02/01/business/new-ceo-takes-over-nixon-peabody/ & Nixon Peabody: https://www.nixonpeabody.com/en/news/press-releases/2021/02/01/law-firm-nixon-peabody-llp-elects-stephen-zubiago-as-ceo-and-managing-partner
47.147.213.166 (talk) 20:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done  15 (talk) 16:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update key people
Talk:Nivada

message: It's bad enough that the article is written like a press release, and that there are no sources cited, but some of the claims are transparently bullshit.  To wit: "In 1979 the Nivada brand was purchased by a Chinese gentleman, Hakui Sito. The watches were manufactured in rural South Korea by children helping to support their families.  Clearly someone just pulled this out of a orifice, or they were completely misled by someone else who did so.  First, what is the difference between a "Chinese "man" and a 
Chinese gentleman"?  Second, I think it's safe to say that no "Chinese gentleman" has ever been named "Hakui Sito".  "Hakui" is a place in Japan, so it may be used as a surname there, but "Sito" is not a Japanese given or surname.  And third, the very idea of watches being manufactured in rural South Korea by children is patently absurd! Since no source is listed for these absurd claims, nor is there any result when Googling for other instances of these claims, I'm going to remove them. Bricology (talk) 07:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense claims
Talk:Nissan Motors v. Nissan Computer

message: Who put all these citation needed boxes in this article but didn't bother to look them up? half of them are on the nissan cars wiki page. Lazy Willpower101 (talk) 02:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This statement 
: "However, Nissan Computer was named after its owner, Uzi Nissan" 
should be changed, the wording of it, the sense of it, and where it appears, it's almost a non sequitor. "Named after its owner" is not an important aspect of trademark in the United States; if your name is McDonald's, you can't just start selling burgers under your name because it's your name. A discussion of that aspect of trademarks is no doubt interesting, but there is no discussion on the page. More important in this case, is that Nissan Computers is in a different business than Nissan Motors, because that is relevant in trademark disputes. 68.175.11.48 (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  but it's named for its owner! 

message: So... what was the ouctome of the case? The article doesn't actually say. Taras (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outcome
Talk:Nissui

message: My mother worked at Fishking Processors in Los Angeles, which was an organized plant.  The company was sold to Nippon Suisan, and the labor conditions got worse.  Vacation and sick day policies got worse.  They brought in temp workers to try to bust the union, but it didn't work.  Management decisions, at least during the transition, harmed productivity - the line would shut down more often, the Japanese style of having each worker learn multiple tasks tended to slow the line down as inexperienced workers bottlenecked the line.  The company had already been declining due to family infighting, but the new owners were no better.  Thankfully, my mother got her meager pension through the Teamsters instead of the company, and my father's job gives her health care for the rest of her life.  I feel so fortunate -- and also feel sadness and shame for the other workers there who, I'm certain, mostly don't have these good benefits.  99.56.83.80 (talk) 07:00, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Union in the US 

message: Can anyone explain the purpose of this entire section, taken from the company's website? Gothicman22 (talk) 18:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing nonsense?
Talk:Nike Vision

message: Could this article possibly be merged with the main Nike Corporation article?  This page really doesn't offer a great deal of information about this subsidiary. Kartano (talk) 17:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with NIKE? 

message: Hi,
This article provides misleading information.
Nike Vision is not a company, and you will not find it anywhere in the official lists of Nike subsidiaries.
It's rather a brand (although it does not seem to be officially registered).
The manufacturing company behind Nike Vision is Marchon Eyewear, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marchon_Eyewear and https://www.nikevision.com/terms-conditions. 37.73.109.100 (talk) 00:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nike Vision is not a company
Talk:Nickey Chevrolet

message: I removed the WP:PROD based on a lot of google books search results.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD