Talk:Belarusian resistance during World War II

message: The article describes Soviet resistance in Belarus during World War II. By analogy there should exist Russian resistance... - absurd. Many, maybe the majority, of Soviet partizans weren't local: 
*Alexei Fyodorov - Ukrainian, one of the leaders of Soviet partisan movement 
*Alexander Saburov - Russian
*Zinaida Portnova - Russian
In Bryansk region - it's in Russia. Belgorod, Kursk, and Smolensk regions - also Russia.
Total anarchy.Xx236 12:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just started man, just give me some time. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: It will. The reason why I ask to affix the date in the article title since there are resistance being performed in Belarus now against President Lukashenko. I want to differentiate between the two. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 06:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Belarusian resistance during World War II

message: Isn't it the same?Xx236 (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I’m agree they are about the same. --Renessaince (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Belarusian partisans]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Belarusian resistance during World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714144611/http://mizna.ru/docs/2/1212/conv_1/file1.pdf to http://mizna.ru/docs/2/1212/conv_1/file1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I do not feel that it is entirely appropriate for people such as Vyacheslav Adamovich and Mikhail Vitushko to be included as "resistance"; they did not do any real resisting, and instead worked as collaborators with Germany. Furthermore, I would state that they should not be considered partisans, as the term most commonly is used in regards to anti-Nazi resistance during the Second World War, and the Black Cats, for example, were an SS unit; one which performed guerrilla activities, but still not exactly an organisation one would consider exactly partisan. It is akin to throwing the Ustashe in with Croatian partisans, in my opinion, and that is why I believe that the German collaborators should be separated from the wartime resistance. Mupper-san (talk) 06:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of collaborators as partisans 

message: @Onel5969 Is there any possibility of undoing the revert if additional sources are provided? As it stands now, this article constantly jumps between Belarusian Soviet and Polish partisans with little in the name of consistency, and additionally covers two groups which fought each other as the same subject. There's ample proof as to their existence (see here in Polish, here in Russian), as their involvement both in anti-German and anti-Soviet military activities. They're additionally of note in regards to relations between Poland and the government of Lukashenko (see here, here, and here), as well as the rights of ethnic Poles within Belarus.
Currently, this article doesn't cover this, and it's confusing to address two separate topics in the same article. As just one example of this difference, the Belarusian Soviet partisans hold a high place in Belarusian culture and are at the focus of the government, while the Belarusian Polish partisans are shunned and subject to what is widely regarded as a defamation campaign by the Belarusian government. I'm willing to do whatever is needed to keep the articles separate, because as it stands now the article is confusing and puts two subjects under a singular umbrella when they're in fact wholly different.
Mupper-san (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a split would be appropriate, but you need sourcing in order to pass WP:VERIFY.  If you can provide sourcing, than by all means go for it, and ping me if you want me to take another look. Onel5969 TT me 22:50, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of split 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion