lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australia/Project banner

message: Just looking at the template quickly, should it be nrl or nbl (there isnt a project just for the nrl). If this could be changed or there could be one added for the nbl that would be great. Cheers, Jasrocks (talk)  11:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a rugby fan, but I added support for the existing NRL WikiProject. Which WikiProject or changes would you like to see supported and I'll make the necessary changes to the template. AFL fan here, sorry :) -- Longhair\talk 11:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep that. Just the NBL WikiProject as I started it and will start categorising them soon. I'm an AFL fan too, but enjoy a sidedish of other sports :P. Jasrocks (talk)  12:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. See Talk:List of Adelaide 36ers players for an example. NBL articles will automatically populate into :Category:WikiProject NBL articles. Let me know if anything is amiss. Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 12:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NRL

message: Hi - can we get a tag please for the brand new Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics of Australia?  thanks --Matilda talk 01:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics of Australia
Talk:Battle of Miyako Bay

message: The article does not even specify where Miyako Bay is. There is no mention of provinces, prefectures, or cities. The only link is to a disambiguation page. The only relevant page appears to be Miyako, Iwate, which I guess is it, but the reader shouldn't have to guess. And that Iwate article doesn't even mention a bay. So if the primary contributor or another editor has a source for this battle, the article would benefit from more specific location.Boneyard90 (talk) 23:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's Miyako?
Talk:Roger Allers

message: Alan perez Jffhd yo lkbttcvn (talk) 02:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello sir  Roger Allers my name is Alan i like to talk with you b because I made a book  and I will like to make a movie and I need your help  Maynorperez333@gmail  if you help to can talk With the email of my dad
Talk:TI Connect

message: Added screen shot and updated software info box. Xaios 07:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Perhaps this article should also mention the TI Connect CE software. Thoughts?
https://education.ti.com/en/products/computer-software/ti-connect-ce-sw
- Blue.painting (talk) 14:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Include info on TI Connect CE?
Talk:Aspergillus niger

message: Needs a section on A. niger indoors. Nemetona 18:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance in Indoor Environments 

message: This section needs improvement, and sources are needed for "egyptian tomb" and "peat" as a source of A. niger. --Nemetona 18:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Disease 

message: — Assignment last updated by ICapt.NemoI (talk) 19:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MIBO 3500 Introduction to Microbiology

message: We can add in IPA on how to pronounce this to avoid... Confusions? Burned Toast (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Convair F-102 Delta Dagger

message: The reason it was called the "tub" was its wallowing subsonic performance due to have the extra frontal area from the side-by-side cockpit - not the side-by-side cockpit itself as this article would seem to be indicating.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.44.141 (talk) 13:47, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither claim is cited, though the visual similarity to a tub seems more than obvious. - BilCat (talk) 23:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TF-102 "Tub" 

message: Text says that the second wing fence was added during the transition to an area ruled YF-102A, but in the photos on the page you can clearly see two wing fences on both the YF-102 and the YF-102A. So it must have been added earlier . 
Also curious why the main photo on the page is of the YF-102 pre-area rule prototype which looks very different from the later production model. Surely a decent photo of a production F-102A could be located. And since it is of a YF-102 I changed the caption, since it is not an F-102 like it claimed before. Thats something like taking a photo of a YF-17, captioning in "F/A-18" and slapping it up as the main image on the F-18 page. 
64.222.125.125 (talk) 06:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wing fences 

message: from http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/f102_1.html
"When the underwing tanks were carried, however, the F-102A was limited to subsonic performance."
Considering that most F-102s were fitted with tanks, this would mean that operationallly they were subsonic Bachcell (talk) 05:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's one reason most such tanks are drop tanks, so they can be jettisoned when needed, such as for dash speed or combat. However, I don't know if Baugher is correct on this. He sometimes isn't. BilCat (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I very much doubt that joebaugher.com meets WP:RS, despite being cited in multiple Wikipedia articles. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsonic with underwing fuel tanks
Talk:Potential vorticity

message: Could you please add a description that is a little simpler to comprehend to an average person.  Keep the original wording, the comprehensiveness is great, but a simple "in other words it is .... " would greatly enhance this definition. Steve
* Alright, I'll see what I can do. --Storm Horizon 23:20, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: FYI: On my PC, the minus signs in eqns (1) and (2) are not displayed reliably in Chrome, Edge and Opera browsers. Firefox does not have this problem.
Dulciana (talk) 15:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Browser glitch
Talk:Caiga Quien Caiga

message: The reason of why I removed the link Portal CQC - Chilean fansite is because I don't really think that putting links to certain fan websites is appropiate in Wikpedia Articles. As you would see in most popular television show articles, there is almost no link relating to Fansites, this is because people see them as a way of promoting. It's better to keep sites officially relating to the article or ones being sponsored.
For example, if we had every single fansite that there is available on the net about the television show Lost, and we post them on it's respective article... it would probably double the page size.
If anyone has another view about it, please leave a comment.
Thanks. --CROWDUDE 08:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing of fansite link

message: I modified the review (which by the way was copied verbatim from []) and I think that now it reads more neutral. I modified also the article here and there, which read a lot like translated from the Spanish WP article. 
Perhaps if someone else can confirm it we can remove the "soapbox" sign in the page?
--Dockingman 03:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, now it is much better, thanks for the hard work. -- ReyBrujo 03:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally, I decided to take the  away... -- dockingmantalk 21:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reads like an advertisement 
Talk:It's Alive! (The New Cars album)

message: see GBook results In ictu oculi (talk) 19:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: ! not there in most print sources
Talk:Expert Infantryman Badge

message: An Army Regulation manual contains the Army Regulation and the regulation is the authority, not the manual...  Deathbunny 22:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

message: No one in the Army uses a blue pen.  Soldiers carry black ink pens.  This claim is urban legend nonsense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.185.105 (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "True blue" and blue ink pens? 

message: The EIB is a us army award, And primarily for us army infantrymen  there was no need or context to having the only photo being a Korean soldier get the award. That makes no sense. I added a foreign military section to include the rok soldier and will continue adding different militaries who have participated. 
I do not want this to turn into a fight over editing again. It has been a problem that non-military or non infantry editors continue to put misinformation in the infantry sections . Cowsthatfloat (talk) 03:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROK soldier image
Talk:Robert Mosbacher

message: Some of the facts about the Rove scandal are about his son, Robert Mosbacher Jr. I'll clarify and make something about him, I guess. 
--Evan7257 08:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Karl Rove]] 

message: As it was unsourced and inappropriate, I have removed it. RayAYang (talk) 17:35, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section
Talk:West Virginia House of Delegates

message: *I updated the list of Members according to their official titles (Majority, Minority). --Mphamilton 08:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of members and leadership

message: I recently viewed a political map of West Virginia (viewable here: http://www.wvsos.org/images/elections/housedist2002.jpg) and from it I got the impression that each House of Delegates district is itself comprised of a single West Virginia county.  Is this correct? KevinOKeeffe (talk) 08:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there are lots of place where districts overlap county lines. That is just a bad photocop of a map.  youngamerican (wtf?) 12:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nature of Delegate Districts

message: The reverter removed the updated information.
: None of the updated information was cited and it was not written consistent with WP:OR and WP:NPOV.  Additionally, the districts described in the article will be in place through the end of 2012, so the data is not actually out-of-date. Bitmapped (talk) 13:54, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is out-of-date
Talk:Bangladesh Nazrul Sena

message: Congratulations to the writers & editors of this page for making it to the front page! The article itself is excellent, very informative.  Thanks!  Eendrani 09:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alcobaça Monastery

message: An article about Cistercians has a great image of the monastery that is missing from this one. Even though it's infeasible to include too many pictures, but would it be too many in this case?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adûnâi (talk • contribs) 14:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't this image of the monastery not in the article? 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Alcobaça October_2021-1.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for July 1, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-07-01. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 11:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Typo in caption. "wer" should be "were". Billyshiverstick (talk) 01:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Koyoji Kotouki

message: Based on http://www.generals.dk/general/Katsuki/Kiyoshi/Japan.html along with one red-link at Operation Chahar I think this article is misnamed. Neier 09:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: wrong name

message: Who is Koyoji Kotouki? Koyoji Kotouki is not even Japanese name. In addition, another Kiyoshi Katsuki is already existing. --Rocky7 16:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real person?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism/Members

message: i want to join!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shook62 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah me too Thenewzealandfriend (talk) 01:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Have any of you experienced a current foundation of women religious using the term "Nunnery" to describe their house? I don't mean historically, but rather in current usage. In my experience the term is archaic at best and pejoritive or at least satirical at worst. I would appreciate some feedback on this.--Kjrjr (talk) 02:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The typical term is "convent". I've certainly never seen the word nunnery used by a Catholic community, but then I've not looked very hard. TallNapoleon (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes, perhaps it is best that it not  be used. It shall lend to ridicule.
--94.37.172.194 (talk) 20:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question for this group.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism/To-do list

message: I notice the proposal that the use of Roman Catholic Church should be avoided and just Catholic Church used. The problem is some churches which are called "Catholic" are out of communion with Rome. Thus, use of Catholic Church is inaccurate and misleading. The problem is the church in question has no accurate name! Roman can be understood as  meaning "in communion with Rome" not "Latin Rite". However, if this justification does not satisfy, there are alternatives. For example, Holy Roman Church (this is used in Habemas Papam, although this has only been used for Latin Rite cardinals so what would be said of an Eastern Rite patriarch is unclear) or Catholic Church in Roman Communion (slightly cumbersome). A name change should definitely be considered but Catholic Church is not appropriate. MH au 07:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Roman Catholic Church" vs "Catholic Church" 

message: I want to make a portal I already read the instuctions but when it says I should  " Create a new page using Portal:Topic as the title of the page " I know how to make a new page but when I put the name of the portal in the 'Type a title:" it says "The requested page title was invalid, empty, an incorrectly linked inter-language or inter-wiki title, or contained unsupported characters".Bewareofdog 02:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What portal topic are you trying to create? (copying to HelpDesk) V-Man737 02:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll copy this to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism/To-do list, they'd probably have some sort of prerogative with it. V-Man737 04:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Portal

message: I know where to get free high-quality images on things Catholic, mostly taken from the City of Rome. Please see HERE, where the owner declared: I, JPSonnen, took all these photos myself and I give permission for them to be used in any way on the internet. 
Is there a way to publicize this better in the WikiProject Catholicism? Thanks. Marax (talk) 08:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I propose to redirect the American Board of Catholic Missions article, with just one dead link, to the article Catholic Home Missions which is more inclusive. Any support or objections? 
   Jzsj (talk) 01:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Before making the redirect, I would recommend taking the American Board of Missions article content & placing it in Catholic Home Missions article with a section title after "History" section. Just my opinion. Regards, — JoeHebda • (talk) 01:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Board of Catholic Missions
Talk:Joey Eppard

message: It is my understanding that Fire Deuce's Deep Down & Dirty EP was just Travis Stever solo. This was explained by Travis in a blog on the Fire Deuce myspace profile. I'm removing it from Joey's discography. Fetchezlavache (talk) 14:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Edward Stanley Gibbons

message: >>>>A poem was found in the Society of Genealogists archives written by Gibbons, titled ‘Acrostic to Maggie’:
:Maggie, dearest, if you but only knew,
:All the true love and affection I bear to you
:Great is my desire again to be home
:Greater is it in the Albert Bar to roam
:In there do I behold the woman I love – yea adore
:Eager am I my Sentiments to express more.
:Could I but fly from this deserted place.
:And never again behold thy dear angelic face,
:Say only that the love I bear you is ardently returned,
:Satisfied will I be then your love from you I’ve earned;
:Ever will my affection be for you so true;
:Yea, and nothing but death shall part us two.<<<<
Have also left a message on the talkpage of the person who added the bulk of the text in the hope they can provide some decent sources.
Sassf (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poem 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism/Strategy/Archive 1

message: QUESTION: Should differences regarding church doctrine and church governance be moved to Criticism of the Catholic Church?  Anti-Catholic bigotry will stay here.
====Votes in favor====
# Richard
# Wesley 16:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Straw vote for the purpose of determining consensus 

message: # Richard
# Wesley 16:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes in favor

message: Not at all. Please talk this out on the Talk page. Dominick (TALK) 18:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This isnt the way to do this
Talk:Yoko Tsuno (character)

message: The reason I stated in the article is from an appendix with quotes from Roger Leloup, added to album #20. I'll look it up when I have the chance and post the reference. -- Bakabaka 09:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Limited intimacy Yoko & Vic

message: For information about Yoko's biography, read L'Écume de l'aube (the book, not the article)--Frédérick Lacasse 17:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: As far as I know, December 25th, 1969 is when Roger Leloup first drew Yoko. Years later, this date has been retconned as being her birthdate. This would, indeed, make her only 1 year old at the the time of Trio de l'étrange, but I guess in-universe chronology is different fron out-universe :). What I am trying to say is that the  tag can be removed. Anyone disagree? -- Bakabaka 21:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would then rewrite it to make clear that she was created then. From Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction): "Wikipedia is an out-of-universe source, and all articles about fiction and elements of fiction should take an out-of-universe perspective." By the way, the date may be correct, but the location: is that where Leloup was when he drew here, or is it given somewhere that she came from there? Because if it is the latter, then you are mixing the two perspectives badly. So it should either become "According to Leloup, Yoko was born on...", or "Yoko Tsuno was first created by Leloup on..." Fram 05:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoko's Age 
Talk:Beretta Cheetah

message: I have changed this page so that it can be the single representative page of all Model 80 variants. Deon Steyn 09:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redesign
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism/Terminology

message: Any member know how Roman Curia got its name?Manabimasu (talk) 05:07, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman Curia 

message: Would changing Roman Catholic to Latin Catholic be acceptable for the name of the dioceses or archdioceses? I know that the Roman rite is the predominant rite, but wouldn’t the diocese also have authority over non-Roman rite Latin liturgical rite?
Thoughts?
Manabimasu (talk) 21:36, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Care to elaborate?Manabimasu (talk) 05:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:COMMONNAME; many dioceses take the name "Roman Catholic Diocese of..." and I would wager zero take the name "Latin Catholic Diocese of..." I would be interested to see logos, websites, letterhead etc. of any such (Arch)Diocese or Parish. Elizium23 (talk) 05:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman Catholic Diocese of ...
Category talk:WikiProject Catholicism

message: :Forgive me if this is the wrong site to note this, but I find myself once more in an editing dispute on here regarding a matter of Catholic practice. It should be simple enough, but no editor with a professed knowledge of it seems to take part in the discussion, so I am turning to here.
:The matter seems like it should be simple enough, namely how the postnominal initials of religious institutes are to be treated in the text. My contention is that they indicate heritage, in a manner similar to Jr or Sr, thus they should be in bold at the initial use of of an individual's name. The few editors who have taken part in the discussion so far, and who openly state that they have no intimate knowledge of religious matters, see them as honorifics, in the same way as OBE or K.M., and therefore should not be in bold. The issue of their use for religious in the past has also been labeled anachronistic.
:The matter seems significant inasmuch as these initials are part of identifying one's heritage as a religious, even if not commonly used, especially by Religious Sisters, until recently. So I would appreciate having more input into this discussion, which can be found at the talk page of the MOS. Daniel the Monk (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Colonel Shikishima

message: I've been trying to work out how Shikishima is written in Japanese, I'm not sure what "しきしま" means but I'm pretty sure it doesn't mean Shikishima (I'm going on google translator here so I could be completely wrong). An official Akira site  lists him under "大佐" meaning Colonel. Any ideas? Ajplmr 09:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonel Shikishima in Japanese
Talk:Erik Rhodes

message: Which Erik Rhodes is more notable depends on your POV.  If you are into Movies from the 1930s, Erik Rhodes (actor) will be much more notable.  If you are into gay porn, Erik Rhodes (porn star) is a major new actor with a contract from the largest studio in the business, and is very notable.
As far as how many links the various articles have, of course the old one will get more, it's been around since October of last year.  Given time, I think the porn star will have more links.
The main page should be a disambiguation.  The porn star is at least as notable as the actor.  If you disagree, perhaps we should get some mediation.  --Todd 07:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I do disagree, but if for now you will leave the redirect to the actor, the move request should bring out the administration input that you desire. Rather than have to change a whole list of links perhaps twice, if you will just give this a week and it will get sorted out. The links at the top of both pages should have anyone find either for now. Once there is consensus, if it would go as you expect, I'll change the links. All I can say is that some time back when I raised questions such as yours, the established name was always given precedence with the link to find others by that name  from a link at the top of the page. Doc 07:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess I'm confused as to why you'd have to edit the links twice.  Any link you change to Erik Rhodes shouldn't need to be changed back regardless of what happens.  Perhaps it would be a good idea to change the links ahead of time, just in case.  Looking throught the disambiguation list, there are plenty of cases where there are only 2 names, and even one where there is only one article written.  I guess we will have to wait and see what the admins say  --Todd 07:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Were I to change the links to Eric Rhodes (actor) if the outcome is to move that article back to Eric Rhodes, then all of the links would be incorrect and have to be changed again. That is why I want to wait for the outcome. Doc 07:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not if you leave the Erik Rhodes (actor) page where it is and redirect to it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by SneakyTodd (talk • contribs) 08:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the move takes place, the Erik Rhodes (actor) page will no longer exist. Then the links would need to be changed a second time. As I say, we should know something within the next week. Doc 08:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled