Talk:Hello, Goodbye

message: didn't the jonas brothers(who I hate by the way)cover this song,
and if so shouldn't it be noted?
Bleurgh. I guess so. 195.194.74.210 (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jonas Brothers

message: Why does Hello/Goodbye redirect to some obscure punk album instead of the Beatle's song?
=== Band name discrepency ===
Just noticed a discrepancy while I was browsing, this page notes that hellogoodbye did not derive their name from this song, while the band's page states otherwise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.44.6 (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Just noticed a discrepancy while I was browsing, this page notes that hellogoodbye did not derive their name from this song, while the band's page states otherwise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.44.6 (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band name discrepency 

message: There seems to be a contradiction between the RECORDING section and the PERSONNEL section. In the recording section it quotes McCartney asking Geoff Emerick (their long standing engineer) to "really whack up the echo", but in the Personnel section it mentions Ken Scott as the engineer. Now both sections could be right, and McCartney may be confusing engineers since Ken Scott did engineer many of the Beatles recordings. However, I would remove Ken Scott from the Personnel section since there is doubt. I've found "The Beatles Bible" to be very accurate, but in this case I'd still remove him. It's also possible that they both engineered the record by being present on different days.
Thoughts? TomasMFC (talk) 00:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: In the text it is said, that "Across The Universe" was B-Side to the "Lady Madonna" Single, but i think that's not true as you can see in that article. Anyway, I can not find any following UK/US single including Across The Universe.
Anyone knows better?
If not, i think this fact should be deleted.
Greets —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.134.178.9 (talk) 15:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Across The Universe B-Side 

message: they made a cover 4 this song  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.140.46.83 (talk) 06:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jonas Brothers 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Hello, Goodbye → Hello Goodbye — correct title per front cover of single and front and back cover of album, see here, here and here —PEJL 16:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support per nom Reginmund 18:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 06:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support per nom Reginmund 18:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 06:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: That's cool- I came across this by random article. -jj137Talk • Contribs 01:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool 

message: I think this reference should be deleted.  I don't know why the BBC didn't use any of the promo films the Beatles made for this song (In fact I thought they did, but I suppose I could have seen whichever one I saw on some other show), but it wasn't anything to do with the miming ban.  It didn't apply to promo films.  Back then no one thought the idea would catch on in any kind of a big way... Deke42 (talk) 00:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musicians' Union miming ban 

message: This quotation has been recently removed for the following reason: A number of web-sites attribute this quotation to Lennon; however, none of these web-sites is considered to be a reliable secondary source (see WP:RS), and given the subject and the large number of books that are considered RS, it seems likely that if Lennon did say it, it should be possible to find a RS.  Note that "The Beatles Diary: The Beatles years By Barry Miles, Keith Badman" comes close but doesn't use quotation marks, so it's not clear whose words they are.  As soon as someone can find a RS we can put the quote back. 87.115.56.122 (talk) 18:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have access to the book you mentioned.  What does it say, because we could probably use that instead.  Deserted Cities 19:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See the discussion here, it has a link to the book.  I had originally used words from the book but now agree with JC that it's too dangerous.87.115.56.122 (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, I agree that could be an issue.  Let's see what others think.  Deserted Cities 19:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And leave the quotation there in the mean-time?  Surely incumbency doesn't override lack of WP:RS?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.56.122 (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It won't hurt to leave it another day or two, but leaving it for an undetermined time doesn't make sense: if various editors here look for an RS for the quote and can't find it, then it should be deleted. I was unable to check the Google Books link that Rob/87.115.56.122 gave me because I have exhausted the free views allowed for that particular book. Based on what Rob said, however, I think we'd have to make it clear that it was Miles' description of Lennon's opinion. — John Cardinal (talk) 00:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. Here is the text from Miles' book: "To John Lennon's disgust, his epic 'I Am The Walrus' was issued on the flipside of this commercial but rather inconsequential McCartney composition – three minutes of contradictions and meaningless juxtapositions, with a tune that was impossible to forget."  The problem is that the phrases either side of "three minutes..." appear to be the author's words, but as for the phrase itself, it's very unclear.  Let's hope someone has better luck with a source elsewhere. Rob. 87.115.56.122 (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Fine by me. Will you do the honours? — Rob 87.115.56.122 (talk) 05:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

text: removed again. 93.145.142.238 (talk) 11:42, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "three minutes of contradictions and meaningless juxtapositions" 

message: Why do we use the cover from Denmark?  Wouldn't it be appropriate to use the US or UK version?  I think this is good.  Deserted Cities (talk) 05:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, Deserted Cities. Steelbeard1 said the exact same thing to me about the German covers. Every singles' and albums' covers (front and back) in the world, not just the UK and US, shows no comma in the title. Also, all the other (international) versions of Wikipedia do not show the comma either. This would confuse a lot of people if a comma were shown, especially those who just purchased the remastered series. Best, --Discographer (talk) 08:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know where you looked, but in the liner notes to 1, 3 of the 4 covers they show feature the comma (the other is in Japanese and unreadable to me).  The track listing on the back also has the comma.  Deserted Cities (talk) 14:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

text: A few things you might want to consider: the Capitol single uses a pic from the Penny Lane photo-shoot; the UK sleeve was pictureless until many years later; the UK & Danish sleeves use the same pics (which are contemporary with the single's original release) but not the same overall design.  Maybe an argument for both a main an alternative sleeve.  BTW, your link is to the reverse of the Capitol sleeve. —Wrapped in Grey (talk) 13:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually some of the ones in the liner notes to 1 are pretty cool. I'll look for those.  Anyway, I suppose this is the front of the capitol sleeve. Deserted Cities (talk) 14:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Found Norwegian and German.  If the article gets moved, it may be more appropriate to use those because of the comma. Deserted Cities (talk) 14:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's the front of the Capitol sleeve, and yes, good idea re Norway/Germany sleeve. —Wrapped in Grey (talk) 17:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I suppose we should start re-inserting the comma again. My apologies to you, Wrapped in Grey, as you stand correct. Best, --Discographer (talk) 19:08, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For consistency, we should wait until its moved.  It should also be noted that the title sometimes does(n't) include the comma within the article.  Deserted Cities (talk) 20:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, let's wait 'til it's moved. —Wrapped in Grey (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover 

message: Does anyone else think that the German cover of the single look very Monty Python-ish? I know they couldn't have designed it because the Python's came two years later, but it does look like it. --TheWalrusWasPaul (talk) 16:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  German cover 

message: This NY Daily News article describes "Hello Goodbye" as psychedelic, so I'm combining it with the current tag of "pop rock" to call it psychedelic pop.
http://m.nydailynews.com/1.160983  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kbrito162 (talk • contribs) 05:16, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hello, Goodbye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://cashboxmagazine.com/archives/60s_files/19671230.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.musicline.de/de/chartverfolgung_summary/artist/The%20Beatles/2278/?type=single
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140905202820/http://www.austriancharts.at/1968_single.asp to http://www.austriancharts.at/1968_single.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hello, Goodbye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151018093318/http://www.infodisc.fr/SongMp_60.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/SongMp_60.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This seems like a much longer article than it needs to be. How many times is it necessary to mention that it's about duality, and that Lennon didn't like it? Some other repetition too. --Daveler16 (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: The music video on youtube is a remastered version in much higher quality than the image used in the Promotional film section, while this song didnt have a MV originally I can only assume it exists from reclaimed & remastered footage, nonetheless It is the same scene and general setup and includes the shot in the image, should the image be updated to the higher quality version of the exact same image despite being a later created music video rather than the original promotional film? Narazia (talk) 06:13, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional Film/Remaster?