lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Teneguía

message: It is NOT a volcano in its own right but a cinder cone which is part of the Cumbre Vieja's many cinder cones. It is classed as a "vent" and like most "cinder cones" is a mono-genetic. It goes through a period of eruptive activity followed by dormancy and finally it closes down completely. The clue is in its the description "Mono-genetic vent"The Geologist (talk) 15:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

message: It has also been predicted that the volcano will show some more activity and is a possibility of a land slide causing some of the island to fall off. This will cause a tsunami. It's most likely going to destroy a lot of south England and the east coast of America. The governments of both countries are quite aware. New York have already carried out evacuation plans. .
The comment above is at best speculative and also contains errors both of fact and grammar. It is also badly written. The statement refers to the Cumbre Vieja without naming it, is scientifically incorrect and increasing scientific consensus is that the predicted landslide may not happen for at least 10000 years - see the entry for the Cumbre Vieja which contains many peer reviewed references. I have been in contact with various departments in New York and the other states affected by Hurricane Sandy, and none of them are aware of any plans for a tsunami evacuation being carried out. What they are aware of as mentioned above is that when Hurricane Sandy or "Superstorm Sandy" affected New York etc; they had to evacuate many of the low lying areas and advise residents who could not or would not leave to go high levels in buildings. I have deleted the comment in its entirety.The Geologist (talk) 16:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation, erroneous 

message: The book by Scarth et al; is NOT a reference as such - it is a book relating to volcanoes and is not a praticular reference to the Cumbre Vieja or Teneguia volcanoes. Therefore is is classed as "Further Reading." If you wish to use items from any book as a reference that is fine but do so in the correct manner:- Authors surname, initials (date). Title of item in book name, eds. 
publishers, page numbers.The Geologist (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Reading 

message: The geographic data from the GVP are too inaccurate. The more precise data on the highest point of the crater rim can be found at  and the referenced current topographic map from "Instituto geografico nacional (IGN)". I would change it later. Sextant (talk) 16:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  High and Position
Talk:Withington Girls' School

message: This is a stub.  It contains some basic facts and a lot of information of relevance to pupils only (eg times of lessons etc).  Much of this is non-notable and hence has been deleted as such information is inapppriate for an article in an encyclopedia.  Formatting was also poor and has been tidied up.  The article generally lacks citation of appropriate sources for information.
The article about Manchester Grammar School is a good model to emulate in terms of the nature and level of content. 
Future contributors should aim to:
* History: summarise a timeline of the development of the school
* provide verifiable information about the standard of the school and the exam results eg the latest Inspection Report
* identify verifiable facts about school numbers (eg pupils;teachers etc)
* identify and source any notable achievements and notable ex pupils 
Cosmopolitancats 02:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review of article March 2007

message: C.A. Lejeune was one of the founders, she did not go to the school. If she is meant to be in the alumni section, then all of the founders should be added as I think all of them have Wikipedia articles and are quite well known. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.21.33.99 (talk) 07:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni

message: The school website (www.withington.manchester.sch.uk)confirms the names of the Houses and where they originated from I think. I can confirm this myself as well as I am a pupil of the school and this is what we have always been told. (82.21.33.99 07:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Founders

message: Many websites such as the BBC and the newspaper league tables put Withington in the top ten regularly. (82.21.33.99 07:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Exam Results
Talk:Neunforn

message: Hi, I uploaded an image of the village Niederneunforn and added it to the article. I know it's not the best image to show Neunforn but thought it would be appropriate. If there are any problems let me know Loweredtone (talk) 13:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image added 
Talk:Oberentfelden

message: I suggest we should use the photo of the DE (german) edition. The current one looks a bit bad (building crane in the background of the church, bad weather, etc.). --80.219.22.22 (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Oberkulm

message: Johann Heinrich Huber born in Oberkulm in the County of Lenzburg, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland was related to President Hoover. 78.145.77.98 (talk) 09:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lineage of 31st President of the United States
Talk:Bill Cassidy

message: You seem to be a smart man. Dont you think La. Deserves one. I dont think you believe MTG or Gates or that girl from Kentucky. And Edwards omg he doesnt miss a camera.we need just 5 Rep. to vote with us instead of taking S/S childrens meals and meals on wheeis. But the rich you’ll keep giving to them and lg coporations.
Come on Bill you are smarter than Trump or Desantas.Stand up
For us in La. Dont just stand up for dollars.
im not on the free gov money list . Thanks 2600:1700:20D0:1660:9D6D:96B0:1F2D:BBCD (talk) 04:51, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maga
Talk:Ole Scheeren

message: It is a pity that a man like Mr. Scheeren is, so far, depicted in the Wikipedia just by an article without an image. Wikimedia Commons gives no respective hit for "scheeren", at the moment. It would also not be very useful to add images of the China Central Television Headquarters, the construction of which Mr. Scheeren has led, because that building is already an image of on the page dealing with it, specifically. It seems to be so difficult to get free images of Mr. Scheeren that we have, now, the mad situation of a real star of contemporary architecture, born in 1971 (!), who Wikipedia has not yet an image of in 2011 (!), whilst there are people like Gian Lorenzo Bernini from the 16th century who we possess detailed colored images of in a quality perhaps better than one would be able to get it in some museums.
Mr. Scheeren himself does, maybe, not have the time, or does, maybe, not want to edit our encyclopedia. It would the more be a pity if the article should, for such, or similar, reasons, remain without an image as Mr. Scheeren could also, at any time, add motion pictures or literary works to what he has already made us a present of, in architecture. --Hans Dunkelberg (talk) 12:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article should be added an image to 
Talk:Las Vegas Boulevard

message: I merged the article after trying to "clean up" the Las Vegas Boulevard article itself, as someone had tagged it for several weeks now to be improved, and deduced rather quickly the information I tried to include was already in this article, or in the Las Vegas Strip article. Since this article lacked a lot of the info found in the LVBlnd article I merged the info and did a redirect. If I stepped on anybody's toes, I apologize, but I hate seeing these big blue tags atop articles for months upon end, asking whether "This article has been recommended for Merging with this article". I just merged them and I think it works well and makes common sense. --Mikerussell 18:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Las Vegas Boulevard Merged 

message: I think this is on of those roads that has importance beyond what its local designation might normally give it.  So I have changed this to high. Vegaswikian 23:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The WP:USRD/A standard is Mid. I have thus reverted back. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was Move.  —Wknight94 (talk) 12:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of high
Talk:Rainbow Boulevard (Las Vegas)

message: Was the section north of the junction with US 95 formerly Lorenzi St.? I happened to see the NV Energy substation on Rainbow between Alexander and Craig is called Lorenzi Substation. Most of the NV Energy substations are named for the streets they are on or near. There is an existing segment of Lorenzi St. south of US 95 just east of Rainbow, and this segment lines up perfectly with the segment of Rainbow north of US 95. There are no segments named Lorenzi St. north of US 95. https://www.google.com/maps/@36.2365252,-115.2423546,3a,67.2y,99.7h,89.61t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sIbYVztakdCpbfPZ92sZDyw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
:Yes, Rainbow Blvd north of US 95 was formerly named Lorenzi Blvd. The name was changed approximately 25-30 years ago. -- LJ ↗ 03:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lorenzi St.
Talk:Nevada State Route 158

message: Is the junction list necessary if all there is is the two termini? Pzoxicuvybtnrm  21:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. --Rschen7754 22:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major intersections 
Talk:Nevada State Route 207

message: Does anyone know what the highest elevation is that this highway reaches? 
If so, can you add it to this article.
(I searched with Google, but could not find the answer.)
Nevada State Route 431 has its peak elevation listed. This kind of information can really come in handy in the winter time.
Thanks!)
I also found and added this useful External link:
http://www.nevadadot.com/traveler/roads/terrain/  
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.198.10 (talk) 08:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevation at highest peak?
Talk:Nevada State Route 169

message: The following was removed from the article, but retained for possible sourcing purposes:
:The Valley of Fire Road and White Domes Road, within Valley of Fire State Park, connect to this route and are designated as Nevada Scenic Byways. The former, maintained by Clark County west of the park,Ken White, Las Vegas Review-Journal, Undiscovered Country: Las Vegans slowly finding their way to Valley of Fire, February 13, 1998: "Though paved, Route 169 is a winding, bumpy, two-lane, county-maintained road." was formerly signed as part of SR 169,Valley of Fire West, Nevada, 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle, USGS, 1984 and was earlier State Route 40.Overton Beach, Nevada, 15 Minute Topographic Quadrangle, USGS, 1953
-- LJ ↗ 01:51, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Preserved text
Talk:Nevada State Route 208

message: From the article: "The highway angles away from the Sierra into extreme northern Antelope Valley and through the unincorporated town of Topaz Ranch Estates before climbing several hundred feet over Jack Wright Summit (elevation 5842 MSL). It then makes a steep descent through a canyon created by the East Walker River, flattening out into Smith Valley at the town of Wellington."
How can it be along the East Walker River when the highway follows the West Walker River through Wilson Canyon before the 2 branches merge near Yerington? The branches are never close together until their confluence. 69.42.21.9 (talk) 07:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. It is the West Walker River, as a quick check with any map shows. Fortunately that's an easy fix. Dave (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  East or West?
Talk:Olsberg, Aargau

message: Fehler im Anzeige("Bearbeiten")modus
Der deutsche Teils des Artikels enthält nach meiner Durchsicht noch mindestens 2 Druckfehler. Beim Klicken auf "Bearbeiten" wechselt der Anzeigemodus auf den englischen Artikel des Eintrags "Olsberg" statt richtig auf den deutschen.
Ich bitte den zuständigen Admin, den obengenannten Scriptfehler zu beheben.
--2001:1716:4603:61A0:D507:53A5:F0A5:BA4C (talk) 15:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Nevada State Route 160

message: First, shoutout to User:Ljthefro for their hard work on this page. Thank you for following up on my notes re: misidentification of SR 94.
I am working to research and ground the information in this page in some of the rich historical context of Nevada's highway system. My method involves archival research and comparative analysis of maps and publicly available information. It is also important to me to be able to update citations to links which will provide online access to source data such as archival maps and news clippings. I have already identified some specific errors which I've also reported to Google Maps; for example, Tecopa Rd as labeled at the NV-CA border is officially designated Tecopa Springs Rd on current NDOT maps. I also expect "Hidden Hills Ranch Rd" and a couple others to be corrected to "Old Route 16," at which point I will remove the reference in this page.
Edit: I also intend to get some fresh photos of the Route in the near future on a side trip through Tecopa, CA.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegaskukichyo (talk • contribs) 20:45, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New edits with historical context/further notes for future research
Talk:Nevada State Route 233

message: NV 233 really doesn't follow the California Trail in any way.  It does follow the transcontinental railroad, that's true, which is why I left it.  However, the California Trail diverges north of Interstate 80 at Wells, way over by Exit 350, while NV-233 diverges at Exit 378, almost 30 miles further east.  The trail remains well to the northwest of NV-233.  Examine northeastern Nevada on this NDOT highway map, which shows both roads and the California Trail, and see just how far apart they area (and how much closer the railroad is): http://www.nevadadot.com/uploadedFiles/NDOT/Traveler_Info/Maps/NevadaHighwayMap2011-12.pdf  Also note that in Nevada, most of the California Trail is actually closer to US 93 than NV 233. Famartin (talk) 00:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for removal of California Trail references 
Talk:Palagnedra

message: I don't know how to edit in the script editor but visual editor isn't very good at formatting images either. I think it's strange the the pictures are located on the far left of everything. Anyone know how to fix that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFirstVicar4 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Formatting
Talk:Nevada State Route 317

message: I just changed the length of NV 317 and also it's southern terminus.  My source was a Lincoln County map.  If there's anything wrong, feel free to change it.  76.111.67.200 (talk) 18:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 

message: The article says that "portions of the highway were heavily damaged by flooding in January 2005 and repairs were not yet complete as of January 2015." I have since seen a video of someone transiting a portion of the highway with some new pavement in evidence. Is any current (newer than six years ago) information on the state of the highway available? Jim (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update request
Talk:Poschiavo

message: On a visit to Poschiavo musician statues struck me. Who knows something about the history of these figures?
thumb|Poschiavo Musikerstatue 3
thumb|Poschiavo Musikerstatue 4
thumb|Poschiavo Musikerstatue 6
thumb|Poschiavo Musikerstatue 7
thumb|Poschiavo Musikerstatue 2
--Fäberer (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical History of Poschiavo? Who knows something about this?
Talk:Nevada State Route 360

message: This article was ranked at high importance, likely since it's on the National Highway System.  I have placed it at mid importance, since it is not an overly important route.  I also changed the ranking to "C" as well (even though I expanded the article--it surely was no longer a stub).  Feel free to discuss/change it if you disagree.  --LJ (talk) 12:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance/Ranking

message: , I removed the factoid you added about SR 360 being the least traveled route in Nevada—not because of it potentially being trivia, but because of factual accuracy. NDOT's 2019 Annual Traffic Report (most recent available on their website) shows at least three other locations on state highways with lower than 500 AADT in Mineral County alone (same county as SR 360). Heck, even SR 265 relatively nearby only sees 90 AADT just off US 95. So I'm not sure where that article got its data, but it's lacking...  LJ ↗ 20:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "least traveled" factoid
Talk:Praden

message: This article is about a place in Switzerland. Any article about a band of the same name should be separate, on a page with a title such as Praden (band). For a similar case see Valencia (band), which doesn't usurp Valencia. William Avery (talk) 20:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The speedy deletion of the article on the band is not reason to replace an already existing article on a different subject. I've restored the version from Oct 1, which was current until Nov 23, and added in the recent foreign language additions. --skew-t (talk) 09:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Band
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Hermosillo

message: Archdiocese of Sonora contains historical information about the Archdiocese of Hermosillo. It is not a separate diocese - merely renamed - so does not warrant a separate article. MH au 08:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fully agree. article Archidiocese of Sonora should be merge with article Article Archidiocese of Hermosillo having Archidiocese of Sonora redirecting to Archdiocese of Hermosillo.Abögarp 16:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Nevada State Route 376

message: This article has been expanded to the point it can be classified as "C-Class". Further expansion in the route description and history will enable this article to become "B-Class". –CG 15:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassesment
Talk:Nevada State Route 582

message: I proposed to merge Boulder Highway into Nevada State Route 582.  Most of the text in the two articles is similar, yet the Nevada State Route article is more developed.   Also, I don't think Boulder Highway is quite notable enough to warrant its own article, except for the fact that it formerly carried routings of multiple US highways (a fact also covered by the state route article).  Thoughts?  Ljthefro (talk) 21:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging is not unreasonable, however the two names are used to cover different stretches of the road.  I'm not sure what solution is best.  Also the Boulder Highway name is clearly the most common name and not using that name for the article would be a mistake in my opinion.  The road may be notable in that it was the main entry to Henderson for many years.  Vegaswikian (talk) 03:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The Boulder Highway is entirely part of NV 582. Dough4872 05:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Angono

message: So what do we need to add here so we can improve this article? Pathbinder 08:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nevada State Route 607

message: Please rename to "Eastern Avenue (Las Vegas)"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.84.1.3 (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: SR 607 did not follow all of Eastern Ave, and did follow some of Civic Center Drive.  Thus, the article would be misleading if renamed (unless  rewritten). --LJ (talk) 22:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 
Talk:Nevada State Route 605

message: Please rename to "Paradise Road (Las Vegas)"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.84.1.3 (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: SR 605 did not follow all of Paradise Road and the the article would be misleading if renamed (unless extensively rewritten). --LJ (talk) 22:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 
Talk:Nevada State Route 7

message: This article could be completely merged into the history of US 93 in Nevada. Why have a separate article? Dave (talk) 23:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working on merging this article concurrent with an effort to expand the history of U.S. Route 93 in Nevada and Nevada State Route 168. This article will be redirected to US 93 in Nevada when I'm done.  --LJ (talk) 01:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I finally finished merging this content to the target pages and am redirecting the article and talk pages. --LJ (talk) 11:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Nevada State Route 18

message: Google maps shows another State Route 18 near Schellbourne.  Is this a Google error, or is there really two Nevada State Route 18s? Travisl 20:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Route 18? 

message: I merged relevant content into history section of Nevada State Route 789 and redirected this article there. -- LJ ↗ 09:59, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: merged/redirected
Talk:Romanshorn

message: Most of the sections are poorly written and repetitive focusing on only narrow specifics. Quite some facts are unsubstantiated. Needs a rework of a Wikipedian. Theking2 (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rework needed
Talk:U.S. Route 91 in Nevada

message: IMO the national U.S. Route 91 article does a pretty good job of describing the history of US-91 in NV. Do we need 2 articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davemeistermoab (talk • contribs) 
:If this is merged anywhere, I'd think it should be to Interstate 15 in Nevada. There's definitely more local history to cover. --NE2 23:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm ok with that too. Both articles are short stubs, and they would share the same historyDave (talk) 00:07, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Alternately, I'd suggest this be merged with Nevada State Route 604.  This would be a more appropriate article to merge into since what had been US 91 (and earlier, SR 6) directly became SR 604, whereas I-15 was built to the west of US 91/SR 604.  This would also alleviate the concern I had with the proposed moving of the SR 604 article to "Las Vegas Boulevard" (which, should we go this direction, could then be a standalone article). --Ljthefro (talk) 02:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Agreed. That would essentially be consistent with U.S. Route 91 (California), too.Dave (talk) 19:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought (some time later), this is more appropriate to merge into Interstate 15 in Nevada. I doubt there will be objections, so I'm moving ahead with this. --LJ (talk) 03:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: To Merge or not to Merge