Talk:WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2007/Archive 2

message: Why is it changed around so much?  It seems like almost anytime I look at the page, it's one of two different ways: in two columns or in several columns. LEAVE it one way or the other, and if it's changed: I think that should be considered vandalism. It seems a bit pointless to have it change from one format to another so often. RobJ1981 08:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I prefer the three column format like the previous SmackDown! games as it looks tidier that way. --Oakster (Talk) 12:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, let's leave it at that then. If anyone changes, we should consider it vandalism. A format isn't a big deal, so there is absolutely no reason for it to be changed over and over and OVER again. RobJ1981 22:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Or is this more Fan riller killer hopfulness? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cosmic Larva (talk • contribs) .
:Yeah, this is the real roster (minus legends) confirmed by IGN. --Oakster (Talk) 10:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay cool, thanks for clarifying. Cosmic Larva 19:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. --Oakster (Talk) 20:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm pretty sure he'll still be in the game. --Oakster (Talk) 19:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Chris Jericho was still in WCW Mayhem even after jumping ship to the WWF, so I'm not surprised Angle is still in SD! vs. RAW 2007.  Reminds me of the old days though.
Gruntyking117 04:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the Roster Changes for Real? 

message: Hey, I've just checked out the new legends list and I was wondering what shall we do with those confirmed as non-playables on IGN a few weeks back and those confirmed as legends today (i.e. Shane McMahon, Tazz, and Jerry Lawler, in particular the latter two)? --Oakster (Talk) 17:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shane, Tazz+Lawler shouldn't be in non-playables anymore... since legends are obviously playable. RobJ1981 18:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. >_> --Oakster (Talk) 20:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

text: They already are. --Oakster (Talk) 22:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Probably, that's how it was in Just Bring It, with Tazz calling his own matches.  Unfortunately, it's far too late to replace him with JBL on commentary and also remove JBL as a playable character.VelvetKevorkian 23:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legends/Non-playables 

message: Ok, I was thinking about this, what if we were to make a 4-column roster setting?
e.g.
Smackdown!   Raw   Legends    Non-Playables
Batista      HHH   Bam Bam    Vince McMahon
etc...
What are you thinking? --MakeDamnSure 21:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking of avoiding that kind of thing. If any, I'd prefer either an the end of each names or if possible, coloured bulleting. --Oakster (Talk) 22:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you would allow me to show you what I have in mind, all it would be is a 4 column table that would classify the 4 catagories of superstars in themMakeDamnSure 00:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New 4-Column Roster Format 

message: Should there be mention of the fact that Kurt Angle and The Boogeyman are still planned to be in the game, despite their release from WWE?  Romis 04:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, as it's been simply the case for a lot of wrestling games in the last ten years or so. --Oakster (Talk) 08:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's common freakin' sense that they'll still be in it.  It's IMPOSSIBLE to have an up-to-date and current wrestling game at any time.  VelvetKevorkian 23:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

text: No Boogeyman is still in WWE he never was released though but he left for 1 month due to a head injury when he broke one of the clocks on his head one time.
"Pimpin Hoez Like itz Mandatory" 21:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed people

message: I have looked through this article and I was just wondering if there will be a Challenge Mode in this game? It hasn't been mentioned in the article so it may not be confirmed yet but I thought someone might know. arsenalwwerulz 10:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to GameSpot, there are achievements. Whether this has anything to do with Challenge mode or being a replacement of it is speculation at the moment. --Oakster (Talk) 12:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, Thanks for your help. arsenalwwerulz 12:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies. I've just checked a few details about the Xbox 360 (as you can tell I don't have one, yet) and they have an  achievements system involving scores and stuff. This seems to be a completely different thing to what I thought about challenge mode. --Oakster (Talk) 16:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenge Mode? 

message: That isnt the front cover to the game, so since i dont know how to change the picture can someone else do it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Don.-.J (talk • contribs) .
:It is for the NTSC countries. I presume you're talking about the PAL cover with the white background. --Oakster (Talk) 17:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Picture 

message: http://media.ps2.ign.com/media/820/820800/vids_2.html (link good as of 10/18/06)
Triple H and Shawn Michaels doing their combined DX ringwalk.
Blacklist 02:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: GamingRing says that there's alternate attires for Triple H (suit attire already seen in an G4 video), JBL and Kane. However they did mention alternate attires for D-X, which was not seen in IGN's video making this source very shady. --Oakster (Talk) 12:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DX confirmed for SvR07

message: Is there any proof that this roster change is from THQ
of did someone just edited it. If so can you permantly lock the article from being edited? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.131.14.143 (talk • contribs) .
:Just simple vandalism. I apologise for it. --Oakster (Talk) 12:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roster Change by THQ 

message: I can't find any credible sources that says Three Days Grace's Animal I Have Become will be in the game. Does anyone know of one? Mwutz 00:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Animal I Have Become was featured on IGN Insider's No Mercy pay-per-view, more specifically during the matchup screen for the Rey/Chavo match. I would have put a reference for it but there's no real point refering to a paid subscription site. --Oakster (Talk) 22:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: I just saw the trailer for the game, and it showed DX doing their ring enterence, so I have added them as a playable stable.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Killswitch Engage (talk • contribs) .
How Come MNM isnt listed as a stable? They have the video and everything
169.244.254.17 15:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is a good point,I'll  add them if they haven't been added already.
Cosmic Larva 21:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stables

message: This interview does confirm the One Night Stand Arena will be unlockable and that some "Extremists" will be in the game but it does not mention if it means the ones already given out(RVD, Big Show, Holly) or if there are more (such as The Sandman, Sabu, etc). The interview does not mention whether they will be in as non-playables or unlockables but I am assuming the former
.   Zdunne 20:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure it'll probabily refer to RVD, Big Show, Angle, etc. being involved in an ECW storyline on Season Mode (like last year) as numerous gaming sites such as IGN and GamingRing have said there's no ECW unlockables, etc. --Oakster (Talk) 06:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ECW confirmed in game

message: This is true cause she retired before the game is made and i think this will be her last WWE Game apperance she wont apper in smackdown vs raw 2008
:Not necessarily. The WWE can put her in with her permission, and she is on good terms with the WWE. They could also put her in as a legend, or she could come out of retirement.Also, remember to sign your comments with 4 ~'s. Mwutz 00:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trish stratus last apperance on WWE Game

message: I've heard on caws.ws that the Fulfill Your Fantasy match was certainly going to be included in WWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2007 and that it was only a rumor. Capeman34
:The match is not in according to this video. --Oakster (Talk) 20:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is trying to say this is the first game since SYM (which didn't have a diva match) to not have a diva match. --Oakster (Talk) 06:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Nope, probabily vandalism as I can't see it anymore. --Oakster (Talk) 06:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Match Types

message: Should we separate the legends from unlockables, like they do on the official website? Mwutz 01:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legends/Unlockables 

message: Who will be the default holder for the million dollar title and the nWo/WCw World Haevyweight title and will it have nWo in black or red on the tile in the game
On IGN, i saw dusty rhodes with the million dollar championship and at the store i saw a million dollar belt with a figure which was supposed to be TED DIBIASE cuz it said but then it was Ric Flair! 24.253.28.60 04:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Belts 

message: When a finish move occurs in some cases the commetator will say "Stone Cold Stunner, Stone Cold Stunner" Craig Map 09:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentry Errors 

message: for all the americans that actually have the game can you freeplay for the the titles, ie. the world heavyweight championship and also if so who are the current holders.
--Rkoed 01:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Titles and belts" 

message: What's with all the editing? I make a section for Trivia and Mistakes and they keep getting deleted for reasons that are just stupid.
First time it got deleted, the guy who deleted it said that there was "no need for it". There's every need for it! Those are some intresting facts that me and other people have pointed out and just like the previous SmackDown games, this game's Wikipedia page deserves to have a section for trivia and maybe mistakes if there are alot of them.--User:Cool King 01:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm all for a trivia section. The previous one have had horrible grammar. Mwutz 22:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe we could have the mistakes in the Trivia section 'cause those seem intersting enough.Freebird Jackson 00:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing

message: Every time I try to add the Glitches section, a seemingly THQ-biased editor deletes it. Everyone who's played this game knows it is filled with glitches, and it's honestly the most glitch-filled game I've ever played. 
The glitches don't make it bad, but they are very apparent and it seems odd not to have them mentioned in this article. As for providing a source (aside from user reviews) I have no idea why, but most of the mainstream reviews don't mention the glitches, but I assume they reviewed late beta copies and thought the problems would be ironed out by release time. But rest assured, I will keep looking for a solid source to satisfy a certain editor who insists on over-policing this article, and rendering it almost useless. But seriously, I mean, so long as it's tagged that it needs a source, I don't see why you have a problem with this information being posted, --CJ 09:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Glitches

message: Shouldn't it be noted that all legends aside from Eddie Guerrero need to be unlocked? --205.151.6.33 18:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On a related note, shouldn't Tazz, Lawler and Shane also be in the Legends section of the article? Regardless of the fact that they are still active on WWE television and the fact that Shane's classification as a Legend is questionable, they're all classified as Legends in the game. --Jtalledo (talk) 17:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Ugh. No wonder. I don't look at websites that are all Flash. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legends 

message: Due to recent vandalism, I think we should re-protect this article. Mwutz 17:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protect? 

message: aWhy did someone put WWE Raw Live Tour in Manila (Araneta Coliseum)as one of the playable arenas? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.41.14.138 (talk) 15:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arena 

message: Souldn't it be noted that the ECW venue has the same enterance area as 2006, but the building is NOT customized like in 2006 to look like hammerstein? 12.41.14.138 15:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ECW arena 

message: I was just wondering if there was a list of how to create different people. Like Chuck Norris or X-Pak, things like that. I heard about it but i can't find it. I heard that they gave you a moves list and how to make them look in create-a-wrestler. Please help me on this one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.118.239.235 (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The best site is probably Mwutz 20:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creatable Wrestlers 

message: I think this mode should be noted. These challenge are needed to unlock the Hardcore Belt and the Million dollar Championship as playable. --Soopafred 23:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenge mode