Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musical Theatre/Article Assessment

message: I feel that the "Musicals" section will probably be broken up by letter, but this is a good start.  —  MusicMaker 05:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Musicals needing assessment

message: I added the letters to break up the Musicals section, and now everything's.... angular.... and it cut some stuff off (tho the code, apparently, is still there....)  —  MusicMaker 06:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm.... 

message: If this project ever starts assessing articles through the template on the talk page of the article, the ratings given on this page and its subpages should really be looked at again. I've seen articles rated A-class (which should be close to FA, and absolutely no policy problems) with copyright issues with images, consisting largely of lists (see WP:EMBED), unreferenced (should have in-line citations) etcetera. Errabee 14:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Errabee, I noticed the over ratings here a while ago, and bumped them all back to B.  There is no MT article that I'm aware of that rises above B level — they're all in trouble.  Which articles are you still concerned about ratings on?  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Theatre/Article Assessment/Musicals 1 - M, several articles are rated A-class. Errabee 15:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh ... I hadn't seen those lists.  No, those all need to be changed.  Further, there are almost no WikiProjects that don't include assessments right on the talk page, so it would be good if someone (who knows how) updates this archaic Project.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Allright; those were all over-rated (there are no GA MT articles, so there are certainly no A-class), so I bumped them all back to B.  Some of them may not be B-class either, but more time will be needed to re-evaluate.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Errabee 15:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh — most of them aren't even B-class.  Could use some help :-)  Maybe someone can start at the bottom of the list while I work from the top.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll start at the bottom then :) Errabee 16:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: *Accept —  MusicMaker 20:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes

message: We have now passed 1,500 articles in the project.  BTW, I removed the tag from the FA, A and GA class musical films, since we agreed that those are no longer within the scope of the project.  Can anyone use a bot to find the others and remove our tag?  It may drive us back below 1,500, but only temporarily - there are still lots of performers' articles that need our tag.  -- Ssilvers 04:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can probably do it with AWB as soon as I have the time to build the new version.  —  MusicMaker5376 17:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Happy Birthday to Us!

message: Flower Drum Song has been promoted to Featured Article class, the first Broadway musical article promoted!  (There is one other FA-class musical, A Very Merry Unauthorized Children's Scientology Pageant).  Thanks to everyone who assisted us or commented!  -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: First Broadway musical at FA