lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Charles Hendry

message: Then maybe you can ask why this picture of him here is not available to use. It doesnt allow comments, it doesnt allow it to be reframed or improved and it doesnt allow it to be used for commercial purposes. Its not really very useful at all..... and I suspect UK tax payers are paying for it. Can someone tell the UK gov that they need to look and see what the USgov are doing. Victuallers (talk) 17:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Some U.K. government content is now under the free Open Government License (similar to a Creative Commons Attribution license), including an official photo of this minister. —innotata 20:23, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone know him?

message: I removed this passage:
This is misleading because the source, an article by John Sweeney, does not mention a 2005 court case. In fact, Sweeney's article immediately before mentions a 1984 court case where a High Court judge described the Church of Scientology as a being a "cult".
Hendry is quoted in a later piece by Sweeney:
So Hendry has been misrepresented because he is implied to be positive about Scientology, although the second part about his constituents is correct, and a supposedly cited, inaccurate, detail has been included. 
Philip Cross (talk) 16:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientology
Talk:Differentiator

message: I created this page as requested in the Electronics wikiproject. I think that active and passive differentiators should probably be merged here. --Dbackes 20:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think that perhaps it would be good, but looking at the length of the passive page, it just would look too bulky and akward (especially with all the formulas).  I suggest keeping them seperate until perhaps the active one is created, then we could guage the length better and propose the merge once again. Radagast83 05:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Merge 

message: This edit of 19 december 2012 is not in good order: several elements indicate vandalism (related to C). Others are suspicious. Can any patroller clean this up?!Super48paul (talk) 14:51, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted two edits. Well spotted. --Nigelj (talk) 15:16, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Hey I don't have an account, but I think I saw an error on the page. Under capacitive reactance it originally said that it was directly proportional to the input voltage, while all the sources I've checked, including the electrical reactance page, show it being inversely proportional. I changed it, but I thought I'd say something.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.96.182 (talk) 03:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  19 december 2012 edit 

message: Passive differentiator circuit contains all the maths nicely typeset and could usefully be added to this article. We should probably also explain where and why and who would indulge in these kinky perversions, otherwise the reader's reaction will be "So What?" --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest merge
Talk:Kitfo

message: Someone had posted a recipe in the article. I've removed it, because 1. Wikipedia is not a cookbook (especially where raw/undercooked meat is concerned), and 2. I'm not even sure it is correct (it doesn't mention the marinating process, nor the actual use of mitmita).  I've also reworded one statement, from "it is the traditional dish of Ethiopia" to "it is a traditional dish." Many would counter that doro wat is the traditional dish.  I've moved the links to Cuisine of Ethiopia and Cuisine of Eritrea from the "See also" section up into the text itself. Finally, I removed from "See also" the link to ghee, because it isn't especially relevant (though it might be in an article about niter kibbeh). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 03:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Charles Howard (cricketer, born 1904)

message: What does this mean?  Does it simply mean he retired from public life and avoided the limelight?  Or does it mean he went missing and hasn't been seen or heard of since 1931?  If the former, "disappeared" is a somewhat ambiguous term.  If the latter, there should be some material about his disappearance that we should report.  Either way, it's gotta be changed.  --  JackofOz (talk) 08:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disappeared?
Talk:Gored gored

message: Isn't gored gored marinated the same way as kitfo (i.e. with kibbeh and mitmita)? It was when I ate it, though I can't cite a source for this. ;-)  I thought raw, unmarinated beef was called kort (sp?). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 07:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I am not sure about this whole article. But I have never heard of Gored Gored anyway. Can someone enlighten us. Perhaps cite some sources add a picture. አቤል ዳዊት (Janweh) (talk) 06:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Gyrofrog is correct that raw, unmarinated beef is kort. Gored gored seems to be marinated as written on this menu that is linked from this review. My understanding is that Gored Gored is a type of Tibs (sp?) (am:ጥብስ) in which the meat is cut into larger pieces than regular Tibs (gored means to cut in large parts). This would also mean that gored gored is not raw. I think it would be better to have an article for Tibs and include Gored gored in there. Elfalem (talk) 04:34, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charles Innes-Ker, 11th Duke of Roxburghe

message: He's the 11th Duke now...12.144.5.2 (talk) 14:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  REQUEST MOVE
Talk:Money Changes Everything

message: A silence gap of a few milliseconds can be heard at 0:38 in Cyndi Lauper's album version. This error is present in all CD pressings -including the 30th anniversary, and also in the vinyl!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.23.236.123 (talk) 00:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Recording Error in Cyndi Lauper's Version

message: 'Money Changes Everything' is also the title of an instrumental from The Smiths' compilation album The World Won't Listen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.117.128 (talk) 21:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: The Smiths song is not musically related to the Brains / Cyndi Lauper song.  It's another song that happens to have the same title.  Currently the text of the article does not clarify that they are different songs.
Theinfo (talk) 15:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Smiths section is misleading
Talk:Money, Money, Money

message: I've always felt this song is inspired by "If I Were a Rich Man" from Fiddler on the Roof.--190.8.86.105 (talk) 00:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

message: 500 000 uk sales. BPI database. Gold. Coachtripfan (talk) 13:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certification
Talk:Manchester Football League Premier Division

message: I believe that this page should not be a redirect to the Manchester Football League article. The reason is clear. This page would contain more information on the Premier Division. For example, all the past winners of this division will be included in this page instead of the Manchester Football League article, which would be a general view of all the divisions within the Manchester Football League. This follows similarly the style of content with the other leagues within the English football league system. --Siva1979Talk to me 18:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Redirect
Talk:Charles Keating (actor)

message: I don't have time to add a reference tonight, but I can't believe this article mentions Charles Keating being in a Rob Schneider novie, but ignores his rather interesting cameo at the beginning of The Bodyguard.  --Sephiroth9611 (talk) 05:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Added.  Rest in Peace, Mr. Keating.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  One movie vs. another 

message: Someone needs update a photo of Charles Keating Elvisfan86 (talk) 03:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture is missing of Charles Keating. 
Talk:Charles Kimbrough

message: I don't have access to read it, but this newspaper article seems to cover some of Kimbrough's stage career:
Hopefully someone can use it to improve and source the article. Ntsimp (talk) 23:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source
Talk:Moody Blue

message: Is this album related to the name of The Moody Blues?  Does anyone know?Davemcarlson 05:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Moody Blues

message: Removed a sentence that said the 3 live tracks were the last songs Elvis recorded. This of course is incorrect as Elvis recorded a number of live tracks several months later which were released as Elvis in Concert. The concert special was planned before Elvis' death, so those would have been his last recordings, not Little Darlin' et al. It would be correct that the Graceland tracks from October 1976 included in the album (including "He'll Have to Go" which is identified in some references as being the last song Elvis completed from the sessions) were his final known studio recordings. 136.159.160.121 (talk) 20:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction

message: The "Elvis The Illustrated Record" book cited mentions the unfinished There's a Fire Down Below. According to the authors, Jarvis kept trying to get Elvis to record a vocal for it right to the last minute. Given the odd choice of Let Me Be There, it's possible to speculate that its spot in the track listing was originally earmarked for There's a Fire Down Below. I did not add that to the article as I have no source available, but I'm mentioning it here in case someone else does. (Looking at the FTD edition track listing, the lost studio version of "America" is also possible. There wad a studio version of My Way kicking around too. 136.159.160.121 (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: There's a Fire Down Below
Talk:Moon & the Sky

message: Before my edit, the article referred to the 12" release as a promo, but this isn't the case. Although there was a vinyl promo (P12MUTE248), the release with cat. no 12VAA002 was in-fact an 'official' 12" release, though only on sale in specialist shops. I've amended the article and info box to reflect this. I've also moved the track listing to below the CD listing, as I think most would consider the CD to be the primary release and makes more sense to be listed first. Opwerty (talk) 16:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 12" release NOT a promo

message: I've added 'citation needed' notes to places where I think statements need referencing. Namely:
* "Originally intended as the second single": I thought 'Alien' was considered as a second single. But either way, unless documentation can be referenced, I'm not sure this claim can be made (either that, or it's a redundant statement, as it IS the second single, albeit in a non-chart eligible form!)
* "Erasure's U.S. record label at the time, requested the single remixes": Maverick certainly requested re-works and additional songs for the Loveboat album, but unless a source can be referenced, I'm not sure this release can be said to be the outcome of that.
* "...credited to "V & A", a technique occasionally used by record labels to obscure artists' identities.. so that disc jockeys who do not normally play Erasure music would not pass it over based solely on the Erasure name": I've no doubt that this is the case and it seems somewhat obvious, but I think there are 2 things that need citations here: 1] that it's a practice used by the industry in general to obscure identities, and 2] that it was used here with Erasure specifically for that reason. Opwerty (talk) 16:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References required
Talk:Moonage Daydream

message: I think that the "the church of man-love" vs "the church of man, love," should be tackled here.
This was the Ziggy Stardust years, I have no doubt that it is, "the church of man-love." Typical beautiful Bowie; doomed and missunderstood from the very start.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.54.29 (talk) 17:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Moonlight Drive

message: Should it be noted that pro wrestelr John Morrison nammed one of his moves "Moonlight Drive?" I figure it's significant considering John Morrison is intended to be a play on Jim Morrison.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.136.3.10 (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: John Morrison
Talk:Charles L. Veach

message: Need confirmation.  Various sources claim he was born in Hawaii, but the article says Illinois. Viriditas (talk) 12:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth place
Talk:Charles Lawson

message: I was at school with Charlie Lawson and we were all born circa 1960. I'd merely question Charlie's DoB as being 1953! That would have made him 20 years old when we were all about 13, so it does.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballymisert (talk • contribs) 12:33, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Date of Birth? 
Talk:More, More, More

message: This article completely neglects the most interesting aspect of this song - that Andrea True was a porn star.  This gives the lyrics a whole new meaning. Someone please add this. 
H Bruthzoo (talk) 13:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porn connection 

message: What is that sound that occurs during the bridge of this song (the part that Len sampled?) It sounds like a suction cup, or perhaps a Trouble Pop-O-Matic. Does anyone know how they produced the sound? FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 00:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Suction cup?
Talk:Charles Philippe Leblond

message: This article was put together using a summary of discoveries written by CP Leblond himself (which I have marginally contributed to), and obituaries generously supplied to me for the purpose of writing this article by Gordon Laurie from Virginia University and Gary Bennett and John Bergeron of McGill University.
Aeternalis 18:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acknowledgments 
Talk:Morning Dew

message: I removed "The song is most popularly known today as a cover by the Grateful Dead." It's only fairly recent that I heard their version: aaround the same time I heard the version by Einstürzende Neubauten (I wonder if Test Dept has a version :-D  
In Toronto, the only Dead songs we got on radio were Trucking and Casey Jones. Other wise it was Jeff Beck and Rod Stewart from Truth, and Long John Baldry.Civic Cat (talk) 17:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: More to the point, the assertion that the GD version is the "most popularly known" isn't just absurd, but unsourced, point-of-view pushing and peacock language. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 11:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: actually there is some  validity to it..the dead have played live to more people than any act in history..that is a fact not opinion..no I`m not going to waste any time trying to source it but it is true..this was one of their signature tunes and they played it for a lot of people record sales not withstanding..most of the opposition to them is purely political..in terms of shear numbers of people who are familiar with their version of it I doubt anyone else comes close. 24.213.122.169 (talk) 01:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of gushing over the Grateful Dead version

message: Langerado 2008 - MatisYahu "Morning Dew" by Matisyahu and
The Human Beans - Morning Dew.Civic Cat (talk) 17:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: a few more covers

message: In addition to listing all the various versions by various artists and describing all the authorship conflicts, maybe it would calm this article down a bit to say that it's not merely "post-apocalyptic" but explain what the song says. One person is asking to be walked "out in the morning dew" and the answer is that there is no morning dew. Likewise, there is no baby crying, no young man moaning... there are other verses, I'm sure, or they could be invented. But finally, the second voice agrees to walk out in the morning dew, saying, "I guess it doesn't matter, anyway." The implication is that is it suicidal. The reference to "On the Beach" is appropriate but not explained. 173.174.85.204 (talk) 03:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning or interpretation
Talk:Sonoita Creek

message: I couldn't find free versions of either in a fairly careful Google search. Arizona State Parks has nice ones of both, if someone would like to request permission... 
*Map: http://www.pr.state.az.us/Images/TrailMapCMSweb.jpg
*Photo, eg http://www.pr.state.az.us/parks/parkhtml/sonoitacreeksna.html
Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 23:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo & map

message: Sonoita River and Sonoita Creek are the same water course -- all current maps refer to this under the latter name.  May also want to incorporate information about its current notability as a premier US birding locale: stretches of this watershed host birds rare in the US like Rose-throated Becard and Thick-billed Kingbird. -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 18:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, didn't know this article existed before - altho' I wondered about the river name, as it was Sonoita Creek when I lived in Patagonia back in the 70s. Indeed, the bird sanctuary there was a major attraction back then and I guess still is. Vsmith 00:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think the merge should be done. I tend towards Sonoita River with a redirect to Sonoita Creek, myself. I will list this issue on the WikiProject Arizona webpage. Kukini 01:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Must have been done --  Sonoita River redirects here. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 23:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sonoita River and Sonoita Creek

message: I've removed "Mowry, Washington Camp, and Duquesne" from the article as those are in the San Rafael - Santa Cruz watershed which drains into Mexico. On checking it appears that I'm the guilty party who added that tidbit to the old Sonoita River article back in 2006  (Oops :) shoulda known better and checked the topos back then ... sorry 'bout that. Vsmith (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Watershed error ... my goof
Talk:Mosh (song)

message: The video was made with scenes from another music video, however I forget the name.  Time and Time again or something like that.  In example is the scene with Bush getting outfitted for the army, that is used in the video I am talking about.  Should we add this in?--WhereAmI 00:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Video

message: The wiki page completely fails to mention that Eminem placed a few hints on the 9/11 conspiracy theorie (Bush's administration complicity). Is that not worth mentioning? -- 141.30.217.10 08:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 9/11 conspiracy
Talk:Charles M. Vest

message: LOOK AT MIT JEFF BEZOS SPEECH IN 2002 at MIT on YOUTUBE. CLEARLY MIND CONTROLLED BY MIT INFANTILE MIND CONTROLLERS. WHY IS THIS ARTICLE SO SHORT?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.198.151 (talk) 23:09, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIND CONTROL? 
Talk:Charles W. Mills

message: Death reported here: https://dailynous.com/2021/09/20/charles-mills-1951-2021/ should be added to main article.
Bio on UIC website: http://www.uic.edu/depts/phil/bios/mills.htm 143.229.138.131 18:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, new to editing here Wanting to reach out about rules or ideals around noting someone's degree when referencing them. I noticed that there is no use of Dr. or mention of PhD in the article currently, though his education is mentioned. Thoughts on this? Is this an edit I should just go for? Thanks all Lbatesro (talk) 19:53, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding PhD and Dr. thoughout article
Talk:August Spångberg

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:04, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Charles Montgomery (writer)

message: The wiki article on Bishop Montgomery (father of Monty of Alamein) says that Charles is his great-grandson. Can we have the line of descent? Valetude (talk) 00:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry 
Talk:Ceteareth

message: #What is the difference between CETETH-n and CETEARETH-n
#What is meant by cetyl/stearyl ether?  An ether of POE with a mixture of cetyl and stearly alcohol?
--Slashme 18:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, to answer my own question: Ceteth refers to cetyl alcohol ether, and ceteareth refers to an ether of a mixture of long-chain fatty alcohols, mostly cetyl and stearyl. --Slashme 18:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definitions
Talk:M. C. Gainey

message: Should we put that he was in CSI as a dead body?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.80.59 (talk) 02:32, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure. Is he credited for it in the episode? Furthermore, is being a dead body notable for a successful actor like Gainey whose career spans decades and who's had many, many roles that are speaking roles (not "dead body" roles)?Faux-pas Pete (talk) 03:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: CSI
Talk:Charles Muñoz

message: News from an impeccable source of Charlezzzz' demise after a sad decline. Doubtless there will be a mention in the local news, but given his humble notability, national media may not carry the story. Nevertheless, sadly missed amongst the literary community. --Pete (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Charles N. Brown

message: How do you add that Charles has won awards as Best Editor and Best Editor, Short Form?  And that Locus has won Best Fanzine and Best Semiprozine?  
(I don't think it's appropriate to include that a casual invite to dinner, because we happened to be with someone else, resulted in one of the finest meals I've ever had.  But in the interest of full disclosure that's there, as is the more relevant fact that Locus was my first solid introduction to publishing.  The first makes me biased towards Charles, personally, but the second is a concern.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kovar (talk • contribs) 02:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charles Nagy

message: Where does he live now? What does he do for a living? Booharv (talk) 08:08, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Current status
Talk:Charles Newman (judge)

message: A couple times in this article it mentions "IT", but neither is the term explained nor said what it stands for. In fact, I still don't know what it is, so I think it should be clarified or otherwise changed to avoid confusion. 
Furthermore, I made a very minor edit for grammatical corrections. Perhaps someone can revise my edit in case I made errors of my own? Skyturnrouge (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of IT