lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Steve Francis

message: Whoever made this page forgot to mention a few things
In particular, the guy who might win the mayoral seat in San Diego. Nandor1 (talk) 03:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: My recent edits to the article are only intended as a temporary fix to get the infobox playerfile link to work. See Template_talk:Infobox_NBA_Player#Steve_Francis. Zagalejo^^^ 21:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  My recent edits 

message: The comment should describe the primary effects of the disease such as tinnitus or vertigo.  People who have this disease have higher percentages of migraines, which is true, but so does about 87 other conditions and diseases.  Describing what the disease is would just be a more healthy option than the open ended comment which can cause a hypochondriac to assume Meniere's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmyfitz161 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meniere's disease 

message: Whoever is working on this article, could we address the fact that he is suffering from severe drug abuse. Steve Francis 10 years ago looks completely different than 2016 Steve Francis. Thank you. Savvyjack23 (talk) 18:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug addiction 
Talk:Radio Disney Ultimate Jams 1–6

message: Shouldn't the article begin by defining the term? HistoryBA 00:11, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Samvat (calendars)

message: Samvat is a common term using in the context of Indian history. Conversion from a samvat (there are several, and often with different computation methods) to common era can result in an error of one year (perhaps more). Thus a separate page on the term samvat is needed to address different samvats and variation in computation.
There is a significant history (and controversy) behind Vikram and Shaka Samvats, that needs to be added to the samvat page sometime. The Sikhs have adapted a new samvat recently, after considerable disagreement for a long time.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hindu_calendar"
----
Please, Malaiya, wherefore do you get this idea that "Samvat" is a term that refers to various Indian *calendars* in use? You give the reader a totally wrong concept of what Samvat is. Please refer to page viii of the Rashtriya Panchang (at least in my Sanskrit edition it is page viii) -- there are only two samvat-s mentioned there -- vikramasamvat and shakasamvat. The other items mentioned there are potential candidates for other samvats - Jaina, Bauddha etc. You are unduly including stuff here which must appear only in the Hindu calendar article. I spent lots of time fixing the links between the Bikram Sambat etc etc etc articles -- see Talk:Hindu_calendar -- I will have to revert the Samvat article to my edit. User:Jamadagni 2006-01-22 23:11 UTC+0530
---
On a detailed discussion on  various samvats, please see "Rai Bahadur Pandit Gaurishankar Hirachand Ojha,“ The Paleography of India”
Manshuram Manoharlal publishers, 1918, Reprinted in 1993.--Malaiya 05:13, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Life That I Have

message: While copyright still subsits in the text of the poem, it is likely to be fair to quote the entire poem, since it is so short. Rich   Farmbrough 00:14, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: There should be a mention of why the poem was written.  Leo Marks wrote it for his girlfriend who was serving in Canada with the WAAF but she was killed in an accident so never saw the poem.  jmb (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Err, there is mention of it. Read the first couple of paragraphs -- SteveCrook (talk) 12:37, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background to the poem 

message: I am quite sure that this poem is read regularly at weddings. CC is kind of notable, but if we hang onto her, there could be a long list of similar celebrities coming to dominate the article. --Pete (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chelsea Clinton?
Talk:Pennyweight

message: Is "outlawed" a little strong?  Was it really "outlawed," or did it just lose its official status? HistoryBA 00:15, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Isn't the abbreviation "pwt"? -Hoekenheef
:"pwt" is an alternate abbreviation, but far less common. Zyxwv99 (talk) 19:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  abbv. 

message: I recently had some pieces of jewelry appraised, and the jeweler used dwt in his written estimate of the weight of the stones.  I would say that the unit is not at all obsolete. CdanDelivery 21:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete? 

message: The lighter tower pound (5400 [troy] grains) could also be divided into 240 tower pennyweights. pennyweight being 1/20 of the relevant ounce. Rod57 (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tower pennyweight
Talk:Artis the Spoonman

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: Does nobody know his real/legal name?
118.90.14.117 (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not been able to find his birth name. His real, legal name is "Artis". In one cited interview he says his fist name was changed to Artis when he was adopted by his stepfather (presumably his last name was as well), and that he legally had it changed to just "Artis" when he was 40. I also could not find evidence for his birth date, though from other things he says in the interview it had to be between August and December 1948. Don Lammers (talk) 22:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Real Name

message: I have checked and expanded existing citations where possible, and have added some additional citations. I have removed the banner complaining about too many primary sources, which should have probably been removed a couple of years ago after some other citation work that probably resulted from the banner placement. I am going to go way out on a limb now and re-rate this as C-class. I think there is enough verified text and good enough citations to qualify. Feel free to revert if you disagree, as I am not a regular in BLP articles. Don Lammers (talk) 22:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation banner

message: As clearly stated on his web page, he is located in Port Townsend, not Seattle. These are two distinct places not even close to each other. Sack Cheese (talk) 04:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Corpus luteum

message: How big is it? -- Melaen 00:33, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's always variety of course, but from most slides I've seen in humans, they tend to be a little under a centimeter in diameter. --David Iberri (talk) 06:12, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size
Talk:Queen's Award for Forestry

message: Sorry. Some material was copied, but I thought it was fair use, especially as the original source was given as a link. The new page at /temp avoids this problem, and adds new material (the years in which the awards were made).
Pls delete the original page, and replace it with the /temp page
*Temp page has replaced the main article. Please remember to sign your posts. RedWolf 07:07, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Evolution of human intelligence

message: The recent discoveries in China far outweigh teh aged Victorian approach of teh Royal Geographical Society 180.74.219.247 (talk) 04:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Far East Evolution of Human Intelligence 

message: — Assignment last updated by Josefine001 (talk) 22:29, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Human Cognition SP23
Talk:Jay Miner

message: I just created an article called "Amiga Corporation".  It deals with the history of the company that created the Lorraine, later to be called the Amiga, computer.  To put together the article, I got information first from the Jay Miner article then from Commodore International.  There is no information about Amiga, Inc. in the Atari article.  But the information that I did find is somewhat contradictory.  I meshed it as best as I can, but I suggest that the contradictions be decided in the Amiga, Inc. article and then be distributed back to the other two articles. Val42 00:45, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amiga, Inc. 

message: All you guys interested in the amiga history should really watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfTIrJu7NbE
it gives a lot of insight by the team itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.5.185.96 (talk) 02:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A video about the history of the Amiga 

message: Why is it proposed this be merged with the Amiga Corp. article? While this article could be expanded upon, it nonetheless covers a lot of stuff irrelevent to Amiga Corp (and vice-versa). Miner is/was a significant character in the computer industry, I'd be disappointed if the information about him was buried in an article about a company he happened to work for.  208.152.231.254 18:01, 19 July 2006  
:I agree with you.  The merge proposal has been there for a while.  So, since there isn't a discussion here as to why the merge was proposed, I removed it. Val42 04:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging? 

message: There's a very long bit about the Atari-Commodore-Amiga lawsuit tangle, but it has almost nothing to do with Jay Miner. Shouldn't that be moved out of this page and more about Jay Miner's accomplishments be put in? TNaran 07:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it has everything to do with Jay.  He was one of the prime defendants in the suit and personally sued. --Marty Goldberg 07:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text: But the actual text of that barely mentions him.  He doesn't sound central to it at all.  As well, there's barely any information about his other chip design work or the man himself.  I'll see if I can add some stuff this weekend, and I'll add a heading to the lawsuit portion of the website. 142.52.81.18 19:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit relevancy? 

message: What's seen in the image is a European machine -- different from the original one in at least three respects. Furthermore, the image has been 'shopped. --2003:DE:272E:2E36:FD1D:5853:EB89:6A54 (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image does NOT show the "original Amiga"
Talk:A-Train III

message: Added a couple of links
Wasn't there a Macintosh version of this game?  I distinctly remember playing it at a time in the 90's when all I had available was a Mac. --DSYoungEsq 02:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: looks like it was, i found this page on IGN  --Quasipalm 18:25, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the release date (October 1, 1992) and the fact the Mac version was released at that time. See http://www.neoseeker.com/Games/Products/Mac/atrain/ for the information. --DSYoungEsq 17:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

text: We need disambiguation: A-Train is also a Satellite constellation by NASA, as well as a reference to John Coltrane. Oderbolz 17:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Jesuit scientists

message: I hope this works.--T. Anthony 00:53, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I revived this as the Christian list is getting too long and also this is dealing with a slightly different topic. Several of these Jesuits are just known for science and not anything related to their religious vocation. Plus there's the fictional aspect.--T. Anthony 21:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I am in the process of doing a major reorganization of the following three articles: List of Catholic cleric-scientists, List of Catholic scientists, and List of Jesuit scientists. The first two have received new names: List of Catholic churchmen-scientists and List of Lay Catholic scientists, respectively. Previously, there were numerous individuals contained on both of those lists; now, the lists are mutually exclusive (after a major edit of the newly named List of Lay Catholic scientists.
The next major task is merging this List of Jesuit scientists into the List of Catholic churchmen-scientists, since about 90% of the Jesuits are already included in the latter. I just completed carefully moving over the remaining information (new scientists, extending descriptions) so that the List of Catholic churchmen-scientists is complete (the names of fictional Jesuits have not been moved, however). I am about to go through the steps to merge the articles.Akasseb (talk) 13:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is not how Wikipedia works. As in the WP:Five Pillars, Wikipedia works on consensus. Look up policies on mergers and create a section for discussion here in this talk page. After a week so, gauging the reactions, then proceed with the merger. Pjposullivan (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the gradualist approach, I noticed that all of the Jesuit entries on the list stated at the beginning of the sentence that they were in fact Jesuits, so I'm for the merge. Pjposullivan (talk) 08:10, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The List of Jesuit scientists has now been merged into the List of Catholic churchmen-scientists, following open discussions here and at Talk:List of Lay Catholic scientists.As mentioned previously, all of the relevant content has been carefully transferred to the List of Catholic churchmen-scientists. The Jesuits (as well as rest of the scientists on the list) are clearly identified.Akasseb (talk) 12:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Quakers in science

message: I've decided to change the purpose here a bit. Now it's more about Quakers in science with a list at the end. I hope the article portion expands, but if it is not expanded I'll expand it myself.--T. Anthony 12:48, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change 
Talk:People's Liberation Army Air Force

message: The figures in the Equipment > Current inventory section don't make sense. The Q-5 was taken out of PLAAF service a decade ago, but over a hundred are listed as in service. Also, only 19 J-20s? The J-20 page itself says 208+. The Flanker family numbers seem low as well. I think it comes down to the source used isn't very reliable. RangerRangefinder (talk) 03:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The source is egregious but introducing OSINT to Wikipedia is just not a battle worth fighting. Cidician (talk) Cidician (talk) 22:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair I suppose, but the pages should at least share consistent information, no? RangerRangefinder (talk) 04:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with the Current inventory
Talk:Pinkie Brown

message: I replaced the line "Panicked, Brown attacks Arnold at the novel's climax and tries to kill her, only to burn to death when he falls into his apartment's furnace."
I have no idea where this came from, as it bears no resemblance at all to the actual ending of the book, or to the film's slightly different climax.--MockTurtle 01:26, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending 
Talk:Bloggable

message: This has been de-disambiguated into a stub, but I don't think that it really makes sense. First some people expanded the disambig page with information that should have gone on Blog instead (and I will put it there).  Then somebody (in three separate edits) marked the disambiguation page (incorrectly) as a stub, then added an interwiki link to a Japanese stub (but kept the interwiki link to a Korean disambig page), and finally turned this page into a stub (with a disambig block at top).  Since the intermediate stages don't really make sense (and the user was an anon), I'm not sure that this editor really knew what they were doing; so I think that it's safe to trust my own judgement that it works better as a disambig page.  However, if others disagree and revert my revert, then I will not revert back, although a comment here would be nice.  --Toby Bartels 22:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub or disambig page?
Talk:Fluorescence in plants

message: 0th:  Why does the cleanup note begin "This January 2006"?
o "the Day-Glo flower", if indeed it is a type of plant (instead of a '60s graphic), should have some kind of link, so that a reader can find the referent (unlike what his experience with a Google search will be).
o "betaxanthis":  I think it's betaxanthins.
o including an image of Mars is ridiculous (*); how about an image of a fluorescing plant?
(*:  It strongly suggests that someone from UF wrote this article, and didn't care about much other than getting his project into Wikipedia.  The UF work should be subordinated.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMH232 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right on several points. The fact that scientists have modified plants to utilize GFP or other fluorescent proteins isn't a proper subject for an article. Lots of organisms have now been modified with GFP! We address these advances in the organism's respective article or at green fluorescent protein. I redirected the article to the naturally fluorescing chemicals, Betalain. Rkitko (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several Notes 

message: Since writing the above (& then having the entire page Redirected (for not a good reason, IMHO)), I've made some progress in this area, & think that this page should be (*) reinstated (well, without the earlier content, which was largely only self-serving), to include the following:
The wildflower Greater Celadonium's sap and flowers fluoresce a bright yellow in longwave UV.
The sap of milkweed fluoresces white in shortwave UV. 
(*:  I don't know how to do this, and don't plan to be doing stuff like this enough to spend the time to learn.)
(Oh:  This knowledge is from personal inspection.  The reason I wanted it here is because I couldn't find it anywhere else, & think it's interesting.)
PMH232 (talk) 17:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Notes
Talk:Maria Whittaker

message: Is it likely that she appeared as a Hill's Angel in 1983 aged 15?  
--Shylocksboy (talk) 20:38, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Benny Hill
Talk:Communist Party of Australia/arvhive1

message: Just to let everyone know, can you please not revert-war my recent edit, adding in the period the IWW (I think it was the Industrial Union Defence League due to its illegal nature, but it was basically the Australian IWW) was in the CPA.  Thanks. Fifelfoo 06:56, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: IWW in early CPA

message: I read this article and I'm convinced it was ghost-written by Bob Menzies and Bob Santamaria. What a load of cold-war bullshit.
--Peter Jackson 04:35, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Who said the Cold War was over?
Talk:Alina Fernández

message: "One reviewer of her book"??  Why isn't the "reviewer" named?  Comments such as "spoiled, racist, elitist Alina" suggests that this reviewer is not a credible source.
"Several other former associates of Castro agreed with Alina's description." - This is vague, unsourced and adds no qualitive value to the section which deals with the facts of the settling of the lawsuit, so I am removing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.70.171 (talk) 21:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: making a political career out of attacking a political career. --Leladax (talk) 10:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't it ironic 

message: --AaThinker (talk) 10:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  So american cubanos are now in a mental propaganda war with the president of cuba via movies? 

message: Article reads more like a settling of grudges than a bio. I'm going to try and tone it down. Skywriter (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Does not read like a biographical article 
Talk:William Irvine (Canadian politician)

message: Kenneth McNaught's "Prophet in Politics" lists Shaw as a member of the Progressive caucus (p. 212) -- and I think I can remember from another source that JSW and Irvine were the only two "Labour" MPs as such.  CJCurrie 02:45, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 1921 Labour caucus
Talk:Édouard Lalo

message: What can I tell my 8 yr old daughter about this composer, Lalo, and his work to make him compelling and engaging for her? She plays violin and each week we pick a composer to consider and listen to. This week she picked Lalo. Thoughts?
*He wrote one work (Symphonie Espagnole, composed for Pablo de Sarasate) that has become a minor classic of the repertory for violin with orchestra; his cello concerto has been taken up by fewer but a large number of performers; his other works - there were published at least forty-five - are in a number of different genres (a violinist might also want to try performing his violin sonata, his F major violin concerto, or his Concerto Russe.  The violin concerto is almost exactly contemporary with the famous Symphonie).  There is an opera (Roi d'Ys, about 1888), a ballet (Namouna), a Rapsodie Norvegienne, but otherwise much of his output is "absolute music" - however (opinion, this) the quality is high and the emotion rarely neutral. (I remember the string quartet he wrote late in his life, a work I've only heard a few times, as being fairly restrained- still good, just restrained- however. Now the first of his piano trios, a very early work, I'd describe as both good, tuneful and not so restrained!) Not sure if this answers your question though? Schissel-nonLop! 05:40, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MAN B&W K108ME-C

message: ::the category stub is being phased out, I've sorted this to tool-stub, as it seems to be the closest match...if this engine is for automotive use then auto-part-stub would be better fit Xaosflux 03:00, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

message: There seems to have been a project guide for this engine published on MAN's website about a decade ago. Does anyone know if it's still out there? DASL51984 (Speak to me!) 01:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project guide, lost? 

message: I propose that MAN B&W K108ME-C should be merged into MAN SE. The latter could use a section about its products. Cerulean Depths (talk) 19:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not really anything here that needs to be in the main article, which os an overview of the entire company. At this point, this article is probably WP:TOOSOON, and should be deleted. BilCat (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it should be deleted, but I don't know how to do that properly. Cerulean Depths (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge