Talk:Clevedon Pier

message: Its been burnt down
:I think you are thinking of Weston-super-Mare Grand Pier— Rod talk 16:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The article says this was upgraded to I in 2001, however it is listed as grade II* at images of england which I was going to use as a reference. Does anyone have a reference source giving the new grading and citation?— Rod talk 11:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about these two? North Somerset Council or BBC News. --Cheesy Mike 12:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could one or both of these be included in the article as a ref - the IoE one could also be used to describe the construction.— Rod talk 18:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listed building status 

message: This article says "The paddle steamer Waverley first visited the pier to take on passengers in 1886." however the article PS Waverley says "Built in 1946,...". Does anyone have any sources which could resolve this or is there another ship called the Waverley which should be linked to?— Rod talk 15:02, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Waverley is the world's oldest seagoing paddle steamer, so I'm certain it was built before 1946. Maybe it's a typo for 1846. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just done some checking & 1946 seems right - see Waverley entry on National Historic Ships Register.— Rod talk 15:12, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

text: I believe the 1946 Waverley was not the first one thay may have been at least two before it. (the 1899 Waverley was sunk during the evacuation of Dunkirk in 1940 and the 1946 was built as a replacement)MilborneOne (talk) 15:20, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Waverley used in 1886 may have been part of the White Funnel Fleet run by P and A Campbell but I'm having trouble finding reliable sources.— Rod talk 15:38, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Waverly was purchased in 1885 see page 96 of this book. In the same book are multiple references to the old Waverley and also the new Waverley (page 186). Page 123 states that the Waverley was chartered by a Bristol consortium the year before the Campbells moved their operations from the Clyde to the Bristol Channel - the year implied is 1887, so it is confirmed that the ship was operating in the Bristol area and although it doesn't directly confirm that the Waverley landed at Clevedon pier in 1886, the dates are all so close together as to be highly probable. --Simple Bob a.k.a. The Spaminator (Talk) 15:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - can anyone come up with a form of words which explains the Waverley in the lead is a different vessel to the 1886 one? It might also be worth adding something to the PS Waverley explaining that there was one of the same name even before the PS Waverley of 1899. — Rod talk 16:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates conflict - Waverley 

message: *Infobox:  "Total length	310 metres".  Is that from start of first span to the seaward side of the pierhead?
*Article: "The pier is 738 ft (225 m) long....Each of the eight spans is 100 ft (30 m) long." 30 X 8 = 240.  Moriori (talk) 21:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The landward end has a few meters before the 1st span & then the pier head on the seaward side add some more - does this make sense?— Rod talk 21:16, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that bit, but how does a 225 m long pier have eight 30 m spans? Moriori (talk) 21:59, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone back to the Coombes book which is given as the reference which is in feet rather than meters. It says Length of entrance approach = 180ft, Lenght of eight spans = 800ft. Looking at the facts and figures section of the pier web site it says "The pier is 312 metres long, from the gates to the rails at the end." so I will change the article.— Rod talk 22:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats

message: Just wanted to say... a pier is not a form of transport. Silly nominations process. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, but the process wouldn't let me put Clevedon Pier in a more general Engineering and technology section. If you think it fits better somewhere else I'd be happy for it to be moved.— Rod talk 21:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to move it to Computing and engineering but I hope it doesn't confuse the bot.— Rod talk 21:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article nomination 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Clevedon Pier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100807224454/http://www.clevedon.gov.uk/history.html to http://www.clevedon.gov.uk/history.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120923071813/http://www.theheritagetrail.co.uk/piers/clevedon%20pier.htm to http://www.theheritagetrail.co.uk/piers/clevedon%20pier.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927022453/http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/cairo/docs/doc11467.htm to http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/cairo/docs/doc11467.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121223074202/http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/pound-1-3m-lottery-windfall-enhance-finest/story-17635298-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/pound-1-3m-lottery-windfall-enhance-finest/story-17635298-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clevedon Pier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.royalpierhotelclevedon.co.uk/index.cfm?asset_id=1375
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419125432/http://www.piers.org.uk/pierpages/NPSclevedon.html to http://www.piers.org.uk/pierpages/NPSclevedon.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clevedon Pier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091020184203/http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/news/Hollywood-star-Knightley-film-Clevedon/article-924666-detail/article.html to http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/news/Hollywood-star-Knightley-film-Clevedon/article-924666-detail/article.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018235648/http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Direction-fans-flock-Clevedon-Pier/story-20992557-detail/story.html to http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Direction-fans-flock-Clevedon-Pier/story-20992557-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:17, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion