Talk:Die Walküre

message: I have changed the name of the sword, in the place where it is introduced, from Balmung (Nibelungenlied) to Nothung (The Ring). As "Not" means emergency or need in German, the following words ("which evokes the dire need, for a weapon against Hunding") now make more sense, and it agrees with two further references below to Nothung.--John 11:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Name of the Sword 

message: Would it be possible to include a mention of the orchestra used for this music drama (and other works by Wagner)? Does anyone know how large the orchestras were for Wagner's music dramas?
:They are famously large, especially for his later works (from the start of the Ring Cycle). Wagner was a gifted conductor himself and he expanded the range and power of the orchestra within opera. It's probably fair to say that he influenced not just operatic orchestration but the very idea of what a "complete" symphony orchestra should comprise and sound like. The work of Mahler, Bruckner, Richard Strauss, Stravinsky and many modern composers would have sounded very different without the push for larger and weightier orchestras argued and supported by Wagner. 83.254.154.164 (talk) 10:37, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orchestration 

message: Per Wikipedia guidelines of giving an article its most common name in English (WP:UE), is there support to move this article to The Valkyrie? --Elonka 19:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For operas, books, etc. the convention is that the English translation is only used when it is most commonly known in translation.  See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (operas) and also Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera. Fireplace 19:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the pointer (I don't do much opera work on Wikipedia).  I agree though, it makes sense to title the article based on whatever the most common performance title is. --Elonka 20:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming 

message: I included a “real” libretto rather tan a “mere” description of each act and adding an introduction introducing this second opera of the Tetralogy Cycle. One can apprehend the entire opera reading the synopsis and can get an idea of the whole work with the Intro summarizing what happened in the first - Das Reihngol - and a few historical composition facts with History section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reiko-chin (talk • contribs) 10:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libretto 

message: From the first paragraph of the introduction; "...he refused to part with Freia, who provides the gods with the apples of eternal youth." 
I thought it was the goddess Idunn who provided those apples, not Freia. Lily20 (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's mention of Wagner and the Ring at Idunn#Modern_influence. --GuillaumeTell 21:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apples of Eternal Youth 

message: Fafner transformes into a dragon but not with the Tarnhelm. After killing Fafner Siegfried goes in the Neidhöhle, and from that place he take the Ring and the Tarnhelm. That shows that Fafner can not wear the Tarnhelm during the battle against Siegfried. In Wagner`s sources the giant Fafnir transformes himself also without the Tarnhelm. I will change that in the article, but write it at first here because on many other web pages one can read that Fafner use the Tarnhelm but it`s wrong. The only thing Fafner wants is sleep and own the Hort; he wouldn't use anything of it.
(Excuse the false, I'm German and my English isn't that great.)--Operalistener (talk) 11:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fafner doesn't use the Tarnhelm!!! 

message: Infoboxes should be added after discussion on talkpage. No discussion took place here. I don't think the box very appropriate. Have removed it pending further discussion. I am flagging the issue at WP:Opera and WP:Wagner. --Smerus (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox. 

message: Substituted at 13:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: I uploaded a version of Ride of the Valkyries performed by U of Chicago orchestra and distributed under creative commons 3.0, I expected to stay even though there is no performance date, it was obtained from here. Should we have it replace the 1921 version? It is of higher quality. Rybkovich (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections from me. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  To me the older version flows allot nicer than the newer, plus due to copyright there is a theme emerging in the excerpts subsection - all recorded pre 1923, so I am into keeping the older version. I added the modern to the earlier one up on the Ride of the Valkyries article. Rybkovich (talk) 06:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More modern version of Ride of the Valkyries 

message: I've copied this discussion from my talk page, so other interested editors can voice their opinion.
:I don't think the pictures would benefit from any more detailed descriptions. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for forwarding the discussion to here. I think the pictures serve an informational rather than a purely aesthetic purpose. Because it is not just a background to the article's content, its relationship to the content needs to be clear. It can be argued that there is already sufficient info in the set design pic and Hoffman's name is extra info that can be reached through the description in the file. However, the information regarding the source of the picture of Hunding killing Siegmund is necessary. Is it another set design? Was it included in a libretto? No it is from a 19th century magazine, a necessary fact for a description that serves its purpose. My proposal for the description at the bottom of the pic to be: Hunding kill Siegmund, Illustrirten Zeitung, Leipzig 1876. Rybkovich (talk) 07:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to mention the set designer from 1876, it should be written as . I notice there is a colorised version, :File:Josef Hoffman - Die Walküre.jpg. Further, the name of the magazine is  – no "n". But that picture is rather poor and the article wouldn't lose anything if it were omitted. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:31, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good point re Hoffman's work. Rybkovich (talk) 16:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I made some edits per discussion above, Pics are now bigger. There is now some subsection overlap by the pics. This should not be a problem as I plan to add text to the Acts subsections. Eventually the Brunnhilde pleading pic will not be creeping into the Noted Excerpts section. Rybkovich (talk) 07:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image notes/descriptions 

message: I undid the revision of  which deleted a number of contributions made by two editors. I expanded the article while  took time to go over and correct the edits. There was key information missing from the version that you restored: Ash tree, the fact that Siegfried was wounded and exhausted and collapsed as he came in, the intimate connection that emerges in the conversation between the twins, also there was no citation to the quote used in the previous version. The corrections I made all added to the already provided info, no previous additions (aside from the quote without a citation) were deleted. We can discuss my contributions here and how to improve them here. Rybkovich (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No doubt, Schissel’s edits were more thoughtful than mine, but aside from any writing errors my concern is more general. The synopsis, I believe, should be a general overview of the setting, plot, characters and major conflicts of the story. It should be written so that some one who has no prior knowledge of the piece can read it with ease and come away with a sense of what it’s about. A synopsis need not include every detailed plot point, concept and bit of business. In fact it shouldn’t because it then becomes mired in detail that makes it difficult or impossible to understand for a reader who just wants the basics. Cheers, Markhh (talk) 18:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I looked through several synopsis(es? si?) online and in my records, Met's is very brief, the versions I have at home are a lot more detailed, it could be because prior to seeing the opera live you would not need as much info re context - giant tree in the middle of the house, character collapsing on the floor, as you would if you are just listening to it. Maybe with an article we are somewhere in the middle - we don't need as much detail re context like someone who is listening at home, but we do need more info than the synopsis prior to the performance. I will look keep this in mind when adding more info to acts II and III. Rybkovich (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: March 17 edits

message: Hi    and all other editors working on this. I uploaded audio files corresponding to each title in the section. Since we have the same info listed twice I propose something like the audio files listed in Enrico Caruso and try to make it clearer than how it is in Caruso.Rybkovich (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think a gallery of audio files is a good idea, neither here nor at Caruso. There, the list ought to be trimmed to his most famous recordings, possibly one only. The rest is available at Commons:Category:Audio files of classical music by Enrico Caruso – that's the purpose of Wikimedia. Here, the audio files could be spread throughout the synopsis, and the section "Noted excerpts" should be removed as arbitrary. Further, we don't have to show every available audio file – editorial judgement may well omit some. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, I think that siedel's grand fantasy would actually be a good example as it has all the main themes, even though its all horns. :File:Arthur Siedel, Grand Fantasie (pastiche from Die Walküre, 2000).ogg. All of Wotan's long solos could be left out. Rybkovich (talk) 05:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Noted Excerpts Section

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:51, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion 

message: The article is being expanded and improved in stages, as part of an overall project to improve all the Ring-related articles. Apologies to readers while the article remains in a half-cooked state. Things will get better. Brianboulton (talk) 22:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion

message: I may be misremembering, but I thought that the reason Fricka demands that that Siegmund and Sieglinde be punished is for breaking the rules of hospitality, not really "for their adultery and incest". -- 208.81.184.11 (talk) 22:26, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Fricka's reason