Talk:Arsine

message: I did a picture for the info table, but don't understand the code the table was made with.
If someone could post it the picture is: Image:Phosphine_structure.gif
::Hey, can you revise that figure and put it up for stibine, which I have also been working on in addition to the AsH3 thing?  the previous fig had planar molecule.  Key data: H-Sb-H < = 91.7° and Sb-H distances of 1.707A.  (note how the H-E-H angles approach 90 as one decends).  Also while you are there, can you put in the Angstrom symbol in the text, I dont know how to do that.  Thanks,  --Smokefoot 01:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical Structure

message: The data page is nearly empty? Why have one at all?Stone 22:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Datapage

message: ----
In the opening paragraph, it states that at concentration of 0.5 ppm, "it is possible to smell a slight, garlic-like scent". In the Chemical warfare applications section the article claims that arsine is LETHAL "in concentrations far lower than those required to smell its garlic-like scent." but the Toxicology section contradicts this by stating that although symptoms of Arsine poisoning manifest themselves at around 0.5 ppm, the lethal concentrations for both acute and chronic exposure are much higher : "Exposure to arsine concentrations of 250 ppm is rapidly fatal: concentrations of 25–30 ppm are fatal for 30 min exposure, and concentrations of 10 ppm can be fatal at longer exposure times. Symptoms of poisoning appear after exposure to concentrations of 0.5 ppm." Someone please see to this ASAP. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.41.152 (talk) 20:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The apparent contradiction arises, probably, from the duration of the exposure.  One can get a whiff of arsne without dying, but prolonged exposure is more problematic for the smeller.  The second problem is that the Wikipedia safety sections are often filled in by kids who can transcribe alarmist data on toxicity and hazards, but dont look for consistency, as you are.--Smokefoot 21:44, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article seems to contradict itself 

message: The infobox says that the IUPAC name is Arsane, however arsane is a red link. I guess that the IUPAC name really is arsine, but am not certain enough to change it. 87.114.132.237 (talk) 01:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUPAC name "Arsane"  in infobox? 

message: Under the Gutzeit test it says now obsolete. A modification of this technique which is considered as 'based on the Gutzeit test' is used for in-the-field measurement of arsenic in drinking water. The Arsenator produced by Wagtech is a good example (www.wagtech.co.uk/ShowProduct.php?catid=3&productid=9). A report by UNICEF (2006) (on the same web page) says the technique is excellent. Given UNICEF's involvement with the millions of people at risk of high As in drinking water in Bangladesh and West Bengal - this technique should be anything but obselete.
138.250.27.43 (talk) 15:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gutzeit test obsolete?

message: The toxicology section is largely unreferenced. I don't doubt the lethality of Arsine, but when your making claims about the lethal dosage of a substance, it really needs to be backed up with a source. I'm going to go back. There is a lack in-line citation in other sections as well which I'll mark. Again, I don't doubt that the article is factually correct, but for Wiki's sake they need to be backed up. --Pstanton (talk) 00:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Arsine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070329210220/http://www.us.airliquide.com:80/en/business/products/gases/gasdata/index.asp?GasID=4 to http://www.us.airliquide.com/en/business/products/gases/gasdata/index.asp?GasID=4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Arsine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051012215141/http://www-cie.iarc.fr/htdocs/monographs/suppl7/arsenic.html to http://www-cie.iarc.fr/htdocs/monographs/suppl7/arsenic.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Following reference "INFR", "L'action simultanée de l'humidité et de la lumière ou la présence de certains catalyseurs, notamment l'alumine, favorise la décomposition du produit." - In french, "l-alumine" refers to alumina here, while "l-aluminium" (also used in the same article later on) refers to aluminium.
I checked the date where the info was added (6 Sep 2006, Rev ID: 74102347), and the only article I have found citing this is the article (correctly cited) above. However, there are now many sources that include this piece of information as "aluminium", which were all created or published after this piece of information was written on Wikipedia, and bear striking semblance to the Wiki page in terms of phrasing. I believe that they must have taken the erroneous translation on the Wikipedia page as well, so I'm not certain that they can be trusted.
I've changed it from "aluminium" to "alumina" (aluminium oxide), though I can't seem to find any bibliography (including the original) that expands on the point about it being notable. My only guess is its common use in removing arsine? --Tcinfinity (talk) 17:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Properties