Talk:Monarchist League of Canada

message: Mediation has been requested for this article.
I am reviewing the sides currently. If there are any objections to my mediating, please say so.-SV|t 18:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be your position on this article as well as on Monarchy of Canada, though its not yet. If you dont mind, I will continue to monitor discussions here and there to get a grasp of any disputes, and commenting on certain points, if I think they can be useful. Sinreg,-SV|t 19:09, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please also refer to Talk:Commonwealth Realm/5 One Crown or Several].  AndyL has, however, already placed a request for mediation in regards to this dispute in the appropriate place (Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Commonwealth Realm). --gbambino 19:37, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mediation 

message: The MLC as an organization has no affiliation with any political parties -- as the article states the League is non-partisan.  If Paul Benoit is associated with a party, it is as an individual and not as an officer of the League, therefore it should ideally be mentioned in a biographical article about him, but barring that, simply as a brief mention in this article.
I wonder though, will the political leanings of Tom Freda, Pierre Vincent, et all, be included in the CCR article? --gbambino 16:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Benoit 

message: I'm just wondering what the point of the Scandal section is? Since it refers only to personal matters of a member of the MLC, and does not directly involve the MLC, why is it even mentioned? And even if it was to remain on the article, why would it be called a "Scandal"? Unless someone wants to support keeping this section of the article, I will soon remove it. Please reply! PrinceAndrew 00:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only point I can see of the "scandal" section is that it was because of the allegations that Aimers stepped aside from his long time leadership role.  Perhaps some uneccessary detail could be edited out and maybe the section renamed? --gbambino 19:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the last paragraph in the "Organization" section covers the issue sufficiently. Your thoughts? PrinceAndrew 01:38, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scandal Section - Necessary?

message: How can the organization be non-partisan if it promotes the retention of Canada as a realm of the British Crown?  Certainly there are political parties in Canada which oppose this. 76.186.118.246 (talk) 05:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Canada hasn't been an anything of the British Crown since 1982 (arguably earlier).  Canada is a fully independent and sovereign country with Elizabeth II as its head of state.  Therefore, no;  no political parties exist which oppose retaining Canada as a British realm because there's nothing to oppose. 76.10.176.110 (talk) 07:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, a lot of people do oppose monarchy in Canada, especially in Quebec. I don't think political parties such as the Bloc Québécois are really pro-monarchy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zorxd (talk • contribs) 15:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Does it make them monarchist? I don't think so. We know what the Bloc think about monarchy. As for the others, I wouldn't be surprised, if a new constitution was to be written today, that they oppose monarchy (except maybe the conservatives). They just don't think it's worth the effort of changing this. It doesn't mean that they actively support monarchy. Look at this answer from Jack Layton : http://www.filibustercartoons.com/Layton.htm --zorxd (talk) 20:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the point? None of the above dispels the fact that the MLC is not aligned with any particular political party. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 20:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-partisan, but monarchist?

message: Not to scare anybody. But, this article's fate is being mentioned at Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/Citizens for a Canadian Republic. -- GoodDay (talk) 01:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A possible AfD? 

message: Regarding the chronology for the Young Monarchist Group- When was it started? Can this page, http://www.monarchist.ca/en/chronology, which lists a chronology of league events, be cited or incorporated in the section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sampsondecoder (talk • contribs) 03:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  young adult monarchist groups 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Monarchist League of Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121110142055/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=2daf57a9-93fd-4dd5-9643-944b717da6f3&k=8274 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=2daf57a9-93fd-4dd5-9643-944b717da6f3&k=8274
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706205703/http://publisher.hotink.theorem.ca/accounts/35/articles/22994 to http://publisher.hotink.theorem.ca/accounts/35/articles/22994
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604013936/http://monarchists-ottawa.ca/ to http://www.monarchists-ottawa.ca/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)