lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chisel

message: You guys should not forget about the V-shaped chisels (German name: Geißfuß, "she-goat's foot") used in linocut, for example. -andy 78.51.73.91 (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  V-shaped chisels 

message: Japanese Woodworking Chisels reads like an advert, and adds little if anything to the discussion of chisels. Also, Lathe Tools should not be a subheading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.4.28 (talk) 01:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs rewording 

message: I came across a slight problem. This page is redirected to "Meißel". Which is a minor part in the article. The English has one word only for German: "Meißel" and "Beitel". The latter being used for woodwork only. Atm the German wiki does not reflect the English version for "Beitel". And I have even thought about the idea for having a joint article and realized a that for the German language that would not be possible. Both idioms are just used even to differ the specific usage. Any ideas? Oldnag85 (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: de:Meißel is correct for Chisel. Wood chisel would link to :de:Beitel, if we develop an article on those specifically. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds like a very constructive idea. Let us just wait if other ideas show up. If not I believe we should go that way. Oldnag85 (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection to German wiki 

message: In the History section, it'd be really helpful to see when different kinds of chisels become 'common in the archeological record.' Otherwise, the section has little value.Twang (talk) 23:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chisel history
Talk:Counterbore

message: There is definitely a distinction between a counterbore and a countersink.  A counterbore has a flat bottom, perpendicular to the hole for the screw or bolt. A countersink, by contrast, is a conical recess for a flathead screw. --Dvortygirl 23:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinct 

message: Could we have a sizing chart for counterbore sizes for different standard screws, or at least a reference to one here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.143.102.247 (talk) 18:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counterbore sizing chart 

message: Could someone add information regarding the counterboring of rifles?  A prime example being the Mosin Nagant.  Counterboring a rifle appears to be a semi-common practice for certain types of rifles, depending on the circumstances of the condition of the rifles bore.
Generally speaking, counterboring is viewed dimly and will vastly decrease the value of a C&R firearm, but can be extremely useful in keeping the rifle firing accurately.  I would offer up a section for this myself, but I have a very limited understanding of the specifics of how this process works, and how it can affect a weapon.  If there are any rifling experts, machinists, etc. it would be helpful for others looking up firearms information.  Sawta (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counterbore regarding rifles
Talk:Endmill

message: Under "Applications" using pre-dulled endmills when cutting aluminium is mentioned. From my experience aluminium and other soft materials benefit from very sharp cutter, often favoring HSS over solid carbide. Any thoughts?
: Depends on the application and how much you're willing to pay for the tool. Most manufacturers and end users have moved away from using HSS in favour of using carbide, for rigidity and speed of machining. With carbide, most roughing tools have sharp ODs and deep flutes to provide chip evacuation (this helps especially in very soft, sticky aluminum); finishing and super-finishing tools will (again, typically, not all tools are like this) have a polished cylindrical margin to eliminate things like chatter on very thing walls and roping in the corners of parts. So yeah, these tools definitely exist. OSG, Garr, YG, De Boer... they all have tool lines with this sort of geometry.  --207.245.6.123 (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cutter material and sharpness when cutting aluminium

message: To anyone knowledgeable about the history of machine tools: Isn't it true that the name "endmill" originally differentiated endmills from the general superset of through-arbor milling cutters (which the arbor passes through)? I'm talking about back in the 19th century when most and possibly all milling machines were horizontal milling machines with the arbor supported by bearings on both ends. In an environment where that configuration was the norm, cutting with the end of the milling cutter would be a novel notion worthy of a different name. I am not going to enter this into the article at the moment because I'm not knowledgeable enough about machine tool history to be sure. Alas, I wonder if this is something that falls into the epistemological category of "The only people who knew the whole story on that are dead now and didn't write any books about it before dying". Lumbercutter 19:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about the 19th century stuff, but I've done some research and, ball nose cutters are sometimes referred to as "ball nodes end mills". Rocketmagnet 08:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Didn't the name "endmill" originally (19th-c.) differentiate endmills from through-arbor milling cutters?

message: * Support merge into "Milling cutter". — Lumbercutter 03:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge into "Milling cutter" 

message: So what are profile milling, tracer milling, face milling, and plunging? 81.131.10.165 (talk) 11:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I see 

message: "See graph for common values." No graph present
212.159.59.5 (talk) 11:20, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geometry and tools
Talk:Hacksaw

message: Removed the H4X0R addition as there is already a page on H4X0R (which redirects to Leet). Not sure about about the H4X0R -> Hacksaw connection, it seems plausible but a search on google doesn't turn up any connection. Have now added otheruses to the article header Graibeard 21:32, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: H4X0R

message: Tooth enamel, maybe, but for generic bone their are more suitable saws.  Methinks too many people forget the Saw movies are fiction, and bad fiction at that. (140.232.0.70 (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bone? 

message: It's called :ro:bomfaier, although there's presently no article for it. 86.126.3.144 (talk) 03:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Romanian 
Talk:Gauge (instrument)

message: No. This page was created to separate the engineering specific gauges from the disambiguation page for gauges, which has entries such as  - Gauge (porn star), Rail gauge  etc. Given some attention this page will become a suitable starting point for engineering gauges and become more than a stub and or list. The template (at the bottom of the page) is also specific to metalworking, which suits this pages contents. — Graibeard 00:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This page is linked to the German WP page "Lehre". The English page states that a gauge can be used to make measurements, and indeed lists several devices that can be used to measure a workpiece in terms of concrete numbers. A "Lehre" is, according to the German page, a reference device that can be used to judge a workpiece in terms of "correct" or "incorrect", possibly in terms of "correct"/ "too short" / "too long", but without measuring concrete numbers (the German article explicitly states this). This means that either the German article, or the English article, or the link between them is wrong, or the English term "gauge" is ambiguous in the sense that it can refer to either type of device.
Could anybody with more knowledge about the subject clarify this?
80.148.8.66 (talk) 11:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to German page "Lehre" 

message: Is there a difference between Gauge and Gage?  I wonder if the following is true(?):
* Gage≔  To agree on the determination, measure or value.  E.g., a group may gage the validity of a determination.  The same root as engage (one’s promise to marry or the willingness to enter an agreement) and wage (a security or an item that is deposited in lieu of a loan).
* Gauge≔ A measure and/or measuring instrument, a noun as well as verb  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javaknight3 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gauge vs. Gage
Talk:Height gauge

message: "10-4 m accuracy"   ??  --Hooperbloob 04:38, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sentence has been removed as it seemed confusing, it was text moved from the original vernier height gauge page (pre redirect). It's been replaced with a link to calipers for a fuller description.  Vernier height gauge has been restored as a dedicated article. This page can be used to expand on the other usages of the plain height gauge. Graibeard 12:14, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bandsaw

message: I think perhaps a clear section needs writing on the types and various topologies of band saws as the current article has mixed comments on both. Confusing fixed vertical blade saws such as those photographed and typically used for woodworking and sheet applications with horizontal falling saws typically used for metal working and cutting section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.138.139 (talk) 16:25, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horizontal/Vertical 

message: this article needs a section on metal bandsaws. Does anyone have any good pictures?--Duk 17:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metal band saws 

message: Is a 'ribbon saw' the same thing as a 'pine saw'? I ask because Ribbon saw is a redlink at the Robert William Thomson article. --Mais oui! 10:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I gather it is, although I've never heard the term used. I Googled "Ribbon saw" and the images that it threw up look like bandsaws to me. Perhaps it is an Anglicised version of the French term for the bandsaw or something? It seems to appear a lot on French and Italian sites. SilentC 21:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I had it come up as a translation of the German for 'band saw'. I will just redirect Ribbon saw to Band saw, and if we are wrong I am sure someone will create the correct article at some point. --Mais oui! 22:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When used to refer to a band saw, 'ribbon saw' is actually a shortened version of 'continuous ribbon saw' or 'endless ribbon saw'--just as 'band saw' was a shortening of 'continuous band saw' or 'endless band saw'. Ribbon saw originally referred to either a bow saw or the very similar 'frame saw', and some people recycle broken band saw blades by setting a section into a bow saw or 'frame saw'. There is currently no page for 'frame saw' and bow saw needs substantial improvement. I don't think I'm quite the expert to tackle those pages. Destijl78 (talk) 03:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ribbon saw"?
Talk:Draw plate

message: The summary of this page at Die (manufacturing)#Wire_pulling looks like it has more info that should be incorporated into this page.  Also, should this page be merged into Wire drawing?
Vulturejoe (talk) 03:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't oppose a merger of content to Die (manufacturing) and Wire drawing.  In my experience, the tool is called a die more often than a drawing plate anyway... Iepeulas (talk) 04:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Grinding wheel

message: Is "emery wheel" equivalent to "grinding wheel"? -- Kjkolb 08:43, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emery wheel 

message: What is this "...and are used in situations where the wheel may catch on the work surface and fail to prepare and you prepare to fail." supposed to mean? I understand the principles of both the cliche, and the tapered wheel, but why is it stated this way in this section? 75.167.140.82 20:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good question. The whole part you quote can go, as the shape of the grinding wheel has nothing to do with if it will catch on the part or not. - Toastydeath 23:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tapered Wheel 

message: The following items aren't functions of the wheel. What should they be categorized as? Wilhkar (talk) 21:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've renamed it use. Wizard191 (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Functions 

message: I was hoping to reference grinding wheels, but I find that the information in this page is not sufficient.  For example what does WA54 JVI STK2971 mean?  As far as I know WA is White Aluminum Oxide.  There are other types of aluminum oxide also like 32A, the ALOX section should be expanded, and hopefully some more intelligent people can provide more details on what these other numbers and letters mean, and how to decode them.104.128.105.162 (talk) 22:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Reference
Talk:Shaper

message: looks like the metal working project should accept the shaper as a legitmate item and include a link to it.....71.222.101.84 02:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Shepar 2409:408A:A15:F02F:4CF7:45F6:D19E:366A (talk) 07:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of sheper
Talk:Ironworker (machine)

message: I was looking through this catalog and I don't see a brand in there called "ironwork". I believe the term "ironworker" refers to a type of machine. As such, the article should be moved to ironworker (machine). Wizard191 (talk) 19:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the move. I've never worked on the fabrication side very much, although family and friends have. I'm more familiar with machining, but I have general knowledge of fabrication on the level of anyone who hasn't spent years in that job specifically. Therefore, I took the word of whoever wrote this article that it once was a brand name. Of course, I mean "take the word" in the sense that a Wikipedian does—"it sounds plausible and I'm not the person who will research the confirmation at this time." I recall tweaking the ledes of this article and "ironworker" to handle the disambiguation more clearly (the machine versus the tradesperson). But I haven't yet looked into learning more about the machines. Looking at that tooling catalog, I too question whether it was ever actually a brand. I think we should be bold and move it to the eminently logical pagename "ironworker (machine)", because the worst that can happen is that someone will show up one day and prove that a brand used to exist—in which case, we could handle it at that time, via either content tweaks or pagename tweaks. What do you think of that plan? — ¾-10 20:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the sounds of that plan. I'll be moving the page momentarily. Wizard191 (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't think there was a brand called "ironworker" 

message: I want to put WP:NOTHOWTO on this page. What is the correct tag and why isn't it shown on the WP:NOTHOWTO page? Biscuittin (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  — There you go. —Kierkkadon talk/contribs 21:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Although you should make sure to replace the  template with the  template, since  is a specific issue under the more general . —Kierkkadon talk/contribs 21:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Biscuittin (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:NOTHOWTO
Talk:Marking blue

message: Is'nt this the same as engineer's blue. mabey they should be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbtjacob (talk • contribs) 23:01, 29 June 2006
:No, marking blue is made by mixng prussian blue with methanol, while engineer's blue is made with prussian blue and oil. Marking blue dries, while engineer's blue doesn't. They are also used for different purposes. --71.227.190.111 00:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also no, but see the merge discussion at Engineers' blue.-- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engineer's blue
Talk:Drawing (manufacturing)

message: Question: With bullets, the stryations can be matched to find what gun it was fired from, and matched to ther bullets.  Can the same be done to wire to find out if it was made from the same die?  Could this also be extended to include other drawn items, ie can I match my sink to the same batch/production line as my neighbours?
:How does this relate to drawn butter? KenFehling 23:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Knurling

message: This article needs some edits. I can do it when agreed.
It is mentioned in this article, "On the lathe, knurl cutting is usually accomplished using the same automatic-feed mechanisms that are used to cut screw threads;" Do we cut anything in knurling? Do we get some cutting waste out of this process. If not then let me do the edit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Altafqadir (talk • contribs) 15:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding new section 

message: Historically, how long have knurls been around? I have a knob from the early 1900's that has been knurled...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimvn1 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The following section is a popular myth but complete nonsense:
::Rolled knurls are somewhat more complicated to design than cut knurls because the outer diameter of the work piece must be chosen to allow the roller to roll an integral number of patterns around the workpiece. By comparison, for cut knurls, the spacing of the cuts is not preset and can be adjusted to allow an integral number of patterns around the workpiece no matter what the diameter of the workpiece.
The difference in the number of patterns around the workpiece at the spacing of the knurl differs by three between top and bottom of the impressions. As long as the knurl is presented so it makes an adequately deep cut it will self-align and cut an integer number of knurls regardless of diameter. Stub Mandrel (talk) 11:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rolled Knurls
Talk:Naturalism (philosophy)

message: Ciao fellow Wikipedia Editors: Just quick note since the concepts of substance and substratum appear to be so
substantial within naturalism (Sorry I could not resist the pun).  I hope that I have not "muddied the waters" by including
the insights of Colin Murray Turbayne which may serve to "shed some light" on the philosophical underpinnings of naturalism in general. Happy editiing! 160.72.80.178 (talk) 23:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Included objections by [[Colin Murray Turbayne]]  

message: The photograph is lovely, but I am struggling to grasp its relevance. In some sense, surely, just any photograph ever taken is an image generated within the natural world; to select just one seems skewed. Imaginatorium (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angel falls
Talk:Metal spinning

message: Editors:
This article should contain info on metal spinning as a manufacturing process as well as an art.  As both of these processes are different, be sure not to remove content related to one process if you are only famillar with the other.  The introduction has been adjusted to reflect a birds eye view of both applications and information should not be removed to skew content towards one application.  Please add content, but remove content only if it is wrong or not applicable.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a how-to or a forum for original research or opinions.  Thank you.  Iepeulas (talk) 16:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of article

message: Is "metal spinning" an industry accepted term? I've heard it called "spinning" and "spin forming", but not "metal spinning". As such I propose that the title be changed to either "spinning (metalworking)" or "spin forming". --Wizard191 (talk) 23:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Italian Journey

message: Shouldnt this article be moved to Italian Journey?--Carabinieri 15:28, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it and translated it anew. Can nobody at en.wikipedia tell a stupid machine translation apart from an English text? (I'm sure my new version has some flaws, too, but it's at least understandable to some extent). --AndreasPraefcke 17:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The monument in the background is Tomb of Caecilia Metella on Appia Antica. It would be useful to clarify that. The view is from North East - facing south East onto the Appia Antica, which runs - currently - the monument. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caecilia_Metella
And then, the southern parts of the Abruzzi mountain scape.
I may be mistaken - but doesn't the stone show the hooded emperor Augustus? I may be thinking about the Ara Pacis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.132.206 (talk) 23:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tomb of Caecilia Metella
Talk:Accounts payable

message: How to make this article less of a how to and more of a what it shoudl be :-)
NilssonDenver (talk) 22:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'm not an accountant, but I just rewrote the intro to try to make it a little more easy to understand for the peasants and sex it up a little with an example of Dells mastery of the A/P. Sbwoodside 06:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to start

message: Accounts payable is a subledger of the general ledger, is it not? 205.217.105.2 16:01, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Subledger

message: I somehow cannot enter this link - I get an error that it is already used. But when I go this page, it is nearly blank.
Please make the link between EN:Accounts payable and DE:Verbindlichkeiten.
Thanks ----Bernburgerin (talk) 09:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done this now. Klbrain (talk) 15:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to the German article "Verbindlichkeiten"
Talk:Angela (band)

message: This section is to discuss recent capitalization changes.  The band Angela should be capitalized per WP:MOSTM and the English words of songs should be capitalized as English rules allow per WP:MOSJP.  Aspects (talk) 01:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization changes 