Talk:Commission

message: I think this should be moved to Wiktionary.  --NoPetrol 22:43, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: Commissioning redirects here so this is relevant... the process of commissioning content for television and radio networks is an important one, with commissioning editors being notable media figures. The process affects the people who write and produce media content, as well as the commercial fortunes of the networks. Balances have to be made between artistic and commercial considerations, audience demographics (e.g. commissioning shows designed to attract younger or more affluent viewers), and in some circumstances, public service commitments. Should there be an article on this subject that explains details like how a show gets commissioned (who has to persuade whom? Are formats prepared to a brief specified by the network? What sort of test-screening or pilot schemes can be used to test a show's viability?), what the role of a commissioning editor is (I'm guessing they aren't in charge of scheduling a show... in multi-channel companies, can they even decide which channel it should be broadcast on? Is the tendency for different channels to have separate commissioning editors? Are commissioning editors' roles generally field-specific e.g. "Controller of Drama Commissioning", "Commissioning Editor for Factual Entertainment"? Presumably they have to work within the budget allocated to their area by their network, but do they have leeway to negotiate prices when trying to secure content or does that have to be authorized from higher up the company? Who becomes a commissioning editor anyway, and what is it the stepping stone to?), and what are the differences in the process between organizations with their own production facilities and those that rely on external independent producers - I presume the pitching process works differently? How do networks decide on when to re-commission a series? (In the middle of its run or at its end? Is it tied in to the advertising cycle that exists in some countries? In a first season of a show, are only the first few episodes commissioned in case it bombs, with an expectation that the rest of the season will be commissioned if they fare well?) Are there any particularly notable re-commissioning decisions? (I know that the re-commissioning of the original Star Trek for its final season, after an initial cancellation, only came after a major fan campaign - I'm sure such fan campaigns aren't unusual, but how is such a success rare?) As a general rule, how long after an original show is commissioned is that show actually ready to air? These are all questions I don't know the answers to, but I think Wikipedia should address them somewhere. Should there be an article at programming commissioning, commissioning editor or commissioning director that covers this sort of thing? TheGrappler 08:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great idea. Thanks for the notice at WP:TV. Generally our coverage of concepts and job roles relating to television is deficient compared to our coverage of specific shows as most of the work is taken on by fans of particular shows. I think it is important to define the role of the network in commissioning a show but I really wouldn't know where to begin looking for sources. Perhaps a media studies student/graduate or an industry worker will have more idea.--Opark 77 15:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Programming commissioning

message: Commission is also a type of payment. It is generally used by Independent Contractors. Vlasktom (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Commission (remuneration) is the first link on the page. older ≠ wiser 18:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commission as payment 

message: This DAB page is terrible. I gave it a shot, but my effort was reverted. In working on it, I had some ideas about what the problems are. First, I see two sets of uses: one with entries containing only the word "commission" itself (the engine), such as being paid a commission or on commission, and the other where the word "commission" has rail cars attached, as in Nuclear Regulatory Commission or Presidential Commission. For the latter, I don't know what determines which entries belong. My guess is it is fairly subjective. I ended up with a long "Other" section because too many entries essentially belong in their own category, and one- or two-item sections are usually unacceptable. Then there are the asterisk indents, which I loathe because they stop the eye. The descriptions are verbose when they are supposed to be brief. "Project commissioning" and "building commissioning" are essentially forms of quality control. The purpose of the DAB page is to distinguish one item from another. Sometimes you don't even need a description for that. The categories are vague and abstract when they ought to be specific. I find many mulitple-item headers unnecessary. Sometimes I find an unbroken list of items easier to read and scan than a list with many categories and indents, where I am forced to read nearly the whole page and decipher the clues. I suggest concentrating on these goals: simplicity, clarity, plain speaking, specificity, fewer categories rather than more, brief descriptions rather than long, and above all keeping in mind the common reader who might not know as much as you do. Always keep the audience in mind.Vmavanti (talk) 20:22, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible