Talk:James Arbuthnot

message: Is it really appropriate that the chairmanship mentioned in the intro para is that of a mere grouping, 'friends of israel', rather than the constitutionally more weighty and significant Def Cmt? Alci12 13:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: Ahem. (coming here from User:Rockpocket's talk...) If I understand what is happening here, something was in the article about Arbuthnot's voice, it was objected to on the grounds of not being referenced, and the result was that it was indeed referenced, and then some, with a fair bit of additional colour put in about his colourless voice, (if you'll excuse the turn of phrase) and now we're warring over it? Is that a fair assessment? I suspect a number of people have better things to do than babysit every Arbuthnot article so if we could all find some sort of compromise that worked, that would be grand. If his voice is truly notable enough to be remarked on in several places and it somehow helps the reader understand the subject, and passes BLP, why not leave it? But also, why drone on about his drone (if you'll excuse the turn of phrase, again) at length? A short mention would do I would think? ++Lar: t/c 23:21, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Misattributed and unencyclopedic. Also POV rather than factual. - Kittybrewster  ☎ 00:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok. Iridescent and I both decided to protect this, independently and at the same time, as it was drawing the usual suspects into an edit war. Everyone involved in reverting this article today is experienced enough to know better. Please discuss it here instead of reverting each other. Rockpocket 00:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (EC) As this is rapidly heading towards WP:LAME and 3RR blocks all round, I've temporarily protected The Wrong Version. If his voice is important & the quotes are accurate, 24 hours should be long enough for VK or Giano to dig out a source for it; if his voice isn't important, 24 hours will give Kittybrewster (or anyone else - KB, you might want to try speaking to User:Walton One who's quite good on Conservatism articles) long enough to form a coherent argument as to why it doesn't warrant being on here, without getting yourself blocked yet again for edit warring. I do not understand what it is with this family — I'm not aware of any family that causes so many flamewars in so many areas. Can I take the opportunity that any rambling abuse on my talkpage from the Baronet Brigade will be deleted unanswered, unless they have something to say - unlike BHG, I do not find this saga remotely interesting any more. —  iridescent 00:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Thank you. I agree. I am also bothered by User:Vintagekits approach as evidenced by his edit summary 22:01, 1 December 2007 (→Personal Life - better? got loads more where that came from on this "character"). - Kittybrewster  ☎ 16:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I truly think it is not a good idea to edit a page on one's own brother. Charges of COI are inevitable. Giano 16:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think both Kittybrewster & VK would be well advised to steer clear of this; editing the page of your own brother, and editing the page of the brother of someone you've been have a permanent argument with for nine months (!), are both getting uncomfortably close to COI. I'm sure there's someone else floating around who can write this one up if he warrants it. —  iridescent 18:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I second that. The history between the two shows the potential for COI editing is as real for Vk as it is for Kb. Walton One's assessment is also spot on. There is grounds for additional content on others' opinion of Arbuthnot, but we can't just add a sentence about his voice without context. If Vk has a genuine interest in improving this article, then I suggest he spends some time collecting sources that describe Arbuthnot in both positive an negative terms and drafting a balanced section on the talk page. In response to that, I suggest Kb also restricts himself to discussing that section on this page also. Rockpocket 21:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am not going to get involved in the "gibber-gabber" - Kb has a week to get this article into shape - I am getting all the sources and references for my own stuff together this week and after the week is up I am going to tare this article a new whole!--Vintagekits (talk) 22:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It really isn't encyclopedic though, is it? This isn't about suppressing something which casts him in an unfavourable light, it's about removing un-encyclopedic information.  That's what I think anyway. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring over how someone's voice sounds? 

message: Ok, Vintagekits has said he will leave off editing this article as a favor to me. (Thank you, VK, it's appreciated). Kittybrewster, I would hope that you would do the same, due to the COI problems. I for one would have no problem if you edit the talk page, and help us correct any factual errors that come in.  Hopefully we can find a neutral person who's familiar with the information available about Mr. Arbuthnot, so we can have a good article, that's neutrally presented. I know I'm on weird hours compared to the majority of the editors involved, but if anyone has questions, I will try to help to the best of my ability. SirFozzie (talk) 03:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: James Arbuthnot, the Tory chairman of the Defence Select Committee who makes Eeyore look like a ray of sunshine, was gloomy. “As I listened to you, I found myself agreeing with you but not inspired or enthused. Is there anything you can do to inspire the country so that it actually starts believing with some enthusiasm about why we need to be in Afghanistan?”
Gordon Brown tried – Alky Aida got another mention – but now he sounded a bit like a cartoon character going through the motions. He then headed to Pakistan and India. I do hope someone is getting air miles on this and is wearing DVT socks. Kittybrewster  ☎ 23:15, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Times 16 dec 2008

message: I doubt the committee has ever heard such a flow of self-satisfied volubility. The chairman James Arbuthnot is a quiet Tory who can do considerable damage by not saying anything. He left an eight-second silence after a general gave an inconclusive answer on the Hercules that went down without life-saving flame-retardant foam. Two or three times he asked Mr Quentin Davies for shorter answers, then started interrupting and finally gave a tutorial (with examples) in not banging on. Labour's Dai Havard came at it from the other end, barking: "I don't want company, I want an answer!" He wasn't going to get one, not from a minister who can't admit we have three armed forces and only enough money to keep two in the top division. Kittybrewster  ☎ 23:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Independent 16 dec 2008

message: Dare one mention this in the bio MPs' expenses: Senior Tory James Arbuthnot charged taxpayer for pool cleaning? Giano (talk) 22:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Has this been ocvered in more than one paper? If this is just in a partisan source it that not be evidence of true notability. If we do include it, we should avoid getting into the details of how much money was spent on one or another item. Something more like "his receipts were scrutinized as part of a public review of expenses submitted by MPs, and he promised to repay some improper requests" might be sufficient. The fact that he requested the maximum amount may be relevant too.   Will Beback  talk   23:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, it appears all the British press is running the story. I was surprised to see it on the front page of my own Times this morning (Tuesday, May 12 2009) and the Daily Mail  "Millionaire Tory MP was forced to apologise last night for spending £1,471 of taxpayers' money on maintaining a swimming pool on his country estate." Interestingly, the Mail and the Telegraph are both considered Tory newspapers, and of course, the Times is most reputable as is the Guardian, who also run the story, hardly the gutter press - any of them. Giano (talk) 06:49, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does seem to have been widely reported and therefore meriting a mention, IMO.   Will Beback  talk   07:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In lieu of adding any text to the article itself I've added a link to Disclosure of expenses of British Members of Parliament.   Will Beback  talk   22:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Daily Telegraph 11 May 2009 

message: - Kittybrewster  ☎ 13:33, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Post office computers

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on James Arbuthnot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080926074945/http://www.cfoi.co.uk/articles.aspx?cid=1 to http://www.cfoi.co.uk/articles.aspx?cid=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on James Arbuthnot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205023249/http://www.conservatives.com/People/Members_of_Parliament/Arbuthnot_James.aspx to http://www.conservatives.com/People/Members_of_Parliament/Arbuthnot_James.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080706124521/http://www.jamesarbuthnot.com/ to http://www.jamesarbuthnot.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Directors of SC Strategy Ltd from Companies House Register
To anyone to whom British corruption is not axiomatic, it appears pretty rum that the judge in the Assange case is married to a government parliamentarian and close to the security services. (https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/02/assange-judges-husband-runs-security-firm-ex-head-mi6/) -  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.170.207.112 (talk) 12:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Lady” Arbuthnot and  Assange's arbitrary detention 

message: Stood down as MP in 2015, but subsequent appointment to the Lords is missing ElectronicsForDogs (talk) 21:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did he become a Lord?