lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Universal Declaration of Human Rights

message: The Youth for Human Rights International (YHRI) is a Scientology group using the discussion of human rights to subtly promote their church's agenda.  
I would ask what has been done by this group to qualify them as contributors to this topic which has not been achieved by far more prevalent groups with less of an agenda behind them. 
I would propose removing those references in favour of groups like Amnesty International for example.
from who?, .. Cara de pan, lazy dog,el pulpo, etc etc 3tc  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:1016:8:57CC:F16C:B56:5F3F:7A23 (talk) 18:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   References to Youth for Human Rights International (YHRI) 

message: hello please and thank you for stopping by I was just checking on the status of the order for the new one  2001:56A:FCA4:FD00:F421:D9AE:E95F:E2DB (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What’s the latest on this topic!  

message: According to numerous sources French philosopher Jacques Maritains contribution to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was crucial see e.g.:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Maritain
https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1084&context=vlr
Therefore I think he should be mentioned in this article. What do you think? Phelsume (talk) 16:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacques Maritain 

message: — Assignment last updated by Sotoa26 (talk) 16:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Humanities 2 1400-present

message: The Canada flag icon for participating nations seems dated/incorrect?  SquashEngineer (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag Icon
Talk:Union Pacific 737

message: I think this article is far too long for its own good Refdoc 00:29, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yes, I will agree, I just copied it from a public domain government site.  Greenmountainboy 02:29, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: *The bulk of this article seems to be under the wrong heading.  It's information about the Union Pacific Railroad, when the article title is UP 737, a particular (classic) engine.  The article should probably be renamed, or the entire body scrubbed. Daelin 09:56, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't seem to have an article on Union Pacific, I'm moving it there. JesseW 22:24, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Very cool. Daelin 05:28, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article length 
Talk:The Daily Telegraph

message: The Telegraph was founded 168 years ago in 1855. The "Premature obituaries" subsection in the "Criticism" section lists three examples in The Telegraph's history of publishing premature obituaries. The only source for this is a 2001 article by a journalist in The Telegraph itself. Is this really "criticism"? Many media outlets in many countries do occasionally print mistakes or occasionally publish premature obituaries, often due to a technical or human error. In my view the "Premature obituaries" subsection is WP:UNDUE in the criticism section, as apart from the journalist in The Telegraph mentioning three mistakes made in different years, there is no other reference to state The Telegraph was criticised for these errors.
In the subsection "Accusation of antisemitism" there is only one person, Owen Jones of The Guardian, who has made the accusation of antisemitism against The Telegraph for publishing articles which have espoused a Cultural Marxism / antisemitic conspiracy theory. Apart from an op-ed / Guardian column from Jones, there is no other person listed in a reference who has accused The Telegraph of antisemitism. In my view, the "Accusation of antisemitism" subsection may also be WP:UNDUE given the absence of criticism regarding this from anybody in a reference apart from Owen Jones.
Guidelines at WP:CRIT also state: "In most cases separate sections devoted to criticism, controversies, or the like should be avoided in an article because these sections call undue attention to negative viewpoints." Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premature obituaries and criticism section 

message: The redirect デイリー・テレグラフ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Certes (talk) 18:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:デイリー・テレグラフ]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Landsmannschaft Ostpreußen

message: *Landsmannschaft Schlesien Landsmannschaft Ostpreussen The associations actually require that members or their ancestors were born in respective region. People that emigrated from Silesia 1950-2003 as the ethnic Germans, are also included. Nico  refused to state the truth. He insists that all members were expelled. He also uttered Even the migrants must be considered expellees, since their homeland was under occupation and Germans generally was discriminated and threatened in these areas.  Source User talk:Nico The paragraph indicates, that Nico is a revisionists, that don't accept existing borders (under occupation) I am not sure if we want to have revisionsts Wikipedia? WolfgangPeters
I thought it would be correct to name them expellees, as that is what they name themselves. When they emigrated, Germany had not recognised the current borders. But do as you want. And in any event, what is wrong with considering East Prussia rightfully German, in accordance with international law (the Geneva protocols states: "It is illegal to permanently keep land militarily taken over and to expell and to replace the inhabitants") -- Nico 01:43, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: Why Ostpreussen and not Ostpreußen in the article title? —Tkinias 07:54, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  My wrong, other edits were not vandalism. Whether landsmanchafts plays significant role in German politics would be better discussed on its page, to create consensus. Once more my apology for quick and wrong judgement. Pavel Vozenilek 20:40, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:James Edward Smith (botanist)

message: Thanks for making a start Smallweed Norwikian 03:31, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The redirect Sm. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  BD2412 T 02:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Sm.]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of Roman imperial victory titles

message: This article needs a different title.  Maybe List of victory titles of Roman Emperors? RickK 03:37, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The agnomen Germanicus does not mean "the German". There were no Germans in those days and Germanicus was a nobleman of old Roman stock.
The mistake is easily made but the agnomen is related to the English "Of", as in Montgomery of Alamein. Monty was not from North Africa, he was victorious there.<BR>
Germanicus can be translated as "conqueror of Germania" or "victorious in Germania" or "Victorious against the Germanic tribes". As the Romans never conquered these dark forrests the second alternative seems appropriate.<BR>
The list is valuable. There is a lot of work in it and it is certainly encyclopædic.
Greetings from the once dark, now sunny forrests of Germania,
Robert Prummel 22:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A wrong translation from the Latin agnomen 

message: I agree with a retitling if this list focuses strictly on the Imperial period.  I would, however, also like to see a listing of victory titles in the Republican period.  The article on victory titles is good about this, but again I'd like to see a more comprehensive list starting in the Republican era.
Chris Ann Matteo68.50.98.131 10:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imperial Roman Victory Titles 

message: I have removed this line from the description of Maximinus Thrax - **Thrax ("the victor in Thracia"), ??. It wasn't a victory title, but a mention of his origin - from Thracia. It's "Maximinus the Thracian", not "Maximinus the conqueror of Thrace". -- Flavius T (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximinus Thrax 

message: I don't think those can be interpreted as victory titles. Frederick was king of Italy, Sicily, Jerusalem and Arles. Those look to me like royal titles in the style of victory titles. According to Kantorowicz, Frederick was imitating Justinian's Digest. Srnec (talk) 00:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frederick II
Talk:Yoruba language

message: Some Issues In The Grammar Of Modern Yoruba A. Afolayan. I believe this might help. Komitsuki (talk) 11:24, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Issues In The Grammar Of Modern Yoruba A. Afolayan 

message: I tagged two references to DELAB International Newsmagazine as needing a better source. After some searching, I can find no evidence that this magazine actually exists. Worldcat has no record of it, and mentions of it are limited to Wikipedia and pages which use Wikipedia as a source. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 08:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly non-existent source 

message: There are citations of Mumin & Versteegh 2014; Hofheinz 2018, Hunwick 1995, but the complete titles, dates etc are not present in the bibliography. Also, the text says that 'the earliest documented history of the people, which is traced to the latter part of the 17th century, was in the Yoruba language but in the Arabic script'. If such a text as a 17th-century history of the Yoruba people exists, it would be very important and should be mentioned in the article 'Yoruba literature', and it ought to have its own article, too. However, I suspect that this is due to some confusion and that there is no such text. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unspecified references
Talk:List of Governors-General of the Irish Free State

message: Were there only three? There won't be anymore, right? This is not a list! :-> It will be a stub for an eternity. It is better merged into Governor-General of the Irish Free State (like what is done with US president, which, note, has a longer, ungoing list). --Menchi (Talk)â 04:38, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:List of states with nuclear weapons

message: This article was a featured list for a year about 15 years ago.  Seems like most or all of the issues in the demotion thread are obsolete or resolved.  I propose that we put it back up for promotion LbPirate (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this list be featured? 

message: Israeli Minister of Heritage Amihai Eliyahu said that "dropping an atomic weapon on Gaza is [a] the possible opt I think this qualifies them for admitting they have Nuclear Weapons.ions."
https://twitter.com/spectatorindex/status/1721070704806989884 AddInfinty (talk) 10:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He was rebuked and suspended from his job for saying it, so it cannot be read to constitute official Israeli policy. NPguy (talk) 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israel should be moved out of the presumed Category 

message: Unless the tiny state of French Guiana has some of its parent countries nukes, this map is wrong. 72.33.0.176 (talk) 01:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's French, that is why. Slatersteven (talk) 09:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Guiana Nukes
Talk:Stroke volume

message: Re:What happens to haemoglobin after several weeks of exercise?
--210.54.53.12 01:06, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  what happens to haemoglobin after several weeks of excersice? 

message: The article reads: "Stroke volume (SV) is the volume of blood pumped by the right/left ventricle of the heart in one contraction.
The stroke volume is not all of the blood contained in the left ventricle. The heart does not pump all the blood out of the ventricle.".   So does it include the right ventricle output or not?  I believe not, but this is unclear.  Thanks --Irrevenant [ talk ] 04:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right ventricle or no?
Talk:Grünwald–Letnikov derivative

message: I know you're just starting (and it's a very good initial page), so maybe you already plan to get to these things, but most of the notation isn't clear, or I should say, it assumes the reader knows a lot.  In the general derivative formula near the end, someone might not know what the binomial coefficient notation means outside of the standard context. Also, I'm not sure myself what R(q) is, should it just be q instead? Revolver
: Is it supposed to be something like q∈R and q<0 or something? Dysprosia 05:32, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are asking whether it's original research, no.  The sources areshould be listed at the bottom of the article page. They are listed on the main fractional calculus page. Kevin Baastalk 14:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Fergus mac Róich

message: umm...courtesan?  Can that word be used with respect to a man? john 05:34, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Aparently he had a son called Ciar,  Blacksmith talk 01:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferguss Son?
Talk:Allied Control Authority (ACA)

message: Can somebody get this picture to move over to the left a bit?  I've tried everything I know to do, but it's too far right.  RickK 06:41, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: How's that? I fudged the div a bit but  the image is too darned wide, and probably needs to be cropped or resized. Dysprosia 06:45, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Tampon

message: — Assignment last updated by Aksgpp3131 (talk) 07:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice

message: There was a video called the Gojo figure incident. It shows a girl with her Gojo (from Jujutsu Kaisen) figure, at the start she wringed the tampon overtop of the figure's head, then hanging the tampon over figure's extended arm. It was uploaded on TikTok until it was removed and reuploaded on Twitter/X. Here's the link I found https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/gojo-figure-incident
Should we add this to the article? OnionBoy779 (talk) 12:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The tampon incident?
Talk:Weavers' Way

message: Who was Weaver? Kingturtle 07:43, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not named after a person, but a reference to the local weaving industry according to the local council website  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.252.52 (talk) 21:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Néstor Kirchner

message: and others. There are no full bibliographical details for Majul 2006 or Dominguez 2010 in Bibliography or anywhere else in the article. Please add them. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Check again the bibliography section. The full details are there. 
* 
*  Cambalachero (talk) 12:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken short citations 

message: Problems of these bios: 
Lack neutraliity and are used in plolitical warfare
Cite biased sources and references FrankRhymez (talk) 10:51, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please check your English and speak with more clarity. Did you try to say "political warfare"? What is that supposed to mean? Cambalachero (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urgwnt llocking and revising of argwntinean politicians bios 

message: The lede starts with Kirchner's name, Nestor Carlos Kirchner Ostoic, but I'm pretty sure that it should just be Nestor Carlos Kirchner, given that at the time, it was the norm in Argentina to only use the father's last name, instead of also the mother's as it is common in the rest of Latin America (and now also increasingly common in Argentina, but again, it wasn't at the time). Guyermou (talk) 20:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name is probably wrong
Talk:Political family

message: Does anyone have a SOURCE for the assertion that Moktar Ould Daddah, the former president of Mauritania, is related to Charles de Gaulle, the former president of France?  I'm not being skeptical, I just want a fairly reputable source.  Also, if we could know the exact nature of the relationship (e.g. son-in-law, brother-in-law, etc) that would be helpful. Davidcannon 11:48, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: France/Mauritania

message: I am trying to find out if the presidents named "Chamorro" from Nicaragua are related. I read in a bio of Pedro Joaquín Chamorro that he was "descended from a long line of statesmen" or something like that. Any relation to Fruto Chamorro, Emiliano Chamorro Vargas or others? --Sesel 05:41, 23 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Nicaragua
Talk:AD 24

message: Could someone put a disambig link to 24/7 (disambiguation) at the top, if you agree that this should be here too?. I can't figure out the syntax atm to add it to the other two. Thanks. Ingolfson 13:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DAB link

message: I removed "Year 24 was a leap year starting on Saturday (link will display the full calendar) of the Julian calendar." They didn't have leap years back then, did they? If I am wrong, please put it back in. Kingturtle (talk) 20:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they did. Leap years were introduced with the Julian calendar in the 40s BC. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 21:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  leap year? 

message: I don't get what the big deal in making 24 automatically direct to the TV Series I mean I bet if there was a counter for every person that typed in 24 and got this dumb page, and then had to click the Disamb link  I bet there are 0 people who actually searched for this page...  70.236.8.200 (talk) 17:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a continuity issue. Kingturtle (talk) 17:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  24 Linkage 

message: This is an odd statement since most of the events recorded in the "New Testament" hadn't happened yet.  Was Philo referring to the prophecy in Jeremiah?  If that were the case, then was the meaning more like "god's eternal law is the new testament" and what does he mean by that? doctorwolfie (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Philo
Talk:Victor/Victoria

message: "female singer...takes a job as a man masquerading as a woman" -- how can a woman be as a man who masquerades as a woman? W-M-W? I don't see the logic. --Menchi (Talk)â 10:19, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: See the Film

message: I'm not going to edit anything, both for being tired and having not seen the movie or play, but it seems to me comments regarding which song is the 'most beautiful number' isn't very factual, encyclopedia-like information.
:Bwahahaha.  I was just going to add the same comment :) --Ecksemmess (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I do not want to move the article and make a mess so I will just comment here that IMDB says that the 1982 version of the film is called Victor Victoria without the sign /. Does anybody want to move it? --FedericoMP (talk) 07:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official title 

message: There is another, missing musical number in that section; between "Lady of Seville..." and "You and I"- the he/she musical number. The music is great, the staging is excellent- it should be included in the musical numbers sectionDcrasno (talk) 03:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing musical number- 

message: Could it be that Victoria's make-up in her disguise of Victor is a reference to the Emcee in the 1972 Cabaret? Or my observation falls into 'original research'?89.178.149.210 (talk) 07:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A reference to ""Cabaret""?
Talk:Ancient Mystical Order of the Rose Cross

message: According to my knowledge there is no organization named "Ancient Mystical Order of the Rose Cross" different from AMORC (Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis). "Rosicrucian Order, AMORC" is protected by US law, so I dont think that another organization could use a so similar name. Rose Cross is the English translation of the Latin Rosae Crucis, so "Ancient Mystical Order of the Rose Cross" must be the proper English translation of "Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis". This page was a redirection to "Rosicrucian", but I redirected the page to AMORC. If anybody is aware of some organization named "Ancient Mystical Order of the Rose Cross" different than "Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis", please contact me at my talk page. Optim 13:24, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:List of US Presidents who have also been Vice President

message: This is a repeat of what is already included in Vice President of the United States. I will redirect if there are no explicit objections. --Jiang | Talk 13:29, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only that, but this page is an orphan and George Bush is a disambiguation page. --Jiang | Talk 13:30, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:The Settlers of Catan/copyright and fair use

message: *:Image:Soc-bank-usa.jpg, :Image:Soc-bank-euro.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-yearofplenty-usa.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-yearofplenty-euro.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-soldier-usa.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-soldier-euro.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-roadbuilder-usa.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-roadbuilder-euro.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-monopoly-usa.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-monopoly-euro.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-chapel-usa.jpg, :Image:Soc-dev-chapel-euro.jpg.  Copyrighted game cards from the Settlers of Catan game.  RickK 04:29, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  From Poss. Copyright Infringements 

message: The entire second paragraph of the article is lifted verbatim from the entire third paragraph on , and then subsequent paragraphs of the article were lifted whole from the same source and barely edited at all.  When I went to check out the other source, I was astounded to discover that I had read all of it before.  If there is any limit to how much you can lift verbatim from another source without a copyright violation, then I am certain this article exceeds it. Aumakua 03:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Entire'' second paragraph and beyond, blatant violation
Talk:Third Way

message: The edits all say that "third way" is also called "Third Way Neoliberalism" which I have ZERO source for, even though i have provided a source for why it it sometimes called "Modernised Social Democracy". This editor continues putting original information, and makes the blatantly untrue assertion that "Third Way" is a synthesis of Neoliberal Economic policy and centre-left social policy MrFluffster (talk) 03:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone keeps editing this page with poor grammar and the edits are incorrect  

message: While social democracy can today be seen as a 3rd way, the only consistent meaning of "3rd" way is that between the (Old Anarchist and) Communist ideologies based on the writings of Marx. 
This is more commonly taken to mean specifically the "3rd way" during the run up to WW2, which was Fascism or National socialism; In other words, full "incorporation" into the corporate state, also known as totalitarianism. 
Thus, according to proponents, both capitalism and socialist variants of the old were to be avoided, but to that extent also capitalism fully utilized and socialism fully implemented in a more fundamental way than by trying to "undo" the productive capital forces. 
There should be historical sources available for these, but I am currently lacking them. 
~~ 83.255.180.77 (talk) 23:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assuming that 3rd way means social democracy is a completely ahistorical fallacy