lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Quebec Veto Reference

message: I fleshed out this article and removed the stub designator. My source for all the changes I made was the text of the SCC decision. In particular I tried to clarify that the Quebec Veto Reference was entirely about the existence of a constitutional convention, as opposed to a legal question. To put it another way, even if the opinion in this case had gone the other way, and the SCC had agreed with the Quebec Attorney General regarding a Quebec Veto, it wouldn't have affected the legal status of the Constitution Act, 1982. In essence, the case raised an issue about the "legitimacy" of the Canada Act 1982, not its "legality".  When I have some time I will revise the article on the Patriation Reference. --Mathew5000 02:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer a stub
Talk:R v Perka

message: I have updated this file with details of the investigation. I would like to add more categories to the file, but am confused as to where to put it. It could go under true crime or law enforcement. Any ideas? Ediza8 01:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - Jaime DeJesus Cordoba-Varga was my uncle by marriage.  I'm looking for your citation on being killed by a girlfriend in 1982.  There are many theories, and the girlfriend was definitely blamed by DEA, but other interviews have suggested other possibilities and we are curious as these events left indelible imprints on our entire family for generations and the children now are trying to make sense of what happened. Oldcircusbread (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I gave this article a 'start' class rating today; although it is far more complete than most other Canadian law articles it needs more referencing and wikification.  PKT(alk) 21:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:R v Therens

message: Check the SCC decision on the website...  it did violate his right to retain counsel.
 Per Dickson C.J. and McIntyre, Lamer and Le Dain JJ.: Respondent's rights under s. 10(b) of the Charter were violated. A person who complied with a demand, pursuant to s. 235(1) of the Criminal Code, to accompany a police officer to a police station and to submit to a breathalyser test is "detained" within the meaning of s. 10 of the Charter and that person is therefore entitled to be informed of his right to retain and instruct counsel without delay.
This really screwed me up studying for Constitutional Law!  I modified the wiki entry.
Yes, it's incorrect. "The Court held that section 235(1) of the Criminal Code, which allowed a police officer to demand a breathalyzer test, violated the accused's right to retain counsel."
s.235(1) did not violate the accused's right to retain cousel. The police officer violated the accused's rights by not telling him of his rights to retain and instruct counsel without delay.
Because of the officers wrongdoing, the evidence obtained has to be disregarded, because allowing it, would bring the administration of justice into disripute.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.205.55.66 (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This brief is flat out wrong
Talk:Susan Golding

message: I have stubbed and protected the article based on POV concerns expressed to the Wikimedia Foundation by family members. Many claims (such as 'financing political campaigns,' 'effectively destroyed career,' etc.) were baldly stated as fact, when in truth they are in quite a bit of dispute. When the article is unlocked, it must be written dispassionately, neutrally and in a balanced manner that does not give undue weight to any one view of Susan Golding and her career. FCYTravis 11:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubbing

message: Under the excuse of POV, this article has been whitewashed to remove all unfavorable remarks were removed, although documented.  "Balanced" does not mean removing everything unfavorable to a person. Dananderson 05:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: There was a pretty serious effort made to fire Golding before her last term was over.  Didn't work, but she's not mayor anymore, anyway.
Golding's judicial system in San Diego was a shambles, there's no way for anyone to deny that.  Such injustice.  No mention of that on her Wikipedia page, no mention of how Alan Bersin really ended up in the San Diego school district, no mention of why the San Diego federal Office of Personnel Management got closed down, or how they had a federal {that's right, a federal.  Not city, county, or state) civil service test given in the same room(s) that the local civil service tests are given in, being the Silver and Copper Rooms in the Civic Center.  Why did this happen?  Because Golding has outside influences in her decision-making process.  Outside influences from where?
Go find out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.245.123.17 (talk) 05:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fired!

message: Golding's only connection to Oklahoma, according to this article, is her birth in Muskogee. It's an interesting factoid, but not really evidence of subsequent notability. She obviously does belong in WP:California. Perhaps she should be linked to WP: Indiana, where she went to college. I propose to delink her from WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Connection to WP:Oklahoma
Talk:Violette Nozière

message: I revised this on the strength of having seen the film the previous evening.  The previous effort seemed well-intentioned but was not in fluent English (Violette had a "permanent man acquaintance").  --Andersonblog (have forgotten my password it seems) --76.107.198.249 (talk) 22:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: The link to Guy Hoffman leads to the incorrect actor. The correct actor has a French wiki page 132.147.29.189 (talk) 23:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guy Hoffman
Talk:Children of the Sun (role-playing game)

message: I added the info from the Dieselpunk article into this article - it perhaps needs to be skimmed down. 87.80.126.226 00:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Waco: The Rules of Engagement

message: Added a citation needed tag to the statement in parentheses about one version of the production having been forced off the market by...... Seems slightly NPOV in nature and has no reference cited. I intend to delete the statement in no references are given after 14 days.Radiooperator 21:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Strategic Air Command

message: It looks like to me all types of SAC aircraft are listed in the article.  So it seems the Strategic Air Command Aircraft link should be in the See Also section.  -Fnlayson 01:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The 65th Air Division was the headquarters for US air defense units in Spain.  It was assigned to Sixteenth Air Force, which until 1960 was part of Strategic Air Command, although it was transferred to United States Air Forces Europe later.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAC aircraft 

message: the org charts being full size in the middle of the page were really messing things up.
i thumb'd them down, and set them over to the right side. since this made the sections too long (the embelem + chart would go past the text), I moved the emblems to the left side when necessary.
– Fʀɪɺøʟɛ ( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs ) 01:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Damned fine idea, now no one can read them. ThaNKS. 71.51.90.0 19:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to read them, all you have to do is click on them. I doubt that most people who read this article are concerned with the organization of the SAC in 1947 anyway. – Fʀɪɺøʟɛ ( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs ) 05:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  org charts 

message: I think Senior Enlisted Advisors should be merged into this article, and that Senior Enlisted Advisors ‎should be a redirect. Enigma message 17:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it's WP:NN on its own. Utan Vax (talk) 18:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't even think the info is notable here. I'd rather see the info just deleted by whatever method is appropriate. - BillCJ (talk) 19:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I redirected it to this article. Enigma message 03:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: SAC's mailed fist crest is iconic. Seems rather odd that it doesn't appear anywhere in this article except as a linked image from the rather generic early emblem shown - should be the other way around.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.66.32 (talk) 05:36, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mailed Fist 

message: Even though there is a section entitled, “Nuclear missiles, aircrew readiness, airborne alert, and strategic reconnaissance”, there is almost no mention at all of SAC’s recon mission. This is already a long article, but this was a huge focal issue for SAC almost from its inception. Needs to be added. TadgStirkland401 (talk) 03:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAC Reconnaissance 

message: The list of SAC Commanders should be a page linked to from this article. Thoughts? TadgStirkland401 (talk) 03:48, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Previous Commanders 

message: Every little minutia of the hierarchy, past and present, in IMAX theatre seems a little much for the lay reader. Reminds me of the old joke that the Russians are the adversary, while the Army is the enemy. — MaxEnt 14:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead overwhelmed with inside baseball
Talk:Mystery Street

message: Harvard Medical School is indeed in Roxbury, however Roxbury is a Boston neighborhood. This is a trifling matter but worth mentioning, especially as Harvard and all its affiliated hospitals in the medical area now list Boston as their official place of residence, while they used to list it as Roxbury. The reason for the change is the change in the racial composition of the neighborhood, which for decades gave Roxbury a "bad" reputation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Telegonus (talk • contribs) 04:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:I Was a Communist for the FBI

message: This article needed some fleshing out, so I did just that. I created more distinct sections for the film and the radio series and added more information, with sources. In addition, I pared down to two listening links - the Internet Archive page that has almost every show, and a Libsyn podcast link, which seems to be slowly putting up all available shows in chronological order. The Libsyn link is there as an alternate, and a possible source for better sounding shows in some cases. The FreeOTR link was removed, since that page only has ten shows available, and only via streaming. It duplicated the Internet Archive page, which has the same streaming feature. --Fightingirish (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:The Prowler (1951 film)

message: This article is too short and is missing information on the film's production and release (theatrical and home media), the reception section on the film only has one review on the film and there should be more information added to it.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has added more reviews, and I just added a production section.  --  Pete Best Beatles (talk) 06:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

text: The missing info for me is how the police officer at the end gets to shoot a man in the back who is no threat. A most odd ending to the movie! Little grape (talk) 16:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information and Expansion 

message: I'll add the citations tomorrow.  --  Pete Best Beatles (talk) 07:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  new blacklist section
Talk:The Captive City (1952 film)

message: The version I watched for free on You Tube (ok.ru>Classic Movies Kristine Rose) had a written prologue and a spoken epilogue, but both this article and the book Film Noir: An Encyclopedic Reference (var. authors, Overlook Press 1992, avail. at Internet Archives) say Kefauver speaks in person for both.Pete Best Beatles (talk) 06:30, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kefauver in Prologue 

message: I put the second section in past tense because it takes place in a flash back.Pete Best Beatles (talk) 03:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verb tense
Talk:The Sniper (1952 film)

message: When Eddie's supervisor at the dry cleaning job talks to the man on the cable car about the newspaper story, he reads from the newspaper article that the police found a clue: "police laboratory technicians report that the bandage is from a man's right hand". How in the world would they know it's from the RIGHT hand? Pelwinj (talk) 11:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goofs
Talk:The Thief (1952 film)

message: At about 8:00, during the first instance of photographing papers, Fields takes several photos with his Minox camera. After the last photo, he opens the camera to remove the film cassette. This would ruin the last picture taken; he should have advanced the film once or twice before opening the back of the camera.
When the fingerprints in the stolen car are being photographed, the 4x5 inch press camera is way too close. To make a photo that close, the camera front would have to be extended quite a bit more than is shown.
Dlhagerman (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographic goofs
Talk:The House I Live In (1945 film)

message: The Josh White article states that the song was first recorded by White, then White taught it to Frank Sinatra. If true, this should probably be mentioned in the article. Badagnani 22:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read that too, but can't find a relaiable enough ciatation. :( Gareth E Kegg 22:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Josh White]]

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of "needs infobox" tag

message: I don't have time to fix it right now, but the "first performance" of the title song here is off. Earl and Abel finished this song off in the spring of 1942 and Robinson was playing it around... I think the first performance was at the 2nd Cavalcade of American Folk Music in June 1942. At least so says the Daily Worker article from then, which mentions its anticipated debut. I know for certain that Robinson sang it on September 5, 1942, in Seattle, at the Moore Theatre, when he also debuted Abe Lincoln Comes Home Again (eventually called The Lonesome Train). I have the program from that night. That's original research, but surely there's something published somewhere that confirms that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.104.7 (talk) 23:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: First Performance
Talk:It Happened in Brooklyn

message: Why wasn't there Any mention of the behind the scenes of this movie? 
Especially concerning about what happened to that amazing child prodigy, Bobby Long.
He really stole the show and he could've been the main kid that Frank & Co. would've paid attention to if Leo Kardos (Billy Roy) wasn't the substitute. 
Bobby Long had everything! The talent, the charm, the likeability, everything that screams "He's the male alternative of Shirley Temple!" 
What's most disturbing is that he never got to appear in another movie after that or anything else like tv, voice acting, or live performing. He had Completely disappeared without Any explanation. 
Do I suspect something wrong with this picture? Because apparently this picture (movie) was Bobby Long's one & only. 76.218.115.149 (talk) 15:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bobby Long
Talk:R v Keegstra

message: Just a matter of semantics, really, but rather that "the Court upheld the Criminal Code of Canada provision prohibiting the willful promotion of hatred against an identifiable group as constitutional under the freedom of expression provision in section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms", shouldn't it state that it was upheld under section 1 of the Charter?  Section 2(b) was the section violated, rather than the section which upheld it as constitutional.  Or does this sentence mean that the prohibition is constitutional in spite of section 2(b)? Thoughts, anyone?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.254.245 (talk) 04:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Section 1 or 2?

message: Does the TV story have any bearing at all on the original case? It does not seem to be about the case itself or any of the people cited in the case. What if anything makes this TV story about R v Keegstra rather than about Holocaust denialism?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.173.247 (talk) 10:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the media
Talk:Live at Bull Moose (Regina Spektor EP)

message: I guess I screwed up the title of the page/article, according to WP:ALBUMS. What's it supposed to be, and how do I fix it? Fubaz 01:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably should be just "Live at Bullmoose EP".  I'll move it to there. - THE GREAT GAVINI {T-C} 08:44, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:JT LeRoy/Archive 3

message: Hello, I'm responding to a request for help made to the Cabal. As that request is a couple of weeks old now (sorry!), could people fill me in on the current situation, and what (if anything) they'd like to see changed? PS try to keep it brief :-) Dan100 (Talk) 16:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone involved is interested in mediation, just leave a note for me on my talk page Dan100 (Talk) 14:39, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Dan100. Thanks for coming around. :) I think that, through the power of positive collaboration, the community here has reached a consensus on the controversy at hand. Thanks for checking in with us! --Animated Cascade talk 20:36, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cabal arrives, eventually... 

message: Today's NYT has a piece called "The Unmasking of JT Leroy: In Public, He's a She."  They give evidence that JT Leroy's public face is Savannah Knoop, half-sister of Laura Albert's husband Geoffrey Knoop. I also NPOVed the opening, but the whole biography needs an NPOV rewrite (regardless of past edit wars). Jokestress 23:46, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read your edits, and I personally find them completely appropriate. You've done what I've been trying to do for weeks now. Thanks for stepping in, but be prepared for pushback.--Animated Cascade talk 00:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed, rewrite is necc as article prepares for its 'cooling off' phase, as factual disputes are all pretty much moot. I believe a lot of evidence (for and against) over the identity scandal can be removed and decimated (the letter, for instance, should be referenced but its entirety is no longer neccessary, just historic. Not even United States Constitution contains the actual constitution, full text, in entirety. Suffice it to be known that a letter was written in response). Regardless of how the vote to merge goes, I suspect that the articles will eventually be merged merely for the sake of readability, and because it may very well be the most notable thing Laura Albert is recognized for. I am speaking strictly in terms of press publicity and general public attention.Yeago 06:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking today's NYT piece
Talk:Ciego de Ávila

message: I just wondered about the etymology of Ciego in this city name, and the same for Arriete-Ciego Montero
--disdero (talk) 11:34, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ciego = blind ? 
Talk:Lei Wulong

message: Lei Wulong isn't only one of two characters to have appeared in all Tekkens, but one, Kazuya was appeared in every Tekken, but 3, his replacement was Jin, so that makes 3.
"italic" textIt appears that Lei has two voice actors in Tekken 5. One has an obvious Chinese accent, which you can hear in his pre- and post-match sound bites, as well as his fighting cries. But in a couple of his sound bites, as well as his ending, he speaks English with more of an American English accent. Any clue as to who the two are? Poofyspikes 01:40, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lady on a Train

message: The plot states that Margo Martin is murdered but the character isn't killed in the movie, seen it on sat channel Yesterday over Christmas, not blaming writer as at least one other plot synopsis of this movie on internet also makes the same error. hopefully someone can sort out a more accurate plot synopsis in future.86.11.32.155 (talk) 23:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section is inaccurate
Talk:I Married a Monster from Outer Space

message: I've expanded the intro, review and plot section. The film is good and important enough, historically speaking. There's also a German entry now.--Robert Kerber (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Modifications
Talk:Hammett (film)

message: Hey folks. 
In Organic Chemistry there is a guy called Hammett (or at least there used to be one) and he made so-called "Hammett plots".
Do you think someone shoulda/woulda mention that here or make an disambiguation page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.132.30.133 (talk • contribs) 
:Is there a Wikipedia article about this chemist named Hammett?  Is he notable enough that an aricle is worthwhile?  If the answer to these questions is no, than the matter is moot.  If there already is an article about him, than a disambiguation page may be necessary. ---Charles 18:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: Can anyone identify the building used as an establishing shot for Hammett's meeting with all the "Big Rich", at approx. 1:18:00 ?
It appears to be a grand mansion high on a hill, with a semicircular, colonnaded entrance, and at least a few trees opposite (left side of screen).  The view seems to be to the east, with San Francisco Bay and wide hills in the background.  BMJ-pdx (talk) 16:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity of "Big Rich" house?
Talk:Kill Me Again

message: The plot section of this article is wrong, the first part of it consists of the story she tells, which isn't true. NotYourFathersOldsmobile (talk) 12:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section is wrong