Talk:Evaluation

message: Anyone who has a particular interest in research/evaluation methods and methodology, there is currently a huge duplication between the :Category:Research methods and :Category:Evaluation methods. Please see the discussion on Category_talk:Research methods and add your opinion. JenLouise 05:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation methods 

message: The first line reads
:"Evaluation" is a systematic, continuous and comprehensive process of determining the growth and progress of the pupil towards objectives or values of the curriculum.
This is too narrow. Evaluation in education is perhaps the most obvious, but the broadest theoretical outlines treat it in relation to the "six Ps": "program, personnel, performance, policy, proposal, and product" . I will therefore employ just the second paragraph as an adequate definition.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.236.18 (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition (first line of article) 

message: an autospy? and then weird brackets {}
Whats this good for?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.48.231.247  (talk) 15:57, 14 March 2011 
:Re this edit: I googled that name thinking it was a hoax, but I found a management presentation by a person of Somali origin (in ordinary English letters, Abdirahman Mihile; compare the name Cabdiraxmaan Axmed Cali). Autopsy (not autospy) is also a real word, which in context was related to summative evaluation. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  autopsy!{by Cabdiraxman Mixile} 

message: evaluation is not true because their is no proof of what happened in their eyes.  the Bible tells the truth not some scientist that thinks he can tell how old a skulls age is just because of a super computer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.124.224.52 (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You may be looking for Evolution theory. Cheers! CharlieEchoTango (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  evalution true? 

message: I have reviewed a large portion of the article in relation to more general copyediting, but do not have expertise in this area, so it would definitely benefit from a knowledgeable look-over.--Soulparadox 09:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki standards and bare URLs 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Evaluation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091015044732/http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc/ to http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Evaluation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120429201744/http://www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp to http://www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: اريد تنزيل لعبه بيس لأنني احبها جدا جدا جدا جدا 37.238.31.19 (talk) 11:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  اريد تنزيل لعبه بيس لأنني احبها جدا جدا