lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Headquarters Joint Operations Command (Australia)

message: The intro needs to be simplified. First sentence should be a description that tells a reader from another country what it is and where it is, without over reliance on jargon or acronyms. Lester 21:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro needs simple definition 

message: Seem strange to have a HQJOC page but no JOC page?  Perhaps the article should be altered to become a JOC page with a section about HQ JOC???
--TinTin (talk) 22:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds sensible Nick-D (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: No JOC page more generally

message: This article says it's adjacent to the Kowen district of the Australian Capital Territory, just south of the Kings Highway, about 15 km east of Queanbeyan and 15 km south of Bungendore. No mention of it being in NSW, in fact it sounds from that as though it's in the ACT.
The Australian Defence Force article says Operational command of the ADF is exercised by HQJOC, which is located at a purpose-built facility near Bungendore, New South Wales.
The Chief of Joint Operations (Australia) article speaks of a separate CJOPS position based at the Headquarters Joint Operations Command (HQJOC) at Bungendore, New South Wales.
The Bungendore article doesn't mention the HQJOC at all. Andrewa (talk) 23:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is it 
Talk:Gerard Muirhead-Gould

message: I don't have the time to learn how to edit in Wikipedia, but this may be of interest ...
The subject of this article was Churchill's personal choice for 'C': I don't think he knew him, but he was not happy with the service the RN was then getting from SIS and it was the RN's turn to run the shop.
Anyway, Muirhead-Gould does not seem to have been popular. Most of the appointment process is at http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/results/r/?_q=FO%201093/127, which contains this anonymous memo   https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5HRcpumKwEjV0RIenlIS09BWlk/view?usp=sharing [which I shall leave in place until 1.1.17] and it says a lot about him. 
The comments at the head of the page signed AC are presumably by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Cadogan
C.cohen (talk) 18:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a popular man
Talk:À;GRUMH...

message: In this article, the artist names are spelled with a capital delta (SΔ3 Evets, JΔ3 Seuqcaj). However, on the band's official website, they're spelled without the delta (S3, J3 etc). On the album cover art the names are spelled with a symbol that looks like a circle inside a triangle between the capital letter and the digit. Though that symbol resembles a capital delta, it isn't one. Therefore I don't think the names should be spelled with a delta in Wikipedia.
For comparison, Discogs uses the delta, but MusicBrainz doesn't. Ehn (talk) 15:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist names 

message: There appear to be some more things wrong here. Check this: http://www.agrumh.com/weare.html which tells about the band initally made up from SΔ3 and PΔ3 (*NOT* to be confused with JΔ3!) This is also confirmed on the discogs page: http://www.discogs.com/artist/%C3%A0%3BGRUMH... which lists a certain PΔ3 Lacsap (obviously "Pascal" backwards) as ex-member. But logic tells me that PΔ3 *MUST* be one of the founding members. So either all three are founding members, or JΔ3 is not a founding member! This would have to be verified. -andy 92.229.89.81 (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More discrepancies from official website!
Talk:Kavisekhara Dr Umar Alisha

message: The article says he was a member of the National Legislative Assembly from 1936 to 1945. But which Assembly is this? I couldn't find any information about this. Is this the Vidhan Sabha? And if so, of what province/area/state/territory? AecisBrievenbus 12:25, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: prior to independence there is no indian parliament - the olden days National Legislative assembly is called as today as indian Parliament . he was elected as an independent contestent to the North Madras Constituency --Dr Ananda Kumar Pingali (talk) 18:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: legislative assembly
Talk:Muthu Tharanga

message: This has been directly copied from our website provided as a source, please do something about this as soon as possible.123.255.54.240 08:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope my removal of all but the first sentence is a satisfactory solution - if not, please reinstate the speedy deletion tag. Katharineamy 09:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Perhaps, but a lot of the original text was copied from SmartLanka.  Your edits improve things considerably.  Katharineamy 17:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion due to copyright violations
Talk:Shyampukur

message: I have done a modest bit of link editing to this article and noticed the geographical names Bagbazar, Baghbazar and Bagabazar very close to each other. As an infortunate Westerner who has never set foot in this beautiful country of India, I can't decide if they are the same name written differently, in which case a harmonization is needed, or if they are different names applying to different places; so I leave it to the knowledge of others. Thank you, have a nice day. Rosenknospe 12:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographical names 
Talk:Interstate 25 in Wyoming

message: River crossings...
You ought to explain where (by milepost) there are any crossings of major rivers, such as the North Platte River.47.215.183.159 (talk) 12:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  River crossings... 

message: In the Casper to Buffalo section, the final sentence currently reads: 
:Buffalo's I-25 Bus. and US 87 Bus. have their northern termini at a partial interchange just west of the I-25–I-90 junction.
I don't think this — or Google Maps — is up to date. First, the cited source appears to have been moved since I get a broken link. WYDOT's 2017 Maintenance Section Reference Book (the 98th page in the PDF since there are two initial unnumbered pages, Johnson County, the ML-59B table) appears to be a comparable source. If I'm interpreting it correctly, US 87 Business travels the full length from milepost 298.024 (the South Buffalo interchange at I-25 exit 298) to milepost 301.338 (the North Buffalo interchange at I-90 exit 56A [EB exit only, WB entrance only]). 
However, I-25 Business only goes from milepost 298.024 (South Buffalo interchange) to milepost 299.697, which has the notation "End ... I-25 Bus." Milepost 299.697 would appear to be where US 16 and I-90 Business turn east onto Hart St. They're described in the ML-1001B table, which makes no mention of I-25 Business. I conclude that the current north terminus of I-25 Business is at milepost 299.697, the intersection locally named North Main Street and East Hart Street. 
Could someone verify I'm interpreting the WYDOT reference correctly? Thank you!
Msramming (talk) 01:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: (Yes, replying to my own post.) Google Streetview, which reports being driven July 2018, shows an I-25 Business loop shield at the North Buffalo interchange EB exit. I'm not certain how to resolve the inconsistency between the signage and the log book. Msramming (talk) 01:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-25 Business in Buffalo
Portal talk:Belgium/Selected picture/2007

message: I think the image Elysette Namur nuit 2005-03-19.jpg should become the selected picture for December. The picture shows the Elysette, the seat of the Walloon Government, by night. It is today's (October 13) Picture of the day on the Wikimedia Commons. I think that an image of a building in Belgium that is considered to be one of the finest images on the Commons deserves a place here as a selected picture.--Ganchelkas 13:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Elysette by night

message: I think the image Australian infantry small box respirators Ypres 1917.jpg should become the selected picture for November. The image's description says: "Australian infantry wearing Small Box Respirators (SBR). The soldiers are from the 45th Battalion, Australian 4th Division at Garter Point, Ypres sector, 27 September 1917." It's a featured picture on the English Wikipedia and was the English Wikipedia's Picture of the day for May 22 2007. It was taken by Captain Frank Hurley.
Another picture that I think could be used for November is Morning a Passchendaele. Frank Hurley.jpg.--Ganchelkas 13:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infantry at Ypres
Talk:Sober companion

message: I suggest moving this article from Sober Coach to Sober companion (with a redirect of course), since it seems sober companion is by far the more commonly used term.  Any objections? -- SiobhanHansa 13:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: -- œ™ 05:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title?

message: There is a clear difference between sober coach and sober companion, with sober coach a name used mostly for marketing. If you do a google search for sober companion, you clearly see a strong distinction for the term. As a Sober Companion, I don't like to be confused with coaching. --99.61.53.113 (talk) 23:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sober companion
Talk:Fellside Recordings

message: If this article about a flourishing current British record labels gets deleted, then I hope I can look forward to seeing the deletion of this useless article: Amazorblades. They were a no-hope band who produced only one single, now out of print, which was never a hit. It is dignified by lots of Wikilinks, but is of no cultural significance whatsoever. The only reason it gets included is because of the association with the word "punk" - a holy cow to many people, regardless of artistic merit. Ogg 13:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's no point in having the entire catalogue here, and every musician who ever recorded for the label, but I'm not going to delete it. Yet.Vmavanti (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalogue
Talk:American Speed Association

message: This article should include the foundation and early history.  It should also mention its absorption of the defunct PRA (Pittsburgh Racing Association) group of drivers in the mid-70's when Heidelberg Raceway and it's sister tracks folded.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ched Davis (talk • contribs) 11:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry 'bout that Ched Davis (talk) 11:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good - please add it. Even a few sentences off the top of your head is fine. I am not familiar with that part of its history. Let me know if you have any questions. Royalbroil 12:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, that was back when I was in Sr. High, so even if OR were acceptable, it might be suspect.  I'll go through some of my old programs and such, the web isn't exactly "full" of that kind of information from the 70's but I'll give it an honest shot.  A lot of my old Speed Sport News, Circle Track, etc. mags got ruined in a flood a couple years back - so this may take a little time (especially during the holidays).  After the 1st though I'll go through my  Kulwicki, Wallace, and Martin stuff to and try to come up with decent work.  My primary time frame that I'm familiar with is the Eddy, Senneker, Benson, Wallace, etc. era of the late 70's through mid to late-80's.  Maybe add some of the tracks like Berlin, Salem, Winchester, Bristol etc. to it.  I'm hoping to dig up the missing 68 - 73 stats, but no promises.  You folks have a great holiday ... and I'll be back as soon as I can dig up some verifiable decent stuff.  Ched Davis (talk) 20:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

text: also ... I got some good shots from the 2007 Bristol race if they would help? ... guess I could paste on my google accnt. and you could d/l what you see fit. Ched Davis (talk) 20:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include 

message: I suggest a new page for the ASA STARS National Tour. IndySteve (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Article for National Tour
Talk:Algebra (disambiguation)

message: Which of the entries here does not relate to a branch of algebra?  This seems to be more of an index page to the series on algebra, than a disambiguation page.  But perhaps I have misunderstood, and some of the algebras here are not really part of the algebra branch of mathematics.   --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Branches of [[algebra]]?
Talk:Afrikan Spir

message: Does anyone know if an English translation has been published of Paroles d'un sage?
There are English quotations from that work on the Wikiquote page  but I think they have just been translated by an editor there.
Thanks, IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 08:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I'm aware, no complete translation has ever been published. At the beginning of the quotes page, an unknown editor wrote "This is a draft English version of all the "collected thoughts" (pages 36 to 62) of the book by Hélène Claparède-Spir, Paroles d'un sage...." but that comment was inserted back in 2009 when the page was first created. The only English translation of Spir's works that I know of is Thought and Reality, translated by Claude Bertin. Manbooferie (talk) 09:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  English translation of ''Paroles d'un sage''
Talk:Thomas Treadwell Davis

message: I noticed there is a succession box in this article that does not show in the read mode and only shows n the edt mode. Part of the information in the succession box incudes positions Davis was nominatedfor, which I have not seen in a succession boc before. I did not want to remove or make chages to the successio box until I heard from othe ediors regarding this. Thanks --BuzyBody (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession Boxes
Talk:Mugello Circuit

message: The name of corner 3 on the SVG file is misspelled.  According to the official information on www.mugellocircuit.it it should be "Poggio Secco".
74.95.46.250 (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can the SVG file get corrected? 

message: Nice F1 article. Nothing about anything including the newly resurfaced track.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.82.195.17 (talk) 23:37, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is resurfacing the track important? Routine maintenance of a facility is hardly worth a mention surely? If you have information of actual import, add it. Don't be shy.  --Falcadore (talk) 23:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is lame 

message: Do you have a citation for Zhou's fastest lap? The F2 results page only seems to include drivers that finished and no other sources I can find list the fastest lap. FozzieHey (talk) 16:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zhou fastest lap citation
Talk:The Kiwi Party

message: I think Future New Zealand and Christian Democrats should share one page upto the merge with United. And then this page should just reflect the Kiwi Party. Any other thoughts? Mattlore (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes this should be done, especially with an election looming.  While Kiwi clearly is a spiritual continuation of Future NZ, there's no official inheritance of assets or membership. Kelvinc (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-organisation

message: Given that the party is now moribund/merged with the Conservative Party, does it merit a seperate page, unless on historical grounds? Calibanu (talk)User Calibanu
It is certainly justified as a separate page. It was a separate party. Incidentally it did not merge with the Conservative Party. The statement that "On 8 February 2012, it requested that the New Zealand Electoral Commission cancel its registration, which rendered it wholly subsumed into the Conservative Party." is wrong. De-registration, and merger with another party, are two entirely different things, though often happen at the same time.Royalcourtier (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Elements of the Kiwi Party, including all of the then leadership, joined the Conservatives prior to the 2011 election and the Kiwi Party did not stand under its own name in that election. While there was no official merge, the fact that the leadership joined the Conservatives and advised their membership to support/vote/join with them makes this a defacto and unilateral merge - but not an official merge. Regardless of the subsequent or current state of the Kiwi Party it must remain as an independent article - we don't merge the Liberal Party and Reform Party articles into National Party article just because they merged in 1936, and the same policy applies here. Fan | talk | 07:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:John Toland

message: Does anybody know where John Toland's service was held (or where he went to service in Putney-London) or where he is buried ? Naoiseoh (talk) 13:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You should ask such questions at WP:RD/H. Sandstein (talk) 13:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Everything written here, without exception, points to Toland being an arch-Monarchist. He supported the new Germanic kings of England and he supported the occupation of Ireland by the forces of the King. This makes him a monarchist NOT a Republican. And the last sentence, that he was born to early or too late, is simply unmotivated (not to mention unscientific) nonsense that does not belong in an encyclopaedia!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.125.38 (talk) 14:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Republican?

message: The statement that Toland wrote "The Treatise of the Three Imposters" is not referenced. Instead, he was accused of being a possible author; I will try to find the reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roberto La Ferla (talk • contribs) 12:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. I have added "citation needed"-tags on the similar claim in Treatise of the Three Impostors. As far as I know several different versions of the work appeared in the first half of the 18th century, so claiming that "Toland wrote it" is false even if he did write one version of it. --Saddhiyama (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literary hoax "The Treatise of the Three Imposters" 

message: I'm really curious. - 70.179.80.120 (talk) 21:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the source of the only known image of John Toland? 

message: This article put "pantheism" as one of John Toland's interests in the infobox in the top right-hand corner and puts the article in the category "pantheism", but on Melvyn Bragg's In Our Time on October 8 2020, he was mentioned in a programme discussing Deism. Vorbee (talk) 11:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Deism and pantheism
Talk:USS R. B. Forbes

message: Do we want the parenthetical 1845 on the end of the name of this article? Any reason to not just call it USS R. B. Forbes? KConWiki (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not seeing any rationale for the parenthetical 1845, I am moving this article to the name USS R. B. Forbes. Please let me know if this is a problem. KConWiki (talk) 00:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming of article
Talk:Ian Maxwell (tracker)

message: The article said he published a book "Animal Tracks ID and Techniques". One would have thought that, except in the business world, it would be more noteworthy to be the author of a book than its publisher. A little web search on the book's publisher (Flame
Lilly Press, "Lilly" with 3 Ls) revealed no other work on its list nor a record at Companieshouse.gov.uk (the British register of companies).--SilasW 14:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who published his book?
Talk:NMP (political party)

message: I'm pretty sure there was an NMP campaign as the "New Millenium Party" on several radio stations. I have a feeling this was in the 2002 election. I'll update this page if I can find any citations, but I'm not hopeful. --54x (talk) 22:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Millenium Party?
Talk:Values Party

message: The United Tasmania Group, the predecessor of the Australian Greens claims to be first Greens party. Which one is correct? --Brandonfarris (talk) 13:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are correct, under different criteria. The United Tasmania Group was the first Green party - the Values Party was the first national green party. Fan | talk 12:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Reading the citations, and as per Fanx's point about the stipulation of "national level", it seems pretty clear that the Values Party is conisdered the first national-level Green party in the cited sources. While not an objective source as such, see also http://gp.org/greenpages-blog/?p=664. I'm removing the whom tag as it seems clear that the Values Party is one of the first Green parties, is regarded as one of the founding moments of the Green movement by people within the Green movement, and probably the first National-level Green Party. If anyone would like to argue the case, I suggest editing the sentence to "one of the first" and then bringing the debate back here. --54x (talk) 07:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to clarify, I only removed the first "by whom" template, as the claims about the party being widely regarded as the first envirnmental party, or as progenitors of the environment as a political issue needs further substantiation. --54x (talk) 07:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Seems strange to list the percentage of votes in the non-MMP elections that the Values Party contested. Percentages are meaningless in FPP elections. Can anyone shed any light on why this column is in the table? I don't know if this topic has been hashed out elsewhere.
Elguaponz (talk) 04:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *I think it's useful because it shows the level of support the party was receiving from the population as a whole, and in the process highlights the absurdity of the FPP system. That's relevant because as far as I know, the Values Party's vote is often held up as an example of the things that were going wrong with FPP, and of the level of protest voting that was going on (ie "We received this many votes and it came to naught!"). — Ballofstring (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote percentage - why?
Talk:Buenavista, Agusan del Norte

message: Unreliable posts should not be posted. Images also should follow licenses in order not to be deletd. 210.213.85.2 (talk) 15:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Biodiversity information

message: the information given here is ambiguous, to say the least. just like the information about something is not identical with the something itself (good point, but a bit aloof), informatics is about processing information and not identical with it. so: isn't the lemma really a misnomer? as it stands, i am all against keeping it as a separate lemma. -- Kku (talk) 10:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  informa-what 

message: Merge into Biodiversity Informatics, I would say. Makes more sense than defining wat 'information' is inside a specific field. Classical geographer (talk) 10:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Grace Grace

message: It looks like changes to the Miles Ministry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_ministry) aren't all reflected on the individual ministers' pages.  For example, here, Grace Grace has now become Minister for State Development and Infrastructure - but that isn't showing on this page.  That can also be confirmed from the official Cabinet webpage (https://cabinet.qld.gov.au/ministers-portfolios.aspx).  I can edit in the text of paragraphs, but my coding is VERY limited and I'm not confident to make those changes on this page.  Can anyone else help?  SeanLeader SeanLeader (talk) 05:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to edit a page - Grace Grace