lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Too Much, Too Little, Too Late

message: :Image:2much2little.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:2much2little.jpg
Talk:Too Young to Die: Singles 1990–1995

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No clear reason given for move. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Too Young to Die: Singles 1990–1995 →  – page already exists TlonicChronic (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 March 2024
Talk:Third Man Records

message: Third Man Pressing - the vinyl plant associated with Third Man Records - opened in 2017 and has gotten a fair amount of coverage in its own right (Rolling Stone, Pitchfork, Tape Op, etc). Would like to build out some detail on that, but wondering if it would be better as its own article or a section within this one? Hundopundo (talk) 03:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In agreement here, especially given the recent coverage of increasing demand for vinyl and persistent supply chain issues and White's plea to major record labels to erect additional vinyl press plants to address the issue. Pedialight (talk) 15:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

text: I agree with this entirely. There is an increase in the amount of demand for records and there is a lot of information that needs to be covered regarding Third Man Record's detailed and intricate pressing process.  Brookepauley (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Man Pressing 

message: With the number of line items accumulating under this Vault tab, wondering if Third Man Records Vault should have its own list page. Pedialight (talk) 15:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It definitely should have it's own page because of the mass amount on information regarding the vault subscriptions and the many different items included each quarter.  Brookepauley (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Man Records Vault
Talk:Steven Brill (filmmaker)

message: Look at [this side]. Some good informations about Brill. Sorry, that I can´t explain it in english.--85.16.179.178 16:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Steve Brill is now most well-known for his post-production involvement in the making of  Fanboys, and the consequent controversy. I have added a paragraph mentioning this in as NPOV as I could. Centrepull (talk) 08:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Fanboys_(2009_film)#Development| Fanboys]] controversy
Talk:Rot-Weiß Essen

message: The spelling "Weiss" makes the article accessible to English language users - the symbol ß is not readily available on the English keyboard. A re-direct exists and I may switch the two pages around to reflect the correct German usage. P.S. Your note belongs on the article talk page, not as a trivia item in the article. Thanks. Wiggy! 15:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, it's switched around. Wiggy! 16:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused.  On 19 Feb 07, you redirected to FC Rot-Weiss Essen and then on 8 Mar 07, you switched it so the default for the English language wiki uses the German language spelling.  That doesn't make any sense.  Also, shouldn't de:Rot-Weiss Essen be de:Rot-Weiß Essen?  Nevermind, this should clear up both issues.  The German language wiki on the page explains this issue (follow either of the "de" links and read if you know German).  Basically, the correct way to write "white" in German is "weiß", but the team's name is registered officially as Rot-Weiss Essen and, as such, the German language wiki redirects Rot-Weiß Essen to Rot-Weiss Essen (and so should we).--Littleman_TAMU (talk) 23:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weiss vs. Weiß
Talk:Trancemaster

message: If anyone knows the naming scheme of the albums (5007,5008,6001,6002, etc.) it would be nice to know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devon Fyson (talk • contribs) 08:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they just stick two zeros in the middle, so 5007 is just number 57 etc. Vadmium (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming Convention
Talk:Teechers

message: Talk, debate. Please be bold and inserty stuff in after checking this page, don't wait for someone else. Larklight 16:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose so, but that is very picky, and no-one canm realy tell he's called Mr Harrison (it's only mentioned once) Nevertheless, I'll change it.Larklight 16:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: : David Gerard, why was the warning obselete? Larklight 15:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There have been lots of discussions - it was decided that the spoiler warning isn't need on articles anymore (I think) -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 19:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Realy? Why was that, I always liked the idea. Don't bother to type out the explaination here, just give me a link to a page with the reasoning. Certainly, I've been saved by a spoiler warning once. Larklight 16:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler Warning
Talk:Turtle Soup

message: Everyone listen to the song Lady-O. It is so beautiful! --69.67.230.236 21:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Can someone describe the history behind the bonus tracks?  Were they released on 45, and not available on the original album? 198.177.27.28 (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History behind the bonus tracks
Talk:Miami Marine Stadium

message: This article appears to have been taken en bloc from this site; can someone poke that site's creator to find out if he copied that text here, or else rewrite this article?  Jouster  (whisper) 16:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article could use a picture or two. I added a photoreq template, and found this  on flickr which I think can be uploaded. DVD 01:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: If anyone has any information on the Revitalization of this Stadium, that needs to be added to the respective section. That contains information about a future event in 2016, three years ago. Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 05:11, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't look like much is happening. The Friends of Miami Marine Stadium have not posted any news in 4 1/2 years.September 2014 update The City of Miami approved a bond issue for restoring the stadium in 2016, and it was added to the National Register of Historic Places a year ago Updates, but I haven't found anything about restoration starting, or even scheduled to start. - Donald Albury 15:21, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Talk:Under the Town

message: I've added refs to provide claim of notability: the album was nominated for an ARIA Music Award in 2006. The article definitely needs more work but it should not be deleted.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute PROD
Talk:Uneasy Listening Vol. 1

message: DJ Z-Trip released albums known as Uneasy Listening Vol. 1 and Vol. 2 back in 1999 and 2000 respectively.  The earlier release should take this article's location with this HIM article going to Uneasy Listening (HIM album). 22:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Albums do not appear to be as individually notable as to warrant having their own articles. However, being that they're two entries in the same series may make a case for one article covering both albums, with a note that they were eventually released together (with that combined release not needing its own article at all). LazyBastardGuy 17:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Uneasy Listening Vol. 2]]
Talk:Unstoppable (Girl Talk album)

message: According to allmusic.com, Unstoppable was released in 2006, the same year as Night Ripper. I believe the date on this article (2004) is incorrect. TWCarlson (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album release date 

message: I think that an SWV track was used around 0:30 on track 5 but I'm not sure which one.
JokerWylde (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample Discussion
Talk:Uranus (EP)

message: The titles of the shellac singles
* The Rude Gesture: A Pictorial History
* Uranus
* The Bird is the Most Popular Finger
make it completely clear that they all refer to vulgarities, and that "Uranus" is to be pronounced "your anus" rather than the alternative "yoor-uh-nus". But that's OR, so it can't go in the article. Thnidu (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles
Talk:Donegal Bay

message: Wondering what names can be given to headlands either side of the bay. Laurel Bush 16:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of headlands 
Talk:Utah Saints (album)

message: The list of samples is a bit pointless. This album contains literally hundreds of samples. The sleeve notes state that it contains nothing but samples (though this claim is unlikely to be true). --Ef80 (talk) 21:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remember rightly the credits on the sleeve/booklet specifically state the samples that have been mentioned in this article. I'd say that they're the most notable samples used. I'm not exactly an expert on these things but some of the hundreds of other samples on the album are probably their own samples of sounds, noises and stuff. Maybe the heading should be 'Notable samples' rather than just 'Samples'. --Geach (talk) 21:51, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samples
Talk:Cutthroat (pool)

message: I've added rules on how to play a match, however these are not official rules as I believe none exist. They are very useful though to anyone looking to play matches rather than just counting who has won the most games. --
:That sounds very, very much like made up stuff and original research, which are forbidden in Wikipedia articles.  Do you have any third-party sources for this match points system?  If not, it will be deleted.  It may be much more appropriate for some other sort of site, like BilliardForum, etc. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 20:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Continued Play Added

message: I'm not sure if it's only a local thing ( I live in Central Florida ), but I've played cutthroat games where five people each defend their own set of three balls, with all the same rules. Anyone mind if I add this? -(noob)
:Yes. It needs to be sourced. Even the main article isn't sourced yet, and adding more WP:IKNOWIT stuff to it without sources is likely to get the entire article deleted.  Instead of adding local curiosities, please instead look for reliable sources for the basic material. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 20:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 5-player variant

message: WHAT IF TWO PLAYERS REMAIN, THEY EACH HAVE ONE BALL LEFT ON THE TABLE.THE ONE PLAYER MAKES THE OPPONENTS BALL, BUT SCRATCHES.
HE LOSES HIS TURN AND THE OPPONENT WINS THE GAME AS HIS BALL WILL BE PLACED BACK ON THE TABLE. IS THIS CORRECT ? 67.142.161.32 (talk) 19:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Determining the winner in cutthroat
Talk:Fight Club/Archive 2

message: Someone remove this category recently. So far only one person has disputed this category, while this has been up for some time now. Personally, I can't think of a better movie to represent this category, despite the fact that the authors themselves define this movie in such away, namely during the movie's commentary, on the dvd version. The argument of the article not reflecting that view has got nothing to do with the movie genre itself. If the article can't express something that is factual concerning the definition of the movie, than it is the article that must be changed.Maziotis 14:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a lot of unreferenced, unencyclopedic information up for some time, but that doesn't qualify for it to be kept.  If the directors define this film specifically as anti-modernist, then please include that information somewhere in the article with a citation.  Otherwise, the unreferenced categorization does not reflect any claim currently made in the article. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 15:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I mean that the article should cover the themes of the film so the categories can reflect that.  The category in question is more in-depth than an English-language film category, and there should be something in the article that details that with citation.  That's why I also removed the Cult film category -- there's nothing in the article that defines it as a cult film.  Hope that makes sense. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 19:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: That seems like something to address with the category iself.  I'm only letting the category stay because I don't disagree that Fight Club is an anti-modernist (or anti-consumerist) film.  I plan to find citation that will reflect its anti-corporate nature. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 16:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  fight club is not an anti-modernist film?!
Talk:Military Order of Aviz

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No move  UtherSRG (talk) 01:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Military Order of Aviz →  – twice moved since 2021 without discussion Srnec (talk) 01:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 September 2022
Category talk:Web software

message: Is this category a duplicate to :Category:Web applications? John Seward 17:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I had a look, I dont think so, but you can confirm.  We applications look like they are ASP applications or have a web interface correct?  The types of applications I am speaking of, are pc based applications that talk to an internet host appliaction that respond back with an anwer but the actually application runs on the pc not the Internet.  --akc9000 (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 15:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Vital Signs (Survivor album)

message: not clear on reason, if it charted at No.8 would appear to pass NSONG. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:20, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Blanking
Talk:Volume 3: A Child's Guide to Good and Evil

message: I see that one of tracks was co-written with Terry Kath, presumably shortly before he formed Chicago (or at the time he was putting that band together).  This seems sufficiently notable to be mentioned in the text.  Do we have any other information on his involvement, other than the album credit?   Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terry Kath
Talk:Amateur Sports Act of 1978

message: For more dirt see also http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/06513919689/us-olympic-committee-forces-30-year-old-philidelphia-gyro-restaraunt-to-change-its-name.shtml.84.226.135.178 (talk) 22:41, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marmaduke Constable

message: I took this down. 
:His sister Janet Constable married Randell Etherington (died 29 October 1520), son of William Etherington and Alice Skerne. They were the ancestors of Amanda Staveley, an entrepreneur who was once engaged to Prince Andrew, Duke of Yorkhttp://www.wargs.com/noble/staveley.html. Source [1]: 
The source is not accurate. It even states at the top of the page The following material on the immediate ancestry of Amanda Staveley should not be considered either exhaustive or authoritative, but rather as a first draft. 
Also, there is no listing of this person anywhere else in the sources I have looked at:
* Richardson, William & Everinham, Kimball G. Plantagenet ancestry: a study in colonial and medieval families (2004), pg 225.
* Constable, Stirnet.com
Lady Meg (talk) 22:31, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using Public Trees with No Sources 

message: Do we need all of this? It's rather confusing and does not fit with the general ancestry tree. If you're going to do a tree -- just put the person, that's it. You don't need to go all the way back to his 10th great-grandfather. If you really need to explain all this put it in a section, not on the tree. Also, you don't need to put the link to a source in the box with the person. The link will show in the references section if it's done properly. -- Lady Meg (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry Tree
Talk:Sponge (disambiguation)

message: Umm... I think this disambiguation page is broken. And I'm not sure how to make a new page for that "Sponge (entertainer)." Someone come fix it? NerwenGreen 07:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted this page back to a disambiguation, and requested that it be moved back to its proper location. This will preserve the edit history of the disambiguation page. I also copied over the entertainer's page to a new page Sponge (entertainer).  Ewlyahoocom 15:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wanted! The Outlaws

message: Outlaws was not the first country music album to sell 
a million copies. It was the first country album to be 
certified platinum by the RIAA. Tennessee Ernie Ford, 
Glen Campbell, Johnny Cash and Tammy Wynette (among others) 
all had albums sell a million copies prior to the release of
Outlaws, though their albums would be certified as 
platinum after Outlaws.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.119.232.241 (talk) 19:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Rehab (band)

message: t was written for a high school newspaper. Some of the information needs citing, and who is this Danny Boone character that just pops up in the middle of the Early Years? -- Hukt own fonikz 17:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: At the end of the Rebirth section, it hints as if the original members of Rehab were making another album. Cite sources? I've found nothing that says they are working on another album.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.158.197.66 (talk) 08:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back Together? 

message: Was done by me, didn't realize I wasn't logged in and forgot to leave a comment.  "Southern Discomfort" went to the wrong album, by the same name but a different band. 
Danielkitchener1 (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit at 09:42, 9 June 2008 by 66.32.121.84

message: It’s their latest studio album, which they released last year. Is there a specific reason for this, or was it just overlooked? AEWisJericho (talk) 02:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn’t Sand Castles in their discography?
Talk:1890 British Ultimatum

message: The comment of 23 September 2016 by contributor Empmmus about the Ultimatum:
“This was essentially considered as a stab in the back, revealing Britain's true colours of utilising the so called "longest alliance" with Portugal for its own self interests when necessary (i.e. requesting Portuguese participation in World War I), whilst completely disregarding said alliance when it suited Britain.”
This is not supported by any source, and appears to be the contributor’s opinion. It is also out of place here, as properly-sourced details of the Portuguese reaction to the Ultimatum are covered in the following section, Aftermath. 
Sscoulsdon (talk) 08:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, fine. That is the sort of thing that would definitely require a source. Herostratus (talk) 10:00, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-neutral comments
Talk:Aquae Flaviae

message: В Шавеше планировали строительство подземной парковки, поэтому сделали предварительные археологические изыскания. И вдруг обнаружили римские термы с действующим термальным источником. Все это произошло в 2006 году, но только в 2022 году здесь смогли открыть музей-термы, 79.164.46.79 (talk) 17:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  устаревшая информация
Talk:Compass (1986 TV program)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support even though I'd support also double-disambiguation if that was presented as an option. --Gonnym (talk) 08:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll be creating "double-disambiguation" redirects if this passes, as well... But it's not necessary in this case for the articles themselves: 1965 vs. 1986 is sufficient (as per WP:CONCISE). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:35, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Dominion Bridge Company

message: Didn't Groupe ADF get a contract to built the antenna of the new WTC in New York ?173.176.120.156 (talk) 13:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Trade Center antenna 
Talk:Port Lympne Wild Animal Park

message: I've saved the infobox instead of seeing if it was alright first and it looks horrible. I dont no how to do the infobox probably so could someone just make it for me instead thanks.Ae12079410 17:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: There have been a number of deaths in connection with Port Lympne Zoo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.4.21 (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fatal 

message: Robin Birley was injured by a tiger.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.109.117 (talk) 18:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A girl's hand was injured by a tiger in a separate incident.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.65.2.139 (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Injury
Talk:CBC Newsroom

message: Does anybody have a source, for pointing out that Wilson continues to mispronouce Barack's name? It's prenounced Barock, not Barack. GoodDay (talk) 20:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barack Obama 

message: Hello
Per a discussion between 331 dot and myself, I have decided to remove all the rolls of the anchors on this article until a reliable source confirming their rolls can be found.  Please do not restore until you hav esourced all of them.
thanks.
199.101.62.30 (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anchor Rolls
Talk:Lock ring

message: This page is redirected to from 'lockring' then says "For the washer, see lockring". Which redirects back to here. Somewhat circular, no? Has there been, at any point, a page dedicated to 'lockring' in the usual sense (which is to say, a ring that locks something in a mechanical or engineering setting), and if so why has it been shunted in favor of an obscure archaeological stub? Anyone? Oh, and the 'washer' page does not disambiguate to anything approaching a lockring either.
(Just so's you know, I got here following a the link from Bicycle_brake_systems).
212.50.184.130 17:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)