lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ryde School with Upper Chine

message: This article definitely needs more references, as it currently has none. Editor5807speak 18:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial

message: This article is currently named 'Ryde School', with 'Ryde School with Upper Chine' as a redirect. Since Ryde School with Upper Chine is the school's full name, personally I think it would be better to have this as the name of the article, and keep Ryde School as a redirect. It would be good to hear other peoples views on this. Editor5807speak 18:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, no one has mentioned any objections, so I have taken some action and moved the article to 'Ryde School with Upper Chine', maintaining 'Ryde School' as a re-direct. Editor5807speak 18:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed page move

message: The sections on planning applications appear to be using the page as a free campaign site. Fæ (talk) 09:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:Davor Dominiković

message: I have taken some pictures at a Handball Bundesliga match. However, I don't know where to put the picture in the wikicode, could anyone with respective knowledge do this?
Thanks!
--Mad melone (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons 
Talk:Santa Cruz Mountain Wineries

message: This is simply a duplication of information already in Santa Cruz Mountains AVA, except for the list. I intend on redirecting it to there and adding the list to that article, unless there are objections. - Merzbow (talk) 18:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This article should have probably been moved to that location as a basis when Santa Cruz Mountains AVA was created, but apparently the author thought otherwise. Toddst1 (talk) 21:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of Microsoft Visual Studio Add-ins

message: If you choose to add comments to this page, please do so in a separate section below.  Do not break-up my comments here.
== Raw count analysis ==
* Keep
# The Transhumanist
# Iamunknown 
# Rhymed/24.18.202.245
* Delete
# Hu12 <nominator>
# Pavel Vozenilek
# Soumyasch
* Non-participatory
# SineBot - just doing that sinebot thing
# Ultraexactzz - delsort
== Rough consensus rationale ==
=== Delete arguments ===
none
=== Discounted delete arguments ===
* Article fails WP:NOT#REPOSITORY
** THis policy has 4 tenets, none of which apply to this AfD.  The policy itself says to refer to Wikipedia:Lists#List naming and list contents instead.
* Article fails WP:NOT#DIRECTORY
** THis policy has 5 tenets, none of which apply to this AfD.
* Article is WP:SPAM.
** This guideline defines spam as solicitations for a business, product or service, or are public relations pieces designed to promote a company or individual, which does not apply here.
* has reached an unsalvage-able state
** The edit button has been verified to still work on this article
* Not very informative
** Wikipedia:Lists says: Information The list may be a valuable information source. This is particularly the case for a structured list. Examples would include lists organized chronologically, grouped by theme, or annotated lists. 
* hard to maintain due to volatility of the topic.
** we have millions of editors available to help with that
=== Keep arguments ===
* Flawed deletion rationale of nominator
* notability and spam links can be managed by editors
* useful navigation tool
* several sources available/ work in progress
* of interest to readers, provides additional context
* list of topics that are related in a significant way
=== Discounted keep arguments ===
* The world needs this list; information is hard to find elsewhere
== Summary ==
Although the !vote appears to be split, there were no valid delete arguments made in this flawed nomination, or in the delete !votes that were made.  The keep arguments were backed solidly by policy and precedent. Ergo: Keep. JERRY talk contribs 02:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing administrator's remarks 

message: Although the !vote appears to be split, there were no valid delete arguments made in this flawed nomination, or in the delete !votes that were made.  The keep arguments were backed solidly by policy and precedent. Ergo: Keep. JERRY talk contribs 02:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary
Talk:1948 Lake Mead Boeing B-29 crash

message: This has a bit of a conspiracy-theory tone.  I've removed the non:RS link, and added a couple tags.  The "solar variance" angle sounds a bit dodgy; I heard the bomber was simple testing a missile prototype.  Fell Gleaming(talk) 23:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: More details about the “sun tracker” test and its intended weapon system deployment, is here (starting page ten).http://www.divetheb29.com/B29/documents/whyB29copy2.pdf--Aspro (talk) 13:15, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: The wreck was apparently located sometime in 2002? http://www.8newsnow.com/story/1371390/federal-judge-to-decide-who-keeps-b-29-find http://www.seatrepid.com/files/LAMEAAReview11-02-V3.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmaccabe (talk • contribs) 06:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Located 

message: As I read the story, the plane hit the surface of Lake Meade, destroying the engines.  Thus the plane settled on the lake surface.  At that point, the crew wouldn't "bail out" (i.e.: use parachutes), but rather simply evacuated the plane.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terry Thorgaard (talk • contribs) 19:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crew "bailed out"? 
Talk:Michael Grimes (investment banker)

message: The bio part is too light on citations, I'll fix that.
DominicConnor (talk) 14:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Please let me know why the article was tagged for speedy deletion! I believe I've followed all instructions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aanandk (talk • contribs) 
:I have no idea why it was tagged, unless it was very short when that was done. I've removed the speedy-delete tag, as it is obviously not warranted. (Coming from me, a confirmed deletionist, that's saying something.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S.: You do nead to convert your source citations to the standard format, though. See WP:REF. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, just like that. Good job! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 08:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged 
Talk:375 Pearl Street

message: I removed the following:
:Most of the lower floors contain the Bergtraum High School for Business Careers of the New York City Department of Education. Some of the lower floors, and all of the middle and upper floors, house various adminsitrative functions including Switching Control Center Systems. A small DMS-100 exchange serves the administrative offices, but the buliding is not a wire center or telephone exchange serving public customers.
The Bergtraum website and the wiki article make no mention of this building.  The high school (which is a modern brown structure) adjoins the white 375 building.  The switching comment specifically came from the NY Times article. Americasroof (talk) 02:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced claims

message: This was just on Slashdot:
http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/it-infrastructure/worlds-largest-high-rise-data-center-ope/240151399
"Yesterday, Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced the opening a 1 million square foot high-rise data center the an old Verizon switching building at 375 Pearl Street. Sabey Data Center Properties, the owner of the property, has named the data center Intergate.Manhattan"
08af9a09 (talk) 22:54, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's open 

message: I don't think the addition of "Most recently, a prestigious Manhattan real estate management firm, Matthew Adam Properties, Inc., committed to a substantial upgrade by leasing a portion of the 14th floor beginning in January, 2018 in an effort to better serve their clients." is appropriate because it has peacock terms and doesn't really relate to the building. -- Dolotta (talk) 03:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  69.202.217.131 - Please Discuss Your Addition Here 

message: in the early 2000's verizon operated a nortel communications server 2000 class 5 switch, the Pearl Street CS2K switch CLLI (NYCMNYPSPS0) that was the recipient of traffic from other decommissioned DMS-100 switches in the city. The evidence from this comes directly from an announcement provided by verizon to its wholesale customers who needed the information to change routing etc. https://www22.verizon.com/wholesale/attachments/notifications/latest_il13-0263.pdf An appropriate addition can be under the 2000s section discussing this. Teglin333 (talk) 14:18, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   Pearl Street CS2K Switch
Talk:Morelli M-100

message: Added a photo, but keeping Imageneeded to encourage replacement with an image of the whole aircraft. Lestocq (talk) 15:02, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/PPVs

message: I don't know but I like the older version of the format better, because I was able to sort it. Now I am unable to do that, is there a way we can add that?--TrUCo9311 02:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we have to take a vote on this? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean we don't have to, Im just wondering whether we can get it to be sortable again..--TrUCo9311 02:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ask Chron, he was the one that fixed up the list. I personally think it looks good, but that's just my opinion. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Well, if you think it looks good like this then it should remain.TrUCo9311 03:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Format

message: How about we add statistics, like in WP:PW/STUB? --13 of Diamonds (talk) 06:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics 

message: The Vengeance 2002 that I started in my sandbox has been finished but I don't know how to change it any help? Thanks Adster95 (talk) 12:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a link to your sandbox and I will review it to see if it's improved from the original article.--S</font>RX</font> 14:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Seeing a quick glance, the article needs to be taken out more into Out-Of-Universe. Plus it needs to be in past tense and less details per WP:PLOT.--S</font>RX</font> 14:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vengeance 2002
Category talk:Soviet and Russian military reconnaissance aircraft

message: I don't think the TU-204 should be classed as a recon plane. It's an airliner. That's like sending a Southwest 737 or a United 777 to spy on something. No antiradar measures, no kind of stealth at all. Maybe it's hiding in plain (or plane) sight, but I doubt it. 2601:646:9501:CDC0:6401:C676:F9EB:43AE (talk) 23:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:DeKalb County, Georgia

message: I created a link to my new article on the Buford Highway Corridor (i.e. Buford Hwy as a *place* and *community*, not just a road) under unincorporated places. If someone can find a new category for it, you are welcome to try. It is most certainly a place of importance in DeKalb and belongs here, but you can really discuss what category of "place" Buford Highway is.Keizers (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it a city?  Is it a town?  Is it a census-designated place?  Is it an unincorporated community (a populated place)?  Is it a ghost town?  If the answer to all of these is no, then it doesn't belong here.  Nyttend (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Sorry but where is it decided which categories of place can be listed here? Buford Highway (Corridor) is a community that is located partially in unincorporated DeKalb and partially within the city limits of Chamblee and Doraville. I don't understand why only communities that are entirely unincorporated can be listed here. I see that edge cities are also not listed here (e.g. Perimeter Edge City). To me, this is excluding two fundamentally important communities in the county based on political borders.Keizers (talk) 23:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please observe the title of the template: it's municipalities and communities, not things like this.  Political borders are what the reliable sources use, so we must go by them.  Nyttend (talk) 15:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is how are you defining community? The only official political unit to define an unincorporated area is the census-designated place (CDP) otherwise it's just a general consensus that this is a "place". If you are going to take only CDPs then you have to throw away Brookhaven from this list, because it is not a CDP. In this sense Buford Highway Corridor in unincorporated DeKalb is most definitely community - it is the area on either side of the highway with many apartment complexes and tens of thousands of residents and which does not belong to any other community (except North Atlanta CDP). 
Second, edge cities are also communities - many reliable academic sources would discuss them. They are a reality in a modern metropolitan area as a type of community/place. We should not be keeping to conventions from the encyclopedias of the 1970s.Keizers (talk) 19:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Buford Highway Corridor
Talk:Cameron Island

message: I was the cook/medic at the final cleanup for the Cameron island site...in the summer of 2008! The project was handled by Matrix aviation solutions, if you are looking for records.
Not sure why anybody would say that it was completed 9 years prior, but that citation that they used NEVER MENTIONED Cameron island in 1999. 2001:56A:F8F0:3200:9839:A105:A5F8:24ED (talk) 02:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up date/citation are incorrect
Talk:Byam Martin Island

message: This article should specify in the title that it is in Canada. There is also a moderately large island in north Western Australia of the same name that may one day merit its own entry... Ptilinopus (talk) 10:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's necessary some time then this should go to Byam Martin Island (Nunavut) and Byam Martin Island would become a disambiguation. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 13:32, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More specificity needed
Talk:Prescott Island

message: the coordinates listed were wrong, it was showing up in the middle of Greenland. i don't know the correct location so i left it blank.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Someones life (talk • contribs) 02:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  coordinates 
Talk:Charlton Island

message: Why is the ethnicity Inuit if the population is zero? Is there some sort of influence from residents of Nunavut, or is that simply a default input for a description that ought to be removed? Andrei Iosifovich (talk) 18:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you scroll to the bottom of this page and then check with Google Earth there are at least three named islands to the south of Charlton. The most southerly one seems to be Stag Island. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 04:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. This says Charlton is the most southerly point but at  from the Atlas of Canada #4 is further south. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 04:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Allco Finance Group

message: Aldwinteo - it is not vandalism if it is factually correct.  Before reverting how about you do some original research on the current state of this company.  If you want to improve my text then by all means do so - just deleting it indicates you are a stooge of the company.
In your improving, you may want to cover why the directors refused to sign off on the accounts for ... how many weeks?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.236.242.248 (talk) 07:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a member of WP:FACT & a RC Patroller in Wikipedia. I reverted as per my reply here. Kindly note in order to avoid any unnecessary disputes and frustration later. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 09:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Hi there - I think we should talk about my recent edits, which have just been reverted without comment (that's cool - I probably should have made a comment here as well!) - I'm not that bothered by 'fully integrated', but I do stand by the assertion that it doesn't actually communicate much of meaning to our readers..... but I must insist that David Coe at least is removed per the ref I left (I'll drop it here in a mo...) - and I also think that the 'current event' moniker is probably worthwhile at this stage... thoughts? Privatemusings (talk) 00:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Coe, Fully integrated, and current event.....
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/St Margaret's College, Otago

message: If you choose to add comments to this page, please do so in a separate section below.  Do not break-up my comments here.
== Raw count analysis ==
* Keep
# Grutness (6 edits)
# Limegreen 
# Domster
# Hobit (4 edits)
# Coccyx Bloccyx 
# Bduke (3 edits)
* Delete
# Jayron32 (4 edits) <nominator>
# TerriersFan 
# DGG 
# Guldenat 
# Nick Dowling
# Dhartung (2 edits)
* Non-participatory
# SineBot - just doing that sinebot thing
# KrakatoaKatie - relisting
# Jerry - relisting
# Ultraexactzz - delsort
# Bduke - delsort
== Rough consensus rationale ==
=== Delete arguments ===
* subject has no independent notability from the larger organization with which it is associated
* lacks multiple, independent, reliable sources
* precedent: in the regional variation of english of this subject, the term College means residence hall.  Such subjects have proven over time to be generally non-notable.
* cited sources only verify existence and do not provide encyclopedic context
=== Keep arguments ===
* subject is unique (first women's hall of residence anywhere in Oceania)
* source provided for notability
** source was contested as not independent of the subject, but a plausible rationale for independence was provided
* precedent: many articles on this subject group, few have been AfD'd; most of those were kept; this suggests that sources are probably available. Article needs time to be expanded before this can be determined.
* article asserts notability
=== Discounted keep arguments ===
* WP:OSE
* has an alumni society and had a rather large reunion
== Summary ==
I was actually preparing this analysis as my usual extended closing remarks that I do for close-calls or other AfD's where I think there is a liklihood of a deletion review.  But another administrator closed the debate before I was done. (This takes me an hour or more to do!)  So I decided to put it up a anyway, for whomever is interested.  I Endorse no consensus closure JERRY talk contribs 03:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent analysis of closing 

message: I was actually preparing this analysis as my usual extended closing remarks that I do for close-calls or other AfD's where I think there is a liklihood of a deletion review.  But another administrator closed the debate before I was done. (This takes me an hour or more to do!)  So I decided to put it up a anyway, for whomever is interested.  I Endorse no consensus closure JERRY talk contribs 03:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary
Talk:Resolution Island (Nunavut)

message: How serious is the pollution at this site? I can't imagine that low level PCB leakage is a truly significant ecological issue and yet it consumes about half of the total information on Resolution Island. Would prefer to see information on the flora and fauna inhabiting the island that I imagine have somehow managed to survive the American's profligate desecration of the land.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.104.160.37 (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Atlanta University Center

message: The new website (as of 7/29/08) lists only Morehouse, the School of Medicine, Spelman, and Clark Atlanta as member institutions.  I've listed the Interdenominational Theological Center as "defunct" in light of this, but I'm questioning why the sudden change.  If someone finds a credible source regarding this, please change the main article and this template if necessary. D4S (talk) 07:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITC debate
Talk:Mansel Island

message: This is also known as Mansfield Island in older literature.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 14:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mansfield Island 
Talk:Beechey Island

message: The name of Beechey Island is from William Beechey, not from his brother. 
See the Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online. Bye bye. Alma  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.5.129.157 (talk) 16:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The name

message: Satellite shots of Beechey Island, like this one, suggest that it is nowadays joined to Devon Island by a tombolo. Should this be mentioned in the article? Kelisi (talk) 04:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  >>>Tombolo
Talk:Port Leopold, Prince Leopold Island and Elwin Bay

message: This article is confusing to me, so perhaps it confusing to others as well.  It covers 3 topics: a Somerset Island abandoned trading post, an island near Somerset Island, and a Somerset Island bay. I haven't seen this type of clustering in other Nunavut articles.  Here are my recommendations:
# Split Prince Leopold Island into its own article. Add island infobox. Using Mapping, linky to each other.
# Split Elwin Bay into its own article. Add bay infobox. Using Mapping, linky to each other.
# Currently, "Port Leopold" redirects here. To retain history, switch so that "Port Leopold, Prince Leopold Island and Elwin Bay" redirects to "Port Leopold", an article about an abandoned trading post (such as Tavani). 
If implemented, these changes would correlate with the treatment of other Nunavut abandoned trading posts, islands, and bays. Is there any support, opposition, comment, etc. to these recommendations? --Rosiestep (talk) 18:45, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 22:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommendation to split
Talk:List of political parties in Zambia

message: political parties 102.150.44.86 (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  civic 
Talk:Nicolas Stemann

message: I am restoring the notability tag. Per WP:Notability:
A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
* "Presumed" means objective evidence meets the criterion, without regard for the subjective personal judgments of editors. Substantive coverage in reliable sources suggests that the subject is notable. 
* "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive.
and
Notability requires objective evidence:
The common theme in the notability guidelines is the requirement for verifiable objective evidence to support a claim of notability.
Please also read Wikipedia:Notability (people). Notability requires verifiable references from reliable sources. Currently, the article has no references at all, so it is impossible to verify notability.
Stemann may indeed be notable. If he is then it should be easy to provide references. Sbowers3 (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Ndola

message: Third largest city in Zambia? However, List of cities and towns in Zambia lists it as second largest at least from year 1980. 82.141.94.91 (talk) 16:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments