lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:European Union enlargement.gif

message: I think Algeria should not be included since this was only a colony of France and not an integral part, right? Plus maybe for better viewing, the countries should be faded in upon their ascension to the Union instead of them just popping up. Can anybody do this (I'm not an expert with creating these animations).
00:36, 9 Mai 2009 (UTC)
:Algeria was not a mere colony, it was part of France proper.theBOBbobato (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Correctness

message: New country! Kosovo! time to revise the map again! 204.52.215.107 (talk) 23:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. What shal we do with Kosovo? --Dima1 (talk) 20:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 'New countries' aren't 'synchronised' on this map until the next accession (e.g. Slovakia and the Czech Republic). I.e. Kosovo will appear when Croatia and/or Iceland acceede. - SSJ ☎ 22:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Actuality

message: the images change too quickly to take it all in, should be slowed down  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.80.253.5 (talk) 23:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. --Evilhairyhamster (talk) 00:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read this. - SSJ ☎ 22:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speed

message: This map is wrong as it does not show Greenland's EU joining in 1973 and leaving in 1985. --Dima1 (talk) 18:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greenland 

message: Two ways the map is incorrect:
(1) the "final" map does not reflect the European Union's view of Europe's political geography. Why? Because the European Union has never agreed that Kosovo is a separate country to Serbia. The map ignores this showing Kosovo in exactly the same way as each other non-member state. . In case any one thinks I am being pernickity, just check out the official map of the of the European Uhion here  from the Europa website. Kosovo is shown on the map as part of Serbia. I do not wish to get bogged down in the politics or nuances of all of this. The simple fact is that the EU's own official map appears not to show Kosovo separately. It is also notable that Kosovo is always referred to in official EU documents as under the relevant UNSCR (under which it is under UN interim administration).
(2) the "final" map, as I understand it, is intended to reflect the map as at the date of the most recent enlargement - that was in 2007 (i.e. before Kosovo even unilaterally declared independence). I am not saying that it would be correct to include Kosovo at this point even if it had decleared independence before 2007 (see point 1 above) but here it is plain wrong as no one regarded Kosovo as a country separate to Serbia in 2007 (not even the Kosovo Albanians themseleves, as they had not made their UDI at that point). 86.45.54.230 (talk) 00:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correctness - Kosovo 

message: As of today, Croatia is a new member; thus, there should be an additional section for 2013, indicating its inclusion in the map.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.75.82.202 (talk) 00:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Croatia
Talk:Sir John Williams, 1st Baronet, of the City of London

message: This page needs moved to Sir John Williams, 1st Baronet --Counter-revolutionary 22:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not so. There are redlinks at Williams Baronets for Sir John Williams, 1st Baronet, of Minster and Sir John Williams, 1st Baronet, of Bodelwyddan. I'm not sure either is provably notable, however. Choess 14:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there could well be more hiding in the woodwork.  John Williams is a particularly common name in Wales! Deb 16:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: of the city of London just sounds silly.  --Counter-revolutionary 16:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As opposed to all the other silly-sounding peerage titles? Deb 12:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You misunderstand.  This is not only silly, but incorrect.  It isn't a peerage title either. --Counter-revolutionary 13:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So what should it be in order to preserve disambiguation? Deb 21:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a list of Sir John Williams, 1st Baronet with ref. to the of the City of London in the disambiguation page. --Counter-revolutionary 21:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

text: But we've already got that. Deb 21:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see the problem! More than one page can't be called...I suppose this shall have to do. --Counter-revolutionary 21:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would Sir John Williams, 1st Baronet Williams of the City of London be any better, do you think? Deb 21:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably, in terms of accuracy, yes. --Counter-revolutionary 02:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, I checked the conventions and it looks like we're in the clear to move it. Deb 12:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to Sir John Williams, 1st Baronet, of the City of London. "Baronet Williams" was incorrect; the surname does not form part of the baronetal title. Opera hat (talk) 08:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Animal psychopathology

message: Bearian (talk) 15:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

message: I think Animal Psychopathology is a misnomer. What is meant here is "animal models of human neuropsychiatric disorders". Something that is pathologic in a human being may be rather normal in an animal, although that does not exclude that this animal might be a good model for some human condition. As it stands now, I am not sure that this article is useful. If it is to be about animal models, than a more complete enumeration would be warranted. --Crusio 22:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, while these disorders are similar to human disorders, they are separate conditions in their own right. Animal psychology is its own subject of study, not necessarily in the context of modeling human abnormalities. --Iamozy (talk) 20:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: "Being apathetic can have a fitness advantage for the organism." - this is probably the weirdest thing I've read on Wikipedia. Apathy is no hibernation. This should be explained or have at least have a reference. --78.54.8.22 (talk) 08:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apathy 

message: This article has numerous problems with examples in incorrect sections (e.g. why discuss rats and beetles in Thin Sow Syndrome?)  The section on eating disorders starts with "Animals in the wild appear to be relatively free from eating disorders although their body composition fluctuates depending on seasonal and reproductive cycles. However, domesticated animals including farm, laboratory and pet animals are prone to disorders. Evolutionary fitness drives feeding behavior in wild animals. The expectation is that farm animals also display this behavior, but questions arise if the same principles apply to laboratory and pet animals."  This does not make sense in so many ways...what is the relevance of body composition?  Do only domesticated animals show eating disorders - what about zoo animals?  Does fitness have nothing to do with feeding behaviour in non-wild animals?  Which questions "arise"?  I suggest this article needs a thorough re-write.__DrChrissy (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of article 

message: Zoochosis redirects to this article, but isn’t mentioned at all. ZFT (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless redirect
Talk:Chinese Communist Party Committee Secretary

message: Why this article with the name Party chief only talks about China? The English phrase party chief can refer to the chief of any party, not only for Communist Party of China. It's quite different from the Chinese phrase dangwei shuji (党委书记). A dictionary says that Party chief means the ultimate leader of a survey crew. A news report says Huber Elected as German Coalition Party Chief. If this article is exclusively about the CPC, then it should be renamed. --Neo-Jay 22:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What if we moved it to say, "Party secretary"? Colipon+(T) 06:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not something like CPC Party secretary, which clearly refers to the Communist Party of China? I think many political parties, such as the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, also have secretaries. Party secretary and Party leader have already existed to provide general information. Party chief should be renamed to reflect its CPC focus, and then be changed to redirecting to Party leader. --Neo-Jay 12:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only concern then, is that all the links to party chief from CPC-related articles will be broken. Is there a way to fix this? --Colipon+(T) 23:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the incoming links. There are less than 20 pages linked here. Not so many. It can be fixed manually. And you can also put CPC party secretary in Party leader as a link. Then people can find the CPC article. --Neo-Jay 03:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Only for China??
Category talk:Sugar substitutes

message: This category should be split into the sugar-based sweeteners (honey could go there) and the non-sugar sweeteners, such as
aspartame, saccharin or xylitol. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I've never seen this category before until it was just added to the honey article. That made m come here to find out why, because honey is a sugar, not a substitute. Actually, it's two sugars and some sugar compounds, like dextrin, with some other additives, but I think it's highly disingenuous to list all of these as sugar substitutes. When I hear "substitute" I'm thinking of a low-energy chemical that provides a sweet taste, like saccharin, phenolketoneurics, or aconitum. Corn syrup, agave, and so-on are all various forms of sugar, and thus are not substitutes. Either this category should be divided, or it should be renamed: Sucrose substitutes. (Wait, that doesn't work either, as some of these are sucrose based.) Zaereth (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Calling this category "Sugar substitute" is silly not only for chemical reasons, but for historic ones as well; refined sugar was a rare luxury as it required both semi-industrialized processing and large labor forces  and global trade for it to become widely available and become the primary means of sweetening things. It may as well be called "Honey substitutes" based on historic reasons. It appears that this category was previously named "Sweeteners" and that appears to be the more correct name for this category, why was it changed to this?Falconjh (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I can agree to that. As a list of all sweeteners it makes sense, but a category of substitutes should list things that don't contain sugar as its primary ingredient or sweetening agent, which would exclude things like corn syrup, maple syrup, honey, Kool-Aid, etc... The way it is now, it's very misleading to the reader. Zaereth (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

text: OK, I see that this cat was always "sugar substitutes," but recently the category "sweeteners" was deleted and its contents merged here, per this discussion. (To find the discussion, press cntrl+F and type in "sugar.") Perhaps this discussion should be transferred to that CfD page, which is likely to provoke a wider response. Zaereth (talk) 01:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this category needs bifurcation

message: Sweeteners make things sweet and some contain sugar. Bod (talk) 03:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sugar substitutes means they don't contain sugar
File talk:East-Hem 900ad.jpg

message: On this map I'm currently unaware of the borders in Central Asia for the Uyghurs, Khitans, Kyrgyz, or other Central Asian borders.  Also I'm not 100% sure of the borders of Chiang near Tibet, but that's what was on the map I used for reference.  If you have any further information that may be missing from this map, or can help make it more accurate, please let me know!Thomas Lessman 22:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Borders in 900 AD

message: The (KUMA) cuma river are where U write  cermisses tribe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.1.164.227 (talk) 22:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cuman 

message: The uzes live betwen the Aral lake and Atil(Volga) river (atilkai uzoi).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.1.164.227 (talk) 22:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  uzes
Talk:Network commonwealth

message: I think the book "The Anglosphere Challenge" is a primary source regarding this neologism. Secondary sources would be needed to establish notability. — Ksero (leave me a message, things I've done) 22:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding article sources 

message: Redirecting this to Anglosphere rather than just deleting it. dougweller (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Cliveden (Benjamin Chew House)

message: There were too many problems with the recent anon changes to just accept them unquestioningly. I won't bother to type out a full list and explanation unless someone is serious about contributing and asks. For just a few examples: (1) The idea (flawed, to speak charitably) that the whole Battle of Germantown occurred on one day at one house; (2) The fact that the ideas originally attributed to the Inquirer citation got replaced while the cite stayed the same. If you want to change the article, feel free, but give edit summaries, and go slow enough (1 or 2 changes per edit) that each deletion of existing content and each insertion of new content can be evaluated. Thanks, PhilaRegion1062 (talk) 22:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion of 2010-02-25

message: Is this the Cliveden estate owned by Perl Mesta and later by Lyndon Johnson?  If so, it should be mentioned in the article.98.170.198.158 (talk) 03:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern owners
Talk:Dipodoidea

message: This article can be merged with article on Dipodidae  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khalil Sawant (talk • contribs) 14:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Article on [[Dipodidae]]
Talk:1980 (song)

message: Currently it says released  in 2004, yet recorded in 2005. Can anyone clarify?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.84.107 (talk) 01:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Foster Wheeler

message: One of the largest employers of Chemical Engineers............in?  Britain?  the U.S.?  the world?  Needs clarifying. rich 23:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Contact Us: Global Engineering & Construction Group." 
* "2020 Dairy Ashford Street Houston , Texas 77077-5702"
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:23, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Old Houston offices
Talk:Hadith of Ibn al-Zubayr and Mut'ah

message: in the light of WP:CITE, we note the direct resource from which quotes have been obtained. the article gives the impression that all of the citations have been independently verified, although the reality appears to be that this article is a rehash of material found on a partisan website. the prose is also unencyclopedic, and distinctly pushes a particular perspective. ITAQALLAH 23:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: citing sources

message: This is so biased as to be hilarious. No part of it belongs in the Wikipedia. I would just remove the whole thing - all the text and even the topic. The issue discussed is not of interest to anyone except Shia's deep into anti-Sunni polemic. AT best it should be covered by a single paragraph in whatever article concerns the ways in which Shia marriage customs deviate from the Sunni norm.
I observe my own bias. I think Shia notions should not be presented as at a par with the Sunni norm.DKleinecke (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  must be fixed
Talk:Fort Pentagouet

message: If you look at the link entitled New Horizons - Fort Pentagouet you will notice the text attributes construction to Charles de Saint-Étienne de la Tour instead of the father, Claude and in 1625. This is almost certainly not the case as Charles was otherwise occupied at Cap de Sable in Acadia. He, no doubt, visited the fort on one or more occasions and may have had responsibility for its construction. The fort was built by the father over a period of time. I included that source primarily for the circa 1670 map which may have prompted Randin's trip or may have resulted from his trip. Please clarify any of this material. --Stormbay 23:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Bogislaw XIII

message: Wouldn't Polish Bogusław be better than latin Bogislas? There are quite a few alternative Latin spellings of that name (Boleslaus, for example). We should stick with Polish original to avoid confusion.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  23:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why Polish on English Wikipedia, Piotrus? What "Polish original"? What next, "Jerzy W. Bush"? -- Matthead  Discuß   20:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Piotrus and Molobo pushing Polish POV again, now even way west of the Oder. Shame on you. This person is German, has absolutly nothing to do with Poland, then or now. -- Matthead  Discuß   20:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Bogislaw XIII, Duke of Pomerania, as per other three articles on a Duke Bogislaw of Pomerania. -- Matthead  Discuß   21:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He was Pomeranian, not german. Phillipm0703 (talk) 12:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Isn't his name Bogislaw XI of Pomerania? He is the eleventh duke, so he can't be Bogislaw XIII. Phillipm0703 (talk) 12:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counting
Talk:Master of Engineering Management

message: If anyone has some good ideas to improve and expend this article, let's work on them.--THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 23:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General 

message: I have never seen an article get so messed up by such a large cast of characters.  ----THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 00:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Damage to article
Talk:Nur ibn Mujahid

message: I am hereby making this edit request to restore my previous edit which was modified a few times due to repeated disruptive changes in the ethnic background of Emir Nur ibn Mujahid. The source that I cited in my previous edit is still present which explicitly corroborates the ethnic background of Emir Nur. This source that I provided to authenticate my edit was based on pristine scholarly work that has been cited in many contemporary books which was not altered by the most recent user however this individual altered the ethnic background of the Emir.
This reference below is the source that I wrote in the wiki page and in page 488 there is an excerpt that says Emir Nur hails from the Darod-Somali Marehan clan group. 
Wendt, Kurt (1935). "Amharische Geschichte eines Emirs von Harar im XVI. Jahrhundert". Orientalia (Orientalia, vol. 4 ed.). GBPress. 4: 488. JSTOR 43581078. CSI99283 (talk) 22:51, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , community consensus was that this addition is undue as its a minority view. The vast majority of reliable sources do not comment on ethnicity of this individual. Please see Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Nur_ibn_Mujahid. --Kzl55 (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Copying my response on Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Nur_ibn_Mujahid: As explained multiple times by a number of editors above, inclusion of a viewpoint held by a limited number of sources is undue as its a minority view point. Per WP:RSUW "if a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Wikipedia". If the majority of reliable sources do not comment on his ethnicity then Wikipedia should not either. I suggest you put this to rest. --Kzl55 (talk) 15:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 April 2021 

message: addition of the Emir's ethnic background based on the reliable source that I provided in my previous edit. The change I am proposing is "Emir Nur was considered a saint from Harar, from the Darod-Somalis Marrehan clan.
This is stated in an excerpt on p.488 in the source Wendt, Kurt (1935). "Amharische Geschichte eines Emirs von Harar im XVI. Jahrhundert". Orientalia (Orientalia, vol. 4 ed.). GBPress. 4: 488. JSTOR 43581078 that I have already included into the page's references. CSI99283 (talk) 00:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. This clearly seems to be the topic of the discussion above. Therefore, as per the very clear instructions for edit requests, make sure that the change is not controversial before making a request. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  01:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 April 2021
Talk:STS-124

message: What did the flight director say when Discovery launched?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.110.74 (talk) 21:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saying at Launch? 
Talk:Phronima sedentaria

message: Hi there,
To anyone who may be watching this page, this is just a heads up that I am about to insert a significant amount of information which will further this page's comprehensiveness. Much of what is already present will be incorporated into new paragraphs and a new section will be created.
--Reidtosa (talk) 23:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Addition
Talk:Fort Monostor

message: On the other languages, there are mentioned other buildings connected to the Tentative list of the UNESCO World heritage . It is complex of Komárno — Komárom fortreses. Could someone to add here the othere two forts in Hungary — Igmand and Monostor and also the Citadel — Old and New fortress in Komárno and Palatinial and Vaag line? This buildings are the biggest defend complex of the city in the Austro - Hungary. --Slav Sepo (talk) 11:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:HSwMS Orion (A201)

message: The sources in the swedish article says she was rammed by a Nanuchka-class corvette. /Esquilo (talk) 09:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 1985 collision 
Talk:Philippine Chess Championship

message: According to Mark Weeks , about the 2006 edition: "In April, Darwin Laylo won the Philippine Championship in Mandaluyong City." This contradicts what is written in the article. Voorlandt 00:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I amended this now Voorlandt (talk) 17:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006

message: personally my opinion was to do that because i am now getting into this huge habit of avoiding terms that may not be sex/gender-neutral like filipino (filipina, philippine), man (woman, human), mankind (womankind, humankind), wingman (wingwoman, winghuman) and even terms that necessarily refer to males or females specifically eg Mr/Ms/Mrs (say Mx) or actress or waitress (say actor or waiter) but i didn't think someone would actually have the same opinion. niiiiiiiiiiiiiiice. Thewriter006 (talk) 18:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  philippine not filipino niiiiiiiiiice
Talk:Nuclear or Not?

message: Is this notable for some reason?  (SEWilco 02:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for reminding me that I needed to expand this short article.  Hope this helps... Johnfos 01:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 
Talk:List of The Wire writers

message: The distinction between "regular" writers or directors, as opposed to "repeat" writers or directors seems rather arbitrary. Is such a distinction necessary? — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 16:15, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Regular" vs. "Repeat" 

message: I think its easier to read this way  instead of .  Although a dynamic list would be better than either option if anyone knew how to work a bot to do that.  Opinions?  Dream Focus 15:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  easier to read?