Talk:Ecological sanitation

message: I've marked this article for cleanup because it doesn't read like an encyclopedia article. If you are the author of this article please look at other articles to see the expected Wikipedia format. You might also look at Wikipedia:Manual of style. DJ Clayworth 15:37, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just did a lot of housekeeping on this article, which mostly involved removing duplicate information from the general article on sanitation and organizing what was left in a way that resembled encyclopedic article.  I paraphrased and cited material that I found to be directly copied from the UN source.  I removed some links that I thought were only loosely related; if other editors disagree about their removal they are welcome to re-add them with explanation.
More information is definitely needed on the methods employed in EcoSan; I had a hard time finding concise and useful information on this topic.  I'm not knowledgeable in this area, but may try to do research and expand it some if nobody else takes care of it.  It seems that without the addition of information about the processing methods this article is not very useful at all.
--ThinkGreen 02:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Housekeeping/Cleanup

message: I have added links to ecosan articles other major languages, most of which do not exist yet.  Hopefully someone browsing will add at least a short article in these other languages.
Ianmcaldwell (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecosan in other languages 

message: I don't understand the following sentence:
"a sanitation process that uses human blackwater and sometimes immediately eliminates fecal pathogens from any still present wastewater (urine) at the source."
I would gladly make an edit, but I don't understand what it is referring to. Anyone care to rewrite it?Jimjamjak (talk) 14:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unintelligible 

message: I recently attended the first development conference of the International Water Association in Mexico City. A presentation was given on a project in Guanxi provence where several thousan residents of a multi-story appartement complexes voted to remove their urine diverting toilets and to replace them with conventional toilets. This article leaves the impression that this approach is the wave of the future. It should be edited to reflect this negative reaction.  Rsamstag (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guanxi Province Projects 

message: I cut a huge amount of the salesmanship out of this page, however, there still a lot remaining.  One of the biggest problems is the entire page itself.  this Ecosan as you can see is almost all by example urine diversion dessication.  This whole page simply seems to be a way to describe UDD was in ways to make it sound like the be all end all.  I pooped out on this one.  LOL and leave it to someone to carry from here.  However, I'm thinking the UDD page and ecosan page should be one in the same.  Further, this term ecosan seems to be invented fluff, and I see in the press the term UDD and UDDT the most.  Show me this ecosan system that isn't perhaps.
Work on the UDD page needs to get some pictures.  I found great pics on the web but none were from government agencies.  One thing I found was two spellings of feces...I think someone knows how to make the spelling show up based upon where user is from.Pbmaise (talk) 13:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  For your info, I have done a major rework of this page, removed a lot of the "promotional" stuff. I think it is much better now. For your info I also created a separate page on UDDTs as it is not the same as ecosan. EvM-Susana (talk) 23:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: UDD and ecosan Fluff

message: Could this topic co-inside with ecological sanitation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kasprzd03 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In which sense? Where do you see the connection between ecosan and human ecology? Please explain. EvMsmile (talk) 12:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human ecology 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ecological sanitation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141108000806/http://www.iwaponline.com/ws/00701/ws007010219.htm to http://www.iwaponline.com/ws/00701/ws007010219.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi, User:Jnyssen: I noticed you added two photos of UDDTs to this article recently. I think they are better off to be moved to his article: urine-diverting dry toilet (UDDT). Even if the term "ecosan toilet" may well exist on the ground in Ethiopia, the correct term is UDDT. Therefore, I don't think the two photos are suitable here, especially not in the lead. Also the photo in the lead could be any toilet, just more colourful than pit latrines, so it doesn't really say much about the ecosan concept, which is mainly about reuse. EMsmile (talk) 04:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I will try to improve the photos. Yet, the "chimneys" (one per collection chamber) are typical for Ecosan toilets. Besides, there is no urine diversion in this case. Jnyssen (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please read the article carefully because it explains why the word "ecosan toilets" is ill defined. We have been trying throughout will all the toilet articles to stick to a consistent naming system for toilets. If there is no urine diversion then they are probably composting toilets. EMsmile (talk) 02:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of UDDT photos