Talk:Neo-psychedelia

message: # Undo this edit.  Rationale: The content talks about the origins of the term "acid punk", which is an alternative name for "neo-psychedelia". The rationale for removal implies that the source is self-published, which is false (""). The source is actually a 1993 interview conducted by Stuart Barr for the magazine Convulsion, which is perfectly within the bounds of WP:RS. The interview is available to read online.
# Restore  to the end of this claim: "
Thanks!
Ilovetopaint (talk) 19:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As you have been an active participant in the recent edit war, I will not action any requests without support from other editors. If you are struggling to find others to weigh in, you could try Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Regards  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

text: @, I only agree to add  to the end of this claim: " as it has been reverted by accident. Woovee (talk) 23:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: @,  there isn't any consensus yet...  but when one takes a look at the article... Woovee (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

text: @, I'm tired of dealing with an user who considers this article his own. Look at the history of these recent days. Woovee (talk) 11:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Acid punk is certainly not a synonym of neo-psychedelia. Chilton (talk) 11:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 9 October 2016 

message: I removed additions about Madchester, Jam band, Stoner rock that were haphazardly copied-and-pasted from their respective articles because they infringed on WP:SYNTH and WP:COATRACK. The sources themselves say nothing about the genre known as "neo-psychedelia". What some of them do mention is psychedelic rock — information that is better suited for the article Psychedelic rock (WP:CFORK). Besides that, other issues in this revision have to do with removing sourced content (such as "acid rock" as a genre synonym). ili (talk) 03:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If understand you well, you are arguing that "neo-psychedelia" is not rock music. The current version of the article which can be assumed is the one you support includes within "neo-psychedelia" these bands: "the Church, Nick Saloman's Bevis Frond, Spacemen 3, Robyn Hitchcock, Mercury Rev, the Flaming Lips, and Super Furry Animal". With the possible exception of Spacemen 3, which can be said to be post-rock or drone music or indie electronic, ALL of those other bands are clearly rock music. Also all the other bands mentioned in this article. Their music is played with electric guitars, bass and drum set and so all of their articles say they are rock music and outside sources such as Allmusic say they are rock bands. They tend to be seen as part of a subgenre of Rock music which is Indie rock which is included in the main Rock music article. On the other hand this version of the article does not deal with non-rock psychedelic music such as psychedelic trance or goa trance or acid house. Allmusic itself classifies neo-psychedelia within rock music in this way: "Pop/Rock » Alternative/Indie Rock » Neo-Psychedelia". Also it clarifies that "for the most part, it has been chiefly the domain of alternative and indie-rock bands". As such neo-psychedelia is mainly rock music and should be seen as a subgenre of rock music and as mostly a section of the subgenre of rock music known as indie rock.--Eduen (talk) 19:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost everything you just wrote is your own original research and synthesis. The only verified claim we can extrapolate from the only reliable source you cited (AllMusic) is that neo-psychedelia is mainly a rock genre. Key word: "chiefly". The source also does not suggest that "neo-psychedelia" is relevant to every rock genre conceivably influenced by psychedelia. See Wikipedia:Meaningful examples in pop culture. ili (talk) 01:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring, content forks, and coatrack issues