lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gasterophilus haemorrhoidalis

message: The sentence found in a previous version "the larvae grow in the sinuses and throat of the host animal, and are sneezed out in the spring" does not apply to equidae, the most common host of the parasite (it is found in posterior rectum, hence its name haemorrhoidalis). So I think the former contributor, seeminly having experience with reindeer, meant "in reindeer, ...". I changed then : In reindeer, the larvae grow in the sinuses and throat of the host animal, and are sneezed out in the spring.''
Please, verify the fact.
Lucyin (talk) 14:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Condition in equidae
Talk:Giant Fijian long-horned beetle

message: Please help in formatting: I can't add the link to the first paper. The second too seems to me wrongly linked--Vitalfranz (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikilink 

message: Stupid image showing human hand next to large insect. No one knows the size of that hand! For reference a soda can of USA Coke could've been used, or a dollar bill. Or a baseball. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_Fijian_long-horned_beetle#/media/File%3ATaveuni_longhorn_beetle.jpg 09:29, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: So, do you have a good copyright-free image you can upload to the Wikimedia Commons? If not, then we have no choice but to use this stupid image, since this is the only one there. Dyanega (talk) 17:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stupid image showing hand with large insect
Talk:H. Evan Runner

message: *No merge Although Runner was influential in the founding of the ICS he was never a professor there - he is more associated with Calvin College.  Runner is a very influential person in the reformational movement and deserves an article of his own.SteveBish 07:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge?
Talk:Macrobrachium rosenbergii

message: This one doesn't have the "Edible crustaceans" box at the bottom like other pages on prawns do (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiphopenaeus_kroyeri), though I got here through clicking the link in said box. Satkomuni (talk) 09:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add the "Edible Crustaceans" box
Talk:Prosopocoilus giraffa

message: Merge (duplicate) For taxonomy see  so we also need a spelling 
change to girafa and notes on synonymy including giraffa
Here  Cladognathus is a treated as a Subgenus This site has a detailed synonymy and should be included in External Links Notafly (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glanville fritillary

message: This is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan (2007) species—GRM 15:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 

message: Hi,
As part of a school assignment I reviewed this article and found that it is comprehensive and thorough. I added some information I felt was important to the conservation section, as well as making minor grammatical edits. 
Iginsberg (talk) 19:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Small Edits

message: I think a key strength of this article is the many pictures inserted. However, this article is quite incomplete and could use an addition of many new sections, as it is considered a moth of high importance.  It could benefit to know some information on flight habits, parasitism, mutualism, etc.  I have made some changes relating to improper grammer, as the common name was capitalized in many places.  I also changed the Migration section to Mating as Migration was not mentioned in that section.  I also added to your lead section and added some information on diet in a section. Sahilmehta97 (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This article seems to focus mainly on the occurrence of the butterfly in Finland and the UK. Given that it occurs over most of Europe, a more European-wide view needs to be taken. Also, I have just removed the following sentence, which is clearly rubbish. There are many species of butterflies called Fritillary. Portnadler (talk) 09:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a more European-wide description of the distribution
Talk:Gliding ant

message: This article does not explain how a gliding ant would change its course. Do they bend their legs, twist their body, use a special organ, or something else? That would certainly be useful information to include here. Thanks. — Epastore 13:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added what I could find.--Vaihead (talk) 01:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do they change direction?
Talk:Gnathophyllidae

message: Harlequin shrimp are completely reef safe, but should not be kept by beginers. Their diet is soley star fish. They will not harm any other tank inhabitants. Will hide most of the time until a star fish is added to the tank, when they will almost immediately come out from hiding and over power their prey even at 10 times their size. Their front legs act as a pseudo needle type projection that temporarily paralizes the prey, enabling the shrimp to flip them over and carry them off.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.206.67.100 (talk) 02:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reef tank compatibility and behavior 
Talk:Goose barnacle

message: How are they related?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biologos (talk • contribs) 13:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Barnacle]] 

message: Hope nobody minds, but iv put up a picture of barnacles washed up in my home town of Tramore, Ireland. Sully (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I mind. The picture is 90° rotated and the cirripeds have not been identified and the quality of the pic is mediocre. Lycaon (talk) 22:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 

message: I assume this meant geese could be eaten during lent? (cf. wallfish). Drutt (talk) 21:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Geese = fish?

message: Hi. In Capo Verde thay are names perceves. Is it good in portugal or it shoiuld be percebes ? TIA --Adam majewski (talk) 11:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: « In the days before it was realised that birds migrate, it was thought that barnacle geese, Branta leucopsis, developed from this crustacean, since they were never seen to nest in temperate Europe [...] Since barnacle geese were thought to be "neither flesh, nor born of flesh", they were allowed to be eaten on days when eating meat was forbidden by Christianity,[2] though it was not universally accepted. » Did they actually not know that birds migrated (seems dubious) and believed that geese came from barnacles, or did they just use this as a plausibly deniable excuse to eat meat on fast-days? -- Phyzome (talk) 17:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geese and barnacles: Sincere belief, or wink-and-nod loophole? 

message: * Why Gooseneck Barnacles Are So Expensive | So Expensive --Adam majewski (talk) 19:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  videos
Talk:Ding (surname)

message: We generally don't give tone mark in the title of Chinese-themed articles.  Badagnani 07:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of tone mark in title

message: Ding family of chendai
http://books.google.com/books?id=PK_keabzacsC&pg=PR13&dq=Ding+saudi+arabia&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LYPSUOz_OcSx0AGg8YHYBg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Ding%20saudi%20arabia&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=PK_keabzacsC&pg=PA62&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WnvSUPHFMoKR0QH1wIHgCA&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=baiqi%20fujian&f=false
http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/chinese-iranian-vii
The quanzhou hui dong clan in malaysia (ipoh and melaka)
http://www.islam.org.hk/eng/malaysia/ChineseMuslim_in_Malaysia.asp
http://210.0.141.99/eng/malaysia/ChineseMuslim_in_Malaysia.asp
http://www.islam.org.hk/en/?p=12&a=view&r=43
http://www.islamhk.com/en/?p=12&a=view&r=43
Rajmaan (talk) 03:19, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: quanzhou Hui Ding lineage
Talk:Pelidnota punctata

message: Found a Grapevine beetle in Ashton, IL today (7-8-12). This is the first time I have ever seen one of these beetles. Although these beetles do cause damage to the grapevines, I believe most of the damage to my vines is due to the Japanese beetles. 
50.103.21.235 (talk) 00:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Grapevine beetle found in Ashton, IL

message: Are they poisonous? 50.25.44.21 (talk) 02:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grapevine beetles
Talk:Grapsus grapsus

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Grapsus grapsus Galapagos Islands.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 21, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-10-21. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 17:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Grapsus grapsus Galapagos Islands.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Zayapa (Grapsus grapsus), Las Bachas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 30.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 17, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-05-17. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Zayapa (Grapsus grapsus), Las Bachas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 30.jpg scheduled for POTD 

message: Can someone fix the page up? The vandals won't leave it alone. 71.8.68.68 (talk) 02:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Panchlora nivea

message: Nutritional value of banana roaches as feeder insect..(how many grams of protein) 2601:1C0:8500:7840:AC12:A7A8:7D90:3C63 (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nutritional value  

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Reverted at request of original mover (non-admin closure) —blindlynx 13:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Panchlora hebardi →  – Please restore to Q3481897 - stub page moved in error by me (wrong authority) Roy Bateman (talk) 10:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Please expedite - when I try to undo this move I get "The edit appears to have already been undone. You may have attempted to undo a page move, protection action or import action; these cannot be undone this way. Any autoconfirmed user can move the page back to its previous location" ... - but this is not happen. Roy Bateman (talk) 14:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 October 2023
Talk:Green darner

message: This article should be about the species Anax junius and the common name "green darner" should redirect there. I intend to intitiate this change pending discussion.Nickrz (talk) 01:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no need to move the article. According to the Arthropods Project Guidelines on naming: "In cases where common names are well-known and reasonably unique, they should be used for article titles. Scientific names should be used otherwise." DGERobertson (talk) 17:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anax junius 

message: The article says that "The Green Darner is one of the largest dragonflies existent: males grow to 76 mm (3.0 in) in length with a wingspan of up to 80 mm (3.1 in)." Is the female significantly larger? Or is it possible that the length is only the body (excluding tail) and the "wingspan" is actually the length of a single wing? I'm asking because this weekend I saw (and photographed) what appears to be a green darner -- it looks just like the two photos used of females -- but it was certainly larger than 3 inches long with a 3 inch wingspan. I will try to go back and measure the flower I photographed it against to get a firmer idea, but I'm guessing it was about 4 inches long with a 4 inch wingspan, or maybe even a little bigger. Of course, it's possible that I saw the largest green darner in the world, but it seems more likely to me that the numbers in the article are incorrect. cmadler (talk) 11:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size
Talk:Green shield bug

message: In our garden in Nez Zealand they are a pest and they suck from Tomatoes and Fruit, especially pears. 95.222.220.207 (talk) 17:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  eating fruit in New Zealand 

message: This article should be merged with green stink bug which is more complete and concerns the same animal. Hmoulding (talk) 14:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Green shield_bug_(Palomena_prasina)_3.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 17, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-03-17. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 13:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Greenhouse whitefly

message: Does anybody know where the name vaporariorum comes from? Would be a good addition to the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNk22 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vaporariorum name source? 
Talk:Greta oto

message: What predators are there for the Glasswing Butterfly (Greta Oto)?
68.35.209.155 23:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Predators

message: I will be adding multiple sections to this page as part of a behavioral ecology course. 
Meganav (talk) 22:39 , 10 October 2017 (UTC)
:It was a very interesting butterfly to begin with, just looking at the pictures. This was a very well written article. It had multiple pictures, the overview covered everything, there was a lot of interesting information. If anything, adding a conservation section could be helpful and potentially adding a little bit more about its migration patterns. The article was written in a clear and concise manner as well. Good job! Mperumattam (talk) 17:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits for a behavioral ecology course

message: This was a well-written article that was able to effectively communicate a lot of information without being too long or wordy. Because there were no major edits that were needed, I was looking to see if there was any information out there to contribute to a new section. It seems like the original author did a great job of covering the existing literature! So, I ended up reviewing the article itself and only adding minor edits. First, I included the Spanish name of the butterfly as it is endemic to mostly Spanish speaking regions of the world. Additionally, I chose to reorganize the sections to make the section on defensive coloration a sub-header under the "Predation" section as there was very little information here. Overall great article!Moid.ali (talk) 00:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review  

message: Hi there, I made a few edits, mostly to sentence structure and grammar. Overall this is a very complete article and I didn't have much to change! While the butterfly is described throughout the article, it might be nice for there to be a dedicated description section. Great job! Lilymalcolm (talk) 23:10, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review

message: This article is written very well and flows smoothly. I just went over some basic writing mechanics and looked at some of your references but I think this article is more or less ready for a good article rec! You might want to add more to the geographic range section though, it seems a little sparse compared to other sections. Good work!!
Iginsberg (talk) 23:38, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review
Talk:Hemigrapsus crenulatus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Hi there!
I have just finished my peer reviewed of this article and it is looking great!
Keep up the great work!
Amhughes1138 (talk) 21:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review completed
Talk:Halloween hermit crab

message: The article could use some expansion on this subject, given that it appearted on the main page.  What trick is used on snails?  At the moment the article only notes that hermit crabs will occasionally attack snails for their shells, which is presumably true but does not mention any subterfuge. Wyvern (talk) 16:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's just a play on words for the hook. For halloween, a little more leeway is allowed than would normally be permitted. SmartSE (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trick a snail? 
Talk:Hangingfly

message: Moving a tagged out reference from the tax list to here in case some one wants to look into its relevance to the article: "Znvertebr. Taxon., 1994, 8, 767"
--Kevmin (talk) 03:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged out cryptic references
Talk:Plesiosiro

message: The taxobox refers to Plesiosiro madeleyi? FunkMonk (talk) 07:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically both, as Haptopoda contains only Plesiosiro.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, the standard thing for monotypic higher taxa is to have the article at the species or genus level, with the higher taxon a redirect, but explained in the text. FunkMonk (talk) 14:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Shall we leave the honor for you to handle, then?--Mr Fink (talk) 14:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! FunkMonk (talk) 14:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this about an order or a species?
Talk:Helicoverpa armigera

message: I suggest this be "high" as it is a major pest species—GRM 19:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 

message: I have removed the common names "American bollworm" as this species is not found in the Americas. See the distribution map [here]. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Common names
Talk:Helicoverpa zea

message: Yennguyen356 (talk) 21:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

message: I added much more information, covering a broader range of behaviors and adding to other features of the life of this moth  --Vpandrangi (talk) 19:07, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: I changed two in-text citations to the correct format, and made a few very minor edits. Here are some things that could be improved:
Under Life History and Life cycle, the larvae and pupae sections could be combined since the pupae section is only two short sentences. In the adult and larvae sections, parts of the description of these two stages are redundant with the description section above. It may be best to have this information in one place. Finally, in the introduction it is mentioned that the adult moth acts as a pollinator. It might be nice to have a section that describes its role as a pollinator, and which plants it interacts with at that stage. Abuatois (talk) 00:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: I fixed some minor grammatical and stylistic mistakes and made some sentences more clearer. These were pretty minor and overall your contribution is very good. I would suggest improving the introduction a bit, though. It focuses on the larvae and its behavior instead of giving an overview of the animal at large. Solon5g93 (talk) 22:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: More Comments
Talk:Heliothis

message: For the sake of transparency: redirected a bunch of synonyms of this genus that somehow had their own articles (consisting of little more than the text that it was a former genus now considered synonymous to Heliothis) to this genus page as should have been the case from the start. More specifically, Curubasa, Pradatta, Dysocnemis, Neocleptria & Lecerfia. Also unlinked them from the infobox, because there's not a lot of use in linking redirects right back to this article. AddWittyNameHere 05:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonymous taxa
Talk:List of architectural vaults

message: Hi Jreferee.   I saw the listing you made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, and your proposal, while uncontroversial, may not be possible.  Article histories aren't stored by section, but just one version after another.  When you look at the history page, each of those versions is something that could move, or not.  There's not really a set of versions from here that contain the history of the architectural information and not lots of other stuff that it can't be separated from.  I hope I'm making sense...
If you can see a reasonable way to split off part of the history while keeping the history of what remains in the right place, I'll happily do it, but I don't see it.  Perhaps it would be better to leave a note at Talk:List of architectural vaults indicating that the material for your initial version came from Vault (disambiguation), where people can find the GFDL history if they need it.  The whole point of preserving histories is so that content can be traced to a particular contributor, so as long as we leave a paper trail, we're generally pretty happy.
Please let me know if I can help in any way. -GTBacchus(talk) 07:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GFDL history

message: I don't think so. Agree or disagree? WCCasey (talk) 20:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Cavetto a type of vault?