Talk:Osmanabad district

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Nomination appears to be in error. No evidence was given that the district was renamed. Link is about the city. (non-admin closure)  Venkat TL (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Osmanabad district →  – The city has been renamed, per source 1 and source 2 Hey man im josh (talk) 14:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

text: Is the new name in common use? See the discussion about renaming Faizabad to Ayodhya district or Allahabad to Prayagraj district. I know it was referred to as Dharashiv before the Nizams renamed it but that still doesn't mean it is the common name today. C1MM (talk) 15:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 June 2022 

message: This is an important request, please do not ignore it.
As of today, Osmanabad has been changed to Dharashiv on the orders of Central Govt. of India.
I will be glad to be heared upon and allow me or many other contributors like me to do the required changes.
Thanks and Regards PSDA1 (talk) 12:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: This article is about the district, the city is at Osmanabad — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2023 

message: Recently GOI renamed Osmanabad as Dharashiv so I urge to change the subject name. Shreyashmali100 (talk) 09:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Shreyashmali100 That is about the city, not the district — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the subject name  

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved The opposing argument that this isn't even the official name has gone unrefuted. (closed by non-admin page mover)   * Pppery * it has begun... 14:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Osmanabad district →  – commonname is Dharashiv since ages Anubhavklal (talk) 11:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Another one from Zee News Marathi (translated) dated 21 Apr 2023 says the same thing. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Easier to pronounce isn't a valid argument, it depends on the familiarity and the individual. Also common name trumps official name as can be since in Germany and many such high level articles. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 July 2023 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 19:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Osmanabad district →  – earlier move request was primarily rejected as the name was not formally recognised, even though in common use. As per WP:Common article title should be common name and not necessarily official name. Anubhavklal (talk) 14:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 August 2023