lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arlo and Janis

message: What needs a reference? /Timneu22 00:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Under the heading "Arlo and Janis's relationship", the following statement is made:
In a medium where long marriages are presented as either sexless or antagonistic (The Lockhorns, Andy Capp, etc.), the strips that show the couple's ongoing physical attraction to each other are a refreshing and realistic alternative.
To my ears this sounds less than neutral (not to mention rather inaccurate on its own terms; regular readers of the strip will tell you the title characters are often extremely antagonistic toward one another). Mdumas43073 23:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: The characters section needs updating.  I've read Arlo and Janis for several years now and neither Arlo nor Janis has worked during that entire time.  They are both obviously retired.  I myself do not know when, etc. this developed, so do not want to do the updating on this. BlueIris2 (talk) 01:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  the characters section needs updating
Talk:Adamson Awards

message: If someone would like to update the list, there's more info here: http://seriewikin.serieframjandet.se/index.php/Adamsonstatyetten (Including "Gold-Adamsons" and Special Diplomas). 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * 11:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd do it but it's a wiki, and the actual sources aren't found. Please post if known. Murghdisc. 18:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Can someone more in the know determine if this is a misspelling?Srednuas Lenoroc (talk) 04:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Agust" 
Talk:Aku Ankka

message: I am hesitant to add this under the category :Category:Finnish comics titles as it is not a comic by Finns, it is a comic by foreigners translated to Finnish. There is at least one Finnish Donald Duck artist and writer, but it still doesn't make the entire comic Finnish. What category should be used instead? JIP | Talk 20:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: JIP, my impression is that the comics are produced in Finland. I could be wrong; if so find a source stating that the comics aren't produced in-house. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wilfred Jacobs

message: Was he British or Antiguan?  This would be nice to indicate. john k 18:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The caribbeanelections.com page, used as reference #1, lists this Wikipedia article in its Sources section. Eulogiante (talk) 11:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular reference?
Talk:Good Shoes

message: Why is it "Good shoes" and not "Good Shoes". Surely it should be in capitals? btw great band! Poiuytre 18:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The beginning of the article states that Good Shoes are an Indie Pop band, but in the genre section it is stated that they are Indie Rock.
I'm changing this. 88.106.239.241 17:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I've been considering this one for a while actually after I looked at this page ages ago. I think I made a few edits on the page on night but then forgot to save them. In response to your quiery (Sp?), I would say indie rock. A vote, anyone? Here Goes...--SteelersFan UK06 02:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indie yes, but pop or rock? 

message: ===For Indie Rock===
*SteelersFan_UK06
*User:Zwerrifringweraand
*Teehee51  —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Shoes Genre: Indie Rock/Pop?

message: *SteelersFan_UK06
*User:Zwerrifringweraand
*Teehee51  —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: For Indie Rock

message: *88.106.239.241 (proposed)
Comments appreciated.
* Bad music anyway. The guy can't sing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.70.252.16 (talk) 09:36, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: For Indie Pop
Talk:Arcana Studio

message: Should the titles that Arcana publishes each have their own separate pages? A lot of them are good, but might not be that “notable”. 144.226.230.36 23:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual Comics Pages 
Talk:Wilhelm Stieber

message: Stieber in London and Karl Marx
According to Wheen, Stieber came to London "in the Spring of 1850 masquerading as a journalist called Schmidt."
i.e. not the Winter of 1850 as stated.
Reference:
Francis Wheen's biography of Karl Marx, page 163. Fourth Estate, paperback 2000.
Tasuketai 18:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: More details from Chancellor's Spy should be included in this biography.  And the information already presented in the article, cited as coming from Stieber's book, should be double-checked for accuracy. Stieber's mother came from Oliver Cromwell's line, but Stieber doesn't say his mother's maiden name was Cromwell. Also, Stieber posed as a journalist to gain access to Marx, then as a doctor to gain access to the Communists' list of members. He accompanied the records as far as Marx's home, but neither Stieber nor the records made it inside. Stieber took the records back to Germany, so I'm not clear what is meant in the article about what happened to the records after Stieber obtained them. A few too many convenient dots are connected here. --Pat 09:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chancellor's Spy 

message: What evidence is there that Stieber "worked in reality for the Tsar's Ochrana" ? I've read a couple of articles about Stieber but is it hard to actually put them online since it is difficult to double-check their accounts of his life. None of them however mention him as a spy for the Russians. Could this be a mix-up with Alfred Redl who lived in the same pre-World War One period and was a traitor ?--Marktreut 18:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stieber and the Ochrana
Talk:Bandarban

message: This aritcle is nothing but a hoax. There is no such place as described in this article. For the real Bandarban check Bandarban District. Some people, I guess, do not understand that this is not the Uncyclopedia, and articles like this are more an irritating botheration than a funny joke. I strongly propose a speedy deletion for the article and may be a temporary ban on the person - User:Dhakaiya - who submitted this fabrication, though he seems to have made many contibutions. He seems to have a stated objective of creating at least one stub for every Bangladesh city, whcih may be a frustrating proposition if he starts adding hoax-cities like this false Bandarban. You may also like to check out the Wikipedia:Hoaxes policy page. - Aditya Kabir 18:28, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax made in poor taste
Talk:Arzach

message: This article starts talking about the comic book series, then bleeds into the character, then other works featuring said character.  It needs to figure out what this article is actually going to be about.151.166.15.115 (talk) 05:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree, all the topics are sufficiently related, and there is not enough information warranting a split. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Character
Talk:William à Court, 1st Baron Heytesbury

message: The Complete Peerage (1st ed.), HoP, Hansard, UK National Archives, DNB and ODNB all state the surname as A'Court. Is there a source that states the surname as à Court? ネイ (talk) 08:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the surname really à Court?
Talk:Backing board

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: 0.30 and 0.40 aren't very helpful without recognizable units.  Points don't fit the bill.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.53.229.150 (talk) 12:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are points?
Talk:Robert Rogers' 28 "Rules of Ranging"

message: In my Ranger Handbook it lists the fictional rules from the novel Northwest Passage.  As far as I can tell, the fictional rules that are listed here are the only ones published and used by the modern day US Army Rangers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.226.95.18 (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can confirm that the "fictional rules" are the exact same as listed in decades of revisions of the official Ranger Handbook (SH 21-76) 24.209.108.157 (talk) 02:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Major William H. Burgess III, “The orders attributed to Rogers are in fact a mid-20th century corruption of an earlier fiction. They were drawn, almost verbatim, from Kenneth Roberts' 1936 novel Northwest Passage (Ballentine Books, 1991), which was set among the French and Indian Wars. The orders are, specifically, a paraphrasing of a conversation between the fictitious characters Sergeant McNott and Langdon Towne, in which McNott, a bumpkin-like character, tells Towne what he needs to know about the Rangers (pages 87-88).” He goes on to say that "In about 1960, almost a quarter-century after Roberts penned this conversation, a captain assigned as a doctrine writer at the Infantry School lifted it out of context, paraphrased it, attributed it to Rogers, and included it in the early version of Field Manual 21-50, Ranger Training and Unit Operations. There, in an appendix on Ranger history, the purported orders embedded themselves in Army doctrine where they have remained substantially unchallenged until now." Infantry Magazine, July-August 1993 (https://drive.proton.me/urls/XGFC2VXNVM#vhFgKnqQKIIG) ExitOzone (talk) 10:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional rules? 

message: I have proposed that some of the content in Rangers Standing Orders be merged here. My reasons:
# Rangers Standing Orders contains the same 28 rules, but in an expanded form, apparently taken from Rogers's own journals (citations are inadequate)
# I question the accuracy of the  first list in that article it's from a novel published in 1937
# That article already has cleanup issues, and it makes more sense to merge the valuable content here.
Alcarillo 19:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Why are 29 listed here? Alcarillo 20:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  29 rules???
Talk:Alström syndrome

message: Much of this not-well-written article appears to be mostly lifted from other sources. It therefore needs some serious rewriting. One pirated source is: http://www.ajnr.org/content/early/2014/10/29/ajnr.A4115.abstract?related-urls=yes&legid=ajnr;ajnr.A4115v1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.155.194 (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut and paste job 

message: In  Marshall J, Paisey RB, Carey C, Macdermott S. Alström syndrome. GeneReviews. May 31, 2012 Obesity indicates to occur in 98% of cases (Table 3. Age of Onset and Incidence of Common Features of Alström Syndrome) while in the article it's 100%. 98% is based on New Alstrom syndrome phenotypes based on the evaluation of 182 cases. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:675–83. Is it an original research or should we correct the number and add the source?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by US812 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* Signs and symptoms */
Talk:William A. Rowan

message: This article was created in 2005. Being in the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress (Representative) infers notability and precedent has been set to include main "citywide government officials" such as Chicago City Council. but primary sources, GNG and even politician still apply. Using a link in the "External links" as an article source has been found by broad community consensus to be improper thus the tags.  Otr500 (talk) 23:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Talk:Puerto Rican women in the military

message: An elaborate hoax of wxtremely bad taste, was made which made people believe that a Selian A. Diaz was a Puerto Rican soldier who had perished in the War in Iraq. 
Investigations were made and there is no verifiabl eproof that said person even served in the military:     
*Check for official DOD document(s)
http://www.defenselink.mil/search/
SELIAN A. DIAZ
Result:
No document found matching SELIAN A. DIAZ.
*All the references are from guest books and forum web sites, none reliabloe nor verifiable.
She does not appear on other well-know casualty sites. 
Such as:
www.fallenheroesmemorial.com
www.militarycity.com
www.pigstye.net/iraq/
*All causalties are listed and released by Dept. of Defense.
http://www.defenselink.mil/
*Noemi Figueroa, pointed out to me, that she was not listed on DOD causualty release. She had a ret. 65th Borinqueer research her also he also  could not confirm her. This is what he concluded:
Here is what  ret. 65th Borinqueer who helps with Noemi Figueroa (PRSOLDIER.COM)
in searching for fallen boricuas at this time of war.
While looking into her casualty status, early on - when it first stated appearing online, 
I felt something was not right about her - how she was described, how she wasn't in uniform, how she appeared more sensual than military.  She was portrayed "too heroic" and "too tragic" when compared to the other casualties, and there weren't any reports in the papers about her casualty status at thev time. I was skeptical then, and remain so now.
Until someone else can prove to me beyond a reasonable doubt that this person was truly an official casualty - or was in the military for that matter, I will not believe this person was in the military, served in the Iraqi war or became a casualty.
Angel 
Memo: no articles at Puerto Rico Herald web site on her nor anything about celebration.
===Conclusion===
In conclusion too many strange post, SELIAN A. DIAZ is an hoax. Tony the Marine 22:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About the Hoax of SELIAN A. DIAZ

message: In conclusion too many strange post, SELIAN A. DIAZ is an hoax. Tony the Marine 22:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conclusion
Talk:William A. Wheeler

message: *What about William A. Wheeler role in the Wheeler Compromise aka Wheeler Adjustment Which settled the disputed election of 1874 in Louisiana and the interference of the military in the organization of the Louisiana Legislature on January 4, 1875.  see 12,3,4, 5,6, 7,8,9,10,11, 12,13, 14,15
--Looktothis (talk) 21:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheeler Compromise aka Wheeler Adjustment
Talk:William Aila

message: I propose that this article should be redirected to Hawaii gubernatorial election, 2006 as per the usual Wikipedia practice for unsuccessful political candidates who have no other source of notability except having been a candidate. If there are no objections, I will go ahead and redirect the page in a week or so. --MelanieN (talk) 18:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I had forgotten about this article, but it seems high time to do the redirect. The recent additions violated BLP policy. --MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect proposal
Talk:Beach Head (G.I. Joe)

message: Should talk about 'fanon' be allowed? 
Lots42 23:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fanon suggests?

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Replacement window

message: In the opening paragraph we read:
    "They need replacement not only to improve the appearance of the house but also to take advantage of modern energy efficient windows that bring about an overall improvement of the ambiance of the house at low recurring cost of heating and cooling."
That they "need" replacement has not been established.  Someone may "wish" to replace them, but that is only one option.  That they improve the appearance or ambiance of the house is a subjective opinion.  In an older home they would actually ruin the architectural integrity of the house.  And the "low recurring cost of heating and cooling" has been disproven: they have been shown to work no better than existing windows.  See www.historichomeworks.com/hhw/education/WindowsHandouts/WindowEnergyAnalysis.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.109.237.56 (talk) 11:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

message: I'm doing POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 20:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag
Talk:William Alexander Fraser (politician)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 11:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 March 2021
Talk:Belphegor (comics)

message: Propose that the article be moved per the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics) guideline, to fall in line with all the others using (comics).
Anyone have strong feelings and good reason why not? MURGH disc. 09:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unopposed move completed. MURGH disc. 22:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: A lot of this entry seems to cover things not related to the comic and should probably be elsewhere or rewritten to fit with the topic (I also don't know why there are links to 3 IMDB links either, are they relevant to the comic?). Equally the webcomic seems to be purely about a demon called Belphor and nothing to do with the comic under discussion so should probably be removed. All this seems to have stemmed from this the content being split off from the Belphegor entry and it seems like it had more general and un-related information in that was dumped here . I'd suggest stripping this entry right down and rebuilding it back up with relevant information. (Emperor 02:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, much look like leftovers. It appears that the comics-Belphegor is somewhat of a minor event, or sequel to the 1965 TV series, consisting of 24 France-Soir episodes and nothing more, whereas the film-book-TV events are the bulk of the creation. Stripping down is a logical next step unless an expert comes in to shape it. Murghdisc. 08:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Related content
Talk:Arab contributions to science

message: This article appears to be completely false historical revisionism, with no references.  My previous attempt to get it deleted was unsuccessful, so I'm not sure what to do with it.  --Holdek (talk) 07:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The disputed tag may get someone to provide references.  If it doesn't work, you could nominate it for deletion again, or just be bold and redirect to something like History of science or Arab.  Mangojuicetalk 18:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good idea.  I'll probably redirect it to History of Science if there aren't any references provided after a while.  --Holdek (talk) 06:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:Apparent mineralocorticoid excess syndrome

message: You may consult the article http://www.uptodate.com/contents/apparent-mineralocorticoid-excess-syndromes-including-chronic-licorice-ingestion for adding more details on the disease & also its treatment.195.134.64.225 (talk) 08:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: More details; treatment is not mentioned
Talk:Bernard Prince

message: This free picture can be used as a source for the French edition for what here is called "General Satan". Possibly, it can be released under a CC license and then uploaded to Commons.
comicsbox.it shows another version of the same picture, but with a better resolution. Best regards. Micheledisaveriosp/Philosopher81sp  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.38.236.251 (talk) 21:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources about "Le general Satan"
Talk:William A. Buckingham

message: Regarding the move of this page, William A. Buckingham (45%), William Buckingham (39%), and W. A. Buckingham (13%) are the only iterations of Buckingham's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com in Connecticut. Star Garnet (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Enter: Naruto Uzumaki!

message: I added the header thing for that, so people could look (assuming they look at the first episode for comparision to all episode) about the situation and AfD statis of the Naruto Episode summaries since they differ from the existing manga plots comprised in their section for the article about Naruto the anime/manga.
71.71.79.235 18:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Televison
Talk:Billy the Cat (Belgian comics)

message: I've moved this section to the article Billy the Cat and Katie as that relates to the correct Billy. But the autoforward at Billy the Cat and General Jumbo needs changing. Digifiend (talk) 14:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billy the Cat and General Jumbo 

message: It seems that the artile mixes two different comics both named Billy The Cat and made by Desberg and Coleman, but having very little in common: the first one, quite grim like the article says (and really good too, especially for when it was published) which appeared only in Spirou Magazine; and a retconned one which was published much later and is aimed at much younger readers.41.219.54.227 (talk) 00:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion?