Talk:List of Wario characters

message: In the video I had seen of her games in Smooth Moves, they seem to use the english voices rather then the original Japanese ones. It could be they did this so they wouldn't have to localize the entire set of voices for her, as the rest of the cast say mostly simple phrases that wouldn't be hard to understand in either region. Interestingly enough, while they probably gave her a new voice actor that would be for her song and character, Mona's voice is the same, though it could be either she doesn't sing the lyrics, her VA could speak both languages, or they just had a different one for the song/s. Oh yes, and another example of her possible nicer side is in both a segment of her English song, and alot of her Japanese song, where from what I read she seemed to mostly just want to party, with the kind part being her talking about being lonely. 69.175.57.72 09:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashley's Japanese VA not in Japanese Smooth Moves? 

message: With an English version of the game coming out very soon for the US and already being out in Europe, it would be a good chance to refine the page based on what occurs in the English version, though it possibly won't change much, since 90% of what is posted here is so far just observable stuff from the game. Just a heads up. NelsonJ 01:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Version of Smooth Moves out in Europe, US Version coming soon. 

message: I deleted the part about Mona's band being the "Hawt Slices", because it says in the WW:Touched manual that it's the "Hot Slices." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.54.208.43 (talk) 19:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mona's band 

message: What should they be referred to as? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.86.142.90 (talk) 05:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Those birds who protect the Temple of Form 

message: The character is just a simple side character that needs little expansion. A list entry should be plenty. Nemu 02:45, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is this so called notability? The number of appearances only helps the notability of the subject; it doesn't define it. The character is a spin-off only character who has only played true roles in two of the games. That earns him the list entry, not the article. Nemu 22:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that Nintendo continues to include him in games, even spin-off ones, should be enough. Other Mario-universe characters that have made less appearances garnered their own Wikipedia pages - Wart, Albatoss and Toadette come to mind. That being said, if you are intent on merging Waluigi into a list, at least keep a link to the Super Mario Wiki and its more extensive article on Waluigi. Suigi 01:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:WAX. I could care less about the link, but if they have something like this on there, feel free to link to it. Nemu 02:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. The link to the Super Mario Wiki is here. That being said, if Waluigi is notable enough to garner a page on that wiki - and quite a sizable one, too - then why not here on Wikipedia? Sorry if I'm being a stickler on this point. Suigi 17:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that is a specific wiki based around the Mario series, so the criteria for articles is different. The information there wouldn't be accepted here. It has no baring on this site. Nemu 17:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gotcha. In that case, I'd like to downgrade my vote to a Mild keep, if such a thing exists. Suigi 21:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: How many times do I have to say it? That is what earns him a spot on a character list. The notability of the character doesn't even fully decide if he needs a page. If Mario was as popular as he was now, but only a paragraph could be written about him, he wouldn't get an article. A character needs notability and proper information; Waluigi has neither. Nemu 17:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It really doesn't matter if people believe that he is important; they haven't shown it. Just because he is a recurring Mario character means nothing. This isn't a pure matter of notability either. He has nothing more to write about (explaining every game appearance for minor characters is out of the question). WP:WAX is for anyone using an article to justify another. It's a broader version of the Pokemon Test. Wario characters are inheritably Mario characters, so it doesn't really matter where he goes. Nemu 10:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Let's not prioritize Waluigi, though. What bugs me is that Wart, Tatanga, and Tryclyde keep their articles while Waluigi, a recurring playable character does not. Sure, one might bring up WP:INN, but I find a flaw in that; sure Waluigi does not belong, but he certainly belongs more than Wart, Tatanga, and Tryclyde. In other words, I'm suggesting a shift in priority: Get Waluigi after those other guys. I'm curious about why you flew straight to Waluigi rather than characters where you'd face little opposition. You Can't See Me! 06:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not bothering with them yet because it would be impossible to do a clean merge. Look at the crap that we call an enemy page. It is full of useless junk because of one person. I can't feel good increasing its size until it is actually cut down. I would love to merge a lot of these, otherwise. Nemu 10:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried it out now. It's on the enemies list instead of here. Nemu 19:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which was promptly undone by a user already. I don't think I've seen anything in support of the merge except from you, Nemu. It just seems rather Sisyphean to keep pushing this issue. Suigi 04:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really care for support in this situation. None of you have provided a rational argument. All you spout is WP:ILIKEIT, WP:WAX, and other crap like that. Those aren't arguments; they're fan pleas. If this were a borderline case or something, your opinions would outweigh that, but this is clear cut until someone can provide some other argument. And PoD would undo any merge if he had the power, so I don't really pay attention to him. Nemu 10:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

text: How the hell do you people not even notice the guidelines? Per WP:FICT, only characters with proper, OOU writing, and reliable sources need articles. He can't be attributed to any decent sources, and he pretty much fails WP:N when comparing his notability to the whole series. These do not just go away because you can dig every argument out of WP:ATA. Nemu 23:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, I would be satisfied as long as there's a link to Waluigi's article on www.mariowiki.com wherever he ends up. This way, the fans can get the information they're used to. Suigi 00:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: That's the actual merge. The discussion is only here because it started here. TTN 01:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh... Eh he... My bad! *runs* You Can't See Me! 02:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately, I'm stuck with The Prince of Darkness, who hates any sort of merging, to revert any attempts. If the info required for a character page is found, this can be brought back at any time. TTN 13:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, forgive me. What I mean is that I don't really care what happens with the page; so I'm not against merging Waluigi with whatever page, but I'm not NOT against it, either. ; ) Hardcore gamer 48 12:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Waluigi merge

message: :Image:Ashley-ds.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ashley-ds.gif

message: Ashley's Theme as been noted that it will be in 6 languages, not just Japanese and English. Also, the current use of the song is currently unknown, so don't assume it is going to be the Wario Ware stage currently announced, they could make an Ashley's Mansion stage. Thanks.
OBEY STARMAN 15:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It says the game is in 6 languages, and it is technically not out, and he did not state that it will only be English and Japanese. The Donkey Kong Rap was translated into several languages in the European version. OBEY STARMAN 19:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The game, as far as we know, is not is six languages. Note that, with the exception the Japanese site, all screen shots with text in them, are in fact, in English, even the Mr. Resetti update (Languages other then Japanese and English have the shots in english, translated at the bottom of each shot). Also, nowhere on the sire does Dojo say that the game will be in six languages. I quote from the Ashleys theme update: Smash Bros. Dojo is being unveiled worldwide in 6+1 languages. Meaning: Dojo!! is in six languages. Like the above IP said, the site has not confirmed that Ashleys theme will be translated into four other languages, and saying otherwise would be speculation. Dengarde ► Complaints  04:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Your right, but please don't add "is likely to be the Wario Ware Stage". That is speculation too. OBEY STARMAN 13:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashley's Theme in Brawl Notice 

message: :Image:Crygor smooth moves.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 18:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Crygor smooth moves.PNG

message: :Image:Monascooter.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Monascooter.gif

message: it isnt his tongue its his beak dumbass  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.61.173.81 (talk) 03:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pyoro