Talk:Destroyers-for-bases deal

message: A list of these vessels, their new names and fates, would be useful. Drutt (talk) 11:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a list of the ships. Drutt (talk) 13:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I will be incorporating this information into the article over the next few days. Drutt (talk) 16:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to italicize the names of the vessels to keep the article in-line with the guidelines of WP:SHIPS. -MBK004 16:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is a work-in-progress. I intend to link them all to articles eventually as well. Drutt (talk) 16:44, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ships

message: The Bahamas is omitted under this heading and after doing some online searching, I'm unable to find the base name & island it was on during that time period. All it had been said was 'on the eastern part of the Bahamas' but no further details as to where exactly & until when it got closed. That-Vela-Fella (talk) 19:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally got back onto this and found some info (although still not able to find when it got closed).That-Vela-Fella (talk) 20:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The Bases

message: Unfortunatly, all 3 external Weblinks given in that section are broken. 
89.15.161.13 (talk) 13:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  external Links 

message: Why did the Axis not declare war on the United States after this agreement? (213.122.111.142 (talk) 10:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Why should they? ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 17:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation of US neutrality 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Destroyers for Bases Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070430005310/http://history.navy.mil/faqs/faq59-24.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq59-24.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Destroyers for Bases Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313081150/http://www.seaworthy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=456&Itemid=471&showall=1 to http://www.seaworthy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=456&Itemid=471&showall=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927222102/http://www.shsu.edu/~his_ncp/IntNav.html to http://www.shsu.edu/~his_ncp/IntNav.html
*Added  tag to http://projects.ilt.columbia.edu/antigua/base/Article
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "destroyers-for-bases deal" is a 6-gram, since hyphens count, so we have to unpack it some to get stats from Google ngrams. Dicklyon (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage stats

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Tagged: This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help improve it by rewriting it in a balanced fashion that contextualizes different points of view.
* What ideas, incidents, or controversies?
* List them here, or remove the tag. We (I) cannot rewrite the page if you do not give feedback.
Telecine Guy (talk) 23:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 7 months later and no feedback - I think it's safe to remove? Couruu (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, agree. Rjensen (talk) 16:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies