Talk:Arti (Hinduism)

message: Regarding the Aarthi page, wanted to know whether you could add a clarification whether the rite is an act of worship of deity, as in the Catholic latria, or merely an act of homage. 
See my page: http://www.geocities.com/prakashjm45/aarticontroversy.html
Lucio Mas 14:40, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Aarti is worship. And don't visit Lucio Mas' page; it's full of crap and hatred. Armyrifle 19:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worship or homage? 

message: I was wondering if anyone could tell me if this photo depicts aarati? MishaPan 15:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems he is holding a thali (plate) for aarti, but not performing the ritual itself! --Ekabhishek (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Seems to me the word can't descend both from Skt aradhana and from Skt aa+rati. —Tamfang (talk) 19:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology 

message: Do the brushes in the image at the right have a specific name in Sanskrit/Hindi? Is their waving part of the Aarti ritual or is it a separate ritual? Is this used in Bengal only, or is it all over India? Wiki-uk (talk) 05:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is called a chamara Fly-whisk and can be seen also as an attribute of some deities like Varahi or used by attendants or consorts to fan the main deity as in :File:AshtaSiddhi.jpg. It is not an integral part of aarti and is a separate ritual in itself. The chamara is used for fanning the deity at any time (not especially aarti, but may accompany aarti). --Redtigerxyz  Talk  05:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about brushes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Aarti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added tag to https://www.sursaritatechknow.com/category/aarti_sangrah
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060111090050/http://www.atmajyoti.org:80/vi_india_videos.asp to http://www.atmajyoti.org/vi_india_videos.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Stronger consensus needed to determine whether we should accept current usage or long-term significance as the determining factor for the primary topic, per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 16:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject Hinduism has been notified of this discussion.  ASUKITE 14:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 September 2021 

message: Hi folks, the Gaudiya Vaishnavism section doesn't have any cited sources. Can anyone provide any sources to support this section? Also, the description of the arti echoes what is described about the practice of the arti in the "practice" section but the paragraph asserts that "In Gaudiya Vaishnavism, arti refers to the whole puja ritual, of which offering the lamp is only one part." This suggests that there is some difference between general Hindu practice of arti and Gaudiya Vaishnav practice of arti-- can someone find a source to support this implied statement? Thanks, Hemmingweigh (talk) 06:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaudiya Vaishnavism Section