lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alive, She Cried

message: The second reference cites the album liner notes.  That seems to contradict Wikipedias policies on primary research and reliable sources.  It's not WaPo or Newsweak, is it? 216.209.40.180 (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary research
Talk:Ad hoc testing

message: The two views should be merged to one (and some parts transferred to exploratory test). Ad hoc and exploratory testing are not synonyms. Ad hoc testing + documentation + planning for next tests = more formal exploratory testing. A divergent view that has been seen is something like "ad hoc testing is sloppy and careless and should never be performed by professionals". This view isn't neutral, and shouldn't be included in the article. Epim 09:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:C++Builder

message: I was looking this page a few months ago because I wanted a similar application but free software.
I do not know how to add to this page:
See Also
WxDev-C++
It can be useful for some people looking for a  free integrated development environment similar to C++ builder. unsigned comment 05:51, 14 November 2006 130.206.92.100 
:I added the See also section. (See: WP:LAYOUT#See also; it's "See also" rather than "See Also".) --Teratornis 20:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a See also section 

message: I added an  template to . I could not 
determine the values for these fields in the template:
 latest_release_version =  |
latest_release_date =  |
I am asking anyone with knowledge of this product to complete those fields. Thanks.
--Teratornis 21:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Infobox Software 

message: According to all of the official images and literature from the product developer (Borland and now CodeGear), the name of the product is C++Builder, with no space between "C++" and "Builder". I see that most references to the product name in this article insert the space. Is there a reason for this or is this a typing mistake? Notbyworks 21:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: This article states:
"Other popular visual RAD tools include Delphi, JBuilder and C# Builder from Borland, and Visual Basic from Microsoft."
While the article on CSharpBuilder states this tool is not popular and is not supported:
"C#Builder's functionality has since been incorporated into Borland's Delphi and C#Builder is no longer developed as a separate application."
Which is true? --Stardancer 06:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  C# Builder not popular RAD tool? 

message: Article contains too much hype. Some one should do something about it.
"C++Builder includes tools that allow true drag-and-drop visual development, making programming easier by incorporating a WYSIWYG GUI builder into its IDE."
Oh, really? I thought they only provide the false drag and drop, and make development really tough.
BS like that must be deleted/edited to fit the style of article, and not infomercial (a kind of comercial
that tries to make you think it is a useful information, and not yet another hype).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.139.8.77 (talk) 08:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fight the hype! 

message: I'm adding more detail to the release feature lists and version history.  Might remove the version history table altogether once those dates are noted in each release's section. Ildrummer (talk) 00:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revising release history
Talk:The Art of War

message: Just checked both the Marine Corps Association website  as well as the CMC Professional Reading Program list  (which seem to be identical lists) and the Art of War is not listed in either location. Perhaps it was on the reading list at some point, but has since been removed?  MrAureliusRTalk! 04:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer on Marines PRL?
Talk:Stacker

message: I've made quite a number of spelling, grammar, and punctuation edits to this article, but it still needs work. Hoping someone more familiar with the topic will step in and edit. I don't want to misinterpret and change meaning unintentionally. Katherine Daisy Anderson  15:23, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 

message: the concepts are nearly identical, it might take an expert to tell them apart.
specifically, the Stacker page is already links to de:Absetzer, and contains a picture of a german surface mining machine, while Spreader_(mining) assumes to be specifially about (surface) mining.
(added the same talk page entry to both pages) 77.23.1.131 (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge (or diversify) [[Spreader_(mining)]] and [[Stacker]]?
Talk:D-10 tank gun

message: Battlefield.ru's articles on the SU-100 and D-10 gun cite a length of 56 and 53.5 calibres, respectively, although their big table lists 53.5 for them both.  Did the D-10S and D-10T have the same barrel length, or different? —Michael Z. 2006-12-16 02:11 Z
:53.5 calibers is probably the "bore length" of D-10, while 56 is probably the "overall length" including breechblock. Bukvoed 10:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barrel length 

message: The ammunition section states: "In 1967 the 3BM6 hyper-velocity armour-piercing discarding-sabot round (HVAPDS) entered service, which could penetrate 290 mm of armour at 2,000 m, or 80 mm of armour angled at 60 degrees from the vertical." 
This is obviously wrong. If an 80mm plate were sloped at 60 degrees from the vertical, it would have a relative thickness of only 160mm, not 290mm. The plates true thickness must be 145mm, since that would (at a 60 degree slope) give it a relative thickness of 290mm.
To repeat, an 80mm plate cannot have a relative thickness of 290mm, that is factually incorrect and in need of an edit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myopia1 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  HVAPDS penetration
Talk:Danube school

message: We are going to be updating this article in class today! Please check out www.firstgiving.com/douglasawh (until March 20th 2007).  The event benefits the kids at www.hoop-dreams.net! 19:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this article could benefit from some more variety of source material and improved citation formatting. I've included some sources that I think would be beneficial to this article but I don't have access to currently.
* "Landscape" by Erika Langmuir (Yale University Press, 1997) - This book is a pocket guide to landscapes and contains a section on the Danube School
* "Wolf Huber studies : aspects of Renaissance thought and practice in Danube School painting" by Patricia Rose (Garland Pub., 1977) - This book could help improve both the notable artists section and the characteristics of the Danube school section
* "Der Wald in der Malerei und der Graphik des Donaustils" by Margit Stadlober (Böhlau, 2006) - The title of this book loosely translates to "The Forest in the Paintings and Imagery of the Danube School" and I think it would be a great asset to improve this article. Unfortunately I only have an access record of it and not the actual book.
* "Malerei der Donauschule" by Alfred Strange (Bruckmann, 1971) - The title of this book is "Painting of the Danube School" and appears to be fairly extensive from its access record. I'm not able to find a copy of this one.
If any other editors speak German and are able to translate source material into English, I think this article could greatly improve. For such a notable topic in the history of German art, I'm amazed that I was unable to find more sources in English.
Kmitchell2015 (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There will be plenty in English. For example, Wood, Christopher S., Albrecht Altdorfer and the Origins of Landscape, 1993, Reaktion Books, London,  is a significant book. I'm dubious that the recent changes by your colleague are an improvement, so far. Johnbod (talk) 13:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source material
Talk:Soundstream

message: Could someone please source the above reference. Thank you. 83.180.133.119 11:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! (For the record, prior to Bop till You Drop, Denon made several digital audio recordings, but at 14 bits and thus not audiophile quality. Between Bop till You Drop and the Orinda recording by Soundstream, there may have been a 'Christmas in Vienna' digital recording. The first digital audio release to excite the recording world, however, was Telarc's Frederick Fennell: The Cleveland Symphonic Winds.) Ssier (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added SL-10 model number for the Threshold preamp.Neuperg (talk) 08:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  re "world's first digitally recorded commercial release" 

message: *http://daniellevitin.com/levitinlab/articles/1994-Levitin-SignalParent.pdf
*http://daniellevitin.com/levitinlab/articles/1994-Levitin-JNARAS.pdf
*AES E-Library - Restoration of Old Acoustic Recordings By Means Of Digital Signal Processing
*Blind deconvolution through digital signal processing. Proc IEEE      Thomas G. Stockham Jr, Thomas M. Cannon, Robert B. Ingebretsen  Proceedings of the IEEE (Impact Factor: 4.93). 05/1975; 63(4):678 - 692. DOI: 10.1109/PROC.1975.9800 Source: IEEE Xplore
*Journal on the Art of Record Production ISSN: 1754-9892 Soundstream: The Introduction of Commercial Digital Recording in the United States Simon Barber Issue 07 | Digital Audio Recording, Soundstream | November, 2012 
*Thomas Stockham Restoration - Billboard Dec 3, 1977
*RLE Currents | June 1989
*TECnology Hall of Fame, 1877-1950 | Mixonline
* Audio forensic examination
64.175.41.42 (talk) 18:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas G. Stockham Jr

message: "the first audiophile digital audio recording company"
was there a non-audiophile digital recording company before Soundstream?
was it really an audiophile digital audio recording company?
feels more like it was backend, production, not direct to consumer at all
2001:4479:8400:8701:E528:6E20:C6D2:2EA0 (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: First
Talk:Bernhard Joos

message: Provide basic information on the founder of the pharmaceutical company Cilag. Pvosta 11:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Turtle Creek, Dallas

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus to move. —Mets501 (talk) 03:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
* Oppose.  I prefer Turtle Creek with the standard disambiguator of (Dallas), thus giving Turtle Creek (Dallas). But Turtle Creek, Dallas is okay.  Convention or not, Turtle Creek, Dallas, Texas is a horrible and nonstandard way to refer to that community.  --Serge 03:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:The Midway State

message: Hello Wikipedia administrators. 
Please do not delete the profile for The Midway State as there is documented support that meets and possibly exceeds Wikipedia guidelines. 
Wikipedia Guidelines State:
"A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, hip hop crew, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) is notable if it meets any ***** one ***** of the following criteria."
I have found 4 matching criteria, even though the guideline calls for only one. I believe this strongly supports Wikipedia's criteria, as I outline specifically below. 
All the following references are also properly referenced within the article. 
Thank you for your consideration.
-->12. Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast on a national radio network.
YES *****
MTV e2
http://www.mtv.ca/?vid=108585
-->5. Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers (although university newspapers are usually fine), personal blogs, etc.)
YES *****
MTV e2 nationally aired television program segment
http://www.mtv.ca/?vid=108585
MUCH MUSIC
http://www.muchmusic.com/music/artists/bio.asp?artist=1789
411mania.com
http://www.411mania.com/music/album_reviews/426/Midway-State---Wide-Eyed-EP-Review.htm
http://www.411mania.com/music/columns/10858/TSO-08.25.03:-The-Local-Scene.htm
   
Truth Explosion
http://www.truthexplosion.com/live/interviews/interviews.php?id=5  
UpBeetMusic
http://www.upbeetmusic.com/reviews/651
   
-->3. Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country,[1] 
YES *****
reported in notable and verifiable sources.[2]
YES *****
Truth Explosion
http://www.truthexplosion.com/live/interviews/interviews.php?id=5   
   
-->4. Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
YES *****
EMI and Rememdy Music
EMI publishing distribution for their Self Titled EP:
http://www.shopemi.com/album_page.asp?upc_id=875918000424 
Wide Eyed EP Review
http://www.411mania.com/music/album_reviews/426/Midway-State---Wide-Eyed-EP-Review.htm     
  
  
Thank you very much, again, for your consideration. 
-rockthetaskbar
non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media
That is superfluous language and should be removed. There are too many opinion words there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.76.158.149 (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:High schools in Norway

message: I moved everything categorized under this to :Category:Secondary schools in Norway to keep the schools of Norway categories consistent. Most of the videregående skoler were categorized under that category from before. I'm willing to have those schools categorized here if it's for the better and arguments are presented. I'll even assist in the move if you drop me a line. Delta Tango • Talk 11:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Indica Gallery

message: I've spotted a number of issues in the article.
-It focuses on Indica's famous patrons (Paul and John), and not on the art that was displayed there. Yoko Ono's article has more comprehensive information on the type of art that was displayed at the Indica.
-It does not speak of Indica's closing, but only alludes to it at the beginning.
-It should include more information on 2006.
I'd change it myself but I don't have the knowledge. 68.183.182.60 (talk) 00:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 

message: I think Mayfair generally means the area north of Piccadilly. This gallery is south of Piccadilly and I believe the area between there and The Mall (where the Indica is located) is called St James's. Can someone confirm/amend?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.164.105 (talk) 14:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mayfair or St James's?
Talk:Free City of Frankfurt

message: --OberMegaTrans (talk) 16:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  We're working on the sections "Schwarz-Rot-Gold" & "Ende der Freien Stadt" 
Talk:Cicero (typography)

message: I had to remove this statement on metric standardization:
"In 1973, the cicero was metrically standardized at 4.5 mm."
Compare the different, more complex (and highly confusing) info on French points in:
Point (typography)
This article still has metric equivalents in the right sidebar that I'm leaving -- should be researched and corrected as needed -- looks like there is no one standard though.
BIG QUESTION what is the cicero size in modern computer page layout software? For example Quark, etc. can use ciceros I believe.
From Donald Knuth's TeXbook:
* pt point
* pc pica (1 pc = 12 pt)
* in inch (1 in = 72.27 pt)
* bp big point (72 bp = 1 in)
* cm centimeter (2.54 cm = 1 in)
* mm millimeter (10 mm = 1 cm)
* dd didot point (1157 dd = 1238 pt)
* cc cicero (1 cc = 12 dd)
* sp scaled point (65536 sp = 1 pt)
From that we get one cicero = 12 dd = 12 * 1238 / 1157 pt = 12 * 1238 / 1157 / 72.27 in = 12 * 1238 / 1157 / 72.27 * 2.54 cm ~ 0.4513 cm. The article states one cicero is exactly 0.45cm. I have no idea if that is correct in any interpretation. --82.128.250.221 (talk) 00:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: From the pdfTeX manual: "Two new units of measure were introduced in pdfTEX 1.30.0: the new Didot (1 nd = 0.375 mm) and the new Cicero (1 nc = 12 nd) (the former was proposed by ISO in 1975).". So I guess that as far as modern is TeX is concerned a 4.5mm cicero does exist. --82.128.250.221 (talk) 23:29, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Had to remove this on metric standardization... 

message: In modern times, all computers use millimetres as font, line, and paper size measurement – alongside millimetres.
This statement here is completely nonsensical. Anyone have any clue what it is supposed to mean?
--D A Hosek (talk) 02:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical statement 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cennaroll (talk) 19:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Graphic Design History
Talk:Georges Jobé

message: are you sure Ray Archer took the pic i thought it was Nick Haskell (Sp?) 160.5.247.8 11:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:History of phycology

message: An earlier effort to enter a reference lost almost the whole article. Opening a previous edit and deleting the effort at making a ref (.)  seemed to retrievr the article. Waow (spelling)~~~
Thanks to help received I am now adding the refere4nces in wike-manner, but leaving for the moment the author's name in as a check until all is confirmed.~~~~
I'll try again~~~~
Tried again - lost the lot! ~~~~
Tried again - entered the reference:- <ref>Morton, A.G. 1981. History of Botanical Science. Academic Press, London
OK but how do I get this into the List of References in alphabetic and numerical order? Osborne 12:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Should this be translated into other languages? How? & by whom? Osborne 10:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translations:

message: I've removed it, as it only contained the following out-of-place limerick: 
"There was a young man named Linnaeus,
Who found that all nature was chaos,
He set out to describe,
Every species and tribe,
Species that nature would no longer betray us."
Akriasas 18:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trivia" section 

message: --
This image and a sentence about Atkins' work would be appropriate for this article. --68.127.232.132 (talk) 17:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anna Atkins' work 

message: Interested - the French translation seems quite different! My French is poor but...well, well, well...
Osborne 18:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: Lead section is very short for a B-class article. It does not really summarize the content. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 17:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section too short
Talk:Research International

message: xx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.219.46.7 (talk) 14:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Building the Builder's: Exploring the experiences of OJT Civil Engineering Students 115.147.25.228 (talk) 09:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building the Builder's: Exploring the experiences of OJT Civil Engineering Students
Talk:Winfrith

message: Although I started this article I now feel it would be better merged with Winfrith Newburgh and "Winfrith" redirected to there. Any opinions? Britmax 12:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be kept as it is.  It would help with efforts to organize information about past and present nuclear sites.  It's not a completely useless stub. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 23:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm inclined to agree that the title of this article should contain some reference to the nuclear facility (as was). In the meantime, I've assessed the article (as it stands) for the Dorset WikiProject; I've rated it as being of 'Mid' importance, even though the site is being decommissioned, as the history of the site is important both for the nuclear industry as a whole and also the wider region. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 10:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Queenborough

message: MR GREET AND THE NEAR DESTITUTION OF QUEENBOROUGH.
in the 1820s the town's corporation (led by the mayor called Thomas Young Greet) came in to conflict with the town's fishermen.  It led to the town's near destitution.  It is quite a saga which I've only picked up in snippets using Google Book Search.  Is there a modern account of these events?
Paul Buttle (email Buttlekeswick at hotmail dot com) - 8th October 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.193.205 (talk) 13:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answer: Yes. See http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1820-1832/constituencies/queenborough. Broichmore (talk) 13:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas Young Greet -1829)

message: Gene Wirchenko genew@ocis.net: This article states that Queensborough is 2 miles south of Sheerness.  The Sheerness article states the figure as 1 mile.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.181.25.30 (talk) 03:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Answer 2. Fixed. LOL. Broichmore (talk) 13:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Query on distances
Talk:Friedrich Carl von Savigny

message: This article is heavily biased towards Savigny, and the impact of his works in terms of discrediting the works of others is exaggerated. That said, it is not a bad starting point. Hullaballoo84 08:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias. 

message: His first widely recognized work "Das Recht des Besitzes" is mentioned early in the article and translated with "The law of property". But "Besitz" does not mean property, it means possession. As in Rome ("nihil habet commune proprietas et possessio"), possession and property are sharply distinguished in german law. I suggest somebody change that.
: Done. Languagehat (talk) 12:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion for improvement 

message: A very significant dispute between Savigny and Thibaut was the so-called codification dispute. Savigny resisted a binding codification because he saw the roots of Roman law in the work of the glossators, post-glossators and later mediaeval works of the usus modernus pandectarum spilled. Before a codification could take place in Germany, in his opinion, the roots of Roman law, especially of canon law, would have to be exposed again. Please forgive me for my bad english. mg Stephan Klage (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codification dispute
Talk:Pressure politics

message: Because I'm a pedant like this: In response to the last paraphrase, from 101 - 102 of Asbury's The Great Illusion, I'm tempted to call npov here. Asbury states that neither Pussyfoot nor his associates were "punished or even reprimanded;" further, he even states that they were "justified." However, there's a distinct difference between whether something is moral or justified. Anyway, I'm nitpicking. Here's the passage so you can judge for yourself:
"Although Pussyfoot Johnson's political operations failed by a large margin to conform strictly to the Christian principles upon which the league had been founded, neither he nor others who employed similar 'variations' were ever punished or even reprimanded. It was generally felt by prohibition leaders that since the league acted as the agent of the churches and was therefore engaged upon the Lord's business, anything was justified which might help gain the ends desired by the Almighty." (102)
67.187.213.152 13:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]