lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sarah Brendel

message: first question: do you have a link to her label's (Gerth/Medien) page where the copy vio originated? I see this page, but it's in German. A translation is not considered a copy violation. Her MySpace page does share the content though, but then see below.
second question: which came first--the external page or the content in Wikipedia? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:59, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright (1.) I've got english translations here and here which are both labeled as being "courtesy of Gerth/Medien". I take that to mean that the label or their PR etc. wrote it. It is likely that that's the official translation, which would still be subject to copyright. The first link, to Christianity Today contains links to some of their own content as well, reviews and the like. Where Christianity Today publiches artist bios they are, in my experience, almost 100% of the time taken from press kits. (1a.) What was posted here is nearly a direct copy of the first three paragraphs. (1b.) Take a look at the revision that it was added on - It was added by an annon, and the edit is clearly a hack job by the standards that we try to keep. See how "Discography" was replaced with "ALBUMS!", a new album was added: "2008: Early Morning Hours (Gerth Medien)BRANDNEW!", and "PLEASE GO TO: http://www.sarahbrendel.de" was appended to the end of the article. (2.) I cant's say exactly which came first, as the Internet Archive is being or no use to me here, but let me say again that this is certainly from a press kit. Follow the CT link to the next page, you'll see that the bio continues into a breif about the aforementioned new album, Early Morning Hours. For me, this again serves as evidence that it was from a press kit. Dan, the CowMan (talk) 02:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the English translation. Internet archive was down when I went there as well, but I think it's safe to assume that the company's English translation came first, distributed as a press release and then the press agent inserted it into Wikipedia. I'll see if I can re-craft it in the coming weeks. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've got some edits coming for it too. Just thought I'd start by cleaning. ;> Dan, the CowMan (talk) 04:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy vio?
Talk:Aura Herzog

message: My surname is Herzog but I do not believe I am related to this Herzog family; however, I am Jewish so there might be some distant connection. If I find out I am related I will cease editing this page. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest statement 

message: is it always called "palestine"? It was called Israel before "palestine"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:A040:19B:214D:6824:1C16:CADD:38F9 (talk) 08:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why
Talk:Ortley, Oregon

message: I added a modern-day photo of this area, at least as close as I could get on public property. A historic photo is needed, but (currently) that is outside the scope of the reqphoto part of WikiProject Oregon. tedder (talk) 06:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: *http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~westklic/howcoc7a.htm
Looks legit, but hard to tell what the original source is (a book? document at the historical society?) Valfontis (talk) 21:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite for expansion
Talk:Leisure Books

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Starspinner. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Fram (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Starspinner" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Nitrosyl

message: Suggestions?  Comments? Objections? These articles describe what appear to be the same thing, but maybe I am missing something.
: I agree, same chemical species i.e. R-NO -- Quantockgoblin 22:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections here, I went ahead and tagged the article. shoy 17:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose to merge [[Nitrosyl]] and [[nitroso]]
Talk:Nitroso

message: Suggestions?  Comments? Objections? These articles describe what appear to be the same thing, but maybe I am missing something.
----
4r
:Here's the Gold Book definition: http://goldbook.iupac.org/N04169.html
:I don't mind whether we merge the articles or not.  If merging means that the content improves in quality, then great!
:Ben 23:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problems here. Went ahead and added the merge tag. shoy 17:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged both articles and explained the org/inorg specificity Corpet (talk) 10:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose to merge [[Nitrosyl]] and [[Nitroso]]

message: n-phenylnitrosoamine ought to be changed into N-phenylnitrosamine. A capital N is used to indicate that the phenyl group bind to a nitrogen atom. Possibly the N should be numbered to indicate which nitrogen atom but this is probably superfluous since the phenyl cannot be substituted on the other nitrogen at least not without changing the molecule from a nirosamine into something else.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 09:55, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nitrosation vs. nitrosylation figures
Talk:In the Pink

message: I heard my father use the phrase "in the pink" as a child, meaning to be in a good or profitable position.  It was used in an innocent way.  I have recently (45 years hence) wondered if there were not some sexual overtones to this phrase, and, that's why I went to Wikipedia to learn more.  I'm not into to too much of the current popular music, as this post seems to be centered on.  How can I or we go about finding more concerning the history of this phrase?
Pcmacd 04:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:M13 link

message: Note to readers: the correct name is M13 Link, but the wiki standards circa 2007 are that the name is just 'M13' with a informal 'link' added. However, M13 Link is correct short form according the U.S. military. Ve3 23:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: M13 Link
Talk:2009 FIFA U-20 World Cup

message: Since the decision was to be made last month, doesn't anybody know which bid was chosen? I can't find anything about it on FIFA.com . --74.56.171.85 23:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Are the list of teams per pot in the seedings section correct? They look pretty haphazard... two seeded teams in pot one and one in pot four, England ranked below Tahiti... if these are correct, how were the teams in each pot (and therefore the seeds) calculated? Grutness...wha? 02:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seedings 

message: I dont know how to fix this, can someone look at it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaa (talk • contribs) 09:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Third - fourth mixed up in the infobox

message: Quarter-finals
10 October 2009
16:30
Brazil 	2 – 1 (a.e.t.)	 Germany	Cairo International Stadium, Cairo
Attendance: 32,935
Referee: Roberto Rosetti (Italy)
Maicon  88', 90+1'	Report	Holtby  73'
There is an error. Maicon scored in the 91st minute (in Overtime or extra time).
Richard Lyon (talk) 17:17, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Extra time. Thank you. -Koppapa (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 20 March 2013 

message: # 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
-- 186.153.106.116 (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final ranking 
Talk:Cornerstone Church (Nottingham)

message: This page should be a disambiguation page, not a direct article. 
1Timmo1 (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two different figures given.
Notreallydavid (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction cost
Talk:Kate Crackernuts

message: Ok, what needs to be done to clean it up?  Goldfritha 23:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: Ref 4 (currently) is shown as extinct.
This is the page as archived on the waybackmachine:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101230090700/http://journal.petajinnathandersen.com/2008/01/kate-crackernuts-commentary.html
81.153.19.104 (talk) 06:49, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived Link for inclusion in Reference Section
Talk:Cylindropuntia fulgida

message: There is a very large amount of overlap between this article and the article on the Opuntia ficus-indica, the primary edible species. One resolution would be to merge them, but it might be preferable to move the content concerning the edible plant and its fruit into the other article. Liam Proven (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? What overlap?  They are completely different plants. Stan (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger? 

message: I am fairly certain that the picture on this page is of a Teddy-bear Cholla. It has much finer spines than the Jumping Cholla. Please compare the pictures on this page, the wikipedia article on Teddy-bear Cholla, and the pictures on this external link  68.84.206.80 23:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are right. I removed the pic, along with the accuracy tag. If there was something else in the article you thought was inaccurate, feel free to replace it. But that was definitely a TB Cholla. Jumping Chollas have thinner and longer branches. --DanielCD 23:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Picture

message: I don't know the original values but the conversions between metres and feet are incorrect. 
For example 300-1000m is ~980-3300ft, 4m is ~13ft, 2-3cm is ~0.8-1.2inches. However as I said I don't know which are the original values. The conversions are definitely off though.
124.148.206.193 (talk) 12:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Values are Inconsistent

message: The Description section needs to have the SI units and imperical units swapped around (SI put in the parentheses and imperical in the sentence proper). 
Reasoning: this article is about a plant that is primarily a plant in the USA, and in the lede units are given in square miles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.82.68.160 (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  inconsistent measurement units 

message: Under "Description," the article reads:
While the name "jumping cholla" is applied especially to this species, it is also used as a general term for all chollas. (who says that? only Cylindropuntia fulgida, and sometimes Cylindropuntia bigelovii are called jumping cholla)
Blandcrowder (talk) 16:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate over content is live on the entry 
Talk:Taos Ski Valley, New Mexico

message: I would like to thank user user:Paxsimius for cleaning up the vandalism someone caused by calling "Taos" by the name of "Tacos." However, in so doing he or she also removed mention of the waterway that appears to be the headwaters of the Rio Hondo. So I restored that. Thanks.Hawesinsky 23:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suggest that the entry "Taos Ski Valley" be separated into two articles, one for the village and the second for TSV: the ski resort. While obviously linked, the former article could cover the history of the area and the latter could be restricted to the the ski resort, which richly deserves far more than what we have here! Mamerritt 01:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Divide article proposal

message: How about someone makes another page about the Ski Resort, and have both this one and the new page accessible from a disambiguation page? Paris456 00:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instead of a split... 

message: I’m proposing the article be split finally. It doesn’t follow the general pattern of how articles concerning ski resorts with eponymous towns are handled; For example, Breckenridge,_Colorado and Breckenridge_Ski_Resort. This is exactly how I propose the titles of the two articles be written. Even for the Swiss ski resorts which are often municipally run and integral with the town, the two entities usually have separate articles. Antcomp (talk) 12:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur An Errant Knight (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Support, per Antcomp. Kehkou (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. Libcub (talk) 08:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raising split proposal again
Talk:Lytle family

message: Perhaps this article should be split into three articles, one for each man, provided better inline citations and other improvements are made before doing so. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:23, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three articles? 

message: I am about to change a paragraph to correct grammatical errors and add a citation. I may also change a fact that I haven't been able to verify, about one third of the battlefield being named for Lytle. If correct, it may mean just the actual historic battlefield, whereas the whole park is informally called "the battlefield," which could lead to confusion. 
Here is the section I will rewrite, saving it for reference: " A third of the battlefield is named for him and a pile of cannonballs mark the spot where he fell. When he was shot and fell from his horse with a half-finished poem in his pocket. A southern soldier who served with him in the Mexican–American War, stood guard over his body under arrangements could be made to return his body to the North. Under a flag of truce, both southern and northern soldiers escorted his body to Louisville where it was loaded on paddlewheeler and returned to Cincinnati. Since most soldiers were buried where they fell in the Civil War, few bodies were returned to their families. The city immediately went into mourning with all the windows of the stores draped in black. " CohuttaBlue (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections and Additions
Talk:Rete testis

message: "the sperm are concentrated as fluid and is reabsorbed."  did you mean the sperm are concentrated as fluid is reabsorbed?  As it is, the sentence seems to imply that sperm are reabsorbed.  The sentence that follows imply that if sperm are not concentrated then infertility results.  So... It would make the most sense if "and" is removed. SiriusAlphaCMa 23:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording / Confusion
Talk:Aloys Wach

message: This book shows up in Worldcat, so I took the liberty of removing the 'cannot locate'. Harvard's library has a copy of this work, and they note that the ISBN is invalid. That probably means they found the number from a reliable source, like the book itself. They note that the work was self-published. EdJohnston 23:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ISBN of Heinrich Fuchs reference
Category talk:LGBT Christians

message: I don't have sufficient skills to add him, but you've missed out Malcolm Muggeridge.
CO.
It should be noted that the term "Christian" here is being used in its most liberal meaning.
Nospamtodd 14:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been. Did you bother even to scan the page? PenguinJockey 21:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Nevermind, should have looked at the history page on her article.  There's a reference buried there to an essay about her conflicted Christian faith.Shikitohno (talk) 02:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Besides extreme churches like the Westboro Baptist Church, most Christian churches will accept people regardless of their sexual orientation.  However, many will maintain that they follow the same laws as others in the church, that is no sex outside a heterosexual marriage.  The issue isn't whether they identify as gay, but how they live their lives. Joshuajohanson (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. Sin is as much accepted in most churches as disagreement on many issues. Glatisant 11:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Depends on how you mean "accept."  A Christian church will (or should, but sadly many do not, as Glatisant says) accept them as people, but will not (again, should not) accept their behavior -- LGBTism is in direct conflict with Mosaic law regarding sexuality (which also precludes adultery, incest, and bestiality... think about it). Not trying to start a religious debate here, but "LGBT Christian" is really a contradiction in terms. 70.119.226.163 (talk) 22:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acceptability of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender status 

message: Should this category be divided into subcategories of LGBT Catholics, LGBT Orthodox Christians, LGBT Anglicans, LGBT Mormons, LGBT Protestants, etc? --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 23:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't Cats like LGBT Catholics and LGBT Anglicans be subcats of LGBT Christians? Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 18:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT by grouping..
Talk:Selfish Cunt

message: Since my revert was reverted without comment, let's go through one by one:
*Record label: what is ex.horseglue? is that horseglue records renamed? if not then does that mean they are now unsigned? or with a different label? I am removing that until it can be clarified.
*Band members: I have sourced your updated members list from myspace.
*Basic description: I'm happy to leave out the post-punk revival thing, but i dont get what your problems were with the rest. iv attempted a compromise, hope its ok now.
*They are notorious for...: They are not notorious for outstanding musicianship, its that simple pretty much. If you can find a reliable source which states that they are, then we'll see. The drinking reference is also unsourced and unencyclopaedic.
*lyrics: i have re-added politically-charged and also referred to the sexually graphic lyrics, i feel that both are important.
*"Je ne sais quoi" is clearly not an encyclopaedic term, i hope you can see.
*Neither is asserting that critics suck corporate cock.
*That they play music outstandingly is a matter of your opinion (and, for what its worth, mine too), not an objective fact suitable for an encyclopaedia.
I have tidied up a couple of other loose words. I hope you are content with this version. Please respond on the talk page before reverting again. Jdcooper 23:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits

message: Assessment of music-playing skill can be objective, as it can refer basically to dexterity and muscle memory. Contrast maybe Led Zeppelin, clearly excellent music players, with emotion-based bands with little emphasis on music playing skill, maybe Sum 41. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.128.121.119 (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity of musical skill. 

message: Jdcooper - Horseglue were Selfish Cunt's record label for some singles and their first album - Horseglue have since folded.  Their record label is now LoveHowlMuse, hence my attempt to add the link to the bottom of the page a couple of times, which you've taken out for "linkspam".  Shouldn't this be put back in?  Or should a LoveHowlMuse page be added to Wikipedia and linked from there?  adriantoll 16:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record Label link
Talk:Twice-Told Tales

message: Shouldn't the contents of the stories be moved to WikiSource? WLior 23:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It would be nice to have an encyclopedic article on the collection, though. Midnightdreary 05:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zot

message: ZOT é um precioso rolo de películas bagunçadas, esperando para serem transformadas num Comedy Art!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyvi (talk • contribs) 17:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

message: I've removed the text from this article since Wikipedia is neither a dictionary nor an indiscriminate collection of information. I've turned it back into a redirect since Zot! is the only article to use this name. The removed text is pasted below for reference. PC78 23:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text
Talk:Georges Eekhoud

message: There is dispute about the birthday of Georges Eekhoud. @Swineposit changed the date in the infobox to 27 March 1854, but left 27 May in the opening lines. The Catalan and French Wikipedia give 27 March 1854 as birthday, but all others have 27 May 1854. 27 May seems to be the correct one, as all sources outside Wikipedia (at least, the ones I have seen) state 27 May (such as Encyclopaedia Britannica). If there's evidence that the birtdate should be 27 March, I gladly surrender -but I haven't seen it. Vysotsky (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brithdate
Talk:Rural Municipality of Greenfield No. 529

message: This Rm was added to List of rural municipalities in Saskatchewan by someone else who created the RM list.  As I have added quite a number of RM articles, this is what is available to write about Greenfield No. 529, Saskatchewan, as it was a short lived rural government body until it was absorbed into Mervin No. 499, Saskatchewan.  Until Mervin No. 499, Saskatchewan web article is created, this is valid and referenced information from the Government of Saskatchewan, Country of Canada.
Please explain your vote for deletion.
:The tag was deleted from the article, which wouldn't fall under any speedy criteria anyways. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 01:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kelsall

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) 
Peter I. Vardy 20:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Beeston, Cheshire

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 02:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:Tim Gaines

message: So, what's the deal? Why is Tim Gaines no longer with Stryper? Is it some conflict with Michael? That's the suggestion considering it was Michael who left Stryper and when Robert, Tim and Oz approached him recently to reform the band, Tim left soon after. Any one knows what happened? 
Btw, Tracy Ferrie is fine. Just curious to know why Tim's no longer in.. Dialwon 00:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Is He Not With Stryper? 

message: Tim appeared on my Podcast show June 28th, 2022 and talked about his personal life and his work with Aldo Nova, here is the link: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMED6mf7gBc Vondean01 (talk) 17:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  #8 Timothy Gaines - On The Dean Von Music Podcast Show
Talk:Espiritismo

message: :Hello, does anyone know the difference between Espiritismo and Spiritism ?? 92.128.30.249 (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:The Overachievers

message: "A book ridden with lies and written by a hypocrit." ~ The Black and White Online
A search at www.blackandwhiteonline.net revealed no source for this quote.  In addition, its placement - directly preceding the summary of the book, with no explanation or discussion - was POV and not appropriate within the context of the article.  Hence, I removed it.
Does anyone know which years this book actually takes place during?  July through December of one year is not normally considered 3 semesters.  76.116.245.122 (talk) 23:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the globalize tag, because this is an article about the book, in which the author concentrates on the US, as she is naturally entitled to do. Robina Fox (talk) 13:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize tag