lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/List of notable books

message: What's the point in keeping a progress chart if both columns "initial" and "remaining" are the same? Very confusing what the point of the chart is. -- Stbalbach 01:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what the chart starts out as. As people create book articles, the remaining count diminishes. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Count chart 

message: Surely winners of the Nobel prize count for more than winners of Hugo? This coming from an SF fan! Each Nobel prize winner should have articles on their major works. --MacRusgail 16:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We just do notable or not notable. We don't do comparative notability. We will ideally have an article on anything that is notable. Hope that covers it all. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nobel prize

message: I'd like to see the unverified blue links sections trimmed. Books which have stubs are being listed. I see the purpose of this list as being to create articles, not as being to work on the quality of articles. I presume there is a books project working on infoboxes & quality ... it seems off to seek to drive a quality initiative from a partial list of books. Bottom line, it is not helpful to dilute the purpose of the initiative. So. Once we have verified that a book article, of whatever quality, exists, I think we should remove the blue link. Anyone got a problem with that? Anyone actually read this page? --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unverified blue links sections - proposal to trim

message: Since there're so many notable books (reviewed or awarded, adapted, frequently studied) not found on the "list of notable books", and there're some blue links on the "Missing or needs redirect" section and some red links on the "Unverified blue links" section, we'e better ask more Wikipedians (members of the book or novel WikiProject are perhaps more willing and capable) to organise the list (I've recently organised the 4th and 8th, but it's too tiring for me......) and refresh the figures on the table (it has not been updated since 23:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: We should recruit more Wikipedians to organise the list
Talk:Stické

message: I have found conflicting information about court dimensions.  This reference  states 78 x 27 feet.  But this one  gives 84 x 30 feet.  It is certainly possible that courts were never intended to be identical, so both could be "correct."  — Eoghanacht talk 14:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Court dimensions

message: I read an account, possibly erroneous, that the origin of the name "Sticke" is unclear. It either derives from Sphairistikè (Greek for "playing ball"), the term originally given to lawn tennis by Walter Clopton Wingfield [probably factual], or from a Major-General Sticke, a French Canadian who is credited with inventing the game. — Eoghanacht talk 13:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name origin
Talk:Durham Huskies

message: This is just a start.
I'm looking for Win-Loss-Tie records.  This may be hard considering the team dates back to the 1930s, but any little bit helps. DMighton 14:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

message: :Image:1968 Durham Huskies.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:1968 Durham Huskies.JPG
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/List of TV shows

message: Hello people, I just stumbled onto this page when looking at "what links here" for "Hudson Street," which I created first to redirect to the street Hudson Street (Manhattan). Once I realized that there was a TV show called that exact name I changed it to a disambiguation page with a red link to "Hudson Street (TV show)," which judging from articles about most TV shows with the same name as another article seems to be a standard. I just wanted to let you know that the page Hudson Street is not the TV show, and if someone creates an article for it it should probably go to Hudson Street (TV show). -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 02:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hudson Street 

message: These pages don't seem to receive much attention, so I'm going to start some clean-up on them.  One huge problem is that the lists are alphabetized according to first word, even if the first word is "A" or "The".  It makes it very difficult to find a show without looking in several places.  And makes the list of "T" shows highly inaccurate.  If there is some consensus to fix this, I might be willing to give it a try.  In the meantime, I'll put an additional warning on the main page. JimVC3 (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also cleaning up the list of shows needing infoboxes, carrying over listings from Television articles without infoboxes.  I'm continuing the (I think unwise) practice of including "A" or "The" as part of alphabetizing the shows.  JimVC3 (talk) 23:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning Up Pages
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/List of US Newspapers

message: What is the notiablilty threshold for newpapers?--Rayc 06:35, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: * I propose a new color code for this list: Red represents 0-20% complete; Orange, 20-40%; Yellow, 40-60%; Green, 60-80%; and Blue, 80-100%  How does this sound? Eyeball kid (talk) 23:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Color Code

message: Please see here: WP:WPNEWS
-Pete Forsyth (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New project with more or less the same goal
Talk:Durham Thundercats

message: Just started.
Looking for Win-Loss-Tie Records.  DMighton 14:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Benjamin T. Brockman

message: This material is all from an out-of-print book from a long-dead author.  I don't really see how anyone can have a copyright on re-stating this material and I'm not sure why it was placed on copyrigth violation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brockmanah (talk • contribs) 9:52, 11 January 2006.
:It was marked as a copyright violation as you didn't provide the source and it's a direct match to websites that also don't list the source. As such, it could only be assumed it was from those sites and therefore under copyright. Please remember to sign your talk page contributions. It's also a good idea to use subject headings. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 01:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: This article is not in a format appropriate for a Wikipedia biography article. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies). If you'd like to see some examples of Civil War bio articles, look at the list in User:Hlj. Hal Jespersen 23:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify 

message: The Battle for the Bloody Angle could perhaps more clearly reference the Battle of Spotsylvania Courthouse of which it was a part (right now it looks like the link may just be to an entry about the courthouse).
In the end the Battle for the Bloody Angle deserves its own page or at least its own section - within the Spotsylvania Courthouse Battle page, I mean. (Books have been written about the events of those 23 hours, which prefigured the trench warfare of WWI.)  Once that happens, the current redirect for Battle of the Bloody Angle that points to this page should probably point there.
I may have time to add such a page (or section) in the next few days.
Praghmatic (talk) 16:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bloody Angle 
Talk:Small v. United States

message: So the SCOTUS ruled that a yankee who committed a murder abroad, even if he is caught on CCTV tape doing the crime, is free to purchase firearms back in the USA? How many more people will be murdered because of this?
The ruling is also greatly offensive to all countries of the world outside the USA. No wonder japanese people are now so hateful towards yankee and want the USN sailors out of Japan. Imagine that GI raping japanese schoolgirls go back to USA and parade in full armament on main street... America is losing friends every minute because of unilateralism and arrogance. 195.70.48.242 14:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Offensive ruling
Talk:Evenor

message: The information in this article is wrong. The first king of Atlantis was named "Atlas" according to Plato (Critias 114a-c). That's actually why the island is named Atlantis, because "Atlantìs nésos" (Greek) means "Island of Atlas". --Bender235 14:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Neo-Ricardianism

message: Dear Sirs, 
I would like to collaborate with you. In particular, regarding Neo-Ricardianism I think you are forgetting adding one of the most prominent heir of Sraffa's classical revival, I refer to Pierangelo Garegnani (1930- ), currently professor at The Third University of Rome. Garegnani has not only developed his PhD dissertation with Sraffa, but also has contributed to the work of theoretical reconstruction at the light of both, the clasiccal revival and the shortcomings of the marginalist theory, to develope an alternative theroy of value and distribution.
Andrés Lazzarini
(from Argentine, in Rome)
:Best thing to do is just dive in and add content that you think would benefit the article, and we can figure out here how best to square up each other's view of what should and should not go in the article. --- Charles Stewart 17:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pierangelo Garegnani
Talk:White-tipped dove

message: This doesn't look like the White-tipped Doves I've seen here in S. Texas, USA. The back and wings in this image are much too dark and the body is much too light. The White-tipped Dove's bill is black and the feet are orange. Another clue is the image name, which is White-headed_dove.jpg. Sometimes the White-crowned Pigeon (Patagioenas leucocephala) is call the White-headed Dove but that's not it. The closest thing I could find with a quick search was the  White-headed Pigeon (Columba leucomela) found in Australia. TimWhitehouse 15:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a White-tipped, which I've now seen in Trinidad, and I can't find it in the USFWS image library under either pigeon or dove, jimfbleak 16:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to get an image. Currently they're not coming to my yard but the refuges around here feed them and I can get pretty close. TimWhitehouse 19:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The one in the current image (Whitetippeddove.jpg, uploaded on 8 April 2006 by Tim Whitehouse) is almost exactly the same as those from Paraguay. Thanks. Aldo L (talk) 11:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this image correct?

message: — Assignment last updated by Xinyue Hu (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CMN2160B
Talk:Higher Learning

message: Most of the text on this page is lifted straight from IMDb's plot summary and trivia - unless IMDb's information was lifted straight from Wikipedia. -Etoile 14:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Text lifted from IMDb

message: "According to film critic/historian Roger Ebert, the name of Columbus University is an inside joke. The college is named for Christopher Columbus: a Dead White European Male whose "discovery" of America led to genocide and worse..."
Shouldn't this be changed? I'm not sure how the name of the Univ. qualifies as an inside joke when there are entire scenes that play on the controversial (and in some ways infamous) role that Columbus played in what happened once America was discovered by the Europeans.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by C d h (talk • contribs) 04:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Inside Joke"

message: There seems to be a mix of two different (conflicting? Irrelevant?) ideas: Epps's performance in a parody of '90s movies and something about someone being shot. I haven't seen "Higher Learning", so I don't know if the second sentence relates to Higher Learning or the parody film that Epps starred in. This section needs editing and clarification. DeesEditz (talk) 14:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's up with the Omar Epps Section?
Talk:DIRNSA

message: References the office, not the person.  The person changes, the office remains.  This should redirect to the NSA article, not the current and temporary holder of the office.  Perhaps redirect to National_Security_Agency#Directors, but probably best to the main article; readers who aren't drooling on themselves should be able to find the cogent information. — Kbh3rdtalk 15:02, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

message: good to know. Unsophisticated Discourse Style Mc there was a universal "feeling" 07:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  k thankz
Talk:Richard Hunt

message: Richard Hunt (disambiguation) → Richard Hunt – There is no need for an unwieldy title when the parent article title is just a redirect to it. Jdcooper 15:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*support Jdcooper 15:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wha? Femto 14:29, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

text: People should never need link directly to a disambiguation page in the first place, no matter what's its name. The (disambiguation) qualifier is not mandatory, but it is descriptive and helps define the purpose of the page. Femto 15:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*support Jdcooper 15:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wha? Femto 14:29, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: >> "people are more likely to link to Richard Hunt than the unwieldy disambig page"
:People should never need link directly to a disambiguation page in the first place, no matter what's its name. The (disambiguation) qualifier is not mandatory, but it is descriptive and helps define the purpose of the page. Femto 15:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Daily Me

message: Daily Me is also a newspaper that you "can make on your own". It was made by Eduardo Hauser. This man was born on March 1st 1969 and he is 38 years old. He has 3 kids and lives in Hollywood, FL
----
While Negroponte is certainly the popularizer of the term, it's unclear that he coined it. In Being Digital, Negroponte is talking about a project called "Fishwrap", organized by Pascal Chesnais and Walter Bender, which was an early customizable online newspaper. I've edited to reference Fishwrap and the Chesnais contribution. Ethanz (talk) 22:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Censorship

message: "[Category:Censorship by country]". Also make a template. Skinnyweed 02:06, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Skinnyweed 01:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New category 

message: I moved this back up to the human rights category, censorship is not aways an abuse of human rights. Whizz40 (talk) 09:21, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human rights categroy
Talk:The New Inquisition

message: "those third rate scientists who try to fob off fourth rate garbage as science"? Sounds very POV to me. Is that a direct quote from the book? Then it should have quotation marks. Otherwise it should be deleted. --Hob Gadling 15:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok seriously? Obviously some major grammar issues that you guys should've taken care of when you first saw the article. I mean seriously, this article is like a paragraph, you see something wrong, fix it. --Daniel()Folsom T|C|U 21:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: A lot of this is nonsense, if I can't make any sense of it soon it should be nominated for deletion. That first sentence you mentioned to me doesn't make any sense, but the implied message was clear so I re-phrased it and removed a bit of the POV. Fob off means to decieve, to my knowledge you could "fob off the scientific comunity into believing garbage was science," but you can't "decieve garbarge as science." Maybe it makes sense and I just don't know, maybe it doens't , point is, it's better now. --Daniel()Folsom T|C|U 22:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Picking the best one of the three has problems - how do you decide which is "best"? Besides, what is the problem with having reviews from skeptics? As long as the reviews deal with the book, there should be no problem.Autarch (talk) 20:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: One of the references has a problem - it reads Schrödinger, chapter 23 - this could be the Schrödinger's Cat trilogy or something else - could someone fix this? Autarch (talk) 20:09, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference problem 

message: There are two reviews in the Reception section - more would be nice. I found a copy of Brian Sianos review, but as it's in a Usenet posting, it probably fails WP:RS - does anybody know if a copy exists on the site of the publication it was originally in? There's no sign of it at his site.Autarch (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: The New Inquisition is also the title of an important 1939 book by Konrad Heiden where he exposed Germany's plans for the Shoah.--87.228.188.179 (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig? 

message: MarshallKe (talk) 22:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:2005 World Series of Poker

message: How could David Sklansky be eliminated both day 1 and day 2? bbx 15:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He was eliminated on Day 2 (see Card Player's live update log. I have updated the page, although it does need to be severely trimmed at some stage. Essexmutant 16:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double David
Talk:Glenn Ligon

message: I am unsure of the copyright status of a publically displayed work of art. Info? Poisonouslizzie 15:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed the :Category:Gay artists again.  In order for that cat to be there (per WP:BLP), there must be a reference. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 22:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NYT article below states plainly that he is gay.  postdlf (talk) 04:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay artist 

message: .  postdlf (talk) 04:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source for expansion, sourcing 
Talk:Meme/Archive 3

message: Does anybody have any specific cleanup related issues with this article?  The cleanup template is generally used for neglected articles that have e.g. formatting problems or bad prose, which doesn't seem to be the case here.  Cleanup generally isn't used for issues of neutrality or incompleteness.  I am removing it from the page as it was originally inappropriately added on an issue of neutrality.  --Joe D (t) 15:27, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Pozzolana

message: if there is something worthy --> merge --Melaen 16:02, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content from article [[Pozzulana]] 

message: Please, only edit the central page dealing with Pozzolanic reaction which has been transcluded in this page. See Wikipedia:Transclusion to learn how it works. Thank you. Shinkolobwe (talk) 13:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pozzolanic reaction <small><small>[[Pozzolanic reaction|| main article |]]</small></small>

message: Is this duplicate of Pozzolan? --Argo Navis (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pozzolan]]?
Talk:Mohammed Awzal

message: This is clearly an incomplete stub, but as complete as I could make it using Google. There just isn't more English-language or easily translatable information on Awzal on the Web right now. Someone wanting to expand this article would need to either refer to printed material (the Boogert would probably be a good start), or find a Tashelhiyt search engine or both. GRuban 16:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Otherwise, you can also look for someone capable to transalte from Italian the corresponding article. Moreover, pay attention: despite the title, the first reference does not link to a poem by Awzal, but to some sayings of Sidi Hêmmu u Ttalb, another Moroccan poet who has nothing to do with Awzal. --Vermondo 06:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Che Kung Temple

message: The temple is never known as its pinyin name  -- Jerry Crimson Mann 16:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pinyin name
Template talk:Olympic Winter Games Host Cities

message: I like the template, but I was wondering if we could make it more compact (less white space) and more symmetrical. For example, I think it might make more sense to use the short version of the names, e.g., "Chamonix" and "Oslo" rather than "Chamonix, France" and "Oslo, Norway." Also, the logo and title appear lopsided. --Leifern 16:06, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look now, and see what you think.  It's been condensed quite a bit, but the top is still giving me some difficulty. — ArkansasTraveler 16:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cosmetics 

message: Template:Olympic Winter Games Host Cities has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Olympic Winter Games Host Cities. Thank you. Flowerparty■ 00:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The result of the debate was keep. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 23. -Splashtalk 01:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:Olympic Winter Games Host Cities 

message: To have a more consistent look, I'd prefer the version with the Dynamic navigation box (). Are there any improvements that version could use? Otherwise, I'd reactivate it.  -- User:Docu
:I, too, like the dynamic box. Make sure that if you change it back, you also make sure the summer host cities template has the dynamic box, too. → J@red  19:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dynamic template

message: Why there is the city "Erzurum" (2011) in box? As I know exectly, it isn't an Olimpic city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Жабыш (talk • contribs) 14:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erzurum
Talk:Coryat's Crudities

message: 'Frequently isolated Britain'. But that's probably a misconception. The generation which had the UK staying out of the Thirty Years' War, and the Cromwell period: yes, that was an introspective time. But you can't say that for the rest of the Stuarts, William-and-Mary, the Hanoverians. In some ways there was a parochial culture, but in other ways not. Charles Matthews 16:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wonder why no one has bothered to explain the meaning of the title. Crudities seems to be the same as crudités, i.e. raw vegetables. Am I right?--78.157.85.5 (talk) 17:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite - the Oxford English Dictionary explains. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title explanation 

message: Noel Malcolm says 56 rather than 55, and he's usually right. Perish the suggestion we should count ... Charles Matthews (talk) 20:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of verses