lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pretty Little Picture

message: I've had to put the article on hold, the following needs to be done-
*Use the correct  template for refs.
*Find some web references to back up the statements.
*Use  or  for these.
*Remove the notes/trivia section ASAP and merge any noteable and sourceable content into an appropriate section of the article.
*Delete the ejaculation note, this fails WP:POV.
*All fair-use images should have the correct summary on the image page, see [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Applogo.JPG|here] for an example.
*Delete all dead wikilinks.
*Find sources for-
**International Titles
**Title reference
*A "reception" section must be added. Include sourced ratings of the episode from different newspapers/noteable websites and possibly quotes. Some The Simpsons episodes have recieved GA or FA status when quoting the user scores from TV.com and IMDb. Although, this is not reccomended.
*Change ""Pretty Little Picture" is the 3rd episode of the ABC television series, Desperate Housewives. The episode was the third episode for the show's first season." to ""Pretty Little Picture" is the 3rd episode of the first season of ABC television series, Desperate Housewives." This reads better.
*Copy the Quotes section to a new page on Wikiquote, linking it from this article.
Good luck. You may want to strike through completed tasks by using . Dalejenkins 13:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now failed this article. Dalejenkins 15:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA

message: Unfortunately naming a TV episode after a well known Broadway song doesn't make the TV episode the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over and against the meaning found in books, sorry. WP:CRITERIA also applies here. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved
Talk:Siemens Energy Sector

message: I work here and my statements are accurate...
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmahoney1978 (talk • contribs) 02:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Please provide sources to establish the subject's notability. Of course, the need for sources goes beyond notability. Information added to an article must be verifiable, and facts included must be attributed to a reliable source. Please also see Wikipedia's guidelines on conflicts of interest. Thanks. --Evb-wiki 02:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: SPGI is now SEI (Siemens Energy Inc.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.10.165.118 (talk) 19:37, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: SPGI

message: I don't think that this is the same company!  --House1630 (talk) 22:06, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  German version 

message: Siemens Energy has re-organized its division set-up. I have deleted the affected  sections from the article. 
Sie energy (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Solar division 

message: Markus Tacke is new Wind CEO. I have updated the page accordingly. 
http://www.siemens.com/press//en/pressrelease/?press=/en/pressrelease/2013/energy/E201307043.htm Sie energy (talk) 09:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New CEO Wind Divsion 

message: I have added a number of secondary sources as references for the Acquisitions & Partners section. Sie energy (talk) 09:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary sources as references 

message: Hello, I have just updated the article with the latest figures for employees and revenue. Best regards, Sie energy (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of fiscal year 
Talk:List of retired pricing games from The Price Is Right

message: I say keep the individual articles. --Jnelson09 02:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um...that's nice.  Why? -TPIRFanSteve 04:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As opposed to merging them. It just said to discuss it here. --Jnelson09 05:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just stating what you want without providing any reasoning does not qualify as "discussion." -TPIRFanSteve 15:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. OK, I know this is not considered a good argument, but keeping the individual pages would reduce clutter on the list page, for one thing. --Jnelson09 20:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't Merge cause Merged there would short description separate you could actually explain the Pricing Game.--Hornetman16 16:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The whole idea behind creating individual articles was to keep the list article(s) — retired and active games alike — short. [[Briguy52748 01:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Uh, there already is a category like that. [[Briguy52748 01:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Since we have merged all of the individual articles into this one, shouldn't we now redirect those articles here? --WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as this is NOT a merging of articles. Most articles have much more information in them than is presented in this list. This list is merely a summary of that information. TheHYPO 10:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a little question 

message: Since there has been no consensus of any kind since July, can we take the proposed-merge templates off the individual articles? TheHYPO 20:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the problem. No consensus, no agreement, no removing. I mean, there seems to be predominant sentiment towards keeping them, but nothing official. --Jnelson09 03:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

text: If there is no consensus to merge, shouldn't the default be to not merge? How many months have to go by before the templates can be cut? TheHYPO 05:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, as there's nothing official, nothing completely legit can be done. I mean, we could remove the templates and see what happens, but like I said, it's not legit. --Jnelson09 02:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With Jnelson09's remarks in mind, perhaps the "how long before a 'merge' template is removed" argument should go to a new discussion page. It's a good argument and one I've often pondered. [[Briguy52748 19:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results of Merge? 

message: It makes more sense for each game to have its own article, and a summary is unnecessary, since there is a template that shows all the retired games.  Mrath 05:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to keep individual articles
Talk:European Food Safety Authority

message: See also Special Report No 15/2012 – Management of conflict of interest in selected EU Agencies--Lamiot (talk) 14:05, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: to improve the content of this article and the update, see also: 
Talk:European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

message: A map showing the EU member nations is used in this article. It should be concidered to change this map to EU+EFTA member map, since the EFTA members also are included in this centre. 
Andre1980 (talk) 21:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong map used in this article

message: See https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/13a83657-97b6-4a80-aa32-3b335bdf80be or doesn't it? I'm not too profound with that organization. --Rabenkind (talk) 10:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a bit hard to tell from that document, but you may be right. Sadly the History section (as well as just about the entire rest of the article) has no sources, so we don't know where that conflicting information came from. -- Fyrael (talk) 14:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History seems to have started way earlier 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cbrownaz24 (talk) 06:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Legal Europe
Talk:European GNSS Agency

message: In favor. EUSPA is a direct successor with an expanded mandate, and stays in the same place while replacing the GSA.
--Gaxtrope (talk) 09:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with European Agency for the Space Programme
Talk:European Fisheries Control Agency

message: : Copied from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spain#Duplication_of_articles_-_European_Fisheries_Agency_and_Community_Fisheries_Agency,
: by Trafford09 (talk) 00:13, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of  articles  - European Fisheries Agency and Community Fisheries Agency 
Talk:Food booth

message: Please clarify notes and references for verification, esp. note #3. Thanks! --Busy Stubber 02:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes and references

message: If the following topics are important to understanding this topic, please condsider integrating them into the text of the article with appropriate wikilinks to these related topics and supporting text. --Busy Stubber 02:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also
Talk:European Institute for Gender Equality

message: Hi, I'm :it:User:Silvia bruni1,  librarian at the University of Florence (Social science library). We organised a Wikipedia course. Erasmus students improved some Wikipedia article about the European Union.  Friederike Hils worked on this article. Silvia bruni1 (talk) 09:37, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements
Talk:European Union Satellite Centre

message: Is there a source of information about EUSC that discusses it in relation to ESA? Doe the two organizations communicate/interact with each other at all? (sdsds - talk) 18:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: EUSC is an EU agency, which ESA is not, although membership largely overlaps. EUSC works within the defence & security area, while ESA is essentially civilian. Tomas e (talk) 09:01, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to ESA
Talk:Eurojust

message: I've marked the page as using close paraphrasing, specifically in the history section, based on this page, but other sections may closely paraphrase from other sources. Paris1127 (talk) 06:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close Paraphrasing 
Talk:Ovarian artery

message: Why is there a picture here that shows the ovaries, but with no ovarian artery marked? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.48.95.71 (talk • contribs) 04:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current image and diagram both label the ovarian artery. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 20:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Of Grammatology

message: I'm not a Derrida scholar, but I think it's pretty egregious that this page doesn't exist yet. So... I'll take a stab at at and hope that more qualified people can fix things up. Superabo 03:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Older comments

message: "Derrida does not claim to be giving a critique of the work of these thinkers, because he does not believe it possible to escape from operating with such oppositions."
Is this, in anyone's opinion, a sentence that makes sense?128.90.113.23 (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: For which degree would Of Grammatology have been submitted? The Peeters biography says this at p. 166: "Jean Hyppolite and Maurice de Gandillac were encouraging him to present Of Grammatology as a thèse de troisième cycle, which could then be transformed into a thèse complémentaire. This was a tempting proposal, since it was a task from which he would thus be freed on the day he defended his thèse principale."
Perhaps this section could be expanded or better explained?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.69.66 (talk) 00:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background Clarification 

message: "Derrida 1997" is useless as a refference given how thick "Of grammatology" is.Dejvid (talk) 20:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: References inadaquate
Talk:1995 Stanley Cup Finals

message: I'm not going to change it, but it was not a breakaway when Stevens through that hit. A breakaway is when a player is 1 on 0 vs. the goalie. Niedermayer was in front of Kozlov, and then Stevens came in from the side. I think that warrants a change.
Alslammerz 14 March 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.43.133 (talk) 03:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording on Game 2 Entry

message: I have an issue with the statement "New Jersey had shocked everyone in the hockey world by winning the first two games of the Stanley Cup Finals in Detroit."  I don't think it's verifiable as written and it strikes me as non-neutral.   Also, the article contradicts itself in a few places regarding the final scores of games 1 and 2.  Rejectwater (talk) 23:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shocking
Talk:List of number-one singles of 1965 (Canada)

message: Some of the RPM online archives had been indexed with the months and dates exchanged, therefore it was more reliable to look at the volume/issue number for the top singles list. A few issues are also missing and may require a visit to LAC or other library with the RPM issues from 1965 to fill those in. #1 singles tended to completely disappear from the chart after a new #1 is announced - there may be a case or two where the single dropped to #2, but a slow decline of a single after a #1 peak was not commonly seen (otherwise it might have been easier to infer the #1s for the missing weeks). Dl2000 03:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes on the initial list
Talk:List of educational institutes in Jamshedpur

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 

message: The Institutes should be listed in a table format with sections having name, address, type and courses/subjects/affliation, at the very least.
Itsmesid (talk) 13:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve Listings of Institute Names
Talk:Layer cake (food)

message: I think it makes more sense to have the article at Layer cake, its much more familiar to the general public than the other senses. Kappa 03:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have to agree, feel free to post this at Wikipedia:Requested moves for further consideration if you would like.  Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Barbara Ramsay Shaw

message: She was in cover of July 1966 edition of Playboy? At least the link from 'List of people in Playboy 1960–1969' comes at this article. 85.217.23.95 (talk) 02:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed the link there to "Barbara Shaw (model)" so it won't came here anymore. 85.217.34.29 (talk) 22:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Helloarise

message: My user account was created only on 1st July 2007.Earlier I was using IP address for my edits.To accuse me of sockpuppeting is strange.There is no vandalising in Bakasuprman edits entire sections of Periyar which are cited from reliable sources. go away sections relating Vaikom Satyagraha ,Dravidar Kazhagam 1944 - till death, part of biography which states that the government of Tamil Nadu refers to him as Periyar 
As the edit below shows the user wants to do editing based on his personal views
*22:19, 27 June 2007  remove even cited sections as he sees them as rm namecruft and anti-Brahmin rhetoric.Brahmin is a caste.I put NPOV and asked for a India expert .
Earlier I had asked for page protection as I did not want the edit war or vandalism to continue.I aslo took up the issue in 3RR but they said no and as I said there that I would create an account .I created one.No one who wants vandalise pages will ask for protection.I do not know users Anwar Sadat with whom he has longstanding edit wars and Gabbaelephant has done editing for just one day 27th june .Yes used my account today without signing in from 81.208.166.87  before creating the account I have used it.I rest my case there.Further these IP address are public ones and I am not the only person using it.
Further Bakasuprman has been blocked before for edit warring and faces an arbitation case  Helloarise 05:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I have confirmation that  = . See  the IP edited this exact page (refer to page history).Bakaman 16:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dragonbane

message: I can't find a single picutre or eyewitness account of the 20-ton dragon described. Is this a hoax that someone has pulled over on Wiki? This needs documentation, IMHO.
: It's not a hoax. Here's a photo: http://www.dragonbane.org/midcom-serveattachmentguid-370f06a97588149b1a88002230b6408f/dragon-on-the-road Although some of statements in the article seem exaggerated. 350 players makes for a medium-sized Swedish LARP. 1000+ player LARPs are not unusual, including ones with villages built for the occasion. Apart from the dragon, Dragonbane's chief claim to notoriety comes from the fact that it was marketed internationally and played in English, thereby bringing together players from many different traditions and affecting the LARP discussions in several countries.  --Bård Lordemort 08:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Desire of Ages

message: I was contacted by a reference librarian at the Library of Congress. She asked me if I could delete the sentence:
:The Desire of Ages was acclaimed by the United States Library of Congress in the 1950s as the most sought after book on the life of Christ.
She said that the Library does not endorse books at all and never did. So this sentence should be taken out because it's not true. I didn't want to simply remove it without an explanation. Please advise. --FeanorStar7 (talk) 23:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for passing that on – I have removed the sentence in question. A questionable statement like that needs a reference, per the official Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:Verifiability. Of course, one had not been given. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: Summarize 210.213.213.28 (talk) 01:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  God with us 

message: EL EL triumfo DE el amorde Dios 50.232.174.186 (talk) 13:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book
Talk:1st Marine Expeditionary Brigade (United States)

message: The Marines may be clearly awesome and perhaps everyone should be informed of this, but Wikipedia isn't the place to share such things. This article needs to be put in neutral language and should not promote or boast its subject. --Nogburt (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral Language
Talk:In Between Days (film)

message: A disambiguation page has to be made for this and the song "In Between Days" by The Cure. Right now the search page, when one searches for "In Between Days," loads the song's page directly.
Michaeljancsy 04:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a template to the song article.--Crossmr (talk) 03:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Category talk:Tribes of Arabia

message: there was 380 arabian tribe before islam
I will give the names of arab tribes in arabic so you can wtiting about it
القساملة
قحطان
هوازن
عدنان
الأوس
الخزرج
كهلان
تنوخ
غسان
العتق
حاشد
حمير
سيبان
خراعة
ذبيان
الازد
غامد
غطفان
عبد مناف 
حضرموت
مقنعم
زبيد
قضاعة
عفار
مذحج
همدان
ربيعة
العوازم
خولان 
قريش 
المهرة 
طيء
جهينة
النمر
أكلب
شبيعة
بنو لخم (المناذرة)
بني الحندق
بنو النجار
بنو الليث
بنو العنبر
بنو الاشعر
بنو العنبس
بنو العتيك
بنو ساعدة
بنو الأرقم
بنو الاسلم
بنو أسد
بنو الأشعر 
بنو زيد
بنو جذام
بنو الأشعر
بنو الحارث
بنو النخع
بنو الحتات
بنو تميم
بنو إبراهيم
بنو الحصن
بنو بجلة
بنو باهلة
بنو جديد
بنو زمان
بنو حرب (الحجازية)
بنو حرب (اليمنية)
بنو كلاب
بنو كعب
بنو كلب
بنو مرة
بنو عوف
بنو هلال (الحجازية)
بنو هلال (حضرموت)
بنو هذيل
بنو حنظلة
بنو ثعلبة 
بنو يشكر
بنو عجل
بنو كنانة
بنو كندة
بنو مزينة
بنو مرداس
بنو ناجية
بنو أمية 
بنو نهد
بنو نمير
بنو سعد
بنو سامة
بنو سهم
بنو رفاعة
بنو راسب
بنو شيبان
بنو ثقيف
بنو نصر
بنو هود
بنو هشام‏
بنو هميم‏
بنو هناة‏
بنو وهيب‏
بنو ياس‏
بنو حراص‏
بنو عصية 
بنو عزيز 
بنو عدي 
بنو عدسة 
بنو عجل (كهلانية القحطانية)
بنو عثمان 
بنو عتبة 
بنو عفير
بنو عكرمة (القحطانية)
بنو عكرمة (  بكر بن وائل )
بنو علي 
بنو عمرو 
بنو عمران 
بنو غالب 
بنو فضالة 
بنو قصي 
بنو كريم 
بنو كنانة 
بنو مازن 
بنو محمد 
بنو محرمة 
بنو مسلمة 
بنو مصعب 
بنو شيبة
بنو شيطان 
بنو صالح 
بنو طلحة 
بنو ظالم 
بنو ظفير 
بنو جشم‏
بنو الجلندي
بنو اسماعيل‏
بنو أخزم‏
بنو غافر‏
بنو محارب‏
بنو سليمة‏
بنو دهمان‏
بنو خالد‏
بنو طرف
بنو حسّان‏
بنو حسن‏
بنو طريف
بنو عاملة
بنو أشجع 
بنو أعصر 
بني لام
بنو عائد 
بنو سحيم 
بنو سلمان 
بنو سلول 
بنو سنان 
بنو سلامان 
بنو شاكر 
بنو شبل 
بنو شجرة 
بنو شريك 
بنو شعبة 
بنو شقرة 
بنو راشد 
بنو حدان 
بنو حذافة 
بنو حنظلة 
بنو خثعمة 
بنو خشين 
بنو دغنة 
بنو جابر 
بنو جاسم 
بنو جهضم 
بنو تيم 
بنو يقطفة 
بنو يذكر 
بنو يحيى 
بنو غني 
بنو فهم 
بنو محارب 
بنو سليم
بنو عامر 
بنو جعدة
بنو جرم 
بنو ضبة 
بنو عذرة
بنو اسحاق 
بنو اسيد 
بنو الحجر 
بنو الحكم 
بنو الغوث 
بنو المعافر 
بنو المعلى 
بنو النمر 
بنو الهجيم 
بنو أوس 
بنو الأخيل 
بنو الأملوك 
بنو أيوب 
بنو عبد القيس 
بني مالك
بني غانم
بني عقيل
بني مخزوم
بني عبس 
بني عُضل
بني القبر
بني مدلج
بكر بن وائل
تغلب بن وائل
عنز بن وائل  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.35.121 (talk) 17:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: unsigned item from 2007
Talk:Zappa–Szép product

message: This article should probably just be moved into the product of subgroups article.  The articles of Zappa and Szep are five and fifteen years after a similar article by Miller.  The product of subgroups goes back to at least Burnside, but one could possibly give Miller credit for the first systematic study of the property in the abstract.  Certainly factorization results are a staple of modern group theory with Hall's Sylow systems and Thompson's factorization of p-solvable groups being high points. JackSchmidt 04:13, 5 July 2007
Actually, there is a second extra condition that the subgroups intersect trivially, so perhaps giving it a name is not a bad idea.  Instead of merging this article, I think the product of subgroups article should be expanded to survey the various products, since the individual articles do not do a good job of this.  In the meantime, I expanded the examples section with Miller's and Hall's work.  Since Thompson's factorization results usually have a normal subgroup as part of the decomposition and rarely have trivial pairwise intersection, I removed them from this article. JackSchmidt 13:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Sara Blakely

message: To my knowledge, American law schools do not have entrance exams.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.222.87 (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed the Entrance Exam to Law School 

message: "she moved to Atlanta, researching and then agreeing production run deals with local manufacturers."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.69.21 (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone fix this 

message: There is a great picture of Sara Blakely here:  "Tuesday’s event to celebrate Time Magazine’s 100 Most Influential People in the World issue was packed with moguls, leaders and newsmakers including Jeremy Lin, Timothy Cardinal Dolan, Twitter’s Jack Dorsey, Harvey Weinstein, and Rihanna — but it was Blakely whom Abedin, wife of Anthony Weiner, most wanted to meet before she and Clinton left the Time Warner Center. An event organizer was dispatched to Blakely’s table to ask her to come over, and the Spanx sensation was soon seen in deep conversation with Clinton." — FYI, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 12:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sara Blakely attends the Time magazine 100 influential people awards 

message: Too much reliance on a single primary source ("Inc2012") of the subject's own firsthand account of her life -- either the excess details should be trimmed, or additional secondary sourcing to back up her account. Laval (talk) 12:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Career section needs additional sourcing

message: Hello I was wondering do you still helps out because I really need eedd it 104.176.252.37 (talk) 13:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello 

message: The article given as the source in footnote 9 - I read the transcript of the video, which is also in the article. It does not mention the 'fact' about giving people a cheque if they would go to shops and ask for Spanx. No mention of it at all. 82.71.44.128 (talk) 16:36, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote 9