lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A7 road (Great Britain)

message: We have :File:North Bridge - geograph.org.uk - 3498161.jpg this image showing the start of A7 in Edinburgh. Keith D (talk) 20:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Edinburgh image

message: There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways#Major junctions debate yet again that may affect the content of this article. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 10:16, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, please note that I have reduced the amount of major junctions on this article, down from 12 to 7. Roads4117 (talk) 19:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Matthewshill has reduced the major junctions to 4.  Roads4117 (talk) 19:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Roads4117 You're welcome to increase it back to 7. Matthewshill (talk) 19:57, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Matthewshill keep it at four; as Imzadi1979 told me this week that an infobox is basically a summary of the article, so you should get below ten articles on an infobox. Thanks,  Roads4117 (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Matthewshill for creating that junction table. It looks fantastic.  Roads4117 (talk) 20:44, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junctions debate
Talk:Cold Creek Manor

message: This article completely spoils the movie. There should bea spoiler warning before the main paragraph, so that you don't ruin the movie for anyone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clockworkorange22 (talk • contribs) 09:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whatever happened to the spoiler warnings? 
Talk:Roach clip

message: This article demonstrates that there is no such thing as a  "roach clip" (save for that novelty item listed at the end as an aside), just everyday household objects (most of which have their own entries) that are used to hold roaches. But the fact that I have used a phone book for a doorstop does not mean that phone books should be listed in the "doorstop" article. There are plenty of things put to uses their designers did not intend (CDs as hanging ornaments, store receipts as bookmarks, shoe heels as hammers, glass bottles as rolling pins, &c) and they're not singled out for wikification. 165.91.64.125 (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I kind to have to agree.  Does this mean I have paraphernalia in my soldering kit? eg. "aligator clips".  Some might call them roach clips.  66.114.93.6 (talk) 12:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: is this article really necessary?

message: According to the Amish clip article, it's a type of roach clip. 
I thought it would fit as a section or paragraph in this article.
<BR>ColtsScore 00:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[Amish clip]] into this article 

message: The result of the discussion was to keep. Bearian 23:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roach clip]] 

message: I was once shown in a lab working with insects that a "roach clip" was the thing they use to mount cockroaches, in that the clip was designed for this purpose not to damage the cockroach being held in place.  Those things could have gotten onto the streets, and perhaps that's where the name "roach clip", and thus a "joint" turning into a "roach" come from.  After all, why didn't it be called a "joint clip"?  66.114.93.6 (talk) 20:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  cockroach clip/holder 

message: In the early 1980s (and possibly the late '70s), alligator clips attached to leather straps adorned with glass beads and feathers used to be worn in girls' hair or clipped onto a Fedora.  This fashion statement was apparently a way to disguise a roach clip, which I (and probably a number of other people) didn't realize at the time.  I want to put this in the article, but I can't remember what, if anything, this particular version of the device is called.  (I also had at least one source to cite, which I seem to have misplaced.) B7T (talk) 09:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  hair/hat decoration
Talk:Charles de Salaberry

message: You have got wron picture. This is the other de Salaberry. See pl:Charles de Salaberry or fr:Charles de Salaberry Jonasz.
:note that the photograph there now is correct - it is actually a photo of an engraving. Please note also that the image on the pl wiki is almost certainly not right.  C-M d'I de S. died in the pre-photographic era. I believe that the very first crude photographs date to ~1837. Fawcett5 03:35, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This picture is right. The picture on the pl wiki is Charles-Rene-Leonidas d’Irumberry de Salaberry, the son of Charle-Michel d'Irumbrerry de Salaberry. --BarLaf 18:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: "Charles-Michel's father ...  had served as a member died legislative council of Lower Canada for 30 years."
What should this be?  simply omit the word 'died'?  modify it to "had served and died as a member"? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  obscure sentence 

message: Any sources stating whether he was promoted beyond Lieutenant-Colonel?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AloysiusZimmerfloss (talk • contribs) 04:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Major General?

message: nothing said in the article, but wasn't Salaberry from a noble Basque family? like how someone can be from a noble French family.
Maybe good if the article (like the French wiki) could mention something about Salaberry's basqueness.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:21B:D600:226:8FF:FEDC:FD74 (talk) 22:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles de Salaberry of Basque background?
Talk:Banbury mutiny

message: How can it have been the "British" New Model Army when it was established under the laws of the English Republic? Although England abolished the monarchy, Scotland immediately crowned the son of Charles I king! So when Charles II was in exile he was King of Scotland. MPLX/MH 17:12, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: William Thompson's brother, Corporal Perkins and John Church were shot, not hanged, I believe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.187.69.20 (talk) 20:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Thompson's brother, Corporal Perkins and John Church  

message: At some point mention should be made of pamphlet The Levllers (falsly so called) vindicated "or the case of the twelve Troops (which by Treachery in a Treaty) was lately surprised, and defeated at Burford, truly stated, and offered to the Judgement of all unbyassed, and wel-minded People, especially of the Army, their fellow
Souldiers, under the Conduct of the Lord Fairfax. ...Signed at London this 20 of August 1649". --PBS (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Levellers (Falsly so called) vindicated
Talk:173 (number)

message: In my opinion, the number of years it takes water in a lake to be "changed" is interesting.
But the amount of Google hits a person or concept gets is not only uninteresting, but also ephemeral. 173 might get 22 million hits today, 20 million hits next year and 24 million hits a couple of years from now. I can't even think up who could possibly be interested by this ephemerum. Anton Mravcek 17:20, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for removing Google "trivium"
Talk:Classification of the Indigenous languages of the Americas

message: I think that the previous classifications of Native American languages is interesting. It is important to be aware of because many authors (esp. of less scholarly material) do not use the most current classification scheme (which is in Goddard 1996, Cambell 1997, & Mithun 1999).
Maybe someone else is interested in this. Please enjoy. — ishwar  (SPEAK) 17:33, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
Thank you!80.186.84.191 (talk) 09:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is Campbell 1997?Maunus 14:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  sure, we can add it. For N. America, he doesnt differ much from Goddard & Mithun; for S. America, he pretty much follows Kaufman (although there are more exceptions here); for Mesoamerica, I dont really know who to compare him with (but i'm sure that you know...). – ishwar  (speak) 15:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: purpose

message: I've added the Proposals, Linguistic areas, and Theories sections, all of which I've based off Campbell's 1997 book (American Indian Languages). — Stevey7788 (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just moved the new sections to Indigenous languages of the Americas. — Stevey7788 (talk) 06:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sections / Major expansion
Talk:Earl of Craven

message: The current earl (9th) does not seem to have a son nor any child or heir, according to my sources (thepeerage.com & www3.dcs.hull.ac.uk/genealogy/royal/). --VM 18:03, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While I was looking into the origins of the Craven Scholarship at Oxford University, I discovered that there was an earlier Baron Craven.  John Craven (1610-06-10-c.1650) was created by king Charles the first 21 March 1642 baron Craven of Ryton in the county of Salop, which title (Lord Craven of Ryton ) became extinct at his death. His father Sir William Craven was Lord Mayor of London in 1610. See Lord Mayors of London. For my search details, see Talk:John Charles Ryle. DFH 13:39, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An earlier Baron Craven 

message: I was reading your comments on the lineage of the Earls of Craven...I am in fact the mother of the illegitimate son of the 7th Earl my son although illegitimate was recognized and registered by his father whom I lived with as his common law wife...my son is Thomas Roderick Craven not Nicholson and was registered by his father in Brighton where we lived at the time of his birth when not at Hamstead Marshall....and my name Nicolson has no H...thank you in anticipation of you amending your records which are offensive to my son....Anne Nicolson  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.64.86 (talk) 09:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas 7th Earl of Craven 

message: We have the arms of the Earl of Craven at top and bottom.  The top shows the standard comital coronet.  Neither shows the chapeau, crest, supporters, or motto.  Can anyone help?  At the least, the second illustration should be deleted. J S Ayer (talk) 03:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of Arms
Talk:Crescent Nebula

message: Talk:NGC 6888 − NGC 6888 → Crescent Nebula — since Crescent Nebula is the popular name. 132.205.15.43 18:05, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: What is the dark spot near the center?  Enquiring minds want to know. Mcswell (talk) 18:42, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  dark spot 
Talk:Trigraph (orthography)

message: It seems debatable if a diphthong is one sound. By IPA rules they are indicated by two symbols. So the mentioned trigraph "igh" is not a good example. It does not use three letters to represent one sound−Woodstone 18:07, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
:It is one sound phonologically, just as an affricate is. It's arguable whether ay for /ai/ or tš for /tʃ/ are digraphs (I don't know whether they technically count or not), but ie for /ai/ and ch for /tʃ/ do count. The same thing applies for trigraphs. You might want to argue that igh is the vowel i followed by a silent gh, but since night is not pronounced nit, I don't know if this is viable. kwami (talk) 23:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diphthongs 

message: Is 'scratch' a trigraph?  The 'scr' being the possible trigraph.  What about the 'tch' at the end is that one too?
"Scr" is one sound but 3 phonemes, so I don't THINK that would work, but I'm no linguist.  I do think the "tch" would work.
:—Cameron Nedland
:Agreed. A trigraph is not analyzable. scr /skr/ = s /s/ + c /k/ + r /r/. But you can't analyze tch as t + c + h or even t + ch. kwami (talk) 23:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why can't you can analyze "tch" as "t + ch"? 71.174.188.111 (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scr, Tch 

message: If no one objects, I'm thinking about making a Quadragrph article.Cameron Nedland 02:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quadragraph 

message: Digraphs and trigraphs are quite common, but do you know of any tetragraphs in any languages?? Georgia guy 01:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In French there are lots of tetragraphs, caused by verb endings. In ils disent (they say) the ent is silent, forming a tretragraph sent representing [z]. In the past tense this becomes ils disaient where the pentagraph aient is pronounced . −Woodstone 10:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's better analyzed as a series of silent letters. You don't spell /zut/ "sentout". There are so few tetragraphs and pentagraphs, however, that it may be best to cover them here. kwami (talk) 23:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tetragraphs?? 

message: Swahili ng' is considered a digraph or a trigraph? Why it isn't neither in digraph nor in trigraph articles? --81.38.182.40 (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it to the template under trigraph. However, please correct me if I'm wrong: since the apostrophe is not a letter in Swahili (unlike, say, Hawaiian), I don't think ng’ is technically a trigraph. But I'm not going to worry about it for now. kwami (talk) 23:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swahili ng' 

message: is also Swedish, same value as in German. 92.224.97.92 (talk) 16:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sch 

message: Juǀʼhoansi 
:ds’ ts’ dšh tšh dš’ tš’ kx’ tx’
:was used in the 1975 orthography of Juǀʼhoansi for .
:’gh ds’ ts’ djh tjh dj’ tj’ tg’ tsg djg tjg dch c’h nch dcg cg’ dqh q’h nqh dqg cq’ dçh ç’h nçh dçg çg’ x’h nxh dxg cx’
:was used in the 1987 orthography of Juǀʼhoansi for .
:dsh tsh dch tch dzx tsx djx tcx aqn oqn
:(1994)
— kwami (talk) 12:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  to do
Talk:Astrid Benöhr

message: She just holds the world records for women. 
73:18:16	Emmanuel Conraux (FRA)	Monterrey (MEX), 2005
http://www.triathlonweb.nl/dutch/records.htm (talk) 19:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just women record holder 
Talk:Bothrops lanceolatus

message: Another approach would be to make "Fer-de-lance" a disambiguation page and discuss B. lanceolatus at "Martinique lancehead".  Anyway, I hope someone will correct anything I got wrong and especially add some information about this species.  —JerryFriedman 18:15, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of campaign settings

message: Might it be alright to insert Polaqu in here? →mathx314(talk)(email) 18:17, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm about to go to sleep, but have gone through and cleaned up the red links from this page.  Yes, this is a quick and dirty job; I hope the rpg.net and rpgnow.com links I put in place are fairly permanent and don't give us 404s a few years down the road.
I'm also removing homebrews since these are notorious to being started with great fanfare then going nowhere; the only homebrew that looks complete enough to consider keeping here is http://www.thekyngdoms.com/.  
I'll finish up the fantasy section tomorrow.
I'm an inclusionist, not a deletionist, but for info to stay here it has to be something that can quickly get someone to more information about the complete campaign setting in question.  Samboy (talk) 05:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've cleaned up redlinks in the Fantasy section and removed homebrews.  My rule of thumb is that, for something to be listed here, it has to be a campaign setting that has been professionally sold.  I will leave it to others to clean up the other sections. Samboy (talk) 15:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The superhero settings need a general cleanup as well: Green Ronin has released DC Adventures using M&M for the DC Universe.  I also can't believe that Omlevex is listed here, but the Champions Universe isn't. Tomd1969 23:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've started a cleanup
Talk:It Just Gets Worse

message: In the article it has 39, but then in the tracklisting it goes to 40 . . . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.244.207.29 (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of tracks? 

message: I had heard years ago (in the Grimoire of Exalted Deeds) that the album cover was supposed to be a cartoony drawing of a punk giving a thumbs up to Hitler, but Earache was afraid of controversy it would bring & ordered another cover be drawn immediately. Does anyone know anymore about this?--Hndsmepete 03:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Cover Controversy 

message: Im pretty sure that was a joke too...you know Eazy "E", "F" Mercury?Д narchistPig (talk) 03:17, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "F Mercury"
Talk:Top 40 Hits

message: "Top 40 hits" should redirect to a disambiguation page.  Not 1% of those who search for "Top 40 hits" are looking for this page.CountMacula (talk) 06:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A disambiguation page for what, exactly? What other articles would someone be searching for when typing in "Top 40 Hits"? And can you provide evidence that 99% of people looking for "Top 40 Hits" that come to this article do not intend to come here? MrMoustacheMM (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Tagatose/to do

message: * Explain production-oriented history of tagatose manufacturning: There is a good deal of information concerning the current status of tagatose. Spherix, the company that makes Naturlose has run into several roadblocks with their partnerships, including one with MD Foods (which has been slightly documented in this article.
* Explain the exact status of tagatose, its likely introduction to the marketplace, the rightful manufacturer and any methods of acquiring tagatose as a consumer.
* Explain the health effects on tagatose. A study with done with rats that, though not causing any damage, increased the size of their livers.
* Cite sources, including those related to already included information, scientific studies and legal incidents.
* Please consider adding an external link to "Sweet Persistence", an article in Johns Hopkins Magazine that discusses Gilbert V. Levin, the founder and CEO of Spherix, the company that holds the patents on D-tagatose.  http://www.jhu.edu/~jhumag/1102web/sweet.html  Although it discusses much more than D-tagatose, I found it interesting. 
206.188.38.176 (talk) 01:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Green card

message: There seems to be a number of places where the article quotes an external source (e.g. from U.S.C. § 1408) but adds underlining and bolding to various sections. The reference itself will note "(emphasis added)", but that isn't helpful to the reader. At the least, "(emphasis added)" should be visible after each such modified quote. Even better, I'd leave the material un-emphasized and true to its source, and use links or the accompanying text to convey what these added stylings were intended to convey. (I fixed one such instance early in the article, but not having experience with this topic I've left the rest.) -- Dan Griscom (talk) 14:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding styling (underline and bold) to quotes from external sources 

message: A victim of abuse spouse 68.194.245.149 (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abusive spouse 

message: Green card 181.118.37.79 (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green card
Talk:Treaty of Amsterdam

message: This article is a bit waffly. Rollo 18:55, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I'm not an expert so I hesitate to amend thta text my self. This is my concern:
"The Amsterdam Treaty did not settle all institutional questions once and for all". This is a sweet way to say that many of the decisions taken by this treaty were unmanageable and that they were to be addressed soon, like it was during the Nice Treaty. This artcile lacks of a criticism section, no ? Lvr 12:49, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Success of the Amsterdam Treaty 

message: I reverted a recent move of this article. I don't think it should be moved until there's consensus to do so. Fyi the current Google search results produce the following:
*"Rome Treaty" 94,100
*"Treaty of Rome" 515,000
*"Amsterdam Treaty" 249,000
*"Treaty of Amsterdam" 243,000
*"Maastricht Treaty" 674,000
*"Treaty of Maastricht" 301,000
*"Treaty of Nice" 253,000 
*"Nice Treaty" 187,000
*"Lisbon Treaty" 2,050,000
*"Treaty of Lisbon" 1,600,000
This vindicates the name used on Wikipedia with the exception of Lisbon. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 00:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Amsterdam Treaty v. Treaty of Amsterdam" 
Talk:Women's Challenge

message: Regarding the source for the material which I have posted on the Women's Challenge:
First, it is based on official race information as contained in various press packets supplied to certified press personnel such as myself. I personally attended the Women's Challenge races from 1998 to 2002 and have official information from those years including the Press Communiques issued to press personnel.
Second, the official race web site (womenschallenge.com) contains a wealth of information as well.
I will periodically refresh the data with accurate material saved to my hard drive to ensure that no errors are allowed to creed in.
JFPerry 19:10, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Portastudio

message: lacks citations, & the part about flanging is OR, as well as badly explained. I don't know how to tag for that, but as soon as I figure it out, I will.
also, do we have to have a massive list of people no-one's ever heard of who've used one the of damn things? a couple of the bigger names will do, surely?
duncanrmi (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Let's take out the flanging bit and all the uncited claims about people who've recorded with one. Cheers! DoctorMatt (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I added "citation needed" tags to many of the recorded-with claims in February so I'm happy to wait until April to hack away at these.  Cheers! DoctorMatt (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'function' section
Talk:Tank car

message: I have removed external links to discussion forums as they are a violation of WP:EL. -- HarveyHenkelmann 05:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: This article needs to be more generic to start with, and then go into more detail about the types of tank cars, and also about the different types of tank cars around the world:  for example, some european LPG tank cars are equipped with bottom off-loading, while North-American cars are not allowed to have bottom offloading.  Any more ideas? Manu (talk) 00:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Comments 

message: Maintaining a seperate page for a subtype of Tank car is unjustified. The content can be easily included without causing unnecessary fuss for readers. HarveyHenkelmann (talk) 23:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To prevent multiple discussions on different pages, please do further dicussions on Talk:Liquid hydrogen tank car. Thanks Mion (talk)
Missing info - Why are newer tank wagons of strange shape getting away from strict cylindric?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.201.230.177 (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A seperate article on [[liquid hydrogen tank car|Liquid Hydrogen tank cars]], is it really necessary? 

message: In Tank car#Representative tank cars, 
Image:GATX96500.jpg is missing. Peter Horn User talk 19:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing image 

message: The type "F" coupler has shelves over and under the coupler. Shouldn't this read type "E". Shelves over and under the coupler resemble the letter "E", hence the name.    Tabletop (talk) 04:59, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type F or Type E 

message: No information, no data on present size of tank cars? Really? Pathetic.40.142.183.194 (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you kidding me? 

message: Re Tank car#Safety, see Talk:Double shelf coupler#Clarification needed Peter Horn User talk 23:53, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed