lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moses Rosen

message: please correct this......what do you mean Ceausescu fascist regime?it's probably only a mistake i woulde advise whoever wrote this article to correct it and put communist instead because some people might actually be confused.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.114.40.11 (talk) 20:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nicolae Ceausescu" fascist regime? 

message: Hi! I was surprised being able to list the books available at the Bavarian State Library by using the PND:119261715 number:
* PND:119261715. Regards ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 21:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libraries 
Talk:State Jewish Theater (Romania)

message: see https://en.wikipedia.org/?curid=6172690 no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיק פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndik preferentsn talk contribs 09:36, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TES holiday in Romania
Talk:Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi

message: The article states that he had six sons, one of whom predeceased him; ref 2 states he left behind six sons; his French article states he had six sons. Which is true? Lkjhgfdsa 0 (talk) 21:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sons
Talk:Cult following

message: While I completely agree with the inclusion of Twin Peaks as a cult television series, I find the manor in which it is described in this article has very little to do with cult television, apart from reference to it being canceled, a movie made based on it and returning for another season many years later. 
The description really does nothing to illustrate how or why Twin Peaks is considered a prime example of a cult television series. For example, it fails to mention that its following grew immensely after it had been canceled and has continued ever since it was canceled. It fails to mention that there are one or more yearly conventions devoted to it. It fails to mention that numerous books have been written about it and a magazine was devoted to it. While mentioning that a third series was eventually produced, it doesn't explicitly make clear that this was largely due to its continued cult following after twenty years. While reasons that it is considered a prime example of cult television are plain to me as a cult fan of the show, I don't feel they are really explained here at all, it is just an overly large (in context) paragraph devoted to what we are expected to accept is a cult television series. 
This is an article on "cult followings" and not on "Twin Peaks", so the amount of information devoted to one specific example should be limited, but I find its inclusion as presented does little to advance the understanding of "cult followings".
Obviously, I guess I could attempt to improve this myself, but I don't feel particularly qualified to do so, following Wikipedia's need for attribution to sources and the like. I am hoping that someone more qualified can take this up, or, failing that, I may attempt to do so myself at some point in the future. Rsngfrce (talk) 10:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twin Peaks as cult television 

message: The Brands section mentions a lot of specific car models, shouldn't that be under it's own section? Cashew.wheel (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automobiles
Talk:Cult (disambiguation)

message: I also discuss some of this on the talk:Cult following page, but since some people tooking to disambiguate cult may not follow that link, I am also putting some comments here:
I ended up on the Cult (disambiguation) because there was a wikilink on the Superstar page to cult. As I figured, that like was devoted to religious and socialogical cults. From there, I went to the Cult (disambiguation) page, and then ended up the Cult following page, which seemed the most closest to what the Superstar article was referring to. This page, however, turns out to be only about the rather obsessive groups of fans for topics that are not on the mainstream radar, and does not discuss the just-as-fanatic fans of more popular subjects (for example, Michael Jackson fans. The question becomes, should the Cult following article cover both types of fans, or should there be two separate articles? At them moment, I can't see an way to put a title to two separate articles, so it may be best to cover both types of fans in this single article. gK ¿? 09:03, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Right! Cult following ought to cover cultish behavior of all followers, not just of pop stars, but including sports fans who shave their heads and paint them green. --Wetman 12:55, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cult following
Talk:Trouton's ratio

message: But it seems that Trouton's ratio is usually applied to something about viscosity.
Charles Matthews 09:25, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't the 'physics' (thermodynamic) one be a 'constant' rather than a 'ratio' since it has physical units ? Is there a ref for the thermodynamic one being called a ratio ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troutons constant redirects here - confusing
Talk:F-22 Raptor (video game)

message: from VfD:
Article gives no reason for notability, badly spelt. It's not a game that defined a genre or anything. And, from the quick research I've done, the article's description of the game as a 2D shooter has nothing to do with the real thing.
[maestro] 09:39, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: This site talks about a legal fight over exclusive use of f-22 raptor for games.
*cease and desist
delete Mjp797 17:06, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: cease and desist letter

message: According to Mobygames this was released in 1997, not 1998. Which is correct? 2fort5r (talk) 21:21, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date
Talk:Blazhen Muzh

message: Sorry, I submitted this article, but am dumb as to how to get the formatting to work correctly on the line breaks with the lyrics. This is my first submission, so please excuse my mistakes.
I want to download the mp3 at the bottom but I don't know the username and password.
Johnmblack (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Purges of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union

message: Request received to merge articles: "Case Spring" into Purges_of_the_Communist_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union; dated: June 2020. Proposer's Rationale: The source article is very small and contains the same information, therefore I see it as a duplicate article. Discuss here. Galendalia Talk to me CVU Graduate 19:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 10:33, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion
Talk:Caherdavin

message: Well if Caherdavin gets a page, then Clareview should definitely have one!
:Why not? Seabhcán 01:20, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: no it isn't
Yes i was censoring - censoring involves hiding the truth... "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable" i am sorry
Removed "(are they former drug addicts?)" - this is speculation and possibly slanderous. Ma11achy (talk) 15:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gabhala is censoring this page. Who gives him the right.
Talk:Yoshirō Mori

message: We should not have a table here because
*the subject is Japanese, not Korean
*pink is not neutral
*this defies Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)
*the photo in the table is not a portrait so it is inapporpriate to showcase it in this manner
*the photo is right aligned and therefore leaves uneven whitespace
Wikipedia:WikiProject Writing Captions says we should write in complete sentences and convention and common grammar states that we should not capitalize "born". --Jiang 11:38, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burning glass

message: Is there any written sources or archelogogy excavations showing vikings had anything with this place to do, and that there was a viking harbor town? Is the word viking mentioned, or is this just a free speculation? Dan Koehl 11:50, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I really need help. At school were doing experments on myths we could try out. my group are doing an experiment to see if a magnifying glass can actually burn stuff.
we tried four materials: wood bark, paper, plastic wrapper anf leaves. they work but i don't know why that happens, can somebody explain?
Pece Kocovski 02:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  science experiment 

message: This page appears to contradict itself, however I do not know the subject well enough to edit it properly.
Are you talking about the bit about archimedes? i've cleared that up. 121.6.110.166 04:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: If a person had access to one large parabolic mirror, I bet they had at least one smaller mirror.  The geometry of a telescope allows to create a pencil of concentrated light that astronomers have used to light fires and break their equipment unintentionally.  Ever been told that you need special filters to look at the sun?  The density of the output power is related to the ratio of the larger to smaller focal lengths and the larger both mirrors are, the more light will be collected and transfered.  It would be quite easy to design a method to allow safe and accurate targeting.  Even better, since the light is concentrated into a beam, the energy drops off more linearly as the light passes through the air as opposed to the inverse square drop with the radial pattern from a single mirror system (even in a vacuum!).  129.107.28.119 (talk) 19:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telescopes 

message: I remember that the flame of the temple of the Vestal virgins, as the Olympics torch, had to be lit only by the pure light of the sun. Because the fire had to be pure, not contaminated by a trigger.
They used parabolic mirrors.
This pure or "sacred" fire was used also to cauterize precisely the wounds in the hospital near the temple of the Vestal virgins.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.223.58.221 (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olympic torch and Vestal temple. 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Burning_glass&diff=prev&oldid=698560093
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Burning_glass&diff=698560374&oldid=698560093
These edits seem totally made up... Can I just remove/revert them?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeniffMartineau (talk • contribs) 08:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange addition is vandalism?
Talk:HMS Intrepid (L11)

message: Why does the Nordic Ferry get a special mention? (Dmgerrard (talk) 20:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Calcium metabolism

message: please include it's role in apoptosis  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.237.110.144 (talk) 14:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biological functions of calcium 

message: Could someone correct this? 25 in and 10+5 out doesn't give a net 5 in, so one of the numbers has to be wrong. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cnyh (talk • contribs) 10:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources of calcium 

message: Agree with post by Cnyh. Numbers don't add up. Found a new source that states "The percentage of calcium absorbed depends on the total amount of elemental calcium consumed at one time; as the amount increases, the percentage absorption decreases. Absorption is highest in doses ≤ 500 mg. So, for example, one who takes 1,000 mg/day of calcium from supplements might split the dose and take 500 mg at two separate times during the day."http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Calcium-HealthProfessional/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.100.97.30 (talk) 12:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absorption 

message: EIN (talk) 14:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Calcium homeostasis in aging neurons, Calcium metabolism and vitamin D in the extreme longevity --IONTRANSP (talk) 18:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does aging disrupt calcium metabolism? 

message: I have revised the section on the regulation of calcium metabolism, and added a new diagram which is clearer than the one that was there before (I hope). The revised text does not say anything that deviates radically from what was there before but is less telegraphic in style, and makes sure that all the logical steps are covered.
The preceding sections on the positive and negative interactions of calcium with other chemical make no sense. "Positive" and "negative" from what point of view? Just looking at the lists I think that these are meant to be substances that influence the availability of calcium for absorption from the gut, but some of the items listed make no sense. For instance sodium (a positive ion) cannot "bind" calcium (also a positive ion). I am very tempted to completely remove those two sections, leaving maybe only the list of foodstuffs that bind calcium and make it unavaibale for absorption (e.g. phytates etc.)Cruithne9 (talk) 12:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Positive and negative interactions with other chemicals
Talk:St. Pauli

message: *del: The district is nowadays one of the poorest in former West Germany.
This is not correct: In 2004 the inhabitants depending on social welfare are 11.3% (in the borough Hamburg-Mitte 11.3% (rich Altona borough 6.1%)). Unemployed were in 2006 11.1% (Hamburg-Mitte 10.4% (Altona borough 7.6%)). Inhabitants of the quarter St. Pauli earned in 1995 41,645 DM p.a. (Hamburg-Mitte 53,702 DM, Hamburg-Nord 65,475 DM, Altona 75,345 DM) In 2006 welfare paid according to the new law (Hartz IV) St. Pauli 18.5& (Hamburg-Mitte 18.4% Altona 10.6%). So the total borough of Hamburg-Mitte is poor nowadays ? This is a strong WP:POV, isn't it?
*del: The band have a disproportionately high number of fans in Germany. Citation ?
*del: St. Pauli is known as well as a centre for the German punk movement. Citation?
HUH not signed sorry Sebastian scha. (talk) 16:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleting of not corrct or not cited statements 
Talk:Plant cell

message: Somebody wrote "Dessutom  Jag hästar" - which is sweedish for  "I like horses" and it could not be removed by editing , Is this a hacker's job? DO SOMETHING!!
and it reads "There are 3" - with no explenation, ALSO .. They only put 2/3 .. (have a look.)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.250.24.199 (talk) 02:03, 1 October 2006 UTC.
:I've reverted the vandalism, which appears to have occurred several times. Colin Lower profile signature.°Talk 09:31, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: The page appears to be have been vandalised--again.  A pity as its main graphic is today's featured picture.  Could this be fixed, and maybe locked? 211.30.97.65 00:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Add some more information on it ? Anjishnu15 (talk) 05:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add more information 

message: Name the small particles that make a plant 41.13.88.152 (talk) 15:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What is plant cell 41.121.60.119 (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural science 

message: Plant cell 2409:4070:4E0F:E38C:E6CC:A9DA:8710:D796 (talk) 12:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology
Talk:Lizard

message: as per Leo Lorenzana the sound of a spanish Lizard is [11:26 AM] Lorenzana, Jhonleo "tsk tsk tsk señor" 159.53.174.144 (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2024 

message: Recommend reviewing and editing the section about darker skin color being useful for rejection of UV light rays. Most lizards the darker color shift goes from a greenish to a brownish, which indicates reflection of predominantly red light, which would be more at the infrared or thermal end of the visible spectrum.  In other cases, just a general darkening of the skin, to black for example, would indicate that less light of any visible wavelength is being reflected, and therefore more is being absorbed, which would heat the lizard.
So, I recommend review of that section associating darker skin with thermal regulation, which may be correct, but attributing that to ultraviolet (UV) rays seems unsupported. 72.15.91.119 (talk) 16:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 23:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2024 

message: 81.78.142.227 (talk) 09:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ABG  (Talk/Report any mistakes here)  09:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2024
Category talk:Defunct college football bowls

message: Needed:
        Oil Bowl (I know that there was one but don't know any details)
        Astro-Bluebonnet Bowl/Bluebonnet Bowl
        All-American Bowl (Legion Field)
There are additionally some games named on the college football page that haven't been added to the category yet, for those of you who have time.
Also, do the formerly-named lower-division games belong here?  For example, NCAA Division I-AA Championship, now called just that, was formerly called the Pioneer Bowl.  Divison II was at one time called the Camellia Bowl, which is noted in that article since there was also once a major-college bowl named that.  Division III was at one time the Grantland Rice Bowl and the Amos Alonzo Stagg Bowl.  There has also been at some point a Gardenia Bowl and an Azalea Bowl; I think that both were part of the lower-division playoffs.  As far as I know, names for the lower-division NCAA playoff games have all been dropped.  Is this correct?  What about naming-rights to games which may still exist under other names?  For example, at one point the Sun Bowl became the John Hancock Sun Bowl and then since no one was calling it the John Hancock Sun Bowl it became temporarily the John Hancock Bowl.  This obviously belongs under "Sun Bowl", but someone might need a redirect, if trying to look it up from a contemporary account from a time when there was no other name.  Now that John Hancock is no longer involved, is the John Hancock Bowl in a way defunct?  What about names that seem to have permanently disappeared due to naming rights, like the Hall of Fame Bowl (now Outback Bowl), Florida Citrus Bowl (now Capital One Bowl), etc.  Are redirects alone enough?  There are 'names' that have never even really been used and are "default" names in case naming rights can't be sold, like the "Blockbuster/Carquest/Your Name Here" Bowl in Ft. Lauderdale, which was technically the "Sunshine Festival Classic", IIRC, if no one bought the name?  I don't want to do anything on this without input from other interested people.  Takers? Rlquall 14:15, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Tamarin

message: * White-lipped tamarin, Saguinus labiatus
** Geoffroy's red-bellied tamarin, Saguinus labiatus labiatus
** Thomas's red-bellied tamarin, Saguinus labiatus labiatus
** Gray's red-bellied tamarin, Saguinus labiatus labiatus
All right - they can't all be S. l. labiatus!  I'm changing Thomas's to thomasi, IAW White-lipped tamarin, but which of the other two should be changed to rubiventer? 104.153.40.58 (talk) 15:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Gray's. IUCN helped me figure it. Good catch! - UtherSRG (talk) 18:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subspecies
Talk:Joint Intelligence Committee (United Kingdom)

message: During World War II was the Allied Joint Intelligence Committee a true Joint Allied stucture like SHAEF or SEAC or was the JIC as described here and the equivelent of British 11th Army Group before it was redesignated Allied Land Forces South East Asia? Philip Baird Shearer 14:43, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Allied Joint Intelligence Committee

message: I have created a United Kingdom intelligence community page where we can address the broad issues, such as the relative scope of MI5 and MI6 (as mentioned here).  Starting with the list of key agencies shown at the global List of intelligence agencies.  It should provide an appropriate place to deal with some of the ambiguities that the present atomised articles fail to cover well. 
To discuss, please use this Talk page.
Earthlyreason (talk) 06:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Overview of British intelligence - new article
Talk:Parliamentary sovereignty

message: Wonder if anyone thinks this should be expanded.  No mention is made of the Bill of Rights in England, which displaced the earlier mutings by the judiciary in Dr Bonham's Case (1610) and the Case of Proclamations (1611) that the primacy of statute law was not certain.
Echo_park00 10:13, 4 Apr 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of English Parliamentary Concept of Sovreignty 

message: I believe there used to be a fairly okay article on parliamentarism years ago, but this is not it. There is no mention of variants such as positive versus negative parliamentarism anymore, for example. What happened?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.186.55.135 (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does parliamentarism redirect here? 

message: Does India really have Parliamentary Sovereignity? The only source given to substantiate this argument is from an article which says that some political parties came together and unanimously voiced yheir concern over erosion of Parliamentary Supremacy. This is merely a sentiment or an opinion, not the factual truth. India has a Constitutional Supremacy and the Judiciary has powers of Judicial Review. The Basic structure doctrine is one such example. The Indian Parliament cannot amend the Constitution (even if it has the needed supra majority) or pass laws if it violates the doctrine, which consists Judicial independence and certain Fundamental Rights, among other things, under its arms. It's very much clear that the Parliament doesn't have Parliamentary Sovereignity or Superiority over the Constitution or the Judiciary. 
One very interesting thing that I saw in the sole 2013 source is that some political parties were demanding a Judicial Commission Act that would give the Executive and the Parliament a bigger say in the appointment of Judges. Consequentially the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act actually came into force in 2014 along with the 99th Constitutional amendment to serve the above mentioned purpose but got repealed in 2015 by the Supreme Court of India as it was held unconstitutional as it violated the Basic Structure Doctrine. This case is enough to prove the fact that Parliament doesn't rule supreme in India.
I am including my only source here :-
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/les-avis/parliamentary-supermacy-and-judicial-review-indian-perspective/
I am not going to remove India from the list as I want to have a discussion and sharing of sources in this Talk Page before taking any such step. I am in favour of attaining a consensus in this matter and therefore will wait a reasonable time for replies. SoloKnowHow83 (talk) 19:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of India 

message: Speak in English 197.215.21.93 (talk) 09:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parliamentary supremacy