lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Operation Horev

message: The following extract is from the 'Outcome' section: "...the Israeli Air Force shot down five RAF Spitfires on patrol in the area, killing two pilots and taking two more prisoner."
If the Spitfire is normally a single seat aircraft, what happened to the fifth airman?
RASAM (talk) 20:48, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Without checking the issue in-depth, I assume that he was neither killed nor taken prisoner. —Ynhockey (Talk) 12:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arithmetic doesn't check out
Talk:Julio Iglesias Puga

message: Why is this at Julio Iglesias, Sr. instead of Julio Iglesias Puga or Julio Puga? RJFJR 17:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: move to Julio Iglesias Puga  UtherSRG (talk) 23:06, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Julio Iglesias Sr. →  – Recommend moving this to either "Julio Iglesias Puga" or "Julio Iglesias (gynecologist)" as the title is a WP:NEOLOGISM. The senior, junior, III model is not used in Spanish, where this man spent his whole life. The English source from UPI introduces him as "Dr. Julio Iglesias Puga" and later calls him "Iglesias Sr.", a common journalistic way of disambiguating people, whether or not they share the same first name. The current title also runs into confusion as the son of Julio Iglesias is Julio Iglesias Jr., and is professionally known as that due to living in the US. The average person who sees the Jr. article and will expect the Sr. article to be Jr's father. Google Books search is mainly cheap biographies of his star offspring, but they too call him "Julio Iglesias Puga". It's up to you whether it's clearer to include his second surname, or his profession. Unknown Temptation (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 September 2022
Talk:June Lang

message: The article says that she was born in 1915, but the picture of her grave memorial at Find-A-Grave says 1917 (same date).
I assume that the other date came from one of the offline references - can someone check? --Alvestrand (talk) 19:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year inaccurate? 

message: The article has been edited to reflect correct date of birth (June's mother falsified it originally to avoid child labor laws, but June's daughter corrected it on her grave marker). Date of death also correct per daughter (my cousin). User: Hikerdudenc  —Preceding comment was added at 21:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year corrected
Talk:Hoher Meißner

message: Decided to change all (Meissner) to (Meißner) as that is the proper german spelling.  As most english speakers dont know what the heck an Estet is, i put the double 's' spelling next to the german spelling.  I then made the spelling consistent throughout the page.
Bearingbreaker92 00:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First comment
Talk:Sayeret Matkal

message: Actually this unit was established in 1964. (MARK S. 14:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sayeret Matkal WAS created in 1958, with Avraham Arnan as it's first Commanding Officer. If you have any information to the contrary then please provide it. WikiphyteMk1 11:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of establishment

message: Looks so ugly!! (MARK S. 18:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Info-Box

message: I dont know anything about this group, but there seems to be conflicting dates for when it came into existence. 
Also, the paragraph on Ehud Barak seems bias and unencyclopedic.
Perhaps someone who knows more about this group could re-write it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.4.74.65 (talk) 16:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: it says: "Sayeret Matkal (Hebrew: סיירת מטכ"ל‎, translation: General Staff Reconnaissance Unit)" but this is a mistake, the translation is without 'Reconnaissance' only General Staff unit. i have already fix that before but someone  - who don't know hebrew i guess - change it back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.117.247.221 (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be me and Hebrew is my native tongue. You cannot translate "סיירת" as "unit". Unit is "יחידה", "עוצבה" or a number of other words, but the root ס-י-ר means we're talking reconnaissance, and that's how all the sources refer to it. Poliocretes (talk) 18:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  mistake 

message: :What sources are these? Just because a book is published, does not make the material therin reliable. Sounds like crap frankly. What is the background of these books? Irondome (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New "material" 

message: On the basis of what the Insignia in this article was made of? first of all, it has a mistake in it's hebrew title (it's says saye'et not sayeret), and I don't believe that an original Insignia would include an english title. in the hebrew article this Insignia does not appear. Elyasaf (talk) 06:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Image is removed. --Hvd69 (talk) 13:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insignia 

message: Is it possible for female soldiers to join the Sayeret Matkal or the israelian special forces in general? --Exodianecross (talk) 01:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women 

message: The name order in #3 Notable members appears haphazard rather than logical. Perhaps it should be alphabetical order by surname, eg. Doron Avital, Nadav Argaman, Naftali Bennett, Muki Betser, etc. Mcljlm (talk) 02:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable members
Talk:Charlie Norman

message: Previously in the article:
----
This article is translated, to the best of my ability, for the benefit of Charlie's non-Swedish speaking admirers, by Mike Berry from http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Norman
I Apologise for any errors, which I hope you will correct.
I have corrected all titles of films and records as there is no point to make up your own translations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.16.29 (talk) 19:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should be re-edited to separate biography in correct temporal order from views on his accomplishments and more subjective views, and also the style should be made more strict (the reader in not on first name basis with Mr Norman). I may try a more deepgoing re-editing some other day. / Lave (talk) 15:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The biography is embedded in the introduction and needs to be embedded in a section.
TheHappiestCritic (talk) 05:50, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed this issue. TheHappiestCritic (talk) 05:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You and I both. SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography
Talk:Kathie Kay

message: The IMDB reference has her born:
:Kathleen Thornhill on 20 November 1918 in Gainsborough, Lincolnshire
The Times reference has her born
:Connie Wood from Glasgow in 1919.
Only one of these is likely to be correct... Ian Cairns (talk) 11:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins
Talk:Kay Tremblay

message: Obituary in the The Globe and Mail says Jan. 12, 1915 but the The Montreal Gazette says Jan. 12, 1914 (both can be found now in the references for the article). Wikipedia article lists 13 March 1914. Place of birth matches in all. I'm inclined to update the article date to 12th of January as there are two sources that agree on that & I've not yet seen a source for the 13 March date. I'd leave the year at 1914 as other sources also say she passed away at 91. Anyone have any thoughts? LooksGreatInATurtleNeck (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Kay Walsh

message: According to Brian MacFarlane's article on Walsh, which appeared in 2009 in the Oxford DNB: Lives of the Week, she died from unnatural causes. Something that never came out in any of the other obits. I can't find out any more about this online. Well, here's the article (note: her date of birth is different here):
Update; She remained active in films until her retirement in 1981, after the film Night Crossing. Walsh later lived in retirement in London. She died at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital from multiple burns, following an accident in her apartment, aged 93. Source; http://gratuitfilm.destinee-paris.net/actor/kay-walsh-67615.html.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shipscrew (talk • contribs) 03:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death
Talk:Kay Williamson

message: I think this list is overwhelming in size and trumps basically nearly every other author or academic listed on wikipedia.  In case some of these articles are notable and need to be re-put back on the main page, which is probable, I'm archiving the whole lot here. Marm(t) 11:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles authored by Kay Williamson
Talk:Kayo Hatta

message: The Fishbowl Website is not the correct website anymore(?).  It leads to a web hosting page. Removing Link... 24.52.80.82 04:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kenneth Bulmer

message: He also wrote comics - such as Steel Claw. -- Beardo 02:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comics work 

message: Many thanks to the people who have contributed to this page.  I only knew of Bulmer as "Adam Hardy", having read several of his "Fox" series as a kid.  I never knew he wrote SF, which is weird because I was (and still am) an SF nut and you'd think if I liked SF and also liked the Fox series (set in the British Navy at war in 1795-1805) then I'd have gone mad for Bulmer's SF.  But growing up in rural South Australia we were lucky to see more than one book in any series, let alone books across several series and across several pseudonyms.
The breadth and volume of Bulmer's output is simply staggering.  I'm just so sad that I only figured out who "Adam Hardy" was merely two years after Bulmer's death :-(  --Ossipewsk 00:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many thanks 

message: This was listed as being fragmentary and therefore unpublished due to a severe stroke, but Amazon.com lists it as having been published by Heyne in German, with the . BPK 15:04, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume 53 

message: The outline of the Dray Prescott series is also present at Dray Prescott series. Perhaps it could be summarized here and refer there?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.78.245.40 (talk) 23:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicated content 

message: Most of the links from book titles in the bibliography to individual pages are, in fact, to completely different books by completely different authors. Whoever inserted these didn't pay attention to what they were doing. --Michael K SmithTalk  22:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing them out, but why not just fix them? (I did.) Looks like there were actually just three of these bad links. And I suspect the links here were actually created before the mis-matching articles. BPK (talk) 01:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad links 

message: The Bibliography  is a very long list.  Is it too long?  RJFJR (talk) 18:59, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography too long?
Talk:Kevin Hagen

message: I removed a spoiler:
30 September 2023‎ Wastrel Way 10,179 bytes −12‎ →‎Acting roles: Removed spoiler "as murderer"; not biographical
Then, my edit was undone, with no explanation:
9 October 2023 curprev 19:11, 9 October 2023‎ 2601:18c:8000:aae0:5d35:7560:8de5:f94 talk‎ 10,273 bytes +9‎ →‎Acting roles
13 October 2023 curprev 01:35, 13 October 2023‎ 2601:18c:8000:aae0:9124:6344:3cba:d794 talk‎ 10,276 bytes +3‎ →‎Acting roles
I have removed the spoiler again. If this is necessary information about Mr. Hagen's life, please explain. I have left a note with the help desk for assistance. I am not starting an edit war, I merely think this doesn't belong. Wastrel Way (talk) 21:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler removed... please explain why this edit was reverted
Talk:Kikka (singer)

message: Should be moved back to Kikka (singer) since she was best known as just Kikka. YuckieDuck 20:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and what makes you think that using (singer) disambiguate a person is better than using her real name? What, if there is another singer with the same name too? Would you then prefer using Kikka (another singer)? --Easyas12c 06:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is this hidden away with Kikko Siren a redlink? Gene Nygaard 14:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe because her artist name was Kikka, not Kikko? JIP | Talk 00:02, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Squirreled away

message: Excuse me, can you put this same image to her Finnish page? Tunnevaiva (talk) 14:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo to Finnish wikipedia
Talk:Relativity drive

message: I'm new here, but can somebody link this to the emdrive at wiki? It's about the same thing.
Redirected to EmDrive, as they are exactly the same thing. I could have proposed this for deletion, but the string 'relativity drive' will be well known from the New Scientist article (it was what led me here) so it is worth keeping as a search target to redirect to the main article (unless there is a more efficient way of doing it???). There is nothing in the contents of this article over the contents of the EmDrive and Emdrive pages, so there is nothing to merge 81.86.145.236 21:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lane Smith

message: The infobox mentions a second marriage from 2000 to 2005 and 2 children, but the article body only says he was survived by one son (presumably the "1 child" indicated in the infobox as issue from his first marriage?) The legacy.com obituary cited only states "Besides his wife, Smith is survived by his son Robbie, 18, and a brother and sister. He also has a 19-year-old stepson." How do the two children from his second marriage fit into this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.66.140 (talk) 03:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I note nndb gives the "2 children"; this legal proceeding seems to indicate "no minor children"- https://trellis.law/case/BD335594/LANE-SMITH-VS-DEBBIE-BENEDICT-SMITH - but its meaning is unclear to me at least.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.66.140 (talk) 03:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Children?
Talk:Sikh scriptures

message: It has been suggested that this article be merged with SGGS. This cannot be done as the Sikhs have more than just the SGGS as their scriptures. Although the SGGS is the main one and the perpetual Guru, the other like the Dasam Granth, Bhai Gurdas Varan, Kabits, etc. various Huknanmanas of the Gurus are also covered here. I have removed this tag from the article. This article needs to be expanded. --Hari Singh 00:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:László Fejes Tóth

message: "He proved that a honeycomb pattern is the most efficient way to pack equal circles in the Euclidean plane"
Is this correct??  Is this not the same as Thue's theorem, proved in 1909?
Shadowsill (talk) 12:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Honeycomb page, it's not correct, and this very man is the one who showed that an alternative design would be .035% more efficient. However, it's not sourced, so who knows. The2crowrox (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See User:Bikermacska/sandbox for the draft of a major expansion planned for a week, or so. It is awaiting review from subject matter experts. Please post your comments about the expansion either here or at User talk:Bikermacska/sandbox. User:HopsonRoad 20:59, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major expansion coming 

message: Just for clarification. The math project prefers the use of the term priority over importance since we are not attempting to rate how important the subject matter is in the field of mathematics (as may be the case in other projects), but rather what priority math editors should put on this when deciding to work on an article. We do things this way (not the norm in WP) since there are so many math articles and so few math editors that some sort of triage is needed. The low priority rating that I've reverted to means that, in my assessment, given the subject matter, the article appears to be in pretty good shape and the math editors need not be overly concerned about it. Of course, this does not stop anyone with an interest from contributing to the page, and I certainly hope that they will. Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 03:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for leaving that clarification, Bill. It makes sense. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 04:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Math priority rating
Talk:Big Little Book series

message: I have three Big Little Books I acquired in the late 1960s/early 1970s, and all feature colour pictures: 
*Journey to the Center of the Earth (Realm of the Reergs) 
*Beep Beep the Road Runner (the super road-runner catcher, unwittingly financed by the US government) 
*Mickey Mouse (space cities, kidnapped scientists & "Black" Pete)
My brother had one and it, too, had colour pictures (I don't know if he still has it).
*Batman (criminal named "The Cheetah")
GBC 00:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: B&W or colour?
Talk:Leo Sternbach

message: Leo Sternbach is an important figure in the history of Benzodiazepines; hopefully someone with good info/verifiable sources can add to the article and improve (add) his person-info-box to include his age/death, alma matters('), degrees, etc..-TAz69x (talk) 07:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvement 
Talk:Leon Askin

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Please add the film "John Goldfarb, Please Come Home!" 1965
the voice is so distinct.
192.119.39.86 (talk) 03:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been ages since I saw te film, does he have a significant part? BMK (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition  

message: So the list of his films and TV includes "Different Strokes" but not Hogan's Heros?  What could possibly be the logic behind this insanity?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longinus876 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gen. Burkhalter 

message: The data doesn't make sense (divorced by wife #2 before marrying) which calls all dates into question:
Louise "Mimi" Huntington-Smith
​(m. 1945; div. 1955)​
Annelies Ehrlich
​(m. 1955; div. 1944)​
Anita Wicher
​(m. 2002) 97.127.84.46 (talk) 02:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage-divorce correction 

message: he had a speaking part in one of the episodes of McMillian and wife . He played a red suited waiter named ingo. Took food order at a restaurant with Mac and his wife. " no hearts no flowers" tv 1973  47.224.121.157 (talk) 19:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  McMillan and wife cameo.
Talk:Leonid Shamkovich

message: The article claims that in the year 1966, he had a rating of 2675. But 1) there were no official ratings back then. 2) looks suspiciously high.
Would be good to see some supporting evidence! Emma knows it well (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree on both counts.  Also see WP:CHESSRATING.  I will take the liberty of fixing this.  Bruce leverett (talk) 02:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peak rating
Talk:Martin, Slovakia

message: The article needs a section added on its economy - ie, its main industries.  I'll make a start with its Volkswagen Group factory.  78.32.143.113 (talk) 10:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Economy section
Talk:Lim Por-yen

message: WP:DATE clearly states: "Wikipedia has articles on days of the year, years, decades, centuries and millennia. Link to one of these pages only if it is likely to deepen readers' understanding of a topic." I have once again reverted edits linking to date articles. I contend this is overwikification as the links are not at all helpful. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overwikification

message: The whole section on Lim's multiple marriages is currently supported by one Chinese references. I would propose that unless an English reference can be found that this section is deleted. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple marriages
Talk:2006 Baltimore Ravens season

message: There seemed to be some confusion as to whether or not the Ravens clinched a bye in Week 16. Unfortunately, they didn't.
In playoff seeding in a Conference, the Wild-Card tie-breaking procedures are used.
1) Head-to-head
2) Conference Record
3) Record among common opponents
In the event the Ravens lose in Week 17 and the Colts win, both teams will be 12-4. They have not played head-to-head this season and both would have 9-3 Conference Records. However, Indianapolis is currently 4-1 among common opponents with Baltimore, whereas the Ravens are only 2-2 against common opponents. Therefore the Colts would win the tie-breaker and become the second seed. However all other scenarios will result in a second seed for the Ravens:
*Baltimore WIN - Colts WIN: Ravens 13-3, Colts 12-4. Ravens with better W/L record.
*Baltimore WIN - Colts LOSS: Ravens 13-3, Colts 11-5. Ravens with better W/L record.
*Baltimore WIN - Colts TIE: Ravens 13-3, Colts 11-4-1. Ravens with better W/L record.
*Baltimore TIE - Colts WIN: Ravens 12-3-1, Colts 12-4. Ravens with better W/L record.
*Baltimore TIE - Colts LOSS: Ravens 12-3-1, Colts 11-5. Ravens with better W/L record.
*Baltimore TIE - Colts TIE: Ravens 12-3-1, Colts 11-4-1. Ravens with better W/L record.
*Baltimore LOSS - Colts WIN: Ravens 12-4, Colts 12-4. Colts with better record among common opponents.
*Baltimore LOSS - Colts TIE: Ravens 12-4, Colts 11-4-1. Ravens with better W/L record.
*Baltimore LOSS - Colts LOSS: Ravens 12-4, Colts 11-5. Ravens with better W/L record.
For more on Tie-Breaking procedures, see here: Tie-Breaking Procedures Official NFL Tie-Breaking Procedures on ESPN.com, or here: NFL playoffs
--Matt72986 08:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation on Clinching First-Round Bye