lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jefferson High School (Michigan)

message: I redirected Jefferson High School to the Jefferson Schools article, because there's no reason for JHS to have its own article.  The article's only edits since its creation have been vandalism (probably by its own students).  The article contains absolutely no useful information.  There is nothing of notability to warrants its own article at this time.—№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė♫♪ 12:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Dana H. Born

message: The "Controversies" section fails to make clear what the controversies are about. I assume it has been written by people who want to establish whether General Born is or is not guilty of whatever she has been accused of. But this is pretty much irrelevant while the general reader can't tell what the controversies are about anyway, and even how many controversies there are. Unless someone can make this clear, I believe the whole section should be deleted. Maproom (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, rewritten or deleted.Naraht (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Controversies" section 
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-12-14 Persian Gulf

message: To what extent is the decision reached final?--Agha Nader (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The mediation cabal is a rather informal venue; the decision reached is not "binding" as such, but reached with the consensus and agreement of the editors involved. If the mediation breaks down (i.e. one or more editors refuse to compromise on the issue), then either the Arbitration or Meditation Committee then become involved. CloudNine (talk) 17:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As well, noting that one side or the other participated in the mediation and then refused to abide by its conclusions get a rather dim view by ArbCom, should it actually come to that. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 17:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I may participate later on in the process. So far, my views are being expressed by others. I am just worried that certain users (such as pejman.azadi) will not participate and their views will not be expressed and that they will not abide by the decision reached.--Agha Nader (talk) 17:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Steve Reicher

message: Re this recent deletion, Reicher (1984) was published in the European Journal of Social Psychology here and is already included in the list of Publications. Is a secondary source (also) required? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:32, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The St. Pauls' riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model" 

message: Anyone have a source? Seems it might be news to the BPS themselves? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: So, without any source, it should be removed? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:56, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Now sourced: . Martinevans123 (talk) 12:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  HonFBPsS?
Talk:Vicki Genfan

message: This article needs to be rewritten by someone who knows the subject, who can write in reasonably good English, and who isn't using Wikipedia to promote the subject with non-neutral stuff like this:  "She is an experienced and good teacher, lectures at workshops and guitar clinics and teaches private lessons." 
The article comes across like an ad on Craig's list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.211.134 (talk) 06:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't complain, do it! --Jo (talk) 19:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Powell (kite maker)

message: The tail was a hollow tube, but since it was tied to the base of the kite, wind could not get into it, so it was never inflated. In fact, if it did inflate, it would not stream along the path the kite took, since it would have bulk and therefore structure.
Kites first came in blue, then yellow and red were introduced (all primary colours). I'm not sure if there was a green, but yellow and red definitely (I still have some of the plastic sheets they were made of, given to my father after some work he did for Peter Powell).
You're right - the great thing about the tail was it traced out the path that kite had taken. I can remember red, blue and yellow kites, but I don't ever remember seeing a green one. The plastic sheet was called the "sail", and better toyshops sold them separately because they often got torn in collisions with bushes and trees. In fact just about all kite components could be bought separately as spares, if you knew where to shop for them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.99.210 (talk) 20:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Gospel Gangstaz

message: It should be noted that because the group has featured members formerly affiliated with the Crips and Bloods gangs, Mr. Solo, Chilly Baby, DJ Dove and Tik Tokk (ref,) WP:WikiProject Organized crime is interested in it. —usernamekiran(talk) 11:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Organised crime
Talk:List of symphonies in B-flat major

message: Have been removing the key from work names (in the case of works like Stravinsky's Symphony in C where it's a demonstrative, not an incidental, part of the title, so to speak, well... no) as redundant given the title of the page- but- any ideas? Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any ideas on what?  How to do this efficiently?  Removing this redundancy is nice when possible, but due to tedium I can see it being a low priority.  Many of the lines on these pages are just pasted from other lists of works.  But, if you have the time, then go ahead. DavidRF (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy
Talk:Palmaria (artillery)

message: So with the turret facing forward, after the gun becomes completely vertical it can now swing to point literally backwards to form a 10º angle with the upper part of the rear of the vehicle? That would be an almost ridiculous design (for starters, why would a 90º+ degree elevation be desirable at all? Maybe someone thought the vehicle should be able to self-destruct that way?). Obviously there's a mistake, both in the article and the source. 
The vehicle has a +70º elevation, which seems more logical. (FOSS, CHRISTOPHER F. "Jane's Tanks and combat vehicles recognition guide" 2ed. Harper Collins 2000, pp.432)
I believe the article should be corrected.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.181.210.232 (talk) 06:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: +170º Elevation?
Talk:Marty Davis

message: This page was created and edited by user "martycdavis". This appears to be the subject of the wikipedia entry. Wperdue (talk) 17:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: As per wp:notability  "Being related to a notable person in itself confers no degree of notability upon that person." and from wp:delete#merging "For example, information about family members of a celebrity who are not otherwise notable is generally included in, or merged into, the article on that celebrity."  I think it is clear here, that we have a person who is only notable because she was married to someone (somewhat) famous.  Failing any new example of noteworthiness, i propose she be a subsection of Robert William Davis.Bonewah (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: She has had some minor television work, so she's not solely notable for being someone's spouse. I know the present article is in bad shape, but we could revert to the version that came of out the AFD, which had a higher proportion of sourced content. Zagalejo^^^ 20:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That edit is better than this one, no argument here.  However, I feel the subject still fails to reach wiki's standard of notability as nothing there seems to go beyond "wife of politician, subject of picture".  Heck, a quick glance at the sources of that edit reveals that a majority of them refer to her as the wife of a politician.  Still, if you feel reversion will help the quality of wiki, then by all means revert it, i ask only that you install the notability tag on whatever edit ends up coming to the fore. Bonewah (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Robert William Davis]] 

message: *http://downfalldictionary.blogspot.com/2017/11/bob-davis-rubber-checks-and-leotards.html
*https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1989/06/08/welfare-woes-of-hill-wife-marty-davis/d1d7c698-b3ed-4258-a295-40c5c33004cc/
*https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1985/02/07/marty-davis-and-the-pose-that-was/ab12cd44-93ac-4e9c-a16a-921cf0cbf7fe/
*https://books.google.com/books?id=HgMUzNsJCrUC&pg=PA55&dq=marty+davis+spy&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-gdCah-LXAhWkzIMKHSbpBMwQ6AEILDAB#v=onepage&q=marty%20davis%20spy&f=false (content warning:female breasts)
Bonewah (talk) 15:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some potential sources
Talk:Ian Wood (businessman)

message: This page is biased - Union Terrace Gardens development has been marked as "an achievement" and as an act of "philanthropy".  The vote about the plan came out against the majority will, hence calling it an act of philanthropy is misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.215.187 (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:UPLC

message: Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC)
During this evolution of LC, HPLC has become a significant tool and gained widespread use in all types of laboratories. Some of the reasons HPLC has become so popular is the use in Pharamceuticals and Chemical Industary. As scientists we are continually faced with new challenges. From compound discovery through product development and quality control. And today’s challenges are increased through business decisions that create the need to characterize more complex samples whether it be biological fluids, biopharmaceuticals, natural products, formulations with multi-active ingredients or high potency drugs that are delivered in low doses and requiring high sensitivity detection. Other business challenges drive our processes in the laboratory as well from number of samples, to regulatory considerations, to time to market challenges and budget guidelines.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.244.159 (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dana J.H. Pittard

message: Do not undo criticism because you feel it was unfair. It is still something notable that happened. This is not a place for your opinions. Velostodon (talk) 17:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Crticism Section

message: The section tagged weasel is Poorly sourced, contentious, libellous material. For example, the statements about the physical safety of the post do not jibe with the record. For 4 years in a row, El Paso was the safest city for its size in the relevant years of Pittard's tenure. I will wait for a response, and, failing a response, act on this material, per WP:BLP. --Ancheta Wis    (talk  | contribs) 05:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly sourced, contentious, libellous material 

message: MG Pittard retired 30 Sep 2015 in a General Officer Retirement Ceremony at Conmy Hall, JBMHH, where he was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal (See the photos of his retirement ceremony.) 
Pittard has pointed out that there is no recourse against the actions which were initiated by his anonymous accusers, as all charges were unsubstantiated. This is a process problem for the office of the Inspector General.
--Ancheta Wis    (talk  | contribs) 06:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  All charges unsubstantiated 

message: The General Officer Retirement Ceremony pictures showed that Pittard had 20 ribbons above his left pocket and 3 above his right pocket, +  Distinguished Service Medal (U.S. Army) awarded on retirement. But the current list only accounts for 7. --Ancheta Wis    (talk  | contribs) 02:43, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards and decorations 

message: He was commander of H Company during his service there.  He was not E Troop commander. 2603:7000:193F:B34F:D908:CEF:628D:1E2C (talk) 17:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Kissingen, Germany service.
Talk:Yarennoka!

message: Based on a Babelfish translation of the cited Japanese article, I edited the text of the Misaki/Akiyama note. I cannot translate the Japanese on my own, so obviously it was a "loose" translation based upon what I could gather from the broken English provided by Babelfish. If anyone can translate the article themselves, or possibly find an English article about the issue, that would be immensely helpful. Gromlakh (talk) 02:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misaki/Akiyama 

message: I don't see what this is adding to an encyclopedia entry about the show. None of the fights were particularly notable, and it's not done in any other entries about recent MMA shows. The consensus has always been to list the results and anything particularly notable about the fights (such as antics afterwards), but never to give a full play-by-play of the fights. Why should this show be any different? Gromlakh (talk) 22:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Play-by-play
Template talk:Latvian SSR First Secretaries

message: Proper template created--first secretaries of the SSR did not belong in a template listing Latvian presidents. Also, the list was missing the last First Secretary (Rubiks). Alas, once again, alleged über-nationalists correcting accounts of Soviet history (as opposed to the other "correcting" which involves disputing propaganda). —PētersV (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created, corrected
Talk:ScanSafe

message: The company name is ScanSafe with a capital S in Safe. Is it possible to change the title to this please?
Thanks --Brittcooper (talk) 17:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done via a page move. Regards.--12 Noon 2¢ 18:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: (Untitled)

message: I have restored the Recognition section. Awards received by notable entities, such as the Codie award, can serve to establish notability for this company. North America1000 03:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoration
Talk:Deanna Laney murders

message: I think the title is inappropriate for a BLP. Deanna Laney was found not guilty of murder due to insanity. To also add her to categories that imply she is guilty of being a murderer is not a neutral point of view and hints strongly at libel.  "Deanna Laney" would be more appropriate, since people who are interested in her will more likely search simply her name rather than by what what she did. 
Seeing that Laney was a high profile case of national importance, I think she deserves a bio that is more detailed, including a more involved treatment of her medical, legal and religious histories. I seem to recall she was involved with a very charismatic preacher that may have influenced her, and I also remember many articles where the media had made an issue of this aspect. Pschologists have said that psychosis and charismatic religious influences are a dangerous combination.
Also, the article's graphic descriptions seem unencyclopedic to me. "Bashed in their skulls" (paraphrased) sounds a little sophomoric and unprofessional for an encyclopedia. "Murders" as a word would probably work better as "filicides" or killings to avoid any implication Laney is guilty of any crime.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.64.41.117 (talk) 00:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title, Expand Stub
Talk:ARA Isla de los Estados

message: No doubt it's still a Stub! Cheers, DPdH (talk) 02:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not anymore. DPdH (talk) 14:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality re-assessment 
Talk:The Great Escape (book)

message: Please add to this article so that it's not deleted.  Emperor001 (talk) 18:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I thought this was non-fiction. Doesn't characterizing it as a novel imply it's fiction?
—WWoods (talk) 20:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel? 

message: Some thoughts re expanding this wiki.
real event \to book \to film.
One might look for reliable sources that discuss  making the book from the facts of the real event, and making the movie from the material in the book. Please note that discussion of making the film from real events, or innaccuracies in the film,  is not appropriate here unless it can be discussed in terms of being inconsistent with the material in the book, and it would require a reliable source for the discussion. It would be inappropriate to have a discussion in the wiki of 
real event \to film .
--Bob K31416 (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand 

message: According to this article, only 200 men were to escape, not 220 as this wiki article states. 24.0.153.224 (talk) 19:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  200 men were to escape, not 220...? 

message: the last sentence of of the summary says:
In the aftermath of the escape, according to Brickhill, 5,000,000 Germans spent time looking for the prisoners, many of them full time for weeks.[9] can someone who has the book please check that figure (pg 279 according to the ref). five MILLION?  really? that's got to be a vandalized number, no?  that's double the entire number of personnel in the whole Wehrmacht in 1945 --at least according to our wiki article there. Cramyourspam (talk) 13:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  gotta be fake 
Talk:Mattias Gardell

message: There's a difference between folkish Asatru/Odinist organizations and neo-nazi/racist groups. The 3 largest folkish Asatru/Odinist organizations (Asatru Folk Assembly, Asatru Alliance, and Odinic Rite) are quite clear about being non-political/non-racist, AFA & AA blatently denouncing white supremacism.JanderVK (talk) 02:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Folkish

message: Världen idag may not be a good enough source, I am not sure. Does anyone have a better one, or a high enough opinion of the source to add the point with this ref? Yngvadottir (talk) 21:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gardell is, or was, Asatru himself
Talk:Business agility

message: How is this different from agile enterprise?  Is one a noun and the other an adjective?  WLU (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I think a definition and starting point for business agility is needed. 
Tom Debevoise - What does the openning sentence mean? "The agile enterprise strives to make change a routine part of organizational life to reduce or eliminate the organizational trauma that paralyzes many businesses attempting to adapt to new markets and environments."  
What is:
-organizational trauma
-what does "paralyze" mean in this context? go bankrupt? out of business?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.165.246.30 (talk) 19:18, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition needed

message: Looks like a type in this line under *Operating at the edge of chaos* seems like some of this is a bad translation or something:
"Organizing in ongoing activity to develop structures and communication methods that promote serial incompetence"
-Colin  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.38.250.60 (talk) 20:48, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo

message: This article suffers from too many buzzwords and jargon. As well as insufficient references and citations to back up the content. I propose that the definitions, examples, and context is rewritten substantially. Additional citations and references can be drawn from the Business Agility Institute, Agile Business Consortium, as well as research from Harvard.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleybourn (talk • contribs) 10:51, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 

message: There is a lot of content on Enterprise Architecture that would be better suited to the EA page, rather than here. Alternatively, a small section calling out the relationship between Business Agility and EA could be incorporated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleybourn (talk • contribs) 10:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose to delete content on Enterprise Architecture
Talk:Concord, Vaughan

message: This article needs some looking into. The 9K population figure does not make sense, the citations of Highway 401 and Barrie are superfluous (you'd make more sense taking about Steeles Ave and Highway 7), and the industry reference seems bogus (Markham is more industrial than Concord, and so is Oakville). elpincha (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Non-FIFA international football

message: This entire article needs thorough review.
*Title  I saw some kids playing in the park on the way home from work today.  I'm fairly sure that the match was not endorsed by FIFA.  Should it be reported here?  Clearly not: the point being that the article is about Non-FIFA international football.  However, even the continental championships are not organised by FIFA, so why should they not be included here?  
*OR Tone  From whom does FIFA have a mandate?  In what way are regional associations "first" among categories of "National" teams?  Why is Jersey a good example?  (I would suggest it is among the worst possible examples, as Jersey is not part of England, but the Jersey FA is a member of the English association).  
I've made a few edits, but I suspect that merger of any new info here into one of the other articles, or making this a category, would be better.  Kevin McE (talk) 18:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

message: This is a minor competition...a friendly competition..  Stanza13 (talk) 20:09, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: KTFF 50th Anniversary Cup

message: There is a football team in Marshall Islands. The Japanese version and Korean version exist in the Wikipedia. Why you say there is no team in Marshall Islands. They have played with other nation's football team which are all member of FIFA. Could you give the reason for this? Thank you very much. Forever elementary student (talk) 06:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Marshall Islands national football team
Talk:1999 Galtür avalanche

message: hi
wubu2. i have been doing a project on the Galtur Avalanche and i found this very helpful and intresting. The links are good because it helps you find out more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.213.74 (talk) 16:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Oghuz languages.PNG

message: There is a big error on this map. In Azerbaijan, the southwestern part which is the equivalent of Nagorno-Karabakh (and its surrounding territories) should not be colored at all because no one speaks Azeri there. It is independent and its spoken language is Armenian. Please correct this grave error. - Fedayee (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy
Talk:George Farragut

message: Catalan can mean someone from Catalonia or it can refer to the language. When marking someone as being of Catalan descent, it seems its referring to Catalonia. It would be more precise and correct to mark Farragut as "American people of Balearic descent". The same would be true for David Farragut.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.23.47.132 (talk) 19:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  American people of Catalan descent 

message: The article states that Farragut changed his name to George. If so it is not untrue that he was known as George but one would infer from this statement that he hadn't changed his name. It's like saying Washington is known as George Washington in the U.S.  Anyone called by their name is known as a person of that name. Using the phrase in this article implies that people in the U.S. assign George to Farragut as if that was not in fact his name. It would be correct instead to state something like, "Born Jordi Farragut Mesquida and later George Farragut". If one insisted on keeping the 'known as' phrase, one could add, accurately, 'known as Jordi Farragut' in Catalonia. But then one would be compelled to add, 'known as Jorge in Spain, Giorgy in Russia, Jürgen in Germany, Giorgio in Italy, etc'. As this is not typically done in articles, I recommend the simpler, 'Born X, later Y' or the like. 
108.23.47.132 (talk) 18:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known in America as