Talk:Cardistry

message: I suggest people look at the discussion pages of WikiProject Magic
. There is a possibly spurious entry on extreme card manipulating which arguable should be subsumed by Flourish:
::== Extreme card manipulation ==
Someone, obviously insider, wrote an article about it. Is it considered magic, or not? How should it be classified? Samohyl Jan 11:38, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This stuff is plainly just a branch of flourishes. Just the fact that the author/s need to refer to flourishes is enough for me. You can do flourishes for many reasons - and some Western vaudeville artists just did card flourishes in the first half of the 20th century. There are all sorta geeky, ossessional sub-categories of ANYTHING. Wiki should not allow folks to self-publicise by cornering off a small piece of something and then describing it as a category all of its own - and then conferring some badge of legitimacy to whoever is associated with the new category. Anyhows, the so-called extreme manipulators are only labelling what is already out there - magicians for hundreds of years have been into this muscular thing of showing off their skills at high speed charlier cuts and passes, how many decks they can use simultaneously, how fast they can close a fan one-handed. We should amalgamate these guys into the flourish section and be done - no naming of the guys [you bet there are no girls!] who stuck a flag on it. Speaking of which the flourish section needs expansion. Selfpublicitysucks 23:23, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

text: What action do you have in mind? Samohyl Jan 09:54, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  nuclear war should be appropriate --Slashme 12:06, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Extreme card manipulation]]

message: I have put up XCM or extreme card manipulation up for deletion. In the light of the discussion on the delete page I am making changes to flourish which are in keeping with the balance of the discussion. Grroin 00:34, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD on XCM / extreme card manipulation 

message: This is nothing but a list of unsourced types of card flourish with very few links to articles. I would suggest either giving brief descriptions of the individual flourishes, or removing those without articles. --GraemeL (talk) 14:23, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I absolutely agree. Only the well known or published should be listed. But I am not an expert, if you are please go ahead. Samohyl Jan 17:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunatly, I'm not. :-/ --GraemeL (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I think it would be more useful to instead of listing a random number of flourishes (which obviously people have gone in to include their own moves so they'd show up in Wikipedia), it would be nice to simply list the different categories of known moves, maybe highlighting one or two commonly known ones for each. This would give a much better explanation for what a flourish is. I don't think the point of the article is to say that there are 1000's of flourishes. --67.68.49.12 12:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Came here looking for information on flourishes such as those added to the ends of signatures, and found nothing on the subject whatsoever... 71.198.127.97 06:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about writing? 

message: Came here looking for flourishes on anything, like swordplay, maybe notes could be added? --86.16.123.192 22:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non card flourishes 

message: There's certainly enough material out there to make a wikipedia article on Card Flourishing. However, yes... A flourish doesn't necessarily mean a card flourish. As has been suggested in the discussion, flourishes such as those used when signing your name with a pen (note the signature of John Hancock) or those used in swordplay. I think a disambiguation page would be appropriate, as well as a clean-up involving card flourishing (the interest that brought me here in the first place). 
I don't think that "Florysche" which directs you to "Association for Renaissance Martial Arts" is appropriate for a merger. However, I do believe it's more than appropriate for a disambiguation.
Other thoughts? Thanks!
--Protocoldroid (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved this article to 'card flourish' so the article flourish is now a redirect and available to be mad a disambiguation page.  RJFJR (talk) 20:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Excellent move *thumbs up* --Protocoldroid (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: Disambiguation Page 

message: Note on photograph: This was moved from the card magic article. More photographs for our selection would be favorable. I looked up the flourish here and gave reference for the term only. This reference is not in defense of the photograph, but, an explanation thereof. 
I tried to flesh out the definition and used Tarr's book to try to back it up. I requested the "fact" flag on the terms "cardistry" and "extreme card manipulation" because A. I'm quite curious to know where these terms originated (I know they're in general use as jargon), and B. this will make the article more legitimate.
--Protocoldroid (talk) 14:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added References 

message: Cardistry#General cardistry categories appears to be nothing but a list of flourishes, which overlaps and is functionally redundant to Card flourish#Terminology.  The former should merge into the latter, and the cardistry article should be developed to cover the various schools of cardistry instead of duplicating the function of the flourishes article, which in turn should be more developed to cover more of the different flourishes.  If anything in the cardistry list isn't actually a flourish but some other cardistry move, it should stay there (in a more appropriately named section) with a pointer to this article for names and definitions of the flourishes (e.g. * Flourishes of various sorts (see Card flourish for a detailed list), and limit itself to only non-flourish cardistry moves as other list entries. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 10:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm in agreement, good call! Also good edits, thanks SMC. I'm going to put a fact tag back on XCM, I'm really hoping for the betterment of this article that someone can find some good references surrounding that topic, i'd like to see it defined and dated. As far as I know, OR / anecdotally -- XCM is a brand name that De'Vo uses to sell his material surrounding flourishing. --Protocoldroid (talk) 02:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Card flourisher doesn't appear to add much substantive content that isn't already on this page, and could easily be merged?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annelid (talk • contribs) 20:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I propose that Card Flourish should be merged with Card Manipulation.
Card Flourishes is a subset of card manipulation.  The termn "flourishes" was created by magicians and only used by magicians when doing moves with their magic.  Pure card manipulation is just "Card Manipulation."  The title published in 8 magazines and several television shows for practioners using only card manipulation as an indepdendent artform is Extreme Card Manipulation (XCM).  But both are forms or subsets of card manipulation.
Drlmagicman (talk) 10:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Card Flourish merge with Card Manipuation 

message: There is a musical act from Los Angeles called "Flurish" and an article cannot be created due to a redirect for the word to this article about card flourishes. 
Is is possible to remove this redirect?
Can anyone help as I am a newbie?
www.flurish.net
Cpacilio (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why a redirect from "Flurish"? 

message: "Cardistry" does not exist there.  I don't contribute there, but somebody who does might want to give it a go.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. If need be, I'll do it after the GA-review. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 15:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's done! Your welcome. Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 00:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Cardistry's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "wired":
From Dan and Dave (magicians): "Inside the Elegant, Mesmerizing, Subculture Art of Card Juggling" (20 April 2015). Wired. Retrieved 6 December 2015.
From History of cardistry: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Cardistry]] 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: — Assignment last updated by Editoratlarge55 (talk) 17:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing C1