lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ben Spies

message: Which birthplace is correct, Tennessee or Texas?--MartinUK (talk) 13:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: His birthplace is TN.  He lives in Longview, TX.  See here.  Spies' info is on Page 44. ♫ ψadems ♫ (talk) 14:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace
Talk:Aliivibrio fischeri

message: While the section discussing the genetics of bioluminescence provides an accurate outline of the enzymatic processes involved in bioluminescence, namely the Lux Operon, it does not explain in any level of depth the mechanics of that operon or it's significance in the study of bacterial Quorum Sensing. Given that the Lux Operon's notoriety is primarily associated with its occurence in Vibrio Fischeri,should its enzymatic mechanics be given a whole new article or simply added to the existing article on V. Fischeri? --J.michael7 (talk) 02:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion of the 'Genetics of Bioluminescence' Section

message: V. fischeri is now reclassified as Aliivibrio fischeri, see: http://ijs.sgmjournals.org/cgi/content/short/57/12/2823  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.215.113.158 (talk) 11:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassification
Talk:Sergey Chigrakov

message: Is the "A. Chernetskiy" in the article refering to: Arkady Mikhailovich Chernetsky?  BenedictX 17:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No of course. It was :ru:Чернецкий, Александр Владимирович KonstKaras (talk) 15:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Alexander Rahbari

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved as proposed, without opposition. bd2412 T 16:42, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ali Rahbari →  – This is his name, as used on his website www.alexanderrahbari.com and CDs etc. 92.41.104.184 (talk) 21:15, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Please ban Russian trolls editing this article!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3036:26B:1BB9:ECB5:461C:87C1:9D88 (talk) 09:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 May 2019
Category talk:European Space Agency images

message: These images are non free and the foundation has made it pretty clear in recent anouncements that it wants non free images cleaned out.Geni 17:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure that a place can be found for some of them. Many ESA-related pages have nothing else to illustrate them, and since much of the spacecraft are already in space a free alternative would be very hard to produce, wouldn't it? The current policy means that Wikipedia users will never see close-up images of the comet the Rosetta spacecraft is flying to, or indeed, images from any of these otherwise interesting missions, when fair-use is obviously being followed by the majority of them. For instance, a down-sized version of this  could be put on the Rosetta page, to illustrate that a flyby of Mars did occur; with no fear of legal retribution from ESA (which I believe is unlikely anyway). Other thoughts? --Planetary 19:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm not a lawyer, so take whatever I say with a grain of salt. My understanding is that although fair use certainly applies for some images, like illustrations of spacecraft in space (free alternatives would be very hard to get!), it's not for them all, and ESA's partnership with NASA is only limited, so that although Hubble images are fine here, stuff from entirely European (or Japanese) spacecraft is subject to copyright law, as far as I can tell. I must admit that I think that a space agency probably isn't really concerned with suing non-profit organizations like Wikimedia, so this "non-commercial or education use only" debate isn't really valid, in my opinion.--Planetary 05:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

text: NASA images are only in the public domain if the work is NASA's only - as soon as they work with someone else the work is no longer public domain - so that definitly excludes these ESA images. The ESA probably doesn't care much that their images are used here - the thing is that Wikipedia cares, it has principles, kinda refreshing :), sbandrews (t) 17:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: They're still the rules. They may be silly and unnecessary, but someone disagreed, so that's what things are like. No use complaining to change them either. They never will.--Planetary 00:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Out EDP does not allow NC only images. Remeber we have resuers to think of.Geni 18:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair use is allowed which effects reusers just as much if not much more.  Someone can not re use those images with out similar rational.  Otherwise its the re-users responsibility to see that the information is used according to the law.  Even GDU images have restrictions.Chris H 02:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-free
Talk:Madonna and Child

message: Is there a specific reason why Madonna and Child and Madonna (art) are two separate pages? It seems to me that Madonna and Child would make a good subsection for Madonna (art). But before I put a marge tag on these pages, I would like to hear from those who kno wmore about this field. Your comments will be appreciated. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 16:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Madonna (art)]] vs [[Madonna and Child]]
Talk:Danniebelle Hall

message: I am Danniebelle's daughter and the owner of danniebelle.com  I would like to create a WikiPedia page for her. Cyphizzle 01:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I placed the NPOV tag because the article is written by the subject's daughter and doesn't reference any objective sources.  -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 18:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Robert Spencer (doctor)

message: Replaced the links for citation 5 and 6 as the pages had been moved --109.153.91.139 (talk) 23:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replace dead links 

message: Added link from Paul Krassner --109.153.91.139 (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan Article
Talk:Tutte theorem

message: The second part of proof of the theorem does not seem complete to me.  In particular, why is every  connected component of V \setminus U complete?  I am willing to believe that this is a consequence of Tutte's Condition and G^* being maximal without a matching, but it just isn't clear.
: Here is a proof that also covers the case when V \setminus U has components that are not complete. 84.50.78.90 19:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This should remain the main article. The Tutte-Berge formula is a simple consequence of Tutte's theorem via the observation that G has a matching of size k if and only if the graph obtained from G by adding |V|-2k new vertices, each joined to every original vertex of G, has a complete matching. Especially Lime (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

message: The cardinalities of V and E are not mentioned in the article.
Does this mean that the theorem is valid even if one or both of them are infinite?
Whether this is correct or not, it would be a good idea for the article to discuss the issue of V or E possibly being infinite. 2601:200:C000:1A0:21A7:B740:95E6:BA8D (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an infinite version to the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this theorem work for infinite graphs?
Talk:Maximilian II, Holy Roman Emperor

message: How was Maximilian allowed to marry his first cousin  (especially, since she herself was the progeny of first cousins)?  From what I understand, special dispensation from the Pope would have had to have been granted.  If this was simply an effort to unify the European heads of state, having 16 children seems to be the wrong way to go about it. 24.216.65.220 (talk) 01:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would assume a papal dispensation was granted. Paul III would not have been in much of a position to resist the wishes of the Emperor as to his daughter's marriage.  Such dispensations were, in general, regularly given - note that both Philip II and Philip IV of Spain married their own nieces.  Presumably these matches, too, had received papal dispensation. john k (talk) 06:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage
Talk:Francis I, Holy Roman Emperor

message: This page should be moved to Francis I Stephen, Holy Roman Emperor as that was AFAIK the name under which he ruled. Känsterle 09:19, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Why are there no succession boxes for his titles as consort to Maria Theresa: i.e. Archduke consort of Austria, King consort of Bohemia, King consort of Hungary? 74.12.106.108 (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any evidence that he held those titles? Surtsicna (talk) 08:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession boxes as consort 

message: Why no mention of the Pragmatic Sanction of 1713, by which Maria Theresa became Archduchess of Austria and hence (in practice) Empress? This is the only reason he became Emperor. In fact his becoming emperor at all is passed over in one sentence. These are the most important things about his life and they are simply omitted. Escoville (talk) 06:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pragmatic Sanction 
Talk:Henry VI, Holy Roman Emperor

message: It sounds exactly like the history of King Heinrich the Sixth. Also a Holy Roman Emperor...Presidentbalut (talk) 21:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This IS about Heinrich. His name is NOT "Henry".HeinrichMueller (talk) 17:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is not about Henry... 

message: During his last years he negotiated with the Papal States and joined the Crusades.——Heinrich ⅩⅦ von Bayern (talk) 12:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Excommunication by Celestine.
Talk:Ferdinand II, Holy Roman Emperor

message: Something wrong with templates here, top of page.--Shakko (talk) 09:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Templates

message: The table at the bottom of the article needs to be corrected, but as I am not quite sure how to do it I hope someone more able than me will. The point is that Matthias was succeeded in the Archduchy of Austria by his younger surviving brother Archduke Albert (VII), who passed the archduchy on to Emperor Ferdinand II in November 1620. It is only from that moment on that all the Hereditary Lands are reunited (and even then briefly).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richardot (talk • contribs) 15:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession to the Archduchy of Austria

message: He [Ferdinand] was also able to obtain the support of the Spanish Habsburgs in the succession of his cousin Matthias, who was heirless, as Holy Roman Emperor, in exchange for Alsace...
On the other hand, according to Philip III of Spain:
Ferdinand made a successful appeal to Philip's self interest by promising Spain the Habsburg lands in Alsace in return for Spanish support for his [Ferdinand's] election.
Top.Squark (talk) 10:48, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Both entries are correct: The succession in the first quote refers to Ferdinand, not to Matthias (Ferdinand succeeded Matthias, not the other way around). If you are interested in the topic, you need to look for the secret Oñate treaty of March 1617 in the respective literature. Skäpperöd (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with [[Philip III of Spain]]: Alsace in return for what? 

message: ...Ferdinand ordered forced conversion to Catholicism in Bohemia and Austria, causing Protestantism to nearly disappear in the following decades...
Probably the intent is Protestantism in Bohemia and Austria? Hardly Protestantism in Britain, the United Provinces and Scandinavia neatly disappeared.
Top.Squark (talk) 13:18, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously. Skäpperöd (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious: Disappearance of Protestantism? 

message: Ferdinand II is often refered to Ferdinand of Styria, as he was called before he gained power from Charles V. I would suggest making a redirect page from Ferdinand of Styria to this page. 74.95.169.158 (talk) 21:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He gained power from Charles V?  He was born twenty years after Charles V's death...would you like to reformulate that statement? john k (talk) 03:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferdinand of Styria 

message: The article states that the ruler is Ferdinand II, but in the list it appears as Ferdinand III. How can this be reconciled?--Stebunik (talk) 23:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferdinand II or III?
Talk:Ferdinand III, Holy Roman Emperor

message: it might be mentioned he was also an amateur composer, with madrigals to his credit; one, "Chi volge ne la mente", was played on BBC overnight a week ago (schedule listing). (Or to be careful, though no doubts were raised there, one attributed to him. I don't know what scholarship has to say on the matter, right now. Should look into it...) Schissel | Sound the Note! 09:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: If a non-trivial fact...
Talk:Phantom social workers

message: I've removed the Wikiproject banner that was here. i'll also take out the Men in Black reference, which doesn't really apply. Totnesmartin 11:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "paranormal?"  What relationship does this particular body of urban legend bear to paranormal phenomena?  I had never heard of this before I saw the article.  Is there something I'm missing, or is this just another story, like the Men in Black Helicopters, or whatever they call them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.41.40.21 (talk) 17:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the stub - I see no evidence of paranormal discussion. WLU (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paranormal

message: I've removed the following statement and reference:
There were also reports of social workers taking children from parents who had subjected their children to Satanic ritual abuse.
The news story involved actual social workers removing children from their homes, not imaginary ones trying to abduct them.  WLU (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-reference
Talk:Hudson Commodore

message: I have a friend who has a 9 inch chrome replica/model of a 1946 Hudson that was given to her father-in-law when he purchased the actual car in 1946. Is it of any value?
66.159.197.22 17:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

message: It would be great if this article featured other transmission-related technologies by Hudson such as Overdrive, Vacumotive Drive and Super-Matic.
George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 00:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than Drive-Matic.
Talk:Alcohol monopoly

message: This is pretty much exactly like the article in which a mrge is proposed. In the first line of that article the word monopoly and essentially this definition is given. merge asap.--Tainter 17:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is intended to have a worldwide view. /Yvwv 17:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:And–or tree

message: I think I've done OK in wikifying this - though the contents box should be added for future usefulness... I'm not sure. But anyway, someone other than me should judge whether the wikify tag can be removed. :) Thanks! Lottie 17:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

message: The page lacks appropriate references. Logperson (talk) 07:31, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Proskynetarion

message: An editor has suggested that this article be merged with Wayside shrine. The article indicates that proskynetarion has two meanings: 1) a church element, and 2) a wayside shrine. As such, I suggest that a hatnote be added to the article for the second meaning rather than making a complete merger. Doremo (talk) 19:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'm doing it. -geraki TL 07:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with Wayside shrine 

message: We need a good etymology. I've added one for proskynesis, from which proskynetarion is derived, but a) I'm afraid some will mistake it to be the explanation for proskynetarion itself, and b) the significance of the ending -[t]arion. The Greek suffix -arion creates a diminutive, I don't know if the t is here just a connection consonant derived from the final s in proskynesis, or if it changes the meaning of the suffix altogether. Arminden (talk) 07:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology  proskynetarion ← proskynesis
Talk:Romanian Orthodox icons

message: This article has a problem of scope. It is titled "Romanian Orthodox icons" and Romanian icons is a redirect to here. This move blatantly ignores the fact that many icons in Romania belong to other traditions - primarily Greek-Catholic, but also, I would picture, Old Believer and even Roman Catholic or Oriental Orthodox. Since at least info on Greek-Catholic icons is much present in bibliographic reference for this phenomenon (and glass icons are in any case had their Greek-Catholic masters), and since the artistic sides of each contribution are not as distinct as to warrant separate articles, I would suggest moving this article back to "Romanian icons" and keeping "Ro Orth" as the redirect. Thoughts? Dahn (talk) 10:16, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title and scope
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Transcendental Meditation

message: About 10 days ago I lost all interest in debating anything with the TM pages and so just wanted to clearly state that I am removing myself from the mediation. 
I thank Stevertigo for trying to help out. 
Thank you thank you thank you. :)
I do not see myself editing those pages anytime in the near future or participating in any of the disucssions. I'll say more about this when the time is right. Sethie 20:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing myself from the mediation
Talk:Louis the Younger

message: He reigned over a great part of East Francia. His territory was more than Saxony, it included also Francia (todays Franconia and Hassia) and great parts of Lothringia (todays Rheinland and Palatinate). So why only "king of Saxony"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManfredV (talk • contribs) 21:25, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "king of Saxony"? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 23:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Louis the Younger →  – There are several other monarchs called "Louis the Younger", which isn't a distinctive name for itself. The epithet only makes sense in Louis' own times, so it would make more sense to refer to him based on the territory he inherited (just like Carloman of Bavaria). Tintero21 (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 October 2022
Talk:Baron HolmPatrick

message: Looking at  it would seem that the present baron's son is illegitimate (married '84 born '82), the second son has no issue so the line looks to be going to the only son of the youngest brother ie Ross Andrew James Hamilton b 1990 Unless any1 has any other details. Alci12 17:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Molière Award

message: The French wiki has pages devoted to the awards from various years.  Enterprising editors may wish to translate those pages and incorporate the material on award winners into the English wiki. --NYArtsnWords 21:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Nihari

message: Firstly, Nihaari from Hyderabad Deccan is quite different than the traditional Nihaari. Secondly the guys talking about "Pakistani Nihaari better than Indian" should first taste the Nihaari either in old Delhi or Lucknow or in Noor Mohammadi (Bombay) & Chinese n Grill (Bombay). People are invited to taste both and make their comments! Sagheero (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nihari is a dish from Delhi and we make the best nihari in old Delhi, from beef, and it's an Indian cuisine dish not Pakistani so get that straight and tell your goddamn country men to accept facts 93.224.165.99 (talk) 01:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

text: What nihari is, what would you Pakistanis know, if you want to have real nihari come to old Delhi, have real nihari, it's an indian dish, from north Indian mughali cuisine, not punjabi or sindhi cusine 93.224.165.99 (talk) 01:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Spamming

message: instead of to the category. Abeg92contribs 18:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I made [[E-mail authentication]] link directly to the article,

message: I removed the webring link, since there is no content at webring or spamdexing that justifies a link from this template. GunnarHj (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Webring link removed
Talk:George W. Hart

message: What happened to the earlier version of this page? (I created it summer 2006, just after the "Bridges" conference)
::::Johnbibby 18:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:L'Arroseur Arrosé

message: According to this reference the name of the boy was Daniel Duval, but according to imdb, it's Benoit Duval. Currently it's listed as Daniel in the text and as Benoit the infobox... does anyone know how to tell which is the correct name of the actor? Feeeshboy 22:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Young Mr. Duval
Talk:The Charlie Brown and Snoopy Show

message: Who was it made by? 99.230.152.143 13:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Production

message: , Vol. 11, no. 6, October/November 1993: pp. 30, 32-34, 36, 40, 58.</ref> Cartoon Network on June 3, 2002 before Hamtaro premeried until May 30, 2005, Nickelodeon and Nicktoons Network (under the title You're on Nickelodeon, Charlie Brown) in the 1990s. In Canada, it aired on YTV in 2001-2007. It re-aired with the Charlie Brown specials on the UK channel Boomerang in 2002. Currently, the last time the show aired on American television was in April 2005.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihazchessburger (talk • contribs) 04:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed material 

message: Hello all.
I have created You're on Nickelodeon, Charlie Brown as a redirect to this article. I hope this was a helpful and worthwhile addition.
Cheers. Baleaf (talk) 03:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New redirect
Talk:Rhode Island Route 1A

message: Does the fifth segment really rejoin US 1 at the Narragansett Rotary? There are reassurance markers in Wakefield indicating that Route 1A has a concurrency with Route 108 along Kingstown Rd. and then heads into Historic Wakefield via Main Street and Post Rd. before finally rejoining Route 1 at the southern end of its controlled-access freeway section. This additional routing through Wakefield is not signed in many street atlases, but it is described on USRoute1.net and, as I said above, indicated by reassurance markers in Wakefield. In addition, the image in this article shows the routing that extends beyond the Narragansett Rotary. Cheers, Rai•me 20:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Terminus of the "Fifth Segment"