Talk:Pyotr Bagration

message: We need to replace the orphaned stub Pyotr Ivanovich Bagration with this article, which to pity goes under wrong name as sugested by transliteration rules. DmitryKo 14:54, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. violet/riga (t) 23:34, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that was a mistake. It isn't a transliterated name. It was a translated one. — LlywelynII 22:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Pyotr Ivanovich Bagration 

message: :In Russian, it would be pronounced bah-GRAH-tee-awn
Isn't it bah-grah-tee-AWN? RJ CG (talk) 17:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not based on the IPA we currently have. Is it wrong? — LlywelynII 20:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian pronunciation

message: .... and in Georgian it would be BAGRATIONI. So what's your point ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.196.88.26 (talk) 10:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Georgian 

message: The word "Bagration" is probably a greek-root word, comes from "pangration" or in greek script "pagkration", from words "pan" means all and "kratos" means power. When, in greek, a noun makes an adjective, one form is the adding of an "i"* after the theme of the word (e.g. ouranos - ouranios οὐρανός οὐράνιος: heaven - heavenly). So, the word "pagkration" means "allmighty", something like the address "your majesty" for the western kings. The address "pangratie" (vocative case) is reasonable for the members of a royal family.
"Pangration" is also aν ancient sport like wrestling in which the fighter gives all his power to win.
(the other form is the adding of "ik" -latin: "ic", e.g. basis - basic)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.107.197.214 (talk) 05:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems off-topic. The etymology of the dynastic name belongs at the dynasty's article, not here. — LlywelynII 21:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bagration" is probably a greek root word 

message: Not being a reader of Vietnamese, I guess it was a misplacement.
Could the original write re-check, correct or explain why such a reference ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.120.156 (talk) 15:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference #3 in Vietnamese 

message: So I've decided to add numerous sections including his decicive involvment in some of the campaigns, wars, battles that are listed. I would be more than pleased if any other wikipedians assisted me and all the others who participate, with more information about Bagration's involvments in any of the wars he participated, with reference, source, quotes etc, the style that's being used right now. TheMightyGeneral (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  UPDATE 2014 

message: In fact, yes, the numbers are so strong the name should just be moved back to where it started at Peter Bagration. — LlywelynII 22:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: I'm not saying the Genealogy section was a bad idea or couldn't work, but it doesn't need to be a page-long table if the only information being provided is a single list of his ancestors. There's also no need for the generic "Kartli Branch" to start with the great-great-great-great-grandfathers when his importance to Levan and Levan's importance to him is minimal. If others would like to keep it, I suggest shortening it to three or four generations and fleshing out the rest of the family tree. If that's too large or unwieldy to fit here, add the details to the Kartli dynasty family tree page. 
Table commented out below:
 — LlywelynII 21:45, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Genealogy

message: Pending a scholarly expert adopting the page, annotating and curating the list, it's pretty worthless to just randomly list volumes about Bagration. Kindly restore these as they're used to source statements in the article:
* General Bagration: Sbornik dokumentov i materialov, pod redaktsiei S.N. Golubova [General Bagration: Compilation of Documents and Materials], (Moscow, 1945)
* Bagration v Dunaiskikh kniazhestvakh: Sbornik Dokumentov [Bagration in the Danubian Principalities: Compilation of Documents], (Chisineu, 1949)
* . 
* . 
* . 
* . 
* . 
 — LlywelynII 22:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Pyotr Bagration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921155244/http://www.royalhouseofgeorgia.ge/home to http://www.royalhouseofgeorgia.ge/home
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051025065033/http://web2.airmail.net/napoleon/index.html to http://web2.airmail.net/napoleon/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The temptation is to treat it like an English noun. Presumably that's wrong. 99.229.34.174 (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English pronunciation? 

message: Do I even need to explain how profoundly stupid it is to delete the Russian spelling of one of the most famous generals in the Russian Empire? And this is obviously politically motivated trolling, and this nonsense only started in the past 18 months. The USA has famous Native American soldiers who are fluent in their tribal language. Is Wikipedia going to delete all the English spellings of their names too? That's literally how stupid this is. - Ian 31.135.78.18 (talk) 19:53, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Delete the Russian Spelling?