lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KOLN

message: I believe that a separate KNPL-LD article needs to be made because even though it started as a satellite of KOLN/KGIN, it is now acted as a semi-satellite, and now have separate evening newscast that doesn't duplicate with the main KOLN's newscast. I think because of this, I think the KNPL needs to be in a separate article. Csworldwide1 (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  KNPL-LD 
Talk:Pedro Pablo Ramírez

message: There is no academic consensus that Pedro Pablo Ramírez was a Fascist, nor are there any reliable sources indicating this either, the sources being used to describe him as a Fascist apparently are from 1943, at a time when the U.S. was pressuring Argentina to cut ties with the Axis powers and declare war on them, I don't think this is a reliable source. -- 138.122.83.177 (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there more recent reliable sources contravening these earlier sources? Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that this accusation isn't even treated seriously by modern sources, it seems no modern source tries to even respond to it, not does any source tries to seriously argue that the was a Fascist either, so it does seem pretty much that this is just Allied propaganda, to treat it as a fact would be something very unencyclopedic. -- 138.122.83.66 (talk) 06:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not good enough.  We have reliable sources that claim he was a fascist, or at least leaned that way, and no reliable sources which contradict that, so that article stays as it is. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Apart from the fact that the reliability of the source claiming that he was a fascist is rather dubious, what you're proposing goes against WP:CATDEF, which states that sources must consistently and commonly define said person as X or Y, but sources don't consistently and commonly define him as a fascist. -- 201.20.90.223 (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You've yet to provide a single citation from any source to support your contention. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any modern sources which describe him as a fascist? Since you're the one making the changes, technically you need to provide them to justify it, a wartime source is not enough to describe him as a fascist. -- 201.20.127.160 (talk) 21:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The information in the article is sourced. Your attempt to confuse matters by ignoring sourcing requirmeents will not work. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Like I said, you need more than 1 source in order to label him as a fascist, and the source's reliability is dubious, you're basically imposing a POV, not hard to understand. -- 201.20.127.160 (talk) 00:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fascism
Talk:KPBT-TV

message: Apparently, there'll be a new PBS Kids subchannel that will launch on July 6th. Since there's no link to an article of any means, and since I live in the DFW metroplex, you'll just have to believe me.
https://image.pbs.org/bento3-prod/kpbt-bento-live-pbs/Images/menu%20images/4013bc29ae_247PBSKIDS.png
Can someone living in the region edit this page? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marioedit8 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  PBS Kids Channel?
Talk:Pedro Vélez

message: Hello,
I commented out one of the infoboxes as it is in the wrong place and I also feel it is wrong. The infobox is about his political career it seems and there is a spot for that already in the article. Since I am not very versed on this subject, I am deferring this to someone who can read Spanish and fix the infobox.
Bakertheacre Chat/My Contibutions 20:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commented out Infobox Suggestion
Talk:Peggy Neely

message: This individual is not notable enough to warrant an article. Moreover, the article appears to be largely created / edited by one person, who also happened to have a professional photo to release to the public domain. I think the article should be deleted. --TrustTruth (talk) 22:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Article should be deleted per Notability criterion. --Eustress (talk) 23:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag
Talk:Peljidiin Genden

message: The article says that Genden was a moderate socialist, but Bawden's History of Mongolia says he was one of the leaders of the leftist deviation in (roughly) 1928-32.Yaan 13:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And what does "leftist deviation" exactly mean in conceptual terms? "Deviation" sounds like something the MPRP would define to mean just about anything they didn't like...  --Latebird 18:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Most sources I've seen explicitly state that he opposed excessive collectivization. If Bawden says the opposite, then that should probably be referenced in the text. Btw: "Church" implies a christian context. I'm changing that to "clergy", which is a bit more general than the "monks" of the original version. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Latebird (talk • contribs) 17:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. What kind of sources have you seen? In Bawden's work one reference is on page 296: "[...][Gendung] had in fact been one of the most active leftist leaders, and is mentioned as such in Sambuu's autobiography, along with other extremists, such as Shijee and Badrakh. Gendung had been a member of the secretariat of the Central Committee, and had been responsible for running the campaign for the expropriation of the property of the nobles, and the liquidation of the nobles themselves, in North Khangai aimak, soon to be one of the hottest beds of disaffection. Sambuu took his orders from Gendung when carrying out his share of the campaign. [...]". I think Udo B.Barkmanns Geschichte der Mongolei says the same, but it's back in the library and I can't check now. Yaan 17:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've only seen online sources, which are probably less reliable than your books. Why don't you list those under references, btw?  --Latebird 18:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leftist deviation 

message: The Buddhist clergy is not well suited, I think. Instead, you can use the Lama(s). In Mongolian, it is spelled Лам. The lama is the general title given to the Buddhist teacher. So the single word Lama refers to both the meanings; Buddhist and clergy. There are instances such as Khamba Lama and Dalai Lama. Bilguun.alt (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think the English term Clergy describes exactly what is meant here. It also doesn't require the reader to know what a Lama is, and how exactly that word is used in Mongolian. --Latebird (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Buddhist clergy
Talk:Baby Guinness

message: I propose to restore (and improve through copyediting) the content lost when this article was turned, without discussion, into a redirect. A number of other articles link here (fruitlessly at present, since enquiries are now redirected to a site which incorporates no material on the subject of the title). Other articles linked from List of cocktails have not had their contents deleted, so I see no reason why Baby Guinness should have been treated differently. --Picapica 22:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I absolutely agree. I restored the article. --89.57.30.56 00:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoral

message: I'd always heard that this drink was made with black sambuca, not tia. (?)
:I have only ever seen this drink made with black Sambuca. I'm surprised that is the variant and not the coffee version. Viciouslies (talk) 02:41, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Variant?
Talk:Jeremiah Day

message: E. Brook's Holifield's work "Theology in America" attributes the work'Examination of President Edward's Inquiry into the Freedom of the Will" as being published by Albert Taylor Bledsoe in 1845. This should be verified and an adit should be made ot the articles if this is right.
nic gibson —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.81.76.27 (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible error 

message: The entire career section, especially the third paragraph, seems to me to have a strong positive bias. Walmas (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?

message: :There is content that is hard to read and understand. I read it a couple of times and it still didn't make any sense: "On January 14, 1805, he married Martha, the daughter of the Hon. Roger Sherman and Rebecca Minot Prescott , they had one son child Sherman Day and she died in 1806; and on September 24, 1811, Olivia, daughter of Major Daniel and Olive (Tinker) Jones of Hartford, Connecticut.".
:I fancy myself as a fairly knowledgeable reader but this is confusing to me. Does "...and she died in 1806" mean Martha died? Did he marry "Olivia" on September 24, 1811? As presented it makes it seem one son child (is this British English?) Sherman Day was either really a girl or there is a mistake meaning "he". "She" is a pronoun and it is not, as far as I know, common to dangle it after a proper noun such as Sherman Day but referencing the mother at the beginning of the sentence. Otr500 (talk) 23:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career section
Talk:Peter Baker (British politician)

message: Looking at these edits, I'm going to revert them for the time being as they seem uncertain and unsourced. There was also a photograph inserted and then removed, and it would be very useful if we could use that. Does the editor need help with their contributions? --Pete (talk) 15:36, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting additions 

message: This seems a very long and detailed article for an MP with WW2 service who became bankrupt. Most of the text is supported by one primary source. This could usefully be trimmed down to a few paragraphs. --Pete (talk) 03:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just how notable is this guy?
Talk:Peter Bawden

message: I have a lot more reference materials from our family archives, but it's quite time-consuming to scan them all. Over time I will add more references. In the meantime, if anybody questions the authenticity of the information provided on the Peter Bawden page, most of it can be verified through various Google searches. Please discuss on this talk page prior to making any significant changes or reversions so we can achieve consensus and not hurt anybody's feelings. Thank you. Sgc4a (talk) 05:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Peter C. Eagler

message: Not important enough to maintain a page on Wikipedia.207.38.156.111 (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article Will be Removed 
Talk:William M. Evarts

message: I am putting this comment on top to save you from reading the rest. As Gilda Radner's Emily Litella used to say, "Nevermind." I think that I’ve solved the problem. It was a typo in Carwardine's essay: "Evarts" should have been "Everts." In the unlikely event that anyone wants the details, write to my Talk page. Maurice Magnus (talk) 02:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Evarts a Baptist minister?
Talk:Peter Early

message: The items moved to external links were used by me as refernces to write the article. I can appreciate you wanting that format, but it takes away from the point that the majority of the article info came from the congressional entry.  I think it should be moved back to references. The gravesite guide should definitely be moved back. Thought I would mention here for possible discussion before changing it back. --Roswell native 03:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformating from references to external links

message: No mention of slave-owning. I feel that this category should be restricted to people whose slave-owning history was notable in itself. Valetude (talk) 06:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American slave owners
Talk:Quintette du Hot Club de France

message: Where is it? 1Z (talk) 15:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Added section with cross link to relevant section of "Django Reinhardt" entry. Tony 1212 (talk) 23:43, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography
Talk:Save Room (song)

message: I've just this information regarding the video:
"In a interview John said the concept of the video was that his girl keeps changing personalities on him that's why there are so many different women.Each woman represents a different personality. It wasn't that he was sleeping﻿ with different women. If you notice the woman at the end is the same woman in his bed in the beginning of video. He's trying to convince her to stop changing. He wants her to stay, but she keeps changing. Listen closely to his lyrics!"
Maybe someone could include that into the article, which is misleading at the moment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.254.64.176 (talk) 15:56, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  the video
Talk:Peter Heenan

message: There is also a botanist, specialist in Fabaceae:
P.B.Heenan
--Penarc 23:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idAuthorSearch.do?id=35953-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvAuthorSearch.do%3Ffind_abbreviation%3D%26find_surname%3DHeenan%26find_isoCountry%3D%26find_forename%3D%26output_format%3Dnormal Peter B. Heenan]
Talk:KSPX-TV

message: https://uk.reuters.com/article/ion-media-ma-e-w-scripps/update-3-ew-scripps-scales-up-with-265-bln-berkshire-backed-deal-for-ion-media-idUKL3N2GL2J6
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/buffett-backs-ew-scripps-to-buy-ion-media-2020-9-1029619184#
As of 2020 there is a report that Warren Buffet is named as one of the investors of the Ion/Scripps deal if it is approved2601:640:C600:3C20:E98A:665F:EF71:8FF1 (talk) 15:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: KSPX-TV to move to Scripps if deal is approved
Talk:Peter Hulme-Cross

message: See this website and comment by Peter Hulme Cross bellow. --Dezidor (talk) 12:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veritas membership 

message: Could we have a date-of-birth, as standard on wiki pages? Valetude (talk) 21:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  D.o.B?
Talk:Wing Cap

message: I'm not sure if this article could be made quite long enough to be a seperate article. Maybe it could be redirected to Super Mario 64? -- TheGreatLlama (speak to the Llama!) 22:17, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Keep"--Java7837 05:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can, please give reasons as to why this should be kept. — MalcolmUse the schwartz! 14:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

text: If someone searched the word "Wing Cap", we could simply redirect that page to Super Mario 64, and the person would look at the appropriate part of the article. I don't see how a seperate article for this is necessary. — MalcolmUse the schwartz! 21:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Super Mario 64
Talk:KTBN-TV

message: KTBN used to have 10 translators in Southern California in the 1990s-2000s like K63CG for Palm Springs, and channel 65 for Twentynine Palms, but they were moved to channel 53. There were translators for San Diego, Yuma (AZ), Ridgecrest and San Luis Obispo, but I can't find the channel and call sign (hard to find them online). Unless KTBN has a more powerful signal to transmit across the topography of Southern California, the station doesn't have low-power translators anymore. 2605:E000:FDCA:4200:1FA:3A88:955:CACC (talk) 01:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KTFK-DT

message: *Telefutura Launches Full-Power Station KTFK in Sacramento
*Media outlets catering to a high concentration of Latinos top general-market counterparts
*Univision Commends Diego Ruiz on His Appointment to the Federal Communications Commission
*Region moves up list of top U.S. Hispanic TV markets —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Morenooso (talk • contribs) 06:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources
Talk:Jean Baptiste Joseph Delambre

message: Delambre contributed to the remarks about Ptolemy made by Tycho.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.170.8 (talk) 10:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tycho 

message: I am just wondering why M. Legendre appears in this article when neither Delambre nor any other member of the expedition appears in the Legendre article. I would be grateful for any elucidation OsmNacht (talk) 15:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The quick answer is that the articles were written at different times by different people with little (probably zero) coordination.  Another thing to consider is that Delambre's geodesic work was a major aspect of his career, whereas Legendre is much better known for other things.  I'm sure both articles can be improved and you should feel to do so. cffk (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adrien-Marie Legendre 

message: French Wikipedia renders the name Jean-Baptiste Joseph Delambre (which to me implies Jean-Baptiste as a first name, Joseph as a middle name), but Mac Tutor and Britannica both say Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Delambre (which to me implies all 3 are part of the first name). Does anyone know more authoritatively how many of these should be considered part of the given name vs. middle name(s), and how it should be hyphenated? –jacobolus (t) 04:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This page of Histoire de l'astronomie ancienne has "J.-B.-J. Delambre", as does the title page of Grandeur et figure de la terre, which implies all three names should be hyphenated. But I also saw another book with "J. B. J. Delambre" on the title page. Confusing. The source for the French Wikipedia hyphenation seems to be this Lithograph by Boilly (made a couple years before Delambre’s death, but depicting him much younger) which says "LE CHEVALIER DELAMBRE, (Jean-Baptiste, Joseph.)" at the bottom. –jacobolus (t) 05:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to the originals from 1799 and 1806, listed under Works, his first names don't need to be hyphenated.Taksen (talk) 05:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean the title page of Méthodes analytiques pour la détermination d'un arc du méridien, which has "J. B. J. Delambre" on it? –jacobolus (t) 06:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Ken Alder's book The Measure of all Things also uses Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Delambre throughout, as does the English Cyclopaedia (1856) while the Dictionary of Scientific Biography says Jean-Baptiste Joseph Delambre. –jacobolus (t) 06:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  how many of these names should be hyphenated?
Talk:Peter Lassen

message: An IP editor changed Lassen's date of birth, so I thought I would look in to this.  August 7, 1800 is reported by the Red Bluff Beacon in 1859, the SF Chronicle in 1893 and Fairfield in 1916.
The first report on newspapers.com that I found for October 31, 1800 is in a 1937 Oakland Tribune article that refers to a book Peter Lassen of California edited by Vogel-Jorgensen and written in Danish.  Because of the vagaries of how search works on newspapers.com, there could be other, earlier sources.  In 1940, Swartzlow also uses the October 31, 1800 date. October 31, 1800 is reported by Johnston(2012).  Johnston's bibliography refers to the Vogel-Jorgensen work in the bibliography. 
My guess is that Vogel-Jorgensen and subsequent authors were able to look at church or other records that indicate the October 31, 1800 date.  I think we should go with October 31, 1800 for Lassen's date of birth.Cxbrx (talk) 22:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Lassen's Date of Birth
Talk:KTVN

message: The KTVN terms of use states that “All content included in or made available through the Service, and the functionality of the Service, including the text, logos, designs, icons, software, scripts, source code, graphics, photos, images, likenesses, domain names, interactive features and the like, and the trade secrets, trademarks, trade names, service marks, and copyrights contained therein, are owned by KTVN or its content suppliers and are proprietary and protected by U.S. and other applicable intellectual property law. No express or implied rights are conferred on you to use such content. The compilation of all content through the Service is the exclusive intellectual property of KTVN and protected by U.S. and other applicable copyright law. Except as explicitly permitted by these Terms or the functionality of the Service”; judging off of that, I would think that the KTVN logo is copyrighted and that someone needs to put a non-free rationale tag rather than a CC-BY-SA tag. 
If someone can please substantiate the Creative Commons license, then great. Otherwise, there needs to be a non-free rationale, rather than a Creative Commons tag. I also think that someone should remove the file from Commons if it is indeed copyrighted. 2601:5C5:4201:68B0:E97E:DDFF:D30:80CC (talk) 07:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone please figure out for sure whether or not the KTVN logo is licensed??
Talk:The Legend of Zelda CD-i games

message: sources  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.209.247.135 (talk) 08:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  the king 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: CD-i games from The Legend of Zelda series →  – Per WP:CONCISE. (There is also a problem with the formatting of "The" in title right now — see conversation above — but that is probably moot.) Popcornfud (talk) 13:52, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 July 2022
Talk:Peter Plympton Smith

message: This article is full of grammatical errors, including sentences without verbs and missing articles. It badly needs copy-editing.Bill 06:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammatical errors

message: The claim that Harvard does not agree with Smith's claims about his educational credentials is quite serious. On the one hand, it should be more specific. What exactly is disputed? And on the other hand, better documentation is needed. Where did the Registrar say this?
Bill 04:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Educational Credentials

message: Much of the language used here rings of vanity "prominent" "prolific" etc. His father was a banker in a small rural city of 28,000 people, if that qualifies as a prominent banker then we have hundreds of thousands of them. If the subject did not write this, perhaps his brother or a friend did. If he is unaware of this he should note that the article formerly listed him as author of a book that his name does not appear on the cover of but contributed to along with organizational staff. To have authored a single in print book under his name does not merit the description "a prolific education writer." really. CApitol3 02:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vanity language