Talk:Human sexuality

message: The text currently reads . However, it is a matter of WP:BLUESKY that abstinence-only is the teaching Sexual abstinence and no other form of birth control. I would not question the text were the link to abstinence or to sexual abstinence, or if the pipe and descriptive phrase were removed, e.g., . See this edit and this edit for context. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 10:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: your last edit was too biased. And yes I agree that it should say only. Honestly that's what I thought it said and I consider it a type on my part. Thank you for bringing this up. It is obviously a big distinction Tjpolega (talk) 11:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abstience versus abstinence-only 

message: Early on in this article, this is present re nature vs nurture and extent of homosexuality. Njsm11 (talk) 02:19, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dichotomous thinking 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Cisgender sexuality and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 8#Cisgender sexuality until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cisgender sexuality" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The following passage is overly specific:
"Oxytocin, sometimes referred to as the 'love hormone,' is released in both sexes during sexual intercourse when an orgasm is achieved."  In particular, the phrase "during sexual intercourse" is not a necessary part of every situation "when an orgasm is achieved" i.e. during orgasm.  Orgasm doesn't require sexual intercourse.  No matter whether the quoted source includes that phrase, the facts need to be stated as simply as possible. yoyo (talk) 06:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxytocin release during orgasm 

message: A recent edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_sexuality&diff=prev&oldid=1121873947) removed the word proximity from "" via WP;JWB, I reverted that edit and SchreiberBike reinstated the change with the comment . However, close is an adjective, not a noun, so the sentence is now grammatically incorrect. Either  or   would be grammatically correct. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 16:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. I'm just trying around with my new JWB power and accidentally make a crater on the ground. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. I didn't read the full context. Please consider me whacked with a wet trout.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  16:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits by CactiStaccingCrane and SchreiberBike 

message: It feels like a disappointing oversight that there is not even so much as a mention of atypical sexual interests, fetishism, kinks, paraphilia, etc., despite the fact that they are a unique and interesting part of human sexuality. Sexual fetishes are not so uncommon as to be an invalid or non-noteworthy part of human sexuality, and so I hope that we can figure out a reasonable way to work them into this article. FuwaFuwaDL (talk) 08:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What sexual fetishes are you referring to? Justanotherguy54 (talk) 06:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm talking about in a general sense, there is no mention of paraphilic (fetish) interests or behavior in this page on human sexuality. FuwaFuwaDL (talk) 15:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not even so much as a mention of fetishism/kinks/paraphilias? 

message: please fill in a source for the ref you named "rodriguez". -- Fyrael (talk) 19:29, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the empty citation as the other citation appeared to support the claim. Zenomonoz (talk) 20:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undefined ref