lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Richard Peters (Atlanta)

message: The dedicated author's source material is moved here from the article:
*Nellie Peters Black (1851-1919) "Nellie Peters was born in Atlanta on February 9, 1851, the eldest of nine children. Her father, Richard Peters, emerged from the Civil War to become a financial and civic leader in postwar Atlanta. After graduating from finishing school, Nellie joined her family in their philanthropic and charitable endeavors. Devoutly religious and a staunch Episcopalian, she taught Sunday school and organized the city's first mission. At age twenty-six she married George Robison Black, a congressman from Screven County. The couple had three children before George Black died in 1886."
*Interesting Facts About Atlanta "Atlanta was originally named Marthasville. After a the governers daughter. A man named Richard Peters, who was the superintendent of the Georgia Railroad, suggested that the name be changed because it was too long to fit on train schedules. He suggested "Atlanta" which was dervied from the Western & Atlantic depot. The name was officially adopted in 1845."
*EDWARD C. PETERS HOUSE "Located on a wooded block between downtown Atlanta and the new skyscrapers at Midtown, the Edward C. Peters House is one of the finest and earliest surviving examples of domestic architecture from Atlanta's post-Civil War period. The Mansion site is all that remains of a 400- acre tract that stretched to the present site of Georgia Tech on the west to the Sears site on the east and from Crawford Long Hospital on the south to Piedmont Park on the north." 
--Jerzy·t 04:42, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Goods and services

message: importance of goods and services 102.2.83.148 (talk) 06:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goods and services  

message: In the current article the terms are explained as a spectrum and nothing is exactly one or the other, but from management point of view goods are clearly distinguished from services and there is no mix between them.
The difference is with the ownership of the initial state of the object. When a company sells goods, they are the property of the enterprise completely and throughout, while when a company performs a service, the object is the property of the client. I wrote an example of the article here Goods and services (management): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
What is everyone's opinion? In my opinion the current information does not define and differentiates between goods and services at all due to the spectrum situation and goods-services continuum. In management practice it is not like that. Leonard Gauthier (talk) 15:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement on goods and services definition
Talk:Jeff Bagwell

message: There seems to be a great deal of POV in this article, and I'm going to have a go at presenting a balanced view of things, per the intent of this encyclopaedia. Bagwell was a great player, one of the greatest first basemen ever, but if he walked on water, that should be covered on a blog somewhere by his fans. A summation of a human being would seem appropriate here. Hushpuckena (talk) 22:27, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:1996 British Columbia general election

message: Elections BC calls the tories the "B.C. Conservative Party" here and the "Progressive Conservative Party of British Columbia" here.
They are referring to the same political party though.
Is there an official source on this name?
Upon further research, I believe the "Progressive Conservative Party of British Columbia" mention to be a mistake as I have found other references to the "B.C. Conservative Party" here in Elections BC's 1995/96 Annual Report as being registered as of Dec 31, 1996. Also, they were registered as the "B.C. Conservative Party" in the 1991 election, too. maclean25 02:42, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: CP
Talk:Henry Vansittart

message: How can someone be a rake!? Enochlau 05:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From the article, it looks like he was appointed the governor in 1759 but took the office in 1760. It would be better if we clear up the ambiguity. The intro has it as 1759-64 but it is 1760-64 (it was 1765 till a moment ago) in Governor of Bengal. Britannica uses 1760-64. Tintin (talk) 00:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bengal Governor 

message: The principal companion in the three man commission of which Vansittart was part is named as "Lord Scruton".  Although it may have been in the writer's source, this is erroneous as I have found no such title person in reference works on the peerage or in the Dictionary of National Biography.  The two others, confirmed in their respective articles in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, were LUKE SCRAFTON and Francis Forde.  I have therefore deleted Lord Scruton and substituted Luke Scrafton.Cloptonson (talk) 14:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Companions on Last Voyage
Talk:52 pickup

message: I don't get how a card game is a spoiler. WikiFan04ß 00:18, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT)
:I don't get why it is being called a card game. 70.20.216.117 15:51, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is a spoiler because you will not be able to play it as the second player after reading it... --seifip 14:01, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is that supposed to mean? Damaged children? I'm going to reword that to say "damaged cards and/or injured children".
75.182.106.197 05:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Damaged cards and/ or children"? 

message: How are sources needed???  This is common knowledge.
71.230.83.11 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All the more reason. If something can be easily sourced, getting info for it is not only good maintence of the idea that verified information is stronger than unverified, but good practice for times when things more disputed, or at the very least, not necessarily considered "common knowledge" are being discussed. I'm aware the comment above me is from two years ago, I just stumbled across this talk page, had some free time, and thought it was a point worth making I suppose. -Sgore (talk) 05:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "unverifiable/sources needed"?
Talk:East Jersey

message: *Against merger I see no reason to merge with West Jersey; the two provinces were separate, and matters which concern only one - including the present status of the Proprietors - should be in the individual articles. Common matters should go in Province of New Jersey. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I have noticed that Thomas Jefferson, who was born well after East Jersey and West Jersey had gotten back together again, referred to New Jersey as "the Jerseys" (see his account of the Declaration of Independence's formation), as well as to Delaware as being the "Delaware counties". I wonder how long old place names persist, anyhow. 204.52.215.107 15:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "The Jerseys"
Talk:Gordon Spring, Georgia

message: From WP:RfD:
* Gordon Spring, Georgia, Gordons, Georgia, Gordons, Gordon Spring, Gordon Springs → Gordon Springs, Georgia --- The article Gordon Springs, Georgia is up for VfD because the town doesn't exist. User:SPUI modified the Gordon Springs, Georgia page to describe an unremarkable creek that does exist instead. He then created all five of the above redirect pages to point to the page that is still up for VfD. One of these redirects (Gordons) is referred to by the article Archibald Campbell, 2nd Earl of Argyll in reference to a clan of the same name. --Durin 05:43, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:H-infinity methods in control theory

message: It's somewhat misleading to refer to this as a tool for finding optimal controllers.  Technically, it is correct, since we are trying to minimize the error outputs z and hence we introduce some notion of optimality.  However, especially in relation to robust control, \mathcal{H}_{\infty} controllers tend to be quite conservative and suboptimal in practical senses (tending to be sluggish and/or high-order controllers) - since the underlying problem is to find a stabilizing controller for a whole set of plants.  I thought I should open this as discussion rather than edit the page since it's more of a semantics argument than a cut-and-dry technical change.  M0nstr42, 05:46, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a paragraph to explain this point of view. --Orzetto 21:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: More to the point, surely \mathcal{H}_{\infty} is itself a particular Hardy Space?  We probably all mean \mathcal{H}_{\infty} Control.
My instructor uses the phrase "optimization-based control", which is a little less ambiguous. Nfette (talk) 22:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 2005 

message: Can anyone add a Chapter about nonlinear H_{\infty} control? Thanks مبتدئ (talk) 23:03, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Or at least how LMIs, real bounded lemma, Ricatti etc fit into this framework. Best regards مبتدئ (talk) 07:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: Stupid question, but what is s in the equation? Time? Or has the time-dynamics already been Laplace-transformed? This is not written anywhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin.friedrich (talk • contribs) 20:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: What is s
Template talk:R from alternative name

message: redirects here. Is that desirable? Should we add wording to this template and/or its documentation directing editors looking for "r to pseudonym" to check whether  or  is applicable? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "R to pseudonym" redirect 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Template:Redirect from maiden name. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12#Template:Redirect from maiden name until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Template:Redirect from maiden name" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Template:R from slang name. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12#Template:R from slang name until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Template:R from slang name" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Remove .  is a separate template. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 20:45, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 10:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 7 May 2022 

message: The redirect Template:R from native name has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Place Clichy (talk) 16:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Template:R from native name]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Make "not necessary" in the second paragraph a piped link to the page WP:NOTBROKEN. Loytra (talk) 13:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: in good faith. If this is controversial, other template editors are welcome to revert while discussion happens. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 31 January 2024
Template talk:R from alternative language

message: The redirect Template:R from native name has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Place Clichy (talk) 17:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Template:R from native name]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: When there is no language specified, there should be hyphenation in the phrase "as-yet-undetermined language", being that it is a compound adjective.   — TARDIS builder✉     •       04:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: thank you very much for this correction! and it has been . P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 04:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pedantic hyphenation
Category talk:Particle physics

message: Why is Nuclear Physics part of the particle physics category?  This makes no sense.  Nuclear Physics is widely recognized as its own separate part of physics, with its own paradigms (understanding how systems of partons (quarks and gluons) work together, and how systems of nucleons work together. It has separate funding sources (i.e. the U. S. Dept. of Energy Office of Nuclear Physics is not part of the DOE Office of High Energy Physics), it's own physics classes, etc.  
I am new to wikipedia; would anybody ('the system') mind if I moved this?
Spencer Klein, Berkeley, spencerklein@berkeley.edu  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpencerKlein (talk • contribs) 21:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that motion! I think it is only justified as far as nuclei are (composite) particles. But I agree that nuclear physics is not particle physics in the same sense in which chemistry is not physics.  Alex4532 (talk) 13:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

text: I'd like to continue this discussion in the Category talk:Nuclear physics Alex4532 (talk) 13:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear Physics part of Particle Physics
Talk:Media ownership in Australia

message: I reverted a large copy/paste job that added content from http://www.aba.gov.au/newspubs/radio_TV/documents_research/CommercialTV.pdf which on page 2 reads: "This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as
permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means or process, without the written permission of the publisher."
Rl 07:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: I have a request for exspansion as its important etc.. TV, Radio especially need to be expanded, everything needs a update too hasent been updated for so long. Mike 01:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: made a few major changes to this page today. I've also added some info about ABC and SBS since they are of course government-owned media providers in Australia and are therefore directly relevant to this article - please expand! Cheers, --Amaher (talk) 06:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Major changes
Talk:Philip Berrigan

message: I created a subhead for the Baltimore Four so that the Catonsville Nine entry could link to this subsection. I created a subhead for Berrigan's C9 subsection too. Benedett 21:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc

message: There is what appears to be an inaccuracy in this passage. It says copies of the paperback Good News for Modern Man were handed out, and later bibles were handed out. Good News for Modern Man is a modern translation of the New Testament, rendered in 20th century English, which was popular at the time. 74.57.252.50 22:19, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Baltimore Four 

message: Is there an image of Philip we can find somewhere to use on this article? Kingturtle (talk) 20:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image? 

message: I edited and reverted recent edits to the article for various reasons. The page is about Philip Berrigan and should stay focused on him. Previous recent additions talked extensively about other activists including Mengle, going on off on long tangents. The style of writing for encyclopaedias is not concerned with storytelling or essay writing but conveying referenced facts to readers, in the manner of Britannica. The content should be easy to read, so acronyms, like SSJ, are not used as many readers won't know what they mean. New additions should be cited by reliable references. We don't include editorialising commentary, such as "it was a natural result", or "The two were kindred spirits and critical thinkers. Berrigan offered a well-read brain, Mengel a warm body". These are opinions. The article seemed to be used as a  coatrack for the Baltimore Four and Mengel perhaps because neither have their own article. I would suggest starting new articles on these subjects (with references). I understand the subjects addressed by the article are emotive and many feel passionate about Berrigan's work, but personal commentary is better suited to a personal blog or private website dedicated to the movement. Span (talk) 23:04, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2013 edits

message: As described by abundant reliable secondary sources, Berrigan was Roman Catholic, which also conforms to our categorization system and the consensus established project-wide to use this precise and descriptive term. Wikipedia is founded on the usage of reliable sources:  Elizium23 (talk) 23:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman Catholic
Talk:Lyla (song)

message: There is no mention of the video for this on the page.  I'll add it later if no one else does first, but does anyone know who was the lead actress in it? --Apyule 08:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video 
Talk:John Godber

message: there should be more info on the play Teechers as i cant find any info on the internet
I've started a page. feel free to add anything you know. Ha, I don't even have the whole script! Don't forget to sign your messages using four tiles (~) Larklight 16:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Category talk:Badminton players at the 2004 Summer Olympics

message: Maybe I'm stupid, but do we need to have an article on every badminton player in the Olympics? When greats like Yang Yang and Zhao Jianhua aren't represented, should we have articles on every paltry badminton player in the world?Mandel 09:42, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
:Olympic athletes are encyclopedic.  If you think we're missing specific articles, please be bold and write them! -- Jonel | Speak 15:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George Washington Goethals

message: Yeah, I frequent this but not everyone knows about Mr. Webb and his Unit Guides, Geesh. So I'm going to delete that edit - its still considered vandalism <most people can ignore what I'm saying> Nerion 00:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop Graffiti Please 

message: It is currently given as gō-thülz.
Is that a German ü? That is unlikely. Is this supposed to be a ə (schwa)?
Varlaam (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Mystik Spiral

message: Weren't they called "Mystik spiral"? At least that's the way I remember it.
:Trent: Maybe if we spelled Myystik with two y's?
:Daria (thinking): Yes, and I'll spell my name Darya and be crowned Miss Universe.
 — JIP | Talk 09:52, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Should the list include Psychic Refugee (started by Trent in 3x08 Lane Miserables)?  The list includes Betrayal, which he was fiddling with in Is It Fall Yet, but including songs not known to be finished could expand the list needlessly...  Wyvern 06:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Songs
Talk:4th Grade (South Park)

message: This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:58, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a reason why people keep redirecting this page to the season 4 article? I saw "unsourced plot recap" but many other episode articles have an unsourced plot recap yet they're allowed to stay up. Gopher47 (talk) 14:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting the page
Talk:List of medieval land terms

message: This article/glossary has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Might it be appropriate to order the list entries according to their size or hierarchical relationship among each other?
Maybe something like the largest subdivisions could be listed first followed by its subdivisions in turn, or the opposite (smalled first followed the the larger entities)?  The entries that are similar or nearly equivalent can be grouped together within the over-all hierarchy.  Might this be a reasonable arrangement? -RobertBlacknut 23:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.. alphabetical if nearly equivalent. Ohwell32 04:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: order of list entries

message: This article presents historical information sans references. This is contrary to current wikipedia standards. For those of us who wish to consult the original sources, please add same. Dlw20070716 (talk) 00:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References, please 

message: The article seems to restrict itself to land ownership in Great Britain. Should the title be changed to match the scope, or the article expanded to cover European feudalism in general? A few of these terms have counterparts in continental Europe, and it seems other applicable terms may have been left out because they weren't particular to Britain. Daß Wölf 22:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  British or general list?
Talk:Same-sex attraction

message: Started article Same Sex Attraction but did not realize there already was this file location b4 someone else told me. pasted article content into here (which included content from myself and another editor) with a redirect from the earlier location (which it was at for a whole of like 1-2 hours...) -- User0529 (talk) 07:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved article

message: The article reads, 'The term differs from sexual orientation labels in that it refers to the attraction itself and not necessarily to a fixed sexual identity or orientation.' I don't think it's true that the term homosexual necessarily refers to a fixed sexual identity or orientation, so this seems very misleading. A neutrality disputed tag might be necessary here. Also, the 'Homosexuality and Christianity' category seems wrong - the article doesn't even mention Christianity. Skoojal (talk) 10:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate? 

message: I don't know how to set up a redirect but one is needed to redirect "Same Sex Attraction" to Same-sex attraction. Thank you  - Markworthen (talk) 18:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: done.  -- Banjeboi 02:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect Needed
Talk:Spider-Man Cartoon Maker

message: I believe this came free with several Packard Bell PC's in England during the late 90's.  I've never actually seen a boxed copy of this anywhere.  I do have fond memories of blowing up Aunt May in my cartoons, ah.  Also notabl e is the existance of the Batman Cartoon Maker. - Jontce 10:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a boxed version, I had it for my computer when I was a little kid (loved it!) I believe Sierra Online owned Knowledge Adventure and they sold the boxes through their magazine InterAction  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.107.152.253 (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 
Talk:David Dixon (actor)

message: There's a great David Dixon fanpage at http://www.rabid.oneuk.com/daviddixon does anyone know what David is up to nowadays, or how old he is?
84.177.100.232 (talk) 22:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leontius

message: Why he is called Leontinus II? Who was Leontinus I?--Panairjdde 11:07, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The first one was an usurper in 484...since there are so many usurpers and co-emperors, Byzantine numbering is kind of strange sometimes. But this can probably safely be moved to Leontius, or "Leontius (emperor)" since there seem to be other people with that name. Adam Bishop 15:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: (Moved from article to discussion page --Abou 06:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled