lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2006 Atlantic hurricane season/Beryl

message: Finally! I guess they decided to designate the southern portion of the disturbance as an invest, not the northern part. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 13:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, wrf and nogaps still develop it. wrf predicts a storm in 42 hrs, and nogaps a little later. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:20, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah looks good for development now. Shear isn't very high and the sea is warm. COME ON BERYL!! ;) -- WmE 14:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This was long overdue; it should have been an Invest 24-36 hours ago. I'd give it a 60% chance of development - conditions change quite quickly in the subtropics. CrazyC83 15:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: And how are you so sure that it has a warm core? The water temps are only borderline up there. People like Jeff Masters have noted that it is possibly subtropical, but he knows he can't be 100.0% sure. —BazookaJoe 19:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I know all. -Winter123 21:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed it too and I nearly had a heart attack when I saw it. But 60° temps? Vince even formed in like, what, 68°, 70°? Too cold. It might, might be noticed by the NHC in post analysis. As for the Invest, I predict a burst of convection in its future. We could have TD two by atleast tomorrow, IMO. →Cyclone1→ 22:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text:  (EDIT: Ahem, I would like to point out to all reading this that this is one of the most correct prediction I've ever posted. I rock. →Cyclone1→ 23:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I read that water temperatures were in the upper 70s, not the lower 60s. And I'll bet the reason the NHC never named it is because if it was indeed a subtropical storm that it only barely made it and that it's not going to be for too long, and it's moving well away from any land areas, not because a cyclone has rarely formed that far north in July. bob rulz 00:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But that's rediculous too. Just because a storm isn't going to affect anybody doesn't mean it doesn't exist. They clearly did not want this to exist, and that's why they used the "it's part of a front so it's extratopical" scapegoat. And besides, this looks like it will scrape Newfoundland. -Winter123 03:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm sure that's not their intention - if made things not exist that they didn't want to exist, I'm sure they wouldn't have announced the unnamed subtropical storm last year. —AySz88\^-^ 03:55, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But it DOES exist!! *runs away crying like a little girl, arms flailing* -Winter123 05:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

text: This thing already looks better organized than that tropical depression in the West Pacific. bob rulz 14:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: TCFA issued!  -- WmE 14:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only that, but TCFAs now seem to have model plots superimposed on them. Cool! --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 14:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 97L.INVEST
Talk:Düsseldorf Hauptbahnhof

message: The S-Bahn S7 is missing. The S-Bahn Line starts in Solingen Hbf and goes via Hilden and Düsseldorf Hbf to Düsseldorf Flughafen Terminal A/B/C  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.143.5.234 (talk) 19:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: S-Bahn S7

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kaiserslautern Central Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Bahnfrend (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Undertakers sketch

message: Hello! Sometimes, I wish I could turn back time and alter the course of certain things. This is one of them. Chapman and Cleese wrote the sketch and the BBC would let the sketch happen if the audience compained during it and booed and complained to the performing Pythons (Cleese, Chapman, and Idle) when the punchline was written. Unlike the poorly executed version, the Pythons would somehow practice when the audience would boo and attack. The audience would be quiet in embarrassment and finally start booing on the line "Fred, I think we've got an eater!" (said by Chapman), and I should note that the audience shouldn't boo very loudly so that we can still hear everyone that needs to be heard. Then, when Chapman says the punchline (after Cleese questions whether he wants to eat his mother or not, Chapman replies, "Look, tell ya what, we'll eat 'er; if you feel a bit guilty afterwards, we can dig a grave and you can throw up in it."), a limited number of the audience, due to fire regulations, attacks Chapman, Idle, and Cleese while those sitting (and even the crew!) encourage them protesting as well. However, alas, I can't change the events of time. That's that.
Also, when the audience attacks, a woman hits Chapman on the head with a towel or something.--68.37.116.234 16:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Údarás na Gaeltachta

message: Can anyone give a citation for "The Irish Language Regional Authority" - my Irish is not great but "Údarás na Gaeltachta" does not mean the aforementioned. If anyhing it means the "Gaeltacht Authority" or something similar. But in any case wikipedia should make it clear, the difference, between meaning and official translation. Djegan 16:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Frank Coe (government official)

message: article says he moved 'permanently to China'.  Did he become a Chinese citizen?  When?  Thanks Hmains 16:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of films based on British sitcoms

message: One of the pages that was referenced defines it as: "a genre of comedy performance in which recurring characters take part in humorous story lines centred on a common environment, such as a family home or workplace."  There is basically one recurring character (not characters) and no common environment.  It also says "The definition of a sitcom leaves quite a lot to open to individual interpretation... We've had to use our own judgement in some cases to decide whether a programme which displays only some of the attributes of a sitcom should appear on this website or not. In most cases we've given the programme the benefit of the doubt."  Which means its use as a reference is dodgy as best.
Wikipedia says "Sitcoms usually consist of recurring characters in a common environment such as a home or workplace, and usually include laughtrack." OK, it has a laugh track, but that's hardly a defining feature.  "has a storyline plot and is more or less comedic drama" for the most part Mr Bean doesn't.  The later ones had a little more storyline (which is when I stopped enjoying them) and I'm sure the movies do (But I've avoided them).  The early ones especially, don't have a storyline, but are rather a series of sketches. "The essence of the current, modern situation comedy on television is that the characters remain in the same situation from episode to episode." Nope. "The term was adopted to distinguish the sitcom from other comedy formats: sketch comedy, which generally featured new characters and situations each outing, or the humorous monologue or dialogue, which did not feature characters."  Although Bean himself does reoccur in the sketches, that's pretty common these days.  That he is the only character is a little out of the ordinary, but hardly prohibitive.  Anyway, it's one element missing from it being a sketch comedy, whereas many are missing from it being a sitcom.
Marketing Dictionary: sitcom  "television program focusing on the humorous side of real-life situations. Sitcoms are often centered on a family or pseudo-family situation. ... Typically, the sitcom is a 30-minute program, where the situation is presented in the first 10 minutes, developed in the next 10 minutes, and then resolved in the last 10 minutes."  Once again, Bean doesn't fit.
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: situation comedy (above link) "television comedy series that involves a continuing cast of characters in a succession of episodes. Often the characters are markedly different types thrown together by circumstance and occupying a shared environment such as an apartment building or workplace. Typically half an hour in length ... they are marked by verbal sparring and rapidly resolved conflicts."  No continuing cast (except Bean, basically), no shared environment, no verbal sparing or conflict resolution.
Even the Mr Bean article on Wikipedia classifies it as "physical comedy/sketch comedy" not "situation comedy"
Why, exactly is Mr Bean called a Sitcom here?
Duggy 1138 (talk) 04:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Bean, Sitcom?
Talk:Unused New York City Subway service labels

message: Please do not use labels such as "fact" and "weasel" without specific reference to WHAT you think is factish or weasley and how it may be resolved. It's easy to place labels but a lot more work to place accurate information. In the case of the speculation about Culver="P" the article explicitely says this is a speculation. I will remove the "Y" reference for 2nd Avenue because it is both unsourced and obviously hasn't happened, since the MTA has officially designated the 2nd Avenue service as "T". -- Cecropia 16:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unwarranted label placements

message: Soon, 8,9,10,11,12 And 13 Trains Will Be Used For Rush Hour 24.47.16.249 (talk) 14:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Division 

message: I found that list confusing, because the sources listed are placed not after the existence of the bullet, but after the (I think) inference that we can guess at the intended route for those bullets. That's the information I thought the source was being used for when I removed the sources - I suggest we either move the sources back to be next to the thing they are referring to, and explain explicitly why there's an assumption about what trunk lines they're intended for - which is an assumption I've seen in a lot of pages with no solid references to really back up the multiple interpretations on varying articles. Thoughts? Tduk (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of sources for the two-digit bullets
Talk:Petra (comics)

message: Marvel's Terra. Same physical appearance and powers. (JoeLoeb (talk) 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terra 

message: Do we have any source that Petra Laskov/Insect Queen/Red Wasp is supposed to be the same person as the X-Men character? The only thing they have in common is the name Petra. IchiGhost (talk) 12:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultimate Marvel
Talk:Fedir Bohatyrchuk

message: Searching the Web, I have apparently found two separate books by Voronkov about Bohatyrchuk:
* A two-volume collection of his games, published in Moscow in 2013.  The English translation of the title is something like "Fedor Bogatyrchuk, Doctor Zhivago of Soviet Chess".  It may have a foreword by Boris Spassky (if I may judge from the quotation given by one of the bookseller websites).
* A reprint of Bohatyrchuk's 1978 autobiographical work, published in Prague in 2017.  This may have additional archival materials gathered by Voronkov, but it does not include any games.
I have not laid my hands on either of these works, so I cannot be absolutely sure that my above descriptions of them are correct.  I would be grateful if someone could confirm or correct what I have guessed.  Bruce leverett (talk) 10:35, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:William McGonagle

message: has there ever been a case where a medal of honor was not presented to the recipient by the president of the united states? sounds odd to me that this captain was given such an honor and the president wasnt the one who presented it. where was president johnson that day? does anyone know?  Keltik31 02:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because  on 12 Oct 2014 (by 70.194.199.98) added the erroneous information, but  (thanks!) corrected it. 99.170.117.163 (talk) 23:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: medal given in a naval yard?

message: November 1998: Captain McGonagle breaks his long silence: “After many years I finally believe that the attack was deliberate. I don’t think there has been an adequate investigation of the incident . . . The flag was flying prior to the attack...” McGonagle will die four months later, on March 3, 1999  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.207.61.35 (talk) 20:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deliberate Israel attack
Talk:Ryder

message: This article sounds like it was written by Ryder.  Can someone please make it a little less POV? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.192.3.47 (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've more or less completely rewritten the article. Hopefully it's better now. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 03:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: The article says that James Ryder retired in 1978. That's incorrect. He sold his share of the company and started JARtran (James A Ryder Transportation), which did not succeed. The reference to the retirement is from the company, and perhaps from their perspective he retired, but that's not what the word retired means. I'm not going to edit the article since I don't want to track down sources, but either the article should be updated to include this, or perhaps changed to say "retired from the company."
Here's an article that covers part of it: https://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/14/business/jartran-is-confident-but-it-faces-hurdles.html
 Hagrinas (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't seem that there ever was such an article, unless it was by a different name than either "James A. Ryder" or "James Ryder". —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:15, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  James A. Ryder 

message: I tagged this article with  after mostly rewriting it. There was a lot of junk that needed pruning, and in any case, the content was rather small compared to other large businesses. I'm going to try to expand it a bit myself, but this article isn't in my main area of interest; I usually just do infoboxes for companies. Hope someone can help out. I think the article needs all-around expansion, but here are some particular areas:
* Company history: Everything thus far is from the "official history" page. Specifically I think there should be coverage of the post-Oklahoma City bombing and post-1993 World Trade Center bombing era.
* International involvement: Personally, I had no idea that Ryder had business outside of the U.S. I think this is something that should be expanded and elaborated upon.
Maybe there's more, but I can't think of anything at the moment. I'll add whatever comes to mind. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 03:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand
Talk:Seehund

message: Is the reference to a "Type XXVII U-boat" that this was contending with for resources correct?  It seems that this submarine is a type XXVII.  Was the XXIII or XXI the other type?  DulcetTone (talk) 16:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Open main menu
Wikipedia
Search
You have no notifications.
Seehund
Article Talk
Language
Download PDF
Watch
History
Edit
This article is about the World War II era submarine. For the modern minesweeping ROV, see Ensdorf-class minesweeper.
Learn more
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (November 2017)
The Seehund (German: "seal"), also known as Type XXVII, was a midget submarine manufactured by Nazi Germany during World War II. Designed in 1944 and operated by two-man crews, it was used by the Kriegsmarine (German Navy) during the closing months of the war, sinking nine merchant vessels and damaging an additional three, while losing 35 boats, mostly attributed to bad weather. The French Navy used four captured boats after the war until 1953.
Kleinstuboot Seehund.gif
Type XXVII B 5 (Seehund) midget submarine
Class overview
Builders
Germaniawerft, Kiel
Operators
 Kriegsmarine
 French Navy
Built
1944–1945
In commission
1944–1953
Planned
1,000
Completed
285
Active
138
Lost
35
General characteristics
Type
Midget submarine
Displacement
17 long tons (17 t) submerged
Length
12 m (39 ft 4 in)
Beam
1.5 m (4 ft 11 in)
Propulsion
1 × 60 bhp (45 kW) Büssing diesel engine
25 bhp (19 kW) AEG electric motor
Speed
7 knots (13 km/h; 8.1 mph) surfaced
3 knots (5.6 km/h; 3.5 mph) submerged
Range
270 nmi (500 km; 310 mi) at 7 knots (13 km/h; 8.1 mph) surfaced
63 nmi (117 km; 72 mi) at 4 knots (7.4 km/h; 4.6 mph) submerged
Complement
2
Armament
2 × G7e torpedoes
History
Production
Operational service
Survivors
References
Further reading
External links
Last edited 3 months ago by 2A02:908:1341:8A00:3520:51D4:191F:2D77
Wikipedia
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
Privacy policy Terms of UseDesktop Faleskimo1996 (talk) 16:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scaling through the thick 

message: The Seehund (German: "seal"), also known as Type XXVII, was a midget submarine manufactured by Nazi Germany during World War II. Designed in 1944 and operated by two-man crews, it was used by the Kriegsmarine (German Navy) during the closing months of the war, sinking nine merchant vessels and damaging an additional three, while losing 35 boats, mostly attributed to bad weather. The French Navy used four captured boats after the war until 1953.
Kleinstuboot Seehund.gif
Type XXVII B 5 (Seehund) midget submarine
Class overview
Builders
Germaniawerft, Kiel
Operators
 Kriegsmarine
 French Navy
Built
1944–1945
In commission
1944–1953
Planned
1,000
Completed
285
Active
138
Lost
35 Faleskimo1996 (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My story
Talk:Teo LT

message: I think it should not be redirected to Telia-Sonera website because it is listed in Vilnius and London stock exchange as separate company Encyclopaedia Editing Dude 17:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:IMAGE (spacecraft)

message: Strictly speaking, IMAGE hasn't been recovered (yet), and that's what the infobox says. They've reacquired the signal, but it isn't really recovered until it's back up and running. Unfortunately, that not something I know how to change in an infobox. Fcrary (talk) 00:53, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's late here, but I'll look into adding a "Reacquired" param to the template tomorrow. There's no other good way to go about it, and I think this situation is worth it to add. I'll have to look into it, but perhaps the International Cometary Explorer could also benefit. I'm thinking on how best to implement. — Huntster (t @ c) 07:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recovery versus reacquisition
Talk:Owyhee

message: See List of Chinook Jargon placenames.  Owyhee is the CJ word for Hawaii, just as Kanaka is for Hawaiians; but I didn't add the Owyhee placenames because they're already here; I just think this is more of a "List" page than a disambig.Skookum1 07:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still don't think this should be a disambig; there's a need to discuss the term which lies outside the usual content of a regular disambig page.  I added a bit, and would have also added something about how "h" was often used to represent glottal-stops, as also in tyhee, a variation on the usual tyee in Chinook Jargon - "Owyhee" is actually a pretty close representation of how Hawai'i is properly pronounced if that is taken into account.  Again, this was the old standard-spelling of Hawaii; up to what date I don't know but I know it was current in BC historical sources into the 1880s...Skookum1 (talk) 17:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This should be a "List of..." page, not a disambig
Talk:Wisconsin Highway 31

message: Highway 31 is now mostly multi-lane highway from Four Mile Road in Racine to the state line. I know this for a fact because I've driven the length of WIS 31 many times. The section from WIS 11 to WIS 142 was rebuilt as a divided highway within the last decade; the section from WIS 50 to the state line was rebuilt in the 1990's, if memory serves. 
The section from Four Mile to Six Mile that's under construction now is likely going to be widened like the section from WIS 38 to Four Mile was in the 1990's - multiple lanes with a "turning lane" in the middle. --jwhouk 11:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Highway 31 Construction
Talk:1972 NHL expansion draft

message: Should we have an article 1972 NHL expansion, or is this sufficient? Most major sports league expansions have their own articles. Holy (talk) 18:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for the expansion itself?
Talk:Wisconsin Highway 23

message: I see Highway 23 listed as east-west from Reedsburg to Wisconsin Dells, yet when I look at Google Street View, I see signs listing Highway 23 as north to south at least as far north as Lake Delton, as of November 2016. I also see signs east of Reedsburg listed as north to south as well, as of August 2013. The Wisconsin Department of Transportation has no information on their website confirming the route listing, and I am unsure who to contact. I don't have any reputable sources other than Google Maps, but I believe this is an issue that needs to be worked out. Does anyone have any information on this?
 Stan  3  03:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of how the route is signed and where it switches from north/south to east/west, it won't change the structure of this article.  We write articles from south to north or west to east, both of which would match the path of this highway. –Fredddie™ 23:47, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  East to west or north to south?
Talk:Wisconsin Highway 20

message: I kept this at start-class because it seems a bit short, there are some formatting errors (such as missing periods), and the main history source is not a reliable source. --NE2 09:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For history sources, there's a 1918 map at , which can be compared against a low-quality scan of a 1918 map at ; it appears that the original route was through Cuba City to near Dickeyville, then south to the Illinois state line. A 1925 (?) list, transcribed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Wisconsin Highways/Early highway history, says East Dubuque. --NE2 10:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

text: The change to WIS 11 was in 1934, and was made in part because of US 20:  I'm unable to pin down the extension to La Grange. --NE2 10:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment comments