lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Great hall

message: What does this term mean?  Where are the screens and what made of, etc.  
4.131.74.6 (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Screens passage"?

message: The beginning paragraph isnt very england centric, implying there are great halls all over europe:ie in france, spain and HRE. However the rest of the article only talks about english great halls. Another thing is differentiating Mead Hall and Great hall. The mead halls were called Great Halls of the king by the vikings themselves, and of course a lot of english descend from vikings, at least in part. So why is there no mention of the viking great halls, and maybe even the influence of those great halls over english great halls inside castles? Maybe the Mead Hall and Great hall articles should even merge. 174.93.159.227 (talk) 02:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very england centric.
Talk:Guédelon Castle

message: "The project can be seen as a major memorial site." Really - a memorial to whom, or what?! Gymnophoria (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to a grinding halt on that phrase too, wondering what was being memorialized. I was puzzled by the "Roman" in "Roman fortification" too - surely "fortification" is adequate.  JohnHarris (talk) 01:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Suspect lost in (Google) translation from the original French article? But it does not appear in that article now, so suggest it's removed. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memoral? 

message: Why is there a section describing ethnographic research? This would seem to be unnecessary. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 15:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If the castle is being built with middle ages techniques, this is part of the research to do so.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intent section 

message: It is not clear if and when construction would be "completed" and/or if there are plans to continue to develop the trades and skills beyond the construction of the castle.  What are the long term plans post construction?
Enquire (talk) 03:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage of construction and expected completion
Talk:Highland Towers collapse

message: Pages at the link given in references 1, 3, and 4 contain only this message:
Maaf, tiada bahan untuk kategori dan tarikh yang anda minta. (no story)
--Zahzuhzaz (talk) 20:06, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links failed verification 

message: I came looking for facts on the collapse, and found an artricle that is largely incoherent, unreferenced, over-detailed, and even obscured by non-English words. Since the article seems to be in active development, I've marked up the problem areas where I could. But some areas are gibberish, yet I couldn't find a template to mark such areas:
- Monsoon season in Malaysia, namely in November and December brought heavy rain and extreme every year can cause flooding, flash floods and landslides. Block 1 Highland Towers collapsed after the rain Download the 10 consecutive days caused landslide after retaining walls where that parking condominium collapsed. 
- The owner of vacant lot behind the Highland Towers condominium, Arab-Malaysian Finance Bhd (AMFB), while the drainage system does not hold because it is waiting for the master system will be constructed for the entire area.
''
- The Cabinet Committee agreed to the rescue proposed to rescue the life victims is stopped.
In general, if I didn't markup unreferenced text, it was because I couldn't even figure out what was being claimed. I hope this article can be salvaged, and that a more informative article will result from this effort.
--Zahzuhzaz (talk) 22:42, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made several changes to some of the sentences. I guess this article was translated into English. Made several grammar corrections as well. --Shorty23sin (talk) 15:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Article more readable now. But the cleanup came with a cost: all footnotes are now gone, making the article difficult to verify. I've tagged any potentially contentious claims that I found. Moreover, the source of claims regarding the legacy of the collapse needs to be revealed. The two listed references don't appear to be likely sources for the legacy claims, although I didn't read them so I could be wrong. --Zahzuhzaz (talk) 18:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs substantial rewrite, or needs to be deleted
Talk:Huntington Park (Columbus, Ohio)

message: What on earth is a minor league stadium doing with 30,000 seats?  That's not far off from a few big-league parks...  Are the folks in Columbus thinking something grand? (they had better not be...)  --Xyzzyva 01:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The figure has since been changed to 10,000, which is a bit low, in my opinion.  ArcAngel (talk) 15:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seating capacity 
Talk:National Liberation Army (Colombia)

message: I've noticed that a number of international organizations, especially Human Rights Watch, refer to the ELN as the "Unión Camilista."  However, the ELN's webpage seems to never refer to themselves like that.  Can anyone explain?  --Descendall 03:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Camilista Union
File talk:Vietnam Expand1.gif

message: The map shows these far northwestern provinces in gray. Is is an oversight?Writtenright 07:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: When did Lai Chau and Dien Bien provinces become part of Vietnam?

message: Indeed, this map cannot be trusted as it is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.252.65 (talk) 13:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SEE COMMENTS-DISCUSSION ON FRENCH VERSION 

message: What an anachronistic, joke of a map. 222.255.193.226 (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Who drew this map has no knowledge whatsoever of Vietnam history
Talk:Chili Bouchier

message: ----
Still active in 1968.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.122.236 (talk) 14:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - I don't think "years active" should have an end date of 1960. That was just in cinema. I think she was in Follies in Manchester circa 1989. Maybe her book will tell us more. TrottieTrue (talk) 18:16, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Cayan Tower

message: This page doesn't mention the date of the flooding. can someone add it please? Letstalk 13:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. It was Feb 7 2007. 143.252.80.100 13:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It has come to my attention that editors are removing undoing potentially valid edits of other editors on this page without providing justification. The rules of Wikipedia clearly state you must provide justification for such actions either in the edit summary and/or the talk page. I am providing a space here for editors to discuss issues they have vs starting an edit war. Be well Kayz911 (talk) 20:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverts on potentially valid edits 
Category talk:Invalid conservation status

message: Please forgive me if I'm missing something here, but it seems to me that a category called Lower Risk (LR) is listed in section IV of the IUCN's 1994 Categories & Criteria, version 2.3. Category LR may no longer be valid according to v3.1 of this document, and new assessments may no longer use LR, but that doesn't mean it's invalid. LR still applies to some species, such as Vipera raddei, which were assessed earlier using v2.3. So, why does this Wikipedia category exist? --Jwinius 03:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the slow reply. Yes, we still use 2.3 categories BUT in the case of LR, all LR categorised taxa also have a subcategory that should go along with it, e.g. LR/nt, LR/lc or LR/cd. So for Vipera raddei it should be LR/lc. —Pengo  talk · contribs 23:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a valid IUCN category?
Talk:Lumiere (skyscraper)

message: I believe this article should be rename "Lumiere" rather than "La Lumiere". As the entry and the official website make clear, "La Lumiere" is just the wrong name, and I think stems from misunderstandings of early press releases on some messageboards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carpsio (talk • contribs) 15:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong name for this project? 

message: Wasn't quite what I expected when typing in a search for Lumiere... What I was looking for was the article about Auguste and Louis Lumière. I just couldn't figure out the funny è. Maybe a pointer page would be in order? –KEBman 21:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lumere and Lumière 
Talk:Springs Preserve

message: Does anyone know how this thing is being funded? Is it just being paid for by the Water District, or what? --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 02:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funding 

message: I'm likely going to split the springs out into a separate article.  I believe that this was the case in the past.  The springs are notable on their own and deserving of an article.  The springs importance fits into several other articles. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, no objections so I'll do the split. Vegaswikian (talk) 04:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split out the springs
Talk:IBM WebSphere Information Integration

message: I don't know how to emphasize the importance of the subject without sounding like an IBM marketing campaign.  The Information Server described on the page creates a new category of business software: the all in one data integration server.  Like the database server or the application server it is an important milestone and other software vendors may start building their own version.  This is opinion and not fact (though widely reported in the press) so I am putting it in the discussion page and not on the wiki entry.
- regards Vincent
* Well, perhaps the point is that the only thing to be reported about this product is an IBM marketing campaign? I think one would need very strong evidence, in particular independent coverage in multiple sources, to show that this product is notable independent of the IBM WebSphere family which we already cover. (Currently only one of the sources is really independent.) Then, of course, content from these sources should be used to expand the article beyond a mere listing of features which it is right now. If there's nothing of note to report about this product, except for a feature listing and an assertion that it "defines a new category of software", it might be best to merge or redirect the article to IBM WebSphere. Actually, if this is really a new category of software, that exists independent of IBM Marketing and is recognized by others, why not write an article about this software category rather than about the individual product? I am replacing the "importance" tag with "notability" for now. --B. Wolterding 11:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Before restoring the article, please read Wikipedia:Burden:
I challenge this entire article because it has no inline citations. Either add them or do not revert the redirect. If you need time to work on the article, feel free to either improve the parent article and then split out or work on it off of the main article space. Thank you. --Explodicle (T/C) 15:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burden of evidence
Talk:Lean-to

message: I don't understand this:
: This form of lean-to is generally provisional; it is an appendix to an existing building constructed to fulfill a new need. 
An appendix for a new need would not necessarily be temporary; the example pictured does not look temporary. Ccrrccrr (talk) 12:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The source is in French so likely it is a bad translation. Kortoso  (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  provision vs. new need
Talk:A. E. Doyle

message: Can anyone confirm Doyle as architect for Timberline Lodge? Timberline was built about 10 years after his death and the signs in the building say nothing about him. Also I'm having trouble finding anything about Doyle and Timberline Lodge online. Pdxstreetcar 02:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like he was hired to design a lodge after his successful Multnomah Falls Lodge, but his plans were never executed.   Many sources still credit him for the current design (I hope they didn't copy that from here). It was designed by four Forest Service architects.   I'll rewrite it. Katr67 03:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Timberline?

message: An anon added this building to the list but I can't find any evidence it's a Doyle. This site has some great info on the Creamery, but nothing on the architecture, though the images have a Doyle look about them. Is this building still standing? Does it go by a different name? Katr67 (talk) 22:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a ref a while back. It's known today as the Leftbank Project. Katr67 (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazelwood Creamery? 
Talk:Hurricane Michael (2000)

message: Nice job on this one. All refs should be cite web formatting. Any other info on the storm should be added. For example, how many hurricanes have hit Newfoundland in October? Probably very few, that could be worth mentioning (after some research to find out how many there were. Maybe Michael's the only one). Is there a pic of the storm at peak intensity, or near landfall? I was planning on doing an article for this storm, and did a bit of research. Here's some links that could help, but possibly not.
* http://www.novaweather.net/Hurricane_Michael_files/Michael_MSC.pdf - More Canada effects
* http://www.usatoday.com/weather/huricane/2000/atlantic/wmichael.htm - News story
* http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/media/top10/2000_e.html#8 - More stuff
Hurricanehink (talk) 04:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to long ago, I found another picture of Michael, it seems that it is at peak intensity, if you compare it to the track map. Apparently it was on Commons since December `05. --12george1 (talk) 18:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Just as a note I am going to switch it to metric unit first then American unit (x km/h (x mph), because this is almost entirely a Canadian hurricane.--12george1 (talk) 19:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Is this really public domain? The NHC didn't make this, they only got it from Environment Canada. Unless, is there something I'm missing? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  17:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image? 
Talk:List of buildings in Milan

message: I think this page is pointless, and since there is the page w:Category:Buildings and structures in Milan I propose a redirect to that page.--Ita140188 (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: and there is also Villas and palaces in Milan -- 82.52.155.112 (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary page
Talk:List of castles and fortresses in Switzerland

message: On this list, the canton is listed as Grisons instead of Graubunden.  Since most of the other articles on the canton use the name Graubunden, if no one objects I'll change it in a few days. Tobyc75 (talk) 22:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grisons or Graubunden
Talk:List of castles in Poland

message: This list has been removed from List of castles and needs to be merged in to this page:
----
* Antonin
* Bardo
* Białystok
* Bierzgłowski
* Boyen Fortress
* Brodnica
* Brody
* Bytów
* Bydlin
* Chęciny
* Chudów
* Cisy
* Chojnów
* Ciechanów
* Czorsztyn
* Darłowo
* Dobrzyca 
* Dożów
* Dybów, Toruń
* Golub-Dobrzyń
* Giżycko
* Gołuchów
* Grodztwo, Kamienna Góra
* Grodno
* Głogów
* Homole
* Jazdów
* Karpień
* Karpniki
* Kazimierz Dolny
* Kliczków
* Koło
* Konarzewo
* Korzkwa
* Koszęcin
* Kórnik
* Koszęcin
* Krobielowice 
* Krzyztopór, Ujazd
* Książ
* Kwidzyn
* Legnica
* Lewków
* Lidzbark Warmiński
* Lipowiec
* Lubostronie
* Łapalice
* Łańcut
* Łęczyca
* Izrael Poznański Castle in Łódź
* Karol Poznański Castle in Łódź
* Maurycy Poznański Castle in Łódź
* Goldfeder Castle in Łódź
* Steinertów Castle in Łódź
* Międzyrzecki
* Moszna
* Nowy Dwór
* Nowotaniec
* Nowy Sącz]
* Olsztyn Warminski
* Olsztyn Małopolski
* Osieczna
* Oświęcim
* Poznań Royal Castle
* Poznań Emperor Castle
* Działyński Castle in Poznań
* Górków Castle in Poznań
* Mielżyński Castle in Poznań
* Przedecz
* Pszczyna
* Płonin
* Radomierzyce
* Radosno
* Rogowiec
* Ryn
* Siemianowicki
* Sieniawa
* Stara Kiszewa
* Słupsk
* Śmiełowie 
* Świerklaniec
* Wąsowa
* Kings Castle in Warsaw
* Krasiński Castle in Warsaw 
* Namiestnikowski Castle in Warsaw 
* Wilanów, Warsaw
* Royal Castle Wrocław
* Wenecja near Żnin
* Wleń
* Wojnowice
* Wołek
* Zatonie
* Zimowy
* Złocieniec
* Złotoria
----
--David Edgar 16:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To be added

message: Why aren't there castles? Phamnhatkhanh (talk) 02:56, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: there aren't castles
Talk:Elizaveta Khripounova

message: Hello - can someone help me with this? ScoopPR (talk) 20:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dear User:ScoopPR, I hope you are well. There's nothing personal going on here. You just aren't complying with Wikipedia guidelines. Citations to reliable, authoritative, and neutral third-party sources would support the edits you want to make. They are absolutely essential. Wikipedia requires them. Blogs, gossip columns, etc simply won't suffice. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE and HERE. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 04:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: What is the year of her birth?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:445:500:2610:58A7:422B:DA7A:EFE4 (talk) 06:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How old is she?
Talk:List of historic houses in England

message: I think that the page should include the house current status examples being if it is demolished, or who it is managed by as most the national trust properties are highlighted already. Also if people are viewing this list they should know if the house is private residence to avoid trespassing cheers JMRH6 (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page content
Talk:Marian High School (Indiana)

message: Suggestions for improving this section of the article are welcome. I have currently provided a single citation to the high school's own news page, but I am working on compiling articles from other sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nanowolf (talk • contribs) 04:44, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a high school in northern Indiana.  There's not going to be much in the way of third-party reliable sources to expand this.  Heck, the citation you added doesn't even belong, since it's not third party, or by any means neutral. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 12:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research 

message: This page was a mess.  It isn't anymore.  If you are going to edit this page, please attempt to learn what does and doesn't belong in a high school article.  John from Idegon (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:SCH/AG|School article guidelines]] 
Talk:Clementine Hunter

message: The article clearly needs references. I actually undid an undo of an anon edit I did; the undo was done by a bot that undid because of a youtube link as a reference. Fair enough, but it doesn't negate the added info, which is no more or less unreferenced than the other material. I'm adding a reference needed tag for now. CouplandForever (talk) 02:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article is now referenced and has photos, albeit only black and white. Marrante (talk) 07:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:List of London venues

message: What theater was this? It was in either London or Paris. The theater still stands, as far as I know, but I forget which it is. It is over 300 years old. Apparently during renovations in the mid-1800s a body was discovered inside a wall. This sound familiar to anybody? --208.65.188.23 (talk) 06:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't the place to ask, but this sounds like the body found in the Theatre Royal that is usually linked to the "Man in Grey" ghost. Le Deluge (talk) 11:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Very old theater, body discovered inside a wall

message: There is no theatre in this so I have deleted it from the list. SmokeyTheCat 10:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: However it is regularly used for open-air theatre - I guess it depends on whether you define a "venue" as having a permanent structure or not. Le Deluge (talk) 11:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brockwell Park 

message: Is there a reason this page is missing the following theatres?
*Brixton House, Main Sapce
*Brixton House, Studio
*Fuse Box
*Greenwich Theatre
*Seven Dials Playhouse
*Southwark Playhouse (Elephant)
*The Bridge House Theatre
*The Cervantes Theatre
*The Golden Goose
*The Hen and Chickens
*The Jack Studio
*The Marylebone Theatre
*The Playground Theatre
*Waterloo East
TomSho1 (talk) 02:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing theatres
Talk:List of tallest structures in Australia

message: Added date for Mount Isa lead smelter stack - 1978.  Reference is  Xstrata assets website <http://www.xstrata.com/assets/pdf/xcuau_mountisamines_brochure_040810> Peter Bell (talk) 01:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. When starting a discussion on any talk page, please use the "new section" or "+" button at the top of the page. Thanks, timsdad  (talk) 01:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIM Smelter Stack 

message: Its own article says it's the second tallest building in Perth but it isn't in this list. Grassynoel (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brookfield Place, Perth
Talk:List of tallest structures in Hungary

message: This list is old and must be updated (see: Emporis.com/Hungary) --Krzysztof 13 (talk) 12:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 
Talk:List of tallest buildings in Atlanta

message: The images featured in this list are missing ALT text that has recently become one of the points of the Featured list criteria. The list therefore fails 5b of the Featured list criteria and should have ALT text added to keep its status.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ALT text missing 

message: I checked the citation for this number and found the link claims there to be 258 high rises. However the real number is much smaller, as this list contains buildings that have been demolished, never built, or simply proposed. Anyone know a more reliable source? Mattximus (talk) 15:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of High Rises 

message: I'm not sure it's appropriate to have a speculative, unsourced "proposed" section. These sections are not very encyclopedic, as many (most?) never end up built, or if they are built, modified from the proposed form. It runs afoul of Wikipedia:CRYSTAL, even if sources are found. This is a list of tallest buildings, not a list of imaginary/potential buildings. Mattximus (talk) 19:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed section 

message: This list is outdated. The current entries should be merged with the main list, and new ones added as needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.31.201.66 (talk) 20:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tallest under construction 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Tallest atlanta. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest atlanta until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 16:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tallest atlanta" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]