lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Winefat

message: This should probably redirect to somewhere else. It is actually that vat that treading takes place in. Justinc 01:37, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It is found in the KJV only at  and . Given WP:NOTDICT, I am redirecting it to History of the wine press#Early history. This is probably a more useful target than the general article wine press, as the term winefat only crops up in a Biblical context, and it illustrates the old methods of ancient & Roman times. See Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary at . – Fayenatic London 20:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:International Cryptology Conference

message: I strongly disagree that this stuff about SHA1 should go in this article. Collisions in SHA1 are notable, sure. But so are most things that get into CRYPTO because it is a good conference. I think it takes more than being "notable" to be included in an article about a conference on all of cryptography. Are CRYPTO and research on SHA1 collisions so intrinsically? When someone mentions the CRYPTO conference, do people think "oh, that place where they publish papers about finding SHA1 collisions?" No. Should we add other notable CRYPTO papers to make it more fair? In my opinion no, because it will only reflect the subjective opinions of whoever makes the list (my list certainly wouldn't contain anything about SHA1). I don't think any highlighting of particular results should appear here (until I present my paper that settles P vs NP!). Blokhead 05:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SHA1 stuff doesn't belong here

message: Sorry, but the enormous table you've added to this article does not belong here. Please see WP:INDISCRIMINATE; Wikipedia articles should explain the subject, mostly in prose, not collect the minutae about the subject. Either this needs to be split into a separate article or removed. -- intgr [talk] 22:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The conferences table does not belong
Talk:Derek Jeter

message: Please change "===Minor leagues (1992–1995)===" to "===Minor leagues===". 2603:8000:8500:38F2:E527:AADE:EF92:B8CA (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2023 

message: Please change "==Minor leagues (1992–1995)==" to "==Minor leagues==". 2603:8000:8500:38F2:C1E5:22A5:9AAC:85A4 (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Not an improvement – Muboshgu (talk) 15:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2023 

message: Under "==Professional career==", please combine "===Draft===" and "===Minor leagues (1992–1995)===" into "===Draft and minor leagues===". 2603:8000:8500:38F2:C1E5:22A5:9AAC:85A4 (talk) 17:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2023 (2) 

message: Have a rookie card of u in high school 206.72.212.91 (talk) 20:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baseball   

message: Please change "Draft" and "Minor leagues" and combine them into "==Draft and minor leagues==". 2603:8000:8500:38F2:90AE:186F:9A89:3E33 (talk) 20:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Jamedeus (talk) 21:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2024
Talk:Backward compatibility

message: The article states that Intel x86 is backwards compatible all the way back to the 8080.  I'm almost certain this is not the case and that the binary backwards compatibility is only back to 8086/8088.  See this Retrocomputing StackExchange article for instance.  I'd fix but at the moment I don't have time to dig up proper references. BrandyLova (talk) 04:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy about x86 & 8080 example 

message: I have some sources discussing the rise of digital storefronts as making backwards compatibility obsolete. I was thinking of re-naming the 'Costs' section 'Drawbacks', both to strike a balance with the 'Benefits' section before it and to introduce some of the broader criticisms of the feature not pertaining to the literal costs. Any input on this would be very welcomed. Zachary Sparacio (talk) 01:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation of Drawbacks category or expansion of Costs 

message: The article claims that forward-compatible products "usually" have a roadmap for this.  But in many cases, including the cited example of FM mono to stereo, the older technology was introduced without the new technology in mind, and forward-compatibility was only added as a requirement when the new technology was developed. KevinBTheobald (talk) 06:47, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roadmap "usually"? 

message: Is it okay to make "backwards compatibility" the primary name of the article? I googled both "backwards compatibility" and "backward compatibility" and the former appears to be more common. --AllOriginalBubs (talk) 16:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how you could possibly make that determination from a Google search. Google, like most search engines, treats words like "backward" and "backwards" as interchangeable in order to maximize the number of search results. Martin IIIa (talk) 20:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Google's ngram viewer shows that, in books at least, "backward compatibility" is far more common than "backwards compatibility". Same for "backward compatible" vs. "backwards compatible". CodeTalker (talk) 20:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backwards vs backward
Talk:Refinitiv league tables

message: What does ABS stand for? Jaberwocky6669 02:22, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
Asset-Backed Securities Ilya 14:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anybody have a set of old lists for M&A and DCM/ECM? From the '90s or even '80s, I would greatly appreciate that.--130.237.89.98 08:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old tables 

message: The links are still pointing to Thomson Reuters.   Can someone update them?   FreeFlow99 (talk) 10:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links are out of date
Talk:Automaticity

message: "In Influence, Robert Cialdini's best-selling book about social psychology and influence tactics, Cialdini explains how......." "Best selling" is irrelevant. Its also written like advertising. I'm not sure if a pop book, without empirical research, ought to be cited at all. 84.13.173.45 (talk) 00:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising, blurb, promotion? 
Talk:Ingredient

message: I don't believe that we need a disambiguation page for ingredient, as (apart from The Main Ingredient) there is only one general sense covered here.  I shifted the links to secret ingredient and active ingredient into a paragraph explaining their use, and put a link to The Main Ingredient at the bottom.  I doubt, however, that many people who are looking for info on TMI will just type "ingredient".
A question:  Is tech-stub the best tag to use?
--Slashme 08:19, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: The FDA labeling link in the References needs to be updated to http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm2006828.htm  Penelope Gordon (talk) 06:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks for the link. Mindmatrix 15:16, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  FDA labeling link update 

message: An ingredient to be defined as a purposeful inclusion. The word definition to be clarified to be exclusive of possible contaminants. "Thus all ingredients are constituents, but not all constituents are ingredients" is too much off a blanket statement, not fully clarifying the important subject of contamination — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Kevo Johnson (talk • contribs) 13:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearly define Ingredients as separate from contaminants
Talk:Kinfolk (World of Darkness)

message: This article is about a fictional world, but that's not clearly indicated anywhere.  The "Werewolf: the Apocalypse" parenthesis will mean nothing to most people.
Do these kind of topics really deserve articles of their own?  Do we need some kind of template for articles about fictional worlds?
Danny Yee 02:35, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fictional
Talk:Saving throw

message: Can we please have a saving throw against this article to see if it survives? - Abscissa 07:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Remember that it gets +1 for brevity Nitwit005 (talk) 16:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Humor

message: Yesterday, the Saving throw page and its complete edit history has been exported from here and imported at RPG Museum (page link), a growing wiki on Fandom that intends to be a resource for all tabletop RPGs. RPG Museum is using this content under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. Thanks, all! -- Supermorff (talk) 09:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exported to RPG Museum
Talk:Amba-Alagi

message: Does anyone have a more specific idea where this place is? I could not find it on this map.  "Between Addis Ababa and Asmara" is extremely vague, and the fact that Dessie lies to the south does not narrow it down very much.  May also need to update this article to include to Eritrea, if part or all of this area lies therein (anyway it does refer to Asmara). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 02:34, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Side chain

message: I have removed the  tag because no Wiktionary definition exists as of now and the article, even if short, is more than a dictionary definition. This article links to several other Wikipedia articles and several other articles link here. Cacycle 08:59, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sidechain is also a term in music, which describes a synth- or bassline having its volume modulated by a kick drum. It can also be achieved by triggering a compressor on the kick drum. 
Source: http://euroadrenaline.com/forum/showthread.php?t=89472
:I created side chain (music) for this term.  --Ed (Edgar181) 21:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation:Side Chain 

message: I have created a disambiguation page at side-chain to differentiate between the topics side chain and substituent, which both apparently use the term side chain (also spelled side-chain). I put a disambiguation notice at the top of the side chain article. It may not be the most elegant disambiguation, and I do not know how to use the disambiguation templates, so you are welcome to modify it, if you would like to do so. In addition, there are terms like pendant group and pendant chain that may require disambiguation. -- Kjkolb (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation of side chain/side-chain 
Talk:Long Reach Ethernet

message: I'm having trouble telling the difference between LRE and xDSL. Based on some of the reading I've done, it sounds to me as if LRE is just a high-speed variant of xDSL. Can someone explain the difference? Is there a difference?
If anything, it seems like a variant of SDSL that instead of using PPPoE, it just uses, well, E (Ethernet). Am I wrong?
cluth 02:38, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
:xDSL is the generic term. This is one variant the used an Ethernet-like packet framing. I am looking to see how it relates to the 10BaseS product that Infineon had - same or similar? W Nowicki (talk) 01:33, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Early question
Talk:Dissolve (filmmaking)

message: Anybody else have a problem with the clause "On the other hand, poorly done hard cuts startle the viewer even more than a dissolve"? This assumes that a hard cut shouldn't startle the viewer when some directors craft a hard cut specifically to startle the viewer. The statement assumes that classical Hollywood editing is the "right" way to edit.
Schmub (talk) 14:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Taken care of. --Adoniscik (talk) 18:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove "poorly done" 

message: The Lap dissolve article does not cite any references, but it still contains the correct elements that are needed to expand the Dissolve article. –Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 00:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Lap Dissolve article to Dissolve (filmmaking) 

message: I'd like to propose the article name be changed to Dissolve (film editing) for reasons of clarification. The process is normally done either optically or digitally, but rarely in-camera (anymore). "Filmmaking" is a broad term that covers the entire field, obviously, but "filmmaking" would also include accounting and script supervising, for example. The dissolve is more specifically attributed to editing and making its point via editing. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 00:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed new article name 

message: How is the dissolve done?  In some old films, it looks like with dissolve(-and-fade) that the one piece of film physically stuck on top of the other? 
(Perhaps alternatively it could be done during making a copy?   Where it would be less obvious/visible in a physical way)
Can it be called cross-fading in film?
77.172.196.228 (talk) 15:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old films / editing 
Talk:Suite (hotel)

message: Do suites have more than one room in them?  For example, if I reserve a hotel suite and go there with an acquaintance, then will each of us have separate room with a bed or not?Patchouli 04:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although at one point the term suite would have implied multiple rooms, it no longer seems to in many hotels.  Also, multiple bedrooms are rare in most hotels.  Adjoining rooms with a door inbetween serve the function that multi-bedroom suites once did.  (RookZERO 02:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rooms in a Suite?
Talk:Tablecloth

message: There is some history behind why we have tablecloths. I heard once they had something to do with the idea that a man might be overcome with desire at the thought of a leg by seeing a table leg, so they needed something to cover them up with. Needs investigating I don't have time for right now though >.<
Liastnir 20:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Gerri Lawlor

message: Here's a recording of Stephen Kearin and Gerri Lawlor riffing together while playing The Sims:
https://donhopkins.com/home/catalog/sounds/Steve_And_Gerri.wav
Xardox (talk) 09:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephen Kearin and Gerri Lawlor riffing together while playing The Sims
Talk:Trigger guard

message: Aren't you meant to hold your finger on the outside of the trigger guard, until you see a target, then put your finger on the trigger?
I am not sure, so I didn't put it in the article, but there you go, correct me if I am incorrect.  86.29.75.105 (talk) 23:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Portuguese wine

message: This page is extremely outdated. Many of the regions listed have changed entirely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:643:200:4C00:81C8:B783:C899:6889 (talk) 08:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Help

message: I'm translating "Generoso" has 'generous' (I dont know the English term). These kind of wines are Madeira Wine and Moscatels... -Pedro 03:05, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generoso 

message: Shouldn't Rosé wines be included as well in this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AxiomShell (talk • contribs) 13:07, 8 December 2006
:Actually, Portugal doesn´t have a genuine tradition in Rosé wines.
:DC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.138.240.16 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 16 June 2007
::That sort of depends if you consider for example Mateus Rose genuine or not... :-) Tomas e (talk) 11:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosé
Talk:Pacific Northwest

message: Both BC Ferries and Washington State Ferries are huge ferry systems (not to mention the Alaska Marine Highway), and while I don't know of any similar system in Oregon I think the fact that the coastal section relies so heavily on ferries merits a mention in the Transit subsection. Spellingbee91 (talk) 16:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point , the Coast Starlight Amtrak route is listed, but not a single ferry route. Some individual WSF routes exceed the Amtrak ridership by at least an order of magnitude: the Bainbridge Island-Seattle for example has millions of riders. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferry usage? 

message: The PNW has a small city, Vancouver WA, directly north of Portland, OR, which is often considered part of the Greater Portland area. Directly north of the northern WA state border is the Greater Vancouver area, which includes Vancouver, British Columbia. In the US part of the PNW, the Canadian Vancouver is typically called Vancouver BC, while the American Vancouver is simply called Vancouver. However, I do not know if this is common convention in Canada. If it is, the Greater Vancouver area may be more appropriately called the Greater Vancouver BC area to avoid ambiguity as to which Vancouver hold geographic significance to the PNW. Thoughts? Professor Whumpus (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Greater Vancouver area more appropriately called the Greater Vancouver BC area? 

message: As someone from outside North America, I was surprised to learn that the Pacific Northwest designation is used for what is actually the Pacific Northeast ( the northeast coast of the Pacific Ocean). I understand the designation makes sense from a local continental USA perspective and I am not saying the intro is not clear. But I think it would be good to point out this contradiction at the beginning of the article to make it more obvious for those to arrive from outside the USA. 69.172.153.217 (talk) 00:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify odd designation?
Talk:William Penn (Royal Navy officer)

message: The article doesn't mention how he died.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.235.19.98 (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause of Death?

message: See Subject
Winn3317 20:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in the First-Anglo Dutch Wars 

message: Based on the text of the article, Penn was never a Royal Navy officer.  He was in the Commonwealth/Protectorate Navy, and he was then an MP.  I assume I can't move the page without an account so haven't done so, but it may be worth doing for the sake of accuracy.86.156.210.168 (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Under Charles II he was not only a member of the Navy Board but, as the article says (misleadingly under "Political career"), in 1665 flag captain to the Duke of York (Lord High Admiral) and later that year commanded a fleet.  So he was actually a Royal Navy officer.  I agree that it is not a good title, but it is not incorrect.--Martin Wyatt (talk) 21:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title 

message: The infobox says he was burried in Ruscombe, but the Personal Life section says, "As a native of the West Country, Sir William Penn is buried in the church of St. Mary Redcliffe in Bristol. Which is it?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 01:25, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Two reputable sources say St Mary Redcliffe.  Martin Wyatt (talk) 11:38, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was he burried?
Talk:Almighty dollar

message: I have recreated this article as part of the WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles. Kaldari 22:40, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What category should it be in? JFW | T@lk 10:27, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recreation

message: I note that this article was previously deleted as being a dictionary def. under WP:WINAD... it still is.  Why was it recreated, and should it be renominated for deletion? Blueboar 21:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It says 4 lines above why the article was recreated. WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles requested it as it was an encyclopedia article in the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica. If you don't think it will ever make a good encyclopedia article feel free to nominate it for deletion. Kaldari 22:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was this recreated? 

message: Cuz my seconds, minutes, hours go to the almighty dollar
And the all mighty power of dat chit cha cha chopper  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.189.70.93 (talk) 11:54, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lil Wayne - A Millie
Talk:Sinology

message: Planning to move "famous recognized sinologists" to new article "List of Sinologists".  Any thoughtsIluvchineselit 03:23, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Sinologists

message: I took the liberty of removing the following sentence from the beginning:
"In China, sinologists are sometimes, with admiration and affection, called "experts on China" (中國通)".
Apart from the characters to me displaying as question marks, which i hope has to do with me not having chinese fonts enabled, the sentence appeared to me not informative, as sinologist and 'expert on china' are nearly synonyms. Jens Nielsen 14:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sinologists as experts on china 

message: Neologism, content fork which would be better here. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 14:31, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merging Superzohar  Talk 08:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: Should people involved in sinology be written with an upper case S or a lower case s? - Tournesol (talk) 09:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was a bit surprised to see it capitalized. Mythirdself (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not capitalized here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_sinology  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mythirdself (talk • contribs) 00:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the sinology people Sinologists or sinologists? 

message: Can't imagine that this one will be too controversial but I'm going to give my reasons just in case. I removed it because it was a transparent attempt at self-promotion by the author of the summarized article. He even went so far as to announce this edit by sending a mass e-mail to a bunch of China scholars, apparently hoping to incite a debate about his points. This isn't the place for such a debate, and I'm sure Mr. Kuijpers won't have any trouble finding a forum for sinologists to engage in a discussion. The argument as presented in the summary is also completely non-notable because it's a silly false dichotomy - either you're an expert on all facets of China, which is indeed impossible, or you don't have any relevant knowledge about the country and its culture. Röstigraben (talk) 17:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kuijper's "criticism" section
Talk:Amniotic fluid embolism

message: Removed an obsolete note that this page had been transwikied to Wiktionary.-- era (Talk | History) 15:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Copied from http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic122.htm
Earlier version appear to be stubs that generated a transwiki to wiktionary, and there does not appear to a reasonable version to revert back to so submitting for copyvio deletion. -- Whpq 19:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be obsolete now; the text has been replaced with a new article, by and large.-- era (Talk | History) 15:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: — Assignment last updated by Doctorbubbles2023 (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor
Talk:Appeal to the majority

message: People support the death penalty for any number of reasons.  Is there a better, more clear cut example we could come up with? --CVaneg 03:31, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Any suggestions for replacements?  "Many people play baseball, there should be a law that every town should build a baseball stadium"? (SEWilco 03:00, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Better Example