Talk:Gipuzkoa

message: If so we don't need both. Rich Farmbrough, 18:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag an coat of arms same? 

message: It exists a manipulation of the real name in English. If Gipuzcoa is official is only in Spain, not in english language as allways has been Guipuscoa, the person that made this change is basque and want to impose this wrong form.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rayfrito (talk • contribs) 02:07, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus spelling is Gipuzkoa (see the debate and its conclusions on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Basque). Akerbeltz (talk) 09:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   In English is Guipuscoa not Gipuzcoa 

message: The article should be renamed (again) to "Guipuscoa", which is the name of the province in English, as the article Biscay (Bizkaia) uses the English name. We cannot have one of the provinces with an English name and the other one with a Basque or Spanish name; there must be some sort of unity. I believe there are some debate about the naming of the Basque articles, but it has been on a "hiatus" for long time. Until it is decided what to do with these artícules, this one should be renamed "Guipuscoa", at least to be in pair with Biscay. Greetings.--Metroxed (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not as clear as you say. Compared to toponyms such as Lisbon or Rome (or even Biscay — remember the Bay of Biscay, quoted profusely in English texts), this is a name with not a very abundant tradition in the English language, and if you look at Saragossa or Corunna, you will see that Gipuzkoa is not a lonely exception when not observing old English names. Anyway, this has been thoroughly discussed and a consensus was already reached (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Basque), so this article should not be moved, unless another consensus is reached. --Xabier Armendaritz(talk) 08:18, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Xabier. We had a good debate and reached a consensus which has been stable. There's no rationale for using the Guipuscoa spelling which is mostly used in French. And not everything has to come in pairs. Biscay is the English form, Álava the Spanish, Gipuzkoa the Basque... it's all a bit mixed anyway and I'm loathe to open this box of worms again. Akerbeltz (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. No change needed then, thanks for your answers.--Metroxed (talk) 20:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome! Thanks for bringing it up on the talk page first! Akerbeltz (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guipuscoa 

message: In the Encyclopedia Britannica is 'Guipúzcoa':
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/248956/Guipuzcoa  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.169.242.190 (talk) 19:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted, see the section above and more importantly the debate where consensus was reached: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Basque#Province_names Akerbeltz (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedia Britannica

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gipuzkoa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130726031049/http://www.gipuzkoaturismo.net/WAS/CORP/DITPortalTurismoPublicoWEB/GenerarPDF.do?idioma=en&codigoFN=E.4.2.2 to http://www.gipuzkoaturismo.net/WAS/CORP/DITPortalTurismoPublicoWEB/GenerarPDF.do?idioma=en&codigoFN=E.4.2.2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified