Talk:Puss / Oh, the Guilt

message: '"Puss/Oh, The Guilt" peaked at number 12 on the UK singles chart, and was deleted one week after being released.'
It was deleted? What the heck does that mean? PolarisSLBM 16:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

message: :Image:NirvanaGuilt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NirvanaGuilt.jpg

message: As the article currently states, the remastered version of "Oh, the Guilt" that is featured on With the Lights Out does not have the lighter noises during the intro.  Additionally, Kurt Cobain's vocal has a slight echo effect added to it that's not present in the original single version and the overall mix has slight reverb added to it, again, not present in the original single version.  The new version is also compressed more heavily than the original single version.  As a result, the original mix from 1993 actually sounds clearer.
Are these details too small to include in the article?  Is the original research rule set in stone? 72.43.141.71 20:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remastered version 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Puss/Oh, the Guilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140504191326/http://www.dbermangallery.com/articles/bucknall-aas.htm to http://www.dbermangallery.com/articles/bucknall-aas.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040615081026/http://members.tripod.com/~jesuslizard/discog.htm to http://members.tripod.com/~jesuslizard/discog.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051123124940/http://livenirvana.com/official/index.html to http://www.livenirvana.com/official/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Candy/Molly's Lips which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 16:45, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: It would be good if we could get the US chart peaks for this release which should be in CMJ magazine from February and March 1993. QuintusPetillius (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: US peaks