lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Amagi

message: The infobox lists Amagi's standard displacement as 22.400 tons, and her full load displacement as 22,800 tons, for a difference of only 400 tons. This seems to me to be an incredibly small difference; the Essex class (of the same time frame), for example, had a difference of over 9,000 tons. WeeWillieWiki (talk) 18:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displacement 

message: The Tully source link was broken due to a capitalization error in the url.  That was fixed and the link now works.  
Question:  As this source was used to verify the claim made on the main page, and the capitalization error was in the link was broken when that was approved, how was the citation checked?  
In any event the link now works, and the  tags have been removed, as the source supports the sentences to which those tags were recently added.  24.177.99.126 (talk) 19:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Did the "flight deck fall[ing] overboard" or did stuff on the flight deck fall overboard? Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My source says that the flight deck itself fell off when she rolled over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falling overboard 

message: No., 
24.177.99.126 (talk) 03:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does every sentence need a cite?
Talk:Jayasri Burman

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:19, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition
Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū

message: QUOTE: "Hiryū (Japanese: 飛龍, meaning "Dragon Flying in Heaven [1]")" Well actually, "飛龍" simply translates to "flying dragon". No heaven. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 10:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I think I already know what kind of response I'm going to get from this, BUT...
There is a Japanese online game-turned-cartoon series called Kantai Collection that reimagines the IJN as a collection of cute girls. It's currently one of the more popular nerd cults in Japan and has done a lot to revive interest in the IJN and its ships. Would it be horrible to mention this in these sorts of articles? Brutannica (talk) 03:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Replying four and a half years later, but yes. Robofish (talk) 18:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: ''KanColle''
Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Hiyō

message: If not for the infobox, this would be a Stub. Expansion needed. LordAmeth 18:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the original aircraft complement from the start of the war. Shibumi2 00:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: I was looking on Combinedfleet.com, and the record for Hiyo there makes no mention of the attack on Meredith. However, the entry for Zuikaku and Shokaku says that those two ships were the ones that launched the airstrike that sank Meredith. Someone want to verify this? —Masterblooregard (talk) 02:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinking the USS Meredith 

message: I was surprised that this article has no mention of the Junyo, her sister ship.  This is particularly surprising given that the Junyo and Hiyo regularly served together.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.184.236.240 (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Read it again. There are at least two mentions in the service section.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister ship Junyo 

message: Edward L. Beach Jr. misidentifies this ship as the Hitaka in Submarine!, and I've seen that name floating around elsewhere. Should that discrepancy be documented in the article? Mackensen (talk) 23:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen it myself. Feel free to address the issue yourself, just be sure to match citation style and English variation.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitaka 

message: This article is rated as A class which means that it's been reviewed by at least 3 people for prose quality, compliance with the MOS, and factual errors. If they'd thought that the current level of detail in the lede was wrong, they'd have mentioned it during the review. So it's not just my stylistic preference.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  detail in the lede
Talk:Jaye Radisich

message: Is she of Serbian origin? Baks (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Croatian  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehaka (talk • contribs) 09:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's odd, as the name is from northwestern Serbia, but yes, she is Croatian. Orderinchaos 11:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Oviedo High School

message: Is this really an F school?  
No, it is a great school!!
Who from Oviedo edits this page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.8.168.38 (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

message: I removed "Mario Cacciatore" from this section because e does not have a Wikipedia page which is required to establish notailty. The information I removed is: Mario Cacciatore - software engineer for EA Sports. Thanks!--BuzyBody (talk) 02:55, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni section 

message: I do not know on what basis this article was assigned a "C", but under the school project standards, this is still a stub.  Close to a start, but still a stub.  There is no history section, the referencing is not the best, there is a lot of verbosity boardering on schoolcruft.  I am re-rating it a stub as of today.John from Idegon (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article quality rating 
Talk:Chain Hang Low

message: This song is a much stronger reference to "Do your ears hang low?" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Your_Ears_Hang_Low%3F 96.41.10.91 (talk) 03:21, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkey in the Straw?!?!?! 

message: *Lucas, Demetria. "Shock & Awe." The Source November 2006: 24-25.
It's an article from The Source magazine, the one with Xzibit or Jim Jones on the cover (there were two covers for that issue). Brad T. Cordeiro 01:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for Minstrel show origins 
Talk:Jayne Meadows

message: The main data form under her photo says she was active till 2009. The article doesn't. When did she stop working? --166.250.1.87 (talk) 08:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no stage work after 2009 listed on her website. There are four movie roles after 2009 listed on her website.  There are five TV roles after 2009 listed on her website. There is further TV work listed on her site. All this work should be added to the article by someone with more time than I have. David Spector (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Years Active problem

message: Her first marriage was from 1948-1954.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her First Marriage 

message: Born Jane Cotter (simply), not Jane Meadows Cotter or Jayne Meadows Cotter as per this link. Quis separabit? 03:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder whether the writer intended that reference to indicate her full name or, possibly, just the name she was known by. Her siblings are listed as "Audrey, 5; and brothers Taylor, 11, and Edward, 9." It would be unusual for none of the four to have a middle name, although that is a possibility. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:54, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth name
Talk:Karl Philipp, Prince of Schwarzenberg

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Support As nominator. Charles 23:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Wishing to preserve his army is a poor excuse for Schwarzenbergs blunders both at Dresden and Leipzig, both of which could have cost him his complete army. At Dresden he was saved by the lucky events at Kulm/Nollendorf, at Leipzig the Tsar had to overrule Schwarzenberg to avert complete disaster in the south.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poliorketes (talk • contribs) 18:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Critics
Talk:Jayne Middlemiss

message: Whilst sitting in for Stephen Merchant on his BBC 6 Music radio show with Alan Carr on Sunday 27th January 2007, Jayne claimed that her birthday was next Sunday, and that the 8th February is five days after her birthday, confirming that her actual date of birth is the 3rd of February. Conrad1on (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 
Talk:Jayo Felony

message: Wasn't this guys name Jay-o or am I confusing to him with another artist? I mean if he is dissing Jay-z i mean i think they had beef over there name or something like that can someone explain this please.
:That's Jaz-O, Jayo dissed Jay-Z over something Jay said. XdiabolicalX 13:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I'm not sure about these rumors. Jayo Felony did a song with The Game (obviously an enemy of G-Unit). I doubt that 50 Cent would want someone associated with Game, and I even more highly doubt that The Game would work with a potential G-Unit member.
The song I'm talking about is "Back 2 Back" feature The Game and Jayo Felony. It can be found on LimeWire
:This was probably before Game was even signed to Aftermath, around the time he was working with JT Tha Bigga Figga. XdiabolicalX 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signing to G-Unit? 

message: Changed gang affiliation from Neighborhood 47 Street, to Neighborhood Rollin 40's.  47 Blocc (47 Street) is a click of the NH Rollin 40's Crips that Jayo belonged to.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.177.37.156 (talk) 18:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rollin 40's 

message: Support split - Discography section takes up close to half of the page and should be split to a new article entitled Jayo Felony discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jayo Felony discography 

message: Hello Wiki community!
Anyone care to help properly contribute to a small but very significant piece of American Hip Hop history? Music history? This is an artist originally discovered by the legendary Jam Master J of Run DMC. Please join myself and original authors in updating the Jayo Felony page all his notable albums (which have all been published here on Wiki for years and now in jeopardy of deletion)
Lets make the great Steven Pruitt proud! 
Thanks!
Spiritletters (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lets make the Wiki great Steve Pruitt proud!  

message: I have aligned the sort keys for the article's default sort and the talk page's list as setting to be "Felony, Jayo". However, the guidelines indicate that articles about people should be sorted by the person's name, as "surname, forename" - but gives no guidance about sorting that way when the article title is the person's stage name. Taken literally, the guidance would suggest this article should be sorted as "Savage, James", but that would only make sense if the article bore the artist's real name. In this case, I found one cited source that referred to this artist as "Felony", as if that was his surname. On that basis, I have used the setting "listas=Felony, Jayo". - Cameron Dewe (talk) 00:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sort keys
Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Shōhō

message: Hi, I noticed that this class of carriers are named as "Zuiho-class" when Japanese sources clearly state it as "Shoho-class". 
As the ships belonged to the IJN, should it not be natural to adopt their naming conventions, instead of propagating the wrong one?
Regards  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.156.183.138 (talk) 06:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: this class of aircraft carriers
Talk:Handel Medallion

message: Apparently there is no online centralized list of medallion winners.  I culled these names by going through all of the Google hits I could find for "Handel Medallion" and "Handel Medalion", but many of those don't give the years they were awarded, thus the list at the bottom of the page.  If somebody can reorganize this, it would be appreciated.  User:Zoe|(talk) 23:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Warren Edwards

message: Before anyone nominates this page for deletion, I want to point out that Warren Edwards is renowned both for his solo work and work with Susan Bennis, is a renowned designer.  He was perhaps better known in the 80s, and the press he garnered at the time is not readily available online.
--Papertrail 23:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:JD Natasha

message: She doesn't use the name JD Natasha professionally anymore. She uses her birth name Natasha Jeannette Dueñas. 
Torowhynot (talk) 17:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to be re-titled. 

message: Would be nice to include the reference to the title from "People en Español" in the "References" section. Jerseycube 20:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing some references 
Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Unryū

message: Needs infobox, and probably a degree of expansion. LordAmeth 19:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Project Assessment

message: There appears to be a typo in the Armor, Armament,... section of this article.  
Her deck armor above the magazines was 25 millimeters (0.98 in) thick, but the deck above the magazines was 56 millimeters (2.2 in) thick
What is the difference between deck armor and deck?  What is the thickness of armor over the engine spaces and over the magazines?? 
Fred4570 (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armor, Armament Typo?
Talk:Jean-Baptiste Mondino

message: What is uncertain, whether he is French or whether he is a fashion photographer?  I don't know his nationality, but I do know he is a fashion photographer.  For example, he did an editorial of Gemma Ward in the (I believe) January 2005 issue of Elle (Fr). 68.80.48.26 21:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jean-Baptiste Ouédraogo

message: *
*
-Indy beetle (talk) 04:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Thoughts on this article's prose and paraphrasing info from sources? -Indy beetle (talk) 23:11, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROSELINE and Paraphrasing Concerns 
Talk:Jean-Claude Trichet

message: Religion? Jewish?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.213.252.224 (talk) 13:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not sure why his religion is relevant. But he's a Roman Catholic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.58.144.199 (talk) 22:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 
Talk:Jean-Claude Van Cauwenberghe

message: I know it is hard to know what was the affair leading to his dismissal, 'cos there are so much... It was not the "ICDI one" (Lucien Cariat & co) indeed (begining of 2006), but the "Caroloregienne affair" (De Spigeleer & co, end of 2005).
Vberger 08:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the ICDI affair
Talk:Japanese cruiser Abukuma

message: The article had Destroyer Division 1 abbreviated as "DesRon 1"; however, "Ron" indicates a squadron, not a division, which would be "Div," so I changed all mention of "DesRon 1" to the complete "Destroyer Division 1."  Does anyone know more about what unit this ship was actually flagship of?  --24.19.69.54 19:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is Destroyer Squadron 1. Thank you for your help. My first citation of the unit was incorrect. In the first years of war a squadron of destroyers was eight ships led by a light cruiser and a division was four ships. Later casualties meant that some squadrons and divisions had fewer ships. Also there was some reorganization. Shibumi2 23:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division or squadron?
Talk:Jean-Daniel Cadinot

message: Does anyone have a non-website citation for JDCs death? Yes, I know he died. I posted the death statement from his website in the article. But technically, according to Wiki's guidelines, we need a non-web citation as a reference for his death. Jodyw1 (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Death cite
Talk:Japanese cruiser Agano

message: Cruisers are listed directly in :Category:Cruisers of Japan and indirectly through its by-class subcategories.  Also certain of these same cruisers are directly in :Category:Cruisers of the Imperial Japanese Navy and indirectly through its by-class subcategories.  Is there some purpose in this duplicative structure? Hmains (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  organization
Talk:Jean-François Jarrige

message: It is desirable that an image of the subject be added to this page. I could not find any free images on Googleimages.-MangoWong ℳ 17:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Vote of no confidence is pass against any political leader of state if the leader go against the constitution of that country , also he also commit corruption 121.52.147.205 (talk) 21:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote of no confidence
Talk:Japanese cruiser Atago

message: "These ships were fast, powerful, and heavily armed with enough firepower to hold their own against any ships built."
That statement requires some qualification; the ships certainly couldn't have fought battleships on equal terms. The statement should probably be "These ships were fast, powerful, and heavily armed with enough firepower to hold their own against any contemporary heavy cruisers built."
65.35.10.174 (talk) 23:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  request for statement qualification
Talk:Japanese cruiser Chikuma (1938)

message: Under the heading Battle of Leyte Gulf it states: “On 26 October 1944, Nowaki was sunk by gunfire from USS Vincennes, Biloxi and USS Miami and DesDiv 103's USS Miller, USS Owen and USS Lewis Hancock.  It sank 65 miles SSE of Legaspi, Philippines with about 1,400 men including all but one of Chikuma's surviving crewmen.”  
The Wiki articles indicate that Nowaki had a complement of 240 and Chikuma 874 which would only total 1,114.  CombinedFleet.com (www.combinedfleet.com) indicates Nowaki had a complement of 240 and Chikuma 850 which would only total 1,090 men, both totals far short of the 1,400 casualties mentioned on the Chikuma Wiki page.  And this assumes that all the crew got off the sinking Chikuma and aboard the doomed Nowaki.  One can wonder at the image of little Nowaki with an additional 850 men on her decks and her skipper struggling to prevent a capsize while engaged in the largest naval battle in history.  It is interesting to note that CombinedFleet.com does not give total casuality figures for the Nowaki sinking only “Lost with all hands, including CHIKUMA survivors.”   StyloK (talk) 23:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties Aboard Chikuma and Nowaki 

message: The two external links listed below do not appear to be working (HTTP 404 error message).
Tabular record: CombinedFleet.com: Chikuma history (Retrieved 26 January 2007.) 
Gallery: US Navy Historical Center 
The TROM for Chikuma can be found here: http://combinedfleet.com/chikuma_t.htm   StyloK (talk) 23:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Report of Dead External Links 

message: What exactly is an "oil geared turbine"? I believe all turbines have oiled gears. Is this some sort of fluid coupling, or what?.45Colt 19:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geared turbine? 

message: "Nakajima E4N2 Type 90-2" - is E4N2 correct? Or should it be E8N? And if not, what did this aricraft look like? WIkipedia has no info on "Nakajima E4N2 Type 90-2"
2A00:20:A016:B27D:303C:EF0C:B51F:E8FC (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 07:33, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft mentioned
Talk:Japanese cruiser Chōkai

message: In this article it says that Chokai was severely damaged by a lucky hit from Kalinin Bay, but in the book "Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors", if I'm remembering correctly, Kalinin Bay's Sister, White Plains was the ship that fired the lucky shot. Can anyone confirm one or the other? AJB93 (talk) 14:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Plains or Kalinin Bay? 

message: In the article on the Takao, it says the original single 4.7in guns were replaced by twin 4.7in guns for a total of eight (the page on the Chokai says 5in guns), and that the number of torpedo tubes was increased to 16. Was this only done to the Takao and not her sister ships? None of the other pages mentions this (except for the Chokai saying it had it's 4x 4.7in guns replaced by "dual purpose twin 5in guns"). It doesn't even mention it on the main page for the Takao-class cruiser, although that page and this one both refer to the "Original armament" in this specs, without saying anything about what came after. Seems kind of lame.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by .45Colt (talk • contribs) 15:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armament. 

message: Regarding the Battle off Samar, the article "USS Samuel B. Roberts" reports that that vessel severed the stern of Chokai, set her bridge afire, then fought her famous gunnery duel with Chikuma, causing damage to that ship's superstructure.
The article "Japanese cruiser Chokai" does not mention USS Samuel B. Roberts; attributes severe damage to a gun hit from an escort carrier destroying her torpedoes; and does not mention any torpedo hits in that engagement.
The article "Japanese cruiser Chikuma" reports that it was Chikuma who had her stern severed, but attributes the torpedo attack to TBF Avengers.  It also makes no mention of USS Samuel B. Roberts.
Can these three articles be brought into agreement?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.9.21.230 (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies in articles "USS Samuel B. Roberts", "Japanese cruiser Chokai", and "Japanese cruiser Chikuma"
Talk:Japanese cruiser Furutaka

message: The lead line says this was the lead ship of a 2-ship class, but there were four ships in the class.  Was it originally intended to be just two, and then supplemented?  Or is the "2-ship" reference just a mistake? Rem01 09:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked this up myself - the third and fourth ships listed as part of the class are in fact part of the Aoba class, which is nearly identical to the Furutaka.  I'm changing the listing of ships accordingly. Rem01 11:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class size 

message: I suggest we move this to Furutaka (Japanese cruiser), or IJN Furutaka. Vice regent 20:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely OPPOSE. The existing title is in conformance with WP:Ships and WP:MIL-Hist format, and is the the same format for every other Imperial Japanese Navy cruiser article in Wikipedia. I find nothing awkward about the title of this article and no justification for change.--MChew (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.  This is the agreed-upon format for Japanese warship article titles. Cla68 (talk) 05:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Awkward title