lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Point-and-shoot camera

message: they're two different types of camaras one is an Advanced Photo System and IF YOU FIND THE OTHER PLEASE EDIT.
--71.114.50.71 23:33, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't make sense, APS is a highly automated 24mm, P&S existed in the 35mm era, with fixed lens/focus 35s, and before that with Kodak Disc System, brownie cameras, etc. Now there's digital P&S. 65.94.77.134 (talk) 09:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

text: Thanks, I guess.  I have no idea what you're trying to say. Dicklyon 17:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just being humorous.  You improved my paragraph.  I rarely feel that the changes to my writing are improvements.--Caleb Murdock 00:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I think it is some interesting information, but since it is not saying the brand shares I believe the title should be renamed. It is not describing market shares, but rather the type of camera (compact or built-in smartphone) used to take photographs. Concerning the second paragraph, I think it should be deleted. Cheers, Zalunardo8 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dear Jim, thank you for your input. I will delete the second paragraph and move the first one to the 'Camera Types' section. Best, Zalunardo8 (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Types

message: I have an editor!  Your edits are very good, Dicklyon.--Caleb Murdock 07:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I guess.  I have no idea what you're trying to say. Dicklyon 17:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just being humorous.  You improved my paragraph.  I rarely feel that the changes to my writing are improvements.--Caleb Murdock 00:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SLRs 

message: Isn't this paragraph kind of silly? Only 1-2 sentences are actually dedicated to talking about market share. It also sounds very sales pitch-y. Remember: this is a wiki, not a Best Buy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.189.52.141 (talk) 05:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is some interesting information, but since it is not saying the brand shares I believe the title should be renamed. It is not describing market shares, but rather the type of camera (compact or built-in smartphone) used to take photographs. Concerning the second paragraph, I think it should be deleted. Cheers, Zalunardo8 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dear Jim, thank you for your input. I will delete the second paragraph and move the first one to the 'Camera Types' section. Best, Zalunardo8 (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market Shares
Talk:Hugh Kennedy (judge)

message: He died on 12 December 1936 not 1934. See: [] Caveat lector 17:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ethylene-vinyl acetate

message: Why does Foam Rubber redirect here?  The article says nothing about it. --Mdwyer 17:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Foam rubber

message: The article states that EVA is also known as ...sometimes simply as "acetate".
Anybody mind if I delete this?  Acetate is not the same as EVA, and this statement is more likely to confuse people than to unconfuse them.  (If somebody puts the sentence back in, could you at least add "inaccurately" in there?) Geoffrey.landis (talk) 20:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing the line was an excellent idea...Pdcook (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleting "sometimes known as Acetate" 

message: The current link to Commons sends you to:  Category:Vinyl acetate 
I tried to change it to:  Category:Ethylene-vinyl_acetate 
but with no success. Somehow it reverts to the old link. It might be to do with the underscore character in the link.
Ziounclesi (talk) 14:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to commons 

message: HI all,
Possibly a remnant over the confusion about acetate which was removed earlier is the reference to EVA in cigarette filters. Its cellulose acetate not EVA (as the redirect link shows). I think the reference to cigarettes in this article should be removed. Biofuelsimon (talk) 14:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cigarette link
Category talk:Marshals of Poland

message: I've moved much of the former category Marshals, which referred only to Polish Marshals, to this category, in order to free up categ Marshals as the owning category for Marshal. That category is now international.
However, it occurs to me this category (Marshals of Poland) now includes Polish Court Marshals and Marshals of Poland and Polish military Marshals. It could also include Sjem Marshals, etc. As such it needs restructuring, but within an overall umbrella category name that includes the title 'Poland' (unlike the previous situation). I think this probably needs a Polish specialist for this work. I'll add a cleancat tag for this. Ian Cairns 17:27, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This category is only for the six Marshals of Poland.  The other marshals require their own categories (there are already categories for Sejm and Senat Marshals).  There is no need for an an umbrella category, since the offices are too different.. Appleseed (Talk) 22:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Further work
Talk:Xploding Plastix

message: Surely the most important thing about this band isn't that one of their songs was looped on a web forum?
: I agree, that doesn't belong in this article. Dilvie 03:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: old discussion

message: This article needs more information, preferably with a well cited biog. The official site contains a pretty good biography, but citing it is difficult as their website is flash based and it is fairly well hidden in the press section. DuncUK (talk) 09:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't need to reference a specific url if one is unavailable due to flash, just reference the site. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 17:43, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Robert Triffin

message: "As a result over the long term he predicted that the system could not maintain both liquidity in confidence, later to be known as Triffin's Dilemma."
As not-native English speaker I hesitate to correct. Should this not be "....liquidity AND confidence,....."?
Pukkie 18:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct :)  Thanks, I will fix that (if it hasn't been). I didn't proofread well. gren グレン 22:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo?
Talk:Cosmos (band)

message: The information on Latvian page should be sourced to Latvian delegation or the management of the band Cosmos. It is official biography of the band that was given out to mass-media for publication. There is no violation of copyrights to reproduce it in the form given, so I kindly ask to remove POSSIBLE COPYRIGHT VIOLATION note.
Andy Mikheev, www.esckaz.com
*Request for confirmation emailed. Conscious 12:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've written a stub article on this subject at this subpage. If you find it appropriate for a starter, I'd be glad to have it moved to replace this current copyvio message of an article.  --Jūzeris 20:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article from scratch
Talk:Warsaw Arsenal

message: Can we have a photo?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:36, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want something done right... :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peugeot 607

message: Is this the right place for all those ramblings about Citroën, ?Hektor 17:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Anyone know where is P607 manufactured? It is plant near Rennes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hornet24 (talk • contribs) 11:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manufacturer plant
Talk:Nakaz

message: Should "Nakaz" be italicized, or no?  I notice it is in the opening sentence and then not later on.  Nice article!  --Khazar 03:39, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cyrillic is customarily not italicized in Wiki. This has been discussed many times before. --Ghirla -трёп- 12:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italics 

message: The section headed "State of the Empire" concludes with this sentence (my emphasis)
"Inconsistencies like this prove that Catherine was trying to use the Enlightenment to enforce her autocratic regime."
That's not an unreasonable conclusion to draw, but I wonder whether it's a viewpoint, rather than an established fact. It's hard to see how such a formulation is anything but a viewpoint -- even if it's a highly persuasive viewpoint.
Prodos (talk) 11:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  State of the Empire 

message: Michael Widener of Yale Law School suggests the Nakaz contributed to Catherine getting the epithet "The Great" CapnZapp (talk) 13:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Great" because of this?
Template talk:Col-begin-small

message: this template essentially performs the same function as template:col-begin but also reduces the text size. it's code needs to be updated though to be similar to template:col-begin which would allow the use of the same variables in ths template. (note that template:col-begin has been pegged for being upgraded to use proper css in the future; see Template talk:Columns for more). --MilkMiruku 17:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would we need a reduced text size? Can we create some suggestions when to use this template? Peter S. 11:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand what this template is used for... -- Cielomobile minor 7 03:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm using it in Irish phonology#References to create two columns of references written in small type. It's usual for references to be written smaller than main text, and putting them in two columns prevents the lines of text from being too long, as well as saving vertical space. —Angr 18:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

message: 210.186.57.77 (talk) 09:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 1 January 2014
Talk:New York State Route 216

message: #Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
A little short to my liking, but you certainly made it comprehensive, JC. Good job.Mitch32contribs 18:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review
Talk:New York State Route 311

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 19:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
Comments
* Usually the lead summarizes the article. Right now, it repeats verbatim a number of the sentences in the article, which makes reading the article a bit redundant.You might rework and condense the lead a bit, it's a bit large for the amount of actual body text.The whole second paragraph of the lede is repeated in the History section (with a couple extra sentences). Done
* Some information in the lede is opinion (relatively populous Lake Carmel) Done
* What does "Originally signed" mean? Total lack of context to the non-road fan.
**It means that's what the route was originally signed/posted as. To me this is self-explanatory - "originally" as in this is what was first there, "signed" as in this is what was posted along the route. See reassurance marker if this is still unclear. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 16:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And yet, to me, when I read it, I thought it meant signed as in signing a signature or other writing. Not everyone is a road fan. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I honestly doubt all non-roadfans will have difficulty grasping the point of "originally signed". Anyway, it appears to have been changed in the article (not by me) so I suppose it's now a non-issue. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 16:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Typical government, okies. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the review. I got the lead issues fixed. Although, because it is a fairly minor route, it doesn't have much of anything to expand it with. Anything that the route passes by is already in the article. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review
Talk:New York State Route 164

message: This article is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates, with a view to nominating it as a Featured Article. Fasach Nua (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, I used that as an example of a short yet comprehensive article. I have no intention of nominating this. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont see why not, if it meets the criteria.... Fasach Nua (talk) 18:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd rather not nominate it, but feel free. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I've found some early history information that I'll add eventually, so it's not completely comprehensive right now. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burning Ears
Talk:New York State Route 308

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
Imzadi1979 (talk) 16:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, I strongly disagree with your delisting. The lead is fine for the length of the article, and it gives a basic overview of the route. Could you please explain to me what issues there are with the GA criteria and completeness? The sections are as long as they can be. This is a route which is just over 6 miles long, and there just isn't any more information which can b e included into the article. If you still think you can find more, I encourage you to try. Also, it had a fine GA review. What wasn't proper about it? It went through all the steps. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Due to the comments of other reviewers on the GA reassessment, and after re-reviewing the article, I had incorrectly delisted. So I am reinstating the article. I apologize about the confusion. Dr. Cash (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 
Talk:New York State Route 292

message: #Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
This article isn't bad, but it needs some work. One, the history isn't too detailed. It just mentions everything after 1924, which I'm sure is not the year the roadway was built. If possible, look into some more pre-numbering facts and throw them in the article. Also, I see lack of non-breaking spaces and certain other thing in the MoS. I have placed the article on hold for now.Mitch32contribs 20:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the non-breaking spaces, but I fail to see the other MoS issues. Could you please specify? Juliancolton The storm still blows... 01:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The non-breaking spaces should have gone in between "NY" and the number, not where they are now. See Interstate 355. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 10:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and fixed them, plus added some where missing. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 10:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Nope, just the major aspects thing is left.Mitch32contribs 01:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, ok. I don't know where I could find maps or such to find history facts prior to 1924, but maybe I'll look in the library or something. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 01:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I find this to be a double standard. Very few NY route articles have pre-1924 history, and six articles that you nominated for Good Article status lack any pre-1924 history. If you thought that those articles were good enough to be Good Articles without pre-1924 history, then what's the issue here? To me, this article comes across as just as good as :New York State Route 428, an article that you nominated for GA that is virtually identical to this article in terms of length, coverage, and imagery. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 10:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, upon looking at both NY 428 and NY 292 side-by-side, I'd say NY 292 compares favorably to NY 428. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 10:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, this article passes after all. Seems we don't need it.Mitch32contribs 13:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review
Talk:24 Hours (The Kleptones album)

message: I've googled the lyrics and some movie quotes, but more quotes need to be added and I certainly couldn't google the instrumental parts. --flatluigi(talk/contrib) 18:00, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that's Billy Bob Thorton in some movie for the quote "I know it doesn't make a lot of sense, but work with me on this...", not Bill Hicks.  Anyone recognize it?  Also, what space mission is the radio chatter from, or does it really matter?
--150.202.8.1 02:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "16:05 - Unfinished Turkey" - 4:38  

message: The article states that John Lennon's version of Imagine is sampled but I don't remember saxophone in Lennon's version so it must be a cover version and therefore not by Lennon. --Nickcin2000 19:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  12:30 Nu Rip Off 

message: I've gotten a fresh look at the track listing adn I"d have to say, though the list is comprehensive, it is lengthy. I can't help but wonder if there's a better way to do it. Any ideas? --flatluigi(talk/contrib) 01:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a YouTube link on the page, but it was removed a few days ago already. Problem solved! --Lijnema 14:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Let 3

message: These guys don't seem to be listed on AMG , which I thought was a pretty comprehensive site. — Apr. 8, '06 [18:05] <[ freakofnurxture]|[ talk]>
: AMG is not suited for Croatian, Serbian or Bosnian music. Even most popular bands are not listed there.
They don't have any Googles or Alexa either. --Dakota ~ ° 18:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahem, excuse me? On google each and every of first 10 links is about them. --Dijxtra 19:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMG 

message: :Sometimes provocative and vulgar lyrics and always shocking live performance with lots of nudity often polarise Nazi Croatian public.
What is this supposed to mean? Roda 20:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi Croatian public? 
Talk:Víctor A. Carreño

message: The corrections made by User:Carreno have been confirmed by mail.  Please let me know if there are any problems with this.  Thanks -- sannse (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Herman Hupfeld

message: *His name sounds Jewish - Did he have any Jewish ancestors? --1523 18:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Very obscure report of his early years. 'Hupfeld studied violin in Germany at 9. He was in the military during World War I...' Which side was he on? 109.154.23.137 (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins? 
Talk:Department S (band)

message: The article said the first release of 'Is Vic there?' was in March 1981 on Demon (Demon D 1003)reaching #22 in the charts then the single was re-released on RCA. The Guinness Book of Singles (given in this article as a source) clearly shows the March 1981 release was on RCA (RCA D 1003). The first release was on Demon on December 29th 1980 (source: Punk Diary by George Gimarc, ). I have corrected this.Vauxhall1964 (talk) 14:53, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong label information 

message: Never has an album sounded less like a live album than Mr Nutley's.  Also, the current line-up surely has a vocalist.WebHorizon (talk) 18:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Nutley's Live?  Current vocalist? 

message: What is it with Wikipedia using pictures of bands thirty years after their heyday?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.249.184.153 (talk) 23:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad picture
Talk:Ocey Snead

message: *John B. Wardlaw I (1817-?) who married Martha Eliza X (1828-1910)
**Caroline B. Wardlaw (1847-1913) b. September 24, 1854, who married X Martin.
***Ocey Wardlaw Martin (c1880-1909) who married her first cousin Fletcher Wardlaw Snead (1875-1955)
****Mary Alberta Snead (1908)
****David Pollock Snead (1909-1910)
**Mary E.L. Wardlaw (1849-?) who married Fletcher Tillman Snead (1829-1891)
***Fletcher Wardlaw Snead (1875-1955) who married her first cousin Ocey Wardlaw Martin (c1880-1909)
****Mary Alberta Snead (1908)
****David Pollock Snead (1909-1910)
**Virginia G. Wardlaw (1852-1910)
**John B. Wardlaw II (1854-?), reverend
**Albert G. Wardlaw (1856-?), reverend
**Bessie Warldaw (c1861-?) who married a Spindle
This article is very muddled and lacking in a coherent presentation of facts regarding the event (her murder) that supposedly makes this woman notable enough for a Wikipedia article.  It also contains repititious information regarding family members and their birthdate.  I have attempted to edit and clarify. 165.189.169.190 (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genealogy of Ocey Martin

message: The article cited is a book review and does not contain the information it is supposedly verifying.—D'Ranged 1 VTalk 13:23, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious tag for book review