Talk:Istanbul trials of 1919–1920

message: Is this article written by Guenter Lewy himself? It looks like an exact copy of his denialist thesis, discarding 100% of the trials and 100% of the evidences because of supposed propaganda and because the Ottoman justice works differently than the American one. The verdict is presented as "gifts to the authority". This article is a total non-sense and lack of rigor. --Kremtak 11:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About this article... 

message: This article is mostly OR, even the claim that it was called Turkish Martial Court because of the targeted subject is OR. Adding the tag. Drosophilawhodoestnotfly 18:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: OttomanReference, how many FORK will you be creating?

message: To "Turkish Courts-Martial of 1919–20" (note the en-dash in the date range).  71.41.210.146 00:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technically, it should be renamed... 

message: Armenian document forgery (2006) 
by Türkkaya Ataöv
Therefore this person (Türkkaya Ataöv) is a revisionist. Please stop including him as a source, and use the texts inside the quotations that are marked, instead of forging content. Thank you. --92slim (talk) 22:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deniers - identify their sources 

message: The topic of this article looks similar to the article Prosecution of Ottoman war criminals What do you think?  الأفعى (talk) 04:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article looks similar to another article 

message: The newspaper image dated November 4, 1918 expresses the Three Pashas fleeing abroad but it does not mention anything like "Their response to eliminate the Armenian problem was to attempt the elimination of the Armenians themselves.", the source of this quote misinforms deliberately. Spiny14 (talk) 17:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *Reply: The article clearly quotes the historical publication.  // Timothy :: talk  20:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *:Can you show me the quote in the newspaper by just underlining? Because it does not have the quote so I cannot see it. Spiny14 (talk) 20:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *::It's in ottoman Turkish which I certainly cannot read. If the text cannot be verified by an editor or rs translation( Ideally preceeding its inclusion on Wikipedia) it will have to go. (t · c) buidhe 21:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *:::I can read Ottoman Turkish, and its headline is just "اوچ پاشا داها قاچدي / Üç paşa daha kaçtı" meaning "Another three pashas have fled", nothing to do with the so-called translation quote in the article Spiny14 (talk) 22:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *::::The source for the quote is a WP:RS and your "translation" is WP:OR. The article clearly translates the passage. You are free to put in the article headline, but not to remove sourced material.  // Timothy :: talk  22:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *:::::What makes that source reliable? My question is too simple and easy to be answered? Where is the quote in the newspaper? It does not have such an expression. The article does not clearly translate the passage. There is just a low-resolution highlighted newspaper image and mistranslation. I presented what is written in the headline above, and you can see and compare easily. I do not remove the material but the mistranslation. Spiny14 (talk) 09:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *::::::If you wish to add the headline (which is also translated in the sources), I have no objection. You cannot removed sourced quotes showing the relevance of the item.  // Timothy :: talk  09:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *:::::::Bu that's the essence of the matter, that translation is not true. When looking at the newspaper Ikdam dated Nov 4, 1918, one cannot see such an expression that can be translated. Source is problematic. Spiny14 (talk) 10:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *::::::::I don't think this is a reliable source. Both sources are op-eds, thus not considered a reliable source for anything but the author's opinion. The authors do not meet WP:SPS and do not speak Ottoman Turkish. I think it's most likely the source got the translation from Wikipedia, where it has been since at least February 2016. (t · c) buidhe 17:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Newspaper Image