Talk:Women's cricket

message: There used to be a photo in this article of a girl playing cricket.  Why was it deleted in February 2010?  Wi2g Wi2g 21:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why image deletion? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Women's cricket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120727033145/http://www.vdca.ca/index.jsp?page_id=MAIDENS to http://www.vdca.ca/index.jsp?page_id=MAIDENS
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121107124239/http://www.icc-cricket.com/match_zone/historical_ranking.php to http://www.icc-cricket.com/match_zone/historical_ranking.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Women's cricket's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "mostruns":
From List of international cricket centuries by Younis Khan: 
From List of international cricket centuries by Chris Gayle: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Women's cricket]] 

message: When I start on a biography or piece of women's history, I like to leave my thoughts and intentions on the Talk page. It's a way for myself and others to see what I have planned, as I may be working on and off on a page for some time. It also provides a place for other editors to add suggestions and discuss intended improvements or contribute themselves.
Women's Cricket:
Initial plan is to take pages such as Women's association football, Women's Australian rules football and Roller derby as examples and build the page out from there.
* Add Infobox (complete)
* Rewrite lead (complete but may need to expand as page grows)
* Find illustrative pictures
** Historical (Four seems like enough)
** Modern with an equal weight of England and Australian women and South Asian and black women
***T20
***ODIs
***Tests
***Domestic
*New/revised sections
**Laws and gameplay
***Women's influence on the game (ie, bodyline & overarm bowling)
***Language (complete)
***Rule modifications
****Test (complete)
****ODI (complete)
****International T20 (complete)
****Laws of Cricket (complete)
****Diagram of the difference in field size (complete)
****Other rule modifications
***Clothing and equipment (complete)
****Expand further (complete)
**International
***Competitions
****Results boxes
****Further detail on each competition
*****Asia Cup (complete)
*****World Cup (complete)
*****Euro Championship
*****Kwibuka (complete)
*****T20 World Cup 
***Tests
***ODIs
***T20
***Contested trophies (complete)
***Multi-sport events (complete)
**Domestic
***By country (complete)
***Expand section 
**Parasports
***Blind cricket (complete)
****Update with 2023 IBSA Games
***Deaf cricket
**Challenges
***Attitudes to women's cricket
***Format and opportunities
***Sexism and Femininity
***Media coverage
***Pay
***Other barriers
**Records (this is cricket, after all)
***Test (complete)
***ODI
***T20
***Any other records worth noting
MsJoat (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan for Improvement  

message: The statement on the 2028 olympics is to definitive. The decision follows in October in Mumbai and the source seem to be from last year, but includes a newer date. The decision was not made in February as the cited Article claims.--Maphry (talk) 22:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing that out to me. I've reworded it and added an additional source about the final decision. MsJoat (talk) 11:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olympics