lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Throbbing Gristle

message: Throbbing Gristle were known as an "Industrial" group. In fact, they were one of the first groups to be known to make "industrial music". This should be mentioned Dunk meister 22:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Especially since many "Industrial purists" will not accept groups other than TG to have the designation of Industrial under their genre no matter how similar. Xe7al (talk) 22:33, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Industrial

message: This band used to use ultrasonic at their concerts a lot and I think this needs to be mentioned.  DyslexicEditor 05:12, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Ultrasonic Info

message: is there any reason this should be below the influences and trivia section? revert. AlexOvShaolin 15:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wish you would've looked at the substance of the edit before simply reverting it.  I don't really care where the sections go--but the live discography on this page is simply dead weight, being the same as the info on Throbbing Gristle live.  --Jackhorkheimer 20:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  more important info should come first, a brief overview of the live TG should be put in the section on this page a la Coil (band) --AlexOvShaolin 23:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TG live 

message: There's a "Beginning" section and an "End" section" - but no "middle", a period of four years of activity isn't even mentioned... Totnesmartin 09:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle 

message: I've never heard of, and can find no other online references to "classical composers such as Austin Bedell and Raphael Villalobos"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.213.158.45 (talk) 17:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mystery Men

message: What's with all the bootleg albums in the discography? Daniel Christensen (talk) 15:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bootlegs
Talk:Primary biliary cholangitis

message: This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yangk59, Nadees1, Yange11.
== antibiotic trigger?
 ==
Can use of antibiotics be cited as a rare trigger for cholangitis as per the page on cholestasis 2.25.85.166 (talk) 12:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: — Assignment last updated by JMR2024 (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Amin Jenna Deep Explore
Talk:Jason Rohrer

message: Moved this off the Konspire2b page, but comments are welcome as to whether it's encyclopaedic?  Ojw 14:33, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Was probably marginal in 2004, but since Rohrer has resurfaced in a completely different context (indie/art games) and gotten a bunch of press for it, he's definitely notable now. --Delirium (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just made a lot of changes to this article, notably creating a Games section and moving relevant info from the introduction into that section. They're a little bare-bones, but I plan to do some polishing in the future. Goodbye Galaxy (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: This article refers to Rohrer and may contain information valuable to improving this article.  In particular:
::Two years ago, almost no one had heard of Jason Rohrer. Then he made Passage, a brief but powerful meditation on mortality that created a stir even before it caused Clint Hocking, the creative director at Ubisoft, the world’s fourth-largest game company, to shed tears. Hocking used Passage to publicly indict his colleagues at last year’s conference. “Why can’t we make a game that . . . means something?” Hocking asked. “A game that matters?”
:- BalthCat (talk) 05:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The NY Times Magasine 

message: This diff appears to be vandalism: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jason_Rohrer&diff=prev&oldid=762165365
The sentence that was added doesn't make sense: "Rohrer is a friend of famed content-adjacent developer, Andy Lin." 
The phrase "content-adjacent developer" doesn't seem to have any meaning.  
The person's name may not be a real person; there is a reference at one of Rohrer's web sites, http://thecastledoctrine.net/contestResults.php , to an "Andy Lin" as the name of an artist, but there is no other source provided for this information about this person.
The only other edit from a user with the same IP address as this anonymous editor is apparent vandalism, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merkin&diff=prev&oldid=773844526
Mherdeg (talk) 04:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent vandalism in "personal life"
Talk:Micrographia

message: The Categories this page is in belong to 1664; the lead para states 1665.  Trev M  ~  18:41, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Although it was completed earlier, the book was published in 1665 with a second edition released post-conflagration in 1667.
CastWider (talk) 22:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1664 or 1665? 

message: Micrographia has been credited with containing the first image of a microbe as viewed down a microscope, namely mould on a book.Gest, H. (2004). The discovery of microorganisms by Robert Hooke and Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, fellows of the Royal Society. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 58(2), 187–201.
CastWider (talk) 22:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First image of microorganism 

message: Hooke has been accused of plagiarizing pictures of snowflakes in Micrographia (which has itself been extensively plagiarized by others) Ford, B. J. (2010). The Cheat and the Microscope: Plagiarism Over the Centuries. Microscope, 58(1), 21–32.
CastWider (talk) 22:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible plagiarism

message: This could be shortened or cut. It reads like it's there to advertise the professor in question, rather than because it makes any particularly significant points. Ben Finn (talk) 17:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Methods section
Talk:Flesh & Blood (Poison album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 18:47, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Cache Creek (Kern County, California)

message: There's also a Cache Creek in Northern California, with it's headwaters being Clear_Lake, in Lake County CA. The Clear Lake article incorrectly references this article as the Cache Creek it feeds. Here's a few links to the other Cache Creek: 
*CACHE CREEK NATURAL AREA - BLM/Ukiah
*Cache Creek Conservancy
* The Putah-Cache Bioregion Project
* Clear Lake and Cache Creek flow data/CA Dept. of Water Resources
Should I start a stub for this creek? and will this Cache Creek be disambiguated by Category?
--scupper 14:55, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Former Yugoslav Republic Of Macedonia

message: Double redirect, should point to Macedonia QueenCake (talk) 16:58, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Amalthea 17:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

message: The Republic of Macedonia has been moved with overwhelming consensus to North Macedonia. Requesting that the redirect is updated to North Macedonia to reflect this change.  ✿ SilentResident ✿  (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 12:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 15 February 2019
Talk:Pope Leo VIII

message: What famous encyclopedia?
--
In the List of popes, Leo VIII:s predecessor is Benedict V and successor John XIII. The respective articles seem to state Leo's term as antipope as his true papacy, and thus name the predeccors and successors in other order. Is this a tradition ?  --Kummi 20:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did this Pope really serve during the Saeculum obscurum? According to the entry on that period, he did not. Sabre ball t  c  19:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saeculum obscurum 

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IVQ-1t92hA&t=2s
Considering how old the source of this video is, is it in the public domain? It would be a great addition to this article Corevette (talk) 19:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add public domain(?) recording of pope
Talk:Facilitation (organisational)

message: I found it interesting that this page focuses on meeting facilitation. Generally the practice of facilitation is applied to a much wider range of group interactions.
Good morning, User 216.254.22.58.  Why don't you edit the Facilitation article to bring in the wider range of application? Cheers!
User: Thseamon  Dec. 20, 2004
I agree with this comment. Also, facilitated decision making may involve aspects other than concensus.
I agree with the comment about broadening the decision-making aspect to include more than consensus I would also like to see the comment about "impartial" facilitation removed because while this is true for many instances of facilitation it is certainly not true for all. COCoFacilitation (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

message: There is an interesting wiki-based project that attempts to name and describe the processes that are used in group facilitation.  See
Group Pattern Language for a summary of such patterns with associated pictures. Please consider adding this (or a similar) link to the external links section.  (I'm not adding it because I'm not a expert on this topic.) VoteFair (talk) 21:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support such a change as much facilitation occurs in non profit , state, and voluntary sectors and the term business is misleading and a bit vague. The names Facilitation (meetings) ,and  Facilitation (group process) suggest themselves. Lumos3 (talk) 22:46, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

text: Couldn't agree more with this proposal, in fact, the notion of business facilitation can mean something else not related to group process facilitation and both would be different professional activities. 
I also would propose to remove the Warning on lack of references as this was addressed already. Who would be so kind to proceed with this? Nunesdea (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group process patterns 

message: I'm wondering what the process is for changing the (business) term associated this general description of meeting facilitation to something like (meetings) which I think is more general and appropriate for the content of this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by COCoFacilitation (talk • contribs) 17:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support such a change as much facilitation occurs in non profit , state, and voluntary sectors and the term business is misleading and a bit vague. The names Facilitation (meetings) ,and  Facilitation (group process) suggest themselves. Lumos3 (talk) 22:46, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

text: Couldn't agree more with this proposal, in fact, the notion of business facilitation can mean something else not related to group process facilitation and both would be different professional activities. 
I also would propose to remove the Warning on lack of references as this was addressed already. Who would be so kind to proceed with this? Nunesdea (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing business-centric title for this general article on meeting facilitation
Talk:Consumer debt

message: *"Critics of consumer debt decry the practice as an example of an emphasis on instant gratification over long-term fiscal prudence." Says who? Critic who? Let's just get rid of the credit market, it's "bad". You know, there is a limit of what kind of stupid things can be written, that limit was crossed here. - Jerryseinfeld 16:49, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think the deleted viewpoint is quite sane; I'm sorry you can't respect views that don't agree with yours. Cazort 00:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense

message: The article says that "consumer debt is considered detrimental." Could we get some useful citation here before a judgement is made? That sentence is clearly NPOV and should be removed unless we can find a reputable economist or financial advisor to quote here. I'm going to try to remove the slanted view presented here.
sebmol 20:44, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consumer debt detrimental? 

message: This article implies that Mortgage debt - which is secured, may not be part of consumer debt. This contradicts the article on Consumer Credit Risk, I would like this common question to be addressed but am unable to adequately answer it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.92.49.122 (talk) 20:46, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mortgage debt 

message: On the other hand, credit card debt is almost unknown just across the sea in Japan and China, one because of long-standing cultural taboos against personal debt, the other because the economy is still underdeveloped. 
:: Japan is a developed country.  --Natkeeran (talk) 16:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Sentence 

message: Consumers Step Up Their Borrowing 10.January.2012
97.87.29.188 (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WSJ]] resource 

message: I keep hearing stories on the news about how student debt in the U.S. has surpassed credit card debt in the aggregate, and is now behind only mortgage debt.  This article could use stats on different types in various countries and time periods. -- Beland (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics needed
Talk:List of knowledge management concepts

message: I started this page to give a feel for the central areas that KM covers. Please help Dgrey 16:54, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy to support that, no one has been particularly involved and there are simply too many knowledge management articles - and none of them are very good--Snowded TALK 20:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Councils of Sirmium

message: The article states that "[t]he Council of Sirmium generally refers to the third of the four ecumenical councils held in Sirmium between 357 AD and 359 AD." (my emphasis)
Is it correct to say that councils in Sirmium were ecumenical? The Wikipedia article Ecumenical council does not mention any Ecumenical Council in Sirmium. Aleksandar Katanovic (talk) 01:06, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a gray area but I would say "no". By the same token I would argue that making the blanket statement that any council was ecumenical, outside the context of a specific church communion, is inappropriate. In reality the term ecumenical has tended to be applied ex post facto based on which prescriptions of faith a given communion of bishops has chosen to accept. Typically on Wikipedia the term is used to apply the viewpoint of the Roman Catholic and Protestant churches simply because most editors come from that perspective. But this is not really NPOV. --Mcorazao (talk) 15:19, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecumenical councils in Sirmium?

message: The section Triumph of the Nicene Creed seems decidedly off-topic, at least in the way that it is written. It is talking almost entirely about how the results of the Sirmium councils were later overturned. A reader could easily misread this to think that the Sirmium councils actually resulted in the acceptance of Nicene orthodoxy. Regardless, what happened later is not, strictly speaking relevant to this article.
A Legacy or Aftermath section might be appropriate but, even at that, this section would need to be more clear than the current section.
--Mcorazao (talk) 15:14, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I took care of it. Wikipedia grinds slowly, but exceedingly fine. 70.213.17.98 (talk) 23:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 
Talk:Culture of Kraków

message: Some listings in this article are less valuable than others. The listing of "cinemas" - or the movie theatres in Krakow - would have little to do with the actual culture of Krakow since cinemas are not much different from convenience stores. Any comments?Poeticbent 23:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cinemas 

message: The articles can be put into a category and looked up there. For all else: WP:NOT#TRAVEL WP:NOT#DIR  -- Matthead discuß!     O       20:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this for? 

message: It became the residence of two Polish Nobel laureates in literature: Wisława Szymborska and Czesław Miłosz. True, but so what ?  They are not tourist attractions (one cannot just call at W.S. and have a tea and a chat with her), and the fact that a place has Nobel laureates as residents doesn't make it more (or less) cultural.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jotel (talk • contribs) 14:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residence 

message: More fit for wiki travel - most of the links need double checking and the list astyle and over reliance on ext links embedded in the text is atrocious.
The more i read it is not about the culture of krakow - but as my reading polish is zilch - I cannot do much SatuSuro 18:05, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is ...
Talk:Joseph Gallieni

message: Although some English WP references use "é", I find no reference in my print sources that do so, nor in the French WP. A couple places give his first name as "Joseph-Simon", dunno how authoritative though. Stan 17:38, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Any serious student of the First World War knows that the French contribution was very much greater than tends to remembered in Anglo-Saxon history. However, the "taxicab army" was a mere five battalions in a battle involving four or five armies on the Allied side, and in an attack which did not itself succeed. I've no evidence that it was planned as propaganda, but it was certainly used that way. Paulturtle (talk) 03:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Super FX

message: Does anybody else think this article shouldn't be considered a stub anymore? As far as I know that is all the info on the Super FX and Super FX 2 chips in the article. Anybody else's opinion?
:It could use more information on the hardware specs, as well as details on Mode 7 capabilities. Andre (talk)  18:48, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
::Mode 7 is on the SNES hardware, not the super FX, or can superFX layer backgrounds as well? De-stubbing. 65.12.0.56 00:56, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: This article misses some info in List of Super NES enhancement chips#Super FX.
104.228.101.152 (talk) 23:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Super NES enhancement chips
Talk:Security Service of Ukraine

message: This is "history" page on the official site of SBU. First, it says "March 25, 1992 - the official date of the establishment of the Ukrainian special service. On this day, the Verkhovna Rada adopted the Law on the Security Service of Ukraine.". This is not 20 September 1991, as said on our page. Secondly, the history section of our page begins from 1918, when it was a different state and a different organization. In particular, All-Ukrainian Cheka was a completely different organization. I am not sure providing such history was a good idea, although providing this as "Background" might be OK. My very best wishes (talk) 02:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the organization
Talk:Advantages and disadvantages of pesticides and biological control in agriculture

message: This is an improper subject heading, as it does not link to anything else. It should only exist as a sub-heading link under Agriculture, Pesticides, Biological Control.
:Giving a quick skim read, the content is quite similar to Biological pest control, perhaps they can be merged? quercus robur 19:25, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Flagship (company)

message: Shouldn't we just link to the games in question, rather than have descriptions both here and on the respective pages for the games?
Also, the last line - "Green usually does nothing of importance, but red and blue do some pretty big things." - makes no sense here, so I'm removing it. Troublekit 18:41, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That wasn't really too nonsensical, it referred to the kinstones, but is probably better left for the full article on The Minish Cap. -- WikidSmaht (talk) 07:24, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Descriptions of games

message: What exactly does this mean? That they created demos? Trailers? Or that they wrote up storylines and laid out parts or all of the plot? -- WikidSmaht (talk) 07:24, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Scenarios

message: The article does not seem to meet WP:COMPANY, as there are no reliable third-party publications that cover the company in detail. I updated the Capcom article recently and there is even more information on Flagship there than in this very article, so a redirect to Capcom#Former subsidiaries looks reasonable to me. The only thing the Flagship article currently offers that the Capcom one does not is a list of games Flagship has worked on, but that might be better off in a stand-alone list. Prime Blue (talk) 22:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion
Talk:Afterburner (disambiguation)

message: I moved the disambiguation page from Afterburner to Afterburner (disambiguation), and made Afterburner redirect to Afterburner (engine) since
#Afterburner (engine) has twice as many links as the second place meaning, Afterburner (album).
#The original meaning of afterburner is the engine modification, so someone making a bare link in the future probably means Afterburner (engine), not one of the other meanings.
Dbenbenn 18:46, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Dorchester, New Brunswick

message: The municipal aspect of community in New Brunswick has not superseded the more universal understanding of the English language word. As if the legislative shortcomings should have such reach. Failing to provide accurate descriptors for the districts/regions is yet another example of the reform's characteristic community fragmentation. Insisting the use of "village" must adhere to New Brunswick local government law, in absence of explanatory modifier in an encycolpedia or in general usage, is asinine. 
Like in this case of Dorchester, New Brunswick, if in the header of a community article it is said that a village (which BTW was a village in  official provincial government documents prior to incorporation as a "village" according to the to legislation). While formerly afforded village municipal status, ever since the municipalities and concurrent annexation of certain territory in unincorporated units, there remains a village not defined by the former municipality. 
No amount of referencing the municipal law in the province substantiates its use in place of the meaning of village. What we are seeing is a possessiveness. To undertake the separation of the municipal aspect of community from the greater community is what we are tasked with. There has been created the need for clarification as is evidenced in efforts of the new municipalities themselves in choices for official names that avoid the municipal type. You will see I have made a modification, therefor. 
I will also note here that it is unfortunate that we see the degradation of articles because of those editors who look to update the specific language without consideration of the remainder. 
@Hwy43, @G. Timothy Walton, @Roncanada, @Canterbury Tail PonapsqisHous (talk) 13:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village Usage