Talk:Jewish Institute for National Security of America

message: From looking at their website, it is unclear whether JINSA is a truly neoconservative organization. Their organization does boast prominent neocons as members and occupying high positions in it, but there are also prominent liberal Democrats involved in JINSA.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.231.176.125 (talk • contribs) 07:43, 13 October 2005
:In this context, I think the label "neoconservative" means supportive of the right wing in Israel, particularly the Likud opposition to any accomodation with the Palestinians and Israel's neighbors. The problem is that "neoconservative" has a history that isn't as restrictive as that usage. Who are the liberal Democrats you found? Al-mustaqbal 01:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  the article links to American neoconservatism and considering that it has not declared itself as such I would argue that this characterization of an organization is in violation of Wikipedia's neutrality policy. If youd rather, feel free to include it in allegations but it should not be in the lead. I will most likely be removing this unnecessary attribution unless a valid argument can be produced as to how this is pertinent. Bgrus22 (talk) 07:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is JINSA neoconservative? 

message: The quotation attributed to "Frontline, an Indian current affairs magazine" is factually incorrect almost in its entirety. The date given for JINSA's founding is 1997. The website of the organization lists 1976. The list of names as those who serve on JINSA's board of directors is all wrong. Perhaps the magazine reporter meant the group's board of advisors. Still, according to JINSA's own website, only one of those listed does serve on that board - Richard Perle, which the magazine spelled incorrectly. Feith and Cheney were advisory board members in the past.
Also, I have never heard of any links between this organization and Israel's Likud Party. They certainly seem to meet with Labor Party officials as much as Likud Party officials. What about the ruling party in Israel, Kadima? Do they meet with them?
This entire entry really needs to be cleaned up.
Chronos1966 04:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the "Frontline" magazine info is clearly incorrect and should be removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jewish Institute for National Security of America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160301161715/http://www.jinsa.org/programs/military-academies-program/military-academies-program-israel/about-military-academies-progr to http://www.jinsa.org/programs/military-academies-program/military-academies-program-israel/about-military-academies-progr
*Added  tag to http://www.jinsa.org/articles/view.html?documentid=1071
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: and almost certainly was written by someone with a conflict of interest (WP:PROMO, WP:COI). It desperately requires an overhaul using independent secondary sources of quality.Nishidani (talk) 16:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed, I would be happy to assist you if youre working on a draft. Bgrus22 (talk) 06:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's very kind of you. Unfortunately I don't have much time, even for contributing to articles that interest me.Nishidani (talk) 08:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is self-promotional 

message: Claims should either be fixed or removed in this section, I will give it some time and if it is not fixed when I return I will be removing these unverified claims in accordance with wikiguidelines. Bgrus22 (talk) 07:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the page references the primary source material, ie an unacceptable practice. Bgrus22 (talk) 08:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove "other policy recommendations" that have not been cited 

message: Better to have a description that isn't from the source. Doug Weller talk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph of lead is self-sourced