lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Howard le Peton

message: If that's clearly established well, ok. Wow. I played cricket once, that makes me notable? Again, just wow. --IvoShandor (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The subject of the article played first-class cricket. Please see WP:CRIN. Andrew nixon (talk) 09:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess I'll just never understand why athletes don't have to meet the general notability guideline. Whatever, doesn't matter I s'pose, maybe it'll change one day. Useless article is still useless. --IvoShandor (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think playing for the national team of one's country is generally considered an automatic achievement of notability. He most likely played more of the game to be chosen in the first place, but there are no records of it (at least not in the article). This is much the same thing as every participant to the Olympics being generally held notable, even if little to nothing is known about them. Circeus (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clearly
Talk:Moving Wallpaper/Echo Beach

message: God this is awful!
It really needs to be rewritten from scratch, ignoring all the hype and with sourcing of the quality of the Guardian piece. --Tony Sidaway 04:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Awful

message: I think this should be two seperate articles, Echo Beach and Moving Wallpaper. They are obviously connected, but they are scheduled seperately as being two different shows. Imo it makes more sense to deal with them as being almost like spin offs of each other; and on Wikipedia spin off shows get their own articles. --86.148.57.131 (talk) 19:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split up the articles
Talk:List of United States Navy Guided Missile Launching Systems

message: Neither have been adopted by the USN, but since we already include the Mk 48, should the various mods be included as well?
--Chrthiel (talk) 21:52, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct. The launchers have been given designations by the USN but not adopted. I suspect that since they were developed jointly by the USN for an export customer they should be included. The various models for each launcher would make this list to long. If a full article for each launcher is written it should go there. Two way time (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mk 48 Mod 0, 1, 2, 3/Mk 56
Talk:Gaston Litaize

message: I'll try to fix this when I get a chance but the Henry Willis who commented on Litaize was probably H. W. 3rd. The present article links to the article on "Father" Henry Willis who had died 30 years before the Musical Times piece was published and some years before Litaize was born.43hellokitty21 (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not that Henry Willis
Talk:Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993

message: The in the text of the act (i.e. the official version), the title of the act doesn't have macrons. Should the Macrons be removed from the title of the wikipedia page? See http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0004/latest/DLM289882.html Stuartyeates (talk) 22:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  macrons 

message: Articles should only have one title, although alternative names may be mentioned in the lead.
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) dictates: "The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources (for example other encyclopedias and reference works). ... If one name is clearly most commonly used in the English-language references for the article, we should probably use it. If (as will happen occasionally) something else is demonstrably more common in reliable sources for English as a whole, and this is not a question of national varieties of English, use that instead."
Google searches suggest that "Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993" is used slightly more than "Māori Land Act 1993", although the figures are comparable.  Usage (including in the Act itself) also appears to favour the former (Māori) version, as it appears first when both are mentioned.  Therefore, I suggest that this version be adopted in the title, despite the usual convention to use English names.
I also suggest redirects from:
*Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 / Māori Land Act 1993 (current title, which will redirect from the move)
*Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 / Maori Land Act 1993 (without diacritics, which will need to be updated to avoid a double-redirect)
*Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (proposed title)
*Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 (proposed title, without diacritic)
*Māori Land Act 1993 (English title)
*Māori Land Act 1993 (English title, without diacritic)
—sroc (talk) 15:49, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to [[Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993]]
Talk:List of Di-Gata Defenders spells

message: The Di-Gata Defenders article was getting too long, and the list of spells was part of the problem. So I decided to split the article to this sub-section. Edit it with proper table tags (just copy one row, paste it depending on caster, and modify). Enjoy :) Hellwolf36 04:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled 1]

message: This is Wikipedia, not Di-Gata Defenders Wikia. Delete it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.101.75.175 (talk) 20:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled 2]
Talk:Art Institute of Colorado

message: This school is a joke and they take money from students who think that they are going to get a good education when really they walk away having paid 80,000 dollars and not much to show for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.204.153.79 (talk) 05:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled section

message: I wanna know how much it is 47.221.219.29 (talk) 06:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuition
Talk:Paul Wolfowitz/Archive 1

message: Where are all the photos gone which I saw some days ago? I wanted to store one or two in my computer ;-)
Just a short comment. It is one point to be convinced that a regime like Saddam's is a weapon of mass destruction in itself. But it will become dangerous if one works out strategies to overcome such states. You will be confronted with unforeseen and uncalculable effects of your action. I doubt whether one could be ever successful in changing the world by means of political action or steering (even as president of World Bank)--Ennia 19:31, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Purdy, Tennessee

message: The source on file for the article states that Purdy was established in 1825. The source looks reliable to me, overall. 
The signs in Purdy, however, read "Welcome to Purdy Established 1823". 
What is correct? doxTxob \ talk 20:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: When was it established?

message: I moved the following from the Folklore subsection until the facts are referenced: "The facts are that Col. Hurst moved from the Hurst Mansion in later life, sick and broke, and died in Mt. Gilead. He was not murdered." Any help is welcome. doxTxob \ talk 22:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced fact

message: How was it the county seat if not incorporated? 2A00:23C7:E287:1900:6164:96C7:764C:41AC (talk) 13:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Unincorporated
Template talk:Building information modeling

message: What makes a "full" 'building information modeling package' compared to a "compatible" one? This seems like a pretty strange distinction to me. In fact, what makes a "Building information  modeling package" at all, anyway? IFC compatability? If so perhaps we should rename the template to 'IFC comptible packages'.... 
As far as I can see, the term 'Building information modelling' is so broadly applied that to distinguish one package from another based on it, seems pretty absurd. Miscreant 05:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, but that's life at the moment in BIM. I would say that IFC compatibility is what is now being termed OpenBIM because basically any CAD package which allows you to add data about the objects is building *information* modelling/management software.--duncan.lithgow (talk) 21:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Ridgewood Preparatory School

message: Claims with no citation have been marked in accordance with Wikipedia's editing policies. The information should not be removed, however, until a reasonable time has passed with no correction. Please assume good faith and wait before removing article content.--Runnermonkey 05:47, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced materials 
Talk:Humvee clone manufacturing in China

message: This needs images of the SAC SFQ2040
70.29.208.129 (talk) 09:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: photos

message: The lede seems confused. Are there three or two copies?Paul, in Saudi (talk) 15:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Three or Both?

message: Currently suggesting a merge of (most) info to Dongfeng EQ2050 and Dongfeng CSK-131 from the Dongfeng Mengshi article. Ominae (talk) 02:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, in part because that doesn't resolve the issue with Shenyang and Xiaolong sections. Klbrain (talk) 22:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion of merge
Talk:Michelle Ehlen

message: I have updated the article to use list-defined references, since the density of references in the content made it difficult to edit.
I have added dead link for the Click List ref: this should be available from the Wayback Machine, but they are down for maintenance this weekend so I will check again later. --Mirokado (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Government of Nazi Germany

message: I would like to move this page ("Organization of the Third Reich") to "Government of Nazi Germany" or "Organization of Nazi Germany" for two reasons:
* Uniformity in name with the much larger page Nazi Germany, which prefers Nazi Germany to "Third Reich"
* The term "Third Reich" originates from Nazi propaganda as a means of legitimating the "Third Reich" as a true successor to the "First" and "Second" Reichs; I don't think this should be used when a more neutral alternative exists.
As for "Government" vs. "Organization", I lean towards "Government", given that almost all sections of this page are directly part of the government. I know there was a considerable fusion of private institutions into the government of Nazi Germany so both seem applicable. I welcome comment; I will move in a couple weeks if I receive no objections by then.-Ich (talk) 13:54, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: All organizations should have the original, untranslated German title in subheadings, italics or  parentheses. This is standard in most works of referncee. After a number of Wiki searches, I have still not been able to track down the Propaganda Ministry's German title. Orthotox (talk) 21:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Original German

message: Nazi Germany under the leadership of Adolf Hitler as the new leader 41.246.143.17 (talk) 13:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Regular Northwest Face of Half Dome

message: According to the article:
Although the first ascent took five days, most ascents now are accomplished in two. The record for the fastest ascent of the route is one hour, twenty-two minutes and was set during a solo ascent in late May 2012 by Alex Honnold, who had previously recorded the first free solo ascent in 2008. This improved on a longstanding record of 1:53 set in October 1999 by Jim Herson and Hans Florine.
The difference between the standard and fastest times is mind-boggling.  It would be interesting to know what factors contribute to the huge difference between the two days required for most ascents and the 1:22 current record; and also between the old and new records.  Is it entirely a matter of immense skill and stamina?  Do the speed climbers practice the route many times with safety equipment to plan their moves?  Is free soloing inherently much faster than other types of climbing because no time is spent in placing equipment or keeping the group together?  These are probably all very obvious to experts, but some (sourced) context would be very helpful for the rest of us.  Thanks.  --Amble (talk) 19:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: How were the speed records set?

message: The subject of this article is not a book, movie, television program, newspaper, ship, or any other work that is commonly rendered in italics, as far as I am aware. Can someone please enlighten me? Otherwise, I propose that the italics be removed. 1980fast (talk) 22:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this italicized? 

message: The page is missing the Lowe brothers first winter ascent. I think Greg and Jeff. AAJ article somewhere. 205.154.192.198 (talk) 23:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summer bias
Talk:SS Führungshauptamt

message: Amt is the name for a government department (e.g. Finanzamt). Führung does mean leadership, but can also mean command (in the sense of military leadership - an order from a superior is a Befehl) which is the obvious translation in this context.
So I think the equivalent English would be SS Central Command. If one wants to remain true to the German wording, you could say "Main Department of SS Command" but as a German speaker I simply see this as a clumsier wording and a pointless exercise, because it's no closer to the original in meaning.
78.53.231.165 (talk) 23:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: Suggesting a move to SS Leadership Main Office, as this appears to be the common name in the English-language literature. Please let me know of any feedback.  K.e.coffman (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Talk:Chief Justice of Pakistan

message: April 3, 2009
Removing the names of Justice Javed Iqbal and Justice Rana Bhagwandas from Chief Justice list as they were only acting Chief Justices and actual justice remained Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. In absence of Chief Justice in the country, acting chief justice are always appointed.
See Observation of Justice Javed Iqbal on March 13, 2007 at http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=6495
"Acting Chief Justice Javed Iqbal on Tuesday said that Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry is still the Chief Justice of Pakistan while he has a temporary charge.
He made the observation when Muhammad Ikram Chaudhry advocate informed the acting chief justice about the treatment being meted out to Justice Chaudhry following the filing of the presidential reference against him."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rizvisa1 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Justice Javed Iqbal and Justice Rana Bhagwandas from Chief Justice list

message: The current Chief Justice was renamed to DOG-ar instead of Dogar. I mean, seriously, who are we? 10 year olds? Grow up for gods sake.
What is 58-2b?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.181.102.46 (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting a bit mature? 

message: Why are you (to those) removing the current Chief Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar? Why are you hiding the reality just because your personal view is different? Grow up and stop acting immature.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fahadzkhan (talk • contribs) 05:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Abdul Hameed Dogar 

message: Majority of the citizen of Pakistan are agreed that the real chief justice of Pakistan is Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhary and Dogar has no constitutional right to declared him the chief justice of Pakistan because the on 3rd November 2007 evening all the judges are directed to not to take oath under PCO thats why all the judges who took oath after that have no constitutional, moral or legal autharity  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.59.66.147 (talk) 09:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia needs reference against your claim, and the best applicable reference in this case is the official site of Supreme Court of Pakistan, which states that Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar is the Chief Justice of Pakistan. --SMS  Talk 16:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Chief Justice of Pakistan 

message: Sir we are faceing a problem that we appeared in the final exame of B.A. but we all are asked to reappear in the respective papers. We got the information that our papers were not dispatched by the courier service thats why we are asked to reappear. Sir, please consider our case favourably and order to send us new result considering our papers as we are desirous to get admission in the next coming semester / degree.
thanks in anticipation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.154.245 (talk) 09:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AIOU Nagligency in Pakpattan
Talk:Nalyvaiko Uprising

message: There is significant useful content at this userpage; the author told me he may not have time to work on it in the near future, and we can merge it here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded this article from the above sandbox, but there is still a wealth of links and content to be translated from Polish there. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Halibutt/Naliwajko]]
Talk:S. Rajeswara Rao

message: @Kailash29792 The page name should be Saluri Rajeswara Rao. He is variously credited in movies as "Saluri Rajeswara Rao", "S. Rajeswara Rao" or plainly as "Saluri". Since there can be many Rajeswara Raos, having the full form is the most apt title. Also, in many media programs, he is often referred to as just Saluri. So not having his surname in the page title would not be proper. Of the three options that we have, I think "Saluri Rajeswara Rao" is the best to identify the right person by the users.  Reo kwon (talk) 15:50, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Best to open an RM. Follow this procedure. Kailash29792 (talk)  15:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Name
Talk:Cem (Alevism)

message: Hi Thhings6sz , I don't believe that the Gürdal Aksoy source is reliable , he is trying to present his own disputed opinions as if it was a fact , he calls the Alevi pir a " a Zoroastrian Zaoter" while in reality the Alevi Pir is just like Sufi Pir , even both share the same etymologyAleviQizilbash (talk) 04:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Gürdal Aksoy

message: Two items need to be worked on in the article: 
# There is a great deal of unsourced material material that either needs citations added or removed per WP:BURDEN. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed at any time by any editor. 
# There is a significant amount of POV WP:OR in the article that needs to be cleaned up or rewritten once the unsourced material is removed and what remains is evaled by existing sources. 
* Sources added need to be independent reliable sources for the subject with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.
 // Timothy :: talk  16:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup
Talk:Bikrama Singh

message: I think there is no doubt about the contribution of Bikrama Singh. Practically every single book upon the history of the Sikhs and Nineteenth Century Punjab acknowledges his role.Vishvjitsingh 07:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 22:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:KaNgwane

message: One sentence here is marked for clarification: "An attempt to transfer parts of the homeland, along with parts of the Zulu homeland KwaZulu, to the neighbouring country of Swaziland in 1982 failed following protests.[clarification needed]". My father, who had first hand information about this at the time, have told me about this, but I don't remember the details. I think it had to do with people living there did not want this arrondation, not because they did not want to live in Swaziland but because they felt it would be to accept the bantustan system. I'll look for some source. Charlie Z. Smuts (talk) 11:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  It would have meant that it would have become more difficult for them to work in South Africa. --105.4.7.52 (talk) 19:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Banaba

message: Especially for the time of Japanese occupation:
* Raobeia Ken Sigrah, Stacey M. King: Te rii ni Banaba. Institute of Pacific Studies, University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji 2001,  (Bibliografie S. 312-316). http://books.google.com/books?id=CKIr1eg77IwC
* Unsere Opfer zählen nicht: die Dritte Welt im Zweiten Weltkrieg. - Berlin : Rhein. Journalistinnenbüro, 2005. -  (R.J.B.)
--Pjacobi (talk) 11:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources 

message: The row for 2015 in the table looks wrong, as the value 166 spans two rows. It is not likely that 166 was the population of Tabewa as well as Umwa in 2015, as Tabewa's population has otherwise not even reached 60 at any census. Could somebody could find data proving or disproving the column? User:CrunchyVersusTheRabbit (talk) 22:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the 2015 row in the population table correct?
Talk:Hiroshi Aoyama

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.228.221 (talk) 11:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In Japanese, yes, but he is involved in a worldwide sport whose lingua franca is English, so most media references to him worldwide use the English name order (forename + family name), which in accordence with Wikipedia:COMMONNAME is used in this English language Wikipedia. The same convention is used for all other Japanese motorcycle racing participants that I have encountered. {The poster formerly known as 87.981.230.195} 2.122.2.132 (talk) 04:27, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: His name's 青山 博 [Aoyama Hiroshi].
Talk:Brunswick Wharf Power Station

message: Brunswick Wharf Power Station was never known as Blackwall Point. Blackwall Point was a totally diferent station located on the south side of the River Thames, the site is now occupied by the Dome of Discovery. User:Tom sheriff 16 February 2011 (originally posted in ariticle, moved by nancy 08:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right - we have an article at Blackwall Point Power Station - any contributions would be welcome. This article actually says 'also known as Blackwall Power Station.  Pterre (talk) 09:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment moved from article