Talk:Hauraki Gulf

message: Can you please give me the meaning of the name "Hauraki". Thank you.
Cheers,
Chad Thompson
:Done. Cheers MadMaxDog 22:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hauraki Gulf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151121192608/http://www.linz.govt.nz/regulatory/place-names/recent-place-name-decisions-and-place-names-interest/nzgb-decisions-september to http://www.linz.govt.nz/regulatory/place-names/recent-place-name-decisions-and-place-names-interest/nzgb-decisions-september
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Port Pegasus / Pikihatiti which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 02:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Normally I'd close these obviously perpetually deadlocked NZ place name RMs as no-consensus, but the most recent stable title just happens to be the proposed title. That last RM that recommended the dual name happened way too close to the fateful RFC to call its result stable. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana →  – Per WP:NATURALNESS and WP:CONCISE.
#Google news shows 249 results in the past year for Hauraki Gulf, compared to 83 for Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana
#Google scholar shows 413 results since 2021 for Hauraki Gulf, compared to 22 results for Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana
#Ngrams shows significant use of Hauraki Gulf, but minimal use of Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana.
In addition, WP:RECOGNIZABILITY may apply. Since the move in September of last year, pageviews per month for this article abruptly fell from a long term average of 1500 to 1100, suggesting that readers are struggling to find it at its current title. BilledMammal (talk) 02:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Poketama that discussion was closed citing WP:NCNZ, which recommended using the dual name if any sources could be found that use the dual name. That guideline no longer supports dual names when they aren’t the common name, which is why this is being reconsidered. If the dual name is confusing that’s secondary by far to the fact that the shorter name is clearly the common name. — HTGS (talk) 01:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 May 2022