Talk:Jack Marsh

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 28, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: pass
:2. Factually accurate?: pass
:3. Broad in coverage?: pass
:4. Neutral point of view?: pass
:5. Article stability? pass
:6. Images?: pass
This is a comprehensive, well written article.  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.</div>— Mattinbgn\talk 05:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination

message: "Yulgilbar" redirects to Baryulgil, New South Wales, and that article makes no mention of any alternative name for the town. Colonies Chris (talk) 22:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yulgilbar or Baryulgil? 

message: This article has some vague and sweeping assertions that need, in my opinion, some clarification.
"Marsh's lack of opportunities has often been attributed to racial discrimination."
"The most popular of these theories was that Marsh was scapegoated in a campaign against throwing and was a soft target because of his race."
As it's today's featured article, and as I am unsure whether Weasel, By whom?, or Citation required is the appropriate annotation, I have simply added this comment to Talk. 122.106.178.25 (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A ridicolous article. If it is: "It is claimed that 40% of sexual assaults in Italy are carried out by immigrants", (or, ahah, what..? Like, 80% in Sweden?), or a similar politically sensitive matter is mentioned, every source is treated as weasel words, and we witness the perfection and tempestivity of the politically correct Wikipedia censure. Here we have a whole FEATURED article about a fucking Aborigen drunkard who supposedly didn't access higher leagues because he was not white. I think every real comment on the matter is superflous --151.47.205.251 (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an insane comment, this was a period of extreme racism in Australia. Of course he was severely discriminated against.--Grahame (talk) 00:34, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I still see no sources for your claims, Grahame, beside your own opinion. How can you just expect a random person says "That was a period of terrible racism in Australia", and that is treated as a reliable source of information? Really? --82.49.79.119 (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations required? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jack Marsh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160809071521/http://www.sydneycricketground.com.au/history/jack-marsh/ to https://www.sydneycricketground.com.au/history/jack-marsh/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified