lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crufts

message: Maybe the page needs clarification for non-specialists. Mostly in the area of the class names. --DomCleal 21:35, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it needs deletion. It's nn dogcruft. --SPUI (talk) 03:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

text: "Original author" consists of about 15 people so far who have added info from a variety of sources. Anyone who has the time & resources to expand parts of the article is encouraged to do so, even if only a sentence here or paragraph there! :-)   Elf | Talk 22:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify

message: I came here to disagree with the link to PDE at the bottom refering to it as "45-minute TV programme about Crufts 2009": it was about dog breeding in general, not Crufts in particular. But on following the link I would like to point out that it actually goes somewhere completely different and irrelevant. Can someone a) please change the wording and b) please fix the link?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.177.231 (talk) 09:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pedigree Dogs Exposed Link 

message: PeTA are a terrorist organisation and why are they being used on this page. They are not a reliable critic, and there are far better criticisms which can and have been sourced and have been sourced form the main article the terrorists do not even appear on the main article so why are they being used as the only organisation here. I smell a POV bias towards this terrorist organisation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.194.221.232 (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are a terrorist mouthpiece being used on this article
Talk:Duality of categories

message: This page should redirect to equivalence of categories, an article which explicitly uses the title of this page (which dual (category theory) does not). It might be good to cross link both articles to avoid confusion of "duality of categories" and "duality in category theory". 
Most importantly, note that all articles currently linking to this page really mean an equivalence. --Markus Krötzsch 22:21, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Ostwind

message: Why call it "Ostwind (tank)" instead of just "Ostwind"?  I think this is the primary Ostwind english readers would look up.  
I also removed the note of discrepency.  Considering that it's only off by one, and therefore more accurate then pretty much every other figure we have, I don't think it's really all that relevant.  Oberiko 22:35, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objections to just calling it "Ostwind"...and the difference of one tank is indeed small enogh to let it slip by :p Ferkelparade 13:34, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Level set

message: How about a graphic representation? It's key to economic theory.
I will do it myself if I think of it again after finals.
128.193.8.98 (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Graphic

message: The current article contains no didactic content whereas the July 2011 one did, plus it had an awesome picture. A sign of how bad the current page is, is that I direct my students to the July 2011 page. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Level_set&oldid=441776585. I guess it finally annoyed me enough to tell you about it. I don't want to step on anyone's toes so I'm not going to make changes. But seriously, change it back, or make an effort to improve the content of this page. 139.80.48.109 (talk) 03:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The July 2011 version was superior

message: In Johannes Jahn's "Introduction to the Theory of Nonlinear Optimization" it's
* (X, norm) a real normed space; S a nonempty subset of X; f: S \to |R a functional
* Epigraph E(f) = { (x, a) \in S \times |R | f(x) <= a }
* level set for a \in |R: S_a = { x \in S | f(x) <= a }
Looks like Jahn's level set is what's called "sublevel set" in this article. So maybe it should be mentioned that there are other definitions. -Quark8967 (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other definition? 

message: Should this be linked with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_(mathematics)#Inverse_image?
160.39.247.132 (talk) 14:45, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't this just the preimage?
Talk:Mos maiorum

message: I disagree. I just think it's a lazy stub which is worth having a page for someday. Doops 22:38, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justification for stub 

message: This article is a mess and wants taking in hand. Examples:
* What does "conscientiousness precision of conduct" mean? - is there a comma missing?
* How come the "six cornerstones" are eight in number?
* How come Parsimonia is uniquely capitalised? (minor point) 
* Reviewing the history of this page, it is apparent that there has been squabbling over what should and should not be in the list. The way to resolve this is to justify all inclusions with citations/references. 
AWhiteC 07:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I don't know Latin, but... is parsimonia really best translated as "stinginess"? That's an inherently negative word. Perhaps "frugality" would be a better translation? Narsil 00:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That depends... "frugal", contrary to popular misconception, means neither "cheap" nor "to use very little" but rather "to make the most of". A person who takes a roasted Thanksgiving turkey and makes several meals out of it (Thanksgiving feast, turkey sandwiches, leftover stuffing, soup from the bones, etc) is being frugal, even if the turkey was an expensive gourmet bird. So, would "frugality" really be the best translation of "parsimonia"? 66.102.198.31 (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complaints 

message: Is there an ancient source? Who made this list? - Christopher 15:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  where does this list come from? 

message: I mean dignitas... in that unsourceable list. :) --- Pichote (talk) 17:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  You forgot Poland! 

message: In the section named "Pietas" the following caught my eye:
:For example, Julius Caesar displayed pietas during his life by beginning in 42 BCE and dedicating in 48 BCE, after the battle of Pharsalus, a temple to Venus Genetrix.
Since BCE years count backwards this made no sense. I found the following in the Stambaugh reference on page 119 via Google Books:
:The Forum Iulium ... Begun by Julius Caesar in 54 BC and dedicated in 46 BC, its architectural focus was the Temple of Venus Genetrix ...
Looks like some fact checking may be in order. Is this a simple case of swapped dates or are the dates really way off? If the Forum was dedicated in 46 BCE then when was the Temple itself dedicated? 66.102.198.31 (talk) 14:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Pietas 

message: There really should be an article about this on the Latin Wikipedia. Anyone else agree? 83.226.206.82 (talk) 16:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin version
Talk:Loaded language

message: ... just what I needed for something I'm writing. 2600:8801:BE01:7C00:8E2D:DAEA:B00E:D545 (talk) 02:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for this article.  

message: Hi why are you sad 47.232.232.78 (talk) 02:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this was like 8-9 months ago, and this is not necessarily the place for it, but I hope you're doing alright; hope you aren't as sad and things are going better.  And even if you are still sad, just remember that you are strong and you can make it out of these times someday (even if you don't think you are/can).  I believe in you! Dantes44 (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe 

message: the reference to orwell's discussion of the term "fascism" in 1946 very much reads out of place considering the more modern discussions of the term. yeah, he's notable, yeah he's talking about loaded language, but he's talking about *literal fascism* *one year* after the takedown of fascist axis powers.
what im trying to say is that his quote being used *in the context of this article* feels to me very out of place in how the article flows and even with how the article describes loaded language. the article is describing "words that have emotional impact beyond their literal meaning" not "words that are only used for their emotional impact and mean nothing else" and feels crass and out of place here. 2600:6C47:A03F:C443:1409:5DA3:7A24:A0C4 (talk) 10:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  orwell
Talk:George Wright

message: George Wright the Theatre Organist is not listed.  He was a big influence when HI Fidelity came in.  His organ records were used to demonstrate the highs and the lows of systems.  He recorded on Hi Fi records.  He is considered as being the best theatre organist in the world.  He died a few years ago.
--OK, just added him to the disambiguation page, but have not added an article yet. Jim 02:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Organist
Talk:King of Skiffle

message: Original content:
"Now one day whilst in a hurry, He missed a lady's bin: He hadn't gone but a few yards When she chased after him. "What game do you think you're playing?" She cried right from the 'eart, "You've missed me, am I too late?" "No, jump up on the cart!"
Oi! My old man's a dustman, He wears a dustman's hat, He wears cor-blimey trousers And he lives in a council flat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niteowlneils (talk • contribs) 13 May 2004
::Removed most of this to avoid copyright violation issues. Lawikitejana 02:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Why does My Old Man's a Dustman redirect here? Is it an alternative title? Rmhermen 20:35, May 13, 2004 (UTC)
:I expect it's because this is the album on which it appears (and possibly the one on which it first appeared). --Lawikitejana 02:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Song title redirect

message: The link to My Old Man's a Dustman appears to be broken. Can someone fix? 91.84.13.71 20:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Link

message: Lonnie Donegan's cd album from 1999.
Does anyone know of a LP version of this?
Dave Waller
Dave Waller:
I have a German double album of same name, released 1970.
It has three more tracks than the CD.
PhilR  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phlopp (talk • contribs) 13:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mule Skinner Blues
Talk:Mount Dana

message: def. not the 18th highest in cali.  Aggesiz (sp) in the palisades i know is the 20th highest in CA at well over 13800.  there are 13 14ers in CA and numerous peaks in the very high 13000s.
Um, ropes?  Having climbed both Dana and Lyell, I can assert that neither require ropes, though crampons and an axe on Lyell may be useful.  So while Dana doesn't require ropes, it's not unique in this aspect, and Lyell is the higher peak.
Mt. Lyell does not require ropes. We've climbed it with just an ice axe. Asserting that Mt. Dana is the highest in Yosemite that does not require ropes is incorrect.
:Agree hike395 04:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a citation for name origin, feel free to verify hike395 04:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Temperatures can drop very quickly, with hot 100 °F (38 °C) weather dropping to freezing levels during a hailstorm.  
Please do not return this information to the article without a citation to support it.--BirgitteSB 22:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested info moved to talk 

message: I removed Josiah Whitney's name which was listed as one of the first to climb Dana. Roper says just Brewer and Hoffmann. Farquhar reports "Whitney spoke of it as an easy trip for tourists. (Whitney Survey: Geology, 1865, p. 435.)." I guess the most that can be said is that Brewer and Hoffmann made the first recorded ascent. --droll [chat] 02:14, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Ascent
Talk:Mount Thielsen

message: I'm not a geologist but it seems to me that the statement that "Thielsen was produced by subduction of the  under the North American Plate" conflicts with the statement below that says "The Cascade Range was produced by convergence of the North American Plate with the subducting ." Isn't the Nazca Plate a bit further south.  –droll [chat] 08:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right -- it's the Juan de Fuca plate. —hike395 (talk) 08:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, that was a confusion on my part. Blame my frazzled brain. ceranthor 20:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction? 

message: As a southern Oregon native, I have never heard Thielsen pronounced TEAL-sun. There's always a "th" sound at the beginning. I'm thinking the source isn't very reliable because I haven't ever heard Willamette pronounced will-A-mut or Oregon pronounced OARY-gun, either. Thoughts? LittleMountain5 23:39, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a native but I've lived in the state for about 20 years. I agree with you. –droll [chat] 23:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the incorrect pronunciation and the source. LittleMountain5 23:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation?
Talk:Farnsworth Paradox

message: Farnsworth Paradox - all google hits that I get are about Futurama. Does the paradox only exist on the TV show? Or is it also related to Philo Farnsworth who is a real person?
: I'd expect this site to provide a "cultural reference" (foot of page) if there was a real world Farnsworth paradox, and on this basis, think it safe to say it is a Futurama invention. --Tagishsimon
: As far as I can tell it relates only to an episode of "Futurama". I modified the article to reflect that. If it's important in the tv show it should be linked from there. Currently its and orphan other than the link here. Vfd candidate?-- Infrogmation 18:49, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As a Futurama fan, I'd consider this article a candidate for deletion. It isn't even spelled right - the episode title is "The Farnsworth Parabox" not -dox. And there is no specific mention of a "paradox" within the episode dialogue. dmmaus 07:42, 9 May 2004 (UTC)

text: It's not even accurate - the box in the show contains another universe, not the same one. The specifics are covered well enough in the episode guide, so I've redirected it to there. sjorford 09:59, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Cleanup]] debate, 7 May 2004
Talk:Hugh Segal

message: Any ideas as to honorary appointments? Quadra 05:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Query

message: Should we consider a listing of books authored by Segal? Codydamon (talk) 19:06, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Publications

message: I took a better photo and released it under a Creative Commons license, but when I added it to this post it was removed by another user. See discussion at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Peripitus#Photo_of_Hugh_Segal
May I please put my photo back in this article? The one here now seems specially chosen to make the subject look bad.
Ilnyckyj (talk) 19:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems others have already explained to you that the policy is to disallow non-free images when a free alternative is readily available. Short of trying to change the Wikipedia-wide policy, I don't know that there is anything else you can do short of licensing your photo under a free licence (e.g, CC-BY-SA). Graham (talk) 21:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Very bad photo
Talk:Think tank

message: Something about sources of funding for think tanks would also be a useful addition.  For example, comparing think tanks with clear sources of funding and those with opaque sources.  Transparency campaigners consider that think tank funding sources could be clearerUK thinktanks urged to be transparent about funding as $1m US donations revealed (The Guardian).  Are there reliable sources which report which think tanks have clear sources of funding and which are opaque?  I'm fairly sure there are organisations which specialise in identifying funding sources which are unclear in relation to lobbying about public policy.  Philh-591 (talk) 21:57, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pied_Piper_of_Hamelin#Allusions_in_linguistics|He who pays the piper calls the tune]]
Talk:Professional degree (version 2)

message: Hmmm.  This article is very much from the Swedish perspective.  Things called "professional degrees" exist elsewhere, although the meaning may not be quite the same. Isomorphic 04:17, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Lets write both meanings. "Professional degree" is a term used by Swedish goverment in the European Parlament // Rogper 20:02, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various meanings 

message: A proposal to merge with Academic degree was made in August 2006. No comments at all were received. I've removed the tag and not moved forward with the proposal. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 23:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: reading this article I would not merge it with Academic Degree for the simple reason that you would have to find a name for academic degrees which are not professional degrees. Otherwise it would be very difficult to distinguish between the two...--VeronikaMM 08:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to merge with [[Academic degree]]

message: FYI: I believe Professional studies is a more generic term than Professional degree, and therefore they should not be merged. But we should duplicate as little information as possible, so please feel free to trim or cannibalize that article as you see fit. Vagary 01:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to NOT merge with [[Professional studies]]

message: A professional degree is different from an academic degree.  The curriculum and purposes are completely different.  One could also call a professional degree a practical study and an academic degree a theoretical or philosophical study.  Isn't it so? Zoticogrillo (talk) 07:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  professional vs. academic degree
Talk:Mount Pulag

message: if the dwarf bamboo is endemic to mount pulag, why is it named in latin after mount niitaka on taiwan?Toyokuni3 (talk) 21:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dwarf Bamboo

message: In April 2009, Gubernatoria demoted Pulag from second highest to third highest in the Philippines.  Even now, another part of the article calls it second highest.  If Pulag is third highest, could anyone name the second highest mountain in the Philippines?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Painterjf (talk • contribs) 04:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second or third highest? 

message: It doesn't snow in Mt.Pulag, only hailstorms that look like snow, and frosts.
Seriously, where's the source?- Aja675 (talk) 15:27, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has it ever really snowed there? 

message: Is the redirect from Mount Pulog to this side really correct? A friend from the Philippines told me that the  Mount Pulog is in SO of Luzon and another Mounten of Luzon. See here: Position of really Mount Pulog on Google Maps Drägü (talk) 08:53, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Some older maps erroneously used "Mount Pulog" to refer to Mount Pulag (for example, as shown in Fast Facts about Philippine Provinces by Conrado M. Lancion). The "Mount Pulog" in Sorsogon is quite an unknown mountain. —Sanglahi86 (talk) 11:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Mount Pulag really the same as [[Mount Pulog]] 

message: wiktionary:pulag. Jidanni (talk) 07:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add etymology
Talk:Philosophy of time

message: ----
Removed text:
The Reverse Time Theory is derived from Amazon Resident Dr. Neil Grant. Do not bother validating this article, for whoever writes anything about this will die within seven days (i dont wanna die!!) and their publication gets deleted by a mystical force!!! 
Actual Theory
Here is the actual theory:
What if fate exists, but time has reversed itself and is flowing backwards? What we perceive is not necessarily accurate, yet in backwards time motion, that means what we perceive is actually the opposite of what is occuring. I shall now leave you to ponder this...
- The only, the infamous Soilguy
and replaced by minimal stub. Andrewa 04:41, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Anglican Province of Christ the King

message: Is this province in communion with any other provinces in the Anglican Communion? (I don't think so but won't say it in the article until I have confirmed.) <>< tbc
No, it's not.  As of late, however, it is in communion with the other two surviving "Chambers succession" jurisdictions, the Anglican Catholic Church and the United Episcopal Church in North America.  Frweber (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Union

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Anglican Province of Christ the King have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate
Talk:Cy Endfield

message: CE was also a gifted silversmith. He created a famous silver and silver gilt chess set chosen by the international chess governing body, the FIDE, to commemorate the 1972 Fischer-Spassky world championship in Reykjavik. For reference see: "Master Pieces" by Gareth Williams 2000.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.207.183 (talk) 23:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Silversmith

message: This is only a tenative beginning of course, barely more than a stub. Hopefully a real Endfield scholar will be able to add some meat to this, I've just made a rough outline based on what I know, and intend to add a bit more later. --Chips Critic 05:01, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Deianira

message: Er..."according to Robert Graves"...modern authors are not sources on Greek mythology.  Graves's mythology very carefully footnotes the sources for all his different versions of the stories.  We can do better than that. john 05:33, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Well, yup, this IPA is cited (albeit it to an offline source), so good job there. That said, especially with a lead as overloaded and messy as this one is, it should be omitted and moved to a Wiktionary entry or moved into some infobox in the manner of . Similarly, isn't Greek phonetic enough that its IPA can be omitted? — LlywelynII 09:04, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Lewis and Clark Expedition

message: reading boocks abut lewist and clark then we have a test. 2600:1700:5720:2190:BA5B:B876:A3F8:3C61 (talk) 15:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  reading 

message: Remove the section stating that this expedition was an exercise in white supremacy. 2601:6C0:C286:400:8DB9:C915:5768:C36 (talk) 23:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done SLAY for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Pinchme123 (talk) 04:10, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2023 

message: The U.S. Army Friends of Civil Affairs organization views the Corps of Discovery as a precursor to the Civil Affairs branch and the regimental award medallions bear the name Lewis and Clark. The Corps of Discovery, while not officially a Civil Affairs operation, conducted what is now referred to as Civil Reconnaissance and Civil Engagement during the westward expansion.
Reference: https://friendsofcivilaffairs.com/lewis-clark-nomination Wphurt86 (talk) 22:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy and Honors (addition to section)  

message: The first paragraph was named 'Overview'. I changed that to 'Motivations' because that fits the paragraph way better with what it is. However, the lead section introduces the motives too, and the 'Motivations' paragraph then states almost the same thing as the lead did. I believe the 'Motivations' paragraph is still necessary, but needs a rehaul since it stands useless right now.
Qwaabza (talk) 16:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usefulness of first paragraph ('Motivations')