Talk:Starfire (Teen Titans)

message: I just looked at the article for that game, and Starfire has not been confirmed for it (yet).  Anyone else think this is worth mentioning? 71.67.106.129 (talk) 21:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: DC Universe Online

message: : Pardon me, but you're completely wrong. Starfire was lover for several years to Dick Grayson, as Robin and as Nightwing. They were even engaged to marry, but the ceremony was interrupted by evil Raven. As far as I know, and unless it happened in the new Titans issues I haven't read yet, Starfire has never been lover to Tim Drake, not to mention she's several years older than him. For more information see Titans Tower: Starfire and Titans Tower: Nightwing-- Andromeda 09:52, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Starfire loves Dick

message: *Anyone else think the section of Starfire 'isms' is pretty unencyclopedic? --InShaneee 16:24, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Starfireisms

message: Didn't starfire die in infinite crissis number six? I thought she did, why isn't it mentioned on the article? - 68.89.222.215 20:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status

message: I've glanced at this entry several times and though passages that were next to the Koriand'r SHB were about her. Can we please switch the characters, with the more wll-known version on top? --Chris Griswold 02:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character confusion 

message: Original sentence : As with the other characters in Teen Titans, it was decided to render a younger, more child-like version of Starfire for the animated series version.
Edited : As with the other characters in Teen Titans, it was decided to render a younger, more teenager-like version of Starfire for the animated series version.
Kinda minor, but I felt it needed to be done since it was Teen Titans and they weren't children but teenagers. --Takuyar 02:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Edit 

message: 'Starfire's top and skirt in the animated series seem more appropriate than her comic-book incarnation's risque outfit.' In what way is this NPOV? It sounds very judgmental of her costume and also uses weasel words.Jupiterzguy
:I agree, and some of this article reads a lot like crufty fan service. --Basique 18:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: OK, I've returned the article to its previous status quo to emphasize Koriand'r's position as the most notable Starfire; given how the Red Star section links almost immediately straight to his own article, and the second Starfire seems to be essentially non-notable, there's no good reason to "restructure" the article to move the information that people would actually be looking for down the page.  Anyone have any thoughts?  Rdfox 76 02:59, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article structure 

message: There was a villainess, "Starfire" in the Supergirl issues of Adventure Comics (CBDB.com  says #404-407).  She was being set-up to be Supergirl's archnemesis, when Adventure was cancelled.  Should she be included here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.165.188.30 (talk) 18:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Starfire

message: :Image:Starfrie3.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Starfrie3.png

message: :Image:52twenty.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:52twenty.jpg

message: :Image:Korykidnapped.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Korykidnapped.png

message: :Image:TITANS 17.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TITANS 17.jpg

message: I keep removing info which has little and less to do with Starfire and more with her team's adventures. The article is not an exhaustive discussion of every little jaunt she has made; it is an concise description of matters. Brevity is key. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 05:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spare memories and other non-consequential info 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Starfire (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070930041311/http://www.dccomics.com/heroes_and_villains/?hv=origin_stories/starfire to http://www.dccomics.com/heroes_and_villains/?hv=origin_stories/starfire
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
 –   What's in your palette? Paine  17:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I feel that the recent change to Starfire's article is a bit one-dimensional. Starfire has been on at least three other teams aside from the Teen Titans, she's not only identified with them. It's like titling Beast Boy's page "Beast Boy (Doom Patrol)". It really only embodies one portion of that character's history. Why can't you guys just title it "Starfire (DC Comics)" like you do with nearly every DC character.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by UltimateTitan6 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the other Starfire is also from DC Comics. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Title 

message: I just axed three links from the External Link list, because they were all to a website that apparently reorganized, so these links just ended up on the front page. If someone with more time at the moment wants to go through this site and find the appropriate Starfire pages, that might not be a bad idea. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: The section on Teen Titans Go! states, "Starfire does not reciprocate Robin's romantic feelings towards her. Rather, she sees him as a brother figure or friend; however, in 'Mouth Hole' and 'The Return of Slade' it is predicted that they kissed." There is something wrong with the latter sentence, but not having seen the show, I don't know exactly what. Predicting a past event doesn't make sense. Maybe that should say, "it is implied that they kissed" or "it is suggested that they kissed" or "it is predicted that they will kiss in the future" or "they become time travelers, and somebody predicts that they will go into the past and kiss then". --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:08, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predicting the past? 

message: I removed the links at the bottom of the page categorizing Starfire under:
"DC Comics LGBT superheroes"
"Fictional pansexuals"
"Fictional polyamorous people".
I searched on these. There is no official statement on Starfire being pansexual from DC Comics either by anyone who worked on her or in any comic book issues. She is not categorized as LGBT on the DC Wiki. The only thing out there that touches on the subject is a speculation piece on the SYFY website. Before these categories get re-inserted, I think it is only fair that it be mentioned in the body of the page with citing from a credible source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrm0220 (talk • contribs) 04:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are going to remove those, you need consensus to do, and I oppose your removal 100%.Historyday01 (talk) 14:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Historyday01, what are the sources supporting the categorization? Dimadick (talk) 16:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Once again (of many) I just removed Starfire's incorrect characterization as pansexual and polyamorous. The part of the speculative text mentioning this is still there, as I couldn't think of a way to rewrite it. She has never been shown to be pansexual or polyamorous in the DC Universe in any official source, even though this may be common in her culture. Likewise, lesbianism is common among DC Amazons, but many of them are not lesbians. --2804:2FB0:41E:AF00:C859:11BD:25BC:4468 (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

text: They keep insisting on putting the labels "LGBT", "pansexual" and "polyamorous" here, and I'm constantly reversing it, and telling them to read this Talk page. --2804:2FB0:476:4500:156E:4AB:151A:E6F6 (talk) 19:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect categorizations 

message: Can we get a new photo for Starfire? Countryking2001 (talk) 01:52, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Starfire is not pansexual/LGBT. This is a fan headcanon, it's not canonical. Why do you keep insisting on it? --168.228.86.160 (talk) 22:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Pansexual/LGBT?

message: Starfire (Teen Titans) → Starfire (Koriand'r)   Marveldccomicsfan (talk) 23:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move December 8, 2021 

message: Why is the name of this page "Starfire (Teen Titans)", It makes it seem like she exclusively a Teen titans charecter would not be more appropriate to say Starfire (Dc Comics) or Starfire (Koriand'r) WrenSparks (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Name 

message: Can she please get a new main image Cordelia Van Allen (talk) 23:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Image