Talk:MGM-52 Lance

message: The GlobalSecurity link was removed as its content is not original.  GlobalSecurity has simply copy-and-pasted content from the Redstone Arsenal onto its own site without acknowledging the source.  This is referred to as plagiarism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.131.8.131 (talk) 04:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Understandable but there should be a replacement link or reference. Here is the global security link: https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/fotl.htm 2A04:EE41:3:12EA:ED9E:8301:D422:7E47 (talk) 04:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please add this article to reference 7 2A04:EE41:3:12EA:ED9E:8301:D422:7E47 (talk) 04:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I deleted the passage about US formidable SRBM force. You see, there was only one force to compare to back then, and that is USSR's SRBM force. And compared to it, USA's SRBM force was in no way formidable. USSR had far more missiles, USSR's missiles had longer range, larger warheads.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.50.118 (talk) 01:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually you're forgetting the French Pluton missile. Of course the numbers are not in the same league. Aesma (talk) 02:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  formidable SRBM force? 

message: According to Designation Systems, the MGM-52 Lance was powered by a pair of liquid propellant rockets. Orihara (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And there's an interesting story here... The MGM-5 Corporal was the US Army's first tactical nuclear missile, and its main operational problem was its liquid fuel; Other problems were encountered early in its development and deployment but were able to be addressed, but not that one. So its replacement the MGM-29 Sergeant was solid fueled, but was in its turn replaced by the liquid fueled MGM-52 Lance. The evolution of liquid fueled rockets which made this possible is a fascinating subject which we don't seem to cover yet. Andrewa (talk) 14:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  engine type 

message: Removed.  Content stolen from www.usarmygermany.com.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.135.198 (talk) 16:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: MGM-52 Lance (section) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on MGM-52 Lance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221234107/http://www.redstone.army.mil/history/lance/welcome.html to http://www.redstone.army.mil/history/lance/welcome.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on MGM-52 Lance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110910043644/http://www.brookings.edu/projects/archive/nucweapons/lance.aspx to http://www.brookings.edu/projects/archive/nucweapons/lance.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110910043644/http://www.brookings.edu/projects/archive/nucweapons/lance.aspx to http://www.brookings.edu/projects/archive/nucweapons/lance.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified