lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:National Cherry Festival

message: Currently the page reads:
In 2017, Michigan's Greta Van Fleet performed with Shinedown. In '12, Pop Evil from Muskegon performed. In '14 Uncle Kracker performed with Smash Mouth. In '14, Tommy James & the Shondells performed. In '01, Chicago's Styx performed. In '16, Chicago's Cheap Trick performed. In '17, REO Speedwagon performed.
I changed it by adding a performance section, since the focus of the festival is cherries not musical acts.  I didn't change or add any of the links.
Performers
2017:  Michigan's Greta Van Fleet with Shinedown, REO Speedwagon
2016:  Cheap Trick
2014:  Uncle Kracker with Smash Mouth, Tommy James & the Shondells
2012:  Pop Evil from Muskegon performed.
2001:  Styx 
My edit was reversed, but the problem of the selection being badly written is still present.  Not to mention that in a few years the way the years are presented might cause confusion since the festival will be 100 years old.
Suggestions for a better way to have the information presented would be appreciated.
ScrapperMegan (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  added performance section since it's ancillary information 
Talk:Steve Archer

message: The article asserts that he was a pioneer in the development of Jesus music but later list that he won the Grammy Award for Best Gospel Performance, Contemporary or Inspirational. How does Jesus music differ from Gospel music or Contemporary Christian music? This section may need a rewrite for clarification. Absolon S. Kent (talk) 19:47, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question regarding lead paragraph and link to [[Jesus music]]
Talk:Leon Katz (playwright)

message: I came across mention of this scholar in an article about Gertrude Stein, and apparently his research is considered the "holy grail" of Stein biographical research.  What's interesting though, is that apparently he's an elusive character and the notes themselves have not been shared with other scholars.  I wrote a stub article so that I could come back to it later.
:OK, I'll remove the speedy tag for now, but you need to flesh this out. Sources are a must; see WP:REF for details. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job! I "wikified" the article (added links to other Wikipedia articles) and made a minor change in the references. Thank you, and feel free to contribute more. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Epsilon Eridani b

message: "The planet's existence was suspected by a Canadian team led by Bruce Campbell and Gordon Walker in the early 1990s".
If so, why is it stated as an US discovery? US did only confirm what canadians discovered, sayis in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.31.180.126 (talk) 10:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. A suspicion is not a confirmed discovery, according to established scientific culture. A suspicion is barely notable at all, since it could as well have been in error. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 20:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't blame Canada

message: I propose that this planet be considered "confirmed". The only real challenge was Brogi's in 2009, on the basis of "physical impossibility" rather than "observationally". This challenge was met in 2010. Observationally I haven't seen an attack on the results in the way of, say, Baluev's debunking of GJ 581 d, f, g. If there is such an article, let's have it. --Zimriel (talk) 20:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: 84.73.25.195 (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

text: As a counter-example, I checked Janson et al (2015) and they still list it as a "candidate" planet. Asserting that this is confirmed seems like WP:OR. I think we should wait for the astronomy community to settle this more decisively, and until then treat it as unconfirmed. Praemonitus (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed or confirmed

message: Several people leading IAU naming committees have admitted that they don't know how to use Unicode, or that their typesetting software isn't equipped to handle anything but ASCII. They can't even deal with German eszett. That was still true in 2018, and is only starting to be addressed in 2019. The spelling "AEgir" is an obvious attempt to render "Ægir" in ASCII. (The naming committees don't accept camelcase, for example.) There's no need to slavishly follow IAU orthography when they themselves admit their incompetence. I don't mind copying their faulty orthography here, but a little common sense is called for.
If the article is moved, it should of course go to the intended name Ægir, not to the computer hack they used out of desperation. — kwami (talk) 02:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't the intended name Ægir for the moon (Aegir (moon)), which was named first ? Baleer (talk) 00:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

text: When the IAU puts it in writing that they wanted the name to be Ægir, better yet that the name actually is Ægir, then we can use it.  Until then, see WP:OR.  Lithopsian (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthography
Talk:XO-2Nb

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose.  Papers mentioning this planet (e.g. Bakos 2007, the discovery paper Burke 2007, Burrows 2007, Lopez-Morales 2007, Kane 2008, Burrows 2008, Fortney 2008, Johns-Krull 2008) use the designation XO-2b, with no space.  In addition, SIMBAD  uses XO-2b with no space.  The use by the Extrasolar Planets Enyclopaedia of a space is inconclusive since this source uniformly uses lower-case letters preceded by a space for planet designators even when, as in the case of PSR B1257+12, this is definitely wrong.  (According to this discussion, this is due to a software limitation.) Spacepotato (talk) 17:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This shouldn't affect how the majority of astronomers state.  Also, several discovery papers have the planet with no space (HD 209458 b was called "HD 209458b" in its discovery paper and still is called that in NASA and other news articles   ).  This space is not just used for planets, it is used for stars as well.  The space is commonly used for public references (not so much scientific reference). — NuclearVacuum 18:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the preferred designator for HD 209458 b in the astronomical literature appears to be HD 209458b, with no space, the HD 209458 b article should be moved to HD 209458b.  This appears to be preferred in popular references as well (37,000 v. 7,450 hits on Google.) Spacepotato (talk) 18:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not nessessary.  In the astronomical majority always leave a space between the system and the object (no matter what).  This is not about HD 209458 b (which I better not see be moved), this is about XO-2 b. — NuclearVacuum 19:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your statement that the majority of astronomers use a space is not correct.  A SIMBAD search found the papers above which used XO-2b, and I found no papers which used XO-2 b.  Likewise, a Google Scholar search shows a preponderance of papers using HD 209458b (777 hits) rather than HD 209458 b (156 hits.) Spacepotato (talk) 19:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

text: If there's no reason for adding the space, I would suggest not doing so. Spacepotato (talk) 19:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Placing a space between the system and the object is commonly used and should be exercised (no one says "51 Pegasib").  A space is used so there is no confusion between the system and the object name. — NuclearVacuum 19:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't any confusion in this case because the system's designation ends with a string of numbers rather than a word.  This is a difference between designators like 51 Pegasi and ε Eridani and designators like XO-2, WASP-1 and HD 209458. Spacepotato (talk) 20:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Rancho San Juan Cajón de Santa Ana

message: What is stated in this article is truth. The article is not completed. I ask anyone that asks to remove this article to check the sources that are posted. The sources can be found in the Santa Ana Public Library. {AVALOS714 17:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: * http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Rancho+San+Juan+Caj%F3n+de+Santa+Ana%22 - references available. Addhoc 17:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Search for references
Talk:Kennin

message: The sexigesimal name for the first year of Kennin was hanoto -tori,Brown, p. 340. which another way of identifying Shōji 2 (1201). --Ooperhoofd 17:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To be added later ?

message: At first, I could not understand the following sentence:
* Kennin 2, in the 1st month (1202): Nitsida-no Yoshishige, the emperor's second cook, died. His court rank had been of the second rank of the fith class.[3]
Now I found the descriptions here intended to express as follows:
*Nitsida-no Yoshishige: Nitta Yoshishige (新田義重)
*second cook: Oh'i-no-suke(大炊助)
*the second rank of the fith class:Ju-goi-no-ge(従五位下)
--Corruptresearcher 16:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nitsida-no Yoshishige
Talk:The National Engines

message: / GWR 4900 Class
I'm confused as to why this splendid steam train is being designated the inspiration for the "Prince of Wales"? His London costume design is well documented as being based on the Advanced Passanger Train.  Does this refer to his US productions costume design - I can't see any stylistic references in the costume design here.  Please explain?
http://www.bellesdomain.co.uk/stex/brochures/uk06_prince.jpg
Belle pullman 17:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince of Wales 

message: Sorry if "Hashimoto" is the correct japanese spelling of the word, but the character's name is "Hashamoto"!  Except when it's Nintendo.  Belle pullman (talk) 19:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hashimoto

message: Anybody have any clue as to his inspiration. Cause to me he doesn't appere to be based on any type of Loco ever made. At least not in russia. --Starlight Controller (talk) 19:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that's just silly!!! Out of interest, what ref pics are you using?   To me he seems a generic sturdy, function-before-form design with a snow plough?  Belle pullman (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Well, he's designated as the Trans Siberian Express...  but from what I've researched that's very much the route, not the engine.   Belle pullman (talk) 18:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Turnov

message: And what is the deal with espresso having the VIA Rail Canada logo anyway? --Starlight Controller (talk) 19:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a very good question.   Ask John Napier!  :)  Belle pullman (talk) 23:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Espresso

message: Okay we all know that Rhurgold is based on the ICE. but what about his earlier persona i'd really like to find out what he might be based on. Belle if you have a closeup of his helmet let me know. --Starlight Controller (talk) 19:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.bellesdomain.co.uk/ruhrgold.htm  Here's my page dedicated to him in his various incarnations...  The Weltschaft costume was also cast in bronze to form one of the two statues in the foyer of the German theatre...  there's gotta be clear photos around.  http://www.bellesdomain.co.uk/stex/meets/bochum03/fanday05.jpg  however this is the best I have, sorry!  Belle pullman (talk) 22:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rhurgold/Weltschaft

message: anyone have any photo's of the National Engines from this particuler show. --Starlight Controller (talk) 13:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Starlight on Ice
Talk:Daryl Coley

message: Hello, I am EpiphanyAF, and I am the creator of the Daryl Coley wiki. I am contesting the deletion of this page simply because I am the only person working on it.
So far, there has been no effort put forth in creating anything relating to this artist on Wikipedia, so I took up the task myself. The page is not meant to be as it is; it is a work in progress, and I feel that it is important to note that. The text I have written will be rewritten in a matter of days.
Sincerely,
EpiphanyAF 14:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daryl Coley Should not be deleted 
Talk:Lock Han Chng Jonathan v Goh Jessiline

message: This is a well-written and interesting article. Just a brief note to say that this article will probably need to be renamed when the case is officially reported in the Singapore Law Reports, as Lock v. Goh is not the official name of the case. Cheers, Jacklee 18:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming of article

message: You may want to take the following step to improve the article:
*Apply the  template to citations to newspaper articles.
I'll add to this list if I think of anything else. Cheers, Jacklee 13:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements to article
Talk:Alien Abduction: Incident in Lake County

message: Hey everyone. The Production section says (in an un-sourced statement) that the film takes place in Lake County, Montana, whereas an article from the Associated Press implies that it was Lake County, Minnesota. Does the film itself say anything about the state in which it's supposed to take place? I've got a copy, so I'll take a look. If nothing turns up, I am going to change "Montana" to "Minnesota". Regards. Braincricket (talk) 05:55, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: News flash. At around the 13 minute mark there is an interview with "Sheriff Kent Tilson" of Lake County, Montana. I guess that answers that. The quote from the AP is "A nationally televised show on UPN Tuesday claimed to have videotape of the McPherson family's alien abduction here [Minn.] a year ago ... " I guess they got it wrong and/or the people of Lake County, Minn. just got a little excited. Braincricket (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Lake County?
Talk:Plant evo devo

message: Hey...this page is an absolutely fresh birth on wikipedia, and still is largely incomplete...but there's lots to be put in this, and I am kinda compiling material from everywhere for this page....if you are interested in adding new content to this page or simply giving ideas, it would be great to have you at Wikipedia:WikiProject Plant Evo Devo. Join the group and the discussion there...!
Gauravm1312 17:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ken Bald

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.217.192.2 (talk) 01:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Chex

message: I guess I am not sure I understand why my link to my article Review of New Chocolate Chex Cereal from General Mills was removed & why it does not meet the guidelines. I ate the cereal, I liked it, I wrote a review. The article is not an ad, promotion or a way to get external links to increase my page rank it is an link to an article I wrote about a cereal that I ate and liked, it even has a bit of nutrition facts & I don't work for General Mills. Could some body please explain to me how & why it is not relevant?
Lacurcio 18:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  my link removed 

message: I was wondering why at least some of the information here is not included in the article on the Ralston-Purina Company? That article focuses mostly on the pet food business portion of RP and barely mentions the cereal/foods side of the company. Thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions
Talk:Rho Coronae Borealis

message: I propose that the article Rho Coronae Borealis b is merged into this one. The object has consistently been found by astrometric measurements to be a low-mass star in a nearly face-on orbit (see Reffert & Quirrenbach (2011)), and is in fact no longer listed in the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia as a confirmed planet . It therefore does not make sense to have an entire separate article dedicated to discussing this object as a planet, this misrepresents the current state of knowledge. As such I believe it should be merged into a section of this article: the Rho Coronae Borealis b article is not very long and the merge would not overwhelm this article, and it would make for a more consistent discussion about the nature of the companion. 77.57.25.250 (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and simply redirected the article here. Considering how outdated the article was, there wasn't even really anything useful to merge. StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 2014-09-06 

message: Abs. mag. is fainter than Sun, but luminosity is brighter (with comparable spectra).  Also, abs. mag. is fainter than actual magnitude, for a star >10 parsec away. 
- ¡Ouch! (hurt me / more pain) 20:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: For some reason this article has never been updated with the results of Fulton et al. 2016. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually updated it now SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 22:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs update
Talk:Cheney Brothers Historic District

message: For now, I added the image of the mills that's located on the Manchester, CT page.  It's better than no image at all, and it shows what the mills used to look like in their heyday.  I work in this town; I'll try to get down there soon to take a photo. Chrissypan (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Bernard Kleiman

message: The article looks a bit like an obit.  It is structurally similar to the NY Times obit, and also includes some paragraphs that are identical.  The article may have been copied from an  obit using the same sources as NY Times.  See Times article. -- Whpq 17:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copypaste

message: I removed unsourced material. Paul Feldman and Bruce A. Miller were not mentioned by the obituaries cited, and I didn't have time to track down the vague reference to the Wall Street Journal (Ignatius).  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsource material with spelling errors
Talk:The Spider's Web (serial)

message: Ram Singh was played by Kenneth Duncan, not Kenne Duncan. I have the serial on TV in front of me, so know this to be true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.249.249.157 (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kenneth

message: There are two comments in the article that I have flagged with  tags:
#"it was the most popular serial of 1938, according to a tally published in The Motion Picture Herald"
#"the first serial that Columbia brought back as a reprint"
The first needs a reference to a specific issue of The Motion Picture Herald to be valid.  The other is worse in that there is no source quoted for this information at all.  A reference needs to be added to verify this piece of information. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations needed
Talk:Boji Tower

message: These aren't the best when it comes to quality. Maybe I can gather some more images today or tomorrow. DÅØ (talk) 14:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course I am partial, but I think my photo in the infobox is one of the few views you can get of the entire building.  The pictures in the gallery, however, leave much to be desired. --Criticalthinker (talk) 03:23, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Quality 
Talk:William Lee Golden

message: *Object - I think that he his notable enough to have his own article. He has relased solo albums and is know for more than just being part of the Oak Ridge Boys. Also, the part about the historic signifigance of his house may not be able to stand up in an article by itself, nor would it fit in in the group's page. Furthermore, it would be unfortunate to lose information about Golden similar to the way Richard Sterban was redirected to ORB. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 20:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Merge with [[The Oak Ridge Boys]] 

message: His marital status info probably needs to be updated.....his divorce from Brenda became final Aug. 2014  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banditz71 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divorce from Brenda........
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Alinob77

message: Note:
Have all also been blocked, based on being new users and engaging in similar behavior at the same DRV.  Could, I suppose, be some other vandal trying to make this editor have an even worse name for some stupid political shenanigans, but either way, they are blocked.  GRBerry 18:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose that is a possibility, but looking at the sentence structure and choice of wording, I would bet it is the same person. - Rjd0060 18:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kamisato, Saitama

message: The redirect Kamisato has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Q𝟤𝟪 08:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Kamisato]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:192nd Wing

message: I added a section to explain the nomenclature of 192d Fighter Wing and 192nd Fighter Wing. Otr500 (talk) 01:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:The Spider Returns

message: In the credits to this and the previous serial, Ram Singh is played by Kenneth Duncan. Is there any evidence this is Kenne Duncan?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.249.247.245 (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDb and assorted books, such as In the Nick of Time by William C. Cline, directly name Kenne Duncan.  Kenne (pronounced Kenny) is just a short version of Kenneth that he seemed to use most often as his professional name. In any case, I have created a redirect from Kenneth Duncan to Kenne Duncan as no article existed for that name, although the cast links should still use the Kenne Duncan name in case Kenneth Duncan is changed to a disambiguation page at some later date. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 17:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kenneth was his birth name; a review of the IMDb shows that Kenne Duncan (stage name) was sometimes credited as Kenneth Duncan and Ken Duncan. Deanlaw (talk) 04:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Kenneth
Talk:Who and What

message: Okay, I've seen the proof that this will be a crossover between CSI: and Without a Trace, but can someone provide a link proving that it will extend to CSI: NY? Cougar Draven 18:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This from someone who has watched the preview suggests it starts in CSI and ends in WaT. Not sure where the other information comes from but it looks to be wrong. (Emperor 02:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've already seen information on the WaT cross. I just want to know where there's info on the possible CSI: NY crossover. I look forward to it, if that's the case. Cougar Draven 01:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What I was doing was highlighting the fact that while the WaT crossover has been flagged there are no mentions of this story crossing over to CSI:NY despite the story details being out for future episodes. If it had been say a CSI-WaT-CSI:NY arc across the three series then it would have been mentioned all at the same time. I'm curious where the mention of CSI:NY came from as I looked around and found nothing. As it stands it should probably be removed and put back if a source emerges. (Emperor 02:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. It stays gone for now, until verifiable information arises, or until the episode airs. Cougar Draven 01:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep - if anyone can source it then fine but I'd have thought there would have been a hint of it by now but perhaps it is just that if it is a three-parter the details on the last part are yet to emerge. We'll see. (Emperor 02:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossover Status