lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Silver chromate

message: A kind of lithium battery uses this inorganic compoundAgre22 (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for mentioning this, I would not have caught it otherwise. Li-batteries have now been added in the Applications section.A. T. Galenitis (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lithium batteries 

message: Just as I said. The picture link appears broken. I'll try and see if its fixable, otherwise I'll remove it. --Pstanton (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture is broken 

message: I would like to add a new structural drawing to this compound. I'd really appreciate it if someone could provide me with some tips and things to watch out for regarding the format, etc. Thanks in advance! --TheGreatPanda (talk) 04:59, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New structural drawing 

message: Please review the following three structural drawings, they were made with ChemOffice2010 and conform to standards of chemical drawings to the best of my ability. 
Please let me know if anything should be changed or improved. Any input is appreciated!
The structures are based on the following article:
Hackert, Marvin L., and Robert A. Jacobson. "The Crystal Structure of Silver Chromate." Journal of Solid State Chemistry 3.3 (1971): 364-8. --TheGreatPanda (talk) 09:07, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, for the structural formula I prepared a version with the chromate ion drawn in realistic tetrahdral geometry and with all Cr–O bonds equivalent, which is consistent with the use on other chromate articles. For the second picture the result is nice (especially if accurate bond distances have been used), but it doesn't seem to fit in with the typical wikipedia or textbook diagram. Probably a very late reply, but just to say that every effort in article improvement is valued! I think a schematic depiction of the unit cell bonding would be particularly welcome at this stage.A. T. Galenitis (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviewers needed! 

message: In a previous version of the article there was mention of silver chromate being a "chemical precursor to modern photography". After some time looking around I couldn't find any reliable reference on the photographic use of the compound; although both dichromates (in gum bichromate printing) and of course silver halides (in the gelatin silver process etc.) have been used for early and later photographic procedures, I cannot find any using a silver chromate/dichromate salt. So far I've removed any mention of photography in the article, but if anyone has more knowledge (and references) on the topic please correct this. A. T. Galenitis (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in photography
Talk:Silver sulfate

message: Actually, to my knowledge silver sulfate is not soluble in water. Can anyone confirm? 71.198.65.9 21:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1.2 g/dm is not actually a very high solubility (that's 12 grams in a litre), although I agree I thought it was lower (~0.8g/dm)... But it is slightly soluble in water. Zatnik (talk) 06:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Silver sulfide

message: "In the monoclinic form there are two crystallographically distinct silver monkeys with two and three near neighbour sulfur atoms."
I'm pretty sure "monkeys" is not the correct word to use here. I don't know what the correct word actually is, so I just deleted the entire phrase for now. If you do know what that sentence is supposed to mean, then you can restore the phrase if you wish (with the correct term, of course).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.29.155.57 (talk) 15:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted- with reference. For monkeys read atoms- vandalism!Axiosaurus (talk) 15:37, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silver Monkeys? 

message: 2Ag (s) + H2 S (g) → Ag2 S (s) + H2 (g)
:Barbara ✐  ✉  17:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: This article begins with a self-referencing definition - "Silver sulfide is the sulfide of silver".  It adds nothing to the article and needs to either be re-written or removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:407:C780:43D7:DCF3:D371:5061:C75D (talk) 08:13, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence
Talk:Silver(I,III) oxide

message: How exactly is this a peroxide? --Belg4mit 01:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Abstract: The results of a literature survey on the valence of silver in argentic oxide (AgO) are presented.  Physical and chemical evidence indicates the presence of both trivalent and monovalent silver in argentic oxide, but no divalent silver.
post about the multivalent compound (BTW, AgO2 would be silver ozonide.):
*"Re: Silver Oxide = Silver(I)Oxide and also Silver(II)Oxide why?" MadSci Network.
some more:
*http://google.com/search?q=tetrasilver-tetroxide+OR+tetrasilver-tetraoxide
Silver peroxide or silver(I) peroxide would be AgO or Ag2O2.  Many authors mistake silver(I,III) oxide for silver peroxide.  WebElements lists AgO for the former rather than Ag2OAg2O3. -lysdexia 01:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misnomer
Talk:Sodium cyanoborohydride

message: ammonium acetate mentions its use in the borch reaction, which redirects to this page but neither page discusses how ammonium acetate is involved. -- Waveguy (talk) 01:23, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: how is ammonium acetate involved?

message: Bottom of the page : 
"Sodium borohydride - a reductant milder than the cyanoborohydride"
Shouldn't it be the opposite, given sodium borohydride ability to reduce other carbonyles, that cyanoborohydride can not ?
--Smokefoot (talk) 12:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: harsher than NaBH4 ?

message: — Assignment last updated by CHEM 300 UBC CJA (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300
Talk:Sodium dichromate

message: This molecule is a known carcinogen and I have updated the safety section. I will add more detail about this later. It is currently spotlighted in a lawsuit against Kellog, Brown and Root. Enviropearson (talk) 15:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sodium dichromate is not a molecule, and Wikipedia is not a US program so when you refer to "DHHS National Toxicology Program" be senstive to that fact, e.g. "the U.S. DHHS National Toxicology Program.." The MSDS probably provides sufficient information on the hazards.--Smokefoot (talk) 22:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Safety Section
Talk:Sodium hexafluoroaluminate

message: For example chemicalland21's page for this chemical compound has NO hyperlinks or
other evidence.  It's as if you want to a page in a glossy magazine published in 1977 - the
fonts are nice, but there is no hint that there is a world wide web.
Are there alternatives site that have similar details, but are able to link to other sites?
Wikip rhyre (talk) 22:23, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links to sites that aren't very "Web" 

message: A section states:
"Often the hexafluorosilicic acid, which is recovered from phosphate mining, is the precursor in a two-step process beginning with neutralization with ammonia to give ammonium hexafluorosilicate:"
This is, however, not supported by the equations, as we magically jump to hexafluoroaluminic acid, without dealing with the formation of any ammonium hexafluorosilicate, at all. It seems to me that a 'zeroeth' step involves the reaction between aluminum oxide and hexafluorosilicic acid, without the formation of ammonium hexafluorosilicate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perklorsav (talk • contribs) 17:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logical error in the synthetic chemical equations
Talk:Sodium metatitanate

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Sodium trititanate. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 29#Sodium trititanate until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Keres🌕Luna edits! 04:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sodium trititanate" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sodium metavanadate

message: I believe there are (at least) two polymorphs of NaVO3. I've made a few images of the α and β forms, as requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Image Request.
Alpha polymorph
File:Alpha-sodium-metavanadate-unit-cell-1974-CM-3D-balls.png
File:Alpha-sodium-metavanadate-chain-from-xtal-1974-CM-3D-balls.png
File:Alpha-sodium-metavanadate-chain-from-xtal-1974-CM-3D-polyhedra.png
Beta polymorph
File:Beta-sodium-metavanadate-xtal-1984-CM-3D-balls.png
File:Beta-sodium-metavanadate-xtal-1984-V-coordination-CM-3D-balls.png
File:Beta-sodium-metavanadate-chain-from-xtal-1984-CM-3D-balls.png
File:Beta-sodium-metavanadate-chain-from-xtal-1984-CM-3D-polyhedra.png
Ben (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I like the structues with the unit cells and the Na+ ions best, but feel free to select other structures to be shown in the article. --Leyo 13:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crystal structure pictures
Talk:Sodium peroxide

message: Just passing through, I noticed that the given thermal decomposition equation in the properties section doesn't balance, and doesn't match the text. I guess from the text that it would be 2Na2O2 → 2Na2O + O2, but I'm not a chemist nor experienced enough with the compound to be sure. Can someone with the appropriate skills fix it up? Thanks. 118.208.75.23 (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct equation for thermal decomposition?
Talk:Sodium phosphide

message: Sodium phosphide, Na3P, has the hexagonal sodium arsenide structure. I have corrected the info box so that the coordination shows the solid state. As for Ni3P trigonal pyramid- this presumably relates to vapour phase molecular form. Has anyone any reference that shows under what circumstances this form has been physically detected? --Axiosaurus (talk) 09:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:Sodium sulfide

message: Someone should please check the given PubChem Id (currently 237873) - it points to Na2HS. Probably PubChem entry  14804 (Na2S) fits better!? NE5147-1202 (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  PubChem Id 

message: Is the image OK?--Wickey-nl (talk) 14:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It has an antifluorite structure, so the fluorite image works well for this any many related materials.  Alkali metal oxides are the same, I think. The main message we aimed for was that readers understand that S2- only exists in the solid, and virtually no where else.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chembox 

message: You guys feel the Japanese suicide epidemic caused by inhaling sodium sulfide should have a section in the article?
It's the only reason I know what sodium sulphide is and why I came to this page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.155.250 (talk) 15:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure thing, just provide some references when you write the section and follow Wikipedia Manual of style bcartolo (talk) 13:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

text: Probably not a big deal.  It's trivia in my book - 99.99999% is used for other purposes.   A sentence in the safety section.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Suicuides 

message: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040603102001582
phase diagram of SodiumSulfide and water. Shows Eutectic freeze below 0degC at 10%conc. then 50 and 100. 
well 100degC is boil... 
 Wikistallion (talk) 15:48, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phase diagram 

message: "Both are colorless water-soluble salts (...)" versus "Although the solid is yellow, solutions of it are colorless."Eudialytos (talk) 20:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancies 

message: Na2S  9H2O   =  Na2SO3 +H18O6  =  Na2SO3+6H3O
So...   H3O is anxious. instead of H2O2.
Here it is.
a hydrate of Sulfide    is  a Sulfite  and HYDRONIUM. Wikistallion (talk) 16:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eh... the HYDRONIUM.
Talk:Tellurate

message: The paper Tetrahedral Tellurate, Saki Konaka, Yoshiki Ozawa  and Atsushi Yagasaki 
Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47 (4), pp 1244–1245, DOI: 10.1021/ic701578p claims to be the first example  of a discrete tetrahedral tellurate, namely tetraethylammonium tellurate dihydrate. There is at least one   other example with tetrahedral TeO42-, Rb6Te2O9 which contains both tetrahedral and pentagonal bipyramidal tellurate(VI) ions. Most salts such as Na2TeO4 contain the chain anion with 6 coordinate Te. The comment regarding double bonded Te-O is probably misplaced as it implies p-d pi bonds, the situation is probably more like that of sulfate with resonance making the 4 bonds equivalent and little or no d orbital participation. Axiosaurus (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metatellurate ion
Talk:Telluride (chemistry)

message: Tellurides do not have any great economic importance. Cadmium telluride does however have photovoltaic properties, and both bismuth telluride and lead telluride are exceptional thermoelectric materials, although not commercialized.
This text seems out dated. Bismuth Telluride is used in Peltier cooling heating devices.
* Laird Thermo-electric
* Tellurex
* Marlow
Just to name a few product lines circa 2020.  --206.223.175.102 (talk) 11:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial Importance
Talk:Tritellurium dichloride

message: What makes the structure of trans-[TeCl2(SC(NMe2)2)2] relevant for this article?
It probably is, but that needs explanation. 2001:9E8:2B36:7500:A53C:9C86:110:ABF7 (talk) 17:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  image with Telluriumdichloride complex
Talk:Tetrahydroxyborate

message: It may be that this citn. will be good enough, but something deeper would be nice:
      A. Earnshaw & Norman Greenwood, 1997. Chemistry of the Elements, 2nd Edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 203-205. [ ISBN13 978-0750633659 ]
The Raman information cited under boric acid may also help, but that is just to the Jolly text, and without page number, if I recall.
Prof D.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meduban (talk • contribs) 17:41, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  On borate ionization, hydrolysis issue
Talk:Thallium(I) bromide

message: Citation #5 does not provide evidence the band gap is 2.68 eV  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.62.39.16 (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Band Gap

message: It is in List_of_semiconductor_materials with many applications - but what is the size and type of the band gap ? and for which of the two crystal structures mentioned ? ... Temperature Dependence of Spectroscopic Performance of Thallium Bromide X- and Gamma-Ray Detectors says (2.68 eV) - Rod57 (talk) 16:40, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semiconductor properties
Talk:Thionyl fluoride

message: * MW: R.C. Ferguson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1954) 76, 850-853
* MW: N. J. D. Lucas, J. G. Smith J. Mol. Spectrosc. (1972) 3, 327-341
* ED: I. Hargittai, F. C. Mijlhoff, J. Mol. Struct. (1973) 1, 69-77
* DFT: B. S. Jursic, THEOCHEM (1997) 1-2, 75-81
* Raman: A. Kornath, N. Hartfeld, J. Mol. Spectrosc. (1997) 2, 336-340
* Bonus ref - use as a reagent: W. T. Konieczko, A. Łopusiński, J. Michalski, Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. (1989) 42, 103-104
Ben (talk) 18:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure references
Talk:Thorium(IV) sulfide

message: The article previously sourced info from a passing mention in a problem in this textbook:
According to this book, Thorium disulfide has a "TiO2 lattice type". Titatium dioxide is polymorphic, so this is not really very specific, but neither rutile and anatase structures are supported: I have found no other comparison to TiO2 in the literature, and even theoretically MaterialsProject only lists a stable structure in the Pnma space group.  I've removed the info, since it seems to be an error. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 17:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rutile structure
Talk:Tin selenide

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 06:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say that readers are more likely to find them and search for them by their current names. Check the references in our articles and you will find them either as tin selenide/telluride or SnSe/SnTe, but rarely as tin(II). Kanatzidis group's very famous Nature paper has tin selenide only as SnSe, and their recent paper calls it tin selenide. Many more similar examples. The fact that there is no tin(II) telluride redirect page (as of 2022-06-29) is also quite telling! Please KEEP current names. Ponor (talk) 06:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 June 2022
Talk:Titanium aluminide

message: This verbiage is liffed directly from the Reade Materials commercial site.
http://www.reade.com/latin-america-pma/776  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pzzp (talk • contribs) 14:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Reade copied every thing from wikipedia and gives it as a source.--Stone (talk) 23:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio? ... no, they copied from wikipedia

message: The Rockwell X-30 was to have been largely made from it but it was found to be too vulnerable to cracking. - Rod57 (talk) 09:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Considered for use in X-30 

message: Intro starts just gamma-TiAl, but then mentions gamma TiAl, alpha 2-Ti3Al and TiAl3. Simpler to cover all three here ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of article - just gamma form, or all three forms ?
Talk:Titanium hydride

message: It would be nice to have a phase diagram inserted under Material properties. Plasmic Physics (talk) 07:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phase diagram 

message: It is neccesary to independently verify your sources, Chemspider is not a useable source for chemical data or names, and apparently, neither is PubChem. This evident from the quality of the information added to the recently proposed chembox. The compound most certainly does not melt at the given temperature, nor does it have a definite formula, and hence, nor a stoichiometric systematic name. Plasmic Physics (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable sources
Talk:Superphosphate

message: The article used to define coprolites as fossilised dinosaur dung.  It is any fossilised dung.
My understanding is that dinosaur fossils have to be made of things less soluble than phosphate to have survived, so this is unlikely to have been dinosaur coprolites.  Can someone who knows more palaeontology confirm this? LachlanA (talk) 07:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fossilised dung, but probably not from dinosaurs
Talk:Tungsten disulfide

message: Shouldn't this article be called "Tungsten disulfide"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.63.151 (talk) 22:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title 

message: "In combination with elastic materials, flexible shock absorbing materials can be produced.[2]"
The source is a roleplaying game site, refering to a fictional materials system. This is about the last source on Earth that should be selected for scientific evidence. It should be replaced with a link to an actual science article.--Woerkilt (talk) 13:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thank you. NIMSoffice (talk) 23:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Source 

message: Could mention superconductivity in monolayers and nanotubes eg Electrostatically Induced Superconductivity at the Surface of WS2. - Rod57 (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  superconductivity in monolayers and nanotubes 

message: Some companies, specifically Micro Swiss (example at https://store.micro-swiss.com/collections/nozzles/products/m2-hardened-high-speed-steel-nozzle-reprap-m6-thread-1-75mm-filament) and E3D Online (example at https://e3d-online.com/products/v6-nozzles in the "Nozzle X" section) use this material as a non-stick coating used to reduce the amount of plastic that gets stuck to the outside of the nozzle, helping to reduce printing defects caused by buildup that falls off into the model being printed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BFeely (talk • contribs) 16:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  3D printer nozzle application
Talk:Tungsten(V) bromide

message: WP is not a cookbook; while some discussion on the preparation is desirable, the level of detail in your version seems excessive. The sentence "Purification entails sublimation.[2]" probably should be expanded, but apart from that, an extended discussion on purification etc. is not appropriate or desirable here. The chemist seeking to prepare this compound can go find out from the primary literature. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 16:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of 159.28.39.124
Talk:Uranium(IV) sulfate

message: Uranium(IV) sulfates are extremely rare in the nature (as is already written at the bottom of the article). UranYL sulfate minerals are of course more common, but still they represent relatively rare secondary U minerals. Uranyl phosphate minerals are the most common secondary U minerals. Eudialytos (talk) 20:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Natural occurrence

message: "involves reduction of U(VI) to the far less soluble U(IV). (...) U(SO4)2 is soluble in water, and thus far more mobile". So.. less soluble or more soluble? Because "Far more mobile" means (almost exclusively) MORE soluble.Eudialytos (talk) 19:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancy
Talk:Uranyl zinc acetate

message: The paragraph that reads "The process for catalytic synthesis of toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (TDI) from dimethyl carbonate (DMC) consists of two steps. Starting from the catalytic reaction between toluene-2,4-diamine (TDA) and DMC, dimethyl toluene-2,4-dicarbamate (TDC) is formed, and then decomposed to TDI. For the first step, the yield of TDC is 53.5% at a temperature of 250 °C, over Zn(OAc)2/alpha–Al2O3 catalyst. For the second step, the yield of TDI is 92.6% at temperatures of 250–270 °C and under pressure of 2.7 kPa, over uranyl zinc acetate catalyst, when di-n-octyl sebacate(DOS) is used as heat-carrier, and a mixture of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and nitrobenzene is used as solvent." has been copied directly from another source (http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jctb.455).
Minerallad 07:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Vanadium(III) oxide

message: Isn't V2O3 ionic so it would be "Vanadium (III) Oxide" instead of "Vanadium Trioxide"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakebarrington (talk • contribs) 17:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, I relabeled it.  --Smokefoot (talk) 17:45, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ionic Compound!
Talk:Vanadium(IV) oxide

message: Since the electronic properties change at 67 °C, how does the appearance change ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:59, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it still blue when over 67 °C and in rutile form 

message: What's up with the first and second references to "Haynes"? They are used in the Chembox sidebar, I'm not sure what it actually refers to. Celia Cunningham (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: How much do electrical and thermal conductivity change in the metallic/rutile transition at 67 C ? Can we add the figures for a rutile form, or even better two graphs, each against temp ? or identify a source that has them - Rod57 (talk) 13:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much do electrical and thermal conductivity change in the metallic/rutile transition at 67 C
Talk:Vanadyl sulfate

message: Vanadium, the Periodic Table element should always be capitalized in this text. References to Vanadyl Sulfate as an industrial or labelled product should be capitalized where possible. Otherwise use Vanadyl sulfate.
:Please talk to the community about this idea. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry.  --Smokefoot (talk) 02:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typography