Talk:Dark Water (2005 film)

message: In the plot section, scenes that appear only in the unrated edition should be in bold text. Should there be any scenes from the theatrical version cut from the unrated edition, they be written in italic text. Who agrees with me? 68.37.116.234 15:01, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't necessarily agree with you on that because that would make the story section seem rather confusing. If you want to do a scene by scene variation explanation, it would make more sense to simply create a new section in the article for it and point out what scenes differ between the two versions of the film. That aside, the story section itself could seriously use a rewrite. It is rather confusing as it is, omitting various crucial details while jumbling together bits and pieces of the actual story in the film to make it seem like it all makes sense (for instance it does not mention anything about Dahlia's lawyer helping her uncover the mystery behind the Rimsky's daughter) but instead makes it seem like Dahlia just magically knew about it all as if she had some sort of psychic sense about it. No offense to whomever initially wrote it all, but it is very poorly done. 63.233.14.25 00:56, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences 

message: What has to be specified or cleaned up? --68.37.116.234 12:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Up? 

message: :Image:Darkwaterr1artworkpic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Darkwaterr1artworkpic.jpg

message: :Image:Dark water imp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Dark water imp.jpg

message: I understand most of sentences in this article; all of them that I read have good grammar, as do all of the opening sentences of every paragraph. I also understand how to sign my posts; apparently I'm the only one that does. JohndanR (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Grammar