Talk:Yakko, Wakko, and Dot

message: Someone must fix that, I don't know how.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.112.6.104 (talk) 22:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Article's Intro." 

message: The article says Wakko's accent is a Scouse accent, but I read the description of that accent and see very little similarity... - furrykef (Talk at me) 14:17, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wakko's accent 

message: The musicians section needs a little cleaning up... Maybe just collapsing the headers and getting rid of "just the major ones".--Htmlism 21:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musicians - Prose 

message: Whoever you are, please stop adding this article to the fictional dogs and fictional orphans categories:
# Fictional dogs: The Warners are not dogs. They are not any particular species at all. They explicitly deny they are dogs and cats, as well as several other things, in the cartoon What Are We?. The show's creators repeatedly have said they're not anything in particular.
# Fictional orphans: They are not orphans. They were created as completely new characters, as shown in the Newsreel of the Stars opening to several episodes. They play orphans in Wakko's Wish, but that's a role they adopt for that one story. The announcer on Cartoon Network was simply wrong, and is not an authoritative source.
Finally, your combative edit summaries are not helpful or appropriate. If you keep adding these bogus categories to the article, they will keep getting removed. If you keep adding them long enough, the article is likely to be semi-protected so that anonymous editors cannot edit it at all. Please stop. -- Jay Maynard 03:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (I know this is a ridiculously long time after this page has been touched last, but here goes nothing.) Pretty much everything in Wakko's Wish, arguably even including the Warner's personalities for the most part, should not be considered canon. I must also add that their personalities and roles described in the current article are still leaning a bit toward the belief in Wakko's Wish as canon, it seems. Wikitiki999 (talk) 07:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional dogs and fictional orphans categories 

message: Someone added this category to the article, as well as "The trio are actually aliens, but are variously referred to as animals", etc. I haven't seen every episode, but this just seems wrong, and I've removed it. While the species is deliberately unclear, they're (within the show) cartoon characters, created by the animators at Warner Bros., right here on Earth, in a way like the Toons in Who Framed Roger Rabbit. PaulGS 19:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional extraterrestrials? 

message: no one's mentioned that they've been called monkeys in a song by the professor. ("don't know what to say the monkeys won't do")
does that deserve a mention in the "species" section?
they're a fictional species like marsupilami --Lerdthenerd 19:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  monkeys? 

message: Bias, anyone? I'm removing the 'subsequently'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.15.64 (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'He's the middle child, and subsequently the most weird and absurd of the bunch' 

message: The Pictures of both Yakko and Wakko could be a lot better. If anyone can get some please do. - User:Grant-Sud Jan/13/2009.
I think Yakko's picture is horible and wakko's isn't much better, if I could change it I would but I don't know how. If someone knows how to change them Please do!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.122.51.193 (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible Pictures 

message: :Image:Dot Warner.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added fair use rationales for the pictures of Yakko and Wakko, but the picture of Dot has already been deleted. Can someone please re-upload it? PaulGS (talk) 08:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Dot Warner.JPG

message: :Image:Wakko Warner.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wakko Warner.JPG

message: :Image:Yakko Warner.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Yakko Warner.JPG

message: What is the relevance of the Japanese voice actors? Either we should list all international voice actors or just leave the information out. Albertonykus (talk) 00:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese voices

message: In Yakko's bio, the lead sentence states that he is twelve.  Farther down in parenthesis, it states that his age is unknown, but beleived to be about ten.  I removed the parenthetical reference to his age, since it contradicted the lead.  I kept the age 12 reference because it seemed to be written in the same style (and by inference the same person) that give the ages in the bios of Wakko and Dot.  It seemed that the parenthetical reference was added after the fact and caused the contradiction.  If you feel this is wrong, please revert.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Van Vidrine (talk • contribs) 17:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yakko's age 

message: Are there any good images of the characters that we could use for the infobox? I think it'd be best if we tried to find another since this one has Pinky and the Brain in it as well. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image