lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Amelia Kinkade

message: While I have my personal doubts about the field, she appears notable. I've sourced the claims and removed the tags. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 00:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: Does anyone know if she was a dancer in the "Girls Just Want to Have Fun" film, or in the Cyndi Lauper music video? If it was the film, the link needs to be modified to reflect that. Gil gosseyn (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girls Just Want to Have Fun 

message: This section seems a bit out of place in its current form. The blockquote syntax seems a bit undue and it combines reviews of both her acting and writing. Perhaps there's a better way to incorporate the content contained into the section into the other sections of the article? -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We could certainly split it into sub-sections, one for her work as an actress, and one for her books. It is my view that a "critical reaction" or "critical response" section is usually the best way to present reviewsm of a creative person's work, particularly when these are being used in part to establish notability. I think it only confuses things to have reviews mixed in with an account of the work itself.  Wikipedia:Quotations r3eccomends that blockquote be used for quotations lo9nger than 40 words.  So does MOS:BLOCKQUOTE. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 21:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it's just the location of the section as a whole which seems odd to me. It seems like it should come before the "Books" (i.e. Bibliography) section per :MOS:BIB. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the comments on the books should come after the list of books, but that is a detail, and i wouldn't object to the section being moved before the list of publications. Does anyone else have a view on this? DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 02:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reaction 

message: I've temporarily hid the infobox because it's way (in my opinion) a :WP:DISINFOBOX than not. The article isn't really that long to begin with, but there's no need infobox that basically is just the :MOS:LEAD in template form. Even if a freely-licensed image were found to use in the article, such a overly simple infobox probably wouldn't be needed. If the article continues to be expanded allowing more of the relevant parameters of infobox to be populated, then perhaps it would make sense to have one. This was a :WP:BOLD edit, but I'm just adding a bit more of explanation as to why I made it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree—thanks for commenting it out for the time being. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Rice Christian

message: Interesting this article was not created until now! Or was it? Was it deleted? I would like to know and debate.--Scheibenzahl 20:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can view the logs by clicking history and then View logs for this page.  If it had been deleted & recreated, the logs would say so. JIMp talk·cont 13:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: The term is often used by right-wing Hindutva groups in India.[6][7]
This particular line in the article and the news articles provide has no direct co-relation. Those particular news Articles doesn't in any prove that the term is often used by the right-wing hindutva groups. Harshppp (talk) 06:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are the related?
Talk:Dominic Rains

message: Which should the article be titled?  Both come up in Google, but Amin has the edge in results (1,600-800), possibly due to mirror sites.  RJaguar3 | u | t 15:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I know he went by Amin when he was in Flight 93, and only recently adopted the new name. We do have a redirect, so that should be fine, but he's in a new TV show as Dominic Rains, so maybe that would be preferable. Morhange 17:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amin Nazemzadeh or Dominic Rains 
Talk:Zémire et Azor

message: Hmm. I put a fact tag on the (minimal?) reference to Notes to the EMI recording. to indicate that the contributor concerned might say which recording was involved, who wrote the notes etc. I see a recording is listed above the 'Sources'. Presumably this is the one involved, no? --Kleinzach 10:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the CD. I'm not sure why we need to give all this information. IIRC the English booklet notes are three pages long (including the synopsis). There's nothing remotely controversial in this article that needs specific citing (except, maybe, Grétry's being "Belgian"). --Folantin (talk) 11:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Expanded now. --Folantin (talk) 11:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''"Bizarre "citation needed" tag"''
Talk:Nasim Ashraf

message: Do you mean succeeded? I'm unfamiliar with the man, but under the context it suggests you mean after and not before. Cheers. AllynJ 22:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He preceded Shaharyar Khan as the head of the board's ad-hoc committee, following Khan's resignation" 

message: Wow, just from skimming it it may be Good Article status already. Definitely send it to Did you Know.--Wizardman 00:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiproject Biography review

message: I've created redirect pages for Nasim Ashraf and Dr. Nasim Ashraf; I'm just wondering whether this page should be moved to "Nasim Ashraf" permanently. The references in the articles use both "Naseem" and "Nasim", but I think a majority use "Nasim". What do you think? - Ozzykhan 14:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: Article is written in a very POV manner, much unencyclopedic and dramatic negative tone like "like his predecessor, Ashraf's promises have served as all but lip service and the constitution to date remains no where to be seen" and the whole page is resembling an attack page almost. Also, it seems to be heavily based on the opinion of the sources which are heavily the opinion of two pundits from Cricinfo:Osman S and Kamran Abbasi, and not much in the way of facts and historical occurrences. Also it seems that the author of the page User:Zainubrazvi has used his own blogs for the sources, which are not acceptable at all, especially in a BLP. Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 05:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed GA
Talk:Twofer

message: Perhaps moving this to a page on stage power distro would be better. I think it may be too narrow.--Wforlines 20:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless, it still seems far too narrow to me. The situation that you describe would apply to so, so few members of the Wikipedia userbase that it's not worth considering. I say merge with stage power. TheIslander 16:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Texaco Trophy

message: I've removed the redirect to NatWest Series and re-created the article here: there should be enough material to justify an article on Texaco Trophy, and besides that the NatWest Series article only covers the period since 2000, and doesn't cover the 1984-1998 period at all.  --RFBailey (talk) 04:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article re-creation
Talk:A Most Peculiar Man

message: FYI I redirected this article to the associated album Sounds of Silence.  The reason is that the article pretty much only had the lyrics to the song and little other information.  It also had no references for verification and, by posting the entire lyrics, might be violating copyright.  So for now replaced it with a redirect to the album on which it first appeared.  
Now if and when there is something interesting to say about the song that can be verified from an independently published reference, then it would probably be ok to create an article about the song itself. For now, though, a stand alone article doesn't seem warranted. Dugwiki 21:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected to [[Sounds of Silence]]
Talk:Andoy Balunbalunan

message: I'm trying to clean this article up, but can't find any information to substantiate the last paragraph, about his career as a recording artist and his wife's continued involvement in the entertainment industry. Can someone help out here, so we can remove that pesky unreferenced tag? Thanks! Fred.Pendleton (talk) 19:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, if this kind of very late but I just expanded it and added many sources.--Jojit (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Women's Cricket World Cup

message: Icc 2409:4061:4E10:AB98:9C39:F82D:55B1:B5E3 (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Cup 
Talk:Roy E. Furman

message: This is an odd entry, but Roy Furman was my neighbor in New Cumberland PA after he was lieutenant governor.  He had one son, who was a bit younger than me but a friend.  I don't remember his name.  Any of you Furman biographers can tell me his first name and where he is now?   In addition to "frog_one" on Wikipedia, my real name is Tom Croke Frog one (talk) 02:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Query: Roy Furman's son
Talk:Roy M. Goodman

message: I have more than once removed material that is referenced to sources that in fact contain almost none of the information claimed.  Specifically, the following claims have been added and then re-added, but neither cited source actually contains them:
*"Goodman is notorious among New York Republicans"
*"Mario Cuomo... was considered unbeatable"
*"Goodman checked his Rolodex and found Rinfret..." -- the story says the Roldex belonged to "a friend of State Senator Roy M. Goodman"
*"Rinfret... whom he knew socially"
*"Goodman picked Rinfret because he was pro-choice on abortion"
*"Goodman picked Rinfret because... as a millionaire economist, could spend some of his own money on the campaign"
*"Rinfret's campaign quickly became a disaster and a national laughing-stock"
A section entitled As New York County Republican Chairman cited no sources whatsoever.
I have yet again removed all material not backed up by a reliable source.  Please do not re-add this material again without citing a reliable source for each of these claims, as well as those set out in As New York County Republican Chairman. --Rrburke(talk) 17:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition of unsourced material
Talk:Incinerate (song)

message: *IMHO merge into Sonic Youth or delete. We don't need seperate articles on every single song by a band, minor, major or whatever. Pedro |  Chat   21:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

message: ::Of course this subject is notable! An article about a song released by a popular artist (their last album charted at 71 on the US billboard 200) is perfectly acceptable. I just need to edit the page some more... copied from article main page by Pedro |  Chat   21:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I sugest it be merged into Rather Ripped that already exists. Is this song so notable that it needs it's own article? If so please provide citation. Pedro |  Chat   21:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response
Talk:Ndu languages

message: I've corrected the definition given for 'Ndu', which Laycock says means 'man'. 
The earlier version of the page defined it as 'water'.  This is actually the meaning of 'Ok' in the Ok languages.
Toksave tasol
MarcusCole12 12:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of 'Ndu
Talk:Tayap language

message: The "Grammar" section contains the following paragraph:
"There is a fundamental distinction in verbal morphology between realis and irrealis stems and suffixes. Grammatical relations are marked by verbal suffixes, which distinguish Subject/Agent (S/A) and Object (O). In some conjugations S/A is marked by discontinuous morphemes. Free pronouns and noun phrases mark the ergative case (A) compared to unmarked forms for the absolutive (S/O). As in many Papuan languages which have an ergative case, the ergative marker is optional and is frequently omitted."
That is an unattributed, direct word-for-word copy from Kulick's "Grammar and Dictionary of Tayap" book, page 25, without any kind of credit given for those words. I have not extensively checked the other sections for direct word-for-word copies like that, so it can very well be that that occurs in more places than that paragraph.
94.114.224.150 (talk) 00:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just reworded the paragraph and provided attribution (I did not insert the paragraph by the way). — Sagotreespirit (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential plagiarism
Talk:Andrew-Lee Potts

message: He is well funny on primeval thats the only reson I watch it coz of Abbie (Hannah Spearritt) and Connor (andrew-lee potts)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jammie-leigh (talk • contribs) 22:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primeval
Talk:Andrew Airlie

message: This article was vandalised, by content being removed.  It was then nominated for deletion based upon the missing content that the nominator removed.  I have removed the AfD tag for now.  If you feel this article should be deleted, please feel free to nominate it for deletion.   KP Botany 20:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Yimas language

message: ==Untitled==
I worked on this article as a student editor through my university's Linguistics department. Before I began my research, this was a stub article, and the only main section that was present was Phonology, which contained Consonants, Vowels, and Stress. I have added the Syllable structure section as well as the main sections Nouns and noun morphology, Verbal morphology, and Syntax, as well as all of their current subsections. The majority of my data was gathered from Foley's grammar on the Yimas language.
One change to preexisting content was adding stress markers to the chart in the Stress section. The previous author used the same Foley resource, so I added the markers that the resource included. I also put the preexisting Pronouns section into my longer section about Nouns and noun morphology.
Juliekallini (talk) 07:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Making significant changes to this article

message: I worked on this article as a student editor through my university's Linguistics department. Before I began my research, this was a stub article, and the only main section that was present was Phonology, which contained Consonants, Vowels, and Stress. I have added the Syllable structure section as well as the main sections Nouns and noun morphology, Verbal morphology, and Syntax, as well as all of their current subsections. The majority of my data was gathered from Foley's grammar on the Yimas language.
One change to preexisting content was adding stress markers to the chart in the Stress section. The previous author used the same Foley resource, so I added the markers that the resource included. I also put the preexisting Pronouns section into my longer section about Nouns and noun morphology.
Juliekallini (talk) 07:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andrew Dan-Jumbo

message: i did some small cleaning up of this article, but as i've never made any major edits to pages, i'm not sure how well i did. if anyone else can help me out, i'd appreciate it! - Ally525 03:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean-up 
Talk:Monmouthshire and Brecon Canal

message: From some time before 1856:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/the-monmouthshire-canal-at-newport-156099
Geni (talk) 23:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Painting of the canal

message: The figure given in the opening line appears to be incorrect. The section within the national park alone is around 32 miles, then there's the continuation via the Pontymoile Basin to Cwmbran and then south to its junction with the Crumlin Arm and the extension to Newport- the Canal and River Trust website at https://canalrivertrust.org.uk/enjoy-the-waterways/canal-and-river-network/monmouthshire-and-brecon-canal gives the currently navigable section as 35 miles in length. cheers Geopersona (talk) 20:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of the canal
Talk:Andrew McCulloch (drummer)

message: " elsewhere in the UK outside" - what does that mean ? -- Beardo (talk) 23:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the result of liberal state-supported education where it's ok - anything goes.  Needs to be fixed.  Badly. 104.169.28.48 (talk) 21:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Childhood
Talk:Geography of Zambia

message: This reads: "Environment - current issues: air pollution and resulting acid rain in the mineral extraction and refining region". However the problem is more potential than actual according to this reference: American University Trade & Environment Database website: Zambia Copper Case which says "Environmentally, the most vulnerable to the pollution caused by the copper mining industry are the people located in the immediate vicinity of the mines, i.e. the miners and their families. However, if ever acid rain were to be produced by the gases from the copper smeltering  process, land, vegetation, water sources and people
hundreds of miles away could be affected." 
 
The comment in the Wikipedia article seems to be taken from the CIA World Factbook site which of course doesn't list any sources, nor give any data on the size of the problem. Neither does this source:National Overview – Zambia (source seems to be countrywatch.com
I haven't seen any report which quotes evidence that atmospheric pollution and acid rain is much of a problem compared to the far more serious problems of contamination of soil and water in the Copperbelt, and contaminated wind-blown dust which is a local problem in the vicinity of open pits and spoil tips. Rexparry sydney 21:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environment - current issues
Template talk:Organ transplantation

message: The title of this template bothers me a little bit as it is factually incorrect. This template contains links that relate to tissue transplantation as well as organ transplantation. Any suggestions for an alternative? Mike 05:34, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: It is my feeling that the "people" section of the template (group9) should include only notable people from the field of transplantation (i.e. surgeons, MDs, scientists etc). Notable recipients could be catered for by the already present link.
I would be interested to know if anyone felt strongly for or against such a change. I appreciate that such changes could prove sensitive. Mike 05:30, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  People section 

message: There is a section in this template called "Organizations related to Transplants". What should be the criteria for inclusion? I did a quick check on Google and on Yahoo!, and Google lists over one million related pages. Yahoo! lists 40 different organisations. Obviously, this template would become unwieldy if it included all 40. I'm inclined to think that only those organisations that are directly involved in the allocation of organs and tissues should be included in the template, and perhaps organisations that do more towards advocacy and awareness could be listed in a separate article, accessible via the template. Any thoughts? --Kyoko 21:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Worse, alloplant, a near-quack procedure has been added. What do we do about less than standard procedures that can now be called up from several dozen other (legitimate) articles?Student7 (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I included the Spanish organization since it has the better donation rate worldwide. --Error (talk) 23:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Other

message: If I create an article for Dr. Lori J. West (UAlberta), would anyone object if she is added to this template? She has revolutionized infant/toddler heart transplantation in three countries, and is the current head of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. She is also heading up a movement to reorganize transplantation in Canada. Here is a link with a bio: . Please see ABO-incompatible transplantation for more info on the effect that she has had. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 18:06, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add: One (of six) of the policy changes that is currently being voted on by UNOS is a direct result of her 2001 paper. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 18:10, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lori West 

message: The "German Bone Marrow Donor Center" (DKMS) could also be added, but needs translation from German page. The article is available in German Wikipedia (here). If I create the page could we add it to the template? The Spanish National Transplant Organization is already added. --Yahia.Mokhtar (talk) 10:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: German Bone Marrow Donor Center
Talk:River Sheaf

message: I like the link to the SilentUK article, but they don't say where or what this underground water way is; is it really the Sheaf? The only culverted stretch of the river it could be is between Granville Square and where it reaches the Don (somewhere around Blonk Street?) and it seems hard to believe that it goes deep enough to allow such a spacious set of tunnels. --VinceBowdren 10:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the link--it doesn't say where it is, and it is unusual to link to external sites just for photographs. —Jeremy (talk) 14:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick check in town reveals that it is indeed the Sheaf; the large two-tunnel entrance in one of the later photos is the point where it surfaces near Ponds Forge (google maps view) --VinceBowdren 16:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Buried River Sheaf? 

message: More information needs copying from the Sheaf & Porter Trust website.
However, I am very unfamiliar with wikipedia.
Some content needed:
- Pictures of the famous megatron culvert and it's reason for existing. (Used to carry Trams on exchange street over the river).
- More about SPRT and the project is has planned along the River Sheaf.
- More about the Sheaf Wheels and River Sheaf Walks.
Add pictures and route map.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.123.91 (talk) 14:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More updates required. 
Talk:Ford Racing (series)

message: I don't see why the notability tag has been left on this article for so long. Major improvements have been made to this article since the first time I saw it. Plus now two sources on listed in the external links. If someone can tell me why the notability tag should be left on please tell me on my talk page. Xtreme racer 21:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "importance" tag. Notability seems to be established through external links (reviews of the game). If someone objects, please add the "notability" tag. Sorted as part of the Notability Wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I think this page should be moved to a location with a (Video game) or (Playstation game) or whatever the appropriate identifier is after it, and Ford Racing itself direct to a page on the Ford Company's Racing programs.  Probably using some of the content on the current Ford page, and it can certainly reference this game, and the others that use the Ford moniker.  FrozenPurpleCube 09:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this page 

message: We should seriously consider to merge this article with Ford Racing 3 and and rename it Ford Racing (series). The reason why is because it would make it a decent article, and because the Ford Racing 2 article is missing. 1yodsyo1 15:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Could somebody add a "Critical reception" section please, summarising reviewers' judgements? 86.135.115.218 (talk) 22:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception?