lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Phoebe Snetsinger

message: Doing a simple google search of Phoebe Snetsinger comes up with some good sources to references, which could easily improve this article. Such as:
 If someone is willing to check these out. Bossplw (talk) 23:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The first article is quite useful. The second one is presently a dead link. Ah, I see, another editor found the title, but still uses the same dead link. Here is the new link to the review of a book about her,   --Prairieplant (talk) 09:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Some new sentences added from Frank Thomas Jr article, and many sentences cited to the obituary in the New York Times. Does anyone have either her autobiography or the biography by Olivia Gentile? Her story seems rather dramatic. --Prairieplant (talk) 11:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement

message: Note that her life list has recently been surpassed by Tom Gullick of the UK.  --Anshelm '77 22:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be nice to have this source; it is a dead link now. Can you find it again and work it into the article ?  --Prairieplant (talk) 11:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Life-list

message: Phoebe Snetsinger became the focus of Google Doodle on June 9, 2016. There have been multiple vandalisms related. Someone should protect it for 24 hours.  --Ra4king (talk) 08:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Can IP addresses be blocked? Facts are being altered willy nilly, statements changed to the source no longer backs them up. --Prairieplant (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you  for the temporary block due to vandalism.  --Prairieplant (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism due to Google Doodle 

message: added the date of birth on July 16, 2006, having found it in Snetsinger's Social Security Death Index (SSDI) record. I am not sure how to use the SSDI in a citation on Wikipedia. I usually find those via Ancestry for members of my own family and do not use Ancestry located data in Wikipedia articles as one must be a member to use Ancestry. There may be other ways to reach the SSDI records. I consider SSDI to be a reliable source of information, that is not the issue. I see that others copy what is here in Wikipedia. If anyone has experience with this, please do help, to get rid of the citation needed after Phoebe Snetsinger's date of birth.  --Prairieplant (talk) 05:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  source for her date of birth
Talk:Bishopstone, Buckinghamshire

message: I thought the Bishop in Bishopstone (Bucks) referred to the Bishop of Bayeux. I remember reading (somewhere) that the Bishop owned a large amount of land south of Stone, and hence it was known as "Bishop's Stone".
Rbirkby 22:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bradford College

message: refs and pics please Victuallers 08:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have applied the 'advert' template, because the page currently reads like an advert. 
The introductory section is all right, though 'hundreds of' is hardly encyclopaedic in tone. But the 'History' section is almost entirely puff: it gives no dates, names no important indivduals, and in fact contains hardly any history. Sections on organisation, funding, and buildings would be appropriate. 
ColinFine 22:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert

message: I've re-written parts of the article to sound less like it was written by the college marketing department. The whole article still needs a lot of work, especially the history section which is lacking references and is a glorified list of bullet points.
In the interests of full transparency, I work for the university next door which technically competes with the college, but I've tried to be fair when writing the article. Please edit it if you think it shows bias. NRTurner (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: If there is such a person as Steven P. Taylor and they are notable please provide a reference. -- Q Chris (talk) 19:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, no reference, not appearing on Google - He's gone! -- Q Chris (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Dolphin Island (novel)

message: You need to have a page on the Dolphin Island adjacent to Karratha, Western Australia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.213.106 (talk) 12:27, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dolphin Island adjacent to Karratha, Western Australia

message: There is a move request at Talk:Dolphin Island (disambiguation)#Requested move that would affect the Dolphin Island redirect to this page.  Please discuss the move there.  Powers T 13:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important move request
Talk:The Sands of Mars

message: i am disappointed that squeak does not get a mention 212.56.120.244 (talk) 15:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that the pet Martian?  If so, add the creature.--GwydionM (talk) 20:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: squeek

message: "The Sands of Mars was Clarke's first published novel."
wasn't "Prelude to Space" earlier?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E1:23E0:3600:1968:27B:53A4:AF28 (talk) 18:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: the first novel

message: Article states, "The book has given an inspiration for the title of guitarist Jimi Hendrix's last and unfinished album, First Rays of the New Rising Sun. The album also contains an unfinished song "New Rising Sun" in which 'Jupiter Sun' is mentioned."
This paragraph appears to be speculation.  If it cannot be made non-speculative, it should be deleted.  
• The phrase "first light of the rising sun" appears in _Sands of Mars_, but is commonplace in English (as an Internet search for exact phrase match confirms). It is therefore not distinctive enough to justify the claim that its use in _The Sands of Mars_ is the inspiration for the Hendrix title.  Nor is any biographical reference given to justify the claim.
• How is the Hendrix phrase "Jupiter Sun" supposed to be relevant to _The Sands of Mars_?  Clarke wrote of an artificial sun appearing in Jupiter orbit in _2001: Odyssey Two_ ('82), but that book's publication postdates Hendrix's death by ~12 years.  The artificial sun of _The Sands of Mars_ appears in Mars orbit, not Jupiter orbit, and there is no discussion in _The Sands of Mars_ of creating an artificial sun around Jupiter.   The mere use by Hendrix of the phrase "Jupiter Sun" is not specific enough, in any case, to prove that he was referring to Clarke's fiction even if that were chronologically possible:.
: Your points are valid, thanks.  I am no Hendrix fan and did not write that bit.  I added the need for a citation.
: For Jupiter, he re-used the idea in 2010: Odyssey Two.  I assume this is what the reference means.  --GwydionM (talk) 09:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is reference for Jimi Hendrix claim?
Talk:Church of Cognizance

message: ------
This article needs some cleanup to avoid sounding like a recruitment brochure. It should also be noted that this is a very significant article as the Quaintances are currently being prosecuted in a major test of the religious rights restoration act to the sacramental use of cannabis. I will try to add to this article as time permits. Whig 23:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Leopard (heraldry)

message: I've never come across the terms lioned leopard and leoparded lion in English.  Have you?  —Tamfang 05:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  let the French keep it 

message: Worth mentioning Normandy? Or Wales? or are these lions? --Henrygb 01:27, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tongue-firmly-in-cheek mode: They look like leopards. Suedois 20:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

text: PS funny to think that some English call their logo as lion, when they should be calling it leopard. Nice to think about famous "three leopards of England". Of course neither is an indigeneous animal there.  Suedois 20:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  How do you tell the difference?  —Tamfang 05:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other examples 

message: In English, leopard now refers to the natural animal, that is Panthera pardus. 71.194.44.209 (talk) 16:40, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  change in use 

message: While I would agree that this article as it currently exists needs a complete rewrite, I don't think simply deleting it is the best approach.  It duplicates (poorly) part of the content of Lion (heraldry) (see the section Lions vs. Leopards), and I can vouch that the term leopard does appear in Anglophonic heraldry, though its precise meaning was sometimes unclear and has changed over the years.  I would like to see Wikipedia's coverage of this particular subject expanded and clarified, using high quality reliable sources, and I see two ways to accomplish this: 1) to merge this article into a section within the Lion (heraldry) article and leave a redirect from here to there; 2) to split the leopard information from that article to this one, leaving a "main article" hatnote in that section to lead readers to this article.  The first approach may be the easiest and most appropriate at this time, but I think the latter would better serve the reader in the long term (imho).  This would allow inclusion of actual examples from historical rolls, along with a full explanation of the term's evolution throughout heraldic history, without further bogging down the lion article. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 04:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure there is very much information on this topic. Although, the current usage of the word is quite clear. The only authority that refers to lion passant guardant as leopards is the Canadian Heraldic Authority, and it only does it in the French section of its bilingual grants. Tinynanorobots (talk) 19:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or split?
Talk:Earthlight

message: I've removed the claim that the three stories take place in a single future, because I think it's wrong.  I've added one reason to the article - Earthlight should come last if it is a single future.  But The Sands of Mars include a significant discovery on Mars and also a significant event near it.  Neither of these are mentioned in Earthlight.--GwydionM 17:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three visions or one? 

message: My copy (1977 paperback) says the copyright is 1935 yet it also lists the first edition as 1955. What's the deal? What do we want to report in Wiki? FusionKnight 00:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarke was born in 1917, so 1935 is very early.  Possibly it is something he wrote as a teenager and then rewrote and expanded 20 years later.  Worth looking into, but meantime the entry should stand.--GwydionM 17:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I added the Tuck reference which lists the first publication of the novel as 1955 and also states that the novel is an expansion of a story which first appeared in the August, 1951 issue of Thrilling Wonder Stories.--Rtrace 16:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Date 

message: The article states "The story describes regions of heavy metal resources concentrated in certain areas beneath some of the Lunar maria. This anticipates the later discovery of mass concentrations or Mascons, by surveys of the Moon carried out prior to the Apollo landings by the Lunar Orbiter missions."  This is sort of on the right track, but my objection is that I think that no one ever claimed that the mascons are caused by heavy metal deposits, at least not the type we have on earth with distinct veins of ore.  They are probably caused by rebound of the surface after a giant impact, which pulls denser mantle materials closer to the surface.  The mascons are nearly always centered on impact basins, but not necessarily on maria, which have different origins despite their usual colocation. Jstuby (talk) 16:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mascons
Talk:Igor Giorgadze

message: This article is heavily biased and leans on rumors and defamatory statements. It entirely omits Igor Giorgadze´s side of the story and does not and has never used even a single quote by him even though it contains a four line quote by Mikhail Saakashvili regarding the detention of 12 opposition members representing five different parties; the Mikhail Saakashvili quote only proves the fact that the defendants have been denied the right to a fair trial and presumtion of innocence since that statement was made on the same day of the arrest. There is no mention of the fact that the trial was closed and evidence less then convincing.
Furthermore, some registered (Georgian) users insisted on using the word ´criminal´ which is pure libel especially since Giorgadze has no criminal record.
With regard to the ¨assasinatino attempt¨ on Edward Shevardnadze, an attempt to insert the fact that on several occasions Shevardnaze refuted those allegation which connected Giorgadze to the August 29 attack was removed.
Any attempt to introduce another side of the story is constatly stifled, sources used are also biased especially the first one which merely mentions Giorgadze in an article devoted to a different topic, a Shevardnadze era article in which Giorgadze is refered to an ¨international terrorist¨ can clearly not be used as a source let alone taken seriously as an ¨attempted assasination¨ allegation within the Georgian borders does not make an individual an ¨international terrorist¨.
I suggest that until this article is edited objectively presenting both sides of the story, it carries a neutrality tag.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.174.123.7 (talk) 09:36, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Iosif Constantin Drăgan

message: I have reverted whitewashing. See Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. Especially germane is WP:PAID, since DEF from the username might mean Drăgan European Foundation. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitewashing
Talk:Fields of Anfield Road

message: I have added the merge templates to this article and the Liverpool FC article because I do not believe that this chant possesses sufficient notability on its own for inclusion in Wikipedia. I see that the FC article is already a long article, but I would suggest that this means substantial parts of that article should be separated out for inclusion in sub-articles. When this happens, I believe there will be room to appropriately cover this chant in the main article. In the spirit of collaboration that we should all abide by, I would love to hear comment from other editors. Erechtheus 23:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus on the LFC page seems to be that there's no basis for a merger, the issue - a seperate one - is rather whether this article should be AfD. The LFC article is currently up for a GA nomination, and the tag will damage its chances. This song is already mentioned in the article, at present there's not much more that can be done. I will remove the merger tag. Eixo 10:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Liverpool FC]] discussion
Talk:Ivana Markova

message: This is not a complete list of publications of Markova but is simply those that I can find from a fairly rudimentary search on the internet.  Judging by her age, I assume she has been publishing since well before the 1990's which is when my list of publications begins...  Please feel free to add additional materials to enhance this posting... Stevenmitchell 19:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Publications 
Talk:J. C. D. Clark

message: The user known as HJ2B=! keeps on removing properly footnooted material from the article. If the material is "untrue and defamatory material", please present some evidence of this from a properly secondary source that establishes the so-called "personal animus of Ronald Hutton". Ronald Hutton is a historian, and if I understand the rules of Wikipedia correctly, we are supposed to follow the experts, not start deleting material that is properly cited to a proper source on the grounds that somebody happens to proclaim it to be untrue. The material from Hutton should only be removed if is widely established that he is not a good source. --A.S. Brown (talk) 23:38, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ronald Hutton

message: Someone added a third e to the word "degree" in the intro paragraph.  A fix would be nice. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 22:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done  RudolfRed (talk) 01:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling fix request: "degreee" 

message: I was a member of the Cambridge History Faculty at the time that this supposed letter censuring Clark was written.  I never heard of any such letter, and a fortiori did not sign it.  The very least I can say, therefore, is that there was no letter signed by everyone in the Faculty.  Furthermore, I do not believe any such letter existed, and cannot imagine where Ronald Hutton got the information from.  However popular such collective letters may have become in recent years, they were certainly not common in the past, and to do something like this was certainly not the style of the History Faculty then.80.5.131.26 (talk) 16:15, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Understandably, claims involving personal narratives are difficult to substantiate and therefore are not typically added to articles without corroborating sources. Regards,  Spintendo  20:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 14 February 2020
Talk:Het Schip

message: I have just added significantly to this page (added all the historical background section) and backed up my additions with a good amount of sources I think. Therefore I removed the stub tags and think that WikiProject Museums, WikiProject Architecture, and WikiProject Netherlands should no longer categorize this article as a stub either.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Acire93  (talk • contribs) 13 June 2014 (UTC)
:Done.-ELEKHHT 21:03, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Move up from stub class
Talk:Ja'Warren Hooker

message: This article needs major editing. Height and weight are trivial. Headings are used incorrectly and information is quite out of order. -- Psychless 03:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The paragraph about his girlfriend's death is out of place, not relevant, and not encyclopedic for a BLP. I'm going to remove it as I go through and copy edit this article. Gravel for breakfast (talk) 17:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph about girlfriend's death
Talk:Jacqueline White

message: Why is this article in part, a replica of the IMDB page on Jacqueline White?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.155.241.174 (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDB gives her date of birth as November 23, 1922. I believe the Wikipedia article gives the correct date, though I cannot be certain.  Kostaki mou (talk) 05:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  White claims to have been born 2 years later, in 1924, though.Western Clippings - Jacqueline White interview.Radiohist (talk) 15:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I found her birth record on FamilySearch. She was definitely born in 1922, but it can't be used as that would be OR (primary source) and a BLP violation. OscarL 23:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: IMDB
Talk:Biceps (disambiguation)

message: Is it necessary for this to be a disambiguation page? The article says the biceps femoris meaning is less common than Biceps brachii muscle. Wmahan. 23:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation necessary?

message: I'm inclined to think the section on exercises ought to be made a separate article, with a link from this article.  At biceps brachii muscle there are links to articles on several exercises; the new article should link to those and vice versa. Michael Hardy 23:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...in fact, I notice that this is labelled a disamibiguation page.  The "exercises" section is clearly inappropriate for a disambiguation page. Michael Hardy 23:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exercises 

message: Biceps (disambiguation) currently redirects to this page (Biceps) which is a disambiguation page.
I would like to propose Biceps to redirect to Biceps brachii muscle as this page has over 26433 views this month, whereas the other two pages on the disambiguation page, Biceps femoris muscle and Biceps (prosody), have only 8449 & 270 (respectively). Biceps brachii muscle would of course link to the new disambiguation page at Biceps (disambiguation) using a  template. Captain n00dle T/C 00:11, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Replace page with Redirect to [[Biceps brachii muscle]]
Talk:James Lafferty

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 23:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: What idiot wrong that at the end of his bio? It has nothing to do with his acting career or personal life & cheapens the entire source. EDITED & DELETED. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Carbine222 (talk • contribs) 07:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He's beautiful" 

message: I'm taking this as a clean up project for myself. What I really need somebody to do is place some pictures on this artcle. I'm not good at uploading picture because they soon get deleted for copyright reasons. Can somebody do this?
I added the picture from the Nathan Scott article. It was already uploaded to Wikipedia, so I just added it to his page. CollisionCourse (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up (Picture?)
Talk:IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line

message: The history section - aside from needing a general rewrite -- doesn't make any mention of the effects of 9/11 on this line, despite the fact that the article Closings and cancellations following the September 11, 2001 attacks singles it out and links to it. 23skidoo 23:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in 1 (New York City Subway service), probably a better home for it. I do realize that this creates an inconsistency with the 9/11 article referenced above. Marc Shepherd 02:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 9/11 reference?

message: Which modern subway line does this explosion belong to?  Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: IRT Lexington Avenue Line. Mysteryman557 (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Should have brought it up on the Wikipedia talk:NYCPT instead. Epicgenius (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1902 explosion 

message: I just found this picture from Lower Manhattan in 1982(http://oldnewyork.tumblr.com/post/67743668210/retronewyork-new-york-city-subway-station), which is clearly along the Broadway-7th Avenue Line. It has the old pre-Helvetica signage and for some reason also boasts a connection to the IRT White Plains Road Line and "Bronx Park," probably Bronx Park East (IRT White Plains Road Line) if anything. Does anybody have a clue where this picture was taken? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  20:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is old but apparently this is the 18th Street station. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 15:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curious 1982 station image  