lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wank (mountain)

message: http://partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1468 -- 04:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL, fantastic. — Matt Crypto 07:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Link removed for reasons stated in edit summary. Weedier Mickey (talk) 23:49, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comic Wank

message: * Wankers Corner -- which is another placename of German origin, & often mispronounced. -- llywrch (talk) 20:08, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? What relationship does the place in Oregon have with the mountain? Wikipeterproject (talk) 13:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested see also link 

message: Someone, please protect this. All the vandalism in the past is really bad. Thanks. Shikku27316 (talk) 13:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There have been very few edits to the article recently, so not sure why you feel it needs protection now. Wikipeterproject (talk) 05:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I just found it. I looked at the history, and it really needs to be protected. --Shikku27316 (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure you saw on the page's history that made you think that. The page has been rather stable for quite some time. Wikipeterproject (talk) 07:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wank_(mountain)&diff=next&oldid=389416402 This made me very uncomfortable, and so did many others. It wouldn't hurt.bShikku27316 (talk) 08:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That was in 2010! No need to react on that now, almost three years later!! Wikipeterproject (talk) 08:34, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I know. It just really bothered me. Shikku27316 (talk) 04:49, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protect? 

message: Should a reference be made in the article to the amusing English interpretation of the mountain’s name? 86.133.243.146 (talk) 01:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not come across this. Give me a moment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.61.83 (talk) 16:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular culture
Talk:Filles de Kilimanjaro

message: I've removed the "also known as" claim, because it doesn't seem to have ever been known as "Women/Girls of Kilimanjaro" - that's the translation from the French and it's often appended to the name.  I've also removed the claim that it was the first ever use of the electric piano on one of Miles's albums - one of the tracks on Miles in the Sky also uses Fender Rhodes.  --Andrew Norman 15:08, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just consulted Szwed's biography. Evans was indeed involved, and "Mademoiselle Mabry" is his re-working of "The Wind Cries Mary." -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 04:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dajti

message: Like with Lura, the main point of this article is the national park, not the mountain. Really they should have two separate articles or the mountain should be a section of the park's own pageSpyenson (talk) 13:59, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change Request 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.dajtiekspres.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=90&Itemid=159&lang=en. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mega Man III

message: Mega Man 3 was not the first game to have a character from a previous game to make a cameo. Gutsman from Mega Man (1) returns, albeit in a very different form as a fortress boss in Mega Man 2.
:I completely forgot about the Gutsdozer. I guess that line should be taken out then. --Vile Requiem 7 July 2005 19:25 (UTC)
This happens quite frequently in the series, doesn't it?  "Guts Man" seems to be the boss that returns a lot Robot Master-wise since I guess the Doc favored him the most, but "boss" wise you also see the Yellow Devil/Green Devil on numerous occassions too!  "Guts Man" has appeared in MM2, MM3, and MM7 as well as MM, right? --Yahweh 04:10, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Cameos 

message: That's what's on the box, after all.  The NES games use Arabic numerals; the Game Boy games use Roman numerals.  It would prevent confusion, that's for sure. StarryEyes 13:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be moved to Mega Man 3?
Talk:Philosophy of sex

message: sexual ethics was redirected to sexual norms which I didn't feel was appropriate, so I was bold and made a new page. Perhaps someone here would be interested in editing that page since currently it's wildly POV(mine)? I really don't know much about the topic and need some help. User:Lynden Price 21:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Invite to [[sexual ethics]]

message: I wrote to my old friend Alan Soble (whom I hadn't chatted with for years, so this was a good excuse) about using his excellent article over at the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy as a source text for the WP article.  He was tentatively positive about that idea, but thought he might have something else more recent to use instead; I'll know in a few days.  Obviously, if we use anything of Soble's, we'll need him to release it as PD or GFDL, but I've mentioned that to him. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 20:15, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Lulu, you unapologetic name-dropper; Brilliant! Banno 20:52, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Likely to get "athena birthed fully grown" 

message: A statement in the intro paragraph originally claimed that "contemporary philosophy of sex is rooted in western feminism". This is woefully ill-informed, and I have edited it accordingly. Consider, for instance, Thomas Nagel's 1979 essay "Sexual perversion", which is so far from being "rooted" in feminism that Nagel doesn't even see fit to reference it. Alan Soble (in <I>Pornography, Sex, and Feminism</I> and in the essay "Bad apples") has taken issue with alleged feminist scholarly exaggerations. There's also Soble's essay on masturbation and Alan Goldman's "Plain sex", which are rooted not in feminism but in classical conceptual analysis. John Finnis's natural law philosophy of sex (e.g. his essay "Natural law and unnatural acts") has nothing to do with feminism and everything to do with Aquinas. Paralipsis (talk) 05:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary philosophy of sex "rooted" in feminism? Says who?

message: The pulse/orgasm is needed to break up particle bonds and return to freedom source.
Sex pulses the body from the outside, involution. 
Meditation pulses the body from the inside, evolution.
Pulse/orgasm is needed for life. If you skip meditation. Sex is required for life.
The emotions require a pulse/orgasm to stay alive. 
The mind requires emotions to stay gounded.
ERCrawbeing (talk) 07:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Reasons for Sex 

message: The further reading list is much too long. I propose to cut it back only to the most useful items, overviews of the subject, etc. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 09:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this post is more than four years old, but I agree, the further reading list is too large and should be culled. It looks like it's the same list as the References and Further Reading section of the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy page on Philosophy of Sexuality. Ianjosepht (talk) 03:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading
Category talk:University stubs

message: Where should institutions in Puerto Rico belong? They are tagged with  or , or simply , or even . — Instantnood 18:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Puerto Rico

message: Re recent edits by user:Huaiwei and user:SchmuckyTheCat  - Mainland China, Hong Kong and Macao are, for many purposes, different parts of the People's Republic of China. Education policies and regulations, like many other matters, are three administrations within the People's Republic of China - the education ministry in Beijing is responsible only for mainland China. Hong Kong and Macao are usually listed or grouped together with countries. — Instantnood 19:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hong Kong, mainland China
Category talk:School stubs

message: There seems to be some confusion between school-stub and edu-stub, possibly because Americans use "school" in a much wider sense than British (and perhaps other) people do.
Are there any rules for this?
--PeterR 08:29, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For everyones information, I have just created two new stubs and categories for Australian () and Canadian schools (). Please use these stubs where appropriate instead of the standard school stub. Thank you -- Ianblair23 11:19, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New schools stubs 

message: You voted for Lee Smith (baseball), this week's Collaboration of the week.  Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.
:Huh? Salad Days 03:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  COTW Project
Talk:Rhythmic mode

message: The ordo and thus the durational value of specific notes were indicated by ligature groupings and the mode. The article needs some explination of the ligature system and ordines, and mention of fractio modi and extensio modi. Hyacinth 08:35, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup request

message: Ordo redirects to this page. However, I was looking for a different kind of Ordo (liturgical device). 
ramakesava 11:30, 2 October 2006 (GMT+1)
:I have changed ordo into a disambiguation page, as this is unlikely to be the most common usage. I don't know what this device is, but please add it to the disambiguation page if it appears in an article (or create an article for it if it doesn't). Rigadoun  (talk) 15:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: In all modesty, I have removed the banner calling for an expert to clean up this article, and have set to work doing so.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 01:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for having dropped the ball, now a year and a half ago. I'm still here, and have just made some changes which I hope will address your concerns. However, it would be helpful if you could be a bit more specific about what is needed. It seems to me that expert help in the subject is less needed than a good cleanup of the article structure and language. I also note your other request for more examples, and I agree that this would be helpful—especially an example or two of what the medieval notation looks like.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 04:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert help
Talk:Bajo Cinca/Baix Cinca

message: Baix Cinca is an Aragonese comarca that was never politically Catalan. In the middle ages the border between Aragon an Catalonia was not well defined and changed several times, but that does not mean that this comarca is Catalan, just as it doesn't mean that Lérida/Lleida is Aragonese.
The fact of treating this comarca as Catalan is politically driven, and has more to do with Catalan nationalistic movement and "pancatalanism". Actualy the only reason to include Baix Cinca into the Catalan comarcas is that they speak a dialect of the Catalan language. --Ecelan 08:42, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/archive7

message: As Eric Morecambe noted, you can tell when the cricket season has started by the sound of leather hitting Brian Close - jguk 06:33, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Brian Close]]

message: Due to his contemporaries calling him a dunce - Allen3 14:22, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
# Allen3 14:22, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
# Geogre 00:34, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Colley_Cibber]]

message: Leave it up to Raul's judgment to pick a standard article, without any particular accounting for it being April Fools' Day (is this a valid option? consider it like an "against all" option in a vote...there should be some way to reject the general idea of giving special preference for a certain day in a certain culture, especially when that day is associated with the decidedly unencyclopedic notion of playing jokes on people). (Note - this is fine by me - →Raul654 08:33, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)) 
#Everyking 07:19, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: No special article

message: DUMBASS ACADEMIC BASTARDS BLOCK TIME CUBE DEBATE BECAUSE OF EVIL WORD LEARNING.  Vote for nature's harmonic simultaneous 4-day, the only thing that can save humanity from self-destruction.
# Ryanaxp 05:42, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
# My description was: "Let's enlighten Wikipedia users with Cubic truth! You can also vote for Time Cube at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates.". I would like to know why Raul654 reverted my edit. 211.28.24.166 05:50, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Time Cube]]

message: A rather serious look at what many would consider an unserious topic.  An April Fools double-fake, an anti-April Fools that demonstrates the real scholarship that can go into a silly-sounding topic in an encyclopedia edited by volunteers.  Read this featured article and see what I mean.  And look at the picture, a great image for the main page as the perfect counterpoint to the article's intellectual content.
# Pharos 04:05, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Kitsch]]

message: Let's do something productive instead of just arguing: can someone draft a blurb for ETPH here?  Its "Recently featured:" list and the three links in the lower-right should be modified so that they link to more... appropriate places.  Then at least we can discuss what we want to do with it more concretely.
Someone should also create a "Featured Article for April 1, 2005" banner template that we could stick at the top and bottom of the article... and ETPH itself could use a more extensive "See also" section.
+sj + 18:56, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Article blurb for ETPH
Talk:George Kingsley Zipf

message: are you sure about the phonetic transcription of his name? i would have exptected it to be /zIpf/, with a /p/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.249.187 (talk) 23:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anybody add some more information about his personal life?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leotolstoy (talk • contribs) 2006-11-09 20:17 (UTC)
:Zipf Dies After 3 - Month Illness [The Harvard Crimson; September 27, 1950]. -- ToE 14:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal information
Talk:Andy Hui

message: I believe this artical has negative overtones and is not written in a way that is fair and unbiased. Andy Hui is dogmatically said to have limited vocal ability and that his songs are "forgettable". Revision is needed.
I agree with the comment above regarding the excessively negative remarks of this artiste.I have revised the work and have deleted the biased reviews.
-Arthur Oon
I think the NPOV issues have been addressed, so I've removed the NPOV tag.--JSIN 09:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Günzburg

message: *I think the section starting "When, early in the emancipation period, the Jews of Russia and of Austria were ordered by their governments to adopt family names" etc. is interesting, as it is connected to the history of the town. But the part on "Ulma-Günzburg" etc is only interesting if the family is well-known. Saintswithin 10:57, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Genealogy section relevant?

message: *Article: :de:Günzburg
*Corresponding English-language article: Günzburg
*Worth doing because: broaden people's knowledge.
* Originally Requested by:--Sheynhertz-Unbayg 14:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation details

message: Günzburg
A town in Germany. Introductory paragraph is in German.FreplySpang 06:43, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Details from [[Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English]]
Talk:Jäger

message: Hello,
I landed on this DAB page while looking for jaegers (the seabirds).  I hunted and found the birds I was looking for under Arctic Skua.  DAB pages have their uses but along the way, numerous articles about Jager/Jäger/Jaeger/Yeager/etc have been turned into redirects which direct to this DAB page.  I'm not sure how many articles that fell victim to Redirect Rabies have no links to them (I haven't tried counting).   In the meantime, I'm adding a link to Skua so my fellow North Americans can find the birds. Jaguara (talk) 18:43, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems like a good idea, go ahead. -- Matthead  Discuß   23:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, done. Thanks! Moonraker12 (talk) 12:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overzealous redirection? 

message: There seem far too many terms here to make it easy to disambiguate the word. If there are no objections I'll move the military terms to a List of Jäger units; that'll move about 30 items. Moonraker12 (talk) 22:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems like a good idea, go ahead. -- Matthead  Discuß   23:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, done. Thanks! Moonraker12 (talk) 12:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clutter?
Talk:HMS P311

message: HMS P.311 → HMS P311. For consistency with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships) as discussed at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships)#Royal Navy submarines with no name. Gdr 11:32, 2005 Apr 2 (UTC)
::Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation and sign your vote with ~~~~ 
* Support --Philip Baird Shearer 13:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add any additional comments
This discussion has already happened at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships)#Royal Navy submarines with no name. The move is a techical problem because of an edit history on the target page HMS P311 which is a redirect page to HMS P.311 Philip Baird Shearer 13:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: All page histories should be kept.  I'll merge it in when it's technically possible again, but for now I've done the move. violet/riga (t) 22:40, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: I've finished merging the page history; the history is now fully reconstructed. No more cut-and-paste moves, everyone! Noel (talk) 01:43, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: ::Add any additional comments
This discussion has already happened at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships)#Royal Navy submarines with no name. The move is a techical problem because of an edit history on the target page HMS P311 which is a redirect page to HMS P.311 Philip Baird Shearer 13:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: All page histories should be kept.  I'll merge it in when it's technically possible again, but for now I've done the move. violet/riga (t) 22:40, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: I've finished merging the page history; the history is now fully reconstructed. No more cut-and-paste moves, everyone! Noel (talk) 01:43, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: RN said to be recovering the wreck, but nothing four years later? Little grape (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recovered yet?
Talk:Attenuation length

message: This is an interesting piece indeed.  I was an electronics technician in the USAF many years ago, but I have never heard of that before.
--TracyRenee 11:48, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: At least for X-rays I have understood it as beeing synonymous with penetration depth. From these two articles it seems like penetration depth is only used for electromagnetic radiation while attenuation length does not have this restriction and could be used with other particles also. In most cases I don't think that generalization would work as easily as it is presented here. Other particles than photons usually do not follow the Beer-Lambert law (see e.g. Particle therapy). My suggestion is thus a merge with the penetration depth article. As it looks now that would mean turning this article into a redirect and mention attenuation length as a synonym in the penetration depth article. Any thoughts on this? Ulflund (talk) 20:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Dynamically typed

message: Should be renamed to "dynamic typing". And there should be a static typing article! Wouter Lievens 12:18, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. But I think that what also needs to be considered is the Datatype page. That page has a fairly large section dealing with type checking, and it probably doesn't belong there. So as the dynamic and static typing pages expand, that page needs to be considered for editing. --seliopou 20:00, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely; I have a similar remark on that talk page IIRC. Wouter Lievens 20:10, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:Wellington Province

message: To obtain the 2001 population figure I believe I could have searched for the Wellington Statistical Area, although I haven't seen figures for Statistical Areas in a while, they may no longer be produced. Anyway the area of the old Wellington Province is:
*all of Wellington Region
*all of Wanganui District, Manawatu District, Palmerston North District and Horowhenua District 
*all of Rangitikei District except Ngamatea area unit
*from Taupo District: Rangipo and Te More area units
*from Ruapehu District: Ohakune, Raetihi, Waiouru, Raurimu, National Park and Tangiwai area units 
*from South Taranaki District: Waverley, Waitotara, Makakaho area units
*from Tararua District: Pahiatua, Eketahuna, Owahanga, Mangatainoka, Nireaha-Tiraumea area units 
*Oceanic-Manawatu-Wanganui Region and Oceanic-Tararua Constituency area units (no population)
Ben Arnold 12:41, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Population Figure