lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eisregen

message: In its first or second paragraph, this article links to the disambiguation page for "index" (The actual text was "...causing the indexing of two of their albums..". This shouldn't happen. however, i didn't know what type of indexing the text was referring to, so I didn't edit it. could somebody who knows please edit it to link to the specific page for that kind of index? E946 06:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It refers to a special kind of german censorship, the Indizierung, meaning that by decision of the Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Medien, you cannot advertise the product, nor sell it to minors. I don't believe the english wikipedia has an article on that topic, yet. Also, the german wikipedia article claims that the album Krebskolonie has not merely been put on the index, but also on the list of media that cannot be publically played at all in Germany. I find this doubtful, as I know of no legal reference that would back this up, but it might be worth doing research on. --84.137.29.176 03:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to a disambiguation page 

message: To say, that Eisregen plays black metal is terribly wrong. I've seen them about 10 times live on stage. And it's not black metal. Dark Metal would (in my oppinnion) be far more correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SonOfOden (talk • contribs) 15:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Genere
Talk:Lathe (county subdivision)

message: This article is not particularly useful without a map showing exactly where each lathe was, since the names themselves do not give much of a clue. In addition I'm unsure why the older names are not red-lettered; or alternatively, why the newer ones are!
I am sure there is someone who can supply the map ... Peter Shearan 07:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map required!
Talk:Personal advertisement

message: Not sure if any article watchers are still active; just notifying that I intend to rewrite this article, with more emphasis on history of personal ads and sociological views. I've started gathering sources here. (The single ref in the current article will not be used in the rewrite.) Schazjmd (talk) 23:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned rewrite 

message: Some sentences in this article are identical to sentences in :Mail-order bride. As I was writing this article, there was content that also was applicable to the other, and I copied my work there. Schazjmd (talk) 00:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution 

message: Indian 115.164.45.174 (talk) 07:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hlow
Talk:Triple Intervention

message: *I'm not sure whether there is any good purpose for elaborating upon the topic (beyond the referral of the reader to the expanded Treaty of Shimonoseki article, save historical completness in the form of blow by blow negotiations and personalities.  It strikes me as a matter best left to an in depth book rather than a encyclopedia article.  None-the-less, I did not remove the stubs from the text... actually I put them back -- so I WAS tempted! Fabartus 19:48, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A Change not made
Talk:Standard Oil of Ohio

message: This brings back many memories,  I started with Sohio, Oct 4, 1971 in Cincinnati, Ohio 930 Tennessee Ave. Heat oil #2 was 17.9c/gal while Kerosene was 18.9c/gal
Jim Johnson
IST Oil Americas
Back in 1991, when going to Cedar Point, I had noticed "What happened to all the Sohio stations?", noticing that they all converted to the gold and green BP stations.  I noticed the same with a couple of Boron stations in Michigan.  Other Boron stations switched to other brands like Marathon.
I remember going to Florida with my high school band, and one of my classmates said "What is So-hee-oh" as we were going through Ohio, and I told him the correct pronounciation, and that that's (was) the most prominent brand of gasoline in Ohio, along with Marathon.
Mark Pesci  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpesci7822 (talk • contribs) 08:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The actual name of Standard Oil as it operated in Ohio was The Standard Oil Company (Ohio), with the article "The" in italic script. Whenever the company name was spoken, it was always as "The Standard Oil Company", with an emphasis on the article "the". The company was never referred to as Standard Oil of Ohio. DavidFM48 (talk) 01:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporate Name 
Talk:List of minor characters in the StarCraft series

message: I've restructured the article into three categories, and with the help of Deckiller and the Clawed One, rewritten all current characters. However, this is still not a complete list. Characters, mainly from the authorised add-ons and the novels, still need to be included. A number of characters in the previous version of this article have not been included, but should be at some point. However, there are a couple of points regarding this: 
*Don't include characters who do not have any substantial information available to them. Colonel Hauler, Gui Montag and Morik are little more than names and aren't worth the space. Silendas is currently a name to which no information is available, so until a respectable amount of information is available she should remain a simple note in Artanis' section.
*Keep it in an out-of-universe persective and keep sections short. Long sections of prose simply aren't necessary for these characters. Try to keep it below three paragraphs. For obvious reasons, we don't want it written in an in-universe style.
*Please don't put in character infoboxes. They make the presentation of the article look rather bad, especially on widescreen monitors, and they aren't really needed and take up unnecessary file space.
In regards to notability, I believe this article should be treated as an extension of Characters of StarCraft. The only reason it is not included there is due to size constraints. From WP:NOTINHERITED: "Often, sub-articles are created for formatting and display purposes, however - this does not imply an "inherited notability" per se, but is often accepted in the context of ease of formatting and navigation." From WP:FICTION: "the sub-article should be viewed as an extension of the parent article, and judged as if it were still a section of that article [but] editors should still strive to provide real-world content."
For the convienence of dealing with the redone article, I've archived the previous discussion.
-- Sabre 16:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Restructure of article
Talk:Explanatory style

message: I was trying to figure out who marked the CAVE home page as a potentially unreliable source and why... it's maintained by the University of Pennsylvania... though it hasn't been updated since 1996 and looks weird today because it still looks like web sites looked in '96 (i.e. not very "professional" looking). But since I couldn't figure out why it was marked that way and assumed it was probably because of the unusual appearance of the page, I instead added another reference to a more modern-looking u-penn page with out-takes from several publications that mention CAVE. ike (talk) 01:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credible Source for CAVE 

message: Does any of the research work ever state that a pessimistic outlook is strongly correlated with "personal" and "negative" explanatory styles? Because I know plenty of very pessimistic people who tend to blame the external world for all their problems. In fact, it can be argued that the pessimist thinks the world itself is wrong, and therefore outside his control. Since my opinion is POV, I'll refrain from changing the article. But that assertion definitely needs referencing. 200.32.121.66 (talk) 17:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the article about Pessimism#Psychology contradicts the characterization in this article: "The study of pessimism has parallels with the study of depression. Psychologists trace pessimistic attitudes to emotional pain or even biology. Aaron Beck argues that depression is due to unrealistic negative views about the world." 200.32.121.66 (talk) 18:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pessimistic == personal and negative? Since when? 

message: The first sentence of this article says that attributional (or explanatory) style is used to explain how individuals explain events, either positive or negative  - but surely, one's attributional style may explain how people explain neutral events. Vorbee (talk) 16:53, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Attributional style
Talk:List of schools in Georgia (U.S. state)

message: Any opinions on how schools should be linked?? For example:
Is it logical to have a school called Washington High School named after George Washington to be linked:  Washington high school  ?? Georgia guy 20:06, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Links on schools

message: I corrected Harrison High School's name to Carl Harrison High School, which is its full name. I'd know, i attend school there. 68.158.208.172 02:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Harrison High

message: The page says it is a List of all schools in Georgia.  In reality isn't this a list of all High Schools in Georgia? --Mjrmtg 15:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: Any suggestions on adding school web sites? AGibson 16:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to school web sites

message: This page seems to be very close to being in violation of WP:NOT#DIR.  Wouldn't a category (or series of categories serve this purpose better by linking to actual articles instead of being a simple list? HDow (talk) 07:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose 
Talk:XR

message: XR can also mean eXchange Rate based on how it is used on some websites, e.g. XR calculator, XR data feeds, XR transactions, source: www.exchangerate.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.200.102.69 (talk • contribs) 20 h 09, 9 June 2005 (UTC)
: Somebody has added it. --Wisdood (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Tag team

message: In the "four corners tag team elimination match", is elimination wrestler-by-wrestler (if one wrestler is eliminated, his partner remains), or team-by-team (if one wrestler is eliminated, his partner is as well)? In other words, is it the same as a Tag Team Turmoil match (listed lower down as "tag team elimination match")?  — Gwalla | Talk 20:13, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag team elimination 

message: This is NOT what a blind tag is. A blind tag is when the partner on the apron tags in without the volition of the partner of the ring (usually a slap on the back), for the purposes of catching the opponent off-guard (since he didn't see the tag). I'm not sure what the scenario described above should be called, but it is most certainly not a blind tag. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article currently claims your definition is widely misused and you actually think about a self tag. It's unreferenced though (as most of the article). -Lwc (talk) 11:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blind tag
Talk:Thornborough Henges

message: I've created a new template for megalithic sites, Template:Megalith, as used on Pikestones and Round Loaf.  Some instructions on the template talk page, to show how to use it.  Cheers! --PopUpPirate 13:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Megalith

message: Hi, after today's changed, the Beltaine section still (mostly) has its old text. I might be wrong, but wouldn't it be good to change this too, so it no longer would say the henges are in private ownership? Cheers
Karl-Heinz Khzimmer (talk) 11:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: - A very fair point, which I’ve tried to address with an update. KJP1 (talk) 11:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: THX for that. The article is very cool. :) Khzimmer (talk) 11:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could you also update section "Beltaine"?
Talk:Marc Gunn

message: I submitted my biography last week and it now says there  is a copyright problem. Can you please explain? —the preceding unsigned comment is by 128.83.86.45 (talk • contribs) 2005-06-09 15:26:07  (UTC)
:When we see a new article that's word-for-word the same as an existing website, we assume it's plagiarized from that site and hence a copyright violation. I notice that the source () has a GFDL notice on it so I'll remove the copyvio notice. Writing an article about yourself is generally frowned on, though, see Wikipedia:Vanity page. Also, please capitalize article titles correctly when creating them. DopefishJustin (･∀･) 17:16, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
I think Marc is allowed to write the article about himself, as he is a minor celebrity. If Tom Petty submitted his own biography to the Wikpedia, would that be considered "vanity" ? Whotookthatguy 20:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While I know Marc is a real person, this seems to be largely self-promotional and in violation of the original research policy. chupacerveza 17:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, Wikipedia:Or#Citing_oneself does permit citing oneself, provided that the information has been properly published somewhere. The larger problem seems to be with WP:Autobiography. The guideline is to first publish the article somewhere in userspace, and then reach consensus vis-a-vis notability, and then publish it. - superβεεcat  05:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC: seems to violate "original research" policy
Talk:Leroy Jenkins (musician)

message: I recently posted a small disambiguation notice above the actual article to prevent people from actually vandalizing the page with that info. Someone should expand the World of Warcraft article to include more information on that. --XeroHedgehog 00:53, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: His character was possibly named after him, then again, leeroy Jenkins could ahve been named after the TV Evangelist of the same, simliar, name (LeRoy)... IronCrow (talk) 08:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:C-sharp major

message: I deleted this line: Béla Bartók's String Quartet No. 3 is one of the few in C sharp major. I've been trying to figure out this quartet, and while I can't claim to understand it very well I can say it definitely isn't in C#. There's no key signatures at all, and the harmony seems to be polymodal at best, and more in C than C# if anything.
Also, the line: Although most composers prefer to use the enharmonic equivalent D-flat major because it has just five flats as opposed to the seven sharps of C-sharp major, Johann Sebastian Bach actually chose C sharp major for Prelude and Fugue No. 3 in both books of the Well-Tempered Clavier. --this seems a bit misleading since Bach was working in Well temperament, in which D-flat major and C-sharp major are not enharmonic equivalents as far as I know. Given the form of the work and the tuning used, it should be not surprise that Bach used C-sharp major. This sentence gives the impression that it is surprising. If I get more time I'll see if I can phrase it better. Pfly 22:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bartok and Bach
Talk:Rangoli

message: The article sounds good but does contain lots of errors, incomplete sentences, bad wordings, etc. I have added few images and will try to get the text and edit when possible. In t correct the article.Thanks.27.61.56.253 (talk) 11:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the text that was added in July 2010 is a translation from the Hindi Wikipedia. The links to the original sources can be found there. Wiki-uk (talk) 15:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can find a Google translation here. Perhaps this helps. Wiki-uk (talk) 05:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

text: I copy edited a bit, but got bogged down because I'm not familiar with the subject.  I'm not sure how much a web translation helps--it looks like that's what happened to it in the first place.  What's really needed is for someone knowledgeable about the subject (or any one of the subjects, seems like the article tries to cover a bunch) to try to sort it out. It is an interesting, and attractive, topic, so maybe someone would like to become knowledgeable. All the readability in the world won't make it reliably sourced, of course. Richigi (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I took a stab at rewording. I did not include the Maharashtran info from IP 117.201... because I could not find any reliable descriptions. Please feel free to revert if you don't like the new wording, but it may be better to rewrite since the original was pretty unreadable. Also, I have no WP:RS for any of that. I simply used the existing (mangled) text and a horrifically-translated extract from the Hindi page to try for readability. Kevin.159.53 (talk) 18:43, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many mistakes

message: Okay, but what is Utswdhermita? Dlabtot (talk) 23:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rangoli's most important element is Utswdhermita." 

message: Write an sentence on Rangoli 2405:204:8505:D4A5:0:0:48E:28AC (talk) 16:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: Its related to rangoli and kolam.
Big drawing on the floor of a diety with color chalk or spices.
~~ Ed ~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:385D:683D:C8B4:4D38 (talk) 09:09, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kalamezhuthu
Template talk:HongKong-stub

message: Grr...sorry about that yall. The server errors keep on killing me. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 21:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If someone can fix this problem, please do so. For some reason, Wikipedia will not let me edit this template again, due to server problems. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 21:12, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: talk
Talk:Earned income tax credit

message: I was going to add a  template to the article as it was in the Taxation in the United States Category but it seems like it may be a global article, yet it starts with U.S.  If it is a global article, I would change the CAT to just Taxation and add the  template. Morphh  (talk) 2:13, 04 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Globalize or U.S.

message: What is the relevance of the table "Average incomes and taxes CBO Study 2009"?  Might be useful if earned income tax credit were actually included here, but it isn't.
Since this table does not have any clear connection to the article, I deleted it.
Michael-Zero (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average incomes and taxes CBO Study 2009

message: There are eight (8) commented-out sections in this article, only one of which appears to be a note to editors. Why are they there? I suggest that most such content should either be removed if it's truly extraneous (it's already invisible to readers!) or made into footnotes. Micler (talk) 17:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commented out content
Talk:Dodge Aries

message: I put a picture I had of my aunt's Plymouth Reliant up in this article as it's basically the same thing as a Dodge Aires.  I was thinking that way people would get an idea what an Aires looks like.  But if someone has a photo of an Aires, feel free to replace the Reliant photo with the Aires photo. 
JesseG 21:09, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
:Thanks, Jesster!  --SFoskett 01:53, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
::Uh oh, you're in biiiig trouble now. Now to track down a real aries. --matador300 22:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I own a 1981 Aries in great shape with a vinyl roof... Should I upload a pic of it? R Landgren 14:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Previously unsectioned comments

message: WP editors so far have dubbed the Aries and K as compact, but it had midsize room, and EPA also categorized it so. Need to reverse the colossal WP mistake of stating the Aries was replaced  by the teenie Shadow rather than the nearly identical, but slightly longer Spirit. Have fun and go with the flow, don't have a cow, man. Guy with the white hat.--matador300 22:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aries is now a midsize

message: Apolloboy removed a very nice, informative ad, and the gallery at the bottom.
What's up with the pictures? I believe they added a lot to it, and that you have decreased the information content and quality by deleting them? What's youre reasoning here? If you believe in a "cease fire" the ad was mine, though I will stand up for the gallery as well as you can clearly see the differences in generations with those pictures, including the cheap Audi 5000 styling theme on the 2nd generation. No sense in an edit war, but I request you put them back.
I will add a link to the ad if it is not replaced, I would use the gallery pictures in the text rather than as a gallery. --matador300 22:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not so fast at removing pictures 

message: I was surprised not to see any mention of the problem that Aries were famous for--stalling out in rainy or foggy weather.  I still occasionally hear this joke: "what do you get when you cross a Chrysler with a Mercedes?  An $80,000 car that stalls in the fog."  I know nothing about what caused this problem, though, so I can't tackle adding it.  But can someone confirm that this was a well-known issue? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Free-world (talk • contribs) 15:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalling Out in the Fog 

message: Like the cars themselves, this article is nearly identical to the Plymouth Reliant article. Mark Mentovai (talk) 02:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with [[Plymouth Reliant]]
Talk:Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children

message: To those who know and care:
The biggest questions I am left with on coming across this are "What body/organisation arranged this protocol"; "Who are the states who ratified this"; and "What enforcement measures were proposed as a result of this protocol (or is it just a waffle group)".
- Interesdom 21:21, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Big questions in 2005

message: This article says that there are two Palermo Protocols, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palermo_protocols says there are three!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.191.234.98 (talk) 19:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two or three Palermo Protocols? 

message: Somehow the use of this word seems inappropriate since "especially" is based on "special" which generally is perceived as good. Maybe a change can be made to "particularly".GinAndChronically (talk) 02:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: "especially" 
Talk:Bill Clinton 1992 presidential campaign

message: Was there hhhhany other names on Clinton's short list for VP?--Sina 21:43, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VP

message: Not even a single mention Gang14 23:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comeback Kid?

message: I think that more details are needed in the section related to the nomination contest. I say this with the 2008 candidates' pages as my reference. They are considerably longer. They are massive, whereas this page isn't. Why is there such a drastic difference? SkepticBanner (talk) 04:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More Details Needed

message: I added the template because I feel that statements such as "The candidates in 1992 were considered one of the weakest starting grids the Democrats had ever chosen" need either to be referenced to sources whose authors expressed such an opinion, or else removed. It Is Me Here (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Template:POV-check|POV-check]] template 

message: If anybody attempts to modernize this article, campaign logos can be found here for the infobox. --William S. Saturn (talk) 22:18, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox