lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tricuspid valve

message: The text of the citation (Van Pragh) goes: " The number of tricuspid valve leaflets is variable. In infancy, the TV often appears only to have two leaflets, parietal and septal. But throughout most of adolescent and adult life, the TV has three leaflets because the parietal (free wall) leaflet is subdivided into anterior and posterior portions by the chordal insertions from the anterior papillary muscle. In old age, particulary after several bouts of congestive heart failure, , an infundibular leaflet appears - just beneath the conal septum and between the anterior and septal leaflets of the TV." See also Robert H. Anderson and Anton E. Becker: Cardiac Anatomy, for a further discussion. They are not so sure as Van Pragh, but have an interesting discourse about the nature of the tricuspid valve. --Ekko 07:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of leaflets 

message: What exactly is a cuspid?  Neither this article nor the article on the bicuspid valve say.  Thanks. --Irrevenant [ talk ] 05:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the definition coming from the Latin for point. Although for bicuspid this might not be exactly right..  but given the existing word tricuspid.. Jimw338 (talk) 07:20, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a cuspid? 

message: This article explained nothing about how the valve works. Not a signficant amount of information either. Many people rely on this site so I think ,in my opinion, this article should be edited a little more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.144.181.46 (talk) 03:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How the valve works
Talk:Real Stories

message: Has this show been axed? The "series finale" was after like..8 episodes. ~ EmeZxX 07:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe Network Ten only ordered 8 episodes and so only 8 episodes were produced. It was not axed, it just completed its run. Alex Douglas (talk) 06:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

text: The show was syndicated by Channel Ten in 2007. Alex Douglas (talk) 06:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Axed?

message: "The show originally started as a project for Channel 31, Melbourne's community Television station as a combination of Roving Enterprises and Radio Karate." I am assuming that this sentence means it was a joint production or something, but i can't make head nor tail of it. Can anyone clean it up? WookMuff 10:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a bid odd, but.. Hamish, Andy, Ryan and Tim created a sketch comedy show called Radio Karate that is similiar to Real Stories. Radio Karate is also the name of a production company which, alongside Roving Enterprises produced Real Stories. Hope that clears it up. Oh, and I think what that quote means is that Real Stories was originally going to be produced for broadcast on Channel 31, but was instead picked up by Network Ten. It is a bit messy though. Alex Douglas (talk) 06:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  confused in country NSW. 

message: Network Ten 'Real Stories' Promotional Page link is a ghost —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.171.64.39 (talk) 09:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Link
Talk:Balga, Western Australia

message: Names of boxing instructors (anonymous revision Sep 06) - surely not noteworthy?  Callophylla 07:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Have removed this info. Bonga 08:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed, Balga Senior High School is not as bad as it is made out. There is a whole Anti-Balga campaign going on in my area... Their tools are lies... Nytewolf2k7 02:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments
Talk:Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995

message: is this the same thing that Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1996 was talking about or are there two different laws passed in consecutive years?  Morwen - Talk 07:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this government site, the Act was passed in 1995 and amended in 1996, which might be the source of the confusion.  I'd recommend merging the 1996 article into this one. --Delirium 11:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Delirium 14:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  is 

message: It has been suggested that Bob Dent may be merged here. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Dent. - Nabla (talk) 15:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, as the article stands now it'd make sense to merge, but some of the comments on the AfD page suggest that Dent's role was larger than just being the first person to die under the act, and involved being basically the public face of the legislation. If true, then I'd say keep as a separate article and expand instead. Don't feel strongly either way though. --Delirium (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if he had a larger involvement, most likely the part with encyclopedic value of his life story will be only connected to this. So I agree with merging (but I know nothing more than the articles say). - Nabla (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Bob Dent? 
Talk:List of statutes of New Zealand (2008–2017)

message: an awful lot of these links to go either disambiguation pages or relevant british/irish statutes.  this would be less likely if the entire short title, including the year, was linked - is there any particular reason or local custom this isn't being done?  Morwen - Talk 07:53, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: also, eh, what is going on with this list anyway?  why is 
Criminal Justice Act 1998 Amendment Act 
being listed in the 1985 section???? do new zealand legislators have time machines? this seems widespread. Morwen - Talk 08:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I've 'broken' links to overseas acts. This page generally has a lot of problems... it should probably be a category rather than a list since most of these Acts will probably never get pages. There should be some kind of standard way of distinguishing NZ acts from overseas ones of the same name. I would lean towards including 'New Zealand' in the title rather than the year, since the country name is more likely to be included in the search than the date. --Helenalex 01:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the Act name should include the date and title because that is how the legislation is generally refered to in New Zealand. If you must then distinguish it from the other legislation then put the disambiguator (New Zealand) on the end. The problem I see with the list is that the original author has created the list from a date ordered list that lists the date of the last amending act, not the principal act that was ammended. It is probably useful to have this list so that one knows what articles are yet to be written about New Zealand legislation and as a starting point for authors writing new articles to get the title right, but in its present condition it is not extremely useful. Ordering by year of publication is probably not as useful as ordering alphabetically by title, though using the date and especially the last ammendment/publication date does ensure one gets all the ammendments too. -- Cameron Dewe 02:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Robert L. Bradshaw International Airport

message: Skb means Socket Buffer for computer networking.
Jaapvstr 07:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does SKB link here? 

message: This seems to me to violate WP:UNDUE and WP:NOTNEWS. Firstly, the section title states "accidents" when the body makes no mention of any accident. Secondly, while it was certainly an incident, I don't know if it's notable enough for mention here. I could go either way on its inclusion, but the title of the section definitely needs to change. Thoughts? SGMD1 Talk/Contribs 15:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidents and incidents section
Talk:Egan

message: the MOS:DABSEEALSO clearly states that See also entries can include easily-confused terms and possible misspellings. There is no requirement that terms be related etymologically. Egen (disambiguation) is a valid See also item for this page. (pinging  who has recently edited this section.) Leschnei (talk) 22:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Leschnei. Per MOS:DABSEEALSO, "terms which can be confused with Title" belong in the See also section. This is a common and well-established practice. See, for example, Smyth and Smiths in Smith#See also. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section
Talk:Diocese of St Asaph

message: this needs cleanup to de-emphasise the prominence of the Catholic pov of lack of continuity at the reformation : i suppose this POV came in with the catholic encyclopedia.   Morwen - Talk 15:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see my comment at Talk:Bishop of St Asaph TSP 02:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: Unlike articles on Dioceses in England, I see no section on Bishops. No need for a list from year dot - just a mention of who the the present Bishop is (yes, he is in infobox), and any honorary assistant Bishops (who are usually drawn from retired Anglican/Church in Wales bishops living in a diocese).Cloptonson (talk) 14:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing - section on Bishops
Talk:Vyborg Library

message: I was in Viipuri on August 16, 2003, and no only was the auditorium ceiling being repaired on that very day, but I managed to graffiti my name onto the supporting carcassing. Anyone who wishes to go there and dismantle the ceiling will be able to verify this.
Surely it is therefore in error to say that the ceiling has not been repaired.
------
I was last there in September 2003 at the DOCOMOMO seminar. Then the small area of ceiling that had been symbolically reconstructed in 1998 (the Aalto centenary) was still in place. That's what you perhaps thought was part of the repaired ceiling. In November 2006 I contacted the Finnish architect who is directing the current on-going works, and he told me that they have not yet begun on the ceiling but have been finishing off the floors and the roofs, and undersides of the flat ceilings with the circular rooflights. They hope to start on the famous auditorium ceiling in 2007. But the big problem has been financing; they can only proceed as new funds arrive, which comes a bit at a time. They even recieved a small amount of money from the Getty Foundation in USA. So, as it stands in December 2006 the ceiling has NOT been RECONSTRUCTED - because it is a reconstruction that is necessary. --TTKK 22:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undulating auditorium ceiling 

message: I can swear that I visited a bookstore in Berlin the interior of which was laid out in exactly the same manner as in this picture of this library's insides.  Can anyone provide an explanation?  Unfortunately, I have no memory of what that bookstore was called, but it's just too perfect of a match to be of mere coincedence.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 22:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aalto designed several buildings for Berlin, but I don't think these were bookstores. I have seen a 1930s photograph of the ceiling in question. It is almost identical to the modern picture on www.aalto.vbg.ru. --Ghirla -трёп- 09:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Not that it helps, but then it is me who doesn't remember the details.  I can imagine that the building could have been re-purposed, though, but that's just pure speculation.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interior

message: According to the Lonely Planet guide,  Alvar Aalto "disowned it when the russians renovated it with a granite facade." Searching the web I can't find any real authoritative confirmation of this, though. Perhaps a Finnish speaker would have better luck.
I have an old photo of said facade, but wasn't sure how notable it would be.
24.18.233.243 (talk) 06:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disowned by Aalto on account of renovation?
Talk:Saxo Bank

message: Regarding "but stopped the contribution af the parliamentary election", should "af" be any of "at", "of", "ahead of", "during", "prior to" ? Beats me. R. Henrik Nilsson (talk) 10:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "but stopped the contribution af the parliamentary election" - "at", "of", "ahead of", "during" ?
Talk:Static analysis

message: As the discussion over at dynamic scoring indicates, this term is used in the fashion described here only in the context of US budget policy disputes. The distinction in physics between statics and dynamics is totally unrelated to what is presented here. I've tried to give a reasonably NPOV description of how the term is actually used. I deleted all the non-budget examples, which were all irrelevant and mostly incorrect. Much of the article read as if it was taken straight from the Newt Gingrich site given as the only link - material of this kind should be quoted and attributed, not reproduced as fact. JQ 08:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

message: As it is now, the article is unclear enough that I tagged it as such. I don't know anything about what kind of analysis is being talked about, or what "scoring" means. I think the article needs to start with a bit more context. - furrykef (Talk at me) 09:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear 

message: hi i think it may be clearly defined through economic  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.107.232.34 (talk) 08:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Cleanup 

message: The economic policy section is a thinly veiled assertion of the premises of supply-side economics as established fact, which is, frankly, flabbergasting. As it stands this article should be considered to be captured by a particular political ideology. 2601:A:480:24D:D1D4:4A10:120C:24DC (talk) 19:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political bias 

message: This article is a complete mess. It started out years ago defining the title term as extrapolating short term trends to the long term, and the examples are still in that mold. But the lead definition has evolved to "the effect of an immediate change to a system is calculated without respect to the longer term response of the system to that change." Not the same thing--short term analysis need not be improperly exptrapolated. I'm going to restore to the lead something about improper extrapolation.
The examples are not sourced, and at least one of them (the ice age example) is historically untrue, and another (assuming it's going to keep snowing for the next sixty years) is utterly ridiculous. I'm going to delete those two and put citation-needed tags on the others.
The history section says in its entirety  "The term "static analysis" was used in 1977 in an international academic journal,[2] in a discussion of tax policy. In recent years, it has become very common in academic, business, and political discussions of US government economic policy." Now this is just absurd: The cited article has "comparative static analysis" in its title, and (as that author understood) this term has been in use in economics since the 1940s. This makes me wonder if the term "static analysis" is nothing more than an earlier Wikipedia editor's naive shortening of "comparative static analysis", in which case this page ought to be just deleted. I won't open that can of worms, but I'll delete the ridiculous history section and put a factual-accuracy tag on the article as a whole. Loraof (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A mess
Talk:Sentinel (sculpture)

message: The sculpture and shadow is clearly visible from the Google Maps (satellite view) from this link:  - checked October 2006.  Oosoom Talk to me 08:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WGS84 coordinates added into article by coord template. More accurate than above grid reference when using Google maps. Oosoom Talk to me 23:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satellite view 
Talk:Shtadlan

message: What language is this word in? Yiddish? Hebrew? Badagnani 07:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What language

message: At first it says, "A Shtadlan ... represented interests of the local Jewish community ... in Medieval Europe.
A bit later, it says, "The Shtadlan emerged in the 17th century."
I am confused. Please explain.
75.84.97.215 11:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What century?

message: The current version of the article says the Hebrew word is shadlan (שדלן), but in English and Yiddish it is cited as shtadlan (שתדלן), with a t (ת) after the sh (ש). Is this correct? If so, can someone explain the discrepancy (preferably in the article)? If not, can someone please fix this? 78.43.40.201 (talk) 12:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Hebrew, is it shtadlan (שתדלן) or shadlan (שדלן)?
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cott12/Notebook

message: Dear all, Since my name has been mentioned in the debate, and in previous discussions at the Dutch version of Wikipedia, I feel it's only fair to ask Dutch Wiki-editor User:JohJak why he said that "what the English Wikipedians do is their business". User:Cott12 removed his Dutch user page immediately, so I think this recent move by JohJak may come across as a little self-contradictory. Many people from Holland, the Caribbean, Dutch-speaking Indonesian professors of Philosophy & Theology, and Americans of Dutch descent have e-mailed me about Cott12's initiative, telling us how much they appreciated it. As for me, I could not have written my recent Dutch article on Meher Baba for Wikipedia without the incredible support of this model Wikipedian, who is willing to help new Wikipedians out with technical problems, background info, links and illustrations at all times.
Best wishes, and keep up the good wiki-work,
Frank Landsman 09:14, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Inter-A

message: In all honesty, this article reads like an advertisement of the program, particularly when using words like "we" or "our" in the body and referring to why students like or profit from it conjecturally. It needs work by someone familiar with the program, or it needs deletion. --BlueSquadronRaven 09:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NPOV|Point of View]] 

message: :Not the original poster of this topic, but I've taken a WP:WIKIIMP stab at marking up and cleaning out some of the peacock wording. We absolutely need some more sources. Elfabet (talk) 21:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality may be fixed; article still needs sources
Talk:Hans-Erich Voss

message: Berchtesgaden was not in the GDR. How come he died in West Germany? Lupo 09:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

message: how does an admiral get wounded three more times?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.161.4.70 (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  wound
Talk:Devolution (album)

message: Someone should describe the videoclip, 
And what is it about anyway.. (about us - devolved from our former genre - not smarter than the chimp (scene with ball) ) and the connection to the words - The critic about the Republican viewpoints - the 'convention' scene .  and
just because it is not the wiki way, I didn't, but it belongs here in the talk page until the band's conformation would please the wiki-gods.
chau  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.50.112 (talk) 07:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Keith Packard

message: I'm not trying to be mean, but does this guy really deserve his own wikipedia article? The subject seems to be less than encyclopedic. Should we delete?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.43.34.226 (talk) 05:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion? 

message: Mention if  is related to the founders of Hewlett Packard or not. Jidanni (talk) 14:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:   Keith Packard / Hewlett Packard 

message: This article need more independent reliable sources to show that this person meets WP:GNG. --Dom from Paris (talk) 13:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The  tag has been removed by , I agree with him and  above: he is notable by himself to all people who happen to be aware of Linux and UNIX history. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 12:26, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Scout prayers

message: I set the importance to low: There is not much to say about Scout prayers beyond "Prayers said by or especially formulated for Scouts". --jergen 11:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rerating

message: The chosen prayers seem to be BSA-centered; we should move the article to Scout prayer (BSA) or include some non-BSA prayers whilst removing the BSA ones. I'm against including all know Scout prayers: As am member of a Protestant Scout organization I know at least 20 German frequently used Scout prayers. --jergen 11:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about a merge to Religion in Scouting?  --Gadget850 ( Ed) 15:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: We now have an IP editor removing this refenced material. To him/her I say that referenced material should not be removed in favour of non-referenced material and that we should discuss the scope of this article here. Also edits should be explained in an edit summary. --Bduke  (Discussion) 05:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: BSA-specific?
Talk:Night of the Murdered Poets

message: This article says he was shot in in the basement of Lubyanka prison in 1952, but the Der Nister article says he died in the Gulag in 1950. Which is correct? Speciate 03:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. Fixed it. ←Humus sapiens ну? 10:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Der Nister

message: On November 22, 1955, the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR determined that there was "no substance to the charges" against the defendants and closed the case.
Does this mean the victims were officially (if posthumously) "rehabilitated"? The "category" links at the end include "Soviet rehabilitations." 
Interesting article. Sca (talk) 14:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible Nikita Khrushchev used this incident in one of his speeches denouncing Stalin, but I'll have to dig around a little.  A subject-matter-expert may know off the top of their heads ... HammerFilmFan (talk) 02:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rehabilitated?

message: Who called it "Night of the Murdered Poets"? The Russian and Yiddish titles are completely different.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: The first paragraph under Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee mentions "Itzik Fefer" - but no. 3 in the list of Defendants is "Itzik Feffer". Which is correct? If both are acceptable, wouldn't it be sensible to select one and use it consistently? Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 04:56, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fefer or Feffer?
Talk:Catawba Valley Community College

message: I restored the "primary source section" template, because the concerns aren't quite adressed.
(repeating post from IP editor's talk page)
I had a problem accessing the sources added at Catawba Valley Community College (Great Schools , and NCES ). The first server timed out on me https://greatschools.org/north-carolina/township-of-taylorsville/11979/Alexander-Early-College/ (even just the domain itself), and the second https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/school_details.asp?Search=1&State=37&SchoolPageNum=2&ID=370009003396 gave me a 404 - file not found, and failed to find the school under "Catawba" from its search page. Can you clarify where we can get the references that were cited?   signed, Willondon (talk)  20:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with secondary sources added