lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Α/β proteins

message: I do not think this should be merged with Α+β proteins. Though they sound similar, they have some small structural differences that can be seen by looking at each article. Dogposter 12:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge templates weren't properly applied, so that they proposed discussion in two different places. I have redirected discussion to Talk:Α+β proteins#The Merge. Hans Adler 23:00, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Merge
Talk:Α+β proteins

message: I do not think this should be merged with Α/β proteins. Though they sound similar, they have some small structural differences. Dogposter 12:20, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Make it happen. This has been open for over two years and it seems that it makes sense to merge. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Merge
Talk:Chemical modification

message: Edited the first sentence in "Chemical modification in chemistry" to accommodate a sense of directness that would exclude unnecessary information that would compromise the reader's ease of study. 
(E.g. Referencing examples of macromolecules that could be chemically modified should be included in a subsequent heading under "Chemical modification in chemistry" instead of directly in its first sentence which should clearly and formally address this subsection's topic)
Changed a number of instances of the word "modification(s)" to their synonymous counterparts. Repetitively including this word compromises the articles uniqueness and significance upon chemical modification. Consider using less of the words "Chemical" and "Modification" consecutively (Unless it is used to describe its functional relationship in dependence of another topic) as it may appear vague to the reader what this means.
Changed "...to change the electrode's physical..." to "to change the electrode's properties, such as its physical,..., and transport characteristics." (Maintained respective links). Thumbs up**
Rephrased the first sentence in "Chemical modification in biochemistry" to be more clear. Also rephrased the second sentence to grammatically proceed to the examples listed.
Reformatted and rephrased the bulleted section of "Chemical modification in biochemistry.
Added the "History" subsection.
Added the "Foundations of Chemical Modification" subsection.
Punctuated each header with "Main Article: [insert main article link]" for ease of source access to their respective locations within the page.
Sourced information bears accuracy in addition to a great foundation to expand upon larger concepts
Rmmariusz (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small and minor changes regarding the phrasing and inclusiveness of certain information. 

message: — Assignment last updated by Flelza (talk) 16:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry I
Talk:Bromodomain

message: It seems like this paper:
Tamkun JW, Deuring R, Scott MP, Kissinger M, Pattatucci AM, Kaufman TC, Kennison JA. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):561-72. brahma: a regulator of Drosophila homeotic genes structurally related to the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SWI2.
may report the independent discovery of the bromodomain. But I cannot access it to verify that. Alexbateman (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery
Talk:Cerro de la Estrella (archaeological site)

message: I've moved this article to the site's Spanish name, since it is a general convention in Mesoamerican studies not to translate site names into english (cf. Palenque not "Palisades", Dos Pilas not "Two Springs", El Mirador not "the Lookout", etc.)--cjllw | TALK 03:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note re name change 
Talk:Bellbird (TV series)

message: The statement that the ABC "taped over the master tapes" of Bellbird is nothing new or extraordinary.  The ABC did this with many programs of the time, almost nothing was kept on videotape after it had been transferred to 16mm film (using a process called kinescope).  I would be very surprised if a huge number of Bellbirds, even the very early ones, were not in existence on film, and it's this that should be addressed in the article. Pete3194 (talk) 13:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Master tapes
Talk:Lorraine Bayly

message: He was a journalist of US origin. Steve Obaugh. Died in the 1990s. 218.103.199.88 (talk) 14:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Husband?

message: Template:Infobox person defines years active as "Date range in years during which the subject was active in their principal occupation(s) and/or other activity for which they are notable."
The lead states "Bayly has been a performer since she was a child", establishing these years as notable and therefore the beginning of her "years active".
Celjski Grad (talk) 20:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years active
Talk:Number 96 (TV series)

message: There's a "[who?]" next to the text "Duke and Duchess of Bedford" in the "Guest stars" section. Assuming it refers to the then-current Duke and Duchess, it would be Ian Russell, 13th Duke of Bedford and Nicole Russell, Duchess of Bedford who were Duke and Duchess from 1960 until 2002. Further weight is added to this suggestion by noting that Ian Russell, 13th Duke of Bedford has previous form for appearing as himself in (non-documentary) TV shows and films (see https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0066056/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t34). Is this sufficient evidence to link "Duke" to Ian Russell, 13th Duke of Bedford (instead of Duke of Bedford) and "Duchess of Bedford" to Nicole Russell, Duchess of Bedford (instead of Duchess of Bedford)? DH85868993 (talk) 07:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any objections, I've made the described changes and removed the "[who?]". DH85868993 (talk) 05:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duke and Duchess of Bedford 

message: 560 of the 1218 episodes are lost and only 96 episodes have been made available to the public so I'm not sure where we are getting these episode counts from as they can never be accurate, there is also no such list in the book that is listed as a source. There's also a lot of redundant parts of the article that repeat itself over and over again but I'll work on the cast list first. We need to follow wiki rules so first episode main cast and then additions at the bottom, something like this with years and episode DURATION would be better/more accurate. this just from the first 35 episodes i will look through the other available episodes/info and add and tweak more before adding to article
===Original cast members===
Character          	Actor           	Year(s)	Episodes
Aldo Godolfus      	Johnny Lockwood 	1972–75	1―
Rose Godolfus Myers	Vivienne Garrett	1972–75	1―
Mark Eastwood      	Martin Harris   	1972   	1―55
Helen Eastwood     	Briony Behets   	1972   	1―55
Janie Somers       	Robyn Gurney    	1972   	1―141
Bev Houghton       	Abigail         	1972–73	1―
Alf Sutcliffe      	James Elliott   	1972–75	1―
Lucy Sutcliffe     	Elisabeth Kirkby	1972–75	1―
Vera Collins Sutton	Elaine Lee      	1972–76	1―
Bruce Taylor       	Paul Weingott   	1972–74	1―
Don Finlayson      	Joe Hasham      	1972–77	1―1218
Dorrie Evans       	Pat McDonald    	1972–77	1―1218
Herb Evans         	Ron Shand       	1972–77	1―1218
===Later additions===
Character     	Actor        	Year(s)	Episodes
Maggie Cameron	Bettina Welch	1972–76	7―
Harry Collins 	Norman Yemm  	1972–74	10―40
Sonia Freeman 	Lynn Rainbow 	1972–73	13―
Gordon Vansard	Joe James    	1972   	31―
Chad Farrell  	Ronne Arnold 	1972   	23―68
 Pinchofhope (talk) 08:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast section is too messy 

message: Character     	Actor        	Year(s)	Episodes
Maggie Cameron	Bettina Welch	1972–76	7―
Harry Collins 	Norman Yemm  	1972–74	10―40
Sonia Freeman 	Lynn Rainbow 	1972–73	13―
Gordon Vansard	Joe James    	1972   	31―
Chad Farrell  	Ronne Arnold 	1972   	23―68
 Pinchofhope (talk) 08:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Later additions
Talk:Dausuva

message: I've heard he was also thinking about Madagascar--Lokyz 11:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So far this article is a stub. Some major extention and explanation of context is needed. So far it is based on one source, and this one does not mention Madagascar (but it is true, so we just need to finf more sources).  I think also Mosambique was considered. Encyclopaedia Editing Dude 11:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was Vincas Pietaris who was thinking about Madagascar.--Lokyz 20:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:BBC Scotland Sports Personality of the Year

message: Is this list really incomplete?  I think I recall the BBC just stopped doing this for a few years. Sologoal (talk) 08:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Any ext ref for that? --Mais oui! (talk) 07:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete?

message: I am sure when BBC Scotland used to do this as a separate, full programme in the 1990s (similar to the format of the UK-wide BBC Sports Personality of the Year) there was  a team of the year award. A 1986 example is given here, but I seem to recall that Raith Rovers won it in 1994 following their sensational League Cup win and Rangers in 1993 for their treble and Champions League exploits. If anyone has any info on this (and assuming it was a regular feature) it would be a useful addition to the article I think. Dunarc (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team of the year?
Talk:Uran

message: I went ahead and merged the articles as there were no other comments regarding the merger. I also made some minor fixes and added the scripts. Thanks, AnupamTalk 20:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Pierre

message: Deleted section on Pierre Giroux as it was unverified and presented a biased opinion 130.102.128.60 11:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giroux 

message: Shouldn't this be a disambiguation page, and not an Anthroponymy page? Zminer (talk) 15:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dab 
Talk:ThinkLight

message: I removed a statement from the article, according to which the move to an amber LED may have had economic reasons. In my opinion this is highly unlikely, as the cost of an LED in any (standard) color is far lower than 1 USD. IBM would not compromise ergonomics on that basis. It is more likely that they believed a yellow light would improve contrast while reducing glare, but until we can find an authoritative statement by IBM or Lenove to that effect we shouldn't speculate. 149.217.1.6 11:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ThinkLight Color
Talk:Birational geometry

message: I was wondering if there could be a picture added with reference to the example of the birational equivalence of the projective plane and a quadric.  Is it possible to create an intuitive picture of the projection to see where the 'blow ups' happen?  Thanks.  72.151.105.202 11:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suggest a better notation:
:\phi : X \text{⇢} Y
Madyno (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation
Talk:List of Roman Catholic archbishops of Sydney

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Perth#Merger proposal which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — Rangasyd (talk) 13:54, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The crest is not a papal tiara but an episcopal miter
--Chilbaric (talk) 01:37, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crest: Papal tiara
Talk:Frank Little (bishop)

message: It was originally announced that he had died on "Tuesday" (8 April), and that date went into the article.  In yesterday's Age, a piece about him said he'd died "on Monday night" (7th), so I changed the article.  In today's Age, there's a full obituary, also with the date 7 April, but in the Death/Funeral notices there's a notice from the religious fraternity that says he died on "8th April".  Apparently he died in his sleep and was found dead in the morning, so nobody knows exactly when he died, and different people are assuming different dates.  So, what do we do in cases like this?  --  JackofOz (talk) 06:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: Although it is true in Britain that clergy who are knighted do not use the title of "Sir", in Australia this restriction does not apply and those who have been knighted have generally used the title.  This included Cardinal Gilroy who was commonly referred to as "Cardinal Sir Norman Gilroy".  Frank Little was much more often referred to as "Sir Frank Little" than "Archbishop Little". Anglicanus (talk) 01:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The Tributes and Celebrations pages of the local papers have had many notices about him, all headed "Archbishop Sir Frank Little" etc.  --  JackofOz (talk) 03:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sir
Talk:David Curtin

message: THIS SEEMS TO BE THE WRONG DAVID CURTIN, THIS IS NOT THE FELLOW WHO IS A
MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. NOR IS IT THE DAVID CURTIN WHO
IS A PROFESSOR IN THE CHEMISTRY DEPT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS.
THUS, THINK THAT THE PROBLEM IS IN A LINK FROM THE NAS SITE. PERHAPS ANOTHER
EDITOR CAN CHECK THIS TO ASCERTAIN IF I AM CORRECT.
--128.104.69.138 (talk) 20:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved this comment from the from article page to talk page - Teester (talk) 09:11, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other David Curtins
Talk:Denys Lasdun

message: Grade II-listed on 19/6/2020.  Some more info on Lasdun in the listing particulars.  Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 22:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  IBM Building, South Bank, London 

message: The second sentence in the paragraph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denys_Lasdun#Late_work states "King Charles compared it to a nuclear power station but it was popular with other traditionalists, with John Betjeman writing Lasdun a letter in praise of its design." However, according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_National_Theatre#Architecture, the letter John Betjeman wrote to Lasdun "praising" him was ironic: "John Betjeman, a man not noted for his enthusiasm for brutalist architecture, wrote to Lasdun stating ironically that he "gasped with delight at the cube of your theatre in the pale blue sky and a glimpse of St Paul's to the south of it. It is a lovely work and so good from so many angles...it has that inevitable and finished look that great work does.""
Clearly only one of these articles is correct, since the former states the praise was sincere while the latter states the praise was ironic. If the latter is correct then it would invalidate the former's entire paragraph thesis that "it was popular with other traditionalists", or at least requiring some other proof of this popularity. 143.177.112.154 (talk) 14:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sincere or Ironic Praise from John Betjeman
Talk:Velouté sauce

message: "Thus the ingredients of a velouté are butter and flour to form the roux," While this is true in the original meaning, now days roux based sauces are non existent. The use of flour to thicken sauce has been substituted for reduction of stock, butter addition and a generally reduced sauce.
 (Anon.)
:: That comment is rather bizarre.  Roux based sauces are made every day of the week all over the world. to say they are "non existent" would be like saying "nobody drinks coca cola anymore" or "ketchup is nonexistent".  It just doesn't make any sense.83.196.224.153 (talk) 16:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a velouté, then. --Wetman 12:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Not true many sauces are still thickened with flour Trewornan 21:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The first line of Suprême sauce states that it is derived from Béchamel sauce, whereas this article claims that it is derived from velouté. Since I am unfamiliar with the world of French gastronomy, I request that someone else correct this problem. Lockesdonkey 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Supreme sauce is properly made from veloute but you can also make it by adding stock to Bechamel, in effect both are true. Trewornan 02:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with [[Suprême sauce]] 

message: Since the definition of velouté is "a smooth white sauce made with meat, poultry, or fish stock", isn't "velouté sauce" redundant? Like saying beef meet, corn vegetable, or hazelnut nut? What about changing the name of the article to "velouté"? DBlomgren (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "Velouté" just means "velvety", which the sauce is thought to be. It's more weird that the article doesn't mention this etymology. Bruhpedia (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about changing to just "velouté"
Talk:Po, Asturias

message: Why is this an article? What has the town done that warrant an article? Right now it's just "it's a town and it is --> here" --LifeEnemy 21:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All towns and villages are notable on Wikipedia.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable?
Talk:Kariong, New South Wales

message: I must admit, my thoughts on this are coloured by my own investigations into the glyphs. I visited the site in 2005 with my wife, who worked at the local cinema in . When she mentioned the glyphs to a colleague, the colleague revealed that she used to picnic near them (there's a great lookout site just above the glyphs) in the 1940s. The alleged "tomb" is a case of natural erosion. There are a couple of rock slabs that appear to have been put in place place by human hands that stop soil from being washed down into the "tomb" entrance, so all of the soil under 2 or 3 massive boulders (I'd be surprised of they weren't several hundred tonnes each) has been washed away leaving a quite impressive cavity. A few hundred metres below the site are the stumps of a house that used to be there early in the 20th century and all the evidence that I could find pointed to the glyphs being carved by a former resident, who just happened to be a returned WWI soldier who had been stationed in (drum roll) Egypt. Since they were originally carved, there have been numerous additions and re-carvings. One of the additions was the ancient Egyptian hieroglyph for a 14 pin, dual-in-line integrated circuit that I mentioned at WP:AWNB. As I also mentioned, the "translation" of the glyphs originated with Rex Gilroy, who was the only person in the world able to translate them. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I just looked at the article after it was mentioned on WP:FTN, and there seems to be a contradiction in the text I don't understand, namely "Protodynastic" vs. "Khufu".  Which are they claimed to be? Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 21:54, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hard to tell since the now blocked editor(for multiple copyvio and ignoring copyvio warnings) messed up the article, moving sources so they no longer applied to text, using an amateur as a source, etc. The sources attached to the claims mention neither. I'll look later to see what Ray Johnson claimed. Dougweller (talk) 05:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just some thoughts
Talk:Killcare, New South Wales

message: Does anyone know the origin of the name Killcare?wycombe (talk) 22:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

message: Some of you may notice that this article is starting to out grow it's modest original listing.
I think that we should have the general description separated from the community and history sections. 
Perhaps the local history group could guide us here? (davidab (talk) 03:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to organise this article/post 
Talk:Filipinos (snack food)

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Strong support per nom. -Patstuarttalk|edits 03:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Better to idealize Portuguese customs than Spanish because Spanish customs are crude and barbaric! The Philippine government is a shame because it has no power to force it's dismay with the Spanish Racists! This is terrible article and very disturbing, Filipinos should distance it's civilization from Spain and Hispanic ways forever. No Por Idioma Espanol! Death to the Spanish Barbarians!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.68.114 (talk) 07:51, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Spain has racists as every country in the world. Filipinos literally means "from the Philipines" so you can say in Spanish "Coche filipino" meaning Philippine car without any negative connotation towards the Philipine Islands. Additionally it is impossible to erase more than 300 years of coexistence, and in my humble opinion, Spanish traces on Filipino culture are not only enriching but also beautifying for both cultures. Furthermore it is truly barbaric to demand the death of a nation only because you do not agree with the name of a snack, and without meaning offense, the history of the Philippines isn't much more enlightened and peaceful since 1898. Maybe instead of trying to change the rest of the world you could try to understand it.
PS: From what I could gather not all Filipinos feel the way you do so please restrain yourself of making such wild claims without any basis.
Yours trully,
A Spaniard
--Escorxador (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is one of the reasons why the Filipino people has an ill will toward Spain and the Spanish people! 
Talk:Zapotecan languages

message: The page Zapotec language is not about one language it is about a group of mutually unintelligible languages that shares the same name (just like  Nahuatl language is about a language group). To say that the zapotecan languages consist of the Zapotec language and chatino is a gross oversimplification: there is as much diversity within the zapotec languages as there is between zapotec and chatino. It simply paints the wrong picture. I'll try to think of a better way to word the page which needs serious expansion anyway. Maunus 19:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How is this article different from Zapotec language?  If the difference is clear to a specialist, I think it would help to explain it.  I nearly replaced this page with a redirect, but this page already links to the other one, so somebody seems to think there's a difference.  -- Rick Block (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about a particular subgroup of languages, most of whose members happen to be known (for historical and cultural-identity reasons, not necessarily a reflection of their degrees of relatedness) by a name involving zapotec, such Northern Zapotec, Isthmus Zapotec. The living language exception is Chatino, also regarded as a member of the Zapotecan languages. Thus this article's scope differs from that of zapotec language(s), which are the subset of Zapotecan language/dialects spoken in communities that as a group have been called Zapotec people(s). It's a bit like how the Germanic languages grouping includes more than just varieties of German, except that in the case of Zapotecan langs the knowledge/study of them and their speakers had tended to lump them together even more so. As the documentation of these langs evolved thru the 20thC they've been more differentiated, but historical practice and cultural identity still tags most of them under Zapotec, or a variety thereof.--cjllw ʘ TALK 01:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mazatecan languages

message: There are 3 Huatla lects in different branches of the tree. Which is the prestige form?
Also, are Santa Maria Jiotes & Coatzospan not covered by ISO? — kwami (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  which is the prestige variety? 