Talk:Mani pulite

message: The image :Image:Craxi coins.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Craxi coins.jpg

message: Where are the explanations of the details of the corrupt activities?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.25.88 (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absolutely cretinous explanation 

message: I can't see the link between the Clean Hands scandal and the death of the anti-Mafia judge Giovanni Falcone.  Falcone's prime focus was the Mafia, not the political establishment (although he was of course aware of links between the two).  It's not clear from the article what links there were between the corruption in politics and the Mafia that might explain why Giovanni is referenced in this article and I suggest that some more information is added (along with a general clean-up as suggested above).
Furrypop (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giovanni Falcone 

message: All the page is without a single cite... and given it should be based on a trial, that looks very strange. I do not feel this is really objective at all given that in the current state most of the article could be made up. It states many people are corrupted without giving a direct citation of the source, isn't this very bad? Even if it is "public domain" that those people are corrupted, Wikipedia should report real facts and not "common thinking".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.32.52.42 (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed 

message: I'm going to try to put at least some of this into better English over the next few days; but I don't know enough about the subject to alter anything factual, so I'm really going to limit myself strictly to style and syntax. Hopefully that will be okay with people. 81.108.180.242 (talk) 17:14, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: The page is not objective at all, it describes conjectures and not actual facts. I'm not saying such conjectures aren't true but they are not presented in the right way as should be in an encyclopedia with references to facts (for example trials dates and imputations, quotes,...) and political opinions are also evident in sentences like "Many think that" "it is likely that" "Some blame" "Furthermore, the intricate nature of Italian laws allowed cunning lawyers to use many delaying tactics" which should at least need a quote or the reference from a newspaper article. The page also oversimplifies many aspects of at least twelve years of the Italian political history, the Italian laws and the Italian public opinion in at least twelve years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.16.22.33 (talk) 22:17, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  not objective 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Mani pulite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120205195441/http://www.romacivica.net/anpiroma/larepubblica/repubblica8.htm to http://www.romacivica.net/anpiroma/larepubblica/repubblica8.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This whole section does not have one citation and it seems too opinionated. "Some blame Berlusconi's power in media as having played a role in this change or the inability of the opposite parties to gain the consent of the conservative electors." This sentence is a vague statement that also needs sources to prove its legitimacy. --Mhammel14 (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statutory Term Strategy