lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:St. Xavier High School (Kansas)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 02:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Tipton Catholic High School

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 13:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Trinity Catholic High School (Kansas)

message: The school's staff in recent years have had a couple of issues, between assistant coach Patrick Blevins fondling boys and the recent firing of tennis coach Thomas Harris for posting racist memes. Not sure if that's worth creating a new section for or not, but the article is a stub, after all. Thoughts?
24.225.97.85 (talk) 05:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scandals 

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the WikiProject Schools guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these articles for ideas: Garden City High School (KS), Plano Senior High School (TX), Johnson Senior High School (MN), Stuyvesant High School (NY).
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  00:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:London Underground ticketing

message: As well as touts attempting to sell discarded Travelcards, it is also not uncommon - especially at surburban stations - for alighting passengers to give their used cards away as they leave the station; for example, to someone waiting at a ticketing machine. Plutonium27 (talk) 11:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Travelcard Transfer 

message: Could someone with enough experience (something that I do not believe I have) please take note of the following and edit this article accordingly;
Regarding Penalty Fares & Ticket Evasion, the penalty fare has been changed and is now £50 but it is reduced to £25 if paid within 21 days.
This currently applies across all modes of transport, including London Overground, London Underground, London Buses, Croydon Tramlink and Dockland Light Railway.  However, this does not apply on National Rail train services including the Southern service between Watford Junction and East Croydon as the penalty fare on there still remains at £20 with the potential for a £1000 prosecution.
More information on this is attainable via the following link Penalty Fares & Prosecutions on the TfL website.
As stated above, I do not believe I have enough experience or knowledge to do this and I do not want to mess up the whole article or get into any trouble etc for doing anything wrong.
Many Thanks,
TXC (talk) 16:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penalty Fares 

message: The current discussion of zones makes an uncited comment about "what makes the zones work", which should be amplified. "Work" in what sense. Don't define "work", define what the intent of the zones is, and give support for how that intent is satisfied (and preferably, also ways in which it is not satisfied).
Also, another example should be added explaining the fare, for example, between two points in zone 4. 24.130.145.204 (talk) 13:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Zoning example needed

message: The old tickets used to have an arrow together with the "this side up" notice, but this pointed left on the yellow tickets and right on the season tickets. As far as i know the ticket barriers will read the magnetic stripe in both directions and only refuse tickets that are inserted upside down. Any clues why the arrow was there at all? --77.180.244.182 (talk) 11:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrow on older tickets 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_fare_zones seesm to cover a lot of the same ground.92.232.34.78 (talk) 15:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping articles 

message: I've removed a large chunk of info on old ticket machines - now outdated, and it was unreferenced. Turini2 (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ticket machines
Talk:Cecilia Loftus

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 16:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Support - I've fallen in. Certainly makes sense, just do it. Kbthompson 21:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, it just makes sense (may need a further copyed). Kbthompson 00:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 
Talk:Cedric Belfrage

message: It seems he took part in the cpusa (and fellowtravellers) exodus from the USA to Mexico after 1945.
--Radh (talk) 11:05, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexico 

message: At writing, there doesn't seem to be any coverage of his official work for British intelligence. Apparently they had worked out that he was a Soviet spy but could not prove it sufficiently to bring him to trial due to the difficulty of piercing his cover story that he was giving trivial information to american communists in hopes of getting more valuable information about the Soviets. 
http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2015/08/24/british-mi-5-files-out-another-cold-war-soviet-agent/?singlepage=true
The US decided not to prosecute because the information they knew at the time he had passed was exclusively british, a case of not our circus, not our monkey. The INS was informed that he was involved with the Soviets and that led to his deportation. TMLutas (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  British agent
Talk:Super Bowl squares

message: I am the one who tagged this article.  I looked around, and couldn't find any other Super Bowl office pool game articles in this vein.  Coupling that with this article's lack of sourcing and cleanup needs, I question whether it deserves to stay.  CharacterZero | Speak 20:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable? 

message: Well I'm totally confused.  It talks about quarters but doesn't define what they are a quarter of.  I assume it's some kind of sport or game, but if it is, it's not stated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.55.0.190 (talk) 02:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Reference to What?
Category talk:English-language operettas

message: Some concern about the usefulness of this category as expressed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera#Category deletion.  However, it does appear to me to be a potentially useful and notable intersection, and there appears to be over 20 articles already in :Category:Operettas which could be included here.
However, it is the only by-language subdivision a opera genre category. Is it appropriate to create more intersection categories between language and opera genre?  Should we have :Category:Italian-language grand operas, :Category:German-language grand operas, :Category:Italian-language operettas, :Category:German-language operettas, etc? It seems unbalanced to create only one by-language sub-cat of an opera genre. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's OK with me, but if you make have English-language operettas subcat, don't you also need French and German operettas subcats?  I don't think The Bohemian Girl is an operetta at all.  Operetta hadn't really been invented yet.  I think it was a light opera or comic opera.  The Maid of the Mountains is also questionable.  I moved Gilbert's other operas to :Category:Comic operas, so I guess they will be automatically recatted together with their peers when that category moves. -- Ssilvers 23:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, re-reading my comments above, they don't look as open-ended as I has intended them to be.  I'm not sure that it really is a good idea to divide each genre by language (I can see a case both ways), but I do think that if such a division is to be made, we should try to do so reasonably comprehensively, rather than have only one genre-by-language category. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first intersection categ between Operas-by-language and Operas-by-genre
Talk:Ceferino Namuncurá

message: CEFERINO NAMUNCURA NO ERA HIJO DE UN CACIQUE MAPUCHE SINO DE CAFULCURA, UN CACIQUE TEHUELCHE
LOS TEHUELCHES ERAN PUEBLO ORIGINARIO DE LA PAMPA Y LA PATAGONIA, NO ASÍ LOS MAPUCHES
LOS MAPUCHES COMETIERON SANGRIENTO GENOCIDIO CONTRA LOS TEHUELCHES, NO ENTIENDO POR QUÉ NOMBRAN AL POBRE CEFERINO COMO PERTENCIENTE AL PUEBLO QUE ASESINO A SU PUEBLO  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.191.196.235 (talk) 17:39, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Forth and Cart Canal

message: Pyrotec 20:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/The Transhumanist 2

message: Category talk: 16  
Category: 55  
Help: 24  
Image: 6  
Mainspace 2207  
MediaWiki talk: 3  
Portal talk: 29  
Portal: 355  
Talk: 424  
Template talk: 28  
Template: 512  
User talk: 1734  
User: 2235  
Wikipedia talk: 251  
Wikipedia: 1548  
avg edits per page 4.74  
earliest 06:43, 8 July 2006  
number of unique pages 1988  
total 9427  
2006/7  2   
2006/8  337   
2006/9  880   
2006/10  1407   
2006/11  1619   
2006/12  852   
2007/1  608   
2007/2  1549   
2007/3  1463   
2007/4  216   
2007/5  494   
Run at Tue May 22 20:26:13 2007 GMT using Interiot's wannabe Kate tool. WjBscribe 20:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit stats

message: Hi. Can somebody please add the link below to the RfA? I can't do it, 
presumably since this RfA was speedy deleted in the past and I can't handle that. Thanks!
*See The Transhumanist's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
Mathbot 21:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A bot request
Talk:Ceri Richards

message: I have reverted an edit, changing after seeing the work of Picasso and Kandinsky back to after exposure to the work of Picasso and Kandinsky.
Tumblingsky's comment was 
This is incorrect. The defintions of expose in my dictionary (Collins 1986) include:
This is clearly the intended meaning. Exposure to suggests a deeper knowledge of the works of Picasso and Kandinsky than 'saw' or 'admired'.
Verbcatcher (talk) 20:22, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Exposed to'' or ''saw''
Talk:Beechcraft AQM-37 Jayhawk

message: Raytheon sold Beechcraft in March, so this article is out of date.  Also, its not clear that Beech still owns the target business - may have been sold by the investors.
This needs some updating - I don't have authoratative information on correct information - but I know some of this is wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.96.78.217 (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Without anything definite, or a link, we cannot make any changes. Dreamy \*/!$! 20:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Birdmonster

message: I created the article and had a few sources, but it can definitely be expanded. I did not include any critical response to their album(s), which can be added. Their homepage has a lot of links to press articles and the like. The-bus 20:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of One Piece marines

message: I must say this is a better set up at least for pics relating to characters.  Without the Major Marine related pictures with the characters in the Navy, there is more room.  There is more room for a few more character pictures then we had before the split.  We should watch we don't get too many, or the lesser important ones will have go. 
The Mergers that have taken place recently made me almost forget we split this page up.  We need to bring this page into standard with Wikipedia, but otherwise everything looks great,, the characters finally have room to grow out now.  And its also nice to see the Navy page looking good (but it badly needs bringing up to standard now... Typical, solve one problem, start another XD).  The characters are not clogging up the page.  ^-^ Angel Emfrbl 20:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reckons Garp is an important enough character to have his own pic, though.
I'm not trying to clutter the page or anything but I reckon the characters who I've given pictures are prominent enough as far as Marine's in OP go to warrant it. Tsuru has done pretty much nothing and yet she has a picture, if she has one then someone like Jango should get one to since he has a history with the Strawhats and we have far more knowledge about his backstory and abilitiesSigojwana (talk) 15:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures
Talk:Chancellor Williams

message: There is one ref for this entire article. The one Book is notable in certain communities but is so poorly reviewed you cant even find people critique it. And I have searched. The article would be improved with some RS. I think he merits the classification as a leading Pseudo historian, even more so that his associates Ben and the like. Objections are welcomed. But I have issues due to lack of sources--Inayity (talk) 13:07, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is one ref for this entire article 
Template talk:Twenty-Four Histories

message: Could someone fix this template into a horizontal (flat) version?  This (vertical) template demands a lot of space, and if you look at the articles which has this template, it stretches the format quite a bit.  It would be better if this template wouldn't be so long and demand too much space from these articles. --Balthazarduju 20:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The title of each book is too long, and much longer than the actual name of the article for that book. "Canonical", "history", and "record" are repeated to no purpose. --JWB 20:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inflated titles 

message: I think neither the number of volumes nor the author have to be presented for each book in the template. This information can be gotten by clicking through to the book, and there is little need to have it all at once in the template. Also, the information can be listed in the article Twenty-Four Histories instead of the template.
I think the Chinese names are more useful. They take up only 2-4 characters apiece, slightly shorter than the author names or number of volumes, and are useful to look up when you know the Chinese name and not the English name. However, I could go along with omitting them from the template and just having them in the article, if that is the consensus. --JWB 09:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary information
Talk:Olomoucké tvarůžky

message: The page in the present form is just an advertisement of somebody. --Toni Sotte 20:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: (Untitled)
Talk:Aseity

message: I put the original research banner over the Aseity page because of the last claims regarding aseity of the universe. I am not aware of decay and corruption being widespread throughout the universe, nor am I aware that it is self-evident, nor am I aware how this poses a problem to atheistic aseity of the universe. Since there is no citation or source for this claim, I decided that it falls under the guidelines for original research and put up the banner. 70.243.116.156 20:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research

message: ::The capitalisation of "One" and use of, in fact the general choice of words was non-neutral, especially "He is His own existence, ::and nothing can exist without Him."
::I have changed the wording to be neutral.
::I also forward that it should be included that aseity of a deity can be argued to be logically incoherent:
::An entity is defined by its own attributes. In the statement "x determines the properties of x", for the first "x" to successfully ::refer to something, it has to refer to an entity, which already has to have a definite set of properties. Therefore, the notion of ::something being the origin of its own nature (properties) is logically incoherent. 
::Furthermore, for something to have the property of being necessary, this already requires the existence of laws (at least those of ::logic).
::The statement "(P->Q)->((not-P->Q)->Q)" is necessarily true only because of the laws of logic. Without underlying laws, the notion ::of "necessity" is meaningless.
::Saying that a deity is the source of logic or that the laws of logic follow from the deity's nature is thus logically circular.
::91.65.148.226 (talk) 04:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation

message: There appears to be a fragment / incomplete sentence in the introductory paragraph: "Though many Jewish and Muslim theologians have also believed God to be independent in this way." The phrase appears to be orphaned from any of the phrases around it -- making it difficult to immediately correct it... Sir Ian (talk) 04:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar Concern...

message: Under the section heading "Meaning", there is a sentence "As a part of this belief God is said to be incapable of changing ..." and yet the following sentence states "Since God was, and is, and is to be the Absolute Perfection, there is no further need to change ...".  I suggest that by removing the word "further" from the latter sentence, the apparent contradiction would be removed. Mr D Gill (talk) 04:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The "further" gives the impression that there already was some change, which shouldn't be possible. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent contradictory statements
Talk:Homages in Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

message: Much of this entry is very questionable.  For starters, a more accurate title should be "Homages in Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow."  Though some of the entries are accurate, such as the reference to to the sunken Venture from King Kong, the resemblence to some of the robots to the classic Metal Monsters from the Fliescher Superman cartoons, and the use of reconisable sound effects from War of the Worlds, the net is thrown far too wide in this entry.  There's certainly nothing in the film from the Buck Rogers serials, and suggesting that Angela Jolie's character resembles Honor Harrington is a bit of a stretch, beyond the fact that they're one-eyed female military officers.
In addition, some obvious items were missed, like a very clear (if brief) view of a ship identical to the Titantic in the graveyard of ships. User:Sir-Talen
Needs work.
Agreed' on all points. Bearian 18:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable content

message: Shouldn't this be called 'homages in'? 24.218.218.9 05:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved, although I'm not sure about "homages" either. NickelShoe (Talk) 13:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homages ''to'' 

message: The Internet Movie Database's trivia pages are completely user-submitted and do not meet the reliable source criteria.  This is also the same issue with the fan sites for the film, as they do not have a reputation for fact-checking or editorial oversight, being personally published.  I've left references that seemed valid (especially coming from people involved with the film), but I think as a whole, this article should be merged to the film article, considering the sparse verifiable content. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content from unreliable sources

message: Anyone else think this article should be merged with Sky Captain and the World of Tommorrow?
Tricklin 18:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is a good idea, since there's not an overload of content here or at the film's article.  I suggest being bold and merging it yourself. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the 'merge' templates to this article and Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. If there are no objections in the next few weeks, I will carry out the merge myself. Terraxos (talk) 02:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please please merge asap. This article is one of the most redundant entries I've come across on wiki. Who on earth decided this warranted its own page? Feudonym (talk) 05:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's easy to find out: Just look at the first entry in the history. — Val42 (talk) 06:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge