lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Beechcraft

message: hello you too
Wichita is the correct spelling of the city. Someone should edit this for obvious reasons.
::Done (but you could have done it yourself) - Adrian Pingstone 10:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  hello 

message: Is it really "well known" as the manufacturer of the Apollo 13 tanks? I have a more than casual interest in the Apollo program and didn't know that... Janm67 (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Apollo 13

message: Twitters that FT says that Textron has purchased Beechcraft, but no URL yet.  Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Try Report: Beechcraft sold to Textron for $1.4 billion, Textron Said to Buy Beechcraft for Nearly $1.4 Billion, Beechcraft nears $1.4bn sale to Textron, Textron to buy Beechcraft for $1.4 billion: report, Report: Cessna Owner Textron Flies Away With Beechcraft for $1.4B. - BilCat (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Note that this is just a rumor at this point, as, according to the reports, neither Textron nor Beechcraft have confirmed this. - BilCat (talk) 00:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not unexpected as the company has been up for sale for a while AVweb article from October 2013. We just need to keep an eye out for something more substantial than "rumour-level" for the article! - Ahunt (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: AVweb has now published this story, but it is still at "rumour" level and nothing has been conformed by either party potentially involved. I guess we have to keep looking for some confirmation or denial. - Ahunt (talk) 14:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

text: AVweb got the story too! - Ahunt (talk) 11:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breaking News - Textron buying Beechcraft 

message: The founders of record are Walter Beech, Olive Ann Beech, Ted Wells, K.K. Shaul, and C.G. Yankey.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.165.215.253 (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please cite a reliable published source for these claims per WP:RS. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 01:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Founders
Talk:El Vez

message: As far as I know, Graciasland is not particularly a reference to Paul Simon, but, as in the Paul 
Simon song, to Elvis's estate. - Jmabel | Talk 05:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Graciasland''

message: Time is tiempo en Spanish. Vez normally goes together with "una vez", which translates as "once uppon a time" or closer to the idea of "at some point (in time)". El Vez, which is correctly described as ungrammatical, translate better as "the occurrence". It really doesn't matter since the main joke is that it is a play on word on Elvis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.173.142.227 (talk) 23:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that should be deleted.  It's common knowledge that "El Vez" is a play on "Elvis."24.177.37.156 (talk) 20:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vez is occasion, not time

message: I would like to restore the images of Graciasland and Graceland. I think it falls well within fair use. The article mentions that the cover art of Graciasland is a play on that of Graceland. I think that mention qualifies as (minimal) critical commentary, which would make these appropriate illustrations. I realize it's a borderline case, but the statement about one cover being a play on the other doesn't mean much without showing the covers, and the nature of the parody is immediately clear when they are placed side by side. - Jmabel | Talk 20:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The images lack the critical commentary necessary for them to be considered fair use per the acceptable uses section, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images: "Cover art from various items, for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary).",  and from the unacceptable uses section, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images 2: "An album cover as part of a discography". Aspects (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Not worth fighting over. If anyone ever properly writes an article here, instead of the slightly-more-than-stub we've got, I'd urge them to get into the issue of visual appropriation and to restore either this or a similar example. - Jmabel | Talk 23:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover art
Talk:Muri, Taraba State

message: I removed the missing article tag on the assumption (how do I verify that? wouldn't it make more sense to tag with the specific encyclopaedia(s)?) that it only referred to the Catholic Encyclopaedia page on the Benedictine abbey, which refers geographically to the other, Alpine Muri, and is already entered as Muri-Gries Fastifex 05:27, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Huyano

message: I have to correct the name of this entry called "Huyano", wich refers to my national traditional music (Perú). The correct name should be "Huayno" NOT "Huyano" Thanks a lot!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.121.14.48 (talk • contribs) on 05:28, 30 April 2006
: Done, redirected to huayno which already existed. -- 62.147.38.108 20:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct name
Talk:Environmental indicator

message: I've made major edits and additions to this page.  Some examples were a bit too specialized to be considered typical environmental indicators considering the field as it has evolved to this point.  I also removed a couple of elements that are more to do with Sustainable Development Indicators. I also try to place Environmental Indicators in the context of a logical framework where sustainable development indicators can be seen as a broader category. I've been involved in Canada's State of Environment and Environmental Indicators programs for about 15 years.  This isn't perfect by any means and I intend to contribute fixes and improvements.  --Dofar (talk) 15:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Habar Awal

message: Habar Awal is one of the subclans of Isaq tribe in Northern Somalia. They settle the historic coastal towns of Bulhar, Berbera, and Zaila. They are perceived to be the royal sublclan of Isaq as a result of the colonial adminstration which favored their towns and assisted the natural progress of their civilization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.191.153.202 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 30 April 2006
Please help expand this article, either by adding notables, sub-clans of ciise muuse in patricular or any of others —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qodaal123 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 9 April 2009
: I would suggest that the list of sub-clans is too long as it is. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 13:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Exosome

message: Not knowing anything of this, I looked around the web for 'exosome'.  It looks to me like there are two conflicting uses of the term in biology.  
One is apparently a small vesicle occurring outside of cells.  This seems to be what the current text of this article is talking about.   Some papers re this meaning: Exosome: from internal vesicle of the multivesicular body to intercellular signaling device and Identification, proteomic profiling, and origin of ram epididymal fluid exosome-like vesicles.
On the otherhand, there seems to be a exosome that is a complex of enzyme molecules which process short RNAs, and may be located in the nucleolus and elsewhere in the cell.  Papers about these:  The human exosome: an autoantigenic complex of exoribonucleases in myositis and scleroderma and  The exosome, a molecular machine for controlled RNA degradation in both nucleus and cytoplasm.
If this is as it appears, the article should make that clear.  Perhaps there should be two articles; if so, each should guide readers to the other.  -R. S. Shaw 05:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two kinds of exosome?
Talk:Los Alamos Ranch School

message: "It was private residential boys school that featured the outdoors and horses (famous alumni included William Burroughs and potentially Gore Vidal)". What does "potentially Gore Vidal" mean? Seems nonsense, nothing about it at Gore Vidal article; will excise. --GangofOne 05:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The article is in serious need of inline references, since the two "external links" have conflicting information. Notably, http://www.losalamoshistory.org/school.htm says the school was "started" in 1917, but http://www.lanl.gov/history/road/school-closes.shtml gives the opening date as 1920: Between 1920 and 1942, about 40 students between the ages of 12 and 16 attended the school annually, paying a tuition averaging $2,400, about $23,000 in today's dollars. --Orlady (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting information
Talk:Weston, Toronto

message: I added a link for Blue22, since there is a separate Wikipedia article for it.--Stetson 06:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates

message: I propose that this article be moved to Weston, Ontario as per Wikipedia:CANSTYLE#Neighbourhoods/communities guidelines as it was a formerly autonomous town that is recognised by Canada Post. DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:CANSTYLE, any place that's recognized by Canada Post as a separate mailing address can have an article title in the "Place, Ontario" format regardless of whether it's an independent municipality or a city neighbourhood. Scarborough, Etobicoke, East York and North York are titled in the "Place, Ontario" format, and they aren't independent cities anymore either. Thornhill is also named in the "Place, Ontario" format, and it's never been a separate municipality. Bearcat (talk) 00:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move suggestion

message: Does anyone have the time to give this article an overhaul regarding the ways links are embedded?  We seem to be using various methods.
*All internal links to other Wikipedia articles should use Wikilinks (like this).
*All external links to other websites should be done using the <ref> tag.
*There should not be a direct link from the body of an article, to an off-site page.  Some users may not want to go off-site without warning, and may presume that any links in the body of tan article will stay within Wikipedia.  Let's not pull surprises on users.
*There should be no links to raw JPGs.  Maps from off-site are usually used on web pages, and we should be linking to those pages.
I could do these changes myself... but not right at the moment.  If nobody else handles it, I'll take care of it later, but I'd be just as happy if someone else jumped in.  Thanks. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to links needed 

message: There needs to be some material added as to why the April 2013 fire was significant. That was the only fire ever in Weston? As it is, it strikes this reader as odd and out of place. Toyokuni3 (talk) 03:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire
Talk:Headquarters Marine Corps

message: In the introductory section of the article, there is a passage that reads:
"HQMC is currently spread throughout the Washington, D.C., Virginia, and Maryland area, to include the Pentagon, Henderson Hall, Marine Barracks, Washington, D.C., Marine Corps Base Quantico, and the Washington Navy Yard."
It should be 'including', not 'to include'. (See this discussion of the two phrases.)
2601:140:8B80:3EF0:7892:6BA6:ADDF:F8DE (talk) 23:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'including' instead of 'to include' in intro section
Talk:William R. Caddy

message: Is it really necessary to list the battles and wars PFC Caddy took part in like this:
World War II
*Pacific War
**Japan campaign
***Volcano and Ryukyu Islands campaign
****Battle of Iwo Jima
It seems a little excessive to me to list all of those different campaigns. I think it would be different if there were multiple bullet points under each additional bullet point, but there is only one bullet point under each bullet point. Each bullet point falls under another bullet point with none in the same column. Why not just list that he took part in World War II, and put Iwo Jima in a bullet underneath that?--NickRich21 (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battles/wars section in infobox
Talk:Best Actor & Best Actress nominations in Star Awards

message: 30.04.2006: Hi, I just identified the 2003 and 2005 winners. Unfortunately I forgot who won in 2004. :) -Linda
I have changed the Best Actress back to Yvonne Lim, its rightful titleholder. Huang Bi Ren in actual fact did not win Best Actress 2007. Someone is vandalizing the page. You can check, Yvonne lim definitely won Best Actress 2007. Please revert any future misdeeds back to the original. Thanks 165.21.155.108 (talk) 07:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Acme Markets

message: I removed the section on Rival stores.  All it was was a list of logos and pictures of other stores that operate in the tri-state area.  I couldn't do a simple "undo", because the person who put it up did it over some six updates.  The rationale is that if your article is about Acme Markets, you don't want to distract the reader away from that subject.  From that standpoint, the logos and photos are entirely unnessary.  If you do wish to include a listing of competitors in the area, perhaps a bullet list under "current operations" would be most appropriate.  Pob lwc!  Bowie60 (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rival Stores 

message: I believe acme the store is not located in looney tunes ville along with wlye coyote  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.188.57.225 (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  headquarters 
Talk:Denver Zephyrs

message: Following patterns established for other (albeit pro) teams, the page should be consolidated under New Orleans Zephyrs with redirects from the Denver Bears and the Denver Zephyrs.  Pattern appears to be that the current name of the team has a page housing content referencing team history and is redirected to from any searches with previous team names.  See St Louis Rams (formerly Los Angeles Rams), Oakland Raiders (formerly Los Angeles Raiders) and Los Angeles Dodgers (formerly Brooklyn Dodgers) for examples.
*I would have to agree, both the Denver Bears and Denver Zephyrs articles should be merged into the New Orleans Zephyrs article, since they are the same team, just with name and location changes. Blarney Fife 21:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *More recent precedent in WP:Baseball is to have new articles when a team relocates. Other then the move of a franchise from one city to another, the teams have no connection to one another. New Orleans doesn't recognize their Denver or Kansas City heritage. Thusly, the Denver Bears/Zephyrs should have an article separate from the New Orleans Zephyrs/Baby Cakes. I have made such a change grouping the Denver teams here and the NO teams at New Orleans Baby Cakes. By 2020, there should be a new article when the team moves from NO to Wichita (Wichita PCL team). NatureBoyMD (talk) 16:13, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Super Mario Adventures

message: Will whoever's constantly putting in that "villain wins" nonsense please stop it?! This is NOT a "villains wins" comic!! - Nintendo Maximus
And the toilet training stuff!
Oh, hey N.M. And who's the guy who replaced the main image with the box cover of Mario Party 2? (Plainnym 20:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably the same idiot who refuses to accept the fact that Bowser doesn't win in this comic. - Nintendo Maximus
Bowser almost never wins. I'm glad this aticle was tagged. Probably the same guy who took up half the article with unthumbnailed pages, too. (Plainnym 15:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please stop

message: Please revert your edits now! J4lambert (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible vandalism
Talk:Deku Baba

message: This article, along with other tLoz articles desperately needs a picture. Scepia 19:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: For one, why is this article called Deku Baba, if it covers all Baba Plants? Can I rename it Baba Plant? Also, I don't recall anything stating Deku Bababs evolved into Boko Babas. Might be true, but for all we know, they already existed way earlier or are the evolved Hebi Babas. DreamingLady 17:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I'd like to rename this article and change a few things
Talk:Robert G. Robinson

message: We have the gravestone at ANC showing 1894 as the YOB. But the ArlingtonCemetery dot net website gives us 1896 per "Lore of the Corps" by Keith A. Milks. Since we have WP:V per the gravestone I've posted 1894 as the YOB.  – S. Rich (talk) 03:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  YOB
Talk:Svobodny Cosmodrome

message: :Regarding the template  used on this page, please join the discussion at Template talk:Spaceport#Shorter names.
:(sdsds - talk) 23:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shorter names in Spaceport template 
Talk:Death Mountain

message: Where exactly in the Death Mountain area (Twilight Princess) can you see the supposed entrance to Dodongo's Cavern? I've been looking for days and I haven't been able to find what even looks like it... Sincerely, Thrashmeister {U|T|C} 04:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dodongo's Cavern?
Talk:Clue Club

message: I was thinking of helping out with this article. right now there's no citations. it's like the show may never have existed. but, it's also spoken in an overly positive tone (advert tag). so, that's tricky. we want to prove it's real and be a bit more sober about describing it's qualities. can we demonstrate that it's even notable? that title card looks pretty legit. ok. well, I suck at citing but I hope this helps anyone who wants to help. Codigo'll aka Huh? 18:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  so 

message: Why is the premiere date so rushed? Because this show came earlier than other 1976-77 Saturday morning efforts. --73.184.6.244 (talk) 02:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rushed premiere? 

message: I'm not sure why there is insistence on misspelling the name of the Basset hound character, when it is obvious from the depicted title card at  that there's an "h" in it, the bcdb.com entry is itself in need of proofreading, and sources that unthinkingly used bcdb.com's text without looking at the title card are themselves in need of proofreading. I agree it's an utterly absurd situation when every secondary source perpetuates the same patent ("patent" in the sense of being obvious on its face and not "latent") spelling error, but a patent spelling error it is. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Whimper", not "Wimper"
Talk:Gravity boots

message: Searched for Gravity Boots and was redirected to an article on bondage, I do not beleive such an automatic redirect would be made. A google search reveals the correct meaning to be some kind of exercise equipment which allows one to hang upside down. Even if the other usage is also correct, there should be a disamiguation page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.245.93 (talk • contribs) 
Why does Uri Geller need to generate new ideas? And doesn't Dan Brown get all his ideas off other people's books, so why does he need gravity boots? Georgeslegloupier 03:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Searched

message: To the person who added this: I'm reverting your edit because you provide no link or other context. If gravity boots fit into "Freedom", then by all means please go ahead and put the information into the article in the correct context. But an unliked phrase plunked in the middle of the See also section ain't gonna cut it. Twisted86 05:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: George Michael clip "Freedom"

message: I think whoever put this in did so as a joke.  This article is about exercise equipment, the Star Trek reference is to a hypothetical boot that would allow one to counteract zero-g.  This is not a pop-culture reference to the item under discussion.  If you want a pop culture reference, how about Richard Gere using them in "American Gigalo?" Kjdamrau 15:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I edited that to point out that it's not the same kind of gravity boot, but I think that the whole section should be eliminated. Maybe stick it under Artificial gravity? 68.0.213.222 13:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pop culture

message: These are probably added as people think of them, I think it would benefit the article to date the release of all the various media with references to gravity boots, so that we can arrange them in order of appearance. I am also wondering, whether it would violate any copyright laws to create a montage of all the various clips (in order) from these media where gravity boots are demonstrated and/or mentioned, since they are relatively short clips out of the media in which they are shown. Tyciol (talk) 01:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arranging pop culture references

message: This is clearly a copyrighted work and I have not seen any copyright release from the author. Does one exist?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aneides822 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Betty & Veronica cartoon-- permission by author secured?
Talk:Bob Stump

message: Can someone give context on that last sentence? Representatives aren't required to live in the district they represent. What's the issue there / how can we clarify?
dmesg—Preceding undated comment added by Dmesg (talk • contribs) 07:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: I just added to thetop of the page the two parties that he served for. - Jibajabba—Preceding undated comment added by Jibajabba (talk • contribs) 22:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Parties
File talk:FD-L-WC Mexique.jpg

message: There are hundreds of this kind of amateur-produced circuits, is there a reason to publish their pictures here? 62.78.204.68 07:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This circuit was produced and sold by Ludodélire (Formula Dé's original publisher), as part of their Formule Dé - World Championship expansion set. —MJBurrage • TALK • 14:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Michael Raoul Duval

message: Duval was indeed notable, as he was a senior staff member of Ford's White House.  See external link (President Ford Library papers).   --Gnostic13 07:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled