Talk:Per Fine Ounce

message: Due to the fact that this book was never published and current Wikipedia Fair Use image restrictions prevent any other images from being used (including one of the author), no image is available for this article. 23skidoo 22:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No image possible

message: The following link has been temporarily removed from the article as the website is currently offline and pending renewal:
* 007Forever.com article on Per Fine Ounce
Please do not mark this article as "uncited" as the above link was the citation, and will be reinstated once the 007forever website is back online.
23skidoo 19:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Placeholder

message: Would it not be possible to credit the article that much of the information for this piece is taken from, ie 'Gold Dust', issue two of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang Magazine, http://www.007.info/ClubMagazine.asp. Thanks! The writer of that article. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.209.112.80 (talk) 22:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crediting source 

message: Fair enough - but whoever added the information here from my article would have known this! 'Gold Dust' by Jeremy Duns, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang magazine, Issue 2 (Winter 2005), pages 39-47, see http://www.007.info/ClubMagazine.asp for more info.
The 007 Forever article was my starting point for research, but I discoverd a lot more than was there. The most important information in my article has not been mentioned - I found draft pages of Per Fine Ounce, and in them we learn that the Double O Section has closed down and Bond quits MI6! This, of course, prefigures both LICENCE RENEWED by John Gardner and the film LICENCE TO KILL.
I don't have time, but there are a few inaccuracies in this Wikipedia piece. I don't know if Jenkins' contract was never signed - the copy I found wasn't, but that's a very different thing. What's the source for Benson saying the book might be in IFP's archives? I think he was asked if he had asked to read the book in the IFP archives, and he said no, he hadn't. Again, not quite the same. One of the things I found hardest about researching this book was the Chinese whispers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.209.112.236 (talk) 21:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just for the record, I originated this article based upon the section in "The Bond Files" by Andy Lane and Paul Simpson, and other material was added later. Is there material that has been copied word for word from your article? If so then that's a copyvio and it needs to be either reworded or removed. It's interesting to hear others have seen the PFO manuscript as the only other person known to have accessed it is Raymond Benson according to his interview on the subject. The original source for the Raymond Benson information is an online interview he gave for the 007Forever -- see the discussion marked "Placeholder" above -- which was originally cited, but unfortunately the 007Forever site appears to have gone away so the link had to be removed. Did you ever find any indication that PFO was intended as a Robert Markham release? 23skidoo 22:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  KKBB article