lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 20

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 

message: Wasn't there a John Travolta sketch in S20E03 called "Dracula Is Gay" that was scrubbed from all of the rebroadcasts, DVDs, and so forth?  I even noticed it was deleted from the Comedy Central broadcasts around 2003.  The sole reference I can find to it is my memory and the JT SNL transcripts site.  I am curious whether NBC has been trying to whitewash the episodes of anything that might be considered offensive; if so, maybe the article could use a footnote. -Rolypolyman (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Dracula Is Gay sketch, episode 3
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 21

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 23

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 24

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Could we brown-nose Jimmy Fallon more? We put "break-out star" by his name? He did Fever Pitch, and has appeared in a few movies here and there. I don't think we should favor him over Parnell and Sanz.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.73.75.69 (talk) 23:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Breakout Star?
Talk:Sturm separation theorem

message: This proof of the theorem is faulty. The statement "Since u and v are linearly independent it follows that the Wronskian W[u,v] must satisfy W[u,v](x) !=  0 for all x where the differential equation is defined" is not correct. The Wronskian can be zero at a finite number of points, it just cannot be zero everywhere. Take for example, the time-independent Schrodinger equation with an infinite square well, V(x) = 0 on 0<x<π, ∞ elsewhere. The solutions u(x)=sin(x) and v(x)=sin(3x) are clearly linearly independent, but their Wronskian is zero in the middle of the well at x=π/2. Other parts of the proof fall apart after this, but I wanted to make sure I did not misunderstand some of the assumptions here before proposing a major rewrite of this page.
Rjones30 (talk) 14:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Critique of proof
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 26

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 25

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 27

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 28

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't know whether the new site format has anything to do w/ it, but this gap doesn't appear to have an easy fix after looking at the code.  I'd try it but I'm afraid I'd just make it worse.  Any1 out there have any ideas? JoeWiki1969 (talk) 00:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  BIG gap between heading & list of cast
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 29

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Namasia District

message: i'm no expert, but isn't the "gi" missing from the chinese there? 66.30.47.138 (talk) 02:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: after a lot of googling, i see that BOTH VERSIONS are in use!  what's the deal here?  is one the older form, using some archaic pronunciation?  or is there, indeed, a char for "gi" which should squeeze in there in such cases?  66.30.47.138 (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nangisalu
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 30

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 03:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lusk, Dublin

message: I appreciate the sentiment of the article, very refreshing. Unfortunately though, it's hardly encyclopaedic. I'll try to edit it down tomorrow. 83.70.178.165 (talk) 00:15, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nozomi Sasaki (voice actress)

message: The 2nd reference is wrong. There are 2 girls named Nozomi Sasaki. You can tell because the Nozomi Sasaki referenced here has a birthday at 1983 while the 2nd Nozomi Sasaki is a Japanese gravure model whose birthday is 1988. It is stated on her official blog: http://ameblo.jp/sasaki-nozomi/ 99.132.162.242 (talk) 22:38, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header
Talk:Crocodile (locomotive)

message: There were some Sulzer-engined diesel Crocodiles built by Les Ateliers Metallurgiques, Nivelles, Belgium, in 1949 for service in Bolivia; seemingly at least one of them still exists. See . From what I can see, these appear to have been true (articulated) Crocodiles. I haven't added this to the article itself because I feel it would need a bit of rewording to encompass non-electric Crocodiles. I doubt there'd be any point in spinning diesel examples off into a separate article, though - were there any others? Grover Snodd (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diesel Crocodiles 

message: Can someone please confirm the identify of these two images, particularly the jackshafts and rods, and whether they're Ce / Be and Ce 6/8II or Ce 6/8III. Which is the earlier and later type? ThanksAndy Dingley (talk) 13:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jackshaft variations
Talk:Marah (Bible)

message: In the article, it is stated: "There is nothing necessarily miraculous about the sweetening of the water, since there is a type of barberry which grows in the desert and has the herbal property of sweetening brackish water".  I do believe this wikipedia article severely misses something vital: namely the brackish water sources common to both the Sinai and the Negev desert which are processed at the Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research in the Negev.  There is (i) this Brackish water with 1/10 of the salinity of the Mediterranean, (ii) salt water from the sea itself and (iii) Artesian wells of drinkable sweet water.
There is popular science book by Gerhard Herm, a german journalist specialized in Documentations of History.  From the reference: Die Phönizier. Das Purpurreich der Antike, Rowohlt, Reinbek 1987, ( ): it is pointed out that Moses' stick or rod used to extract the sweet waters from the (brackish) bitter waters was actually an upside down funnel with a long stem - giving the appearance of a stick or rod from a distance.  The bottom part of that stick would "grab" the sweet water from the Artesian well source before it mixed with the brackish or salty waters.  At the top of the stem comes out the sweet water separated from the bitter waters. That's your "purification" process, not the plant mentioned in the wikipedia site.  When you mixed waters of different salinities, you eventually get a homogeneous whole but it takes a while, depending on the interplay of mixing and anti-mixing agents.  The short delay in time gives an opportunity for Moses' stick to get a hold of the sweet water.  The trouble is that this source is in German only and not translated into English - but still valid nonetheless.
The Hebrews would have committed this event to memory via an oral culture which did not get written down in full until the Babylonian exile.  However, by then, this simple upside down funnel would have been simplified to a mere stick or rod. (The Babylonians had no use for this simple but effective "technology" because they could get plenty of sweet water from the Tigris and Euphrates.)   As for the addition of special herbs to purify water, this is an old trick, but I doubt that it is effective enough.  Potatoes take of salt from an over-salted soup or sauce, and there are many other herbs that draw salt out of a high salinity water, but the amount you can take out this way is small, and I doubt very much you get the magnesium salts.  Finally,  the Desert Institute in the Negev has gone a long way in exploiting this brackish water.
I suggest adding some of this material itself to the article. I have given you the reference.  If there are no objections, I can do it myself.TonyMath (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Moses' stick?

message: I suggest to delete the quote in the beginning of the article or at least to relocate it to the body of the article, since I don't think that an intro may consist quotes. 85.65.73.40 (talk) 05:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The intro of the article
Talk:Muskmelon

message: Why is this linking to Melon, and not to Muskmelon? Badagnani 04:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lance Price

message: Would it not be possible to create a new Category 'British Political Diarists'?Musungu jim (talk) 12:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Category 

message: I don't think I can recall a Wikipedia article that beats this one for lack of balance, perspective or even humility.
I would ask for it to be deleted if I knew how to Cannonmc (talk) 15:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps a new category of Hagiographies of New Labour Spin Doctors 
Talk:Connecticut Post

message: When did it change names from Bridgeport Post to Connecticut Post? /84.216.254.98 (talk) 13:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of names, when?
Talk:Rainbow shark

message: Regarding the reqphoto tag. There's a photo on the German page, if anyone can be bothered commonsizing it. —Pengo 01:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The image name in German wikipedia is Fransenlipper.JPG.  A user in German wikipedia could assist in moving this image to commons.  Thanks in advance. - Dragonbite 04:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Photograph request tag removed; obtained the GFDL-image from German wikipedia via Wikimedia commons. - Dragonbite 05:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo req

message: why is it inapropriat for the article?--HighFlyingFish (talk) 15:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Listing a status of "Least Concern" implies that the species has been assessed by the IUCN, and is included on the Red List in that category. This species isn't included on the IUCN Red List. Conservation status should only be included for species where conservation is an issue. A lot of articles (currently c. 600) have used "LC" or "secure" on articles where they don't belong, and these are being phased out. --Stemonitis (talk) 08:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   conservation tag 

message: I've seen some confusing information in the aquarium section. This part makes no sense:"No actual breed sequence has been documented in an aquarium setting. Although known to be egg-layers, reproduction of rainbow sharks is difficult in an aquarium setting." So, is it bred in the aquarium setting? Or not? Honestly, I don't know what to do about it.SuperPayara 02:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Information
Talk:Project Adventure

message: Way too much of this was done by MattMorin, whom I found to have interest in Project Adventure.
https://workshops.pa.org/author/mmorin/
This is probably the reason this article is so unobjective; how should one handle this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1017:B00E:2883:D1C0:DEEE:8FBC:94D6 (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Caproni Ca.165

message: Ok.....so apparently a 10-year old boy did a project for an art class and it wound up being a picture in this article.  There are almost certainly no free images available for this plane so we have to make do with this crudely drawn charicature which may well have been drawn on a napkin.  Are there ANY free images of this aircraft?  But hey, I guess we'll have to take what we can get. Antimatter--talk-- 04:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Quite a unique looking aircraft...it kind of reminds me of one the Japanese made towards the end of the war. Antimatter--talk-- 17:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: As I have just come across a very informative article, I intend to rewrite this article. Any comments? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. Antimatter--talk-- 21:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite intended
Talk:The Easy Riders

message: An entry was made on my user talk page by Alvestrand saying I should "at least put SOME content into it to avoid the  speedy deletion tag".  I'm attempting to move the discussion here as this seems more appropriate.  I don't think many users seeing a db-band tag will go to an unrelated user page for discussion.
Before I added the stub, other pages linked to one of "this article does not exist - do you want to create it" pages.  I ran into this empty link as I had wanted to find out information on this band.  I thought I was improving Wikipedia by linking to a very informative biography on Yahoo music and also an article an AMG.  I also put in a hopefully useful disambiguation.  Any future users looking for information on this band are a click away.  Of course, the linked content could change or disappear.  I know scarce little about this band so can't add non-linked content and certainly don't want to plagiarize the linked articles.  But, with the stub in place, a better-informed future user could easily add such content.  For a band that hasn't been active in half a century, it might take a while for that user to arrive.  As Wikipedia is a communal effort, I don't think the onus should be on individual users to get any particular article beyond stub status.  If this were the case, there wouldn't be so many stubs, one would think.
By all means, if this article does not meet Wikipedia guidelines, remove it, though I think this would be a disservice to other users. --Wantnot 04:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Keziah

message: Opinions sought - I counted the number of occurrences of Kezia in specimen years from Ancestry's website - does this count as banned original research?  Anyone else could go and check it. seglea (talk) 23:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: (" How to hack ") phone /www.hacks,dow.com
what could she be playing on her phone... Hackers(e) (s)
she is not gonna like (?)/www.hacks,dow.com
-dot.com-  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.148.25 (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   PHONE HACKS