lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stagecoach in Cheltenham

message: I changed the final destination link on the Number 10 route from Lower Tuffley (page is non-existant) to just Tuffley which is a page already linked to from the Districts of Gloucester category and which will be created soon. Arawn (talk) 19:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuffley 

message: Updated the route section to remove routes not operated by Stagecoach in Cheltenham and to include day time frequencies for all routes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.27.138.92 (talk) 02:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Routes
Talk:Jason mirabilis

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:13, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Eubranchus agrius

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Fiona pinnata

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 23:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at this Fiona pinnata article a few days ago and reviewed the copying issue.  There is NO PROBLEM here;  only a minimal amount of material was contributed by that single editor to this article, and that has all been edited away.  This article seems fine in that respect. doncram (talk) 03:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes that is true. Now it is fine. The material that was copied verbatim was removed back in April of 2009. Invertzoo (talk) 00:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Tularia bractea

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pseudovermis hancocki

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 11:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Zulfiqar Ali Khan

message: , over five years ago, with this edit, you added that the subject was a "Punjabi-Pathan". Please provide the relevant quote, as it seems the cited source doesn't mention this detail. BTW, I have only a snippet view of the source, but its page no. 103 does mention that a different officer was a Pathan:
 NitinMlk (talk) 23:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Talk:Asaph Fipke

message: sèvèral days. i mèt him. he told mè he is homosèxual & Currently Dating Matt Hill in Sècrètly. he Actually tèll mè this. So put it on here. Btw Hè has an grèat voicè as Billy Rèx
Sincerly Asaph Fipke's Cousin  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.188.106.30 (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asaph Fipke Reveal Himself as Homosexual. 
Talk:Reichskommissariat Niederlande

message: The page does not describe Dutch police structure.Xx236 (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch police
Talk:Neanderthal interaction with Cro-Magnons

message: #REDIRECT Talk:Neanderthal extinction
This article has been created in januari 2008 to replace a previous article of the same name, that evolved into Neanderthal extinction hypotheses. Rokus01 (talk) 22:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

message: Neanderthals seems to have relied on robust bodies to overcome game, rather as modern footballers rely on robustness. From time to time, neanderthals may have found themselves with more meat than they could eat before it went bad, and sapiens at certain times of the year may have found themselves with more freshwater fish than they could eat before it went bad. It is possible that neanderthals with a glut of meat may have invited neighbouring sapiens to share a feast, and in return, sapiens with a seasonal glut of fish may have invited neighbouring neanderthals to share a feast of fish. Fish bones would have fallen into a sapiens midden regardless of who ate the fish.
Such exchanges, if they ever happened, fit the idea of behavioural modernity, and would have allowed both groups to exploit resources more efficiently. Such exchanges, if they ever happened, could have included exchanges of young women, resulting in some interbreeding.
David Erskine124.179.1.30 (talk) 10:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your evidence for neanderthals having surplus non-fish meat and sapiens having surplus fish meat? Is this simply a conjecture on your part? — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 02:28, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pleistocene Trade 

message: Sorry to say, but this page should definitely be part of the Neanderthal Extinction Hypotheses page, or even the Multiregional Hypothesis page; there's no need to be having the same info (or arguments) in 2 places... Spettro9 (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neanderthal extinction hypotheses merge 

message: This is probably an interesting article, It's hard to tell as the language is so awkward. I assume the author is not a native English speaker. Any chance someone knowledgeable could rewrite this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianerc (talk • contribs) 02:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write
Talk:Reichskommissariat

message: What was the name for the Reichskommissariat that was to rule overGerman-occupied Britain? Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 15:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reichskommissariat Britannnica? 

message: Please someone make this page, I need research for my history project about Denmark 32.208.245.86 (talk) 23:39, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reichskommissariat Denmark
Talk:Reichskommissariat Norwegen

message: Isn't the translation of Reichskommissariat Norwegen into English as Realm's Commissionerate of Norway?
ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! (talk) 03:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that this translation is necessary. There is no reason why the sentence: literally "Realm Commissariat of Norway", is needed. Reich can be translated as Empire as well as Realm, but it just doesn't need to be translated. People know what it is. 'Third Reich' for example, is widely understood to mean Nazi Germany in WW2. Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Note, that I only did the revert to "revision 492470831" restoring the translation because the prose leading up to the translated material had not been altered and the text made little sense. I have no strong feelings either way as to necessity of the translation but I do think the text should make some sort on sense.  --Thefrood (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  No it isn't. There probably doesn't need to be a translation, but if there were "Reichs Kommisariat of Norway" would be it. Reich is not normally translated nor is kommissar or its derivates in English. There is a german version of this article but I had no luck with the new wikidata version of the interwiki links.  If you were to persist, "Imperial Commissioner, Norway" would be a likely Anglicisation. Lycurgus (talk) 07:37, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realm's Commissionerate of Norway?
Talk:Phylliroidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Phylliroe

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: P. Bucephalum appears to be the nudibranch described in the opening essay in the popular book "The Medusa and the Snail" by Lewis Thomas.  The essay describes a remnant of the medusa attaching itself to the nudibranch's jaw, and then producing offspring, while this article states only that the nudibranch consumes the medusa.  If the essay is incorrect, wouldn't it be worth stating that as a notable misconception about P. Bucephalum?  On the other hand, if the medusa does survive and parasitize the nudibranch, then the description in this article is incomplete.
Though well-known, the essay is not in itself a citable scientific source.  Thus I am not going to change this article unless/until I can find something citable that resolves the question.  I'm just posting this in the hope that an expert in the field does have such a source.  
Swartzer (talk) 04:44, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Medusa and the Snail"?
Talk:Squeegee

message: this article is linked to german wiki to:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakel wich is not precise.
it should be linked to:http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abzieher_%28Putzger%C3%A4t%29
if anyone would change this,
thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.54.54.22 (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: German wiki

message: I removed the part about common use in Israel and the link to Rabbi Aviner, not sure what the deal is here, but not really necessary here. Thanks, --Tom 20:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that sponga was deleted and redirected here? Anyways, --Tom 20:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: sponga reference

message: I am looking at the Russian translation, and see that most likely the word ракель is only used in Russian in the context of the section "Printing and photography" and not as an instrument for cleaning windows or floors. And the literal term "резиновая швабра" used for the name of the instrument. Looking at the German article I see that probably the same is true as well. Are there any facilities in Wikipedia to handle such partial translations? Yurivict (talk) 17:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inter-wiki links are incorrect? 

message: Didn't put up the banner, but do it. Having two different pages is just silly. MrNerdHair (talk) 02:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Squeegee (floor)]]
Talk:Phylliroe bucephala

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Order of battle at the Battle of Tsushima

message: Second Division of the Russian Fleet was under command of the First Rank Captain Vladimir Iosifovich Ber 1st. Rear-Admiral Baron Felkerzam died a couple of days before the battle. Though the flag of Rear-Admiral was not lowered and most of the Fleet didn't know about his death, he was not in command of the ship Oslyabya and of the Second Division. --Yuriy Lapitskiy ~ 20:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Division
Talk:20th Chess Olympiad

message: This Olympiad is notable for Black's use of the Benko Gambit. It scored ridiculously high: in 16 games black scored 10 wins and six draws. The problem is that the only source I have is from the book The Benko Gambit Revealed and I'm no good at citing books. If anyone's interested, here's the link to a Google Books thing. http://books.google.ca/books?id=oXIyYqxvbjIC&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=Skopje+Benko&source=web&ots=nl_SuIJ9wQ&sig=W_SGjt0DTL91Dc2WZk0nrsn8NgY&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result#PPA30,M1
24.226.77.23 (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benko Gambit
Talk:Silver Pit

message: In the Silverpit crater article it refers to the Silver Pit as something known to fishermen etc.  Nothing is said of that here.  It would be good to see whatever makes the Silver Pit significant from a fishing point of view as well as the geology.  This would make it stand alone as a separate page much better, as it should.  Some kind of fishing references, opinion or comment would be good- eg who might fish there and for what?  Do we have any idea how long this feature has been recognised for?  The Silverpit crater is a feature which is actually underneath a huge layer of sediment, wheras the Silver Pit is a feature visible on the surface of the sediment, if I understand this correctly.  A picture/map which shows the Silver Pit as fishermen might see it and perhaps another which shows its relationship with the Silverpit Crater would be good.
IceDragon64 (talk) 20:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures, Maps, Relationship with Silverpit Crater
Talk:Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment

message: I fixed a few typos and link format.  The page needs work.  I'm not sure what the value added is here that isn't already on the CCME website itself.  The coverage on this page is uneven, dealing only with two of several task groups.  There could be some added value in providing more historical material than is currently detailed on the CCME website as well as connections with, for example, International Joint Commission, as well as other Canadian Councils, i.e. CC Resource Ministers and CC Forestry Ministers that are rather more difficult to find information on.
Yak9 (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: These task groups no longer exist within CCME. I'm new to editing and don't want to do anything that will be flagged as inappropriate. Is it okay for me to just delete this whole section and revise it with current information? Puddlewise (talk) 17:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Task groups are inaccurate and out of date 

message: I've updated the references so that they point to the current CCME website and added a reference to a federal government website that discusses CCME as well. I'm not sure if I did this properly and welcome feedback if I've made a mistake.
Puddlewise (talk) 16:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated and added references
Talk:Maravich (book)

message: This is so much like an advertisment, I'd like to delete it in its entireness!
:Cleaned up the page, it was comically POV pro-Maravich. —Onomatopoeia (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Could someone please italicize this article's title?Hoops gza (talk) 06:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Mkdwtalk 06:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Duff, Saskatchewan

message: (Cocopie (talk) 21:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Vibriocin

message: I'd say that the final statement about diversity is not so much original research as an educated speculation highlighting the connection and equivalence of this (vibriocins, limited diversity characterized) with another topic (colicins, relatively well studied, vast diversity known).  It doesn't constitute original research - more research would be needed to conclusively demonstrate such an equivalence, and it would be quite interesting in fact because it would take observations from mostly gut organisms who occasionally encounter water to mostly water organisms who occasionally encounter guts, and would start to draw parallels between organisms in mostly fluid to mostly particle (more structured) habitats.  Of course, anyone doing such research (and I know of nobody, at the moment) would be foolish to publish first in wikipedia.  So, the speculation is not research, but a hint of a connection between the topics.Bckirkup (talk) 17:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled