Talk:CNCD Decision 323/2006

message: We mention a shopping center being built right by St Joseph's. Is it this project, now under way (crane in photo)? - Jmabel | Talk 03:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Joseph's

message: Hi. User:Altermediaro (presumably a representative of the far right-wing "guerrilla" media agency, Altermedia Romania), keeps reverting to a POV version of the "Civic Media petition" section of this article. As it stands, I have a number of issues with this version:
*Organisations vs NGOs - I think "organisations" is better than NGOs. NGOs is a term used in Romanian that immediately connotes a sense of representing "civil society", struggling against the "hegemony of the goverment"; the term also has an anti-communist connotation. I think it's being heavily misused, to the extent where every single organisation and pressure group starts calling itself an "NGO". I really don't see the point of calling the 150 associations which signed the petition "NGOs", when it is already clear that they are non-government. A lot of them are too small to qualify as "NGOs" as part of contemporary usage.
*The inclusion of anti-abortion organisations: I have no problem with including these organisations per se, but what strikes me as POV is their classification as "child-care and children rights organisations". The anti-abortion movement in Romania is rather small, much smaller than in the US, for example. These organisations hence represent fringe views, and are in no way "children rights organisations" (in English, "children's rights" almost always refers to the rights of born children, not to pro-life organisations).
*The inclusion of Napoleon Săvescu, president of Dacia Revival Society - again, no problem per se, but Savescu in no way represents a mainstream view, and I don't think it's justified to call him a "high-profile personality" (maybe in right-wing Altermedian circles, but definitely not in broader Romanian society).
*The classification of the ROST Association, Altermedia Association and the Romanian Association for Heritage as just "right wing" - I think calling these organisations "right-wing" is too general, considering their rather extremist, fringe position. ROST Association is a Christian-nationalist association, and it was described by Evenimentul Zilei as "marked by the ideals of Romanian interbellum legionarism". Just read ROST Magazine to see what their views are - see , for example, a homophobic article titled "Why homosexuals don't have a right to be on the street". I think views like this can be described as "far-right (nationalist)" rather than just right wing. Altermedia, despite its neutral-sounding name, is the Romanian division of a worldwide white supremacist media agency self-describing as "Worldwide news for people of European descent". In both Romanian and English versions, it frequently makes anti-Semitic, anti-gay and anti-minority statements. The Romanian Association for Heritage, led by Artur Silvestri, is perhaps the most moderate of these, although its bulletin, Analize şi fapte, also adopts a Christian-nationalist point of view, and it has advocated far-right positions before. For this reason, I think the label "far-right nationalist organisations" is fair.
Thanks,  Ronline ✉ 07:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altermediaro's contributions 

message: Hello again,
It's almost one year since i didn't log in to my en.wp account. 
I hope you know by the date that the case trial is over, the Supreme Court dismissed CNCD's decision. See here ICCJ: Prezenta simbolurilor religioase in scoli este legala and here Comunicat al “Coalitiei pentru Respectarea Sentimentului Religios”. Maybe you could update the article accordingly.
In the meantime i have learned who really WP is, who has the hands on it and that explains to me this harsh leftist, pollitically correct attitude. I am not interested anymore in it. Have a nice life. Altermediaro (talk) 06:36, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  my last talk edit 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on CNCD Decision 323/2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070102035609/http://www.romania.indymedia.org/ro/2006/11/1713.shtml to http://romania.indymedia.org/ro/2006/11/1713.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070109021730/http://www.patriarhia.ro/Stiri/2006/115.html to http://www.patriarhia.ro/Stiri/2006/115.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070901142736/http://romania.indymedia.org/ro/2005/04/772.shtml to http://romania.indymedia.org/ro/2005/04/772.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on CNCD Decision 323/2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007233054/http://www.evz.ro/article.php?artid=277943 to http://www.evz.ro/article.php?artid=277943
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified