Talk:CinemaScope

message: Since the proper, trademarked name is spelled with a capital S in the middle (CinemaScope) shouldn't that be the main page?  A redirect could be made from Cinemascope to CinemaScope. --Jeremy Butler 01:04, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --KJBracey 20:47, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know why this picture is missing?  I have had 2 goes at trying to upload it as both Scope_image.jpg and Scope_Image.jpg.  Neither work.  Also: How do you make the pictures a little bigger? 86.134.123.38 16:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a clue here.  I am actually signed in as I B Wright, yet only my IP address appears on the comment. 86.134.123.38 16:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cracked how to make them bigger.  Still can't get the third one to work. I B Wright 16:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Picture 

message: The article on Henri Poutine says he invented the anamorphic widescreen process that led to CinemaScope, yet he's not mentioned in the article. Does anyone know why not? Too small a role, or what?(Don't ask me - I simply happened upon his article.) Lawikitejana 00:56, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be sneaky vandalism. Compare with Henri Chretien. In any case, I've AfD'd the article. Girolamo Savonarola 10:23, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henri Poutine? 

message: :Image:Fox-CinemaScope.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Fox-CinemaScope.jpg

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose: WP:MOSTM permits Camel case titles where this aids clarity, as here. --DAJF (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: What happened to the "Films shot in CinemaScope" category?  Was it eliminated deliberately or by error?Foofbun (talk) 00:51, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What happened to the "Films shot in CinemaScope" category?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on CinemaScope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060410201741/http://jkor.com:80/peter/scopehist.html to http://jkor.com/peter/scopehist.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Despite technical differences between two CinemaScope formats, both belong to the same movie studio, 20th Century Fox. Does CinemaScope 55 meet WP:PRODUCT guideline? Shall we merge Cinemascope 55 into this article? Why or why not? George Ho (talk) 09:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 21:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[CinemaScope 55]] 

message: CinemaScope is the name of the process including the sound tracks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8070:21A2:A700:9284:DFF:FEF5:C9F8 (talk) 11:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  not just a lens series 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Cinescope and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 5#Cinescope until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 13:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cinescope" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]