lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gorilla Project

message: I'm going to be working on this for a while, getting sources and stuff together.  Mysticprophecyofthedemonknight 04:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  alright 

message: It is important to include the rural communities effected by this project (primarily Brule and Spink Townships.).  The project itself takes a significant 2000 acres of farmland out of production.  Residents of these farmlands are outnumbered (and outvoted) by residents of the larger settled communities. Llcowell (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional information on communities effected
Talk:Jack Carson

message: Article says, "In 1962, while rehearsing the Broadway play Critics Choice, he collapsed and was subsequently diagnosed with stomach cancer."  IBDB says Critics Choice ran on Broadway 12/14/1960 - 5/27/1961.  Please clarify.  Possibly he was rehearsing for an LA area production of the play, or even the film version (released April 13, 1963).  Michaelcarraher
I've reworded it to reflect the AP press account.Stembark (talk) 19:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: What can be done about the TV-hosting paragraph? It seems chronologically out of place in the "early years" section, but it's quite brief and doesn't seem to merit its own section.Jcejhay (talk) 19:56, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a "Television" section with information about two other programs. Eddie Blick (talk) 03:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph about 1950s TV show
Talk:Leader of the Opposition (Manitoba)

message: Following the 1920 election, the Conservatives remained the official opposition despite having less seats than the Farmers who were mostly independent. The Conservative Leader did not win his seat so I don't know who served as Leader of the Opposition. But reference to the Conservatives being the official opposition is made in a ruling by Nova Scotia Speaker Murray Scott as a precedent in a ruling on the status of the official opposition. 
http://novascotia.ca/news/release/?id=19990908003  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.236.178.78 (talk) 06:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burton Mere Wetlands

message: Apart from a recently added mention of the fire on the Neston reedbeds, this article (as its current title suggests) refers exclusively to the Burton Mere part of the much larger RSPB Dee Estuary - Burton Mere Wetlands reserve. Should we create a new article for the Dee Estuary section(s), or broaden the scope of this article (and possibly rename it)? For context, the full RSPB reserve runs beyond Parkgate on the English side of the Dee, and all the way out to the Point of Ayr on the Welsh side (see MAGIC map). Dave.Dunford (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope and extent of reserve
Talk:List of people from Manitoba

message: I'm not a hardcore enough Wikipedian (yet?) to decide this, but should Lieutenant-Governors be in the list of politicians?  They aren't in the strictest definition, as they are appointed representatives of the Queen.  I also don't think they're notable in Wikipedia terms, as the position of Lieutenant-General on its own doesn't make one notable.HuntClubJoe (talk) 00:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Beverly Hills Chihuahua

message: I beleive the article was protected in October of 2008. If this is so, would it not be fruitful to unprotect it for some time, and if vandalism increases re-protect the page? Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Protection (revisited) 

message: Why the hell is this page edit-protected? I was going to add a note saying some people were attributing the film's unexpected success to the stock market crash a week or two earlier. People were using the movie to escape their worries. (And yeah, I do have sources.) Also, I cannot be the only person who heard about this. --71.131.153.174 (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stock market crash 

message: 4 is here when I made it!!! Woothero (talk) 03:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 IS HERE
Talk:Mincome

message: Whitney Light: "Researchers Examine the Town With No Poverty". The Uniter 13, 1 December 2005 is a broken link. I couldn't find the article again. 
Phenophexadin (talk) 00:41, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

message: So how much money did the get? AxelBoldt (talk) 04:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to have varied person to person. You had to be under the poverty line to get anything at all. From the report "a family with no income from other sources would receive 60% of Statistics Canada low-income cut-off (LICO), which varied by family size. Every dollar received from other sources would reduce benefits by fifty cents. All benefits were indexed to the cost of living."--Auric  talk 22:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

text: Some numbers need to be put into the article.  As it reads now, it might have been $20 or $2,000 a month.Kdammers (talk) 06:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of benefit? 

message: Possibly the person who wrote the article was an academic used to jargon, but I find sentences like:  "Indeed, the largest impact appeared to be changes in family composition not the experimental treatments, as preschool children increased the labour supply of husbands and reduced the labour supply of wives by roughly the same modest amount" to be incomprehensible. Did the minimum wage cause a change in family composition? How does the presence of preschool children increase the labour supply of husbands? Perhaps this section could be made more clear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.174.136.62 (talk) 00:35, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear writing 

message: Is too vague, isn't it? 2001:8A0:F6D0:AC00:287E:1E8D:F60A:9C32 (talk) 22:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "in the 70's"
Talk:Nelson River DC Transmission System

message: In 1993 the mercury arc valves of one pole were replaced with thyristors, increasing the maximum power and voltage of the line to its current levels
Which are what, exactly?
Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information 

message: Where are the electrodes situated?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.192.88 (talk) 11:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrodes 

message: First instance: 
The thyristor valves are as well as in Radisson converter station as in Dorsey converter station situated in the same halls, which where originally used for the mercury arc valves.
Second instance: 
The converter halls of Bipole 2 have as well as in Henday converter station and as in Dorsey converter station a height of 24.38 metres (80 ft), a width of 15.24 metres (50 ft) and a length of 22.86 metres (75 ft).
Probably some kind of ESL error, perhaps from French. But I'll leave someone else to decide if the evident grammatical repair is a sufficient repair. — MaxEnt 21:28, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word salad tandem
Talk:Northern Manitoba

message: What is more common? The article title and infobox uses the former while the lead uses the latter. If the latter is more common, we should move this to Northern Manitoba, which would resolve the disambiguator at the end of the current article title. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 07:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Requesting a move now. Northern Alberta, Northern Ontario, and Northern Quebec are all happily living at their current locations, and like them, "Northern Manitoba" is an ambiguous cultural region with multiple definitions. "Northern Region, Manitoba" implies the existence of much more specificity than actually exists - current Manitoba region articles are citing obsolete tourist maps, or nothing at all. Awmcphee (talk) 06:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Region or Northern Manitoba 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Vpab15 (talk) 15:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Northern Region, Manitoba →  – Consistency with Northern Alberta, Northern Ontario, and Northern Quebec. All sources cited in the article use "Northern Manitoba", not "Northern Region". The original source of the "Northern Region" name appears to be a set of unofficial tourism regions that are now obsolete. The region has multiple definitions and should not be treated as a specific object. Awmcphee (talk) 06:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Just uploaded :File:Northern Manitoba boundary map.svg. Apologies, missed your other comment. I've just found a couple GC sources that define "Northern Canada" beyond the 3 territories and will see if they add up to anything substantial soon. Awmcphee (talk) 07:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Map looks great. Thanks for the really quick turnaround. Three suggestions for you to consider and process at your leisure (remember #worklifewikibalance).1) Change the "Northern Affairs boundary" label to "The Northern Affairs Act boundary".2) Change the other boundary label to "Tourism regional boundary (53rd parallel north)".3) Add a third boundary that is the southern boundary of the sum of CDs 21, 22, and 23 and label it as "Economic regional boundary".Re: the template, if the two or three remaining unsourced definitions at Northern Canada#Definitions can be properly sourced (altered if necessary) and then the template becomes in alignment with the newly sourced definitions I can see a future for the south of 60 aspects of the template, subject to some inevitable nuancing out of this process. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 08:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 April 2021
Talk:Peguis First Nation

message: Is this name derived from Chief Peguis ? --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:Port of Churchill

message: Churchill is not Canada's only port facility in the Arctic Ocean.  Nanisivik still has a port, even though the mine has closed.  It is used by the by the Canadian Coast Guard--kelapstick (talk) 05:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the only one on the Arctic

message: The article is required to mention when the port was built. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Pukatawagan

message: Hello, I am a resident of Pukatawagan and have been for 20 years. We sure are isolated, we only have two stores, so there's no such thing as going "shopping" lol. We don't have a bar which is a good thing because if there was there would be more problems. Our reserve is called Dodge City because in the 70's you practically heard a gun shot every weekend, it was crazy back then. I love my home town but the only thing I don't like is the lack of resources. It's so hard just to get the Housing workers to fix a toilet. I know, pathetic! Well the people here are awesome, funny, kind and everyone always says Hello to each other.Peace. SS21
yeah what sup brother ur sister lol  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.188.96.59 (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Separate school

message: Does the Catholic church still do this? Do "rumours" count as good references for Wikipedia now?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 00:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Catholic church instructed its parishioners not to respond to the survey 

message: Wikipedia is a world-wide reference. People from all over the world use it.
I would suggest that one of two things should therefore happen to this article. Either:
(1) Research be done to see if separate schools exist elsewhere similar to the definition here; OR
(2) That in the opening para this be defined as a Canadian term for a Canadian practice.
But it's confusing to have the first para talk about it in general, presumably world-wide terms, then have the second para say "In Canada", then have the rest of the article talk about nowhere else in the world. It's a very parochial approach Randal Oulton (talk) 16:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and prefer approach (2) because the complexity of this system is intrinsically linked to the Canadian experience which historically sanctioned two religious viewpoints over all others.  It was this situation that drove the creation of two separate-but-equal public school systems. Park Flier (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article deals with a specifically Canadian situation 

message: Confusion arises in the use of the terms jurisdiction and board.  Does a board have jurisdiction in a geographic region, or are the two terms synonymous? Park Flier (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology

message: What a joke. Is this the same UN who never said squat when the Hutus and Tutsi wiped each other out. The same UN that didn't say a damn thing when the United States invaded Iraq on little or no evidence and committed a modern day holocaust. Tell you what. The UN can stay the hell out of Ontario and Canada. The UN is a puppet organization and we should have nothing to do with them. We don't take orders from them so they can blow it out their butts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.53.158.217 (talk) 19:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The UN condemnation

message: The section entitled "Separate schools on racial lines" has been split to its own article, Racial separate schools (Canada), on May 14, 2021.  The reason for the split is that this article deals with religious-based separate schools in Canada.  The motivations and implementation of religious separate schools are very different from race-based separate schools, and the two types of schools should be treated differently.  There's also the fact that religious-based separate schools in Canada have a constitutional underpinning, which is not the case for race-based separate schools. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:20, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split material to Racial separate schools (Canada)
Talk:Baháʼí teaching plans

message: This isn't in the citation given. 89.242.129.234 (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second most widespread 

message: How about we move this to Baháʼí teaching plans and make it inclusive of the multi-year plans that started in the 1940s? I don't think this title needs its own article, but could be a sub-section of the new article. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 07:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: yeap. Smkolins (talk) 18:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving title 

message: Pioneering (Baháʼí) and Entry by troops have already merged into this page. There are two other articles that are relevant: Ten Year Crusade and Knights of Baháʼu'lláh.
Here are my thoughts. The Ten Year Crusade article has the potential for notability that the other plans do not, but the page is currently very light and should probably merge into here until it is expanded. Another option is to merge Knights of Baha'u'llah into the Ten Year Crusade article. The other multi-year plans probably shouldn't get their own pages. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 07:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they should both be merged here. The Knights of Baha'u'llah started with the Ten Year Plan but as the article clarifies some started their pioneering as late as 1990. Then as you say the Ten Year Crusade on its own is too short. Can be split off again later with better sources. I'll do the merging soon. Gazelle55 (talk) 01:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

text: Sorry I missed this. I agree on merging here until content is grown. I agree the Ten Year Crusade could and should grow but the scholarship hasn't really been focused on it yet, or perhaps only on certain parts of it and not other parts of it. That's part of why I was asking about the affect inside the US which is mentioned in only one scholarly article perse and all the rest are just effectively primary sources (lists of cities and places that can be compared.) Smkolins (talk) 11:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidation 

message: A hearsay thread for decades, based on a single speech by a House member, states there woul be no more plans after 2021 as the planet would be in (economic?) crisis. Any validity to this in actual messages from The House? CoachingChess (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A letter of 2020-11-25 said that 2022 will begin a new 9-year plan. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 19:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of plans?
Talk:Vita, Manitoba

message: Hello my name is Brianna
Hello my name is Darren
Hello my name is Mackenzie We live near Vita
I changed the date of they tornado to "the early 1950s" to "1954" and someone changed it back?  Why?  Andrew Nielsen (talk) 07:12, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We need a reference source for the exact date of the tornado (newspaper article, local history book, Manitoba history book / government website, Manitoba weather history / Environment Canada history website). Cheers -- Jwkozak91 (talk) 18:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

text: A source would be good, but I was told it was 1954 by a resident.  I don't think that living there at the time of the tornado is original research, but of course I don't blame you for flagging the comment as such.  Andrew Nielsen (talk) 05:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm a native speaker of Ukrainian, and the only Ukrainian word for "life" that I know of is "zhyttia/життя". It's actually Italian. If you look at the corresponding Ukrainian Wikipedia article, it clearly says "Змінено назву і села, і місцевої пошти, на Vita тому що, прокладаючи колію, завідуючий бригадою залізничників італієць застеріг собі право називати зупинки по її довжині на італійський лад." - translation: "The name of the village and the post office was changed to Vita because when the railroad came through, the rail-line laying foreman (who was of Italian background) reserved his right to name stations along the line in Italian." I will edit the article to correct the error.
Andrec at UkrHEC (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Vita" is NOT Ukrainian for "life"
Talk:Mine, Yamaguchi

message: I've removed the famous people section as it appears this was copy/pasted from Yamaguchi prefecture (meaning this included people who were not from Mine). Kido Takayoshi was from Hagi, Yamaguchi, Shinzo Abe from Nagato, Yamaguchi, Atsushi Tamura from Shimonoseki and so on. 私の旅 (talk) 06:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous people from Yamaguchi removed
Talk:Kudamatsu

message: The only verification I can find for the city pop. states a confirmed 2010 pop. of 55,012,
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/324341/Kudamatsu
Should we edit it to reflect the citation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp0987654321 (talk • contribs) 02:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population Verification
Talk:Dr. No (film)/to do

message: *Source alot of statements with references
*Expand "Themes" Section with references
*Merge "Reception" and "Box Office" into "Release and Respnse"
**Then expand
**Including a DVD/Video release
***Which should include information about the video release (mid 90s), dvd special edition (99) and ultimate edition (06)
***Which should incorparate special features. Perplexingly, some of this was done from the outset. Editus Reloaded 09:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Laxmibai Nagar

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Richard P. Mills (educator)

message: This account of Mills's tenure as Commissioner of Education of New York State needs editing not just for grammar, but for substance. Phrases like "unprecedent steps", "Most troubling . . ." and "Mills acknowledged . . .", for example, suggest that this was written by a political opponent. Dactylion (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Check
Talk:Gardenian

message: I can't believe this article was not created before by anyone. Anyways, I created the article using the few sources that exist on this band. Anyone is welcome to add to the article if they know more about the band. --Leon Sword 04:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One of these days, I will get to making album pages for them... -- Shatterzer0 03:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:1995 in Ireland

message: Can someone substantiate the statement that the garda "randomly attacked" the English fans? Smacks of trolling if you ask me. 
Rmkf1982  Talk 22:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1995 soccer riots

message: Regarding the event on May 31st, King Charles III is no longer Prince of Whales by my knowledge: this could lead to confusion regarding the current Prince of Whales.
I am unfamiliar with notification etiquette, hence why I do not propose an edit myself.
Regards, 145.94.231.23 (talk) 14:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Prince of Whales Visit
Talk:Seyed Hossein Mousavian

message: Hey, I noticed that you reverted my edit. It should be added that Seyyed is a part of name in Iran and it is not used as an honorific, i.e. the word seyyed is mentioned in his birth ID, while In Arabic, some times Seyyed (Sayyid) is used to respect a character or in other words is used as an honorific. Mhhossein (talk) 06:35, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete name 

message: As it stands, this is not a balanced article. Two lengthy paragraphs from Reuel Marc Gerecht would be enough to unbalance anything anywhere.
80.17.36.33 (talk) 15:22, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not balanced
Talk:Put Your Hand in the Hand

message: Maybe it's worth mentioning, that this song is one of the songs, where verse and chorus happen to have the same melody (basically).
PeterParker371 (talk) 08:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verse and chorus same melody