lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thornn

message: I deleted the uncited line about the Salem's Seven Thornn being killed since he made numerous appearances with the group after that issue.  Noclevername 22:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salam's Seven 

message: It should somehow be noted that Jeff Loeb, the writer of the Romulus story, somehow believes Thornn and Feral are lupine, when in fact they are feline.
Lots42 02:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to make some edits addressing the above and some other concerns. Lots42 03:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romulus 
Talk:Thundra

message: I've deleted that section as its nothing more than POV. No source was cited that suggested that the character is a Marvel version of Wonder Woman, so nothing in there could be verified as an actual fact.Odin's Beard 01:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marvel's answer to Wonder Woman?

message: What's become of Thundra's weird secret deal with Red Hulk? It should be mentioned. Lots42 (talk) 06:03, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Hulk 

message: We need a pic that has just Thundra. Not the Hulk. Lots42 (talk) 23:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic 
Talk:Topaz (Marvel Comics)

message: Isn't she the bodyguard of the Grandmaster in Thor: Ragnarok?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by הראש (talk • contribs) 00:37, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  MCU appearance
Talk:Phantom's Revenge

message: Clean-up finished. Rpachico 15:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: , you're being summoned to this page to discuss these edits you keep trying to ram into the article. Please don't do that. More than one editor has asked you to discuss this, and if you keep attempting to insert it, you may be blocked for edit warring. Please locate a reliable source per our verifiability policy, and discuss the source here. We should avoid disrupting the article until an agreement can be reached here. Personal experiences do not count and are considered original research. Please keep this in mind. --GoneIn60 (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drop length
Talk:Knock, knock, ginger

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 19:24, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Knock, Knock, Ginger →  – Unless I'm missing something, there's no reason for the title of this article to be capitalized. It's simply a children's game or tradition. You can compare it to the rest of the articles in :Category:Children's games. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 April 2023
Talk:Bandolier

message: is it a coincidence that the three lmgs given as examples are the three featured in call of duty 4, in which there is a perk called bandolier ? Machete97 (talk) 10:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cod4 

message: Should there be a new section, or an entirely new article, for bandoliers of the carrot variety.  I'm referring to the BoC's so prized around the end of a wootoff.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.223.42.130 (talk) 17:15, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  subsection or new article 

message: I'm not very happy with the term 'automatic rifleman', which appears twice in paragraph three. It sounds too much as if there is also a 'manual rifleman' out there somewhere. 
I think the phrase should be changed to something a little less like it has come from a computer game.
What do other editors think?
RASAM (talk) 13:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording 

message: Do the typical X-shaped sashes worn by line infantry in the Napoleonic Wars and earlier fall into the category of a bandolier or bandolier bag? If so, I would suggest adding an image of a line infantry uniform consisting of a bandolier, since line infantry usage of bandoliers would certainly be a major part of the history of bandoliers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.124.50.162 (talk) 18:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napoleonic Bandoliers?
Talk:Bystander intervention

message: in the statement "An Ohio University study compared men who took a bystander intervention session with a group of men who did not have the training; 1.5 percent of the bystander intervention participants said they had committed sexual assault over the last four months, versus 6.7 percent from the untrained group"
is this accurate?, I do not have access to new york times, but I suspect it talks about interventions to sexual assualt rather than assault - at least, that would be my expectation AdityaShankar50 (talk) 09:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double check of statment required
Talk:Matthew Ferguson

message: Just to clarify, the scheduling of the Genie Award ceremony has been variable; the 16th Genie Awards ceremony, when he was nominated for Eclipse, was held in January of 1996 to honour films released in 1995, and the 17th Genie Awards ceremony, when he was nominated for Lilies, was held in November of 1996 to honour films released in 1996. Bearcat 19:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Genie Award]]s
Talk:Erotica/Vintage erotica

message: Should vintage erotica be merged into this article? 69.243.41.28 02:46, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, though they are obviously related. The vintage erotica article looks quite tidy as it is at the moment and this one has some way to go before it is complete. - Solipsist 07:39, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: Erm, there is plenty of difference. But lets keep the discussion in one place at Talk:Erotica#Vintage_erotica. -- Solipsist 05:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived from talk:erotic art
Talk:S5 (Berlin)

message: I don't understand why S5 should redirect to this page!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aldera (talk • contribs) 13:22, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
:It shouldn't.  The page S5 has existed since 2010 and is a disambiguation page. Slambo (Speak) 20:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect target
Talk:Octoraro Railway

message: There seems to be considerable confusion here. The original shortline operator, which took over from Conrail, was Octoraro Railway, Inc., which leased the line from SEPTA (who owned the right-of-way). It went bankrupt and was liquidated in 1994, and the line was then operated by the Delaware Valley Railway, a subsidiary of RailAmerica, Inc. created specifically to operate it. In 1999, the Brandywine Valley Railway, an existing shortline at the Lukens plant in Coatesville, took over the lease. Brandywine Valley ceased operating this line and the former W&N in 2003, and the Morristown & Erie served as interim operator until 2004, when East Penn Railways took over and bought the line outright from SEPTA. Since it sold off its assets in 1994, the Octoraro Ry. has had no part in the corporate affairs of this branch, even though it may still be referred to in local parlance as the "Octoraro Railroad" or simply the "Octoraro". Choess 19:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Addendum: the line was operated as the "Octoraro Railroad" during the year of Morristown and Erie control. The STB filings regarding the East Penn purchase of the line refer to it as the "Octoraro Branch". Choess 19:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I would recommend merging the article into the Philadelphia and Baltimore Central Railroad article... they overlap... any thoughts?... Risk Engineer (talk) 13:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There is certainly some overlap. What about the Wilmington and Northern Railroad, which was ex-Reading yet still part of the this corporate entity? I think Octoraro has a unique heritage that can't really be merged into their predecessors (P&BC, Reading) or successor (East Penn Railroad). Atomsmith (talk) 02:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:LeRoy Neiman

message: The bit about "American Fine Art Editions, Inc" seems almost like an advertisement, minus only a link to their webpage.  Still I'm a bit hesitant to remove it on my own accord.  Anyone have thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.139.71.69 (talk • contribs) 11 July 2006
:I know what you mean. I decided not to remove it only because if we cut it back to Scottsdale, Arizona, it ceases to be informative, in the sense that a person who would like to see the collection to learn more about the artist's work then has to go investigate independently. The one thing I would want to do is verify, which I'll go do in a minute. (It was interesting to learn that the print I picked for my room as a child is of one of his most desirable works!) —Lawikitejana 18:44, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...is what this article needs. There's only one painting shown. Is there some kind of copyright issue with showing some other paintings he's created? There need to be more shown in this article. --76.115.67.114 (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Painting gallery in article

message: It appears there is some inconsistency about Neiman's birthplace. A recent Pioneer Press article on his autobiography suggests St. Paul and Duluth as two possible locations. A recent contributor to the article asserts "changed place of birth from St. Paul, Minnesota to Braham, Isanti County, Minnesota, based on birth records for Minnesota." Citations would be good of secondary sources that have published that as a birth location.--Larrybob (talk) 23:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: Thanks n the 1997 George Clooney / Nicole Kidman movie “The Peacemaker” George Clooney’s character states that he is a fan of Leroy Neimus’ work. 96.241.229.114 (talk) 02:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in popular culture
Talk:Institute for War and Peace Reporting

message: The IWPR is most likely an organisation for politically motivated Disinformation. While I do not have clear evidence to prove this thesis, there are obvious signs that nothing related to this organisation is either scientific, journalistic, or trustworthy in any regard. Apparently, they are being used as a source in small, extremist magazines and web blogs in Germany, where I stumbled upon their Website over a year ago. The purpose is mostly publishing incorrect numbers for victims of violence and war and fake statements. I will be looking out for more examples, but they keep removing old links, while the e.g. wrong numbers from the articles are still being used as sources elsewhere. 
I would suggest either clearly marking all sourcing related to the author within the article, or just simply removing all sources as they are not to be considered trustworthy. Especially when it comes to them claiming that people are part of their organisation that clearly aren't, sources should be checked and segments are removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:494B:D201:197F:7AD4:F892:C43B (talk) 18:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Politically motivated disinformation

message: financing ?? --145.254.203.80 19:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:S9 (Berlin)

message: Line of the Berlin S-Bahn	Line of the Berlin S-Bahn
                         	
Stations                 	Transfers
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
                         	
— Preceding unsigned comment added by MrLincoln (talk • contribs) 15:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  S9 next year.
Talk:Silvercup Studios

message: Curiously Silvercup Studios featured prominently in the TV show Friends, while, actually being filmed in California.
The famous sign is destroyed in the 1986 film "Highlander" in an extended action sequence. It is also glimpsed as a nostalgic moment in 2000's "Highlander: Endgame."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.59.228.204 (talk) 23:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsigned comments

message: This "article" needs source citations; see the talk page template and those in the article for policies and guidelines for editing it.  WP:V, WP:V#Sources, WP:NOR, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, as well as WP:ADVERT. --NYScholar (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing citations throughout

message: both articles suggest their own studio is the larger of the two. which one is it? after this is determined then an article will need to be fixed--2604:2000:A01D:B200:C489:AF2D:8AE7:95B7 (talk) 02:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  steiner vs. silvercup 

message: Weren't many of the scenes in the Mel Gibson/Julia Roberts thriller Conspiracy Theory shot here? TCav (talk) 04:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conspiracy Theory (Film)
Talk:Gabba (band)

message: there is already an article about Dance-punk, which though may not be exactly what this band is refering to it does provide some exmaples of related bands. I however, doubt that Gabba started "discopunk", that distinction would probably fall to Blondie. Xsxex 18:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discopunk 

message: With no actual music to be found anywhere, is there any certainty this band is or was real?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.82.243.172 (talk) 16:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax?
Talk:Revenue Act of 1913

message: The Underwood Tariff was part of the Revenue Act of 1913.  They are similar in scope and neither article is very long.  Therefore, I suggest they be merged together under Revenue Act of 1913, with the Tariff becoming a section of it.  —Markles 19:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger from [[Underwood Tariff]] to [[Revenue Act of 1913]]

message: Dear readers: An editor inserted a statement to the effect that only 36 states had ratified the 16th Amendment by 1913, with an incomplete cite to some sort of Treasury Department fact sheet. I reverted the edit. According to the official publication of the United States Constitution by the United States Government Printing Office at, a total of 42 states had ratified by the middle of March 1913. Yours, Famspear 03:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratification of Sixteenth Amendment

message: Ratification of the 16th amendment and subsequent enactment of the income tax was a key event on the way to national alcohol prohibition. Prior to the income tax, national prohibition had failed because of the alcohol excise revenue that would have been lost. By creating a new source of revenue, alcohol excises could be sacrificed. This connection also explains why so many southern states (and other dry states) ratified the 16th amendment so early.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffryfisher (talk • contribs) 00:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Sixteenth Amendment did, however, authorize the imposition of income taxes on all income from whatever source derived without any requirement of apportionment, regardless of whether or not that tax would be considered a direct tax or not. Famspear (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Temperance

message: If its a family business, put the business name down.  If its a sole proprietor, put the name of the business down. If its a public practice, the name of the practice is put down.  If its a corporation, the name of the Corp is put down, same as a partnership, otherwise I think it would in fact violate the Supreme Court law as being a direct tax on an Individual.  The rent was usually people using farmland and whatever they were growing they would give to the landowner.s The net income is based on all net income within the states.  The only withholding being done AT THE Source was related to stocks that were sold publicly using the same $3000.00 loss that could be claimed today.  Whereas the privately owned shares that are not being traded publicly if I am not mistaken, would be collected at the land agents office by the collection officer , using the same $3000 criteria. I'm still not quite how the children became a part of this because when you are talking about net income, you are talking about a single entity.  This keeps the government out of family affairs.  The tax is "lay" on the land, the levy's against the land, as well as the assessment.12.164.74.34 (talk) 10:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This was a net income tax, not an individual income tax, so why is the word "couple" and "single" being addressed
Category talk:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of WatchtowerJihad

message: has it occured to you that these not only seem like completely unrelated vandals, but actually are unrelated vandals, not a vast AOL conspiracy to make it seem like different people.. please stop stalking random AOL users, thank you ever so much--172.148.156.116 20:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you care to explain, then, why these accounts and IPs have vandalized the same articles and reverted back to versions vandalized by one another?  (As a matter of fact, I have no proof that the registered users in this category edit from AOL; it's merely the IPs participating in the vandalism that are, with only one expection I know of so far, AOL proxies.)  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 02:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: please don't continue to tag sharedips as sockpuppets, thank you--64.12.117.8 03:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've listed them in the category description now.  Happy?  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 04:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

text: This situation was apparently based on a misunderstanding, and has hopefully been resolved.  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gold Circle

message: Another Wikipedia editor wrote that Kohl's moved into some former Gold Circle locations but I can find no source for that besides the comments found on YouTube along with the commercial for the Gold Circle going out of business sale that is already linked to in the article. Kohl's bought MainStreet from Federated Department Stores in 1988 but did they also buy some Gold Circle stores either at that time or later? I did not delete the information from the article but added the  tag.
76.241.87.44 (talk) 19:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kohl's
Talk:Andrew Elliot

message: As Andrew Elliot was born and died in Scotland the final sentence saying that he fled back to England is surely wrong.  Either he fled to England or fled back to Scotland.
:Eh?  Living almost 70 years, didn't he have plenty of time to go boldly forth from Scotland to England and eventually to New York, and then to flee back to England and eventually retire to his native Scotland?  Or am I missing some clever point?  Jim.henderson 00:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jack Rabbit (Kennywood)

message: If anyone has a free photograph of the Jack Rabbit, preferably a picture of one of the trains going down the double dip, please upload and add it to the infopox --Phantom784 12:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo needed 

message: About a year ago, you added the "Miller and Baker Inc. 1923 Catalogue" as a source for the manufacturer being Harry C. Baker. I was just wondering if you could please double check the source to see if it was this Kennywood coaster? Another source claims  the Kennywood ride was manufactured by Charlie Mach. According to RCDB there were two other coasters that opened in 1920 named Jack Rabbit, both manufactured by Harry C. Baker: Jack Rabbit (Seabreeze) and one at Natatorium Park. I'm thinking maybe your source was actually referring to one or both of those. Themeparkgc  Talk  01:07, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry C. Baker
Talk:Murder of John Hron

message: It says a fifteen year old boy was imprisoned, in sweden you have to be 18 to be in prison so this can't be true. You get society service or something if you commit murder.
: Not correct. To get prison below 18 there has to be severe circumstances, but in this case it clearly has. As long as you have turned 15 you can be sentenced according to law, although prison is NORMALLY not used below 18 (and you get less time if you are below 21). Sijambo (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 71.104.16.126 (talk) 05:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No
Talk:Chris Bradshaw

message: There are a lot of broken links on this article.  I can't seem to find them to repair. Perhaps that is because this article doesn't really meet WP:NPOL, or perhaps there are just not that many WP:RS out there.  Anyway, please help repair the citations if you can.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many broken links
Talk:Stephen Harper

message: Which paragraph should "The longest-serving prime minister from a right-of-centre party since John A. Macdonald," be in? Option A has this fact in the first paragraph of the lead whereas option B has this fact in the fourth paragraph of the lead.
*Option A (version until May 15, 2022)
*Option B (current version)
Ak-eater06 (talk) 04:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Any sources for wording in this context.... not a synthesis of sources?  This isn't something academics word in this fashion..thus for sure shouldn't be in the lead. Conservative leader is what is used even in tertiary sources like us.Moxy- 00:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC: Second longest PM from right of centre party 

message: *Option A - reasoning stated in discussion Ak-eater06 (talk)  04:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 

message: I have opened this RfC due to debate on whether this fact should be included in the first paragraph. In my view, it is very notable that Harper was the longest-serving right-of-centre PM since John A. Macdonald due to the Liberals dominating Canadian politics for the entire 20th century (hence I think it should be included in the first paragraph). However, a user made a good point saying it doesn't fit MOS:LEADBIO, which is why I started this consensus to see what everyone thinks. Ak-eater06 (talk)  04:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Any sources for wording in this context.... not a synthesis of sources?  This isn't something academics word in this fashion..thus for sure shouldn't be in the lead. Conservative leader is what is used even in tertiary sources like us.Moxy- 00:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Stephen Harper is a member of the committee of 300. A significant part of his biography that is omitted. A part of such an entry should include what is the committee of 300 and how did Harper end up on it. 66.185.202.161 (talk) 20:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harper as a member of the committee of 300 

message: The article currently lists John Key as preceding Stephen Harper. They must mean Jean Chretien.
Semi-protected, so I'm unable to edit, but this is a no brainer IMO. 198.2.78.141 (talk) 16:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: (Or I suppose it should be Paul Martin, but either way, it certainly isn't Mr. Key.) 198.2.78.141 (talk) 16:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Look more closely at the infobox. He was preceded by John Key as IDU chairman. -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Right you are. Thanks for the correction! 198.2.78.141 (talk) 15:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preceded by John Key