lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Reputation

message: * I have made numerous additions to the {Reputation} article. 
* I am also a co-author for an important paper for which I am requesting a citation be added. '''
This citation should be added just before the text "...which is intended to capture both the economic and sociological forms of reputation". It is as follows:
 
Reasons for this paper's inclusion as a reference:
* It complements/extends a perspective by Mishina, Block, & Mannor (2012), a paper which I added to the references, has been presented at the Reputation Symposium of the Oxford Centre for Corporate Reputation, featured on the Oxford Business Law Blog, and is part of the reputation conversation in the academic literature. The fact that I happen to be an author of this particular paper is incidental. It has been double-blind peer reviewed at the top management theory journal (Academy of Management Review) and also scrutinized by a panel of editors there (for an award process which is irrelevant--it was a runner-up). 
* It is one of a few dozen relevant works in the area, and is clearly not intended as "self promotion"; trust me, there is no "tenure credit" for a Wikipedia citation! 
* If a colleague later cites it in their edits to this Wikipedia page, that's fine as well. I just wanted to follow the normal "request edit" process.
OwenParkerPhD (talk) 17:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connected Contributor and Requested Edits
Talk:Hunter versus farmer hypothesis

message: I don't follow this very well.
It says ADD is an adaptive behaviour as we changed from hunters to farmers. But ADD is an advantage to hunters, not farmers.
It would make more sense to me if instead this is saying that we predominantly changed from hunters to farmers, so the need for hyperfocus disappeared, so those of us with ADD are just exhibiting characteristics of the earlier hunters, whereas everybody else has caught up.
Could somebody who knows please make the article a bit clearer?
: I will work on it. I see your point. As an aside, the hyperfocus is just one of the many ADD attributes which are more hunter friendly than farmer friendly.
:: It might be pointed out that the Neanderthal Theory of Autism, Asperger and ADHD contains a wealth of information along the lines of arguments for these disorders as evolutionary branching. Some of it is right on.
::: So, should I suppose that South American people have a higher incidence of ADD, since their genetic code is closer to hunter's ancestries, the amerindians ?
:How is hyperfocus linked to ADHD? cyclosarin 07:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity 

message: In terms of this theory, there appears to be supporting evidence, based on genetic research and results published in 2002-2005.
The primary researcher, I think, is Robert K. Moyzis at the University of California, Irving School of Medicine.
I've tried to take a look at the results and it's a little beyond me, but articles via the following:
Thom Hartmann's site page on ADD:
http://www.thomhartmann.com/home-add.shtml
ADDitude Magazine:
http://www.additudemag.com/additude.asp?DEPT_NO=102&ARTICLE_NO=29&ARCV=1
Science Daily:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/01/020109074512.htm
And Dr. Myzis UIC site page:
http://www.ucihs.uci.edu/biochem/faculty/moyzis.html
might provide some insight or be useful.
I tried to take a look at the published results at PubMed, but I got lost in the details.
Also, a link from the ADHD page to this article should be made for the sake of completeness, in my opinion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scottjkelly (talk • contribs) 23:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This might be useful...
Wikipedia talk:Rules for Fools

message: Wikipedia:Rules for Fools (see above section) was not the only article to be hit by a lot of vandalism this April Fools' Day, so was the joke AfD nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet of the Apes. In the past, it was the main Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2019/Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2020 articles that were vandalized. This community has shown that it cannot behave properly during April Fools' Day without doing some kind of disruptive behavior or other. Therefore, I would propose to ban vandalism on any Wikipedia namespace article on April Fools' Day, and those who engage in such behavior be treated as they would if they were editing anywhere else on Wikipedia such as in article space, with warnings or bans if necessary. B2TF (talk) 09:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Ban vandalism on Wikipedia namespace articles on April Fools' Day 

message: In general I support keeping the joke XfDs around, but I don't think they should be put in the official XfD pages, like Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. Wikipedia already has precedent with putting jokes into the subpage of the yearly April Fools' Day page: since jokes are banned on article talk pages in 2020, joke requested moves have been done in subpages of the main yearly April Fools' Day page, see Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2021/Requested_moves/Recursion and Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2022/Requested moves/Milton Keynes Dons F.C. for examples from last year and this year. It is about time the same is done for the rest of the joke XfDs. The actual XfD pages should only be used for serious nominations. 96.63.208.28 (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We should probably consider just stopping the individual subpage thing altogether. I don't see why every joke needs its own subpage when we could easily just do it on a single page like RFD. –JJP ‐Talk‐☖ 22:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose since jocular entries have their own templates and sections. NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Move joke XfDs into subpages of the yearly April Fools' Day page 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Wikipedia:AFDAY and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 18#Wikipedia:AFDAY until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wikipedia:AFDAY" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Wikipedia:0104 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 27#Wikipedia:0104 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  NotReallySoroka (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wikipedia:0104" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Teuvo Kohonen

message: It would be great if someone could find the date of birth for Kohonen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spazzm (talk • contribs) 03:19, 3 April 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it on de:Teuvo Kohonen. —Caesura(t) 18:24, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Presumably, Kohonen is a variation on Cohen. Can anyone confirm? (Gee, these guys really get around!)
--Philopedia (talk) 21:05, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL. Definitely not. Kohonen is a common Finnish last name.--Victor Chmara (talk) 15:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background?
Talk:Rights

message: This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eringordon. Peer reviewers: KTJeno.
:@PrimeBOT 102.213.69.68 (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: I can’t help thinking there should be some reference within this page to human rights, which has its own page.
At the moment the two pages are entirely disconnected.
How are rights and human rights related? DouglasBell (talk) 16:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human rights versus rights 

message: Wanted to note/explain templates that parts of this thinly-sourced article aren't very encyclopedic in their prose or examples. Even if some unsourced sections summarize "Main page" articles, other sections could use work. Hoping to get this article rated "B" this month Superb Owl (talk) 00:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads in parts like personal essay
Talk:Cyllene (moon)

message: Robert Fagle's translation of the Iliad, along with Morford & Lenardon's Classical Mythology and Tripp's Meridian Handbook of Classical Mythology, have si-lee'-nee. However, Fagle's Odyssey has sye-lee'-nee.  --kwami 02:46, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Plutonian moon is spelt Kerberos, so it gets a /k/ in pronunciation: normally the name of the mythological hound is Cerberus, starting with /s/ in English, but that would have created a naming conflict. Hence for example Helike the moon has /k/, but traditionally her name is spelt Helice and pronounced with /s/. So Cyllene is spelt with a c and is pronounced with an initial /s/. Double sharp (talk) 07:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 
Talk:Acousmatic sound

message: I removed the following:
:Consider a form of music which is presented through loudspeakers to an audience from an analog or digital tape-recording. This music may contain sounds that have recognisably musical sources, but may equally present recognisable sources that are beyond the bounds of traditional vocal and instrumental technology. We are as likely to hear the sounds of a bird, or of a factory as we are the sounds of a violin. Consider also that the technology involved transcends the mere reproduction of sounds. Techniques of synthesis and sound processing are employed which may present us with sounds that are unfamiliar and that may defy clear source attribution. Consider that this form of music may present us with familiar musical events: chords, melodies and rhythms which are easily reconcilable with other forms of music, but may equally present us with events which cannot be classified within such a traditional taxonomy. (Windsor 1995, p.10n1)
It may be a quote, it may simply be in an inappropriate tone. Hyacinth 11:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Consider...

message: The dating is misleading, here. The word was coined in 1966. With Pythagoras, the meaning in the unabridged Oxford English Dictionary concerns, not the physical configuration of the class environment, but the tendency of his students to listen to the specifics of what he said without understanding the overall meaning.
The idea that he lectured behind a screen is not attached to the meaning (by the OED), and needs a citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.127.166 (talk) 16:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating
Talk:MaliVai Washington

message: For some reason, this page was previously a redirect to Professional Tennis Championships. Somebody correct me if MaliVai Washington and Professional Tennis Championships are actually one and the same, but I judged otherwise and have created a bare-bones stub here. --Iceager 04:55, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Is the pronunciation note right here? I can't see how "Vai" can come out as "VEE-a" - that sounds as if it would be written as "Via". sjorford #£@%&$?! 13:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why it is pronounced that way, but it is correct. Adding IPA some time later. number29(Talk) 11:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Somer–Lucas pseudoprime

message: may be useful : Somer-Lucas Pseudoprime at Wolfram reasearc
:We can't use a straight copy like this. A paraphrase is OK. But there is no explanation of d, and the inequality is backwards, too. This will have to be deleted. Charles Matthews 13:07, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no explanation of d in the original copy from Mathworld, either.  Think it's a copyright trap? Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The primary reference seems to be the author's thesis: The Divisibility and Modular Properties of Kth-Order Linear Recurrences Over The Ring of Integers of an Algebraic Number Field With Respect to Prime Ideals.  I believe the article would be improved if that was cited, but only the meta-info and abstract are available online, so I have not personally read it.
I did add references to two other papers by Somer that go into much more detail than the Mathworld source (which is basically identical to the one sentence currently on Wikipedia) or Ribenbaum (better, but still a quick summary). DAJ NT (talk) 19:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thesis
Talk:Abraham Puls & Sons

message: This article - and its external links - indicate no connection at all between Denmark and the (Dutch) word "pulsen". If such a connection exists, of course, the deleted links could be readded. And both the remaining external links confirm that "pulsen" means "looting" or "stealing" in general, with no suggestion of a restriction to the meaning "pogrom". - Mustafaa 05:13, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: On 2 April 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was transwiki to Wiktionary. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Pulsen for a record of the discussion. – ABCD 22:18, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD

message: The word pulsen was used during the war to refer to looting and stealing , but it hasn't been used in that context afterwards  (see for instance . Interestingly though, a Google search shows up a lot of American sites where it is assumed the word is common in Dutch. It is not. For those who speak Dutch,  (page 198) might be interesting, as it clearly explains how the word was used during the occupation, but not thereafter. Therefore, the only reason why an entry on the moving company of Abraham Puls. Most Dutch language sites, don't even talk of a company, but only of a sole trader called Abraham Puls, who owned a moving truck.  In my opinion, this is not enough for a seperate entry. DocendoDiscimus 11:33, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Beyond-visual-range missile

message: Some data is incorrect. R-33 does not use active radar homing, it's semi-active, on each type of missile (baseline, export R-33E, and upgraded R-33S). Also, there is no semi-active/infrared homed R-27. There were five production types, R-27R, R-27ER, R-27T, R-27ET, and R-27AE. The R types use semi-active terminal guidance, the T types use infrared homing guidance, and A type uses active terminal guidance. For radar models INS is used for first stage, while infrared seeking ones require a lock on before launch.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zb10948 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Missile example mistakes

message: A while ago I deleted the sentence: "Investments in BVR air to air combat have almost entirely failed to achieve their objectives" only for my edit to be undone. I'm no expert on whether BVR is an effective air combat doctrine or not, but Wikipedia articles are not the place to be making such one-sided statements. It's one thing to present one side of an argument, but that's not what this sentence attempts to convey; it should be deleted —Masterblooregard (talk) 03:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Effectiveness of BVR combat

message: History section is discussing only the developments in US and USSR / Russia. This needs to include an information from other parts of the world too. SkywalkerPL (talk) 17:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize, September 2015
Talk:Tikokino

message: The article used to say this:
:Tikokino is the second largest town in the Central Hawke's Bay District on the east coast of the North Island of New Zealand.  
:It is located 20 kilometres northwest of Waipawa and 55 kilometres southwest of Hastings. At the 2001 census Tikokino had a population of 2,715, a 3.0 percent increase from the 1996 census.''
The population figure that the original author was citing is the population of the Tikokino area unit, not the population of the township itself. The area unit covers a large rural area, roughly half the area of the Central Hawkes Bay District, including many other small towns. Statistics New Zealand does not provide a figure for the population of Tikokino township itself from which we can infer that its population is less than 300. All towns of 300 or more are given boundaries and classified as a "rural centre" or "urban area".
There are two urban areas (Waipukurau and Waipawa) and two rural centres (Takapau and Otane) in the Central Hawkes Bay District, so Tikokino is at best the fifth largest town in the district.
Ben Arnold 05:29, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thompson Rivers University

message: This article has MAJOR POV issues. --99.250.177.248 (talk) 20:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But we shouldn't be lisitng the population separately. --Spinboy 02:00, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine. I changed it to "over 26,000". Darkcore 02:06, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds great, thanks for your hard work on this article, I found it a challenge to do all by myself. --Spinboy 02:26, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, glad to help. Darkcore 02:54, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cooper River (South Carolina)

message: I'm hardly the one to fix them, but there are a couple of things I see wrong...
For one, I'm not one to really keep up with local events, but as far as I know, there's only one bridge left traversing the river. At least, I see no signs of the old bridges anymore. Perhaps it's possible that the portions over land are still there, but looking out over the river, I see only the Ravenel bridge. (I should note here that my apartment has a view of the Cooper River)
Second, calling Mount Pleasant a "major city" is a bit of a stretch. I'll let whoever wrote this get away with calling Charleston one, if only because it's "major" by South Carolina standards, but Mount Pleasant isn't even a city, much less a major one. (At least, the signs on 17 and Coleman Blvd. still say "Town of Mount Pleasant"...)
Third, I've heard absolutely no one call the Ravenel bridge the "New Cooper Bridge." I never heard anyone say "Old Cooper Bridge" or even "Cooper Bridge" either. I have, however, heard "Cooper RIVER Bridge" (with both "old" and "new" placed it front of it, with the adjectives confusingly referring to different ones at different times).
Finally, just a note. It's pronounced "Coopa" with the "oo" like in "book," not like in "boom." The Charleston accent can be... interesting.
:I removed mention of Mt. Pleasant.  It isn't a city - it is a town.  I also removed the link to drum island - is it necessary?  It is a dredge mound created when they dug the submarine trench to the Naval Weapons Station.  Nobody lives on it.  As for calling the Ravenel "New", many people refer to it as the "new bridge" because it is the new one.  The two old ones are almost completely gone (there still one section hovering out there). --Kainaw (talk) 21:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors?
Talk:Speed Metal Symphony

message: I'm not sure about this album being released in 1986. Just look at the page, it says it was recored in 1987, but released in 1986! But I'm too scared to change it.--Eel 06:25, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Revert talk page to previous version. Greba 20:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert
Talk:Bernard Chazelle

message: Categorisation: I have been asked why I moved Bernard Chazelle's categories. Away from "French people" and "American people" is clear - that is far too high in the categorisation tree for an individual. He was born and educated in France, which suggests to me he should probably count as a "French computer scientist". However, I suppose "American computer scientist" might makes sense and I'll include that as well - it is hard to tell with people who emigrate from one country to another which category they ought to belong to (I'm not sure that citizenship should be viewed as definitive), but certainly this is a man with a very strong association with France. --VivaEmilyDavies 06:28, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. Deco 19:33, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Some biographical information required, including dates for positions held
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on research should be expanded
*References should be expanded and preferably converted to inline format
*External link present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 00:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Chicago Fire FC

message: Notice: reaching the finals is indeed an honor worthy of notice. Society gives notice to not just 1st place, but also 2nd and third place in major events, as shown in the olympics, 2nd and 3rd place are also given awards and showered with praise. Reaching the finals also shows that you are one of the best, if not THE best, in the league. last time I checked being one of the most skilled and highest praised in a pro sports league is what kids dream of. got it? good, cuz i aint gonna stop.
:I'd rather see US Open Cup and MLS Cup sections for all the teams, like the Kansas City Wizards page has; if a team reaches the final, that'll show in "Final, 2-3 loss to DC United" rather than as an entry in a runners-up section. that said, some (for-profit) media outlets do count losing a cup final as an "honor" and list it with the other silverware. Nateji77 07:20, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I prefer Nateji's method too (although I would do it like on national team pages, just say "semifinals", or "first round", because pointing out losses dwells on the negative).  It is way cluttering where in the honors section. But second-best out of 10 teams? It is NOT an honor. What's next, we're gonna mention the Atlantic Cup? Give me a break. This is NOT the Olympics, like you say on your talk page. In the Olympics, there are 200 countries and/or numerous athletes. There are 10 -- now 12 -- MLS teams. Talk to any MLS player, do they consider getting to the final an honor? NO. Just winning it. They could care less if they finish second or ninth. I would sure like to see a kid which grows up saying "I want to go to the MLS final and lose it! That will be so great!" --Dryazan 14:43, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: Oh, no problems with that (and _I_ wrote most of those), they are important things in club history, but they should just not be in the honors sections. I am thinking of adding a section to each page which will look something like this:
YearDivisionPlayoffsOpen Cup
19963rd, EastQuarterfinalsDid not enter
19975th, EastDid not qualifySemifinals
19983rd, EastQuarterfinalsSemifinals
etc. If you want to help out with that, or anything else, that is great. Sorry if I came off as all negative. --Dryazan 19:06, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reaching the finals 

message: Under assistant coaches, Frank Klopas has two listings. He should have one, separated by commas, and the second should be through 2022, as he is now interim HC 50.234.16.226 (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Actualcpscm (talk) 18:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2023
Talk:Cycling probe technology

message: An article by Beggs et al. entitled "Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Direct
Repeat Sequence for Use in Cycling Probe Reaction" reads: "Another advantage of CPT compared
with target-based amplification technologies, e.g., PCR, is that
target sequences are not amplified, thereby minimizing the risk
of carryover contamination." That seems to contradict the current content of the Wikipedia article. I'm not sure what's right and what's not. —Vespristiano 07:31, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Amplification?