Talk:Atria Watford

message: Does anybody have any more photos or information they can add to the page to help improve it to above 'Start Class'. Thanks very much. George5210 (talk) 18:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving the Page

message: The tag that says "This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed." has been in use for years in the Project.  It is not unclear.  It is totally acceptable.  There is no requirement for multiple tags within the article -- just reference each non-RS-referenced statement.  As was previously explained.  Despite this explanation, and editor has now twice removed it. Continued removal of the maintenance templates, as here, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing and lead to blocks. --Epeefleche (talk) 06:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No other editor said the tag was unclear. That's untrue. Epeefleche (talk) 20:36, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: An editor told you that the tag was not clear.  The point remains.  Unscintillating (talk) 05:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The other editor did not say the tag was not clear.  Only you did.  And why you think this tag -- used in 10,000 other articles -- is unclear, escapes me.  But, still, I communicated to you in multiple edit summaries and talk page posts what was meant -- it refers to all text not supported by RS refs. Despite explanation, you continued deleting. --Epeefleche (talk) 07:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I said that the tag was unclear.  The fact that I referred to myself in the third person does not change the point, which is that you knew that an editor had said that the tag was unclear.  Unscintillating (talk) 13:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

text: *The issue I am raising is the removal of the tags, repeatedly.  If you want to raise a different issue, go ahead.  In a post of your own.  Please stop refactoring my talkpage comment, however. In light of the above, and the background and discussion here, this seems quite tendentious of you. Epeefleche (talk) 07:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *This is a new subsection discussion about something that was sufficiently important to you that you templated my talk page.  I have quoted to you from WP:TPG, but you are holding on to what I believe to be non-neutral language; and claiming ownership of a section title, calling the section header "my talkpage comment".  Unscintillating (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

text: It has been pointed out to me that the 3O request related to the title of the main section, not to the question of the use of Refimprove, and that the latter question is already being discussed elsewhere, therefore is not a candidate for 3O. That is correct. As I am now somewhat involved, I have restored the request at WP:3O and asked that another volunteer respond to it. --Stfg (talk) 18:53, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of maintenance tag, without addressing problem 

message: *You have now also created a dispute about what is a neutral title for this section.  You seem to think as per the template on my talk page marked "Final warning" that you are the owner of this talk page section title.  Unscintillating (talk) 05:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *The issue I am raising is the removal of the tags, repeatedly.  If you want to raise a different issue, go ahead.  In a post of your own.  Please stop refactoring my talkpage comment, however. In light of the above, and the background and discussion here, this seems quite tendentious of you. Epeefleche (talk) 07:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *This is a new subsection discussion about something that was sufficiently important to you that you templated my talk page.  I have quoted to you from WP:TPG, but you are holding on to what I believe to be non-neutral language; and claiming ownership of a section title, calling the section header "my talkpage comment".  Unscintillating (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

text: It has been pointed out to me that the 3O request related to the title of the main section, not to the question of the use of Refimprove, and that the latter question is already being discussed elsewhere, therefore is not a candidate for 3O. That is correct. As I am now somewhat involved, I have restored the request at WP:3O and asked that another volunteer respond to it. --Stfg (talk) 18:53, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute about the section title 

message: An editor has proposed adding a banner Template:ref improve tag, in preference to inline Template:Citation needed (Template:cn) tags.  Unscintillating (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *You were told that your tag was not clear.  You perhaps felt that it was clear, but since an editor had said that it was not clear, that was when you should have stopped acting as if it remained clear.  You continue to ignore the fact that no one is or has been stopping you from adding Template:CN and refimprovesection tags.  With the several references already present in the article, there was never a single case you identified that needed additional references.  Unscintillating (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *See my comments here. Epeefleche (talk) 07:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about adding Template:ref improve in preference to inline cn tags 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Broadmarsh which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 22:45, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Anyone know why it's called this? Blythwood (talk) 19:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Westfield Derby which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 23:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Harlequin Shopping Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130202204502/http://www.capital-shopping-centres.co.uk/files/welcometeaser/114781/CSC_Brand_presentation_17_01_13.pdf to http://www.capital-shopping-centres.co.uk/files/welcometeaser/114781/CSC_Brand_presentation_17_01_13.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified