lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cutaneous leishmaniasis

message: I think the treatment section needs to be revisited, Claims of orphan disease may not hold if someone happens to work in places like Sudan.--Countincr ( T@lk ) 20:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: Iztwoz though I know this isn't Necrotizing fasciitis articles like  refer to Cutaneous leishmaniasis in those terms--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Ozzie10aaaa, the use of flesh eating was in italics in article and not in text - also the other refs do not refer to this and it is misleading (headline grabbing) IMO. --Iztwoz (talk) 10:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: concur--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: references

message: Seems like a symptom like this should have its own article.
Barbara (WVS) (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No article for [[macule]]s
Talk:Prairie garden

message: A history of this page: I accidentally created 'Garden Prairie' when creating an entry for 'Garden Prairie, Illinois'. I moved the article to the correctly named page, which created a redirect from the original. I changed the redirect to a little description instead (better suited for Wiktionary, to be honest.) Somebody then renamed it to Prairie garden. Andyross 20:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hyperrectangle

message: I added the references template. I think this is a useful concept, but never heard of any use of it. Tom Ruen 20:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I found a Mathworld reference to an apparently identical definition:
* 
*: Coxeter, H. S. M. Regular Polytopes, 3rd ed. New York: Dover, pp. 122-123, 1973.
I'll move this article to Orthotope, if there's no objections. Tom Ruen 16:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Orthotope? 

message: I just removed three links from the article that I found to be redundant.  I wanted to explain what I did here, because the edit summary box seemed too small.
* I removed a link to rectangular.  This is a redirect to rectangle, which is linked previously in the section.
* I removed a link to prism because it was near a link to cuboid that I felt was more illustrative of the subject.  Upon reflection, this might have been overkill.  If someone wants to add it back, though, they should link to prism (geometry).
* I removed a link to Cartesian product.  There was an identical link earlier in the section.
--Wayne Miller 15:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant links removed 

message: :
What does that even mean?  Can it be quantified? —Tamfang (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  likely?
Talk:Spinor field

message: I started writing this article based on refs cited, but realized its contents belong to Fermionic field, but I'm not qualified to merge it in properly. --Cubbi 20:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: "whereas particles of half-integer spin (fermions) can be described only by spinor fields." is this strictly true? Rich Farmbrough, 20:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Only
Talk:Sophia of Nassau

message: Why was this page moved without discussion or consensus? Her legal name was Sofia at death, inappropriate to translate. Please move back! Any possible English sources that have her as "Sophia" are incorrect and should not be used to change the name of the article. SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: She was baptized as Sophia and raised as Sophia, as that was her name in German. Most importantly, modern English language sources refer to her as Sophia of Nassau. They rarely call her Sofia of Nassau. Altogether, the number of English language sources that call her Sophia of Nassau is seven times the number of English language sources that call her Sofia of Nassau. Even Sophie of Nassau is used much more often than Sofia of Nassau. Sources that call her Sophia are certainly not incorrect. They are using her native name, so the name is not actually translated. Surtsicna (talk) 11:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus for move? 

message: The, more or less, line of the article purports to a quote stating that "The old time died with Grandma.", said by her grandson. However, there is no such comment on the SWEDISH page, there is no reference to where this supposed quote, and finally, her Majesty had no less than 6 grandsons...which of them said it? Basically, this particular line, while quaint, seem so much nonsense. 94.255.173.237 (talk) 11:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Time Died 

message: Hatnotes are supposed to give a reader actual help in finding or comparing articles about people and things similarly named. They are not meant to clutter the top of articles unnecessarily, far-fetchedly and at whim. I do not believe this is an appropriate action. The 2 women cannot realistically be confused as to which is which. The Swedish queen has never been called "of the Netherlands" simply because she was not of the Netherlands. We would not have a hatnote atop an article about a Prince Philip of Denmark to distinguish him from the Duke of Edinburgh. Opening up the floodwaters of allowing hatnotes due to common dynastic heritage is a very scary slippery slope. I invite discussion here, not continued edit-warring.  --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate hatnote
Talk:PrepMe

message: While reading articles and looking at the company's web site I found that the capitalization used in official materials had an upper-case "M" rather than the lower-case "m" used on this article.  I'm not sure if this is a big deal or how to fix it.  --BerkelyGoogler 20:45, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean you want to know how to rename the article to "PrepMe" from "Prepme"? Acalamari 21:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. For future reference, the move button is between "history" and "watch". Λυδαcιτγ 21:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, okay; thanks. I was going to perform the move myself, but you beat me to it. :) Acalamari 21:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --BerkelyGoogler 14:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction of Capitalization?
Talk:Runnymede Bridge

message: This article has been classified as a stub due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster 20:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification

message: When was the A30 southbound bridge built? It seems likely that it was in the 2000s, with the widening of the M25. Did the 1961 bridge carry both directions of the A30 until then? Can we find a source? Verbcatcher (talk) 03:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A30 southbound bridge 

message: I propose we rename this, from M25 Runnymede Bridge to Runnymede Bridges, for three main reasons:
#The article describes two bridges, not one.
#The bridges carry the M25 and the A30, and not merely the M25.
#The bridges are called The Runnymede Bridge and the New Runnymede Bridge.
Comments please. --Tagishsimon (talk) 04:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose It is a tricky one as no other shared bridge comes to mind. However, that has never stopped me having a ponder!!! I think deference to the motorway network is something of a must, based not on heady preferences of the powerful mixture of motorheads and concrete engineers who contribute to that topic and would call anything a motorway or ancillary to it if they possibly could, but rather on relative traffic volume and the strategic importance of this bit of motorway. I really think to call it the Runnymede Bridges (not seen on maps) would be 1. A little pedantic and 2. failing to recognise the intrinsic junctions affecting this section of road between the two roads.- Adam37 Talk 13:15, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

text: Oppose, we should treat this as a single bridge with multiple parallel spans, see twin bridges. Chesapeake Bay Bridge and Delaware Memorial Bridge also have parallel spans. Bing Maps appears to show three spans: M25 + A30 southbound, M25 northbound and A30 northbound. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to rename article
Talk:Rubber glove

message: Wayne Kerr? C'mon, really? I'd really like to see this invention properly referenced.79.74.187.43 (talk) 23:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventor? 

message: please add a permeability table for various chemicals to various gloves: latex, nitrile, pvc, etc.
: yes please (wiki doesn't have a thumbs up or 'yes please do' system, but well... idk) --181.165.248.160 (talk) 01:32, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  permeability 

message: This article says "Household rubber gloves have been used for washing dishes and cleaning in the home since the 1960s." and yet Marigold's website says "we made the first rubber gloves in 1947"... https://www.marigold.co.uk/about Johnalexwood (talk) 09:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Date
Talk:Lal Masjid, Islamabad

message: What exactly are the "radical and fundamentalist" teachings that are espoused? There's no discussion whatsoever of that
>> The Muslims will say that the teachings are about Islam (The Religion of Peace...hahaha).    What it's really all about is OIL.      —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.67.104.4 (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you do.  Be Bold.  The Jade Knight 23:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  early discussion 

message: I believe the mosque was attacked by law enforcement, with some damage. This should be noted. Badagnani 07:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe someone should write about the architecture of Mosque, school buildings inside the Mosque compound, student capacity, number of floors, location etc also. IMHO, the focus of the article should be the Mosque itself, not the current attack. Simynazareth 11:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mosque attacked 

message: For some bizarre reason, I find this reference to casualties of the raid amusing.
:I think the siege section needs either a total re-write or deleted/moved to the Lal Masjid siege page. Sue Wallace 15:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  many coffins contained multiple decapitated limbs 

message: does any one know the date of the brothel incident if so plz add(akhwandk (talk) 17:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date
Talk:Calyx (magazine)

message: Calyx, Inc. is a long-established publisher of books and a literary journal. While the information currently provided in the entry is the most basic information about the subject, with time the information can be supplemented/enhanced with further details. The facts noted are accurate and sufficient for the curious passer-by interested in the unique operation that is CALYX. B4d4bing 21:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to be rude but Verifiability is generally what matters here, rather than accuracy.--P4k 22:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Should the title of the company and the journal be in all caps? Katr67 (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: All caps
Talk:Singapore Hokkien Huay Kuan

message: I have removed the very large amount of copyright violating text from their official website. Many admins might have deleted the article altogether. 21:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: (Untitled)
Talk:Baron Farnham

message: Seemingly every sentence begins with "He" or "His", making it difficult to follow the history.  In one place, there seems to be no name attached to one of the "He"s:
He was succeeded in the barony by his first cousin, the fifth Baron. He was the eldest son of the Most Reverend the Hon. Henry Maxwell, Lord Bishop of Meath, third son of the first Baron.
Since I don't know enough about proper titles in this context to disambiguate any of the pronouns without appearing rude and/or ignorant, and I don't know what name should be attached to the bold "He" above, I'm going to duck the issue and hope someone can fix it.  --JohnRDaily 21:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronoun madness
Talk:Martin 146

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Acharnes

message: Notifying  and . I couldn't verify that this meets WP:NOTABILITY; it has been tagged for 7 years now, unresolved. I alerted Wikiproject Museums and started a discussion at Talk:Folk Art Museum of Acharnes, where Carolssuarez46 participated. It would make a useful section here. Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: [[Folk Art Museum of Acharnes]] to here 

message: More is needed here about Menidi.  Was it a village?  When did it get its name and how?  Deipnosophista (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menidi
Template talk:BCGNIS

message: Should BC Geographical Names Information System be spelled out in the final result, rather than abbreviated as BCGNIS? Canuckle 18:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that the output of the template is short, I think it would be appropriate to expand this, since it will still only use one line. Done. +mt 20:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Acronym

message: I have been using  (see Template:Coord for coordinates.  Isn't it likely to be the preferred method?  Should it be referred to in the example? --KenWalker | Talk 00:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point (also, I wasn't aware that  was so flexible). I've updated the examples. +mt 20:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coor d or Coord?

message: I changed the URL that the BCGNIS template uses thinking that the old URL was causing incorrect information to be displayed. As it turns out it was a typoed numeric ID in an article that was bringing up the wrong page, but I've left the URL as changed since it appears to be the preferred one. Tweek (talk) 02:51, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Change to URL

message: After editing about 75 articles that use this template, I estimate that the BCGNIS feature name was not the same as the page name and needed correction in about 80% for the cases. This, I believe, should lead us to the conclusion that including the feature name in the template is the best practice and should not be considered as optional. –droll [chat] 18:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optional name? 

message: I think this template is deprecated in favor or .  Can we mark this one for deletion? Cander0000 (talk) 03:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, please don't. At least make  into a redirect to , if that it possible. Now that Skookum1 is gone I won't argue against changes. Make it conform to  if it must (ie, get rid of PAGENAME and so on), if required--I won't resist. If nothing else though, make  auto-expend into  format, if that is possible. I suppose I could rewire my brain to use , but I'm so so used to , having used it many hundreds of times. If it must be, deprecate it (I didn't realize it was), make it redirect or reform itself into , but please don't just delete it outright--at least not for a few years? Thanks. Pfly (talk) 08:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have no objection to making this a redirect.  Autoexpand is a bit more tricky since it may be used within a , in which case substitution doesn't work so well. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:55, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  cite bcgnis
Talk:Zinaida Yusupova

message: The origin of family of Zinaida Yusupova was mentioned as Crimean Tatars. Let me make it clear that Crimean Tatars and Tatars, which refers to Volga Tatars, are distinct ethnic groups with their own places of origin. So, I have corrected from Crimean Tatars to Tatars origin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.37.201.137 (talk) 08:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Princess Zinaida Yusupova Origin 

message: I believe that Princess Yusupova has two pages on Wikipedia (but I could be wrong!) [] There is one Zinaida profile with a picture and info box, one without. If I'm mistaken in any way, then I apologize. Countess Mejerowicz (talk) 00:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, but this is the better article. The other could be deleted as it has no references at all.Taksen (talk) 06:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Princess Zinaida Yusupova 

message: I meant to ask if I, or anyone, can simply translate the Russian version of the article to English? This one is really short. ImperialFabrics (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is too short
Talk:Northwest Progressive Institute

message: This article previously existed as not much more than a stub. It was deleted because an editor determined it did not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability. I have restored the article, combining the previous existing text of the article with new wording and extensive references to secondary sources. This article can now be judged to meet the Wikipedia guidelines for notability because it has been the subject of many secondary sources (see references) which are reliable and independent of the subject. References are cited as appropriate to ensure verifiability per the Wikipedia guidelines. --Ademine 21:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was the one who prodded the article.  This is much better.  Nice work.  Pablo Talk | Contributions 23:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-creation
Talk:Kommanditgesellschaft

message: this article needs a section about the history of accomanditae.
they were numerous in latin countries before the introduction of limited liability companies didn't needed a government grant anymore.
They had been invented in XVth century Florence. Lele giannoni (talk) 14:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnership  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.27.79.164 (talk) 21:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include into Partnership 

message: The article needs to be expanded to accommodate the société en commandite, which occurs in various other continental legislations. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 17:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just German 

message: It's limited parternship, not KG! --213.26.27.234 (talk) 09:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct the title
Talk:Pinnidae

message: The usage and topic of "pinna" is under discussion, see Talk:Auricle (anatomy) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Pinna"

message: Out of curiosity, which species are considered edible? Only the species Atrina rigida is mentioned (in his own article), but the article of the family speaks of several species. Ellicrum (talk) 15:09, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edible species
Talk:John Spencer (rugby union, born 1947)

message: I propose moving this to the existing article John Spencer (rugby player),  which is about the same player but follows a more common article title format and has more links.--Bcp67 (talk) 22:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this was a non-controversial merge (duplicated article), I've gone ahead and done this --Lox (t,c) 23:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: "Spencer is married to his wife Amanda..." S C Cheese (talk) 17:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clumsy wording
Talk:Agiasos

message: This section should be removed.  There are 3 pictures of narrow streets and doesn't comply with Wikipedia's policy (hence the tag).  Someone should see if they could incorporate some of these into all the text before it gets deleted, though.  If they are relevant, then this shouldn't be too tough. Coralshin (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image gallery 
Talk:John Terilli

message: This article had an unusual citation format. I have changed into list-defined references using . Feel free to revert if it doesn't work for you. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 16:55, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to LDR 
Talk:Kiehl's

message: How is "Kiehl's" pronounced?  Like "Kyle's"? or is it like "keels" rhyming with "heels"?
207.237.92.55 (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I removed the little Kiehl's catalogue of products and replaced it w/ a simple description of the range of products offered. 
--Paerra 04:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've removed the peacock language, such as calling its products "premium" or mentioning how "its formulas utilize extensive herbal and pharmaceutical knowledge passed on through generations of manufacture". The article definitely needs independent sources though. -- Atama頭 22:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed the "advertisement"-esque text 

message: An external link, named  A Comprehensive Report | Products & FAQs 2020 - An Absolute Review!, in the references appears to be unassociated to the section. I'm not sure of its use and where it should be placed. It also has a promotional language to it. Feel free to move the link to where it should be placed accordingly. Thanks Chestsuva (talk) 11:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link
Talk:Jonathan Mover

message: A tag has been placed on :File:Jonathan Mover Piano.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here. 
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.   -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:22, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:File:Jonathan Mover Piano.jpg]]

message: And apparently a malware redirect.  10 April 2022.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.172.113 (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Official Website is Currently Down
Talk:Joseph A. Kéchichian

message: The references noted seem to settle the issue. He's also at times a commentator for NPR.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5228775
99.147.219.55 (talk) 14:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?