lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trial and Error (1997 film)

message: James Berardinelli's film review at colossus.net states:
"Trial and Error is designed as a showcase for the talents of Richards [who] is upstaged by the deftly-handled relationship between Charlie and a local barmaid named Billie [played by Charlize Theron] with an adorable combination of sexiness and sweetness. The result is that this subplot becomes more interesting than the main story". Colossus.net
===Sources===
 WAS 4.250 17:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and the review is not a critical reaction, it is a personal feeling combined with a plot review. Staxringold 18:22, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: WAS 4.250 17:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and the review is not a critical reaction, it is a personal feeling combined with a plot review. Staxringold 18:22, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Brooklyn Beckham

message: can we get a revdel? blp here. 
Hydromania (talk) 06:44, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I got the ones you are concerned about. ... discospinster talk 06:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Hydromania (talk) 06:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  RevDel 

message: Is there a source for this? —71.105.198.152 (talk) 22:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: He's on the cover of Variety this week, going by Brooklyn Peltz Beckham: https://variety.com/2022/digital/features/brooklyn-peltz-beckham-cook-instagram-food-1235336663/ Brad (talk) 23:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  He took his bride's surname as his own? 

message: Really? He has no more training or experience in photography than anyone else, and it was never his employment, so why was he ever a “photographer"? Rustygecko (talk) 22:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former photographer?
Talk:Certamen (quiz bowl)

message: Hello, I removed the link for forum as there isn't currently an article for that usage of forum (and, imo, it would only be a dictionary definition if such a page were created). Politepunk 17:26, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed link (forum)

message: I added that the captain of the team can differ answering the question to another player on the team, as it said that only the captain could answer for bonus points, and this isn't entirely true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadrack589 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Certamen is scored 
Talk:Sun Enterprise

message: Cray S-MP? According to http://ftp.cwi.nl/CWIreports/1994/NM-R9415.pdf that was an Intel i860 based machine with multiple 4 CPU busses...
* NEW: 600MP (MBus, 4 CPU) - Cray S-MP (4 x some bus, possibly MBus, 8 CPU) (SPARC)
* SC2000 (2 x XDBus, 20 CPU) - CS6400 (4 x XDBus, 64 CPU) (SuperSPARC - MBus)
* E6000 (GigaPlane, 30 CPU) - E10000 (GigaPlane-XB, 65 CPU) ((UltraSPARC I/II - UPA)
* E6800 (FirePlane, 24 CPU) - SF15000 (FirePlane, 106 CPU) (UltraSPARC-III - FirePlane)
All with netcon, SSPs, remote JTAG, etc. I can't see how the i860 box fits in, unless the remote boot/JTAG technology came from there. The XDBus tech in the CX6400 was licensed from Sun, possible it couldn't have been sold to back anyone else in the terms of the license.
martin@datamodel.co.uk
::I think the document you are referring to is confusing the S-MP with the APP, another model inherited from the FPS Computing acquisition, which used i860 processors. This news article clearly describes the S-MP as a SPARC-based system. Letdorf 10:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

message: The Sun E10K was a really terrible machine for a variety of reasons. I worked with several over the course of years at different jobs. I never found anyone who was happy with their E10K.
It would be nice if this was mentioned somehow, but I can't find any source to cite, just the opinions of people I know that worked with them.
It certainly isn't appropriate to repeat Sun's marketing propaganda about the machine having high-availability features without mentioning that the whole system (every domain) could crash very easily. Sun's definition of high-availability means such things as having a board fail and the domain reboot without the board.
Jqrt (talk) 19:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The E10K sure sucked
Talk:St. Albans (town), Vermont

message: It's worth noting that St. Albans is the terminus for the Amtrak Vermonter train. Also, it would be helpful to know what, if any, bus or car rental companies operate here
:I concur on Amtrak. Specifics on rentals would be appropriate to a travel .com site, probably not here. Student7 (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transportation 

message: im trying to find how i can check the messenger paper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.16.215 (talk) 15:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  just me
Talk:Japan Meteorological Agency

message: Since, at least to my knowledge, there doesn't appear to be a list anywhere on Wikipedia regarding their scale. While there is for the SS, South Indian and Australian. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gavirulax (talk • contribs) 07:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tropical cyclone scales. --Coredesat 05:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it possible to create a page that lists the JMA's Cyclone Category system? 
Talk:Simon Keynes

message: I think his father is Richard Keynes (this makes him genealogically quite interesting).  If anyone can confirm please.  Otherwise I'll email him. — Dunc|☺ 17:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: WP:ACADEMIC: "It is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject." HrafnTalkStalk 17:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nominate it for deletion if you like. Let me know and I will "vote" to delete, but the AfD will fail.  WP serves as a Who's Who for professors, regardless of policy.Jaque Hammer (talk) 09:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not much point -- that guideline tends to get ignored by the inclusionists who frequent AfDs. That crowd thinks that a former-camp-now-secondary-airstrip in Antarctica is notable, and a single sentence on an agreement in a book indexing approx 10,000 such agreements to be "significant coverage". To get this guy past that crowd, I'd have to prove that the men in black had erased all evidence that he ever existed. :/ HrafnTalkStalk(P) 10:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would nominate it myself, but I don't feel like wasting my time. No offense to Professor Keynes, who I'm sure is a good person. Jaque Hammer (talk) 12:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:REDIRECT to Keynes family might be a valid solution, given the complete lack of third party content (and the relative lack of any other). HrafnTalkStalk(P) 12:27, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the missing/out-of-date external links and added :Category:Fellows of the British Academy (which, BTW, satisfies Criterion 3).  Some of his publications could be added to the article.  I'm prepared to bet that he's in Who's Who but don't have ready access to a copy. --GuillaumeTell 17:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He's not in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. He is however in Gales (but only has a short resume-like mention) -- I've added this to the article. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You have to be dead to be in the ODNB!  He's in Debrett, however, which I've converted to a ref, and with all those Fellowships he's got to be in Who's Who, which will have more biographical detail.  I'll look in at the library tomorrow if I have time. --GuillaumeTell 18:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of coverage
Talk:List of Remington Steele episodes

message: Can you please state what needs to be wikify on this page? I see no point in placing red links all over the page. ant_ie 17:51, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This show was a hit... shouldn't episodes like the pilot and finale both have articles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.244.120 (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Articles 

message: Regarding Season 4, Episode "Steele in the Air", I'd suggest correcting the mistake of referring to a helicopter. It's obviously not a helicopter, but a pre-1960 Cessna 182 "Skylane". The reason I don't just want to go ahead and make the change is because the text matches exactly what various other websites mention. Google for "A traffic reporter dies while aloft in a helicopter and the two prime suspects are the disc jockeys, who were on the air at the time." and you get hits from watchseries.eu, tv-links.eu, tv.com, letmewatchthis, tagchimp, ovguide, sidereel, mytvseriesapp, etc. that have that text identically, letter for letter, character for character.
At the same time this brings up a possible copyright issue here. It seems the text was simply copy/pasted when Series 4 was introduced on this page. This may be legit if somehow Universal Studios agreed to it, but it doesn't change the fact that it's plain wrong, no matter the original source. A heli is not a Cessna 182 "Skylane", and a Cessna 182 is not a heli, and Cessna has never built any helis.
He also doesn't "die aloft", he is murdered on the ground and then placed in the pilot's seat of the Cessna, which, when it crashes in Malibu Canyon, disguises the fact that the "pilot" was dead before taking off. That's not exactly "dying aloft".
If this is supposed to mean how the perps meant this to be perceived by the general public if their ruse had succeeded, it would still be wrong, because Doug West ALWAYS flew in that Cessna 182 Skylane, never in a heli, which is also made clear in the episode through dialogs and log book entries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cainoom (talk • contribs) 19:18, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helicopter vs. Cessna 182 

message: *In "Steele Eligible" he references the "The A.B.C. Murders".
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_A.B.C._Murders
*Kenixkil (talk) 15:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Steele Eligible
Talk:University High School (Tucson)

message: Can somebody provide a source for the statistics given on the AP? I know the school is unusually strong, but the best in the world is a big claim to not document. Also, does the average student really take ten AP exams? When I went there a decade ago, certainly some did, but it wasn't the average student.Rigadoun 17:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and I'm reviewing this page, I'm currently giving it a grade of Start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Mid on the this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: While this school has a history of record scores, the article is quite shallow. it also needs more information and needs to cite its resources. Thanks! Adam McCormick 23:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2007

message: Personal opinion as a four-year anime club officer and current (graduating) president: there should be a section listing the school's student clubs, including name, year founded (if known), and current sponsor (if it's still an active club). Holding off on putting one in myself until I can get a second and some more people who know more historical information that can be added. --Jesse Hannah 04:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clubs? 
Talk:Drug possession

message: Parts of this article are completely fictitious.  I'm revamping it. Serotrance 20:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given the fact that law is the subject matter of the article, I would be of the opinion that citations to the actual case law are a clear exception to the policy concerning primary sources. This is because quoting the actual law is a stronger proposition that quoting a secondary source (which may or may not be correct information at the current time, and probably will be incorrect information within about 5 years of the writing of the secondary source) in a field that is extremely date sensitive. This is because cases are clearly "dated", and as such, after a time, will prompt the ordinary reader to conduct a bit more research to get current information. The reasonable alternative would be to require a hat message on all law articles that alerts readers to the "date" issue of sorts. 108.235.248.227 (talk) 20:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary Sources Tag

message: I propose to merge this article into Prohibition of drugs. I think that the content in the Drug possession article can very easily be explained in the context of Drug law, and that article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Prohibition of drugs will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. ––FORMALDUDE(talk) 03:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion is taking place at Talk:Prohibition of drugs#Merger proposal, NOT here. GenQuest "scribble" 18:39, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Depth of focus

message: Is it really necessary to use the non-metric units at all? And if so, why always name them before the metric ones?
*It is no more necessary to use one than the other - but it is relevant to the conversation that both are commonly in usage in photography. There is no intended bias by naming one before the other, nor does it matter, so long as both exist. Furthermore, manual of style dictates that multiple systems should be embraced in order to further accessibility to readers from around the world, and deletion of other units is generally frowned upon. By the way, you can benefit greatly from discussions by joining the Wikipedia community with a username and signing your comments with ~~~~ (four tildes). Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola 20:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I also question the propriety of including a source several months before it's published, and was initially frustrated to see that no publication date was given, and that all queries for the ISBN failed. It finally occurred to me that it has yet to be published, which a further search confirmed. Assuming that  Alipson is one of the authors, the work may be presumptively reliable but at this time is unverifiable. I think a good case could be made for removing (or at least commenting out) such a source until publication. If the ref is retained, I think the link to the publisher's site is essential, because without it, there's no way to find anything about the book or even tell whether the reference is real, and unless there's some good reason for removing it, I'm going to restore it.
I am generally of the opinion that without a page number, a reference is essentially unverifiable, but perhaps one is not yet available. Perhaps Alipson can provide one; I presume he will get a gratis copy as soon as it's published. JeffConrad (talk) 07:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet-to-be-published sources 

message: The section on calculation, as it stands, calculates depth of field, not depth of focus.  I'm still trying to get my head around depth of focus; if somebody could fix this section, it would be good, otherwise I'll try when I understand it well enough. Groogle (talk) 02:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Calculation
Talk:1836 in rail transport

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose. This name represents a well-established and widely used if unwritten convention. See for example :Category:20th century in music. Andrewa (talk) 15:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:1847 in rail transport

message: Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) was established in 1675 as an aid to determine longitude at sea by mariners.
The first time zone in the world was established by British railways on December 1, 1847 - with GMT hand-carried on chronometers.
About August 23, 1852, time signals were first transmitted by telegraph from the Royal Greenwich Observatory.
Even though 98% of Great Britain's public clocks were using GMT by 1855, it was not made Britain's legal time until August 2, 1880.
Some old clocks from this period have two minute hands — one for the local time, one for GMT.
This only applied to the island of Great Britain, and not to the island of Ireland.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_zone
Wdew 20:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: December 1, 1st time zone in the world by British railways?
Talk:1854 in rail transport

message: The London Necropolis railway station was a special railway station constructed by the London Necropolis Company for funeral trains, specifically to serve their Brookwood Cemetery. Opened on 13 November 1854 just outside London's Waterloo station on the London and South Western Railway, three-carriage trains took coffins and mourners from the station - located between York Street (now Leake Street) and Westminster Bridge Road - directly to platforms within the cemetery.
The station was rebuilt at 121 Westminster Bridge Road in 1902 when the mainline station was reconstructed. Prior to 1900 funeral trains usually ran once each day but after this only operated "as required" until by the mid-1930s they only ran twice each week; much of their traffic having moved to the road network.
On the night of 16 April 1941 the station was hit by bombs and never rebuilt or re-opened. However, the entrance to the station still stands in Westminster Bridge Road.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Necropolis_railway_station
The Brookwood Cemetery Railway
An unusual feature of Brookwood Cemetery was that it had its own private railway running through the grounds. The main reason for this was that the Cemetery was over 25 miles from central London, and the only convenient method of transporting coffins and mourners was by the London & South Western Railway. The funeral trains began to operate from 13 November 1854 when the Cemetery opened to the public.
A private Necropolis terminus was provided just outside Waterloo station.
The original station (1854-1902) was located between York Street (now Leake Street) and the Westminster Bridge Road.
This station was replaced by a more extensive building in 1902.
This was due to the complete reconstruction of Waterloo Station.
The original terminus was demolished at about this time.
The new station was located at 121 Westminster Bridge Road and continued to provide railway funeral traffic until the station was bombed on the night of 16-17th April 1941.
The terminus was never rebuilt after the Second World War although the entrance at 121 still survives.
http://www.tbcs.org.uk/railway.htm
Wdew (talk) 12:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening London Necropolis railway station
Talk:Singapore Cable Car

message: Although the operators refer to it as a cable car, and the article previously linked to aerial tramway, the pictures and text description make it very obvious that this is a bi-cable gondola lift.  Gondola lifts are often erroneously referred to as cable cars, and vice versa also.  Anyway, I'm revising the article to correct the usage, so that it conforms with the usage in the articles about the lifts.  --Seattle Skier (talk) 18:28, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, your link was broken so I fixed the syntax - it now links directly to aerial tramway again.  Please correct again if you need to, and be sure to use the "Preview" button to make sure the link works as you intend, before submitting.  Jpp42 09:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singapore Cable Car is a bi-cable [[gondola lift]], not an [[aerial tramway]] 

message: The aerial tramway across the harbour in Barcelona stopping at Torre Jaume I was built in 1931. --AHert (talk) 20:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not first to span a harbour 
Talk:1940 in rail transport

message: User Devoxo has changed past tenses to the present (some present tense was already in the list of events), saying that by that change the tenses are corrected.  Is there a Wikipedia paradigm showing whether using a present tense for past events is encouraged? I have no axe to grind but find the effect to be somewhat dramatic.--SilasW 15:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenses 
Talk:Hokkien mee

message: the links provided in this article are not exactly very apt for an encylo? Chensiyuan 10:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: It has egg noodles (made from wheat flour?) AND rice noodles in the same dish? Badagnani 05:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. This is one of the major things that separates Hokkien mee from plain old fried noodles. Jpatokal (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two types of noodles?

message: Same article, one in hokkien pronunciation, the other in English common name Xaiver0510 (talk) 04:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, so this is why the article was such an unholy mess, since (fried) Hokkien mee and prawn mee are not the same thing at all.  I've tried to straighten things out. Jpatokal (talk) 02:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Hae mee]]
Talk:Alborz

message: It is mentioned that Hara is derived by PIE *ser-, meaning according to the article "watch over". The Wiktionary article, however, states that *ser- means "bind, tie together". Which of the two is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.41.131.253 (talk) 15:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of hara?
Talk:List of municipalities in New Hampshire

message: The description for Populated Place says the location may be incorporated or census designated, but the description for a Populated Place on the GNIS website - where this data originates - says quite the opposite: "A populated place that is not a census designated or incorporated place" ... In my opinion, this column should be removed, as these location names are quite arbitrary and might refer to a road, crossroad, or location unrelated to population. 2601:196:200:5ECC:D530:6324:B740:7ECC (talk) 22:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The description in the article says "unincorporated", not "incorporated", so it does in fact agree with the GNIS description. All the place names appear on federal topo maps. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with "Populated Place" column

message: The wrong populations for Portsmouth and Hampton were on this page from 2012 to 2021. The 2020 census populations are now on this page.
https://www.lowellsun.com/2011/04/21/seacoast-census-snafu-corrected/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.0.38.216 (talk) 16:52, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right that this article had the wrong populations. Shortly after the 2010 census, the Census Bureau issued revised numbers for Portsmouth and Hampton, which were correctly placed in their respective articles but not in this one. The error was the result of counting some armed forces (Navy? or Coast Guard?) in Hampton rather than on their boat docked at Portsmouth; hence the revisions. At any rate, those numbers are now moot. By the way, the best place to go for the correct 2020 numbers is the Census Bureau website itself. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

text: Only for devotees of article histories, since the correct 2020 number was added several months ago. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did you know this?