Talk:Altice USA

message: This page should be for the Cablevision article.  The Canadian Cablevision is a small regional cable system, when the US Cablevision is not only a regional cable operator, but the owner of some internationally distributed cable and satellite networks, and iconic venues including Madison Square Garden and Radio City Music Hall.  It's not like they two frequently confused companies.  What do you think?
71.247.179.161 14:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that someone reverted the changes without commenting on this page.  Please discuss here before another change is made.  Milchama 21:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should be for the US Cablevision article, not a disambiguation page. 

message: When Cablevision (US) was moved back to Cablevision, it didn't include the talk page.  Milchama 18:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move talk page

message: :Image:Cablevision Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cablevision Logo.gif

message: Are there ties between the current manufactures and distributers of Enzyte and the owners of Cablevision? 24.40.165.154 (talk) 22:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ties to Enzyte 

message: updated the article, it probably could use a history section, although most of the company's recent history is there, not much about its founding or development during the 80s and 90s is there.--Rusf10 (talk) 04:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on History of the company 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cablevision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070930224053/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i8b4e2c24bf2df48e5601a0466f77a42f to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i8b4e2c24bf2df48e5601a0466f77a42f
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sunmist3 (talk) 23:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cablevision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121019093354/http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/01/news/companies/cablevision_scrippsa/index.htm to http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/01/news/companies/cablevision_scrippsa/index.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070930204037/http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--beacontheatre1115nov15,0,5052220.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork to http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--beacontheatre1115nov15,0,5052220.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In both cases, error 404 pages were archived instead of actual content. Sunmist3 (talk) 23:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: * http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/30/13799148/altice-usa-optimum-suddenlink-10gbps-fiber-rollout
czar 06:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source on fiber expansion 

message: "Cablevision also carried the Tennis Channel for a brief time from October 2009-September 2011. Cablevision joined the NCTC in August 2009 just to carry the Tennis Channel on the premium sports package which costs extra per month. By joining NCTC the Tennis Channel was forced to give its signal to Cablevision. Once the Tennis Channel's contract expired with NCTC on September 3, 2011 the Tennis Channel pulled its signal from all cable carriers unwilling to negotiate a new deal or carry the channel more widespread. The Tennis Channel was pulled from Verizon but returned on January 17, 2012. Cablevision has yet to make any attempt at bringing the Tennis Channel back as of June 2012."
1: What is the NCTC?
2: Where's the citation for any of this?
Stacecom (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced, unexpanded info 

message: Optimum should have a separate article, considering that it has existed longer than its parent company and there is sufficient information for an Optimum article. There are separate articles for Comcast and Xfinity, so why not with Optimum? My proposed name is Optimum (TV service). 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:5C27:2F31:29B9:AAC1 (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it maybe best to hold off on creating a separate article just for Optimum because Altice just announced on May 24th that all customer facing brands (Optimum & Suddenlink) will be phased out and become "Altice." Since Suddenlink already has an article a discussion maybe needed to either merge Suddenlink into Altice USA or move it to "Altice (cable provider" and incorporate Optimum's history into that article while leaving Altice USA intact for Cablevision's history. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 09:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

text: Optimum shouldn't get a separate article, what should get a separate article is Cablevision. Altice will be merging Optimun and Sudeenlink together next year and this article should be about that. Cablevision, a now defunct company which predates the Optimum branding should have its own article. If two separate article exist for Optimum and Altice, where would it be approiate to discuss Cablevision's history before the Optimum brand was created in the 90s? The answer is neither, that's why Cablevision needs a separate article for the historical company.--Rusf10 (talk) 18:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As of 2020 Cablevision has an article, and the Optimum name is still in use, so yes, it's time for Optimum to have an article. The above-suggested name's "(TV Service)" qualifier doesn't match the present reality, namely that Optimum's direct-mail offerings include Internet service. "(TV/Internet)" without the word service is short yet more complete. An old article (a redirect as of 2008) named "Optimum TV" contained primarily a list of channels. A link to this, in the spirit of WP:Preserve, is planned for Optimum (TV/Internet)). Pi314m (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Article for Optimum