Talk:List of Naruto episodes/Archive 1

message: In the May 2006 issue of Shonen Jump, there is a list of some of the up coming episodes.
:Somebody needs to add episodes 146, 147, 148, 149, and 150. I would but my computer can't type Kanji, let alone display it.
::Done ^^--JadziaLover 21:51, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shonen Jump

message: Umm, were is episode 138? Can somebody please add it to the list?
:Done ^^--JadziaLover 19:36, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 138 

message: Is it necessary to have the US titles on this page? There's already a seperate page for them, after all--JadziaLover 19:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not the one who put them there, but I think the question should be rephrased as, is it necessary to have the US titles on a separate page? They're already here, after all. Using the same page makes a lot more sense. --AceMyth 19:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with AceMyth. Also, it would be one less page to keep up-to-date. --Pentasyllabic 22:38, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, then I propose to merge them. --JadziaLover 23:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  US titles 

message: TV Tokyo only lists up to episode 182. Where did the titles for 183+ come from? Geg 16:47, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They mostly come from here. ～卍 JadziaLover 会話~投稿 卐～ 09:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit curious 

message: I found these over at ANN. Its the titles for Episodes 196 and 197
2006-08-02 196. "The unwanted child strikes, The day time stopped" 鬼後の攻撃 時間が止まったあの日 Onigo no kōgeki, Jikan ga tomatta ano hi.
2006-08-09 197. "It's Kakashi-sensei's birthday!" カカシ先生の誕生日だってばよ！Kakashi-sensei no tanjōbi dattebayo!
Im not sure on how to add them to the list, so anyone who knows how can I do it?
Be careful though, because there is a lot of controversy going on about these episodes, meaning that it's unknown if these episode names are real or not, so if you want to add those you can but be careful though. 24.188.203.181 23:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 new episode titles 

message: Seeing that no one is bothering to write all the summaries and that having short sumamries below episodes makes it extremely difficult to browse through the list, I suggest that we remove all the existing summaries and link every one of the episode titles, even though there are a lot of red links. Articles are not going to be added if we don't start telling people that they are needed. And labeling each and every one of the arcs isn't bad. Having it in another article is good, but labeling it here distinguishes arcs from arcs, since it is nearlt impossible to tell episodes in different arcs apart by looking at their titles. And I don't understand why someone would not want the list to be organized. There is never too much information. --Doomed Rasher 00:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Summaries can be shoved off of existing episode articles for a start. I haven't been folowing the anime closely since the filler arc(s) started so I disqualify to write the summaries. --Cat out 09:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summaries: Good or Bad? 

message: I have been thinking about this, and I want the arcs to be relabeled. Labeling the arcs makes it easier to distinguish between episodes, and it makes browsing much easier and organizes the list further as it is now. I don't want to hear any comments saying: "OMG! We all no taht theres a separate article w/ teh arc names, we dunt need joo labeling them 'gain!111one11shift1". The other article's quality is low and does not include the episodes of the arc. Having a bit of extra information doesn't hurt. --Doomed Rasher 21:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unnecessary. We have a list of arc. It only further convolutes the episode list to add it here. Also, in repsonse to your assertion that the episodes aren't listed: "Exposition: Episodes 1-5, Chapters 1-8". You need to look next time. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 23:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hmm, must have been a recent event, because the last time all they had was the names of the arcs and not even a summary. Or was that just a vandalism edit? :P Oh well. --Doomed Rasher 01:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well maybe, if we labeled the arcs, we wouldn't need that page. Less pages to edit. I thought that was a preference. The Wretched 08:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration of the labeling of the arcs 

message: I've created stubs for all nonexistent episode articles.  I also plan to check the existing episode articles and make sure they have the correct category and infobox information.
Please feel free to add plot summary or other information to these articles (and since we don't want to run afoul of copyvio please make sure you wrote it yourself or have permission to take it from somewhere else if you do...).  I marked them as stubs, but feel free to remove that category once the articles have more information.
-- Meersan 22:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it just me or is individual episode articles an incredibly bad idea? They're prone to vandalism since nobody is going to monitor them (I for one can't be bothered clicking "Watch" on 200+ pages), and it's perfectly ok to have a one to two-sentence summary on the main list (or even none at all, as it was originally.) --Pentasyllabic 03:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You may be right. However, there were already 40-50 episodes that had individual articles.  Now they have valid and consistent information, and if a new user wants to contribute something they don't have to wrestle with infoboxes, templates, and prev/next links.  Now that the other episodes have stubs it's more likely other users will contribute to them.  It's not trivial for a new user to figure out how to add the right infoboxes and templates, but it is trivial to add an episode summary or other information. Other shows like Pokemon and South Park have articles for individual episodes, so it doesn't seem unusual for Naruto to have them, particularly when so many already existed.  I don't intend to watchlist every single article, though I guess I could, but I do plan to go through and write summaries and manga comparisons for the new articles.  I expect it may take some time to complete the entire project.  That's why I invited others to help out on this page.  Cheers, Meersan 04:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto Episode Stubs 

message: I have been doing all of the recent episode summaries for Naruto, and although they might not be the best, they are something. I would just like everyone here to know that if anyone can write some summaries for Season 3+ it would greatly benefit the community. I will probably resume episode summaries in the comin weeks. However, detailed episode accounts for the pages that link to the episodes are even more needed (b/c currently they link to a useless page with no info whatsoever). I do not plan to write detailed accounts b/c I would need to rewatch all the episodes and I do not believe that I am up for the challenge. Just putting forth my 2 cents and all. Oh, and feel free to correct or modify my summaries a bit to better articulate them or to correct any grammatical or canonical mistakes. The great kawa 07:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Help for Episode Summaries 

message: Many Naruto episodes can be found at Youtube. Should we put links to the episode video at the articles about it? The Gerg 17:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't, that's a copyright violation, even if it's not hosted by Wikipedia (see WP:EL). Sometimes a small amount of video used to demonstrate something about a show can be used under fair use, but definitely not a whole episode, let alone several. -- Ned Scott 18:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the deal with video snippets?  Are there any being used currently to illustrate anything to do with tv episodes? - Peregrinefisher 22:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there are very few, if any in which the entire episode is show in one clip. This is due to YouTube's policy of video length (Unless you have special account, they can be no longer than 10 minutes). They are generally about 9 minutes long. Would this work? The Gerg 21:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it wouldn't. Half an episode is just as bad, and goes completely beyond simple illustration. Images are allowed because they are used to illustrate a point or a character. Offhand, I can think of very few instances where actual video is considered acceptable. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We could use/host a very short (like 20-30 seconds) clip if it illustrated something that words can't. However... I can't think of anything that would satisfy that condition. And of course, it would have to be in Ogg Theora format, which not very many people can view without installing some software. ~MDD4696 15:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links of videos for episodes? 

message: 203 The Decisive Battle of Love and Hate Between Teacher and Student, Jounin and Genin Cut Loose and Go Wild! 愛と憎しみの師弟対決、上忍も下忍も入り乱れて ai to nikushimi no shitei taiketsu, ue shinobu mo shimo nin mo irimidare te 5 October 2006
List of Anime Episodes TV
EpisodeNumber = 203
EnglishTitle = The Decisive Battle of Love and Hate Between Teacher and Student, Jounin and Genin Cut Loose and Go Wild!
KanjiTitle = 愛と憎しみの師弟対決、上忍も下忍も入り乱れて
JapaneseTitle = ai to nikushimi no shitei taiketsu, ue shinobu mo shimo nin mo irimidare te
OriginalAirDate = 5 October 2006 
Current revision (16:26, 14 September 2006) (edit)
Geg (Talk | contribs) 
(that's not the actual title of the episode, that's the title of the special)
what is it if not an episode? dont delete it entirely. if it isnt part of season 8, then make a place for it properly. otherwise it is wasted in getting the kanji and romanji for it. better to have some partial data that is confirmed than no data at all just cause you dont know exactly what to classify it as Episode or Special is is airing on TV and we dont know if it fits the filler arc plot or not until it does air.
71.71.79.235 16:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh, there's no reason we have to be the first people to have it listed. We can wait until we have conclusive proof that this is the episode title. ~MDD4696 17:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  well at least the info is here for when the time comes it can just be copy and pasted to the correct area for the episode list. 71.71.79.235 17:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  http://cal.syoboi.jp/tid/210/subtitle has been updated to episode 206. ~MDD4696 16:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  so everything is saying that this IS episode 203-205 including the japanese wikipedia site. http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naruto so how do you classify 3 episodes that fall under a single title for wikipedia? that is if they dont have titles for each 24 minute segment/part of the special. 71.71.79.235 17:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is pure speculation but going by every twenty five episodes counting as a seaon, that they are trying to knock three episodes in one shot to close out the filler. It looks like a three episode special to celebrate the new timeslot on Thursdays, from the commercial at the end of ep 200. But seriously if it isn't specifically stated to be an OVA or whatever and it wasn't released in theatres then it's an episode.Rayfire 18:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  All the episodes in specials have individual titles. This one is not going to be an exception. The Splendiferous Gegiford 05:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  naruto special Oct 5 

message: Ok, I know the goal of everyone else is to make this as English an western as possible, but I thought we were supposed to be using English translations not dubs. Translations are still in English and understandable. The English dub titles aren't the original, real titles and thus should probably be changed to the translations. Same thing with Ninja techniques. For example, Zaku Abumi's "Slicing Sound Wave" is really called Zankuha or "Decapitating Air Wave". It was probably changed in the dub due to the negative image one would get from the mention of decapitation. Also, the dub has the wrong kind of wave. It's an air wave, not a sonic one. So yeah, translations over dubs, please. 71.212.160.161 05:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Translations aren't concrete, whereas dub names are. The English names and Japanese names are more or less the same anyway. The Splendiferous Gegiford 05:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Not Concrete"? How do you figure? 71.212.160.161 05:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They can be translated several different ways. The dubs are the official titles in English. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 05:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why don't we include both? The Wretched 06:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, they can be translated several differnt ways. We have offical translations from Viz. Why include anything else? They mean the same thing. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 06:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

text: You'll get reverted if you do crap like that. I can see the kanji just fine. The problem's on your end. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 05:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Names 

message: I just came across  one of the individual Naruto episode articles, and browsed a few more. It looks to me as if they contain nothing but a plot summary, and are thus violating WP:NOT (indiscriminate collection of info, point 7). Are there plans and possibilities to turn all of these articles into "real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot"? If not, then these articles may well come up for deletion. I thought it better to mention it here first, since a lot of work has probably gone into them... Fram 14:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's very possible, and strictly speaking it should apply to things like Category:Pokémon episodes as well.  Of course, as editors we can only fix the things we come across.  It should be up to the community to determine whether there is a consensus.  Since most of articles are stubs it may be possible that critical analysis will be filled in later as the articles evolve.  I keep most of them on my watchlist and 5-10 receive updates on any given day, which would indicate there is a fair amount of activity and expansion going on.  I thought I should respond since I created many of them as stubs, but I don't have a strong opinion either way.   -- Meersan 21:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'll keep an eye on them as well but for the moment I'll leave it as it is. I didn't mean to single those out, all articles on episodes, books in series, ... should follow these policies of course. Fram 04:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Individual episode articles

message: Since the AfD part for the episode summaries resulted in a keep vote, should the individual episode articles have the AfD notice removed? shadzar|Talk|contribs 04:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep 

message: Shouldn't this toonami recap special at least be mentioned
:It's not really an episode, so it's difficult to fit in. OVA section maybe? It's just a clip show so I'm not sure. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 05:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special Toonami Only Aired Episode, (The Adventures of Naruto! ... Oh, and Everyone Else's, Too' 

message: Why has episode 202 been delayed until October 5 when it is originally meant to air September 27? Is it to give the manga EVEN MORE time to ahead or what's the story? - The preceding comment was made by Grevenko Sereth 19:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean episode 203? It may have to do with the new season starting and the switch to Thursday evenings. ~MDD4696 20:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 202 

message: This list is not corresponding correctly with this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Naruto:_Shippuden_episodes_%28season_4%29  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.19.169 (talk) 21:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List appears to be incorrect 

message: I know nothing of anime or naruto. I just noticed that the national tv station (in Denmark) is showing naruto on the "children" channel and has a "naruto uncut" late night on one of the other channels.
I went to wikipedia to see what the difference was (including, but not limited to, the obvious being "more violent" i assume). Also the uncut editions are subbed, where the children versions are dubbed.
I hope/wish someone will write a section about the differences.
87.53.32.90 (talk) 23:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  uncut 

message: A large amount of people coming to this page want to know what episodes are filler. Filler is a self defined term with in the anime watching community, and episodes that fit that definition should be labeled as such. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filler_(media)#Anime_series  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.74.66.92 (talk) 04:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been discussed ad nauseum, and consensus is that filler doesn't get marked, for a variety of reasons. If you want to know what's filler and what isn't, do a Google search; there are plenty of fansites with that type of information. 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 20:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  at least there could be a section about it or maybe just a reference with a link to a particular good fansite having this info. 87.53.32.90 (talk) 23:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  filler list 

message: Wikipedia is currently using an incorrect season list.  Instead of the official seasons, it is using arcs.  For more information on this topic, go to http://naruto.viz.com/news/index.php?id=99.  To correct this error, I suggest two alternatives.  1) Replace the word season with arc wherever it appears on the page.  2) Redesign the page to fit the official, correct seasons.  "'season 1' of the original Naruto covers episode 1-57, season 2 covers episodes 58-106, season 3 covers episodes 107-163, and season 4 covers episodes 164-220." []   Rdh288 (talk) 17:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Except Viz published the series as 16 box sets, and didn't call them arcs or seasons at release. So calling them official seasons is also off the mark, the fact they put seasons in quotes, suggests that they don't promote them as such. Dandy Sephy (talk) 17:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What about the box set there relasing now ? ie Season 1 volume 1 and voume 2? although ti does not seem to follow the above and it only boxing 3 boxset together--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 18:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at their shop page before posting that and it only had the old release, plus the first two shippuden. I did see the pack shot int he link above but it didn't register with my brain at the time. Essentially you've now got two completely different releases from Viz, and we should be careful about changing the entire list set just because they are repackaging the series.    Dandy Sephy (talk) 18:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed there need ot be a lengthy dicussion about it, but personally it looks like viz are trying to group them into bunch of nearly 52 epsiode ie what they licensed and then dubbed at least that what i got from reading about but ther new boxsets would appear to suggest something else. Personal i say when the opening credits change that is techically japan way of saying a new season unless there is arcs--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 20:22, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Seasons! 

message: Hello I here have a reference on confirmed information since in forums, I encourage news network and youtobe are proofs that this episode has been transmitted for cartoon network leaving the last ones 10 without transmitting.
Ref. encourages news network.
Http: // www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php? Id=1825*page=25
This it is my opinion regards and I hope that he serves them not to undo my edition.--Ichigo9315 (talk) 20:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: YouTube is proof only that the episodes have been dubbed into English by the same group that did the first 209 episodes (and either way, the YT videos are illegal copyright infringement, and so cannot be linked regardless). The ANN encyclopedia is user-submitted and so not a reliable source. In addition, ANN's source for episode 210's airing was the November 2008 issue of Shonen Jump - however, every time SJ includes episode guides on upcoming broadcasts, it includes the disclaimer that "air dates and episode titles are not finalized" (or something to that effect); just because SJ shows an episode doesn't mean it will air when they say it will, if at all. I watched Naruto as it aired on Cartoon Network (my DVR was set to automatically record every episode), and I know for a fact that episode 210 never aired. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 17:04, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 210 dates of transmicion for cartoon network 

message: Why did the English episode titles: 2, 3, 7, 9, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 31, 36, 39, 50 and 51 are different here and here. And this is only the first two seasons. Someone might be to harmonize these two seasons, and the other seven?
77.252.139.186 (talk) 21:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles 

message: does anyone know why this OVA is not listed?  Or know any of the specs about it at all?
BTW to all naruto fans who love everything to watch of Naruto check it out, its a cute story!
----  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joby1898979 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: i believe it is a ecent ly made ova but i dnt think ther eany soruces no dattebayo is not a source--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 21:59, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  naruto: naruto, the genie and the three wishes dattebayo!!