Talk:Marie Osmond

message: Ms. Osmond deserves a better main article photo. How do we go about that? Please be nice; I'm new. Clarawolfe (talk) 01:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agree.  - FlightTime (open channel) 21:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Images of living people on Wikipedia need to be freely licensed. If you are the copyright holder of a better image, I'm happy to help you release the image under such a license so it can be used on this page. I found a different image of Marie Osmond on Flickr that was freely licensed and used it on this page instead (but I'm not sure if it's better than the previous one). Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Photo Update Would Be Nice 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marie Osmond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160704074418/https://www.instagram.com/therealmarieosmond/ to https://www.instagram.com/therealmarieosmond
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Well, she said it so traumatized her that she felt she might be a lesbian at age nine. (rolls eyes) Whatever - she is on the record, although I haven't dug into the RS's about who she alleges abused her, but it should be in the article in some form under the Personal Life section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.3.59 (talk) 05:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent statements about sexual abuse as a child 

message: @Modsquad3 indicated on Commons:Village pump/Copyright that they work for a celebrity  and their only Wikipedia edits are on this page. I am starting this discussion with hopes that they will come into compliance with WP:COI policies. -- William Graham talk 02:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi William Graham, I emailed Modsquad3 and she clarified that she is not being paid to edit the page. In this case "working for" does not indicate a fiscal relationship. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unpaid or not, working with or at the direction of the subject of the article is a COI issue. Payment is not my main concern. --William Graham talk 19:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not paid by Marie Osmond, her business, or anyone else to edit her page or any other page. I also am not working with or under the direction of Marie Osmond. I have not spoken with Marie Osmond about her Wikipedia page and have not received information or direction from her. I am working on factually updating her page & simply needed info on how to update a photo. I have a degree in print journalism & am interested in adding only updated, factual material that can be cited with proper references. I work 80+ hours a week at my fulltime job and work on editing this page as time allows. When finished with this page, I hope to work on other pages as time allows. When I stated I work for a celebrity, I simply meant that I am working on that person's page. Modsquad3 (talk) 17:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest edits