lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neolithic Revolution

message: How did agriculture revolution change early humans 2600:8801:DF0D:AE00:2CE2:20D1:54:4BA8 (talk) 03:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did agriculture revolution change early humans 

message: Does no one find it odd that the word slavery does not even appear in this article even though it was a prerequisite 2600:1008:B18E:9554:4A1:6AE5:795B:AA2A (talk) 23:41, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A prerequisite for being part of the neolithic revolution? As we have no written records and archaeology can't show slavery, no. Doug Weller talk 10:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - are they thinking of the Bronze Age, I wonder? Johnbod (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

text: archeology can definitely show sings of slavery? Bookyteeth (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavery 

message: The part of the introduction about the neolithic package and how farming gave rise to hierarchy just isnt true? Hierarchy can exist both with and without hierarchy. The opening also implies that farming, once adopted, was a permanent feature, something that's not always reflected. Amending some of the phrasing here and later on would more accurately reflect the ways that agriculture changed societies, and help resist the idea that history only moves one way. Bookyteeth (talk) 15:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: An amendment made on 28 August 2017 by User:Chiswick Chap removed the statement "Personal land and private property ownership led to a hierarchical society, with an elite social class, comprising a nobility, polity, and military" from the lead section, without an edit summary but presumably because the statement was inadequately supported by citations. The words "hierarchical ideologies" remained, without citation, presumably overlooked then and ever since. I agree that this requires a citation and have flagged it as such. Don't know what User:Bookyteeth means by "Hierarchy can exist both with and without hierarchy". Masato.harada (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that, meant "hierarchy can exist both with and without farming"  Bookyteeth (talk) 00:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linear progression of society  

message: Why is BP (a relatively unknown standard) used? 197.234.165.147 (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it concerns prehistory. Before Present is standard in such cases. Dimadick (talk) 00:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be truer to say it it is often preferred in such cases, further back than some cut-off point. I wouldn't expect to see it used for the European Bronze Age for example. This topic is about at the borderline imo. Johnbod (talk) 03:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  BP 

message: History of agriculture 2000 BCE and 3000 BCE advantage and disadvantage 2409:4072:E8B:2581:9963:F6AF:1FC5:3614 (talk) 12:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:The Well of Lost Plots

message: "For the reader's convenience, every book you have ever read is a version 8.3."
Is it right to say this? The existence of the Book Operating System is only established within the Nextiverse. OTOH, the books themselves do purport to be published by the same means as the books within the fiction (e.g. the Goliath corporation logos, and adverts for character exchange programmes).
Agh, bally metafiction! :-) --DudeGalea 20:09, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Book OS Version for us?
Talk:The Order of the Stick

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vampire_traits_in_folklore_and_fiction
Please add it with a "buddy" (that is, add it under the same entry on every table), to make the sorting job easier...  (I'm currently trying to work on getting these tables sorted into some kind of vaguely rational order, or at least into the *same* order...)
If the assorted tables intimidate you, then please put the *info* for OotS vamps on the talk page, and I or someone else will actually add it into the tables.Tamtrible (talk) 05:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone add OotS to this page? 

message: So there's no mention of the Oracle of Sunken Valley, Belkar's curse and subsequent character development, or Roy's relationship with Celia in the Plot section. I don't have time to write them in just right now, but I'm hereby signalling that I intend to. —VeryRarelyStable 10:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major missing plot thread(s) 

message: The article states that Redcloak is Lawful Evil, citing to this strip.  In that strip, however, Redcloak is addressing O-Chul, and noting that O-Chul is Lawful.  That doesn't mean Redcloak is.  His methodical attempt to get information shows his bent toward the scientific, as noted later in our paragraph, but that's not enough to paint him as Lawful.
The latest strip, however, shows him summoning an entity that addresses him as "Cleric of Law".  Redcloak also refers to this spell as getting help "from the other side of the family", meaning not a devil.  This is consistent with the conclusion that he is Lawful Evil and is now relying on the Lawful alignment rather than the Evil one.  This may be OR.  Still, I think the new strip would be a better supporting reference. JamesMLane t c 20:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks as though the List of The Order of the Stick characters article is going to be deleted, in which case we're going to have to port some of the information from there, over here. So the Characters section is probably going to get a rewrite in any case. —VeryRarelyStable 23:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redcloak's alignment 

message: This entire section was removed from the article, in case anyone can find sources or a use for them in the future. 2601:240:E200:3B60:E0FD:4466:64:7446 (talk) 11:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fictional world" section removed from article
Talk:Orders, decorations, and medals of Belarus

message: I will draw the ribbons after I am done with the Hero of Belarus and drawing ribbons of the former Soviet Union. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 21:13, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the ribbons for Belarus will be easy to draw, since there is few of them, I will try to do all of them before the movers show up on Monday. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 19:56, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ribbons 

message: A good reference, just loctaed on eBay: 
Title: The Awards of Belarus 
Size: 207 x 131 mm 
Pages: 96 
Languages: Russian and Belarusian
If anyone can find it or has it, just let me know. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 23:10, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book 

message: I prepare to rename the article to "Awards of Belarus". It is simplier. SZv (talk) 19:03, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming

message: *There should be a category link to Natalism as a natalist award is on the page.
*Kenixkil (talk) 21:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Natalisism

message: Interesting, that there are no Russian names given, considering Russian is also an official language of Belarus, and also the most spoken of the two. Was there any reason behind this? Because if there was not, there is a Sunday incoming, during which I hope to have some free time for punching buttons =D
45.94.119.255 (talk) 20:26, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian translation and romanization incoming?
Talk:German occupation of Norway

message: The notion that the Germans during WW2 wanted to rule the world is a falsehood. Hitler never permanently claimed an inch of territory unless it had formerly been part of Germany before Versailles. In support of this assertion, Hitler always allowed the countries occupied by the German military to keep their own governments, as required by international law. When the allies seized Germany they illegally arrested the German Government, which had not surrendered.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.144.96.76 (talk) 04:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of your statements are entirely or partially true. For example, I have read a claim (although I cannot find a reliable source) that the Allies did cause themselves quite a juridical headache by arresting the Flensburg Government without demanding it to formally surrender first. However, it is a major falsehood that Hitler’s Germany did not permanently claim other than pre-Versailles territories. Even if we maintain that the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia and the General Government were not intended to be permanently annexed (quite a stretch), Austria and the Sudetenland were annexed before the war and Luxembourg in 1942. As far as I understand, the annexation of most CdZ areas was less formal in nature, but still showed major signs of permanent territory claims. – Jippe (talk) 15:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germans wanted legitimate government to remain in place 
Talk:Yvon Neptune

message: This article is extremely biased and appears to be a list of reasons why Yvon Neptune is innocent of charges.  It may as well have been written by Neptune himself or one of his supporters or attorneys.  This is not an encyclopedic entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.161.24 (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sarandë

message: Why is there a greek writing to the name of the city, on this page. Is it the same contest with janina as well. 86.18.204.26 (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saranda  

message: The existence of a proto-Greek area in LBA is confirmed by contemporary scholarship and is based on extensive scientific data. As such Georgiev's statement is neither obsolete nor contested. Georgiev offers invaluable information about the toponymity of the area. Of course it's completely unhistorical to claim that a proto-Greek area existed much later ...in the hellenistic era. Alexikoua (talk) 21:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of uncontested scholarly statement
Talk:Tilman Riemenschneider

message: The article is based on the German and French Wikipedia articles about Riemenschneider. RFB
The material about people living in Arizona and Pennsylvania who ended up having the same last name as this sculptor has absolutely nothing to do with this sculptor and should not be in an article about this sculptor.69.86.126.190 (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - cut. Johnbod (talk) 04:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Schism of the Russian Church

message: How about changing the name of the article to, for example, the Schism of Old Beleivers to follow the policy to use English terms except when necessary? And keep raskol entry as aredirect, of course. Maybe there are better names. Just a suggestion. --Irpen 08:56, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
* I think the name is rather OK. It is the known term. I've read about a book of some Pierre Paskal 'Avvakum et les débuts du raskol'. It looks like the word is known not only in Russia, but also abroad. Am I right? Arseni 09:07, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with this proposal. Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hearing no objections I've moved the page. Strange Quirk (talk) 03:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Change name

message: As I posted elsewhere, 'raskol' is only seen in critical editions of Crime and Punishment. The Old Believers are quite obscure from the American point of view (and I would guess, from the British and Australian one as well; the Canadians do have some experience with them). As an article name Old Believers is fine, as this is the usual English term on the few occasions you come across it. If you want a neutral synonym for 'schism', try 'secession', and when describing the people themselves, 'dissenters', or even, 'refusnik' (a fine Rus-glish portmanteau).--FourthAve 03:38, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Crime and Punishment

message: I think it's worth mentioning that the schism happened the same year as the Pereyaslav Rada and that Nikon was influenced by Kiev clerics, who used newer translations etc. A couple of sources come to mind: Nikolai Trubetskoy and Victor Zhivov. Sergivs-en (talk) 08:30, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ukrainian influence
Talk:Sex Discrimination Act 1975

message: The Act as passed in 1975 makes no reference to transgendered, so the opening sentence is unfactual. I will amend it, as the Act was amended. Emeraude 17:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transgendered 

message: Neither of the links link to the intended pages. Raz.you.up (talk) 10:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Elections in Kuwait

message: Quoth the article:
:Male citizens over 21 years of age and who can trace their ancestry in Kuwait to before 1920 are entitled to vote. On May 16, 2005 ... the Parliament ... allowed all women ages 21 and up to vote.
Are women also required to fulfill the grandfather clause imposed on men? --Jfruh 20:47, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Different rules for men and women?
Talk:Max Koegel

message: His name was Max Koegel, not Kögel. Different in german. See here. --87.165.96.139 (talk) 00:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Koegel's WW I service storyline contains errata (or rather falsifications, notorious for Nazi Party officials, interested in fatten up and dramatize their war service record): first, he joined bavarian army in 1914, 1. Schweres Reiter Regiment in Munich, and stayed with this cavalry outfit for the first year of the war, then in 1915/16 he changed to Jägertruppe and later was with 2. and 1. Bavarian Infantry Regiments. That he was wounded more than two times seems questionable, otherwise he would very likely be rewarded with Verwundetenabzeichen in Silber (2nd class of that decoration; in fact he got the 3rd class, Verwundetenabzeichen in Schwarz). Finally, he was never promoted, not even to Gefreiter, and stayed without rank for the whole war (see: Official service certificate, issued May 27, 1937, in: Wartime military roster, Kriegsstammrolle No. 4451 - Königlich Bayerisches 2. Infanterie-Regiment, I. Ersatzbataillon, 6. Kompagnie - picture 294, at ancestry.com, revised May 2, 2019). --129.187.244.19 (talk) 07:23, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errata / WW I
Talk:Crab-eating fox

message: I thought the Greek for fox was alopex, not kerdo. --Corsican Warrah (talk) 21:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: The picture shows a short-eared dog, not a crab-eating fox  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.208.149 (talk) 00:54, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong picture 

message: They recently discovered an hybrid of this animal (mother) with a dog (father) in Brazil (RS) using mitochondrial dna 2804:71EC:217:6900:6173:82F5:2266:D5AB (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hybrid with dogs
Talk:Open skies

message: I think this is more or less OK now, so I will cast it adrift and let the world decide.
David91
There seems to be only one discussion page for "Open Skies" and "Open skies" It also seems as if Open Skies is more of a product advertisement than an article Kardous 16:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arborea

message: Isn't there a "the" missing?
I would suppose
" Other giudicatos fell sooner or later, and the last, the giudicato of Arborea successfully resisted Aragonese for longest time"
should read
" Other giudicatos fell sooner or later, and the last, the giudicato of Arborea successfully resisted the Aragonese for longest time" unless Aragonese is considered a language, not a people. Pdn 21:08, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Arborea was built in 1920s and was never been seat of the Giudicato (Oristano and Tharros were). The name Arborea was just taken in honour to Sardinian historical region Arborea.
--Carnot13 18:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Giudicato of Arborea
Talk:Fall Out Boy

message: Joe Trohman is not a former member. Just because he’s taking a temporary hiatus from the band doesn’t mean he’s not a member of the band anymore. 2601:40D:4280:EFD0:871:5C69:C414:DF98 (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Lemonaka (talk) 01:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:   - This has been fixed. Bowling is life (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2023 

message: Hello! My issue is with the section:
"Current touring musicians
Olivia Ford – keyboards, percussion, backing vocals (2023–present)"
I cannot find a single source about who this Olivia person is, and she definitely was not onstage at their most recent tour. The only thing that comes up is a Reddit post from this past April also asking who she is (to which no one on r/falloutboy had an answer). Constellationz (talk) 13:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Deauthorized. (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 August 2023 

message: Remove Olivia Ford as a current touring musician. There is no source provided, and this does not seem to be reliable information. 98.183.209.247 (talk) 16:46, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Deauthorized. (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 August 2023 (2) 

message: Remove Olivia Ford as a touring member. No evidence that such a person is associated with Fall Out Boy, and the user that made these edits has since been blocked for disruptive editing Listerian (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Deauthorized. (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 August 2023 

message: Change main photo in information box to a full band photo. Literallyjustv (talk) 00:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 November 2023
Talk:Julie Clary

message: The Clary family of France were silk sellers, not soap dealers.  Several of the Wikipedia biographies, including Desiree Clary's, are incorrect.  Flora boyer
====================
The tone of this article is inappropriate for an encyclopedia.
---------------------------  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.81.136.233 (talk) 03:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done my best to make this article more neutral today. I also removed unecessary genealogy, which alsways seem to fill article sof French nobility. --85.226.44.210 (talk) 14:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The tone of this article is inappropriate for an encyclopedia.
---------------------------  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.81.136.233 (talk) 03:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done my best to make this article more neutral today. I also removed unecessary genealogy, which alsways seem to fill article sof French nobility. --85.226.44.210 (talk) 14:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ========
Talk:Rule of three

message: Disambiguating.... --217.231.217.110 21:22, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Isnt that something you might want to bring up in the associated article, where the content of the relevant article may be discussed, and not here in the disambiguous page? 134.204.1.226 (talk) 19:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Rules of three are an age old rhetorical tactic.  Its well known by rhetoricians and public speakers that listing things in threes aids memory, builds structure, without overwhelming the listener.  If we were to list out every rule of three thats ever been this page would be hundreds of lines long.  This page can never be complete, and I think the feasibility of this article ought to be discussed, considering its nature.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.204.1.226 (talk) 19:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Infinite Rules of Three
Talk:Rob Halford

message: What's with reference number 13?  What does it "refer" to? 71.228.112.175 (talk) 20:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: The Halford side group name is clearly Two.  Stylization for merchandising purposes does not change a legal name (hence, there is no P!nk or H∞bastank, nor is there a film titled The VVitch).
The Wikipedia Manual of Style is quite clear on this.  2601:3CA:204:F860:D03B:A20C:C274:EFE3 (talk) 05:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are we using "2wo"? 

message: Id like to enjoy the priest in Nürnberg. I want a seet next to you. I think it woud be the last concert that i will enter.please excus my ugly english. Plaese help to get a seat next to the tribune. 2003:CE:972D:3610:3050:644F:AF82:80 (talk) 22:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passmann or Tommy
Talk:Spring Hill Cemetery (Nashville, Tennessee)

message: I am deleting :Porter Wagoner for a very good reason — :as of 2005 he is not interred anywhere as he is still alive.  He may well be a lot owner at Spring Hill, I don't know, but is currently not there, at least as of yet.
Rlquall 21:40, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Port Moody-Westwood

message: I believe the 1999 boundary change (from Port Moody-Burnaby) is too significant of a population shift to merit listing on this page. It would be very misleading. The change involved removing Burnaby Mountain (SFU) and neighbourhoods in Burnaby for the brand new Coquitlam neighbourhood of Westwood.
Westwood is a major growth area. In 1996, Westwood was forest. By 2001 it added about 10,000 people. See 2001 Stats.
-16 May 2005  maclean25
*I agree. Only list results for the riding that occurred under this name (which was newly  created in 2001). If, however, a riding shifts boundaries but keeps the same name, include the results and note the boundary changes under History. DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:40, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone else heard of the electoral commission suggesting a split of this riding, that's the current word on the street, I hear.TotallyTempo 10:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1999 Boundary Change
Talk:Våler, Innlandet

message: Perhaps someone would care to put a summary of the above discussion in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Norway as a guide to how an ideal municipality article might look like? -- Egil 12:13, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that'd be a good idea. But I'd like to finish the article about Våler first. Bengt Olav Olsen 15:05, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary