lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bistrica ob Sotli

message: A new user has been trying to replace the current image of the New Fire Station Mass Grave site, which corresponds to the location mapped here, with a (low-quality) image of the fire station. The user's edit summaries and comments here seem to indicate that he/she is confusing the grave site with the fire station and is also having difficulty understanding the English text. The user agrees that there is a mass grave at the site, but has not offered any sources indicating that the mapped location is incorrect. Doremo (talk) 04:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be great if you could provide additional information about this particular site, as you offer above. The current picture shows the site marked at the Geopedia link, where it states that the location has been precisely defined ("Lokacija natančno določena"). Perhaps you can provide a local newspaper article or some other material not available online. The photo you uploaded is overexposed and the building is leaning sideways. Or, perhaps you could take a new photo from approximately this angle (with the fire station vertical), showing at least some of the grassy area south of the fire station. Doremo (talk) 12:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

text: Thank you for providing a better-quality photo. Doremo (talk) 12:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Fire Station Mass Grave
Talk:Simeon the Holy Fool

message: This article is full of religious claims like 'he healed the sick with prayer' and so forth. These are magical claims, obviously not supported by any evidence, so what does one do about them? Just remove them? I think if we know who historically made the claims you could say that, but here they are just saying it like it's fact.--Murky Falls (talk) 06:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Religious claims
File talk:Map of Canada by State's most common ethnic ancestries.PNG

message: It may be a good idea to define "Canadian ancestry". Canada is a mix of many different backgrounds and the term "Canadian Ancestory" is somewhat ambiguous. Where did these particular Canadians come from?
Aroy02 (talk) 08:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Considering that 80% of the Quebec population is French-speaking and also considering the political reality in Quebec, it seems very doubtful that most of the population consider themselves of "Canadian" ancestry over "French". The source of the information should be confirmed; otherwise the map should be removed if the source cannot be proven.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.96.218.69 (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems pretty obvious that the Canadian government classifies "Quebecois" as Canadian. Come to think of it, they probably classify "Albertan" as "Canadian" too... 76.175.180.98 (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quebec's ancestry color is doubtful
Talk:Operation Phantom Phoenix

message: Lawrencema (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 signature 

message: My good friend Zack McBride lost his life on Day 2 of this operation.
Hopefully the mission will be successful - and may he, and all those that lost their lives in the war, rest in peace.
75.163.165.195 (talk) 08:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: and the post before me is sad..sorry  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.35.146 (talk) 09:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  i think this page need clean up 

message: I think the days should be changed from say "Day 1" to "January 8" for example. I'd change it myself, but I want to make sure everyone agrees first
Lawrencema (talk) 02:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change from days to dates 

message: To which of the many militia groups in Iraq does "Iraqi militia" refer to in the infobox? Does it refer to Mahdi militia, the Awakening groups, or other groups? Lawrencema (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iraqi militia 

message: The article is not consistent with the form to use. Choose one. PKKloeppel (talk) 02:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: al Qaeda or al Qaida

message: The info box for this article shows a rather curious mix of military men and politicians as commanders, i.e. :
David Petraeus (US general)
Gordon Brown (UK prime minister)
Babaker Shawkat Zebari (Iraqi general)
Davit Kezerashvili (Ukranian minister of defence)
How come? RASAM (talk) 13:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixture
Talk:Judie Brown

message: if you're going to say 'it was founded around my kitchen table', should you not say who you are? 87.80.20.41 (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 comment

message: "Brown has been a leading expert on the sanctity of human life" - source? reference? link? Methinks this is just yet another Conservative deceit. UnsubRumNo NeoCon deceit here! 22:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Says who?

message: While the mexicofootballnews.info/ looks legit, it is too problematic for a BLP. It gives the name of siblings & parents, but does not verify that these Browns are the ones referenced.  – S. Rich (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  info on children 
File talk:Stereotype threat gender.jpg

message: Someone really needs to explain this graph.  What the heck is low ST vs. high ST?  What the heck is the vertical axis?  What was the procedure and conditions for this test?  What is this graph at all?  I have no idea. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 08:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ST stand for Stereotype Threat-- it was a math test under conditions of threat vs. those without threat. See the original study: Linking Stereotype Threat and Anxiety  Jason W. Osborne. North Carolina State University, Educational Psychology, v27 n1 p135-154 Feb 2007 futurebird (talk) 09:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is ST?
Talk:Odyssey Moon

message: So one can assume from the complete inactivity on this page that any nominal similarities with the recent landing of a craft on the Moon is completely co-incidental. Indeed, there seems to be nothing n Wikipedia about it.Meerta (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: The article is decidedly lacking status on this ambitious speculative venture.  No reason not to have the article, but then the article should definitely be updated since most sources are from 2008.
Have they built anything?  Prototypes?  Validation efforts?  Current plans for date of making something non-terrestrial happen?  Etc.  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: , the article is still quite dated.  Among other problems, it does not reflect current project status, funding, nor team members.  The founder/designer Robert D. Richards has left the Isle of Man-based Odyssey Moon project to join the Moon Express team where he is, per sources in those articles, the Team Leader and CEO of the company.  This article STILL needs an update, if the project is yet active.  N2e (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 update is needed 

message: I just have a question about airbags -- would they work on the moon? Odyssey Moon can carry a 50kg payload, but Spirit and Opportunity were 185kg payloads and were able to land just fine with airbags. The twin rovers did have parachutes to slow their descent but I think an airbag system could still be more efficient on the moon even if cold gas thrusters are needed to do the work of parachutes. It just seems like a much simpler design. There are even shock absorption systems designed for 60000 g as detailed here: http://zaguan.unizar.es/TAZ/EINA/2012/7674/TAZ-PFC-2012-311_ANE.pdf Nydoc1 (talk) 01:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do airbags work on the moon? 

message: As of September 2014 Odyssey was acquired by Space Services Inc Source. Should this page now redirect to Space Services Inc. and a footnote inserted as to the activities of Odyssey? Roobens (talk) 17:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Space Inc Page?
Talk:Oil cleansing method

message: Pleeease add stuff about whether it's actually scientifically valid.  is there really a mechanism by which the skin produces more oil when it's dry?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.224.66.136 (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

message: R M K   Cleansing oil 0.1 FL .OZ.   3ML  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.223.251 (talk) 13:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made in japan  

message: There are 0 credible news sources talking about OCM aside from magazines. There is almost no scientific research on topical application of oils for cleansing. It has been tagged with  and  for over two years now. It is time this article gets deleted until this becomes more than homeopathy. - Sweet Nightmares 19:43, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary the article needs to be expanded and globalised. This is how everyone who could afford something better than water washed before soap was invented, e.g. the ancient Romans. 81.99.182.245 (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

text: Thankfully, even though not one person who contributed to the discussion understood the actual significance of the topic the article was not deleted. 81.99.182.245 (talk) 19:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 

message: I'm concerned about the references as neither appears to be a WP:reliable source. They are both published by unknown companies, which means they are no better than citing Joe Schmoe's blog post. Surely when providing a home remedy for skin cleansing, some clinical trials are required? See Olive oil#Skin, for example. - Sweet Nightmares 15:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Stone Mills

message: Why does Carmanville, Ontario redirect here?  It is not mentioned in the article and does not show up on Google Maps.  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 22:01, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carmanville, Ontario 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Carmanville, Ontario. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 20#Carmanville, Ontario until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Carmanville, Ontario" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Template talk:England counties

message: [Copied from User talk:MRSC]:
In that case I propose to make some changes, the effect of which will be to revert to two separate templates: (1) ceremonial and (2) historical, as was in place prior to your edits of 01 December 2007. Chrisieboy (talk) 14:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this not what we have now? MRSC • Talk 14:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Further changes to template

message: I've copied this template over to the ANG Wikipedia so that that wiki can get the English counties (relatively easy translation effort).  But when I go there, the translations don't seem to show on the Isle of Wight page, and I get script errors that don't show on the EN wiki.  Would someone mind helping me see what I'm doing wrong in either translating or getting the scripts to work?  Scripting is not my forté, so other than copying, I'm at a bit of a loss.  --JJohnson1701 (talk) 16:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translating for ANG
Talk:Coffee substitute

message: Perhaps the article can also inlude coffee substitutes that do not preserve taste. Rather, the substitute would hold the "morning or coffee buzz" of coffee (which some people require before getting to work). This offcourse because of cafeine or other substances.
Examples of such substitutes would include guarana drinks, Gotu kola, mate and cafeine-containing drinks as Red Bull
Please include in this article or make another article as Morning buzz
Thanks.
KVDP (talk) 09:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coffee substitutes that do not preserve taste 

message: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/01/mormon-caffeine-policy-cl_n_1848098.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.12.199 (talk) 06:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using Mormonism is incorrect for an example. 

message: Roasting Okra Seed as a Coffee Substitute. This looks rather interesting. Komitsuki (talk) 15:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roasting Okra Seed as a Coffee Substitute 

message: : For religious reasons, members of churches such as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), and the Seventh-day Adventist Church, refrain from drinking coffee,[2] but not all hot drinks;[3] some may drink a substitute.[4]
It's awkward to combine these two as they are for different reasons. SDAs do not drink coffee because it contains caffeine. However, LDSs do not drink coffee because it is a "hot drink", not because of caffeine content. LDSs drink other caffeinated beverages, SDAs do not. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 01:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I also notice that the three sources cited all are pertinant to LDS, but not to SDA. I'll try to sort that out. - Donald Albury 13:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  SDA vs LDS
Talk:Mittal Affair

message: This is a copy-and-paste of the same section in Mittal article.  I am proposing a merge or speedy deletion.  Brokenwit (talk) 09:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. The Mittal Affair should be expanded rather then deleted. More information has become available since I first wrote the section in History of Plaid Cymru and on the Mittal artical. Since then, others have added it to other sections and someone did start this as a stand alone artical. It needs expansion rather then deletion. Drachenfyre (talk) 21:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also disagree. The affair is related not only to mittal, but to blair and the labour party. I have removed tag.Jandrews23jandrews23 (talk) 22:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-01-19 Australian rules football

message: * Comment. I have been a participant in these twin discussions at Talk:Australian rules football and Talk:National sport. The problem here is that PIO is firmly of the belief that Australian Rules Football is the national sport, and other sports are merely "popular" . He bases his contentions on having been to Australia six times, and having an uncle who is an Australian citizen . Now, in no sense do I intend to disparage his knowledge of Australia, nor do I mean that his edits are in bad faith, but to be able to judge what a country's national sports are often requires intuition or a certain sense of how the people of that country themselves view the situation to be able to judge. I'm not Australian either - I'm English - which is why I have generally kept my thoughts to the talk pages. 
:Other editors have in various ways tried to explain the problem  and proposed compromise wordings . Unfortunately PIO has not commented upon these, nor proposed any alternative compromise.
:Throughout the edit war over this issue on both articles, PIO has sought to say that Australian Rules Football is the national sport and the most popular sport. To be fair, he has made efforts to find sources to support this opinion. However, he has consistently, and sometimes belligerently   reverted the edits made by other users to his own version, removing references to other sports that may have a claim to be called one of the national sports of Australia, including removing sources that disagree with his opinion  . He has made no effort via the talk pages to reach consensus; he has used talk pages only to disparage the view that there are any other sports in Australia worthy of being called national sports . Regarding the quality of sources, PIO disparages the Sweeney Report where it doesn't say what he wants it to say , but is very happy to use other surveys where it suits his opinion to do so Sports Attendance, Australian Bureau of Statistics, April 1999 Australia's attendance 2006 as well as throw in Google searches and leave the reader to try to work out what the source is for themselves Site sportbusiness. Overall, my view is that the current impasse is a result of one editor who has a fixed POV being entirely unwilling to seek consensus or even discuss the matter. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:WJLX

message: IIUC, skeptics of the "stolen" tower/transmitter claim suppose that both the high-profile tower and associated transmitter equipment (invisible to public) disappeared a while ago. Many have analyzed past street-level images, e.g. Google Street View, and satellite images, claiming the  transmitter tower (obvious shadow on sat images) has been missing for some time. Internet sleuths seem to have done a thorough job in this regard, e.g. YCombinator post. Anyway, was AM license just a sneaky attempt to run an FM on the cheap (via W268BM)? Look for credible broadcast industry sources for FCC tower, transmitter logistics, licensing rules, translator regs. Also, ham radio people know about this translator stuff. Doug Grinbergs (talk) 12:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There's going to have to be some sort of reliable / professional media coverage to add any of that to the article. See WP:RS. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  TLDR: AM transmitter, tower drama
Talk:Ceangăi

message: Why Ceangai and not Csango??? See Council of Europe Recommendation ...--fz22 (talk) 10:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Csango 

message: this is a suggestive start of this "NPOV" article ... I mean speaking about the Kingdom of Poland before any reflection on the Kingdom of Hungary to whom that region belonged to in those times ... funny :))) When the first Csangos arrived near the Siret river, the Kingdom of Poland was not in vicinity ... (see Duchy of Halych)
The Poles started to interfere in the Csango's religious problems right after the Battle of Mohacs, and in the period of reformation in Transylvania ... --fz22 (talk) 10:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  relation with the Polish Kingdom and Papal State
Talk:Software Peter principle

message: Surely this idea of the Software Peter principle overlaps very much with Greenspun's Tenth Rule of "Any sufficiently complicated [Cpp (heir of Fortran)] program contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of [Python (heir of Lisp)]"? How then should we inter-link or merge those two articles? Pelavarre (talk) 17:40, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greenspun's Tenth Rule 

message: I see three or four things in this article
# the subject comes from a book
# it has to do with projects dying by rising complexity
# three seemingly random software project problems are listed as causes
What's missing is a definition of the subject.
A "principle" is usually summarized in a brief statement, like Brook's Law or the Peter Principle. 
JöG (talk) 10:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: So what is it?

message: The conceptual integrity of software is a measure of how well it conforms to a single, simple set of design principles, according to The Mythical Man Month by Fred Brooks[citation needed]. When done properly, it provides the most functionality using the simplest idioms. It makes software easier to use by making it simple to create and learn[citation needed].
Conceptual integrity is achieved when the software’s design proceeds from a small number of agreeing individuals[citation needed]. For software to maintain conceptual integrity, the design must be controlled by a single, small group of people who understand the code (including the nature of how all the subroutines and variables interact) in depth.
In projects without a strong software architecture team, the task of design is often combined with the task of implementation and is implicitly delegated among the individual software developers. Under these circumstances, developers are less likely to sacrifice personal interests in favor of the interests of the product. The complexity of the product grows as a result of developers adding new designs and altering earlier ones to reflect changes in fashion and individual taste.
This passage mirrors the concept of Brooks' Surgical Team, which was still somewhat in vogue in the 1980s, but hasn't been seen much since. In the early stages of the PC revolution, more than half of all programmers had degrees in physics (by aptitude) or psychology (by necessity) or something of that nature. Additionally, the discipline wasn't terribly mature, and there wasn't a great body of practice to fall back upon (which is what made Mythical so exceptional, back in the day). 
I'm not even sure this precept is still relevant to most software projects, which these days usually start with a substantial stack, with a fair amount of decomposition preordained.  
My vote would be to rewrite portions of this article more in a diagnostic vein: here are some of the known shoot-self-in-foot software complexity failure modes, and here are some possible antidotes, should you need them. In doing so, we should back away from blanket wisdom, and programming lore that predates the Hudson's Bay point blanket. — MaxEnt 01:17, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dated OR passage
Talk:Admiral Farragut Academy

message: "Approximately 75% of the students are day students."  So, folks drive up and deposit seamen?
: Well played. Well played...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.80.129.37 (talk) 14:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewrite completedWkharrisjr (talk) 15:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Witmer Stone

message: Why was the dispersal of the trivia section edit reverted in the article, ? The Manual of Style states that trivia sections are to be avoided, and there is a cleanup box in the trivia section requesting it to be relocated to proper sections, so why would it be necessary to revert the edit? Pagliaccious (talk) 14:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia section
Talk:United States Institute for Theatre Technology

message: USITT is an integral part of the professional theatre community, which is why it was bizarre that there was no Wikipedia article for it.  Please feel free to contribute your expertise to this page and expand it. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 10:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There was an article for a long time (I created it...) but it was removed after someone said it violated copyright rules.  I couldn't figure out what they meant and no one else could either so it was removed..... Charlie Richmond (talk) 07:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wasn't the text for that article taken directly from the USITT website? If so, that was the copyright violation. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 08:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My original article was not copied from anything but I did notice someone replaced it with new copy.  I didn't know where it came from though and when the violation was cited it did not clarify why the violation occurred.  I guess we'll see what happens next and watch out for this happening again....  Charlie Richmond (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Hi, I'm the chapter historian for USITT@PSU, and one of my goals this year was to expand this page. I was the one who was adding stuff about national conference. i'll try to continue expanding in my copious amounts of free time.--Jmansker (talk) 02:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw some people from PSU at this year's conference, and I just want to say you guys are awesome.  My recommendations on expanding this page: How USITT helps the theater communities and a detailed history. Andrew Donnelly (talk) 06:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please expand this article
Talk:Mosetse

message: Mosetse is one of the oldest villages in the area and has served as a centre for all the villages around including Dukwe. Dukwe was then developed for purposes of supporting the refugee camp under the UNHCR. 
It was an area predominantly for the Basarwa until cattle farmers among them Mr Mahomed Montshiwa, Mr Brown Nfila (then made chief), Mr Kehitile Madubeko and Ngwato Farmers associated with the Sereste Khama's family.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.33.11.13 (talk) 15:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)