lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Radiator Springs Racers

message: This article is WAY too early to exist.  Yes, it will exist eventually, but I strongly recommend that it be deleted (and properly #redirected) until we have factual, solid information about the attraction. The way the article stands right now is absolutely horrid.  Thoughts? SpikeJones 22:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed AfD

message: Paul Newman was added as doing the voice in this ride.  He died almost four years ago, so how did he do the voice in the ride?  Does the ride include clips from the movie?  Needs a reference.  72Dino (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Newman 

message: Davidcrown has added content about the most frequent rider of this attraction. I reverted it because it seemed trivial and, most importantly, supported by only a blog and a YouTube video. Instead of discussing the addition on the talk page, he added it again. So, I am taking it to the talk page so other editors can discuss if this is appropriate content. Thanks, Bahooka (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Bahooka is correct. This is trivial in terms of an encyclopedia article for the attraction, which is not a "forum" as was described above. The individual's achievement is not notable, as coverage of the story is only local in origin (if a national newscast covered it, maybe). Thus, it fails WP:NOTNEWS.  --McDoobAU93 19:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most frequent rider
Category talk:Fires in the Republic of Ireland

message: There is a need for articles on a number of important fires in Ireland, namely
the Drumcollogher, Co. Limerick cinema fire of 1926 (48 dead)
the Noyeks fire, Dublin of 1972 (8 dead)
the Loreto Convent school fire, Stephens Green  Dublin 1986 (6 dead)Coolavokig (talk) 11:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Irish fires
Talk:A Place to Bury Strangers

message: Hello Wikipedians,
The discography section of this article is missing the early self-released EPs, Re-Pinned LP, and a few post-2018 releases. Would an editor like to update, please?
The missing titles include:
* Re-Pinned (Dead Oceans, 2018) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-Re-Pinned/master/1436890
* A Place To Bury Strangers 3-song CD/EP (self-released, 2004) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers/release/10793847
* Missing You CD/EP (self-released, 2006) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-Missing-You/release/1755353
* A Place to Bury Strangers 6-song CD/EP (self-released, 2006) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers/release/7726846
* Breathe CD/EP (self-released, 2006) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-Breathe/release/1755376
* Petty Empire / Get Away From Me 7" (Mute, 2015) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-Petty-Empire-Get-Away-From-Me/release/10960791
* Kicking Out Jams 7" (Famous Class, 2016) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-Kicking-Out-Jams/master/984561
* Fuzz Club Sessions 12" EP (Fuzz Club Records, 2019) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-Fuzz-Club-Sessions/master/1502526
* Ice Cream Sucks 7" (self-released, 2019) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-Ice-Cream-Sucks/release/13625130
* Rare Meat cassette (self-released, 2017) https://www.discogs.com/A-Place-To-Bury-Strangers-Rare-Meat-Demos-And-Rarities-2003-2017/release/11937052
SavoryPony (talk) 18:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography
Talk:Ballybeg Priory

message: This monastery is, from what I've seen, more commonly referred to as Ballybeg Priory than as Ballybeg Abbey. However, in official documents, such as the Heritage churches book published by Cork County Council, and in the record of National Monuments in State Care, it's called Ballybeg Abbey. Should the article be moved to Ballybeg Abbey to reflect this? Cheers, Xx78900 (talk) 23:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Red Abbey, Cork

message: Just uploaded two images to wikimedia of the western and southern sides with a bit more detail. Feel free to use them here if you would like:
File:Red Abbey, Cork (western side).JPG|Red Abbey Tower, Cork. Western face.
File:Red Abbey, Cork (Southern side).JPG|Red Abbey Tower, Cork. Southern face.
nutterguy (talk) 23:50, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kilmacduagh monastery

message: Seems that there are not a lot of RS online. I have a couple of books that cover the issue...but they unfortunately are all in my house in Ireland. :-( 
There is some stuff here , but I would not rate it as a RS on this topic. Lonely Planet  refers to the cathedral as 14th century, but I am not sure how well researched that was.
Also, a speaker of Irish might want to look at the Irish place names and change the spelling to the current preferred version - these were taken from a journal article from 1904. I definitely remember seeing "Teampuil" being spelled quite differently...
Drow69 (talk) 15:20, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some input
Talk:Euroflag

message: This probably does need a merge (or improvement) ... but I reverted it as caught up in other merges that were not properly attributed.  If I have time I do a merge proposal but I'd need to check it out first.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge or delete, it really in not all that notable in its own right.Slatersteven (talk) 12:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really compatible with merge with Airbus Defence and Space and keep as a redirect, not notable enough for its own page. Slatersteven (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That will be because I am in two minds over even having a merge (what is there to merge?). I also note that Airbus military is also not muich more then a stub.Slatersteven (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The problems arise from the merges into Airbus Defence and Space of Astrium, Airbus Military, and Euroflag.  The was no discussion for these merges, none were properly attributed by the person doing the merge but Euroflag was attributed by someone else later.  I was concerned, rightly or wrongly, Astrium should be been pre-discussed because it is at least of mid-importance and correct structure is being maintained.  Leaving a mad merge in place for a length of time is bad so all were backed out by me.  Good citizen I am seeing Euroflag unreferenced I added the necessary, which may or may not be useful.  A properly done redirect noting with history and printworthy and possibly categories would also likely be acceptable to me. of Euroflag.   Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

text: Euroflag was nothing to do with Airbus, they contracted them to take over the production and development. Not all participants were related to the Airbus Group so to merge would not seem reasonable. Just need to improve this article. MilborneOne (talk) 22:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Quin Abbey

message: There are excellent photos here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Quin_Abbey Can they be used in the Quin Abbey article? I'm not sure how to go about this. Mygodfrey (talk) 17:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20071119170318/http://www.clarelibrary.ie/eolas/coclare/places/quininterest.htm and http://www.monastic.ie/history/quin-franciscan-friary/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Fokker D.III

message: This currently reads:
On Boelcke's recommendation, the D.III was replaced by the the new Albatros D.I on the Western Front. Weyl 1965, p. 171. The Albatros became standard equipment in German fighter squadrons as sufficient examples became available.Lamberton 1960, p. 108
I would prefer:
On Boelcke's recommendation, the Albatros rather than the D.III became standard equipment in German fighter squadrons as sufficient examples became available, replacing the assortment of early Halberstadt and Fokker fighters that formed their initial equipment. Weyl 1965, p. 171. Lamberton 1960, p. 108
If no one has any objection I will edit the passage in this sense shortly.
--Soundofmusicals (talk) 01:41, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boelcke's recommendation
Talk:Gotha Go 244

message: Some of the performance data are obviously wrong.  Especially egregious is the rate of climb (5000 meters per minute).  Even with the most powerful engines listed in the article (the BMW of 960 hp), assuming 2 engines with 95% installed efficiency and 75% propeller efficiency and no drag from the rest of the airframe, the rate of climb is only 840 meters (2762 feet) per minute.Raymondwinn (talk) 20:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Obvious Error in Performance Data

message: I went out and did a general search and there are lots and lots of pictures out there for the Go 244.
It is an interesting looking aircraft, and hard to imagine in your head.
Someone who understands the copyright issues and knows how to properly upload a picture to WIKI would do visitors a great service by putting a couple of pictures into this article.
James 203.150.155.17 (talk) 11:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick search on Google with my tablet doesn't turn up any obvious copyright images available. (Granted, my tablet's search ability is limited, so I'll try later from a PC.) Because it's so similar to the Go 242, I doubt any copyright images can be used under fair use, but we could add a Go 242 instead, but not to the infobox in the lead. BilCat (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture??
Talk:Commercial Iron Works

message: *Mentioned in Google Books search
*Just a mention from Germans from Russia in Portland, but lots of early Portland business info there.
*Photos, including CIW yards
There's a couple more in my Google search. Katr67 23:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for expansion 
Talk:Plasă

message: I suspect that this page should become a disambig page for its previous use (Professional Lighting and Sound Association) now moved to PLASA and this Romanian use.  Failing that, is there a more suitable way of coupling the articles? SheffGruff 23:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Any recent update about any talks or discussion about adding plasă as an administrative sub-division unit between the county (județ) and the municipal unit (comună, municipiu, oraș)? jlog3000 (talk) 14:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update about the plasă
Talk:Shout Out Louds

message: I noticed that the individual members do not have pages.  There popularity as a band has increased enough that I feel they should be created.  Detractors?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.152.239.131 (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band Member Pages 
Talk:Formal and material principles of theology

message: The distinction between Formal principle and Material principle seems very dubious.  It purports to follow the well-known distinction between form and matter, but appears to be little more than a hatchet job.
The article lacks references to make the distinction meaningful.  Who precisely makes such distinctions?  What sort of theological context do they make them in?  What are the underlying assumptions behind them?  We are given no precise way to make such a determination.  As such the distinction seems fairly useless in practice.
--Sophroniscus 23:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that by redirecting the two articles into one helps to facilitate understanding of this. I think that more sources need to be found that support these categories of theology, and adherents of other faiths could make sure that the designations are NPOV.--Drboisclair (talk) 20:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unstated Assumptions
Talk:Material principle

message: The distinction between Formal principle and Material principle seems very dubious.  It purports to follow the well-known distinction between form and matter, but appears to be little more than a hatchet job.
The article lacks references to make the distinction meaningful.  Who precisely makes such distinctions?  What sort of theological context do they make them in?  What are the underlying assumptions behind them?  We are given no precise way to make such a determination.  As such the distinction seems fairly useless in practice.
--Sophroniscus 23:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unstated Assumptions
Talk:JDM Roitelet

message: Avions JDM, the manufacturer, appears to have only worked upon one sole aircraft, the JDM Roitelet, as well as only had a brief existence. Aside from a single prototype, it does not appear to have engaged in any other manufacturing effort or significant business activity. The manufacturer, unlike the aircraft, is not plausibly going to progress beyond a single line; instead of repeating the aircraft article's information, I propose that it simply be merged together. Kyteto (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 11:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Avions JDM]] to [[JDM Roitelet]]
Talk:Breakthrough bleeding

message: How common is it for stress to cause Intermenstrual as well as Breakthrough bleeding? It would seem from any sort of research that stress is a very common cause of these problems. Shouldn't stress be added to this article as a common cause? 2601:98A:480:C080:F145:82C8:F1E0:8E52 (talk) 05:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

message: The article stated that "Breakthrough bleeding may also itself be a symptom of pregnancy (contraceptive failure)."  Does this mean that it usually happens in pregnancies that result specifically because of contraceptive failure, i.e. when women on the pill (or other contraceptives?) fall pregnant?  Or does breakthrough bleeding also occur with intended pregnancies?  As far as I know, bleeding due to pregnancy might occur during implantation, and therefore doesn't have anything to do with contraception.  Based on this - and the fact that no sources are given for this statement - I removed it;  but if anyone has more specific information available, feel free to change it back.
--Leviel (talk) 13:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pregnancy
Talk:Hereditary breast–ovarian cancer syndrome

message: This article uses the acronym "BOC" then goes on to describe a hereditary condition and use the acronym "HBOC", which seems more accurate. Should this article be renamed to "Hereditary breast-ovarian cancer" with a redirect from this title?
And in fact, based on this, I am going to be bold and try a rename. Franamax (talk) 09:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Eudora Welty House

message: I have updated the site to include a section about the Visitor Center. The tour hours are updated. The images are updated. Publiccorrectionsmdah (talk) 14:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 Changes
Talk:EGBUS

message: the article is in need of a template.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.41.52 (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article needs a template page to link it to other medical articles 

message: I added this to List of medical abbreviations. Given that it is otherwise self-explanatory, there doesn't need to be an entire article on this when an entry on the medical abbreviations page will do. Chaldor (talk) 00:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  added to [[List of medical abbreviations]]
Talk:Endometritis

message: Happened on 11/8/23 show.  Has now spread far and wide, and I mean WORLD WIDE.  I'm looking for what might be done to to stop/correct this situation.  Any ideas? 66.112.171.110 (talk) 13:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whooping Goldberg's confusion of endometriosis with endometritis on The View
Talk:Gynecologic hemorrhage

message: Much of this article looks to have been lifted from a textbook without attribution.  For example, "The anovulation chapter..."— Preceding unsigned comment added by JakartaDean (talk • contribs) 07:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 

message: How is gyencologic hemorrhage different from menorrhagia??? 182.255.99.214 (talk) 05:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gyencologic hemorrhage vs Menorrhagia??? - same ting???
Talk:Hymenotomy

message: I've removed the unreferenced tag... while there's only one citation, it's quite adequate. The claim that the article does not cite any references or sources (my emphasis) is plainly laughable. Andrewa (talk) 09:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Laughable

message: "Sexual intercourse remains possible a hymenotomy, labia minora reduction, surgical and radiological cancer treatments and chemotherapy of the vulvo-vaginal area." This appears to be ungrammatical. I would correct it if I had any clear idea what it is intended to mea. Any ideas? Paul B (talk) 19:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing sentence
Talk:Hysterotomy

message: — Assignment last updated by J.su ucsf (talk) 16:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Foundations II

message: Our goals for this article include:
* Adding images to the article
* New section: Medical uses 
* New section: Risks/complications
* New section: Technique
* New section: Recovery
* Enhance description of hysterotomy 
Joanneguan (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2022 Group 10 proposed edits

message: *Question 1: Do the group's edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review "Guiding Framework"? 
Overall, I think the group did a good job of adding separate sections and organized the article well. I like the visual aids as well because it's helpful for the topic. One thing that I noticed that needs some improvement is the sentence structure in the article. A few of the paragraphs have to be checked for correct sentence structure, like the Lead paragraph and the Caesarean Section, etc. The group should also pay attention to grammar and spelling errors because I noticed a few ones that need editing. The majority of the content looks like was taken from academic journals and related to the topic. A few of the dates on the citations need to be edited to the correct format. Overall, I think the group has made great progress and is on the road to having a complete article.Mirna.kal (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review by Group 13
Talk:International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

message: The current :International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics#Member associations section is unsourced, excessively detailed and also a problem per :WP:NOTDIRECTORY. It would be much better to replace the list of names with a short paragraph containing sourced content about the federation's international membership, etc. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Member associations
Talk:Loop electrical excision procedure

message: https://www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/a28798959/leep-side-effects-risks-sexual-pleasure-loss/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.207.128.12 (talk) 19:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Plan to expand the section relating to sexual side effects and more subjective accounts, not just absence of dysmenorrhea/dyspareunia. Apetko3 (talk) 14:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thousands of women undergo LEEPs every year without being informed of a potentially devastating result: the loss of their ability to enjoy sex. Cosmo investigates why doctors aren’t taking this side effect more seriously. =

message: — Assignment last updated by Hcarter24 (talk) 01:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor
Talk:Maternal–fetal medicine

message: I’m hoping to expand this article in the coming days (April 5th through the 8th) by:	
# adding a lead section, picture, and info box
# 2.	including a history of the development of this specialty 
# 3.	refining spectrum of care 
# 4.	adding relevant international organizations and common journals
In addition, I plan to increase the links to other wiki articles,  and provide more external links/further reading. 
I had initially planned to change the name to “perinatology”, but google ngram viewer seems to show that the term “maternal-fetal medicine” has overtaken “perinatology” in recent literature. Any feedback is more than welcome!
Fairlycromulent (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  My plans for this page
Talk:Nugent score

message: If you are an editor who would like to help improve this article please enjoy this hearty welcome and expression of appreciation.  Since it is a newly created article, it is possible to set some pretty high standards right from the start (we want to give the encyclopedia increased credibility and reliable).  Please feel free to discuss this list article freely and with the goal of further improvement and expansion – your opinion matters!  Best Regards,
:Barbara (WVS) (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome! 

message: Please discuss any proposed merges here on the talk page before merging this article with another. There are more references and more content that are ready to be inserted. This article is by no means complete and I am requesting other editors refrain from deleting content without discussing it first on this talk page. Thank you and Best Regards,
:Barbara (WVS) (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merges, blanking content 

message: Have you maybe misconstrued the Nugent's test with the Amsel criteria? Evaluating the pH, the presence of clue cells, the white discharge and the fishy odor defines the Amsel criteria. Should the sentence "Nugent's test for bacterial vaginosis is performed by measuring the pH, evaluating the presence of clue cells, white discharge an odor of amines after mixing with KOH" be removed? Best regards,
:HrEkstedt (talk) 09:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nugent's test?
Talk:Pelvic exenteration

message: This procedure may be applied to men as well as women, yet the article pertains only to this procedure in women. --Una Smith (talk) 20:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have expanded the POV but details re the procedure in men are scant and probably misleading.  --Una Smith (talk) 20:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Female biased POV