Talk:John Caudwell

message: The biography is really unusual. Is that even true? "Goldigging" does not seem too reliable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcca0553 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caudwell Group 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Caudwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160217152117/http://www.caudwellchildren.com/index.php/information/about-us/our-history to http://www.caudwellchildren.com/index.php/information/about-us/our-history
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Caudwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/fortune-s-help-children/story-12531135-detail/story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121029094402/http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/Tycoon-John-Caudwell-makes-figure-donation-secure/story-13665798-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/Tycoon-John-Caudwell-makes-figure-donation-secure/story-13665798-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello, I work for the charity Caudwell Children which John Caudwell founded and he supports heavily but holds no official role within its governance structure. 
* In the charity interests section there are references to a Times article which made speculative and unfounded claims about the services which would be provided at the Caudwell International Children's Centre and links to individuals with views that are no supported by the charity. The article uses the Times article to claim that the charity promotes unproven and dubious health practices and has aligned itself with antivaccinationists.:
* The charity strongly refutes the claims and has repeatedly evidenced the contrary, which has been supported by subsequent inspections by the Care Quality Commission. These accusations are potentially damaging to the charity's ability to support children with special educational needs and disabilities.: 
* https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-5344998286https://inews.co.uk/news/health/caudwell-centre-children-autism-model-parents-families-318307https://news.sky.com/story/first-of-its-kind-autism-centre-aims-to-dramatically-cut-diagnosis-waiting-time-11719456:
Bensutcliffe78 (talk) 16:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  The sources provided do not refute the Times article. PK650 (talk) 22:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate or misleading claims 

message: This is clearly a personal attack
Edwardx never gave an explanation for removing my changes
Why do Edwardx and Fram insist on harming a charity association ?
Where do i file a complaint about Edwardx and Fram ?
I do not know how to start a complaint, so I invite Edwardx and Fram to start a proper complaint about me Johnvandeput (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:NPOV. We represent what reliable sources have written about article subjects. While we keep out tabloid sources (e.g. the Daily Mail about the court battle between Caudwell and his ex), we include reliable, reputable sources like The Times, per WP:NPOV and WP:RS. The charities are being discussed in this article and carry his name, so including criticism of them (at an appropriate place in the body of the article, as is done here) is normal. Fram (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography must not be abused to harm charity association.