lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fontus

message: I really don't know if the photo is appropriate. That having been said, it made me laugh too hard that I can't remove it myself. --Brasswatchman 20:41, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, it's of Fonzie (The "Fonz").  Definitely not appropriate. -- Avocado 20:47, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: I need some additional evidence that there was a Temple of Fontus/Fons (what Latin word for "temple", for instance, was used in ancient sources?). I'm putting the following statement on hold pending confirmation. Since this source is not available online, I'd like to see a more extended quote of what D. says:
His temple was located outside the city walls, near the Porta Fontinalis. Cited as G. dumezil La religion romaine archaique Paris 1974 2nd; It. tr. Milano 1977 p. 334.
Richardson makes no mention of a Temple of Fontus/Fons in his entry on the Porta Fontinalis. Every reference to a fons can't go in this article; the article is trying to isolate the personified deity. RIchardson (pp. 152–153) says there was an altar, not a whole temple building or precinct, to Fons/Fontus near the tomb of Numa; he cites Cicero, De legibus 2.56, which specifies ara Fontis.  An ara to one god can be located with a templum dedicated to another deity, that is, within a larger temple complex. It doesn't mean Fons had an aedes, for instance, an actual building, much less a templum. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is what D. says, p.339 (not 334, sorry): "Fons, divinised and honoured with an ara on the Ianiculum (Cic. Leg. 2, 56), in 231 was endowed with/received a temple (tempio in It.) outside the walls, certainly before the Porta Fontinalis, and around the same time he must have been introducted into the genealogy of the "first kings" of Latium, as a son of Ianus: the affinity "spring-beginning" suggested such an affiliation". Unfortunately D. does not cite his authority, probably Livy? I did not check Platner etc., maybe they are informative.Aldrasto11 (talk) 09:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll keep my eyes open too. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temple of
Talk:Rec. 601

message: I have studied the latest version ot the Rec. ITU-R BT.601-5 and it does not determine the serial format component order. The Serial format and component order is defined in Rec. ITU-R BT.656 (SDI, Serial Digital Interface). -- pam
Any serial format but the 10-bit format, is virtually extinct.  In the early days of serial digital interfaces, reducing the datarate could significantly reduce the cost and/or increase the reliability of a link, so the lower-bitrate versions made sense.
Today, the 10-bit interface is extremely reliable, inexpensive, and ubiquitous; the other interfaces are mainly of historical interest.  (That, and there are still many concessions to the 8-bit interface in other standrds, such as SMPTE 291M).  --EngineerScotty 04:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interconnect 

message: Could somebody explain what this refers to? Adoniscik 21:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sync encoding 

message: Why is this article still called "CCIR 601" if the official name has been changed to "ITU-R BT.601"? I propose it be moved to "ITU-R BT.601" Ozhiker 14:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading incorrect? 

message: Does anyone have a chromaticity diagram showing the gamut of 601 that we can add here? I feel it is somewhat lacking when compared to the 709 article. 195.137.93.153 (talk) 09:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chromaticity 

message: Chroma_subsampling#Sampling_systems_and_ratios does not agree with what is implied by the following quote from this article:
:The color encoding system is known as YUV 4:2:2, that being the ratio of Y:Cb:Cr samples (luminance data:blue chroma data:red chroma data).
Although the numbers are the same in this example, the implication for YUV 4:2:0 is clearly false. --212.44.20.129 (talk) 16:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, clearly false, so I took it out.  Dicklyon (talk) 16:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagreement over the meaning of "YUV J:a:b" expressions 

message: Is the storage order definitely Y1:Cb:Y2:Cr? I have seen Cb:Y1:Cr:Y2 used also, but I don't have the spec in front of me so I don't know what's definitive... 212.44.20.129 (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Byte order
Talk:The Communards

message: There are several other band related articles that incorporate popular promotional images of the band in question, but I notice people keep reverting such images of The Communards out of this particular article. I find that odd. --24.47.145.73 05:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: The band name is "The Communards" as shown on the album cover RED and on my 12" Never Can Say Goodbye... and on Jimmy Somerville's website. 
I am a newbie and i do not want to mess this page as it is a big change to do.
If someone wants to do it, please do.  DeeJay Groove 15:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do a redirect then to The Communards.Tourskin 19:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected discussion 

message: The song is not a cover of Thelma Houston, as she herself covered it from Harold Melvin & the Blue Notes. Jalwikip (talk) 11:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't leave me this way 

message: lets add why they're called the communards? named most likely after the name for the Paris commune in 1871 who called themselves "les communards" a socialist uprising in france. 16:04, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  name of band 

message: The sentence: "The name Communards comes from the French term for people from a commune." is wrong for 2 reasons. The word commune in France simply refers to a municipality, not a commune in the English sense (hence wrong redirection). People who live in a commune are not called communards. The name exclusively refers to the Paris Commune (named after citizens of the commune of Paris, who took up arms). FBlanc
I have removed this and simply said that it refers to the Paris Commune instead. rogue_lettuce (talk) 12:43, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commune 

message: A bit about this was recently removed because it wasn't in the source referenced. If you want a source for it, it's in Coles' autobiography. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 07:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coles lying about having Aids
Talk:Chlamydomonadales

message: I don't get it, are they flagellates or algae? Surely they can't be both.
Apparently they really are both. see http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/103/5/1353
for an interesting paper on the effect of flagella on nutrient uptake.
In this paper, the illumination level (that supports phototrophy) is
carefully documented for the experiments. 
Pecondon 19:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Spam (food)

message: Spam no longer contains "Pork Shoulder and Ham".  The ingredients have changed, and this article must change to reflect the current reality.  The ingredients as of 04/2017 begin with "Pork with ham ..." and continue from there.  No mention of pork shoulder.  So please, let's let the article reflect this important change.  Otherwise, it is misleading. There is a HUGE difference between some random piece of "pork" - and pork shoulder.  98.194.39.86 (talk) 01:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Random pork does not mean it doesn't contain shoulder, does it? Do you have any reference for the ingredients of SPAM, in particular documentation of the ham content109.57.40.73 (talk) 09:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingredients changes 04/17 

message: Should this be moved to "Spam"? Bod (talk) 19:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , No, I think spam is appropriate as a disambiguation page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make primary topic? 

message: >By the 1990s, Spam's reputation as a low quality food led to its name being adopted for unsolicited electronic messages, especially spam email
I used to read a different story: post-WWII demand for canned food was significantly lower, especially for SPAM; so the company started to advertise SPAM as hard as possible. As result, "spamming" became a word for unavoidable, stubborn ad, rather than just an ad for something wonky. 81.89.66.133 (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spam" as in "low quality"??? I had another story (regards, Randy from ZeBush) 

message: 'Spam has long had a somewhat dubious reputation in the United States and (to a lesser degree) in the United Kingdom as a poverty food. The image of Spam as a low-cost meat product gave rise to the Scottish colloquial term "Spam valley" to describe certain affluent housing areas where residents appear to be wealthy but, in reality, may be living at poverty levels.' I don't understand why it sais to a 'lesser degree in the UK' and then quotes slang from Scotland which very strongly  hints at it being considered poverty food in the UK. This seems contradictory and is unsourced. From personal experience this is  also untrue. Spam is far more regarded as poverty food in the UK compared to the US. For example Spam is even served at some McDonald's restaurants in the US but this would never happen in the UK where Spam is seen as something from the post WW2 rationing era and not something many people would buy no matter how down on their luck they were. 2A00:23C7:5AD0:8F01:EF1B:84D0:B597:6BDE (talk) 09:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have a quality source describing the sale of spam at McDonald’s, that might be interesting to include. TurnipWatch (talk) 11:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untrue and unsourced statement 

message: “ The popularity of Spam in the Philippines transcends economic class, and the canned product is even given during holidays.”
Does it mean “given as a gift” or something else? It should be clarified. Rustygecko (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs clarification:
Talk:Lawyer

message: Overview about famous lawyers, followed by terminology and responsibilities XavierM.1978 (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add heading: Famous lawyers 

message: Hello all, 
I have some suggestions and questions for the layoff of this article. I was just wondering why "History" was so far low in the article? From all the articles I have been seeing on wikipedia, it seems the "History" section is towards the front. Therefore, my revised layout goes: 1. History 2. Terminology 3. Education 4. Responsibilities 5. Career Structure 6. Professional Ass. and regulation 7. Compensation 8. Title 9. Prejudices against lawyers. If anyone disagrees with me, I would love to hear some input or any other suggestions/ advice. Thank you for your time. Jmmonty16 (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised Layout  

message: Merge Advocate to this article because they're same profession. Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 09:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they're not, at least not in all jurisdictions. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur.  In many jurisdictions, the advocate is one of several distinct legal professions (or jurists).   --Coolcaesar (talk) 20:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from Advocate

message: I suggest having an IPA guide to show pronunciation, since the pronunciation can vary with accents. This would help non native speakers. 2600:8801:FB13:6B00:3C45:3596:BD2C:D49E (talk) 22:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:HNLMS Abraham Crijnssen (1936)

message: Can anyone tell me what were the original Dutch pre and post WWII signal letters allocated for the HMNS Abraham Crijnssen use ?
I am researching all Royal Australian Navy ships by their other lesser known identities, and that is their Signal letters, also known and used as their wireless telegraphy (W/T) callsign.  You usually can also see their identifying signal letter flags being flown when entering and leaving harbour.
The Abraham Crijnssen was commissioned into the R.A.N. 26.08.1942 until 05.05.1943 and then recommissioned back into the R.N.N. until 29.05.1961  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandypat (talk • contribs) 02:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allocated Signal letters (W/T Callsign) 
Talk:Australian Aboriginal religion and mythology

message: Is it just me, or should this just thrown into Dreamtime (mythology). All Aboriginal mythos is Dreaming isn't it.
Comments?--ZZ 07:59, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dreaming 

message: I think it is outright racist and offensive to describe indigenous cultures and beliefs as Mythology just Because it does not fit into the mould of Abrahamic doctrines like Islam and Christianity. I request you to edit the sections from Mythology to beliefs and faith. 171.61.91.7 (talk) 10:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian of indigenous origin
Talk:Jēkabpils

message: Nice start :)  but the first thing we need to know is, where is it? -- sannse 12:22 Mar 19, 2003 (UTC)
The town was created by the Russians because the Swedes sank barges to prevent Russians from getting by the river Daugava. The town of Kruspils was Polish. Therefor they offered no taxes, no draft and amnesty for all run away serfs who came there to haul freight. The old Believers came there for the work and amnesty as well. When the Duke of Courland regained the city he gave everyone in the  town the right to be called merchants and to continue what they were doing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.122.64.75 (talk) 15:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Seine

message: it be Montereau or Montereau-Fault-Yonne instead of "Monterau"?--Joanenglish (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked on satellite photos and maps - there's a lock at Montereau-Fault-Yonne, so It has to be - the rest fits too. Dickie (talk) 16:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I much prefer the previous infobox image rather than the current overcooked HDR image. Kaldari (talk) 19:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image 

message: I removed a pair of tags (pasted below) from the page that were causing a style fault in my browser, since removal fixed problem and appeared to cause none, and I could find no explanation in history or here. Nevertheless, excuse me if these are an important result of some arcane wiki-deliberations, revert if there's a consensus. I have not seen these elsewhere. Redheylin (talk) 02:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags removed 

message: Some figures look dubious to me. "The average depth of the Seine today at Paris is about eight metres": unlikely, since the Mairie de Paris reports Pont Mirabeau as having the maximum depth inside Paris (5.70 metres). Also, "The average flow of the river is very low, only a few cubic metres per second" looks wrong, too. With a speed of 0.5 m/s and a width of 140 m at Pont Mirabeau (measured on Google Maps), we get a flow rate of about 300 cubic metres per second. Sam Hocevar (talk) 11:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for physical figures? 

message: Most pictures here represent the Seine in Paris or the Paris bridges. What a lack of information for a 700 km long river ! The article has to be developped much more.Nortmannus (talk) 00:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it an article about the Seine river or about Paris ? 

message: This article demarcates the Seine as 777 km long, but the corresponding article in French marks it as 776 km. Which is more accurate? I'm  Caker18 ! I edit Wikipedia sparingly. (talk)  03:14, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: Is the  pronunciation more common the the  one? 2A01:B340:82:A8B2:68B6:445C:51E:4589 (talk) 02:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: — Assignment last updated by CaballerM (talk) 15:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: We Are What We Eat - Food, Environment, and Identity in the Atlantic World
Talk:Strouhal number

message: Is the frequency term in the Strouhal Number in "radians/second", or "cycles/second" (assuming V = m/sec and D = m)?
:Radians are a non-dimensional unit, such that cycles per second is the same thing as radians per second except that there are 2*pi (a dimensionless number) radians in each cycle.  So, the frequency is in fact in cycles per second, or if multiplied by 2*pi, radians per second.  --ABQCat 01:32, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: I note that v is used to denote velocity; I propose that V be used instead. This will maintain consistency with other articles, in which V denotes velocity, and v denotes viscosity. Any objections? Logicman1966 (talk) 12:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbols 

message: I came to this page specifically to determine whether the Strouhal number is defined in terms of 'rad/sec' or 'cycles/sec', and how it relates to 'reduced frequency', in particular for an aeroelastic application.  I found clarification for neither.  It may be that the definition is discipline/application specific, as in I had never considered counting number of blades, but it makes sense for turbines and propellers.  This article needs either a single universal definition for the terms used, or needs to be expanded to acknowledge the different ways that the number is defined in practice.  As always, anyone who uses the symbol 'St' should define what they mean by it, including in this article. </br>PoqVaUSA (talk) 18:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensions and Units 

message: The external link is down.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.35.16.225 (talk) 12:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  external link down
Talk:Acute radiation syndrome

message: In the list description of symptom types, it reads, 
It is followed by a table reporting the incidence of nausea at >30 Gy as 100%. The table also describes mild to moderate headache and short term cognitive impairment as results of a 2-6 Gy dose, which is potentially survivable. 
So altogether the actual facts seem to be clear as mud. Anyone got a good cite to clear up this contradiction?
A. J. Luxton (talk) 09:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I spent some more time on reading the sources, because I actually don't know of any single case where a human have managed to get a 30Gy dose and survived long enough to end up at a hospital bed. The first source ([3] in your quote) is in turn referencing US army medical textbooks, the CDC and FDA. They also mention dosages as high as 50Gy. The second source is a verbatim copy of a table in the merck manual on radiation poisoning. The TLDR for neurovascular effects is that that amount of radiation simply just shreds the body apart, rupturing the blood vessels (mentioned for lower dosages, but especially 30+ Gy according to these sources). I assume they figured that out from animal tests :( but it does not say  · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 16:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contradicts itself re: neurovascular symptoms 

message: ... and which I possibly had illegally in our house (PLC is illegal to use where more than a single person is living in Germany).
... I had ALL of the shown symptoms.
This PLC and also the smart meters need prohibitions as their dirty electricity is not and never properly shieldable.
We protest for a reason as adjacent to EHS people, even people with disabilities in general do not stand or like
the stricter guidelines of an illegal Wifi or even RF weaponry as both is meant to either far too quickly (strictly illegal Wifis)
or even directly (for example ELF weapons such as HAARP, even this new 5G) outright KILL a person alongside with it.
This is illegal activity to do with ones Wifi system and such a system will definitely need prohibitions as the killing of a person with a disability is strictly RACIAL DISCRIMINATION.
--2001:16B8:5786:5B00:21B2:7DF0:5099:84E8 (talk) 09:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  even overdosed RF can cause this, main culprit is a combination of smart meters and PLC 

message: In the Notable cases section, the table gives Ouchi's dose in sieverts, even though the other doses are given in grays, and the preceding text states "as ARS is measured by a whole-body absorbed dose, the exposure column only includes units of gray (Gy)." It's being sorted assuming the a 1:1 ratio of sieverts to grays, which is possible but not certain. Exobiotic 💬 ✒️ 17:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ouchi's dose units
Talk:Dr. Dre

message: The redirect Doctor Dre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 15:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Doctor Dre]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Dr Dre is a Producer FlamingknightC (talk) 18:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @FlamingknightC The article already notes that he is a record producer. —C.Fred (talk) 18:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah I mean should Producer go before rapper as he barley rap FlamingknightC (talk) 14:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 August 2023 

message: Dre Is an Businessmen FlamingknightC (talk) 19:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —Sirdog (talk) 07:55, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 August 2023 

message: Lead says: "He was the second-richest figure in hip hop as of 2018 with an estimated net worth of $800 million." Needs a . Additionally, this is not an "as of 2018" thing, but an "in 2018" thing. --2001:1C06:19CA:D600:8135:37:E1B9:753B (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: $800M
Talk:Forest

message: In the section "Societal significance", Canada, Latvia and the USA are mentioned because the topic is linked with their countries. One could also say that the content of this sections belongs in other articles. 
There is no Russian forest article, moreover, the forest as a whole is considered very important for the Russian culture, i strongly believe that it belongs here. --85.212.205.65 (talk) 16:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  @Mark Marathon 

message: Could the editor who left the  article tag give more details about what is missing? 
I see worldwide balance in the Definition, Evolutionary History, Ecology, Societal Significance, and World Size Records sections. — hike395 (talk) 16:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , you added this tag back in July. Please follow up and explain what you feel is missing. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No response after 3 months -- I will remove the tag. — hike395 (talk) 13:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize 

message: There were a number of redundant forest images that I moved from here to the gallery at Commons. — hike395 (talk) 17:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transwiki excess images to Commons