Template talk:National Register of Historic Places

message: Replaced the simple image of text with more attractive graphic logo (IMHO) that appears on the title page of the "official site". Could not find the text image at the NRHP. —dogears (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: dm 14:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thank you for fixing the whitespace issue

message: Could someone change the name parameter to "National Register of Historic Places," so all the vde links don't have to redirect from Template:Registered Historic Places to here? Thanks! --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 23:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 03:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected name

message: For WP:ACCESSIBILITY by visually impaired readers, the purely decorative image that this template generates should have "link=" instead of alt text, as per WP:ALT #Purely decorative images. To do this, please install . Thanks. Eubulides (talk) 01:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 16:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Accessibility improvement

message: Since the previous comment the Mediawiki software has been changed to also require  to mark the image as being purely decorative. Please also install the obvious . Thanks. Eubulides (talk) 20:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Accessibility update

message: National Park Service should be National Park Service. I do not see why this links to something other than what it says. Many of the areas on the list are not on the NRHP so that link is irrelevant. Thanks, Reywas92Talk 19:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Longfellow National Historic Site got renamed to Longfellow House-Washington’s Headquarters National Historic Site on dec 22, 2010. Please change the link. TIA --h-stt !? 21:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ...What does that have to do with this template?--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 00:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Please merge with . Essentially all this entails is just to copy the contents of "NRHP by state-region" and replace the contents here with it (I've done the actually merging there, as it was not protected). You can also replace the contents of "NRHP by state-region" with a redirect if you wish, but I can do that once it's been copied over. Thanks,  ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 16:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but given the consensus in the icon discussion above, I would first remove the image of the plaque in . --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed, though, with the substanial alteration of the template, I wonder if the issue may need to be looked at again. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 17:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough.  You may be right.  I just didn't think a merge should be undertaken with that image, so shortly after the icon discussion. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be fine, now, without an image. Should it be discussed again and the consensus changes, the image could be added then. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 20:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please make sure that the appropriately filled out  template is on the talkpages of both pages. Thanks. Woody (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, have added the Copied templates. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 23:41, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge  

message: "Morocco" is the last entry in this Template (National Register of Historic Places), which concerns only the United States and its territories. "Morocco" ought to be removed, as it is not relevant to this topic. Thank you.
71.20.8.226 (talk) 04:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the American Legation, Tangier is the only property in a foreign country listed on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places, thus, Morocco actually belongs :-) --IvoShandor (talk) 04:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's technically correct, but is there really a need to link to a single historic property in a template that's transcluded in more than 20,000 articles? All of the other linked state/territory/etc. articles are lists. - Eureka Lott 02:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 71.20.8.226, 17 June 2011 

message: The group 3 heading should be "Lists [plural] by territories" to match the others, no? Deor (talk) 12:32, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Yet another edit request

message: Hi. The District of Columbia is included as a "territory" under this template, even though it is not. If this template is going to distinguish between "states", "territories", and "associated states", then D.C. should be categorized correctly as the "federal district", "states and federal district", or (hopefully not) "other". Best, epicAdam(talk) 05:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically, Puerto Rico is a commonwealth and not a territory, so that's wrong too. A header "Territories, commonwealths, and districts" is way too long though. Perhaps the three bottom rows (territories, associated states, and other) can be combined into a single "other areas" header?--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 19:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Puerto Rico is a territory in all but name only. It's still governed under Article 4 of the United States Constitution; the same as all other U.S. territories. The freely associated states are their own sovereign nations. I'd suggest making the categories "States and Federal District", "Territories", and "Other". Best, epicAdam(talk) 19:37, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  DC is not a territory 

message: The "below" section only needs to read Category and Portal, with their respective icons.
That is more the standard these days, and less verbose.
Varlaam (talk) 05:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes,  and  would be better. Varlaam (talk) 04:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request, March 2012 

message: Please update this template to the sandbox version. It fixes the bodyclass, verbosity in the "below" parameter (and adds the WikiProject), alphabetizes the Topics section, and corrects the sections according to the Political divisions of the United States. Thanks --Funandtrvl (talk) 23:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, please note that you don't need to add leading colons to Portal or Wikipedia links such as Portal WikiProject. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, OK!! Thanks much! --Funandtrvl (talk) 20:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 07April12 

message: Please remove the link to the Wikiproject in the "below" section.  We should not be linking to the project from mainspace per WP:SELFREF.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Cabayi (talk) 11:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request April 2017 

message: In the title of the template, it the abbreviation of "Unites States" should be written as "US" according to Wikipedia:Manual of Style.83.228.159.212 (talk) 17:15, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request July 2018 

message: Add links to :category:National Register of Historic Places, commons:category:National Register of Historic Places, and change the wording for the link to the portal. See proposed changes in Template:National Register of Historic Places/sandbox. —Eli355 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly done: Added the category link. The commons link does not conform to WP:NAVBOX and WP:NAV so I have not added that. Izno (talk) 14:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

text: As a note, I note that the category link was removed 2 years ago. I have no preference on whether that should have been removed (or added), but the request is reasonable (after the fact) and the removal reason is not all that great. Maybe  will have an opinion separate. --Izno (talk) 14:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not have a strong opinion on this but thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 30 October 2018 

message: Make the links to the category and portal on the bottom bold, by adding |belowstyle= font-weight:bold; —Eli355 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Izno (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks —Eli355 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 2 November 2018 

message: The template has a grammatically incorrect line; line labeling registry locations by state should read "...by state", not "...by states". Tyrekecorrea (talk) 17:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 20:11, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 4 January 2019 

message: Request that a 'Related' section be added to the bottom of the template, with two entries (a main entry and a subsection): 
* National Historic Preservation Act of 1966
**Historic Preservation Fund
Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Does Template:National Register of Historic Places/sandbox look like what you want? If not, please adjust it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks . Have moved 'Historic Preservation Fund' to subsection of the Preservation Act (created as part of the act and also relevant to the template topic). Randy Kryn (talk) 10:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

text: Done – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:26, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 28 October 2019 

message: This template currently has a "List of U.S. National Historic Landmarks by state"... Click on them & you find lists of NRHPs. But a NHL is NOT the same as an entry on the NRHPs (National Register of Historic Places). This obvious error should be corrected immediately. 216.164.62.52 (talk) 12:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 30 October 2021 

message: include:
*National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
*name    (Uptown Tenderloin Historic District, San Francisco, California)
*number  (8001407) 
*http://pdfhost.focus.nps.gov/docs/nrhp/photos/8001407.PDF NRHP Images (pdf)
*http://pdfhost.focus.nps.gov/docs/nrhp/text/8001407.PDF NHRP Registration Form (pdf)
:.... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved this from VPR. Disucssions about improving single pages, such as this one, rarely need to go to WP:VPR. — xaosflux Talk 13:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''National Register of Historic Places'' Template  request 

message: Change the text "Morocco" to "American Legation, Tangier, Morocco". The current wording makes it look like a list of multiple listings. Partofthemachine (talk) 02:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to "American Legation, Morocco", since "American Legation, Tangier, Morocco" makes no sense as Tangier is a city in Morocco Terasail[✉️] 15:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 4 December 2022 

message: For the following section of the navbox:
 
|group6 = Related
|list6  = 
* National Historic Preservation Act of 1966
**Historic Preservation Fund
The "of 1966" needs to be removed to fix a redirect as the page was just moved. – The Grid (talk)  23:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 1 January 2023