lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:McGavock Confederate Cemetery

message: As much as such a statement is bound to be shown to be incorrect eventually, since all it takes is one example to make it false, this statement jumped out at me from a recent article in the Tennesseean.  Knoxville's Bethel Confederate Cemetery contains the remains of over 1,600 Confederate dead.  Thinking that the conflict may be due to actual geographical size, a search led me here.  By this consideration, McGavock also falls short - Bethel Cemetery property encompasses 2.4 acres.  Neither is Bethel a public cemetery.  Founded by the Knoxville Ladies Memorial Association, ownership of the cemetery passed to Miss Mamie Winstead in the mid-1950s.  Since her death in 1989, the cemetery has been under the care of the Hazen Historical Museum Foundation.
Curiously, it has never occurred to any of us on the cemetery board that we may actually be the "largest privately held Confederate Cemetery in the United States" - 1,600 graves and 2.4 acres just never felt that big, comparatively.  This warrants a little more research.  In any case, since the statement as applied to McGavock Cemetery is incorrect, I'm removing it from the lede. Archarin (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've discovered that the major problem with this superlative is deciding what qualifies in the first place as "privately held."  I can't see a distinction between Battle of Franklin Trust (or whatever the particular managing non-profit is) qualifying as "privately held" and Hazen Historical Museum Foundation qualifying as "privately held."  But what else qualifies under the same standard?  In some amount of digging, I've found, for example, Stonewall Confederate Cemetery in Winchester, Virginia, which contains the remains of 2,575 Confederate soldiers, and which is owned and managed by the Board of Managers of the Mount Hebron Cemetery (adjoining it), chartered in 1844.  It's larger by any standard of measure.  Any such claim by McGavock Cemetery would have to be based on some other interpretive definition, or arbitrary narrowing of the criteria.  Archarin (talk) 03:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Largest privately held Confederate Cemetery in the United States"
Talk:Incentive theory

message: can someone please add some more details on this article. I have an essay due on the 11th of november and i'm doing my research on this theory...please
yours faithfully 
mukovhe
:Hmm, I must first warn from using Wikipedia as a source for research, otherwise than as a starting point for finding primary sources on the web. We're doing our best here on WP, but we're a bunch of amateurs that sometimes have a shallow insight in science and reality. Secondly, the incentive theory within psychology is not more than 15 years old or less, there's not much to be found yet. Said: Rursus ☻ 10:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm considering a split into "Incentive theory (organization)", and  "Incentive theory (psychology)", since the theories seems to be unrelated - as far as I can see now. However, I don't know yet - they may actually be the same genre - it would be logical if they were. Said: Rursus ☻ 10:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided a split might be relevant, since the theories, however connected, regards organization structures from a non-motivation stand point on the organizational side, and motivations connected to drive and beliefs on the psychological side. What might be relevant as an alternative to a split, would be to integrate the sparse material into other articles, and here have just one disambiguation page. Opinions? Said: Rursus ☻ 10:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Split done. SilkTork *YES! 19:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:James Peregrine Lester

message: Lester did not appear in Episodes 5 and 9, and therefore his episode count should be 11, not 13.--Ac02111993 (talk) 22:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode Count
Talk:Tron (video game)

message: Some quick remarks, then:
*The description section needs some restructuring. For a subsection to be created, one needs at least two full paragraphs, instead of one half each. Perhaps do not have any subsections at all for the four different subgames, but use a list format like Supreme Commander#Factions does for example.
*The in popular culture section should limit itself to non-trivial references to the game. The only thing passing that test would be the Kingdom Hearts thing - perhaps include that in the legacy section, and delete the popular culture one.
*Development and reception are obvious stubs, which are hard to expand upon. If sources for those were found, this article would be a strong candidate for FA. Perhaps some old magazines from Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Magazines? User:Krator (t c) 14:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:VG]] Assessment 

message: I could have sworn that Tron was the first movie to ever have a game based on it. Or was it the first movie to have video games in it? I can't recall, but I may be wrong. I'll have to check that out, anyone have a good site for historical information (Dates, sales, criticism, and facts) on video games? 
I just KNOW someone is going to link me back here, but there has to be an IMDB of video games. IVGDB? If it hasn't been done already, patent pending! Ha called it. Vicious203 15:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Licensing in Video Games 

message: Does anyone know if there are any coin op games for the new movie "Tron Legacy" in development?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cousert (talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I know I am seriously late to this party, but the only game based on Tron Legacy that I'm aware of is a pinball game of the same name, by Stern Electronics. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 17:56, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tron Legacy (2010)
Talk:List of presidents of the institutions of the European Union

message: bettino craxi was from pse, it should be corrected --SquallLeonhart_ITA (talk) 17:50, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

message: Position                                                                      	1 Jan 2012-30 June 2014	1 July 2014-30 Dec 2016	1 Jan 2017-30 June 2019	1 July 2019-30 Dec 2021
Executive  	President of the European Commission (equal president)  5 years               	A                      	A                      	B                      	B
Legislature	President of the European Council (equal congress)  2,5 years                 	C                      	D                      	E                      	F
Legislature	President of the European Parliament (equal senate)  2,5 years                	G                      	H                      	I                      	J
Legislature	Presidency of the Council of the European Union (equal representative)  1 year	K/L/M                  	M/N/O                  	P/Q/R                  	R/S/T
Judicial   	President of the European Court of Justice (equal supreme court)  5 years     	U                      	U                      	V                      	V
114.79.50.237 (talk) 02:44, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  example head of legislature, executive and judicial 
Talk:President of the European Union

message: Herman Van Rompuy became the president of the EU today, 19th November 2009.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.175.146 (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: he became President of the European Council not president of the European Union as that is still a throretical post (i.e. no plans to make a role a reality). Pro66 (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The First President Announced

message: It has never been used, however informally, as an informal term for the post of President of the European Commission.
:I'm pretty sure it has been informally used for the post of President of the European Commission.  This is obviously informal, and probably incorrect, but it seems to be done on occasion. john k (talk) 20:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite right, it has been changed since I wrote this and I didn't keep an eye on it. The person who changed it has made a bit of a personal statement there that is far too broad.- J.Logan`t: 14:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  President of the Commission 

message: The article as it stood was misleading speculation on a possibility that will not happen in accordance with any existing treaty.  There is no planned treaty in which it might exist.  WP:Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.
Furthermore, in accordance with the disambiguation MOS, there should be no more text than is neccessary to help readers determine which of the possible interpretations is the one they want.  Accordingly, I have deleted most of the article since it was either repetition or speculation. --Red King (talk) 18:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reduced to a disambig. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. 

message: Shouldn't this disambiguation page clarify that only for one of these options, news reports sometimes use the simpler (and incorrect) term President of the EU - and that is the President of the European Council. I think, it is good to have the other options as well, since obviously the multitude of organizations and presidents confuses our readers. But still, there is only this one misnomer that really occurs frequently in published writings. 09:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose we could recognise that the article is about the error, so it is not a true disambig.  But it has to be much simpler than it was.  It certainly must not go into theoretical futures and technical possibilities that will never be realised. --Red King (talk) 12:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colloquial use only for President of the European Council 
Talk:Roosevelt Jamison

message: : I would have added an infobox but I can't find anywhere that mentions a birth date. Sue Wallace 20:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK someone has kindly added a DOB, is it possible someone would have an image of him to add the article too? Sue Wallace (talk) 01:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Jewish Bolshevism

message: *Anti-Komintern
*History of the Jews in Russia and Soviet Union
*Communist Party of the Soviet Union
*Bolshevik
*Yevsektsiya
*History of antisemitism
*Komzet
**OZET
*Red Latvian Riflemen
*Jewish Autonomous Oblast
**Birobidzhan
*Jewish Communist Party (Poalei Zion)
*Jewish Communist Union (Poalei Zion)
*Jewish left
:I think only Bolshevism is relevant to our article on this pamphlet, the rest should be deleted. --Ludvikus (talk) 17:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: ЦК партии, из 22 членов: евреев - 17, русских – 3 (?), армян - 1, грузин – 1 
Военный комиссариат, из 43 членов: евреев - 35, латышей - 7, немцев -1. 
Комиссариат внутренних дел и ЧК, из 62 членов: евреев 43, русских 2, латышей 10. 
Комиссариат иностранных дел, из 16 членов: евреев - 13; латышей - 1; немцев -1; русских - 1. 
Комиссариат финансов, из 29 человек: евреев - 24; латышей - 2; русских - 2; поляков - 1. 
Комиссариат юстиции, из 19 членов: евреев - 18, армянин – 1. 
Комиссариат народного просвещения, из 9 членов: евреев -8, русский – 1
http://likbezxxi.narod.ru/vc/pril2.htm
217.77.96.3 (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percentage in Russian
Talk:S-IVB

message: The page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-IVB lists the Apollo 9 S-IVB as having gone into solar orbit. How is this possible given that the Apollo 9 mission did not leave Earth orbit?
Colinmc151 15:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After the spacecraft left the S-IVB, it was commanded to thrust out of Earth orbit. Andy120290 19:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The table shows several S-IVBs launched atop Saturn IBs into earth orbit as now being in heliocentric orbit. As far as I know, they all expended their propellant reaching earth orbit, from which they eventually decayed. Does anyone have different information? Karn (talk) 06:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fate of Saturn IB S-IVBs? 

message: This sentence in the article, seems to imply that the empty S-IVB was used as a hull for skylab.
"An S-IVB provided the hull for Skylab, the United States' first space station."
That was not the case. Can someone clarify it?178.72.48.121 (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement was essentially correct, but has been clarified. JustinTime55 (talk) 13:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wet workshop ambiguity? 

message: Were they TRW TR-204 ? ... Rocket Engine, TR-204, Liquid Fuel, Saturn V Third Stage Auxiliary Propulsion System (APS) spaceaholic says so, but it would be nice to find and use a NASA or TRW ref. - Rod57 (talk) 11:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  APS thrusters - TR-204 ? 

message: There's a conflict between the tabulated empty/dry mass of 29,700 lbm and the value cited in the Description, 22,000 lbm. The former is a much more credible mass fraction (88% vice 95%). The 22,000 lbm value does not appear to be substantiated by the cited references; the latter says 23,000 lbm, not 22,000. Demostheneez (talk) 20:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dry Mass? 

message: The first parentheses on the successes is missing Sp epic (talk) 00:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing parentheses
Talk:Dzyatlava massacre

message: Hi, 
regarding this article, I found a newspaper article about the former soldier Vassili Arula, from the 36th battalion, responding to the allegations by Efraim Zuroff. 
According to him, the ones who shot the detainees were germans and 'poles in black uniforms'.
And in the august of 1942 in Novogrudok, their job was to guard the horse stables with prisoners, and there might have been jews. Why they were there or why they were prisoners, he cant say.
His story is confirmed by the history of the 36th police battalion, from the National Archive in Tallinn. According to this they reached Novogrudok on 5th or 6th of August, after which they got a few days off. Then they were ordered to fight against partisans, leaving the base with cars and then always coming back. There isnt anything mentioned about escorting or killing jews in the battalion history, written by their leader Harald Riipalu.
Then come the NKVD interrogations. Its known about one of the witnesses, Rudolf Mäeorg that NKVD got everything out of him at gunpoint - and it later turned out that he didnt even serve in the 36th police battalion. 
the article in estonian is here: http://www.epl.ee/artikkel/211338
oh yeah and the interrogation in russian, which somebody cited as one of the sources, Mäeorg's "confession" is included in it: http://www.vpk-news.ru/article.asp?pr_sign=archive.2006.145.articles.history_01
Terehommikust 15:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: does not mention either Dzyatlava or Dzyatlava massacre or Djatlovo. Nor does google books have anything on it, either does google scholar. Please provide a proper and reliable source for the article. Thanks!--Termer 09:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedia of the Holocaust By Israel Gutman 

message: The article currently leaves the impression that this battalion single-handedly carried out the massacre whereas the opposite is true - the KGB, despite their efforts, did not find any evidence against them. Let me point out that the 36 Battalion was an SS-unit like the other ones there, wherefore  the statement "The German SS soldiers and the Schutzmannschaft Front Battalion 36 Arensburg" sounds as stupid as "animals and cows" or "people and Jews". Dzied Bulbash's removal of historical sources is inappropriate and so is inserting Russian government propagandist Natalya Voyakina. I also do not understand why was the original title of the external source Eestlased võisid osaleda Valgevene massimõrvas [Estonians  may have participated in a Belorussian mass murder] replaced with an OR title and why was the Novogrudoki tõed ja valed [Thruths and lies of Novogrudok] removed? --Jaan Pärn (talk) 08:26, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schutzmannschaft Front Battalion 36 Arensburg
Talk:Milnot

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nom.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 15:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Template talk:2008 United States elections

message: I've removed the individual districts since I feel this precedent would add significantly to the size of the template, which is already quite large.  I think it would be best to just leave the main article for each state linked here, and have the links for individual district elections inside of the state's election articles. --Tom (talk - email) 15:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are still some random House races that have their own billing here. Special elections I understand, but TX-22 and VA-07 receiving top-level billing as well? What makes these races more notable than the others? Qqqqqq (talk) 06:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Listing individual districts

message: Would it be appropriate and useful to add a section for the 2008 Presidential elections?  Maybe basic links to the main article about the election, as well as the articles about the two major party primary processes?  Chadlupkes 03:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidential?
Talk:Truppenführung

message: In addition to wikification, this article needs some further cleanup to meet Wikipedia standards. German-style abbreviations like v.Moltke for von Moltke need to be Anglicized. The copyright notices need to be cleaned out (such brief quotes are fair use; and it looks like advertisement right now) and replaced with proper citations. --Orange Mike 13:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, German Umlauts need to be added (it's "Truppenführung", not "Truppenfuhrung"). I also seriously doubt they used CamelCase ("AuftragTaktik"); the proper German word would be "Auftragstaktik", or possibly "Auftrag-Taktik", or "Auftrags-Taktik". For the benefit of screen readers, non-English words should be wrapped in language templates, for instance "" which yields  marked up in a way such that a screen reader can switch to proper German pronunciation. Lupo 08:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Auftragstaktik" or "Auftrags-Taktik" Paradoctor (talk) 14:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

text:  The official German military vocabulary lists the term as 'AuftragsTaktik'.  There is no exact equivalent word, or expression, in English and the United States and British General Staffs have agreed on the terms as listed in the article.Miletus (talk) 20:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If there is an official vocabulary, please cite it. I'm a native speaker, and German used to use camelcase in abbreviations only. Currently, the "official" expression seems to be Führen mit Auftrag.[2] Paradoctor (talk) 14:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

text:  There is a wikipage on Auftragstaktik which provides more information which may be helpful.Miletus (talk) 17:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: This is raider1210 - not sure where I should add this comment, but in this article is stated that Ludwig Beck was executed but on Ludwig Beck articke it is stated that he was forced to commit suicide.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raider1210 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Reference the death of Ludwig Beck:  The latest information is in the new biography of v.Manstein (by Major General Melvin, published in May 2010).  His research, in the German archives, has shown that Beck tried twice to shoot himself in the head but bungled the job and was finished off by a sergeant.  So my entry written above is corrected.Miletus (talk) 08:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

text: When in doubt, comment on both talkpages. You can fix this yourself: Try to find a reliable source, then correct the articles accordingly. If you run into problems, drop me a line on my talkpage. BTW, please sign your messages with ~~~~, this will automatically insert your signature. Regards, Paradoctor (talk) 14:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Ludwig Beck 

message: This book was 'punningly referred to as "Tante Frieda"', referring to the novel by Ludwig Thoma, according to the Osprey book cited. It is referred to by this name in Jim Dunnigan's "How To Make War (4th edition)".
Roches (talk) 18:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tante Frieda or Tante Freide
Talk:Ratko Delorko

message: Ratko Delorko is a famous German pianist and composer. He gives concerts all around the world. In 2007 he already has given master-classes and concerts in Malaysia, USA, Italia, Romania, Russia. Even if not everybody knows his name, he should be mentioned in Wikipedia. This is what an encylopedia is designed for. If every reader allready knew what is written there, it would be obsolete.
www.google.de shows 16500 links for Ratko Delorko.
Best regdards:
Detlev WulfWulfmusic 15:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great!  With all those links, it should be easy for you to choose a few that are reliable sources to verify that this person meets the notability guidelines, and add those sources to the article!  Remember, the German Wikipedia doesn't count as a reliable source- try newspapers and music journals. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Jean-Michel Jarre compositions with multiple titles

message: As the editor who started this article (as a summary from a thread in a web forum), I'd like to point to the editor who has recently been deleting entries because old and new titles do not refer to "the same track", that she may have failed to notice that:
:a) those entries were marked with a *;
:b) "Titles followed by a * denote a derivative composition using the same main melody, not just a retitling." (from the intro text).
I tried to register in the forum mentioned in one of the edit summaries but have still to be confirmed by its admin. As I cannot intervene there, I'm leaving this note here. Please either reinstate the deleted entries (if they are indeed derivative compositions), or repurpose the article and remove the entries marked with a *. Thank you.--maf (talk-cont) 01:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be better to have 2 lists, maybe in this same page, one listing compositions which has been renamed sometime, and one listing derivative compositions. Equinoxe 06:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good, simple solution. To do. --maf (talk-cont) 17:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent deletions

message: Oxygen in Moscow is NOT Oxygene 12 from Odyssey, they are different tracks, but this still might be a remix of Oxygene 12, will compare it later.
SF 83.13.239.255 (talk) 11:35, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxygen in Moscow 

message: The album Chronologie has been re-issued this year (2015) and named Chronology for the first time. I guess this should be added to this list.Oxygene7-13 (talk) 13:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronologie / Chronology
Talk:Nate Dogg discography

message: Exactly how is the The Prodical Son from 2000 a compilation album? When I click it, it only goes his first albums second cd, which is from 1998. Some explanation would be required in either article. 85.217.46.119 (talk) 02:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)