Talk:Speedyclick.com

message: I want you to stop the tracking cookies. I am a member of speedyclick and I resent your invasion of my privacy.
littlelady1@msn.com
::I'm confused on a number of levels by your remark. The speedyclick website, although it may have tracked cookies at one point, has been defunct for at least five years. Also, the editors of this wikipedia article did not necessarily have anything to do with the running of said website. Kevinmooney 05:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrary section header 

message: The article seems to have a strong anti-spam point of view. I don't like spam myself, but to me it's part of the price we pay for freedom of speech.  Here are a couple of expressions from the article:
:"...they have further exploited lax spam regulations" and "...current hard-core and unrepentant spammers"
That doesn't sound very neutral to me. Steve Dufour 00:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not POV, reliably sourced 

message: *This subsection will be to discuss the reliability or lack thereof of Spamhaus as a cited source.  Smee 00:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many more sources if required, however I think the above should satisfy the criteria.  Orsini 02:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

text: 3O As the subject of email, spam and Spamhaus is directly in line with my profession, I am very familiar with the subject of Spamhaus as it relates to the email and spam industry. It is the general opinion of the industry that Steve Linford (and spamhaus) is an expert in the field of spam and email and would be considered a reliable source. There are many people and organizations that contest entries in the Spamhaus project, but that does not change its acceptance as a reliable source. Lsi john 01:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  As I had already left this on WP:3O, what the hey, it will be interesting to hear more comments.  Smee 01:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually thats where I saw it. I was not sure how to mark it answered and was about to ask you. Note that my personal opinion of Spamhaus is vastly different than my 3O here, but my POV was not requested and thus not given. Lsi john 01:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh.  Well in that case, thank you again.  You can simply remove the entry itself that I had initially put at WP:3O, and include in your edit summary something like:  Removed Speedyclick.com, third opinion given, The Spamhaus Project as reliable source.  FIVE Remain..  Thanks again for your help, and polite demeanor on this issue.  Smee 01:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do bear in mind that listings at Spamhaus change frequently. What is listed one way today, may be removed or listed differently tomorrow. Though the odds that if someone has been listed as a ROKSO spammer that their entry will not be easily changed. Lsi john 01:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the clarification, and thanks again for your time.  Smee 01:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Beat me to the third opinion; I completely agree. FYI, Smee, you might want to  convert the reference to use the  template, which even more clearly indicates that the information was accessed on the particular date, and review What to do when a reference link "goes dead" if this seems likely. According to the ROKSO FAQ, if the ROKSO record is not updated for 6 months the information will no longer be publicly accessible from the Spamhaus site. Anomie 02:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, for the suggestions, they will definitely be taken into consideration.  Yours, Smee 02:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Spamhaus Project]] as reliable source. 

message: *This will be a subsection for comment from a neutral editor coming from WP:3O, regarding the usage of The Spamhaus Project as a reliable source for citations within this article.  Smee 01:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 3O As the subject of email, spam and Spamhaus is directly in line with my profession, I am very familiar with the subject of Spamhaus as it relates to the email and spam industry. It is the general opinion of the industry that Steve Linford (and spamhaus) is an expert in the field of spam and email and would be considered a reliable source. There are many people and organizations that contest entries in the Spamhaus project, but that does not change its acceptance as a reliable source. Lsi john 01:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  As I had already left this on WP:3O, what the hey, it will be interesting to hear more comments.  Smee 01:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually thats where I saw it. I was not sure how to mark it answered and was about to ask you. Note that my personal opinion of Spamhaus is vastly different than my 3O here, but my POV was not requested and thus not given. Lsi john 01:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh.  Well in that case, thank you again.  You can simply remove the entry itself that I had initially put at WP:3O, and include in your edit summary something like:  Removed Speedyclick.com, third opinion given, The Spamhaus Project as reliable source.  FIVE Remain..  Thanks again for your help, and polite demeanor on this issue.  Smee 01:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do bear in mind that listings at Spamhaus change frequently. What is listed one way today, may be removed or listed differently tomorrow. Though the odds that if someone has been listed as a ROKSO spammer that their entry will not be easily changed. Lsi john 01:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the clarification, and thanks again for your time.  Smee 01:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Beat me to the third opinion; I completely agree. FYI, Smee, you might want to  convert the reference to use the  template, which even more clearly indicates that the information was accessed on the particular date, and review What to do when a reference link "goes dead" if this seems likely. According to the ROKSO FAQ, if the ROKSO record is not updated for 6 months the information will no longer be publicly accessible from the Spamhaus site. Anomie 02:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, for the suggestions, they will definitely be taken into consideration.  Yours, Smee 02:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Opinion on [[The Spamhaus Project]] as reliable source. 

message: Cirt, I'm curious about the reason for the deletion of the material that came with sources (I understand about removal of unsourced material).  It seemed relevant  -- so why delete it?  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions 

message: These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.
*13 citations, no images.  Article could use some images, and expansion of (both) subsections with more citations...  Smee 01:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Speedyclick.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050329225336/http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HDN/is_1999_Nov_11/ai_57537852 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HDN/is_1999_Nov_11/ai_57537852
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Speedyclick.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901134056/http://securities.stanford.edu/1018/NWKC01/index.html to http://securities.stanford.edu/1018/NWKC01/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified