Template talk:Agriculture

message: Hi, could we move this template to Template:Agriculture?  There is no "farming" article, farming redirects to agriculture.  It's better for consistency and clarity if we match the names of things as per article names, category names (:Category:Agriculture), and template names.  Kurieeto 16:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. WAS 4.250 17:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed.  Jav43 15:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As the change is unopposed after a week, I've gone and moved the template. Kurieeto 22:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template move to "Agriculture" 

message: While on the one hand I disagree with this edit; on the other hand, it would make sense to figure out which articles are best put on the template, which on the list, and which on the portal. Further, I think the list should be on the template but maybe being on the portal would be enough. WAS 4.250 02:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Portal, list, template

message: For the love of God, someone shrink it. Hesperian 04:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This box is way, way, way too big

message: I wonder if the article heirloom plant should be added to the 'particular' section, and/or if the template should be added to the article? Right now, the heirloom plant seems to focus on private growers, but it is a growing commercial agriculture sector. Anchoress 22:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition 

message: This should be deprecated in favor of simply a link to the Portal:Agropedia, it is far too large.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 04:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's get rid of this altogether 

message: Due to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Agriculture, I am creating Template talk:Agriculture/workspace for all interested people to work on re-creating this template as a navigation footer template and several topic specific top of the page navigation templates. WAS 4.250 22:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with this solution.  Note that Sustainable Development's template was recently portalized by TfD for getting too big.  Although I have advocated such a solution to this one previously, I see the value in a substantially reduced footer style template.  Based on the TfD, we've got to make this less obtrusive or risk it being killed by others.  Thanks.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template talk:Agriculture/workspace 

message: VanTucky at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Agriculture says:
:I was recently working on sheep, and I found that the farming template was too large to keep in the article and still have the amount of images I wanted. Seriously, it's a big template. Would anyone be opposed to adding a hide/show function like the Buddhism template? It would make me more inclined to add it. VanTucky talk 04:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for template change 

message: I have changed the looks slightly and made the template narrower. The content remains the same.--SasiSasi (talk) 00:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For the image, I'm proposing to change it to :file:Farming-on-Indonesia.jpg (from :File:Rice Field2.jpg), since the latter is tagged with . Bennylin (talk) 10:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I like the current image better, since it's not as closely tied to a single current civilisation.  if we do go with a new one, we should absolutely not use 'thumb' to create an artificial frame around it.  thank you. Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the look 

message: The Agriculture footer seems sufficient for the job of navigation. We don't need a sidebox as well to do the same job. The obvious problem, apart from the prodigal consumption of screen space, is the fact that articles often relate to multiple topic areas. While multiple footers are fine, multiple sideboxes are not. Perhaps it's time for the sidebox to go. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication