lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:HMS Indefatigable (R10)

message: Built at the famous John Brown yard on Clydeside, HMS Indefatigable was commissioned around September 1943. The first captain was Captain Q D Graham.
The first mission (rather in the form of a 'working-up' exercise) was a set of raids on the Tirpitz. It was not a spectacular success with all sorts of equipment problems showing up.
The ship's squadrons operated a number of aicraft types including the Supermarine Seafire and Fairey Firefly.
After dockyard work on the problems the ship sailed on November 19th 1944 for the Far east to join the British Pacific Fleet as flagship of Rear-Admiral Philip Vian (Vian of HMS Cossack) who commanded the carrier group of the BPF. He transferred his flag to HMS Indomitable on arrival at Colombo on 10th December 1944.
On 1st April 1945 while operating in support of the Okinawa expedition, the ship was hit at the base of the superstructure by a Kamikaze suicide bomber. The ship was unable to operate aircraft for about 5 hours.
my great uncle served on her during world war 2 and during the kamikaze attack had to jump from his station into the netting around the ship. hes got quite a few stories too do with the ship.Corustar
:That's great!  Maybe you should get him to add some to this article.  --Alphachimp talk 15:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have read through many sources, Peillard, Sink the Tirpitz, Sturtivant, Mccart, Brown 1968, Harrison (Fairey Barracuda) including the admiralty war diaries. No luftwaffe opposition was encounterd during Goodwood. Brown 1968 discussing Goodwood: " No enemy air opposition was encountered during the strikes on Tirpitz..." Thomas, Royal Navy Aces p.66-67 details fighter operations during Goodwood and again, there is no mention of Luftwaffe fighters.  NO aerial combat between Luftwaffe fighters and FAA aircraft occurred during Goodwood. Your source is completely inaccurate and should be removed ASAP.Damwiki1 (talk) 18:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Added additional web source, Asmussen - no luftwaffe opposition, and G&D, 267-268, who state 11 FAA losses total from all raids, no Luftwaffe opposition. Sturivant, British Naval Aviation, p109 again no luftwaffe opposition.Damwiki1 (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Conceded, see your talk page for a lengthy response on that issue and others.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goodwood 

message: I've uploaded a photo of Indefatigable. --Merbabu (talk) 08:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  new photo
Talk:Spin–statistics theorem

message: Would be nice to know what Microcausality is.  The Wiki article Causality_(physics) does NOT even mention Microcausality.  Have removed the useless link. Jamesdowallen (talk) 13:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microcausality 

message: Unlike the original comment on this talk page, I don't see a problem with discussing incorrect theories or ideas which have been disproven. But bogus is a pejorative and inflammatory term, which should not be used in an encyclopedia. I'd like to change that to incorrect or some other less biased word. If I don't see anyone objecting in the next few weeks, I'll make that change. Fcrary (talk) 01:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I intend to delete the entire "General discussion" section as WP:OR.The two references are not related to the argument.  It's blog post material not encyclopedic. Johnjbarton (talk) 23:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the "bogus proof" (again) 

message: I'm most of the way through this book. Advanced to be sure, as you nee know some QM and classical mechanics, but covers everything after than.
* Pauli and the Spin-Statistics Theorem https://doi-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1142/3457 | March 1998 Pages: 524 By (author): Ian Duck (Rice University, Texas, Houston, USA) and E C G Sudarshan (University of Texas at Austin, USA)
Johnjbarton (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excellent comprehensive reference 

message: I plan to delete section now called "Schwinger's Proof"
* The single ref lists the primary source and a comment that the proof has been changed (WP:OR?)
* The text refers to content elsewhere that no longer seems to exist (some kind of QFT intro?)
* The text has two lists, a list of pre-conditions and what seems to be commentary on the first list in the form of a similarly numbered list. This is unclear.
* The text refs to proofs (Chern–Simons theory) and physics (quarks, QCD) not known at the time of Schwinger's proof.
* No secondary ref.
* The Duck Sudarshan book discusses the Schwinger proof as historically notable but not the most rigorous, complete, or intuitive. The description here is not historical.
* QFT texts don't normally give this proof AFAIK.
Johnjbarton (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schwinger's Proof
Talk:Serenity

message: where is the ISS module of the same name (alter named tranquility)? it is referenced by wikipedia itself, but the link only leads to the disambig page.  06:50, 26 August 2009‎ 
84.137.12.131
:NASA renamed module Node 3 with the name Tranquility, although Serenity had been leading earlier in the voting. WurmWoodeT 17:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: ISS
Talk:If You're Feeling Sinister

message: Per this discussion, Acclaimed Music is not a reliable source, and should not be used as a ref. in this article. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 17:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  acclaimedmusic.net 

message: Should be a description of the themes or sound of the album. So many stats on how it's important, but nothing about how or why.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.32.173 (talk) 06:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing here
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Missouri

message: We have to put in party designations.  Color-blind readers can't necessarily see them.  See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Formatting issues.  Color can be left in, but we need to have also the (D) and (R) for the parties.—Mark Adler (markles) 20:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors
Talk:HMS Implacable (R86)

message: My great-uncle, who served on the Implacable at the time, says that the crew did bomb Norwegian installations, but that there was no indication that any ship was sunk.  He says that perhaps censorship kept the information from getting out, but I see that the information is unsourced, so perhaps the Implacable didn't actually sink that ship.  This might be worth investigation; I assume that the Rigel incident is documented somewhere.  Paul Stansifer 03:38, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rigel incident
Talk:Harriet Adams

message: FWDixon is a spammer and plagiarist with more than 100 links from Wiki to his web site to sell books thru Amazon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.205.13.193 (talk • contribs) 12:27, 20 August 2005   (UTC)
*See discussion with anon about links in question here. ∞Who?¿? 19:38, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did she write any Tom Swifts?  Puddytang 23:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Swift 

message: The categorization as writting under a male pseudonym seems odd.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should she be categorized for writting under a male pseudonym, when most of her works were under female pseudonyms?
Talk:Jasper Maskelyne

message: A note: the ancestor JNM made one of the earliest (first?) proportional-spacing typewriters. 142.177.19.171 17:38, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative accomplishment 

message: so this guy became notable out of an act of media deception? the richard stokes stuff needs to be at the top and thenmaybe header syain soemtehkng like 'despite this became famous recetnly ' etc.. ? Tiksustoo 10:38, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Which article are you referring to? The phrase "African theatre" doesn't occur here; and the article states exactly where he was employed while in Egypt. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article tone 

message: I've bitten the bullet and (almost) completely rewritten the article, with everything now attributable to proper sources. There is scope for careful embellishment with claims from his own book, and anything we can prove about his life in 1942 in particular. But I hope people will find this an improvement. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  OK, try this
Talk:George Fox

message: OK, I've just added vast tracts of text to the first part of the article. There's still lots to cover - the entire 1660-1690 period is currently summed up in a single paragraph. Beyond his early life, the journal isn't very clear about how his religious opinions came to develop; while it's possible to say that such-and-such was the first known example of his refusal to swear oaths, that's not quite enough. Obviously there are plenty of episodes from the journal that could be recounted, but I'd like to aim for a high-level summary rather than a blow-by-blow account of where he preached when. --AlexG 18:35, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Second half is now fleshed out a bit more. --AlexG 01:26, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: Thanks to those responsible; I enjoyed reading this! — Matt Crypto 00:01, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice work

message: Hello, if anyone is interested, I just started a Quaker WikiProject, which can be found at WP:WQ or Wikipedia:WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers). Zach 00:31, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject notice

message: Is the date of death correct? Fox died on the 13th day of 11th month 1690 in the old (Julian) calendar used in England at the time, which had new year's day on 25 March. This suggests Fox's date of death in the current Gregorian calendar might be 23 January 1691, due to the adjustment for the different ways the Julian and Gregorian calendars calculate leap years. Evan G (talk) 04:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Product differentiation

message: i want to know what is just noticable difference and how it can be used.
----
Link title
----
I have removed the following until the author collects his/her thoughts:
:Vertical Differentiation vs Horizontal Differentiation
:Vertical differentiation is...
:Horizontal differentiation is...
mydogategodshat 18:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Can I get some free consulting?

message: Should this article be merged with Differentiation (economics)? Bokken | 木刀 11:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge ?
Wikipedia talk:Possibly unfree files

message: Why does it keep redirecting my requests? 172.58.59.4 (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 172, I don't understand the question. Why does what keep redirecting your requests to do what? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that PUF was closed. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 05:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bots
Talk:Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

message: The demographic maps from 1991 and 2013 published on this page are fake. There is no census 1991 or 2013 BY SETTLEMENTS, so it is not possible to divide the ethnic population into it. In the 1991 census in Bosnia, the division was by municipalities, not by settlements. Also, Federaton of Bosnia and Herzegovina did not existed in year 1991, many municipalities did not existed in that time, so it was impossible to tell ethnic composition of the same, and made ethnic maps. They said, "census 1991 and 2013 according to settlements". That don't exist, census by settlements don't exist, least publish data dond't exist. So it is fake. The maps( Ethnic composition in 1991 and 2013 ) published here are TOTALY fake. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina#Demographics
Also, I have one remark to Wikipedia Bosnian section in general, too many Serbian and Croatian hunting stories here, too many propaganda lies from Croatia and Serbia. You guys should check that much better and remove it!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB10:2F1:5900:1CD6:94:13E3:643E (talk) 08:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The demographic maps from 1991 and 2013 published here are fake!
Talk:George W. Bush/Archive 13

message: :Additionally, when protection is due to a revert war, the protecting sysop may choose to protect the version favoured by those more closely complying with the guideline on repeated reverts. See wikipedia talk:revert#The protection option for the discussion on this.
VV has consistently ignored revert policy and consensus decisions. Why is his version being preferred by Guanaco? -- style 07:28, 2004 Aug 22 (UTC)
:See m:The WRong Version.  RickK 07:31, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)
:: I guess you didn't check the page history. My point is that the page was protected by Blankfaze on Kevin's version and then Guanaco reverted it to VV's version. -- style 07:39, 2004 Aug 22 (UTC)
:::Then I suggest you bring it up at WP:RFC#Use of administrator privileges.  RickK 07:43, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)
:Blankfaze should not have protected the page, as he had been involved in this particular edit war against me .  I told him he should have recused himself on his talk page, and he is unrepentant.  I may file an RFC.  I believe Guanaco is acting based on Wikipedia:Three revert rule#Enforcement, a policy which may not be solid, but is not out of left field either. VV 08:13, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Former Texas Lt. Gov. and House Speaker Ben Barnes: "I got a young man named George W. Bush into the National Guard ... and I'm not necessarily proud of that" 
I'm not much involved in this page, so I'm not going to touch this one.  But, it might be of interest to other editors. Wolfman 02:27, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Bush TANG News
Talk:Forty Foot

message: Anachronism
Something wrong with either the date of deployment or the reason for the deployment, or Napoleon (1769-1821) casts a shadow not only beyond the grave but before the cradle:-)
the 42nd Highland Regiment of Foot...built a fortress here in 1747 when it was sent over to repulse any possible Napoleonic invasion of Ireland.
----
From VfD:
Forty foot: Well, This...is...interesting. I personally think that this is not notable enough for it's own article, but it does seem to have enough historical signifigance to be placed in another. But then again, it IS about a bathing house... MajorB 22:42, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is it called the Forty Foot, and is swimming naked still allowed and performed there, anymore? O'Dea (talk) 11:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two questions
Talk:Army of Republika Srpska

message: In the Mitrović and others case ("Kravice") the army is referred to on the State Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina  English language website as Republika Srpska Army (RSA) this combination should be mentioned somewhere in the lead of this article. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republika Srpska Army 

message: Was the Coat of arms under the writing with the Swords the Coat of Arms of the VRS form 1992-1996?
http://www.mycity-military.com/slika.php?slika=114563_93781487_2014-07-14%2009.29.26.jpg
Shumokuzame33 (talk) 15:05, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of Arms from 1992-1996? 

message: You could also made it redirect in Wikipedia by calling it the "Forces of the Serb(ian) Republic." As you well know, Republika Srpska means "Serbian Republic" referring to the statelet in Bosnia that wanted to merge with Serbia to the east and stay within Yugoslavia.
24.154.66.169 (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Army of the Serb Republic
Talk:Suzzallo Library

message: When I first came to the UW, I was told that the figure of Darwin once had a monkey on his leg, but that in a prank/riot in the 60s or 70s, the leg was chiseled off.  It looked (and looks) to me as though Darwin is missing his left leg.  Is there enough truth to this story to include any of it here?  Just curious. Jwrosenzweig 22:57, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  I've never heard this.  I'll definitely take a look next time I have occasion to visit the campus.--Jkiang 02:44, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The last sentence of this article stands alone in its own paragraph, and really seems to be a conclusion that lacks any kind of substance or, well, conclusion. It also appears that it is there mostly to be a second caption for the staircase picture. Should this sentence be removed or expanded upon? EWS23 16:56, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uninspiring Ending 

message: Shouldn't there be something here about how the building's elaborate Gothic exterior was, in part, Keynesian pump-priming during the Great Depression? I don't have a citation on that, but I'm sure it's out there. -- Jmabel | Talk 20:06, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economics 

message: this article is all about the architecture...what about the library itself? --24.19.3.231 03:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: library?

message: Allen Clark executed the sculptures at the front of the library in 1924. I have no idea whether they were appropriately copyrighted and the copyrights renewed; if not, we should add an image of at least one of these to the article. Also, he died in 1950, so in 2021 the works will be out of copyright in any event.
FWIW, if someone can sort through this, and if the sculptures are not still under copyright, someone can grab one of my images from http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmabel/sets/72157621064485137/, where I have some good photos of these (Flickr is a lot looser about copyright issues than we are). - Jmabel | Talk 05:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sculptures 

message: Should we add an image of Allen Library to the article, since it seems to be covered in the text? If so, here's one: 
:Commons:File:University of Washington - Allen Library 01A.jpg. Jmabel | Talk 05:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now added.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allen Library
Talk:Via Aquitania

message: The clear sections divide the content into easily digestible pieces.  Great job portraying the significance of Via Aquitania by explaining the characteristics of the cities it connected. You might want to mention the physical length of the road or include a map indicating where Via Aquitania is located. Also, it is a bit unclear from the context if Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus, who you noted as the builder of Via Domitia, is also responsible for constructing Via Aquitania.
-Chris Chang
Don't delete. I am going to make a proper stub. Academic Challenger 23:40, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:National Academy for Gifted and Talented Youth

message: The subject is worthy, but this article is far too promotional! I hope somebody (preferably somebody who knows about the project) rewrites it in a much, much more encyclopedic style. I have listed it for Cleanup today, pointing out that it needs a good soapy NPOV bath. Bishonen 23:54, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That's great work, Estel, I don't think it's POV at all now. I've done a little copyediting, but please note that where my sentences are shorter than yours, it's not because I mean to remove any information, it's only because sometimes the information is already implied. E. g. the concept of "research" implies that it's scientific. 
Looks like there might have been a word or words missing in "in order that they are better able to provide and education for Gifted and Talented youngsters." Please restore if there was, I can't tell what it was meant to be.
I haven't changed anything to speak of in the last paragraph. I think it needs some language change, but I don't understand it well enough to do it. What does "the professional academy" refer to? (Distinguished from "the Academy".)  Didn't you like my "... Aspire will split up into two editions, aimed at student and professional needs respectively"? (I thought it was rather neat. ;-)) Anyway, good work on the NPOV, congratulations. Bishonen 22:18, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV 20 Sept

message: I just copyedited this article. I recommend cleanup in terms of:
* British English - someone who knows British English should go through and standardize (standardise) the spelling throughout. There are some cases that I noticed, but I thought there should be more.
* The speculative information in the lead section about 2008 needs to be updated. To what I could research, IGGY is operational. But I am only the copyeditor - someone who cares should update that.
* The speculative information and announcement of a competition, appearing at the end of the article, is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Please update it to reflect what happened or remove it entirely.
Thanks! It looks like this article has received a lot of attention from caring editors and stakeholders in the project. I hope you will revisit this work soon. -Paulmnguyen (talk) 00:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup recommendations
Talk:Maxi Jazz

message: Today the Discography > Faithless section of this article just links to the main Faithless article. I was going to changes this to Faithless discography, but that includes works which Maxi Jazz isn't part of. What's the best way to handle this? Is it to replace the link with a list all the Faithless works that Maxi Jazz is part of? The overalp is significant but not perfect.
Elguaponz (talk) 03:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography and Faithless 

message: Although this article probably has improved vastly since it's beginnings, it's perhaps not quite up to standards that we'd like? Sadly I'm not a huge faithless fan, although their 2001 concert on Roskilde made me a diciple for life ;)
I can understand that Maxi Jazz is a bit secluded, it should be possible to fill out this article right? Especially by a major "expert" on Faithless/Maxi Jazz(read: die-hard fan)...
Best of luck people, let's move this article even further! :D
the--dud 12:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and Expert Tags 

message: Can anyone be so kind as to flesh out the pre-Faithless and perhaps Racing and 1GL sections? I'm a tad new to this lark. Is the writing style okay? Have I used too many headers? Feel free to be merciless. Equanimity two 00:47, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes by Equanimity two 

message: 49 or 50 TomGreen 14:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  can anyone tell me how old maxi jazz is 

message: I heard a rumor that he is and I can't tell from the picture.
Family Guy Guy 07:01, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he eighty years old? 

message: I am not sure whether this is edit of yours is serious.[] Are you aware of the need to have reliable sources? Also the need to make edits that fit into the rest of the article? --Merbabu 16:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Your edits to U2

message: I understand he was born in 1957, but the actual date of that year needs citing really. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TomGreen (talk • contribs) 17:40, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual date of birth 

message: The article does not mention how long he has been a Buddhist, nor what his previous religion, if any, was. Does he qualify for the converts to Buddhism category? Werdnawerdna (talk) 03:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Buddhism

message: I cleaned up the article for the most part, but whoever considers one or two references and two paragraphs of text to be a Start ranked article should re-read WP:MOS. Buddhism isn't even mentioned there. How can it be ranked for that group as more than a stub??  Please. I re-ranked the article as a stub. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 02:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I revised the ranking to "start" based on the assessment criteria, and considering that the article has about 3000 characters of prose, clearly more than a stub. --ELEKHHT 05:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article ranking