lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ahuru

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:57, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Bowl Alliance

message: There are contradictory statements on the page regarding this.  I'm especially suspicious of the claim that the Coaches Poll was forced to put Nebraska at no.1 because of their bowl victory, which given the 30 first place votes for Michigan and other speculation re: why the coaches voted Nebraska over Michigan (particularly Tom Osborne's retirement), doesn't seem to make sense.  Dkfan9 (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coaches poll locked into Bowl Alliance winner as No. 1?
Talk:Banded whiptail

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Blackspotted grenadier

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Blue antimora

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Blue grenadier

message: I removed the references to Mc Donalds. There is really no encyclopaedic need to include the fact that this-and-this company in this-and-this country is using a certain species and / or stock (that wasn't even included) in it's products. Please don't re-include this in the article without giving a good reason for it here. DanniellaWB 22:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mc Donalds

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Bollons' rattail

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Campbell whiptail

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 16:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Timothy Dexter (businessman)

message: I remember hearing somewhere that it was the rubber industry, not the molasses trade, that made this venture a success.  Can anyone verify or disprove this? Davemcarlson 06:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Heating Pans Venture

message: What a character! I see that he couldn't spell but was clearly no fool. He seems to have been born with an intuitive sense of enterprise. Is it possible that he was dyslexic?90.240.31.222 21:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dyslexia 

message: The whole thing sounds like a hoax to me. Borock (talk) 05:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What "whole thing" are you referring to? --Gene_poole (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The very identity of Mr. Dexter and all the "facts" about him sound like a collection of jokes. I didn't mean to imply that the WP article itself was a hoax. I think it reports on a long standing hoax that has been going on for many years. This is only  my impression given what the article claims. I have no other knowledge about Dexter, and I might be wrong. Borock (talk) 22:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dexter is a well-known historical personnage, and is documented in many citable sources, several of which are already linked to the article. I suggest you do some research on the subject. --Gene_poole (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Real?

message: Hi.  In the second to last sentence, it says that his house has become a library, or something.  Which house was that?
I'mn from Chester by the way.  There is a history book which includes a lot of good history on the town, Chester Revisted, and it included a lot of good information of Mr. Dexter.  I know that he used to ride a unicycle down Chester STreet, and he got whipped or something for something.  I've lost the book, so I'm not sure, but if any one here is from Chester (which I doubt) you could add some more information.  I remember there were a lot of interesting things.  I'm sorry I can't remember . . .  He was called the Earl of Chester though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanpatnaude (talk • contribs) 06:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info?
Talk:Codheaded rattail

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 08:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Common ling

message: The map suggests a wider distribution than the article describes.  Can someone fix this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.195.132.121 (talk) 05:08, 19 August 2008
:: The map is correct. The article stating Ling are unrecorded from the Irish Sea, English Channel or 'south east coast of England's is nonsense. I've known people catch Ling in the Irish Sea and the British Shore caught record is for a fish caught at Season's Point Plymouth []. Stub Mandrel (talk) 10:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution

message: According to ITIS then the family of this species is Gadidae with a subfamily Lotinae, but here it is described as a family Lotidae. Is there any consistency in this? --ojs (talk) 00:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxa 

message: The phrase "Norse coast" is awkward and unusual. Is it just being used as a synonym for "coast of Norway"? 130.225.26.35 (talk) 20:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norse Coast
Talk:Cook's rattail

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:53, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Filamentous rattail

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Gargoyle fish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Love Soup

message: There seems very little point in a cast section, as most of the characters only appear in one episode, and the main characters are mentioned in the plot section. ISD 07:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted cast section

message: Did it start running this January?
Are there plot summaries anywhere?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisboote (talk • contribs) 16:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, the series has been delayed (again). It is supposed to start sometime this year on BBC One. ISD (talk) 16:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New series
Talk:Grenadier cod

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Hawknose grenadier

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 06:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Coelorinchus australis

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 05:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Kermadec rattail

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Longrayed whiptail

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem