lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Port Belgrano Naval Base

message: Noticed an incorrect statement about the period during which the aricraft carriers were based, made a quick ammendment but with more info and references will probably rephrase that paragraph.  Regards, DPdH (talk) 08:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most important ships based at Puerto Belgrano 

message: I'm working on improving contents and structure, using as example wikiarticles on US Navy naval bases. As I'm looking for verifiable sources, will appreciate any help in this aspect. Thanks and regards, DPdH (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion 
Talk:Bilingual communes in Poland

message: "Today Opole, along with the surrounding region, is known as a centre of the German-speaking Silesian minority in Poland."
Nevertheless, Opole itself does not have bilingual status? -- megA (talk) 16:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Act of 6 January 2005 on national and ethnic minorities and on regional languages communes where persons belonging to a national, ethnic minority or using a regional language constitute at least 20% of the inhabitants can introduce a minority language as a "supporting language". In Opole city-commune Germans constitute less then 10% of population. Aotearoa (talk) 11:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:We Need Girlfriends

message: Will Seth Kirschner, Patrick Cohen, and Evan Bass star in the televised version? They really made the show, and without them, it'll not be as popular. 66.57.20.114 (talk) 16:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree wholeheartedly. It's not just the story and the writing -- it's the characters they embodied. Awakeandalive1 (talk) 18:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

message: I have been added external links to articles about the series; ideally they should be incorporated as a review section. In the meantime, I put them there for reference. Alcarillo (talk) 21:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media coverage
Talk:Belair Stable Museum (Bowie, Maryland)

message: I'd support the merge as long as the article on the museum stayed with it's current name as the building is listed on NRHP.  Toddst1 (talk) 17:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The current name for the museum article is "Belair Stable Museum (Bowie, Maryland)".  Actually i would want to drop the "(Bowie, Maryland)" part of that as the first part uniquely identifies the place already.  The NRHP name for the place is "Belair Stables".  I think i'd prefer for the merged article name to be that, as it is a historical name and is descriptive of the history and accomodates the museum too.  The intro sentence could includes bolded mention of being also known as, or currently known as, Belair Stable Museum.  I think "Belair Stable Museum" and "Belair Stable Museum (Bowie, Maryland)" should be redirects to the new name "Belair Stables".  Toddst1, thanks for commenting and raising the name issue.  Perhaps your comment was addressed towards heading off use of "Belair Stud", which seems nondescriptive to me.  Would "Belair Stables" be okay? doncram (talk) 23:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Fully support.  I just don't want to lose the building name as it's recognized by NRHP.  I'm not sure I understand why  moved it to a title different than what is listed on NRHP 3 days ago. Toddst1 (talk) 15:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I support the merge and to drop the Bowie, Maryland. I've been admonished already about the addition of local place name modifier to distinguish names and will cease doing it.  I still have lingering concerns that historic or other locally important sites not on the NRHP WORLDWIDE can share a name and having the local geography indicated is very useful. I don't think that "Belair Stables" is that unique of a name. It's also very useful when you are using categories. Please note however that the Belair Stud is the name of the farm and its property (the horse), whereas the Belair Stables are the physical buildings that house those entities.  Therefore, this distinction would have to be made clear in the merged entry, esp in re: those in the horseracing community who know the Belair Stud quite well. --Pubdog (talk) 16:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks dog, I think we're all on the same page here. (no pun intended) Toddst1 (talk) 19:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do not merge. This article is about the stud in racing and breeding only. Handicapper (talk) 20:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal
Talk:Power center (geometry)

message: This page needs the disambiguating (geometry) after the term "Power center" since a power center is a type of shopping center. That would allow the common US spelling "power center" to be redirected to the present Wikipedia article with a British spelling, Power centre.  Edison (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation needed

message: The references appear to all be to one website. Is this concept really notable enough to have a Wikipedia article? If it lacks substantial coverage in multiple reliable and indel=pendent sources, then it fails WP:N and should be deleted. Edison (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Some of the terms used need to be explained or Wikilinked, such as "radical lines." Labelled diagrams would be extremely useful in clarifying what the article is about. Edison (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification
Talk:Dobby Walker

message: She is probably notable solely for being the first woman president of the notable National Lawyers Guild, but also if Robert Treuhaft is notable, then Dobby surely is notable for being a founding partner with him at their law firm.  Libertycookies (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable 
Talk:Hitchcock & Herrmann

message: *Herrmann had considerable success musically after parting with Hitch: Fahrenheit 451, Obsession, Taxi Driver
*Hitchcock and Herrmann DID speak again... 
Beckus (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Orléans

message: This article has been reduced excessively in scope . Much information provided in earlier revisions (accessible via the history file) has been omitted. The history of this diocese does not begin with Theodulf but in Gallo-Roman times. There is also very little on the twentieth century----Clive Sweeting
:Actually I think the material has mostly been re-ordered from where it was before. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Werehyena

message: Is the tribe an 'actual' tribe? The two references I've seen to it seem to imply it is not, but are not explicit, and this article does not make the fact clear.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CKnapp (talk • contribs) 00:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tribe?

message: I don't have the opportunity to check this article's cited sources, but other sources describe buda as the evil eye, not as lycanthropy.  However, they do note that buda is often ascribed to metalworkers and Beta Israel. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 22:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've since found sources that describe buda as both the evil eye and lycanthropy. - Gyrofrog  (talk) 16:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethiopia and buda 

message: I checked the link for Primitive Culture and it doesn't contain the information about Kanuri indicated by the article.  I was however able to track down both the correct citation and the original source where that citation got its information.  I intend to update reference 3 with the correct link and add a citation & link to the original source, African Native Literature, Kolle. Mercy Thompson (talk) 23:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 3
Talk:Economic results of migration

message: This article needs alot of work - it currently reads like an undergraduate essay written by someone whose English isn't great. Also, given that it is an economics-based article, the economics seems a bit vague and imprecise, and should include topics such as the effect of migration on wage inflation, unemployment, labour market dynamics, etc. I've never studied this topic in much detail so I'm not the best person to make these changes, but I'll try and do something when I have some time. Wilston (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: As mentioned above, poorly written. Slight story-telling edge to written English. --Yorkshire001 (talk) 14:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work 

message: Dr. Cebula has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Cebula has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Cebula, Richard & Nair-Reichert, Usha & Coombs, Christopher, 2013. "Gross In-Migration and Public Policy in the U.S. during the Great Recession: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis, 2008-2009," MPRA Paper 55449, University Library of Munich, Germany.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 00:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Cebula's comment on this article 

message: I propose merging Economic results of migration into Immigration. I think the content of Immigration#Economic effects strongly overlaps.HudecEmil (talk) 13:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged HudecEmil (talk) 17:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Template talk:East London Line RDT

message: I removed these markers, partly because they were odd things to have on the map, and partly because they weren't necessarily in the right place. They should be between the ELL and NR platforms at New Cross Gate, and the situation beyond Dalston Junction is debatable given the recent decision to give the ELL its own platforms and track.
Also, the depot is shown in the wrong place, but I can't see an easy way to fix it; it should be roughly on the horizontal bit labelled as the flyover, and certainly isn't east of the tracks. --Mr Thant (talk) 01:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfL National Rail boundary 

message: Application to Lewisham Council includes a PDF of the submitted plans; includes separation of the ELL from main line, plus another has artists impressions of the flyover bridge (pages 7 & 8). --AlisonW (talk) 23:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Cross Gate revisions 

message: Should this formerly important link (e.g. Liverpool St to Brighton on LBSC) be included? --Old Moonraker (talk) 11:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its already included. Simply south (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it? --Old Moonraker (talk) 18:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the link ran along the NLL then branched off at Dalston and ran down to Broad Street, i think, which was situated next to Liverpool Street. Simply south (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this one. --Old Moonraker (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I do stand corrected. Could you provide the date in which occurred and was removed? Otherwise, go ahead. Simply south (talk) 20:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's done—thanks User:AlisonW. The dates were 1876 to 1966. --Old Moonraker (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoreditch to GEML 

message: Didn't the Great Eastern Street Viaduct go into Broad Street? --Old Moonraker (talk) 14:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thanks User:Kevin Steinhardt. --Old Moonraker (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Oops my mistake - wrong line, sorry. Cnbrb (talk) 22:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Eastern Street Viaduct 

message: According to OpenStreetMap, the Northern City Line and Victoria line cross the ELL and NLL perpendicularly at Highbury & Islington without completely crossing over each other, so the current diagram is inaccurate. Is the best way to show this interchange diagonally (, in tunnel beneath ELL and NLL) or horizontally ( with an INTq to the right of the NLL)? Jc86035 (talk) Use to reply to me 08:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this what you had in mind? Useddenim (talk) 00:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, something like that. I'll replace it in the diagram. Thanks. Jc86035 (talk) Use to reply to me 07:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highbury & Islington 

message: Would this template be better named as "East London Line"? 
Given that the ELL extensions have long been completed - and the template shows a accurate route map of the line?Turini2 (talk) 22:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  renaming template
Talk:Polkadot Cadaver

message: Ok, it's not exactly notable now, but there's no reason why it won't be at least as successful as Dog Fashion Disco, seeing as it's basically the exact same band. 
The notability guideline for music says: 
"Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such."
Polkadot Cadaver obviously satisfies this. Pwrong (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, however it seems you are looking into the future for notability as opposed to looking in the past as Wikipedia does. If they split up tomorrow would they still be notable? I would say no. It would be nice if there were some album reviews or real media coverage (other then blogs). Anyway... it seems to be on the line. I would lean towards keeping it if it came to a vote just based on the DFD connection. Gtstricky (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:William Dennison (Canadian politician)

message: I do not think that John Sewell was ever a member of any political party.  --The Four Deuces (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What does that have to do with this article? -- CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 23:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Sewell 

message: Worth mentioning his involvement in changing the flag to the one used in Toronto today? Apparently he was outspoken about how the previous flag (which was just the city's crest on a white and blue background) wasn't really a flag. - CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toronto Flag?
Talk:Buzz!: Quiz TV

message: I think something needs to be done about the layout of this article. The additional infobox for MyBuzz and the reviews box makes it look really untidy. I don't think the MyBuzz box is really necessary as it is more of a feature of the game rather than a separate product. The fact the MyBuzz redirects here doesn't mean we need an infobox, as long as the information is included in the article. Any suggestions? ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 09:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My plan was for the MyBuzz! part of the article to hopefully go the same way as GTA:IV in so much as the Rockstar Games Social Club started life in the main article and eventually grew enough to support its own article. I accept that it looks a bit ropey at the moment but that is mainly down to the lack of info in the article at present, if the Website box was forced down the page by more content it wouldn't look half so bad. - X201 (talk) 09:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I think more information on MyBuzz in the body of the article would help that. At the moment there isn't much but I can't really think of anything notable. Anything I added would just be filler. ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 10:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: I really think the website infobox for MyBuzz in unnecessary. The features it provides are mentioned in the article. It take up a lot of room and doesn't provide much information. Opinions? ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 17:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bin it if you want, but remember to mark the logo for deletion. - X201 (talk) 19:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MyBuzz 
Talk:Cohesion (geology)

message: Is there soil with negative cohesion value?
Yojan V (talk) 14:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soil question
Talk:Rioni of Rome

message: Why do all the articles have "of Rome" in their title? Wouldn't just "(rione)" be enough? 216.8.129.17 (talk) 20:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because "Rione" is a  common denomination for ancient quarters in Italy. Alex2006 (talk) 04:57, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles 

message: Most of these images (none of which give their proper original source on Commons) appear to be from a printed book published in the early 19th century. They are not an accurate reflection of the coats of arms used today. See for example :File:Rome rione III colonna (logo).svg, whose description I have recently updated on Commons. It bears no relation to the modern coat of arms for Colonna, which actually looks like this. Voceditenore (talk) 08:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Rioni_of_Rome#Coat_of_Arms_of_the_modern_rioni|Coat of Arms of the modern rioni]] section is misleading
Talk:General Theological Seminary

message: The article claims that the General Theological Seminary has a Guntenberg Bible, naming a source from 1963 (St. Mark's Library (General Theological Seminary). The Gutenberg Bible of the General Theological Seminary. New York: St. Mark's Library, the General Theological Seminary, 1963. Pages 4-5).  This is no longer true, the General Theological Seminary sold that copy of the Bible to the Württembergische Landesbibliothek, in Germany, in 1978 for 2.2 million US dollars (Clausen Books Gutenberg Bible Census  accessed 24 August 2012).  Note that this is correctly mentioned in Gutenberg_Bible (see 'surviving copies' and 'recent history') and Württembergische_Landesbibliothek.  87.64.167.9 (talk) 10:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I think I've updated the section in line with your information -- see what you think. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  They sold their Gutenberg Bible 

message: See General_Theological_Seminary#Faculty_lockout User:Fred Bauder Talk 08:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: https://twitter.com/SafeSeminary/status/636190258149720064 Not a verifiable source, but an answer. User:Fred Bauder Talk 15:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The way it's currently written, the reader couldn't really know the outcome(s) of this debacle. Someone with more insider knowledge (and, of course, good sources) should fix this. Josh a brewer (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: So what happened?

message: I know the general aversion to , but what's the usual way to cite an inflation calculation? It's important to note that the apparently insignificant sum of $60k then had the purchasing power of more than $1m now. — LlywelynII 21:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Inflation

message: More at Dawley. The article should address the sectional issues in the run-up to the Civil War. — LlywelynII 21:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion
Talk:Lupercal

message: England's Poet Laureate, Ted Hughes, wrote a collection of poetry called "Lupercal".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.136.183.65 (talk) 08:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lupercal in Literature 

message: How is this word pronounced?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: pronunciation
Talk:Kyung Sun Shin

message: The article as it currently stands is still in need of cleanup. Having the tags up is a good thing. It points editors to the page, who can help improve the article. The cleanup and tone tags are there because the article is not properly structured yet. The tone of the article is still a little too promotional. Feel free to remove the tags once the issues are fixed. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for tone and cleanup tags
Talk:Anagārika

message: The article's statement "Given the lack of full ordination for women in modern Theravada Buddhism" would be contested by the numerous monastaries, bhikkhus, bhikkhunis, and lay people who identify as Theravada Buddhists and who accept the renewal of full ordination for women, in Australia, the United States, Germany, Belgium, England, and many other countries including residens in SE Asian countries. Therefore it is POV and controversial and amounts to promoting some claims against others. Db919 (talk) 05:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Theravada ordination of women 

message: History section is not history; it's contemporary practice. History would include reference to the 8 precepts described in the Early Buddhist Texts for lay observances of Upsothas, monastary and individual monastic attendents, and development of the anagārika role into contemporary history throughout Buddhism and cross cultually. It might reference naiṣṭhika brahmacārin (Hindu celibate religious student) vows or Indian Theosophists, which historian Laura Harrington cited in reference to Anagāika Dharmapafa in a 2011 Buddhist Studies Review paper but I am not an expert enough on the history to evaluate her identification of that as the spurce of Anagārika Dharmapada's title and observances. (She missed the 2000+ year precedents in Upsothas and the word's use in Pāli, at least.) As written, however, the section just isn't History. Db919 (talk) 05:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  HISTORY section
Talk:Thaidene Nëné National Park Reserve

message: This area is not a national park although it has been proposed. It is safe to call it a protected area. See .  –droll [chat] 02:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a park 
Talk:Dewanoumi stable

message: Two ex-san'yaku wrestlers who won a yûshô, Yamanishiki and Ayazakura, are not included in this list. I think they should be added. 
On the other end, Kushimaumi (never san'yaku, no yûshô) is included. What is the criterion to be in the list? I noticed that Dewanohana (also no san'yaku + no yûshô) is also included, but as he became rijichō, I get the reason. Sumo ch (talk) 10:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally we only list rikishi with Wikipedia articles unless there's a good reason. I'm not saying those two aren't notable, but particularly in this case with a heya as prestigious as Dewanoumi there are so many we could list - it seems odd to add red links.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:28, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable former members
Talk:Miyagino stable

message: I modified the article following the announcement of Ishiura's retirement to place him in the stable's retirees. For the moment, however, I've decided to keep Chikubayama in the coach category, as we don't know exactly when the switch from toshiyori's share will take place. - OtharLuin (talk) 06:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: later in the day it was confirmed that Ishiura would take over the name Magaki immediately after his retirement, the sumo association page having been modified, I have updated the article. - OtharLuin (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ishiura retirement 

message: Given recent developments and news about the stable's future, the section "Hokuseihō assault allegations" probably needs to be promoted section-wise. Should this wait until there's a final disposition on what happens? JRHorse (talk) 04:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stable's future 

message: Now that we know for sure where the wrestlers will go once the stable is closed (temporarily) I'd like to have a discussion about the fate of the wrestlers. I wasn't a wikipedian when Kise stable closed and so don't know how things were organized then. I know from Gagamaru's page that the temporary host stable is noted on the wrestlers page, but when do you think the actual change can be noted on the pages Miyagino wrestlers? - OtharLuin (talk) 13:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrestlers' future