Talk:Far-right politics in New Zealand

message: OK, the reason for these changes:
The right-left spectrum is best understood an economic spectrum ranging from freemarket policies on the right to collectivist/distributist policies on the left. Describing fascism as "far right" is inaccurate, as the social and economic policies and fascism tend more towards the left than the right.
It would be more accurate to call it for what it is, "National Socialism", but I'm not going to do that out of respect for socialist in general.  "Far right" would be better suited to the doctrines of libertarianism.  There is no need to label this article "far right" when it is more accurate and particular, and less controversial, to label it "fascism", for the sake of political neutrality.
If I may quote you Vardion;
"If anyone is able to gather and present evidence of my political beliefs from my edits, I will have failed to achieve my goal of neutrality."
:What's your reference for these assertions? Fascism is conventionally considered a far-right movemement. -Will Beback 00:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "More accurate" is a good reason, but is it correct? Is every individual, group, and movement listed here fascist? White supremacists are not necessarily fascist. -Will Beback 03:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Scoop calls the National Front "extreme right wing"  and "far right". Every political tendency has extremists - I don't think that calling groups like the NF "far right" is meant to reflect on more moderate groups, and economics is not the only input into the equation. I don't mind leaving the article where you moved it, at Fascism in New Zealand, but I'm not sure that it's the best title. -Will Beback 08:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big changes - Moved to new title: Fascism in New Zealand

message: There is an Interesting book "National Socialism In Australia and New Zealand" that my school library used to have, published in the late 1970s I believe. If somebody has a copy it would be a good reference for this article. - SimonLyall 10:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Book. 

message: This article doesn't really mention any kind of old school fascism in New Zealand, though it does cover the non-fascist roots of post-1945 neofascism. I think unless we introduce some additional material about pre-1945 groups or people we make the move just so the title's a bit more precise. Ecto (talk) 22:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Neofascism in New Zealand? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fascism in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050620092754/http://aijac.org.au/review/1998/231/nznazis.html to http://www.aijac.org.au/review/1998/231/nznazis.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Kia ora! This page needs a thorough expansion. I was wondering if anyone would be keen to help put some hours into expanding it? Nauseous Man (talk) 10:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs a thorough revamp