Talk:Lion Air

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 20:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: I think it should be mentioned that Lion Air (as all Indonesian airlines) is blacklisted in the EU (I can only state the German wikipedia as a reference now). --124.66.154.46 (talk) 06:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a comment and link to the banned airlines article. MilborneOne (talk) 12:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklist 

message: I have removed the blow from the main article. It isnt needed, most of it isnt notable and bullet points are not the best way to present them. --JetBlast (talk) 12:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Removed. 

message: An image used in this article, File:Lion Air Parking at Sam Ratulangi Airport.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Lion Air Parking at Sam Ratulangi Airport.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: The article mentions that 4 planes of this type are retired. This makes no sense for these new planes. Can anyone support this claim with a reference? If not supported I will delete this part in the article. Thanks --Shorty23sin (talk) 07:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Those four planes were apparently leased from GECAS and were returned to the lessor, according to Planespotters.net.  Even so, an aircraft shouldn't be listed in the retired fleet list unless all aircraft of that type have been retired.  Of course that's not the case with 737-900ERs, so I removed it.  —Compdude123 02:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retired B737-900ER planes 

message: Seems someone deleted at least 6 of the incidents in the last 12 month. I will edit the accident section and put the ones which were deleted back in. This is important information about the airline. --Shorty23sin (talk) 04:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I may have removed them because they did not comply with WP:AIRCRASH.  All incidents added to any article should comply with those guidelines, otherwise airline articles would have a bunch of minor, unimportant incidents that nobody would care about anyway.  —Compdude123 05:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone put an  template in that section, but I removed it because the page has all the incidents that comply with the WP:AIRCRASH guidelines.  —Compdude123 16:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidents and Incidents disappeared 

message: About the crash-landing on 13 April 2013: The cited references at bbc says: "It missed the runway by about 50m (yards) and landed in the ocean nearby." And the Aviation Herald writes "came to a stop in the sea short of the runway". So it seems to me that the plane didn't touch the runway at all. Has anybody a reference that says that the plane overran the runway?
The Aviation Herald also calls the flight JT-904.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.65.126.7 (talk) 13:44, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It did not overrun the runway. It was ditched approximately here.Zoef1234 (talk) 20:04, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overran or missed the runway? 

message: I suspect it is a low-cost carrier. Is it? Please correct me by writing on my talk page if I'm wrong.Maodi xn (talk) 13:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it is. However, Lion Group is also operating a full service airline called Batik Air. This included the Batik Air Malaysia (The name is Malindo Air when you commented this). Batik Air and Batik Air Malaysia is already existed when you're adding the comment. BroBro1222 (talk) 12:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it a low-cost carrier? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Lion Air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120113193539/http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/01/11/lion-air-sanctioned-over-pilots-with-crystal-meth.html to http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/01/11/lion-air-sanctioned-over-pilots-with-crystal-meth.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206154131/http://www.mediaindonesia.com/read/2012/02/04/296223/289/101/Lagi-Pilot-Lion-Air-Nyabu-Ditangkap-BNN- to http://www.mediaindonesia.com/read/2012/02/04/296223/289/101/Lagi-Pilot-Lion-Air-Nyabu-Ditangkap-BNN-
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/singapore-air-show/2012-02-14/lion-air-firms-boeing-order
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203000735/http://www.orientaviation.com/printfriendly.php?currentArticle=A20080924140914-3hW5o to http://www.orientaviation.com/printfriendly.php?currentArticle=A20080924140914-3hW5o
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111120181457/http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/11/18/indonesias-lion-air-rises-obscurity.html to http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/11/18/indonesias-lion-air-rises-obscurity.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20060304-0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203013632/http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Investigators-probe-Boeing-737s-into-sea-in-Bali-202914941.html?tab=gallery&c=y&img=3 to http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Investigators-probe-Boeing-737s-into-sea-in-Bali-202914941.html?tab=gallery&c=y&img=3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Where did the massive A320 order go? It no longer shows it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.81.123.120 (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Confusing! Airbus lists the order as one of Lion Air, while Wikipedia hat assigned it to the subsidiary Batik Air. --2A02:810D:2440:10B8:D71:A695:66D:9712 (talk) 09:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order 

message: Fleet table is outdated so I have to edit with new information. AdamsGander1807 (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. a!rado🦈 (C✙T) 11:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 April 2023 

message: Can someone change the quantity from 1 to 2 for the 737 MAX 9 at the fleet section? Because Lion Air is now operating 2 MAX 9s now. (PK-LRF & PK-LRI) BroBro1222 (talk) 10:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Heart (talk) 10:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/pk-lrf & https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/pk-lri May support the request. BroBro1222 (talk) 10:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are primary sources / original research; a reliable source would be secondary, e.g. a newspaper article about the second MAX9 in the fleet. Actualcpscm (talk) 12:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAX 9