lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Legacy Highway

message: Could someone provide a reference for the Mountain View Corridor being part of the Legacy Highway.  I don't think that it is. Val42 17:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While technically most people consider them seperate projects now, the Mountain View Corridor was originally part of the Legacy Highway. The part of the Legacy Highway that's under construction now is just the Legacy Parkway portion of it, not the entire highway. I can't find any specific sources at the moment, but I am positive that the Mountain View Corridor is part of the Legacy Highway project. Just do a bit of research, I'm sure you could find it; I don't have the time at this specific moment. bob rulz 05:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mountain View Corridor

message: This article needs a map of the proposed Legacy Highway.  I know that only the Legacy Parkway portion is "set in stone", but it would be nice to gather as much information as we can and make a map of the approximate route of the rest of this highway.  UTA used to have the northern route from Farmington to 12th Street in Ogden on their web site, but then the latest round of lawsuits came up and the proposed routes disappeared.  We should be able to find this information somewhere.  Does someone have something printed by UTA that has this information? Val42 05:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs a map

message: Since the Legacy Parkway is under construction, we should add specific information: Length, route, how much wetland is disturbed and what mitigation is being done. Val42 05:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More information needed

message: How about some discussion of the terrible waste of money and time, because of the intervention of environmental activists and local politicians who wanted to tender their national political aspirations at the expense of the people of Utah? The article should also discuss the merits of the environmental study  versus the long-term growth of Utah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.195.240 (talk • contribs) 
:You should read WP:NPOV. --NE2 21:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Litigation expenses
Talk:Utah State Route 154

message: shows a partial southeastern beltway, connecting SR-154 to Highland Drive and 9400 South (SR-209). It's been removed from the current version, but still appears on . Google maps, aerials, and street view show what appears to be a cleared right-of way through Sandy but no construction, and several disjoint sections of Highland Drive.  shows a proposed bike path there. There appears to be nothing in the corridor shown to connect Highland and SR-154, but the Bangerter Parkway has opened recently (apparently to serve the subdivisions on Traverse Ridge Road).
 also shows a partial second southwestern beltway, extending 5600 West to the curve in SR-154. Could Rosecrest Road be part of this?  shows that it has been realigned to enter Utah County (probably as part of the Mountain View Corridor), but the exact alignment shown is no longer possible.
Does anyone know the history of either of these? I found a bit about Highland Drive; has the land been sitting unused since the 1990s? --NE2 10:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All I can add is speculation. Those articles about Draper homeowners getting angry are from the mid- to late-1990s, right before I-15 was reconstructed. Perhaps the southeast extension was planned to be constructed as a part of the reconstruction, but this is just judging by the time period. As for the southwest extension of 56th West, I haven't heard anything on it. I remember reading somewhere that Bangerter was going to be upgraded to freeway status from I-15 to 13400 South (West Jordan said they were the largest city in the state without freeway access), but I'm not sure what the deal is with this either. A quick search of UDOT projects present and future here shows nothing. CL — 17:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm. The 2007-2030 regional transportation plan (May 2007) lists the gap in Highland Drive as four lanes on a six-lane right-of-way, to be constructed "between 2016 and 2025". There's nothing on SR-154 except making the east-west segment a freeway (also between 2016 and 2025), but don't forget the Mountain View Corridor (which would have a spur to SR-154 at 13400 South). --NE2 19:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southeast section? 

message: I'm assuming the route log for SR-154 was done before SR-71 was extended to Bangerter. In any event, this is where SR-71 terminates. CL — 17:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  126th/SR-71
Talk:Utah State Route 261

message: This article does not have any sections aside from the junction list and references, therefore it is a stub. -- Kéiryn (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The history is sure short - you sure that's all there is? --Rschen7754 00:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For some reason, the highway resolutions page on UDOT's website doesn't list SR-261. It's pretty hard to get its history from another source mainly because that's usually the only source there is. Besides, it has a so-so lead and junction list, so I think this is still a step above a stub. CL (T · C) — 00:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

text: But I guess I'll add a brief route description. CL (T · C) — 00:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Leapling

message: The page states that "leaplings will celebrate a golden birthday only in the year they turn 116." This conflicts with the definition at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_birthday as "the day when the age one turns and the date of birth coincide (e.g. someone turning 20 on September 20th celebrates his golden birthday)." By this definition, those born on a leap day simply will not have a golden birthday. (They're born on February 29, not February 116).
:I think the "point" that's trying to be made is after 116 years they'll have only had 29 "birthdays". Ewlyahoocom 17:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But that is not the definition of 'golden birthday'. Therefore, in my opinion, the sentence is just incorrect. It is correct to say that those born on a leap day simply will not have a golden birthday. I myself was rather confused by this erroneous sentence upon following a link to this article. 202.156.6.54 09:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The definition of a Golden Birthday is when a person's celebrated birthday equals the date on which he or she was born.  I have edited the article to show the simple mathematical equation which proves the theory.chanemza 03:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Linear approximation

message: *The crucial point of this approximation is that it is local around some chosen point. This does not become clear sufficienty.
*More or less, linear approximation make sense only for functions that are differentiable at the point of consideration. This should be made clear explicitly.
*The function f(x)=ax+b isn't linear in the sense of the reference "linear transformation".
Hottiger 16:29, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some changes. Feel free to clarify more where you think is not clear. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification needed

message: I was taught a different equation of linear approximation: f(x+h)≈f(x)+hf'(x).  Is it worth adding this to the article as well?Baggers89 (talk) 08:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Another form of the equation

message: First few sentences under DEFINITION should read: Given a twice continuously differentiable function f of one real variable, Taylor's theorem for n=1 states that....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.57.120 (talk) 05:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Remainder requires continuous second derivative 

message: There are several applications of linear approximations that could be mentioned here. The first to come in mind is the concept of marginal cost/revenue. 313.kohler (talk) 05:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Applications

message: Something extremely crucial is being left out in this article.  I was browsing the main article on differentiation and it also seemed to sidestep the issue.  
Take f(x) = x^2.  Then yes, the tangent line L(x) = 2x - 1 is a good approximation for f(x) near the point (1,1).  But so is the line L(x) = 3x - 2!  That is, both lines have the property that "limit as h goes to zero of f(1+h) - L(1+h) is zero".  
The fact that L(x) - f(x) approaches zero as x approaches 1 is NOT what makes the tangent line special among all other lines passing through the point (1,1).  What makes it special is that, if you take a smaller and smaller viewing window, f(x) becomes "indistinguishable" from its tangent line, which is not the case with any other line.  This is a statement about RATIOS of values, not DIFFERENCES of values.  I really think someone with more of a real analysis background than me needs to address this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.34.211.79 (talk) 01:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is the tangent line better than any other line?

message: For not twice differentiable function, how to define linear approximation, without using Taylor's theorem? -- Doyoon1995 (talk) 17:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not twice differentiable function
Talk:FLEX (protocol)

message: Mention why if it takes 4 minutes to complete, we can still get pages in
less that time.
--jidanni 2006-04-15
The full set of 128 frames takes 4 minutes total to complete. A single page may be completed in just one frame, which takes about 1.8 seconds. I'm not sure if this needs to be cleared up or not.
Gartner 00:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 minutes 

message: Describe sync word, including length and bit rate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gartner (talk • contribs) 00:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sync description
Talk:Nikon Coolpix 5200

message: part of this article I found at http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikoncp5200 It's funny, because it's cuts off in the middle, so it doesn't list the whole article. Pretty much half the article too. Camerooooon (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think this post was copied 

message: A shade larger than a credit card? Really?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.213.20.170 (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accurate Info?
Talk:Guidance system

message: Say German V-1 _rocket_/_bomb_/_submarine_ or something.
--Jidanni 2006-04-15
:Cruise missile in today terms. Why not to read the V-1 flying bomb article (found via "Go/Search" box)? BTW, "V-1" is a propaganda name, while the "native" one is Fi-103. --jno 07:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  say what V-1 is for offline readers 

message: Much earlier than the guidance system of the V1 were the gyroscopic stabilized torpedo guirdance systems. The first systems were developed in late 19th century only stabilizing the straighness of shots. True guidance systems allowing to programm simple courses were invented in Germany for use in torpedoes 1942 (so called LUT). Even earlier than the V1.--WerWil (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  earlier 

message: Here's what i removed:
--TiagoTiago (talk) 03:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   Book ad removed 

message: The article lacks recent advances in guidance systems, e.g. the execution
of complex track patterns for search-and-rescue tasks that are available
in current manned and unmanned systems.
Shall this be included?
Johann.Uhrmann (talk) 06:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More advanced guidance systems? 
Talk:Devil May Cry 2

message: Should this article mention the fact that Trish is an unlockable character? -Sherwood-Nightshade 02:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trish? 

message: This Featured Article has 3 dead external links which can be found here. Please fix them as soon as possible. Thanks! --haha169 (talk) 00:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Find "Official US PlayStation Magazine Review" is currently dead.  — Dispenser 01:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:VG External Links check
Talk:Quirks mode

message: In the table of section 3.1, shouldn't there be some sort of key like what A means what Q means etc.
Anish9807 (talk) 05:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read the text above the table? mabdul 14:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 3.1 

message: As far as I am concerned, yes. (I am using IE 10 consumer preview in Windows 8 consumer preview.) Sky6t (talk) 11:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, but do you have a reference for that? Otherwise this fact is original research and we can't include it. mabdul 11:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

text: You know, I have. But I am not so good at English. I wish someone to fix the bug.Sky6t (talk) 11:47, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

text: It is not WP:OR. You know, anyone can repeat this with an Internet Explorer 10. So it could not be an original research. It is a repeatable experiment. Sky6t (talk) 05:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, that's clearly OR. Nil Einne (talk) 05:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Repeatable experiment has nothing to do with it. Facts, regardless of how obvious they are, must be supported by a reputable source. Zeldafanjtl (talk) 21:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hasn't Internet Explorer 10 fixed the problem that a comment before the DOCTYPE triggers the quirks mode?

message: Equinox ◑ 10:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this obsolete? What about modern browsers like Edge?
Talk:Lag

message: Lag refers to delays experienced in computing communications.
Shouldn't this say something like:
Lag refers to an experienced delay (falling behind) and in modern computer networking it refers to a slow down in computing communications.
--Hogan 16:47, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Computing

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Lag moved to Lag (video games), Lag (disambiguation) moved to Lag. per discussion consensus and WP:PTOPIC criteria. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 21:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 August 2021
Talk:WWE Extreme Rules

message: ok the thing here is that the main event for extreme rules 2009 is wrong. i had changed it so it would be correct but then someone changed it back. the main event for extreme rules 2009 was edge and jeff hardy in a ladder match, not jeff hardy and cm punk. cm punk did come out afterword and cashed in his money in the bank, but that was not the scheduled main event. the ladder match was the scheduled main event 24.12.115.173 (talk) 17:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Edge/Hardy was not the main event (and you can't say it was the scheduled main event because WWE rarely ever announced what the main event will be ahead of time. The main event was Hardy/Punk. The match wasn't announced ahead of time, but that doesn't make a difference. TJ Spyke 17:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  extreme rules 2009 

message: Just thought I'd pop in and point out that the newest issue of WWE Magazine states that the 2010 edition of Extreme Rules will be the "Second Annual Extreme Rules" bringing into question whether it is, in fact, the same event as One Night Stand. Enjoy. :) Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd Annual Extreme Rules 

message: There is a video on Youtube where John Cena announces bin Laden's death to the crowd. I thought of adding this, but if there is a specific article for the 2011 edition, it would be good to tack this at the end of the show summary. CycloneGU (talk) 14:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Evidently, I'm slow. It's there already. CycloneGU (talk) 14:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just Chiming In Here 

message: I'm pretty darn sure it's about time to create an Extreme Rules 2012 page. But I won't jump the gun. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.253.197 (talk) 23:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extreme Rules 2012 

message: WWE Extreme Rules →  –
This article is not about the edition of 2012. Please revert to correct version. 187.91.10.253 (talk) 01:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Already been fixed so this can be closed.--174.93.169.157 (talk) 01:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 10 April 2012 

message: no source thats the main event 76.26.176.105 (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cena vs Lesnar 

message: The title of the next event is Extreme Rules (2012) and not WWE Extreme Rules 2012. This user ignored the protection and created other page with different title. 177.119.114.109 (talk) 06:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So what to change? it's a redirect... and don't post at two pages the same request! mabdul 08:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what the original poster was talking about was related to the fact that this page was breifely rewritten as an article about the 2012 event. That has since been corrected so there is nothing else that needs to be done.--174.93.169.157 (talk) 01:24, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 11 April 2012
Talk:Hanne Krogh

message: In order for this person to remain in :Category:Gay icons, the article needs to mention this "fact" in the body and cite reliable sources to support it.   --Rob 17:09, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Gay icons]]
Talk:Edu Falaschi

message: I've just placed the cleanup template. I believe this article may have grammatical errors since I'm not an English native speaker. --Kiko Loureiro 17:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Falaschi is a well-known brazilian gay rights activist, and currently is engaged to former band-mate and longtime lover, Kiko Loureiro."  I removed this line, because I suspect it may be vandalism.  It has no citation, and the person who added it in has only four edits in his entire history: This one, two counts of adding a similarly backhanded pejorative-sounding "is a gay rights activist" line to Universo Online, and one count of extremely blatant homosexuality-related vandalism to FC Barcelona Rugby.  If I'm wrong about this and this statement about Falaschi is actually true, feel free to add it back.  --68.35.129.180 11:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism?
Talk:Independent bookstore

message: Some of the "independent bookstores" cited are really small chains (Powell's, McNally Robinson).  They're still technically independent (cf. independent business), but the point could use some clarification.  For example, Books Inc. (10 locations, all in California) describes itself as "the West's oldest independent bookseller" . Alexbook (talk) 18:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nowadays, a 10-store "chain" is really just a large independent. Compared to B*&N* and B****** and a*****, they're like the moms and pops (outside of a tiny radius where they can be oppressively dominant just like the big guys). --Orange Mike  |  Talk 18:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that's my feeling, too, but it seems like the opening paragraphs could be clearer on the subject.  Just my opinion. Alexbook (talk) 19:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Define "independent bookstore"?

message: I wonder if indy bookstore would classify as a hobby shop?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly not; reading is civilization, not a hobby. --Orange Mike 13:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Hobby shop]]?

message: Is this list in need of trimming? It's susceptible to spamming, I fear; and there are a heck of a lot of redlinks there. I'm hesitant to boldly kill all the redlinks, including the new one just added. I mean, some folks belong here: most of the ones with article, from the Strand to Acres in Long Beach to Renaissance to Tattered Cover to City Lights; but what about the redlinks? Should we set a tacit 30-day (3-day?) limit and then start the trimming? --Orange Mike 13:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of well-known independents getting dodgy? 

message: Do we really want separate sub-sections highlighting selected stores?  Seems like a similar paragraph could be written about any of the stores in the List of independent bookstores article.
The recent addition of the Book Man makes this point.  I'm not saying anything against the Book Man, which I'm sure is a fine store and an asset to its community, but the same could be said for dozens of other stores.
--Alexbook (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured stores 

message: This article only discusses the history of U.S. bookstores. Is there a similar pattern of decline and renaissance in other countries? Or does the history differ? EmgriffUW (talk) 22:31, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of independent bookstores outside of U.S.
Talk:Genealogy software

message: Please see Template_talk:Genealogy_software#The_case_for_Software_As_a_Service_restated for a discussion of changes affecting this page also.
Randy Sevni.com (talk) 23:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *History of Genealogy Software
*COMMSOFT Introduces First Family Tree Software
*The ROOTS Story - Software to Make History - by Howard L. Nurse ("Howard Nurse is the son of the late David Nurse, former President of Heath Company" ) The Program was written for HDOS
:gioto (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Info for Possible New Section

message: Why is there no software used for historical genealogy research. I am not interested in my own family tree, but that of historical dynasties and want to use a software to create charts. Why is it that this is only geared towards personal family researchers?--Khodadad (talk) 06:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical research software? 

message: Considering how common it is for the people who inherit genealogy information to just toss the disorganized boxes in the trash.  I believe that ranking a page about organizing information with a low importance to be a grave mistake.   AManWithNoPlan (talk) 18:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 

message: How to add additional software title like WikiTree to this page? It belongs in "Software as a service (SaaS)" - "Free/Web-based".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fbax (talk • contribs) 02:31, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New additions