lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A Book Like This

message: According to Andrew Murfett, "After seeing an early show, Cathy Oates, an aunt of the Stones and, handily, a former head of marketing at EMI, offered to manage them".source. User:Cathyoates has extensively edited this page and other Stones' related pages. There may be a conflict of interest both as a near relative and a professional representative.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible conflict of interest?
Talk:Neozealandia

message: I would love to open up an article on Neozealandia, however, I wish to inform the administrators of Wikipedia that there are only few sources on the internet to support a highly detailed article about Neozealandia. Many sources on the internet only list the name "Neozealandia" but do not go into detail about this specific biogeographic province, except for articles of original research. Most of the information in the article was gathered from related Wikipedia articles. Until more sources can be found, I will not add any detailed information on this subject.
:Sources are not limited to the internet - refer WP:RS for information on sources that may be used. NealeFamily (talk) 01:46, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flashpoint

message: I can see no peculiarity of this Dab'n situation that outweighs the value of sticking to our two collectively almost universally applicable Dab formats, the primary and the equal Dab'n. These two are distinguished, and their characteristics elucidated, bcz they are virtually complete (perhaps absolutely so) in being able to handle all Dab'n situations. Perhaps there is some situation where each fails to meet the need, but even if so, the two are so close to collectively solving all Dab'n needs that there is no excuse for inventing another except in the probably virtually unique cases that truly are intractable using just the two normal approaches.   The "clean" situation is the primary Dab'n: one sense of the ambiguous term accounts for not only more usage than any other, but in fact for more than 50% of usage instances. Nice and clean, in the sense that no user seeking the primary sense has to even read the Hatnote, which is indented (and probably ignored by repeat users of WP, who presumably get used to skipping to the lead sent of the article, and only reading the Hatnote when the lead doesn't match up with the topic they had in mind).   The standard (and only recognized) non-primary disambiguation format is called "equal disambiguation" for a good reason: the only value of trying to split out (even two) equal (or roughly equal, or even nearly exhaustive) topics would be to save most users of the Dab from distraction by more than one unwanted topic. Primary Dab, and multiple Dabs too little differentiated from one another to justify differentiating by estimated frequency, are probably the only two cases sufficiently distinct to justify either formulating criteria for further styles of Dabn or confronting users with more than the two basic styles of Dabn. Perhaps there are cases so gnarly as to justify inventing (for a relative handful of Dabs) one-off formats, but if so they are too rare to be worth working up a format to suit more than one individual case: hardly anyone will encounter enuf Dabs that address enuf Dabs to personally profit by finding the task easier the second time.--Jerzy•t 10:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applicable Dab format
Talk:George LeRoy Hudson

message: Has anyone got any sources that give us more than his name? Me lkjhgfdsa (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:The Gates of Gnomeria

message: Article name should be "The Gates of Gnomeria", not "Gates of Gnomeria". See the cover art. Diamon (talk) 05:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Guilherme (footballer, born 1988)

message: Both Milhomem and Gusmão are family names. One from the father (probably Gusmão), and the other from the mother.
He doesn't have a second name, what is optional in the Brazilian names.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.73.100.130 (talk) 14:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ba Chúc massacre

message: In november 2006 I've been in Ba Chuc and Phi Lai and gonna be back from October 17th 2007 to April 2nd 2008 for a field work in Antropology and Political Science of Khmer-Vietnamese relations.
Takima 19:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deep and comprehensive studies 

message: I did a Google search on this massacre. Only two books return the name. ( Insight Guide Vietnam by  Scott Rutherford and
Lonley planet by  Nick Ray, Wendy Yanagihara) both of which are travel guides. Google Scholar returns the Rutherford book but cits page 73 instead of page 21. 
With the source used to create the article all three sources use the spelling "Ba Chuc Massacre" not "Ba Chúc Massacre" so in line with the Wikipedia policy WP:NC I am moving the article.  --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 11:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Epizootic hemorrhagic disease

message: Hemorrhages can occur anywhere in the body.   Please be more specific about hemorrhages. --2600:6C48:7006:200:D84D:5A80:173:901D (talk) 02:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please describe hemorrhages in more detail 

message: The section on geographic distribution ends by stating  It seems unusual that the rest of the section discusses the distribution of the disease generally, but ends talking about the state of Indiana specifically. Additionally, this claim needs a supporting citation. -- TinselWolf (talk) 20:27, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographic distribution: specific/general 

message: — Assignment last updated by Scitalk12 (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Disease Ecology 6200
Talk:Canna virus

message: I see that 3 separate articles have been created for separate virus. They are sparse, and I as the one who created this page, I have no problems with information and references being transferred there, and this page just being a gardeners guide to virus. However, I am not a virologist and somebody else will have to do it :o) What do others think?
Giantsshoulders 19:45, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Host Identity Protocol

message: Information about the status of this protocol in real-world deployments should be added to the article. -- Beland 19:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pentapolis (North Africa)

message: The article "Pentapolis" is a verbatim copy of most sections of the "Cyrenaica" article, and provides no new or specific information on the Pentapolis itself. As such, it is redundant. If no objection is noted or significant material added to the Pentapolis page, I'll turn it into a redirect page. Cplakidas 23:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that context must be provided, but in this case, there is too little extra material. This article is, as I said, a verbatim copy of sections, without even removing some non-related material (e.g. the entire "Muslim and modern history" section)... However, if you intend to expand on it at a later date, OK, let's keep it, but restrict it on the Pentapolis, i.e. its original definition of the five major cities and the ecclesiastic eparchy. However, the way I understand it, although it retained the title "Pentapolis", the ecclesiastic province actually included all of the Cyrenaica, and not just the five cities. Thus, unless I got it wrong, it would be more appropriate to include it in the Cyrenaica article, in a Byzantine section right after the "Roman province". Regards, Cplakidas 17:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Ian Rice

message: Ian Rice isn't listed on the list of Melbourne lord mayors http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Mayor_of_Melbourne, and I can't find any other web references to him as lord mayor except for Carlton Football Club related pages. Perhaps the claim that he was lord mayor is erroneous?
-AM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.44.107 (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord mayor dubious?
Talk:Reach Out (Hilary Duff song)

message: These two articles are about the same song, someone fix it please.
*Reach Out (Hilary Duff song)
*Reach Out (And Touch Me) -- John Biancato talk 23:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two articles about the same song! 

message: .Nisior (talk) 15:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any Refernces?!. 

message: At the moment, I can not tell that it has been released in the UK, Amazon.co.uk, do not have it on there, and HMV has no recollection of ever selling it. So I don't think that it's been released in the UK yet, however the Music Video has only recently started going round.
The Album has released though!
Can anyone look this up for me and see if it's only Digital download (though I reckon it isn't because Amazon does their own digital download now. I hope someone can reply with a quick answer Jonni Boi 16:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD In The UK 

message: There's no physical release in the us except it's avaible in itunes.
76.22.0.108 (talk) 03:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Physical Release
Talk:Igor Stasevich

message: Actually Igor Stasevich, played even for his national team of Belarus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.97.102.198 (talk) 01:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  National 
Wikipedia talk:Protected titles/Historical list of titles/September 2007/List

message: As fun as this is could you remove 'Phoo Action' from this list please? 
A copyright vio was cited as the problem and this has been addressed*. Sadly the page is locked and nothing can be added to it. I'm aware that violations and vandalism are huge problems on Wikipedia but exclusion is not the answer, in fact, exclusion is what Wikipedia is against, in theory.
Scott Lyon 20:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Per this conversation, I am removing Cronology from the list. To get sure the newly created redirect is not modified, I am fully protecting it. -- ReyBrujo 04:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cronology
Talk:James Cunningham (Canadian politician)

message: The dab on the title, I think, should be James Cunningham (British Columbian politician); similar dabs are "Canadian politician", "Ontarian politician" etc.Skookum1 (talk) 03:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor quibble on dab
Talk:Living Tongues Institute for Endangered Languages

message: Thank you Katr67 for all your cleanup at this article.  I am just wondering, if anyone is listening, if we should get rid of the "Current projects" subsection, as it is almost certainly out of date by now.  It was added to this page a year and a half ago, and by now some of those projects are probably over (I know, for example, they finished The Linguists over a year ago) and they have probably started others.  The page this information was taken from hasn't been updated since October 2007. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 12:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say just remove the word "current" from the heading and we'll be good to go. I'll do that now. Katr67 (talk) 16:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Current" projects 
Talk:Nosy Boraha

message: The headline's first sentence admits that this island's current name is Nosy Boraha, not Île Sainte-Marie... should the article be updated to reflect this?
 pburka (talk) 16:36, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change?
Talk:Jan Lakeman

message: We know Lakeman was running for political office in 1926.  At the youngest he was born in 1906, and that is the youngest.  This means he is 106 if still alive.  This would be rare but believable.  Since we have no indications in the article he has done anything in the last 65 years, he is at best possibly alive.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we can say with some confidence that this is our boy.  Probably not RS, but I'm pretty confident Buddy's no longer with us. Steve Smith (talk) 03:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I saw that one as well but hesitated to add it on the slight suspicion that he may be still alive or that it was a false positive. Pretty sure he's dead, I can maybe look for an obit when I get time. – Connormah (talk) 00:42, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only possibly living
Talk:Fort San Pedro

message: Hi. Article says the fort was built under the direction of ML de Legazpi. He died in 1572. But the article says it was built 1700s.Poysugbo (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Jared Tallent

message: Please note that information added to articles must be reliably sourced in order to allow for verification of the information. Please do not add unsourced statistics or information, or restore challenged information, without ensuring that you also include a reference for verification. If you are unsure how to format a citation properly, please feel free to provide it in this section, along with the information you are looking to add, and I will be happy to format and insert it on your behalf. Note that if you have an affiliation with Jared Tallent, WP:COI applies and should be read as well. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the various COI IPs continue to add the unsourced and POV material to the article despite multiple talk page explanations as to why they are inappropriate. The note above applies regardless of how many IP addresses you choose to edit from and the addition of unsourced and non-neutrally phrased material will continue to be removed until it complies with the Wikipedia policies I have repeatedly pointed you to. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Jefferson (footballer, born January 1988)

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Jega (musician)

message: Ok... "has been called the Stanley Kubrick of electronic music"?!? Seriously?!? Because someone posted it as a comment on a myspace blog post?!?!? FOR REALS THIS IS HILARIOUS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.45.125 (talk) 03:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is indeed absolutely ridiculous and I've removed it. I can only assume it was added as a joke. –CapitalLetterBeginning (talk) 12:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trager approach

message: There's interesting content in the article, but it seems that all of the references are from official Trager sources (and one or two books on the method). Are there any peer-reviewed scientific papers by researchers with no connections to the Trager Institute/Association/etc?
:Destynova 16:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. This seems to be just the kind of page to have a section "Criticism". Without it, I'd approach it with lots of caution. Hexmaster (talk) 11:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a fairly established form of bodywork (though I think it was more popular decades ago than now), so I'm certain there are secondary sources - especially books that review and summarize a dozen or so modalities - that discuss it. I will add a couple of sources give the article have a bit more grounding. I'm not sure that anyone currently cares enough about it to write much "criticism" in the sources, but it would be appropriate to state that it (probably) doesn't have any science specifically supporting it (once someone has checked the various channels to ensure that's true). --Karinpower (talk) 22:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased references? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Trager® Approach and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 2#The Trager® Approach until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  BD2412 T 20:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Trager® Approach" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:John William Thomson

message: He just lost his wife Joan Elizabeth McFarlane Thomson in late July 2023. Her obit appeared in Globe and Mail in August. 
Married on May 5, 1956, two children born in St. Catharines, and three in Calgary. Here's hoping that one of her children pens a "Lives lived"..... 205.189.94.9 (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wife's obit in August 2023
Talk:United Nations Mercenary Convention

message: Category: WikiProject United Nations articles
and what, pray tell, is the CONTENT of this convention, aside from defining the term "Mercenary"?
Someone must have forgotten to write the article...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wefa (talk • contribs) 18:21, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be helpful if all signatory countries were marked on a map. 79.241.79.158 (talk) 22:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: American contractors do NOT meet the elements of the definition. Element (c) states: "Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict". America is obviously a party to the conflicts in both Iraq and Afghanistan. So any American who goes there to fight or serve in the conflict is not simply some disinterested party fighting for nothing but financial gain. Their service enables their nation's war effort. Walterego (talk) 13:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Turn list into map?

message: Question: how are American military contractors in Afghanistan and Iraq not mercenaries, when they meet all elements of the definition?  If they are mercenaries, then what are the implications of the wholesale employment of mercenaries by the USA? I realize this is not a discussion page, so I suggest that there needs to be a section on this topic. It is the proverbial "elephant in the room" in this article.Royalcourtier (talk) 06:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: American contractors do NOT meet the elements of the definition. Element (c) states: "Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict". America is obviously a party to the conflicts in both Iraq and Afghanistan. So any American who goes there to fight or serve in the conflict is not simply some disinterested party fighting for nothing but financial gain. Their service enables their nation's war effort. Walterego (talk) 13:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military contractors 

message: Under "See Also", this unexplained phrase is used in, from what I can tell, its only appearance on the internet. Anybody care to elaborate? Epsilon.Prota (talk) 12:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side legal volley?
Talk:Baron Kingsale

message: The Complete Peerage begins their account of the family with Patrick de Courcy, the second of this list, attested  as a magnate from 1221, and says his parentage is unknown. The peerage may date from c. 1340, or later, and the 1397 patent "has been mistaken by many modern writers" as a confirmation of peerage. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So there is uncertainty over this too?  1221, 1223, 1295, 1340's, 1397...? I had not realised there was so much uncertainty in such things. SeoR 11:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In those days you could be a baron of a place but not necessarily a baron in the House of Lords - the idea behind lords of the manor.86.42.203.50 (talk) 22:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cokayne
Talk:Conrad Poohs

message: I removed the deletion notice because it appeared to me to be an arbitrary notice placed on several Monty Python sketches. While its true that this skit and several others can not be absolutely defined as notable, I would argue that was actually the nature of Monty Python. Some of the funniest bits of that show were not the sketches which are commonly known, such as Spam but really the segue pieces. I am therefore removing the deletion notice on the grounds that it is arbitrary, and that Wikipedia provides an excellent repository for showcasing Monty Python skits. There are after all 100s of Monty Python Skits and only a handful that have been made into articles in Wikipedia.--10stone5 20:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cardiac yoga

message: This seems like promotional material for a less than noteworthy 'sub-sect' of hatha yoga. With no notable history, patronage, or distinct features. Prime of Life Yoga and several others styles approach yoga almost identically. In fact, if anything we need a page about Dr. Dean Ornish and his studies proving yoga can reverse coronary artery disease. I suspect this was created by someone connected to the 'founder' of this 'style'.Iṣṭa Devata (talk) 20:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional?
Talk:Fumagalli

message: vouta para o sport nois te amamos 
    junior recife pe 
  fumagalli eternamemte
juninho_rc_@hotmail.com 
vc é um mito rubro negro  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.70.164.164 (talk) 00:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are several other notable individuals with the surname Fumagalli (Adolfo Fumagalli, Michelangelo Fumagalli, Corrado Fumagalli). Should Fumagalli be a disambiguation page? Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 
Talk:Alberta Liberal Party candidates in the 2008 Alberta provincial election

message: If somebody is sufficiently notable for a biography (requiring non-trivial coverage in multiple sources), then they should have a biography in it's own article.  If they are not, they should have no biography anywhere.  However, some editors, for reasons of "compromise", have instead decided to give absolutely all candidates a biography in composite articles like this.  We fill it with non-election related details.  And if somebody runs in another election, we'd need to duplicate it in each "list of candidates" composite article.  This artcle should have a a true list, giving only basic details, and then having prose that discusses the overall candidate pool.  Per-candidate sections should not exist.  Putting 100% of the information in the "per-candidate" sections, is an admission the authors think they deserve their own bio.  I'm sure the fringe candidates love this approach.  People looking for info on candidates with actual coverage, will find the fringe candidates here, along with unsourced trivia.  --Rob (talk) 23:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. We should "make it so, #1." Garth of the Forest (talk) 05:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: The footnotes/references are messed up, from the poorly thought out merges.  You can't just take a an article, and blindly copy/paste into a separate section of another article.  It takes a lot more thought and planning. 
Has anybody read through any version of this whole article, and thought it is cohesive? --Rob (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnotes screwed up

message: I suggest, that if we can't get pics for most candidates, we have none.  In stand-alone articles, it's not noticiable, if just some candidates have pictures.  But, for list articles, it treats the candidates unfairly to give some pics, and not others.  Plus the quality of pics, will vary wildly.--Rob (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures