Talk:Algonquin Provincial Park

message: Someone posted above that they didn't like the tone of the article and there is a box on the top of the article about how it is written. i don't see anything wrong with talking about the rules and such. it is importand information for potential park visitors so that they know what to expect and are prepared Magnetawan (talk) 13:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally don't see anything terribly wrong with the tone; if the person who tagged the article could explain why they tagged it, maybe we'll have some place to start. Like most WP articles, it could use some tweaking, such as using proper list techniques to list the plants, animals, etc, but unless there is explanation as to why there is an issue with the tone and style I think it would be okay to remove the tag.BC (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and think it should be taken down unless someone gives an arguement about what specifically is wrong with it and what needs to be fixed --Magnetawan (talk) 15:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of the Article

message: I don't know how to write them in, but there seem to be a lot of articles about things in the park which aren't mentioned here: Achray, Ontario, Brent crater, Brent, Ontario etc. Maybe a category is needed? --Padraic 16:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree something is needed to incorporate these links and many others such as links to the resorts which once existed in the part. perhaps even a category on the resorts themselves I think. It would be great if the links you mentioned could be incorported into the other information. Maybe also consider adding all the links to other locations in the park to the See Also section. Magnetawan (talk) 13:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Some people may not realize just how large the park is.  It is three times as large as the country of Luxembourg in Europe.  Is this worth a mention in the article?  It may have more impact than a numerical value of square kilometers.131.104.115.99 15:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of scale

message: :Image:Algonquin Stamp 1993.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Algonquin Stamp 1993.jpg

message: :Image:April in Algonquin Park.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:April in Algonquin Park.jpg

message: I found a map on the government website; I'm not sure if it qualifies as fair use as a government publication, but if someone wants to check it out it might be okay to use. Mr. Absurd (talk) 20:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the tag in the hopes that someone could find or create a free map, not just a fair use one. Thanks for looking though. --Padraic 16:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps

message: Someone posted above that they didn't like the tone of the article and there is a box on the top of the article about how it is written. i don't see anything wrong with talking about the rules and such. it is importand information for potential park visitors so that they know what to expect and are prepared Magnetawan (talk) 13:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally don't see anything terribly wrong with the tone; if the person who tagged the article could explain why they tagged it, maybe we'll have some place to start. Like most WP articles, it could use some tweaking, such as using proper list techniques to list the plants, animals, etc, but unless there is explanation as to why there is an issue with the tone and style I think it would be okay to remove the tag.BC (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and think it should be taken down unless someone gives an arguement about what specifically is wrong with it and what needs to be fixed --Magnetawan (talk) 15:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of the Article

message: Ok, I am no bird expert but this is ridiculous... there are only Blue Jays in the park??  How about Loons, Crows, Mergansers, Cardinals, etc, etc, etc.  This is not my subject to fill in but frankly the section is poor.   I listed 4 more birds without even thinking about it....  I forgot humming birds, and owls.  You see and hear both of these bird quite often...
I'm no bird expert either, but it was simply laziness that stopped me from adding the birds section when I created the other flaura and fauna lists. I have now at least made an attempt at filling out this section.-- Tom MacPherson (talk) 13:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birds of Algonquin 

message: I was wondering if someone could help me update the '2008 map' on this page? The new 2009 version is on my website - www.algonquinmap.com
Jeffrey (The creator of the map)
** Hi Jeff, added your web site as an external link.  (Love your map).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.155.51.153 (talk) 14:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 Map Image

message: I don't think John Denison should be listed here. Is this a list of famous people who happened to die in the park, or a list of noteworthy deaths of otherwise unknown people? John Denison had no fame outside the park that I know of. If he is listed, then shouldn't we list all of the people killed or attacked by bears in the park? And why do we have a 'famous deaths' section here at all? Tom MacPherson (talk) 13:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted this person. The guideline says that to be significant enough for inclusion, the person should warrant his/her own article. I agree with you; I also don't like the 'famous deaths' section. It doesn't seem to fit and doesn't really add any value to the article. The section is also attracting inappropriate additions. Pretty soon everyone who has heard of someone who died in the park will want the name listed, and we will be continally removing those names. It has also attracted family members who feel their relative is noteworthy (they would be to them) and therefore should be listed. BCtalk to me 15:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Deaths 

message: Aren't there several ancient series of petroglyphs located in Algonquin park? Some pictures of these would add tone to the article...--Oracleofottawa (talk) 05:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Petroglyphs

message: This section was added to provide relevant information for visitors to the park. Please limit entries to one line and avoid superlatives. Happy paddling!Stuart L. Letovsky (talk) 13:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outfitters and Guides section 

message: Can the original poster please provide the citation to the 1892 Royal Commission (as opposed to the statute [56 Vic., c.8]?  I'm curious to read it. Yes, Really.  Thanks.. --Steeleworthy (talk) 02:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation to 1892 Royal Commission 

message: I just removed content re: Native history and land claims since the bulk of it was copyvio. I believe, however, that some content about Native history is relevant. IMO, the land claims content, most of which was a very long quote was also copyvio and was way too detailed. I do, however, think that a short mention about land claims is a good idea once this section is rewritten to WP specs. -- BC  talk to me 22:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native history/land claims 

message: The wolf attack incident in 1996 happened at that park, so it should have it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4701:C4A0:892A:BB54:F160:8D2A (talk) 11:22, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incidents 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://algonquinartcentre.com/about/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   BC  talk to me 19:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Should the incidents be added on the page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.86.71.225 (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! Tkbrett (✉) 18:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incidents at the park 

message: The "Railway, settlement, and the beginning of tourism" subsection has this text: "The village of Mowat on the west side of Canoe Lake was first established in 1893 as a logging camp for the Gilmour Lumber Company. From there, logs were driven down the Oxtongue River towards Lake of Bays and eventually on to Trenton." (my emphasis added) The Oxtongue River does flow to the Lake of Bays, but the Lake of Bays flows via the South Branch Muskoka River, Muskoka River, Lake Muskoka and the Moon River to Georgian Bay on Lake Huron. However, Trenton is at the mouth of the Trent River on the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. The two river systems are not interconnected. How would logs have been driven down (meaning floated down by water) to Trenton starting at the Oxtongue River? --papageno (talk) 21:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See here for an explanation of how logs were transported overland between the two watersheds: https://www.muskokaregion.com/community-story/9533044-algonquin-to-trenton-an-ill-fated-attempt-to-save-a-lumber-legacy/ This is one more thing that should be cited and explained in the article... I intend to put some significant work into it eventually. Somatochlora (talk) 22:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: An incredible story. Thanks for clearing that up, Somatochlora.  --papageno (talk) 05:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driving logs down the Oxtongue River eventually to Trenton?