lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cartesian dualism

message: I would consider this article to be biased against Cartesian dualism.  It suggests that many later Cartesians did not come up with more reasonable solutions to the problem of mind/body interaction.  In a contemporary context, I would use a term like energy to describe the nature of mind.  “Mind is an energy that does not have to traverse space to have its effects [on the brain],” said Dallas Willard during a personal interview with him discussing this key philosophical issue.
:Agree with you about the bias.  But it might be a question whether these later dualist solutions you speak of are correctly described as Cartesian.  I think the more general term is substance dualism.  -Trovatore 18:25, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It also should probably be somehow clarified that when we say "Most modern philosophers are materialists", that is true, but it doesn't necessarily mean materialist in the sense of reductive physicalist that many people might assume—many, possibly most, modern philosophers are nonreductive physicalists, which is a rather subtle sort of materialism not entirely dissimilar from dualism in some respects. --Delirium 04:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As an aside, it might also be better to use "physicalism" instead of "materialism", as the latter in some contexts means something more specific. --Delirium 19:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

message: <From Cartesian Dualism (3rd paragraph)—For this reason and others, most professional philosophers and scientists have abandoned this view and prefer other accounts of the mental. For example, other accounts of the mind-body problem present competing philosophical positions and cognitive science is the generally accepted way of understanding the mental, which is based on the assumption that the mind is matter: the material brain.>
Kindly see Spinoza on Mind and Body and  Descartes' Error.
Yesselman 22:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Damasio Antonio Damasio] on Mind and Body
Talk:Griffon Bruxellois

message: It is not a pug, it's a Petit Brabançon. But It is definitely NOT the correct photo for a Griffon Bruxellois. This should be changed immediately.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.129.93.75 (talk) 21:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petit Brabançon 

message: Griffon sur le dessus d'un cheval? Pourquoi parlez-vous dans une teelle énigme, Bruxellois? Ne comprenez-vous pas que je suis simple d'esprit? Vive le Griffon de Bruxelles! (Griffon Le Bruxellois meurt à un âge avancé d dix-quinze)
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.241.238.85 (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Bruxellois Bruxellois, quoi la zut est un griffon!?! VIVE LE BRUXELLOIS BRUXELLOIS BRUXELLOIS GRIFFON!!!

message: Hi there. I noticed references 1-8, 14 are missing citation information such as date of retrieval, source, and author. Please correct, thanks! --Vivian079 (talk) 18:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Protestantism in Bhutan

message: why is this an article of major importance? Bhutan's population has a population of less than 10,000 Christians accounting for around 0.005% of the population.
:Agreed.  I've added a notability flag based on that fact alone.Alan 18:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article is true it is of plenty of importance compared with half the other articles. Varsdra 00:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To quote Wikipedia's official policy "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth." (per WP:V). Please read the WP:Verifiability page before removing further tags from the article. -- MarcoTolo 23:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lagotto Romagnolo

message: The lead section is precise and to the point. It has a good intro but it does mention something that is not mentioned anywhere else in the article. The content is relevant but it does not mention information that I know off the top of my head. The tone is neutral, fair, and impartial. It does not try to sway anyone's opinion in any way but to be fair there is not really any opinions that could be swayed in this topic.
Most of the links work but one is just to an ISBN that I can't find.
The ratings are start class and mid class. It is in two projects: WikiProject Dogs and WikiProject Italy.  Jjm2121 (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation 

message: significant attention will likely come to this page as a Lagotto just won best in show in this year's Crufts dog competition (march 12 2023). SDRWIKI (talk) 20:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  just won Crufts!
Talk:Competitive Edge Motorsports

message: Stuart Kirby was replaced by Bryan Reffner for the Phoenix race, and possibly permanately. Should this be added to the article. Normally I would, but this seems to be too speculative for a WikiPedia article. --D-Day 20:37, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuart Kirby 

message: Did Front Row Motorsports buy this team?  The reason I ask because in FRM's wikiarticle, it says has the car history listed as their car #61 history. --JAYMEDINC 05:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: CEM ran the #51. This team simply shut down and auctioned off its equipment. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by D-Day (talk • contribs) 12:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Front Row Motorsports
Talk:Manchester Terrier

message: This breed is classed in Britain as a VNB - a breed which originated in the UK but now has registration numbers with the Kennel Club of less then 300 puppies per year.  
I'm a Canadian teenager on a gap year before Uni and I'm really interested in this.  Would anyone like a VNB paragraph/link on this page?  I can write it, but am ignorant about formatting etc.  Plus, I'm trying to put together a whole collection on all 29 breeds on this list, including history and so on, using Wikipedia as one of my many sources.  If you can help, or are interested at all, please contact me either on my talk page or at green_ied_dragon@hotmail.com   
--The Wizard of Magicland 19:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vulnerable Native Breed 

message: The "In England" part of the history section appears to have been copied verbatim from http://members.tripod.com/manterrj/welcome.htm If this is the case, it is a violation of copyright and the section needs to to completely rewitten as soon as possible. Richerman (talk) 10:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation  

message: Plese, help me with translute this page to russian languge Saminmihail (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  translite to russian
Talk:Romanian Mioritic Shepherd Dog

message: I have removed text & photo just added; text is a possible copyright violation of dogbreedinfo site. If you are the author of the material and give permission for the text to be used under GFDL or public domain licensing, please state so here. Likewise, if you're the creator of the photo, please state so on the photo page.  Thanks. Elf | Talk 17:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: possible copyright violation

message: added image of Mioritic on to article.. not sure if this is the same photo prevously removed or not, however it does currently state on the photo page that the image was self-made by uploader.. --Ltshears (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo 

message: I have now twice removed links from this page to private kennels. External links to private businesses that an article is not about are generally disallowed on Wikipedia, as they tend to be used for advertising. Please read our external links policy , especially the following in the section about what is not allowed to be linked:
 * Links mainly intended to promote a website. See External link spamming.
 * Links to web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising. 
and do not add links to businesses/kennels to this page (or similar pages) again. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 15:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kennel links 

message: I'm no wikipedia editor, but IME as an owner of such a dog "Because of this dog's ability to bond strongly with his master, training should only be started once the Mioritic puppy is already accustomed to the owner/trainer." would be closer to the truth if it would be rephrased as "Because of this dog's tendency to bond strongly with his master and his master's family, training should only be started once the Mioritic puppy has become attached to its master, and should always be done with participation of its master." It might also be useful to state that given their independent nature, their strong (but not necessarily dominant) personality and their history of a working breed, they're not very keen on mindless games such as ball fetching, or jumping over obstacles, but like play fighting a lot (they can easily keep up play fighting for hours, and you don't need any other fitness training, if you are up to it), which is why the need to be taught early on (at 3-4 months of age already) how strong they are allowed to bite in play fights with humans, and what the signals for play fighting being allowed are, or they'll seem aggressive to most people not knowing them, and wound people without intention.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.118.0.47 (talk) 18:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe a better formulation
Talk:Norfolk Terrier

message: Would it be OK if I changed two of the pictures of the Norfolk Terriers (Norfolk Terrier George Gordon.jpg & Norfolk Terrier George Gordon 3.jpg) to File:Charmonty norfolkterrier.jpg and to File:Kofi in tartan 1.jpg? They were continuously added by a user named Edgyedgy during September & October 2016, and were twice removed, only to be replaced by his images once again. 
I've already changed the infobox's picture to File:Norfolk terrier CAC.jpg because it is a much better picture than an unclear purple-brown head looking to the yellow-purple sky. Also, File:Norfolk Terrier George Gordon.jpg does not represent a Norfolk Terrier with an erect head and tail, unlike the original picture. None of the current pictures represent a Black & Tan 'Terrier, either, unlike the past. 
Orlando the Cat (talk) 01:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing 2 pictures 

message: The term "Gypsy" is an obsolete catch-all term now widely considered to be pejorative. I replaced it with Romani as it is more consistent given the name of the article to which it links. Matuko (talk) 04:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romani
Talk:Olde English Bulldogge

message: : New photos have been added to the list of Olde English Bulldogge photos as requested.  I have also added a couple of new referances to the reference section of the main article and replaced the picture with one that displays the dogs whole body.  I hope I didn't over step my boundries? Don Pelon 03:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. Hafspajen (talk) 20:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: New Olde English Bulldogge Photos

message: A discussion has begun at Leavitt Bulldog#Notability again which may be of interest to some readers here. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leavitt Bulldog discussion 

message: Shouldn't we put https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olde_English_Bulldogge#/media/File:UKC_Olde_English_Bulldogge_Male.jpg in the infobox? --FeldBum (talk) 15:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos, Yet Again 

message: , do you think it is appropriate to copy and paste verbatim the entire contents of the last version of the Leavitt Bulldog page into this page? The merger decision at AfD established consensus that the Leavitt Bulldog is no more than a line of the Olde English Bulldogge. Additionally, I have left a message for you at Blue Paul Terrier talk page.  Kind regards, Cavalryman V31 (talk) 11:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , I see you have been active elsewhere on Wikipedia, do you agree that the Leavitt Bulldog section should be significantly amended and reduced so as not to give it too much WP:WEIGHT in an article about the OEB? Cavalryman V31 (talk) 06:46, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged content from Leavitt Bulldog
Talk:Portuguese Podengo

message: The FCI info for this breed was incomplete, and I could not find it on the fci website - there are other warren dogs, but not this one - so I removed the info.    - Trysha (talk) 23:06, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link that was originally on this page for FCI gave the group, section, and breed number, so I went to the site you gave intending to (a) look in that group and section, and if not there, (b) search for the breed number, and if not there, (c) search for "podeng". As it turns out, all of those methods would have found the breed there.  Elf | Talk 00:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FCI info 

message: Podengo page contributors, please be careful not to break existing links.  I have fixed organization links after the last 3 updates.  agilepod 30 August 2011  —Preceding undated comment added 17:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality Control 

message: There are two AKC standards (one for the Portuguese Podengo Pequeno and one for the Medio/Grande) for this breed, but I was unable to add both. Someone who is more capable than me could probably fix that? --Canarian (talk) 17:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two AKC standards
Talk:Rajapalayam dog

message: I really doubt this. If someone can't come up with a cite that supports it then I'm going to remove it. It just seems to me like Indian dog breeders trying to lend validity to their mutts. --TKK bark ! 13:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 
Talk:Noël Alexandre

message: Created as part of Wikipedia:1911 Encyclopedia topics. Paul 17:45, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Brian Corridan

message: After closing, User:Radiant! wrote:
: Actually, the result was to redirect the article, and consensus below obviously supports that. Radiant_>|< 15:48, September 4, 2005 (UTC
This is clearly false; only a small number of those in the discussion favored a redirect. --Tony SidawayTalk 17:50, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Vishnu Sharma

message: This information seems to be worng. Author of Panchatantra is Vishnugupt more familiarly known as Chanakya or Kautilya.
:No. Kautilya was the author of Arthasastra. Meursault2004 19:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs clean up. Meursault2004 15:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Vishnu Sharma is a much more common spelling. I think the naming of this article was an unintentional error, since श is ś, which is definitely Sh and not S. --Hunnjazal (talk) 00:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving article

message: was the name of the author of Panchatantra > Kalila wa Dimne (Kelile ve Dimne) in Turkish sources... (This name came from Bidpai < Vidya-pati) Böri (talk) 09:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beydebâ 

message: in the introductory sentence, "an Indian scholar and author who have written" (which I wasn't able to edit), should read "an Indian scholar and author who wrote..." Stjohn1970 (talk) 07:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, you are correct.  Done —C.Fred (talk) 14:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor error
Talk:Assumption

message: Can someone give an example?
:Example: "Don't buy that or else you won't have enough money!" The person is assuming that he doesn't have enough money to pay for it.
::That is not necessarily an assumption though, if the person stating it knows how much money the person has, the cost of the item, and how much the person needs for some other purpose. Tyciol (talk) 06:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Example

message: Could someone explain the difference here? Tyciol (talk) 06:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Versus [[presumption]]

message: I think this page might need to be split between its bottom-half, which is actually a disambiguation, and the its top half, which is more like a WP:CONCEPTDAB. I'll have to look for good sources first, because most logic books do not define "assumption". As for the synonymy with presupposition in pragmatics I used this as ref. But I see that other pragmatics books define presupposition as an unstated assumption. So it's pretty messy. Tijfo098 (talk) 06:09, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed on the split, if the concept can be article-fied. The top half seemed more dictionary-like, with distinct definitions. If any of those concepts can be article-fied, they should probably go to Assumption (theology), Assumption (logic), etc. -- I'm assuming none of them would be the primary topic. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hrm, hrm
Talk:List of parliaments of the United Kingdom

message: The numbering of parliaments was queried in Talk:Parliament_of_the_United_Kingdom#Contradiction.  It seems to me the first was in 1801 and the second in 1802.  References there^  --Cavrdg 18:35, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're right. I checked this today in the Parliamentary debates of the House of Commons. The First Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland met in 1801, comprising of all those elected to the Parliament of Great Britain in 1796 and 100 of the 300 MPs elected to the Parliament of Ireland in 1797. --WóCoill 11:51, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong numbering?

message: This discussion about the numbering seems to indicate that we the editors have just started at the beginning and counted up.  Doesn't that make it original research.  Surely we need to refer to some objective source for the numbering system ?  -- Beardo 22:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the official numbering, although a little obscure.  See, for example.  Morwen - Talk 12:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who uses the numbering 

message: I propose that List of United Kingdom general elections should be merged into List of Parliaments of the United Kingdom.  I agree with the poster of 'This page and United Kingdom general elections' that the two cover largely the same ground. I feel that the merged article should be here for consistency with List of Parliaments of England, List of Parliaments of Great Britain and List of Parliaments of Ireland. Alekksandr (talk) 19:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Could someone who is better at tables than I am please edit this to reflect the fact that Parliaments did not begin and end with the reign of that monarch (for example the current Parliament began under Elizabeth II, and the 40th Parliament began under her father, etc. etc.)
Thank you. OGBC1992 (talk) 08:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap between reigns
Talk:Arthur Hailey

message: Unless or until someone wants to write an article about the Arthur Hailey novel named Strong Medicine, I'm un-wl'ing the link here because the Strong Medicine page currently discusses the Lifetime TV show with that name. There's no point in dab'ing until there are actually two articles for a given subject name. Keith D. Tyler ¶ 18:55, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
I am undoing the change which adds "Liner" in the bibliography. I can't find any evidence for such a novel authored by Arthur Hailey. --RohanDhruva (talk) 23:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looks as though a whole lot has been removed. This section skips straight to his last novel. Must be masses more detail from his long career  -  the war service, who was his first wife, etc. 81.157.67.29 (talk) 18:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a brief check through the history. Can't see any major removals of content. It probably wasn't ever in there in the first place. Do feel free to add it. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rather short biography section 

message: Sheila Hailey published I Married a Best Seller: My Life with Arthur Hailey, which was not always complimentary...
:It might be worth adding that he approved it with good grace. Valetude (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife's memoirs
Talk:Deepa Fernandes

message: If anyone has more detailed information feel free to add. I just tried to get the page started. Jersey Devil 18:56, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Honningsvåg

message: According to my knowledge of Norwegian, Honningsvåg means "honey wave". Is this correct, and if so, why is it named so? — JIP | Talk 19:07, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is right, that honning means "honey", but in this case the word is changed during lingvistic history, probably from horn, that in Norwegean can mean a steep mountain top. The last part of Honningsvåg is not the female word, that means "wave", but the male word, that means "bay". --89.107.212.106 18:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Too bad it's of such a bad quality due to compression artifacts, otherwise it would've been one of Wikipedia's most beautiful photos, at least in my opinion. Does anyone have a better version? Zonder (talk) 15:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Winter sky photo

message: Some times are given in this article. I'm not sure but I thought I arrived early in the morning and found nearly everything closed. Evenually I found a local bus which took me to North Cape. Maybe I came from the north and maybe out of season but I suspect times can vary and may be misleading?? 
Tchumbley (talk) 23:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hurtigruten Arrival Times 

message: Honningsvåg is not on mainland Norway but on the island of Magerøya, so cannot be the most northerly city/town on mainland Norway!  This is just a label to attract tourists and their money.
Having said that it is still well worth a visit!  Instead of going to Nordkapp/North Cape I suggest driving into the neighbouring mountains for spectacular views and unique flora well away from the mass of tourists that can appear as if from nowhere but usually by cruise ship and bus.
193.234.185.70 (talk) 16:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mainland Norway?
Talk:Ken Langone

message: I'm working on expanding this stub, so please let me know if you have any info on Ken Langone. GinaDana 19:12, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Saw Kenneth Langone's profile on facesofphilanthropy.com, noticed he didn't have a philanthropy section on his Wiki page, so I added one. Moved the first sentence of the Personal life section into the bottom of mine, where it fit better. Sir. Somerset (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Philanthropy

message: Langone's company is not consistent with denomination.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 17:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 