lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jaume Balagueró

message: Hello. The article says the Catalan pronunciation of Jaume Balaguero is [ˈʒawme βalaɣeˈɾo]. Yet the pronunciation in the Catalan variety from Lleida would be [ˈdʒawme βalaɣeˈɾo], with an initial affricate, instead of a fricative. The Central Catalan pronunciation of it would be [ˈʒawme βələɣəˈɾo], with the schwa sound in unstressed syllables. I'm going to modify the transcription to make it fit with the local pronunciation. Feel free to discuss and reverse my changes, should I be missing something. Ryba g (talk) 11:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Catalan pronunciation
Talk:Larry O'Brien

message: Why doesn't this come up for "Lawrence O'Brien"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.104.102.82 (talk) 20:35, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why 

message: I'm a bit concerned that the article may be read to imply that the Basketball Hall of Fame is in Springfield because it was O'Brien's home town. The Hall of Fame is there because it's where basketball was invented. It predates O'Brien's connection to basketball. The fact that it's O'Brien's home town is purely coincidental. Pdchapin (talk) 14:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Basketball Hall of Fame

message: Why is there no mention of the fact that he was Hubert Humphrey's campaign manager during the 1968 Presidential race? Do I have the right guy? Was he still serving as Postmaster General, or did he resign to manage the campaign? —MiguelMunoz (talk) 06:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humphrey Campaign
Talk:Geum triflorum

message: I found a potential source of information about the uses of plants like Geum triflorum. http://naeb.brit.org/uses/search/?string=Geum+triflorum  However, I am not sure if the information is reliable enough to be used in Wikipeda. Opinions? MtBotany (talk) 23:06, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses 

message: In my recent revision I did not change out the photo in the species box. I strongly considered using the photograph currently in the gallery with the caption "Prairie smoke (Geum triflorum) on Olympic National Forest Mount Townsend Trail". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geum_triflorum#/media/File:Geum_triflorum_var._campanulatum_on_Olympic_National_Forest_Mount_Townsend_Trail_(4837197389).jpg
My worry is that the leaves of another plant in the background may make it a less than perfect illustration, even though it is otherwise a great photograph. I would appreciate opinions on this. MtBotany (talk) 23:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You could add it as a second photo in the speciesbox (using  and ), and caption it as a photo of the inflorescence (or you could add it somewhere else in the article). I don't think it should replace the current photo. Presence of another plant in a photo isn't necessarily a problem, but in this case it's not clear that the leaves are not part of the Geum triflorum, which has some potential to mislead; if the photographer had zoomed out more and it was obvious that the leaves were connected to a different plant it wouldn't be misleading. Plantdrew (talk) 16:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your advice, @Plantdrew. I was leaning toward your position and I'm convinced. I'm leaving the picture in the gallery. MtBotany (talk) 00:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species Box Photo
Talk:List of trading losses

message: I noticed that the column USD Amount lost was sorting strangely in my client. Entries with an extra digit of precision were randomly inserted in the sequence out of order, producing the same BS whether sorted up or down. The pattern is weird, and unlike anything I've seen in three decades of computer science. It's not ASCII sort in either forward or reverse alignment. It's not numeric sort for floating point, and it's not integer sort after ignoring the digits preceding the decimal point. It doesn't appear to be a secondary key injecting nonsense. 
 !data-sort-type="currency"|2007 USD Amount Lost — better, but still got 0.296 out of order with 0.30
 !data-sort-type="number"|2007 USD Amount Lost — I forget now, but not correct 
 !data-sort-type="text"|2007 USD Amount Lost — mostly the same as before 
One time I implemented a binary tree thinking that strcmp(a,b) returned Boolean values corresponding to either a~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wacky sorting
Talk:Palonosetron

message: "...it may be better than granisetron" is vague.  The word 'better' should be replaced with more detailed adjectives, such as 'effective', 'safe', 'more convenient', etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheddar3210 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Better" can be better as a different word :)
Talk:Vint

message: Acoording to Maalari, there is some addition to skruuvi called loviisa. The addition is so bad that Maalari does not explain what it is in his book. Does anyone have any idea what a loviisa is (in addition to being a city in Finland?)Punainen Nörtti 06:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Grewia asiatica

message: I don't see anybody selling it now. In my childhood (20 yrs ago) a hawker used to come almost to the streets and our neighborhood everyday... what happened? 61.16.239.83 (talk) 10:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to buy in NCR, India 

message: I have removed the following lines from the article:
:The fruits allay thirst and burning sensations, and can reduce inflammations.
:The unripe fruits remove vata, kapha and biliousness.
:it is good for liver.also useful in jaundice due to continuous and over consumption of alcohol and uses of hot and spicy items. ghabrahat(uneasiness)due to heat .30 ml of juice with cold water ends uneasiness within minutes for liver cure some days.
The first line has had a "citation needed" tag for seven years. The second contains a disambiguation link with no apparent solution, and an obviously incorrect link to a religious text. The third is medical advice that should really be accompanied by a source. bd2412 T 15:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced medical advice removed.
Talk:Snapshot aesthetic

message: This is pretty scathing as currently written.
yeah I agree this needs to be a lot more balanced. Why do people bother writing articles in this derogatory unbalanced style - they  should save it for some crap blog that no one reads where they can happily bemoan everything and anything. Will try and clean up st some point this month though if anyone else wants to clean up fine. 3tmx 23:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Latin American Boom

message: I've changed "major exponents" of the Boom to "major figures," as this seems more accurate. (Did the writers necessarily "expound" the Boom, or were they simply identified (by others) as being its representative figures?) I'm not dead set against "exponents" if someone makes a good case for it. 850 C (talk) 22:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edit looks fine to me. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 23:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Exponents or figures
Talk:Kalahari Meerkat Project

message: If you check the FKMP site, there's a store now. Should this be in the article? Cruise meerkat (talk) 02:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll take a look at it, but can be part of an over all topic on its website offerings. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

text: There ya go...added a whole section on the Friends :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Store 
Talk:Frisco Jones and Felicia Cummings

message: *I am currently working on improving all of the soap couple articles on Wikipedia. While I, of course, understand the fact that articles on Wikipedia shouldn't only provide plot summaries, all of these soap opera couple articles will be worked on and formatted to fit Wikipedia policy, which is why Wikipedia: WikiProject Soap Operas exists, and is why I ask other editors to hold off on nominating these soap opera couple articles for deletion. To go around and delete these soap opera popular and or supercouple articles is not the answer. Clean-up is. I will get around to fixing up this article, in which will be soon. Flyer22 22:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do these two really not have separate articles? Is anyone opposed to that? Or at least adding them individually to the character lists by decade? Thanks! Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 01:22, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate articles?
Talk:Benji (1974 film)

message: This is all there is in Wikipedia for an article about Benji? Unreal...he should have been a foul-mouthed cartoon character apparently to merit a decent write-up  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.22.192 (talk) 03:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is all? 

message: I'll admit I've never seen the movie, but I think "The rest is for you to see." is a bit "commercial" for a Wikipedia entry.Pharkryi (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: - Good eye. It looks like someone claiming to be the film's director trimmed a portion of the plot, ostensibly to remove spoiler content (contravening WP:SPOILER) and instead left the cutesy "the rest is for you to see" statement along with some additional fluffy content. I have removed the offending content. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. The director may have added some extra fluff too, so double check for that.Pharkryi (talk) 01:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete plot summary? 

message: "A series of five films" -- none of which have Wiki articles, apparently.  So un-notable that not even their titles are listed here? 104.153.40.58 (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequels
Talk:Pedicel (botany)

message: "It is the branches or stalks that hold each flower in an inflorescence that contains more than one flower."
So a pedicel is not just a flower attached to a single stem but also those that are attached to branches or stalks?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.225.200.133 (talk) 22:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Shim Eun-ha

message: Sadly, I just clicked "random article" and was faced with this, so I don't know anything about it, but it doesn't seem very well written. I mean, come on, are we gonna put somebody's favourite food in Wikipedia? If anyone knows enough about this person, it would be nice to see a rewrite about this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.205.30 (talk) 19:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Very Well Written
Talk:Mohanatarangini

message: 'Karnataka Janajeevana' by Betgeri Krishnasharma (under the 1rst World Kannada Meet publication, 1981) has a very good writeup on Kanakadasa and Mohanatarangini. Plz try to include it.
Tej smiles (talk) 20:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  One more reference
Talk:AMC Spirit

message: Quarter-mile time of 13.4 for the 304? Not in factory trim. Maybe 16.4. AMCKen (talk) 19:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: AMX Version
Talk:Rambler American

message: Are the wheels on the American Ramber the right wheels for that model?
I've seen wheels of that type on similar-vintage AMC Javelins.  Did they use the same wheels for both, or are the wheels on the Rambler wrong?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.226.247.101 (talk) 21:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheels on 1967 American Rambler
Talk:Sutton Coldfield railway station

message: I've removed the trivia section from this article. As Pigsonthewing rightly pointed out in his tag, trivia sections are not encouraged in WP. In this case, it would be difficult to integrate the trivia into the rest of the article, and it is unlikely to be verifiable anyway. Feel free to revert if anyone can come up with a better solution. – Tivedshambo (talk) 06:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:Cogers

message: The claim that this is "oldest speaking gathering of any kind after the United Kingdom Parliament" seems dubious.  The Tynwald, the Althing, the Løgting and the Grand and General Council all claim to be older than the Parliament of the UK.  Among non-legislative bodies, the Académie française and Royal Society are also older.  Is there any reliable, independent source for this claim?  Groomtech (talk) 11:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that the entry has been amended, but I wanted to agree that the original claim was incorrect.  Having said that, "speaking gathering" is uselessly ambiguous.  As far as I know it is, however, the oldest extant affinity group whose purpose is debate/discussion. Bricology (talk) 19:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest speaking gathering of any kind
Talk:Ipomoea cordatotriloba

message: The article was written for a particular variety, which is just found in Texas.  Now that it was renamed to the species name, some of the assertions are no longer true (the species is found in many areas of the southern US, for example).  This is partly my fault - I didn't take the time to figure out how to put the variety into the taxobox, so I just didn't bother.
Either we could just take an axe to everything which isn't sourced (which is pretty much the whole article except the ranges and a little bit about the names), or we could rename the article to the variety name. Or I guess we could put the unsourced information into a section about the Texas variety, although I don't really know what applies to the whole species and what applies just to that variety. Kingdon 16:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the Texas variety into its own section. Kingdon 01:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species versus variety
Talk:Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society

message: There is no separate indication of notability here. Why should this not be redirected to the organization? ··coelacan 07:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:List of theological journals for notification of a project to place all peer-reviewed theological journals on Wikipedia. StAnselm 07:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a fine project , but it will only work if you put in more information than this. Skimpy articles on unfamiliar subjects are very likely to get deleted, regardless of intrinsic worthiness. I'm going to answer more fully on that List talk page. The minimum information is the basic information from Ulrich's
 I'll explain in more detail. DGG 22:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: notability
Talk:Bahawalnagar

message: Bahawalnagar Press Club Reged Bahawalnagar is the oldest forum of working journalists in District Bahawalnagar. Mir Masood Ali was the first President and Murtaza Khan was General Secretary  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamamd Shahid Nazar (talk • contribs) 12:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bahawalnagar Press Club Bahawalnagar Reged. 

message: I would like to invite and request few other respectable editors (User:Mar4d & User:Smsarmad) to look at Bahawalnagar and Dera Ghazi Khan. In addition to the concerns expressed at User Talk: Muhammadshahzadkhan another concern is that Bahawalnagar and Dera Ghazi Khan is not spelled same in Saraiki as in Urdu or Punjabi. Not sure if this is the proper way to invite someone but don't want to start an edit war with this user myself. I reverted him for now but please keep these two pages in your watchlist. Sajjad Altaf (talk) 12:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Sajjad. There is an edit war (Saraiki vs Punjabi) going on a number of articles for a couple of months, most prominently between User:LanguageXpert, User:Bhural and their socks. And this issue seems related to this dispute after the IP editor 39.32.x.x (LanguageXpert sock) got involved. If time allows will look further into the matter tomorrow. -- SMS  Talk 17:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Edits
Talk:Shayari

message: I would have liked to include shayari of famous poets with references but I am seeing suspected self-made shayari included in article. If references are not given, I will remove poetry in this article. Also merger to article Urdu poetry is suggested. Thanks! Rāmā (talk) 23:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting merger to article [[Urdu poetry]] 

message: Theres a lot of self-made shayari included this in article and no refrences are given.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.43.68 (talk) 05:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  self-made shayari. 

message: * It is a very poor article and other thing is that it exsits already with name of Urdu poetry.
I take a look at this page,editors have suggested to remove this article.I am going to ask other
editors to review it again.I think it is realy blunder.It should be deleted. Ehsan Sehgal (talk) 21:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's amazing me,and a blunder
Talk:Park West, Dublin

message: Is Park West a suburb? Any opinion? 
Cherry Orchard and Parkwest railway station - note the spelling of Parkwest; not the original Business Park name. (Sarah777 08:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I certainly am no torch barer for the people you mentioned! And I'd agree that there are some issues (in the local Dublin context) that are so universally acknowledged that asking for citations seems silly. (And without endorsing it) I'd agree the Northside comment falls into that category. I guess where the references do become important is in a case like Citywest, where as a local familiar with the area since I can remember, I simply observe that it is regarded as a separate place, not Saggart, not Tallaght. And you have a different view. regards (Sarah777 07:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. While I would like to see a better way to determine such things, there are more important things to do for years to come, looking around even just Ireland in WP. Regards, and on with the work, Skir77 13:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Test poll
Talk:Concern for community (cooperatives)

message: Matching the assessment with the stub comment on the actual page.  This is indeed a stub and requires a lot more information.  Some information on the origin of this principle, including how it was a relatively late addition championed by Ian McPherson during his tenure at ICA, would be great (although that's not necessarily a NPOV comment since I'm a fellow canuck :).
Cyrie (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

message: See Talk:Rochdale Principles for reasons for deletion. --Zlerman (talk) 01:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion July 2, 2008
Talk:North American Students of Cooperation

message: The style guide recommends that only the first word of section headings be in upper case.  Please adjust the headings. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 23:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You could have fixed it yourself. – ukexpat (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading style 

message: Nothing in this article speaks to the notability of the subject as required by WP:CORP and there are no independent references. It also reads like a press release from the organisation itself.  – ukexpat (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article issues

message: Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 09:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to [[Wikipedia:Meetup/US_housing/December_2020|US Housing Edit-a-thon]]
Talk:Partially ordered group

message: It seems easy to verify that if an ordered group is finite, the order has to be equality; i.e., apart from this trivial case an ordered group is infinite. If we have a source we should add this.--Patrick 07:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Why is + being used for multiplication here? As far as I know, orderability has nothing to do with abelian groups, so this notation is just...wrong.
Unless someone can come up with a good reason I will change this notation to be multiplication, as is standard.
Farpov (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  + for multiplication? 

message: There's quite a lot of information behind partially ordered abelian groups that I would like to add. Should I add it to this page or create a new page? It may be distracting to have the abelian case here since the nonabelian case is quite different. Minimalrho (talk) 06:42, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon further inspection of this article, I'm concerned about the extent to which the abelian and non-abelian cases are confused. Is perforation a useful concept in the non-abelian case? Do the definitions of Riesz groups and Riesz interpolation property require being abelian or is it standard terminology for non-abelian groups? Minimalrho (talk) 07:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abelian case 

message: I suggest merging Integrally closed (Ordered group) into this article, because I think that Integrated closed will be explained in this article after explaining Archimedean. However, I think there is a way to write a short summary of Integrated closed in this article and not merge the articles.--SilverMatsu (talk) 07:13, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Support the merger proposal; there is no need to spin out separate articles on individual properties of ordered groups as long as this articles is so bare of content, and readers interested in those properties benefit from viewing the material in the context of other stronger or weaker properties. In this case, it makes very good sense to keep Archmedean and Integrally closed together. Felix QW (talk) 10:02, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for your comment. We need to polish the article more, but the merge is complete anyway. --SilverMatsu (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge (Integrally closed) ? 

message: Is there a source for this definition of archimedean?
I checked the definitions in [0] and [1] and both require the stated property only for 1 ≤ a < b.
This definition is not equivalent to the one from the article.
In any case, the definition has to require at least that a be non-negative.
[0] V. M. Kopytov and N. Ya. Medvedev, Right-ordered groups, Siberian School of Algebra and Logic, Consultants Bureau, 1996.
[1] Glass, A. M. W. (1999). Partially ordered groups 2A00:1398:4:A0F:8877:8440:3C36:92D5 (talk) 09:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense, i edited the definition to fit the references as you quote them. Thanks! jraimbau (talk) 06:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archimedean
Talk:Colin Morrison

message: I am not sure how best to make this comment so here goes. I have just come across the Colin Morrison entry into wikipedia and can see it is qualified by a comment. However, I know him as a director and chairman of companies I have been in and think this entry is actually accurate. I have even checked those companies mentioned on other sources. I think, if anything, there may be additional roles not included here. So that's my lot. Keep up the good work of being vigilant on wiki accuracy! MauriceD  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mauricedowns (talk • contribs) 08:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

message: This information about Colin Morrison is easily verified by the sources I have added and by reference to press realses on the www.natmags.co.uk site (see google of course).
I believe all the issues in this information about Colin Morrison are now satisfactorily resolved, with the sources all checking out.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morrisonc (talk • contribs) 10:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I flagged the article as having potential conflict of interest issues, if that's what you're referring to. If you are Colin Morrison, you should not be editing the Wikipedia article about yourself - see WP:COISELF. --McGeddon (talk) 08:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled