Talk:Pittsburgh Panthers men's basketball

message: This has recently come up as two separate editors have taken it upon themselves to change every mention of "Pitt" to "Pittsburgh" in an effort to "formalize" the articles...particularly the sports articles.  For now I have undone the revisions on the Pittsburgh Panther web page.  There is some history here that those from outside the Pittsburgh/Western PA area are probably unaware of.
1.  Since 1908 when the University of Pittsburgh changed its name from the Western University of Pennsylvania (until 1819 it was known as Pittsburgh Academy), those inside and outside of the university have referred to it as "Pitt".  Official documentation also self-refers to the university as "Pitt".  The quintessential history of the University by Alberts is called "Pitt" and the most referenced slogan and fight song is "Hail to Pitt".  Press releases involving the athletic teams (see here for the most recent :press release) refer to the teams as "Pitt". The web site url is www.pitt.edu. It is very similar to the University of Pennsylvania self-referring to itself as "Penn", Pennsylvania State University referring to itself as "Penn State", or the University of California-Berkley referring to itself as "Cal".  
2.  Locally and regionally, and even nationally, "Pitt" is used to differentiate the University's sports teams from the professional sports teams of Pittsburgh (the Steelers, Pirates and Penguins).  
3. Controversy struck in 1997 when new athletic director Steve Pederson took over a sagging athletic department at the university. In an effort to reinvigorate the sports programs by suggesting a fresh start, as well as to tie the Universities athletic teams closer the city in an attempt to revive flagging fan support among the city's non-alumni sports fans, Pederson introduced a new athletics logo, new blue and gold color scheme, and new uniforms.  Highlighting these changes was the replacement of the "script" Pitt logo (used to adorn facilities, uniforms, football helmets, and even used for non-athletic university  markings) with a logo that incorporated the word "Pittsburgh" in a torch-cut font.  Pederson also sent press releases to all local and national media outlets requesting that they no longer refer to the University as "Pitt", but as "Pittsburgh".  This met with outrage among some elements of the fan and alumni base, and was generally received by local and national media outlets with scorn, although they did generally comply.  A torch-cut "Pitt" logo was produced during this era and was meant to be used only for internal university markings and was seldom seen.  Upon the departure of Pederson to the University of Nebraska and the arrival of athletic director Jeff Long, the torch-cut Pittsburgh logo was gradually phased-out, and, to coincide with the hiring of Pitt alumni Dave Wannstedt as head football coach in late 2004, a new (yet retro) "block" Pitt logo was introduced thereby completely reversing the edicts of Pederson to replace "Pitt" with "Pittsburgh" in promotional and media fronts.  Interestingly, the change in blue and gold shades remains, as they have been adopted university-wide and Steve Pederson has since returned as AD at Pitt, although he promised there will be revisions of the current logo this time around.  However, the replacement of "Pitt" with "Pittsburgh" remains a very sensitive issue for many involved with the university, and unilateral conversion of "Pitt" to "Pittsburgh" may result in edit wars between alumni factions.
4. That said, the official name is the University of Pittsburgh and "Pittsburgh" is used to some extent, generally when referencing other academic criteria in the same sentence that would immediately signal that it was referring to the University, not the city.  For instance, when using "Pittsburgh" it is typically either proceeded with the words "University of" or followed by "Panthers", etc).  This holds true for administrators through alumni of the university.
These are the reasonings to leave "Pitt" alone, so to speak. I welcome further opinions but, again, direct you the usages of "Penn", "Penn State", and "Cal" by those respective universities. Just so its clear, I do believe the use of the word "Pittsburgh" when referring to Pitt is useful to reduce repetitiveness in the text. Please leave your opinions on this opinion. cp101p (talk) 23:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pitt vs Pittsburgh

message: Please leave your opinion on wether or not you believe the Oakland Zoo is notable:
An editor has nominated Oakland Zoo (cheering section), an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion.  We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").  
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at  and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).  
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.  Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD nomination of Oakland Zoo (cheering section)

message: There was a recent addition adding a section for early season tournaments starting in 2006. The issue is whether these are notable enough to highlight in their own section in this article that serves as an overview of the entire basketball program. Most of these tournaments aren't very very notable, and really, for completeness, you should include in season tournaments that go back to the at least the 1970s with the Steel Bowl days, if not earlier. Pitt has played in major preseason tournaments previously, like Maui and the preseason NIT, but those appearance predate the current timeline. However, a complete table would become a very large,  similar in size to the season-by-season table that has its own list article.  I see value in this information, but think it should be moved, probably to its own section in the  List of Pittsburgh Panthers men's basketball seasons.  Anyone have any comments or oppose moving it there? CrazyPaco (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The NCAA has instituted various rules in different eras regulating how teams may participate in exempt tournaments.  The most recent rule change is noted as the logical point in which the list in question begins.  If tournaments prior to this are added, it could be moved to a separate page.  Participation in higher profile events such as the NIT Season Tip-Off, 2K Sports Classic, and Maui Invitational is certainly notable, and relevant to the continued history of the program. Levance2 (talk) 01:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the emphasis of having a devoted section and table of the participation in these recent tournaments is a little undue given the 100+ year scope of the program that this article covers.  It is good information though, although not typically found in other program's articles. I think I'll get around to completing the table and moving it to the season-by-season article with a section hat note guiding readers there. The season-by-season article itself needs some clean-up as well, but I think that is a more natural place for this information.  CrazyPaco (talk) 04:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early season tournament section 

message: I would suggest arranging the History section by current conference affiliation, then broken down by coaching era.  "Initial Era", "Eastern Eight Era", "Initial Big East Era", and "Jamie Dixon Era" lack parallelism.  A new section should be added describing the announced future departure for the ACC. Levance2 (talk) 01:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that makes sense. Especially in the future, down the road in the ACC, I imagine the Big East era would fit together in one section better than it appeared when the article was originally written. If you want to try a rearrangement, go for it. CrazyPaco (talk) 04:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History hierarchy adjustment 

message: Billy Knight and Trent Johnson are both listed twice. I feel like they're probably just copy and paste errors, but there might be other players that belong in those boxes and I have no idea who, so I didn't want to just go in and edit out the duplicates in case anyone on here is better informed to fix those.
:Johnson was a mistake. Knight was drafted twice: by the NBA and ABA. It is a table of NBA/ABA drafts so Knight should be listed twice. I fixed the error and cleaned up the section a bit. CrazyPaco (talk) 15:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBA Players table 

message: Trying to find old pics from Seven Springs Basketball Camp that featured Pitt Players, Tom Richards and Kieth Starr, early 70’s. 24.144.186.26 (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old photographs