lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tolstoj quadrangle

message: Bwah? I'm curious, what needs expansion and what needs wikification? Those banners got put on pretty quickly and I'm not seeing anything obvious. Bryan Derksen 07:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion and wikification

message: Expanding your article as it is may not be necessary.  However, as you are publishing this to Wikipedia, not necessary academic publishing, you are opening this article up for editing and as a new article that may trigger professionals in the field to evaluate and expand this article, I have tagged it for those purposes.
Wikification is to put the article up to par.  Have you tried adding any pictures?  As this is an encyclopedia, it is also something on the internet as well.  As an average internet user only has an attention span of about 15-30 seconds, you may want to add any type of mixed media into this article as well.
I would also like to see the red links either be removed, fixed, or new articles be written.  Red links are eyesores. :-)
Last but not least, your sources section is very extensive (I like it).  However, can you please tag the specific sources you used with <ref>?  It makes it easier for users to evaluate your sources to the paragraph(s) you wrote.  Peer editing is key here on Wikipedia.  Also, it makes your reference section uniformly formatted.
Glad to be of help.  - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 17:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, you were probably wanting to use the  template or something similar instead of , then. I'll switch it over. Images for Mercury are pretty scanty since it was only ever visited by a single probe that did three flybys, I'd rather focus on the text for the time being. But as for the redlinks, those should definitely not be removed. Redlinks are good for the encyclopedia, they indicate subjects that still need to be written and ensure that they'll be properly linked up when articles eventually are created. See Wikipedia:Red link. Bryan Derksen (talk) 07:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, something like that... oh, by the way.  You're now 13th on the list.  Cheers!  - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 07:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which list? Not a revenge list, I hope. :) Bryan Derksen (talk) 09:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What I tagged
Talk:Soßmar

message: This article is a compressed version of the content on the website, founded by me. See also the german version.
D.O.A.BitH 20:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to prove that.  Please see the instructions at WP:DCP.  Thanks. -- But|seriously|folks  20:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi Rrburke,
couple of references are not available yet - but I'll work on it.
Here's my eMail to: permissions-en ATT wikimedia DOT org:
:Hi,
:
:I'm the founder of www.sossmar.de.
:I want to build a construction with a lot of culture and history, so I need the english version of "Soßmar"/"Sossmar". See also "Eyran Katsenelenbogen" and "Andrei Ivanovitch", which are the first article of mine.
:The german version of all written texts are from my mind, the translation into english and french are made by my wife.
:So there no copyright-violations, which are reported of "CorenSearchBot".
:Please stop this bot.
:
:For the additional examination of the identity of the author of http://www.sossmar.de/wissenswertes/32.html&langu=en - please reread it under this link: http://www.sossmar.de/Thanks/48.html - there you will recognize that it actually concerns with the user name D.O.A.BitH Hansjoerg G. Henker, the founder of www.sossmar.de!
:
:THANKS !!!
1st sent 13/10/07 22:53, second 16/10/07 15:31. So far I'd not receive an answer (holiday?)!
--D.O.A.BitH 14:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They will reply.  Sometimes it takes a few days. -- But|seriously|folks  19:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1st eMail I've sent 13/10/07 22:53, 2nd 16/10/07 15:31 and 3rd 09/11/07 12:11. The subject is wikipedia-article "Sossmar"/"Soßmar" and the receipient is permissions-en ATT wikimedia DOT org I still waiting... --D.O.A.BitH 15:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  references
Talk:Christianity and Judaism/Archive 5

message: I'd like to move this entire "Terminology" section over to the talk page of Glossary of Christian, Jewish, and Messianic terms.  Two reasons:
* its important history to that page
* this talk page is way too big - it currently only has november/december discussions and it is over 240K!  
*I don't know about anybody else but a page that big is a real problem when an edit conflict occurs - which it does fairly often on this busy page.
Any objections? Egfrank 22:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok by me. Just please leave a note here saying what's been moved. --agr 03:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Third-ed by me. ;) Alastair Haines 03:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology housekeeping question
File talk:VietnamchildsoldierEdit.jpg

message: Problème de neutralité ! Mise en scène de l'armée US. Le garçon est manifestement déguisé. Quelle est la valeur historique de cette image ? Quel est son intérêt ? Image de propagande dont WP devient le relais ? Deleterious ? Avertissement nécessaire ? PRA 08:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Peut-on dire que la photo a été truquée? Non, car on ne sait pas les circonstances dans laquelle elle a été prise Booksworm Sprechen-sie Koala? 15:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Attempt at translation: Neutrality problem! This is a staged scene by the US Army. The boy has clearly been dressed up. What is the historical significance of this image? Why is this boy interesting? Are propaganda images becoming the norm on Wikipedia? Should we delete it? Post some sort of notice? JHMM13(Disc) 16:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. Thank you for translation. Transfer to Commons.PRA 17:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

text: *Translation of my message: Can you really say that the photo is staged? No, we cannot, because we do not know truly under which circumstances it was taken Booksworm Sprechen-sie Koala? 20:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Lolwut?  Say we ban all WWII propaganda posters also? Sneakernets (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Staging ? Propaganda ?
Talk:Newcastle General Hospital

message: Uh... Monday morning... ?! do we get a date or are we just supposed to know "Monday"?  - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 08:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This afternoon I have started to make some updates to the page about Newcastle's General Hospital site. These changes will reflect the change of ownership of the site to Newcastle University and the emerging plans for the site's future as a health innovation neighbourhood. I must declare an interest: I am a member of University staff working in marketing-communications. My intention is to provide factual, up to date information about the site. 128.240.225.15 (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Begining updates - declaration of interest
Talk:Peabody, Massachusetts

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  11:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 

message: Somewhere along the line, the references for this have been lost or corrupted.  Can they be retrieved?
the sports section is incorrect, the most notable athletes are Bobby Carpenter and John Tudor.  http://www.salemnews.com/sports/x1150908803/The-Top-10-Most-Amazing-North-Shore-Sports-Accomplishments-of-the-Last-25-Years  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.49.144.140 (talk) 20:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc
Talk:Michael Guider

message: Hi folks.Hope you find the article useful. Feel free to add feedback.
Sardaka 08:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Per the quick-fail criteria of the GA process, any article that contains cleanup banners (such as the one at the top of the article currently) must be failed immediately, and does not require an in-depth review. Please remedy any issues brought up by such banners, and remove them before choosing to renominate. You may also wish to carefully read the GA criteria and check out a few GA-class examples in order to assess the article's readiness for renomination. If you feel this decision was in error, you may seek a reassessment. Thank you for your work so far, VanTucky talk 23:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: I find the timeline very hard to follow and conflicting.
In the "Imprisonment section": "He received a fixed term of six years and six months' imprisonment in 1999"
In the "Samantha Knight" section: "After a lengthy investigation, Guider was arrested and charged with Knight's murder on 22 February 2001 "
How can he be arrested if he was already in Jail by then??
MarmotteiNoZ 03:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messy timeline 

message: I know Guider has internet access, so he would have looked himself up for sure. If so, he would have seen this article, because it's the first thing that comes up if you do a search for Michael Guider. I think he might even have worked on it. In the section on Samantha Knight, someone added the statement: "...saying she regained consciousness and he then gave her a second dose because he did not want her to recognize him." I wonder if MG might have contributed this passage himself. There's no reference for it and I don't think I've seen it in the media. Chances are MG himself is the only person who would have that information.
Sardaka (talk) 08:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Guider
Talk:Tywyn

message: is given as  - this looks unclear to me - we don't normally write monophthongal /a/, and /i/ is the vowel of "see". Which vowels are they in terms of Wikipedia:IPA for English?  Is it to rhyme with "now" and "in"? Lfh (talk) 11:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tow-in (to rhyme, as you say, with Now in) is the usual pronunciation, though according to the phonetics of Welsh, I believe it should be correctly pronounced more like "tu win", with the first syllable as in "tub". The emphasis in both cases is on the first syllable. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 19:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK.  Well, we already have two Welsh pronunciations, so I'll just change the English IPA to rhyme with "now in".  Thanks. Lfh (talk) 20:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  English pronunciation 

message: There is a note at the start of the article that says it is written in British English, but this Talk page says Welsh English. We should chose one or the other. --Roly (talk) 08:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welsh or British English
Talk:Padala

message: i propose deletion because it is a spam. it is much better suited for WikiPilipinas instead. TheTechieGeek63 (talk) 07:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam

message: Some places Padala Community called as KAPU DORA in tribal districts of West/East Godavari distts. 223.185.64.228 (talk) 11:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PADALA SURNAME mostly belongs to KAPU CASTE. from West/East/Godavari districts & also from Vizag Srikakulam &, Vizianagaram distt. Of A. P.
Talk:DZRV-AM

message: Radio Veritas broadcasted the press conference of the military leaders of the Philippines that time, Juan Ponce Enrile and Fidel V. Ramos, both of whom defected to Corazon Aquino, as well as the heed of Cardinal Jaime Sin, archbishop of Manila that time,to the people to go near camps Aguinaldo and Crame, both located along Epifanio de los Santos Avenue. Can I put it there in the article? I think we must since it is part of the history of the radio station, which then affected the whole history of the Philippines. -Pika ten10 (talk) 05:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance in [[People Power Revolution]]. 
Talk:Parchís (group)

message: Content merged in from Parchis (group) per merge tag. 2 articles disagree on year the band broke up; es:wp says 1985. The Continuum encyclopedia of popular music of the world or  Encyclopedia of world pop music might have a ref for discographies etc. -- phoebe/(talk)  09:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: these kids really put out twenty full length albums in five years?? even assuming some repetition of songs, that's quite a lot ... they mustve been busy.  i only wonder if, like some children's music groups, they were a label into which kids were signed, meaning that there may have been more than just five of them even if there were only five public-facing members. thats just wild speculation though and im probably wrong. i can only say that it's true for modern children's music labels in the US, not 1980s Spain. —Soap— 17:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  thats a lot of songs
Talk:Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism

message: the double winged bird hos two wings  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.180.225 (talk) 07:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  the double winged bird 
Talk:Rolls-Royce 10 H.P.

message: This article was originally started as the Rolls-Royce 10 H.P..  Every other reference to the car I have looked at, including the Rolls-Royce website, calls it the 10 hp.  I notice it was changed to 10 hp in March 2006 but then changed back. I think it should be 10 hp. In support also is this extract from the Manual of Style: -
Periods and spaces
Acronyms and initialisms are generally not separated by full stops (periods) or blank spaces (GNP, NORAD, OBE, GmbH); many periods and spaces that were traditionally required have now dropped out of usage (PhD is preferred over Ph.D. and Ph. D.).
Malcolma 09:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Move it. Lewis Collard! (it's cold out there, but i'm telling you, i'm lonely) 09:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 10 H.P. or 10hp
Talk:Seven Mile Bridge Run

message: I feel badly that wikipedia seems to think this entry is an 'advertisement'. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hope I am not stepping on toes of organizers, this race is extremely exclusive in that a potential runner can only 'get in' by returning their registration form within about two days after the applications are mailed out. Entry into this event is coveted, and trust me, they do NOT need to advertise. For safety reasons, number of entries is limited, and the organizers probably turn away many thousands of entries due to the field's being filled. This article attempts to assist runners who genuinely want to make it into this race and run it legally (versus as a 'bandit', or someone who runs without registering). This below article is written unselfishly to assist runners who want to 'get in'. Also must add that the original poster did a BRILLIANT job of explaining the race and giving insight to it.
:This was not posted by me but probably a new user who didn't understand how WP works. I've moved it to the discussion page. --BHC 09:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nicolaus Copernicus Gesamtausgabe

message: What Wikipedia does not want you to know (by deleting the largest most important part of the history of the Nicolaus Copernicus Gesamtausgabe), see following section:
In the 19th century, Leopold Friedrich Prowe of Thorn, PrussiaLeopold Friedrich Prowe  Leopold Prowe, Thorn, Nicolaus Coppernicus] had already compiled a comprehensive biography and other works, using the archives of the places in Prussia where Copernicus had lived before Prowe. In 1943, for the 400th anniversary of his death, it had been planned to compile a Gesamtausgabe, in 9 volumes, the last two focussing on a new biography. Production of the compendium after volume 2 was published in 1949. Publication resumed in the 1970s, and then gained international momentum in the 1990s after the end of the Cold War allowed access to archives. 
    (71.137.193.88 (talk) 19:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Villanueva, Misamis Oriental

message: TODATE Villanueva has another industrial plant established located
in Brgy. Katipunan,Villanueva, Mis. Or. The new plant is CARGILL
PHILIPPINES, INC. it is Feed mill plant. This plant needs agriproducts such as corn kernels,dried cassava chips,copra meal,
limestone,fish meal, and etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.111.235.24 (talk) 04:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Villanueva, Misamis Oriental is one the most progressive town in the 2nd district 
Talk:Stranski–Krastanov growth

message: Whoever tagged this page for speedy deletion did so less than 5 minutes after I started writing it.  I have since updated the article and do not think it meets the criteria for deletion.  Please let me know if there are subsequent problems that I need to fix.Acarlso3 09:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry but what does 'n' stand for in the formula for the chemical potential? It is not made explicit, I think.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xikh (talk • contribs) 21:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wish I could give you an answer, but I've got no clue! You might get a quicker response on questions like this one from the reference desk, though; there will be more eyes on it, at least.  Good luck! -- Vary | Talk 21:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  chemical potential formula 

message: This article, though titled "Stranski-Krastanov growth", actually discusses Volmer-Weber and Frank-van der Merwe growth modes as well. Perhaps the article should be split, or renamed to something like "Crystal growth modes"? C3lticmatt (talk) 17:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey I agree with the article split. It seems like SK growth and the other three modes are all bunched up together. (Thetlt (talk) 09:56, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

text: I agree. Besides, there are not any dedicated articles for the other growth modes. (Nicdall (talk) 11:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started writing an article for the Van der Merwe growth. I agree that Stranski–Krastanov_growth#Modes_of_thin-film_growth should be split into a separate article, or become part of Thin film.Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 09:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: (I would) make it part of Thin film. Ponor (talk) 12:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split?
Talk:List of Everybody Loves Raymond episodes

message: There are a few episodes in season 6 which have gargantuan plot outlines - you might as well write out the episode's screenplay. Anyway, I don't have time right now, but I suggest they be reverted to a one-sentence summary like for the other episodes.
If nobody finds the time, I'll get around to it myself soon enough.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theradu123 (talk • contribs) 03:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 6 Episode Plot Outlines
Talk:Riley MPH

message: Pedant Mode on
However, the picture shown does not match the description of the car given.  I have seen such wings on cars labeled MPH but also far more elegant sweeping wings which match the description.  Were two models produced?  A quick google images search of "Riley MPH" will show the two forms. Look here - http://rileyrob.co.uk/specs/mph.htm78.148.200.167 (talk) 18:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Minister for Social Inclusion

message: This article contradicts itself. It states that the first SI minister was Mike Rann, but it also states that the first one was Julia Gillard.
It either has to be one or the other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.183.5 (talk) 06:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-Contradictory 

message: These were two different positions, in different governments. Wikidata already has them separated as  and . --Scott Davis Talk 04:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed split
Talk:Bosnian mujahideen

message: I have added a section with more in-depth discussion about size estimates (). I fixed some references and added some more sources that are frequently cited. I updated the lede and infobox accordingly. The lowest bound (500) is given by the CSIS (without citing any source) and the highest bound (up to 6,000) is given by Schwartz. CSIS claims that the preponderant estimates are 1,000-2,000 but that is simply not true. 1,000-2,000 is given by Thomas Hegghammer (cited by CSIS) and most other sources give estimates between 2,000 and 4,000. In any case, I have just explained estimates from all reliable sources that are frequently cited. --MarioGom (talk) 10:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, the 500 figure cited by CSIS (without attribution) in 2017 is more likely to correspond to the number of mujahideen who established their residence in Bosnia after the Dayton Agreement, rather than the peak size in 1995 pre-Dayton. This is just my guess, but I have not included it since there is no clear source. --MarioGom (talk) 10:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size estimates 

message: : I think links with Al Qaeda and ISIS should not be mixed. On the one hand, links with Al Qaeda were a major facet of mujahideen in Bosnia in the 1992-1995 period. On the other hand, ISIS did not even exist, and any possible link is of different nature. The former is about Al Qaeda involvement with mujahideen in the Bosnian War and the later about the relation of former mujahideen in Bosnia with ISIS. I think this would also apply to links with 9/11. Maybe the problem is that the article currently fails to discuss Al Qaeda in the "Bosnian War" section, too. --MarioGom (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't necessarily disagree, it was simply that one of those mentioned, was actually convicted for recruiting on behalf of ISIS, He needs to leave the section if we are going to have AQ only, the alleged links to which are much more numerous I believe.Pincrete (talk) 23:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Right. And it is actually in the "After the war" section. I think your last change is good, given the current scope of that section. --MarioGom (talk) 23:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixing links with Al Qaeda and ISIS
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-12-03/Arbitration series

message: :"Newyorkbrad and FT2 lead the elections by far, with 99% and 95% support, repeatedly."
I think you mean "respectively" there, not "repeatedly" - I hope you won't mind me being bold and changing it. I'm not sure if that's something that's frowned upon for Signpost articles, but if it is, I apologise. :) -- Schneelocke 11:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is what happens when I write at 3 in the morning :)  Please feel free to make any grammatical changes.  The only thing we frown upon are major edits/updates, because then many people don't read the updated version (because they only read once a week, and usually shortly after we publish).  Ral315 21:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong word? 

message: Why no mention of Ryan Postlethwaite? EVula // talk // ☯ // 03:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm considering tackling the effects of the Durova case on ArbCom in full, but if I do so, I want to do so a couple days in advance, so I can have it POV-checked.  I don't have a particularly strong opinion on the case, or on the ArbCom candidacies of some of its contributors, but since it's such a charged issue, I'd rather not put myself in a position where bias is presumed.  Case in point:  I wrote something a bit more substantial for Giano, but noted that it didn't fit well with the article, and would have received charges of bias from at least one side.  That's why I stuck to mainly a statistical analysis for this one.  Ral315 (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eh?