Talk:Cubana de Aviación

message: Got rid of "under Marxist rule" as neither Castro nor the regime were Marxist immediately after the Revolution. Also rephrased "had to stop" to "stopped". Was a bit POV. Dafyddyoung 10:03, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anybody have a source about the incident that allegedly happened on 28 March 2005, where "a Cubana A320 flying between Cuba and Canada lost its tail, but the plane was able to make a safe emergency landing in an American airport"?
On 05 March 2005, Air Transat flight 961 between Varadero, Cuba and Quebec City, Canada had the majority of the rudder surface detach during flight.  The aircraft returned to Varadero and landed without incident.  The incident aircraft was an Airbus A310.  I couldn't find any news reports about this Cubana A320, and this Air Transat incident happened within a relatively close timeframe, involving a flight between Cuba and Canada.
There is some information, including pictures... here and here. --Ncdoyle 15:32, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  28 March 2005 Incident 

message: instead of writting more about the airline history why copy and paste minor accidents that occur 40 years ago. is none sense. Bill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.8.137.254 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 25 August 2006
:While Wikipedia does not aim to be a collection of indiscriminate information, accidents with fatalities or substantial damage to an aircraft are usually considered notable. This is a broad subject in Wikipedia, see for instance Category:Aviation accidents and incidents and subcategories. I would suggest making a special entry with a List of Cubana de Aviación accidents and incidents if the present entry is too long. --Oden 20:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accidents of 40 years ago needed?

message: :Image:Cubana 75 anniversary logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cubana 75 anniversary logo.jpg

message: I removed an unsourced paragraph that accused Americans of sabotaging the airline's success. I think it needs to be rewritten neutrally, fact-checked (or have the sources of viewpoints cited) and sourced before the content can be added back to the article. wctaiwan (talk) 09:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is full of unsourced stuff, actually.--Jetstreamer Talk 10:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but that stood out as a clear example of POV-pushing that's partially true, at best. wctaiwan (talk) 11:11, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I meant that much more unsourced stuff should be wiped out.--Jetstreamer Talk 11:31, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed paragraph 

message: I've reverted the last edits made by  over the following concerns:
#Orders are not usually placed in the infobox;
#The sources provided (actually, it was the same source duplicated) do not mention that the airline has four An-148 on option. It just say the airline has six aircraft of the type on order, which was already stated in the article, and also properly sourced. Basically, their change failed to comply with WP:VERIFY;
#Messed fleet table up.
Please use this talk page for future discussions regarding the matter.--Jetstreamer Talk 18:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The source provided by the user says the airline has six An-158 on order, so I'll add this info as it was not included in the fleet table. I'm trying to find a better source confirming this. In the meantime, I'll re-add the reference provided by him/her.--Jetstreamer Talk 18:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: --Jetstreamer Talk 18:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last edits reverted 

message: I've reverted twice (, ) the unexplained removal of the entry including three An-148s the airline have on order. These edits were made by . The entry is properly sourced two times in the article: the first time in the ″History″ section, and the second time in the fleet table. I've warned the IP twice regarding the unexplained removal of content. So far, no response has been provided, neither here nor at their talk page.--Jetstreamer Talk 22:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained removal of An-148 order 

message: It was agreed not to include Skytrax-related information into airline articles, so I've removed this stuff from the lead three times so far (, , ). The edits in question were also unsourced, going against the verifiability policy. If you want to re-add this , please raise the matter at WT:AIRLINE, gain consensus for doing so, and re-add it backed by at least a reliable source.--Jetstreamer Talk 12:57, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skytrax information 

message: *
*
*
*
--Jetstreamer  02:01, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived references not used in the article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cubana de Aviación. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081220193322/http://www.cubana.cu:80/html/ingles/compania_e01.html to http://www.cubana.cu/html/ingles/compania_e01.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I updated and reformatted the fleet table per a recent reliable source. The existing information was dated August 2015. I also removed information on seat configurations, as the references were all at least four years old. Further, there is nothing wrong with indicating "at least 15" aircraft in the fleet. Wikipedia's content is based on reliable sources. Unless a different, more specific reliable source (not Planespotters.net or Airfleets.net) can be found, we work with what we have. Being an article on a Cuban airline, this is doubly difficult. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 05:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yet I don't think the seat configurations had to be removed, even when they were sourced with dated references.--Jetstreamer  13:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleet table reformatting 

message: Hello and good day. Today I made a slight change to the data of the above incident. There was 107 pax and 6 crew, not 104 and 9. Go to that page and incident at bottom of page and click on 972, redirects to wiki page. It says 107 pax and 6 crew. Go to Aviation Safety Network site and click about the incident. ASN is very reliable and they update and are current, so if you decide to change it to what I stated, change and use that as a source. Thank you for your time and have a good weekend.2601:581:8500:949C:92F:9B9C:48F8:D168 (talk) 18:17, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You cannot use another article to source your changes per WP:CIRCULAR: linking to articles is not sourcing. As for the ASN page, it is not used there as a source. Separately, you should have posted your comment at Talk:Cubana de Aviación accidents and incidents, not here..--Jetstreamer  21:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cubana de Aviacion accidents and incidents revert Cubana 972 

message: Hi, what does WP:V have to do with what I fixed in Cubana de Aviación and List of KLM destinations? Although it is spelled differently in the cited source, it remains verifiable. These are page titles, so the names are consistent across the wiki and objectively the most understandable. After your revert, in the case of List of KLM destinations, it is not consistent even within that page. The sources you refer to are old and therefore use outdated spelling. The absence of diacritics in the English-language sources is never a reason for its absence in wiki, if the page title uses it. Unless you have a better reason for your revert, I will restore my version. FromCzech (talk) 13:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographical names 

message: *
*
*
Sunnya343 (talk) 21:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived refs not used in the article