Talk:Business Operating System (software)

message: Apart from an old issue of an Atari magazine http://www.atarimagazines.com/startspe1/business.html , and its own website, global3000.com, I fail to find anything about this topic.  Is this a hoax?  Can someone please verify this?  -- Perfecto  02:45, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs verification 

message: I worked for a software house called WASP Software that produced vertical software (industry specific vs general) for printer, accountants, and solicitors (lawyers) running under the BOS system during the summer vacation before I started at University (1984) and a few occasions thereafter.
I have numerous fliers, magazine articles, dealer notes and a copy of BOS World from October 1986. Somewhere (probably my sister's attic) I have manuals for BOS too
There is pretty much nothing available on the web about the operating system - once Misys took it over, the emphasis was on the accounting suite of applications vs the portability offered by BOS...
I'll get round(!) to re-creating the entry with more background detail from the above sources - naturally my memory some 20 years later isn't as good as the fliers!
T.
P.S. BOS Software Limited get a mention in the Hansard which is the journal of the goings on at the (British) Houses of Parliament http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm198990/cmhansrd/1990-03-28/Writtens-1.html
ha ha ha ha  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.125.66.78 (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BOS is real 

message: BOS is real & I have the scars to prove it.  In 1986, I bought a property mgmt program (PMS by Portable Software Inc) which ran on BOS V? in native mode.  Even back then, BOS supported dumb terminals, concurrent processing & networking on a lowly IBM XT.  DOS couldn't even tie its own shoes.  I now run BOS V8.1 (aka Global System Manager 2000) as a DOS application under Windows 98.  While odd & rare, it is also: very stable, very fast, portable, compact.  It's powerful menu system (V6.1 is better then V8.1) makes it easy for new workers to learn & use.  As the owner & system manager, my learning curve was long & difficult because tech support ranges from non-existant to terrible.  Documentation is hard to read, written in a style PSI called "British Novelese".  BOS Finder is a useful database program.  BOS Writer works but is primitive.  I found BOS Planner useless & BOS Auto Clerk inscrutable.  Why continue to use BOS?  It runs endlessly & does everything I need (with some work-arounds).
Twslandlord 01:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BOS exists, but is rare in USA. 

message: For some reason the date of the restructure to MPPL etc. was set as 1991. This is ten years out. I worked at MPSL 1983-1985 when it was renamed as BOS. The content of the page is otherwise pretty accurate. The Speedbase 4GL is not mentioned however. The products are still extant, the dying embers of a great idea that lost its way but remerged with Java - destined for a similar fate - death at the hands of a de facto standard?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redsq01 (talk • contribs) 11:50, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Business Operating System (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140115164235/http://www.global3000.co.uk/comphist.html to http://www.global3000.co.uk/comphist.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: My understanding is that the  Intel 8080 and Motorola 6800 are microprocessors, not microcomputers. I have edited the lead accordingly, and made a couple of changes to associated Wikilinks. If any editor disagrees, feel free to revert. I've noticed a couple of other issues with this article, which I will try to deal with in due course. Mike Marchmont (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microprocessors are not the same as microcomputers