Talk:Blood test

message: Should this be merged with Reference ranges for common blood tests? Karada 22:34, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. I intened (when I started) that Rrfcbt would just be like an appendix of a textbook or something. But you're right, there is a lot of overlap between this page, rrfcbt and the page components of blood. There's no rush to fix it though. :-D T 01:53, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge to reference ranges 

message: The chem 7 results are usually presented in a 7 box diagram. It would help if we put up a picture of it and identify which squares correspond to which lab values (ie BUN, Glucose, K, etc). 
148.4.41.49 15:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chem 7 diagram 

message: Should this article mention common abbreviations used by doctors?  A few people are going to get here (I'm one of them) by searching for the letters their doctors have written on forms for blood tests.  EG: "UE, LV, F" - urea & electrolytes, Liver, but I have no idea what the F is for.  Maybe other people have come to Wikipedia via the same route. 82.33.46.11 22:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common abbreviations used by doctors? 

message: What types of illness can be identified by blood test and which can't?  Is it straightforward to group these types of illness? Pgr94 16:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What can a blood test achieve? 

message: It's been a while since I've ordered tests, but I've never heard of fasting before an STD test.
Arouet760 (talk) 01:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Add a citation to that statement. I've never heard of that either. --Rcej (talk) 01:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fasting for STD Testing?? 

message: Chem 7 redirects here. What does it include? Please write it down in the article. --84.137.13.82 (talk) 21:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHEM 7 

message: Currently the article reads:
Venipuncture is useful as it is a relatively non-invasive way to obtain cells
with the link to 'Invasiveness of surgical procedures' article, which reads:
A medical procedure is strictly defined as non-invasive when no break in the skin is created and there is no contact with the mucosa, or skin break, or internal body cavity beyond a natural or artificial body orifice
Venipuncture requires puncture of the skin, and is therefore an invasive procedure.  I know blood tests are viewed casually in most Western societies, however the risk of infection is real, and is a major motivator into classifying the procedure as invasive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.233.91.199 (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It says "relatively", which is true.  There is no risk of infection as long as single-use, disposable needles are used. Graham Colm (talk) 16:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invasive or non-invasive? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Blood test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110629044218/http://www.michigan.gov/careers/0,1607,7-170-46398-64537--,00.html to http://www.michigan.gov/careers/0,1607,7-170-46398-64537--,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:56, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibrinogen: 
"Normal FibrinoGen levels are about 1.5-3 g/L = 0.15% - 0.30%". 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serum_%28blood%29
"Serum: it is the blood plasma not including the fibrinogens".
So if one measures for example Plasma Ferritin and Serum Ferritin, they should be >99% the same?
But then I found this: http://www.hset.org/cms/Default.aspx?Page=4208
"Today, plasma is preferred for many, but not all, laboratory investigations because the constituents in plasma reflect better the PATHOLOGICAL situation of a patient than in serum".
I'm confused.
ee1518 (talk) 08:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plasma vs Serum when taking blood tests? 

message: This wikipedia article now says:
"On 30 October 2015, researchers at the VUMC Cancer Center Amsterdam reported developing a blood test that, from a single drop of blood, can diagnose cancer with a probability of 97%, and about 6-8% probability of a false diagnosis, in healthy patients".
When writing these kind of texts, it would be nice to include information is there a blood test a consumer can buy? And what is the Exact Name of the blood test if a consumer wants to Google or Bing it?
And now Wikipedia reads like this test can detect ANY kind of cancer: prostate, breast, melanoma... Could we be more specific?
ee1518 (talk) 08:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing the section in the introduction regarding the 'cancer blood test'. Having read through the article in question it does not state that cancer can be detected through a blood test, but rather was an experiment that looked at (and found) some merit in using blood platelets as a possible means of detecting the presence of cancer. Not only is this a treatment that is not available/not proven (and hence this is misleading information) it is not really relevant to the intro section either. If further evidence comes to light and screening of cancer through blood becomes routine then it may become more relevant and need to be included. Stingray Trainer (talk) 21:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancer Blood test 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Blood test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.michigan.gov/careers/0%2C1607%2C7-170-46398-64537--%2C00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110521010848/http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=49062§ionid=3510210 to http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=49062§ionid=3510210
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Please compare and dystinguish from term "Phlebotomy" and "phlebotomist" from blood sampl collection and blod test. Thank.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:409A:A50F:0:0:378:70AC (talk) 01:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please compare and distinguish from the term "Phlebotomy".  

message: If you give me permission to write a contact on the blood collection then I'll write on it.
My website :- www.erumeducation.xyz Tshams68 (talk) 09:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, that is against our policies. We do not allow advertising. Graham Beards (talk) 12:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blood collection 

message: These bloods once year Hbalc 2A02:C7F:8B72:3A00:450C:A91B:FEAB:9B54 (talk) 12:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hbalc