Talk:2005–06 NHL season

message: I'm new to WP and not a member of the project (yet), but I was wondering if there was a consensus on what to do about the playoffs.  Looking through past years, specifically 2002-03, it looks like the overall matchups for the playoffs were kept on the season page.  However, this year there is a link and article for the playoffs themselves (here).  Should we go ahead and stick with tradition and put the info on this page or do we want to keep it on a separate page and only add the info on the finals to this page?
If we keep it the way it is, I'd like to see the same depth of information on the new page as there is on the 2002-03 one.  Hell, I'd even volunteer to keep that page up to date if no one else wants it.  I just think that we should make a decision as a community, preferably before the playoffs start on Friday. Z4ns4tsu 17:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stanley Cup time

message: The top, what? 30 scoring leaders? (I didn't actually count them as there are way too many). Do we need that many? 10 is a nice round number. 15 isn't bad either. But we gotta have limits otherwise why don't we mention the top 100 or 300 players? I suggest we cap it at 15. No, I strongly suggest that we cap it at 15. Masterhatch 05:55, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I just wanted to include all the players with 5 points. Feel free to cut it shorter as the season winds on. -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:59, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  wow, way too much! 

message: I can't quite figure out the method used for the leading goaltenders. Shouldn't it be the goalie with the lowest goals against average first? Also, we can remove the "ties" column, can't we? As far as I understand it, there won't be any ties this year. Masterhatch 18:10, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated in the project season page, leading goaltenders are to be sorted by GAA.  Also, foaltenders only receive ties in the standings, IIRC, if the game goes into a shootout. kelvSYC 05:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading goaltenders 

message: I was looking at the rule change section and I thought that a better explination of the "tag-up offside" rule would help put a lot to those who don't follow hockey and understand the rules. If anyone has any objections I'll wait to see, if not, I'll change the section in a few days. anon 02:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea! I support it. By all means, go ahead and elaborate on the matter. Xtanstic 02:54, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rule Changes 

message: The play-off overtime rule isn't new, is it? --68.39.159.198 04:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't heard anything about it.  AFAIK, it's play 'til you drop, same as always. --Doogie2K 19:04, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

text: The play-offs are to remain the same, the shootout rules are for regular season only. --Maraulth 20:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overtime rule? 

message: It says that since Phoenix was supposed to get the All-Star Game this year, but its cancelled for the Olympics. So, the article claims it will be in 2009 instead. That don't seem true to me. I recall hearing that Montréal will get the 2009 All-Star Game, on account of its 100th anniversary, something the league is very wanting to do. Can we get any confirmation or refuttal for this? Kaiser matias 02:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I don't have any sources, but I remember reading somewhere a while back that Montreal was very interested in grabbing the All-Star Game, the World Juniors and other hockey related events (entry draft? unsure..) in order to hold this grand bunching of stuff in order to honor the 100th anniversary. I dunno if the league is fully behind it as you claim, but I definately know the Montreal organization would very much like it. Xtanstic 01:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  All-Star Game 

message: I added the new NHL Eastern and Western Conference logos in both English and French to the standings pages.  Hope you like it. NoseNuggets 1:06 AM US EST Feb 26 2006
:Cool, though I do think the names could have been a little more...intuitive (NHL East French Words, NHL West English Letter, that sort of thing).  I've tossed the English Words ones onto the appropriate conference articles.  Doogie2K 16:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New East, west logos up in English and French 

message: If anyone has questions about the clinching things, drop a line here.  It can get kinda confusing.
Side note: Can someone replace the Blackhawks logo in the standings?  It seems to have disappeared.
*Regarding Detriot's divison clinch: Detroit holds the 2nd tiebreaker over Nashville (cumilative points):
**Jan 6 - Det 3, @Nas 1
**Jan 23 - Nas 3, @Det 2
**Jan 24 - Nas 2, @Det 1 (OT)
**Feb 8 - @Det 6, Nas 0
**Feb 9 - Det 3, @Nas 2
**Mar 21 - Nas 3, @Det 2 (SO)
**Mar 30 - Det 4, @Nas 2
**Total: Detroit 10, Nashville 6
They play their season finale at Nashville on the 18th, but it is irrelevent as Nashville can't win the tiebreaker.  Yeah, it's probably being nitpicky about arguing over something so trivial, but still.
If Nashville won all of their remaining games and Detroit lost all of theirs, they would be tied at 110 points.  If, on the April 18th game Nashville beat Detroit 5-0, they would win the 2nd tiebreaker 11 to 10.  Or am I missing something?  -arctic gnome 05:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clinches and Eliminations 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.nhl.com/nhl/app?service=page&page=StandingsPage&type=CON#tieBreak
** In 2005–06 NHL season on 2011-05-26 01:52:47, 404 Not Found
** In 2005–06 NHL season on 2011-06-12 04:41:57, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: The Kings in the standings are shown in 8th even though they were 10th, is it possible someone can fix that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.15.25.104 (talk) 14:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standings 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2005–06 NHL season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120208075339/http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2636503729289931176 to https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2636503729289931176
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 2005–06 NHL season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5wg3IFhRI?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hockey-reference.com%2Fleagues%2FNHL_2006_skaters.html to http://www.hockey-reference.com/leagues/NHL_2006_skaters.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified