lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hebrew Bible

message: Such as the history of the bible itself, its physical history.
Where did the scripts come from? What are the oldest surviving pieces of it? etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.51.145 (talk) 17:59, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The physical history of the bible, if not completely taboo, is always shrouded in mist, because the biblical scholars are believers, and they want to hide the fact that we have no certified "original" version the sacred text. In another wikipedia article you can find the statement that the Leningrad codex, most ancient complete version of the Hebrew text, dates from around 1000 CE, but "was composed" 100 BCE. How do they know? 2A01:E34:EC0C:8370:1418:831F:CF13:A733 (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone is welcome to delete my previous comment. It contains a typo ("version OF the previous text"). And it is a general remark, which I indulged in, but cannot be used to improve the article. 2A01:E34:EC0C:8370:1418:831F:CF13:A733 (talk) 22:52, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that notation regarding the nature of the remark.  I'll suggest that the folks who study archeological origins of such things might be the best-informed sources on dates and composition speculation, as they'll have already studied comparative literature (such as it is?) of the subject time period. Jetpower (talk) 07:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information 

message: Proposed the topic at Talk:Rabbinic literature#"(Classical) Jewish Texts" article is needed, please continue there. Thanks, Arminden (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "(Classical) Jewish Texts" article is needed
Talk:Nusch Éluard

message: Well, Picasso painted her portrait.  See http://www.appealingart.com/portrait-de-nusch-eluard-by-pablo-picasso.html.  But, should this article be at Nusch or at Nusch Eluard? RickK 05:21, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article on wikipedia in French says she had a stroke and died at her mother-in-law's house, so not "collapsing in the street" as mentioned in this article. Not sure which one is correct. In doubt, I added the template "citation needed". 85.169.195.108 (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold

message: Please add the following paragraph underneath the subheading 'Fiction inspired by the duo'. Feel free to make changes or reject altogether:
The 1999 teen black comedy crime film "Duck! The Carbine High Massacre" was released just six months after Columbine. It is loosely based on the events of the massacre with two trench-coat wearing neo-nazi male protagonists Derwin and Derick, (played by William Hellfire and Joey Smack, respectively) who wish to kill students and susequently themselves after Derwin (who is supposedly meant to represent Eric Harris) is assaulted by jocks. Faithnomore1999 (talk) 14:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Shadow311 (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What kind of source would be sufficient? Faithnomore1999 (talk) 13:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See the explanation at MOS:POPCULT. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 December 2023 

message: The entry for Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold and the entry for the Columbine High School massacre both include sections that theorize the motive or rationale behind the massacre. Both entries overlap in their motive and rationale sections while also deviating and covering different information in different orders and at different weights.
It seems like a good way to handle this would be to choose which entry should be the source of truth for documenting theories about motive and rational. In my opinion, the Columbine High School massacre entry is the right place for lengthy documentation of theories about motives—motive is specifically about the massacre, not necessarily a biographical fact, and much of it is speculative (or debunked).
But I don't know about the standards for writing about murders / acts of terrorism vs. their perpetrators on Wikipedia, so I don't want to make any edits before putting this question to the talk page. Is there a way this is handled in other examples? TypingMadeSimple (talk) 00:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this entry redirect to the Columbine High School massacre entry (or vice versa) regarding 'motive' and 'rationale' sections?
Talk:Bromley Contingent

message: The following is from when the article was listed on VfD, which it no longer is
*Bromley Contingent.  "consituted the fashion avant garde of the early UK punk rock movement".  They constituted' the avant garde?  There was nobody else? RickK 05:21, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  From VfD 

message: KEEP THE BROMLEY CONTINGENT IN!!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.78.228 (talk) 09:33, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In 

message: A lot of the people listed were never considered part of the Bromley Contingent.  Jordan was much older, and although she was photographed with them in Westwood's Boutique and Clubs, she never really hung around with them outside of the Punk Scene.  If you include Jordan you might as well include Helen "of Troy" Lloyd Wellington, and Vivienne Westwood.  Simone Thomas dated a member of the Bromley Contingent, I want to say Simon Barker but I believe he's gay; she wasn't seen with them in the early days and vanished not long after the Bill Grundy interview.  Also I've never heard of Tony James being associated with the Bromely Contingent; he may have been friends with them, well definately Billy Idol, but being associated doesn't make him a member.  It's all really confusing of course; I mean somewhere there's a video of Caroline Coon interviewing Sid Vicious, Siouxsie Sioux, and Bertie Marshall that identifies Sid as a member.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.63.206.246 (talk) 04:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is a Mess 

message: Better be guided by who we see in Ray Stevenson’s various classic pix from 1976. Google finds plenty.  
https://100punksrule.wordpress.com/2013/03/17/the-bromley-contingent-77/
217.155.200.241 (talk) 21:53, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consult the photos 
Talk:Boldness

message: Some content has been moved to Forty-nine charismatic virtues. Peter Manchester 13:11, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: Having boldness is having the characteristic of strength or presence. Being able to command attention in the room, as if you are a celebrity or famous political figure such as the current US President Donald Trump.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon Pacilio (talk • contribs) 16:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boldness 

message: test message Seniorstudent1212 (talk) 16:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  test message 

message: Thanks for the feedback! It makes me feel very welcome! I am still learning the ropes, but I now know when to ask questions if I get confused!PeanutJr (talk) 03:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome.PeanutJr (talk) 03:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  thank you for your kind words
Talk:Creativity

message: — Assignment last updated by Jskalski (talk) 21:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Fall 2023

message: Creativity cannot be taught 41.114.201.188 (talk) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Why Creativity cannot be taught 41.114.201.188 (talk) 13:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Game of strategy

message: The game classification article lists games of skill and games of strategy as separate categories - but chess, checkers (draughts) and go are listed here as games of strategy but are also listed in the mind sport article, which is a sub-category of games of skill. So which category do they belong to ? I am confused. -- Gandalf61 13:24, Nov 25, 2003 (UTC)
*as i know mind sport games (chess, checkers (draughts) and go) may belong to both categories dependent how they are played. as solitaire (vs computer) or problem set games they tend to games of skill but are not quite; vs a second human player they are classical games of strategy .. i/someone should take some more reading about the classifications although they are propagated by Anderson/Moore and Brian Sutton-Smith i havent found unf more valuable/clear information about it than what i've written down yet. -- Ebricca 13:30, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Rock, Paper, Scissors is a game of chance. It does involve having some idea how your opponent plays, but the Nash equilibrium is for both players to play completely randomly. Seahen 23:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed so.  But this is a randomised strategy, as is setting the code in Mastermind and many optimal strategies in game theory, which then become a game of chance by playing the optimal strategy. Snakes and Ladders is a game of pure chance - there is nothing you can do to change the outcome, but Rock, Paper, Scissors actually requires a stategic decision to be random or to seek to exploit the other player's non-randomness.   --Henrygb 14:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fairness

message: Some content moved to Forty-nine charismatic virtues. Peter Manchester 13:33, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: I removed 
: * A form of preferences, as studied in behavioral economics
Having done so, i note that 
# Failing to mention fairness probably doesn't rule out a lk to an article, if some users who read the entry say "Oh, good; i didn't think of going straight there, but that's the kind of fairness i had in mind."
# The function of the non-lk portions of a Dab entry is not to be understood by users whose needs won't be advanced by seeing the article.
Nevertheless: 
# The article in fact uses the string "fair", in its 27kB, only once, only halfway thru, in the phrase fair price, raising a presumption that most users who come to the accompanying Dab for info on fairness in the behavioral economics sense would be more efficiently helped if they go straight to the fair-price/fair-value article without the delay and disappointment of getting there thru the behavioral-economics article.
# Describing "fairness" as "a form of preferences" (with or without bolding) seems idiosyncratic or obscurely technical at best.
# An entry that invites users to "take a chance" on it, bcz they've understood the other entries without finding one TYat. --Jerzy•t 10:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Behavioral economics" entry 

message: Surely the concept of fairness, used in multiple senses (in law, in politics, in society generally) deserves its own page? "A fair day's work for a fair day's wage". A "fair go". "It's not fair". "Justice as fairness". And so on. Where are the philosophers to write about this? Wikidea 13:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this a disambiguation page?
Talk:Political divisions of Russia

message: Please syncronize the :ru:Муниципальное образование with Subdivisions of Russia#Municipal divisions. (And cross-verify. What's with this municipal reform?) I would suggest to spawn a separate English article. `'Míkka>t 06:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A separate English article is on my to-do list; I only created this subsection as a temporary plug.  As for the synchronizaton, could you, please, point out the discrepancies?  It seems to me that the Russian article pretty much repeats the same categorization this section does (which is no wonder, as both pieces are based on the same law).  Or did you just mean that the Russian version includes more information than this section?  Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Municipal formation, 2

message: Also, Vladimir, not Vladimi.
--Reciprocist (talk) 22:41, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The city is called Belgorod (not Belgorad as in the map) 

message: I think at the very very least we need to hammer out the wording.  Walking into someone's nation and claiming you've annexed it isn't the same as it actually being part of that nation. Hobit (talk) 00:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding annexed territories 

message: As with the actual official page for the Russian Federation, the main map and federal subjects map should reflect dispute, even if you disagree with it, showing the dispute is accurate. StrawWord298944 (talk) 00:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This your work? Draft:Matthew Schroll lol --Criticalthinker (talk) 08:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding DISPUTED Territory 

message: Why not add a list of the political divisions of Russia to this article, which is entitled Political divisions of Russia??? Not having such a list isn't very encyclopedic, is it? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 21:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of list of administrative divisions in this article
Talk:Bee brood

message: Sysop help please:  I inadvertanly uploaded an oversized image. I tried to correct it by uploading a smaller version, but it did not overwrite it as I expected. I tried to delete the original but got a message that only sysops can do this.  Any sysop, please delete the original oversized photo.... Thanks.  Pollinator 16:51, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was wondering if someone could find some reputable sources to support the fact that in Japanese and Chinese culture (perhaps more), eat bee larvae.
Unreputable sources
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080122151147AAhvkzj
http://nordicfoodlab.org/blog/2012/10/bee-larvae-granola
http://travel.usnews.com/features/Countries_That_Eat_Bugs/
--Mouse7mouse9 17:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bee Larvae as Food in Asian Countries? 

message: Sorry, I don't understand what this refers to at all.  For whom and for what purpose is this rating?
IceDragon64 (talk) 21:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating brood ?
Talk:Lumbricus

message: Most of the content of this article is already present in earthworm, thus it should be incorporated there instead of being duplicated here. The article title Lumbricidae is about a family, however the beginning of the article is written to describe the genus Lumbricus only - but there are at least the following genera in this family: Allolobophora, Dendrobaena, Eisenia, Eiseniella, Lumbricus, Octolasium. andy 16:30, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: moved the page to Lumbricus.  A separate family level article is needed.  Definitely most of this should just be put in the general earthworm article.  WormRunner 02:43, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Ottorino Respighi

message: This article calls them symphonic poems. I would have called them orchestral suites, seeing as they are multi-movement works arranged around a common theme and it's a form he would have known well from his baroque study... I am surprised to see that the liner notes of the one Respighi CD in my collection also call them "3 symphonic poems." Anyone else care to chime in with an opinion? Are there any other examples that are so called? Ma Vlast, for instance, consists of 6 symphonic poems but I can't imagine calling the whole cycle "a symphonic poem."
216.67.33.87 05:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unlike Ma Vlast, the movements of the three Respighi works are fairly short, not independent, and lead directly to the next. They do not stand alone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.158.131.87 (talk) 01:59, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification of the Roman Trilogy 

message: There is relatively little description of the composer’s musical style and critical responses to it, or his musical legacy (students, influence, etc.). Reify-tech (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There is unfortunately very few WP:RS on the subject matter, but I'll see what I can do in the future. Newspapers.com has thousands of newspapers on Respighi. Wretchskull (alt) (talk) 11:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing sections 

message: If anyone is keen on adding a bit more about Respighi, here is a ref about him meeting Einstein and talking about the theory of relativity, his relationship with his wife, as well as his class. Wretchskull (alt) (talk) 11:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting info 

message: Are we supposed to assume that the signature posted is his? There's nothing to indicate the source of the signature; i.e. from what document it was scanned. Anybody could "forge" a signature, post it to a biographical site, and coast on the notion that it would just be assumed that the signature was said person's. I could easily scrawl "Tutankhamun" and post it to the Tutankhamun page without citation where it would be assumed to be his signature? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5d50:cfd0:58d5:5f37:1b0e:8bf2 (talk) 06:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Signature
Talk:Abaris the Hyperborean

message: Is Greek all right?
:The Greek looks fine; but I am wondering why what's new in this article isn't simply added to Abaris? Smerdis of Tlön 20:20, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:I Love the '70s

message: If anyone here has copies of the UK episodes of I Love the 70s (and/or 80s and 90s), it'd be great if they could help with the episode pages, as at the moment they're incredibly US-centric, not even mentioning the UK versions. I did I Love 1970 after finding what I believe to be a complete list of the topics covered in the UK version, but that was the only list I could find. I'm hoping the general style of that article will carry through to the others, should they decide to add UK information into them. BillyH 02:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual episode articles 

message: All the individual episodes should be merged into this page since they're all stubs, have little potential of being expanded, and this page is also a stub.  I'll be marking the various other decades as well.  Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 20:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Vincent Astor

message: Anyone have a problem with the way that the original author inserts their own commentary (ungangly?, vain?)? It sound rather "tabloidy." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.196.98.125 (talk) 10:14, 26 July 2006
I do --142.255.42.143 (talk) 03:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: There's the photo of the townhouse on East 80th St. with no mention in the article.  Whose townhouse is it, who lived there and when?
 108.244.74.98 (talk) 09:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the description in :File:Jr League 130 E80 jeh.JPG, it appears that Astor himself once lived there, but it doesn't say when. I've removed it regardless as it didn't really benefit the article. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Bharatiya Jana Sangh

message: @Dhruv edits as you can see in the first line, JS is an acceptable abb. and name. Please dont remvove the same. Venkat TL (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Venkat TL I have removed it from Alphabet J and added it as an alternate name to "Akhil Bharatiya Jana Sangh" under Alphabet A, to avoid duplication and confusion. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Dhruv edits I see. I did not know fully how this works. so if someone uses Jana Sangh will the colour and ABJS appear? Venkat TL (talk) 17:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Venkat TL Yes, though the alternate name "Jana Sangh" has to be defined as an alternate to ABJS in Alphabet J module for it to work, not Alphabet A. See my last changes in Alphabet A and J for clarity. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Module Colour JS
Talk:A very elementary proof that 22/7 exceeds π

message: I don't much care for the title of this page. 
Elementary is relative.
Very elementary is a little strong: Pi was around long before the late 17th century, when calculus was developed.
Perhaps A short proof that... or A calculus proof that ...
Also, it seems that there could be more exposition. Why does this work? Is the polynomial the best 6th order upper approximation of the rational function over that interval? Is there some way to explain how pi works its way in?
~  Jeff 01:16, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Somehow the title should convey that this is not just a numerical computation of the value of π.  Some adjective where "very elementary" appears should convey that.  I suppose the reason why I wrote "very elementary" is precisely that everyone who knows first-year calculus will understand it, whereas much of what is done in the study of the nature of π requires much more advanced work than that.  What would you think of An elementary-calculus proof that 22/7 exceeds π ?  (BTW, neither ">" nor ">" can be used in an article title.)  Michael Hardy 20:01, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Rick Mercer's Monday Report

message: (it was decided to keep)
*Monday Report - from Cleanup. Reads like a press release, about a TV show to be aired in 2004. Secretlondon 14:26, Nov 20, 2003 (UTC)
** From Wikipedia:Cleanup: 
***Monday Report
***- reads like a press release Secretlondon
***- Bah, it isn't even on the air yet. It's an ad. I vote for deletion, it can come back when some people have seen it. Tualha
****I'd previously fixed it to not be a press release, and I've reverted to that revision.  Keep.  Morwen 14:36, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD listing
Talk:Lake Clifton Eastern High School

message: Lake Clifton Eastern High School was listed on VfD on 23 November. The result of the debate on 29 November was to keep the page.
* Revision as of 20:46, 26 Nov 2003 (version at time of decision to keep)
*Another bogus article about an unimportant school.  If you'll read the article, you'll see that it even says in the article that the school will soon no longer even exist.  RickK 01:33, 23 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD listing 

message: The local highschool in Plymouth-Canton MI is 305 acres of land.  How about this one?
;;It is 441.11 acres of land, taken directly from the local real property database.KSweeley 07:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How big in area is this school? 

message: I've typed the layout section from personal experience from attending Lake Clifton in its last 4 years of existence. Many people have actually noted that the school layout is similar to a prison; example: a central core housing administrative offices and radiating from that central core is two smaller buildings which is then broken down to 4 units housing prision cells. I am wondering why my statement was removed. KSweeley 13:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Student of Lake Clifton and statement deletion of the Layout Section 