lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cambridge College

message: An edit  by anonymous User:74.9.53.25 modified and therefore broke two URLs that pointed to a WSJ article about criticism of the College.   I have restored them and have posted a note to User_talk:74.9.53.25, asking the editor not to damage information links in the article. -- Chonak (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible vandalism by 74.9.53.25 

message: The citation from 2003 of a newspaper article accusing Cambridge College of being a degree mill seems inappropriate for an encyclopaedia given that the college is accredited. It is a judgement made by a reporter who is not held to the same standard as an accreditation body. The 1996 historical comment also is based on the same newspaper article. While it may have been relevant in 2003, in the long term (it is now 2011), it does not merit inclusion. In the reference to a "degree mill", Wikipedia writes "A diploma mill (also known as a degree mill) is an organization that awards academic degrees and diplomas with substandard or no academic study and without recognition by official educational accrediting bodies." In the case of Cambridge College, the Wikipedia article writes "Cambridge College is accredited by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges.
The College and all its degree programs are authorized by the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education. The College is also authorized to operate and offer selected degree programs by state authorities in California, Georgia, Puerto Rico, Tennessee, and Virginia." 
For these reasons, I will delete the inappropriate accusation. 
I have no connection with Cambridge College, and was on the web page for other reasons. However, as an occasional editor for Wikipedia, I deemed it appropriate to clean it up.
ClassicalScholar (talk) 21:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies
Talk:Simmons University

message: The redirect Open Access Directory has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 01:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Open Access Directory]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Basic4GL

message: I've decided to create a page for Basic4GL on Wikipedia.
I'll be adding more detail to it over the next few Days.
--Visi calc 19:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent. Check out the Manual of Style and How to edit a page for some help on how to use Wikipedia. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 19:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation
Talk:Bad Astronomy

message: This article from  Discover Magazine is behind a paywall so I can't read it perhaps a copy is available from a library website or from Phil or the author of the article.
Nice long review has loads of great stuff, someone read it and use it to improve the article dramatically  
Article in Savannah Morning News
UniSci review/article
Product review from National Science Teachers Association 
Review in New Scientist also behind paywall.
This is Phil's rebuttal to a bad review, unfortunately the link to the bad review is dead (damn link rot) 
Note that most of these have been inserted as references on the lead of the article, for ease of editing I have put them in WP markup for references.
MrBill3 (talk) 16:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles and Reviews to use to improve article

message: Is there a reason that this article would be tagged as being part of WikiProject Science rather than as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomy? KConWiki (talk) 05:58, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Science?
Talk:Special road

message: I've amended the speed restrictions for heavy goods vehicles (although to be honest I'm not sure this page is the right page to go into details on such restrictions), but I also know there are varying restrictions on other vehicles (such as coaches and non-HGV towing vehicles) ... someone with more knowledge of these regulations needs to fill in the details.
T  Dietrich 19:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Iraqi National List

message: This article requires a section of the political beliefs and policies of the Iraqi National List. - MSTCrow 19:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Politics

message: This party is indicated in the article, Arab Socialist Movement, as being a Syrian political party.  This article is about Iraq.  Why, then, is this party in this article? Dogru144 (talk) 02:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arab Socialist Movement?
Talk:Pieces (film)

message: There was a proposal to move this page to Pieces because Pieces redirects to something wrong. I believe there was a misunderstanding about the nature of disambiguation, so I've removed the request from WP:RM, and made Pieces into a disambiguation page. I believe this should settle any problems. -Patstuarttalk|edits 19:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal 
Talk:John T. Christian

message: Does anyone know when these books were first in print. The edition I have is published by Bogard Press 1922. Could he have had an earlier date for these books? His book Baptist History Vindicated was published in 1899. He died in 1925, so it could very well be that the two volumes came after the Baptist History Vindicated book. Just wondering.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhardecker (talk • contribs) 06:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: A History of the Baptists (vol. 1 & 2)

message: Other pages on Wikipedia are linking to this article and saying that he was known for Landmarkist history, if I understand correctly. The article should address this. — coelacan talk — 19:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Landmarkism

message: I have changed the middle name from "Taylor" to "Tyler". This seems to have more support from credible sources, including Donald Cureton's PhD dissertation on Christian, W. H. Whitsitt, and A. H. Newman. - Rlvaughn 21:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle name 
Talk:Edge coloring

message: I'm uncomfortable with talking about the objective in the third sentence of the intro. That is certainly one possible objective. But other objectives for edge colorings (particularly when dealing with complete graphs) are common, for example, in Ramsey theory you might wish to avoid monochromatic triangles (or other larger complete monochromatic subgraphs) or other monochromatic graphs in the case of Graph Ramsey Theory. At least for beginning of the intro, the notion of an edge coloring should be just that, an arbitrary edge coloring of the graph. Later, we can specialize to whatever additional conditions that we might wish to put on those edge colorings. --Ramsey2006 (talk) 06:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" objective? 

message: -- Additional properties --
:with the property that there exists a proper edge coloring of a given graph G with m1 edges of the first color, m2 edges of the first color, etc.
Maybe 
:first color, m2 edges of the second color, etc.
-- Other types of edge coloring --
:a proper edge coloring in which each pair of colors must be represented by at least one pair of adjacent edges.
Edges? According to article Complete coloring 
:every pair of colors appears on at least one pair of adjacent vertices.Jumpow (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors?
Talk:Arabian tribes that interacted with Muhammad

message: This article needs citations and needs to be edited to conform to Wikipedia's NPOV requirements. Please don't expect users of Wikipedia to accept things as true merely because they are found in the quran or in islamic traditions. That's not how Wikipedia works. Comiscuous (talk) 03:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Grötzsch graph

message: I disagree with the suggestion to use <ref> tags for the references. Harvard style as used here is clearly supported by WP's citation policy, which also says not to change the reference style once set. In addition, I prefer to reserve <ref> for explanatory footnotes, which I think should be kept distinct from bibliographic citations though they may possibly include Harvard-style references within them. —David Eppstein 19:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref tags
Talk:John K. Waters

message: In the confusion of the rescue by Task Force Baum he gets shot in the buttocks.--LandonJaeger (talk) 02:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Injury 

message: "While at OFLAG 64 POW camp, Pat’s father was Lt. Colonel J. K. Waters, Executive Officer and 2nd in command of Lt. Len Feldman, and all the men in captivity in Szubin, Poland. He was a West Point graduate, and serious about adhering to Army regulations in camp because it kept the men’s morale up to feel like Officers and Soldiers instead of prisoners. Many of the men felt they would not have made it back alive without his skills as a leader."  --Erixson (talk) 08:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oflag 64
Talk:Marilyn Ferguson

message: Please note that there are two people with the name Marilyn Ferguson; one is a Christian poet , and the other is the New Age author that is the subject of this Wikipedia article. --Alienlifeformz 19:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs a tremendous amount of work to eliminate its bias (ie, weasel words, NPOV, etc). It reads like an advertisement for her work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artifactblue (talk • contribs) 00:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: More than a year later, I agree that this article is still not neutral - it seems excessively positive and promotional, and needs to be rewritten in places to comply with our policies. Robofish (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]

message: Don't know whom to ask and how to do it, but this article's name is italicized for some reason and I don't see a template  being placed anywhere. From my knowledge, people, places and companies aren't supposed to be italicized. Kind regards,--Biografer (talk) 21:13, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Italics in the article's name
Talk:Guilden Sutton

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide, and include much more than mainly local or national government information.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 13:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Tomography

message: A better efinition to tomography: The reconstruction of an object from a series of transmission projections that are taken from different directions is commonly referred to as tomography. from nature  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikhilndev454 (talk • contribs) 13:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That article is about electron tomography specifically, and not tomography in general. Mikael Häggström (talk) 04:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Definition? 

message: I have deleted the section titled "Use in Industry".  This section simply discussed two products from one company, and was written as though it were copied from the company's advertising material.  Because the section did not appear to provide any new information, I felt deletion was justified.  If an Industry section is to be added, then it should focus on what industrial processes use tomography and how, rather than which products are used. 209.87.255.222 (talk) 20:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of Industry section 

message: I noticed the list does not mention FIB, only TEM... Maybe there should be link to an existing paragraph on it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focused_ion_beam#FIB_tomography
Joedf (talk) 04:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention "FIB tomography" ?
Talk:Trinitarian Bible Society

message: Kind of ironic, since it's a KJV-Only organization now, that the TBS split over the "[i]nclusion of the Biblical Apocrypha in published Bibles" since the KJV had it originally ... but I think the link to Biblical Apocrypha is more appropriate than apocrypha in general, because the KJV had only the Biblical Apocrypha, not any of the other huge corpus of generic apocryphal writings that have never been in the Christian Bible (gnostic, etc). The kind of apocrypha the TBS is objecting to is specificially the  Biblical Apocrypha. It's much less confusing to link directly to the Biblical Apocrypha than to link to the general page and have readers drill down until they find the stub that links to the article. Scott1329m 19:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Exeter Chiefs

message: Does anyone else think we should move the paragraph on branding issue and name to its own section possibly within current kit?  It does sit in a bit of an odd place at the moment. Skeene88 (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. noq (talk) 19:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now done.  Skeene88 (talk) 09:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving branding paragraph
Talk:Sir Donald Bradman Drive, Adelaide

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:UT

message: I'm rearranging them by their year founded. That's the best system, since it also implies great notoriety (just being around longer).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.150.37.124 (talk) 19:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordering Universities

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondestructive_testing lists Ultrasonic testing as "UT"
--Mattrix007 19:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2007
Talk:Highley

message: It would be illuminating if mention of the first Ironbridge (sic), said to be built at Highley, could be dignified with (if citeably known) detail of who built it and when. (Obviously before 1779, the more iconic Ironbridge iron bridge having its bicentenary in 1979.  No mention of any prototype appears in the Wikipedia article on Ironbridge itself.)Cloptonson (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Transport - Iron Bridge

message: I am uncertain how up to date the information is. Is the proposed 'Steam Heritage Centre' same as The Engine House, built by Highley station and opened 2008?Cloptonson (talk) 05:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Proposed' Steam Heritage Centre now realised?

message: I have decided to relegate to this talk page this uncited paragraph about the filming of Lesley Whittle's kidnap/murder as there is nothing that explicitly connects the drama to Highley and does not contribute to the local history factor. (I do not live in Highley.) I retain in case there is information a user could add into a more germane article.
in 1977 a feature film was made entitled 'The Black Panther'. The film is dark, unsensational, and accurately portrays the events leading up to Lesley's tragic death. Nielson is played by Donald Sumpter, and Lesley Whittle by Debbie Farrington. The film was widely banned by cinemas upon release, due to its violent content, and is available on DVD.
Cloptonson (talk) 05:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Digressive paragraph removed (History section)
Talk:List of teachers of Vedanta

message: :::I dont know if any one noticed, but, some ISKON/Gaudiya person put some ISKON/Gaudiya "guru"...some of them Notorious and very contriversial. I would like to take them out...I think it is unapropriate. The ISKON/Gaudiya editors really tinge all of these articles with their "group" slant and propaganda. Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA (talk) 07:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  19th and 20th century Questions and comments 

message: :::Dear all, I took off the hoax comment that was put there. The editor who put it there did not even write the reason for which he placed that in the 19th-20th century scholars section. Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA (talk) 16:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Took off "hoax" banner/comment 
Talk:Seacon Square

message: Many miss out the ground floor, which is below the first floor (which is entrance level from the street). One of the escalators down is in front of McDonald's. It has a large IT section with computers, office, electrical and such as well as other stores selling various things. It also has a Post Office and internet cafe.(171.96.121.92 (talk) 12:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Ground floor
Talk:Noka Chocolate

message: This firm went out of business before June 2011 >http://sidedish.dmagazine.com/2011/06/04/noka-chocolate-factory-in-dallas-is-closed/Tjfloyddc 02:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

message: Relying wholly on reliable sources is going to be important for this article, as much of the recent online coverage of the firm comes from blogs, which generally do not qualify.  In creating the article, I have purposely relied on the firm's own website, on coverage in mainstream media outlets and sources (such as Webpronews) already used as sources on WP, and on the firm's own statement.  For the record, the ten-part series that appeared in late December is at DallasFood. Robertissimo 19:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "it won it from The Nikkei" - More like from the circulation staff of their American distribution, am I right? The page itself even had an "advertisement" disclaimer on it. G-Flex (talk) 05:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing

message: I think the information here misses the point of the Dallas Food investigation... it's not that the couveture comes from a commercial firm - they all do.  It's that NOKA tried to give the impression that they made their own (the reluctance to disclose the chocolate makers is presumably related).  MaskedEditor 15:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dallas Food Article

message: It appears that the latest set of changes have heavily moved this into the Noka propaganda realm.  66.190.75.238 is most likely one of Noka's PR representatives.  I would suggest that this article be reverted to Robertissimo's version since he's obviously a dispassionate observer, while whoever posted the changes in March is practicing apologetics for the company. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Extramsg (talk • contribs) 21:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PR Firm Infection? 

message: The following was left on my User Talk page, and I thought it best to reply here:
:I don't understand why you have removed my changes. I spent a lot of time researching this topic to ensure it was factual and unbiased. I understand Press Releases can be biased but I used only the facts from those releases and nothing to promote the company itself? In fact, I see that you have reverted the article back to a version that, in my opinion, is more biased than my version.
:Roxbury13 23:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edits
Talk:Atlantic Crossing 1

message: The landing station in The Netherlands is Beverwijk, KPN Telecom, not PTT Telecom, that was the old name.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Meurkes (talk • contribs). 
Why is its topology supposed to be "unknown"? For one thing the system simply must have some topology, and then.. I'd say it's a ring.. and fairly obviously so, or isn't it? And if not a ring topology, what else could it be anyway? Zero Thrust (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It would be very interesting if someone could explain why one cable goes north of the UK (apparently a longer route) to get to Germany... Danski14(talk) 01:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout
Talk:Betty Boop's Trial

message: Didn't a short segment of this cartoon show up in the Feb. 21, 1976 edition of the "Weekend Update" segment of Saturday Night Live (passed off as an "artist's rendering" for coverage of the week's developments in the Patty Hearst trial)?  Given what the plot of this 'toon is about, and that one scene takes place in a courtroom in front of a jury, it would seem that it was.  I'd like to know one way or the other; if so, would it be possible to add it as a "trivia" item. –Wbwn 20:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that you mention it, I do have a vague memory of the SNL you're talking about.  Unfortunately, I don't remember enough to confirm that it was the cartoon in question.  I'm not sure how one would go about confirming it.Konczewski 14:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I have confirmed that clip was indeed from this cartoon.  As of the time I write this, YouTube had the colorized version available for viewing.  That's how I was able to put 2 and 2 together. —Wbwn 21:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Haou Airen

message: Kurumi's character description (which is more like an introduction) looks a lot like the intro on this page. It should be rewritten to avoid copyright problems. Ninja neko 19:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed it, will try to write a new one when I find some time. Ninja neko 19:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurumi/introduction 

message: Can you please mark spoilers (there is a story ruining one in Hakuron's description) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.62.230.7 (talk) July 11, 2007
:Please read WP:SPOILER guideline - all spoilers were removed from sections where readers could expect spoilers, like 'plot' and also 'characters'. It is a very big spoiler though, maybe it could be moved to the plot section instead. Anyone else's opinion on this? Ninja neko 09:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers

message: I can't find this manga on Viz catalogue, maybe it was expired? Cracker-Kun (talk) 21:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  License
Talk:Kolibri (video game)

message: I created this page. I'm using http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/32x/data/584363.html as a source for my info. I don't know how to add resource to the main page yet.--Iamstillhiro1112 20:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Raffaëla Paton

message: I'm just asking why her name is written with "aë" since as far as I know, Dutch has no diphtong with a combination between "a" and "e". Thanks before. Yves Revi 20:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Tutte–Coxeter graph

message: As I've already said elsewhere, I disagree with the suggestion to use <ref> tags for the references. Harvard style as used here is clearly supported by WP's citation policy, which also says not to change the reference style once set. In addition, I prefer to reserve <ref> for explanatory footnotes, which I think should be kept distinct from bibliographic citations though they may possibly include Harvard-style references within them. —David Eppstein 19:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref tags 

message: In "Twelve Geometric Essays" Coxeter calls this graph "the most regular of all graphs", but does not explain this comment in detail.
It would be a good idea, if possible, to explain that comment in this article. 2601:200:C000:1A0:C182:4FEB:1412:3D7D (talk) 20:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this the most regular of all graphs?