lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:St. Joseph Notre Dame High School

message: This article seems too highly in praise of this high school. I know very little about the school itself, but some of the praise here seems a bit much.Mipchunk 15:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I actually most of the entries for schools (high school or college) are pretty good. When I have time, I'll see what I can do. Mipchunk 03:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. However, I must at least stress that you cannot take personal offense when somebody makes or proposes changes to an article you started. The article is subject to the collective review of Wikipedians. The primary changes I would make would be a shortening the athletics section. I would follow the standard Wikipedia school template - that is, I would discuss the athletics of the school in general, such as what teams are offered in the school, what the athletic requirements are for students, and then, of course, a summary of the school's athletic achievements. Mipchunk 21:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: It is not entirely clear whether the diversity figures reflect those of the school, the Bay Area, or both. Mannanan51 (talk) 23:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:Deposit & Withdrawal

message: The article should describe the various techniques in a generic fashion (check via mail, EFT from bank account, credit card, Paypal or similar, etc.). This isn't the yellow pages: specific vendors should be removed altogether unless they are particularly notable in a verifiable, referenced way (e.g., objective stats about market leadership, newsworthy happenings, etc.).--Toms2866 15:40, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleting article OK with me.--Toms2866 18:15, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Online gambling would appear to already have a section that is more informative than this article.  I'm thinking there really isn't a reason for this.  I'll prod the article for now. Kuru talk 21:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Silly, badly titled article redirected where the topic is already covered. 2005 21:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article tone
Wikipedia talk:Portal/Guidelines

message: ::::::– North America1000 03:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment 

message: Okay, so I read that you have to look in the contents page of portals. So what is the next step? (User talk:60.229.47.100#top) 05:03, 12 December 2020 (AEDT)
How to make a portal? Mr.brightskin (talk) 16:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no consensus on how to make a portal (this page failed to be adopted as a guideline) or even on what topics merit a portal.  One way to start would be to look at existing portals on similar topics.  If few such portals exist then the topic may not be suitable.  For example, we have very few portals about people, and the bar to creating them is set high.  (Portal:Jesus got deleted.)  Creating a portal is a complex task which we do not often attempt.  If you are new to Wikipedia then it may be wise to gain experience in other areas first.  If you would like to tell us what topic you are considering, someone may be able to give more specific help.  You may also find WP:WikiProject Portals and its talk page useful.  Certes (talk) 17:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: How to make a portal?

message: I don't understand why some portals (e.g. Portal:Mathematics) have links to purge the cache to generate new random entries. Purging the cache is a two-step process that isn't very reader friendly. You can achieve the same effect by reloading the page or clicking the left-right arrows. Isn't this redundant? Schierbecker (talk) 19:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Reloading the page only changes the selection if the portal was recently purged but an old version is still in the reader's browser cache.  For example, refreshing Portal:Mathematics reloads the same FA, currently Kepler.  Purging would show a new FA.  Many portals pick a random subset from a long list, e.g. any 20 from 100.  Clicking the left-right arrows moves within that subset of 20.  Purging generates a new set of 20.  Certes (talk) 22:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. It still seems unnecessary. I really doubt anyone is using portals like that. Schierbecker (talk) 03:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it necessary for Portals to have links to purge the cache? 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) § Portals on the main page.  Cremastra (talk) 22:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#Portals on the main page|Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) §&nbsp;Portals on the main page]]
Talk:Realms of the Haunting

message: Is the release date of 1997 for this correct? The date on the back of the box I have says 1996?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.194.234.186 (talk) 16:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the copyright year. As another editor on Wikipedia informed me some years ago, while it's usually assumed that copyright date equals release date, in actuality products are usually copyrighted a few weeks before they're released. Usually that makes no difference, but if a game is being released in January, it often gets copyrighted in December of the previous year. As I noted in my 2018 edit summary for the article, while we don't have a release date for the game pinned down yet, reviews for it didn't start popping up until well into 1997 (for example, Next Generation reviewed it in an issue cover dated June 1997, which means it was hitting newsstands in April 1997), so a 1996 release seems highly improbable. Of course, given that the copyright year was 1996, it's also highly improbable that the game wasn't released until April of 1997, but my guess would be it's somewhere in the middle ground, in January or February of 1997. Given that editors keep changing the date, I'm going to try setting it at simply "1997" until we get a reliable source to identify the specific date. Martin IIIa (talk) 22:50, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date?
Category talk:Languages of Nigeria

message: I think this category should be merged with the category  Ethnic Groups in Nigeria — Azuka 15:24, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't. Languages cannot be equated to ethnic groups, and both are interesting and encyclopedic in their own ways. — mark ✎ 17:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I see your point but in Nigeria, ethnic groups and languages are intertwined, — Azuka 22:24, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merging of Categories
Talk:Zelda (turkey)

message: I could say more but it would be original research. Perhaps a photo one of these days ... --Cam 15:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The bird is no more. Epicgenius (talk) 01:18, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Glastonbury chair

message: Is there a reference for the name John ARTHUR?
My reading suggests the Treasurer hung with Abbot Whiting was named John THORNE.
see http://www.glastonburyshrine.co.uk/monks.htm
and "The Bishop's Palace Wells" Guide book published by the Palace.
Chinnery gives the name as "John Arthur Thorne" and describes him as Treasurer (as do many sources). I find it unlikely that he was the carpenter who actually made the chair. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:55, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Arthur Thorne
Talk:Aytos

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 07:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

message: What official system? The truth of the matter is that when you enter or exit the town of Aitos the road signs have the latin spelling as "Aitos" not "Aytos". The town's official Web site is www.aitos.org, again with the "i". In every official document or place in the town or the municipality the romanization of the spelling is "Aitos", including historic places and monuments. That's what's official! 
So why would you write it otherwise again? What, are we gonna call the town and ask them to change their road signs, their website, their monuments and all other official documents to "y"?! That doesn't make any sense.  --71.233.118.131 (talk) 00:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's Aitos with the "i" everywhere in the town, the muncipality and the district of Burgas
Talk:Australian cricket team in England in 2005

message: Just noticed Martyn's surname is spelt wrong in the Aus 1st test, 1st innnings graph - may be others???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.91.183 (talk) 07:29, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a template for the runrate graphs? 
Talk:Private sub-domain registry

message: I moved this article from "Independent Domain Registrars" to "Independent Domain Registries" because the organisations mentioned actually operate the authoritative databases for their respective DNS namespaces, and as such are domain registries rather than domain registrars, who are authorised to manage registrations at the registry.
Disclosure: I work for CentralNic, one of the companies mentioned. Gavin Brown 15:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I have a problem with the title of this article in that I dont' believe that "Independent Domain Registry" is an established term.  Googling it finds about two references to this phrase, not including references on Wikipedia itself, which leads me to suspect that this Wikipedia article is the original source of the term.
I propose renaming this article to "Private Sub-Domain Registries", since this is the term that CentralNIC, the leading such registry, uses to describe themselves here https://www.centralnic.com/company/innovation Roybadami (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now moved (and made title follow wikipedia naming conventions) Roybadami (talk) 00:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an established term 

message: dobrej zabawy 188.33.241.126 (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Para pozna Panją
File talk:WP1 0 Icon.png

message: AFAIK, if this image is based on :Image:CD autolev crop.jpg, which is licensed under the GFDL, this image should be licensed under the GFDL too, shouldn't it? Maybe Ubern00b is willing to release its image under a dual license. HTH --surueña 15:40, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is a derivative logo of :Image:Wiki.png, which is copyrighted by the Wikimedia Foundation, ergo the GFDL cannot be applied to the image. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 06:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: License issues
Talk:Communist League of Great Britain

message: Members of Communist League participated in publishing this book: http://www.allianceml.com/PAPER/2005NOVEMBER/Chapter1_4HoxhaFIN.html  so I deleted the words about them not existing. 80.202.93.131 15:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clearing that up! Warofdreams talk 23:26, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Niagara Falls Flyers

message: * Completed fair use rationale. Flibirigit (talk) 23:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NF Flyers 1.gif

message: * Completed fair use rationale. Flibirigit (talk) 23:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NF Flyers 2.gif
Talk:Chelmsford County High School for Girls

message: not sure if low or mid, but its definately a start Victuallers 19:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From what I know of Latin, that should be
vitae lampadam ferimus
Why is vitae misspelled and why is lampada not in the accusative case?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wavetossed (talk • contribs) 22:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is that motto right? 
Talk:Vladimir Dekanozov

message: I have move protected the article because of the move warring. If you intend to move the article please file WP:RM as the moving is certainly controversial. Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not even sure whether Dekanozishvili is a correct alternative rendition of the guy's surname. As far as I remember, it was Dekanozov's son who adopted a Georgian surname, while Vladimir Georgievich himself always used a Russified form. He was of mixed Armeno-Georgian ancestry. I'll try to find some sources.--KoberTalk 16:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Armenian ancestry is quite typical for Georgian intellectuals, so there is no controversy here.DonaldDuck (talk) 04:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

text:  And "russification" of names is quite typical for NKVD officers, too.DonaldDuck (talk) 04:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

text: First of all, he was not an "intellectual" and I don't quite understand what you mean by "Armenian ancestry is quite typical for Georgian intellectuals". Second, Dekanozov's surname had been Russified long before he became a NKVD officer and I'm not sure whether Dekanozishvili was his surname at birth. Anyway, I don't generally like to discuss such things without having sources at hand. As I said before I will try to obtain references and make necessary changes in the article. --KoberTalk 04:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move protected

message: When there is a conflict about the true identity and origin of a person, in this case Vladimir Dekanozov, you can add theories and claims that contradict official documents and other claims / vice versa. But don't simply remove either them altogheter in favour of one over the other. Both majority and minority views have to be considered. The theory that Vladimir Dekanozov was in truth Estonian, is as far as I am aware, not the academic consensus, but a minority view. TheMightyGeneral (talk) 11:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity conflict.
Talk:Cascade, New Hampshire

message: I have changed the category for this entry from "Cities of New Hampshire" to "Unincorporated Communities of New Hampshire".  Cascade is clearly not a city, but I notice that the "unincorporated communities" category only contains unincorporated townships at this point, not smaller communities that are located within incorporated cities or towns.  The category "Census-Designated Places" already contains several villages, such as Contoocook or Groveton, which are not incorporated, but I wanted to be able to have a place for some of the smaller villages which already have articles written about them but don't seem to fit anywhere else yet.  (Etna is another candidate for the unincorporated places category.)  Comments?  Ken Gallager 15:53, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Hamlet" has a technical meaning in the state of New York, but has no such meaning in New Hampshire, and I have almost never heard it used here.  "Village" could mean specifically "being part of a village district", but it also is regularly used to mean any named settlement within a larger incorporated community. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it worth mentioning that there are two sections of “Cascade Village” known as Cascade Hill and Cascade Flats? The Flats are where Mary's Pizza and the mill is and the hill is where Mother Goose Daycare is. --Russianamerican1 (talk) 00:25, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means!  Any distinctions like that, with history as well, would be welcome. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:39, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Okay, I don't know if there is any refs. about Cascade village but I'll try to find some because this article needs a little more of them.--Russianamerican1 (talk) 15:34, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

text: I edited and added some information. I also added a “History” section. The article looks a little more well presented.--Russianamerican1 (talk) 17:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cascade Hill & Cascade Flats
Talk:A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian

message: I think notability is fairly clear here. Why was the tag added one minute after I created the article? Stu ’Bout ye! 15:53, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Better check with User:(aeropagitica), who added it.  There's been an awful lot of notability tags put on the wrong articles lately, but as long as they're corrected... -- THE GREAT GAVINI {T|C|#} 19:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: is a straight copy-and-paste from the book's jacket. Will try and write a more appropriate one when I have time. Gusworld (talk) 00:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary .  . .
Talk:Mike Friedrich

message: User 66.245.50.194, who identified himself on my talk page with the e-mail address MikeFriedrich99@earthlink.net, may or may not be actually the comic-book writer Mike Friedrich, given that anyone could use the name MikeFriedrich99. Regardless, he made major, unwikified additions that even on cursory reading appears to follow the format of a press-release biography. It makes numerous unverified claims, uses improper formatting (only first word and proper nouns are capped in subheads, for example), and if this is indeed Mike Friedrich the unverified claims are original research and WP:COI. If it is not Friedrich, it violates WP:NOT by being essentially a resume, and also by its non-encyclopedic WP:TONE.
I propose rather than a full overhaul that creates a press release-style text inappropriate for an encyclopedia that we make edits one paragraph at a time and let fellow editors collaborate on this in manageable chunks. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jan. 3 edits

message: Friedrich was bought up as Roman-Catholic[5] (However he could just as very well be Jewish.[6]) He is now a Methodist Deacon.[7]???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8004:2740:761C:79D7:BFD2:C76:BC8A (talk) 13:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   Yeah... Um... Does anyone think that this line makes sense?
Talk:P. Craig Russell

message: Russell did do some work not listed or numbered - for example an issue of Morbius in Adventure into Fear. Shouldn´t they get mentioned in the bibliography ? -- Beardo (talk) 00:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnumbered works
Talk:TwoMorrows Publishing

message: The previous version of this page read like promotional press-release copy.  I've edited it to a more encyclopedic style — in the process deleting uncited, unfootnoted hype such as "Proudly carry the banner", "one of the lights of the world of comics fandom" (!) and "TwoMorrows has become the largest publisher of fan-related books and magazines in comics," a comment that the publisher of Wizard, who appeared this year on the cover of Inc., might, for instance, take exception with. (Don't get me wrong; I love Comic Book Artist and Alter Ego, buy them on the stands every month, cite them chapter & verse in my Wiki articles. But this is an encyclopedia, not a place for self-promotion, and sometimes not everyone understands that until it's explained.) --Tenebrae 07:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. And they're great magazines. (But you can see where the "I'd say" part is non-encyclopedic; stating just the numbers, something like, "TwoMorrows publishes 8 bi-monthly magazines, the largest number of any comics-oriented press" or whatever. SeewhatImean?) -- Tenebrae 20:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My edits
Category talk:Animal anatomy

message: FFFI have beenmassively boost the amount of information Wikipedia provides on animal anatomy but right now it not :
*[[animal anatomyvuyf
]] or zootomy - the parent page (perhaps with this article merged into it)
**vertebrate anatomy
***mammal anatomy (perhaps also marsupial anatomy and montreme anatomy)
***bird anatomy - there is already a bird skeleton article, and more than enough info can be taken from the bird articlenatomy]] (as of 08/05/06 redirects to reptile)
***amphibian anatomy
***bony fish anatomy
****cartilaginous fish anatomy
**invertebrate anatomy
***crustacean anatomy 
***insect anatomy etc...
:The list could go on forever, I'm not sure whether ALL the possible articles deserve to exist, but most certainly the mammal/bird/reptile/amphibian/fish ones do, as that is what we all grown up with as the five main animal groups from early school. These article currently exist to deal with this field:
*cat anatomy - poor
*dog anatomy - good, but isn't really anatomy, more their physical appearance
*frog zoology - good
*[category:horse anatomy] - a whole category, with articles such as equine forelimb anatomy
*[catagory:marsupial zootomy]
*[catagory:dog anatomy]
*bird skeleton - good
:I have to admit I am no expert, I propose this in the hope that someone who is can help. What does everyone think? mastodon 15:59, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Animal anatomy
Talk:La couleur de l'enfer (Lapinot)

message: Is there a French counterpart to this article?--Thumbtax 16:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interlanguage Link 
Talk:Interstate 10 in Louisiana

message: I think I remember reading about Orange, Texas lobbying to get I-10 through it. Can't find it right now though. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 16:05, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The government claims the spelling to be Laplace. The parish is confused or there are three different towns in the area. Actually they lean more towards LaPlace, to be technical.  Although the name is really LaPlace, Louisiana there could be a great discussion as to who would be correct. If anyone locates the other two towns please let us know. I know the name is spelled LaPlace but the authority given to the government actually makes the official spelling Laplace.
In light of this information I would like to ask that editors hold up on the keyboard tapping (editing) for a period as I have contacted the Parish concerning the problem. I find it hard to believe that nobody in the parish has noticed this. Otr500 (talk) 01:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Conclusion

message: The info under the map of Louisiana that highlights the route of I-10 says that the highway is maintained by the "Louisiana DOT". That is incorrect, as the name of the agency is "Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD or Louisiana DOTD).
Bdj95 (talk) 07:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 
Talk:Top Shelf Productions

message: This entry is somewhat promotional, specifically in the unsourced statements regarding critical acclaim and in insanely subjective declarations such as: "The future promises stellar new releases sure to appeal to both connoisseurs of superb narrative art and fans of engaging pop culture..." The information, however, deserves to appear here, it just needs to be presented more objectively. AshcroftIleum 19:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. Now we need to build it back up and address the notability concerns. (Emperor 00:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marketspeak

message: I've started a new category for Top Shelf and there is one for the titles: :Category:Top Shelf Productions titles. I'll go through and add it to some but probably am not going to be able to hit them all so go for it. (Emperor 12:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: Currently the titles are sorted with subheadings (Alan Moore, Craig Thompson, Andy Runton, Jeffrey Brown, James Kochalka, Alex Robinson, Renée French, Jason Hall, Matt Kindt, Nicolas Mahler, Tom Hart, Rich Koslowski, Tony Consiglio, Dan James, Max Estes, David Yurkovich and Misc). Any objections to resorting those by last-name? Also like to put a sortable wikitable for each creator (to sort by title name or publication date) --EarthFurst (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles sorting 