Talk:Alexandra Cabot

message: The rason I moved Alexandra Cabot (Law & Order: SVU character) to Alexandra Cabot (NBC) is now because of the fact that she has now to have appeared on 2 different NBC series, Law and Order SVU and the new Conviction.--Roadrunner3000 22:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes...Do you have a question about this? Michael 06:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Nonetheless, as a part of the L&O family, it counts under that classification, despite the style difference and titular difference. Michael 02:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: They did say it will be explained, but I don't have a source on hand.  They added March to the cast at the last minute, so most early episodes were already written. Michael 03:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I highly doubt we'll ever get an explanation now that Conviction is done with. Michael 02:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My reason for moving

message: According to Law & Order franchise, Conviction is part of the L&O franchise, and--like (Star Trek) Enterprise--does not have the franchise name in the series title. Others in :Category:Law & Order characters have simply (Law & Order) in the article name. --Christopherlin 19:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes...Do you have a question about this? Michael 06:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Nonetheless, as a part of the L&O family, it counts under that classification, despite the style difference and titular difference. Michael 02:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Better name?

message: It remains to be seen if her departure from witness protection and return to New York will be explained in the series when it airs, although at the time, it is not believed that such will be the case.
'''
Says who?  Back it with a source or else I'm removing it.  Personally, I find it very unlikely that it won't be explained.  SVU fans are going to want to know how she got back, and the manner that she was written out of the show practically necessitates an explanation.  People just don't magically reappear from Witness Protection.--buckeyes1186 04:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They did say it will be explained, but I don't have a source on hand.  They added March to the cast at the last minute, so most early episodes were already written. Michael 03:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I highly doubt we'll ever get an explanation now that Conviction is done with. Michael 02:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No explanation of Cabot's reappearance?

message: The article seems to say that Bureau Chief and EADA is the same thing. Jack McCoy is not a Bureau Chief...I do believe Bureau Chiefs are higher up the ladder than EADA's or Da's.
Any links to verify?
:I would assume that the somewhat cryptic title must be above EADA at the very least. James Steele, the deputy DA character clearly answers to her. Sean Hayford O'Leary 07:28, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ADA is the lowest, followed by DDA, followed by Burea Chief, followed by DA.  I'm not sure whether EADA falls before or after Bureau Chief or if it is the same. Michael 03:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A tad irrelevant now, but I think I got it now: Plain old ADA would be at the bottom of the chain, Deputy Bureau Chief/DDA outranks that, then Bureau Chief, then EADA, then DA. I place EADA higher because their is only one known EADA (Stone/McCoy) but multiple known Bureau Chiefs (Elizabeth Donnelly, Tracey Kibre, Cabot). On the other hand, EADAs are probably less political than Bureau Chief as they're effectively the DA's "right-hand man". Sean Hayford O'Leary 07:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In one episode of SVU, Donnelly was referred to as an EADA. Michael 07:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bureau Chief vs. EADA

message: Changed the main image to a screenshot I took from the title sequence on season 2 of SVU.  If anyone wants to switch it back, be my guest.  I just personally thought it looked better there.  :)  (TehLostBug 02:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image changed