lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:GabrielF/AfDs

message: *Comment - Not an accusation, but a interesting note, if Tom harrison shows up then we have almost everyone from Mortons friends list, that has a -rl tag, appear here to vote keep. 
:*Aude
:*MONGO
:*TBeatty
:*Junglecat
:*GabrielF
:*Dual Freq
:*Mobile1
:*Its like a who's who of the friends page. =) --NuclearZer0 11:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *So? With the exception of TellyAddict, all the delete votes came from the group that previously opposed the page. Besides several neutral or uninvolved editors have voted keep. GabrielF 14:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of the 13 editors who !voted "Keep", only six are on that list (I'm not counting GabrielF). So... you're kinda just grasping at straws. This isn't the notice board; get  over it. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, whats it matter that half the people are from the same group? Relax it was just an observation lol. How can you leave out GabrielF anyway? so that makes just over half. --NuclearZer0 17:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm leaving him out because it seems silly to assign a specific weight to his "Keep" !vote; it's a subpage of his, of course he's going to say Keep. If he didn't want it kept, he'd tag it with . EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NU's observations 

message: You're comments are simply irrelevant to the discussion of the XfD.  This only creates conflict by commenting on editors instead of content.  The XfD page should be limited to comments on the merits of the arguments of the editors, not on the editors themselves.  18:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not edit comments from people you have had disputes with in the past. Further how people arrive at an AfD is releveant, especially when the page in questino is being accused of assisting in mean puppetry and bias notices of how to vote. --NuclearZer0 21:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

text: And please sign your comments with --~~~~ please --NuclearZer0 21:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your comment is, largely, unrelated to the MfD in question, as they are two different pages. Moving the comments out of the MfD proper and into the talk page is perfectly reasonable. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am not in a dispute with anyone
Talk:Wallerian degeneration

message: The second paragraph seems out of place in this page. "The nerve fiber's neurolemma does not degenerate and remains as a hollow tube. Within 96 hours of the injury, the proximal end of the nerve fiber sends out sprouts towards those tubes and these sprouts are attracted by growth factors produced by Schwann cells in the tubes. If a sprout reaches the tube, it grows into it and advances about 3-4 mm per day, eventually reaching and reinnervating the target tissue. If the sprouts cannot reach the tube, for instance because the gap is too wide or scar tissue has formed, surgery can help to guide the sprouts into the tubes. This regeneration however happens only in peripheral nerves, not in the spinal cord. The crucial difference is that in the central nervous system, including in the spinal chord, myelin sheaths are produced by oligodendrocytes and not by Schwann cells."
.
The discussion of regeneration in the peripheral and central nervous systems is so general it could be misleading.  Sprouting does occur in the CNS in humans and animals and causes compensation after injury.
(NeuroHistol 23:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'm baffled when reading the second paragraph - what grows where and why the text on regeneration is included in the beginning of the article on degeneration. --CopperKettle 11:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Second paragraph

message: I have included an infobox with the MeSH term, but the link does not work properly. Would be glad if anybody fixes it. Please note that the same in included in a different format in the External links section which needs to be removed after the task is accomplished. DiptanshuTalk 19:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: MeSH term link

message: A decent amount of new literature has been published that has not yet been included in this page. Particularly, the role of SARM1 and other proteins in the pathway is much better understood, providing a better understanding for the important of NAD+ and NMNAT proteins. Would appreciate any help editing or fact checking the new information I am adding. --WikiAidan (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating the page
Talk:Micrometeoroid

message: It seems to me misleading to frame the discussion of micrometeoroids primarily as dangers to space exploration; they are heavily studied as clues to astrobiology, the origin of life, etc. I'm only beginning to explore this topic so as of now I'm not going to edit the article, but I'm leaving this note in hope that someone who is more informed might edit it. 
Brownlee particles (a.k.a. Cosmic dust) seem to be relevant to this discussion as well. --babbage 23:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: *There is considerable overlap (not as much as bolide though). Rsduhamel 05:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal to meteoroid 

message: The text under the heading "Flux" is redundant between the two large paragraphs. If someone hasn't merged the two into a better paragraph when next I return, I will edit it. Swarmphysics (talk) 21:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks for calling this out. Check out my edits to see whether they retain the essential material and create a logical flow. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 00:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Flux section

message: Project star dust photographs them using John Larsen and they are single chondrules. 2607:FEA8:299D:CD00:2477:A3EB:40D8:CF9E (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A chondrule is a micrometeorite
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Aix

message: How can one archdiocese be a suffragan of another? Isn't Aix a diocese and not an archdiocese? Rwflammang 17:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Archdiocese?

message: I removed the French Republic flag icon from the Infobox, in accordance with several sections of WP:ICON; specifically (quoting),
* "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many...."
* "Flags make simple, blunt statements about nationality, while words can express the facts with more complexity." [Saint-Brieuc was for many centuries part of the independent County of Provence, of the Kingdom of France, and of the Empire of Napoleon I. The flags were quite different from the flag of the Republic]....
* "Do not rewrite history. Flags should not be used to misrepresent the nationality of a historical figure [including some bishops], event, object, etc. Political boundaries change, often over the span of a biographical article subject's lifetime. Where ambiguity or confusion could result, it is better not to use a flag at all, and where one is genuinely needed, use the historically accurate flag."
--Vicedomino (talk) 15:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed flag of French Republic, per [WP:ICON]; see TALK page.
Talk:Prosopopoeia

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: how the bloody hell is this relevant?: Before becoming a Senator, John Edwards was reputed to have made such an argument in one of his most famous tort cases, representing the family of a girl who had been killed by a defective pool drain. --Ryan Heuser 22:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a well-known case and a clear example of the use of prosopopoeia as a rhetorical device - if I recall correctly, Edwards specifically told the jurors that the deceased was speaking to them through him (and not in the psychic sense). bd2412 T 00:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Edwards? 

message: Is the swedish reality game really relevant. It doesn't have an article of its own, but that can be remedied. I just don't think it meets the notability criteria. It seems like it is just an advertisement to me; an excuse to link to their website.--66.102.196.40 (talk) 16:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would tend to agree.  Is there any good reason to keep it up there?  Does it help explain prosopopoeia in any important way? --Ahatcher (talk) 02:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reality Game. 

message: Two out of three reference links are broken. Fix? Delete? Keep?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.243.137.56 (talk) 20:43, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References broken
Talk:Backchannel (disambiguation)

message: Is this another context: Backchannel, as in discussion forums.  I have heard the use of the term Backchannel used here, but I was not confident enough to add it to the page - ie "Off-list" or outside the forum communications between members =  using the back-channel. --Derekcx (talk) 23:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online 

message: I removed quite a few statements from the medicine section due to them being speculative or outright false. I work in the industry and have specific knowledge, but can't cite sources at this time, so I opted to remove, rather than correct/change them. May do more later Markoy21 (talk) 17:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In medicine 

message: There is a large amount of overlap with the article Backchannel. They should be merged. --Thüringer ☼ (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.  So far this is just a wiktionary entry, or an overgrown disambiguation page.  Any worthwhile content here should be merged into backchannel and/or wiktionary.  64.40.60.88 (talk) 21:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Backchannel]]?
Talk:Prosperity consciousness

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Prosperity Consciousness shares a large linguistic similarity of the language to promote the Prosperity Gospel and may warrant further expansion. Any thoughts pro or against? MrEarlGray (talk) 14:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarities to the Prosperity Gospel
Talk:R. Madhavan/autoPR

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
*If this article is about a person, please add  along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.[?]
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 18 additive terms, a bit too much.
*Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't.
*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, GameKeeper 23:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Via Domitia

message: 78.125.51.169 (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :
Does that mean that he followed it, or crossed it? —Tamfang (talk) 03:17, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hannibal 
Talk:Crossing Midnight

message: Tables should only be in specific contexts (where there is data that benefits from this approach) and the storyline section really isn't it - it should be done in prose form. I'll try and get back and sort it out but just in case I don't I wanted to drop a note in. (Emperor (talk) 21:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Storyline table

message: Saburo, who is quoted in the article as "a childhood friend" is a Japanese name for a third child.
He is the twins' younger sibling.  Not a friend.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.144.106.72 (talk) 23:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Mistake
Talk:Prydain

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: This is one of the more ridiculous maps on Wikipedia. The starting point is that it has no date attached, whereas in fact the distribution of tribes on the island and, more especially the hegemony of one over others, was very dynamic. To suggest a common ethnicity for Northumbrians, Kentish men and West Cymry is ludicrous. Dalriadans are shown - yet what evidence is there that they were not "Britons" or "Cruithin"? None. So too with what the artist supposes to be "Pictland" (I presume). Let us suppose that this map is meant to date to 200 (the earliest conceivable date for Dalriada). At this point there were no "Picts" at all.  And what about the Parisi? They were already entrenched on the North bank of the Humber by the time the Romans arrived 150 years earlier.... 
I could go on... Freuchie (talk) 17:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Autun

message: QUOTING the article:    "The area also lies in the area of Burgundy, and in the Middle Ages, it was a Count of Autun who became the first Duke of Burgundy."
To me, this seems a very roundabout wording.  How about:
"Autun is in Burgundy, and in the Middle Ages, a Count of Autun became the first Duke of Burgundy."
This may be incorrect. I'm just asking.  Wanderer57 (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording Question

message: I just struck me that the article about Autun is all about the Autun of long ago.  Should there not also be information about the modern town/city of Autun?
Wanderer57 (talk) 05:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient History 

message: "In the late 9th century, Charles Martel's daughter (name listed as Auda, Alane, or Aldana) married Thierry IV (also called Theoderich or Theoderic), Count of Autun. According to the controversial book Holy Blood Holy Grail (which may merely be repeating local legend), Theoderic was declared a King by the Carolingians, and his son was Saint William of Gellone. (For more details on this topic, see Septimania#References in popular culture.)"
Logical fallacy. Charles Martel died in the year 741 which makes it quite impossible for his daughter to be married in the late ninth century unless she was approximately 125 years old at the time. 
I think the above is based on the book "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (referring to the otherwise completely unknown 'Theodoric IV') and its historicity is severly contested. The 'repeating local legend' quote says it all. I suggest removing the italicised quote or editing it until it contains verifiable information. Or, better yet, removing any reference to the 'Holy Blood, Holy Grail' material alltogether. Harachte (talk) 17:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual inaccuracies 
Talk:Hurricane Alberto (1982)

message: #NPOV: Pass
#Well-written: Its hink's writing, what do you think I'm gonna say. Pass
#Broad: Pass
#Fact Accurate: Pass
#Images: Pass
#Stability: Pass
Well done hink. GA'd.Mitchazenia 14:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Assessment 

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass
Talk:Kansas City Command

message: As part of the clean-up of the various edits of a vandal, I have removed the names "Brian Hiller", "Todd Morgan", and "Brian Morehouse" from this article. I haven't the faintest idea whether these are actual names of members of the KCB. I removed them because they were added by an IP that did a lot of vandalism, and essentially no good edits. So my best guess is that these are vanity/vandalism additions.
If these are real players, my apologies. Tugbug 09:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three names removed 

message: I added "Fan of the Year" information once before, but it was deleted.  So I added them again.
SonomaScott (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added "Fan of the Year" 

message: Roster will need updating as season goes on.
SonomaScott (talk) 01:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Roster
Talk:Patrice Munsel

message: My mother's family lived next door to the Munsils in Spokane, on North 29th Street in the 30's and 40's. Patrice's name was originally Patricia but someone must have felt that "Patrice Munsel" was a more marketable "stage-name" than Patricia Munsil.  I think they were correct.  Comment made by EoGuy (originally in the external links section of Patrice Munsel's article page) which I have now transferred to this discussion page. Figaro (talk) 03:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrice Munsel's birth name
Talk:Cave of the Trois-Frères

message: Not much about the actual occupants in the article.Wikirictor (talk) 21:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Occupants

message: The equivalent French article is one of four: one for each of the caves and another on the Volp Caves as a whole. Shouldn't that be the case in the 
English Wikipedia using http://cavernesduvolp.com/en/, the French articles and other sources as a basis? Mcljlm (talk) 05:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional articles 

message: this seems like a solid, well written and well documented ref that should be in here
https://www.donsmaps.com/tucdaudoubert.html#reference  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:192:4700:1F70:C7:1D61:903:8B39 (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: add this ref=
Talk:Carbocation

message: The introduction puts forward the following definition:
:A carbocation (IPA pronunciation: [kɑ(r)'bəʊkæt'aɪ.ɒn]) is an ion with a positively-charged carbon atom.
In the definition section another definition is put forward:
:In present day chemistry a carbocation is any positively charged carbon atom. 
The first definition would accept a any polyatomic ion with a charged carbon atom as a carbocation... perhaps if "an ion with" is removed it would be more clear?  
Mergers need to be made!
* explain why you posted the merge notices without discussion here and why did you not sign your post. V8rik 20:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: Do we need the carbonium ion image?. This will only confuse readers who are mostly interested in trivalent carbon. Carbonium ion has its own page. Lets try to limit the information creep. V8rik (talk) 17:23, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need the carbonium ion image? 

message: Although carbocations are classified to carbenium ion (R3C+) or carbonium ion (R5C+), this article does not mainly describe R5C+ but R3C+. Therefore, most of contents of this article should be merged to carbenium ion. --Nao1958 (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Carbenium ion]]
Talk:Pukka sahib

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: "The word "pukka" is still used formally in 19th- and 21st-century English and Greek"
So what is it supposed to mean that the term is "still" used in the 19th-century versions of the language. GeneCallahan (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neither 19th-century English nor Greek is a current language 

message: None of the references given are valid. #1, “OED”, is merely a link to the Wikipedia article about the OED. The references to the literary works lack page numbers, publishers, and dates of publication. The reference to “Lexico” appears to be a database lookup to an out-of-date source. I think they should all be removed and the article either deleted or fully revised. Poihths (talk) 20:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No valid references
Talk:Arena of Nîmes

message: We need a redirect on the English site for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arènes_de_Nîmes  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.15.92.117 (talk) 18:45, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

message: "reconquest by the French kings in the early eighteenth century" - the eighth century is meant??--Revery (talk) 17:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: French reconquest

message: The ancient appearance  seems much different than the modern.  It looks like there were statues and possibly railings around the exterior, more levels, and it looks like seating has not been restored to some of the modern parts that previously collapsed - see :File:Arena Nîmes - inside.JPG, .  It would also be interesting to have some images showing how the interior buildings were arranged. The restoration includes wood seating ; wondering if that was also present in ancient times (and presumably would not have survived). -- Beland (talk) 16:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion ideas

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Arenes de Nimes Alt 1.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for Sepember 16, 2023. A preview of the POTD can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-09-16. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Aviafanboi (talk) 07:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:List of arrondissements of France

message: Any new arrondissements since 2003 and as of 2007? Johnluisocasio 17:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, some updates must be fill in --Kisscool57 (talk) 10:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: Please update to the 2023 stats, 1 more arrondissement in Guyane, notably, cf french version TheÆtherPlayer 11:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 update