lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mon Chérie

message: From VfD:
This seems to be an Italian advertisement for a particular brand of chocolate covered cherries. (Though my Italian is execrable these days, I don't think I'm all that far off...). Advertisement, not encyclopedic. - Kenwarren 04:31, Jul 24, 2004 (UTC)
*My Italian is non-existent, but a Babelfish translation leads me to a similar conclusion. Delete ad - do not translate, do not send to Italian Wikipedia (unless I'm horribly wrong about the advertising content). -- Cyrius|✎ 04:54, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Hide and Seek (Stargate Atlantis)

message: I think we need to explain MALP (Mobile Analytic Laboratory Probe) and ZPM. Maybe external page, or possibly a section. Ylai 10:23, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  MALP/ZPM 
Talk:Spell

message: hehe this is a page which needs some attention; flagging it as such Sjc 06:38, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page has ballooned a bit like most dab pages do over time. I'm tidying it up in line with MoS:DP before disambiguating the links to it:
*Formatting page with leading line
*Removing entries that don't disambiguate Spell. If I do find any incoming links to the 'spellings' meanings while I'm disambiguating, I'll replace the entries here but I don't think there will be (m)any
*Unlinking all words that don't disambiguate Spell
*Adding See also for related terms
If anyone disagrees with any of my deletions, feel free to replace any item but please leave a note here to let me know why. Many thanks ~ Veledan • Talk 20:43, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidying the page
Talk:Courland

message: Please add to the article also Finnish name for Courland which is "Kuurinmaa", also known as "The Land of Crane".
JN
:There is a Livonian name in the article and the Finnish name is included in the links. I doubt that the Finnish name is needed in the article, though I'm myself a Finno-Ugric. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii 12:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land of Crane 

message: Can we consider Courland a de facto independant state if Liepaja regionalist is the incumbant prime minister of Latvia? --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii 12:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independant? 
Talk:Sourav Ganguly

message: Sourav Ganguly 1st India cricketer in 65 years to become BCCI president: Sourav Ganguly is all set to be elected unopposed as the new BCCI president. The former India captain filed his nomination for the coveted post on 14th October 2019 at the BCCI headquarters in Mumbai. He was accompanied by former BCCI bosses Niranjan Shah and N Srinivasan as he became the only candidate to file the nomination. Aftabon (talk) 18:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You didn't mention what kind of change you want to be made in the article. The request should be of he form "Please change X to Y". - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2019 

message: 180.148.212.166 (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 August 2021 

message: His surname is Maharaja. Thats all. 27.5.110.2 (talk) 03:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maharaja of Indian Cricket? 

message: The introductory section is huge. Please rectify it. Thanks. 2405:201:8016:D8E6:4104:7BBF:F332:7471 (talk) 16:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Rally for Culture and Democracy

message: Why on earth would one call a party like the RCD "liberal"? - Mustafaa 09:45, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wisdom tooth

message: Given this article is on Wisdom teeth, and not impacted wisdom teeth, shouldn't there be at least one illustration of non-impacted, correctly aligned wisdom teeth?
::Not an unreasonable request, but pictures of abnormal are more common than the unremarkable. If you can find one, post it.Dig Deeper (talk) 04:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Just make sure they're within our rights. ECPBlue (talk) 14:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I just created a whole category for healthy wisdom teeth on Wikimedia Commons. I'll try to upload stuff to it: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Healthy_wisdom_teeth Roquex (talk) 21:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No pictures of healthy wisdom teeth 

message: This claim is made at the bottom of the history tab, but it’s citation (#29) is an Ohio state news pop science article which only very briefly mentions this. Since the claim seems rather bold, would it be better to find a more academic/reliable source for this information? Manderson22 (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soft/processed foods leading to underdeveloped jaws 

message: how dangerous and painful it 172.56.240.72 (talk) 09:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wisdom teeth pain 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cpdus0923 (talk) 07:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGL A120 Critical Thinking
Talk:A House for Mr Biswas

message: Officially, it's "Mr", not "Mr.", in the title. Stan 12:27, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anyone substantiate this? The library of congress, the bibliography on the Nobel prize website, and Amazon.com list the title as "Mr. Biswas." I can't find any support for "Mr Biswas."Wik-e-wik (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Shouldn't the publication date refer to the first publication of the books (1961, Andre Deutsch)?
Also I don't see the point of the Editions section - it should either list all editions, or just in-print editions. At present it's unclear which of these it does.  JSatyamurthy (talk) 04:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, so fixed...GrahamHardy (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editions/publication date
Talk:Liliʻuokalani

message: The page is getting huge, byte size, and is getting kind of funky when I edit it.  145,250 bytes prior to my posting here.  Probably because of all the source links we've been adding.  I suggest we do a sub-page for the sourcing. Talk:Liliuokalani/Sources and move the pertinent threads there.  Feedback? — Maile  (talk) 21:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk page getting too huge to manage 

message: From Hawaii's Story by Hawaii's Queen:
KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trial and people who turned against the queen 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Liliuokalani, c. 1891.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 2, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-09-02. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:46, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Category talk:Drama

message: Note that we already have a Category:Theatre. The only possible distinction I can see is that Drama could be for plays as literature rather than productions... but most of the articles we've got aren't really divided up that way, so we'd und up cross-listing almost everything. I've been putting articles in Theatre and leaving this one alone for now. --Hob 13:28, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I would vote to merge the two.  Right now, Theatre and Drama are both subcats of Performing Arts, but Theatre is a subcat of Drama (or vice-versa).  Doesn't make sense.  --Ssilvers 01:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I might have a go at merging these in the next few days. Any objections, please shout now or forever hold your tongue. Bards 03:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy with Theatre?
Talk:Cassandra Claire

message: An AfD in July 2005 (see here) voted to make this page into a redirect to The Very Secret Diaries. I disagree with that decision and have restored the page as an actual article. My reasoning is as follows:
* The decision to redirect to The Very Secret Diaries was reasonably considering the article's content at the time the voting took place since the two pages had essentially the same content. However, the history of Cassandra Claire revealed a more substantive article.
* Cassandra Claire is clearly a notable author as established by the current version of the article and a Google test.
* She is not only notable for writing the Very Secret Diaries. The Draco Trilogy is also quite well known as established by the article and a Google test. Her original fiction is also soon to be published by a major publisher.
* If the two articles should be merged it makes much more sense to redirect The Very Secret Diaries here.
* The article may well become a target for vandalism or attempts at libel against its subject but that is not a criterion we use when deciding whether to keep articles. We will be able to stay on top of any such actions, I will personally do my best.
* The original vote largely consisted of new users apparently only interested in this topic.
* AfD does not have a mandate to irrevocably redirect articles.
I have restored the article and, with User:Arndisdunja's help, expanded it a little. I am going to contact User:BD2412, who closed the AfD at the time, and ask him to review my actions. — Haukur 19:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration of article
Talk:Spartacus (ballet)

message: this page is an orphan with little information ie: choreographer, year created, first cast etc etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohka- (talk • contribs)  23:15, 24 July 2004
The synopsis of this ballet is not quite accurate. I jumbles the acts and omits key scenes. Tweigert (talk) 21:18, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan

message: The ClassicalArchives.com link was out of date and so 'dead'. FWIW, the correct URL is now http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/2787.html#about. However, the info there is not entirely reliable (stating, for instance, that Symphony No. 2 "The Bell" dates from 1935!) so I am taking the liberty of replacing this link with one from the "Virtual Museum of...Aram Khachaturian". Alfietucker (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad link
Talk:Vivid (Living Colour album)

message: For the sake of simplicity and clarity, I would like to rename this article to Vivid (album) and move the disambig page from Vivid (disambiguation) to Vivid. I feel this would be more consistent and prevent mistaken links. If there are objections to this, I would like to discuss them. Thank you. -EdgarAllanToe 12:51, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed page move
Talk:Chicken Tonight

message: From VfD
Reads like an ad. Blue Mask 14:46, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1 link removed - Tv advert - No indication from clip information or uploader profile that the uploader had rights to the footage concerned, or was connected with the production entities responsible for it. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  You tube link removal. 

message: On label from NOV/2000 coded jar -- Brooke House, Crawley. RH10 2RQ -- Made in The EU ~~ 03:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Van der Bergh Foods Ltd
Talk:Adamson (automobile)

message: Hi Boccherini's Guitar - You started helping Wikipedia by adding useful information on automobile history - seemingly using "The Illustrated Encyclopaedia of Automobiles, edited by D Burgess Wise." 
It is an excellent source, really.  If you want to improve the internal linking of the Wikipedia, you might place your entries in the Category scheme. Just add the following tag to the bottom of the page when you're writing it:
*Category:Automobile manufacturers for car manufacturing companies
*Category:Automobiles for brands or models of car
Regards, --Millisits 15:04, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories
Template talk:Categories

message: I think in some ways the table of contents system we had back in the days of the old (uneditable) main page were better (although there are some improvements in the new toc too).  In particular when I started the Template:wikipediatoc it looked like this:
:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Template:Wikipediatoc&oldid=2530290
It has a certain simplicity that we can draw upon (in particular the natural sciences and mathematics should be grouped together). I'm glad this page is heading in that direction.  The current Template:wikipediatoc on the Main Page is overkill and looks more amateurish than the original, in particular stub articles like the unencyclopedic personal life aren't appropriate at the top-level and can easily be accomdated within a more encyclopedic subcategory.  I do agree that links to the categories are the best way to go on the main page, but before we go live, we should ensure that each category linked from the main page has at least a lead paragraph summarizing the relevant article of the same name.  --Lexor|Talk 15:11, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: Please see Wikipedia_talk:Browse by category for a discussion about merging Wikipedia:Browse by category with Template:Categories.  —AlanBarrett 17:15, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Wikipedia:Browse by category]] 

message: I have greatly expanded this template to give a broader view of categories and to eliminate some of the problems I percieved in the old design.  Summary of what I've done.
*Made entertainment as seperate section, as it is the largest section of culture.
*Made geography a seperate section, with each of the worlds continents.
*Turned abtractions into Mathematics and abstractions, with more maths related topics.
*Better category organization in general. 
Norm 14:43, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of this template. 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... Sorry, my bad. Didn't see previous revisions) --Rarkenin (talk) 13:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:No More Shall We Part

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 23:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: My UK copy of the Bonus disk includes a full video of "God is in the house" and not the other listed videos. The video gives a shooting date of 21st September 2000 includes shots of the inside and outside of Westside studios. The article is either wrong or perhaps your country version is different.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peeky (talk • contribs) 15:21, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bonus Disk Track listing

message: I'm not sure what genre I would suggest, but "post-punk" is definetely wrong!  Toby Douglass (talk) 13:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are we sure the word 'folk' or some variant has no place here?--45.72.199.248 (talk) 13:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 
Talk:Nocturama (album)

message:  --Qirex 14:03, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I don't have an academic source right now, but "Little Ghost Song" is said to be a remix of "Right Out of Your Hand". If someone can find a source that would be great, as it's worth pointing out since it otherwise seems like a non-album, exclusive song. YouCanDoBetter (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Little Ghost Song"
Talk:Treaty of Devol

message: Changed 1054 (??) to 1097, the correct year. 13 Nov 2005
:Thanks...that was some leftover vandalism from June 22-23, when it was on the main page. Adam Bishop 19:07, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you suggest it be made more comprehensive? Adam Bishop 22:17, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: An FAC doesn't have to be lengthy. This article seems to be very comprhenisve for something done in the 1100's. Falphin 18:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short 

message: Is there some picture for beginning of article?--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 10:49, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Peter Schreier

message: I had sent an e-mail to the address given at , and Marijke was so nice to respond and authorize publication of the article on Wikipedia (under the GFDL):
From: "M.H. Halberstadt"
Subject: Re: Article on Peter Schreier on Wikipedia
I am Marijke and I posted this article. I've posted it in the German version too, and
that article was also blocked because of this copyright question.
I'm now un-copyvioing the article. Lupo 12:06, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? No! 

message: I've removed the two unreferenced TV productions. I hope this is ok. Grimes2 (talk) 12:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced TV production removed 

message: I can't seem to find any info about this, but his son's names were Torsten and Ralf; could this have been a tribute to the great heroic tenor Torsten Ralf, one of the leading dramatic tenors of the previous generation?  HandsomeMrToad (talk) 02:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indeed! https://www.musik-in-dresden.de/2015/07/29/peter-schreier-80/ Grimes2 (talk) 08:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  His sons' names: a tribute?
Category talk:Birmingham, West Midlands/Archive 1

message: As there is no clear consensus on this topic, why don't we just start a vote? I wrote all the articles that I think should be removed from this category down and also added what connection they have with Birmingham I found on the corresponding articles. --Conti|✉ 01:09, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
Wizzard, Spencer Davis Group, Dexy's Midnight Runners, Charlatans UK, Musical Youth, Bentley Rhythm Ace, Duran Duran and Black Sabbath are all bands that were formed in Birmingham. No special connection between Birmingham and these bands is mentioned in any of the articles, so I've put them all into one vote.
*Keep:
*Remove:
#Conti|✉ 01:52, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
#PMcM 00:25, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal
Talk:Giant golden-crowned flying fox

message: This is my original article based on various information I gathered from newspapers and online articles.
There was no copy & paste done. No plagiarism.
There is absolutely no copyright violation here. If you are still itching to pull the trigger, contact me first so that we can avoid another deadlock Latorilla 18:34, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has numerous issues (needs wikification, more citations, attention from an expert). I personally think that attention from an expert in the field would solve most, if not all of them.--Toepoaster (talk) 03:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 

message: Unfortunately it appears the main image is upside down, was the editor that included this particular file as blind as the eponymous creatures in question? Somebody please correct this asap.  78.151.41.124 (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant Image Problems 

message: Removed image from page after Im a teapot questioned its species.
: 
I'm not a zoologist and can't make any useful comment about the species beyond that it looks significantly different to the image in the infobox. Pseudomonas(talk) 15:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks very much for removing the image and acting so quickly. Im a teapot (talk) 22:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of questioned species
Talk:Mon Chéri

message: should be added "boero" reference
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boero_(dolce)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.55.20.114 (talk) 10:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

message: The link from a type of chcolate praline to Home Alone 2 is so tenuous as to be non-existent. There would be one incredibly long list if we include all mentions of "mon chéri/ma cherie" in popular English language culture. Funny anecdote? Yes. Relevance = 0! 
Ferrero Mon Chéri is a registered product and comes in two versions one for the US and another for the ROW. It is not a line of chocolates. Thus it is a particular product in the US and a different particular product in the rest of the world. A line of products would be Ferrero's Kinder line (Kinder Chocolate, Kinder Surprise, Kinder Bueno et al).
85.22.2.25 16:14, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture reference 

message: where can i find mon cheri hazulnut.love them and cant find them around where is live is there a chain store that cares them in amarica,usa
rockker65@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockker65 (talk • contribs) 03:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  stores 

message: Is there no connection, however tenuous, to the use of "Mon Chéri" as the brand name for the confection and the fact that the filling is cherry?  Or is this simply a cross-language coincidence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Partnerfrance (talk • contribs) 14:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mon "Cherry"? 
Talk:Kirlian photography

message: To a large extent, It has been used in alternative medicine research.
Is there a piece of an earlier sentence missing here? — MaxEnt 19:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  To a large extent 

message: ″these claims are unsupported by the scientific community″
Claims are either supported by evidence or not supported by evidence.
The scientific community doesn't "support" or "unsuppoort" anything. Maybe it either accepts or rejects, but these are weasel words.
Suggest either 
these claims are unsupported by evidence
or
these unsupported claims are rejected by the scientific community
BioImages2000 (talk) 18:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to "rejected". --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: The current section on the torn leaves experiments seems out of date with regard to the claims of Kirlian Photography/Aura proponents - they're now claiming that the missing portions of the leaf will appear even on an entirely fresh setup, which has never been in contact with the intact leaf and thus could not be contaminated with moisture.
Obviously this seems physically implausible, but it should at least be mentioned. I added a citation to that effect, from a pseudoscience/alt-medicine journal, but it was removed as an unreliable source. Surely such a journal is a reliable source for their own claims? - 212.129.80.227 (talk) 10:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because of WP:FRINGE, it cannot stand alone, without any mainstream comments from better sources. Wikipedia does not collect crazy claims from all sorts of people that have not got any attention from science. --Hob Gadling (talk) 11:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torn Leaves & Moisture