lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Christ the Lord Is Risen Today

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 21:05, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: I redlinked the term Processional hymn, and it was replaced with a Wictionary link to the word  processional. While I appreciate the effort, I don't think it solves the problem. I (and presumably most Wikipedia readers) know what a "procession" is and I know what "processional" means. That is not the problem. The problem is that "Processional hymn" appears to be a special term in some churches, but I have no idea what. So it needs to be explained - either in this article, or in a yet-to-be-written Processional hymn article. So I intend to revert the edit. Peter Ballard (talk) 10:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It turns out there is a pretty good article Procession, so I've linked to that. Peter Ballard (talk) 12:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Processional hymn 

message: The article, at a glance, looks like about a painting. I suggest:
* Make the image part of an infobox, to show it's a hymn, not a painting
* Give the correct title of that painting, Ascension
* Explain in the caption the relation of the painting to the hymn.
My view: the painting has nothing to do with Easter, but Ascension. Better don't use it at all. ----Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree Gerda. It was already in there when I made the initial expansion, I don't mind if we change it.  The C of E   God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: It would be good if the actual music could be pointed to (in addition to citing names and authors of tunes) MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunes
Talk:Phi Ta Khon

message: * So why would we want to merge articles about two completely different festivals, held in different places at different times? I'm a little puzzled. Mark1 07:29, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why merge?
Talk:Duffel coat

message: Since the name derives from Duffel and the two spellings are interchangeable, I'd have thought that the article should be at Duffel coat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.82.42 (talk) 20:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Is there actually such a thing as "genuine duffel" nowadays? Is it not simply coarse woollen cloth? Or is there actually a product called "duffel" that is still made in the eponymous town and marketed as such? 
My duffel coat, which is a Gloverall 512c classic and as authentic as they come (for a contemporary duffle coat at least), is 80% wool and 20% nylon.Spiridens (talk) 00:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Genuine Duffel" 

message: This article, at times, reads like a Gloverall advertisement. Something ought to be done about this. Thomasmilliken (talk) 05:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The article currently reads:
:Field Marshal Montgomery was a famous wearer of the coat, as a means of identifying himself with his troops, leading to another nickname, "Monty coat".
This immediately struck me as dubious because when I picture Bernard Montgomery, I picture various kinds of military wear, but not a duffle coat. It is certainly true that Montgomery was famous and it is apparently also true that he wore a duffle coat on a few occasions. But it was not a typical attire of his. There are probably thousands of photographs of him, but I find it hard to find more than two or three that show him wearing a duffle coat. So it seems rather more likely that the coat was named after him because his name was used as a shorthand for the British military leadership. Or whatever else – but not because he wore the coat. The sentence is sourced to an Italian fashion school, but the link does not work anymore. I believe that is not a credible source for such a historical statement, or certainly not sufficient in the light of the reasons to doubt the claim I have outlined. --SKopp (talk) 20:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the Italian version of this wikipedia article of course uses the Italian name for the garment, which is il montgomery 91.84.112.39 (talk) 21:23, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montgomery
Talk:Buncheong

message: In the chart showing the different types of decoration, there is possibly inaccuracy and poorly defined terminology. Several of the terms towards the end are not defined at all. Also the term "bakji" is described in other sources (MET museum primer of white porcelains of the Joseon Era) as Baekja and refers to white porcelain and NOT slipped Buncheong stoneware. Other sources (Korean Ceramics, the Beauty of Natural Forms. KF Essentials No11) states that sgraffito buncheong is called Johwa and not Bakji. This article would definitely benefit from attention of an expert on this subject. 209.93.146.80 (talk) 12:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of Terminology
Talk:Gwangju Metro Line 1

message: The list of station mentions Hwajeong Station, which is actually located in Seoul, not Gwangju. If there is a Hwajeong Station in Gwangju (the exact same name as the one in Seoul), the link in the article leads to the station at Seoul, which I find very misleading. Someone should do something about the link and the station list on the article. NHRHS2010 |  Talk to me   17:40, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hwajeong Station 
Talk:Tony Harnell

message: yes its the same Tony Harnell
A way to tell: listen to Sonic's SA1 theme and Between the tigers or any other TNT song with Harnell's vocals. The vocal style is alike after all. Just in case youre confused. Glad to clear that up.Ollie the Magic Skater 18:00, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic Adventure 

message: I believe it to be notable that Tony was in Pennsylvania band Precious Metal (not the female-only band) in 1982/1983, a band that also featured Cinderella guitarist Jeff Labar and Heavens Edge guitarist Reggie Wu in later incarnations. I see that a band named Jackals is mentioned without citation and the same sentence mentions an unnamed guitarist without any earlier reference. Can these issues be addressed? Jimbohamilton (talk) 20:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tony's early bands
Talk:Theory Z

message: Can anyone assist me in answering a question.The Question, was William Ouchi a thief...a copier of other,s works.
Seems to me,he had the benefit of maslow /mcgregor etc,
His Z theory,seems more laid back,yet just a helpful to ,someone,rather than employ X or Y,
Someone believes,that William stole all his ideas,yet his ethos,is far more acceptable(i would have thought to the majority of people)
can anyone help me please
—±Paul
MacGregor and Ouchi have two separate theories. I believe that a reference on the page is adequate and avoids confusion by having too much information on one page (as sparse as it is at the moment). My vote is to keep the theories as separate entries.
Davidl9999 18:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  william Ouchi 

message: Theory Z does not coincide with X & Y. However, a "link" reference would be apropriate.
More so I would think X & Y would be complemented by other works re motivational theory and its related success, ie "The Six Sigma Way" by Cunningham, etal, and promoted by GE's Jack Welch.  This application directly relates to worker quality, product quality, warranty costs, and profitability.
One may also want to make reference to Tom Peters and his book "In Search of Excelence"; management theory, management's worker relations, and the infamous "MBWA" - critical management technique...... a Theory Z reference at this point may flow into the subject.—Preceding unsigned comment added by WW Hagerty (talk • contribs) 
Regardless of who first used the phrase, "Theory Z" does not seem appropriately defined in this article, especially when compared with Theory X and Theory Y.  Theory X suggests an inherent lack of motivation and responsibility while Theory Y suggests inherent motivation and individual responsibility.  "Theory Z" (if placed in this context) should address the core issues: motivation and responsibility... which in this article it doesn't, at least not as it relates to being inherent (or human nature).  A more appropriate definition would state that Theory Z people are inherently motivated but not inherently responsible.  These folks may be great task masters, but only if the task is well defined and they are not responsible for the outcome.  The contrary would not likely exist and therefore needs no label.  It seems unreasonable to find someone who is not inherently motivated but assumes responsibility.  99.7.54.0 (talk) 04:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship to theories X & Y

message: "These theories have proven with many fortune 500 companies and others that when applied, do improve quality and productivity and also help to strengthen company labor issues." (In section numner 2.)
Does not seem neutrap pow, academical language, it more sounds like a marketing/advertisment. 
And even the meaning of "many fortune 500 companies" seems unclear to me.
94.66.139.6 (talk) 20:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: the sentence below
Talk:Rae Report

message: Don't get me wrong. I hate the Rae Report as much as any good Ontario lefty should. But as written, this article comes dangerously close to reading like a CFS press release. Neutral POV kind of demands that we not write the article under the assumption that all readers automatically favour lower tuition fees and oppose deregulation, doesn't it? Bearcat 07:56, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:The Killer in Me

message: Please help complete the Angel/Buffy episode articles. See what needs to be done on this sub-page of WikiProject Buffy:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Buffy/Episodes
Also please help update any major changes made to episode articles on that page so that progress can be mapped.
________________________________________________________
IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ
Before any of you rewrite this page from scratch, please let's discuss it. Changes are OK and welcome, provided that they contribute to improve the article. However, subjective changes added for no good reason are very annoying for authors and discourage contribution. Please, let's work together, not against each other. Thank you.
Doppelgängland 08:17, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: New section for plot summary; much shorter then Expanded Overview, intense work on merging trivia please. I'd do it myself but I'm short on time and brainpower. Lots42 (talk) 10:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions And Stuff 

message: I've removed this speculative opinion piece, and moved it here to give reasons.
*Buffy and Spike return to the Initiative to find painkillers for Spike. However, Spike was captured by the Initiative in "Wild at Heart", then wakes up in his cell at the beginning of "The Initiative" not knowing where he is and promptly escapes - he didn't even know about the implant until he tried to bite Willow and couldn't. Thus, there were no experiments or meds for him to remember.
He didn't have to "remember" anything, he could have found out from Riley or Buffy or simply added up from the nature of the labs afterward (or anything he may have learned from Adam). 
*Furthermore, in the penultimate episode of Season 4, the government overseers rule that the former Initiative base would be filled with cement to hide evidence of its existence, but in this episode Buffy and Spike find they had not done so.
And of course no contractor in the history of the world has ever taken the money to do something and then counted on lax oversight resulting in no-one at the top finding out that it wasn't done, 'cause that never happens, right? Britmax (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Either way, the second one is not a continuity error, it is a retcon. Lots42 (talk) 01:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuity violation
Talk:History of juggling

message: This article is an overview of historical juggling information which has presumably been taken from a number of sources. It would benefit from a bibliography or list of references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.22.144.198 (talk • contribs) 08:22, 18 July 2005
It is my intention to make this article a proper history of juggling rather than just a list of unreferenced dates. It will be an edit over time. Please discuss my changes here before reverting. Thanks Robynthehode (talk) 16:01, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References needed

message: As that article seems to be bound for deletion, I made a snapshot: http://web.archive.org/web/20151222231656/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juggling_in_ancient_China I'm afraid, the references will be lost ( I'm not also retrieving these from the text. Are you? :o) ). --217.84.70.156 (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, good. I was careful to copy over all the references when I merged the China article, so we shouldn't lose anything. Are you ok with deleting Juggling in ancient China? It just seemed better to bring everything together in one place here. - Fortpinepitch (talk) 00:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, "okay with deleting" .. sure! I'm just a passerby ;o) --217.84.70.139 (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  wayback-snapshot of merged article "Juggling in ancient China" 

message: After reading the chapter on juggling in ancient times from Karl-Heinz Ziethen's 4000 Years of Juggling, I decided to dig deeper and find primary source references for Ziethen's many juggling artifacts and quotes. Another source, which appears to have also been one of Ziethen's main sources, is a 1907 article by Arthur Watson published in The Reliquary and Illustrated Archaeologist. The information I have added to this wiki page attempts to expand on the foundation laid by Watson and Ziethen. Unfortunately, the information on modern juggling history is still very minimal, so I hope that someone can step up and help flesh out that section. -Fortpinepitch (talk) 23:51, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for ancient juggling history research 
Talk:Kimiko Hahn

message: For what-ever reason, Wik did not record me as having written this even though I logged on. (Kdammers)67.188.221.2 08:26, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Unicoherent space

message: Mathworld.wolfram.com claims that the definition is "for any closed and connected A,B such that A cup B = X, the set A cap B is connected." Since I have not seen the definition anywhere else, I did not dare correct Wikipedia.
There seem to be two problems (1) the lack of the requirement connected for A and B. (2) Calling A,B a partition even if A cap B may not be empty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.167.195.60 (talk) 08:27, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:George Dalgarno

message: Javirl 11:16, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

message: :
These are different concepts; to choose between them, I'd need to know a bit more about his purposes. —Tamfang (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They are different concepts now, but at the time (1600s) universality is pretty much what all the philosophical languages were going for. (Or looking for the original 'Adamic language', but I think they'd consider that roughly equivalent to 'universal'.) See e.g. Leibniz's similar work at around the same period. I don't know Dalgarno's, but it's a reasonable guess that it was doing the same.  --Sai ¿?✍ 00:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  what kind of language? 
Talk:Lunar year

message: should probably be merged with lunar calendar. dab (ᛏ) 08:52, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. Would the articles Year and Calendar be merged? I doubt. --Spring Dennis 06:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another possibility is to merge with Month. Lunokhod 22:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Dbachmann has proposed that Lunar year be merged with Lunar calendar. Please give your opinions below.
:not for any fundamental reason, just because the articles are similar in scope and both very short; if they should grow in size significantly, they can always be separated again. No big deal as far as I am concerned. dab (𒁳) 13:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: for the record, I had completely overlooked the fact that I had made the same proposal before, back in July 2005, just above. dab (𒁳) 20:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: For (weak): I support this proposal for the following reasons. First, at the present time, it is not clear to me how the lunar year stub will ever be exapanded to a full article. Second, the lunar year and lunar calendar are definitely related, and it doesn't seem too logical to discuss the lunar calendar without discussing the lunar year. Finally, I think that the merged article would be more informative. Nevertheless, If the lunar year and lunar calendar topics ever are expanded to the point where a division into two articles is warranted, I would also be for such a re-division. Lunokhod 15:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge - The two articles cover material that is similar enough that they should be merged together.  Dr. Submillimeter 17:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: merge: the two concepts are closely related to each other and it's somewhat strange that lunar calendar doesn't mention lunar years in the text. Tocharianne 17:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Lunar year]] with [[Lunar calendar]]
Talk:Passing of Shoghi Effendi

message: Any thoughts on maybe changing the name to something a little more specific? As a Baha'i I get what you mean, but its a little vague, let alone a little airy-fairy for someone else? -- Tomhab 09:17, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'm the one who named it, and I ran into this problem. This was the wording that best described a situation which focused on his death, and not just some information of his death. I don't know. Whatever. Cunado19 10:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Successorship of ...". It largely concentrates on his successorship... -- Tomhab 14:18, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:OOCL

message: OOCL Shenzhen was at delivery in May 2003 the largest Containership in the world?...sorry but that's wrong. The Axel Maersk delivered March 2003 was greater in Loa, tdw, TEU. see article Containerschiff in the german wikipedia. July, 18th.2005 DEF
:The Axel Maersk was, in fact, longer than the OOCL Shenzhen. However, officially, the OOCL Shenzhen carried 8,063 TEUs, whilst the Axel Maersk carried only 6,600 TEUs - a 1,463 difference. Container ships are measured by their capacity to carry containers. This is why the Guiness Book of World Records recognized the OOCL Shenzhen as the largest container ship ever built on its delivery in 2003. GCM 07:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest container ship

message: Why are some of the ships called OCCL and not OOCL?
Nostrada (talk) 23:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This was a typographic error, see OOCL vessel list on OOCL webpage. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 18:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OOCL and OCCL ? 

message: I've added several reference links, are they meet the requirements to remove the Unreferenced tag?Nhan 15:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: For example, shipping IT system/solution provider - CargoSmart - is owned by OOCL. Should such "(in)vested" and/or wholly-owned subsidiaries be listed?
CargoSmart mainly provide sailing schedules search and schedule reliability analysis for NVOs, LSPs and BCOs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fishandchips (talk • contribs) 02:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: OOCL vested companies
Talk:Michael Resnik

message: I happened upon the entry under my name and found the box stating that the article contains unsubstantiating claims about a living person and references are needed. Due to a conflict of interest, I cannot correct or edit the article myself. The following is given to aid future editing. 
 
I don't know who created the entry about me. I see that it has evolved. And now that there is a marker about unsupported claims. All the claims about my date of birth,education, and accademic employment can be verified by going to the UNC Philosophy Department website and looking under my name under the Emeritus Professors. There is a link to my CV there. (Of course, it is just a piece of paper supporting another piece of paper. How else can one verify my birthdate and place of birth except via a piece of paper!)
Other than that there is the claim that I am a leading philosophy of mathematics and decision theory. I would delete the words "decision theory". Although I have received emails and verbal communications praising my book, Choices, it is an introduction to decision theory and logical and philosophical issues concerning it. Other than that I have not made important contributions to decision theory. 
As to the claim that I am a leading contemporary philosopher of mathematics, I think that this is fair. Sections of philosophy of mathematics reference books, Shapiro's Thinking About Mathematics, and his Handbook of Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics, are devoted to mathematical structuralism and my articulation of it. In any case, one could revise the claim so that is factual and less evaluative and simply says that I am a philosopher of mathematics. 
Finally, I am now in the land grading business and reside in Chatham County, NC. This can be verified by going to my website, www.collinsmountaingrading.com. 
MDResnik (talk) 00:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of MPs elected in the 1987 United Kingdom general election

message: This article talks about a person called Sean Hughes, and links to Sean Hughes. The link is a suspected Provisional IRA member who is still alive.
I presume that the Sean Hughes in this article is neither the suspected Provo or the comedian as he died in 1990.
Having never heard of an MP called Sean Hughes I'd be happier leaving changes to someone better informed.
--JimmyTheWig 09:45, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Your're very much correct. I've taken it on as a miniproject to disambiguate all the Sean Hughes references in Wikipedia, in this case I have linked to Sean Hughes (politician), which as yet doesn't exist. M A Mason 00:30, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussions
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/LA1

message: Did we settle on a restaurant? Do we have a time? Should we send out reminders? Are there any projects/discussion topics/games that we should organize? Door prizes? -Willmcw 06:51, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
:Anyone know anything about Wiki bots?  We could really use a bot that could post reminders to attending users' talk pages.  - Eric 09:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One problem is that you should have created this page as a page move from the old page since that way everybody who had put the old page on their watchlist would catch any changes to the page. As for 'bots, User:AllyUnion is one of the Wikipedia experts on bots, but I understand that many of them had problems with the last upgrade to the MediaWiki software. BlankVerse ∅ 11:14, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reminder

message: I will bring some signs, a camera, and an attendance sheet. My suggestions on stuff to do:
#Self-introductions
#A trivia game - I'm currently writing one - anyone with a good trivia question should e-mail it to me at eric at ericshalov.com. (Please put "wiki or wikipedia" somewhere in the body of the message.)
#Call for speakers - anyone want to give a 5-10 minute talk about an area they find particularly interesting, or that less experienced Wikipedians may benefit from?  i.e. Worst Wiki pet peeves and how to avoid them?  How to resolve edit conflicts, vandalism, problems with other Wikipedians... Current status of a WikiProject... History of Wiki...  etc.. ?  - Eric 11:10, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff to do