lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mirabilandia

message: * Someone REWROTE this article from the italian park to cover the brasilian... --89.0.10.69 (talk) 19:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Would it be possible to split the subject into two articles, like it is done on the French wiki ? See : fr:Mirabilandia (Brésil),  fr:Mirabilandia.--Jik jik (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh sorry. I have no ambiton to write articles on the English wiki. My English is not good enough. I just found out and resolved the confusion across the various Interwikis and found out that the French wiki is the only one, which handels both subjects (Italian and Brasilian park) in parallel. As the first complain in discussion appeared, that the article was originally describing the Italian park and was overwriten by the Brasilian one, I just wanted to give the proposal to "exhume" the original version (Italian park) from the article history and let both articles live in parallel. But I am for sure not going to do it by myself.--Jik jik (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article version  shall be probably the best starting point for the article about the Italian park.--Jik jik (talk) 05:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  So far no other one did, I tried to preform the page split according to my proposal.--Jik jik (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: On the page Talk:Mirabilandia I described the reasons why I think that it is resonable to handle the topics Mirabilandia (Brasil) and Mirabilandia (Italy) separately. If I did something wrong in sense of the standard processes (copying instead of redirect), I am sorry, and I would appreciate and help and correction. The final state accroding to my opinion shall be :
* Mirabilandia (Brasil) : separate page based on the version of Mirabilandia page dated 19:14, 28 April 2011
* Mirabilandia (Italy) : separate page based on the version of Mirabilandia page dated 18:25, 20 May 2010
* Mirabilandia : shall serve as disambiguation page
--Jik jik (talk) 17:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Gardaland

message: I love Gardaland so much, it's my namesake! --Funny Gardaland (talk) 09:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gardaland 
Talk:Cavallino Matto

message: The language of this article needs a good revision. barbarajacob 12:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jarāmaraṇa

message: The Burmese characters for "Jaramarana" are wrong; they say "jati" instead. I don't have the correct font installed, so I can't correct it myself. Someone else should. :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.83.213 (talk) 21:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Burmese is wrong
Talk:Blue-light hazard

message: Here are some book sources about the "blue-light hazard".  Most of them hyphenate blue-light here, since it's a compound used as an adjective; that is, the hazard is about blue light, rather than it being a light hazard that is blue.  So I'll move the article to conform to this basic English grammar convention. Dicklyon 23:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and punctuation
Talk:Space World

message: Are we sure Alien Panic opened in April 2005? I visited the park in 2004 and Alien Panic (or at least the same attraction under a different name, the walkthrough attraction in which an alien leaps out at you at the end) was there and open to visitors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kinketsu (talk • contribs) 14:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When did the Space Eye Ferris wheel open? 92.11.238.139 (talk) 22:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Nara Dreamland

message: Viper isn't a wooden coaster.  There's no possible way that the wooden coaster Aska could be similar. ****nefariousski
:While this is a three year old comment, and the comparison has been replaced, it should be noted that Viper that was compared is the one at Six Flags Great America, which like the wooden coaster that was at Dreamland, is a clone of the Coney Island Cyclone.oknazevad (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added a section about it's popularity with Urban explorers, properly cited
nagoyablue (talk) 04:29, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Urbex
Talk:Hanayashiki

message: I have used 1949 as the opening date for the theme park based on data used in the Japanese wiki article infobox. A review of the Japanese article suggests that several dates could be argued as the opening date of the park. The evidence in the Japanese article suggests that 1949 is the date the current theme park opened after being damaged during WW2. 
There are other data in the Japanese wiki article that could be included in the infobox but this was not not done at this time. A thorough review of the references in the Japanese wiki article is needed before any additional data is used in the  English article infobox. Dr.khatmando (talk) 01:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox data
Talk:Helen Palmer (writer)

message: She fails WP:BIO, and as she is primarily notable for her relationship to Geisel, redirection there makes the most sense (like how Jason Allen Alexander redirects to Britney Spears, for lack of a better example). It makes more sense to redirect this page than simply delete it outright. Mr. Absurd (talk) 01:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't reinstate it again, but feel that as the author of 14 books, several of which are part of an notable series, she can be seen to merit an article of her own. Bongomatic (talk) 01:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think she's notable enough, then it'd be great if you could add some info the article to assert notability (which it doesn't do too well in its current state.) Mr. Absurd (talk) 19:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection

message: To add to this article: approximately when Geisel and Dimond began having an affair. 98.123.38.211 (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Gerald Domingue

message: Interesting subject. However, writing an autobiography on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged, unless your writing has been approved by other editors in the community. For further information, please see Wikipedia:Autobiography. As the subject may still be notable enough, I'd suggest that the article be partly rewritten. -- Camptown 23:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Gerald and Palbert, I removed the autobio tag, but I still think that the article looks somewhat biased is style and should be slightly rewritten. Consider editing - just to mention ONE example - the following unsourced statement: Domingue was born and raised in rural, Acadian Louisiana, where, it has been suggested, his natural surroundings stimulated his creativity and played a role in his development as a painter. And is it, e.g. necessary to point out that Dominigue is an accomplished poet? And is it really notable that Domingue is the father of three daughters, Andrea, Yvonne, Michelle; two sons, Gerald, Jr. and Marcel Gerard; he has one granddaughter, four grandsons and one great-granddaughter.? Basically, however, I think Palbert has done a great job, and the article can only get better. --Camptown 22:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiography
Talk:Helen Smith (nurse)

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United Kingdom § Indiscriminate changes of "UK citizen" to "British citizen".  Peaceray (talk) 05:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United Kingdom#Indiscriminate changes of "UK citizen" to "British citizen"|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United Kingdom §&nbsp;Indiscriminate changes of "UK citizen" to "British citizen"]]
Talk:Capri (town)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Capri, Campania →  – Per WP:PLACEDAB, Capri, the island is also in Campania. There are a number of other settlements called "Capri" but none of them appear to be towns, all seem to be small settlements or suburbs and none have articles here anyway. Crouch, Swale (talk)  18:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 December 2021
Talk:The Wild Party (LaChiusa musical)

message: Partially ported info from the The Wild Party (poem) entry, new infoboxes, etc. I am aware that at the moment there are no citations and some material that could be considered original research, but I will be adding to the entry in the next few days to make it more encyclopedic. Just got tired of seeing this and the Lippa version on the "to-do" list!  I saw this one on Broadway during its short run and will be digging up my Playbill and other articles I know of. I actually have a reasonable amount of info with which to flesh this out. However, I'm not very good at the image-upload thing, so if anyone else has any images they want to add, please do so! ChrisStansfield Contribs 23:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great start!  -- Ssilvers 02:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I added a brief summary of the plot and a description of the characters. I also changed some of the formats (awards and nominations, cast list) to conform to what seems to be the standard style used in musical theatre articles. I added the sequence titles to the song list. I removed the reference to Eartha Kitts "11 o'clock number" because while the expression is understood by musical theatre fans it would be a mystery to the average reader, and there's no Wikipedia article describing it that could be linked to explain the term. I would be careful about adding more images since this has become a hot topic lately. ConoscoTutto 14:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also corrected the links in other articles so they would link here instead of the article about the original poem. ConoscoTutto 15:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:The Wild Party (Lippa musical)

message: I actually know very little about this show, but I was porting the LaChiusa one from the same entry, so i figured I'd start a stub for someone who knows a bit more to work on. Take it away! ChrisStansfield Contribs 23:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I expanded the article with a very brief description of the plot, a list of song titles, and critical reception. I removed the comment that the character of Kate wasn't in the Broadway version, because she was. ConoscoTutto 16:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a detailed synopsis and a picture and I think this qualifies as "start" now. If I'm wrong, please revert to "stub." Thank you. ConoscoTutto 21:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ōryōki

message: -----
I have compared the content of this article with the linked article on the Japanese Wikipedia page and found some differences. In particular, according to the Japanese article, ōryōki is the set of bowls and utensils, and there is no reference to the use of the word ōryōki to refer to the practice of meditative eating (this is not given a name, and simply called "meals using ōryōki". I suspect that this reflects a difference in usage between Japanese and English: in Japanese, ōryōki has the mundane meaning of a set of utensils (this is consistent with the suffix -ki meaning "utensil" or "instrument") and when the word was brought into English, it acquired the more profound meaning of the related ceremonial eating practices. My edit is mostly a change of emphasis. The information I have added is not supported by sources other than the Japanese Wikipedia, but since Wikipedia policy is to be bold in making edits, I have made them anyway, so that others can decide whether to keep them. 180.12.112.57 (talk) 04:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Pīti

message: I have removed the parts which were saying that piti is physical, this is just wrong. There is no clear division here canonically. The Buddhist literature rather divides the body into five skandas. Piti is defined as a samskara and sukha as a vedana (as shown by the Buddhaghosa quote in this article), it is best to stick to these terms. 
Notably, samskaras can be bodily and mental, and in the five skanda scheme they often define volitions or intentions. So piti cannot be just physical. This article was probably confusing a ton of meditators lol!
Javierfv1212 (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Piti is not physical
Talk:Castellabate

message: — Assignment last updated by Natharris (talk) 04:08, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Humanities
Talk:Death of a Princess

message: This article doesn't mention the name of the person the film is about. I suggest that only having a name in the caption of the picture is unhelpful. It leaves the reader to *infer* that this is the name of "a Princess."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.238.31 (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names? 

message: What this context does state, is that most any of the participants, from the UK, Sweden to Australia, including the Saudi crown itself, are soft ' shell/tissue ', and that, is an instance that will continue and continue till kingdom come.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.92.252.145 (talk) 21:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmm. 
Talk:BLRT Western Shipyard

message: I've moved this page from Baltijos laivų statykla to "Baltija Shipbuilding Yard" as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Article titles. This suggests we "should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize", while this has "Use the most commonly used English version of the name". So I have. Xyl 54 (talk) 02:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Sampajañña

message: I think this page should be merged with the Mindfulness (Buddhism) page, since they mean the exact same thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Makeswell (talk • contribs) 06:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They don't mean exactly the same thing. But they almost always occur together. I think the distinction is brought out well in Nyanatiloka's Buddhist Dictionary. Sati is awareness in the moment, and sampajañña is continuity of awareness (or continuity of purpose as it is sometimes called). This may not amount to enough of a distinction to keep separate articles, but the world "mindfulness" tends to hide a great deal of subtlety in the underlying terminology of Buddhism. mahaabaala (talk) 08:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  to be Merged with Mindfulness (Buddhism) 

message: I changed the Sanskrit spelling after checking the Edgerton's Dictionary of Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit, and Monier-Williams' Sanskrit-English Dictionary. It is samprajanya which is sampajañña in Pāli; the conjunct nya regularly devolving to the geminate ññā. mahaabaala (talk) 08:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanskrit Spelling
Talk:Saṅkhāra

message: I sincerely doubt that many people who had no experience with Buddhist philosophy could learn the meaning of 'sankhara' by reading this page. The explanation of the term in the article seems to be simultaneously overcomplicated and uninformative.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.200.69.146 (talk) 03:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, please don't forget to sign your comments. Wikipedia is free to edit. Please be WP:BOLD and effect the changes yourself as you see fit. Other editors whose expertise is Buddhism would also be happy to help you. You may bring this matter up to WP:BUDDHISM if you have any suggestions or concerns. You don't need an account to do this, but having an account is preferable. Cheers, a fellow Buddhist. 舎利弗 (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Anyone seems poorly explained this article can refer to pages like Karma in Buddhism, Pratītyasamutpāda, and Caitasika. Have a nice day!Kalakannija (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems poorly explained 

message: The lede suggested only that Sankhara were anicca - and said nothing about anatta/dukkha - I have modified this gross omission 20040302 (talk) 17:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  change to lede 

message: On the talk page for Samskara (Indian philosophy), there have been multiple requests for a merger with this page Sankhara.
Some of us think this is a good idea (see the talk page).
Others contend that the two concepts are different and that having one page for the Hinduism concept and another for the Buddhist concept is better.
What do people think?
Lastly the modifier 'Indian philosophy' is a bit redundant. After all both are originally Indian philosophies. It may make more sense to change it to (Hinduism) or something similar.
Alexkyoung (talk) 18:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree with merge: Some overlapping content is not in itself reason enough for merger, especially if merger would lead to a very large article. Both articles have many reliable sources, much content, and are sufficiently differentso no merge is required.--Farang Rak Tham  (Talk) 18:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

text: 'Disagree with rename: the article Samskara (Indian philosophy) does mention many forms of Indian philosophy, some of which are not always qualified as Hinduism.--Farang Rak Tham  (Talk) 18:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Samskara?
Talk:Lord Mayor of Newcastle (New South Wales)

message: The name of the Lord Mayor makes it clear that it is the Australian Newcastle that is intended here, not the English one. --RichardVeryard 23:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Newcastle? 

message: I have traced back edit histories and found out that the Stub article page was merged into City of Newcastle and later converted to a redirect to List of mayors and lord mayors of Newcastle. Snowman (talk) 11:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Sukha

message: Based on this article's Pali title (sukha) and my own knowledge limitations, I've developed this article in terms of Buddhism's Pali literature.  While I plan to continue to expand it along these lines presently, I can appreciate that others might want to expand this article further in one or more of the following manners:
* include Buddhist post-Pali-canonical Sanskrit sources
* include non-Buddhist Sanskrit material
* include Buddhist non-Pali, non-Sanskrit material (as has already been started by the inclusion of the Tibetan correlate for sukha)
If any of these are done, I request that the bulk of the current material (e.g., from the section currently entitled "General life pursuit" to "Feeling attribute") be subsumed under a level-2 title such as "From the Pali literature."  I think this would be intellectually cleaner than, for instance, attempting to intermix other tradition's ideas under each of the existing sectional titles.  
In addition, if non-Pali, non-Sanskrit (e.g., Tibetan) material is added, then I would like to suggest that this article be moved to something like Happiness (Buddhism), although I intuit that such might become unmanageable since even in terms of the Pali literature it would likely include information way beyond little ole "sukha."
If you disagree, I'd appreciate it if you would first discuss your thoughts here.  Thanks,
Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 17:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, FWIW, I just sectioned off the aforementioned material under the header "Pali literature."  Hope the above satisfactorially explains why.  With metta, Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Options for article expansion beyond the Pali literature
Talk:Cervino, Campania

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose  The correct move under the naming convention for Italy is Cervino, Campania.  The consensus in the discussions leading up to the adoption of the Placename, Region format as the primary disambiguator specifically ruled out Placename, Italy as an option.  Skinsmoke (talk) 05:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Template talk:JhanaFactors

message: As a non-expert in the subject, I'd like to suggest changing the wikilinks from Dhyāna to Jhāna. – Fuzzy – 12:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Fuzzy, you are correct; back when this template was created, Jhāna was a redirect to Dhyāna but, evidently, no longer.  Thanks for the suggestion.  I'll act on it shortly.  Best, 24.136.253.60 (talk) 23:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I apologize for the cryptic "Edit Summary" I associated with the change -- meant to write something like: "Per User:Fuzzy's suggestion on this template's talk page, changed jhāna to just jhāna" -- but my fat fingers hit a return key before I finished.  Sorry!  And thanks again :-) - 24.136.253.60 (talk) 23:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiLinks 

message: The table is incomplete; sampasadhana and upekkha are missing. But the syntax of the table is so complex; I'm not able to alter it further. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete
Talk:Vicara

message: Vichara was merged to this article; the terms are synonymous. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to move the Hindu-elements back to :Vichara, and merge the Buddhist elements into :Vitarka-vicara. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Vichara]] merged to [[Vicara]]
Talk:Def Leppard band members

message: *To whoever keeps removing my edits to the Def Leppard band members section, please stop. I'm simply adding dates to specify as to which members were in the band at what time. - Heavymetalis4ever 23:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs a verifiable reference. 156.34.219.247 00:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:RS for information about what a reliable source is. You website is just a fansite and fansites are very poor sources of information and should never be used. Fansites do not show their own verifiable sources of information and are not authorised by the artists themselves. No fansite should ever be linked to Wikipedia... see WP:EL. 156.34.214.115 01:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Def Leppard band members
Talk:Vīrya

message: There are many Wikipedia pages that say that a particular term is a "buddhist term" when in fact it is a common term used in all Indian religions. This should be corrected as wrong information is being served to the uninformed reader.—Nimit (talk) 11:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A common term 

message: The etymology of the term is definitely of interest, but it's completely absent in the section labeled Etymology, which is actually just Meaning or Semantics. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 14:56, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is no etymology in the Etymology section
Talk:James Dahlman

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Bodhisattvacaryāvatāra

message: Hi Truthbody, please do not keep advertising one specific version of the text. It is already in the list at the bottom of the page, amid all the other versions.rudy (talk) 23:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ho Rudy01 I've tried to make the list of translations and commentaries available in English more comprehensive. There must still be a few I've missed. Chris Fynn (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)