lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:ZE Records

message: "ZE Records became the hippest record label in the world..."
surely, the author of this has got to be joking? they were NEVER hip and certainly not the hippest label in the world. even if ZE were remotely "hip" they would have been WAY behind Stiff, Rough Trade, Beggars Banquet, Factory, Zoo, Bomp, Mute, etc.
New talk replying to the above: That's not what it says. It says, "ZE Records became one of the more hip labels of its time." Although I personally agree with this sentiment, this is opinion which I was under the impression shouldn't be used on Wikipedia. You should also sign your posts here on talk pages. Tjb81 17:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Maldives National Defence Force

message: Some of the neutrality issues I found in this article:
* "inmates were injured with gunshot wounds at the hands of the MNDF"
* "In recent times, the MNDF has been used as a tool by Gayoom to spread fear and intimidation and to crack down on democratic activists who are critical of his rule."
:What do you think? Xumm1du 08:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, obviously this should neutralised. --Oblivious 12:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Neutrality

message: Is there a source for this if does not follow the normal British/Commonwealth pattern Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rank Structure

message: Should this article tell us anything about what ships and planes and numbers of troups they have etc?
IceDragon64 (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardware/equipment? 

message: Neutrality issues with this article were raised long ago, and many of these problems remain 8 years after they were first mentioned. I think these problems are particularly relevant in the Special Forces section. "The lethal special forces unit of the MNDF as they are highly trained and ready for any challenge facing the nation. They are armed with the most advanced and state of the art  weapons and gear, and will not hesitate to use them when the situation demands it." sounds like it's from a brochure glorifying the great Special Forces, not an encyclopedia entry.
-- MASQUERAID
Hello Sir I am From Pakistan and I Want to Join Maldives Army.. +923057272404
 MasoodAliMakky (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV in section on Special Forces  

message: Please use english spelling without mixing it with dhivehi language (thaana)
Saafy/Addu City Mncc bros (talk) 11:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc.

message: I find the article somewhat confusing: it says that this Federal case was effectively overturned by the decision in Stratton, which was a NY state court decision. IANAL but I didn't think it was possible for a lower court to overturn the opinion of a higher one. Or is this article implying that since the reasoning in Cubby was based on state law it became defunct when Stratton was decided, since that case effectively made the existing state law moot? Can someone with more legal knowledge clarify this and perhaps make the article clearer? -- Hux 08:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page is being revised over the next month as part of the
Cyberlaw WikiProject. Rlough (talk) 23:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Future Edits on the Way
Talk:Long John

message: Is there a distinction between an éclair and a "bar-shaped doughnut, which may or may not be filled"?
Further, is it accurate to say that a long john may not be filled?  I've never heard of such.  Of course, that hardly makes a case that it isn't... --Suttkus 08:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  —Nnadigoodluck███ 08:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Long john →  – "Long John" redirects to the Long john disambiguation page where all the entries use the uppercase "J". — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 November 2020
Talk:Intervention theory

message: The following passage in the current lead is dry, dry, dry: 
Within the theory of nursing, intervention theory is included within a larger scope of practice theories.
Burns and Grove point out that it directs the implementation of a specific nursing intervention and provides theoretical explanations of how and why the intervention is effective in addressing a particular patient care problem.
These theories are tested through programs of research to validate the effectiveness of the intervention in addressing the problem.
This is so dry, the chalk is crying. — MaxEnt 01:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hand me the lip balm  

message: — Assignment last updated by Dkhora (talk) 19:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ANTH 193 - Behavioral Science in Practice
Talk:Matt Glaser

message: I made an infobox and added two references, having had to remove the one attempt there, as it was a dead link, but still, his faculty page at Berklee doesn't list his birthdate or place of birth. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 22:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate? Place of Birth?

message: Two closely related websites (his employer) and an interview (not a reliable source) to not provide anything in the way of notability. Since he doesn't have the coverage for the general notability guideline, in what way does he meet WP:ACADEMIC? --Bejnar (talk) 08:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Ignatius Peverall

message: If someone searches these names, all they get is a family tree template.  These people are minor characters, and that's why I made it a disambig page. I'd prefer a redirect, but the people are relavent to two different pages/families. John Reaves 09:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion - hangon

message: The character who created the Hallow is Ignatus Peverell, not Prewett.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.231.182 (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The information is completely false
Talk:Lucretia Black

message: She is found on both pages, a redirect would be more appropriate but you can't redirect to two different pages. John Reaves 09:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: you just did, nevermind. -- THLCCD
If someone searches these names, all they get is a family tree template.  These people are minor characters, and that's why I made it a disambig page. I'd prefer a redirect, but the people are relavent to two different pages/families. John Reaves 09:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Western railway line, Sydney

message: the western lline does not stop a central. north sydney is the change over. and north to hornsby. map needs a change.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.28.232 (talk • contribs) 
:That is completely wrong. The Western Line and North Shore Line are separate entities and change over at Central, where one becomes the other. Do a search for Milsons Point on a CityRail site and it will not show the station as being on the Western Line. The map does not need a change (perhaps besides indicating that services continue onto the North Shore line). Please sign your posts too, by writing four tildes "~~~~" at the end of what you write. JROBBO 00:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

message: After being accused of being a vandal, I thought I'd raise this here. I think that the large station table on this and other Cityrail pages is too big and directory like for an encyclopaedia page. Would anyone read it? It seems a rehash of information that could easily be found on the official Cityrail website. Thoughts (with civility please)? Endarrt 01:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stations table

message: I've changed the date for Parramatta station. The original Parramatta Junction station opened in 1855, however this station is not the Parramatta station. It was in Granville, close to the current Granville station, which was rebuilt in 1860 near by and retained the Parramatta Junction name. Parramatta Junction (granville) remains as an important junction between the line to Campbelltown (and southwards), and the line to Penrith (and westwards). So you might argue an 1855 date for Granville, but not for Parramatta. 60.240.207.146 (talk) 03:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Parramatta Station construction date

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Northern railway line, Sydney which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:List of Singapore LRT stations

message: Hi, any reasons why the abbreviations are removed? As I used to live in the area, I can therefore verify that the BPLRT stations are coded as such on the old GTM. It is not vandalism.
Punggol and Sengkang LRT loops stations don't have as such and is displayed as "PE/PW/SE/SW" followed by the station number.
And if anyone wants parity with the MRT stations, the future column can be removed. OfficialCQJoker (talk) 04:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbreviations for LRTs are very much valid. 

message: The nearest LRT station to 662C Edgedale Plains is  Kadaloor on the Punggol LRT line. JaylonRoblox2009 (talk) 05:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nearest LRT to 662C Edgedale Plains (my house)
Talk:Federal Music Project

message: Dates for this project are needed.  Badagnani 09:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates needed

message: Nothing is cited inline and code tags are appearing in the Reflist area. This should be cleaned up and refs placed with the sections to which they refer. Ebonyskye (talk) 00:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs need proper format. 

message: It'd be insightful to describe the ripple effect of terminating the Federal Music Project/  WPA Music Program for musicians following the Great Depression Ashtronaut101 (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Develop "Decline and Termination" Section
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Gnangarra

message: User:Gnangarra
Category talk:	5
Category:	12
Image talk:	16
Image:	32
Mainspace	1779
Portal talk:	2
Talk:	1105
Template talk:	59
Template:	14
User talk:	716
User:	316
Wikipedia talk:	248
Wikipedia:	733
avg edits per article	4.16
earliest	13:24, 27 September 2005
number of unique articles	1211
total	5037
Gnangarra's editcount summary stats as of 09:27, November 19th 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 09:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Zoysia matrella

message: some suggestions, normal size, how far a single plant spreads, flowering(seed). is it classed as a weed anywhere Gnangarra 09:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good questions, weediness in general is mentioned, "it can become weedy, like many plant species with desirable horticultural characteristics," and it is a PIER species of concern for weediness in some areas.  With plants known for "spreading vigorously by stolons, or occasionally by rhizomes, once established," how far a single plant spreads is a function of time, nutrient availability and space availability.  I'm not overly interested in ornamental grasses, so I'll leave the flowering up to someone else, as this is just an article to include the most basic information about the plant.  I encourage you to look this information up and add it, as this is a very common horticularal plant, and the flowering is well-studied.  KP Botany 17:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. The page needs some dimensions of the plant (how many cm tall? leaves how many mm wide?, etc - I'll try to find time to look up some info). Also, as the species is an Australian/southeast Asian native, it should use Australian English or Commonwealth English spellings as per the MOS guidelines on national varieties of English. - MPF 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My English is already poorly enough adulterated with spatterings of 19th century Empire English from my research work that I generally fail at keeping a consistent dialect throughout, much less using a dialect other than my own. If someone wants to change it, that's fine, but I can't realistically do it and the technical part of the article.  The article is about a rather important little tropical lawn grass, it turns out.  I'm just running through the list of missing plant articles and adding ones I can write up using scientific research and the books I already have, and that have a lot of hits on the Internet, but no information on Wikipedia.  Please feel free to add information about size and the like, as this information is available, but I'm not comfortable with any of the sources, and my grass phylogeny text doesn't have the details.   Thanks for the feedback.  KP Botany 00:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Neighbourhoods in Latvia

message: This category definition is too broad. Every neighbourhood belongs to some city and should be categorized there.
This category contains only one article about neighbourhood in Riga, there are few another articles about neighbourhoods of Riga, and these are categorized there (which anyway makes most of articles in that category). -Yyy 09:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a category Neighbourhoods in Riga, and am putting all the articles about Riga neighbourhoods there. I am making Neighbourhoods in Latvia a parent category to categories of local city neighbourhoods in Latvia.--Artpol 19:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Elizabeth Street, Hobart

message: All things mentioned could have sections written about them.  We should also link to  and a map - google maps, perhaps?  I would, but have written this much just as procrastination ;).  -mjec 09:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:UFO: Aftermath

message: edited for a bit more neutrality --89.12.211.147 09:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fares and ticketing on the Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)

message: Someone please update the fares with the latest information as at 8 October 2011.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lao zha bor (talk • contribs) 08:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update fares. 
Talk:Zeno map

message: "The evidence against the authenticity of the map is based largely on the appearance of many non-existent islands in the North Atlantic and off the coast of Iceland. One of these islands was Frisland." --- This is hardly evidence against the authenticity of the map. Maps from the 14th through 16th centuries commonly depicted non-existent islands to the west of Europe, including Frisland. Certainly the Zeno is a forgery but this is not the evidence against it. That evidence is outlined in Lucas's book. (added by 24.113.181.22, 09:44, 19 November 2006‎)
Added details of IP as it was not originally done. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: interesting details and a new interpretation here:  Venetian Navigators. The Voyage of the Zen Brothers to the Far North. Faber & Co., London, 2011. . 
some details were unknown to other coeval maps, and some toponyms are coherent with a voyage in the year 1390.--147.162.48.1 (talk) 15:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  not totally an hoax
Talk:Yio Chu Kang MRT station

message: This whole section reads like an urban legend and it doesn't cite any sources to prove it's validity. If there is truth in the claims made here, then it is not unreasonable to assume that some reputable articles do exist on the subject.
Why are my  being deleted? I quote this page: "To ensure that all Wikipedia content is verifiable, anyone may question an uncited claim by inserting a  or  tag." ... "If someone tagged your contributions with "Citation needed" and you disagree, discuss the matter on the article's discussion page." 116.88.219.190 (talk) 12:35, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the entire section. The edit was made originally by IP 203.124.2.17, which around the same time also made other edits, including claiming that MacPherson MRT Station on the Circle Line (sic) was to have side platforms (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Braddell_MRT_Station&diff=prev&oldid=80405446). Given that I have not been able to uncover any such records of a discussion with Disney in the past in the archives's online search facility, and neither have others been able to add references, I decided to remove the section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyfjj (talk • contribs) 13:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lentor MRT Station 
Talk:Australian contract law

message: I'm re-rating this article, because it clearly covers at least the basics VeryRusty (talk) 12:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Arturo O'Farrill

message: This article is, weirdly, about both father AND son (confusing both named the same). I will do my best to distinguish. Sevenstones (talk) 14:25, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Orchard MRT station

message: Why got image of botanic gardens?! Arvin2323 (talk) 04:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the 

message: I'd be interested to know if any of the six artworks mentioned in this reference remain, and if so - more information should be added to the article (similar to other NSL stations with artwork commissioned by MRTC). - https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19871205-1.2.34.6 Turini2 (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artwork
Talk:Dhoby Ghaut MRT station

message: I was going to comment at this article's FAC last week, but the nomination was closed before I could comment. For the art section, there is a good argument that it shouldn't overly rely on descriptions given by the designers. Here is a list of things I noticed, briefly. Most of these are based on content instead of wording.
*  - I have a feeling this may be somewhat vague. Is this diversity in a specific way - racial, ethnic, tribal - or did they just want to represent "regional culture and artistic heritage" in general?
*  - To me, "pay homage" may also be vague. If it's a specific honour, say "...honours Chinese ceramics". If it's merely inspired by Chinese ceramics, say that instead.
*  - Sometimes, wording is unnecessarily clunky. Here, you may say "hand-crafted by the artists" ("themselves" is not needed unless you're explicitly saying other artwork is mechanically crafted or is handed over to a contractor).
*  - Similarly, you can just say the artwork has a common theme. 
*  - "Strategically positioned" reads like public relations talk to me. If these are positioned in specific locations (based on their setting), you should say that instead.
*  - Again, you can say "to blend with"/"to complement"/etc. "Well" is subjective and, though it may have been the artist's intent, in practice this may not be the case.
These are my initial comments, looking at the Art section briefly. In general, I would make sure that sentences aren't worded in a way that might be considered subjective or opinionated. I may take a further look later. Epicgenius (talk) 16:22, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , I don't see anything out of place on a second glance, but I may have to look later to see if there's anything missing coverage-wise. So far though it seems like a pretty well-rounded article. Epicgenius (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments for improvement
Talk:Marina Bay MRT station

message: If most trains now terminate at Marina South Pier, why is the title of the article still saying that most trains terminate at Marina Bay? Someone please help to update the article's title. JaventheAldericky (talk) 16:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Train service pattern to [[Marina South Pier MRT Station|Marina South Pier]] 

message: Is it necessary for the CCL and TEL portions of the history to be titled as 'Interchange'? I don't see the need for it. R22-3877 (talk) 09:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Tbh, I didn't label those headers. I mainly took care of the content.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headers 
Talk:Tanah Merah MRT station

message: The shuttle service to the Airport has cross-platform interchange, in both? directions.
This can be achieved with three platforms, the middle platform being double sideD?
Is there a track layout to show this?
Tabletop (talk) 06:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track layout? 
Talk:Dover MRT station

message: It's quite impressive that you can read into the second paragraph before receiving a hint as to where this station is! :) 138.37.199.206 08:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: don't quite get what you mean.. Chensiyuan 08:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, ok. Given proper intro in first line of first paragraph. —Sengkang 02:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where? :) 

message: I'm questioning the claim that this was "the first elevated station with two side platforms on either side of the tracks, as opposed to having a island platform in all other elevated stations."  I'm sure there must be hundreds of earlier such stations across the world.  79.74.17.34 (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sentence has been edited to remove Singapore-centric viewpoint. 리지강.wa.au talk 16:26, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First ever elevated station with side platforms? 
Talk:Farrer Park MRT station

message: Does the Farrer Park MRT Station really have 14 exits as seen on it's page? I have stepped into this MRT station about 3-4 times already (in December 2006) but I was only able to see 4-6 exits. Does it really have 14 exits or was I not keen/observant enough? Acs4b 15:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  14 exits 

message: One link at Exits shows an Exit to City Square Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia LOL!!! ;-)), half way around the globe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_Square_Mall  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.143.182 (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wronk hyper-link at City Square Mall Exit 
Talk:Woodleigh MRT station

message: I don't really see the need to document service faults and other hiccups, unless particularly noteworthy in terms of damage caused, or casualties. Rindo (talk) 09:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we really need "2012 incidents"? 
Talk:Sengkang MRT/LRT station

message: A 19 year old man or 19 year old woman?? We already know the person is a teenager by the age.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clementi1965 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 19 year old teen????
Talk:Punggol MRT/LRT station

message: The infobox here showing the previous and next stations misspelled the word "anticlockwise". Jose Corregidor (talk) 15:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed the error in a template page. Thank you for notifying. Seloloving (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox error