lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Reverse echo

message: Nothing really to say about this.  I just think it's funny and mildly cool that there's an article about this.  Carry on. 24.117.15.248 13:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it sort of surprised me too. But really, why not?--AmitTheSomthing 15:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

text: So i took it out.  Cheers, Lindsay 08:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually, no. Reverse echo is not the same as a piece of reversed music with echo already on it. The backwards guitar solo is simply that: backwards. Reverse echo is applied to forward/normally heard music. Binksternet (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nothing to say

message: This article badly needs a sound sample of analog reverse echo. It needs more explanation comparing digital reverse echo to gated reverb as the two overlap considerably. If the digital reverse echo section is worth keeping, then the article needs a sound sample of digital reverse echo as well. There needs to be more discussion of the history and development, and of reactions from the public. Binksternet (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To Do list

message: As I listened to the Rolling Stones' album Let it Bleed and got to the track "You Got the Silver," I realized that either it's my own ears, or the electric slide guitar employs a subtle reverse echo effect. The album was released in 1969, and the song recorded in January of that year, so this could be an instance of the effect that predates "Whole Lotta Love" for a while (maybe not "Ten Little Indians," now that I review the page, but still). I just wanted to verify this - I've only heard the song on a 1980s-era CD, and it's quite possible the CD contains a newer mix than the 1969 LP, though I doubt they did serious remixing for that. Just wanted to verify.--24.90.254.182 (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  You Got The Silver? 

message: The terms "echo" and "reverb" are often conflated, despite the fact that they are separate phenomena: an echo is a distinct repetition of an entire sound (one or more times), whereas reverb is an extended decay added to a sound, creating a "tail" beyond its natural ending. The links in the article associated with each of these words do make this distinction clear, but the rest of the original article ignored this distinction. 
Therefore, the name of this article should be changed to "Reverse reverb". I have already edited the article to reflect this distinction.
Danamcc (talk) 20:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  misuse of the term "echo"
Talk:Goodbye, Columbus

message: I don't understand the connection between the last section ("The Conversion of the Jews") and the theme of this article. 
Admittedly, I did not read the book. But shouldn't the article be written for people who haven't read the book (too)?
--Philopedia 12:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "The Conversion of the Jews" is one of the several short stories in this book (which is an anthology of short stories and one novella titled "Goodbye, Columbus").  --GHcool 19:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused over connection 

message: Can anyone come up with a source for that poem? --Sammermpc 05:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  source on The Conversion of the Jews 

message: I added a "note" on the statue of Columbus in the park across from the Newark Library, which upon reflection, was rightly deleted. It contained some factual errors. Nonetheless, I think this is an interesting fact to know about the book, especially considering the academic debate about the title (which you can find in the Norton Anthology to the Short Novel, for example.) To those of us who know Newark, the statue of Columbus is an "in joke" about the book. I thought I'd share it with a wider audience. Perhaps just adding a trivia note would work, but I leave it up to others to decide. Cheers.
--User:Train60 12:08 PM 13 November 2007  —Preceding comment was added at 17:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding trivia item
Talk:Worms: Open Warfare 2

message: Should the weapon descriptions be posted on the wikipedia page?  I think it's too long to be included but I don't mind if it's added --Rex Nebular 17:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weapon descriptions.

message: OK, with a bit of research, I've found out that Team17 developed the PSP version by basing it off the Worms Open Warfare enigne, and Two Tribes did the DS version by basing it off the WWP N-Gage port... so, how would this be implemented into the article? The two engines have their own disadvantages, for example, the PSP version's physics are much worse than the DS'. --anger2headshot 04:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds like it should just be under differences. -Internet Mage (talk) 03:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: WP: No original research. Adding citation needed tags. Brunky (talk) 04:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Different engines

message: Does the article means that the PSP version has more FMV cutscenes? Because the DS version certainly has some (one between each terrain type switch, introducing the new terrain type).Medinoc (talk) 08:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FMV cutscenes

message: On May 20, 2014, Nintendo shut down the servers for all Nintendo DS games. So the Worms: Open Warfare 2 (NDS) community is no longer active. Though I do believe the game can be played using fan-made Wi-Fi servers. Korra II Royal (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Wi-Fi Shutdown
Talk:Karandash

message: Geez, can't a guy just create a page in the process of obtaining more info on the subject, only to see a speedy tag seconds after creation. Karandash was a world famous clown, as can be seen from all the hits on Google (). Notability also comes from his recognition as People's Artist of the Soviet Union. Errabee 13:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose deletion. But some more information would never hurt! --Camptown 13:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded a bit with what I could find. Errabee 19:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested speedy deletion
Talk:Organic law

message: can you help me*
Well, sure. What's needed here is a recap of Thomas Paine, first to say that government was legally incapable of being a party to or author of its organic law, i.e., its constitution. I'll make Wikipedia a deal. If someone else profiles Wolf DeVoon and/or The Freemman's Constitution, I'll write a nice piece about organic law as a concept. God knows the world needs it.
196.40.33.123 00:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is good material on Spain at :es:Ley Orgánica, if someone is in the mood for some translation work. - Jmabel | Talk 17:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spain 

message: :I removed the globalize tag dated December 2010. The reasons are 1)- The tag is unclear concerning intent, 2)- The article does present world views, 3)- There are around 195 independent sovereign states (including Taiwan) and 60 dependent areas. 
:As soon as a tagged article expands to include some world coverage this tag becomes outdated. This is unless someone would like to present that there is some magical number to actually mean complete or near complete globalization deserving the tag. If this is not the case the article should be relegated to future editorial improvements for added world views with the career tag removed. Otr500 (talk) 15:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag removal 

message: Shouldn't there be a section on the organic law of the People's Republic of China? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  China
Talk:Belvoir (theatre company)

message: I think that the Belvoir St Theatre and this article could be covered in one article. It is the source of continual confusion, and both share the same website. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to this, I am wondering whether all of those lists of plays should be split off into a list article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 00:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:FUNDAEC

message: The [fundaec.org | FUNDAEC] page (English version) doesn't reference Bahá'í at all...is this a mislabel? Alan 13:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: I removed the statement: "niece of Farzam Arbab and daughter of current Universal House of Justice member Gustavo Correa." Because the source only mentions Bita Correa as the director, but nothing about her family relationships. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 06:03, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bita Correa
Talk:Havana Bay (novel)

message: I think that the secondary main character Osirio should be mentioned. --99.236.48.201 (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: i don't see how those images merit inclusion in this article. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  images
Talk:Tetrahydrogestrinone

message: Does anyone know for sure which substance The clear refers to? On page 57 of Game of Shadows its said that it refers to norbolethone,  says its THG. --ChainSuck-Jimmy 08:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The clear? 

message: i removed the section listing athletes accused of using thg. who took it, who didn't take it, and who has been accused of taking it have nothing to do with what thg is. more to the point, barry bonds perjury trial has NOTHING to do with the chemical structure and or effects of thg.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.143.189 (talk) 15:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: athletes

message: The Food and Drug Agency (FDA) does not 'ban' things. It evaluates the efficacy of  drugs and makes recommendations. It takes an act of law to make the possession of a thing illegal in the US. Tetrahydrogestrinone was made an illegal substance in the USA by the Anabolic Steroids Control Act of 2004     http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.03866:  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.253.92.99 (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FDA ban? 

message: This statement was made in the article in very grand form. I removed it because it was uncited, but it would be interesting to include if it's actually true and verifiable. Does anyone know of a source? Exercisephys (talk) 23:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More potent than any steroid before it? 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Members

message: Hello, I am looking to write an article on Rockford First Church.  I wanted to know if there would be anyone who would be willing to help get everything in order for what I need on Wikipedia.  I don't want it to sound like an advertisement.  I simply want it to be informational about the church. Also, don't want to get it deleted.  I just need some help.  :)  If anyone is willing that would be great!!! Thank you!!! Amandaallard05 (talk) 19:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rockford First

message: How can you become a member? Alliereborn (talk) 05:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: How to become a member

message: *Timothy Usher
*Jodymckewen
*Jessig
*Brythstone
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nswinton (talk • contribs) 27 April 2007
===How about?=== 
*dmaycovski 13:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Are the following people still around?

message: *dmaycovski 13:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How about?

message: I would like to become a member of Wikiproject Christianity, but was not sure how to join up. Any help with how to sign up to become a member of your Wikiproject will be appreciated. Vorbee (talk) 07:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: How do I become a member of your Wikiproject?

message: I was attempting to become a new member but when I attempt to sign on to the list I'm listed as: "1. J.Abrego" rather than the subsequent number. Am I doing something wrong? I'm simply applying the "#J.Abrego (talk) 13:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome! You added your name after a "/onlyinclude" code. It should be before the code. Now it's fixed. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 14:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Member
Talk:List of schools in Germany

message: This list has an enourmous potential to get really messy. I suggest splitting the Bundesländer into seperate articles and organize by Regierungsbezirke. Free-zombie 13:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also recommend to split this list. We have more than 50000 schools in Germany (including higher education), far too much for one list. TJHC (talk) 09:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I also recommend creating a list of schools for each of the Bundesländer and changing this article into a list of those lists. Most of the individual Bundesland lists would then need to be subdivided further. Coyets (talk) 12:59, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: messy

message: FYI. Ikip (talk) 07:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidelberg Middle School]]
Talk:Ishmael (Moby-Dick)

message: ... of the 1851 novel Moby-Dick by U.S. author Herman Melville.
should be 
... of the 1851 novel Moby-Dick by American author Herman Melville
VogonJeltz (talk) 10:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I switched it back to U.S. because American may refer to other than U.S. Kingturtle (talk) 12:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

message: The proposer no longer favors deletion -- see Talk:Moby-Dick#On the Lead once more. I agree that Ishmael (Moby-Dick) should be improved, but not deleted. ch (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "proposed deletion 

message: The Ishmael page had two banners attached to it, "Unreferenced" and "Original research." These banners are now removed, because unsourced material has been removed and sourced information has replaced it. Should anyone disagree with the removal of the banners, please say so on this Talk page so that further improvements may be carried out instead of having these banners back again. Also read next item on Ishmael's name.MackyBeth (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Development of the page

message: One section that is not yet changed is the section about Ishmael's name. The plan is for Monday 23 December to remove the few unsourced sentences and replace them with Nathalia Wright's insights from her Melville's Use of the Bible, which title already is included in the Sources.MackyBeth (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The allegory to the Biblical Ishmael is now added, with Nathalia Wright as source.MackyBeth (talk) 18:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The Biblical name Ishmael

message: The title of the picture on the right says “Issac” when it should say “Ishmael”. I don’t know how to change it 2600:4040:54DD:1F00:F809:E70A:605D:D5A3 (talk) 00:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of picture  

message: Bran against the west and against the Mera Crow 207.203.41.250 (talk) 23:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bran and the world then Bran’s family and their rule
Talk:Jesse Stone (character)

message: Should the novels and the movies have separate articles? ---Dagme (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the novels and the movies have separate articles? 

message: I think the section on the movies, whether a separate article or not, should discuss the striking and distinctive minimalist style of the dialogue. This style is also somewhat reminiscent of "Mamet speak", the  dialogue style of David Mamet. ---Dagme (talk) 17:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minimalist dialogue style. 

message: Dogs v important to Stone.  Need words about them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluefox79830 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dogs 
Talk:Gogle

message: While most people coming to this page will be looking for Google, some others may be looking for goggles. I changed it to something in between a disambig page and a typo redirect :) Ozkaplan 13:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: وە پارچەکانی 37.17.142.190 (talk) 18:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  دروست بوني ئۆتۆمبیل
Talk:Pensée unique

message: this article treats only the half of what it is. ref the french or spanish article.
This article speaks about the reality of the expresion while the spanish and french especulate about the use against left winged intelectuals without any real base on reality as the scarcity and irrelevance of the quotes show. Sometimes some people had used against left but it is clearly an expresion used mainly against Fukuyama conclusions.--Igor21 16:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is correct, I have heard the expression sometimes used on the right against the welfare state and against the culture that emerged from the sexual revolution. ADM (talk) 04:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete

message: ::The originally posted article assumes the phrase is used only by leftists; but the term is much more general than that, and is now used by people of all kinds in discussing politics and many other subjects of argument. The article needed to indicate this. 
::For example, a recent article on Mediapart on "La pensée unique" says, "Pensée unique, as a means of discourse, is not a thought, and doesn't refer to a specific method or epistemology, much less to a concrete, identifiable philosophy, nor even to a single author....In fact, "pensée unique" serves, very concretely, to stigmatize an adversary in a battle in which the opponent is always dominant in an unequal relationship.... It is a polemical concept." 
::(La pensée unique, comme pratique discursive, n’est pas une pensée, en cela qu’elle ne se réfère pas à une méthode spécifique, ni à une épistémologie particulière, et encore moins à une philosophie concrètement identifiable, ni même à un auteur singulier...En fait, la pensée unique sert très concrètement à stigmatiser un adversaire dans une bataille où l’autre est toujours dominant dans une relation inégalitaire, et n’a aucune fonction heuristique. Elle est un concept à usage polémique... [et son] caractéristique est que le sujet soutenant ou déplorant l’usage de cette pensée, et celui soutenant ou déplorant cette théorie, se placent systématiquement en situation de minorité.)
::I found the article as originally posted did not have a neutral point of view, so I have tried to make it more neutral. Also edited its slightly foreign English for better flow. --Evangeline (talk) 15:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Update on meaning

message: "The expression was coined by Ignacio Ramonet, editor-in-chief of Le Monde diplomatique,[2] in an editorial in January 1995."
Certainly not! It is well known in France, and has been abundantly demonstrated on the French Wikipedia page, that Jean-François Kahn "coined the expression" "pensée unique", not Ignacio Ramonet! 
Have a look here: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pens%C3%A9e_unique
--ThalèsWasHere (talk) 11:37, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ORIGIN OF THE PHRASE
Talk:Borodino, New York

message: While reviewing the Onondaga County template I saw that the page for Borodino redirected to the page for the town, which seemed wrong to me.  I have just replaced this with a stub as I don't have the time to research or add any more information at this time. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 14:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Redirect 
Talk:List of Little House on the Prairie characters

message: A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage for the Little House on the Prairie character Albert Quinn Ingalls. As such, Albert Quinn Ingalls should be merged here. Neelix (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Favor - Certainly sounds reasonable to me. --Musdan77 (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Albert Quinn Ingalls]] 

message: First off, this article has very little information on this character. In fact nothing other than "Adopted Son". That says nothing about this character. Second, the previous discussion is a poor excuse of a consensus. An entire articles fate should not rely on just a few editors who just happen to be watching the article at a particular time. And of course it ignore the fact that the PROD tag was removed by another editor, meaning the merge was not uncontested. Third, in universe information in a television show is considered a source, as long as no outside syntheses is added.--JOJ Hutton 15:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Albert Quinn Ingalls 

message: I find the family trees under section Characters based on real people confusing.  Are we to believe that the TV series had hundreds of characters, some of them based on people born as far back as 1530? I don't think so.  
If these family trees are of real ancestors of Laura Ingalls Wilder, then perhaps they should be moved to that article (although it would seem incredibly unusual for a biography to have so much genealogical detail).  If they are fantasy genealogy, then what purpose do they serve by being listed here? Mathglot (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing family trees
Talk:Little House on the Prairie (miniseries)

message: The article's title should probably match the first line.  In other words, I prefer "little house on the prairie" and then include the full title as "also known as" - or vice versa.  But both should be in the first sentence.--Lucas559 (talk) 02:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://api.ithenticate.com/en_us/dv/6277?lang=en_us&o=19318487. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Lucas559 (talk) 02:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Live from Golgotha: The Gospel According to Gore Vidal

message: "the voluminous Christ"?  Should this be "voluble"? Deipnosophista (talk) 17:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  error? 

message: Hi all
It seems that this book does not have the title given here
All the catalogues, using the ISBN number given in the article, show the title as simply "Live from Golgotha"
Indeed I cannot find any catalogue that uses a longer title
Perhaps it needs moving? Chaosdruid (talk) 00:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Loose Change (book)

message: Since the book is not considered a novel, shouldn't the title of the article about it be changed? Kdammers (talk) 11:10, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong title? 

message: In the 13th episode of Saturday Night Live's third season, John Belushi mocks NBC's scheduling blunder during Art Garfunkel's monologue segment, providing a degree of immortality the miniseries would likely never have if it had been aired correctly. Asat (talk) 04:24, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBC is not God, Art.
Talk:VR Transpoint

message: VR Transpoint is the new name for all VR's logistics companies. See http://www.vrgroup.fi/fi/vakiolinkit/VR-konsernitiedottaa/news_20101101094632.html (in Finnish) for more info. --Yaamboo (talk) 11:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger or whatever?