lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zdob și Zdub

message: I won't change the language name used simply because they're Moldovans. Obviously, it depends more on what they call it. "Hardcore Moldovenesc" seems to imply to me that it would be in "Moldovan" rather than "Romanian".
In addition, the presence of Moldovanisms such as "papusoi" (instead of the more Wallachian "porumb" or other words from various graiuri such as "cucuruca") seems a convincing argument to me. However, if they are fervently against "Moldovan" as a language or a name for a language, it should remain as it is. --Node 23:52, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language name 

message: I've restored two members who were deleted without comment by an anon IP. Both are mentioned on the band's own site:
*Sviatoslav Starus -  
*Igor Buzurniuc - 
- Jmabel | Talk 06:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members 

message: The band history seems to have a massive history of gigs, I'd be tempted to strip it down a lot and only mention the most notable shows but I don't know enough about the band or the music scene in that region to say what is notable. Furbybrain (talk) 13:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band history far too detailed 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Xed/Proposed decision

message: You might want to check what's on the latter page. That's not the user name Jimbo uses. --Michael Snow 23:37, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What's your point? - XED.talk 11:07, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: Oh I see - XED.talk 12:31, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jimmy Wales]] vs. [[User:Jimmy Wales]] 

message: I have added the following to my "evidence" although perhaps it belongs here:
As far as I can tell, I am being accused for having made personal attacks on four occasions.
* 19:08, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Where have I said that you saying "Actually, I'd say you just made the point for him" was a personal attack? - XED.talk 19:54, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubenstein's response 

message: Concerning the accusation that I have persisted in attacks, there is one thing that Xed and members of the ArbCom do not seem to understand.  When I mention my having called Xed a moron -- meaning, that he has a cognitive deficit  it was in the context of explaining why I had said it and expressing my regret that I had said it while admitting that I had made a personal attack in the past.  This was not intended to be a "new" personal attack, just an admission of an old one.  If there is anything in my wording that suggests otherwise, I regret it and would change it.  As to the other element (concerning a personality disorder), I do not consider this an attack and did not want it to be interpreted as an attack -- but if that is how the ArbCom understands it, so be it. Slrubenstein   |  Talk  21:39, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved from Arbitrator's notice board 

message: Will there be findings about the personal attacks against JayJG, Ed Poor, Viriditas, and JDW that SLRubenstein submitted on behalf of another user? Snowspinner 22:04, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
:Ha, I read that as St.Rubenstein at first. I thought the Pope was getting senile. As for your question - I don't know, but perhaps there will be action against people who start arbitrations against people because they don't like the name of a project - XED.talk 22:26, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: More Findings
Talk:Rosey Grier

message: I merged this article as requested with Roosevelt Grier under the more common name Rosey Grier. More info needs to be added about his days as a player at Penn State by the way. --Jtalledo 20:20, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: How famous is this song, and the fact that he sang it? I think it should be mentioned, but, then again, I remember how big the album "Free to Be You and Me" was when it came out.FlaviaR 05:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "It's All Right to Cry"

message: It is rumored that Rosey and Pam Grier are cousins, but her memoir Foxy: My Life in Three Acts (p. 83) states that they are not. Cherdt (talk) 20:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pam Grier

message: My memory is very hazy on this, but didn't he appear in the music video for "(Nothing Serious) Just Buggin’" by Whistle? RadioKAOS  –  Talk to me, Billy  20:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting credits
Talk:Woolworth's

message: There's also a Barbados Woolworths, which was sold off by the UK arm 20 years ago and will continue to trade. ([http://www.cbc.bb/index.pl/article?id=2708969 CBC article here) This ought to be mentioned in the dab page. 86.132.138.159 (talk) 03:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbados 

message: Some pictures of Mr Woolworth ould be appropriate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.96.227.88 (talk) 10:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FW Woolworth
Talk:List of former UPN affiliates

message: The page is looking great, 65.103.216.79! Keep up the hard work! :) --Firsfron 20:57, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unless I missed something, Belo doesn't own WUPL in New Orleans. CBS still owns that station and I changed the ownership status of the station.
A deal was reached last year, but that's now in limbo, at last check. Anyone has any new info on the pending sale? - --Bdj95 16:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WUPL's owner 

message: Very soon, WRBJ (UPN 34)--Jackson's new, full-power UPN affiliate, owned by St. Louis-based Roberts Broadcasting Company--will finally begin broadcasting.  (But, for now, WRBJ can only be had by Time Warner Cable.)
209.215.61.9 08:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jackson's new U: WRBJ (UPN 34) 

message: On Helpdesk-l, Bobby Berry wrote: "The station you have listed as the UPN affiliate in Columbus Tupelo is not WKDH it is WCBI –TV Channel 35-2( ECBI)".
Can you please check to see if he is correct, and if so correct the article accordingly? --maru  (talk) contribs 02:22, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: Please remember that many UPN stations owned by FOX have shut down as a result of the switch to "The CW Network," including the West Coast flagship, KCOP. 70.187.145.80 03:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The CW Network 

message: Should we indicate on the table whether each station will affiliate with the CW, My Network TV, or neither in September? Morgan Wick 15:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-CW status 

message: Number 159 in the market list should be Palm Springs, CALIFORNIA, not Palm Springs, Florida.
4.232.186.240 04:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market List Error
Talk:List of television stations in the United States by call sign (initial letter K)

message: This page is looking much better. Thanks 65.103.216.79.
--Firsfron 21:00, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: Is that still how the "K" stations are allocated? As being west of the Mississippi River? CaribDigita (talk) 20:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does K._._._ still mean to the "West of the Mississippi River?"
Talk:Rhys Chatham

message: copyvio?
--Cpomeara 21:24, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yes — I was made suspicious by HTML markup in the text.  The source is here.  If you're the author of the material on that site, then you need to confirm that, otherwise I'll have to remove the text and put a copyvio notice on it. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:37, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confimation of copyright violation 

message: It says he is a "multi-instrumentalist (flutes in C, alto and bass, keyboard)..." Alto what? Bass what? I suggest "...alto flute, and bass flute..." to avoid ambiguity. Or perhaps the author means "alto sax, bass guitar"? It's hard to say. ThreeRocks (talk) 18:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro paragraph
Talk:Processor

message: What is a front-end processor?— Preceding unsigned comment added by  198.150.183.44 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 21 February 2005
:processor is main part of computer  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.199.95 (talk) 06:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See Front end processor, we have an article on that. - Wbm1058 (talk) 16:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Front-end processor 

message: Why does it say "TIP Marines may refer to:"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.201.242.130 (talk) 17:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A. Because User:Tipmarines vandalized the article. – Wbm1058 (talk) 16:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Q. 

message: This may be a candidate for a WP:DABCONCEPT, discuss: Widefox; talk 14:33, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And what would it cover exactly? A processor is simply too ambiguous to be beneficial in itself. What most people consider a processor is actually a Microprocessor which is already a pretty good article. --CyberXReftalk 04:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

text: +1 for what User:CyberXRef says.  Look at all the different flavors of "processors" listed; what does a central processing unit have in common with a word processor (much less a food processor), other than that a word processor, back when word processors were dedicated computer systems rather than applications, probably had one or more CPUs in it. Guy Harris (talk) 07:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

text: Central processing unit is the primary topic for . This is the "broad concept" article related to computers/computing. "Central processing unit" is a legacy term from when the "brains" of computers were the size of small rooms, and were separate from the "memory and storage unit" and the "input/output unit", which were also large boxes filled with hardware. The "units" were connected to each other with communication cables. In the early 1970s, the term microprocessor was coined to distinguish Intel's new semiconductor-based CPUs from IBM's mainframe-sized CPUs. Now, in the era of smartphones all the "units" fit in the palm of your hand. If you want to make  the primary topic for processor and move this to processor (disambiguation), I suggest submitting a WP:Requested move. Thanks, Wbm1058 (talk) 17:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

text: So now, nearly four years after this discussion was started, as this disambiguation has not stabilized over time, I have come around to the idea that a broad-concept article is indeed needed. Such an article was actually started on 11 June 2016 at Processor (computing). We can debate whether that parenthetical disambiguation is best, or a natural disambiguation such as computer processor or processing unit is better, but that is the article where THIS belongs, since the dab-purists won't let it stay on this disambiguation page. – wbm1058 (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Broad concept
Talk:Iraqi insurgency (2003–2011)/Archive discussion of move

message: moved there from WP:RM ObsidianOrder 22:02, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: Results: Could any admin please take care of this?  This has been up for discussion for 5 days, and another couple of days on the article's talk page.  The votes are Support: 19, Weak Support: 2, Strongly Oppose: 1, Oppose 8, Weak Oppose: 1.  I think there's sufficient consensus for this move.  The destination is now a redirect to History of Iraqi insurgency but it used to have some content so the history may need to be merged.  Alternately, just swap the source and destination.  Thanks.  ObsidianOrder 07:50, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No there was only one change. I'm not happy with this vote, I see it as systemic bias, but there's little that can be done about that. There was also no adequate response to the fact that it conflicts with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (identity)—Christiaan 19:22, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Iraqi resistance]] &rarr; [[Iraqi insurgency]]
Talk:The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald

message: I went to a lot of effort to establish these - their identities are almost as crucial to the Lightfoot sound as those of the players themselves. However, someone decided to delete all but one of them, claiming to me on their chat page [sic]: "it's not S.O.P. for personnel sections, I removed the brand names and my rationale is article consistency".
In case a supervening editor sees fit to overrule this deletion, here are the brand-name credits again, in full:
* Gordon Lightfoot – Gibson 12-string acoustic guitar, vocals
* Terry Clements – Gretsch electric guitar
* Pee Wee Charles – MSA pedal steel guitar
* Rick Haynes – Kramer bass
* Gene Martynec – Moog synthesizer
Birdman euston (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted this edit, no other musical article (if there is, I haven't seen it) list brand names for guitars, bass etc. Hammond organs and Moog keyboards are normally linked as proper nouns.   - FlightTime (open channel) 00:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In a quick search for 'Gretsch guitar', for example, I found three musical articles in which it was included in the "Personnel" section. Imo, any systematic attempt by Wikipedia editors to remove the make, let alone model, of musical instrument used in a recording is woefully misguided, for the reason I gave in my original complaint above. Birdman euston (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical-instrument brand names ("Personnel" section)
Talk:Khilafat Movement

message: This page as it stands contains gross over-simplification and, the case can be made, distortions. Needs attention.—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 23:28, Feb 22, 2005 (UTC)
I am adding just the attention tag to the main page. Will wait for feedback on the POV issue before tagging the main page with that.—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 23:40, Feb 22, 2005 (UTC)
Wow..This is definitely an exaggeration to call this a fundamentalist movement when even the term fundamentalist wasn't coined ..The Father of Secular India Mahatma Gandhi, a devoted Hindu gave his full support to this religious movement as a symbol aspirations of of United India. 86.181.16.28 (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention, NPOV, etc.

message: The anon editor persists in trying to turn this article into a diatribe against Muslims. I am having a hard time keeping my temper with this sort of thing. I regard the Hindutva demagoguery re Muslims as morally equivalent to Nazi diatribes about Jews, or Hutu radio calls to exterminate Tutsis. Innocent people are DYING because of idealogues like the anon editor. Wikipedia shouldn't be the carrier of this plague. Zora 08:22, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide any source saying that they did not support them? 2407:D000:A:57B2:F4BA:B07E:668E:7562 (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anon editor still making inflammatory edits 

message: The lead is a very close paraphrasing copy paste of the Britannica article on this: https://www.britannica.com/event/Khilafat-movement. Needs to be rewritten to avoid copyvio issues. Gotitbro (talk) 19:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: The Khilafat movement or the Caliphate movement, also known as the Indian Muslim movement (1919–24), was a pan-Islamist political protest campaign launched by Muslims of British India led by Shaukat Ali, Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar[1], Hakim Ajmal Khan,[2][3] and Abul Kalam Azad[4] to restore the caliph of the Ottoman Caliphate, who was considered the leader of the Muslims, as an effective political authority. It was a protest against the sanctions placed on the caliph and the Ottoman Empire after the First World War by the Treaty of Sèvres.
The movement collapsed by late 1922 when Turkey gained a more favorable diplomatic position and moved towards Nationalism. By 1924, Turkey had simply abolished the role of caliph.[5] 103.141.158.26 (talk) 19:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urdu 

message: The khilafat movement is known as the Indian Muslim movement (1919-1924) was a pan-Islamist political protest campaign launched by Muslim of British India led by Shaukat Ali,Maulana Md. Ali Jauhar, Hakim Ajmal khan and Abdul kalam Azad. 2409:4054:216:F185:E94D:109F:96FF:76D (talk) 05:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khilafat movement.
Talk:Synthetic memory

message: There might be a more recognized or formal name for this phenomenon than "synthetic memory" that might be dug out of textbooks by a more studious person than myself.  I needed a term, that is understandable and at least heard of in some circles for the context of rapidly generated "junk" memory that is a plague upon speed readers, so I created this article.  The term false memory is not what I was looking for.  Any ideas?  Metaphorman 01:07, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: At its current state, this page just seems to be a less-detailed duplicate of false memory.  I'm not sure what term you were looking for, but it doesn't seem to be found yet.  Perhaps we could merge this article into false memory anyway, to avoid reader confusion? GinaDana 04:43, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Following up on your suggestion to merge, this article is now tagged for merge to False memory WVhybrid 21:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Twentieth Air Force

message: "Twentieth Air Force was formed during World War II, exclusively as a heavy strategic bombardment organization." Was this only a U.S. air force, or was it a coalition? Kingturtle 01:56, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Exclusively USAAF. Arnold deliberately numbered the air force beyond the sequence 1-15 to demonstrate that it was a global strategic air force not subordinate to any theater command, and also commanded it himself for the same reason. He pledged to support theater commander requests (i.e. MacArthur or Nimitz) for support when necessary, but 20AF reported directly to the Joint Chiefs.--Reedmalloy (talk) 22:02, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added the unreferenced template to a couple of sections in this article and have also added one in the Notes section. For such a large detailed article it needs inline citations.  I note in the reference section it says "This article incorporates text from 20th Air Force Website, a public domain work of the United States Government." Please see the articles Western Allied invasion of Germany and the Operation Matterhorn to see how the text that comes from a  public domain work of the United States Government can be cited. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 12:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding the unreferenced template

message: What is the likelihood that someone giving a testimony would state that they were stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base assigned to the 20th Air Division in March 1967, in the capacity of senior launch control officer, is telling the truth? Had they said the Twentieth Air Force everything would be fine, but from the outside it would seem hard to explain how such a person would mix up these two structures. __meco (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No accounting for human memory, since neither organization was at Malmstrom in 1967. Bwmoll3 (talk) 20:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion with the 20th Air Division 
Talk:Anna Held

message: How could Florenz Ziegfeld be Held's common-law husband if she was married to another man, Maximo Carrera, from 1894 to 1908? Ziegfeld met Held in 1896 and left her in 1909. Even by the standards of common-law marriage, the partners must be qualified to marry, which Held was not. — Walloon (talk) 16:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common-law husband 

message: Big Mistake!
In the article you can read: "Held spent the years of World War I working in vaudeville..." "After the war ended, she returned to America and starred in the film Madame le Presidente (1916)". "Shortly afterwards her health began to fail. She collapsed onstage in 1918 and died after a few months from multiple myeloma at age 45 (August 12, 1918)".
World War I was from 1914 to 1918 (November 11). Held returned to America and died BEFORE the war ended! Big mistake. Wikipedia is wrong again, ahahhahahahahah!
:Your comment wasn't removed because you're right (couldn't care less if you are or aren't), it was removed because a). it's rude (the what I assume is suppose to be laughter at the end is unwarranted and insulting) and b). unsigned. Rude and unsigned comments can be removed from talk pages. Talk pages are not here for idle chatter or trolling. They're here to discuss issues about the article. Further, Wikipedia itself can't be wrong. Wikipedia isn't a person who is capable of such a thing. Wikipedia editors can be wrong which can easily be remedied by anyone who stumbles across a mistake. If you're so inclined, fix the article. If not, move on. Pinkadelica♣ 23:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh my gosh!  There was a mistake in the article.  I don't think there's ever been a mistake on Wikipedia before, so it's a huge relief that you spotted this one.  Instead of the rude comment, whoever you are, you could have just fixed it.   It took me about 3 seconds to fix it, and I think that was much less time than it took you to write your comment here twice.  That's the thing about Wikipedia, anyone can edit it, so if you see something wrong, you can deal with it in a number of ways.   You chose the most unproductive of the options available to you, but if it makes you feel good, go for it.  Kudos on your strong grasp of world history, and thank you for sharing your knowledge with those of lesser intellect. Rossrs (talk) 01:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Europa Universalis

message: I don't really think this is a good place for a handful of incomplete strategies for EU1, so I've cut them and placed them here.
--Volrath50 02:48, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is not about the Europa Unversalis series, it's about the video game, so it should contain information only about the video game. --MrStalker talk 12:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: agree, also this game is notably different in which it is played on the entire world map. while early versions have only part of the globe (europe as the playing field) Akinkhoo 13:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 