lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Service capability interaction manager

message: Is this article contributed by Michael Palmeter or did someone copy from his blog? The content is identical:
Solskinn 11:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. This really needs to be marked copyvio ASAP. -AdamRoach (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

text: I think the copying went the other way in this instance. The identical text was contributed to Wikipedia on June 12, 2007. The whitepaper has a publication date of October 2008. -AdamRoach (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Richard Monette

message: This word was removed from the opening sentence by 69.221.227.171 with the remark "a bit povish". The word "unprecedented" means "without precedent"; in other words, "nobody has done this before." Here is the list of artistic directors up to Monette:
# Tyrone Guthrie (1953-1955) [2 yrs]
# Michael Langham (1956-1967) [11 yrs]
# Jean Gascon (1968-1974) [8 yrs]
# Robin Phillips (1975-1980) [5 yrs]
# John Hirsch (1981-1985) [4 yrs]
# John Neville (1985-1989) [4 yrs]
# David William (1990-1993) [3 yrs]
# Richard Monette (1994-2007) [14 yrs]
Since Monette was the first to serve 14 years, his tenure was unprecedented. The word is not PoV at all, it is factual.
Guinness323 (talk) 14:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of word "unprecedented"
Talk:Open Platform Communications

message: I don't find the article to be very clear. After reading, I am still not sure what OPC does. Some examples and pictures/diagrams would be useful  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.125.71.178 (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity of the article 

message: Hasn't the official meaning of OPC changed to Open Process
Collaboration?
That is what Nathan Pocock claimed in the software developer
radio show ".NET Rocks" on 2008-08-07 (it is also stated on
the associated web page - see the last link below),
  10 m 40 s  -  11 m 50 s:
  MP3 (42 MB):
    <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/netRocksFullMp3Downloads/~5/329570652/dotnetrocks_0357_nathan_pocock.mp3>
      (Short: <http://shrinkster.com/1170>.)
  Home page for the OPC episode:
    <http://www.dotnetrocks.com/default.aspx?showNum=357>
Mortense (talk) 00:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OPC now Open Process Collaboration? 

message: Does anybody know an OPC based SCADA software which can work on both Windows and Linux?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.182.77 (talk) 10:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  OPC based SCADA 

message: The references to opcfoundation.org don't seem to exist anymore. These need some updating  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.254.148.67 (talk) 09:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  URL/References out of date 

message: Well I guess the name of the article is completely wrong. The Source given for the reason of the name "Open Platform Communications" shows a text, where this name is not mentioned once . So it is completely incorrect. The OPC Foundation still doesn't have full name for OPC. It seems to be just three letters with a historical meaning and that's it. --Neto-Zeme (talk)
--- Edit ---
For now they changed it in the source to the name mentioned here. So now this is finally correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neto-Zeme (talk • contribs) 10:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does OPC stand for?
Talk:Indie cred

message: Can we please just slate this for deletion?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doompooky (talk • contribs) 23:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Pete Yorn is not indie-credible; he has alternative cred but not indie cred, if that makes sense. For one thing, he's on Columbia (not an indie label). For another, see this article: 
http://www.treblezine.com/reviews/1589.html
(which seems to represent general indie-rock-scene feelings about Yorn). Phair's album had no indie credibility, which is why it got reviews like this one in Pitchfork Media. 24.223.151.194 (talk) 10:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pete Yorn?
Talk:Abdominal (rapper)

message: Not a criteria for deletion as has some notablility as toured the UK a number of times with DJ Format and solo. Also worked with and has on his album contributions from established artists such as Cut Chemist / DJ Format.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Ginge (talk • contribs) 16:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:The Next Great American Band

message: Would this be for the top 10 or the top 40 (or whatever number)? Cause if it's for the top 40, some of the bands are in this video here:
Videos / Exclusive Access / The Next Great American Band - Promo Video FufuTofu 21:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Participating Bands 

message: Great job on the listing of songs performed!  Does anyone have thoughts about where to put each week's theme?  You know, "songs by Bob Dylan", "songs by Elton John and Bernie Taupin", and "songs by Billy Joel"?  You do agree that it would be good to have, don't you?  --luckymustard 18:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weekly Themes 

message: Couldn't we combine this table into the performance table we have already because the only new information it brings is the "Place" column, otherwise all of that information is already in the previous table. - zachinthebox (User • Talk) 21:22, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I combined it with the performance table to make the "episodes""Top 12" table. It didn't really add any new information by itself, so I just added a column to the performance table for the rankings and now the article is smaller. - zachinthebox (User • Talk) 02:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elimination Table 

message: when will we can to see a new season of next american band  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.85.76 (talk) 05:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  when
Talk:Bootstrap aggregating

message: A couple of things look wrong with the figure (though it's still okay enough to give the general idea of bagging)
1) Far less than 100 smoothers are plotted
2) The red curve does not appear to be an average of the grey curves
3) There are no units for the axes (e.g. Celsius/Fahrenheit)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.142.185.12 (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figure 

message: Should this page and Bootstrapping_(machine_learning) possibly by combined together?  It seems that they cover very similar content, albeit the other article is fairly short.
Xekno (talk) 04:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, it describes the same technique. Let's replace that article with a redirect. It doesn't look to me that we need to combine anything. The only new fact mentioned there is "The error is then estimated by err = 0.632×err_test + 0.368×err_training." It's not clear where that formula comes from. References don't look useful to me: 1) Efron's paper is about bootstrapping in statistics, not bagging, 2) there's nothing about bagging in Viola and Jones paper, 3) external link is dead. -- X7q (talk) 11:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Please explain this:  "If n'=n, then for large n the set Di expected to have 63.2% of the unique examples of D, the rest being duplicates."  How is the mysterious 63.2% derived?  If n' (the size of each Di equals n (the size of the original training dataset), then Di contains 100% of the training data set!  Also, instead of the word "examples" could we use some standard language such as cases or observations?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.231.152.119 (talk) 06:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No,if Di is drawn from D with replacement (with n=size(D)), then there is 1/n^2 probability of duplicate, 1/n^3 of triplicates (is that a word?), etc. This is actually independent of size of ni. If you have ni>>n then you should have Di have all elements from D, however, for ni<=n, it would be incredibly unlikely for Di to have all elements from D. Also, examples IS standard language when you talk about learning; bagging is, if anything, a learning algorithm. --IlyaV (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Sampling is done with replacement. What's the problem with n'=n? Burritok (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

text: Sorry, there is no issue. --Zumerjud (talk) 14:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  63.2% 

message: Is it worth listing a list of implementations? AndrewHZ (talk) 18:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implementations 

message: "It is well known" by who? You've made assumptions about both the reader and the general population. I'd say the dependent clause, "It is well known that" can be dropped altogether and the sentence can begin with, "The risk of a 1..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.197.105.161 (talk) 21:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I took out the offending phrase and added a ref verifying the assertion. --Mark viking (talk) 23:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording issue
Talk:Radford College

message: Seeing as there is only one "Radford College", would it not be better to move the page (as was done recently, but reverted) to simply "Radford College" without the "Australian Capital Territory" qualification? cf. Dickson College, Merici College. It would make it neater and would not mislead people to thinking that there are other Radford College's. I have also edited the page so as to make it neater (and with the higher quality logo) and to remove some misleading information, eg. the many supposed "Key People" replaced with simply the Headmaster, the link to the Anglican Church website removed as it is simply an Anglican school, not actually operated or owned by the Anglican Church (cf. other Anglican schools, eg. Canberra Grammar School), and (not to be pedantic) the school colors did not include Sky Blue. The expect tag is at the head of this article and I am very much an expert on the school and its structure and history, so I hope to be able to contribute and turn this into a much larger and more informative article in the future. 58.106.147.126 05:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The page move had to be reverted as it was not done correctly (see WP:MV). I just did a google search and found that 'Radford College' is not unique, there is a University in the US that is also called 'Radford College' and im sure there are others, therefore as per Naming Conventions it should stay as is. The article can still be easily found, especially with a redirect from Radford College. I also reverted the change to infobox as these days the general rule is that Template:Infobox Aust school is used for Aust public schools, and Template:Infobox Aust school private used for Aust private schools. Loopla 08:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to simply "Radford College" 

message: hi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.179.51.203 (talk) 08:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi
Talk:Carlos Camacho (actor)

message: El amor es más fuerte
Pablo Serrano 2600:1700:82C0:3810:F08E:2FE3:D0A7:85FC (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telenovela
Talk:The X-Family

message: Since they didn't appear in the show or in anyway impacted the story, there shouldn't be a separate section created exclusively for them. Their info does not belong in The X-Family. You may briefly mention them in the Bio of Xia Yu and Xia Mei.--WaterOB (talk) 02:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lei Ke Shi & Sha Jie
Talk:Intrepid-class ship of the line

message: Note that the Magnanime, Sampson and Diadem, which were previously shown as an allegedly separate Magnanime class, were actually units of this class, built to the same design. There was no separate Magnanime design; see correct class list of fifteen vessels recorded in David Lyon's Sailing Navy List and other books (including my own). This fact has been checked with Brian Lavery, whose otherwise admirable The Ship of the Line contains this error.  Rif Winfield 12:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Luke Sullivan

message: Two of the quotes are given multiple references. This seems strange. Only ONE ref is needed for a quotation. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Category talk:Counseling

message: :Suggest merging :Category:Counselling to :Category:Counseling
:Nominator's rationale: The US spelling of "Counseling" is the most common. We can still use the UK spelling of Counselling for the articles that are specific to those regions. --Action potential  t c 13:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree--Ziji  (talk email) 23:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:1971 European Cup Winners' Cup final

message: Hello! Is it possible to add a file which contains the starting line-ups for both teams in the final?.
--88.91.100.244 (talk) 15:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting line-ups
Talk:Caro and Cuervo Institute

message: Do they have a site in English
Do they have a site in English, for ones making a effort to learn Spanish.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.211.144 (talk) 02:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid they don't. Their main focus is on those who already speak the language, in any case most of their services are offline, the website only serves as a reference of their publications and activities within Colombia. mijotoba (talk) 23:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alphabet book

message: Gee, from the redirect going from "primer(textbook)" to here, someone who isn't familiar with the terms might actually think that all primers are the same as Alphabet books (they're not).  That's logically  tantamount to someone typing in "fruit" and being redirected to "apple".  There's also primers for mathematics, geography, geology, indeed, almost any subject.  I'm becoming disillusioned at this kind of extreme austerity and minimalism at Wikipedia; this is a perfect example of how absurd it can be. Shanoman (talk) 06:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't moan .... fix it! This article is only as good as YOU can make it Victuallers (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: An Alphabet app is a sort of Alphabet book, but with interactive features. So this is the question: could be  Primer be a digital? P.karnaukhov (talk) 14:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Primers are Alphabet books? 

message: Concept of economic developmen 2405:ACC0:1103:7B4E:B174:658B:94E7:D88A (talk) 13:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic Development
Talk:Thousand Islands Parkway

message: After a brief check of Google Maps, it seems Google has added Highway 2 markers to its maps website along the Thousand Islands Parkway. I am well aware of the Parkway's former routing as Highway 2S prior to 1970, but I did not think it was still designated as Highway 2. I thought Highway 2 was only between Highway 401 and Gananoque's eastern town limits. Does anybody have any information on this that they could share? Thank you. BigBenzino (talk) 22:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right about it being from Gananoque to the 401... and prior to 1998 it ran much further inland. I'd be wary of Google Maps, which can often pop up with the strangest of mistakes. I personally stick with the MTO's increasingly outdated AADT counts or Official Road Map. - Floydian τ ¢ 19:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highway 2 Again?
Talk:Rocketdyne J-2

message: http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2008/nov/HQ_08-290_J2XCDR.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.208.127 (talk) 11:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  J-2X passes Critical Design Review 

message: The article doesn't give the date of development of the original J-2 design.AmateurEditor (talk) 20:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the J-2 developed? 

message: Why was beryllium removed from the J-2X and why was it in earlier versions to begin with? Axeman (talk) 00:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question that should be answered in the article. I can only speculate. Beryllium has low density, high melting point, high thermal conductivity, and high strength. All good reasons for using it in a rocket engine. It's also expensive and possibly carcinogenic, which are possible reasons for removing it. --71.214.210.201 (talk) 02:51, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of beryllium in J-2X 
Template talk:Atheism sidebar

message: I just reverted the removal of much of the "related concepts" section of the template, but I recognize that shortening that part is a legitimate issue to consider, so, let's discuss it. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related concepts 

message: Is there a way to stop this template from pushing down other templates like what the box does to the  templates in Russell's teapot? Sizeofint (talk) 19:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop from pushing down other templates 

message: There is some discussion at Talk:Atheism#Image_for_atheism concerning the appropriateness of the Atheist Alliance International symbol in this template. I would like to suggest that it be removed, since atheism, as a concept, is much broader than anything represented by any particular alliance, and, indeed, as an IP editor has noted, atheistic belief is sometimes actually "not organized". Do people support removing the Atheist Alliance International symbol from this template? (Pinging: ) Isambard Kingdom (talk) 17:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said there when I saw the IP's request and your response, yes, I support its removal. Doug Weller talk 17:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

text: Agreed.  Why do we need a symbol?  AAI may want a corporate logo which is relevant to their pages but atheism per se does not need logos, creeds or organisations.  Religious bodies may require logos to ensure their adherents only accept the approved doctrine but since atheism has no mystic doctrines and bodies to promulgate them, we don't! Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

text: Agree - Since atheism doesn't (and couldn't) have an official symbol or logo, neither should its associated Wikipedia templates. Xenophrenic (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

text: I support the removal of the Atheist Alliance International symbol from this sidebar. To me, it is the equivalent of using the Golden Arches as a symbol to represent all fast food. -- Scjessey (talk) 11:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  On possibly removing the Atheist Alliance International symbol 

message: Would it be appropriate to bring it back? See  old revision. It was fitting, I think. Since Atheism is of Greek etymology and that image had an early mention of it. But in any case it would be interesting to have a discussion on it - I mean the Theism infobox lacks an image as well, as its a broad subject. Same could be said of Atheism, since its simply a lack of belief in metaphysical things and isn't a uniform system either. But images always look cool, so I think its worth discussing. 24.44.73.34 (talk) 16:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old icon
Talk:Shado Vao

message: Anyone seriously interested in improving the article should consider adding some real world related info, e.g. regarding the concept, creation, and/or function of the character within the Star Wars narrative etc. Please consult our writing about fiction guideline, which also includes a list of exemplary articles.
There are currently three featured articles on Star Wars characters: Palpatine, Padmé Amidala, and Jabba the Hutt. What sets them aside from most of the other SW character articles is the effort to write from the real world perspective. Pay particular attention to paragraphs like Jabba the Hutt#Concept and creation, Palpatine#Concept and creation, and Padmé Amidala#Characterization.
Also take a look at Darth Vader, which despite its lack of reliable, published third-party secondary sources features interesting sections on e.g. #Character creation and concepts and Darth Vader as a #Cultural figure.
Even though reliable sources may be tough to come up with, any effort to introduce coherently written real world aspects will be greatly appreciated, because it contributes to the depth of the article and accurate coverage of the topic, and thereby makes for an improved reading experience and increases the encyclopedic value of the article.
—AldeBaer 13:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-universe
Talk:Francisco Duque III

message: He became Cabinet Secretary in October 11, 2004 and appointed as secretary of Health on June 1, 2005, having been confirmed by the Senate Commission on Appointments on June 11, 2008. abs-cbnnews.com, CA confirms Gonzalez, Puno and others--Florentino floro (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confirmed

message: This is a poorly written attack piece bordering on slander and sould be deleted immediately.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.68.106.146 (talk) 11:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, so I went ahead and rewrote it to fit Wikipedia's style guidelines. I don't even like the guy but the amount of thinly-veiled attacks on the previous version was just embarrassing to look at. - PritongKandule Talk. 07:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly non-neutral
Talk:Eric Gores

message: It says on the film's page (http://www.kidandi.com/) that Eric suffers from cerebral palsy.  I have removed the line about him being "mentally challenged" and replaced it with that.  I've tried to reference the page, and failed dismally  Rojomoke (talk) 13:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Condition
Talk:MidwayUSA

message: This article is of advertising characteristics  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.204.234 (talk) 16:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The best way to provide generic information is to edit those respective articles, not to promote your company.  Please see my comments on your talk page. - CobaltBlueTony 14:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Altair 2

message: *Redirected to Proposed Constellation missions. Shimgray | talk | 11:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

message: Altair 2 or Altair 3? The two entries are virtually copies of each other. Can an authority sort this out?90.202.55.89 (talk) 21:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Who will land first?

message: Isn't there a mistake? Apollo 10 never landed on the moon, it made a close aproach of the lunar surface, but never landed. Also, the text says that Altair 2 will land and stay there for 7 days. Could someone sort this out, because there is obviously a contradiction here. Perhaps it was meant to say "Apollo 11"?--Jerem © 2002-2006 (talk) 16:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Like Apollo 10?