lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alexandra of Yugoslavia

message: I wonder if this name is incorrect. If I recall correctly, article titles of the form "X of Y" are reserved for ruling monarchs, none of which these women were? Although I vaguely recall that the policy is to drop the "Princess" for the consorts of ruling monarchs, but list them under their pre-marital name, in which case the second Princess Alexandra of Greece does get this name. Noel (talk) 13:28, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have checked Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Other royals, #4, and this page is indeed now at the right name (since she has passed on). So I have moved the discussion about the Alexandras to Talk:Princess Alexandra of Greece. Noel (talk) 02:49, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Female name reuse

message: The current line of succession to the Greek throne includes females, so I guess that Greece allowed females to inherit the throne during Alexandra's lifetime. Would she became Queen regnant of Greece at the moment of her birth had she not been declared illegtimate? Surtsicna (talk) 16:18, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if succession of her father was questionable, she would have succeded her uncle, George I (the same way Queen Victoria succeded her uncle, William IV). But I guess that Greeks did not want a woman on throne... Surtsicna (talk) 09:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexandra, Queen regnant of Greece? 

message: In view of recent moves of e.g. Marie of Romania I suggest that this person should now be moved to "Alexandra of Yugoslavia".  See WP:NCROY, there is no presumption in favour of queens reverting to their maiden name. PatGallacher (talk) 17:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the most common name? Surtsicna (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The one serious obituary online calls her "Queen Alexandra of Yugoslavia".  Google searches are not much use, since "Alexandra of Greece" and "Alexandra of Greece and Denmark" pick up other people with the same name. PatGallacher (talk) 10:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Has she been crowned? Or maybe has she been on the throne of Yugoslavia for at least 1 minute? She's been the spouse of the last king, but no more the queen, too late.
:Excuse me? Surtsicna (talk) 18:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  But why "The Queen of Yugoslavia" ?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Addingtouch.com

message: I am the owner of Addingtouch.com and author of the related article.  As I'm sure that those who vote on it's deletion are far more knowledgeable regarding Wikipedia I only ask that you consider the following and know that my intentions were not to advertise but to create a first article that would be of little importance and of guaranteed accuracy.  The search term and name space Addingtouch.com will only ever be related to the website and would probably not become a nuisance or get in the way of other searches.  The article presents only facts and does not support the site or business in any way.
As I said, I'm not the expert and not at liberty to say when something should be deleted but at what point is a business considered important enough to have an article and not deemed advertising? 
:Done. — Minshullj 14:56, 30 July 2005 (EDT)
*While Wikipedia:Importance is not policy, it may offer some insight into the general consensus regarding what qualifies a business as notable.  It would also help tremendously if the author of the article were not affiliated with the subject, since it would demonstrate external interest in the topic.  --Alan Au 07:44, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dungeon Keeper

message: This game has a few easter eggs, including hidden levels. One 'egg' activated on 21 mar, at start of the game it saying: "Happy Birthday Jonty barnes" Axet (talk) 13:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: All of which is WP:GAMECRUFT I'm afraid. Adam9007 (talk) 18:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  easter eggs 

message: The game has since been released on Steam. 166.205.190.76 (talk) 07:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam
Talk:Anami Narayan Roy

message: Roy has been in service for 33 years, and has been transferred 21 times, once when his wife was about to deliver, and next when she was a week old.
She was a week old? Who was a week old? His wife? I think we need some grammar change here. I think I'll go make it.
--getkashyap 16:12, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification
Talk:Departments of Guatemala

message: I propose to change the names from say Totonicapán Department to Totonicapán department, SqueakBox 16:18, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
Please wait there is currently a naming conventions in progress Wikipedia:Naming conventions (subnational entities). There is also a list of current use at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Subnational entities/Naming
Tobias Conradi (Talk) 16:21, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: Does Guatemala has Indian reservations like this: Lands inhabited by indigenous peoples--Kaiyr (talk) 16:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian reservations 
Talk:Victor Weisz

message: I tagged this for cleanup and importance, but I'm in doubt as to whether or not it is wikipedia-worthy in this condition.  Sophrosune (talk) 16:43, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can assure you that 'Vicky' was a very well known political cartoonist. Charles Matthews 22:46, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prepayment for service

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The nomination was withdrawn and there were no further votes. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 16:54, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: I think this is a more accurate subset of the stuff on the prepaid mobile page. Dublinblue (Simon in Dublin) (talk) 16:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with prepaid mobile?
Talk:Kamuzu Academy

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 16:55, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:The House of Yes

message: I began to edit the plot for this movie, but haven't finished yet. Since it's one of my favorite films, I am too picky about the details and need to take a break!  But I found some of the details in the plot as written to be either strangely described or incorrect, and wanted to give it the attention it deserves.  If anyone has comments, complaints, or suggestions, or wants to finish editing, I appreciate any input. 
Also, the correct spelling for "Lesly" needs to be verified, as it was spelled three different ways in the previous plot (and nobody likes their name spelled wrong - even fictional characters!)   Dmodlin71 (talk) 09:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: COPYEDIT
Talk:Bath School disaster

message: A recent edit changed all the URLs for the Daggy source from "usurped" to "dead". "Usurped" is the correct designation so I have reverted this change. If you disagree:
:Please see my Support re-direct comment in this talk page's Archive 2 at Talk:Bath School disaster/Archive 2#Proposed merge of Bath Consolidated School into Bath School disaster before reverting this url-status parameter back to 'dead'.
Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 14:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit
Talk:Balthamos

message: Does nobody else see Baruch and Balthamos's relationship as a symbol of homosexuality? Should we mention it? --Taejo 17:03, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: On The Amber Spyglass in the plot summary it states that Balthamos was not male before becoming an angel (and that angels are asexual). This seems strange to me, as I recall that the angels of Phillip Pullman's world were not dead humans but a separate "species" entirely, but we should be consistent. However, as all of the angels were clearly asexual, I have removed the comment about homosexuality. —Cuiviénen,  Tuesday, 21 March 2006 @ 22:28 (UTC)
Deleted text:
 The characters Balthamos and Baruch recieved some controversy
 over the positive portrayal of a homosexual couple in a children's story.
If there is a source for the controversy, it should be noted in the article.  Cuivienen's point should also be noted in order to provide a comprehensive and neutral summary of the facts.  Also, is the article correct in referring to them as lovers?  If they are literally asexual, then that would be impossible. --Icarus 08:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

text: They aren't asexual, the angels are stated as having male and female human forms, and Baruch and Balthamos in particular are both male and are plainly portrayed as a same-sex romantic couple, probably the most feircely passionate lovers in the series in fact.Rglong 06:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RAF Daws Hill

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 17:05, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Europhobia

message: shouldn't this simply be a redir to euroscepticism
:Agree. --Lysy (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the term can refer to either Euroscepticism or anti-Europeanism, and thus I have removed the automatic redirect to Euroscepticism. Eco84 | Talk 17:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: This term should refer to prejudice and racism against ethnic Europeans in the same way that "Judeo-phobia" refers to prejudice against ethnic Jewish individuals.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarquiMarq (talk • contribs) 20:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is not an article but a page linking to related articles. In any case words mean what they mean, not their etymology. Doug Weller talk 05:26, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: And what does "Europhobia" mean? and provide sources please, because what I found was "A dislike of Europe or its culture or inhabitants" (wiktionary), "dislike for or hostility to Europe, Europeans, or the European Union" (dictionary.com). 2406:3100:1018:2:5A:0:1299:3D35 (talk) 09:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate

message: Based on the fact that "Europhobia" is bolded in the lede of Anti-Europeanism, but only mentioned briefly much further down in Hard euroscepticism, it seems likely that the former is the primary topic for this term. If we redirected this there we could add a hatnote to the other article. I'd be interested to know what others think. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[Anti-Europeanism]]?
Talk:Disassortative mating

message: What are MHC class III genes?  From the MHC document I get this: "In humans, the MHC is divided into three regions: Class I, II, and III. The A, B, and C genes belong to MHC class I while the six D genes belong to class II."  However, no explanation about class III.
:In the German article about the major histocompatibility complex, there is a break on MHC-Klasse-III-Komplexe. Maybe, that`s what You`re looking for.--Hans Dunkelberg (talk) 06:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Should disassortative mating not just be called negative assortative mating (see: assortative mating)?--Hans Dunkelberg (talk) 06:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative assortative mating 

message: Due to the emerging peer reviewed literature on examples of disassortative mating in nature, I feel it is necessary to exclude it from the assortative mating page. The emerging topics should be covered in their own page at this point in the research. Feel free to add more material!AnonScience123 (talk) 21:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation of page
Talk:Best of all possible worlds

message: The section, as it had stood, cribbed a summary from Colin Temple’s blog, attributed it to Leibniz, and then explained it very poorly. I have replaced this by a quotation of the actual section of the Monadology that Colin referenced, and more detailed explanations. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major revision of the first section 

message: All of the content of that section was either irrelevant to the "best of all possible worlds" theory, or already stated in my updated first section. It may have been interesting stuff to the Leibniz student, but it did not belong here. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Free will versus determinism"
Talk:Laverda Jota

message: The reason given was "Every page linking here says Jota is a type of music, yet this page is about a motorcycle?". Having a bad name is not a reason to delete. Its a reason to either move or disambiguate, so I've removed the tag. Nabla 17:25, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Speedy Delete tag
Talk:By Way of Deception

message: By the way, the title of this book "By Way of Deception" is a MISTRANSLATION of the Mossad motto, which is the original Hebrew of Bible verse Proverbs 24:6.  Maybe the article should be changed to reflect this... -- User:AnonMoos
:But it is the title of the book, so changing the article title would just be confusing. But you're welcome to write a paragraph for the entry explaining the origin of the phrase and its correct meaning. GagHalfrunt 00:20, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

message: It is disrespectful to fail to mention the number of Marines murdered in the Beirut bombing.  I haven't time to do the research atm, but intend to do so in the next few days. Posting this in case anyone has an objection.Tym Whittier (talk) 19:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not needed. This article is not about the bombing. Meters (talk) 07:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Marine Casualities
Talk:Jenners

message: What does it mean by:
:: "...was the world's oldest department store, having existed on the same site since 1838."
Isn't it still the world's oldest?
:I suppose that the idea is that it's a new shop now, because it's been sold. (I note also that its Web site doesn't claim that it's the world's oldest, only that it's one of the oldest.) --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 18:41, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fathy Arafat

message: There appears to be a duplicate article of Fathi Arafat.  I'm not sure how Dr. Arafat's name is spelled, however Google gives more hits with "Fathi Arafat" (745) compared to "Fathy Arafat" (115).  If anyone can comment on the actual spelling, please do.  -Ichabod 17:35, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

message: As discussed above. I couldn't see anything that needed merging. The Land 22:18, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected to [[Fathi Arafat]]
Talk:Admiral of the fleet (Russia)

message: Admiral of the Fleet (Russia) would make a better translation, see Admiral of the Fleet (USSR). DmitryKo 10:29, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't it be a little inconsistent if Адмирал флота was translated as  Fleet Admiral but Генерал армии would be General of the Army?!! (and I think Army General sounds 
way more awkward...) --DmitryKo 15:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Sally Struthers

message: As stated in the history summary, the Stage section was getting out of hand. It is quite evident that Struthers performs regionally. That doesn't mean every time she plays someplace it's reason for inclusion. I've removed all summer stock and regional theater; leaving only notable inclusions such as Broadway, Tours, etc. Most inclusions for Stage productions are contributed by editors that are not registered accounts. Which means either someone saw her in something and thought it should be added; or there are COIs for certain theaters and playhouses wishing to promote themselves. Unless there is a specific reason to include a particular production, it is merely a resume without merit. Maineartists (talk) 23:33, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage 

message: Was she on it 69.43.23.68 (talk) 03:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sitcom MOM.
Talk:Sundgau

message: This translation is now complete.
Dlyons493 22:13, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Parts of this page need re-writing as the English is not idiomatic - they read as if a non-native speaker wrote them. I made a change but a moderator decided not to accept the change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.133.201.106 (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-writing
Talk:Breakdown voltage

message: Jhakalpit (talk) 06:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure would.  Maybe if you have enough volts you can ionize the quantum flux, or maybe the collective solar winds provide enough atoms to consider outer space a disperse gas rather than a vacuum, but without some generalized idea as to what rough values these constants might take, having a precise formula for calculating such voltages is just useless.  --Polymath69 (talk) 12:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

text: No conflict or contradiction. Is this not just 2 ways of saying the same thing ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:16, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Minimum or maximum

message: It would be nice if someone gave some examples of some breakdown voltages of various materials.
As far as vacuum goes, man-made vacuums have gas present at concentrations orders of magnitude higher than that of deep space, so the term "vacuum" is relative to 1 atmosphere.  I assume ASTM has specs for vacuum pressure, but am not familiar with the specs - call it speculation71.31.148.44 (talk) 17:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Examples would be great. Then we could compare them with the table in dielectric strength. - Rod57 (talk) 10:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples? what exact vacuum ? 

message: Can BV be calculated or estimated from the dielectric strength of a material or is this just an upper bound or what other factors are relevant ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does it relate to dielectric strength
Talk:Distinguished Service Medal (U.S. Army)

message: Is there some reason for the names in the list to be formatted with last name first? —wwoods 18:45, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: To quote a three year old: "It was like that when I found it." -Husnock 23:48, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anyone object to formatting the list to first name first? Einbierbitte 23:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names, inverted 

message: Was this originally second in precedence- behind the Medal of Honor and ahead of the DSC?  a source from 1921   
() mentions it as such. 
If so, when did it switch to the order of today?
Gecko G (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: 1934ish. I cannot find the reg or law. I remember it from working on the Certificate of Merit Medal article when holders traded their medal for an Army DSM in 1919 and then a DSC in 1934. EricSerge (talk) 05:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swapped precedence at some point with the DSC? 
Talk:Hollywood Sign

message: The section seems to be out of place considering that it consists only of one sentence and isn't much related to the article. Without objection, I'll probably remove it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASploopyPerson (talk • contribs) 04:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  About section, "Suicide of Peg Entwistle" 

message: Please put lights on it ❤️ 47.155.1.79 (talk) 04:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hollywood sign 

message: valdimiro da chelton samito 197.218.72.164 (talk) 17:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boa noite 

message: It was Danny Finegood who changed the sign in 1976. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2007-jan-27-me-finegood27-story.html 71.63.175.25 (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. The name "Phil Wiseman" was added by an IP with no other edits in this change a few months ago. I have corrected it. CodeTalker (talk) 18:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's appreciated. Vandalism has a way of slipping through the cracks. Figureofnine (talk • contribs)  23:55, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danny Finegood HOLLYWeeD sign 

message: The redirect H***** S*** has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:H***** S***]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect H**** S*** has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:H**** S***]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect H*** S*** has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:H*** S***]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Martin McGuinness

message: https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/hmso/widgery.htm#appendixa
13 recorded as dead and not 14. Jaymailsays (talk) 15:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's glaringly obvious to anyone with even a basic knowledge of Bloody Sunday that John Johnston wouldn't be classed as being killed in the Widgery report. Kathleen's bike (talk) 15:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources such as the BBC and Guardian give the death toll as 13, this seems to be a widely accepted figure. The discrepancy occurs because John Johnston died four months later. Also, Johnston was not a civil rights protester attending the march as the article says, he was shot accidentally.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims of 14 protesters killed during Bloody Sunday not supported in official report.
Talk:Hilbrand Nawijn

message: The article claims "he and the camera crew were attacked by a local gang". In reality 3 local youths criticized the media and no one was attacked according to the videos. Polygnotus (talk) 22:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "attacked by a local gang"
Talk:Pump It

message: I have a 16minute long version on my computer can anybody tell me whats that all about was it an alum version86.42.99.57 (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longer Version 

message: As with virtually every other Black Eyed Peas article, this one is a frequent target of a prolific sock. Their goal is to remove any reference to the BEP being pop and add that they are R&B. Sources do not matter.
I don't currently see anything calling this "pop", but I'll have a look. I don't see as source for R&B. - SummerPhDv2.0 02:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: Need budget for music video 68.180.110.26 (talk) 04:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget
Talk:2005–2006 Niger food crisis

message: This needs updating; much of it is written in the present tense, and the usual suspects are already predicting another famine.Sartoresartus (talk) 02:57, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:NexGen

message: NexGen was not "short-lived" by ANY measure. The company had been in existence for about a decade before being purchased by AMD. They had built 2-3 generations of chips before that acquisition. Deriders of the company often called it "NeverGen", due to the many years the company not being able to produce a competitive device. Of course, that changed with the Nx586 and later the K6. Dyl 19:18, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
The architecture was used in later AMD chips such as the K6 --- it was K5 !!!
93.214.244.111 (talk) 07:49, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Caulbearer

message: Copyright notice
Permission granted for use of text by the Webmaster of www.caulbearer.org who may be contacted at caulbearer.org@gmail.com Webmaster Notice date: 31st July 2005.
:Written asking for clarification. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:41, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No reply; deleted. --Ngb ?!? 22:55, 11 September 2005 (UTC)