Talk:Charismatic movement

message: Nothing on Wikipeida is so blatantly wrong then citing Pentecostalism as part of the history of the Charismatic movement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.92.229.89 (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article simply notes that (1) there is a historical relationship between the two movements, i.e. the CM resulted from mainline Christians being exposed and adopting beliefs and practices that up until that time had largely been confined to the PM, and (2) today many people use the terms "Pentecostal" and "Charismatic" interchangeably. Basically, Pentecostalism is part of the history of the CM. Pentecostalism is its Father, Mother, and Sibling. Sorry if that offends you, but truth hurts sometimes. Ltwin (talk) 19:13, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Charismatic Movement and charismatic should be contrasted, and distinguished by the use of capitals for the former but not the latter. Pentecostals are  charismatic in that they believe in the gifts of the Spirit, but are not part of the Charismatic Movement," a historical movement beginning in the mainline denominations about 1960... Hyper3 (talk) 19:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the terms Pentecostal and Charismatic are used interchangeably in modern times. Some people don't like the word "Pentecostal" because they don't want to be "confined to a denomination". They instead use "Charismatic" to simply state that they are non-denominational, but that their ministry/movement accepts the gifts of the Holy Spirit in their church services.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.101.232.73 (talk) 00:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentecostals are NOT Charismatic 

message: The article, especially in the lede, gives the impression that "being filled by the Holy Spirit" and spiritual gifts such as speaking in tongues are modern inventions or phenomena. In fact, whilst Charismatic Movement itself is relatively modern, its beliefs and practices are clearly expounded in the Bible. In fact, my understanding is that they largely fell out of favour with the Church in later centuries until the Pentecostal revival and Charismatic Movement resurrected them (pardon the pun!). This somehow needs to be explained in the article, ideally by someone more expert than I. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading modernist emphasis 

message: Opinions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.2.236.197 (talk) 12:44, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No topic "requires a criticism". Editors are only "required" to maintain WP:Neutral point of view and avoid giving WP:Undo weight. If there have been any critical assessments written about the movement in WP:Reliable sources that you are aware of then you are free to put that in the article. Ltwin (talk) 03:56, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that its detractors claim rightly or wrongly that the view that gifts had ceased was almost universal before the charismatic movement, it's very odd to have no reference to them at all. I have inserted a small referenced section in beliefs to reflect this. It may be better subtitled and added elsewhere. Cpsoper (talk) 22:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page requires a criticism of Charismatic movement as well 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Charismatic Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://wels.prometdev.com/news-events/forward-in-christ/october-1996/what-can-we-learn-charismatic-movement?page=0,0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Charismatic Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141111183209/http://www.tateville.com/churches.html to http://www.tateville.com/churches.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://wels.prometdev.com/news-events/forward-in-christ/october-1996/what-can-we-learn-charismatic-movement?page=0%2C0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: One of the early best definition books on the Charismatic Movement is the book, "The Holy Spirit and You," by Dennis & Rita Bennett 1971, by Bridge Publishing Inc. 
It makes the statement, "The 1973 Yearbook of the Encyclopaedia Britannica says: "When in 1960, Father Dennis Bennett announced to his congregation, St. Mark's Episcopal Church in Van Nuys, Calif., that he had experienced a new outpouring of God's Spirit, the recent movement can be said to have begun."4.4.123.189 (talk) 18:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Holy Spirit and You