Talk:Adaptations of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz

message: The 3-disc DVD version of the 1939 film contains a number of silent Oz films, and also a Technicolor cartoon from 1933 by Ted Eshbaugh.  Apparently it wasn't widely released at the time, but it was the first adaptation of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz which depicted Kansas in black-and-white and Oz in color.  It should probably be mentioned on this page, but I'm not sure where it would fit best.  I suppose under "film adaptations" might be best, unless we want to split animated adaptations into their own section. Thoughts? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1933 cartoon

message: :Image:Wizard of Oz Apple screenshot.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wizard of Oz Apple screenshot.png

message: I'm going to comment a couple of pictures out, there are too many for an article this size. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 10:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many pictures... 

message: User:Orion2004 has been trying to insert information about a card game he is producing into this article.  Given the fact that 1) it is not yet released, 2) it has not been reported on by reliable sources, I don't think it should be included.  Its notability certainly seems questionable.  Furthermore, the fact that the producer of the product is the one adding it requires additional scrutiny for obvious neutrality and bias reasons. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it has been reported on by the International Wizard of Oz Fan Club - Will add citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orion2004 (talk • contribs) 05:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

text: I have also noticed that info for the unreleased Nintendo game RIZ-ZOAWD, has not been flagged . Orion2004 (talk) 06:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because it wasn't as obviously inappropriate as your efforts to promote your card game.  I know you saw my comments to you on your talk page, because you've deleted them.  Did you read the policy pages I asked you to look at?  There's a problem when the producer of something adds information about it to Wikipedia, because it smacks of self-promotion.  If your card game turns out to be notable, someone else will add it. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

text: It's been reported by a fan club, not necessarily a reliable source.  Let's get some mainstream citations, then let's talk. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 10:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The game has been announced and a release date given on the game's site. That wasn't good enough? OK, now the Officially recognized Oz fan club is printing about it in their latest published newsletter. Still not good enough. We can keep going around this carousel if you insist. What kind of problem do you have? This really isn't so important.--Orion2004 (talk) 07:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What's important are Wikipedia's policies.  The only reason we're "going around" like this is because you keep refusing to acknowledge that they matter.  You've been asked several times to read them, and your response is to just delete those messages.  That looks like contempt, and you should not be surprised to find people responding poorly to that.  That's why Wikipedia also has standards for how editors interact: because that's essential to making the project work.  At all.  So yeah, this is important. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 12:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read the policies. I have the right to remove messages from MY talk page, if I so choose. It's my opinion that the two of you are taking this too far. I can't see the harm in posting info on an upcoming game that would be of interest to readers of the article. What I mean by "not important" is in the grand scheme of things. Perpetuating a war is in no ones best interest. And personal attacks don't help the matter either, Mr. Quest.Orion2004 (talk) 08:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You've read them?  That surprises me, given how often and how badly you've been violating them.  Give me a summary of Wikipedia policies regarding conflict of interest, verifiability, civility, and consensus, and how your activities somehow comply with them, and then I'll listen to a lecture from you about the Wikipedia policy of your choice. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 01:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

text: There needs to be multiple verifiable second party sources to confirm the notability of the game.  Game site is 1st party, not good enough.  Fan site is a single second party source, not good enough.  Multiple second party sources that are not affiliated with the game production company are needed. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 13:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The citation is not for a fan site but for the printed newsletter by the Oz club, not a "fan site".Orion2004 (talk) 08:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A club would be a fan site. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 15:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

text: How is the Oz Club "officially recognized"?  By whom? Other clubs are official recognized by the production companies of the television series, movie series, comic book series, etc.  Who exactly has recognized the officialness of this club? I haven't found any information that makes this club is any more official than any random website that can be created at will. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 13:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I just found that you're now retaliating by vandalizing an other page I put together. This is a very low level of maturity on your part.Orion2004 (talk) 08:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be, if it were actually vandalism. "Vandalism is any addition, removal,  or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia; vandalism cannot and will not be tolerated. The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, or the insertion of nonsense into articles."  My edit does not constitute any of those and was the simple placement of a tag that shows that the specific information within the article requires citations, not just a list of references at the bottom.  Please make sure you are accusing people accurately before you do. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 10:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orion Card Game 

message: User:Orion2004 insists that supplied reference is valid enough for inclusion of a unreleased card game.  User:Auzemandius and User:JasonAQuest insist that the single reference is not from a viable second-party source. Orion2004 believes that Auzemandius and JasonAQuest's insistence is a personal attack.~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 18:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's worth noting that Orion2004 is the publisher of the game. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 19:08, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Should not be included. Gerardw (talk) 15:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Seems like a clear cut conflict of interest.  If a press release about it's forthcoming production was picked up and published and that reference could be provided, then and only then this might be inclusion worthy.  207.237.33.133 (talk) 10:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Collectible Card Game 

message: (First, I didn't write the article on the special, and I don't really know anything about it more than what the page says, either) I stumbled across this when writing the American films of 1950 article, and the page mentioned that it had been orphaned. It says it's a television adaptation with puppets, so I'm assuming it should be included here?  Thanks! Wool Mintons (talk) 09:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[The Wizard of Oz (1950 TV special)]]

message: The 100th episode (season 5, episode 7) of the TV series Scrubs, titled "My Way Home", should be added. It is an adaptation of or an homage to the Wizard of Oz. See trivia page for this episode on tv.com. -- 84.188.251.155 (talk) 00:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode of "Scrubs" 

message: I don't see any reason why :File:1897 cartoon with William McKinley and little Toto-like dog.jpg is being used as an illustration of this article. I'm not sure what this caricature of US President William McKinley as Old Mother Hubbard has to do with the Wizard of Oz, nor what about Old Mother Hubbard's dog is "Toto-like".  Note this cartoon was published in 1897 -- which is to say, of course, 3 years before Baum's "Wonderful Wizard of Oz" was first published. (Is someone is trying to make a case that Baum was somehow influenced by the Old Mother Hubbard nursery rhyme in creating the character of Toto?  If so, the argument needs to be made clearer, and I don't think this article is the place for it.) In short, could someone please explain what this illustration is doing on this article?  If not, I don't think this illustration belongs here. Infrogmation (talk) 20:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been bold and removed it.  Whether the iconography reminds someone of Oz or not, the cartoon that predates the first published "Oz" work by 3 years certainly couldn't be an "adaptation" of it, so it doesn't belong in this article. Infrogmation (talk) 01:39, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: William McKinley caricature

message: I don't recall beyond book 4 (the wizard and glass) but the series does at times allude to The wizard of oz. I don't know if there is enough notoriety to warrant mention but Todd McFarlane was listed.24.115.19.178 (talk) 09:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephen Kings dark tower 

message: Removed the citation needed tag as a promo can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhjnDVEKdEU  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathcliff (talk • contribs) 01:45, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanksgiving in the Land of Oz

message: User: 66.108.175.67 asks--"The Wizard of Oz" is a 1921 film : I have stills of this movie. ... Can I post them on this page?" the answer is yes. All items published in US before 1923 are public domain--there is no copyright on them, and they can be freely used by Wikipedia. they should be coded as "This work is so old its copyright has expired" or as PD-OLD when you upload them.  Questions like this should be discussed here on the article talk page. Rjensen (talk) 23:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1921 stills 

message: Being familiar with the 1939 film, I notice differences between it and live stage productions of "Wizard of Oz".  Some differences are caused by the difficulty of handling a live animal (the dog used as Toto).  There is an extra scene near the end where Uncle Henry and Professor Marvel are looking for Dorothy (just after Dorothy has clicked her heels together after being told to do so by Glinda, for Dorothy to leave Oz).  This extra scene provides extra time for the actors who played Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Cowardly Lion to get changed back to the farmhand roles.  However, some productions do NOT have those 3 actors changing back to the farmhands, who are thus absent from the final scene in the Kansas home; this allows the 3 Oz friends to appear as such at the curtain call and after the show.  (A case where the farmhands were not in that final scene had Dorothy's lines refer to them in 3rd person when she points out that the 3 farmhands and Professor Marvel were in Oz.)
Where would such information be placed in a wikipedia article instead of just being on this talk page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 19:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  doing "Wizard of Oz" as a stage play 

message: While reading, a noticed this statement:
"The Land of Oz, a sequel to the Wizard of Oz is a virtually unknown 1932 film featuring the Meglin Kiddies."
What does "virtually unknown" mean, someone clear knows of it, so I would not label it as unknown, I have never heard of it. Scarecrow1000 (talk) 21:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need an explanation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080612104931/http://www.columbiaartiststheatricals.com:80/Shows/wizard_oz.html to http://www.columbiaartiststheatricals.com/Shows/wizard_oz.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701001053/http://www.tams-witmark.com/musicals/wizardrsc.html to http://www.tams-witmark.com/musicals/wizardrsc.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/features/wicked--tales-of-the-witches-of-oz-412263.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080506094208/http://www.animeondvd.com:80/reviews2/manga/manga.php?manga_view=4079 to http://www.animeondvd.com/reviews2/manga/manga.php?manga_view=4079
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120313070532/http://www.spawn.com:80/features/monsters2/ to http://www.spawn.com/features/monsters2/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121104102742/http://www.1up.com/previews/riz-zoawd to http://www.1up.com/previews/riz-zoawd
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I recently saw The Wizard of Oz, and realized that the plot is like an episode of Dora the Explorer, only that in the old tale/film it was not a video game but a dream. Throughout the story Dorothy (who at some point she is called 'Dora') find along the way several characters who need help, they join her and finally they all get their reward. It's the same plot as in each and every episode of Dora the Explorer, but modernized.
I don't know if this has been considered before, but I think it is worth digging into. I leave it here for your consideration, if it is generally agreed to be developed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donguijote (talk • contribs) 19:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References of "The Wizard of Oz" in the "Dora the Explorer" series. 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lost in Oz (TV series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 15:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress