Talk:Shakha

message: There was an error in the coding of the table that was causing page editing to be thrown off.  I went through the table and simplified the formatting, which made the structural problem go away.  I did not do anything with the contents of the cells of the table.  In working on this I notice that there is really no citation for any of the facts, perhaps it is all drawn from the one book that was listed (which I have not read).  I have a feeling that this presentation of the data could be simplified by either adding some additional material from some of the references I have at hand, or perhaps replacing it.  I hesitate to remove anything until it can be looked at more closely. Buddhipriya 23:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structural problem with the table is now fixed 

message: In looking at what to do next with this article I notice that in general there is a lack of citations for the details, but on the old original page there was the general reference to Michael Witzel, Tracing the Vedic dialects in Dialectes dans les litteratures Indo-Aryennes ed. Caillat, Paris, 1989, 97–265.  Unfortunately I do not have that publication at hand, and my French is painfully poor.  Does anyone know how that reference got there in the first place?  The article title does not seem specific to the question of tracing the Shakhas, perhaps being more general as a linguistic history.  If this source for the article on Shakhas cannot be confirmed as supporting the current contents of the page, I would suggest that it be removed, on the basis that it may not be of general use to the English reader.  Can any of you please post here book references that you know will be of value specifically in working on the Shakha article?  I will dredge up what I can find, but any solid academic citations to books that are actually obtainable by the average researcher would be of great value. The first step is simply to identify generally-accepted reliable sources. Buddhipriya 04:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call for book references 

message: I re-wrote the Introduction and began to split up the large table into four sub-tables so I can work on each Veda as a separate problem.  I added references for the Introduction and tried to give a flavor of the fact that the shakhas are an important aspect of social identity and class difference among those who care about such things.  Please read it over and correct whatever errors I have introduced. Buddhipriya 05:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction has been re-written 

message: Why is there no mention of enumeration of veda shakhas by patanjali in mahabhashya? 124.123.244.65 (talk) 12:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahabhashya? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shakha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160314084413/http://yabaluri.org/triveni/cdweb/reviewsjul83.htm to http://yabaluri.org/TRIVENI/CDWEB/reviewsjul83.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106205840/http://www.vedamu.org/Media/audio/Atharvaveda.asp to http://www.vedamu.org/Media/audio/Atharvaveda.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified