lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Merseyside Police

message: What was the actual reason for the removal and deletion of the MerPol logo? Some clarification is needed. Narom (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: This section, as it currently stands, is largely lifted from the Police Roll of Honour Trust page for Merseyside, with the addition of PC Neil Doyle, who was killed whilst off duty.  Although each entry is short, this would seem to be within the scope of WP:COPYPASTE.
There are a number of possible definitions, all in use in different places, which result in different lists:
* The most restrictive is that used in the article List of British police officers killed in the line of duty, which includes only "those who were killed as a direct result of a crime or while attempting to prevent, stop or solve a specific criminal act", thereby listing two Merseyside officers (PCs Davenport and Phillips).
* Merseyside Police's own physical memorial plaques, visible through a glass partition from the public area of their HQ reception, include those officers who were killed whilst actually on duty (including accidents), thereby listing seven officers (PCs Davenport, Jones, Byers, Shelton, Shevlin, Shreeve, and Phillips).
* The Police Roll of Honour Trust additionally includes officers killed travelling to/from duty, as well as those injured on duty who died some time afterwards, thereby including five further officers.
* The list in the Merseyside Police article further includes PC Doyle (who was not on duty, albeit it appears probable that he was attacked because he was recognised as a police officer), whilst PC Briggs (who died 18 months after a collision en route to duty) has not been added.
It strikes me that the best thing to do — rather than essentially duplicating the Trust's list (but then tweaking the definition a bit and failing to keep it up to date) — would be to simply replace the list with a link to the Roll of Honour.
Any other opinions?
Quackdave (talk) 20:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Officers killed in the line of duty
Talk:Norfolk Constabulary

message: Just opening this talk page section as the article is currently missing information about the 2022 & 2023 Norfolk and Suffolk police data breaches. I’ve included some links to sources I’ve found about them below (although this will not be a complete list!), however due to time pressures I’ve unfortunately not been able to personally incorporate these into the article - not to mention the fact that they deserve a well-worded addition to the article that I unfortunately am just not able to do myself right now. I’ve also put a similar note on Suffolk Constabulary (if this talk page message seems somewhat copy-pasted from , that’s because it is!).
2022 data breach:    
2023 data breach: 
      
Best, A smart kitten (talk) 06:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data breaches
Talk:Northumbria Police

message: I've re-written the article to include a list of stations and division code (eg. AA etc).
I've got the station list from the Northumbria Police website, which includes some police 'offices' as well as the main stations. 
Please feel free to change if there any alterations needed! BNC85 (talk) 08:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Division Structure

message: There is a mention of a very minor incident where a member of the public called the force reporting anti social behaviour.  The police attended and had a chat with the kids who were building a den.  No one arrested, no use of force, no offences etc.  Is this really worthy of mention as a 'public controversy' on an article of a police force which deals with tens of thousands of far more serious incidents each year.  Even the comments found under the source article are mixed.  I propose deleting this incident as trivial and hardly note worthy in the context of the article subject. Bowchaser (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Public Controversies section

message: [Talk:North_East_England#Recent_IP_edits|This discussion]] is pertinent here, regarding the identity of the IP socks behind the recent edits which prompted page protection. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP socks 

message: I would like to speak to someone please 2A02:C7F:4CE3:4400:C9CC:EAA0:9D45:3BC9 (talk) 12:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you want to talk about? Hopefully you know that talk pages are here so you can discuss the content of the article, not the subject of the article. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make a complaint
Talk:Nottinghamshire Police

message: I see the constabulary's website has been updated. The Brunswick star in their logo now incorporates the new King's cypher and a Tudor-style crown, see: 
https://www.nottinghamshire.police.uk/contentassets/4101fc9af07d4f5ca2ae544c747b8681/notts-full-logo-22.png
Could someone create/upload an SVG version of this graphic and then update the infobox? P M C 09:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constabulary has new logo with Charles III's cypher
Talk:Throw (grappling)

message: That's a very long and unwieldy list there; might be best to scrap it.  At any rate, I've removed tenchinage...the classical version I'm thinking of (see aikido page) does not involve tori going down.  Actually, in typical aikido style, tori doesn't even lean or tilt very much from a straight posture.  --GenkiNeko 16:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenchi Nage 

message: Neither of the images on this page seem to convey the motion of the throw very well; though I recognize it's hard to do so with a still image. Short of having a video or animated GIF file, I think this image may help: :File:MCMAP shoulder throw.JPG. I'd add it myself, but I'd hate to be accused of a conflict of interest. :P bahamut0013wordsdeeds  12:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Some of the techniques in the article redirect back to the article itself (ex: Flying Mare, in the shoulder throw seciton, redirects to "Throw (Grapplin)."  Poinless. 214.3.138.234 (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link nonsense... 

message: Don't ask me why I started investigating this but if you put the original kanji for masutemiwaza into a kanji-english dictionary (or at least the one here: http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/cgi-bin/wwwjdic.cgi) the translation options it gives doesn't include "rear".  It does include a "straight forward" and "head over heels" and I wonder if "rear sacrifice technique" is a persistent mistranslation.  Kano originally translated it as "supine" but while this may make sense as far as the description is concerned I'm not sure how well it translates back to 真.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jongbray (talk • contribs) 18:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ma sutemi-waza translation 

message: Some of the 'translations' to English of these throws make no sense, and I have studied judo.
:"Sin throw (Ippon Seoinage)", sin??
I'd call that a 'single arm shoulder thrower'. Has there been 'subtle' vandalism here?
:"Double-Handed On-the-back throw (Morote Seoinage)". 
Seems to make sense, but I was always told it was shoulder throw. Is somebody making a bit-too-literal translation or, trusting GoogleTranslate?
• See here: "Morote Seoinage (Two Arm Shoulder Throw) Technique" AND also "Two Hand Shoulder Throw"220 of ßorg 01:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: "Sin throw" was edited in ~ 20 months ago, here, I presume accidentally! Most of the other edits seem ok, to me, like this - 220 of ßorg 02:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird English names
Talk:Kew Constabulary

message: I've moved this following the force's change of name. Iridescent 15:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of name 

message: This article states that "The force was set up in 1845 to allow employment of veterans returning from the Crimean War", but that waseight years before the commencement of the so-called Crimean War. This is a nonesense. User:dr5357 19:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed - citation was a dead link Trugster | Talk | Contributions 11:52, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical inaccuracy
Talk:Staffordshire Police

message: I notice the reference to former Chief Constable John Giffard and wonder if it is now topical enough to deserve a mention? Perhaps a table of previous Chief Constables could be collated and presented instead? 86.138.93.41 15:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chief Constable reference 

message: South Staffordshire is only 2-3 miles wide. It would be interesting to know what arrangements there are, between the police forces on neighbouring sides - West Mercia police (Shropshire) and West Midlands police - regarding the pursuit or investigation of cross-border criminals, since it would be easy for a criminal to drive between all three police forces in under five minutes at a leisurely 40mph. Andrew Oakley (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Staffs and arrangements with West Mercia and West Mids police 

message: I notice that the article is starting to read a little bit like a series of bullet points. Anyone fancy rewording it to read more like an encyclopaedia? 195.27.15.83 (talk) 08:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rework? 
Talk:Wandsworth Parks and Events Police

message: There seems to be activity in this article of late that attempts to remove properly sourced material. Further, this removal has the appearance of bias, as the editor in question apparently has a close connection with the material. All editors are reminded to maintain a neutral point of view per WP:NPOV, and not to remove material from a reliable, verifiable source without first gaining consensus to do so. Please also note that removal of citations that reference dead links is NOT considered deletion of properly-sourced material; see WP:LINKROT. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 18:33, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sourced material 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Wiltshire Police

message: Should a short section about the response to the Salisbury and Amesbury poisonings in 2018 be added to the notable operations/some other section?  It strained the resources of the force a fair bit during spring and summer 2018 and was a very unusual challenge for a UK police force to face, however I don't know if it's appropriate for a page such as this?  I don't have the time right now to attempt to put something together, so wanted to just suggest it here? Aurourafx (talk) 02:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There is already a detailed page on the incident here: Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal.  However it is probably worth a mention on the force page.  I would point out that, yes it was beyond the capacity of this particular force, that is why the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command took the lead on the investigation and Wiltshire Police received Mutual Aid from most forces in the UK to assist it with crime scenes etc on the ground. Bowchaser (talk) 09:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add info on Salisbury and Amesbury poisonings?
Talk:York Minster Police

message: :The only other church in the world to have its own police force is St Peter's in Rome (The Swiss Guards).
The Washington National Cathedral has one too.  208.127.133.116 (talk) 17:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Only other"? 

message: The out of context bit that was removed by Mauls appears to have come from .  —Sladen (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: copyvio

message: Information directly from York Minster appears to contradict a number of bits of this article.  The correspondence can be found at .
The correspondence states: "'York Minster Police' is simply the name we use for York Minster’s in-house security team – no part of this organisation is a police force."  Does the article need to be amended? Bowchaser (talk) 13:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition to the sources cited in the article an article in the Daily Telegraph today confirmed that they have some form of policing powers. Given the reports I think it's safe to say they are at least Accredited Persons, and quite possibly fully warranted Police Officers - but yes further investigation on the subject is needed IMHO.
90.197.84.249 (talk) 09:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article misleading re Police status?
Talk:Germinal epithelium (female)

message: This information is incorrect. The germinal epithelium is not the source of oocytes, as it is not derived from primordial germ cells. 
From "Histology. A Text and Atlas" 5/e by Ross and Pawlina ():
"The term germinal epithelium is a carryover from the past when it was incorrectly thought to be the site of germ cell formation during embryonic development. It is now known that the primordial germ cells (both male and female) are of extragonadal origin and that they migrate from the embryonic yolk sac into the cortex of the embyonic gonad..." (page 774). I will correct the article to the best of my ability but it will need some attention. 129.98.125.180 (talk) 22:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems the claim that the germinal epithelium would be the source of oocytes has been removed now. Mikael Häggström (talk) 00:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Not source of oocytes
Talk:Glossary of anime and manga

message: If someone understands Italian or German, the sources of theses articles might be of use:
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yangire
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yangire
Or if someone has an external source.
--Tuxayo (talk) 04:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request: Yangire 

message: Yandere love is the person 2003:CC:271A:4AE7:912E:71AD:C517:EE8C (talk) 20:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yandere 

message: Josei, kodomo, seinen, shōjo, shōnen, and other terms are not specific to manga or anime. All of these are general-purpose nouns and should be moved to List of English words of Japanese origin.  Shinkansen Fan (talk) 14:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics terms
Talk:Armenian Church, Baku

message: According to Emil Sanamyan, a scholar at the USC Institute of Armenian Studies, argues that calling it a "presidential book depository" is more accurate as "library implies public access which there isn't in this case."
That bit is simply a lie. I've been to the library without any special permission around 4 years ago. The requirement is the same as in the National Library - you should be a student/researcher or something like that. I took a book on Ataturk's language reform there, as I was writing an essay on it. --Мурад 97 (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flemish Council for Science and Innovation

message: Article created to provide additional basic information on science and technology in Flanders. Pvosta 11:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Replacement is the Flemish Industrial Council for Enterprises and Innovation (VARIO).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.225.220.84 (talk) 19:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has been disbanded
Talk:Osei Kwadwo

message: I’ve been listening to the history of africa podcast and the host bemoans the two sentence summary of such an important guy. I’ll be working here (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-dAqd7EXOSqrB7brNZwzooWJQqzDojBRvwtKkRmEP4c/edit) and if you wanna help or peer edit please feel free to :) I’m a very amateur historian with little to no specialisation with the ashanti  Jfiwe (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual Biography
Talk:CINT

message: I don't think that most of the "slander" removed by an anonymous editor recently is too far out of line, but citations and carefully qualifying opinions as such would be a good idea. CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 11:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For these reasons, it is considered by some that rather than an accurate C++ interpreter, CINT can be viewed as a non-deterministic interpreter for an ill-defined macro language whose syntax and behaviour bears a rough, but inaccurate, similarity to C++
didn't make the cut.  I find the comment insightful personally, but it could be considered a little too mean-spirited to be encyclopedic, and I didn't know how to rewrite it.  Project #1 for anyone willing.
I added a link to User:Andybuckley's ROOT criticism page as a citation.  I realize it is Andybuckley's original edits that were an issue to some users, and ideally we should additionally (or instead) have a citation from a source who hasn't personally edited the article, but 1. as far as I can tell from some cursory googling, this is the most extensive single collection of ROOT criticisms, 2. it's no less a qualified expert opinion than many other external links on Wikipedia, and 3. it's not my original research.  In any case, the fact that Wikipedia has articles on subjects such as this one that will probably never be discussed in a peer-reviewed journal means we will need to rely on (possibly biased) individual expert opinion to give a balanced view (otherwise we will have quite a few pro-<insert software project here> articles that read like their respective user manuals).
An interesting project #2 for a disinterested Wikipedipedian with some free time and a web server would be to gather up the criticism/responses from the ROOT mailing list and summarize. CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 09:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Maria Rosseels

message: Article created to provide additional basic information on Belgium. Pvosta 11:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fluorapatite

message: The opening sentence states the Fluorapatite is an "alternate" spelling of the mineral Fluoroapatite.  This is totally false.  The official name, per the International Mineralogical Association, the overseeing body of mineralogy, is Fluorapatite.  and fluoroapatite is the alternate spelling who's use is discouraged. This page should be redirected to Fluorapatite.  Kevmin 04:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: As per my comment of June 10 i am requesting this page be moved the Fluorapatite, currently a redirect to the incorrectly named Fluoroapatite. Kevmin 03:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Done. Vsmith 03:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I'm not sure what it means to say that fluorapatite doesn't "naturally" occur in teeth.  Any chemical routinely found in nature that the body sees fit to take up without conscious intervention surely occurs naturally in the body.  According to this article "A fluoride level as low as 230 ug/g has been shown to significantly reduce the dissolution rate of apatite."  (Since 230 ug/g would be a toxic 230 mg/L I presume they meant 230 ug/L, i.e. 0.23 mg/L.)  So if drinking water drawn from rivers not artificially fluoridated were at this level or higher I would consider the resulting fluorapatite to occur naturally in teeth.  According to the article Fluoride in UK Rivers, "Within the main rivers and tributaries, the mean fluoride concentration varied from approximately 0.5 to over 2 mg/L."  From this standpoint therefore, on average UK residents drinking directly from main rivers would obtain their fluorapatite naturally.  Vaughan Pratt (talk) 22:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "not naturally occurring" 

message: The evidence is clear that fluoride prevents cavities, but there seems to be some confusion about the mechanism for this in the current version of this page. I believe that research shows that it is not fluorapatite itself that is resistant to bacteria, but rather that adding fluoride increases the formation of dental minerals, and thus counteracts the effects of the breakdown of those same minerals from acid-producing bacteria. I believe a study was designed very specifically to distinguish between these two possibilities. I will try to find the study and correct the page if appropriate.
Verazzano (talk) 00:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fluorapatite is resistant to bacteria?
Talk:Blue Mosque, Yerevan

message: Yerevan's Zoravor Surp Astvatsatsin Church, from 1693, also dates from the period of Persian control of Yerevan. Because of this I have deleted the "and the only extant building of the Iranian period in Yerevan" claim that was in the lead. 92.17.52.89 (talk) 19:50, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Only extant building of the Iranian period claim

message: There are a number of claims that need sources or need rewording. The lede "serving Iranians" claim implies non-Iranian Muslims cannot use it but no source unambiguously states this. The wording in the "today" section implies the same when it says "religious and cultural center for the Iranians residing in Armenia and Iranian tourists visiting Armenia". The cited source for this actually says "serves as a hub for a growing number of Iranian residents and tourists". So, is it open for worship for Iranian passport holders only? Are the Mullahs Iranian? Will they kick out non-Iranians? What about non-Shia Muslims? There also seems an over-reliance on the Darieva source, and I don't see why there has to be so many direct quotations from this source within the text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.118.48 (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues of implied and stated Iranian ownership

message: Did the Muslim population of Yerevan consist mostly of Ethnic Persians before 1917? The answer is No. It consisted of Azerbaijani Turks.
Was the Erivan Khanate founded by the ethnic Persian or any other Iranian-ethnic group originated dynasty? The answer is No.
Were the Afshars ethnic Persian? No.
Were the Qajars ethnic Persian? No.
Was Irevan an integral part of Qajar Empire? No. 
Then what is an "Iranian Khanate"? 213.172.93.41 (talk) 12:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yerevan was in fact an integral part of the Qajar Empire, the Khanates were administrative divisions of that state. AlenVaneci (talk) 10:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is 'Iranian' in this context?
Talk:List of cities in Azerbaijan

message: This section and list only includes nine cities. Not ten. Nine. SilverTheTerribleMathematician (talk) 14:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Populous Cities in Azerbaijan  

message: It is so fascinating to me, that the Azerbaijani people, preferred to build cities in the semi arid areas, and not in the more humid and forested areas.  דולב חולב (talk) 02:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azerbaijani cities
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Azerbaijan

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article 