lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Emma (Welsh singer)

message: She released one further single "Dance All Night" on Big Wave records in 1991 which failed to chart.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daytona77 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stourbridge Canal

message: Some one has created an article for Delph Locks: I doubt these are sufficiently significant to merit an article of their own: the article should probably be merged with Dudley Canal.  Stourbridge Town Arm and Fens Pools have been given brackets, making them red links.  I would recommend that these should not become new articles, but new sections on these should be added to this article.  This may enable this article to cease to be a stub.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions
Talk:Isotopologue

message: Isotopomer is a contraction of isotopic isomer (check IUPAC).  Thus how can an isotopologue (a distinctly different beast) be an isotopic isomer?  ;-)  Check the definition of an isomer.  Isotopologues are not even isomers.  150.203.35.113 (talk) 02:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see anything in the article that contradicts what you are saying. DMacks (talk) 05:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not isotopic isomer

message: There seems to be ambiguity in the definition given in the article.  It says that the three isotopomers of monodeuterated ethanol (––OH, ––OH, and ––OD) are the same isotopologue, okay.  But what about –O–? Is it the same isotopologue, or a diferent one? --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 17:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead says "They have the same chemical formula and bonding arrangement of atoms, but at least one atom has a different number of neutrons than the parent.". The dimethyl ether do not have the same bonding arrangement as ethanol, i.e. its a different functional isomer. Christian75 (talk) 18:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concept not completely defined
Talk:Elfland

message: This page needs a disambiguation page.  I was looking for Elfland, North Carolina (Zip code 27423) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherylrenee (talk • contribs) 18:24, 18 April 2007‎ 
:Perhaps you mean Efland, North Carolina ? Btyner (talk) 22:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Talk:William Holmes (politician)

message: The article state: "Holmes serving as party manager, and Chief Whip in the House of Commons from about 1802."  As the article also states that Holmes was first elected in 1812 this can not be correct - unless that is he was elected prior to 1802.
217.155.193.205 (talk) 09:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the date 1802 correct?
Talk:Mitch Morris

message: :He's done about half a dozen gay-related film and TV projects. --98.232.180.37 (talk) 11:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it matters. You're gay 24 hours a day. --RThompson82 (talk) 18:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ...Umm.. This guy is gay, right? =

message: This man is an actor and plays roles where he pretends to be someone else or a pretends to be fictional character dreamed up by a writer. That's what actors do.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.92.60.56 (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it matters. You're gay 24 hours a day. --RThompson82 (talk) 18:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it matter?
Talk:Mitch Rouse

message: Does the blurb about Oak Ridge being the home of the Atomic Bomb truly need to be in this bio?  Seems kind of dumb to me.  I'd edit it out, but I'm afraid I'd be accused of vandalism again... 173.48.117.217 (talk) 21:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mitchell and Webb

message: This article totally leaves out Peep Show.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.183.42.130 (talk) 06:40, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a lot/too much information about this show on David Mitchell's page which i feel should be merged into this. Especially considering that sub section is actually larger than this article. Uksam88 (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there's "too much" information on Mitchell's page. This page (which I believe to be totally uncessary) was created after that one was brought to GA status. If you feel its a problem that this article is short, then expand it. I really see no benefit in removing information from another page, because another article is shorter. Gran2 07:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, apart from their work together, they have separate careers, in particular Mitchell has appeared in QI, Would I Lie to you?, and does voiceovers for history programmes. Since this argument hasn't advanced in a year, I'll untag the article. Rodhullandemu 00:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[David Mitchell (actor)#Mitchell and Webb]] 

message: ‘Mitchell and Webb’ appears in the title of the Family Guy episode entitled Sheila Cornhole and the Mitchell & Webb Glam Fam Sales Force and as the name of a sales company in that episode. Surely that is a reference to David and Robert’s comedy oeuvre which may warrant a mention? Overlordnat1 (talk) 00:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Dad
Talk:William Kingston Flesher

message: Wm Henry, in fact, married in 1881 with the family being mentioned in Martha Sargent's 1938 Obit
1.  Cda Ontario 1881 Schedule B - Marriages p281, Simcoe County, Div Oro, Record #010555 between William Henry Flesher and Martha Sargeant. Viewed at Familysearch.org for Martha Sargent code: K82M-YRW November 29, 2022
2.  Newspapers: Edmonton Journal 1938 January 22 page 20 for Mrs Martha Flesher 108.63.118.93 (talk) 02:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Henry Flesher in the bio for Wm Kingston Flesher
Talk:Discontinuous reception

message: I am trying to find out the meaning of @DRX9, so far I know it is related to low power compsumptionon mobile phones/devices, however, I am not fully aware of the exact meaning of this, just found it on a Specs of some devices.
Could someone give further explanation on this?
AMARAL
DRX9 corresponding to handset wake up nearly every second to synchronize to the network, this is the longest sleep time, the shortest period is nearly 4 times per second wake up  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.10.60.85 (talk) 13:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Eric Booker

message: Sometime, we need to organize a group of people to completely overhaul this wiki page because it is severely out of date Dreammmemek (talk) 04:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This wiki page really needs work
Talk:1920 APFA season

message: I understand that the Cardinals were called Racine (after the street in Chicago) during the 1920 and 21 seasons.Smith03 (talk) 17:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chicago vs Racine Cardinals

message: Listed: Racine Cardinals (3-2-2), Columbus Panhandles (0-4-0); tabulated from the game list: Racine Street (Chicago) Cardinals (3-2-1), Columbus Panhandles (0-5-0).
The "divisional" point scores are, 95-7 for Akron, 67-14 for Decatur, 74-19 for Buffalo, 34-26 for Racine Street, 98-35 for Rock Island, 127-47 for Dayton, 6-17 for Rochester, 72-44 for Canton, 6-61 for Detroit, 14-46 for Cleveland, 22-63 for Chicago (Tigers), 7-98 for Hammond, 7-107 for Columbus and 0-45 for Muncie. I'll let someone else tabulate the end-of-season division-only won-loss-tied streaks and whether to add the divisional total point scores. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6000:AA4D:C5B8:0:3361:EAF8:97B7 (talk) 02:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Divisional" records in error 
Talk:1927 NFL season

message: "The league also, for reasons unexplained, removed all five of the black players then playing top-level pro football from the league, including future Hall of Famer Fritz Pollard."
Is there a citation for this? The league went from five to zero black players, but I'm not aware of any evidence (or claim for that matter) that the league itself conducted a purge. The return of black players in 1928 suggests otherwise.
There is an obvious alternative explanation: 60% of the NFL and AFL franchises from 1926 collapsed before the start of the 1927 season. Fewer teams == fewer players == fewer black players.
If this line comes back, it should come with a citation.50.14.78.218 (talk) 18:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

message: The image map that shows where the teams are located has the Eskimo's in the wrong location as well as the wrong country.  They were located in Duluth, Minnesota, not somewhere up in Canada 96.241.126.28 (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1927 NFL Season
Talk:William Lunn (politician)

message: My aunt lived in his constituency and with his help was one of the early beneficiaries of orphan's allowance.  She eventually married his grandson.  
I have scanned legible campaign leaflets from the Dec-1918, Oct-1924 and May 1929 elections  which appear to be public domain and are arguably one of the best sources about the subject and his policies, perhaps even the elections.  I'm aware that this is not normal procedure but does anyone have a problem with loading these for use as a reference?  If it helps, to me they seem authoritive and fascinating in their own right.  I understand the University of Hull also has a copy.  There are 2 additional ministerial photos, 1 from Illustrated London News in 1924 and an undated one probably at around the same time but I don't understand the the copyright issues for these.  Advice appreciated.
JRPG (talk) 22:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: RFC is only for disagreements between users, not checking if something is ok to do. See WP:BOLD.--Otterathome (talk) 21:32, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election Campaigns
Talk:Soho Square

message: I read somewhere that Soho Square is the only square square in London. Jackiespeel (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, "somewhere" is apparently not a reliable source. A simple look at the satellite image shows that St. James's Square or Belgrave Square are also square squares. --ELEKHHT 12:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Shape
Talk:Frank Richter Jr.

message: There are few other MLAs for Similkameen (electoral district) or its successor Boundary-Similkameen, but still as an MLA bio this page should have a succession box, which I don't know how to make well (or well maybe I'm just too lazy).Skookum1 19:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See this this page. Real96 22:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession box needed

message: Is this article about two different people? --KenWalker | Talk 06:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates wrong

message: Is he still alive?  Where does it say he's still alive?  No dates are in the article.  He hasn't been an MLA since the '70s...maybe he's still alive, but he'd be very old.Skookum1 (talk) 09:37, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Living switch?
Talk:William O'Shea

message: This article states his wife was "Wexford-born", implying she was of Irish birth and possibly Anglo-Irish if not ethnically Irish. However, the article on Katherine states she was born in Braintree, Essex, England, daughter of Sir John Page Wood, 2nd Baronet, who was of an English family originated in Gloucestershire.Cloptonson (talk) 11:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife
Talk:Monang Carvajal

message: Please note that Monang Carvajal's birthdate was given as March 30 and June 30 in a prior edit, and I was unable to find via Google search any birthdate for her on the net. Note that Tagalog Wikipedia's
Monang Carvajal article has no dates of birth or death. 
Given the discrepancy I rv the date of birth and left the year (1898), which is not sourced, but I'll leave it for now. If anyone knows for sure whether she was born on March 30 or June 30, please feel free to enter it (and source/reference information/link). Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 18:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I had originally provided for the 1898 birthdate. It came from the CCP Encyclopedia of Philippine Art (not online). However, I mistakenly provided for different dates in the infobox and the article itself. I suspect that June 30 is correct, but I've misplaced my notes. 1898 for now. --Anyo Niminus (talk) 10:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Disciples III: Renaissance

message: :Disciples 3: Renaissance → Disciples III: Renaissance — I am requesting a move to the official title of Disciples III: Renaissance to conform with the Roman numerals shown in prerelease logos and boxart (example here: http://en.akella.com/Files/News/495/Disciples-3-Logo.jpg, and others are visible in Google - tried to post another but the link is blacklisted). If there is already an established rationale for the current title that I'm not aware of then I will not contest a revert. Monere (talk) 14:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Monica Bedi

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.apnicommunity.com/big-boss-2/74885-monica-bedi-married-abu-salem.html and http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1301773.cms. Infringing material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The page says model and TV presenter and Anchor but does not corroborate that. To my knowledge, she has not done any of these things in her career.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.65.166 (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupations? 
Talk:1970 NFL season

message: "Division alignment in 1970 was largely intended to preserve the pre-merger setups, keeping traditional rivals in the same division. Plans were also made to add two expansion teams, but this would not take place until 1976, seven years after the merger."
This makes no sense given the fact that the NFC alignment was randomly selected from a vase. there was 5 plans in the vase for the nfc the one selected was the ONLY one had Minnesota in the central and Dallas in the East, so it is hard to say the plans were designed to keep pre 1970 setups  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.116.191.43 (talk) 00:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

message: I'm curious what the asterisks indicate. I did a search for them in hopes of finding some indication, but only found the 21 instances... nothing explaining what they mean. DiamondKnight19 (talk) 11:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: They apparently indicate that there was a tie in the standings, and that the team indicated was ahead on tie-breakers. Why it's done for some ties but not all, I don't know. Bmf 051 (talk) 02:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division races 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved per WP:SNOW and Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League#Naming conventions. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Jalen Folf (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 February 2021
Talk:1976 NFL season

message: I just reverted a change which replaces player ejection with player disqualification, as I felt the new version was less clear. In NFL legalese, disqualification may be a synonym, but for the average fan, ejection from the game is much more likely to be understood. Disqualification may not be understood as immediate removal from the field of play, which is the intent of the rules. Comments? Tarl N. (discuss) 19:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ejected vs. Disqualified 
Talk:1977 NFL season

message: There seems to be a mistake in this season's result for the AFC Eastern Conference.The final positions of the New York Jets and the Buffalo Bills have been swapped. This is evident in the fact that for the 1978 season the Bills' schedule is was made using the fifth placed team's formula, whereas the Jets' schedule was made using the normal formula. Tvx1 (talk) 20:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFC East result 
Talk:1978 NFL season

message: The 2019 Baltimore Ravens have surpassed the '78 Patriots in all-time team rushing yards per season. Joeylawn (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rushing Yards Per Team Record 
Talk:1979 NFL season

message: There is a mistake in the NFC Wildcards race on Week 15. It says Vikings and Saints are tied with a record of 8-7, Giants with 6-9, which is impossible. The Vikings even finished the season with 7-9 which means they could never have had a record of 8-7.
--2a02:908:2422:a1a0:bd94:d092:9b3e:80c2 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 4 December 2017‎ (UTC)
:It would appear to have been caused by this edit in 2009. The proper numbers should be 7-8, it appears. Does this make sense? Tarl N. (discuss) 20:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in Division Races 
Talk:William R. Timken

message: I couldn't find the reference : "Diaries of Foreign Affairs, Berlin 2004, Vol. 3, p. 28".
Could we have the publisher or ISSN, and some more details?
--Boson (talk) 12:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the statement and will continue to do so unless WP:VER, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR is satisfied.  As a WP:BLP, I need to see sources that can be clearly and reliably sourced.  In addition, the IP in question 84.141.3.164 has added a number statements which are close to violating NPOV.  If something is added, it should be weighted against the body of opinions and works in major, credible sources and satisfy all criterion of the BLP policy.  --Jh12 (talk) 23:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Diaries of Foreign Affairs
Talk:1980 NFL season

message: ::Raiders fans reliving the Los Angeles nightmare, The Press Democrat, Phil Barber, Dec. 14, 2015.
::'  .  .  .  At one point, the move was impacted by four major lawsuits. The Los Angeles Coliseum Commission sued the NFL, charging antitrust violations. The NFL sued the Raiders for breach of contract. Raiders season ticket holders brought a class-action suit against the team. And the City of Oakland filed for eminent domain, attempting to take control of the team “in the public interest.”  .  .  '
::'  .  .  .  On Dec. 1 of that year, thousands of fans stayed outside the Oakland Coliseum for the first five minutes of a big Monday night game against the Broncos. The Raiders tried to undermine the effort by sending cheerleaders into the parking lot to entice tailgaters with promise of a new pregame routine. It didn’t work. Some accounts noted that “almost two-thirds” of the stadium seats were empty at kickoff. At the 2-minute warnings, the crowd held up signs reading “Save Our Raiders.”  .  .  '
----------------------------------------
And "planned future" should be emphasized for the Raiders played the entire 1980 season in Oakland including winning the Superbowl.
This article includes that in the previous off-season on March 10, 1980, NFL owners voted 22-0 at their annual meeting not to allow the Raiders to move (with the Raiders not participating, and five teams abstaining).
  
I think some of this is worth including, along with this and possibly other references. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: https://books.google.com/books?id=3HUK2iO0d-kC&pg=PT106&dq=Raiders+Davis+22-0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj2lZr_wYDaAhVLZKwKHZAIBLEQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=Raiders%20Davis%2022-0&f=false
This book looks like it also has some good information. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 18:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  more info on Oakland Raiders planned future move to Los Angeles? 
Talk:1988 NFL season

message: I believe this page needs a correction in the Tiebreakers section:
"L.A. Rams finished second in the NFC West based on better division record (4-2) than New Orleans (3-3), and earned the last NFC Wild Card based on better conference record (8-4) than N.Y. Giants (9-5) and New Orleans (6-6)."
As written, it appears the Giants have a better conference record  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.66.63 (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiebreaker Correction? 

message: For anyone who may be confused by this  -- The L.A. Rams earned the 2nd NFC Wild Card position based on better conference record (8–4) than the N.Y. Giants (9–5) and New Orleans (6–6) -- here's an explanation.
N.Y. Giants played 14 NFC opponents in 1988, while L.A. Rams and New Orleans Saints each played 12 NFC opponents. This is based on (A) the six division alignment of the 28 NFL teams at that time, and (B) the scheduling rules of the same period, which allowed all 28 teams to each have a 16-game schedule. The Giants finished 5th in the NFC East in 1987, and for 1988 played, as did other 5th place division finishers, a 16-game schedule that included 14 in-conference and 2 other-conference opponents. By contrast, any 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th place team in any division plays 12 in-conference and 4 out-of-conference opponents. The conference record tiebreaker was based on best winning percentage vs same-conference opponents. When this method is employed, we find that the L.A. Rams had a winning percentage of .667 (8-of-12), vs .642 (9-of-14) for the N.Y. Giants and .500 (6-of-12) for the New Orleans Saints.
Thanx-A-Lot, Fgf2007 (talk) 02:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of L.A. Rams clinching the #2 wild card in 1988 
Category talk:Members of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia

message: Suggest new subcat: :Category:British Columbia MLAs (historical) or :Category:Historical British Columbia MLAs or something equivalent; I just created the father-son Richter articles and it's obvious that once all past MLA articles are written this category is going to be huge....also suggest a :Category:British Columbia cabinet ministers to winnow the wheat from the chaff, so to speak; because of shifting portfolios it's impossible to have a proper lineage-sequence for e.g. Minister of Mines (British Columbia) or Minister of Public Works (British Columbia) or Minister of Forests and so on; but "cabinet minister" should suffice I'd think unless Privy Councillor is more Wiki-standard (but then would include opposition leaders and others, no?).Skookum1 18:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: there is a :Category:Canadian ministers which obviously should be a parent cat to any BC cabinet ministers cat.Skookum1 19:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see I already posted about this ,figured worth plugging it again - :Category:Former British Columbia MLAs with appropriate party subcats seems needed, perhaps also with a parallel :Category:Current British Columbia MLAs.Skookum1 (talk) 20:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1995 NFL season

message: Who the hell did this? Did they make up the scores as they went? Being a Cowboys fan, I know that the Super Bowl was Dallas 27, Pittsburgh 17, and the NFC Championship was Dallas 38, Green Bay 27. Someone needs to get this fixed ASAP. I don't even want to know what they put down for other years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.133.233.124 (talk) 16:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scores in the playoff games 