lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:LGBT rights opposition

message: The second paragraph notes that it may be motivated by "religion, moral beliefs, homophobia, transphobia, bigotry, animosity, political ideologies, or other reasons". But homophobia, transphobia and especially animosity aren't motivations for opposing it but rather ways said opposition may express itself in/contribute to. Someone doesn't oppose their rights because they're X-phobic, they oppose rights and they're X-phobic (because of another reason). Religion, moral beliefs, bigotry and political ideologies are all possible (as well as the "or other reasons"), but, while they are linked, the phobias and animosity aren't. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 11:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not motivations 

message: Hello. I was reading your article, and I just have to say that a majority of the "LGBT rights opposition" only includes countries' and groups views on homosexuality in general. That's great to talk about when it comes to the "G" in "LGBT", but I've yet to find much to talk about transgender rights opposition, or the entire group in general. Flame486 (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT Doesn't only mean gay...  

message: In the list of motivations for the movement we list both bigotry and religion. Aren't these two synonyms? Religions tend to teach their adherents to hate other people, and to discriminate in their behavior towards others. Dimadick (talk) 08:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd need to specify from what to what you want changed. If you're agrument is to get rid of the word religion, I would oppose because its not commonly accepted that bigotry equals religion. If you are wanting to make an argument that relgion equals bigotry, as 2603:6011:2C00:3C5:3FD6:F17B:55EB:1EAB (talk) 03:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonyms
Template talk:UK-politician-stub

message: The template text has "UK-politician-stub", but the text produced says "British politician". United Kingdom and Great Britain are not exactly the same thing, so the stub text should probably be reworded.
--TheParanoidOne 23:10, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: UK vs British

message: Can we change the image? 1) It doesn't work well as a small picture. 2) The tomb of an English King is hardly the best image for modern British politicians. What about a profile of the palace of Westminster? A party rossette? Or even an image of Churchill? Almost anything would be better.
I've made the image a shot of Big Ben. I feel it is more representative of British parliament and its politicians than Churchill, who is an icon in his own right. I was getting confused seeing his picture everywhere. - Randwicked 03:56, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub image

message: Jengod's edit to the stub should be removed asap. He's apparently decided to add "and cite your sources" to a ton of stubs, without consulting anybody else first. And now, everytime an article is double- or triple-stubbed, we'll see the "and cite your sources" two, three or four times! That edit should be removed by an administrator asap. --Valentinian 14:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kill the "and cite your sources" bit.
Talk:Kujawiak Włocławek

message: This article was unsuccessfully proposed for deletion; see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Kujawiak Wloclawek for a record.  Postdlf 23:20, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dave Koz

message: The User:71.255.64.182 deleted the picture of Dave Koz without any explanation. I'm assuming It's a vandal.
I have restored the picture.
--Folini 07:13, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless, page needs a musicians' infobox and I'm uploading a better photo. Sweet-I'm a member of the LGBT crew, the biography crew, and musicians crew on WP! --leahtwosaints (talk) 04:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored the picture 

message: I added a better indisputable photo and edited it a bit. --leahtwosaints (talk) 08:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Photo 

message: These sources do not ever belong in External links. I have moved the link farm there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning: I didn't check them over, so be careful in choosing any references here. Thank you.--Leahtwosaints (talk) 14:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources do not belong  in external links- they  belong here! 
Talk:Ingelger

message: To claim that Ingelger is the the forefather of the present Queen of england is to stretch it a bit.
That he is the forefather of Henry II, plantagenet is true, though the british line is broken may times - F.ex. George I (house of hanover) is only on his mother's side affiliated with the norman kings of england and that is only through his mother's mother Elisabeth daughter of James I, who again can only claim to be the great great grand child of Henry VII, king of England again only through the female line.
Accepting such, would mean that all the royal and for that matter most of the noble houses in europe are one big familly. - unsigned comment
:. . . which is quite true. --Michael K. Smith 5 July 2005 21:16 (UTC)
::Any significant/direct link between Ingelger and the ruling dynasties in Great Britain were broken when James II was usurped. Genelogically as pointed out above, its totally broken after that. I mean if Edward IV of England is illigitimate, as many sources claim he was, then the Tudors and Stuarts in England didn't have a direct link to Ingelger either. If this is the case then the last direct descendent of Ingelger on the throne was Richard III of England. On this basis I am changing the article. - True as Blue (talk) 06:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Queen Elizabeth stretch
Talk:Basilica of Bom Jesus

message: I don't know how to include this in the basilica article: Bom Dia means hello in Portuguese, so Bom Jesus means 'Hello Jesus!'  This should be interpreted in a rather positive light.  In spite of its positivity, an Architecture scholar would be better at writing this than me.  --McDogm 00:13, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Its "Good Jesus" =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:20, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
Bom is Good in portuguese, so Bom Jesus is Good Jesus.
Yessrao a.k.a Sushanth 09:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

text: When is was finished in 1695, why does the text say, that it is more than 400 years old? Has there been a previous building with the same name or is it a mistake? --El bes (talk) 18:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: where is it located in?  exact location...please?
i want to send this(117.204.136.162 (talk) 07:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 

message: Kindly place the images as discussed in the citation. for example if in a link it is written 'last supper' which is highlighted in blue or even connected for link, the image should be in relate to the church itself so that a relevant and authentic information about the image there in church could be accessed..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.232.17.94 (talk) 05:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  image should be from the church 

message: Clear 157.35.1.213 (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basilica of bom Jesus
Talk:Banyan VINES

message: The following quote from the article is incorrect:
By the late 1990s this performance edge became irrelevant and then disappeared, as VINES could use a maximum of only 96 MB of RAM and a single processor due to its aging SVR3 underpinnings, preventing it from taking advantage of newer hardware. 
I worked for a Banyan reseller between 1990 and 1999, and it definitely did support more than one processor, as we had several customers running SMP based SystemPros and similar certified machines. There was a problem at one time specific to SMP machines and Banyan's serial card driver which caused a fax gateway we sold to fail to work on such a platform.
I think the 96MB limit too is incorrect.
Banyan's own CNS servers were single processor and indeed limited to 96MB of RAM. Each server could take up to 3 memory boards, with each one having a capacity of up to 32MB. I never saw one of these servers running more than 32MB in the field, as memory for these was extremely expensive. These ceased being sold around 1991 or so. --84.69.74.120 14:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multi-Processor Support 

message: This article needs timeframes when the technology was introduced.  When?  1990?  1970?  1853? -Rolypolyman 16:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeframe needed 

message: Banyan VINES was THE system used until Windows NT migration in the late 90's early 2000 by the United States Department of Defense.  I think this should be mentioned in the article, it was an extreme close tie to the company.  When the DoD stopped using Banyan Vines version 8.5 (the last version) is what made the company fold the Network Operating System (NOS).  70.125.43.99 14:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Banyan VINES in the Military

message: I think the MS/IBM story jumped a tooth in here somewhere. As I recall, LAN Manager was just an MS product but that MS and IBM partnered together and, using some ex-DEC folks who had worked on VMS and its clustering model (which is why NT clustering and VMS clustering used some of the same terminology), jointly developed a DOS-less kernel-based OS with a windowed GUI console much as Apple and the Amiga had (although, AmigaDOS was further out into multitasking-land than anything MS or Apple had for consumer PCs of any CPU up until the Windows NT era). But while that was going on, MS and IBM parted ways on the project and as a result IBM produced OS/2 from that work and similarly MS produced Windows NT.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.157.54.144 (talk) 01:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  LAN Manager? What about OS/2?
Talk:Yasumasa Kanada

message: Why is this guy in the category 1438? 137.222.230.13 (talk) 18:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1438? 

message: So was he born in 1948 or 1949 (as stated on the first line and as a category respectively)? --David Edgar (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here it is written that Kanada Yasumasa was born on April 18, 1948 in Hyogo, Japan, and not 1949 as claimed in WP in unison. Unfortunately, the sources were all unreachable, but at least now doubts about his year of birth seem appropriate. --Bodhi-Baum (talk) 22:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth
Talk:UniQ Aotearoa

message: As far as I know, fa'afafine are not necessarily homosexual. I thought fa'afafine was more a term describing gender than sexual orientation. To me it doesn't fall into the same category as lesbian, etc. Either it's misplaced to include fa'afafine in this article, or the description of what UniQ encompasses needs a bit of refining. Or, UniQ is confusing gender with sexual orientation. Any thoughts? Mona-Lynn 00:40, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:County Kerry

message: Is the green part (of the picture) kerry or is the red part kerry?
*The lime green part is Kerry; the pink is Northern Ireland, a separate country coloured differently to distinguish it from the Republic of Ireland. Tadhg 11:48, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the origen of the word Kerry (or Ciarrai).  Does it mean Kingdom as suggested in the article?   - Kerry in New Mexico, USA
*It's not entirely clear, certainly not enough for inclusion in the article. It was probably either named after Ciar, King of Ulster (Carruidhe or Cair Reeght: "Kingdom of Ciar") or - not so romantic - it's named after the Irish word for "rock" ("ciar" or "cer") and "a district on the water" ("uidhe" or "ui"). See Ancient Clans of County Kerry. --Tadhg 15:18, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  origen of Kerry 

message: The Irish for Walsh is Breathnach, which literally means Welsh ( as in the nationality), so I'm assuming it isn't a Kerry surname!! I'm removing it from the list, if I'm wrong please correct me! 195.213.112.110 13:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walsh as a Kerry surname?? 

message: Why are Wolfe Tone and Roger Casement not listed under "Historical Figures"? 
Rachel Pearce 10:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not historical people? 

message: I am not Irish, nor English. I feel the history section of this article has been composed in a very partisan manner and is anything but neutral. David Lauder 19:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Unreliable, almost offensive article. What a shame! Heard of revisionism?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.255.8.108 (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  bias 

message: Apology for the lack of courtesy- new to this. I made the above comment.Michelle   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.255.8.108 (talk) 09:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  failure to sign 

message: Should the Tralee Ship Canal no be given a mention in the 'transport' section ?
King dumb (talk) 01:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tralee Ship Canal 

message: What are the origins of Co. Kerry's Motto? I couldn't find anything after searching...--Somchai Sun (talk) 21:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I removed your edit before I realised you had started a discussion on this. Do you have a reference or source you could quote so that it can be included in the info. --Dmol (talk) 06:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto.
Template talk:Witchcraft

message: Delete becuase there is only one article with useful information (European witchcraft) — Stevey7788 (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: what is the point of creating a template with lots of redlinks, apparently with no intention to ever write the articles linked? I created redirects now, but this template should really be altered to link to a useful collection of existing articles, not to what somebody at some point thought would be useful to have. dab (𒁳) 08:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The template has since been filled up, rendering this need for deletion obsolete. (Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete
Wikipedia talk:Mediation (2005)

message: This proposal is constantly under editing. If you wish to review the original proposal, I'll link it here for completeness sake: User:Inter/Mediation policy. Inter\Echo 01:08, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

message: The core of the proposal is firmed up now though my collaborators will need to take a look.
We will be putting in some suggested changes for the committee page as well as the case submission page over the next day or so.  --Wgfinley 02:38, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somewhat Firmed Up Now 

message: An initial draft can be viewed here: Wikipedia:Mediation (2005)/Requests for mediation. Any comments are very welcome, as this is very rough. It is based on the ArbCom request page, although made gentler and any voting is thrown out. The fields should be pretty self explanatory, but if any questions, feel free to ask. Inter\Echo 11:16, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The front page 

message: And am sorry that my wikifatigue has kept me absent from mediation pages for so long.  It was probably unwise for me to accept my nomination as Chair, given that I had never been involved with mediation, and given that I stepped in entirely unaware of the colossal problems facing mediation here.  Given my still-limited awareness of what is truly going on with Wikipedia mediation, I believe this addresses many of the issues I was concerned about, although I look forward to any innovations added by other editors with a vision of how to make this work. Jwrosenzweig 22:01, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad to have your support James, I wanted to make it clear that this had nothing to do with the folks currently on Mediation, the process itself needed an overhaul.  I'm glad you took it the right way and are supportive, feel free to add observations given your experience in doing it so far.  --Wgfinley 00:58, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I did send you an email about it JW, but I did not recieve a reply, thats perfectly all right as I know you have been absent. I am glad that you endorse this proposal. :> Inter\Echo 10:49, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I like this proposal

message: I don't like this, esp. the section titled "General Mediation" for the simple fact that the "volunteer mediators" might not be skilled in handling disputes and might just make matters worse. And if official mediators are used, it would be virtually the same as formal mediation. JMBell° 13:25, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm not sure I like this proposal
Talk:Momentum space

message: * a simple example could be added
* the math should be checked
* perhaps an analogy should be made to linear algebra where a change in basis is more intuitive.
--V. 18:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  to do list 

message: I just made an edit and undid it. The following is unclear to me:
:\psi(x)=\sum_k \phi_k \psi_k(x)
First the page says that phi_k(x) are basis functions, then that psi_k(x) are. If I read this as a change of basis from x -> k, then phi_k is just the coefficient of psi in the k direction, and psi_k(x) is the coefficient of the psi_k basis vector in the x direction, no? So shouldn't we call psi_k (not psi_k(x)) the momentum eigenfunctions?
(Edit: on further thought, I guess one has to make explicit this dependence on x if one is writing in the position basis. I wonder if this can be made more clear though.)
76.93.124.92 (talk) 20:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Momentum eigenfunctions? 

message: I've sat through 4 semesters on quantum mechanics and I still haven't seen the derivation that
\hat p = -i \hbar\frac{d}{d x} 
or any generalization thereof.  What is the theoretical basis for this?--Loodog (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is how the momentum operator is defined.  It can't be derived from theory.  The reason it's called "momentum" is because in the classical limit it approaches the classical definition of momentum, which can be shown. Rckrone (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is the momentum operator what it is? 

message: It is my understanding that k-space is synonymous with momentum space. I'm most familiar with k-space being used in terms of reciprocal lattices in crystallography. Would it be wrong to mention in the introduction something like "momentum space, also known as k-space"? Larryisgood (talk) 17:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  k-space 

message: What is the relevance of linear combinations of discrete basis functions φk? Given that r and k are continuous vectors, only the integrals are needed... Delete the sums? It’s not like they introduce the reader to the concept of adding basis functions in the continuous way, they can see wavefunction and Schrödinger equation for how wavefunctions are sums of discrete bases and integrals of continuous basis... Maschen (talk) 08:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summation? 

message: This can and should be done. I'll do it now. Maschen (talk) 08:36, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Maschen (talk) 08:58, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrade remainder of article to 3d
Talk:Vanapagan

message: This article was unsuccessfully nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Vanatühi for a record.  Postdlf 02:24, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

message: In the Estonian language today, the generally known name for this being is Vanapagan, even academic folklorists prefer Vanapagan. I think that Vanatühi (as well as Vanatont, Vanajuudas and several dozen other vernacular names known in dialects) should be considered alternative. Therefore, I propose that the page be moved to Vanapagan and that Vanatühi should remain a redirect. -- Ohpuu (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "alternative" name
Talk:Asahi Pentax

message: A nice start, but a bit short, and listing no sources. Should not the word "camera" appear far earlier in the article? LordAmeth 22:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Project Assessment

message: Currently the article claims:
:... film speed reminder around the film rewind crank, a location that remained standard even when the dial went from being merely a reminder to the photographer to actually controlling the light-meter built into later SLRs.
The position only remained there until the SV.  The Spotmatic has the film speed setting in the shutter dial on the right.  I'll changed the article accordingly.  Groogle (talk) 05:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film speed reminder
Talk:Mother-in-law joke

message: Probably doesn't meet criteria for speedy deletion, although some sources would be nice. 24.54.208.177 02:40, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

message: This is still a common and recurring joke in many sitComs, is mother in law jokes really considered politically incorrect?
:I agree. Mother-in-law jokes are still very common and not considered in bad taste in most places. Besides, mothers-in-law are not a political demographic, which means that making fun of them cannot be "politically incorrect". I'm removing it. Kafziel 15:49, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politically incorrect?
Talk:Battle of White Oak Swamp

message: It swould be great if some civil war buff could put a GPS location for White oak swamp so we could see the geography of this battle.  MPS 16:10, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not physically there, but from NPS maps it looks like it is at Latitude: 37.4674, Longitude: -77.2078. Not much interesting terrain. Hal Jespersen 20:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: topozone shows a cool swamp Topozone MPS 21:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  map 
Talk:Amerika (Rammstein song)

message: " During a concert in Gothenburg, Sweden on July 30, 2005, Till Lindemann suffered a knee injury when Flake accidentally ran into him with the Segway. This caused concerts scheduled in Asia to be canceled"
Is this really necessary?--Schwarzes Nacht 13:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Eh?

message: Quiero decir que americanos son todos quienes viven en América, no sólo los gringos. Chile linguistic (talk) 18:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apropiación de un nombre
Talk:Suicide bridge

message: is it really notable to mention that people drive across the oakland bay bridge to jump off the golden gate?  The oakland bay bridge is impossible to access as a pedestrian. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.210.75.70 (talk) 04:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  oakland bay bridge 

message: The intro needs to be revised a bit. The introductory sentence, "It is a well-known phenomenon that certain bridges are especially popular for people attempting suicide." is not in an encyclopedic tone. Well-known? --W3stfa11 16:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: intro

message: Perhaps the discussion of anti-suicide barriers at the Golden Gate Bridge should mention that Jim Jones (of Jonestown murder-suicide fame) proposed the barrier. 68.83.72.162 (talk) 10:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Suicide barriers 

message: Why does this article exist? It seems to be original research, in the sense that the phrase "suicide bridge" is not actually used to refer to anything in reality, and the term is being invented or popularized by this article. --76.224.94.69 (talk) 00:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hornsey Lane Bridge in Archway, London is most definitely called this throughout London and would be recognized through much of the UK as referring to that bridge. 86.166.180.242 (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

text: This article exists because of notability. I visited one ( Mapo ), and live by another ( Golden Gate ). This article may prevent some suicides, but that is not any intentional purpose of wikipedia, which seems to drive people to these bridges. 170.75.140.124 (talk) 18:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete this 

message: Was discussed here   Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Hotline