lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Submission (disambiguation)

message: Where can I see 'Submission?'...Is there an English version (aus tu blicht)?  Help, please!
Morris — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎84.65.217.254 (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film 

message: * Submission_%28film%29 is a 10-minute English-language film directed by Theo van Gogh and written by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a former Liberal party member of the Lower House of the Netherlands Parliament.
Hopiakuta 02:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: * [[Submission_%28film%29]] is a 10-minute

message: Residology provides a stylish, eco-friendly "home away from home" to anyone in need of temporary housing in South Texas. We partner with beautiful local apartment communities and add our signature furnishings and utilities to provide fully furnished apartments and corporate housing for our clients.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickgrant (talk • contribs) 12:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residology
Talk:Tres Hombres

message: I think Hard rock and blues rock is enough to cover it and people will get the point. 2602:306:8B83:4860:58D:190C:D4F2:3950 (talk) 01:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many genres 

message: There's a harmonica solo in "Waiting for the Bus". Who plays it? -lifeform (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Billy Gibbons plays harmonica (and fiddle) on Tejas, so I've always assumed it was him. The original vinyl record sleeve has no musician credits at all. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: So why have we now got James Harman credited on two tracks?? As far as I know, there is no harmonica at all on "Jesus Just Left Chicago". Martinevans123 (talk) 20:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed it. Harman played on the live version of both songs on their 2016 live album, but he didn't work with the band until 1996. Jules TH 16 (talk) 20:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harmonica 

message: My 1973 vinyl cover just says: "Thanks to ROBIN BRYAN / BRIAN STUDIO and TERRY MANNING / ARDENT STUDIO". It doesn't say who engineered which tracks and where. Similarly with allmusic.com. Anyone got any better sources? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Manning's own forum posts, he wasn't there during the initial tracking phase and only became involved with overdubbing and editing.Jules TH 16 (talk) 20:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, well I guess that's as good as we're gonna get. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In case you want an actual quote, here's him saying it. So, Brian was recording engineer, and Terry did additional recording and mixing. https://repforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/topic,5576.msg52785.html#msg52785 Jules TH 16 (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha yes, I'd seen that before with regards to the segue between "Jesus Just Left Chicago" and "Waitin For The Bus". We already have the PRW forum as a source in the article (although we probably shouldn't). Martinevans123 (talk) 21:27, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Terry Manning]] 

message: On Beer Drinkers and Hellraisers,
With my can of dinner and a bunch of fine
*Can of dinner: presumably beer. 
* Bunch of fine
** wiktionary:fine#Noun not likely.
** wiktionary:pine not likely.
Jidanni (talk) 10:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention lyrics meanings
Talk:Old Chinatown, Toronto

message: Old Chinatown, Toronto was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT
*Refactor of Chinatown, Toronto when no refactor needed.Samw 01:59, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Merepeka Raukawa-Tait

message: The newly added last par says "Raukawa-Tait herself later attempted to enter local politics, fighting a controversial by-election campaign for the Masterton District Council." It would be belpful to say whether she was successful.
:Unfortunately, I can't actually find any direct statement saying what the result was, but I believe she failed. She doesn't appear in any of the archived versions of the Masterton District Council website, and a person (David Holmes) who I know was competing against her does appear, which I suppose is probably proof enough... (although I would be happier with some sort of official announcement). I've modified the article. -- Vardion 03:03, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Well, was she successful?
Talk:Atlantic Crossing

message: Isn't it all of Booker T & the MGs, not just 3/4? The credits list Cropper, Dunn, Jackson and Jones. (Comment added 02:49, 26 February 2021‎ by John K) 
:You're correct. I've adjusted the article. SilkTork (talk) 18:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Booker T & the MGs
Talk:Western College Program

message: A large portion become lawyers? wow. I'd like to see some stats on that, not that I disbelieve it or anything. I only know one WCP grad personally who is going on to become a lawyer. --I. Neschek 02:55, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've reverted the goofy edits by 24.145.235.68 to thadk's version. I felt that 24.145.235.68's additions would be more suited to an article about Interdisciplinary Studies in general, and some of the language was, uh, goofy. Plus I didn't think that 24.145.235.68's directions to email a Hotmail account for further info were useful to the page. --—I. Neschek |  talk 23:08, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  rv goofy edits by 24.145.235.68 

message: 'Western College' redirects to Miami's wikipedia page while Western College Program redirects here. Should this happen? It seems this redirect lacks consistency. --Ryan Wise 07:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I redirected it to Western College for Women, since that's what the one article linking there was referencing. If that doesn't work for you, we could make it a disambiguation page. - EurekaLott 03:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  western college redirects
File talk:Fuero.JPG

message: Parte: It could be Cada una de las palabras de que se compone un renglón. but I have never seen this in use. Also part of speech. -- Error 03:03, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Parte

message: Razón seems another grammar term. Maybe "speech" or "sentence". -- Error 03:03, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Razón
Talk:Ultimate Kylie

message: What the hell?
Ultimate Kylie has NEVER(!) sold 7 millions!
change it, please!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.44.157.120 (talk) 11:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?!?!?!?! 
Talk:Goo (album)

message: The comment about the art in the Cover section contradicts the Myra Hindley article. I don't know enough about the Moors murders or Sonic Youth to resolve this discrepancy.  Can someone please reconcile this? — Zaui (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album cover art 

message: This page needs to be protected in some way. Vandalism has plagued it for a while.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Machu505 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: was this article written edited by Kim Gordon herself?  or her publicist? 
...because, i can't really think of another reason why two of the three paragraphs in the "Music" section are devoted specifically to the two songs Kim Gordon wrote (out of the eleven total songs on the album).  seems disproportionate.  also seems like something else.
? 2/11 of the songwriting credits = 2/3 of the article ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.103.104.103 (talk) 01:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello

message: The way the article is written suggests that Kim Gordon only wrote two of the songs, ignoring "My Friend Goo" and "Cinderella's Big Score". That should probably be cleared up. 62.205.76.225 (talk) 04:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not two but four songs by Kim Gordon
Talk:Chrome, Smoke & BBQ

message: There isn't a comma after the word "chrome", therefore it's "chrome smoke", not "chrome, smoke". 67.188.172.165 23:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chrome Smoke & BBQ
Talk:Canadian Soccer League

message: Anyone have a list of teams?  Was this the league the Edmonton Brickmen played in, for example?
 dont no, bring back the a pro csl.
The Edmonton Brickmen played in the original CSL which lasted from 1987 to 1992 and is discussed at the bottom of this page:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Soccer_League  This CSL is a different league.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.54.164 (talk) 13:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *At this edit , article Canadian Soccer League (1987 — 1992) was merged in.
*At this edit, article Canadian Soccer League (1987 — 1992) was split off. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History information

message: Would it be an idea to move this to Canadian Soccer League and put a link in at the top of the page to the Canadian Soccer League (1987-92). I'd think the majority ofpeople looking for the CSL would be looking for the new one. Just a thought. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 01:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to "Canadian Soccer League
Talk:Rancho Texicano: The Very Best of ZZ Top

message: Rancho Texicano does not mean "Texan Ranch". 
"Texicano" = Te(jano) + (Me)xicano. 
The literal meaning in English is "Tex-Mex Ranch".
189.157.141.108 14:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Texicano: 

message: I agree. Texicano, must be a portmanteau of Texan and Mexican, as the title would translate into "Texican Ranch", or as the previous post stated, "Tex-Mex Ranch".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.152.114.32 (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texicano 
Talk:Magical Trevor

message: I'm thinking we should merge the episode guide table with the lyrics somehow. Any ideas how? Oh, and those text boxes around the lyrics are not attractive. They need to go.--Ninty 08:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lyrics should be removed due to copyright. --h2g2bob 18:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Lyrics with Summaries?
Talk:Bancroft School

message: 10/17/11 -- Hi All, The discussions below are from several years ago, and they pre-date me.  I recently undertook a pretty extensive rewrite of the Bancroft School page in an attempt to make it neutral and NOT like an advertisement, but I see it's been flagged again as advertisement-like. Is there something specific I can change in order to have that flag removed? I see other independent schools that seem to have no issues. In fact, I tried to emulate those (e.g., Worcester Academy) during my rewrite.  Any advice you can offer about how to get that flag removed would be greatly appreciated. JomalleyWK (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriously, it is funny. Don't lose your perspective on this. The biggest problem with the schools business is that people are getting intense about it. It doesn't matter that much. Everybody, just keep calling 'em as you see 'em, list them in VfD if you think they should be deleted, put in your votes in VfD, give short reasons, try gently to influence others. But don't anybody kid yourselves.  A thousand stubs about non-notable schools simply doesn't matter much one way or the other. a) Deleting them all is not going to alienate valuable contributors. b) Deleting them is not a heroic act that is preventing a breach in a dyke that is holding back the North Sea. c) Including them is not going to induce rich alumni to donate to Wikimedia. d) Including them is not going to lower peoples' opinion of Wikipedia enough to matter. Almost nobody reads these articles. They just don't matter much. The only people who care about them are the people who contribute them and the people who argue about them in VfD. If you're spending too much time in VfD dealing with schools, go off and do something else. All be the same in a hundred years. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:21, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Another way to put it is to say these articles are useful to few and inconvenient to almost no one.  They might not be the most important part of Wikipedia, but nothing is gained by deleting them.  --L33tminion | (talk) 18:18, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
*This is one of the more prestigious preps, so the topic is possible, but the article is not.  I'm not sure that merely being prestigious is enough, either.  That it has high academic standing is excellent as a selling point, but not actually notable by itself.  Therefore, even though it would be possible to write an interesting article about the school, it is not probably possible to make the school stand out from other exclusive prep schools, and we don't need to be Peterson's Guide, so delete. Geogre 05:04, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Agent Brown

message: Agent Brown was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS BUT NOBODY SAID KEEP so I have left it at Talk:The Matrix as possible merge material.
Similar to Agent Johnson - very minor character in The Matrix films. Delete. Ian Pugh 05:33, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Rhodesian Ridgeback

message: DANNTRIG RHODESIAN RIDGEBACK here https://www.danntrig.co.za/ IrishLas (talk) 00:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: citation?

message: Can someone tell me whether the edits about the ridge just made by anon user make any sense and can translate it to something that *does* make sense? It almost seems as if it makes sense enough that I'm not quite prepared to revert but I can't make head nor tail (nor spine nor ridge) out of it.  Elf | Talk 06:10, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sort of like that I think -- sannse (talk) 18:49, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: signed and dated for archive purposes only - William Harris • (talk) • 09:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridge 

message: i do not know if this is true but apparently the people i got my five Rhodesian ridgeback puppies from gave me a free history book on them and it says they were used to chase lions is this true do you think? i am really curious about this wonderful dogs i also know they are like top quality dogs for big families with a lot of kids  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stallion gal (talk • contribs) 12:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you think happens to dogs that attempt to chase lions? William Harristalk 10:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The description in the article states that the dogs harried the lions but never closed to attempt biting. David notMD (talk) 11:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhodesian ridgeback history? 

message: Woof 74.70.21.81 (talk) 01:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dogs 

message: There are no bears in Southern Africa. 102.222.28.179 (talk) 15:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As written, "boars", not "bears". David notMD (talk) 11:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hunting BEARS?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Webcomics

message: Hello, i see at All of Us Are Dead page, in the infobox it says | based_on          = Now at Our School, but in Webtoon the title is "All of Us Are Dead". So which is the right one? Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 05:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like "Now at our School" is a literal translation of the Korean title of both the webtoon and series. It should not be used in this context; the English title for both is indeed "All of Us Are Dead" and that's how we should typically refer to it. We can explain the Korean title in prose. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 07:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Umm, so what should we type in that parameter? (Well, you can freely change it as i'm not actively editing that page). Thanks. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 03:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based on 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council § Determining the future of B-class checklists.  This project is being notified since it is one of the 82 WikiProjects that opted-in to support B-checklists (B1-B6) in your project banner. DFlhb (talk) 11:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: B-checklist in project template
Talk:An American Tragedy

message: According to a Rank Film Libray publication, there is a film by this title, Is it an adaptation?
ShakespeareFan00 22:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film adaptaion? 

message: Surely a plot summary needs no source.  Isn't the book itself the obvious source?  Which editor is suggesting that the plot summary should be removed it no citations are given?  That's daft.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.210.51.217 (talk) 23:45, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary
Talk:Heinrich Schliemann

message: It should be https://www.jstor.org/stable/506941 but it links to something else -bb (talk) 13:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Link to the Allen 1995 article is incorrect 

message: Is this "title" correct? As far as I can see he got a proper PhD in 1869 and started excavations after that. 91.61.234.254 (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amateur archaeologist 

message: This citation is from the legacy section - but Evans was a generation younger! 91.61.234.254 (talk) 11:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Along with Arthur Evans?" 

message: I have now invested some time in clearing this article of polemical and subjective statements and adding references. Unfortunately everything was reset and I have little desire to do the work again. What a shame! If someone is working on a revision again, the article in German would be a good source... 80.134.96.165 (talk) 13:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: "David Traill wrote that the examiners gave him his PhD on the basis of his topographical analyses of Ithaca, which were in part simply translations of another author's work or drawn from poetic descriptions by the same author."
This is something that traill wrote but it is not true. 
Several people worked with the documents in the archive of the University of Rostock and published about this PhD procedure:
Wilfried Bölke: Promotion an der Rostocker Universität. In: Bölke 1996, S. 160–168
Richter 1980a: W. Richter, „Ithaque, le Péloponnèse et Troie“ und das Promotionsverfahren Heinrich Schliemanns. In: Ethnogr. Archäol. Zeitschrift 21, 1980, S. 667-678.
Richter 1980b: W. Richter, Die „altgriechisch geschriebene Dissertation“ Heinrich Schliemanns und die Darstellung seiner Promotion im biographischen Schrifttum. In: Antikerezeption, Antikeverhältnis, Antikebegegnung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, Schriften der Winckelmann-Gesellschaft, Bd. 6, S. 671-691. 91.61.251.85 (talk) 14:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissertation
Talk:Flag of Luxembourg

message: removed reference to the French flag, incorrect statement (design is based on the Dutch flag)
:Actually neither is demonstrated. As far as I recall Loutsch believes it's indeed derived from the French revolutionary flag. Even if it were derived from the Dutch one that would be an indirect derivation as that one is a revolutionary evolution from the original orange-white-blue to the current red-white-blue. In any case, the use of red-white-blue is more logical in Luxembourg (as those were indeed the local colours for several centuries before the revolution). How the flag could be derived from the Limbourg coat of arms (red lion on white) as mentionned in the article currently is beyond me in any case.--Caranorn 11:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Wait for Me (Susan Tedeschi album)

message: * This page claims the title Wait for Me. 
* Another page claims the remarkabley similar title Wait for me. 
* There are numerable pages that could take these titles. See Wait for Me (disambiguation). 
* I suggest the page should take the title Wait for me (Susan Tedeschi Album) (distinguishing it from The Pigeon Detectives Album) and this page should redirect to the disambiguation page. Jonwood2 15:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Change Page Title
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive (places)

message: I have to cringe whenever I see a postal abbreviation (like "OR") being used in plain text in place of a perfectly good state name (line "Oregon").  It's rather ugly, IMHO.  And it's not even a particularly good set of abbreviations.  Back when they were instituted there was a US Postmaster who said "they're awful -- don't use them".  They could have used the state abbreviations from the Federal Boating Act; they're better.  Enough ranting.  Anyway, I don't know where else to put this, and I couldn't find anything in MoS about it.
Further, I've seen the phrase "Zip code", strictly an American term, used on articles about other parts of the world.  I don't think that makes much sense.  Any reason I shouldn't change these to "Postal code" on sight? ;Bear 18:59, 2004 Apr 8 (UTC)
:ZIP code would be correct for US postal codes.  "Postal code" is indeed the most commonly used designator for all of these things in general.  Postal code appears to list what they're called in various places.  And I agree about avoiding using state abbreviations. Elf | Talk 19:47, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Postal codes and postal abbreviations

message: Which is the best when writing a city name and its equivalent in another language: e.g. Namur (Dutch: Namen) or Namur (Namen in Dutch)? Thanks.
-
Edcolins 20:07, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, I'd probably do the former, just because it's shorter.  Imagine you were doing this for a city in a country with 3 official languages: Place (Lang1: blah; Lang2: foo; Lang3: lalala).  It's more compact.  I don't know if there's an entry in the manual of style for this though.  fabiform | talk 21:35, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  I concur. I've done a lot on multilingual topics, and that is the style I use, although I use commas rather than semicolons. -- Jmabel 04:53, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  City names and foreign equivalent