lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bigger, Better Power Ballads II

message: A variation of the australian version of this album is marketed as "Bigger, Better Power Ballads", i.e. without the roman numeral "II".  See http://musichead.com.au/site/artistProduct.asp?actID=22532&catalogNo=3852472 BGreeNZ (talk) 00:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bronze- and Iron-Age Poland

message: What an excellent start! I've made some tweaks for improved clarity and emphasis that should be self-explanatory. I've not intended to change any information. Some queries that might be addressed are commented out in the text. A link to the poorly-named Pre-Roman Iron Age to the west would help ties this article to artticles outside this area. --Wetman 15:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good start

message: Should this article be split into Bronze Age of Poland and Iron Age of Poland? ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 20:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason I put it together is that the main archeological culture in Poland around that time, the Lusatian culture, spans across both the Bronze and Iron ages, so in case of Poland seems more natural to lump the two together for the description purpose. Orczar (talk) 13:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split? 

message: * GA Review at Talk:Bronze- and Iron-Age Poland/GA3. Good luck! Ling.Nut (talk) 12:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Bronze- and Iron-Age Poland/GA3]]
Talk:Brand New Way, Brand New Situation

message: This album is not independently notable, and even if it was, WP:NALBUM recommends merging to the artist page when articles are unlikely to grow beyond a stub. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Breakfast in Bed (album)

message: We all look at life as it's something but nothing is going to be something at the end Niggsku41x (talk) 02:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Look
Talk:Rượu thuốc

message: Is it made from rice? Is it distilled or fermented? What is the color before adding herbs, and what is the color after? Badagnani 17:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is made from rice. It is distilled.--Bình Giang (talk) 04:11, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Production
Talk:Choir Practice

message: Would this article be better if it had a brief explanation of what a Garage Rock Band is? (FairNPOV (talk) 00:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Amazingly, explaining what a garage rock band is would be exactly why the article's infobox has a link to the phrase garage rock in it. It would be superfluous and tangential to repeat the entire definition here; that's precisely why Wikipedia articles contain links to other Wikipedia articles, so that we can avoid digressing off topic and people can just click on the link if they need more information about what the term means. Bearcat (talk) 03:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

text: User:PeacePeace sockpuppet comment striked per WP:BE, —PaleoNeonate – 23:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would this article be improved by a short explanation of Garage Rock Band?
Talk:Clic (album)

message: Battiato performed "No U-Turn" at Dublin's Button Factory on 6 March 2015 with Joe Patti's Experimental Group: . There is a video at YouTube, posted by Fernando Maglio (who has posted quite a few Battiato videos, so it seems very unlikely there is any copyright issue). There is also a live version of the song, from the 1989 album Giubbe rosse, provided to YouTube by Universal Music Group, here. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live performances
Talk:Caerwent Training Area

message: In Top Gear it was named 'Trefniadaeth Seilwaith Amddiffyn Man Hyfforddi Caerwent'. Any idea were that name came from?--Wester (talk) 19:51, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It was included in the script as one of the show's jokes.  It's most likely a verbatim translation of one of the site's official names, but unless there are citations showing that it is actually an official Welsh name for the site, it shouldn't be included in the article.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

text: in google translate it translates to something similar to Defence Infrastructure OrganisationCaerwent Training Area 86.18.249.231 (talk) 09:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trefniadaeth Seilwaith Amddiffyn Man Hyfforddi Caerwent 

message: What would your guys opinion be on renaming this page to Caerwent Barracks, since it is currently being converted into a barracks for 1Rifles/QDG? It hasn't been the Royal Navy Propellant Factory since 1966. For most of its existence, it has been the Caerwent Training Area.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolphinwaxer (talk • contribs) 08:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: OK with me, if noone else objects. Dormskirk (talk) 10:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if anybody else will reply, seems quite a dead page Dolphinwaxer (talk) 20:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of objections, I have moved it. Dormskirk (talk) 16:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Terrible idea, per WP:CRYSTAL. The article is now largely inconsistent with its own title, describing most aspects, such as the railway, in the wrong tense.  Also the barracks won't happen (at the earliest) for another 5 years – if then. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:13, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Then it should be Caerwent Training Area. It definitely should not be Royal Navy Propellant Factory.  Dolphinwaxer (talk) 10:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I am OK with Caerwent Training Area as a title. Dormskirk (talk) 11:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

text: I would accept a rename to Caerwent Training Area, so long as the former names are bolded in the lead and the text is made consistent throughout.  Changing the article title after two days notice was very bad practice.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:13, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point re the premature move of the page. Dormskirk (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential rename
Talk:Eternamiente

message: I remember Randy Talking on TV about the EPs on the website, and the online poll, please someone put a citation for that. I have limited Internet access here at work. Vicco Lizcano (talk) 17:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations for polls 

message: Only for the ones i think are a bit off:
"Eternamiente Molotov" (Eterna-lie Molotov)
"Déjate Algo" (Leave yourself Something)
"No Me Moleste Nadie" (Don't Anybody Bother Me)
"FXF (Fiel por Feo)" (Faithful for Being Ugly)
"Yase" ("(I)know")
"Por?" (Why?)
"Sentido Común" (Common Sense)"
"Guácala Q' Rico" (Yuck It's Yummy)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.115.157 (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested translations to English
Talk:Henry Antes House

message: In the article it says the house was designed and built in 1736.
In the data under the photograph, however, it says 1720.
Which is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Todd Gorman (talk • contribs) 05:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources are generally unified on 1736.  No idea where the 1720 comes from. Magic♪piano 19:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Date
Talk:Naval Nuclear Power Training Command

message: Hi, I recently tried to make an edit that was shot down. I understand why it was done, and figured I would just post the sources I have for the information I tried to change, and maybe someone seen as more trustworthy can decide if the change I made is to be believed. The Commanding Officer of Naval Nuclear Power Training Command (NNPTC) is no long Capt. Scott J. Mcginnis and is in fact Capt. James D. Anderson. Unfortunately, the official NNTPC website has been incredibly slow to update. However, the NNPTC YouTube page has posted a video of the Change of Command ceremony where the change took place on 28 April 2023. There is also an article I was able to find covering the same event. Embassyclerk (talk) 21:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating information
Talk:Gladys' Leap

message: The last album is shown as Tipplers Tales (1978)... last studio album yes; but in the interim there were some live albums - Farewell Farewell (1979) and Moat on the Ledge (1982); debatably, two others couls be included - The Airing Cupboard Tapes (1979) and AT2 (1982 or 1983). --Redrose64 (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, I was only looking at the studio albums in the NavBox. I'll fix this but at present I'm trying to fix the redlinks- Gottle O' Gear is next! Rodhullandemu 18:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A redlink. Try Gottle O'Geer, another for which I have original vinyl. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:11, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And which I have just written. Dam' typo! Rodhullandemu 10:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last album
Talk:Headphone Children

message: This song title is not incorrect.  Although the kanji says "Kyousoukyoku", it is indicated on the official site and track list that it is supposed to be read "ラプソディー"/"Rapusodii" or "Rhapsody". - ChaosAxess (talk) 00:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shanghai "Rhapsody" 
Talk:Horsebreaker Star

message: The album liner notes credit Syd Straw and Esta Hall as the only two female backing singers on the album, but for one song only -- "Put You Down." Anyone know who sings on "All Her Songs" and "Coming Up For Air" (and all the other songs with female singers)? BlackCab (TALK) 06:39, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The credits are somewhat misleading. In the CD booklet, it say "backing vocals: Syd Straw & Esta Hall (Put You Down). For anyone who knows Syd Straw's voice, it is obvious that she's also singing on "All Her Songs". It's not quite as obvious in the other songs with female bvox, but I think it's always Syd. So I think the credits are meant to mean that Syd Straw sings on the whole album while oEsta Hall only sings on "Put You Down". (As I'm writing this, I'm listening through CD2 of the album, I've reached "Keep My Word" right now, and that's definitely Syd singing) 95.33.72.228 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background vocals
Talk:I Will Be There (album)

message: The Van Morrison song I Will Be There (Van Morrison song) has the same name, this page should then be renamed I Will Be There (album). --Kitchen roll (talk) 13:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs disambiguation page 
Talk:I'll Be Lightning

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I have removed this link from the professional reviews section. If any interested editor would like to examine the contents of the review I have linked to, and finds that it is beneficial to this Wikipedia page, please reinstate the link. Thank you. *Crawdaddy! (favorable) 2008Asst. Editor, Crawdaddy! FenderRhodesScholar | Talk 23:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review suggestion
Talk:Innocent Eyes (2006 Delta Goodrem album)

message: (cur | prev) 08:17, 22 January 2014‎ User:BennySOTOTW:) you removed page Innocent Eyes (Delta Goodrem compilation album) back to Innocent Eyes (2006 album) but there is also Innocent Eyes (Graham Nash album), so the Delta Goodrem album should have "Delta Goodrem" on it. The fact that the Nash album is 1986 is irrelevant, we don't disambiguate by year. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved to Innocent Eyes (Delta Goodrem Sony Music Japan album) but Innocent Eyes (2006 Delta Goodrem album) might be better if the other was also to have the year added. The main problem here may be that this should be merged anyway. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:SONGDAB]]
Talk:Diocese of Carlisle

message: With Glyn Webster having retired as Bishop of Beverley in January this year and his bishopric apparently in interregnum (if it is vacant pending appointment of a successor) is anyone else providing AEO for Carlisle Diocese in the meantime? The same consideration goes for other dioceses of which the Bishop would have also been the PEV.Cloptonson (talk) 18:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: PEV needs updating
Category talk:Greek explorers

message: :Category:Greek people is part of a set of categories meant to sort people by the country they were part of. The problem here is that before 1821/1830 there was no Greece. After that year a lot of people in the Ottoman Empire, in Egypt and some other places think of themselves as in everyway Greeks who live outside of Greece, and some want to make where they live part of Greece. Such people are not "of Greek descent" in almost  all cases, but ethnic Greeks. We seem to lack a good way to categorize them. Since in modern usage Greek has been coopted to mean nationals of Greece, we really need a different category and structure for those who were ethnic Greeks, who identified as ethnic Greeks, but lived outside of the country of Greece. I think the best naming is "ethnic Geek". Only one of the people here is an actual suvject/citizen of the modern state of Greece, and so if used as most of these categories are it would be reduced to one entry. I think we should rename this to "ethnic Greek explorers" since that would cover a broader set of people. During much of the age of exploration where ethnic Greeks lived was primarily divided between the Ottoman Empire and the Republic of Venice. While living in those entities might be somewhat defining for the people here, I think an argument can be made that they were a group based on their ethnic unity. It is important to have categories that have clear definitions, and conflating a category meant for people based on being subjects/citizens of a particular nation with a category grouping people by ethnicity is not a good thing. The one actual subject of Greece was also ethnic Greek, and he can go here and be clearly categorized based on his connection to the Greek state with other categories.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need a different name
Talk:Independence movement

message: This page is uncommonly uninformative, even for a disambig.  "Independence movement may refer to the concept of independence"??!  —Tamfang 16:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, someone else thought so in August 2010. —Tamfang (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: er what?

message: Dont we have a list of curent independence movement somewhere? New Babylon 2 (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists perhaps
Talk:You Came Along

message: This article requires a discussion about the style and Wp:weight issues involved. FWiW  Bzuk (talk) 13:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a year since the last notice. Now is the time to revisit and re-edit the article. Due to its multiple problems, it needs lots of work. FWiW  Bzuk (talk) 17:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A single editor did a major rewrite a couple of years ago, but hasn't edited this article (or at all) since mid-2016. I would say be bold and fix the problems you can. I've updated the article assessment (provided by the same editor who did the rewrite) to reflect the article's issues. --RL0919 (talk) 17:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:The Story of Gilbert and Sullivan

message: I assessed this as Start, although it is barely a start.  There are links in the article to a couple of synopses, and if anyone has time, it would be great if someone would write a synopsis section based on these sources.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 21:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did it myself.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks Ssilvers for the good work - at least it is now a genuine "start". I have actually seen this twice on television (it is, incidentally, a VERY poor movie in several respects) and was confusing it with "Topsy Turvy" (or vice versa). I have given up editing any article on a subject like this out of respect for your esteemed blood pressure. Silly old man that I am (lol). But life's too short. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 06:37, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, and thanks to Dutchy85 for the new material!  I think it's C-class now.  If you see any more (sourced) encyclopedic info about the film, by all means, please add it!  -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:American Farm School

message: Hmmmmmm......some of the boxes at the top of the page......hmmmmmmmm.....I think the style is pretty decent myself.  Any others before I zap the "tone" box??  Buddpaul 16:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St Peter's Church, Little Budworth

message: The Vale Royal volume of the local history series [Local History Group, Latham FA (ed.). Vale Royal (The Local History Group; 1993) ()] states on p57 "There are doubts as to the chapel's exact dedication in early times and the full dedication may have been to St. Mary, St. Peter and All Saints. By 1526, however, the simple dedication to St. Peter seems confirmed." Espresso Addict (talk) 01:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting: but writing in 1816 Ormerod states "The church is dedicated to St. Mary and All Saints."  This is taken, admittedly from Helby's edition written between 1875 and 1882, but where Helsby has made alterations to Ormerod's text, he indicates it - there is no such indication here.  So that seems that this was the dedication in the early 19th century.  I don't think Latham's offering merits any amendment to the text of the article, do you? --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: One might add the statement that "another source considers the full original dedication might have been to St Mary, St Peter and All Saints", with the Latham ref, which helps to clear up where the St Peter dedication might have originated? Espresso Addict (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done; is that OK?  Do you have a place of publication of Latham's book?--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that looks good. I think the series is essentially self-published by the society so there's no place of publication as such, but the printer is given as Whitchurch, Shropshire, if that's any help. Espresso Addict (talk) 09:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine; I'll leave it as it is.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 10:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dedication
Talk:Goar of Aquitaine

message: It would be interesting to know of any Alanic connexion for Goar, considering that the Alans had a presence in Aquitaine under their king Goar. Srnec 07:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Good article! A word missing here: "The bishop called upon Goar to name of the father of the baby..."
Lupo Manaro 08:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Addressed. Thank you! Alekjds talk 13:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: a very minor one

message: This sounds like some non-encyclopedic material. "hanging his hat on a sunbeam".... come on this is not the Bible people, stuff like this has no place on Wikipedia. Max ╦╩ 14:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No one is saying this really happened (ergo, "semi-legendary account"). It's a legend about the saint, and explains why sometimes he's depicted in a certain iconographical way. Medieval vitae are full of this sort of thing, and it is certainly encyclopedic. Alekjds talk 16:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?? 

message: * Born: in 5th century
* Died: 575 , , , ...Tanja5 (talk) 11:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life Goar of Aquitaine 
Talk:List of Hawker Hunter operators

message: At https://www.google.co.nz/books/edition/Hawker_Hunter_1951_to_2007/Ih5Vcy2PZXQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Somalia+received+a+number+of+Hunters+from+Abu+Dhabi&pg=PA424&printsec=frontcover Buckshot06 (talk) 17:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed data regarding Somalia
Talk:Fleet Marine Force Combat Operation Insignia

message: This is one of the "authorized service devices" and a "Dept. of the Navy device" according to the DoD awards manual. None of the Service award manuals uses the term "award device" for any of the devices.— Preceding unsigned comment added by YahwehSaves (talk • contribs) 06:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do a simple Google search and you will see that award device is a common term used to refer to the appurtenances worn on military awards and decorations.  Look at any commercial seller of medals and that is how it is referred.  Since they are likely trying to make it so customers can find what they are looking for on their websites, why do you suppose they call them award devices? Because that is likely the common usage.  Cheers.  EricSerge (talk) 11:53, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: FMF Combat Operation Insignia

message: Is the FMFCOI authorized for the Inherent Resolve Campaign Medal? This source says yes, but I've seen nothing from DoD confirming it. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 07:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inherent Resolve Campaign Medal 

message: "FMF Combat Operation Insignia": Deliberately changing the name of the device for the article and changing the article wording should be set forth in Talk first and not act like one has both DoD and Marine Corps authorization besides Wikipedia authorization. YahwehSaves (talk) 04:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Unauthorized by who? The name change was done with a proper cite from official DOD source. The DOD is higher than the USMC on the chain of command so anything they put out supersedes it. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Secretary of the Navy for one. The source (2013) is a supplier of the FMF device. Despite how the source refers to the device (the DoD officially refers to the services for their award criteria), the DoD officially uses the same name for this device that the Navy and USMC has used for several decades. The USN and USMC does not refer to or call the device which is a miniature "Marine Corps emblem", the "FMF Combat Insignia". YahwehSaves (talk) 07:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the name of the device and article
Talk:SMART Defense Scholarship Program

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to SMART Defense Scholarship Program. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:45, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Science, Mathematics, And Research For Transformation (SMART) Defense Scholarship Program → ? – Name (acronym) titles are discouraged per Talk:222nd Broadcast Operations Detachment. This should be moved to either Science, Mathematics, And Research For Transformation Defense Scholarship Program or SMART Defense Scholarship Program. I weakly prefer the latter title as less unwieldy, but it is probably worth discussing. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:57, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 November 2022
Talk:Forward support battalion

message: This is a mess.  I think I'll take a whack at it.  MWShort (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

message: Currently reads: "With the conversion to the modular force ... "
This page needs a definition of "modular force", or link to (currently non-existent) Modular Force page.
Karl gregory jones (talk) 02:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modular Force