Talk:Sailor Moon (English adaptations)

message: I noticed there is no mention of who translated the Sailor Moon manga for Mixx/ Tokyopop. Does anybody know? (or is this not relevant enough for this article?)--VArakawa (talk) 13:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There's some copies in a store I know so I can check them. Going by how quickly SM stuff goes, I'd say an anime would sell.陣内Jinnai 01:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Manga translators?

message: I have been asking around on this and no known Sailor Moon fan can find a source to say as such, so it has come to my attention that this information is false. If DiC had indeed breached it's contract it wouldn't have been able to distribute the Sailor Moon series on DVD in 2002 with ADV. As such I have changed the post to the following: "DiC for reasons unknown did not end up dubbing the rest of the Sailor Moon series. Cloverway Inc., the international branch of Toei Animation, the Japanese studio that produced the original version of the anime, ended up with the distribution rights to Sailor Moon S and SuperS because of the show's ongoing popularity."
If anyone finds a reliable source as to the truth of DiC actually breaching it's contract I believe it needs to stay as this as there is no proof or source that they actually breached their contract and saying so is false information. JamesAlan1986 (talk-Contributes) 08:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: DiC's supposade "breach of contract"

message: They were all released in the year 2000 as says amazon.com: Sailor Moon R The Movie - Promise of the Rose: February 8, 2000, Sailor Moon S The Movie - Hearts in Ice: May 23, 2000, & Sailor Moon SuperS The Movie - Black Dream Hole: August 15, 2000. JamesAlan1986 *talk 08:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Movies were released 2 years after the dubbing of R, during the dubbing of S and before the dubbing of SuperS

message: Article has loads of specific trivia where they are not supported by souces which is considered original research not only that but it also holds more sections without barely any citation at all. And some don't even have any refs. So some of thatcan be considered original research.Lucia Black (talk) 15:54, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the template to a  - that seems more in line with what you're saying here than the OR template.  --Malkinann (talk) 19:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was also refering to OR. In which there is, such as sections related to alterations.Lucia Black (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you please be more specific?  The alterations sections are reliably sourced.  --Malkinann (talk) 11:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No they're not.Lucia Black (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Animefringe is a reliable source, and it is used to source that section.  Could you please be more specific as to what the article needs?  --Malkinann (talk) 19:25, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: The discussion can continue. I see no need to leave the tags on for years. I don't have an opinion one way or another, but leaving them on for so long just makes WP look like we don't maintain or articles in a timely fashion. I will wait a few days for responses before removing them.--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Better to leave it as it is incase multiple editors manage to find a way rather than hoping they run into the discussion.Lucia Black (talk) 11:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't read through all the discussion. Could someone put in a nutshell why the articles need to be merged. It seems like a very tedious process, information could be deleted, and links between each article could have the same effect?--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CONTENTFORK, WP:SYNTHESIS. The article separates english localization and distribution of the same media. t treats the media as if it were different, but its not.Lucia Black (talk) 03:17, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: I am removing merge tags