lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Matsuri

message: By the way the search function of www.photoguide.jp spits out the entries for matsuri.
Hence, direct linking is not strictly neccessary.
Its "about us" informs that it is a private initiative.
Talking about my own work (image gallery), i am choosy.
This means i choose one picture for each thematic.
However, extensive data streams are useful for some people.
Its a very personal question of taste.
I made ~1000 pictures but not even 50 made it to my sites.
It is not a critic or negative remark.
But, the official site has priority over any private initiative.
The search function works well, as mentioned.
Probably it is possible to narrow it to one link.
User:Akidd_dublin 20060311
 
If there is to be a list of local festivals, it would be nice to see this expanded to include many more.  -Jmh123 00:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

message: People should include anything about matsuri, as long as it is not a unrelated business advert, because it is a stub. Later, it is possible to put the link(s) to the specific article. It is also thinkable to create an external wiki, to contain a long list of internet links. In addition, i do not do serious grammar mistakes, and edits can not be done ignoring this discussion. The policy about the external links asks "is it improving the article". Matsuri is a topic which is technically split up into numerous local events. External link policy does not have self-purpose. However, it should be considered to put the links into additional matsuri articles, or to an external wiki/webiste. Is is allright to collect them here, while the article is a stub.
Searching for matsuri, wikipedia appears at top position (1st entry). Hence, wikipedia figures a public part of the internet. It is not a link directory, but people should find links to relevant sites. This could be a website containing a directory, once enough links do exist. Otherwise, applying the policy literally is contra-productive, for researching the net about how to create additional matsuri articles.
People search the net, and in several cases the 1st result is a wikipedia entry. They are not searching for individual editors. Yy-bo 12:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  extending this article, more matsuri articles, external links 

message: Matsuri a just a Japanese word for festival. Just because it happens in Japan does not mean its speical. I suggest this merging with festival. "THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!" 01:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Matsuri is a word most people do not know, unless they speak Japanese. I suggest merging it with Japanese festival, not the master festival article, since festivals in Japan are specifically Japanese. This article, though, does not serve a purpose beyond Japanese festival, in my opinion. Erk 17:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we really a separate article for "matsuri"?? 
Talk:Anarchy (Busta Rhymes album)

message: This track list is incomplete; missing two tracks.  "A Trip Out of Town" and the outro track.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowCrew (talk • contribs) 17:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Tracks 
Talk:BA-27

message: Strange, I see some kind of phobia or hysteria here. I added a decent picture showing the later version of BA-27, with details of the side of the wielded(!) hull visible. And that's when two guys come in, find a much better pic of the earlier version (bolted hull) and replace the old one with the new one instead of leaving both of them in the article. The only reason so far was stated by Irpen () as in no way this photo illustrates the subject of the article, please don't litter unrelated articles with images of Polish suffering. Now let me explain, this picture does not feature Polish suffering, at least I don't see it there. What I see is some soldiers and the side of the BA-27, with the hatch and the periscope clearly visible. If that's irrelevant to this article then hardly any picture is. Or perhaps someone wants to argue that all pictures of Soviet or German AFV's are somehow related to Polish suffering and as such should be removed? Nonsense. I'm putting the picture back unless there is some more serious reason given. Halibutt 12:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad. The picture was removed due to some hysteria or conspiracy fears, but it should indeed be removed as... I suspect the armoured car is not the BA-27 at all. It rather seems like FAI car. Halibutt 12:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your own please don't litter unrelated articles with images of Polish suffering seems instructive here. Polish suffering? Come on... Halibutt 13:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: All English sources say BA-27M was created in 1931. However Russian Wikipedia BA-27 page (via google translator) goes into great details about the vehicle history, stating it appeared in 1937. Is this bogus or what? --Kubanczyk (talk) 16:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think the Russian Wikipedia is mistaken. I checked in Kinnear's Russian Armored Cars 1930-2000, and it states 1931. In addition, this RKKA site which I believe almost always uses Russian sources also states 1931. Elfalem (talk) 09:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be a common mistake, probably originated in some old source and later thoughtlessly copied by zillions of other authors, just like with the JS-3 allegedly used in WWII. In the more recent M.Kolomiyets' Story of Russian Armored Car 1925—1945 (which is amongst most reliable sources on the subject) it is not only stated that the BA-27M was built in 1937—1938, but also a detailed production timeline is given. And i wouldn't comment on what is the better use for pretty much all English sources on Russian AFVs. --Saə (talk) 14:52, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any secondary sources? Could you please update the article (along with BA-I)? --Kubanczyk (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BA-27M created in 1937???
Talk:Unforgettable... with Love

message: The list of personnel on this album has over 200 entries, which seems a bit "excessive".  Everyone, including the copyists and the hair stylist are listed.  Seriously?  One could probably come up with a similarly long list for virtually ANY commercially successful record album, but most album entries in Wikipedia don't go to that extreme.  Neither is is necessary to list individually every single member of a a backing studio orchestra.
I suggest this list be pared-down to only essential musicians, and supporting orchestra.  We don't really need every second violin, much less every assistant engineer, stylist, linguist, and make-up artist.  This is an album of pop music, not a major motion picture or Broadway production.
A far more notable feature of this album -- not even mentioned in the article -- is that this 1991 album pioneered the concept of the "virtual duet", with Natalie singing a duet with a recording her 26-years dead father had released at the peak of his career in 1963.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.176.249 (talk) 23:04, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel
Talk:Mono

message: Everson Mono, also known as Everson Mono Unicode, is an evenly spaced Unicode font (typeface).
Is it really necessary to include that? There are plenty of Monospaced fonts with Mono in the name.
--71.172.34.48 20:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Typeface

message: A Mono is also another word for a wheelstand on a motorbike......... 121.208.57.90 (talk) 13:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wheelstand

message: I think entering mono should redirect you to Infectious mononucleosis
and move this page to Mono (disambiguation).  20:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe there is a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for disambiguating to. The residents of the various locations named 'Mono' would be dismayed, as would the ethnic groups, at the very least! Personally, I think of mono vs. stereo, whenever I read/hear the word. Proof of some sort is required, to establish primary-ness. HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect
Category talk:British service swords

message: I've set this Sub Category up to contain a few articles which are in progress on British Army swords. History, weapons and army categories seem to be all over the place, so if anyone finds other categories where this belongs assistance would be appreciated. Epeeist smudge 12:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I have searched Wikipedia for this and it appears to have removed from every related page. This is the sword in question  --Nozzer71 (talk) 18:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1828 / 1831 Pattern Highland Broadsword
Talk:Saturated calomel electrode

message: I think some of the information on this page is wrong (but I'm not an expert!). The spelling isn't great either
It seems to be in order... (BW)
Missing information: Saturated calomel electrode (SCE) is +244 mV versus the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) at 25°C
REF: D.T. Sawyer and J.L. Roberts. In: Experimental Electrochemistry for Chemists Wiley-Interscience, New York (1974), p. 42. DCAM77 (talk) 18:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

message: The half-cell notation ends with Pt. What does platinum have to do with this? 207.70.169.36 (talk) 15:00, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an inert electrode - it sources or sinks electrons but does not react. Also see Standard hydrogen electrode#Why platinum?. --Kkmurray (talk) 02:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pt?

message: The "solubility product" section is just wrong. an electrode provides one end of a full galvanic cell, ie a half cell. (or part of one). using two different E_anode and E_cathode and taking their difference to get the full EMF of a full cell makes absolutely no sense in an article about an electrode (!not a full cell!) the two half reactions need to happen each in different electrodes for the cell to work. in a full cell the calomel electrode would work either as anode or cathode, but not both at the same time. What is the full cell this section refers to? i dont know, but at some point E_cell is taken to be zero "at equilibrium". that is just gibberish camouflaged as nernst equations.
The following section makes sense, and the actual half cell reaction taking place in the electrode is used. i recommend keeping that section and discarding the other one 2803:9800:9504:7B33:F99C:D870:9B01:3FE3 (talk) 04:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  an electrode is half a cell
Talk:So Far (Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young album)

message: There are at least two albums with the same name. Another one is by Martin Solveig and another by Crosby, Stills & Nash (and Young). Currently the article informs only about the CSN album, leaving out Martin Solveig's album. Therefore I suggest that this article should be moved under So Far (album by CSN), and a new article So Far (album by Martin Solveig) should be created (or something along those lines). - Gwydda (talk) 20:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sharing names
Talk:Samarkand manuscript

message: I highly doubt the neutrality of the Samarkand_manuscript article. There have been two significant claims made to the origin of the Samarkand manuscript. I believe that both claims are well substantiated. Muslim sources (and some independent sources such as UNESCO), after research, place the date of the manuscript in the 7th century CE at the time of Othman, but according to work done by 'A. Jeffery and I. Mendelsohn' in 'The Orthography of the Samarkand Codex', the date is placed 'early in the third Islamic century'. However, as per the current state of the article, the 7th century CE claim is seemingly being rejected, and more importance is being given to the 'A. Jeffery and I. Mendelsohn' claim.
And, I had ordered the references\citations as per their chronological mention in the article. But the article has since been edited to indicate the 'The orthography of the Samarkand Codex' reference to be listed first, and also an external link to that page has been added within the article to the 'The Orthography of the Samarkand Codex', as well as a a specific link to 'The Orthography of the Samarkand Codex' in the 'References' section.
I personally have no problem in listing the 'A Jeffery and I. Mendelsohn' claim in the article, and in fact feel that it is vital that we do include that claim to give a more round point of view, but I feel that it should be done in a more neutral way. --Jibran1 02:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality?
Talk:Martin Millar

message: 1956 (top) or 1959 (cat)? Anyone know? Steve-Ho 11:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of Birth? 

message: I'm trying to expand this - have added details on the books, date of publishing and ISBN, a few additions, and some more info on his style. I think there should be much more on Thraxas, and possibly on the Lux novels as they form distinct groups of work  --Duncan 15:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions 
Talk:Ivor Cutler

message: I converted the image to a lk to the image page, on copyright grounds. I'm not versed on this issue, but on its face the text on the image page states that the basis for fair use is to show the album. In this article, it would be disingenuous to claim that purpose: the bio wants a photo of its subject, and obviously that is why that album's image was chosen for inclusion.  So the image being used says it can't be used here.  Maybe what it says at the image isn't completely authoritative, but the cure for that is more info at the image, not simply using it w/o stating the justification for doing so. --Jerzy•t 17:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite right. I found another quite good image on the BBC website which I replaced it with. Well done. --Guinnog 17:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record-cover image 

message: The Telegraph obituary says:
"Between 1979 and 1988 he had 14 plays produced on Radio Three; most of their titles included his own name, for example Ivor Cutler & His Dad; Ivor Cutler & the Mermaid; and A Sheet Metal Worker is Approached by Ivor Cutler. 
...
In 1980 he received the Pye Radio Award for Humour. In 1994 A Stuggy Pren, considered by some to be Cutler's masterpiece, was produced on Radio Three."
This isn't covered in the article yet. -- Beardo 05:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio plays 

message: Of what did he die? Drutt (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: HE HAD A STROKE. He died a week after that. I know. I was there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.139.89 (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: This links to content which violates the copyright of others, contrary to Wikipedia policy.  I suggest the link should be removed. Mockingfaces (talk) 14:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to Complete 1969 Peel Session in MP3 to download 

message: This article uses British English, in which "humorist" is the correct spelling. It seems to be a belief among some Wikipedia editors that "humourist" is a correct spelling or even that Cutler preferred this spelling. I know his work fairly well and I do not recall this supposed preference, but I am prepared to be amazed. In the absence of such amazement, I propose to use the normal spelling of the word on this article. --John (talk) 23:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Is this Flickr image here available? Alternatively, what about this one or this one?  Martinevans123 (talk) 22:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any better lead image?
Talk:Radclyffe

message: Okay, I just finished creating this article.  Obviously, it still needs a lot of work, clean-up, etc... Suggestions would be most welcome!  I'm thinking about putting in the praises Radclyffe's received, and could someone write a small synopsis about each book to put in a different page and link it with this one? :) Raystorm 12:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Birth name?--DO11.10 02:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She doesn't say. :-P Raystorm   (¿Sí?) 17:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When will Radclyffe be writing any new books, like adding to  the Provence Town series etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.65.248.113 (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is for improving the article, only. Go ask her publisher. -- Jibal (talk) 08:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Books 

message: Hi, I'm new to Wiki, but attempting to make some updates here. Apologies if I make mistakes.. still learning. I have an endorsed, recent image of Rad that I will attempt to add next time. Wicked44 (talk) 04:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2015 Updates
Talk:Looking Forward

message: The fair use rationale for :Image:CSNYlookingforward.jpg has been added to this item. 11:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair rationale added
Talk:The Very Best of Dokken

message: This entire article is taken almost verbatim from Bret Adams' review at allmusic.com (http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:g04gtq4z9u45).  Grounds for deletion, isn't it? --75.44.13.205 19:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:CESIL

message: I wrote the version of CESIL that Paul used and will contribute to these pages in due course after learning a bit more about protocol and formatting.  Tony --Yapton (talk) 11:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compiler 

message: What does "It is rather difficult to define it as high or low level" mean? --Fang Aili 19:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The accumulator based nature and limited instructions really place it as low level, though the print insructions for numbers and text are clearly not low level. Functionally, it is on a level with assembler (actually weaker than most assemblers), with a couple of subroutines and macros to do the printing. Ace of Risk 21:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context please

message: What was the name of the standard book we all used for it?
:I can't help with the standard book, but the Reference Card is currently online at http://iclces.uk/articles/icl_cesil_basic_reference_card.html if that helps. WyrmUK 13:33, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books 

message: I was taught Cesil in the UK in the 1970s as part of a new O-level curriculum on computer science for teenagers. It's not that obscure of a language as tens of thousands of kids were taught programming via this language. Rhodydog (talk) 20:20, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK HIgh School Teaching
Talk:Qadi Baydawi

message: Style to be update - as the contents are written in a style in vogue about 100 years before. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tagged it with . I dot know enough about the topic to be sure, but it probably should be , given its comments about orthodox Muslims and accuracy. David Brooks 14:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Blaze of Glory (Jon Bon Jovi album)

message: See Talk:Blaze of Glory (disambiguation). This article is long overdue to be moved; since no objection was raised since 2007, it seems pretty uncontroversial. I will do the swap soon, making the dab page primary. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 23:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Just wanted to check if it was ok to add the genre of Glam Metal to this album and songs. The album is included in the book "Nothin' But a Good Time: The Spectacular Rise and Fall of Glam Metal" by Justin Quirke on pages 187-188. Thanks! AgentKozak (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the genre of Glam Metal to this album and songs
Talk:Gerald Ronson

message: The style of this article seems unduly negative and not WP:NPOV. Ronson is well known as a businessman and a philanthropis. He was knighted (made a 'Sir', UK) in the last few days and was a well-known businessman long before he received a criminal conviction. That conviction, which itself was over 30 years ago old (this means that in the UK it is long 'spent; i.e. reporting and/or use of knowledge of the conviction are limited under civil law), led to him doing his time in prison (6 months) then getting on with a productive and charitable life. Some sentences in the article seem wrong to me; e.g. he got a CBE (a UK decoration) "notwithstanding" his offences. In my opinion, the first paragraph in particular is too judgemental and makes his conviction too prominent. I think I will edit it a little bit. I am leaving this comment as advised by other Wikipedians before I actually do any edits. Charlie Campbell 28 (talk) 22:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've edited after putting my thoughts above. Charlie Campbell 28 (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  - As a drive-by comment, I think your edits are very fair. His conviction should be in the lead, but so should his CBE in 2012 and his knighthood in 2024. They are highly notable, not least because you have to do quite a lot of good stuff to pick up two gongs after a criminal conviction for fraud. KJP1 (talk) 12:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks @KJP1. Charlie Campbell 28 (talk) 22:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Style
Talk:Beast of the Earth

message: That they are the beast is just one of several possibilities that have been suggested, and I'm not sure they're the most common one.  Will work on this later. Шизомби (talk) 03:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yajuj Majuj 

message: Does anyone have an issue with merging Dabbe into this, given that they're talking about the same thing? Dragoon17 (talk) 18:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Different thing.Editor2020 (talk) 21:39, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Piss 12.190.236.22 (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piss
Talk:Dallan

message: I haven't expanded this page, because I don't know any more about St. Dallan than what is written here.  What I have done is to alter it, as it gave the misleading impression that the Irish (Gaelic) word "dall," meaning "blind," came from the name of the saint, rather than the other way round.  
"Dall" is the ordinary Gaelic word for blind.  According to MacBain's "Etymological Dictionary of Scottish Gaelic," it is related to the Welsh "dall" (pronounced differently) and the English "dull" (with an obvious shift in meaning there).
"Dallan" literally means "a blind man."  The feminine form would be "Dallag."  Neither of these forms is in common use with this meaning - at least, not in Scottish Gaelic.  "Dallag" is one of the words we use in Scottish Gaelic for a mole.
Cailean Macleòid, 1st September 2006
—
This page is a mess.  I added a couple of notes on Dallan Forgaill's poetry, but that's not enough.  Either this become a disambiguation page and a page on Dallan Forgaill is created, or we get rid of the irrelevant items and make this a page on Dallan Forgaill. MaryJones 05:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Darqawiyya

message: How can the writer of the article possibly say that the Darqarwi order has received little attention from the west?  Suely he/she is not aware of the letters of Sheikh Darqarwi tranlsted by Titus Burckhard and then later by the Murabitun movement, the tranlation of Meaning of Man by Sidi Ali al-Jamal by the same movement, the biography of ibn Ajiba the 'basic research' by the same author and other works.
Agreed, and in fact, Sheikh Nuh Ha Mim Keller has recorded the complete letters with English translation and commentary.  In addition, I have attended the hadarah in Jordan, as well as Darqawi gatherings in Fez and have never seen or heard musical instruments.  They are in fact haram, and there is no indication in any books that I have read, including Sheikh Alawi's in which there is any mention of musical instruments.  I have also attended the Shadhili gatherings in the Husseini Mosque of Cairo, and again, no musical instruments, not even the duff.  Sheikh Nuh has stated that musical instruments is not part of Shadhili gatherings.  and Allah knows best.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.5.248.43 (talk) 08:00, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled