Talk:Manuel P. Asensio

message: IMO the article is very short, it appears to be a single view on the person, it talks about his earning a reputation, but not what that reputation is.  But it does imply that view held by the anonymous editor is possibly accurate.  Keep in mind these are just my impressions and that I am in no means perfect, there may be a better template to describe the article.  I found this page working orphans and realized needs something, but I don't know how to fix it. Jeepday 15:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the most appropriate template to use here is the  one, which is already placed here. There is a lot missing in this stub, but if you don't mind, I'll remove the  tag, as it doesn't seem to apply here. Owen× ☎ 16:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Story

message: We're getting a lot of IP edits removing the text on regulatory sanctions. I'd request whoever is doing this, particularly if connected to the subject of the article, to please register and explain on this page if there is anything wrong with the text on regulatory sanctions. Please cite reliable sources, which in this case would include Asensio's website. BLP requires that we treat such things carefully, though in this case what is removed is directly from the public record.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 23:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: IP edits

message: Note that most of the citations to asensio.com are actually copies of RS news articles rather than first-party citations, and should not be automatically dismissed out of hand. Stifle (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What purport to be copies of reliable sources are not Reliable Sources when posted on the subject's own website; least of all in this era of Photoshop and the like. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 17:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I also suspect a WP:COPYVIO issue, as the customary "reprinted with permission" disclaimer is not evident.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All true. I've unfortunately been involved in an incident where a person kept copies of newspaper and magazine articles on his web site that were altered to make it look like there was coverage that didn't actually exist, this wasn't brought to light until an AfD for the article. In addition, WP:COPYLINK states that it is against policy to link to a web site that is breaking copyright laws. -- Atama頭 00:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed, and also added a section on his shorting. I'd dearly love if other editors could please step up to the plate.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 20:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations to asensio.com 

message: The article needs to be expanded so that it does not give undue weight to regulatory actions. I presume that's why it's tagged that way. It's pretty obvious. I think the problem is that, going back through the history, it's been a kind of slo-mo tug of war between IPs and SPAs adding puffery and oversighted libel. I commend OwenX for his patience as he oversaw this article for a period of years without outside help. Sources can be obtained from Google News, mainly New York Times articles, and there is Asensio's book and website, but strictly for noncontroversial, biographical details. I notice that there are reports in the media of lawsuits. These are old and need to be treated cautiously because I presume most have since been settled/dismissed.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done!  Your added section is well written, and gives a good sense of both the nature and the scope of Asensio's operations. Owen× ☎ 12:16, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Hopefully this article will now drift off into the somnolent state of most Wiki articles.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 20:56, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion and undue weight

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Manuel P. Asensio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707172950/http://www.asensioexposed.com/readingroom.htm to http://asensioexposed.com/readingroom.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified