Talk:Queen for a Day

message: The article fails to cite it's sources and also contains opinion that should be sourced to someone notable or removed.
--Cab88 08:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be this guy http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0193319/ about whom I know nothing else. Someone up to writing an article? Snezzy (talk) 15:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing source and opinion in article 

message: :Image:Queen for a Day.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 11:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Queen for a Day.jpg

message: First, the winner would usually receive something she or a family member badly needed -- such as a hearing aid or refrigerator. There might have been other prizes, but the intent was to actually help the person with their specific need.
Second, my understanding is that the show went off the air because, as the years passed, peoples' problems became increasingly terrible, to the point where the idea that the losers left without any meaningful assistance seemed, at the least, callous.
Regardless, this article strikes me as a rather shallow. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 14:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: important points overlooked

message: 22:23, 16 September 2009 user:Kennpear added this material:
:In researching material for a personal short story titled Queen for a Day I found my way to this Wiki-page. In the late '50s, my mother actually applied to Queen For A Day. She had to go to LA, for an interview, regarding my little brother’s heart condition. He was born with a small hole in his heart and given a short time to live, subsequent to the hole growing as his body grew. At 11 years , his condition was becoming critical, and the risky operation was too much of a challenge for military surgeons to attempt and too expensive to afford civilian doctors. While she was passed through on the initial interview, it came down to her and one other woman; the other woman’s son also needed expensive surgery, but his chances of surviving the surgery were much greater than my brother’s , so the other woman was selected for the show, and my mother went home to wait for her 11-year old to die; he did so, within the year.
I moved it here to the talk page. Jim.henderson (talk) 03:07, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from front page 

message: In the summary box, it shows that Jack Bailey did not become host until 1956.  However, in the history section the article states that a few months after April 1945 the show moved to Hollywood with Jack Bailey as host.  Clearly these two items are contradictory.  It appears the box is correct and not the text, since the UCLA film archive shows that Ken Murray hosted the earliest preserved television episode, that of August 21, 1953.  Also, it would appear that the 1951 film spoof of the show starring Jack Bailey as the host was produced long before Jack Bailey became the actual host of the television program.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.231.249.141 (talk) 18:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incosistency in the article regarding hosts 

message: Mark Evanier has it right.  The opening of the Jerry Springer show boasts that Springer was "voted the worst show in the history of television" which proves that the voters had never seen Queen for a Day.
Paul (talk) 09:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  worst in history 

message: Does anyone know why Queen for a Day is associated with a proffer session with prosecutors?WhoresNwhiskey (talk) 18:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at this: http://www.wisenberglaw.com/Articles/Queen-For-A-Day-The-Dangerous-Game-of-Proffers-Proffer-Agreements-and-Proffer-Letters.shtml Siberian Husky (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proffer session