lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yantarny, Kaliningrad Oblast

message: What is the difference of small East Prussian town Palmnicken in the times of Prussia, German Empire, Weimar Republic, and National Socialist Germany (The Third Reich) that it had to be specially mentioned to be town inside Nazi Germany? I think the town was the same all the time.
The editors should pay much more attention to Amber industry developed around Palmnicken, than mention of the National Socialist adminstration 1933 - 1945.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.115.162 (talk) 16:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Palmnicken

message: Stantien & Becker ist established in 1858 and finished in 1899 (Selling to Prussia; new name: "Staatliche Bernsteinwerke" ( as much as "governmental amberfactory"). The first open pit amber mine was established by Stantien & Becker in 1870 (not 1827; Stantien was born in 1817 and Becker in 1830!) (see i.a. Adolf Brekenfeld: Die Unternehmerpersönlichkeit Friedrich Wilhelm Stantien und Moritz Becker. In: Bernstein - Tränen der Götter. Bochum 1996, . -- Hl1948 (talk) 21:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stantien & Becker 

message: The first paragraph of the section on the Palmnicken Massacre should be footnoted as to sources.
Native speakers of Slavic languages who author articles on English Wikipedia should remember that English requires frequent use of the article the before nouns — but not all of them!  I also found several misspellings and missing prepositions. Sca (talk) 16:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Two notes

message: The massacre of Stutthof subcamp inmates at Palmnicken was carried out on 31 January 1945, the day following the sinking of the MV Wilhelm Gustloff in the Baltic Sea with heavy loss of life, particularly civilian casualties. Are there sources confirming that the SS staff executed the massacre at the Palmnicken shore as a reprisal act? -- Deborahjay (talk) 11:47, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reprisal?
Talk:Kahootz

message: this shouldnt be deleted! there are a lot of other software pages and they arent put up for deletion. User:Binh Phan 13:23 April 02, 2006
:Agreed, there is ample evidence (dead link, new domain owner) that this is a legitimate program. -Elmer Clark 03:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have reverted the blatant WP:COATRACK overwriting of the previous software topic with information about the new domain user. If the new domain user is notable (with multiple independent reliable sources), it should be covered under its own disambiguated page title. GermanJoe (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:COATRACK]] overwritten content , COI-editing 

message: I got really confused because I was trying to Google search Kahootz which from my understanding is an online collaboration software and the Wikipedia description for this Kahootz came up. I tried to edit it but Wiki didn't accept the changes? User:carilloj 16:54 May 31, 2019
:We generally do not write about two separate companies on a single page. If the new software meets our inclusion criteria you'd have to start a new article on it. This one is for the older company. - MrOllie (talk) 16:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that makes sense when I get some time I may start a new page for them. Just out of interest how will the URL turn out if they both have the same name? Surely it wont be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahootz again right? Carilloj (talk) 13:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2
Category talk:Olympics templates

message: What is the point of categorizing templates using ? The part after the pipe is just for sorting, but the default sort order is based on the page names; the "Template:" has no effect because it is on all the templates.
:The "Template" will cause allpages to sort into "t" and using  circumvents that. Circeus 03:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki>
Talk:Yahwism

message: While I agree that NOVA itself is not WP:RS, mainstream Bible professors speaking at NOVA are. The difference is subtle. tgeorgescu (talk)  06:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As someone who has been on TV "documentaries" multiple times, I sure would not like the broadcast clips to be taken as a reliable source of my opinions. That's not how they work. Although NOVA is better than most, it would still be much better to quote writings of said professors. And if there are no such writings you should doubt the expertise of the professors on the subject. Zerotalk 06:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  If the opinion is itself reliable, then there will be reliable sources. Achar Sva (talk) 07:17, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOVA 

message: This thread is about sourcing for the following sentence: " Yahweh, however, was not the 'original' god of Israel; it is El, the head of the Canaanite pantheon, whose name forms the basis of the name "Israel"..."  The source is Smith, "The Early History of God" (2002), page 32. That page begins: "The original god of Israel was El." (Note the absence of a capital for god). If El was the original god of Israel then it follows that Yahweh was not. Skipping the next sentence, then third says: "[...]the name of Israel is not a Yahwistic name [meaning not a name formed on the divine name Yahweh], but an El name [one formed on the name El], with the element 'el". So far as I can see, that supports our sentence. Achar Sva (talk) 23:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The article Israel (name) also specifies that the name derives from El, with the probable meaning being ""El fights/struggles" ". Dimadick (talk) 03:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a troubling lack of attention to the fusion of northern and southern Canaanite polytheistic traditions in this article.  Mistamystery (talk) Mistamystery (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yahweh the original god of Israel 

message: this has been discussed numerous times. Most recently "Article balance" and several other places on current on this talk page and in the archive. Why should your attempt to redefine the article be treated differently?--Ermenrich (talk) 16:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redefinition by Szirtyu 

message: The statement uses WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. You might not like it, but that does not mean it's not compliant with WP:NPOV. tgeorgescu (talk)  11:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert
Talk:The Blue Bird (1976 film)

message: It's a pity for the article, that it lacks even a plot description, containing only a bunch of unsourced and biased statements on its production surroundings. Even if these statements are true, they should be clarified, i. e. for example, critics should be specified explicitly, instead of saying abstractly, that "it was widely panned by critics". Cmapm 23:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it better now? Did you help improve the article herein? -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:38, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Sapa Inca

message: It’s Saba Inca and only the American Indian(Aboriginals, the copper colored race wear our nation’s title. Mexicans are not us and no other nation. We were already here when all invaders came. And it’s a disgrace to attach African to our title Americans. We honor who we are, can’t say the same for you all. But the day of reckoning is on the way. You all are the abomination that will cause the earth to be desolate. And you will be no more when we come back. 2601:249:4001:8DD0:1C32:E701:4EEA:9607 (talk) 22:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Truth  

message: The ref looks like its attached to the Sapa Inca template Danial Bass (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref probably needs a fix
Talk:Laffit Alejandro Pincay, Jr.

message: I think there should be more biogrpahical information, especially the tragic suicide of his wife, Linda Radkovich Pincay.T.E. Goodwin 03:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can somebody who understands "c-spining" insert an explanation?  Trekphiler 20:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?
Talk:Seabiscuit: An American Legend

message: "Then the action really starts" "She uses great detail making you feel like you are sitting in the jockey's position during a race"
Are you kidding me? This is an encyclopaedia not a book club- I'd edit the article myself 'cept I live on a campus with a shared IP address that is constantly blocked from editing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.32.8 (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is truly amazing
Talk:Al-Dana (vessel)

message: Don't we usually file articles on shipwrecks under the name of the ship, which in this case would be al-Dana? For a couple of recent examples see Queen of the North and M/V al-Salam Boccaccio 98. — Trilobite 03:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I can't make any sense of your response. To restate my original point, if you have a look at :Category:Shipwrecks and its subcategories you'll see that the majority of articles on sinkings and the like are given the name of the ship. I was wondering why this was an exception. — Trilobite 21:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Times Beach, Missouri

message: Could someone please find out the zipcode used for Times Beach until it was disincorporated? 71.234.63.28 04:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: USPS currently has Times Beach listed under Eureka's zip code, 63025.  Due to the relatively small population of that area, I imagine that's what it's always been.  Mcavic (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Zip Code?

message: CERCLA/Superfund was passed in 1980, so I'm not sure how this disaster, several years later, could have led to its creation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.102.208 (talk) 02:58, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 
:Took that out. --24.255.184.103 (talk) 00:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Superfund's early years were a bit of a disaster thanks in part to Annie Gorsuch who was Reagan's choice as EPA administrator.  The Superfund reauthorization (1986) put some teeth in place: Gorsuch (IMO monumentally incompetent) had been replaced by Ruckelshaus - Nixon's first EPA administrator who in fact cared about the environment - and Times Beach was certainly in the minds of those who finally got Superfund to work as planned. 16:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Superfund?

message: I remember seeing on HBO or some other cable channel a while back, a certain movie about a group of people, who at one point in the film, decide to take a road trip across the country.  At one point in the film, they happen to stop at Times Beach, with the movie focusing on the near-abandoned state of the city.  I remember the film showing a scene with a graffito scrawled on the side of a house (or on the sidewalk, I don't exactly recall) stating "Goodbye, Times Bitch".  Anyone recall which movie this is? (I've done some searches on IMDB & filminamerica.com, but no luck...) misternuvistor 20:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Times Beach featured in movie...?

message: The recent East Palestine Ohio is easily the largest dioxin contamination event 96.253.74.92 (talk) 15:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Dioxins are certainly a potential by product of vinyl chloride combustion but I have not seen evidence that significant levels of dioxins were in fact detected in the analysis of soil and groundwater from that site.  Cross Reference (talk) 16:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I should have said 'confirmed' evidence.  There have been preliminary reports but I am not sure that USEPA or Ohio EPA have confirmed them.  Cross Reference (talk) 16:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer the largest Dioxin contamination in the USA
Talk:Land of the Pharaohs

message: An important plot element is a mechanical device for sealing the pyramid that was actually used by an obscure pharaoh named Khenjer, based on the Egyptians' method of situating enormous stones in their appropriate places. Khufu's pyramid did not use it, and Khenjer's was looted despite most of the passages being sealed with solid rock. In some movie versions the king is called Khufu and in others Khenjer.--Calypsoparakeet 21:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Device 
Talk:Orto botanico di Palermo

message: I am currently in the process of doing a complete translation of the original Italian (which is a very good article).  You can find out its present status here:  User:Pippu d'angelo/Translations - please feel welcome to contribute any time.  I may transfer completed sections across in dribs and drabs, depending on how it's going.  Salutamu.  ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 03:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Sessions

message: "Like that previous studio album, Devils & Dust, The Seeger Sessions was released exclusively on the DualDisc format, with the exception of a limited Vinyl release."
This is quite simply not true. Amazon.com and other internet-stores list a CD/DVD and a DualDisc version, and I bought my own copy (a CD/DVD and not a DualDisc) in Holland, where the DualDisc is actually quite hard to find. I have thus removed this phrase.
82.176.194.151 18:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well then change the article accordingly.   Wasted Time R 00:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Information 

message: The selling count needs updating from the June figures. Long past Gold, should be nearing Platinum now no ?
└ VodkaJazz / talk ┐ 22:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone just updated the discography article to say sales are at 550,000, so I added that here to.  A long way from platinum....   Wasted Time R 00:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Update 

message: This is not a huge issue, but: 
The article says this album "contains his interpretation of thirteen folk music songs written or made popular by activist folk musician Pete Seeger."  However, scrolling down to the songlist we see that just one song (Bring 'Em Home) is credited to Seeger, and it was added in a later release. I assume that all the rest meet the test of "made popular by" Seeger, but if not, then obviously that would need a change.  I think this is a great album and understand these pages are a labor of love, just wanted to flag what I noticed in case anyone thought it needed adjustment.  Peace, out.
GW67.164.133.118 (talk) 03:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seeger authorship
Talk:First Name: Carmen

message: The source is the film. This is an article about a film. The plot summary does not offer opinions or analysis. Seems like someone took the time to write a detailed yet not overly long plot summary. The Terminator's plot section for example has no sources or citations. This seems like a silly nitpick/doesn't make sense. Maybe that needs to be removed. 74.90.243.7 (talk) 01:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am new to this, so maybe I am missing something but why does a plot summary need citations?
Talk:Nubian station

message: Does anyone have any current pictures of the bus station at Dudley?  Foxmulder 04:15, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image request

message: It would be nice if this article listed the approximate or exact date when the last streetcar service ran to Dudley Station, and when the tracks for the El were disassembled and the new bus station was built.  JNW2 (talk) 17:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ending dates

message: The section that claims the Old Dudley Station was "torn down" really does need correcting.
In fact, major portions of historic station still exist, having been lowered to street level and repurposed as a bus terminal -- one that in fact is still oriented north-south, quite close to, if not in the same place as the original elevated platform.
reference: http://www.valleyadvocate.com/blogs/home.cfm?aid=5613  --72.72.40.35 (talk) 04:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic Station reuse 
Talk:Mike Novick

message: Quoting from the article, 
:Mike Novick has the third longest period of absence for a character on 24. His jump from the finale of Season 2 to the 17th hour of Season 4 mark a total of 40 hours of Absence.
Where does this intel come from? I can remember only one longer absence -- Mandy, with 44 hours of absence if I remember correctly. Heck, now even Kim has a relatively long absence (35 hours). So.. who's the other? --Ludoviko 23:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mandy had two...season 1 to the season 2 finale and then to near the end of season 4 71.146.53.205 03:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...Mandy's impressive!! Two "disappearances"... thanks guys. Ludoviko 18:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absence 

message: Excuse me, but since when are primary sources insufficient as sources of information? ZPrimary sources are THWE MOST RELIABLE SOURCES for information you can get, wespecially since this is a television program. I Think the people who wrote it and the show itself are the best possible places to get information realting to this TV show, rather than speculative and largely left-in-the-dark publications. For example, the media claimed knowledge of a leak that Jack Bauer was gonig to die in season 6, clearly this is not true. Hence, relying on third-party sources is a grave mistake if accuracy is the objective.
:Hello anon. If purely in-universe articles were acceptable for Wikipedia, actual TV episodes would be the best sources. Think of the requirement as a check of notability. If something is significant enough that secondary sources have talked about it, put it on Wikipedia. If something is only significant to 24 fans (like this entire article), keep it off this wiki and use Wiki 24. Connor Behan (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary Sources 

message: needs more pictures its a bit naff without Foxley of Grim 14:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: Keep this article as it is.  Mike Novick was a major character for four seasons of “24.”  As he is still alive, he can also return.  This merging madness has run amok. --MiB-24 (talk) 06:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Helpful comment. No personal attacks - it's one of the five pillars of Wikipedia. Let's stay focused on the article, not the editors. B.Wind (talk) 04:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Sheek Louch

message: Sheek's the underdog of The L.O.X. but he's no pushover at all.  He even manages to steal the show sometimes, such as songs like "Fuck You" and "Mighty D-Block (2 Guns Up)".  I met him around the time his first album came out, cool guy.--Tainted Drifter 07:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hmm

message: It certainly looks very non-neutral to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.248.5 (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this meet the standard for "written like an advertisement"? 

message: I think this article was written by Sheek Louch's hype man! Read:
Very few rappers embody the true essence of hardcore hip-hop the way Sheek Louch does so effortlessly. “I’m in the best shape of my life,” he says confidently. “Stronger, faster, like, ‘Bionic Man’!” Having earned his stripes as 1/3 of The LOX, as well as a proven solo artist, the Yonkers-native is respected as one of the best to ever do it when it comes to consistently making quality, street-approved music.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.62.246.71 (talk) 19:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is hilarious 

message: This is written as an advertisement for Sheek Louch, and lacks any sense of neutrality.  It is an opinion piece that violates Wikipedia's terms of use.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.11.46.125 (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a full rewrite 

message: This is completely biased, promotional gibberish. He 'learned to grind watching his mother work hard to earn a masters degree' isn't even correct English. Good luck to whoever decides to destroy and rebuild this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.198.3 (talk) 13:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yep, this page is hilarious 

message: Support split - Discography section takes up close to one half of the page, and should be split to a new article entitled Sheek Louch discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheek Louch discography
Talk:C-Murder

message: The bit on his arrest resulting from lyrics has not been referenced.  Also, there are capitalization problems within the article.GoAirForce 19:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup and reference 

message: There have been several claims across the Internet that C-Murder has been found dead in his prison cell. Several different dates have been reported including 30th May 2015 and 22nd January 2015. No major media outlet has confirmed his death.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.217.90 (talk) 01:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Claims 
Talk:Silkk the Shocker

message: Silkk The Shocker → Silkk the Shocker — per WP:MOSCAP, the should be lowercase because it's an article — DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 21:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Ill Will Records

message: Ill Will is a common English locution denoting an emotional disposition expressed as malign behavior. The behavior my be repressed and subtle, easily misinterpreted or unrecognized by a casual observer. At its most pronounced, it would encompass the most horrific collective behavior imaginable (genocide; the Holocaust). At the other extreme, the passive Schadenfreude indulged by tabloid readers eager to imbibe the latest celebrity misfortune.
 
Ill Will subsumes a vast so~cial psychological territory and is worthy of deeply considered dialogue in these pages.Thomas Patton (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Tarasankar Bandyopadhyay

message: This article needs to be Wikified. Please help by bringing this article upto the Wikipedia standard. Priyatu 04:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs to be Wikified - please help

message: The bibliography section needs to be revised. Most of the pages do not exist. So, IMO, there is meaning to add external page links there. --Titodutta (talk) 11:05, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bibliography Section Needs To Be Revised 
Talk:Pepper-spray projectile

message: "Although generally considered non-lethal, deaths have occurred."
Then I guess it's not "non-lethal", is it?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.110.196.19 (talk • contribs) 
No actually the US government has began calling them Less-than-lethal weapons instead.
On a different note, I edited the page to remove editorial comments following the references. I am including the removed comment here both as a record of it and as a talking point about whether its contents bear inclusion into the main article. "EDIT: The incident involving Victoria Snelgrove was NOT a PepperBall. The weapon fired into the crowd was a FN-303 less-lethal device. The devices are completely different from one another. The FN-303 uses a fin stabilized round that is weighted by a bismuth product and usually contains some sort of less lethal payload behind it, such as OC, CN, and CS. It is due to incorrect information such as listed above that leads to bad media towards some less lethal products such as PepperBall. In fact, since its inception, PepperBall use has not been directly related to any deaths. It tends to be exceptionally safe, and if used properly, very effective." Scienda (talk) 05:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

message: Per WP:PROPORTION, I believe the paragraph would better fit in a separate section on the projectile’s history. By itself it’s giving undue prominence to recent events. – XYZt (talk  |  contribs) – 04:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed paragraph on its use during George Floyd protests