Talk:Nuneaton Borough F.C.

message: Nuneaton Town's nickname is the Boro, The Nun's is the nickname of the town's Rugby team.
There ought to be some clarification in the section discussing the F.A. Cup tie with Middlesbrough F.C.  "Boro"
is also the nickname of Middlesbrough, and for many readers it may not be immediately clear that the use of
"Boro" is not a reference to Middlesbrough. Strangelights (talk) 03:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname

message: This is the second time I have removed Coventry City from the list of rival clubs, so I guess I should explain my reasoning. The two teams, while very close geographically, are vastly seperated in terms of quality and league standing (OK the first might be debatable, but we can agree on the latter). I do not believe the two teams have ever played each other, surely a prerequisite for a rivalry one would have thought. Also, for what it's worth, many people, myself included, quite comfortably follow both clubs, something which couldn't be said if they were rivals (you don't get many people following Liverpool and Everton, or Man City and Man Utd). Rje 00:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignore that, I've ammended the line to say that Coventry are a neighbour rather than a rival. Is this OK with everyone? Rje 00:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rivals

message: I have moved this page to the correct title which should be Nuneaton Borough A.F.C. instead of Nuneaton Borough F.C. It is vital to have correct official titles for these clubs so as to uphold the integrity of this project. --Siva1979Talk to me 03:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nuneaton Town F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160602124547/http://www.footballconference.co.uk/news/details.php?news_id=17561 to http://www.footballconference.co.uk/news/details.php?news_id=17561
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I will Copy edit this article as requested by the tag.  Please discuss any issues here.
*Currently I have reworded and added some citations to the introduction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stingray Trainer (talk • contribs) 20:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You appear to have removed the standard  updater which is used to update all the leagues at the end of each season and avoids the hard coding of the league into the lead of an article. Keith D (talk) 00:55, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears I did. I was editing the name of the division as it differed from what was on their website and didn't even clock it was a template. I've replaced it. Stingray Trainer (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It could be that the template has not been updated correctly with the division. Keith D (talk) 22:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  some advice please. I have been doing a general copy-edit of the article and tweaking the prose here and there. There is however a problem with sourcing information - nearly everything comes from one website or local articles. From Section 1.3.6 onwards it becomes clear that large section of this are copied/pasted from various documents at http://www.fromtowntotown.org.uk/eras.html, the lottery funded project to record the club history. Firstly, the stuff is not cited to this, but that can be fixed. Secondly, this feels like a copyright violation. Should all this info be deleted and instead a description the project and link provided, or is it ok? Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks. Stingray Trainer (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If the information is copy/pasted from that site then it has to be a copyright violation as the site indicates it is copyrighted. You would need to remove the material and rewrite it using the sources cited. Though you could include some information from the site as long as it attributed to them and in your own words. Keith D (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Copy Edit