lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:DC-15 blaster rifle

message: Quit reverting my edits of the DC-15s. It has been stated in Republic Commando that the DC-15s is a PISTOL, not a CARBINE.
:Oops. Your IP was similar to some vandals so I reverted sight unseen. Now that I do a little research, you are perfectly right. :( Gomen. --Maru 23:12, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem - I have edited this so that there is a separate section talking about the controversy. Should I move all the clone weapons into Clone troopers? Or maybe Clonetrooper Weaponry? --65.101.108.247 01:35, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I have moved the clone weaponry into, you guessed it, Clone Weaponry. I am making this page a redirect to it. --65.101.108.247 01:45, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carbine or Pistol? 

message: :See also Talk:E-11 blaster rifle.
*I restored this file because its replacement at Blaster (Star Wars)#DC-15 is so short that this page was in effect deleted, not merged. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Useful real world information was merged, cruft was discarded. The article is about a paragraph long, once the cruft is removed - what is there that you think needs to be merged? --Cameron Scott (talk) 10:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored
Talk:Manic Nirvana

message: what the hell is manic nirvana?
this isn't referring to nirvana can it be removed from album infobox --Raddicks 23:12, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zubaz

message: bllix 06:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added image 
Talk:Otherkin/Archive 5

message: You can have prannic energy in the article if you go ahead and make a page about it. I doubt such a thing exists, but if it does, it should have a wikipedia entry. Go to it! Hipocrite 19:27, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't you think it would be more productive for you to have done the redirect page I just made, or added a pipe in the link, as opposed to edit warring with me? Hipocrite 19:32, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prannic Energy 

message: I be;eive that if we were to place a disclaimer, on the articles beginning, we could speak of the beliefs as fats without people becoming cross about that.  seem reasonable?Gavin the Chosen 20:09, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No. WP:NPOV. Beliefs must be attributed to believers, then they are facts. Hipocrite 20:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

text: WP:NPOV is a policy of this encyclopedia. If you want to talk about what someone believes, you attribute it to them. Hipocrite 20:24, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gavin edits for Hipocrite 

message: Gavin, you removal of the trans comment was right and propper. I support it completly, untill such a drawer of parallels is found in a Reputable Source. Hipocrite 04:49, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where it's due 

message: should be removed, along with the sentance after it, becasue it doesnt show anything about who said irt, i mean, where does this  p;ossibly fictuiobnal parellell  come from?Gavin the Chosen 15:08, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  the transesuality parrellell
Talk:Microsoft MapPoint

message: I've updated to reflect that in Europe AutoRoute is sold as a small business and home product. MapPoint Europe is for corporate users.
Streets & Trips is North America only.
What is meant by "Microsoft MapPoint as a software is updated yearly."?
The MapPoint Client software has had releases with version numbers 2002, 2004 and 2006. (Europe 2006 isn't even out yet.) How is this yearly? 163.1.151.230 22:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Regions and uses

message: How much knowledge of Visual Basic is required for using MapPoint? Dogru144 (talk) 23:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Visual Basic knowledge

message: Version 2013 is available.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.92.206.204 (talk) 00:27, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 
Talk:Facial Action Coding System

message: "Although the labeling of expressions currently requires trained experts, researchers have had some success in using computers to automatically identify FACS codes, and thus quickly identify emotions. [5]"
Looking at [5], it does not relate to computers at all. 
74.95.10.185 (talk) 22:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  mistake in referencing reference #5 

message: Pars orbitalis is a bone; presumably there is some other muscle that is associated with a genuine smile? Vectro 21:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  pars orbitalis is not a muscle. 

message: # Blink (book). Current bestseller has a section on FACS.
It links to a wikipedia article about the book, but its still a commercial product.  Should that be allowed? Dream Focus (talk) 18:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a commercial? 

message: Can we **please** include a facial expression for each item in the section [List of Action Units and Action Descriptors (with underlying facial muscles)|https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Facial_Action_Coding_System&action=edit§ion=4]
The text seems devoid of relevance without actual human expressions for us (the reader) to relate! Hydradix (talk) 08:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion / Request 

message: Are there any issues about ethics and abuse arising from this practice ?86.135.11.52 (talk) 22:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethics and Abuse
Talk:David Keirsey

message: It should be noted that the majority of Keirsey's work is in fact based on that of C. G. Jung. Keirsey just simplified and commercialized it in order to make a business of it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.85.209.184 (talk) 15:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  C. G. Jung  

message: Apparently David Keirsey has recently died.  I am sorry to hear of this.  Some editors will insist as a matter of policy that dates of recent deaths are only added if a reliable reference can be included for verification.  I understand the sensible reasons for this but sometimes this is difficult to do for some time and sometimes it is not possible at all.  If anyone can provide some reliable citation for David's death please include it as soon as possible.  Thanks. Afterwriting (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 
Talk:Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz

message: What is an "iniciatic ritual"? 
My hunch is he means inititation ritual. ThePeg     AxelBoldt 23:54, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

message: The article says that the Chymical Wedding is attributed to Andreae. In fact he declared himself the author in his autobiography. Should this be referenced? ThePeg 19:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attributed

message: I have no idea what "English translated from German" is supposed to mean for "language".  Typically when one refers to "language" one means the original language which appears to be German, so I've changed it.Ekwos (talk) 01:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, looking closer I see the blurb is referring to some recent English translation of the original.  This doesn't make sense the article should refer to the original.  I've made other changes.Ekwos (talk) 01:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: There is no clear explanation of who or what CRC is, which is greatly decreasing the readability of this article.--Slowlikemolasses (talk) 05:22, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Christian Rosencreutz as in the German title. I inserted a clarification "henceforth CRC" before the first use of the initialism. 68.44.132.25 (talk) 19:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRC 

message: --Auric  talk 16:17, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New edition
Talk:Estates General of 1789

message: Large swaths of this article are identical to "The French Revolution"
By David E. A. Coles, a copyrighted work published in 2014:
https://books.google.com/books?id=KkBNBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA88&lpg=PA88&dq=On+17+June,+with+the+failure+of+efforts+to+reconcile+the+three+estates&source=bl&ots=LiP9_9AXgP&sig=WtA9qGrKBww_A8VvlMJT1foY_Fo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiV1arA_bnMAhWKtYMKHQs0AJ8Q6AEILDAC#v=onepage&q=On%2017%20June%2C%20with%20the%20failure%20of%20efforts%20to%20reconcile%20the%20three%20estates&f=false
Either Mr. Coles lifted this article for his book or vise-versa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Criticality (talk • contribs) 23:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright infringement? 

message: Wikipedia's French Revolution articles are stylistically pretty distinct from the average wikipedia article, which can be a good and a bad thing. The prose is good, but in many cases requires you read the entire thing linearly from start to finish to understand, as sections will reference the sections before. It's important that if someone just wants to know, for example, who disbanded the Estates General and when, that they can scroll down to find it. As well, the prose often has sections that play the pronoun game, making it incredibly difficult to understand whether the author is referring to the subject or one of the many objects. I've fixed several examples that I was able to decode, but here's one that I am still befuddled by:
Parlement refused *an illegal act*? Was the 'act' in question the action of forwarding the Subvention Territoriale or the Edit du Timbre (as the syntax would most naturally imply), or does it refer to the "Stamp Act" that was just mentioned(as the wording would most naturally imply)? If the latter, then what happened to the Subvention Territoriale? If the former, then this sentence needs to be flipped around. 
A PRIOR CONDITION FOR WHAT?????
This is a small issue, but the idiom "It was ______'s turn" only works if the person in question was an active participant beforehand.
Anyway, sorry that I'm spending more time whinging than actually making edits, I just wanted to make sure I justify what I'm up to so that people don't think I'm vandalizing the article when they see that I keep taking the word count down. This is just because clear sentences tend to be shorter, have little pomp, and flow into each-other naturally. The prose in these articles is, generally, quite good and makes the article quite fun to read.
Best,
Will
Conkaeso (talk) 19:10, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readability, narrative, etc
Talk:Prades, Pyrénées-Orientales

message: Prada de Conflent should be the first name, since it is a Catalonian town, except if it is already frequently used with other denominations in other languages (such as French -> Prades). I think it is better to put in English and Spanish versions Prada de Conflent. Especially for the Spanish one, since it may cause confusion with Prades in Baix Camp. Please, let's avoid unnecessary homonyms. Toniher 00:28, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree--SMP 20:40, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 
Talk:Isn't Anything

message: Under "Reception", the first review mentioned is from Allmusic.com, which didn't exist in 1988; the second review mentioned is from about.com, which didn't exist in 1988; the third review is from Entertainment Weekly five years after the fact. I don't get it. Why not instead mention the original reviews in MM and NME in 1988? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 22:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Reception" section doesn't say anything about the reception 
Talk:Butts Up

message: In elementary in Atlanta, Georgia I played the violent form of Butt's Up; but here at my neighborhood pool they play a less violent variant known as Wall Ball, which I noticed has its own entry, but seems (according to its article) substantially the same as Butt's Up.  So it seems silly that two different articles exist for games which vary mainly in name.
::- I'm not sure if the Butts Up terminology is used in all the other versions of the game. J. Van Meter 14:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be combined with wall ball? 

message: The way that we played, if the person being thrown at looked back, you could bounce the ball off the ground, allowing you to try to hit the person in the crotch. Fermun 19:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variations 

message: I played this game in nevada but the point was to peg the person in the butt... maybe thats where the name came from?
It doesnt mention anything in the article about the name..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.75.183 (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Butts up? 

message: I tried removing an excessive list of colloquial names for the game but this was reverted. There are 47 colloquial names listed. I will trim it down to about 5-10. The brave celery (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessesive list of names for the game. 

message: The player should throw the ball to the wall before the other player touches the wall and if not no but throws 41.223.72.103 (talk) 08:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ball touching 

message: The should alway retouch the ball before a BUTts throws is called by the player throwing 41.223.72.103 (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  BUTT throws 

message: People are using this language to MUCH 2403:580A:9541:1:AD8E:6AFC:94F6:3A68 (talk) 09:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sissy Baka is out of hand 

message: Butts Up sounds very similar to  Suicide (and both are alternately known as Wall Ball, which is a  separate, though similar, game). Should Butts Up and/or Suicide and/or Wall Ball be merged and cleaned up? 208.83.126.115 (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Butts Up VS Suicide VS Wall Ball
Talk:Haman Karn

message: What is the fate of Haman Karn?
She got defeated in her final battle with Judau Ashta, pilot of MSZ-010 ZZ (Double Zeta) Gundam. This was chronicled in the animation series Mobile Suit Gundam ZZ.--Pfalcone 11:51, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fate?

message: Something seems wrong with her date of birth. It says UC 044 (same as Gihren Zabi) but she is listed as being 22 in UC 087. I don't know which of the dates is incorrect, but the numbers just don't add up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.28.162.23 (talk) 03:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth

message: I've restored some actual facts to the article, and edited out the poorly written pro-Federation moral lecturing that people have been inserting into this article. Rei Murasame (talk) 14:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro-Federation Edits which ought to stop
Talk:Nyquist plot

message: G'day, I placed the cleanup tag on this article because it is so close to being polished it seems to be a shame to leave it even just a little bit imperfect. I random articled here and read through with great interest because it is my field of work. A few things to fix up are:
*(perhaps) the order of the paragraphs 
*the flow of the article(It reads as a series of sentances/ideas strung together)
*Add a diagram of the Nyquist plot
Please understand that it is because I think the article is good that I want to "clean it up" so no one else will ever have cause to again. It was fluke that I made it here tonight, so we'll continue on Monday?
Flehmen Work with me 01:25, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dreaded cleanup 

message: I think they are and the article should mention Cole-Cole.
Physicsjock (talk) 23:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are different projections of the same data, according to http://www.nonmet.mat.ethz.ch/education/courses/ceramic2/EIS.ppt  A mention (and comparison) in this article might still be useful though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.150.147.133 (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they are two words for the same thing and found several sources that say that; here is one: https://electrochemistryresources.com/tag/impedance-data. Here is another one: https://www.hioki.com/global/learning/electricity/nyquist.html. That link of yours doesn't work, by the way. Do you have another source for the claim that they are different? Johncolton (talk) 19:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Nyquist plot the same as Cole-Cole? 

message: A similar problem to other articles in controls, the article currently explains what the Nyquist plot is capable of but does not demonstrate how to (1) create the Nyquist plot or (2) actually do the analysis; thereby, making the article a nice abstract, but not a helpful page for those wanting to learn about Nyquist plots.  The analysis is covered in "Nyquist stability criterion" but the creation of the plot is nowhere to be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.121.201.254 (talk) 19:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method for creating Nyquist plot 

message: "Nyquist plot of the open-loop system"
This is the loop gain, right? — Omegatron (talk) 03:53, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  loop gain? 

message: Merge with Nyquist stability criterion has been suggested via a hatnote in 2016. I think this is a good idea. Concretely, it seems to make sense to merge this article into the other, since it is only instrumental for the criterion. Are there any objections? — Sebastian 14:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Support; merge to Nyquist stability criterion seems like the correct direction too; even if the plot can be used for other purposes, it is clear that the primary purpose is to check for stability. Klbrain (talk) 13:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 21:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Nyquist stability criterion
Talk:Sunni view of the Sahaba

message: Firstly, the first one works as a support for their argument, but why also include the second one about Abu Bakr, when that one only really talks about Abu Bakr and not the Sahaba in general? 
Secondly, the page linked to is fairly rabid in its hate for both Shi'a and non-Muslims... but I guess that's really neither here nor there, since the article here only contains the Qur'an quote they use to support their case.
-Paul Willocx 17:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Those quotes from islamicweb.com 

message: --Striver 20:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Resources

message: These are extreme Sunni views that not all Sunnis hold. The article is written from a controversial point of view using ambiguous language and very vague citations. It needs major cleanup and scholarly attention. Aslamt 21:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctrines 

message: I think this is pretty repetitive, and I already asked for a Sunni view of the Shia view, but got no response. I also think it's quite silly, and can only get worse: "Sunni view of the Shia view of the Sunni view". I will delete this section in a few days, unless there are any objections.Unflavoured 07:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleting shia view of the sunni view 

message: The article Uprightness of all Sahaba was recently proposed for deletion as a fork of Sahaba. While respecting the point of view behind this proposal I think a discussion of particular doctrines held by some but not all believers has some merit as a standalone article, separate from the main Sahaba page. I agree that there need not be multiple articles where a few will do, as a smaller number is of greater assistance to the reader than having to wander all across Wikipedia. 
Instead of deleting the "Uprightness" page I propose it be merged with this one, which gives a broad overview of several doctrines and already mentions Uprightness, allowing easy inclusion of the material from the other page.
Any other views and comments welcome. Euryalus (talk) 22:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I will merge. Sole Soul (talk) 04:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Due to Mohammed Ibn Abi Bakr being involved in the assassination of Uthman Ibn Affan and him joining al-khawarej afterwards, it is not prudent to be using him as an example of "The younger companions who saw Muhammad as children." ranking because he became no longer representative of the righteousness of Sahaba.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.111.19.172 (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Mohammed Ibn Abi Bakr 

message: please i am trying to show quran verses but people keep deleting them. but these are all mentioned in the books that i hav shown. so please dont just delete them. maybe they are a lot and a bit too big. but please help me improve them and not just deleting them quickly.Suenahrme (talk) 04:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sahaba in the Qur'an
Talk:Sea anenomes

message: Note there were 10 people who voted Redirect and one who voted Delete -- No one wante the article kept as it then existed. I think the redir must be regarded as supported by a clear consensus. DES (talk) 03:41, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A redirect vote is a vote to keep. I no longer purport to decide on disposition of a kept article as this is far better dealt with by discussion or being bold after the VfD, and it's unrealistic to attempt to enforce disposition. It's fine if such a consensus arises as a result of the deletion discussion but that is not the primary aim of a deletion discussion. --Tony SidawayTalk 05:47, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Milky Way (mythology)

message: This page has been split from Milky Way Galaxy.  I also suggest we merge Silvery River into it.  --zandperl 15:44, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Split and merge

message: I merged "Silvery River" here, but had some questions that I hope someone can answer:
#someone had inserted comments in the text claiming that the story of Rhea was from Hyginus so I put it in a "Roman mythology" section. If this isn't right please fix it.
#what are the Chinese/Korean/Japanese names for Silver River and Seventh night? If someone knows the characters and pronunciations please add them.
#the single line about Amerindian mythology needs some expanding. Hopefully someone knowledgable can fill that in.
Tocharianne 05:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions after merge

message: I created a new page List of names for the Milky Way to list the names in various languages. This article (Milky Way (mythology)) can be reserved for actual stories about how the Milky Way was created and got its name. Tocharianne 17:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of names for the Milky Way 

message: I propose merging River of Heaven into Milky Way (mythology). I think the content in River of Heaven can easily be explained in the context of Milky Way (mythology), and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Milky Way (mythology).PepperBeast (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As there were no objections, I've completed the merge. PepperBeast (talk) 00:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Anita C. Hill

message: I propose the page be moved to Anita Hill (pastor). Any thoughts? Rob Church Talk | Desk 01:53, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Rev Hill herself identifies as "Anita C. Hill" in order to distinguish herself from Anita Hill. I think the current names are fine and the 1st paragraph of each article clearly distinguishes the two. EdwinHJ | Talk 02:04, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What people identify themselves as doesn't necessarily govern what the Wikipedia identifies them as. It's generally considered better to go for the simpler form of the name. Rob Church Talk | Desk 02:06, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Anita C. Hill is MUCH SIMPLER than a parenthetical title "( )", which should be avoided at all costs. EdwinHJ | Talk 02:08, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Move

message: Moving unsourced material here. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added some of this, sourced to R-W's own website which seems a RS for straight facts. PamD 09:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced material
Talk:E-Amusement

message: This article sucks. How does the card WORK? is it RFID? It needs to be wikified also. 70.80.113.243 23:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  e-AMUSEMENT Card Usage 

message: I threw in the fact template on that part specifically...I don't know of any PS2 games to use e-Amusement and all of the descriptions in the article only mention their arcade counterparts. --Thunderbird8 (talk) 02:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playstation 2 availability?