lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Veggie Rocks!

message: This page should be deleted. 68.34.4.143 (talk) 21:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Under what criteria? —Akrabbimtalk 21:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The criteria for deletetion of coarse! Rowdy the Ant (talk) 01:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No page
Talk:Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum

message: Each word of "Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum begins with a capital letter. The main page should therefore be spelt "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Vasorum_Antiquorum"; anyone entering "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_vasorum_antiquorum" should be redirected to the former, not vice versa, as is the case at the moment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.135.91 (talk) 13:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital letters 

message: The mandate of the CVA as described here is pretty confusing, and the confusion carries over to other articles. The term "classical" is thrown around without much consistency. We read that it includes the 7th millenium BC. Then we have a reference to the classical Greek period. Exactly what is the CVA doing, and which CVA? Where does the CVA online fit in? Definitions need some clarification, which I will try to do.Botteville (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I have adjusted a bit, but the CVA website is itself rather vague. Clearly the 7th millenium BC is not classical in any sense. I imagine the printed volumes, & maybe the online ones, contain some prehistoric material from the early days of wider ambitions. Johnbod (talk) 10:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi John, nice to hear from you. I'm finally getting around to doing something with the pottery.Botteville (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Mandate on the CVA
Talk:Solar Systems (company)

message: "Solar Systems is a leader in high concentration solar photovoltaic applications".  If an assertion like that is to be made, it would be at least courteous to list a few other competitors in the arena in order to do a comparison.  The whole article smells a bit like a company brochure, all the external links are to the companies website.
:Generally useful information, but not very encyclopaedic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.189.37 (talk) 01:39, August 28, 2007 (UTC) 
::I've added an 'advertisement' banner along with updating their solvency status. Oosh (talk) 02:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language is a bit NPOV
Talk:Edward Guinan

message: I would say that there is sufficient assertion of notability, in that he is claimed to have discovered the Neptunian ring system. Whether that is enough should be an AFD debate.  My personal opinion is that this is definitely enough. --Pekaje 14:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I translated your nice stub into German Lemma and loved the remark about Gunains aunt Whoopi :) . Any source avaialable? --Polentario (talk) 22:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lancia in Formula One

message: This article is intended as a single point to which all F1-related references to Lancia can link. If the place where Lancia's F1 involvement is described (currently Lancia#Lancia in Formula One) ever changes, then we only need to update this single redirect, rather than a whole bunch of articles. DH85868993 14:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale
Talk:Einstein Bros. Bagels

message: this chain used to be called Melvin and Elmo's.
: I thought it used to be called "Bagel and Bagel" --96.255.132.198 (talk) 23:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

message: How did it get the name "Einstein Bros."? Badagnani (talk) 18:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Anyone read this article? Might as well be a pamphlet you found in the restaurant itself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.209.206.28 (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obviously written by some corporate mucka-muck 

message: This edit -- as of "08:39, 9 July 2015" (in some time zone) -- says: "(→‎History: removed unsourced info)". 
I don't know the details of what happened before that edit, (the "Talk:" page is pretty silent about that); but apparently in most Wikipedia articles, there is a "custom" of attaching [when appropriate] a little label, as a "superscript" -- saying something like "[citation needed]" (for example, using the "" template, which expands to this:). 
Shouldn't this article also follow such a custom? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 01:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[citation needed]" 

message: This entire article is unorganized and makes no sense. The history of the corporation is not based on a timeline that makes any sense. The intro section has a sentence that doesn’t make sense. The article says the company was founded in Colorado but makes no mention of Colorado in the history section. This article does not clearly answer who owns the company, how it started, where it started, the history of the merges, etc. 71.196.190.13 (talk) 16:46, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs rewrite
Talk:Ankimo

message: As one discovers in following the link to monkfish, this term is used of two quite different animals. My guess is that the sushi is made from angelshark liver rather than anglerfish liver, but this is speculation on my part and I don't know how to be sure. My reasoning is that the anglerfish "monkfish" is an Atlantic creature, hence unlikely to figure in Japanese or Japanese-derived cuisine, whereas the angelshark is apparently found near Japan. --Haruo (talk) 05:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monkfish in what sense?
Talk:Nicola Abbagnano

message: Not sure why this article has been marked as needing copy editing. The prose is not the most fluid, but it's grammatically okay. However, it's right to point out that sources need added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xcia0069 (talk • contribs) 12:33, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

message: The article omits any reference to his energetic and convinced support of Fascism. Quite a bit gap.!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.32.7 (talk) 13:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supporter of Fascism
Talk:Mr Muscle

message: WHEN was there no website for Mr Muscle? The article reads like it is talking about the 1970's (when Mr Muscle was developed). Haven't deleted, because a clarification would be better.
: Added  to that phrase. -- Jwinters | Talk 14:57, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

message: I cleaned up a lot of the language of his article. It read like an essay or an email. It's still not great, but it's better than it was. Fixed a few typos that led to unintelligible sentences, as well. I also removed the "Recreational uses" section, which described how to create a "chemical weapon" with this product and aluminum foil. Using the product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling, especially to make a potentially harmful device is illegal, and doesn't need to be in here. 97.82.247.200 20:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and removal of dangerous chemical wepon recipe.
Talk:Robert Ludlum's The Bourne Conspiracy

message: Ok E3's over.  Any more info on it?  The article says it will have cut scenes from the film, but will it be based on the novels, films, or a combo of the two?  Any info? 64.16.40.18 05:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any More Info? 

message: im removing this section as it not needed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by S02178 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acheivements
Talk:Cryptobotany

message: I don't know how to confirm or deny this, so I did not edit it, but the image and caption don't seem to match. The lithograph looks like a depiction of an African legend, yet it says the image is from Central America. Both of these places have legends about human-eating plants, but the image seems to depict three Africans. Even if these are Africans brought to Central America, the legend would have still originated in their homeland and been imported.
Of course there's also the fact that these 19th century artists are notoriously bad at depicting indigenous people of all regions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.127.65.91 (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I object to the allegation that cryptobotany is a total pseudoscience. This is totally POV. Maybe the article has things the wrong way round. Some cryptobotany may well be pseudoscience, but it is also true to say that some "respectable" botanists are cryptobotanists, since they are looking for unknown or hidden (crypto) plants. Someone who looks for rare orchids is as much a cryptobotanist as someone who looks for man-eating trees. There is just an artificial boundary that creates a false division between the two. --MacRusgail (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your objection is based on a misunderstanding of the definition of the word. Cryptobotany does not mean the search for unknown but mundane plant species. As a quick google search will show you, the term is used to refer to the search for "legendary", "fantastical" plants with outlandish properties or behaviors. As the article correctly explains, it is a pseudoscience by definition. RedSpruce (talk) 21:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Those are the meanings of the two roots to the word yes. But the word as a whole means the study of legendary plants believed by mainstream science to not exist.   Many words do not strictly mean what you might think from their roots. APL (talk) 21:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Greetings to anyone watching this page.  I removed the section on hallucinogenic and mind-altering plants, for the simple reason that it doesn't seem to have anything to do with the topic of the article, cryptobotany.  ClovisPt (talk) 22:28, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph removed 

message: First, see this thread at the Fringe Noteboard: "A Long-Term Wikipedia Fringe Problem: Wikipedia as a Cryptozoology's Pókemon Database". Next, after doing a Google Books search for the term cryptobotany, only two pages of results are returned. Two pages. And the vast majority of them are simply cryptozoology. This article appears to simply just be an extremely obscure extension of the pseudoscience of cryptozoology—the same people, the same history—but with plants. Is this simply supposed to be a sort of promotional tool then? I'm redirecting this to cryptozoology. :bloodofox: (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting to [[Cryptozoology]]
Talk:Nordion

message: I am an employee of MDS Nordion and, in respect of Wikipedia's policies regarding conflict of interest and neutral point of view, simply submit the following updates for the community to incorporate as appropriate. 
 
MDS recently completed a strategic repositioning which saw the Company divest its MDS Analytical Technologies and MDS Pharma Services businesses. The company is now focused on MDS Nordion, which is a leading provider of innovative technologies for use in medical imaging and radiotherapeutics, and sterilization technologies. 
 
Also, shareholders of MDS Inc. have approved a change of name from MDS Inc. to Nordion Inc. The company anticipates that the name change will be finalized in Q4 2010. 
 
Based on the above, the MDS Inc. page as it stands is in need of an update. It also seems appropriate that a new article/stub should then be created for Nordion.
 
Links:
http://www.mdsnordion.com/investors/strategic_repositioning.asp
http://www.mdsnordion.com/reports/2009_engannual.pdf
http://www.mdsnordion.com/our_company/about_Nordion.asp
http://www.mdsnordion.com/our_company/our_history.asp
Puddy99 (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. Please feel free to update this page to make it more accurate. So long as this statement remains on this page, the Wikipedia community is contented upon an assumption of good faith on your part to make the necessary changes yourself so long as your edits are neutral. -- œ™ 22:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strategic Repositioning of MDS Inc.
Talk:Gulripshi District

message: « the north-western part of Gulripsh district was part of Upper Abkhazia » : « north-western » or « north-eastern » ?--Budelberger (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western ? 

message: Situation with this article's name is same as here Talk:Tkvarcheli district#Requested move, this district capital's name is Gulripshi thus its district will be Gulripshi district (see also Talk:Gulripshi#Name)--g. balaxaZe✰ 11:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name  

message: Many (if not all) Abkhaz in the western Turkey are from Tsabala. All Abkhaz the villages in Bursa are founded by Marshans (safe one which was founded and populated by Koyaa).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.172.83.41 (talk) 09:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it should be mentioned. Do you have sources confirming this? Alæxis¿question? 14:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isnt it awkward not to mention situation before the caucasian war?
Talk:Upper Falls, West Virginia

message: What additional information would be useful to add to this article?  Thpn 14:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

message: The Tornado, West Virginia census designated place (CDP) has been subsumed by the new Upper Falls, West Virginia CDP, which was created by the United States Census Bureau for the 2010 Census. In 2011 January, when the Census results are published and the resulting Upper Falls article is created, I intend to move the content relating to Upper Falls from here to that new article. At that time, this article will need to be changed to reflect the demotion of Tornado from the status of a CDP to one of a populated place.  Thpn (talk) 23:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tornado has been Demoted from a CDP to a Populated Place 

message: The Tornado, West Virginia populated place has been eliminated from the United States Geological Survey's Geographic Names Information System database.  Furthermore, the former Tornado, West Virginia census designated place has been marked as "historical."  As a result, "Tornado, West Virginia" no longer officially exists.  Therefore, I am updating this article to reflect this new status and renaming it "Tornado Post Office."  Thpn (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a difference between the CDP and the populated place: the only way that it can have ceased to exist is if all the people moved away, and even then it would be a ghost town.  Nyttend (talk) 04:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

text: You should do your homework before making edits, especially when you're wrong.  In addition, your condescending attitude is extremely unattractive.  Yes, a populated place can cease to exist, when the United States Board on Geographic Names, the United States Census Bureau and the United States Geological Survey mandate it.  Tornado no longer exists, by the authority of every agency of the United States Government with jurisdiction in the matter.  But you know more than all the GIS professionals in the United States government combined, right?  Did you even bother to click on the old link to the USGS page for Tornado?  If you had, you'd have seen that it has been removed.  Did you bother to do a search for Tornado in West Virginia on the GNIS website?  If you had, you would not have found a record for Tornado, West Virginia.  Officially, the U.S. Geological Survey says that the inclusion of the Tornado populated place in their records was "an error of compilation during Phase II data collection for West Virginia and should have been entered as a variant of Upper Falls at the time."  If you wanted to restore the article for historical purposes, you could have left the Tornado Post Office article alone and created a new article for "Tornado CDP, West Virginia (historical)."  But clicking "undo" is so much easier, isn't it?  Thpn (talk) 21:37, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tornado, West Virginia Populated Place Has Been Eliminated
Talk:Depth in a well

message: I am the author of the original article on its original WWW location www.feswa.org.  A committee of members of the FESWA non-profit professional organisation decided in 2006 to migrate the effort under which this article and others were written, to Wikipedia, to share it with the world and invite the world to contribute.  We are leading an effort to develop a practical knowledge base for the discipline of formation evaluation, using Wikipedia as a platform.  As it matures on Wikipedia, the corresponding content will be removed from the FESWA website (which I am also the webmaster for) and replaced by a reference to Wikipedia.
I am also the author of the figures and am sharing them under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.
For these reasons I submit that this page, and others like it also visible on the [FESWA website:http://www.feswa.org] should be kept live on Wikipedia.
Thank you.
Meranti 09:38, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. The problem with this article is that, as it appears right now, it violates the guidelines specified in What Wikipedia is not, which is official policy. Specifically, it violates the section "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" as it appears to be part of a "frequently asked questions" guide, and an instruction manual. If you can clean up the article according to wikipedia style guidelines, and provide information, with credible sources, that does not violate WP:NOT, I suggest you do so soon. Jhinman 09:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: Content corresponding to  has been removed pending verification of the permission. Please see WP:IOWN. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:46, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 April 24 for original listing. TheFeds 01:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright verification required

message: This article should have some content about how offshore rigs measure their height relative to the datum, particularly pre- and post- GPS. 124.47.132.132 (talk) 04:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurement
Talk:Type 63 anti-aircraft gun

message: Here are the two versions of the same paragraph sentence by sentence that I edited to improve it language-wise and size-wise:
The first sentence is redundant because it wouldn't make sense to design a self propelled anti-aircraft gun to not meet the requirements of one. Later on there's a mention of Soviet T-34s and Chinese Type 85s. Seeing how the Chinese imported only a small number of T-34s before starting the production of Type 58 it only make sense to think that Type 63 SPAAGs were based on Type 58 tanks. Also seeing how Type 58 is simply a designation for Chinese T-34-85s it makes the mention of T-34 also redundant.
"an added open top turret with twin 37mm anti-aircraft guns to them" and "the turret was replaced by an open top one armed with with twin 37 mm anti-aircraft gun" mean exactly the same thing although the first version is written badly. The second sentence is exactly the same. 
"The resulting vehicle, the Type 63, was a severely limited weapon." and "However the Type 63, was a severely limited weapon." mean exactly the same thing although the second version is better written.
"The Type 63 has no provision for radar control and had to be sighted and elevated manually." and "It wasn't radar-guided and thus the guns had to be aimed manually." again mean the same thing but the second version is better written.
The final sentence is exactly the same.
Therefore I did NOT delete any information. I simply improved the way it was written. - SuperTank17 (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologize about that little mess up, at the time I wasn't thinking straight due to the day I was having, and in my mind I thought your edit was vandalism. Sorry about that. Nohomers48 (talk) 13:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nohomers48's doubts 

message: One source I have read states that the type is in fact nothing more than an improvised expedient, one-off design. If I may quote from The Complete encyclopedia of modern military weapons (Chris Bishop, General editor, Prospero Books, Etobicoke, Ontario, c1999, ) p. 131: "It was not until over twenty years later, when information on weapon development began to emerge from China, that it became apparent that there never had been a Type 63 gun equipment. The specimen capture in Vietnam had been just that - a specimen, the only one of its kind, cobbled together by some unknown and unrecorded North Vietnamese workshop from a redundant tank chassis and a twin 37-mm gun mount, probably from a naval origin, encased in a home-made shielded turret. Whaterver its effectiveness as an air defence weapon might have been, it was certainly effective in diverting the energies of several intelligence experts for quite a long time." How should this doubt to the true existence of class be incorporated?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.252.89.147 (talk) 00:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bike Moose doubts
Talk:FAI Super Cup

message: What about the President's Cup? Wasn't that a one-off game between the holders of the cup and the league?
That was run by the LFA and was only for teams in Leinster. RedsIndependent 23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Just Listen (novel)

message: Some one should reword or rewrite the description paragraph.  It's not very well done and is more like the blurb you read on the back of the book to pull you in than an actual summary of the work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.10.131.1 (talk) 16:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

message: Hey I just edited some of the characters' descriptions. Just wanted to remind you to write in PRESENT TENSE. Connie Sol (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: Hey, I was curious as to where the source for Sophie's last name came from. I don't remember her last name being given in the book, although I do remember her dad being referred to as Mr. Rawlins. 70.166.133.20 (talk) 05:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sophie's last name
Talk:Cytotechnology

message: — Assignment last updated by Jellyfish829 (talk) 11:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Molecular Genetics