lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bipyramid

message: The basic materials of which the staff is made: aluminium, copper, iron, zinc, a brass, cupronickel, quartz, glass, lazurite, a nephrite, a jasper, corals, turquoise, amber, a cedar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shatilov Konstantin (talk • contribs) 18:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bipyramid (Magic Staff)

message: []  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.122.151.50 (talk) 10:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Architecture of a bipyramid in the Temples

message: Take a bipyramid, cut it in two along its equator, and rotate one of the halves so that its vertices alternate, around the equator, with the vertices of the other half. Take the convex hull of the result.  It has kite-shaped faces, and is face-transitive. What is it called?  I think it is regular enough to deserve an article.  Or maybe it has an article already, which should be linked to from this one. Maproom (talk) 12:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If the original is an n-bipyramid, seems to me you have a 2n-bipyramid. —Tamfang (talk) 19:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, of course you do. Stupid of me. What I should have said is, as well as rotating one half, separate the two halves by exactly enough that the faces of the convex hull are four-sided, kites in fact.  (For the special case of the triangular bipyramid, the kites are squares, and the result is a cube.) Maproom (talk) 19:31, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

text: It's the dual of an antiprism and it is called ... (clickety click) ... a trapezohedron, among other names. —Tamfang (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Maproom (talk) 22:28, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are these called?  Skew bipyramids?
Talk:Venice of the North

message: When has this term ever been used for Bornholm? --Rasmus81 12:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Before I put this in it was just a redirect to Stockholm.  I did a search for the text "Venice of the North" in google and added all that I found there . Bornholm is in DenmarkGraeme Bartlett 23:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I did a quick google searc with city name + "venice of the north", and am removing all items with less than 150,000 hits, leaving the top 7, which I put in order of notability. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 21:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I object to the criterion of google hits. It's arbitrary, anglocentric and non-encyclopedic. "Fermat's little theorem" has 69000 google hits. Does that make it non-notable as well? Ragnagord (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed non-notable items. 

message: The Dutch village of Giethoorn is considered a Venice of the North. Wikix (talk) 23:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And so are HUNDREDS, if not THOUSANDS, of other little towns and villages across the northern hemisphere. Only the most notable examples are included here, and Gierhoorn is VERY FAR from notable. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, Giethoorn is quite famous for being considered a Venice of the North. Wikix (talk) 23:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not famous enough for this article. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See this overwhelming amount of hits on Google. Wikix (talk) 23:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's A LOT less than Manchester with 191,000 hits. That means there are A LOT of other towns that would rate higher than Giethoorn that are not on the list. Sorry, but Giethoorn isn't notable by far. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the present list is rather small and could be extended. In previous versions Giethoorn was on the list. Wikix (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

text: You could mention it in the article on Giethoorn, though. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 00:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giethoorn 

message: I added sources for Copenhagen and Manchester and removed the 'additional sources needed' banner at the top of the page. If you want to remove Manchester from the list feel free, but I advise you put a notice or  warning inside the edit page (and possibly even mention this in the talk page) so that future editors will hopefully respect the 'more than 200'000 hits on Google' criterion. Angelikfire (talk) 16:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added all missing sources
Talk:Community education

message: I've corrected formatting and spacing. Kathleen.wright5 13:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article creation

message: The lede focuses on a Scottish system of community education right now. This article should be globalized so I am tagging it for this reason.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 03:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lede

message: Dear fellow editors,
I wish to add the following to the Community education topic: Can I possibly get your comments? Thank you.
Community education 
The concept of community education produces numerous ideas, concepts, and issues. Community education involves stakeholders in problems-based approaches to local communities. It facilitates the local to global linkage. The integrated approach utilize what students and communities know or understand. It leads to the development of additional solutions, questions, or issues. Community education generates efficiency and opportunities for cooperation in tackling local problems and challenges.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285378433_Community_Education_for_Social_Justice 
The classroom turns into a classroom. It ensures a long-term association with active and not passive undertakings as citizens. Schools have emerged as community centers which are open almost all day. These offer safe places for community ventures further than the traditional school schedule for students. Schools can collaborate with different community organizations for support and resources. Museums, community centers, service organizations, and non-governmental organizations offer additional specializations that can improve community development.
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/community-education-for-social-justice-cameron-white/1121139309 
School and community partnerships build empowered communities that actively take part in the process of academic education and engage in lifelong learning. 
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ633483
LOBOSKYJOJO (talk) 02:16, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan to Add new section
MediaWiki talk:Accesskey-ca-nstab-project

message: Hello! Since gerrit:930625 was merged a couple of weeks ago and has now been deployed, this page is no longer necessary – the MediaWiki software will still have the "c" access key even if this page doesn't exist. In other words, the page can safely be deleted without any functionality changing. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 13:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete
Talk:Stack cake

message: This cake seems to be well-documented and also sounds quite yummy, so it should not be deleted.Stepp-Wulf 03:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found this article very useful.  Sure, it's a bit obscure, so that's exactly why I wanted to know more about it.  I say keep it as is.
Romigkat 19:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep it!
Talk:Castle Hill High School

message: Ive added an infobox, but it needs a logo and school colours to be inserted, Im not great with either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozrepublic (talk • contribs) 02:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: The school has had 2 principals in the past 4 years and to reflect this changing staff trend I believe that it should be Current Principal. any thoughts?
(CHHS Student) NotinREALITY 10:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Suggested:''' change "Principal" in infobox to "Current Principal" 

message: Who let If28 remove nearly 500 bytes from the article given that he has previously been disciplined and banned for vandalism?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NotinREALITY (talk • contribs) 06:28, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  If28 Edits
Talk:Partial template specialization

message: Partial template specialization is a method of optimizing generic code at compile time. 
Total bullshit, its not for optimizing for for taking care of special abilities, e.g. that its a pointer, or that for type X some access to whatever is done otherwise. what about informing before writing,
:Yes, this article contains mostly incorrect information on a very narrow subject. I rewrote the first paragraph for a better definition of partial specialization. The "Templates and specialization" section should also be expanded to cover more uses of partial specialization. Containers are just an example. There are lots more uses, see for example Template metaprogramming.  Ufretin (talk) 11:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the terms are used somewhat interchangeably, but the standard uses "explicit specialization", so I made an informed decision to use that term. There could still be good reasons for using "full specialization" instead, though. I am aware that Vandevoorde and Josuttis avoids the term "explicit specialization" in their C++ Templates:The complete guide, for instance. decltype (talk) 06:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I think there should be an example. That's what people would be looking for. Ben  T/C  11:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Definitely. I'll fix it when time permits. decltype (talk) 13:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

message: I don't think this line is correct :
// legal: base function template overloading the return type
template <typename ArgumentType>
void Foo(ArgumentType arg);
Return type is not used for the function signature in C++.
109.89.54.237 (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. By using int and char, which are type-convertible, it did not make the concept clear enough. I have fixed it by using string and char. Further, I made a distinction of which ones are overloads, as you rightly point out. Thanks for the careful review! ← scribbleink ᗧHᗣT 18:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overloading function by return type
Talk:The Salvation Army, Sydney Congress Hall

message: Some one else maybe able to confirm but I think On Fire is either currently inactive or finished. Should the section in the article then be removed or changed to reflect that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.54.70 (talk) 01:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Fire Big Band
Talk:List of Lebanese Australians

message: I am happy with merger.  Question is whether we maintain the list as a separate article or as a section of the article on Lebanese Australians.  It is a relatively long list - I suggest a separate article is in order as the article on Lebanese Australians should really be expanded further.--Matilda talk 22:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Proposing that List of Lebanese people in Australia be merged into this article as they are functionally the same. FlalfTalk 21:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I think that is the standard way of referring to them in Australia. AverageFraud (talk) 08:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Camblesforth

message: The building is a Wesleyan Chapel.  The board outside calls it "Camblesforth Village Church".  The parish council website calls it "Camblesforth Chapel" or "The Chapel".  The Snaith and Selby Circuit call it "Camblesforth Methodist Church". Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:35, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church or Chapel 
Talk:Forest District (Sydney)

message: Since when has The Forest District had a capital? And if so why would it be Forestville? There is no governmental significance to Forestville. It is not geographically central. In fact if anywhere was to be capital it would be Frenchs Forest as it is geographically central and has a central area containing The Forest High, Forest Primary School and Forestway Shops (the largest day-to-day shopping centre in the District) all within close proximity of each other. In fact the large intersection of the two main roads in the Forest District (Warringah Road and Forest Way) is all that prevents the three places listed above from linking up and forming a big town centre. Also the proposal of a hospital next to The Forest High would further reinforce Frenchs Forest as the central area of The Forest District.
Irishroyalty (talk) 15:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital? Surely Not!
Talk:Burning for You

message: Can someone suggest a neater way of showing the instrument credits for each track - while I applaud the inclusion of the information, I feel that the current way of expressing it is cumbersome (and inconsistent with the track numbering). I've tried showing the credits by track (in small print) but this messes up the numbering and takes up too much space. Best Witchwooder (talk) 09:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel/instruments played
Talk:Gangstar: Crime City

message: I think a plot summary and a character list would be a nice addition to the Gangstar article... Blake Gripling 12:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article expansion

message: The link to fandom has been removed repeatedly by myself (and ) as a violation of our external linking guidelines. Per WP:ELNO #1 we should not link to "any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article. In other words, the site should not merely repeat information that is already or should be in the article." If, for some reason, the fandom link should be included against the guidelines, then there would need to be consensus for its inclusion here prior to adding it.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already replied to your whataboutism ad nauseum on your talk page. You need to focus on getting consensus for this specific link for this specific article.  -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to fandom wiki
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Threat

message: So in the end, is the consensus of the AfD discussion that this article be kept as it is, with no title change? -Eric (talk) 12:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing at Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page that indicates that a page can't be moved after it survives an AfD. In my opinion, in this instance, we're not talking about a petulant desire to destroy the page because you can't stand its continued existence. It's clearly good faith. :) Renaming the page would create a new redirect from the original name, and the original page is not destroyed. Since there's already a disambig on top, the best alternative might be to rename the page so to preserve the history and turn the new redirect into a disambiguation page, directing to three articles--the newly titled one, the film already referenced & the general article on pain. I'm not an administrator, but I'd be comfortable making that change. --Moonriddengirl 13:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, no, I won't rest until all memory of it has been erased! Just kidding. Your plan sounds good, but what's the "general article on pain"? What did you think about my last response on the project page? -Eric (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. :) It's been a busy week, and I missed this one. I'd personally be more inclined to simply move it to Threat (international law) unless we get another kind of threat (international law) and need to disambiguate another step deeper in. :) I'm not ready to go to arms over it, however. The general article on pain is my getting two AfDs confused. (We went through something similar with the article on agony quite recently. Oops!) What I meant to suggest was creating a disambiguation to the general article on Coercion, which is currently a "see also." --Moonriddengirl 19:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No prob. What did you think about my "public international law" finding/idea? (my last response on the project page) -Eric (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not entirely sure what you mean. :) Are you asking what I think about calling it "Threat of force (public international law)"? --Moonriddengirl 20:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, because the int'l law component of the Threat article seems to be the part people find notable, and because when I poked around on the net, I found that there were mentions of the concept of "threat of force" in "public international law," but no real occurrence--and no definitions--of simply "threat" in "international law." I'm no expert in the int'l law domain, but I have done a ton of research on terms in various disciplines for my work, and I can size up pretty quickly during a search if a given term is commonly used. Whaddayathink? -Eric (talk) 22:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say go ahead, then, with the title that you prefer. --Moonriddengirl 23:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Threat]] AfD closure
Talk:Megaversal system

message: The list of sources is synonymous with the supplements for the game, as familiarity with the role-playing genre will tell you. It is sufficient for wikipedia's needs, unless you see some need to challenge the information therein. ---Mr. Nexx (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than just cut-n-paste my reply to multiple pages, I responded at Talk:Palladium Fantasy Role-Playing Game#Removal of Uncited Sources Tag so we can have one, centralized discussion on the issue.  --Kralizec! (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Uncited Sources Tag 

message: The line stating that several mecha OCCs could be combined into one generic OCC seems to be a personal opinion. I'm removing it. 58.96.102.34 (talk) 04:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of opinion/OR
Talk:Donkey Serenade

message: The title "The Donkey Serenade" is from a Rudolf Friml/Herbert Stothart song from the 1937 film, "The Firefly", with Allan Jones and Jeannette MacDonald.  The clever lyric is by Chet Forrest.  "The Donkey Serenade" was a very popular novelty song for decades and was recorded by everybody from Nat King Cole to Mario Lanza, from Artie Shaw to the King's Singers and the Comedy Harmonists.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.130.202.220 (talk) 23:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title history 
Template talk:Paradox Development Studio games

message: I reverted to my last version because:
*Arsenal of Democracy and For the Glory are not developed, but only published, by Paradox (such as Galactic Civilizations II or Lead and Gold, see full list), and certainly should not be included in the official EU/HoI series.
*The games expansions don't have their own articles (see Europa Universalis III#In Nomine for example): why include links to subsections, if there are ones to main articles?
Okay for Crusader Kings section, if the sequel was announced. --Enok (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: I created a new template based on this, since Paradox has split into two companies since January. The developer is now called Paradox Development Studio, so I changed the name and made all the links go there instead. Maybe you can change this template to be about games published by paradox Interactive instead? Since they are a pure publisher now. Darakir (talk) 11:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New Template

message: I removed  East vs. West – A Hearts of Iron Game because it wasnt developed by paradox development studios which is what the template is for. It was published by paradox interactive and developed by Bl-Logic.—  dain- talk   12:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  East vs. West – A Hearts of Iron Game
Talk:University of Western Australia Library

message: Currently several sections of the article read as if they are promotional materials for the Library: emphasising successes, engagement, innovation etc. Should be edited to take a more objective viewpoint and only provide this information when it is substantiated and relevant. I'm flagging these changes for other contributors as I've been helpfully reminded that I have a conflict of interest here, so I'll avoid making substantive edits from now. Lavinia.james (talk) 03:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article tone
Talk:Arboretum of the Barnes Foundation

message: I was about to merge this page with Barnes Foundation of Philadelphia.  If/when the Barnes art collection is moved from the Lapsley location, having the arboretum as a separate page will make sense, and notable in its own right. So to avoid future confusion I think its best to remain. Mitico 12:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arboretum as separate page from Barnes

message: There have been newspaper reports about the future of the arboretum after the works of art have moved to the Parkway. Information about this should be added to this article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future of the arboretum
Talk:Interlock System

message: With the recent problems we have been experiencing, I am wondering if this should be merged into Fuzion to show a history of game system development. Turlo Lomon 12:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How different are they?  I have only played 1 Fuzion game before and have limited knowledge of Interlock, mostly from Cyberpunk. Web Warlock 16:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?
Talk:Airedale

message: Could somebody add another to the list of Airedales? Airedale is also another suburb of Castleford, West Yorkshire.  Borders with Ferry Fryston. The river Aire runs through Ferry Fryston towards Ferrybridge and past the Power Station.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelduly (talk • contribs) 02:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In Airedale (disambiguation) ϢereSpielChequers 07:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

message: Time is against me on this. I will be adding more things to this in the future and possibly re-writing it. The joy of all things (talk) 15:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under Construction 
Talk:Georg Hajdu

message: Is this a vanity article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.12.106.192 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I consider this remark an insult since the quality and impact of my work hasn't been assessed by the person who didn't even have the decency to identify him/herself with a username. I'm open to an objective discussion about whether or not I should be represented on Wikipedia (which should be based on facts rather than a general exclusion of autobiographical texts). I suspect that a very high percentage of potentially important artist biographies will need to be deleted if Wikipedia applies a very strict NPOV policy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Georghajdu (talk • contribs) 23:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2007 AFL Rising Star

message: Oppose. Allied45 (talk) 08:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 
Talk:Woodhouse Moor

message: There are no citations for the many claims in here, the wording is also very unencylopedic.  If it is not corrected soon, I shall remove the section.  I also find 'Activities' an inappropriate heading for the section, given its content (unless of course rape is considered a legitimate parkland activity). Mtaylor848 (talk) 11:10, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Activities section 

message: There is no citation or verification for the claim that pranks carried out on the statues are by students; in fact my own tacit knowledge is that what is perhaps one of the most famous(the painting red of the Duke of Wellington's boots) was in fact a middle aged local resident the first time around. I have removed the statement Acidsaturation (talk) 13:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mischievous students