lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moka Only

message: Big dick bastard, i swear, on one interview on youtube, i think smokes with mokes. He says something bout an album called that. Anyone else hear it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.174.65 (talk) 00:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: The body of this article seems to be pulled straight from a website or something, it's written with superlatives and should probably be fixed.
129.100.254.158 (talk) 15:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Body is not neutral
Talk:Cryptanalytic computer

message: This article is very small and contains not much information than its name itself. Shouldn't it be merged somewhere? --Arny 03:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps. History of computer hardware or Supercomputer might be good? Alternatively, it's plausible that we could expand this article. The NSA (US codebreaking agency), and initially GCHQ/GC&CS (UK version), have produced supercomputers for cryptanalysis that have been the most powerful in the world at various times. — Matt Crypto 16:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well, it's clear to this reader that none of you guys read Bamford's Puzzle Palace. Or at least not closely enough.  You likely have visited the NCM, but not inside the gate.  You can merge with other areas, but you should suggest where and what NOT "if". Also, I don't regard it as my place to fix wikipedia's NSA misconceptions or some of the technical short comings in wikipedia about this topic (I'm not paid to be a cryptanalyst). 143.232.210.150 (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  An on the fence opinion 

message: The tale of hardware instruction inclusion goes back 2 generations of Cray architecture to the CDC 6600 before the Cray-1, and it's in the 6600 book.  Oversimplified, not much more was added to the instruction sets unique toward crypto in between. 143.232.210.150 (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not merely the Cray-1
Talk:Teresa Demjanovich

message: In my opinion there is an underlying currect of POV prevalent in this article, such as frequent references to an assumed "God" and to the reader. Thoughts? K-UNIT 03:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is seriously flawed. It reads as OTT religious hagiography. Any time of hagiography (whether in rock music, religion, on politics, sex or anything else) is a no-no on Wikipedia. Hagiography involves an almost propagandistic tone of devotion that is not NPOV. This article needs severe rewriting to remove the devotional tone. Overall there is the bones of a good article here. It is just swamped with hagiographic tones. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 13:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessive hagiography

message: http://www.news.va/en/news/pope-approves-miracle-attributed-to-american-nun Irish Melkite (talk) 09:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soon to be beatified 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  21:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Children's literature/categories

message: Discussion: Can we add Middle Grade to the genres? Tem2 18:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely!  I wonder if that's a US-specific designation, or if other English-speaking countries use it as well.   Deborah-jl Talk 20:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say, from the UK point of view, that it's not used here, though might well be understood, if vaguely --Abbeybufo 14:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

message: :Category:Children's literature is parent of all subcats and contains all articles that don't belong elsewhere.
:Category:British children's writers (which has English and Scottish subcats right now) and :Category:American children's writers should be subcats of :Category:Children's writers.  An item should never be in a cat and a parent cat simultaneously, right?
We should CfD :Category:British children's literature.  Individual books and writers can be British, but children's literature as a whole is not.  An article :British children's literature might make sense, if it's discussing national specifics of the genre.
Should there be any Young adult literature categories?  Some proposed articles, such as Problem novels, would certainly belong in :Category:Young adult literature, but I don't think we need to recreate the entire books and writers trees as :Category:Young adult books and :Category:Young adult writers.  It makes sense to leave those under :Category:Children's books and :Category:Children's writers, no?  Right now the :Category:Young adult literature contains mostly author and book pages that should probably be recategorized, and, as a sign of how difficult it would be to have separate trees, some, such as Eragon, are published as children's, not YA.
Should we have :Category:Children's literature awards, and if so, should it be subdivided nationally?  (And, again, do young adult awards come under these cats?  I think they should.)  We have at least two awards each listed for the US and the UK.
We need :Category:Children's literature series
Deborah-jl Talk 07:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to join this conversation so late, but have only recently got into wiki - can do article on Children's Book Awards if required, having written book on them which lists over 60 worldwide awards for English-language books - could upload a list of these fairly easily (and soon!) if required, and try and wikify it later as I know there are articles on the main US and UK awards to link to...does this need to be a category, and article or a list - or more than one thereof? Think the chart looks good, with the extras as you mention above --Abbeybufo 14:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:The First Duty

message: User Jahgro recently made this deletion, stating that no citation could be found and that it was probably speculation. I could be wrong, but I think I remember coming across some or all of this material in an interview in a DVD bonus featurette some time ago. Whether the featurette was connected to this episode or to Star Trek: Voyager, I can't remember. Also, I don't have access to the DVD's at this time, so if anyone else would like to investigate and re-insert the material with a citation, please go ahead. — Cbbkr (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent deletion by [[User:Jahgro]]
Talk:Starfleet Academy

message: Doesnt starfleet predate UFP? After all the Enterprise (NX-01) was not a federation vessel. -- Cat chi? 14:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starfleet predates the UFP 

message: What about the "real life" club organization? 74.243.201.45  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.243.201.45 (talk) 17:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It can be found here. Hooper (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Real Life

message: Here the Starfleet Academy uniforms are shown in the picture as being colored magenta and dark violet.  What other colors have been shown as being the colors of the Starfleet Academy uniforms?Keraunos (talk) 01:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Color of Starfleet Academy uniforms

message: It isn't a fanon website.Dalek9 (talk) 07:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is. Or, at least, it fails our criteria for WP:RS. --EEMIV (talk) 11:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is not fanon based on the definition from Fanon_(fiction). (Whether it is canon in the respective franchise is independent from whether it is or is not acceptable as a reliable WP source.) According to that page, "fanon is a customary and unofficial canon established in a spontaneous manner by the community of fans at large, for example fan clubs, whenever the official canon is not clear on some points of its narrative[1]." The Ex Astris Scientia website, in contrast, defines itself as sticking exclusively to the official canon facts, in fact pointing out inconsistencies in the canon, but not attempting to reconcile them by making up additional facts (fanon) (cf. "The canon policy at EAS accepts the definition of canon given by TPTB as the easiest way to avoid unnecessary discussions. (...) In contrast to websites that are based on a "personal canon", EAS neither ignores canon accounts at the outset nor adds non-canon information." ). Hence, calling it "fanon" is incorrect. To avoid confusion, "a website about canon" would probably be a better description than "a canon website", as the latter could be mistaken for saying that the website in itself is canon. The website is not, it just lists merely canon facts and no fanon facts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.180.10.42 (talk) 15:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Should there not be some mention of said website somewhere on this page? Perhaps in the "other references" section. As one of the leading  websites on the topic of Star Trek, and having been maintained for over 20 years it is more notable than, for example, the TV series based on Starfleet Academy which was never produced. 160.3.224.250 (talk) 18:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ex Astris Scientia website 

message: I'm not sure that Starfleet Academy is notable. A few hours looking for good sources came up empty, with there being a few enyclopedia entries and mentions of the new TV show, but no significant independent and reliable coverage. Perhaps it would be best to merge it with the Starfleet article? Imzadi23 (talk) 06:27, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:The Game (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: What disk is "The Game" found on?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.166.204.57 (talk) 20:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions and Suggestions

message: I just stumbled here randomly, and I'm kind of amazed the article isn't semiprotected against people stating that they just lost it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.201.57.5 (talk) 23:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Lost it? Or, they predicted the effect of web games and social media? 2001:BB6:B405:5939:9A4:5FA6:BA5C:635D (talk) 10:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The Game
Talk:Contagion (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: Moved here from article
The battle the Enterprise E was listening to was not taking place at Earth however it was the Federation fleet's prior engagements with the Borg.
The Enterprise E manged to arrive at Earth in time for the main battle.
I feel this doesn't belong in the references section but have no time at the moment to place it. Seems more like discussion anyway. Britmax (talk) 10:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Journey's End (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: The two terms "Native American" and "Indian" are used interchangeably (and confusingly) in this article. I propose to replace all the former terms with the latter in line with the usage on the episode itself. Presumably the term was not used because the word "American" is not appropriate to settlers on other planets and in fact is carefully avoided by Star Trek characters.--AssegaiAli (talk) 20:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But "Indian" in this context does not refer to, or have anything to do with, the country of India. LarryJeff (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:Ménage à Troi

message: Several of the edits recently added to the plot by User:212.153.139.117  and User:MetalViking666 have added detail which I feel is excessive for an article already carrying a "This is just plot, add more other stuff" tag.
For instance;
* Why do we need to know that Mr Homn drinks the leftovers?
* Why do we need to duplicate that ferengi females don't where clothes?
* Why do should the plot describe OO-mong?
* Why do we need to know that Wesley at first doesn't recognise the distortion?
And so on and so on.
SPACKlick (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Increased Plot Depth
Talk:Pippa Black

message: Citation needed?  Just watch her on Neighbours and you’ll see it yourself.91.107.95.213 (talk) 18:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left-handed 
Talk:Point-in-time recovery

message: Created the page, saw it linked from PostgreSQL and felt some clarification might need to be made for some people who aren't familiar with this. grrowl 04:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Point-in-time recovery means you can recover from any point in time since the last backup. This article suggests that Windows XP has this ability, I assume the author is talking about the System Restore feature. If you have a restore point from last week, you can only restore your system to the state it was in last week. You could not for instance restore to yesterday. Therefore System Restore is not an example of Point-in-time recovery. --138.80.0.10 (talk) 01:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Very Wrong
Talk:Thomas Hearns

message: I uploaded the added a photo. It is an actual photo I took to sell the framed item on eBay, but nobody bought the thing- at least at the price I was asking, and I have grown to like it and thus decided to keep it. I know the photo 'in the photo' must be copyrighted, but the photo I took is so poor in quality that it cannot be mistaken for the original, thus it doesn't violate wikipedia policy IMHO. Now, whether it looks any good is another matter, but the article had no image and I could not find a copy-free image.--Mikerussell 04:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page seems written by a fan!
Come to bed with me says Antonio, here 04:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Groove Coverage

message: Although I havent added any new information, I cleaned up the singles list a bit.  Kudos for community editing! - CerebroJD 02:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up a bit.... 

message: I've added information post-release of their third album, completed the list of singles, added a list of remixes, fixed some years... also uploaded album and single covers and made them in a nice list. I'll try to compile a biography of some sort and add more information.
Byeee 10:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra Info 

message: Any hope of a exhausive or near-exhausitve chronologial list of whose songs they covered? I'm curious who are the original authors of those songs. - 13:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covers? 
Talk:Pittsburgh Passion

message: The bulk of the content currently in this article appears to come directly from the team or league's PR staff.  I've removed some of the obvious POV and unencyclopediac material and generally tried to organize it.  More work needs to be done but this is a good start.  --ElKevbo 04:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: As you can tell, one of my specialties is the expansion of coverage of Women's American football and its member teams.  Part of that includes information on their historical record, standings, roster, and schedules.  However, a certain user has a problem with that I do there, calling my edits inaccurate and outdated, removing the entire references to their historical record, standings, roster, and schedules along with it.  I have requested to talk with him/her/them several times, but to no avail...that user claims to be part of the Passion staff, which I pointed out may be a conflict of interest.  As of right now, this user has officially violated the Three-revert rule, requesting that I be banned from editing this page.
Could somebody please step in and mediate?  Thank you. Tom Danson (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Coverage
Talk:Slow (Kylie Minogue song)

message: Is the claim of a cover by George Michael accurate? I could only find a video on Youtube, and it seems to be an amateur recording by someone else and a still picture of G. M. It doesn't actually sound like him. There's no mention of 'Slow' on G. M.'s website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poikkeusreitti (talk • contribs) 21:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that the photo on 'that sunlounger' was captioned "with civilians", which suggests "lesser mortals" while that is a great opinion to have (common among the generation of Kylie fans) I have toned it down a tad for Good Article status; the sources seem adequate for GA status, if the article were an average Aussie scientist they'd be flattered.  I'll be happy to finish proof reading and copyright checking if I can finish it without being distracted... I'm still not sure that's possible. - Adam37 Talk 18:49, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Two Gallants (band)

message: This is not what encyclopedia articles look like. This is subjective tripe written by a label promotion-man.
:Hi there.  It looked that way because that's what it was, a copy of the official Saddle Creek press release.  I've done an overhaul, feel free to dig in. T K E 04:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the edit long ago, and it should probably be revised.  The point was in the musical roots of acoustic, melodic play rather than the progressive, electric play that differentiate the two blues sounds and how they are represented in popular music today.  So no source, feel free to re-write.  Keegantalk 05:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Both of the footnotes are broken.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.26.125.156 (talk) 02:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thanks. --CutOffTies (talk) 03:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnotes 
Talk:Austin-class amphibious transport dock

message: I'm not sure if I'm the first to say this, but the main article here says that the NVR considers the Austin type to be three seperate types, while the link currently (30 MAR 2006) gives it as one. NVR LPD Page--Mtnerd 04:21, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not anymore.  They list them as part of the LPD 4 Class aka the Austin Class. ViriiK 11:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory Information 
Talk:Comalcalco

message: Attention! Please do not remove or edit the "twin" image, as this will automatically be fixed as soon as the file comalcalco.jpg is removed from this server. I already entered the request. The replacement files are already on Wikipedia Commons, and after deletion it should look like in the german Wikipedia version. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comalcalco  Thank you.

Not sure what its all about.--Rockero 04:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from main article space

message: I don't understand the move of this article from Comalcalco to Comalcalco, Tabasco. That seems against how other Maya sites are listed, and there seems no need for a disambiguation, as Comalcalco is simply a redirect to here! I therefore propose the page be moved back to the simple title "Comalcalco". -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, further disambiguation is unnecessary. Was surprised to see it'd been moved under Comalcalco, Tabasco abt 2 years ago, guess it sorta slipped thru the cracks. Can't keep tabs on everything; anyways I've moved it back to its orginal, and simpler, title. Thx for picking up on it. Cheers, --cjllw ʘ TALK 06:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move back to Comalcalco
Talk:That Which Survives

message: If the Enterprise was thrown around 1000 light years away, and they returned at around warp factor 8, surely the journey would still have taken them around 100 years? PatGallacher (talk) 20:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The old ST Technical Manual described warp speed as the cube of the warp factor in light years. So warp 8 by this old method would have been 512 times the speed of light, so at the maximum it would have taken them about 2 years to travel this distance. However, future episodes and the Next Generation has made warp speed more of hyperbolic exponential gradient. Since canon is what we see on the screen, and they have never produced anything on screen that tells us what is really going on, it's really just speculation and what the writers want to say at the moment. StarHOG (Talk) 02:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The journey would still have taken them around 100 years?
Talk:Hippo (disambiguation)

message: you may want to add the hippocratic oath to your linkage page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.67.152 (talk) 04:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disambiguation pages don't include "links that include the page title in a longer proper name, where there is no significant risk of confusion" (Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Partial title matches). The Hippocratic Oath, unlike say the hippopotamus, is not referred to as "Hippo". EALacey (talk) 10:05, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hippocratic oath
Talk:The Offspring (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: The line "akin to the use of "san" as an honorific in certain dialects of Japanese" seems bizarre. What dialect of Japanese does "san" not have the function stated here? This appears to me to be equivalent to claiming "Mr" is only in certain dialects of England's English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.183.98.163 (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - I am removing it as that last bullet point is not cited at all, and really doesn't belong anywhere in the entire article. 75.134.26.34 (talk) 08:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Btw: is there any connection to the Offspring album The Next Generation? :D 31.18.231.7 (talk) 14:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:The Drumhead (TNG Episode)

message: This was an terrific episode to watch, especially at the end where Picard indirectly but quite effectively nailed Satie by quoting her father. But I still don't quite understand why Satie reacted so furiously to the point of ending the investigation and leaving the Enterprise. Unless I'm missing something, it seemed like an overreaction. --Waterchan 20:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's because she's insane! ;) And I agree, it's a wonderful episode. It is somewhat troubling to note that an episode based on the witch hunts of the 50s is even more relevant today than it was when it first aired... "We think we've come so far. Torture of heretics, burning of witches, is all ancient history. Then, before you can blink an eye, suddenly, it threatens to start all over again". So true...The wasd man 01:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Satie's furiousness and reaction to Picard
Talk:The Emissary (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: Can we use a verb other than "mate"? Its a bit ... gouche in this context. Jay Dubya (talk) 12:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If only there was another four-letter word with the same meaning. Anyway, it's a Wiki, feel free to edit as you see fit.   2001:9E8:462C:4900:5D4A:CE71:B2B1:845C (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verbiage
Talk:SS Botany Bay

message: I've redirected this article to Khan Noonien Singh, which seems the most appropriate topic. This article makes no assertion or substantiation for notability, and has remained largely unchanged since the no-consensus AfD. However, considering it is a big of background dressing in the episode, movie and books in which it appears, and that the article mostly regurgitates plot covered elsewhere, it seems unnecessary to sustain the article. Edit history is maintained for anyone who wants to merge *cited* content elsewhere. --EEMIV (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect