Template talk:Portals browsebar

message: Personally, I do not see why one editor who apparently can not make up his mind about anything is allowed to mess up the look of the portal that I have worked so hard to create.  My portal is not under construction.  It is being viewed by the public.  No problem.  I have changed the portal so that it will stick to the browsebar that I had selected and worked so hard to get. -- John Gohde (talk) 15:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are referring to my edits. If you look at the history of the browsebar, and any other page, they change routinely.  I see your claim to personal ownership of Portal:Complementary and Alternative Medicine is moving along nicely.  RichardF (talk) 16:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

text: This portal has opted out of your total nonsense. -- John Gohde (talk) 12:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since portals don't have free will, nor do you own it, your confrontational statement has no bearing on whether or not the browsebar applies to it. RichardF (talk) 13:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I make no such claims. If you don't like it change it. :-) RichardF (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I reverted the test you complained about. Quiddity reverted a link to a specific portal. There is no "intended to be" design that can't be changed. The navigation system is not perfect and it will continue to evolve. RichardF (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And, I have just opted out completely due to the never-ending nonsense that is still going on. -- John Gohde (talk) 02:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Browsebar Problem has been fixed Permanently 

message: Thanks to Quiddity for bringing back the browsebar as it was intended to be.  I saw no consensus reached for making any major changes to this bar. -- John Gohde (talk) 15:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the test you complained about. Quiddity reverted a link to a specific portal. There is no "intended to be" design that can't be changed. The navigation system is not perfect and it will continue to evolve. RichardF (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And, I have just opted out completely due to the never-ending nonsense that is still going on. -- John Gohde (talk) 02:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank You! 

message: Removed the word/link "portals" from the beginning of the browsebar, since all the links on the browsebar already lead to that very same page.  The whole page is covered, by links to all of its subsections.  The Transhumanist (talk) 19:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Portals:" 

message: don't you guys think that the given below format would give a nice look. Sushant gupta (talk) 12:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Bar-style templates basically are a minimalist style.  The less included, the less to clash with specific pages. I prefer it without the box. Sorry. RichardF (talk) 18:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  well, nothing to be sorry about. i thought that it would be better to have a box because we have this box on the main page where the portals are mentioned. it would look a bit standardized. anyway thanks a lot for your comments. Sushant gupta (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  well formated browser 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Weak support, it is a better description, but a perfect description is not critical because readers don't see the names of templates. Sitta kah (talk) 12:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Portals/Design#Random_portal_link. The link would be Random portal, which would look like this: Random portal. - Evad37 [talk] 14:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: - Evad37 [talk] 03:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed  new random portal link 

message: On 13 November 2019, Portal:Contents/Portals was moved to Wikipedia:Contents/Portals per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Contents#Requested move 9 October 2019. I propose that the links in this template should also be changed to the "Wikipedia:" link. I don't believe this would be a controversial change; I just can't do it myself. Greatedits1 (I hope so | If not, let me know) 02:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested link changes because of page move