Template talk:Prophets in the Quran

message: I think there's no need to include names in Bible since it's not a christian encyclopedia --Mido 04:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the links to the biblical names, but have kept them in the template. I believe that they will be help for those learning about the Prophets of Islam. I have also created a few new articles specifically pertaining to the Islamic prophets (like Ibrahim). I got a complaint on the Abraham article about the template (in the edit summary) since Abraham is not just a prophet in Islam. I didn't think the rationale for removing the template was reasonable, but the section on Ibrahim in Islam was getting too long anyway. Feel free to help out on the Prophets of Islam page; I think it's pretty obvious what I'm doing. I'm doing section editing, one prophet at a time so others can easily help out. I'll usually delete the index of verses for the prophet I'm working on. joturner 23:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. This is a very nice template. --a.n.o.n.y.m   t 00:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

text: It should be considered as harmless as it would be to have Greek and Roman names on a template for information's sake. That isn't done, but both have near equal recognition in the English speaking world. Perhaps the Biblical names should be in italics though. William Quill 11:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Isn't Muhammad called, "Muhammad" in English?--Steven X 12:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I came across this template while trying to understand the concept of prophecy in Islam for some minor expansion at Religious persecution. (You probably know, there is this issue about it with the Bahá'í Faith.) If you want an outside opinion, it would say that 'Paraclete' should be removed. Zara1709 (talk) 12:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biblical Names

message: This is a good looking template, but it is large for some pages. I wonder if a second, compact version could be used for pages where this one might look too big. Or maybe one with a vertical format would be useful. These would be in addition, not instead of. Thoughts? Tom Harrison Talk 14:28, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it might be a little difficult to condense this. And, in my opinion, vertical look more intrusive. joturner 22:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: should he be included in as he is considered as prophet by Muslim scholars?
more here:
#Encyclopaedia of Holy Prophet and Companions By Ashraf, Shahid, p199
#Stories Of The Quran, Ibn Kathir
~atif Talk 07:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ezra/Uzair 

message: All prophets are seperated into two pages. The view of Islam and outside Islam, the same should be applied to prophet Mohammed. Kavas (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mohammed in Islam?

message: Jesus is older than yahya/john the baptist, so should be in order if this is ordered in terms of date. Someone65 (talk) 16:57, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation needed; is that the teaching in Islam? The Bible says that John's mother Elizabeth conceived 6 months before Maryam. () – Fayenatic London 21:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Jesus is older