Talk:Great Pyramid of Cholula

message: Reading the article does not make it clear where the pyramid is supposed to be. Under the hill, besides the hill, on the hill? And if so, what volume was measured? It is pointless to discuss the exact volume before defining where the border of the pyramid is?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.16.63.28 (talk) 13:30, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Agree with Validity? + Where is the pyramid anyways?

message: Where is the evidence that a pyramid is under that hill? All that can be seen is just one piece of construction that appears to be build onto the side of the hill.  There is no explanation why a giant pyramid would be covered by such a huge mound of dirt, and since the whole site is ruined by a church, there's no way to dig in order to find out if indeed there is a complete pyramid beneath.  I hope in the future, articles such as this, as well as other archaeological sites can be watched a bit better to make sure we are dealing with encyclopedic information and not tourism industry hype.  Basically, I do not trust this article.
As well as may be, but it is actually well sourced and have been there myself. The tunnels are currently out of operation due to rockslides but the tunnels were until recently publicly accessable and go deep within the pyramid structure. It is well documented and the article itself is well sourced 189.145.173.52 (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Validity?

message: I visited Cholula less than one month ago (2005). After going through the tunnel and the excavated areas, I walked around the surrounding roads. On the other side of one of these roads was a fenced off area containing an unexcavated mound clearly in the shape of a small pyramid. There were no sings of any kind. Does anybody know anything about this pyramid? — Hippietrail 14:53, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Small pyramid mound nearby?

message: as it is, the large photo is screwing up the layout and covering the other photo. how should one go about correcting that? (my layout design skills are non-existent). --little Alex 02:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: photos

message: :Image:IMG 9754.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:IMG 9754.JPG

message: The volume estimate provided on this page is based on the standard method to calculate a true pyramid. This isn't a true pyramid the sides rise steeper than a true pyramid would and then there is a flat top so if the base and hieght dimensions are right then the volume should be much higher perhaps closer to 6 million cubic meters or more. More precise estimates would require more precise dimensions of the tiers. good day Zacherystaylor (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume estimate is low 

message: according to my archaeology book the pyramid-temple was built from 200 bc-800ad.... and only went through 4 stages of construction.. so i changed this 
The temple-pyramid complex was built over many dozens of generations, from the 2nd century BCE to the early 16th century
 
to this 
The temple-pyramid complex was built in four stages, starting from the 3rd century BCE through the 9th century AD  Adrian lugo18 (talk) 04:51, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: btw. is it possible to let everyone know how this "archaelogy book" is titled and by whom it was written? thanks in advice -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 12:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  construction dates and amount of phases totally wrong 

message: square meter? shouldn't it be cubic meter? Sorry if this is a stupid Question -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 21:19, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks to IP, also for let me find out by myself that this thing was corrected -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 18:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  4,45 Million square meter 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Great Pyramid of Cholula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722225136/http://www.inafed.gob.mx/work/templates/enciclo/puebla/Mpios/21119a.htm to http://www.inafed.gob.mx/work/templates/enciclo/puebla/Mpios/21119a.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926012343/http://www.vivecholula.gob.mx/tradiciones.php to http://www.vivecholula.gob.mx/tradiciones.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110107232009/http://www.vivecholula.gob.mx/ciudad.php to http://www.vivecholula.gob.mx/ciudad.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713202324/http://www.letsgo.com/14512-mexico-travel-guides-central_mexico-puebla-cholula-c to http://www.letsgo.com/14512-mexico-travel-guides-central_mexico-puebla-cholula-c
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926012343/http://www.vivecholula.gob.mx/tradiciones.php to http://www.vivecholula.gob.mx/tradiciones.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why does the text say "25 m" whereas the graphic says 50 m? Britannica says 54 m and http://www.mesoamerica.de/mexiko-zentral/cholula/50cholula.htm says between 60 and 70 m. Heilongjian (talk) 14:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height