lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:American Theater Hall of Fame

message: It's just a listy stub now.  It needs more narrative description of what the Hall of Fame is about, its history, etc.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: How are the people listed in this article (an incomplete list by admission) chosen?  Why are there redlinks listed while people like Richard Rodgers are missing?  Powers T 15:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The List 
Talk:Román González (boxer)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: One article moved and 2 way DAB set up at base name. Andrewa (talk) 21:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
===Post move===
There are now 50+ (but less than 100) incoming links to the DAB at Román González, some of them from articles. The ones from articles, article templates etc should be fixed, and I'll get to them in time, but help (particularly from someone who is up to speed with the automated tools to do this) would be appreciated.
,  I assessed strong consensus to move but note that the disambiguator was not agreed. Discuss here and I'll fix it if necessary, I went with the original RM (to stop creation of further links to the base name, editors will now get a message telling them not to) but happy either way and I hope we don't need to go back to RM to fix that if needed. Andrewa (talk) 21:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: There are now 50+ (but less than 100) incoming links to the DAB at Román González, some of them from articles. The ones from articles, article templates etc should be fixed, and I'll get to them in time, but help (particularly from someone who is up to speed with the automated tools to do this) would be appreciated.
,  I assessed strong consensus to move but note that the disambiguator was not agreed. Discuss here and I'll fix it if necessary, I went with the original RM (to stop creation of further links to the base name, editors will now get a message telling them not to) but happy either way and I hope we don't need to go back to RM to fix that if needed. Andrewa (talk) 21:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Post move
Talk:Urenui

message: Hi Boethius. Please say rude things about the Urenui golf course building its 12th hole right next to the marker of Te Rangi Hīroa's birthplace. It must get clipped pretty often. And I was sure that I remembered it being closer to the domain road and further from the river than it now is. He pokokohua rātou! Mention the marae (I think it's the main one for Ngāti Mutunga). I think the marae is just called Urenui, but I'm not sure.—Koro Neil (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thanks for taking the time to read the page, at least. It's rather unbalanced on the side of resources vs. actual text at the moment - but, like you, I haven't got actual access to the resources: so I'm not really able to write the article.
Now - to the golf course. A couple of observations.
1. This is an encyclopaedia - and not really a place for the advocacy of local issues: no matter how just or heartfelt. IOW, we gotta be neutral - and it's difficult to see how such an issue would affect or interest a reader from the other side of the world as being important enough to be in an encyclopaedia. It's very difficult to write an article without what Wikipedia call a POV (or Point of View), and, should I include such an addition as you suggest, the article stub might just get flagged, flamed, or vandalised. Or deleted entirely.
2. It's taken me the best part of a day to locate, collate, and hand-code the resource list that I've added to this article stub. I don't want it all destroyed (or reverted, as the Wikipedia community call it) because of a perceived lapse in judgment.
So - how to resolve this? One suggestion comes to mind...
1. You could make a note in Te Rangi Hiroa's biography that the local golf club has done what it has done. Non-pejoratively... Something like...
"Interestingly, the Urenui Golf Club has.... " 
And just state what they've done. If someone makes a comment thereafter, that's most likely the time that the issue can be discussed and an appropriate annotation may or may not be made... :)
Eirenically,
Boethius65 (talk) 06:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: the golf course 

message: Wikipedia is an on line encyclopedia, and an article should provide content of notable information, not just a list of references or items in a museum somewhere.  This article has a very long list of external references, and the relevance of many of these is not clear.  If the content of any of the items listed under Further Reading is notable and relevant to the article, this should be summarised and added to the article.  But (IMHO) this article is not the place for a long list of references and museum items. --Pakaraki (talk) 19:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long list of items for further reading 

message: No mention of the fact that the town's name translates to "large penis"? Muzilon (talk) 08:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology?
Talk:Trails in Ithaca, New York

message: The external links that were provided in the section "Cayuga Waterfront Trail (Incomplete) are relevant to this article and are NOT for advertising purposes.  They link to web sites with opposing views to the support for the Cayuga Waterfront Trail.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdkayak (talk • contribs) 
:Still, they are not appropriate there per our external links guideline.  If they are reliable sources (see WP:RS), what I tink they are not, one of them is on a 'personal' site, not on an officially recognised site, then please use them as such.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also: we are not a soapbox, see WP:SOAPBOX.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Ours, you also might want to read our conflict of interest guideline.  Are your sources published or backed-up by a third party?  --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Look, some information is appropriate for an encylopedia article and some is simply not. This is not the right forum to debate the merits of the trail. And no, I am not a City employee or in any way connected to them. I understand that this is an emotional issue, but you should really save the advocacy for your personal web page. Quinten (talk) 17:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Earl of St Germans

message: List of earldoms (section- Earldoms in the Peerage of the United Kingdom, 1801–present) sorts Earl of St Andrews and Earl of St Germans between Earl of Snowdon and Earl of Stockton. I suggest that there should be consistency between the sorting on that page and the sorting in Category:Earldoms in the Peerage of the United Kingdom. Incidentally, the same principle is true for Earl St Aldwyn and Earl St Maur, which it sorts between Earl Sondes and Earl Sydney. Alekksandr (talk) 14:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be consistency, and "St" should be sorted as "Saint", as is normal in British English. DuncanHill (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - can you suggest a mechanism to ensure that this happens in List of earldoms? Thanks in advance. Alekksandr (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Defaultsort
Talk:Hudson High School (Wisconsin)

message: Can anyone specify where is it situated. I mean the country. and add some more details too! --SMS  Talk 14:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Polish Museum, Rapperswil

message: Is it true that the museum is going to be closed??? Hope I,m mistaken about the closing. Please do not allow to anybody to distroy what was built for centuries. This is history and should be kept for others,   
Thank You,    Zuzanna Rozenbajgier…  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.20.104.30 (talk) 13:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A few residents of Rapperswil have requested that the Polish Museum be evicted from the Castle.  You may contact the Museum and sign a petition that the Museum be allowed to remain at the Castle.  Nihil novi (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The petition may be signed at   Nihil novi (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum, 
Talk:1928–29 Boston Bruins season

message: I'm rather surprised, Alaney ... far from being a "myth," it's a known fact that Boston Garden was originally built by Tex Rickard and the MSG folks and bore that as an original name.  A casual glance at the Boston Garden article gives that information.  If you need references, a simple Google News archive search reveals hundreds .  Just a teensy bit of research, is all.   Ravenswing  15:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boston Madison Square Garden
Talk:Kumi Miyasato

message: I recreated the article. I believe that a recording artist / voice actor that played a central role in an anime series, released 3 full studio albums, and had a decent amount of coverage by the Japanese press is a relevent subject for Wikipedia.Tuxedo Mark (talk) 14:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The recreation now asserts WP:N notability, but is still in some small danger because it does not provide any WP:RS reliable sources to verify the assertions.  I just marked the article unreferenced, so it is not so likely to get speedy deleted, but it is still eligible until sources are provided.  A good source might a magazine or newspaper review of one of her works.  As far as I know, Japanese press coverage is sufficient, but it must be explicitly cited.  One or two should be enough to prevent deletion, but if you can find three or four that would be ideal for an article of this length. JackSchmidt (talk) 14:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Kumi was active before the Internet, so most of her media coverage was in print and on radio and TV. I do have extensive lists of public appearances and "prominently featured" discussion in print, a small list of radio appearances, and a few videos of Q&A sessions and singing, but how would I go about citing this? I have no translations of the video or access to any of the print media.Tuxedo Mark (talk) 01:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't able to find anything, but searching for Japanese sources is not my strong suit.  If the list of public appearances appeared in print in an independent publication, then citing that should enough to indicate she was famous.  You might be able to find something at Victor records (RCA records now), or from its owner Sony BMG, but reading the relevant wikipedia pages makes me doubtful.  I may try a few reference librarians later this week.  It should be trivial to get newspaper coverage from the 80s, but one just needs someone experienced with the japanese papers.  Which papers would have music reviews? JackSchmidt (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure about newspapers. The lists of public appearances, print coverage, and radio appearances appeared on a website that's no longer up, but I had saved the lists and added them to my own site: http://supergirl.741.com/kumi/index.html Will this help? Tuxedo Mark (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Also, I'd like to point out that the Japanese Wikipedia has an article on Kumi Miyasato. I'm not sure what their requirements are, but I think it proves that she's actually known in Japan.
Maybe that article can help to locate some references for us to cite here?
Tuxedo Mark (talk) 03:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Wikipedia article
Talk:Provinces of Chile

message: Just a quick note - the naming should remain as it is on both this page (Communes of Chile) and the provinces page (Provinces of Chile). I noticed these changes and have moved them back to their proper pages (I also noticed that the user did not move "Regions of Chile" to "List of regions of Chile" - inconsistent). This is a standard developed at WP:Countries and is reflected among most of the country articles and administrative subentities. Thanks! :) Rarelibra (talk) 14:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:Peterstown House

message: Unfortutately this photo was misidentified, mea culpa, and I will be replacing it soon with a new color photo...unfortuately this photo shows the contruction better than a new one will, due to the presence of siding on the present Peterstown House which was doubtless absent when it was first constructed.PreciousRoi (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sherlock Holmes: The Musical

message: Hello!  I'm a student at Cornell University and for my course, Online Communities, we are editing Wikipedia articles. A couple of my classmates and I have taken on the project of updated the current Sherlock Holmes: The Musical stub. If anyone has any suggestions for us, please let me know! -- Thanks Jnd1091 (talk) 15:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Sherlock Holmes the Musical stub 

message: The roles should go on the left side, with the names of the cast members on the right.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Roles and original cast

message: I linked cast members to their reference on this page. I also changed the order to Role: Actor name to follow the advice from the talkpage. Jnd1091 (talk) 03:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roles and original cast 

message: The most important missing section is a full-blown plot synopsis.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot synopsis

message: I transferred from our draft (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Quainiac/draft_Sherlock_Holmes_the_musical)  the "related musicals" section, updated with links to other pages. Jnd1091 (talk) 03:43, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related Musicals 

message: I added an interesting remark from Leslie Bricusse, creator of Sherlock Holmes the Musical that discusses how there have been many artistic adaptations of the Sherlock Holmes stories.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnd1091 (talk • contribs) 04:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: We added sections on critical response as well as the 1993 revival at the old vic. Quainiac (talk) 04:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Response/Old Vic Revival

message: Added images of Old Vic, Baker Street and Ron Moody Jnd1091 (talk) 04:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Our draft page for this article can be found at (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Quainiac/draft_Sherlock_Holmes_the_musical) for further information regarding our edits  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnd1091 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  For earlier edits... 

message: This is a good start. Add more references (I see unreferenced paragraphs) and you can nominate your work at WP:DYK for front page exposure. Note that this nom has to be done within five days of the move (so, within five days of today). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:32, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review comments
Talk:JVibe

message: I've removed some text from the JVibe page - is it now considered to have neutral POV? Please let me know what else to alter so that it is appropriate.
:What would be appropriate would be if you respected our WP:COI guidance, and did not edit or create articles that you are involved with. Mayalld (talk) 15:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Black Industries

message: The announcement is here. Please add it as a link. 85.227.226.235 (talk) 15:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well, GW quickly eradicated the entire BI web site. All visitors are crudely redirected to FFG. This made all links break. Let's insert new, external, ones. CapnZapp (talk) 10:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to the Black Industries website
Talk:Cap-Vert

message: At the risk of being awkward, this might be its official name in Senegal, but is it the common name in English, which I would say was Cape Verde? PatGallacher (talk) 13:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Cape Verde is the nation of Cape Verde, made up of islands off the coast of Cap-Vert. There is also Cape Verde (disambiguation), which provides more information. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Lave Winham

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 03:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Lave Winham →  – WP:COMMONNAME. Newspapers.com shows three total results for "Lave Winham" and two are from a 2003 article. "Lafayette Winham" returns 65 results. I would make the move myself but Baseball-Reference and most other modern sources say "Lave." Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 02:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 December 2023
Talk:Ali Campbell

message: The part which says "last gigs together were in February 2008 in Australia, New Zealand and" cannot be correct - this is stated when February 2008 has not yet arrived.
Jtbagwelljr (talk) 15:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

message: The song is "Rat in Mi Kitchen" not "Rat in My Kitchen" and not as reported elsewhere on Wiki "Rat in the Kitchen."
Jtbagwelljr (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect song title 

message: The only two things in this section which are accolades are the mention of the Ivor Novello award and the Grammy nomination.  Everything else should be removed.  Being "top fifteen" is not an accolade. Runsninth (talk) 11:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: wp:so fix it  Skinsmoke (talk) 08:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I have! Runsninth (talk) 12:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accolades 
File talk:CAN2008 resztvevok.png

message: Nice in principle, but at the resolution at which it is shown in the article, it looks like there are 5 countries in the tournament.  Kevin McE (talk) 15:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

message: This image is wrong. The creator seems to have highlighted the country of Guinea as well as Guinea-Bissau. Guinea-Bissau are not participating in the tournament, this map must be corrected.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timath91 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This map has an error!
Talk:Luftflotte 1

message: Apologies for the cryptic title. I am referring to two articles. Luftflotte 1 as well as Luftwaffe North (Ostland) detachment (Luftflotte 1, Baltic Area). Both of these articles are on the same subject of Luftflotte 1. From what I can see, the second one was created perhaps as part of German Air Fleets in World War II ? Its significance is lost on me. Although they both are stubs, I don't know any rationale behind maintaining two articles. I am currently working on Organization of the Luftwaffe (1933-1945). This will eventually reference articles on all the Luftflotte that are there (7 in all) Question is, are these two articles identical enough to initiate request for combining ? Please share your thoughts. Thanks Perseus71 (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why not considering that the one is a subset of the other and lacks much pertinent information.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge away, especially as the North article has no references. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're nervous of merging, ask MrBee for help or advice. He's done a lot on the Luftwaffe aces. He might have some insight into why there are two articles. Otherwise, as they say, be bold.  Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As a matter of fact, that's the first thing I did. He has given his blessing already. Merge templates placed on both. Discussion Page is here. Appreciate if you folks could post your support there. Thanks for all the support. Perseus71 (talk) 00:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Can these two be Merged ?

message: *support I support the merge MisterBee1966 (talk) 15:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Should it not be called Luftflotten 1? scope_creep (talk) 21:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Luftflotte 4

message: I think I am going to greatly expand this article later this summer when I have the time. Dapi89 (talk) 18:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *support I support the merge MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:01, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Luftflotte 5

message: *support I support the merge MisterBee1966 (talk) 15:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I'm confused. . . .The invasion of Norway took place on April 9th. Luftflotte 5 was formed on April 12th and only active from April 15th. How could it be involved in planning the invasion and controlling air operations? It seems to me Luftflotte 5 was an administrative set-up that would become operational AFTER the succesful invasion - not before.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.146.72.151 (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the invasion started on 9 April, but the Norwegian campaign lasted two months, and Norway was occupied territory ‘til the end of the war; and Luftfotte 5 was responsible for German air operations throughout pretty much all that time. So the statement is accurate enough. But if you can think of a better way to phrase it, make a suggestion. Xyl 54 (talk) 17:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: (Query)

message: I notice these articles have been merged now.  
There was a merge discussion above but I wouldn’t have said there was any consensus to carry it out. The argument against a merger was that the other article had some serious problems (not least because it was entirely unclear what it was referring to). 
This page is about Luftflotte 5, a recognized unit with a five year service history. As far as I could see the other page was a conflation of Luftwaffe units serving in Finland at the end of the war, under a title that has no provenance anywhere. It was also unsourced, but appears to have been lifted bodily from an external website, which is never a good idea. 
Now the whole mess has been transposed to here, giving undue weight to it on this page. 
This article already has an outline of the unit, which contains the phrases "In 1944 these formations were reorganized again; Nord Ost became...Ff 3" and "On the ground...LgK Finnland became K.G. Finnland, with a similar remit in Finland and, later, northern Norway": It also has a table of sub-units, listing all of them, not just the ones that served in Finland, and puts them clearly in context. I suggest these adequately describe the entire content of the other page, which could be deleted from here as duplication without any loss (and probably some improvement) to this article. 
If there are no objections I propose to do that. Xyl 54 (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objections ! MisterBee1966 (talk) 04:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that! OK, done. Xyl 54 (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge, again
Talk:Unearth discography

message: I believe Unearth is about to release a Live DVD entitled, "ALive at the Apocalypse" on March 18th, 2008, as stated on their site, Unearth.tv. I'd like a pro to place this in the article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.9.72 (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live DVD