lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Optimates and populares

message: A discussion about a merger of this article with Optimates is taking place here. T8612 (talk) 13:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Optimates 

message: The article's treatment of Populares broadly disagrees with the stance taken by the Optimates article. Oneor the other should be adjusted-currently swapping between the two is a very jarring conflict of tacks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VineFynn (talk • contribs) 05:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles are being rewritten and will soon be merged. T8612 (talk) 11:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction of Optimates historiography section 

message: Hi, , I want to explain why I reverted your recent edits. Wikipedia has policies against the large-scale lifting of text from copyrighted material, especially if it is quoted in large portions with minimal changes. You added the following:
The section in the eBook version of what you cited is:
These are basically the same and are almost certainly close paraphrasing. This is before the general issue with Ste Croix's book, which is highly tendentious in pushing a Marxist class struggle narrative. This is not longer accepted in the classical scholarship.
I also want to note that it would be preferable to use the same citation style that is common in the document, ie WP:CS1, and also to provide sufficient bibliographic data that it is easily verifiable (viz pages). The original year of the book should also be noted. Ifly6 (talk) 04:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Ifly6, thank you for your clarification. I can understand why you reversed my edit. I was going to add some information in place of that source regarding various Populares proposals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zictor23 (talk • contribs) 12:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi, I removed one of the sources after failing to verify the information thereat. The other lacks relevant pages to verify one way or the other. If you could add pages at  in the template, I would appreciate it. I also am dubious as to its reliability, given its publisher's very lacklustre reputation and the author's not-entirely-strong CV. Ifly6 (talk) 05:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert, 4 June 2023 

message: : The aristocracy of the late republic was that of the nobiles, the people who were patrilineally descended from consuls, and possibly other curule magistrates. These men were contrasted to the novi homines like Cicero. However, status as one or the other played no role in whether they supported or opposed the senate in politics. The Gracchi are as nobilis as they come and opposed the senate in their short careers. Cicero is a novus homo and supported it. Clodius is even more nobilis and alternates between supporting and opposing the senate every year for most of his political career. Roman politicians are opportunistic and have no concrete policy positions on the "popular sovereignty" question: that question is itself an instrument to be manipulated as needed to achieve actual political goals. Ifly6 (talk) 17:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The senate and the nobiles
Talk:Valparai

message: Blocks of text on "History of Valparai" alongwith some texts were removed in accordance with Neutrality, Verifiability and NOR issues. Also, more reliable sources have been added with references.Dilli2040 (talk) 18:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Request added for peer review. Dilli2040 (talk) 04:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review
Talk:The Greek Symbol Mystery

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://books.google.com.au/books?id=wHbfyLGhFZAC&pg=PT2&lpg=PP1&ots=M6VngE2uxY&dq=The+Greek+Symbol+Mystery. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 03:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cushing Daily Citizen

message: It's going to a weekly  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.54.162.23 (talk) 02:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a link to an Editor & Publisher article, but couldn't find anything on whether or not the publication schedule will change, as a previous editor had noted. -  Tobogganoggin talk 03:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  One and a half hours later! Geez, T, are you stalking me? ``` W i k i W i s t a h ``` 04:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Adding... Bwahahaha!! (^_^) -  Tobogganoggin talk 17:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sale / Closure
Talk:Joseph D. Grant County Park

message: Is the directional sign image really necessary? I'm unsure of the guidelines ..Grey3k (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Directional Sign Image 

message: Everywhere I've seen this park mentioned, including at SCC websites, it is referred to as Joseph D. Grant County Park as opposed to "Grant Ranch County Park."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:4100:10E2:998D:EF2D:9925:ED83 (talk) 04:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grant Ranch County Park? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved in the absence of any objections. (non-admin closure)  Colin M (talk) 03:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Grant Ranch County Park →  – Most sources, including their official website calls it "Joseph D. Grant County Park." 206.213.190.64 (talk) 18:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 November 2021
Talk:Veeravanallur

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
122.170.71.4 (talk) 11:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Declined. Coords appear to be correct. If you still think they're wrong, please be more specific about how you think that they're wrong and remove the "tlc|" from the geodata-check tag, above. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 19:08, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Paramathi Velur

message: == "Paramathi Velur ( Namakkal district)" listed at Redirects for discussion ==
 A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Paramathi Velur ( Namakkal district). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Paramathi Velur ( Namakkal district) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Dwarf gulper shark

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Aiguille Blanche de Peuterey

message: What is meant by "serious"? That the mountain is not funny? Can you quote the context in which the source uses this word?  Sandstein  09:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A serious mountain or route is not one that's just difficult to climb. It generally means that it's remote, hard to get to (i.e. broken glacial terrain/distance), full of objective danger (avalanche/rockfall/serac), and hard to get up AND down. It's a recognised term in mountaineering and useful shorthand for all of these qualities. The ABdP qualifies for it in spades in the Alps; other serious peaks might be Mount Logan, K2; a serious route might be Route Major on Mont Blanc or any routes on the Eiger north face. Re the source, Dumler writes that the ABdP "is the hardest and most serious of the four-thousand-metre peaks to reach and then escape from" (p. 193). Ericoides (talk) 12:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks; could we reword this to make clear that the climb to the top is serious and not the mountain itself? Wikipedia is written for laypeople and this looks just weird as it is written.  Sandstein  12:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As I explained, it's not just the climb to the top that's difficult (technically). But please do paraphrase my points above. I do think that the context clarifies what "serious" means and that the term isn't particularly problematic with regard to a mountain that is almost exclusively of interest as a mountaineering objective. To the layman it's simply some random bump on the side of Mont Blanc. Ericoides (talk) 12:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Serious"
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Adopted Topics

message: For the regular collaboration, we may be able to recruit non-wikipedians to help.  For example, the Church planting article was recently adopted by a bunch of blogs  which led to a bunch of experts on the subject contributing.  Maybe we can try to make this a regular thing. Akubhai 14:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regular Collaboration 

message: I suggest we start with Conversion to Christianity.  That seems like a pretty important topic that needs a lot of help. Akubhai 05:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll second that.  Nswinton 13:53, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion
Talk:Vikramasingapuram

message: Madura coats gave support to vickramasingapuram people.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.165.2.82 (talk) 07:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madura coats 

message: Adayakkarunkulam is a small beautiful village located nearby Vickramasingapuram.
It is 4km away from Vickramasingapuram or 5km from Ambasamudram. Nearly 400 families are living here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.150.189.2 (talk) 18:30, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adayakarunkulam 
Talk:Ross seal

message: I rewrote, updated and expanded the article . Material on the Ross seal is somewhat limited - a surprisingly large part of what is known is now covered here - so I went ahead and gave it a status upgrade to "B" within the mammal project.   Best, Eliezg (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Substantial expansion and revisions 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Northern Fur Seal which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Lagrange's theorem (group theory)

message: "Lagrange did not prove his theorem; all he did, essentially, was to discuss some special cases."  This was for a very good reason: the notion of a group did not exist in Lagrange's day.  It was invented by Galois several decades later.  Apparently Lagrange's argument was applicable to groups once they were formulated, so he was given credit for the general theorem.  CharlesTheBold (talk) 13:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical note 

message: "Sylow's theorem extends this to the existence of a subgroup of order equal to the maximal power of any prime dividing the group order."
Really, Sylow's theorem say about any power of prime, not necessarily maximal. 95.104.210.134 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inversion 

message: This section doesn't appear to contain a valid proof, and thus should perhaps be changed to something like 'Outline of Proof...'
This first paragraph says  "If we can show that all cosets of H have the same number of elements..." (the theorem would follow), but it doesn't show that the cosets do in fact have the same number of elements, and so the result is not proved, absent more detail not given in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChengduTeacher (talk • contribs) 13:38, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Proof' Section 

message: Entirely an amateur here, but isn't the 'number of elements' of a group better referred to as its 'cardinality'? 'Order' already seems to be used in more than one way.  It would also allow insertion of a reference to 'Cardinality'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality , and introduce the |H| notation. It also appears that the index is more commonly |G:H| (not [G:H]), see.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_a_subgroup
Captain Puget (talk) 23:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Paragraph
Talk:Walajapet

message: SRI JAYA CARDS
# 24, BAZAAR STREET,
WALAJAPET - 632 513  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.192.164 (talk) 15:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

message: கிருஷ்ணா
ரப்பர் ஸ் டாம்ப்
36 பஜார் வீதி
வாசவி மஹால் எதிரில்
வாலாஜாபேட்டை-632513
வேலூர் மாவட்டம்
Krishna Rubber Stamp
36, Bazaar street,
Opp. Vasavi mahal,
Walajapet-632513
Vellore district.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.75.22 (talk) 14:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krishna Rubber Stamp, Walajapet
Talk:Falluja Precursors

message: This article was created to illustrate the conditions in and around Falluja that contributed to this area becoming more of an 'insurgent hotbed' than others. There are other articles that deal with the area during and after the invasion itself, as well as commentary on those actions.  Please limit suggestions to events and circumstances that would constitute why this area has porportionally created more of a problem than any other city in Iraq. --Bufshof 17:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Yaaradi Nee Mohini

message: {{oldafdfull|page=Yaaradi Nee Mohini|date=23 March 2008|result=keep}
Kerala Distribution Taken By Swarnameghala Entertainers One of the leading distributers of tamil movie  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.1.233.146 (talk) 12:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Atlant-Soyuz Airlines

message: The Aircraft shown in the picture here has a registration starting with VP-B and is thus registered in the Bermudas.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_registration#List_of_countries.2Fregions_and_their_registration_prefixes_and_patterns
for country codes in Aircraft registrations.
I recently saw an Atlant-Soyuz plane registered VQ-BCH, also a Bermuda registration number.
Does anyone know why these Russian planes are registered in the Bermudas?
Is that worth noting in the article?
Gpermant (talk) 18:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Registration in the Bermudas?
Talk:The Just and the Unjust

message: I think the issues around Abner Coates are more central to the novel than the trial itself.  In other words this is not a "courtroom drama".  You wouldn't call "By Love Possesed" a novel about financial wrongdoings and date rape.  Likewise Guard of Honor is not "about" racial discrimination and poor parachute technique.  The incidents are there to show the depth of the people rather than people being described because of the role in the plot.
Peter Reilly (talk) 16:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

message: Robert Basso is the only one of the defendants certified as indigent and provided a public defender (George Stacey). Howell paid Wurts a few hundred dollars to defend him. I don't remember it being mentioned specifically that Leming paid Servadei's firm, but there is a strong implication that this is the case. Servadei is the one who helps Leming agree to testify in order to have his trial severed from that of Howell and Basso. Cozzens make the remark that the money Howell got to pay Wurts likely came from the ransom money obtained from Cohen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.70.100.187 (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Basso has a public defender
Talk:IAero Airways

message: Attempted to edit acquisition news however have been repeatedly re-edited.  I do not waste too much time on wiki, but do seek it to be accurate.  Perhaps someone else has time to battle with the editor seeking to block the news from the Swift Air Website...
"The transaction is not a purchase of one certificate or merger of two certificates"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.40.228 (talk) 16:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing conflict regarding Eastern Air Lines acquisition 
Talk:Child Labor Amendment

message: Although the act, on the part of state legislatures, of "rejecting" a proposed constitutional amendment has no legal recognition, such action does have political ramifications.
What does this mean?  What ramifications? 68.239.116.212 (talk) 08:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is an oblique reference to Coleman v. Miller. Since it is Congress which determines whether an amendment has been validly ratified, it could presumably decide to take rejections into account if it wished. Mahousu (talk) 00:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Political ramifications

message: I'd like to suggest that a map showing ratifications/partial ratifications/rejections/abstentions be included as it has with the Equal Rights Amendment article. Graham1973 (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What are "partial ratifications"? SMP0328. (talk) 23:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Cases where the ratification act passes one house but not the other.Graham1973 (talk) 21:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:The League of Frightened Men

message: When the spine of the book jacket is included in the infobox image, I've sized it at 260 pixels wide instead of 200. — WFinch 13:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image width 

message: Why is the section "Plot introduction" of the article in the present tense? That's asinine and idiotic. Also, the story is in the past tense, and it is a narrative: it is not happening NOW. Please fix the section to the correct tense. Thank you. --Desertphile (talk) 05:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Present tense is customary.  The book, its chapters, and thus its fictional events exist now. —Tamfang (talk) 05:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Present Tense? 

message: I would suggest that "rodomontade," in chapter eight, is even less familiar than viva voce or juridical, actually!  --GLG, 9/3/09  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.152.94.132 (talk) 11:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfamiliar to whom?  Few of these so-called "unfamilar words" are unfamiliar to me.  Unless there is a source (and if there is, it hasn't been cited) that Stout deliberately used words he considered "unfamiliar" in just this way, then this statement of "The unfamiliar word" is entirely subjective.  That means it is original research, has no place here, and the similarly named sections must be removed from all of the Nero Wolfe articles. 12.233.146.130 (talk) 20:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfamiliar word 

message: I read this thirty years ago and recently got to wondering: Is this the one in which Archie repeatedly sees a man (dubbed "Pinky" by Archie for something he wears) with a gold tooth, who only eats soup? (If you like, answer on my Talk page and then delete this section.) —Tamfang (talk) 06:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The little runt! Yes, this is the one — he's one of the men watching Paul Chapin. —WFinch (talk) 18:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinky 

message: In a later book, Archie quotes Ferdinand Bowin's words when he was taken from his cell to be executed by electric chair.  (I think the words are, "I find the idea utterly repugnant.")  If anybody knows which book it is, it might make a good addition to the page.  JDZeff (talk) 19:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later reference to this book
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Columbia University

message: :Category:Union Theological Seminary (New York City) has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Graham (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Union Theological Seminary (New York City)]] has been nominated for discussion
Talk:Falls Church News-Press

message: I'm pretty sure that Benton just buys Thomas' and Beson's columns, should they really still be on the page?
:If they're syndicated then I don't think they should be included. Do we have any source for this?  ·:·Will Beback  ·:· 04:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm hard pressed to find anything of "encyclopedic" value here.  This entry seems geared toward sending advertisers to the FCNP.  Disagreements?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HAJ1300 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertorial? 
Talk:The Memory Keeper's Daughter

message: I suggest that we move the stuff about the film out of the "Plot" section and into the "Adaptation" section and leave the original plot intact, rather than conflating it with the film plot. Alex McKee (talk) 15:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film stuff
Talk:Beth Garmai

message: The region is historically better known as Beth Garmai (1,110 hits on google books) or Beth Garme (288 hits on google books) or Beth Garmaï etc..., while Garmian counts for a mere 205 in google books. However the last term have been lately publicised by the Kurdish parties of Iraq as seen from a general google search.--Rafy talk 20:49, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I will proceed with moving since no one objected.--Rafy talk 16:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  page move 
Talk:Hasanwayhids

message: *"Hasanwayhid dynasty" -Llc 4
*"Hasanwayhids" -Llc 35
*"Hasanwayhid" -Llc 17
Takabeg (talk) 23:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

message: A relatively new source on this dynasty is 'Hasanwayh b. Husayn al-Kurdi: From freehold castles to vassality?' by Jürgen Paul. Additionally, some extra information from the Sharafnama:
* Some members of the dynasty are missing in this article, it actually goes: Hasanywayh -> Badr ibn Hasanwayh -> Hilal ibn Badr -> Tahir ibn Hilal -> Badr ibn Tahir (ibn Hilal).
* Failure to capture Castle of 'Kusced' by Badr ibn Hasanwayh in 1015, and involvement of the Juzkan ('Cuzqan') tribe. 
Znertu (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources