Wikipedia talk:Template index/User namespace

message: __TOC__
I'm creating multi-licensing templates with spellings in non-American English. I'm doing this as I'm all for spelling diversity on wikipedia and would prefer to have UK English on my UserPage. I am advised that it makes no difference legally. Rather than clog up this page I intend to link to a sub-page containing the templates though. Any thoughts? adamsan  17:58, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a perfect plan to me.  No objections here.  – Ram-Man (comment) (talk) 19:50, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
The various Wikipedia licences were removed. I've added them back. Please give a reason if you have a problem. Thanks, Alphax τεχ 15:34, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

message: I'd like to create some templates similar to babel for user to display what hobbies they have sports, etc.
Could someone point me to where I should start ? And if someone would want to contribute ?
:There is a template called Template:Userbox, which gives an empty babel-like template for filling in. I have kept a gallery of it's use on my page but I have added some extra information here to make it more known. NSR (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Create template similar to babel for hobbies 

message: I've noticed that people often misuse the Shared IP box by adding in explanatory information (ie, ). I've created a specialised template for ISPs that includes such information automatically. The above use is thus reduced to , resulting in a much more viewer-friendly message. See: Template:ISP. // Pathoschild 01:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ISP notice

message: Is there a template that one can put on their userpage to denote that they are busy in real life and can't come to the computer right now?--Akako|☎ 22:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Busy

message: I created :Image:Octagon-warning.png () that I could add to templates containing serious messages.  I initially put it into the "Candidates for Speedy Deletion" templates, but it quickly got removed from them.  When I later checked up on this graphic, I noticed it was being used in a "user is blocked" message, so I decided to endeavour towards making :Image:Octagon-warning.png the de facto standard graphic to denote the act of blocking a user for bad conduct.  I applied this graphic to the , , , and  templates repeatedly, but it kept getting removed.
I figured that since :Image:Stop hand.png () was getting a bit too cliché, I thought I would add something new to Wikipedia's house style, but I am running into some significant opposition to this.  I could use some extra opinions.  Denelson83  07:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the proposed changes are under dispute and encountering opposition, I've reverted to the old icons until we gain consensus. I oppose changing to the new icon; the existing icons are clearer and less ambiguous, in my opinion. --Muchness 16:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Less ambiguous?  In this context, the "stop hand" would refer to a temporary condition, not a permanent one, as if to say "whoa!"  The cross would mean "you had your chance."  Denelson83  16:41, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I associate a cross with a process/technical problem rather than a user conduct issue. --Muchness 16:59, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree that a graded sequence of icons indicating increasingly severe warnings is a good idea. --Muchness 21:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Block" messages - which icon? 

message: Created by my want of a suitable template (if you like it, I'll make it a template, something like  - or suggest a better name):
	
	This user is currently experiencing health issues that may affect his or her ability to work on Wikipedia. Please bear in mind that these issues may temporarily affect this user's ability to carry out their usual Wikipedia duties. This user may not consequently be able to respond to talk page messages or e-mails in a timely manner during affected periods, and your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Please let me know what you think.
—    natha(?)nrdotcom (T • C • W) 04:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New template for your consideration. 

message: I noticed that this page is included in all the categories that come with the templates displayed here. Any way to prevent this, as this is definitely not a user page? — SheeEttin {T/C} 20:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: I realized (or at least could not find) templates similar to the Graphics abilities boxes on Commons. I'm currently importing the templates form common so we have the same sets for consistency. Pr0phacy 23:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of templates for Graphics Abilities like Commons? 

message: Please add this template (as I'm not sure how)
Microchip08 14:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Template 

message: One that was created some time ago and one I just created today. Helpful with IPsock administrative stuff.
Would like to see them added to the list if ok. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 17:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Couple more templates 

message: I removed the barnstar general and barnstar topical templates as these seemed to already be included in the remaining barnstar category template. This fixed the problem of the Barnstar categories repeating twice on the page, but I am posting this here in case someone more familiar with this page (and the barnstars) recognizes a problem with this fix. Thx, -- caveman80(my 2 cents) 08:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempt to fix the Barnstars repeating problem 

message: I've shamelessly stolen some text another user uses (unfortunately I forget who it was) to educate people who misuse the user page, as I find the current warning to be vague. The changes are at . Comments? Should I edit the uw-userpage template to be this? It shows up as:
 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline.  It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia; as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:
* an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
* a workspace for a draft article
* a personal website, blog, or social media site
* a space for self-promotion or other advertising
* a CV/resumé
* a lengthy autobiography
The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you.  — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved this discussion to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Templates#Proposal_to_improve_uw-userpage_template. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to improve uw-userpage template