lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ab Box

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. —KGV 09:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Aba Bayefsky

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. —KGV 09:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:List of military operations on the Eastern Front of World War II

message: "British plans to attack, invade and wage war against the USSR." With allies like that :). I think that this can't be listed as allies before the fact of alliance between UK and USSR.--Mrg3105 (talk) 11:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allies?! 

message: The list, List of Axis named operations in the European Theatre, was created in late 2008. It substantially covers the same ground as the List of World War II military operations (and its subsidiaries) although there are omissions in both. A merger is desirable to avoid duplication of effort and to maintain a single reference source. The "List of World War II military operations" family is the more established of the two (created 2006 as a result of reorganisation of a yet older list), more complete, more organised and should be the single source. Folks at 137 (talk) 09:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: The list of offensives should really be organized by timeline for ease of use. CessnaMan1989 (talk) 23:52, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline
Talk:Geertgen tot Sint Jans

message: At the moment he is born ca.1465, but his master Ouwater died in 1475, according to his article. The Getty also have him born ca. 1460  Johnbod (talk) 16:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we need a more founded estimate, maybe Johann Kessler's dissertation mentions this too? – Ilse@ 22:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Getty is highly sourced with the latest info - see the references they quote. But I accept the Dutch museums & Reinhart collection thought he went to ca. 1495.  Johnbod (talk) 22:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose the dates for A(e)lbert van Ouwater won't be more accurate either... – Ilse@ 22:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Getty have him "active" to 1465 too. Johnbod (talk) 23:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: I think the portrait of a woman from the painting The Holy Kinship should not be used as a portrait of the man Geertgen tot Sint Jans. I believe there is a portrait of Geertgen tot Sint Jans in the municipal archives of the city of Haarlem, that could be used to replace this image. – Ilse@ 20:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait image 
Talk:Georg von Peuerbach

message: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/454669/Georg-von-Peuerbach
http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Biographies/Peurbach.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=Bmcpsgp-Ml4C&pg=PA165&lpg=PA165&dq=georg+von+peuerbach+history&source=bl&ots=u4eCqXHT8n&sig=Ot5CGuYyMYOB4dpOPkXr-t2flFg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wjMBU8vuBKS6yAG36ICADg&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q=georg%20von%20peuerbach%20history&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=IIfYHTZ3p3gC&pg=PA264&lpg=PA264&dq=georg+von+peuerbach+history&source=bl&ots=owFafr3gMn&sig=U_ixZ52gY592_Wz9J2uAJ76oHf4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wjMBU8vuBKS6yAG36ICADg&ved=0CDsQ6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=georg%20von%20peuerbach%20history&f=false
http://nrich.maths.org/6908
Logo Aesthesis (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography for future edits

message: I have been investigating the claims that Purbach has invented the Jacob's staff.  I have noted that several sources refer to the development as deriving from Ptolemy's triquetrum.  This leads me to believe that the instrument is not a cross-staff but a completely different instrument.  I'm going to continue to look into this.
So many things have been given the name "Jacob's Staff" that it can not be used as a conclusive pointer to any one thing.  Michael Daly 21:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacob's Staff a different instrument? 

message: The article has seen fairly significant edits and overall has improved as a result. There are still some issues with the lead though. It does little to highlight Peuerbach's relevance and significant achievements. There are some issues with citations in the last paragraph of Works as well. -- Josh.vill (talk) 00:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! I worked on making the article more digestible but am open to suggestion as needed  Sartor01 (talk) 05:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Review of Recent edits

message: — Assignment last updated by Patt0400 (talk) 18:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Science to Newton
Talk:Abram Bergson

message: This article makes some popular but flatly false assertions.  Bergson didn't actually dispense with strongly cardinal utility.  He claimed that errors of interpersonal would cancel-out, which is a gibberish claim if utility doesn't have an underlying strong cardinality. —SlamDiego←T 01:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong 
Talk:Abram Chayes

message: I have a conflict of interest, but would a filmed interview with Abram Chayes from 1986 be useful here as an outside link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. Transcript is available. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_859E050541464AFAACAFBFF2EDB271EE Mccallucc (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  OK to add outside link? 
Talk:George of Poděbrady

message: somebody needs to correct [some vandalism] I don't have time to do it somebody please fix that  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.164.74.131 (talk) 13:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you fixed the problem, thanks. I put a warning on the vandal's talk page and refactored your above comment because there is no reason to keep a record of the vandalism. Johnuniq (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

text: He was leader of the Hussites.
No, he wasn’t. The Hussite wars have already ended (1434) when he started to be politically relevant (most likely 1448 or a bit earlier, but not much) and the term “Hussites” was irrelevant afterwards. If the term “Hussites” means anything, than it was a coalition of various anti-Catholic groups in a coalition, but this coalition fall apart shortly after the end of the Hussite wars. George of Poděbrady was actually more a leader trying to hold together ALL various parties in the Czech kingdom (including Catholics for example) which however were more or less fighting one with another.
Ceplm (talk) 13:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem

message: According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_titles#Foreign_names_and_anglicization non-translated names should be used. Therefore, IMHO, this article should be renamed to “Jiří z Poděbrad” (with a redirect from George of Podebrady) Ceplm (talk) 11:37, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the article
Talk:George VII of Georgia

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 17:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Among historians, there has been an opinion for a long time that George VII did not die in battle.
Source: Tavadze, L. (2008) About the reasons of Georgian King George VII death, Studies in the Middle Ages History of Georgia, vol. IX. p. 41-45   Ivane Javakhishvili Institute of History and Ethnology  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.3.83.160 (talk) 12:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: PDF 149.3.83.160 (talk) 12:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The article should mention the opinion that George VII did not die in battle

message: I noticed that there are some contributions by an IP that were taken from one source () after seeing it flag at copypatrol, so I rephrased that section. The same IP seems to have contributed additional substantial paragraphs based on print sources that I do not have access to in these two edits, and the tone is very much like that of history books, so I'm adding a CV-Unsure tag as a precaution. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Several sources need to be checked:  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:16, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CV-Unsure
Talk:Gianfrancesco I Gonzaga, Marquis of Mantua

message: Why is he Francesco in the title and Gianfrancesco in the article?  I notice that he was preceded by Francesco I Gonzaga; if he is also Francesco, that would make him Francesco II.  That makes me wonder if Gianfrancesco is correct.  I was looking to refine the alphabetization on the Category page for the family.  But I'm not sure what to do with this.  72.83.149.134 (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Francesco or Gianfrancesco? 
Talk:List of Hayate the Combat Butler episodes

message: The article needs to be split. Also before the split, does anyone have a reference about the English airdates and what title they used for the episodes, where they aired, who dubbed them, and etc? DragonZero (talk) 05:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why this needs to be split as I don't believe having two separate lists would be helpful when it can all be kept in one place.--十八 05:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 
Talk:Giovanni Aurispa

message: My edit was reverted because "the italian nation was born before the unified state", this is a specific nationalist perspective on history. To say that a subject of the Kingdom of Sicily was actually "Italian" is revisionist, as it attempts to apply modern perspectives of ethnic identity into the past. The first Italian dictionary would be published in 1612, 153 years after his death. He worked in Latin and Greek. Arguably you could always call the Italian Peninsula as a geographic concept "Italy", but in this case Sicily is not part of the peninsula. This is akin to calling Jesus 'An Israeli Religious Figure', it's anachronistic.Paolorausch (talk) 05:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ethnically Italians even if politically divided they represent a pretty homogeneous ethnic group. There are sociological studies which confirm it. Here nobody is nationalist, so be less aggressive and read the sources.--93.36.0.14 (talk) 07:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, I apologise if you believed I was calling *you* a nationalist. That was not my intent, and I apologise. The idea of invalidating a group's ethnic identity and forcing the acceptance of an national identity is nationalist. Italy's official policy of treating romance minority languages as "Dialects" is also nationalist. I understand and respect your opinion. But I'm not accepting it as a consensus opinion as you're presenting it. How do we constructively reach a consensus that we can both agree on that acknowledges both of our perspectives? Paolorausch (talk) 09:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

text: No, I disagree. Italian automatically includes Sicilian. It is like saying French and Parisian or German and Berliner. Synthesis is important in these matters.--Walter J. Rotelmayer (talk) 15:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Giovanni di Bicci de' Medici

message: There seems to be an error in this article.  Pope John XXIII (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_John_XXIII) is a 20th century pope.  When Giovanni di Medici was around there was an Antipope John XXIII (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipope_John_XXIII).  But the Antipope never returned to Rome so it would be impossible for Giovanni to have received any favors.
I have changed the article somewhat to reflect this error, but I have no idea which Pope (if any) conferred favors on Giovanni.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morlesg (talk • contribs) 23:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pope John XXIII 
Talk:Gjon Kastrioti

message: Like many other articles, which have been extensively edited by the same group of banned editors and socks most of the article's content is an unintelligible mess of bad use of bibliography and an even worse understanding of basic historiography. The cleanup will take about a week or so.--Maleschreiber (talk) 05:41, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: Gjon Kastrioti did not die in Hilandar on May 2 or 9, 1437, because he was alive on May 28 or March 28, 1438, see Jireček, Konstantin, Geschichte der Serben, Vol.: 2,1, 1371 - 1537, Gotha, 1918, p. 183: "Gjon Kastriot was still alive in March 1438: Ljubić 9, 214 and Jorga 3, 33. Two Serbian notes, however, give the date of death as Thursday, May 2 or 9, 1437 (6945): Stojanović, Zapisi 1, no. 270-271." He died some were in before July 7, 1439 Ungjited (talk) 14:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ljubić Listine, 9, has it as: "XXVIII, mai 1438", while Jorga Notes, 3, has it as: "28 mars 1438". Probably the correct one is Jorga's, since he publishes the actual source. Ungjited (talk) 15:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  For my edits
Talk:Armée de l'air de l'Armistice

message: This page is full of factual errors. Let us sum up the main ones:
* there never was an organization known as the "Armée de l'air de l'armistice". After the Armistice between France and the Axis powers, the Armée de l'air simply continued to exist, with a reduced strenght, until mid-November 1942 where (1) units in mainland France were disbanded, (2) units in North Africa and most other colonies (Indochina excluded) sided with the Allies and later merged with the Free French
* the Germans never provided the Armée de l'air during the armistice period with any kind of equipment, especially not with captured French planes, which they kept for their own use or gave away to their allies like Italy, Finland or Bulgaria
* the Armée de l'air did not operate over Iraq in WWII (the Luftwaffe did, from bases in Nothern Iraq, using Vichy bases in Syria on the way)
* Even when it operated against the Allies, the Armée de l'air never operated side-by-side with the Axis powers
* The list of plane types includes several types that were retired from service long before the Armistice
PpPachy 21:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hayden Epstein

message: According to this source Epstein was a two-time finalist for both the Lou Groza and Ray Guy Awards. However, according to Michigan's 2008 yearbook he was only a Guy finalist in 2000. Was Scout.com confused on the difference between finalist and candidate?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award finalist 

message: I see that Epstein has an elaborate bio at this website. I find it to be slightly inaccurate in places.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio 

message: Some sources say Epstein was affiliated with the Hamburg Sea Devils in 2006. Can't find any WP:RS though.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamburg Sea Devils 
Talk:Adeeb

message: Given the date that this article was started, that it was written in its entirety from the outset, and the word for word similarity to this page (http://www.dawn.com/weekly/images/archive/060604/images6.htm) which pre-dates it, the article may be a copyright violation. At the very least, it was copied from another page, and retains its unencyclopedic tone. 99.149.84.135 (talk) 22:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyright violation
Talk:The Action

message: Throughout the article the song "I'll keep on holding on" (performed by The Action) is confused with "I'll keep holdin on" (performed by The Marvelletes). As far as I am aware, The Action never performed the latter song.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.168.11.172 (talk) 10:09, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have trimmed the biographical information (birthdate, death-date, place of birth, place of death were relevant!) that seemed to have been added for every member of the band.  The jamming in of this material made the page largely unreadable and I think it not directly relevant, as this is a band page and not a page on each of those members. I have left the info there, commented out, if someone can think of a way of properly, elegantly integrating it. In addition the info was all unsourced anyway. Verlaine76 (talk) 14:18, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimmed biographical information
Talk:Michael Jonzun

message: Dear Gentlemen,
I am the original author of the biographical information that I submitted for print on Wikpedia for Michael Jonzun, and I am the same author & website builder of www.AuditionRadio.com who wrote the "MICHAEL JONZUN BIOGRAPHY" as found on [www.Auditionradio.com] under the subpage  
Michael Jonzun is my husband, and website owner of www.AuditionRadio.com. And all copyrights belong to us and his company Boston Int'l Music, Inc. You have our (Michael Johnson, aka Michael Jonzun, aka M. Johnson, Cheryl Levittan-Jonzun aka Cheryl Levittan, and Boston Int'l Music, Inc.)permission to print, re-print, and distribute the information specifically submitted to you on the "Michael Jonzun" biography.
Sincerely,
Cheryl Levittan-Jonzun
Audition Radio
A Division of Boston Int'l Music, Inc.
www.AuditionRadio.com
: When you post material to Wikipedia, you need to release it under a GFDL licence. If you consent to this, please e-mail info-en@wikimedia.org and we will note the release of this material and permit it's future inclusion. We will also need to ask you to refrain from editing the pages as you appear to have a conflict of interest, we try very very hard to keep Wikipedia as neutral as possible so prefer if some unconnected editor was to edit the article, also, it must be in keeping with our manual of style, also if you have any images you are prepared to release under a GFDL licence, please don't hesitate to contact us and upload an image. Kind Regards, -- Nick t 23:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Henry Chichele

message: I have added a significant block of text, taken from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article, on the educational foundations. However it seems to overbalance the rest of the article. I kept most of the text on St Bernard's College and Higham Ferrers, but feel free to create new articles. I truncated the details on All Souls, which could be included in its own section; again, feel free. David Brooks (talk) 17:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional text on educational institutions
Talk:The Adicts

message: This article needs more references, so I have done some searching and found some that could be used for verification of existing info or possibly new info.  I'm posting the links here in case someone has the chance to use them before I do.
1) March 2009 interview with Keith Warren by Serbian magazine:
http://www.balkanrock.com/index.php/Intervjui/Keith-Monkey-Warren-The-Adicts-All-the-lucky-people.html
2) July 2010 interview with Keith Warren with Ventura County Star:
http://www.vcstar.com/news/2010/jul/01/a-monkey-in-a-bowler-hats-off-to-newbury-park-as/
3) Bios:
http://www.allmusic.com/artist/the-adicts-p15298
http://www.chicagogigs.com/concerts/the-adicts-tickets.htm  
http://yourpunk.com/bands/a/adicts.html
Robman94 (talk) 04:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Hermann II, Count of Celje

message: This so-called portrait of Herman II. Celjski is a sketch after a 17th century portrait representing a nobleman of baroque era . If a Celjski portrait was actually intended by the artist, this picture is not an authentic one. With respect to authenticity the contemporary drawing from Richenthal's chronicles should be used [as already done in http://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_II_Celjski]. Unfortunately this portrait of an armoured knight is faceless.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.226.110.98 (talk) 11:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This mentioned image is not at Commons. Can you upload it there, perhaps? --xJaM (talk) 23:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I am surprised it took six years to implement such a reasonable and well-argumented suggestion. Surtsicna (talk) 23:56, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hongxi Emperor

message: What does Hongxi means?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.40.49.207 (talk) 19:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of reign name 

message: (1) I cannot edit due to VPN usage and my location in Asia
(2) Request an "In Popular Culture" section with the following notation:
Portrayed by Liang Guan Hua in the 2019 Chinese television series Ming Dynasty.
Portrayed by Hong Jian Tao in the 2022 Chinese television series Royal Feast (link: Royal_Feast).
Note: reference taken from page for Empress_Hu_(Xuande) Hetshepsuit (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Lynette and Lyonesse

message: I could get behind that. Ha. Silly me.
Though actually, I'm not sure why the main article for Lynette is a video game character.  Surely Tennyson is a teense more notable than Soul Calibur? —Mhari* 22:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: Where in England does Lynette the main character live? 200.124.43.83 (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuestión 1
Talk:List of process music pieces

message: There doesn’t seem to be any explanation of process music in this list, and the link to Process music seems awkward. I think there ether needs to be an abbreviated discussion of process music at the top of this page or the two should be merged. S.dedalus 22:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Hyacinth 22:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge?
Talk:Air Traffic

message: Air Traffic sent an email today saying that they were no longer with EMI; this should be changed if anyone else can back it up.
11gardir (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I got this email today, i don't have a source yet - but i'm sure it'll come up pretty soon on their website. --SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 16:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Label

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect air traffic. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 
-- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "{{noredirect|air traffic}}" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 
Talk:Flowered Up

message: I'm not sure they actually "signed to" London Records. Heavenly had a distribution deal with London for a time and Flowered Up were part of that. -88.109.254.28 12:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Flowered Up tried to re-form in 2007, but Dorney refused, and the planned reunion tour was cancelled."
In my memory *Flowered Up* briefly reunited in the early 2000's, but it didn't work out.  Something like Tim Dorney insisting that Liam got off the drugs, it worked for a bit, but then he relapsed and Tim walked away?  Now, I've got no references for this and I don't know where I heard/read it, so I absolutely cannot add it to the article.  However, if anyone finds a reference I think it would be an important addition, as it puts Dorney's refusal to reform again in 2007 in a very different light, and gives some indication of the troubles Liam was having that would later lead to his death. Cfmdobbie (talk) 13:28, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This article indicates that in 2001 Liam was clean, and they reformed as "Greedy Soul", but broke up after some issues with their manager; also that they reformed again in 2005 but it was Joe's problem with drugs that caused them to break up again.  So it sounds like they had two reformations prior to the attempt in 2007.  Not sure how to or even whether to try and integrate this with the page. Cfmdobbie (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformed in 2002/2003-ish? 