lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Knowledge management system

message: :Artificial Intelligence Systems
:* Expert systems
:* Neural nets
:* Fuzzy logic
:* Generic algorithms
:* Intelligent agents
--Pinnecco 20:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Capture Knowledge

message: Should this page be merged with the Knowledge management entry?  At the very least, the two should be linked.  Jackvinson
: I think you are right Jack.  It has always been a weak set of assertions and no effort is being put in to its improvements (other than more assertions).  What do other people think?  Merging it would make a lot of sense.  --Snowded 08:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  How about we merge it?  It has just been moved, no one has done anything with it.   If anyone objects speak now or I will merge it over the weekend  --Snowded (talk) 20:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with KM? 

message: I have in the absence of any objection formalised the merger proposal.  I propose to take some of the text and references into the KM page either in existing sections or possibly a new section.  Any objections?  --Snowded (talk) 07:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that Knowledge management has been rewritten, do we merge this with KM, or delete it? Or do the parts that are software-specific (the taxonomy listed above in the talk), should they go with Knowledge management software ...? Harvey the rabbit (talk) 03:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  My vote stays for merge and the KM software section is best  --Snowded TALK 18:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Concur, I would support a merger to Knowledge management software Harvey the rabbit (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm happy with that --Snowded (talk) 14:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK this has been around for a long time - any objections or can we set up the merge?  --Snowded TALK  08:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Be bold, merge JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 13:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with everyone who suggest that the two pages should be merged.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.224.147.181 (talk) 17:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:The Flirts

message: It seems remiss to have an article about The Flirts without mentioning Bobby Orlando, who wrote and produced all their material, plus played most of the instruments.  --63.25.0.46 20:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bric-à-brac

message: Could someone please source the 'DEVASTATED BRIC-A-BRAC' reference?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nmclaughlin (talk • contribs) 2006-09-14T21:21:14
: It's advertising. I removed it. Zora 21:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Headline text][[''Link title'']]
Talk:Frank Haege

message: I think maybe this should go through an AfD instead of being prodded. WP:BIO says Sportspeople/athletes who have played in a fully professional league and since the arena league team's he was the head coach for are included in Wikipedia I would say that he would qualify in this way. I feel there is sufficient imformation available to expand this article as well such as including this link and some bio from it . I guess I am open to debate on this one and that is why I think perhaps an AfD is the way to go... let's see if others think I am nuts or maybe agree with some expansion of the article. -- DrunkenSmurf 20:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So far, the article states he exists and has had two jobs.  This is not particularly notable.  As the prod stated, you merely have to include enough information to change this condition.  JMcC 07:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Prod
Wikipedia talk:Tendentious editors/Merger proposal

message: This is an initial attempt at merging Wikipedia:Tendentious editors and Wikipedia:Expert Retention/Burden of proof.  Still needs work:
Issues, as I see it:
* One contradiction needs resolving--how much dispute resolution is needed before blocking/banning may be imposed?  Under ER/BoP, very little; under TE, some dispute resolution must be had, and some formal warnings issued, before blocks may occur.
* This policy appears to formally introduce some element of stare decisis into Wikipedia editing.  While I in general support article stability--ties should often go to the current version--this might be a sufficiently substantial change.  Perhaps I'm interpreting it incorrectly.
* As it stands, it's a bit wordy and can be trimmed quite a bit.
--EngineerScotty 20:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps with an African swallow. ;) Durova 02:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or was that a European swallow? --EngineerScotty 15:50, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, wait, I don't know that! AAAAAaaaaaarrrggghhhh! >Radiant< 13:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I guess the one thing I'd like to see before editors resort to the admin noticeboard is some impartial feedback at a disputed page.  I'd be willing to jettison the warning templates and other stuff, but the key to getting this into practical form seems to be WP:RFC or WP:3O.  Otherwise the admin noticeboard is likely to get cluttered with frivolous requests.  Does that sound fair? Durova 02:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the merger 

message: Tweaked the rationale slightly, mainly to remove reference to normal editors and hence make less divisive  Viv Hamilton 07:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tweaking 

message: Something that didn't make it over from BoP (because it wasn't explicit) was that the offender should be considered banned from editing the article (but not its talk page) until the dispute is resolved. I propose this on the principle that the article should remain stable while the issue is being pursued, rather than being used as a battleground. This would be a community-enforced ban, with blocking being used for those who won't honor the principle. Mangoe 23:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial ban 

message: I intend to take a back seat on the merger process.  Mainly I'm concerned that my edits to Wikipedia:Tendentious editors may have been perceived as overly aggressive and inadvertently divisive.  A lot of editors have input here and I may have already had my share.  Unless it's specifically stated to me that my perception is mistaken, I'll offer a few comments and let other editors hammer this out. Durova 06:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treading on eggshells
Talk:Van Zant (duo)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:25, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 April 2021 

message: : When this page was still called  Van Zant, Maxim protected it with the edit commentary "Pagemove war [move=sysop]" at 20:35, 10 September 2008. Cheers CapnZapp (talk) 19:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  move protection
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Derry Brownfield

message: Keep Yeah he is a "non-notable" radio host to those that dont care about agraculture issues in flyover country or dont eat food raised on farms? Who gets to decide who is notable? He has been on radio for over 20some years longer that several other hosts with articles that probably dont have the "horse sence" of a mule (or some other Derry-like expression)
Is there a limited number of 1's and zeroes at wikipedia? (well not as limited as it used to be) 
Keep A google search pulled up an article on worldnetdaily.com Posted: October 11, 1999 that says his radio show is nationally syndicated. I also found many other hits for him. KarateLadyKarateLady 20:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pole–zero plot

message: How bout Pole-zero plots in Continuous Time?
Mykeknauff 20:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Why is it b_0 + b_1 s + b_2 s^2?  Isn't it more usual to write b_0 s^2 + b_1 s + b_2?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.72.124 (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  order of coefficients
Talk:Seasonal food

message: should this be merged with Seasonal_food_calendar_%28Northern_Hemisphere%29
Is this article suitable for wikipedia?  I think an encyclopedia article about Seasonal food might include a few examples to demonstrate what the concept means, but that appears to be all that this article consists of.  Perhaps this should be retitled "List of Seasonal food", with the same subcategories for seasons? johnpseudo 21:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideally this article should be expanded so that the list of seasonal food would appear either as one of the sections of the article or as a seperate page, but it's still a stub at the moment. Phonemonkey 21:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is hillarious. The articles that link to seasonal have NOTHING to do with food!!!! Peter Horn 01:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevent redirect
Category talk:Companies based in California

message: what is the purpose of dividing up these companies by county? Wouldn't it be better to divide them up by industry?   Hmains 06:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  by county  

message: Companies should be not under econmony. IMHO, they are more relevant than to be buried like that. --evrik (talk) 22:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hierarchy
Talk:Warrior Rock: Toyah on Tour

message: Lewismaster (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

message: I may have to check the claims that the CD version is abridged a bit more thoroughly: admittedly it's quite some time since I've listened to my vinyl copies, but I can't really spot what's missing from the CD apart from the audience shouting a lot at the end of Ieya.  If anyone else has a better idea (or can refute the "abridged" claim) then please update the article accordingly!—Chris (blather • contribs • e)  20:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abridged?
Talk:List of Hi-de-Hi! episodes

message: Episode list moved from main Hi-de-Hi page. Bob talk 21:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, I've selected you on the basis that you have all added content rather than just gnoming and reverting. I'm hoping that one of you knows enough about these episodes to fix up the inconsistencies here. The table at Series overview contains a "TBA" cell, which surely can't be right, and the table as a whole doesn't seem to tally with the subsections for the individual series. If you open up that table for editing, it has blocks like: 
| color8       = #99CCFF
| link8        = List of Hi-de-Hi! episodes#Series Eight (1987–1988)
| episodes9    = 6
| start8       = 
| end8         = 
 notice the numbering of the parameters: 8-8-9-8-8. Also the links don't agree with the names of the subsections. I've tried working out which edits have introduced problems, but there have been a great many edits by anons, some probably beneficial. For example, were  correct or not? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks to me like the edit you mention above is where the issue seems to have appeared - I'm assuming they're run series 3 and 4 together as in terms of broadcasts, they followed one another to make what must have seemed a long series. In terms of production, though, I imagine they are classed as separate. I'd be tempted to revert that edit and see if that fixes the other issues. Bob talk 21:18, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the DVD releases identify these as two separate series production-wise and this is how the show's episodes are set out in the IMDb guide. Series 3 ends with the episode 'Stripes' (first broadcast 5 December 1982) and Series 4 begins with the episode 'Co-respondent's course' first broadcast 12 December 1982. Niki2006 (talk) 22:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies within the page
Talk:Aleksandr Burago

message: IIRC there is a monument to a Captain Burago somewhere in Bulgaria, where the Russian Imperial Army officer by this name took some city (or a fortress) from the Turks with a tiny force, following a joking suggestion to do so from his superior, which Burago had chosen to take seriously and then staged a completely unexpected victorious attack. Sorry I don't recall neither details nor the officer's name. --BACbKA 20:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this, there is indeed a monument of Burago in the Plovdiv City Garden. There is also a street in the city named after him. Todor→Bozhinov 13:40, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

text: No, sorry, I live in Pleven, which is some 200 km to the north across the Balkan Mountains :) I don't think I would visit Plovdiv in the next few months, although if I do I may photograph the monument (I know where the city garden is) with my VGA-camera mobile phone (I don't have anything better for now, unfortunately). Todor→Bozhinov 16:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Captain Burago?

message: I'm confused about the first name. The external links I put in the initial stub revision seem to disagree as well... --BACbKA 10:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, they seem to disagree, but it seems like Alexander is more popular. At least the Bulgarian sources mention him as Alexander unanimously . Todor→Bozhinov 16:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First name: Aleksandr or Constantin?!

message: It seems that the discrepancy of the dates given by the various sources stems from two things:
# old/new style dates (this explains the difference between 4th and 16th of January)
# when the order was given and when Plovdiv was considered fallen (the latter seems to have happened in 1AM) — thus the difference between the 15th and 16th
--BACbKA 19:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date discrepancy
Talk:Tando Allahyar

message: EX-CADET ASADALI KHUWAJA(0413),MUZAMIL AKBER JARWAR(O481) belongs to the soil of Tando Allahyar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.68.108.235 (talk) 11:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  EX-CADETS  FROM CADET COLLEGES
Talk:World Wide Name

message: Please take a look at the specs on this link... it has better explanation but needs to be verified and have permission from the original author (Chris Evans) before putting the same info in this page.
http://www.techworld.com/storage/features/index.cfm?featureid=156&pagtype=samecatsamechan
----
This article doesn't say what a WWID or World Wide Name is used for within the network.  Endpoints, resources, or what?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.186.110.146 (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The answer to that is pretty much "yes".  I tried to clear that up.(71.233.167.118 (talk) 03:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

message: This article uses "U/L" three times but does not explain what that means. 96.26.79.253 (talk) 13:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See MAC_address#Address_details. They are the "unicast" and "local" bits in the MAC address. Don't know how to describe or link it appropriately… --RokerHRO (talk) 10:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What does U/L mean?

message: I see no indication from the SCSI Primary Commands, SCSI Block Commands, or Serial Attached SCSI references indicating that it is required. CTRL+F does not find a single reference to it. This page is misleading. FC does appear to have it supported, and ATA has it, but SCSI does not use this terminology at all. It has optional support for the WWN formats described in this page, but it is not required by the specification 
SAS:
https://www.seagate.com/staticfiles/support/disc/manuals/Interface%20manuals/100293071c.pdf
SPC-5: 644 on describe the Device Identification page, but it does **not** mention this is a WWN.
http://www.t10.org/cgi-bin/ac.pl?t=f&f=spc5r22.pdf
Rattard (talk) 16:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do SAS drives actually use WWNs?
Talk:Southern District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod

message: I am removing the extended list of congregations & missions.  I certainly see the value of an article on a middle judicatory for a major american denomination, but not for the directory style list. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  19:12, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOTDIR]] 
Talk:Gestalt theoretical psychotherapy

message: This article needs to be made more accessible for a general audience.  It is not really clear to someone with a basic understanding of the principles of psychology, let alone, a completely general audience. Dwinetsk 17:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . I was wondering why you wanted a use a source from 1963. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

message: Tskinner11 (talk) 18:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: {Notes}

message: The article does not present in what way and how much Gestalt theoretical psychotherapy borrowed from Gestalt therapy, theory and practice. Gestalt threapy was developed long before Gestalt theoretical psychotherapy. --79.228.5.119 (talk) 11:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gestalt therapy ansd Gestalt theoretical psychotherapy
Talk:Franconian Jura

message: This is also called Bayerischer Jura or Oberpfälzer Jura - see :de:Oberpfälzer Jura.  I would add this information to the article, but I am not quite sure if it is synonymous with the whole range, or is part of it.  This needs to  be clarified.
"Oberpfälzer Jura" is only a part of it; Upper Palatinate part of Middle Franconian Jura (Mittlere Frankenalb in german) and this term is mainly used by tourism marketing. "Bayerischer Jura" isn't a geographical term and also not common. Its only a marketing term for tourism in a limited area. Other areas (northern parts) are f.e. "Fränkische Schweiz" and "Hersbrucker Schweiz" rsp. "Hersbrucker Alb". But "Franconian Jura" or in German Fränkische Alb, Frankenalb, Fränkischer Jura are names for whole of it.ManfredV (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

message: Esdxxsseds
Hart Road is a very good place to work in and I can do the same on the same site as the last one 84.70.187.154 (talk) 20:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  W and I can do the same on the interview on Friday and Tuesday and Monday next Tuesday at the interview
Talk:Interpersonal therapy

message: This article is good reads a bit too much like a scientific review and is not very accessible to the lay person. Could anyone have a go at making the style a bit easier to understand. Reduced use of abbreviations and jargon would help. 81.179.234.128 19:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing that out. It is indeed a copy of that article. I will try to restore a pre-copyvio version. According to the contribution history, the text from the Robertson article was added 12 December 2006.--Paul Erik 00:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic Writing Style 

message: I assumed this to be a non-controversial merge. Interpersonal therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy refer to the same treatment (IPT), and the latter term is the one used most often in the literature. --Paul Erik 00:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Interpersonal psychotherapy]]
Category talk:Wikipedian psychologists

message: Should this perhaps be placed in the scientists category? Richard001 (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientists?

message: Many of the self-described psychologists listed lack the Ph.D degree that the page prescribes. That is an argument against listing this page under scientists. The trouble is, many people feel entitled to label themselves psychologists without academic qualifications. This would never happen in physics. Should we perhaps have a more specific page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidengregg (talk • contribs) 11:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Scientists?
Talk:Ross Barnes

message: Where did Roscoe Conkling Barnes come from? My research says his name was Charles Roscoe BARNES? Was Conkling a nick name?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurtmccrary (talk • contribs) 16:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been some controversy over the last few years as to what his name was.  His name was always thought to have been Roscoe Conkling Barnes until very recently, when some published SABR research indicated that it was Charles Roscoe Barnes.  For the record Roscoe Conkling was a famous politician in Barnes' youth, but it's unlikely that he would have been named for the man in when he was born in 1850, as Conkling wasn't very well-known at all at that time.  It seems more likely that the "Charles Roscoe" was Barnes' real name, that he used his middle name, that someone thought it amusing to add the extra middle name when he was older to connect him with the more famous man, and that history has forgotten the origin.  Just a theory; it might be wrong.  -- Couillaud (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin
Talk:Zegna

message: This article confuses the terms bespoke and made-to-measure.  Made-to-measure suits merely infer that the pattern used by the tailor who built the suit was adjusted for the consumer.  Bespoke, meanwhile, suggests that the pattern was created with the customer in mind.  Zegna today builds a small number of bespoke suits, a substantial number of made-to-measure suits, and an ever-increasing number of off-the-rack suits ready for only finish tailoring. 69.219.146.25 21:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Forty percent of the company's sales are in the Americas, 40 percent in Europe and 25 percent in Asia."
That adds up to 105%. I'd change it, but I dont know what the real figures are and im loath to submit incorrect information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.103.28 (talk) 15:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone cant do math... 

message: The first sentence includes "is an Italian fashion house that claims to be the world leader in fine men's clothing". It may be true, but the tone of the sentence (maybe I'm just reading too much into it) doesn't sound neutral.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.212.225 (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derisive tone? 
Talk:Charlie Bennett

message: The third paragraph in the article states "The Detroit Tigers played their home games at Bennett Park from 1896 through the 1911 season.   The Detroit Tigers did not exist until 1901.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.80.150 (talk) 12:00, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, they did exist in 1896.  They didn't become a major league club until 1901, but they were existed as a minor league club prior to that. Cbl62 (talk) 16:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Frank Bell (baseball)

message: It's my understanding of WP:BIO that professional athletes are generally notable, regardless of how long ago the player lived. The American Association was one of the two major pro baseball leagues at the time. Thus, I've deprodded this article; if you disagree take it to WP:AfD. BryanG(talk) 06:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprod
Talk:Charlie Bell (baseball)

message: It's my understanding of WP:BIO that professional athletes are generally notable, regardless of how long ago the player lived. The American Association was one of the two major pro baseball leagues at the time. Thus, I've deprodded this article; if you disagree take it to WP:AfD. BryanG(talk) 06:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprod
Talk:George Bird (baseball)

message: It's my understanding of WP:BIO that professional athletes are generally notable, regardless of how long ago the player lived. The National Association was one of the two major pro baseball leagues at the time. Thus, I've deprodded this article; if you disagree take it to WP:AfD. BryanG(talk) 07:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprod