Talk:Hurricane Felix (1995)

message: Some will question this article's existence.  I don't really have a strong opinion.  It does sound like it's more notable than Hurricane Gaston (2004), however. — jdorje (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, B class on the first try. Cool! The reason for the aticle is the extensive preparation for an area that rarely sees hurricanes, as well as the effects a hurricane can have without making landfall. Hurricanehink 01:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is an excellent article for an underrated storm. Those are the kind of storms that really need to get people's attention - because who knows, maybe next time it will come in? Also 8 deaths with little damage is quite unusual; it was quite deadly in the open water. CrazyC83 02:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agreed. I thought it would be an interesting article to write, especially given the level of preparation. I added damage totals. Hurricanehink 11:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: I can't think of any way to really improve this article even thought it's supposed to be the GA collaboration of the week, should we just put this up for peer review? Homestarmy 13:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and done. Tarret 16:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review?

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and add access dates for the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: We had a system at one of my former workplaces which displayed AccuWeather forecasts of Felix in real-time, and AccuWeather kept forecasting the storm to move westward through North Carolina into Tennessee.  It could be worth seeing if there is a reference to this online, outside of a blog.  Thegreatdr (talk) 13:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuweather forecasts of this system

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Felix (1995). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:jKTQ2eP0ln4J:www.weather.bm/tropicalArchiveDocuments/Summary%2520And%2520Miscellaneous/Summary%2520of%2520Tropical%2520Climatology%2520-%2520with%2520List.docx+&cd=12&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us with https://web.archive.org/web/20151117025834/http://www.weather.bm/tropicalArchiveDocuments/Summary%20And%20Miscellaneous/Summary%20of%20Tropical%20Climatology%20-%20with%20List.docx on https://www.weather.bm/tropicalArchiveDocuments/Summary%20And%20Miscellaneous/Summary%20of%20Tropical%20Climatology%20-%20with%20List.docx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified