Talk:Lída Baarová

message: I am told she never loved Joesph Goebbels. 65.10.80.215 17:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Veracity of the narrative

message: I restored the original version of the Lida Baarova encyclopedia entry. You are welcome to rewrite it as you like. I have better things to do with my life. David Cruise 05:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm having a hard time assuming good faith out here. I suggest you start reading some policies. Articles need to be unbiased, it's edged in stone out here. I have removed your systematic bias from the article. Please don't add it back until you have read WP:NPOV. Thanks :)SoothingR 20:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Pavel's feeling that encyclopedias should be "dry". Could mention be added to this article about when and why this actress changed her last name from Babková to Baarová? Also, the intro to the article probably should have a summary of why she was important (briefly mention her controversial involvement with the Nazis, for instance). Olessi 08:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Version

message: SR, you did not edit, you wrote your own version of the article which from my view is as NPOV as my version likely appears NPOV to you. So what should we do? Engage in revert wars? I personally abhor censorship and the reason I came to the United States forty years ago was that the US Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech as one of the basic human rights. I do not want to abridge your freedom of expression, please do not trammel mine.
What I propose is to create Lida Baarova disambig page. I'll move my version to Lida Baarova  (biography) and your version to Lida Baarova (movie actress). If you wish, you can change the (movie actress) to something else, as you like. David Cruise 18:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree completely with such an action. It goes against the community atmosphere of Wikipedia and only creates added confusion for people interested in this actress. The Wikipedia project has several procedures to deal with dispute resolution which should be used instead of such drastic changes. Olessi 20:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree with the diambig too. IMHO the page as it was (with the romantic tone) was not perfect but acceptable (and better than say 90% of other articles on Wikipedia). Making "perfect" article here would require more people, knowledgeable of the topic, with access to contemporary sources, etc.  The Cruise's version was good enough and I consider the reverts back and forth as waste of time. Pavel Vozenilek 19:10, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Irreconciable differences

message: If you take a look at her tumbstone at Find-A-Grave, you can see that the date of birth is different than the one mentioned here. Lincher 16:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth? Sept. 7 1914? 

message: :Image:GermanBaarova2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GermanBaarova2.jpg

message: :Image:Baarovaax.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Baarovaax.jpg

message: Current version of this article says, that (Goebbels) ...wanted to divorce his wife, marry Lída Baarová, and leave Germany with his Liduška, (Czech diminutive of Lída, connoting love).  I'm Czech, and Liduška is of course Czech diminutive of Lída, but the word itself has nothing in common with love, I think - Czech word for love is láska. Does the connotation mean, that Goebbels called her "Liduška", since he loved her? --Vejvančický (talk) 20:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liduška connoting love in Czech?