lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Krakowiak

message: Is this for real or is this vandalism? I strongly suspect the latter.  Kostaki mou (talk) 03:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If it isn't vandalism, why is there nothing about it in the Polish version?  (And, to the person who undid the "anti-pecker vandalism," a good-faith edit, even if incorrect, is not vandalism.)  Kostaki mou (talk) 21:21, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds to me as though "Pecker dance" is an English-language nickname, and so might not be on the Polish wiki. 92.24.198.203 (talk) 18:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds like vandalism to me; I've removed it because I don't see it in any relevant sources and the contributor did not provide a source. If someone wants to put the term back in, please provide a source. Doremo (talk) 13:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: sometimes referred to as the Pecker Dance

message: The first printed Krakowiak appeared in Franciszek Mirecki's album for the piano, "Krakowiaks Offered to the Women of Poland" (Warsaw, 1816).
However, Google immediately points to the "Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung", no. 5, February 2, 1814. Here is a review of Okonski's "Mazures et Krakowiaks pour le Pianoforte", published in Leipzig by Breitkopf & Härtel. This edition (according to the description) contains three krakowiaks. So, Mirecki was not the first one. -- M. G. J. (talk) 19:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  fact?
Talk:Crystal optics

message: The article currently claims that the symmetry of the electric susceptibility tensor can be derived from thermodynamic arguments. Although a citation is not given, I have seen this same claim elsewhere, but I am unable to find a description of the thermodynamic arguments.  Could someone find out what they are and maybe incorporate them into the article?
Tobycrisford (talk) 22:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symmetry of Electric Susceptibility Tensor 

message: The article says that the basis in which epsilon can be diagonalized is orthogonal only if epsilon is real. What happens in the general case where one has both refraction and absorption? In isotropic media, n=Re[sqrt(epsilon)] and absorption k=Im[sqrt(epsilon)], but how would those expressions be generalized to the tensor case? Would be nice if somebody could add the corresponding expressions. 12.104.156.31 (talk) 02:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does the case of nonzero absorption look like?
Talk:20/20 (disambiguation)

message: I've seen the term 20/20 used in magazines and on television several times, but never really understood what it means. None of the linked articles on this disambiguation page really explains it. What did Beach Boys and the American television newsmagazine refer to, when they used the name 20/20?
Disclaimer: I'm not American. --HelgeStenstrom (talk) 09:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does 20/20 mean?
Talk:Seguidilla

message: In the dances of Castille the man play the castanets when dancing too,not only the woman.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.9.76.185 (talk) 18:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Sevillanas

message: I don't understand. Sevillanas are or nor a part of Flamenco?
:Sevillanas have in the recent past been stylized by Flamenco dancers and Flamenco teachers. In one sense, it has been incorporated into Flamenco. Like some other dance styles (eg rumba gitana). However, historically, there is no link with Seville. It was just the North of Spain pretending this was the way they danced in the South. And actually convincing French romantic writers and English tourists of this. No wonder Flamenco purists object to the inclusion of the Sevillanas among "Flamenco styles". Some go so far as claiming Sevillanas have as much to do with Flamenco as that "Latin" ballroom dance, the paso doble, has.
:But Sevillanas have their advantages. It is easy to learn them and so, they even get men on the dance floor. The other Flamenco dance styles have only women performers, apart from a very limited number of very, very good men.--Pan Gerwazy 23:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: please provide SOME sort of facts to back up this claim that Sevillanas are not from Sevilla.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.32.172.57 (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Flamenco

message: Paco de Lucia plays Sevillanas, Paco Pena plays Sevillanas, Tomatito play Sevillanas. 'nuff said.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.205.201.242 (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultimate proof that Sevillanas is ineed flamenco 

message: The entry for "castanets" says that Sevillanas, not flamenco, is the preferred dance form for use of castanets, but this entry (Sevillanas) makes no mention of castanets.
Rainier Wolfcastle (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Castanets
Talk:24/7 service

message: I have run into one or two websites who say they are open '25 hours', is this simply supposed to denote that they never close (similarly to putting in 110% into something)?--Dcsmith 12:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd simply assume that to be a marketing gag, based on its logical impossibility. MadMaxDog 08:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "24/7/365"
Is this phrase not illogical? 24/7 denotes 24 hours x 7 days a week. So following that formula it should be 24/7/52, correct? 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year? Otherwise, according to the phrase it is "24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year" which breaks the trend in sorting service hours. Luet 06:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if the phrase is illogical, it does not make it confusing, I think, and there's no reason why people won't use it. Not our business to change language to fit semantic logic... Ingolfson 01:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

text: You are missing my point - doing the math above is pedantic (I am not insulting you, I'm quite pedantic myself, often enough), because the "24/7/365" combo is quite easily understandable, and does  need to make additional sense beyond that. Lots of phrases are not quite correct, and exist anyway. Ingolfson 05:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually, I've just thought of something. 24/7 implies that it available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. So doesn't that in itself imply that it is constantly in service, every single day of the year? Unless you go by years, saying one year it's 24/7, the next year it may not be. Which is why it's 24/7 instead of just 24, I guess. Any thoughts?Luet 00:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, since 24/7 may often (for non-IT businesses) only cover regular days, that is, not counting holidays (i.e. Christmas). In the IT world, 24/7 is more often connected to 365 days by year availability. DokReggar (talk) 12:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

text: More importantly why is it written "24/7" which equals ≈3.43 ? Mathematically the correct form should be "24×7". Based on how it's pronounced "twentyfour-seven" it should be written "24-7", (unless you actually pronounce it "twentyfour-per-seven", "twentifour-slash-seven", or "twentyfour-devided-by-seven"). ;P Qvasi (talk) 09:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

text: "24-7-365" is redundant, unless you are talking about a period of just under 7 years (365 weeks). If you want to communicate year-round availability, "24-365" suffices. 198.70.193.2 (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year-round service phraseology 

message: Is there any authoritative answer on whether the correct notation is 24/7 or 24x7 ? 17:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation ? 

message: Asking for a code 2600:1700:344D:AC10:C477:FDC0:5D6D:7222 (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: So what code I put in 2600:1700:344D:AC10:C477:FDC0:5D6D:7222 (talk) 04:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  My air talk iPhone àsking for a code
Talk:Kondo effect

message: We now know more about the Kondo Effect, and this should probably be added to the article.
More here: http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/25152.wss 66.27.114.6 (talk) 22:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Information

message: Why are wikipedia pages so prone to skipping explanation on bizarre constants or variables in equations?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.16.38.68 (talk) 03:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In the original paper by Kondo it is named c, and is just a constant. Materialscientist (talk) 09:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What is C<sub>m</sub>??

message: This article needs a far more simplified section for the average reader. Tmangray 16:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Simplify

message: Perhaps this needs to be emphasised over the divergent resistivity in the T=0 limit, since the resistance minimum was the experimental motivation for studying the problem, while the divergent resistivity is an artifact of the theory being non-perturbative. PhysicsBob 22:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Resistance Minimum

message: Ridiculous! There is a comment about the Kondo problem with Majorana zero modes (which, are currently barely even a discovery since only some of their properties have been confirmed), yet there is not a word on the fact that in the 80s Natan Andrei solved the problem exactly with the Bethe ansatz. Also, the citation for the Kondo effect in a quantum dot should include to the paper by David Goldhaber-Gordon, which measured it FIRST. Please correct these issues....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.15.3 (talk) 00:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Majorana Fermions in 2012???? What about the exact solution by Natan Andrei?

message: I would suggest merging the article with the article Kondo model under the name "Kondo effect".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nayano2 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: duplicity

message: There should be a "Spin-Flip Scattering" page that redirects to here, because it is a very commonly used term.
2001:7C0:2012:30:9C78:9CD8:3118:C41C (talk) 09:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-Flip Scattering
Talk:3ds (disambiguation)

message: Please add an entry for the singular form, where "3ds" is the plural of "3d", so link to 3D (disambiguation) -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 23:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be a fairly non-controversial edit where you are probably not really subject to a conflict of interest. In such cases, feel free to implement the edits yourself. I've already made the requested edit for you here. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 15:27, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Change request
Talk:Paydushko horo

message: I added a description of the dance, along with one of the variations.  I know what the banter sounds like, but I don't know Bulgarian nor how to write it.  I am hoping that somebody who knows the language can fix the spelling.
I know that Wikipedia is not supposed to be a "how-to", so I only listed one variation.  I can add a list of the variations that I know, if that is okay with others. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 16:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think your additions are great. Thank you. --Fang Aili talk 16:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They might have been if the article was on Daichovo! ;^)  Sorry, Senior Moment. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 18:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Description of the dance
Talk:5-inch gun

message: This image is of a 5 inch gun. Because the image was taken before 1923, it can be used here. However, I do not have the expertise to know if this is a 5"/25 or a 5"/51. If you know, please upload the image and place it appropriately. Kingturtle (talk) 00:41, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  image
Talk:8 (disambiguation)

message: Dear Colleagues,
There is an ongoing discussion on the organization of number pages and number disambiguation pages.
Your comments would be much appreciated!! Please see and participate in:
* Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Numbers#Organization_of_number_pages
Thank you for your participation!
Cheers,
PolarYukon (talk) 15:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization of number pages and number disambiguation pages

message: It appears that all the changes since  violate WP:DAB, MOS:DAB and WP:D3 most egregiously. I propose reverting to this version as a stable platform for improvement in line with these guidelines and the rationale for disambiguation pages. --MegaSloth (talk) 22:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: revert done to avoid someone doing it by hand. --MegaSloth (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose reverting this page to previous version 

message: These two OSes should be included in this page. Why you always delete it???
Applist (talk) 06:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the operating systems are not known as "8" and it is not likely that any reader of the encyclopedia wanting information on them would search under "8" and find themselves on this dab page. Just as we don't include "series 8" of every soap opera, or the 8th edition of a book. PamD 07:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why you disagree with me??? 

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg for a centralized discusion as to whether Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg should be included in these pages. Certes (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg
Talk:9 to 5 (disambiguation)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :9 to 5 (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#9 to 5 (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "9 to 5 (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Ballistic transport

message: I've proposed a merger with Ballistic conduction, because (as far as I can tell) the two are just different descriptions of the same effect.  Djr32 (talk) 21:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose the merge.Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 20:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Support Casey boy (talk) 22:58, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

text: I support the merger as well. Tls60 (talk) 14:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Willie Hall (pianist)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Willie Hall → Willie Hall (keyboardist) — There are at least four articles named "Willie Hall" in Wikipedia (see Willie Hall (disambiguation)). I don't think any of them is far more notable than the others. The article titled "Willie Hall" (without any bracketed words) should be used for disambiguation purpose. supernorton 18:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* I have no objection to changing "Willie Hall" to a disambiguation, but suggest that "Willie Hall (pianist)" would be a better title for this one than "(keyboardist)". Alternatively, disambiguating with the nickname, eg "Willie Hall (Drive'em Down)", would seem reasonable as well. -- Infrogmation 18:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 18:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* I have no objection to changing "Willie Hall" to a disambiguation, but suggest that "Willie Hall (pianist)" would be a better title for this one than "(keyboardist)". Alternatively, disambiguating with the nickname, eg "Willie Hall (Drive'em Down)", would seem reasonable as well. -- Infrogmation 18:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 18:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Primitive cell

message: The article previously had some confusion about primitive cells. All three dimensional lattices can be represented by parallelepiped primtive cells, but there are non-parallelepiped primitive cells as well. The use of parallelepiped cells is a convention, so that different lattices can be compared easily. Forbes72 (talk) 23:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Primitive cell definition
Talk:Pete Johnson (musician)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/pete-johnson-mn0000315909/biography and http://www.history-of-rock.com/boogiewoogie_artists.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 20:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 21:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 January 2022
Talk:Pat Patrick (musician)

message: This article is under the wrong name. He was always known professionally, publicly, and by his friends as Pat Patrick.  Laurdine was his real first name, but he rarely used it.  Also, although I know his son's fame has far outstripped his own, and some mention of his personal life with his son should be stated here, Pat Patrick was an important, respected, and innovative jazz musician with a long performing and recording career. So it's curious that there's only a couple of lines here about his professional career and few paragraphs about his son.MingusMingus (talk) 08:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: MingusMingus and ZeroXero: agreed, so I've moved the page. Both AllMusic and Grove Music use "Pat Patrick", in case anyone thinks we're making this up. EddieHugh (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Wiedemann–Franz law

message: The following paragraph in the article is identical to text from the [Hyperphysics web page]:
Qualitatively, this relationship is based upon the fact that the heat and electrical transport both involve the free electrons in the metal. The thermal conductivity increases with the average particle velocity since this increases the forward transport of energy. The electrical conductivity, on the other hand, decreases while particle velocity increases because the collisions divert the electrons from forward transport of charge.
I don't know who copied who or whether Hyperphysics gave permission for Wikipedia to use the text. Is this copyright infringement?
--DelusionOfGrandeur 21:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

message: "Bristol physicists break 150-year-old law" - July 20, 2011 
:"A violation of one of the oldest empirical laws of physics has been observed by scientists at the University of Bristol. Their experiments on purple bronze, a metal with unique one-dimensional electronic properties, indicate that it breaks the Wiedemann-Franz Law. This historic discovery is described in a paper published today in Nature Communications."
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-07-bristol-physicists-year-old-law.html 
-- 186.221.131.194 (talk) 23:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Observed violation of  Wiedemann-Franz law 

message: In the article, it is said
Theoretically, the proportionality constant L, known as the Lorenz number, is equal to
    L = κ σ T = π 2 3 ( k B e ) 2 = 2.44 × 10 − 8 W Ω K − 2 . 
So, Lorentz NUMBER is simply historical name, being wrong concerning terminological principles, and should be changed.
"Number" should be really number only, having  neutral dimension 1.
Example: Reynolds number. Any "characteristic number" from ISO/IEC 80000-11 Characteristic numbers
If it has a dimension (here unit: W Ω K − 2), then the term "number" is simply wrong, even being maybe frequently used, and must be changed for "coefficient".
E.g.: so called "wave number" (being no number, too) has been changed to "repetency" (or, at least, "wavenumber" written as one word without space, not to read "number" explicitely).
See International Standards 80000 series, above quoted, and Directives ISO/IEC.
If the historical name goes against terminological principles, is must not be kept. JOb (talk) 08:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper name "Lorenz NUMBER"