Talk:Java Platform, Micro Edition

message: This article should be renamed to Java Standard Edition, in accordance with the change in the naming convention announced at this year's JavaONE convention.  aidan_walsh
: Wrong. This article should be renamed Java Micro Edition, not Java Standard Edition as described in the above paragraph.
:: Yes the paragraph at the top is wrong. It should not be renamed to Java Standard Edition.
: Dear all, 
: as far as i can see, the Java 2 Micro Edition (J2ME) is now simply Java Micro Edition, or JME. that reflects Sun perception that now all Java is what was once called Java 2. 
: so, we should have a line stating that Java 2 Micro Edition (J2ME) is now officially called Java Micro Edition, or JME.
: Regards, --Hgfernan 21:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename Article 

message: I've removed one link as it was an J2ME application, not a resource on J2ME. However I also question the following:   
Does anyone else feel that they should be removed as spam? mlk ✉♬ 12:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and removed Brownb2 20:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam? 

message: Sun not supporting the Pocket PC is a pretty big deal.  The thread complaining about it:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=408223 has been alive and well for 3 years. Mathiastck 17:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pocket PC 

message: Someone added SaveJe to the See Also list.
http://www.savaje.com/
Mathiastck 19:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SavaJe 

message: Some mention should be made of Sun open sourcing parts of java, including this part :)
http://www.sun.com/software/opensource/java/getinvolved.jsp
Mathiastck 18:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open Source 

message: Is there any way to run J2ME programs on windows PCs, with an emulator or otherwise? 69.85.180.142 10:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sun has an emulator, in it's WTK, as do most manufactuers, and some carriers.  Mathiastck 19:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows 

message: My earlier editing was deleted, but I think an external link to http://www.jbenchmark.com/result.jsp is reasonable to be added to this article because JBenchmark database is the most complete database of Java ME devices currenlty on the web. Most developers use it for compatibility and performance checks.Kishonti 21:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to Java ME device database might be added 

message: [...] targeting a non-Intel-based small device will require a vendor-supplied JVM to be available on the device.
Intel-based = x86 architecture? --Abdull 09:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intel = x86? 

message: Searching on kJava redirects to this page -- but there is no indication what kJava might be, or how kJava might related to J2ME or CLDC. Heck, the string "kJava" doesn't even appear on the page at all.
I guess this is an invitation to anyone that knows what kJava is to do something. Maybe put the word on the page. Maybe change the redirect. But if you wait around long enought, I will find out on my own about kJava and then update Wikipedia myself. Trust me, it is better if someone who knows what they are talking about goes for it.
192.223.163.5 17:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  kJava 

message: A list of limitations compared to SE could be relevant -Sigmundur 14:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  differences to SE 

message: Can someone add info from here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.128.180.134 (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like an abstract plan for an undefined future. Unlike iPhone, J2ME runs on a large variety of phones, some of which are quite limited in capabilities. Also SE as it currently is may not be ideal for dealing with the limited output and input capabilities of phones. ¤ ehudshapira 15:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phasing out J2ME 

message: J2ME can be further stripped down and be developed to be used for platform independent bare bone GUI and an super light weight alternative to HTML with enough features to give HTML AJAX a run for its life.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.11.19.253 (talk) 11:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future use of J2ME source code 

message: It has been nearly a decade since I started Java ME(J2ME) programming. It was a very exciting experience being the first author on this subject in India and being one of the first trainers on this subject in the whole of South Asia. After training top corporates like Reliance Communications, LG, Kyocera, Mahindra Satyam etc for big bucks now I have shared my book for free for the benefit of all Java ME (J2ME) programmers. I hope it will benefit all the readers. This book contains my experience of designing mobile games and applications. Following is the link : Book - Mobile Phone Programming using Java ME (J2ME)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skj.saurabh (talk • contribs) 15:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to J2ME Book Full Text 

message: Currently, this article states
:The Connected Limited Device Configuration (CLDC) contains a strict subset of the Java-class libraries, and is the minimum amount needed for a Java virtual machine to operate.
This reads as if a "J2ME JVM" requires Java classes to run. Why should this be the case? Shouldn't a JVM be a plattform that CLDC classes can run on?
Besides, does J2ME make any modifications to the JVM specification? Or is it that any correct JVM implementation can execute J2ME software?
Thanks, --Abdull (talk) 13:44, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  JVM dependent on J2ME? 

message: I would like to know what is the difference between the Java support as MIDP 2.0 and Java via Emylatore  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.204.20.25 (talk) 03:23, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Java support for mobiles 

message: In the ESR section there is a phrase "300 classes API". I am not sure the original intent of that writer, but I have thought of "300 class API's" as a possible rephrase. Is that acceptable? I also thought of "300 API classes" but perhaps that has a different meaning. 
Senobyte (talk) 07:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  phrasing 

message: ...Is Android based on the Java ME? 221.221.222.155 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 01:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No. I just added a reference explaining it. It is similar but not identical. I only looked at the first good reference. Someone should probably verify this. Lehasa (talk) 01:14, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question please... 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Java Platform, Micro Edition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106053708/http://developer.sonyericsson.com/ to http://developer.sonyericsson.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080521160132/http://jbenchmark.com/ to http://www.jbenchmark.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "It is popular in sub $200 devices such as Nokia's Series 40." Wait, is it? I thought they had discontinued the S40 several years ago. And even $100 nets you a pretty good Android smartphone these days. So I have to assume this article needs a major update. --177.134.133.23 (talk) 10:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rather outdated article 

message: https://github.com/nikita36078/J2ME-Loader I don't know if this link would be interesting for the article. --Error (talk) 22:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  J2ME Loader for Android  

message: Today most mobile phones use Android, which again uses some flavor of JavaSE or Kotlin.  So I think that JavaME for mobile phones is no longer so relevant. Maybe the article should be updated based on real data.--Bk1 168 (talk) 18:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is not the best. Java ME stands for micro not mobile, and afaik Java ME still has some uses in micro devices. Oracle do not seem to be pushing it very much, and the only platform for micro devices I can see advertised on the website is Java Card. I am not even sure if this technology is still alive. The article does not mention anything recent. I don't think modern smartphones have ever used JavaSE, even Android has its own implementation of the platform. It seems fair to say no modern smart phones are using Java ME.Bsdrevise (talk) 12:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile Phones