Talk:Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna of Russia

message: Someone add the burial place of Maria....  dont think that she is in St-Perer and st-paul at the moment... No anouncement have been done.
::Maria was buried with the other family members in 1997. Anastasia and Alexei were most likely the two who were discovered most recently. The Russians based their identification of Anastasia on questionable physical evidence. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maria (and alexis) is not wet buried according to the official government and according to the Romanov family association! http://romanovfundforrussia.org/family/ce.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.82.250.118 (talk) 13:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: American scientists identified the two missing bodies as Anastasia and Alexei. The body the Russians buried was too tall and a few years too old to have been Anastasia and was almost certainly Maria. The remains found last year were Anastasia and Alexei. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 13:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Burial

message: I was just wondering who put in the bit about Maria hemmorhaging in 1914??
I have never heard this before and just wondered what the historical source was. 
--SaraFL 11:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Maria's Tonsil Operation

message: June 27? I have to erase my entry of her birthday which I put on 26th of June! Where did you get that info, Lisa?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mashka1899 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Maria's birthdate

message: There have been several films, including the animated Anastasia (1997) and live action film of the same name starring Ingrid Bergman (1956). Also, there have been many novels focusing on the survival of the younger imperial children:
The Romanov Prophecy by Steven Berry in which Anastasia and Alexei were supposed to have survived. 
The Kitchen Boy by Robert Alexander in which one of the grand duchesses is rescued by one of her killers.
This has way more to do with Anastasia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.136.71.163 (talk) 20:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance?

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. There are a couple of minor problems which should be addressed however. There are citations which appear in the middle of sentances. These should be moved to come after punctuation. There is also no need to repeatedly link Margaretta Eagar. Otherwise the article is excellent. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 00:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps

message: I just went in and fixed some minor errors. The line about Louis Mountbatten, was in the article twice and I went in and removed the one where it made the least sence. There was also a place in the article where they referred to Maria as Tatiana which is not suprising since the same person wrote both articles and copied and pasted the paragraph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.150.52 (talk) 04:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Clean Up

message: Someone's overhauled the section on Maria's death to where there is only one single theory listed now. It also makes assumptions regarding specific body identification which, officially, is still in dispute. Is there anyone who can work the other opinions back in there to make this section more diverse again and less narrow to one author's opinion? Thanks. --Tsukiakari (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna of Russia (1899–1918). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121021141816/http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070823/ap_on_re_eu/russia_czar_s_son to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070823/ap_on_re_eu/russia_czar_s_son
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Both this wiki-page and Mountbatten's own page confirm that he had a crush on her and kept her picture beside his bed until his death. But we don't know if they had ever met. Valetude (talk) 22:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mountbatten? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna of Russia (1899–1918). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050824094901/http://www.struggler.org:80/GlorificationOfTheRoyalFamily.html to http://www.struggler.org/GlorificationOfTheRoyalFamily.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This description, "with the great strength of her grandfather Alexander III of Russia," needs a source. It sounds suspect; how could a young girl be as strong as a fully grown man? I'm tempted to delete it, but am first doing diligence, specifically checking Massie, which is cited for Maria's physical description.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChiHistoryeditor (talk • contribs) 16:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical description 

message: The actual biography section of this article is currently just one long block of text that is difficult to read. While this is a problem on its own, it's led to some information being repeated such as Maria and Anastasia wearing similar clothes. I also think the introductory description is a bit bloated but my major concern is the life and characteristics section. My suggestion is to rewrite some parts of it and break it down to make reading it a more pleasant experience in a similar way, though not necessarily identical, to how I broke it up in my edit. Zinalova (talk) 00:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better organisation 

message: Karitiz added a section to "revolution and captivity" about a trial being held in Moscow in April of 1918. I have yet to find any record of this and I could not find the reference posted. If anyone has a source relating to the trial of Nicholas II and Alexandra, please send it to me as this is very important information. If not I will edit that section out as it is very misleading. CertifiedSleepyy (talk) 08:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  On "Revolution and Captivity"