lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kilmallock

message: There's information about a Railway station here, but no article. Could someone create it TMN81 (talk) 12:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killmallock station 

message: There is no information on geography in this area. TMN81 (talk) 12:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:Will Heaton

message: I'm not sure if this is the best photo for this article since Heaton isn't even in it.  Maybe one like this: http://sma-www.cfa.harvard.edu/private/engsite/Limages/congressVisit01L.png would be good (Heaton is the furthest to the left), though there're probably better pictures out there. Surfeited 22:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Actually, there's already a William Heaton article that was created a while ago that has more content.  What's the best way to redirect? Surfeited 01:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Template talk:Florida Gators quarterback navbox

message: I've decided to stop adding ones that don't have articles. Here is a list of some that do not currently have articles. If any of these turn blue and are not someone else, they can be added back.
* Andrew Blaylock
* Rodney Brewer
* Noah Brindise
* Michael Cohen
* Jeff Creveling
* Terry Dean
* Gavin Dickey
* Donald Douglas
* Jimmy Dunn
* Brandon Frazier
* Don Gaffney
* Mark Guandolo
* Michael Guilford
* Cornelius Ingram - though afaik, his only contribution as quarterback was directing one offensive drive in the fourth quarter of the 2004 Louisiana tech game...
* Eric Kresser
* Matt Kynes
* Bobby Lance
* Larry Libertore
* Kevin McKinnon
* Justin Midgett
* Wayne Peace
* Josh Portis
* Larry Richart
* Butch Rowley
* Bobby Sabelhaus
* Tom Shannon
* Chris Stephens
* Bryan Weggener
* Adam Whitehurst
* Billy Young, but not this one, this one, or even this one
Btyner 22:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Herbert Perry should be added to the template.   Hirolovesswords (talk) 20:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source that he played both baseball and was quarterback for the gators? I have not been able to find one. Btyner (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, those sources look pretty definitive. Thanks Btyner (talk) 22:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Herbert Perry

message: The template is now labeled Florida Gators Starting Quarterbacks, but several of the QBs listed (the younger John Brantley, Chan Gailey, Cam Newton, and Brian Schottenheimer) never started a game for the Gators, while Eric Joel Kresser did start one game for the Gators (1995 Florida-Vanderbilt game) and is not listed. Shouldn't this all be rectified? WTStoffs (talk) 08:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added Kresser. The relabeling was done by User:Geologik. I would not be opposed to the removal of the non-starting quarterbacks. Btyner (talk) 04:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, John Brantley has started now, but let's give Chan Gailey his credit, too, as shown by this and this.Cwelgo (talk) 19:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cwelgo, Chan Gailey (1972) is already listed immediately after John Reaves (1969–1971).  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Argh! I should have spent more time scanning the template and less time reading the comment above. Mea culpa.Cwelgo (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  starting quarterback?
Talk:Semantic neural network

message: This page makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. This may be the least-coherent 'pedia article I've ever come across. It's not even clear enough for me to try to make a start rewriting it -- an d I know a bit about AI programming (hell, I've even got a copy of Amosov's Modeling of Thinking... but I'm baffled. Maybe I'll bookmark it and come back later and see if anybody else has had a go at this...Eaglizard 22:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: I am a researcher of NLP and Brain Science. This article cites paranormal activities and therefore I find it irrelevant. Sandman2007 (talk) 11:29, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this article includes a bizarre (and probably irrelevant) description of "astral bodies" and "paranormal effects." Jarble (talk) 02:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paranormal Activities
Talk:Malcom Floyd

message: "How is he the first Samoan & African American Player in the NFL when his brother played for the Oilers in the 1990's?"— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cboy619 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How is he the first Samoan & African American Wide Receiver in the NFL when his brother played WR for the Oilers in the 1990's?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cboy619 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First in the NFL? 
Talk:Baruch ben Isaac

message: #The view that Baruch ben Isaac of Regensburg is the same as the author of the Teruma is obsolete for a century already.
#The common allegation that Baruch ben Isaac, author of the Teruma, lived in Worms has been challenged by Emanuel. 
הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 03:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:National Shooting Sports Foundation

message: I think I detect a good faith two-step effort to improve the article here. Unfortunately I had to revert (reverse) it because it took two wrong steps compounding the problem and leaving an unacceptable result.
*First, there was a rewrite of the paragraph. It sounded reasonable if maybe a little watering-down. The big problem was it strayed considerably from the article originally cited for the paragraph. I think -- having done the paragraph -- that the original at least reasonably well reflected the source material (even if maybe it wasn't thorough or specific enough).
*Second, the editor realized that the section now didn't reflect the source material, I surmise, so went back in and removed the footnote.
The encyclopedia needs sources for all its contents so removing the footnote doesn't solve the problem. If the paragraph needs the rewrite, and I accept the possibility it does, then a "better" or additional source has to be found. If there's a way to accommodate both sources, using the additional source for the necessary refinement while leaving most of the original intact, that of course makes the original editor happier but often I think will also better address the subject (unless the first source is complete trash; which it didn't seem to me to be). For instance, if the second source were the NSSF website (seems possible and OK), it would be much preferable not to lose the independent media source. Outright mistakes in the first source can of course be corrected but with care. (The journalists, editors and publishers of that piece have put it out there; if it hasn't been corrected there, it basically stands.) Differing emphases? In general, I think the encyclo. benefits from them and removal I find unfortunate.
Clear enough for starters? Hope so. Queries/rebuttals welcome. I'll check back here. Cheers. Swliv (talk) 02:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite of 'Industry and NSSF history' section 

message: . Doug Weller talk 14:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guardian article " ‘Even more insidious than the NRA’: US gun lobby group gains in power"
Talk:Bruce Gordon (businessman)

message: I removed a reference to "Hitchcock Media International".  This company does not exist and is part of a fraud allegation (see a news article on this).  This is exactly why the BLP policy requires verified sources.  Wikipeterproject (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitchcock Media International 

message: This article provides fascinating biographical information - How Bruce Gordon the man from WIN helped catch Silvio Berlusconi. Igribbish (talk) 13:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. Used to incorporate some of the content into the article. Rangasyd (talk) 16:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruce Gordon and Silvio Berlusconi
Talk:Jo-Anne Richards

message: I am the author and copyright holder of the site 
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ma.rathfelder/Josie.htm
from which some of this material was taken
Rathfelder
Please give me time to turn what I wrote nearly ten years ago into an article
:You therefore appear to have a conflict of interest and should not be editing this article, let alone not have created this article in the first instance. Schwede66 17:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest?
Talk:Tops In Blue

message: This article is deficient because it makes no mention of the controversy surrounding Tops In Blue.  Some AF people think anything beyond the traditional military band is a waste of time and money.  Their point is, no matter how good and professional in quality the shows may be, basically who cares?  How does that further the mission?  It's also been asserted that few would attend performances (outside friends and relatives) except that their CO makes it known that they'd like them to.  I think controversy surrounding a topic are worth mentioning in an article.  There should be some cites available.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.41.7.5 (talk) 23:29, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are reliable sources that discuss this then we can work it in.  The last time someone tried to put in this kind of information they used letters to the edito which are not reliable sources.  If you find any sources, please bring them here so we can discuss them.  GB fan 23:36, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the controversy? 

message: TIB has been cancelled and the page should be updated to reflect that in order to be transparent and accurate.  21 December announcement link:http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/637595/air-force-cancels-2016-season-of-tops-in-blue.aspx  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baldcanuck (talk • contribs) 14:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As of right now the 2016 season is cancelled.  It looks like this is being done as an interim measure for a full review.  We will update as more information becomes available.  -- GB fan 15:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: TIB Cancelled
Talk:On the Town (film)

message: There are a few unnecessary navboxes here.   and  should not be included as WP:BIDIRECTIONAL states , but  refuses to accept that neither of these navboxes contain a link this article.  Claiming that I am incorrect does not make it true!  It would also be inappropriate to include this article in these navboxes as the individuals are not a primary creator of the film per WP:FILMNAV, only the creator of some of the source material.  212.135.65.247 (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Bidirectional problems can be fixed at either end.  I fixed the Jerome Robbins one at the navbox, which edit you then deleted, re-creating the problem.  Please stop creating ssimply because you want to be right.I agree that the Bernstein one should go.  Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Robbins had no involvement with the film.  Please stop fudging the navbox to shoe-horn it in.  See WP:FILMNAV which states that he needs to be a primary creator of the subject material.  212.135.65.247 (talk) 07:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: They created the ballet Fancy Free, which was the basis for the stage musical On the Town, which was the basis for the film.  That's primary - in fact, the first at the head of the line. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Navboxes
Talk:Bowood House

message: It is not clear when each bit of the house was put up, or why there were two unconnected bits. 95.149.54.104 (talk) 13:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What was built when?

message: The article states that Bowood House has been the residence of:
*Sir William Petty, (1622–1687) 
*Thomas FitzMaurice, 1st Earl of Kerry (1668–1741)
..but on the official Bowood website http://www.bowood-house.co.uk/lansdowne_family.html it says that "The Bowood Estate was bought in 1754 by John Petty Fitzmaurice, 1st Earl of Shelburne (1706–1761)".. "with the fortune left by Sir William Petty (1623-1687)" ?? And if the house wasn't built till 1725...
Brograve 23:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy with former residents? 

message: I have updated the external link to the American Chemical Society National Historic Chemical Landmarks (ACS-NHCL) resource about this topic and corrected the NHCL name in the body of the entry. I am the program coordinator of the ACS-NHCL program, and the page that was referenced has been replaced with http://portal.acs.org/portal/PublicWebSite/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/josephpriestleyoxygen/index.htm. KLindblom (talk) 16:00, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Link and Language
Talk:Asha Khadilkar

message: This article requires the attention of someone familiar with both the subject and WP:MoS. LessHeard vanU 23:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert needed 
Talk:When Women Had Tails

message: Hello,
The synopsis seems very similar to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066268/plotsummary? --Agatino Catarella (talk) 12:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  COPYVIO
Talk:Breaking the Spell (Dennett book)

message: Scientific inquiries have been underway before the publication of Dennet's book "Breaking the Spell".
- They are the Ganzfeld Raum investigations with the use of Zener cards relevant to the claim that "God is spirit".
- And the fMRI investigations of people who are without limbs for researching "phantom feelings". The nature of spirit in the World.
- And finally the Van Lommel studies of people in the surgery rooms suffering clinical death yet mysteriously surviving, i.e., the soul issues in nature more.
Like it? Cheers! 62.16.181.133 (talk) 22:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add to the article - 3 scientific inquiries - Van Lommel studies, Phantom Feelings and fMRI and Ganzfeld and Zener cards for the spirit 

message: for the “beneath him” claim. 82.35.81.189 (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference needed
Talk:Transaction logic

message: This stub could use a section on language syntax... and I know there are more references to look at for later inclusion. Hotfeba 23:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language syntax 

message: The examples are a little hard to understand. Maybe add some text prose around the
example, or some comments in the code or some references.   
The graph coloring works more or less for me. But what will the pyramid stacking 
do? Will it fetch blocks from anywhere?  
Can the latter example by turned into solving the tower of hanoi problem?
Jan Burse (talk) 20:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficulty of the Examples 
Wikipedia talk:Main Page alternatives/(Old PDA version)

message: I would love to be able to access Wikipedia from my Treo. Unfortunately, the choice of "Main pages" puts way too much on the little screen. Can we get a main page at least that does not take up my entire 320x320 screen with just the boiler plate ont eh left hand side? I recommend that it not have any articles or links, just a text window for search. We need this to be quick loading since the bandwidth is limited on these devices. If the ensuing screens could also skip all the extras and only have the article, that would be ideal. Currently, the article renders and I am left reading a column of single words. Encycloconstructs 00:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

message: per the discussion on the Main page here, i think this page needs to be prioritised so that the search box isn't one of the last things loaded.  When I'm logging on via my Blackberry, I don't really want to have to scroll through all the content of the main page before I can search for the article I'm looking for.  Comments?
James Harvey 12:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure for mobile users 

message: http://en.wap.wikipedia.org (unfortunately, it has an odd graphic of a phone completely encircling the page)
http://wapedia.mobi/en (a fairly simple layout that some people like better)
Enjoy! 68.101.123.219 (talk) 23:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  For only a search box without a left-hand bar 

message: Currently on the "real" Main Page, we have a number of features that aren't included on the PDA version, presumably for simplicity. I propose we add 
::== Other areas of Wikipedia ==
::
which produces:
Other areas of Wikipedia
As you can see, this produces pretty simple text that PDA's should have no trouble with. Is there consensus for/against this change?
Since this page seems to get little traffic, I'll make the change myself if no one objects by the new year. --YbborTalk 17:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy new year! I've made the change, no opjections raised. --YbborTalk 05:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding the "Other areas of Wikipedia" text (e.g. RD, HD, VP, etc.)
Talk:Mike Mearls

message: Mike Mearls is one of the better known and most successful of the current generation of role-playing game designers; quite a few of his works already had redlinks to his article.
Oops, should have signed that. mr_Handy 00:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article was moved from Stub to Start status because it has a significant amount of information and multiple references. In addition, the main article has not had a Stub tag for some time. Araesmojo (talk) 00:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub to Start
Category talk:Biomolecules

message: This category looks to me like it's in need of some serious cleanup. A lot (most?) of the articles appear to fall under one or more of the subcategories, and some of the articles have a scope that extends beyond naturally occurring chemicals (e.g. carcinogen, which I have removed from the category.) I'm going to work at removing the Category:Biomolecules tag from articles that fall under a subcategory, but I don't have enough patience for this type of thing to do it all myself.--Eloil 00:09, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Nevada State Route 430

message: Mileposts for SR 430 / Bus US 395 / Old US 395 as observed in the field in late 2008.  Mileposts were generally stickers affixed to traffic signal poles.
*10.35 - Eastlake Blvd (old SR 428) - Elev. 5089'
*17.00 - US 395 @ exit 57
*19.80 - Holcomb Lane (SR 671, aka Holcomb Ranch Lane)
*20.10 - US 395 @ exit 61
*20.20 - Huffaker Lane (old SR 671) / Longley Lane
*21.20 - Neil Road (old SR 667)
*22.10 - Meadowood Mall Way
*22.30 - S. McCarran Blvd (old SR 650/651)
*22.70 - Kietzke Lane (SR 667)
*23.30 - Moana Lane
*23.50 - Gentry Way
*23.78 - Peppermill south driveway
*24.29 - Plumb Lane (old SR 653)
*26.xx - E. 9th St
*26.xx - Artemesia Way
*27.45 - Sierra Street (old SR 660) / Comstock Dr
*27.57 - N. McCarran Blvd (SR 651)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljthefro (talk • contribs) 10:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Milepost notes
Talk:Amnokgang Sports Club

message: hi fellows. as the Amnokkang Sports Club is a DPRK club, wouldn't it be accurate to use the north korean romanisation, hence rendering "Amnokkang" instead of "Amnokgang"?
78.116.36.82 (talk) 22:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  romanisation
Template talk:Big 12 Conference basketball venue navbox

message: According to the current Big 12 Conference section on basketball:
:"Although standings in the conference are combined and not split among divisions, the schedule is structured as if the schools were split into two divisions. Teams play a home-and-home against teams within its division and a single game against teams from the opposite division for a total of 16 conference games. This denies Oklahoma and Oklahoma State, formerly in the Big Eight, two games a season against their opponents from that former conference, but does allow most of the other traditional rivalries to be played home-and-home."
So, there is a division based on games played (scheduling), but not based on how record is calculated. I noticed that the change I made to make the North/South division was reverted, so I thought I would post here before changing it back to see if anyone had any discussion on whether it should be or not? It doesn't really matter to me one way or the other, but I do think the North/South division makes it easier to read anyway. (Cardsplayer4life 00:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the revert because there aren't divisions in common presentations of the Big 12 in basketball. I felt that by listing divisions, it implied that divisions exist for purposes other than scheduling. Granted, it did seem to be easier to read. I am open to going back to the divisions, and I'd like to hear what others think.Boneillhawk 03:49, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the template should be separated based on division. The divisions still exist, regardless of whether or not they are used for the Big 12 tournament. As has been said, they are still used for scheduling, which usually has a pretty significant effect on the conference champion. In any case, this template doesn't list teams, it lists arenas, which in my opinion should be based on location (ie divisions). -Texink[talk] 06:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  North/South Division in basketball? 

message: What does everyone think, I think we should do sports, to be gender-neutral.--Levineps (talk) 02:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  link the schools to the sports and/or basketball teams
Talk:USS Yosemite (AD-19)

message: My Uncle/Godfather William (Bill) Turicik was a Machinist Mate from 1954-1958 on board the "Yo-Yo" as he called it.  He passed away in Carlisle, PA on 3 August 2022 at the age of 91.
It was said if you brought Bill an Alien Device, within 10 minutes he would figure out What it is, How it worked and the best way to fix it. Drewshedwick (talk) 17:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Watch: William Turicik
Talk:Red curtain

message: Is this a term used only by-or-about Baz Luhrman? Or is it actually a more widely used term? User:Pedant (talk) 00:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Baz

message: I've gone ahead and turned this stub into a redirect to The Red Curtain Trilogy.  The latter article contains all of the information presented here, and seems to be a much better place for information about what is, essentially, merely a label for a set of Baz Luhrmann films, rather than a cinematic genre in its own right, as evidenced by the fact that the present article had been listed as orphaned since February 2009 and needing additional citations since June 2007.  Rundquist (talk) 08:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[The Red Curtain Trilogy]]