Talk:Bundelkhand

message: MrOllie
 I recently made some edits to the Bundelkhand page, which I believe adhere to Wikipedia's NPOV policy and are supported by reliable sources. However, my changes were reverted by MrOllie
 with the comment "blatantly non-neutral."
I would like to open a discussion here to gather input from other editors on whether my changes were indeed non-neutral, and if so, how we can improve the article together. Please find the specific changes in question here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bundelkhand&diff=next&oldid=1148451083&diffmode=source .
Brief description of changes:
Updated the history section of the Bundelkhand article to include information on the significant dynasties and clans that have shaped the region's history, such as the Chandelas, Khangars, and Bundelas. Added details about their respective rule and contributions to the cultural and political heritage of Bundelkhand. Included references to support the provided information.
Any constructive feedback and suggestions are welcome. Thank you for your participation in maintaining Wikipedia's high standards. Python2019 (talk) 06:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on recent edits to Bundelkhand page 

message: needs a bit of improvement. quality of english in parts of the article aren't really great. Krishvanth (talk) 13:27, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  need for rewrite 

message: THIS "Mool Sharan Kushwaha" is not prominent, if you think he is , first create his wiki article after that link from here please DON'T WRITE THE CRAP AGAIN AND AGAIN IF YOU CANNOT PROVIDE A FEW THIRD PARTY SOURCES TELLING US WHY HE IS A PROMINANT BUNDELKHANDI? ELSE PLEASE DON'T VANDELIZE THE ARTICLE, PEOPLE LISTED HERE ARE VERY RESPECTED AND YOU CANNOT WRITE ANY NAME WITH THEM WHO DOESN'T HAVE THIRD PARTY SOURCES OR A SEPERATE ARTICLE ON HIM.--Adamstraw99 (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that a red link without a source or article should not be included, but there is no need for the SHOUTING or calling out of an individual in the article. The shouting makes it nearly unreadable, and the same goes for any person added without a source or article, not just the individual. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 10:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Prominent Bundelkhandis

message: Substituted at 10:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bundelkhand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.dainet.org/livelihoods/checkdams4.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080709063336/http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2405/stories/20070323000106600.htm to http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2405/stories/20070323000106600.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article states: "After khangar dynasty the Chandela clan ruled Bundelkhand from the 9th to the 16th centuries. In the early 14th century they were feudatories of the Pratiharas of Kannauj, and ruled from the fortress-city of Kalinjar."
That is misleading. Chandelas were feudatories of the Pratiharas in the beginning during the 9th cent. The Khangar ruled as local chiefs in some areas after the decline of Chandelas. Chandela rule came to an end in 1315 AD, although some local Chandela chiefs (Kiratrai, father of Durgavati) survived. Malaiya (talk) 01:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please update the article with addition of reliable citation link. RohitSaxena (talk) 18:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: History