Talk:Jane Jacobs

message: Here's the criteria I've referenced for inclusion in the "20th Century philosophers" category:
"This article takes philosophy not in the more general sense of a system of belief or ideology but as a tradition that generally requires a degree of more or less formalized study (although autodidacts have not been excluded) and a degree of institutional recognition in the form of work incorporated into subsequent formalized teaching in university philosophical education. Articles referenced here are expected to substantiate standing by demonstrating either of the above criteria."
There's nothing to substantiate this in the article. If you can substantiate it, please do.  I would, however, add that there are no small number of profound and/or influential thinkers who do not meet the above definition, including influential and subtle conceptual thinkers.  Exclusion under the above definition should not be taken as deprecation. If you have an alternate definition that prevents the term "philosopher" from becoming a catch-all, please propose it on Category talk: 20th Century philosophers. In the interim, I'd prefer to drop the categorisation in this article. Buffyg 17:24, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no convention in Wikipedia for doing this, probably since Wikipedia is not paper the issue of saving space this way doesn't arise. This article certainly needs work and if you are interested in Jane Jacobs I hope you will take the plunge. BTW, Please consider creating an account for yourself; takes all of two minutes. -- Viajero 17:40, 7 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Some mixed comments

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Jane Jacobs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080830010106/http://www.eyeweekly.com/eye/issue/issue_10.03.02/news/airport.php to http://www.eyeweekly.com/eye/issue/issue_10.03.02/news/airport.php
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081001210819/http://www.onpha.on.ca/english/doc/places.pdf to http://www.onpha.on.ca/english/doc/places.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060430115928/http://www.theglobeandmail.com:80/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060425.wjanejacobs0425/BNStory/National/home to http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060425.wjanejacobs0425/BNStory/National/home
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110927151653/http://www.urbancenterbooks.org/jane_jacobs.html to http://www.urbancenterbooks.org/jane_jacobs.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110607213026/http://www.mas.org/images/media/original/JJMedalists.pdf to http://www.mas.org/images/media/original/JJMedalists.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Many people assume she was Jewish, either by birth or marriage.  Maybe it doesn't matter, but people are curious about things like that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.253.101 (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protestant? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jane Jacobs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521035033/http://www.rockfound.org/efforts/jacobs/090808caro_transcript.pdf to http://www.rockfound.org/efforts/jacobs/090808caro_transcript.pdf
*Added  tag to http://eratos.erin.utoronto.ca/desrochers/CJRS_Jacobs.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I can't say I am extremely familiar with Jane Jacobs, having only read "Dark Age Ahead". So I couldn't and didn't fix this by myself. But what's with this random section at the end of the article? Is it part of the discussion of "Death and Life"? If so, it should be moved there. Is orthodox urbanism integral to an understanding of Jacobs' own urban philosophy? If so, why is a deeper explanation not in the overview? Is the section rather more of a see-also list? If it is, it should be moved there. 
Τηε ΓΟΟΔ (talk) 12:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  On orthodox urbanism... 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Jane Jacobs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030022021/http://www.kunstler.com/mags_jacobs2.htm to http://www.kunstler.com/mags_jacobs2.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723103732/http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/press-releases/rockefeller-foundation-honors-two-new to http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/press-releases/rockefeller-foundation-honors-two-new
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723103743/http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/press-releases/rockefeller-foundation-honors-three-new to http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/press-releases/rockefeller-foundation-honors-three-new
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160810055530/http://blog.martinprosperity.org/2012/04/cui-awards-recognize-urban-leaders-across-canada/ to http://blog.martinprosperity.org/2012/04/cui-awards-recognize-urban-leaders-across-canada/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:52, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jane Jacobs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160505144334/http://www.urbanspacegallery.ca/exhibits/jane-home to http://www.urbanspacegallery.ca/exhibits/jane-home
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The lead of this article currently states that Jacobs introduced the terms "eyes on the street" and "social capital". The evidence for these is not provided in the citations given, and some cursory research reveals that the latter term existed before she used it. Someone with more expertise in this area should correct the errors. - Sdkb (talk) 09:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect assertion in lead? 

message: Jane Jacobs was a major theorist in urban planning. Jacobs & Mumford have each been influential thinkers to whom I’ve paid some attention. Jane’s daughter, (Mary) Burgin Jacobs, has been a friend and one-time neighbor of mine. It was through Burgin that I had the pleasure of meeting Jane one time, decades ago. Burgin feels, and I agree, the contrast, in certain respects, between her mother’s and Mumford’s views has been obvious and significant.
I believe someone could do a good job with bringing in the contrasts (and criticisms) each respectfully had with the other.  Mumford's name is mentioned in the Jacobs article.  Since urban planning hasn’t been a major focus in my life, I wouldn’t be an appropriate person to do this in the Jacobs article (nor into the one about Mumford). 
Please, if you have the background & knowledge, consider bringing this contrast in viewpoints (and spheres of influence) into the article.Joel Russ (talk) 19:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jane Jacobs and Lewis Mumford