Talk:Stuckist demonstrations

message: See notices on the Stuckist website, www.stuckism.com:
:Low resolution images (under 600 pixs max. dimension) on this site of Stuckist artists' work or events may be used with appropriate credit (mention stuckism.com) under "fair use" as promotional images to illustrate relevant topics on Wikipedia. This site is Wiki-friendly.(Retrieved April 9, 2006)
:Texts can be printed, quoted and distributed, in whole or in part, provided this is not for commercial gain (without written permission), and that the text is unchanged and credited to the authors and Stuckism.(Retrieved April 9, 2006)
Tyrenius 07:39, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: :Image:Stuckist-Clown-2000.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Tyrenius (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Stuckist-Clown-2000.jpg

message: :Image:TateDemo2003.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Tyrenius (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TateDemo2003.jpg

message: This article has (or rather, had) way too many images. This is a problem because they clutter the article and distract from the text, making the article difficult to read. I've trimmed them down to a more manageable level, and the images I cut are listed below, for convenience. I started off by removing the pictures of leaflets, which I feel are particulary unnecessary – if the text of the leaflets is relevant, it can be quoted in the article (and I've added quotes from a couple of them). Then I removed three pictures of people standing around talking, which don't have much encyclopedic value. The remaining images were all perfectly appropriate, but there were still too many of them – for example, several short subsections had two images attached, sandwiching the text. So the last ones I removed (the last five pictures in the gallery below) were more of a subjective choice, and I won't argue if someone wants to swap them around a bit. Anyway, here are the images in question:
				
				
				
— DoctorKubla (talk) 16:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image cull