lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:It Ain't Over 'til It's Over

message: The Cutting Edge Soundtrack has a version by Rosemary Butler & John Townsend. Shouldn't this be mentioned somewhere? – kentyman (talk) 05:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosemary Butler & John Townsend Version 

message: I just ripped the cd and the metadata says this track was composed by Anthony Krizan. No mention of him here. Anyone know what's up? Thmazing (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer?
Talk:Hull Castle

message: Is there any reason for the different formatting of authors/editors? The References section uses first/last format while the Bibliography section uses last/first formatting. I would have expected both to use the same format. Keith D (talk) 22:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The on-line references are just done in a different sequence I think. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Author/Editor formatting
Talk:2002 NBA All-Star Game

message: Where is the logo like the other years?--Cooly123 23:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No logo?
Talk:NBA on TBS

message: As with college properties on the same company (like college basketball on TNT Sports) should this article be combined? Hoopstercat (talk) 00:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine this article with NBA on TNT to form NBA on TNT Sports
Talk:Baynard Castle, Cottingham

message: The posted image is described here as  
An octagonal brick tower which was once part of "Cottingham Castle", a manor house owned by Thomas Thompson which stood here until the late 19th century (the actual castle or fortified manor at Cottingham, recorded in 1170 and also known as Baynard's Castle, was further east between Northgate and Hallgate). This explicitly differentiates the picture from the subject of Baynard's Castle. Anyway, the article states Today, only the mound survives and A four-bay timber-framed house of circa 15th century (known as the Old Manor House) . .  still stands on the site. So, sorry, but the image is unrelated and has to be removed from this article.  Cheers Bjenks (talk) 02:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see. Sorry about that. Cheers, --Magnus Manske (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cottingham Castle" image
Talk:Ballymun Flats

message: This has a serious NPOV problem.  Phrases like "The regeneration of the area will transform not only Dublin's Northside skyline, but also the whole of Dublin from the airport to the city centre" and "but it was too little too late" present the destruction of this tower as an undisputed good.  That is not NPOV, and is not appropriate for a Wikipedia entry.
78.137.147.133 (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The flats were built by a consortium of builders, Cubitt Haden & Sisk. Stephen Moran (talk) 12:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Builders
Talk:Tranby Croft

message: The "Tranby Croft affair" is mentioned in passing by "M" in Moonraker, by Ian Fleming.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcencielltd (talk • contribs) 20:22, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Popular Culture
Talk:Ca' Foscari University of Venice

message: OTRS permission has been received at the above ticket releasing the text content of http://www.unive.it/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=164424 under the "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License. TLSuda (talk) 21:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  OTRS for text content of http://www.unive.it/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=164424 

message: IP  has made a large number of edits here. According to this whois lookup, the IP range   157.138.0.0 – 157.138.199.255 is assigned to "Universita' Ca' Foscari - Venezia". I've therefore added the IP as a  above. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:COI|COI]] IP edits
Talk:USS Katahdin (1861)

message: Replaced old blue ship infobox with new type of infobox, linked a number of Union ships as yet not directly linked, added intro paragraphs, Wikified text with para headers, See Also, and added a second DANFS ref, plus a few other minor eds.Wikited (talk) 00:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page 

message: Was this ship named for Mount Katahdin in Maine? Seems possible, since it was built in Maine, but I don't know for sure. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship name
Talk:Mouseville

message: Most of this is already covered in Eric Prydz, is this article necessary? Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 13:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Rational Business Developer

message: I notice that quite a few of the links on this page link directly to external pages (generally on ibm.com) instead of wiki links. Is there any reason to keep this and not change them to links to articles? Nachmore 04:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internalise links 

message: This page reads like an advertisement (looks like it could have been copied from an HTML page, links to ibm.com and all...
Nachmore 03:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Hobart International

message: There is a long, ongoing discussion at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks.  Tennis expert (talk) 08:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis
Talk:Motorola Solutions

message: Isn't it a bit odd that the controversies all happened before the founding of Motorola Solutions?  Shouldn't they be on the predecessor article instead? -- ke4roh (talk) 13:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies 

message: A UN report just found that Motorola Solutions Inc. is involved with "the supply of surveillance and identification equipment for settlements, the wall and checkpoints directly linked with settlements."
https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25542&LangID=E
https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session43/Documents/A_HRC_43_71.docx Gotrees4 (talk) 22:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies: West bank settlements 
Talk:African Stars F.C.

message: African Stars became the first club to win the first club to win the 1 million reward for the npl League in 2012 Mbahimua (talk) 11:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Sum 41 discography

message: There were a few other changes made by 70.242.179.192 other than the EP/studio album debate that I thought should be discussed here as well. Thoughts? Comments? Fezmar9 (talk) 00:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 1. DTLI2 is an EP which contains live songs. It is not a live album. there is a difference.
2. 1998 demo tape is a demo, not an ep. if it were an ep, it would have been called "1998 EP"
3. ATG/8YOSBT have DVD's along with them, which catogorize them in the DVD section.. 70.242.179.192 (talk) 04:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other recently reverted changes 

message: Can anyone explain the difference between "music videos" and "other videos"?  Why aren't these sections combined? - eo (talk) 13:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Explain?

message: There's a music video for "Hit That", that for all purposes seems to be a regular music video (as in: it's on YouTube's OffspringVEVO channel, and I remember it being passed on MTV). Is there a reason that it isn't listed on this page? —ljacqu (talk) 09:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music video to "Hit That" is not listed 
Talk:Brasil Telecom

message: rozana quem mando eu menter foi a janaina pode pergunta pra ela 
ass: nael  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.101.88.219 (talk) 18:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  84808845 

message: te amo bjos na boca 
me add no orkut  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.101.88.219 (talk) 18:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  84808845
Talk:Edward Mortelmans

message: Seems to be Edward Eugene Louis Mortelmans (1915–2008) . Charles Matthews (talk) 11:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparently died 2008
Talk:Lodomeria

message: ....and from 1772 to 1918 Lodomeria was officially a part of the Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria, in the Austrian Empire, although it only existed on paper. It had no territory and could not be found on any map.
This sounds a bit funny to me. It's not like the territory vanished into thin air after all - it still continued to exist, albeit under a different name and not as part of Austria[-Hungary]. Maybe something like:
....and from 1772 to 1918 Lodomeria was officially a part of the Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria, in the Austrian Empire, although in reality its territory had become a part of the Russian Empire under the name of Volhynia.
would be better?
--Dekthep (talk) 11:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording
Talk:SS St. Louis (1894)

message: As this ship was known as the "SS St. Louis" for the bulk of its career, and was only the "USS St. Louis" for less than a year, should this article be under the former title?  Although we do have the problem that the bulk of links to this title refer to the ship often incorrectly known by this name, the MS St. Louis. PatGallacher (talk) 16:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:Hasta Mañana

message: It was NOT a single in Sweden - so not a  #1 
It was #1 in a voting only Radio chart, Tio i Topp. This was not the official chart.
Please remove it as being #1 in Sweden (Coachtripfan (talk) 10:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweden 
Talk:Kawasaki ZXR400

message: This page should simply be renamed to Kawasaki ZXR400. Encyclopediamotorcyclium (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Harsco

message: There is a significant discrepancy in the financial information as the 2 reported figures for 2005 are incompatible.  The first listing says, "The 2005 revenues totaled $2.8 billion, nearly 60% of which were generated internationally."  The second says "Harsco reported total sales of USD $3.24 billion in fiscal 2005. As of 2005, its market capitalization was about $3.37 billion."  A corporation CANNOT have more sales than revenue - period.  There are various ways to get revenue, but sales "revenue" would fall under the general category no matter what. As such, there is an obvious problem with these figures and they need to be corrected.  Hopefully, this will not be done by the financial whiz that initially provided the information.  Regards.  Stevenmitchell (talk) 20:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Financial Info Cleanup
Talk:Governor-General of Ceylon

message: I have re added the flags of the Governor-General which have a Fair use rationales provided in each of them, I believe that there addition to the article will give it more meaning and insight. Nitraven (talk) 14:19, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't. If you actually had a section about the flag themselves and their symbolism, then maybe they could stay. But in this two line stub, no, keep the fair use images out. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 21:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags of the Governor-General
Talk:Intelligent Whale

message: The article mentions an 'only trial' and describes, it with no mention of a problem. Later in the next paragraph, it states 'After a failed trial in 1872'.  I think the article should mention why the trial was considered a failure (if indeed it was?)
Sejtam (talk) 13:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed trial?
Talk:My Secret Life on the McJob

message: Dwanyewest 23:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the problem is whether the book exists or not, but whether it is notable. The only link currently in the article is to a web-page about the author - but every academic includes their publications on their web-page, that doesn't mean every academic publication is notable; what are required are discussions of the book independent of the author. Has the book been reviewed anywhere, particularly in high-profile publications like the New York Review of Books? Or, has it been discussed in newspaper articles or on TV shows? That's the sort of evidence you would need to provide to show that the book is notable. VoluntarySlave 01:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I missed the links at the end of the article - the WSJ review does look like some evidence for notability (the Business Week one too, but to a lesser extent, as Business Week is published by the same company that published the book). VoluntarySlave
  The Wall Street Journal reviewed it Dwanyewest 03:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Presently this doesn't look very neutral: it says that the book 'has had favorable reviews', but quotes only one review.  Also the author is described as 'distinguished' but only his length of tenure is cited.  A case of weasel words?
:Looks like the author's PR people have been busy here. Chump Manbear (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?
Talk:Puget Sound and Pacific Railroad

message: Hello,
I have added the website link to the infobox but noticed it was already in the "External links" section
I am unsure whether I should leave it in external links, or just remove it and leave it in the infobox, 
Thanks. 174.21.189.134 (talk) 07:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the website link be in external links or the infobox? 

message: Hello,
I was wondering if there was a higher quality version of the railroad's logo?
There appears to be one on the website but I am unsure if I am allowed to use it,
Thanks. 174.21.189.134 (talk) 07:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Higher quality logo
Talk:Lakeshore, Ontario

message: Any chance we could get some history about the actual towns rather than just a bit of irrelevant info about a former resident? I mean, Mr. Cooper may have been from the area and may have a claim to local fame but there HAS TO BE more history about the towns than what is provided.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.137.37 (talk) 20:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:The Rock-afire Explosion

message: I think this article should stay separate. Although the restaurant "Showbiz Pizza Place" no longer exists, the "Rock-Afire Explosion" animated show still does. Showbizpage 03:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's been about a month and a half with no discussion in favor of the merge beyond the original proposal, so I'll go ahead and remove the merge tags. Rob T Firefly 13:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of article merge

message: Is the documentary section regarding the same band? --TimothyJacobson (talk) 02:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Documentary

message: It's an article about a fictional band, describing them as an actual band.
'Former Members- Santa Claus'-what the hell? I suggest a revamp or a delete.--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 20:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guys, really? 

message: Here is a link to some references that may be helpful for the article.  This is a Google Newspapers search.--Nowa (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The article has been tagged for multiple issues.  I think these are good points. I'm going to start a bit of clean up.  Feel free to dive it or revert as needed.  We can clear up disputes here.--Nowa (talk) 22:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Cleanup

message: What is the Wolf Pack Five? Is this a predecessor act? Was it associated with ShowBiz? The bios of five characters who were( apparently) carried over and rebranded mention this, but there's no explanation of what it was. WikidSmaht (talk) 09:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolf Pack Five
Talk:7 Television Commercials

message: Why are commercials so loud? 
I have to turn my television on mute every time a commercial comes on, is it due to change anytime soon??????  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.41.212.55 (talk) 03:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  television commercial volume 
Talk:USS Edsall (DD-219)

message: The ship was sunk in an action independant of the Battle of the Java Sea by two battleships and four cruisers. The Japanese had no battleships in the Battle of the Java Sea proper.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.91.1.43 (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle of the Java Sea
Talk:USS Wake

message: Since the Japanese transfered the ship to the Chinese navy of Wang Ching-wei's Republic of China shouldn't the flag of that navy be shown as well? If the United States acquired a vessel from, say, Germany, and passed it on to, say, Argentina, would we not show the Argentine naval flag?(71.22.47.232 (talk) 08:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service in Wang Ching-wei's Republic of China Navy
Talk:Ukrainian Radio

message: I have no idea how many hours a day it really braodcasts, but 97.5 hours is impossible given that the article currently says there are four channels. Meters (talk) 23:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 97.5 hours of broadcasting per day?
Talk:Joe Friday

message: This article uses IMDb as a reference, which is not considered a reliable source, and has been tagged since 2007 with an "unreferenced" tag. I was a big fan of the 2nd series (1967–1970) and watched many reruns of the first. I will personally certify the notability of the article. Oh wait! I'm sorry but Wikipedia does not recognize me as a reliable source. While the actor, and his fictitious character Joe Friday are not disputed, the article (on Wikipedia) being unreferenced, is disputed. I will try to find some references to "verify" the existence of the article. If this fails I will nominate the article for an article for deletion. Since I am not a deletionist, and considering the obvious notability of the actor, the show, and the character, I hope IMDb is not the only source. Otr500 (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References (or lack thereof)
Talk:Rokneddin Mokhtari

message: Is Rokneddin Mokhtari another name or a relative of Sarpas Mokhtari? It seems, that both were playing violine. --Georg Hügler (talk) 10:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-06-04/From the editor

message: If I joined ITN, could I get a 25% pay rise after the first article? - Ta bu shi da yu 00:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't guarantee 25%, but I'll look into it at your weekly performance review.  Ral315 » 03:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 0 + 0.25(0)=0 :) Cool Bluetalk to me 00:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  You weren't supposed to tell him that!  Ral315 » 01:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hapoel Tel Aviv B.C.

message: Hapoel Tel Aviv senior men's team (not club, women's seniors, youth or any other department) was disbanded on December 2009. The rights for the team's name etc. was sold through a third party to the supporters trust that ran Hapoel Ussishkin, which members decided to except the rights and change the clubs name to Hapoel Tel Aviv. As of July 2010, this move was approved by the Israeli basketball union. Thus, all relevent metrial regarding Hapoel Ussishkin (2007-2010) should be added to this article. If there aren't any objections, I Will do this myself in the coming days and make the Hapoel Ussishkin page a redirect page to this one.--ArnoldPettybone (talk) 17:24, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hapoel Ussishkin
Talk:USS Sampson (DDG-10)

message: DANFS does not have any information about the whereabouts or activities of this ship after 1974.  Is there another source that can be used to back up the list of equipment installed or upgraded, the claims of camel driver fleecings, particulars of test missile launches during refresher training, and qualitative assesment of the Beirut fire department's performance? eae 22:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ship's history after 1974
Talk:1972 Los Angeles Rams season

message: Not sure if we should leave the word dynasty on this page up, given that it's usually used in a subjective context. Yes, the Rams had two dynasties from 1973-1980, and from 1999-2003, but I would never expect to hear the word dynasty on a Wikipedia page. That word sounds a bit odd by Wikipedia standards. Painters Zrolyc 2001 (talk) 23:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynasty?
Talk:Morrison & Foerster

message: It looks like as if some idiot tried to optimize the layout for a 640x480 screen without realizing that the vast majority of computer users nowadays have screen resolutions at 1024x768 or higher.  My screen resolution is at 1650x1000 and this article is a mess!  Can someone fix it? --Coolcaesar (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout of article is all screwed up 
Talk:USS John S. McCain (DL-3)

message: The Destroyer Leader Assn website has changed, so the link has been updated. Also, the Navy's URL for its Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships DANFS has changed. The link to the JS McCain DL-3 has been fixed, but there are likely many others that need to be fixed.  Can a bot be created to do this?  --Blainster (talk) 18:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links
Talk:Showgirl (video)

message: In the special features of the DVD it is explained, that they show in one song the real sign language of the lyrics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.4.50.161 (talk) 03:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  sign language
Talk:Helmut Schmidt University

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
Hello there AD. Congrats on the RFA. Okay here is the DL. Great prose and it follows WP:MOS quite well. However, this article needs some work. First of all there is not enough information. Especially, in the entire history section. Second, There is a overall lack of sources, granted it does have some, but not really enough. Finally, and the real biggy, 8 out of the 10 notes are not exactly WP:RS. Need to get some 3rd party in there. Can't wait to see the final product. Any questions, feel free to ask. --Thε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 19:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I will try and work on it. Thanks for the review. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is little in the way of references to be done I am afraid. I suppose that this does not therefore meet the criteria. Oh well - maybe I will resubmit if I can locate some better refs. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but in the condition it is in, I have to fail it. --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 21:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 
Talk:The Real World: San Diego (2004 season)

message: Plz fix  to reflect that the 2011 season is currently showing. Thank you. 76.14.177.248 (talk) 02:05, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Jnorton7558 (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix hatnote 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support / Support also The Real World: San Diego (2004 season) (and for the others). The second option is similar to the way WP:NCTV disambiguates two TV series with (<year> TV series) and also more similar to the way it handles seasons in (season #), but with the year coming first as more grammatically correct (at least it sounds as such). --Gonnym (talk) 13:59, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey