Talk:Mount Le Conte (Tennessee)

message: Hello! 
Recently I wrote an article about a hiking trail along Mount Le Conte. Because of that I decided to add a page on the mountain, which at that time wasn't listed. Well, I added the page, Mount Le Conte, and doing some searching now, just found this page, which is about the same mountain. Even more strange, both of the pages are only about a day old. I'm not sure what the protocol in this situation is, but I suppose just combining the pages would be the best way to go about it. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Blinutne 01:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes that is very weird.  The time difference of only 4 hours in creation time is very ironic... Anyway, I went ahead and merged the two articles already, older one merged into the newer. I copied all of the information and then removed what was redundant and followed the proper redirect methods so the articles are one and the same now.  The article may require some more clean up, but I tried my best in the merge. --Phenz 03:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's pretty good. I do believe LeConte is more commonly used than Le Conte anyway, though I'm not sure what its official name is. I'm going to make a few grammatical changes and add a few small facts, but nothing major. In addition to Alum Cave, I plan to write the pages for the other four trails sometime soon. Thanks for the work you've already done to the page and everything else in the region. Blinutne 04:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The official name is Mount Le Conte: see USGS Geographic Names Information System Feature Detail Report - Mount Le Conte. -- Donald Albury(Talk) 15:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to quibble but "The time difference of only 4 hours in creation time is very ironic... " is not irony.  It is coincidence...ReverieHikes 10:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same Article.. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Mount Le Conte (Tennessee). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060622090046/http://www.gsmit.org/downloads/newsspring2004.pdf to http://www.gsmit.org/downloads/newsspring2004.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080102043350/http://geology.er.usgs.gov/eespteam/Mtleconte/ to http://geology.er.usgs.gov/eespteam/Mtleconte/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070831141446/http://mtleconte.com/history.html to http://www.mtleconte.com/history.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061218140144/http://www.smokymountainnews.com/issues/07_05/07_13_05/mtn_voices.html to http://www.smokymountainnews.com/issues/07_05/07_13_05/mtn_voices.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think it's time to reopen the discussion on the official spelling again. "LeConte" has clearly evolved into the most common spelling, despite the fact that the NPS and USGS have yet to start using this spelling. Bneu2013 (talk) 01:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling