Talk:United States lightship Huron (LV-103)

message: Not to overstate the obvious.7&6=thirteen (talk) 02:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, my reading of the lightship article leads me to infer that the picture of the "Relief" would not be of Boat #103, which was called "#103", "Huron Lightship" and "Manitou" during its service.  See the Terry Pepper Seeing the Light article.  Terry Pepper, Seeing the Light, Huron lightship. What do you think?  7&6=thirteen (talk) 16:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The original purpose of the ship was as a relief vessel.  The picture was taken shortly after it's commissioning as such....Asher196 (talk) 16:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article really needs a picture

message: When I cross 10000 bytes, I entertained the thought that this might be rated START class at least.  7&6=thirteen (talk) 21:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub class

message: In Shipwrecks of the 1913 Great Lakes storm there is an omission.
This lightship was destroyed on Lake Huron.U.S. Coast Guard on lighthouses and lightships.  It isn't listed, and it obviously should be.  It's being offsite was a contributing factor in the loss of the Matthew Andrews, which is listed. Barcus, Frank, Freshwater Fury: Yarns and Reminiscences of the Greatest Storm in Inland Navigation, (1986: Wayne State University Press) 166 pages. ISBN 0-8143-1828-2. See also Huron Lightship.  7&6=thirteen (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lightship No. 61 "Corsica Shoals" on Lake Huron

message: Not a stub anymore.  7&6=thirteen (talk) 18:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've bumped it to B class for WP:SHIPS and start class for the rest as I'm not familiar enough with their rating systems. You may want to consider trimming down on the external links section, however. --Brad (talk) 21:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've assessed it as C-class for WikiProject Michigan. In my opinion, several relatively small improvements would raise it to B-class: portions of the prose are somewhat awkward, the ship is inconsistently referred to using both female (she, her, etc.) and non-gender (it, etc.) terms, and the "Further reading" section is empty. cmadler (talk) 20:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This is not a STUB class anymore.  It should rate at least a START Class.

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on United States lightship Huron (LV-103). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121009041415/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1676&ResourceType=Structure to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1676&ResourceType=Structure
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Nine "External links" is excessive for any article but certainly a B-class article by presenting a WP:LINKFARM as well as not being in compliance with ELPOINTS #3. Otr500 (talk) 03:04, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links