Talk:Nauka (ISS module)

message: In the Usage section it states that "It will be docked onto the Zvezda module nadir docking port." however, on the picture it shows the MLM docked to the Zarya module. Can somebody clear that up please?
Thanks
:no, it is to be attached to the Zvezda module as with it's original plan. the MRM1 is attach to the Zarya. the confusion arise because "Zvezda module nadir docking port" is currently occupied by the Pirs, but they will move it to make room for the bigger module. 218.186.13.1 (talk) 21:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Once docked, the MLM will provide dedicated research capabilities to the Russian Segment, including an experiment airlock and European Robotic Arm (ERA) for external research, and also an additional sleep station, thus increasing the ISS’ living accommodation from its current six crewmembers, to seven. When coupled with the two sleep station “kayutas” in the SM, the MLM will allow all three Russian crewmembers to seep in their own segment, meaning a sleep station will be freed up in the US Segment of the station. This will allow for a four-person crew in the US Segment of the station, something NASA is actively looking to provide once the commercial crew provides come online with their additional seats. With three Russian, three American, and one international astronaut aboard the ISS as was originally envisioned, more crew hours will be available for research activities...--Craigboy (talk) 22:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info 

message: Rumor has it that the launch has been delayed again, this time to Spring 2014, will not add to article until we have a ref.Craigboy (talk) 18:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch date 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nauka (ISS module). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051030132756/http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/262/01.shtml to http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/262/01.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Major faults put the mission at risk.
The main concern is the main engine, which is currently nonoperational. Secondary engines were fired in an emergency maneuver to prevent quick de-orbiting and destruction.
Further faults are failure to deploy solar panels, no response from the docking system, response errors on attitude system and failure of an infra-red sensor.
RosCosmos, get your shit together! אילן שמעוני (talk) 23:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  On it's way to oblivion? 😔 

message: Nauka "successfully docked on 29 July 2021, 13:29 UTC to Zvezda's nadir port." Since the nom. of its launch was rejected a week ago, we probably ought to post the docking at ITN/C. – Sca (talk) 13:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:ITN/C|ITN/C]]

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:53, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: don't know why the structure image :File:Artists Conception of Nauka Module Structure.gif was moved out of infobox, when fgb (zarya) and zvezda has a structure image in infobox please give valid reasons for removing out of infobox Chinakpradhan (talk) 03:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I was hoping to make it easier for readers, especially on on smaller screens, to have the "Description" section illustrated by directly planting the diagram in the section itself. It would also relieve the length of the infobox, which was starting to get a bit too large. Do we really need two images in an infobox when one should suffice in helping the reader identify the subject of an article? It is the intended purpose of an infobox, after all (MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE). — Molly Brown (talk) 19:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  IMO both of you are right, but I think that structure is important and do belong to the infobox. From the photo of the module it's not really clear what are the parts of it used for, and this image helps to understand it better. Artem.G (talk) 20:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

text: hey i know that you need the page to be shortened but that doesn't mean that the logo will be removed . logo shows many thing that that are not seen and displayed by text and spacecraft images please do not remove the launch logo again. your edits created thing that have led the logo to be deleted. kindly i beg you all dont do this again. see tghe era page never removed era patch because it has value there. treat nauka logo like that only please Chinakpradhan (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nauka Module structure image diagram/ launch logo 

message: Section about Covid-19 delays seems to be very long, longer than most of the sections about module itself. Maybe it can be trimmed? , , what do you think? Artem.G (talk) 20:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I've been doing as we speak, actually! — Molly Brown (talk) 20:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks a lot! :) Artem.G (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covid-19 delays 

message: Is there only one porthole on Nauka Module? Later examination shows that though this is the major porthole. There are some minor porthole on nauka. So what to do? Chinakpradhan (talk) 08:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decision on no. Of porthole on nauka is one or more than one 

message: Nauka launched and docked in July 2021 yet the Cygnus that launched and docked in August is marked as already present during Naukas docking.
SherlockKamik (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Vehicles visiting the ISS at the time of Nauka's docking” graphic is wrong 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion