lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Richard Keen, Baron Keen of Elie

message: This seems to be a rather long advert for Mr. Keen
Lucifer(sc) 15:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first of your four tentative edits clearly demonstrates that this is most definitely not a "rather long advert for Mr Keen". I have therefore removed your seemingly unnecessary tag.Phase4 22:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Hi Lucifer. Have a look at the "References" section and I think you will find the Scotsman's Rich List piece is the source for the apparent lionising of Richard Keen. He's number 61 on the list.Phase4 16:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I've given this a long overdue rewrite. It was previously a copyvio of one of the provided sources (everything in that source about this person had been copied here, without any rewording), and it was so unambiguously promotional it was unreal. I'm hardly an expert on Law, and some updates are doubtless required; but this should be a major improvement. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: There are news reports that Keen today offered his resignation as Advocate General. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resignation 

message: I can’t find Richard Keen mentioned in the citation you added. Sweet6970 (talk) 11:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Scroll down, 10th on the list.Brattice (talk) 15:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I see it now (I hadn't scrolled down). Sorry. Sweet6970 (talk) 15:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Member of the UK delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe – citation
Talk:Business cluster

message: This article has been translated into Chinese 商业集群 MoJieCPD (talk) 03:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Porter´s Cluster and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 14#Porter´s Cluster until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 16:28, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Porter´s Cluster" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Cluster development should be merged into Business cluster. Although Cluster development has been around since 2005 and this page only (!) since 2007, they have always been about the very same concept, and should have been merged long ago. The content is complementary (different examples) and can easily be interleaved. Business cluster is the page that should survive, since it is linked with dozens of other-language Wikipedias, unlike the other page. – Justinbb (talk) 00:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:37 mm automatic air defense gun M1939 (61-K)

message: as this appears to be the inferior article I have modified the merge note to suggest that content of this article be merged into the other. GraemeLeggett 15:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me. Balcer 15:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i should have added that by by inferior I meant shorter, with less content and not in English grammar. GraemeLeggett 15:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: In the year 1938 Kaliningrad was called Königsberg and was part of the Third Reich. --Kievlyanin (talk) 09:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There was more than one Kaliningrad over the years, the one mentioned likely being the one near Moscow (modern day Korolyov)--172.190.66.90 (talk) 03:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1938 Kaliningrad

message: Was not this gun used during the Korean War? Methinks it was, shall find source.63.3.21.1 (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean War
Talk:Helena Josefsson

message: Ms. Josefsson has had a rich and varied career, and her article's sourcing should reflect that.  It currently relies too heavily on her own official biography.  Many other key details of her involvement with other artists are unsourced when they should be readily available.  Please retain the citation banner until consensus has been obtained.  Thanks.  GetSomeUtah (talk) 22:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continued need for sources 
Talk:Pia Cramling

message: A controversy has arisen because Susan Polgar, who was recently elected to the USCF Executive Board, claims to be rated in the top three women in the world, but actually this is not true because Pia Cramling is the real number three rated in the world.
FIDE has a new chart of "World Top" lists.
Take a look at the chart for Susan Polgar:
http://www.fide.com/ratings/top_files.phtml?id=700088
Now, compare that with the chart for Pia Cramling:
http://www.fide.com/ratings/top_files.phtml?id=1700030
As you can plainly see, Pia Cramling has been consistently ranked as one of the top rated women in the world in every FIDE rating list since these charts have come out. Pia Cramling is currently rated number 3 in the world, and has been so on the last several lists. This is because Cramling is an active player who plays in many tournaments every year and always keeps her rating active.
On the other hand, Susan Polgar has made the top women's list in only one year: 2005, that because of two tournaments in which she played in 2004: The Oklahoma Challenge organized by Frank K. Berry and the 2004 World Chess Olympiad.
Those two tournaments are the only two FIDE rated tournaments in which Susan Polgar has played in the last 11 years since 1996.
Thus, the claim that Susan Polgar has been rated in the top three women in the world every year for the past 23 years is absolutely false. I would expect that the Swedes will protest if Chess Life publishes her claim. Sam Sloan 23:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating controversy 

message: ive heard anna say on her twitch channel that her parents are not married. 144.86.215.204 (talk) 04:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  married?
Talk:Wynken, Blynken, and Nod

message: Disney(again?) --preceding unsigned comment by 71.251.231.251
:What does this mean? --MattWright (talk) 15:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My question 

message: 100px|left This picture is of the Wellsboro, Pennsylvania statue / fountain. Not sure if it would be of use in the article or not. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 02:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another image 

message: Poetry.org and poetryfoundation.org list this poem to a Eugene Field while Wikipedia credits Mabel Landrum Torrey. Perhaps it's just a mob manipulation on my END TARGETed to threatening me that Eugene Field only lived from 1850-1895 landing him dead at the unripe age of 45.  If someone has scrambled the internet, this is going to be a disaster to rectify. This nonsense needs to stop immediately. If papabear can't handle his Jacobs, then he needs to CALL ME FOR ASSISTANCE. You may not remove my discussion topic. Iomichighellanexplainnation (talk) 09:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship of Original Poem
Talk:Bob Love

message: After reviewing WP:Trivia, I deceided to put the section back in. The facts are important but relatively disparate. So, at this point, I think it is best to leave them as a list.
Secondly, I put back the man's middle name. This is not in debate. The man has a middle name and it is one the title of his book which is referenced in trivia section. --BlindEagletalk~contribs 15:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You obviously haven't read the book. "Bob Love" is his penname.
**Your defence of the trivia section goes against WP guidelines - you need to incorporate the "trivia" into the text, or delete it.139.48.81.98 15:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Respectfully, I don't agree. WP:Trivia is a guidline not a policy. Secondly, Triva not to remove is specifcally noted within the guideline. --BlindEagletalk~contribs 15:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triva and Middle Name 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Robert (Bob) Earl “Butterbean” Love. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Cnilep (talk) 10:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert (Bob) Earl “Butterbean” Love listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bob Lutz (tennis)

message: The tables for career matches appear to have some issues. The first table has two more appended to the bottom that are not in the table and all of them appear to have numbers out of order/duplicated. I have no idea how to go about fixing this (or if this is an issue at all) so can someone more experienced have a look at it? Yellowleaf23 (talk) 19:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Adjusted the singles table to Won / Loss, will do the doubles table later and look into the two added singles tournament.--Wolbo (talk) 21:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  , tables have been updated. Thanks for the note. --Wolbo (talk) 12:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables
Talk:Dielectrophoresis

message: Flow:
Removed selectivity from the article due to the word being used twice in the same sentence.
"Since biological cells have dielectric properties,[14][15] dielectrophoresis has many medical applications" -  And i thought, every material has dielectric properties?
In the Dielectrophoretic force section, the equations for the DEP force are not the time-dependant forces (as stated), but the time-averaged forces, e.g., see Eq. (3.4) in TB Jones, Electromechanics of Particles. This book is referred to in the article. This should be fixed.
The equation for dielectric force on an prolate ellipsoid says that r>l. That would make it an oblate ellipsoid. Which is correct: is this really for a prolate ellipsoid (r<l) or is it a typo and "prolate" should be replaced by "oblate?"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ganaren (talk • contribs) 23:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Bob Mackie

message: What's his wife's name, again? --98.232.176.109 (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife's name?

message: * "Sugar Ball"
* Glitter Ball (RuPaul's Drag Race)
---Another Believer (Talk) 00:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Drag Race'' appearances
Talk:Bob Mathias

message: According to The Great Guinness Olympic Games Record Book 1988 the result in '52 was:
1. Mathias 7731 pts.
2. Milt Campbell 7132 pts.
Which by my calculation is a difference of 599.
I see not only this Wiki but also the German and Finnish have completely different figures. So in stead of editing the bio I thought I'd ask whether someone could enlighten me who to believe.--Maarten1963 20:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bob McAdoo

message: Since I have received no response from the www.lakersplayers.org web site administrator and they have made no attempts to attribute their source, I am noting here that the site
http://www.lakersplayers.org/bob-mcadoo.php
has plagiarized this particular wikipedia article. Myasuda 14:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism by www.lakersplayers.org

message: Hello everyone, I had Bob McAdoo's sister, Pam Cameron, as a math teacher in the eighth grade.  Is there any way to put it in the article? I tried googling to verify it, but I know that she was his sister and I need verifiable sources to prove to others that she was.  Let me know.
99.94.173.1 (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:GER Class C53

message: At the moment, it reads:
"The J70 was the inspiration for Toby the Tram Engine in the The Railway Series by W.V. Awdry. He is is the last surviving C53, and is in regular service."
Should the bit about being the last C53 and in regular service really be there? I know in the railway series he is the last surviving C53, and is in regular service, but in real life he isn't. I think just a statement like "The J70 was the basis for Toby the Tram engine in the Railway series by W. V. Awdry" would be sufficient.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notsoboxy (talk • contribs) 22:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The part about Toby
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam/Shi'a Islam task force/Historical articles

message: *this can be expanded to have a good representation of the shia view --Striver 02:39, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Battle of Siffin]]

message: Just created it, half of it is the doing of User:zereshk --Striver 23:49, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Historical Shi'a-Sunni relations]]

message: Of course, another important topic. --Striver 03:52, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hadith fabricated by the Banu Umayyad]]

message: That one is high on my wish list, love to see in print that Sunnis have most their authorative hadith collections from Iran. And of course we need to include the Salman hadith in it! :P --Striver 14:42, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Iranian Muslim Scholars]]

message: Dont have time to follow up on this. --Striver 01:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Saqifah]]

message: Needs expanding using  --Striver 16:34, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Fadak]]

message: Needs to be created, about Muawiya -> Umar II cursing of Ali. --Striver 05:07, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Cursing Ali]]
Talk:Bob Miller (sportscaster)

message: This article has :Category:People from Chicago in it.  Thus, bots will check that category twice a week on behalf of WP:CHICAGO and WP:Illinois and add  and  unless you remove the category.  If you do not want these tags on the talk page remove the category from the article.  Otherwise you will be fighting with a bot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  17:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the WikiProject Illinois and WikiProject Chicago templates from the WikiProject Banners template above. Bob (I know him, so I refer to him by first name) is from Chicago, yes. But, and no offense to folks from Chicago or from the State of Illinois, but I'm not sure how relevant those WikiProjects are to this article now. -- Gmatsuda 11:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for helping out.  Computer algorythms don't always make the best decisions.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  14:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  project tags
Talk:Roche-a-Cri Petroglyphs

message: Are these modern or 400 yars old? Vandalism or part of the historic content of the rocks? DavidFarmbrough (talk) 05:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Vandalism done by soldiers in the early 1900s. Royalbroil 11:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Even thogh vandalism, I suppose it becomes interesting to historians now as it's 100 years ago. Shame they couldn't see what harm they were doing. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's talked about at the state park, but not in a good way. There's some bullet holes where they were playing around. Most of the vandalism is supposedly at the height that a person would be at if they were sitting on a horse. Royalbroil 03:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROMAN LETTERS?
Talk:Bob Moore (musician)

message: There could be three entries in imdb for him. 
* https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2517730/
* https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7432775/
* https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8018455/
Any ideas? 2001:56A:FA85:3800:8C5C:7434:8BE5:1EE3 (talk) 18:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: imdb links
Talk:Honda L engine

message: if needed i can get a picture of the 1.3 l13a1 engine and also i have various jazz photos. question is do you guys think i should upload the l13a1 photo? since we will start runnign out of space and give this article the bloated/crowded feel.
I think the "modified" 1.4 VTEC picture should be changed to a stock one. I don't think an owner modified engine photo should be used to represent the L-Series. Even if it is just the intake and spark plug wires. It isn't the engine as Honda intended.
Also, it would be a good idea to post pictures with the other engine styles. The european engines are much different than the American ones. As long as it is next to the proper article segment, it shouldn't clutter the page much.
I would like to appreciate differences among different engines. For example: in what differ 1.2DSi and 1.3/1.4DSi? Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seppstefano (talk • contribs) 13:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About the Pictures

message: Is the L15A1 VTEC first appeared in JDM Fit and Mobilio Spike in Sept 2002?--North wiki (talk) 22:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added in the article.--North wiki (talk) 23:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  L15A1 VTEC 

message: In the L15Z series, the L15Z9 engine is missing. It is currently used in the 2022 Honda WR-V (an lifted Fit, sold in the Indian and south American markets). It produces 120HP. I won't add it to the list now because I don't have any sources for the data (other than the engine inside my own car). 181.42.24.7 (talk) 00:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  L15z9
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam/Shi'a Islam task force/Afd

message: *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apartheid in Bahrain - created by User:I.Casaubon  —Preceding undated comment added 20:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Apartheid in Bahrain]]

message: *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic Bias against The Shia - created by User:Doc_glasgow
:*renamed to Misconceptions about The Shia
::*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misconceptions about the Shi'a - created by User:Sethie
Even though the afd did not show any consensus for merge, the admin has decided that the arguments for merge where better, and has decided that the article should be merged in the already to big Shi'a Islam article, something that make no sense at all. I protested and he answered See it and make your voice heard here: Talk:Misconceptions about the Shi'a
Renamed to Views on Shi'a Islam --Striver 00:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Academic Bias against The Shia]]
Talk:Delete Yourself!

message: Can anyone translate what Alec is saying at the start Hetzjagd Auf Nazi's? i thought it might be extra addition to the article Keiron22 11:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Looks like this article is using the wrong album cover (it is similar, easily confused; the artwork is basically the same, with a different title). Epigrammed (talk) 20:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album cover
Talk:Susan Collins (artist)

message: Please rewrite the article in your own words. Thank you. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 15:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Own words

message: I found the following listing at the British Library http://catalog.bl.uk/ , and think it might be worth mentioning in the article.
*Collins, Susan Alexis. Inhabited content : an exploration into the role of the viewer through the realisation of ’In conversation’ and other works. University of Reading, 2001.
When working on the biography of a British academic, it is often a good idea to use http://catalog.bl.uk/ to see what the academic has written. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 15:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inhabited content 

message: This user finds copyright paranoia disruptive. Artlondon 15:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright 

message: Collins organised the Tate's first net art -- http://www.tate.org.uk/netart/tateinspace/
recent article http://www.ciac.ca/magazine/archives/no_25/entrevue.htm 
:As the article stands, I'm personally quite happy that notability has been asserted.  I'd love to see more refs though.  I've tagged as many facts with the ciac ref as I can, but there's still one sentence that remains unreffed.  Can anyone help with the ref? Chovain 20:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: I noticed that the entire article is a copy of Susan Collins "Info" page at http://www.susan-collins.net/ (or http://ucl.ac.uk/slade/sac/info leads to the same page). Nominated for deleted becasue, looking at the above comments, it hasn't been improved in 5 years. Though Collins is not completely un-notable, it may not be worth the effort to try saving, unfortunately. Sionk (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the edit history we find the copyvio originated with this edit . I've reverted the article to the version it was before the copyvio. She seems to have some claim to notability so its not an automatic prod. There may be a case for deleting some of the revisions which are copyvio's.--Salix (talk): 00:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issues
Talk:Multiple-unit train control

message: Snippets I removed from Multiple unit in an effort to condense all discussion of MU Train Control here:
More commonly used in North America, the term can also refer to multiple locomotive operation. The driver's cab on a MU is usually truncated to a short room at each end of the train.
Before his successful invention, differences in the speed and response of motors on different cars of the train caused binding on the couplings between the train cars, wheel slippage and excess wear on motors due to operating gear running at speeds faster or slower than the overall speed of the train, or even derailment, as well as an uncomfortable ride.
Skabat169 04:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Snippets

message: Suggesting merge of  Diesel_locomotive#Multiple_unit_operation see Talk:Diesel_locomotive#Merge
as well as Multiple working into one "uber article".
What the best title would be?FengRail (talk) 20:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I think there is an error in the table at Railway Technical Web Pages. There is no numbered wire for "E" Governor Solenoid. Biscuittin (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in linked table? 

message: … is more akin to a rail enthusiast magazine that an encyclopaedia. Expressions like ‘they can be easily spotted’ is anorak-speak. 2001:8003:229C:DE00:CCF8:47C5:5A7A:AC35 (talk) 09:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this is a problem on a great many articles relating to trains and rail transport. Focus on spotting features and minor details at the expense of achieving encyclopedic treatment of a subject (in the U.S. we call rabid railfans foamers). I am slowly working on addressing this issue across high level articles like this but it's a task I won't have done for years. I'm very proud of how I cleaned up and improved Train but that and Rail transport are the only high level rail transport articles I am happy with the state of. As you pointed out, we are an encyclopedia, not a railfan magazine. But who's going to edit train articles besides railfans? (and let's be real, I'm one too). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language…