lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Warrior Woman (Marvel Comics)

message: Y'know, I wonder about some people on Wikipedia. This entry had an incorrect name listed for the character (Frieda Ratsel); it got corrected, AND a reference tag was added both to the real name's source, AND a reference tag was added to a reliable online source explaining both why Ratsel is a codename that people have erroneously misapplied as the real name, and that Warrior Woman's own creator, Roy Thomas, the man who also called her Ratsel, has confirmed this. So, of course, someone swiftly reverted the edit to make the page wrong again, and noted "what source?" for the changes that had been made. WHAT SOURCE? Why, those would be the ones in the reference tags the reverter clearly didn't bother to read or check. Venting my frustration here, and date tagging this, because if I was a betting man, I'd lay good odds that someone, likely the original reverter, will revert the info again to make the page wrong. 86.144.89.113 (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Aqueduct (comics)

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
Talk:White Rabbit (comics)

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Wyatt Wingfoot

message: So is there any reference to the Empire State University coach Thorpe being a homage to the real Jim Thorpe? I've no doubt it's an intended ref, but we need the ref. Lots42 (talk) 10:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thorpe 

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:TCBY

message: "TCBY is a world-wide franchise chain of frozen yogurt and ice-cream stores"
World-Wide ? I've never heard of it. It might be well known in the US, but I've never seen it in Europe. (I'm English but live in Germany). 
84.130.72.65 21:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "However, the product has also maintained its rich, creamy texture with the addition of fiber, something American consumers are told to eat more of. The fiber in TCBY's product also serves as a prebiotic, or food for the healthful bacteria in the yogurt, which boosts the benefit that live-and-active cultures bring to the digestive system." etc.
Can someone who knows the product and the company better than me bring it down a notch? And furthermore erase anything not relevant to the company? Its a simple company, nothing special. I am from Europe, I've never heard of it. As per company website, they have 360 franchises in the US. And one (unsourced) in Pakistan. Therefore you could also remove international/worldwide and make it "a US-based frozen yoghurt company". Should be fitting for a company that calls itself "the country's best yoghurt".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.234.12.105 (talk) 08:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest editing / reads like an advertorial 
Talk:Wrecker (comics)

message: Why is the original cover featuring the Wrecker's first appearance such a bone of contention? Good enough for the other characters.
Asgardian 09:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ones that you've changed, you mean. Most comics articles don't show the first appearance as the main pic. CovenantD 19:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted back to the previous image that was being used. It is larger, depicts the subject more clearly, and shows the subject alone without other figures. --GentlemanGhost 21:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As per the WikiProject Comics editorial guidelines, it is not required that the image in the Superhero box be from a comic book cover. In fact, the preferred source is promotional art. That is not the reason I have reverted the image, however. According to the guidelines, "the ideal image is a full-body, three-quarter picture of the character standing straight with no background". Also, "pictures which have more characters and/or objects than the subject of the article should only be used if the subject is the most prominent object - editing the picture, by cropping, obscuring and/or painting out the other characters may help to ensure this". Whereas I don't dislike the Thor cover, I don't think it meets these criteria quite as well. To really see the Wrecker clearly, you have to click on the picture to view the enlarged version. With the solo picture, that is not necessary. --GentlemanGhost 19:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, it is not required that image used for the SHB be a from a cover. No such preference exists. --GentlemanGhost 03:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

text: However, context is not what is desired for the main image for the comic book character articles. What is favored is an unambiguous, clear depiction of the subject. Context is more useful for the seconday images (if any) that are used to illustrate a point within the article. --GentlemanGhost 22:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Lifted from a Marvel site" is not the issue. All the images are "lifted" from Marvel. The important thing is to establish fair use. DCIncarnate's new image still satisfies the SHB guidelines better than the Thor cover. --GentlemanGhost 17:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:CLISP

message: The only reference is about a detail of the history in licensing, whereas the rest has no references at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.42.187.202 (talk) 22:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Not even close to enough references for most of the article

message: I believe Yahoo! rewrote it all in C++ after Paul Graham left. Someone else could confirm that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.133.215.4 (talk) 18:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Viaweb probably not still part of Yahoo! Store

message: What does "Viaweb was the first web application" mean, exactly?
:I think it means the first application that generated html dynamically, and stayed around as a server or daemon. At least the daemon part is the only thing I see differently from say a C or perl cgi-bin program that is instantiated temporarily for each request. Maybe we should mark this as source or citation needed, and until then consider it for removal. 68.175.118.95 (talk) 23:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Viaweb was the first web application?

message: It would be nice to have mention that CLISP requires Cygwin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.210.34 (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, while it is true that you can compile CLISP under Cygwin, if you look at the download files at sourceforge for pre-installed releases the ones for windows are mingw based, which means they are native windows executables and don't require Cygwin or the Cygwin library. The configure script in the clisp sources will work on a msys/mingw or cygwin based system. 68.175.118.95 (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cygwin

message: The intro section in the first paragraph says CLISP is a programming language:
``In computing, CLISP is a programming language originally developed by Bruno Haible and Michael Stoll for Atari.''
However its the second paragraph that actually clarifies that CLISP is a specific implementation of the Common Lisp programming language. To prevent users being thrown off track in the first paragraph, this can be better clarified with, for example, ``CLISP is a programming language _runtime_ 68.175.118.95 (talk) 23:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: intro section

message: I didn't know this became a GNU project.  Can someone add a date and/or a reference for this? Thanks. --Gronky (talk) 09:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did it become a GNU project?
Talk:Gil Hill

message: Failing as a city council member or being a film extra is not what makes someone notable. --UlTiMuS - ( T | C ) 21:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He was mentioned in the Beverly Hills Cop article, it seems. It's your call what to do with it from here. I'd prefer a PROD over SD, myself. - Kookykman|(t)e 21:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I agree that now notability is sufficiently asserted. Removing CSD tags. --UlTiMuS - ( T | C ) 21:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I oppose the proposal to merge this article with Beverly Hills Cop (film series). In addition to his role in the first two Beverly Hills Cop movies, Hill was also a member of the Detroit, Michigan City Council and a candidate for Mayor of Detroit in 2001. --TommyBoy (talk) 05:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not realize that the discussion on the merger proposal was already pending at Talk:Beverly Hills Cop (film series) and have re-stated my comments from this Talk page there, where I urge my fellow Wikipedians to share their opinions on the matter. --TommyBoy (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: We all know that 2603:8080:2E0D:4E00:C0C9:E2AD:7E7E:15A9 (talk) 00:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  He's enrollment on corruption
Talk:Evangeline Whedon

message: Does anyone know if this character was named after Joss Whedon? 67.81.60.34 02:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much like "Neal Conan" and "Shanna Cho"... probably. MultipleTom (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Joss Whedon
Talk:Ohio Light Opera

message: I think Ohio Light Opera might be sufficiently notable (see WP:MUS and WP:ORG) to justify an article, but this article needs to be verifiable, based on citable sources.
Since the New York Gilbert and Sullivan Players are a professional group that presents exclusively Gilbert and Sullivan, the claim that Ohio Light Opera is "the only professional company in the United States entirely devoted to operetta" is dubious. (Some people think Gilbert and Sullivan is not operetta, but the person who wrote the prior draft clearly was counting G&S as operetta.) Marc Shepherd 21:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the claim is demonstrably false based on NYGASP alone (G&S only, except for RoP, once and Of Thee I Sing, once).  Opera A La Carte (based in Southern California http://www.operaalacarte.org/oalc/index2.html) also plays only G&S.  Both of these professional groups are older than OHO.  I'm going to remove the statement.  I also added a bunch of internet refs, and if someone reads them, I am sure they can write more about this company.  --Ssilvers 22:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: All the info in the article is now sourced from the cited external links.  I think this is probably a Start, rather than a Stub.  Let me know if you disagree.  -- Ssilvers 19:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work needed

message: Considering the fact the OLO announces the claim on their website, I feel as though the phrase should be included. [comment added by anonymous user]
:This claim is demonstrably false.  See Light Opera Oklahoma, Light Opera Works, New York Gilbert and Sullivan Players, Washington Savoyards, arguably Lamplighters Music Theatre, etc.  -- Ssilvers 14:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Only professional operetta company in the U.S.
Talk:The Mystery of Al Capone's Vaults

message: *Since it appears the Pop Culture section has been resurrected by popular demand, I'd like to bring back a few Pop Culture examples from historical versions of this article that did not make it to this current version, yet are well cited. Four examples in particular - the Time Magazine article, the Titanic reference, UHF movie, and Colbert Report. See this version for details. --Mfactor (talk) 04:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: IMDB says "Vaults," as does a YouTube video of a promo for the show... 98.232.36.172 (talk) 04:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is verifiable.  I'm moving the page. Shiggity (talk) 04:24, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No link was provided to a Youtube of a promo, and neither Youtube nor IMDB is considered a reliable source. Numerous books use the "vault" singular title, such as: 'Television Talk: A History of the TV Talk Show" by Bernard M. Timberg and Bob Erler, University of Texas Press, 2002, ISBN-13: 978-0292781764, page 143. See other book and magazine results which give the singular title: , , , , , , , , , , . I found no result at Google Book search which used the plural . It looks like the title should be singular, so I will move it..Edison (talk) 20:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The books all agree in retrospect that it was "vault," but I checked the NY Times TV listing for the night of the broadcast and it said "vaults"  (	TV Programs Today ,New York Times (1923-Current file) New York, N.Y.: Apr 21, 1986 pg.  1.  ISSN/ISBN:		1673494 	Document ID:		119252912)	as did a Chicago Tribune article about the broadcast (TV tidbits...   Chicago Tribune (1963-Current file);     Apr 24, 1986;      p. 28;    1 Page. ISSN/ISBN:		9757782 	Document ID:		1086805312).  An AP story from April 1986 also used the "vaults' title. What is truth? In the broadcast they only opened up one concrete wall, with a rectangle of timed charges, revealing a void with some dirt and empty bottles.  Edison (talk) 20:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Vault" or "Vaults?"
Talk:Barnacle (comics)

message: Didn't Barnacle appear in Marvel Zombies? Either way, this article should be merged back into a more general Acolytes page. Lots42 (talk) 11:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Argento Surfer (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Electrolite

message: I don't see the point of excerpting more than a line or two of this letter. Plus, there's no direct link to the source, so I'm facting it. --Fantailfan 21:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2006 letter from Michael Stipe to the LA Times 

message: For a little while I put  because I'm working on release history, song meaning and composition sections; they should all be done inside of 16 hours. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction 
Talk:Piotr Włostowic

message: May I suggest a RfM instead of a revert war?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this yanking the page back and forth is not helpful.  I would like to see people discuss the reasoning for one name or the other here on the talkpage, rather than just reverting each other. --Elonka 20:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Peter Wlast or Piotr Włostowic
Talk:Kincaidston

message: What is a council housing estate? --Xyzzyplugh 21:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A council housing estate is houses owned by the local council.  For instance South Ayrshire Council.
See here for the Scottish council example.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdivisions_of_Scotland
Councils are local government sectors and council houses are owned by the local councils and rented to tenants.  There is usually a variety of stock and repairs of housing is carried out by the council contracters.  If you can't afford to buy a house, the other alternative is private landlords run by individuals or organisations.  The equivalent term in the US could be the 'projects', although there is not quite the negative connotations that the projects have.  Although that's not to say that there are no bad council estates.  Some areas are in a bad condition due to a variety of factors like poverty and a lack of interest by councils.  Many housing estates are made up in the UK of two and three storey houses, although there are council owned tower blocks as well in the larger cities like London, Glasgow, Birmingham etc.  The term 'council estate', can be a bit misleading as many tenants have bought their houses when the right to buy was enacted in the 1980's under the Thatcher government.  Hope that helps. Douglasnicol 20:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, I live in Belmont, but I certainly didn't start the article or put that in.  I just put the link to what a council estate was.  I guess it's more desirable than places like Lochside, though that is being regenerated, however, it could be classed as NPOV.  We would really need some sort of proof to back that up like property sales figures. Douglasnicol 15:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Fun Spot Amusement Park & Zoo

message: Who is Lee Wright, and why does his death have anything to do with this park? This information needs to be fleshed out and cited. Sometimes the end is only the beginning... (talk) 19:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lee Wright? 

message: Conrad and Rose Haney bought Hollies Follies park in the late 70's after selling a park in Michigan.  Conrad fixed the place up by refurbishing the existing rides such as the Ferris Wheel (Indiana's tallest for some time), the Tilt-a-whirl and go carts.  He also fixed up the mini golf course and skee ball game room.  He added the Scrambler, an arcade, bumper cars and kept the grounds up in top notch fashion.  I worked for him on weekends when i was 14 -16 and during the school year in the off season i would help strip the rides, number parts, scrape, brush and paint them and reassemble.  I learned alot from Mr. Haney.  How to handle customers, the importance of doing good work on maintenance, and work ethic lessons that would last a life time.  I do not recall how many years they owned it but it was never quite the same after they left.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.77.95.9 (talk) 19:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hollies Follies became Fun Spot in the late 70's.
Talk:Internal and external angles

message: "The sum of the internal angles of a polygon on a Euclidean plane with n vertices (or equivalently, n sides) is (n − 2)180 degrees."
 
??? Isn't this true only for CONVEX polygons?
:No. --Spoon! 21:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: definition reads, "..an exterior angle (or external angle) is an angle formed by one side of a simple polygon and a line extended from that side."
An angle formed by a side...and a line extended from that side:  now, wouldn't that simply be a continuation of a line and thus form NO angle (or a 180° angle)?
I believe this should read, instead:
..."an exterior angle (or external angle) is an angle formed by one side of a simple polygon and a line extended from an adjoining side.
71.209.40.102 (talk) 01:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  description of external angle incorrect, and does not match illustration 

message: I don't get it.  If I take, for example, a square (to keep things simple), it has interior angles that are each 90 degrees.  From this I intuit that the corresponding exterior angle for each interior angle is 270 degrees, since that is the measure of arc on the outside.  This stuff presumes that there is only one exterior angle for each vertex, yet that angle does not cover all of the arc of that exterior side.  And if we use an extension of a side to define these exterior angles, then in my drawing there are three exterior angles at each corner.  This single exterior angle seems totally arbitrary and defies the beauty of most Euclidean geometry, especially since it is so counterintuitive. 65.80.246.160 (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  exterior angles part is confusing
Talk:Cauldron-Born

message: I thought it'd be worth mentioning, in case someone wants to add it. That in "Battletech" (Strategy board game and precursor to the "Mechwarrior" video games), there is a "mech" called a Cauldron Born, and the information on the Cauldron Born in both Mechwarrior and in Battletech that it is named after the - quote "Unstoppable zombies of Irish myth". When in fact if anything cauldron born were more likely sourced from Welsh myth if the wiki page is correct. You can see here for a source
Check the bottom of the page with the descriptions. I'd add it myself but I'm not that confident with Wikipedia and would rather not screw it up.
--88.2.174.232 21:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battletech mis-quote on Cauldron Born 

message: "The Black Crochan" now redirects to Black Crochan rather than to "The Chronicles of Prydain"). I may consolidate further at "Black Crochan" and its previously empty discussion Talk:Black Crochan. --P64 (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Crochan
Talk:Misty Mountain Hop

message: I shuffled the trivia section around a bit, as it was simply ripped from the bottom of this page. Some of it was redundant and needed to be removed, and some of it needed to be integrated into the article. 
By the way, does anybody actually know if there are Misty Mountains in Wales? --Rosencrantz1 19:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:Andreas Gursky

message: Where is this enormous architecture you speak of? All I see are photos.... 81.141.82.192 (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   known for his enormous architecture 

message: is that proper english? seems rather like badly translated german...? 84.143.127.237 11:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   Today, however Gursky uses computers to edit his pictures 

message: widespread-confusion-photo-gursky-didnt-shoot/
This confusion may be notable enough to be worth mentioning. --Rwschwanke (talk) 08:23, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danger: 99 Cent Confusion 