lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Centre Hall, Pennsylvania

message: ----
I've been maintaining this page. If you know of any other landmarks that deserve to be in Centre Hall's page, please let me know or add them yourself. I check this page once every month or so for spam.
Things to add:
* Churches
* Elementary school. Most information about school system should be relegated to Penns Valley article.
* Mt. Nittany Inn: Include history, and separate fire incidents.
* Old Fort: As a small village (and no post office), I want to see history of Old Fort included in this page. Citizens of Centre County typically see Old Fort as being part of Centre Hall anyway. The distinction can be made in this article too.
Things purposefully omitted:
* Penns Cave. Penns Valley article would be a more appropriate location.
--CreativeEmbassy (talk) 17:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

message: it doesn't run thursday to thursday any more. it used to, but it starts on the 18th this year (a friday) and runs until the 26th. 
we'll be moving in our tent on the 13th (sunday) and i think we're allowed to sleep in it wednesday, waking up at the fair on thursday. but the official fair guide starts the fair on the 18th. commie (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  grange fair duration
Talk:Algebraic number field

message: The example section of this article says "The smallest and most basic number field is the field Q of rational numbers." From which one is tempted to conclude that finite fields do not exist. 68.167.188.246 (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, finite fields are not number fields. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 16:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nit-picking 

message: "Moreover, a power basis obtained this way can be turned into an integral basis: if the ..."
Are you sure about this? I thought number fields don't necessarily have power integral basis?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monogenic_field
93.172.25.96 (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right, I'll fix this. Thanks. RobHar (talk) 02:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power integral basis? 

message: The article has both forms Archimedean and archimedean, this should probably be made consistent.Wishcow 15:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archimedean or archimedean? 

message: Perhaps a disambiguation is needed because it may be confused with the field of algebraic numbers which is treated *here* --Little bishop (talk) 12:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: In Algebraic_number_field#Ramification it says now
according to the Lasker–Noether theorem (see above),
but there is no cross-reference, and these names are not mentioned anywhere.
Moreover, I do not see the most important property mentioned: that the ramification indices (as well as local degrees fj) do not depend on j for normal extensions. --Ilya-zz (talk) 06:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken reference
Talk:Algebraic torus

message: I'm not a specialist in algebraic geometry, but it seems to me that this article could be equipped with some less abstract definitions and examples.  An example of a less abstract definition might be a definition of some reasonably broad, but not the broadest imaginable, class of algebraic tori.  Say, for example, over an algebraically closed field, or over the complex numbers.  I presume one can do that without, for example, needing to use the notion of scheme.  Such a definition, of course, gives rise to examples...
MorphismOfDoom (talk) 18:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs some less abstract material
Talk:Anonymous (band)

message: The 3 position are in spanish charts, not in Andorra (Promusicae certification)
--Yandrak 00:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chart data incorrect

message: There is a picture of the band being used on the Andorra in the Eurovision Song Contest 2007 page.  Someone more familiar with the special fair use copyright rules should maybe see if it can be posted here too. matt91486 13:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Claytor Lake State Park

message: It is a nice quick overview of the park, but you may want to add in more detail about the park. A few things you could think about are: how many miles of hiking trails there are, the difficulty of the hiking trails, what you can rent in the park and from where (kayaks, motorized boats, canoes, paddle boards, etc.), more about the history of the area, add cool events that the park does - their summer festival, the Halloween festival, chili cook off, fishing tournaments, etc. 
You may also want to fix the third external link (VDGIF page) - I got a 404 not found error. Emilyn3 (talk) 18:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for Improvement
Talk:Melanie Marquez

message: I added this oil find/drilling: Marquez on June, 2008 visited her son, Manuelito, at Las Vegas, and announced the oil find in her Utah ranch. Parts thereof were leased by the USA government, for oil drilling. gmanews.tv/video, Oil found in Melanie Marquez ranch in Las Vegas, 06/04/2008--Florentino floro (talk) 07:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 
Talk:Equipossibility

message: The two concepts are certainly related to one another, and to the Principle of indifference. I created these two entries separately mainly because they were separately listed here (also here) as redlinks. Given that the both the philosophers and the probabilists listed them as separately needed articles, and given that they are indeed separate ideas (in my opinion), with equipossible a more basic idea than equiprobable, I'm inclined to keep them separate in the hopes that more will be added to them. Hence, I oppose the merge. JJL 01:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Inverse Galois problem

message: I found some constructions in Matzat and Malle (1999), and more in Jensen, Ledet, and Yui (2002), but I would like to see the original source. I looked up Hilbert's paper some 30 years ago and I seem to remember that Adolf Hurwitz was also somehow involved. Rice University has a way of sequestering its older books in storage and it takes some effort to get access to them.
Scott Tillinghast, Houston TX (talk) 01:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symmetric and alternating groups 

message: I believe the partial result attributed to Hilbert is actually Emmy Noether's result, using the Hilbert irreducibility theorem, proved in
Noether, Emmy (1918), "Gleichungen mit vorgeschriebener Gruppe (Equations with Prescribed Group)", Mathematische Annalen 78: 221–229, doi:10.1007/BF01457099 .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin McLarty (talk • contribs) 22:12, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial Results 

message: I do not see any links to the article on 'generic polynomials.' It is certainly related to this article. Scott Tillinghast, Houston TX (talk) 20:46, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generic polynomials
Talk:Alternating permutation

message: There seems to be some variation in the sources as to the definitions. For example Mathworld does not require c1< c2 for alternating permutation but Sloane does. I've tried to create the most reasonable compromise in which An is the number of alternating permutations and Zn is the number of zigzag permutations, where An and Zn are as used in Mathworld.--RDBury (talk) 15:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zigzag & alternating meaning 

message: Why is the number of alternating permutations denoted by A_n in Section 1 and by E_n in section 2? Also in the proof of André's Thm, "The number of ways to choose a permutation of {1,...,n+1} that is either alternating or reverse-alternating is E_(n+1)" should be 2 E_(n+1), right? In the second step of the combinatorial proof of the identity, "choose a reverse-alternating permutation ... of the set {1,...,k}" should rather refer to the subset of size k chosen in the first step (this is not necessarily {1,...k}). Similarly, the set in the third step should be the complement of the chosen subset. Right? -- Martin B. --85.181.225.53 (talk) 09:42, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation / Minor errors 
Talk:Absolute Galois group

message: Would I be right in thinking that a projective profinite group is a projective object in the category of profinite groups? I've just been looking at a definition (John Stuart Wilson, Profinite groups, p. 75) and this looks about right, but I could be missing something. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be surprising, really? The unramified part, yes. But this article does need updating. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:40, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would not be totally surprising, and yes the unramified (or even the tamely ramified) part are known with generators and relations, but they are not the "absolute galois group", so a citation (and possibly a correction if the full absolute group is not known) is required. 192.167.204.254 (talk) 14:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is the article of hight importance?KlappCK (talk) 15:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's a pretty fundamental object to study. Understanding the absolute Galois group of the rationals is ostensibly the purpose of algebraic number theory. I think this topic fits well in the list of other topics that are high priority in number theory. RobHar (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Importance 
Talk:Whistler (radio)

message: Technically, whistlers propagating below the local plasma frequency are not radio waves, but plasma waves propagating through the local charged plasma medium.  Is this technical detail too nuanced?  VoyagerLJG (talk) 19:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: The list of "relevant spacecraft" is out of context and should be removed. Drdan14 (talk) 23:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant Spacecraft Section 

message: An audio example would be nice, so we can hear what they sound like.  Vaughan Pratt (talk) 02:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Audio example
Talk:Amenable number

message: The definition in the article does not agree with that of  where the sum and the product have to have the same number of terms but that number does not have to be the target.  So 4 = 2+2 = 2×2 is explicitly stated to be amenable.  Deltahedron (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Pickover may have gotten his definition from an earlier version of this page or an earlier version of the MathWorld page. The original definition definitely required the number of terms to be the target. Without that requirement every natural number is amenable, just use {1,1,-1,-1,n} for the natural number n. This page was rewritten when the MathWorld page was revised, but some parts of our page still reflect the older version's definition. I will attempt to straighten this out. Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 04:51, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: Could this concept of "amenable number" have anything to do with the algebraic concept of "amenable group" ??
In mathematics, an amenable group is a locally compact topological group G carrying a kind of averaging operation on bounded functions that is invariant under translation by group elements. The original definition, in terms of a finitely additive invariant measure (or mean) on subsets of G, was introduced by John von Neumann in 1929 under the German name "messbar" ("measurable" in English) in response to the Banach–Tarski paradox. In 1949 Mahlon M. Day introduced the English translation "amenable", apparently as a pun.
Anyway, are these two concepts linked together ?? Or will there be nothing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.178.220.101 (talk) 12:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Template talk:Bosniaks

message: ==Untitled==´
The Bosnian Church of the Middle Ages is not a religion of the modern Bosniak ethnic group, whose ethnogenesis only came to conclusion in the 1990s. I won't revert because I know this reality is unacceptable to User:Ancient Land of Bosoni and it is a waste of time getting into revert wars with people like him.--Hadžija 01:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ample line bundle

message: I am in favor to merge Sheaf spanned by global sections into this article.--Enyokoyama (talk) 05:56, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How should the example here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1504206/example-of-an-ample-line-bundle-l-with-l-otimes-m-very-ample-and-l-oti/1505193#1505193 be integrated into this page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.17.182 (talk) 02:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to integrate this example 

message: I feel like it would be worth explaining why the nonexample is a nonexample WeiboEditor2000Sep (talk) 17:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonexamples of line bundles
Talk:Follow Me TV

message: Somebody blanked out the content about the Taiwanese station and replaced with the one which is now at Follow Me TV (Canada). I moved the Canadian TV station content over there and restored the Taiwanese station content. Sadly this meant that the edit history for the content is now over there. – Kaihsu (talk) 22:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Follow Me TV (Canada)
Talk:Taiwan Broadcasting System

message: Looking for objective information. 24.144.188.12 (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knowledge
Talk:Absorbing set (random dynamical systems)

message: This definition suggests that a stochastic process can never have more than 1 absorbing set.  I have reducible process where certain initial conditions may end up in one of two different sets, and once they enter, they never leave.  According to this definition, the union of these two sets is an absorbing set, but what do I call the individual pieces?  (I cannot call them irreducible subsets, as both still contain transient components.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.152.215 (talk) 18:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Annihilator (ring theory)

message: Annihilators in ring theory and linear algebra need separate treatments I think. Geometry guy 00:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please indicate which sections are the most confusing, thanks :)  Rschwieb (talk) 01:41, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing tag? 

message: what the heck happened here?!?! 70.171.155.43 (talk) 20:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The prototypical example for an annihilator over a commutative ring can be understood by taking the quotient ring R/I and considering it as a R-module. Then, the annihilator of R/I is the ideal I since all of the i \in I act via the zero map on R/I. This shows how the ideal I can be thought of as the set of torsion elements in the base ring R for the module R/I. Also, notice that any element r \in R that isn't in I will have a non-zero action on the module R/I, implying the set R-I can be thought of as the set of orthogonal elements to the ideal I.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.155.43 (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

text: In particular, if M = R then the annihilator of R/I can be found explicitly using\begin{align}
V(\text{Ann}_R(R/I)) &= V((0)) \cap V(I) \\
&= V(I)
\end{align}Hence the annihilator of R/I is just I. 70.171.155.43 (talk) 20:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is full of lies
Talk:Antihomomorphism

message: With matrices, another example of an antiautomorphism is given by the transpose map. Since inversion and transposing both give antiautomorphisms, their composition is an automorphism. This involution is often called the contragredient map, and it provides an example of an outer automorphism of the general linear group GL(n,F) where F is a field, except when |F|= 2 and n= 1 or 2 or |F| = 3 and n=1 (i.e., for the groups GL(1,2), GL(2,2), and GL(1,3)).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidLHarden (talk • contribs) 19:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Basic Example
Talk:Yenowine-Nichols-Collins House

message: viewing the location in Google Street View, it does seem that the bank succeeded in rebuilding the facade.
https://maps.google.com/maps?q=38%C2%B017%E2%80%B225.91%E2%80%B3N+85%C2%B054%E2%80%B258.4%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&ll=38.289982,-85.917205&spn=0.000674,0.001151&hnear=0x88696a62207e3e73:0x753176b9c88b91c1,%2B38%C2%B0+17'+23.63%22,+-85%C2%B0+54'+58.95%22&gl=us&t=h&z=20&layer=c&cbll=38.289982,-85.917205&panoid=RdOgEU4eTRH0xJ-m8Wo1GQ&cbp=12,67.46,,2,0
--VikÞor  |  Talk 01:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  rebuilt
Talk:Ancient Roman bathing

message: "However, gender separation was restored by Hadrian.[citation needed]"
Maybe not so much by Emperor Hadrian himself, although maybe that's what the author of that sentence means, but around the time of Emperor Hadrian. 68.49.138.170 (talk) 22:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the Citation... 

message: This article discusses the many facets of the bathhouses, which were largely recreational.  But, it says little about personal hygiene at home, which I would expect since the article is not titled "Roman Baths", but "Ancient Roman Bathing".  Didn't the Romans cover themselves with oil to scrape themselves clean?  What about sponge baths?  They had sponges.  I'm sure of it. 68.49.138.170 (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the practice of getting clean? 

message: hihihihihihhhihihihihihih  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.228.3.55 (talk) 09:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi 

message: I'm new to this, so I beg your pardon if I should do this differently.
I found a couple of valid links:
http://npshistory.com/publications/hosp/out-of-the-vapors.pdf
OR
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951p00953238a&view=1up&seq=3
I didn't want to just edit the page as I don't know which link to use.
Danketcham (talk) 20:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 2 (Out of the Vapors...) link is broken. 

message: Many classical sources discuss some of the processes of Roman bathing, so it would be great to add in some of these authors to the article. It would be good to add a section with some of these (Martial, Pliny the Younger, etc)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RPompeiiArchaeology (talk • contribs) 22:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classical Sources 

message: Would be great to have a section that talks about the influence of Roman bathing practices on the broader empire. Much of the article is focused on the Italian peninsula, but baths were important throughout the empire and had different impacts on different areas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RPompeiiArchaeology (talk • contribs) 22:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influences on the broader Roman empire
Talk:Central Dupon Images

message: thank you for keeping this page, I am a relative to the founder and would be a great tribute to her company but I don't have enough French grammar understanding to get more advanced information from sites if someone can help please do, thank youCircafuciX 01:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello.  My own French is pretty shaky, but I will see if I can help a little.  This company and its founder sound like important contributors to photographic art history. Best, Clicketyclack 06:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aperiodic graph

message: Refs please--Cronholm144 06:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

message: In the digraph "Image:Aperiodic-graph.svg" (at the top of the article) the caption reads that it has a 9-cycle. I take it that in this context (digraphs) cycles follow the arrows, so it just has a six and 5 cycle, correct? Pete St.John (talk) 06:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  9 cycle in the image?
Talk:Oxford Academy (Connecticut)

message: If anyone has any wikipedia expertise, feel free to add or make this looks a little nicer.  I'm too lazy to figure all this out now, but I'll try to work it up a bit better at some point. Whelk bucket 01:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Maybe there is confusion between the Oxford Academy in Cypress California and The Oxford Academy in Connecticut.  Please restore the copy removed as we wrote and own that copy from our website.  There is a comment that the ratio of faculty to students is not 1:1 but we identify the 1:1 as how we teach our classes.  There are more teachers than students so we can offer enough classes to multiple students while also running study halls and offering extra help. 68.192.139.112 (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  reply
Talk:Miss International 2007

message: I included Congo in the map of participants, as well as the table of contestants, hence, bringing # of total participants up to 62. Although the Globalbeauties list down only 61 participants, Pageantopolis considers Congo. And the country's participation is further confirmed by the Contestant notes section of the article. In any case, once Congo's non-participation is confirmed, please do take the time to also edit the map. Thanks. Joey80 09:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congo's participation 

message: The award actually isn't a special award. It is a award voted by internet fans and is not an offical award recognized by the Miss International organization. I took off the award on the article. 
Sam72991 15:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Special Award - Miss International Image

message: Since the winner is Miss Mexico, why is Miss Philippines listed as the winner?? 68.147.195.72 21:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Winner
Talk:Monte Davidoff

message: The article requires a major cleanup, but the subject is notable as he is something of an early coding legend. (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/11/microsoft_altair_basic_legend_talks/ www.retrocomputing.net/info/allan/eBook06.pdf). He gets around a quarter million google hits.Bigdaddy1981 01:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago Bears

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Super Bowl XLI has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Super Bowl XLI]]
Talk:Authentic Records

message: This record label is small and independent, but it is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia.  We need more people with knowledge about the subject matter to help expand it, since Authentic records has spawn a number of bands of notoriety.  Thanks! 209.59.32.70 01:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authentic Records 