Talk:Basil Wolverton

message: :Image:Powerhouse Pepper 3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Powerhouse Pepper 3.jpg

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. It has good coverage but it is really lacking in referencing so a C seems appropriate. (Emperor (talk) 17:59, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: This article needs to be considerably expanded by someone familiar with Wolverton's career. For example, I was unable to find on the internet any solid reference to his working at Fleischer Studio, but several minor characters in early Fleischer cartoons like Minnie the Moocher are highly suggestive of his idiosyncratic style. Also. His influence on the under ground comic movement of the 1960s was immense but is not mentioned here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.152.41.116 (talk) 00:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's always good to expand a notable artist's career with whatever relevant, verifiable facts we can find, so I agree with you there. The Fleischer thing sounds like supposition on your part, but, certainly, there's no dearth of information on the Fleischer studio, so perhaps there's documentation if Wolverton ever worked there. Regarding his influence on underground comix, if that's indeed so, some artist might have said this in an interview. Do you remember where you got the information about his influencing underground comix? --Tenebrae (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

text: An anonymous Marvel editor giving a personal opinion without any specifics — and there was a wide spectrum of underground cartoonists, so who and which did he influence exactly? — is not the same as a recognized comics historian or other authority making a supported statement. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: additions needed