lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Live Wire (Mötley Crüe song)

message: I added "speed metal" as a genre; it was removed with the edit summary of "nonsense." My argument:
*Fast-paced heavy metal song
*Riffing that consists of multiple, very fast-paced single notes (tremolo), a main staple of speed metal
*Consistent snare-drum backbeat that sets the beat for the song (characteristic of speed metal)
*Use of fast-paced, double-bass drumming (characteristic of speed metal)
Speed metal does not refer to only thrash metal or heavier. It also includes less heavy songs that match the aforementioned characteristics. In fact, songs like "Exciter" by Judas Priest are considered speed metal and don't have the consistent characteristics that this song does. Helltopay27 (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a difference between speed metal and simply playing heavy metal at a fast tempo. The main element that differs a speed metal song from a fast heavy metal song is that speed metal has a punk element to it. And this song has no punk qualities at all. GripTheHusk (talk) 03:51, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Punk elements formed thrash, not speed. I cite "Exciter" again, and the earlier "Tyrant" by Judas Priest. Both are considered speed metal songs, and neither incorporate punk elements. But even if using your definition, our own Wikipedia article on the album Too Fast for Love states that they incorporated punk elements. Helltopay27 (talk) 04:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: It doesn't sound anything like that Girlschool song, that section should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.0.32 (talk) 19:27, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girlschool
Talk:Battle on Shangganling Mountain (film)

message: This is a very awkward title. IMDb refers to the film as "Battle on Shangganling Mountain" which I propose is the title this should be moved to (other sites also refer to it as such). I'm not sure but I've also seen one or two sites refer to this as "Heartbreak Ridge" but I need to do more research on it. Tryptofeng 04:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move to Battle on Shangganling Mountain
Talk:Immunoglobulin light chain

message: "the total kappa to lambda ratio is roughly 2:1 in serum "
Shouldn't it be the other way around ? i.e.:
"the total lambda to kappa  ratio is roughly 2:1 in serum "  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.203.92.86 (talk) 12:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratio

message: I've just removed reference to "other mammals" from here - it was poorly worded, and seems to contradict what's said about camels (who are mammals, of course), in the "Other animals" section. Probably best to specifically cover other mammals in that section. - Snori (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  In humans 
Talk:Immunoglobulin D

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.[?]
*This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, (t) Josve05a (c)  21:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do 

message: How about its role in an diseases diagnosis? 109.206.137.161 (talk) 11:48, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as diagnostic
Talk:Ivory Tower (Harvard Undergraduate Television)

message: I'm going to clean up some of the self-promotional language in this article.  Also, I am going to remove the assertion that it is the longest running soap opera, which is clearly not true.  Supposedly, BU's program is the longest running college soap, which began in 1991. Justinkrivers 05:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shag Crawford

message: I have classified this article as a stub due to its level of detail and organisation. Capitalistroadster 04:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification

message: Davidships (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Shag"?
Talk:Lollipop (Mika song)

message: Is it worth mentioning that this song's chorus has a tune very similar to Lollipop by Ronald and Ruby? Geshpenst 12:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I only just heard Mika's song now after reading this page: Winners and Sinners. After watching the HK movie many times, it seems clear to me that the original author is correct in saying the chorus melody is a copy of the Winners & Sinners tune. Was this ever a big issue at the time this song came out?--Duffsta (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songs seems to be a copy of 'Winners & Sinners' theme song.
Talk:Soyen Shaku

message: The two references mentioned in "Selected Works (in English)" might actually be the same reference (both being reprints). I have a copy of "Zen for Americans", and in the publication information (immediately following the title page) it says "This is an unabridged reprint of the 1913 edition entitled Sermons of a Buddhist."  So I'm wondering whether "Sermons of a Buddhist Abbot : A Classic of American Buddhism" was another reprint of the same 1913 edition. Jtrbnsn 05:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Surely the correct Japanese name order is Shaku Soyen? 31.54.34.134 (talk) 22:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: see, for example https://youtube.com/watch?v=6I5iDZZ3xaI 31.54.34.134 (talk) 18:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  name order 
Talk:Isotype (immunology)

message: Not sure this is the correct title for this page, unless it is expanded to mention other types of immune system related molecules.  An isotype usually refers to any related proteins/genes from a particular gene family.  If antibodies are all this article is about, then maybe the page should be renamed Immunoglobulin isotype. Ciar 05:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is now, this article seems to confuse immunoglobulin isotypes and types of polypeptide chains. Since I have not been active in this area of Wikipedia I hesitate to make significant changes, but it seems to me that unless this article is much expanded the information in it (corrected) could perfectly well be located in the "Isotypes" section of the "Antibody" article. 24.36.35.188 (talk) 14:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).  WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: I propose that Isotype (immunology) be merged into Antibody#Isotypes. The latter seems to be more extensive and up-to-date. Either that, or the latter should point here, with only a short description appearing in Antibody. I suggest a merger both because the Antibody page is of a reasonable size, and because it is more likely to receive future attention over Isotype (immunology). Kwikwag (talk) 13:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Chauncey Starr

message: I understand he did importnat work on analyzing how society values a variety of risks. It will be good to discuss that work in the article. --Lbeaumont (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Describe his work on valuing risk 
Talk:Immunoglobulin class switching

message: Not sure if it is just my dodgy internet connection, but are the final three external links now dead-links?
Version of the page as I write this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immunoglobulin_class_switching&oldid=553640645
Cheers, 124.149.51.148 (talk) 11:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if anyone picked this up in between, but (again?) most external links are dead. I removed them. Lisiduna (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead External Links? 

message: What is the function of this switching with regard to the immune response?
108.48.193.229 (talk) 05:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  significance?
Talk:Richie Powers

message: The Wikipedia article prior to 3/25/09 noted that he was fired by the then Supervisor of Officials, Norm Drucker, "over two incidents that took place in 1978." I could find no unambiguous statement that he was fired, more that pressure was put on him to retire. The closest anything came was the New York Times article of 6/30/79, which juxtaposes Powers' retirement with the release of 10 referees (according to the piece, the number of referees per game had been increased in 1977-78 to three per game but, owing to costs (and against the desires of coaches and players), was being reduced to two again from 1979-80. This resulted in Drucker's dismissal of the "bottom 10 referees," which did not include Powers.Hariboa (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Powers fired by Drucker, or just pressured to retire? 

message: My Aunt, Lucretia Ra, was my Uncle Richie’s (Powers) first wife.  They were married Dec. 9th, 1962 in Brooklyn, NY  till 1969 & had no children. 69.115.42.93 (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richie Powers-Personal
Talk:Fly River

message: According to the Lonely Planet, D'Urville, and not Blackwood, discovered the Fly. So unless Ruszewski can find a reference it can stay that way. Nomadtales 05:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery 

message: Watch for claims that the Ok Tedi river is the source of 'one of the worst' environmental disasters in the world, as this is POV and sensationalism, It is a major catastrophe, which also occurred in the Strickland River but was less publicised due to the fact the Ok Tedi debacle ended up in the courts and the media spotlight. Many media outlets reverted and retracted reports that this was one of the worst environmental disasters in human history, as we have done quite a lot more bad things than just this! also, the poster of these sensationalist clams, please stop reporting that the Ok Tedi Mine is in the town of Tabubil. I have lived in Tabubil for most of my life and I can assure you the mine is actually a fair distance away! Please keep the bulk of the environmental stuff on the Ok Tedi Environmental Disaster page where it belongs, and try to keep mindful of WP:NPOV and verifiability on this controversial topic. Aliasd 07:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ok Tedi NPOV
Talk:Earl Strom

message: I have Strom's book and I'm going to re-work this bio based on information I come across in the book.  Hopefully I can get this up to GA status, which would be a first for a referee. RyguyMN 03:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-work article 

message: The article lists "controversies" that are little more than someone whining about a call they didn't like  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 20:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversies" 
Talk:Maryland Route 6

message: I just fleshed out the article some more, and after adding the Junction List, the counties traversed bit seems a tad redundant now.  Okay to remove? Kumba42 (talk) 02:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think the "See also" category can go too, seeing as the Infobox contains a link to MD State Highways already. Kumba42 (talk) 06:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No comments against, so I'm going to assume it's fine with everyone.  Kumba42 (talk) 02:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So I actually read the editing guide and realized how silly I was for removing those categories last year, so they've been put back. :)  Kumba42 (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove 'Counties Traversed'/'See also'?
Talk:Maryland Route 28

message: I thought that the eastern terminus of Md. 28 was at Md. 182 (Layhill Road), not the intersection of Md. 650 and Md. 198, and looking at the 2007 SHA Highway Location Reference confirms that this is the case.  The so-called 28-198 Connector (a/k/a Norbeck Road Extended) is part of the Montgomery County system (CO7445 according to the HLR). Cpzilliacus (talk) 02:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Md. 28 does not reach the intersection of Md. 198 & Md. 650
Template talk:User wikipedia/RC Patrol

message: This userbox template (and all others) should be semi-protected. This page should be edited by registered users only; it does not concern anonymous users who do not have user pages and userboxes.
- Kevin23 06:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protection

message: The template is being done in sanskrit language and I need to add that link in this page. Can anybody help me on adding that link in this page?? It will be useful for users in other languages also. sbblr0803(Abhirama) (talk) 13:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of other languages to this page 

message: :Category:Wikipedia patrols is not needed in this userbox. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Tra (Talk) 13:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove category 

message: Please add :fa:الگو:کاربر ویکی‌پدیا/گشت تغییرات اخیر as interwiki. (I would also suggest to move them to a documentation sub-page)
-- Dalba 19 Azar 1391/ 18:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: subpage created. Monty845 19:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 9 December 2012
Talk:Maryland Route 33

message: I see that this and MD 17 switched numbers in 1940, but there's no mention of why. —Wrathchild (talk) 17:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I believe, the current MD 17 once connected to VA 17 (now VA 287) at the Virginia border, so the switch was for number continuity from VA 17 to MD 17. Dough4872 17:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. Thanks. Would that information be worth adding to MD 17 (assuming a source can be found)? —Wrathchild (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Try looking for a reliable source and feel free to add it. Dough4872 18:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the switch? 

message: How best to word the sentences about the bridge being the busiest? When I read the article I immediaetly thought of vehicle traffic, of which is has very little compared to many bridges, but obviously it means marine traffic. Beach drifter (talk) 13:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I clarified the sentence so it refers to being busiest in terms of bridge openings. Dough4872 21:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Busiest bridge
Talk:Maryland Route 79

message: As this route is no longer 1 mile long, it needs to be merged into the route list for MD highways less than 1 mile long... Famartin (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Dough4872 00:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  time to make this a redirect
Talk:Service à la française

message: We could really use an image in the article. It would almost seem vital with the subject. Even if just a diagram.--Mark Miller (talk) 23:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture is worth a thousand words 
Talk:Maryland Route 197

message: The article states that "The highway was extended south to US 301 in the mid-1950s." without a source.    The road was Collington Road, which is significantly (~100 years or more) older than that, serving Collington, Maryland.    Sounds like someone is making stuff up for the article.  The Dissident Aggressor 19:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact is cited in the history section. Also, "the highway" is referring to the MD 197 designation being extended, not Collington Road. Dough4872 23:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. That makes sense.  The Dissident Aggressor 20:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension
Talk:Charles Street (Baltimore)

message: This information is clearly available to the reader elsewhere in the text. What do others think. Sebwite (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been thinking it's unnecessary for a while now, but apparently it's used to show how many miles of a route is located within each of the counties it passes through.  I've been following that example (as seen on the US 50 article), and the Tasks section in the MD Roads subproject seems to list it as important.  —Onore Baka Sama(speak | stalk) 03:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I just changed the name of this section to "Jurisdictions traversed," as the City of Baltimore is an independent city and not a county, nor located within in one.  Dcflyer (talk) 16:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the section completely per a discussion I started on the main project page.  Thank you for making note of that, though; it's another reason why the idea of the section is a little clunky.  —Onore Baka Sama(speak | stalk) 13:39, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "Counties transversed"section needed? 
Talk:Maryland Route 216

message: The junction list, before I edited it, did not conform to the standards for exit lists; shields were all over the place, for one thing.  For that reason, I don't see why the tag was removed, especially for the reason that was given in the edit description—"this is not a controlled-access highway having exit numbers".  The tag is not there to upgrade the highway into a freeway; it's there to clean up the junction list and make it conform to the standards.  —Onore Baka Sama(speak | stalk) 18:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the attention-elg tag
Talk:Maryland Route 279

message: The junction list needs to be formatted as a table per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (exit lists).-Jeff (talk) 13:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article in need of attention

message: I am seeing "the highway continues as Elkton Road" when it hits the Delaware state line.  In the DE 2 article (DE 2 having been shortened and no longer reaching Maryland), I linked to a Newark Post article which says that Delaware route number 279 was to be assigned to that part of Elkton Road (from the state line) which otherwise is left without a route number.
I found no DE 279 signs yesterday after having driven the now-shortened DE 2.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  is to connect to DELAWARE 279
Category talk:Pathologists

message: The subcatagorization by nationality doesn't seem to be very popular. Wouldn't it make more sense to subcatagorize by area of expertise and/or era? When I'm looking for info about doctors or scientists, I'm usually more intersted in what they discovered than what country they were born in. RustavoTalk/Contribs 06:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternatives to subcatagorization by nationality
Talk:Itami

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Jerm (talk) 23:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Itami, Hyōgo →  – no disambiguation. Gryffindor (talk) 22:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 January 2022
Talk:Maryland Route 299

message: I find: "During the 1950s, MD 299 extended to the Delaware state line in Warwick, replacing MD 282."
This would have connected to what is now DE 299.  However, MD 299 was then cut back, and MD 282 again reached the state line where DE 299 also reaches it.  Does someone want to comment on this?  I don't remember back far enough to comment on it myself.  As it stands now, MD 299 is relatively close to -- but does NOT connect to -- DE 299.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to DE 299?
Talk:Maryland Route 284

message: I'm sorry this took so long.  I had a look at the article, compared it with other similar offerings, and decided to fail it on GA criterion 3)Broad in coverage.  I took advice on this, I don't like failing articles (usually I tend to do so on a lack of referencing, or progress).  The article is very small, and while there are no rules that set a minimum size for GA I would at least have expected to see some detail on what existed before the road was built, why it was built, what material it was/is made from, what traffic uses it, etc.  You are of course free to re-nominate, but I would guess the reason its been up for nomination for so long is its lack of coverage of the subject. Parrot of Doom (talk) 15:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, this route is probably too short and unnotable to have its own article. It would better fit in List of minor Maryland state highways. Dough4872 (talk) 23:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA
Talk:Maryland Route 351 (2003–2014)

message: The following was posted in the article: "This description refers to MD 351 and the description of MD 351 refers to MD 180.  This does nothing to define where either of these roads terminate.  Can the point between them be defined better?".-Jeff (talk) 12:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing description

message: According to the 2013 Rand McNally Road Atlas (Large Scale edition), SR 351's northern terminus is at US 15/US 340 & SR 180. Is this correct?  Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 02:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the HLR from the MDSHA has the northern terminus at I-70/MD 180. The HLR should be used over Rand McNally. Dough4872 02:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern terminus 

message: Latest Frederick County map from MSHA has 351 resurrected.  
http://www.roads.maryland.gov/Location/2015%20Frederick_HLR_web.pdf
Does anyone know if this is in error, or if its truly back? Famartin (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back from the dead, or MSHA error?
Talk:James Strachan (ice hockey)

message: "James Strachan" is also the name of a Java computer developer. See Groovy (programming language)#History. Plinth molecular gathered 17:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another James Strachan 

message: Hasn't anybody even a year of death? Or is he the oldest man alive?-ospalh (talk) 21:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still alive?