Talk:Fântâna Albă massacre

message: ::::ATTENTION ADMINISTRATORS-this entire thread is nothing but WP:FORUM violation and should be 'hatted' please ... 
Looking at the last edits and reading the ethnicity of their authors (from their names and pages), one is put in face of an eternal truth: it is in face of real danger (like totalitarian ideologies and regimes) that people see how small are the divisions between them, and how these uncleared issues help the evel (e.g. totolitarianism) devide and hence weaken people. I always wanted to understand what was in the minds and souls of the Romanian sudents who in 1956 supported the Hungarian revolution, for which they were arrested, and some even executed. Now I understand, those students knew something the rest of us only now start to understand: there is no such thing as Hungarian cause or Romanian cause, to defend the truth everyone should rise. :Dc76\talk 21:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (ignoring nonsensical argument below), nicely put Dc76. :) I completely agree. :) K. Lásztocska 22:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: spreading lies will really help improve you image.Anonimu 22:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for reminding us who promoted and promotes Hungarian-Romanian hatred. People do learn a lot from facing extremism and dictarure. They become better people. The existence of the people that promote extremism like you is a necessary evil. :Dc76\talk 22:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Should I put a link to WP:NPA in my signature?Anonimu 22:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not attacking you, but your promotion of an extremist idiology. I do accept your personal right to support it, but I has been always against promotting it. I think you understand very well. :Dc76\talk 22:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also strongly against your promotion of 189th century nationalism and other "values" and "facts" supported mainly by the extreme right movements. So we're even.Anonimu 22:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean 19th century, buddy. Nationalism was almost unheard of until the French Revolution in the LATE 18th century. Nationalism isn't exclusively the property of the far-right, by the way. K. Lásztocska 22:54, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it is. Just look at Ceausescu: a right extremist ruling over a socialist system.Anonimu 22:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Logical fallacy. The existence of far-right nationalists does not mean that everyone who considers themself a nationalist is far-right. I could expound on various philosophies of nationalism and patriotism and the good and bad variants thereof, but you would just deliberately ignore it. K. Lásztocska 23:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, please, not the greek&romans shit. In modern politics nationalist є far-right.Anonimu 23:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: well, come to think of it, I have always felt a little out of my century...K. Lásztocska 23:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Opposing communism is an extreme right movement? That is exactly what Stalin wanted all along: who is not communist, is fascist. :Dc76\talk 22:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The way you're doing it, yes.Anonimu 22:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You simply enjoy calling people that disagree with you fascist. I told you before, and I am telling you again: you lack some education. :Dc76\talk 23:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I missed those classes that should have indoctrinated me into believing there's a general conspiracy against my nation/ethnicity/religion/race/(other unfair ways to divide people).Anonimu 23:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Not again that "fascism is socialism" sophistry. from the extreme right to the extreme left everybody considers fascism a far right ideology. for God's sake, even Mussolini, the one who imposed it on the world scene. thought that. stop making a fool of yourself.Anonimu 00:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Dear Anon. By the Soviets, by the communists, not by the Russians. By specific Hungarian irredentists, not by Hungarians in general. There were many anti-Communist Russians. There were many non-irredentist Hungarians. I hope you don't hate them, too. Dc76\talk 14:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: small observation

message: Tha Fantana Alba massacre as well as other massacres made by Soviet army in Eastern Europe are totally ignored in France. Somebody should take care of writing an article on this topic for French Wikipedia.--Deguef (talk) 16:38, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: A French version needed

message: I find an unwanted oversimplification in the following passage:
As a result of emigration and killings, the Romanian population of Chernivtsi region dropped by more than 75,000 between the Romanian 1930 census and the first Soviet census of 1959. 
The most evident reason of "Romanian population" decline in the censuses is that many people simply identified themselves "Moldovans", "Ukrainians" or "Russians" rather than Romanians. Voluntarily or not. This is a common demography trend for any country. Whatever the Western scholar has noted. Happy edits, Ukrained (talk) 23:36, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe that is the case here (that Romanians were merely renamed). It is well-documented that Soviet records called Romanians in Moldova "Moldovans", while in Ukraine they called Romanians "Romanians." What the numbers mean in both censuses is consistent, that is, there was a true drop in Romanian population. VєсrumЬа ►TALK 05:12, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanian population decline