Talk:Junaid Jamshed

message: :Jamshed has been accused by many inner circles in Pakistan ...
Please add sources for this (and the following sentences). Currently, it is nothing but a point of view. Who are the "inner circles", and where is a source for the claim of the criticism? Thanks for adding it, Ibn Battuta 23:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Salaam, I added this article to the Islamic Scholar's group here. I am making the assumption that you are somewhat new to beginning articles in this Wikipedia. Please, if you have any questions, visit my talk page! I have been working on the Yusuf Islam article, as my interest is in the biographies of musicians. I wish to point out a few errors here:
*When you list hit SONGS, you only put quote marks like "this" on the songs. When you discuss a ALBUM (CD or DVD too), you use these two marks around the album. I tried to fix some at the introduction, but am not familiar with the songs.
*All statements of FACT must have a REFERENCE. You must prove it happened. You must state the source, date, and do it so it is clear and understandable. For example, if the person had a very popular hit song, you must prove it, saying what credible newspaper, website (not his), book, or magazine proved that it is true. I will show you how if you ask. 
*Nothing may be listed, the way the music is listed on the site, telling people where they can buy it. This is an encyclopedia. It can not be used for commercial purposes, even to just let someone know. Later when you make pages for each album, you can provide the link to the website where people can find it, but not on the main page. Let me know if you wish some help, checking grammar, or whatever you need. --leahtwosaints (talk) 00:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of page 

message: I've undone the image removal edit. why was it removed? Muhammad Hamza (talk) 20:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: The article Mehboob-e-Yazdaan has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:A search for references found LOTS of self promotation web pages, and no published (gBooks) references, no mention of notability in article fails WP:N.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Mehboob-e-Yazdaan]]

message: This blasphemy allegation is very emotionally charged and it will need calm and dispassionate handling by Wikipedia editors. It is still in progress; it's unfolding as we speak. So we should refrain from reaching conclusions not found in the sources or based on our own point of view. As editors we need to be objective. We also need to write in careful, neutral and correct English and provide reliable, authoritative, and neutral third-party sources. Pleased discuss the changes you want to make on this talk page before you add them on the Jamshed bio page itself. A neutral point of view is absolutely essential. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 12:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I repeat: it cannot be stated or implied that Jamshed HAS committed blasphemy. It is just an ALLEGATION at this stage. Thus, the section can't be titled "Blasphemy". Please don't start an edit war on this issue. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

text: I don't think Facebook passess WP:IRS. Reports of what he did or said on Twitter/Facebook on secondary sources would be acceptable. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegation of blasphemy 

message: I've carefully watched Jamshed's video and he apologises tearfully for unintentionally causing distress and controversy, and he begs forgiveness for making mistakes of interpretation, but he does NOT admit blasphemy. I'd like other editors' views on this please. The video can be seen here: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2bna68_junaid-jamshed-apologizes-for-his-remarks-about-hazrat-bibi-ayesha-r-a_people George Custer's Sabre (talk) 09:39, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am also a native Urdu speaker. I disagree entirely with your translation. But just in case you think I'm a liar or mistaken, please look at an alternative translation on this site: http://www.muftisays.com/blog/Muadh_Khan/3797_03-12-2014/junaid-jamshed-allegedblasphemy-amp-repentance.html  You will see that Jamshed does NOT admit blasphemy. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly is "Daily Motion"? MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:48, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

text:  With respect, TheKnightoftheHeart, Wikipedia policy errs on the side of caution regarding controversial claims about a living person. If Jamshed clearly admits to blasphemy, and not merely to making a deeply regretted mistake, or if a judicial body convicts him of blasphemy, then that will be included in the article (with a reliable source). But we can't yet even agree that he admitted blasphemy. I provided an alternative translation. So did another editor. And my own listening of the video hears something different in this regard to what you hear. So it's reasonable to leave the claim out until it is established more reliably. I am not your opponent. I am not defending Jamshed. I merely want a reliable, neutral and well-referenced page that contains no potentially harmful claims about a living person. Salam and regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 10:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

text:  I have not defended my viewpoint based on my own translation, I'd like you to mind that, but I did that based on your own source's translation. The living person has himself said in the clearest words, about his own words in the blasphemy, saying "which were against the grandeur and status of such a personality, it was my mistake." These are the words per your own source's translation, not mine, just contend how the same words as quoted do not fall in the definition of blasphemy. Blasphemy is "contemptuous or any act or speech 'against the honor of God or a sacred entity'", or is it not? The commission of blasphemy is very much there, proven by your own source. I am against the mentioning of apology, but that is my own view, yet I keep that aside in order to be more neutral; what you deem is controversial should not be unilaterally regarded as controversial alone. When the living person himself has officially admitted something, it should be made part of the Wikipedia page. So I propose and will not back out from this position that both the apology part as well as admission of committing blasphemy on the part of the living person, mind it, not the conviction of blasphemy, should stay on the page. I have not made part of the page the conviction of blasphemy which is a matter that has to be decided by the relevant court of law and the same procedure is barred by the Wikipedia rules of editing, I have mentioned only the admission of blasphemy on the part of the living person that he has, himself, "officially", made, which is very well-referenced. TheKnightoftheHeart (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Confession" of blasphemy? 

message: I've just gone through the article and made a whole bunch of changes. Some of them were related to the blasphemy allegations, but most of them were just generally sorting out this mess; the level of promotion in the language used was ridiculous, and is still pretty high. I've also sorted out most of the references, but there are some that don't really correspond to this article. In short, this article needs a lot of work to be even remotely neutral. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:52, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dear Lukeno94, I couldn't agree more. It's still a sloppy article. When time permits I'll try to carry on your good work on it. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 04:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving forward 

message: All reliable sources are stating 'feared dead'. It's wrong to declare him dead on Wikipedia article based on assumption. It'd be better to wait for official confirmation.  sami  talk 13:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should add "Jamshed among those feared dead in PIA Flight 661. --Saqib (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Death' 

message: Add his religion. I'm sure he would have wanted people to know that he is a MUSLIM!!! Add it in the box on the right as soon as you open the page. 2A02:C7F:8204:8600:3C85:FA9E:AD84:6297 (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: -I'm not sure about the motives served by the said change.Aru@baska❯❯❯   Vanguard 17:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

text: Not done: Religion mentions in infoboxes is only for people where the religion is a substantial impact on their notability. 🔯 Sir Joseph 🍸(talk) 19:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2016 

message: I have Late Junaid Jamsheds autograph which i want to share on here. Im unable to due to this page having protection now. How can i share? Muslimm786 (talk) 02:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autograph 

message: Under the Death heading it states "He is survived by his first wife Ayesha, three sons, and a daughter". He only had ONE wife, and his wife passed away with him. Please make the correct edits!
Thank you Zohra 123 (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death  

message: Please remove the quote from the interview with Shoaib Mansoor in 2007, it defies the name of islam ,and suggests him leaving music was a bad thing. it defies the name of islam and such a thing should be removed. Sid n (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: the quotation appears correct and is not WP:UNDUE - to remove it would only be for PoV purposes - Arjayay (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 December 2016 

message: Please remove the blasphemy information . Its absolutely false . 180.178.167.221 (talk) 10:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: - we do not re-write history - the statement is true, and the proof can be seen here - Arjayay (talk) 10:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove blasphemy information . No such had happened . 

message: add junaid jamshed some more video projects with Binoria media
and also update junaid jamshed latest picture Salmanrabbani (talk) 07:51, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2017 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Junaid Jamshed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141213101629/http://jang.com.pk/thenews/jun2009-weekly/nos-21-06-2009/instep/mainissue.htm to http://jang.com.pk/thenews/jun2009-weekly/nos-21-06-2009/instep/mainissue.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Junaid Jamshed was a Nice and Kind man he devoted his life into Islam and Then started doing Religious Islamic Music (Nasheeds) and even joined the tabligi Jamat (religious jamat in Pakistan) 37.211.67.151 (talk) 06:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Please post suggested changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide published reliable sources for any edit request. Also, all these details seem to be already mentioned in the article. GermanJoe (talk) 07:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2017 

message: On december 9th the one year barsi was marked. Editor234856 (talk) 22:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: . There's no request here. What change do you think this article needs? City</span>]]OfSilver 00:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2017 

message: Junaid Jamshed's mother, Nafeesa Akbar Khan, is said to be the granddaughter of the Nawab of Loharu. Does anybody know the name of that Nawab? Danishjaveed (talk) 00:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry 

message: Please change this image of Junaid Jamshed article from File:JUnaijd1.jpg to File:JunaidJamshed-YeWatanShoot.jpg 196.195.16.142 (talk) 18:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2020 

message: mention founder of j. brand in profile Fahadshahfs786 (talk) 21:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:58, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 June 2021 

message: Mr. Junaid Jamshed always wished to be known as preacher of Islam not as musician it was his past but in this article there is no any section about his preacher where he delivered and contributions in this field as compared to music career which is quite long which gives perception as his life mostly consumed in music and it had profound effect on his life 182.190.218.195 (talk) 05:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong perception and information 

message: Naats are different from songs also he disowned his singed songs he owns only naats, also he had no second wife 182.190.218.195 (talk) 05:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  His naat listed as his songs and second wife