Talk:The Daily Star (Bangladesh)

message: Separate article for a newspaper supplement is overkill. Please help improve the article on the main newspaper The Daily Star (Bangladesh) by adding appropriate subsections. Arman Aziz 08:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Star Campus merged. :) Article development on the way. Cheers. Aditya(talk • contribs) 13:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I didn't do it myself as it seemed that Niaz BD was working on Star Campus article. But anyway someone had to do it. Arman Aziz 02:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well... I have a plan to prepare articles on different sections of The Daily Star (Bangladesh) individually (with a template on each of them) and Star Campus is one of my first attempts there. But in order to do this, I think parent article should be in a nice shape which is missing here. That's why I do agree with this merger but in future I will definitely go for expanding this parent article into different sub articles. Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 02:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Niaz, your enthusiasm is much appreciated. But do you really think separate articles on different sections of the same newspaper would be encyclopedic? We have a lot to do including creation of articles on most of the major newspapers in Bangladesh. Let's focus our energy where there is a real need. If you want to achieve something meaningful for this topic, why not we try to improve this article on the main newspaper to GA or even FA status? We can have different section names redirecting to the main article. If you'd like to work on templates, a template for "Newspapers in Bangladesh" could be much more useful. Arman Aziz 11:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can I second that? Well, in fact, as soon as we've gathered together the facts we'd pretty much figure out if there's sufficient material for an encyclopedic article or not. It is not entirely an impossibility that a supplement is taken as notable enough to become an article on its own. But, that's kind of long shot. It is possibly much easier to get the mother article to a GA status. There is much global concern about the credibility of Wikipedia, and that makes the emphasis on quality over quantity a mighty important task. Cheers. Aditya(talk • contribs) 13:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I agreed. :-D Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 20:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick question, would you please tell me why don't you put a merger tag at this article - Cornell_University_Graduate_School? Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 02:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Niaz, I agree to the point you are trying to make. If any article on a notable topic goes beyond 32K+ and still there is more quality content to add, it makes sense to create new articles on the subsections, even when notability of subsections on stand-alone basis may be questionable. The same principle should apply for any university department or sub-sections of a newspaper. Arman Aziz 06:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you bhaia. That is exactly what I tried to mean. I will go for developing articles on Star Campus and other sub-sections of this newspaper in future if we can improve this parent article significantly. Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 03:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Star Campus]]

message: What is a generic description of newspaper administration/management that would fit almost any newspaper in the world doing in the "Administration" section? Aditya(talk • contribs) 02:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The section gives adequate reference. If you can improve, please do. I didn't know almost all newspapers in the world are run by 6-member boards, or that for all newspapers in the world publisher and editor is the same person. Perhaps, we can have a DYK entry on the main page about this! Arman Aziz 04:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Once again, if this looks generic, please try to make this specific by adding details. Or more conveniently you may consider inserting a tag "This section of article looks generic, some editor can help by making this specific". Do you realy think, mocking others' contribution on the talk page will help us achieve anything? Arman Aziz 04:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A vexing conundrum  

message: :Image:Daily star.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Daily star.JPG

message: I do not agree with merging Mahfuz Anam into The Daily Star (Bangladesh). Mahfuz Anam is the current Chairperson for Asia News Network, he is a  media expert for UNESCO and runs an NGO (Freedom Foundation). He is definitely a notable personality on his own right and deserves a stand alone article. I agree the current article is not rich enough, but there is definitely a scope to improve it to a complete article. Arman (Talk) 01:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal ([[Mahfuz Anam]])

message: I've reinserted the short section on criticisms of the paper, specifying that the criticism is with regards to the reporting on the ICT (and not necessarily in general), and adding a further reference. David Bergman, who authored the blog post reference has worked for a few different English language papers in Bangladesh, including the Daily Star itself, and is an acclaimed journalist, so according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_self-published_blogs the reference may be included here. Also, the allegation that the US embassy had to intervene to remove an offending article is significant enough to deserve mention here.
Abbasfirnas887 (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please come up with a reliable reference. A blog post can't be a reliable reference for 3rd parties. --Ragib (talk) 22:59, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism of the paper

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.thedailystar.net/about-us. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  /wiae /tlk 10:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion