Talk:Lacrosse (satellite)

message: I believe that any statement that any Lacrosse constellation member is similar to Magellan are a complete fabrication. 
:Nonsense!47.215.180.7 (talk) 18:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The above is a bunch of crazy nonsense. (You seen to be having trouble with the word "similar".) "Magellan" and "Lacrosse" both use synthetic aperture radar, and thus they are prima facie similar to one another. (This means that it is as plain as the nose on your face.) The fine details of the technology make no difference at all. (Electronics engineers like me know this.) Furthermore, the Cassini space probe to Saturn was similar to these two in that it used synthetic aperture radar to observe the surface of the moon Titan, always shrouded in clouds. The word "similar" does not mean "identical".47.215.180.7 (talk) 17:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Similarities to Magellan

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Any use of the acronym "SAR" needs to be done with great care because SAR also means "search-and-rescue". If you say something about the Lacrosse satellite being used in a SAR mode, then it is quite apparent that such a satellite could also be used for search-and-rescue missions. Be careful because such things in aerospace electronics OFTEN have multiple uses, even those that they were not designed for. This was made clear when the radar system of the Cassini probe was used for several unanticipated purposes.47.215.180.7 (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: "It is able to see through cloud cover and also has some ability to penetrate soil, __though there have been more powerful instruments deployed in space for this specific purpose__"
any sources on that?
:Almost any X-band SAR can penetrate clouds, soil, or buildings (see Capella Space for instance). Real question is it X-band SAR. Nazargulov (talk) 19:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing source 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lacrosse (satellite). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040817035847/http://www.astronautix.com/craft/lacrosse.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/craft/lacrosse.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070120065655/http://www.zen32156.zen.co.uk/lacrosse.htm to http://www.zen32156.zen.co.uk/lacrosse.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070520012043/http://www.zen32156.zen.co.uk/disappearencs.htm to http://www.zen32156.zen.co.uk/disappearencs.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The structure of the article seem to be messed up near "In pop culture" and "traversing Canis Minor".
--Mortense (talk) 17:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messed up