Talk:Visigothic Kingdom

message: The Visigoths spoke Latin during in that age (Visigothic Kingdom of Hispania).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Infinauta (talk • contribs) 02:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not true. The nobility retained the use of the Gothic tongue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.250.135.238 (talk) 04:32, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Visigoth Kingdom lasted for several centuries, and impacted deeply in Spain (even the idea of Spain comes from this period). In spite of this, there are very few words of Germanic (ancient) origin in Spanish. It seems that when they came, they were totally or nearly totally latinized. Xareu bs (talk) 17:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Gothic language??

message: What is the capital of the Visigothic Kingdom from 507 to the 550s/560s (reign of Athanagild) ? Narbonne ? Barcelona ? Mérida ? Seville ? Cordoba ? 88.178.38.7 (talk) 16:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Muslim invasion succeeded because the Visigoths were decentralised: it might not be quite so appropriate to talk of a capital in the modern sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.250.135.238 (talk) 04:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital 

message: Why is judaism mentioned as one of the religions? No source is cited and the article doesn't mention anything about it. Alepik (talk) 16:48, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Judaism certainly existed in Iberia, as the Inquisition would expel Jews as well as Muslims. But there definitely needs to be a source here.--¿3family6 contribs 20:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to point you a little further, the Jewish presence was diasporrhic, and so possibly predates recorded history. See History of the Jews in Spain  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.250.135.238 (talk) 04:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judaism 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.turismo-prerromanico.es/arterural/recopol/recopolFicha.htm
*:Triggered by \bturismo-prerromanico\.es\b on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: The list of kings in the summary block is incomplete. While there were many short-lived kings that may be omitted to simplify the list, several major kings are missing. The list should include at least those kings mentioned in the body of the article, such as Chindaswinth (642-653). Eni2dad (talk) 06:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Kings 

message: See revert of my edit: . See also here: Visigoths#Visigothic kingdom. I do not really care to much about these pages or if they all use the correct spelling (to edit war on it..). There seems there should be one rule (used consistetly between pages). You can duel it out.. :) comp.arch (talk) 10:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Kingdom be in lower case? 

message: I came across this new article while fixing errors, and thought it might be of interest to anyone watching this article. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 13:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Visigothic Kings]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect A list of Visigothic Kings and it has been listed for discussion. Readers of this page are welcome to participate at  until a consensus is reached.  Marcocapelle (talk) 12:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:A list of Visigothic Kings]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Theodoic the Great was a king of Ostrogoths (474-526) but no king of Visigoths. He was only the guardian for his grandson Amalaric, king of Visigoths for 511 to 531, during his minority. Pharnawas (talk) 22:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error for Theodoric the Great. 

message: This page appears to unduly conflate two fairly distinct chapters of Visigothic history, that of the Visigothic Kingdom of Tolouse, or Visigothic Aquitaine, and the Visigothic Kingdom of Toledo, better known as Visigothic Spain. Given that the Kingdom of Tolouse essentially crumbled in 508 (see , , etc.), with its royal line ending and the Ostrogothic king Theodoric the Great taking the reigns in Spain, it is a bit dubious to treat it all as a continuum. I propose covering these two distinct chapters on separate pages. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *Looking at related articles it might actually make more sense to MERGE this one and Visigoths. I notice that there is an almost total overlap. The Visigoths did not really exist before they came to be ruled under a king. --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 08:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *:I agree.  I kept forgetting as I read that it wasn't the general Visigoth article. 2606:6000:DFC0:1B:1C2F:5361:D4BB:BA63 (talk) 18:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:CONSPLIT]] suggestion 

message: I learned about the "Visigodos" by traveling around Spain and reading history and art history books, often supplied by instructors, as I went.  The most--I'm tempted to say 'only'--physically visible Visigothic heritage is in buildings, not many.  No mention yet of this in the part on culture?  These buildings, called crude by some I travelled with, were architecturally simple, direct, effective, and even touching to me.  I'm no Catholic but these religious remnants of the end of the Roman Empire are such a testament to an ancient people's will to build simply but solidly, and to worship.  So much so that I've never really stopped going back to these monuments of "los Visigodos."  The Visigoths Became Spain, so much of their leavings are not to be noticed, not distinct but part of the warp and woof of the peninsula.  Anyone feel like pitching in to cover this touching and most long-lasting of Visigothic heritages?  Alan from Tucson sorry I didn't sign in. 2606:6000:DFC0:1B:1C2F:5361:D4BB:BA63 (talk) 18:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Distinctive Visigothic Architecture:  No Mention? 

message: “the Visigothic population, who had fled from the Muslims and taken refuge in Asturias, where they joined Pelagius.”
is inaccurate because there was not a widespread migration under Muslim hegemony.  Tmarac (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  After 711  

message: The statement "by the Visigothic population, who had fled from the Muslims and taken refuge in Asturias, where they joined Pelagius." is misleading because the whole population certainly did not flee. See historians Roger Collins and Jamie Wood. Tmarac (talk) 13:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  inaccurate statements