Talk:Gum arabic

message: "Gum arabic is taken from the sap of the acacia tree."
Indeed. Why? What's it for? What does it do? Properties, History... research!!!!
: Aww, don't bite the newbies! It is a wiki, anyway, afterall :) Dysprosia 03:51, 5 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Can anyone provide a date as to when Snapple changed their labels?  Or even verify that they ever used the old name at all?
The Storm Surfer 09:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snapple 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 03:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: I read in a book that it is commercially harvested from wild trees as the crop cannot be influenced by pruning, fertiliser or water (thus eliminating usefulness in plantation fields). Is this true ?, sounds odd.
Add a section about it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.182.163.77 (talk) 11:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial plantations

message: The article on Mastix is awful, but do not merge it with gum arabic!!! They might occasionally get confused, but two are not the same! Mastix is the resin from a tree called Pistacia lentiscus, and gum arabic is made from the resin of two species of acacia tree. They have different properties, and are used for distinct purposes in the culinary and artistic fields.134.100.86.133 (talk) 13:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " Gum arabic " system made of acacia tree ! ,
And " Mastic " is made out of Pistacia lentiscus tree ! . Unfortunately many people in the world do not know this spice is known to only a few in the Middle East , And a secret except for people as a great healer. I ask not to be confused with Gum arabic is something else entirely! . " Mastic is made of wood and Pistacia lentiscus ". And Gum arabic is produced from a Acacia tree resin. This spice also does not appear in any dictionary in the world and the first time he appears in the encyclopedia That he always appears in the encyclopedia as a " resin of Pistacia lentiscus " . burekas (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Mastic and gum arabic are indeed two very different substances, from different plants, with different properties and uses. Gum arabic is soluble in water, and once formed the basis for the glue on postage stamps and envelope flaps. It is also used in vernice bianca, which would not work at all if someone tried to substitute mastic for the gum arabic. Mastic finds one of its uses in drying-oil type varnishes incorporating, for example, linseed oil. Mastic is not soluble in water; in fact, a small piece of it makes a long-lasting chewing gum. With this in mind, I will boldly remove the merge tag on the mastic page, as not having a snowball's chance of passing. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 16:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mastic (resin)]] it is not [[Gum arabic]] !!! 

message: New entry "Mastic (resin)" has a suggestion to add the value into the value "Gum arabic".
I want to say it's really not the same! , " Gum arabic " system made of acacia tree ! ,
And " Mastic " is made out of Pistacia lentiscus tree ! burekas (talk) 17:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mastic (resin)]] it is not [[Gum arabic]] 

message: i ask, becouse moroccan jews put it in a " Almond nougat " that called : " jaban baluz ", and they eat this in the end of passover. burekas (talk) 09:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so-- as far as I know, Gum Arabic is added for its effect on texture, not flavour. Beastiepaws (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Gum arabic]] it is also a spice  ?  ............... 

message: # ^ See page 4 of the World Bank Policy Note, Export Marketing of gum arabic from Sudan, March 2007 - http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRMDTF/Resources/Gum_Arabic_Policy_Note.pdf
It's page 5 not 4....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.137.56.11 (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong page 

message: The article only cryptically alludes to toxicity. Does anyone have more information? Zip-x (talk) 15:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxicity? 

message: This article is poorly cited but may contain some information relevant to a larger subject (that is, gum arabic itself) if reliable sources can be found. §everal⇒|Times 02:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost nothing worth moving, but nevertheless,  Klbrain (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Pharmacognosy of Acacia (Gum)]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Gum arabic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130528163750/http://afp.google.com:80/article/ALeqM5jfgNmGYOlaBdb6OKP3JEyrw4AHTA to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jfgNmGYOlaBdb6OKP3JEyrw4AHTA
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Placing an adjective after a noun is perfectly normal in many languages, e.g. in Polish: "guma arabska". But in English "gum arabic" sounds terrible. How about "arabic gum"? 85.193.232.158 (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird grammar. 

message: Having read the linked source (a paper about Gum Arabic in Morocco), it contains no mention of either Gum Arabic or the "taifa plant" being used to make any kind of fuel. With some limited googling, I couldn't find any mention of this either... not least because, as far as the internet knows, there is no plant called "taifa". Having not been able to find any sources to correlate the information in the section Gum arabic#Fuel charcoal, I believe the whole section should be removed.
This strange information seems to have slipped in a while back in a single edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gum_arabic&diff=prev&oldid=912166034) and gone unnoticed since then.
The source is still useful for the preceding section on pyrotechnics though. I have therefore added it as a citation in the pyrotechnics section and removed the "citation needed" tag.DigitalHamster (talk) 18:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage as fuel charcoal is plain wrong... proposed removal