lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Avianca

message: To make this template more effective, I have made the following changes:
* Converted style of template so it can be edited from the template on any page on which it is located
* 'Associated airlines' (which was linked to subsidiary), has been renamed to 'Subsidiaries' and only those airlines which fulfill the definition of a subsidiary are listed. The term 'associated' implies that Avianca has a shareholding in the companies which were listed (Ocean Air, VIP and Capital Airlines), and it is not a shareholder, they all share common ownership.
* 'Defuncted airlines' has been changed to simply 'History'; 'defuncted airlines' is not proper English. WayraPeru has been removed, as it was not an entity which preceded Avianca, nor was it a subsidiary
* 'Related companies' has been reduced to a single link and renamed to 'Parent company'; the other 2 wikilinks in this section all redirected to the link which remains anyway.
* The website URL has been removed. Navbox templates are meant for easy navigation of directly related articles on WP, not as a promotional tool for an entity, and most certainly not for external links.
* Category has been changed to :Category:Airline navigational boxes from :Category:Aviation navigational boxes --Россавиа Диалог 21:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes made to the template 

message: The Avianca portal was recently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to deleted portal removed
Talk:Kadalekai Parishe

message: Can somebody mention the date of this fair according to Hindu Panchanga ? Lokesh 2000 (talk) 10:27, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of the fair 
Talk:Cris Bonacci

message: This is directed to the person who slapped the trivia tag on the front page; please explain. Simply automatically tagging an article because one is unfamiliar with the subject matter does very little else but ultimately kill WikiPedia. Please explain. Pretty please with cherry on top. --Tirolion 08:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If someone's watching this page, is it possible to get a confirmation on Cris' birthyear? 1966 is far too recently if she was playing in Melbourne pubs in the late 70s. --BrianFG (talk) 16:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate?
Talk:Trandolapril

message: Is it brain-penetrating? Seems to be: . If so, should it be added in the article? CopperKettle 18:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brain-penetrating? 
Talk:SCADTA

message: SCADTA was the first commercial airline of the American continent and the second in the world  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.182.56.52 (talk) 16:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: (First comment)

message: About that: The introduction also claims SCADTA was the world's second airline, and the first airline in the Americas. That doesn’t square with our :Category:Airlines established in 1919, which lists nearly a dozen other companies founded that year, most of them before December. The category also includes Chalk’s Flying Service, which was offering flights from Miami to the Bahamas (ie. international, and in the Americas) ten months prior to this. Thoughts? Moonraker12 (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like they mean it's the second oldest continuously running airline, or in other words it is the oldest airline after KLM Royal Dutch Airlines still running now (as Avianca after merging with SACO) Edy4gaona (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: This is unclear. The company was the 'Colombian-German Air Transport Company'; so, were they offering a transatlantic service from Germany and Columbia? In 1919? Or does it mean they were a German company operating in Columbia, so felt they had to have the word German in the title? Anyone know? Moonraker12 (talk) 18:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter, and its existence was terminated due to that very German involvement, which covered financing, equipment and flight crews. - NiD.29 (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?
Talk:Fira Basuki

message: WP:RS needed for this article SatuSuro 14:48, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please help
Talk:Gallipoli (2005 film)

message: "little to do with the story"...sorry, but I fail to see how a regiment that was virtually wiped out at the Nek (as depicted in the other Gallipoli film) has little to do with the story.KhProd1 (talk) 06:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  8 ALHR 

message: Gallipoli film at SnagFilms (complete and free)
This cannot be seen in all countries. And there's a button that says: "Buy now". This link should be better explained. --Maduixa (talk) 15:16, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The movie
Talk:Bravo Air Congo

message: There is a problem with this article as Bravo Air Congo apears on the most recent copy of the list of airlines banned from EU airspace.  This article sites Paris as a destination.
Braditude 18:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What prevents you from doing the fix? --moyogo 23:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem 

message: Why is the article in the past tense?  At least their website indicates that they're still flying. Jpatokal (talk) 04:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, has Bravo Air Congo turned into Bravo Airlines?  (At least the website seems to redirect.)  If so, shouldn't the two articles be merged? Jpatokal (talk) 04:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Here's a photo of their one plane at rest in Arizona plane graveyard.  I flew on that plane to Bukavu in August 2007.  Dunxd (talk) 11:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense?
Talk:Compagnie Africaine d'Aviation

message: Basankusu can be searched for on the airline's website, but there aren't any planes going there. This was certainly the situation in September 2012 and I believe remains true today. Francis Hannaway (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basankusu as a destination 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. eviolite (talk) 04:47, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Hewa Bora Airways

message: Contradiction: How can Brussels be a Focus city of Hewa Bora Airways if they are banned in Europe? Jushi (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brussels as focus-city? 

message: http://www.hba.cd/contenu/sites/HewaBoraAirWays/contenu_site/cms/media/file/Time_Table_158.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 08:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Timetable
Talk:AAR Corp

message: Sorry, but that "Advertisement" label on the article page appears to be a heavy hammer to fix something that appears to read like a company brochure. Yeah, it needs work and some links, etc. Hopefully, I'll be back to help out.--TGC55 (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy Hammer label?
Talk:Sputnik (disambiguation)

message: Good grief, folks! Can I have five minutes to develop a page and update the related pages to reflect that there are three Sputniks to disambiguate, rather than two? Speedy deletion is an understatement! DanielM 19:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I observe that there was an edit war a while ago over whether to include Sigue Sigue Sputnik: , , , and .  
That in mind: Many people, including myself, remember “Sigue Sigue Sputnik” as “Sputnik” (since that’s the most memorable word in the band’s title), so we should include it here to help people find the article. Samboy (talk) 19:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In particular, the band called themselves “Sputnik” in some of their singles: See this album cover for example. Samboy (talk) 20:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: And reliable sources, when describing Sigue Sigue Sputnik, call them Sputnik (the linked article has wording like “Sputnik had a musical identity”, without “Sigue Sigue” anywhere in that paragraph). Samboy (talk) 00:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sigue Sigue Sputnik]]
Talk:Trans Service Airlift

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide  01:59, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Mike Smith (Dave Clark Five)

message: I’d take that with a grain of salt. It’s entirely possible, and would have been the wise thing, for him to have transferred assets legally before his death. Nicmart (talk) 05:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estate
Talk:WTCM-FM

message: The one source (2 citations) stated at the end of the article back up almost none of the narrative of this article, beyond the frequency and format of the stations.  The article also is moderately outside of the rules requiring articles having a Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view.   Specifically this sentence - "Because of two generations of Biederman management and attention, and a faithful northern Michigan audience, WTCM-AM/FM are the clearly dominant stations in their given formats in the market".   While I would not assert that the statement is not true, it is clearly not neutral point of view.
I think it is safe to assume that this is "original research" compiled by someone associated with the stations, and needs serious trimming or addition of published sources to meet the requirements for  Wikipedia:Attribution... 
StreamingRadioGuide 19:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your NPOV observations, and will work on that. As for the sources, they back up all the info included in the infoboxes and are a staple of the structure for all Michigan radio articles. JPG-GR 20:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Koman languages

message: Here indeed the lable controversial makes sense, as there are some linguists, and they are named in the article, who question the inclusion of the Koman languages into Nilosaharan. Landroving Linguist (talk) 13:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  controversial 
Talk:List of brown algal genera

message: This list should state clearly on top that it was created through NCBI.  The reason for this, is that NCBI is not necessarily the best choice for algae taxonomy, but it's a starting place.  For example, see the orders and species listed at AlgaeBase.org to see differences.  Still, very useful to post these lists. KP Botany 19:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Saga dialect

message: * 下二段活用をすることがある。
例：「笑われる」→「笑わるう」または「笑わるっ」、「寝ろ」→「寝れ」
I get how laugh conjugates here.  But the neru conjugation is a mystery.  Anyone know how to explain this rule?Claytonian 13:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: help

message: In addition, Saga-ben also has the unique pronunciations of "za, zu, ze, da, ga," and "na" rendered as "jya, jyu, jye, jya, gya," and "nya", respectively. Do jya, jyu, and jye indicate simply hompohones of the Standard Japanese pronunciations of じゃ、 じゅ、 and じぇ, or is there actually a y sound pronounced (i.e., [dZja], [dZju], [dZje]?)  That is, is the use of jya, jyu, and jye here simply the fairly common informal romanization of those, or does it indicate a different pronunciation?  Based on the pronunciations given for the s-row, I'm guessing there's no actual /j/ sound.
Also, am I correct in understanding that this dialect has no distinction between しゃ and さ, しゅ and す, and しょ and そ? Nik42 23:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification on Pronunciation
Talk:Air Rarotonga

message: In a number of edits ip editor 81.156.239.216 has been continually adding that Air Raro are planning on flying to Auckalnd with a new on order A319.  There appears to be no refereancable support for their succession of changes. Andrewgprout (talk) 22:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive editing by 81.156.239.216
Talk:Bilen language

message: Not sure what justification the article had for being moved from "Bilen", where it was obviously started. The formerly common English name was "Bogo" and the people are now known as the Bilen. Kindly supply evidence that "Blin" &c. is more common before moving it back and, if you do move it to Blin, change the text to match the namespace. — LlywelynII 07:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Namespace

message: This article says ብሊና, but I also see ብሊን is some places.
What is correct? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it ብሊና or ብሊን?
Talk:Saw Kill

message: Really, this should be two separate articles: Saw Kill (Esopus Creek), for the western one and Saw Kill (Hudson River) for the one in Red Hook and [[Milan, New York|Milan]. Anyone have any different ideas? Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's grown enough that it is probably worthwhile.  Ahwiv (talk) 21:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright. I'll do it probably within a couple of weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WBTI

message: As of this date, web site URL points to an empty web site - no known replacement.StreamingRadioGuide 15:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Allostock

message: #Stub needs to be massively expanded.
#Photos need to be added.
#Infobox needs to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 19:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:Maay Maay

message: Baro maay maay 102.222.235.196 (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maay maay 

message: @Cookiemonster1618 Why are you placing Bantu before Rahanwayne when it’s not a Bantu language? It’s a Somali dialect clearly? The same way Tunni dialect belongs to Tunni? Coastalmerch (talk) 22:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not placed anything. Maay is a dialect of the Somali language and is spoken by the Somali Bantu community which numbers 1 million people. It doesnt matter what order you place it in, Maay is still spoken by the Gosha or Somali Bantu community. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 23:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It does matter what order it is in since the Somali language was adopted by the Bantu people. They are a minority compared to wider Rahanweyn clan Coastalmerch (talk) 23:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

text: How am i vandalising the article when you just said you don’t mind what order it’s in placed in? The dialect is not a Bantu tongue and belongs to Rahanweyn? Can you stop reverting the edits? Coastalmerch (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you continue to remove the Wikipedia page to Gosha or switch it I will report you to an administrator. You are clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Who are the original speakers of Maay???? Whose dialect was it to begin with???? Gosha???? You’re clearly attaching this dialect to the wrong demographic. Maay is not their original tongue. You need to stop the bantufication Coastalmerch (talk) 11:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maay belongs to Digil & Mirifle
Talk:Usucaption

message: After reading this, I still don't know what Usucaption is...  could somebody who does make this article a bit clearer?  And by the way, isn't this a stub? FerralMoonrender 19:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: This page should be merged with usucapio.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Whoiswinstonsmith (talk • contribs) 
:I've taken the liberty of slightly reformatting your request - hope you don't mind - and do remember to sign your posts to talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). On topic, I created the usucapio page because this page hinted that there might be modern systems other than Roman law that employed a process by this name. I have no idea personally whether that's the case. If it is,m then this page should serve as a summary of each of them, possibly also combining any shared features. Accordingly, if there are others, this shouldn't be merged. If there are, it should. Grandiose (talk)
::Agreed about the merger point. I do not know of modern usucapion either, but even if there are contemporary usucapion processes, the Roman one is best known. This article should however be kept separate whilst there's no information about it. Thank you for the reformatting: It all helps me to learn wikipedia editing, likewise about signatures. Whoiswinstonsmith (talk) 13:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As of today, both articles are mostly discussing roman usucapio. But as this procedures is still in use, at least in some european countries (like France and Switzerland), I think that the article on usucaption is really usefull, even if it clearly need to be completed on contemporary uses.--Taillevent (talk) 09:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Cotyledon

message: This article starts, "A cotyledon is a significant part of the embryo within the seed of a plant."  That sentence doesn't actually tell the reader what a cotyledon actually is.  Kaiserkarl13 (talk) 23:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Say what it is 

message: the image for comparing monocotyledon and dicotyledon.
please change the image for the monocotyledon, it can be very misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohmann (talk • contribs) 04:07, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the image 

message: I have a found a reliable source or citation.
Citation: Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "cotyledon". Encyclopedia Britannica, Invalid Date, https://www.britannica.com/science/cotyledon-plant-anatomy. Accessed 19 October 2021. Contributer1234 (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable Citation 

message: what are cotyledons 2409:4081:1D8A:83BA:0:0:C808:4313 (talk) 02:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More abote plants
Talk:Cohoes Falls

message: Another photo for the article is at here with licensing . Suntag (talk) 01:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Much of the article seems to be overtaken by information regarding Brookfield's School Street hydoelectric plant. It reads much like advertising and promotional material for that company and does not talk much about GIPA's fight for the licence so they can put a bigger better plant. I am biased as I support GIPA's plan and think it is much better for the Capital District to have a locally controlled municipal authority own our resources than to have a Canadian company own them. So I'd rather not do the editing myself and have the problem of being too biased in the other direction. But if there isnt anyone else out there interested I guess I will. I just thought I'd put it out there that this article is waaaaaaaay too interested in a power plant and the POV that Brookfield is such a good company.Camelbinky (talk) 21:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GIPA versus Brookfield
Talk:Halt and Catch Fire (computing)

message: I'm not really sure why the Zilog Z80 is mentioned here at all. As on the Intel 8080, what would be otherwise be a MOV M,M instruction is encoded as a HALT; the CPU stops until it gets interrupted. If, however, the program has disabled interrupts, obviously the CPU is going to stay halted -- unless it is sent a non-maskable interrupt, which both the 8080 and the Z80 provide. So in neither case does DI followed by HALT cause anything unusual; certainly not catching fire. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Z80 halt
Talk:Ami James

message: Israeli Special Forces
There needs to be a source that can verify this claim. On the TLC website, I think, it says that he was in miami since the age of 12. How could he have been in even the Israeli military if he has been in America since the age of 12?
Many people go back to Israel and volunteer for the military. He even tattooed another person on the show who did the same thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.75.63 (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dahlgren system

message: ¿This is what publication of the Dahlgren system? I does not have any references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RoRo en wiki (talk • contribs) 11:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

message: This needs to be carefully checked against original sources. I have made numerous corrections but have not checked every entry. It looks as if a secondary source may have been used --Michael Goodyear (talk) 03:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy
Talk:1697 to 1725 English cricket seasons

message: I've reduced the quality rating back to start-class because I'm very uncomfortable with this article. It was written six years ago and since then site standards have improved especially to comply with WP:V and related policies. The article is in effect a spinoff from History of cricket to 1725 and it should really present a focus on each individual season at a time when very little source data was recorded. Work is needed to make better use of it and this may mean splitting the content by creating additional articles. ----Jack | talk page 10:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article status
Talk:1726 English cricket season

message: Have tagged this "in use" as I want to complete the merger of its content into the history and I'm using it for practice as I need to make sure I understand the closure requirements of WP:MERGE. The content here is brief and easily manageable so it is a good one to start with, especially as it's the first year in the series. The single wicket piece is significant, being the earliest known match, and the bits about the court case and the reading of the Riot Act are interesting. No Great Shaker (talk) 08:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  in use
Talk:Aston-by-Sutton

message: #Stub needs to be massively expanded.(See Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements for guidance.)
#Photos need to be added.
#Infobox needs to be added. (see Template:Infobox UK place/doc‎ for guidance.)
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: Now that Vale Royal no longer exists, should we think about a new name for this page? — Old Wittonian (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As Aston by Budworth, Aston by Wrenbury and Aston juxta Mondrum all seem to be in Cheshire East, maybe Aston, Cheshire West and Chester would do? //Essin (talk) 00:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name