Talk:Pg. 99

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 20:37, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: I have added to this page. Please amend it because it is dire. --Borbetomagus 14:27, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition 

message: How does a screamo band have 14 members? Someone?
                   Maybe you should listen to them and find out, they are chaotic.
From their Myspace:
"We were just a group of friends who all wanted to play music and try to make our lives more incredible. We formed as a 6 piece in the Winter of 1998 and later became an 8 piece."
I've heard from people in other bands who toured with pg. 99 that they had many more than 8 members at times. So 14 members doesn't seem too unreasonable if you give them a listen. Bungoman (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Members

message: Some members of Pg. 99 supposedly went on to form Darkest Hour, but I'm not sure which ones. I also mentioned this on the Darkest Hour discussion page.--Relyt22 21:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darkest Hour 

message: I have more information on most of their albums such as tracklists/tracktimes and pressing info. Would it be appropriate to expand their release section to include such information? I don't have online sources for the info, so that's one reason to be hesitant. Also I'm not sure pg. 99's releases meet the notability guidelines. There's a pretty big pg. 99 following still, but it's kind of a niche within a niche. I do know that to people into pg. 99 that kind of information would be relevant. But, I've never seen pressing info on any other artists page and the guidelines don't mention it so kinda seems like it's a no no. Anyone have thoughts on this? Given the sheer number of releases pg. 99 had in such a short time I personally think expanding the information a little would be a good idea. Bungoman (talk) 08:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Album Info? 

message: Per WP:NALBUM, there is no good reason for separate articles   Chzz  ►  00:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Would a discography page better suit, or should the content be merged into this page's discography? Chubbles (talk) 01:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Pg. 99. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.reptilianrecords.com/reptilian/pg99.html
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5ybSuXW3q?url=http://www.roboticempire.com/discography.html to http://www.roboticempire.com/discography.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125033928/http://www.reptilianrecords.com/reptilian/2007/uncategorized/page-99/ to http://www.reptilianrecords.com/reptilian/2007/uncategorized/page-99/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified