Talk:Thermcon

message: My edits were just an attempt to remove some weasel words in the interest of NPOV. 
In addition, I removed the second half of the last paragraph:
Bari and Cherney, Californian Earth First! activists who were not involved with or directly targeted by THERMCON, later speculated that the operation was an attempt to link Earth First! to the use of explosives prior to the 1990 car bomb explosion which severely injured Bari on the eve of the “Redwood Summer" campaign of civil disobedience.
I simply do not understand it. Who injured this Bari person? How is that incident related to this one?
Paul, in Saudi 04:30, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Bari (first name Judy or Judi?) was the victim of a car bombing in 1990 while she was organizing anti-logging protests in California.  She wasn't related to this (THERMCON) at all which was a late 1980s operation in Arizona.  If somebody can find a direct quote from Bari it might be relevant to this article (check her book - Timber Wars I think it is called, I don't have a copy.)  But it should be a direct quote, not just an unsourced "Bari and Cherney...speculated" entry.  70.108.47.157 12:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. Neither Bari nor Cherney were involved in either EMETIC or THERMCON. If she mentioned it in her book or speeches, it was only to boost her own image. I met Darrel Cherney at the 1988 Round River Rendezvous (RRR) near Republic, WA. I would describe him as a small-time minstrel who attached himself to celebrities-of-the-hour. I never met Bari. I believe that all this confusion was generated in an effort to focus attention on Bari's injuries. --Victor Stilson 21:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: THERMCON and Evan Mecham Eco-Terrorist International Conspiracy are two different aspects of the same series of events in Arizona in the late 80s, and they are both stub articles that don't reference the other name.  How about merging the two into one article?  70.108.47.157 12:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agree that both articles appear to be describing different aspects of the same events, a merge may not produce the result that you desire.  The problem is Wikipedia:Verifiability requires that information be supported by reliable sources.  The Evan Mecham Eco-Terrorist International Conspiracy lists its sources, and thus does not have any problems meeting the requirements of this core content policy (the perceived pro-FBI slant is a result of adhering to these sources).  The THERMCON however appears to be built primarily from personal knowledge, and the closest thing to a reference are the three external links where two of the links are self-published sources and the third link is dead.  Before a merge is performed appropriate sources should be found for the THERMCON article or else the merged article will soon look very much like the current EMETIC article as all the unreferenced material is removed to comply with Wikipedia policy. Jester 01:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can help with the rewrite and sources but I'll have to dig the sources up at a visit to the library sometime soon.  The book Coyotes and Town Dogs by Susan Zakin and the SPIN magazine article below are good neutral sources, and the Zakin book covered the entire incident in detail.  I don't have either one handy.  I agree that the self-published material on the web from political activist websites is not a reliable source.  It's highly POV and sometimes hysterical and conspiratorial in its analysis.  In particular, Judi Bari thought the incident was a practice run to discredit her early 1990s work in California.  There are a lot of articles floating around on the web from extreme-left sources like Indymedia taking the same line.  Unfortunately that is what people searching the web on this are going to find right now.  On the other side, material from wise use movement sources are just as POV and just as bad.  We need a good, comprehensive, neutral article.  What do you think about the name for the article?  Evan Mecham Eco-Terrorist International Conspiracy, THERMCON, or something else?  Separate articles or merge? 70.108.139.153 15:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that readers would be better served by a single article that covers as many different aspects of the topic as possible, so a merge of the articles makes sense.  Beyond this, I am unsure which is the better name for the article.  I have seen nothing to indicate that either name is better known by the general public, so the most common name determiniation does not seem overly viable. Ultimately I do not think he article name is as important as having a well writen article lead to address potential confusion over the inevitable redirect. Jester 12:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

text:  I would like to collaborate in the discussion and merging of these two articles. My name is Ronald Frazier, I wrote the previous comment signed "Victor Stilson". This alias derives from a nom-de-guerre that I adopted at the 1988 Round River Rendezvous during the infamous Ed Abbey speech, when I announced a Diesel Workshop the following day. When asked my name, I gave the common name for a monkey-wrench, "Stilson". The other part of the alias derives from my stint as a Confidential Informant for the FBI, when they asked me for a codename when calling the office in Phoenix, one agent suggested "Torch". (the investigation was then focused on the acetylene torch damage of the Flagstaff Ski area) This sounded so "corny" that I immediately adopted the brandname of my favorite metal sculpture torch: a "Victor" 110. While media sources are readily available (with, perhaps the exception of the afore-mentioned "SPIN" article) they are clearly derivative works and do not penetrate to the core of the matter. As an individual directly involved with the investigation into the activities of EMETIC, Earth First! and Radical Anti-Nuke elements, I propose to work directly with the editors of both articles in order to produce a HQ/NPOV article. If this is acceptable, please post some means of contact here. (At that time, I will answer questions and clarify any distortions/mis-perceptions to the best of my ability. I do not pretend to be able to write an unbiased report, myself: I was far too involved personally and professionally to gain a purely objective POV and I hope that this Wiki will provide me with a perspective/reference for myself.) -Victor Stilson 17:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: If somebody can locate the article in an old issue of Spin (magazine), the article "Raising Arizona" from a 1989 issue (July or August?) of SPIN is a very good - and fairly neutral - article that would make a good reference.  The article is not online, or at least I can't find it.  70.108.47.157 12:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: possible references