Talk:List of planetary nebulae

message: Is there someone with knowledge on how to do tables that can tackle this one and format it better?--Kalsermar 19:45, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like someone has already done this, and added in sortable columns - great! However, the sort function has a feature whereby column headers can no longer link to Wikipedia articles. Shame. -- Zexpe 19:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: An image used in this article, File:NGC 2359.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:NGC 2359.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Does the Southern Owl Nebula warrant an article, or is it just a copykat of the Owl Nebula?
http://astronomynow.com/2015/08/05/the-ghost-of-a-dying-star/
Hcobb (talk) 16:42, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not worth an article, unless you know something about it that I don't.  You could put it in the list though, maybe even create a redirect so people will find it. Planetary nebulae are very photogenic though.  Lithopsian (talk) 18:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Owl Nebula 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The big question: 'How many catalogues of Planetary Nebulae are there really?' (or rather: 'How many astronomical catalogues are there since the very first ones (such as Messier's) were compiled') (especially those of deep-sky objects). But first of all I want to see something online which shows an alphabetic arrangement of (what I call) "sub-catalogues" of planetary nebulae, other than the general Perek-Kohoutek Catalogue. I created an alphabetic list of catalogues at the bottom of the page -List of Planetary Nebulae-, but, of course, this is not the right place (or...???).
Anyway, the source which ignited my own experimental ABC is:
https://www.hs.uni-hamburg.de/DE/Ins/Per/Kohoutek/kohoutek/WEBcgpn2/table7-DEF/index.html
Danny Caes, Ghent-Belgium (explorer of astronomical catalogues and nicknames of deep-sky objects).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1812:151F:5500:6DB0:E10C:2CAE:9FF2 (talk) 07:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly List of astronomical catalogues.  Not specific to planetary nebulae or even nebulae, but a list of catalogues and their acronyms.  Then maybe a paragraph (of words in sentences!) about it either here or at the planetary nebula page?  Those catalogues that are in common use can be mentioned specifically, especially if their acronyms show up in this list.  The alternative names column could be populated with the most common catalogue entries.  Lithopsian (talk) 13:39, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalogues and Designation Codes of Planetary Nebulae 

message: The nebula that is missing is NGC 281
Julianstout (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because NGC 281 is an Emission nebula, not a Planetary nebula. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.193.130.191 (talk) 12:06, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some nebula are missing from this list