Talk:Spin (novel)

message: I removed the following chunk of unsourced commentary from the article:
"Spin" is an ambitious novel, and both its literary and science fiction aims and allusions are lofty ones.  As in Groundhog Day, the plot device is a metaphor for the human experience.  What do you do once you grasp your mortality and your insignificant place in the universe?  (For Tyler, Jason, and Diane the epiphany comes at the cusp of adolescence, as the sky which had heretofore been a source of wonder becomes a symbol of dread). Each of the protagonists is an archetype for a typical response: materialism, religious zeal, searching for knowledge, or an existentialism bordering on nihilism and despair.  On the science fiction side, there are thoughtful allusions to, among other things: Greg Egan's Quarantine (the idea of extraterrestrials "sealing off" Earth with a complex relativistic membrane, and the social impact of the stars "going out"); Philip José Farmer's Riverworld series (the "Hypotheticals" who created the Spin echo Farmer's "Ethicals"); Robert A. Heinlein (there is an enigmatic stranger from Mars); and The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (the final scene takes place on a ship sailing to an unknown destination).  Tyler's French surname emphasize his similarities and differences with Camus's Meersault, and as in the Stranger, Tyler's reaction to his mother's death is revealing.   And every science fiction novel about the end of the world must of course grapple with the issue of the day.  In this case, that is the degradation of the environment, but the theme is explored subtly and without preaching.
No sources, wildly one-sided, POV, likely Original Research. -- Antepenultimate 23:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:Spin(1stEd).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Spin(1stEd).jpg

message: The final explanation of the spin is that it was created by similar self-replicating machines that the humans have sent out themselves, but far more advanced and with a network that spans most of the galaxy. It is discovered that the corruption of machines that the humans sent out is caused by this entity consuming it, or more precisely, making the human machines part of itself.
Is there any chance someone could re-write this so it makes sense in English?--61.30.11.130 08:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation paragraph: 

message: This article refers to Von Neumann universal constructor, which is a particular case of von neumann self-replicating machines. shouldn't it be refering to Self-replicating spacecraft ?
Zeugma fr (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Von Neumann Machines / Von Neumann Probes 

message: Unlike the novel, this article sucks massive donkey balls.--Cosmiclingo (talk) 04:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Betterfication  

message: I am not agree to cut the plot. I rode this book long time ago and I was pleased to find such a complete plot. Please keep it
User:李中法  —Preceding undated comment added 13:31, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot too long ? 

message: (This has also been posted over at Talk:Robert Charles Wilson#Edit request - Spin miniseries)
Hi! Not entirely sure if I have a COI here or not, so I'm going to err on the side of caution and use an edit request rather than add the following info directly into the article. Anyways. Spin (novel) has been optioned by Universal Cable Productions as a miniseries. Rob Morrow (Bits and Pieces Picture Company) and Leslie Urdang (Olympus Pictures) are producers. http://io9.com/robert-charles-wilsons-spin-could-be-your-next-favorite-1588295823 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/robert-charles-wilsons-sci-fi-710400 (Or they're executive producers according to http://www.thewrap.com/robert-charles-wilson-novel-spin-optioned-for-tv-with/) Jim Uhls is set to write the episodes, and SyFy will be airing the six-hour miniseries. http://variety.com/2015/tv/news/syfy-spin-miniseries-jim-uhls-robert-charles-wilson-book-1201406079/ http://deadline.com/2015/01/spin-miniseries-syfy-1201350869/ Wilson's own announcement is here.
I could swear I remember Wilson saying he's attached to the production as either a producer or an executive producer when he announced UCP's option at a gathering we both attended, but I'm having trouble finding confirmation. I'm going to go through my camera footage of the event and see if his announcement is one of the things I recorded. I'll upload the footage and update this request if it does exist. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 08:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see my answer to this request here. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request - Spin miniseries 

message: I made some copyedits to the plot and removed some tangential information -- the plot was starting to read as more exhaustive than is necessary. The Setting section, meanwhile, I axed: it duplicated content from the Plot section with even more rambling trivia than that other section. --EEMIV (talk) 18:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trims 

message: Substituted at 06:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: ok or not? want me to carry on?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:9800:B900:BC89:BCD6:A86B:F7B8:7E2D (talk) 06:11, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Edited para 1 - 5  plot summary