lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Linguistics

message: The sub-category list is quite irrational and irrelvant.
There are lots of articles here that need to be put into sensible subcategories. --
Beland 02:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We're trying to start a project on theoretical linguistics. Anyone interested can stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject Theoretical Linguistics to see the proposed project and, hopefully, sign up. -- Dalbury(Talk) 01:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed WikiProject Theoretical Linguistics
Talk:Southeastern Maritime Industrial Region

message: The most common name for this region, by a factor of about 100, appears to be 부울경 (Bu-ul-gyeong, from the first syllables of Busan, Ulsan, and Gyeongnam).  Sometimes used in combination with the other name, as "부울경 동남경제권."  -- Visviva 14:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:TOGO'S

message: If anyone knows the proper pronunciation of Togos ("To gos" or "Toe Goes"), please add.  It's been a mystery to my friends and I for quite some time.  Gantry 14:28, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: well, here in its traditional home, we pronounce it "toe goes". Gentgeen 10:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I ate there regularly in 1983 and 1984 in Sunnyvale, California. My co-workers and I pronounced it "toe goes". 2600:100C:B02A:27A7:1479:13B4:2E50:E98C (talk) 15:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Previous versions of the page had more details on the history of how the restaurant started, as well as the origins of the name. Much of both are now missing. Why? (I also notice the official ToGo's web site lacks those details as well. A corporate conspiracy?) If it's a matter of verifiablity, there's got to be somewhere newspaper articles and such with that information. 
For the record, I do seem to recall at the original San Jose Togo's there being an informative sign citing the name as coming from Tom and Gordon's names. Unfortunately that place is no longer there, and the replacement is a dismal hole-in-the-wall that was closed during the dinner hour.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.228.6.15 (talk) 01:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Conspiracy?? Why? WarrenOutsky (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the issue is just that it needs more sources. No conspiracy that I can find and believe me I would. Warren (talk) 17:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing History and Name Origin 

message: While local legend in San Jose is that Togo's was founded in downtown San Jose near San Jose State University, there's no solid evidence that "336 East William Street" was at the actual street number.  Better evidence needs to be substantiated.107.3.162.39 (talk) 07:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding location unsubstantial 

message: As Mentioned above, the first location was in Michigan.  The second location, and first California location was at the E. William Street address.  A photo exists taken in 1986 of the original location with an awning that says "The Original Togo's opened in the Spring of 1968.  336 East William Street".  The building still exists today.  It's now a palm reader/spiritualist business.T308 (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  First San Jose Location / E William Street.
Talk:Japanese Korean Army

message: I moved the title from Chosen Army of Japan to Japanese Korean Army since this is the only common name in English sources as I briefly addressed in the edit summary while moving. 
*0 on "Chosen Army of Japan" at Google scholar
*2 on "Chosen Army of Japan" at Google books (unreliable book whose contents are copied from Wikipedia) 
*0 on "Chosen Army of Japan" at Google news
*1 on "Japanese Chosen Army" at Google books
*1 on "Japanese Chosen Army" at Google scholar
*0 on "Japanese Chosen Army" at Google news
*1 on "Japanese Korean Army" at Google scholar
*25 on "Japanese Korean Army" Google books
*0 on "Japanese Korean Army" Google news
*0 on "Korean Army of Japan" at Google scholar
*0 on "Korean Army of Japan". Google books
*0 on "Korean Army of Japan" Google news
*0 on "Chosen-gun" Google news
*0 on "Chosengun" Google news
--Caspian blue 17:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The term Chōsen Army appears in the following Western-language sources, among numerous others:
 
*Blackburn, Carl. Forgotten Captives in Japanese-Occupied Asia. Routledge (2008), , page 114
*Clark, Donald N. Living Dangerously in Korea: The Western Experience, 1900-1950. Eastbridge (2003). , page 287
*Duss, Peter. The Japanese Wartime Empire, 1931-1945. Princeton University Press (1996), , page 29
*Humphreys, Leonard A. The Way of the Heavenly Sword:the Japanese Army in the 1920s. Stanford University Press (1995),  page 23
*Millett, Allan R. The War for Korea, 1945-1950: A House Burning. University Press of Kansas (2005). . Page 5
*Rottman, Gordon L. Japanese Army in World War II: Conquest of the Pacific 1941-42. Osprey Publishing (2005) . Page 10
The Google Books search gives several hits for Japanese Korean Army, but the seach engine also picks up the wording anti-Japanese Korean Army in its count, as well as instances of the phrase Japanese, Korean Army out of context. A number of reputable historians including Peter Duss use the term Chōsen Army, so it is not accurate to state that "Japanese Korean Army" is the only common name. --MChew (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks, but your sources do not still outnumber the number of sources to back up current title even though all matters are considered. The "presented sources" is the best one because "chosen" is the past tense of "choose", so just the Google related hits are very inaccurate. The term is also way much used for Israel-Palestine or bible-related subjects as well as other military topics such as Chinese armies. So "Chosen Army" is inherently "ambiguous", and "inaccurate" while there is absolutely not hit for "Chosen Army of Japan". So I don't think the retitle is a wise solution. If you insist that the macaroon should be used, well, I don't see that much in your source.--Caspian blue 05:30, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The title
Talk:Colossally abundant number

message: I removed the claim that all colossally abundant numbers are Harshad as uncited.  If anyone has a citation for a proof of this claim, please add it back.  Thanks, Doctormatt (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harshad-ness 

message: I just wanted to know what a colosally abundant number was and this page doesn't help... (thanks) Monkey Tennis (talk) 04:45, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this page mean? 

message: The article says "In their 1944 paper, Alaoglu and Erdős managed to show that the ratio of two consecutive superabundant numbers was always a prime number", but looking at the first few superabundant numbers shows this is clearly not true. They showed that the ratio aproached 1 for large n.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.178.217.23 (talk) 13:27, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ramanujan result from 1916 isn't really relevant to this section of the article, which is discussing the 1944 paper by Alaoglu and Erdős. I have removed the claim  about the ratio of consecutive superabundant numbers being a prime number - it wasn't essential in that paragraph anyway. Gandalf61 (talk) 11:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratio of consecutive superabundant numbers isn't prime
Talk:Han Seung-soo

message: The new president of South Korea is apparently making this guy the new prime minister, I have heard on several websites. Contralya (talk) 11:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prime minister 
Talk:Speedy Keen

message: Of the two references for the article, I was unable to find their exact source. Both links are dead. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 13:15, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The registrations of Speedy's birth and death give his name as "Keen" not "Keene", therefore I propose to change the article accordingly - unless anyone objects Peter Maggs (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved this article to Speedy Keen, because that is his commonly used name in wikipedia's sense, as on both solo albums, Guardian obituary, etc. "discogs.com" (for example) has different rules listing people (E-Kartoffel (talk) 16:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Malleability (cryptography)

message: 'Malleable' is a term used in the analyses of cryptographic algorithms:
Have a ciphertext C, and a plaintext P. C = E(P) meaning: C is the encrypted plaintext P.
With a malleable encryption algorithm it is possible to generate a C1 = f(C) so that P1 = f'(P) with arbitrary (but known) functions f and f'.
(this needs some linking from and to the math section).
An example of a malleable encryption algorithm is RSA.(you can contact me at avbidder@fortytwo.ch)
I've tried to expand this a bit, but it still needs some work.  It would be helpful to have a history of the term and the concept, some more examples of malleable and nonmalleable systems, a comparison with related concepts (what's the name for the one where you can derive C'=E(f(P)) without knowing P?), some constructions for nonmalleable systems, and a note on formulations of nonmalleable algorithms (e.g. superpseudorandom permutations). Victor Lighthill 03:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It wouldn't preserve the original content, but wouldn't digitally signing a message at least provide detection of modification?  Or is this even relevent to the article? Twiek 22:47, 11 July 2006
My suspicion is that for symmetric encryption, malleability and [authenticated encryption] fall together. But these notions are not the same for public key cryptography. There you don't need to know a secret key in order to create a non-malleable encryption.
Markulf 12:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For private-key encryptions, yes. If you take an encryption scheme secure under chosen plaintext attack, and append a MAC (like a private-key signature) of the ciphertext, you get a non-malleable (i.e, secure against chosen ciphertext attack) scheme. For public-key, it's more complicated. Blokhead 01:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signing 

message: Are not malleable encryption systems per definition susceptible to at least [adaptive chosen ciphertext attacks]. The [ElGamal] section of this articel claims such a weakness, but what is the difference to plain [RSA]? Why is ElGamal more "extreme" than RSA? 
Markulf 12:13, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Non-malleability is exactly equivalent to security against adaptive CCA. I think this was demonstrated in Dolev, Dwork & Naor's first paper that introduced the idea of malleability. Blokhead 01:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Malleability and Attacks

message: I think this article could be improved by adding a few words
on commutative encryption (as used in the three-pass protocol, some kinds of mental poker, etc.)
and its relationship to malleable encryption.
--DavidCary (talk) 05:31, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  commutative encryption vs malleable encryption
Talk:Philip Jessup

message: I am going to add more information about Jessup in the coming days.  This article was blatantly POV.  It assumed that the accusations of Communist sympathy leveled against Jessup during the 1950s were true and alotted undue attention to his involvement in IPR.  While a neutral discussion of those accusations and his involvement in that organization is in order, it is unfair to focus on such a small part of his career. 
I edited out the worst comments, while leaving what I believe to be a neutral summary of the Communist accusations against him.--JVB
:I agree some of it may have appeared POV, though not intentionally and it does not a degree of balancing.  Removing the souring from Hearings before the Senate subcommittee investigating the Institute of Pacific Relations however, is not going to work, or any citations derived therefrom.  I hope we can work together to achieve a fair balance and accurate picture. Thank you. Nobs01 17:01, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle (film)

message: I could probably scan the DVD, and credit the scan as such, if that's allowed.  I've always been curious, but after reading the plot summary, I can see why the movie bombed.  The article alone is hard to follow.  I imagine the movie is hard to follow as well.--The Bulldozer 00:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm... 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Kailash29792 (talk)  07:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: This source mentions the film was released on June 26, 2001 not February 2001 on VHS. Timur9008 (talk) 18:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  conflicting information  

message: Are you sure that the film is released in 2000? Mead1992 (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Rocky and Bullwinkle film 

message: I add that Rocket J. Squirrel and Bullwinkle J. Moose are the romantic couple husband and wife 181.15.218.66 (talk) 20:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Soon as you can find a reliable source for it. Q T C 20:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife forever
Talk:Crenellation

message: I've added the above notice because this article presently seems to confine itself to Western medieval architecture. Crenellation has been employed for centuries in Islamic architecture, for example in the Mamluk Qala'un Mosque of Cairo, Egypt (to take one of the many examples). For starters, see Behrens-Abouseif, Doris (1989) 'Architecture of the Bahri Mamluks'. In Islamic Architecture in Cairo: An Introduction. Leiden/New York: E.J. Brill, pp. 94–132. — mark ✎ 15:41, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Agree. One article should be able to cover this type of structure. Although redirects should be used for all the various terms. Brendandh 15:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: oppose merger.  it would be cumbersome and separate articles may be warranted anyway.  Crenellation does need some work on it. Anlace 17:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: totally hell no. I just felt like saying that. 02:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger with [[Battlement]]

message: The text from the licences to crenellate section seems to be a cut'n'paste job from http://homepage.mac.com/philipdavis/LtoCren.html. Was permission granted? Steventee 10:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Infringement?
Talk:Kolokol-1

message: Kolokol means bell in Russian. It is unclear wether this information would be of any interest to people trying to find out more about the chemical agent called Kolokol-1.
I think that yes, that it will be interesting, so I will change the article.--Oleg Str 10:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The article says:
:According to Lev Fyodorov, a former Soviet chemical weapons scientist who now heads the independent Council for Chemical Security in Moscow, the gas was originally manufactured in a secret KGB laboratory in Leningrad during the 1970s, and that in the subsequent decade methods of dispersing it were tested on the Moscow public without their knowledge. Furthermore, Fyodorov claimed that leaders of the failed 20 August 1991 Communist coup intended to use the agent to recover members of the Russian parliament.
Perhaps the source is linked below; if so, could it be referenced within the paragraph? Eric 19:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found the actual source. It's an article in Moscow's Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper of Oct 28, 2002, titled "Hostage Dealths Result from Special Forces Blunder?" Interviewed by the newspaper, Fyodorov said: "It was an incapacitating agent, a gas that temporarily disables the human body... A secret Institute for Very Pure Substances [translated literally] was created in Leningrad in the ealy 1970s. Peptides were developed there such that could affect human brain. It is in there where the incapacitating agent was long kept... It took a long time to learn how to use that weapon. They had to develop a means to release the gas in the atmosphere and disseminate it there uniformly... First [atmospheric release] experiments began in Moscow in the 1980s. Harmless bacteria were released in the Moscow subway [the Metro] through ventilation shafts. Later the experiments moved to Novosibirsk where a subway system was built to this end... It looks like it was the first time the incapacitatnt was used in the theater. In 1991, during the coup d'etat, an operation like that went abortive. Back then they intended to release it into the White House [Russian Parliament Building]."--129.128.45.126 01:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Fyodorov paragraph?
Talk:Tresco, Isles of Scilly

message: The annual marathon was first run on the island in 2000. The island is too small to run a point to point race and so seven and a half laps must be run to make the 26.2 miles. The event was organised to raise money for the Cystic Fibrosis Trust. 
--geodynamo
Good comments, when I have a chance I'll write under your proposed heading, that is unless someone else gets there before me...  --Cyr 14:49, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tresco Marathon 

message: The map needs to be replaced with one that shows the positions of New and Old Grimsby, the heliport and the abbey gardens. There is no settlement called "Tresco" as shown on the map.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 06:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The position on the map indicated as "Tresco" is really New Grimsby. The map belongs to a set of island maps but is not the best map for this article.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 06:16, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Category talk:Toys

message: What a hodge-podge! Is there a Toys or Games project somewhere that might discuss issues like this?  I started trying to put toys into appropriate subcategories, and discovered that there are at least 3 sets of groupings--
*:Category:Toys subcategories
*Toys groups
*List of toy brands groups
There's some agreement and some different terminology and some different styles of groupings that aren't mutually compatible (might or might not be OK).  So I thought maybe "we" should put some thought into subcategories for :Category:Toys, at least, and work backwards from there?  Anyone?  Elf | Talk 16:08, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Grouping/subcategories of toys
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/9 O'clock gun

message: I see many users want to merge the 9 O'clock gun page with the Vancouver page. I believe that the disputed page should be merged with the Stanley Park page as it is under developed and it simply fits better. There is also the fact that the Vancouver page is already fairly full. Zhatt 16:19, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vancouver Merge
Talk:Sedburgh

message: It's Sedbergh bot Sedburgh
Agreed! I wrote the Sedbergh page, and managed to spell the name of the town correctly, except for the title! The content of both pages together would be a good page for a town of its (small) size.
I've merged the text from this article into the Sedbergh one and changed this to a REDIRECT page incase of any links here. --Achmelvic 16:09, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:B-4 (Star Trek)

message: Was the song B-4 sang at the end really the same one Data tried to sing?  I thought Riker said it was a different one.  (I'd check, but my DVD is buried in a box somewhere after our move. :\ ) --Joe Sewell 16:41, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was. Riker wasn't even in the scene, so I'm not sure what you're thinking of. B-4 starts singing the tune Data sang (Blue Skies), but gets stuck, at which point Picard prompts him. We see Picard leave B-4's quarters with a smile. Cue teeth grinding from the audience. (Or maybe that's just me.) 131.155.99.4 14:42, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the song (User: Joe Sewell) is referring to ,that Riker tried to remember (While the senior officers mourned over Data) in the movie "Nemesis", was the tune Data tried to whistle (Pop goes the weezle) in the TNG episode Encounter at Farpoint. GoodDay 17:15, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The songs sung by Data in the TNG pilot and by Data/B-4 in Emesis are different. E Pluribus Anthony 17:32, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean, of course Nemesis. GoodDay 18:27, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course!  That's an in-joke of mine: Nemesis didn't wholly sit well with me, for various reasons. :) E Pluribus Anthony 18:39, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Song B-4 sang

message: Very suspect indeed.
:I'm not sure what is meant by that, but its simply a synopsis of much of the film Star Trek Nemesis, and so is somewhat undeserving of such a lengthy article Alastairward (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is somewhat 'suspect'.
Talk:William Heath

message: There is also an engraver named William Heath.  I don't know how to do a disambiguation page -- perhaps somebody else could do it....? NoahB 16:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I created William Heath (artist). Though there may be more than two William Heaths of note, so a disambiguation may be appropriate at some point. -- Infrogmation 13:30, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jan Eliasson

message: The reference in this article says that he gave the speech to the UN General Assembly on September 13, 2005. I'm guessing this is an error, but then it also matches what the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs site that it links to says. Either both they and we are wrong, or the speech is going to be given in a few months. Jsan 06:56, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Genetic Wuz

message: Guys, listen to yourselves, you sound like old women!? Don’t you have anything better to do then go and criticize someone’s page? So what if the English is broken? They are foreign for goodness sakes! And I agree with the statement that if you took of all the foreign contributions, there would be little left. So stop being such nurds and get a freaking life, rather then hammering on something so trivial? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.156.248.154 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 14 June 2005 (UTC)