Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Nickelodeon task force/Archive 1

message: Hi.  Thought you might like to know that your project is now listed on the :Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture, so more people might find out about it now.  Also, they have a :Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide, which might help you set up the project's page, goals, and methods more clearly, hopefully drawing additional members as a result.  Best of luck with the project.  Badbilltucker 20:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Listing of project and Guide

message: Since my Nickelodeon WikiProject is already existing, I suggest that we merge the two, but keep this title. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. Me too. 1ne 18:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So...are we merging? 1ne 07:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Eventually. We're trying to think of what to work on first. - A Link to the Past (talk) 22:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council is currently in the process of developing a master directory of the existing WikiProjects to replace and update the existing Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  These WikiProjects are of vital importance in helping wikipedia achieve its goal of becoming truly encyclopedic. Please review the following pages: 
*User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory 2, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Philosophy and religion Directory, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Sports Directory, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory, 
*User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory/United States, (note: This page will be retitled to more accurately reflect its contents)
*User:Badbilltucker/History and society directory, and
*User:Badbilltucker/Science directory
and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory.
The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. 
It is my hope to have the existing directory replaced by the updated and corrected version of the directory above by November 1. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 22:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry if you tried to update it before, and the corrections were gone. I have now moved the new draft in the old directory pages, so the links should work better. My apologies for any confusion this may have caused you. B2T2 13:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Directory 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 16:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: Hi, I've noticed today that the nickelodeon wikiproject template has been placed on both the article and discussion pages of various nicktoons cartoons (invader zim, hey arnold etc.). Is it policy to put wikiproject templates into the actual articles? Because I think it would be better off keeping it just to the discussion page as it's looks neater. --BillPP (talk) 13:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I'm answering my own question here but I've read up on the project banner section of the WikiProject guide and it says that the banner should be placed on the talk page of the articles in the scope of the project. So I'll just go ahead and remove the ones from the articles. --BillPP (talk) 01:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template placement 

message: I've just launched the new assessment scale. Please rate articles as you skimp along, because less than half of out 500 articles have been assessed. — JuWiki (Talk <> Resources) 21:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment scale 

message: Should we try to request a bot to assess our articles? We have 250+ articles that haven't been assessed... — JuWiki (Talk <> Resources) 23:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can do that easily. I mean, I've assessed many more articles than that. - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot 

message: Help is needed in taming kid-stuff on talk pages and some really nasty vandalism.  Since The Naked Brothers Band (TV series) premiered, vandalism to Michael Wolff has picked up, and there's been some nasty vandalism at either Nat Wolff or Alex Wolff (can't remember which).  Since Michael Wolff has Tourette syndrome, I'd appreciate any help Project members can give in watchlisting and vandal patrolling the kids' articles, particularly from the nasty TS jokes.  I also need help on the talk pages.  Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help needed 

message: I started a Wikiproject for Invader Zim a while back and at the moment there's very few active members. Right now it's running in a similar way to a task force (just editing targets, no article assessment, no bureaucracy, etc.). I'm proposing that it become a taskforce within the Nickelodeon wikiproject. How does that sound? If approved I can change the project into a taskforce immediately. ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 16:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good idea. We'd like a task force, so you may do it if necessary. — JuWiki (Talk <> Resources) 21:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Invader Zim|WikiProject Invader Zim]] 

message: The individual episode articles for Zoey 101 are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of Zoey 101 episodes#Episode article review. Thanks. --Jack Merridew 11:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of [[Zoey 101]] episode articles 

message: It appears that most if not all episode-articles of Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide have been tagged for deletion via WP:PROD and now sit in :Category:Proposed deletion as of 11 August 2007. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI: Episodes of ''Ned's Declassified'' 

message: :: --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion: Mighty Mighty Movie Friday 

message: Proposal
I hereby propose a task force for the Nick Jr. programming block.
The task force shall:
* Improve articles related to Nick Jr.; and,
* Remove vandalism from aforementioned articles.
Dalekusa 22:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes for Nick Jr. Task force. 

message: *Support - there are many Nick Jr. articles to improve, and this would be a great, yet small, task force. — JuWiki (Talk <> Resources) 22:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: Please note that this vote will end when at least 10 people have voted.
Dalekusa (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments and questions

message: I found a book in the bookstore called Not Just Cartoons: Nicktoons! by Jerry Beck. I'm not going to buy it and join the project, but I will ask the other members to get the book so that they can add real world information about various fictional characters.
This makes the creation of separate articles for *many* fictional characters feasible. Having information about the development of the character will make the articles satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) WhisperToMe (talk) 02:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: Get and use Not Just Cartoons: Nicktoons! by Jerry Beck 

message: Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 23:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralized TV Episode Discussion 

message: Hello everyone. I have created an ad for Wikipedia Ads. could please take the time to review it. I've created it by my self:
-Macy's123 (talk) 23:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Ad 

message: Hello everyone, i can only really help with 1990's Nickelodeon. As for anything later, I only consider myself an expert in All Grown Up! trivia. Basically because its still in my top 5 favourate shows! So if you need any help with All Grown Up! or 90's Nick, please feel free to ask me either here or on my talk page :-)  TheProf  |  Talk  19:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  90's Nick/All Grown Up! 

message: List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes has been nominated for the removal of its Featured list status. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:FLRC]] of [[List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes]] 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme 

message: Patrolling recent changes I found some anonymous edits made to Nicktoons Unite! article. As they were unexplained changes of content, I reverted them (with the proper edit summary). The same IP kept making changes (diffs , , , ). It may be sneaking vandalism, but I'm not familiar with the subject, so I couldn't say. I'm posting this notice in WikiProjects Nickelodeon, Video games and SpongeBob SquarePants so maybe somebody familiar with the subject can determine whether this is vandalism or not. --PeterCantropus (talk) 07:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicktoons Unite! 

message: Currently, 362 articles are assigned to this project, of which 119, or 32.9%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of .) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. More than 150 projects and work groups have already subscribed, and adding a subscription for yours is easy - just place the following template on your project page:
:{{}}
If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page; I'm not watching this page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles flagged for cleanup 

message: Hello. I just copy edited the page on The Amanda Show for several reasons. - PGSONIC (talk) 00:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Amanda Show]] copy edited 

message: I have made a Danny Phantom task force. It is fully prepared, with templates, userboxes, and it has even completed a quick cleanup of the Vlad Plasmius article. The only thing missing is members. It is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Nickelodeon/Danny Phantom. Tutthoth-Ankhre (talk) 21:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danny Phantom Task Force 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Nickelodeon 

message: I have just come back from User talk:Light Ichigo where not one, but two separate newsletters from this Wikiproject were incorrectly terminated and affected the contents of the entire talkpage (). If you cannot correctly code your newsletters, please either don't use sophisticated HTML coding, or refrain from sending newsletters all-together. The breaking of users' talks is unacceptable. +Hexagon1 (t) 10:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly terminated newsletter coding 

message: Hey guys the iCarly article needs some serious help. I'm thinking of making a list page for the iCarly characters (the character description takes up over half the article and it is almost completely unsourced). It you are against it fine, I won't make the page (post here, the iCarly talk page, or my user page as why you think I should or should not) but for now I'll be palying around with it. Also if someone could please go through and source the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paycheckgurl (talk • contribs) 04:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  iCarly 

message: Hi! I'm Dylan, the very latest member of WP:NICK. I joined on the grounds of my attempt to improve the Rocko's Modern Life article to GA-class. It's my favorite show, so I decided that since it was a very well-written article, I would nominate it at GAC. The topic could use some help a LOT of help; none of the articles are even at GA-class, and four of the articles are at Stub-class, which is more for any topic that I've seen so far. Rocko and Spunky could also benefit from expansion; although the former is B-class and the latter Start-class (Spunky is C-class with WikiProject Dogs), neither is at the level of a Good Article. Also disturbing is that two of this WikiProject's Top-Importance articles are Stub-class, and that only one article within the scope of this project–Animaniacs (which is only mid-importance)–is featured.
As a member of this WikiProject, I will try to improve these flaws, and improve some core articles (like SpongeBob SquarePants and Rocko's Modern Life) to FA-class. I also suggest task forces on shows that are of the utmost importance to the project (like Rocko's Modern Life and Rugrats) This gives me two WikiProjects to dedicate my time on Wikipedia to; I am already a member of WP:WPTC. Warm regards, Dylan620 (talk) 19:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: The template doesn't end, and wraps all my past messages. Please fix this in the future. Tenk you veddy much.  --Wack'd Talk to me! • Admire my handiwork! 23:40, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue with newsletter 

message: If you don't mind, I'm starting the Rocko's Modern Life task force. Any member of WP:NICK is welcome to join. Dylan620 (yadda yadda yadda • Ooooohh!) 11:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rocko 

message: I just say a copy of your newsletter on User_talk:Macy. Thumbs up on the newsletter presentation! I mean, wow. That is one of the best and surprising things I've seen on Wikipedia. -- Suntag ☼ 02:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thumbs up 

message: Every article that has one for WP:Nick has a link that read Wikiproject Nickelodeon/Invader Zim (note this on articles such as H20: Just Add Water that have NOTHING to do with Zim what so ever). Can this be fixed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paycheckgurl (talk • contribs) 01:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banner Shells 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: I just undid what I believed to be vandalism on the project page. It seemed to be something about The Mighty Bee in another language. Sorry if it served a purpose but to whomever created it, you deleted important infromation (like members' names)in the process and all edits on the English language Wiki have to be in...well English. If it was Vandalism, please knock it off.
Paycheckgurl (talk) 00:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? on page 

message: Characters from 1990s television need some help with references. Come see Tommy Pickles, Reptar‎, Angelica Pickles, Phil and Lil DeVille, Susie Carmichael, Dil Pickles, Lila Sawyer, they are all up for deletion. Contemporary shows tend to get the best coverage so we have articles on Moe Szyslak and Eric Cartman. There is a trend to delete show episodes and character biographies for pre 2000 telecasts. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with research 

message: I have decided to take the various disconnected articles about Nickelodeon's various weekday afternoon and summer programming blocks into a AfD nomination because many of them are completely unsourced or are sourced only with links via the network's site and PR. I welcome you to address your concerns about my nomination; I feel this has been a lingering issue as far as continuity and sourcing with each article that must be addressed because everytime Nickelodeon creates a new block, they don't seem to keep it and end it after three months. I would also definitely welcome a solution, such as a combined article about the blocks. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 09:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming blocks 

message: I have nominated List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes for featured list removal. You can place your opinion here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes/archive2 

message: List of films aired on Nickelodeon at AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films aired on Nickelodeon you might be interested. Kasaalan (talk) 17:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of films aired on Nickelodeon]] at AFD 

message: I'm new to the project, and just thought I would introduce myself. Sean (talk || contribs) 05:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Member 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Nickelodeon articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickelodeon articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: please expand the article.Alekhya Emani (talk) 16:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickelodeon-India 

message: I have edited text in some pages in very minor ways, but I don't yet know a lot of things here. If there is another place to post this idea, please let me know.
I would like to suggest that someone searching for "Nickelodeon" would find a note that Nickelodeon also refers to an American jukebox (see Wiktionary, where there is no reference to the channel/network). I don't know how these two pages (Wikipedia and Wiktionary) might be made more consistent, or even if they should be.
Of course, there may be an article somewhere (perhaps a stub) about the jukebox, but I can't find it. It looks to me as if the Disambiguation page should mention this, even if there isn't an article.
Thanks for your consideration.
J L Jaap
Jaapjl (talk) 16:44, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note, article, or stub for Nickelodeon (jukebox) 

message: An RfC has been filed here. Input from project participants will be appreciated. Thanks, Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on The Busy World of Richard Scarry 

message: Please feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Nickelodeon/Invader Zim (2nd nomination). -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As noted, this project has been already deleted. JJ98 (Talk) 05:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Nickelodeon/Invader Zim (2nd nomination) 

message: * Hi, I'm trying to establish consensus as to what data should appear at the Episode List of Fanboy and Chum Chum.  Please comment on the discussion page: Talk:List of Fanboy and Chum Chum episodes#Episode List Contents.  Thanks!  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode List of Fanboy and Chum Chum 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derek Iversen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Iversen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. 117Avenue (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[Derek Iversen]] for deletion 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Rosie O'Donnell#Does the "Chinese language parody" merit inclusion or not?.  RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue? 

message: After a recent request, I added WikiProject Nickelodeon to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Nickelodeon/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 01:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pageview stats 

message: Someone may want to take a look at :Category:-importance Nickelodeon articles. Template:WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants does not work properly. McLerristarr | Mclay1 12:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed it myself. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 07:44, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:-importance Nickelodeon articles 

message: This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:29, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
:Thank for notice Headbomb. We already have one. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 08:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Article alerts|Article alerts]] 

message: Greeting, I am a coordinator for WikiProject Animation. A B-Class checklist will be added to the project banner, along with the work group text, including the importance function. The B-Class checklist will include 6 point parameters to assess against the criteria. If you have any questions, please discuss at our talk page. Thank for your time. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 04:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class checklist for WikiProject Animation 

message: I found a potential source that could help:
*Banet-Weiser, Sarah. Kids Rule!: Nickelodeon and Consumer Citizenship. Duke University Press, 2007. , 9780822339939
It is available on Google Books
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential source 

message: Portal:Animation is currently a featured portal candidate. Please feel free to leave comments. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 23:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured portal candidate: Animation 

message: I  guess my question is why were they merged? If the point of this project is to make the pages on Nickelodeon better, wouldn't make more sense to have separate articles on the characters? That way, people could get a more comprehensive on the individual characters and those who don't wish to, can simply read the brief synopsis on the main article. I guess the concern is if more details are added, the main article might become unnecessarily large and flabby for lack of a better word. I hope this is the appropriate place to ask this question; if not, let me know. 
VirginiaBoyVirginiaBoy (talk) 04:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGING THE CHARACTER ARTICLES OF THE FAIRLY ODDPARENTS WITH IT'S MAIN PAGE 

message: Just in case anyone wasn't aware, there's a consensus discussion going on here. Sarujo (talk) 11:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heads up 

message: It has been suggested that WikiProject Nickelodeon to be merged into WikiProject Television as a task force since the project might be inactive or semi-active. After reviewing this project that it appears that there have not been any active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. If you have questions or comments, please let us know. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 10:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of this project into WikiProject Television as a task force 

message: Just in case anyone wasn't aware, there's a consensus discussion going on here. Sarujo (talk) 11:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heads up 

message: It has been suggested that WikiProject Nickelodeon to be merged into WikiProject Television as a task force since the project might be inactive or semi-active. After reviewing this project that it appears that there have not been any active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. If you have questions or comments, please let us know. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 10:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of this project into WikiProject Television as a task force 

message: Just in case anyone wasn't aware, there's a consensus discussion going on here. Sarujo (talk) 11:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heads up 

message: It has been suggested that WikiProject Nickelodeon to be merged into WikiProject Television as a task force since the project might be inactive or semi-active. After reviewing this project that it appears that there have not been any active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. If you have questions or comments, please let us know. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 10:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of this project into WikiProject Television as a task force 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (character)#What to do with the "Other Appearances" section.  Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (character)#What to do with the "Other Appearances" section 

message: I've placed SpongeBob SquarePants (character) for GAR. Please comment here for any concerns. JJ98 (Talk / Contribs) 10:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SpongeBob SquarePants (character) 

message: This related to all Nickelodeon shows please provide input here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Episode_list#Episodes_Numbers  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WP Editor 2012 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Numbers 

message: Please see the discussion here regarding the usefulness of No-importance in article assessment. Hiding T  08:17, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using No-Importance in article tagging 

message: Why not recruit dormant User:LRifle to the WikiProject. I know the user as the bureaucrat of the Fairly OddParent's Wiki. He/ she can help fix this article from its misery. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)   01:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have an idea... 

message: Template:Nicktoons guidelines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 70.24.250.26 (talk) 07:13, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for deletion]] of [[Template:Nicktoons guidelines]] 

message: has been nominated for deletion 
-- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Portal:Nickelodeon]] 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirk Fogg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirk Fogg  until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  RJaguar3 | u | t 16:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[Kirk Fogg]] for deletion 

message: Deletion of this file :File:Icarly-logo-2.png is now under review. Join in discussion by clicking WP:Deletion review#File:Icarly-logo-2.png. --George Ho (talk) 02:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Icarly-logo-2.png 

message: As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).
Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs. 
If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 05:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular pages tool update 

message: Would you be interested in participating in a user study? We are a team at University of Washington studying methods for finding collaborators within a Wikipedia community. We are looking for volunteers to evaluate a new visualization tool. All you need to do is to prepare for your laptop/desktop, web camera, and speaker for video communication with Google Hangout. We will provide you with a Amazon gift card in appreciation of your time and participation. For more information about this study, please visit our wiki page (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Finding_a_Collaborator). If you would like to participate in our user study, please send me a message at Wkmaster (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to User Study 

message: Hi all,
My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.
One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.
This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:
• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film
• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.
• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.
• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____
• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost
For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to: 
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 17:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaflet For Wikiproject Nickelodeon At Wikimania 2014 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Greetings  Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the  that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
* Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration.  Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards,  — Delivered: 18:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages

message: We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month,  will post at /Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of .
 
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
* The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
* The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
* The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to  for his original , and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of , and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular pages report 

message: I've nominated the article about the episode "Mother's Day" (Rugrats) for Featured Article consideration. This article is on the Mother’s Day special from the animated television series Rugrats, which aired on May 6, 1997. Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mother's Day (Rugrats)/archive1. Thank you for your time. Aoba47 (talk) 17:43, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother's Day (Rugrats) - featured article candidate 

message: Extreme Spots, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article Reassessment of [[Extreme Spots]] 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to convert many inactive WikiProjects into taskforces, including this one. --Gonnym (talk) 11:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turn this WikiProject into a WikiProject TV taskforce? 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Spongebob episode articles. Kingsif (talk) 13:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spongebob episode articles 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at talk:List of The Fairly OddParents characters#Vicky is a main AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fairly OddParents characters dispute