Talk:New Zealand Defence Force

message: This section needs updating. Adding the signing of the Wellington and Washington Declarations (2010-2012). Returning to formal military relations and resumed normal activities, Including NZDF/US Exercises ie; Rimpac,  and even inviting the US Southern Katipo and Alam Halfia etc. It was decided after the US watched how New Zealand responded to various incidents, Boungvillie, East Timor and New Zealand's actions in Afganistan etc to just work together and work around our differences.
2016 USS Sampson visited for the RNZN 75th anniversary, although diverted to help with the Kaikoura earthquake. NZDF has been fully at RimPac since 2012, and been involved in other training exercises in the US.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:5A00:D8C4:6800:A04A:BA88:DFE9:D419 (talk) 02:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Foreign defence relations

message: The image :Image:NZLAV.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:      File:New Zealand soldiers in Iraq, March, 2004.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:NZLAV.jpg

message: Foreign personnel. http://www.army.mil.nz/careers/overseas-applicants/default.htm  --Conor Fallon (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you actually see this as important enough? BlakJakNZ (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soldiers 

message: This page is completely outdated. It claims that the New Zealand National party is the "main opposition" of the government. I suggest it be updated, considering the National Party is now in power. DonutGuy (talk) 20:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Page 

message: Would it be better to keep this under this article or separate it into its own? What are peoples thoughts? NealeFamily (talk) 07:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest a new article Nick-D (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisation History 

message: An image used in this article, File:Nzairforce.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:37, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Nzairforce.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on New Zealand Defence Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090525184928/http://www.nzdf.mil.nz:80/news/media-releases/20070328-eedhobpm.htm to http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/news/media-releases/20070328-eedhobpm.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120511155613/http://nzdf.mil.nz/operations/hqjfnz/default.htm to http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/operations/hqjfnz/default.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on New Zealand Defence Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive  to http://www.stuff.co.nz/thepress/3995638a13135.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Zealand Defence Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130729083853/http://www.national.org.nz/Article.aspx?ArticleId=4873 to http://www.national.org.nz/Article.aspx?ArticleId=4873
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: This page could do with a lot more love.
For now I've updated what was the very out of date defence spending and troop numbers, 
but a look-over for the page in general from experienced Wikipedians would be awesome. — Expansewalker (talk) 14:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated spending & troop numbers (October 2018) 

message: With the release of the annual report for 2018 I was hoping to hear from other users about updating the current tri-service logo to a higher res image or possibly the newer logo featured on the report cover as seen here.
A Samoan news site has a well detailed Defence Force logo which includes the coat of arms and correct image type with .png transparency, see here. It lacks the tri-service logos underneath but as the page is focused on the Defence Force as a whole I think a larger/high-res coat of arms with relevant text would be more suitable.
And of course the NZ Defence website as well as many recent documents are utilizing the ubiquitous kiwi logo which has both white and black variants, white one featured here.
I would welcome any discussion on this. —Expansewalker (talk) 14:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Logo? 

message: Andrew is nonincumbent. Who is the current defence minister? Winston Peters!? 125.238.84.60 (talk) 09:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A new government has yet to be formed. Until then, and without any unusualities, I imagine Little will remain Minister of Defence. Feel free to update this page and that one when you hear the new announcements. — HTGS (talk) 05:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew Little no longer the current defence minister?