Talk:Sorbitol

message: So, right now, the article says:
:> This product is commonly used in "Sugar Free" products and since it is a sugar alchohol are those products truly sugar free?
Is that meant to be a rhetorical question?
Or is this one of those 'In Soviet Russia, encyclopedia gets information from you!' things?
:-- 67.161.46.135 03:44, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles that ask questions 

message: I read your very interesting article about Sorbitol, but what is it (Sorbitol) doing in most major brands of toothpaste, as the first ingredient, no less!?
Mysteriousmadamex 10:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in toothpaste as a humectant and a sweetener.  I'm not certain, but I think the bacteria that cause tooth decay can't use sorbitol an a food source, so sorbitol isn't bad for your teeth like other sugars. --Ed (Edgar181) 14:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorbitol... in toothpaste? 

message: Everytime I eat "Sugar-Free" Candy or Sours etc.  I get major major major gas and diarhea.  damn.
same here buddy, don't recommend sugar free extra. it was shitz-ville for a week  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.136.244.242 (talk) 17:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorbitol... CRAMPS!!! 

message: From the link to NIH provided in references:
sorbitol (SORE-bih-tall):    1. A sugar alcohol (sweetener) with 4 calories per gram. 2. A substance produced by the body in people with diabetes that can cause damage to the eyes and nerves.
Anyone who is in charge - please fix it in the artilcle! it is confusing!
I think the article is clear enough--it's the same substance.  It causes damage when it's inside the cells, but as a food, it's generally OK. I tried clarifying it. Jcarnelian 10:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 calories??? (again) 

message: I changed "severe gastrointestinal problems" to "gastrointestinal problems"; in a medical context, "severe" usually implies something like "potentially life threatening" or "potentially debilitating". Jcarnelian 10:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "severe" gastrointestinal problems 

message: It would be good to cover Sorbitol as an additive to cigarettes, and what happens to it when it burns.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.5.171.61 (talk) 20:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  As a Humectant 

message: Why isn't the current news story that Sorbitol leads to weight loss mentioned?
When it is, I'd like to see a discussion of the positive aspects as well: can Sorbitol be used as a prescription-free weight-loss substance?
Yeah, if you dont mind shitting 24/7 then yes it wokrs great!
85.227.226.235 (talk) 15:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide a link to a reliable news source? I read the BBC News site daily and have not heard of this. --Ouro (blah blah) 15:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Certainly you just need to eat enough sorbitol and your body won't take up many nutrients because they pass the digestive tract so fast. -> You will lose body mass. Now, what's the "breaking news"? 84.115.145.169 (talk) 15:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like "breaking wind" news!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.84.183.111 (talk) 15:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  breaking story 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Are there any studies that link the consumption of sugar alcohol (say, from chewing gum) to the attraction of mosquitoes? That might be an interesting topic to explore.
Ebuar (talk) 13:28, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indirect Side effects? 

message: This section (below) appears in the Hyaluronan article and mentions Sorbitol - so there appear to be two sections to add the Sorbitol page - that it is 'free radical scavanging' and that it's used to prolong the half-life of native Hyaluronan. I don't know anything much about Sorbitol but it looks like something to mention. EdwardLane (talk) 17:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be some link to Hyaluronan 

message: Sorbitol does not contain a C=O group as, the linked structure in the JMOL-Section shows. 
I have no idea how to chenge that, i cannot find any "JMOL" section in the wiki source code. --141.201.116.184 (talk) 05:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean the image you reach when you click Image 1 in the infobox?  That's outside of Wikipedia.  We can't change the image but we can remove the link to it, though I don't know how.  I'll leave a message at WikiProject:Chemicals.  The SMILES appears to be incorrect, too. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 10:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:   I figured it out.  Turns out the Jmol image is generated on demand based on the SMILES in the chembox.  Replacing the SMILES with a version from here corrected the Jmol. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 11:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cool! Now its correct, THX! --141.201.116.184 (talk) 06:52, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The structure in JMOL is wrong 

message: I'd expect some information on what foods people who can't eat sorbitol should avoid. Ananiujitha (talk) 22:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes, but what foods contain this poison? 

message: Where does the idea come from that succinate dehydrogenase acts on sorbitol, as stated in the first paragraph? The reference 1 does not support this idea, and it seems unlikely. Has someone simply confused the abbreviation SDH for sorbitol dehydrogenase with succinate dehydrogenase?
Roland.nilsson (talk) 16:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succinate dehydrogenase? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sorbitol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070630001051/http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CDG/content/CDG_sorbitol.asp to http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CDG/content/CDG_sorbitol.asp
*Added  tag to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0876/is_n67/ai_14676055
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090411071437/http://www.pharmacopoeia.co.uk/pdf/2009_index.pdf to http://www.pharmacopoeia.co.uk/pdf/2009_index.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: let's put everything in the same format, for example all molecules (all data, pictures, naming, left table, contents) like in mannitol article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mannitol or everything like in sorbitol article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.7.193.46 (talk) 11:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  format 

message: Jidanni (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: The solubility in water is given as 2350 g/L. I'm pretty sure this means 2350 g will dissolve in 1 L of water, which would be about 70 w%. Such a solution has a density of ~1.28 g/L so the volume will be much more than a liter. This is not what is meant by a mass concentration of 2350 g/L (but maybe this is the way solubility is expressed. If so that should be clarified before someone tries to make a 2350 g/L solution).Eaberry (talk) 04:19, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solubility