Talk:Dosimeter

message: The article says dosimeters must periodically be recharged. Does this mean they use a rechargable battery? Surely recharging must refer to something else, right? I was under the impression that the only purpose of the recharger was to zero the dosimeters. Can someone please clarify this for me? Thank you. Jecowa 11:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewrote article to explain operation better and address your questions.  Hope it helps.  --ChetvornoTALK 04:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recharging 

message: On my browser there are a trio of edit links visible at the bottom of the article. I've just popped into edit mode to tidy them up but I'm stumped, I can't see why they're there or indeed how to get rid of them.
Hopefully a more experienced/competent Wikipedian than me will have the answer. Cheers!
Beccaviola (talk) 00:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a solution, but the explanation is here: "Do not stack more images within a section than the text as this causes the images to continue into the next section and bunches up the edit links in some browsers". --Old Moonraker (talk) 21:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What about moving the images to a gallery with fuller captions? 21st CENTURY  GREENSTUFF 22:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good solution, but which one would remain as the lede mage? The two fiber dosimeter images complement each other and the other pair are different views of the same object. --Old Moonraker (talk) 09:15, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The fibre dosimeter image in the lede ... with a caption that says "Fibre dosimeter, the scale image is displayed below in the gallery" and its caption can read "Scale image of the fibre dosimeter shown above". 21st CENTURY  GREENSTUFF 10:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good: go for it! --Old Moonraker (talk) 13:00, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple edit links 

message: I've tidied this to changing technologies and use. The EPD for instance is now widely used, and QFE hardly. Dougsim (talk) 08:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 tidy-up 

message: This article reads like an advertisement, touting the features of a particular model.  I see no explanation of how these things operate, or how they are constructed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dosimeter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150410104912/http://www.mosfet.ca/global/pdf/technotes/te_4.pdf to http://www.mosfet.ca/global/pdf/technotes/te_4.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: No matter how many corrections I make to the author's awful grammar and communication, I can't fundamentally fix it. Since I am not a nuclear engineer and don't understand how they work, this responsibility sadly falls on somebody else. Anyway, I'm done with trying to make it better, I've gone as far as I can. 2603:7080:413F:69C8:3AD7:E64B:16B3:759 (talk) 04:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The entire section on Geiger tube dosimeters needs rewriting.