lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1987 World Touring Car Championship

message: An interesting mention for Riccardo Paletti as representative driver for one team, some five years after he was killed! Does anyone have any idea of how his name got here? A sure bet for deletion, surely. MRacer 12:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that "Paletti" should read "Patrese" as Riccardo Patrese drove for CiBiEmme Sport in at least one round of the 87 WTCC. Refer http://homepage.mac.com/frank_de_jong/Races/1987%20Monza.html
Cheers,
GTHO 06:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Riccardo Paletti

message: What does the Asterix (*) next to drivers such as Roland Ratzenberger signify? Independents? Thanks --80.4.6.146 (talk) 23:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing footnote?

message: Why are so many drivers disqualified in the first race? -- (talk) 13:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Texaco Sierras has illegal engine management system IIRC and pulled out before the race, but all the factory supported BMW M3's (at least half a dozen) had carbon fibre bootlids instead of the legal metal ones. Cheating was rampant during the first WTCC, the championship changed hands because of a disqual appeal that was finally decided three months after the series. Should go into a report on that race. --Falcadore (talk) 14:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disqualifications
Talk:Vanemuine (god)

message: Luk better: Vanemuine (symbol) --Wau2 21:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That article was created to present the view that it is not right to call Vanemuine a god. This is obviously the reason why the content here was cleared. But it is undeniable that Vanemuine was meant to be a god. Of course, secondarily, he is a symbol. So, the article Vanemuine (symbol) should be deleted or redirected here. Andres 22:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Made the other article into a redirect. DLX 13:18, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Would Vanemuine (Kalevipoeg) be a better title?  An intended god, if that is what it was, is not necessarily a god. 
GregKaye 06:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest move
Talk:Camarophyllus

message: Usually I don't add a detailed section on nomenclature to an article that's only a stub, however, there was some controversy about this group, so it needed to be covered. A note on Camarophyllus vs Cuphophyllus – the rules of botanical nomenclature clearly give priority clearly give priority to the older name in cases where there is more than one competing name for the same taxon, except in cases of conserved names, where there has been a formal decision by the International Botanical Congress to conserve a more recent name against an older one. Camarophyllus is the older of the two names and clearly takes priority; to the best of my knowledge, the IBC has never chosen to conserve Cuphophyllus against Camarophyllus. Peter G Werner 21:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added nomenclature section
Talk:2005 World Touring Car Championship

message: What do the pink backgrounds (two shades) and asterisks in the "Drivers and teams" table signify? DH85868993 (talk) 03:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This question is now irrelevant - the pink backgrounds and asterisks have now been removed. DH85868993 (talk) 11:28, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Artesunate

message: I've moved some data from Artemesinin into a separate Artesunate article. --Gak 21:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Artemesinin

message: Topic of an entire article in NEJM, free at http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/358/17/1774 JFW | T@lk 08:00, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Courtesy link:  A case study, so not WP:MEDRS but perhaps an interesting read for relevant parties nonetheless. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: NEJM

message: UCSF STUDENT 1 – Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify…
Yes, the draft submission reflects a neutral point of view since the article is purely informative without authors inserting their personal opinions. The article starts off with a good general overview of what the medication is used for and supplemented with a recommendation by WHO, the World Health Organization. While it could be debatable if this organization is biased, it is a well-known global organization that the authors state a recommendation from without incorporating their own opinion if the recommendation is valid. In addition, the authors also state the U.S. FDA recommendation. The neutral point of view is also evidenced by the citation of WHO and the CDC in treatment regimen. The mechanisms of action  and pharmacokinetics section also stay neutral as the sections are properly cited to support the chemistry behind the medication. The adverse effects and warnings and contraindications sections are neutral, but the spelling and grammar could be cleaned up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christineyu247 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: UCSF Fall 2016 assignment

message: I summarized the randomized controlled trial (Phu et al 2011) and review (Li and Weina 2010) to the best of my ability, and I welcome any improvements to those summaries. The text came from Project 523 and seemed to bear unbridled enthusiasm for artesunate over artemether. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparisons to artemether
Talk:Software system safety

message: Much (all?) of this article appears to have been copied from http://www.monmouth.army.mil/cecom/safety/sys_service/software_handbook.htm.  This source might be public domain if it is a work of the US government (as opposed to simply being published/hosted on a government websitee.Sagsaw 21:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article source

message: "In the past, industry in general considered increased productivity as the most important aspect of Software Engineering. Little consideration was given concerning the reliability or safety of the software product."
This is not true and has never been true. Embedded software systems have always had to take into account system and MCU resource failures. That's is why there are FMEAs both systems and software, ram checks, rom checks, illegal opcode checks, dual core microprocessers, etc. which have been around for 2 decades.  I would guess that the author of this statement had a PC application background. However, that doesn't make his/her viewpoint true in general.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.19.210.7 (talk) 13:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Statement about history of safety importance.
Talk:Hygrophoraceae

message: A fairly extensive discussion on the taxonomy and nomenclature of the Hygrophoraceae and its genera can be found at Talk:Hygrocybe. Peter G Werner 21:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy and nomenclature
Talk:Nuala O'Faolain

message: There is an error on this page that I don't know how to fix. The link to Nuala O'Faolain's father takes you to the page of an American actor. I think that her father was an Irish journalist. 240457laf 13:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father 

message: It's sort-of crazy that no gung-ho Irish Language cranks go through this and other Irish pages giving us the correct pronunciations of these incomprehensible Irish names. For Americans -- and even more so, non-native-English speakers -- this celtic stuff is incomprehensible. It's the ENGLISH language wiki: we need as much help with Irish or Welsh as we do with Czech or Chinese. 4.231.254.245 (talk) 03:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: No mention in the article of her numerous anti-men articles in the Irish Times in the 1990s?  She was quite prolific on the topic for a while.  213.155.151.239 (talk) 17:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Misandry
Talk:Fort Osage

message: they sell, or at least they used to sell, "osage honey" at the Fort Osage historical park gift shop, like it was some kind of historical thing, availability of honey at the trading post. Packaged with the honeycomb. Yum. 75.87.138.107 (talk) 11:08, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osage honey 
Talk:The Ballad of the White Horse

message: Essentially complete
APAULCH 01:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Well, I gave this whole article a peer review, as requested. But it seems the original editor who requested it hasn't checked in since then. If anyone is interested in improving this article, please consider my review, Wikipedia:Peer review/The Ballad of the White Horse/archive2. --Midnightdreary 12:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: out of the mouth of the mother of god 
like a little bird come i 
for i go gathering christian men 
from sunken pavement field and fen 
to die in battle, god knows when 
by god, but i know why.
I used the same chosen text that was in the main reference. I don't want to put my personal bias into what parts of the poem are important and what are not, so I used the reference as a model.
APAULCH (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  this section has no intent 

message: Pursuing that connection would be of interest.
The Scouring of the Horse v. The Scouring of the Shire, and so on.
Varlaam (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The connection appears to be the use of the word "scouring" ... I wouldn't read too much into it if I were you. 62.196.17.197 (talk) 10:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tolkien 

message: This article may need to be neutrality checked with respect to a Catholic POV  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1980:1069:CEB:C7A:7C34:1154 (talk) 05:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV check
Talk:Pender Island

message: This article by Terry Glavin, formerly a resident of Pender, covers a lot of aboriginal history as well as the details of the politics and archaeological site/former native village that is now Poet's Cove Resort & Spa.....Skookum1 (talk) 04:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a History section, incorporating a few details from the article above as well as other sources.  Hopefully someone with real knowledge of the island's history can expand it (ideally, in my opinion, giving due weight to the small but ancient indigenous presence on Pender). Jd4v15 (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: material for update/expansion

message: I'm a relatively new editor, in terms of experience, so I'm still not sure what constitutes wording an article like an advertisement for hotels or shopping malls or newspapers and what constitutes encyclopedic content. Help/guidelines? MADaboutforests (talk) 22:27, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:Cabela's Dangerous Hunts 2

message: WHy was this section undone? This is not irrelevant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.2.48.79 (talk) 22:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: biological inaccuracies

message: There's a Kaftar in the game. There is no Yeti that is likely vandalism. -James Pandora Adams  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.168.148 (talk) 21:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have something that you can use as a refernce for this? It would be great to get it right and have that information in the article. Leefkrust22 (talk) 04:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  You forgot the Kaftar 

message: This reads like a strategy guide, which is mentioned on the what wikipedia is not page. The plot section needs to be totally redone.  The excessive use of the word "you" doesn't seem right either.  I feel like it should be from the perspective of the character or, at the very least, the "player".  Thoughts? Leefkrust22 (talk) 04:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video game strategy guide
Talk:Cleeve Abbey

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "MRJames" :
** . Much of the abbey's medieval tiled flooring remains. Other major survivals include the abbey gatehouse, which still provides entrance to the visitor, the moat and fishponds. Cleeve is open to the public.
The remains of the buildings have been designated by English Heritage as a grade I listed building, and it is listed as a Scheduled Ancient Monument.<ref>
** 
DumZiBoT (talk) 06:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe I've now fixed this - it was a missing "/" in the ref reuse template.— Rod talk 13:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references !
Talk:Saturna Island

message: User:Blodstenvagen is breaking the neutrality of the article Saturna Island. The Gulf Islands National Park Reserve should be in Parks and Beaches because it is a park. Also, to quote "East Point is a place popular for onshore whale watching. It is also the site where Moby Doll, the first orca ever live-captured for aquarium display, was unfortunately harpooned in 1964." Please, do not include unneutral  phrases.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cascadia630 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of the article
Talk:331 model

message: In the 331 model#Details section, T₃ and T₈ are used as scalars in the scalar formulas for electric charge Q and hypercharge Y, but are described as “Gell-Mann matrices” in the text. The definition of T₃ and T₈ needs a touch-up / minor rewrite: I suspect that they are coefs. for linear combination of the two diagonal Gell-Mann matrices λ₃ and λ₈, which have linear combinations that are elements in two of the three triplet sub-algebras of the group. Alas, I can only guess: could a competent quantum mechanist please help?71.94.235.196 (talk) 05:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious T₃ and T₈ descriptions
Talk:Morven, New South Wales

message: Have rated this as a Low importance article for WikiProject Riverina.  I am happy if others feel it should be rated Mid.--Mattinbgn/ talk 03:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:2008 World Junior Ice Hockey Championships

message: This article was rated B, however there are just 2 references and 4 lines of text, plus a load of stats. This is stub class. Cloudz679 06:52, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject assessment 
Talk:Yona Wallach

message: I've begun moving the revised Yona Wallach page from my sandbox to the live page. Practically everything needed to be updated and properly cited, which I hope to have done. There was one longer section already present in the article, but I found that it was lifted from goodreads.com (so I deleted it and will be adding my own). I'll move over my work in sections as recommended in the training. Also, I could not, for the life of me, find an openly licensed photo of Yona to include on the page. If anyone can do that, I think the article would benefit greatly from it! Jnf2 (talk) 16:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul
Talk:Kevin Doyle (actor)

message: he is rubbish  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.164.2 (talk) 09:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sutphin Boulevard–Archer Avenue–JFK Airport station

message: This is why I renamed this article to "Jamaica Center–Parsons/Archer (New York City Subway)": the "Archer Avenue Line" is not one line shared by two divisions (whatever that means). There are two completely distinct and separate lines running under Archer Avenue, which use different radio frequencies for communication, have different chaining designations, and have no physical connections. In fact, the lower level could be considered part of the BMT Jamaica Line, while the upper level could be seen as part of the IND Queens Boulevard Line. We consider them separately (oops) together for historical reasons (i.e., they were built at the same time), but the two levels are not one line. In fact, the article Archer Avenue Line is highly misleading. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 21:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.subwaynut.com/ct/sutphine/index.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  epicgenius (talk) 13:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Benedictine (spread)

message: Are the cucumbers shredded or pureed before they are added to the cream cheese? Whitebox (talk) 04:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the original recipe, they are juiced.  In more modern variants, the cucumber is deseeded and chopped. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 20:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Juan de Fuca Marine Trail

message: I do not believe "builder of the trail" is a valid citation, and the section reads very politically biased. Is it possible to clean this up with better citations? I wanted to remove the section but do not use Wikipedia often and was not sure if that was an appropriate solution. I also think it could be improved, as someone reading this article may be very interested in the actual (cited) history of the trail's development, but I don't know much about this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.87.167.94 (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor source in "Establishment" section
Talk:Darley Abbey

message: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 January 8 (Saint Mary's Catholic School) is relevant to this article. BlueValour 03:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion review 
Talk:Dorchester Abbey

message: It would be useful to state if the picture Menorah by Roger Wagner is still in the abbey. Rich Farmbrough, 16:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Menorah
Talk:Dore Abbey

message: I have added ==edit== to History. I have added verifiable information and referenced links about King John and Dore Abbey. I hope this can be included. I hope I am signing correctly. (BethANZ (talk) 15:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitory modified 
Talk:Enigma (yacht)

message: Yachtspotter, please stop adding the paragraph about this yacht's inability to keep staff.  It appears to have a strongly negative bias, and you offer no evidence that it is accurate.  If you have a source for your information, you can post it here in the talk section. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please stop
Talk:Pleasant Valley War

message: The tone of this article seems rather inappropriate for an encyclopedic article. It frequently engages in editorializing and subjective judgements. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: "The conflict was commonly thought to be an Arizona sheep war". Since this is wrong, why not delete it? Why would it be necessary to include someone's ignorance about this subject in an Encyclopedia? Shouldn't the article just state the facts: that it was a territorial conflict between two families, over grazing land?    Senor Cuete (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is good to include that it was commonly thought to be a sheep war. Sheep wars were at that time relatively common, so the assumption was natural. That it wasn't true doesn't mean it isn't part of the factual history of the Pleasant Valley War. As an analogy, it would be like writing an article on the history of Mars and not including the fact that people used to think Martians had cities there tucked away in canals. Hilariously ignorant, but still part of the history. That's my opinion, at least. Ljpernic (talk) 16:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually unattributed statements like that aren't included in encyclopedic articles and are not allowed in a Wikipedia article as WP:WEASELWORDS.  Senor Cuete (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: So you asked for opinions and then changed it anyway? Not worth fighting about, but poor form.Ljpernic (talk) 22:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

text: Generally changes aren't discussed in advance. This is unusually courteous for Wikipedia and text such as the WP:WEASELWORDS in the article, may be removed without comment.  Senor Cuete (talk) 14:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheep war 

message: I have recently expanded half of the subsections and fixed the referenes.112.198.64.48 (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: The caption under the images of the Flying V cabin state that John Tewksbury Sr. lived there with his two wives, but we never hear of that person again.
Later, a John Tewksbury Jr gets murdered next to a cabin. It is unclear which of the two, if any, is the child of the original Ed Tewksbury listed at the beginning of the body of the article.
As for Ed, he had a child named Ed, and yet nowhere in the article is it ever specified if an action is performed by Ed Sr. or Jr. Since ONE Ed was the sole male survivor of the family, that means that the other was killed, meaning neither of the two is irrelevant to the story, meaning we can't just assume that all mentions of Ed are to be understood as meaning Ed Sr.
Some clarity is needed. 37.163.192.27 (talk) 07:31, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ed Sr/Jr, John Sr/Jr
Talk:Harris's lament

message: I am not going to contest this prod, but the prod was added while I was still working on the article and before I had a chance to add all the references.  I started this article so that I could remove some of this information from host name and I didn't want it to be lost.  Maybe I'm too much of an old-timer and this saying has passed out of use. Wrs1864 21:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the data should survive, here or in scarcity or in both. -- Jeff G. 23:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion
Talk:Perry Owens

message: Why is this page named "Perry Owens" when the subject's name is clearly "Commodore Perry Owens"?
212.102.52.134 (talk) 18:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  page name
Talk:Masajiro Miyazaki

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 00:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I don't have a copy of My Sixty Year in Canada, which has his origin information in it, including birth place and parents, training etc and an account of his professional practice in Vancouver etc.  I think it was Naha he was from, but I'm not certain, maybe Naha Prefecture, it's been a while since I read the "book" (a typeschrift only).  Also if someone from WP:Japan is here, perhaps his name in Japanese characters would be a good addition.  I'll look in the Nat'l Archives of Canada for a portrait, since he was an Order of Canada winner.Skookum1 (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins in Japan etc.