lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Health and Wellness Center (Marshall University)

message: Article primarily fails on criterion 3 (broadness of coverage) and criterion 5 (stability) of the good article criteria. Some minor issues with criterion 1 (prose and grammar), as the article could use a good copyedit and clean up and wikify some of the text. The prose gets a little choppy at times. Primarily, the article fails to address the importance of the building. Why is there a wikipedia article about this? What is the significance of this building? The article is mainly written in the style of a new building announcement or press release for Marshall University, and could really be condensed into 2-3 sentences and placed into the article on Marshall University. It should also be pointed out that the article on the university itself is not yet a GA, so perhaps the editor's time would be better spent on getting that article up to GA status, rather than on a rather unremarkable and incomplete building on the campus.
Furthermore, I raise the issues with criterion 5 (stability), not on the fact that the article has undergone rapid edits (most edits to the article are by one person), but moreso due to the fact that the building is not due to begin construction until July, and not due to be completed until 2009, so much is very likely to change between now and then. This is also illustrated by the 'future building' template attached to the article. Dr. Cash 21:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comments! I'm still learning what is and is not acceptable to the GA process. While I do not agree that condensing the building to a few sentences would be adequate, since there is a page devoted to the structures of the university (the page would become very lengthy), I will take in the suggestions and improve this and the Marshall University article.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 21:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Drmaik

message: User:Drmaik
      run at Thu Feb 1 16:00:01 2007 GMT
Category talk:	1
Image talk:	3
Mainspace	982
Portal:	1
Talk:	81
Template talk:	1
Template:	1
User talk:	35
User:	52
Wikipedia:	18
avg edits per article	2.44
earliest	07:28, 29 December 2005
number of unique articles	482
total	1175
2005/12 	13 	
2006/1 	51 	
2006/2 	26 	
2006/3 	99 	
2006/4 	85 	
2006/5 	214 	
2006/6 	112 	
2006/7 	60 	
2006/8 	25 	
2006/9 	42 	
2006/10 	98 	
2006/11 	44 	
2006/12 	174 	
2007/1 	116 	
2007/2 	16 
Drmaik's editcount summary stats as of 16:00, February 1st 2007 using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 16:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Holistic Design

message: I did some research and could not readily find some sources. I have added notability following on from a deprod where mentions the interlinked pages. That was my first thought but only one of the linked pages seems not to have issues so I have added notability as I am not sure that the company was notable and the designers who are notable seem to be more connected with other companies.Tetron76 (talk) 19:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like the deletion crew is at it again.  It's pretty notable and set to become more soon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.162.4.23 (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: notability
Talk:Rumbold of Buckingham

message: I have never known for this 19th century congregational church to be referred to as St Rumbold Church. It is currently the Radcliffe Centre, University of Buckingham. Is there a reference to confirm this old name? <B>Warren</B> (talk) 10:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church of St Rumbold? 

message: He is not referred to as 'Rumwold of Buckingham' as far as I can tell, so the renaming of the article is wrong; locally he is referred to as St Rumbold, and even the old diocesan city of Lincoln has a street with his name as Rumbold. I've not seen any reference to suggest that this new article title is right. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 22:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Rumwold is the Old English form of his name, but they are the same name. He is called Rumwold in many reliable sources,gbooks including Blair's "Handlist of Anglo-Saxon Saints". Buckingham (the location of the shrine) distinguishes him from the saint of Mechelen and the lost saint or saints commemorated at Romaldkirk in Yorkshire and Haugh in Lincolnshire. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 22:09, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  You misunderstand my question; it is clear that the name is spelt many ways, but it is the naming of the title with the town name. It is more likely to be known as Rumbold of Buckingham, rather than Rumwold of Buckingham, (Sir George Clarke, The Legend of St Rumbod, Journal of Northamptonshire Record Society vol III no 4 1963; Rodney Shirley The strange tale of St Rumbold of Buckingham, Buckingham Society 2008) and this new name may make it harder to find for those not so well versed on the historical spellings. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, you said "He is not referred to as 'Rumwold of Buckingham'", and I was just showing that this is not true. Often it's better to use standard Old English forms as they are more rational ... i.e. someone interested in OE history who is not knowledgeable about Buckingham would be more likely to find Rumwold. You see, all over England you get all different weird modernizations of old saints, but the popular OE forms are standard. It's about balance. If you think there will be genuine confusion with Rumwold as opposed to Rumbold, then by all means move it to Rumbold of Buckingham (but check that gbooks link I posted if you want to verify its use). Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 22:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a redirect from St. Rumbold of Buckingham which will help anyone who is studying general local history rather than formal Old English history. Thanks for the gbooks link - I hadn't had a chance to see first hand the R Love text, so that was helpful, and added the feast day while I was at it. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 22:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't understand the new name 

message: One of the "six surviving churches" is in Bonnington in Kent, on the edge of Romney Marsh: https://www.achurchnearyou.com/church/12105/   Thomas Peardew (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Six Surviving Churches
Talk:Emerson, New Jersey

message: As of April 1, 2006, out of a 2004 Census estimated population ...
I'm removing the "As of April 1, 2006," because that date has nothing to do with the 2004 census estimated population. 
Please post corrections to discussion if you feel this is in error.
SLATE 16:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar and timeframe issues 
Talk:Ai Tominaga

message: The page I believe erroneously stated that she was born in November of 1980 when the Japanese page lists it as August 1 1982.  Evidence to support this is at  which states she is 26 years old, not 28 if she had been born in 1980.  Also the English page already had a category of "1982 births". I've corrected her birthdate to August 1 1982. Unimaginable666 (talk) 02:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her Birthdate 
Talk:William Frederick Yeames

message: I've removed the phrase claiming that the tableau is on permanent display at Tussaud's, since that wasn't the case when I was there on Dec 26 last year (which suggests it's not permanent). Everything I can find online about it goes as far as to say that the tableau was produced and was displayed at some point, but not permanently. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "On permanent display" 

message: I don't know if the interpretation of this painting as stated in this article is the universally accepted one, but I don't agree that the interrogators are depicted sympathetically. To my eye, they appear more to be bullies. Admittedly their body language is subtle and quite open to interpretation. The guard behind the girl can be seen as preparing to push her forward for interrogation. If one looks closely, the guard's arm is poised in a position typical of someone about to move the arm forward in a thrust. It is not resting around her shoulders as one might ordinarily expect of a comforting gesture. My interpretation of this picture is that it is meant to convey a subtly menacing theme. 174.89.81.76 (talk) 04:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Subtly menacing with more than a touch of insincerity in the questioner's expression. The other Parliamentarian figures look impassive, certainly indifferent to the girl's and the women's suffering; their sole interest is in the  boy's response, even the one supposedly comforting the crying girl. I don't think this should be presented in Wikipedia's voice as if it's authoritative. WP Ludicer (talk) 19:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "And When Did You Last See Your Father?"
Talk:Glossary of poetry terms

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 16:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: IMO the List of basic poetry topics is an unnecessary POV fork of Glossary of poetry terms: who says that some topics are basic and more importantly, why we need a list of "basic"?  Mukadderat 19:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Lists of basic topics are a set of lists that serve as a table of contents system for Wikipedia.  It is used by a lot of people and shouldn't be dismantled.  Removing its poetry subject will create a gap in that system's coverage.  The intended scope of the two pages is different, and this glossary may eventually grow to be much more comprehensive.  The list of basic poetry topics is intended to remain fundamental (introductory level, providing an overview of the subject in a standard cheat sheet format).  The Transhumanist (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion

message: This glossary was more like a mere list than a glossary.  Therefore I moved the non-glossary entries to a wish list section below until definitions are added to them.  The Transhumanist (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: The article currently says:
: Below, "short/long" definitions of a syllable of classical languages correspond to "stressed/unstressed" of English language.
Surely this should be:
: Below, "short/long" definitions of a syllable of classical languages correspond to "unstressed/stressed" (respectively) of English language.
But I don't know enough about the subject to be sure.
Adam1729 (talk) 06:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short/long and stressed/unstressed
Talk:Government Palace, Peru

message: Shouldn't it say "rebuilt" in 1937?  The introduction says it was "built" then, and then talks about Pizarro...it's a bit nonsensical.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.231.243 (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction Date 
Talk:Becket-Chimney Corners YMCA

message: I fixed a bunch of minor punctuation and wordiness issues, and took out a few things that would be fine in a brochure for the camp but probably don't belong in an encyclopedia. This article should probably be reduced even farther, to about half or less its current length. The Chimney Corners camp stuff, for example, seems like a separate topic. BP  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.0.186.234 (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: When an edit is "undone", it is required that an edit summary be left, except in cases of blatant vandalism. 
In an attempt to change this article from an "online brochure" into an encyclopedia article, I made a number of edits, which were promptly reverted by Jmansfield2021, who left no edit summary. I'm inviting that user to discuss changes to the article here on this Talk page. Keep in mind that I understand that other camps have equally promotional articles on Wikipedia, and am in no way attempting to create an unlevel playing field for Camp Beckett. Wikipedia must maintain its standards.--Quisqualis (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen this in other articles about summer camps. Understand please what an encyclopedia article is. The purpose of an encyclopedia article isn't to disseminate information about the subject. Its purpose is to summarize what others have written about the subject in reliable secondary sources. That's all. I've reverted more, and much more needs to go. John from Idegon (talk) 19:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that you've removed everything, I think it might be a good idea to pause and let some content be added from the sources that can be found.  If that doesn't happen anytime soon, then maybe AfD.  Dicklyon (talk) 05:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2019: Reversion without giving an edit summary 

message: - Update information on reach
- Add information for joint section that applies to both Chimney and Becket
- Only reference campers as such Getsillymilly (talk) 02:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming edits that I will complete soon
Talk:Annie Famose

message: I would like to tell (cit. German Wikipedia) and by knowing by myself, that Mr. Famose was awarded at later time with the silver medal. - Okay, she did finish 3rd, but after Erika Schinegger's "disqualification", Mr. Marielle Goitschel was awarded with the gold medal, Mr. Famose with the silver medal (and Mr. Burgl Färbinger with the bronze medal). 213.225.0.117 (talk) 11:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silver medal in the downhill race in the FIS Alpine World Championships 1966 

message: At first, Mr. Famose did finish the downhill race on February 5th (becoming 8th). But on February 9th, she was banned by the FIS because her accompanying commentaries for "Radio Television Luxembourg" which were commercialized. (Cit.: German Wikipedia and "Arbeiterzeitung Vienna" from February 10th, 1972). 213.225.0.117 (talk) 12:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentaries for "Radio Television Luxembourg" at the 1972 Winter Olympics
Talk:American Shipping Company

message: Particularly its History section. Sources are available in the references section of the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article could use updating

message: The history section describes a predecessor to Philly Shipyard (a shipyard) which is separate from American Shipping Company (a shipper). Xofg (talk) 01:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflating two entities related to Aker ASA
Talk:Tunku Ismail Idris

message: i want to see photo tunku ismail ibrahim  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.82.6.209 (talk) 07:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: salam sejahtera kepada tmj kesayangan warga johor..
 saya parthiban(warga johor) ingin berkongsi pendapat dgn tuanku,ramai warga india johor tidak 
 dapat perluang perkerjaan di sektor kerajaan. contoh,adik saya telah memohon kerja kerajaan 
 selama 2 tahun.. tapi tiada apa2 pun jawapan hingga kesaat ini. mungkin tuanku boleh    
 beri peluang pekerjaan kepada warga2 india . saya mohon sesangat2 tuanku boleh mengambil 
 lebih ramai warga2 india johor bekerja disektor kerajaan. 
 
 
  Parthiban a/l Balain
  801008-01-5419 
  shmoperation@gmail.com
  012-7206714  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.49.73.26 (talk) 08:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ramai warga india dijohor kurang dapat peluang bkerja di sektor kerajaan dijohor.
Talk:STX Europe

message: Wadan Yards is bankrupted - http://www.valoronline.com.br/ValorImpresso/MateriaImpresso.aspx?tit=Recess%C3%A3o+leva+estaleiros+alem%C3%A3es+%C3%A0+concordata&codmateria=5616700&dtmateria=12+06+2009&codcategoria=164&tp=931539242&scrollX=0&scrollY=285&tamFonte=  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.86.157 (talk) 05:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aker, Norway

message: For the location the en.wikipedia gives coordinates for a spot near the Bispevika harbour, slightly east of the mouth of the Akerselva. The equivalent bokmål gives a location at the harbour near the radhus, more that a kilometre away. I know that ascribing a single point to a rather imprecise area isn't a perfect business, but that's a non-trivial discrepancy. -- Finlay McWalter ☻ Talk 14:23, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coords query
Talk:Akershus

message: There are more than two hospitals in Akershus.  Of the two mentioned in the article, Akershus Universitssykehus is the largest in the county, and one of the largest in Norway, while Sunnaas is a small hospital that specializes in physical therapy and rehabilitation. Sykehuset Asker og Bærum, which is not mentioned, is a large general hospital.  In general terms, Akershus Universitetssykehus serves the east half of the county and some of the eastern parts of Oslo, while Sykehuset Asker og Bærum serves the west half of the county as well as some of the western parts of Oslo.  Both have smaller "satellites" throughout the county, including smaller general hospitals, specialized clinics, and local emergency clinics.  DES (talk) 23:40, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hospitals 

message: The airport at Rygge is actually located in Østfold County.
--Egd81 (talk) 03:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airports 

message: This article states that Oplandenes was separated from Akershus in 1768 which later split to become Hedmark and Oppland. However the articles on Hedmark and Oppland both state that the initial split took place in 1757. Can anybody shed any further light on this to improve the consistency between these articles? MWchat (talk) 09:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates confusion 

message: So, the article says Akershus is a former county. But the introduction doesn't include what county it's now in (2020)? I have a suspicion that it is now in Oslo County, but then again, there's not a Wikipedia entry for Oslo County (only for the city of Oslo, and Greater Oslo). Can someone in-the-know edit the intro to include where the county now is? - Hooperswim (talk) 19:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's 2020: where is Akershus now?
Talk:Pickawillany

message: Should this really belong to the France portal?  It was a purely Miami village, on land contested by two European imperial powers.  If anything, Pickawillany was an affront to supposed France superiority because the Miami dared to trade with someone else. Mingusboodle 22:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I mention Pierre Joseph Céloron de Blainville's visit to Pickawillany:
*Talk:Pierre Joseph Céloron de Blainville#Pickawillany
I think the mention of should go in that article and this article as well.  A number of resources mention it.  --David Tornheim (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Céloron's visit to Pickawillany
Talk:Aksel Sandemose

message: Actually he fathered seven children, not five...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.135.143.222 (talk) 21:49, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the claim, as well as the preceding sentences, as they were indeed exaggerated (and uncited). --Saddhiyama (talk) 10:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aksel Sandemose
Wikipedia talk:Protected titles/Historical list of titles/XRumer spambot

message: Corrected version below: (I didn't realise the namespace had to be specified separately from the page title.) Flyingtoaster1337 16:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Why don't we create sections for now? Or split in subpages like A-H, I-M, N-Z, or similar? -- ReyBrujo 16:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split page or sections? 

message: As in, I can download the deletion logs, parse them and get most of the nonsense pages that had been deleted (most times they match '%index.php%', '%/w/%' and '%/wiki/%' SQL patterns). It would be much faster than reviewing the deletion logs through MediaWiki interface for sure. -- ReyBrujo 03:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we need them all?

message: After creating the nonsense-titled pages do the spammers come back to them?  I'd expect they'd just create more such pages.  Probably better to use a DNS blacklist or something, if you're not already. 75.62.7.22 05:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Several are recreated by spambots automatically, like W/index.php. However, the fact is that no article would be created, ever, in that location. -- ReyBrujo 03:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is the purpose of this protection?
Talk:APRODEH

message: It is important to state that APRODEH support politically terrorist organizations in PERU. Recently this organizations sent a letter to European Parliament supporting MRTA terrorist group (Movimiento Revolucionario Tupac Aparu).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baxtereo (talk • contribs) 09:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The above statement is virtually libelous, and should probably be deleted. APRODEH recently sent a fax to the EU saying that the MRTA has not carried out any action in nearly eight years. That's all the fax said. It took no position on the MRTA. --Visitweak (talk) 07:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually you are wrong also, the fax said that Aprodeh condemns both Sendero Luminoso and MRTA. It is on aprodeh.org.pe --ElPeruano (talk) 23:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jíbaro (Peru)

message: I have redirected this page to Jivaroan peoples for two reasons.  First, the article was a mishmash of generic information drawn from an unreliable source and often inaccurate.  Second, we have specific articles on Jivaroan peoples in Pero - the Huambisa and Aguaruna - and we should focus on developing those articles based on real research.  Jivaroan peoples links to both of those articles. Slrubenstein   |  Talk 22:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:1993 Peruvian census

message: I have made a proposal to move the name of this article to Census of Peru 1993, to discuss this please go to Talk:2001 Bangladesh census#Requested move where a full debate is taking place. Any comments or discussion on this page about the proposed move will not be counted. Shatter Resistance (talk) 15:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2001 Bangladesh census which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Summer Olympic coins

message: Hello all,
This article focuses on coins issued by host countries. I know the US issued coins for the 1988 and 1992 games (I have the Olympic half dollar). As we all know, the US didn't host the games then. Should these coins be included? - Thanks, Hoshie 22:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They most definitely should.  If you'd like to add them, please do.  I'd like to overhaul these article with photos, etc. when I have time.  Thanks, Reywas92Talk 22:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olympic coins from non-host nations? 

message: Why there still reads 27 (Projected)? It has been over three since the games ended. No further info anywhere? The current source seems to be a book (or other source) not available in internet. 82.141.73.244 (talk) 20:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese coins from 2008
Talk:2005 Peruvian census

message: I have made a proposal to move the name of this article to Census of Peru, 2005, to discuss this please go to Talk:2001 Bangladesh census#Requested move where a full debate is taking place. Any comments or discussion on this page about the proposed move will not be counted. Shatter Resistance (talk) 15:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2001 Bangladesh census which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress