lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lincoln catafalque

message: Both Jim Bishop and Vincent Bugliosi mention that in 1963, staffers weren't aware that the catafalque had been located in the Capitol basement, and a replica was built for John F. Kennedy's casket. Can anyone provide a source that contradicts this or indicates that the original was substituted for the replica at some point during the weekend? 139.48.25.61 (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The website of the Architect of the Capitol lists John F. Kennedy as having used the Lincoln catafalque. I have reverted your change and added the citation. I will also opin that the catafalque today consists of practically no original material as the black bunting and wood have needed replaced over the last 140 years. Perhaps that is what they meant? --Daysleeper47 (talk) 18:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the bunting has been replaced, however, the original pine material is still there, but now incorporated into a larger platform to support the weight of modern coffins.
I found this quote on a website:
"General Wehle requested that the replica of the Lincoln catafalque, used in 1958 during the ceremonies for the Unknown Soldiers of World War II and the Korean War, be brought from storage at Arlington National Cemetery and set up in the White House."
And then:
"The national color detail, the clergy, the body bearers and casket, and the personal flag bearer turned right, moved in a semicircle, then turned back toward the east entrance to reach the Lincoln catafalque in the center of the hall. The family party also turned right after entering and stopped at a position near the east entrance."
Basically, it appears that a replica catafalque was used for viewing in the White House, and then the original was used for the Lying in State in the Capitol.~ (The Rebel At) ~ 18:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kennedy

message: My question, then, is whether the Unknown Soldiers should be listed on this page? The cites above suggest that a replica was used for those ceremonies rather than the original?139.48.25.61 (talk) 19:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unknown Soldiers

message: In the title of the article and the first image in its lede paragraph, the catafalque is written as the "Lincoln Catafalque", while in the article's lede sentence, it is the "Lincoln catafalque". In order to maintain consistency, I think that the "catafalque" in the phrase "Lincoln catafalque" should be either capitalised across the board or not capitalised. Thoughts? –Matthew - (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation of article title 

message: I've removed Rosa Parks from this reference because although she did "lay in honor", she didn't not "lay in state" and only those that "lay in state" are placed on the Lincoln Catafalque.  See "https://www.aoc.gov/nations-stage/lying-state".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjligocki (talk • contribs) 19:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosa Parks
Talk:Wendy Barrie

message: Several online sources including her IMDB page claim her mother was a Russian Jew called Sarah Cohen and not as stated. The current mother's name in the article is unsourced. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0057412/bio/   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariehkovler (talk • contribs) 13:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother and Jewish background 

message: The article currently states:
she is believed to have inspired his character "Wendy".
This seems unlikely, since Wendy Barrie was born in 1912, and J. M. Barrie wrote "Peter and Wendy" in 1904, eight years before her birth.  Clearly, she cannot have been the inspiration for the fictional character.
Given this strong evidence, I'm removing this (uncited) statement.  86.7.30.217 (talk) 19:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the inspiration for J. M. Barrie's character, Wendy 

message: Why is there no mention of her VERY public liaison with Bugsy Siegel?
She began as his mistress and graduated to being engaged.
She was happy with this so ...?
Hesweeney (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bugsy Siegel
Talk:Capitol Christmas Tree

message: Content added by  has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source, whether the one cited or another (issues have been detected from other sources than those named). Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. --💵Money💵emoji💵💸 15:57, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright cleanup
Talk:Lhermitte's sign

message: I believe this sentence:
:Fluoxetine, given its very long half-life, can be given as a single small dose, and often avoid Lhermitte's sign and other withdrawal symptoms.
is simply confusing.  Is it saying that Fluoxetine can be given to negate Lhermitte's sign, or is it saying that one can avoid the Lhermitte's sign which Fluoxetine can induce by dosing it differently?  The word "avoid" is clearly incorrectly inflected, making the confusion all the more acute. HuskyHuskie (talk) 20:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect and unclear sentence 

message: Well guys, I have a long history of antidepressants use and I perfectly know what SSRI-withdrawal induced brain zaps are. Definitely not what it is described here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.141.189.70 (talk) 09:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's not brain zaps 

message: Adding to the above user's concerns, it does not appear that the electric shock sensations experienced by those discontinuing SSRIs are considered to be related Lhermitte's sign in recent literature. Have not been able to evaluate the reference given as I do not have access at my institution. Reviewing medical literature and correcting as needed may be warranted here.RobertsBiology (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation to SSRI discontinuation symptoms

message: It is called 'Lhermitte's Phenomenon', even the article explains how calling it a sign is incorrect.  Leakedemails (talk) 15:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use correct name in title 

message: Vandalism? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lhermitte%27s_sign&diff=prev&oldid=424767002&diffmode=source Boomshel (talk) 01:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pounding
Talk:Common discography

message: I could be mistaken but TWO THOUSAND UNITS seems abnormally low for a widely distributed and heavily critically acclaimed album. Bay Area artists can sell more out of their trunk in a week than that. I suggest somebody check the #'s. 68.229.184.37 (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resurrection album sales 

message: When did it become known he was doing another albulm?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.233.162 (talk) 02:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Resurrection
Talk:Hood Rich

message: :Image:Big Tymers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Question: On this CD's track entitled #1 (Stunna) Lil Wayne &  Juvenile of Cash Money fame is featured in this song.  Should it be added as well as the track's popular name?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.203.28.21 (talk) 01:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Big Tymers.jpg
Talk:Snodgrass

message: I tried to clean up this section by removing or replacing words or phrases that were POV. I hated to delete information, but with missing citations, POV writing, and use of the word "me", wikification was needed. SINsApple 06:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Snodgrass Clan

message: "The name means "smooth grassy place" in Scottish Gaelic." No, it does not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: The article lists notable people.  The world is full of fine people, who may be on auspicious web sites.  
However, until they have a WP article mentioning them, they aren't considered by WP to be notable.  
Please read Wikipedia:Write the article first.  So, I have removed a few people who fail this criterion.  
Those removed include: 
* Dale Snodgrass, F14 Fighter Pilot, https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-gallery/web12006-2011640jpg
* Donald J Snodgrass, (1940-), Retired US Navy Captain, http://k4qky.com/
* Vera Snodgrass, grade one teacher in the Canadian comic strip The Mice Squad
Trafford09 (talk) 18:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Category talk:Roguelike video games

message: Seeing as it is a console roguelike, should others be included as well? Azure Dreams, Chocobo Dungeon, and Torneko's Dungeon? --141.151.77.152 06:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pokemon Mystery Dungeon

message: ...Epically Azure Dreams. It's an exceptionally version of the genre. 68.163.28.231 07:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I second that motion

message: Realtime, no perma-death, but it had random dungeons. Include or no? 64.238.49.65 (talk) 22:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dark Cloud

message: Should this category really be a subcategory of :Category:Video games with textual graphics? Not everything in this category has textual graphics, including Diablo (video game), Castle of the Winds, and many others. -- Lilwik 07:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video games with textual graphics?
Talk:8:00AM-9:00AM (24 season 6)

message: Synopsis for 7a-8a says 47 dead in Chicago, but 8a-9a starts off mentioning 112 dead in St. Louis. Which is it? --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 13:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are both right.  There have been many, many attacks so far this season.  Also, there is no confirmation that a CTU agent was killed in the firefight at the storage facility, merely that he was shot, and that was most likely in the vest, too. President David Palmer 10:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Louis or Chicago, 47 or 112? 

message: I have rated this article as start class because the relatively short length and lack of sections other than plot and as low importance because individual episode articles are not of high importance to the project as a whole. --Opark 77 15:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment
Talk:HMS Chatham (1788)

message: I found this article in an old newspaper archive online about a brig named the Chatham being shipwrecked (after 1830, so it corresponds with this article's information), and was curious as to whether it's the same Chatham as mentioned in this article. If so, is it worth including in this article? Link: https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/101734584/9711749# RobotSpark (talk) 07:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Sinking?
Talk:The Day of the Lord

message: There are some 450,000 Google hits for "The Day of the Lord", but only 924 for The Day of the Lord plus Gundry. Why then is whole this article about Gundry's interpretation of this term? This is clearly a POV issue and giving undue weight to one source and interpretation. Fram 06:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The comment above, by user Lomos3, refers to an older revision of this page, the contents of which have been completely deleted. The comment was entirely appropriate when it was made: That earlier version of the article was all about Gundry's take on The Day of the Lord. The article was later deleted and "The Day of the Lord" redirected to Rapture. But now, a user MRawlinson has written a page about "The Day of the Lord" as a concept in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament). This is completely distinct from ideas of "Rapture," and the page should now be allowed to remain, rather than being redirected to "Rapture."Prinplup (talk) 22:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment above now obsolete

message: This page should be re-named "Day of the Lord" (without "The"). The existing page, "Day of the Lord," still redirects to "End Times" (not, notice, "Rapture"). I am about to change "Day of the Lord" so that it redirects here. Ultimately, this page should be "Day of the Lord," with "The Day of the Lord" redirecting here. My account does not autoconfirm, so I can't make this change. Prinplup (talk) 02:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming Standards

message: I read a section of this page and it was very dogmatic in explaining the verses and completely violated NPOV --174.45.184.184 (talk) 05:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  VERY Dogmatic Page 

message: :The Hebrew יֹום and Greek ἡμέρα both mean a 24-hour day or an age or epoch. So there are many events prophesied for the Day of the Lord which need to take into account that the Jewish day begins with the sunset so it expects a dark phase () at the beginning of this Age and then the sunrise with The Morning Star followed by the plenty light () of the eternal day.
The penultimate paragraph (above) of the Hebrew Bible usage section appears to be pure original research. It has been wanting a citation for four years, and I propose to delete it in the next several days if no reference is forthcoming. Any other viewpoints? --Ekaterina Colclough (talk) 21:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR paragraph
Talk:Hydrophis belcheri

message: What color is Hydrophis belcheri? Why can I not find any images of it on the Internet and no descriptions of it on the Internet? The two references listed are a magazine article and a CD-ROM? Cannot find them anywhere either.
According to wikipedia, the Hydrophis Belcheri is the poisonous snake in the world. Then why everybody hasn't accepted it yet?Why haven't the others, like animal planet etc. edited their list of poisonous snakes?They still think that Inland Taipan is the poisonous snake in world.So is there anything that we can do to tell them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackhawk y2k316 (talk • contribs) 08:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't is 0.24 μg/kg , not 0.24 mg/kg ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.188.7.198 (talk) 20:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  LD50 

message: This article is way too short and is missing important information on the species, including information on it's venom , taxonomy, and behavior, the latter of which is missing information on the snake's diet, and reproduction. There is also no citations in the article's main body and needs to have proper footnotes added. The infobox also needs to be expanded and images of the species added to the article's infobox and in the article's main body. This is probably the worst article on a major animal species on this site and there is a lot of work that needs to be done to this article with the additions and fixes already listed needing to be done in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's standards and guidelines of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Strange Gateways

message: The article says the Tarbis story is "a collaboration with H. P. Lovecraft", but Lovecraft died 30 years before this collection was published. E. Hoffmann Price#H.P. Lovecraft talks about the two meeting, and about their subsequent correspondence, but not about the circumstances in which this specific collaboration was done. When did the two write it? Was it complete when Lovecraft died, or did price finish (or even start) his part after Lovecraft's death? Was it originally published (e.g. in a magazine) before 1967? -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 19:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "a collaboration with H. P. Lovecraft"
Talk:Donna Deitch

message: Canby's review was so potentially damaging to the success of Desert Hearts that Donna Deitch created flyers promoting the movie to distribute to art house moviegoers, and solicited them to spread the word about the movie after they saw it. Vito Russo wrote in The Celluloid Closet: "In the New York Times, Vincent Canby complained that we are not given enough information about the quality of Vivian's broken marriage, asking if perhaps her lesbianism was a hysterical reaction to her divorce. This is the point at which many heterosexual critics disqualify themselves from perceptively reviewing gay films." (1987 Revised edition, p.215, )
It doesn't make sense to use it as a source supporting the statement in the introductory section: "The film was one of the first film releases to depict a lesbian love story in a generally mainstream, albeit art house, vein but with positive and respectful themes."  I think using the Canby review as a citation should be reconsidered.
There are other citations that can be used instead. I suggest Gene Siskel's as the alternative (see film article's critical response), but there are also other published sources with opinions that weren't as antipathetic as Canby. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I substituted Canby's harsh review citation with Gene Siskel's from the Chicago Tribune. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 09:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Vincent Canby review (New York Times)
Talk:Robert V. Remini

message: Isn't it Robert R Remini? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Augustulus (talk • contribs) 
:No. See here. Plus, I read his book The House. The cover says V. --Daysleeper47 19:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  R 
Talk:Gerry Rogers

message: The body text of this article gave her birth year as 1964, but the category listed 1954 — however, neither date was sourced at all, so I was unable to determine which one is correct. Furthermore, her page in the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives' National Portrait Collection gives her birthdate as 1956. Accordingly, I've removed both birthdates from the article, and would ask that they not be readded until we can locate properly sourced confirmation as to which date is actually correct. Bearcat (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year
Talk:Institut national agronomique Paris Grignon

message: This article is clearly a stub. I'm adding it. --Chaica 06:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ok my mistake,I didn't read the message the first time. --Chaica 06:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Super Multi

message: With Super Multi drives you cannot write:
*DD-CD-R discs
*DD-CD-RW discs
*PD discs
*DVD-RW DL discs
*DVD+RW DL discs
*DVD-R for Authoring discs
They also do not support HD-BURN or GigaRec.
----
What is HD-BURN? Drutt 20:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article also says that DVD-RAM works in these drives. However, I have a 'DVD-Super Multi DL' drive and there is no place for the RAM cartridge. Or isn't the cartridge an essential part of the DVD-RAM? I though that is the way easily recognise RAM of other formats. 85.217.14.225 (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Not all of the formats

message: Super Multi cannot be an informal term and an LG protected term at the same time. --71.158.218.4 (talk) 06:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory info 

message: Any discussion of Multi, Super Multi and DVD Combo optical drives (and whatever else they're marketing these things as) should include explicit language for us non-technophiles.  And given the current popularity of Blu-ray, I think that most people reading these entries want to know if the drive they're looking up can at least play a Blu-ray disc.  And can it play without limiting the capability of the Blu-ray disc itself.  In other words: Given the right screen, will I see all that Blu-ray is capable of offering on this particular optical drive?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.114.61.104 (talk) 14:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, these drives cannot read Blu-ray Discs at all. Urvabara (talk) 09:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be More Explicit - Does it play Blu-Ray or not?
Talk:Spanish Bonk

message: If it's attached to one, that is; I looked up the coordinates on Basemap, and they put me on the northeast slope of Boss Mountain, just south of Hendrix Lake.  There's no official listing for a Spanish Bonk in Basemap, although there is a Spanish Lake and Spanish Creek, north of the west arm of Quesnel Lake.  More precise coordinates may be called for here; I can send you a basemap sample showing the area and any particular closeup (send me an email via the link at left).Skookum1 06:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What mountain is this attached to?
Talk:HP LaserJet 5

message: Do the 5 series use proprietary RAM modules or can some type of standard desktop PC RAM be used? The LaserJet 4, 4M and 4+ use standard non-parity, 72 pin SIMMs *without presence detect*. Presence detect can be removed simply by de-soldering the 'zero ohm resistors' or breaking them off with a pair of pliers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 05:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  For the Laserjet 5 series, the 72-pin SIMMs must also be 32-bit, no parity, with presence detect enabled, and 70ns or slower. HalifaxRage (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: What type of RAM?