lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Overmedication

message: The article confuses acute overdose, intoxication, and prolonged overdose (overmedication), with the result that it's inaccurate and useless. Full rewrite needed.JohnChrysostom (talk) 11:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: APAP

message: It should be made clearer than some interactions of medications are intentional (Drug synergy) by the medical practitioner. A example would be adding a CNS stimulant to a opioid analgesic to offset the effects of sedation and increase effectiveness of pain relief.
The article should be rewritten with verifiable sources. 
Matthewburmeister (talk) 10:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug synergy 

message: The effects section lists unnecessary or useless information about side effects and could scare or give the reader a wrong impression. So i went bold and removed it. Matthewburmeister (talk) 10:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects section 

message: I went looking for sources related to overmedication and found that many google results are focusing on this phenomenom in elderly people. When this article is rewritten, this should be given a substantial section, rather than the current focus, which appears to be pediatric psychotropics. Natureium (talk) 02:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This article does not address many marginalized populations that overmedication affects, especially seniors. This section should be just as important as the paediatrics section, as seniors are not prioritized as much when talking about topics like this.Sahrishmasood (talk) 23:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elderly
Talk:William W. Destler

message: Hey all, not sure how we're going to include his LP into the wikipedia. The only source I can find is the Amazon page. It's definitely him though, the voice is unmistakable. http://www.amazon.com/September-Miniature-Korea-Pink-Music/dp/B002QAV1BE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1263396630&sr=8-1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.21.64.37 (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folk LP in 1973 
Talk:Sermey Khensur Lobsang Tharchin

message: Mostly relates to use of hyperbole throughout.  If some of these can be quoted and attributed to a source, that would help. Mary*wu (talk) 15:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It turns out that everything except the first paragraph was copy/pasted from here, I've replaced it with a link and made the remaining sentence NPOV. GlassFET 15:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality tag
Talk:Pallor mortis

message: In the following sentence, is the word "the" needed at the end?
The blood sinks down into the lower parts of the body creating the livor mortis.
It seems odd, but perhaps this is a medical usage, so I left it. Wakablogger2 (talk) 17:37, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article not needed? 

message: This stub is virtually a word-for-word cut/paste of the AT Schafer abstract.  Looks like a copyright violation to me. BabelBoy (talk) 19:12, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
Talk:Palmer College of Chiropractic

message: I am a UW-Eau Claire student working on a English class project to contribute to a Wikipedia article.  I think I was supposed to comment on this page (the talk page) for feedback from other users before I actually did my changes on this page - so I think I am posting this late.  For my project, I noticed that on the Palmer College of Chiropractic page a user on June 2013 wrote on the page that this article needs to fix the introduction because it is too long for overall article length and relies too much on resources to primary sources- this page contains an exclamation point on page.  Based on the comments from the user on June 2013, I made the introduction shorter by formatting the information, already on the page, differently.  I added a history section where I copied information from the introduction and pasted it to this section.  I also made another new section titled Palmer College of Chiropractic campuses.  Again, I copied information from the introduction and pasted it to this new section.  I also made the campus sections (titled Davenport campus, Florida campus, and West campus) as subsections of Palmer College of Chiropractic campuses section.  This made the introduction shorter.
I also noticed that on this page there is a need, in my opinion, to get rid of “who is known by [whom?]".  Another minor edit I made was getting rid of "who is known by [whom?]" to "who is..." that way the problem of known by whom? disappears. ZsoftballZ20 (talk) 21:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganizing and editing the article 

message: I am a UW-Eau Claire student working on a English class project to contribute to a Wikipedia article.  I would like feedback on adding a section of Palmer College of Chiropractic's mission statement, accreditation section, athletic section, and Clinic section.ZsoftballZ20 (talk) 01:47, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding New Sections
Talk:Paracelsianism

message: I removed these from further reading as this is English wikipedia, but there's no reason these can't be used as historical sources, so I'm putting them here for future use. Skyerise (talk) 17:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Skyerise! I strongly disagree with moving these sources to the talk page. Many readers of the English Wikipedia know other languages, and a significant portion of them actually has one of these other languages as a mother language. Listing non-English sources can be extremely helpful to those readers who know these languages, and there is no good reason to remove them from view. If there's one thing for which Wikipedia is actually reliable and which renders it useful for research purposes, it's bibliographical listings like these. I therefore restored the sources to the article. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 18:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential foreign language sources
Talk:Paradoxical embolism

message: I don't have time to do this in full right now - but this article is (fair enough, it's only supposed to be a stub) certainly in need of revision, since it could be quite misleading (at least to a layman) from a medical point of view.
What should change:
- A paradoxical embolism simply describes a scenario in which an embolus crosses over from the right side of the heart to the left atrium, and then impacts somewhere in the systemic circulation. While it can wind up in the carotid (and beyond), it's not specifically stroke or CVA related.
- I've removed the line "Because of the risk of stroke from paradoxical embolism, it is usually recommended that even small atrial septal defects be repaired." This is highly misleading, since it seems to forget that should an embolus *not* cross over to the left side, it will invariably enter the main pulmonary artery, and if it's not very small, cause catastrophic (and often instantly fatal, in spite of any emergency treatment) PE.
Similarly "The lungs act as a filter to prevent the clots from entering the arterial circulation" again seems to suggest that pulmonary embolism is somehow a 'normal' process, as opposed to a medical emergency - and one of the leading causes of sudden death in all age groups.
:Thank you for removing the line about repairing the misinformation about ASD. It is usually NOT recommended that small ASDs be repaired. --Gccwang (talk) 20:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading text 

message: doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005462 might be quite helpful for expansion. JFW | T@lk 20:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary source 

message: "Cryptogenic stroke" should redirect here.  Assistance requested.  --108.178.113.114 (talk) 22:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-direct request 

message: Hello all, 
This topic was listed as a stub and for part of my medical school education I spent some time altering and adding to the article to make it more complete. Open to feed back and changes as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterbeck22 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MEDU 9330 - Expanded WikiProject Medicine
Talk:Kobe Collection

message: It is difficult to explain one's culture,especially the case of explaining to another country people,because it is difficult to find articles by other languages.
I don't find English evidence of the articles,but in japanese,I think these are references of them.
http://www2.explore.ne.jp/feature/kobe.html
http://www.tv-tokyo.co.jp/wbs/2001/05/08/news_day/n5.html
http://f32.aaa.livedoor.jp/~extract/museum/
http://www.kobe-np.co.jp/rensai/kobe/kobe6.htm
http://www.nightscape.info/west/index.htm
I think these references show that,
*It is seemed there is peculiar fashion style in Kobe in Japan. (it is recognized by many japanese.) 
* Many magazines for young women show airticles of this fashion style. 
* "Kobe Collection" is held by background ,as commercial. 
* At the same time,this event supported many associations (company,government,foreign country...). To tell the truth,it is the largest fashion event in Japan. (term,number of associations and number of the sites),but I can't get evidences.)
* "Kobe fashion(Style)" has fostered by the lifestyle of people that manage trading company and banks from the last of 19th century,has been effect the location of Kobe port that was one of the largest international port.So it recognized that this fashion is peculiar style in japan.
Please refer this,altogether.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kobe
galuboo 01:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gravidity and parity

message: I don't know if it helps anyone else, but my experience in higher education studies of biology and science were helped tremendously by tying together like or similar processes as they  repeat themselves in circles of a cycle. I felt my understanding didn't jump the gap until these overlooked signs were pointed out to me. I would like to see connection mentioned between obstetric number record of Mothers and the orbital notation record of Atoms, as they are the same cycles, just not commonly recognized due to each cycle being the same but of seemingly different circles. It was important to my understanding of recognizing Truth of a larger picture. - Dirtclustit (talk) 08:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parity illustration 

message: This article does a bad job of explaining why these terms exist and are used.
For example, casual googlin reveals that:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878019/
It feels very relevant to not just explain, for example, that "primagravida" means "a woman who is pregnant for the first time or has been pregnant one time" but why this distinction even exist. Why invent a specific term and not just go para 0, para 1, para 2, para 3 and so on. (Presumably because there are certain risks and conditions that are more common among women that has never given birth before).
CapnZapp (talk) 13:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason behind terms 

message: Since sex and gender are very different things, the terms "female" and "woman" are also very different.
Reliable sources prove that pre-operative trans men, non-binary people and intersex people can also get pregnant and give birth, if they have female gonads including at least the following gonads and genitalia:
*a uterus
*fallopian tubes
*a vagina
*a cervix.
However, intersex people are not females, since they cannot be assigned a definitive sex at birth, meaning that their sex is ambiguous. Intersex people are not enitrely male or entirely female; every intersex person's sex falls on a random point on the spectrum of sex. — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 16:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Female" is a more accurate term than "woman" because sex and gender are very different
Talk:Les Pages Jèrriaises

message: Les Pages Jèrriaises is probably the most notable Norman language site on the web, and is almost certainly the most notable Jèrriais language website.  It is the first Norman site that comes up on a Google search for Jèrriais, and the first site after the Norman Wikipedia that comes up on a search for Nouormand.  I'll add more details in the article, itself.  The Jade Knight 01:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a reason for having the web site listed in a "further reading" section in Jèrriais, not a reason for having a separate article about the web site itself.  Please read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (web). Uncle G 17:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read WP:N, thanks.  It's important to remember that while the Pages Jèrriaises have had a significant impact in the Norman (Jèrriais) community, Jèrriais speakership is extremely limited—there are about as many native speakers of the language as there are pages on Les Pages Jèrriaises.  The Jade Knight 21:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The references, which we cannot read, may not be third-party sources, given that the creator of Les Pages Jèrriaises also works for the sources, i.e. Jersey Evening Post. I'd suggest that this article should be merged with another related article, unless someone can come up with improved sources. Danrok (talk) 02:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Avi Wigderson

message: The following dates reflect this scholar's time in School of Mathematics at the Institute for Advanced Study:
*1995–96 academic year: Member 
*fall of 1997: Member
*9/1998–10/1998: Visitor
*7/1999–present: Faculty 
IAScomms1930 (talk) 20:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: no sources and we are not here to promote the Institute for Advanced Studies for you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Edits to "Biography" Section
Talk:Penis transplantation

message: With this being on the front page, I would protect this article ASAP, otherwise this article is going to be exploding with vandalism. In fact, I'm surprised that wasn't done in foresight. JanderVK (talk) 21:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Preemptive protection or semi-protection is almost never done. Articles are only protected if there has been considerable, targeted vandalism.-RHM22 (talk) 23:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I find that highly ridiculous, considering the high rate of vandalism on such pages, but I guess that's something to bring up elsewhere. How many revisions due to vandalism were done today? JanderVK (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the page has now been semi-protected. We don't protect pages preemptively (generally) because it goes against the policy of 'anyone can edit.' We only do it in response to vandalism.-RHM22 (talk) 05:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article protection 

message: Surely the famous case of John and Lorena Bobbitt should be included in this article as well; it was much longer ago than these two cases, though not nearly so successful. Shocking Blue (talk) 10:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Wayne Bobbitt 

message: Both the Chinese and South Africans are claiming the first successful transplant. We should probably explain the conflict. Right now the article says both were first, which is a contradiction. The Chinese claim is for "a surgical success". Kendall-K1 (talk) 20:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First successful
Talk:Pentalogy of Cantrell

message: If someone gets around to writing more than a stub, this may be useful.
*Johannesburg - Doctors were delighted on Sunday after successfully completing surgery on nine-day-old baby Ashleigh Louw, who was born with part of her heart outside her chest. Surgeons managed to close the internal abdominal wall and put the heart back in her chest, Dr Jerome Loveland, head of paediatric surgery at Chris Hani-Baragwanath Hospital in Johannesburg told journalists.Craigallan.za (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly she died . FFMG (talk) 12:02, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography

message: PTHC redirects to this article. "PTHC" is also a term which refers to a type of child pornography: "pre-teen hardcore".
Wiki discussion/links:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Poweriron
** PTHC (pornography) - deleted due to "non-notable bald dictionary definition"
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography/Deletion/2013
** "PTHC (pornography) (via WP:PROD on 2 November 2013) Speedily deleted"
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lolicon/Archive_10
** Mentions that "pthc" and "raygold" are child porn-related search terms.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Child_pornography/Archive_3
** 'Would this so-called keyword have been "PTHC"? Or "Ray Gold"?'
** Mentions the term's inclusion in the child pornography article I think
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pthc&type=revision&diff=157181138&oldid=134176452
** Pthc never redirected to child pornography, but it was discussed that it should. "ambiguity link for pthc" --Talk:Child_pornography/Archive_3#Redirecting_Pthc
References:
* http://www.jsonline.com/news/29361424.html
** 'In the parlance of child pornographers, PTHC stands for "pre-teen hard core," according to an affidavit accompanying the search warrant request'
* https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jack-m-7a2a3a122_a-former-bbc-producer-has-been-found-guilty-activity-6877962629730635776-yWrp - same story as described by www.dailymail.co.uk below
** "arrested by NCA officers at his Kensington flat in October 2018"
** "Analysis showed that the keywords he used to search for the material included “PTHC” (Pre Teen Hard Core), “Preteen” and “11 yo”."
* https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10322185/Retired-BBC-Panorama-director-guilty-possessing-child-abuse-images.html - PUBLISHED: 14:34 EST, 17 December 2021 | UPDATED: 14:34 EST, 17 December 2021
** "Jurors were told how peer to peer (P2P) technology, which facilitates file sharing, was used to download the content.[...]An officer searched for the term ‘PTHC’, which stands for ‘pre-teen hard core’, and found more than 40 items. Other file names were read out in court: ‘Preteen young’, ‘underage sex’, ‘pedo’."
"PTHC" has been called a search term. The term is related to pedophiles and pedophilia. It might also have been used to mean "preteen hurtcore", but I have no proof of that. --User123o987name (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect info
Talk:Period prevalence

message: I removed the following text:
This does not seem to be related to the text of the article, and I don't believe it's accurate. GAdam (talk) 03:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not entirely accurate (you could have a rate that refers to something other than time:  price per person, miles per gallon, etc.), but even if it were entirely accurate, it doesn't belong in this article.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I
Talk:Personal Health Information Protection Act

message: I have merged this article with PIPEDA since the two acts are "substantially similar". Any new content should be placed in this Act's subsection of that article. twirligigLeave one! ⋄ Check me out! 18:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've accepted a new draft with vastly expanded coverage - blowing up the PIPEDA section to this extent would unbalance that article. Huon (talk) 04:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I work in medical software, developing EMRs, and have never heard it pronounced "pee-hip-ah", only "fippa".
Bytor (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: same Legend of 14 (talk) 00:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Are there any plans to create articles that the broken links will lead to? Otherwise they should be removed. Legend of 14 (talk) 01:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links
Talk:Pest house

message: There is an old pest house in Nayland, in Suffolk, address:
Old Pest House, Gravel Hill, Nayland, Colchester, Suffolk CO6 4JB  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABickersteth (talk • contribs) 16:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pest Houses in the UK 

message: A history section would be useful regarding when the term was used. 
Our town's historical societies provide examples of slight changes to how it was refered to as:
In 1800, a town meeting stated "the Inoculation for the small pox and building a house for that purpose". 
Only a few years later a 1838 history calls it a small pox hospital. 
But this is original research from one small place and would be need to be expanded with more citations. Colonial Computer 19:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  history
Talk:Phantosmia

message: I don't know how to edit but this page has a number of errors.  Oxymetazoline HCl (for example, Afrin) does not block the nasal passages, it opens them.  Also cocaine is not effective long term treatment and the cited passage is from 1966.  https://academic.oup.com/chemse/article/38/9/803/307539  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.106.201.142 (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Phenoperidine

message: this is bugging me.  hard information to find.  The article should say... still looking. Jytdog (talk) 06:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this drug on the market anywhere? 

message: Jytdog,
I noticed the changes you made to the phenoperidine page. I am a new Wikipedia user that wanted to improve a stub article. Is there any advice you can offer concerning the way I had created the page that resulted in your changes? In terms of content, layout, sources, etc. ? I really appreciate your suggestions.
Thank you, Java76 Java76 (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for asking Java76!  each of my edits has an edit note explaining it.  if there is any one of them that is not clear, please ask! Thanks. (in case you don't know, the article page has a "view history" tab, and if you click on that, you will see all the changes with their edit notes, and you can also select any two versions and compare them (including two adjacent versions).  You can also link to any such comparison.  here is the first change I made.  if you look at the page, you can see my edit note, and the changes I made below.  and you can click "next edit" and go to the next one, etc etc).  We call the link showing the changes (like the one above under "here") a "diff", and if you provide a link to a diff, and write something like "your edit note said X but I don't understand the problem - can you please explain more?"  or something like that, i would be happy to answer) Jytdog (talk) 20:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Changes
Talk:Nara Park

message: This is an evidence,but it is Japanese.
http://www.sekaiisan.info/kasugayama/
http://www.nhk.or.jp/sawayaka/narakasugayama.html
galuboo 01:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm try to explain about a primeval forest.

message: What's the name of the street connecting Nara Park and Nara Station? 2.25.134.149 (talk) 10:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Street?
Talk:Pittsburgh compound B

message: It says "currently it is the most used" with a 2004 ref - but Florbetapir (18F) was approved in 2011. Article should say to what extent PiB is still used since say 2012 ? Perhaps it is still widely used because/if it is cheaper than Florbetapir (18F) ? - Rod57 (talk) 05:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it still the most used