lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bavand dynasty

message: Why you want it linking to a disambig? The only one that applies is warrior in my mind. What are you reasons for the disambig? TecTec 19:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warriors 

message: I have added a significant amount to this, as well as some sources, so I will remove both the "stub" notice and the "cites no sources" notice. I will also start writing about the other minor dynasties of the Caspian region including the Paduspanis, Dabuyhids, Karenids, and the Salarids. Please help and assist as you can.--Khodadad (talk) 07:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Per  Iranica, ĀL-E BĀVAND --"From ca. 635/1238 to 750/1349. The dynasty was restored three decades later by a side line of the family. The rulers of this branch were vassals of the Il-khans. Although they retained the title of kings of Māzandarān, their power and territories were much more restricted than under the Saljuqs. The capital was moved from Sārī to Āmol, which was less affected by the ravages of the Mongol invasions." Amol did not become their capital until 1238. --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital Amol 

message: the spelling of bavand is not correct, this word is pronounced Pavand/Pavandian.
Pa Vand in Mazandarani language means someone who ties something to his feet Chamroshduty (talk) 19:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Chamroshduty, please read my various edit summaries, including my reply you to here  --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

text: It doesn't matter how the word is spelled in Arabic, Persian etc. The only important spelling is the English one, and that's Bavand (or sometimes Bawand even). In other words, while it may be spelled as 'Pavand' in Persian, it is spelled as 'Bavand' in English. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bavand?
Talk:Amoco Cadiz

message: ----
The Freshies recorded at least two versions of a song about the spill, "Amoco Cadiz", on their EP "The Men From Banana Island..." and LP "The Girls from Banana Island...." Asat 09:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

message: What exactly is the Lloyd's Open Form thing about? This article doesn't really explain it, and neither does the LOF article, which doesn't seem relevant to this situation.
184.76.26.102 (talk) 00:22, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lloyd's open Form
Talk:Colebrooke River

message: Was the Colebrooke River really once known as the Great Maguire river?  It's not very wide or deep. Schomberg 09:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comments
Talk:National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory

message: *WE need rebuild this page, Any Good Ideas about sections to have in this page? Max 09:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: THis page is a Copy and Past

message: The history of the lab is perfunctory and not quite correct.
1963 was the establishment of the MSU Cyclotron Laboratory.  The lab was renamed the NSCL when NSF awarded a grant to replace the K50 cyclotron with a newly constructed K500 and later K1200 which were later coupled.  I don't recall the year that NSCL was renamed, though Sam A. should.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.58.63 (talk) 17:20, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Hi, just stumbled in here ... how does this compare with the Large Hadron Collider being completed in Europe at the moment?  Also, shouldn't the intro to this article refer back to the article on Particle Accelarators?  I've put the link in to Cyclotron LookingGlass (talk) 06:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also asked for a citation for the claim that this is the largest of its kind in the world.  The article here on Particle accelerators does not appear to agree with the statement here. LookingGlass (talk) 06:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparisons ?
Talk:Tenancy deposit scheme (England and Wales)

message: I have removed the line below from the article as it is not relevant to the Tenancy Deposit Scheme and appears only to have been added so that an external link to a commercial company could be included.
Landlords do not have to take deposits and a viable alternative is to use the Tenant Guarantee Scheme.Cameronjamesburns 09:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed line
Wikipedia talk:Protected titles/Historical list of titles/April 2007

message: A.C.M. should be redir'd to ACM and protected (or probably just semi-protected) from alteration. I'm really surprised it isn't already going there. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 09:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A.C.M.

message: 
One page listed here actually exists, as a redirect. Is it meant to be on here? – Gurch 10:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. 'Twas deleted, placed here, then restored by another admin. The page has been protected instead. Resurgent insurgent 17:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I've removed Aimee Allen, but I'm not positive about Metal Sludge.  Opinions? —METS501 (talk) 22:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article has existed now for over four months and would probably have to go through Articles for deletion if it was to be deleted. Since this page is only intended to prevent recreation of articles that we definitely don't want, it probably doesn't belong on here. If the article is at some point listed for deletion, deleted and then persistently re-created, it might be necessary to add it back, but that's clearly not the case at the moment. Thanks -- 86.149.9.123 16:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 21:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pages that exist
Talk:Museum of the Earth

message: This page has clearly been written by a PR/marketing person or just copied from their website. I've cleaned up most of it but there is still things left to do. I encourage others to contribute to this effort! I'm sure it is a lovely museum and people should go and visit it, but this isn't the place for encouraging people to do that... Ooooooooo 09:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issue

message: In fact, yes, it is basically the museum's website pasted into the page and reformatted! Ooooooooo 09:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from website
Template talk:User ucm

message: I made the format for this userbox consistent with the other UCs'.  Hopefully someone -- someday -- might even actually use the thing.  Does anyone know what their official identity palette specifies as the school's colors (i.e., what precise, pantone or HTML-formatted shades of blue and gold/yellow/orange)?  I can't find a goddamn thing on their website.  --Dynaflow 09:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors
Talk:Development (differential geometry)

message: Just to get some clarity about the purpose of this page, what would you suggest as the optimal route to Cartan developments of curves?  Something like developments of curves in affine connection (which is clearly the linchpin of the whole Cartan connection treatment) -> Cartan connection (with various intermediate steps, such as projective connection and conformal connection as those pages mature). Silly rabbit 02:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartan developments 
Talk:Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B

message: There were (I think) 3.5 name changes in the journal's history. These ought to be listed. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 22:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming history
Talk:Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A

message: What justification is there for the article listing the ISO 4 abbreviation as "Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A"? This does seem to be an abbreviation that the journal itself uses, but not the ISO 4 abbreviation. (Perhaps the question, then, becomes what justification is there for the Royal Society using it?)
Consulting the ISO 4 List of Title Word Abbreviations, "Philosophical", for example, should be abbreviated "Philos." (not "Phil."). The US NLM lists the ISO abbreviation for "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. A" as  "Philos Trans R Soc Lond A". By this logic (and by the LTWA above) "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A" should be "Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A" (assuming that 'R' is right for Royal. I've trouble finding it in the LTWA).
The article for Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B gives its ISO Abbreviation as "Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B" greymullet (talk) 11:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISO Abbreviation
Talk:Temporal parts

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 07:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: I would like something more on the relationship between temporal parts and events. Who identitfied perduring objects with events? And maybe some reference to why perduring objects are not events and why it is wrong to identify objects with events.
--RickardV 10:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it got moved into its own section at some point. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the relation of temporal parts and events 

message: This should either be relocated to the section on perdurantism, or alternatively put into a section on its own. Ideally, one would imagine this page should entirely be about what temporal parts are, as opposed to arguments for their existence (i.e. arguments that perdurantism is true).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.7.108 (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it got moved into its own section at some point. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary Intrinsics
Talk:How We Used to Live

message: The lovely Ms Whalley, the most famous actor to appear is missing from this article. Cheers, Vera, Chuck & Dave (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Joanne Whalley]] is missing

message: "When ITV Schools moved to Channel 4 and S4C in the Autumn of 1987, the series was shown in the main schools." Not sure if the sentence was cut-off, but it doesn't make much sense. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 23:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear sentence
Talk:LoadRunner

message: What is the latest LoadRunner version
11.5 is the latest version, And till now 5 new patches have been released.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.197.253.62 (talk) 07:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: Extensive research was completed on this article.  Numerous references now are included and the information has been updated.  JLRedperson (talk) 22:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extensive edits, references and corrections made to article 

message: Just wondering .. if it were a product from a smaller or unknown company , an article written in a similar fashion would be called an advertisement .
and marked for speedy deletion .. Not that i want this article to be deleted nor do I consider this written like an ad , but I cant help and wonder what separates this from other similar articles .
Leningrad (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 11:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does not make this article an advertisement ? 

message: As the HP Software division was sold to MicroFocus, the program is no longer called HP LoadRunner, should the article be renamed?
AlexLehm (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer *HP* LoadRunner 
Talk:The Doberman Gang

message: :Image:130970.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:130970.jpg

message: Where's the soundtrack? GalaxyGirlz (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music album
Talk:National Centre for Infectious Diseases

message: Parking here for future integration into the article:
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/ncid-national-centre-for-infectious-diseases-singapore-11882690
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/wuhan-virus-pneumonia-national-centre-infectious-diseases-12297584
robertsky (talk) 07:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources from opening until wuhan virus
Talk:International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management

message: This article reads like an advertisement, and currently resembles a candidate for deletion per WP:SPAM - Tiswas(t/c) 10:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It asserts importance and isn't unquestionably non-notable, so it doesn't fall under WP:CSD A7. Try WP:AfD. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement
Talk:Odori ebi

message: I have changed the kanji to reflect actuall Japanese language usage found on google and deleted the unneeded "ruby" text. The last term, I should note, was completely wrong. (Possible, yes, but unused, and therefore, wrong.) I have also taken out the "wikitionary" links, for the moment. It made editing it all confusing,  and I'm not really sure how "standard" that is anyway. Someone who knows better than I do, please put it back if needed. To me, it seems sort of unneccesary for the average user, anyone interested in finding out the Japanese terms should be able to find it themselves easily enough. 
I personally question some of the info here, but I really can't say because I know so little on the topic.
Liashi 11:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article accuracy 

message: Hello, I’m Japanese wikipedian. Recently this article was translated to Japanese, and I (and a few Japanese wikipedians) had doubt about the subject of this article. We don't know Odori-ebi, and there are NO Japanese sources refer to "踊り海老(odori-ebi)".  Other English site we searched says that Odori-ebi is a raw shrimp sushi, not using sake, it dosen't match this article.  Therefore, I wonder this source (and this article) is accurate or not. Please tell us credibility of the source about Odori-ebi. I apologies my poor English. Capsellanaut (talk) 14:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  doubt about credibility of this article from the point of view of Japanese
Talk:Baz Luhrmann's Australia (film)

message: Thanks for uploading :Image:100 2050.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
* Wikipedia:Image use policy
* Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: License tagging for Image:100 2050.JPG

message: Please try not to use all caps in an article. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 04:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caps 

message: This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.  · AndonicO Talk 11:00, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your edit to [[HD DVD]]. 

message: A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charters Towers Miners, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy).  You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Charters Towers Miners.  Fabrictramp (talk) 16:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Charters Towers Miners

message: #  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.  AntHolnes (talk) 03:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2008
Talk:Bristol Aztecs

message: I put the historic results in a proper table (as per the London Blitz article), which I hope will be done on all the BAFL team articles, at least the Premier division ones.
I also added the logo to the article under WP:LOGO.
I think as the popularity of the sport increases, more information will become available. Man from the Ministry 02:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some additions. 
Talk:Marazan

message: I have given verbatim quotations of the 'Author's Note' printed in this book. I think that this qualifies as Fair use, since a) the aim is non-profit education - informing Wikipedia readers; b) the value of these is that they give the author's own comments on the books, in his own words - something that cannot be achieved by any paraphrasing; c) the amount is insubstantial - a single introductory page that isn't part of the work itself; and d) if there is any effect at all upon the potential market for the copyright works, it must surely be positive - increasing interest in the work. Nevertheless, I'm a novice here; comment upon whether my view is justified or not would be most welcome.
Roger.beaumont 11:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:So Disdained

message: I have given verbatim quotations of the 'Author's Note' printed in this book. I think that this qualifies as Fair use, since a) the aim is non-profit education - informing Wikipedia readers; b) the value of these is that they give the author's own comments on the books, in his own words - something that cannot be achieved by any paraphrasing; c) the amount is insubstantial - a single introductory page that isn't part of the work itself; and d) if there is any effect at all upon the potential market for the copyright works, it must surely be positive - increasing interest in the work. Nevertheless, I'm a novice here; comment upon whether my view is justified or not would be most welcome.
Roger.beaumont 11:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo/Archive 1

message: Did Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo have its own flag and emblem? --Camptown 11:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Only republics of SFRY had flags and emblems, but not autonomous provinces. PANONIAN (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag of SAR Kosovo 

message: The name of the souther province in Socialist Serbia was Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija.
Kosovo is just one part of it, and Metohija is another. There was no political division between two of them, just geographical.
Even in present Serbia, official name for province is also Kosovo and Metohija.
But, in UN documents after 1999, someone pushed name Kosovo, so it is now international.
Anyway, I do not think that we can go in history and change all the names.
--Iricigor 18:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Before 1974, it was Kosovo and Metohija, but in 1974 it was changed to just Kosovo (and changed back later). Nikola 03:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  S.A.P. Kosova (and Metohija) 

message: Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija (1946–1974) basically describe the same thing. It's not really clear why the naming or constitutional difference should be used as a delimiter for article names, we didn't do that in case of the Yugoslav republics. The Vojvodina history articles are split in 1963, not 1974, and that also seems arbitrary. The common article name could be something simple and descriptive, such as Kosovo in SFR Yugoslavia. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes; we seem to have a lot of different overlapping modern-history articles. (And even more articles which include a selective history of Kosovo, often starting in 1913). bobrayner (talk) 02:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agree that the three article on SFRY Kosovo history need merging, and that into Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo, I disagree that we should do away with the Kosova article, since, so far as I understand, that's an article about a real-life unrecognized entity. The subject of Kosovar history in the FR Yugoslavia, imo, clearly needs to be covered in Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija, so far as that article exists. -- Director (talk) 08:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Lists of NFL team seasons

message: http://www.profootballhof.com/assets/history/Copy%20of%20W-L%20-%20Start%20of%202009_Final.pdf
Here's an updated list. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 04:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This doesn't list the seasons, but rather the all-time records of NFL teams.  Also, separate issue, should be a sortable list.  Leobold111 (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 
Talk:Isaac Kobina Abban

message: --Natsubee 11:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nissan Livina

message: i think the title of this page should be "Nissan Livina."
Because AFAIK Nissan Indonesia has announced two Livina variants (5-seater Nissan Livina and 7-seater Nissan Grand Livina) on April 2007.
and it would be hard to add those infos under this title... :)
andry 11:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nissan Livina