Talk:Hurricane Jeanne

message: Took them til J, but it looks like we might finally have a storm that can threaten me. (Charlotte, NC) --Golbez 21:52, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)
:Look at that. Ten days later, and how right am I? Look at the 5am Sept 26 map, and the line goes right through Charlotte. Damn, I'm good. (the little zigzag in the NC/SC border) --Golbez 09:27, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)
:: Hah, just wait another 12 hours ;-) This storm has its own mind Awolf002 09:37, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here we go 

message: I grabbed the Melbourne radar image from Jeanne's landfall. Oddly enough, I had the one from Frances lying around. The similarities are scary. I'll see if I can find a place to put them so I can have an excuse to upload them for comparisons. -- Cyrius|✎ 07:18, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is about a 5 mi difference in landfall. Looks like twins, but for the speed. Awolf002 08:39, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oddness 

message: The map of Jeanne's predicted path needs to be updated. The caption states Sep. 26, but the image is from Sep 23. The new map is on www.noaa.gov. I would do it myself, but I'm not sure how to edit picture yet. 131.247.46.203 23:16, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You're seeing a cached version, the image has been updated quite a few times since the 23rd. -- Cyrius|✎ 23:32, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: Well, that was fun. Unfortunately, the history for the article seems to have been wiped by all the moving. Is it possible to restore? --Golbez 18:33, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)
:It should be now. --mav 19:16, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving

message: One big problem with this article is lack of references. Jdorje 07:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Storm history is good but no preparations and short on impact, considering the intensity. Downgraded to Start. CrazyC83 06:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it had more references, we might think of B class.  Thegreatdr 18:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs more info in general. There's nothing on preps or aftermath. The United States section is only two paragraphs - far too short for a 7 billion dollar storm. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found some digital photos I took back in 2004 and uploaded them to WikiCommons.  Good thing they  are dated files, otherwise I would not be able to tell the difference in which hurricane the photos belong to! (Resident of Daytona Beach, Florida - Survivor of Hurricane Charley, Frances, Jeanne...) Gamweb 17:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo 

message: *Miami, FL report
*Melbourne, FL report
*Tampa Bay, FL report
*Peachtree City, GA report
*Charleston, SC report
*Greenville-Spartanburg, SC report
*Morehead City, NC report (on tornadoes)
*Raleigh, NC report
*Mount Holly, NJ report
*State College, PA report
*Upton, NY report
*Binghamton, NY report
These should be included in the article. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NWS reports 

message: I can see several issues right off that keep this below GA.For one,I don't think that video at the end is really necessary,and if it does have a place here,it is really placed in a haphazard manner on the page anyway.We've got a major need for citations,and the Impacts section needs expanded greatly.I'm gonna get to it.TheNobleSith (talk) 00:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are doing very well for a new member. :) You remebered to sign your username, and you can tell the primary issues with the article. And yes, that video is a bit obnoxious in the current manner. Juliancolton (Talk) 00:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Try making the video an external link at the end of the article.  That's usually how it's handled within the project anyway. Thegreatdr (talk) 00:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, ok. Thanks. I forgot about that. Juliancolton (Talk) 00:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

text: That makes mistakes sometimes. Juliancolton (Talk) 01:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

text: User:Hurricanehink left a comment on your talk page, so that might come in useful. Juliancolton (Talk) 01:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I filled out most of the references and cleaned up some of the wording within the article, per current GA criteria.  The article still needs more information before GANing can occur.  Thegreatdr (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gonna Give It A Go 

message: Ok,I've cleaned this thing up a bit tonight,but I'm not personally going to touch the Florida Impact section until we decided whether or not to create a seperate article for it.I believe we should,since there's enough notable info about that topic to put into a full sized article.TheNobleSith (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florida