lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Muezza

message: I have been searching for Hadith that state the facts mentioned in this page, but they do not seem to exist. However this story seems to be accepted as legitimate, if a search is carried out on Google, there will be many sites that support it. In this case, what websites would be deemed as legitimate enough to be quoted as a citation? M2k41 22:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide citations as per WP:V. Citations should be from respectable sources, historians etc., and not from a website which doesn't provide a source for it. --Ragib 01:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at any of the books in this Google search. You're mistaken if you think this story is limited to the Internet. - Nunh-huh 19:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Shouldn't the article's title be Mu'izza? This is the standard transliteration of Arabic ﻣﻮﻴﺰا.  
-Al-Bargit 20:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transcription

message: I have decided to remove the line "It is also believed that when Muhammad would give sermons within his household he would often hold Muezza in his lap " I originally put this in, but myself and others have not been able to find a source.M2k41 (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of unsourced text

message: "The most famous story about Muezza recounts how the call to prayer was given, and as Muhammad went to put on one of his robes, he found his cat sleeping on one of the sleeves, and instead of disturbing the cat he cut off the sleeve and let him sleep." uses http://www.muslimheritage.com/topics/default.cfm?TaxonomyTypeID=105&TaxonomySubTypeID=144&TaxonomyThirdLevelID=-1&ArticleID=686 as its source - but that article uses this Wikipedia article as its source for this story! Шизомби (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recursive citing 

message: I wonder if it's okay to have a picture of Muhammad's cat...—Chowbok ☠ 23:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 

message: The Arabic letter م is quite different, so I wonder where this comes from, or if it has anything to do with Muslims at all... AnonMoos (talk) 08:17, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded; this makes the speculation about Abyssinian cats even more absurd, and sounds like western diaspora invented Islamic folklore. --xensyriaT 15:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "M" pattern

message: Combined, I think these two articles would have enough content for a decent sized article. The content is related. Smasongarrison (talk) 00:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Islam and cats]]
Talk:Pascal's Flaw

message: This seems to be a peculiar entry since "Pascal's Flaw" is not a recognized fallacy category in any logic book that I know.  
In fact, the name itself seems to involve a fallacy since it assumes that there is a readily identifiable flaw committed by Pascal and implies that he is somehow noteworthy in committing it.  This is at least debatable.  (What other fallacies are named after persons?)
It would be a very good idea to drop this entry and incorporate any content of value into the article on the Wager.
: Interesting, I was just experimenting with redirecting this page to the right section in the article, but I think maybe even this redirect should be deleted. I have not seen this usage anywhere, except internet forums where people cite this wikipedia entry! :) --Merzul 18:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pascal's Flaw is another name for a specific case of circular definition.  It is not a fallacy category, but it is a fallacy.  That is why Pascal indeed commited a flaw; and he is indeed noteworthy because he proposed it, apparently seriously, despite its fairly obvious lack of value.  I do not know how common the usage of "Pascal's Flaw" is, but by rights it should be very widespread. Luis Dantas 19:04, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Fallacy?
Talk:Frank Hamilton Cushing

message: Citations to reliable sources are needed for much of the recently added content criticizing Cushing's work. Other content that does not appear to be controversial would benefit from sourcing, but the major issue is the content criticizing his work, some of which should be edited for tone, even if it can be supported by reliable sources. - Donald Albury 14:47, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: The Professional Controversy section is written much differently than the rest of the article and seems highly opinionated, especially at the end where the writer says "we" multiple times. Not an expert on Cushing but that definitely isn't written right. J22M (talk) 17:00, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed this as well. The last sentence literally offers an opinion for the reader. 2600:6C51:717F:E879:C5FD:9DA2:4AD1:7F3D (talk) 01:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

text: The problem I saw was that much of the section was unsourced. While the behavior described was consistent with the reported norms of the era, it was not sourced. Even if we feel in our hearts that something is true, in Wikipedia we require that everything in an article be verifiable from reliable sources, and I think content about the character and reputation of a person, living or dead, needs in-text citations to reliable sources. I accordingly removed all of the unsourced content. - Donald Albury 12:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional Controversy Section
Talk:Jesse Walter Fewkes

message: While working on another article, I came across the bibliography on Fewkes on the internet archive and included it in the article.  Additionally this internet archive search  lists a large number of his works which may contribute to the article. --Mike Cline (talk) 14:37, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for Jesse Walter Fewkes

message: Per WP:COMMONNAME and this ngram: .  Although J. Walter Fewkes was used as his authorname on a few works, the great majority of his works were authored as Jesse Walter Fewkes. --Mike Cline (talk) 14:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved to Jesse Walter Fewkes
Talk:Nampeyo

message: Removed "Iris".  The facts of this article refer to the original Nampeyo, whose pottery was initially discoved by Fewkes. She is referred to as "Hano Nampeyo}, "Nampeyo of Hano", or simply "Nampeyo". Geneology records show Iris to be the grand-daughter of "Mama Nampeyo", and daughter of Fannie.Amerindianarts 21:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Iris

message: I removed this recent addition:
:She avoided the use of symmetry in her decorative schemes and, after 1905, increasingly incorporated design elements believed to have resonance with her responsibilities as matriarch of the Corn Clan, a role she assumed following the death of her mother, White Corn.
Some of the Nampeyo pots we have photos of  at Commons are symmetrical, so the first sentence is incorrect. The second sentence needs a source to be used. --Pete Tillman (talk) 15:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed uncited material 
Talk:Bureau of American Ethnology

message: How ethnology is conducted
 Samuel mhanzi (talk) 05:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnology
Talk:Alice Cunningham Fletcher

message: Why does this book say she was born in Boston, MA in 1845? —Viriditas | Talk 01:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This information also appears in  This could have been a source. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 13:48, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tertiary sources that are over 100 years old may have errors. That's why we use them sparingly, if at all. --Animalparty! (talk) 00:06, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography of 1889

message: Also states she was born in Boston, MA in 1845.   —Viriditas | Talk 03:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Volume V10, Page 496 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica

message: Dividing the Reservation: Alice C. Fletcher's Nez Perce Allotment Diaries and Letters, 1889-1892 edited by Nicole Tonkovich, 2016, Washington State University Press Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 18:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diaries published (new book) 
Talk:Francis La Flesche

message: * in-line references
* more references
* more on his childhood
* more on his careers
* more on his family
* more on his impact on his contemporaries
* more on his impact on the Osage Nation.
* his bibliography
* any other discography other than the Osage ceremonies for the BAE's archives?
CJLippert 05:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do to improve 
Talk:Joseph LaFlesche

message: The spacing of the last name varies between the four family members listed on WP. Most sources list it the French way - La Flesche. Your thoughts? • Freechildtalk 04:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of name 
Talk:George Crook

message: Sources  and  have conflicting birth years. Are there other sources that clarify this?—C45207 | Talk 22:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added citations. Hal Jespersen (talk) 00:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth? 
Talk:Wendell Phillips

message: I'm really kind of surprised that the quotations have been kept around without any source information.Ebt66 (talk) 23:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While researching a quote by Wendell Phillips, I noticed that the year of birth for Mr Phillips was different between the Wikipedia page and the Wikiquote page. As far as I have been able to determine, the DOB on Wikiquote (29 November 1811) is correct, and the Wikipedia date (29 November 1814) is incorrect. I will make this correction to the Wikipedia page: however, since I have made only a handful of edits on Wikipedia, I am not sure how such a change ought to be documented. Accordingly, I am recording the information for Wendell Phillips' date of birth here on the Talk page, and will make reference to this edit when I change the date. Wendell Phillips: Liberty’s Hero, James Brewer Stewart, Louisiana University Press, p. 3 :  contains the following sentence : “In that first new Beacon Hill residence on November 29, 1811, Wendell Phillips was born.” The Encyclopedia Americana 1919 Edition (p. 764)  also gives Wendell Phillips’ DOB as November 29, 1811. Each of these books can be found using a Google Books search. CononOfSamos (talk) 23:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth information is in Error 

message: The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
Wendel Phillips 2601:282:8902:4980:ECE3:407E:6E76:5E3 (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freedom
Talk:Mixtec

message: While most Mixtec peoples live in the present-day state of Oaxaca, a sizeable number, perhaps 25% of this indigenous culture, reside in the Mexican State of Puebla.
You really need to put out some year or centuries, I dont have a clue when the Mixtecs civilization was when I am reading this article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awakened82 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixtec in Puebla 

message: Ok - I was too quick in removing the image of the monte alban skull, of course it might be from the mixtec phase. However isn't the image of 8 Deer more appropriate?·Maunus· ·ƛ· 19:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I am using library resources to edit this page and add citations for a class.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steveirwin5 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making edits for a class 

message: Corrections were made to the second paragraph in the first section because it was inaccurate. The subregions of the Mixteca are referred to in Spanish as Mixteca Alta, Baja and Coasta, not alto or bajo. Furthermore, these divisions are based on geography, not on an "economic caste" system. The people of the Baja were not poorer nor were the people of the Alta richer and higher in status. Both subregions had powerful urban settlements occupied by people of mixed statuses. Moreover, the Costa did not come under political control of the Mixtecs until the conquest of the area by Eight Deer and his armies. Thus, the language would not be more related to the people of the Baja but to the people of the Alta, since that is who settled there.
LaArqueologa (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections made to 2nd paragraph in first section
Category talk:Airliner accidents and incidents involving deliberate crashes

message: Would it be possible for someone to start a page devoted to the use of aircraft as weapons? Said page would include usage in fact (Kamikaze aircraft, 9/11) in plans (Project Bojinka, Samuel Byck, Auburn Calloway) and in fiction (Black Sunday). Orville Eastland 22:27, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WW International

message: I have trimmed out some passages that make the article overly focused on the Kurbo app. I have also removed a number of statements that were not supported by their citation, or where the citation was not relevant to the Kurbo controversy, as well as some WP:ADVERT material. Several relevant citations in favour of the app were mentioned in the last edit, and I have cited them and tried to improve the match between the publications and how they are used (although the one experimental study was not of high quality).
BrightVamp (talk) 04:27, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurbo proportional coverage and citations 

message: But there's a lot to be said about the rebrand. See e.g. the BBC's 2019 article What's gone wrong at Weight Watchers? Equinox ◑ 17:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company history stops at 2018 

message: I have removed the reference to the Zoe Harcombe website, as an unreliable fringe source. 
Apologies, as I may have forgotten to tag why it was removed whilst making the edit. 
Luther Blissetts (talk) 05:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed <nowiki>{{Unreliable fringe source}}</nowiki>
Talk:Health Service Executive

message: This article has the potential to be an article on the Health Service Executive or even Health Service Executive (Ireland) rather than simple the geography of the system. Any comments? Djegan 22:35, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Some of the "HSE services" section reads more like an official leaflet than an encyclopedia article. "Finally, if you are wondering..." is not the tone of an encyclopedia! 86.141.199.66 (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a bit of rewording 

message: News and criticism section is particularly non-compliant with NPOV and is heavily biased against the body. 93.107.203.204 (talk) 16:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?? 

message: Why does the name of this article include '(Ireland)'?  It seems this is only article with the words 'Health Service Executive' so why not just rename the article to :Health Service Executive and switch the re-direct?  Hmains (talk) 02:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: name

message: Alot of the information on this page is very out of date including the list of National Directors and some of information about the structure of the HSE. How can you go about getting this updated?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.191.241.9 (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alot of information out of date 
Talk:Maricopa people

message: There is currently a sub-stub on Xalychidom -- all external sources point to this tribe as being a sub-unit of the Piipaash / Maricopa.  Thoughts from someone more informed?  -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 01:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were historically separate peoples, and they are to a certain extent still separate (some people identify themselves as Xalychidoma). Most of the "Maricopas" at Salt River are Xalychidoma, most at Gila River are Maricopas. --Node 05:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert Tree Cody

message: Contrary to this edit, the Navajo Reservation is not in or near Phoenix, Arizona. Badagnani 20:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange edit

message: I am sorry, but how far can this be pushed?
Robert Tree Cody is the adopted son of the actor Iron Eyes Cody and Cody's wife Bertha Parker.
This is the Adopted son of Iron Eyes Cody who claimed his entire life that he was Native American but he was not Native American at all. Iron Eyes Cody was Italian (Sicilian parentage).
What you are left with is the Adopted son of an Italian and a Native American.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.184.66.81 (talk) 07:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You're completely omitting his biological parents though, both of whom were Native Americans. Also, even though Iron Eyes Cody had no indigenous background, he married a Native American woman and both of them raised their adopted sons to identify with being indigenous. --Ismail (talk) 05:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Native American
Talk:Phaseolus acutifolius

message: ...but what does it taste like?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:6A00:B4D0:E92D:9280:C50D:EDED (talk) 05:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Talk:The Matchlock Gun

message: I removed the following paragraph because it shows a clear bias, 
The book has a definite bias that portrays Edward, his family, and all settlers in heroic ways while simultaneously portraying American Indians as brutal less-than-human savages. In this story and others like it, readers do not learn that American Indians were fighting to protect their way of life, to protect their families. 
V. Joe 13:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why paragraph removed
Talk:San Bruno elfin

message: Since this is a subspecies, might it not be better to move this article to Moss' Elfin or Callophrys mossii and turn the current content into a section? 140.163.188.71 22:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This suggestion is a very bad idea for several reasons:
*The San Bruno elfin butterfly is an important subject in and of itself and deserves an entire page due to the depth of info available about it.
*The other articles need to exist and be substantive for this to be a subject even worth discussing
*Any endangered species warrants a full page on its own. Anlace 19:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Grand Old Man of the Army

message: While the UK term may be more wildly know, Scott's use of the term predates it by about 50 years. Perhaps he should be first?
Since Stransham was a Royal Marines officer, and the RM are most definitely not part of the Army (and are likely to be extremely displeased if anyone suggests they are), I'd really like to see some evidence of this "title". -- Necrothesp 18:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I feel this article should be a disambig page with the bulk of the material moved to the target articles. Any objections? Is there more to this article that I don't see? - Canglesea (talk) 01:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Converted to a DAB. - Canglesea (talk) 01:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation article?
Talk:Spanish missions in New Mexico

message: Two of the churches on the list, 
* El Santuario de Chimayó -  Site of an  Easter pilgrimage by foot to the holy spot every year. Not a mission.  
* Santuario de Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe - Founded c. 1777; believed to be nation's oldest shrine dedicated to Our Lady of Guadalupe. Not a mission.
--aren't actually missions, so perhaps shouldn't be on this list. They are famous NM churches, however. Keep or drop -- opinions?
The above are proposed edits, which are spamblocked at the moment because
*"The following link has triggered our spam protection filter: http://www.newmexico.org" -- Spam filter notice
This is the website of the New Mexico Tourism Department, which doesn't seem to be working properly now, but certainly shouldn't be blacklistd! Anyway, I've reported the problem to MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist‎ (Request for unlisting of New Mexico Tourism Department). Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 20:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unblocked now, so above are real edits. I removed the newmexico.org links anyway, as all were dead -- and none I've tried elsewhere on WP have worked for weeks. Pete Tillman (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Missions
MediaWiki talk:Anoneditwarning

message: Please replace
{{fullurl:Special:UserLogin/signup
with
{{fullurl:Special:CreateAccount
the current is a redirect as a result of phab:T110277, and using the actual target page would avoid sending users on (html) redirects. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 03:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 13 September 2019 

message: It’s more common nowadays to write the noun username as one word. EthanGaming7640 (talk) 01:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 8 September 2021 

message: Oshwah: To avoid a div-span-flip lint error, and also misnested tags that the linter detects as missing end tag/stripped tags for , please change
:
to
:
— Anomalocaris (talk) 04:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Anomalocaris - Bah! You beat me to it! ;-) While I was looking at Special:LintErrors/misc-tidy-replacement-issues in response to the last request you and Jonesey95 made, I noticed that this page was on the list too! Stand by - I'll get that fixed up now... ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs)  04:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Anomalocaris - The deed has been done (diff). That's two "thanks" that I owe you now. ;-) Seriously, I appreciate it a lot - thanks for doing that. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs)  04:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, both of you. I was going to get to this one too, but I had to step away from WP after dealing with the first edit request. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 14 December 2021
Talk:National Government (United Kingdom)

message: "Britain declared war, supported by all of the Dominions bar Ireland (Éire)"
This may not be correct as in so far as I know Ireland was by that time no longer a Crown Dominion.
--Gramscis cousinTalkStalk 15:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ireland had a tendency to talk the talk without walking the walk on a number of imperial matters. It stopped participating in a lot of Commonwealth activities in the 1930s but didn't actually take the steps to formally leave until 1949. As far as the UK in 1939 was concerned Ireland was a Dominion - most obviously it was the Dominions Secretary who handled relations with Ireland. Timrollpickering (talk) 19:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

text: I have to agree, Ireland effectively ceased to be a dominion in 1937 with the passage of Constitution of Ireland. The article should simply read "Britain declared war, supported by all of the Dominions bar Ireland. Ejointhehouse (talk) 10:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be a rewriting of history. Ireland was still a Dominion at the time even if it acted like it wasn't one. Timrollpickering (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominions 

message: I have cited John Buchan's fictionalized account in "The Gap in the Curtain" as it (1) is contemporary (1932) with the events described (2) Buchan was an MP close to the period (1927-?) (3) the events in the book, although using fictional names, are an accurate representation of the political climate of the times.D A Patriarche, BSc (talk)  (talk) 20:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  National vs Coalition Government