Talk:Status of territories occupied by Israel in 1967

message: I don't know if Israel makes quasi-legalistic claims arguing that the Golan Heights are "disputed" and not "occupied" terrority, but: (1) The UN resolutions mentioned in the article do state very clearly that the Golan Heights is occupied; (2) Israel has contested that in its actions, if not its words, for example by passing the Golan Heights law. Brian Tvedt 23:07, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it belongs, as I've never seen Israel or supporters claiming that the Golan Heights is not "occupied". Jayjg (talk) 16:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It would seem, however, to be well worthy of inclusion based on the current title of this article.  Marsden 18:41, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But not based on the opening sentence, as Israel's supporters do not seem to say it is "disputed", nor based on the contents, which present no arguments for it being "disputed". Perhaps this should be remerged, or renamed. Jayjg (talk) 17:54, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the Golan belongs here too 

message: There is something seriously wrong with the footnotes here... They need to be changed/fixed.
A student of history 18:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Status of territories captured by Israel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121210160010/http://unispal.un.org:80/unispal.nsf/0080ef30efce525585256c38006eacae/181c72112f4d0e0685257ac500515c6c?OpenDocument to http://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/0080ef30efce525585256c38006eacae/181c72112f4d0e0685257ac500515c6c?OpenDocument
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130131073609/http://www.un.int/wcm/content/site/palestine/ to http://www.un.int/wcm/content/site/palestine/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Status of territories occupied by Israel in 1967. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100402070502/http://uninews.unimelb.edu.au/view.php?articleID=5387 to http://uninews.unimelb.edu.au/view.php?articleID=5387
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109001552/http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/0/a39a906c89d3e98685256c29006d4014 to http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/0/a39a906c89d3e98685256c29006d4014
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/0080ef30efce525585256c38006eacae/181c72112f4d0e0685257ac500515c6c?OpenDocument
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141011202654/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/07/state-of-palestine_n_2425682.html to http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/07/state-of-palestine_n_2425682.html
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130418225647/http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/magazines/32-political-platform/28464-palestine-threatens-to-sue-israel-at-icc.html to http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/magazines/32-political-platform/28464-palestine-threatens-to-sue-israel-at-icc.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/palestinians-un-upgrade-to-nonmember-observer-state-struggles-ahead-over-possible-powers/2012/11/29/8f3c3f78-3a59-11e2-9258-ac7c78d5c680_story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110221203359/http://www.aijac.org.au/resources/reports/international_law.pdf to http://www.aijac.org.au/resources/reports/international_law.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: this looks like a good quality and relevant source... “WarKosign” 13:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good until you start reading.  Then it is revealed as just another pro-Israel think tank. Not reliable for fact. Zerotalk 02:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new source 

message: In the lead it says that the Israeli High Court refers to western Golan as being held in “belligerent occupation” as well...I don’t think that’s correct according to source... Zarcademan123456 (talk) 01:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are correct.  I think that the HC only regards the West Bank (not including EJ) as being under belligerent occupation. But a good source is needed. Zerotalk 02:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golan Heights 

message: "The difference between a territory that is "occupied" by a State and one that is "annexed" by that State is a legal distinction." Selfstudier (talk) 15:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Such an annexation proclamation would either consist of a declaration that part or all of the West Bank forms an integral part of Israel, as Israel did in relation to East Jerusalem in 1980, or that “Israeli law applies” to the area, as it did in relation to the Golan Heights in 1981." Selfstudier (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: :Status of territories occupied by Israel in 1967 →  – On the status of the Golan Heights, there is an article Status of the Golan Heights. Instead, this article may focus on the status of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Caenus (talk) 18:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As per notification on your talk page, you may not participate in internal project discussions until you have 500 edits so I will remove the tags from this RFC and you can discuss with other editors informally. Selfstudier (talk) 19:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. What do you think about my proposal? Caenus (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You want to change the scope of the article so as to exclude Golan and Sinai. You mention that Golan is covered by another article as well, which is true but Sinai is not. There is a recent article Legality of the Israeli occupation of Palestine which I think covers the matters you are trying to cover? Selfstudier (talk) 10:42, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 November 2022 

message: I've just grouped the items in the "Disputed territories" section into three categories. This highlights that the items regarding "Qualification of occupation" have a great deal of overlap. Dotyoyo (talk) 09:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Disputed territories" list organization