Talk:Eskimo curlew

message: fork!!! could we please get some info on the decline and why they are near extinction!!?? there's nothing there atm- nada!. I'm not using my wikipedia account atm (user:kotare) but when I get back on I'll try to remedy this sorry state of affairs. My understanding of the matter is that they were hunted for food on a vast scale in the US in a similar scenario to the extinction of the  passenger pigeon. They were called "doughbirds" and they used to stick their bodies in cans. more info to come soon hopefully..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.52.3 (talk) 08:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Decline

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bristle-thighed Curlew which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 09:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: I know it's difficult to know whether to write about this bird in the past or present tense, because it may or may not be extinct; but the article should treat it one way or the other, not both.  At the moment there is at least one sentence that uses both past and present tenses!  Somebody more knowledgeable than I should decide whether to treat the bird as extinct or not, and then make the article consistent, one way or the other.  J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 18:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistent tense? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Eskimo curlew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091129055425/http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/curlew/ to http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/curlew/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Eskimo curlew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080412122247/http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline02.html to http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~remsen/SACCBaseline02.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719234002/http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/curlew/history.htm to http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/curlew/history.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060417183932/http://texasbirds.org/tbrc/eskimo.html to http://texasbirds.org/tbrc/eskimo.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Okay, I'm going to try to assemble all the sources on later sightings here, to figure out how to describe them.
Totals: Northwest Territories (11), Texas (6), Ontario (5), Massachusetts (3), Manitoba (3), Saskatchewan (2), Alaska (2), Nova Scotia (2), North Carolina(1), Guatemala (1), Argentina (1), New Jersey (1), Labrador (1)
*Northwest Territories x 4, 1964 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Texas 2, 1964 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Ontario 3, 1968 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Texas x 2, 1968 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Massachusetts 1970 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Ontario 1970 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Massachusetts 2, 1972 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Ontario, 1972 ("Possible", BD)
*Texas 1972 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*North Carolina 1973 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Ontario 1974 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Northwest Territories 1976 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Ontario 2, 1976 ("Possible"  BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Guatemala 1977 ("Possible" BD)
*Manitoba 1980 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Northwest Territories 1980 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Alaska 2, 1981 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Texas 23, 1981 ("Confirmed" ADFG, "Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Northwest Territories 1982 ("Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Saskatchewan 1982 ("Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Alaska 2, 1983 ("Reported" ADFG, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Northwest Territories 6, 1985 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Nebraska, 1987 ("Confirmed" ADFG, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Northwest Territories 2, 1987 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Texas 1987 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC) - this report of 3 birds  ?
*Argentina 4, 1990 ("Reported" ADFG, "Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*New Jersey 1992 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Northwest Territories 1992 ("Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Texas 1994 Rejected, but "intriguing" - some indication rejection was driven largely by priors? 
*Labrador 10, 1995 ("Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Manitoba 1996 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Saskatchewan 1996 ("Possible" BD, "Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Manitoba 1996 ("Reported" ADFG)
*Texas 1998 Not Accepted
*Massachusetts 2002 ("Possible" BD)
*Nova Scotia 2, 2002 ("Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Northwest Territories 2004 ("Hypothetical" COSEWIC)
*Nova Scotia 2006 ("Possible" BD)
==== Sources ====
Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Birdwatching Daily
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada
:Okay, the sources are not totally consistent in this, so my inclination is to just say something like "The last unambiguous record is the bird shot in the Barbados in '63, but there have been a few dozen reported sight records since then" without trying to be too specific on the details because which sight reports are mentioned by which authorities and how they're evaluated is a bit of random bag, other than maybe to note the largest (23 birds in Texas), and the most recent (Nova Scotia in '06), both of which can be reasonably cited to publications.  Unless there's an objection? WilyD 13:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sightings 

message: Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Birdwatching Daily
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada
:Okay, the sources are not totally consistent in this, so my inclination is to just say something like "The last unambiguous record is the bird shot in the Barbados in '63, but there have been a few dozen reported sight records since then" without trying to be too specific on the details because which sight reports are mentioned by which authorities and how they're evaluated is a bit of random bag, other than maybe to note the largest (23 birds in Texas), and the most recent (Nova Scotia in '06), both of which can be reasonably cited to publications.  Unless there's an objection? WilyD 13:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: It says that hunting was banned in 1912, but where exactly was that the case? Just in the US? In a couple of South American countries? Worldwide? Kelvinnkat (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hunting prohibition