lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sarajevo Tunnel

message: The link to the documentary 'The Secret Tunnel' seems to be inoperative.  Does anyone know a different link, or if this one will be fixed soon?  If not, we should remove it. 24.68.249.197 18:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed this link as it is still inoperative.  If anyone has a working one, please reinsert it. 24.68.249.197 23:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: Would it be worth mentioning the conditions of the tunnel.  Water, ammunition, rising water levels and electricity made this potentialy explosive, and made the tunnel highly dangerous.  
Also might be worth mentioning the current conditions.  The bosnian government did not maintain the tunnel and only 100metres (i believe) was maintained by the Koler family at one end.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.115.147.165 (talk) 12:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The conditions 

message: 20 millions tons of food? Counting population of 500 000 and 3 years of siege, it make abt 30 kg of food per person per day. Unbelievable. Ciacho5 (talk) 19:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amount of food transported 

message: "...and approximately 400,000 Muslims used the tunnel to flee Sarajevo.[46]". The article referred to actually says : "...was a tunnel — a tunnel that saved some 400,000 citizens from starvation, military defeat, and total Serb occupation." It says something else, has different meaning. Refers to food, medical supplies and arms brought into town. Please, see wiki page on demographics of Sarajevo, in city proper and greater city area. 400000 leaving the besieged part of the city would simply mean that the city was deserted through the tunnel. It was not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urednik2014 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose of the Tunnel
Talk:Crash and Burn

message: There are now several music entries for "Crash and Burn."  Perhaps the Disambiguation page should be inserted as the default.
Kiodane 18:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree! This diasmbig-page should be located at Crash and Burn. --Bensin (talk) 17:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Pembroke's Men

message: The relationship between the two plays is uncertain; Oliver's view is only one side of a long argument. Given that some scholars question or reject the entire concept of "reported texts," an assertion that A Shrew is "almost certainly" one is unsound. (A discussion of the two plays would logically belong elsewhere than in this article.) Ugajin (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''A Shrew'' and ''The Shrew''
Talk:Playing company

message: Hi. I've added a timeline of playing companies to this article. It is located at Template:English Renaissance playing company timeline. It's implemented as a template because I believe it will be useful in multiple articles. I'm sure there's still much room for improvement, and as time permits, I'll continue to tweak it over the next days? weeks? months? years?. If you have notes but are uncomfortable editing the somewhat complex timeline syntax, please comment at Template talk:English Renaissance playing company timeline.
I'll mention that much of the information currently comes from the germane Wikepedia articles; this is not ideal, and I've begun citing many dates within the timeline code itself (using comment text which appears after "#"). Phil wink (talk) 17:37, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: Thank you for the excellent work! — Robert Greer (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  excellent
Talk:This Beautiful Republic

message: Adam Smith left the band, new guitarist is in. Sources say they're staying as 4 piece band, but have been preforming with another guitarist; I cannot find his name. 71.244.231.48 (talk) 00:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Guitarist Change

message: andy (drummer) left the band. new guy cameron is in, just thought i would share that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.244.143.172 (talk) 21:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the tip. It took me a while to find it. I see it's changed on their MySpace page. Royalbroil 23:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Drummer change

message: In the picture for the artical was the guitarist playing an Eastwood guitar?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.120.153.20 (talk) 18:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Eastwood guitar?
Talk:Gloucester Daily Times

message: This page was moved from Gloucester Times, which now redirects here. ●DanMS • Talk 01:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

message: In keeping with what seems to be the accepted practice around here, the name of the article should be the name printed in big letters atop the front page of the paper ... and that's "Gloucester Daily Times", unless it's been changed recently. Unfortunately, because Gloucester Daily Times, currently a redirect page, has been edited before, I can't make the move by right; we need an admin. If there's no strong objection here, I'll ask for an admin in a week or so, or next time I visit this page ... whichever is later. ``` W i k i W i s t a h W a s s a p ``` 00:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change: Gloucester Daily Times 

message: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support for reasons stated above. ``` W i k i W i s t a h W a s s a p ``` 20:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Grenada (disambiguation)

message: Most entries on this disambiguation page refer to articles that have the spelling Granada. Wouldn't it be best to split this list into Grenada (disambiguation) and Granada (disambiguation)? --FordPrefect42 19:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it works best as a single page because people often don't know whether what they're looking for is spelled with three A's or two. However, it doesn't solve the problem if the entries are still separated by spelling. To fix this, I moved all entries, regardless of spelling, into the various geographic categories. I then made the rarer "Grenada's" distinct with boldface E's, which may look odd, but it was the best idea I had. Any improvements are welcome! Moanzhu 19:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it is better as a single page, but despite the bolding, the variant spellings were nearly indistinguishable in the list. older ≠ wiser 20:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split?
Talk:Bangladeshi cricket team in Sri Lanka in 2007

message: The template you use doesn't look good. Can you please replace it with a first class match template like in 2006-07 Ashes series? Guy0307 20:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The template is hugely more versatile. Okay, I'm almost certainly biased as I created it; but see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket/Archive 34#A new template for First Class matches - Template:Test match for reasons why -- including where the creator of the original template agrees that this is better designed and much easier to implement -- indeed, the new one was designed to replace the one in use on the Ashes page. AllynJ 20:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Then can you make the inning's result bolder? I think the inning's result should be a bit different than the other things... Guy0307 19:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Template Used for Mathces
File talk:World Trade Center 9-11 Attacks Illustration with Vertical Impact Locations.svg

message: What does "H" stand for (As in "About 0.87 H" next to the WTC 1 impact point.)  Could someone who knows either add a legend or just spell it out in the two places it's used? Alex 19:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume it means height (of the towers), but it's not at all clear. It would be helpful if someone who knows how to modify these things could do so. Vilĉjo 10:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of turnpikes in New York

message: The map at  looks useful. --NE2 04:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any reason Bridgehampton-Sag Harbor Turnpike isn't on this list? ----DanTD (talk) 13:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete?
Template talk:Washington, D.C., sports

message: I think the Orioles should be included in this list. Yes Washington has the Nationals now, but they didn't for 35 years. Most of us grew up as Orioles fans, and if you include other Maryland teams, as Washington teams, then the O's have to be in this list also. The Baysox are listed, and of all teams, Del Marva, which is twice as far from DC and Baltimore is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.222.130.188 (talk • contribs) 
:I'd go the other route and delist all the teams that don't play in D.C. or the nearby suburbs, i.e.: almost all the minor league baseball teams (except the Potomac Nationals and the Baysox) and Crystal Palace FC which plays in Annapolis. After all, this template doesn't include the Ravens either. It would be better to create a separate Baltimore sports template. --D. Monack | talk 03:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead & removed all the teams more than 35 miles from downtown DC. This is admittedly an arbitrary distance, but it was specifically chosen to exclude Baltimore-based teams and be objective. We have to draw the line somewhere. --D. Monack | talk 03:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't think the arbitrary distance should be used, but the official Metropolitan Statistical area, as defined by the census. This makes the most sense, would disclude Baltimore, and include Frederick. --RockRNC 02:22, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I have no problem with using the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria MSA. --D. Monack | talk 02:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Desi cuisine

message: There seems to be confusing overlapping with this category, Indian cuisine, South Asian cuisine, etc.  Can anyone with more local knowledge help with this?
Preferably it should be under a hierarchy to follow the rest of the naming conventions, i.e. (Continent) cuisine -> part of continent -> country -> ethnic group; or something similar.  Unless of course in this case the ethnic group spans countries...but it would be rather redundant to repeat the country sub-categories within that group category, no?
Misterx2000 (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Better categorisation
Talk:12:01 PM (1990 film)

message: Does anyone know what UK DVD this is on?
I can't find any evidence it has been released.
(The 1993 Film with Martin Landau does have a Region 2 release).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Excelis4 (talk • contribs) 09:10, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK DVD?
Talk:12:01 (1993 film)

message: The name of the 1993 film is actually "12:01", not "12:01 PM".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.144.195.188 (talk) 06:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The plot summary of the article states that the film's running time is 94 minutes. The sidebar says it's 92 minutes. Which is correct? 216.158.163.227 (talk) 03:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Running time

message: Why is the ending described as a "pseudo-happy ending"?  More specifically, why pseudo?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stu 1977 SEmelb (talk • contribs) 04:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: The synopsis at IMDB was edited later than the stuff was added here as far as I can see so it may have gone from here to IMDB. But I don't know when the synopsis was first added to IMDB as I have no account there. Dmcq (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Evidence suggests we copied from them, although it's not conclusive. Note that their version says, "Dr. Thadius Moxley henchmen are also behind Lisas murder". This mistake was corrected just a couple of weeks after the content was placed here, leaving a very short window for them to have copied from us. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: Since it was the writers of the original 12:01 PM short film that sued the producers of Groundhog Day, shouldn't talk of that lawsuit be in the article for THAT short film and not this TV movie Especially since while loosely based on the original, this TV movie clearly plagiarized Groundhog DAy since it was far more like that than the original short film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:D500:3D00:6D82:7051:DB9F:6971 (talk) 09:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  legal action in wrong article?
Talk:Miami Nights: Singles in the City

message: Where is VIP beach for Christ sakes?!--Unsigned comment added by 216.9.250.6 (talk) 19:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  VIP beach 

message: This article reads as an advertisement; use of superlatives and without objectivity or NPOV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.159.97.4 (talk) 08:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising language 

message: KS HET  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.21.249 (talk) 07:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  THE SK  

message: It is not clear to me that this article meets the notability criteria.  Nolabob (talk) 01:27, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Hookahville

message: Any idea when the festival will be moved back to pataskala? I'm sorry, but the other venue is just not not good.
I am not sure that a personal bad experience is worthy of a wiki article.  Please consider revising the section "The Line" to something more objective.  The section on "Losing its luster" reeks of a single person having a bad experience and the writer is trying to give the whole scene a bad reputation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.95.240.241 (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Franklin Merrell-Wolff

message: Notes towards some edits
1) It is strange that the only work cited here is a review of American spiritual teachers, especially since there is a major academic study (Leonard, Ron. Transcendental Philosophy of Franklin Merrell-Wolff. Albany, NY: State University Press of New York, 1999.) and his works are published out of SUNY Press.
2) The opening lines are a distortion of the events of FMW's account in "Pathways through Space": by his own account, he didn't seek this consciousness but rather found it and then sought to articulate a philosophy around it. It is important to note that he was on the road to being a successful academic, having acquired a job at Stanford, when he experienced what he called Consciousness-without-an-Object. He then quit his job and started up the ashram. The sequence is important for maintaining neutrality on the question of whether he actually experienced this or not (the current phrasing implies that he did not, by default, experience what he claimed).
3) The "philosophy" section should be organized around his two primary concepts: "Consciousness-without-an-Object" and "Introception" -- These concepts were both the most unique and the most significant elements of his articulation and were also the most influential when you look at those who cite him, most notably John Lilly's 1975, "God as Consciousness without an Object" -- FMW had a great influence on Lilly and is cited in a number of his works. 
I'll work on getting some edits together for this, but have not yet had time to trace out the citations. However, a quick search does reveal that the Merrell-Wolff foundation does keep a list of articles citing him (http://www.merrell-wolff.org/works_about). Perhaps if anyone knows works on this list, or others, they might chip in and get this article into shape. Etherfire (talk) 03:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

message: This article is included in the American_Christian_mystics category but I don't believe Franklin Merrell-Wolff's philosophy had any Christian associations or characteristics. Johnhorton379 (talk) 09:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Classification
Talk:Shakespeare bibliography

message: Hello, with the current format, do you feel that brief plot synopses would still be appropriate? Another question: do you think that each play could have an indication whether it is considered a comedy, tragedy, or history? Thanks, Kyoko 07:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if plot summaries are necessary considering the articles provide that - however they could be added , by adding a second row to each title and having it span several rows above (see below). I'm also planning on adding tragedy/comedy/history below the titles of the works in the next big edit. -- Editor at Large • talk 08:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, so that‘s what the play is about! I've never read it, nor seen it! Seriously, I was only thinking of a brief description, perhaps only one or two lines, such as "King Lear: an aged king faces troubles when he tries to divide his inheritance between his daughters." I don't know if having such descriptions is absolutely necessary, but they would help fill out the list, and perhaps further distinguish this list from the main articles. --Kyoko 21:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha.  I like the layout idea shown above, as well.  I think synopses would be excellent in the format you have proposed (except maybe in English) :) Wrad 21:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well yes, lorem ipsum can't be used for every synopsis. Someone would be bound to notice, eventually. --Kyoko 21:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm actually partial to Cicero's first Catiline Oration as placeholder text :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  synopses, etc. 

message: Could the categories within :Category:William Shakespeare plays be moved to its parent, :Category:Works by William Shakespeare? Which otherwise contains only one category, :Category:Poetry by William Shakespeare. This would flatten the taxonomy without creating confusion or lose significant information. — Robert Greer (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  move categories (and pages) within [[:Category:William Shakespeare plays]] to [[:Category:Works by William Shakespeare]] 

message: I have a good paragraph of information from one of my sources. I've paraphrased and cited the text, but seeing as the wording is pretty similar due to the fact that this is factual information, I'm not sure whether or not it would be better off in a block quotation. Any thoughts? Thanks, Iamthecheese44 (talk) 21:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing early performances of ''Titus Andronicus''
Talk:František Běhounek

message: Today there was a talk on Frantisek Behounek by Czech Radio (cannot remember the station), they said F. Behounek was not on the board of Norge flying to the North just his scientific instrument(s). (The airship has allegedly a limited space for the crew.)
Another note: His book "Fregata Novara pluje okolo sveta" is probably older than 1969 (maybe the last edition is mentioned) as I remember this book in the bookshelf of my parents definitely before the year 1969.
Mew1020 (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:MIT Science Fiction Society

message: Former HonSec who heard Gernsback etc. and figured this is far more important than a stub. Collect (talk) 22:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  fixed a bit 

message: The article had gotten to Start class, so I reassesed from Stub for all three Wikiprojects. — Lentower (talk) 01:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiproject class from Stub to Start

message: If you want to get this article up to GA it needs a lot of work, here are some suggestions:
* The lead isn't long enough - there should be at least one sentence summarising each section
* The article is lacking structure and just seems to be a collection of facts. I would suggest that it would make more sense to start off with the history, then go on to the society as it is today and then talk about the library.
* What was the original club called? It's not clear from the article that there was one - I only know that from the previous section on this page.
* There is very little information about the society itself - how is it constituted, how often and where does it meet?
* What does the development of Spacewar! at MIT have to do with the society - were any of the developers members? If some link between the two can't be made it shouldn't be in the article at all as it's wp:synthesis to just use this an an example of people at MIT being interested in Scifi.
* What does "the club was instrumental in microfilming Astounding Science Fiction" mean? Who was it done for? Did they actually do the work themselves? Was it all issues up until then or just some? Is the collection complete to date?
* What is the point of the temporary shelves picture and what are the quotes for? Is there some point being made here that I'm missing? Richerman   (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: All are good questions. The lede will probably be written as or after the article develops. I only know the answer to your last question, and have updated the caption accordingly.  Reify-tech (talk) 20:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some comments on the article 

message: Is there an official pronunciation of "MITSFS"? Just spelling out the letters is 6 syllables, so I usually heard it said as "mits-fuss". If this is the case, could somebody expert in International Phonetic Alphabet add it to the article?  Reify-tech (talk) 19:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Flock (birds)

message: My name is Cassandra and I am a university student. Part of my course this semester involves me picking an article to edit for Wikipedia. I have chosen this article to edit and will be using the following as resources: 
* Ornithology, Frank B. Gill 2007
* Role of Projection in the Control of Bird Flocks, Pearce et. al 2014.
* To Eat and Not Be Eaten: Modelling Resources and Safety in Multi-Species Animal Groups, Srinivasan and Quader 2012
This list is subject to change in the future when I begin writing in this article. Any comments or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Cdc832 (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article refers to "Chile Bush Thick-knees". There is no such species. Bush thick-knees are found in Australia. Peruvian thick-knees are found in Chile! MeegsC (talk) 01:06, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chile "Bush Thick-knees"
Talk:Franz Sacher

message: Obviously, a number of people are interested in making the Sachertorte kosher food (well, I don't know whether it's kosher, but there are numerous references to Franz Sacher as a Jew). I don't think its a good idea to refer to a persons religion, unless this person is a priest, rabbi, mullah, or strongly involved in religious stuff. In this case, I have removed the reference to being a jew, and replaced it with "Roman Catholic". Just for telling the truth, as the web (including Wikipedia) has numerous references saying he was a jew. Shalom, --Jean-Pierre Chaussette de Fromage (talk) 18:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this claim was re-inserted, with the even more indirect claim that Sacher was "born to a Jewish family". The footnote supporting this is to a blog, which in turn footnotes sources that give no good evidence for this claim. So unless there is better evidence for his Jewish background, and of its relevance to his life (was he persecuted by anti-Semites?), this claim doesn't belong here. --Macrakis (talk) 22:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Jew