lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nikon D70

message: Merged the D70s page, as the D70s is an upgrade of the D70 and doesn't warrent a page of it's own. This may need to be tidied up a little. Refer also comments about products on Talk:Nikon_Corporation. The D70s page will become a redirect to the D70 page. -- Xagent86 23:53, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of D70s page
Talk:The New Yorker

message: This may be too trivial to put in the article, but I will note here that currently, the date shown on the cover of each issue is a Monday, whereas it used to be Saturday. This change happened when the issue dated June 23, 1973, was followed by one dated July 2. I don't know the reason for the change. Richard K. Carson (talk) 23:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover dates 

message: Under the Fact Checking section, the line:
>In 2019, the Columbia Journalism Review said that "no publication has been more consistently identified with its rigorous fact-checking".
seems to imply that this is some kind of ranking awarded in 2019.  The context of the cited article however reflects the reputation of the New Yorker over it's entire lifetime.  Perhaps this could be reworded to better reflect the statement in the original article. 24.148.35.9 (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact Checking Quote
Talk:Benning Wentworth

message: Benning is worth a longer article, describing both the reasons why he wasn't popular and his role in securing recognition for New Hampshire as separate from the Massachusetts colony.
I also think Benington, Vermont was named for him, but can't confirm it to mu satisfaction. If anyone can verify this, please add it to the article. Lou I 19:25, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also Bennington, NH.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carrarabuildingcompany (talk • contribs) 12:37, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My apologies. A reference on this page prompted me to dig a little deeper. After further review, I have determined Elizabeth (wife of Benjamin Underwood) to be the daughter of Gov. John Wentworth, which makes her the sister of Gov. Benning Wentworth. CCDesigner (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Family Information
Talk:Nahal Brigade

message: "Not clear why these specific incidents should be mentioned here, this is not an article on the 1982 Lebanon war. Also it's very suspicious that you choose only a minority of instances that paint the brigade in a negative light."
* The "friendly fire" incident was the most serious such incident in the entire history of the IDF, and therefore deserves being mentioned. As it is in the Hebrew page on the Nahal brigade. It does not paint the Nahal brigade in a negative light. But rather, the Israel Air Force, or a single pilot of the Air Force. The Nahal soldiers were only the victims.
* The Bhamdoun prisoners episode does paint the Nahal in a negative light. At least in Israel. But this is not the "fans of the Nahal brigade" page. 
The prisoner exchanges it resulted in, had important consequences both in Lebanon and the Palestinian occupied territories. It strengthened PLO in Lebanon and contributed to the first intifada. It therefore deserves being mentioned.
Jokkmokks-Goran (talk) 00:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous reverts

message: The nahal brigade commander as of now is oran simcha. בןברוקמן (talk) 19:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding 

message: Why are the words "First Intifada" at the beginning of article, even before title? Please remove.Pritagros (talk) 11:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  14:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2024
Talk:Nudism

message: This article appears to have been forked from the naturist article.  Not sure why it was.--Work permit 02:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start Discussion for new page

message: Before reverting this redirect, please see discussion at Talk:Naturism#Merge_to_Naturism_and_Nudism and post your comments there. Thanks! Wakedream (talk) 18:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons article was redirected
Talk:Shabak

message: People, this page may have a lot of good information, but we definitely need more sources/citations.  Entire passages should be deleted if we can't find the sources, especially when it comes to legal and historical issues. Mg196 16:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A linkman is a man whoes job is to coordinate the reationships between two organizations. Most often, he is an "ambassador" of one of the organizations who is sent to the second organizations as a representative and address for messages. MathKnight 22:34, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: The picture, was of cource, photoshoped. It was used to compare Rabin to a Nazi and thus delegitimate him. MathKnight 07:29, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of References

message: This is all mere speculation. No secret service ever reveals their questioning techniques. Everything written re the 'shabak technique' is merely hearsay and has not enough concrete evidence to warrant inclusion in this article.
: As noted, quite a bit has been revealed due to related Supreme Court cases.  Even apart from that, claims supported by extensive research by several human-rights organizations deserved to be included (as claims, naturally).  --Zero 04:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as there are legit sources, I have no issues w/ Zero's comment.  Though the term "SHABAK Technique" sounds a bit contrived.  I am guessing in Israel they call it the "CIA Technique?!" Mg196 16:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: The fact that Shabak and not Mossad were responsible for getting a copy of Krushchev's speech has been known for quite a while, but now for the first time some of the insiders have told their version of the story to Haaretz.  See  and .  I didn't add these links to the article because links to Haaretz always go dead after a few weeks.  Maybe someone else will post the articles on the web more permanently so we can link to those.  --Zero 04:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krushchev's Speech 

message: I think a transliteration of מגן ולא יראה would be helpful and interesting, in addition to the translation. LordAmeth 06:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translit 

message: I propose a merger of the page Shabak_technique with Criticism section of this page. The textual content of the separate page is almost identical to the content of the Criticism section. No further or better information is conveyed by the separate page, which is itself a stub. The information provided in the Criticism section is more fully referenced.Khavakoz 09:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Diacritic

message: I have added :   (224 rows).
Not (yet) used: . -DePiep (talk) 07:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Diacritics in Unicode 

message: The short explanation of why has been necessary to use  in each case where the diacritic is being demonstrated against a dotted circle (as "neutral grey background") is to mitigate  For the longer explanation, see template talk:Unichar#Combining diacritics are displaying as tofu on Android - fault may be in cwith= handling?. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason to use serif with dotted circle 

message: Can anyone explain why the section Diacritic#Diacritics that do not produce new letters exists? Is there any reason not to merge it into Diacritic#Languages with letters containing diacritics? As far as I know (which is not very far at all) the only case of where a letter+diacritic is considered unique and distinct for sort order, is  in Spanish (as is or was ). If we really need to go into that detail (and I question that too), surely the section should be about those few exceptions. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diacritics that do not produce new letters v Languages with letters containing diacritics
Talk:Bar (diacritic)

message: I am not familiar with all but two of these characters, and therefore hesitate to write about the other characters. Furthermore I am not at all sure how to even start this article, so if anyone who does know would like to give it a go, please do. These are all the characters I know of which use a diacritic bar, it is possible I left out a few. — Jor 21:21, Jan 11, 2004 (UTC)
There are some barred characters i have seen that do not have unicode assignments, i believe. One is a barred letter "c" used to represent a voiceless alveolar affricate (this is interchangeable with <c> and <¢>) . Another is a barred small capital letter "i" used to represent a high central lax vowel. — ishwar  (SPEAK) 06:15, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
I think a bar does not equal to a stroke, partly because both name exist in Unicode, but also their shapes. A bar is horizontal, while a stroke is from top-right to bottom-left. Compare L bar (Ƚ, ƚ) and L stroke (Ł, ł), or O bar (Ɵ, ɵ) and O stroke (Ø, ø). -✉ Hello World! 08:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

message: The number 7 is missing from the number list, even though it's called out in the introduction. I'm unsure how to add a 7 with a strikethrough.--Mcps39 (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you misunderstand what the introduction is saying. The bar sometimes seen in 7 is not a diacritic, but merely a glyph variation to make it more distinct from 1, so it would not be the subject of this article. (On the other hand, it is hard to see what criteria might have been used to compile the list that make up the bulk of this article, so confusion is to be expected.) 95.199.143.153 (talk) 20:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 2019

message: From looking at the edit history, this article has been receiving minor edits (though mostly from IP addresses, but who am I to complain) for at least two years, so presumably someone is maintaining it. But to what end? What information does it contain?? Apart from the introduction, it appears to just be one long list (sectioned by scripts), where the items are … some sort of productions? Set up according to what principles? There might be some merit in listing precompositions made from combining bars and strokes, but a lot of the entries rather seem to be purely graphical: there is one which produces the Greek letter Psi from the Latin letter U! What conclusion is a reader supposed to draw from that?
In addition, there is the matter of verifiability. Every letter listed on the right hand side of an → in this long list really constitutes an independent claim, so by Wikipedia standards each and every one of these needs to be sourced. 95.199.143.153 (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1. Explain article contents, and 2. Source article contents
Talk:Power

message: I added a "fiction" section to better deal with the uses of power meaning magical powers and superhero powers.  I've recently done a hundred or so disambiguations on power, and maybe 10% referred to those sorts of power.  This section might be pushing NPOV, because some might consider it a condemnation of their religion or magical practices as ficticious...?  I think it's okay as it stands, but if someone thinks it should be reworded, go ahead, just please don't leave out magical powers entirely, because it makes the disambig page more complete.  - Stillnotelf 03:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power in Fiction 

message: Please see Talk:Power (physics)#Merge from Power (disambiguation)#Physics, and explain any suggestions or objections there. --TantalumTelluride 00:53, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! That's an intimidating link. --TantalumTelluride 00:54, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Power (physics) 

message: tjtus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.207.227.145 (talk) 20:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  gfjm \ 

message: Can we say energy crisis as power crisis?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.137.183 (talk) 14:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power 

message: Can someone add a section of links to math articles? Mainly exponentials and power sets.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.126.207.212 (talk) 19:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, partially anyway.202.180.108.82 (talk) 23:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics 

message: Power in a philosophical sense seems like a broader and deeper topic than power in a merely political or social sense, as the existing topic pages appear to discuss.
Starchild (talk) 12:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree that power as a philosophical principle deserves its own Wikipedia entry 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Powah.  You might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.
: Originally Powah redirected here, bots moved it, and that resulted in it being nominated for deletion.  Mathiastck (talk) 01:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's listed at https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/powah as an Eye dialect spelling of power. Mathiastck (talk) 01:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powah listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I've added Electricity to the top of the list, as that is one of the most common things people mean when they talk about "power". Anyone who has watched Jeremy Clarkson will also be familiar with the use of power in relation to motor vehicles - engine power - which should be added to the list although I'm unsure of the best place to do so. Thryduulf (talk) 10:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electricity and motor vehicles
Talk:Indian Placement Program

message: Several lawsuits are now ongoing regarding sexual abuse of children in the program, particularly from the Navajo Nation. For example, http://fox13now.com/2016/03/24/lds-church-named-in-lawsuit-alleging-sexual-abuse-of-navajo-children-in-foster-program/ reports on a recent case. 208.163.133.252 (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about the sex abuse claims? 

message: It says "1947-2000."  We all know this program didn't have legs until the 60s and lost its legs in the 70s.  Yes, there was an informal program with ONE student in 1947, and it sounds like Spencer W Kimball, in keeping with his penchant for all things Native American, was already keeping an eye on that one student, but it didn't become a program until 1954.  The program eventually peaked in '72 with ~5000 students, then began its decline because of both nativist political pressure and the increasing quality of reservation schools.  Ironically, it may have been the US government's investigation and subsequent blessing in 1977 that made it socially unpopular and sealed its fate.  All I'm saying is that it was a real bell curve, and casually saying it was a thing when it was 3 deviations above or below its mean is a little generous.  That's like saying the abacus was in use from 6,000 BC to 2016.  I mean, I guess so.  But more appropriate than the current wording would be a line like "Although the program became official in 1954 and some students remained even up until the mid 1990s, the vast bulk of students participating were in the 1960s and 70s." Thoughts? --Mrcolj (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates are too broad 

message: I removed content that was only supported by Scribd, as that may be an unreliable source and contain copyright violations (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 51#Scribdlinks.) If an editor wants to readd the content, please use a reliable source. Thanks, Bahooka (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scribd references
Talk:Morissettian irony

message: Please see Talk:Morissettian irony/Delete to discuss whether this page should be deleted. 
I've rewritten this page to my personal taste, with the thought that it should be moved to Ironic_(song). Those following the discussion in VfD will probably wish to view the previous edit, which is
04:08, 11 Jan 2004 by 67.116.60.230
Dpbsmith 22:09, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Transformation

message: It all started when stormy night a girl came she felt weird after that she came to the camera computer in her then she felt it her heartbeat for a sec then her shoes ripped off to refill a mouses then her arms begin to fall out of her to feel computer like us then her head morphed into a square and before she knew it she was a computer 68.191.76.148 (talk) 01:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human
Talk:12 steps

message: Is there such a thing as an atheist 12 Steps Program? It would be kinda hard for someone who doesn't believe in god to do all those steps. --Arm
It depends on how you interpret higher Power and such terms.
Alcoholics Anonymous has helped some atheists, but not others.
See also Rational Recovery.
-- Toby Bartels 23:38, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: ... or SMART Recovery . -- 145.254.53.57 14:58, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)

text: ...or Men/Women for Sobriety . AA is the only addiction recovery group I am aware of which requires a belief in god (don't let that "higher power" or "as you understand Him" bit fool you) to work their program. I speak from experience when I say it is very difficult for an agnostic or an atheist to use. However, outside of the larger urban areas where there is a population density great enough to support a variety of types of approaches, AA/NA/CA may be the addict's only option. This is a very interesting read. Denni 19:07, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I miss the copyright notice. Did AA really grant permission to quote the twelve steps in Wikipedia? -- 145.254.53.57 14:58, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The AA copyright is disputed as these steps are widely in public domain. No decision to remove as copyright after 7 days on Wikipedia:Possible copyright infringements - copyright warning removed - Texture 19:03, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Widely in public domain?  When was this dedicated to the public domain? If this was originally published in 1939, and there was a copyright notice, and it was renewed, then it's still copyrighted.  If there was a copyright notice, and it wasn't renewed, then it is in the public domain.  If it was published without notice, then it's public domain.  Was there a copyright notice on the original publication?  Anthony DiPierro 19:37, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)

text: OK, according to this admittedly unofficial source, the copyright on the original edition of the book was never renewed. Anthony DiPierro 19:45, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Automation

message: I am not up for the task of providing all the sources that would be needed to properly argue that, technology is not only at the point where machine can perform any tasks a human can (one example that surprises some people is impregnation and birthing a human), but is also capable of doing things which humans cannot do. Feel free to suggest specific examples to prove me wrong and I’ll address each with a source or sources that prove otherwise. The accurate statement would be, the limitations of automation is not that the technology isn’t capable, it’s capable but doesn’t provide any benefit and/or creates negative effects (typically it’s more expensive). Also, under the Paradox of Automation section,  Lisanne Bainbridge didn’t thoroughly investigate, if she had she would have learned that a.i. is capable of recognizing errors and will adjust. The example with the airplane is pretty weak, because you can reverse the roles, pilots make fatal mistakes too and that’s where an a.i. could come in. I believe people are too focused on comparisons and not focusing on the balancing through cooperation. Creatives that see a.i. as a tool or a collaborator are not only still making money but are doing so with less investment in time. Dyer Debate (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limitations Section
Talk:Jewish diaspora

message: Claiming what is now Israel/Palestine is the "ancestral home" of Jews is pure Nazi-level racial superiority BS.  It should be worded, "when Jews were exiled from the Levant" or something like that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:449:4300:980:A900:C3C5:D2C0:9485 (talk) 12:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

message: Please remove “ Arabs” 
Central Europeans for the Ashkenazim and Hispanics and Arabs for the Sephardim)
My request: Please remove Arabs. This is incorrect information.
Sepharadim are Jewish from Spain, Portugal and not Arabs.
There were muslims Arabs in Spain who left during the inquisition but they were not Jewish. 84.229.209.50 (talk) 20:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. M.Bitton (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 December 2023 

message: Why the number of entire world Jewish population in more ancient time events such as: 1) the time of the Babylon conquest; 2) the time of Cyrus the Great decree; 3) the time of Alexander the Great conquest; 4) the time of Roman empire conquest; 5) the time of the Second Temple destruction; is not given in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jewish_population? 2601:19B:1:7B20:C0D8:3F12:E90:2700 (talk) 17:48, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't answer my question. 2601:19B:1:7B20:C0D8:3F12:E90:2700 (talk) 20:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question re Historical Jewish population article  

message: Change word "negativce" to "negative". Source is Citation 8. Vondangle (talk) 14:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Jamedeus (talk) 15:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 April 2024