lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WFZX

message: Please undo revisions that indicate this station is now on the air. It has not launched. This page should correctly show that the station will soon be broadcasting a Soft Rock format. It is currently off the air.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.61.198.236 (talk) 01:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is why Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and should not predict future events.  Also, the statement that it is unusual for an AM station to have an FM translator is no longer true.  FCC policy is strongly endorsing this approach since last year, and they are becoming significantly more common.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 19:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Locally, there are no indications that the station will ever be launched. There is some (unverified) talk that the station's property currently has a lien on it. At this time, WSYA serves only as a repeater for WTDR. FM translator W282BD has been off the air since May 2008, and W256BH has never signed on.Arob22 (talk) 04:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This station is not launched
Talk:Anston

message: Does not need own article, North Anston is already a section. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't understand why this (Suth anston ?) was pulled away from the Anston article which rightly contained both North and South Anston as geographically conjoined parts of Anston, and as the civil parish of North and South Anston. The best approach I think would be to revert the changes in Anston (which would add back South Anston), and send the Suth anston article for deletion. Acabashi (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with Acabashi, the page creator asked for my assistance on my talk page. The pages were separated by this user due to the post office seeing both as different entities. This itself would not justify the creation of separate pages. Epparadox (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Suth anston]]
Talk:Rawmarsh

message: the RP pron. was listed with the first vowel as in cow. That seems odd, and I couldn't confirm, so I took it out and left only the local pron. Pls restore if I was too hasty. kwami (talk) 04:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added that and it was probably caused by my lack of familiarity with the IPA.  The problem with local pronunciations of Rawmarsh is that there are several depending on how local you are and how 'posh' you are trying to speak!  I think there needs to be an RP pronunciation that stresses that the first syllable is pronounced closer to the word row than raw - true Rawmarsh residents can then mangle the second syllable as much as they want:) 89.241.144.173 (talk) 10:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 

message: Surely this doesn't exist any more? I live in Kent now, but I went to Upper Haugh Primary School in the late 40's, and the church was a prefabricated building next door. I went back in 1992 and the church had gone. I have just confirmed this on Google Earth. Can some local give an input on this? 78.146.235.10 (talk) 09:12, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Saints' church, Upper Haugh
Talk:CobbLinc

message: I note that there's no mention of the fact that MARTA was declined multiple times in Cobb, and that the Cobb commissioners remarked repeatedly that they didn't want "those people," implying blacks, travelling from Atlanta to Cobb via MARTA - hence the lack of Sunday service and the ridiculously small numbers of routes and stops in Cobb County. Considering I was there during the hearings, I know these things happened - but I don't know of any location other than pay-per-article news archives that would still have the relevant stories. If anyone can help dig them up, it would be nice. 68.166.19.237 (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's already considerable discussion of that in the MARTA article. Doesn't it fit better there, since it's mostly about why Cobb isn't in MARTA, rather than specifically about CCT? --Delirium (talk) 21:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Market Drayton

message: I am deleting the reference to Samuel Bourne from the section Notable residents because he was not born in the town but, according to his wikipedia biography states he was born in Staffordshire at Napley near Mucklestone, to the north east of Drayton.Cloptonson (talk) 12:30, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Samuel Bourne

message: I have raised a citation need against the name of the baker whose premises were start of the fire - "D. MacTavish" sounds a Scottish name and I am doubtful there was a person of such a name so south of the Border in Drayton at the time. The only online History of Drayton I have found does not name the baker though it mentions the fire.Cloptonson (talk) 12:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Great fire of Drayton
Talk:Gmail/Archive 12

message: As a person who was constantly deleting messages from my Yahoo Mail account for fear that my 3 MB would fill and new messages would stop being delivered, the following text seems like it would be more appropriate under a section about Gmail's impact on the webmail community, than it's competition:
"After Gmail's initial announcement and development, many existing web mail services quickly increased their storage capacity. For example, Hotmail went from giving some users 2MB to 25MB (250MB after 30 days, and 2 GB for Hotmail Plus accounts), while Yahoo! Mail went from 4MB to 100MB (and 2 GB for Yahoo! Mail Plus accounts). Yahoo! Mail storage then proceeded to 250MB, and finally, in late April of 2005, to 1GB. These were all seen as moves to stop existing users from switching to Gmail, and to capitalize on the newly rekindled public interest in web mail services. The desire to catch up was especially visible for MSN Hotmail, which upgraded its e-mail storage erratically from 250 MB to the new Windows Live Mail (beta) which includes 2 GB of storage over a number of months. In August of 2005, AOL started providing all AIM screen names with their own e-mail accounts with 2 GB of storage. Another example of competition came from 30Gigs who were offering 30 gigabytes of storage, and was also invite only, but now offers free accounts for anyone." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DigitalEnthusiast (talk • contribs) 01:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competition s/b impact on the community 

message: When using Gmail with Hebrew language, the title and logo are also "Google Mail". Should this be noted? Psychomelodic  14:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, sure. —Nightstallion (?) 20:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Mail
Talk:Gmail/Archive 11

message: There is a new j2me client for gmail.  
http://mobilepit.com/09/j2me-google-talk-for-mobile-phones.html
http://code.google.com/p/gtmobile/
Mathiastck 00:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  mobile 

message: I edit this a long time ago (and it was removed by a guy with no life) because I was talking to one of the guys in Los Angeles who still is working on GMail as of right now and he quoted that GMail will probably not be taken out of beta "for a long time." His explanation was that as GMail adds new things, you can't really expect it to be "final" until it is "finally done." Phpcoder 22:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Beta"
Talk:Gmail/Archive 10

message: In the chat section, it claims to allow up to three chats, when I have had four chats. I changed it, but if anyone feels the need to challenge this claim, I can provide proof.--James Delgado 00:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chat 

message: Does GMail still purge out executables from attachments? // Gargaj 16:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  .EXE 

message: I've recently noticed in my account that there is now an advert for Google Talk in the talk bar (or whatever it's called). Do we need a new screenshot with this in? I would take one, but I have never uploaded an image and am not sure about the copyright status that this would have. 0L1 - User - Talk - Contribs - 19:08 22 2006 (UTC)
*I say no, as I had one of those the other days, and when I clicked on it, it went away, and has been gone since. --XMBRIAN 01:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot 

message: The "Google keeps all your emails forevar!" criticism appears at least  three separate times in this article alone.  They should be combined into one section.  There is probably other duplicated content too. — Omegatron 14:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant duplication
Talk:Gmail/Archive 9

message: Since November 2006, it became impossible to use GMail in K-Meleon 0.8.2 (using Gecko 1.5) and Mozilla Application Suite 1.4.x, 1.5.x and 1.6.x as they all hanged when trying to access the advanced version of GMail (I tried them all). Browsers with 1.7.x Gecko versions were unaffected (the earliest that I could test was Knoppix 3.6 with Mozilla 1.7.2); assuming that all Gecko 1.7.x versions work with the current incarnation of GMail, this would then also include all versions of Mozilla Firefox 0.9.x and up. This means that software requirements are just a bit more demanding than stated in the current version of the article.
-Mardus 10:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it Mac-Safari or Windows-Safari? -Mardus 12:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Browser Support 

message: Hi,
I've been investigating the security of the Gmail notifier. I've discovered that it receives email addresses, titles and snippets in the clear. Additionally, when you check your mail, it sends the browser to the http site, not the https site, with no option to change. There is a hack to fix the problem: http://www.wikihow.com/Hack-Gmail-Notifier-to-Use-SSL.
Is this information worth adding to the Security section? - Camacan 07:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gmail notifier 

message: Now that I think about it, the new section's example of Sky Broadband sounds like an example of Google Apps. Does anyone have more information on this interface? Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 08:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Provider branding section
Talk:Gmail/Archive 4

message: I heard a rumor that, although the login screen for Gmail is a secure HTTPS connection, the data being sent back and forth by AJAX is unsecured and not sent through this connection.  Is this possible/true? — Omegatron 13:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this is true.  Gmail sends your login credentials on an SSL connection, then transmits your labels, contacts, emails, and all other data over an unsecured connection.  I don't believe it's the only service to do so; Yahoo! Mail doesn't, I believe, have HTTPS:// at the URL's start.  However, Gmail incorporates a connection that is encrypted, accessible by changing the URL from http://mail.google.com/mail/ to https://mail.google.com/mail/.  It can be encrypted, it just isn't by default.  Let's all suggest that as a feature request to Google.  Maybe they'll change it. -- Tuvok^Talk|Desk|Contribs  03:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Both your remarks regarding Gmail security are true. I would however like to refer you to the current state of the Security section (1.3) of the original article. It currently reads as though Gmail was all https and toots this as an exclusive feature. As you both know that statement is false. Voyagerfan5761, perhaps you should change the section to read something like your above comment. --NHelke 20:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have rewritten the first paragraph of the section. I think it does work better, now that you mention it. — Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 06:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Security
Talk:Gmail/Archive 8

message: I've noticed this week that the GMail logo I've been accustomed has changed to the Google Mail one.
I'm from Colombia, and I ignore if there actually is any copyright issue on the GMail name there
Juanchito2006 14:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went to [tt]www.google.com.co[/tt] and then go to Gmail, I still saw Gmail logo and the text "Bienvenido a Gmail". I don't see any change there. Vinhtantran 02:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm in Ireland and it just changed to Google Mail 86.42.134.235 20:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @Vinhtantran, I think it checks your IP's location of origin, not which version of the site you access. aido2002 23:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in the U.S., and it's now Google Mail. 64.213.150.63 04:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GMail changing to Google Mail elsewhere? 

message: Since this G-Mail company seems to be gaining popularity due to its lawsuit with Google in Germany, maybe we could cover them a little better?  People might like to know who they are since googling for "g-mail" just translates to "gmail" anyhow... -Matt 14:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some info about "G-Mail"? 

message: Why are we writing anything more specific than "over 2 Gb of free storage" - which will be true until they go under 2 Gb of free storage. Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found that it's silly how people just keep updating the figures (and not to forget, only one by not both).  I think we need to address the issue. --Cyktsui 10:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2874, 2875... 

message: There are several instances of the "citation needed" tag in this article. Thats seems a little ridiculous since I'm sure Google has an FAQ, an about page or something that could provide a citation (I have no idea how to add citation myself and am too lazy to bother figuring it out; don't tell me how either).Eno-Etile 00:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No need, just give me the links to the specific faq pages for the specific cites needed, and I'll add them in Martijn Hoekstra 23:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Gmail/Archive 7

message: Just spotted that Gmail is open for signups as of this morning.
I added it to the end of the 'Registration' section, but that section needs a slight re-write (change parts to past tense, etc...) PlazzTT 08:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What? I'm looking at Gmail right now, and no where is there anything about "open" signups. Proto Dude 19:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually, it is. Go to the log in page, and it is right below the username password text fields. They also seem to have switched to google mail from Gmail, though I'm not certain if it's for everyone.James Delgado 00:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gmail doesn't seem open for signups, at least not in Singapore. I clicked "Sign up for Gmail", and was prompted to enter my mobile phone number. If Gmail has made signups open to all, wouldn't several newspapers report about it? --J.L.W.S. The Special One 06:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now it is - source  and  --TheTallOne 11:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Was Gmail open for signups on February 7, 2007? I first saw the Sign Up link on February 13, 2007. Then, on February 14, 2007, Gmail announced it on their Blog. Speedboxer 04:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gmail open for signups 

message: Someone inserted information on "Mainland China" under the trademark disputes section, but did not supply evidence that this conflict was disputed, nor even a reference to a source saying this. Should this be left in the article? Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 23:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mainland China trademarks subsection
Talk:Gmail/Archive 5

message: People have reported issues with gmail and hotmail. For example, I constantly get "Delivery Status Notification": failure messages sent to my spam box on hotmail when REPLYING to a known gmail address. My message in turn doesnt go through. A similar error occurs when some gmail accounts send to me. Supposedly, yahoo also has blocked gmail invitation requests. 134.121.179.87 21:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with Gmail and hotmail, yahoo
Talk:Gmail/Archive 6

message: The article seems to say that Google Paper is a fact. We don't really know this, the whole idea seems quite ridiculous. The reference http://mail.google.com/mail/help/paper/more.html should at least have been laid down. (I don't know how to reference myself. If this is to be left there at least put the reference there. Tank 12:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't looked in the article yet, but if this is mentioned as a feature it shouldn't be. This appears to be one of Google's 2007 April Fool's jokes (click the "Program Policies" link at the bottom of the page you gave). I'm going to check the article now to make sure this is gone. — Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 00:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, phew. Gmail Paper is now said to be a joke in the article. Glad someone did that (not me, unfortunately). — Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 00:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I like how the part about Gmail Paper is still mentioned as a joke, but I don't think that the Announcement portion of Product Development is the appropriate place for it. If it is to be kept, it should be put elsewhere. Any suggestions? --Entoaggie09 04:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the explanation of Google Paper at such great length necessary?  It was an April Fool's Day gag - I don't think it needs more than a passing reference.  If someone really wants to include it, why not create a 'Google April Fool's Day Jokes' page?  Demosthenes X 21:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL! The Google Paper was an APRILs FOOLS GAG!!! Gautam Discuss 19:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Paper: Talking too soon. 

message: WHY did someone remove the part I added in ages ago about their deal with sky? It was all good information, I added source and some fool removed it. It makes no sense.
Crazy fool. 80.229.241.200 13:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't a direct deal with Gmail. It was an overall Google deal, so I moved it to the main Google article. Mambo Jambo 17:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SKYMAIL 

message: How the heck does GMAIL offer so much space? How can they afford to have nearly 2.8GB for each user? Do they just hope that we all don't use all the space given to us? Can someone explain? Gautam Discuss 20:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, they've got more than one hard drive in their main office... Mambo Jambo 22:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  LOL! That's a good one...OF COURSE they do :p  ... I am still wondering how they do it. Gautam Discuss 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also consider the fact that, although each user is allotted 2.8GB of space, most aren't using that much so the total capacity in use is much less than you'd expect. I've had my account since a month or two after launch, and have an extensive amount of large email attachments, thousands of lengthy emails, and still only have used about 15% of my capacity.  DMW 14:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How the Heck?
Talk:Gmail/Archive 15

message: What exactly is that non-english text that is displayed as you are in the process of signing out of Gmail? Any translations? Been curious for months.... 137.155.205.45 03:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're probably seeing "Please wait..." in a foreign language. That's what my account says when I log out, at any rate. It's strange that the displayed text isn't in your home language; whatever language you have set in your Google Account should display I would think, but for some reason it's not. My mom has the same issue; her account displays "Esperé, por favor..." (Spanish) even though her language is set to English (US).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voyagerfan5761 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird text as you log out of Gmail 

message: When the article says "However, when a gmail message is sent to another email address of a different provider, there will be no advertisements in the message like most other email providers." Does it mean "However, when a gmail message is sent to another email address of a different provider, there will be no advertisements in the message unlike most other email providers." ?? --Do not click me! 21:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Like vs unlike
Talk:Roberto Rexach Benítez

message: The term of office of a senator runs from January 2 of the year after his/her election until either the December 31 or January 1 after the subsequent election (this last date has not been subject yet to final determination by the PR Supreme Court).  The term of office of a Senate President runs from the second Monday of January of the year after an election until December 31 after the subsequent election.  At that time, the person who has held the job of Secretary of the Senate becomes Acting President until the inaugural session (second Monday in January), which the outgoing Secretary presides until the new President is elected and sworn in as such.Pr4ever (talk) 14:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms of office as Senator and Senate President
Talk:Eirini metro station

message: This article is almost referenced and sources and needs to be improved, it is partially translated, it needs to be translated slightly more to get a perfect article.  Pumpie (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think Irini is the name of the station--2A02:587:4407:E117:516A:5C61:5790:DFCF (talk) 13:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong name
Talk:Andy Dalton

message: The information that there is a controversy regarding the color of his hair with NFL scouts is completely unencyclopedic and does not belong here. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Your link to WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC does not apply in this situation since that guideline is for deletion discussions such as articles for deletion. Sonny Jurgensen, a Hall of Fame quarterback, had red hair, so it is ridiculous to question whether people with red hair can be good quarterbacks. Apparently one NFL scout "questioned" his hair color, but all he said was that it was discussed once in a meeting. Does that team really believe that the color of his hair will dictate his level of success in the NFL? Hell no, but teams are looking for anything to discern between this tight second-tier QB group in the draft. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Key word there is "deletion discussions," which is not what this is. This is a content dispute. I'm not willing to give in, and I'm assuming you aren't willing to give in either, and since there isn't any real policy for or against this information, I think input from others would be helpful in order to get a consensus. Do you mind if I ask users at WT:CFB and WT:NFL to voice their opinion here? Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red hair controversy 

message: I have done most of the writing of Andy Dalton's page since its creation.  Most unregistered editors have been outright vandals of this article but you seem to have good faith in attempting to edit.  However, a week-by-week summary in-detail of every single game is not needed, especially since you deleted some important points such as Marvin Lewis' comments after the Denver game.  Also, objective and professional writing is a must (no bad grammar, no misleading writing such as the "career-low 81 yards" despite the fact he was injured, no referring to him as just "Andy").  Feel free to improve this article, but such sweeping changes are really for the worse.  Thanks!  Nfl392 (talk) 18:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  To 24.165.114.205