Talk:Eurojet EJ200

message: PM is mentioned as an abbreviation in this article with no explanation of what it means. 
I suspect in this context it means Powder metallurgy is used as a method of fabrication for these hi-tech components since this allows the use of exotic materials like metal matrix composites. I hesitate to put this in the article until someone else can confirm this or find a suitable citation. I am aware that Rolls Royce has explored this area of technology however. Soarhead77 (talk) 11:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PM? 

message: Why is this article telling BS about simple maths? 20.000lbs doesn't make 90kN
RR Doc released in 2009 is quite more reliabe than this fanboyism article, http://www.rolls-royce.com/Images/EJ200_tcm92-6698.pdf
its like the EJ2xx, never developped, but here its big "Name"!
regards  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.196.104.72 (talk) 11:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  90kN? 

message: Why are an odd number of engines being delivered when each plane requires 2 engines?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.91.43 (talk) 23:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is just a guess, but that's probably just the number reported at the time the source was published. Anyway, operators usually have spare engines in stock, and often only one engine needs to be replaced, not both. Hope that helps. - BilCat (talk) 02:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  odd number of engines 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Eurojet EJ200. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011160900/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=13500 to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=13500
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Eurojet EJ200. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.eurojet.de/docs/EUROJET%20Press%20release_Tranche%201%20Engines_221206Final.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150125004123/http://www.brahmand.com/news/Turkeys-ASELSAN-inks-deal-with-Eurojet-for-EJ200-engine/13417/1/13.html to http://www.brahmand.com/news/Turkeys-ASELSAN-inks-deal-with-Eurojet-for-EJ200-engine/13417/1/13.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100731153302/http://typhoon.starstreak.net/Eurofighter/engines.html to http://typhoon.starstreak.net/Eurofighter/engines.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606031448/http://www.rolls-royce.com/Images/EJ200_tcm92-6698.pdf to http://www.rolls-royce.com/Images/EJ200_tcm92-6698.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090726062329/http://ceoworld.biz/ceo/2009/07/23/eurojet-offers-its-ej200-engine-for-the-tejas-lca-indian-light-combat-aircraft/ to http://ceoworld.biz/ceo/2009/07/23/eurojet-offers-its-ej200-engine-for-the-tejas-lca-indian-light-combat-aircraft
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The reason is simple: The "developed from=", "developed into=" and "variants with their own articles=" parameters are for engines that have separate articles. The Rolls-Royce XG-40 doesn't have a separate article, and thus should not be listed there. It is mentioned in the Lead, and in the first sub-section of the article, and that is sufficient. I'm not arguing whether or not the XG-40 should have a separate article, but unless it does, we don't list it in the infobox. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 17:55, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the Rolls-Royce XG-40 should not be listed in the infobox