lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Plymouth Road Runner

message: I had a '72 Satellite Sebring, which had the same body as the Roadrunner. I noticed that there were preshaped and punched mounts for hood pins under the hood, as well as prepunched holes in the underside of the hood. Also, the fenders were noticably flared, which left ample room for size 60 tires. I think this shows that Plymouth had the race track in mind when they designed the Satellite/Roadrunner. In fact, with the aero warriors recently crippled by NASCAR rules I think the 1971 Roadrunner, with it's aerodynamic shape and the above-mentioned features, was Plymouth's answer to NASCAR. I would like to put this in the article but I think other editors might think it clutters the article. Are there any objections? Rsduhamel 03:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1971/1972 

message: Whatdya think? --matador300 21:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orange 1969 picture 

message: I deleted "and 1976-80 Volare compact coupes" & "and 1980". The Volare was by no stretch of the imagination a musclecar. Also, I'm inclined to mention purists were insulted by the Road Runner name even being applied to it when introduced; I recall derision in the car mags at the time, but I can't cite one...  Trekphiler 21:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wile E. Coyote|Wile E.]] rules

message: I noticed the Third Gen. Image only shows the car's name. It doesn't show the rest of the car, not even a profile view. Ryou Hashimoto (talk) 19:07, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Gen Image 

message: I'm not at all sure which years it occured with, but ours (a '71 Hemi Roadrunner) came with a horn that had a distinctive "meep-meep!" sound. It is the same sound that the roadrunner from the "Roadrunner vs Coyote" animated cartoon series made. I'm thinking that this needs to be included in the description since it's not only rather rare to have unusual-sounding horns in the first place, but to have one that matches the name of the car itself, is unique as far as I know. That is a hallmark that must be included in any comprehensive description.
--Mycos (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique horn 

message: When I tell friends about the Plymouth Roadrunner, they always ask if they got into any trouble with the owners of the cartoon character. When I tell them they must have paid for the rights, because they included a decal of the cartoon character, my friends often have trouble believing me. So I feel it would improve this article to include a close-up of the road-runner cartoon character clearly displayed on the car somewhere. In the current photographs, I can hunt for the image and often find it, but I feel there should be a close-up. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 17:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There are several images of the car's cartoon decal in the Commons - Plymouth Road Runner category. CZmarlin (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'll take a look. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 19:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Showing Cartoon Character
Talk:The Painted Bird

message: I changed the German title from "Der Gemalte Vogel" to the correct "Der bemalte Vogel".
Explanation: The title is a reference to a living bird, being "decorated" with colors. The old (and false) title would mean a Bird painted on paper.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.252.81.235 (talk) 03:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does the title appear in German translation here at all?  --Deborahjay (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to be a good reason to translate the title into German, so I've removed it. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: German Title
Talk:JEL

message: Not properly completed, templates not added to this talk page with place for discussion.  In any case, stongly oppose move.  The proper solution is to merge what is here, merely the motto of the Basque Nationalist Party, with hte article about that party.  Then the three-character disambiguation page can spell out the motto and link to that article.  Gene Nygaard 01:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I agree with merging this article to Basque Nationalist Party, and replacing this article with a  page would could include an entry that points to Basque Nationalist Party.  I should have thought of that myself. John Vandenberg 01:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger with Basque Nationalist Party
Talk:Scottish Football League

message: Is this a fully professional league, semi-professional or amateur (doubt very much that it is amateur)?  Thanks ... this relates to satisfaction of WP:ATHLETE for members of the league. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional? 

message: Why is 1891-92 in Scottish football included as in 1894 and 1895 for both "years of football (soccer)" and "years in Scotland". Likewise 1892-93 in Scottish football. I would alter them to 1891 & 1892 and 1892 & 1893 except that I might be missing something. Not being a fan of the game, but I was browsing "years in Scotland" Hugo999 (talk) 06:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Years in etc 

message: It might be worth discussing name changes that will need done when the Scottish Professional Football League is formed in time for season 2013/14 in place of the Scottish Premier League & Scottish Football League as detailed at http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/aberdeen/229116-scottish-football-league-clubs-pass-league-reconstruction-vote/ obviously to actually do any name changes we would really have to wait until it has been formalised by the 42 clubs & when we know what the actual names of the leagues will be & the logo(s). (Lbarnett-bl (talk) 13:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Woah. I don't think moving the present division articles is a good idea. Essentially those divisions are ceasing to exist and are being replaced by a new structure. Wait a wee while before doing anything this time, please? Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Did I not just say "it might be worth discussing" & also included a question mark so I'm unsure where you read that I was going to do anything? (Lbarnett-bl (talk) 13:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As regards the moving of articles, surely at least the article for 2013–14 Scottish Premier League & the corresponding articles for the SFL leagues would be a simple move as they do not reflect something in the past or present, they are about the upcoming season which will be under the new structure? (Lbarnett-bl (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Scottish Professional Football League
Talk:Saxon people

message: There are pages for Anglo-Saxon, Angles and Saxons.
There is some confusion, as there is in history. But lets make an effort to differentiate. 
I would like to suggest that Anglo-Saxon is used as the default case, unless there is a good reason to refer solely to Saxons or Angles.  --Dumbo1 00:38, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Saxon, Angle or Anglo-Saxon 

message: I don't think "powerful" is a particularly useful term in this connection. I can see what is meant, because they "conquered" Britain, but they didn't really do it together, but rather piecemeal. They weren't united as such, but had a kinship of language and culture. Rome was a "powerful" empire, because it wielded power as a unit, but the Saxon people did not wield power as a unit, nor did they project power (or try to). Ben Nevis 09:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large and powerful 

message: They are first mentioned by the geographer Ptolemy as a people of southern Jutland and present-day Schleswig-Holstein
The map of Ptolemy is lose, the map of Ptolemy today is a reconstruction by a new coast line. Haabet 07:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: mistake
Talk:Yayoi Kusama

message: The only available free photo to use is an LV wax figure.  Can I use it in the lead infobox? Viriditas (talk) 22:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Added.  Please address any objections to using this image here. Viriditas (talk) 22:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  LV wax figure 

message: The article does a good job of listing many of Kusama's more notable works, but the exhibition list remains non-updated, and lacking some of her more modern artworks. Exhibitions like her Berlin 2021 exhibition, the first of hers in Germany, and her 2022 Washington D.C. infinity rooms are excluded from the list of exhibitions. Despite the great historical accounts of her exhibitions, adding her notable recent works would show Kusama's continuing fame and relevancy which the article states.  Amb015 (talk) 15:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates on Exhibition List
Talk:Folk devil

message: There is no German word like "Volksteufel", appropriate terms for folk devil could perhaps be (in a sociological meaning) "Außenseiter" (outsider) or "Sündenbock" (scapegoat). Who put this very bad translation into the article? - Andreas 05:28, Sept 14, 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.233.218.135 (talk) 15:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Volksteufel?

message: I removed the To Catch a Predator reference, because it made no sense in the context of this subject. Folk devil refers to a group that is maligned as criminal, not an actual group of criminals. Snookumz (talk) 02:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Pedophiles and child molesters (or sexual predators, which is a more general term: predators do not necessarily target children) are never distinguished from each other in popular use, but they are not the same group (even though there is considerable overlap, of course). Pedophiles are a group that is collectively maligned as criminal, although not all of them are criminal (contrary to what Snookum states), therefore they fit the definition. The removal of this example from the article was totally unjustified. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 18:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed To Catch a Predator reference 

message: Beyond folk devil resistance: Linking moral panic and moral regulation (July 2011)
The Drug Addict as a Folk Devil (1977)
Mobilization Through Interpellation : James Bulger, Juvenile Crime and the Construction of a Moral Panic (1997)
Deviance "Down under" or How a Deviance Assignment Became a "Folk Devil" (Oct 1993)
Slartibartfastibast (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional references
Talk:The People's Voice

message: I removed the following paragraph:
By way of contrast as of 25 January 2004, a petition, opposing concessions to the Palestinian Authority and/or the creation of a Palestinian state, sponsored by the Women in Green has collected over 350,000 signatures.
This is irrelevant. The People's Voice is a full plan. The WiG petition is specific, so it's much easier to collect votes for it. Basically, that's just like saying "500 signed a petition for justice to Mr. John Doe junior in his quarral against his neighbor. In contrast 1000000 signed a petition for World Peace". That's just comparing apples and oranges. Gadykozma 20:32, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green 

message: Interesting in the context: Richard Silverstein's article on Comment is Free:  The Right to Discriminate. A new bill in the Knesset seeks to perpetuate discrimination against Israel's Arab citizens. 
...Last week, the Israeli Knesset passed, on first reading, the Jewish National Fund bill which allows the JNF to refuse to lease land to Arab citizens. ,,, One of those voting Yes was Ami Ayalon, recent candidate for Labour party leader and partner with Sari Nusseibeh in a dialogue seeking Israeli-Palestinian peace.
Richard's blog LeaNder 22:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The JNF is basically a private (london registered) company, created by Jews and for Jews. It has a complex relationship with the state of Israel, including legal status issues. If the law dealt with "state owned lands" ("Admot Medina") it would be clear discrimination, here it can also be viewed as my right to do as I wish with my private land, so the issue is not as simplistic as Richard Silverstein's claims. DGtal (talk) 12:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ami Ayalon 

message: A new internet TV station called the people's voice was started up recently see here. Is this worthy of its own article? G-13114 (talk) 19:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV station 

message: Does anybody know what the current state of this initiative is?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apokoiteo (talk • contribs) 04:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What now?
Talk:HMS Indomitable

message: Colledge only lists the two that are here; what other ships could there be? Stan 17:28, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No prob - I plan to put my new book to use in improving/checking a bunch of HMS articles, was getting stale to only work on US Navy... Stan 23:45, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other ships?
Talk:Georg Muffat

message: I apologize, because my english is not perfect! There is probably someone who will correct it !
The following comment was left in the article by User:George Cohen:
No commentators or musicologists seem to have questioned GM's having gone off to Paris at
age 10 (sic) in order to study with Lully; nor have I ever seen mention of what documentary evidence supports this date. Some modern sorces, however, have given his birth year as
"ca.1645". Clearly, there is a question mark hanging over this. Doesn't ca.1645 seem more likely?
Regarding the "Apparatus" (1690): GM says something to the effect that although his Toccatas derive their ultimate inspiration from Frescobaldi, they are not quite the same thing.
What he doesn't say, and to date no one seems to have noticed, is that he was obviously
tremendously influenced by the Toccatas of JK Kerll. GM's Toccatas reek of Kerll at almost every page: Musical figures and figuration, procedures, ideas (local, or sectional), rhythmic figures, and exact copying of harmonic sequences abound, to the point of plagiarism.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by George Cohen (talk • contribs) .
Antandrus  (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Caecilii Metelli family tree

message: I appreciate the alertness of my fellow wikipedians who, for now two times, place a stub message in the article. However, as a guideline for future contributions, i suggest that relevant info on the Caecilius Metellus family should be added to the family page. Therefore, i dont think that this one, the family tree page, is a stub and its why i remove stub notes. Muriel 18:57, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robin Williams

message: I was wondering what happened to the citation I had added years ago to the only news story which identified the correct place of death for Williams.  Sadly, far too many incompetent, poorly trained, and underpaid journalists did not take the time to understand the difference between an incorporated town like Tiburon and an unincorporated area like Paradise Cay (which is adjacent to Tiburon but not part of Tiburon, as correctly depicted on Google Maps if one searches for Tiburon). Only some British journalist from Sky News correctly reported that Williams died in Paradise Cay. 
On 21 February 2023, User:Aubernas in this edit added a statement to the article on Robin Williams before that citation which was not actually supported by the cited source.  User:Clayoquot correctly identified that sentence as failing verification against the cited sources, but did not recognize what had happened on 21 February 2023, and instead deleted the sentence and all the following sources on 8 June 2023.  I am restoring the citation to the Sky News story, which should not have been deleted because it is the only source which shows that Williams died in Paradise Cay and not Tiburon. Coolcaesar (talk) 13:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit by User:Aubernas on 21 February 2023 indirectly resulted in deletion of citation to only source which correctly identified location of Williams's death 

message: Robin Williams also starred in The Birdcage, released in 1993. Why isn't this movie cited among the list of his films? 2603:7080:2204:DBD5:D904:9AA1:2DA4:B160 (talk) 07:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is listed at List of Robin Williams performances. He did so many things that it is impossible to focus on them all, and instead we only list his most notable ones. Masem (t) 13:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie credit missing from this article
Talk:Boston Tea Party

message: While John Adams tried to reassert control of the meeting, people poured out of the Old West Meeting House to prepare to take action. In some cases, this involved donning what may have been elaborately prepared Mohawk costumes. While disguising their individual faces was imperative, because of the illegality of their protest, dressing as Mohawk warriors was a specific and symbolic choice. It showed that the Sons of Liberty identified with America, over their official status as subjects of Great Britain.
A more cynical, but arguably more realistic interpretation is that the purpose of the disguise was to redirect the wrath of the British towards the Mohawks, and that the interpretation given by Wikipedia above (sourced to some biased website) is a self-serving excuse – it certainly shouldn't be stated as a proven fact in Wikipedia's voice. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 23:40, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The British army was in charge of dealing with the Mohawk warriors, and it knew that none lived anywhere near in Boston.  Rjensen (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Why did any Mohawk have to live close nearby? People are mobile. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 20:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mohawk costumes 

message: Please change "reported by the British East India Company worth £9,659 worth, or $1,700,000 dollars in today's money. [69] The owner of the two of the three ships was William Rotch" to "reported by the British East India Company worth £9,659, or $1,700,000 dollars in today's money. [69] The owner of two of the three ships was William Rotch" (remove redundant "worth" and extra "the") HeyChad (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks! ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2021 

message: Throughout the page, the tea itself is only referred to as being stored in Tea Chests, but would it not have made more sense for tea to have been shipped in Tea Brick form for the transatlantic voyage? I cannot currently look for sources that indicate one method or the other was used.
192.77.12.11 (talk) 06:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loose Leaf or Compressed Brick Tea? 

message: When did it happen 98.24.125.213 (talk) 18:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Boston Massacre took place in 1770. Why do you ask?Dimadick (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boston Massacure 

message: The exact same quote from John Adams is used, three paragraphs apart. I can only think it was added a second time by someone who didn't really read the article. I have no opinion which one should be kept, but one of them should be eliminated. · rodii · 13:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Adams quote
Talk:Cosmotheism/Archive 2

message: But for now, their probably a good idea. And while I clearly defer to Pauls greater knowledge on this subject (even in your criticisms of him, you clearly aknowledge his familarity with Peirces Cosmotheism) I say the more the merrier when it comes to the voices in this talk, and the editors of this page. I think in the end that will help us to provide a well rounded and fair (I think the mention of tax dodging would be best on peirces page, for example) portrayal of this clearly controvercial (despite being equally obscure!) subject. Religious issues are often dificult and heated on the wiki, but that doesn't mean we can't win thru against the POV and provide the reader with an accurate description of ANY given subject. :) Cheers, Jack 02:07, 14 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Lets '''ALL''' work hard to get those disputes off this page

message: A preemptive warning to Mr. Vogel: If you must respond line-by-line, then copy the comments to which you wish to respond, then add your thoughts to the copy; do not alter the originals by interspersing your rebuttals. Talk pages are supposed to stand as permanent, unified records of conversation relating to the article; they are not mailing lists or Usenet discussions, so the conventions are very different. Indenting of comments exists so that a reader, upon arriving at this page for the first time, can immediately determine who is saying what, who is responding to whom, and when the various comments were made. This has been tested and proven to work very well. Your habit of carving up others' comments and interspersing your responses, thereby removing all hierarchy and layout from the discussion, wrecks this carefully thought-out system; when you do this, it becomes inordinately difficult to follow the flow of the conversation if the reader is not watching every change. If you do not stop it, you will be reverted like any other vandal.  —MIRV (talk) 04:00, 14 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cut-up comments (again)

message: now that the article is looking so much better, who is disputing what? I want the headers to go. Jack 02:02, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Mr. Vogel's comments here and elsewhere have convinced me that he won't be satisfied until he turns this article into a proselytizing tract for his poisonous racist ideologies.  I'd like the headers removed too, but. . . perhaps you have some method for carrying on intellectual argument with religious fanatics? — No-One Jones (talk) 02:05, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  why do we still need dispute headers?