lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kim Yong-il

message: Is Kim Yong-il related to Kim Jong-il and Kim Il-Sung? The article on Kim Il-Sung notes that he had a child with his second wife, and lists the name of that child as Kim Yŏng-il. Is this name a different transliteration of Kim Yong-il, or is it a different person entirely? It is entirely possible that the man described in this article simply shares a common family name, and is not actually related to other prominent members of the government. Either way, it should be explicitly stated in the article.
--Azriphael 16:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Kim (Korean name), roughly 20% of the population of South Korea shared the surname in 1985. My guess is that it is just a coincidence. Evil Monkey - Hello 03:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I think clarification is very important, given that news articles are currently reporting that possible successions after Kim Jong-il's eventual death will be affected by the strength of the Kim family (meaning the family of Kim Jong-il). Apparently his family wields a lot of political power due to the cult of personality around Jong-il and his father. So it's an important question: are the 3 most powerful people in North Korea (all with family name 'Kim') related (that's Kim Jong-il, Kim Yong-il, and Kim Yong-nam)? It'll be especially relevant if there's a power struggle. ...CIA Fact Book doesn't mention anything. Complex.confusion (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with other members of the DPRK government 
Talk:Leo Rosten

message: This article does not state what discipline he was in as an academic... Squidface tony (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Rosten's Maxim too obscure? "First-rate men hire first-rate men; second-rate men hire third-rate men." (1970) These days his specific 'men' is often replaced with 'people' but the basic observation remains. Wyvern (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotations
Talk:Leonard Carmichael

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: {| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%; background:none;"		This article was created or edited as part of the Smithsonian Institution Archives Edit-a-thon! This event focused on Smithsonian history! Please assume good faith about the edits made, as the editor who contributed recently to this article may be a newbie! Thanks, and you can learn more about the event here!
Sarah (talk) 16:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This article was edited as part of the SIA edit-a-thon!
Talk:Pardis

message: The coordinates in the article are way, way off. Anyone have anything more accurate? Google Maps resolution is too low for me to spot Pardis..--Commking 02:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to Pardis (disambiguation). Shearonink (talk) 08:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: Does anyone object to this article being re-named?  The only city Wikipedia articles I have found that don't have the country as part of the title are well-known large/capital cities like New York City, Paris, London, New Delhi, Tehran and so on.  This is a small city/development that only has a population of a little over 25,000 and seems to be regarded as something of a exurb of Tehran.Shearonink (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-naming
Talk:Leptotyphlopidae

message: Please delete this page, the article has been moved to Blind Snakes to provide a larger, more convient article. Thank you.
§→Nikro 06:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a taxonomic entry. The article Blind snakes is in fact a paraphyletic taxon article and so cannot include a taxobox. I am afraid you may need to make that article clearer and the taxobox on that article may need to be removed. Shyamal 15:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On a further point you may need to merge content from Blind Snakes to Blind snake since this is the correct article naming convention, plus the article already exists as a disambiguation page. Shyamal 15:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete 

message: Dear writer/editor.
I was wondering if you could enter whether these snakes are venomous or not, either in the/a general info section, e.g. where you describe the anatomy (even some dentition features), or in a section/legend at the side, perhaps estimating how venomous or what type of venom it uses, if it is venomous. It may be that part of the taxonomic, 'Leptotyphlopidae' definition explains this and you just aren't bothering to repeat the definition. If your anatomy description is a repeat/part of this snakes definition, I would have thought it worth just mentioning that it is/is not venomous. If your anatomical observations are additional to being specifically family/species definition, then I'd have still thought it worth mentioning, especially for a wider audience (isn't this a key question people ask about a snake?). It may seem obvious to a specialist (especially when you mention that there are no teeth on the top jaw and I think all venomous snakes only have upper jaw fang or fangs). Any thoughts?
Sceppy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.13.10 (talk) 12:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further key info
Talk:Anilius

message: The name of Helison Marketing Ltd certainly derives from Helium. Helison Production spa (daughter of Sonatrach and Linde, Germany) produces Helium in Skikda Algeria, transports it to Berre near Marseille and sells it to Linde and other technical gas suppliers in Europe. --Helium4 (talk) 10:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helison - also a company name
Talk:Corallus

message: Would anyone mind if this page were to be moved to "Corallus"? I have no doubt that the current name will eventually make an excellent disambiguation page. --Jwinius (talk) 08:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal
Talk:Pedro Santana

message: I deleted "After being defeated in the elections of 1848, he reluctantly handed over the presidency to Manuel Jiménes, only to overthrow him by force less than a year later.". Santana did not loose elections in 1848. He resigned and after that Congress elected Jimenes as president.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.227.34.155 (talk) 15:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

message: Fjvbjv 177.52.221.242 (talk) 16:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gfh
Talk:Holman Correctional Facility

message: When I last worked on this article I marked it as being in an unincorporated area, but checking the 2020 Census block map of Atmore, Alabama proves this facility is in Atmore now. I need to check when Atmore annexed the land.
By census:
* 2020 Census - Holman in Atmore
* 2010 Census: Index Map: 1 (prison area), 2, 3, and 4
* 2000 Census: Index and pages 1, 2, 3, and 4 - The prison area is not in the city limits. This means the annexation took place between 2000 and 2010.
* 1990 Census: Index: Atmore is on page 13, detail E. Prisons are on page 8 (used page 7 to guide)
WhisperToMe (talk) 14:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Atmore annex this facility?
Talk:Danone International Prize for Nutrition

message: A redirect I placed to Groupe Danone was reverted on the ground that the article is not about the company. However, the prize seems not to be very notable. 101 unique Ghits, most of which press articles and CVs of people who claim to have won it. Ohconfucius 02:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I still feel it is better to keep separate -- strictly it is awarded by an independent Foundation, not the Company. Thre will be more publicity when the next Prize is given in July 2007. If it is merged then it won't show up under the necessary Categ:Science and Engineering Prizes. Any comments? --mervyn 12:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: *Can't say I agree. It is common practice for corporations to promote the corporate brand in this way. Danone is a mass producer of processed foods which wants to be portrayed as a health-oriented company. What better way than to set up an institute for study into the beneficial effects of the types of food which it produces? We should not swallow the publicity about the independence of this establishment - it wears the Danone brand name, and the management knows on which side their bread is buttered. If it was truly independent of Danone, it would probably be called the "Antoine Riboud Institute International" or somesuch. There appear also to be few reliable and independent sources to support the content of the article, meaning it could well fail WP:A. I would contend that this is therefore an extension of Danone corporate communications, and the prize is a best case redirect to Danone Institute International, and a worst case redirect to Groupe Danone. Ohconfucius 07:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer to keep it separate pending any other viewpoints, but don't have a strong feeling about it. --mervyn 11:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Area codes 205 and 659

message: Bad POV protection to preserve a disruptive edit made by the protecting admin.  Indefinite full protect to avoid trivia sections - immediately after the admin changes the article to his liking - is way over the top and inappropriate.  See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Admin incivility and Wikipedia talk:Trivia sections#massive removal of content Wikidemo 16:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove edit protection 
Talk:Lewis White Beck

message: Ciao Fellow Wikipedia editors: Just a quick note to indicate that the article on Lewis White Beck has ben expanded to include text related to his commentaries on the works of Immanuel Kant as reference in a reliable source- The Bloomberg Encyclopedia of Philosophers in America 1600 to PresentThe Bloomsburg Encyclopedia of Philosophers in America From 1600 to the Present. Shook, John R. Editor. Bloomsbury Academic. New York. 2016 p. 71-72 Lewis White Beck biography ISBN 978-1-4725-7054-3 Lewis White Beck University of Toronto on Google Books  I hope that it helps. Enjoy! With best wishes 160.72.80.178 (talk) 23:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Included additional text inside the Philospohical Works Sectio 

message: Just a quick note to indicate that I have raised the assessment from stub to C level based upon the inclusion of additional content as referenced above. I hope that this is OK. 160.72.81.86 (talk) 20:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded the article's assessment from Stub to C level withn the Philosophy Project
Talk:Pemulwuy

message: Do we have a source for Pemulwuy being born in 1769? http://www.adb.online.anu.edu.au/biogs/AS10389b.htm has him born around 1750, http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/11/01/1067597158244.html has him around 1760 ("From the age of about 30 in 1790"). I doubt there would be a date as specific as 1769 available, but would like to include the source if possible.WotherspoonSmith (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of birth? 

message: Can we really include a photo and label it "Pemulwuy- the Greatest Aboriginal Warrior"? Clearly, it's not a photo f pemulwuy himself (since photos weren't around in his lifetime) and 'the greatest' is more of an opinion than undisputable fact. Im not usre what the wikipedia protocol is, but how about 'Pemulwuy- a great Aboriginal warrior (artist impression)'. thoughts, anyone? WotherspoonSmith (talk) 14:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo of Pemulwuy 

message: I'm not sure how to edit references so here is a link of a .edu site that references Henry hacking killing Pemulway  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.183.11.112 (talk) 01:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: death citation 

message: Numerous references in The Sydney Gazette to Tedbury at large beyond 1805. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article627808  I've tagged the reference in the article, if anyone can provide a source?  Much else of what appears in the article lacks veracity, and the reference from the Daily Mail which seems to form the basis for much of this article is unverifiable from the information given, and probably a poor source.  Unless more sources are given, I think this article is heading for a rewrite, where it deviates significantly from ADB without a verified source. --Inas66 (talk) 04:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tedbury captured in 1805 & other unreliability
Talk:Thai Express

message: There is a Thai Express chain in Canada as well.
http://www.thaiexpress.ca/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.68.130.96 (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada 
Talk:Per Georg Scheutz

message: Page name is "Per", article head is "Pehr".  Which is it?  McKay 14:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was changed from Per zu Pehr here but I don't see a reason for that. So I switched it back to Per. --Wolli-j (talk) 12:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Actually, both names are common and both names exist in Sweden. Unfortunately, the Swedish WP does not cite his full name, so we cannot say from there. Google is in favor of "per georg scheutz" (944) rather than "pehr georg scheutz" (219) so I'll leave it to that. --Wolli-j (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A list of all members of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 1739-1915, published in 1915, uses Pehr Georg Scheutz. At that time most sources (including encyclopedias) would "swedify" older names, which meant simplifying and streamlining spelling, which means that it could never go from Per -> Pehr. Thus, he likely wrote Pehr himself, but was changed into Per by early 20th century sources. Tomas e (talk) 16:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What 136.158.119.181 (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What your invention
Talk:List of breweries in Alabama

message: Someone please define "abv" percentages. Alcohol by volume? Or is it alternate beverage velocity? Don't assume people know. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 00:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  abv? 

message: The emerald coast brewery is a dead link.TJmaxal (talk) 12:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: This article has no information about when the 6% limit was first imposed on beer in Alabama. When was beer first brewed in the state? For that matter, was beer brewed in Mobile before 1819, when the state of Alabama entered the union? — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 21:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What about before 2006?

message: I don't have time to do it right now, but we need to go through this whole article and update the references to Ala. code from 2012 to 2022. Some of laws (e.g. reqts for brewpubs) have changed. 2600:8803:991C:CA00:DFB5:18A5:790C:F2E1 (talk) 12:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  need to update references from 2012 to 2022 Alabama Coffee
Talk:Light Townsend Cummins

message: I changed "Dr. Light Townsend Cummins, PhD" to "Light Townsend Cummins, PhD" - just removing the Dr. prefix. I believe it is repetitive to use both Dr. and PhD. Listing one or the other is sufficient. PhD is more informative than the prefix so I chose to use that one. This just cleans up the writing a bit. I want to stress that I am a PhD student myself, and this is not my way of devaluing that degree. It is merely to clean up the article. Mrmb6b02 (talk) 01:04, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Linda B. Smith

message: The disambiguation page for persons named "Linda Smith" says "Linda B. Smith (active since 1993), American psychology professor". What do the words "active since" mean? The article lists older publications of hers. Google Scholar names even older papers (not all of them are hers, of course, but https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0022096575901095 from 1975, https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03199467 from 1977 and https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0022096577900078 from 1977 seem to fit). --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 12:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the disambiguation page [[Linda Smith]] linking to this article?
Talk:Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis

message: "The groundwork for the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City test for regulatory takings has its roots in the Keystone verdict."
This is wrong at worst, misleading at best.  Penn Central was in 1978, Keystone in 1987.
  140.247.252.186 16:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Percy Greg

message: A citation is needed for the change in Percy Greg's birthplace.  According to Frederic Boase's Modern English Biography, page 1231, Greg was born in "Bury," consistent with the previous version of this article.  Is there evidence that he was born in Prestwich instead, 200 miles away? Beamjockey (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Prestwich is not 200 miles from Bury, Lancashire. It is 5miles from Bury and part of the modern metropolitan borough of Bury. 92.8.44.25 (talk) 16:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wilson Dam

message: The Army Corps page cited in the article says the dam was completed in 1927, whereas this TVA site says the dam was completed in 1924.  Anyone know which is right?  Bms4880 (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dam completion date 

message: Hello Fellow Wikipedians, 
I am new to the site and thought I would add a bit of information on the History of Wilson Dam. Feel free to read the article and give me any criticisms or pointers you may have.
-WLet  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WLet718 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added History
Talk:Area codes 256 and 938

message: By the time they become effective, they should be merged to Area codes 256 and 938 - should that merged article be created immediately, or should 938 just redirect here until the effective date? CrazyC83 (talk) 01:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 938 should not be converted into a redirect until the unique content and references (and there are some) have actually been merged into the 256 article. - Dravecky (talk) 05:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Area code 938]] 
Talk:Lamprophis

message: The section on captivity references  L. capensis as the most common species, but the section above on species lists no such species. There seems to be little consensus from other sources as to whether a Lamprophis Capensis even exists, or if the so called 'Cape House Snake' is simply another variety of house snake that has been misclassified. Would be great to see this resolved. 24.163.67.92 (talk) 19:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Capensis was moved into Boaedon (along with other members of the fuliginosus complex) in November 2011. Most of the information in this article seems to relate to those species (the fuliginosus complex) as they were the most frequent Lamprophis species kept in captivity. Now that they have been reclassified as Boaedon, most of this article needs to be removed or at least rewritten to relate to the species that have been classified as definite members of the Lamprophis genus; guttatus, aurora, fiskii. TarquinWJ (talk) 14:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   L. capensis?  
Talk:Lionel Giles

message: Unintentionally correct: "Victorian sinologists contributed greatly to problems of textual transmission."--108.16.230.212 (talk) 08:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I love this sentence:
Talk:Lionel W. McKenzie

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=3700. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Wikiacc (¶) 01:06, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Peter Andreas Munch

message: A reference should show how Munch's "photographic memory" was documented. It is also not clear whether he had photographic memory for all facts he came across in the Vatican, or only for certain classes of facts. --Bairnfell (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Loring Woart Bailey

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio.php?id_nbr=7891 and https://web.archive.org/web/20050518063623/http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0000461. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed