lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Refractory period (physiology)

message: When looking at the page depolarization it says that depolarization is only when voltage is heading towards zero volts and never when it is not. So once it crosses zero volts it is actually repolarizing. I'm not an expert on this but there is a very long discussion on it in the site I mentioned, It definitetly needs to be fixed. ArrowStomper 06:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a moral question that we have already taken a very clear stance on: Wikipedia contains content you may find objectionable. Raul654 15:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Depolarization

message: The schematic picture of an electrophysiological recording of an action potential labels the hyperpolarization segment to be the refractory period, but the article itself and other sources  http://www.physiologyweb.com/lecture_notes/neuronal_action_potential/neuronal_action_potential_refractory_periods.html say that the WHOLE of the action potential encompasses a refractory period, with the absolute refractory portion starting at the initiation of the AP & continuing until when the falling (repolarization) phase reaches a value approximately just above the trigger voltage, and the rest of the AP from there through hyperpolarization until resting potential is reached is the relative refractory period.  UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 03:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't figure out how to edit the Wiki Commons picture of the action potential to make it more accurate, can anyone tell me how to edit that picture? UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 02:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  refractory period label looks wrong. 

message: It is confusing that the 6 items in the article's list of references are labelled 1 to 3 and then another 1 to 3.  I have never seen anything like that previously.
I tried a dummy edit of the section and found that (despite it only showing one set of 3) it had each of the references in a "group B". 
This clarified that, where the article contained "[1][B: 3]", it is a pair of references (one from each group).
However, I can not imagine any advantages in such a separation but only disadvantage problems with (a) understanding the list, and (b) editing all of its content.
202.168.33.73 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 16:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Reference labels
Talk:Democratic peace theory

message: Are we able to make an interactive map like this on this page?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.5.195.209 (talk) 16:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Our World In Data interactive map

message: Can someone please change the citations so that they don't just cite "Author Year", but incorporate the full citation in easy editing mode? It's an extraordinary hassle to try to figure out what citations are already in the article when editing in easy mode. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations are a mess 

message: I propose to merge Republican liberalism into Democratic peace theory. The Republican liberalism article is just a smaller, poorly written and poorly sourced version of Democratic peace theory. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 06:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Or "other countries" in general? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  " are hesitant to engage in armed conflict with other identified democracies"
Talk:Bombastes Furioso

message: The article on William Barnes Rhodes claims that he wrote Bombastes Furioso (not Thomas Rhodes). Due to the similarity in names, is is possible the Nuttall editors confused the two of them? Womble 16:40, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on web listings of various booksellers & libraries, it appears that William Barnes Rhodes is the correct author, but that some early (possibly pirated) copies say Thomas Barnes Rhodes.  I've noted this discrepancy in my new version of the article. Davepape 04:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bearskin Airlines

message: Four notable curlers were in a recent accident. Al Hackner, Rick Lang, Krista McCarville, and Ashley Sippala with an injury to Rick Lang.--96.55.104.236 (talk) 22:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The curlers are notable but the accident is not. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be covered in their pages but it is not a notable aviation accident just because some people were on it that have Wikipedia articles. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines/page content#Incidents and accidents and Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked and as of 9 March 2020 the only one of the curlers articles that mentions it was Rick Lang. Wasn't important enough to be in the other three articles. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable accident
Talk:Toy Story 2

message: From what I recall, Joan Cusack (who voices "Jessie" in the film) has been regarded as a starring cast member in the middle two films. According to interviews and extras from the Toy Story 2 DVD, Joan Cusack more recorded lines than Tim Allen himself, and her character appears more frequently. I think that someone should add "Joan Cusack" to the starring section of the infobox. --Daniel.Nemitz (talk) 02:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The poster shows only the two names. That is who the production considers starring, it is not our role to say they are wrong. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn’t Joan Cusack a starting cast member? 

message: The article contained this sentence: "John Lasseter and Lee Unkrich both have cameos as the blue and red Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Robots." The claim was unsourced, so I removed it. It's possible this is mentioned in the credits of the film, but I'm not sure. Wafflewombat (talk) 05:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameos
Talk:Socialist Propaganda League of America

message: The original text of this article was authored by Tim Davenport for the Early American Marxism page at the Marxists Internet Archive. The article is reprinted under the terms of the Creative Commons license. I've made only minor revisions for clarity. 
* Tim Davenport explains his project here: http://www.marxists.org/subject/usa/eam/frame3.html
* The MIA's Creative Commons documentation can be found here: http://www.marxists.org/admin/legal/cc/by-sa.htm
DJ Silverfish 16:58, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the "useful idiot" cross ref.  Even taking the premise of the page as based on some fact, the it hardly applies to revolutionairies. 
DJ Silverfish 19:10, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "useful idiot"
Talk:Dance Music Hall of Fame

message: Who or what is the Dance Music Hall of Fame? Jahsonic 16:58, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Where is or was it located? 76.126.35.84 (talk) 06:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Gelati

message: Gelati is different than gelato, though in the original Italian the word "gelati" is actually the plural of "gelato". It is a layered mix or parfait of water ice and ice cream (typically soft-serve or frozen custard). This misnomer appears to have originated in the East Coast of the US (perhaps on the Jersey Shore), but is beginning to spread as locations serving water ice gain popularity. Rita's Water Ice makes gelati and refer to it on their webpage, under products and promotions, at ritasice.com
*Until you cite sources, I am reverting this page back to the version of 22 September 2004: a redirect to Gelato. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 17:48, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Upper Deck Company

message: this article needs work, and more history, it is pathetic at this point
Please feel free to contribute. --malber 14:47, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Something more descriptive about this series would be appreciated. --malber 19:24, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 NBA Exquisite series 

message: I think incorporating this material in to the article is a great idea. I've been meaning to create sub-sections in this article on the different divisions of Upper Deck. However, 2004 Upper Deck NBA Exquisite Basketball needs an extreme makeover before it becomes a part of this article. --malber 13:58, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 11:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger of 2004 Upper Deck NBA Exquisite Basketball 

message: Should a mention be made of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trading Card Game? The S
:UDE has has made a lot of card games before and since YGO and VS. If we ever get down to sections for different Upper Deck divisions, it would be good to list all of them. --malber 19:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TMNT TCG

message: Anyone know what's going on with the whole "Game worn vs. Game Used" section?  I just opened a pack of 2008 baseball cards with a bit of fabric in it, and it pretty clearly says "Game Worn Jersey" on the front.  Maybe the basketball ones are different?  SetarconeX (talk) 00:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Game worn

message: Provided additional citations in the marked section, and removed the tags. Will continue to find additional sources, but most, if not all, of the material in the marked section is sourced (w/ ICV2, NY Times & NY Post).  If additional sources are needed elsewhere, please specify here on the talk page so we can work together on the sources.Akerans (talk) 04:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article/section needs additional citations for verification. (April 2009) 

message: This company in particular has received considerable criticism over the years for promoting cards as an investment rather than a children's collectible, a decision that fueled the ultimate decline of the industry. (Here's an example: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1159241/index.htm)
There should probably be some mention of this. 12.239.145.114 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section?
Wikipedia talk:Featured articles/redesign

message: Right now I'm not so happy with the contents, and I'm sure it can be improved somewhat. violet/riga (t) 17:08, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, just about everything looks right except the horizontal listing under contents.  That's rather hard to read - perhaps make it vertical kinda like the original TOC? Scott Ritchie 21:03, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:No. 99 Squadron RAF

message: The article says that the squadron had Bristol Britannias from 1959 to 1976 and got it's first Globemaster in 2001.  What did it fly from 1976 to 2001?--Rogerd 17:11, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
:The squadron was disbanded in 1976 and only reformed in 2000. See here. I will update the article. Bastie 05:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What did it fly from 1976 to 2001?

message: "What would later become No. 99 (Madras Presidency) Squadron was originally formed at Yatesbury, Wiltshire in England on 15 August 1917 ..." This is only mentioned once in the article - When did it happen and is it still called Madras Presidency?--Kiltpin (talk) 15:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Madras Presidency) ? 

message: Your information is factually incorrect .
My father was a warrant officer navigator in 99 Sqdn, during 1942-1944. During that period the Sqdn was based at Poona in India, and bombed targets in Burma, including supply dropping to Ord Wingates Chindits. Kindly correct this article, as your failure to acknowledge this phase, where the sqdns air losses were highest, an insult to those who died during this period. 81.171.97.133 (talk) 21:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does in fact state that the Squadron operated in India, although it doesn't go into great details about what it did their.It could better be described as incomplete rather than incorrect, and to fix this problem needs people with access to appropriate [[WP:RS|reliable sources to make the appropriate additions.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell from Jefford the Squadron was never based or detached to Poona, the list of Poona units doesnt mention any Wellington squadrons. 99s Wellingons were certainly involved in attacks in Burma but not from Poona as far as I can see. MilborneOne (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  INCORRECT
Talk:Whirlwind (comics)

message: The Top didn't appear in TtA 52, but reappeared in 68 of the series.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.35.83.88 (talk) 23:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References List
Talk:Morton's theorem

message: I have been trying to work out if this situation can ever happen.
The situation I am talking about is if you the person with AK wants opponent B to call and it is right for B to call.
I dont think this can happen due to the fact that the pot odds either justify him to call, and if they do they he should call whic you don't want and if the pot odds arent sufficient then you want him to call. Can someone please clarify on this matter.
:This is not possible; it would require opponent A having a negative number of outs. Oddly enough, while playing with math around this, I've proven that the window occurs every time there are two or more opponents in the game who aren't drawing dead. Admiral Norton (talk) 15:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Want B to call. B should call 

message: I don't understand the comment that the player on the flush draw has reverse implied odds in a no-limit game.  If anything, the flush drawer has pretty big implied odds: he is very unlikely to put money into the pot on the river after missing, and he is going to get called some fraction of the time when he hits his flush and bets out.  So either I'm totally confused here (which is possible) or the comment in the text is incorrect.
--JMike  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.104.232.98 (talk) 21:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flush drawer on reverse implied odds? 

message: This sentence doesn't seem to flow from the previous sentence at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.77.58.34 (talk) 06:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In other words, if Brenda and Charles were to meet in the parking lot after the game and split their profits, they would have been colluding against Arnold. " 
Talk:Persian Jews

message: There were many mistakes in the articles that mentioned the return of Judeans to the Land of Israel, when in reality the Edict of Cyrus and the Persian Jewish province were in the Land of Judah. It is common inaccuracy to mistake the two. The northern Kingdom of Israel was destroyed by Assyrians more than 200 years before the Edict of Cyrus. The Israelites of the Kingdom of Israel became the 10 Lost Tribes circa 730 BCE. The descendants of the 10 lost tribes of the Kingdom of Israel called themselves as Bnei Israel (children of Israel) and differentiated themselves from the Judahites of the southern Kingdom of Judah, who they were in constant conflict with. The Edict of Cyrus applied only to Judeans from the Kingdom of Judah to return to the Persian Yehud/Judah province. The Edict of Cyrus did not apply to Bnei Israel (Israelites of the Kingdom of Israel) to return to the Land of Israel, to the north of the Yehud/Judah. The Bnei Israel remained in exile and became the Israelites of Mesopotamia (Iraqi Jews, Bukharian Jews, Persian Jews - although 'Jew' is a misnomer as it applies to the Judeans of Judah, whom the Israelites were in conflict with). It's worth to note that Samaritans also retain the Israelite identity and also identify themselves as Bnei Israel to differentiate from the Judaites whom the northern Kingdom was always warring with. Walapo (talk) 00:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judea/Judah/Yehud is separate from the former northern Kingdom of Israel 

message: The 8,500 has a source, https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/jewish-population-by-country, but this source not only does not report 8,500 jews living in Iran, it reports 0. The 8,500 figure seems to be entirely fictitious as it is not present anywhere else on the internet. 2600:8803:C7DC:2100:19C4:7134:CB66:BE64 (talk) 18:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency with Iranian Statistic
Talk:Trevor Butler

message: In sequential shows of Big Brother, Australia, Trevor Butler has been seen as one that was ‘under the radar' and of the less active type in his part of the programme.  Australia’s public has also shown little interest in Trevor in the year after his Big Brother win.
::None of the other winners of Aust Big Brother have done much in the public/entertainment realm either, and under the radar observations have been made about other winners like Ben, series 1, and Peter, series 2.  Asa01 01:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: General comment

message: Should the following included in the page? 
There was some controversy regarding how much of his winnings were taken away as tax. At one point the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) considered it to be payment for spending the time in the house, and therefore wanted to take nearly half of the winnings away. The ATO eventually gave in and did not take the money.
I recall this supposed tax rule was mentioned in press releases even during the first season of Big Brother in 2001. Actually I think it was whether being in the house constituted being paid as an entertainer. I seem to recall that the eventual winner of that series Ben was not taxed at the high rate in the event, and got to keep most of the money. If this can all be verified it should be in the Big Brother article but not here. Asa01 03:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I remembered reading about that a while ago, and while searching for a source just now, I found this PDF document: http://www.ntaa.com.au/07_bigbrother.pdf.  I won't add it as a cite as it's a PDF, but it's there.  —JD[don't talk|email] 21:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it is a 1967 precedent it would have applied equally to all seasons of Big Brother and all $$ winners and all the many cars the series has given away over the years. Question of course is what actually happened; was Butler presented with a $470,000 tax bill as that document suggested he might be? Anyone know what the actual ruling was? (Thanks for posting that link BTW) Asa01 05:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tax earnings issue

message: This entry should be deleted. It is no longer relevent. Furthermore, Mr Butler is not a citizen of Broken Hill. Secondly, this entry is a vanity entry and does not meet Wiki's notable persons standards.--Jslasher 01:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So being a winner of Big Brother, and also Australia's highest ever prize winner on Big Brother, is non-notable? -- Chuq 02:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request this page for Deletion

message: Following removed to talk. Conjecture better suited to a page on entertainers, tax rules, of Reality TV, but not this page (after all he ain't the only person the below related to) Asa01 19:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed to talk
Talk:War Production Board

message: that closed down almost all of the active gold mines in the United States. The emphasis during the war was on mining base metals and other strategic metals and minerals needed for the war effort. 
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co., 357 U.S. 155 (1958)
United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.
No. 29
Argued January 7, 1958
Decided June 16, 1958
357 U.S. 155
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. 
134 Ct.Cl. 1, 130, 138 F.Supp. 281, 146 F.Supp. 476, reversed.
Page 357 U. S. 156  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.126.111.38 (talk) 13:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  In 1942 President Roosevelt passed War Production Board (WPB) Limitation Order No. 208  

message: WPB Order L-108 A couple of tags from machine tools http://jamesriser.com/Machinery/FrankenRiveter/Gorton3UWarFinishLabel3962.jpg http://cdn.stripersonline.com/d/d0/d05ba5bf_War_Finish.jpeg LeBlond had a painted on label, I have a 13" LeBlond 'trainer' lathe with the War Finish label but it's too bad of shape to make out anything beyond what it is, after being painted over then the paint peeled off. Lack of chrome or nickel plating, only rough grinding of non-critical surfaces, painting directly on the metal without any primer, no filler used to fill in casting defects and more reductions in the finish part of fit and finish to reduce costs and speed up production. Bizzybody (talk) 02:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  War Finish on machine tools 

message: The lead of the article states that the War Production Board was established in January 1942. The infobox states August 1941. Which is correct? I've tagged them with  to hopefully draw attention to this issue. Regards, DesertPipeline (talk) 05:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contradicts itself on establishment date
Talk:The Simpsons and Philosophy

message: The "Did you know?" entry for this page uses the information about the book being used to teach Philosophy classes in several universities. I looked at the links, and all they show is that there are two universities which are offering classes about Philosophy and the Simpsons. Nothing suggests that any university is using the book to teach a regular philosophy class, as is implied by the "did you know?" entry as well as the relevant area of the article. Unless someone can back this up, that information should be changed. Chachilongbow (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did You Know? 
Talk:List of tunnels by country

message: No existe ningún tunel en Boadilla del Monte. La autovia parte en dos el pueblo`por la superficie, a pesar de la oposición de los vecinos. Por esa razón lo he eliminado.
: The above notice in Spanish says an entry for Boadilla del Monte was removed because there is no tunnel there. --Tony Sidaway 12:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I am going to add a sub-article in this article about Singapore's tunnels. Write your thoughts down here if you agree/disagree of my idea. /aranho 12:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunnels in Singapore 

message: This list seems very long and it would seem sensible to split off some of the countries with more tunnels listed into separate articles, as has already been done for some countries (though not very consistently). Some time ago we did the same thing with list of castles, splitting off any country which had more than ten castles. I propose doing the same thing here - for any country which has more than ten tunnels listed, we split that list off into an article uniformly named list of tunnels in ~country~. Thoughts? --David Edgar (talk) 15:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is logical to do that and it has been done with many other lists. - Shiftchange (talk) 23:51, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting off lists per country
Talk:Forbidden Gardens

message: Epoch Times:
*"Katy紫禁花园二月底关闭 游客惋惜." Epoch Times. 
"以紫禁花园"
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese name
Talk:Chromatics (band)

message: Covering Chromatics in Colour is like covering Meteorology in Cloud. That is why we need a separate wikipage. Www.wikinerds.org 19:54, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But the article on colour says more about chromatics than did this article.  If it gets to the point where there's too much information in Color, then it can be separated out, but why create informationless stubs when there's genuine information in the existing article? --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 22:17, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled