lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Herrad of Landsberg

message: The subject of this article is best known for the medieval manuscript Hortus Deliciarum.  Should this article perhaps also be in the Category:Manuscripts?
Athaenara (talk) 00:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Manuscripts

message: Needs in-line citations. I'd start with combing the Chadwick book in the references. MMHobbs (talk) 14:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: Hi  and  - I'm so glad you've chosen this article to improve. It's been on my to-do list for some time. Let me know if I can be of any assistance with the article or with your experience using Wikipedia in general. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Educational assignment

message: As part of my additions I will be adding a section about Herrad's life at the abbey, as well as reworking and adding to the section titled Hortus Deliciarum and folding the section titled "the fate of the manuscript" into the section on Hortus Deliciarum. Emmashavrick (talk) 18:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds great. Just in case you haven't come across it yet, I'll point out we do have a dedicated article for the Hortus Deliciarum. It might have some useful sources/content to draw from. Ideally the section on this page would summarize but not duplicate that article, focusing to whatever extent possible on Herrad herself as creator of the work. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

text: Your additions look good! Being as though there is relatively little information on the artist in general, the addition of the section on her Abbey life definitely improved the page. Are there any other images of her/by her that could be added?Juliabeatley (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

text: You've done a great job with your edits! I remember reading this article at the start of the semester, and you've definitely expanded the information really nicely. In addition, the section about the fate of the manuscript is pretty flawlessly worked into the larger section on the Hortus Deliciarum. At one point in the Hortus Deliciarm section, it is stated that the work shows a wide range of reading. Why is that? Is there anything specific about the work that tells us that? Ejunker08 (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

text: This looks great! Considering there is very little information on her I think the article looks much better than it used to. I particularly like that one of the main headings focuses on her life at the Abbess, because it is such an important part of her biography. You could maybe add one or two more general sentences to the introduction part, it looks very brief! Everything looks good though! Abarranca  22:24, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary of Additions
Category talk:Unificationists

message: *See similar :Category:Scientologists and :Category:Former Scientologists.  Smeelgova 00:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: See existence of similar categories

message: I took off the subcategories by nationality and put this category on all UC member bios. Splitting up such a small group of people by nationality is not needed, and in some cases was confusing and inaccurate. Wolfview (talk) 17:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcategories
Talk:Texas District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod

message: I am removing the extended list of congregations & missions.  I certainly see the value of an article on a middle judicatory for a major american denomination, but not for the directory style list. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  19:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOTDIR]] 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Iran-Iraq War

message: Based on the types of comments the arbitrators have made in other cases recently, I think they are likely to request more specific evidence that there is a problem with this article and the user conduct relating to it, including specific diffs, before they can consider accepting the case for arbitration. The diffs above and in the mediation request reflect some incivility, but do not yet establish problems at the level that usually lead ArbCom to accept a case. I'm just putting this here to save some time if the initiator of the case or anyone else want to post additional information before the arbitrators start commenting/voting. Newyorkbrad 01:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment from Uninvolved User [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]]

message: (uninvolved in this present issue, but previously involved with one party on another topic)
I asked ^demon whether a pattern of incivility by the same user (against other Wikipedians, on other topics, as showing character) would be relevant information for this arbitration, and was told yes, so... Please consider the pattern of personal attacks on other editors, as shown in Talk:Disemvoweling. – SAJordan talkcontribs 23:07, 10 Nov 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment from User [[User:SAJordan|SAJordan]]

message: Just for clarity, I'd like to ask that the statement at the top of the case be altered to read "Initiated by the Mediation Committee at 23:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merci.  Essjay (Talk) 01:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request
Talk:Operating cash flow

message: Operating cash flow is the same as cash flow from operations.  The equation given is more of a "cash earnings" than anything else.   The issues are already addressed at cash flow and return of capital and free cash flow.  I propose redirecting this to cash flow.Retail Investor 00:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page does not obviously deal with US GAAP. In principle the treatment should be the same, the presentation being the only difference. Martin.kariuki 10:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IFRS Vs GAAP
Talk:Round-trip delay

message: Examples
    200 ms RTT for a connection using UDP-based Data Transfer Protocol equates to a 12,000 mile round trip path length.[citation needed]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.84.1.2 (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: What does this mean and what does it have to do with the rest of the article

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 17:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: Please see Talk:Response time for a discussion on a related article. I am not sure if the two are different enough to warrant two articles, or should be merged, and if merged, under what title. -- nae'blis 00:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: "In regards to TCP communication the RTT time is calculated from the 3-way handshake by measuring the time between segment transmission and ACK receipt." - this is no longer used, instead a smoothed rtt (running average)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.108.57 (talk) 22:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  tcp rtt 

message: I've added a template for copyediting. The main problem is that it's simply a collection of one-line definitions for different domains. A notable symptom is that the article does not begin with a concise definition of the article title. Someone more knowledgeable with these definitions please help improve the style of this article. C xong (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it a bit and removed the copyedit template. The article still needs help, but it's no longer really a copyediting issue. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 21:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyediting for style 

message: what?! 84.154.0.201 (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Network terminology. Sort of defined in previous sentence. I added a ref to help. ~Kvng (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "long fat pipes"
Talk:Eric Foreman

message: Is it just me who thinks that "Although House is shown to make outright racist jabs at Foreman, there is definitely a sense of mutual respect between the two, as seen in the episode "Safe," in which House allows Foreman to use the black marker and write on the infamous differential diagnosis white-board." is pretty hypocritical? It's just pseudo-racism as House actually has nothing against black people, nor Foreman. In my opinion at least. AllynJ 10:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. That's the point of the main character, btw. House a colorblind jerk to everyone, including midgets, obese people, religious people, parents, teenagers, dying patients... It doesn't make his racist jokes acceptable (or bearable by viewers), but it makes mentionning them here irrelevant, or rephrasing necessary JanvonBismarck (talk) 18:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Racism

message: There should probably some discussion of Foreman's theft of Cameron's article; it was one of the few significant events that transpired between Foreman and either Chase or Cameron.
* Agree. That gives some new impression of Foreman. His betraying of their friendship is especially sharp when he infects her with his terminal illness to make her motivation to save them both. Also he is coward. He says they are friends in 1st season, then says they are not when stoling her article then begs her to forgive him being scared of dying. He opposes his own words often.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.72.200.113 (talk) 20:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Academic Plagiarism

message: :Note: The merge suggestion was added by User:Eusebeus at 16:05 UTC on 30 March 2008.
Waiting for the reason(s) behind the merge proposal. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 18:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Veghel

message: I thought there are no more Soviets as the Soviet Union has dissolved more than 30 years ago. So how can Veghel have them? I had a look at the sources related, but I couldn't really find a reference to them, so wondering if this is maybe a mistake. Benomatis (talk) 09:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationalities: Soviets?
Talk:American Library Association/Archive 2

message: It is always interesting to observe the self-appointed "Protectors of Freedom of Speech" trying to smash a small web site (Safe Libraries is it too small and insignificant, ain't it?) simply because they have the gall of contradicting the "toute-puissante" American Library Association.  Amusing, but VERY revealing!  13:17, 29 September 2006 205.188.116.135 (Talk)
::I take issue with that charecterization; what seems more evident is the level of frustration people with ideological agendas feel when they are unable to insert any accusation, unsubstantiated threat and NewsMax and WorldNetDaily-esque diatribe into an encyclopedia of community knowledge.  Everything we do here is illegitimized when we aren't careful to not insert POV, and to use on sources that are reliable.  One issue SL doesn't see is that the ALA is NOT the highest authority on itself.  I don't even have one bit of concern about the ALA, although I can think of more worthy organizations to demonize in our slash-and-burn everything and everyone that disagrees with us culture that predominates in modern America.  But is it really so hard to ask for a cite to the NYTimes, the Washington Post, the Washington Times, The New York Sun, the Economist, the Christian Science Monitor, the Wall Street Journal, etc. to back up a claim?  Or at we all supposed to rely on this notion there is a media cabal actively working to suppress news, news that would sell papers?  After all, WorldNetDaily.com right now has a lead story on a shadow government being formed between Canada, Mexico and the US.  Even though I personally like the sound of that, I don't see how anyone can turn to that website to back up assertions.  Where is the raging controversy here?  Why is it so hard to provide mainstream coverage of it?  Is it because the newspapers and medica are puppets of that powerful librarian organization known as the ALA?  I just find this such a waste of time, especially when this is settled policy (settled GOOD policy).  I'll tell you what, in an effort at magnanimity I'll use my free Lexis-Nexis account this weekend to explore this raging controversy in the world of librarians, books and censorship.  If I can't come up with a viable source that way (as opposed to, say, a 2 second Google News search which appears to be beyond the efforts of those inserting this questionable material), then I don't see how your comment is anything but a complaint because several people have wanted to see some kind of verification.  --DavidShankBone 19:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banning comments
Talk:Johann Nikolaus Forkel

message: In answer to you question: I suspect that most of his books may have been taken to Krakow, Poland, but I am not a Forkel specialist.--dunnhaupt 00:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Former Scientologists

message: The problem with this list is that some of the persons either have no affiliation (former or otherwise) with CoS even mentioned in their respective articles, or their status as Scientologists isn't clarified. I brought this up in a few articles; see the talk pages for J.D. Salinger, Olivia D'Abo, Soleil Moon Frye, Quentin Hubbard. In the article on Mimi Rogers it says that her status with the Church is "unknown", therefore, I removed her from the category. Alcarillo 15:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: J. D. Salinger is kind of an odd case. There's evidence he tried about a half a dozen religions including Christian Science, Advaita Vedanta, Zen, the teachings of Edgar Cayce, and yes Scientology. How many of these he formally joined I don't know.--T. Anthony 18:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I came to this talk page curious about the same issue. I agree that if a verifiable claim of a former affiliation with Scientology isn't made in a person's article they shouldn't be categorized here. Category:Anti-Semitic people has a nice set of rules. There are also some people here (Katharine McPhee, for instance) who dabbled in Scientology, but never actually joined the religion. I wouldn't call myself a former Presbyterian because I once went to a service at a Presbyterian church. --djrobgordon 23:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification
Category talk:People by former religion

message: Should we have other former lists? For example should we have a List of former adherents of Judaism, List of former Zoroastrians, or List of former members of Hindu organizations? Or would that be too explosive and inviting antisemitism?--T. Anthony 10:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening heading

message: Where is the category for former Jews (:Category:Former Jews)?  We have similar categories for the other major religions...so where is the category for the former Jews?  --152.15.102.43 20:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Jewish" is also an ethnic and ancestry designation so there are no "former Jews." Just as there are no "Former Kurds" or "Former Basque." Still there are "Former adherents of Judaism", for lack of a shorter phrase, so I'd toyed with the idea of creating a category based on that. I decided against it though because feared it'd be unhelpful and be seen as Anti-Semitic. Well that and I no longer edit here. (Although I may return, but I doubt it)--T. Anthony 02:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Jews? 

message: I think that a couple of new categories would greatly enhance this :Category:People by former religion -- these include :Category:Apostates and/or :Category:Excommunicants. Both are very similar but there are definite differences.  Is anyone up for creating them?  --152.15.102.43 20:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just found that we have :Category:Heretics -- this is similar to the other categories that I've proposed to create, but there are definite differences between heretics, apostates, and/or excommunicants. Or do you all think that ":Category:Heretics" encapsulates all of the above categories/people and thus there is no need to create these other categories?  --152.15.102.43 20:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heretics.  Another bogus category.  Who declares them to be heretics?  How is this done without being NPOV?  Its a category that should be speedily deleted. --Blue Tie 18:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Categories to Consider Creating... 

message: As being now deceased people like Newton and John Paul II are also former Christians. I hope that is not what you mean. Arnoutf 17:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Former???
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Basel

message: Added this tag to encourage others to add to the historical info in this article. When time permits I will translate some stuff from German Wikipedia or the Historischen Lexikon der Schweiz. -- Rob C (Alarob) 00:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag belongs at the head of the article, not the talk page. Moving it there. -- ℜob C. alias ⒶⓁⒶⓇⓄⒷ 22:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Histinfo template

message: Shall we create a separate article titled "List of bishops of Basel"? -- Rob C (Alarob) 19:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should! Also, it seems to me that there should be a Bishopric of Basel article covering (at least) the period up to the conquest of the Bishopric by Napoleon, and that this one should cover the history of the modern diocese. They are two different entities, although there is also continuity between them. One question that needs to be answered: When were the boundaries of the modern diocese established? -- ℜob C. alias ⒶⓁⒶⓇⓄⒷ 20:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate the list of bishops? 

message: How are bishops in this diocese selected?  I know there are still a handful of dioceses in Europe in which bishops are elected, rather than directly appointed by the pope.  Is this one of them?
The Kurt Koch article states, "On 21 August 1995, Koch was elected Bishop of Basel; his election was confirmed by Pope John Paul II on the following 6 December."  The Felix Gmür article states, "Gmür was chosen by an 18-head advisory council of the cantonal bishopric on 8 September but his nomination had to be approved by the pope....  Gmür was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI on 23 November 2010."  These give hints as to how bishops are chosen in this diocese, but seem to be contradictory (Koch was "elected" locally, then "confirmed" by the pope; Gmür was "chosen" locally but then "appointed" by the pope. — Lawrence King (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are bishops elected/chosen/appointed in this diocese?
Talk:List of PlayStation Portable game demos

message: Just so you guys know a Ratchet and Clank: Size matters demo UMD is out. SOURCE  Also the Killzone Liberation demo is now downloadable.SOURCE I didn't edit it onto the article page itself so I'm just telling you guys so you peeps can do it.
- Shamo0 02:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update Log on Demos

message: If anyone could provide a better reference site, it would be greatly appreciated. - ZakuSage 00:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I'm deleting the link to the website because it's so old, you can't get the umd anymore. heck, you may as well still have the God of War link still up there though :\   I do encourage the posting of current UMD demo sign-ups though. SonicNiGHT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.38.68 (talk) 14:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Logans Shadow UMD

message: there is not a single game in this current list that has french has a language option.. why is that column there? 24.129.235.8 (talk) 03:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  french
Talk:HP 3000

message: Can anybody post some case-studies on HP 3000 migration to other platforms such as IBM AS400?  Thanks!
~Paul C.    Nov, 2006
In other words, you think this article would be improved if it contained a section on the effects the end of HP3000 is having on its customers, with external links to actual cases? 206.53.196.129 (talk) 18:59, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not unless the additions are sourced from reliable sources and contains no spam. Rilak (talk) 08:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Fixed to use a more up-to-date link, and bare URL clothed. Guy Harris (talk) 07:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: End of Life Migration
Talk:Memambetsu Station

message: Does anyone know why this station article is Memambetsu Station (5th letter is an "m"), and not "Memanbetsu" (5th letter is an "n")? like the town and airport article. The Japanese character pronunciation in the text says "Memanbetsu" as well, and the second character 満 is pronounced マン "mahn" , not "mahm". Don Lammers (talk) 22:48, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This romanization is explained at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles#Syllabic "n". Hopefully that should resolve any confusion. --DAJF (talk) 23:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Good to know it's deprecated, because it's inaccurate (not that romaji can actually render things quite right anyway). Japanese does not have an "M" sound. The the only sound not followed by a  vowel in "n", the last symbol in the standard rendering of hiragana or katakana. I can attest to it being in use 50 years ago, as "Memambetsu" is what's written by my parents on the backs of our photos. And from the Website that's also obviously how the station still lists itself (probably did 50 years ago too). Don Lammers (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Decking

message: Currently, this page redirects to deck, a disambiguation page that has little to do with decking.  I propose that this page redirect to deck (building), which has an actual definition of decking.  Timber decking currently redirects to deck (building), so I think this move makes sense.  -Wayne Miller 01:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  --Wayne Miller 01:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Deck (building)
Talk:Octave scale

message: This article begins by explaining how a given octave scale is named. It omits defining what an octave scale is. In general the article seems poorly structured, an amalgam of material whose relevence to this particular page seems minimal (e.g. vocal ranges). But maybe that's because I don't know what an octave scale is. 70.231.137.254 01:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition 

message: Please see the discussion at Talk:Octave/Archive 1#`The' 10 octaves to discuss content to be added here or at Octave, related to this topic. Rigadoun  (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at octave

message: This article should most likely be delete as explained in the template: "no sources since before April 2008, no definition, proof of notability, or indication of concept's use. "__ octave scale" appears to be used mainly to refer to the number of octaves in which a scale is practiced, as in "three octave scale"." Furthermore, Wikipedia is not a textbook. Hyacinth (talk) 03:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod for deletion
Talk:Spikelet

message: This is a silly redirect.  Spikelets are not racemes (they are highly condensed panicles), and neither the structure of a raceme nor that of a panicle is particularly instructive in understanding the nature of spikelets, due to the high degree of modification in their parts. Patrick Alexander (too lazy to login) 128.123.94.212 01:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the redirect to Poaceae#Reproduction which has info on actual spikelets. eug (talk) 03:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Forming this page following a merge discussion from several pages; see Talk:Lodicule#Merge discussion. Klbrain (talk) 10:51, 3 August 2018 (UTC)