lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Union City, Pennsylvania

message: According to http://www.tornadohistoryproject.com/tornado/19970816.42.12 an F2 tornado hit the area on August 16, 1997 and was the last significant tornado to hit the Erie area. I probably shouldn't be posting this however because it doesn't seem relevant, but at least I have a source to verify it, but even so it's not relevant--Kevjgav (talk) 13:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last significant tornado in Erie area 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.livingplaces.com/PA/Erie_County/Union_City_Borough.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Herb Riede (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: It should be corrected that it is 23 miles to Erie from Union City. Also, the school mascot is a brown bear and the colors are green and white. Christap74 (talk) 05:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mileage to Erie and School mascot and colors
Talk:McMillan & Wife

message: McMillan's name is given variously in this article as "Stuart" and "Stewart".  I have just viewed a season two episode in which he is introduced as "Commissioner George McMillan".  Can someone please provide some sources for the first name? 98.252.35.53 (talk) 20:21, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent naming
Talk:Siamanto

message: The “Writing Style” subsection is written in a tone inconsistent with that of most articles. It may be that the writer is not a native English speaker, or a fan, but the end result is that it reads more like a publishing house’s marketing promotion rather than an encyclopedia entry, as well as lacking citations on the several claims made regarding Yarjanian‘s private thoughts.
For example:
“His works give a clear image of the spirit that existed at the time in the minds of many of the Armenian populace.”
“He was convinced that the road to salvation for his people was through armed struggle.”
Which these claims (et al) may be true, and even likely given the author’s subjects, no citations are provided, and it is inappropriately speculative for a Wikipedia article. Given that the current Turkish government maintains its non-acknowledgement of the Armenian Genocide, it is all the more necessary to maintain Wikipedia’s standard of unbiased and well-cited descriptions regarding people and events involved in that nightmare, to avoid providing other Genocide deniers with the opportunity to accuse us of our own bias towards history. Mausfield (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual tone 
Talk:Cartan matrix

message: There's something wrong with how wikipedia displays this page. There are "Failed to parse" messages all over the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.0.215.192 (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

message: The section on M theory seems out of place. It describes a recent conjecture in theoretical physics, presumably to promote the hep-th paper [1] it is linking to. Why doesn't wikipedia cite the other 160,000 references google gives us for "hep-th and cartan matrix"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.239.179.184 (talk) 21:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the arxiv preprint with the published paper. It is cited alright, so it seems legit. (Still, the section may be out of place.) YohanN7 (talk) 23:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  M-theory reference out of place? 

message: In the literature, the Cartan matrix is often defined in a transposed version. In this article, the two definitions seem to have been mixed up. With the definition for simple Lie algebras in terms of the scalar products of roots, the Cartan matrix of G2 should be precisely of what is found on the Wikipedia page for G2, namely the transpose of what is given in the example for the decomposition A=DS. (See e.g. the book of Jacobson on Lie Algebras, p. 121-122.) Point 4 of the definition of the generalized Cartan matrix thus seems inconsistent with the definition of the Cartan matrix of a simple Lie algebra and should be replaced by A=SD, correct? N.Nahber (talk) 13:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: I just realized that the two versions of the Cartan matrix for G2 are equivalent for either of the two possible definitions of the Cartan matrix for simple Lie algebras as one only needs to reorder the two simple roots of G2. (This would however not work for the Cartan matrix of B3 whose transpose is that of C3.) But it would certainly be nice to make this page conforming with the Wikipedia page for G2. N.Nahber (talk) N.Nahber (talk) 15:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent definitions mixed?
Talk:Samuel C. Phillips

message: When Phillips served as NASA Apollo Program Director, he was a Lieutenant general (three stars), so he must have risen to four-star General subsequent to this.  Does anyone have info on when he received his promotions to Brigadier general (one star), Major general (two stars), etc.? JustinTime55 (talk) 17:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the support, guys. (Surely I'm not the only one who cares about this article, am I?) I've discovered Phillips signed the Atwood memo as Major General; Wilford lists him as Lieutennant General in context with Apollo 10, which would have been close to the time he left NASA. (The naming is counter-intuitive; even though a Major outranks a Lieutenant, the Lieutenant General (***) outranks the Major General.) JustinTime55 (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: B class. I know the kings of England, and I quote the fights historical. From Marathon to Waterloo in order categorical. Djmaschek (talk) 02:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The very model of a modern Major General
Talk:The Delphi Bureau

message: Luckinbill famously starred in a "limerick"-based episode of Columbo, and this was the "framework" for "Delphi" episodes. (see tv.com) -- I have suggested "counter-espionage" as their true task, as it was set in Washington and the US, not overseas. I imagine if they were going after embassy secrets, this might be "espionage", but few vital internal secrets should be risked by storing them in a foreign country!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfoofnik (talk • contribs) 15:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's in a name
Talk:Cartesian product of graphs

message: Example: "...the cartesian product G ◻ H  of graphs G and H..."
In my browser, the symbol (the one between G and H in above example) for the cartesian product shows up as mojibake. What is that symbol supposed to be? --kazu (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is supposed to be a square box. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol 

message: "The operation is essentially commutative, as the graphs G  H and H  G are naturally isomorphic."
emphasis mine. do these have precise meanings? can someone link to them? i'm assuming that if it's not an informal (ambiguous) statement it's some kind of category-theoretic thing?
disconcision (talk) 02:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's commutative as an operation on isomorphism classes of graphs. It's not commutative as an operation on labeled graphs. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: @David Eppstein "it's not commutative as an operation on labeled graphs" I'm looking for a source for this but coming up empty. Do you know where I can find a proof? 2607:9880:1C40:22:A072:C05:9BB9:28D8 (talk) 21:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's more or less obvious. The labels come out reversed. If A is the one-vertex graph with labeled vertex a and B is the one-vertex graph with labeled vertex b, then A\mathbin{\square} B is the one-vertex graph with labeled vertex (a,b) but B\mathbin{\square} A is a different one-vertex labeled graph with labeled vertex (b,a). —David Eppstein (talk) 22:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity? 

message: I have some doubts that the "cartesian" or box product is the categorical product in the category of reflexive graphs.  Two pairs of vertices <a,b> and <a',b'>  should be linked by an edge, iff both a and a' as well as b and b' are linked in their respective graphs.  Hence the product of a single edge (with two loops at the endpoints) with itself should be a box with both diagonals.
From a categorical perspective the box product of A and B for irreflexive, or not necessarily reflexive graphs is a rather odd construction, while for reflexive graphs (and reflexive directed multi-graphs and for categories) it has a nice description as a pushout of the span AD\tensor B <-- AD\tensor BD -->A\tensor BD, where AD is the discrete reflexive graph underlying A, with just loops at the vertices, and \tensor is the categorical product.  Without the requirement of being reflexive, discrete graphs have no edges at all, and the pushout construction collapses to produce just discrete graphs, hence the corresponding operation does not have a unit.  What seems to work is the following: if A and B are irreflexive, first make them refelxive by adding all loops, then perform the box product for reflexive graphs (<a,b> and <a',b'> are linked by an edge, iff a and a' as well as b and b' are linked in their respective graphs and at least one of these edges is a distinguished edge), and then eliminate all loops.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.76.144.244 (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflexive graphs?
Talk:Mongols Motorcycle Club

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: just wondering ring any bells with the club I think personal he's so full of shit can't keep a story straight s alliance steel and cheating little punk is what he reminds me of just wondering if any of you boys know him just seems kind of funny you talk s*** and lots of it let me know keep the rubber on the blacktop it even get my bike out yet 2600:1008:B156:E4DC:0:4C:A7D8:2201 (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landon times from Alaska
Talk:Catalan's constant

message: It says on this page that Catalan's constant is not known to be irrational
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_numbers it is irrational
This needs to be corrected 162.238.217.96 (talk) 17:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that this is the connection to domino tiling. I just added something about this to the article but it could probably be expanded. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thing that needs to be fixed 

message: The article begins as follows:
"In mathematics, Catalan's constant , which appears in combinatorics ..."
But the article contains no explanation of any connection with combinatorics.
I hope someone knowledgeable about this connection can add this information to the article. 2601:200:C000:1A0:54DF:44B8:50C7:FD7E (talk) 18:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that this is the connection to domino tiling. I just added something about this to the article but it could probably be expanded. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information is needed!
Talk:Gabe Ruediger

message: It was clearly a celebrity boxing match. They were wearing headgear. I removed that reference from his MMA record. It's not listed at Sherdog, either. Bdure (talk) 18:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Jason Ellis fight

message: The Ultimate Fighter section seems a little biased to me. It assumes a lot, such as what his team mates felt. How does the writer know it "rubbed all of them the wrong way"? Did you find interviews for each of the fighters saying that? In fact, from some interviews I've seen some people in the house liked and supported Gabe.
Joe Lauzon writes a weekly column about TUF - he said, in as many words, that Gabe was not someone that they overly liked. There have also been underground forum posts by Andy Wang and Joe which said that, and considering that Matt Wiman, Corey Hill, the two above-mentioned, and everyone on Team Penn after Gabe was kicked out, I think it's safe to say that it's all of them. NasDestiny 13:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Uh. A little editing might be in order here? 194.187.213.95 14:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[Aikido]] [[karate]]"? 

message: Lots of untrue stuff in here about "eating" instead of "fighting."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.84.194.157 (talk) 23:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs some edits... "eating?" 
Talk:Battle of Wuhan/Archive 1

message: Phew.. A great event being a stub is simply unacceptable, so I massively expanded this article =P!
I will expand the Wanjialing section in a moment.. If anyone can help on expanding the references and the external links section, that would be awesome!
--AQu01rius 17:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded 

message: "Assistance from the USSR provided additional military and technical resources, including a small band of Soviet Air Force volunteers."
Were these actual volunteers, or were they supplied by the Soviet government and just called volunteers for diplomatic reasons? Fasrad 18:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet "volunteers" ?
Talk:Cygnus falconeri

message: The article keeps mentioning the region but doesn't actually mention where the region these swans lived actually is... Mehmet Karatay 21:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sicily and Malta, as specified in the first sentence. PenguinJockey 01:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "The region"
Talk:Tornado outbreak sequence of May 6–27, 1995

message: Should this article only includes from May 6 to May 19 as there is a significant period of "lull" between the May 18 and May 26-27 outbreak. Furthermore, I've considered a second 1995 Outbreak Sequence article that could include the May 27 outbreak all the way to the Pampa, Texas Outbreak on June 8-9. I had started a userfy list article for the May 6 to 27, but probably it should end at May 19 while the second would start May 26 or 27. --JForget  19:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it shouldn't another outbreak sequence article after review but probably two separate tornado outbreak articles should be created, one from the 26th to the 29th that including a deadly tornado in Massachussets and finally the Pampa Outbreak from June 6 to June 9.--JForget  17:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: From May 6 to May 18 and a second outbreak sequence?

message: I believe that according to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events), the last three words in this article's title should not be capitalized. However, May 1995 tornado outbreak sequence is a double-redirect.  Any comments? --Rosiestep (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming convention
Talk:Enigma tornado outbreak

message: Add year per Wikipedia:WikiProject Severe weather/Tornado's naming convention. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 
Talk:1929 Rye Cove tornado outbreak

message: Add year per Wikipedia:WikiProject Severe weather/Tornado's naming convention. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 
Talk:Music of Final Fantasy III

message: I want facts. Is the singer really named "Dido"? And if so, is she THE English poprock singer Dido Armstrong? It seems quite unlikely frankly, as this album was released in 1990 and Dido only became famous in the West (let alone in Japan) in 1999. Kariteh 20:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dido is a duo comprising of Michiaki Kato and Shizuru Ohtaka. Found this on a forum. Dido on FFIII? Considering this Shizuru Ohtaka did perform for Roaming Sheep, a track from FFIII, scroll down page to bottom of page it's more plausible. — Bluerです。 なにか? 15:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Kariteh 17:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dido

message: * "a selection of musical tracks from the game performed by Nobuo Uematsu and Dido, was released by Data M in 1990 and by Polystar in 1994." - Make this its own sentence and elaborate on who Dido is in the lead.
* "and was lauded as one of the best soundtracks of any NES game" - Use verbs in present tense, "is lauded" 
* "published in arranged and compilation albums by Square" - I think "published in arranged albums and compilations by Square" would flow a little better.
* "one from the Black Mages band and the" - refer to the band by their name "the black mages" not "the black mages band". Wikilink the full band's name.
* "FMV sequence of the game, a promotion video made for the game, and an interview" - make this list flow better "FMV sequence of the game, a promotional video, and an interview"
* "Reception and criticism" - call this section "Reception and legacy" only the first paragraph speak of reviews while the other two speak of its influence.
* The recption paragraph could be little bigger. Reviews of the albums are featured at Square Enix Music Online here. Try integrating that into the article to beef up the reviews.
Good article, Ill keep watch on this page and pass it when the changes are made. -- Noj r (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All problems resolved. Thank you for reviewing the article. --PresN (talk) 22:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Another great Final Fantasy music article. Pass. -- Noj r (talk) 01:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 

message: See Talk:Music_of_the_Final_Fantasy_series#Requested_moves.  SDY (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move 
Talk:Cauchy product

message: I changed the counterexample \sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-1)^n}{n}, which can't start at n=0 and whose Cauchy square does converge, though conditionally, contrary to the stated. I put the counterexample \sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n+1}} fixing but issues. It is well defined and its Cauchy square \sum b_n does diverge. Indeed, as stated, b_n doesn't converge to zero. 85.54.190.251 (talk) 12:38, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Convergence and Mertens' theorem

message: I changed the formulation of Cesaro's theorem. I believe the theorem was intended to be read in a way that would make it corect but there was a notational conflict with the rest of the article rendering it liable to be misunderstood. MathHisSci (talk) 12:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cesaro's theorem

message: I've removed the "unreferenced" tag and added a reference to Apostol.  This includes most of the content, but not Cesaro's theorem; a further reference would be good.  I've tagged the article "attention needed", as I find the notation C(x,y) somewhat confusing, and the use of  \sum x strikes me as too informal.  I'm not sure whether it would be better to give a clear definition of "C(x,y)", or rewrite the article to avoid using that notation. Jowa fan (talk) 02:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Jowa fan, I think i will proofread the article today evening; my talk page indicates that it would be a good idea to finally do something useful here anyways. Good day, --Mathmensch (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notation and references

message: User:TakuyaMurata recently reinstated a paragraph on semigroup algebras that I had deleted. In my view, this concept is too advanced for the main audience of this article: first-year B.S. students in mathematics or second-year B.S. students in engineering. The relation to semigroup algebras would make sense in article Convolution (e.g., in section "Discrete convolution"), which is more advanced, but it does not belong in an entry-level article such as this one. What does the community think about it? J.P. Martin-Flatin (talk) 11:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Who decided the scope of the article? I understand the engineering students may not be interested in semigroup algebras; those readers should just skip the section. -- Taku (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semigroup Algebras 

message: Cesaro's theorem is currently unsourced. It traces back to Cesaro. See Silverman's book "On the Definition of the Sum of a Divergent Series", p.27, Thm. J for a modern English statement. He cites "Cesaro: Bull des Sciences math, t. XIV 1890". I do not presently have an inclination to figure out Wikipedia's citation system enough to edit the article with this information, but I wanted to at least put it somewhere public. 2603:8000:A303:F8EC:1845:84BC:A5A5:6EBE (talk) 07:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cesaro's theorem citation