Talk:Satellite imagery

message: Blue Marble was a project for mapping the visible color of the Earth with about 1-km resolution. The beautiful resulting images have become very popular in the media and among the public.
Blue Marble is the name given to a single photo taken during an Apollo space mission, it is not a project.
--Abdull 11:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Blue Marble

message: Rural areas are mapped at 100-150m resolution? The Landsat program images most of the world to 15m also see here and search for Landsat. Should this be updated? How about some discussion or at least links to spy satellite imagery, which is classified but guessed to be at 4cm resolution? cluth 09:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolution 

message: What's the point of this section?  It seems to be somewhat random, singular, and under a heading to which I don't understand the relationship....--Koeppen 08:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving Images? 

message: Perhaps someone should mention that in many countries, especially the U.S., google doesn't provide any more significant photo data to the public then is already available for sale by the government itself.
If somehow intensity is increased on an Earth surface (eg. an important monument) either by using halogen lamps or floodlights then if satellite takes image the image it  would get will be a white image?? Please somebody answer.
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.203.242.177 (talk) 11:13, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Google's Intention 

message: I must say, I feel like Satellite Image Comparison should be deleted outright.  It has no sources and just two large images that make up the article.  Or are you thinking that a section of satellite imagery should say something about image comparison?  I'd be ok with that too.--Will.i.am 00:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feeling is an unjustifiable for reason of deletion.  The article in question is there for support of another article.  This article Satellite Image Comparison is justified by its content as it supports a stream of facts coming from the articles water vapor, humidity, etc.  DO NOT DELETE OR MERGE.  --Hard Raspy Sci 17:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has since been deleted. -- Beland (talk) 01:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: The mention of the NRO's capability is most likely exaggerated and not cited in any way. There are theoretical limits to the resolution that can be obtained from that far out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.255.213.130 (talk) 20:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: NRO

message: Yes, price depents on resolution but what to expect if one would like to buy images?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.197.154.209 (talk) 12:16, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost per image? 

message: Interesting article, either for inspiring content here or linking to:  -- Beland (talk) 01:49, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications 

message: I just created :Category:Satellite imagery. Please help out.
For instance there are many entries in :Category:Earth observation satellites & :Category:Space observatories that should have the category added to them.
--Fixuture (talk) 18:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Satellite imagery]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Satellite imagery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091130171224/http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/ABSTRACTS/GPN-2002-000200.html to http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/ABSTRACTS/GPN-2002-000200.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I am going to add a few academic sources to the article. The last references were pulled over 3 years ago. One of the links no longer works. I'm going to re-pull some of the sites and articles as well.Timothy McC. (talk) 15:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References