lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gakuen Utopia Manabi Straight!

message: Where does it say that Hayashibara turned down the role for Manabi? Someone got a source for that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.197.157.0 (talk) 00:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That information is from the Japanese wikipedia, but we're not supposed to cite other wikipedia pages. I'm sure the info was from some interview in some Japanese magazine, but the Japanese wiki page wasn't cited, so there's no telling where the info first came from.--(十八) 05:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Megumi Hayashibara & Manabi

message: This is relevant to the setting, when I have the time I'll review to see what year it is set in, but I remember a key aspect of the plot here was that it was at least a decade or two in the future where there are shortages of students which are causing the school closings. Tyciol (talk) 04:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's explicitly stated to occur in 2035, I believe in episode one of the anime.--十八 04:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it would be mentioned in the first DVD booklet, but I can't see it, nor from flicking through the others. I've listened to the first episode and not heard the date, but then most if it went over my head anyway and while I have a fansub somewhere I've no idea where... Shiroi Hane (talk) 22:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It should also be in the manga, btw.--十八 00:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Year

message: I'm not sure this applies here. While the manga came out first, I believe this was more of a media-mix project. Ufotable is, after all, an animation studio and the animation process is a lot more involved and drawn out than it is for manga. JA.wiki, citing a book I do not have, says that planning on the anime started in 2003. Shiroi Hane (talk) 01:19, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Anime series based on manga" 

message: I added a source to "Lucky & Happy" in the anime section, where only "A Happy Life" was being mentioned. The previous edit implied that only one song was made by her, but the truth is that Okazaki made both songs, and I also think it's important to mention this since I'm pretty certain (but can't assure) that Hayashibara-san deliberately chose both songs to pay a homage to her friend, Okazaki Ritsuko. It's not the first time she's done covers for her, at the very least, and some more references won't really damage the article.
As may be obvious, I'm not an user and normally don't edit wikipedia articles, however I think there should be no problems, since I edited this the same way "A happy life" was being referenced. If anyone thinks the way I posted this is wrong, feel free to edit it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.25.167.108 (talk) 04:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentioning Okazaki as the author of both the OP and ED
Talk:Birmingham Zoo

message: This now has enough information and citations for C-class. It would probably be a B-class article with descriptions of the exhibits and facilities, and some more pictures to support the new text. A picture of the entrance would be nice. Also, some pictures showing the actual exhibits, not just closeups of the animals. This article is about the zoo, not about specific animals. Donlammers (talk) 11:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Discovered that Bhamwiki also has a page on the zoo (Birmingham Zoo) which has additional details. Some of the images might be in the public domain and some of the references could possibly be used for this page as well. Recycle.Recycle (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional information
Talk:Parkview High School (Georgia)

message: Hey, Renegade, I understand your point about the coaches, but I think the ordeal with Tracy Crouch and the soccer team needs to be mentioned, as it was a big deal. He had just won the state championship and then was removed from his post.
That's true.  I just didn't want too much about the coaches in the athletics section.  I'll restore it until someone decides what to do with it.  I guess we should address the Coach Flowe issue as well.  ListedRenegade 02:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems the same person who deleted that bit on the coach was also vandelizing the Brookwood High School article, so I'm willing to say school bias. Moberho 03:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I assumed as well. I'll add this information back to the article. TheUnionBlood 23:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

message: After witnessing about the 10th rv on alumni in a month I'm starting to wonder if it's even worth it to keep it on the page.  It just creates trouble and I highly doubt any admin will care enough to lock the page.  Thoughts? Kronermark (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is worth keeping, but keep in mind that WP:SCH calls for references to verify notability and association with the school. Not all of the current names are readily verifiable in this manner.  One thing that might help put off vandals is to add references to all individuals, even the ones which note their graduating from Parkview on their respective article.  Improving the reference level of the article in general will tend to raise the bar so to speak. – Zedla (talk) 04:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni 
Talk:Syed Mujtaba Ali

message: I am suggesting to add an infobox --Tito Dutta (Talk) 10:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have started the infobox. It needs to be modified now! Thanks. --Tito Dutta (Talk) 10:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to add infobox 

message: Deshe Bideshe external link does not exist. The page is removed or relocated in that website. I have removed the link from this article. Thanks. --Tito Dutta (Talk) 11:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desehe BIdeshe External Link Does Not Exist
Talk:Eduwise

message: The article, as I found it, seemed to have been cut and pasted from the Intel website, so I rewrote it all and have tried to provide references.  I am not an expert in Wikipedia formatting so if someone could fix the references that would be really good.
There may well be a notability problem here. The OLPC project spent tens of millions on R&D and made a new operating system and set of applications, as well as inventing a new screen, a new wireless card and so on. This however, is a small laptop with a tiny screen. Its blue, but it is just a standard laptop.
So it may be worth merging this article into the Children's Machine article and having it under a section about "Other Developing World Educational Laptops".
Best Wishes
User:Zeth 02:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also disagree with the merge, two completely different products. --69.136.111.100 23:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

message: This laptop is designed for 1st world countries rather than developing nations so there's a different design approach (900mhz celeron compared to a 350mhz geode), it uses windows rather than a custom linux based OS so it's more in tune with common PCs. It's also worth noting that the OLPC will only cost slightly less for western customers due to the policy of using machines in sold in the west to fund the project elsewhere.
Unless the low cost ultraportables become common in which case the eduwise and the OLPC should be grouped together , I believe there is a big enough difference in their approach for these topics to remain seperate. Abigsmurf 14:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences to the OLPC
Talk:Brookgreen Gardens

message: There are a lot of pictures on this page, more than are necessary and this might hurt some dial-up user who try to access the page.  When I found them, they were in a big mess and formatted oddly, so I stuck them in a gallery, but I don't think that they are all necessary to the page.  Could we think of removing some of them? --Sbrools (talk . contribs) 15:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is rather picture-heavy, considering how relatively little text it has. Think there's a simple option to fix. I'll work on it. --Ebyabe 17:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Done! It was under the WP:NRHP umbrella, which is how a Florida boy caught this. :)  What I discovered was that most of the pix were stored at WikiCommons. So I created a page there for the gardens, made galleries and added all the ones I could find so they could be seen there. Put the more material at WikiCommons tag on the main page of this article, and removed most of the pix. Made one gallery at the bottom with a smaller representative sampling of pictures. Left the links to the sections, 'cause all that good work shouldn't go to waste. A few more could get added, but I'd say there shouldn't be more than a dozen, in any case. At least until the article itself is bigger, that is. It definitely makes it easier to read the actual article. Hope that helps! -Ebyabe 18:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia guidelines say galleries should only be used to illustrate a particular point if necessary, and not as a general image repository. I added the "commons+cat" template, which points to the commons gallery and the commons category. This lets anyone add images as needed. They just need to remember to put any new photos int the gallery so that they are actually used in an article. Donlammers (talk) 15:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of pictures 

message: * "an award- winning artist known for her site-specific works,"  from the Lowcountry Trail section because it seemed unnecessary.  Even self-serving.  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed this 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/ScienceApologist/Proposed decision

message: This case opened on 23 November 2006.  By the 29th, the workshop contained 13 findings and 8 remedies, and on that day Fred Bauder copied word-for-word to the proposed decision 12 of the 13 findings, and with a few changes, 6 of the 8 remedies.  He added one new finding and one new remedy, and Jayjg later proposed an alternative remedy, bringing the proposed decision to its current total of 13 findings and 8 remedies.
In contrast, the workshop now stands at 25 findings and 14 remedies.  Of the 12 findings and 6 remedies added since Fred's initiative, none have reached the proposed decision, and none have received comment from any arbitrator other than Fred.  Today is nearly two weeks since the case opened, but only the first week of workshopping is represented here.  I hope the second week will also be addressed. Tim Smith 01:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The workshop is intended as a way for the arbitrators to get feedback about the case.  Only the arbitrators decide which proposals, if any, get moved to the proposed decision page.  The arbitrators are under no obligation to consider, adopt, or comment on any particular proposal, although they often at least comment.  The current proposed decision page may represent the final outcome of the case. Thatcher131 03:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Understood, but I hope the arbitrators will carefully consider the findings and remedies proposed following Fred's copy-over on the 29th, as well as the comments made to the older proposals, many posted after some arbitrators had already voted.  The current proposed decision reflects a snapshot of the workshop taken six days into the case, not the whole picture. Tim Smith 05:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I too hope they read as much as they can of each case but that's up to each arbitrator. Thatcher131 08:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Second week's workshopping?
Category talk:Fictional orphans

message: Question: Why isn't Harry Potter on here? -Molly
:Answer: He's under P, not H. —Andrew
Question: I was just wondering if Teddy Lupin from Harry Potter would count? Or is he too minor to add to the list? 90.199.142.250 (talk) 22:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tony Roma's

message: User:68.228.60.192 had blanked the page for no reason - have reverted and left message and warning on users talk page. --Mikecraig 01:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I removed the Advert template from atop the article (diff). It was a dated template from 2011, and nothing exists on this talk page qualifying the tag. Also, the article was in an entirely different state when the template was added in 2011. North America1000 06:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If not written as an ad, at the very least it's one sided. They once had over 240 locations, now under 100, most of which were shed well before 2020, so the lockdowns didn't drive it. Yet no mention of this downsizing and widespread closures. No mention of headquarters relocating, and that the founder didn't approve and sold his remaining shares. Also, I recall the parent company filed for bankruptcy in 2000s, but no mention in the article. --76.104.140.211 (talk) 17:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you found any independent reliable sources addressing their downsizing, closures, hq relocation, or bankruptcy? Schazjmd (talk) 17:25, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert tag
Talk:Word of God (community)

message: How can this be categorized as non-dominational and then also categorized with a certain demonination? Seems unencyclopedic to me. Jporcaro 18:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Charismatic and Pentecostal Christianity category is a category that includes both articles having to do with Pentecostal churches (which would count as a denomination) and articles having to do with the Charismatic movement (which is not a denomination, but rather a movement that appears in many "traditional" denominations, ie. Episcopalian, Lutheran, etc.).  The Word of God community fits into the charismatic aspect of the category, not the Pentecostal.  It is tricky to categorize though, since its not a church, and members attend a wide range of churches. Hope that clarifies things. Danbold 19:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article reads like an advertisement, FYI. Howdoesthiswo 19:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising 

message: I notice there is no info here regarding links with Tom Monaghan or the Promise Keepers. No discussion of the Derek Prince or Shepherding Movement links either.
Would anyone like to work together on this?Linn C Doyle (talk) 20:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Dominos, Tom Monaghan, Promise Keepers, and other issues
Talk:Formula unit

message: Unit cell chemistry 2409:4081:1C05:86D3:0:0:EA08:8E00 (talk) 16:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry  

message: formula unit all relationships
2404:3100:1C10:8048:4289:4C7C:9319:45F9 (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fo
Talk:Earl Bostic

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 22:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Staples Canada

message: I'm not sure how to add things to the to do list, so it would be great if someone could btg2290(talk·contribs) 21:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Treaty of Balta Liman

message: The article Anglo-Ottoman Treaty really needs to be merged into this one, which is much better written and more detailed: however, it might need a historian's eye to pick out the relevant detail in the other article that would benefit this one. Richard3120 (talk) 02:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Should this be "Consul General John Cartwright" instead? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Or maybe Consul-General? Lotje (talk) 15:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counsel General John Cartwright 

message: The phrase "there would be no benefits of market inequalities that would form between the Ottoman Empire and England after the treaty" is gobbledygook. Benefits for whom? What is a "market inequality"? I can guess at what it means, by why should I have to guess? Why did the author omit so much informaton? Banderswipe (talk) 04:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benefits of market inequalities
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Transport in Scotland

message: Hello, a discussion has been started here concerning the reliability of the Railscot website for use as a source. Please contribute if interested, thanks. Crowsus (talk) 11:37, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable source discussion 

message: If anyone would like to - or be able to - help with cleaning up the "Rockfall Risk" section on this page, it would be most appreciated. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Falls of Cruachan derailment]] - confusing section 

message: Feel free to give your views over at the RS noticeboard here about RTT and whether you think it is reliable or not. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realtime Trains as a reliable source
Talk:Nicknack

message: This is a redirect page. What's the point of deleting it? The word appears numerous times in the wikipedia. If someone were to look up that word in the wikipedia, they should at least know that it's a placeholder name like many others. Oicumayberight 02:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a HOLDON tag to the page so that admins will expect to look here for your comment.  Wittyname 02:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:607th Combat Weather Squadron

message: I worked at the 607th WS in 1995-1996 and have always been curious what's new since then.  How long did Foxxy (mascot dog) make it?  If anyone has pics of the place inside please share! -Rolypolyman (talk) 22:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone have pictures?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to 607th Combat Weather Squadron.  No such user (talk) 14:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 607th Weather Squadron →  – The 607th Weather Squadron was redesignated as the 607th Combat Weather Squadron, effective 1 June 2021. The source website is only available via military network. I updated alot of the verbiage around the page, but cannot move the title. Dqniel.schon (talk) 06:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Support Have to referred to as such after the redesignation.    – robertsky (talk) 23:42, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 December 2022
Talk:Rice, Oregon

message: Aka "Rice Station" or "Rice's Station"
*Oregon Daily Journal 1905 (warehouses to be built along Great Southern)
*Morning Oregonian 1909 (weather)
*Oregon Daily Journal 1910 (incorporation of Rice-Union Warehouse Company)
*Morning Oregonian 1910 purchase of George Rice farm by Mr. Fax (see Fax Road)
*Morning Oregonian 1915 (Sam Ward house fire)
*Oregon Daily Journal 1915 (NSFW--gruesome rail accident)
*Maupin Times 1916 (grain elevator news)
*Sunday Oregonian 1916 (grain elevator news; description of gravity tank that may be the one in photos)
*Oregon Daily Journal 1919 (dissolution of Rice-Union grain elevator company)
*Newspapers.com clips
Valfontis (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: News clippings

message: *Trees and Shrubs of Western Oregon Stanford Botany Thesis 1925
*The Pacific Reporter 1913 Oregon Supreme Court case (Diamond Roller Mills v. Moody)
*Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 1955
Valfontis (talk) 19:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Google books (journals, etc.) that reference Rice Station as a place

message: *Stream gauge Fifteenmile Creek at Rice, Oregon Water Resources Department, 2011
*Smithsonian Institute, image of Museum of Natural History specimen collected at Rice Station, 1917
Valfontis (talk) 20:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Government docs
Talk:Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope

message: The article currently says 'Given its excellent optical qualities... ...it regularly outperforms much larger telescopes located elsewhere'. This is quite a sweeping statement, in fact it doesn't have a source at present  so it's currently just an assertion. It also doesn't say what telescopes it is being compared with. Much older ones perhaps?
Generally large telescopes are expensive so it isn't as if designers of other large telescopes don't also aim for 'excellent optical qualities'. A source to back up the assertion of 'outperformance' is needed, and very preferably one that explains why this telescope achieves such excellent optical qualities where others have presumably not been able to rise to these heights of optical perfection.
I'm not just being cynical. Maybe this telescope doesn't have to make compromises that others do for some reason, or maybe it was the first to hit on an excellent design which is now being copied at a larger scale. But this would all require explanation and a source, that are not currently present in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.37.175 (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: From the article: "Because it has such a short focal length, a Gregorian design could be employed which uses a concave secondary mirror at a point beyond the primary focus; this allows unusually sharp focusing across the field of view." and "The unusual optical design and novel mirror fabrication techniques mean that both the primary and secondary mirrors are among the most exact surfaces ever made for a ground-based telescope. In addition, the skies above Mount Graham are among the most clear, steady, and dark in the continental North America. Seeing of better than one arc-second even without adaptive optics can be achieved on a regular basis." This is what I think is meant when the article argues that it "outperforms much larger telescopes located elsewhere." Granted, these assertions are unsourced as well, but they point in any case in the direction of how one might go about verifying them. --189.126.194.194 (talk) 20:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Performance of the VATT

message: Since this article is relatively short, and the telescope itself is part of the Mount Graham International Observatory, it should be merged in as a section of the MGIO article rather than keeping it independent.  that would allow faster, nore efficient access to complete information about the MGIO. Log'a'log 02:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article has been expanded considerably since the above was written, I would object to such a merger. __meco (talk) 08:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: merge into [[Mount Graham International Observatory]]

message: Shouldn't it be removed?  There should be a disambiguation page, so it seems unnecessary, no?62.57.50.138 (talk) 09:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the "Vatican City topics" mentioned at the end of the article?
Talk:Heinrich Hertz Submillimeter Telescope

message: Since this article is relatively short, and the telescope itself is part of the Mount Graham International Observatory, it should be merged in as a section of the MGIO article rather than keeping it independent. That would allow faster, more efficient access to complete information about the MGIO. Log'a'log 02:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge into [[Mount Graham International Observatory]]
Talk:Dinka alphabet

message: This actually could make a nice template for other alphabet/orthography pages (unless there is one already). --A12n 02:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I removed the tonal language and Nilo-Saharan language category tags as those seem to apply more appropriately to Dinka language itself. Added some others re writing systems. --A12n (talk) 06:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 