lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:LoCoARTS

message: Google translator says this is what the article says:
"Crazy person Art. Pagina Web of entertainment.   Those episodos but known like Alejo and Valentina an made a great change in the Argentine entertainment.  You can veer those episodes atravez of the pagina Web www.locoarts.com.ar. disfrutelo!"
Astrokey44 03:30, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it should be "LoCoARTS" not "Loco Arts". If someone thinks this shouldn't be done, please say so, by tomorrow or perhaps the day after that, I'll be moving this to "Locoarts" since I think "LoCoARTS" is not possible. --A/B 'Shipper 女 (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia DOES allow LoCoARTS. It doesn't allow small letters at the beggining. I'm for the moving. Mariano(t/c) 07:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks for clarifying!! I'll do the moving now =) . --A/B 'Shipper 女 (talk) 14:59, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

text:  Move DONE, hope I did ok, it was my first move, let me know if I missed something =o --A/B 'Shipper 女 (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation and Name
Talk:Gris (disambiguation)

message: This article was redirected to Pinot Gris as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. Owen× ☎ 03:30, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Musa Dagh

message: I edited some stuff on this page because I felt it didn't focus on the significance of the event itself in 1915. However, if some feel its lacking the physical characteristics of the region itself, feel free to add that.--MarshallBagramyan 07:55, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add 

message: Is it normal that the Arabic version of Musa Dagh and its English transliteration do not correspond? It is "Musa Dagh" in Arabic while the English transliteration says "Jebel Musa". Dagh is not an Arabic word so Jebel Musa is much more accurate. --Davo88 (talk) 06:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic 

message: There is something wrong with this sentence: "The denizens of that region had been given an official order from the Turkish government where they became violently expelled from their six villages (Kabusia (Kaboussieh), Yoghunoluk, Bitias, Vakef, Kheter Bey (Khodr Bey), Haji Habibli) by the Ottomans in 1915." Anyone knows what did the author intend to say? Opole.pl (talk) 19:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: The Ottoman losses are shown between 8-15 thousand without citing a source. This seems like an exaggeration to say the least. Even if 3-9 thousand were killed by French bombardment (it is also claimed), it means that about 5 thousand Ottoman soldiers were killed by irregular Armenians on the mountain. It seems too much fanaticism to write that a few hundred irregular militiamen killed thousands of soldiers on the mountain with only 18? casualties. However, I still don't find it right to delete it right away. I mentioned the lack of resources, if it is supported by reliable sources (if possible, without the unprovable Armenian eyewitness statements), the template I left can be deleted. Kyzagan (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: After about 5 months, I am removing unsourced content. It can be added again with a valid source. Kyzagan (talk) 21:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties
Talk:WCPN

message: *Only 2,000 of the 13,000 analog AM/FM radio stations in the U.S. have converted to HD; of those that have converted, all still broadcast via analog as mandated by the FCC. Moreoever, the first HD channel of every HD Radio station is a simulcast of the analog signal -- again, as mandated by the FCC.
*239 million analog radio listeners in the U.S. vs. only 3 million HD Radio units. By far, analog is still the preferred choice among radio consumers.
*Clearly, the infobox should reflect that analog technology is still the dominant form of transmission. It's also no secret that the radio industry has been heavily promoting HD Radio; by including only the HD Radio formats, one begins to question the credibility of this article's content. Wikipedia is an encyclopedic endeavor, not a brochure for iBiquity. Levdr1 (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analog format 
Talk:1930 San Zenón hurricane

message: Nees more info on the disaster. Jdorje 07:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: This hurricane is also known as "San Zenón" because it occurred on this saint's day, according to Roman Catholic celebrations.  Dominican 22:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe you, but it would be great if we could provide a source for that. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 23:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Zenón
Talk:WCLV

message: have to add one thing to the discussion this morning's show:
Coming from Europe I see one drawback for this idea. If I get
out of the train station overseas, there are taxis, busses,
underground trams waiting in the same building or right next to
it.
If I travel by train here, I end up in no-mans land. My son took
the train to Washington last year, and I had to take him to Alliance
at three o'clock at night, not a save time for a woman to drive
around. He thought it would be fun, and he hated it for the delays.
Unless we have good local public transportation all this train 
talk is for the birds.
Love your station, love the show.
Best regards, Christine Ashby  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.253.139.190 (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railroad connections for Ohio's main towns 
Talk:The Six Bullerby Children

message: This article needs to be merged with The Children of Noisy Village as both articles refer to the same thing.  This is how the series of books is known in the UK, while Noisy Village is the title in the USA. --SeekingOne 03:54, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Both articles could be merged into one "Bullerby" article, and notability established there. I might undertake this, if I will not find comments against it on my talk page soon ;) --Gwyndon 14:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I encountered unlisted book at my workplace, called A Day at Bullerby (original title: Barnens Dag i Bullerbyn, copyright 1966), published by Methuen & Co in 1967 with no ISBN. --M.A. (talk) 08:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another book 

message: This needs to be cleaned up, just awful, and extremely repetitive...the article essentially says the same thing over and over, it's just worded a bit different each time. And why was it never merged as indicated it should be? 70.190.200.191 (talk) 10:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terribly Written Article and Should Be Merged
Talk:Ninh Thuận province

message: This is a map of Lam Dong province!
:Seems to be fixed. Badagnani 02:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong map 

message: As far as I know, the nuclear power projects have been stopped.
On the other side, Ninh Thuan has been selected by the government for preferential conditions for the development of photovoltaic power plants due to its abundant solar irradiation, which - together wit neighbouring province Binh Thuan - is the highest in the country.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefanhanoi (talk • contribs) 19:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrical Power 
Talk:Roxana High School

message: I know that it's far from being finished, but it's a start; anyone from RHS is more than welcome to contribute. MToolen 04:08, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Per WP:NOT#NEWS, I have deleted numerous athletic items of short term interest.  Wikipedia is not a school website, and should only contain information of long term importance.
I have also restored fact tags, and added more.  These tags should only be removed if reliable sources can be found in support of them, per wikipedia's policy on verifiability of information.  These tags are provided as a courtesy, as any unsubstantiated claims can be deleted, however they are there to provide time to editors to find the necessary sources.
Further, per Wikiproject Schools guidelines on what not to include in school articles, I have removed several non-notable staff members.  LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent deletions
Talk:Visser Three

message: :Image:Visser Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
In the Tv-Serie the human name of Visser 3 is Victor Trent. He hate it, when Jake eat slugs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.164.98.41 (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Visser Cover.jpg
Talk:WDOK

message: The link about Sue Wilson-Cordle being one of the few female PDs points to a web site that requires an account to access - making it not a verifiable source.StreamingRadioGuide 13:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Only 2,000 of the 13,000 analog AM/FM radio stations in the U.S. have converted to HD; of those that have converted, all still broadcast via analog as mandated by the FCC. Moreoever, the first HD channel of every HD Radio station is a simulcast of the analog signal -- again, as mandated by the FCC.
*239 million analog radio listeners in the U.S. vs. only 3 million HD Radio units. By far, analog is still the preferred choice among radio consumers.
*Clearly, the infobox should reflect that analog technology is still the dominant form of transmission. It's also no secret that the radio industry has been heavily promoting HD Radio; by including only the HD Radio formats, one begins to question the credibility of this article's content. Wikipedia is an encyclopedic endeavor, not a brochure for iBiquity. Levdr1 (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analog format
Talk:The Stupids

message: Could someone please add more on the reason why it was challenged? ~~ Sargent Teff
I know. Why is it challenged, anyway?~~Releeshan
I quote: "Challengers believed the books "described families in a derogatory manner and may encourage children to disobey their parents," as well as promoting low self-esteem and negative behavior."
:I must say I'm quite confused about this "Challenged" thing, what exactly does it mean?--Hibernian 18:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Essentially that certain of librarians' perceptual faculties are not altogether equal to those of the mean of the general population. Allard was not so avaricious or ill-spirited to have explored this fact in a follow-up book, which would have made him into multi-millionaire. JohndanR (talk) 20:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia protocols should require that every Wikipedia article have its funniest sentences removed. JohndanR (talk) 20:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WENZ

message: *Only 2,000 of the 13,000 analog AM/FM radio stations in the U.S. have converted to HD; of those that have converted, all still broadcast via analog as mandated by the FCC.  Moreoever, the first HD channel of every HD Radio station is a simulcast of the analog signal -- again, as mandated by the FCC.
*239 million analog radio listeners in the U.S. vs. only 3 million HD Radio units.  By far, analog is still the preferred choice among radio consumers.
*Clearly, the infobox should reflect that analog technology is still the dominant form of transmission.  It's also no secret that the radio industry has been heavily promoting HD Radio; by including only the HD Radio formats, one begins to question the credibility of this article's content.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedic endeavor, not a brochure for iBiquity.  Levdr1 (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analog format
Talk:WFHM-FM

message: There's no original research in any of the info I added.
Reference #6 spells everything out.
Vjmlhds (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, yes, there is WP:OR in the content you recently added – specifically, WP:SYNTHESIS.  The Salem source describes in limited detail the origin and/or meaning of the "Fish" brand used by many of its stations throughout the U.S.  Does this description then also apply to Salem-owned & "Fish"-branded WFHM-FM?  Probably.  But the Salem source never directly mentions the subject of this article by name, so -- absent another source -- you are merely inferring the meaning behind this specific station's brand.  You are taking a source which verifies one thing and applying it to something else: Salem uses the Fish brand for X reason, Salem-owned WFHM-FM uses the Fish brand, therefore WFHM-FM uses the Fish brand for X reason.  More importantly, there's the issue of whether or not this information on the logo/brand, assuming appropriate sourcing is found, even belongs in this article.  One could make a stronger case for including this in a "Fish" brand article or even the Salem company article.  (I also can't help but wonder if you're at least somewhat motivated by a desire to remove the  template, rather than finding truly relevant content to fill that section.  I wonder this due to your edits immediately preceding this issue.)  Regardless, please refrain from unilaterally making changes to the relevant content until we reach some consensus in this thread per WP:BRD.  Levdr1lp / talk 17:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't have anything in the article that specifically spoke about the meaning of the "Fish" name.  Now before, I did have a brief mention of it (with a religious website as verification), but if you look at my most recent edit, that information was removed, as I made sure not to include it.  All I had in the article was that Salem brands most of their CCM stations as "The Fish" - a fact verified by the Salem reference.  Another small point, the use of the CCM acronym is also verified by Salem as shorthand for Contemporary Christian Music, so again that isn't something I just pulled out of the sky.  Reiterating - there is no mention of any "meaning" of the "Fish" branding, only pointing out that "The Fish" is a common name used by most Salem CCM stations, a fact verified by my source. Vjmlhds (talk) 00:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No OR here
Talk:Marmolada

message: I think Marmoleda is the Ladin name for this mountain, not the Latin name. Gala.martin 21:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are totally right, it has been changed. Tubantia 13:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  marmoleda 
Talk:Wrangler (brand)

message: It's just one big freakin' advertisement. 75.159.234.116 (talk) 20:37, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Win/Win

message: Delete This page looks like a sandbox experiment. Someone (I don't know who) posted the full text of a weblog entry on a personal philosophy dubbed "the rule of win/win." I found it because my name was mentioned in it. I added it to my watchlist to see if they were going to turn it into a credible Wikipedia entry, but the originating user never returned. I believe it ought to be deleted. The rule defined by this page has not been adopted elsewhere. Rcade 04:41, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WGAR-FM

message: *Only 2,000 of the 13,000 analog AM/FM radio stations in the U.S. have converted to HD; of those that have converted, all still broadcast via analog as mandated by the FCC.  Moreoever, the first HD channel of every HD Radio station is a simulcast of the analog signal -- again, as mandated by the FCC.
*239 million analog radio listeners in the U.S. vs. only 3 million HD Radio units.  By far, analog is still the preferred choice among radio consumers.
*Clearly, the infobox should reflect that analog technology is still the dominant form of transmission.  It's also no secret that the radio industry has been heavily promoting HD Radio; by including only the HD Radio formats, one begins to question the credibility of this article's content.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedic endeavor, not a brochure for iBiquity.  Levdr1 (talk) 20:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Analog format

message: The article is woefully un-referenced. Also, much of the "History" section reads like a cheesy marketing pitch. I've trimmed away some of the more blatant marketing copy. Can others help in making these sections more encyclopedic? Dmitry Brant (talk) 21:26, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Dmitry.  I agree that most of the body, particularly the WNCR content, needs work -- poor sourcing, WP:POV issues, etc.  I'll do what I can.  Levdr1lp / talk 21:34, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: A construction permit in the FCC database for W291BV has it being reassigned to WAKS as the parent station. I'm not changing anything, however, as the translator is still relaying WGAR's HD2 signal. Nor can I definitively confirm that such a change has taken effect, just that it is "on the record." Nathan Obral (talk) 15:49, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: W291BV

message: Regarding this edit- the station website has not actually changed; it may now redirect to a different URL, but the actual official website -- as long identified on-air, online, etc. -- remains "WGAR.com". WGAR-FM continues to direct listeners to "WGAR.com" daily for contact information, contests, community events, employment opportunities, etc., and so I'm not at all convinced the station website should be changed in either the infobox or external links section at this time. Levdr1lp / talk 01:15, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station website 
Talk:George Parros

message: Added a new small section regarding Parros' disciplinary decision with regard to Tom Wilson's actions on the May 3, 2021 game versus the NY Rangers.  Hopefully, this neutral section will alleviate the malicious graffiti by angry fans, disparaging Parros personally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by USNPilot (talk • contribs) 02:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Wilson Controversy
Talk:Revolutionary Workers Headquarters

message: I note that an editor has categorized the RWH with "Communist Parties in the Americas."  My understanding, based on personal experience with the RWH, was that it considered itself a "pre-party organization" and not a party per se.  Anyone care to shed light on this?  --Midnite Critic 04:44, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, I think.  Creating a category for "pre-party formations" seems too reductive, however. It should probably only be categorized as a Maoist organizations.  Even that might be too broad though. It is an historical organization restricted to the US during its existence. DJ Silverfish 00:37, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally the intrepretation of a "party", when doing categorizations is quite liberal. It is a communist party or a party-building organization. The Communist parties category include several communist leagues, organizations, committees and other pre-party formations. --Soman 09:37, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communist Party? 

message: My recent edits are based on memory.  While never a member, I was marginally associated with the RWH.  So how does one cite that?  --Midnite Critic 20:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My recent edits:  "oral history" 

message: First, the following:
http://www.revolutionintheair.com/chron/chron4.html
The first entry for 1978 reads as follows:
January: Split in the RCP: after over a year of internal controversy, over the assessment of what happened in China (the leadership centered by chair Bob Avakian supported the Gang of Four) as well as strategy in the U.S., about 40% of the RCP membership, mainly in the East and Midwest, led by Mickey Jarvis and Leibel Bergman, split off to form the Revolutionary Workers Headquarters. RCP consolidates around pro-Gang of Four line, issues many documents, and organizes major Mao ZeDong Memorial Meetings on second anniversary of his death in September. (Red Papers 8; Revolution September 1978; Mao Meeting Press Release & Program in D-10; Guardian March 22, 1978 in BTr-4 )
Note that the RWH membership is characterized at this point as being "mainly in the East and Midwest".  I will therefore change "Northeast" in the article to "East".
Second, the article itself links to an RWH statement regarding the absorption/merger of BACU into the RWH, which speaks of the RWH thereby expanding to the West Coast.  If someone who knows how to do this wants to set up these cites, I would appreciate it.  Thanks.  --Midnite Critic 22:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two online sources 

message: This entire article seems to stem from independent research, which is against Wikipedia guidelines.  Nothing is cited.  --Xcuref1endx (talk) 11:12, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not one thing is cited
Talk:Weasel Walter

message: I just looked up this artist.  The notation that the subject may not be notable enough is absurd and needs to be removed.  Just as a simple indicator, a search on the unique name in quotes pulls 73,000 hits (not that this would even be necessary to prove anything relevant).  
I'm seeing this notation more and more on subjects I look up.  Why such zeal to remove subjects?  People need to step back and take the time to become informed about a subject before racing to remove it just because they know nothing about it.   Xerlome (talk) 18:38, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Hi, whoever 60.251.50.16 is, if you happen to see this! Your various edits are being reverted because...
* Some of the content you're adding is plagiarized. (...I originally said that it was from a source that is unreliable, but I shouldn't jump to that conclusion without looking more carefully!)
* Your edits aren't following Wikipedia's Manual of Style for the lead section opening an article. The lead should be an introduction & summary; it doesn't make sense to have a paragraph on the genre of "brutal prog" at the top of an article about a person.
* I'm not sure what "policy" this falls under, but the "instrument" section of the infobox isn't for every instrument a person has ever played.
* You're... sometimes wrong? Walter does not play contrabass; Brandon Seabrook does play on Shattered Dimension.
I appreciate your enthusiasm, because it's reminded me to clean things up here––but if someone undoes your edits, please don't put them back again; I just took down the issues template from this page! Knifegames (talk) 07:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 60.251.50.16 edit reverts

message: Earlier I had added a more fully-formatted version of the Luttenbachers discography w/ personnel, instrumentation, etc., but I'm realizing WW is probably going to need a separate discography page... so for now I'm working on those more detailed listings in a sandbox. Apologies, too, for organization or lack thereof; I've just added 70-80 releases & it's still nowhere near comprehensive, not sure how collaborations / co-led bands should be split up, etc. Knifegames (talk) 07:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography