Talk:The Destroyer (novel series)

message: Err, what issue is it where it mentions that JFK set up Cure org? Sources?--Jondel 00:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: JF Kennedy

message: Sinanju fans unite!--Jondel 05:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Solidarity

message: :Image:Inside-Sin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Inside-Sin.jpg

message: :Image:Destroyer1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Destroyer1.jpg

message: This article has been recently moved from "The Destroyer" to "The Destroyer (fiction)." May I suggest that "The Destroyer (book series)" would be more appropriate as it would be consistent with The Executioner (book series)? --Ted Watson (talk) 20:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New title 

message: I would like to ask that someone who knows how change back to the way it was before.  Fat Man's rationale is that "too many other things called "The Destroyer" for this to be considered the primary topic."  However, a look at the Destroyer Disambiguation page shows most entries are listed as Destroyer, not THE Destroyer.
See Ted Watson's example above.  Another example: the rock band The Who. If you type The Who, you get taken directly to the band's entry, though they are also in the disambiguation page for Who.  I propose that "The Destroyer" is the same type of case. And making it easier for fans to find is appreciated-- Donna
(talk)9:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A fair point--more of the links The Destroyer pointed here than to other destinations.  However, some of them were intended for the wrestler and others to various comic books.  I suppose I didn't consider the move might be controversial when I made it.  I already did a good deal of work disambiguating the old The Destroyer links, making them point to more specific locations, but if someone wants to move this page back to its original destination, I won't fret.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 03:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Title 

message: Starting copy edit; updates will be posted here. Comments here please. David_FLXD (Talk) 04:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit notice 

message: This article says the book series was first published in 1970s, and was the first of the "men's adventure" titles. "men's adventure", however, is described in its article as a magazine genre that *died out* in the 60s.
One of these articles is wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.89.139 (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incoherent link to "men's adventure" 

message: Info was added in 2009 and 2014 concerning a new production. Not even the IMDB had any confirmation of the event 3/8 years later. Source #1 was unreliable. Source #2, the Hollywood Reporter is in the neighborhood of reliable, but 3 years after the fact, unrealized hype doesn't belong in Wikipedia: it falls into 2 or 3 categories of WP:NOT. Tapered (talk) 20:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumors/hype of new production