lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Student Bodies

message: I haven't seen the movie, but what the hell is "hand language"?  Maybe this means sign language? --Maikel 15:31, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hand language

message: thumb|Is this "Lamab"?
For those of you who saw the film, does "Lamab" look like this? - If so then this school is a filming location for the movie. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lamab High School"
Talk:River Tummel

message: I believe that a lot has happened with River Tummel since 1911... Isn't there a new (?) Loch Faskally created by the dam? And a fish ladder to let the salmons continue to use this river. These things should probably be mentioned. (but, since I only visited Pitlochry once, 10 years ago, I'll leave the actual writing to somebody who really knows what is happenening there).
Nyh 15:34, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  happened
Talk:The Journal (Newcastle upon Tyne newspaper)

message: The Journal is also a local newspaper in parts of the South West,  and I suspect, it's a popular name for local papers, too. Rob Church Talk | Desk 15:36, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put a sort of DAB notice at the top. When anyone wants to create other articles, this can become a DAB page. The JPStalk to me 23:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that I've added a new article on another newspaper, I've restructured this so The Journal is the main DAB page. The Journal (newspaper) still redirects to this article. I hope that seems right to everyone!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.237.149 (talk) 11:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:ECMAScript for XML

message: Something should be said in the article about why e4x has been deprecated.
Teo8976 (talk) 19:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why deprecated 
Talk:System of systems

message: :The first message here is incorrect:
This System of Systems page was created on September 7th, 2005 and has been edited on several occasions by Mr. Oleg Sindiy, a graduate student in the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.  Any and all feedback would be greatly appreciated; please feel free to also look at our System of Systems research website at System-of-Systems Research Webite. - 01:55, 20 June 2008 98.220.22.106 (Talk) (4,388 bytes) 
:The history of this article, see  gives the right data. This article is created 16:18, 19 July 2004 by the anon user 62.244.184.66 (Talk). Several people have made valuable contributions to this article. If you want to introduce yourselve, start an userpage. This kind of desinformation is not acceptable here. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 02:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The start of this article 

message: I would propose the following definition for System of Systems:
It is a assemblage of task oriented or dedicated systems that pool their resources and capabilities to obtain a new system, more complex, offering more functionalities and performances than the sum of it parts.
- Combining multiple systems into a group does not necessarily improve performance, which is a misconception of SoS.  The individuals also don't need to be task oriented.  While I can see the advantage of designing them this way, it shouldn't be required as part of its general definition. -Jheld  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.123.51.32 (talk) 05:08, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: The current introduction says:
System-of-Systems is a relatively new term that is being applied primarily to government projects for addressing large scale inter-disciplinary problems...
The term system of systems is also a term mentioned in one of the first systems theory articles General Systems Theory
The Skeleton of Science from Kenneth E. Boulding see . Boulding has gives this term an fundamental meaning, with should also be meantioned in this article. - Mdd 22:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction isn't quite right
Talk:List of Washington Capitals players

message: Isn't just a plain boring list better suited in Wikisource than here? The curate's egg 16:01, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource

message: When entering names onto the list, can we please keep it alphabetical? It makes it so much easier for everyone. Masterhatch 18:14, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: alphabetical, please
Talk:Marian Smoluchowski

message: Smoluchowski circulated his solution for Brownian Motion to laboratories in Berlin in 1904 to get experimental verification before publishing.  Einstein then plagiarized Smoluchowski's solution line for line to publish it in 1905. Smoluchowski then finally published in 1906.  Max Planck and also Von Laue both recognized Smoluchowski, not Einstein, for Brownian motion.
The above, unsigned comment by Licorne, is patently false according to one of Licorne's own favorite sources (Langevin). As indicated in the following link, Langevin compared his own approach to Brownian motion, Einstein's, and Smoluchowski's. As indicated, the methodology of all three were different. Einstein's and Langevin's agreed on the resulting observational law. Smoluchowski's disagreed by an anomalous factor. Langevin locate's smoluchowski's mistake, showing his different method should have led to the same formula as Einstein and Langevin. Such outright false statements are, unfortunately, characteristic of Licorne. I say the statement is an outright falsehood because it implies he has looked at the papers and found them line for line the same. Since this is obviously false, Licorne has either lied (or ignorantly copied a lie - the more likey scenario) about seeing the actual papers, or, having seen them, lied about the result of comparing them. All equally inexcusable:
http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/theo1/hanggi/History/Langevin1908.pdf
--Pallen 21:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Einstein Plagiarized Smoluchowski Line for Line

message: You reverted my edit of 9 Mar, and removed the  tag. However, I still can't access the URL. Can you? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Strange, it was fine when I added it... -KH-1 (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, the server is down unusually often or/and unusually long? What would you think about adding the docsbay link from 240e:d6:800c:6130:c81a:3951:8f8b:efad's edit on 9 Mar, but omitting the  tag for now, hoping the page will be accessible again? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked and it seems to be working again.-KH-1 (talk) 12:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I could download the paper, too. So your version is ok; but it might be a good idea to warn about the uncommon low availablilty of that site (no idea whether there is a template for that). How would you think about adding the docsbay link again, as a backup? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuliński link
Talk:Japanese submarine I-168

message: The submarine that sunk Yorktown was I-168 (not I-158). See combinedfleet.com
: http://ww2db.com/ship_spec.php?ship_id=116 says it was I-168 that sunk Yorktown. Anyway, this article needs a fix. The title says I-158 but the first para says 168. ww2db also references combinedfleet.com  --Preveen 10:26, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Apparently there is as yet no article
note: (later Rear Admiral-Ret) ?
G. Robert Shiplett 01:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walter Gale Ebert
Talk:Day of Vengeance

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  13:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Rann–Thanagar War

message: Was Guy there? I don't remember him, but he shows up in Supergirl's memory of the final conflict in the most recent issue of Legion of Superheroes. --Chris Griswold 18:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guy Gardner 

message: For someone reading Infinite Crisis in trade paperbacks it would probably be a good idea to say after what issue of IC the special of this should be read. Anyone know? Tony2Times 18:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of specials

message: :Image:3-war.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:3-war.jpg
Talk:Secret War (comics)

message: Anyone know who wrote the intro for the hardcover? 12.215.224.101 08:26, 2 April 2006 UTC 12.215.224.101
If you are referring to the "By Anonymous" intro, I have no idea. Unless the guy is willing to officially write about the classified operations, chances of finding that out are nill.64.85.234.166 (talk) 07:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hard Cover question

message: I removed the tag, because it's completely unnecessary. The article contains essentially nothing except a synopsis of the events in the story -- everything else mentioned in it (publication dates and whatnot) can also be easily checked from the issues themselves. As it stands, the article doesn't need any references other than the issues themselves. Anyone can go back, find these issues and check whether the article is correct or not, which is the point of listing references. 
Of course, if the article is expanded to include things such as background on the series' production or something else that isn't covered by the issues themselves, that certainly requires references... but right now there isn't anything of the sort. -- Captain Disdain 22:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The <nowiki>{{Unreferenced}}</nowiki> tag

message: "Spider-Man's past has been changed to an unknown extent, so both of these events have probably been altered.[6] Though it was more likely because Logan was drunk at the time." As much as I appreciated the cleverness of this crack at Wolverine, I fail to see any proof of this assumption or anything that warrants this theory being written here. Unsigned comment by  Arkkeeper, (sorry forgot to log in)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need source for Info (aka Reference, Source, etc.)
Talk:The OMAC Project

message: :Image:1-omac.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:1-omac.jpg
Talk:1time

message: From WP:RfD:
* 1Time - redirects to South Africa. 1Time is an airline based in South Africa, but is not actually the country itself. Furthermore, 1Time is not mentioned at all in the article. -- Aviationwiz 22:42, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://www.1time.aero/ApplicationLoader.swf
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Moved from the article page
A Zimbabwean low-cost airline titled “Fresh Air” took flight for the first time on 2 November 2012. The airline is run by 1time airlines in association with Zimbabwe’s Nu Aero and the venture was meant to see low-cost flights offered between Johannesburg and Victoria Falls in Zimbabwe. 1time was supposed to provide the planes for these flights however 1time applied for provisional liquidation on 2 November.  
  
There will be a later date where the court will decide whether to put the company into final liquidation or discharge the order. During this time any interested parties, i.e. a buyer, are offered the opportunity to show cause as to why the airline should not be placed in final liquidation. 
At this stage everything is very up in the air, leaving customers frustrated and confused. A press release from 1time airlines is expected in the coming days. 
See http://www.south-african-hotels.com/blog/2012/11/1time-airline-liquidates.html
 
:This was originally written by User:Ryanmackie - I removed it as unsuitable for the article. Roger (talk) 09:45, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Roger/Dodger! I agree to this! Aliwal2012 (talk) 15:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Liquidation information update
Talk:Zipper (ride)

message: It appears that I have recently edited and taken care of all concern on the discussion page from before. Can someone fix the references so #1 in the article doesn't come up as #4 at the bottom in the reference section? - I got confused on how to edit the reference designation correctly.Crazy951842367 (talk) 08:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, should all be fixed now.  :-)  Use the cite web template to cite online sources - you only need the URLs once.  Make sure they are between ref tags as well, to distinguish them as sources instead of just external links.  The References section only needs to have  in it, which will list all the inline sources in two columns.  See Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information.  :-)  I have also used the convert template for some of the numbers, and made other improvements.  leevclarke (talk) 21:41, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit

message: The main article says ride operators are "encouraged" to employ a "No Single Riders" policy.  But as it appears, the insurance companies are ordering "No Single Riders" enforced like it's Federal law enforced by the FBI and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.  They began cracking down hard around 2006 or 2007, all the way to the point where no Zipper ride in the United States of America has allowed single riders on since 2008. Bentup1 (talk) 21:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No American Zipper has allowed single riders since 2008.
Talk:Shut Your Mouth (album)

message: Regarding the articles Shut Your Mouth (Epitaph) and Shut Your Mouth (Shock/Shagpile) - one just redirected to the other - so I moved the one that existed to this article Shut Your Mouth (Frenzal Rhomb album) and fixed all the redirects.  Although the two have slightly different track lists, I think they can co-exist - a separate article isn't needed for each version -- Chuq 22:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Meet the Family (album)

message: I removed the line "Beaded Curtains (Part One)" appears on the single of "Mum Changed the Locks". as it doesn't appear on the listing, as can be seen on MusicBrainz.
If Beaded Curtains (Part One) is another name for one the single's songs, it needs to be specified here.
Thisisabore (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Antony Balch

message: I am very concerned that this article looks like a cut-and-paste from another source. 23skidoo 16:55, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I changed the film list article to a redirect here. And looking at the list which needs drastic formatting and removal of POV and potential copyvio statements, I don't think the list is needed. I will paste the list below if someone wants to go through it. I suggest only listing films actually produced and directed by Balch. 23skidoo 17:23, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Film list
Talk:Legendre symbol

message: The Legendre (a/p) symbol is usually not defined for p=2. Moreover, the extended definition given here is not consistent with the Kronecker symbol. E.g., the Kronecker symbol (a/2) is either 1,0,-1 depending on a. But the Kronecker symbols is an extension of the Legendre and Jacobi symbol. Anyone agrees to remove the case p=2 from the definition? 24.228.93.22 17:12, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The case p=2 is now removed from the definition. None of the references I checked defines the Legendre symbol for p=2. Besides the inconsistency with the Kronecker symbol, also Euler's equation would not be true for p=2. 24.228.93.22 02:06, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

text: It does not behave in the expected way. Basically, the whole point of the Legendre symbol is to have a convenient notation for quadratic reciprocity and similar properties of quadratic residues. That is, we are dealing with polynomial (quadratic) equations modulo a prime, and in such situations various oddities arise when the modulus divides the discriminant of the equation; in this particular case, the discriminant of x2 − a is 4a, hence we need p odd (and not dividing a).—Emil J. 13:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

text: See the discussion of this at Math.StackExchange.  Essentially defining the symbol with p=2 as base does not help Legendre formulate his law of quadratic reciprocity. Hardmath (talk) 11:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legendre symbol usually not defined for p=2 

message: I've been editing this and related pages quadratic residue, jacobi symbol adding notes, etc. 
Virginia-American (talk) 07:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if we should add something about how the Legendre symbol is expressed in various markup systems (HTML, Unicode, LaTeX), esp. since the name Legendre symbol suggests that the topic is notational.  I've seen these markup issues being added to various math-related articles. Hardmath (talk) 11:43, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision

message: I think there is a mistake here. The formula supposedly from Gauss, expressed in terms of the variable zeta, doesn't produce a result of 0 when it should.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.67.107.10 (talk) 01:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake?

message: How can Kronecker symbol be a generalization of Legnedre symbol?  Shinjikun (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I get it. Shinjikun (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kronecker symbol be a generalization of Legnedre symbol? 

message: Another generalization is when a is in F_{p^k}. Jackzhp (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Should mention when a is in Fq2

message: Same comment applies to Jacobi symbol  James in dc (talk) 02:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are there two tables?
Talk:WWF Forceable Entry

message: Can we get a page for Finger Eleven's "Slow Chemical"?
It's far and away the best song on the album, and one of Finger Eleven's best singles that they've ever released.
Just asking.  
Thanks guys.
:First of all, sign your posts. Second of all, Wikipedia is not a forum. SAVIOR_SELF.777 22:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Wedding breakfast

message: "The name apparently arises from the fact that the bride and bridegroom would have been fasting before the wedding, and so the reception would be the time when they would break their fast."
In what times was this "fact" around?  And how long would they fast for?
I know of "breakfast" in the normal sense having this etymology.  But I'd imagined that "wedding breakfast" was an analogy with the normal meaning: as breakfast is the first meal of the day, so wedding breakfast is the first meal of married life. -- Smjg 17:31, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope I have now clarified these issues, or at least documented the claim.  seglea (talk) 00:41, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Riki Rachtman

message: Uhh, what gender is this person?  
"He is the sister of...."?
:Presumably this has been sorted now? There is no reference on the page to him being the sister of anyone, nor has there for a while Jonomacdrones 22:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i think what they were trying to say was that Karyn Rachtman, who has worked on many movie soundtracks and other scores, is his sister.  geez, i hope so...i would never imagine Riki being a girl!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.80.36.13 (talk) 01:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender

message: I know I saw him on an episode of " Ice cold killers" on Investigation Discovery,but don't see it in "Notes", "References",or "In Other Media" Rooster127 (talk) 22:41, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riki Rachtman