lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:USS Burrfish

message: For the bulk of the time the sub was under Canadian command it flew the Maple Leaf ensign (65-68).  At the end it flew the 1968-and-on CF engsign and that is what is the best ensign to display here.  "Canadian Forces Naval Jack is the official flag flown on ships of the Canadian Forces Maritime Command.  Introduced in 1968, it replaced the Canadian Blue Ensign as the official naval flag and Canadian Maple Leaf (1965-1968)."  It is inappropriate to apply the United Kingdom naval ensign to this article. Hu (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Naval Ensign
Talk:USS Blackfin

message: I have the very impressive original brass plaque for this great ship. So many missions and war duties. I was truly impressed when reading about the history behind this plaque and the ship it's commemorating! I'll leave the link if any one is interested. 2600:6C55:6900:4D2:38DC:97:67F9:77E6 (talk) 19:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uss blackfin plaque
Talk:USS Caiman

message: Hello,
I am the webmaster of the web site www.flamincaiman.org.  This is the official USS Caiman Association website.
Please post a link to our web site on your page for the USS Caiman (SS-323).  
The link is   www.flamincaiman.org
Thank you,
Greg Baer
Webmaster
www.flamincaiman.org
Noopara 14:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. TomTheHand 14:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Site
Talk:10th millennium BC in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is very badly written, using the first hand hand plural and completely unsourced. Concur the five phase approach does presume that everywhere in North America went through the same stages at the same time, which clearly is a simplification. Given these article are only stubs, in my honest opinion, developing the geographically-specific phase articles would be preferable. However, this was only a proposed deletion, accordingly, thanks for giving an explanation. Addhoc 18:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:USS Charr

message: A broken coupling allowed sea water to flood the engine room of the Charr while submerged to 100 feet off the coast of California. Heroic crewmen sealed themselves in the engine room and maintained power to rapidly bring the Charr to the surface.
That incident made the news and headlines of the day and the two crewmen received Navy Commendations. 
See this web page: Story of the Charr incident.
SHOULD THIS BE ADDED TO THE MAIN PAGE? AdderUser (talk) 09:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catastrophe of 1961
Talk:11th century in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:Sven Cal Payang

message: When was his name EVER "Sven Cal Payang" - plau (talk) 14:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In the Phantom Pain Report, which from my knowledge have been the only source of his name in english letters. --Refuteku (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sven Cal Payang???
Talk:USS Bumper

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
 USS bumper. The GPS mark puts her as located in the gulf of Thailand but according to records she was decommisioned in 1950 in turkey and was never sunk.
  David
dircavediver@gmail.com
—61.19.67.75 (talk) 03:07, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Coordinates removed; they may have corresponded to ship's location at some time during WWII, but do not seem to correspond to her current location (if she still exists). Deor (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:12th century in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:USS Lizardfish

message: There's an evident conflict in sources. Lenton (p.95) credits Lizardfish to EB. Who's right?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  20:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Subsunk?
Talk:13th century in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:Australian Soil Classification

message: I think I have read that the ASC is becoming the universally used soil classification system. if this is so the heavy mentioning of Australia (the "part of the Australia project" tag for example) should be revised. --Hypo Mix 07:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So long as it has "Australian" in its name, I think it should be tagged into the Australia project. But if you can find references suggesting that it has been or is being universally adopted, then please put them in and tone down the Oz talk. Hesperian 11:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Not actually the case, its a region-suitable system that has limitations in other environments. Most countries lacking their own system use the US one. You may be thinking of the World Reference Base? --Leobrien (talk) 06:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just Australia?
Talk:Timeline of North American prehistory

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion

message: * Oppose merge. Both articles are long and serve different purposes. Yuchitown (talk) 03:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:2nd millennium BC in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion

message: Originated in America?  I highly doubt this, and it certainly needs a source.Jarhed (talk) 10:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pottery? 

message: needed to be added to this timeline are the proofs by Prof Barry Fell of Egyptian copper mining (15,000 pits) in Michigan peninsula approx 2,000-1,500 BC (decried by archelologists with no knowledge of the anciuent languages Prof Fell had experts translate) and adding Sumerian writing found in Peru dating to 2,000 BC also, along with the Davenport, Iowa stelae setting forth Egyptian priest of Osiris ritual. These undeniable facts create a whole new proven panoply of Euro, Mideastern presence across the Americans of which the mystics of academe are fatally ignorant. And add also the ceramic glazed cooking balls (Egyptian) found along the Southeastern US coasts (my estimate 1,500 BC).  Show shenk XXX Sr 69.121.221.97 (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: add america bc
Talk:3rd millennium BC in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:USS Cubera

message: Anyone who served on the USS Cubera in the late 60's, who may know Al Frazier, please contact swedehearts@live.com Thank you--Sherry Swedren  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frazier2747 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albert D. Frazier
Talk:4th millennium BC in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion

message: The intro talks about the boundries of the US, but the article discusses events within the boundries of Canada.  Needs to be fixed.  Also Polynesia isn't in North America, so I don't know why it's mention unless it's because Hawaii is a state. Kevlar67 03:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro
Talk:List of mutual-fund families in Canada

message: As far as I can gather, Allianz of Germany does not own AGF Funds. AGF is a Canadian-owned independent mutual fund management company. I believe this reference in the table is in error.
: You're right.  There was some confusion relating to Allianz's ownership of Assurances Generales de France, which is also known as AGF. The table has been corrected.
Barclays Global Investors has at least $13B under management in Canada, including over $8B in Canada's largest fund, iShares XIU.  Why don't they appear on the list? 70.73.4.197 18:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The ticker you noted is an exchange-traded fund (ETF), not a mutual fund.  Barclays may also have mutual funds in Canada -- I'm not sure.  If they do, they would be included in the $10.3 billion of non-reporting members.  If you provide a link for their Canadian registered mutual fund balances as of Dec 31, and they are notable, then we can list them separately like we did for CI mutual funds (see footnote 2 in the article). Deet 00:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Interesting point, although I think it is debatable.  In Canada, for example, I don't believe that either that the IFIC or the MFDA consider ETFs in the definition of "mutual funds". Deet 21:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:5th millennium BC in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:6th millennium BC in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:USS Jallao

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for USS Jallao (SS-368)
because the article states "Monturiol was decommissioned 12 December 1984, and scuttled off Cartagena in 1985." 
—George580622 (talk) 09:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the coordinates from the article. They clearly had nothing to do with the location of the submarine's scuttling, and we don't include coordinates for movable things like ships unless the site of their final resting place is known. Deor (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:7th millennium BC in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:8th millennium BC in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:USS Lamprey

message: There's an evident conflict in sources. Lenton (p.95) credits Lamprey to EB. Who's right?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  20:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Subsunk?

message: There's an error : SS-372 Lamprey will become SS.11 Santa Fe not SS.12 Santiago del Estero ! (source : Jane's & Hazegray.org & uboat.net).
SS-375 Macabi will become SS-12 Santiago del Estero.
Conforoa (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:35, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you know this?  My father served on the Lamprey! 67.83.210.216 (talk) 12:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Sub (Argentina)
Talk:USS Menhaden (SS-377)

message: There's an evident conflict in sources. Lenton (p.95) credits her to EB. Who's right?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  20:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Subsunk?
Talk:Ignatius Ghattas

message: Please expand this stub.  Thanks. Majoreditor 05:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Started Article 

message: The information in catholic-hierarchy.org  does not indicate that Bp. Ghattas had the personal title of Archbishop as Abp. Tawil did (and as Abp. Bustros does); they had received the title in previous positions.    However, references on this page say he had the title; is that in error, or is there a reference from an ecclesiastical source to show that he had the title?  Thanks. Chonak (talk) 06:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There was some confusion over the matter, but The Melkite Handbook published by the Eparchate of Newton lists him as bishop, not archbishop. Majoreditor (talk) 02:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Chonak (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify title: Bishop/Archbishop
Talk:9th millennium BC in North American history

message: A number of articles relating to early periods in North American History have been proposed for deletion because "Archaeology of the Americas gives accepted phases for North American history; this segment appears to be arbitrary."  
I disagree with this, this article (and its siblings) are obviously intended to form a timeline that could be overlaid over other regions of the world without reference to geographically-specific "phases."  Furthermore, the cited article describes the five phases as "simplistic" and notes that they have been replaced with "more local classifications." Crypticfirefly 05:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to proposed deletion
Talk:Crunch

message: Should this also link to Attachment parenting? I've seen several references on the web, but nothing conclusive other than the "Crunch Lite" link at the attachment parenting page, and references to being a "crunchy mom"... 
I ended up at this page while trying to find the Attachment parenting page, and it took me a few more minutes to find that one. Peaceduck 05:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:USS Ronquil

message: The color photos in the main article do represent the
Navy submarine Ronquill, with it's smooth lines, full large sail, and Nautilus-type shape (And it truly does not have the appearance of those angular, narrow con tower subs that we see at waterside museums & in WWII movies).PFSLAKES1 (talk) 05:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article's Main Photo is not of the ''Ronquill''
Talk:USS Tiru

message: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=669262243089909&set=a.593440194005448.152610.173386339344171&type=1
Benyoch ...Don't panic! Don't panic!... (talk)  21:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  link ... TIRU in dry dock Brisbane 1966   

message: The link to the word "tiru" brings you to a page on "Tamil honorifics". Google finds me this page: http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/t6/tiru.htm, which states that the tiru is "A member of the lizardfish family. Voracious and carnivorous, this fish is found in the Mediterranean and the Atlantic—especially in the Bermuda area and Caribbean." Nothing about the Tamil language there. Thus I intend to change the link to the page on Synodontidae and maybe give a brief explanation..45Colt 06:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiru.
Talk:USS Barbel (SS-580)

message: The article includes this story:
"Another report of this event is that Barbel lost control due to heavy seas and insufficient positive buoyancy resulting in unexpectedly submerging with the control room hatch open. What actually happened was, in calm weather, is that the CO and other leadership failed to complete a diesel exhaust gas blow (called a low pressure blow by today's submarines) which pushed diesel exhaust into the main ballast tanks to remove residual water. The failure to conduct the exhaust gas blow in conjunction with a relatively high speed on the surface caused Barbel to gradually push itself lower and eventually the bow angle caught the water and the boat drove itself to 110 feet which caused the three Sailors on the bridge to let go; the OOD and lookout were lost at sea and one other recovered. The lost OOD was Lt Walter Gray Womble III and the lost lookout was Fireman James Lear. This is from someone who was on the Barbel when the event occurred.[2]"
Unfortunately this is unsourced. While it may possibly be accurate, it doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards unless there is a verifiable source.2600:1000:B039:C5EF:F81E:10C5:C040:2382 (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flooding Incident 

message: Barbel appeared in the first episode of season 4 of The Brady Bunch in September 1972 during the tour of Pearl Harbor. The number 580 is clearly visible on the sail.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.215.12.129 (talk) 04:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brady Bunch