Talk:Exogeny

message: Can anyboyd tell me why this is a encyclopedia page and not just a dictionary entry in the wikipedia? Pdbailey 03:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The arguments for keeping this article in Wikipedia would be as in WP:AfD/Endogenous.  Essentially, if-and-when this article is properly fleshed-out, it will be more than a dictionary entry. —SlamDiego←T 16:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary entry? 

message: Perhaps the form of this article should be reconciled with that of Endogeny. Or better yet, the pages should be merged into one article until the article is large enough to be split into two.134.10.125.163 (talk) 04:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency 

message: Dr. Schudy has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Schudy has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Simeon Schudy & Verena Utikal, 2012. "The Influence of (Im)perfect Data Privacy on the Acquisition of Personal Health Data," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2012-12, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Schudy's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Gottschalk has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Gottschalk has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Peter Gottschalk & Sheldon Danziger, 2003. "Can Work Alter Welfare Recipients' Beliefs about How They Will Fare in the Labor Market?," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 567, Boston College Department of Economics.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 20:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Gottschalk's comment on this article 

message: Shouldn't this article be moved to Endogeny and exogeny and tweaked here and there so it explains both terms in the numerous contexts it covers? Given how the two terms are always complementary I think it's better to treat them in one place, like has been done for Horizontal and vertical or for Relative and absolute tense. Any thoughts? – Uanfala 10:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed retitling/recasting of article 

message: I propose to merge Exogeny into Endogeny (biology) since they cover sufficiently similar topics that they can be explained within the same context. Jamgoodman (talk) 19:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It makes sense for Endogeny (biology) to be renamed to Endogeny and exogeny (biology) and expanded accordingly, but I don't see why Exogeny should be merged there: the biological aspect is only one of several that are covered here. – Uanfala (talk) 20:15, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: Exogeny into Endogeny (biology) 

message: Cultures can emerge endogenously or exogenously. This has relevance in the discussion of indigenousness. Arminden (talk) 12:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnogenesis missing