lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Environmental consulting

message: This page's current incarnation looks like someone venting, rather than an encyclopedia article. Is there any significant amount of encyclopedic content that could logically go here, rather than under Environmental law or Consulting or Compliance (regulation)? --Quuxplusone 22:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: "If an environmental problem is discovered property owners that deem themselves a responsible party will most likely reserve monies in escrow in order to resolve the environmental impact." Huh?  This is unsourced and, in my experience as a consultant, untrue.  Can someone verify this info?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CPitt76 (talk • contribs) 06:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced Info

message: A green consultant is different from an environmental consultant. A E.C. works with mitigation for cleanup. A G.C. helps a businness green up it's operation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Centennialgreen (talk • contribs) 04:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Trade Federation Cruiser

message: Does the Trade Federation Cruiser, The Invisible Hand control the Separatist Droid Armies and destroy planets? --206.255.32.51 04:25, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Blend of Droid Control Ship and Death Star? 

message: I build models as a hobby and I'd like to build a model of this. There are no kits anywhere so I thought I'd build it from scratch. I can't find any die-cast toys or anything to work off of, and there are very limited pictures of it on the web. Does anybody know where I can find a picture of the top, bottom, sides, front and back of this ship? I am having no luck as it is!
Thanks.
Agent js03 14:30, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Visual Information 

message: To me, the size, shape and graphic appearance of this ship rank it as a (variation on) the Dreadnaught featured amongst others in the Star Wars computer game "X-Wing Alliance".
:Plausible enough but AFAIK there are no canon sources about it; and anyway, the major source of information on pre-Empire dreadnaughts is the Katana Fleet which was being developed during the Clone Wars, so it is kind of unlikely except for a common precursor. --maru  (talk) contribs 21:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Error In Classification?
Talk:Paul Foster Case

message: Original note:  So far this is just the beginnings of a brief sketch based on information available from lvx.org and bota.org.  It needs to be finished and fleshed out.
1/4/2005:  So more of the fleshing out has been done.  It remains to add in the references to bits of Case's history.  Lee Moffit's bio-page on Case does have some cryptic footnotes that could be used.  But they wouldn't meet wiki standards.
Some of the links off of Case's page also need to be filled in.
The portions of Case's work that have fallen into the public domain could be added to the wikibook collection and links could be added (Kybalion, TIRO, his magazine articles Secret Doctrines of the Tarot, etc.)
Adding some photographs would be nice too.  Does anyone know who hold the copyright on the original photos kept at bota.org?  I know they're used elsewhere, but Wiki's standard prohibits copyrighted material without license.
----
I have some photos of Paul Case and will scan and upload one or two to the page. I also have access to biographical information that is distinct from Lee Moffitt's outline and will endeavor to flesh out some details as time permits. Perseverantia 19:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Symphony No. 39 (Mozart)

message: I amended the description of the trio: the arpeggios are played only by the 2nd clarinet as an accompaniment to the first which plays the melody--Zeisseng 20:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is rather more clear that Schubert had Mozart's 40th in his mind (look at Schubert's minuet, and Mozart's minuet and finale). After all, he is known to have admired that particular Mozart symphony. Double sharp (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Sonar

message: Hey Team, wanted to crosslink the caption for the captured sonar image of sunken ship: [T-297] to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_M68
Thank you. gilyazov (talk) 08:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 09:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2021 

message: I want to talk about the audio file of the sonar is wrong that is not how sonar sounds. I just want you to know that there was a mistake. ThomasRTolleson0507 (talk) 22:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the audio file correct? 

message: Hello all! 
I propose adding some different types of sonar devices including echosounder sonars, imaging sonars, and acoustic positioning/velocity sonars. This is the article I'm looking to cite: https://bluerobotics.com/learn/a-smooth-operators-guide-to-underwater-sonars-and-acoustic-devices/
Thanks! Yoleeth (talk) 03:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  add categories of sonar devices
Wikipedia talk:Remove personal attacks/Temp

message: I am ambivalent about this section.  I copied it from the old version and did some reorganization and rewrite but I'm not sure how much value it really adds to the page.  The only purpose I could see anymore was to summarize the disputes which were raised over prior versions.  Rossami (talk) 23:03, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd leave it in, it makes it clear that the policy isn't necessarily all roses. Some users will have concerns and if we present replies to common ones on the page it should hopefully reduce acrimonious discussion about it elsewhere. Thryduulf 15:29, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: re: Answers to concerns

message: Considering that some people really don't like RPA, it may be an option to list "strikeout personal attacks" as an alternative. Radiant_* 08:37, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
: Personally, I consider the strikeout solution to be ineffective.  The purpose of the rule is to remove the inflammatory comment and restore the discussion to a fact-based and rational discussion focused on building a better encyclopedia.  Even when struck out, the comment remains visible and can inflame the debate.  With that caveat, I will attempt to add the suggestion as an allowable option.  See if it flows...  Rossami (talk) 13:19, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel entirely the opposite.  Unless the personal attack is blatant and extraordinarily foul, a strikeout is more than enough to show that particular comments are unwelcome, and then the refactoring becomes a clear demonstration of "good" comment versus "bad" comment.  I don't think you'll get nearly as many revert wars over whether something was in fact a personal attack, because the struck out comments remain there for everyone following to judge whether they were actually personal attacks or not.  --Unfocused 14:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strikeout?
Talk:Value (computer science)

message: In this phrase (near the top of the article): 
   such as the location in which the bits produced by the expression are stored in,
the word "in" appears twice.  I was about to just get rid of one of them ("be bold"),
but I don't really care much, which one we keep.  Any comments, before I just pick one?
Mike Schwartz (talk) 00:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor nit-pick:  ("in" occurs twice, here) 

message: As defined in the lead, a value is (an interpretation of) something inside the computer at run time, not something that could occur in a program text. Therefore the statement that it is the normal form of an expression makes no sense. Indeed some values cannot be denoted by an atomic expression (in most programming languages "-1" remains an operator applied to a positive number), or possibly not even by any expression at all (a language might for instance not have any expressions for array values) and conversely different atomic expressions might have the same value (using decimal, octal and hexadecimal notation for instance). So the statement about normal forms should be removed. Marc van Leeuwen (talk) 08:03, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  value is a run-time notion, not the normal form of an expression 

message: Instead of "Another example is the C expression (4 + 9)", it may be better to write "the expression (a + b)", since "(4 + 9)" boils down to just another immediate, which was already explained in the previous paragraph.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.192.94.225 (talk) 13:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assignment: l-values and r-values 

message: The notion of "value" is tricky, so I'm not surprised that this article has several problems:
* "a value is an expression which cannot be evaluated any further (a normal form)" — in what sense is "evaluated" meant here? Clearly in Lisp, say, the s-expression (list 1 2) is a value, just as the result of evaluating that s-expression, namely (1 2). As for normal forms, plenty of rewriting systems support loops.
* "L-values have storage addresses that are programmatically accessible to the running program..." — this is certainly wrong in general, though true in C. In Algol 60, call-by-name arguments can function as l-values, without Algol 60 supporting an "address-of" operator. I have separated out the generic discussion on R-values from the C-specific part. --Macrakis (talk) 14:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Basic issues

message: E.g. X-value (and lots more) is a missing page. I believe C still has only l- and r-value, and many other languages. Is this too much trivia here (what to say, only that there are more and add this link)? Are these new ones only in (recent) C++? comp.arch (talk) 11:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  C++ has more value types now.. 

message: Not entity, but expression. Checkout the in C++ draft. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 12:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entity
Template talk:About

message: The 3rd example:
* → 
should have a generic, unqualified "other uses" / disambiguation example explicitly included just before (or after) it:
* → 
So "About (disambiguation)" would be the clean example here, but as this is the "About" page, this  About template already links to "About (disambiguation)" by default. However this syntactic, calling-convention privilege is shared by none of the other pages listed in About (disambiguation), even though it would be useful to link to the disambiguation page from any and every of the potentially ambiguated pages, see About (surname), About.com, about.me, abOUT, About URI scheme, About box, or About equal sign. I mean to use this in related and adapted works of literature and art, since this example strikes me as a little silly.
I had trouble understanding that I needed to abstract this example to get what I wanted — the template parameter interpretation is fairly opaque. I think this usage, which should be common, should be show in way that's easy to understand, and easy to copy and use without deeper thought beyond the intent. 
I expect that a disambiguation link to something with a name that is a substring of the including page title is a common occurrence, and so appropriate syntax should be demonstrated on this documentation page.
I have in mind to use this in such a case (my recent edits are hint enough), and there are around 2 dozen pages I think I will use this example on immediately. Mcint (talk) 01:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 March 2023 

message: Replace item 4, with shorter form.
* → 
should become
* →  Mcint (talk) 06:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done  took care of this. Lizthegrey (talk) 16:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 March 2023 (2)
Talk:String (music)

message: Could someone add this to the article. They're mainly for bass guitar but La Bella offers two types for "jazz guitar". And maybe someone should add "half-rounds" to the halfwound description. I've seen a lot of people refer to them as such & that is what D'Addario calls their line of halves.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:300:4300:D540:2C27:C4B3:9D90:9DD (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of tapewounds
Category talk:English folklore

message: Is there a way I can refer to Category:Scottish folklore as a link in the introductory sentence, without making this a sub-category of Scottish folklore as a side effect? — B.Bryant 23:55, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  comments from 2005

message: I think that Cornish Folklore articles shouldn't really be in the English Folklore category for two reasons:
*Cornwall though 'usually' considered part of England has it's own distinct culture and thus folklore. Cornish folklore is more akin to Welsh and Irish...etc.. folk traditions than to English folk traditions. 
Most folklorists consider Cornish traditions separate from English traditions, this is not a British folklore category but an English one.
*Again though considered to be from a part of England, the Cornish people are of their own ethnic group and thus their folklore should be treated as an appendage of their ethnicity.
 
Any opinions? Sigurd Dragon Slayer
==Robin Hood category paradox?==
Robin Hood→Robin Hood figures→Fictional gentleman theives→Robin Hood?
The cycle goes on like that. Should someone fix that?
Sikovin (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Cornish Folklore'''

message: Robin Hood→Robin Hood figures→Fictional gentleman theives→Robin Hood?
The cycle goes on like that. Should someone fix that?
Sikovin (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Robin Hood category paradox?
Talk:2004 Redfern riots

message: "lasting until Monday morning" If we don't know when they started, this is meaningless because it doesn't tell us how long the riots lasted. What day was Feb 14th 2004? pomegranate 00:09, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
Is there any particular reason where 2 incidents of civil unrest are linked in a page that appears to be inappropriately titled. Hmette 12:02, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Landing Ship, Tank

message: Just read the Kindle edition of this book. The novel clearly states that the two ships caught in the storm are LCTs and not LSTs. Also, the description of the ships with uncovered tank decks fits LCTs. I propose this book description be moved from this article to the LCT article.
Thoughts? Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 09:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, moved. Thanks! Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 03:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hammond Innes's ''Atlantic Fury '' 

message: This description of LST use in the lede paragraph is highly misleading. As stated in the Landing Craft Air Cushion article, "Due to its tremendous over-the-beach capability, the LCAC can access more than 80% of the world's coastlines...Previously, landing craft had a top speed of approximately eight knots (15 km/h; 9.2 mph) and could cross only 17% of the world's beach area". 
While this quote states 'craft', the number for LSTs was similar.
Thoughts?Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 20:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This enabled amphibious assaults on almost any beach." 

message: The Newport class has it's  own page, as do each of the ships. I don't know how to add a box on the right side of the page. Jtmilesmmr (talk) 20:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Newport Class is  not mentioned
Talk:Köchel catalogue

message: All the K numbers between 376 and 381 inclusive are missing and this seems to go back right to the beginning of this article 15 years ago. Why is this? Can anyone fill in or explain the missing information? Thanks. Hyperman 42 (talk) 17:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see K. 376, 377, 378, 379 and 380 in the list (Violin sonatas Nos. 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). K. 381 is listed as Sonata in D for Piano Four-Hands. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Make sure to sort by K1, not K6. All catalog numbers are unique, so if something got renumbered it's simply missing in the K6 list (as it has a different number there). ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info. I simply went to the main wikipage originally and that already seemed to be sorted by the second column, K6, which was what confused me. It seems to be the default, but should the default be to sort by K1? Though I suppose the most up-to-date list is logical. Hadn't realised I could sort the columns myself - thanks for the info. I can now see that the complete block missing out of the K6 list anyway has had various renumberings, mainly as K374a-f. Hyperman 42 (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also still intrigued by the so-called Clarinet Quartet K380, which appears on at least one CD coupled with the Clarinet Quintet, and also once on YouTube. But the K number clashes with the Violin Sonata No. 28. If anyone can throw any light on this I'd be grateful. Hyperman 42 (talk) 17:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit of googling indicates that a Clarinet Quartet in E-flat major is an arrangement by Johann Anton André of Mozart's Violin Sonata, K. 380. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing K. 376–381
Talk:Jefferson Elementary School (Spokane, Washington)

message: Um, hello? Where? City? County? Country? ??? Niteowlneils 00:18, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Your questions have been answered. --Bahn Mi 07:27, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: This is just one of numerous school articles and school redirects on the Wikipedia that should turned into be a disambiguation page. For example, I came to this article following a link from the Santa Ana Unified School District article. I am surprised that after my edit to the SAUSD article there are now no articles linking to Jefferson Elementary School (not even a school district article!), because there must be hundreds of Jefferson and Thomas Jefferson Elementary Schools around the United States. BlankVerse 11:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  THIS SHOULD BE A DISAMBIGUATION PAGE!
Talk:Neutrino Factory

message: Hi everyone.  There was nothing on Neutrino Factory in the WIKI that I could find, so I put this up quickly as a start.  Where I've written [L] or ->this<- it means I want a link, I'll add them if I get time.
*Its been cleaned up. Wanted to make note that the content was generated by Stephen Brooks, who's working with the UK project.
Cwolfsheep 00:48, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Can we characterise the beams from the different factories ? - Rod57 (talk) 18:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What luminosities and energies ?
Talk:The Waterboy

message: Is Sandler's character really "mentally retarded"? He just seems very sheltered and has a stutter to me. -- BrandonR 00:32, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
*The character is actually autistic. --Lordshmeckie 23:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mental disorder]]

message: Shouldn't there be a page defining what a "waterboy" is? TripOnMyShip (talk) 13:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: "The movie was extremely profitable, earning over $160 million in the United States alone and made Sandler a successful actor with Waterboy becoming his second $100 million film in a year, along with The Wedding Singer."
But Adam Sandler's Filmography shows that The Wedding Singer only made 80 million. TripOnMyShip (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict

message: I removed the "original research" tag from the sentence saying the character's voice bears a strong resemblance to the Excited Southerner character. It would be original research to say that Sandler based the character on Excited Southerner and Canteen Boy with no source to quote. It doesn't quite rise to the level of original research to say that there is a resemblance between the two voices.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leenunes (talk • contribs) 23:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of character

message: It could be included that Harold Lloyd's estate sued this movie for stealing the plot of "The Freshman." Lloyd himelf was sued by someone else for stealing to create his movie.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barnsward (talk • contribs) 16:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit 

message: The way-too-many times I've watched this film, I woulda sworn that Mama Boucher says "foosball" or "fusball".... PurpleChez, 2/16/16  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.249.207.195 (talk) 14:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fool's Ball 
Talk:Client-Centered Therapy

message: Highly suspect copyvio.
lots of issues  | leave me a message 00:39, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Needs to be reordered and changed so it says more about what it is and less about all the versions it isn't.  Also, need to put the what before the who thought of it.RJFJR 15:45, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
:Yes, and someone needs to add techniques.whicky1978 talk 16:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite reason
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Jguk/Evidence

message: I am unsure if this qualifies as evidence, but I do believe it is important, in the style of amicus curiae
I believe the NPOV policy votes1 shows the massive lack of consensus, with excellent arguments on a near 50/50 split
This lack of consensus shows that no party was in fact, objectivly, acting on the advice of the consensus.
My point in saying this is that I urge the Arbitration Commitee to stick with a conservative interpretation of their mandate, and ignore the question of content from his case, but to focus on the behavior of the wikipedians involved.
--Tznkai 00:45, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not from the ArbCom, but I can answer: they are still on the evidence stage. Go on and add your evidence. --cesarb 00:23, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Fingerboards

message: Could someone who can read German that has knowledge in this topic area find out more information about the tournament stuff?  I know next to nothing about fingerboarding and just happened on this article at random.  Do they even still have tournaments?  Is this a current sport?  Information on this in English is particularly difficult to find. BenSamples 00:48, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

message: The majority of this article has now been merged into Fingerskate, and the article has now been made into a redirect to that article. CLW 22:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Talk:Marseilles, Illinois

message: Someone may want to include the way the town's name is spoken.  Mar-Sails. Stargoat (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The History section says "pronounced the same as the French city". Is that incorrect? John Link (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Mar-Sails

message: Perhaps a section dealing with the record flooding of April 2013 is in order.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.30.71.158 (talk) 04:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Flood

message: The City of Marseilles was founded by Ephriam Sprague in 1832 when he moved to the area to establish a sawmill. It was he that named the city Marseilles because it was, to him, an ideal place for an industrial center, much like the industrial city of Marseilles, France.  The next year, Lovell Kimball moved into Marseilles, and built a new dam just down river from Sprague, flooding out Spragues dam and mill, and ruining his business. 
* I found the above researching the Nabisco Bldg that is depicted in the town Post Office mural. I'll dig a little more digging....searching for "Sprague". . Buster Seven Talk 17:53, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Founder

message: Why did Kimball add an "s" to the end of "Marseille"? John Link (talk) 20:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the final "s"?