lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends

message: No offense meant in removing the addition of the Peabody and Sherman links from "Characters" and "Films". It's just that this template was intended to focus only on the actual Rocky and Bullwinkle stories. A link to "Peabody's Improbable History" already exists under "supporting features". If one is to add Peabody, Sherman, and the WABAC machine as characters then we should also add at least half a dozen other characters from Dudley Do-Right, Aesop & Son, and perhaps Commander McBragg. If we're going to do that we should probably have a separate "Jay Ward Productions" template—not a bad idea, given the impact, distinctive character, and ongoing popularity of some of those cartoons. But adding other features' characters while only listing R&B story arcs doesn't really make sense, and to add specific episode links for all of those other features would become cluttered and ungainly.  PurpleChez 05:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

message: What source stated that there's going to be a new Rocky and Bullwinkle series? 172.250.44.165 (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Untitled Rocky and Bullwinkle Series"
Talk:Malaysiakini

message: "Malaysian government's tolerance regarding internet censorship" ? That sounds like it comes right out of the NST. Can't we find a better word than tolerance? Ryan Albrey (talk) 02:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which opposition? BN or DAP-PAS-PKR? __earth (Talk) 08:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Who's saying Malaysiakini is neutral? I'm just pointing out that the term "opposition" is not descriptive enough. Besides, it requires "implicit" assumption which may not be obvious to a third person with limited knowledge in Malaysian politics. A more helpful way to describe a political position is to name that position, like pro-BN, or left, or liberal, or conservative, etc. __earth (Talk) 11:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

text: You're not getting it. The term opposition is interchangeable. The opposition can by anybody depending on the result of the elections. Therefore, it is better to use better words like what I've said earlier, left, right, monarchist, social democrat, progressive, environmentalism, etc. __earth (Talk) 03:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The malaysiakini.com web site itself gives different figures for number of visitors from 50,000 to 160,000. I have taken the lower estimate for the map.Anwar (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I got a more reliable figure of 170,000 visitors annually for 2008. Malaysiakini was saying the truth after all.Anwar (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Visitors

message: Malaysiakini updates the site every day. New content is limited on Sundays, but there is still stuff put up. 58.71.169.160 (talk) 15:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Except for Sundays" is wrong
Talk:Harian Metro

message: That is what the lede says, but if you read further into the article it looks like someone updated the text but not the lede. Fixing this probably best done by updating to 2021 Elinruby (talk) 09:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest circulation? 

message: If redesigns are important enough for a timeline entry, they should be succinctly described as well, or what is the point? Also, someone should check this against the History section of the corporate website. Elinruby (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic design history.
Talk:Malaysia Today

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:New Sarawak Tribune

message: Removed the section below, as the language suggested that it was contributed by an editor with a conflict of interest (specifically, the phrase "an error of judgment on our part", and it injected POV (the final paragraph). Notified the contributor. The substance of the edit - that the paper has been reborn with a new name - is a useful addition but needs verification.
 'The New Sarawak Tribune
On 19 May 2010, the New Sarawak Tribune returned to the newsstand after a four-year hiatus. Tribune Press Sdn Bhd chairman 
Datuk Hamed Sepawi said during its shutdown, the management "took time to reflect and reinvigorate ourselves".
The prefix “The New” signifies a fresh beginning and replaces Eastern Times (as it did the old Tribune), which had its purpose in life, born as it were from a blot in the paper’s history. There’s no running away from the fact that the old Tribune was suspended in 2006 as a result of an error of judgment on our part.
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zahzuhzaz (talk • contribs) 18:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The New Sarawak Tribune'' section removed: possible COI
Talk:Operation Lalang

message: According to the White Paper explaining the arrests, various groups who had played up "sensitive issues" and thus created "racial tension" in the country had exploited the government's liberal and tolerant attitude.
Does anyone have a copy of this white paper? Is it reproduced online?--Han (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Paper? 

message: This entire section is unsourced and makes the article look POV. There are some facts presented - amending the Printing Presses and Publications Act and Police Act, flushing out The Star - but no sources linking those facts as outcomes of Operation Lalang. Other parts of the section constitute POV or speculation that has tangential relevance to the article (eg bias of the mass media into the 1990s).
I have tagged the section with citation-needed templates and propose to get rid of any unsourced material that remains after a week or so.
--Mkativerata (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Implications for civil liberties
Talk:Tony Marshall (actor)

message: After seeing Tony Marshall's Only Fools and Horses appearances from 1989/90, specifically the 1990 Christmas Special when his character's at a club, I've been quite unsure of his age. He would've filmed that episode at 16, therefore making him too young to drink at a club. Plus, he looks older than the age he was at at the time that he was in OFAH. Boushenheiser (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:Abbeville High School (South Carolina)

message: Start. I feel that this article warrants a Start rating. I have done significant work on it and it has 8 references, all but one of those third-party.Calebrw (talk) 02:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start or Stub 
Talk:Richard Budgett

message: Copied from article of 23 Sept 2008 by Budhen (talk) 16:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from the article 
Talk:Luna Halo

message: Taylor Swift has recorded a song that Nathan Barlowe wrote - "Untouchable" it is included on her album - Fearless - the Platinum edition that was released on October 26, 2009.
71.173.112.68 (talk) 00:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Taylor Swift

message: The infobox band is depreciated, and needs to be updated with infobox musical artist
--Axcess 06:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: infobox

message: I deleted this reference (http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/cdreviews/LunaHaloEP.asp) for the sentence "Nate Barlowe is quoted as saying they only kept the name to sustain bookings at churches while the band made itself known in rock clubs." Because there is nothing about this on the webpage. Though I tend to believe that this is true, without anything to back it up, this sentence might just need to go.Genesiswinter (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Improper reference
Talk:Siege of Oxford

message: I am replying here to a couple of comments posted on the talk page because I an not sure the IP talk page to reply to. The level of inline citation is now far far better than it was 2 months ago, the notes are helpful and using so many more sources will allow readers to see that this is a balanced and well researched article. The rewrite is in precise clear English. Thank you for your hard word. Most of the article is factual and I suspect easily verified. I have a concern over three sentences that while I know them to be true, I think need a source to verify them because they are analysis of facts which is something Wikipedia editors can not do.
--PBS (talk) 12:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2013 

message: The article has the line "On 1 June Fairfax was prepared to take the city by storm if necessary, and one of the outworks, called "Charles Fort", was surrendered to Colonel Weldon." It's sourced to Whitelocke's Memorials of the English Affairs but a mistake has occurred. The book lists events which happened on 1 June, including the sending of terms to the governor of Oxford that day. "The General sent honourable Conditions to the Governor of Oxford, who desired a day or two to consider of them, the General had all things ready for a Storm." This may refer to Fairfax's opening proposal of 11 May, in which case the date is wrong. Differences between the Old Style and New Style dates (Whitelocke was using the old style) may account for some of this, as may some confusion with the sending of various revisions of the treaty backwards and forwards. But the following entry for 1 June ("Charles Fort was surrendered to Colonel Weldon for the Parliament, upon Articles") has been conflated with the entry above for Oxford, making the latter seem to be about Oxford events. In reality Charles Fort was in the West Country, where the regiment raised and commanded by Colonel Ralph Weldon was then active. Weldon's entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography records "His [Weldon's] regiment saw further action in 1646 at the siege of Exeter and captured Charles Fort and Inchmere House for parliament." I'll remove this for now. 77.96.115.80 (talk) 14:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Fort and Colonel Weldon
Talk:Wisbech and March line

message: New to this and not sure this is in the right place or of the right style ... how can it be so complicated?  Anyway ... I reckon the "last passenger train" which is stated as running down the line in 1984 may have in fact been a train organised by NENTA or similar.  I was involved in WAMRAC (as a green teenager!) around that time and remember WAMRAC trains to Cambridge and Lowestoft (why Lowestoft I have no recollection) but no others organised by WAMRAC. Each of these were DMU's and not loco hauled. Markeg 23:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that several railways have similar setbacks - but, while railways might not want to flag them up on an advertising site, these setbacks are relevant to an encyclopedia.  Once the line has managed to open and prove itself a success these comments will be proven invalid, but even then I'd argue that they are still notable.  DiverScout (talk) 05:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Not sure whether it was factual or not, as referencing on this article is still a bit poor.  Something needs to be sorted as the Bramley Line reply to the ATOC report needs to be referenced.  It states that the report is published.  Is it available online anywhere? DiverScout (talk) 12:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

message: Hi!  I'm not connected with the Bramley Line in any way, but am interested in the development of this article.  As there seems to be a risk of an "edit war" starting between the pro and anti lobby could I ask people to ensure that their edits are referenced so that it is clear that they are not expressing personal opinions!  Thanks. DiverScout (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing and edit war
Talk:Jatindramohan Tagore

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 10:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Graham Cairns-Smith

message: Is there a name for it, and should we not have an article on the subject? Richard001 07:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Don't handpick reviewers (like Daniel Dennett) and include their evaluations of an author's book, in an encyclopedia article about the author. You don't need to qualify that, although the author wrote the book, some people disagreed with it. Stating that they wrote it does not imply that it's assertions are unquestioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.215.181.127 (talk) 00:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  review tagging of books 

message: It says: "He was disenchanted with the other ideas about chemical evolution including the Miller-Urey experiment and the RNA World." That's a big claim that needs to be verified. 70.90.198.172 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Big Claim

message: "Smith suggests that the ancestors of humans might have had alien biochemistries"
I suggest that either a) this one line section is completely removed, or b) it is expanded sufficiently to explain what this really means.
As it currently reads I think it makes Cairns-Smith sound like a von Däniken-style crack-pot (i.e. that he has written than humans are descended from aliens).  This is nowhere close to the truth.  First, 'ancestors of humans' here is correct but misleading; it should say 'ancestors of humans -and- all other life on Earth'.  That is, give or take any, purely hypothetical, still extant, 'alien' biologies still alive on Earth (very likely, there are none).  Second, 'alien biologies' here does not mean alien in the sense of extra-terrestrial.  It means biologies/biochemistries different than the ubiquitous DNA-based, 20 amino acid kind that is the basis of all studied life on Earth.  I think what Cairns-Smith suggested is that the first life on Earth may have had a different form of biochemistry than that of its eventual descendents, life as we know it now. 86.148.209.191 (talk) 14:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading implications re alien ancestors
Talk:Alexandria (disambiguation)

message: The cities in Canada and Australia are probably named after persons other than Alexander the Great. AnonMoos 07:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2007

message: Is there any reason why these are not listed?146.50.96.170 (talk) 10:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not Alexandrias in terms of the modern names commonly-used in English. AnonMoos (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iskenderun and Kandahar? 
Talk:Brandon Hardesty

message: The subject might be notable under WP:BIO, but his article needs more sources.  A cursory Google search brings up these:  http://news.mywebpal.com/news_tool_v2.cfm?pnpid=808&show=archivedetails&ArchiveID=1181860&om=1 http://news.mywebpal.com/news_tool_v2.cfm?show=localnews&pnpID=574&NewsID=827988&CategoryID=8011&on=1
Google News produces results, too.  
Please incorporate a few before someone hastily nominates the article for deletion.  Ichormosquito 08:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I softened the notability template to a verification one.  I'm pretty sure he's notable.  Ichormosquito 02:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability template

message: The section for his career seems to go far too in-depth, talking about individual videos he's made, their number of views, and descriptions of the videos. This appears to be a relic of an older era of wikipedia. I think this should be cut down considerably.
Also, the archive of his personal website appears to be broken. I've tried to load it, and I get an error message that reads "Failed loading language files". Much of this article is unsourced or cites that website, so those parts should be removed. 98.118.9.141 (talk) 01:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career section too detailed/Archive of website broken
Talk:Hōtō

message: Isnt' any one interested in why it is exclusively available in the Yamanashi-Kofu area? Because you can find Kishimen from Nagoya in Asian supermarkets in America, but not hōtō. The answer lies in the food itself. I wish the Wiki commons had a taste uploader. :) -- Emana 01:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclusivity 
Talk:EU-organic production-regulation

message: The new relevant regulation is EC/834/2007, "repealing regulation (EEC) 2092/91": http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:189:0001:0023:EN:PDF --Biologos (talk) 10:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Janni Howker

message: Subject is sufficiently notable but the article falls a long way short of meeting Wikipedia's standards.  It needs expansion, clarification and updating in all sections and it needs reliable third-part references adding to support the content.  I've added one reference and a References list but that's not really enough.  Help required to fix.--Plad2 (talk) 11:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article has a number of issues 
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit (4th nomination)

message: PersianPoetGal removed the MfD notice mentioning speedy snowball close, but how can an MfD be speedily closed as a snowball no consensus? Anchoress 08:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The arguments were overwhelmingly keep, but the administrator probably closed it to argue that users shouldn't use MFD just to prove a point. - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 11:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I put my reasoning on the Admin's Noticeboard. But in short; based on past experiences with deleting wikiprojects and given the confusion of the whole sitution, there is no consensus on whatever the result. So close it as no consensus and allow the CVU to figure out a consensus without the cloud of deletion hanging above their heads. That will usually produce saner results. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 18:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well said. - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 03:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Snowball?
Talk:Salicylate sensitivity

message: For those with Fybromyalgia, an all over muscle and tendon pain, some doctors insist that salicylate free products be used as much as possible in combination with a twice daily regimen of guifenesin capsules.
It seems that the fibromyalgia was caused by the kidneys failure to open up enough to let the phosphates through.  If the body cannot release excess phospates, it is theorized that the phospates build up in the body until they create small crystals in the body which are very painful.
So in order to get rid of the fybro pain and other fibro symptoms, the sufferer must restrict use of salicylate free products and take guifenesin twice a day.
:Two points:
:(1) If all of your fibromyalgia symptoms go away when you dump salicylates out of your diet and drugs, then you don't have fibromyalgia.  Instead, you have a misdiagnosed salicylate sensitivity.  
:(2) If you want to add something like this to a Wikipedia article, let me suggest that you put it on the fibromyalgia page, under differential diagnoses -- and that you make sure you have multiple, independent, impeccable sources before you do that. WhatamIdoing 03:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Misdiagnosis

message: I have removed the unsourced ADHD assertion from the list of symptoms because this source indicates that it's wrong.  There may be secondary effects -- dumping junk food will stabilize blood sugar swings, for example, and dumping food dyes will reduce undiagnosed allergies -- but there is no direct relationship. WhatamIdoing 20:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ADHD not related

message: Articles sources cover aspirin while "Salicylate sensitivity" covers more, including salicylic acid. Feingold diet links don't link directly to the info they claim when using it as a source and it's not a very reliable source in from the view of Wikipedia anyway as it has a vested interest in promoting a diet. It also claims to be able to cure/improve a great big list of mental illnesses, which makes you wonder why not everyone in the hospitals aren't eating it if it's accepted by mainstream medicine. That could be for all I know simply because mainstream medicine hasn't looked at Salicylate sensitivity in enough detail yet, but it still does not appear to be a widely accepted, proven treatment for the massive list of  conditions it claims. This all taken together, means there isn't a single, reliable source that even proves Salicyate sensitivity (as opposed to a more specific aspirin sensitivity) exists. I'm not saying it doesn't, but none of the citations currently here support it doing so. 87.115.53.155 (talk) 10:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the history, this edit is somewhat questionable. The editor made this and only this edit. LeadSongDog come howl! 05:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to cite references 

message: There is a discussion on the recent edits to this article at WikiProject Medicine. If you are interested, please participate at . — Newslinger talk 15:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on recent edits at WikiProject Medicine
Talk:Film Censorship Board of Malaysia

message: Is this board related to FINAS? If so, maybe it should be merged. kawaputratorque 09:06, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I was in the cinema recently and watched Hancock say "Then you better sue McDonald's because they fucked you up." Throughout the movie, though, whenever someone called Hancock an asshole the word was cut. I got the idea that speed affects whether the swears will be cut when I heard someone say "Asshole" fairly quick. Anyway, this has nothing to do with the article, I just wanted a place to vent. 118.100.16.198 (talk) 06:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed of swearing affects whether or not the swears will be cut 