lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gibbsite

message: This article is almost identical to , which at least claims to be copyrighted.
That website has a notice about educational use of their material (), but I don't know if that would apply to Wikipedia or not.
I'm new to this stuff, so I'm just leaving this note so someone who knows more can do whatever's needed. --Allen 19:43, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some hydrogens are connected both to oxygen and to aluminium. Al-H bond should be deleted.--141.30.244.8 (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ball and stick drawing
Talk:National Eagle Scout Association

message: I hated to do this, but most of the content was a copy of the official NESA site , and was posted by an anonymous IP, thus no opportunity for dialog. --Gadget850 19:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: *Support  Both articles are short and the KoD article is very weak; it should be merged to an Origins section.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  18:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  22:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Knights of Dunamis]] merge
Talk:Edward Burne-Jones

message: These two external links were added by an anon:
* Collection of photographs of Burne-Jones stained glass designs at StainedGlassPhotography.com
* [www.cafepress.com/ralley Burne-Jones designs on apparel and various gift items]
They seem to be links to businesses selling reproductions of public domain art as gifts.  As such, I find them suspiciously like advertising.  If there's a consensus that they should be restored to the article, please do so.  Smerdis of Tlön 19:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've slapped a fact-tag on this line: "The paintings are believed by some to have influenced the young J.R.R. Tolkien, then growing up in Birmingham."   This seems like it ought to be true, but "believed by some" is pretty much weasel-wording, and I cannot find any supporting note in the indexes of Carpenter, Shippey, or Hammond & Scull, which is where I would expect to find such a comment. - PKM (talk) 01:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: (Copied from my talk page) I think the connection is a general one that includes William Morris. See here. Hope that helps. Carcharoth (talk) 07:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Influence on Tolkien

message: I am nominating this article for GA. - PKM (talk) 05:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Tweaked to wording I can back up with citations. - PKM (talk) 01:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA

message: Re the new info and associated fact-tag ("withering" contempt) I am sure I have multiple sources for that, will check. - PKM (talk) 19:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Tweaked to wording I can back up with citations. - PKM (talk) 01:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Baronetcy

message: Came here to read up on his oils technique -  it looks to me like liquid glazes over a strong underpainting (both for flesh and fabrics) but couldn't find anything in the article on it? Is it simply that we don't know how he painted?
Tony Irwin  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.251.137 (talk) 22:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technique? 

message: A copy of the book was featured in the Series 42 episode of BBC's Antiques Roadshow from the National Botanic Garden of Wales 2, on 3 May 2020 and was valued by book expert Matthew Haley at £5,000. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Antiques Roadshow]]''
Talk:Chuck Mosley

message: The article's title should be changed to MOSELY. --87.244.167.183 08:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Found this page randomly, did my best to fix the NPOV issue while retaining the content.  Accordingly,  tag removed. -DCrazy 10:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed NPOV
Talk:Mucopolysaccharidosis

message: What happened to MPS V?
:::See the page under Types, Overview table. MPS V redirects to MPS IS, with the name Scheie syndrome. -- Deborahjay (talk) 17:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think most of the content on this page should be split onto the pages for the specific disorders. Any objections? --Arcadian 15:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nope, go ahead. --WS 19:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled (MPS V)

message: How the the MPS could make bone dysplasias?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singleschot (talk • contribs) 07:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect MPS on bone
Talk:Alpay Özalan

message: Is it really necesary for there to be former in front of his playing position, as far as I can tell its not the typical format for other ex players and it seems patronising to the man.(Kyle)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.58.219 (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former? 

message: i eddited some points which showed the opinion of one person e.g "he is a very strong and very talented defender. Littlepaulscholes 14:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit
Talk:Treachery, Faith, and the Great River

message: It's episodes like these that make me groan about the idea of having to put "(DS9 episode)" to the title of every article about a Deep Space Nine episode. To link to this article, one has to type Treachery, Faith, and the Great River.
Though on the other hand, many DS9 episodes have titles that are just one common word (making the parenthetical mandatory) and by including the parenthetical for every single episode article it simplifies the episode navigation template. ShutterBugTrekker 20:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rugby league in the United States

message: I live in Washington DC and have never heard of the American National Rugby League.  I followed the link to the official website and it seems that I could just join the Washington team rigt now if I felt like it.  It's one thing to talk about Rugby League in the US, but this seems like a propagandist page by somebody associated with the league.  Also, we certainly don't need pages for each team.  There are about 8 local Rugby Unions with at least as much support, recognizability and significance, which is to say, very little.
:We're committed to docmenting the history and situations of all nations who play rugby league. Yes even those that have a small interest. POds 13:52, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitiled

message: What's the difference? The article should clarify.--BillFlis 21:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rugby vs. "rugby league"?

message: I'd hardly think that a one-off game with just over 10,000 constitutes that rugby league has gained popularity.  As far as I know, rugby league is not a popular sport in the states.  --Spewmaster (talk) 01:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 12,000 including several A-list celebs but then that was the stadium capacity. Rugby league is a minority sport in the USA but it is better known than it was. Russell Crowe wnt to town on promoting the game.GordyB (talk) 09:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity ?? 

message: We have a major problem with the way the domestic competitions are described here. Specifically, there are no reliable sources backing any of that up. I can't find any evidence that the WAMNRL has an announced kickoff date or list of teams, and I can't find any evidence that the "Midwest Rugby League" or the "Florida Rugby League" are even real. A lot of the teams listed in all five groups seem to be based on one-off comments by the two leagues whose existence is confirmed (the AMNRL and the USA Rugby League), but we can hardly write our articles based on that.--Cúchullain t/c 14:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: WAMNRL is highly unreliable to put it mildly. This is speculative nonsense. There is supposed to be a junior league in Florida though (courtesy of Jacksonville Axemen) and the bit about flag / tag rugby is true (albeit this has nothing to do with either rugby league governing body.GordyB (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Domestic competitions
Talk:Online transaction processing

message: Article claims the definition of a transaction by the TPC is a complete business exchange. However the cite link just goes to the frontpage of the TPC site. I cannot find TPC's definition of a transaction from there.
76.102.12.213 (talk) 05:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with citation

message: To maintain parallel construction with the OLAP article, I recommend that either one of the following should take place:
*The Online transaction processing article should be renamed "OLTP", and "Online transaction processing" should redirect to the "OLTP" article, -or-
*The OLAP article should be renamed "Online analytical processing", and "OLAP" should redirect to the "Online analytical processing" article.
Either method works for me, so long as these two articles are parallel in their construction.  There is currently one vote over on the OLAP article to keep that article named OLAP, with a redirect from "Online analytical processing."  What do you all think?  Thanks. SqlPac 16:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support.  This article and OLAP article should have parallel construction in naming and use the same naming convention. SqlPac 00:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
::It looks like OLAP was changed to match OLTP, so I think this is no longer an issue.  There was a dissenter on the OLAP page when I originally recommended that OLAP be changed to match OLTP, so this issue may come up again in the future.  For now it looks like it's been resolved satisfactorily, with both articles using the same naming convention.  Thanks. SqlPac 05:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 06:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Đông Hưng district

message: Could somebody who knows what this place is clean it up to make sense? --YixilTesiphon 20:28, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the place even exist? Sounds suspiciously like a comedy/porn star name to me. I don't even want to think about with I'd find if I typed Dong Hung into Google! --Ukdan999 02:20, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Point, but I doubt they'd add the funky D thing. Somebody trying to be funny wouldn't go to that much effort. --YixilTesiphon 03:25, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I checked, and it exists.--YixilTesiphon 03:26, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I redirected the article on Dong Hung here and removed the following POV statements..."It has been known as the heroic place. In the past, people here defended against enemies bravely. It also is a cultural place." It just really needs a good expansion now. *Exeunt* Ganymead Dialogue? 04:36, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cheilanthaceae

message: Hrm... so here's what I think the situation with Pellaeaceae and most of the other recently-named segregate families is:  some recent genetic analyses support them (e.g., by showing larger previous families to be para- or polyphyletic), but there's not enough congruence among studies, or enough independent loci being used, for me to feel like it makes any sense to name and worry about a family that may blow away in the next phylogenetic windstorm. Paalexan 20:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Anthony Muñoz

message: I added a bit about his early life and the part where Ontario honors him by naming a park after him. Is it still a stub?--Rockero 21:07, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Conglomerate (geology)

message: when they should be.
--58.107.30.145 08:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: formation conditions of conglomerate are not in the article

message: The image of the debris flow from California looks much more like a breccia or even a megabreccia due to the angularity of clasts, and probably should be moved to one or both of those pages. Jim Stuby (talk) 21:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The rock is a breccia (type) produced through the process of a debris flow. I'll move it since in this article a breccia is not considered a conglomerate.Wilson44691 (talk) 21:43, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Great picture though. Jim Stuby (talk) 01:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: File:DebrisFlowDepositRestingSpringsPass.JPG

message: There is no obvious rationale for the examples included, in fact do we need such a section? Mikenorton (talk) 14:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I belive that such section is necessary, however it shoul include world famous localities, for example som oldest Archan/Proterozoic conglomerates if exist; famous conglomerates of Witwatersrand Group (known for abnormal gold occurence), some examples of good petroleum reservoirs...--Pelex (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples section 

message: Not mentioned in article. Equinox ◑ 14:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Nagelfluh is a type of conglomerate found in the Nagelfluhkette. Either it should be added as an example or deleted. Mikenorton (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "nagelfluh" redirect here?
Category talk:Wikipedians in Ontario

message: Does anyone have a link for looking up info such as townships with a map or descriptions. Does anyone use this page on a regular basis or is there a better spot to ask "Ontario" questions? Thanks in advance! (Stormbay 22:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Township 

message: Just noticed that the link for the subcategroy of Wik...in Region of Durham comes up under "T". I'm not sure why, and don't know how to fix it. I don't suppose it matters to many since I'm the only one on it, but perhaps if it was in the correct place (D) more would find it.
Yukonruby 02:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of Knowledge to fix
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jacob Neusner bibliography 2

message: Why was the conclusion listed as "keep"?  Looking at the most recent discussion page on the proposal to delete the article, shouldn't it be concluded that the consensus was to trim down the bibliography to a more reasonable level, and merge that into the main Jacob Neusner article?  I am concerned that Neusner's massive bibliography page is (a) not an encyclopedia article, (b) a vanity page, (c) Totally out of line when compared to the bibliographies of all other people on this entire encyclopedia, and (d) not even in line with Neusner's own college!  They don't bother to place all this info on their website. Given the comments on the discussion page, I hope if no one takes offense at me attempting to edit this bibliography down to a more modest level. RK 21:25, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ensenada, Baja California

message: When was the city of Ensenada founded? Was it named for Zenón de Somodevilla y Bengoechea (1702-1780), Marquis of Ensenada and prime minister of Spain under King Ferdinand VI? A paragraph on the history of Ensenada would be helpful. — Diamantina 21:28, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Named for the Marqués de Ensenada?

message: * Oppose What articles link to statistically isn't a basis for naming. If 100 articles link to Ensenada that actually intend to link to this article, then 100 links need updating. This article title is in the proper form. --Davidstrauss 09:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not moved. Feel free to make Ensenada the dab page again. —Nightstallion (?) 09:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the move request (the proper forum really needs to be set up here) 

message: I'm wondering what the population change was between 2005 and 2010. It seems that the problem is a change of the defined population. before 2010 it seems to refer to city population (https://www.citypopulation.de/php/mexico-bajacalifornia.php?cityid=020010001) and from 2010 onwards seems to refer to the municipality's population (https://www.citypopulation.de/php/mexico-admin.php?adm2id=02001).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alosapien (talk • contribs) 17:33, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  population 

message: Just wondering what % of the population is not Mexican.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.14.106 (talk) 07:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many from other countries such as USA? 

message: I can see there's been some history on this, but I think this city's article should have the name Ensenada, with the disambiguation page being Ensenada (disambiguation).  Are there substantial objections to this? —Steve Summit (talk) 14:16, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming again 

message: ive been living in ensenada all my life and ive never heard of this "major newspaper" called cachania.
also, el gringo gazette is not a major newspaper. the only major newspapers are el mexicano and el vigia. im going to replace cachania with el mexicanoKRISHANKO (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  cachania? 

message: The website for Welcome to Ensenada Baja Mexico  looks like Wikipedia is blocking it for some reason. Is there a way to find out why? Kortoso  (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website blocked? 

message: I went on a tour of Ensenada recently, and the tour guide claimed that fish tacos were invented in Ensenada.  I came here to find a "citation needed" for the claim as well, and it seems like a difficult claim to document.  Did manage to find this: https://www.npr.org/2007/09/12/14333245/in-love-with-the-fish-taco-and-its-hometown 136.52.102.120 (talk) 19:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  fish tacos
Talk:Amrit Desai

message: This entire article appears to have been copied from promotional material. There is no real autobiographical information, there are no sources and there is no balanced mention of the uncomfortable parts of his biography (i.e. allegations of sexual misconduct leading to his resignation from Kripalu).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Physteacher (talk • contribs) 20:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional material

message: I don't think Amrit Desai is a Buddhist.  As far as I know he's Hindu.  For example, if you google  his site, you get  a  few  hits for Hindu ( for example ), but none for Buddhism.  Are there any references to him being a Buddhist besides Ray Kurzweil (whom I don't regard as an expert)?
--ErikStewart 21:45, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Desai is certainly Hindu, not Buddhist. Lpgeffen 20:46, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Buddhist or Hindu

message: I removed the proposed deletion for now, mainly because the infoboxes indicate the page is maintained by the Gujarat workgroup, and they should be consulted at least for improvements to the article or evaluation of the proposed deletion before it comes down; particularly, to make sure something that seems "not notable" to Westerners but might indeed be perceived as notable by those more knowledgeable about the topic have a hand in its fate. It's worth taking extra precautions to keep WP from the systemic Western-culture sampling bias that would naturally tend from its domination of Western editors. If someone feels a pressing need to delete this article, I think they should do a regular AfD and post notice to the members of the Gujarat workgroup and a notice on the Wikiproject India.  - Reaverdrop (talk/nl) 04:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While reviewing the contested prod, I replaced the  that was accidentally removed with the prod.  The main problem with this article is there are no claims of notably in the article and there are no references supporting any notability.  I had actually considered this under criteria A7 for speedy delete WP:CSD#Articles.  A quick review for potential secondary references brought back a lot of hits, but nothing jumped out as a Reliable source.  I leave the potential for WP:AFD or showing WP:N to others.  Jeepday (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed proposed deletion
Talk:Seán Fortune

message: I think some care with the wording is in order, since AFAIK he was never actually convicted of any offence.  We should be especially careful with "paedophilia", since that further carries the overtones of a particular  psychological condition, rather than simply the fact of the actual abuse.  Similar concerns with "ephebophile", which also isn't a commonly-used term in connection with him, so is even more in need of putting in context (and/or omission).  My reworking is admittedly slightly weasly, so a source or two would be nice if anyone cares to add them.  Alai 21:53, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikidiagnoses and allegedlys 

message: I saw that documentary 'Suing the Pope'.Yes, Fr. Fortune was arrested & charged with child abuse & buggery,but he committed suicide before the case could go to court. - (Aidan Work 02:09, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fortune was arrested & charged.

message: To commit suicide is to commit a criminal offence.
The Samaritans and similar organisations strongly oppose the use of 'commit'; they prefer the use of neutral language such as: he took his own life, he died by his own hand, etc.
Korhomme (talk) 07:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide
Talk:Security Pacific Bank

message: hi.i work somewher and the guy he pay me whit one check ...is international money order from security pacific national bank and i want know if this check is good or not...ty
Well, it's a bit late now. It's been 4 and a half years since you posted your question. 3 years later the bank went out of business, so the money order is certainly no good now. It probably would have expired before then anyway. Hopefully you took it to a bank before it was too late and asked them. -Hccrle (talk) 20:57, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

message: Apparently this page gets read quite a bit. :-) Anyway, I am guessing that this self-promoting, but true, story would not be considered appropriate for the main article, so I am putting it here.
Earlier that year (I think it was that year), my company was considered by the same bank for the contract to beef up their computer security. I am referring to Computation Planning, Inc. (COMPLAN), a company I worked for, part time and full time, from 1974 to 1987, as a programmer. Obviously they chose Stanley Rifkin over us. We gave them a number of suggestions when we visited them on how to avoid hackers. They scoffed at them and did not adopt them. As a result, Rifkin was able to rob them the way he did. I am free to write about this only because the bank is no longer in business.
So what is the outcome of all this? Rifkin, after he got out of prison, became a successful computer security consultant, while we struggled to survive. COMPLAN went out of business about 12 years ago. The patent that we got in 1981 expired virtually unused (because we couldn't afford to enforce it) in 1998. I am convinced that if every company and government agency used it, the hacking incidents we read and hear so much about in the news would not have happened.
Me? I'm disabled with several medical conditions, chief among which are migraine headaches and a sleep disorder. After fighting the Social Security Administration (the first client I worked for when I was hired by COMPLAN!) for almost 3 years, I finally am on disability and Medicare as of late 2009 and I am still struggling to get on other programs.
In case anyone is interested, the U.S. patent I referred to is # 4,262,329. -Hccrle (talk) 21:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Rifkin Incident