Talk:Very-small-aperture terminal

message: I added a Technology section that describes the underlying technology in much more detail.  There is much confusion as to the implementation of the return path (or uplink) that I have tried to address in this section. --KJRehberg 19:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology section added 

message: I dont quiet understand why someone had linked the VSAT maritime part to BGAN and Inmarsat concidering they are L band based. I changed it to Vizada (Former telenor, page needed?) and Eutelsat. (Fredde87 (talk) 19:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated maritime 

message: Well, in the beginning of the usage section, it states that VSATs were operating at C-band or 2 GHz.  C-band is actually  4-8 GHz,and not 2 GHz.  Please make sure you correct the mistake, to those who wrote articles based on the information its time to go back and amend it for correctness  Lenamile C Pogiso (talk) 10:45, 27 November 2013)
good  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.131.117.90 (talk) 06:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  C-band? 

message: BGAN is typically more of a mobile satellite deployment. It offers more flexibility because it does not have to be pointed so precisely at the satellite, it can have a 15 degree variance and still work quite well. It does not offer the same amount of speed as VSAT but is a fast growing market because it can easily be transported and uses low amounts of power and in some cased can even fit inside a back pack. 
VSAT is able to handle a much larger through put however must be point precisely at the satellite. 
BGAN is like a flash light been which can cover a fairly large area, it works but it's not very concentrated. 
VSAT is like a spot light or laser beam. It's very focused, and it you miss your target you have a little you missed it completely. 
SatelliteOptimization@gmail.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.74.11.126 (talk) 20:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BGAN vs VSAT 

message: BGAN is typically more of a mobile satellite deployment. It offers more flexibility because it does not have to be pointed so precisely at the satellite, it can have a 15 degree variance and still work quite well. It does not offer the same amount of speed as VSAT but is a fast growing market because it can easily be transported and uses low amounts of power and in some cased can even fit inside a back pack. 
VSAT is able to handle a much larger through put however must be point precisely at the satellite. 
BGAN is like a flash light been which can cover a fairly large area, it works but it's not very concentrated. 
VSAT is like a spot light or laser beam. It's very focused, and it you miss your target a little you missed it completely. 
SatelliteOptimization@gmail.com
BGAN - inmarsat.com
VSAT - Hughesnet.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.74.11.126 (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BGAN vs VSAT 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Very-small-aperture terminal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110629025241/http://www.nasa.gov/offices/oce/appel/ask-academy/issues/ask-oce/AO_1-7_SF_history.html to http://www.nasa.gov/offices/oce/appel/ask-academy/issues/ask-oce/AO_1-7_SF_history.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100523033524/http://www.comsys.co.uk:80/vm1e_mn.htm to http://www.comsys.co.uk/vm1e_mn.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified