lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CAD standards

message: I think the introduction sentence is ambiguous. In my opinion this page should only talk on how the documents/data created by a CAD system should look like or contain, but not on how to exchange the data and in which format. For this we have the pages CAD data exchange and :Category:CAD_file_formats. So I propose to change the introduction in this direction. Lothartklein 21:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: This article needs to be clear about who's standards are being referenced.  There are documents that appears to be US Military standards which are not labeled as such and it's confusing as to if these are American standards, US Military worldwide or what.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.244.183.6 (talk) 12:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: who's Standards???

message: I removed the following info from the article. This info is to detailled. Only a summary of this info is acceptable. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: AEC Cad Standards info
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Copenhagen

message: I have deleted the information that the Roman Catholic Diocese of Copenhagen "has the distinction of being the largest Catholic diocese by area in the world", as the Archdiocese of Madre di Dio (Moscow) and the Diocese of San Giuseppe (Irkutsk) are larger. Hanno (talk) 13:46, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the largest diocese
Talk:Assistens Cemetery (Copenhagen)

message: Where does Ø fit in the Danish alphabet. My guess is that it does not follow the ISO collating sequence. --Ancheta Wis 12:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Danish alphabet: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXYZÆØÅ (optionally W after V) --Ysangkok 21:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: W isn't optional anymore. Dansk Sprognævn elevated it to full letter status in 1980 so the correct order is: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZÆØÅ Valentinian T / C 15:17, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oersted 

message: I changed it to say existential instead of existentialist philosopher. Although Kierkegaard would probably have rejected either label, existentialism is definitely not appropriate given Sartre's misinterpretation of existential philosophy and associations between existentialism and politics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgmk (talk • contribs) 09:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kierkegaard 

message: The current title (Assistants Cemetery) is a mistranslation of the Danish name. "Assistens kirkegård" is not a cemetery for assistants but a cemetery that assists other cemeteries (the ones inside the city with limited space). If it must be translated, "Assistance Cemetery" is much more accurate but doesn't seem to be commonly used. Hemmingsen 15:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Frederiksberg Gardens

message: The article says that the park is operated by Frederiksberg Kommune. If that is true then it is something quite new and very surprising for me. It is a state-property and operated by Slots- og Ejendomsstyrelsen. I have been working there. Mio Nielsen--82.125.51.191 (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Copenhagen Zoo Tower

message: Was it built to be like the Eiffel Tower? If yes, you might add the mention in the Eiffel tower article. --CopperKettle 10:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Eiffel?

message: I've added a prominent link from the Copenhagen Zoo article where an image of the tower exists. I've also added the tower to a list on the Lattice tower article under the section "Wooden lattice towers".  
I feel that because of these links the article is no longer an orphan, so I'm removing the old tag from the top of the page. If anyone disagrees with this decision I'm perfectly happy for them to place the tag back there, and I apologise. But until someone does come forward the tag is going. 000peter (talk) 23:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Added links from other articles
Talk:Vestre Cemetery (Copenhagen)

message: The name "Vestre Cemetery" is certainly a hybrid, or bastard if you like? Either it's Vestre Kirkegård, or Western Cemetery. Punkmorten (talk) 20:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather a late response :). I am happy with Vestre Cemetery as the name we expect English speakers to use (if of course it is) but it would certainly be useful to have a translation to both the full Danish name and of Vestre so English speakers realise that it means Western. Preferably without cluttering the lead too much... Mirokado (talk) 23:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Vestre Cemetery" 

message: "At the end of each cross arm is a 9 metre tall rust coloured iron gate." From the picture it looks like an arch rather than a gate (a gate can be closed). Can someone please check this? Mirokado (talk) 23:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake. I thought an arch was ...well...arched...as in no right  angles. Thanks for correcting me.:-)Ramblersen (talk) 20:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gate or arch? 
Talk:Yusuf Mohammed Siyaad Indohaadde

message: This page is the same as Yusuf Mohammed Siad Inda'ade.  - WilsonjrWikipedia (talk) 21:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have finished the merge. This article can now be redirected.  - WilsonjrWikipedia (talk) 21:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Church of Our Saviour, Copenhagen

message: The long quote has to go. Just inset a link to wikimedia or something like it Carewolf 14:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree -Beard0 15:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree - and... it's gone! Lilac Soul 10:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jules Verne quote 

message: The dates in the history section do not tie up and need careful revision.Ipigott (talk) 09:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates in the article
Talk:Invasion: Earth (TV series)

message: ==Untitled==
I've removed some language that is simply not encyclopedic about the companion book. Wikipedia isn't a review or opinion site. I appreciate the enthusiasm, the whole enterprise around this series was marvelous, but we have to remain objective, and just stick to the facts. 59.167.111.154 (talk) 12:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Fan language

message: I've removed some language that is simply not encyclopedic about the companion book. Wikipedia isn't a review or opinion site. I appreciate the enthusiasm, the whole enterprise around this series was marvelous, but we have to remain objective, and just stick to the facts. 59.167.111.154 (talk) 12:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who created the graphics? I've not been able to track this down, but in the mid-late 1980s IBM won an award for an animation of something that was similar (I'm not claiming it was the same) to the "hill" in this series. I think the film of IBM's output was titled "Mastering the Form" or something very similar, and suspect it was presented at SIGGRAPH in the same year as "Luxo Jr." (I saw them together in London). MarkMLl (talk) 14:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CG stuff
Talk:Robert Lee Bullard

message: I would like to see a page on Robert Bullard - The Environmental activist  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.75.71.133 (talk) 20:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A new book, <I>Betrayal at Little Gibraltar</i> blames Bullard for dooming an American assault on a German position in the First World War, yet your article makes no mention of the battle or of Bullard's possible culpability.  What gives?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.253.101 (talk) 20:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this information should be a part of the article.  It was addressed and then removed as hearsay and biased, yet I wonder.  I read the article which cited this culpability; the information was removed, and it too comes from a reliable, reputable source, Military History Quarterly.  Considering the 2016 book and the MHQ article, I believe the deleted information should be included back into the Wikipedia article.  Perhaps those sources that dispute the assertions of Bullard's culpability in dooming the assault could be located included by 75.110.31.135  who disputes the charges of Bullard's poor performance in assault at Montfaucon.  Both views can certainly and appropriately be presented.  Horst59 (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I altered the article to reflect the criticisms that were struck.  I understand that the criticisms are serious and scathing; they also seem to have adequate sourcing based on both the book and magazine article that are offered as citations.  Note that I did modify the disobedience to alleged disobedience.  Further modifications to this very well could include Pershing's involvement in the matter.  It too seems somewhat obfuscated and very well may include a cover-up as is claimed. But maybe that is better placed in the article about the battle itself.  Horst59 (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disaster at Montfaucon
Talk:List of S-train stations

message: List of Copenhagen S-train stations is a better list. And the name which doesn't include the City's name is confusing. S-train are exactly the same in Berlin, Hamburg and Copenhagen, all are infact of full Metro-standard. What's S-tog in Denmark i S-Bahn in Germany. The difference is that S-Bahns in smaller cities share tracks with other trains (like in Rostock, Magdeburg and elsewhere in Germany). Dispite Germany having both Metro-S-Bahn and non-Metro-S-Bahn, I still believe that S-train is the best English name in Denmark as well as in Germany. But we do not need two S-train stations lists for 
Copenhagen. 83.249.172.121 (talk) 01:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. This article contains nothing not found in List of Copenhagen S-train stations.--Klausok (talk) 20:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete It is also outdated and doesn't contain name changes such as Enghave to Carlsberg, and Gl. Toftegård to Egedal. A list of stations per line is kept in the various articles about the line and the articles about the railways. I have checked this List of S-train stations and it contains nothing that isn't in List of Copenhagen S-train stations, apart from outdated station names. So delete it right away, or replace the content with a redirect.--BIL (talk) 16:49, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete this list
Talk:Arken Museum of Modern Art

message: Hi all,
I have added updated information regarding the museum in terms of its architecture, notable collections and exhibitions Pishi25 (talk) 13:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Information added 

message: I think the first sentence of the article description lacks a citation  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuSu999 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed 
Talk:Catalog (album)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
:Catalog (album) →  – Insufficient disambiguation, see other albums listed at Catalog 162.208.168.92 (talk) 17:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We do, however, have Catalogue (Moloko album) and Catalogue (John Hartford album), which could lead to confusion. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 19:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I already put a hatnote on Catalog (album) to avoid possible confusion. Station1 (talk) 04:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

text: If the spellings were the same then I'd agree, but the different spellings mean that (currently) there is strictly only one album by this name.  This isn't a case of UK vs US spelling, pick whichever you like, these are proper names.  I would consider mis-spellings to form only a small proportion of hits, hence leaving this as primary for now.  Page hits are actually lowest for this title out of the three, but all are pretty low.  I'm not sure if redirects such as Catalog (Moloko album) would help or just create confusion.  Lithopsian (talk) 15:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to undermine my own point here, but it does seem like these small differences aren't usually disambiguated.  See Three Words (song) and 3 Words (song), Stand Up! (album) and 5 other albums named "Stand Up", Hold On! (album) and 4 other albums named "Hold On"... 162.208.168.92 (talk) 23:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. The relevant guideline is WP:SMALLDETAILS. - Station1 (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 April 2021
Talk:Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-6-23

message: "At present all aircraft in the Russian Air Force are flying with fully operational guns.[7]"
I checked through the article and found no such information. I believe this was misquoted anyway because it says ALL Russian aircraft and ALL are fully operational. I doubt that all Russian aircraft carrier this gun, and what aircraft do carry it I can't imagine they have a 100% operational rate. There has to be one of these things that is either malfunctioned, or in repair, ...
Tapalmer99 (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misquote percent operational
Talk:Søren Kierkegaard Research Center

message: Appears to be substantial overlap between the two organisations Rathfelder (talk) 23:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[International Kierkegaard Society]] 
Talk:News-Register (McMinnville)

message: Need to make NPOV, add outside sources. See WP:CITE and possibly WP:COI. Aboutmovies 07:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start class

message: It so happens one of the Bladines was recently editor of the Oregon Commentator, as was I. Ossie asked me to take a look at the article about his family's flagship paper, which he found wanting, as did I. So I pulled a wealth of new sources from Nexis, and also made some use of the newspaper's About page in overhauling this article; I think it is a substantial improvement. I plan to do more with the article, so just a heads-up in re: potential COI. And here's to the News-Register. Tough out there for a broadsheet. WWB (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 
Talk:University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences

message: The name og the Faculty is now Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences. Hence, the title should be changed to University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mokal89 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . --Dodi 8238 (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title should på changed.
Talk:Young Buck discography

message: There are some very serious changes as to the profits of various albums. Please look into the issue. I would apply a particular set of numbers, but I am unable to determine the correct values. Freedomlinux 00:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Profits

message: U Ain't Goin' Nowhere is the third single off Buck The World go look it up on Buck's site: http://www.young-buck.com
82.73.140.154 17:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: U Ain't Goin' Nowhere

message: put his mixtape's on there it's a big part of him man  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.183.48 (talk) 00:48, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  mixtape 

message: Should this recording be mentioned? Possible sources:     
—rybec 02:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still Ten-a-Key 
Talk:Quotient

message: Im in Algebra 2 and i forgot this, so i had to look it up!! Thanks for the quick info!
O.K. This information was helpful but my problem is confusing and this didn't really help the problem is: Divide 873 by 4 and write the quotient with a fraction!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.111.161.202 (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please sign your postings on talk pages with ~~~~. Have you read our article Fraction? A fraction is an expression of the form , in which P and Q are numbers, and it represents P divided by Q. If this is still unclear, the place to ask further clarification is Wikipedia:Reference Desk/Mathematics. By the way, anyone can edit and contribute to our encyclopedia, and we welcome constructive edits, but please refrain from making unconstructive edits like you did on the page Talk:Mathematics. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  --LambiamTalk 21:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

message: If I have a quotient and the divisor as the same number the total should be 1.  There is an exception for this.  For Example 6/6=1. Can someone help me with the exception.
Thanks
The exception is 0/0.
Anything divided by zero is undefined.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.225.57 (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotient of the same number exception 

message: Saying that IQ is referred to as a quotient does seem relevant, but the following sentence does not:
Could belong in the IQ article, but does it belong here? --Lex (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of example 

message: I removed this section, because "quotient" in intelligence quotient is from how it was historically developed, and doesn't really mean it's a result of division. As such, it seems irrelevant, unless the description is expanded to include other uses.--Jeff (talk) 15:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Uses" section on IQ, EQ, etc.
Talk:Boswellic acid

message: What is the basis of the statement "Caution is advised when using boswellic acids as dietary supplements, given the link between large doses of Boswellia extract and liver damage?" A recent article indicates in fact boswellic acids may have a hepatoprotective effect.  Y J, Kamath JV, Asad M.,Effect of hexane extract of Boswellia serrata oleo-gum resin on chemically induced liver damage.
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2006 Apr;19(2):129-33.
MoralDecay 21:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the statement, as it pretty much constitutes medical advice, and cited the Pak J Pharm Sci study. Fvasconcellos 20:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boswellic acids and liver damage

message: Acetyl-alpha-boswellic acid and acetyl-beta-boswellic acid, C32H50O4, replace the hydroxyl group with an acetyl group - that should be "replace the hydroxyl group with an acetoxyl group" or "replace the hydrogen of the hydroxyl group with an acetyl group"
2607:FB91:803:8310:E9FD:434C:981C:F0FA (talk) 18:12, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:August Bournonville

message: The bulk of this article seems to be missing. We jump from his studies to his death. TheOperaGuy (talk) 07:15, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career
Talk:J. C. Jacobsen

message: Stating:
Jacobsen's extensive personal art collection is now housed in the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, a museum in Copenhagen which was founded by his son.
Is that really correct? Jacob Chr. Jacobsen may of course have had a personal art collection, that may be part of todays Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, but it is definately not what he is known for. What is true though is that his SON Carl Jacobsen was a known patron of the arts and a very large art collector (mainly sculptures for his own private Glyptothek, which later  - correctly stated - was transformed into Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek) and that his (that is I.C. Jacobsens son Carl Jacobsen) private collections are now part of Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakobp (talk • contribs) 06:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amalgamated Bank of Chicago

message: 1.  Mostly taken from marketing fluff on the bank's web site.
2.  Leads to confusion between this bank, and the original Amalgamated Bank which (a) still exists, and (b) is still owned by the textile workers union (unlike the Chicago Bank).  --Sjsilverman (talk) 20:31, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with this page
Talk:Chana School

message: If I was a member of the Illinois Project, I would rate this article as Class A, Importance/Priority Mid based upon all the improvements it has seen. Many a couple more copyedits can bring it up to GA status soon. Ronbo76 13:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page rating 

message: Should this be Chana District School? (am unfamiliar with the topic, but the current wording seems wrong) Cricketgirl 09:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the actual district no longer remains, this is just the building that is historical. I am not even sure that a school district could be considered historical either.--Kranar drogin 10:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably depends on the disrict. Kranar is right though, this article is specifically about the school building. IvoShandor 18:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chana School District 

message: Well done, good references, enjoyable read. Automated peer review suggestions:
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 5 feet, use 5 feet, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 5 feet.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DoomsDay349 01:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Pass
Talk:Ogle County Courthouse

message: I have reviewed this article according to the GA criteria. The article looks good overall but needs a few things fixed before I'll pass it.
# Add wikilinks or further explain: cupola (intro), National Register of Historic Places & limestone (Third courthouse), oak (Interior) (also fix the white pine link in that section).--Kranar drogin 03:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Expanded a bit, may want to check it out IvoShandor and make sure it is what the article needs.--Kranar drogin 04:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two and a half open things left. I will check back in the morn and see if they were taken care of.--Kranar drogin 04:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA on hold

message: Good job on fixing all of these so quickly. It think that the inline citation (#6) was typed incorrectly as it has no text down in the references section, make sure to fix it. Besides that, I have passed this article as a GA according to the GA criteria. Continue to improve the article, making sure all new information is properly cited. For anybody that may read this, please consider reviewing an article or two at GAC to help with the backlog. --Nehrams2020 07:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA passed

message: *Oregon, Illinois: book
*The Diary of a Journeyman: book
IvoShandor 10:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible sources

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 10:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps (kept)