Talk:Siamese fighting fish

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Combattant and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 7#Combattant until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TraderCharlotte (talk) 20:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Combattant" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Siamese -Betta- fighter fish and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 7#Siamese -Betta- fighter fish until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TraderCharlotte (talk) 20:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Siamese -Betta- fighter fish" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Chinese fighting fish and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 7#Chinese fighting fish until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TraderCharlotte (talk) 20:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chinese fighting fish" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Japanese fighting fish and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 7#Japanese fighting fish until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TraderCharlotte (talk) 20:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Japanese fighting fish" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus not to move. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 20:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Siamese fighting fish →  – This appears to be the more WP:COMMONNAME since approximately the year 2000, according to Google nGrams.  Anecdotally, my personal experience matches this.  
In the previous move request debate, someone commented that "betta fish" was strictly American English.  If I refine the Google nGram to British English only, "siamese fighting fish" isn't even a result.  It gets ZERO hits.  This suggests that "siamese fighting fish" is actually the term that was exclusive to American English, and "betta fish" is the more general English term.
Currently, "Betta fish" is a redirect for "Betta", the entire genus, but it appears to me that the specific term of "Betta fish" is not talking about the genus as a whole, but specifically betta splendens, this page. I could accept an argument that searching "betta fish" in nGrams might be referring to the genus, except for the fact that "siamese fighting fish" isn't found in the British corpus at all. Fieari (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Support – I just wanted to say that I live in Canada and anecdotally, I've never heard anyone say anything other than betta fish. I've also followed a few fish fanatic groups online because I find them interesting and everyone there always calls them betta fish (and talks about the often cruely inadequate tank size people give them to live in and so on). So it's not just an American English thing, as the nomination has stated. It also seems like a good idea to avoid terms like "Siamese fighting fish", kind of like how the article about conjoined twins isn't under the title "Siamese twins" even if that had historical use. Also, this really does seem to be the common name so that's what the article title should be. Clovermoss (talk) 11:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Comment Google ngrsms is case sensitive, and "Siamese" is a proper noun. See this graph. William Avery (talk) 13:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also a button there for a case-insensitive search. Here is a link. There is also a way to select the corpus for the search. Regardless of whether that is set to British English or all English, it shows "Siamese fighting fish" as more popular than "Betta fish", but the former has been declining and the latter has been rising. I suspect, though, that these fish are often just called "Bettas" rather than "Betta fish", and the Ngram can't detect that. The alternative spelling "Beta fish" / "Beta" also occurs. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 15:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not the one proposing a change.  The burden of proof lies with the person wanting change. - Nick Thorne talk 10:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 July 2022 

message: — Assignment last updated by Vulcanalto (talk) 14:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Computer Science Principles