lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Constitutional law

message: In regard to the statement in the "Types of Constitution" section of the Constitutional law article -- is it an error or merely a colloquialism to state that countries such as the UK have an "unwritten constitution"? Anyone with knowledge in there area is welcomed to comment. Thank you! --Dpr (talk) 15:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unwritten constitution

message: Should it be merged into Constitution? --Osteology (talk) 14:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should it be merged into Constitution? 

message: There's currently a draft for a proposed Outline of Constitutional law article at Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of constitutional law. There's also a requested move discussion related to moving to draftspace if anyone is interested. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft outline 

message: There are some basics set of rules managements and different kind of impacts. parliament have power to make any kind of legal law . 119.152.51.52 (talk) 16:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do you know guys what is constitutional law? 

message: Is it illegal to commit bigamy Ecuador 2603:9001:1201:1555:C55A:F018:384C:2274 (talk) 21:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bigamy
Talk:Legislative Yuan

message: Is there a reason this is not showing the results of the most recent election in January? Not familiar with the system, maybe the new Yuan is not sitting yet? Akerbeltz (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jan 2016 election changes 

message: I could not find the number of women in the parliament (Legislative Yuan). Any lead ? Yug (talk) 09:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Representation / Women 

message: How is the fact that the Legislative Yuan is a branch of government opposed to it being considered a parliament? Are parliaments not considered branches of government? I don't understand the distinction that is being hinted at. LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 00:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Branch of Government vs. Parliament? 

message: Yulin dog festival 120.20.147.112 (talk) 07:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yulin dog festival it's cruel an barbaric up to government to change the ways of country people 

message: After the latest election, the new composition of the Legislative Yuan should be updated 129.65.145.17 (talk) 09:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2024 update required
Talk:Gish Jen

message: There must be an error of her year of birth (1999). User:kt2
She was born in 1956 in New York so being that is says 1955 is only one year off not a big deal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.151.192.150 (talk) 16:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm not sure this usage is correct.  I've always heard "first generation American" used to mean someone who immigrates from another country, and their children, like Gish Jen,  are second generation Americans. 
I'm thinking of editing the article for this, but I'd like to hear from the community first. 
Pithecanthropus4152 (talk) 21:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First generation American?
Talk:Adnan Khashoggi

message: There must be a mistake in the surname in English or in Arabic. It does not match. Should be corrected. I do not know which one is correct, but there is a big difference.
:There is no standard means of translating Arabic names into English. Because of that, Arabic names of both people and places are spelled in various different ways in different books and journals, which is highly confusing. For an example, the former leader of Libya, Colonel Gaddafi is also described as Colonel Khaddafi or Colonel Qaddafi in various publications. There is no correct version because it is entirely up to the translator to decide what version he or she wants to use, which probably explains the difference. --A.S. Brown (talk) 07:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: I wanted to edit the reference insert "Kasindorf, Jeanie (18 December 1989) "Stepping Out". New York Magazine. p. 44." as in Reference 29 of the Jamal Khashoggi article  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamal_Khashoggi#cite_note-29  and make it more specific but am unable to do so correctly. Here is the URL I wanted to insert: https://books.google.co.il/books?id=NugCAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA44&dq=Khashoggi+%22has+a+Jewish+grandfather%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjRkenl5MLuAhVuRhUIHT17BLEQ6AEwAHoECAAQAg#v=onepage&q=Khashoggi%20%22has%20a%20Jewish%20grandfather%22&f=false  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcljlm (talk • contribs) 05:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note, this source does not specify whether he claimed his "Jewish grandfather" was maternal or paternal. Only that he had a Jewish grandfather. Sseevv (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adnan Khashoggi's grandfather
Talk:Carbohydrate

message: Cursory inspection suggests that carbohydrate chemistry (which is not a strong article) should be merged into this article. --Smokefoot (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose Not necessarily. 120.16.218.233 (talk) 14:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: The article includes “ Other polysaccharides contained in dietary fiber include resistant starch and inulin”. Insulin is a polypeptide comprised of 51 amino acids. It isn’t a polysaccharide. 2A00:23C8:4303:7F01:F587:E225:1D37:4BBD (talk) 11:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to insulin 

message: How We Describe Sugar?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.213.69.3 (talk) 10:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology 

message: Change covalent bonds to covalent bonds. 92.31.194.123 (talk) 15:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks for the suggestion. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2024
Talk:Xinjiang

message: The article mistakenly states that 55% of Han Chinese live in northern Xianjiang. What the original writer probably meant was that 55% of "the Han that live in Xianjiang" happen to live in the northern area of Xianjiang. This is a massive difference. However, I am afraid to edit this, because I don't know how to phrase it. And also, there is a concern listed by an editor below about the Han numbers. So, if somebody with better abilities to handle this situation could do this, then that would be awesome! Here's the quote, just in case somebody needs to do a control-f search to find it: "Southern Xinjiang is home to most of the Uyghur population, about nine million people, out of a total population of twenty million; fifty-five percent of the Han population, mainly urban, live in northern Xinjiang." The semi-colon does not perform the function that the original author thought it did.
*I have revised the ambiguity you identify. JArthur1984 (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonderful! Thank you so much! I was busy and tired, and couldn't organize my thoughts well enough to correct it. Bravo! Logosrecieved (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My pleasure, thank you for noticing the issue and for your kind words. JArthur1984 (talk) 04:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Big issue with the phrasing in regards to Han living in Xianjiang towards end of history section

message: Quick disclaimer: I'm new to Wikipedia discussions and editing, so my formatting might be a bit wonky (sorry!)
In paragraph 11 of History —> People's Republic of China, the article discusses the CCP's "People's War" and the "Three Evil Sources" of separatism, terrorism, and extremism. This paragraph mentions a lot of significant events but doesn't provide any references until the very end where it talks about the Ürümqi rally. I find this lack of sources to be a major issue because it adds to the uncertainty about China's treatment of the Uyghur people.
To combat this uncertainty, someone who is smarter and better at Wikipedia than me should probably add some references :D Jamesofanarchy (talk) 22:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The source at the end appears to be the source for the whole paraphrase. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources needed for People's War Section
Talk:John Morton-Finney

message: I'm not really sure if Finney was the last remaining Buffalo Soldier. I've found that there is another man by the name of Mark Mathews, aged 108, who is still living, that served in this elite unit. Longevitymonger
:OK, I removed the sentence -- sannse 08:06 Apr 23, 2003 (UTC)
Me thanks you very much. Longevitymonger
:Mark Matthews now has an article, but Finney's status as a "Buffalo Soldier" is questionable ... that distinction properly belongs to someone who served in one of the four units specifically enumerated, or at least served during the Indian Wars or the Spanish-American War, but the consensus is that World War I veterans are not included in that group ... Happy Editing!   — 03:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I included the regiment's name, and its men were better known as the Buffalo soldiers, but maybe this needs more clarification in a footnote. Feel free to add one if that's needed using a reliable source. I couldn't find a paticular source that clarifies the designation to a particular group of veterans in the regiment. Rosalina523 (talk) 22:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Buffalo Soldier?

message: Not sure when his name became double-barrelled (ie hyphenated) but his family name was Finney. His first name was Morton and he seems to have adopted the name John as a young man. 
In his early adulthood, including in his military records, he's known as first name: John, second name: Morton, surname Finney.
121.200.4.180 (talk) 10:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: His name(s)
Talk:Katrina Leung

message: When I indicated she was a spy in the first draft of this article, though, I meant for the FBI- a fact which is not in doubt. --  jleybov  — Preceding undated comment added 20:17, 22 April 2003
It maybe worth a discussion to remove the "political conisderation"  section since it gives only single point of view with no conservative voice in dissent — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.49.224  (talk • contribs) 14:50, 4 January 2006
I remove the "political discussion section".  It's nothing but a one-sided political analysis and adds nothing substantive to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.5.152  (talk • contribs) 04:40, 23 March 2006
I too removed the politacal discussion section - same reason as above - MZ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.228.222.112  (talk • contribs) 17:46, 24 May 2006
Someone ought to go through the DoJ report about the case, since it is probably the most definitive account of the case (the press reporting here has some errors in it). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.93.105  (talk • contribs) 21:46, 9 September 2006
This link wasn't used in the article and doesn't appear to contribute anything important. 06:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does this article not mention the affair between her and Agent Smith? Sephiroth storm (talk) 23:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Affair

message: If Leung was born in 1954 in mainland China, how can she hold ROC passport since PRC was already in control of her birthplace well before that time? If her parents brought her to Taiwan or other places under ROC control, which enables her to get a passport from ROC, this is not mentioned at all. The point is, does she have a valid passport from ROC in the first place, or was it a fake? The other possibility was she was born and raised in mainland China, then came to US. --Happyseeu (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can Leung's passport be from ROC? 
Talk:Three-way junction

message: iwant to compute the volume of asphalt of 50mm layed at a t-junction.
208.78.63.48 (talk) 09:58, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  volume of asphalt  

message: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways#Right-of-way prose is scattered. --Chaswmsday (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right-of-way prose is scattered 

message: I don't suppose there's a better picture available? The current one doesn't actually show the three way junction, as one of the roads is completely obscured by trees. It seems a bit silly considering how easy it should be to get a better picture. - Alltat (talk) 12:54, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I am from Australia, where the term T intersection refers to roads where two roads form a straight line and the intersecting third road is perpendicular. It retains the term regardless of the size or traffic flow of each arm. Even where the road is broad and heavy traffic performs a right-angle turn and only a minor, low traffic road continues straight.
A Y intersection covers all other three-way junctions where no two roads form a straight line. The rare and un-named exception to this is where both angles of intersecting roads add up to less than 90 degrees. 
I believe the opening paragraph should read similar to this:
A 3-way junction (or 3-way intersection) is a type of road intersection with three arms.  A T junction (or T intersection) is formed when a straight road is intersected by another road approaching at roughly 90 degrees. A Y junction (or Y intersection) refers to all other angles of intersection where no two roads form a straight line. 
I have not updated the article, but open this for discussion, because my experience is limited to one country.
Eltimbalino (talk) 06:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Y junction vs T junction appears to be incorrect
Talk:Magnetoplasmadynamic thruster

message: I really strongly feel that this technology will advance the future of deep space exploration.
Ionocraft plus MPD plus nuclear or fusion reactors solves a lot of problems. Of course, the main hurdle here is sociopolitical, the START treaties prevent nuclear weapons in orbit and it would be pretty tough to define this craft as anything but. Besides who wants nuclear accidents in orbit? Only hope is relatively clean fusion Zalgo 07:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

message: So are PPTs and PITs classified as forms of MPD? They both harness the Lorentz force ina plasma propellant.
: no they are not classified forms of MPD. In fact, MPD, PPT and PIT, all belong the electromagnetic class of electric propulsion, as opposed to the electrothermal class (using electrical power to increase temperature of propellant), e. g. Arcjet, VASIMR, and to the electrostatic class comprising the Hall Effect Thrusters, Gridded Ion thruster and FEEP, which accelerate the plasma ions by applying a static axial electric field to the plasma.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guioseppe.rojma (talk • contribs) 00:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electric Propulsion Classifications 

message: The citations from Edgar Choueiri are great (100-500 kW, Ve 15-60 km/s, thrust 2.5-25 N, efficiency 40-60 %), but we really need a specific point of operation, not a range, in order to accurately compare with other electric-powered rockets. The sources don't give a point either, just the ranges. We cannot safely assume to take the low or high end of them all, because, for example, the upper measure of power may result in lower measure of efficiency. In short, we have no idea what a specific point of operation is, so can anyone track this down? DrZygote214 (talk) 01:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance metrics 
Wikipedia talk:Image description page

message: I didn't notice any standard format for image information pages, and I think it would be a great idea to have one. Please view an example of the proposed format by clicking the image on the right. Let me know what you think, and what changes you'd recommend, and if you'd like to see this format specification (either as a suggested or official guideline) on the main page. I simply think it looks neater to have the information divided up like that rather than in one blob (e.g. "this picture was taken by X at X on X"). The proposed format specifications are as follows.
Jeff 03:00, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Standard Format 

message: Pictures that can be enlarged by thumbnailes, will give you the detail screen. This means that pictures with a high resolution will exceed the size of the screen. Implementation with the "media" option is much better.
The argument for high res pictures is that they are public domain and there is a great need for such pictures. By uploading good quality high res pictures we provide a service.
The argument that they use up disc space is a fallacy. Yes they use disc space but the cost argument made sense 10 years back; now you buy a terrabyte for what a gigabyte used to cost..
The download time (client side) is also less and less of an issue. The pictures that are thumbnailed ARE small....
Thanks, GerardM 18:09, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thumbnailed pictures are badly implemented
Talk:Epoxyethane

message: I would like to propose making this page into a redirect to the (much more complete) ethylene oxide page, which is on the exact same compound.  This page here simply duplicates certain aspects of the other article, but the ethylene oxide page is (IMHO) of a much higher standard.  Any objections? Walkerma 05:23, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:First Lady of the United States/Archive 1

message: Can someone revert the last two edits to the article? Jill Biden is not yet FLOTUS. 45.251.33.39 (talk) 06:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Maka⭐(talk) 06:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended Confirmed Edit Request ( 10 - 11 - 2020 ) 

message: Please join a discussion here regarding whether the terms "First Lady of the United States Designate" and "Second Gentleman of the United States Designate" should be in the infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff, spouses of the president-elect and vice president-elect, respectively. We need to come to a consensus. Thank you for your participation. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about First Lady and Second Gentleman-designate titles in infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff 

message: If Doug Emhoff becomes First Gentleman in January (I say "if" because Covid-19, stroke, fatal heart attack is always plausible though very unlikely), the infobox in this article should read "Vacant" or similar. It should NOT call Mr. Emoff the "First Lady". Vowvo (talk) 22:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expected change 2021 - Mr. Emhoff should not be listed as a First Lady 

message: The "role" section currently discusses some of the first ladies' capacities and activities, but is far from developed. Most notably, it will continue to be swayed by a recency bias in the future if it's not expanded or amended. In addition, the "causes" section is currently just an incomprehensive and uncited list of initiatives. In order to amend this, I think they should be merged and developed to weave in the varying timelines of all of the first ladies to better explain how the role has changed over time. Tunestoons (talk) 02:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrate "causes" part into a more developed "role" section 

message: flotus is the first lady of united  states. who is the wife of the current president of that time. 117.212.76.168 (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  flotus
Talk:HCL Notes

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
----
:HCL Domino → ? – Due to WP:COMMONNAME and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC which sides more with 'Notes' rather than 'Domino'. (Looking at Google Trends also shows me that Notes has always had more searches with all three brands vs Domino). I propose either moving it to HCL Notes or have it as a compromise of HCL Notes and Domino. Chifonr (talk) 17:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 October 2023
Talk:Hernán Cortés

message: I Know Alot About Cortez And I wold Like To Put In More Facts In The Page 8.20.3.18 (talk) 17:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 19:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2023 

message: In the lede there's a mention that the woman he "used" as an interpreter later "bore his first son". Women do not "bore" offsprings for their men and the son was not just "his" - it is a demeaning language for women and it should be changed. For example "she gave birth to their first son" would be much better. Ellegony (talk) 15:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pregnancy of the interpreter 

message: skibidi rizz hernan 216.48.133.140 (talk) 17:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  sigma
Talk:Slinky

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. — SamX [talk · contribs] 04:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem