lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Newman Center

message: This is a good start to the article, but it's focus is largely Canadian.  Newman Centers are located around the world, and while this gives nice information about those in Canada, we need to talk about those all around the world.  I propose that we rename this article  Canadian Newman Centres and use the more broader Newman Center article to be the  distribution point to information on Newman Clubs, Society's, Centers, what have you, around the world. Mets 05:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't know what structure people are thinking of transitioning to.  I admit that the article is a bit disorganized.  I came upon it when I looked for information on the one in Tempe, AZ.  Since there wasn't any, I added the entry.  What of a table with just the NAME of the center, the LOCATION, the DIOCESE or ARCHDIOCESE it is a part of, and the PHOTO of it when available?  It would be in keeping with the the structure of other articles that contain lists (of people or places).  If I knew how to make tables, I would start that process.  Rafajs77 (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed many of the mentions of Newman Centers since Wikipedia is WP:NOTADIRECTORY.  Only significant individuals centers should be named.--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 13:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newman Centers List 

message: I moved the page to Newman Centers as that is how they are commonly known.  Also the spelling is Centers, as the Americanized spelling is preferred since the centers are largely in the United States.Malke 2010 (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are claiming under MOS:TIES that the concept of a Newman Centre has "strong national ties" to the USA, rather than the UK, Ireland, Canada, Australia? Really? I wonder what Newman would have made of that. You shouldn't just be counting, you shouldn't assume you are the judge of "how they are commonly known", and you should really show more common sense of the international context. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think John Newman would be very pleased that there is a Newman Center at nearly every American college and university, and that the Newman Centers form an impressive network that provide spiritual and social support for thousands of Catholic students, including students studying in American schools from 87 countries around the world.Malke 2010 (talk) 14:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: (And yes, I spelled Centre the Canadian way, since this topic is specifically about the Toronto site).
Could someone with better knowledge of the subject please confirm their affiliation with the "nearby" St. Thomas Aquinas parish? According to Google Maps, they are a bit over 6km apart, and there are at least two other churches along the route shown on Google Maps. I know that when I was a student at U of T, they were associated with St. Basil's on the U of T campus, although I admit that was a number of years ago.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.35.4.220 (talk) 19:37, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toronto Newman Centre
Talk:List of Picasso artworks 1889–1900

message: There is no way L'enfant de chœur (1896) could be these dimensions (6493 x 78432 miles). Is this a legitimate painting? What are its true dimensions?  Clerks 19:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This link (Picasso Fraud) says that the piece is 76 X 50 cm and has been incorrectly attributed to Picasso. I'm not comfortable making this call as I am not an art expert. Clerks 19:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: L'enfant de chœur?

message: Why are these works all divided up? Some periods only have a few works on the entire page. It's annoying, not helpful, and bad organization. I propose making a list of all works by date, which can be sorted alphabetically.-DMCer 13:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine Works 

message: This article is not formatted in a consistent manner, hence the addition of the cleanup template. The first three years are formatted as tables, the rest as bulleted lists. The page needs to be cleaned up for consistency. Fieryninja (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: After reviewing the page I am not convinced that the table format works for this page. This is a long list of works, with no wikilinks, details or images currently available within Wikipedia. The tables therefore appear to just create clutter and make the page even longer. I would therefore suggest we keep it simple as a series of bullet lists throughout. I can do this myself unless there are any objections. Thanks Fieryninja (talk) 18:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting
Talk:Night Safari, Singapore

message: Hey, I noticed you have taken an interest into adding the list of animals currently in the Night Safari. Would you be able to provide sources for these? Otherwise, the entire section will have to be removed. Thanks! Seloloving (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I did cite sources for most of said animals, the history section is completely uncited so I'll probably find some way to fix that later Worldbreaker550 (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for adding the sources. Seloloving (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of sources
Talk:Escape Theme Park

message: I have edited this article. It sounded like an advertisment, and was all taken word-for-word from the website. stil needs a more detailed guide of the rides, and a section on the recent accident leading to the closure of the only roller coaster at the park. ∆ Algonquin 04:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edit 

message: I have noticed the link in the website leads to an NSFW page. Could we remove it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.88.72.203 (talk) 11:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the Former official Website
Talk:Each-uisge

message: Should the name of the creature mentioned be capitalized? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.252.195.19 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 19 November 2006
: Yes, it looks like all the references caplitalise it, implying it's a proper name. So I guess that means there's only on Each Uisge, like there's only one Thor, but many pixies. 87.113.26.43 (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation

message: What's the difference between this and a selkie?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.43.208.100 (talk) 23:17, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Selkies are "seals", the each-uisge is more of a horse. Akerbeltz (talk) 11:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't mean to type Selkie. What I meant to type was Kelpie. It seems to be the exact same thing as described in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.43.216.58 (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good point, I never spotted that. Slapping a merge proposal on, feel free to contribute! Akerbeltz (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Selkie

message: Parson seems to be a marine biologist by profession. I guess "hawksbill sea turtle" does not occur so far north, hence his choice of leatherback sea turtle.</br>
You may want to clarify sources. Gordon (1995) appears to be Gordon, Seton 1995, Hebridean Memories. Glasgow: Neil Wilson Publishing  according to the Parsons article is viewable here  (pdf).</br>
And you might want to add that J. G. Campbell (1900), p.204 says "In Skye it was said to have a sharp bill (gob biorach), or as others describe it, a narrow brown slippery snout."</br>
Gordon's description of the feet was reminiscent of the "webbed feet" description I glanced in Varner's Creatures in the Mist, where Welsh scholar John Rhys cited. --Kiyoweap (talk) 11:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beak-like mouth (Skye) 

message: A question... must it always be male? Cant be female? I think I have read somewhere that there are also female each-uisges (or how to create the plural:D). Do you know? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.56.142 (talk) 14:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex 

message: A question: could it be also female? I think I have read somewhere that there are/can be females. What do you think? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.56.142 (talk) 15:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is two years after the fact but yes, females do exist according to Campbell even though most of the accounts are about the males. Females will carry riders into the loch and eat them just as the males will. Cerdic (talk) 01:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male/female?
Talk:M-132 (Michigan highway)

message: Where in the source does it say that we're talking about Henry Ford and not some other Henry Ford? Getting from there to it being the specific industrialist seems to require original research, no? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There's plenty of documentation that that Henry Ford was active in Dexter at that timeframe. He owned the adjacent Mill Creek property to rebuild the dam there to supply power to a  planned auto parts factory that was not built because of the Great Depression. For exact clarity though, consulting the Washtenaw County Register of Deeds, Liber 309, page 73, records the quit claim deed of one Henry Ford and his wife Clara J. Ford of Dearborn, Michigan, for two parcels of land in the Village of Dexter for the consideration of of $1.00. You may download said document for $1.20/page from the linked website. Since our noted industrialist was resident in Dearborn and married to one Clara Jane Bryant Ford, I do believe that adding a citation to the deed record referenced on the right-of-way map sheet should be sufficient. Imzadi 1979 →  02:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Ford 

message: where are you seeing that info? Is it on another page of the article besides the one which has been linked as the source page? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes that is a page other than the one citied. How does one get from "approved" (quotation marks expressing skepticism in original) to official in wikivoice? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  It could be just me, but "The three 'approved' routes" vs. "The three official routes" sounds the same to me. (Also, that link is in the citation) BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  To me those are entirely different statements. They aren't official routes, it fails verification. What is left is "was one of three recommended routes but not the most recommended one" which is so far into trivia that its just undue for inclusion. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football verification
Talk:1973 SEAP Games

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20160407020710/http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_2014-05-16_132924.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  /wiae 🎄 15:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:WSRN-FM

message: I removed the quote about being the oldest college radio station. WRUC makes that claim for itself,  starting over-the-air broadcasting in 1920. Unless someone has a reference for the WSRN claim, we should leave it out. Simon12 05:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well Swarthmore claims the station began as an amateur radio club in 1919, but didn't start broadcasting on AM until 1940.. Even the 1919 claim is not enough to say that it was the first college radio station, so the claim should be left out until verified. Simon12 05:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Carrier-current certainly isn't over-the-air, and arguably doesn't count as "broadcast."  Until the station went FM, its signal was available only to listeners whose radios were plugged into Swarthmore College's AC outlets. 174.31.218.42 (talk) 21:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

text: More history from the 1940s here:  Simon12 06:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The original carrier-current AM station was referred to as SN, the "Swarthmore Network."  This is mentioned in .  When the station was picking a callsign for its FM broadcast application, the initial W was already fixed by the FCC, and the addition of an R for "radio" made for a convenient backronym.  174.31.218.42 (talk) 21:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest?
Talk:List of major crimes in Singapore (2010–2019)

message: The list is incomplete as there are many major crimes (mostly murders) not being included here. It is exhausting to update this alone. For anyone interested to add old crimes committed, here are some possible sources:
* Straits Times' Court & Crime section for crimes from approx 2016 onwards - https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime
* NewspaperSG for older news articles stretching all the way from the 1900s - http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/
robertsky (talk) 09:17, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources of old crimes 

message: this list is about the list of crimes that occurred in singapore throughout the years from 2000 onwards. for this suppliment of the page, the main source of information are the newspapers. there are also other sources like the existing online grounds of decision (god) made by judges for crimes committed since 2000 and the TV shows re-enacting the cases (eg. true files, crimewatch)
however, some of these cases, probably most, their information are only available in newspapers, especially the most recent murder cases like teo ghim heng and gabriel lien goh, and some of these cases are also not being enacted in crimewatch (eg. the kovan double murder)
hence there would only be newspapers we all had to put details inside this page. ut is an error to say that it is a newspaper collection and not  an encyclopedia NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:33, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  objection to deletion 

message: I wonder what the actual purpose of this page is now. What constitutes a major crime and how do we know what qualifies for inclusion in this page? Do we list only major crimes, or less serious high-profile crimes as well?  --Blissfulclarity (talk) 05:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major crimes or high-profile crimes?
Talk:Cathay Building

message: Does anyone have any photos of the old Cathay building to upload? They would be a useful contribution to this article IMO. 222.165.42.62 (talk) 05:41, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs of the old Cathay building 
Talk:Church of Our Lady of Lourdes, Singapore

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore: Guide to Buildings, Streets, Places, by Peter Edwards, Norman, Keyes. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 02:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:History of responsa in Judaism

message: someone really needs to do a mjor edit on the orthodox part, it has a lot of things that aren't true (everyone is raised to accept the 613 mitzvot?  No, I don't believe in them and I know others who don't, what we believe is the immutability of overall torah law) and confusing passages (does "modern orthodox judaism" really mean "modern orthodoxy"?  The CYLOR phenomenon is definitely not limited to modern orthodoxy, perhaps the author meant modern orthodox judaism as opposed to earlier orthodox judaism?  This isn't true either.  I'll try to get to it myself but I may not be the best for it. 
Also, although I may not be happy about it, there are some important reform teshuvot from the 20thC, such as the conferring of semi-mikdash status on modern synagogues (see blowing the shofar on saturday et al.), consideration of American civil law, the theoretical authorization of female rabbis (1920s), status of transexuals, treatment of following orthodox minhagim (several, some as old as 1907) to name some off the top of my head.  I'm definitely not the best person for this, but aren't there any reform rabbis who wiki?  Avraham 05:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not one of the contributers for this article, but I would say go ahead and take your best shot.  If you wait for someone else to do it, it could be a very long wait...   Dfass 06:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know, I know.  I'll probably take a crack at the orthodox section but the reform one really should be done by a reform person, or at loeast sometone more knowledgable on the subject. v Avraham 06:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 20th C
Talk:Goodwood Park Hotel

message: *I felt that Goodwood Park Hotel is quite important in singapore history so reverted rating from Mid to high.--Quek157 13:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Killinger and Freund Motorcycle

message: There are two photos here:
http://www.motorbiker.org/blogs.nsf/dx/front-wheel-drive-motorcycles-existed-a-long-time-ago.htm
No idea of the copyright situation for the photos.  Benthatsme (talk) 18:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo source 
Talk:Tractor unit

message: I reduced "...between two and five axles" to "...two or three axles". I can find no references or photographs to four-, five- or more-axle prime movers. Four axles might occur either as twin-steer or triple-drive, but with "usually" earlier in the sentence, they are covered as an exception. --Scott Davis Talk 06:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Axle count

message: Company sales sites used to show types currently available, Volvo is excellent, showing different products offered in different countries.Sammy D III (talk) 01:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cab
Talk:Prime Minister of Singapore

message: Is the high pay of prime minister of Singapore a sign of corruption? Or linked to corruption or abuse of authority in any way? Vladimir Zezheng (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's his legally mandated salary, regardless of the disputes around it. High salaries are not limited to the prime minister position, and are extended across all sitting ministers, mayors and members of parliament. It's a hallmark of the Singapore civil service, with the government claiming that pegging civil servants' pay to the professional sector both attracts talent and reduces corruption. Seloloving (talk) 15:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corruption 

message: Please read Section 25 of the Constitution, where it details the role of the presidency in appointing the prime minister and the other members of the cabinet on the advice of the prime minister. Seloloving (talk) 19:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 25 of the constitution
Talk:Khoo Teck Puat

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 00:30, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:OCBC Bank

message: Suggest following the description on OCBC website for accuracy and consistency:
"OCBC Bank was born out of the Great Depression through the consolidation of three banks in 1932 - the Chinese Commercial Bank Limited (incorporated in 1912), the Ho Hong Bank Limited (incorporated in 1917) and the Oversea-Chinese Bank Limited (incorporated in 1919)."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.90.36.53 (talk) 00:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request minor edits to introductory paragraph regarding OCBC bank being founded by Lee Kong Chian.
Talk:Hesperocyparis goveniana

message: importance stems from california endemicism and the vulnerable status of the species. Anlace 06:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: assessment notes
Talk:Compound of cube and octahedron

message: This article was marked for deletion while I was expanding it. I believe I have fleshed out a stub sufficiently. I created this page to include more information than what can be given in the table at List of Wenninger polyhedron models. At some point I'd like to expand further into showing the theory of construction for stellations, and for now am starting with a few most interesting examples like this. Tom Ruen 06:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't understand a word you just said ;). I marked it for deletion because it didn't appear notable, and I nominated another one of your articles as well. I did so bcause they seemed like random info, but it sounded like you just showed that it is notable to someone. I'm not going to replace the tag, and sorry for troubling you. Cheers, -- THLCCD 06:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article creation