lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Damned Don't Cry

message: A lengthy, slanted, rather poorly written discussion of the film titled "Explanation" has been removed. 
This is an online ENCYCLOPEDIA, not a place to air pseudo-academic thoughts and theories. The information would be more at home on someone's blogspot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.223.136.5 (talk) 19:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Explanation" Section Removed

message: Should the exclamation point at the end of the film's title be used throughout this entry? It appears on the pictured poster, but not in the first sentence. Then it reappears at the end of the first paragraph.
So which is it? We should decide so we can be consistent throughout. (!) Thoughts, anyone? Kinkyturnip (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The exclamation point has been deleted from the article's main title header per the WP:Requested moves discussion, above. If any stray exclamation points still remain within the body of the article, those should be also removed.    Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:34, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper punctuation of title
Talk:One Hour with You

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Kateshortforbob talk 17:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Little Women (1933 film)

message: The article does not say if the film was made in black and white or color.  I would have thought that this information was basic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8084:255C:F200:518A:16AB:209F:26A6 (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bhowani Junction

message: does anyone know anything about there being two versions of this film? was there an english production of it and an indian version? Keltik31 20:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  two versions 

message: The many references to the movie should be transferred to that article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.8.53 (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article seems to be more about the movie than about the book
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Userboxes/Check for fair use

message: How exactly can I identify a fair use image? I went through the images in Wikipedia:Userboxes/Other (Just "Other" in the table); many of them say GNU, which I gather means we can use them in userboxes, but others have other tags. Help, please. --Fang Aili 22:38, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well anyway, I get the feeling no one's really paying attention to the Userbox project anymore. But regarding my confusion with the images, I've gone through a few categories, and if a picture said "fair use" then I deleted it from the userbox. Ones that were questionable, or said that they'd be deleted unless source info was found, I also deleted. --Fang Aili 00:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Identify fair use images?

message: Back in April/May/June of 2006 I went through every userbox then in existence for fair use image violations. I removed any that I found. I found the hit rate of violations to be about 2.5% of all userboxes. I recently did a review of just all boxes starting with Template:User A* and found 1.3% had fair use image violations, that after just a couple of months since the last check of that letter. In short, removing fair use images from userboxes by hand is not working. --Durin 19:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: All userboxes checked
Talk:Brad Dourif

message: The middle part of this has no citations and when looking for some references I found a copypase from althistory.fandom.com which is the exact opposite of a good reference.  I don't know which way the copy went but I think this needs some more investigation. Mtpaley (talk) 23:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Early Life section
Talk:Witness to Murder

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Does anyone have any information as to whether this movie inspired the [Mansun] song of the same name?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.97.109 (talk) 00:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mansun Connection
Talk:The Big Pond

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: I've done a fair amount of work on expanding this article, including putting in additional images.  One of the problems with film articles is that presenting the cast as a list, really the best way to do it, creates a lot of whitespace to the right.  That's why I like to put images there, if I can find them and make a rationale for their use.  The problem with putting them all the way to the right, however, is that if the plot section isn't long enough to push the cast section down below the infobox, the images will force the cast section down, thus introducing even worse whitespace between the "Cast" header and the cast information.  This may be ne evident when you view the image under a smaller resolution monitor, but with a sidescreen monitor (where the plot text takes up even less vertical space) it's quite evident.  This is why when I make those kinds of changes, I check them under both monitors settings to ake sure they work -- the goal being to have the article not have interruptive blocks of whitespace in it.User:Hru692 has been removing the formatting I've used to create this balanced presentation, thus creating one where under widescreen, disruptive whitespace is created.  I've asked the editor to discuss it on their talk page, but I've received no answer.  I'll post this message both on the article's talk page and on User:Hru692's talk page in the hope that the editor will come to understand the purpose of the formatting, and will stop reverting it. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 02:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've been repeatedly ignored in my request for a discussion with User:Hru692, who keeps reverting me.  I tried a different way of solving the problem I'm having with the way the article presents using Internet Explorer (a problem with Hru has not yet acknowledged exists), but it also was not ackonowledged and reverted, so I self-reverted to my originally solution, which is superior.I've suggested conflict resolution, but that suggestion has also not been acknowledged.  I'm rather at a loss about how to keep the article's layout in such a state that it works for me, without continuing to revert. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 06:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the placement of images in this article
Talk:Since You Went Away

message: *This movie reminds me of "I'll Be Seeing You", same year, 1944, with Cotton and Shirley Temple and Selznick.  What's the connection?  A spin-off in there?  They're very similar.  50.202.81.2 (talk) 07:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure how you can say they are "very similar" except for both being Selznick pictures starring Cotton and Temple and set during WWII. The directors are different, Cotton and Temple play different characters, there's no relation between the plots, Cotton is actually playing a returned shell shock victim from a mental hospital instead of a military man on leave, and "I'll Be Seeing You" has much darker themes in general since the female lead character is serving time in prison. TheBlinkster (talk) 10:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fourteen Hours

message: http://www.tnt.tv/title/0,,608415,00.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shraddha22 (talk • contribs) 06:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sitting Pretty (1948 film)

message: I realize articles have to be NPOV, but this one doesn't do justice to the film, which is surprisingly edgy and even a bit mean-spirited for a Hollywood comedy. Lynn Belvedere has unorthodox theories about child rearing, and isn't really that likable. I especially enjoy the scene in which a Robert Young declares that a neighborhood child who runs around collecting pollen (I forget the reason) should start a stud service. I don't know how that one got past the board... WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 14:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: better plot summary needed
Talk:Napkin

message: Interesting. Did you know there is a link to it from Rube Goldberg67.163.18.191 22:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not sure how people feel about this, but I'm of the opinion that 68.59.61.191's use of unusual terms in the encyclopaedia is a form of censorship.    As such, I'm going to be bold, and alter the euphemisms to their proper, medical equivalents.  
I think the fact that those links (chalice, and moontime) have to use hidden redirects (to vagina, and menses), should speak for itself.  And Deltabeignet, I 'd disagree with removing those comments altogether - that's also censorship.  -- (James McNally)  (talkpage)  17:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual terminology 

message: Canada...which one?. Newfoundland? i dont know why people always lump canada into one one category I'm in Ontario and the last time I heard the word serviette was probably some time in the very early 80's and it was used as a term for the paper kind.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starbwoy (talk • contribs) 06:04, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual terminology 

message: Hey folks, I'm removing
"Napkins were used in ancient Roman times to wipe bums."
because it is A. unsourced, and B. incredibly doubious. So, I'm removing it
Whatismoo (talk) 01:24, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the history, only the last three words were added a few days ago. I've restored the rest of the sentence. --McGeddon (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This seems fishy, so I'm editing it 

message: 220.237.67.203 (talk) 14:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as you have not requested a change.If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 September 2015
Talk:Hornblower (TV series)

message: Does anyone know which one of the books "Mutiny" is based on? I know the TV series does not correlate directly to the books, but if there is a similar plotline, in which book can I find it?
the novel "mutiny" and "retribution" is based on has the title "the lieutenant".
The book is Lieutenant Hornblower. 152.23.196.162 05:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mutiny 

message: I noticed that in episode 4, "The Frogs And The Lobsters" (a.k.a. "The Wrong War") Hornblower and some of the other junior officers wear their bicornes with the tips pointing to the sides (the same way Napoleon wore his), but in later episodes, starting at Retribution, I think, the hats are worn facing front and back, much like a cocked hat. Was just curious if there was any historical reason for this? I've tried searching via google but really couldn't find much history on the Royal Navy's use of the bicorne. --Edward Sandstig 18:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wearing the bicorne 

message: It was difficult to find a good reference about the future of the series.  There was no announcement from Meridian or A&E.  The referenced article interviewing Ioan Gruffudd seemed the most authoratative.  There were postings on fan sites and an A&E forum that seem to confirm that there is a decision to not make more.  There is even a petition to ask A&E to bring it back.  It is not clear why fans are not petitioning Meridian.  --Adastra1960 18:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Episodes
Talk:Harlow (Paramount film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Although Harlow's actual cause of death was kidney failure - as mentioned in the article - in the film it's said to be pneumonia.  Since the article is about the film, shouldn't it reflect that?  Thoughts anyone?   Elsquared (talk) 23:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  cause of death
Talk:Servicio de Lavandería

message: Servicio de lavandería, Laundry Service and Laundry Service: Washed & Dried are different editions of the same recording session.  All three should be merged to one single article.
Again, the Manual of Style clearly states that "capital letters are sometimes a matter of regional differences....If possible, as with spelling, use rules appropriate to the cultural and linguistic context; in other words, do not enforce American rules on pages about English or Australian topics or British rules on pages about American topics."  Spanish titles should be edited.  The page should be moved from Servicio de Lavandería to Servicio de lavandería.
English translations of Spanish titles are both unnecessary and clumsy. - Oskarg956 07:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge, Spanish title, etc.
Talk:Fire Over England

message: Ideology
The summary does not mention the heavy ideological bias of the film. At frequent intervals, the dialogue contrasts insular freedom with continental tyranny. Hardly any Anglo-Saxon viewer would fail to grasp the repeated warnings against Franco, Mussolini and above all Hitler. It is quite explicit that, just as in 1588, the England of 1937 will soon face overwhelming attack. The Lawless One (talk) 23:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

message: Originally Conrad Veidt was to star, but Alexander Korda saw the production as a star vehicle for Vivien Leigh, who was under contract to Korda.
:What is the connection? Would Veidt only agree to work on the project if he got solo star billing? Valetude (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star billing
Talk:Waterloo Bridge (1940 film)

message: The infobox lists budget as $1,164,000, domestic box office as $1,250,000 and foreign box office as $1,217,000. So if you add the box office and subtract the budget number, that is the profit, which is about $1.2 million. But the "Box office" section says the profit is $491,000. They are inconsistent. If the math is correct, there should be an explanation why the numbers differ. (e.g. production cost if over budget by $0.7 million, or profit sharing reduced company earnings.) --Happyseeu (talk) 17:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The financial data are inconsistent
Talk:Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance

message: I don't think such common words as capitalist, torture, black market, anesthesia and electricity need to be wikified. Everybody knows what they means and the linked articles won't really help someone understand the movie. Only relevant links, which will really enhance a reader's understanding, should be linked. For example not everybody will understand the significance of cutting a person's Achilles tendon, so that was a good link. I think in a plot description it is very distracting to see links.--ThreeAnswers 22:46, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Words

message: I've started on some references but the "Reception" section needs much more work.
More critical reviews and analysis of the movie by critics will flesh out the article.
Also any information on the production of the movie?
e.g. how long it took to shoot, edit etc. Stextc (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements - More Critical Reviews
Talk:The Roman Spring of Mrs. Stone

message: The roll of “young man” in the 1961 version of The Roman Spring of Mrs. Stone wrongly attributed to Rodrigo Santoro who is the actor in the 2003 film. Jeremy Spenser is the actor in the 1961 film with Vivian Leigh as Mrs. Stone. Check IMDB (Internet Movie Database)for verification under the 1961 film- cast. 2600:1008:B186:4B1C:A1FE:D6DF:B32:8DE4 (talk) 03:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction needed
Talk:Ship of Fools (film)

message: Moving this entence to Talk for now.
No cite. I don't know what "the French equivalent of the Oscar" might be. There is no mention of this in en Wikipedia or fr Wikipedia articles on Vivien Leigh, no mention in fr Wikipedia article http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nef_des_fous_(film). No mention of this in en or fr IMDB articles on Ship of Fools or Vivian Leigh.
"Vivien Leigh was awarded the French equivalent of the Oscar for her role."
-- Writtenonsand (talk) 02:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vivien Leigh: "the French equivalent of the Oscar" 

message: It may be noted that, in the film's opening credits, 27 cast members are listed. Below is a reproduction of the form in which the cast is depicted:
COLUMBIA
Columbia Pictures                  corporation                  presents
            A          STANLEY KRAMER          PRODUCTION
VIVIENLEIGH
SIMONESIGNORET
JOSEFERRER
LEEMARVIN
OSKARWERNER
ELIZABETHASHLEY
GEORGESEGAL
JOSEGRECO
MICHAELDUNN
CHARLESKORVIN
AND HEINZRUEHMANN
INA FILMBASEDON
KATHERINEANNEPORTER'S
KATHERINEANNEPORTER'SSHIP OFFOOLSCOPYRIGHT © MCMLXVBY COLUMBIA PICTURESCORPORATIONALL RIGHTS RESERVED
LILIA SKALABARBARA LUNAALF KJELLINCHRISTIANE SCHMIDTMER          OLGA FABIANWERNER KLEMPERER                    GILA GOLANJOHN WENGRAF
WITHOSCAR BEREGISTANLEY ADAMSKAREN VERNE                    HENRY CALVIN                 PAUL DANIELCHARLES DE VRIES          PETER MAMAKOS          DAVID RENARD
The on-screen closing credits, however, list 30 cast members, with the first 13 billed in the same order as in the opening credits. Christiane Schmidtmer, billed 15th in the opening credits, is raised to 14th in the closing credits and Alf Kjellin, billed 14th, is lowered to 15th. Lydia Torea, who was not listed in the opening credits, receives 24th billing in the closing credits and Henry Calvin, who was 24th in the opening, is lowered to 25th. Peter Mamakos, listed 25th in the opening, is dropped from the closing credits and Rudy Carrella, Silvia Marino and Anthony Brand, whose names were not listed in the opening credits, are listed 28th, 29th and 30th in the closing credits. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 20:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast listing in the closing credits does not follow the same billing order as in the opening credits
Talk:Captain January (novel)

message: Shouldn't this be a disambiguation page linking to two film articles? --Supernumerary 23:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. These two films should be on their own pages. Peter 03:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I made it a dab page. Check that I didn't mess it up.--Supernumerary 04:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Since it's actually a book, I rerouted it back from the disambig, and mentioned the two later films. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  02:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation?

message: My copy, which belonged to my great grandmother, has a copyright year of 1890 by "Estes & Lauriat."  And though the title page has the year of "1894" immediately below Boston Estes & Lauriat, it's inscribed "February 1893".
The years in my copy don't exactly line-up with the dates in the article.  Any explanation as to why.  Just curious. 2600:8800:204:C400:7088:1EE1:13F1:F556 (talk) 05:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years
Talk:Boycie

message: In the seance episode, Boycie mentioned that 'Aubrey' was his middle name, not his first name. And when was the name 'Terrance' mentioned? Just wondering.
In the green green grass he sez its aubry--Crestville 17:49, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Okay, we are now calling him Michael Aubrey Boyce? This article had him as Aubrey Terrance Boyce before that. Who is changing it and why!? We all know (see above) that his MIDDLE name is Aubrey, but where did Terrance go, and where did Michael come from?!?
In the Green Green Grass on the 5th March, it said his name was HERMAN Aubrey Boyce. What is his name??! Obviously John Sullivan keeps forgetting the names of his characters! x  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.170.145 (talk) 20:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In 'To Hull and Back' and 'Time on Our Hands' the car lot has a plaque with T A Boyce on it. Theladfromtheeast (talk) 12:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Blood and Sand (1922 film)

message: I was inclined to rewrite the plot summary, as it just barely fits with the movie (Carmen being Juan's childhood friend is never really explained in the film, but fine; and Sol never exactly exposes the affair so much as she just doesn't try to hide it, but sure, whatever. It just squeaks by in accuracy. If anyone thinks of a better way to describe the plot, maybe who has seen the movie more than I have (I saw it last night for the first time) then I might recommend you rewerite it.--68.35.94.119 22:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trigger (Only Fools and Horses)

message: Could somebody add the one where del is talking to the woman in the dentist office and she says somthing to del and trig answers.
I'd put it in myself but i'm not to sure on the fine details —The preceding unsigned comment was added by -the-muffin-man- (talk • contribs) 23:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triggers best bits 

message: Where do we ever learn Trigger's real name? 2.27.22.161 (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I always thought she was calling Mr James for his appointment, then asks "What's wrong with you, you moron?" Statto74 (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @Statto74  I thought the same. I know in another episode (possibly rock and chips) Trigger's grandmother is known as Alice Ball. I do know his Nan was married twice so her previous name may of been James or Trigger might of used a fake name at the dentist. 64.43.50.184 (talk) 18:56, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The 'autobiography' of Del Boy, 'He Who Dares', which was authorised by the family of John Sullivan per the front pages, states:
"My best mate at the time was a boy named Colin Ball. He looked like a horse, so he wound up getting the nickname 'Trigger'." I suppose that's as close to an official word on it as we're likely to get!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.115.229 (talk) 13:33, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colin Ball 

message: Ship of Theseus page mentions Trigger's Broom and "Trigger" of course links here, but there's no reference to his broom on this page. 147.78.5.38 (talk) 18:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trigger's Broom