lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:USB flash drive

message: More than one year ago, I added a section to this talk page. At the beginning of the article, I found a source about the 2 TB limit for flash drives from 2016. I am pretty sure that I have seen flash drives with higher capacities so I was going to ask for someone to update the beginning of the article.
I checked back again and the date was only updated to 2018. I posted that section in March of 2022, more than a year ago! Could someone please yet again update the USB storage capability?
Thanks, ItsCheck (talk) 01:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find any serious USB stick with more than 1 TB. Larger devices are SSD based. --Zac67 (talk) 09:29, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  USB Stick Storage Capabillity
Talk:Stephanie Bedwell-Grime

message: I admit to being somewhat thrown by the author's website, which provides what appear to be covers for what are, in fact, electronically available short stories. I wonder whether it might not be a good idea to remove these short stories entirely. Although I have, on occasion, seen individual short stories included in Wikipedia bibliographies, they are absent from the great majority of entries. Moreover, I note that the handful included are only a small percentage of those published (and I haven't even touched upon Bedwell-Grime's poems and articles). I'd be interested in hearing from others concerning this issue. Victoriagirl 19:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen short stories listed on other author pages; I think they are useful. I think the reason they are usually excluded is because they are hard to find, not because they aren't notable. It could be that someone (could have been me) added these because they were linked prominently from the author's site; I also think that they may be longer short fiction (novella/novellette length), not just short stories. Avt tor 20:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Published works
Talk:ARP Odyssey

message: Dear ApolloBoy, if you bother checking out the few music videos of "Love Action" by the Human League on the internet, you will find that they did use the ARP Odyssey. --Skraelinger 19:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

message: According to Gordon Reid,the first duophonic was the Musonics Sonic V, the precursor to the Moog Sonic 6. His reasoning is a little patchy - he believes there are only minor differences between the sonic v and sonic 6, and duophony is not one he is aware of - so I won't place this claim in the article, but I will remove the claim that the odyssey was the first, as i think this has been thrown into serious doubt Melaena (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sonic 6 was introduced in 1974, a full three years after the Odyssey hit the market. No serious doubt here that I can see...Vonbontee (talk) 08:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the first duophonic

message: link goes to 'frankenstein' on which EW famously played an ARP-2600 with its separate keyboard on a long cable, worn around his neck like a guitar.
there are videos of this, but never mind that- the page linked to in the list in this article, intending to highlight his use of an odyssey, tells us "2600".
also- no mention here of the creamnware 'prodyssey', an earlier hardware clone of the odyssey.
duncanrmi (talk) 13:09, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  edgar winter, creamware
Category talk:Ghazipur

message: This category will act as starting category for grouping pages related to Ghazipur at one place and will also act as networking place to help improve pages related to Ghazipur. May be wikipedian can create a new user category e.g. Category:Ghazipur Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively. Vjdchauhan 19:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective and localized collaboration
Talk:Great Expectations (1998 film)

message: I added some content to this stub.  I'm not sure how to site sorces, so if someone would like to help me out, please do.
MoonKnight52 19:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Why is Pip renamed to Finn in this movie adaptation? Prottos007 (talk) 02:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pip 

message: In the first paragraph of the "Synopsis" section it says:
:"The police sees the small boat heading out to sea."
This is incorrect.
If the police saw the boat with their eyes it would be:
:"see"
If the commandeered the boat it would be:
:"seize"
I am not sure which one you are trying to say here, and I have not seen the film.
4.240.159.160 (talk) 05:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sees, see, or seize
File talk:Google.png

message: well, I want to know if I can use this image to the spanish wikipedia. I ask that, because I've no idea about copyrights and other legal stuffs. I hope you can help me, Thanks --190.137.210.73 19:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

message: In order to respect the fair-use guidelines, I am going to lower the resolution of the logo so that this picture will not be deleted. The same rationale used for the Apple logo applies to this as well. 
The use of a low resolution version of this logo constitutes fair use in the Wikipedia article Google because:
    * The low resolution nature of the image prevents reuse which could infringe on the commercial benefit of the copyright owner;
    * The image and the product it represents are critically discussed by the article;
    * Google has willingly published such images to represent their products.
I hope this is acceptable to all parties involved. –-  kungming·2 (Talk) 07:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion, Fair-use rationale. 

message: I saw that in many other images related to Google brandname (Google Earth, Google Maps,...), all of them are tagged with  and . Why is not this image? Vinhtantran (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free or Free? 

message: I see that every time the SVG tag is added it gets deleted. Why should this not be an SVG? --Ysangkok (talk) 22:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is 3D rendered; it includes rendered shadows, rendered surfaces (colour, lighting), etc. This cannot be replicated in SVG format. A conversion to SVG would therefore by necessity be both pointless and inaccurate - and the latter could indeed violate Google's trademark rights. Google itself does not distribute a vector version (instead it distributes a high-resolution TIFF for press purposes). Stannered (talk) 23:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure it can. SVG can have rendered shadows and textures and all that. There's just no reason to convert it and making it render perfectly accurate would take a lot of work. 71.155.241.250 (talk) 04:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to attempt it for some reason. There's a really high-res version here. 71.155.241.250 (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SVG 

message: Are there any sources for the new logo? I can't see it on google.com, neither is there a blogpost.—Totie (talk) 19:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Google logo (13 December 2009) 

message: I would transfer this file to commons due to its copyright status (PD-textlogo), but it is a great responsability for me and I want to make sure I do nothing wrong. Please tell me, is the file eligible to be transferred at our commons: store? Thanks. Gikü (talk)
:In the vast majority of cases it would be. In this case, the old curmudgeons over in :Commons have decided that for some reason this image does not meet their standards of PD-Ineligible (without much explanation other than "we have to be sure!" and other such FUD). So it's staying here for the time being. Stannered (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfer to commons
Talk:Bereitschaftspotential

message: The "Outcomes" section is in huge violation of WP:NOR, it seems to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.248.113 (talk) 01:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP: NOR

message: I got here via Benjamin Libet. I wonder if this should link to his work as a "see also". It seems strange for this page to discuss the intense interest in BP regarding free will, and not mention Libet's experiments.  --Jorend 19:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to Libet?

message: This sounds alot like the smith predictor in a control network, actually I red somewhere that there actually is a similar mechanism in the brain, anybody have some reference?
41.241.131.30 17:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Smith Predictor

message: "EEGs and EMGs are used in combination with Bayesian inference to construct Bayesian networks which attempt to predict general patterns of Motor Intent Neuron Action Potentials firing. Researchers attempting to develop non-intrusive brain-machine interfaces are interested in this, as are system analysis, operations research, and epistemology (e.g. the Smith predictor has been suggested in the discussion)."
A citation or two on this would be great.
--131.252.214.20 (talk) 18:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cites for Bayes Net studies?

message: The citation requests for this section go back to 2008. I propose to delete the uncited material. It looks like undergraduate notes, without the benefit of looking up the evidence. The use of the words 'consciousness obviously is switched on' is suspiciously unscientific. Myrvin (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. As no one has contested this suggestion, I've gone ahead and deleted it. Dependent Variable (talk) 08:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free will
Talk:Sexo, amor y otras perversiones

message: The summary is a direct translation from : http://www.esmas.com/espectaculos/cine/peliculas/516460.html. Probably ought to flag it, but it will be a difficult case to make since it requires a bilingual administrator. It's a battle I don't feel like taking up at the moment. Sadangel 19:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pura Belpré

message: The article states that she was "the first Puerto Rican librarian in New York City" or a "pioneer..." . This, like other passages in this bio, must be referenced. I've tagged the passage.
Also, there's a passage saying she is "well known for her work in the New York Public Library". I don't think this is even referable. Sounds more like folk knowledge that encyclopedic language. Would someone volunteer to rewrite that? --damiens.rf 11:30, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first Puerto Rican librarian in New York City 

message: The article use some references sometimes connected with some passage (like this[1]) but sometimes not. It should be made consistent. We need to know what the last five references are supposed to support in the article. --damiens.rf 12:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References sections 

message: While I noticed that one of the sources mentioned the date of her death, we still need references for the posthumous awards mentioned. --damiens.rf 12:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death and awards 

message: The source "Latina Legacies : Identity, Biography, and Community" says that there's scarce biographical information about Belpré, and her place of birth is said to be Cidra based only on an essay she wrote. I put that (lack of) info into the article. --damiens.rf 12:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 

message: I am rewriting the references to use the available templates and unify the format. Any problem? --damiens.rf 12:27, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formating references 

message: I removed the External links section because every one of them are rotten links that lead to Error 404 pages. Some problem? --damiens.rf 12:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  External broken links 

message: It that encyclopedic language?
"Belpré's name lives on in the fields of Latino and American librarianship and Latino and children's literature as a source of inspiration."
This makes the section sound as a homage to Ms. Belpré. Wikipedia is not a place for that. Is it ok if I remove that? --damiens.rf 12:47, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homage language 

message: The article states that she wrote the "first major Juan Bobo story published in the United States", but the reference is just a link pointing the reader to buy the book at Amazon.com. That does not supports what is said. I tagged as such, for a while. But the information must be removed if not properly referenced. --damiens.rf 12:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first major Juan Bobo story published in the United States
Talk:Serpulidae

message: Just created article. Shrumster 19:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created Article

message: Currently there is no subfamilies mentioned, but one is Spirorbinae Chamberlin, 1919 (formerly Spirorbidae)--Estopedist1 (talk) 19:54, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Subfamilies
Talk:2006 Norwegian Football Cup final

message: I appreciate the work that went into this article, and other sports-related articles, but I would strongly recommend that the creator(s) review certain Wikipedia policies, especially Wikipedia:Verifiability.  Any information that is added to Wikipedia, must also include a source to indicate where that information came from, so that other editors can verify the data.  Though it's tempting, Wikipedia should not be used for Original research.  Another useful link is What Wikipedia is not.  And if you have any questions, let us know!  :) --Elonka 19:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References needed
Talk:Henry E. Bliss

message: The article may be improved by following the WPBiogaphy 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 01:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:List of WKRP in Cincinnati episodes

message: Well, I corrected an oft misquoted phrase and Clarityfiend reverted it without comment, so I'm opening this up for discussion.
In the "Turkey's Away" episode, Les Nessman, who often misspeaks, starts emulating Herbert Morrison's coverage of the Hindenburg disaster.  In Morrison's coverage, he screams the famous phrase "Oh, the humanity!"  I just listened to the "Turkey's Away" audio and it's clear to me that Les Nessman gets it wrong (as usual) and screams "Oh, the humility!"
Clarityfiend apparently disagreed, but it's not clear to me whether or not Clarityfiend is basing his opinion on secondary sources, memory or a recent hearing of the episode.
Fellow editors, before commenting, please listen to the audio of the episode yourself (at 2m22s).
Pursuant to the Wikipedia "Disruptive editing" guideline, I am reverting Clarityfiend's edit.
--Danorton 20:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I listened to your audio snippet several times. I hear "humanity". Also, a Google search brings up many hits for Les Nessman and "Oh, the humanity", none for "Oh, the humility". Clarityfiend 23:02, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for responding.  We are hearing differently.  Absent significant discussion from others, can you please specifically cite the secondary or tertiary sources?  (c.f. Wikipedia Reliable Sources)--Danorton 23:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No got. Guess we humans will have to humbly await the votes of other ears. Clarityfiend 01:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I have a good copy of the episode and I have heard this carefully and I hear "humility". It is a slip-up by Les but I am sure it is Humility. Dangerouslydead 22:31 03 November 2009 (PDT)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just listened to the linked-in clip above, and I clearly hear "humanity." Sorry, Danorton and Dangerouslydead. To be fair, the Google search results don't prove anything but general, widespread belief, regardless of its accuracy. --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh, the hu??ity!  

message: While watching this episode tonight (thank you, American Life TV!) I noticed that the list of songs here was incomplete. While adding the missing song and putting them in the as-aired order, I noticed that most other sites list the first band as "The Boys." And, yes, there was a UK punk band by this name contemporary with the series but they never released a song called "Too Wild To Tame." However, there was a midwestern US rock band called "The Boyzz" that released a song with that name in 1978. The band is long gone but Dirty Dan Buck is still active and maintains an official website complete with discography. If anybody has a contemporary printed source, preferably an industry or trade publication, that can either confirm or deny this, a reference would be greatly appreciated. I think too many online sources are going on the sound and relying on other online sources that did the same thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dravecky (talk • contribs) 07:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Contest Nobody Could Win songs
Talk:Hylopetes

message: Do H. lepidus and H. platyurus really have the same common name? Rigadoun  (talk) 19:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nothing at Flickr for the whole genus - have tried all species. Richard001 (talk) 00:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:David Astor

message: Reference to Myra Hindley need condensing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.17.190 (talk) 13:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much emphasis on Myra Hindley 

message: The phrases "like Lord Longford" and "the likes of Lord Longford". These phrases do not strike me as neutral in tone nor encyclopaedic; they do not supply any factual information. They do not tell us who is like Lord Longford or what qualities or characteristics are attributed to Lord Longford.truthordare (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopaedic phrasing
Talk:Richard Boston

message: "belligerent pacifist"
Belligerent means war-like. How can you be a war-like pacifist?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.30.140 (talk) 12:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The words are ironic. He held strong beliefs, and could be hectoring in their support! —Saltmarsh 05:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense
Talk:The Fast and the Furious (2006 video game)

message: When I looked at this article again it has been vandalized. Since when does Bentley and Ferrari go under the Acura category and why isn't the NSX in the Acura category. Also I see a Dodge in the Chevrolet category. I have reverted the edits made by Ghost-robber. Xtreme racer 15:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: This article has now come under two separate acts of vandalism. One from Ghost-robber and one by 86.139.163.83. Ghost-robber has already been dealt with. Now we need to deal with this IP address. If people could please become more involved with this article so we can get it improved that would be greatly appreciated. Xtreme racer 19:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:Owlfly

message: As a note, Jones 2019 agrees in part with the phylogeny derived by Machado et al 2018, but opted to elevate groups to family level, rather than making a much expanded Myrmeleontidae.  They redefined superfamily Myrmeleontoidea to include the (hypothetically monophyletic families ) Myrmeleontidae + (Palparidae + (Stilbopterygidae + Ascalaphidae).  phylogenetic and taxonomic papers on Myrmeleontidae and Ascalaphidae in 2020 and 2021 are split on which approach is used with Subfamilial placement and Familial placement both in use.  As such I feel we should step back from moving groups to tribal level and add additional text to the effected articles where phylogenetic treatments differ between the two camps.--Kevmin § 17:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Um, I've simply documented both Jones and Machado, so there's nothing to "move back" from. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   Actually,  has already gone through all the Ascalaphid subfamilies and moved them to tribal level, and is in the process of changing the automatic taxoboxes on all the genera etc. as well, so there is a fair bit of discussion to do still.  I pinged you in since you have been a large contributor to the family level articles. (Also you have the older Jones, and not the more recent Jones 2019).--Kevmin § 17:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I won't touch the taxoboxes myself, but am inclined to agree that they shouldn't go tribal until there is scientific consensus. I've added Jones 2019 and arranged the Machado and Jones trees to point up the differences as clearly as possible. We are lacking images only of Albardiinae and Melambrotinae - if you have anything usable (preferably with white background) then please add them here. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Phylogenetic instability
Talk:WinAir Airlines

message: There seems to be an issue with the ISBN of the book Deregulation Knockouts: Round Two.  I know the search for it doesn't come up with anything.  I have the book and that's the ISBN given in it.  The book is published by Airways Magazine, so I wonder if that's part of the problem finding it.  -- Hawaiian717 20:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ISBN issues

message: 71.219.128.132 today made a big addition to this article: .  Before I go in and cleanup the addition, I wanted to get a couple of people to look at it and determine if its something we can keep.  For one, there are some claims in there that look like they'd need to be sourced, but aren't.  They might even be hard or impossible to source.  Second, while the editor was anonymous, he did sign at the end with the name Richard L. Winwood, whom as noted was the chairman of the airline.  Assuming it really is him, could this lead to problems with WP:COI and possibly WP:OR if it hasn't been published elsewhere? -- Hawaiian717 04:44, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition by 71.219.128.132
Category talk:Raebareli

message: This category will act as starting category for grouping pages related to Raebareli at one place and will also act as networking place to help improve pages related to Raebareli. May be wikipedian can create a new user category e.g. Category:Raebareli Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively. Vjdchauhan 20:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective and localized collaboration
Talk:Edmonton Grads

message: Why are next to none of the players named on here? I get that Page is going to be in every article that talks about the grads cause original sources from the time will just focus on the man, that's the bias. That doesn't mean we can't recognize them. FanOfCJSiev (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey