Talk:Acceptance

message: OLD: Acceptance is a cognitive activity or state that is the opposite of resistance.
I feel like a more specific definition with perhaps an example or a personal experience of feeling acceptance would be good to add here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evelynvpizarra (talk • contribs) 05:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...does anyone else find the last paragraph in this articel suspicious? It sounds strange to me... 68.39.174.238 17:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WRT the last comment above... 

message: The section on self acceptance seems to me as having an inappropriate tone, especially the use of the second person (as if lecturing the reader).
Tony0964 (talk) 03:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self acceptance 

message: At the bottom of the Types section there is an odd line that reads: "Acceptance (12 Step definition).. To believe as fact..."
This is meaningless. I would just delete it except I am new to wikipedia editing. Perhaps it can be expanded upon and also referenced. As it stands it is just noise. Wham! Bam! Splat! (talk) 14:19, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Acceptance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212221847/http://gettingpastyourpast.wordpress.com:80/2007/07/31/the-last-phase-of-grief-reorganization-integration-and-acceptance/ to http://gettingpastyourpast.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/the-last-phase-of-grief-reorganization-integration-and-acceptance
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080703230929/http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/publications/allpubs/SMA07-4257/default.asp to http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/publications/allpubs/SMA07-4257/default.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521223950/http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/cultural/religion/judaism/beliefs.html to http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/cultural/religion/judaism/beliefs.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Acceptance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110314072458/http://www.qaem.org/wp/what-does-islam-mean/ to http://www.qaem.org/wp/what-does-islam-mean/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090420132940/http://www.essortment.com/all/stagesofgri_rvkg.htm to http://www.essortment.com/all/stagesofgri_rvkg.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://gettingpastyourpast.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/the-last-phase-of-grief-reorganization-integration-and-acceptance/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I like the article because it gives some better explanations about the different types of acceptance. I feel that it can help others realize that there are different types as well. For me, I was a little bit confused about some pictures, so maybe add a little more information about them too. Amvang (talk) 06:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki EDU  

message: The sections "Public Acceptance," "Social Acceptance," "Cultural Acceptance," and "Parental Acceptance" explicitly show the POV of a person, even going as far as to use first person pronouns ("To use the same example as I did for public acceptance, the difference between..." and "As the example we are using the LGBTQ+ community"). Moreover, it keeps promoting the acceptance of the queer community, which regardless of one's reason or opinion, is not the purpose of Wikipedia and should be removed. 
I believe examples of acceptance are reasonable, but when the queer community is the only example, it's clear that the author's purpose is not to inform but to push a certain political position on a site where that is discouraged. 68.111.104.244 (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explicit POV