lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crawling in the Dark

message: I corrected the release date and the genre, it was not released in 2001 and it is not alternative metal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rashempashem (talk • contribs) 11:28, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong release date 

message: Please discuss and reach consensus on what the genre field should contain. For your convenience, I link and recommend here policies and guidelines such as WP:Verifiability and WP:Reliable sources as well as those linked therein. Hope this helps. Samsara 11:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Possible source for nu metal being a genre: http://teamrock.com/feature/2017-07-04/the-top-40-nu-metal-songs-of-all-time
Mes tex (talk) 04:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, along with the NME source. Binksternet (talk) 19:00, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

text: In 2002, Spin magazine said the song was a "new wave metal hit", which I interpret as "nu metal". Any disagreement on that? Binksternet (talk) 22:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre decision
Talk:Remember Me (Hoobastank song)

message: Corrected some minor errors, added some information but I guess it remains a stub. Rashempashem 13:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 
Talk:Gender binary

message: This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Fall 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lyoung11. 20:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tap3y9 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: — Assignment last updated by Jackchen314 (talk) 14:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies-16
Talk:Rico Suave (song)

message: He's from Michigan?  Why, then, does Gerardo's wikipage say he's from Ecuador and he moved to California when he was twelve?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindsay123 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Michigan
Talk:Tim Goad

message: Hello!
In addition to fixing some grammatical/syntax issues and adding wikilinks to your article, I  removed some language that is typically frowned upon on wikipedia (i.e. the fact that his high school team was bad is not something that needs to be put in the biography of Tim Goad). I noticed you had sources for where Mr. Goad played some of his seasons in the NFL, but the material that covers where he was born, went to high school, played college ball, etc need references in order for the biography to remain on wikipedia. I just wanted to give you a heads up before someone tried to delete your article. If you would like any help with this, I would be happy to do so!
Best,
Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 23:12, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pegasus A.F.C.

message: I have got hold of the Ken Shearwood book on Pegasus.  I'll try and find a few choice facts to round this page out with Bakert (talk) 18:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Digital delay line

message: You say that the digital delay line 'is a discrete element in digital filter theory'. It seems that it is only a theoretical signal processing element, without any connection to real applications. Nevertheless, at the end of your article you have a paragraph ('Commercial history') where It is evident that some applications are in use. I would make clear in the initial definition that these elements are not only theoretically modelled, but used in practice. Gps1810 (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is true that it is virtually non-existant standalone as application, but always as a component to some other more complex scheme. So, theoretically, being a mainly theoretical element is true. Finding good sources that explicitly mention this type of delay lines as component in current commercial products could be a good future addition! Magiwanders (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead paragraph 

message: The article conveys the message. However, I have the feeling that it is oriented only to somehow expert readers. I am sure that the Theory paragraph is needed as it is, but it might be useful to expand the practical application side, to make it more accessible to a larger audience. Gps1810 (talk) 13:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That section is the original article, I added the theory, which is arguably something that you encounter only if you study it as engineer, never from the other side, that of musicians. So yes, it absolutely makes sense that there should be a thorough research on the products currently on the market implementing it, it would make the topic more accessible. Magiwanders (talk) 14:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  General comment 

message: Nice work in summing up all the interpolation techniques and it's very nice to have a complemetary article to the one I wrote. I don't have many comments since we discussed them beforehand. Primoh (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review
Talk:Quebec Gatineau Railway

message: At what point (mile post) does the Chemins de Fer Québec-Gatineau connect with the Canadian National Railways at Quebec City? Peter Horn 02:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Junction with the CN

message: CBC News reports: "Freight train derails crossing Rivière des Milles-Îles between Laval and Terrebonne" The bridge is the Sophie Masson Bridge, but that link is just a redirect to List of crossings of the Rivière des Mille Îles. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  04:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derailment, October 12, 2017
Talk:Plymouth United F.C.

message: This article is currently dominated by information about a Sunday League team that apparently has no relationship with the original Plymouth United team, or with the second team formed in the 1940s, other than sharing the name. Personally I think everything to do with the Sunday League team needs to come out of this article, but my attempts to do this were reverted without explanation by an IP editor. I'm inclined to repeat my previous edit, but have no interest in getting involved in an edit war, so before I do that has anyone else got any opinions on the current state of this page? — GasHeadSteve [TALK] 21:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunday league team 

message: That was Plymouth Argyle. So I am removing that information. I am reverting back to the PROD. Unless an article can be created about the team from 1944 then this should be deleted. Please see the talk on the football project. Govvy (talk) 07:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This team was not founded in 1888 
Talk:Myxocyprinus

message: Myxocyprinus asiaticus is a cold water species (range is 18 to 25 C). It does not do well in a standared aquarium setup. Most rasbora and danios like water a bit too warm for them, as does the SAE. After I find some citations, I would like to edit this page, but I am a bit shy about doing so. There are other pages as well that have information that would lead people into not providing the proper environment for fishes they would like to keep. I have some thirty years experience keeping fish, including a few where I profesionaly taught and advised. I would like to contribute if I could, but I want to do it the right way, preferably after I have talked to someone first so for now I'll just leave a comment.
24.21.174.244 (talk) 03:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerned about the advise given for tank-mate compatability. 
Talk:Special master

message: Just wanted to point out a rather interesting section of this article.
If you read the main body of this article, it says that special masters are often criticised as being tools of an overreaching and overly powerful judicial branch. The response to those asserions in the the courts often find the actions of the special master valid
Am I the only one who sees the irony? Kiyae (talk) 09:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism of Special Masters

message: This article implies that the Masters of the High Court in England & Wales are equivalent to the description of "Special Masters" provided. They most certainly are not. They excercise full judicial powers in making procedural and costs orders in complex cases.
Urbanmyth139  —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflation of Special Masters and Masters in England & Wales

message: "US-only legal concept" is not accurate since Special masters have existed in England for several centuries. Their equivalents probably exist in other jurisdictions influenced by the legal system of England and Wales.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 12:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extent of usage 
Talk:Féodor Atkine

message: :When sourcing is non-existant on an article and a basic minimal search does not produce results to make a clear determination of stand alone status, an article can be subjected to AFD. This is a 2007‎ article that has been tagged since 2010 as needing additional citations. IMDb is generally not a reliable source (there are some supposed exceptions) per Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Resources#Questionable resources, WP:RS/IMDB, and Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites#IMDb. The "Life and career" section is unsourced and tagged since 2009. WP:NEXIST includes:  
:I found one source (Behind the Voice Actors) to back up voice acting but I do not think that is insufficient.  Otr500 (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: shown as appearing in the TV show "Sharpe" as Ducos. 173.252.14.205 (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Centre Square (building)

message: Looks like this article is the building named Centre Square, but Philadelphia's Centre Square more appropriately refers to one of the five original squares mapped out in the city. Perhaps this should be renamed to Centre Square (Building), and another article should be made to refer to the actual city square.
chsh (talk)  21:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building vs. 5 Squares of Philadelphia 
Talk:One South Broad

message: This section has the belll in two different buildings – this building (One S Broad) and then-Wanamaker's main store (a block away). If the bell did hang in both buildings, when was it moved to One S Broad? Eagle4000 (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder's Bell
Talk:1700 Market

message: This should be 1700 Market Street, not just 1700 Market. If there are no objections, I will change it. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:28, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1700 Market Street
Talk:Old Haa Museum

message: Shetlopedia is copyright free - see the original article here. http://shetlopedia.com/Old_Haa_Museum --MacRusgail 03:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Was up til September 2007! (In spite of pinching much of their material from wikipedia to begin with - without acknowledgement!)--MacRusgail (talk) 18:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Predate

message: I propose deleting the definition of predate when intended to mean 'prey upon' as it is unnecessarily ambiguous. Adrian Doesburg 03:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's one of the definitions of "predate". It belongs on the disambiguation page, in my opinion. Leebo T/C 03:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hand tool

message: hammer and saw is not a good example of laborer tools, these are examples of carpenter tools. An example of laborer tools is a shovel and construction bar or wheelbarrow and asphalt rake is another.Granite07 03:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: The handtool description differentiates hand tools from tools powered by as motor.  In history,  and perhaps in less developed locations,  some tools are water or animal powered.  These would not be hand tools, but also would not be motor powered. 
Should this destination be made here? 
 foxkid (talk) 00:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a three way distinction: hand tools, power tools (hand held) and powered machinery (floor or bench mounted). Animal and water power has been used for machinery, but not for hand-held power tools. A few rare hand tools were powered by a human pedalling or cranking them, but these were rare. The pedalled part was fixed, there was a flexible drive (usually a rope drive over a number of pulleys) to a hand piece. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handfuls vs. Powertools vs. Animal or water power tools 

message: Hand tool 181.177.218.34 (talk) 22:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industrial arts
Talk:Maryland Route 38

message: A note about the southern endpoint: According to MDRoads.com, MD 38 crosses into West Virginia as WV 46. I checked Google Maps, and it says it crosses over as WV 42. I used MDRoads as the source for that endpoint. If anyone knows the correct answer, please correct the endpoint. Algorerhythms 03:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jakob Jakobsen

message: Is "Thomas Edmondston's glossary" correctly linked?
* From the article Thomas Edmondston: "Thomas Edmondston (1825–1846) was a British-born botanist, born in Buness, Unst. [...] Thomas Edmondston's uncle, also Thomas Edmondston, was laird of the Buness estate on Unst and host to many scientific visitors to Shetland., [...] after his death, his parents named another newborn son Thomas." That is, there are at least three persons named Thomas Edmondston and the article only covers one of them.
* The glossary mentioned probably is: An etymological Glossary of the Shetland & Orkney Dialect with some Derivations of Names of Places in Shetland (Partly Read at Two Meetings of the Philological Society in the Spring of 1866) by Thos. Edmondston, F.R.S.L., F.A.S.L. of Buness, Shetland. Edinburgh, 1866. By the year, this was probably not written by Thomas Edmondston (1825–1846; botanist) and not by Thomas Edmondston (uncle of the botanist Thomas Edmondston, laired and host) but by Thomas Edmondston (younger brother of the botanist Thomas Edmondston).
-84.161.48.189 (talk) 23:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  correctly linked?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kent/Assessment

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Kent
Talk:Chatham Manor

message: This article appeared to be mostly copied verbatim from the National Park Service website on Chatham Manor.  While government documents are in the public domain, this seems unusual for Wikipedia.  Additional sources would be welcome.--Parkwells (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad this article is up for GA status, and probably can't review it for that status as needed because my changes in 2015 and 2016 removed this problem. IMHO, I don't believe the Virginia Low-importance tag deserved, for the reasons I stated in the revised lede.Jweaver28 (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Literal copy
Talk:1992 April subtropical storm

message: Good work. GA it if you can.Mitchcontribs 11:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good work

message: Just to get it overwith. Everything is passable, but I'm just gonna fix an error in one of the external links. good job hinkman.Mitchcontribs 15:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: Although I made this, I'm second-guessing its notability, especially since the List of off-season Atlantic hurricanes has become a much better article on handling generic off-season storms. There was no impact, and I think it could easily be merged. Any thoughts? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. I think since there is little content and the author himself no longer supports keeping it, we should merge this article.--12george1 (talk) 04:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:List of National Historic Landmarks in Kentucky

message: Although "List" is in the title, this article not be set aside as class=List and left unrated.  It should be rated as an article on progression from Stub to Start to B-class, then to Featured List.  I am rating it as Stub consistently with ratings approach that was discussed (although not to consensus, and then it was archived) in the Talk page of WP:NRHP. doncram (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Upgrading to Start, now that there is at least a stub article for every one of the NHLs that it indexes. doncram (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment as an article

message: This week: George T. Stagg Distillery and Camp Nelson Historic and Archeological District. Sorry, I don't have time to try to modify the chart. — Eoghanacht talk 16:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two more 
Talk:CSX Rigolets Pass Bridge

message: This Article http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/01/new_highrise_rigolets_bridge_o.html
is about the opening of a new Rigolets Pass brodge, but appears to be a different one. Can anyone clarify the confusion ?
GrahamHardy (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Nola.com article is about the replacement for the Fort Pike Bridge which carries US 90 across the Rigolets.  The Rigolets Pass Bridge article is about the rail bridge about 6 or 7 miles to the east where the Rigolets meets Lake Borgne.  VerruckteDan (talk) 22:37, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More than one ?

message: I see, from what I think I found on Google Maps, that this bridge has a movable section.  What kind of structure is this bridge?  What sort of movable section does it use?  And did I find the right bridge? - Denimadept (talk) 21:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The bridge you tagged with coordinates was not the correct bridge.  You tagged the Norfolk Southern Pontchartrain Bridge.  The Rigolets Pass Bridge is further to the east and I have corrected the coordinates to the proper location.  The Rigolets Pass Bridge is a truss bridge with a rotating section to allow for marine traffic.  The Ponchartrain Bridge is a trestle bridge with a draw bridge span for marine traffic.  VerruckteDan (talk) 22:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd seen it, but not thought it was long enough, as I just commented on your Talk page.  So this bridge is a truss/swing type.  Perhaps we should create an article for the other one, too. - Denimadept (talk) 04:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure type
Talk:Rafflesia Forest Reserve

message: English language resources on this location are tourism based and not news sources. Maybe readers of Malay may be able to find more fact based descriptions of the location and plants. LetsTalkAboutBears (talk) 01:17, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very little English language info 

message: I added an image of Rafflesia flower bloomshttps://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Rafflesia+Forest+Reserve&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Go&type=image. Does this seem alright to be included in the article? UniversalAlien (talk) 21:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: the Commons description says it is of a plant in Sumatra, so probably unsuitable for inclusion here. Thanks, Declangi (talk) 00:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Declangi: Thank you, I’ll remove it. UniversalAlien (talk) 04:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Rafflesia pricei is a specific species in the Reserve. Perhaps a geographically closer image might be this. The description says it's in the Crocker Range/Mountains, a large area which would seem to include this Reserve. Declangi (talk) 09:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the image. Thank you! UniversalAlien (talk) 12:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added image
Category talk:Municipalities in Centre-du-Québec

message: Missing:
* L'Avenir, Quebec
* Lefebvre, Quebec
* Saint-Albert, Quebec
* Saint-Bonaventure, Quebec
* Saint-Célestin (Municipality), Quebec
* Saint-Cyrille-de-Wendover, Quebec    
* Sainte-Anne-du-Sault, Quebec    
* Sainte-Clotilde-de-Horton, Quebec    
* Saint-Eugène, Quebec
* Saint-Félix-de-Kingsey, Quebec
* Saint-Germain-de-Grantham, Quebec
* Saint-Guillaume, Quebec
* Saint-Norbert-d'Arthabaska, Quebec
* Saint-Valère, Quebec
* Wickham, Quebec
- Lotheric 22:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:7th Airlift Squadron

message: The archived link to "62d Airlift Wing History Office" merely links to a desctiption of the offide, and does not support the material cited.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid citation