Talk:Wayne McCullough

message: I really like the way this article has developed since two months ago when it was just this stub; it's looking really good now. Congrats to all those who have contributed. I just have one doubt. Is it true that Wayne was boxing for Ireland when he won his silver medal? Considering he was born in Northern Ireland and fought for N.I. in the Commonwealth Games, I would have thought he would have gone to the Olympics in the United Kingdom team. Can anyone clarify this? --GringoInChile 15:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure of the reasons why, but McCullough did compete for the Republic of Ireland in '92. Maybe he wasn't offered a place in the British team. He's a protestant from the Shankill Road, making it one of the rare instances of religion staying out of Northern Irish sport. Stu 09:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 06:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: This guy is not American.  It would be tenuous enogh to include his nationality as only American even if he had applied for it, but he hasn't as far as I'm aware, and he definately isn't a "naturalised" American citizen.  I hate to disappoint any "Irish-Americans" but he was born in Belfast and that's were he learnt his trade.  This isn't the 19th century where you can claim anyone who strays into your country and stays there for more than six months.  If your home-grown white fighters aren't that successful for a country with 221.3 million caucasians, try not to take away from other countries.  Anyway surely he'd be "Scotch-Irish".
:"Scotch-Irish" - is most likely his ethnicity not his nationality. Wayne has an American passport and the "nationality" field in the info box clearly showed that its by way of naturalisation. Also, please take snipey comments about US boxers to a boxing forum if you wish as they have no place here. Thank you.--Vintagekits (talk) 14:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What dispute am I in? some IP with a couple of edits tries to say "Scotch-Irish" is a nationality and then makes an edit with providing a source and starts talking nonsense on talk pages. I simply reverted the edit and add an explanation as to why this was done. Now he seems to have reverted this - have I rereverted? no - because I am not going to get involved in a dispute. I am going to let someone else sort out his bullshit! As for who the IP is - it would possibly only take a few guesses! slan agus slainte.--Vintagekits (talk) 21:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be a good idea. I already proposed to Rlevse that he block the IP if we can figure out who it is. In fact, I will personally revert any edits from a sockpuppet you can name. However, just because you discredit the opinions of the other person does not mean it's a violation of the terms, which this undoubtably is. The Evil Spartan (talk) 21:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "which this undoubtably is" - eh no! how is it? Maybe you should go away and read BLP and then come back to me!--Vintagekits (talk) 21:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the block, Rlevse, probably a good idea under the circumstances.  I understand what you are saying here about the citizenship thing, it's right at the edge of the restriction; correcting factual errors in a BLP is something that shouldn't be a problem, and he did bring it to the talk page when his correction was reverted, so I'm hard pressed to say it went as far as being a dispute. On the other hand, it's likely this won't be the last time that incorrect or unsourced information on nationalities is added to one of VK's articles in the run-up to the Olympics, so it might be an idea to develop some sort of process for him to bring other eyes to the situation.  Perhaps we should retire to Vintagekit's talk page to hammer out something. Risker (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After I saw, Vintagekits' response, I came to the same conclusion. As for future citizenship issues, I strongly suggest he discuss on talk pages first, otherwise, you're correct, we'll end up in this situation again.  — Rlevse • Talk •  13:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

text:  Vk pretty much did the right thing here, I'd say. If, after being reverted, he can't resolve a nationality dispute by discussion, all he has to do is draw the attention of an admin familiar with his conditions to the situation. Rockpocket 17:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: Having seen this issue return, I took the simple step of trying to remove the section from the infobox entirely. First off, there is no definition of the term "nationality" that is relevant to a boxer. Does it mean the country he was born in? The one(s) he is a citizen of? The one(s) he has represented? The one where he lives? The one where he works?  Of all of those possibilities, the only one relevant to the work of a boxer are countries he has represented and the only one relevant to the life of a boxer is the one(s) of which he claims citizenship.  Unfortunately, it seems the infobox parameters are inflexible and demand an answer to this question. As a result, I have reverted back to his current citizenship, which is United States. The parameter needs to be rethought, however, and if I get motivated enough I will take it to the relevant project to discuss.  Risker (talk) 13:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality Round 2

message: I added a tag to the page. This page is receiving numerous edits from User:Sillyjun. Sillyjun claims to be Cheryl McCullough. Her user page states, "Please do not change anything I add to the Wayne McCullogh article". Someone needs to keep a close watch on this page, and someone needs to explain to Sillyjun that that isn't how things work here. Joefromrandb (talk) 06:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, see User talk:Sillyjun Zarcadia (talk) 09:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As the COI edits seem to have ceased, I have removed the tag. Please do not hesitate to return it immediately, if necessary. Joefromrandb (talk) 07:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI 

message: I came here out of nostalgia. Like most Irish people, I remember Wayne in the Olympics very well. However, it seems very odd that his Olympic status does not get a mention in the introduction to this article. 79.97.154.238 (talk) 00:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Olympics?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wayne McCullough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20080103102545/http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/article3213502.ece to http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/article3213502.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've seen McCullough and he's 5' 5" at most, still tall for a Bantamweight boxer. He's nowhere near 5' 7". Billsmith60 (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a citation from BoxRec. For future reference, try and avoid arguments such as "I saw him, he's not that tall"; they will almost always be ignored per WP:Original research. – 2.O.Boxing 10:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height