Talk:CG(X)

message: If the only difference between the non-nuclear CG(X) and DD(X) is more VLS tubes, wouldn't it make more sense for them to turn it into "Block II" of the Zumwalt destroyer class? It would be much simpler if it was one single production line instead of two, if that's the only difference. Is there any other differences not mentioned in this article, because I'm failing to see why this ship would be called a cruiser. 70.137.169.123 (talk) 06:42, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason this is not called a cruiser is becauser its role is way different than that of a cruiser. Cruisers protect shipping and wage warfare against smaller and equivalent vessels. Destroyers kill subs. Missiles have been added to give them both a land attack and detterent capability. It definitely gives the USA a way better diplomatic and military asset than any old cruise missile-less boat. But I agree with you. It definitely is a offshot of the DD21 research program and Block II is more of a name, except there would be a lot of problems with classification symbols and there would probably be a lot of confusion. It may be that the USN was looking at this possibility. Jeremy Wang 22:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Cruiser"

message: As of 07 AUG 2009 the GAO is still looking at the economics of the propulsion system decision within the Navy's Analysis of Alternatives.  I think there should be some discussion of this process and maybe the pros and cons (once the GAO report is finalized) added to the article.
Reference here: Defense Acquisitions: Additional Analysis Needed to Capture Cost Differences Between Conventional and Nuclear Propulsion for Navy's Future Cruiser
--tom (talk) 17:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of Nuclear or Non-Nuclear Propulsion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on CG(X). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090219085757/http://www.chinfo.navy.mil:80/navpalib/.www/rhumblines/rhumblines634.doc to http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/.www/rhumblines/rhumblines634.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on CG(X). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423160951/http://opencrs.com/document/RL32109/2010-02-26/?24684 to http://opencrs.com/document/RL32109/2010-02-26/?24684
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified