Talk:Wideband Global SATCOM

message: I'm unsure what to do about categories for this article, as it is about the system as a whole rather than just the satellites. Any suggestions? (Sdsds - Talk) 16:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You know that's actually a good point, one in fact I never really considered.  The article does in fact try to address the constellation as a whole, rather than deal with an individual satellite.  But by comparing it with the excellent page on GPS, they've decided to make the article all inclusive.  As such, maybe we should consider categorizing it in a similar way. (Kronik overkill - Talk) 16:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: From the Australian newspaper
Unsure if this is the right program please verify add?
Looks right it says 5 in article then says australia paying for one of the six.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.65.142 (talk) 20:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia buying into program buying one themselves? 

message: I removed the following and refered it to the talk page, as I think there maybe a mixup between WGS and the AEHS system. It can be replaced when and if there is an official USA statement linked to it, does everyone agree ?
After the United States and Australia also some other countries have intrests in the programme, on October 10th 2011 the Dutch Defense minister Hans Hillen announced that he would join the group of international partners for the WGS programme following Canada, Denmark , Luxembourg and New-Zealand. All will be paying for the 9th satteliet together with de United States 
112.213.152.52 (talk) 03:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Partners 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wideband Global SATCOM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070108061443/http://www.afspc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5582 to http://www.afspc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5582
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Greetings,
Yes, I'd update the link myself, however there's a choice to be made between two new links and I'd rather the original contributor select which is more appropriate.
The original lead to this page, which generates a 404 error.
http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/news/article.page?doc=canada-s-participation-in-the-wideband-global-satellite-communications-system/hgq87xyn
A search suggests:
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/news/2017/03/new_satellite_toenhancecommunicationscapabilitiesforcanadianarme.html
or
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/maple-leaf/rcaf/migration/2017/new-satellite-will-enhance-canadian-armed-forces-communications-capabilities.html
Cheers Sailargh (talk) 04:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update of link for Canadian participation