Talk:Fanny Bullock Workman

message: As per the main editor's request on Facebook, I'm reviewing/copyediting this article.  I prefer to do a more formal review, through GAC, but this being a special case--a special article written by a special editor, I'm bypassing it and posting my questions only here on this talk page.  It's a bit presumptuous of me, I know; I'm very much an amateur with the audacity of reviewing and copyediting an article written by a professional writer, academic, and expert in the subject, but this being the democratic and open project it is, I'll have a go at it.
Lead: No infobox?  I don't care much for them myself, but I'd like to hear the case for not having one here.
:I don't particularly care for them either, but I'm sure someone will come along and ask for one, so I've just added one. Wadewitz (talk) 20:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, good call.  Although I just heard a lecture about marketing, and how content should be directed towards all kinds of readers: those who tend to scan everything, those who scan depending on what it is, and those who like to read every printed thing that comes their way.  Perhaps infoboxes are for the scanners.  Anyway, I'm rethinking them. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

text: Thanks so much! I'm just trying to get a lot of reviews and lots of good of copyediting eyes, so I really appreciate your help. I'm hardly an expert myself, so the more help the better! These are great suggestions. I'll start working on them now. Wadewitz (talk) 22:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:   I was going to boldly bump it up to A-class but it looks like it will go straight to GA :) -- phoebe / (talk to me) 19:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Will be working on revising the last two sections! I'll probably do formal GA just because I like lots of reviews! Wadewitz (talk) 20:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, if that's what you want.  You can tell your reviewer that I said I think that once you revise the sections, it's ready to be a GA.  I agree with Phoebe, though, so I'll go ahead and be bold.  Good luck! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figureskatingfan review 

message: Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Fanny Bullock Workman, in women's history month, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  TFAR 

message: There is at least one unused image in the recently created Commons:Category:Fanny Bullock Workman, and many more public domain (1911) images in The Call of the Snowy Hispar, if anyone would like to use them. Cheers on the article. --Animalparty-- (talk) 07:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons category and more images 

message: The article says (in the section on her final years) that Ms Workman was the first woman to give lectures at the Sorbonne in Paris, and this would have been sometime around 1914. By that time, Marie Curie had been a faculty professor of physics at the same university for several years - this is well attested in numerous biographies and probably also in a few books on the Sorbonne. 83.254.154.164 (talk) 14:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: User talk:83.254.154.164, would you (or anyone else, if they could) provide those sources?  I've done a cursory look, including Curie's WP article, and wasn't able to corroborate your claim.  Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This just in at WP:ERRORS (but it's 2 minutes until the article is off the Main Page, so I'm repeating it here): "Fanny Bullock Workman was the first American woman to lecture at the Sorbonne, as is clearly stated in the reference, not the first woman regardless of nationality. Heck, they even had a female professor at the Sorbonne (University of Paris) by then, Nobel Prize winner Marie Curie. Thomas.W  talk 22:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I see "American" has been added in the article lead and hasn't been reverted. - Dank (push to talk) 00:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First woman to give lectures at the Sorbonne? 

message: Congratulations to all the contributors to this featured article. You deserve a lot of applause, recognition and appreciation. What a wonderful article.
:  Bfpage |leave a message  16:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congratulations!

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Maull & Fox - Fanny Bullock Workman.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 8, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-01-08. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:16, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Maull & Fox - Fanny Bullock Workman.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: What is meant by "professional mountaineer"? "Professional" normally means you get paid for it, which seems unlikely in the case of a mountaineer. --Bermicourt (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional mountaineer? 

message: Peter Taugwalder is reported in his own article as having given up guiding shortly after his ascent with Whymper, and he died in the 1880s anyway, so it seems likely that the Peter Taugwalder who guided FBW on her ascent was Peter Taugwalder the Younger, not his father. Can anyone confirm this? If so, the article should make it clear which Taugwalder it's referring to--at the moment the link (to the father's article) is misleading. 206.208.104.20 (talk) 14:30, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Taugwalder 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fanny Bullock Workman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131015134320/http://www.wellesley.edu/cws/fellowships/wellesley to http://www.wellesley.edu/cws/fellowships/wellesley
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The quotation in Chapter India, 2nd paragraph, citing as a source a newspaper clipping, has IMHO been imprecisely used, because Workman's words refer to Java and not to India. Besides there is no explanation what sort of text this "My Asiatic Wanderings" is and where it comes from. DaLoetz (talk) 10:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  falsely understood quote 

message: The section Hispar and Siachen glaciers contains a serious factual mistake in this sentence: ″The Workmans' exploration of the Rose Glacier and the 45-mile-long (72 km) Siachen Glacier in Baltistan around Masherbrum in 1911...″ Rose is another name for Siachen Glacier. Fanny Bullock explains it at length in her text.DaLoetz (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  factual mistake 

message: • An imprecise quotation in the section Early life – in the original text by Jenny Ernie-Steighner the passage "no other well-known international mountaineers of the time, male or female, spoke as openly and fervently about women's rights" refers BOTH to Fanny Bullock Workman AND Annie Smith Peck. The way the citation is offered now is misleading.
• To call FBW a geographer is IMHO a misnomer as she had no formal education in this field and her contribution in this field was by no means scientific. Her cartographical endeavours have been commented on.
• A lot in this article is based the source that is introduced with: ″Thomas Pauly writes in his short biography of Workman that...″. Thomas Pauly, with all due respect for his professorship, did not write a biography of FBW, but a very short article for a university magazine, that deals mainly with some financial aspects of her career and self-promotion, and is itself based more in-depth studies. DaLoetz (talk) 19:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  other issues