Talk:Razorlight

message: According to their official website "HTTP://WWW.RAZORLIGHT.CO.UK" they have named producers Lillywhite and Dave McCracken as helping them produce their new album. Johnny said, and I quote, "the album will have a city energy". I don't know if this is the right section of the site to post news like this (as I literally joined Wiki today) but I figured it was useful info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vialobe (talk • contribs) 12:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info on their newest album 

message: Who the f*** is Rusty Bradshaw, and how is he related to the band? Why would him raping a girl make a useful addition to an encyclopedia article about the band?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.199.174.149 (talk) 13:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rusty Bradshaw 

message: I think this article has been vandalised. can someone review the edit history and restore it? i dont know how to --Sparkelman11 (talk) 11:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalised 

message: Razorlight are clearly on a major label, the Indie genre classification is very highly questionable. In the interests of NPOV, and presenting all views (instead of trying a rational one, like say: the BBC has to), I propose a compromise: clarifying that they are in the style of Indie Rock (as an artist connection at least), while clearing up any confusion that might lead readers to believe they are on an independent label by specifying which labels are major labels that they are signed to.
I will go ahead with this change now. Any thoughts?
-VirianFlux
:I personaly think that defining a music genre by whether a band are or are not signed to a major label is absurd, same with defining it by being "alternative", without saying what exactly they are alternative to, and that they are in fact part of the mainstream. Music should not be about who owns who, it should be about what or how you are playing. Pixies played folk and surf influenced punk rock... i think that's a pretty precise definition of what the did/do... if you say they were/are an "indie" band my answer would be "yes, but i asked about their music not their contractual situation with a major label", same with Razorlight. Only British and Americans can came up with this stupid market oriented genre definitions. Maybe this is a discussion that would be more appropriate for another articule... but i just want to say that the only genre definitions that i consider correct for this band are Post-punk revival and/or Garage rock/Garage rock revival. To hell with poverty! September 20, 20:29
::You haven't made it clear what your position is on clarifying the indie genre confusion by adding a major label clarification. Wikipedia entries are best left to decribing factual infomation such as if a label is major or not, or the date something happend. This is easy to fact check and cite sources. Either way, someone has changed  the article without discussing it in here, the article will have to be locked if this continues.
:::Found out the change was probably part of an innocent infobox update!
well saves the day are major label but they are still "Indie rock"
- THRICE 34
: how can they possibly be 'indie' when they've never been signed to anything but a major label? It either means music of any style released on independent labels or it means absolutely nothing. Or are we saying 'indie rock' is rock music for anyone who won't have anything to do with 'headbangers'? Is it 'rock' that the NME tells you is OK to like? Musical snobbery.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.13.221 (talk) 00:42, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indie Genre? 

message: Why is this page filled with content about Keane? Does anybody know how to change this back to Razorlight content? I don't know how to do it. Somebody was messing with this page, methinks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.101.6.212 (talk) 16:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the hell? 

message: page is a mess needs redone, i removed a section about razorlight being a teeny bopper band, compared to s-club and take that, with fans aged 8-16..... ridiculous —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.156.38.248 (talk) 16:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was vandalism, and I thank you for removing it. However whilst improvements are needed, I don't think this article is terrible. If there are any improvements you want to make, feel free to be bold and make them yourself. --Mark (Talk) 19:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible page 

message: I've been unable to revert. For some reason someone messed with the artist box. Help? Doc Strange 19:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've sorted it. Adamsprrw changed 'Infobox musical artist' to 'Infobox musical Artist' for some reason. Mark (Talk) 20:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Artist Box

message: I know they have two Swedish members in the band, but surely they are still and English band, and count themselves as such?
There are many bands with members from outside the country they are formed in, and are not counted (see U2 etc).
I would think they are still very much a English band, and should be referenced as such. Eastlygod 09:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think half the band being Swedish is enough to deserve that reference - especially as it seems like Carl joined the band purely because he knew Bjorn, having never played bass before.--MartinUK (talk) 10:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglo-Swedish? 

message: I am removing this this
"The crowd was not pleased. The cheek."
That has no place here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.136.107.139 (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia Rubbish 

message: someone had the new razorlight tour starting on the wrong date it actualy started on the 10th not the 11th at exeter university trust me i was there  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.173.209.82 (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Razorlight arms tour start was wrong 

message: They are primarily known in their home countries, having topped the charts with the 2006 single America and its parent self-titled album, their second.
They are primary known in England and Sweden having topped the charts in America?! Wlwwybrn (talk) 12:20, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?