lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Excitebike

message: Shouldn't Excitebike 64 have it's own seperate page? Andrzejbanas 04:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Excitebike 64

message: There are at least 3 version of the opening music, each only slightly different.  PrometheusX303 08:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening music 

message: Is it possible to save tracks created in the Virtual Console version of this game? Jeff Silvers 23:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind; I downloaded the game today, and you can, in fact, save a track to the system.  It appears somebody has already edited the article to this effect, anyway. Jeff Silvers 01:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saving tracks from the VC version? 

message: In the section of the article that talks about Mario Excitebike, it says
"The concept of the game was unchanged except for a "SUPER" mode where the player has unlimited turbo".  While, of course, SUPER mode was not present in the original game, it was first introduced in Vs. Excitebike, and was then carried over to Mario Excitebike.  It even had the same way of activation(clip 5 CPU players).  Is this worth adding into the article?
Rock200X (talk) 03:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super mode in Vs. Excitebike 

message: Why is there no mention of Excite Boxing in the article?  The only other NES Excite game bar Vs.--Guru Larry (talk) 04:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Likely since it does not appear to be directly related to this game. It seems to me to be a boxing game that just happens to use the word Excite with no connection to this game.--76.69.169.220 (talk) 23:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excite Boxing 

message: Can someone explain the hatnote? What is the connection between Mario Excite Bike and Kirby's Adventure? --Mika1h (talk) 21:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it since it seems pointless. The section that Mario Excite Bike redirects to does not mention Kirby or any of his games, nor does the Kirby's Adventure article mention Mario Excite Bike or even Mario. If someone wishes to add it again they should explain the reason that someone typing Mario Excite Bike would be looking for Kirby's Adventure.--70.49.74.113 (talk) 04:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote 
Template talk:American Samoa

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is aqua?  Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure why aqua was added to the template back in 2006, but it's been that way ever since. Feel free to change it. It's an unnecessary decoration. Firsfron of Ronchester 02:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, done.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:27, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aqua
Template talk:United States Virgin Islands

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is aqua?  Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:49, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, since there are no objections, I am going to change the color to the default.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aqua
Template talk:South Carolina

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks!—Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: According to Wikipedia, there are two different Broad Rivers in South Carolina. For now I changed the link to the disambig page, which lists both rivers, but I'm fairly certain it shouldn't be left that way permanently. Can anyone come up with a way to fit both into the template without confusion? Amphy 04:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Broad River]]

message: The template needs to be reorganized. Unlike most states, South Carolina Law does not recognize the difference between a "village" or "town" or "city". SC Law only provides for an area to be incorporated as a municipality, that municipality then chooses how it identifies itself, therefore the current template gives viewers a misconception. Also, as previously suggested, there are probably many municipalities (of all sizes) and many CDPs (with large populations) left off of the template. The template needs to be redone to include all municipalities and only the largest CDPs.
I would suggest the template being designed out as following:
* Regions
* Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)
* Major Cities (Populations of 50,000+)
* Medium Cities (Populations of 10,000-49,999)
* Small Cities (Populations of less than 10,000, must be incorporated under law)
* CDPs (if determined necessary)
* Counties
* Topics
Many of the municipalities are currently in a misleading category. For example, Isle of Palms, South Carolina has a population of 4,133 and is in the smaller cities category, yet Mount Pleasant has a population of 67,843 and is in the towns category. Even though Mount Pleasant identifies itself as a town it appears to be a small community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tstarl0425 (talk • contribs) 02:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities, Towns, and CDPs
Template talk:Rhode Island

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Standardization of state templates

message: The "region" links in this template were never very useful. Someone had added them in on the notion that there was scads of info to write about the state's regions, as defined by some tourism office. In practice, this was never done; that sort of information invariably has found its way to city/town articles, or to county articles. Two of the regions -- "South County" and "Providence" -- were actually coterminous with a county and city, respectively. So I deleted all but two of the regions -- Blackstone Valley, an interstate region and National Heritage Corridor, and Block Island. Those I moved to be on the same line as the counties. Also: the Narragansett Indian Tribe link was unnecessarily taking up an entire line on its own, so I moved that to "topics." Net loss to the template -- two extra lines and a handful of useless links. ``` W i k i W i s t a h W a s s a p ``` 04:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Slimming the template (edits of 16 July)

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is yellow?  I understand the idea of trying to match the flag, but it seems a bit bright. Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Color
Template talk:South Dakota

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates
Talk:Mario Golf (handheld game)

message: Why must every Mario portable sports game have to have all these characters that don't go with the Mario universe at all? --Plainnym 14:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Jersey/templates

message: We need to come up with a consistent scheme for county templates. For example, on a county's article, does the New Jersey template or the County's Template go first? Bergen is before NJ on Bergen County, New Jersey, but New Jersey is before Somerset on Somerset County, New Jersey.
I think I like county first, state later, but I'm not sure... ideas? //MrD9 07:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: County templates

message: I have just gone through and removed fair use images from a number of New Jersey county templates (,,, etc.). Please note that the use of fair use tagged images outside of the main article namespace is proscribed by Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9. This prevents the use of such images on templates such as these. Please do not re-insert the various seals/logos of the counties back into the templates. If you have any questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. Please contact me at my talk page. Thanks, --Durin 20:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't make a lot of sense to me, these are templates that are to be used in the main namespace.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 03:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

text: *Because templates can and are used outside of the main article namespace. Wikipedia draws a clear and easy to understand line to aid in management of fair use abuses; "No fair use outside of main article namespace". If the seal is important to the article, then it should already been on the article. It does not need to be on a template, where it is there purely for decorative purpose anyway (which is not a valid fair use claim). --Durin 20:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use on templates
Talk:The Anatomy of the Body of God

message: User:Sandstein proded this article as "non-notable, Amazon rank 1,657,640 (or 2,319,877  for paperback)." As it is a published book and even has an Amazon ranking, it is clearly a notable topic. I believe the book warrants an article, and if you disagree please nominate it for AfD. AmiDaniel (Talk) 07:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion
Talk:Phagwara

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.62.99.224 (talk) 08:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

message: we don't want to be angry with any body. o.k.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.224.33 (talk) 14:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  there is no subject headline. 

message: I removed the cleanup tag I saw no obvious problems apart from a few minor copy-editing errors (which are covered under SoFixIt) and a bit of an excessive use of lists (but not much more than other city articles I've seen).  There was a comment saying to see Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cities, but I didn't see anything related to this article. The talk page was also bare of information.
If you want to put a cleanup tag here, please refer to the specific issue using cleanup|reason=my reason goes here or even better cleanup|reason=see Talk:Phagwara#My_reason_goes_here and give a detailed account under the new subject "My reason goes here" on the talk page.
BrotherE (talk) 20:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove cleanup tag
Talk:Eric Aubriot

message: The issue of copying the text from the Gourmand Management website is moot as I also wrote the text for the website. My name is James Toland and I am Eric's business partner and have authority to write about Eric in my own words for the sake of posterity. Please restore the article. —This unsigned comment was added by Jauma23 (talk • contribs) .
:According to a whois of the domain, you are indeed the owner (I am assuming you are Mr. Toland judging from your previous edits) of the site, so I am going to let it stay up, but be advised that by submitting it here, it will be subject to the GFDL, meaning the copyright of the text on your site will be essentially worthless. Also, consider looking through the Manual of style in order to make the article look as neat as possible. -Obli (Talk)? 12:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lists of feature films with LGBT characters

message: Please read WP:CITEVAR (aka WP:WHENINROME) for citing sources in this article. Observe and follow the citation style used in the list (which includes no BAREURLS and parenthetical referencing). Your cooperation and diligence will be appreciated. Pyxis Solitary  (yak). L not Q. 08:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing sources

message: The following are the "Non-merged films" that appeared in the list. These films lack reliable sources. After sources are found for a film, the film row can be transferred to the list with citations included.
Year	Title               	Character(s)	Identity	Actor        	Notes	Country      	
1996	Camping Cosmos      	Harry / Arno	Gay     	Arno Hintjens	     	Belgium      	
1996	Don't Be a Menace...	Loc Dog     	Bisexual	Marlon Wayans	     	United States	
Year	Title                         	Character(s)              	Identity	Actor                   	Notes                                                                                                                                                                                               	Country      	
2001	Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back	Brodie Bruce/Banky Edwards	Gay     	Jason Lee               	                                                                                                                                                                                                    	United States	
2004	White Chicks                  	Aubrey Allure             	Gay     	Kevin Blatch            	Aubrey is the coordinator of the fashion show runway.                                                                                                                                               	United States	
2009	The Joneses                   	Mick Jones                	Gay     	Benjamin Hollingsworth  	                                                                                                                                                                                                    	United States	
2009	Mundane History               	Ake                       	Gay     	Phakpoom Surapongsanuruk	The film tells the story of a young Thai man, Ake, who is bed-ridden and paralyzed from the waist down. He gradually becomes sexually attracted by his male nurse, Pun, during washing and changing.	Thailand     	
Year	Title     	Character(s) 	Identity	Actor              	Notes	Country              	
2013	Horns     	Eric Hannity 	Gay     	Michael Adamthwaite	     	Canada, United States	
2017	F the Prom	TJ           	Gay     	Luke Bilyk         	     	United States        	
2022	Scream    	Amber Freeman	Bisexual	Mikey Madison      	     	United States        	
Pyxis Solitary  (yak). L not Q. 10:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Films to be added to list
Talk:Portage Trail Conference

message: Being a graduate of Windham High School, I really hate to ask this question, but what is the importance of the subject of this article? We also should consider adding source citations to this article. I'm about to add this to Wikipedia:WikiProject Ohio as well to improve this article. -- SwissCelt 11:34, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance? 

message: I removed the external link to the discussion forum which is dedicated to a single school in the PTL, since it is not a source of factual information for the article. It might be appropriate for an article dedicated to that individual school or community. --Dan East 06:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also removed the external link to the Ravenna High School football team. External links on this page need to be related to the conference as a whole, not a specific team. --JonRidinger (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed external link 

message: I am going to start updating as many of the sports as I can, but would really appreciate it if some others could help. For much of the page, excluding football, the championships haven't been updated since about 2013.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corbyze (talk • contribs) 04:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updated
Talk:Hardpoint

message: Can we please create redirects from weapon station and weapon store(s) to this page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.251.243.16 (talk) 01:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects

message: The caption to one of the images claims there are 6 JDAMs on the shown ejector rack.  I only see 4.  Are there more that aren't visible?  Seems like this should be clearer for an example image.  DudeFromWork (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Stay away from things you don't know anything about or do proper research. The B-52's rack is an ICSMS with nine stores, not six, not three. In the image it mounted only six because the bombs are large Mk84 JDAMs, hence, the center three were left empty. Here's an image showing the complete pylon. I'm reverting the wrong edit. Mightyname (talk) 11:00, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Six JDAMs 

message: "The pylon is designed to position the rack and its stores to keep them clear of control surfaces and position them close to the aircraft's center of gravity."
Garbage, or they wouldn't be on the wings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.64.47.180 (talk) 07:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  C of G 

message: For an example of the confusion in this article, under which heading would the LAU-142/A be covered? Hcobb (talk) 15:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms in this article are unclear 

message: The article is currently illustrated with a diagram of the engine pylon whose failure caused the crash of American Airlines Flight 191. That's better than nothing. A point on the picture is labeled "failed wing clevis". No explanation is given. It would be great to have an illustration of working hardpoints. TypoBoy (talk) 02:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  DC-10 crash illustration
Talk:List of apologetic works

message: Is there any rationale for creating this list, it looks pointless to me. ping 08:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts exactly. Honestly, would anyone like to defend this list? The only article of importance that links to it is Christian apologetics; there's no explanation for what is included on this list, or why it is limited to 20th century works. -- llywrch 21:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is an excellent list for people who want more detail.  ken 00:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I the idea of a "list of apologetic works" is fine, but the current contents are problematic. Besides Llywrch's point about the lack of pre-20th century works, I would note following from Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)#Selection criteria: "Ideally each entry on the list should have a Wikipedia article but this is not required if it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future." The other lists in :Category:Lists of controversial books appear to follow this guideline. It seems unlikely to me that most of the works currently in this list will ever have their own articles. EALacey 21:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a start on linking authors and works with articles, and it's clear that the authors are far more likely to have articles than their works are. Maybe changing this article into a "List of religious apologists" would be more in keeping with the guidelines? EALacey 13:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree -- bibliographies are acceptable but most of the books should have their own articles (see Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)#Selection criteria and compare Oz books and List of books by P. G. Wodehouse, for example) or be deserving of one under WP:BK (most here are not). I'd also note that Gordon Clark, Cornelius Van Til, and John Frame are noticeably absent from this list. I'm going to nominate this for deletion. --Flex (talk|contribs) 01:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Apple II system clocks

message: This article is a sub-page of the Apple II peripheral cards project.  Please see Talk:Apple II peripheral cards for an outline before editing this page.  Thanks! --PZ 08:11, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "[The Time Master H.O.] also maintained an internal calendar, separate of the 7 year cycle which ProDOS mapped."
I suspect that this should be 7 bit year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Patrie (talk • contribs) 21:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ProDOS 7 year cycle?
Talk:Orishas (band)

message: Los or Las ?
Neither, I think. -- Beardo 00:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is tagged with a neutrality dispute as of July 2009, but nothing is mentioned here on the talk page.  Is there an actual dispute or no?  I'm doing a copy-edit; I'll leave the tag for now, but someone may want to remove it if the user who tagged it (or someone else) doesn't have a specific NPOV violation in mind. JohannVII (talk) 16:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After re-reading the Wikipedia policy guidelines for the  tag, I've decided to remove the tag from the page, as no discussion nor mention of the reason for adding it has been given over the course of the past three months, and I do not know why it was added in the first place. If someone wishes to re-tag the article, please post your reason(s) for doing so here. JohannVII (talk) 17:58, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality dispute?