Talk:Ami Onuki

message: The medical bits are obvoisly dubious, and the divorce bit is a bit shady as well.I know these statements don't exist in the ja: article...Ranma9617 21:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the article. Those edits are clearly vandalism. --Snkcube 06:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we may be dealing with a potential sock puppet. I just tagged a another piece of dubious medical info, though the anon that allegedly inserted it had a different IP addy this time...Ranma9617 02:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Well,not only has the "sources needed" tag been largely ignored, but some of the info may borderline with possible dubious accuracy. Thus I retagged this article as needing factual verification. Then again, even it may not be adequate... Ranma9617 08:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some sources to the stuff that really needed it and I just removed that trivia section.  Yumi's entry had hers removed as well (not by me), as per the WP:TRIVIA style article, so now they're both consistent.  There was a bunch of unverifiable and probably wrong stuff in the trivia section here anyway, and it seems like that section was just a magnet for abuse - every time it got cleaned up, new crap would creep in. It's harder to introduce false information if you need to actually write a paragraph around it.  Badasscat 21:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factually inaccurate statements or vandalism? 

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 04:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: Does Ms. Kawaye sound similar to Ms. Onuki?--71.35.69.46 04:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it; the voice Ms. Kawaye gives the animated Ami sounds nothing like the real one. --DarkAdonis255 14:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ami and Janice

message: :Image:Honey single.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Honey single.JPG

message: :Image:CartoonAmi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:CartoonAmi.jpg

message: Where did you get "the cool part of Puffy"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.74.162.173 (talk) 00:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cool