lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wishbringer

message: Personally, I don't like the table that has been added. It makes little sense to those who haven't played the game, and looks too much like hints for those who are playing the game. In short, I don't think it adds much to the article to list exactly where each object is found and where its associated wish comes in handy. However, I don't want to delete it without asking for a discussion first. - DynSkeet *  Talk 19:38, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't played the game, but it doesn't bother me (much). — Frecklefoot | Talk 19:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't like it. I don't think we should have detailed hints on games. Why not a complete walkthough? IMHO, it's not encylopedic. Ntsimp 20:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It struck me as a bit odd, appearing just below the sentence "These objects and their relations to the wishes are described in the feelies as a form of copy protection." Not that Wishbringer is a hot subject of piracy these days, but it seems conspicuously... conspicuous. - DynSkeet *  Talk 20:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of wishes
Talk:Haruka Shitow

message: I have to say that I do not like this article.  To me, it seems highly interpretive and speculative (mainly on what Haruka's role within the show is).  It also does not really delve into her actual character very much at all.  The first and last paragraph have little to do with her actual character and more to do with RahXephon as an overall show.  I believe that this article should be flagged for deletion and all pertinent information relating to the character of Haruka Shitow be merged with her section in Characters in RahXephon  Js2756 14:47, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
: I have contacted Cellot2001 on the talk page of that user: User Talk:Cellot2001 I suggest giving at least a week to respond. Untill then, I'll remove the link from the Characters in RahXephon page. --GunnarRene 15:28, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Henry Galway

message: I could find virtually no information on this person outside Wikipedia. He may have been Governor of Saint Helena before his posting to South Australia. http://www.sainthelena.gov.sh/government/govoffice.htm  lists Lieutenant Colonel Henry Galway from 1903, and http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Saint_Helena.htm lists Henry Lionel Gallwey with the same years of birth and death as governor of Saint Helena. The next most useful info was that he appears to have liked Yalumba Galway Pipe port, and he had a joy flight with Harry Butler, and early aviator. --ScottDavis 14:57, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Other info
Talk:Church and state in medieval Europe

message: Hi, I came across the article Dominium mundi at the list of requests for cleanup after translation.  I know absolutely nothing about this topic, but as I worked on the lead section, I came across a few other articles (this one, Investiture Controversy, Frederick I, Holy Roman Emperor, and others) that seemed to overlap with it in various ways.  I think it would be really helpful if someone with knowledge of the history of this period would take a look at the article and see if perhaps parts of it (or all of it) could be merged. - AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 06:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dominium mundi]] 

message: However, in the Eastern Roman Empire, also known as Byzantine, Church and state were separate and collaborated in a "symphony", with some exceptions (see Iconoclasm). This was unlike in the Islamic world, where the two were one and the same. The concept of Church and state at odds would have been very foreign in Islamic society.
This seems like POV to me. Does anyone disagree? FilipeS (talk) 16:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if it is POV but it is certainly incorrect, as church and state were quite often at odds in the Islamic world. Adam Bishop (talk) 17:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: There should be a general article on the Relationship between Church and State of which Separation is one aspect and Medieval Period another. Hood23 (talk) 16:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church and state 

message: This article is massively biased towards the church of Rome.  It presumes, in its text, that:
(i) 'Catholic Church' means the church of Rome. In actual fact, the use of that term is disputed.
(ii) 'Church' means the church of Rome.  
(iii) the church of Rome is somehow the continuing part of the original church after the East-West schism. This is revisionist history promulgated by those favourable to another claim of the church of Rome, ergo to be the 'one true church'.--jrl 12:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it happens to be written from the western perspective at the moment, since no one has added anything about the relationship between church and state in the east. Nothing sinister, and no intentional bias. Adam Bishop (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias
Talk:Sandy Lake Band of Mississippi Chippewa

message: The Sandy Lake Tragedy section is well written and could stand on its own as an article with some additions.  The histories of the various Lake Superior and Mississippi bands will link there.  Any thoughts?
(Leo1410 16:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Sandy Lake Tragedy section here should be kept, but there really isn't much details here because its focus is on the Sandy Lake Band and their impact due to the Tragedy.  A fully developed Sandy Lake Tragedy article of its own right is a good thing, since there is a lot more to the tragedy than what is briefly mentioned here. CJLippert 05:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandy Lake Tragedy
Help talk:Talk pages/Anonymous talk pages proposal

message: * I would like a larger X.  At least 30.  They often come back every few weeks and do the same things.  It's inconvenient to have to force people to go through the anon's history to see if they censored their own criticism.  Hell, why are people allowed to censor their own criticism at all?? - Omegatron 18:04, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
* I also would like a much larger X.  Some anon IPs are associated with repeated vandalism.  When a vandal starts attacking multiple pages, often the only way to find and fix them all is to use the "user contributions" link and evaluate each edit made by the anon user(s).  When I get done, I want to record that "I've investigated all edits from xxx date to yyy date and reverted the inappropriate ones" so that when the vandal returns, the next poor editor doing cleanup can start where I stopped and won't have to investigate each of the edits already checked.  That recordkeeping about vandalism should be kept for a very long time.  (If I had my druthers, I'd never remove those comments.)  Rossami (talk) 16:54, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Defining X (days)
Talk:Alvin Goldman

message: Biographical information is needed, and sections on his work in philosophy of mind and cognitive science should be added.  If anyone is familiar with his most recent work, that should also be included.  Someone more knowledgeable than me should expound on the problem with the original causal theory.  Maybe an example of causal theory should be included (although this should maybe be in a separate article on causal theory?) 
--AAMiller 15:36, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chemical Diversion and Trafficking Act

message: :DEA chemical control was initiated in the United States with the passage of the Chemical Diversion and Trafficking Act of 1988 (CDTA) that became effective on August 1, 1989. The initial legislation was drafted in 1985. The CDTA regulated 1 2 precursor chemicals, eight essential chemicals, tableting machines, and encapsulating machines by imposing record keeping and import/export reporting requirements on transactions involving these materials. United States companies were the main source of tons of chemicals used in the production of cocaine in the Andean countries of South America. The principal chemicals used in the production of cocaine at that time included acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, ethyl ether, potassium permanganate, hydrochloric acid, and sulfuric acid. Soon after the CDTA became effective, the quantity of many of these chemicals exported from the United States declined significantly.
:Cocaine traffickers reacted to the reduction in the availability of U.S. chemicals for illicit production by developing new sources of supply in other parts of the world. The U.S. Government, with the leadership and assistance of the DEA, responded by eliciting the support of the international community for worldwide chemical control. The international community responded by incorporating Article 12 into the U.N. Convention Against Illicit Drug Traffic of 1988.
How is it possible than an act that went into effect in 1989 caused a chain of events that led to incorporation of Article 12 in the 1988 treaty? Are they saying that there was there an amendment to the treaty? CSA 15:44, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: DEA claim
Talk:Non-ionising radiation

message: The 'z' spelling of ionization is also acceptable in British English. Since the article on ionizing radiation has the 'z' spelling, would it make sense to alter this one for consistency?
- Sophisticated Penguin
As it stands the following statement is nearly a perfect example of Wikipedia's definition of Weasel wording. I propose the statement be either removed or elaborated upon and made to appear with a properly cited source.
'However, some studies have shown that long-term exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields (such as those produced by some power lines) can pose a health risk, though the radiation itself is non-ionising.'
:I am going to remove that weasely sentence. Robotbeat 18:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jerome Kersey

message: Needs biographical information, particularly on career. Tone is not sufficiently neutral. — RJH 15:52, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this is a dead link but i've included it here in case someone can find a live version. hbdragon88 (talk) 05:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Internet Archive has it here. SJ Morg (talk) 08:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto wholesaler 
Talk:The Game (treasure hunt)

message: "According to IMDB [1], this was the inspiration for the movie The Game."
Can anyone provide any supporting evidence that this IMDB bit of trivia is correct? Someone who has never played The Game might say that, for instance, "The Magus" by John Fowles could be the inspiration for the movie.  
--
Removed Overnightmare from Game list - not really a 24-hour Game (we should be strict as far as what we include here IMHO - I would include only the 24-hour events)
--
"This article lacks information on the subject matter's importance."  
Some thoughts submitted for your approval:
"The Game" is the product of a culture of intellectual achievement which permeates Silicon Valley.  It is sort of an extreme-sports version of a treasure hunt.  Combined with its underground nature (and maybe the luminaries who have participated in it), this gives it a mystique and a reputation that extends far beyond the small group of people who have played in it.  
Or fish around in related newspaper/magazine articles (e.g., the Rolling Stone article) for more evidence of significance.
Additional notes: The Game is still being played and constructed across the country, and is often wondered about by people who have friends involved in it. ;-) A version of The Game is done yearly by Microsoft for its intern program, in an attempt to increase awareness of The Game, to preserve the intellectual aspect of MS's Silicon Valley mentality, and, of course, for fun. (The MS game will have a website soon.)
--
The Microsoft Intern Game now has a web site and it's been added to the list of links. Nfang 05:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IMDB

message: Why are various games in cities that are not Seattle (Las Vegas, New York, etc.) listed under the header of Seattle Games? Darquis 00:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seattle Games 

message: We might want to add something about how the team dynamic of the Game is unfair to those of us who are smart enough that they don't need team members. Pollymerace 23:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanford Games
File talk:Teller-Ulam device 3D.svg

message: The right side of blue core cut away should be flat blue or linear gradient, not radial gradient. Otherwise it implies that it is not flat and looks confusing. Kaldari 16:14, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a note that I completely agree, but my computer with Illustrator has been down for about a month (not yet unpacked) so I haven't had a chance to fix it yet. First chance I'll get, I'll fix it in the original source and re-export it. --Fastfission 02:32, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Note: It has since  been fixed. --Fastfission 16:08, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The original Featured status was for the original PNG version of this image. The only change made when converting it to SVG is that 1. the gradient of the fission tamper has been changed to a linear gradient rater than radial (see above), 2. The inside of the overall casing was originally labeled "Polystyrene-filled radiation channel". I decided that this was not helpful at best and a disputed aspect at worst. Removing the caption did not change the image substantially. Aside from those minor modifications, there are no changes. --Fastfission 16:08, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PNG to SVG
Talk:Nicole Farhi

message: What year was she born in?? Georgia guy 16:17, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If I could find out, I'd have put it in the article... I can't find it anywhere. -- Karada 16:26, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: Having said which, aha! 1947, according to Vogue. -- Karada 16:27, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But it looks like Vogue might be wrong: more sources, including the NPG, say 1946. -- Karada 16:38, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On her article page, it's given as French of Algerian descent; on her husband David Hare's page, it's Algerian.  Which is it? 86.133.214.216 (talk) 19:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: Interesting information in French Connection's Regulatory News Service announcement of the disposal of the Nicole Farhi label to a private equity house: date of foundaton stated as 1982, not 1983, and Marks credited as co-creator. CharlesSpencer (talk) 09:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sale of Nicole Farhi label by French Connection

message: Where did she study fashion/art, which institution in Paris?Melissa Highton (talk) 09:40, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education
Talk:Church of the Holy Apostles

message: The article says Anthemius and Isidorus the Older were the architects of the church. How come when Anthemius died around 534 and the church was built in 550? Could it be that the younger Isidorus built it? Anyway the info is not too certain. --Bollweevil 21:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Architects 

message: There exists no confirmed sources other than ones whose so called words, have mostly found their way to us today in mentions of others!
Please offer me any real evidence that anyone mentioned in this article or series of articles, has a verified source?  I mostly see sources who use the same unverfied sources as sources!
Would not the insertation of these words "It is thought" or "It is believed", or Some people have suggested or proposed thus!"
There has been "NO" archaeological work concerning the present site of what is now "presumed" to have been this edifice!
If I am wrong, then please present us with some "evidence" that can stand some scruntity!
Regards, 96.19.147.40 (talk) 22:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Every section of this site should begin with these words, "It is presumed or thought" 

message: By reading the text, it appears that something essential is missing in the article, i.e where are the tombs of all these people (beginning from Constantine I), someone can assume that they are still found there.Alexikoua (talk) 08:27, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not likely. By the time of their exhumation by the Ottomans, the bodies had long turned to dust and the tombs were no longer respected - way was made for Muslim building projects. What happened to the sarcophagi isn't recorded.50.111.46.18 (talk) 11:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Tombs of Byzantine Emperors
Talk:Safety engineering

message: We should expand the discussion of Fault Trees, add the concept of Event Trees, give the idea of Cutset and Minimal Cutset. Linuxlad
I think we should create a new article on Fault Trees, perhaps adding event trees into it. It's very widely used and doesn't deserve just one paragraph (no pictures) in a bigger article. --El Pollo Diablo | Talk 10:31, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fault trees 

message: Inherent safety is an important principle in and of itself, that's why I created a separate article and made some new redirects. However, the current chapter on Inherently fail-safe systems fits nicely into this article.
I suggest we just move the additional examples to the main page (there is already a more… link) and keep the rest of inherent safety material as a duplicate.
Arru 17:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inherent safety 

message: There seems to be a conflict between the safety certification section of this article, Life-critical system and hazard analysis regarding 109 hours of operation. This article states 109 seconds, which I beleive is incorrect. -Nordby73 17:46, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed the same thing. On Safety engineering, it says loss of "less than one life per 30 years of operation (109 seconds)." In fact, those numbers match up (109 seconds = 31.7 years).  109 hours is 114,755 years.  These numbers are big enough to be hard to imagine. However, many systems (power plants, buildings, battleships) operate for 30 years or more without loss of life, so that number seems a bit low.  On the other hand, no man-made systems have gotten anywhere near 114 kilo-years. Could it be in minutes (1903 years)? Ben 02:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: This is annoying me, so I browsed around and found this slide show from a course on safety. It describes the highest Safety Integrity Level as a Probability of dangerous failure per hour on the order of 10-9. I found similar material at  and at . So, I am now concluding that the correct answer is hours and that SIL-4 is very, very safe, indeed! I will change the articles. Ben 03:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict on number 

message: On the paragraph about late correction of safety designs, it looks as if the nuclear industry was singled out. It would be a good idea to be more specific (which projects, which context, etc) or add additional examples, in other industries, such as the agro-business and the mad-cow disease, for example. Could we strive for a more neutral wording? 
ThierryQ 15:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  singling out the nuclear industry?
Talk:Strophariaceae

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Pholiota malicola.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 11, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-04-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 17:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Pholiota malicola.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Pressure cooking

message: The whole article seems to take a rather disparaging tone toward classic pressure cookers and favors the newer European style countertop units over the stove top units. The "First Generation" "Second generation" classification seems inherently wrong. 
The use of derogatory terms like "jiggle-top" instead of "dead-weight pressure regulator" seems biased to me.
Many old pressure cookers had features like selectable pressure settings that are ascribed to newer generations.
Was the basic article layout and outline put into place by a representative of a manufacturer of countertop self-contained units?
I am a physical chemist and am very familiar with the science involved. I have been using pressure cookers since I was a kid helping mother put up the victory garden produce during WWII  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.174.129.54 (talk) 17:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pressure cooking 

message: Near the end of the section about third generation "electric pressure cookers" it says:
"Since 2018, with the release of the game-changing Ninja Foodi pressure cooker, which became famous for being the first pressure cooker to possess the ability to air fry"
Worlds like "game-changing" and "famous", really? Never heard about those Ninja guys who apparently improved upon a convection oven and are now heroes. Although air frying might be worth mentioning, I don't think there's any need for blatant advertising like this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeHermansen (talk • contribs) 09:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden ads?
Talk:Agaricales

message: Removed several families from the list:
Auriscalpiaceae
Favolaschiaceae
Hericiaceae
Meruliaceae
Stereaceae
These are families of corticioid, polypore, jelly fungi, etc and have never been treated as members of the Agaricales. I also removed these two:
Omphalotaceae  
Russulaceae
Recent molecular work places these in the Boletales and Russulales, respectively.
Peter Werner - June 20, 2005
:My mistake concerning the Omphalotaceae. I've replaced it in the taxobox, along with some other Tricholomataceae segregates. Peter G Werner 22:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I just created the article Agaric, not realizing that this article already existed.  Agaric should be merged to here, or removed and replaced with a redirect to here, by someone who knows more about it than I do.  -- Dominus 04:41, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly if Agaric is intended to cover the genus, then it should be merged into Agaricus, but merging the genus into the order seems a bit radical.  — Pekinensis 22:59, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

text: RJFJR has merged Agaric and Agaricus.  I have removed the merge tags from this article.  — Pekinensis 21:02, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. I'll help if I can cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agaric 

message: Which is right classification, this article or http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Agaricales? Neither have any sources. — linnea (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy 

message: I will be doing a total revision some time in the near future.Heliocybe 14:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. I'll help if I can cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of entire page 

message: These are the "true" puffballs, but they no longer stand alone as a family. The group is embedded within the family Agaricaceae. Heliocybe 11:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lycoperdaceae 
Talk:Tsushima Subprefecture

message: WRT Tsushima City reference, esp. consolidation of towns:
: Some material needs added and towns reconciled with this map |Encarts I just pulled out of the debate on Talk:Tsushima Islands — which may be Island or just Tsushima when the VOTE on that matter settles out. Just passing thru! FrankB || TalktoMe 16:47, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Towns+Villages Need Added