Talk:Gulfstream IV

message: The Gulfstream G450 is fairly short and has not gotten much activity.  What about merging that to this article?  -Fnlayson (talk) 02:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no objections, I'll start merging G350/G450 content here. -fnlayson (talk) 22:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but fix the "Main page: G450" reference near the bottom, which is now circular -- it just comes back here.  (Narcissistic?  Self-referential?) -- Craig Goodrich 98.220.72.56 (talk) 21:30, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it. MilborneOne (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gulfstream G350/G450 text 

message: Any issues with this merge?  I'm not seeing anything, but maybe I'm missing something.  I plan copy the text and reference.  And here's one article from Flight International that mentions G-IV-X. :) -Fnlayson (talk) 05:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no objections, I'll start merging G350/G450 content here. -fnlayson (talk) 22:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but fix the "Main page: G450" reference near the bottom, which is now circular -- it just comes back here.  (Narcissistic?  Self-referential?) -- Craig Goodrich 98.220.72.56 (talk) 21:30, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it. MilborneOne (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Why can't we add a list of civil operators (verifiable), let's say at least one from each continent? The.rud (talk) 12:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:AIROPS. - BilCat (talk) 12:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  "A mention may be made of particularly large fleet operators." I believe it is quite interesting to know where these jets are flying nowadays (e.g. operators and/or continents). So can I mention the biggest operators or the countries with the biggest number of jets of this type? "Particularly large" fleet for one business jet type means sometimes 4-5 a/c only... The.rud (talk) 13:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

text: 4-5 aircraft is fine. If the oeprators have a WP article, and their use of the aircraft is properly sourced in those articles, then we don't need a ciatation. Citations will be needed for those who don't have WP article. See what you can find, and then if there aren't that many of them, perhaps under 10, then list all the ones with more than 4-5 aircraft. - BilCat (talk) 13:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK. I wonder why other articles (e.g. British Aerospace 125) do mention 1-2 a/c operators.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The.rud (talk • contribs) 13:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  The simple reason is that we just haven't gotten around to cleaning out the cruft in those other articles. :) - The Bushranger One ping only 21:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CIVIL OPERATORS 

message: I think that "...a family of private jet aircraft..." sounds a bit amateurish. Gulfstream products or other similar products (say Bombardier jets) are called "business jets" and not "private jets". See here http://www.bombardier.com/en/aerospace/products/index, here http://www.gulfstream.com/products/ and here http://www.dassault.fr/en/filiale.php?docid=72. "Private jet" refers to something else. It does not refer to a type. The.rud (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and change it. - BilCat (talk) 12:30, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tweaked it and added a link to business jet (which actually give private jet as a viable alternate). MilborneOne (talk) 12:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  INTRO 

message: Although the C-20G is a Gulfstream IV the picture shows a C-20D, which is a GIII. You can tell because a GIV has 6 windows and much larger engines. The image shows a GIII with 5 windows and the smaller engines.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.107.205.103 (talk) 05:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume you mean the image of a USAF C-20B 60201, I have removed it, well spotted. MilborneOne (talk) 12:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of the C-20 

message: I was a bit surprised not to see a section for crashes.  The May 31, 2014 crash in Bedford Massachusetts sparked my interest.  I would like to add the section to the article but know their will be those who oppose for political reasons.  Feedback on how to proceed?--Wikipietime (talk) 13:55, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You may need to explain what "political reasons" has to do with it, the reason we dont have a section is that none of the Gulfstream crashes have been notable enough to include, I dont see anything in the Bedford crash that makes it notable either. MilborneOne (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crash History 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gulfstream IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110704105551/http://www.pearlharborvisitorcenter.com/archives/The_Grey_Ghost.html to http://www.pearlharborvisitorcenter.com/archives/The_Grey_Ghost.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150618173711/http://www.observer.ug/component/content/article?id=2655%3Amuseveni-shs-88bn-jet-arrives to http://www.observer.ug/component/content/article?id=2655%3Amuseveni-shs-88bn-jet-arrives
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified