Talk:Windows Vista I/O technologies

message: Cwolfsheep 19:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

message: They would have seen a lot better improvements, if the I/O could re-arrange the top 5 requests in to an efficient drive read pattern otherwise known as Shortest Seek Time First (SSTF), as to reduce head seek distance/time. Seb-Gibbs (talk) 15:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Driver optimisation

message: First impression is that Vista tended to load previously used programs on boot, utilizing the 8 GB I bought better. In Windows 7 it doesn't appear to be doing that and programs start up from disk instead of memory.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.172.94 (talk) 11:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Windows 7 SuperFetch working quite differently from Vista's

message: It appears that ReadyBoost was forgotten (or integrated with SuperFetch). There are probably several sources of information for it, but the one I just came across is here. --Kamasutra 09:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Windows ReadyBoost

message: A reference to http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc162480.aspx is needed in order to support several statements in the ReadyDrive section. -- Robbie Mosaic (Decheng) Fan, August 31, 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.24.176 (talk) 22:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Windows ReadyDrive

message: I believe that the initial comments that were on this forum shed light on some of the improvements and new technologies utilized by Windows Vista (superfetch).  I will paste the old discussion below:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
YO YO YO YO, I heard the mad notes about the vista superfetch. gun shots to microsoft. But straight up how is usb flash mem (yo) faster than harddrive spinners? I busted out the numbers yo, and quickly concludidized that flash mem (yo) shat the comparison. Big ups to my man cc, tony, and the russian monkeys. I would like an answer, still. WHAT WHAT! Straight goods !!!
* That's what I initially thought, and after some research, I found that while that is true for large reads, it evidently does not hold true for small random files due to a hard drive's seek time. -- Comthought 19:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If so then that's some incredibly slow RAM. The claim is that USB drives can read/write faster than a hard drive. It is supposed to supplement RAM if needed, but certainly not replace it. --Kamasutra 21:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  USB Faster than RAM 

message: I think ReadyBoost, SuperFetch, and Transactional NTFS should have their own pages, and the Vista IO page should just show brief summaries Phaldo 18:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Eventually, they (probably) will. Until someone writes significantly about them, this is enough. --soum talk 08:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Design

message: The text is copied verbatim from . -rayluT 18:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SuperFetch 

message: I'm hacking out this newly-added sentence because it clearly needs some work, however accurate or otherwise it might prove.
For what it's worth, I've skimmed that link and can find nothing helpful in the short time available…maybe someone with a better eye can find something.
HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 13:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work 

message: There is an offline files section in this article as well as the Management features new to Windows Vista article. Both contain different information. Would it be better to merge them or maybe synchronize them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.128.181.53 (talk) 20:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I synched the two, but how is Offline files a "Management feature"? My vote would be to remove the section from the mgmt article. --soum talk 08:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offline files 

message: After months of almost continuous disk access, I have turned off superfetch. I think I have my sanity back.  And my PC is more respsonsive.  This may explain why the oword "intended" is used in the article so much.  Rich Farmbrough, 08:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: SuperFetch

message: This section also needs info on changes made to folder redirection and roaming user profiles in Windows Vista. Anyone want to help? - xpclient Talk 14:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folder redirection and roaming user profiles 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:SuperFetch (TV series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 21:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress