lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lineage II

message: I'm not sure how legit this news is, but it says Lineage 2 will have a sequel called Lineage 3  which is different than Lineage Eternal. The wiki says Lineage Eternal will be the sequel.  Thoughts?
http://m.mmosite.com/mobile/index.php?action=article&nk=4&newsurl=http://news.mmosite.com/content/q/2012-03-08/lineage_3_is_being_developed_different_from_lineage_eternal.shtml  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.56.183.252 (talk) 13:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any reliable sources that confirm this information? DP76764 (Talk) 15:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lineage 3 possibly different than Lineage Eternal? (Sequel section) 

message: (diff) Content on WP needs to be sourced and verifiable. Please add reliable, secondary sources or revert your edit. czar 15:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced content 

message: Did a quick copyedit of the article and removed a lot of content from the "Gameplay" section, as it went into excessive detail. I suggest pointing interested readers to the Fandom wiki or L2Wiki. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 )  01:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyeditor passing by
Talk:Jack Lewis, Baron Lewis of Newnham

message: Under "Education and personal life" it is stated "he graduated in 1949 with a bachelor's degree in chemistry from the University of London, after which he moved to the University of Nottingham", but in the Periodic video episode about him (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlblfJL0xhY) it says he started at Nottingham in 1946 (we are even shown his record card with these years written on).
Could anyone who has a little more information about his studies correct this? Thank you.
Globulariifolia (talk) 19:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible date confusion
Talk:Chainfire

message: Hi all.  I shortened the plot intro to make it less specific - if people want more information the plot summary is right below.  Now it reads less like the back of a book and more like a brief introduction to the rest of the article.  Congratulations Mystar, by the way, a nice edit on your part.  I took out subtractive magic 'cause the word magic alone is enough to give a sense of how he was healed (i.e. supernaturally) while 'subtractive magic' requires a greater background knowledge of the series that I think is inappropriate for a brief intro.  I also took out a sentence in the plot summary 'cause it didn't make sense - you'll see it when you compare version.  I didn't change it because I'm not sure what actually happens in the books, so I figured I'd leave it up to you.  It's right after "Chainfire" in the second-last paragraph.  The sentence I took out was " Richard, Nicci and Cara travel back Richard leaves the Palace and his army to find Kahlan and to prevent..." and I think it's obvious that there needs to be more info.  
WLU 15:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot intro
Talk:De Nardi

message: timothy jones was one of their major riders? really? He was a good climber but i wouldn't say one of the major riders for the team. I just wouldn't. Phil Nolte (talk) 12:05, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As ever, such uncited lists should probably be removed - which I have now done. SeveroTC 16:05, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: timothy jones

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Domina Vacanze. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 16#Domina Vacanze until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Jalen Folf (talk) 15:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Domina Vacanze" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Jervis Bay Nuclear Power Plant

message: The SGHWR was a steam generating heavy water reactor, and only ever existed as a prototype, at Winfrith Heath in Dorset in the UK. Had they won this tender they may well have received another from South Africa, but they never received any orders at all, and the prototype closed down some years later. Andrewa 03:23, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: SGHWR

message: The following text has been added, citing an unpublished letter as a source:
Organizations like the World Union for Protection of Life‎, the Ecology Action and the Society for Responsibilty in Science had tried to ward off the dangers connected with the nuclear power plantLetter from Harry F. Kurth, World Union for Protection of Life, President of the South East Asia and Oceanic Region, to Joshua Lederberg, 8 April 1972.
WP:RS says that "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."  As this is not the case here, I plan to remove the above text. Johnfos (talk) 00:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Johnfos (talk) 00:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

text: The text is back in for some reason, and it's now linking to a US TV station. In any case I can't see why the text is there in the first place - there is no apparent link to the power plant proposal (being dated 1972) - so have deleted it . 120.153.109.2 (talk) 02:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Letter as a source

message: The article says that the proposed work would have been done in collaboration with "the British organisation The Nuclear Power Group".
There really isn't, and as far as I can tell never has been, an substantive organisation called "The Nuclear Power Group" in Britain. I'd suspect that this name was used, during the tendering process, by a consortium of the government, government-owned, and private industry bodies that already managed nuclear power in the United Kingdom and fancied turning that into an export business. So rather than an uninformative redlink to a largely paper organisation, it would be better if the article read something like "the The Nuclear Power Group, a consortium of XXX and YYY and ZZZ". Unfortunately the ref for this section is a book, to which I don't have access. So, what or who were  "The Nuclear Power Group"? -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 14:12, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Nuclear Power Group"
Talk:Shoshenq II

message: Article is confused.  -x42bn6 03:29, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I was just acting on the fact the revision at which I saw this article had Shoshenq, Sheshonq and a few other variants, conflicting ideas (apparently) and some weird structure.  I just thought I'd stick the  reason here.  Oh, I'm no expert on Egyptian anything either.  :)  -x42bn6 08:59, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>{{cleanup}}</nowiki> 

message: There is a whole lot of uncited, or poorly cited (no page numbers, footnotes, and so on), material here. Worse, the article is blatantly arguing a point rather than just giving the facts and/or citing the published arguments of Egyptologists (i.e., it is original research) Klompje7 14:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 
Talk:Euskaltel–Euskadi (1994–2013)

message: Is there a sourced reference of the origins of riders that this team is willing to take on.  It has a French Basque, and has had in the past a Venezuelan who, to judge by his surname, was of Basque heritage.  
Of the current squad, the majority are Basques, but there are at least 7 born in Navarre (Aramendia, Martínez, Nieve, Oroz, Alan Pérez, Sesma and Urtasun), and one Asturian (Sam Sánchez).  
Apart from Samu, all seem to comply to "formado por deportistas que hayan nacido en los Territorios Históricos de Alava, Bizkaia, Gipuzkoa y Navarra"; does he conform to  "o que se hayan formado en las canteras de los referidos territorios" (Foundation statement on FEC website).  Kevin McE (talk) 08:29, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restrictions on selection 
Talk:Hôtel de Ville, Paris

message: Quoth the article:
:The original Hôtel de Ville ... was burnt by the local population during the Paris Commune of 1871. The current building was designed by the architects Théodore Ballu and Pierre Deperthes, and replaced the earlier Hôtel de Ville on the same site. The building has been the scene of a number of notable events, including the declaration of the French Third Republic...
The way the article is structured now seems to imply that the current building saw the declaration of the 3rd Republic -- but such a declaration would have happened in 1870, before the original was burned down.  Something ain't right... --Jfruh 03:47, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The 3rd Republic was declared in the building before the fire of 1871. Yet the stone shell of the pre-1871 Hôtel de Ville is still used in the current Hôtel de Ville, so it's essentially the same building, heavily restored and refurbished, that's why it makes sense to say that the Hôtel de Ville saw the declaration of the 3rd Repulic. Hardouin 12:29, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well then "replaced" and "rebuilt entirely" are poor choices of words - I'll rewrite. --Jfruh 15:31, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Garbled chronology

message: The section "Nearby places" is written as such;
:"The northern (left) side of the building is located on the Rue de Rivoli. The nearby Bazar de l'Hôtel de Ville (BHV) is a department store named after the Hôtel de Ville. The closest church of Hôtel de Ville is the St-Gervais-et-St-Protais Church."
While I see nothing wrong with the first sentence, the references to a church and a department store, with links to their own pages, seems not to meet Wikipedia's standards, and may be mistaken for advertisement, bassed on its current language. See WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTPROMOTION. For this reason, I have tagged this section as having advertisement- or dirrectory-like language. If you dissagree, please free to reply and delete it. Otherwise, I beleive the section had ought to be rewriten, with a less-promotional tone. --M. Schneider  [Schneider anc]  (talk • contribs) 06:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertizement-like language 
Talk:OS/360

message: I don't think it's wholly unreasonable to tag this with :Category:Software engineering disasters - although now that I look at the contents of that category, I'm reconsidering! It was extremely late, extremely over-budget, extremely over-sized - you name it, along almost every axis it was a nightmare. A smaller company might have been sunk by such a problem - and many were, by smaller ones! Brooks himself had to step down from running the entire System/360 project to overseeing OS/360 to try and pull their irons out of the fire. Yes, it eventually got going, and was not too bad - but as Milo Medin's saying goes, "with enough thrust, anything will fly". Noel (talk) 03:49, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A disaster?

message: After a big edit of MVS I concluded that the whole set of articles about IBM mainframe operating systems from System/360 onwards needed to be re-structured to  minimise overlap and to make clearer the evolutionary relationships between these operating systems (notably in memory management, which is historically a major distinguishing feature). There is already some support for this proposal. Please add comments at Talk: MVS. Philcha 23:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Restructure of articles about IBM mainframe operating systems

message: As part of the proposed restructure of articles on IBM mainframe operating systems (above), I've rewritten Job Control Language to: cover IBM's DOS/360 and its descendants as well as OS/360 and its descendants; focus more on the facilities and flavour of the 2 JCLs rather than on details of  some statement types and some of their options. Please comment in Talk: Job Control Language. I'd be particulary grateful for more info on DOS/360 and its descendants, especially after 1980 - I only used DOS JCL a handful of times, and only in the late 1970s.
The rewrite does not currently take account of Truthanado's point in Talk: Job Control Language about use of "JCL" by computer suppliers other than IBM, which may entail further restructuring of articles about JCLs.Philcha 00:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite of [[Job Control Language]] in progress
File talk:WMD.png

message: The chemical warfare symbol is a dark background with nondark twin grenades (picture a comma tilted about 80, 70 degrees to the left, with an exaggerated tail) crossed, my interpretation of which is artillery shells trailing gas, which is incorrect (unless airburst) but memorable. The molecule(?) depiction is inaccurate.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.180.217.134 (talk • contribs) . 03:55, 17 August 2005 
:This symbol is quite new. See http://www.cs.amedd.army.mil/simcenter/chemical_symbol_story.htm for additional information.
:Old and new versions could be added to the chemical hazard page.
: Talamus 16:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol inaccurate 

message: Would it be possible to label the different symbols so that one could know which was which? --Jontsang 19:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  labels
Talk:Bible Students

message: This page was renamed to Associated Bible Students, see Talk:Associated Bible Students for a discussion on the renaming. --86.33.194.54 21:01, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

message: As near as I can tell, all the articles linked on this page are organizations that derived one way or another from the Bible Student movement and are covered in that article. I think it would be better to direct this page to that one. Objections? --Art Carlson (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation?
Talk:BMW M1

message: I am removing the claim of the Group B Championship in 1984 since it is wrong. Please see World Rally Championship for more details but both the manufacturer's title and the driver title was won by Audi that year. It's possible that the orig author might have had a different BMW championship in mind but it's definitely not Group B.
Have a nice day!
cyberroach  —Preceding undated comment added 23:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group B Championship Claim 

message: I've seen pictures of an M1 art car suppossedly painted by Warhol, should that not be mentioned here?(86.31.187.246 (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if there is a reliable source.  Though it sounds a bit like trivia to me. swaq 16:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems pretty reliable to me: A photo of him painting the car. http://www.armandocruz.com/people-just-paint-there-car-for-new-years/ And photos of the finished car. http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9721889 It would be cool if we could get one in the article. I mean, lets face it, that's pretty damn cool. --98.232.176.109 (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andy Warhol 

message: Its quite impossible that BMW would put a 3.5L engine in a 745i, as the model number denotes the car and engine size (the 745i has a 4.5L engine, which was also a V8 not a 6 cylinder). Although a few discrepancies exist (such as the 525e which had a 2.8 motor built for economy) however such discrepancies are minor and not misleading. 
Perhaps what the writer meant to say a "735i" or that the 745i engine concept was based on M1's engine. Otherwise such a statement is inaccurate and discredit's the article. Could this be changed.  added by Mark4life (talk • [[08:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "version of the BMW 745i" 

message: So how many of these were built? --98.232.176.109 (talk) 08:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Production figure?

message: As mentioned in the article, vehicle code is E26. Shouldn't it be renamed BMW M1 (E26)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GGir (talk • contribs) 02:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  E21? 

message: The production numbers do not agree. For instance, the opening section states 456 units were built, but the right-side summary states 455. What is the correct number?
Semvhu (talk) 19:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct production numbers? 
Talk:6.12.

message: is a review in Norwegian. But since I don't speak Norwegian, I have no clue whether it's favorable/not. --Mairi 04:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Norwegian Review
Talk:Harvest Moon: Another Wonderful Life

message: If I recall, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a cheat guide. Is this really appropriate for Wikipedia? Eltargrim 17:09, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheats Section Appropriate? 

message: As mentioned in the to-do list, we need some pictures in this article!  The one at the top is fine, but it's too small.  I compared it to other pictures in video game articles, and the front cover picture can usually reach the size limit of 250 px.  However, if we did this to this picture, it would look blurry, so we need a bigger one, in addition to some more pictures.  I actually found some, but I can't upload them myself, so could someone please do it?  The pictures are:
*Here's a bigger version of the front cover of the game
*This a website containing many pictures.  The ones we need are the pictures named, "Heard of Bird Flu," "Ready for Lovin," "Who Left the Stove On," and "Nude Swim Coming Up." (Don't worry - it's not actually nude at all - these pictures just have weird names)
*Here's a picture of the player character, the three possible spouses, the three children, and some animals
Once they're uploaded, I'll add the copyright tags, sources, and put them in the right place in the article.  Thanks in advance, and I'm sorry if I'm being a hassle! --71.118.145.48 19:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: 按此可將縮圖變更大的圖像於, which was what the article was calling the game in Japanese, is actually Chinese for "click here for a larger image than the thumbnail".  I've removed it from the page, because that's obviously not correct.  Maybe someone who knows the proper Japanese name for the game would like to put that in the article instead.  --Sckchui 09:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese name for the game?
Talk:Fremont Peak (Wyoming)

message: The redirect Fremont Peak (Wyoming has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 20:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Fremont Peak (Wyoming]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Spruce Knob

message: Does it not seem like this article should just be combined with Spruce Mountain? Having an article just on the peak of a mountain seems kinda silly, and that two articles would just have way too much overlapping info. Murderbike (talk) 18:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Trouble is, the Knob is far and away more famous than the Mountain. (Also, there is as yet no article on the Mountain anyway). Valerius Tygart (talk) 13:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 
Talk:Christian Youth Theater

message: This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. Paul August ☎ 17:43, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
This is my first attempt at this type of article. It still needs some work, which is why I added the cleanup tag to it. In general, I'd like to see the article expanded a little bit and more specifics added.
---
It's important to verify the names under Notable Alumni. There are a lot of children affiliated with this organization, so I've found many not so notable people listed there, as a result of multiple phantom edits. I counted 4 total. I went ahead and removed them, and added 2 actual notable people.
---  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.214.63.75 (talk) 20:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

message: This has been in the lead for some time. What in the world does it mean?
:"CYT is an arts educational balls... "
Maybe a little research will turn up that it was originally something else and is actually vandalism that never got caught. I'll check. -- MelanieN (talk) 02:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it. It was changed from "arts educational organization" in 2016 for heavens sake! -- MelanieN (talk) 02:53, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting that one! Tacyarg (talk) 08:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Talk:ATOM Award

message: The impetus for creating this article was The 20 Cent Quest, which scraped through a Vfd.  'Twas suggested that the article might be merged with "ATOM Award", which didn't actually exist at the time.  Now that it does, I've no idea how to go about it.  Perhaps someone who knows more than I about these awards could write about past winners?
--fuddlemark 04:53, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like more than one ATOM award winning animation has its own article. I see no reason not to keep them as separate articles. No need to merge anything for now. -- œ™ 06:57, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:André Stander

message: Andre Stander tell you he was Afrikaner did he, before he died?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.76.72.199 (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anything about his origin, Dutch, British, German ...? To my ears the name sounds German. --85.178.232.188 (talk) 16:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin? 

message: Was Andre Stander an Afrikaner?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.215.48.46 (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Andre Stander an Afrikaner? 
Talk:Yavatmal district

message: My spider sense is tingling. The last edit of the demographic data seems a little arbitrary to me. Can someone please provide a citation? Dybeck 10:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics 

message: The culture section was originally created in wiki page of yavatmal city. I moved it here, and did some changes while moving it.
The residents of Yavatmal district should help verifying, and editing this section as well as the entire page. usernamekiran (talk) 23:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help required on "culture" section 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed