Talk:Paramount Network

message: Why was it moved from Spike TV? They may just say "Spike" on-screen, but the channel is still OFFICIALLY known as Spike TV. If no one objects I will move it back later today. TJ Spyke 20:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I do not know who tagged the article with "unreferenced," but I think I know why.  Please source the demographic statements at the end of the opening paragraph. - Desmond Hobson 22:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics

message: I have asked an admin with a lot of experience in fair use images. This is her reply:
:That's quite a tough one because there is no strict guideline where you could point and say: here it is! (BTW, I am not keeping up with latest developments on fair use policies) My take at this: If someone wrote an article Logos of Spike TV or a decent section about them then it would be ok to show all those logos (of course, the article might be subject to WP:OR and notability guidelines). As of right now, it is a violation of the policy because there are too many of them (FUC#3), they do not identify the subject of the article (the first logo used in the infobox does, FUC#8), they do not illustrate text (in fact the section has no text, FUC#8). Also practical look: such galleries do not belong to articles in any case, even if the images are free (Wikipedia is not an image gallery). That's my take on this. Renata 03:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally just came to this page to see all the old logos and remember the past... I guess Wikipedia isn't about maintaining all knowledge.  Unfortunate.  -24.141.153.56 05:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery of logos 

message: When Spike TV was know as TNN-The National Network/the New TNN, they have a special version of the logo used from 2000 to 2003 when they had WWF/WWE programming on. this logo had the letters TNN styled in the WWF/WWE scratch logo font that the WWE/WWF used for their attitude era logo and the current WWE logo. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Boutitbenza 69 9 (talk • contribs) 05:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special logo for WWF/WWE programming during the years 2000-2003 

message: :Image:TNNlogo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TNNlogo.PNG

message: _ _ This title is too cryptic for a section, in spite of the sent in the lead 'graph that says
: By mid-2006, the on-screen name was shortened to simply "Spike."
(And i, for one, am likely not to read the lead for inside-baseball details on large topics i'm already acquainted with.) It doesn't sound like the name change was even a clearly recognizable event, let alone a notable one, let alone one that characterizes the roughly 3 years since the end of the preceding section's scope, as a section title must.
_ _ I doubt i have the best perspective to fix this mess, but i can improve it, and others can work from there.--Jerzy•t 18:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? : "Spike TV/Spike (2003-present)" section 

message: :Image:Thenewtnnlogo1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Thenewtnnlogo1.gif

message: I suggest we split this article into TNN (TV channel) and Spike (TV channel). The TNN sections are taking up nearly half the article, and I think there is sufficient information and references in that article to create a separate one and leave this article to Spike alone. --Zpb52 (talk) 03:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong Oppose Standard convention on other pages it keep its total history intact despite a format change.  No reason to change that here.  Examples include ION Television, Investigation Discovery, Versus (TV channel), Hallmark Channel and TruTV.  Convention changes should be decided at Wikipedia:WikiProject Television -- Cmjc80 (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Very strong oppose Just like what Cmjc80 said up there, there is no reason to do the split. Many pages have this type of merge, and it keeps well. This article is also like that. If we split this page, it would be almost like 2 stubs because both of the networks on the page seem to just fit together, plus it would just be a waste of time that could be used on other pages. WWEISREAL 15:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: *Vote For - nominating vote --Zpb52 (talk) 03:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for

message: :Strong Oppose Standard convention on other pages it keep its total history intact despite a format change.  No reason to change that here.  Examples include ION Television, Investigation Discovery, Versus (TV channel), Hallmark Channel and TruTV.  Convention changes should be decided at Wikipedia:WikiProject Television -- Cmjc80 (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Very strong oppose Just like what Cmjc80 said up there, there is no reason to do the split. Many pages have this type of merge, and it keeps well. This article is also like that. If we split this page, it would be almost like 2 stubs because both of the networks on the page seem to just fit together, plus it would just be a waste of time that could be used on other pages. WWEISREAL 15:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes against

message: Looks like there's no objection (or anything, for that matter), so I'm going to go ahead and split these articles. --Zpb52 (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral votes

message: Entry says "Texas based Gaylord Entertainment," but the Gaylord Entertainment entry gives no indication that it was ever Texas-based, although they have a hotel in Texas.  It was previously part of an Oklahoma publisher, and now is headquartered in Tennessee.  I'm removing the "Texas based." Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 20:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaylord Entertainment 

message: "Today, after several changes of ownership and name, Spike operates as part of MTV Networks, owned by Viacom and is one of 4 to not belong to a brand."
I have no idea what this is trying to say.  Can someone clean it up? Lexicon (talk) 03:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: Rumors on this YouTube page shows "at 6:00am﻿ on July 22, 2010 Spike TV left digital cable and satellite for directv and dish network after an episode Jail replaced by New Nick GAS for My Family's Got Guts & BrainSurge." by YouTube Username, lerdalparker23. This has however not been verified by MTV Networks, Viacom or Nickelodeon Productions  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.245.11.74 (talk) 19:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Nick Gas 

message: Way to go Mike for showing Youtube Users that their videos are being stolen! WOOT!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by StuPeg (talk • contribs) 04:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  GIVE W007 FOE MIKE MOZART! 

message: Does this really belong in this article? YouTube was also launched in 2005, which later suffered a class action lawsuit reported to be over $1 billion. Spike.com's managing division claims that they only host videos they approve after they are submitted.[36] YouTube Partner user Mike Mozart pointed out videos on Spike.com/iFilm that were uploaded from YouTube onto Spike.com, without permission as their descriptions are criticizing the video itself. He also pointed out that YouTube embeds hosted on Spike.com did not link back to YouTube, and any sort of video hyperlinking was forcibly disabled, contradicting YouTube's Terms of Use.[37]
This link goes to a YouTube video where a man talks about toys. 
I do not think it adds much to the article.--BeckiGreen (talk) 00:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Spike (TV network). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100218104440/http://www.tnawrestling.com:80/news/item/1772-impact-moves-to-mondays-on-march-8 to http://www.tnawrestling.com/news/item/1772-impact-moves-to-mondays-on-march-8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: sorry but it wasnt its airing of WWF programming that started its wrestling years
its well known that between 1999 & 2000 TNN briefly aired (it is surmised as a test run for wrestling on the network) episodes of ECW on TNN
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECW_on_TNN
Tony Spike (talk) 23:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrestling on TNN 

message: When Spike becomes the Paramount Network next year, it may have the rights to all the classic Star Trek shows and movies. At the moment, those classic Star Trek shows are currently airing on H&I. AdamDeanHall (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: CBS Studios owns the Star Trek rights. Viacom can't do anything unless they pay licensing fees to CBS for the shows and films, and CBS basically pays nothing to put it on CBS All Access. That arrangement isn't changing (and 98% of people are loyal to the title itself, not whatever the studio is on the end card). Nate • (chatter) 03:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Star Trek" on the Paramount Network 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Spike (TV channel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930183808/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/apr01/apr09/1_mon/news2monday.html to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/apr01/apr09/1_mon/news2monday.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930183808/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/apr01/apr09/1_mon/news2monday.html to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/apr01/apr09/1_mon/news2monday.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Don't offer a show on your network then take it off your network sounds like a scam. 2603:8081:5F02:B823:FD46:C4E6:C585:7E61 (talk) 05:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  scam 

message: Is there anyway you can put on new commercials instead of the same ones I have seen for the past 10 years.....both tattoo ones are so old you can smell the musky smell from them and the wife swap is just pathetic just like the TV show..... 96.30.155.47 (talk) 02:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercials 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: I was just wondering. Why don't we make the infobox for Spike Cable Networks, Inc.? This is something we could do for the copyright holder for Paramount Network as well as other holders from MTV Entertainment Group. RamsesTimeGame (talk) 04:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spike Cable Networks 

message: Nickelodeon MTV The Cw Comedy Central 5.212.245.54 (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paramount Networks 

message: نیکلودن ام تی وی سای کمدی سنترال 5.212.245.54 (talk) 14:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  شبکه های پارامونت 

message: Yes there has to be advertising but Paramount has too many and they are long I very seldom watch the network because of that. 2600:6C5D:4100:F29:40C6:B87C:D843:7891 (talk) 19:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising