lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ghost Rider (Danny Ketch)

message: Can you guys talk about his recent return to Marvel? (JoeLoeb (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alive? 

message: I heard he once attempted to look into the eyes of Galactus
any truth? --74.178.228.14 (talk) 01:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penance Stare 

message: There are some grammatical corrections that still need to be made in order to make the article flow smoother. Someone needs to take the time to correct all the run on sentences and dlete all the information that is not pertinent to this article.  DefenderV (talk) 06:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar/Flow
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Delinquent Road Hazards

message: I herewith maintain that the page for The Delinquent Road Hazards should NOT be deleted.  While I agree that information on each vehicle (viz., DJ, Wingo, Snot Rod, Boost, etc.) does not warrant individual entries, this one article is THE SOLITARY, yet primary source of information on that whole group of characters, which is priceless.  Even just having a place for the JPEG photos of these cars argues for the retention of this article.  Where else would the inquiring mind find useful information on these vehicles were it not for Wikipedia's diligence in creating this article in the first place?  Please do not flush this valuable information into cyberspace oblivion!!!!  We NEED this article to REMAIN in the cache of information on the CARS movie, as provided by Wikipedia!  KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, KEEP ALL YOUR GOOD WORK, AND DO NOT DELETE THE ARTICLE ... PLEASE!
Rpaltza 23:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-01-02/Experanza

message: I knew Esperanza was a net negative when they started sending around barnstar police, to lecture people on the proper use of barnstars on their pages ... barnstars being awards that people independently gave each other without the benefit of an overarching organisation to teach them their correct application. 
And, from Uncyclopedia: Hope sucked out of Wikipedia, experts report - David Gerard 23:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I missed both MfDs... thankfully... but, is this really news on Wikipedia?  If so, something is not going right. gren グレン 17:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it's news... Esperanza had a lot of supporters. The "something going right" bit is surely that it's closed down? What I personally fail to understand, however, is why we still have the Birthday Committee?! (Esperanza Lite?) --kingboyk 21:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Modulation error ratio

message: In what way is MER different from post-receiver-filter 1/SNR?  According to this article, they are identical; therefore this article should really just be a redirect to Signal-to-noise ratio.  Oli Filth 23:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The external link you've given actually defines "MER" as (received signal)/(error), i.e. the reciprocal of what this article current says. Oli Filth 00:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, MER in decibels is usually a positive number. And as you probably already realized, MER includes all ipmerfections, only including noise. Especially in older analog implementations there are many non-stochastic nonidealities as IQ phase and amplitude error, carrier suppression, or amplitude compression at the corners (ETSI ETR 290). Thanks for reviewing, I'll fix. Alinja 07:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SNR? 

message: Being a wireless digital guy, I too had never heard of MER until someone mentioned it to me in a recent email. If it's a specialized term used only in the CATV world, shouldn't there be a note to this effect in the article? Also, if there's this much confusion over whether it's error/signal or signal/error, that too should be explained in the article and a [sic] placed next to the formulae. Karn (talk) 01:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Special use by catv industry?

message: ... as well defined root mean square values is passible of calculation, but do not have any phisical meaning and, so, no practice use.
There is no such a thing called "RMS power", as expressed by 'square root of average value of squared function' with phisical meaning and useful pratice.
Although RMS value for any given power function may be evalueted — and this is correct! — such an encountered result shows no meaning and useful pratice.
IF ANYONE CAN PROOF I AM WRONG, PLEASE, I AM WAITING FOR. THANKS FOR ALL.
Aainitio (talk) 19:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RMS power...
Talk:Gillette Fusion

message: according to the TV add, Gillette's scientists have finally harnessed the power of fusion and used it to............add a fifth razor blade. -- Bubbachuck 23:12, 3 January 2007 (UT
*I have to profess to a degree of amusement that to illustrate the Fusion, they use the metaphor of a particle accelerator - a device used for fission. ;-) Kinitawowi 09:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV commercial (satire) 

message: I've added a sentence on the R&D costs of Fusion I saw in an old BusinessWeek article, mentioning the costs as "slightly less than the $680 million it spent on Mach3".  However, the Mach3 page indicates it cost over $750m.  I suppose it depends what does and doesn't get included in the budget, eg. initial marketing costs, coupled with the activation of Gillette's mighty hyperbole generator.  I'll also say that although $680m sounds a lot for "adding an extra blade", it probably includes the cost of a lot of bluesky research in different directions; a lot of trials; new factories capable of producing billions of blades a year; and a global advertising campaign.  Still a bit ridiculous, though.  --Gid (talk) 13:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  R&D Cost 

message: This article is obviously a stub, and in my opinion the razor doesn't deserve its own article. I'm recommending that it be merged with Global Gillette, which already has a blurb of comparable size to this article. -TVK (talk) 03:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Poteau River

message: This article satisfies the requirements for Start class. I have made the change for WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 18:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, changed to start class for other projects...Jokulhlaup (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification
Talk:Diomedes of Tarsus

message: why did this get redirected? I can't find the original article now. 99.155.187.235 (talk) 05:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tekkō

message: I assert that this article is a work of speculative fiction based on a video game.  Can anyone prove me wrong.  And, oh yes, the onus is on you to do so. -- Rogerborg 23:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur. However I easily found and added some external links to the article for you. You really should look at getting your Google repaired! ;-) Bezapt 11:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll bite. The tekko is mentioned in "Ancient Okinawan Martial Arts: Koryu Uchinadi" on page 21, compiled by Patrick McCarthy et al, published by Tuttle Publishing in September 1999, ISBN: 0804831475. I've also seen reference to them as "tekken" (roughly "hand blade"), along with many images that more closely resemble their origin... as a horseshoe. 68.108.104.183 09:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bishop, M. (1996) Zen Kobudo: Mysteries of Okinawan weaponry and Te. Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle Co.
Bolz, M. (1995) The Okinwan Sai: Kobudo weapon for self-defence. Journal of Asian Martial Arts, Vol. 4(1) pp. 85-99.
Clarke, M. (1995) Hirokazu Kanazawa (Interview), Budo Dojo, winter.
McCarthy P. (1998) International Ryukyu Karate Research Society,
Minowa, K. (1998) Personal communication.
Nakamoto, M. (1983) Okinawa Ryukyu Kobudo: It's history and spirit. Naha: Okiinsha.
                     Okinawaweapons (talk) 21:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Materials

message: This article is too messy. It is just one long page of text, no specific sections at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.14.222 (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:PAVE

message: What about HAVE?
* AN/FPS-129 HAVE STARE radar
* Lockheed Have Blue program
Does anyone know anything about this? Have simply redirects to possession. --Joffeloff 23:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have 

message: Some official sources list program names in uppercase, others don't. Is there a recognised standard, either in DoD or Wikipedia?
Simon Brady (talk) 21:25, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PAVE vs Pave 

message: The original system, used in helicopters (The PAVE Low and PAVE Hawk)  - the source used is demonstrably wrong: .--Vidkun (talk) 08:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original system?
Talk:Anne Pratt

message: Hi.
I wrote the article, but I have more to add to it. I will be adding more information, e.g, when she was a human, and leading up to her being made a vampire etc. Including, segments from Lies My Parents Told Me, i.e her quotes. I only joined today, so please give me a break, as I am new to Wikipedia!
I think she is a very important character! If it weren't for her, William wouldnt even exist! Please don't delete it!
Slayer3 23:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Renato Bruson

message: * References say that his British debut was at the Edinburgh Festival. I think that refers to the Edinburgh International Festival, so this is what I wrote.
* Some sources report that he was born in the city of Granze instead of Este, as I have indicated. I chose the latter because this is what the Grove says but some clarification is needed.
* Some sources report that he has won the Grammy but a search in the Grammy web site has shown none.
Luca priorelli 23:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Renato Bruson took the leading role of the Venetian Doge Francesco Foscari in Verdi's opera I due Foscari. He sang in the 1988 La Scala production directed by Gianandrea Gavazzeni.
Please add this information to the list of his roles. Lydia Goldbloom (talk) 17:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renato Bruson roles
Talk:Amesbury, Toronto

message: The first paragraph, the latter part of the first sentence even, is gibberish... I understand that there are a lot of parks! Great! It is an area of high immigrant populations! Why, 'cos there are a lot of parks? There is a distinct lack of context in this article.LessHeard vanU 23:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: incorrect MP MPP 216.208.219.29 (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  your MP and MPP are incorrect 

message: incorrect MP MPP 216.208.219.29 (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  your MP and MPP are incorrect
Template talk:WikiProject Dogs

message: Is it possible to add a link to a comments subpage after the page is rated? --Pharaoh Hound (talk) 23:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the feature, let me know if it has any problems. Rfrisbietalk 00:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried it on Talk:American Cocker Spaniel, seems to work great. Thanks --Pharaoh Hound (talk) 13:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to comment page

message: its hard to know, as there is no box that says if the article is top priority, low priority or what. ACBestMy Contributions 10:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been fixed. Coaster1983 (talk) 06:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  top, low or high? 

message: Hi there. I'm not really experienced with templates, so could those who understand them better work on this template's documentation?  Thanks.  ~PescoSo say•we all 13:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template documentation
Talk:Blue Whale of Catoosa

message: Hello every one,
I'm going to translate this article to the Spanish but I've got a problem because I don't know the meaning of "waterfront structure" in Spanish. The google traductor translate it like "estructura de costa", but I think that is wrong because if we translate it to English is something like "coast structure" but the Whale is not on the coast. Can someone give me a better translation?
Thanks,
Fuegon (talk) 14:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation to Spanish 
Talk:Canals in Cheshire

message: *Rochdale Canal
** As far as I'm aware, no part of the canal even touches Cheshire!
*Ashton Canal
** Clearly the Stockport Branch Canal (now infilled) once went into Cheshire, but that has its own page.
** At Ashton-under-Lyne, the canal is immediately adjacent to the River Tame, which forms the Lancashire - Cheshire border, but the canal is on the Lancashire side. It all depends on where (to the exact foot!) the Peak Forest Canal starts. If the Tame aqueduct is all part of the Ashton Canal then I concede that there are a few feet of this canal in Cheshire!!
Mayalld 12:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and Ashton's in Greater Manchester now anyway! I'll remove them. They're in the Cheshire Ring anyway. Salinae 15:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do these canals belong here?
Talk:Touch FM (Coventry)

message: It has been claimed in this article that:
"The station has lost roughly 30% of its listeners since the CN Group rebranded the station.
(RAJAR Qs 1-3 2006 - detailed information can be found at www.rajar.co.uk)"
I've looked on Rajar, and have gleaned the following:
* Q4 05: Kix 96 - 60,000 listeners (reach)
* Q1 06: Touch FM Coventry - 49,000 listeners (reach)
Q2 & Q3 results cannot be compared as the Coventry output has been lumped in with that of Banbury and the Warwickshire stations.
So the best that can be said is that the station lost 18% of its listeners between Dec 05 and Mar 06.  Very little can be said about results since, which of course might include a rise in listening. Chillysnow 23:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Audience Figures

message: Wasn't this radio station named Radio Harmony from it's 1990 launch until circa 1995 and then operating on the 102.6 FM frequency ?
Curran1980 17:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right, a quick peek in my Radio Authority book from 1994 confirms this.  I've added the info to the main page. Chillysnow 18:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Station Name

message: How do we know this material is up to date? RJFJR (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: On air staff

message: At the same time as this station was called Kix 96, there was (and still is) a Mix 96 fifty miles or so south in Aylesbury. I would be surprised if this was a coincidence. What was the relationship between the two stations? Beorhtwulf (talk) 19:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mix 96
Talk:Kōtarō Yoshida (martial artist)

message: I have moved the following comment, which was originally placed at the end of the article, to here. Bradford44 16:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Misplaced comment

message: Here is a letter from Richard Kim to a Japanese resercher.Kadzuwo 19:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation with [[Choi Yong Sul]] (吉田朝男), the founder of [[Hapkido]]

message: Could be usefull to edit a photograph of the mon from the Yoshida family .
Logglog (talk) 10:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoshida-Mon 
Talk:Liberation (Talib Kweli and Madlib album)

message: “Liberation, released on Talib Kweli’s label Blacksmith Music, was introduced to their fans when the first track was leaked, Funny Money. Following the leak, Kweli posted a blog to his fans on Myspace (www.myspace.com/talibkweli) informing them that this was just a sample of a new album produced by Madlib of Stones Throw Records. After months of eager fan posts on messageboards across the web, the nine-track project is complete, in time for the new year. As a gift for the new year, fans can download the album here http://www.gimmemoremusic.com/uploads/Liberation_TalibKweli.zip. This album along with the release of the mixtape Talib Kweli Presents: Blacksmith the Movement, are preparing the way the Blacksmith’s artists’ releases beginning at the top of year with Talib Kweli’s Ear Drum.” --Anselm (AnselmP - de.wikipedia.org)
Where do you get this information?  This is incorrect.  Funny Money did not "leak" - it was posted by both Madlib and Talib Kweli on their respective Myspace pages.  It was then released by Talib Kweli on his Blacksmith mixtape. The link for the free album is no longer valid.  There isn't yet any information on Stones Throw, or those Myspace pages as to whether the album will be available again or released at a later time.  MarcelloRubini 20:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link? 
Talk:Abdel-Hamid ibn Badis

message: * Needs fact checking. Bilingual expert would be helpful to check vs the French version of this article.
* Grammer and language checking.
* Needs sourcing.
* Wiki-links needed in some places.
--Lendorien (talk) 17:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup TO DO 
Talk:Message submission agent

message: As it stands, the article fails to explain how this is an anti-spam measure. What is there to prevent a spam-virus-worm-whatever on a client machine to connect to the configured MSA and try to send spam over that? It seems that blocking random outgoing connections and anti-spam scanning at servers which allow relay are the anti-spam measures here; the fact that there exists something called an MSA on a separate port is fairly tangential. --Joy [shallot] 23:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam connection

message: The reference RFC uses the "Message" term for M in MSA, not "Mail". Rename the article ?
G Allegre (talk) 11:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename to Message Submission Agent

message: It would be wise to include some examples of MSAs.  This is common practise.  Does anyone know of any? --KitchM (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference between MTA and MSA is policy and port, nothing else really, so most intelligent MTAs out there can be configured and used as MSA. I personally use Exim but it's really just one of the many. --grin ✎ 07:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: The article should mention whether the message is submitted under TLS or in the clear.  Port 25 operates in the clear.  Likely 587 does also but it's worth mention.  Does submission under TLS exist? It has another name? Thanks, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TLS? 

message: this article lacks information about submission over tcp port 465 / smtps. RFC8314 recommends smtps. nevertheless, there is SMTPS :-) Niki W. Waibel (talk) 00:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  465? smtps?
Talk:Francis Mitchell

message: really? what about admiral cochrane in the early 19th?--Tresckow (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:No-budget film

message: I removed H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds by Timothy Hines since, in the article, it cited the film as being made for $50,000.00. As most films mentioned here were made for around $1.000.00, perhaps H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds belongs in the low-budget. rather than no budget category. YourInvisibleFriend 00:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Should Colin be added to the list? The fact that it was made for around £50 seems to be something noteworthy to the film (it's in its IMDb trivia, and I remember when it was being marketed interviews would always make mention of the budget)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.199.220 (talk) 19:58, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colin (zombie film) 

message: Is there some special reason we should include Saptaswa Basu?  The citation does not use the phrase "no budget film" anywhere, and the addition was quite promotional.  I don't think he needs to be listed here.  This article was nothing but an example farm until I pruned it down, and it's already starting to turn back into one now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with  that the edits by  seem to violation WP:PROMO and WP:ADVERT. — Cirt (talk) 17:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New addition
Talk:Elizabeth Cary, Viscountess Falkland

message: My professor for English literature has given us an assignment to update/work on/expand a wikipedia page of someone important to English literature. My group and I will be adding and editing the information on this page over the next few days in order to complete this project. If you have any questions please feel free to get in touch with me or my professor RedCKnight. Gcourt18 (talk) 23:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Please put the citations within   tags and move them up to the paragraphs that they support. See User talk:Redcknight for more advice. – Fayenatic London 12:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I made an error in taking Elizabeth Tanfield for Elizabeth Trevannion and Henry for Robert Carey. The entry for Elizabeth Trevannion has the royal guardianship and its date-- Feb 23, 1604. Please permit the removal of my original mistake.Church of the Rain (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Elizabeth Carys 

message: I removed a sentence without sources that needed further explanation: it sounded interesting, but it also sounded like someone's interpretation. Perhaps if it were referenced it could go back. Also removed another sentence that appears, to me at least, to lack neutrality. They are indicated in the edit summary. Happy to discuss either of these edits (or any others) here. — scribblingwoman 02:39, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of edits
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Feydey

message: User:Feydey
      run at Thu Jan 4 00:10:12 2007 GMT
Category talk:	2
Category:	16
Image talk:	28
Image:	743
Mainspace	7208
Portal talk:	29
Portal:	943
Talk:	205
Template talk:	25
Template:	108
User talk:	3564
User:	572
Wikipedia talk:	91
Wikipedia:	2109
avg edits per article	1.43
earliest	21:26, 23 March 2005
number of unique articles	10965
total	15643
Editcount generated using Interiot's wannabe Kate's Tool. Nishkid64 00:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jane Scott (theatre manager)

message: Jane Scott (theater manager)->Jane Scott (theatre manager)
A quibble, I know, but this is an an article about an exclusively UK subject, and to have the US spelling in the title, well .. it's all wrong! I'll wait a couple of weeks before doing anything, but let me know if anyone has any objections to a move.
While this remains a little stubby, there is an argument for incorporating the text in the Adelphi Theatre article, which itself is no opus magnum. Just a suggestion, but I won't push it. Cheers. Kbthompson 09:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please change it! When I initiated the article I originally included her dates; if I had used a description I would have used UK (well, Canadian) spelling. Re. amalgamation: I don't know; I worry about individuals getting lost in larger articles, particularly when they are so little known. But I will go with the general feeling, of course. — scribblingwoman 19:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poss move ... 

message: Just removed a template, added in 2010, that called for footnotes, as there are now several footnotes and a few more sources in general (and if my wifi ever speeds up there may yet be more). If there are any issues, please let me know! — scribblingwoman 00:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing template