lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Geography topics

message: I'm wondering whether Geographic Information Science should be labled as a branch of geography and Geographical Information Systems techniques. Supposed 13:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Are there any guidelines for the use of this template?  I mean is the plan to place this on all geographic articles, every river, every mountain, etc? - Shiftchange (talk) 12:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct template usage? 

message: It is very difficult to make just selection of geographers to be included. Its not like the continents, that there are few and well-defined. There is already geographer categories to use for those who want to explore more on the topic. Further I would argue that the current selection is poor and US-UK-centric. Of course any selection of geographers will be unsatisfying because the criteria for inclusion seem vague. Lappspira (talk) 12:25, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of geographers part

message: Please explain your latest edit here. Your edit summary says "according to Gregory et al., 2002; Holden, 2008; Yin et al., 2008"; please provide full citations and page numbers for these sources here and explain why you believe these sources justify your changes. I am especially concerned about why you believe that the sources you cited justify your removal of items. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 17:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest edit, May 2017 

message: In 2007 Geographic Information Science was suggested as a possible addition as it's own branch. I agree it should have been done then. Today, there are several similar and slightly different terms, but the umbrella term for all of them is Technical Geography. Here is one source on the topic: Haidu, Ionel (2016). "What is Technical Geography - a letter from the editor". Geographia Technica. 11: 1–5. doi:10.21163/GT_2016.111.01.
Increasingly, geographers are moving towards specializing in the methods and applying them broadly to interdisciplinary topics. This is a huge part of the discipline and should be represented as its own distinct branch. 
I added technical geography as a branch to the main Geography page and thought it should be on this as well. 
GeogSage (talk) 04:18, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Technical Geography as a branch

message: Currently these three articles are mentioned like this: Pedology (Edaphology/Soil science). But it should be mentioned Soil science (Pedology / Edaphology), considering that Pedology and Edaphlogy are two fields within Soil sciene? Sr. Freak (talk) 20:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think that is the correct approach, then make the edit. GeogSage  (⚔Chat?⚔)  18:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pedology, Edaphology and Soil science
Talk:4BH

message: The description used to describe this commetrcial radio station appears to come straight from a commercial radio station promo material.  Come on guys there must be something you can write about the history, audience demographic.  Wasn't this station used to call out water side worker numbers during the depression?
:I'm not a big listener of 4BH, but I am of it's sister station 4BC. I'll see if I can find some History.
4KQ was the station that called out the waterside workers numbers.4KQ was owned by the Australian Labour Party [the U was removed in the 1970's]. The numbers were called out each week morning well into the 1960's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.69.107 (talk) 04:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We need some new logos for the Fairfax radio stations we should keep the old ones as historical reference, We need new logos for i.e. 3AW, 4BC etc
They need to be compliant with Wikipedia logo usage policies, and should be placed on the appropriate articles as Southern Cross broadcasting is no longerAdrian90 (talk) 08:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logos needed
Talk:Al-Dhahabi

message: User:Striver asked me to look at this page. I do not understand in what sense he was Syrian. That he was born in Damascus in 673, and Damascus is now the capital of Syria?  Might it not be more accurate to say he was an Umayyad scholar? Tom Harrison Talk 13:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Syrian?

message: I removed this line from the last of Dhahabi's teachers: "He said in his last illness while he was in Mecca: "I will die in this illness because the Prophet -- Allah bless and greet him -- promised me that I would die in Mecca."Al-Dhahabi, al-Mu`jam al-Kabir (1:37)." as it is apparently referring to Dhahabi's teacher and not himself. I say this based upon two points. The first is that Dhahabi died in Damascus as seems apparent in Ibn Hajr's description of his death in al-Durar al-Kaaminah 3/338 where he says that Dhahabi died after returning Egypt. Secondly, Ibn Hajr relates the statement refering to dying in Mecca as originating from Al-Abraquhi, also in al-Durar 1/102-3.Supertouch (talk) 20:54, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of an edit

message: I undid three senseless edits by user: 122.166.97.247. Some of this user's edits were blanking and others simply nonsensical. Supertouch (talk) 08:43, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible vandalism

message: For people who don't realize this, you don't pronounce the L in Al-Dhahabi, it is written as Al-Dhahabi in Arabic, but it is pronounced Ad-Dhahabi. RussianDewey (talk) 23:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it would be "adh-Dhahabi" (or "að-Ðahabi"). - HyperGaruda (talk) 18:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  His name is wrongly pronounced.
Talk:Manatee River

message: This article needs a list of bridges and other crossings over the river (I don't know if there any ferries that cross the river off in the woods). ---------User:DanTD (talk)  21:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the article with an infobox with a list of crossings. It's a start! ♫ TheGridExe (talk)  20:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge and crossing list 
Template talk:Sydney Blacktown suburbs

message: I removed Grantham and Grantham Heights because, according to the website of the Geographical Names Board of New South Wales, Grantham is a neither a suburb or a locality.  (enter "Grantham" into the Placename field) It only lists Grantham Reserve, as being "a public reserve (no.239) situated between Lucretia Road, Mississippi Road and Orinoco Close, in the suburb of Seven Hills, about 1.5 km south from the railway station and near the 'Grantham' Poultry Research Station"  -- Ianblair23 (talk) 13:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hard to argue with... Sorry for any inconvenience. The names are used locally quite frequently but. Albatross2147 02:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hegemony or Survival

message: ive just added the spoiler warning thing (template) --WalterHumala 05:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: spoiler warning
Talk:Behexen

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Bethlehem (band)

message: Shining´s singer is in Bethlehem now? since when?
thanks
--200.55.38.123 19:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any information out there about the artwork supplied to Bethlehem on their albums? If there is any available on the internet (or if someone owns one of their albums and has the information there), then it would be nice to post such information here and on connected wikipedia articles. Thanks. BacktableSpeak to Meabout what I have done 01:05, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bethlehem artwork
Talk:Catamenia (band)

message: The history of this page needs to be moved! don't just copy the content!!! See: Help:move for more information. Also, we now need an admin to help with the move... −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪  kaiden  16:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies. I am obviously not experienced in moving pages. However, I do think this article would be better suited to being under "Catamenia (band)" and having the "Catamenia" page redirect directly to the disambiguation page. However much I love death metal, I was not expecting to run into a Finnish band when I was looking up Catamenia on wikipedia, and I dare say the majority of people looking it up aren't either, or at least enough that it would be appropriate to go directly to the disambiguation page. PyroGamer (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it currently can't be moved to Catamenia (band) because there's history there now. Obviously Catamenia needs to redirect to it's disambiguation page instead. So now we need an admin for the move and I know a few that could help. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪  kaiden  21:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move history not content!!! 
Talk:Countess (band)

message: I reckon, despite the absence of pages for them, that Nazgul's Eyrie Productions and Barbarian Wrath could probably pass notabiliyt guidelines, which in turn would mean that Countess would also pass (owing to multiple albums on both). Blackmetalbaz (talk) 14:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Baz, they also have a long, long entry in Meelhuysen's Encyclopedia, a review in Terrorizer, and perhaps a couple of other things. I've removed the tag. Drmies (talk) 02:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Deströyer 666

message: The correct name of the band has an umlaut, but the umlauted page redirects to this one; housecleaning move. - Revolving Bugbear (formerly Che Nuevara) 18:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  requested move 
Talk:Dragonlord (band)

message: idk how to change it, but Jon Allen links to a Canadian diplomat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.168.12 (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jon Allen link
Talk:Hate Forest

message: The only source for this band being labelled as NSBM is the review on Sputnik, which states that: 
"Lyrically, Hate Forest fall in line with the rest of the National Socialist Black Metal crowd that don't see the irony of championing Nazi-ism in a former Soviet satellite state. Meaning that buried in the belches of Roman Saenko are tales of old Slavic lore cast to display Aryan pride, wrapped around bullshit Nietzsche influenced ideals of supremacy and power, but you can't understand anything that he's saying in the first place so those that are easily offended can still give Purity a listen."
Adam clearly writes that he cannot understand what he is actually singing about. As far as I know there are no lyrics known for any Hate Forest song, so there are only the album names and song titles to try and distinguish any lyrical themes from. I think it is a bit of an overreach to call it NSBM without a source that actually undestands the lyrics, as those are the only thing that makes the difference, especially in the Black Metal scene where it is not uncommon to talk about subjects which are normally "taboo", Or is Immortal's "Pure Holocaust" NSBM as well, just because of the title?
:I must concur. Call it my bias for piquing my curiosity, but I've done much research on whether Hate Forest is truly NSBM or not. I haven't found anything definitive about the band or their politics, and while they're definitely associated with NSBM, so are many non-NSBM bands such as Burzum, Graveland, and Nokturnal Mortum. I've also read many conflicting things about Hate Forest's lyrical themes and sources of inspiration/quotation, but I'd say that the label Osmose Productions clears things up when they say that Hate Forest "were always far from politics," among other things. Nazism and racism in any of its forms are not listed in their lyrical influences either.
:It doesn't matter if the band members are self-proclaimed Nazis; if their music doesn't communicate it, they're not NSBM. If there's no discussion on this for a while, I'll probably try to write a section about it. I have no problems with it being mentioned, but I don't think that it should be presented as definite since there's no definitive evidence. It shouldn't be in the infobox either; NSBM is not a genre of music; it's a subculture. Dusk Malice (talk) 11:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  NSBM?
Talk:Horna

message: this article is not better than Blood Covenant, so i want this article to be deleted!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathmagnetic08 (talk • contribs) 08:09, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is ten times better than Blood Covenant. There are sources, reviews, notable labels. Blood Covanent has nothing and it will be deleted. Undeath (talk) 20:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I smell a troll. = ∫tc 5th Eye 23:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horna? 

message: Some info I've found online indicates that the split album with Behexen might have the title "Vihan Vuodet". Is this right or a separate release that was missed in the article?
(Nevermind, just had a bad eBay listing: http://cgi.ebay.ca/Horna-Behexen-Vihan-Vuodet-CD-Sargeist-Mutiilation_W0QQitemZ250542057783QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMusic_CDs?hash=item3a55786937)
Gamechampionx (talk) 18:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behexen Split Album Title 
Talk:Iranian Students' News Agency

message: Why is the neutrality of this article disputed? لقمانLuqman 14:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is written in an unencyclopedic tone, and sounds boastful. Salad Days 00:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: This page should really be renamed to Iranian_students_news_agency if possible.  It is very confusing as is. --Jp07 (talk) 05:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: Shouldn’t the title of the article and the title of the organization be Iranian Students’ News Agency?  It is punctuated that way on their logo and website. Rmanke (talk) 17:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming title to add punctuation ?
Talk:Nifelheim

message: Well, problem solved? — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally!! You sided with an abject asshole, didn't bother even considering my argument, and reverted my edits, leaving his fanzine as a trusted source and two other noted sources in question. Bang up job you did. I've, at the very least, removed his skeptical POV and unlinked the non existant articles on his fanzines.--Williamsburgland (talk) 02:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So I have no right to call your comments “bullshit” when that is what they are but you have the right to call me an “asshole” and a “worthless moron”? I won’t ask an administrator to block you but won’t mind if they do. And for the last fucking time, this article is not “non existant”; buy the fanzine or the book and see for yourself. --217/83 03:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So in order to validate this I have to buy a $78 book I don't give a shit about, but you absolutely, positively, will not accept verifiable information from freely available sources? Again, dealing with you has been the single worst experience of my entire wikipedian history. You're beyond juvenile and petulant and having been dragged down to your level, I feel bad for you, because it's been miserable. --Williamsburgland (talk) 03:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  WP:AGF, we have no reason to assume that he's lying about what the source says. For the last time, quit with the personal attacks, they do not interest anyone else but yourselves. Please take a break for the day, both of you. And I'll actually read through the Blabbermouth articles. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 03:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Unlike you, Williamsburgland, I accept the information’s presence. I added “according to Blabbermouth.net” because this is what Blabbermouth.net states (might falsify what was written in Sweden Rock, this wouldn’t be the first time) and because you depict this as truth whereas the interview I refer to implies the contrary. And as it doesn’t fit your world view, you claim it is fake and come up with various other ridiculous claims. You obviously never were above my level. --217/83 03:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So I should be skeptical of one of the biggest metal publications on Earth, but take you right at your word? --Williamsburgland (talk) 03:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this your justification for calling me a “POV-pushing” arsehole and a liar who came up with a “fake” interview etc.? Do you consider this to be mature and above my level? --217/83 03:49, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: arbitrary break
Talk:Jasmine Simhalan

message: Current article looks like a copyright violation, but Google can't find it. Valrith 14:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright? 

message: I've just restored the  and  as the article still has no cited references save one. Valrith 02:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Thy Serpent

message: This is page is maintained by me. JazzlineB (talk) 05:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Needs more references, citations. --Bookworm857158367 01:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there are plenty now. JazzlineB (talk) 17:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:Albright and Wilson

message: Hmm, sounds a bit like a PR job for the company here.
I've added the bit about the explosion in Avonmouth,
I believe they had one in Oldbury as well. {anonymous post}
: Well I worked for them from 1970 to 1973 so perhaps I'm biased. They ceased to exist after about 2002, so its hardly PR that will provide them any commercial benefit. 
Albright & Wilson virtually made every commercial phosphorus-based chemical going, they were also into chrome chemicals, detergents, metal finishing, food-hygenic products, match materials. So almost every chemical in that group described in wikipedia under chemistry could have a corresponding paragraph in the A&W article if someone puts it there. Much of wikipedia's chemistry is theoretical and does not cover commercial products. What I've added is public record, I'm not contributing anything that is unreferenced. It only covers the 19th Century, so far, so what you are seeing is a Paternalistic family-owned company.
Pyrotec 16:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Iron Monkey (band)

message: Whilst I was a student at Nottingham Uni, I had the (mis?)fortune to live in the flat underneath a few of the lads from Iron Monkey. They'd invite me and my flatmates in sometimes when we went upstairs to ask them to turn it down a tad, and we'd have a cup of tea or a beer. Lot of foil on the windows and stuff painted on the walls, mind :-) 'Big Loader' is my fave of theirs. Joistmonkey 21:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neighbours
Talk:Ramshorn snail

message: If I am breeding ramshorn snails for colors, should separate color strains be kept separated?
Since the writer did not sign the note, it is not possible to know when this note was written, or who wrote it, but the answer is: yes. However it's worth pointing out that this page is for making comments about improving the article, not general questions or comments about the subject. Also this is an encyclopedia, so the articles should not contain "how=to" advice. However, thank you for your interest. Best, Invertzoo (talk) 21:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: My local pet shop was recently fined by the USDA for having this snail.  Do you know anything about this ban?  Info please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.124.121.100 (talk) 23:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  banned?
Talk:While Heaven Wept

message: That's a pretty strange classification.  I've never really heard a band described as such.  Why not just Doom Metal?
Marcello clerici 04:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classical Doom Metal? 
Talk:Witchfinder General (band)

message: How about something about the 1968 Vincent Price film by the same name?
How about the 1968 Vincent Price film by the same name?128.172.143.99 (talk) 02:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: in the article it states it would be out some timea round january 08. this is well gone, so is the album out yet? thanks in advance for help.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.160.246 (talk) 13:21, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resurrected - the new album
Talk:Abhorrence

message: Abhorrence were a death metal band. This is stated in their metal-archives entry, as well as on rockdetector and band's official site. Someone mistakingly tagged 'em here as doom metal, so I edited it to death metal. Nothingagainst 11:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for doing so, was tagged as Doom on Tomi Koivusaari's page too, which I fixed. By todays standards we probably do sound like doom metal to some extent, but I personally wouldn't call it that now either. It was brutal scandinavian death metal back then and I think it is what it is. --Shrike 20:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Metal
Talk:Diablo (band)

message: Im Planning on working on the Whole Diablo band atm, including albums, members, and the band itself etc. Watch this space :) L Trezise 10:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dimension Zero

message: Since the other band was deleted (so hastefully that when I saw that it was going to be speedied that it was already a red link) would it be safe now to move this back to Dimension Zero or wait for any recreation? --CircafuciX (talk) 23:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I speedy'd the other band page. I've made a request for this page to be moved back at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Uncontroversial_proposals. Funeral 23:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed but the author of the article may create it again (maybe this time with some insertion of notability) so I think we should wait a day or 2 for any response. By the way, that was the fastest speedy I've ever seen. --CircafuciX (talk) 23:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to agree that not moving the article will minimize collateral damage. Dimension Zero redirects to here right now, so anybody looking for the band name alone will wind up here. Note also that this is the second round of article creation attempts for the US band; it had been a while since the first round (which I helped clean up, which is why the article was in my watch list). —C.Fred (talk)  00:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved this page back to distinguish the Swedish band from the US band and addressed the issues of notability on Dimension Zero (US Band). Dimensionzero (talk) 01:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other band deleted 