Talk:Quark star

message: Is it strictly necessary to have strange quarks? If not then "Strange star" requres splitting into a separate section. Zzzzzzzzzzz 03:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See discussion under "Strange Matter" above. And my comment specifically :-) RhinoMind (talk) 13:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Quark non-strange star

message: As of now, the section on Strange Stars does not describe what a strange star is. 
RhinoMind (talk) 23:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done some preliminary work by explaining what quark and strange stars are in the new "Creation" section. The "Strange Star" section still needs to be rewritten. RhinoMind (talk) 04:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe I have cleared up this problem by now. From now on, the article calls for an elaboration on the characteristics of quark stars and strange stars specifically. RhinoMind (talk) 23:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The section on 'Strange stars' 

message: I cut this paragraph from the article:
I think it first and foremost belongs to the article on quark matter and strange quark matter respectively. It can be fitted in here as well, but it would need a solid explanation on how quark stars contribute with nuggets. They would indeed do if they exist in the first place, but it would need an explanation. RhinoMind (talk) 01:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark matter 

message: This section should be deleted. First of all, to requote the Pentaquark page,  there is "overwhelming evidence that the claimed pentaquarks do not exist".
 The idea of 4, 5, and 6 quark hadrons has been discarded by the particle physics community. But this is besides the point, theoretical hadrons have nothing to do with structure of a quark star. It would be more appropriate to reference Quark-gluon plasma. 
Pulu (talk) 05:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Theorized Quark Formations

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Quark star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060313223759/http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviationspace/a6885b4a1db84010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html to http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviationspace/a6885b4a1db84010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20030418110053/http://curious.astro.cornell.edu:80/question.php?number=445 to http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=445
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20030402151744/http://www.wired.com:80/news/technology/0,1282,51943-2,00.html to http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,51943-2,00.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090213124158/http://capca.ucalgary.ca:80/~bniebergal/webPHP/research.php?subdir=strangeQuarkStars to http://www.capca.ucalgary.ca/~bniebergal/webPHP/research.php?subdir=strangeQuarkStars
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Be more analytical about that! It's fundamentally important!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.84.212.42 (talk) 01:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  quark star = electroweak star / black hole = strong force star