lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Province of the Episcopal Church of South Sudan

message: Why has no one removed what I assume is a vexatious notablity flag on this article? I notice that other religion-themed pages have also received this treatment in April 2007 Roman Catholicism in Benin, Baptist Union of Poland, Assemblies of God in New Zealand, Church of Christ in Thailand, etc. 
Could someone more senior than myself do the honours and delete the tag on this article?
Ksimons 20:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Notability"

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Episcopal Church of the Sudan have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate

message: I was undecided to how the Episcopal Church of Sudan should be named. Their official website gives the name as Episcopal Church of Sudan, while the Anglican Communion official website names it as Episcopal Church of the Sudan. I think both forms are in fact correct but I decided to follow the naming of their official website.Mistico (talk) 22:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: I am a member of the Episcopal Diocese of Iowa, which has recently became a Companion Diocese to Nzara.  Nzara isn't the only diocese to become a companion to other Episcopal church USA diocese, so I don't think this section is true and should be reevaluated and removed if it's not true.  Both references in this section are from statements by the ACNA, which has split from the Episcopal church USA, but this hasn't been confirmed by sources in the Episcopal church of the Sudan.nst101 (talk) 00:45, 03 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: They have not cut ties to the Episcopal Church USA

message: I found a source that shows the names of all the Archbishops of the Province, so I am adding their names to the article: .Mistico (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Archbishops of Sudan

message: The number of dioceses of the Province of the Episcopal Church of South Sudan and Sudan has increased from the given number of 31 to 41. The previous number came from the province official website, which has been inactive for a long time, but according to the Anglican Communion official website the current number of dioceses is 41: Mistico (talk) 17:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Dioceses is Outdated
Talk:The Virgin and Child with Saint Anne (Leonardo)

message: *The version on the Louvre website looks NOTHING like this image; I'd suggest we use the unrestored version as the lead, as the current one bears no resemblance to any state of the artwork. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and swapped it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image horribly inaccurate.  

message: In placing the Virgin in the lap of St. Anne, Leonardo was resuscitating a configuration common to iconic Medieval art but that had fallen into disuse in the more naturalistic paintings of the Middle Renaissance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anotherbozo (talk • contribs) 16:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources of Virgin's position in lap of St. Anne 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Leonardo da Vinci - Virgin and Child with St Anne C2RMF retouched.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on . You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2019-01-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 17:20, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image from this article to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Anglican Church of Kenya

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal
Talk:Annunciation (Leonardo)

message: There might be some plagiarism from leonardodavinci.net as the text matches it exactly. Yep. Someone pls check it out. AWwikipedia "Eat more nachos!" (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism??

message: An "Analyse" section was added to the article in mid-December which appears to be the author's theories. In addition, these are poorly written and punctuated, and completely unsupported by any references or sources. I am removing the section, especially since a related article is just now being promoted to the "Did you know" section of the main page. This removal should not be reverted and the material not added back without a major copyedit and the sourcing that is desperately needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic "Analyse" section 
Talk:Directors Guild of America Awards

message: the use of "even" -well that is bias language 167.206.75.157 (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ron Howard "was not even even nominated"
Talk:Coalisland Canal

message: Looking at photos of this canal, I doubt very much that 7 locks raise the canal 250 feet. That would be 33 feet per lock. Derek Andrews (talk) 19:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The 250 ft quoted included the inclined planes, of which there were at least three: Drumreagh, Ballymenagh and Smith's. Note added to article. Bob1960evens (talk) 15:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: I have added a very basic route diagram, but cannot find any local maps to fill in details of bridges, etc. OS Getamap only has 1:250,000, Streetmap doesn't cover N Ireland, Google only has roads and no other features on its map, and the satellite images appear to be from satellites, with no aerial photography layer. Anyone know where I can find maps? Bob1960evens (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Route Diagram
Talk:Richard Cadbury

message: There's no mention of William Adlington Barrow Cadbury on this page, even though it would appear from some sources that William was Richard's son. See e.g. https://www.ancestry.com/genealogy/records/william-adlington-cadbury-24-3g003p and https://wa-cadbury.org.uk/home/ — how about putting in this, on both sides, if the sources are deemed reliable? Simon Grant (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If no objections, I propose to add him to the list of children alongside Beatrice Simon Grant (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Adlington Barrow Cadbury
Talk:Garvagh Madonna

message: I changed the class from stub conservatively to "C" class.  Does the article warrant a higher class?  Thanks!!! --CaroleHenson (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class setting 

message: Not sure why the article was completely reverted to it's stub stage.  Left a message for the user at User talk:Names are hard to think of.  Could this be some kind of spam account???--CaroleHenson (talk) 07:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Update, I heard back, this was just an accident.--CaroleHenson (talk) 07:26, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of the article (Closed)
Talk:Fisher Park Public School

message: no — I believe that schools are notable in their own right as significant public institutions, and obviously, many people agree — see, for example, :Category:Middle schools in Ottawa.  I suspect that someone is trying to promote an agenda here by tagging a lot of schools with deletion tags, even when they've recently passed an AFD.  See Glashan Public School for another example.  I recommend speedy deletion of the AFD tags.  David (talk) 11:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you object to the deletion, then leave a comment at the AfD debate, rather than adding a hangon tag. Hut 8.5 12:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposed to deletion 

message: *  opposed — schools are notable in their own right, as major public institutions that have a lot of employees, affect a lot of people, and cost a lot of money.  They beat out most subway stations on all three counts, and subway stations almost always have their own articles.  Ditto for small country airports. (Note that the original proposer has not added any comment here yet.) David (talk) 22:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Ansidei Madonna

message: Removed stub and unreferenced tabs as I've been working on the article - and set the class conservatively at "C".  What is the appropriate class for this article?  (By the way, I'll still be adding to it if I find more info). --CaroleHenson (talk) 20:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the appropriate class? 
Talk:Brionvega

message: I would like to add a photograph of the Filodiffusore Brionvega FD1102. If one can be located or uploaded to Commons, please let me know. (There is already a shot of the  in the "Gallery".) Thank you, Cl3phact0 (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filodiffusore Brionvega FD1102? 

message: I have read several claims that the Brionvega Doney 14 (1962) was the first portable transistor television made in Europe (see this and this). Further corroboration would be appreciated. Thank you, Cl3phact0 (talk) 18:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doney 14 television 

message: Would be helpful to have more description of the product designs and why they were innovative. At the moment, we have lists of architects and designers, lists of products, lists of awards, but not much in the way of description of the actual designs themselves. (The gallery definitely helps and is lovely but it feels like it needs to be described in prose as well.) Cielquiparle (talk) 21:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, . There are astoundingly detailed descriptions and historical/critical  about these objects embedded in the metadata of the photographs (at lease those from the National Museum of Science and Technology). It's all in Italian, but I'd be happy to translate and re-word the information in order to add more descriptive language and context—if this metadata is considered WP:RS. I've not found anything specific concerning the use of this type of information, or whether its presence on Commons and the fact that it's from a national museum (and presumably obviously written by an expert in the field) qualifies it as "published" or "reliable". (This is why I've mostly confined its use to the "Notes", although, for what it's worth, I've see considerably less "solid" information used elsewhere in this encyclopaedia.) Appreciate your thoughts. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More description
Talk:George Cadbury

message: I believe George Cadbury was married twice with eleven children.  Details?  Cusop Dingle (talk) 17:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: Hello all,
In this section, there is talk of a normandy hospital, does anyone have the source for this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdcoho9 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't been able to find any evidence for such a hospital. Looking through the article history it looks like an old piece of vandalsim that nobody noticed before. I'll remove it. DuncanHill (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philanthropy 

message: The current revision  says "At sixteen, he was apprenticed to Joseph Rowntree, in York, to learn the grocery trade."
I wanted to wikilink Joseph Rowntree, but then the question arises as whether it was Rowntree senior, or his son: Joseph_Rowntree.
The sentence seems to have been copied from https://www.quakersintheworld.org/quakers-in-action/270/George-Cadbury which links to Rowntree junior.
However, this page: https://www.rowntreesociety.org.uk/explore-rowntree-history/rowntree-a-z/cadbury-fry-rowntree/ says "At 28 Pavement, the grocery business run by Joseph Rowntree (Senior), George Cadbury came to train in 1857. The records state that George worked specifically under Joseph Rowntree in the 1850s, and that most likely he served not as an apprentice but as an assistant."
This raises several questions. It seems to suggest that Cadbury was trained by Rowntree senior, but doesn't actually say so. Maybe father and son were both there, and Cadbury was trained by Rowntree junior. Also, in 1857 Cadbury would have been 17 or 18 (assuming the stated birth date of 1839 is correct), not 16. Finally, was Cadbury an apprentice or an assistant?
More research needed.
Isidore (talk) 10:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:Villano V

message: Changes at this article were made as the word "Villaño" is wrong and hasn't meaning in Spanish or any of both languages (English nor Spanish). The right word should be "Villano", which means "Villain" in Spanish; and is the sense implied when using this word, referencing any of that wrestlers (A "villain" suppose to be a "scoundrel or criminal", as defines the Merrian-Webster Dictionary at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/villain; it is compared with the definition for "Villano" made by the Diccionario de la Real Academia Española de la Lengua at http://buscon.rae.es/draeI/SrvltConsulta?TIPO_BUS=3&LEMA=villano). 
Sources that verifies what's the right word: 
- The ESTO journal, at http://www.oem.com.mx/esto/notas/n296679.htm (Spanish), using the word 'Villano' at this next text: ""Para nosotros (Los Villanos III, IV y V) es un gran placer regresar a esta arena de grandes triunfos, pero también de grandes derrotas, pues aquí perdí mi incógnita [For us, (The Villains III, IV and V) its a great pleasure come back to this Arena of great victories, but also of great losts, as here I lost my mask]" . 
- Spanish Wikipedia, article Villano III
- SuperLuchas.net, mexican specialized webzine, at the article Ray Mendoza Jr. (Villano V) se encuentra en el hospital luego de la función de este domingo
As suggested by the Wikipedia's Team, I start this thread for to begin the discussion about to rename the article, as performing that spelling corrections implies redefining how the content is known by any user interested onto following this information; also, it implies several changes at certain related content (Villaño I, Villaño II, Villaño III, Villaño IV, Template:Villaños, and any Wikipedia's known content linking to this article), regard both the name for the articles and the same spelling usage (Done). 
DJ Enyix (talk) 09:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling change made to this article from "Villaño" to "Villano"  - 02/21/2011 
Talk:Madonna and Child with the Book

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 15:37, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:River Finn (Foyle tributary)

message: Whilst checking this river's entry on my mobile phone I was puzzled to see it referred to as 'River in the United Kingdom' in its sub-heading. This seems at the very least misleading for a river predominantly in the Republic of Ireland and entirely within the island of Ireland. Can this be amended? Aerach (talk) 11:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile phone sub-heading
Talk:Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints (Raphael)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   — CactusWriter | needles 04:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Madonna del Cardellino

message: How certain are we of the year? In a televised interview, the Uffizi director said the earthquake took place in 1547.  Roger Pilgham (talk) 08:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1548 earthquake?

message: The book which Mary holds identifies her as Sedes Sapientiae, usually translated as "Seat of Wisdom". Sedes literally means "seat", in the old sense of a residence (cf. "family seat"), so it seems to me to make more sense to translate it as "Abode".  Stanning 21:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sedes sapientiae 

message: Should be on the artist's page. 
Blackdiamand (talk) 18:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Painter Info?

message: it looks to me as if the whole text is lifted from http://uffizigallery.com/artwork/ (unless, of course, it's the other way around). I don't know how to find out which it is, but wanted to flag this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.3.114.121 (talk) 16:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible plagiarism 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Raffaello Sanzio - Madonna del Cardellino - Google Art Project.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 18, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-06-18. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Raffaello Sanzio - Madonna del Cardellino - Google Art Project.jpg scheduled for POTD
Talk:The Mad Monk

message: I'm not terribly interested in starting a new Wiki page because I have next to no information about it, but I do know that The Mad Monk was a bar in Wilmington, NC long before this movie was ever made. In fact, it burned down before this movie was ever made. Probably not what you'd call a famous landmark in the scope of world affairs, but Foghat played there once. Probably others - but I don't remember. Mikerrr (talk) 15:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation Needed
Talk:Madonna dell'Impannata

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   — CactusWriter | needles 04:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Madonna della Seggiola

message: — Assignment last updated by Rmmiller364 (talk) 00:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Renaissance Art
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Notability/Articles for Notability Review

message: What is this page for, who made it, why and where was the discussion for it? Futhermore, what is the consequence of a discussion on these pages and how is this necessary given that we can do this at AfD? JoshuaZ 22:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded.  I don't think AfNR is necessary.  Per WP:BOLD, which is itself cited on the AfNR page, someone coming across a -tagged article should do the investigation him/herself to determine whether the topic is notable, if it is expand the article, if it's not merge, prod, or AfD it.  Looks like AfNR is an unnecessary extra layer of discussion when we've already got AfD and individual articles' talk pages.  Pan Dan 20:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um what?