lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:TVN (Polish TV channel)

message: I dont speak Englisch. This is Polisch:
Ramówka podana w waszym artykule jest kompletnie zmyślona i nieprawdziwa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.6.18.60 (talk • contribs) 09:53, 20 November 2010
:Hi. You can always use Google Translate, at http://translate.google.com/# It's not perfect, but it's better than nothing. Using that, I translate your words as "Schedule, which stated in your article is completely bogus and untrue." Can you provide a reliable source for a correct schedule? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Section

message: second from top template is named in polish Grupa ITI, where it should be ITI Group, please correct Vercynogetorix (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  template 

message: I believe that this TV station deserves a section listing some of its main affairs. There are numerous controversies widely covered in Poland by other media outlets.
To name a couple:
:TVN staged Hitlers birthday party in the forest just to make a material about it and blame it on populist and nationalist government.
:TVN reporters staged the scene outside of Police Station where they dumped lots of empty alcohol bottles into the bins belonging to police just to slander them and make a controversial material. They were caught red-handed on camera.
Those are just two examples but there are other cases. Over the next couple of weeks I'll be collecting the material and sources for this section. WalterMccan (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section - Controversies
Talk:Mount Le Conte (California)

message: Peakbagger and LoJ agree that the line parent is Mount Muir although Muir might not be considered and independent peak because it has a clean prominence of 298 feet. LoJ gives Muir's mean prominence as 331 feet. A prior version of this article gave Mount Langley as the line parent. LoJ says Langley is Le Conte's proximate parent (nearest higher neighbor) and Peakbagger agrees. I don't think any of this belongs in the article. –droll [chat] 02:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parent peak
Talk:The Bird Is Gone

message: The plot summary in this article is a word-for-word copy from Booklist review of the book. I'm removing it. --Olegkagan (talk) 20:52, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary
Talk:Mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalopathy syndrome

message: Purportedly this is a very rare disease - only 70 cases worldwide have been diagnosed to date.
We'll have to scour a bit more to find more references, though those may be hard to come by at the moment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.219.56.130 (talk) 16:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Judgement

message: Someone removed the mentioning of alternative spelling, which I've reinstated. This word is incidentally discussed in Wikipedia's Manual of style.
This page should be titled "Judgment" without the "e" - considering that in American English the other way is incorrect.
According to https://www.dictionary.com/e/judgement-vs-judgment/ "judgment" has been the spelling on both sides of the pond from the late 1600s all the way to when Webster put it in his dictionary in 1828.  'Judgment' with the added 'e' is modern spelling used in certain regions, but it is in no way standard English. 165.255.241.15 (talk) 12:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling variations 

message: Perhaps there should be an entry about the philosophical concept of judgement of history, which often appears in modern political rhetoric. It seems to have replaced the more ancient notion of divine judgement, and therefore could give the impression that contemporary secular people are trying to play God through the paradigm of history. There does appear to be a certain ovidian paganization of history in this type of rhetoric. ADM (talk) 19:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Judgement of history

message: 'Judgment' as in condemnation or a determination by any authority is spelled without the 'e'. 'Judgement' as in any other opinion, estimate or discernment is spelled with an 'e'. This according to at least the 1965 edition of Fowler's Modern Use of the English Language. This useful distinction will be lost if we spell this word in either sense indiscriminately.
Fynepointe (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling Distinction 

message: :It appears there could be a link to another wikipedia page under uses of the word. i.e. adjudicational capabilitiesMiss.marinagriffin (talk) 17:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  References missing 

message: Some other pages that could be listed under "See Also" could be the wikipedia pages on reason and logicMiss.marinagriffin (talk) 17:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions to "See Also" 

message: If no one objects, I am going to clean up and fill out this article a little more over the next couple weeks, especially with some more sourcing and for usages other than Aristotelian logic. Feel free to undo any changes I make that don't seem an improvement. HelmholtzButLater (talk) 01:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates
Talk:Wilbur (TV series)

message: The show "premiered on Ready Set Learn on Discovery Kids on April 16, 2007 and then moved to TLC on April 23, 2007.".
How do we know this is true? The sources cited spell it out:
This source] says
"Premiere date: April 16, 2007...Network: Discovery Family Channel"
This one clarifies "a new Discovery Kids preschool series set to debut on April 16 at 11 a.m. during the channel’s Ready Set Learn! block. The show will then air at 7:30 a.m. on TLC beginning April 23." - SummerPhDv2.0 03:19, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The editor in question removed the cites confirming the information they repeatedly disputed. They have now been range-blocked from editing. Should they return, they will need to discuss issues on article talk pages or they will be blocked again. - SummerPhDv2.0 16:47, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premier
Talk:Abdominoperineal resection

message: Section 'Relation to low anterior resection (LAR)' states that APR gives, in general, a worse quality of life than LAR, but gives no justification for this claim. Reasons are needed, as this is not obvious and may not even be true. Also not mentioned is that many LAR patients have a temporary or permanent Ileostomy resulting in the use of a pouch, similar to an APR Ostomy pouch. David Spector (talk) 12:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "a worse quality of life" than LAR? 
Talk:Trimotor

message: §List of trimotors includes: * Ryan Navion one off modification (US, 1961) 
Our article Ryan Navion only discusses the single engine version, but this and this suggest that such an animal existed (though the latter says that it was manufactured in 1955 and converted to a tri-motor Hallair 510 in 1963).  If we can find an WP:RS we should add a reference to this entry. -- ToE 21:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ryan Navion
Talk:Rose Quarter

message: Almost B class, need to expand the summaries where other articles are the "see main" as well as some copyediting for punctuation, citations go immediatly after the period/comma/exclamation point. Aboutmovies 19:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now B. For GA, I'd expand the Facilities intro, the single sentence looks lonely, plus an infobox (generic if nothing specific), expand the summares for the two arenas to include seating changes (i.e. current is for basketball, include hockey/lacross) and construction cost, plus maybe "public plazas" for the outdoor items (fountain, sculptures). Great job on this and Rose Garden. Aboutmovies 00:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Dave Smith (American football coach)

message: There is a second Dave Smith (football player), I moved the Houston Oilers templates to his page.  The bios don't seem to match but they could be the same person Tassedethe (talk) 06:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Dave Smith 
Talk:Repatriation flight program

message: this is completely unsourced!... that is all. 216.234.58.18 18:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ok i added 1 source. 216.234.58.18 18:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: completely unsourced

message: Not enough sources Motlatlaneo (talk) 02:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sourced
Talk:Wasted (Carrie Underwood song)

message: The correct single artwork is this: http://i697.photobucket.com/albums/vv340/carrieubr/Carrie%20Underwood%20Singles/Wasted_Original.jpg The "cover" that is on there now is just a cropped version of the song book. If you need proof, click this link: http://i49.tinypic.com/23kpwyq.jpg -Kelan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.214.151 (talk) 01:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong single artwork
Talk:Craniotome (tool)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Article restored. Article namespace pages should not be redirected to draft namespace pages, even if some content was merged to the draft. Once the draft becomes published, the possibility of redirecting this page to the other can be explored then. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 01:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Craniotome (tool) → ? – This is a redirect from mainspace to a different namespace, which is not allowed per WP:R2. However, the history of the redirect needs to be kept to satisfy the attribution requirement because some information was copied to Draft:Cranial Drill, so the redirect needs to be moved somewhere else (without leaving a redirect). Alternatively, the edit which turned the page into a redirect could maybe be reverted. Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 November 2018
Talk:Craniotomy

message: What is the success rate, average 2601:549:4302:5BC0:4458:9E12:91A5:B5A5 (talk) 01:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Success
Talk:Gastrointestinal perforation

message: From the history this page has been extensively vandalised, and not always fixed correctly. Rich Farmbrough, 02:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs cleanup

message: The chronic use of opioids is common - it was cited and was removed without meaningful explanation - please replace this - talked with the editor  - no response. BeingObjective (talk) 14:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies, I had missed your recent edit when I made my changes. Added back! Jpola3399 (talk) 14:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks - really appreciated. BeingObjective (talk) 14:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noted the chronic opioid use section removed - no dialog. 

message: This needs to be reverted - as written, this article includes disease states as trauma - the prior version was far better. BeingObjective (talk) 14:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanisms of injury
Talk:Twinjet

message: There should be many more twin-jet airliners like CRJ, or ERJ, or TU, etc  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jianqing01 (talk • contribs) 10:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete List 

message: I am sure that if you wanted to do some research, you would find some twin-jet airliners produced by the Tupolev aviation bureau, probably by the hundreds, and there was definitely the French-made Caravelle airliner that was made back in the 1950s and 60s - the pioneer in the idea of short-haul, medium-sized jet airliners (much smaller than a Boeing 707, a DC-8, or a DeHavilland Comet. Otherwise, if you want to eliminate the historical relics, then eliminate the BAC-111.
98.67.107.6 (talk) 07:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Take a Look 

message: Somebody who really knows the subject needs to edit the article, especially the Efficiency section, for English syntax. It really does not sound like standard English, and I do not understand the exact intended meaning. Mamarazzi (talk) 15:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  English syntax 

message: In the paragraph 'Introduction to transoceanic flights', there is a link to the page Great Circle Route which is a false redirect to a different subject.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Great_Circle_Route&redirect=no
If the term is real, I think the redirect should be removed and the page should be created or rewritten.71.214.125.228 (talk) 22:21, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Circle Route 

message: Unless there are some additional attributes, I think twin-jet is a distinction without merit. It means so little it's a waste of time to even legitimize the term. 
* Do the engines need to be in any particular configuration or orientation?
* Do they need to be of the same physical size?
* Do they need to have the same thrust/power? 
* Do they need to be identical engines?
* by the same mfg?
* If my mono-jet uses a JATO rocket for take-off, is it a twin-jet?
* Can the engines be scram-jet? Any kind of jet? Air-breathing?
--Solidpoint (talk) 21:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The significance is in the history, which the article covers. - BilCat (talk) 21:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are the qualifying distinctions that define a "twin-jet"? 

message: Was the stacked twin-engine design of this British interceptor jet fighter literally unique ? 120.17.191.83 (talk) 05:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Electric Lightning
Talk:Hepatoportoenterostomy

message: In my opinion, the prognosis of this article is not trivia. I would like to suggest removing the trivia tag. Ged3000 20:58, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia Tag

message: This procedure can be carried out on any person whose communication between their bile ducts and small intestine is not patent, for example after complications in gall bladder removal resulting in the severing of the bile duct. Ged3000 (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not exclusively paediatric
Talk:Glodwick

message: There's an image at geograph of the Glodwick Lows (here). --Jza84 |  Talk   22:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Glodwick lows
Talk:Scott Klace

message: He's certainly a solid working actor, but I'm not sure that he meets Wikipedia's standard for notability for entertainers.
These are:
# Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.
# Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
# Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
"Significant" is a judgement call, but most of his credits seem to be guest spots and bit parts. At a glance, the best argument for notability might be his repeated appearances in unique roles on King of the Hill. 
I added a "find sources" template to the talk page here, but so far, I don't see much that would count as reliable sources. --GentlemanGhost (converse) 22:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Mini sleeve gastrectomy

message: There really is no such thing as "mini" sleeve gastrectomy. There is already a page on sleeve gastrectomy that repeats most of the inform here. I think this page should be deleted/merged with that one.
````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MacMadame (talk • contribs) 05:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: There
Talk:Mother's Day (1980 film)

message: I added a cleanup tag. The article needs a significant amount of copyediting. Rray (talk) 11:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag

message: I don't know how to add it to the article but here it is:  http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19801201/REVIEWS/12010301/1023.  I don't know why someone put a citation needed tag--it would have taken all of 30 seconds to verify.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.244.77.26 (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for Ebert quote
Talk:St. Stephen's Basilica

message: The article needs information regarding the founding of the church, earlier structures, when it became a cathedral and construction of the current building.Goldnpuppy (talk) 21:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this article really could use more information! Further info should be added about both the Black Madonna Chapel and the Chapel of the Holy Right Hand. I think info can be found here.Geb0541 (talk) 21:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Material
Talk:Choco Taco

message: Someone mentioned this article on the Village Pump as an example of a short article that is complete, so therefore an example of the failure of Assessment. Here are some areas that really need expansion before calling it complete, copied from there, so as not to be lost: How does it sell? Why is the ice cream low fat? What are related products? Competitors? What has been the critical or commercial reaction to it? Is it a major product of its original company? Of its huge conglomerate? What does "Choco Tacos have been sold at some Taco Bell restaurants" mean - when? why? how many? What about the Taco Bell restaurants that don't sell them - why? Are there different flavors than vanilla with peanuts? Why or why not? They're sold in Italy - famed for Gelato, to such an extent that complete garbage that has never seen an Italian gets called "italian style" - so how do they sell there? What was the reaction to the introduction? Are they sold in other places besides the US and Italy? Why or why not? Many of the references are bare links, they really should have publication dates, author names, and titles. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: what is the typical price these sell for?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.193.112.62 (talk) 01:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a source that said a Choco Taco cost about $2.49, but given that your post was over 10 years ago, the adjustment for inflation would have been about $1.85 around the time of your post. Once the item became discontinued, I also discovered there were several reliable sources showing auction listings of a box of about 20 at a price of around $200 for the box. Adam MLIS (talk) 01:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  how much do they cost?? 

message: There is no information at the linked page to indicate that the statement has any basis in fact.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.88.11.131 (talk) 17:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation of Rayburn Cafeteria 

message: As noted by an anonymous Wikipedia editor here, "Sam Rayburn died in 1961; Choco Taco was introduced in the 80s." The press stores in The Atlantic and Yahoo News did not pick up on this aspect of the story. -- GreenC 19:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Samuel Rayburn]] and Choco Taco 

message: https://www.foxbusiness.com/fox-news-food-drink/choco-tacos-returning-summer-after-partnership-between-taco-bell-salt-straw.amp Ampskillz (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaco taco is coming back 2024
Talk:Tracheoesophageal fistula

message: A tracheo-esophageal puncture can be created deliberately by surgery to allow the insertion of a voice prosthesis after a total larygectomy. Is this a fistula which should therefore be refereenced in this article? JDE94.126.214.38 (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracheo-esophageal puncture
Talk:Immaculate Conception Seminary School of Theology

message: Some mention should probably be made of the era where this school was separated from the main campus in South Orange and set up on its own, almost monastery-like campus in Mahwah, New Jersey. I would add such, but the most I know is where the former Mahwah campus is located and that the old chapel is now used to host events like weddings.oknazevad (talk) 03:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahwah era
Talk:Cerise (satellite)

message: There is a sketch of this event in Wikipedia Commons at commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cerise_sat_broke.jpg  (I don't know how to do it). GraL (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the image. I just added  --Ysangkok (talk) 22:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration 

message: Was the sattelite decomissioned after the collision? Did it crash? --139.174.58.193 (talk) 12:34, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  And now? / Status today?
Talk:Barbara Stanwyck on stage, screen, radio and television

message: this list has now gone beyond "filmography", as it includes television.  As I'm researching through her professional career, I find that she has also appeared on radio, at least with Jack Benny, and also on the Broadway stage.  In fact, she was acting on stage before she ever acted in a movie.  I suggest moving this list to something more appropriate.  Looking at some of the Featured Lists, it seems it might work as:
Barbara Stanwyck on stage, screen, radio and television
Thoughts? — Maile  (talk) 15:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to move page
Talk:10/90 gap

message: As well as those listed at the AfD I have found the following that could be used to improve the article:
*http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/archives/2002/10/31/0000177790
*http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90782/90880/6293965.html
*http://www.tballiance.org/newscenter/view-brief.php?id=85
*Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty, The Lancet, Volume 361, Issue 9359, Pages 712-713, R.Horton. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673603126657
:*And no doubt others. Bigger digger (talk) 23:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *Always good to get a NYT mention: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/17/magazine/17charity.t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin Bigger digger (talk) 23:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 

message: The example given in the intro paragraph doesnt make sense. Why would you need to commit resources to medical research for illnesses which are preventable?  If they are preventable then solutions have already been researched. The issue then is one of implementation and not one of where medical research is devoted. Honestly it sounds more like liberal marxist anti-establishment propaganda than it does a rational statement.  50.34.41.50 (talk) 00:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  elaboration needed