lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Titanium in Africa

message: As the original author of this article, "Titanium in Africa", I suggest that an article Titanium world market, similar to this article but covering the entire titanium production instead of just Africa, be written before merger.  I would have written this article already but I don't have the time presently.--McTrixie/Mr Accountable 00:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger
Talk:Titanic Brewery

message: The article lede is very misleading - it implies all Titanic beers are pale and hoppy. While they do produce beers with this character, they produce many successful darker, maltier, sweeter beers. Their most popular beer beyond their own pubs is probably Plum Porter, a beer that is anything but pale. Even within Titanic's own pubs, where a full range of Titanic beers are available, dark beers such as Plum Porter and Stout sell very well. --Ef80 (talk) 19:48, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede
Talk:Tine (company)

message: :Image:7394.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:7394.jpg

message: Hanne Refsholt has not been ceo since 2018, mate. 188.113.95.213 (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mate
Talk:Timothy Taylor Brewery

message: Someone add that Landlord is Madonna's favourite drink :http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/features/the-ten-best-bottled-british-ales-415807.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.74.29 (talk) 06:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Is barrel brew sold in works poob only? Nay seen it in oother poob.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.89.71 (talk) 06:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eh By Gum
Talk:Timothy's World Coffee

message: I noticed the article needs sources, but I do not know how to add them. Here's some sources that could be added to cite most of information that exists in this article.
Management Information: 
https://www.timothys.ca/content/aboutUsPresident.asp
Expansion to South Korea with plans of 50 more: 
http://www.timothys.com/about-news-details.php?id=32
Significant Milestones, Including the fact about it being a business venture in University: 
https://www.timothys.ca/content/Franchise_Kit.pdf
64.230.4.2 (talk) 21:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems to me that the section about "Current business" should come after the section about the Bruegger's acquisition, not before it -- assuming, at least, that I read the earlier sections of the article correctly, viz., that Timothy's bought back the retail business from Bruegger's. If my assumption is correct, can someone better-versed in editing than I fix this? Thanks.71.105.208.69 (talk) 14:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordering of sections
Talk:Times Publishing Company

message: The website for this entity is without a doubt the most politically biased "publication" I have ever seen. I would be very interested to know what kind of funding they are receiving from the Obama campaign and/or the DNC. Especially as this is the primary source of rebuttal on President Obamas new "attackwatch.com" website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.24.112 (talk) 01:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:United Nations resolutions on Abkhazia

message: The last five resolution links don't work. Alaexis 12:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: UN seems to have blocked access to their document site for the most recent resolutions only. I'll see if I can find a way round. Please leave as is at the moment because the links can still be used via the internet archive. AndrewRT(Talk) 18:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tijuana Flats

message: Seeing if I can track down this source before renominating. CorporateM (Talk) 21:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Nomination 

message: Hi Corporate, I would agree with the reviewer that the article has a cheery sort of upbeat tone that is more indicative of a magazine article then the dispassionate style WP likes. The back story is personalize more than it needs to be and uses the names of what appear to be non-notable people (see WP:PRIVACY).  The problem is if I/we fixed those things by summarizing and removing personal details it would be even shorter than it is now.  So the solution is to expand the article and to my surprise there are dozens more sources you haven't found yet. For example see here:   I also get dozens of hits on High Beam.
which you can apply for here.  Once you get going with more sources and 'fatten up' the article, I can help you to edit it so that it reads well and with a dispassionate tone. Its a great article so keep me posted on your progress and let me know how I can help. -- — Keithbob • Talk •  18:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I have a Highbeam account. I've only found droves of articles announcing the opening of specific locations. Can you share the sources you found? The NewsBank link is broken. CorporateM (Talk) 18:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Feedback
Talk:Tiger Management

message: The fund have bought a part of russian (local major) internet search company Yandex.
Prooflink
--jno (talk) 11:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Activity 

message: Involving this fund. FYI. Ikip  17:59, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co., Weiss, and Shepard]]

message: Discussion at Talk:Robertson_v._McGraw-Hill_Co.#merge_to_Tiger_Management. THF (talk) 13:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I think we need to rethink the Robinson lawsuit-merger...it was not a straight consensus, and there were a lot of socks around. I would like to undo it. Thoughts? Huldra (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 1. It's Robertson, not "Robinson." 2. What are are you talking about? CampBaker (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

text: No. Policy favors the merger. Cool Hand Luke 04:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Tidewater Oil Company

message: I am interested in this article because my grandfather and his oldest brother worked for Tidewater in Bayonne, before moving to California in 1920 to work at Associated Oil's Avon refinery (near Concord in the Bay Area) in 1920.
I am confused by this seeming non sequitur in the text: 
"In 1928, Pacific Western Oil Corporation incorporated as a holding company for Edward L. Doheny and family which subsequently came under the control of J. Paul Getty." 
 
What relation was there between Pacific Western and Tidewater Associated?  I remember from conversations with my grandfather that J. Paul Getty was involved with Tidewater Associated, but I am not sure how. 
Mhrogers (talk) 00:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the sentence quoted above seems irrelevant so I have removed it from the article.  Please replace it, if you can make it relevant. Biscuittin (talk) 09:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added a section on Tidewater Petroleum Cooperative.  If this is seen as irrelevant then I do not object to it being deleted. Biscuittin (talk) 14:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted it myself because I think it is probably irrelevant. Biscuittin (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidewater Petroleum Cooperative 

message: A New York Times article from April 19, 1951, stating that Getty had acquired a controlling interest in Tide Water. - Seasider53 (talk) 03:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getty 

message: AFAIK Tidewater ended as a holding company where each share of Tidewater (quietly) represented two shares of Getty Oil. I can't recall if Tidewater shareholders could surrender their shares for Getty shares, but Tidewater didn't go out of its way to advertise it. IIRC the shares were thinly traded and often priced not far above the Getty share price, i.e. far below their underlying value, which ensured that shares that appeared on the exchange tended to be purchased for Getty who didn't sell which only contributed to the thin trading and peculiar share price. They eventually did dissolve and distribute Getty shares, but I thought that was in 1976 when Getty died, not 1966. PolychromePlatypus (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidewater ended as a holding company
Talk:Ticonderoga Publications

message: I deleted the notability tag on this-- if nothing else, their awards record makes them unambiguously notable.  I do agree with the other tags here- this article definitely could use  fleshing out and some additional references. (I think it's hard to find some of the Australian SF sources over on the other side of the big pond) NumberC35 (talk) 03:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notabilty 
Talk:Company man

message: Most Drilling Foremen (Company Men) in today’s oil industry do not have Engineering background, most come up through the ranks on the contractor or vender side of the industry. Major and independent operators have swung more to keeping Operations, Engineering & Geology separate units of a projects drilling team. This article also puts entirely too much enfaces on mud loggers. In today’s oil field the mud logger has just about been phased out due to the increasing technology of down hole tools.
Possible useful link: http://1-oil-job.com/company-man-job.html  Manning (talk) 12:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oil industry terminology
Talk:Thule Group

message: Being employed by Thule Group, I made some totally objective changes to the company article, like 2015 financials instead of 2013, recent acquisitions and divestments and providing links to Thule Group brand web sites. If my edits are considered inappropriate, please roll back, and I can suggest them on the talk page instead.  Tobbelobbe (talk) 11:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Self edit with CoI
Talk:Patricia Field

message: The article is under the category LGBT but the corpus of the text doesn't mention anything relevant nor justify it. Shouldn't the categories also have their sources? 91.132.141.80 (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For many years she was romantically committed to costume designer Rebecca Weinberg (Field)[2], with whom she has partnered on Sex & the City and Spin City. This would seem to justify the tag.  -- Banjeboi 11:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT??
Talk:Gyne

message: i want more word of gyne as prefix —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.215.73 (talk • contribs) 
:I'm assuming you're looking for a list of articles starting with gyn-. Or try the same on Wiktionary. —Pengo 12:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prefix 

message: The clearest of TRUST... Almoqit (talk) 04:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wait for 8:55 AM on 🐝🔞💹®
Talk:Threshold Entertainment

message: Some citation would be nice, as I don't trust Threshold's own website, since they're a bit goofy at the management level. Coffee5binky (talk) 12:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 

message: There is a part that explains the "most prominent example of the success of this Intellectual Property Management model." Does this refer to the legal concept of intellectual property or is it something else, like an organization? -- Tumthe3 (talk) 05:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Misuse of Caps
Talk:Thorn EMI

message: Another brand associated with Thorn EMI that may be missed in this article is Bendix. This company had made some washing machine, especilly front-loading automatics for the UK and Australian markets especially through the 1970s to the early 1990s. The nameplate on some of these machines had the Thorn EMI logo as part of the Bendix logo and documentation often made references to Thorn EMI for customer support. SimonMackay (talk) 13:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bendix washing-machines

message: Until around 1985 Thorn-EMI grouped its businesses into 8 major operating divisions. About this time it sold the cinemas, the film making business, and Ferguson. It also divested itself of the many small companies which made up the Metal Industries division. Thereafter I think it had 4 strategic business units, roughly Technology, Retail, Lighting & Music. Details of these will be found in old company reports and newspaper articles of the period (the Financial Times probably provides good coverage). Using the actual structure that the company itself used would help place the wide range of business units in a better context, especially as their significance changed a lot over time. Semudobia (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business Divisions 
Talk:Thorn Electrical Industries

message: According to the linked article, Thorn Lighting still exists as part of another company. However, this article seems to suggest that Thorn Lighting is the basis of Thorn of the 1980s, which would suggest that it was part of... what exactly? I'm confused when Lighting went its own way, and what the resulting company was. It seems this happened after the EMI de-merge, but it's not mentioned specifically. Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused...
Talk:Filamer Christian College

message: Many thanks to those who contributed their time in expanding this article.
However, I noticed excessive links and off-topic sections added which affects Wikipedia's quality standards.  Fddfred  talk  08:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive Links
Talk:Thomastik-Infeld

message: The bit about Dominants being a standard for comparison (or known starting place when searching for the best strings for an individual violin) comes from a commment Michael Darnton made on Maestronet regarding his time at Bein and Fushi, saying that if a violin needed other strings than mittel Dominants to work well, it would go back into the workroom to find out why and fix it. __Just plain Bill 13:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominant strings 

message: Hey all, I think it would be nice to create a new section for the products T-I offers. Would be nice to add some more information on the other product types they offer, like the "Orchestral" and "Folk" products. (It would also be nice if the history section got a little touch-up, just sayin'.)  RiTenuto (talk) 05:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Products
Talk:Technify Motors

message: I removed any information about the Centurion 3.2 engine from the article. This engine does not even exist as prototype yet. Also it seems somehow doubtful that Thielert survives the next couple of months/years. The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) and the public prosecutor's office is investigating against Thielert because of inconsistencies in theit financial reports. Braeutigam 11:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The engines will survive even if the company does not:  Regulation demands that spares be kept available.  And Diamond Aircraft are still selling well.  Regardless:  The major part of Thielert's business may be Centurion Engines, but there is already an article for that, and that is where information about the engines should be.  Paul Beardsell 09:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Centurion 3.2 does not exist yet
Talk:THF Realty

message: The flags at Chestefield Valley are tattered and raggedy plus they are at half staff-why? Flags must be replaced/it is disrespectful. 2600:1702:4610:1EE0:A896:6FD4:64B6:2DDE (talk) 23:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  American flags displayed Chesterfield Valkey
Talk:Steamship Authority

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Participants found that the word "The" was not consistently treated by sources as part of the organization's name. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Steamship Authority →  – I would like to discuss whether WP:THE applies to this article. I'm not entirely sure whether it does it not, and I was hoping we could discuss whether it does or not. Interstellarity (talk) 20:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 August 2023 

message: The redirect Nantucket ferry has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Interstellarity (talk) 01:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Nantucket ferry]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Sleep Train

message: See Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Sleep_Country_USA.  Jytdog (talk) 01:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: this article was written under a likely COI
Talk:Shore Porters Society

message: Seriously, one of the world's oldest companies. 510 years old, and there's two sentences on Wikiality. This is conclusive proof of how useless Wikiality actually is. There's endless pages of crap on fictional cult characters, and something that's real-world and ancient has two sentences. Or has some nazi-admin cabal protected this page so no-one can write on it? (AGAIN)
Anyone who trusts anything ever written on Wikipedia is a total fool.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.227.84 (talk) 23:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not protected.  Its own version of history is better than anyone so far got round researching and writing for Wikipedia (probably a reflection on the priorities of internet users): you are welcome to try.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: LAME!!!
Talk:The Sagamore

message: This article is a direct copy of a page from the Sagamore's website.  See http://www.thesagamore.com/resort/history.php
The hotel is a historic and interesting place, and deserves an entry.  But at the moment it is not only blatant advertising, it poses a serious copyright problem. Roregan (talk) 19:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Race and intelligence (history)

message: :Indians  were seen as a homogeneous group of savages despite the fact that individual groups varied extensively and had several well developed social systems. Black people were also portrayed as savage, uncivilized and having low intelligence. By creating these social constructs, expansion into North America was justified.
Was it only on the basis of their being "savage" that this expansion was justified? And doesn't this mean that slavery of blacks had the same justification? --Uncle Ed 12:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Intro implies that R&I is nothing but a justification of mistreatment - which I largely agree with, but it should be written neutrally.
Later, it mixes up racial stereotpying with the astonishing discovery that in the racist US South, the dumb whites weren't even as smart as northern Blacks. 
Perhaps the best way to write the article is simply to list the conceptions held by various advocates at various times. And for those who explained their reasoning, some quotes and/or summaries.
I'm particularly interested in people who announced discoveries which contradicted the pre-WW2 consensus that "blacks are born stupid" (BABS) - as this seems to be the most pernicious or at least contentious idea of them all. Two writers are mentioned in the intro as accusing even modern researchers of such racism, and The Bell Curve is often portrayed as supporting BABS. 
If there's a dispute about "what views does TBC advocate", then we need a section on that dispute. Like:
*(C) calls TBC racist, on the grounds that it advocates BABS
*(D) denies that the book advocates BABS
All right, that's all the analysis and commentary I have time for today. I hope someone can fix this up. --Uncle Ed 12:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article flow 

message: In 1961, the psychologist Henry Garrett would coined the term equalitarian dogma to describe the then politically fashionable view that there were no race differences in intelligence, or if there were, they were purely the result of environmental factors. Those who questioned these views often put their careers at risk.Lynn 2001 pp. 67–69
Don't know if this was all that historically notable. Did anyone else use this term? It's not like it became a household word. In any case in makes no sense for the introduction to the section on "modern work" futurebird 15:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah ha. Thanks. futurebird 13:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On that topic, I have reverted this edit as it seems to me that it places the views of Garrett and Shockley at the forefront of the debate when really they were widely perceived as fringe extremists. Pascal.Tesson 20:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Garrett and Shockley were at the forefront of the public debate about segregation. Their views were included to a pamphlet Race and Reason which was mandatory reading in Southern schools. I will try to integrate their views to the article better.MoritzB 20:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equalitarian dogma
Talk:Cambia Health Solutions

message: The Tacoma office section appears to have been vandalized.  Unsure why the bots didn’t catch this, but I plan to remove as this is inappropriate language.--Neyoung (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I tried to correct the "income" section of the info box from "net income" to "gross income," a difference of about 90 pct. I changed it to "gross premium" but now it doesn't show up on the page, except in edit mode. I will continue to try to fix this, but I wanted to advise wikipedians that there was no malicious intent in removing this figure, which is readily available in the annual report on the company's website, to which there is a link on the page. And I appreciate any help you can provide to remedy this. Smfitz (talk) 16:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: correction

message: Regence is no longer #1 in enrollment in the State of Washington, according to the Washington OIC 2010 report (see http://www.insurance.wa.gov/publications/annual_reports/2010reportappendix/2010AppendixC.pdf)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.73.1.1 (talk) 16:40, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: correction
Talk:The Mint Las Vegas

message: Just to clarify that while it ceased operating as "The Mint" in 1988 the hotel and casino are still very much in use as the western portion of Binion's casino. 68.224.206.168 (talk) 23:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed 

message: Dear TeaDrinker:  If I were to reference a signed copy of a letter from a relative of Milton Prell referencing the event would you accept that as a valid reference to the event? Sirswindon (talk) 15:44, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name
Talk:Liebherr

message: They also make kitchen appliances  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.7.250 (talk) 09:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled