lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shamokin Dam, Pennsylvania

message: I removed the reference to the Tuscarora in the opening paragraph of the History section, because they didn't join the Iroquois Confederation until the 18th century, after they were defeated by English colonists in North Carolina. Also, the Gnadenhutten Massacre occurred in 1782, not 1755.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madtal (talk • contribs) 17:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

message: Shamokin Dam is governed by a seven member borough council elected at-large and an elected Mayor, Joseph A. McGranaghan.  Day to day operation of the borough is conducted by an appointed borough manager and borough secretary.  The borough workforce provides excellent municipal services including snow plowing, maintenance of municipal parks, and building and grounds maintenance and weekly brush and branch pickup.  The borough has a police department staffed by a chief and two fulltime and two part-time officers.  Code enforcement is provided by Keystone COG. 64.67.134.54 (talk) 17:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government
Talk:Garry Schofield

message: Was he born in Hunslet or Belle Isle, the two are distinct areas (now divided by the M621 (formerly M1) motorway) which would have been built around the time of Schofields birth)?  The article states both, Hunslet in the text and Belle Isle in the infobox.  Which is it to be? Mtaylor848 (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth place 
Talk:Affine manifold

message: Removed redirect to affine connection. Lots of redness here; in addition to the conjectures (which should go to separate pages of their own), the flat connection article should be written (saw a few Wiki pages referring to that). A very important topic - the most basic structure on a manifold, flat one, and much work was done on it. Tiphareth 22:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I agree. Mgvongoeden (talk) 17:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stableford

message: uncommonly used?
More than half the competitions I play are Stableford...
→ I agree with the unsigned comment above - modifying the article to suit Sesh 06:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: can your handicap go up in stableford??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.125.83 (talk) 19:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Handicap?
Talk:Bläserklasse

message: Maybe it would be better if the text of this article would be integrated into the school band-article. "Bläserklasse" is the german version of a school band. There are two systems: One is promoted by Yamaha, the other by german builders of wind instruments. In both cases the whole class decides to learn wind instruments; they have lessons by teachers specialized in the chosen instruments and lessons by a teacher of the school where they form a wind orchestra (or, mostly, rather a "beginning orchestra" or something). The concept is rather new in Germany, and I haven't been to one myself, so I would have to research a bit before I could add more information. --84.133.172.200 (talk) 16:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: German version of school band
Talk:Franz Krumm

message: Not that right. Following death registration card, No. G-A 832/1000 of Deutsche Dienststelle (WASt) Krumm died at Litizh near [south] of Komarichi - some 120 km south-west of Oryol. Not even in Oryol Oblast, but Bryansk Oblast, Russia. --129.187.244.19 (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  KIA near Oryol ?
Talk:U Street (Washington, D.C.)

message: I am removing this website as a reference (http://bowl.colian.org/chili-bowl/0.html) because it's a copy of wikipedia itself. How do I know? Besides the oddly familiar prose, the page also inexplicably includes my archived talk page! --D. Monack | talk 19:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing reference

message: The section on the 1960s had a number of sentences which had a racist slant, such as arguing that the area declined when racially restrictive covenants allowed African-American residents in, specifically mentioning African-Americans as the cause of the 1968 riots, and blaming white flight for the area becoming blighted. In fact, it was a largely African-American and prosperous area before the riots, and many of the merchants who moved out were also African-American. I've cleaned this section up somewhat, but it could use further edits, as well as additional sourced information. Dbalpert (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 20:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Racist slant to 1960s section

message: Is U Street the name of a street? If not, where does the name come from? This should at least be mentioned in the lead or the History section. —Frungi (talk) 03:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Several potential sources were included in the article as external links. They were removed in this edit Noting here in case anyone wants to consult those sources in future. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:09, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources listed as external links
Template talk:New York Jets staff

message: Hey The Writer 2.0, I really don't want to start an edit war here. So could you please explain to me why you reverted my recent edit? I don't understand it. It was based on sourced content, released by the Jets. Those are their official job titles. Why do you feel the need to list them in reverse order?
Thx Armchair QB (talk) 22:48, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was under the impression that it was listed the other way around (i.e. Bill Callahan was listed as O-Line/Assistant HC) but since you bought it to my attention I looked back and found it was the opposite. Anyway, no harm, no foul, I'll change it. And, for the record, they apparently listed the Assistant HC under the Head Coaches heading so I'll move that there too. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 23:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And regarding Lance Taylor, I figured since Brian Smith was listed under Quality Control/Defense the same would apply except Taylor is on offense (and he now had the assistant TE title) so that was the thinking behind that. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 23:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Job titles
Talk:Cross Colours

message: The end paragraph has too much language in that reads like a press release.  The entire article may as well have been started and written by a Cross Colours employee.  Not to mention, there is history that is worth noting here, as they used to advertise in rap magazines heavily, only to later have a investigative article written about them in The Source.  If no one else can locate it, I'll add this information myself.Kuahmel (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Press Release? 

message: I have added POV and advertisement tags to the article, for obvious reasons. If the article isn't drastically cleaned up, it would need to go to AfD. --Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 21:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags added

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Kalorama (Washington, D.C.)

message: Parts of this article sounded like they'd been written by someone trying to sell a house in the area - I'm not saying that in fact they were, but the phrasing was the same sort of gauzy, warm stuff about "hilly terrain and cool breezes", "elegantly spacious pre-war condominiums" making the neighborhood "the most prestigious and desirable address within the city limits of Washington, D.C."  It's all opinion and puffery, and unsourced to boot, so I removed it. It has no place in this encyclopedia article. --JohnInDC (talk) 13:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2013 cleanup 

message: The article uses two rivaling infoboxes. Putting in the correct coordinates in the section for the "Triangle" screws up the Coordinate Display on the top of the Page, so I took it out. Here's what it might say:
| lat_degrees = 38.9205
| lat_minutes =
| lat_seconds =
| lat_direction =
| long_degrees = 77.0465
| long_minutes =
| long_seconds =
 --BjKa (talk) 09:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 
Talk:NEC V20

message: I have a computer (Multiterm Portable Office) of which Norton System Information states has a Nec V20 CPU running at 16MHz, while the article states the maximum speed is 12MHz. I'll change it to 16, but I don't know the specified maximum clock speed of the CPU. Rderijcke 23:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Sydex 22NICE is another emulator which can access the 8080 functions of the V20 and V30. 22NICE also emulates an 8080 on other x86 CPUs but at a substantial speed penalty on contemporary 1980's and early 1990's systems. Bizzybody (talk) 07:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other emulators. 

message: I upgraded my 8088 to a V-20 and it was faster.  If I remember correctly, the V-20 had a hardware divide whereas the 8088 did not.  Is that correct?  If so, it can go in the article.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 22:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division? 

message: "The V20 was reported to have been compatible with the Intel 8087 floating-point unit (FPU) coprocessor.[6]"
I can confirm that seems to be the case, back in the early '90s my first PC had a 10MHz (I think) V20 and an 8087 co-processor and the two appeared to function properly.
SlySven (talk) 11:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  8087 Compatibility 

message: This article (except perhaps the variants section) seems to have adequate inline citations. If anything, maybe it should be moved to a section template in the variants section? The tag has been there for almost 10 years, and it seems better-cited than many other articles I've seen. I might be bold and go ahead and remove it -- if you disagree, we can continue the discussion here.  MrAureliusRTalk! 00:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of citation needed template
Talk:EDIF

message: It's not really true to state as this article does that the syntax was generated from the model 'as an after thought'. In fact a large number of the semantic constraints were enforced through the syntax though the mapping in 3 0 0 was fairly poor. The additions made in 4 0 0 had a much more direct mapping from the information model itself. The article also fails to note that a semantic validator was developed that validated the files generated by the various different tools against the specification of the information model was developed for 3 0 0 and later expanded to cover 4 0 0. This tool was developed by human understanding of the EXPRESS model rather than auto-generated from it.
It is not the case that 'most constraints ended up just being described as comments' there are some defined as such, but a very small proportion of the total. The statement that 'Most of the others became elaborate formal descriptions which most readers will never be able to decipher, and therefore may not stand up to automated debugging/compiling' is more defensible. Certainly I found that there were a large number of constraints expressed in conceptually clear but computationally inefficient forms, however I don't remember this reflecting the majority. I leave to someone else to decide if 'most readers will never be able to decipher' them. I'll note here that I didn't work on the modelling itself, merely on the validator.
Rich.
Anon: This page could mention more about converters. eg:
EDIF2NGD converts an industry-standard EDIF netlist to an NGO file--a Xilinx-specific format. http://toolbox.xilinx.com/docsan/xilinx4/data/docs/dev/apxb2.html
Lothartklein 20:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems to me that EDIF is rarely used nowadays. Why? Has´ve other standards, languages or tools taken over, and if so, what are they? Or has the need for EDIF simply disappeared? If so, why? --HelgeStenstrom (talk) 11:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and future
Template talk:Jacksonville Jaguars staff

message: I'm sorry, but I disagree with User:Armchair QB on the matter of how or where Mel Tucker should be listed.  I don't think he's wrong; there's certainly good reason for what he's done.  But I think on balance my version () is slightly better.  Here's why:
#Tucker is clearly, undeniably a member of the defensive coaching staff.  AQB's version () muddies this fact.
#More to the point above, Tucker is the leader of the defensive coaching staff.  Yet he's not listed there.
#AQB's version changes the heading "Head Coach" to "Head Coaches".  This is not accurate.  There is only one head coach.  Unless an explicit arrangement were to exist to the contrary, the term "Head Coaches" would constitute an oxymoron.
#Finally, in a point that I acknowledge is mere speculation, but explains why I feel this way, I think that Tucker's "Assistant Head Coach" strikes me as largely a titular position, one intended to reward him for a job well done in the team's final games, as well as incentive to get him to stay on as defensive coordinator.
Those are my thoughts. 98.82.34.127 (talk) 04:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They are all valid thoughts. I don't think one way is necessarily better than the other. Since they do have the title of AHC, some would argue they deserve to be separated from the rest, and would fit under the "head coaches" heading (which is why it's plural). Then there's others who argue that they should be separated or duplicated. I remember with the Bears template two years ago, with Marinelli specifically, that someone wanted to put him as AHC in the HC section, and DC in the defensive coaches section. Since the way you changed it from is the way that all the other templates are, and the way they've all been on historical team articles (i.e. 2007 New England Patriots season), then it would probably create less work (and would be more consistent) if I reverted what your changes. But again, I don't think either way is necessarily better. Pats1 T/C 17:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your genuine consideration of my point of view.  If you'd prefer, the duplication option (noting Tucker both in the Head Coaches and Defensive categories is okay by me. 98.82.34.127 (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually wasn't a fan of that idea back when it was proposed for the Bears' page. Just think it creates too much confusion. Also, as far as the head caoch(es) thing goes, I think it's worth keeping it as-is. Teams like the Redskins under Gibbs (more recently) had dedicated assistant head coaches who fell under that heading. And likewise, we still keep it as "special teams coaches" or "strength and conditioning coaches" even if there's only one of each. Pats1 T/C 21:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head coachES?
Talk:LeDroit Park

message: I'm pretty sure it is one word, my source being the gate in the photo.
--Jazzcowboy (talk) 22:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Le Droit or LeDroit

message: Article says:
:"In July 1888, students tore down the fences that separated the neighborhood in protest of its discriminating policies."
But there is no citation, no source.  I wonder if 1888 is a typo for 1988?
One thought: 
:The chapter by Ronald M. Johnson in Washington at Home (2nd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010, p. 231) 231 elaborates on this--as more complicated than just one event. Endnotes there to contemporary newspaper articles show the conflict ran from 1886 to 1891. I'll try to reword a little.Johannes der Taucher (talk) 12:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it July, 1888 or July,  1988 ?? a source is needed
MediaWiki talk:Wrongpassword

message: Since this message appears when either the password or the confirmation code is entered incorrectly, please could it be changed to Incorrect password or confirmation code entered. Please try again. This should reduce confusion if people don't notice the captcha and are unsure what they got wrong when they try to log in. Tra (Talk) 23:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 23:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention confirmation code 

message: Add an id attribute to this message, so that it may be referred to by automated processes and user style sheets:
:Incorrect password or confirmation code entered. Please try again.
Thanks -- Gurch (talk) 22:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request 

message: Times have changed and a CAPTCHA is no longer triggered after a single unsuccessful login attempt (I think it now requires two or three login attempts to trigger the CAPTCHA). The current wording ("Incorrect password or confirmation code entered. Please try again.") is needlessly confusing, in my opinion. Can it be changed back to the default ("Incorrect password entered. Please try again.")? --MZMcBride (talk) 20:57, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, the prior wording is too wordy & confusing. Skier Dude (talk) 02:33, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So what is the message if you DO type it incorrectly 3 times ? The same or is there an additional message ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've marked the edit request as answered, as it seems this could do with a bit more discussion. Please see the new thread I've opened up about this at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#MediaWiki:Wrongpassword. Thanks — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 05:11, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Thread was archived to Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 102#MediaWiki:Wrongpassword with no comment other than the OP. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Right... so given that the message is unambiguously ambiguous, is there any reason not to restore it to its default? I'm not sure why discussion is needed here; the community seems to agree that discussion is needed. Just make the change already.... --MZMcBride (talk) 18:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done..Thanks. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change back to default
Talk:Shine, Jesus, Shine

message: What's the problem, Walter, with obviating "However" as the headword in a sentence? I sense you're guarding the article (that song is not my favorite either), but some editors just don't want to see "However" at the start of a sentence even when you and I consider it okay. Thus I changed it to "Nonetheless," and you reverted the change. Why? If either word is correct in that instance but one resolves all objections, why the reversion? I just want to learn. I'm not fond of edit wars. Rammer (talk) 22:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that it places one sentence in contrast with the other. :WP:NPOV implies that we should simply supply the facts and not words like that. It's clear that the one is a survey of laity while the other is from a professional. In other words, the masses love it while the experts don't. I would just leave the sentences alone. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "However" at start of sentence
Talk:Mount Vernon Square

message: I'm not a regular at this article, so will leave it to others to place or not place this new image. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:54, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New image needing placement

message: It would be great if someone knowledgeable could insert a section on the former underground restrooms at Mt Vernon Square.  The entrance portals can be seen on K Street, just east of 9th St (directly across from the K St entrance to the Renaissance Hotel).  These two portals are sealed with metal doors and leave no indication about their prior use.  According to an old-timer I know, they were closed in the 1980s, due to law enforcement's inability to control lewd behavior there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.121.14.12 (talk) 19:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underground Restrooms
Talk:Boylan Catholic High School

message: :Boylan banned the viewing of Wikipedia on its computers in the fall of 2007. This has caused this particular article to be less than perfect.
--Closeapple (talk) 08:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stephen Malkmus and the Jicks

message: While interesting (I would really love to get my hands on that bootleg!), I'm not sure if this qualifies as encyclopedic content...Wantsarevolution (talk) 07:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Milwaukee Show setlist
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockford

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:00, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Ligeti (surname)

message: Any support for having Ligeti redirect to Gyorgy Ligeti and then making this page "Ligeti (disambiguation)" -- the composer is so much more famous than any of the other noteworthy people that his article would be what I would expect if I typed in Ligeti.  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 23:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree entirely: Ligeti should go straight to György. 138.37.199.206 07:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  I noticed also that all pages which linked to Ligeti meant to link to the composer.  So it makes more sense to link there.  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 18:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)