lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Siberian intervention

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:The Illustration of The Siberian War, No. 16. The Japanese Army Occupied Vragaeschensk (Blagoveshchensk).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 23, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-05-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 16:42, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:The Illustration of The Siberian War, No. 16. The Japanese Army Occupied Vragaeschensk (Blagoveshchensk).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The caption under one of the photos on this page states that the killed people were Bolsheviks. However, the summary on the image's page tells us that they were in fact Czechoslovaks. A caption on the article on Czechoslovak Legion conveys the same meaning.
The caption under this photo File:Bolshveki killed at Vladavostak.jpg is contradictory with the one in Czechoslovak Legions. -Aronlee90 (talk) 18:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A photo on the page 

message: Page 401
http://books.google.com/books?id=HSR5AAAAIAAJ&q=blagovensk&dq=blagovensk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Si_AUNWHB-a50AHy2YAQ&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAw
Page 401
http://books.google.com/books?id=Nub3bsjeLX0C&q=blagovensk&dq=blagovensk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Si_AUNWHB-a50AHy2YAQ&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBA
Rajmaan (talk) 06:42, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese capture of blagovensk 

message: Removing the sentence, "What about the 2/6th cycle brigade of the Royal Sussex Regiment sent from India to Vladivostok ?" Maybe it's an interesting question, but it surely doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. Dgndenver (talk) 23:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing question about UK participation
Talk:Vandal bot

message: I was using the term "vandal bot" in my own wiki and linked to here expecting it to already exist as the term is used elsewhere in Wikipedia and in the general net community. I was surprised to see the article didn't exist and created a stub for it, if you don't think its appropriate just delete it I don't mind. --Nad 07:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be a notable subject, but I have removed all the content mentioning Wikipedia-specific bots per Wikipedia:Avoid self-references. --Mr. Lefty  (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Flag of Gran Colombia

message: At this time, the illustration of the Second Flag of Gran Colombia has the following caption:
"Second Flag of Gran Colombia 1820-1821. Stripe ratios 3:2:1"
But in fact the illustration has the ratios 2:1:1. So there's a problem here. Any suggestions? Y-barton (talk) 06:57, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Y-barton (talk) 02:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Flag of Gran Colombia stripe ratios 

message: At this time, the illustration of the Fourth Flag of Gran Colombia shows a light blue stripe with a coat of arms with 3 stars. However, the description reads "the coat of arms was taken off the flag, and replaced with stars" and "The color of the blue stripe was also changed to the dark blue seen on the flags of its successors". I can't find any primary sources of the illustration, but wiki flags shows something akin to the flag described as the Third Flag of Gran Colombia as the final flag (of course, I have no idea if they're a reputable primary source!). --Banned (talk) 18:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth Flag of Gran Colombia - colors and coat of arms
Talk:Japanese ironclad Ryūjō

message: The web site http://www.aberdeenships.com/sb_alexander_hall.asp? says that:
* This ship was "built" in 1868
* The first name starts "Jho" not "Jo" (presumably it was named in Aberdeen and named "Jho...", but "Jo" might be more approriate?)
 
Is the date 1864 in the Wikipedia title correct?
(My interest is that Alexander Hall was one of my forebears!)--Duncanogi (talk) 12:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese battleship Ryujo (1864)
Talk:Non-church movement

message: I believe Mukyōkai should be listed as its own separate movement and not lumped into some other generic thread. And I think other religious movement entries should also be separate.  I don't want to have to read all the other threads attributed to a non-church movement just to focus on the Mukyōkai.  It tends to wash them out.  Where do we stop if we start merging similar sounding topics?  And who's to say what goes with what?  Are all the Christian sects going to end up being one big article on variations of Catholicism?  How far does it go? I believe it will be more clear if each gets its own day in the sun. There could also be a generic article on the overarching religion of which it is a subset, but keep it in its own category, please. The one reason to lump all religions into one article is that more eyes will see the various paragraph subsets and more eyes seeing mean more accuracy, generally.
:Wait a minute.  These cover the same thing, either that or the translation on this article, and the term's meaning on the other article are incorrect. I'm going to merge these because they are the same thing and are two very short articles to begin with, and any distinction would be better served (if they were only slightly different) in one (only slightly longer) main article. Radagast83 07:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion

message: Ban Ki Moon is a member.  As a prominent world leader, he should be linked in from this article.  Also, it would be useful to have some explanation of this religion in Korea and Taiwan. 75.38.0.113 (talk) 19:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ban Ki Moon
Talk:Attack from Atlantis

message: Can someone please explain why the cover-image was reverted? I believe according to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels template/guidelines a 1st edition is preferable. If I don't hear anything back in a few days, I will revert. FusionKnight 13:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to revert again. If you have comments please make them here before making a change to the image again. Thank you. FusionKnight 23:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, here goes. I'm reverting to the version with the 1st edition cover. If someone has an objection, please let's talk about it on the talk page first, and come up with a compromise. Thanks. FusionKnight 22:56, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Image
Talk:Drunken Monkey

message: == Description of Techniques ==
The Drunken Monkey Technique is a complete system with many forms inclusive of both weapon and emptyhand. However in the main article the writer makes it sound as though the Drunken Monkey technique consists of a single form, this couldn't be further from the truth. Like all monkey forms, the weapon of choice is the staff, however there is the broadsword, the spear, the gim or straight sword and of course the iron ring. This is the most advanced, the most difficult technique the most unpredictable of the Monkey System and the most deadly in combat. - Debon 11:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Long-thumbed frog

message: I think the article should be moved to Barking Marsh Frog or Fletcher's Frog, I haven't even heard the name "Long-thumbed Frog" be used for the species. -- Froggydarb croak 08:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's given as names on frogs.org.au and frogaustralia, however I've already made redirects for the other pages and given the 3 names for the species in the article.--Tnarg12345 09:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it really matters with a frog which is not known by many lay-people. No need to change it, it is Long-thumbed Frog in Barker, Grigg and Tyler. Also, just for future reference, if a redirect page has only one edit in its history, then any user can move to it. I am also willing to move any non-controversial moves. It is basically just a discussion between us three as I doubt anyone else is watching this page yet. Thanks --liquidGhoul 10:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Ghiorsium

message: Definitely, merge. No need for a separate topic. Femto 11:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It's certainly notable enough to be included on Wikipedia, but not in its own article (especially considering how easy it would be to merge this single paragraph into a considerably larger article). -- Kicking222 23:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And, now that I take another look, almost all of the info in this article is already in the article on Ununoctium. -- Kicking222 23:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

text: yes -LifeEnemy 23:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Language school

message: This page is entirely an opinion.
language
*I remade the page - actually I removed most of the previous material.  Some, if not all, of the previous text is most likely taken from other websites, almost verbatim, and reflects advertising.  Others are free to review and edit my revisions. Roehl Sybing 19:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for reworking the page. I don't believe that the information about the cost of programs is really important to the content of the article. I also see a problem with linking to commercial sites as a reference for these costs. This information is easily available to anyone who is interested through a search engine. I'll remove them for the time being. Nposs 15:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Analog telephone adapter

message: Why does this article call it an analog telephony adapter? All of the products that the article mentions/depicts as examples are named analog *telephone* adapters by their manufacturers. I have never heard it called a telephony adapter before, and suggest that this article be renamed unless it can be demonstrated that telephony adapter is a more common name. --Miken2005 08:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: ATAs are not just used to connect telephones. Fax machines, answering machines, modems, etc. are equally usable. The ATA is also not a VoIP-specific box. ATAs have been used for some time to connect fax machines and other POTS devices to PBX/key systems that otherwise only allow proprietary sets to be used, or to ISDN lines or Centrex service. Thus, claiming that an ATA is a box to connect phones to VoIP is only true in certain, recent cases, and so this article needs a lot of rework there. --Miken2005 08:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just phones and not just VoIP
Talk:Lower extremity of humerus

message: The epicondyles are NOT condyles.  Could someone please correct this?  See here http://www.innerbody.com/image_skelfov/skel37_new.html for a clarification.  Thanks.  - Bobsagat, Oct 23, 2009, 7:51 PM CST  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobsagat (talk • contribs) 00:51, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cardiosurgery

message: There already is the article Cardio-thoracic surgery. Is a new article necessary? Dan D. Ric 09:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to redirect this to the Cardiac surgery article. Dan D. Ric 09:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need this article?
Talk:List of Negima!? episodes

message: "Look for it"...where? I don't watch the subs. The last title lacked the "by Eva" part. Atashi 18:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected the title again after talking with Shimei. 使う means to use, not to make. 'Temporary Pactio' is used on Wikipedia's Magic in Negima page. Atashi 01:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode 3 Title
Talk:List of counties of England by population in 1971

message: we could do with more notes about this: county boroughs are obviously included with the counties, but does Lincoln count towards Lindsey's population, and where does York get accounted?  Morwen - Talk 09:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The data is taken directly from the census database without any further calculation. It is drawn from "Total persons" against "Counties" (no county options or descriptors were available). I can drill down to county, local government district, wards and enumeration districts to learn how the figures were arrived at. By doing this I see that Lincoln CB is counted as part of Kesteven and York as part of the West Riding. I do not have access to notes on the geographic methodology of the 1971 census (as far as I can tell). But as it is not that old perhaps they can be accessed in a half decent library? MRSC 09:44, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure Kesteven, not Lindsey!  It was usually associated with the latter.  It would also be good to have List of administrative counties and county boroughs of England by population in 1971 if you could manage that.  Morwen - Talk 13:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Ace. (I presume also Teesside is North Riding?) Morwen - Talk 14:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is. I am going to start by constructing the admin county table. MRSC 14:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: It appears the 1971 data was later aggregated to match the 1974 boundaries and published by HMSO in 1976. I think I will be able to get access to this data. It would be good to show a comparison of population, using the same data set, before and after the changes. MRSC 12:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be excellent for comparison.  Morwen - Talk 13:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Further reading
Talk:Computerra

message: My sentence about difference of "Computerra" from other computer magazines is very raw and should be reworked. Geevee 09:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carrickfergus Advertiser

message: This seems to be mainly a description of the hard times the newspaper is going through. Please could the author read the Wikipedia policy about the neutral point of view and re-write according to that policy? See articles on The Times  or The Daily Sketch for the sort of article that Wikipedia has on newspapers. Tonywalton  | Talk 09:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa

message: Can anyone confirm that http://twitter.com/khalidalkhalifa is his official Twitter account?
I've found this article .
Would it be worth a link on this biography?
-- 14:52, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's his official Twitter account. Sometime in 2011 he used to be #1 in Bahrain, now overtaken -by a mile- by Nabeel Rajab. Useful information (good for copy-editing) can be found here. Mohamed CJ (talk) 08:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twitter account 
Talk:List of fictional prisons

message: Don't revert my change!  I am right.
Of course, it will be reverted, people will come to this site and be misinformed.  I will not babysit this entry.Blue Spider 09:44, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

message: If anyone's interested, a new wikiproject has been proposed for the creation and improvement of articles regarding specific prisons, internment camps, and detention centers here.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: Iron heights from DC Comics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Heights_Penitentiary  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.242.137.41 (talk) 09:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing entry 

message: Not even going to start trying to get inside that code.
Park Ridge jail (Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) from Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries (Series 1 Episode 1), 2012. Notstopping (talk) 16:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another missing entry
Talk:Pluripotency

message: I think this stub should be                                                                                                                 merged with four closely related stubs into a new page titled "Cell Potency".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RAC e CA12 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tommy Reilly (harmonica player)

message: Villa Lobos wrote a harmonica concerto for John Sebastian, not Tommy Reilly. 
Tommy issued a CD "Harmonica Works", highlighting many orginial works for harmonica, some of them are dedicted to Tommy. Yes, Villa-Lobos' concerto is included in this CD, but it was dedicated to John Sebastian, not Tommy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allan Ho (talk • contribs) 09:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Villa Lobos
Template talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups

message: When set to |small=yes, this template doesn't "float" on the right side of the screen but instead forces the text (or table of contents, etc.) to start on the line below it. For an example see :Talk:Jew. —Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 16:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be easy to change, if desired. I made it that way, tho, 'cause the floating version hosed up other pages (tho I disremember exactly which page I was thinking of at the time...) .. hmm... --Ling.Nut 23:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be a good idea. Since it takes up more vertical space in the small mode than it does as a banner, it defeats the purpose if it doesn't float and instead pushes the text down. Thanks! —Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 05:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, "try try see" :-) --Ling.Nut 16:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. :Talk:Jew looks much neater now! —Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 16:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Small parameter not floating

message: I'm now in the midst of setting up a Project-wide peer review, modeled after WP:BIOPR.  Would it be possible to add a similiar peer-review request parameter to this template, something like peer-review=yes? That would be a wonderful step forward for the Project. Thank you! -Fsotrain09 16:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Let me think about it. Can get it done relatively quickly if my schedule permits... --Ling.Nut 17:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem! User:Voice of All has taken it upon him/herself to delete at least one and perhaps more categories used by WP:ETHNIC. This template's makes such  categories available for editors' convenience. I dunno if the cat I create for peer reviews will subsequently be deleted... I would say "sneaky-deleted," but it is possible these deletions were announced somewhere.... --Ling.Nut 18:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Did this (category thing) get sorted out? - Jmabel | Talk 01:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review parameter 

message: In Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council/Archive 21#Proposal: Disallow transcluded to-do lists a consensus developed that to-do lists should not be transcluded onto banner templates. How about we replace it with a link to the list? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing translcuded tasks to a link 

message: The redirect Template:WPEG has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Estopedist1 (talk) 04:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Template:WPEG]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Necrophobia

message: Should there be a separate article for thanatophobia and necrophobia because they are different things, i'm going to expand this article to have two sections first, then perhaps split it later into two separate articles?
:You may expand only basing on wikipedia rules: WP:Attribution, no original essays and citing reputable sources. `'Miikka 04:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. `'Miikka 04:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for thanatophobia 

message: Isn't there a homophobia?  I am not making a joke.
Hyper Zergling (talk) 04:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for digging that up. I can only imagine the arduous research that went into trying to finding that. Tisane talk/stalk  03:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homophobia 

message: Isn't there such things as a "healthy" fear of death? Or does almost everyone have necrophobia/thanatophobia/whatever? Tisane talk/stalk  03:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added more information to the article. All of it came from a reference already included. Feel free to clean it up a bit. To put it simply, though, just about everyone fears death, but this phobia is an abnormal fear of death or dying—a fear intense enough to interfere with one's daily life. Most people don't have that problem. TaintedMustard (talk) 13:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Healthy" fear of death?

message: I think the information you added could have been a little more thorough here, instead of saying "With all types of emotions..." maybe be a little more clear, but other than that the information you added was good.
Mp176418 (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Information was alright, seemed like it was somewhat of an opinion. though you did mention two treatments for this.
(Sterney21 (talk) 00:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psy 101 Review 

message: Afraid when I die and get buried underground that I will know it..  Like ur soul is trapped or something and I will kno it.. No one will kno till they die.. So I'm afraid, scared... Samantha Honeycutt (talk) 03:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dying and being buried
Talk:Peter Heppner

message: Just to let everyone know... they don't capitalise their own song titles, the proper form is lowercased [except the German songs]. ^_^ Just fyi, so we're not editing back and forth =D ~Kaiti~ 10:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I guess there's way more info out there, but is this still a Stub? -Bundesamt 20:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Point. I think not... I'll remove it and if someone disagrees they can add it back in kaiti-sicle 15:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Still a Stub?

message: Hey... I sincerely doubt it, but can anyone find and source a birthday for this guy? I'll love you forever kaiti-sicle 21:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthday

message: mr happner where had u filmed the song "I FEEL YOU"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.136.138.73 (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "I Feel You" was filmed on the german island "Rügen".P. Heppner (talk) 11:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  where 
Talk:Germany and weapons of mass destruction

message: There was in 2006 one former defence minister in germany who said germany should build up it's own nuclear bomb. But there wasn't any big debate in german society and political staff. Ok such things won't be debate much in public.--134.147.117.56 10:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also it's interesting that in 2007 the french president ask germany offically if germany and france should share the power of nuclear weapons and germany so also have the chance to get weapons of mass destruction. see:   --134.147.31.157 16:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I removed "Allied research into organophosphates had been kept secret to protect DDT". DDT is not an organophosphate, and the first organophosphate pesticide, parathion, was developed during the war by IG Farben itself. The insecticidal properties of DDT were discovered by a Swiss chemist in 1939, but the compound and its synthesis were known in Germany, even if large-scale production and use of DDT did not happen except on the Allied side. The anecdote may be true, but I can't verify it because the cited book isn't publically available, and I thought it was best to remove it from this article unless it can be verified. Roches (talk) 01:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Allied research into organophosphates had been kept secret to protect [[DDT]]" 

message: U.S. chemical weapons in Germany needs mention.  I may come back to it. Johnvr4 (talk) 22:44, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. chemical weapons in Germany 

message: East Germany had Soviet WMDs on its territory, for instance the SS-3 Shyster. Sophie means wisdom (talk) 20:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Germany