Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Powderfinger

message: Another GA, guys! Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know how I missed it, but how cool is this? Yeah!! WOOOT! LOL. --lincalinca 04:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it was a few days ago :) Party time. I actually think some of those DYKs could also be passed... Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So now we need to get Powderfinger and Dream Days to FA and Bernie to GA and we're right to submit for FT? That's how I see it. --lincalinca 08:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work to you guys!  I had nothing to do with this one this time :-)  You got it to GA fairly quick once the edits started happening.  Keep up the good work!  Slabba 08:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I Don't Remember just passed too - That's 4 now!  You can help on the next one Slab; Passenger (Powderfinger song) is in quite good shape, it just needs track times I think... — H2O —  09:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the track times are done, so it's been nommed now too. We're really developing a lot of momentum now. I reckon we should start trying to get Bernie up after this. BLP articles are a LOT harder than song and album articles, but I think it's quite achievable. --lincalinca 10:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Certainly is a lot more info on "Passenger" now! I won't have much time to contribute until at least another week, then I'll try and help out some more tidying up the articles and adding some info where I can. Slabba 04:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't feel pressured to do anything you don'e have the time for. Wikipedia will still bere here when you get back. In the meantime, we'll just remove you from our project list... Just kidding. Do what you have to do. Wikipedia comes second. --lincalinca 05:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:There is no deadline...Wikipedia:There is no deadline, unless you're Slabba.  Hmm... :P — H2O —  07:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL! :-) Had to laugh at those comments! Slabba 05:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Transfusion (EP)]] = GA 

message: This sounds like a pretty obvious answer, since the active participants are often active, but I want to list them as bold on the project page. --lincalinca 06:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roll call 

message: Hi guys, I've just recently joined Wikipedia and your wonderful project for an awesome band, and I thought I'd try my hand at creating the Paul Piticco article listed as needed. Any comments, criticisms, suggestions, tips, or improvements to the article are welcomed and appreciated. jmfarquhar 03:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dude, you rock.  It just needs a bit of copyediting etc., but great work nonetheless.  I've nominated it at T:TDYK too :) — H2O —  04:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, welcome aboard! Generally, there's been four "main" members of our clan, with occasional input from other editors, and so to add a fifth is fantastic! The job you did creating the PP article's definitely getting you off on the right foot. --lincalinca 04:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks :) Hope I can be of help in the future. jmfarquhar 05:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Piticco 

message: I was just checking out the list of Stub articles from the link on the project page and I saw that the talk page for "Talk:Belter (song)" is still active.  So I just deleted the references to wikiprojects, dunno if we need to formally delete the talk page.  Also I'm sure there's probably other dead pages that need cleaning up. Slabba 07:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On a side note, what's the go with Tiddas, it's got the Powderfinger wikiproject banner.  I don't know what its connection is.  Anyone know? Slabba 07:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Passenger (Powderfinger song), among others. --lincalinca 09:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mystery solved!  Thanks linca. Slabba 21:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belter and other dead pages 

message: Ok, we've got Passenger up to GA now, so what onto now? Should we all unite and put all of our efforts towards improving the Powderfinger article to get it to FA? Sebi has started a Musical style scratchpad for anybody who wants to contribute there (use the talk page there to discuss it too). As it looks like the Side Projects page will be deleted, not for due reason, but because consensus seems to point that way, I'm going to keep the code for the page on one of my subpages and implement it on the Powderfinger page if it's deleted. Sebi and H2O have given heaps of work towards improving the referencing on the Powderfinger article, and so now we're looking very good to make this a reality. Who's in for this? It'll prepare us to easily get Bernie up to GA (and perhaps up to FA). --lincalinca 04:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Stuff that needs to be done for Powderfinger can be found here and here. The styles thing is the big one. — H2O —  08:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Flurry! 

message: I've just been adding some reviews to Double Allergic, Internationalist, and Odyssey Number Five to expand the articles a bit. Let me know what you think, there is still room for improvement I reckon, but it's a start. Slabba 06:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work slabster! From these we can get under the fingernails of the albums and expand them accordingly. --lincalinca 08:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album reviews 

message: Whilst it says on the ARIA site that Tom Whitten of Powderfinger was nominated for Engineer of the Year for "Automatic" in 1996 , there is a discussion on this forum that it doesn't exist and may in fact supposed to be Double Allergic .  I don't reckon we need to create a page, as a nomination for Engineer of the Year for a song no one seems to have heard of doesn't seem very notable :-) Slabba 07:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think creating the Tim Whitten page would be a good idea, but we should do some checking to see why DA was referred to with that name in the ARIAs. Plus, DA received most of its nominations the next year, so it's a bit funny? --lincalinca 08:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: DA means...? By the way - "All i can tell ya is in 96 they toured with the BAND Automatic." () - I'm with Slabba on not creating, but we should mention the Engineer award somewhere. Dihydrogen Monoxide 08:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: DA=Double Allergic.  Makes a bit more sense if there's a band called "Automatic". Slabba 21:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Automatic was the working title of Double Allergic, apparently. I was talking to a guy from church about it this morning. Unfortunately he's not exactly an encyclopedically "reliable source" as it were, but it's at least a direction to look into to try to get some answers. It's strange, though, that ARIA would award it based on the wrong title. But if the band they toured with (which from memory is made up on members of Tumbleweed and Custard) recorded with Tim Whitten, then that would explain it, but it doesn't explain why they're being given the credit on the official ARIA website. It's all quite strange. --lincalinca 00:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps ARIA never updated after Double Allergic Automatic won? I'm confused too... Dihydrogen Monoxide 02:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Automatic" 

message: I like what's been done to the "These Days" page, amazing what happens when you add a little extra info to the page :-) I reckon it could almost get upgraded from Start class.  It must be close to B class at least. Slabba 05:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I'm thinking we GAC it soon.  Internationalist will also be there shortly ;)  Oh, and Dream Days is going to FAC some time in the near future. Dihydrogen Monoxide 08:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  These Days 

message: I'd really like to get an "Influences" section up and running before the article goes to FAC. Below I've compiled a list of a few interviews with members of the band which discuss influences, so if anyone would like to try their hand at adding to what I've proposed further below.
* Interview with Jon Coghill
* Yahoo! interview with Darren and Bernard
* Some news article that talks about Bourbon Street influences
* And most of the sources provided on this sandbox
----
On different occasions, Powderfinger have cited their influences as <influences here>...
Spebi 06:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical style on [[Powderfinger]] 

message: Sooo...... Nick DiDia now is articled. Quite an impressive resume he has, might I say! The article needs a LOT of expansion, but it's created now. Go sick! --lincalinca 09:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Groovy, nice work.  He's got quite a resume, so I figure there'd be a few more sources out there.  Time to google it! Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nick DiDia 

message: It's official!  Music video available here.  Release date: December 1 (my birthday!).  Hopefully, some other RS will make mention of it, and we can get an article up soon. Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice one. It was somewhat obvious, though I was half expecting it to be "Who Really Cares?" but this is just as good. --lincalinca 06:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Nobody Sees]] announced! 

message: ... here :) Spebi 09:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Powderfinger]] at FAC 

message: I don't understand why no one has created a comment about Dream Days becoming a featured article.  Anyway, well done to you guys who did some great work on the article in bringing it to FA status. Slabba (talk) 06:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha, thanks Slab.  By the way, for everyone, there's a makeshift to-do list for the article at User_talk:Dihydrogen_Monoxide/Archive/November_2007#Dream_Days. Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 06:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dream Days FA 

message: Okay, so now we have a Featured Powderfinger article. Woot! How about we now get all of the albums and members up to B class (and maybe even put a couple up for GA just for kicks to see what we can do to improve them) and once everything's considerably stabler and better than now, we launch into making Powderfinger a featured group? --lincalinca 03:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's Featured Topic ;)  Internationalist (album) is currently at GAC, and the other ones shouldn't be much harder (PCentral has heaps on DA and O#5).  I'm mostly worried about Parables - there isn't that much that I can find that's of a decent quality.  Time to start listing some websites down here, if we can... Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 05:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All albums at least great GA (not just another "only just passed", crappy GA) or FA (and not crappy FA, either), then we take them to featured topic candidates. :) Spebi 05:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way, it'll take a while.  And I don't see what you mean by "only just passed GA" - I'm sure we could go to GAR or something if there was a concern with the reviewer... Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 05:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't think it's that long off, but I think the albums only need to be upper B class, likewise the members pages. To me, those are the greater areas of concern, since almost all of them are very short stubs. --lincalinca 11:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Back on this topic, I think it's time we finally got off our arses and improved the member pages. I've created an invitation, so I'll be inviting everybody who's a member of the Project to participate. I've started the ball rolling by bringing Cogsy's article from a barebones stub (it almost could have not been there and the result would have been the same) to what I now consider to be an upper end start class article, completely referenced and its prose is adequate now. --lincalinca 10:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Group 

message: Hi all. I'm having a bit of trouble working out the order these were released in. I could only find a source saying "Since You've Been Gone" was released in March 2004, and I know Sunsets was released in June (it's a GA, etc.). At the same time, IIRC SYBG came after Sunsets. Any thoughts/ideas? — Dihydrogen Monoxide 06:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm... I can't remember (don't)... but On My Mind was definitely first and I'm pretty sure Love Your Way was the second single. After that, all I remember them playing on the radio was Stumblin' and Sunsets, though Stumblin' wasn't a proper single, so it doesn't count. I don't think I ever heard SYBG on the radio, and I didn't get the cd single either. Sorry mate, I don't think I can help you there. --lincalinca 07:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember hearing SYGB now - in fairly early (May or earlier) 2004...I dunno - try some googling? — Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles from [[Vulture Street]] 

message: ... has been created :) Portal:Powderfinger. Help required – start by filling in some of the gaps in the Selected content, making sure to keep the selected picture and article different. If you can dig up some old DYKs, feel free to add them to the DYK talk page. Spebi 20:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powderfinger portal 

message: I've done some work on Mr Kneebone, but can't find track times. If anybody can find them, please post them, because I think it's ready to go to GA pretty soon. A review or two would be of a lot of help too, though. --lincalinca 03:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Kneebone 

message: Okay, I've just done some work over here, but I still feel it needs some more TLC before I put it up for GA. Anybody? --rm 'w avu 11:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems you put it up. Also seems OK to me. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 02:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lost and Running]] 

message: As of November 1, PF newsletters are hosted online at http://www.powderfinger.com/12all/index.php?action=archive&mode=archive&nl_search=1 Wikipedia:WikiProject Powderfinger/Fanclub will no longer be updated (unless someone wants to make a backup). Cheers, — Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New online archive 

message: "I Don't Remember", one of our first GAs for a song, is now at Peer Review, because we want to see if we can pop this up as a Featured article. Then, we only need to get "Black Tears" and "Nobody Sees" up to GA (both are on that trajectory now), and we can submit Dream Days as a Featured Topic. Not much work, huh? Okay, it is a bit of work, but it should be fine. Just a bit of time. Can't hurt us, can it? Anyway, everybody spam tap the shoulder of people who know how to peer review and point them in IDR's direction. The more peer review, the better, because more improvement only consolidates the chances of passing the FAC successfully. --rm 'w avu 08:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So far, the peer review's going really well. Anybody willing to lend a hand, feel free to head over there and look at the suggestions and see what you can do to implement them. Of course, anything else you see needing work at IDR would be great! --rm 'w avu 08:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Don't Remember 

message: Why is Parables for Wooden Ears under the scope of WP:HMM, yet no other PF articles are? —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 05:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Parables was considered to be Metal, but after releasing it, Powderfinger's style softened, such that Double Allergic wouldn't fall under HMM's scope. At least, in my opinion. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 10:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 08:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say DA is borderline, though is the group's best "rock" album... hell, I still think it's their best, and one of the best Australian rock almbums of all time, alongside Woodface and Back in Black. --rm 'w avu 11:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:HMM]] 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: I created Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Newsletter/Current and updated it with August 2007's newsletter (the most recent one I could find). The page was created so that Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Newsletters doesn't have to be continuously updated. After you create each new newsletter just paste the entire newsletter on this page and it will update it on the main newsletters' page. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia:WikiProject Powderfinger/Outreach/Newsletter/Current

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Powderfinger 

message: Hello prolific Powderfinger fans. Per last year, we are now closing in on another milestone for AUS, with 178 current GAs. Well, since this topic participated immensely during the GA drive last year, this is another rallying cry to WP:AWNB/A. YellowMonkey  (bananabucket) 04:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:AUS]] 200 GA drive 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, many wikiproject topics will be effected.
The two opposing positions which have the most support is:  
# supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
# opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect
Comments are welcome.  Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment. 
Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help. 
===Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people===
;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  05:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment on Biographies of living people

message: ;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  05:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

message: Okip   00:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced living people articles bot

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Powderfinger articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powderfinger articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of :Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject cleanup listing 

message: An article that you have been involved in editing, Pick Up the Pace has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the  discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 03:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAR Pick Up the Pace 

message: I have nominated Powderfinger for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. YuMaNuMa  Contrib  10:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powderfinger FAR 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Our first Australian conference for Wikipedians/Wikimedians will be held 3-5 October 2015. Organised by Wikimedia Australia, there will be a 2-day conference (Saturday 3 October and Sunday 4 October) with an optional 3rd day (Monday 5 October) for specialist topics (unconference discussions, training sessions, etc). The venue is the State Library of Queensland in Brisbane. So put those dates in your diary! Note: Monday is a public holiday is some states but not others. Read about it here: WikiConference Australia 2015
As part of that page, there are now sections for you to:
* indicate your interest in possibly attending the conference (this is not a binding commitment, of course) 
* add suggestions for topics to include in the conference: what you would like to hear/discuss (again, there is no commit to you presenting/organising that topic, although it’s great if you are willing to do so), or indicate your enthusiasm for any existing topic on the list by adding a note of support underneath it
 
It would really help our planning if you could let us know about possible attendance and the kind of topics that would make you want to come. If you don’t want to express your views on-wiki, please email me at kerry.raymond@wikimedia.org.au or committee@wikimedia.org.au 
We are hoping to have travel subsidies available to assist active Australasian Wikipedians to attend the conference, although we are not currently in a position to provide details, but be assured we are doing everything we can to make it possible for active Australian Wikipedians to come to the conference. Kerry (talk) 00:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Folks, just letting you know we will not be proceeding with Wikiconference Australia 2015 originally proposed for 3-5 October 2015. Thanks to those of you who expressed your support. You are free to attend the football finals instead :-) Kerry (talk) 08:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiConfererence Australia 2015 - Save the date 3-5 October 2015 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I have nominated Bernard Fanning for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 18:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR for [[Bernard Fanning]] 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources