Talk:Bokeh

message: :On the subject of European lenses, I found the Bokeh on a standard 50mm f1.8 Praktica particularly pleasing, the old M42 ones 
:80.7.74.46 (talk) 23:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the subject of European lenses 

message: I recently added this with a link to someone using a macro feature for bokeh control.
:The Sigma YS System Focusing 135mm f/2.8 also has an extra manually-moved component, intended to compensate for spherical aberration at close-focus distances. It can be re-purposed for defocus control. 
I've just found Nikon's description of their CRC close-range correction system.
It says it's tweaking astigmatism not spherical aberration. Sigma might be different ? I'll delete 'spherical'.
I'm not sure how astigmatism (or coma) affects bokeh ...
Although the results are convincing, it is maybe too close to OR for Wikipedia - feel free to delete it, but please leave this section here for interest, and to help bokeh-hunters. Thanks.
--195.137.93.171 (talk) 04:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aberration at close-focus distances - spherical or astigmatism ? 

message: I think this link is very useful to the article, as it gives the user a visual representation of the amount of background blur wich can be achieved by a certain lens. Since I developed the tool myself I cannot add the link myself, but I hope you guys will consider it.
http://howmuchblur.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johann3s (talk • contribs) 09:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  external link to howmuchblur.com 

message: I do not understand why the link was removed this time. Smial wrote: "Bokeh cannot be simulated in this manner, because it depends strongly on lens construction. Nice game." The bokeh of course depends on specific lens construction, but the difference is not so big to discard bokeh simulation completly. There is even a whole paragraph in the article about bokeh emulation. I beleive the linked page is a great example of simulating different types of bokeh. What are you trying to say by "Nice game."? 89.72.112.215 (talk) 19:04, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't answer for Smial, but I think it would be a lot more useful if it had a way to simulate specular highlights. At the moment, it only implements blur with moderate dynamic range. Btw, "brunette" refers to hair colour, not skin. Samsara (FA • FP) 00:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to dofsimulator.net 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bokeh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090730073705/http://web.media.mit.edu//~ankit//bokode// to http://web.media.mit.edu/~ankit/bokode/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Katherine Maher image is an excellent example of 'swirly' bokeh. However there is an awkward appearance of a Wikipedia conflict of interest by using an image of the WMF Executive Director in random articles. I suggest it be replaced, if someone can find an equally excellent replacement. Do not replace it with an inferior image though. The image value itself takes precedence over a slim chance that someone will notice the connection, and think it was used because of that connection. And to be clear, I'm not accusing anyone of impropriety. It really is an excellent example image. Alsee (talk) 21:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Katherine Maher 

message: Maybe this could be useful as a source or as an example? BOKEH? NOT BOKEH - How do you say 'bokeh'? – Photogearnews on Youtube Interesting part starts at 1:11. --El Grafo (talk) 09:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation again 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bokeh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924193620/http://web.media.mit.edu/~ankit/id/ to http://web.media.mit.edu/~ankit/id/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Portrait mode. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 20#Portrait mode until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Captain Galaxy (talk) 11:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Portrait mode" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: And I wish to keep it, but please put it below the fold. There's no way the intro section can house all that fluff; Five entire paragraphs' worth of Japanese language lessons with no explanation of what bokeh actually is, until the sixth.
Also, please employ transliteration or latinize or how do you say... Spell out each word with letters from the latin alphabet, not just with Japanese kanji/symbols. We can't all read those (yet!?) Thanks, •ː• 3ICE •ː• 04:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology's great and all...