lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:El Cóndor Pasa (song)

message: As this is the English edition of Wikipedia, would someone care to translate the extensive quote from Robles Godoy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stoic Squirrel (talk • contribs) 01:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have translated the quote. I am a bit worried now that it does not add any new information as it says mostly the same as the body of the text.85.1.58.204 (talk) 16:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote from Robles Godoy

message: I Deleted the infobox for the Simon and Garfunkel single. This article is about the song, not about this particular cover of it, and that infobox give that one cover excessive emphasis, and kind of dominates the page.--Ericjs (talk) 01:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon and Garfunkel single infobox 

message: The link to English people in the phrase "This song is known in English people due to the 1970 cover by Simon & Garfunkel" needs to be addressed for syntax and accuray. Simon and Garfunkel were from the United States, not England. O0drogue0o (talk) 18:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad construction 

message: The infobox for their single has Simon & Garfunkel featuring Los Incas singles chronology but Los Incas aren’t featured on the preceding and succeeding singles. Can this be fixed? —143.104.239.133 (talk) 13:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon & Garfunkel singles chronology
Talk:Freel Peak

message: The text of the article states one number and the infobox a different number...?Marcia Wright (talk) 04:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch: the infobox has the elevation from the NGS, which is more up-to-date than the USGS elevation. I reconciled the two numbers. hike395 (talk) 06:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different elevation numbers
Talk:Computer Games (song)

message: Huh? The article says the single was released in 1981, then goes on to say it was released in Australia & New Zealand in 1979. So... was it released in Europe in 1981? The USSR? Released on CD in 1981?  --59.167.127.234 (talk) 15:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date

message: This database reports the air date was the April 19th 1980:
http://baseportal.com/cgi-bin/baseportal.pl?htx=/webgirl/main&cmd=list&range=0,8&Year~=1980&cmd=all&Id=4
However, the Australian ABC television show Rage  replayed the awards on January 11th 2008 and identified it as April 13th 1980: http://www.abc.net.au/rage/archive/s2462274.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.127.234 (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: TV Hits/Countdown Awards Date

message: I cannot find where the song made #2 in Canada, nor any ranking. . The only entry is for the album 'Graffiti Crimes', which reached #87.  AMCKen (talk) 04:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen a couple of books and articles claiming that "Computer Games" was a #2 single in Canada, but I must admit I haven't been able to find a primary Canadian source to corroborate that either. Muzilon (talk) 03:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've removed the claim per AMCKen's assertion (and my having just looked now) that RPM has no evidence of the song charting in Canada. The website being used looked like a fan-compiled website of New Zealand music artist history anyway. Ss112 03:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Charts Canada
Talk:Soul2Soul Tour

message: See Talk:Soul2Soul II Tour, as Alkclark did the same thing here.  My same arguments against this massive reduction there (never responded to by Alkclark) apply here as well.  I have kept Alkclark's set list and tour dates section changes and restored everything else.  Alkclark is also a confirmed sockpuppeteer, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Alkclark.  Wasted Time R (talk) 04:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive removal of tour and show description
Talk:Organistrum

message: I created this stub to work on a full article on the organistrum. Information specific to the organistrum should go here rather than on the general hurdy gurdy page. My hope is that others will help fill this article in based on the admittedly incomplete stub I have supplied.
-Fenevad (talk) 19:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: Were there not drone strings no the organistrum?  Why is this issue not even addressed in the current version of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Drone]]?
Talk:Summerside, Prince Edward Island

message: Summerside, Prince Edward Island (incorporated municipality - see http://www.gov.pe.ca/where.php3?city=Summerside) is the least ambiguous use of the term (compare unincorporated geographical area in Summerside, Newfoundland and Labrador, sub-division in Summerside (Edmonton)) and represents the majority of incoming links. Current page of Summerside is disambiguation content and should be moved to Summerside (disambiguation).
Half Silvered (talk) 03:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to Rename and Disambiguate Summerside 
Talk:German order of battle for the invasion of Poland

message: 85.224.211.226 (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as DAB. --dashiellx (talk) 15:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:University Radio Essex

message: Not sure why this is disputed -- it has own industry awards (as stated in article), and was one of the first university radio stations to broadcast freely (i.e. not just via induction loops), again as stated in the article. I don't disagree that the article needs some major copy editing to break it into more logical sections; but this doesn't make the subject notable. -- Ratarsed (talk) 19:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because there are no references or citations to demonstrate the notability. In fact there are none at all. Any and all statements of fact need references to back them up. --WebHamster 21:27, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: It appears University Radio Essex and Red - 1404 AM are the same radio station / same organisation.
Do these two articles need merging? Maybe someone with better knowledge can provide a more considered answer.
Philedmondsuk (talk) 15:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with RED_-_1404_AM 
Talk:Corby Davidson

message: To the speedy deletion, I don't think I understand how Davidson's notoriety is different than any well known public personality on a radio station in a top 10 market. Speaking to the Dallas market, you could say the same of  Mark Davis from WBAP or  Kevin McCarthy.
Please explain. It would seem to me that any regularly prominent public figures should be noted in Wikipedia but I don't set the rules obviously. 
Mhudson3 (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Krogh's principle

message: While the principle that is the subject of this article is "properly" attributed to Krogh, the article should nonetheless address itself to the reaal provenance.  The key issue in its history is not the fame of the principle but its origination.  Claude Bernard should be given credit here, as Krogh's words seem almost plagiarised from his, rather than included as a postscript.  
It was clear from the article's own account that the History section was incorrect and so I have edited it to make it internally consistent. 
I did not have time to rewrite the references in the proper wiki form, and nor did I delete anything of consequence although it seems to me the biog detaiol on Krogh re his Nobel Proze is irrelevant to the article and could be deleted.  LookingGlass (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite "History of Victors
Talk:Jean Heller

message: Monozygotic (talk) 00:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of Brotherhood episodes

message: I'd like to propose we move the DVD information to below the episode listing. For one, a part from the LOE pages, it's generally standard practice among TV and Film articles to put DVD info last. This is a List of Episodes page, and not a List of DVDs page, so the first thing a reader should see should be the episodes. It's also a bit misleading to have it under "Series overview" (or something similar), because it isn't an overview or a summary. It's just a table for the DVD releases. I recently adjusted List of Smallville episodes to reflect that, moving the DVD info below the episodes under the new header of "Home video release", which is more appropriate given what it actually is. This isn't a major change, but I'd rather come to the talk pages of all the relevant LOE pages first. 
P.S. I removed the image from the lead, as these have never passed WP:FUC. I'm not sure if it was there when the FLC took place or not, but someone should have mentioned that it was decided a long time ago that images for LOE pages don't meet the fair-use criteria.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 12:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section move 
Talk:Debris flow

message: Idisagree as well. The first comment is the correct one, they shouldn't be merged because even if similar, mud flows and lahars (for example) are essentially composed by thin particles (mud and silt), whereas débris flows carry cm size particles to big metric boulders.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.223.103.42 (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

message: The article Buoyant flows is an orphan and there are no mentions of the subject on Wikipedia pages. It is about a phenomenon in two-phase debris flows, so it would probably be better merged into this article. That would benefit this article as well, since it doesn't discuss of two-phase flows in any detail. RockMagnetist (talk) 17:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Platypus Trophy

message: According to this article, the trophy now resides in a case at a trophy shop in Eugene(?!?), despite the Beavs victory in 2007. Since the shop will no doubt be renovated and the trophy lost behind a wall for another 50 years, any Eugeniacs want to go snap a photo? (Warning: asking to take a photo of a trophy is a well-known ruse for stealing it.) --Esprqii (talk) 00:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trophy picture

message: I don't understand why no one seems to care about the trophy anymore.  The platypus is the perfect combo of both schools' mascots, and most serious rivalries have a trophy of some sort. --Bufori (talk) 06:11, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is interesting, especially given the "stolen trophy" motif that usually heightens the importance of the trophy. Definitely incorporate the source you cited into the article. --Esprqii (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambivalence
Talk:Operation U-Go

message: Why the name "U-Go"? What does it mean? Languagehat (talk) 15:24, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: At the top of the article and in the info box it states that the japanese losses were 30,502 dead and 23,003 hospitalized. However under "Impact" it lists 13,376 dead for the japanese. I understand sometimes these numbers can be difficult to estimate and vary across sources, but I think in this case given that the allied casualties match up, those two present vastly different impacts for someone reading about this theatre. One, a pyrrhic victory for the allies, and another an overwhealming victory. Is there a way to resolve this sort of thing?RugnirViking (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, if you can get your hands on the cited sources and can confirm that they are both talking about comparable periods and causes, I'd suggest dealing with it by comparing and contrasting the different figures in the body of the article, then adjusting the infobox to display a range that incorporates the two figures (assuming the sources are reliable). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Casualty Numbers
Talk:Type 53 torpedo

message: 53-65 torpedo is a subtype of the Type 53 torpedo. At least, the "53-66" article should be renamed "Type 53-65 torpedo", as per SOP. But it could also become a section here, and I think it should do so, because the main Type 53 article gives not enough information. Adding the 53-65 data will give the reader a better idea of what we're dealing with here, especially since in how far other models diverge from the 53-65's parameters is outlined already. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 22:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I have some confusion here I want to clarify. I was the original writer of the 53-65 torpedo page and since there are 65mm torpedoes in the Russian navy, does the '65' in 53-65 signify that it can fit in both 53mm tubes and 65mm tubes or that the torpedo was first put into service in 1965? Either way, I feel like I want to clarify with a better source such as Jane's or something before the merge.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chazly413 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 65 refers to year of introduction 12.172.184.210 (talk) 06:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Perhaps

message: The "type" is actually "Type 65".... 
"53" refers to the general class of 53-cm torpedoes-- which includes most Soviet/Russian torpedoes... 
So 53-65 means "53-cm, Type 65"...
WAT (former US submarine officer, former head of US undersea intelligence)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wathornton (talk • contribs) 18:18, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: 65 refers to year of introduction 12.172.184.210 (talk) 06:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: =====NO=====
Talk:List of Cuban track and field athletes

message: Just started this article.  It will become a comprehensive list of athletes from cuba .  Similiar to this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Puerto_Rican_athletes
CubanoDios (talk) 20:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is in fact a category, not a list. See WP:CAT. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shu Lea Cheang

message: I'm working on this article so please don't delete it without talking to me first. Shu Lea Cheang is a very well known Digital Media Artist. She has work in the Guggenheim and other prestigious locations. She also has been recognized by her peers and has her "Brandon" piece published in a book called Digital Media Art by Mark Tribe published by Taschen. Jlustig77 (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gary F. Longman Memorial Trophy

message: The name of the article is currently Gary F. Longman Memorial Trophy, but was this trophy's name that or instead Garry F. Longman Memorial Trophy? If Hockeydb.com, Eliteprospects.com and Legendsofhockey.net have it correct, it might be the latter. ,,n (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the trophy
Talk:Jefferson fracture

message: Is it still a stub?  I say borderline. WLU (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: An x-ray, CT or MRI of an actual JF would be great, but I be that'll be hard to find.  WLU (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Bridge River Ash

message: Really?  But what about the Tseax River Cone/Aiyansh Volcano, which wsurely has erupted since; or is it not "major"?  Also what about even the Bridge River Cones, with 1500BP or maybe that was only a venting or single flow, not amajor eruption.  Just wanted to check on the "most recent" thing; I would have thought Tseax/Aiyansh was.Skookum1 (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It says the most recent major eruption. I know the others are more recent but those eruptions were smaller in volume not reaching VEI-5 on the Volcanic Explosivity Index. So more recent eruptions in British Columbia would have a smaller volume than Meager's eruption. Black Tusk 15:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, I guess I was thinking two villages destroyed was fairly major, plus a highly visible lava flow...but interms of ejecta/explosive power it's hard to beat the Cascade Volcanoes anyway, huh?  I think in this article it might help to say, because of the similar name, that the Bridge River Ash isn't from the Bridge River Cones?Skookum1 (talk) 05:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you could say the Tseax eruption would have been a major lava flow eruption since it's 22.5 km long and killed about 2000 people and destroyed two villages, but compairing that to the largest eruptions on Earth it would be rather small. I think it would be a good idea to describe the Bridge River Ash isn't from the Bridge River Cones. However, I don't know why it's called the Bridge River Ash; discoverd at the Bridge River maybe? Black Tusk 06:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's thrughut the upper Valley andals the lwer (0 key nt wrking grrr), ie bth sides ff th Shulaps Range; whle area gne ver with fine t00th c0mb by ge0lgsts because f gld.....guess I'l get that key fixed huh?Skookum1 (talk) 06:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Type English words lol. Perhaps the volcanic ash at the Bridge River should be added to the article. I don't know the Bridge River geology that well, but I found out that the Bridge River Ash fans out east-northeasterly as far as westernmost Alberta in the vicinity of the North Saskatchewan River. The North Saskatchewan River photo looks like it has some of the Bridge River Ash. Black Tusk 20:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Meager most recent?
Template talk:Washington Nationals

message: It seems inappropriate to have Montreal Expos and Washington Nationals at equal billing in this template.  This clashes with all other current MLB navboxes.  The fact that the move only occurred three years ago does not make this a special case.  Either it needs to go the way of Texas Rangers, Minnesota Twins, Baltimore Orioles, Milwaukee Brewers et al., and just list its former incarnation in the table, or the navbox should be split in two: one for the current franchise, and another for the defunct Expos.  --Xyzzyva (talk) 19:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to be bold and begin a split of navboxes by creating Template:Montreal Expos.  I have not yet tried to replace the Nationals box with it on the Expos-related pages.  I wanted to get more consensus before that.  Once that is complete, the Nationals box could be trimmed down to DC-only stuff, if we want.  --Xyzzyva (talk) 23:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Looks good to me. Skeezix1000 (talk) 11:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Maybe not, but you could argue that his one season with the Nats was better than Dunn's or Willingham's.  The real problem is that the Nats (leaving aside the franchise's Montreal era) don't have enough history to make a decent list of important figures.  My guess is that 30 years from now, Zimmerman is the only name that would still appear on the list.  I don't really have an opinion on whether Soriano should be kept or deleted.  The only name I can think of that perhaps should be added as a replacement is Riggleman. BRMo (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expos 

message: I think that number 42, as in the retired number section, should be linked to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Nationals#Retired_numbers and not to the regular Jackie Robinson page. That page has nothing to do with the Nats, while the Washington Nationals section on the wiki is related to the Nats and gives more specific reasons why it is retired. --Il Maravilla (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number 42, retired number 

message: Hi, my edit just got rolled back. Reason given was it had "overlinked and insufficiently related articles". What does overlinked mean? What does insufficiently related mean? There are no game-related (like, happened in a baseball game) lore items on this template. Most other teams (or maybe all? hard to keep track but I looked at all 29 to get a sense for what these look like generally) have them.
I can cite similar examples in other teams' templates if necessary. Bringlebrangle (talk) 15:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture and Lore
Talk:5-HT6 receptor

message: "Additionally, it can be inferred that 5-HT6 activation likely plays a major role in the therapeutic benefits of serotonergic antidepressants like the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)." But also on their side effects ...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabauz (talk • contribs) 23:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:5-HT7 receptor

message: "The 5-HT7 receptor plays a role in smooth muscle relaxation within the vasculature and in the gastrointestinal tract.[1]... The 5-HT7 receptor is involved in thermoregulation, circadian rhythm, learning and memory, and sleep. "
How is the effect of this receptor when agonized or antagonized. Smooth muscle is relaxed when receptor is agonized or antagonized? Anybody knows it? And the same i wanna know when it comes about termoregulation, memory etc. 
Im takins amisulpride 50-100mg. This drug antagonize 5ht7a. I have no problem sleeping, learning and good memory. So probalby antagonizm of 5ht7a improve these things. 
I also have problems with cold hands (shrinked vessels) especiali in the mornings and gastrointestinal tract. It could be becouse of i am nervous, anxiety, depresed etc but im knot sure of amisulpride's involvment at this. Recently i also have a little bit elevated body temperature for long time  (sometime is normal somethimes not). And im knot sure if it is some kind of infections or maybe amisulpiride and it's 5ht7a antagonism...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.241.248.66 (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to Wikipedia! Please note that we cannot offer medical advice here. Your first questions (regarding activation / antagonism of the receptor) could probably be asked at , but also there specific medical advice is off-topic. Please discuss your specific case and side effects with a doctor. MichaK (talk) 17:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Following the work of Thomas Ray I am intrigued by the effects the 5-HT7 receptor is supposed to have: https://transformpress.com/images/Downloads/S02Methods.pdf.
I am wondering why I don't see anything about this research on this page. Is it because these effects are still deemed to speculative?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.251.116.230 (talk) 11:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why don't I see anything about the affinity this receptor has for psychedelic compounds?
Talk:Alice Sinclair

message: I will add more to this page soon. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 16:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More prose et cetera

message: all external links are now dead. --82.33.53.29 (talk) 02:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead links
Talk:M. Rickert

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 11:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography