Talk:Caribou Coffee

message: I don't think that this article should be a stub, but I don't know how to change it into a normal article.--Daffy100 23:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to work on this article and get it out of stub.--phenzTalk 04:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: What is your message in your ad, the women and two Caribou. What message are you sending, that will catch the attention of potential customers.
Thanks Steve131.187.253.130 13:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertizement 

message: :Image:Caribou.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Caribou.gif

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here  -- TinucherianBot (talk) 08:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD]] Tagging

message: I just removed this because it was unsourced and did not make clear what Caribou Coffee had done that was actually controversial or who found it so.  If there are sources showing notable commentators believe there is something sinister about Caribou Coffee's ownership - or that the actions of owners have drawn significant controversy to the company then we should reinstate it - rewritten and properly verified.  I also think - given the lack of other sources the snopes link from the external links section should probably go.  Without other coverage it doesn't that seem justified. -- SiobhanHansa 18:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 

message: Why are we mentioning a particular line of the "philosophy" of the majority stake holders?  In what way does its inclusion conform to Wikipedia's due weight requirement for a neutral point of view?  Are there significant actions the comapny has taken because of this philosophy?  Is the issue considered significant in the business community?  We need reliable sources that show this significance before writing about it like this.  The philosophies of most major investors are not selectively quoted in most business articles here.  -- SiobhanHansa 18:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ownership

message: Why is the Headquarters listed as Minneapolis, Minnesota? It really is in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. and I would know because I actually live there. Alec92 (talk) 02:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headquarters 

message: Someone should add a section about Caribou's partnership with Coca-cola in distributed canned iced coffee drinks. I would, but I'm no good at writing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.85.193.111 (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It'd also be nice to add something about Caribou's recent partnership with Project 7, selling items such as gum, mints and water with over half the proceeds going to charities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiwisoup (talk • contribs) 07:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partnership with Coca-cola

message: Someone's been adding content to this page using marketing language. The term "handcrafted oatmeal" stuck out as marketing speak. I'm not sure if this type of language is descriptive and encyclopedic, or simply marketing buzzwords, else I'd be bold.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyrogen (talk • contribs) 05:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I last visited this page, the article took a sharp turn toward sounding like an advertisement and some of the criticisms about investors and rainforest alliance were removed. Kiwisoup (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing Language 

message: A group of us were looking to make some changes to page. We were hoping to just to update the page with information about how the beans are rainforest alliance, talk about Amy's Blend and how the company is involved with fighting breast cancer. We also wanted to update the information about who currently owns the company and the recent store closings.We were also hoping to update the lead. Also think that the structure of the article needs to be redone. More sections need to be added for this additional information. I would love some feedback! (Gjohnson33 (talk) 16:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Feedback! Sure, let's make some changes and make the article better.  I will caution, however, on a couple of points.  First, don't go in all guns blazing, make radical changes, and maintain them.  this essay has some excellent suggestions about the process to use ~ effectively, it is make a change, if someone disputes it or reverts it, then discuss it here ~ and many or most editors expect the process to be used.  Second, i notice you say "[w]e" and "[a] group of us"; that sounds as though it could be one or more people with a conflict of interest (we say COI for short ~ we love abbreviations!), i.e., someone with a financial or other interest in the success or otherwise of Caribou Coffee.  If that is the case (and i quite recognise it may not be), i suggest you adhere to the recommendations/requirements you can find at COI ~ effectively, they are that you make suggestions on the talk page (here) and let other editors make the actual changes as they see fit.  This page is now on my watchlist, so i'll see if you make changes here, and i'll drop by to have a look and see if i can help. Cheers, LindsayHello 08:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, one more thing that i meant to add.  Your use of the plural (we and us) ~ please be aware that an account with Wikipedia is only for the use of one person; if there are several of you, you each need your own accounts to edit with. WP:ACCOUNT has some links and information about accounts. Cheers, LindsayHello 09:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

text: I don't support these proposed changes. BlueSalix (talk) 03:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Changes for the page

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Caribou Coffee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061017114933/http://www.cariboucoffee.com/aboutus/ownership.asp to http://www.cariboucoffee.com/aboutus/ownership.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615220426/http://www.arcapita.com:80/corporate/current/current-all.html to http://www.arcapita.com/corporate/current/current-all.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified