Talk:User experience

message: The intro of any Wikipedia article should start with the most general and simplest definition.
The current one is still a confusing jumble, but ends with a fairly useful simplification.
Here is an improved version of that to start the intro with. Clearer? Aspects like emotion and attitude are just two of many included in what follows.
User experience (UX) is a person's experience of and interaction with a particular product, system or service. It includes etc... Majvr (talk) 21:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Summarizing (or even quoting) from at least one authoritative source is essential. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 21:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

text: That's it. OK? Majvr (talk) 11:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. Why not reference the 2019 version? --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro still confusing and unclear - A suggestion 

message: *  - «Undid revision 1063969079 by Alexander Davronov talk) reverted addition with multiple errors» 
:  What errors? Why not to fix them first?
AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 23:09, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I was the second person to revert that addition. It isn't the responsibility of other editors to fix mistakes you add if you repeatedly add them. It might be better if you start a discussion on this talk page with the additions you want to make so these errors can be worked through before they are in the article. The issues were mainly grammatical and style errors, as the previous editor who reverted your addition noted. --Cerebral726 (talk) 13:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Are you going to ignore my question above? You seen WP:FIXFIRST? ← This justifies nothing. The previous editor was banned because he was a long term abuser nicknamed as WP:BKFIP and whose edits weren't genuinely constructive. He basically made spurious and baseless accusations against me in an unrelated article about "mistakes" with the same nonsential rhetoric about "start on talk page". That's not how it works here. You also should be aware that the text I've added in fact, only partially mine. I've copied it from here: [10:52, September 19, 2021]. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  First off, you should try to be a little less incendiary with your approach to communicating with another editor, I am not acting in a way intended to upset you. I reverted the addition because the mistakes were not minor. I found the addition difficult to understand as it was written. I am not trying to disparage your addition, it is clear you are acting in good faith, but there are numerous grammatical and content errors. Regardless of why the other person was reverting your addition, I saw it as a valid removal. I am adding back in your addition with several fixes. --Cerebral726 (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine. Regards. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 20:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developer experience 

message: Why is there no relationship between this page and the customer experience wikipedia page? The customer experience page has a section on user experience but doesn't point to this article. In fact, the customer experience article has a huge warning about its quality. I suspect some of those arguments apply to this page as well. Is it worth reconciling these two pages? 2A01:4B00:AD02:DB00:E553:6AC7:5BAA:66FB (talk) 22:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation with the customer experience wikipedia page 

message: — Assignment last updated by Zefeng jing (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu