lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shi'a view of Fatimah

message: Attacking the House of Fatimah (AS) --Striver 20:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: "According to Shi'a and non-Muslim scholars, Fatima Zahra was Muhammad's only daughter."
I do not know about non-Muslim scholars, but shi'a do not believe that Fatima was The Prophet's only daughter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reza mirhosseini (talk • contribs) 18:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This phrase is absolutely wrong
Talk:Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale

message: I'll fix it to be more complete and wikified, and find a stub —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon.macuser (talk • contribs) 22:26, 29 October 2006
:OK, I've changed it to a proposed deletion which will give you time to improve the article. It looks better without the link to only one site of thousands which offer the test! Bubba hotep 21:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'm not even going to do that. It is a valid concept and hasn't yet got an article, so it's fine by me. Just keep the specific links out of it. ;) Bubba hotep 21:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Ducommun

message: I've nominated this article to be checked for POV. Particularly in the second half of the article, the text is very promotional, not objective, and it omitted important (yet controversial) elements of the company's history, such as the Boeing dispute that I added.
Aaron Ray (talk) 05:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV check nomination 

message: In 2009 - 2010 three B737-700 NG planes, Turkish Airlines Flight 1951, American Airlines Flight 331, and AIRES Flight 8250 broke apart during hard landings.  In each case, the fuselage broke apart into three pieces with the structural failure occurring at the same point of assembly where the Ducommon-fabricated  chords (ribs) were joined. Ducommon's fabrication methods were reviewed by Boeing inspectors who were later fired by Boeing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dR5QIPxfHoE#t=787 Santamoly (talk) 06:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  737NG Structural Failures
Talk:Michael J. Kennedy (politician)

message: I created the article because a) he was an elected official on a national level, so he's inherently notable (which would be true no matter what country he came from), and b) he was already linked from half a dozen pages - everything from Tammany Hall to Eastern Airlines Flight 537. I don't live in the US so I don't have access to a lot of the resources an American editor would. Edit to add: The only information I've added is from his Congressional biography. If there's information from somewhere else that can be added, it should be. He was a Tammany Hall leader (and I don't know what that means), so there must be some good sources for information available. --Charlene 21:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Portal talk:Uruguay

message: Nice to see a portal on Uruguay being set up. I've been doing a little bit of work on the Latin American portal recently, which unfortunately doesn't currently have a regular maintainer, and I'm also active on the Argentine portal. (I'm not looking for any more work though - my home is New Zealand and I am primarily responsible for the New Zealand and Oceania portals.) Once this portal is fully constructed (which I consider to be the case once all sections of it are populated), then feel free to add it to the list of Other Portals at the bottom of the Latin America portal page, or drop me a note and I'll add it for you.-gadfium 03:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome

message: I filled in the one section on the portal for "Article that Need attention" and made a hierarchy for filling it in with Articles. I added two Articles that I noticed need work. Please help to add other articles to it. Let me know and I'd be happy to help with it. Also, I notice the WIKI side in spanish has many articles that are quite good. Maybe we could put some of them on the translation request side. Thoughts? Neagley (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles that need Attention 

message: WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.
As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals.  So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely,      — The Transhumanist    07:49, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: The following updates occurred to the Uruguay portal in March 2020. North America1000 12:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 portal updates
Talk:Israeli Intelligence Community

message: Is there really an entity 'Israeli Intelligence Community' (IIC)?  A simple search on the term shows that it is almost always merely a description (uncapitalised): 'Israeli intelligence community'.  Since this article has no references it is hard to ascertain.  (I am not expert in this area.)
Earthlyreason (talk) 18:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a request for more inline citations, given that there are two references listed as further reading. Somers-all-the-time (talk) 16:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of this term
Talk:Ancient Greek boxing

message: But in the talk page original research isn't allowed anyway if I remember my wikipedia rules right.  I need to point something out about the rules; in ancient Greek Boxing, excessive backpedaling (e.g. being a coward) was punishable by execution.  Please look this up yourself in a College or University library.  Circling and keeping your distance were allowed, if I recall correctly, but not excessive "running."
96.18.165.29 (talk)stardingo747  —Preceding undated comment added 23:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wish I Had The Source...
Talk:Transitional National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of the Congo

message: Keep this historic record and replace this info with new info? AndrewRT - Talk 21:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Has been done. —Nightstallion (?) 21:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: I am not sure how or where to add this info, but all the pages on the National Assembly will have to be modified to show that there is a new Speaker of the National Assembly (Vital Kamhere), a new deputy speaker (Christophe Lutundula), etc. Plus there is the need to detail a bit more what the National Assembly does/is supposed to do. In short, some serious updating.
Themalau 11:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do this at National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of the Congo rather than here and keep this as a historical record of the old assembly. AndrewRT(Talk) 17:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New developments
Talk:Waxwork (film)

message: What are the differences between the R-Rated and Unrated versions?? I want specifics. Mr. Brigg's Ink 00:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unrated!!

message: I see you disapprove, how can I improve? Mr. Brigg's Ink 01:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As one suggestion, the plot description is very long, convuluted, confusing and not entirely in in-universe perspective. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 02:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My writing style

message: In the end of the film there was the soundtrack of "It's My Party" by Lesley Gore. That was a nice contrast.--80.141.214.190 (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's my party
Talk:Dulwich Prep London

message: Victuallers 14:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

message: There is another DCPS in Cranbrook . Although it appears to go by the name Dulwich Preparatory School, it still uses the initials DCPS. Any clarification of the relationship between these two schools would be a useful addition. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does it say children and not boys? Is the school now co-ed??? 87.194.35.230 18:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Girls]] 
Talk:Iron Eagle

message: During the rescue Doug says he has two sidewinders left. After he shoots down the leader he tells his dad he only has 30 rounds left.
I removed this part because it didn't flow well with the section it was in (well, not as well as anything flows in that section), and because the previous point about changing weapons loadouts and continuity errors covers this without going into excessive trivia.  Of course, feel free to debate the point, argue, and/or call me names as you see fit if you disagree (hell, do it if you think it's fun).--Raguleader 01:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Roger dodger, Raguleader. Well done. Over and out. — Smuckola(talk) 08:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidewinders 

message: He also fires an AGM-65 Maverick missile while on the ground, which is not possible in real life - the F-16's weapon system is inhibited by a pressure sensor in the nosegear.
I removed this part because it simply isn't true.  It is possible to release a munition from an F-16 while on the groud.  There is a switch called Ground Jettison Enable that is mainly used for operational checks, but if left in the wrong position, may cause firing while the aircraft is on the ground.  It has happened before, in fact.---edited by guest,  22:10, 2 September 2007  (EST) Interesting. BUT - is knowledge and training about the Ground Jettison Enable provided to pilots - or perhaps only personnel trained on loading and unloading weapons? Next I believe when the AGM-65 is fired/  released if first drop for about a second then the missile's rocket ignites. Unknown What would really occur if released on the group - would something in the missile prevent the rocket from igniting. Ok - Does the pressure sensor also prevent firing the gun? if not - what would the effective range be? Wfoj3 (talk) 00:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  F-16 Weight on Wheels sensor 

message: Can we have some agreement on which planes were used for the enemy please. As of 18/12/07 it seems that this is undecided. -- 129.11.76.216 (talk) 09:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enemy Aircraft 

message: The plot to Brians book was from Iron Eagle III not Iron Eagle  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.132.206.4 (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Guy
Talk:List of companies of Israel

message: IMHO, this list should only contain notable firms, that ought to have a wikipedia article. So articles deleted as being non-notable should not have an entry here. Please read: Wikipedia is not a directory. Thanks. --Edcolins 23:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not WP policy. Pleae read :WP:LISTV. Cleanup should always warranted, but if a company is verifiable, then it's list material. especially when it not might be notable for its own article. --Shuki 00:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your message. IMHO, the list should include a criteria for inclusion. It doesn't. See Always include criteria. --Edcolins 21:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree completely. --Shuki 16:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

text: IMO, the cleanup was definitely not the way to go. The result is a redundant article. The article is problematic. Many companies are NN, but most others are well known. I suggest merely sampling a few articles here: :Category:Lists of companies by country and tell if the Israeli article is any different. --Shuki 21:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They're all pretty bad, with a few exceptions. List of Singapore companies is well maintained. List of Canadian companies is what I would describe as the minimum standard. It is not our function to list every single company, and WP:Verifiability still applies to lists. Please reconsider your revert in accordance with our policies. Marasmusine 21:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Like I said, most companies are N and very verifiable. This list is not one of my priorities right now, but this does not warrant a mass blanking. Maybe all the lists should be afd? But as long as they are still here, I don't see why the Israeli article should be singled out. --Shuki 23:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't singled it out, I'm working my way though a lot of them. The Israeli list is in a particularly appalling state though. If a company is both verifiable and notable, a stub article can be made for it with references and assertion of notability and then added to this list. An AfD isn't necessary if the unverified material is removed. At the moment, it reads like a business directory rather than a navigation tool. Marasmusine 08:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable firms - cleanup needed
Talk:Bud Yorkin

message: Moving all this:
:Credited as co-executive producer of Blade Runner on IMDB  , in the documentary "On the edge of Blade Runner" he is also quoted as "Co-financier". 
:==External Links==
:IMDB
:Allmovie
:Famouswhy
The "external links" were added in an inappropriate place, after the group template, and are not properly formatted (the link should describe what the target website has that is relevant to this article).  The other paragraph stinks of "IMDB farming"; IMDB is not a valid source for citation, as IMDB does not screen its submissions and does not require its submitters to provide a valid third-party source to support the submissions.  The passage is also ungrammatical and improperly formatted.
If someone wants to correct these errors, and assuming that any of it is relevant and true, please do so and return the information to the article. 98.211.124.111 (talk) 14:28, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving here from article
Talk:Union for the Republic – National Movement

message: The current version does not read like an encyclopedia article about this political party. I will take out all references to events that have no connection to the article name.AndrewRT - Talk 21:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Union for for the Republic - National Movement. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 00:28, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Union for for the Republic - National Movement" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:A Twisted Christmas

message: I'd like to get this into the article without violating: WP:NOR.  Reviews of the album might contain such commentary...
----
A number of songs on the album bear a resemblance to other Twisted Sister songs, and often portions of a song resemble the musical style of other heavy metal artists.   "Oh Come All Ye Faithful" is based on the melody of We're Not Gonna Take It, while "White Christmas" ends with the style of S.M.F.
"Silver Bells" opens with the style of AC/DC's "Problem Child", while "Let It Snow" starts with the melody from "Rock 'n' Roll Saviors", a song Twisted Sister played often in the club days.
----
To me, "Deck The Halls" has a definite Iron Maiden feel to the guitar, while the remainder of the songs seem like something else, I just can't pin them down. *Sparkhead 21:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's only relevant to the album, which of course this article isn't about.--71.112.10.205 08:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song Similarities 
Talk:Permanent income hypothesis

message: I can't see a single advantage of these over ordinary Latin alphabet footnotes. I would "be bold" & change them, but it would take some time. For future reference, the template used is Template:Efn-lg.
Other articles, even rather technical ones in the scope of wikiproject economics, do not use these type of notes:
* Shapley–Folkman lemma uses lowercase Latin letters
* Brander–Spencer model uses Arabic numerals
I will probably change this when I get a moment, if nobody else gets there first or objects.
=== Separate issues ===
(not sure what I'll do with these even if I had time):
1. Footnotes beta, gamma, delta, and eta all repeat the same stuff (distinction between MPC and MPS). Can those be consolidated to one footnote? Better yet, can we simply delete the later scattershot footnotes? (Why footnote MPC under Policy implications but not Empirical evidence, for example?)
2. Footnote gamma doesn't even lead to the "right thing." It's attached to APC (which is not defined anywhere, and only mentioned once, much farther down the page).
3. The table is labeled "Fig. 1". That's not ordinary style for Wikipedia. Why not just "as shown in the table below"? Is there a figure 2? What if a different figure 1 gets inserted above? The caption "Fig. 1: Analysis of consumption...." isn't typical either. Lastly, even in an academic paper (at least those publishers I know), this would be a table, not a figure. Is this perhaps a remnant of the formatting of the original source of this table?
--Officiallyover (talk) 00:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the Greek explanatory footnotes? 

message: (not sure what I'll do with these even if I had time):
1. Footnotes beta, gamma, delta, and eta all repeat the same stuff (distinction between MPC and MPS). Can those be consolidated to one footnote? Better yet, can we simply delete the later scattershot footnotes? (Why footnote MPC under Policy implications but not Empirical evidence, for example?)
2. Footnote gamma doesn't even lead to the "right thing." It's attached to APC (which is not defined anywhere, and only mentioned once, much farther down the page).
3. The table is labeled "Fig. 1". That's not ordinary style for Wikipedia. Why not just "as shown in the table below"? Is there a figure 2? What if a different figure 1 gets inserted above? The caption "Fig. 1: Analysis of consumption...." isn't typical either. Lastly, even in an academic paper (at least those publishers I know), this would be a table, not a figure. Is this perhaps a remnant of the formatting of the original source of this table?
--Officiallyover (talk) 00:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate issues
Talk:Pingali Venkayya

message: There are  issues related to the article.
"The outcome of that proposal is not known"
It's been 9 years since the state government announced it and there is no proof that he was ever nominated or considered by the Prime Minister and no process to do so. .It's time to drop that sentence, especially since there is no process; even the state that proposed it no longer exists as it was bifurcated.
"in 2011 it was proposed that he be posthumously awarded the Bharat Ratna."
Refer to  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharat_Ratna#Regulations .  
"Although there is no formal nomination process, recommendations for the award can only be made by the Prime Minister to the President with a maximum number of three nominees being awarded per year"
Thus the state suggesting his name has no particular significance. There is no evidence that the Prime Minister considered his name or forwarded to the president. Since there is no specific process, the 'proposal' has no real meaning; any person  might as well 'propose' any other person's name alive or dead with almost as much significance.
It is therefore inappropriate to retain vague and outdated information in Wikipedia and the sentence on the outcome should be deleted in timely fashion.
Barath s (talk) 13:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for Bharat Ratna 

message: I made the recent updates about Pingali Venkayya. The sources for them is the book written by his son and my grandfather happens to be his maternal nephew. Hence these are verified facts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkkishore (talk • contribs) 18:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i see that the Indian national flag creation is completely attributed to this person whereas its an evolution which many hand are involved. The articles cited are also broken .. SO i invite to have a talk on this dispute...
discussions appreciated Karthikeyan.pandian (talk) 10:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Much of this would be good for the article but we need reliable sources to verify it. Where did you get your information from? - Sitush (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reg Indian national flag creator 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machilipatnam to be inserted as a link, as its a town featured in Wikipedia.
92.99.193.82 (talk) 18:09, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Sam Sing! 08:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 August 2014 

message: English 106.66.56.243 (talk) 08:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triranga who designer
Talk:Flag of Sardinia

message: I don't really understand why the "old" flag has blindfolded heads while there are examples of XVe century heads which are not blindfolded?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niberto (talk • contribs) 09:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Blind folded

message: Please wait, I'm still working on it....Mauro Podda 22:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Please wait
Talk:Banderas monumentales

message: The biggest flag is located in Piedras Negras, Coahuila, not Monterrey. It's 60 X 34 M compared to Monterrey's 50 X 28.6 M. Could a verified user please change this info?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.145.38.3 (talk) 00:00, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest flag correction
Talk:Flag of Bonaire

message: The first sentence of the second paragraph used to read as follows:
:The triangles are separated by a white strip, inside of which is a black compass and a red six-pointed star.
I changed is to are in the final clause. The subject of the verb is "a black compass and a red six-pointed star," which is clearly a plural subject, as it has two parts, both of which are subjects of the verb.
SiBr4 reverted my change, contending, "'Is' refers to the white strip" (see the page history). This is clearly in error. The black compass and red six-pointed star are the things that are inside of the white strip (replaced by the pronoun which in the clause). "[A] white strip" is the object of the preposition by, and thus cannot be the subject of any verb.
Let me make it even more obvious. The sentence can be re-written as two sentences, without changing the meaning whatsoever, like this:
:The triangles are separated by a white strip. A black compass and a red six-pointed star are inside of the white strip.
Now, the final clause (under debate) has been converted to a simple sentence, in which the subject and verb are even more plainly apparent. This should leave absolutely no doubt for anyone with an elementary understanding of English grammar.
SiBr4, please don't make this inaccurate change again. This is a very simple grammatical issue. Identification of the subject and verb in clause is beyond debate. The subject is plural, so the verb must be plural to agree with the number of the subject. Thank you. Holy (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: My fault. If the sentence was of the form "the stripe contains a compass and a star" the verb would be singular, but of course the compass and star are the subject in this case. SiBr4 (talk) 18:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noun–verb agreement in number
Talk:Flag of the governor-general of New Zealand

message: It shouldn't be hard for someone to make an SVG of the new flag---assuming the ratio's still 1:2, everything else should be readily available! 118.90.83.164 (talk) 04:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hah, interesting comparison... it looks a bit like the President of Ireland's flag now too. --Lholden (talk) 08:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SVG of new flag