lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bell Trade Act

message: The following has been deleted from the article:
One U.S. State Department official described the law as "clearly inconsistent with the basic foreign economic policy of this country" and a betrayal of "our promise to grant the Philippines genuine independence." 
Protests throughout the Philippines denounced the Bell Trade Act. Even the reliably pro-American Philippine President Sergio Osmena called it a "curtailment of Philippine sovereignty, virtual nullification of Philippine independence." 
This amendment could be obtained only with the approval of three-quarters of the members of the House and Senate and a plebiscite. 
The denial of seats in the House to six members of the leftist Democratic Alliance and three Nacionalistas on grounds of fraud and violent campaign tactics during the April 1946 election enabled Roxas to gain legislative approval on September 18. 
The definition of three-quarters became an issue because three-quarters of the sitting members, not the full House and Senate, had approved the amendment, but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the administration's interpretation . 
In March 1947, a plebiscite on the amendment was held; only 40 percent of the electorate participated, but the majority of those approved the amendment. 
The Bell Act, particularly the parity clause, was seen by critics as an inexcusable surrender of national sovereignty. The pressure of the sugar barons, particularly those of Roxas's home region of the western Visayan Islands, and other landowner interests, however, was irresistible.
Signed: Travb (talk) 18:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted from the article

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Party rights (Philippines). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 17#Party rights (Philippines) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Party rights (Philippines)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Parity Amendment. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 17#Parity Amendment until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Parity Amendment" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Na isusulong ang pagpapatibay ng parity rights 175.176.87.36 (talk) 12:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filipino 

message: Hghlh bvv 175.176.81.80 (talk) 03:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  5b5b
Talk:Peekaboo

message: This article seems to indicate that young children are not aware that an object still exists if it's outside their vision. If you follow the link in this article to "object permanence", you'll notice that this idea is considered discredited in modern psychology. Some revisions are thus in order on this page so as not to perpetuate a discredited theory.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.216.78 (talk) 06:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Object permanence discussion out-of-date/discredited 

message: This very partial take on the general idea of peekaboo seems dubious as is.  At the minimum, it needs a clearly labeled separate section.  "According to a critical essay by X" obviously belongs with several of the statements that are inappropriate, as is, in the encyclopedia's editorial voice; for example, the encyclopedia should not be stating that the messianic age is an adult peekaboo anticipation of the off-screen, etc.  Moreover, since this section isn't about the game, the fact that an essayist has hung it on the term "peekaboo" may not make it appropriate for this article; isn't object permanence the more general article about the cognitive phenomenon, and wouldn't the section on adult "peekaboo" phenomena belong there?  Wareh 18:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peekaboo&diff=91814079&oldid=88918769 This recent edit (diff)] 

message: So how do you win?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.237.147 (talk) 18:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winning 

message: Peekaboo is also a record by marsheaux, the greek synth-pop-band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.157.40.71 (talk) 11:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record 

message: What about peek-a-boo look and similar avt. that flow around - eg:
Veronica Lake is shown when she was the "peek-a-boo look" movie star in the 1940s.
Metamorphius (talk) 22:37, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peekaboo look 

message: This article was vandalised on December 13, 2013. I have restored the entire lead para. This was made worse because ClueBot began reverting the editors who tried to fix the article. --Greenmaven (talk) 00:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing vandalism 

message: The Guardian says:
"Trump called James “racist and incompetent”, also using a nickname some observers have said may itself be a racist dog whistle.".
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/12/trump-forbes-magazine-wealthiest-people-list
Coyly, they don't say what term he used; but they link to his post on Trump Social, and apparently it's "peekaboo".
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111213800884563977
But I can't find anything else that says "peekaboo" is a racist dog whistle. Is this claim correct, and if so, why? MrDemeanour (talk) 10:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist dog whistle
Talk:Alexandre O'Neill

message: I've removed a whole chunk of information about other people which would more properly be placed in wiki pages about them, if they're notable enough to merit a page of their own. Bazj (talk) 17:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed info 

message: Removed a load of plagiarised text lifted verbatim from   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bazj (talk • contribs) 18:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
Talk:Kholop

message: The etymological part presented here is groundless. The word kholop was first mentioned in a chronicle for the year of 986. Its etymology is unclear. By one hypothesis, the word is cognate with Slavic words translated as "boy" (more specifically, adolescent male; modern Russian: хлопец (khlopets), Polish: chlopak), which is similar to the use of the English word boy as "servant".
Incorrect. Polish chłop means "farmer", not "boy" and not "servant". The given form (should be: chłopak with "Ł", not "L") is a derivative of chłop, not a basic word. There also exists another Polish derivative: chłopiec (meaning the same as chłopak, "boy"). The cited Russian word is a loanword form Polish (if it was part of inherited vocabulary, it must have sounded *kholopec (with olo)).
The Serbian word glupak and the Bulgarian word глупак (glupak) have the meaning of "simpleton, fool, blockhead". - these Serbian / Bulgarian connections are not necessary, and a similar word is common Slavic (e.g. Polish głupek, głupiec with the same meaning). Any genetic relation between chłop and głupek is virtually impossible, so the hypothesis is nothing more but an urban legend. There is no legitimation for placing such nonsenses in encyclopaedias.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.136.118.5 (talk) 16:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The etymological part
Talk:Danny Sullivan's Indy Heat

message: The statement about beating the game is somewhat misleading. The game cannot be beaten because it doesn't have an ending...it's possible (if the player keeps winning, and therefore avoids running out of lives) to play indefinitely. At the end of the season, championship prize money is awarded and the next season begins. The only reason Danny's prowess is an issue is that his skill does improve as the game progresses, thus making it harder and harder to remain in the game. Mjj237 00:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beating the game
Talk:Antonio de Literes

message: "Capilla Real in 1706"? I cannot find any evidence to support this date. According to this website:
*http://www.hoasm.org/VIIH/Literes.html
the correct date is 1693. Ogg 18:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: see 
http://imslp.org/wiki/Category:Literes,_Antonio 
& 
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_de_Literes
for very common Alternative Names/Transliterations. 124.171.128.162 (talk) 04:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?
Talk:Kirillo-Belozersky Monastery

message: While trying to figure out who Fool-for-Christ St. Asenatha of Goritsky was today, I happened upon this wikipedia page. I understand that it's start-class, and needs a lot of work that I can't perform. Frankly, I'm half a world away geographically, but as a history buff I am fascinated (and frustrated). Can someone whose Russian is better than mine at least put links to the Russian wikipedia pages about these places? It seems that for nearly a half century, the same museum authorities have been operating this monastery and the (female) Goritsky Convent less than 15 miles away. Jweaver28 (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We have the page on the Goritsky Convent, Goritsky Monastery (Goritsy), and links to the Russian pages are always on the left.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Goritsky Convent? 
Talk:Rossio

message: Do you recognize the square in this engraving?
Could it be Rossio or Comérçio?
--Error 22:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Auto da fe

message: 1964 photo, if anyone wants to add it. It's a not-great scan from a slide, but should be fine at the scale we use in Wikipedia. Note the different arrangement of traffic (more of the plaza devoted to cars than now). - Jmabel | Talk 23:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1964 photo 

message: Portugal would be Sao Domingo, later English St Dominic is used. Integration is needed. Xx236 (talk) 09:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Domingo Square ?
Talk:Pope's nose

message: Er .. against deletion. Why - well I was looking this up, and came here didn't I ? So it's useful to someone at least !
BTW, I was always taught that parson's nose was poisonous if eaten (just makes you ill, not deadly !) ... anyone know if this is true ?
The Yeti 18:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this be merged with Pygostyle? Drutt 08:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Addison County, Vermont

message: Most of the blue, active links on this page need to be either removed or redirected because almost all of them link to something irrelevant and not the intended page (if one even exists). 69.54.12.32 04:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also true of lists for most of the other states. For help and guidelines on doing fixing, check out the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject. --Ebyabe 13:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's probably some really really good reason why someone avoided constructing a template that someone might categorize and find (and change, maybe?). And some really really good reason why these aren't all invoked from one article which might be categorized under Vermont lists. I would really really like to hear that reason which I am sure will sound wonderful and logical when I do. Student7 00:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Avoidance of template
Talk:List of hospitals in Pennsylvania

message: The list has been inconsistently maintained and many entries are outdated.  There is also no consistent definition of a "hospital" for inclusion on this list.  I've begun to create a new sortable table that lists all licensed hospitals in the state according to the Hospital & Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania which has just updated (March 2018) their database of all licensed hospitals.  The information is provided by the hospitals itself and relying on this data will provide a consistent source for the inclusion and maintenance of data.  Please provide suggestions and thoughts.  CrazyPaco (talk) 19:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to inconsistent and outdated list
Talk:Dinosaur King

message: I don't know who deleted the List of Dinosaur King cards page, but it is needed to give the definition of the Move Cards. Rtkat3 (talk) 8:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The page is ot notable it can be contain on this page this is not fan site--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 20:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaur King cards 

message: Can someone please remove the spoilers in the anime story section?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kodai ryuta (talk • contribs) 01:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --DQ13|Dino Queen 18:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia does nto censor see wp:spoilers these will be reinstated--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 19:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, right, forgot that. But Andrewcrawford, there are 3 seasons because the dub split the 1st season into 2 seasons. --DQ13|Dino Queen 20:18, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The dub only split it because of the facy they tooka break there is no real source that says it two seasons plus the japanese format i think is preferred not to sure myself--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 20:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime Spoilers 

message: If someone find a review can put here:
*Volumes 1-2. I think it can help the article. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 03:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Since I tried it out in 2018 I noticed they've apparently licensed it too https://www.netflix.com/ca/title/80007912 should we list it under English distributors? Has 49+30 eps in English/French/Portugese/Spanish no Japanese raw audio though. 70.51.193.44 (talk) 04:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Netflix
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Chittenden County, Vermont

message: Number 14 in this listing, the Chittenden County Courthouse at 180 Church Street, no longer exists. DO NOT post a picture of the current courthouse at the corner of Main and Church (the former US Customs house, which is listed at Number 87).
Some confusion apparently results from the fact that the old courthouse and the current one were adjacent to each other. The land upon which the old courthouse stood is now part of the parking lot behind the current courthouse.
:So the image at right is not the one in the NRHP listing? Thundersnow (talk) 14:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured it out, the image was tagged with the court house NRHP number, not the customs house.  Thundersnow  07:27, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We routinely use images of parking lots, current buildings, etc. to represent now-demolished buildings.  Were the current courthouse on the site of the former one, an image of it would be appropriate.  Nyttend (talk) 00:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chittenden County Courthouse
Talk:WWE Magazine

message: Before the current incarnation of WWE Magazine (and its immediate RAW and Smackdown! predecessors), wasn't there a WWF Magazine? I'm almost certain there was, and I'm surprised there isn't mention of it in this article (as part of the history section). I think this should be added; it is easily researched and verifiable, IMO. [[Briguy52748 20:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WWF Magazine

message: Why was the cover history deleted? I think it and at least one picture of a cover should be kept on the page. --Nymetsfan 12:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover History

message: can we please add an issue guide for wwe magazine like we have for mad magazine §UB619! 21:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  issue guide 

message: Should there be a new article about the new WWE Kids Magazine?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.233.29.73 (talk) 12:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE Kids Magazine 

message: The Batista cover was the second issue, the first had Torrie Wilson on the cover--http://s11.bdbphotos.com/images/orig/f/2/f25didmpovqdvodd.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.89.96.113 (talk) 08:46, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First cover of the current run 
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Washington County, Vermont

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
Woodbury Graded School.  It is plotting in the city of Barre.  The correct coordinates are approximately 44.439945°N, 72.416748°W (NAD27). —66.192.202.22 (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 19:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Tracy Stallard

message: In addition, Stallard was on an early episode of To Tell The Truth on CBS as a decoy to county music artist Bill Anderson.
If anyone can find a reference for this, I'd appreciate it.
Of course, this is just a formality, since it looks like this article will never receive help or be graded above stub status. A forgotten man until the very end... Vodello (talk) 21:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statement moved to talk page.
Talk:Church of São Francisco (Porto)

message: First paragraph calls it the "most important" monument. Is that really the best description? Maybe "prominent", or "most prominent"? Why is it important? (not to mention most important?) Do we say the Mona Lisa is the most important painting or that the Pacific is the most important ocean? JBarta (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Prominent" seems to be a better choice of words. JoJan (talk) 19:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  most important? 
Talk:The Death of General Wolfe

message: Which of these two images of The painting we should be using?
Image:Benjamin West 005.jpg|Image 1
Image:Death-wolfe.jpg|Image 2
Image 1 has better detail, but Image 2 is more colourful and striking.  --Arctic Gnome 19:01, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which of these images is better? 

message: Which "painting of La Pietà" is being referred to? Danceswithzerglings (talk) 01:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: La Pietà

message: The man in green at left is identified (in the painting) as Sir William Johnson - his name is scratched on the powderhorn he wears - although Johnson himself was not at the battle. Since West named him, the article should reflect that.Catherinejarvis (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He is also pointing at a runner which is not included in the image here. Does anyone have a non cropped version. 67.69.76.26 (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Man in green 

message: It's surprising that John Honeyman is not portrayed, since Wolfe had made Honeyman his personal bodyguard after Honeyman had saved him from a likely-fatal fall during the Atlantic crossing on the frigate Boyne.  In the story written by Honeyman's grandson in 1873 "Our Home," Honeyman is said to have reported that he carried Wolfe from the battlefield "walking in blood the whole way."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.12.93.134 (talk) 05:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Honeyman 

message: Though several other people have already mentioned this, I just wanted to point out that the current image used in the infobox is cut off on the left side, cutting off the runner bearing the French flag (allegorical of the French defeat). Aside from the problems inherent in the image in the infobox not be the entirety of the original painting, it is compounded upon by the fact that the article makes direct reference to the runner, when the reader of the article cannot even see the runner from the image included. I think it would be beneficial to the state of the article if this could be fixed. Bombadil3019 (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image needed
Talk:Peter Shafirov

message: The article heavily depends upon one source and needs multiple sources in order to establish notability of the subject as per Wikipedia notability guideline. See, WP:REF, WP:RELY and Why we have these requirements. Multiple references help reasonably balance the article complies with Wikipedia neutral point of view as well. Thanks. AnupMehra ✈ 11:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: One source
Talk:Arbroath railway station

message: An anonymous editor has questioned the History section of this article by adding the following comment:
The North British, Arbroath & Montrose Railway was incorporated by Act of Parliament 1871 so the above is clearly incorrect.
I have removed the above comment from the article text and placed it here instead.–Signalhead < T > 16:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The station predates the North British, Arbroath and Montrose Railway. I have revised the text to reflect the history including additional references. --Stewart (talk | edits) 17:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History / opening date 
Talk:Dundee railway station

message: Dundee was the starting station of the longest direct rail journey in Britain - the 06.43 Virgin Cross Country service to Penzance, which took just over 12 hours to complete. The station was the terminus of the reverse of this journey, the 08:30 Arriva CrossCountry service from Penzance which arrived at Dundee at 20:25. As of December 14 2008, the longest through journey is now the 0820 from Aberdeen to Penzance, arriving into Penzance at 2150, a staggering 13.5 hours long.
Dundee was only the starting point of this 'longest direct rail journey' for a short period of time.  Following WW1 there was the first Aberdeen to Penzance service and in the 1980s there was an Elgin to Penzance service. http://www.virgintrainsmediaroom.com/index.cfm?articleid=403
Ballymoss9018 (talk) 09:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is not the only National Rail station below sea level. Examples are in Merseyside such as Liverpool St James Stree, Birkenhead Hamilton Square and maybe Glasgow Central Low Level  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.171.58 (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dundee station 

message: I do not think that Dundee East railway station should redirect here. The historic Dundee East station had no real connection with the current Dundee station (which was Dundee Taybridge). The other defunct major station in the city,Dundee West railway station, now has its own article. Equally, two of Dundee East's predecessors as the terminus of the Dundee and Arbroath Railway, Roodyards railway station and Craigie railway station) now have articles and given Dundee East had a much longer career than they did, is covered in several published books about Dundee and about Scottish Railways, I think it might also be justified in having its own article. Dunarc (talk) 21:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dundee East 
Talk:Broughty Ferry railway station

message: There's no need for the new services to be listed. No other station lists exact services - at most, you get stopping patterns (e.g. trains at xx:30 to such-and-such a destination). Marks87 (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New services 

message: As a ticket examiner working from Dundee during that period, I can tell you exactly what happened to the service. The service was covered by three DMUs running from Arbroath all the way to Perth starting at 07.00 through to 19.00 with an hourly service. The management decided that the service was not running at a profit, so to reduce the cost, they cancelled two of the trains so the service. So the service was still hourly, it was run only between Dundee and Carnoustie which resulted in a drop in passenger numbers as most of the passengers were travelling between Carnoustie and Arbroath. Because of this, it was quite often that there was more staff than passengers on the train. This allowed the services to be terminated. Management also decided at this time that they no longer need Ticket Examiners and they made our jobs redundant. Luckily I managed to secure another position within the railway until my retirement in January 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:23c7:2700:7201:2d3a:3486:5283:b052 (talk) 13:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduction of services in 1990`s