Talk:Social business

message: Currently, this article suggests that the use of social software as an immediate jump to social media; however,in a recent blog post I made:
https://community.jivesoftware.com/community/jivetalks/blog/2012/03/11/the-evolution-of-a-social-business
I suggest that there is in fact a gap between the definition of "social media" and the growing term, "social business" in the social industry.  I would like to know how to go about making a separate page  for the same term.  Also, perhaps making a page for its popular acronym "socbiz"
Any guidance?  Any content owners that I need to engage for approvals?  Appreciate any assistance. =)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Socbiz rutan (talk • contribs) 04:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Disambiguation for guidance on making a separate page for the same term with different meaning.--JayJasper (talk) 04:58, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New to Wikipedia.  Looking to Offer Alternative definition for Social Business 

message: Social Business relates to companies deploying social technologies to acquire and serve customers, impriving collaboration inside an organization and many other prociess improvements.  I drafted and cited better defintions.  It continues to be deleted.
Social Business is a recent but popular trend revolutionizing the way companies function and generate value for all the constituents (stakeholders, employees, customers, partners, suppliers). http://www.socialbusinessforum.com/what-is-social-business/
Organizations can’t help but recognize that social technologies are indeed creating opportunities to acquire and serve more customers, often at lower cost. Social business also helps companies build internal communities that improve business processes. http://www.protiviti.com/socialbusiness
Businesses move from liking to leading when they look beyond social media to see how social technologies drive real business value. From marketing and sales to product and service innovation, social is changing the way people connect and the way organizations succeed. When you inspire your workforce to innovate and collaborate more productively, you create tangible business value. When you anticipate needs and deliver exceptional experiences, you delight your customers and create advocates. When you integrate your business processes with the right social tools, you secure a competitive advantage and pioneer new ways of doing business. http://www.ibm.com/social-business/us/en/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Socialbusinessstrategist (talk • contribs) 18:17, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  THIS ARTICLE IS WAY OUT OF DATE---  

message: Copied from my talk page:
Please provide reasons for reverting all my changes to the "Social Business" page. I am an expert in the field of Social Business, and I work in the sector. Please provide suggestions or changes/references you deem necessary. If I don't hear from you, I will re-insert my edits. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.234.118.62 (talk) 12:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, your edits weren't sourced. Please read Wikipedia:Reliable Sources and ascertain what kind of sources are needed. Also, you may be an expert, but we don't put up Original Research on Wiki, please read these links. Thank you. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

text: Who is Yunus? I hope you have gone thru the links I gave you completely, even if something is sourced, it needs to be a good reliable source. Also, please ensure that the prose used is suitable for an encyclopedia, otherwise someone else may have an issue with it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

text: I don't know anything about Social Business. I never said I did. I don't need to know about a topic to undo an edit that doesn't conform to Wikipedia policies. I don't need to read the article I reverted. I reverted it because it was unsourced. You don't need to be an expert to edit an article, being an expert gives you no special right over another editor. From WP:EXPERT#General, No editor is exempt from fundamental Wikipedia policies concerning acceptability of contributions; in particular, the policies of no original research and verifiability along with guidelines such as reliable sources still apply. Although other encyclopedias might have articles based on personal "expert opinion" or unpublished conjecture, WP requires all text to be verifiable to published sources. and Experts, of course, can be wrong; and different experts can reasonably disagree on the same topic.. Have a nice day. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:21, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I suggest you two take this discussion to the Talk page of the article, where it is likely to get attention and participation from those who may be interested in editing this article. Having said that, I agree that one need not be a subject matter expert to edit any article on Wikipedia (WP:Expert) to ask for general and fundamental policies, such as the use of reliable sources, and adequate, proportional, and unbiased citations to be followed. -- Rohini (talk) 06:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

text: I have already moved it. I was using an automated tool named Stiki, which only shows me the difference between two edits, and hence I did not see the start of the article. I undid your edit because it seemed unsourced, and until you can provide a valid source, that will remain the case. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Interestingly, all the references to Yunus has now been removed as advertising. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:23, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unsoucred info 

message: Criticism of Micro-Credit is no longer included in this section. The time value of money criticism was also removed. 
However criticism of 'non-dividend' is still relevant, since this is a key part of Social Business. The current Criticism section is accurately sourced to AntiCSR. AntiCSR has been cited by many business students and researchers. Criticism that Social Business is vague and its features difficult to define are legitimate. 
Without a Criticism section, this article could be biased. Without a Criticism section, the article reads as if it is written by proponents of Social Business.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.5.120 (talk) 03:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADDING A 'Criticism' SECTION