Talk:Type 214 submarine

message: Look at this. "The 214 submarine is a further improvement on the Type 212." ⇒Bayerischermann  - 16:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Less advanced?

message: :There are two numbers in the article for the 214's mission endurance: 50 days and 12 weeks (7d-week = 84 days, 5d-week = still 60 days). Does anyone know which number is right? Or is there some kind of tactical reserve in the 12 weeks included? Cheers, Enrico  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.55.155.5 (talk) 00:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mission Endurance

message: Shouldn't the article be locked? Apparently a Greek user with a dynamic IP keeps changing the part about the refusal of TKMS to deliver the boat to the Greek Navy. However many sources, e.g. Jane's, confirm this policy of TKMS Rebell18190 (talk)
The comments about Greek government not paying for defensive systems is inaccurate and offensive. As for the sub, if it meets the specs it will be paid for. If not, negotiations are in order. That's accepted practice with ANY contract.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.203.239 (talk) 01:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Greek Navy Orders

message: Subs 214 class are not derivative of 212A class, source - naval technology is mistaken. According to prof. Urlich Gabler, submarine designer and the founder of Ingenieurkontor Lubeck, they are result of experience in building subs 209 class - just in connection with development of 212A class. --Matrek (talk) 01:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type 214 versus Type 212A  

message: Three range estimates are given in the info box, depending on speed and whether the sub is surfaced or submerged. I'm not sure I understand these figures. Let's say the sub is traveling at 4 kts submerged. Once it travels 1248 nm, is it out of fuel? (i.e. does it have to be back in port at that point?) Or is this range just a function of battery power, in which case it can surface and keep going on diesel power (and I guess even re-charge its batteries to be able to submerge itself again)? 
I wonder if there is a way to clarify this in the info box, in this and other submarine articles. It may be perfectly obvious to a submarine expert how to interpret the numbers, but it is not so obvious to a layman like myself who happens to be reading an encyclopedia article. NipsonAnomimata (talk) 14:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification about range 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/type_212/
*:Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Type 214 submarine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716070146/http://www.sea.siemens.com/us/internet-dms/Internet/MarineComm/General/Docs/Siemens%20Presents%20Fuel%20Cell%20at%20the%20Advance%20Naval%20Propulsion%20Symposium.pdf to http://www.sea.siemens.com/us/internet-dms/Internet/MarineComm/General/Docs/Siemens%20Presents%20Fuel%20Cell%20at%20the%20Advance%20Naval%20Propulsion%20Symposium.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061101100318/http://www.hellenic-shipyards.gr/pg/submarines3.htm to http://www.hellenic-shipyards.gr/pg/submarines3.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: According to thyssenkrupp AG, submarine manufacturer, The length is over all 72m  (approx.) and surface displacement is 2,000 t (approx.) . Link: https://www.thyssenkrupp-marinesystems.com/en/products-services/submarines/class-214 Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 19:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length and displacement need correction.