Talk:Shin Megami Tensei: Digital Devil Saga 2

message: The information on this article is mostly inaccurate and filled with spoilers. I recommend a clean up.
I agree. Too much and innecesary spoilers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.123.122.239 (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate?

message: Sorry I have only played the JP version. Is that the term Lokapedia actually appears in the game? Or is it sinply a joke? -- Sameboat - 同舟 07:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you specifically had the resistance group's name in mind, then no. Their name in the english version is "Lokapala" (which supposedly means "guardians of the gods").--Maikito 13:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LokaPEDIA? 

message: ...And it was changed back to the poorly-written way it was before. I'm not going to get into a edit war, but why is this page calling for an edit when some people won't accept them? 214.13.209.200 12:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So I just edited Seraph's article... 

message: Since the character list is so long, I put a tag suggesting it be split into List of characters from Shin Megami Tensei.  I am not sure if this is the right place to send it, as I am not very familiar with the game, myself.  If there is someone who knows about the game, please give your input. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 12:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have splitted the characters section. However, I did not fully moved the texts and left some on the main article (removing most of the details and leaving the introduction texts). Please do the appropriate changes if you want to remove everything in the main article, rendering users to turn over to the new, character list article.Logicartery (talk) 04:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be rather difficult for anyone who don't actually know where the texts in the character list came from to move the section. Simply, it does not cite any references and would seem to appear to be original researches.122.53.163.187 (talk) 10:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have declined the speedy deletion of this spin-out, as this situation does not meet speedy deletion criteria. However, I have noted the source of the new article in edit summary for GFDL compliance. I note that the guidelines for splitting articles did not set out steps for doing this; I have remedied that. Please determine here whether the editors interested in this subject feel this split is appropriate. If so, you will need to complete the steps by removing redundant information from this article and leaving a summary, with a pointer to the main article. If it is determined that the split is not appropriate, please consider handling the subpage by WP:PROD or, if the contributor who created it agrees to the deletion, he may tag it  to indicate his request that an administrator remove the article. I'm watching this article; if you have any questions about my rationale, I will be happy to expand here. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Miss Moonriddengirl, I already talked to 'some' of the contributors to the section but none of them replies. What could happen to the article now? And I'm very sorry because I lost track of those who really contributed to the article. 122.53.173.199 (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character list 

message: I'm thinking the gameplay section needs some work or let's just simply leave it that way? I'll try to divide it into some sub-sections if ever.--JCD (Talk) 11:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the gameplay section 

message: I wasn't noticed or even asked for permission. That is so rude. I wasn't noticed at all. Whoever removed links from that article, better send me a message now asap.--JCD (Talk) 09:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who asked for deletion of the article about the characters???