lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chepstow Railway Bridge

message: Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Re-Review and In-line citations 

message: This article is currently under Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 21:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:GA/R|Good Article Review]]

message: Review the comments leading to this consensus here. Article may be re-submitted in the future once the issues left by reviewers are sorted. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed
Talk:Matthew 1:3

message: Tamar, the wife of Judah, is the first of four women that are added to Matthew's genealogy.
Tamar was not Judah's wife. She was his daughter-in-law. She did not have sexual relations as Judah's wife, but in the guise of a temple prostitute. They never married. 69.42.13.45 (talk) 14:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judah's wife?
Talk:Matthew 1:9

message: Despite the notes above, an AfD indication to redirect is not binding, decisions to merge or redirect are editorial decisions and are always reversable. If it were otherwise, I'd need to go to WP:DRV to contest the first AfD, and that would be ridiculous.
As it stands, this article includes verifiable NPOV information on this verse. We don't blank good information in wikipedia. If you think the information is not so, then please give reasons and then remove it. If you think we should lose this information, then tell me why. If you don't think that there should be an article on this verse, and that the information is best organised in a different form, then you are, of course, free to merge this article with Matthew 1 - I personally will not oppose that. --Doc ask? 20:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please explain what part of this article is not covered in Matthew 1 or Genealogy of Jesus and I will gladly merge it.  The AFD may not be binding, but because you disagree with it is not a valid reason. kotepho 21:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't disagree with this page pointing to Matthew 1, as long as no information is lost. However, most of the information here that directly relates to this verse, its meaning and its textual Greek variants, is not Matthew 1. There is quite a bit of specialist work to be done effecting a good merge. --Doc ask? 23:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like minutia to me.  kotepho 23:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring this for now 
Talk:Andreas Karlstadt

message: "In 1510 he acquired his Doctorate of Martin Luther's later 95 Theses that sparked the Reformation." What does this sentence mean? Did something get left out? - Rlvaughn 9 July 2005 14:02 (UTC)
This guy seems to be clearly more a theologian than a philosopher, and I am moving his category to reflect this. KSchutte 20:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The German iconoclasm mouvement started in 1524, the Dutch in 1566, more than a generation later. I think a short hint at this latest effect of Carlstadt's ideas would suffice, with the details in the article on Beeldenstorm.
--Ft (talk) 09:22, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch [[Beeldenstorm]]
Talk:Archduchess Louise of Austria

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 21:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Support As per my reasoning below Charles 18:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: this article mentions a brother, but does not say which one. Tinynanorobots (talk) 17:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  brother
Talk:Matthew 1:17

message: The hyperlink "Salmon" in the first column of the genealogy links to the article on the fish of that name.  
It should link to the Biblical character, as "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmon_%28Biblical_figure%29". 92.87.28.5 (talk) 09:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salmon - hyperlink 

message: This verse is a later corruption. According to www.disciplesofyeshuwa.com/gospel_of_matthew.html, the verse is not in Hebrew Matthew, which makes sense because obviously there are more than 14 generations. 
Another witness is that http://adamoh.org/TreeOfLife.lan.io/SDAcomms/Hebrew%20Gospel%20of%20MATTHEW%20by%20George%20Howard%20-%20Part%20One.pdf puts this verse in parentheses, which means that it's in some manuscripts but not others.
73.121.228.133 (talk) 05:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verse is not in Hebrew Matthew 

message: It’s not 14 generations from Abraham to Jesus. it’s 42 generations. Abraham to to David (14) David to Exile (14) and Exile to Jesus(14) adding it- 42. Matthew 1:17. Can you correct it. Thank you ❤️ 2601:192:8600:5187:E8BF:C13C:3FEF:B1A (talk) 22:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It’s wrong
Talk:Matthew 1:18

message: This article has survived a Vote for Deletion.  For more details see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Matthew 1:verses. --Allen3 talk July 9, 2005 14:05 (UTC)
Not sure about where the discussion of "geneseos" comes from. The Greek says "genesis".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.143.238.246 (talk) 23:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD Results
Talk:Tuxedo Park, New York

message: :The name is from a native word tucsedo, which has more than one meaning.
And these meanings would be...?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.206.79 (talk • contribs) 
:The native word mentioned is possibly not wholly correct, because some Tuxedo place names are believed to come from phrases.
:They include (for only two examples), the Cherokee phrase p'tauk suttough (place of the bears or wolves) and the Algonquian phrases p'tuck-sepo (crooked river).  There may well be more, but unless you can find an acceptable source which also narrows it down, it might have to stand as it is.   Which native tribe inhabited the area in earlier times?  2602:30A:2C4A:1CB0:114A:C151:15A2:34DA (talk) 00:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: I deleted the history that was obviously copied verbatim from the Village of Tuxedo Park page  possibly in violation of their copyright.
That version also reads like a sales brochure and is not really encyclopedic.  I reverted to the last prior version of the History section by 67.81.182.206. Zander 02:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Was one of the celebrities who grew up and lived at Tuxedo Park. (Herman Munster) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.140.146.158 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FRED GWYNNE
Talk:Matthew 1:25

message: Of course, the verse cited is not "explicitly clear" that Mary was a virgin.  That is an assumption.  The verse only says that Joseph had not had sexual relations with her, leaving open exactly the possibility that he feared when in verse 19 he planned to "put her away privily."  --Blainster 23:39, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Virginity evidence
Talk:Virtual Storage Access Method

message: How does VSAM compare to ISAM?
Limbo socrates 9 July 2005 14:13 (UTC)
NigelMorton (talk) 21:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison with ISAM 

message: Note the closing paragraph:
Throughout this documentation, the term VSAM relative-record data set (or RRDS) is used to mean both relative-record data sets with fixed-length records and with variable-length records, unless they need to be differentiated.
--199.254.202.129 22:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Paragraph removed - it didn't add anything. --NigelMorton (talk) 21:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Done, rm'ed all that was added then. --Jerome Potts (talk) 08:16, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation? 

message: *Master catalog, user catalog. --Jerome Potts (talk) 08:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing "buzzwords" 

message: I updated the article to include a brief reference to catalogs, page spaces and swap spaces, and realized that there should also be a discussion of the alternate index (AIX). Would that be better placed in this article or in the KSDS article? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 23:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate indexes 

message: A recent edit created a new section called External Links and moved an item there from See Also. Shouldn't it have instead been moved to the existing References section? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 16:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if it supports a claim made in the article.  If it's just a random page that happens to mention VSAM, no - and it's not even that any more (that link goes to a general page about Guardium that mentions VSAM nowhere obvious on it). Guy Harris (talk) 20:44, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References versus external links? 

message: IBM referred to it as the "Virtual Storage Access Method", not the "virtual  storage access method"; see, for example, this VSAM programmer's guide. Guy Harris (talk) 05:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  So why was "Virtual Storage Access Method" wrong?
Talk:Shax (demon)

message: I have a copy of Crowley's Liber CCCLXV, The Preliminary Invocation of the Goetia. It is the revised 1904 translaton of Ars Goetia. I am wondering where exactly alot of this information is coming from. Some of it is good but some appears to be cruft? Is anyone working from the original Key of Solomon text? Refs would be appreciated --Weev 9 July 2005 14:18 (UTC)
A point should be made that Shax is also used as shorthand for Shakespeare  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.162.129 (talk) 20:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I've deleted several very detailed descriptions of Shax's appearances in the show. I believe this is a form of original research. If you're considering adding it back in, I'd like to suggest taking at look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/How to write an episode article and Wikipedia:Television episodes. While not completely applicable to fictional characters, they are good starting points. I'd be happy to help and answer questions on this. Pigman 23:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted sections 

message: I was going to split out the content related to Charmed, but that article (Shax (Charmed)) had already been removed at a previous AfD, and I didn't want to recreate an already deleted article, so I added a summary blurb to the Goetic demons in popular culture that seems to cover the matter in the appropriate level of detail. Mintrick (talk) 02:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but I think the Charmed section should stay, Shax is one of the major demons that needs more than a blurb. And as I say on your discussion page, you need more opinions before you make a huge change like this. Tavy08 (talk) 02:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's debatable, and I disagree. In any case, that information doesn't belong here; it needs to be on either the pop culture page, or a separate article. Mintrick (talk) 02:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Also I should point out you are not deleting it all in the first place, and deleting some information that does not need deleted making for a very messy deletion.Tavy08 (talk) 02:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please explain this further. Mintrick (talk) 02:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of charmed content
Talk:Bermuda national cricket team

message: If people could give me a hand in finding references for this page I'd appreciate it: there's absolutely nothing for the first 60%+ of the article. Added in lots today when expanding and writing prose about this year's cricket, and will get working on the rest of the article later today/tomorrow, but if anyone's able to help that'd be great. Cheers. AllynJ 12:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Bermuda, adjective Bermudan! Bermudia sounds un-educated and silly.1812ahill (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bermudian? 
Talk:Particle image velocimetry

message: This article needs some major expansion on numerous fronts.  Techniques that should be added or expanded:
stereoscopic piv
dual-plane stereoscopic piv
micropiv
Equipment should be expanded on to include some mention of the optics and lasers utilized.  Software and analysis techniques should also be mentioned to complete the entry.  I do have experience in the field but haven't done large edits before.  So if you see a formatting error please point it out.  Iron Engineer (talk) 03:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Hello, everyone.  I am about to post an update to this page to expand the MicroPIV section and include a time resolved section on the same topic.  I have an interesting question though.  I want to cite papers on the topic, but some of the papers I want to cite were written by myself, as I am an active researcher in the field.  I don't really get how this would work with Wikipedia: original research guidelines.  They are published in scientific journals of good standing, but it is my own research.  Guidance on that issue would be appreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.151.130.136 (talk) 05:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Go right ahead - as I understand it, WP:OR policy says any statement on WP should be directly found in a source, rather than "based on" or "inferred from" the source.  There's no prohibition on citing yourself (I've done it myself many times), and I always encourage other academics and researchers to come to WP and add the results of their published papers to the appropriate articles, since I strongly feel that doing so is good for both parties (outreach + article improvement and expert attention). HCA (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time Resolved MicroPIV 

message: Озабоченность 185.17.128.8 (talk) 12:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Телефон
Talk:Murasaki no Ue

message: Wikipedia actually is not a dictionary. Therefore the color translation now in article is inappropriate. There are indications that the user who changed the article as such, is doing those things to prove a point. 217.140.193.123 9 July 2005 15:27 (UTC)
Made a few changes to clarify things - Murasaki Shikibu was never a provincial governor herself, she was the daughter of one. Put the bit about 'the daughter of Fujiwara Michinaga' in parenthesis to make it clear this was describing the Empress, not Murasaki. Added a link to Fujiwara Michinaga, and the word 'literary' to describe Murasaki and Sei Shonagon's rivalry, as there is no evidence they ever actually met and it might give people the wrong idea to suggest they knew about each other in any other way. Also removed references to the fictional Murasaki being Lady Rokujo's daughter, as there was no such relation.--Suetsumuhana 18:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. As an uncontested WP:BOLDMOVE since this article has no move history. Murasaki (disambiguation) should have been listed here, as base names should not redirect to disambiguated pages. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 08:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Murasaki →  – correct name, see Japanese Wikipedia and sources. "Murasaki" means primarily different things and should redirect to Murasaki (disambiguation). See also other main character Aoi no Ue naming format. Gryffindor (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 February 2024
Talk:Steve Armstrong

message: I removed the prod tag from this article, I intend to source it within the next few days, if I cannot find good sources I will personally put it up for AFD.  MPJ -DK  09:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *And you need to stop misusing the rules and claim you're within your rights - I'm sure you were allowed to Prod however many articles you had on your list, giving you carte blanche to just disregard the "contentious" portions of the rules is highly doubtful. In fact "burden of proof" wise, it's on you to prove that you're "a special case" in regards to overapplying the rules of sources in BLPs.  MPJ -DK  18:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

text: *:No, it's not. The burden clearly lies with the person attempting to reinsert challenged material. I've challenged the material, so source it, or it stays out. UnitAnode 18:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *you did not "challenge" the material - you just went "oh it's unsourced", apparently the definition of "contentious" has just been stretched to near breaking point.   MPJ -DK  18:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

text: *:I'm telling you right now, I challenged it. Either source it, or it stays out. UnitAnode 18:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *LOL that definition is about to snap, "i challenge it"... that's precious.  MPJ -DK  19:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

text: *:"Precious"? Hardly. It's simply what is supposed to happen. I remove it (read: challenge it), and it's either sourced or stays out. UnitAnode 00:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod tag

message: Was Steve Armstrong was born in 1964 or 1965? I can't tell because in the box on the right it said 1964 but on the article it said 1965. It's probably appropriate to put a source under which birth year is correct. Minimac94 (talk) 18:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Consistency is key, I must have mistyped when I redid the info box, fixed with a source to verify which is right.  MPJ -DK  18:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Simple Question
Talk:River card

message: Don't 7-stud players call their last card the "river" too? Evercat 9 July 2005 15:45 (UTC)
But where do the terms river, turn & flop originate from?  Jaycee21 24/01/08 (UK)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.45.132.251 (talk) 10:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment
Talk:Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance

message: This is a nice start!
Thanks. Is there anything more that needs to be included? It could be a whole book but then people should buy a book. A basic definition and informative basic explanation seems like all that is needed. Any suggestions?--Nick Y. 20:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The article doesn't explain, in my view, why a packet that rotates "in phase" in the device, produces a signal of different frequencies. Is the exciting signal switched off at some point?  If so, this should be stated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just127 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: In ICR cell types, several users have added specific examples of Open cells over the years, but the list is not comprehensive (nor is it a list). There are many newcomers to this field, but I don't know if adding them would conform to WP:GNG.  I propose that we either expand and edit the current list of cell types or remove the specific types listed in the article and make Ion cell types generic with 'open' and 'closed'. Thoughts? Paulthomas2 (talk) 12:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC FTICR Cell Types
Talk:Morton Sobell

message: According to some sources the prosecution and judge (entirely improperly?!) discussed marking Sobell for execution along with Julius, rather than Ethel Rosenberg. Anyone know if this is reliable enough to include*? (It would certainly tend to mark out the decision to sentence ER as based on other than strict questions of guilt).
*eg Congressional Hearings 1982, statement of Maarshall Perlin???
The present article implies that Sobell is no longer living - is this intentional? Linuxlad 14:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we know the sentences on the Rosenbergs weren't based on "strict questions of guilt" because on the evidence presented David Greenglass was guilty of more.  His wife Ruth was also named a co-conspirator, but never even charged.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

text: To clarify: I think the secrets that he apparently gave to the Soviet Union should be mentioned.  After all, he doesn't seem to have had a military role.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:04, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: In 2008, at age 91, he told The New York Times that he did turn over military secrets to the Soviets during World War II, though he describes them as "junk" and says they were of no value to the Soviet Union. This was the first time he publicly admitted guilt. There is big difference between the phrase "He admitted he turned over military secrets" and the phrase "He admitted guilt". According to the article in the NY Times, Morton Sobell said the first, not the second. - 91.122.3.121 (talk) 10:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formulation 
Talk:Sour grapes

message: We need some disambiguation and separate articles on the proverbial expression and psychological phenomenon of "sour grapes" or cognitive dissonance, and the parable of the fox who declared the grapes sour because he could not reach them.
I added some disambiguation on this page, which takes the reader to the article about the Aesopic fable The Fox and the Grapes.--Polylerus 01:28, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Hudibrastic

message: Interesting. This appears to be the verse form used for Burns' humorous narrative poem, Tam o' Shanter -- same metre same feminine rhyming. -- Derek Ross |  Talk 9 July 2005 16:17 (UTC)
:Indeed!  Tam o' Shanter has a lot in common.  For example, its great aim is the spying of a lass, here inflated to the Epic quest, and then the fearful retreat embattled by witches that aren't there.  It is exactly the same kind of comic deflation and parody, and Burns knew what he was about.  (He also had his share of contempt for 'Tha Uncou Good,' of whom Tam may be a member but who talked of witches and such far too much.  That these same folks were the Puritans that Butler satirized is also probably germane.)  I hadn't thought of that Burns observation before, but it's spot on, and Burns, let's remember, is an 18th century poet.  Geogre 02:49, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled