Talk:Cricket World Cup

message: Just checking, but the 2015 Rugby World Cup and the 2017 World Baseball Classic both had higher total attendance figures than the 2015 Cricket World Cup. The mention that the Cricket World Cup was the third highest in attendance after the FIFA World Cup and the Summer Olympics was not cited.Barney Hill (talk) 15:25, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attendance 

message: Please update the table of the world champions. Fury Anish2003 (talk) 18:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: .  Given the flurry of activity, I'm assuming it has been.  Otherwise, it's not clear what you want.  –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2019 

message: Please replace 
"Twenty nations have qualified for the Cricket World Cup at least once. Seven teams have competed in every tournament, five of which have won the title."
with
"Twenty nations have qualified for the Cricket World Cup at least once. Seven teams have competed in every tournament, six of which have won the title."
beacuse New Zealand also won the title in 2019. yash.. 04:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Willbb234 (talk) 09:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2019 

message: At World Cup Results/History it says 2019 World Cup was won by England over New Zealand due to more boundaries and pure luck. The "pure luck" part is unprofessional. 82.217.164.86 (talk) 08:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2019 

message: I re-removed the content about the 2011 final allegedly being fixed. The claims were made 9 years after the event, received little coverage and an investigation into them was quickly closed as no evidence was ever provided : . Spike 'em (talk) 17:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection from me. W. P. Uzer (talk) 20:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of sourced content 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus against the proposed moves   (t · c) buidhe 00:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: p.s. Should this proposal fail, I think some of the related pages (such as History of the Cricket World Cup) should have their undiscussed page moves reverted, but the nominator here closed their own request early. Spike 'em (talk) 11:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 February 2021 

message: I suggest adding protection to prevent any acts of vandalism EsTuHabil (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection suggestion 

message: wheres the trophy at? Pharaoh496 (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't appear to be a copyright free version of it. Iirc at least three copyright violations have been uploaded with the claim that a picture of the trophy on some grass was someone's "own work". I suspect we'd be better off not having one if this is the standard - unfortunately a major problem in some circles by the looks of it (I noticed the same problem with some photos of stadiums as well) Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: thats a bit odd aint it? its been there for ages i reckon, cant someone upload a new picture properly? icc has made that wc pic public Pharaoh496 (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Find us an open source version of the file then. Or creative commons. I don't think a fair use rationale will work here. You find the image and I'll check it. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: search "cricket wc trophy" on google and click images. you will find the latest wc pic everywhere. that can be cropped and used, since its on icc's website also Pharaoh496 (talk) 05:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And one of them are open source and I can't find one that's suitable that's creative commons. Everything else you're finding through Google is copyright. It doesn't need to say that it is, but unless you can source an actual open source or creative commons image we can't use it. Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2527112 found'em Pharaoh496 (talk) 07:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nominated for deletion - it's an obvs crop of an obvs copyvio Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: damn it - someone really is dedicated for the cup to not be on wikipedia Pharaoh496 (talk) 08:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TROPHY PICS I

message: A proper trophy pic is needed for the page. This one isnt previewing Pharaoh496 (talk) 14:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TROPHY PICS II 

message: Honest question here: if Wales does not have its own Cricket Board, with Welsh players and teams being affiliated to the English Board, why does it count as a host for 1983, 1999 and 2019? The way I see it, the mere fact that games were played in Wales is not enough; otherwise, the hosts for 2007 should be Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, and Trinidad and Tobago. BLOGuil (talk) 23:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wales as a host 

message: I would like to change the highest culmulative scorer in Cricket World Cup, as it is now Virat Kohli (India), as stated here: https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/cricket/virat-kohli-world-cup-runs-sachin-tendulkar-b2428275.html. Also, the total amount of runs in CWC of Virat Kohli stated there is outdated. It is actually: 2311 + 16 + 103 + 95 + 88 + 101 + 51 + 117 = 2882 runs. Scthecool (talk) 00:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've solved this by removing both parameters that deal with individual statistics from the infobox. As I understand it, these are designed for use on an individual edition's infobox, not for something that occurs as frequently as this Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2023 

message: AUSTRALIA IS THE WINNER 2409:40C4:139:6CF0:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2023 

message: If you had so much problem with no reference and you think it's not that a difficult job, why not do it yourself.  Cric editor (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Tournament records in Cricket World Cup page