Talk:Alfred J. Kwak

message: Does anyone know anything about released DVDs of this series? I believe that a DVD set was supposed to come out "somewhere in August" this year, but I have not seen anything of it thus far. —msikma <user_talk:msikma> 21:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVDs 

message: I found it on animenewsnetwork.com...  is this series considerd a anime or a cartoon? what do you reccon? --Acidburn24m 22:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, it's a cartoon. The reason why I think it's listed on something like animenewsnetwork is the fact that all the animation was done by Japanese animators. The original characters and general designs were drawn by German illustrator Harald Siepermann, who certainly doesn't come from an anime tradition. mensch • t 00:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The word "anime" has the same meaning as "cartoon". It depends on what style you recon prevails. If the Japanese influences are strong enough, you could call it an anime. I don't think that it is, but since it's been included in several anime sites and actually has been translated and broadcast in Japan (something that does not generally happen to cartoons), the article should probably say that it "may be seen as anime". I still recon it's a cartoon. function msikma(user:UserPage, talk:TalkPage):Void 12:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a while since I wrote my previous comment, but I'd like to retract it anyway. I do think we should call it an anime, because the animation of this TV show was made in Japan, in the usual Japanese style. That should define it as "anime", despite the fact it's originally Dutch. —msikma (user, talk) 22:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this series considerd a anime series..? 

message: I noticed that this page is mostly about the animated TV series, for which I have two complaints:
# The name of the TV series and the original story is not "Alfred Jodocus Kwak", but "Alfred J. Kwak". This means the page redirect should be the other way around. The full name of the main character is Alfred Jodocus Kwak.
# The TV series is just one of the many incarnations of the story. There is a comic strip, several books, and of course three seperate theatre shows (1976, 1987 and 2003).
All in all this page comes very short of what Alfred J. Kwak really is.
-- Peter 21:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's true that this article is specific to the TV series. There should be articles about the other adaptations as well, I believe. Maybe it's best to move this page to Alfred J. Kwak (TV series), and then make stub articles for Alfred J. Kwak (book), Alfred J. Kwak (theatre show), and Alfred J. Kwak (comic book) when someone has the time to work on them. I personally wouldn't make a separate article for the character, because it might be hard to come up with information that hasn't already been mentioned in any of the other articles, and it may be deleted for being too minor if it doesn't expand properly within a reasonable time. —msikma (user, talk) 21:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this page be about the cartoon, the character or the story ? 

message: :Image:Alfred J Kwak N.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. —msikma (user, talk) 20:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Alfred J Kwak N.jpg

message: I typically wouldn't care, because of production teams and such, but Alfred J. Kwak appears to be a bit more than what one meets the eye. While I know the term Anime means Animation in General, I solely do believe the series can be considered a Japanese anime. For one, the production team for the series is heavily Japanese, with some Character Designs, Music, as well as Story Writing is Dutch. However, the main animation, sound effects, episode dialogue, and among other things, are entirely Japanese. Also, in particular, the Japanese version has a full production team listing for the episodes. In the past, Wikipedia has listed shows, such as Mysterious Cities of Gold, and Ulysses 31 as Japanese Anime (Though noted a coproduction). Another thing I want to make perfectly clear, is some versions brought over to the Western markets, are not dutched based dubs. The Spanish dub, in particular (unsure as to which one) has the japanese episode titles in the beginning, as well as the Next Time segments, which the titles are only available on the Japanese release, and versions based off this edition.
Another thing to be in particular, is that TV-Tokyo was directly involved in the anime's production. Typically, I'd rule it off as being added as an extra credit for airing, but they are listed in the Dutch Credits (opening and ending, if I recall correctly), which aired a couple months before the Japanese airing of the series (which, again, anime coproductions have aired in other countries before it's domestic markets. Look at Transformers Armada for example. As well as an oddball example of Sonic X, which isn't a coproduction of any sort). 
So, does anyone in particular have any disagreements of getting this listed as an "Anime"? Mendinso 04:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A while ago, I left a message here saying I didn't think we should consider this "anime", but I was wrong. The animation of this show was done in Japan, after all. The story and music were made by a Dutch guy and the characters were designed by a German illustrator. The rest is Japanese, as you say. So that pretty much does define it as anime. —msikma (user, talk) 22:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting this Listed as an Anime on Wikipedia 

message: ===Pikkie===
Pikkie is now referred to as a she, yet in episodes 31 and 32 (The oilrig/Atlantis episodes) he can cleary be seen having stubles on his face, a starting beard. 
Also, in the Dutch version, he is considered a male character, and the adult version has a clear male voice.
:German users are likely to revert this because Pikkie is female in the german dub. Maybe the article should point that out... -- Imladros (talk) 07:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Character description discussion

message: Pikkie is now referred to as a she, yet in episodes 31 and 32 (The oilrig/Atlantis episodes) he can cleary be seen having stubles on his face, a starting beard. 
Also, in the Dutch version, he is considered a male character, and the adult version has a clear male voice.
:German users are likely to revert this because Pikkie is female in the german dub. Maybe the article should point that out... -- Imladros (talk) 07:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pikkie

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nominator. —Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 20:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Who is the voice actor of Henk? I heard he was a communist singer. Mallerd (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: His name is Frits Lambrechts. 91.64.228.97 (talk) 21:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henk 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Alfred J. Kwak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071019012434/http://www.alfredjodocuskwak.nl:80/ to http://www.alfredjodocuskwak.nl/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alfred J. Kwak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070429235134/http://www.jodokus.nl/ to http://www.jodokus.nl/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified