Talk:Prosecutor

message: What the HELL happened with the Italian section?!? Somebody ruined it, i can't undo that right now, could you do that please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.35.131.17 (talk) 11:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You have to go to law school first and get good grades in classes in criminal law, criminal procedure, advanced criminal law, legal writing and research, advanced legal writing and research, etc.  Then you have to pass the bar exam.  Good luck.  --Coolcaesar 23:53, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article does not address the issue of independence for the public accuser's office. If the prosecutors are subordinate to the government, there is no true democracy as they will accuse or refuse to accuse people as the politics wants. Only where the prosecutors enjoy the same liberties as judges (respond only to the parliament) can people be secured against unfounded crime accusations and lenghty trials or lack of trials during which they remain locked in prison. Here in Hungary, where I live, the constitutional court declared the public accuser administration is as independent as the judicary brach. We look in horror at what US Attorney General does to keep Gitmo people in legal limbo just because the GWB government wants so. That is worse than prearranged trials in communist countries. It is easy to see why the fully independent accuser is the true fourth column of the separation of powers. 195.70.32.136 11:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the United States, district attorneys are separate from the rest of the executive branch at the local level.  That is, they are directly elected by the people independently of the other executive branch officials.  This leads to weird situations where the district attorney sues the county government and vice versa.  For example, Ventura County here in California has wasted over $1.6 million on an embarrassing lawsuit between the district attorney's office and the county government (search Google News and a lot of articles about this ongoing fiasco will come up). So we do have full independence of the prosecution at the local level (where the vast majority of crimes are prosecuted) but, I agree with you, not necessarily at the state and federal levels (where the AGs are appointed directly by the chief executive). --Coolcaesar 18:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation of powers 

message: What questions does the prosecutor ask in court when theres a case about domestic violence?
Thank you,
"357" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.75.81.155 (talk) 03:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong page.  Try Wikipedia:Reference desk. --Coolcaesar 04:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need answers? 

message: Could you guys add more examples on the prosecutor role in other countries.  Brazil's information seems to be good and conclusive but there are some such as Germany that I didn't understand better how is the role of the prosecutor in the country.  Also, there are no citations for US, UK and lots of other coutries.  I suggest a revision, maybe a table.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvarossjunior (talk • contribs) 01:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More examples 

message: Hello, I'm an Italian law student and I created a section regarding prosecutors in italy. Could you please check it out, since English is not my mothertongue?
Thank you very much.
-done :D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.18.201.160 (talk) 20:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Italy

message: I came to this article seeking an explanation of how prosecution works in the English legal system; there is no discussion here at all and I remain unenlightened. I understand that this is literally common knowledge among the English bar, but I am not a lawyer under any bar so an actual explanation would be really useful. Ray Trygstad (talk) 01:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: England

message: I have reverted you twice. You do not have consensus to add that material. The onus is on you. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: These are useful and relevant citations. I'm not sure why you have a problem with these references, but they are contributing to the article. I'm going to revert you because you don't provide any basis to delete them without just saying it's spam. Flatoncsi (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've returned to status quo ante while this is discussed. First, you don't have consensus, which is enough to trigger WP:BRD. You cannot insert material just because you want it there and don't think I provided sufficient reason. Second, the onus is on you, not me, since you're adding material and changing from status quo. Finally, it still looks like WP:BOOKSPAM to me. The subject is broad and neither of those books looks to address the subject. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Rules, with arguments no less, is it a new day in the Troutman household? Flatoncsi (talk) 15:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BOOKSPAM 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Prosecutor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081017095744/http://www.burneylawfirm.com/criminal_law_updates.htm to http://www.burneylawfirm.com/criminal_law_updates.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The competencies under the specification listed for the prosecutor are subjective, unlike what is listed on the lawyer articles. How is something subjective like a sense of justice even listed as an example of a prosecutors abilities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.50.135.6 (talk) 02:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: but iwill still  bet to get help  man's forget about them. Not anymore afairs 41.116.41.14 (talk) 03:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: and I Berg you my DNA family I need to  share with me my space 41.116.41.14 (talk) 03:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: that I sending yesterday  my plan please my justice and man's taken my house and I need to selling my house at Vaal  and boy got another house for me so he  owning more but me idont have nothing house all maj got house mbut me nothing is not fairs three pot not you see  it happen  I see reality fraud three man's to share all hoy does this abs media 41.116.41.14 (talk) 03:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: all my property it for man's and freind and baby mama  for boy abd baby mama for my father of my kids all they have luxury house and business but me nothing but it my power  man's all idont want them.all 41.116.41.14 (talk) 03:18, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't allow man's please Oberg you my   and  noma Zuma ISIN  iwill going to see her inkandla soon 41.116.41.14 (talk) 03:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: pi of Zuma 41.116.41.14 (talk) 03:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

text: and  they share my property behind my back but me don't have nothing house cars business as man's got so my power iwont share with  man's boy boss   and four and I was forget my son big one first on Glenn  sithembiso Mkhize  I for get my son in  my plan please put him.pleasetoy plan 41.116.41.14 (talk) 03:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: pi ofzuma noma Zuma is gonna guide us as  uncestours telling me  your life using Zuma family president so I got six kids but I forget him to my plan 41.116.41.14 (talk) 03:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competencies