lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SH-AWD

message: This page may be violating copyright; it contains too much material directly copied from other sources. Dragon 280 (talk) 00:22, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation 

message: The article does not seem to provide any reason why the rear axle is overdriven relative to the front.74.47.114.200 (talk) 09:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acceleration device/ Overdriven rear 

message: A lot of the sections contain info that seems to be around 2009, talking about the zdx being new and “it remains to be seen if the TL would come with the newly announced 6 speed transmission”, which it did. 74.87.101.178 (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of Date Subjects
Talk:Liverpool Personal Service Society

message: Much of this article is a copyright violation, (See: WP:COPYVIO) in that it is taken directly from the PSS web site. Rather than delete the article, however, I believe it is of suitable interest and should be re-written to avoid any copyright issues.  If you can add to this process, please do.
regards, Lynbarn 14:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
Moved by editor . Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 02:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: PSS (UK) →  – This seems to be both what all of the sources call it and a form of natural disambiguation. The only thing calling it "PSS (UK)" seems to be Companies House, turning this into a situation exactly analogous to Talk:Archaeological Services Inc./User talk:Pppery/Archive 17#CAS (formerly Chemical Abstracts Service) page/Talk:Kaiser Family Foundation, where a company has branded itself with initials but the rest of the world (and thus Wikipedia) continues to use the spelled-out name. I would also be fine with Personal Service Society, if "Liverpool" is thought of as further unnecessary disambiguation. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 July 2023
Talk:Emma Booth (actress)

message: (born c. 1982) c. 1982? Without a source? WP:OR? 85.217.23.230 (talk) 21:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And actually 1981 & 1982 are quite even in internet. I found a site stating she was 25 in June 2007, so both years fit in that. 85.217.23.230 (talk) 21:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Semik

message: Also in Germanic tradtion there is a similiar tradtion, for example in Germany (Pfingstbaumpflanzen) (de). 178.3.30.47 (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also Germanic tradition 

message: See Green week. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name
Talk:Banana boat (food)

message: delete
How do you "fill" a banana?
:Good question. I'm getting mental images of using a hypodermic needle to inject the stuff in. 90.202.110.168 16:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

message: There's no real evidence that this merits a spot in Wikipedia.  I took out the YouTube link, which doesn't count as a legitimate source.  Please provide mainstream sources. Kroyw 21:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs sourcing 

message: I've moved this section here for the time being:
:In an alternative arrangement, known as a banana banana, the banana is sliced on its side edge rather than on its concave side.  This form of the treat has the advantage that the banana does not fall over when placed on a dinner plate or other flat surface, and can easily be cooked without foil on a barbeque grill without falling over.  The name of the banana banana originates from its shape: instead of the boat-like appearance of the banana boat, the banana banana simply resembles a banana.
To me it looks like nonsense (or somebody's personal invention), and I can find no information elsewhere.  Anybody care to chime in?
-- 205.174.163.163 (talk) 16:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Banana banana'
Talk:Marine Day

message: Does this have anything to do with the Marines as in the US Military branch, or is this marine as in "having to do with the ocean"? --Micah Hainline 14:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the article - within four words your question is answered. – Freechild (¡!¡!¡!¡) 20:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your kind response, but the updates to the article itself answered my question.  At the time I asked the question, the article was unclear on the point.--Micah Hainline 03:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fajans' rules

message: I may improve this article in the near future. I have collected some useful links for the same.
# https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/64968/what-is-fajans-rule
# https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095808909
Huzaifa abedeen (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal External Links
Talk:Sankt Pölten-Land District

message: The "small characters" for villages and so on seem unusual and visually unhelpful. With each district comprising many named localities, perhaps a small font size was chosen to make the page compact but some other way of listing them could be used.--SilasW 14:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of ""small characters" 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sankt Pölten which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 10:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Nagara-class cruiser

message: The range is way too long for flank speed, presumably it is a range at some cruising speed like 15 kts that has been garbled. (The very similar Kuma and Sendai types had about that range.) TiC (talk) 00:32, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. http://pwencycl.kgbudge.com/N/a/Nagara_class.htm gives the cruising speed as 14 knots, and it looks like the original source is Lacroix and Welles, who are probably the definitive source. I went ahead and corrected it. --Yaush (talk) 15:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range 

message: the guns are not in turrets, and not all seven are centerline mounted  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.20.220.26 (talk) 11:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guns 

message: I was just looking at a model of what was supposed to be the Abukuma, and I was surprised that the model does not match the description here. That model shows six twin mounted guns in open mounts, on on the forecastle, one abaft the funnels, and one on the stern decking, presumably 12.7cm DP guns (they could even be the more modern 10cm guns like the Akizuki class, just in open mounts? They seemed quite small), along with 9 triple-mount 25mm AA guns. I know it's just a model, but it's from Japan and I have reason to believe these models are generally quite accurately rendered. Is it possible that there was a further modification, perhaps to reduce weight or increase the number of torpedoes carried, or even to make a more effective transport out of the vessel? Obviously this is no reference for an article, but does any editor know any more details about this?
Idumea47b (talk) 07:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further modifications
Talk:List of Valérian and Laureline books

message: I've noticed that the French titles on this list are capitalized using English rules, with every word except the articles capitalized. French rules are actually a bit more complicated. I will fix this. --Serpinium (talk) 18:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Benjamin Waterhouse

message: Photograph added. Eliz81 15:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great.  Looks like a good article.--Absurdist 16:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I saw the gravestone at Mount Auburn and was inspired :) Eliz81 17:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Waterhouse was actaully a bit of a rascally figure at Harvard, and this article does nothing to convey his colorful (somestimes curmudgeonly) character. Materials at the Cambridge Historical Society (notably, articles in their "Proceedings" journal) list his arguments with the school over not just the foundation of the medical school (which Warren went on to head) but squabbles over the keys to and contents of the glass display cases, which he may have donated, but the school claimed, and other issues.
Also, it might be noted that his house was for some time used as the American Red Cross office in the area, and a tie to the earlier activities in Boston related to smallpox inoculation could be useful since it is sometimes made to sound as if vaccination appeared out of whole cloth when it didn't. 
Also, the Countaway medical library at HU has a silver watch inscribed to Waterhouse by Jenner. A picture of that or a link to their site might be of interest, both as proof of their correspondence and the way collegial regard was shown by one professional to another in that time. His ties to Europe and the UK overall seem to have been stronger than those to the US, in fact.
Just some thoughts...96.237.240.126 (talk) 15:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some omissions if someone knows how to include them 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Lradrama

message: User:Lradrama
      run at Mon Jul 16 15:15:54 2007 GMT
Category talk:	1
Category:	2
Image:	6
Mainspace	1874
Portal:	2
Talk:	928
Template:	1
User talk:	1368
User:	511
Wikipedia talk:	12
Wikipedia:	52
avg edits per page	1.63
earliest	14:43, 26 January 2007
number of unique pages	2918
total	4757
2007/1 	22 	
2007/2 	174 	
2007/3 	857 	
2007/4 	596 	
2007/5 	797 	
2007/6 	1501 	
2007/7 	810 
Lradrama's editcount summary stats as of 16:15, July 16th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 15:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of Persona 2 characters

message: Hope this article doesn't get merged. A few rpg character pages meet a grim fate... Johnnyfog 15:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: c.f. List of Valkyrie Profile characters. -- Sameboat - 同舟 16:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: In Japanese version of Punishment, it's detailed that the party she would go is a "matching" party, which its main purpose is to find the target of marriage. What's the parallel term in America? -- Sameboat - 同舟 15:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ulala 

message: This article is getting really big really fast. Maybe combining the character pages wasn't such a hot idea. If it ever gets too big, maybe we should fragment them into threes. Johnnyfog 02:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the dividing is necessary, i suggest dividing P3 out of the others since there are no characters related to the past titles. -- Sameboat - 同舟 02:35, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I'll wait on that, since I already redirected this article twice today. What do I call this one? Recurring characters in Persona? That won't work.... I'll wait to see how big the P3 sections gets. Johnnyfog 15:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I shudder at the thought, but this article is too long and needs to be seperated. I regret hastily merging them into one. But at least they aren't cluttering up the game articles anymore... Johnnyfog 01:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uh oh
Talk:Song 4 Mutya (Out of Control)

message: What happened to the GOOD OLD DAYS when, as you put the above sticker on an article, you put a justification on the talk page. POV's should not be used because someone feels like it, but because they have reason. Since they fail to explain that reason, they should have their POV taken off them! GRRR 220.238.131.240 15:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: beginning sounds distinctively like Cars (song). I wonder why it isn't mentioned. --Leladax 14:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cars 
Talk:Froland

message: Froland is listed as a village on List of villages in Aust-Agder. If there is a tettsted by the same name as the municipality, this should be elaborated upon in the article and it should also be categorized into :Category:Villages in Aust-Agder. __meco 09:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Froland village 
Talk:Gjerstad

message: The article is categorized into :Category:Villages in Aust-Agder and is listed as a village on List of villages in Aust-Agder. If there is a tettsted by the same name as the municipality, this should be elaborated upon in the article. __meco 09:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gjerstad village 
Talk:Aerians

message: Bravehearted, N.B.:
"Do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with this page’s proposed speedy deletion, please add:
 
to the top of this page, directly below this tag, and then explain why you believe this article should not be deleted on its talk page."
Thanks.
SECisek 15:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion

message: Very good!  A proper solution. --SECisek 05:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

message: are thre simmilar laws in any states if so what states and what are the laws and are there pages about them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.7.247 (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Artical feels very biased towards the pro camp. Perhaps there are literally no oponents... 172.215.104.91 15:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be entirely because of a cut off sentence in the against section. Jon 15:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro bias

message: Is there a US-federal-government website giving status-information on proposed legislation that is currently being considered? -- 213.178.69.186 14:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website on current legislation status

message: I'm rating this article as class C, because it doesn't say anything about the impact of the bill over the past year, and also because there must be some way to use templates or infoboxes to make this more readable.  This bill is mentioned in the Obama agenda but isn't his specifically, so I set importance Low. Mike Serfas (talk) 07:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:OBAMA assessment 

message: this article is not very informative about the substance of GINA.   It might be nice to have some section summarize the provisions allowed and not allowed in GINA.  --98.70.54.81 (talk) 17:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  article (currently) not very informative
Talk:1992 Major League Baseball expansion draft

message: A number of citations in this article unnecessarily include the publisher for periodicals and websites that have their own Wikipedia article. This information has no value to anyone wanting to check or track down references. For example, publisher=Washington Post Company for references to The Washington Post, or publisher=MLB Advanced Media for references to MLB.com, only make the article longer - significantly longer when repeated many times - without adding anything useful. Therefore I plan to  upgrade the article's citations to remove all such redundant publisher info, bringing them into line with the recommended use of the cite template (see Template:Citation#Publisher).  I'll also remove redundant 'location' parameters (e.g. work=New York Times|location=New York), as suggested by the template's usage guidelines. Please raise any questions here or on my talk page. Colonies Chris (talk) 15:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed removal of redundant publisher information
Talk:Kvalsund Municipality

message: Det vil stå "Fálesnuori" noen steder, men det er akkusativ og genitiv. Nevneform er Fálesnuorri. --Misha bb (talk) 13:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fálesnuorri - ikke Fálesnuori 
Template talk:Drug control laws

message: Drugs are not necessarily therapeutic goods, and therapeutic goods are not necessarily drugs
Maybe the template should be at Template:Regulation of therapeutic goods
I am unable at present, however, to see a way of making it a useful template
The subject seems just too diverse
Any one country is likely to have a variety of different related laws and agencies, and these are unlikely to correspond neatly with those of other countries
Laurel Bush (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move template?
Talk:Legendary Heroes

message: #REDIRECT Talk:Yu-Gi-Oh!
Why is this page redirecting to Yu-Gi-Oh!? I can't find anything in the series that is similar in title to "Legendary Heroes". I think it would be more accurate to redirect it to the "Legend of Heroes" series, as that's at least a close title. (That's actually what I typed in by accident, got the redirect, got really confused...) Daft Inquisitor (talk) 23:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Wendy Davis

message: Wendy Davis sent in an updated photo which I replaced today. In some cases, it would be appropriate to poll the editors to see which image is best, but I think there is little doubt the most recent one is a superior photo. Of course, if there is disagreement, we can poll for consensus.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 21:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image
Talk:Nordic model

message: Finland still holds a notable gender pay-gap; on average, women only receive 83 cents for every euro a male counterpart gets.
I believe that claiming that people in the same role of different genders have a pay gap of about 17% is not stated in the article but that over the whole population with all kinds of different jobs there is a average wage gap of 17%, so think it should be something like this:
Finland still holds a notable gender pay-gap; women only receive 83 cents for every euro a male get, if you mix together all kinds of different jobs and compare the gender pay.
I'm not the best with words but i think it should not miss represent the article and some how give of the feeling that it is not about all jobs give less money to females. 81.226.1.77 (talk) 00:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I could not quite follow your comment, but I updated the relevant section of the article. I hope this clears up any confusion. Actualcpscm (talk) 18:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 November 2022 

message: Their policies quite don't look like those of the 4 others... 2A01:E34:EC12:36C0:F5CC:5AD4:A1F5:2FD3 (talk) 15:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you please provide more detail & citations? Peaceray (talk) 16:50, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iceland is nordic, but is not part of the nordic model.
Talk:Stiff Kittens

message: I have changed a few details for the track listing section today and was wondering why it was reverted back? Everything I entered was factual.
Pixelclear 19:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Revisions 
Talk:IPCC Fourth Assessment Report/Archive 2

message: The article's description of the report's conclusions states:
#The probability that this is caused by natural climatic processes is less than 5%
#The probability that this is caused by human emissions of greenhouse gases is over 90%
I'll address the 2nd one (90%) first.  Here is the statement from the IPCC SPM (bottom of page 10):
Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.
The "most of" part of this statement was lost in the Wiki article.  The "since the mid-20th century" may not be necessary, since we're attributing cause to the unequivocal fact that global warming is occurring.  Occurring is in the present tense, so this is fine.  If the statement were that global warming has occurred, I think the temporal context - "since the mid-20th century" would be important.
The 1st statement (the 5% one) is less clear.
Here are the actual IPCC SPM statements, again from page 10.
...it is extremely unlikely that global climate change of the past fifty years can be explained without external forcing, and very unlikely that it is not due to known natural causes alone.
extremely unlikely means <5%
very unlikely means <10%
It is unclear to me what the difference between "external forcing" and "not natural causes" is.  Even if we assume that 5% is the correct number for the statement being made, I think that it is important to qualify the statement with the use of the word "alone":
"The probability that this is caused by natural climactic processes alone is less than 5%"
In short, the statements together should say that it is >90% than human caused GHGs are mostly responsible for global warming, and that it is <X% that natural causes alone could have done so.
I won't make the edits myself because I'm new to Wikipedia.
Mishlai 20:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to wikipedia Mishlai, those are two very good proposed edits and i think you should change the article to that effect. Hypnosadist 21:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  I made most of the changes.  Looking for further sources on the higher expected sea levels, and trying to sort out how to word that to convey the meaning without overstatement. Mishlai 03:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement wording nitpicks
Talk:John Rae (economist)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --VernoWhitney (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Template talk:Places in Tyne and Wear

message: The piped link for "metropolitan borough of Gateshead" had the same wording both sides of the pipe.  Changed this to |Gateshead as the navbox area only has one urban area in "big"  letters.   Left "city of sunderland,  as one of the 3 areas in smaller font  is sunderland bärlinerchat 16:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Albion Swords

message: I agree that the product description sounds like blatant advertising, it needs to be revised.  There is no reason we need to display price information on Wikipedia.  This can be found on the company's website.  What should be given is information on the product lines they manufacture, such as film-swords, and the museum line.
A section should be added detailing their Lanze Fest event in New Glarus as well.  I will try and revise/add to this page when I have time, maybe next week. 
Starbuckt 19:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product Prices 

message: I'm sorry, but this whole page reads like an advert to me
Can I ask why it hasn't it been considered for deletion ? Guthroth (talk) 14:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It cites a reliable source.  That would be at least a hint at notability. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 19:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising
Talk:Limited

message: What's missing here: the meaning of "Limited" in north american train names (such as the Amtrak Capitol Limited and Lake Shore Limited). --84.115.129.76 16:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Limited" in train names

message: This is very much Abdinaasrstar (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abdinaasir
Talk:SiriusXMU

message: How the hell does this page constitute a Speedy Delete??? 170 other XM Channels have a page!--NightRider63 16:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Delete