lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Longspine snipefish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Slender snipefish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Gordano Valley

message: Gordano → Gordano Valley – i.e. keep but reverse the redirect. More descriptive/accurata/complete name, plus it frees up Gordano for future disambig purposes should anyone want to write an article on the Gordano Mway services, the Gordano National Nature Reserve, Gordano School etc SP-KP 08:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support  --ajn (talk) 08:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request.
Vegaswikian 06:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support  --ajn (talk) 08:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Add any additional comments
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request.
Vegaswikian 06:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Diocesan chancery

message: A similar function exists within the Anglican church.  David Underdown (talk) 12:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited to reflect this. -- SECisek (talk) 12:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anglican church

message: There are reports about the existence of lay female chancellors in certain dioceses. This should maybe be mentioned in the article, along with a legal examination on how this relates to the norms set forth in canon law (cf canon 483). However, the current article appears to suggest that there are no specific rules on the issue, meaning that this could be acceptable in appropriate circumstances.  ADM (talk) 07:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lay female chancellors

message: This article is a copy, or is based on a copy, of the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia. This makes it rather out of date. For example, the article states that there's noting in the "general law" about diocesan chanceries. That may have been true in 1913, but the 1983 Code of Canon Law and the 1990 Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches both go into diocesan chanceries, what officials are called for, their responsibilities, and their requirements. A complete rewrite may be needed. Gentgeen (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date
Talk:Banded bellowsfish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Crested bellowsfish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Apostolic Camera

message: I think that the Catholicism Project evaluation of "C" is generous, but plausible.  The evaluation by the (moribund) Roman Curia and Vatican City Projects of a "B" is unrealistic.  There is no referencing with appropriate citations.  The supporting materials are almost non-existent.  There is no Bibliography or "For Further Reading" section.  Content MUST be verifiable.  I have therefore reduced the evaluation to a "C".  --Vicedomino (talk) 04:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:Brucella melitensis

message: Hello,
Although your article is short, it contains a lot of information. If your about to find it, try to include information about the parasites life cycle. You should also include information about its morphology, reproduction and its geological distribution. Make sure that you capitalize Ovine brucellosis. Also, is the only transmission of this disease through stable flies? What drug is used to kill this parasite? Your sources are good as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ooluw003 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Unua Libro

message: Warsaw are not in Russia. This is a Polish city (capital), not Russian even if Russian exercised power over Poland in XIX century.
:Russian, the language. The link points to the language and not the country. I fixed the text.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 12:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Warsaw

message: How could it happen, that the translation of Julian Steinhaus was in very poor English? 
Was Steinhaus a foreigner? --Hans Eo (talk) 15:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure. To discuss things like this though, one should look to Esperanto forums. This is merely a place to discuss the article, not to discuss the book itself. Michipedian (talk) 04:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very poor English 

message: It would be extremely helpful to have an image of Dr. Esperanto's International Language, the 1888 Geoghegan English translation. If anyone has access to that, please upload the image to Commons. There are currently images of the Steinhaus and Phillips translations on Commons, but since the Geoghegan translation is the preferred standard English translation of this book, it is far preferable to have that image than either of the other two, and I think an image of that translation in the infobox would clear up a lot of confusion about this book. Michipedian (talk) 10:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Disregard this, as I have since located the image! Michipedian (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Geoghegan translation (''Dr. Esperanto's International Language'')
Talk:Showgirl: The Homecoming Tour

message: This article doesn't appear to cite any sources for its information. Could the original author make mention of where the information has come from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neenish Tart (talk • contribs) 01:40, 5-12-2006
:The main playlist and tour dates also appears at the Official programme which I have, as I saw the New Years Eve concert, therefore that bit on Celebration is correct. I will cite them as reference later in the week when I can. Willirennen 21:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Is it true or not true that Kylie was upset when the performance had to be cut short on that night as I have been told by a friend as I am feeling tempted to add this in but there is no source for it? Willirennen 00:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manchester Cancelled Shows 

message: Why is this noteworthy enough for a whole article?  Why is this not a footnote on the singer's page? 69.64.10.242 15:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article exist? 

message: any idead on what was the short introduction to slow? kinda remix or smth more specific?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.197.8.94 (talk) 18:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  slow (homecoming intro) 

message: Please do not add original research to the article. All claims MUST be sourced with a reliable source. Thanks! -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 16:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References..... 

message: On September 17, 2011, Status redirected the Showgirl: Homecoming article to the Showgirl: Greatest Hits article. He also cut/paste the information from here to the Showgirl: Greatest Hits article as well. I reverted this edit as I feel there should have been a discussion in place, FIRST, before any changes we made. Please feel fee to add your thoughts. Itsbydesign (talk) 13:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging S:THT with S:TGHT
Talk:Khalid Skah

message: There seem to be some wrong information in the article. It says that 1997-2001 he was banned from international competitions... but in 1998 he won bronze in the half-maraton World championships. See  --SM 08:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Athletic achievements

message: I've cleaned up the paragraph on the ongoing custody and criminal cases, and added some references. Currently there are multiple rumours circulating, including accusations made by both parties in news media in their respective home countries. I don't think any of this should be presented in this article, until it has been confirmed by reliable - preferably multiple reliable - sources. Charlie | talk 13:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Verdens Gang article has been updated (changed) since my last visit, so I added a reference to an article in another reliable newspaper. Charlie | talk 07:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal life
Talk:HMAS Armidale (J240)

message: ----
Two books have been written about the sinking. Of the two, the more comprehensive is HMAS Armidale, the ship that had to die , a second revised and expanded edition called: HMAS Armidale Lives On  was published to coincide with the launching of the second Royal Australian Navy ship to carry the name, HMAS Armidale. 
The other book on the ship, Armidale '42, a Survivor's Account , is by Don Watson, in collaboration with Colin Madigan one of the survivors. The book includes 10 sketches by the artist Jan Stenbergs, inspired by the sinking and subsequent heroic voyages to safety by many of the survivors.
----
I've removed this section from the article as the publication of books on a subject should not be a sub-subject of the article. These books should be used as sources for information, not advertised in the body of the article. -- saberwyn 11:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Published Works section 
Talk:John Mack (musician)

message: I have added his New York Times obituary as a link. Capitalistroadster 08:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Champagne Supernova

message: The sentences "Noel Gallagher got the title when he misheard the name of the Pixies album Bossanova" and "Noel came up with the phrase "Caught beneath the landslide" when he saw a sugar jar in his girlfriend's kitchen. You can see this peculiar jar in the disk booklet where the lyrics are printed." are completely swiped word-for-word from this site. 68.8.108.62 02:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarised text

message: I dont think this is considered Oasis's magnum opus, surely that title would go to Live Forever or Wonderwall.
:Well, Wikipedia defines Magnum opus as "the largest, and perhaps the best, greatest, most popular, or most renowned achievement of an author, artist, or composer." So it depends on how you interpret it. The only one of those not to be subjective is "largest", and it's certainly not the longest song Oasis have recorded, as All Around The World, I Am The Walrus and D'You Know What I Mean are all longer. "Magnum opus" isn't mentioned anywhere in the article at the moment, and i think that's how it should stay. It's too subjective a term to be in an encyclopaedic entry. Julianhall (talk) 13:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Magnum Opus?

message: Isn't it? --91.178.252.115 (talk) 12:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Psychedelic Rock

message: In the music video, I see that a small wind instrument with a keyboard is played. What is this instrument called?
A Mellotron, I believe.
:It's not a Mellotron. As you will see from the image on the Mellotron page, they are certainly not small wind instruments. I can't remember what the instrument looks like on the video, but it could be a Melodica? Julianhall (talk) 08:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the instrument is a Melodica. But, there is one overlooked fact over this part of the song that is completely burned in my memory: the guy behind the Melodica solo, what's his name, steals the middle-eight from Alanis Morissette's "Hand in My Pocket." So folks, do you think Morissette could sue even for this small bit of theft? WikiPro1981X (talk) 01:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrument Used? 

message: Seems doubtful. See here. As there are no sources in the Persoannel section, I think it should be removed. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melodica?
Talk:HMAS Attack (P 90)

message: http://www.australiandefence.com.au/news/future-submarines-named-attack-class-as-spa-completed
Sammartinlai (talk) 03:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, we can update Collins-class submarine replacement project. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: ? ? Change of name for SEA 1000 required? Buckshot06 (talk) 18:52, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems sensible (bit odd that the RAN has re-used the name of a patrol boat for what will probably be its most powerful ever units!) Nick-D (talk) 05:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oops posted in wrong article but Nick-D made the move anyway.Sammartinlai (talk) 04:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named Attack-Class
Talk:Thread pool

message: Where is the actual pattern?
This may be lack of my english skill but in all but 2 of the (excellent, please keep them) external links this is referenced as "threadpool", not "threadpool pattern".  Suggest: Move to threadpool :Leuk he 19:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

message: rename to thread pool?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.26.47.142 (talk) 04:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: This article has ZERO cited sources (with a box from 2009!) and as can be seen on the talk page, even the content is questionable. I would suggest an essentially complete rewrite starting with good sources from whence relevant parts are cited into the article, with complete refs. Basically this would allow scrapping all of the current article piece by piece.  91.154.87.201 (talk) 14:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality and validity of the article
Talk:Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Bedroom

message: Why is this list important? BhaiSaab talk 18:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its discussed in the media and refered to by other Wikipedia article. The topic is highly relevant within the context of the Islamic feminism movement , and it is a topic worthy of coverage.--CltFn 21:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: What does "vanguarded" mean? AnonMoos 00:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "vanguarded"
Talk:Fishcake

message: Not all fishcakes are prepared using breadcrumbs or batter on the outside.  Also, the article had no mention of salted fish being used in their preparation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.89.198.168 (talk) 00:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: in asia, fishcake is quite a different food altogether (as compared to the one described in this article) Chensiyuan 09:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are fishcakes like in Asia? Tell us, then we can point out the difference in the article. Nietzsche 2 (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Asia

message: This article needs work. LET'S GET TO IT, BATMAN!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.148.114 (talk) 00:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moo moo cow?

message: Would bacalaítos be considered fish cakes?
:Yup, seems like the real thing so added it to the list. - Takeaway (talk) 10:10, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bacalaítos

message: The text, as it is now, is very much written from a British perspective. Just having non-British examples in the list below is not enough. - Takeaway (talk) 21:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Worldwide view

message: Brizzro (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korea 

message: This article begins by saying that a fishcake is similar to a croquette. I would have thought it more accurate to say it is similar to a fish finger, except for the fact that fishcakes are normally round and fish fingers are normally rectangular. Vorbee (talk) 17:51, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Similar to a croquette?

message: * Due to lack of sources, I've merged Fish slice (basically a fishcake that is sliced?) into Fishcake. Notes are on the Fish slice talk.
* Since Fish slice is now a redirect, Fish slice (kitchen utensil) should be moved to "Fish slice" as it is the new primary topic.
* There is nothing to salvage in the current Fish slice page, so I propose a deletion unless there is something else that should be done.
Cheers, Estheim (talk) 22:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-merger Name Cleanup
Talk:Old Kentish Sign Language

message: There is absolutely no evidence that this sign language ever existed. It is mere speculation based on some discussion in a book by Nora Groce on Martha's Vineyard Sign Language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.82.61.13 (talk • contribs) 
:Could you elaborate? i guess you are talking about this book about Martha's Vineyard Sign Language:
:*Groce, Nora Ellen (1985). Everyone here spoke sign language: Hereditary deafness on Martha's Vineyard. Harvard University Press. .
:I haven't read it but I believe that the author suggests that a sign language was brought to New England from Kent by a group of related families with a high degree of hereditary deafness, whose descendents developed Martha's Vineyard Sign Language. OKSL has also been identified by the Summer Institute of Linguistics (see the Ethnologue entry), and listed in Gallaudet University's sign languages page.
:However, I did find this quote: "There has been the suggestion that the sign language [that emerged on Martha's Vineyard] would have been some form of “Old Kentish Sign Language”. This needs to be treated with caution because no deaf people were part of the original migration from Kent, and nothing is known about any specific variety of signing used in Kent." (From Multilingualism: The global approach to sign languages, by Bencie Woll, Rachel Sutton-Spence and Frances Elton, in "The Sociolinguistics of Sign Languages", Edited by Ceil Lucas, Cambridge University Press, ).
:What do you suggest is changed on this article, if anything? ntennis 04:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now added the quote from Woll et al. ntennis 05:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the information! Please edit the article if you think it is incorrect. I will also try to have a look for the book and check the other sources. ntennis 01:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you for your thorough explanation. I would agree to keeping the article with some changes being made. I do not have access to the references you mention, which are subscriber only. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 10:39, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Existence
Talk:Islam in Maldives

message: The article states "There is a widespread belief in jinns, or evil spirits.", implying that this is not a part of mainstream Islamic belief, when in fact the existance of Jinns is mentioned many times in the Qur'an (examples As-Saaffaat 37:158, Ar-Rahmaan 55:15, Al-Hijr 15:27 and many many others). I don't know anything about the situation in the Maldives concerning other deviations from orthadox Islam, but the specific example of belief in Jinns should probably be altered. Perhaps a more knowledgeable editor could attempt it?--128.40.76.138 09:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited it, attaching the belief in jinns to the use of charms.  Many Muslim countries have different types of charms still... but, I don't know enough about this either. gren グレン 10:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Late Universal Century

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've heard a lot of talk from various places that Gaia Gear, G-Saviour, and Hathaway's Flash (though that last one doesn't effect this article) are non-canon stories (Hathaway's Flash was considered to be non-canon, due to the fact that many events sparking it come from the Novel Beltorchika's Children which was replaced by the Movie Char's Counterattack, and therefore created some discontinuities between them). If anyone can cite this information then feel free to edit the article, but don't do so until you can site them. --71.245.245.54 10:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Canon and Non-canon