Talk:Arnaud de Borchgrave

message: Numerous critics contend that the Times, which is owned by Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church, itself spikes stories viewed as left-leaning in order to impart a right-wing bias to its news pages. 
These critics include Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, whose web site quotes DeBorchgrave's admission in a May 6, 1987 Washington Post article that the Times loses money and is subsidized by Rev. Moon. Rev. Moon also admits, even brags, that he has poured hundreds of million of dollars into the money-losing paper in order to create a newspaper that has "a distinct conservative outlook - or more correctly, [a] God-centered outlook."
----
Not sure where the above belongs. Is it a POV arguing that the premise of The Spike is incorrect? Is it mere tit-for-tat, saying "we're not biased but you are"? How can we make this text neutral? --Uncle Ed 19:55, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: why is a bunch of stuff copied from http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Arnaud_de_Borchgrave ? we need to add sourcing to satisfy GFDL... Sasquatch  t|c 23:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy 

message: The section about how the TImes has grown influential in Washington is BS.  According to this list (http://www.accessabc.com/reader/top150.htm) the times is the 114th most popular newspaper in America.  Considering the fact the Washington Post is the 3rd and the Times has never turned a profit seems to indicate this article is heavily POV biased.  
The statement that de Borchgrave caused the Times to become "more influential" in Washington politics is vague, unsourced, and quite honestly not true.  Even if the circulation has barely increased, that says nothing of causation, especially for a paper that has never come out of the red.  The Times is a marginal paper with a anemic readership.  While I suggest that someone put in a section comparing the Time's circulation to other papers in smaller markets (San Antonio Express News, Sacramento Bee, Fort Worth Star Telegram ect) at the very least I am taking out the part about it "increasing in influence."
Cfoster05 04:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bunk 

message: The article says, "In 1947, he was appointed Brussels bureau chief for United Press International." UPI didn't exist yet at that time. Presumably he was working for one of its predecessors, United Press or International News Service. I don't know which one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pha telegrapher (talk • contribs) 02:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: UPI has been around since 1907, or so they say. GrizzledOldMan (talk) 23:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UPI in 1947? 

message: These edits are clearly WP:BLP violations - WP:WEIGHT, WP:COATRACK, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, etc, etc. "Bogus" is a defamatory and potentially libelous word to use in a BLP.
Please read WP:BLP guidelines before making edits to BLPs. GrizzledOldMan (talk) 22:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP violations removed 

message: Probably not, as I doubt Counterpunch is a reliable enough source for allegations about BLPs, but for the record, I've just discovered this article: . It alleges that de Borchgrave, essentially, distorted the truth in the runup to the beginning of the Iraq war in 2003. Robofish (talk) 21:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure if this is worth including 

message: For reference and possible inclusion:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
Thoughts? MastCell Talk 20:00, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for plagiarism allegations 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Arnaud de Borchgrave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071027110606/http://www.c-span.org:80/homepage.asp?Cat=Series&Code=WJE&ShowVidNum=9&Rot_Cat_CD=WJ&Rot_HT=206&Rot_WD=&ShowVidDays=100&ShowVidDesc=&ArchiveDays=30 to http://www.c-span.org/homepage.asp?Cat=Series&Code=WJE&ShowVidNum=9&Rot_Cat_CD=WJ&Rot_HT=206&Rot_WD=&ShowVidDays=100&ShowVidDesc=&ArchiveDays=30
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A bunch of citations go to a speakers' bureau site, which is hardly reliable. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak references 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Arnaud de Borchgrave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091006052459/http://csis.org/expert/arnaud-de-borchgrave to http://csis.org/expert/arnaud-de-borchgrave
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511131538/http://www.theglobalist.com/AuthorBiography.aspx?AuthorId=1193 to http://www.theglobalist.com/AuthorBiography.aspx?AuthorId=1193
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is an omission somewhere in the description of A d B's parents or grandparents. RichardBond (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genealogy section