Talk:Blogosphere

message: INCLUSIONISM! Lotsofissues 06:18, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 29 to May 6 2004, consensus was to keep.  Discussion:
The article strikes me as gibberish (mythology?), and wikipedia is not a dictionary or a glossary of slang anyway.  Non-notable.  Delete.  Falcon 01:43, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)
*Keep. Pretty sure I've heard this term before, and blogs are a very important cultural phenomenon circa 2004. Everyking 02:12, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD Archived debate

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 02:48, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: *Blogion
*Blogdex
*Blogdigger
*Bloglines
*BlogPulse
*Blogrunner
*BlogsNow
*Blogwise
*Feedster
*Plazoo
*PubSub
*Technorati
:I had it in the article preview as a level 2 section, but I've demoted it to level three to maintain sectioning in talk. Creating articles for those that are important enough and trimming out those that are not would make the article better and improve the projects coverage. --GraemeL (talk) 14:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not every link in wikipedia needs to be an internal link either, it is fine having these as external links.   there is no reason not to do so.  I do agree though that the ones with internal pages can be linked internally. --Buridan 15:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll remove all of those sites from external links and create the section with a mixture of blue links and external links. --GraemeL (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Blogosphere sites 

message: The tracking section seemed to be an odd place for a definition of what blogs are, as well as a place to talk about Forbes' coverage of marketing via blogs. I condenses the section to talk about tracking of conversations/memes, and aids for scholars who want to research flow of conversation.  If we want a larger discussion of how the blogosphere might also be a "sphere" for marketing, such language needs to be re-worked. --mtz206 16:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracking 

message: I removed this phrase: "A network of blogs, then, becomes a living, constantly evolving and updating network of knowledge."  This seems like puffery, and not very encyclopedic. There is nothing inherently "living" or "evolving" about the blogosphere. It is a network of dynamically-linked sites, not some mystical organ of knowledge. --mtz206 02:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  April 20 edit 

message: This was in :Category:Computing portmanteaus, but I'm pretty sure "blogosphere" doesn't qualify as a portmanteau.  It's just "blog" with a suffix on it. ~ Booya Bazooka 08:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portmanteau? 

message: Changed "in order to" to just "to."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikkiking (talk • contribs) 20:14, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: I think this is a very interesting article and immediately am thrilled to be one of the observers for the 'blogosphere.' The first paragraph is great in presenting a simple, yet full explanation about what the term actually means. I am a little concerned that there is no references or citations here as it does not seem like this definition is common knowledge. There history section is well put together. The neat citations really gives much legitimacy to the information. I assume this is still a work in progress (?) and so far I think you guys are off to a really nice start.
Dwc86 (talk) 01:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Observations 

message: This article looks great so far, and it's impressive that you didn't get deleted right away, especially since this is an article that is attached within wikigroups to a larger collection of articles maintained by more dedicated editors. The thing that I liked most about the article were all of the different links to terms like "community" that you used without defining, so that if readers don't understand what is meant by these terms there is an easy and highly visible way to check it out. This comes back in the later section of Niche Blogging, which allows readers to immediately see examples of the types of niche blogs you discuss. I'm wondering if it might be beneficial to have an explanatory sentence or two about what exactly a niche blog is before giving examples of them. I'd also of course like to see more examples of niche blogging, but I think that you will be expanding this anyway in the future as the article develops. Good work!
stc62 (talk) 13:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Observing 

message: An image used in this article, File:Blogosphere graph 1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Blogosphere graph 1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: After much deliberation, I am adding Health blog under the Blogging niches.
I have noted that there are most other major genres of blogs but health. Blogging niches are as many as interests are and thus the need to include  health blogs to the list. ApparentLifestyler.  (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion of Health blog

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Blogosphere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iw3p.com/DailyPundit/2001_12_30_dailypundit_archive.php#8315120
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://technorati.com/blogging/article/day-4-blogging-revenues-brands-and
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071127060435/http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/EXPORT/DL/38960.pdf to http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/EXPORT/DL/38960.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Blogosphere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713203310/http://www.lexingtonbooks.com/Catalog/SingleBook.shtml?command=Search&db=%5EDB%2FCATALOG.db&eqSKUdata=0739116711 to http://www.lexingtonbooks.com/Catalog/SingleBook.shtml?command=Search&db=%5EDB%2FCATALOG.db&eqSKUdata=0739116711
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111027230905/http://technorati.com/blogging/article/day-4-blogging-revenues-brands-and/ to http://technorati.com/blogging/article/day-4-blogging-revenues-brands-and/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified