Talk:Catechism of the Catholic Church

message: The text reads: 
American Catholic bishops have stated that, though theological opinion was not intended to be a part of CCC, it in fact "does not distinguish between matters of faith and theological opinion."
This is incorrect. 
The Bishops Conference did not claim that the Catechism confuses theological opinion and matters of faith and doctrine. That was a criticism of the Catechism leveled by a theology professor who is not a bishop. Here's the  text cited in footnote 20, which can be found here: http://www.christendom-awake.org/pages/catechism/flawed-expectations/fe-ch6.htm:
"As one instance of how a typical member of the current theological establishment views the Catechism, we may take the views of Fr. Francis Buckley, S.J., a professor of systematic and pastoral theology at the University of San Francisco. Fr. Buckley was one of the Woodstock group of scholars who attacked the draft catechism in the book entitied [p. 207] The Universal Catechism Reader, which, as we noted in Chapter Three, found the draft "fatally flawed".2 His negative view of the completed Catechism proved to be equally pronounced. In an article entitled "What to Do with the New Catechism", Fr. Buckley declares that "it would be a mistake to hand the text of the new Catechism to everyone. It does not distinguish between matters of faith and theological opinion." He probably means the Catechism teaches as part of the doctrine of the faith things the new theologians consider "opinion" and hence subject to change by them."
````Fr. Daniel P. Moloney — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.111.126.45 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for correcting this tremendous error! --Zfish118⋉talk 18:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theological opinion vs. doctrine 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Catechism of the Catholic Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140531175312/http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651118_dei-verbum_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651118_dei-verbum_en.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Catechism of the Catholic Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130312145145/http://old.usccb.org/sdwp/national/criminal/catechism.shtml to http://old.usccb.org/sdwp/national/criminal/catechism.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080913014703/http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/index.shtml to http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/index.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This is not a translation of editio typica.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.227.229 (talk) 14:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you elaborate on your concern? Are you referring to the Catechism being a translation from the Latin, or are you talking about the translation of the word "editio typica" itself? –Zfish118⋉talk 17:05, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: typical edition

message: Does the information about the glitches on the Vatican website deserve to be mentioned in the article? Veverve (talk) 12:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see this vital to the article, but it would be worthwhile to post about on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism. We have a lot of links to the catechism website that might be impacted. –Zfish118⋉talk 01:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this information notable? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :New Catechism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#New Catechism until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New Catechism" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]