Talk:Experimenter Publishing

message: Swtpc6800 asked me to take a look at this article, so here are some notes.  I'll expand this list as I go through the article.
*Over the years several dates have been given for the first occurrence of this advertisement. Even Hugo Gernsback used the wrong date (January 13, 1906) in a 1938 issues of his magazine, Radio Craft.  I'd suggest moving this text to the footnote; most readers won't be interested in the history of the incorrect date, but it's worth preserving in the footnote -- which is where a reader who thinks the date is incorrect will look.
*(See a 1916 Electro Importing Catalog and a 1920 Electro Importing Catalog..)  A couple of comments here.  First, they both appear to be advertisements for catalogs (from Electrical Experimenter and Radio Amateur News respectively), rather than actual catalogs. Second, I'm not sure how relevant they are to the article.  They might fit better into articles about those magazines themselves.
*I'd suggest adding a sentence to the end of the "Origins" section mentioning Experimenter Publishing, so that the reader understands how the subject of the article relates to this section.  Perhaps just carrying the story on to 1915 would do it; that is, move the first paragraph of the next section up to the "Origins" section.
*This tangle of investments would become an issue in the 1929 bankruptcy.  I think you can cut this; the reader doesn't know yet what the 1929 bankruptcy is.  If you want to keep it I'd change it to something like "This tangle of investments later became an issue for Gernsback when he was forced into bankruptcy in 1929."  Is the assertion that this approach to investing was part of the reason for the bankruptcy obvious from the facts?  Or is it supported by a direct quote from a source?  I'm not as familiar with the bankruptcy as you are, so it looks a bit like it might be a personal opinion.
*It continued to publish fiction stories.  The only prior mention of fiction is Gernsback's novel.  I think you should describe the contents a little, earlier on, and make it clear that fiction was published regularly (or every issue, or whatever was the case).
*You have several paragraphs missing sources; it's a good idea to include at least one source at the end of the paragraph.  That's enough if essentially all of the information to be sourced comes from that one source.  There's an unsourced paragraph in the first part of the "Magazines" section, and three more in the "Other publications" section, for example.  Another thing you can do is create a source that refers to the individual issues of a magazine.  Primary sources are frowned on in some circumstances, but they're fine for specific details such as title changes and dates of publication.  (It's good to get secondary sources for those, too, but not always possible.)
*Radio News and its direct successors, Electronics World and Popular Electronics, were published until 1985.  This makes it sounds as if Electronics World and Popular Electronics were two independent magazines.  It might be better phrased as something like "Radio News was published until 1985, though the title was changed to Electronics World in [year] and then to Popular Electronics in [year]."  Or if this is more detail than we really need at this point, how about "Radio News, under various titles, was published until 1985."?
::Done. Radio News spun off Popular Electronics and changed the title to Electronics World in the 1950s. They merged back into one magazine in 1972. That is too much detail; I just said the title was changed to Popular Electronics in 1972. I went with "under various titles". The Radio News article has the complete story. -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 02:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Mike, I will remove all see image links a make a small picture gallery with 4 or maybe 8 ads. I am finishing an article on WRNY radio and their first television broadcast in August 12, 1928. I will have this done in a day or so. I will then return to Experimenter Publishing. -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 03:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome; it's an interesting article.  I think it has the material it needs; it's just a question of organization now, and a bit of prose polishing.  I'll read it a couple of times more and may add more comments later.  After you've taken another pass at it, I'd suggest taking it to peer review next. Mike Christie (talk) 11:18, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review comments 

message: I don't see a mention of where the mags were published/headquartered. Can I presume NYC, same as WRNY? (BTW, it's interesting & well written, just a few minor gaps in coverage. :) )  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  21:36, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting electrified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Experimenter Publishing. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for //http:/www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues/2004-09-03/feature1/index.html
*Attempted to fix sourcing for //http:/www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues/2004-09-03/feature1/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Experimenter Publishing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues_2007/2007-06-01/feature2/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues/2004-09-03/feature1/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues/2004-09-03/feature1/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues/2004-09-10/feature1/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues/2004-10-01/feature1/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704174902/http://home.utah.edu/~u0202363/hugo_pub.pdf to http://home.utah.edu/~u0202363/hugo_pub.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues_2007/2007-06-01/feature2/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues_2007/2007-07-06/feature2/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified