lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Specification pattern

message: There is no citation or reference of any kind with the criticisms. They may be valid but seem to be the opinion of the author. --4.14.21.30 (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does criticism come from? 

message: I've created a PNG image of the UML diagram using Dia specifically for this page.  Use it if you like.
--IToshkov (talk) 11:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Second that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.21.189.24 (talk) 20:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  UML diagram 

message: The text is confusing at one point, and talks about a previously implemented class, which is not linked or shown anywhere.  It looks like this may be copied from some other source, and as such may be plagerized.
"We previously defined an OverdueSpecification class"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.146.43.241 (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content Doesn't make sense 

message: I'm no C# guru but wouldn't one prefer to write
    ... && !currentInvoice.NoticeSent && ...
instead of
    ... && currentInvoice.NoticeSent == false && ...
? Uligerhardt (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison with false
Talk:Meat raffle

message: "Minesotan tradition" ?!? Meat raffles have been going on in all sorts of countries for decades. I'm going to change this. Any objections? user:jimjamjak 09:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure you're not thinking of something else, like Chook raffle? Ewlyahoocom 16:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I have reverted your edit, which deleted all reference to meat raffles and meat draws in the UK. Meat raffles are extremely common in many UK regions - most Oxfordshire pubs have weekly meat raffles, for example. If you wish to remove substantial amounts of any Wikipedia article, please propose the changes on the talk page first so that other editors can comment beforehand. --Ef80 (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

message: I've removed the stub templates. Although the article is still pretty basic, it's been expanded beyond WP:Stub. --Ef80 (talk) 18:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: Can somebody competent write something about the history of what seems -- to me -- an exceptionally-strange tradition? In the same way that strangely-spelt words in English often 'make sense' once the etymology is revealed, perhaps meat raffles will seem 'less weird' to those of us for whom they're not a familiar experience.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:1D00:327:C411:A7BB:996F:6572 (talk) 15:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Meat raffles seem to have originated in English pubs serving poor communities before the twentieth century. Ordinary people couldn't afford meat on a daily basis, but they would buy a lottery ticket in the hope of winning a meat prize. The pub landlord would arrange the raffle to attract customers. Migrants took this tradition to North America and Australasia. I don't have a good ref for this so won't add it to the article. --Ef80 (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Could someone merge this with Chook raffle ?
It's pretty much the same thing but done with chicken.
121.222.1.50 (talk) 07:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Barossa Range

message: The official name is Barossa Range. (Property Location Broswer ID SA0004778: "Name:Barossa Range; Derivation of Name: A location in Spain; Dual Name: Barossa Range / Yampoori; Other Details: Named by Colonel Light in 1837 after a location in Spain being the site of a battle won by Lght's friend Lord Lynedock in 1811.") This should be fixed and moved over the redirect from Barossa Range. Donama (talk) 23:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: --Scott Davis Talk 04:38, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Official name
Talk:Hewett, South Australia

message: The 'Hewett Shopping Centre' contains the 'Best' Chicken shop and the 'Best' Bakery, in South Australia
Although 'best' is used in quote marks it's a subjective topic, and a claim made by pretty much every chicken shop and bakery in South Australia. this reads distinctly like an advertisement and is pretty irrelevant to the page and should probably just be removed - Solarence (talk) 04:46, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hewett Shopping Centre
Talk:The Citadel of Thunder

message: This article is unfinished and should be deleted.--Gavin Collins 09:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Adjustments now made. Compsword00 (talk) 12:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing sections

message: This articles needs a lot of work to get it up to RPG Project and Wikipedia standards. It will take time to dig the original book from storage but that should shed some light on the actual page count and other things.
- Dicecollector29 (talk) 03:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Work remaining
Talk:Surface finishing

message: Agreed that this still needs work, but processes like sandblasting and shot peening are clearly not coatings. --Mud4t 09:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Diffusion is NOT coating. Yannjp 11:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree that coating is a part of surface finishing but not all surface finishing are coatings. at the beginning of the article the difference is clearly given between adding material or modifing mecanically or by other means the surface properties of a bulk material. so even if surface finishing is more broad subject, I think that "coating" is a more common word that deserved to have its own article Sacre djo (talk) 11:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[Coating]]

message: What about glazing and vitreous enamel? Can they be included too?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.210.203 (talk) 14:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added them. Wizard191 (talk) 21:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glazing and Vitreous enamel 

message: A thin film is defined as "fractions of a nanometre to several micrometres in thickness".  Many processes such as electroplating are usually used to generate thin films.  They are often used to generate much thicker coatings such as the hard chrome plate on a bulldozer hydraulic cylinder rod.  Galvanizing seems to primarily refer to hot-dipped galvanizing of steel or iron (in the US at least).  Hot-dipped galvanizing coating thickness is in the tens to hundreds of microns (millimeters in heavy marine parts).   Galvanizing probably should not be categorized as a thin film.  Zinc plated refers to a thinner film of electrodeposited zinc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim1138 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thin-Films 

message: Knurling does not seem like a finishing process to me. Wilhkar (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends on the application. If the knurling is used to increase the gripping ability or aesthetics of a surface then I would call it a surface finish. Wizard191 (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knurling 

message: I've taken out some advice language from the last section, but in doing that noticed that this seems to deal exclusively with metal finishes.  Since the article is called "Surface finishing" maybe something should be changed here.  Either rename the article or the headline for this section.  I'm pretty certain the described methods aren't employed in surface finishes for other surfaces (e.g. glass, wood, acrylic etc.)
99.11.160.111 (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the section title to "metal surface finishes". Wizard191 (talk) 19:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surface finishing or metal surface finishing?
Talk:Seacliff, South Australia

message: I only discovered by accident that this article is currently the subject of a university assignment, after I'd already done a round of copyediting, which I wouldn't have done had I known it was a work in progress. However I also had a bit of info I'd been working on about the Kaurna names, with quite a bit of detail I didn't want to forget about or lose, so I have now added that. I don't want to fiddle with it any more until the student editor has finished with it, but will just note here that it might be worth mentioning the location of the Seacombe creek and a general description/geography section, as mentioned in the Indigenous in the history section. You can see it here. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject of an assignment
Template talk:Infobox dot-com company

message: with  should be added to this redirect.Also, it was template-protected before it was merged with . Perhaps it’s time it’s unprotected as there’s no reason the redirect page should be protected. Interqwark talk contribs 14:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Regarding protection, this redirect is used on 1600 pages and it can still be vandalized thus causing problems on all those pages. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. Interqwark talk contribs 14:45, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request — 6 June 2018
Talk:Parafield, South Australia

message: Exactly what is the CBD? Am I the only one that doesn't know? Dreambeaver (talk) 07:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't like acronyms such as these. You are allowed to change them Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CBD
Talk:Edinburgh, South Australia

message: "Edinburgh" appears in an Australian biographical article about John Alexander Dowie, as his birthplace in 1847.  It probably means the Scottish city, but I checked this article to see whether Edinburgh, Australia, existed then.  There apparently is no entry in the "infobox" for a date of any kind, and it would be informative to know when Edinburgh came into existence. Unfree (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of founding
Talk:Cabaroan, Bacnotan, La Union

message: *The original version of this article incorporated text from the article Cabaroan, Bacnotan, La Union at en.wikipilipinas.org, a GFDL licensed website. -- But|seriously|folks  10:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: There should be more information added to this article or this page may as well be deleted.  If any user has more information to this article, add it in the article and cite your work.  Thanks.-BlueAmethyst .:*:. 20:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted? Eh, I suppose it was time.-BlueAmethyst .:*:. 02:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About This Article
Talk:Ridleyton, South Australia

message: I heard from a longtime resident of the area (via one or two other people) that Ridleyton was once part of Croydon but was made a separate suburb a few decades ago. Does anyone know anything about this or know of any reliable article that may be cited? After all, as reliable a person as she may have been, my partner's nanna might be a little out of place in a list of references.
--Lincolncooper (talk) 08:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Once part of Croydon?

message: I started the community section in this article for info about Ridleyton as a community of people. I suggest local community groups could be mentioned here. Does anyone have any other suggestions?
--Lincolncooper (talk) 08:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Community section
Talk:Psalms of Asaph

message: The author of this article is excessively polemical and a bit unbalanced in his paragraph dealing with C.H. Toy's view of the Psalms of Asaph.  For example, "Toy asserts that the assignment of Asaph in the titles is worthless," is better put: Toy views these superscriptions as late scribal additions and unreliable guides to the original author(s).  The following critique of Toy is excessively pejorative: "Had Toy bothered to read Franz Delitzsch , who published on this topic almost 20 years before him, he could have saved himself the trouble of writing his own article. Of course, Delitzsch wrote in German (even more of a requirement for 19th century CE scholars than it is today), and the English language version of his opus did not appear until after Toy’s fatally flawed piece was put to print."  How does the author of this article know that Toy did not read Delitzsch?  Toy's lack of interaction with Delitzsch in his own presentation is not a reliable indication that he was not familiar with Delitzsch's view.  It is highly prejudicial to suggest that Toy had not read Delitzsch simply because the latter's work was in German.  The voluminous body of Toy's work throughout his career displays a tremendous amount of interaction with German scholarship.  The polemical tone of this paragraph needs to be edited out because it detracts from an otherwise helpful article.
:Strongly agreed!  Following WW:BB principles, I have removed most of this... that is, most of the article, and added a 'unref' template and reduced the article-issues issues to an 'unref' template. Hopefully future expansion of the article can be of higher quality, included sources. Feline Hymnic (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author 

message: Hello, this article was tagged as unreferenced. The article does have references, but they are mentioned by the author's last name throughout the text. I'm too lazy to hunt these down myself. LovesMacs (talk) 02:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs list of references
Talk:When a Child Is Born

message: The German singer Michael Holm had a hit with 'Traenen luegen nicht' (Tears don't lie) in 1974.
The melody is exactly the same however the text is not a translation from German into English.
Can we assume that the song 'When a child is born' was based off this song?
Almost so: both english and Michael Holm's german version are based on the instrumental melody "Soleado" written in 1974 by Zacar (aka Ciro Dammico), who was the leader of the italian group Daniel Sentacruz Ensamble.--Fm974ge 19:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A melody from 15th century? I can not believe. --Gerhard Atze (talk) 08:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The band's name is Daniel Sentacruz Ensemble, not Santecruz.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srelu (talk • contribs) 00:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspeling 

message: Much of the information contained here should rather go into Soleado, since many versions cited here are not the Christmas song, but independent versions of "Soleado".--Biologos (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Soleado]]
Talk:Parafield Gardens, South Australia

message: Hello, I have read this page and I feel like there is more information that could be included in this article
For example: there are actually more than two small, local shopping centres (strip malls) that I know of… one located on Catalina Avenue and another located on Andrew Smith Drive. There is also now an Aldi located on the corner of Kings Road and Lavender Drive
Thank you for taking the time to read my suggestion!
With warmest regards,
Parafield Gardens resident 2001:8003:B10C:F001:1180:748E:A62B:63FB (talk) 14:38, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capturing the full story of Parafield Gardens
Talk:Amoskeag Manufacturing Company

message: hai i am student.i want your compay chart (e.g 1.chairman 2.managers etc) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.43.166.14 (talk) 10:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: here - no restrictions upon its use. Parrot of Doom (talk) 00:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: image

message: Why is there a 1909 picture of Elm Street on this article? It does not, so far as I can tell, show any Amoskeag buildings, since they were closer to the river. It may belong on the Manchester article, but not here. I'll remove it unless somebody objects. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elm Street picture -why?
Talk:The Fall of Doctor Onslow

message: I believe this article would be greatly improved by trimming the plot synopsis a great deal; it is very overly detailed and contains many spoilers.-PetraSchelm (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot synopsis very overly detailed

message: All of the below should really be trimmed to a few sentences.-PetraSchelm (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: overly long synopsis moved to talk
Talk:The Coffee Trader

message: I have written an extended plot summary for the novel. It would be interesting to add it perhaps some additional historical detail about seventeenth century Amsterdam and its Jewish community during this period. Ivankinsman (talk) 20:19, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: There are some review snippets at the author's website. If someone wants to go track down the reviews these come from, that might give some more material for the "critical reception" - I wouldn't use the blurbs selected by the author, but the whole reviews might prove useful. -Kenirwin/(talk)  14:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional critical reception
Talk:Anglican Diocese of Worcester

message: I did not assess this article for the Middle Ages project, as I'm not sure that an Anglican diocese is strictly speaking within the Middle Ages Project's scope. Ealdgyth | Talk 04:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whilst the whole article may not be within the scope of that project, members are probably better placed to expand on the history of the diocese than many others.  From that point of view however, it's not evena  stub.  David Underdown 11:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This article (rightly) discusses the diocese from its foundation in the seventh century, but as this means that the diocese was actually a Catholic one for most of the period covered by the article is the title of the article (and the one at Roman Catholic Diocese of Worcester) not misleading? Would the articles not be better disambiguated geographically? JimmyGuano (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was still a diocese of the English Church, which is ultimately the derivation of Anglican, until the Reformation, taht ws in communion with the Pope, afterwards it wasn't.  David Underdown (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree with JimmyGuano's point: the matter of the diocese's Catholic history needs to be covered somewhere, and appropriately indicated. I propose that this article be renamed to something like Diocese of Worcester (England), its content divided into Catholic and Anglican sections, a For template be added to disambiguate it from the American Roman Catholic diocese's article, and a For template be added to that article to disambiguate it from this one. -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 02:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The city of Worcester is the prime usage and for other uses there is the Worcester (disambiguation) page. And so this article should be moved back to Diocese of Worcester and for other uses a Diocese of Worcester (disambiguation) page created. It works fine with Norwich and Diocese of Norwich as the prime usages, each having their own disambiguation pages. Scrivener-uki (talk) 02:09, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Anglican Diocese of Birmingham - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 21:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The count of parishes and churches in the body of the text, and that in the infobox are at variance. I am not sure which is correct, however. Malpensilo (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Count of Parishes and Churches contradictory
Talk:Big Shots (TV series)

message: Is this show an American version of the BBC program "Manchild".  Sure seems like it.  Probably worth mentioning if this is the case.
Cast of characters goes a bit too much in detail with irrelevant information, but that's just my opinion. This show is a male version of Desperate Housewives.  Range 12:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Cancellation rumors are flailing about the internet. Do you think they're worth mentioning?
No credible source has been given that the show is cancelled, therefore it should not be said on this page. As you can see, none of these statements have any sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.4.111 (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancellation 
Talk:Arminiya

message: *Support the merge proposal. VartanM (talk) 08:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I suggest making the primary title of this article Principality of Armenia, far more scholarly references. I can hardly find any to emirate.-- Ευπάτωρ Talk!! 21:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal

message: This article contains red links. Arabic Wiki articles are available for some of them:
* 
* 
--Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 07:10, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links 

message: The lead and the title specifies that this article covers Arminiya, which included the principalities of Armenia, Iberia and Albania but the article itself ONLY covers Armenia and there is a separate article for the Principality of Iberia which was part of Arminiya under Arab dominion?-- Ευπάτωρ Talk!! 10:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the scope of this article? 

message: The title of ishkhan has no relation with the Turkic/Mongolian word 'khan', as the attestion of the word predates the arrival of the Turks. Otherwise sources such as Jones, Lynn (2007). Between Islam and Byzantium: Aght'amar and the Visual Construction of Medieval Armenian Rulership wouldn't have used the term, as it would be anachronistic. Moreover, this is also what the source says; "The title ishkhan ishkhanats‘, rendered as ‘presiding prince’ or ‘prince of princes’, appears for the first time in John Catholicos’ account in reference to Bagarat Bagratuni, uncle of the future king Ashot I" - page 2, note 3. The author John Catholicos (Hovhannes Draskhanakerttsi) lived before the arrival of the Turks.  --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ishkhan
Talk:Toynbee Hall

message: In the matter of the qualifications to C. R. Ashbee and Jane Addams, this is a particular stylistic issue. 
See for example Appositive Phrase : Definition, Usage, Examples for the way these come up, when writing is taught. The appositive phrase, however, is not specially suitable for Wikipedia writing. Particularly when it qualifies a link to an article, it can be fairly much redundant: if the reader seeks more information, it is there via one click.
The appositive phrase actually gets a mention on p. 179 of How Wikipedia Works (PDF). I wouldn't say it was banned here, but there needs to be an informative reason it is needed. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Appositive phrases

message: It seems to me that the lead paragraph should emphasize "Toynbee Hall" as a social-services organization and not a building. After all, the building was constructed to house the organization. Unless I hear arguments to the contrary, I plan to edit the lead. I'm not sure what to do about "Infobox building", however. Should it be changed to Template:Infobox organization? --Jeremy Butler (talk) 15:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foremost a Building or an Organization?
Talk:Chicken piccata

message: You should have a generic article on 'piccata'.
:O.K. I'll request it at WP:RA, and we'll work on it later. Bearian 18:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Piccata

message: Piccata is an italian word, what does French have to do with anything?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 17.102.120.116 (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: French protein?
Talk:Incheon Station

message: The Japanese version of this page has info. regarding the expansion.
[] JPBarrass 11:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 