lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Can't Take That Away (Mariah's Theme)

message: @Smarty9108: The American commercial image on top. This fits the song and the singer nationally. As for the other image, you are using the American promo image. I assumed it was European image, but I realized it's one of promo CDs—American one. The REAL European image has words on the same cover (but in different angle). I don't know what the removed image was, but I'll assume it's the European one. (Never mind, it's not the same) We don't wanna use promos unless the single has not been commercially released. --George Ho (talk) 02:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever works for you.   troublednbored (talk) 02:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  What's your point? --George Ho (talk) 02:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Both covers are official. I just think the screenshot from the music video is more well-known. It is also used on digital retailers including 7Digital https://us.7digital.com/artist/mariah-carey/release/cant-take-that-away/ troublednbored (talk) 02:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would rather not use digital reissues of the cover. I want scanned images, plain and simple. Also, I'd avoid promos unless not commercially released worldwide. --George Ho (talk) 03:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox images
Talk:Tillamook Treasure

message: Wp:wwin#Wikipedia_is_not_a_propaganda_machine. 24.17.48.241 05:45, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are involved with the promotion of this film, please read up on conflict of interest guidelines. I'm sure it is a fine film, but Wikipedia is not here to provide free advertising for your film. Continued additions of long lists of film festivals and awards will probably continue to be reverted as being advertising and unencyclopedic. This wastes my time and yours. If you wish to add such information, please bring it up here on the talk page so that it can be considered by other editors. Thank you. Katr67 22:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine

message: Editors regularly clean out undiscussed links from this article.  Please discuss here if you want a link not to be cleaned out regularly.  (You can help!) Katr67 20:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discuss links here
Talk:À la lanterne

message: "La Lanterne" simply means "the lantern" in French. It does not seem to refer to any specific lantern, but only to the public lanterns of Paris. olivier 06:06, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, but I don't think it qualifies for CSD. And things like this ("a la lanterne") suggest there may be something useful to be said about how lampposts were used in the French Revolution. If you don't want to leave it, you could redirect it or AfD it. You might ask the user who created it, too (User talk:Wackymacs). Rd232 talk 10:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, let us leave it for the time being, then. olivier 10:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Malayalam triumvirate poets

message: Any references for the claim?  --AMorris (talk)●(contribs) 06:19, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The link above is dead.  We need to add references to the article, not just the talk page. RJFJR (talk) 17:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Cyprus stubs

message: There are two reasons for adding this stub as well:
# A number of editors of geographical articles search for stubs to expand primarily on the type of item rather than location.
# It is easier for WP:WSS to judge if and when a separate Cyprus-geo-stub will be needed. 
Grutness...wha? 06:16, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A separate stub template has since been created. Please disregard the post above and use  for the geographical material. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 21:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Euro-geo-stub
Talk:Sonia Belmont

message: The refrences you edited out were actually to a Konami Timeline printed in an issue of Nintendo Power in the last year or so. I thought I was clear to point out that Konami of America at first did not acknowledge Japan's timeline in that timeline, but have recently conformed to to the Japanese timeline in their most recent extreme timeline.
It was merely for historical note to point out that there have been changes in Konami of America's views in the recent years.
When I find a copy of that timeline do you have a suggestion where I can post it in order to point out the history behind Konami USA's take on the series.
Please don't suggest I put my own views into it the post. Infact it was quite neutral, and just stating historical facts on the issue. Infact I actually was editing someone else's post on the matter that did not quote any sources for his viewpoint, and correcting him about the Xtreme Timeline.
May I suggest you get an account so that I can leave you messages? The fact that you post on anonymous IP makes it difficult to leave any messages to youDraculvania 05:11, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline Changes
Talk:CFU758

message: Would you kindly explain what the point is of your repeated edits?
It is a requirement of Wikipedia that articles link to other articles. You do not have the right to remove square brackets from around words in the article. And you do not have the right to remove an article from the categories it's filed in unless they're wrong.
As well, Wikipedia articles cannot refer to a person as a "creative genius" or to the station as "amazing"; those are biased assertions. Wikipedia has to stick to objective and verifiable facts. And, incidentally, ravfm.com is currently a dead link that brings up an ISP registrar's pseudo-search engine. So even that has to be taken off the article now.
And finally, you use the discussion page to talk about matters relating to the article; you are not to insert personal notes to other Wikipedia editors in the article itself (except as hidden comments if necessary.)
Despite your note about "this is truth from the source", the dispute isn't about facts; you haven't changed any of the cited facts at all. All you've done is remove the wikilinks, the categories and the text formatting over and over again, even though Wikipedia policy requires that those be present. So my question remains: why do you insist on doing that? Bearcat 02:42, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To the anon editor
Talk:Mamiya

message: Hmmm... Time to post some information about the cameras themselves? From the Super Deluxe all the way to the RZ...
:Please do! Fg2 10:52, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote an RZ67 article based on my own experience with RZ's. I'll post something about 645M later too. piksi 14:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also corrected some of the spellings of the model names. RZ and RB models are officially written as R*67 ABC DEF, for example RZ67 Pro IID. It is much easier to find information of the cameras with the correct model names. piksi 15:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

text: That'd be great! Thanks Fg2 05:57, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Camera updates

message: https://www.dpreview.com/articles/1970037207/phase-one-buys-mamiya-gains-ownership-of-camera-and-lens-production
http://www.takesontech.com/medium-format-camera-makers-mamiya-leaf-merge
http://www.macnn.com/articles/12/01/16/medium.format.camera.makers.mamiya.leaf.merge/
The website of Mamiya Japan does not work.84.229.35.42 (talk) 09:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated  

message: The Mamiya brand is being revived in the UK. The trade mark has been acquired along with the the domain name by company in the UK. Also articles on Mamiya RB67 and RZ67 cameras is incorrect and written by "fan" and "enthusiasts" who do not have access to data and facts from the brand owner. Some information is subjective not objective. Opcouk (talk) 12:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to update: Revival of Mamiya brand and take over of trade mark and domain
Talk:Mark Kozelek

message: Would it be alright to add that he score the 2001 movie Last ball?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212298/
According to the imdb, Kozelek was born in 1967.  As a high school classmate of his, I believe this is more accurate than the 1969 listed here, as I don't think he was 2 or 3 years younger than the other students in his class.  Since 1967 is documented, and it agrees with my personal memory, I'm changing the listed date of birth from '69 to '67.
"obsessed" does not seem to be an objective word -- suggest changing to "highly focused on"
SALVADOR SAAAAANCHEZ  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.93.110 (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scored Last Ball 

message: The controversies section is well-developed and supported by reliable sources and does not constitute "false and defamatory material". If you wish to object, discuss it on this talk page. And do not make legal threats on Wikipedia as you did here. Οἶδα (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: the so called controversies section of this article is ridiculous. questionable sources, no legal relevance, no relevance whatsoever. wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a log book in which self-proclaimed moral guardians and denunciators create detailed lists of micro-transgressions for each biography. wikipedia also does not serve to defame living people on the basis of daily changing catalogs of micro-aggressions that are circulating in some echo chambers. an enzyclopedia does not serve to archive non-verifiable transcripts of conversations that are held on the sidelines of some concerts or discussions at the supermarket checkout. abuse of online encyclopedia by internet trolls is progressing rapidly, this development is worrying. Oawi77 (talk) 05:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies section
Talk:Order of the Coif

message: I added an image of the Order's key, an infobox with standard information fields, address, colors and number of chapters.  Cracking into this it also allowed an opportunity to write a History section, which until now had been lacking in the Wikipedia article.  While some of this was adopted from Baird's 20th, most of it is taken from the Order's own History article on its website.  I think I've treated it fairly; members, especially those who know the early history may want to review how I'd summarized the transition from Theta Kappa Nu into Order of the Coif, as part of the negotiation that firmly settled the young Northwestern chapter as part of the group.  It seems this 1911 convention was pivotal, with a very satisfactory negotiated outcome. Jax MN (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision and History section
Template talk:Tools

message: Removed:
*Notifications:--~~~~, --~~~~
-- Zondor 07:13, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 

message: Please vote and/or comment at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Exclusion.2C_Template:Inclusion-Section.2C_Template:Exclusion-Section. Thanks. :) -- infinity0 18:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfDs for three templates 

message: Since P.R. dumping seems to be a recurring problem I would like to suggest a new tag something like the POV tag called PRD which will warn readers that the article reference may have been modified to cast positive or negative "public relations" spin. Wjbean 18:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: if you can still read this today and think that this is still relevant, please consider requesting it at WP:RT.  Thanks, —PaleoNeonate - 06:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New tool 

message: The document linked to in "The templates and their effects are shown in list of Boilerplate text" is historical, so the line should be removed. 
Also, should  be listed here? Maybe also  on a separate line? Thanks! --Geekdiva (talk) 10:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done —   and  added.  It seems that the boilerplace text was already removed.  Thanks, —PaleoNeonate - 06:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

text: I actually removed  since the existing Message templates link points to those (and a number of other template toolboxes).  —PaleoNeonate - 07:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boilerplate text is historical 

message: I'm intending to remove this navbox from template documentation. My understanding is that the purpose of this template is to be a convenience to users in utilizing the templates and pages contained within it, as opposed to a way of navigating from one such constituent to another. As such, even though it uses the navbox template for form, it's not strictly a navbox in purpose and, accordingly, it fails all five criteria in WP:NAVBOX. I don't think removing it from template documentation will have a detriment to its purpose, therefore. But before I proceed, any other views? --Bsherr (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaning from template namespace
Talk:Grand Duchy of Jeuno

message: I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to move (not copy) articles to another wiki..
Maybe when http://finalfantasy.wikicities.com/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Jeuno has updated content, it could be added as an "External Link"?
Eug 07:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This was actually discussed over at the Final Fantasy WikiProject talk page. I'm not sure why you think it's not a good idea, either, as the transwiki process is hardly new. The simple fact of the matter is that this article is on a subject not really notable for Wikipedia, and it doesn't belong here. – Seancdaug 15:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Tioman Island

message: The ferry from Singapore does not any longerrun to Tioman.
--Skinjob 07:20, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ferry from Singapore

message: Even though I agree that the building projects have a negative impact, the article is highly biased a needs to be rewritten in a more neutral style. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.6.54 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 14 November 2005
:Agreed, I will remove some of the worst of it. --Apyule 11:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias
Talk:Electric boat

message: See the battery-electric vehicle talk page for more information. (Under nr 58; requested move)
Thanks.
If the name sounds too cumbersome/silly (aldough its most accurate), we may atleast try to change the name to "Electric water vehicle", or "Electric watercraft" as electric boat only involves boats (thus limiting the article's possible expantion)
KVDP (talk) 08:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to 'Battery electric water vehicle" 

message: The 1980s anime The Mysterious Cities of Gold had a really interesting concept of ancient civilisations using a gigantic solar ship with sun sails called The Solaris which additionally used the sun as a war weapon. --EvenGreenerFish (talk) 02:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture ? 

message: MV Yara Birkeland needs to be added to the list of electric ships.--98.128.228.237 (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The list requires that the ship is in scheduled continuous commercial operation , which has not yet happened. TGCP (talk) 01:13, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MV Yara Birkeland
Talk:Irritation

message: Bold text
<== The whole "wrong tone" thingwhat can i say but turn your head to the side priya. ==
6 am 12/9/2006
exacerbate : to make thing worse (shaun)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.226.12.115 (talk) 09:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Exacebation" redirects here 86.186.230.133 (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

message: Exacerbation is not the medical term for irritation.
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/exacerbate
Can a medical practitioner or like-apt scientist verify this? Thanks α_MCCCXXXVII_† 21:10, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree - this is wrong. It's a flare-up, episode or worsening of symptoms - as in RA, COPD, MS. Hildabast (talk) 23:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exacerbation 

message: Why is there a page for a feeling? Wikipedia isn't supposed to have pages for stuff that can only be figured out by people and animals.--Trisha Gaurav (talk) 03:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irritation
Talk:Shakir al Khafaji

message: The wording of this article is biased and POV. My attempt to neutralize the wording has been reverted without motivation by TDC. Otto ter Haar 07:35, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: RE: In 2004 he [Al Khafaji] was reported by the Wall Street Journal to have received cut price oil from Saddam Hussein and to have helped bankroll the lobbying activities of former weapons-inspector turned anti-sanctions activist, Scott Ritter...
This sentence implies that Shakir al Khafaji contributed to Scott Ritter's film directly with oil money from Saddam Hussein. There is no evidence for this position. Al Khafaji was already a wealthy American businessman, so why do we assume it was OFF money that helped fund the project? It is my intention to break this sentence up. — eon, 23:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scott Ritter
Talk:Paul Soldner

message: Added material about Paul's retirement and the "California School".  Source is direct interviews with Paul at Scripps.  Sadly, Scripps used Paul's retirement to dismantle the ceramics department; while they still host the Annual, it now is chaired by guest professors because you can't do pottery at Scripps. Jberkus 07:40, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here are some google news archive searches that yield hits on this artist. Most of them are pay-per-view, but citations can be made from the abstracts.
*Archive search 1969-1971
*Archive search 1993
*Archive search 1997-98
*Archive search 2001-02
- Crockspot 20:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source leads 

message: I've done what I can for now, started a general tidy up and added a couple of decent references but this article really needs to be worked on by people with a knowledge of the subject.--Plad2 (talk) 08:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More work needed
Talk:Tim Regan

message: On people pages is it OK ( i.e. good form ) to add in other people with the same name ( e.g. me http://research.microsoft.com/~timregan/ ) to a links section at the end of the page? Dumbledad 07:43, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Seal (mechanical)

message: What is a "non mechanical seal"?  Also seems like we should explain the difference of sealing a rotating axis in a pump shaft or boat screw, versus just a gasket in a pipe flange.  Also content is very listy.TCO (Reviews needed) 16:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with what the comment above in such that the articles effectively describe the alternate heading. However, the articles should rather contain the correct information... LGreiner (talk) 15:10, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs work 

message: Listed in the Seal types is 'Coating', but that is not explained in either this or the coating page.  Ha there been some confusion with sealing a surface by means of a coating?  If that's the case then it doesn't belong in this entry on Seal (mechanical).  I'll delete unless someone knows more.
Gravuritas (talk) 22:29, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coating? 

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:seal (emblem) -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 10:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: {{noredirect|seal (device)}}
Talk:7:30 Report

message: Delete - I prepared it in response to a request on the Australian portal page. The page named "The 7:30 Report" is better.
:eek, thats my fault i put it on the WP:AWNB, sorry about that Agnte 09:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: and the reason i missed it is because of the use of the colon --- (7.30 Report, The 7.30 Report, 7:30 Report, The 7:30 report) etc, and thats an easy mistake to make - i suggest we just Redirect Agnte 09:16, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George Harrison Shull

message: Has anyone read papers by Shull? What an arrogant man.
--------------------
Heterosis- Effect/Hybrid Vigor
Was published in 1909 and not 1908!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.95.82.23 (talk) 20:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WKHQ-FM

message: #1? In the ratings books cited, they are #3 in their market behind WTCM and WKLT-WKLZ, the latter is simulcast on 2 frequencies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.72.215.225 (talk) 20:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

message: Talk:WKHQ (FM) → Talk:WKHQ-FM — Orphaned talk page -- official calls are WKHQ-FM. JPG-GR 05:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved --Stemonitis 12:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. JPG-GR 01:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:WKLT

message: I just removed a large part of the article. A lot of the content consisted of rumours and other biased information. If you want to expand this article with facts, please do so, but remember to use credible sources and only add information that's verifiable for other editors! Thanks, JoanneB 15:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I keep adding the history in, it appears sound, keeps being reverted, additionally, mentioning the "opinion" of listenrs during the 1990's, certainly is permissable under wiki's npov standards, I can live without reference to the personalities at the station, but that WKLT is out of the mainstream of Rock radio stations for it's heavy classics playlist as well as the ownership history are verifiable, NPOV items..66.72.215.225 20:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "It appears sound" is not good enough... Sentences that start with "rumour has it" are not the kind of content that an encyclopedia should have! There are a lot of facts in the part of the article that I deleted, and yes, those are very possible verifiable, NPOV items, but could you please provide the source for what you're adding? I do not nescessarily want to keep this article the stub that it is (and of course I'm not the one deciding what an article should be like), but if any facts are added, they should be based on something other than just the memory of listeners. Is there a book or a website that could be referred to? --JoanneB 21:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the history? 

message: I am removing much of the viewpoints expressed in this article.  History that is verifiable remains.  MarkElliott 02:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History without a point of view
Talk:WSRT

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for the aperture synthesis interferometer in the northeastern Netherlands is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the telecope. - Dravecky (talk) 11:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: Vandalism of these pages will not be tolerated.MarkElliott 14:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism will not be tolerated

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support but to the correct dab title of WSRT (FM) Vegaswikian 17:41, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The lead paragraph is what the subject currently is, not what it used to be - and should not contain digressions like translators, which few people in the general public even understand.   The entire article is full of unsourced "inside radio" unsourced material and speculation, with a "warning" not to vandalize the page, meaning the editor has not read the basic documents about editing wikipedia pages.   I have no time for reversion wars. 69.37.68.72 (talk) 04:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please rewrite