lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rupert Degas

message: Oops. I just reverted a change to Rupert Degas, and muddled up the details in my edit summary. Clarifying here just in case anybody noticed the inconsistency.
Somebody had changed birth date to 1960 in the article. IMDB says birth date is 1970, and he played a "schoolboy" role in 1985, and played a "student" role in 1992. Therefore I think 1960 is a pretty unlikely birthdate and I reverted article to the previous 1970 version.
Unfortunately I got this wrong way round in my edit summary, saying "Hence birth in 1970 seems improbable, reverting to 1960". If you saw this and were baffled, it's my fault, sorry. If you never noticed the edit summary, you can ignore all this :-)
Bobrayner (talk) 22:13, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, no worry - thanks for the correction. The date was definitely correct, as I think the subject started the article himself a few years ago anyway! Bob talk 22:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is standard on Wikipedia to list the works created by an artist. It is why they are notable, as creative professionals, their works. We list books by authors, acting roles by actors, albums and songs by musicians, painter exhibitions, etc.. as for sourcing, we could track down individual sources for each work to prove they in fact did this thing, but then the article will have dozens of spammy sources and look like a COI case and that would be not be helpful. Rather we can link to a single primary source, Degas's website, to verify they did this work. Primary is acceptable for basic facts: they appeared in a film or made an audiobook, we do this sort of thing all the time to help with verification. If there is some reason to believe Degas's website is unreliable, then it would not be a reliable source, but someone would need to show evidence why we can not trust the site for these particular facts. Again, we use primary sources all the time for basic facts. -- GreenC 16:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography of works
Talk:Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet

message: There is some history on the instrument in the church.  That would make a good addition to the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.183.193.44 (talk) 18:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Organ

message: If no-one objects I'm going to delete the following uncited material in a few days.  Of course, if citations do appear I will not delete this:
* the Society of St. Pius X attempted to occupy another church in Paris, St-Germain l'Auxerrois.
* In 1978, the Cour de Cassation confirmed that the occupation was illegal, (the fact that they were told to leave is cited by the next footnote, it's the Cour de Cassation that will be removed)
* On February 20, 1987, the Conseil d'État ruled that the disturbance to public order resulting from an expulsion would be higher than that resulting from the illegal occupation.
* , several executives of the Society of St Pius X were accused of disseminating anti-Semitic propaganda at St Nicolas, but were found unguilty.
* against the wishes of the Socialist Mayor, Bertrand Delanoë, who considered it an internal matter for the Catholic Church,
* remarking that the Archbishop of Paris had not requested that the Society be expelled.
JASpencer 15:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited Material

message: This section needs further elaboration by those familiar with the subject. Who was the parish priest and why was he "expelled"? In other words, what was the conflict about that caused members of the Society of St. Pius X to take this unusual action? Is the "occupation" of the church still in effect to the present day, and what do the "occupiers" hope to achieve?  JGHowes   talk 01:20, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1977 occupation and consequences 
Talk:Typhoon Muifa (2004)

message: No, no trivia please. If it's important enough it should go in the storm history. – Chacor 15:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, I think I can incorporate the fact that so many tropical cyclones struck the Philippines into the storm history. Oh, also, can you help me adding the JMA info to the article? íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 15:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: JMA Best-track: http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/rsmc-hp-pub-eg/Besttracks/bst2004.txt – Chacor 15:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I hope I read it right. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 17:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There. I think I've got enough info. I'll try and look for thailand damage. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 01:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Major copyedit needed, some bits aren't written really encyclopedically. – Chacor 02:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

text: There's also a missing reference. – Chacor 02:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Kinda added explanation for weak steering currents. If it's not much of an explanation, that's all I found, and that's that. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 23:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:Dissymmetry of lift

message: #Dissymmetry of lift exists or occurs across any kind of rotor in translating flight.
#This article sounds more like a proof than an encyclopedia article discussing an aerodynamic condition of rotorcraft flight.
#Anyone reading this article will be most likely end up more confused due to the amount of errors in the article.
I was gonna redirect part of another article to this one, but I am considering just filling out the section of the other article instead. I won't edit this article, I would prefer to start over from scratch. --Born2flie 05:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; the "analysis" graded as an epic fail for its (in)ability to communicate its subject to the general reader.  I've re-written it, just about completely.  My version probably isn't perfect, but I hope it communicates better. Feline Hymnic (talk) 15:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis 

message: It is said in this page that lift created by an airfoil is proportional to the airspeed. But I think the dependance is quadratic as said in this page Lift. It does not change the conclusion anyway...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.75.182.173 (talk) 10:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  lift proportional to airspeed?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ingelbert Lievaart

message: Wow, shows you what happens when you don't watch a page. I am sorry but I did try to write a good article about a London photographer with a bit of notability here in London Ontario. Now I don't feel like writing any more about notable or semi-notable London people. YOur arguments were valuable but the information I had was all I had from my research. WayneRay 15:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Constructor University

message: Im Mai 2014 wurde bekannt, dass die Jacobs University in Bremen-Grohn 65 Stellen streicht.weser-kurier.de: Jacobs-Uni streicht 65 Stellen Die Betriebsratsvorsitzende [chair of works committee] Gabriele Graf verteidigte gegenüber Radio Bremen die Position der Uni-Präsidentin:  --Reiner Stoppok (talk) 16:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  programmatic realignment 

message: In part it is written as an advert, in other parts it is not objective. In general, this article does not have the tone of usual wikipedia article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.55.2.230 (talk) 01:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does not feel as an encyclopedia article
Talk:Ian V. Hogg

message: I just realized that if he had time to serve in two theatres during WWII, then one would think that he must have been in the military prior to April 1945. Something needs clarification. I suspect that (a) he was in the military prior to April 1945, but did not join the Royal Artillery until then; or (b) the April 1945 date is incorrect; or (c) his service in Asia was not during WWII, but after it. Oh well, if I unearth the details, I'll incorporate them. Lumbercutter 15:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Enlistment date vis-à-vis WWII service in two theatres

message: That sounds likely, but it is also possible that Hogg served in a civillian capacity (i.e. ambulance driver/ merchant navy/ H.M. Coast Guard), etc or simply was intially sent to Europe and after V.E. day, was moved either to the cleanup action agaisnt Japan or to the British component of the occupation of some part of the Japanese Empire. V. Joe 15:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 1 (2006)

message: England is in Europe. Enlisting automatically means he "served in Europe." The war in Asia didn't end until September. So it is quite possible to enlist in April, do a couple of months of training in England, go to Asia, serve there, and have served in, as the article says "Europe and in eastern Asia." Note the article says nothing about serving in two "theatres". Words mean things. The article says "served in Europe and in eastern Asia." You're the one who added "theatre". The article says nothing of the kind.
139.48.25.61 (talk) 15:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 2 (2008)

message: Is there any chance we could get a picture of Ian V Hogg here? Marlon 02:05, 20 November 2006
:There are photos available, but they are all copyrighted. Any copyright-holders out there willing to license a photo as public domain or GFDL? — ¾-10 17:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone willing to license a photo? 

message: May it help to have a list of all the books he wrote. I only know if 1 called The Nuclear War File by Ian V. Hogg and Christoper Chant, with intro done b Professor Laurence Martin, 1981 Reith Lecturer. 220.239.38.139 (talk) 01:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a dump from LOC.gov, globally converted to wikitable syntax. Because I'm procrastinating getting back to real work. Caveat 1: This needs cleanup; the "Coauthor(s)" column doesn't do justice to the illustrators and coeditors that are often listed within the title field. Caveat 2: U.S. LOC gives 96 records under "Hogg, Ian V., 1926-", but there could be dozens of other books by Hogg out there in the oceans that are not snagged by this net. I can think of one off the top of me head that isn't below. Cheers, — ¾-10 01:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of written books?
Talk:Eugène Atget

message: I created a link to Atget's work that is on display online at JGS (a not-for-profit collection).  Not only do I think this is relevant, but as a scholar hoping to view some of the work, I would be grateful for the link. Why the revert?? --Eastsidetruman (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to Major Collection Reverted?

message: Inebriated historians of photography occasionally conflate their affection for Atget's Au Tambour of 1908 (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Au_tambour.jpg) - arguably one of the better photographs ever made - with baseball fans' affection for long-ball hitter Ted Williams's final home run in his last game at Fenway Park in 1960. In both cases, the sensation is expressed colloquially as "Did you see that? Holy Cow, that's unbelievable!"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.94.233 (talk) 20:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  art historians' affection for Atget's photographs 

message: Reference to Atget as a Flaneur is footnoted, but the note does not tell us that HE was a flaneur. Is there a specific page reference? What is the value of calling him one in this context?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.59.211 (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flaneur 
Talk:Brassaï

message: Since this Hungariant painter is mentioned several times here, and has his own page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lajos_Tihanyi ,
it would be nice to add a link to it here.    71.186.135.99 (talk) 03:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -Lopifalko (talk) 07:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Lajos_Tihanyi

message: Discussion regarding this appears to be centered at Talk:List of Hungarian Jews#Brassai, just in case anybody else wanders into this. Luna Santin 19:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hungarian Jew? 
Talk:Stenungsund excavations

message: The current title, Roman Graves of Stenungsund, is factually misleading. There is no claim these are Roman graves. They are graves belonging to whatever culture was local to Sweden at the time, they only contain a few Roman objects. There were no Romans there, the only claim is they had a bit more contact with Romans than previously thought.
As long as we haven't got more to go on than that one newspaper report, I suggest merging with Stenungsund, where the information will be much more easy to find. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the moment, I've moved the page to Stenungsund excavations, to get the most severe error corrected. I'll propose the resulting redirect from the earlier title for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to merge the articles. One article should focus on the excavations themselves (a work in progress) and the other article should only focus on the history, population, etc. of the municipality itself. One article deals with archaeology and the other deals with geography. They should remain separate. Deucalionite 17:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Robert Grant (Christian leader)

message: Several of the claims in this article need to be made NPOV. For instance, "Concerned that Christians overwhelmingly voted in favor of President Jimmy Carter in 1976, Grant founded Christian Voice to mobilize Christian voters in favor of candidates who share their values." Carter was a Christian and ran on Christian values. Not all Christians share Grant's values and views, some would view what he preaches as extreme and distorted.
:Please stop turning this page into a promotional ad for Grant. It is POV and not historically accurate.--Cberlet 03:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The unsourced POV sentence was removed here, 16 December 2006. Ruodyssey (talk) 06:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the resume tag and a stub tag, and propose removing the NPOV dispute tag--not because it's not true, but because the resume tag also includes a call to make the article neutral. Janus303 (talk) 15:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and seeing no opposition in years, I've removed it and replaced it with . Ruodyssey (talk) 06:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: Does anyone think this article needs to be moved to something like Robert Grant (political leader)? WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 19:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly disagree. He seems to be more notable for being a religious leader than a political one. In fact, he doesn't seem to be a political leader at all -- more like a religious pundit for political talk shows. Ruodyssey (talk) 06:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Hybrid fiber-coaxial

message: :1. Diagram showing a typical HFC architecture
:2. A typical frequency chart showing where services are located in the frequency band. For example, in North America, typically 50-550MHz is 79 Analog Channels and 550MHz+ is for digital TV, internet data, telephony and VOD. Maybe this better belongs in the article for Cable television
:3. Examples and photos of actual optical nodes.
Unforgettable fan 16:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 4. A chart identifying the bandwidth capacity of the different technologies with a comparison of FTTX to HFC in mbps or gbps.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.219.96.73 (talk) 03:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wishlist for this article

message: Fiber. Fresheneesz (talk) 02:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fibre. :) 203.206.93.6 (talk) 13:07, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is the article spelled Fibre? Alphachimera (talk) 21:54, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

text: See: Optic fiber. What's going on here?!? Alphachimera (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Should standardise the spellings - change fiber to fibre to match the title, or move the entire page to 'Hybrid fiber-coaxial'? 124.169.195.78 (talk) 10:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fibre?
Talk:Barbacoa

message: This article needs attention to make it more cohesive. The sections seem to be unrelated, and there are currently no citations at all. The "Adaptations" section is particularly confusing--there appear to be either quotations or personal research within.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duckyphysics (talk • contribs) 23:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I think the references to restaurants in this sections should be deleted if they not provide useful information. It's not a place for advertisements.Itzcuauhlti (talk) 06:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I once had this at a Golden Corral breakfast buffet.  There was no label to say what it was.  My sister laughed at me as I put it on my plate, and my brother-in-law walked by and said, "Cheek meat."  I don't see any reference in the article that this was the part of the body it came from.  (And no, he did not mean the cheek of the cow's face!) --204.246.229.130 (talk) 22:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous venues for barbacoa, not for advertisement 

message: As it is currently written in Spanish, this section is of little help.  Can someone perhaps do a translation?  65.167.146.130 (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology 

message: In my romanian language, the expression "berbec copt" means "roasted ram". berbec(check the latin "vervex")=ram, copt=roasted, now you know why for the mexicans the "barbacoa" is in connection with sheep meat in the first place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigshotnews (talk • contribs) 02:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etimology from...romanian language? 

message: THEY DIG 4 foot hole in the ground add hot large rocks in hole. Then rap up seasoned garlic lots of steak seasoning chili spices jalapeño pepper cow head and tongue and wrap with wet linen and wet burlap tie with cooking string. Cover the hole and meat after place a lot of coal and rock around head of cow cook covered all night with aluminum roofing usually 3 sheets place firewood and rocks around top burn feed fire into morning. 6pm to 6am. Shred meat off bone on pan collect juices. Barbecoa shredded spicy meat. Cheek of “COW.” They did not waste used it all.  Clean and dried hide for many decades. 76.150.12.101 (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  BARBACOA 

message: 'grandfathered in" seems to imply there is some law against the traditional method.  If that's the case needs further explanation. 2600:1702:3B50:4680:B1CB:2157:4384:EBBF (talk) 23:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  grandfathered in?
Talk:MMC

message: "Multimedia Command" or "Multimedia Command Set" was first introduced to this page on 21:13, January 1, 2005. That's nearly two years ago, yet there's still no sign of an article. If you're informed on the subject then please, knock out a quick stub so that it can be linked to. Until then I'm going to remove it as per the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages): "Links to non-existent articles ("redlinks") may be included only when an editor is confident that an encyclopedia article could be written on the subject.. Adding links to articles not yet written should be done with care. There is no need to brainstorm all occurrences of the page title and create redlinks to articles that are unlikely ever to be written". --DeLarge 16:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Multimedia Command

message: From the FAQ at blu-ray.com 
:Will Blu-ray support mandatory managed copy?
:Yes, mandatory managed copy (MMC) will be part of the Blu-ray format. This feature will enable consumers to make legal copies of their Blu-ray movies that can be transferred over a home network. Please note that "mandatory" refers to the movies having to offer this capability, while it will be up to each hardware manufacturer to decide if they want to support this feature.
Re HD-DVD, nothing useful on this at DVD Forum site (!) but e.g. HP gave MMC as a reason why they backed HD-DVD.
:...two customer-friendly technologies, Mandatory Managed Copy and iHD, which are already included in the HD-DVD format...Mandatory Managed Copy...permits consumers to make legal copies of video content
Michael Gold 18:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandatory Managed Copy
Talk:Gelatin silver process

message: I'd like to suggest merging the article Gelatin silver print into this article.  It appears to be based on the same source and to be describing the same photographic process.  It appears to me that the name of this article is more consistent with the terminology used in the other articles on photographic processes. EastTN (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but in discussion of one you inevitably are led to the other. There is no need to distinguish between articles on the process to make a photograph and a page describing the photograph itself. One says "This is how you make a thing" and the other "This is how a thing is made." All that leads to is clutter.Captain Biggles (talk) 13:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal 

message: See http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/DSphotodry5E6.htm for the photograph "A pack of Bennett's Instantaneous Gelatine Photographic Plates".  The photo shows "made by C. Bennett."  The article discusses Bennett's contribution--he actually was the first to make gelatin silver plates; Maddox only wrote an article suggesting the idea.  At least in the USA, Bennett would get the patent and the invention credit, not Maddox, because Maddox did not reduce the idea to practice.  Thus I think Wikipedia should credit Bennett, not Maddox, with inventing the gelatin silver process.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.40.140.5 (talk) 23:28, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: It's Charles Bennett, not Charles Harper Bennet, and he's the real inventor

message: Does anyone know whether there was actually something new about Maddox's 1871 process? I've read that this would have been the first commercially viable dry plate method, but have not yet found any reliable sources that explained whether his formula contained any previously untested chemical or manipulation, nor that his article drew special attention or inspired commercial manufacturers.Joortje1 (talk) 11:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maddox?
Talk:World's Greatest Tag Team

message: If anyone knows how to describe it, shouldn't that leapfrog move they used be listed?I think it was their main move. Freebird (talk) 12:47, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag Team moves 