lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Luzzu

message: Can you help by seeking the best position of the image Maltesedog 14:18, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repositioning of images 

message: Is it really necessary to have a plenty of templates in every article? I guess it is better to link to an article, where all those boats are described. If you overload every article with templates on this and that so somewehere it will get unreadable. Blowup (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's difficult to find a balance. But the Luzzu is an important example of a traditional fishing boat - even though the details of that have not yet been fleshed out in the article. The navigation panel makes it easy to cruise round other traditional boats, and past experience shows the hit rate for articles like this trebles when the navigation panel is added. Otherwise the article remains relatively orphaned. --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  new template - why
Talk:Paul Lo Duca

message: * I removed the names of the two minor leaguers Lo Duca was traded to the Mets for and someone put them back in.  Personally, I think the names of two single-A level minor leaguers is more detail than most will want.  I follow the Mets to a limited degree and I've never even heard of these two.  I vote we wait to see if they even make it to the majors.  wknight94 14:18, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Prospects in Mets trade
Talk:Trygve Haavelmo

message: Although sources disagree, citing variously 26, 27 and 28 July 1999, most of those in Norwegian seem to give Haavelmo's date of death as 28.07.1999, and as this is the date cited in his obituary in Aftenposten, I have changed the article accordingly. -- Picapica 14:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://homepage.newschool.edu/~het/profiles/haavelmo.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Thank you for the link to the Prize Lecture.--Rougieux (talk) 09:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Nobel Prize Lecture 
Talk:Pagan metal

message: I removed  as there is no discussion of that merge on Talk:Black metal. Hyacinth 08:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  i put it back as the corresponfing mergtag was still on Black metal. if you remove them, remove them both please. Zzzzz 11:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I don′t know where you come from, but it is common in Europe. --Sängerkrieg auf Wartburg, formerly active using the static IP adress 132.187.3.26. 12:27, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I find it quite funny to be honest that WolfChant arnt on the list of paganmetal bands. Listn to: A Paganstorm, Rewvenge, World In Ice, Wolfchant From the Mountainside etc.
They even describe themselves as "Epic Pagan Metal from Bavaria"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.70.218 (talk) 16:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WolfChant 

message: It′s needed an infobox here. --XXN (talk) 23:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Birds Australia

message: It seems that there is a lack of interest in these two arts.  The RAOU and the Birds Aust - as two separate era, - if someone is prepared to put the effort into giving a good sense of the pioneering work that the old generation of the RAOU did in Australia - otherwise merge if no-one is going to do the history thing. User:SatuSuro 12:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it seems it needs someone to put something in about the RAOU old days,as the article seems relatively flat at the moment User:SatuSuro 12:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do so User:SatuSuro 09:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Issue
Talk:Dean Goldfine

message: Please feel free to add more information about Dean Goldfine. There is a dearth of information available about him on the Internet and this article is a result of what I could find. Noelle De Guzman 14:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome
Talk:Thérèse of Lisieux

message: Back in 2008, the page was moved from Therese de Lisieux to Thérèse of Lisieux.
That would be fine, except throughout the text we call her Therese, not Thérèse.
Since the version without diacritics is what we know her as in the anglosphere, I suggest we change the page to Therese of Lisieux. 
Comments? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 09:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd highly appreciate that. If I remember correctly, I changed all those "Thérèse"s into "Therese" once ago, but it was set back.--Medusahead (talk) 10:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name
Talk:Alpha Cassiopeiae

message: Why was Schedar named Schedar? Is there some special meaning to it?
:From Professor Jim Kaler's site: The name "Shedar" comes directly from the Arabic word for "breast," and describes the position of the star in the heart of the ancient Queen. The Queen being Cassiopeia. — RJH 21:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional name 

message: I've done the best I can to report on the visual magnitude of Alpha Cas versus Beta Cas.  Not being an astronomer myself, I don't know how to explain the conflicting data from the various photometric studies reported in SIMBAD versus the more recent van Leeuwen study of 2007.   If anyone can clarify this point, it would be greatly appreciated.--Sadalsuud (talk) 14:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't checked, but at first glance I imagine the difference is because Hipparcos measured in the HP (Hipparcos passband) and VT (Tycho V) bands, which are almost but not quite the same as Johnson V. See Bessel 2000 for a discussion (esp figures 2 and 5). I'll have a more detailed look in the literature at some point in the next few days. Incidentally, why is it so important which exactly is brighter in V? Modest Genius talk 16:45, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest adopting V=2.240+-0.002 from ASCC for Alpha Cas. The same catalogue gives V=2.269+-0.003 for Beta Cas. Modest Genius talk 18:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I hadn't realised that the Bessel article was behind a paywall (ADS has it incorrectly marked in green, which is supposed to mean publicly available. It worked fine from my university computer, presumably due to my IP.). There's a freely available copy at . Modest Genius talk 17:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting magnitudes 
Talk:Hethrir

message: "it could not accomplish these feats for free; instead, it drew upon the life energy of sacrificed victims. "
Some of the victims, such as the Ithorian child, were not sacrificed, but were given to Waru under the belief that it would try to heal them. --PrometheusX303 15:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Still strikes me as a sacrifice- the givers knew full right well that Waru sometimes "failed". --Maru  (talk) Contribs 18:08, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  True, but they were not given to Waru in order to give him their life force, therefore they were not given as a sacrifice.  His "failures" were not truely failures because he did not try to heal them.  PrometheusX303 20:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victims of Waru 

message: I have restored the long-standing redirect. This is an utterly non-notable character, and the "article" offers no real-world treatment rooted in significant real-world third-party coverage. --EEMIV (talk) 03:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Caș

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Question: Based on what sources?  I would certainly support the proposal if this is true, but anyone could post a request like this and be wrong.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The answer is in the two articles linked in my request: s-comma vs s-cedilla. AjaxSmack has given an extended answer with more examples. S-cedilla is an incorrect sign. When the Turks have done their language reform under Ataturk, they have used the S-comma for the same sound, but decided to go for the cedilla as it would facilitate the production of metal movable type. Now the Turkic languages do go for S-cedilla. Romania never changed the system, but that lead to an unfortunate mix when DTP got into use. Sometimes you have the strange combination of t-comma ț and s-cedilla in the same publication. Ableci (talk) 09:13, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Private equity fund

message: There are a lot of terms here I don't understand.
What is a "business unit", what are "the targets", what is "delisted", "already unlisted", "IPO" and "held private"?
Is the fund (singular) restructuring the companies (plural) or itself? "to restructure its (singular) capital .." implies the fund is restructuring itself.  
I was searching Wikipedia for a definition of "unlisted companies" and this was one of the articles that came up - but it didn't help.
I know from my own field (computer support) how easy it is to fall into using jargon and technical terms.  That's what this writer seems to have done.  Thanks for your contribution - I realise this article is a stub but I hope my questions help you see how to make the article clearer to unfinancial laymen like myself. 
I reckon that is the strength of Wikies.
 GraL 13:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A private equity fund is a specific type of investment vehicle with a number of topics on structure, economic, etc. that are specific and unrelated to an article on Private Equity which is an asset class and an investment strategy.  Also, a private equity fund as intended in this article is separate and distinct from a private equity firm or a financial sponsor.  This page should remain distinct and independent of the others. Urbanrenewal (talk) 14:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate and Distinct Topic 

message: Could someone plse. check whether this link should go to de:Publikumsfond THKS71.236.26.74 (talk) 07:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It should have pointed to de:Private-Equity-Unternehmen, had there been such a page. ehn (talk) 21:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: German link

message: Shouldn't this be spelled private-equity fund (with a hyphen)? It's a fund that invests in private equity, not (necessarily) an equity fund that's private. ehn (talk) 21:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:United States Civil Service Commission

message: Major magazines such as Time, Life, American Heritage
OPM website
It's a start... --StaniStani 04:59, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ideas for Sources

message: According this document, in April 1949 chairman of the commission was Guy Moffett. GeorgHH (talk) 21:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chairmen of the commission
Talk:Veronica (plant)

message: Temp subpage done - MPF 15:39, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Synthyris and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 22#Synthyris until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 20:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Synthyris" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Andy Roddick Foundation

message: Please feel free to expand the Andy Roddick Foundation article. Noelle De Guzman 15:41, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome

message: From the first sentence, what are "cancer disease children"? I did a Google search for the phrase and found just 13 articles, all in reference to the Andy Roddick Foundation. Should this be "children with cancer"? I realize that this is a direct quotation from the official website, but it doesn't make sense, so it should be changed.
Muéro 17:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that's the way the AR Foundation describes itself, but feel free to come up with a less stilted way of describing the foundation. Be Bold! --Noelle De Guzman (talk) 10:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancer Disease Children
Talk:List of places in Georgia (U.S. state) (A–D)

message: Is there any way of making this and the other Georgia place lists smaller? It's about 100kilobytes larger than the recommended maximum. 23skidoo 15:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I split it up into an A-D list and and E-H list. Georgia guy 18:30, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Way too big
Talk:Index of philosophy articles (D–H)

message: Why was "examples" thought to be a philosophical topic? It's just a redirect page, so I've unlinked it. Should it be removed altogether? -- Mikeblas 01:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  examples? 

message: There's a discussion on what the reference requirements for lists like this one.  The Transhumanist (talk) 01:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Should there be an exception for indexes?]] 

message: These subjects redirect to the 'Dogma' page, which has very little to do with epistemological dogmatism as formulated by James Pryor (see "The Skeptic and the Dogmatist," Noûs, 2000, vol. 34, pp. 517-549).  They should be unlinked until there is a page dealing properly with this subject.  Khyleth (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dogmatism and dogmatists
Talk:Index of philosophy articles (I–Q)

message: Magnitude is a disambiguation page; hence, I removed it from the list. If you believe it should be in the list, please discuss it here. D4g0thur 15:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnitude 

message: There's a discussion on what the reference requirements for lists like this one.  The Transhumanist (talk) 01:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Should there be an exception for indexes?]] 

message: Is is a disambig. Shouldn't be here.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil  11:10, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is
Talk:Index of philosophy articles (R–Z)

message: I am working on disambiguating the term "saturation" and am wondering what to do with the terms "saturated" and "unsaturated" on this page. The best I can come up with related to philosophy is the mathematical logic concept of the saturated model. I think the solution here is to create a red link for "Saturation (philosophy)" if a different meaning is sought. DA3N 17:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguating "saturation" 

message: What is a sample, as it relates to philosophy? Right now, this list links to "sample", which is a disambiguation page that doesn't offer a definition for philosophy. Can the link be removed? -- Mikeblas 03:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguating "sample" 

message: Similar to the above questions.. what does "tone" mean in a philosophical topic context?  I don't see a term on the disambiguation page that seems even remotely appropriate.  Can the link be removed?  -- Upholder 22:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguating "tone" 

message: There's a discussion on what the reference requirements for lists like this one.  The Transhumanist (talk) 01:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Should there be an exception for indexes?]] 

message: I have requested an expert to look at this article. It contains several links to disambiguation pages that should be solved. An expert should know far quicker where to link to (or when to add additional links) then I do. Your effort will be much appreciated. Night of the Big Wind talk 20:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert needed

message: This page links to Substratum, which presently redirects to Stratum (linguistics) but may in future lead to a disambiguation page. None of the relevant dabs seem to have a link to a philosophy article so I'm not sure how to fix this. Thryduulf (talk) 10:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substratum 

message: This outline needs to be organised. Rather than just a hodgepodge of hyperlinks, it should be linearly organised, like an actual outline would generally be. Linearly organised vertically and alphabetically ordered. Seriously, what I need to find just took me 3x as longer than if it were actually in a rational format. -SarahTehCat (talk) 03:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organised Outline
Talk:UK oil pipeline network

message: Nice work Paddy. Thanks for contributing this. Pcb21 Pete 16:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I changed the link to point to Coryton Refinery (which, however, doesn't exist yet). --David Edgar 17:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

message: These are geographically very close areas and are both industrial. Is it possible that Avonmouth -> Fawley is the same as Fawley -> Severnside? 194.66.93.27 (talk) 10:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Avonmouth and Severnside

message: Why is the page named "UK oil pipeline network"? It's about UKOP. So wouldn't it be better to move it to United Kingdom Oil Pipeline or UK Oil Pipeline? A google check indicates that the phrase "UK oil pipeline network" is not commonly used except in this article and its derivatives. --David Edgar 16:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: Can anyone explain what the map on the right hand side is supposed to show. Does the UK oil pipeline network not include the CLH system, or is this entry just rather out of date. As I understand Buncefield is just petroleum storage (no refinery) so the CLH network must be there. If the map is accurate and just that lines are very thin, would it be possible to widen (and name) them? With current (October 2021) fuel distribution problems this entry is likely to become popular (the reason why I'm here!)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.152.201.79 (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Luke Vibert

message: New Album:
"We Hear You"
http://www.planet-mu.com/discography/ZIQ240
Release August 10th
Critical heralded as a return to form. Devout Catalyst (talk) 10:59, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Album 

message: Greetings all, am dealing with a potentially problematic user regarding in which genres Luke's music would be classified as, so I am seeking consensus before taking further action.  Is Luke's work considered significantly Acid jazz in nature, ala Groove Collective, Brand New Heavies, Digable Planets and Stereo MCs?  My exposure to his work aligns it more with Acid house, and no tie-in to jazz period is mentioned at all in the article. Thanks all for your time. Srobak (talk) 06:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre consensus 
Talk:Elihu Club

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Elihu (secret society) →  – The correct name of the group is Elihu Club. Using its full name will help avoid confusion with other entries called Elihu in Wikipedia. In addition, it is a senior society, not a a secret society. It was specifically was formed to counter the secret societies at Yale. New sources that I have added confirm both this and its correct name. Rublamb (talk) 23:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 July 2023
Talk:Stéphane Breitwieser

message: The article seems to need some confusion cleared up in regards to how the thiefs name is officially spelt.
Namely; in the title of the article it says Breitw>ie<ser, whereas in the very first words of the article it says Breitw>ei<ser.
Which one is correct? Or at the very least, which one should be chosen for consistency throughout the article?
Asked by 82.100.127.185 (talk) 21:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of his name

message: This not a credible estimation. 300 items at 5 million each  would amount to 1.5bn.
The most valuable stolen piece seems to be the only one in the millions range. The Guardian piece says that 110 items thrown in the river were worth 6 millions. The BBC reports visibly an earlier guess ("The French police are quoting a value of 1.5bn euros, and when you are dealing with 60 to 70 museum-quality pieces that would be about right.") which seems wrong by a factor of 10 or 100.  80.72.94.110 (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 1.5 bn?

message: I hadn't ever heard the mother-destroying-stolen-art aspect. Can someone please expand on this? 69.254.196.144 16:16, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother 

message: the art_theft page specifies 238 pieces of art were stolen and this page specifies 239, neither with a verifiable source.
Desolite (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantity Stolen 

message: Apparently this page needs a major update!
See - http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/37537/police-nab-europes-most-notorious-art-thief-and-his-mom-too/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.49.184.245 (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrested again? 
Talk:Friedrich von Bernhardi

message: I have a date of death of December 11, 1930, but no source.
Rbraunwa 16:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He is supposed to have said to the Americans that he did not really like war. An English propagandist is scathing:
MISUNDERSTOOD
Bernhardi "Indeed I am the most humane fellow in the world"
It need not necessarily be supposed that the directors of German destiny, who are not devoid of intelligence, took the ravings of Bernhardi over-seriously. He had his special uses no doubt before the day. But on the morrow of the day, when questions of responsibility came to be raised, he became one of many inconvenient witnesses; and there has scarcely been a better joke among the grim humours of this catastrophe than the mission of this Redhot-Gospeller of the New Unchivalry of War to explain to "those idiotic Yankees" that he was really an ardent pacifist. The most just, the most brilliant, the most bitter pamphlet of invective could surely not say so much as this reeking cleaver, those bloody hands, that fatuous leer and gesture, this rigid victim. Bernhardism was not a mere windy theory. It was exactly practised on the Belgian people.
-JOSEPH THORP
Now, when was this supposed to have happened? If this can be properly sourced, it could be included in the article. 213.205.240.183 (talk) 14:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pacifist?

message: https://archive.org/details/greatbritainnext0000doyl
Hello there,
I've added Arthur Conan Doyle's published response to von Bernhardi's tome on the coming war.
Kind Regards,
M.H.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PfPorlock (talk • contribs) 06:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link added