Talk:Baltimore riot of 1861

message: This article has been returned to start class, primarily since it has not beenc chcecked against the requirments for B class. --NeoNerd 12:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start Class

message: No, that happened during the 100-gun salute at Fort Sumter
Randy Golden (talk) 13:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First Union casualty

message: My addition of this article to the Crime in Maryland category was reverted as "digressive", a term which the editor seems to like using lately. Since the activity accompanying the riot was a crime and occurred in Maryland, I believe it should be included under this category.  I'd be fine with using a more specific subcategory, such as "Riots in Maryland" or "Crime in Baltimore", though none currently exist. Comments? —ADavidB 13:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Msking a subcategory of Crime in Maryland which lists the various riots already lumped together in the main category (which by the way appears to be nonrepresentative of the material) would be one way to resolve the dispute. Tedickey (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Crime in Maryland

message: The article's opening indicates that the conflict involved "infantrymen of the United States Army." This is incorrect, as the unit in question (6th Massachusetts Volunteer Militia, Co. C,D,I and L) were not regular army, nor had they been yet mustered into Federal service. (That happened AFTER they reached Washington.) 
I would suggest that phrase be corrected to read "members of the Massachusetts militia".
Temporaryhero (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Statement

message: 'According to the report of Colonel Edward F. Jones, Sixth Massachusetts Militia, during their travel, James Brady was “taken insane” and left in Delanco Township, New Jersey, with J. C. Buck.'
This does not seem to relate to anything before or after it. Possible vandalism? Valetude (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That whole paragraph was added about a year ago, with the 1800 source. —ADavidB 16:22, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement in limbo 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Baltimore riot of 1861's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "articles.baltimoresun.com":
From Maryland in the American Civil War: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2001-11-27/features/0111270102_1_habeas-fort-mchenry-lincoln-suspension
From History of St. Mary's College of Maryland: Jo-Ann Pilardi, Baltimore Sun, "Margaret Brent: a Md. founding mother", March 05, 1998 http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1998-03-05/news/1998064114_1_margaret-brent-lord-baltimore-calvert
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:11, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Baltimore riot of 1861]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baltimore riot of 1861. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212011511/http://bcpl.info/info/history/hist_ra_history.html to http://www.bcpl.info/info/history/hist_ra_history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This claim seems a bit late, given Lincoln did call these troops to DC.
This seems like historical revisionism given the North won the war.SkrillixWasTooSoon (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...it was the Baltimore riot that pushed the two sides over the edge into full-scale war