lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Warlord (DC Thomson)

message: The article says that "much of the language used in the stories was modern, and terms given used to describe the enemy reflected commonly used descriptions." I'm not sure, but I think this is a roundabout way of saying that the Germans were referred to as krauts and the Japanese in particular as nips or Japs. I understand the reluctance of the article's writer to openly discuss this; perhaps it could be illustrated with a scan of one of the covers, e.g. this, from 26Pigs, which is so very wrong on so many levels that it resembles a parody. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 08:06, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I might be misreading it but it seems a mistake - "modern" should really be "period" as it reflects the terms used relevant to the time the story is set in. (Emperor (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure there really needs to be a section about the sort of language used in the comic anyway. Surely an encyclopaedic article should simply say when it started, when it ended and describe a few of the stories. Why are British adventure comics always unfairly treated in this fashion, with unessescary attention being drawn to any un-PC aspects? I remember some columnist once complaining that Air Ace Picture Library was "not historically accurate" because it didn't mention 5000 French civilians being killed in an air raid on Calis. Yet I doubt he applied the same standards to Inglorious Basterds, which depicts Hitler being assasinated in a 1944 theatre fire! 81.135.97.69 (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern language

message: I am pretty sure that the squadron was called Holocaust squadron, but I wont change it without evidence. 95.223.119.137 (talk) 20:42, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real name of Harrier Squadron 

message: "Spider Wells" and "Bomber Braddock" are listed in the infobox as "Main characters", and both are mentioned in the into, yet neither appear in the 'List of major characters.
Surely if they're "main" they should be listed in the "major" section? 155.190.60.34 (talk) 02:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main characters not considered major?
Talk:Georg Donatus, Hereditary Grand Duke of Hesse

message: Why is this not at George Donatus? Not that I'm complaining, I'd rather see it at Georg Donatus, but since the more common of his father's name, Ernest Ludwig, isn't being used, I'm a bit curious that there was no mad rush to change his name to the more "English" version. Morhange 20:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sarah Jane Mee

message: When is she leaving Heart? Someone editing anonymously added information suggesting she had left, but she still appears to be there according to their website. Can anyone advise? Cheers Paul20070 (talk) 12:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have now updated this - removing Heart profile, etc. Will add another external link (eg, imdb, SkyPressOffice) as soon as one becomes available. Paul20070 (talk) 22:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heart FM
Talk:25th Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: Needs a proper intro, citations, categories.  Desertsky85451 20:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just added the regiment's WWII history (all covered by its entries or that of the 93rd Infantry Division in Stanton's OOB book). What's definitely missing is it's WWI record (I expect the regiment was activated at the time) and post WWII history. Oddly enough Stanton did not seem to say at what date the regiment was activated for WWII.--Caranorn 23:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII

message: The reason Stanton did not list in his OOB book the 25th being activated for WWII is that it was already active and had been for years. 
Danny Johnson 23:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII

message: "Colored Troops
(segregated African-American unit)"
Currently the role section reads as above, surely this is not the place to have such information. I think it would be more beneficial to note the role of the unit not what it was comprised of, for example "infantry", "dragoons" etc whatever they actually fought as.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 23:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Role

message: According to some sources, the 25th was actively involved in battling the Great Fire of 1910.  Are there enough accounts of this to make a section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.179.71.200 (talk) 04:15, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-Combat Activity
Talk:Sarah Lancaster

message: The article has her "best known for" her role in four seperate shows. Shouldn't we just pick one? 81.104.80.126 21:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Known For 

message: This picture should be replaced by one of the many accurate and good quality photos available.  Moosemcghee (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine as long as we have the right to use the photo. The one you uploaded has an uncertain copyright status, so I am reverting until you can establish that Wikipedia has the right to use it. -Phoenixrod (talk) 03:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Sarah Ludford, Baroness Ludford

message: Request edit
Hi, I'm the subject of this entry. I'd be grateful if the phrase 'Her father, Joseph Ludford, sent her to the independent Portsmouth High School...' could be replaced by 'She won a scholarship to the [then] direct grant school Portsmouth High School...'
The existing formulation is both sexist (as if my mother had no role in it!) and inaccurate in that he did not 'send' me - which suggests paying fees - but I got a scholarship from Hants County Council on the basis on the (then) 11+ exam. The pupils were a mix of fee-paying and publicly-funded scholarship. 
All back in the mists of history (1962) but I hope you agree this makes it more accurate.
Thanks, 
Sarah Ludford 
ludfords@parliament.uk  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.237.48.175 (talk) 18:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Caerleon Urban District

message: I know Vision of Britain has Christchurch CP being part of Caerleon UD from 1894 but this  puts it in Magor RD. The census tables in VoB are inconsistent, giving the area of Caerleon Ud as identical to Caerleon CP, with Christchurch CP listed also. Did the residue of Christchurch CP pass to Caerleon UD in 1935?
Lozleader 20:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly. That archives link states that "Magor RDC was abolished in 1935 and was mostly absorbed by the new Magor and St Mellons RDC". Although there was a Newport [Monmouthshire] Extension Act (24 & 25 Geo. 5 c. lvii) in 1934 which may have accounted for the rest. Owain (talk) 09:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sarah Miles

message: Citing famous practitioners of urine therapy. such as Gandhi and Nero,
Former PM of  India Moraji Desai,did follow the therapy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.172.168 (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: One thing worth remarking upon is the number of places on the internet that have exactly the same sentence as appears here, together with the Nero mention.  I think somebody is merely copying text which wrongly included a Nero reference, and it's spread into the status of a world wide myth.
In the source already given for this (an interview with Miles) she clearly only cites Gandhi, so I've amended the article and noted the citation. --JH49S (talk) 02:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure about this line 

message: subject line says it all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.11.85.188 (talk) 22:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "remarried until his death" - no clue what this means 

message: If her mother was Clarice Vera Remnant, whose father Francis was he who was allegedly son of Prince Francis of Teck, why is Miles's father's name given as Frank Remnant? Surely it should be [X] Miles? One source indicates his name to be John Miles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.207.204 (talk) 19:28, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Father's name?

message: The article currently states: Miles stated, in 2007, that she had been drinking her own urine for 30 years for health reasons.
Miles revealed this long before 2007 during an interview on the Irish television chat show, The Late Late Show. I can no longer remember exactly when I saw this interview but it was during the 1970s or 1980s. — O'Dea (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urine drinking 

message: THIS ENTIRE PASSAGE IS TOO DETAILED AND SHOULD BE DELETED: "The film received positive reviews, described as funny, colourful and clever, capturing the early enthusiasm for aviation.[7][8][9] It was treated as a major production, one of only three full-length 70 mm Todd-AO Fox releases in 1965 with an intermission and musical interlude part of the original screenings.[10] Because of the Todd-AO process, the film was an exclusive roadshow feature initially shown in deluxe Cinerama venues, where customers needed reserved seats purchased ahead of time.[11] The film grossed $31,111,111 theatrically and on home video $29,950,000.[12][13] Audience reaction both in first release and even today, is nearly universal in assessing the film as one of the "classic" aviation films."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8070:A2B3:AC00:3090:CD33:97FF:81D1 (talk) 09:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I have deleted some of the detail. It could probably be edited down some more.  Ttwaring (talk) 16:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to delete lengthy plot description
Talk:Hollyoaks: In the City

message: The show "is" (as I told the person who changed it to "was"), creative works "are" unless, for example, they've (all) been destroyed (then they would be "were") 
Addendum: I welcome you to get consensus if you wish to change to (the incorrect) past tense. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the, er, invitation. I already provided a significant amount of evidence on your talk page that the past tense is correct, which you did not refute, and I invite you and any other interested parties to review that. Cheers, DWaterson 18:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, you however provided nothing that would be valid encyclopaedic-ally, unless your denying the creative work *exists* then it is certainly correct to use present tense. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 18:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yet you have provided no evidence to support your assertion. Even WikiProject TV use the past tense, as I demonstrated, indicating considerable consensus from a large number of project members. DWaterson 18:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense
Talk:Sarah Patterson

message: The April 1972 birth date is as per imdb, where it has been discussed and generally dismissed. If it is correct, she was probably eleven when she ran around the set of The Company of Wolves in her birthday suit, and she was improbably well developed for her age. It is more likely she was born circa 1969, and was about 14 when she appeared in The Company of Wolves and about 17 in Snow White, but that is just a guess. Choalbaton (talk) 15:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually Danielle Dax who runs around in her birthday suit, not Sarah Patterson. But I take your point that 1972 would probably make her too young in that movie. It seems off by a year or two.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 02:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1972 year of birth is highly unlikely
Talk:The Suite Life of Zack & Cody: Tipton Trouble

message: FIRST OFF, I deleted the previous part of this discussion because it has nothing to do with the article. Second, and I don't mean to sound derogatory, but, WHO THE HECK WROTE THE ARTICLE!?!?  The whole thing is just a critique and the opinion (hence the phrase "I THINK" 20 million times in the article).  THE ARTICLE NEEDS A TOTAL REWRITE.  Plus, whoever DID write the article put the infobox in the wrong place, and, though I don't approve of the article itself, refused to organize it into sections.  This article definitely requires such a cleanup that it will take every custodian in the world just to fix it (metaphor just used) !  And I don't have the game, so I cannot rewrite this.  If possible, can be get an expert with video game articles here?  Noone 23:38 EST, 20 October 2006
:: Ok, this is ridiculous.  I can't fix the article because I know nothing about the game, but still! I said "section it off", but this article is still a critique.  WE NEED IT TO BE AN ARTICLE. NOT AN OPINION. SOMEONE FIX THE ARTICLE!!!!  Noone 22:22 EST, 29 October 2006
::: That would be because it was flagrantly plagiarized from here. I deleted the illegal content. Beaumains 00:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for fixing the articlE!!! (Now all we need to do is make it no longer a stub!) - A very happy Noone 19:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Sarah Purcell

message: Funny how that happened 24 years ago and I still remember it.  Gary Collins' page makes no mention of it. (I guess it's not important.)  It's a reminder of the AIDS hysteria going on at the time.
64.183.42.36 (talk) 22:47, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It is trivial, so I’m removing it.Nicmart (talk) 03:49, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needle mishap 

message: I just removed a statement added by an anon in 2015 accompanied by the footnote, "recent reruns on tv". That is not a valid citation. A statement that vague is the equivalent of "It's true because I said so." A valid cite must include the date and network that the show originally aired and the episode titles or numbers, as stated by a reliable source. The anon also improperly formatted the show title and I believe he got the year wrong. Try again when you can supply a verifiable citation with accurate information. Canonblack (talk) 12:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed invalid cite 

message: I don't think I've seen so many nicknames in a person's list of relatives before. It's rather amusing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by YingYang2 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nick names
Talk:Sarah Schulman

message: The claims regarding Schulman's early theatre work are not adequately documented. Footnote 9 refers the reader to a biographical sketch found on the website of the AIDS Oral History Project, an organization co-founded by Schulman. Since the biographical sketch for this website was presumably written by Schulman herself, it does not provide independent verification of the claims regarding her early involvement in theatre. In particular, there is no verification of when she began to work in theatre. Did she actually begin her downtown theatre collaborations in 1979, as the Wikipedia article now states, and if so, what plays/performances did she work on in 1979 and thereafter? Srelyea 21:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequate verification for early theatre work 

message: SS is a controversial person and the article needs to report on criticisms that have been made of her activism.
She is said to be a professor at City University, an academic position.  Does she have academic credentials ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.243.139.42 (talk) 06:44, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV problem 

message: As an example of a writer with a slew of fellowships, prizes, a long list of books, plays, but not a single work notable enough to inspire a fan to write a blue-linked article.  It's actually a remarkable artifact.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting bio
Talk:Sarah Sze

message: A portion of this text is lifted directly from Sarah Sze's gallery. Recommend striking or paraphrasing, as appropriate. Also, amend the promotional tone for encyclopedic context. Aolivex (talk) 22:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation  

message: — Assignment last updated by Kbrion (talk) 17:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Art since 1945

message: Hello everyone,
I am Amari Gutierrez and a student at New College who is currently working on this article. I am excited to contribute more information to this page and learn more about Sarah Sze work. I am primarily focusing on the extending the process section, adding to the lead paragraph and adding a section about the significance and the themes behind her work.
If you have any questions or concerns about anything, let me know.
Best,
Am,gut (talk) 18:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Attributions
Talk:Sarah Thomas (actress)

message: Sarah Thomas was in the same year as me at school, so she was definitely born in 1946 and not 1952. (ShawnLFlynn (talk) 14:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: According to available birth records, the only Sarah J Thomas born in 1946 was born in Wales, which has never been in London.  The birth of this Sarah J Thomas was registered in Lambeth in the final quarter of 1952.  Lambeth was, and still is, in London.  You had better come up with a good verifiable source if you want the date here to be changed.2602:304:AE26:9FD9:90F8:E9AB:C5FA:C08 (talk) 11:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  She was born in 1946
Talk:Sarah Watt

message: I inserted the words: "Her cancer has returned and is probably terminal." but these words have been removed. Why, considering that this is true? (see "The Age", "Life and Style", 22-10-'11)110.32.77.140 (talk) 08:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sarah Watt has died.  There was a death notice in today’s The Age (Saturday 5 November), for "Sarah Ann Watt (30.08.58 – 04.11.2011)", signed by "William, Clem and Stella".
This says she was born 1958.  It is clearly the same person.  There's nothing online as yet. --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 21:53, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, you can still cite it and add the info to the page.P0PP4B34R732 (talk) 22:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Died
Talk:Sarandeep Singh

message: I was looking for the dead person who died in 2014. You know, the Sarandeep mentioned when you open Photoshop Elements 13? That guy? He should have one too. 2602:306:CE62:8430:8CF3:1E54:F8EE:BFA0 (talk) 12:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not who I expected

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Sardar Bahadur Khan

message: I did wonder about this myself, saying that something is in his memory implies that he is no longer alive, but can we be sure? PatGallacher (talk) 21:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Browsing the school website, it seems all but directly stated... but then again, I went into it biased. Cheers, CP 21:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sarfraz Nawaz

message: There have been some edits here changing Sarfraz to Sarfaraz and vice versa. It does appear that Sarfraz is far more common. In google "Sarfraz Nawaz" cricket gets 21K hits while Sarfaraz gets 1290. In the Pakistani media, Dawn has 6 Sarfaraz and 75 Sarfraz while Jang has 14 Sarfaraz and 128 Sarfraz. I don't see why we should use Sarfaraz in this article, except provide a redirect from a page of that name. Tintin (talk) 08:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly agree. I as a Pakistani, personally know that Sarfraz is extremely common. In Pakistan, minor variations in English transliterations of Urdu names are often ignored. Most prominent cricket web sites use Sarfraz instead of Sarfaraz. Szhaider 18:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarfaraz v Sarfraz 

message: The start of the article says Javed Miandad appealed, and the end says Sarfraz appealed.  It's gotta be one or the other, but I can't remember which.
Oh, and there was also the Hogg-runout-while-"gardening" incident in the same test (igniting a debate on when the ball should be regarded as "dead").  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.35.135.133 (talk) 03:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handled the ball 

message: I saw the ugly match live. First of all Miandad was not the captain.  Second, he did not second the ugly appeal of Sarfaraz.  I understand the Indians absolutely hate him and would lie anything to demonise him.  Second the Imran Khan lobby hates him and would not mind doing so itself.
Miandad did run out Hogg though, not out of malice, but out of childish mischievousness of a young boy. No-ball does not mean a ball is dead, and batsmen could be run out. To be dead, a fielder needs to collect it clean. Captain Mushtaq did call Hogg back but like all fast bowlers, Hogg showed temper by knocking the wickets off by his bat. Hurst later ran out Sikander Bakht to settle the score out of anger. Deplorable, but out of the anger of a fast bowler.
What Sarfaraz did was ugliest of the three incidents. However he was also a fast bowler like Hurst and Hogg, and showed his temper.
If anyone was responsible for these incidents, it were the captains of Pakistan and Australia. Kids would be kids and fast bowlers would be fast bowlers.  It is the job of the captain to control.
It is a shame anti-Miandad lobby would blatantly lie on Wikipedia. Hassanfarooqi (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect facts about handled the ball
Talk:Sarina Paris

message: I would like to know if anyone has a link to another source for this person, and more to the point, a source that addresses that bizzare quality of her voice, because I'm going to need to see something like that before I'm going to believe it, especially after listening to "Look At Us." ~Kazu 19:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: I have her cd, all of the music sounds like it is autotuned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.49.82 (talk) 00:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source here
Talk:Fuck You and Then Some

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:!!!Fuck You!!! - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 15:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: May have accidentally moved it... I changed it immediately. --- preceding unsigned comment by Mr. Great Cow  —Preceding undated comment added 06:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoops! 

message: No mention that it's actually a cover of a Subhumans (Canada) song 2600:1700:7840:A10:81BB:C3F5:BBB9:B9A (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuck You Is Cover
Talk:Sasa Ognenovski

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved with consensus to follow Ortizesp's comment – Saša Ognenovski (soccer player) → Sasa Ognenovski, Rodrigo (beach soccer player) → Rodrigo (beach soccer), Antonio Robles (soccer player) → Antonio Robles (eliminating the disambiguation page), and Jeff Moore (soccer player) → Jeff Moore (soccer). (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 04:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 November 2022