Talk:Fly Me to the Moon

message: I'm in doubt about the time signature of this piece. Is that 3/4 or 4/4? It seems that nobody knows...  -- Morpheu5
The sheet music is 3/4, but everyone seems to swing it. Kisch 17:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time signature 

message: It seems that the singer CLAIR is a british indie songer/songwriter Claire Nicolson. The only source I sould find for this is this blurb about her on last.fm (which unfortunetly is a wiki itself). I sent an email message to Clair and will keep you updated. I hope this doesn't count as original research D: - Calicore 12:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is original research. That is allowed on talk pages, but you can't actually put it in the article. --GunnarRene 13:47, 19 October 2006  (UTC)
I'm pretty sure it's Claire Littley , she's posted on various evangelion YT videos to this effect, not sure how factual that makes it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.246.34 (talk) 16:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Neon Genesis Evangelion|EVA]] EP

message: How come the article doesn't follow the mandatory Wikipedia policy WP:V and how-to WP:CITE? You will have to do that eventually and it is easier if you do it as you go along.  Mattisse(talk) 12:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing sources 

message: A lot of people have sung this song, and it seems like everyone who comes along to this page wants to add someone to the list. Besides Sinatra, I don't really have any idea if any of these versions are more or less significant than the others, so I hesitate to remove any of them just through the justification of saying "they fall under 'and others'". That said, that paragraph is looking ridiculous as it stands, and I dare anyone to say it in its entirety without drawing a breath half-way through. So, I suppose, we need to find an alternative. My proposals:
#Discuss each artist mentioned there, and delete any that are not sufficiently significant (by some kind of standard - verifiability would help, but is probably too lenient).
#Make it a list. Either in the article or as a new article. Unfortunately, I do see the risk of this being considered listcruft, unless there is something more to be added to the list besides just who has sung it.
After that, I'm out of ideas. Confusing Manifestation 13:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say drop it completely, except for the 2 most known alternative versions (Sinatra? ... ?). 129.125.101.92 23:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I'd say make the list, wikipedia is supposed to be a source of knowledge and the look of the page shouldnt be a limitation for that purpose. My vote goes for option 2 --190.144.162.92 15:38, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many artists 

message: The image :Image:Itmightaswellbeswing.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Itmightaswellbeswing.jpg

message: Please note : There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/coverversions with the purpose of trying to establish a standard rule for merge/separate different versions of the same song. Please make known your opinions on the matter.--Richhoncho (talk) 12:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit: I read the discussion mentioned above, and changed my mind... (and posted there as well): covers should stay on main song article.--David Be (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: What does it mean that the title was change officially? 95.49.220.232 (talk) 23:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  official change of title 

message: Another editor removed, that was reverted and I have removed again. The arguments for removal are they are unreferenced and therefore fail WP:NSONGS and WP:GNG. I would have no objection to the re-addition of some or all - subject to the criteria being met. Adding merely because there was a performance on a talent show, or an album track on a red-linked album isn't cutting the mustard. --Richhoncho (talk) 07:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:Five pillars, WP:NSONGS and WP:GNG and then we can have a discussion. Saying, "The fact that some artists may not be fully referenced is a second order issue." The first issue to be addressed is what constitutes "notable". is silly, notability is from secondary sources, if there are no secondary sources then the cover version cannot be notable. Additionally, we are discussing the notability of a performance of a song, not who has performed it! (see: WP:NOTINHERITED). As I said above, I have no objection to suitably referenced items being re-added. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest then, that we agree to revert your last edit and you can re-add those that meet the criteria. This seems a fair way to proceed, especially noting that above that there were already comments about too many cover versions added. If anybody wants a list of covers AMG is the place to go, not an encyclopedia. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

text: I have reverted as per your agreement. Please feel free to re-add such recordings that are notable. You might also like to know the preferred method is as text, not as a list. Happy editing. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

text: Absolutely great work. Sorry I have not responded earlier, a wikibreak and real life intervened. Thanks for your great work. Happy editing. --Richhoncho (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

text: update, Panthus! I'll see what Reflinks can do with some of the cites. Best, Sam Sailor Sing 21:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of most cover versions. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fly Me to the Moon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131207000556/http://songwritershalloffame.org/ceremony/C3111 to http://www.songwritershalloffame.org/ceremony/C3111
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This matter is discussed in Talk:Apollo 11#Fly Me to the Moon. JustinTime55 (talk) 13:24, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was NOT played "after Aldrin stepped on the Moon" 

message: @ResolutionsPerMinute: Should the song be added to this template or not? Greetings and thanks in advance. KWiki (talk) 17:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question