Talk:HD 188753

message: This page has a request for expansion listed on it, but there is no discussion either here or on the Wikipedia:Requests for expansion page.  Anyone know what's needed?  Or should we delete the request?  --zandperl 18:50, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been there since the early days of this article.  I don't think it's needed anymore. --Der Sporkmeister 19:37, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. --zandperl 21:11, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: In the introductory paragraph: This star system is only the second triple-star system known to have a planet orbiting it, and later on: In 2005 the discovery of HD 188753 Ab was the first known planet in a triple star system.  So, which is it?  Is it the first or the second? Nik42 08:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: trinary star planetary system

message: The planet HD 188753 Ab is not currently thought to exist: a second team searching for the planet failed to find any evidence of it, and in fact showed that the data in the original discovery paper do not support the proposed planetary candidate . Having an entire article about the planet thus gives entirely too much attention to a nonexistent object. It is long past the time Maciej Konacki said he planned to have issued an update , and in any case the wording of his response to the Eggenberger et al. paper indicates that whatever solution he was investigating was an alternative to the original solution, NOT a confirmation of the original one. 86.171.72.213 (talk) 11:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: There were a few weasel words in the style of presentation. i hope it's a bit better now.
The reference for looking for updates is http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-ref_query?bibcode=2007A%26A...466.1179E&refs=CITATIONS&db_key=AST  which is the list of articles that cite Eggenberger's paper. When Konacki publishes an update, he is certain to cite the Eggenberger paper, so this seems to be a good place to look for updates. The as of template claims that logged-in users should see the link, but for me it's a style="display:none" link. Boud (talk) 08:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor cleanup 

message: HD 188753 B and HD 188753 C are rarely (if at all ) mentioned outside of the starbox. The citations used for the mass estimates fail to mention HD 188753 B and HD 188753 C completely, nevermind mass. From what it seems the system is a G8V+G??+K?? system (Two G-types and one K-type). More citations for Objects B/C are needed. Davidbuddy9 (talk) 21:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of information/Citations for HD 188753 B and HD 188753 C. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HD 188753. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091027015503/http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/12716 to http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/12716
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified