lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frank Sheeran

message: Why aren't links to FreeRepublic allowed? I found a story on FreeRepublic on how blood was found on the floorboards of the house Sheeran said he executed Jimmy Hoffa at (the FBI Crime Lab said it wasn't Hoffa's blood). The site wouldn't allow me to link to it, and I didn't have time to find an alternate source.
Just curious. Is FreeRepublic unreliable?
ThanksShemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 22:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: you mean this Free Republic?--john.james (talk) 00:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Why is this section called "Disputed Allegations"?  None are being disputed here; no contradictory information is included, and no citations given challenging the information. The one evaluation of factuality mentioned here, "While investigators did find traces of blood in the Detroit house where Sheeran confessed he killed Hoffa in, they also determined it may have been too old for conclusive testing.", simply states that, for technical reasons, no determination of fact can be made. Let's remember that the book in question is in the nature of a deathbed confession by a traditional Irish Catholic, who said things that he knew would reflect poorly on him and would cause his beloved family pain. If he had intended to lie, would it not be, rather, in the direction of avoiding responsibility and protecting his family from embarrassment and harm?  Back to the point: This can't be called "Disputed Allegations", because no allegations are being disputed here. Heavenlyblue (talk) 23:18, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A "traditional Irish Catholic" would confess on his deathbed TO A PRIEST.  In confidence that his confession would be kept private under millennia-long Papal law. NOT to some sleazy "true crime" writer out to make a buck. Sheeran is clearly a criminal of long-standing. No one would be inclined to take his statements as true before he was on his "deathbed" so why would they be considered "reliable" under these circumstances? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.152.157.50 (talk) 21:18, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's ridiculous to take his being a Catholic as evidence that he didn't confess to a journalist, or whatever you wish to call him. He could have confessed to a priest, and we'll never know (not because of "Papal law" - more Catholic doctrine), but that doesn't preclude him confessing to anyone else. The existence of the sacrament of confession makes no difference here.86.31.139.254 (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed Allegations
Talk:Frank Snepp

message: If I'm not wrong, it is said that he loved a Vietnamese woman name Mai who commited suicide when she was left in Can Tho. @pple complain 18:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he didn't know her fate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.237.183.82 (talk) 19:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:F. W. Taussig

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://homepage.newschool.edu/het//profiles/taussig.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:18, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Franz von Rintelen

message: Hey, can someone explain this sentence:  'Arriving in New York City, he posed as a businessman and, with Heinrich Albert, set up a dummy corporation called Bridgeport Projectile, through which he purchased gunpowder, which he then destroyed.'  Is the idea here that by buying munitions and destroying them, it hampered wartime production efforts/allied supply chains?  Maybe that's meant to be evident.  Or maybe I have it wrong????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.128.210 (talk) 23:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Frater Albertus

message: I don't really know for sure, but I believe modern alchemy, Albertus included, refused to teach the spagyric process with animal products, due to moral concerns.--207.81.87.20 18:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal kingdom? 

message: Although I really appreciated what the writer of the article had to say about his poetry, and despite the fact that the article writer made me want to read the poetry, I am concerned that wikipedia is not the place for a literary review--207.81.87.20 18:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Sir Frederick Eden, 2nd Baronet

message: Karl Marx wrote that Eden was "the only disciple of Adam Smith during the eighteenth century that produced any work of any importance"' (DNB). However, he also criticized his advocacy of expropriation of the poor and vulnerable by the ruling classes. In Capital, Marx cites Eden: "It may, perhaps be worthy the attention of the public to consider, whether any manufacture, which, in order to be carried on successfully, requires that cottages and workhouses should be ransacked for poor children; that they should be employed by turns during the greater part of the night and robbed of that rest which, though indispensable to all, is most required by the young; and that numbers of both sexes, of different ages and dispositions, should be collected together in such a manner that the contagion of example cannot but lead to profligacy and debauchery; will add to the sum of individual or national felicity?"
Isn't this quote from Eden the exact opposite of advocacy ?  It is giving reasons why this 'expropriation' is utterly wrong.
Not the first time old Karl got things screwed up.
Claverhouse (talk) 05:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence and Legacy
Talk:Oral Fixation Tour (album)

message: I don't know, just to point out, but she recorded the Puerto Rican concert for the DVD. There were papers in the doors indicating that the concert would be recorded, and Shakira herself said it on stage. The date of the concert was December 15, 2006, and featured the North American set list, rather than the Latin American set list (replacing Dia de Enero with Underneath Your clothes, and adding "Hey You"). 
Patriota 07:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puerto Rico recordings... 

message: The concert in the DVD will be the one from Miami on december 9th. as you can see on sony's official website. maybe the puerto rico concert was recorded to be shown on TV as were the concerts from Rusia, Romania, Dubai, Argentina and India. you should really research before claiming something Patriota.
Claiming? I'm just pointing out stuff to make it more informative. Also, it was never aired on TV. She said it herself in stage before starting the concert. I KNOW that the main will be in Miami, but it's like "Live and Off The record". It IS on Rotterdam, but sometimes on some songs you can see DIFFERENT arenas and coliseums. I never wanted to claim something, just pointing out some stuff she said in the concert, because I actually don't care, I will buy the DVD anyways. :D:D
Besides, it's not my information, it's what she said, it's NOT my fault if production changes mind AFTER the concert. ;)
Patriota 00:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miami Recordings 

message: Acording to Wal Mart.com, their DVD/CD combo includes 2 bonus audio tracks. However, doesn't list them. Does anyone hve info on this?
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=8001673#About+the+Album
Thats the link. WOuld be nice to put it on the main article.
Patriota 22:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonus Tracks...
Talk:Fused profession

message: Somebody decided to put the WikiProject Biography banner here. I removed it. This page is not a biography.  — AnnaKucsma   Speak! 18:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography???

message: I can confirm that South Australia does indeed has a number of chambers and independant barristers. While the profession is not legally spilt, a lawyer in SA general practices as either a solicter in a law firm or a barrister in chambers. --121.45.85.196 (talk) 02:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed SA
Talk:Gabrielle Pizzi

message: I’ve been told her daughter Samantha also died this year 2022. 2401:D002:3502:500:9462:441D:8760:3D82 (talk) 20:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samantha pizzi
Talk:Gala Galaction

message: Apparently, Gala Galaction wrote a manifesto that was later signed by Conon Arămescu Donici, for which he was later accused of betrayal.
I found these quotes about the issue in two books on Google Books:
:[...] Este vorba de manifestul către armată, girat cu numele mitropolitului Conon-Arămescu Donici. Proiectul manifestului fusese redactat de către Gala Galaction, la cererea ministrului de resort, Virgil Arion. 
:Conceput iniţial ca un manifest al ierarhilor către populaţia Moldovei, documentul a fost ulterior modificat şi retuşat subversiv, de persoane necunoscute lui Galaction, pentru a fi aruncat de către aviatorii germani în tranşeele româneşti. Gala Galaction analizează pe larg conjunctura care a determinat, în vara anului 1917, redactarea acelui manifest în Jumal, Ediţie îngrijită, prefaţă şi note de Teodor Vârgolici, Bucureşti, Editura Minerva, 1977, voi. II, p. 34-42.
:După primul război mondial, Gala Galaction a fost acuzat din nou, mai virulent, de filogermanism, de pactizare cu armatele ocupante. Capetele de acuzare constau în faptul că, în timpul ocupaţiei germane, a rămas în Bucureşti şi că el ar fi autorul manifestului demobilizator aruncat în spatele frontului românesc din Moldova. 
:Consemnările din Jurnal (voi. II, p. 36 — 42), a căror probitate etică nu poate fi pusă la îndoială, sunt însă pe deplin edificatoare, demonstrează că Gala Galaction a fost infinit depărtat de orice colaboraţionism cu ocupanţii germani. Deşi a rămas în Bucureşti în timpul ocupaţiei, datorită în primul rînd greutăţilor [...]
so it seems that we need to read his Journal to know exactly the circumstances. bogdan (talk) 12:50, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manifesto to the Romanian Army 
Talk:Gayle Moran

message: Surely we can find a photo from her mid-Seventies career? At the time of her solo album and Mahavishnu days, she was a quite attractive lady and got a small amount of press copy. Is there nothing out there we can use? 104.169.45.63 (talk) 11:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  the photo . . .
Talk:Geoff Wolinetz

message: Subject does not appear to meet notability standards; there appear to be only a few mentions in the press and nothing approaching significant coverage. Flowanda | Talk 00:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Geoffrey of Vinsauf

message: The balance here seems to be more about Murphy than about Vinsauf! Talk about the tail wagging the dog, I don't want to know about Murphy's ideas, I want to know about Vinsauf. Please find some more sources and commentaries and present a better balanced meme. If necessary, use primary sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.96.229.35 (talk) 09:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source and Commentary 

message: Geoffrey of Vinsauf does not himself seem to meet notability; however, his work does, most of which has been studied in relation to the Poetria nova. As I get time, I plan to work on a rewrite centered around that in my sandbox, before officially proposing this. Wyrdwritere (talk) 03:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to move to ''Poetria nova''
Talk:Fizz (cocktail)

message: This is a new article I'm still working on.  If you feel a strong desire to edit it, please wait a few days or leave me feedback on my talk page. Philvarner 06:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A fresh start

message: This is the place to discuss the requested moves listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves#8 February 2007 concerning Gin Fizz and Ramos gin fizz. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 07:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: "The drink's long mixing time (12 minutes)..."
Personally, I think this crys out for amplification -- why 12 minutes?  Is it shaken this whole time?  If so, is it still made this way or do they use a blender now?  Inquiring minds and all that.  Zlama (talk) 04:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ramos Gin Fizz 

message: I see nothing has happened on this for five years, but...what about giving the egg-based drinks their own page?  They require special handling, which isn't dealt with here at all, except to say that some bartenders use powdered egg whites for health and safety reasons -- which I question, anyway, because it's probably more a matter of economy, if the original drink with the fresh eggs takes 12 minutes of prep time, and that practice probably preceded the Salmonella scares/awareness of the 1980s, anyway.  Zlama (talk) 04:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egg-based drinks page?
Talk:Holland Performing Arts Center

message: Please do not make lists out of content in this article. Lists minimize the effect of an encyclopedia by reducing content to its bare bones. Also, please avoid using promotional language in the article, as well. This is not a brochure. Also, any additions to the article should be cited. – Freechild (BoomCha) 07:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Making lists
Talk:Byte addressing

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: The first paragraph of the article says
However, the references for "byte machines" and "word machines" are both in German; are those terms used in English?  If not, then, while mentioning the equivalent German terms might be appropriate in German Wikipedia articles about byte addressing and word addressing (BTW, I'm not convinced that de:8-Bit-Architektur is the appropriate equivalent page to byte addressing - it's about 8-bit processors, not byte-addressed processors with a larger bit width), it wouldn't be appropriate in this article. Guy Harris (talk) 22:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Never heard of a byte machine and I don't speak German. ~Kvng (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Are the terms "byte machine" and "word machine" used in English?
Talk:George H. Bryan

message: says "He was able to encapsulate in a pair of equations the design features and conditions necessary to keep an aircraft stable. The problem was these equations couldn’t be solved without knowing certain parameters that depended on how initial forces acting on the aircraft’s surfaces altered its motion about its three axes." - Rod57 (talk) 16:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What were his two equations 

message: “ In 1911, a year after the Wright brothers' successful flight, he published Stability in Aviation (Macmillan).” – the Wright brothers’ successful flight was in 1903, wasn’t it? 49.180.18.181 (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Wright brothers
Talk:Street Fighter (2008 film)

message: *Umm the article's just been created. Hang on. Give it some time to grow. Also, I've provided my source so there's no way to contest it. And there's not enough information atm so that's why we have to wait for it to grow. (Lord Vader 06:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tell you what, I'll remove the speedy if you can come up with some more verifiable information about it... changing to prod. Philippe Beaudette 06:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I'll try to find 1 or 2 more sources. Because I know I've seen it somewhere else as well. And one source should be good enough though (Lord Vader 06:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here. I already found some others. I'll add them.
*http://www.cinemablend.com/games/New-Street-Fighter-Movie-Set-For-2008-1477.html
*http://movies.ign.com/articles/742/742504p1.html
IGN has it so that should be enough. (Lord Vader 06:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion

message: *
:Casting rumors to keep an eye on. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 19:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations for use
Talk:George Kaiser

message: I've removed the unreliable source tag for the Giving Pledge because source 28 (as of my edit) is the website of the Giving Pledge where he is listed as having made the pledge.  However the date when source 28 was accessed is about the time the tag was added.  If I've missed some sort of policy or obvious fact please feel free to put it back.  If possible could any one doing that leave me a message so I know for the future.Dolive21 (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source 

message: Please note a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard which, in part, discusses whether the Sunlight Foundation may be deemed a reliable source for contentious claims in this article. See WP:RSN#Koch Industries and Sunlight Foundation Blog. --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:13, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sunlight Foundation
Talk:George Lane (technical analyst)

message: Lane initially started trading on the side years ago, when he and his father were practicing medicine together in a clinic that was located  in an industrial area of Chicago. The family decided to close the clinic when Lane’s father was ready to retire. www.trading-naked.com/.../George%20Lane-Father%20of%20Stochastics.pdf, - Oster Dow Jones Commodity news, June 2003, pg 41
-oo0(GoldTrader)0oo- (talk) 07:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page was identified as including a disambiguation error based on the term "The Academy".
In order to resolve this problem I have removed the wikilink from the term as I am unable to determine, from the context, what the term is referring to.  If you wish to restore the link please ensure that the term and the link are fully resolved. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 03:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Academy" Disambiguation
Talk:Nebraska Raceway Park

message: Hi Dingo Overlord, I saw your edits while doing Page Curation, but I have reverted this page to an old version, because the text that's been here since 2015 is promotional and doesn't meet Wikipedia standards. If you want to refer to that text, you can click the "view history" tab to see the old versions. --Slashme (talk) 07:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted
Talk:George Robertson (publisher)

message: Moments ago I removed (compare versions) one full paragraph that belongs to George Robertson (bookseller) (1825–1898). Both were both bookseller and publisher, this one decades later and only in partnership or corporation.
Our cited source Dictionary of Australian Biography: R covers these two GR consecutively, with the offending content in the last sentence on GR the elder (no relation). It's already in our biography of GR the elder.
There may be other confusions of the two GR here at EN.wiki. 
Last hour I removed a Wikidata claim that Angus & Robertson (this man's partnership or corporation) succeeded George Robertson & Company (the other's, if it was yet "and Company" during his time --our biog implies not). --P64 (talk) 15:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the wrong George Robertson
Talk:Serian Division

message: This article is too subjective!Dasyornis (talk) 04:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

message: This article seems to talk about a town (Serian, Sarawak) rather than a division (Serian Division). Should we move it, and the create a new article for the division itself? FikkuFiq 12:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town or Division?
Talk:George Sylvester Viereck

message: Intrested in Nikola Tesla(1856-1943) Friend of Vierick as mentioned in article. Wondering if Dr. Tesla was also "suspect" of Pro German leanings as was Vireick? Maybe even "watched" by FBI/Their conversations recordred? Are there any recordings or newsreel footgaes of George Sylvester Vierick? Thanks!Andreisme (talk) 19:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intrested in Vierick beacuse of his Tesla friendship. 

message: George sylvester Vierick and great inventor Nikola teslas ere freinds.tesla considering himself a poet too!  No mention in article of this! D104.34.181.144 (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of Viericks friendship with Inventor Nikola Tesla 

message: To add to this article: mention of his relationship with the U.S. lawmaker Ernest Lundeen. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sundayclose (talk) 14:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

text: No one is being unprofessional. The issue isn't whether it should be added. The issue is citing to a reliable source. A source in another article without a source in this article is insufficient. Each article stands on its own. Read WP:V. If someone wants to add with a citation, go ahead. Sundayclose (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:George T. Delacorte Jr.

message: Where does the year 1894 come from? Most seemingly serious sources appear to have the birth year 1893. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 10:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year
Talk:Georges Ifrah

message: While i'm greatly impressed by the vision of his thinking and scope of his sources in Vol. 1 (which book i have at hand), i take the critiques cited by our bio on the accompanying article (esp. that of Vol.2, to which review i've so far given a the longer look) seriously enuf to see our use of him in refs problematic. In a line, he's self-trained, and an expert in his field has accused him of rampant errors both major and minor, at least in the second volume; IMO there's a prima facie case that he is not entitled to a presumption that citations of his work meet our criteria for RS. I.e., that each citation of him as a source needs an individual defense of his reliability re that specific assertion.   What i propose to proceed with in the next 24 is tagging the approx 50 articles that appear to cite him with a somewhat harsh template for the Vol 1 citations, and a harsher one for the Vol 2 citations. I base that distinction on my first (i.e. tentative) impression from the 2-part professional scholarly review in a major journal (links in our bio article) that vol 2 is grossly inferior in thoro-ness and accuracy to vol 1 (which is likely to be provocative enuf to indeed become a classic even if he's full of crap!).    Input from colleagues is more than welcome!--Jerzy•t 20:59 21:04, & 21:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I said "[within] the next 24 [hours]", but actually i'm not going to be able to spend more time on it this week.--Jerzy•t 02:57, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that criticism. Suggested reading, C. Philipp E. Nothaft: Medieval Europe’s satanic ciphers: on the genesis of a modern mythesp. Sect. 3.3 and references therein. --Rainald62 (talk) 22:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generally not valid as a WP reference
Talk:Gerald Lehner

message: Why are you deleting the second part of the article? Sebestie 08:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

message: here with regards to birth date and occupation. — scribblingwoman 14:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made separate articles for the two different people who were covered by the article and converted this article into a disambiguation page. __meco (talk) 00:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction