Talk:Executive Office of the President of the United States

message: I deleted the following sentence from the first paragraph of the article: "In contrast to the agencies of the Federal government such as the United States Department of State, all of the people within the EOP serve with the President and when there is a new President, the entire office is reconstituted." In actuality, there are hundreds of regular government employees (i.e., not political appointees) employed by the Executive Office of the President. Many of those employees stay at the EOP across administrations, even across administrations of different political parties. - Walkiped 17:38, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted sentence

message: Condi Rice resigned her post as National Security Advisor to become Secretary of State. I'll remove her and add Stephen Hadley, her successsor. Someone should check to see what other positions have changed now that Bush is in his second term.
--Boetron 16:09, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: No More Condi!

message: Hey, can anyone let me know is the power of EOP confined to executive functions?  Do the executives have the legislative power? and is it those executives = the heads of govt. depts. in the US? and is it the executives who choose the cabinet members?
I would be thankful for your generous help!  scarlett_tong 14:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: EOP power

message: Remove "Miles Mosman is not a douche, but a man"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.83.235.182 (talk) 21:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: wikilobbying

message: Isn't it technically the "Executive Office of the President"?  Shouldn't this be the name of the article? Parler Vous (edits) 10:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I have slightly altered the layout of this page, and organised the Offices depending on their position within the EOP or as entities of the White House Office, some of the Offices are no longer listed on the White House website but I will presume they still exist until told otherwise so I have made a best guess, primarily based on their names, at their locations. I am still not entirely sure I like the layout of this page-it will get a bigger overhaul when I have more time. Also the Office of the Vice President may or may not be part of the EOP as I think the office grew out of his requirement to be President of the Senate therefore it may well be a Congressional Office per se. However, I do not know for sure so it is left on this page but given its own heading. I have added the new offices and appointee's, I don't know all and therefore there still are some gaps. Benny45boy (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good question to which I don't know, the whitehouse.gov website still is a little slow at updating. 92.0.212.150 (talk) 10:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Overhaul

message: In my opinion, the White House Office should be listed first within the section "Entities in the Executive Office of the President" for the following reasons:
* The Chief of Staff, who supervises the entire Executive Office of the President, is housed administratively in the White House Office.
* The White House Office is a substantial unit, within several offices contained within it.
VanCity99 (talk) 10:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate where you are coming from, but the page it self makes reference both in the introduction and in the infobox that the Office of the Chief of Staff is the head of both the White House Office and the Executive Office of the President. I feel that by altering the article breaks up the style and gives it a slightly disjointed nature. This however is just my opinion, your thoughts are welcome.Benny45boy (talk) 11:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: White House Office should be first

message: Why is the National Economic Council nowhere to be found on this page? Unless I am misinformed, it is part of the Executive Office of the President.
Proxtown (talk) 21:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this and other agencies were accidentally removed. They're back in.Poshzombie (talk) 02:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: National Economic Council

message: There is vandalism on the "Trump Executive Office" Template. A user puts a penis in the graph, when I remove it they place it back. Would you be able to remove it? Thank you. Fritz1543 (talk) 04:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This duplicates a message at Template talk:Trump Executive Office, where it is more appropriate. It's much better not to duplicate messages in this way, as it has no benefit, it takes up extra time for whoever who checks the requests for help and closes the extra one, and it runs the risk of someone putting time into dealing with one of the requests, not knowing that the matter has already been dealt with as a result of the other request. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question for administrator 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Executive Office of the President of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008182342/http://openregs.com/agencies/view/179/executive_office_of_the_president to http://openregs.com/agencies/view/179/executive_office_of_the_president
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: From 2008-2017, the table uses numbers from the Appropriations committee's proposed budget. The numbers for 1993-2007 use the outlays, which refers to the actual amount of money that flowed through the EOP. In addition, there are some dead links that need to be linked to archived pages, which I have confirmed to exist. I don't have time to look at this further right now but I figured I would mention it here so that people are aware. ―NK1406 talk•contribs 15:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budgets/Outlays 

message: This section was a description of the role of the executive branch of the federal government.  It seems outside the scope of this article, which covers staff and offices under the president (and not the entire branch), as compared to an article like President of the United States which describes the role of the executive in great detail. 2600:8801:3708:700:D42B:A741:8F57:37BC (talk) 16:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted section on "Executive Role"

message: I'm curious if there are good sources on the dramatic change in the EOP budget from 2004-2007? Jmbranum (talk) 02:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Dramatic change of EOP budget from 2004-2007?

message: I'm not planning to take any action on it, but I'm just throwing this out there for consideration.  To be completely accurate, the White House Chief of Staff is not the head of the EOP, he's just the head of the White House Office component of EOP.  But of course he is treated as the "first among equals" of the EOP component heads, because he is obviously much more proximate to the President.  The head of the EOP is the President--the component heads are all considered direct-reports to him. -- Asdasdasdff (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  EOP "agency executive"