Talk:The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay

message: I have expaned the TCoR: Butcher Bay page's Synopsis section and have changed it to the "Story" section. I have added "Weapons", "Items", "Mission Items", and have started a "Characters" section. If no one else will expand that section, I will get to it eventually, if all possible. BishopTutu 21:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First off, note the signature time at the end of the message: this, obviously, was done a long time ago, and, obviously again, someone has changed it. Second, like I have stated in the edit summaries of my recent edits, Pope Joe does jack shit to give Riddick the eyeshine; the voice that begins to talk states that she is giving him a gift: the eyeshine; this is made obvious when, not 2 seconds after she says this, Riddick receives the eyeshine. Pope Joe even seems a bit surprised when he sees Riddick's eyes. There is no proof that Pope Joe does anything to Riddick's eyes, so it will not be stated in the article as such.  ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §  Contributions ♣ 04:03, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Riddick accuses Pope Joe of giving him it; Pope Joe responds that he's only fixed his arm. This is explicitly shown and and should be stated in the article as such.  ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §  Contributions ♣ 14:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I didn't ruin anything; my version was completely grammatically correct, except for maybe one thing near the beginning. My version was not as in-universe as the current version is. This current version also has loads of irrelevant information and its size is getting close to violating WP:PLOT; go acquaint yourself with a few Wikipedia policies, the actual TCoR: Butcher Bay plot, and perhaps an English book before accusing someone of ruining something.  ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §  Contributions ♣ 00:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Hmm, I distinctly recall saying something along the lines of "actually go read some of the Wikipedia policies before trying to edit," yet you still haven't done so, because, if you did, you would have realized that when someone adds such words as "the character" and things of that nature, its called OUT-OF-UNIVERSE WRITING, and not "amateurish," as you describe it. Don't come here thinking your just some Harvard class writer and then screw stuff up. And also, about my "poor syntax," I'll admit, it was poor, but the only reason I did that is cause of laziness; I'm getting incredibly tired of users coming here and repetitively, and incorrectly, editing articles, even when someoen shows them why they are wrong. It also strikes me funny that you criticize my edits when you put in such incorrect edits, such as when you said that Johns escorts him to the single max area when its really Abbott. Maybe this time around, you will actually go reacquaint yourself with the Butcher Bay plot and use an above-3rd grade level intelligence and go read some Wikipedia policies, and I don't give a shit if i used "poor syntax" just then.  ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §  Contributions ♣ 03:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, first off, calling me a "dipshit" is a violation of a Wikipedia policy, so I'd advise not doing it again. Second, it still amazes me how, even though I told you, in plain letters, the reason why I add the words "the character:" ITS BECAUSE ITS CALLED OUT-OF-UNIVERSER WRITING, SOMETHING STATED IN A WIKIPEDIA POLICY. Screw "messiness;" don't use your own screwed sense of discretion in a place that you don't know jack crap about. Here's a tip: GO READ THE FREAKING WIKIPEDIA POLICIES I DIRECTED YOU TO BEFORE EDITING THIS ARTICLE AGAIN. If you don't do it now, that would be just sad.  ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §  Contributions ♣ 13:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Heh, I see where this is going. I know too well. I think it's best for both of us, or, rather, you, if this discussion discontinued.  ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §  Contributions ♣ 01:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Page Expansion

message: Should mention of it be made here?
Yes it should, maybe a short paragraph. If nobody writes one, I don't mind doing it.
Razoroo 21:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remake for the 360

message: ==OPenGL 1.3 problem with this game and SBZengine.exe error.
If you are having trouble with the error requires graphic driver support for OpenGL 1.3 and/or sbzengine.exe error and the demo of the games works fine then one solution for The Chronicles of Riddick Escape from Butcher Bay Developers Cut version 1.x is to use the demos version of sbzengine.exe and rndrgl.dll.  One can copy them from:
Program Files\Starbreeze Studios\Riddick EFBB Demo\System\Win32_x86_SSE2 to 
Program Files\Starbreeze Studios\Riddick EFBB\System\Win32_x86_SSE2 
and copy  rndrgl.dll from 
Program Files\Starbreeze Studios\Riddick EFBB Demo\System\Win32_x86_SSE to 
Program Files\Starbreeze Studios\Riddick EFBB\System\Win32_x86_SSE
This works for Windows XP Pro with SP3 on an AMD 32 bit processor with an NVIDIA graphics card.  Also, I tried the patch from sierra and it still did not work but the above did. Mystic Witch 19:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenGL 1.3 support errror & SBZengine.exe error 

message: There's no reason this can't be a GA.  My suggestions are as follows:
:Comprehensiveness - There should be a Development section.  Also, the Reception section needs to be expanded; I'll start working on that.
:Layout - The Windows version section and Assault on Dark Athena should probably be subsections of the aforementioned Development section.
:List - The credits list isn't necessary as it currently stands.  Notable cast should be parenthesized/wikilinked in Plot after character names, or there should be a blurb about each character/actor if there's enough information (like Star Wars: The Force Unleashed, for instance).
Let's get to work. —  Levi van Tine (t – c) 06:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA tally-ho 

message: Sure, one review says that ammo is sparse, but you get an entire clip from every enemy. Should it actually be in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.169.163.44 (talk) 03:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ammo is sparse?