Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Massachusetts/Archive 1

message: Here's a discussion I've started at Template_talk:Infobox_City regarding our infobox, Template:Infobox Town MA.  The first paragraph is copied from there, in case someone wanted to continue the discussion here.  Markles 18:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Lowell High School (Lowell, Massachusetts) was put up for deletion today. Cleanup time, baby! karmafist 02:03, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey Guys, Just Thought You Should Know

message: On a somewhat related note, there is a discussion going on at Mitt Romney about whether to include the title "His Excellency" at the beginning of the article. Since he is the governor of Massachusetts, I thought people here might want to weigh in at Talk:Mitt Romney with their thoughts. thanks,--Alhutch 08:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is resolved.  See Talk:Mitt Romney. -Markles 14:04, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mitt Romney]] 

message: I added a to-do list at the top of the page, it's just a few things i've noticed that I think need to be done.  Feel free to add to it.  Also, I included the 2004 democratic convention, but i'm not sure if it fits or not...--jfg284 you were saying? 11:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Great great great job!! When it's no longer tentative, should it get moved to the main project page instead of this talk page? -Markles 14:04, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "To start a new to-do list:
* go to the talk page of the article
* edit it
* at the top of the edit box, enter 
* blah, blah blah...the point is, it says here to do it on the talk page.  PRobably because a todo list is designed for articles, not projects; it may be appropriate to put it on the main page here.  And the only reason it's tentative is because it's totally arbitrary: i noticed not all cities or towns have the info box, so there's a good chance theyre no where NEAR standard.  I also noticed our namesake article isn't featured, and figured we might as well bring that Up to snuff, too.  And i took a suggestion from this talk page.  There's a ton more we could "bring up to FA status", but in theory that's the idea of all of our edits, so i figured listing 900 h articles to "improve" would defeat the purpose.  If anyone has any other suggestions for tasks, suggest them here - or just add them to the table.  And, lastly, on the topic of the first two "standardize"tasks - what do people think of a weekely town/city collaberation?  This would be a good way of concentrating our efforts and improving the city/town articles.  --jfg284 you were saying? 14:31, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To-Do

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an A-Class review process for United States related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion. Kumioko (talk) 02:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal for United States A-Class review process

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool