Talk:United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo

message: officially Kosovo and Metohia
Is not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hipi Zhdripi (talk • contribs) 02:44, 29 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments by Hipi Zhdripi 

message: Everybody,who doesn´t accept UNMIK , but is writing for kosovo, is just making propaganda. it has nothing to do with english language. With people like that, i don t need to have a discussion. If you are able to accept UNMIK, than we can have a discussion.
First of all : UNMIK ! What does it mean ?</br>
UNMIK stands for United Nation Mission in KOSOVO.</br>
In Kosovo ! There are no words for Serbian teritory or things like that. If you would be so nice, to have a look to the homepage from UNMIK, you can see yourself : there are no words for Kosovo in serbian territory . They are just writing " ...in the war-ravaged province of Kosovo... "</br>
Than you can read this :
# perform basic civilian administrative functions;
# promote the establishment of substantial autonomy and self-government in Kosovo;
# facilitate a political process to determine Kosovo's future status;
# coordinate humanitarian and disaster relief of all international agencies;
# support the reconstruction of key infrastructure;
# maintain civil law and order;
# promote human rights; and
# assure the safe and unimpeded return of all refugees and displaced persons to their homes in Kosovo.
That means, Kosovo doesn t have a status( it s war - ravaged ! ). It s just a province, administrated by UNMIK,and nothing else. It doesn t belong to any other state or country.</br>
UNMIK is there to help the kosovars to decide for their future.Every other offical reference, like offical serbian - or offical albanian reference, is just propaganda.</br>
From that point of knowledge, our discussion is, like I would say Serbia or Albania is a province in China.</br>
All articles with the subject " Kosovo ", which have to do with information or references BEFORE the 10. june 1999 belongs to the article " History of Kosovo ". In an other case, I ll delete it , because i took it like propaganda and not like neutral information for Wikipedia. People in this discussion, who don t accept UNMIK, aren t neutral. They are living in an own dreamworld, what has nothing to do with reallity and they are using the Wikipedia for their own propaganda.
If somebody think, that I m wrong, please show me. But please argue with informations from an OFFICIAL document, accepted from UNMIK and not with an dokument from national offical propaganda informations.</br> 
We can have a disskussion with facts from UNMIK, not with the past. Wikipedia  stands for knowledge and shouldn t have to become a place for national propaganda, no matter if it s serbian or albanian propaganda. In other case serbian and albanian people will ravage it, like they ve ravaged Kosovo.--Hipi Zhdripi 20:47, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNMIK 

message: I removed the WP:LE tag because it doesn't seem to fit. Seems better off in UN EMT1871 10:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:LE tag 

message: The figure of 250,000 displaced people from Kosovo is a Serbian government figure - that the UNHCR is obliged to use - and is exaggerated.
The European Stability Initiative's 2004 report, The Lausanne Principle: Multiethnicity, Territory and the Future of Kosovo's Serbs http://www.esiweb.org/index.php?lang=tr&id=156&document_ID=53  has controversially estimated that there are perhaps only 65,000 Kosovo Serb IDPs living in Serbia (outside Kosovo).  Certainly if there are 130,000 Serbs (the usual estimate) living in Kosovo, that would figure - the 1991 census figure for K Serbs was 195,301 plus 20,045 Montenegrins and it seems probable that numbers declined further after 1991. Howard Clark (talk) 08:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: number of displaced exaggerated 

message: Today in Prishtina, the head of Pillar IV, announced that as of the 30th of June 2008 Pillar IV will stop operating and will hand over all of its duties to the government of Kosova.
Here is the link in albanian, I am sure they will posted it in english on their site as well.
http://www.rtklive.com/?newsId=19898
Jawohl (talk) 11:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNMIK Pillar IV to stop operating 

message: I did not get why the info box was removed. It contained and gave important info at one glimpse to the fast reader who does not want to get through the whole article to gather the info he wants. --Tubesship (talk) 13:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What type of Infobox is most appropriate: UN mission (ie. Infobox UN), infobox: Country or Infobox: Former Country? Tlongers (talk) 08:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box removed? Why? 

message: isnt saying ""representatives of the people of Kosovo" and didn't represent the Assembly itself" not neutral? i think that should be taken out, that is another discusion if they represented Kosovo or not, but this is about the UN mission --Gimelthedog (talk) 12:19, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  not neutral 

message: The opening sentence read "The United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo or UNMIK was the interim civilian administration in Kosovo, under the authority of the United Nations." That wording refers to UNMIK in the past tense as if it no longer exists. That is not correct. I've made some edits to make clear that it still exists...I've tried to be balanced about it - I don't say UNMIK is running the country/province today, but it is still the UN Mission in Kosovo. It's actual mandate is exactly the same today as it was in 1999. Obviously its day to day role is very different. Frenchmalawi (talk) 19:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work! Thanks. bobrayner (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNMIK still exists ! 

message: Japinderum inserted this into the article again:
At a meeting of the Assembly of Kosovo most of its members and other representatives of the people of Kosovo, acting outside the UNMIK's PISG framework (not representing the Assembly or any other of these institutions),The identity of the authors of the declaration of independence, ICJ ruling, par.102-109 ...
However, the source says nothing of the sort. So, I have removed it. Multiple reliable sources put it quite simply; the assembly declared independence. It is unfortunate that several articles have had something very different put in them. bobrayner (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Whar are you saying, that is really not true. This explanation is in source, you maybe missed it. That was main reason for icj to say that declaration was legal, it would not be that it was declared by assembly. I will add more sources about this, but definition is almost identical to source! For more, see here. --WhiteWriterspeaks 10:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Countless reliable sources simply talk about the assembly. You have reached into an obscure paragraph of a court document in order to cherrypick a sentence which puts caveats around the "assembly" in order to completely change the tone and pretend that it's illegitimate. That's a Bad Thing; not a Good Thing. bobrayner (talk) 20:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis and special pleading, again 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120304055530/http://www.newkosovareport.com/20071127235/Business-and-Economy/KTA-only-Kosovo-Institutions-can-privatize-Brezovica.html to http://www.newkosovareport.com/20071127235/Business-and-Economy/KTA-only-Kosovo-Institutions-can-privatize-Brezovica.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090703085608/http://www.unmikonline.org:80/archives/EUinKosovo/uk/about/about_bios.php to http://www.unmikonline.org/archives/euinkosovo/uk/about/about_bios.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110629013848/http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070202/ts_afp/serbiakosovounstatusproposal_070202162726;_ylt=Ap9g4N..BOD23p6b5WY2sqsXxHcA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl to http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070202/ts_afp/serbiakosovounstatusproposal_070202162726;_ylt=Ap9g4N..BOD23p6b5WY2sqsXxHcA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120319112437/http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070310/wl_nm/serbia_kosovo1_dc_4;_ylt=AvL5xEUliSVd9RrxZLjpSI8XxHcA to http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070310/wl_nm/serbia_kosovo1_dc_4;_ylt=AvL5xEUliSVd9RrxZLjpSI8XxHcA
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120525235352/http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/europe/balkans/177_kosovo_status___delay_is_risky.pdf to http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/europe/balkans/177_kosovo_status___delay_is_risky.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141223075446/http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu:80/en/info/whatisEulex.php to http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu/en/info/whatisEulex.php
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131022143615/http://www.ico-kos.org/f/pdf/COMMUNIQUE16thISG-Eng.pdf to http://www.ico-kos.org/f/pdf/COMMUNIQUE16thISG-Eng.pdf
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5rRB9e3bz to http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/15987.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071013123632/http://web.amnesty.org:80/actforwomen/stories-9-eng to http://web.amnesty.org/actforwomen/stories-9-eng
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070930014538/http://www.kosovo.net/news/archive/2006/July_26/1.html to http://www.kosovo.net/news/archive/2006/July_26/1.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070318160637/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/ap/un_kosovo to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/un_kosovo;_ylt=As7I249q_nofClx8rnKE6LYXxHcA
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071013123632/http://web.amnesty.org:80/actforwomen/stories-9-eng to http://web.amnesty.org/actforwomen/stories-9-eng
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080216011030/http://www.unmikonline.org/press/reports/N9917289.pdf to http://www.unmikonline.org/press/reports/N9917289.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071013123632/http://web.amnesty.org:80/actforwomen/stories-9-eng to http://web.amnesty.org/actforwomen/stories-9-eng
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070310/wl_nm/serbia_kosovo1_dc_4%3B_ylt%3DAvL5xEUliSVd9RrxZLjpSI8XxHcA
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518102355/http://www.kosovo.undp.org/repository/docs/EWR15FinalENG.pdf to http://www.kosovo.undp.org/repository/docs/EWR15FinalENG.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified