lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Electronic control unit

message: For me the external links looked very much like advertisement because of all the buy options on this websites, so I removed them. 
The text for the ecutesting for example says as you can see below testing & technical information but I could only find price lists and repairing options with telephone numbers of the garage at the first glance. Also www.qualitycustomparts.com doesn't sound like a link where you can get information about ECUs in general. A bit like writing an article about cows and posting the link to my favorit steak restaurant :-P
*ECU testing & technical information
*ECM Codes Revealed
--153.96.161.212 (talk) 13:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: For my understanding On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) is not a type of control unit but a functionality which may be implemented within 194.15.135.12 (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  OBD not type of control unit
Talk:VANOS

message: At the beginning of the page it says that VANOS is a ‘Pharmaceutical product’...can someone who’s intimate with editing this page, please edit the article and rename the description or subtitle ?
Best Regards,
Dave - gto3deuces
gto3deuces@gmail.com GTO3DEUCES (talk) 21:02, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page description says it’s a ‘Pharmaceutical product’ ?
Talk:ReAxs

message: Convince me that there is even a single notable feature of this suspension. You have one week, then I'll propose it for deletion. Greglocock 20:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD?

message: Changed to redirect after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReAxs CitiCat ♫ 04:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected
Talk:Active valve control system

message: This page is meant to talk about AVCS; however after the first section, it switches to just talking about AVLS, which is a carbon-copy of the details from the AVLS page, and totally incorrect.
I'll see if I can find an older revision that has the correct info. 
Update: I couldn't find it, so have deleted i-ALVS section and replaced with a quick, but correct, summary of AVCS.
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dryfter (talk • contribs) 06:36, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AVCS vs AVLS 

message: Now there's nothing on AVLS on this site, that I can find. (Your link goes to something else.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.200.202.244 (talk) 21:51, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Dubious Edit, Dryfter 

message: Subaru AVLS (a.k.a. iAVLS) is ubiquitous on cheaper models and is completely different from AVCS. At present, searching for "AVLS" goes to a page about telematics (e.g. OnStar) and searching for iAVLS goes nowhere. This resulted from a dubious edit made by user Dryfter, which I initially brought up in October 2012 (see above). AVLS is a lobe-switching system; AVCS is a cam-timing modulation system. Dryfter removed a section of this page which described AVLS and contrasted it with AVCS. I think we agree that AVLS is not necessarily a topic for the AVCS page, but it's even worse to have nothing at all on AVLS, which is where Dryfter's edit has left us.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.200.202.244 (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dryfter's edit still has not been fixed!
Talk:Foreign Correspondents' Club

message: Several of the correspondents' clubs listed (such as the one in Cambodia) are - in fact - for profit organizations run by individuals or corporations. Should they be listed in the same place as the non-profit journalist-run organizations like the Overseas Press Club, the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Hong Kong, Thailand or Japan? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wortly45 (talk • contribs) 
:I like this change you made, it makes it much more readable. (Maybe a similar change could be made at Foreign Correspondents' Club, Phnom Penh?) Honestly, when I put this page together I couldn't figure out which ones were "real" journalist clubs and how they related to each other, and which were just using the name. From the information I had available none of them seemed noteworthy enough to have their own articles. If the one is Cambodia is the only one that's really so different, and since it already has itws own article, then we could just link to it in See also section at the bottom. Ewlyahoocom 20:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

message: FCCT - Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand - http://www.fccthai.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.218.174.25 (talk) 13:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  FCCT - Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand - http://www.fccthai.com/
Talk:Rock the Bells

message: Just a note about the lineups...for the August 29th, 2007 Rock the Bells, although David Banner and Erykah Badu were both slated to perform, neither did.  Perhaps there should be a footnote stating this?  And if it happened at the show I went to, I'm sure it happened elsewhere too, with different artists. --AspirinKid 14:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Trionic 8

message: What are the numbers in the article? Are they part numbers or references to a diagram? Biscuittin (talk) 08:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers 

message: I am trying to explain the abbreviations, and I have put a glossary at Trionic#Glossary, but there are some I can't be sure about. Biscuittin (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume that A/C is air-conditioning but what is ACC? Is it Automatic climate control? I don't think it is Active Cylinder Control or Autonomous cruise control system. Biscuittin (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbreviations
Talk:Chalet School

message: DO NOT DELETE THIS ENTRY. This is one of the MOST COLLECTED GIRLS SCHOOL SERIES in English-speaking literature. First editions are expensive but the books have been in print continuously since publication nearly 100 years ago. There is an extensive fan network across many countries and fan-fiction is regularly published by Girls Gone By Publishers. In other words, this is not a "non-notable" school. Unless you intend to delete HOGWARTS, there is no reason at all to delete this entry!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isabellalucia (talk • contribs) 06:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

message: Hello all,
Just giving this page a bit of a cleanup (along with the page for Elinor Brent-Dyer) as they don't meet Wikipedia's quality standards in their current state. Please feel free to contribute.
Cheers, Supervegan (talk) 13:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Comment 

message: Anyone know what this term means? It's not one I can find via Google or Wikipedia. Whatever it means, it needs to be explained or a more common term should be used. 
Geofferic T•C✡ 18:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fill in novels?
Talk:Mad Dogs (novel)

message: It's already out, someone write the summary!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Battyface (talk • contribs) 07:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Continuous variable valve timing

message: Shouldn't this material be merged with variable valve timing?  To the extent that automotive technologies are discussed, there is significant overlap, and that page contains history dating back into the 19th century world of steam engines -- where all the variable valve timing ideas were, in point of fact, continuous.  It seems that only the 20th century introduced discrete variants of this idea.128.255.45.57 (talk) 19:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Suggestion

message: This article basically relies mainly on one source for most of the information.  The information from this article seems good but using more sources would add to the strength of the article.  It would also show that this article is not a shortened mirror image of the main source used.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cx500 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Verifiability

message: What is "hydraulic cam gears" actually ?Eregli bob (talk) 16:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Try variator (variable valve timing)  Andy Dingley (talk) 09:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  " hydraulic cam gears "
Talk:Safety package

message: I propose that Safety package be merged into Trim level (automobile). The reason is that I think it would be easier for the casual reader to understand the context of the Sports package if it is alongside other information about equipment levels in the Trim Level article. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Agreed as it is a trim level and follows the package layout. It should be redirected to the header named 'safety package' though. Waddie96 (talk) 13:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks Waddie. Will do. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 10:08, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:DOT 5

message: What does DOT mean?
2600:1700:4CA1:3C80:244D:82ED:812D:7297 (talk) 00:13, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: US Department of Transportation Andy Dingley (talk) 00:21, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why DOT?
Talk:Christopher Cool

message: I just read all six novels within the last few days. Yummi Toyama is referred to as "Berkeley Two", not "Berklee", and her home city and major are never mentioned, so I assumed she was a student at the University of California at Berkeley, which would also fit in with her Japanese-American ethnicity (lots of Asian-Americans in that area). (Granted, the other agents are all from the New England area, but presumably TEEN has agents nationwide.) She might also be a student of Berkeley College at Yale (which would fit in with the Ivy League affiliations of all the others). What is the basis for the article's claim that she attends Berklee College of Music? Unless someone can defend that claim, I'm going to change it. Craig418 (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yummi Toyama
Talk:Low rolling resistance tire

message: Why the hyphen in the title? Shouldn't it be Low rolling resistance tire? It's not the resistance that's "low-rolling", the "low" qualifies the "rolling resistance", – ukexpat (talk) 14:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, also: WP:PLURAL. In the linked documents, the hyphen-less spelling is most common, followed by the one currently in place.  I would also like "low-rolling-resistance tire", but that one seems to be rare, and I'm not a native speaker. -- Theoprakt (talk) 05:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Conrad's Fate

message: Why are all of the pages for Diana Wynne Jones' books so horrible? Nearly all of the plot summaries end halfway through, one of them is straight from the back of the book, character lists are incomplete, useless information is being added, and in general they are unhelpful. These are great books by a renowned author; they deserve good pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.200.52 (talk) 01:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rustproofing

message: This article needs cites.Wikipedia:Verifiability says "Material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source."This article has been tagged "This article does not cite any references or sources.... Unsourced material may be challenged and removed" since September 2007.That's plenty of time. -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs cites

message: An expert who can supply references to WP:RS is badly needed. To avoid overlaps with more general coverage in the article Corrosion, I have made it more explicit that this article is focused on road vehicles. Nevertheless, the article here should cover trucks, vans, and other road vehicles, which have problems and constraints very similar to passenger cars. In addition to a general improvement, the history of rustproofing methods needs expansion, as  well as coverage of rust treatments worldwide.  Reify-tech (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements needed
Talk:Knight engine

message: In the following sentence, there is an orphan quotation mark, thus:
On the project's completion, though it was no longer "Wholly Knight, Knight obtained a British patent for his modified engine on June 6 1908.
I'm not sure whether the intention is "Wholly" Knight or "Wholly Knight".
Dawright12 (talk) 09:57, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Daimler-Knight

message: Andy Dingley. I can't refind the source of the statement that these logos/emblems - more than mere mascots - were required by C Y Knight so for the moment I will take it all away. Knight's demands varied a bit as he felt his bargaining strength wax and wane. I found the reference some months ago and was then unable to re-find the illustration which I knew existed. I found the image in Wikimedia 24 hours ago and used it as you have noticed. 
Important this: here is the owner of the emblem concerned, he discusses it beginning 1:50 seconds into the video regards, Eddaido (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  trademark discussion 

message: Should this article be in British English (where the engine was developed) or in US English? Eddaido (talk) 01:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Renix

message: I have reduced the importance rating to mid as this better aligns with the definitions ie "more specific" rather than "general" knowledge. Malcolma 10:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: Article doesn't mention that the Renault Encore/AMC Alliance had a Renix system in 1984.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.94.85 (talk) 07:10, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an opportunity to contribute and improve this article! Yes, the AMC/Renault Alliance and Encore passenger cars were among the first with an automatic transmission that was electronically controlled ... and these were made by Renix! CZmarlin (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Renault Alliance
Talk:Blue&Me

message: Can I install any application designed for windows CE or Windows Mobile on the device?
Can I use an SDK from other OS than Windows?
Can I install a different version of the OS, or a completely different OS on the hardware?
Is Blue&Me hardware/software optional? Can I choose not to buy the software or the hardware of it? (Just like buying a computer without windows preinstalled and save money)
Is there an API for other software to use the data?
What kind of data is available? syntax and format, is it perhaps OBD-II? Benkeboy (talk) 13:24, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 
Talk:Instant center

message: See discussion here: Talk:Roll center#Merger Proposal. --VanBurenen (talk) 20:28, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, roll centres, and 4 bar links, are a practical example. Which is pretty much where we came in? Greg Locock (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Blind spot monitor

message: The video "2009 Ford Blind Spot Monitoring System" was pulled from YouTube with the message "The YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement."
Accordingly, I've commented it out of the External links section rather than deleting it, in the hope that someone who recalls the old video can determine whether my new replacement is suitable or not.
--Eliyahu S Talk 13:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulled YouTube video 

message: The information on adjusting mirrors has nothing to do with the History section or the history of blind spot monitoring systems. It should be removed. It could be added to a separate section that lists alternatives to automated systems, but should be rewritten in a balanced way. It currently indicates that such an adjustment is the "correct" way of adjusting mirrors, while that's not universally agreed upon nor advocated by various state DMV manuals that represent information from states on proper adjustment. It also fails to mention that it's a trade off with being able to see further down adjacent lanes, which may not be visible through the rear view mirror when another vehicle is following closely 2602:306:80AB:60D0:0:0:0:28 (talk) 23:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It's amazing it's still there seven years later. It's basically one person's rant about adjusting wing mirrors. 51.9.46.62 (talk) 23:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternatives 
Talk:List of places in Leeds

message: Does this page do anything which the :Category:Districts of Leeds doesn't do? PamD 14:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Think we should delete this page as it is not necessary as far as I can see the category will do. Keith D 11:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A possible use for the page would be if a map is put on the page with the areas marked and numbered. The number could then be attached to the entries in the list. Keith D 15:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Districts of Leeds

message: See discussion at Talk:Leeds.  I have added all the article names from the category "Leeds environs" to the previous "Areas of Leeds" to create a first unified listing of "Places in Leeds".  It needs more work when we have agreed what to do with it. PamD (talk) 16:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving forward 

message: I think that the entry for Hyde Park should say that part of the area is in the Headingley ward.  I know that the boundary between these areas is very vague, but some landmarks commonly considered Hyde Park (such as the Hyde Park Picturehouse and the Brudenell Social Club) are in the Headingley ward.  Epa101 (talk) 10:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyde Park/Headingley 
Talk:Parking sensor

message: I've heard about parking sensors using an "Electromagnetic" field (not sure if they mean electric or magnetic, should be magnetic, I guess), shouldn't they be in this article? 
Jonatan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.237.227.205 (talk) 08:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Electromagnetic" devices 

message: In the article it states, "After patenting the device in 1983 Heyes offered it to Jaguar Cars in Coventry. After test driving the prototype on Heyes's car they very politely told him that, 'You like it because you are a one eyed driver who cannot judge distances. Real people would not want a thing like this.'"
Well Jaguar were absolutely right. Real people do not want a thing like this. Nor do they want reversing cameras. Nor do they want things that go beep beep beep when they reverse.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.114.44.178 (talk) 13:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beeping whilst reversing 

message: I've removed all this content . We need some reliable, independent sources for this material. As was, all we had was claims added by user:Heyes tony who apparently is Tony Heyse, sourced to nothing but his personal webpage.  There are sites out there that repeat these claims, but they may well be based on  Wikipedia or the personal website. Meters (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tony Heyse and his  ReverseAid 

message: Parking sensors not working 41.13.24.119 (talk) 14:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parking sensors not working
Talk:Doctor Dolittle's Caravan

message: Hello. I have been working to verify what year this book was first published.
The Library of Congress online database/catalog shows [1926] as the publication date. However, the OCLC shows [1924] and [1926] for Doctor Dolittle's Caravan. To make matters even more unclear, I own an edition, one book in a six-book boxed set, published in 1967 as a tie-in to the 20th Century Fox Film Corp.'s motion picture starring Rex Harrison; and its copyright dates confuse the issue even more.
From its copyright page:
----
Copyright, 1924, 1925, 1926, by Hugh Lofting
Copyright, 1954, by Josephine Lofting
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 26-18089
----
26-18089 would seem to imply that it was published in 1926. A search at http://catalog2.loc.gov/ for [26018089] results in only one book: http://lccn.loc.gov/26018089. However, this web site also has a disclaimer that states:
"Please note: The Library of Congress does not keep a copy of every title ever published."
Any assistance in verifying the publication date for this book will be appreciated, since I do not know where else to search for copyright dates.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Jensenr629 (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need assistance in verifying publication date for this book: 1924 or 1926?
Talk:Isofix

message: Shouldn't it be called "ISOFIX" instead of "Isofix"? http://www.iso.org/iso/search.htm?qt=isofix&searchSubmit=Search&sort=rel&type=simple&published=on seems to agree with me. 193.203.85.98 (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case? 

message: ISOFIX cannot stand for "International Standards Organization FIX"  because the organization is actually called International Organization for Standardization.
ISO comes from "equal", and is NOT an abbreviation of the name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.73.148.200 (talk) 23:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're partially correct. The International Standards Organization uses the prefix "ISO" in numbering its standards publications and is very well known as "the ISO"; but the name "ISOFIX" is the acronym "ISO" and the word "fix" formed into a single word. (Logically, if it were an abbreviation, it would be the acronym "IF".) --Rfsmit (talk) 22:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISOFIX 

message: ISOFix and Latch aren't compatible, they're designed to different standards. I'm a little worried that the first paragraph implies that they are interchangable. I may find a reference and clarify it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.86.68.140 (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ISOFIX and LATCH aren't "designed to different standards" -- they are in and of themselves different standards. This, however, does not mean the practical implementation of each is different; indeed, the two standards appear to have been defined explicitly in order that a single set of anchorage points may be placed within a vehicle to satisfy both standards' requirements.--Rfsmit (talk) 22:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISOFix/LATCH 

message: The 2002 Chevrolet-Geo Prizm Owners Manual defines "LATCH" as "Low Anchorages and Top Tethers for Children". Should this be listed as an alternative, or should it be noted that the definition is unclear? ISOFIX, upon which LATCH has come to be based (but notably, was not originally based), only defines the lower anchorages; the top tethers being an additional part.--Rfsmit (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  LATCH 

message: The articel claims
The full set of anchor points for this system were required in new cars in the United States starting in September 2002.
and
Under the current UN/ECE R14, all new vehicles produced since February 2013 are required to have ISOFIX lower anchorages and top tether attachments.
This is a contradiction. What is true, now, and what holds sway in which country? Very confusing article structure. It is unclear what applies to the US, what to EMEA, and what all over the globe. Adacus12 (talk) 11:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DATES
Talk:Chem-E-Car

message: Don't think the only school that should be mentioned should be The University of Akron...Many colleges work on this.
Pfkninenines 16:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

message: There is nowhere in the rules that says there can not be any exhaust, only that there can not be flames or smoke. For example, cold gas thrusters or even a decomposition reaction such has hydrogen peroxide could be used. 174.97.175.88 (talk) 00:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No exhaust requirement