Talk:Klaipėda Revolt

message: See also Memelland or Territoire de Memel as in the Treaty of Versailles. --Matthead 20:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please feel free to improve the article, or be a little more detailed than that. Thanks, heqs 15:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  What a great lie is this article. There was nothing like revolt. Simply lithunian aarmy was redressed as civilians. Now even lithunian historians admits it was occupation of Klaipėda/Memel territory. It's ridiculous use as references books, that were published in Soviet Lithuania in 1945-1990, historian R. Žiugžda - was famous for stalinistic style dogmas.--Tarakonas 14:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memelland 

message: This content belongs into the Memelland article, it a major part of the history there. It is suffering from too much Lithuanian POV, but this will be straigthened out by facts.--Matthead 02:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose merger. The revolt is a significant event on it's own. Renata 03:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose merger M.K. 18:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose merger. Don't see the alleged "too much Lithuanian POV". Please explain. --Lysytalk 23:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose completely heqs 18:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: There was no rebellion at all. See  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vulpes vulpes (talk • contribs)  
:Well, there was a revolt, but it was mainly carried out by forces from outside, rather than from within the Memel territory. -- Matthead discuß!     O       20:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If regular army from outside is redressed as rebellions and if rebellion is carried out by forces from outside, this don't makes a "rebellion" real rebellion. --Vulpes vulpes 10:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth 

message: This is definitelly one of the most biased articles I have read in Wikipedia. I am really shocked.
And this one is the best: On January 19, the directory of Klaipėda region asked for admission into Lithuania as an autonomous territory (where the Klaipėda region would have a separate parliament and government, two official languages, be the administrator of taxes, duties, cultural and religious affairs, would oversee the local judicial system, agriculture and forestry, and social security). Lithuania accepted this, and thus the Klaipėda Region became an autonomous part of Lithuania. When I have read this? I remember, an Soviet encyclopedy about "admission" of Lithuania into Soviet Union in 1940. 
This article definitelly is a shame... 79.64.179.71 21:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  biased articles 

message: Lithuanian propaganda! -- 217.255.216.86 (talk) 08:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Occupation not Revolt

message: Renata3 liked to remove this:
Result   
"The at that time popular arguments about the "revolt" of Memellanders are still reiterated today as if Lithuanian achievements after 1990 are still not yet available and as if no conferences occurred between Lithuanian and German historians.   
   
In 1965 the former leaders of the "revolt" were the opinion to keep furthermore the secret about the real details because Lithuania could be compromised in admitting the scandal of the fraud and conspiracy." 
Source:
Vygantas Vareikis, Ein zählebiger Mythos oder wer hat das Memelgebiet befreit?, p.195 in "
The past is past, Lithuanian archives are open and European historians talk with each other again! So we do not need more propaganda of the past, and certainly not in the wikipedia. Kaubri (talk) 16:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No POV

message: I'm Viktoras Gailius' only living descendant, carrying his exact name! Check with me, fellas, if you need photos and history, perhaps.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.127.139.185 (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I hold Viktor Gailius' entire photo journal, as the war broke out. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Klaipėda Revolt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.siaure.lt/article/articlearchiveview/255/2010/05/17
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722151929/http://www6.lrs.lt/kronikos/pdf/m_123.pdf to http://www6.lrs.lt/kronikos/pdf/m_123.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.muziejai.lt/prev_vers/Vilnius/kazukausko_str.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lzinios.lt/lt/2009-01-16/istorija/klaipedos_sukilimas_faktai_ir_versijos.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mazoji-lietuva.lt/article.php?article=2243
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722152412/http://www.ku.lt/leidykla/leidiniai/AHUK/AHUK_XVII.pdf to http://www.ku.lt/leidykla/leidiniai/AHUK/AHUK_XVII.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lrytas.lt/print.asp?data=&k=news&id=12359180741234791921
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion