lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Revised Julian calendar

message: The "Arithmetic" section contains differences between the Gregorian and Revised Julian calendars long before it was first proposed about 1920. We know there are standards that support the use of the Gregorian calendar before it was first implemented in 1583, for example, ISO 8601. I an not aware of anyone making any use of the Revised Julian calendar before it was formulated. So in what year should this table of date differences begin? Jc3s5h (talk) 15:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: "Arithmetic" section

message: The defense section of this article is basically the opinion of whoever authored it. 
"(3) Some Orthodox themselves may unwittingly reinforce this impression by ignorance of their own faith and by a consequential exclusive, or excessive, focus on the calendar issue: it has been observed, anecdotally, that some Russians cannot cite any difference in belief or practice between their faith and the faith of western Christians, except for the 13-day calendar difference."
I would argue that it would be better to cite sources instead of mentioning some random anecdotal (patronizing) comment about Russians. 2A02:A445:6431:1:2554:7760:424E:FBEF (talk) 14:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, I removed the unsourced part. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Defense" section 

message: Which calendar does the church use now?
And are we talking about Orthodox of Catholics?
Ladnerg310 (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about Poland 

message: Which is more accurate after a cycle of 6300 years? --Roland (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on how much the rotation of the Earth slows down, which is not completely predictable. Nobody can be sure which will turn out to be more accurate. See ΔT (timekeeping) for details. Jc3s5h (talk) 17:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy: Revised Julian calendar vs. [[Gregorian calendar]]
Talk:Tor Books

message: The article has been tagged as needing updating since 2008. I will try to post specific suggestions for changes here. --Pleasantville (talk) 11:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the long list of authors published by Tor is not particularly useful, and could be cut or eliminated.  I would like to see more history of the evolution of the company, though the sourcing is going to be a bit difficult -- I imagine most of it could be found in old issues of Locus, but that would be quite a research project.  Mike Christie (talk) 11:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs updating

message: Is the list of editors, which is unreferenced, appropriate for an encyclopedia article?  RJFJR (talk) 00:55, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editors?
Talk:Situation awareness

message: I believe I can expand more about the impacts of situation awareness on pilots. I can write about the effects of cockpit environment and other external and internal environmental factors. 
* Effects of Modes of Cockpit Automation (PDF file)
* Analysis of situation awareness for cockpit display Hhur2 (talk) 03:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is interesting that the research PDF mentions luck as being a factor. Damotclese (talk) 16:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Interesting that Wei et al (2013) chose to measure SA directly using SAGAT and heart-rate, while Guk-Ho et al 2012 used only indirect methods - Modified Cooper-Harper, heart-rate and trail success/failure. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing more details on relationship between situational awareness and pilot error 

message: With a number of editors providing improvements, the extant article is no longer STUB class, I think it warrants B now. Also importance from Low to Mid seems to be appropriate. Damotclese (talk) 16:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer stub class 

message: The Amtrak derailment was caused by a loss of situational awareness and a lack of Positive Train Control, as Covered In This Article which would be a suitable reference or segment in its own right. TrainsOnTime (talk) 22:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I saw your note on PTC. Damotclese (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another suitable reference 

message: The recent addition of "National Information Sharing Consortium" appears to be blatant promotion. It needs to be re-worded.  Damotclese (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotion -- National Information Sharing Consortium 

message: Looking at the history of this page it looks like there is a lot of attempts to spam / Blatant Promotion  this page. Thank you for removing the spam link to the thepreppingguide web site. SoftwareThing (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you for removing BP spam
Talk:Lima

message: Citation requested for assertion in "etymology" that early Spanish articles (should this read chronicles?) called the area "Itchyma". No independent sources found to confirm this statement. Can anyone provide details to substantiate this statement? BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Itchyma 

message: It is rather typical of the biased Western approach - and anglo-saxon in particular - that all the religious buildings are presented under the section 'Tourism', that is : places to be visited. Please do remember and keep in mind that those churches, convents and monasteries are first of all places of worship and of other religious activities of the Christians of Lima and Peru. In this long article there is not even a section 'Religion'  but under the section 'Tourism', the large majority of touristic places are in fact religious buildings. This bias is plaguing  quite a few similar articles.--Zerged (talk) 04:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  What ignorant racist nonsense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.21.126 (talk) 13:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

text: This Westerner agrees with you that the absence of a religion section is surprising. You could begin to create one yourself. HiLo48 (talk) 04:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourism or Religion?
Talk:1948 Atlantic hurricane season

message: It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: I'm working to get this article up to GA or FA standards. I've inserted sources, and the prose has been refreshened. I've added a seasonal summary; thus far, I've expanded five of the nine storms. The introduction has been lengthened, too. I hope I have made some good progress. What do you think? If anyone wants to offer some suggestions, you may post them on my talk page. This article is located in my sandbox, too. CapeVerdeWave (talk) 12:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's looking good. One quick thing I noticed is you cited Unisys. While that's not really a problem, I think it'd be better to either get the info from the MWR, or much more simply cite Hurdat. Also, Tropical Storm Four needs a source for the second paragraph. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 
Talk:Genetic fallacy

message: Can't we use examples that don't rely on false origins? There's no plausible evidence that wedding rings originated as symbols of ankle chains. This example is likely to confuse the reader as to the true nature of the fallacy.--IfYouDoIfYouDon't (talk) 12:49, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We have discussed this example before. I think there is a consensus that this isn't a good example. And, yes, it is nonsense to say wedding rings originated as ankle chains. We need a better example. Unfortunately, I think the problem is the genetic fallacy is a fallacy.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that the supposed origin story of the symbol may not be true is utterly irrelevant. The problem lies in assuming that something's origin has a necessary bearing of any kind on its current state or meaning. Any argument that depends on this is fallacious. Even in cases where the attribute in question can be said to still be present, it is not present simply because of its origin, though it may very well be present as a result of its origin. 173.68.165.114 (talk) 13:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wedding ring example is problematic
Talk:Brilliant Light Power

message: Brilliant Light Power and/or Randall Mills hold several patents related to energy generating systems according to a search on Google patents search page .
Given the prominence shown in the article to a patent that was granted and then withdrawn, presumably active patents are of as much interest and should be listed or at least summarized and referenced. Nxn (talk) 08:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you got any sources discussing those patents? - Roxy the dog  09:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patents 

message: The following paragraph under the Criticism section doesn't match up with the surrounding text in a way that makes sense: 
"A hydrino laser patent and a hydrino energy patent have not been withdrawn by the USPTO.US 7773656US 10443139" 
Are these patents related to the one that was retracted or the following criticisms in the article? I would make an edit request, but I don't know if this should be worked in somewhere, added later as a footnote, or removed outright. Reconrabbit (talk) 22:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Xxanthippe I don't see a place for the reverted information in this article. I agree that it may be relevant information, but unless there's related information that contextualizes it somewhere in the article that I missed, it is just confusing. Reconrabbit (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement of non-retracted patents
Talk:High card by suit

message: The original article made it seem like alphabetical order was the main convention, which really is not the case.  As this page is the first hit in google when you search for "Poker High Card By Suit" (!), I thought that there should be a little more information on other conventions.  Also, I read somewhere that this suit order is different in other countries.  Can anyone confirm/deny?  Thanks -DropDeadGorgias 15:22 30 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:I copied the preceding remarks from DropDeadGorgias from the discussion page for High card by suit when I merged that article into this one. Pat Berry 23:46, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't get the (poker) in the blind link gone! The preview does it, but it won't go away! Some software glitch, I guess. Revolver 07:39, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: I'll just leave this here:
https://www.i-p-c-s.org/faq/suit-ranking.php
[There are] different ways that the suits are ranked in different games. Here are a few off the top of my head (rank from high to low in each case):
* hearts, diamonds, clubs, spades: Preference, 500, Tysiacha
* clubs, spades, hearts, diamonds: Skat, Doppelkopf, Sheepshead
* spades, hearts, clubs, diamonds: Big Two (Choi Dai Di, Da Lao Er)
* diamonds, hearts, spades, clubs: Pusoy Dos
* clubs, hearts, spades, diamonds: Ninety-nine
* spades, hearts, diamonds, clubs: Contract Bridge
https://www.pagat.com/poker/rules/ranking.html
Although the order spades, hearts, diamonds, clubs may seem natural to Bridge players and English speakers, other suit orders are common, especially in some European countries. Up to now, I have come across:
* spades (high), hearts, clubs, diamonds (low)
* spades (high), diamonds, clubs, hearts (low)
* hearts (high), spades, diamonds, clubs (low) (in Greece and in Turkey)
* hearts (high), diamonds, spades, clubs (low) (in Austria and in Sweden)
* hearts (high), diamonds, clubs, spades (low) (in Italy)
* diamonds (high), spades, hearts, clubs (low) (in Brazil)
* diamonds (high), hearts, spades, clubs (low) (in Brazil)
* clubs (high), spades, hearts, diamonds (low) (in Germany)
DAVilla (talk) 15:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entire article is bogus
Talk:Zoophilia/Archive 13

message: While there is an ongoing VfD discussion, however frivolous the original call, I think it's best that we have the VfD notice displayed.  My reasoning is that people seeing the article should be aware of the attempt to delete it and the response of the Wikipedia community (which happens to be unanimous rejection of the deletion call).  Please do not remove the notice again--it will be removed in a few days time when the discussion is archived. This is not a fresh VfD call and it is not a vote of support for Ciz.--Tony Sidaway|Talk 02:53, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD notice

message: Arg, another vprotection? I can only hope this one doesn't last several weeks like the last one did. Zetawoof 02:23, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the protection, but the constant wave of vandalism coming from we-know-who more or less made it necessary. :/ But yeah, as JAQ pointed out, the Arbitration commitee is considering a temporary injuction against Ciz that would forbid him to edit any pages except for his own user and user talk pages; if that goes through, the protection can hopefully be lifted again very soon. -- Schneelocke (cheeks clone)  05:10, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Like this? Zetawoof 22:18, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: What was the vandalism this time? Adding the NPOV? --Ciz 23:20, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: vprot 17 Dec 04
Talk:Accessory nerve

message: I rewrote the article from the stance that accessory nerve has only a spinal component, but didn't want to eliminate the mention of the cranial component altogether. The result is a bit of a mish-mash as I didn't separate out the various classification schemes as clearly as I perhaps could have. I'll be doing another reorganization so that the article speaks only of the spinal accessory nerve, with a section devoted to the traditional description and a note on how that description has been shown to be erroneous. --David Iberri (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:1980 in film

message: Seems to me that putting "the late" Christopher Reeve is inappropriate here.  He was very much alive (and healthy) in 1980.  If he had died in 1980 and the movie was then released, then the comment would be appropriate. Schmiteye 00:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the late" Christopher Reeve 

message: Please help me find a copy or dvd of this film. It was first aired in 1980 and its a true story about Dwight escaping prison dressed as a woman.
Please please help
Debbie  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.136.40.39 (talk) 15:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  help film "escape" starring timothy bottoms true story about dwight worker
Talk:WAYL

message: Does FCC assign the FM suffix to this station?? Please note that according to Radiojon, the following convention should be used:
*W&&&-FM means FCC assigns the FM suffix
*W&&& (FM) means FCC does not officially assign it
*W&&& (with no FM/AM/TV suffix) should be either a dis-ambiguation page (if more than one station with the callsign exists) or a re-direct (if only one exists.) Georgia guy 00:08, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Details on the naming conventions used on Wikipedia are available at the WP:WPRS link above.--Rtphokie (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Callsign question
Talk:George B. Cortelyou

message: My family tells me he was once married to my great aunt Rosalie Myers. Once looking into it I discovered he was once Chairman of the Republican Party and more recently read this:
The U.S. National Archives published an article on "White House Press Secretaries" and stated that because of the assassination of President McKinley (at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, NY [1901] where Mr. Cortelyou is seen in a photo standing next to the President here online) the press was invited into the White House where Mr. Cortelyou spoke to them. Oddly, when the article was written Ms. Dee Dee Myers was in service in that capacity, but was not within the article referred to, though she served in that capacity for three years, I think. Other men that followed Cortelyou were. I am also under the impression that historians consider George Bruce MacDonald Cortelyou, overlooked in American History and his papers should be reviewed and reported about, such an important chapter in history, the Spanish-American War, the beginnings of conservation, included. I wonder if many of his records are in shorthand, which he taught in school in New York City. He is listed as living at 4 Irving Place where he was an early CEO of Con Edison in NYC, near Elihu Root's surviving landmark place (former Secretary of War) also on Irving Place. The Con Edison Museum, around the corner on 14th Street, has him listed among it's many executives with names posted on an exhibit wall.
And: "...live in the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Washington, D.C. "Victorian Homes" magazine recently featured their home as a "living museum" and "A trip back in time." Built in 1901, the three-story, red brick Victorian mansion once belonged to George Bruce Cortelyou, ("...married to Lilly Hinds" - Daniel W. Mattausch) who held various positions in the administrations of Presidents McKinley and Teddy Roosevelt. Nancy works for the Navy Program Office in Crystal City, Virginia. Dan has a master's degree and doctorate in American government and spends most of his energies researching the history and lost technological knowledge connected with gas lighting." 
http://www.spu.edu/depts/uc/response/Sum97/fn/news.html
George B. Cortelyou also later lived at the "Harbor Lights" estate in Huntington, NY, where he was a member of the Huntington Yacht Club. He is listed in the local history section of the newspaper "Newsday" with Harry Chapin, as the other former famous resident of Huntington, Long Island, NY.
Some other resources:
Further: Picture at "Find A Grave Cemetery Records" http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=6850514&pt=George%20Cortelyou
http://www.findagrave.com/php/famous.php?page=cem&FScemeteryid=641128
Lewis Gould's The Modern American Presidency is a good account of Courtelyou's time as presidential assistant. Thepedestrian 01:15, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Real estate investment trust

message: “ Retail REIT Taubman Centers Inc. launched the modern era of REITs” sounds like a promotion. Modern, according to whom? What’s the definition of modern? Do UPREITs represent the majority of modern REITs globally? 99.72.240.254 (talk) 22:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporate promotion 

message: This needs to be updated to include prisons. Geo Group is classified as a REIT. Insane but true. 2600:1008:A024:96E:91F5:D296:3226:7351 (talk) 08:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  REIT’s 

message: — Assignment last updated by Zefeng jing (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu
Talk:John Melendez

message: John is a loser  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.234.168 (talk) 03:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't understand this quote from Howard Stern: "He calls me 'Stern,' and I'm not sure what that's about." The context is supposed to be Stern accusing Carolla of attempting "to get Melendez riled up." How is this in any way riling up Melendez? And why would Howard Stern have a problem with Adam Carolla calling Howard Stern by his name? I understand this is a quote from another article, but this confuses me. Is it that Carolla is not using his full name? Should Carolla be referring to him as "Howard Stern"? "Mr. Stern"? "Mr. Howard Stern"? "Howard"? What is the problem here? I would understand if Carolla were calling him "Howie" or "Stein" or some other butchering of his name to get a rise out of him, but "Stern" IS his name. Was Carolla using Stern as a pun or double entendre? Was Carolla saying it in a mocking tone or with an affected emphasis or accent? I can't see how using someone's last name should be held against Carolla. Is it disrespectful in some way I am not seeing? I could see how Carolla being overly familiar and calling him "Howard" could be perceived as rude, especially if they didn't know each other personally, though still not a mortal sin. Referring to someone by last name is standard practice in all forms of media, so I don't get the issue. Even if it were indecorous or untoward by some metric, I still wouldn't understand how it would constitute a riling up of Melendez.66.91.36.8 (talk) 09:49, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stern-Carolla Feud 

message: In 2022 Stuttering John started a cancer charity scam.  He took donations to his personal bank account without setting up an official charity in the state of California (this is illegal).  IRS should be investigating this.
https://rumble.com/v1imi2m-saint-stuttering-johns-cancer-scam-nightwave-clip.html Axeman32 (talk) 18:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The link you provided is not to a reliable source. Schazjmd (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 February 2023 

message: As per this request , I have indefinitely protected this article. If, in the future, protection is no longer necessary, please request it be lifted by following the instructions at WP:RFUP. Chetsford (talk) 07:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indefinite semi-protection
Talk:Samba configuration

message: from VfD:
(if deleted, should also delete the redirects smb.conf and Samba Configuration)
Without wanting to open the old debate about how-tos, this article basically consists of an example configuration file, and a note that the Samba website has better documentation. I see we leave it to them to document their config file, and stick to being an encyclopedia. - IMSoP 02:21, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Bonnaroo Music Festival

message: I think there should be a portion about the controversy of Bonnaroo.  Apparently there is some controversy about the scope of corporate sponsorship and the stylistic difference of the current performers as opposed to the first few lineups.  It would be more of a section contrasting the old from new and the pros and cons of the changes.  I can't really add any more input on the subject because I don't fully now the topic--which is why someone needs to write this!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.153.135.123 (talk) 05:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: This pertains to the Bonnaroo Music Festivals by year articles (the ones that are "20xx Bonnaroo Music Festival")... I've posted it here for visibility. Help me redirect the discussion if necessary. These articles don't follow the same format. They're disorganized and lengthy. I feel they are not useful from an encyclopedic perspective. I propose we list the bands/artists by notability (headliners first) and remove the date and stage distinctions. We should also remove the list of films shown in the cinema tent. I think we should add the Bonnaroo font and theme as a headline image to each article. - Rantankamus (talk) 19:32, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bonnaroo Music Festivals by Year" articles - reorganization 

message: — Assignment last updated by Other Friend, Different Hat (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Disability Rhetorics
Talk:Battle of New Orleans (song)

message: Raise all the ruckus about Johnny Horton's lyrics you want, but Jimmy Driftwood's are almost certainly public domain. *shrug* --Chris Lawson 03:13, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: I have attempted to merge the content from this page into The Battle of New Orleans. Feel free to review this history to see if I missed any valid content which need be on the page. GassyGuy 04:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge/Redirect