Talk:Baháʼí views on science

message: Following up on the merge discussion at Talk:Baháʼí teachings#Another merger proposal, there were some ideas on changing the name of this page:
*Baháʼí views on science
*Science in the Baháʼí Faith
*Baháʼí Faith and science (current title)
There are a few other examples of similar pages:
*Buddhism and science
*Islamic attitudes towards science
*Christianity and science
*Mormon views on evolution
*Science and the Catholic Church
The goal was to distinguish that the article is primarily the Baha'i views on scientific issues, and not scientific views on the Baha'i Faith (which largely don't exist). I think any of the titles are fine and get the point across (including current title). I tend to like shorter, natural titles, so I'll vote for the "Baha'i views on science". If we get a consensus I'll put in a requested move. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 16:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 03:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Baháʼí Faith and science →  – See discussion at Talk:Baháʼí Faith and science#Title change. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 21:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging previous participants: Cuñado, Gazelle55. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

text: , I tried but got an error. The instructions led me to technical move in that case. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 23:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Cuñado: Hm; I can't figure out why — you're extended confirmed, and neither the page nor the destination title is protected. I'll take a look. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 April 2022 

message: Removing this since it currently no makes no mention of the Baha'i Faith and needs to be connected to the article topic. I can see tweaking a bit but the article *is* about the scholarship in Baha'i studies on this issue, and that includes the views on the paralysis or unsatisfactory condition the wider case has gotten into as commented on in scholarship in Baha'i studies so this is clearly appropriate content and is very well sourced. It belongs at least in some form. Smkolins (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thinking about this more, I think you're right that this could be included with some tweaking, though I think the heading "Science vs religion" should probably be changed. Gazelle55 (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm always open to considering better wording but it's clear there is a strained relationship between the disciplines of religion and science, however that should be framed in language and used in the sources. Smkolins (talk) 16:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  How about "Commentary from Baha'i studies"? Since we want to make clear why this material is in this article rather than just at Relationship between religion and science. Gazelle55 (talk) 19:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scholarship in Baha'i studies on the analysis of and relationship with the broader issues/situation/history of the topic

message: Hi , I've moved a version from my sandbox to the mainspace. I know we have some issues still under discussion so I'm open to making further changes. But I figured it was better to get the material we agree on visible and then perhaps later add some that I removed if that's what we decide based on discussing. Gazelle55 (talk) 21:28, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved the draft in my sandbox to the mainspace