lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1906 Russian legislative election

message: There is:
Session
The State Duma (and the State Council - the upper house) convened for the first time on April 27, 1906. On May 10, Sergey Muromtsev, a Law Professor at the Saint Petersburg University, was elected President of the Duma. 
I think it's the same date:
Thursday the 27th of April 1906 Julian date (OS) = Thursday the 10th of May 1906 Gregorian date (NS) 
Wdew (talk) 12:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The election results appear to be entirely unsourced. I can't find where they got the results from. The Russian page of the article also displays different results. For example, the English article claims the Kadets won 179/478 seats, whilst the top of the Russian page claims they won 176, but scroll down to the results section and they won 161. Meanwhile, in 'Revolutionary Russia', Orlando Figes, claims (without reference) that the Kadets received 153/448 seats.
So that's 4 different results, all of which don't appear to have a direct source, so it seems impossible to tell where these figures came from or their veracity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emis98 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of sources?
Talk:1995 Russian legislative election

message: The Communist Party was represented on this page as controlling, with the help of its allies, more than half of the Duma.  I just edited this to say it was actually less.  This is true by both the post election seat count (Bloc for USSR [1] + Communists [157] + Agrarians [20] + Power To The People [9] + Pamfilov Bloc [2] + Ribkin Bloc [3] = 192), and the Second Duma seat table (Communists [139] + Power To The People [41] + Agrarian [35] = 215).  There are 450 seats, so in each case, that is less than a majority of seats.  Perhaps in individual votes the Communists and their allies could prevail because other parties assisted them, but if I have the right parties as the Communists and allies parties, then in neither case did they control a majority of seats.  Someone please correct me if I am wrong about this, but it appears this is the proper description.  Zachary Klaas (talk) 15:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Larapinta Trail

message: "The trail is very well marked with kilometre posts (though often inaccurate)" 
 
What does that ("inaccurate") mean?
- This seems to contradict the "very well (marked)", and is therefore confusing. 
(Or) Is this ("inaccurate") just the opinion/ notion of 'nerds' who complain already if/when the post isn't on the exact mm/cm/metre, (or the totally exact satellite-coordinates, or something like that,) which would not trouble "normal" people at all?  
 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3033:212:1F5A:6515:A1D9:D452:B11F (talk) 09:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  in 'Anemities' 

message: Another confusing thing: Water is to be boiled OR treated with tablets, but no fires are allowed - how can people boil anything without either electricity or fire? 
 
Does that mean in reality water has to be, exclusively, treated chemically, as boiling is impossible, or does it mean that campfires on the ground are forbidden, but flames of small (e.g. gas- or alcohol-fuelled) "camping stoves"/burners are allowed?
 
Maybe someone could write this a little clearer (for the general audience - maybe people who hike such trails a lot do know without more clarification, but not every Wikipedia reader is such an expert in that field but interested anyhow)? 
 
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3033:212:1F5A:6515:A1D9:D452:B11F (talk) 10:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "boil water" <> "no fires"?
Talk:Ilary Blasi

message: "Passaparola" doesn't mean "password" but "word of mouth". In Italian we don't translate the word "password", we use the English one. Mattia.longhin (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Terra Bite Lounge

message: There are at least three secondary sources cited, including one from the Seattle newspaper of record (The Seattle Times) and one from the only regular Kirkland newspaper; therefore this article passes the prima facie notability test "The "secondary sources" in the criterion include reliable published works in all forms, such as (for examples) newspaper articles...".  --Brianhe 23:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: It might be noted that shortly before they switched out of the voluntary payment system, at least for a short time, they weren't letting minors in because they were "damaging property" (the xbox for free play) and weren't paying enough. Source: personal disappointing experience.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.219.200 (talk) 09:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Age Requirement?

message: According to Yelp, Terra Bite is closed. It would be good to add this to the article, but I can't find a reliable source. Leschnei (talk) 01:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now closed
Talk:Rolland Lawrence

message: Bay Lawrence was the Athletic Director at the Franklin YMCA during the 1980's. I vividly remember him being around. I also think that he was one of my soccer coaches in 1984. Cjstanonis (talk) 14:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bay Lawrence was athletic director at the Franklin YMCA during the 1980's 

message: Rolland Lawrence during the mid 1980s was also employed in Franklin Pennsylvania by Vision Quest a program for troubled youth. Robert7311 (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employment
Talk:Adrian Andrei Rusu

message: I don't think that what was written was non-sense. It's very little but I think it's completely understandable. As well, on Wikipedia (including in the Romanian Wikipedia) there is a distinct lack of pages relating to important Romanian archaeologists. Adrian Rusu is currently a key researcher in mediaeval archaeology in Romania (a very under-developed field of study there), as well as being director of the excavations at Bizere Monastery (an important archaeological site in the region). I think these points merit leaving the page there, at least as a stub. The information is factual and better than nothing at all. --O crandell 23:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Humble Petition and Advice

message: www.british-civil-wars.co.uk looks like the likley source of much of this information. WinstonBerni 23:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed a paragraph copied into this article from a restricted incompatible licence, see "Revision as of 21:44, 8 January 2008".
This is because Wikipedia Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License allows commercial distribution, but the current licence used by the British Civil War website is Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which places a restriction "Non-Commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes." which the Wikipedia license does not.
Providing the requirements of the Terms of Use and WP:plagiarism are met there is no reason why information from the British Civil War website can not be summarised and and cited like any other copyright text. But it can not be copied under its copyleft licence into Wikipedia articles because its licence is more restrictive than the Wikipedia licence.
--PBS (talk) 13:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem rectified

message: If anyone is interested, I am rewriting this article. The present one doesn't have very much information and is poorly sourced; I am reusing most of it, but the structure needs to be dramatically changed. Mr Peregrine (talk) 23:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: No online source for the text itself of this document?-- Bancki (talk) 17:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  source text
Talk:Wedgefield (CDP), South Carolina

message: I am pretty sure that this place is not Wedgewood but rather Wedgefield. I was born and reared near here in Sumter, SC and I can tell you that if the census has this place designated as Wedgewood it is wrong. I hesitate to make any edits without knowing if the census has the name wrong. Rbrown3rd 23:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The post office name for Zip Code 29168 is Wedgefield, SC per http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/citytown_zip.jsp clariosophic (talk) 01:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wedgefield vs Wedgewood
Talk:Dunedin High School

message: I personally think DHS deserves a lot more content on this page, as well as a better photo of the school, preferably of the east side facing Pinehurst. I'm not the one to do it though, unless I am told, I only came to fix citations and add a more accurate photo of our school, despite it being from a horrid angle.
Ben Fishman - Dunedin High School, Florida 18:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Vidarabine

message: The reference "McGuigan, C. Antiviral Chemotherapy – Cardiff University, 3rd Year Pharmacy Notes Lecture Notes." is not a reliable source and is unverifiable to anyone but McGuigan.  Can someone find another references for these statements?  --Selket Talk 23:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Is it really more toxic than Gancyclovir? At the end of the article, it says that side effects are rare and in most cases only occur after high doses. In Gancyclovir, side effects are not so rare. Chaptagai (talk) 22:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More toxic than intravenous Gancyclovir?
Talk:George F. Emmons

message: The only citation on this bio is the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships.  There is no indication that the dictionary contains bios of the individuals for whom ships are named.  Therefore this article might be unsourced - can anyone confirm one way or the other? Squalk25 17:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:SM Entertainment

message: The redirect Pinkblood (South Korean group) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 17:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pinkblood (South Korean group)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Pinkblood (South Korean band) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 17:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pinkblood (South Korean band)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Pinkblood (group) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 17:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pinkblood (group)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Pinkblood (band) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 17:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pinkblood (band)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect PinkBlood has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 17:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:PinkBlood]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Pinkblood has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 18:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pinkblood]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: NCT currently has 26 members, not 20, after the addition of the Japanese subunit NCT Wish. This information has been updated on the main NCT page. The citation for this is the third on the NCT page. I'm not well-versed in Wikipedia editing so I can't update the page myself. Hope this brings itself to the attention of someone who can! 2603:3021:803:EE00:8189:FC16:A68F:894E (talk) 03:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated NCT Information
Talk:Electrochemical machining

message: Is it "Electro Chemical Machining" or "Electrochemical machining?" Just wondering. If the latter, the namespace should be changed to reflect it if that's the more standard spelling in the industry? Mgmirkin 23:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Electrochemical" is the way I've always seen it spelled, therefore I'm going to go ahead and make the move. Wizard191 (talk) 17:45, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Electrochemical is one word as used by ASME Wilhkar (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Silly question?

message: Discussion about dubious statement regarding materials. ASME article refers to machining titanium aluminides, Inconel 718, and Waspalloy using ECM. Wilhkar (talk) 19:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  materials that are processed by ECM
Talk:USS Alliance (1778)

message: "C Class" for an article lifted in its entirety from another source is a sham. JMHO, of course.--Reedmalloy (talk) 19:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: shrug, the writing is above average, the C refers to the lack of inline references. take a look at some of the EB1911 ones.  Slowking4: 741k 20:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Burnham Park (Chicago)

message: Any thoughts on a DYK nomination?  Maybe the fact that Burnham Park (Chicago) was a candidate to be the United Nations headquarters. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK 

message: It seems the Museum Campus may technically be in Grant Park (Chicago).  Does anyone know for sure? TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum Campus 

message: Who knows the procedure to correctly license an image from flicker (http://www.flickr.com/photos/kim_scarborough/54167350/ ).? TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 06:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can use that one as is ... just pick  from the dropdown box on the upload page. Daniel Case 03:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flicker Promontory Point Photo 

message: It has been proposed that Burnham Park be renamed and moved to Burnham Park (disambiguation).  Please discuss at Talk:Burnham Park.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: He landed at this park at 10am in February for Valentines Day. This is now Obama Park.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.3.229.222 (talk) 15:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obama? 
Talk:Richard B. Pelzer

message: I found this list of "works offered" in the article, commented out, with the comment
    Do not uncomment this section until it has been re-written with normal capitalisation
But I am thinking that, even with correct capitalization, this list might not be appropriate for inclusion in the article.  They might not be notable, as there is no evidence that 
Is there any evidence that there is progress towards their eventual publication?  Would they even be published under the titles given here?  Maybe this section should not be uncommented at this time?
* What if © 2006, The Beginning 
* Letters to Adam © 2006, The Diary 
* You Don't Know Jack © 2006
* Apparitions © 2006, You Only Live Twice 
* In One Moment© 2006 
* The Marriage Broker © 2006, Death Do Us Part 
* Karen's Garden © 2004 
* In the Service of.© 2004 
* Brother Eerie © 2006 
* Dead Man's Chest © 2005, A Five Book Series 
* Perditions © 2004 
* Gene© 2006 
* Seer and Revelator © 2006, A Five Book Series 
* The Boys Adventure Club © 2006 
* Whisky Lullaby © 2006 
* Return To Egypt © 2006  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SV Resolution (talk • contribs) 16:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard B pelzer

message: Pelzer's page is written like a promo. I just stripped out the Amazon purchase links for his two memoirs, along with the book blurb text (which was surely copyright text), but being brand new to edits, I doubt what I've left is quite up to par. Also, I left the "current work" blurb, because I'm not even sure what the book title is, and again, I don't know how best to handle this whole thing. But the links to go buy on Amazon really needed removing ASAP, so I couldn't just sit and leave those. But I'm hoping someone experienced can come and fix up his page better than I've handled it. HiddenBookworm (talk) 08:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional style
Talk:71st (City of London) Yeomanry Signal Regiment

message: Much of the article content is not supported by the single reference cited. Gab4gab (talk) 15:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. BlueD954 (talk) 06:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: Hi @Dormskirk as per our discussion, can you get the page renamed?  I noticed there is already a redirect, so that would be a fix for you to do..  J-Man11 (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - If there is a consenus for this (and I was content with it) you should be able to proceed with the changes yourself, requesting the deletion of any redirects as necessary. If you struggle, feel free to let me know. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 14:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have requested deletion of the redirect. Dormskirk (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name changes.
Talk:36th (Eastern) Signal Regiment

message: I'm hereby requesting this page be transferred to the title of 36th (Eastern) Signal Regiment to keep it consistent with the other signal regiment pages made and coming.  Leaving a redirect would be the best option.  But all the page names should be consistent. Tagging @Dormskirk and @SmartyPants22. J-Man11 (talk) 01:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK with me. Dormskirk (talk) 09:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Carolina Gynning

message: I have tagged the text about her line of perfumes as having failed verification, because the reference given only leads to a price comparison site (pricerunner.se), showing that the perfumes exist, without supporting the rest of the text. And the claim that she's the first and only Swedish woman to have her own perfume is totally unsourced. Thomas.W  talk 20:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed verification 
Talk:Newcastle Civic Centre

message: The commissioning coincided with T Dan Smith's administration which is worth a mention for historical context.212.85.13.68 13:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I wondered about that, but I couldn't find anything specific about his involvement when I started the article, and as his tenure can be a fairly controversial subject I thought it best not to mention it unless I had a specific source. It would be a useful addition if anybody can help, though. Bob talk 16:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  T Dan Smith 

message: This article refers to a new city hall being built.  What happened to the old one?  I can't find anything on the web that tells me. Matthew (talk) 22:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old city hall
Talk:Hipster doofus

message: While "doofus" is a word popularized by Seinfeld and associated with Cosmo Kramer, the phrase "hipster doofus" seems to have a life of its own -- instead of a redirect page, shouldn't we have a disambig page with links both to Kramer and to the term (whether at WP or Wiktionary)?
Rapotter 00:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Socialist Legality

message: this should simply be merged with the subsection of socialist legality
not many people would search for socialist legality by itself, but instead it would supplement an article about socialism much better.
Willmccomas 00:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. It should be merged. Superzohar  Talk 22:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion
Talk:31st (City of London) Signal Regiment

message: I'm hereby requesting this page be transferred to the title of 31st (Greater London) Signal Regiment to keep it consistent with the other signal regiment pages made and coming.  Leaving a redirect would be the best option.  But all the page names should be consistent. Tagging @Dormskirk and @SmartyPants22.  J-Man11 (talk) 01:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK with me. Dormskirk (talk) 09:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Fayette County High School (Georgia)

message: I think saying things like "excels in fine arts, athletics and, especially, academics" violates the neutrality agreement, especially since this statement is a bit of an exaggeration. What do YOU think you fucking imbecils?!
I agree completely.  Stop editing the truth, admins!Moldysocks 15:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Black Mountain Middle School

message: Could anyone create a page for all the other schools in the Poway Unified School District? Macken985 01:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but these schools do not all need their own pages on Wikipedia. The consensus right now it that unless a school's notability stands out from all the rest and has multiple, non-trivial, independent sources to back up that notability they do not deserve an article on Wikipedia. —Ocatecir Talk 00:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of United States senators in the 96th Congress

message: The redirect United States Senators by seniority(1979) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:United States Senators by seniority(1979)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of United States senators in the 95th Congress

message: *David Durenberger took office in Nov 1978 during this congress
*Rudy Boschwitz took office in Dec 1978
they should be added to the list Skippypeanuts (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The redirect United States Senators by seniority(1977) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:United States Senators by seniority(1977)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]