Talk:Outer Plane

message: Outer Planes
    
    
      Mount Celestia
      Bytopia
      Elysium
      The Beastlands
      Arborea
    
    
      Arcadia
      The Outlands&The Spire
      Ysgard
    
    
      Mechanus
      Limbo
    
    
      Acheron
      Pandemonium
    
    
      Baator
      Gehenna
      The Gray Waste
      Carceri
      The Abyss
    
What do you think? I suggest we put one of these into every article about the outer planes and one to the main article. IMO it is more organized than the table with descriptions... Anthough the descriptions are useful, too. --Koveras  21:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: font size a bit small; fixed -shoecream 05:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Sure. The only reason I used HTML syntax was that it was easier for me this way. --Koveras  12:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template proposal 

message: Following on from what I was saying above, I think we should make this article more about outer planes in general than the specific ones of the standard cosmology. It would be useful to retain whats here already under a section, then add sections detailing the outer planes of other cosmologies (Forgotten realms, eberron etc.)
Additionally, I'm not so sure that the huge table of planes is necessary, since the information is contained within the separate articles themselves (or should be).
What are peoples feelings on this? If there are no objections I will start to make some of the described changes. --Lewis 13:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: hold it, that table of plains is not "huge", it takes up barely 1/3 of the screen width, and since it goes at the bottom of articles anyway I don't see how that's an issue. Also, I think this page should stay as the standard cosmology since I don't think anyone else really uses anything else. Feel free to start a page at Non-standard cosmologies in the Planescape campaign setting or words to that effect. -shoecream 21:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry dude, i wasnt talking about the template, which i think is pretty good, but the table with plane/names/inhabitants that dominates most of the article. Also the statement that you dont think anyone else uses other cosmologies is just opinion, and i think for completeness it is worth mentioning the outer planes from other cosmologies. I dont think a separate article as you suggest would be appropriate; the kind of thing i was thinking of doing is drafted on my talk page, if you'd like to have a quick look, your opinion would be appreciated. -- Lewis 22:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Focus of this artcile

message: due to the changes in cosmology with 4th eidtion does something need to be done to this article to update it to include the new cosmology as well the old? shadzar-talk 15:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  4th edition 

message: dont quote me on this but I'm fairly ceertain I read somewhere that Xoriat, the Realm of Madness cannot be Coterminous as a group of druids locked it (or something). I know its mentioned in the City of Towers, but it isnt told in any great detail  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.177.189.225 (talk) 13:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xoriat, the Realm of Madness 

message: As I noted in my change to the page, I deleted the section entitled "Alternative theories", as it seemed to detail real-life theories on other planes of existence, which has no relevance to the topic of a fictional cosmology. If there was some relevance to that section that I somehow missed, feel free to restore it. -- Dracomortis (talk) 03:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually poorly phrased in-universe information which was presented with insufficient context. It refers to fictionalized versions of real-world cultures within D&D, such as the cultures of Kara-Tur, Mulhorand, Unther and numerous prime worlds mentioned but not detailed in the Planescape setting. I've re-added the section and rewritten it for clarity, however I don't have access to any citeable sources. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 08:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real-World Information 

message: As this article is lacking in secondary sources:  has quite a bit to say about the Outer Planes. Daranios (talk) 18:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Secondary source

message: "Baator" points to a new article, which turns out to be a redirect to this same "Outer Plane" article. 213.93.223.201 (talk) 17:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out.  I merged some of the content from here just to give context to readers, but merging too much of it seemed like a bad idea. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 00:38, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baator 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Primus (Dungeons & Dragons). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 11#Primus (Dungeons & Dragons) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Primus (Dungeons & Dragons)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]