lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Printer-friendly

message: I created this page, I like this site and had helped me a lot during my research, just hope someone can improve it.
Baqueiro
---
I came to this page because I was looking to find a way to get a printer friendly version of a Wikipedia page.  Is there such functionality?  If there is, it would be nice if instructions about it were linked from this article.  If there isn't, it would be nice if the article mentioned this.
:Look for the link labeled "Printable version". Wikipedia has a policy not to self-reference itself in articles, have a look at Wikipedia:Self-references to avoid. --Abdull (talk) 10:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentary
Talk:Bijan Jazani

message: Ok, two things that have to be added to this article:
* Continue adding items to "Activity in an open Political Climate"
* Legacy of Bijan Jazani
I dont know how much information should be added to an article but I figure that as long as I am stating facts, it should be fine.
Please add your thoughts on this matter here.  --prashidi 19:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No Evidence has been presented in this article about his alleged "murder" by SAVAK! Speculations without legitimate proof must be deleted.
Also the whole article is obviously biased and looks like official oppinions of the communist party instead of a neutral biography! Shir-e-Iran (talk) 23:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Evidence about his death

message: Iagree that the evidence that SAVAK murdered Jazani and the other 8 prisoners in 1975 was clearly publicized by one of the executioners in 1979 during his trial. Obviously, that agent, a hit man, did not and likely could not comment on the reasons for the order to kill those particular prisoners (such as who made the final decision and why, especially at a time when Jazani was moving away from the urban guerilla fight tactic and more towards political activism, or if the decision was made by Shah himself or his foreign advisors, etc., who were worried about any genuine ideologists for the future when there would be a real need for leadership when there was a vacuum in leadership that resulted in the islamists' take over, etc). This was besides all other indirect evidences. It goes without saying that no dictator and their notorious secret police would provide more material evidence for the history or to be used in a court against them; still this particular incidence is one of the best documented cases of crime. Gmotamedi 05:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on the evidence problem
Talk:Tropical bottlenose whale

message: I was reading an article about a strange carcase of a whale found this week in Australia. After reading the article, i came over to wikipedia to see what it offer about the strange whale. Both article agree in that the whole is rare, but wikipedia says there has never been a complete specimen found while the washingtonpost article says a single whole specimen has been found. One has to be wrong factually and i can't figure out which. These are the quotes that contradict each other.
*Wikipedia
"The species has only ever been identified from two skulls. No full-body specimen has ever been found alive or dead anywhere in the world". 
*Washingtonpost
"Scientists initially thought the 20-foot female may be a Longman's beaked whale - a species so rare that only one other complete adult specimen has been found in the world."
Here is washingtonpost article  You need registration, but posting the article here may lead to copyright issues. There is tricks out there to go around the retarded registration. I did check BBC for article about this whale, just to figure out which side to lean on, but it looks like they don't have one yet.
:In fact at least three complete specimens have washed up so far, and this whale is much more documented than the article suggests, so I gave it an overhaul. I have yet to hear anything about a new specimen from Australia, but it wouldn't surprise me, that's where the species was orignally known from after all.Cameron 03:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Politics of Burkina Faso

message: News reports tend to be very unclear but there is some sore sort of protests/uprising/revolt/revolution going on in Burkina Faso right now, including a curfew on Ouagadougou and some reports that president Blaise Compaore has fled. How about an article, 2011 Burkina Faso uprising, based on the French version or its translation here Metaknowledge (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 uprising in Burkina Faso 

message: The most recent elections it talks about was 2005, but it says there should be elections every 5 years.  Also how outdated the article is seems inconsistent between different sections and other sections of the article don't say anything about events past the 90's, or have other outdated information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.94.88.57 (talk) 21:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is very outdated
Talk:Mandate

message: There are a lot of articles which point to this disambiguation page, but which I cannot disambiguate because the intended meaning does not appear to be covered by any existing articles. 
#There appears to be a legal meaning of "mandate" within US law or civil law generally, which I assume means something along the lines of "legal requirement of a governing body" or "compulsory action", but which is not covered by Mandate (criminal law). Examples: Universal Product Code, Power of attorney, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
#Along similar lines there are Our Lady of La Salette and Simon de Gunby where it is the Pope or Vatican who issues the mandate. Is this exactly the same meaning, or yet another?
I don't know whether to leave these as is, redirect to Wiktionary:mandate or request creation of articles Mandate (legal) and Papal mandate. Pending a decision, I have tagged some of them as  --Redrose64 (talk) 19:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article required?
Talk:Dinocephalosaurus

message: Why do people insist on putting this animal in the category of Dinosaur.  It isn't a dinosaur!
::Because its name makes it sound like one...? Looks like we need a new category, ' Prehistoric reptiles'. I'll create it and then you can fill it up...The Singing Badger 18:11, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds like a plan.  I know lots of them.   :)  Nodosaurus
my is this page "Dinocephalosaurus orientalis", why cant it just be "Dinocephalosaurus"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammonight423 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Just a quirk of how the article was created.  It could certainly be moved to Dinocephalosaurus, although I'd want to check for other species of Dinocephalosaurus first. J. Spencer 01:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I've removed it from that category. ArthurWeasley (talk) 23:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Texas's 1st congressional district

message: I'm moving this page because I think it would be better to have an overall information page about this district (map, statistics, etc.) in addition to having the list of previous Congressmen from this district.  This could be a template for all 430 (or however many) districts in the U.S.  
The name itself is up for debate, especially with states without multiple districts (like Alaska). RADICALBENDER★ 17:37, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the title be Texas' 1st congressional district? Tompw (talk) (review) 22:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: It is rather unusual to find election results for a senate race or a gubernatorial race in an article about a congressional district. There is no source for those two results given. Did somebody just make them up or is there a source? I couldn't find any --FideKoeln (talk) 20:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen it elsewhere too and the numbers could not be verified --FideKoeln (talk) 10:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I suggest, therefore, applying , then. —GoldRingChip 14:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent election results from statewide races
Talk:Twofish

message: There appears to be a great deal of information regarding the AES selection and Twofish (and all the other nominees) here at .  I'm going to incorporate parts of this into the article, including the info about supposed breaks, but be forewarned, I'm not a crypto geek. Sword 17:45, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Information

message: Twofish's S-boxes are key dependent but do not change with each encryption. The attack referred to is  (ps) but it's not very relevant (it only breaks five of Twofish's 16 rounds) and should either form part of a longer section on cryptanalysis of Twofish or be dropped.  I've removed it for now.  ciphergoth 13:01, 2004 Nov 16 (UTC)
:For reference, S. Murphy and M. Robshaw report that knowing that the S-boxes change with each encryption, that one can craft a differential attack by choosing a plaintext and seeing what the output is. This has only been suggested against a reduced-round (near 5) Twofish. is the removed text. — Matt 13:16, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Murphy & Robshaw attack

message: It might be worth mentioning how many rounds can currently be broken. This is mentioned in "A Performance Comparison of the Five AES Finalists", but I don't know if that is still sufficiently up-to-date.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.136.40 (talk) 12:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attacks on Twofish with reduced number of rounds 

message: The dramatic 'outdated' notice at the top of the page totally puzzles me. Whoever put it there could have written two words to at least hint at what he had in mind. Currently, it leaves the impression that Twofish was totally broken by some recent ingenious attack but I fail to find anything about it, quite the contrary. 84.50.19.83 (talk) 06:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it. If anyone wishes to put it back up, do include a reason.77.68.144.35 (talk) 08:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated??
Talk:On Being the Right Size

message: This article is obviously copied from elsewhere on the net. It was all typed in one edit by 66.116.71.28?
: I don't think so. It also has a bad title and, I feel, waffles.--Honeycake 17:49, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Copied] 

message: The 3rd paragraph in the linked copy of the essay has a few words deleted.  A version containing the full text is here: http://www.physlink.com/Education/essay_haldane.cfm —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.164.193.248 (talk) 06:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linked copy of essay is missing text 

message: Perhaps a dissection of the final paragraph would be appropriate to highlite the political view of the author.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealAlmo (talk • contribs) 18:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of Political Commentary at end of essay 

message: I found a good citation for Jane Jacob's usage of Haldane's principle, which I added in the article, but there is another principle titled Haldane principle which also happens to be used in civic contexts. Furthermore, there is a separate, more specific, Haldane's rule (by J.B.S.) which is used by biologists. If you Google "Haldane's principle", it appears the Internet is confused too, with circular citations, which I suspect go back to this Wikipedia entry. Philosophistry (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible conflation with [[Haldane principle|R.B. Haldane's principle]]
Talk:Lenar Hoyt

message: Lenar Hoyt was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was MERGE AND REDIRECT
Character from Hyperion by Dan Simmons book. Not notable in itself. JFW | T@lk 18:25, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:The Best of Both Worlds (Van Halen album)

message: Releasing one album isn't really an era, and repeating that none of his songs are in this compliation is redundant from the first section's mention.  OK to remove this entry? 209.180.155.14 (talk) 03:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gary Cherone era 
Talk:Skittish

message: Article needs to be rewritten in a more formal, neutral, encyclopedic style. Also a WP:COI issue, the article was largely edited by  who identifies as the subject Mike Doughty. -- œ™ 22:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Leibniz's rule (derivatives and integrals)

message: shouldn't it read Leibniz' rule? — MFH: Talk 22:39, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Even if his name was Leibnis, there is one convention that dictates to write "Leibnis's", the other being to write "Leibnis'" -- but his name is not spelt Leibnis, it's spelt Leibniz. Dysprosia 03:06, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

text: The /z/ and /tz/ sounds do not end in the softer /s/ sound, I believe. Dysprosia 21:47, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling
Talk:Tibia

message: Hello. "and patella"  should be removed from this entry in the first section as it doesn't articulate with the tibia. The Wiki entry for patella has a good diagram showing how it only articulates with the femur. Thanks! Kismet68 (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articulating Bones 

message: "But, the fact is tibia is the strongest bone."
The term "strongest bone" is not very precise. The person who wrote this probably meant that it can bear the most axial load before failure, but finding a real source for this information (if its true)
would be good.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.113.251.144 (talk) 06:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strongest Bone 

message: Is that we have a lot of section headings, sometimes for just a sentence or two. And it seems that the language used sometimes requires a knowledge of anatomy. I think we should make edits to make it more approachable for people who don't know anatomical terms. Biosthmors (talk) 00:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple things I notice 

message: I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:
* I feel it is needlessly fragmented to have two separate pages. 
* It is standard on Anatomy pages, and recommended in WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy, for 'Development' sections to be displayed on the same page. 
* Additionally, this page is small and it would give more context to have the information displayed in a central location, rather than hidden on a separate article. 
* If necessary, this article could be expanded at a later date. LT910001 (talk) 07:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Ossification of tibia]] 

message: No need for separate articles, can easily be integrated into main article Tom (LT) (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Lower extremity of tibia]] 

message: as above Tom (LT) (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Body of tibia]] 

message: As stated in the first paragraph of the article, all the vertebrates have tibia, this may be misleading. But I'm also not sure, that's why asking. Sntshkmr60 (talk) 18:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do fishes have tibia?
Talk:Tammany Hall

message: Yes... I live in an apartment complex named Tammany Hall. It is located at 4386 Escondido Street, Las Vegas, NV 89119. It was interesting to me to see the history of the name. (Aside: I do not understand anything about this "Cite" and ref tags. Would appreciate help.)
Machdohvah (talk) 18:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed your cite.--Auric  talk 17:31, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is a Tammany Hall in Las Vegas, NV 

message: The lead says, "...founded in 1786 and incorporated on May 12, 1789, as the Tammany Society. It was the main local political machine of the Democratic Party..." (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tammany_Hall&oldid=1004798182) However, the Democratic Party was not founded until much later than the 18th century. There are other related temporal inconsistencies in those sentences. Those sentence need to be rewritten to fix that. Sparkie82 (t•c) 21:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Changed "was" to "became". Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporal inconsistency in the lead 

message: The comic strip Calvin and Hobbes referenced Tammany Hall as in here: https://www.reddit.com/r/calvinandhobbes/comments/79kx3o/tammany_hall_strip/
Can we put this in the popular culture section? Governmentofjoeland (talk) 00:29, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calvin and Hobbes Reference
Talk:Atrial flutter

message: AFFIRM specifically enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation, not flutter. The trial has no place in this article. If you are aware of a trial that looked at mortality outcomes with atrial flutter (cardioversion vs. rate-control) I would like to read it. Axl 20:33, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: An image of the action of the heart during flutter would greatly improve this article.  Exploding Boy 23:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: - ECG criteria need revising; F waves in the frontal plane are the most specific. JFW | T@lk 14:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ECG criteria 

message: JFW | T@lk 11:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Quicker:  JFW | T@lk 11:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: This is from the article:
Catheter ablation of the isthmus is a procedure usually available in the electrophysiology laboratory. Eliminating conduction through the isthmus prevents reentry, and if successful, prevents the recurrence of the atrial flutter.
Type II flutter follows a significantly different re-entry pathway to type I flutter, and is typically faster, usually 340–430 beats/minute.
1) Is catheter ablation specifically relevant to type I or does it also apply to type II?  Mention of ablation after type I suggests to me the former.
2) "Available in the electrophysiology laboratory" Why in a laboratory as opposed to a hospital or clinic?  Is the terminology geographically specific? In at least some places in Canada, the procedure is done in a hospital.
Thanks, CBHA (talk) 01:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions to help clarify article
Talk:1700s in literature

message: This page (to which I contributed substantially) has now been superseded by the articles on individual years in literature within the decade, and is effectively redundant.  However, I wouldn't like to delete it (nor would I dream of breaking the rules in this way) without being sure that no one else is likely to cross-refer to it or want to access it. Deb 20:40, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kill Bill: Volume 1

message: Empire Awards lack credibility. They were Awards were given by a British film magazine sponsored by a company in a joint Venture with Sony Corp. they have awarded best picture Awards to movies that's Sony owns. It's hard to imagine a more direct conflict of interest. I looked at the Wikipedia pages of several of the movies that awarded best pictures to and don't even see any mention of the awards on those pages. My guess is fans of the Kill Bill movies are scraping the bottom of the barrel to come up with awards for the movie one since neither received any Academy Award nominations. The company that sponsors the awards creates the appearance of a direct conflict of interest regarding movies that it gives Awards to whether or not the is an actual conflict. For instance, it gave best picture to Men in Black, a movie sony owns and that grossed over 500 million dollars yet there is no mention of it on the Men in Black Wikipedia page.  Jackhammer111 (talk) 19:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empire awards

message: Hi, we're a group of students from Queen Mary, University of London (Swaii400, Barry0506, DogmanElliott, Thatbeardguy, Charlie0014), tasked with making improvements to this Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swaii400 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi guys. Please read WP:STUDENTS and enjoy Wikipedia. Thanks. Popcornduff (talk) 03:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student project

message: The list of other languages for this page  is incomplete.  Some Wikipedias (such as the Japanese Wikipedia) have a single article for both Volume 1 and Volume 2 combined, so the article is not linked from here.  "Kill Bill" redirects here, so this is the page for the whole "Kill Bill" series.  Articles for either Volume 1 itself or Volume 1 and 2 combined should be linked from here.  What is the proper way to get such combined articles linked from this page?
--Dwedit (talk) 20:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages List incomplete 

message: Why is the name of the bride not mentioned in the article? It is mentioned in the very first scene of the film ("Kiddo") and is completely shown on her flight ticket: Beatrix Kiddo - so why is it missing in the article? ~~~~ 2A0A:A541:12AA:0:D4F2:D2F7:7796:6DBB (talk) 17:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really part of the plot of this film. She's referred to as the Bride. Popcornfud (talk) 17:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is her name not allowed to be mentioned?  

message: The chronology of the wikipeida page does not match up with the chronology of the film. In the film it's clearly noted that The Bride first goes to kill O-ren as her name is already crossed off when The Bride kills Vernita Green. 2603:7000:A100:2D93:482A:4D81:7CD1:582F (talk) 00:28, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology of the film
Talk:Cocoliche

message: Someone of a linguistic background feel free to elaborate.
Italian and Spanish are similar enough to be
considered dialect of eachother(at least with
som good will).
A pidgin is a language without complex
grammatical constructs.
I thus find it hard to believe that
Cocoliche is/was a true pidgin.
I must admit that I have no
linguistic background.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.178.1.10 (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not well versed on how to classify Cocoliche, but I agree in saying I'm not sure if I would say it is a pidgin. I will say that Italian and Spanish are not dialects of each other, as they are two separate languages. That being said, they do belong to the Romance language family, which is why some words are mutually intelligible. A dialect usually connotates a regional difference of one language, e.g. Australian English versus Canadian English. Hope this can provide some clarification! From an anthropology student Heir-of-Isildur (talk) 01:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: I think there should be a link to the work of Maria Vittoria Calvi the world's leading expert on Spanish-Italian similarities and differences (and language pedagogy) somewhere on Wikipedia.She is also a world expert on Cocoliche Maybe there should even be a Wikipedia page (at least a stub) on her (I do not know how to set up a page myself however). This is because there are quite a few people who know Italian and would like to learn to speak good Spanish (by way of Italian, not by way of English or other languages) and quite a few people who would like to learn Italian who already know Spanish. I myself am half Italian and I learned Spanish in this way (i.e. with a lot of help from my knowlege of Italian). Very few books have been written about this topic. The research by Maria Vittoria Calvi and books written by her in this area is excellent and would be of interest to a lot of people.
Should link to her website. A lot of her works are also on various places on the internet as PDF's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.5.244 (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Please: Works by Maria Vittoria Calvi leading expert on Spanish-Italian similarities and differences and teaching
Talk:Linji Yixuan

message: Isn't Soto more widespread than Rinzai? 91.106.167.126 (talk) 14:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most widespread Zen sect? 