Talk:Computer-assisted translation

message: I don't know who is 216.252.85.232 but OmegaT+ is not what he claims it to be.
OmegaT+ is an obsolete fork of OmegaT and does not support half the formats indicated here. Beside, OmegaT+ is _not_ listed anymore on the FSF free software directory while OmegaT is there, hence, it is arguable that OmegaT is "only" open source. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jc helary (talk • contribs) 14:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a reference to the page describing the formats supported by OmegaT+.  The page does not mention StarOffice, but I assume since OmegaT had supported StarOffice from a long time ago, support for it may also be present in OmegaT+. --leuce 16:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I do believe number of members is irrelevant; but IMO "OmegaT" is alphabetically higher than "OmegaT+" anyway, and should therefore be listed higher. --leuce 16:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OmegaT+ status 

message: I've added some TMX tools to the Translation_Memory_eXchange page... please if you know of more such tools, please add them there.--leuce 15:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TMX tools added 

message: I suggest we add a column in the CAT compare table in which the nature of the tool is mentioned.  For example, ForeignDesk is a l10n tool, Okapi is a TM editing suite (AFAIK), OmegaT is a translation tool with fuzzy matching, etc.  Only information that describes the nature of the tool should be mentioned in that column. --leuce 16:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the table should be on a separate page ("List of Computer-assisted Translation Tools" or some such?) --babbage (talk) 10:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: more info in CAT compare table 

message: i am looking for a translation -
"ha molti talenti"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.208.230.51 (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  translator  

message: Can I name some other CAT tools on the market. 
  - Swordfish http://www.maxprograms.com/products/swordfish.html   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.54.250.152 (talk) 15:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some others CAT tool 

message: I found that "Déjà Vu (http://atril.com/en)" was missing in the list of CAT tools under the "Some notable CAT tools" section. And I normally use "across" (http://www.my-across.net/en/fdb-register.aspx.) How about adding "Déjà Vu" and "across" to the list? Trekkersky (talk) 00:28, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of CAT tools 

message: http://kilgray.com/products/memoq  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.19.150.26 (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  and about MemoQ? Why not listed? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Computer-assisted translation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425021222/http://etudiant.uqo.ca/tamacanada2008/documents/Tama_workshop_warburton.pdf to http://etudiant.uqo.ca/tamacanada2008/documents/Tama_workshop_warburton.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Current text says, "Electronic dictionaries, either unilingual or bilingual, also known as dictorobotary"  I'm removing "dictorobotary" (which just looks like a silly reference from 'Plan 9' or something.)  If a citation to its *serious* use can be provided, then the citation needs to be included with the term. DKEdwards (talk) 16:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  dictorobotary 

message: Happy new year 104.193.1.111 (talk) 17:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Happy new year