lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Equality Ohio

message: This article is dealing with an organization in Ohio and wish to keep this page up. This page should be kept up to help anyone who wants to know of an LGBT organization in ohio. Equality Ohio is an actual organization set in Columbus, Ohio.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JCHerron (talk • contribs) 17:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've declined the proposed deletion of the article.  While the article may be sent by others for discussion to "Articles for Deletion", it's unlikely, in my personal opinion, to be deleted based on notability concerns in view of the sources I've added to the article.  Improving the article further, through the addition of information backed by reliable, secondary sources, will help that process further.  Finally, please drop me a line if you see other, well, suspicious deletions like this one.  (New account, one edit ever, but with a familiarity with Wikipedia deletion processes?  I'm afraid that's a bit of a WP:DUCK situation.)  One additional thing, for "Proposed Deletions" (not "articles for deletion"), you may, yourself, remove the "proposed deletion" template if you feel that an article should not be deleted.  The proposed deletions process is only for uncontroversial deletions, and if you think it's done in error, it's not uncontroversial.   Drop me a line on my talk page if you have any further concerns or questions, thanks!  --j⚛e deckertalk 18:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to not delete page

message: This article currently has a link to a disambig page sex reassignment. I'm uncertain which is the preferred link for this item. If someone could adjust to the correct ambig wikilink, that'd be great. Thanks! ZueJay (talk) 06:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the reference anymore.  --j⚛e deckertalk 03:19, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig request

message: The only thing that concerns me about the tone here is the last sentence of the first paragraph.  I'll take a shot tonight but I'm off for T'giving dinner.  If someone wants to work on it before I get back, either directly quote the mission statement, or alternatively reword less promotionally.  --j⚛e deckertalk 19:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  --j⚛e deckertalk 03:19, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Blood Wedding

message: The section near the bottom, that talks about the 'themes' of the play, sounds like a high school assignment. It needs to be replaced with serious analysis, rather than talk about 'the theme of Individual vs. Society'. Good playwrights do not write plays with 'themes', they create characters, situations and dialogue which can suggest extraneous themes. Good criticism rarely refers to 'themes', which more often than not signify dumbed-down reductionism on the interpreter's part.--165.228.138.234 06:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Themes

message: Check it out:
http://ib11english.tripod.com/id8.html
Doesn't that invalidate sources?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.141.52 (talk) 06:11, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy of website

message: It,s the fourth or fifth time I find that Lorca wrote a trilogy of rural plays and that,s not true.
La casa de Bernarda Alba it,s an independant play.
Bodas de Sangre and Yerma are part of a not-finished "trilogy of Spanish earth", wich third play "La destruccion de Sodoma" (The fell of Sodoma) was not written because of Lorca,s death.
I,d like someone to correct this.
Paitxa  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.2.255.244 (talk) 11:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT TRILOGY

message: The symbolism section has a single vague, unreferenced sentence followed by a rather sizable quotation with no context. I'm removing it for now, because it serves no purpose in the article. Jfmantis (talk) 01:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Blood Wedding (play)#Symbolism|Symbolism]] section 

message: I removed a large section of text copied from here. The text was added 28 September 2011 and the oldest archive of the source is dated 25 April 2012. However, an editor did mention the apparent copyvio on this page in November 2011, and the section had the same non-Wikipedia-style paragraph indentation as the source, leading me to believe that this is indeed a copyvio. –dlthewave ☎ 19:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Ragsdale conjecture

message: I have improved and edited the article so that it maintains copyright guidelines. Sorry for the problem. Here is the link. Sr13 (T|C) 06:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Has this conjecture been disproved or what? ॐ Metta Bubble puff 05:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I'm adding what I can find. ॐ Metta Bubble puff 06:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm reluctant to remove the statements saying the conjecture is unsolved. But it is contradictory. ॐ Metta Bubble puff 07:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Rasgale's bound was disproved by Viro. The open question here is to find a sharper upper bound. shotwell 09:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, thanks. So can it be phrased a little clearer or is it just me getting confused? ॐ Metta Bubble puff 14:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It needs improving. Something like: "Oleg Viro constructed counter-examples to Ragsdale's conjecture in 1979. In 1993, Ilya Itenberg disproved the weaker Petrovsky-Rasgdale conjecture. Finding a sharp upper-bound for the number of even and odd ovals in an algebraic curve is still an open question."  Does that sound confusing? This is all far outside my area, so don't trust me too much. shotwell 16:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:The Devil and Miss Prym

message: I added the tags because the article reads like a review, especially the final section. Naysie 06:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, please use  for sentences, then detail issues here. This will help address them in a timely manner. - RoyBoy 04:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality & references
Talk:Dan Minogue

message: is he related to Kylie Minogue?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.94.60.111 (talk) 21:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jerónimo Bermúdez

message: I am removing the notability tag from the article; this historical person seems to meet WP:BIO, and sources seem to be available jusging by the spanish version of the article, es:Jerónimo Bermúdez. The english article would much benefit from a translation, I think. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 14:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Max Aub

message: There was no Vichy gov't in March 1940, so Aub cannot have been imprisoned by it then. 96.44.123.68 (talk) 15:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 
Talk:Equality Mississippi

message: I don't get what's the big deal in sending the supreme court an "Amicus brief". Is it really an achievement? --Damiens.rf 19:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amicus brief 

message: Some of the sources go to weblinks, but the dead ones can be found in the Internet Archive. Rather than further edit warring, can we please discuss them here?   Will Beback  talk   23:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Same message almost two years later. If there are disputes over sources please discuss rather than edit war.   Will Beback  talk   19:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: http://blog.al.com/live/2012/01/lucedale_family_concerned_abou.html
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1891&dat=20011215&id=I_8wAAAAIBAJ&sjid=_twFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1203,1571115  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.81.116.63 (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some useful links that need incorporating 
Talk:Viaje del Parnaso

message: The entire last paragraph is a biased critical evaluation, not a statement of fact. Therefore, I have added the "weasel words" warning.AlbertSM (talk) 22:12, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Final paragraph

message: I'm not sure how this sort of change typically comes about, but I think a means of expanding this article would be to expound upon the poem per partitions by the six chapters.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.218.67.81 (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article extension
Talk:Battlestars (game show)

message: The bonus for getting all six stars was definitely $1000 at some point in the first version, and I am pretty sure there was no bonus at some point on the second version (in fact, each podium on the second version had only three triangles instead of six, as in the first version).  I did not want to remove the part about the prize as it may have existed at some point in the run.  - That Don Guy (talk) 22:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonus for getting all six stars
Talk:Davis R. Ruark

message: I removed the listed fact that Ruark was "one of the youngest State's Attorneys in the history of Maryland."  I cannot find any proof of this to reference. Dave (talk) 01:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Casiodoro de Reina

message: Two articles about the same person. Reginaldus Gonsalvius Montanus is just a pseudonym for de Reina. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I think that a pseudonym will have sometimes a seperate article, when it's better; e.g. Richard Bachman and stephen king) If you will put such articles together a lot of informations will go away or the main article stephan king will be not readable with such informations. On the other hand it's actual position of science and by pseudonyms doubt are possible that the person X is the pseudonym y. In the past a lot of people means that a nother person was this pseudonym. This is written in this article. If you will merge this article it will be possible that a lot of users wll edit something to this discussion. I suppose this article will be unreadable. Another argument is that the main activity of de reina was the translation of the bible. his inquisition works not the main activity, but "one" sentence about it is interesting, too. But if you will merge the article I wish a lot of fun - please quotes quotes quotes - books books boos - habe a lot of fun in the library. I suppose that this merge will not be so simple. In this moment I have not this time to merge this articles 100 per cent correct. --Soenke Rahn (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection 

message: I agree that it is best not to merge the articles for the reasons given above. The same problem has been discussed in the German Wikipedia so the history of those articles should be consulted before an attempt to merge.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 10:37, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Is there any evidence that de Reina translated Castellio's anthology? If yes, where can it be found?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.21.135.183 (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of Castellio's "De haereticis an sint persequendi" 

message: There's a red-link to Juan Pérez de Pineda in the main page. There are Wikipedia pages about him in other languages, such as Spanish. See . If we are to repair the red-link, this needs translating into English. DFH (talk) 09:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juan Pérez de Pineda
Talk:Alfonso Azpiri

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mot_%28Animated_Televison_Series%29
Alfonso Azpiri created the character of Mot, so he has to be credited on thispage, as he was in the series.
I seriously hope somone finds this and will have the free time to carry out the much-needed research for this....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.189.58.47 (talk) 09:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The mot animation page
Talk:Robert Bray

message: We should also have a bio on the academic Robert Bray, who wrote various essays on the plays of Tennessee Williams, and other such work.  I've added such a request to Wikipedia:Requested articles. 75.214.228.186 (talk) (really, User:JesseW/not logged in) 19:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jason Webster (author)

message: I had no idea until I read this article the first time that the BBC had made a play.  I don't suppose there is any way of getting hold of a copy?  --Psicorps 13:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Radio 3 play 'Andalus' 
Talk:Webvideo

message: Webvideo is going to be expanded soon. I have previously written the dutch article, so if you are capable of speaking Dutch you might help in translating it.
:This page has a lot of potential (and potentially a lot of work). Let me know if I can help. I don't speak much Dutch, though. I put an UnderConstruction tag to let editors know you're working on it. Realkyhick 06:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under Construction
Talk:Urdunn

message: Redirects to the disambiguation page for Jordan rather than the page itself, my rationale being that this is merely the Arabic pronounciation of the word in the indefinite, al-Urdunn (though I don't really like this transliteration, English vowels are so imprecise. Oordann? Oardaan maybe?) more probably refers to the nation in modern times. --Dhimelright 06:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Guillem de Cabestany

message: I am not aware of any evidence that Cabestany died in 1212; Dictionnaire des lettres françaises: Le Moyen  ge, Hasenor et Zink (éd), Fayard, Paris, 1992, p. 258-259 suggests that he outlived Raimon, who Cardénas suggests probably died in 1218. Are there any sources that contradict this? Georgery Kempe (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date
Talk:Solar Cup

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 06:23, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:National Congress of the Canaries

message: The article in Canarias 7 mentions Antonio Cubillo in two instances:
*Por otro lado, Román Rodríguez, presidente de Nueva Canarias, rechaza el editorial y las propuestas de Antonio Cubillo para una República Federal Canria.
*El autor del texto es Antonio Cubillo, presidente del brazo político del Movimiento por la Autodeterminación e Independencia del Archipiélago Canario (MPAIAC). (it mentions Cubillo as the president of the political branch of the MPAIAC which is the CNC.)
And the symbol was created by him. Not by "Canarian independentists. The CNC is a very small minority party created by Cubillo after the MPAIAC.
Mohonu 18:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it doesn't say anything regarding neither the symbol nor the popularity of the symbol/party. It just states that Cubillo has proposed independence, and that 3 established political parties rejected the idea. --Soman 05:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CNC is the political wing of the defunct MPAIAC
Talk:James II of Majorca

message: The text says he ruled from 1243 to his death in 1311; the infobox says 1276 to 1311; which is correct? --FeanorStar7 01:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think 1243 is when he was born and 1276 when he was crowned. --Byblios (talk) 10:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Date discrepancy

message: The text mentions "In 1279, by the Treaty of Perpignan, he became a vassal of the Kingdom of Aragon", however by that time the Kingdom of Aragon belonged to the Crown of Aragon, which is the combination of the Catalan counties and the Kingdom of Valencia. So, I think it should be changed to Crown of Aragon. In the spanish page, it is refered as Crown of Aragon aswell.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byblios (talk • contribs) 10:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Missunderstanding
Talk:James IV of Majorca

message: We've got one cited source, a book on coinage, and one external reference not actually linked to any particular statement in the article. To my mind, the article therefore deserves to be tagged as in need of improvement, especially of citations and sources. I have seen many other articles so tagged that were in much better shape than this one. Is there a consensus on this?
Poihths (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations and sources? 

message: The wording  makes no sense. "As such" implies that being king consort normally meant exclusion from government. Moreover, I'm not sure why we are saying he "served" as king consort if he had no role in governing. My change in wording said nothing about any body. Srnec (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A king consort does not normally govern, unless declared a joint ruler. I don't like "served as" much either - "held the title of" might be better. My reason for reverting was that "the government" suggests there was a governing body, like the government of the UK, of which he was not part. That's not what "excluded from government" meant. Ian Dalziel (talk) 03:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are reading a lot into the word "the", but my real issue is with "as such", which just sounds wrong to me. If the intention is to say that he was a mere consort with no role in government, we should just say that rather than try to say it in a convoluted way. Srnec (talk) 16:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That is how I read it, yes. I do think "the" changes the meaning completely. I'll try to simplify it. Ian Dalziel (talk) 18:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording
Talk:Lotus Coffman

message: I removed a sentence from this article that claimed his childhood career goal was to be a bareback rider in a circus, but had no citation. If true, I'm not convinced this bit of trivia belongs in an encyclopedia article. If it's not true, it obviously doesn't. Please don't put that back in without citing a source. Pha telegrapher (talk) 13:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  bareback rider?
Talk:Lou Anna Simon

message: Is she, or was she, an Administrator?  Does one cease 'being' an Administrator by leaving one administrative role? 
* Lou Anna Kimsey Simon was an American university administrator.
* Lou Anna Kimsey Simon is an American university administrator. 
Does tense matter in this tense topic? MaynardClark (talk) 18:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to think someone who has trained for and worked in university administration since the 1970s has clearly established that as their profession, whether or not they're employed this minute. She hasn't even been out of the last job for a full day, and we have no way of knowing what will happen next with her career. I don't think it should be phrased in past tense unless she announces plans to retire (in which case it should probably just say she "is a retired...": have the first sentence say "she was [anything]" makes it sound like the subject is deceased.) Innisfree987 (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past or present?
Talk:Anne & Gilbert

message: I am one of the actors performing the show at Catholic Central. This is a fantastic show and I will continue to update this article as I can track down sources. --Brains03 07:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 
Talk:Fort Yamhill

message: The actual, original Fort Yamhill Blockhouse is now located in Courthouse Square Park in Dayton, OR. It was moved here in 1911 and has been cared for and maintained by the municipality for the last 100 years. It really should have its own wikipedia page. If not, then the Courthouse Square park (within which, it resides) should have its own dedicated page as a National Historic Site, with the Blockhouse featured as its most prominent structure. We at www.DaytonOregon.org have gotten numerous  emails over last 4 years from people who are confused as to its (the acutal Blockhouse)location. They are disappointed when they travel to the Fort Yamhill Heritage area (near Sheridan) and there is NO FORT there. It is a great site, but there is "no Fort" at "Fort yamhill". The actual structure that was the 'fortification'(Fort) is actually the Blockhouse and is actually in Dayton, which is in Yamhill County, BTW. The park that it resides in is on the historic register. One of the contributing reasons why the Park is on the Historic register (added in the 1980s), is/was the presence of the Blockhouse:
http://pdfhost.focus.nps.gov/docs/NRHP/Text/87000336.pdf
sorry , I am not a wikipedia expert. I hope this is helpful. It is just that there is confusion among visitors as to where the "structure" actually stands. The good folks at the Fort Yamhill Heritage site don't seem to mind that folks are confused when they get there and find no Fort/Blockhouse. The confusion is currently perpetuated on wikipedia when looking at the Fort Yamhill Page. Thank you.
Johncdc (talk) 01:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry but what confusion? Or are people not reading the article? It says, and I quote, "The blockhouse of the fort was moved to a park in downtown Dayton in 1911 to honor city founder Joel Palmer.[5] The actual site of the fort, which is in the Willamina vicinity, has been listed on the National Register of Historic Places since 1971." Even the caption to the picture clearly states the blockhouse is in Dayton. Further, the article talks about the fort site being undeveloped, but with "plans to reconstruct some of the fort buildings". Now, certainly, the park would be notable if it is on the NRHP and could have any article (and probably even the blockhouse too), but if people do not read the articles, then it doesn't really matter how many we have as to clearing up their confusion. To quote an old adage, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. I'll try to make it clearer in the article, but it is an encyclopedia entry and not a travel guide, so there is only so much we can do. Aboutmovies (talk) 03:14, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The actual/original blockhouse should have its own wikipedia page. 

message: Oregon Native Son Aboutmovies (talk) 03:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional source
Talk:Lester Hogan

message: I've cut this:
:He was among the people who signed the "Oregon Petition", which advocates that "Predictions of global warming are based on computer climate modeling, a branch of science still in its infancy. The empirical evidence [from] actual measurements of Earth's temperature shows no man-made warming trend" and is opposing the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.
Unless this can be referenced by more than a name on a list (which is practically anonymous) - i'm cutting it for WP:BLP concerns. (i've been unable to confirm it so far). --Kim D. Petersen 22:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oregon Petition 