Template talk:Final occupants of the Führerbunker

message: I originally had a "killed" section because of Fegelein, but knocked him into "uncertain" and the Goebbels children in with their parents, to save room, because the template is still too tall.  I'll rename to "killed themselves" though, to better encompass the Goebbels children Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 01:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You seriously distort the truth, it is like saying that a suicide bomber and their victims together killed themselves.--Patrick 09:33, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than the fact a suicide bomber doesn't have full legal guardianship of their victims, and there are not usually conflicting reports whether or not the victims were aware and agreed to the suicide pact.  Chances are, they didn't, but Joseph does say in his final testament that the children know of this, and agree with the decision. Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 17:25, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Legal guardianship is not relevant for distinguishing between suicide and murder. If there are theories about the children agreeing, you should mention that e.g. in Magda_Goebbels#Murder_and_suicide, currently the template contradicts that section.--Patrick 23:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Apart from whether it is true, "My wife and my children agree with this refusal." (of Joseph to leave Berlin) does not imply at all that the children agreed to be killed.--Patrick 02:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

text: It is absurd to say that the distinction between murder and suicide is a petty detail.--Patrick 00:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't list them as suicides, it lists them under "Killed themselves".  Joseph Goebbels didn't kill himself, somebody else did.  The Goebbels children were killed by their mother, as part of a "last-minute avoiding the Soviets pact" deal that history will likely never fully understand.  If the children had been gunned down by a rogue sentry, or had Soviets slit their throats, then yes they'd definitely be remembered differently.  But they were killed by their mother, who then immediately killed herself.  That means "The Goebbels family killed itself". Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 00:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Being killed at one's request may loosely be considered to be in the category of killing oneself, but that does not seem applicable for the children. In spite of a killer's possible good intentions, being killed without consent is still very different from killing oneself.--Patrick 02:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, so if you were to hypothetically "deal with the fact they're being listed right after their parents", would you be able to offer a better heading than "Killed themselves" for that section?  I originally had "Commit suicide", but I agreed with you that was less-than-ideal and changed it to "Killed themselves". Do you have a better suggestino for a name? Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 04:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said, being killed without consent is very different from killing oneself, so putting them in the same category would mean that you create a very broad category like "died", or an odd category like "died, not by enemy troops". They can be listed right after their parents if the parents are put at the end of one category, and the children in the next category.--Patrick 09:36, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: "Died before Soviet arrival" is half-decent, "Bodies found by Soviets" leaves Bormann, Fegelin and others a bit iffy, "Killed" would allow us to include Fegelin, but sounds a bit 'off' for Hitler and such.  Seems very much like a "Damned if we do, damned if we don't" situation.  The children should definitely be listed with their parents imho, but it's awkward to find a category name that encompasses "Killed themself" "Were killed by their parents" "Summarily executed" and everything else Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 22:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: : There's nothing preventing the use the formulation "Died" in the template, is there? I don't think the readers are that picky about it. However, "killed themselves" may be seen as kinda a weasel term; just think about it: "Joseph Goebbels, Magda and their children killed themselves". Now, you wouldn't see that in a newspaper, would you...
: But it's not that big a'deal....
: Fred-Chess 22:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Responses to RfC

message: As is mentioned already, the template is a little imprecise. The only person who were actually present in the bunker when the soviets arrived was Hentschel, according to this page. Do you think it'd be a good idea to split May 2 into "Left May 2" including Misch, Flegel and Haase and "Remained until Soviets arrived May 2" including only Hentschel? Or is the statement in the The Bunker page simply incorrect? I know Misch left shortly before the Russians arrived. I don't know about Flegel. IIRC Der Untergang said that Haase remained, but I may be mistaken, and so may the film be. Just an idea.... --Ojan 20:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think The Bunker is simply incorrect in that assertion, there was a handful of people when the Soviets entered, which definitely included Flegel since she later talked about the Soviets entering first, then once confirming it was just aides, nurses, etc, telling them to stay down there for a few hours while they went back aboveground and finished fighting, then came back down to process them. Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 22:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet arrival? 

message: I just saw this page after I edited the template to list the Goebbels children as "murdered". Oops. Was there a consensus? Everything I've ever seen and read says that
the children were murdered by their mother. They were first given morphine, then cyanide.
I really don't see how underage children could give meaningful consent to a suicide pact. After all, the youngest was only 4 years old. Karn 09:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was there a consensus on the Goebbels children? 

message: The recent book Hitler's Death, a compilation from the Soviet archives, gives Rattenhuber's name as Hans, not Johann. Does anyone know more about this? Adam 14:35, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: His given name was Johann; Hans can be used as a short form. See Junge, Traudle, Until the Final Hour, (English edition) London, 2002,  --TraceyR 14:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rattenhuber

message: I just added Ernst-Robert Grawitz. If he was in fact not present in the Führerbunker during this time, then please do change him accordingly. --Ojan 14:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added Helmut Kunz, as he must have been present in the Führerbunker according to his article --Ojan (talk) 18:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ernst-Robert Grawitz / Helmut Kunz 

message: In Junge, Traudle, Until the Final Hour, (English edition) London, 2002,  the author lists herself and 7 others as leaving the bunker together after midnight, i.e. on 1 May rather than 30 April. 
The group comprised:
* Traudl Junge
* Constanze Manziarly
* Else Krüger
* Gerda Christian
* Otto Günsche
* Wilhelm Mohnke
* Walter Hewel
* Hans-Erich Voss
I have changed to template accordingly. --TraceyR 14:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I welcome debate on the subject, but I definitely feel that "the night of April 30" should be listed at April 30, whether they left before the stroke of midnight or not, since the majority of departures in the final week were at night, and thus it makes more sense to group Junge's departure with Boldt and Below, who left only hours before as I recall, instead of with Mohnke and Stumpfegger who left the night of May 1. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  16:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to have misled you about the time; it was actually later than "after midnight"; Junge mentions that it was about 8:30 p.m. on May 1st when the group left the Chancellery building, so there is no problem with the date. According to Junge, she  didn't leave with Boldt and Below, but with those listed above and some other soldiers. She became separated from them later. --TraceyR 19:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, thought I'd seen her listed as the 30th in another book, but I could easily be mistaken - so unless somebody comes up with conflicting info, we'll stick with it how you have it. Thanks for the explanation and fixing it. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  21:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually she made the mistake of returning to Berlin after she was unable to reach the western Allied lines. She was then arrested and thrown in prison by the Soviets. Thereafter, she fell ill and was sent to a British hospital and then finally in Feb. 1946 moved to Bavaria. Kierzek (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to dates based on "Until the Final Hour" 

message: I listed the known members together for breakout groups and the order in which the known groups left: Mohnke was the leader group 1; Rattenhuber was the leader of group 2; Naumann was the leader of group 3 and Linge led yet another group. There were ten groups in all for the break-out from the Reich Chancellery and the Führerbunker (located under the Reich Chancellery gardens in the centre government district of Berlin). Sources: Beevor, Antony. Berlin: The Downfall 1945, Viking-Penguin Books, 2002, pp. 382-383; O'Donnell, James. The Bunker, Da Capo Press, reprint 2001, (orig. pub. 1978), pp. 271-276. Kierzek (talk) 18:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listed by known members of groups and order of breakout 

message: An editor has made significant changes to the template without discussion or consensus.  I have reverted those changes, and I am opening this discussion so that the editor can justify the changes made, and other editors can comment to agree or disagree with them. The changes should not be restored without a consensus on this page to do so.I have two books at hand on the topic, both titled The Last Days of Adolf Hitler, one by Hugh Trevor-Roper and the other by Anton Joachimsthaler, and expect to take part in the discussion on the basis of those two books, and the biographies of Hitler by Kershaw, Fest, and Bullock. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The simple objective was to chronologically distribute all individuals consistently, including those previously outside of the dates list due to suicide etc. Chicbyaccident (talk) 22:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Chicbyaccident, the changes made included WP:OR and wrong information. For one, you cannot state that Wilhelm Burgdorf and Hans Krebs (Wehrmacht general) "left" the bunker complex on a certain date; when they were alive, they never left the bunker. They both committed suicide in the bunker. Also, you cannot say that Hitler and Braun "left" the bunker on 30 April either, for the same reason. They both committed suicide in the bunker; and their lifeless corpses were carried out thereafter. As for the Goebbels and their children, you moved them as "leaving" the bunker complex before Wilhelm Mohnke's break-out group. That timeline is wrong for the parents and as for the Goebbels children, they were killed in the Vorbunker; they did not "leave" the bunker when they were alive. And no one knows when Heinrich Müller (Gestapo) left, either; he must remain as unknown. Kierzek (talk) 16:35, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of recent changes 

message: You took away Irmingard von Varo. That is wrong. Everybody, familiar with the matter, knows, that von Varo was there. She was seeking for shelter. In the "Musmanno-Papers" (Duquesne University) she was interviewed by Michael A. Musmanno. Von Varo was talking about the death of the Goebbels Children with Magda Goebbels. She took part at the farewell of Hitler, where E.-G. Schenk, Flegel, etc. were participants. And Von Varo fled with driver Kempka through parts of Berlin. Please write in von Varo again. Thank you!
Pfr. R. Braun  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.78.101.76 (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The purpose of a navigation template is to offer links to related articles. We don't have an article about this person, hence she doesn't get listed on the template.— Diannaa (talk) 13:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There were others seeking shelter in the upper bunker; soldiers, nurses, Hitler Youth, etc. In addition there were Hitler’s FBK SS bodyguard unit members present. However, the Template is not to include everyone that may have been present at some time, it is for navigation link to articles on people of related articles. Kierzek (talk) 13:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Irmingard von Varo

message: Why does the link to Liselotte Chervinska go to Erna Flegel? They were both nurses, but providing a link to Flegel makes it seem as though a page is available on Chervinska, which is not the case. DaffodilOcean (talk) 12:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that is how it is done herein, when a person does not rate an article of their own. She is mentioned there in a section, so the link goes there. She would never rate a stand alone article; not notable enough. Flegel, herself, barely is notable enough for one, per GNG. Kierzek (talk) 15:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liselotte Chervinska