Talk:Daniel Horowitz

message: Can anyone say why this was tagged as possible BLP/vandalism issue?
# 00:31, 17 September 2009 (hist) (diff) Daniel Horowitz ‎ (→High Profile Cases) (Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Horowitz&diff=314449479&oldid=314449017
The content that was tagged is simply
"A third defendant had pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter testified against the other two defendants, saying that Hall had recruited him while Hudson fired the gun."
And, it is sourced, doesn't seem to be inaccurate or a secret.
67.161.170.205 (talk) 00:15, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recurring Conflict on Changes 

message: Look, this is atrocious: "On January 12, 2006, one of Horowitz's clients, Susan Polk, asked to fire him as her attorney because "I have come to suspect that Horowitz may have been involved in the murder of his wife based on statements he made to me". [7]"
Susan Polk, as the article linked in [7] states, has been accused of being mentally imbalanced and possibly insane. For this to be left in the article with no statement regarding Polk's sanity is most definitely an issue where libel could be a problem. 67.10.133.121 21:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Susan Polk 

message: Daniel Horowitz is reported to have joined the defense team of Hans Reiser, a famous computer scientist who is alleged to have murdered his wife .  Would this be a notable case in Horowitz career? John Vandenberg 11:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hans Reiser case 

message: I have redirected the article on Pamela Vitale to this page, as the only suggestion of notability in that article is that Vitale is the victim of a murder. Per WP:BLP1E and WP:BIO1E, it is not currently Wikipedia's standard practice to create articles on victims of relatively non-notable crimes. If the crime itself is notable, it is common to write an article specific to the event, as for instance with :Murder of Victoria Climbié. I am, of course, perfectly willing to discuss this and, if there is disagreement, to seek further input at WP:BLPN. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection of [[:Pamela Vitale]] 

message: The section on Nieto and the Willie Green trial is essentially lies by taking everything out of context.  I have repeatedly posted and others have posted the truth only to have the malicious vandals change it.  I have obtained a copy of the Court of Appeal decision.  You will see it posted in the next day or two on sb399.com.  It makes it clear that I properly raised the claim that the prosecutor deliberately challenged African American jurors.  Fully 25% of his challenges were to African American jurors when only 8% of the jury pool was Black.  Damn right I'm going to raise this point.  He got away with it but that does not make it right.  His opening statement also referenced something along the lines of out of the streets of Oakland came darkness ... imply to me that this Black man was coming out of the "darkness" to kill a white guy.  I read the riot act on that.  When the prosecutor smirked at my client during a break and then used my clients outrage (and threats) as a way to get him executed. I told the jury what happened.  
There is more ... the matador comment and the pinyata comment & the 18 year old girl comment are truthfully addressed by me in posts that I made on Wikipedia or others made for me.  Of course these immediately get erased.
I am trying to get a copy of the appellate briefs to post.  Willie Green has the actual trial transcripts and he is in prison but I will see if I can get them.
I save my client's life.  I beat a racist attack that appealed the most base prejudices in an attempt to take a man's life.  That is what defense attorneys do.  They bring out the hidden racism, confront it and fight it.
The fact that some people want to spin this relates to greater battles that I am fighting.  These attacks are from groups that I am fighting politically and from people involved in supporting the murderer of my wife, Pamela.  These people have posted pictures of the interior, exterior and address of my house and a description of who lives there.  Now, they are trying to create a Wikipedia image that is so horrific that some angry person, some nut, somebody acts out ....
That is what is going on.
I do not have all day, everyday to deal with this.  If the Wikipedia community does not fix this, then only I will suffer the consequences.
I should add one thing.  It is interesting that someone who purports to know, claims that I did legal work not for my wife's killers family but for Kim Curiel.  That is not true.  I did the work for both and the killer's mother was my main contact.  (And I did not charge them for the work).  Who would change that?  Why?  What is their claimed basis of knowledge?  I obviously am implying a clear answer and I hope as you ponder this you will understand ...  Daniel Horowitz  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.98.36.198 (talk) 19:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about the substance of this, but the edits you made were poorly done. They removed the actual citations (you seem to have cut'n'pasted the displayed article rather than working on the source). Need to keep the actual footnotes, which are embedded in the source and become clickable links to the References list, not just the "[1]" plain text. I've reverted because it made a mess of the article. You're welcome to re-edit (and I leave it to others to address the content itself) but don't break the refs. DMacks (talk) 20:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I don't understand the accusations either. If this is Mr. Horowitz editing his own page, then surely he must realize Wikipedia content cannot just be added because he says something is valid. Also, Mr. Horowitz has publicly listed his own home for sale with 15-20 pictures of the inside of his house/property and Nancy Grace publicly announced who is in his immediate family. This is all public knowledge, some or all of which was obviously sanctioned by Mr. Horowitz. Tiburonforthree (talk), 12 September 2009 (UTC)
This "Tiburon" person has ZERO History on Wikipedia. He (actually probably She) is part of the very group that started the postings on my blog on my website sb399.com, (lies of course), Wikipedia (lies and the grossly / massively out of context statements that are essentially lies).  I posted the appellate decision on the Willie Green case and added context based upon that cited decision and the news articles.
As for my home pictures.  It is one thing for a real estate agent to post the pictures of my house as part of selling it.  It is another thing to have the girlfriends, fans and groupies of my wife's killer post these along with shots taken days after Pamela's killing from Nancy Grace.   
Then his people like "Tiburon" and others enamored with him, butcher my Wikipedia listings so that it becomes very clear that they are deliberately attempting to incite violence.
This should be a MAJOR issue on Wikipedia.  If this is tolerated and if I have to fight this alone, then what does Wikipedia stand for ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.41.217.95 (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Claims that Mr. Horowitz's address is not public aside from currently selling his home are unfounded no matter who Mr. Horowitz is falsely accusing. Here is just a very small sampling as there must be hundreds of such references on the web:
http://www.sfchronicle.us/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/22/MNG3MKN3GE5.DTL&hw=curiel&sn=024&sc=215
http://www.sfgate.info/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/23/BAGF5KNFKI1.DTL
http://fromwhisperstor.6.forumer.com/a/scott-dyeleski-murder-of-pamela-vitale-trial-71706life_post1885-15.html
http://www.cbs5.com/local/Dyleski.Pamela.Vitale.2.440525.html
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is.../ai_n16652985/
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-149869435.html
http://www.news.findlaw.com/court_tv/s/.../22aug2006174850.html 
http://www.smartfellowspress.com/_Iago2005/_1005/00000257.htm
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/A115725.DOC
http://www.socialissues.wiseto.com/Articles/149878871/?print
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/util/prestitialShell?ad=3&goback=http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&id=4469340
http://www.jaygaskill.com/Vitalehorowitzdeath.htm Tiburonforthree (talk) 03:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nieto/Willie Green trial context 

message: The petition exhibits include original law enforcement interviews with Pamela Vitale's sister, Tammy Hill, who claimed there were incidents of rage and domestic violence during their marriage along with the couple experiencing financial problems.
This part is untrue.  As a close friend of the couple, I know neither was the case and so this information is downright devastating and hurtful to Daniel Horowitz.
Please remove.
Horseofcourse66 (talk) 02:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the paragraph in question - see below. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Horseofcourse66, 26 August 2011 

message: The ,most recent edit is from a serial attacker of Daniel Horowitz.  The claims are posted as fact when they come from the killer of his wife and from his attorney.  Local newscasts have the attorneys back tracking from their claim and there is no evidence to support.  It is impossible to post corrections but somehow the person was able to post.  
99.117.55.54 (talk) 02:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the paragraph in question as synthesis, a violation of WP:NPOV etc. Can I ask that any reverts etc be discussed here first. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 99.117.55.54, 26 August 2011 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel Horowitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716065127/http://www.nlada.org/DMS/Documents/1205440056.43/A_NEWS07 to http://www.nlada.org/DMS/Documents/1205440056.43/A_NEWS07
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312083621/http://easyreader.hermosawave.net/news2002/storypage.asp?StoryID=20027541&IssuePath=news2005%2F1020%2F to http://easyreader.hermosawave.net/news2002/storypage.asp?StoryID=20027541&IssuePath=news2005%2F1020%2F
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Where is the empirical evidence Dyleski murdered Pamela, at the age of 16? I keep looking into Pamela's murder, and it is starting to look more like a hired hit for the purpose of possibly intimidating and silencing one of the most successful and influential Defense Attorney's, in the nation. I think he may have upset someone associated with either the FBI or some sort of organized crime syndicate. Were Scott Dyleskis fingerprints or DNA found at Pamela Vitale's residence? The wife of Dan Horowitz...was there a high profile case he had coming up that certain individuals didn't want him to defend, or refuse to defend? Did he say something starkly offensive on National TV, upset someone who despises him and how he may have helped someone dangerous get away with high crimes and murder?
Feel free to comment and share. I am a Private Investigator, and this this is indeed a very odd situation. 2601:404:C501:BE70:ACC1:E1C3:12E5:D5D3 (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scott Dyleski and Pamela Vitale 

message: Subject of this BLP has been commenting on the article talk page for over a decade. Numerous editors have expressed concern about possible sockpuppet accounts of BLP, see talk FeralOink (talk) 07:20, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (July 2023)