Talk:Millstream Brewing

message: I like how this reads nothing like an encyclopedia article and everything like advertising copy.  Way to make wikipedia an ad agency mouthpice, and your own work totally ephemeral and indefensible.  
I live near the Amanas and think Millstream really does make splendid stuff (especially the root beer), so I won't challenge this article myself.  Blatant bias on my part.  But this article will collapse like a house of cards before a serious NPOV challenge.  Say from a competitor's ad agency?
Word of advice to the authors, if you're still watching this page:  make it neutral or lose it.
216.137.71.74 17:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: :Image:MillstreamCreamSoda.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MillstreamCreamSoda.png

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: official site. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed