Talk:Health Services Union

message: :Image:Hsulogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hsulogo.jpg

message: Given the amount of attention this otherwise minor union has received in the past three years, it seems to me that we really should look at providing a more complete timeline of the scandal, identifying the major players and so on. The internal affairs of the HSU appear to be rather complex and changeable over the years and people are going to be coming here for information about what's going on. I'm actually surprised that we haven't covered this previously. I think (as I indicated at Talk:Craig Thomson (politician) that we should have an appropriately titled article, and I'm open to suggestions. HSU scandal, perhaps? --Pete (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Given any individual is innocent until proven guilty, publishing unsubstantiated allegations, such as those I've seen against Craig Thomson (politician), may render the author libel. It is unsurprising that a timeline of the allegations has not been published, as the relevant pages in Wikipedia seem to be heavily bias to support those making the 'unsubstantiated' allegations. There are currently allegations raised against Kathy Jackson (Kathy Koukouvaos), concerning her partner being a prominent individual with Fair Work Australia, yet none of this is evident from the Wikipedia entries. There's no mention of her outlandish salary, and unbelievable denials of known circumstances concerning other HSU officials. Wikipedia is being abused, the standard has dropped remarkably in a few years, with so many bias entries remaining online.Gymboot (talk) 16:55, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scandal 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Health Services Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/25770688/ex-mp-craig-thomson-to-learn-his-fate/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050625080457/http://www.actu.asn.au/ to http://www.actu.asn.au/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified