Talk:Monteverde

message: I came here due to a plea posted on Wikipedia:Third opinion. In my opinion, the bank raid is a notable enough event to warrant inclusion in the article, it isn't late-breaking news, and the version as written (right now) contains acceptably neutral language.  The only problem I see is the quotation at the end of the paragraph.  Quotations must be cited. Fix that please, or delete the quotation. -Amatulic 22:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: mmm, the quotation is from the second source, maybe moving the citation to the end of the sentence? --T0rek 01:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion

message: Ecotourism is mentioned several times in this article but it doesn't really give any information about it. How many people go there? What are the impacts? How successful is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.211.117 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecotourism 

message: link added I believe the butterfly garden link would help know more about Monteverde sorry, first time here Trender (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am deleting this link. Please read carefully Wikipedia:External links. Commercial travel and tourism sites shouldn't be in Wikipedia articles, because there are so many of them, and highlighting one of them amounts to advertising. Also, if you are associated with the site, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before adding any more links. Thanks. -Amatulić (talk) 23:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: Is that enough info? Good bank coverage, prehistory, agriculture, improved demographics, tourism...can we unflag this page now? AdrianMasters (talk) 12:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over? 

message: An image used in this article, File:Monteverde entrance.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Monteverde entrance.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Monteverde entrance.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: The history section starts off with a claim that Clovis Indians farmed there.  The Clovis culture was  a hunting-gathering culture that did not farm.  I tried to check the citation, which seems to refer to p. 1 of the cited book.  I don't have access to the book itself, but in both Google books and Amazon, p. 1 is either absent or "intentionally left blank," with no indication of a discussion of prehistoric occupation. A cursory search of the Internet did not turn up any Clovis reference for Monteverde, Costa Rica. Perhaps this is a mistaken interpretation of the famous site in Chile. If there are no objections with a reasonable amount of time, I will remove the Clovis sentence.Kdammers (talk) 12:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: As this article deals mostly with history and activities of the Monte Verde district of Puntarenas canton, I added information about the district and also used the official name for it (Monte Verde) according to División Territorial Administrativa and added a link to the biological reserve on top for disambiguation purposes.  And due to Wikipedia policy of using the popular name, I decided to keep Monteverde article title instead of moving it to Monte Verde, Puntarenas. 
However I had to revert some edits changing the Monte Verde text to Monteverde. If the difference between the district and the biological reserve isn't clear, maybe the Monte Verde, Puntarenas should be created instead? --Roqz (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monte Verde (district) and Monteverde (biological reserve)