Talk:Salah Choudhury

message: This does not include the official reason why Bangladesh government is charging him for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.142.75 (talk • contribs) 
*Mr Choudhury was convicted "on charge of smuggling information out of the country and was awarded a three-month term in the case" and "in February 2015, Mr Choudhury was convicted for four years on charge of revolt against Bangladesh government(sedition)". 
*It mentions the charges of sedition, treason, blasphemy and espionage. Stop adding uncited material. Andjam 09:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is biased

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Sdsouza 20:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: 1. The New York Times, Risk of Journalism in Bangladesh <ref: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E05E6DF123CF937A25751C1A9659C8B63>
2. Incubating ultra radicalism <ref: http://www.mideastweb.org/salah01.htm>
3. The Wall Street Journal, The Americas <ref: http://www.opinionjournal.com/wsj/?id=110009088>
4. The Australian, No tolerance for love and mercy in Bangladesh <ref: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20758306-32522,00.html>
5. Canada Free Press, The Moslem Hero of Moderation <ref: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2499>
6. American Chronicle, Anti Semitic People in Associated Press <ref: http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/60675>
7. Pakistan Daily, Media under attack in Bangladesh <ref: http://www.daily.pk/world/asia/82-asia/3358-media-under-attack-in-bangladesh.html>
8. The New Nation, Congressional briefing on Bangladesh <ref: http://nation.ittefaq.com/issues/2008/05/23/news0493.htm>
9. Voice of America, Freedom of speech in South Asia <ref: http://www.voanews.com/uspolicy/archive/2007-08/2007-08-14-voa2.cfm?CFID=1329325&CFTOKEN=23583971>
10. Berliner Zeitung, Der Andere Moslem <ref: http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/spezial/dossiers/wie_soll_ich_leben/75561/index.php>
11. The Wall Street Journal, Bangladesh on trial <ref: http://www.interfaithstrength.com/images/WSJ.html>  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scoopnews (talk • contribs) 03:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Link 

message: The name of the Airport in which Salah was arrested is stated, "Shahjalal Int'l Airport". The newspaper quoted also is quoted to say "Shahjalal Int'l Airport). Interesting to note here is that the airport was renamed such only in 2010 and the name Zia Int'l Airport existed in 2003, during the time of the arrest. The author of the article also fiddled with the actual quote to mention "Shahjalal" instead of the original article from the newspaper The Daily Star where it says "Zia" (just follow the citation given).
It seems like the author of the article has fiddled with evidence on purpose, and hence the authenticity of the article is questionable.
Ratibgreat (talk) 11:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Shahjalal vs Zia - Questionable authenticity

message: I have added controversy section regarding Salah Choudhury but I'm not sure if the source I used is best source for it. But the NYPD is charging Salah Udin Choudhury for Grand Larceny via fraud since he's cheated on one of my friend and another female supporter. Complaints have also been made on March 25, 2011 to the Manhattan District Attorney. I'll add this with more source to come when the story appears on the media. Please forgive me if this is not reliable source and feel free to discuss with me about Salah Udin Choudhury --74.108.85.251 (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unreliable sources are not allowed in biographies of living persons. Marokwitz (talk) 08:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 

message: Thank you, , for making an effort at cleanup. Many of your edits have been helpful, but others veer towards "don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point" territory.
*  removed two paragraphs with the vague explanation "- citation". The sourced content was merged here in this edit by an uninvolved editor as the result of consensus at this deletion discussion. It should not be removed unless consensus has changed.
*  removed content with the explanation "there is no American Jewish Committee and Wikipedia highlighted the link as 'not reliable'." On the contrary, there certainly is an American Jewish Committee (AJC). Do not act on highlights applied by script User:Headbomb/unreliable unless you understand what it is showing you. Context matters. A press release by AJC is not independent of AJC and naturally tends to be biased in favor of AJC. That doesn't mean it is unreliable for all things. Like other self-published sources, it can be a reliable source for information about their own publicly stated position. The text of the press release plainly supports the statement that the AJC "showed support for Choudhury and his ideals". You've removed this before and been reverted. Knock it off.
*  removed content with the explanation "citation to homepage that doesn't mention even, is not a citation at all". The citation was broken, but it took me less than two minutes to fix it. You've done something similar several times with other references here, and been reverted. If you can't repair a citation, tag it and leave it for an editor with greater resources or expertise.
*  is unfathomable. Your comment about the UNHCR has nothing to do with The Times of Israel. Perhaps you are just confused, but the edit is disruptive.
Before turning to cleanup, you twice tried to get this article deleted. No one agreed with you. From the above examples, it appears that your feelings about the subject may be strong, and you may be having difficulty being objective. I encourage you to take a break from this topic. You don't need to take sole responsibility for this article, and there are plenty of other articles in need of improvement that you could work on. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:56, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive edits 

message: Terrorist Aug 21 Grenade Attack, https://www.thedailystar.net/news-detail-119990  Sajalony (talk) 14:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  salah uddin shoaib choudhury and Aug 21 Grenade Attack