lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leros

message: In this article one can read:
"Under the watchful eye of Mussolini, a new town, Portolago, was created in the 1930s, with its now infamous Italian Rationalist art-deco architecture and streets wide enough for military parading. The Greeks later renamed it Lakki."
Yet in International style (architecture) I found:
"The town of Portolago (now Lakki) in the Greek Dodecanese island of Leros represents some of the most interesting urban planning from the fascist regime in the Dodecanese; an extraordinary examplee of city takeover in the International style known as Italian rationalist. The symbolism of the shapes is reflected with exemplary effectiveness in the buildings of Lakki: the administration building, the metaphysical tower of the market, the cinema-theatre, the Hotel Roma (now Hotel Leros), the church of Saint Francisco and the hospital are fine examples of the style."
Is the first one an objective point of view?
: I agree totally with the critic above. The Writer of this article apparently has no idea about modern Architecture. I don't know who in 2006 can still judge the italian rationalism as "infamous": to me this is just a POV, and it should therefore be canceled from the article. alex2006 10:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please can you do something about blocking someone or block the article so it can be change only from the people that have work on it abecause a vandal every day deletes all the external links from informative websites of the island.Thank you Pireotis 07:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: see User_talk:Pireotis Spamming Leros--Hu12 09:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:SPAM|Spam policy]] & [[WP:EL|External links policy]] 

message: Why isn't the Mental Hospital of Leros mentioned in the article? The hospital is well-known due to the torturing of patients there during thr 80s. Mitsos 11:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hallo, this is not censorship: you have just to cite the source of your information. This is written in the comment of the Undoing action. Regards, Alex2006 (talk) 05:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leros Mental Institution 
Talk:Workgroup

message: Here are some examples--which I think work well enough with the existing page Working group, so I've also listed them there.
Workgroup is often used as an adjective (as in "workgroup meeting") but can also be found as a noun. Savannah River Site Health Effects Subcommittee (SRSHES) Meeting gives examples of both uses. For groups formally called workgroups see 
* Reactor Facility Decommissioning Workgroup
"The Community Workgroup for the decommissioning of the closed Reactor Facility at NASA Glenn Research Center's Plum Brook Station will meet on Tuesday, January 18, from 7-9 p.m. in the Perkins High School cafeteria, located at 3714 Campbell Street in Perkins Township."
* Pacific Northwest Native Freshwater Mussel Workgroup
I believe that "workgroup" is also used as a more informal term for a collaborative group working closely together. 
Please add information to Working group if you feel it is appropriate, or, if you feel the meaning is different, create a new page for  Workgroup (Group of people). Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples of [[Workgroup (Group of people)]] 

message: I feel that there should at least be a differentiation between "Workgroup" as in the Setting in windows versus "Workgroup" as in Peer to peer networking.  Maybe a disambiguation page?  While Yes, when you use workgroups in windows networking it is technically a serverless form of LAN peer to peer networking as compared to using the LAN "domain" setting in windows networking which needs a server, neither the article that workgroup redirects to (computer networking) nor the "Peer to Peer Networking" article talk about this at all. any thoughts? or am I just looking in the wrong place? PeteThornbury 06:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about "Workgroup" in reference to MS Windows Networking?
Talk:Bible Study Fellowship

message: The following comment was pasted onto the bottom of the article, it is not my writing - I simply relocated it:
:As a current BSF discussion leader in Southern California, I can say that you have given an accurate portrayal of this organization. Many churches would do well to look at how: BSF selects and trains its leaders, promotes spiritual growth among its leaders and  group members, and how a body of believers unified by the power of the Holy Spirit can work and grow together and support one another to the glory of God. 
:I also have some issues with other aspects of the program, but all in all it  has been a wonderful avenue for myself and others to grow in their knowledge of His Word and to draw closer to Him.
Discuss! Oliver Keenan 15:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relocated comment

message: Please get some references for this otherwise pretty good article BQZip01 07:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Please use referenced and reliable sources when adding information to this section (or any section).  I've deleted the personal anecdotes and feelings of a previous editor, but am not passing judgment on their veracity --Esquire880 (talk) 00:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctrinal position 

message: I am proposing removal of the reference to the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, which although referenced, does not appear relevant to BSF's history.  I'm proposing same for the reference to KYB in Australia. --Esquire880 (talk) 00:13, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Wikipedia talk:List of redirects from misspellings

message: Do we correct misspellings in user space and user talk space? Cricketgirl 14:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, we do not.  Only mainspace misspellings since they affect the quality of the encyclopedia.--Xnuala (talk) 16:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Links in User space

message: Is this a useful redirect? I imagine it should be deleted. Equinox ◑ 15:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[Bates colelge]]" -> [[Bates College]]
Talk:Disciples of the New Church

message: Is the article "The" part of the proper name?  If not, the article needs to be moved to "New Church."  --ElKevbo 15:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in the wrestling section because you opted to create an article in an existing namespace rather than starting a new article. The article on the religious movement is now at The New Church; in future, please create a new article rather than overwriting an existing article. ElKevbo, your 'discussion' has been moved to Talk:The New Church; please continue it there. McPhail 22:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  THE new Church?
Talk:Edward H. East

message: It is disputed by some if East was ever actually governor of Tennessee as he was appointed to the position of Secretary of State by the Union occupation government, not the General Assembly, which had ceased to meet.  It seems problematic as to whether he was ever actually inaugurated, and this explains his absence from the Blue Book and his tenure's apparent failure to be included in the official enumberation of governorships.  His inclusion as a governor of Tennessee seems to have been done on the basis of the theory that someone had to have been in charge during that period, and, as the highest remaining state official, that person had to have been East.  Rlquall 15:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's clear he was never actually governor, he just carried out the duties of governor.  I suppose it's similar to when Dan Quayle was "president" for a day or two in the early 1990s when the first Bush had to have surgery.  I have kept the term "acting governor," but I used the lower case (generic) term, and I have changed the piping from acting governor to acting (law), the latter being more indicative of East's role.  Bms4880 (talk) 15:47, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andante ticket

message: This page is to describe the technology, not the ticketing prices or zoning (for that, refer to the page on the Metro do Porto).
Since this was the first major roll-out of the low-cost tickets, for historical reasons I believe an article describing the technology in more detail is interesting. It is largely incomplete as it is, but I'll keep adding to it as time permits.
--JoaoCastro 15:55, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *I want more information of this claim. And what's the difference between Andante and other contactless electronic fare collection systems especially for the word "fully". -- Sameboat 12:35, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Hong Kong's Octopus Card was launched in 1997 and - at least according to the article on Octopus - the old paper season tickets were made obsolete within months. Quickly scanning through that article I didn't find out whether single journeys were converted to Octopus in similar timescale. In any case, the claim what Adelante was the world's first fully contactless system is not referenced. nordstar 16:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  World's first fully contactless mass transit ticketing system? 
Talk:Grease monkey

message: Can anyone provide a citation on the racist use of the term?  I think maybe that's the result of confusing "grease monkey" with "greaser".  I searched throuh a bunch of dictionaries, and MSN Encarta is the only dictionary that claims "grease monkey" is insulting:
:an offensive term for a mechanic, especially one who works on motor vehicles or aircraft  ( slang insult  ) 
The Encarta defintion of "greaser", however, is censored, and includes the following:
:3. U.S.   ( taboo offensive  )  Same as  greaseball (sense 2) 
And from the similarly censored "greaseball":
:2. U.S. taboo term: a highly offensive term for somebody of Mediterranean or Latin American, especially Mexican, origin  ( taboo  ) ( slang  ) 
I'm going to yank the racist meaning from the article; feel free to put it back if verification can be found of that use.  scot 15:55, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist? 

message: This page is a mere dictionary definition (something which Wikipedia is not).  It explains the meaning and alleged eytmologies of a slang expression and mentions some possibly-related phrases.  While there is some interesting content here, I can't find any encyclopedic content on this page.  Nothing here rises past what I would expect to read in a truly great unabridged dictionary.  The definitions and usage discussions belong over in Wiktionary where folks with the right skills, interests and lexical tools can more easily sort out the meanings and origins.
Options to fix the page here include:
# Expand the page with encyclopedic content - that is, content that goes well beyond the merely lexical.
# Redirect the page to a more general page on the appropriate sub-genre of slang.
# Replace the current contents with a soft-redirect to Wiktionary (usually done using the  template).
# Cut the lexical content down to the amount that would be appropriate at the top of a disambiguation page.
Given the other potential meanings of the link, I'm implementing option 4 for now.  Rossami (talk) 23:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand, merge or redirect 

message: The grease discussion above is one thing, but don't forget about the monkey part, too.  What's its etymology?  Both are probably not so flattering.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.108.81.149 (talk) 01:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoever writes the entry for grease monkey aka mechanic slang
Talk:Margaret, Countess of Mar

message: This article title is controversial. One cannot apply numbering system like this to the Earldoms/Mormaerdoms of this period, when the number is simply not known. So Margaret of Mar, or Margaret, Countess of Mar, are the only appropriate titles. - Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 15:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 10th?
Talk:Korea Sogyong Trading

message: Dear Fellow Wikipedia Editors:
I understand the concern that articles about North Korea are currently stub articles and I am taking appropriate action to solve the problem.
North Korea is a secretive state, some information about govenrment officials, companies, and events is known from official North Korean media, other information has been reported in foreign media. So, any North Korean article will likely be stub class until a major change in the government.
I am trying to use libary research, instead of just Google, to expand the encyopledia about a largly unknown country. I have found a source to expand the the North Korean articles at the Global Resources Center at the Gelman Library at George Washington University libaray. If someone makes the paper newspaper in DPRK, then that person is noteworthy.
For example, much of the information is from unnamed south korean analysts reported in western news sources. Even , Ri Sol-ju  the wife of Kim Jong-un , is lacking definative information because the DPRK sources are scant. 
Please give editors time to flesh out the articles. I am seeking consensus to increase understanding that stub articles about North Korea my be all that is possible. Please discuss. Geraldshields11 (talk) 23:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Western Hills High School (Cincinnati, Ohio)

message: I understand she dropped out of Our Lady of Angels at 16 to join show biz. A 1939 yearbook I have shows no mention of her, it
covers grades seven thru twelve.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.62.134 (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Doris Day?

message: Does anyone know if the school still uses the building designed for it by architect Frederick W. Garber circa 1930? A photo would be great. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: School building
Talk:Geometric hashing

message: the url 26 04 2006 geometric Hashing an overview is broken
BTW, reading this, I realize, wikipedia would be soooooo much better if people didn't use
their own made up (unsearchable) words to describe concepts, because it, in effect,
makes the text unreadable or useless.. 
Example given: "on-line", what's does it mean here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.150.60 (talk) 14:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Orion Corporation (South Korean company)

message: I took out the following line: It is historically an old brand popular for inventing Choco Pie. , as the "Choco Pie" is (as is mentioned in the Wiki page on Choco Pie) similar to the American "Wagon Wheel" (and therefore its "invention" is not really an invention). I suppose a parallel would be claiming that Nathan's in Brooklyn "invented" the Frankfurter rather than introducing the food from an outside source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Huanohk (talk • contribs) 13:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choco Pie / Wagon Wheel edit
Talk:Oriental Brewery

message: I have never seen OB PAle Ale available in south korea the two years i've been here.  Where is it sold?  Is it export only?
===Labatt===
Can someone explain why the labelling on OB is exactly like Labatt Blue? It's not just coincidental, but is it old-fashioned Korean copyright infringement, or do the two companies share some kind of connection? —Muckapedia
===OB and Labatt===
This is just my opinion but both labels are owned by Belgian-based InBev.
===InBev Takeover of Anheuser Busch===
I removed the statement from the intro that said OB produces Budweiser. As of 25 June InBev has not purchased AB.  --Papa sausage (talk) 08:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the statement from the intro that said OB produces Budweiser. As of 25 June InBev has not purchased AB.  --Papa sausage (talk) 08:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: InBev Takeover of Anheuser Busch

message: I remember distinctly drinking a beer called "Dry" all the time when I lived in South Korea in the early 90's.  I thought it was a brand owned by OB, but I didn't see it listed.  Can anyone confirm?  Also, does OB not export?  Even when flying on Korean Airlines to South Korea the flight attendants looked at me strange when I asked for an OB or Dry beer, this was as recently as June 2010.173.19.104.130 (talk) 22:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: OB Brands
Talk:OGN (TV channel)

message: What does "the most authorized" mean? Authorized by whom, and in what sense? Ormiss 11:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This content is a redundant stub and should be merged to Starleague (Ongamenet).--Rfsmit (talk) 16:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ongamenet also produces original content other than organizing competitive gaming matches. Akkies (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: TV station vs starcraft tournament: quite different. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 19:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Those two sections should not be merged. Because, as Kuebie wrote above, Ongamenet produces other game-related programs such as Tekken tag tournament or Counter Strike. Starcraft is just one of the programs they broadcast. Actually, Ongamenet is trying to diversify the genre of programs because the popularity of Starcraft is fading away in Korea.--Chotongfui (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Lotte Wellfood

message: Hi! Please check the article and find ways to add more sources. Large paragraphs that are unsourced in the "History" section need to be looked at and be provided with citations within the terms of Wikipedia WP:COPYVIO. Thank you.
 (talk) 07:06, 09 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced references
Talk:Hyundai Rotem

message: I decided to delete Manila Line-2 from the list of light rail. 
Line-2 is a heavy rail system.
Themanilaxperience (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manila Line-2 omitted
Talk:Samsung Display

message: The "90,000 panel monthly capacity" sounds small, considering the global sales of Samsung and Sony. Fujitsu-Siemensis also using S-LCD panels in their Myrica line; I would estimate that they alone may sell over 90,000 panels a month (in differents sizes). It seems more likely the 90,000 figure refers to the number of 2,200 mm × 2,500 mm substrates produced. -- Petri Krohn 13:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panels or substrates? 

message: AFAIK there are exactly three manufacturers of LCD panels worldwide and S-LCD is one of them. Compared to the number of car manufacturers this is noteworthy! User:ScotXWt@lk 16:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not correct. At least, Japan Display Inc. is one more manufacturer. Sharp has been acquired by Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision Industry, Taiwan)--BBCLCD (talk) 10:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  worldwide only 3 manufacturers of LCD panels 

message: First, Samsung Electronics bought out Sony's stake in S-LCD as seen in https://www.engadget.com/2012-07-02-samsung-merges-s-lcd-and-mobile-display-units-under-samsung-disp.html, and also merged its mobile display unit into S-LCD to form Samsung Display. Second, Samsung Display quit making LCDs and is all OLED now according to https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1662535408 . I am too busy to edit and move this article right now. Jesse Viviano (talk) 01:53, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies
Talk:Shinsegae

message: "*Emart.com is a US-based online shopping comparison site.  No relation to Shinsegae" Is this advertising? --Gbleem 09:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok 211.178.161.46 (talk) 21:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising?
Talk:ESA (company)

message: I'm removing the link to the english Softmax website, as it is completely unrelated to the Korean software developer. --Sqrfrk 07:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. TroyToonTrotStudios (talk) 09:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English site...
Talk:Sonokong

message: It's odd that giant toy company Young Industry is a red link.  We may be spelling it wrong or not have an article on it but I'm suspicious, even though its been in the article a long time.  RJFJR (talk) 16:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Anime
Hikaru no Go (with TV Tokyo) 
製作 - テレビ東京、電通、ぴえろ 
Hikarian (Korean name is Mega Train) 
制作協力 - アーミックデザインオフィス、OGGI、協和広告、テレビクリエイションジャパン 
制作 - 東京キッズ 
製作 - テレビ東京、TOMY 
The Brave Fighter of Legend Da-Garn 
製作:名古屋テレビ、東急エージェンシー、サンライズ 
GaoGaiGar 
製作：名古屋テレビ、東急エージェンシー、サンライズ 
They did not do the production of ANIME. It might be only a subcontract of the toy. 60.40.10.140 (talk) 03:20, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  False information. Sonokong doesn't produce the ANIME.
Talk:Bad Acid Trip

message: What happened to the version of this page that I made, before someone filled it with a C&P of the text from their site? Foolish Child 16:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the history log. --Chodorkovskiy (talk) 06:50, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have already restored it. (The page was previously subject to a VfD, but it is not clear whether it applies to this version, so a new vote should be held sooner or later.) - Mike Rosoft 10:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:YTN

message: I'm proud to stand as a viewer of the YTN, however, I think the image of YTN should be changed. Since 2005(probably, during the beginning of Roh Moo-hyun's administration), circle-line which covered the initial of YTN(Capital Letter) has been scrapped. Does anyone can help? or can I add from their official homepage? Peterhansen2032, August 9, 2007 05:45 GMT
: Uploaded the current logo - it is under fair use and low resolution so shouldn't be a problem. Nuyos (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Saint Galdino

message: He is the only Saint Galdino, so I believe the title should be simply Saint Galdino, as in other Wikis. 213.245.147.96 (talk) 16:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving or article
Talk:Technopaganism

message: I've expanded this entry a bit. I'd love to see more data and actual citations. Blade 16:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. However, I do not believe you exist. So I guess we are even. Blade (talk) 02:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Wait, what? If someone who doesn't exist types something, does he not exist? Honestly... However, you must see that what he means by asking that question is that he thinks it sounds so (exuse me for not bothering to find a maybe less insulting word) odd, that he wonders how anyone could believe this. Of course someone believes this, if it has it's own article on wikipedia and a own SIG, somebody must believe this, since (exucuse me once again) wasting so much time on something you don't believe in would be utterly worthless. 81.235.40.42 (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Burton M. Cross

message: Based on this article and the Nathaniel Haskell article, Cross was actually governor of Maine for two differnent stints.  Shouldn't the template reflect this?  It shows Haskell's one-day "term".  Also, constitutionally, was he Acting Governor the first time or merely Governor?Rlquall 16:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Isaac Asimov

message: To me, it does not make much sense to have Isaac Asimov be a subcategory in all of these other categories.  Looking at naturalized citizens, for example, I see the Isaac Asimov subcategory, and then hundreds of individuals.  Asimov should be no different.  Unless there is a compelling reasonto not do so, I will redirect these category links to the personal article itself. Garrettcobb 16:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gordie Sampson

message: "Silky"?
Really?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.214.15 (talk) 20:54, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice type