Talk:Presidential dollar coins

message: True or false: the coins in this act will include pictures of all the Presidents from Washington to Nixon and Reagan. 66.245.127.112 23:44, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I've heard, it will be all presidents, including those that are currently alive, such as the Bushes.  It's thus quite likely that it will break the custom of only dead people on the money.  I don't have references for this, though, so it shouldn't be added unless it can be verified or discredited Nik42 22:57, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm looking right now at the text of the bill, and it says all $1 coins issued on and after January 1, 2006, shall have a design on the obverse selected in accordance with paragraph (2)(B), which is emblematic of a deceased former President of the United States, and a design on the reverse selected in accordance with paragraph (2)(A). (emphasis mine)  So, it looks like living former Presidents will not, in fact, be on the coins  Nik42 07:47, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: By law, a person must be dead for at least two years before his/her image can be placed on U.S. coinage.B.Wind 22:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reference for that? This might preclude presidential widows from getting coins together with their deceased husbands, contradicting what is currently said in the article. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 18:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any info on what the George Washington dollar that will be the first of the dollars in this sequence will look like?? Feel free to put any info, including whether it is silver or gold, in your list. Georgia guy 22:48, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: George Washington dollar

message: What color will the coin be? 71.199.123.24 07:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What color?

message: The day I gave away a sacagawea dollar thinking it was a quarter is the day I stopped using them. They really need to differentiate them more. And considering the first one will have George Washingtons portrait on it...
:I dont know how you could have done it, since theyre different colors. Assuming the rpesidentital cards will also be gold, there shouldnt be a problem. Also, dont forget to sign your comments. Jamesinclair 05:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention having a smooth edge and a very different design, plus being noticeably larger. Nik42 08:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're quite golden and impossible to mistake for a quarter if you're not legally blind.   70.61.22.110 21:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They're also very hard to mistake if you are blind, as the blind are taught to recognize coins by their size, shape, and whether or not the edge is smooth.--Ibagli (Talk) 17:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I hope it doesn't look like a quarter

message: I'm not too familiar with editing coin pages, so here's a launching point to update. Zz414 14:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image release

message: I'm not sure the page rename from Presidential $1 Coin Act of 2005 to Presidential $1 Coin Program was a good idea.  The $1 Coin Program was only one of the programs to be initiated by the $1 Coin Act.  The other programs are listed lower on the page, but they're now out of place there.  Plus, the law is still called the Presidential $1 Coin Act of 2005, regardless of what the program is called, so the intro will have to be fixed even if the page is left where it is currently. Jwolfe 05:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The page is about the "Program," but still has components of the First Spouse Program, the Lincoln Penny, and other mintage changes.  I think renaming the article was a bad move, unless someone's going to create articles for all the other sub-programs right now. --Zz414 14:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I say that the question "What year is it an act of??" sounds a little too trivial. Georgia guy 21:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page rename

message: the metallic content needs to be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.53.23.58 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 26 February 2007
:I think the coin is mostly made up of a copper nickel clad mixture (as has been since '65) and a bit of manganese for the color. - Thanks, Hoshie 19:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you source exact percentages and put it in the article? Cburnett 20:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's written in Dollar (United States coin). --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 00:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The table of presidential spouses shows Alice Paul right behind Mrs. Garfield.  While Alice Paul was an admirable and admired woman, President Arthur was a widower, like Presidents Jefferson and Jackson, so I presume this intrusion is an act of vandalism.  Does anyone know otherwise? J S Ayer 04:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not vandalism.  The Act itself specifically requires a coin for Alice Paul for Arthur's term. See  Jwolfe 11:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a reference in the article. Cburnett 18:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This bill appears to have been put together like the budget resolutions.  A little from here, a little from there, until all the interest groups are satisfied -- then, don't disestablish the dollar bill, so it's all for collectors, anyway. Coemgenus 18:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The way it was written it sounded as if Paul was in a relationship with Arthur, and functioned as de facto Firat Lady but lacked official status.  Of course nothing like that is true.  So I rewrote it to make it clear that she had no relationship with him whatsoever, and has simply been jammed into a convenient empty slot on the grounds that she was born during that interregnum.  -- Zsero 04:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alice Paul?

message: (This issue appears RESOLVED, as Godless dollar redirects to this article.)
===Support===
* Support The so called Godless dollar is an error of the Presidential $1. Such a small niche doesn't deserve its own article. Imagine if every error coin/note have its own article. The name "godless dollar", which is made up by some reporters in a day, is probably not suitable for an article title anyway. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 16:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Godless dollar]]

message: * Support The so called Godless dollar is an error of the Presidential $1. Such a small niche doesn't deserve its own article. Imagine if every error coin/note have its own article. The name "godless dollar", which is made up by some reporters in a day, is probably not suitable for an article title anyway. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 16:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: I see the images have been deleted from commons (I believe because they were unsourced).  If anyone has the time and motivation the images can be downloaded at http://www.usmint.gov/pressroom/index.cfm?action=photo#2007Spouse. Cburnett 22:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image links fixed.  I presume the link will still be valid for future coin images. Cburnett 16:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spouse images

message: Will they be put into circulation as the Presidential coins are, or they only going to be collectors' proofs? Since the article doesn't make this clear, it should be addressed. YankeeDoodle14 23:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't able to find an answer on the Mint web site, but since they are 24-karat gold, I would imagine that they will be handled like other bullion coins.  If that's the case, then neither of your suggested options would apply.  They would be sold to wholesalers based on their precious metal content.  Jwolfe 07:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First Spouse

message: I just got a few of these in change.  It's hard to resist the temptation to add a "see also" to Chuck E Cheese!  --Reuben 00:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just got one

message: Is there any indication yet that circulation of $1 coins has gone up since this program has started, as the treasury intended? YankeeDoodle14 22:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In my neck of the woods, no. My local Books-A-Million keeps them in the drawer. I asked an employee and he told me their register was full of the Prexibux (a nickname for the series) that no one used. He couldn't understand it. In any case, this is just one experence; i'm pretty sure the Mint would spin it differently. - Thanks, Hoshie 10:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

text: When I travel to NYC I do see them being used quite often. The ticket machines get them to the people and the people use them. If more cashiers handed them out, people would use them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.40.36 (talk) 05:43, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Working?

message: The US Mint Policy allows image downloads from the Pressroom, so long as the tagline 2007 Presidential $1 Coin image from the United States Mint is included on all image pages. So why do :File:George Washigton Presidential $1 Coin obverse.png, :File:John Adams Presidential $1 Coin obverse.png, :File:Thomas Jefferson Presidential $1 Coin obverse.png, and :File:James Madison Presidential $1 Coin obverse.png don't have this tagline, seeing the source is, the United States Mint Pressroom? --293.xx.xxx.xx 12:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images don't have proper taglines

message: This article relates that "Several mothers who have lost children at war in Iraq... One of them, Elaine Johnson, recounted a meeting that she had with President Bush in which he gave her a presidential coin and told her and five other families: 'Don’t go sell it on eBay.'" What presidential coin would this have been? Ewlyahoocom 05:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Possible one of these? https://catalog.usmint.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10001&storeId=10001&productId=10752&langId=-1&parent_category_rn=10132 Psu256 13:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bush to mother: Don't sell on eBay

message: With a legal value of $10 but made of 1/2 ounce of gold (~$650/ounce) I imagine these are not intended for daily use and probably not purchasable at banks.  Can anyone confirm a purchase price (it would seem to be a blunder to sell them for $10) or confirm these are collector's items?  Cburnett 16:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the Mint's website and it seems that the first spouse coins will sell like any other bullion. That is sold at or near the current rate of gold. The face value is meanleless when it comes to bullion. See the Mint's site here. - Thanks, Hoshie 10:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured as much but needed something solid to confirm it.  A list price in the $400s indeed confirms it.  Thanks.  Cburnett 00:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It took me 35 minutes to get through on the mint's website when they went on sale today. Ugh. Worse than Ticketmaster before the Internet. Psu256 19:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Acquiring first spouse coins

message: The 2008 designs are up on the U.S. Mint web site, if anyone has time and inclination to add them to the page. Jwolfe (talk) 15:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 Designs

message: Someone just added that in 12/2007 the "In God We Trust" was moved from the edge to the obverse or reverse.  I added  as I find it dubious but can't assert either way.  Cburnett (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was signed into law on December 26th, 2007 as part of the appropriations bill. I have a print article that appeared in Coin World that confirms it but it doesn't seem available online. I linked to About.com's coverage, but if I encounter another online reference, I will substitute it. Psu256 (talk) 21:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It doesn't get more authoritative than this - section 623 of P.L.110-161 Psu256 (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  You can't link a THOMAS search result as it expires.  I haven't found a static URL yet but it's HR 2764.  I quoted it in the reference anyway.  Cburnett (talk) 23:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't know that. Thanks for the info. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/approp/app08.html has the link to P.L.110-161 - that's how I found it. Psu256 (talk) 00:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

text:  I found  and .  Cburnett (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: In God We Trust location

message: Which mint(s) are producing the Presidential $1 Coins? Philadelphia and/or Denver? Other? Thanks! JPG-GR (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: D for sure.  Cburnett (talk) 02:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The US Mint's store is selling P & D rolls.  Cburnett (talk) 02:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. But, *curses* JPG-GR (talk) 02:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the mint's production figures show Denver and Philadelphia. Jwolfe (talk) 05:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the proofs are out of San Fransisco. Psu256 (talk) 14:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mints & Mint Marks

message: Hello folks,
Here are the edits I made to this article:
The article had a statement that saying:
This series of coins are the first ever coins of the United States to replace the written value (ie "one", "two") with an Arabic numeral stating the value of the coin.
This is incorrect. Here's a few examples of pre-Prexibux coins that have the value as a number (not counting the words 'cents' or 'dollars'): 2 cents, Bust half dime, Shield nickel, Bust dime, Bust half dollar, gold dollar, gold quarter eagle, gold three dollars, Bust half eagle
The article as had Bush's term ending in 2009. He has four months to go. I have also added a 2008 design date for the obverse. Hope this helps. - Thanks, Hoshie 22:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit

message: I think this article should be semi-protected due to the high levels of vandalism recently    Juthani1   tcs  16:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lock?

message: I came to this article to find out what the Presidential dollar coins are made of.  Nothing here!  140.147.236.195 (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What are they made of??

message: So is Cleveland getting two separate coins, or just one... or one design, released twice? -155.42.196.63 (talk) 05:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think he is getting two separate coins, just one. It wouldn't make much sense to release two commemorative coins for a president. That would be tantamount to releasing two state quarters for Confederate states because they were once a part of the Union, then they left, and then came back. --68.47.98.185 (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleveland will receive two separate coins, and both will have a different image of Cleveland to distinguish his two presidencies. Gage (talk) 17:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grover Cleveland

message: Is there an explanation for presidents such as Thomas Jefferson's spouses being called Thomas Jeffersons's Liberty? I found that confusing, even though this is probably accurate with the act, there probably needs to be an explanation. Thomas Jefferson did have a wife, but he also had relations with Sally Hemmings so maybe they just didn't want to leave anybody out? --Matthew Bauer (talk) 06:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Jefferson was a widower during his presidency, so there was no First Lady.--Curtis Clark (talk) 02:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Better Explanation for Some President's Spouses Being Called *'s Liberty

message: The U.S. Mint Presidential 1$ coin site says the program terminates at Gerald Ford. I'm guessing that unless Jimmy Carter dies before 2014, Ronald Reagan won't get a coin because his predecessor is still alive. I am going to edit the page to reflect this. 71.114.103.161 (talk) 00:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reagan 

message: For some reason the image of the obverse side of the Cleveland coin does not appear. I have tried to figure out why and given up. Can anyone who knows more about this stuff fix this please because the article looks shit. Thanks. Richard75 (talk) 16:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, it's Harrison's turn now anyway. Richard75 (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image doesn't display properly 

message: Do we really need images of EVERY coin, with images of Presidents not yet honored, and FOUR images of each First Spouse coin (front and back, for both coin and medal)?  It makes the article unnecessarily long.  Perhaps putting only the images on their own page?  Maybe the First Spouses on their own page?  Elsquared (talk) 03:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support removing the Spouse medal images (and the non-coin images of Presidents, as has already been done) - I don't think they're notable enough, they look almost the same as the corresponding coins, and have not been updated for 2 years. I wouldn't mind moving the Spouses to another article, though I don't think it's necessary. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! I've removed the bronzes as I've lost interest in updating them plus the Mint no longer sells each one as a medal; I got the images from the catalog. - Thanks, Hoshie 18:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Small update. I have switched the Presidents to transparent pngs and added this years issues. I have also added "Presidential" to the alt tags for Eisenhower and Kennedy so those with Lynx won't be confused. - Thanks, Hoshie 10:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Mint has announced the Nixon and Ford designs; these have been added to the article. The Reagan design won't be announced until next February: . This is the reason there is no Reagan image on the page. - Thanks, Hoshie 23:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many images! 

message: I spoke with someone from the mint and they clarified to me that the law makes it clear that the presidents must be honored by the term of service. Therefore Reagan is not currently going to be able to be honored in the current law as Carter is still living, and is slated to end after honoring Nixon and Ford in 2016. However, the mint always says "currently", thus when Carter and George H.W.Bush do pass away, ( Not trying to throw them in their grave over a coin), but I am sure that congress will enact the reissue when the eligibility is there, and Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr. will be honored. Carter and Bush Sr. are both 90 years old so I mean we can't expect it to be that far in the future. I am sure republicans will make it a point that Reagan gets honored. I personally understand the law that the person needs to be deceased for two years, but at the same time I feel like the government and mint should just go ahead and honor Carter and Bush Sr. because of their current age, not to mention the coins are not being produced in large numbers as of 2012 but mostly for collectors. That however will not happen because the U.S government is highly opposed to a "kingship" sort of state where living people are honored. In my view however, just the fact that republicans love Reagan, and the fact that he has been deceased longer than Ford gives me a pretty positive stance that the program will be reinstated once Carter passes away and are eligible. However, you should change the program details, as Reagan is not currently scheduled to appear in 2016. If you go to the U.S. mint website and go to the Presidential Dollar page, on the schedule it ends with Ford.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.118.199.28 (talk) 03:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Roentgenium111 (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Regardless of what you think or who you have talked with, the article cannot contain original research and must cite reliable, verifiable sources. This page is not a forum for general discussion of the topic. The article clearly cites a reliable source in which the US Mint states their intention to create the Reagan dollar coin. AHeneen (talk) 18:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reagan is not going to be honored currently

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Presidential $1 Coin Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070319223227/http://biz.yahoo.com:80/ap/070307/godless_dollars.html?.v=3 to http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070307/godless_dollars.html?.v=3
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070410121101/http://www.washingtondollarerrors.com:80/ to http://www.washingtondollarerrors.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article—and linked sources—make perfectly clear that (the very much living) Nancy Reagan will appear on the final, presidential-spouse coin, later this year.
I wonder though, has any other person ever appeared on American currency while still alive?  Either way, ought we not to mention this fact in the article? Pine (talk) 10:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: She died 3 months before the release of her coin, unfortunately. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

text: Other people have actually, though only on commemorative coins: Calvin Coolidge on the 150th anniversary of independence commemorative in 1926, and Eunice Shreiver on the Special Olympics commemorative in 1995. 2601:283:4302:D1F0:9CA0:7F50:98EF:9A5B (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will Nancy Reagan become the first living person on American currency. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Presidential $1 Coin Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071022203414/http://boston.com:80/news/nation/articles/2007/03/22/collectors_report_fake_godless_dollars/ to http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/03/22/collectors_report_fake_godless_dollars/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100713154136/https://www.frbservices.org/operations/currency/new_coin_presidential.html to http://www.frbservices.org/operations/currency/new_coin_presidential.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050802090430/http://www.cbo.gov:80/showdoc.cfm?index=6271&sequence=0 to http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=6271&sequence=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060717212640/http://releases.usnewswire.com:80/GetRelease.asp?id=57048 to http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=57048
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The U.S. Mint press releases presently push off their page (and into oblivion) after a certain amount of time.  Accordingly, any citations to press releases (with the exception of Ronald Reagan, still recent enough to be on the webpage) in the tables are directing to 404 errors.  The last two citations I entered for the First Spouse coin release dates were to industry news articles, but, hopefully, an archive site has preserved the original Mint press releases somewhere.  HavelockWilltravel (talk) 16:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Mint Press Releases sunsetted 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Presidential $1 Coin Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061117035242/http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/testimony/2006/20060719/default.htm to http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/testimony/2006/20060719/default.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100912090216/http://www.canada.com/topics/news/oddities/story.html?id=07509629-5013-43ec-81d6-f453319a46e3&k=12656 to http://www.canada.com/topics/news/oddities/story.html?id=07509629-5013-43ec-81d6-f453319a46e3&k=12656
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/03/22/collectors_report_fake_godless_dollars/
*Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/5uiYMWnwj?url=http://www.frbservices.org/operations/currency/new_coin_presidential.html with https://www.webcitation.org/5uiYMWnwj?url=http://www.frbservices.org/operations/currency/new_coin_presidential.html on http://www.frbservices.org/operations/currency/new_coin_presidential.html
*Added  tag to http://demandware.edgesuite.net/aarb_prd/on/demandware.static/Sites-USM-Site/Sites-usm-site-catalog-us/default/v1431489674485/images/PDFs/2015PricingGridGoldPlatinumProducts.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:America the Beautiful Quarters which may affect this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:29, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Spouse list only goes through 41st First Lady. Please update. THANK YOU!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.115.138 (talk) 06:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update spouse list