Talk:Avianca El Salvador

message: As of today 9/25, TACA has unveiled their new look, and have reverted back to using only TACA, as it was in the past; TACA International (of El Salvador).  The acquisition of the other central american airlines by the Salvadoran firm produced the temporary name Grupo TACA while the unification was ironed out.
New logo, new livery, new uniforms for the staff and pilots.
Here's the link to the unveilment in San Salvador, El Salvador today 9/25 with pictures...
Someone please update this article; anytime I touch a period someone always sends me to hell and block me for weeks, I have no clue why lol.
Thanks.
192.193.221.141 (talk) 18:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEW LOOK for TACA 

message: :Image:Taca.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Taca.gif

message: Woooow, who put a lot of secondary hubs, i think that the secondary hub is just guatemala
this isn't a big airline --200.35.167.27 (talk) 04:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary Hubs 

message: Why la Aurora Airport is not on the secondary hubs section?
this airport is a secondary hub, and soon will be a primary hub too!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.35.167.25 (talk) 22:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For which airline(s)? 68.119.73.36 (talk) 05:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  La Aurora as Secondary Hub 

message: Please check the parent company as it is not Synergy Group. TACA and Avianca formed a new company to hold both airlines. Please checkFrapoz (talk) 05:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Parent Company

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:TACA DC-3s in 1946.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Section 2.1: AviancaTaca and modernization says that Fokker 50's and 100's were being replaced and are currently in use, but from several years ago.  Are these older planes still in use today?  What is the current fleet made of? Nutster (talk) 14:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind.  I found section 5: Fleet.  I will edit the modernization section with the proper tenses.  Should the Fokkers be listed in the historic fleet, however? Nutster (talk) 14:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the Fokkers still in use? 

message: Why was this page moved without consensus? Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 06:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Move? 

message: The lead swaps back and forth between the present and past tenses. Could somebody who's familiar with the subject please correct that? (I suppose it should be in the past tense but it's hard to tell without reading the whole article.) Dricherby (talk) 09:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear lead 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Avianca El Salvador. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060423084858/http://www.nasm.si.edu:80/research/aero/aircraft/fordtri.htm to http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/fordtri.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051118200516/http://www.1940airterminal.org:80/hangar/lodestar/lodestar31g.htm to http://www.1940airterminal.org/hangar/lodestar/lodestar31g.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Avianca El Salvador. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120117074430/http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=aviationdaily&id=news/avd/2011/10/28/05.xml&headline=Lufthansa%20Wants%20Quick%20LATAM%20Alliance%20Decision to http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=aviationdaily&id=news/avd/2011/10/28/05.xml&headline=Lufthansa%20Wants%20Quick%20LATAM%20Alliance%20Decision
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090123175626/http://konzern.lufthansa.com:80/en/html/presse/pressemeldungen/index.html?c=nachrichten/app/show/en/2007/05/686/HOM&s=0 to http://konzern.lufthansa.com/en/html/presse/pressemeldungen/index.html?c=nachrichten/app/show/en/2007/05/686/HOM&s=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131110025739/http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=20001213X25693&key=1 to http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=20001213X25693&key=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello!
Can I please move the page to TACA Airlines? I want to move the page because the article continually references Avianca El Salvador as TACA, so I think it would be easier for the reader to comprehend if we moved the page to TACA Airlines. 
Or we could separate Avianca El Salvador from TACA or vice versa.
Thank you --VolgaDnper1488 (talk) 22:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: This draft may contain additional information, historical and otherwise. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Draft:TACA Airlines]] into [[Avianca El Salvador]] 

message: tengo una tarjeta de millas de años atrás la tube cuando era taca como puedo averiguar si todavía funciona 2600:4040:225A:F300:4E90:B784:82F6:631A (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  tengo una tarjeta de años de viajero pero es de taca cuando la tubecomo se q tengo millas