Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Columbia, Missouri

message: Under the entry for Sam Walton it mentions that he was a member of Beta Theta Pi at Mizzou, the oldest fraternity chapter west of the Mississippi River. That is not true. The Alpha Delta Chapter of Beta Theta Pi at Westminster College (Fulton, MO) was founded in 1868.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.35.96.66 (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sam Walton

message: Has anyone noticed that the link in the Available Images section takes you to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mizzou/gallery page.  Is that right?  Are we sharing the gallery with them because they are also in Columbia, MO, or is this just going there by mistake?  HornColumbia (talk) 05:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When I created the Columbia and Mizzou WikiProject there were very few pictures on Wikipedia of either one.  The pictures that were there were almost exclusively of MU.  So I just created an MU one, hoping a Columbia one could be created someday.  I think now there are probably enough pictures for a Columbia specific gallery.  Hope that answered your question. Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Available Images

message: In addition to the already created category, I've made a list: List of people from Columbia, Missouri  Grey Wanderer 05:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous People

message: Created History Article, and respective link on template, could use more work though, especially the 20th century and recent development sections. Grey Wanderer | Talk 09:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Created a redirect from the page Columbia, Mo also added a reference to the city on the disambiguation page for Como.  Can you think of any other names that need adressing? Grey Wanderer 21:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Names of Columbia

message: The school pages, especially Rock Bridge and Hickman, need to be fleshed out quite a bit.  and I are currently discussing enrollment size issues on David H. Hickman High School's article. Alums/students should update the pages constantly with new information. I don't know how in depth we want to be getting here, but I made up this article for my school. I kind of like the layout, but it can be changed to fit the needs if it so happens. I'd be willing to take on these pages; if anyone would like to assist me, just let me know. Genius00345 23:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been messing around with the Hickman High School page for some time now, you've probably seen me on there, as an alum its about time I got serious.  Nice job with the South Callaway HS page, it blows the city schools out of the water.  Grey Wanderer 03:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Columbia Public Schools

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.   B2T2 19:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 22:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: Article can now be rated by quality and importance. See :Category:Columbia, Missouri articles by quality and :Category:Columbia, Missouri articles by importance for listings. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grey Wanderer (talk • contribs) 10:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia Assessment

message: I got a kick out of this: http://columbiamissourian.com/news/story.php?ID=24766 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grey Wanderer (talk • contribs) 21:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia in the news

message: It seems like it isn't, the MKT trail collaboration didn't get much help from many people and it ended on May 30, but it continued to be the current collaboration for 3 months. The current collaboration that I put up ends today (August 30, 2007) and nobody contributed. I'm wondering if I should leave it or put up another collaboration. Me5000 00:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this group active? 

message: The current collaboration time period is generally set at a month, but I think we should set it at 2 weeks. All the collaborations get their edits from wikiproject participants within a week, so it seems silly to leave a collaboration up for so long. Anyone have any input on this? Me5000 20:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current collaboration time period 

message: I was wondering if the Ragtag Cinema article is still a 2 or if its now a 2.5(if it is, should I move it, or wait for consensus?).  I guess I want to feel special and think its better now.  I know the article isn't that long now, but I don't think it will ever be too much longer than it currently is.  I need to upload a picture for it soon...  --Breakyunit (talk) 10:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at some of the articles in stage 2.5 I would say it's long enough to move. You can go ahead and move it, consensus isn't needed for something as simple as that. Me5000 (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks.  --Breakyunit (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles ranking 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Columbia, Missouri 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: I made a request for a page with popular pages data.  It would look something like Wikipedia:WikiProject_Indiana/Popular_pages.  I think this page will be useful in assessing article importance.  See   and  for more info.  If anyone has any thoughts or concerns about this let's discuss here.  HornColumbia (talk) 03:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular pages 

message: After a recent request, I added WikiProject Columbia, Missouri to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Columbia, Missouri/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 00:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pageview stats 

message: I live in the mid-Missouri area now and have been for a long-time a contributor to articles in my previous home of the Capital District, New York. I was wondering if there were any articles and/or things to do with regard to articles in the Columbia area I could work on while I am out living here. My credentials I believe are pretty good: I'm the co-creator of the Capital District WikiProject, and with help from other editors I was able to do a complete rewrite of Capital District, I created Port of Albany-Rensselaer and got it to GA status, other particularly good articles I created and/or contributed greatly to and that may inspire ideas for Columbia-area articles are List of incorporated places in New York's Capital District, Timeline of town creation in New York's Capital District (still in progress, almost done), Streets of Albany, New York, and Tech Valley. I'm also a member of the Ports WikiProject where soon we will be implementing my idea for adding to the Geobox2 template information relevant to ports so we dont have to start from scratch creating a ports infobox. (I'm a big supporter of using Geobox2 as the infobox on articles as opposed to the older infobox|whatever that used to be used, such as infobox|settlement) I hope to collaborate with many of you on whatever you need me to do while I'm out here, I truly enjoy the area and have found the area's hospitality sincere and generous.Camelbinky (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey! nice to meet you.  There is a list of articles that need work/attention in the to do list on the main page.  I know that Columbia, Missouri has been very close to FA status for sometime and only needs a bit more work to get there.  The University of Missouri article is in pretty poor condition right now.  There is also a list of articles that need to be created and pictures that need to be taken in the mainspace.  Again: glad to have you around, especially somebody with such good wiki experience.  Grey Wanderer (talk) 15:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello... 

message: Does anyone know of any way to watch all the articles in a project short setting this up on each page in the project?  As of today we have only 263 articles in our project.  I would like to see all of them in my watchlist, but I don't want to have to visit ever page.HornColumbia (talk) 15:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watching Articles 

message: I added a link to a bot generated page (see User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details) in the Assessment area.  It should help if you work on general maintenance sort of things or if you are looking for something to work on.  HornColumbia (talk) 04:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Listing 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: I noticed that user:Optigan13 put an inactive tag on this project.  I'm on several projects, but I consider this one my main project.  If you're reading this and you're a part of this project, give a yell here.  Maybe we can get an idea about how many active members we have.  ThanksHornColumbia (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm around as always. Grey Wanderer (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inactive 

message: Okip   01:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced living people articles bot

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Columbia, Missouri articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbia, Missouri articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of :Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject cleanup listing 

message: I have started a conversation here about the possibility of combining some of the United States related WikiProject Banners into . If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please take a moment and let me know. --Kumioko (talk) 19:44, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A consideration for cross project consolidation of talk page templates

message: Short notice, I know, but if you are in town and interested in coming tomorrow evening, you're more than welcome.--Chaser (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Meetup/St. Louis]] 

message: Casliber recently posted a suggestion on the talk page for WikiProject United States about getting the US Wikipedians Collaboration page going again in an effort to build up articles for GA through FA class. See Wikipedia:U.S. Wikipedians' notice board/USCOTM. After several days of work from him the page is up and ready for action. A few candidates have already been added for you to vote on or you can submit one using the directions provided. If you are looking for inspiration here is a link to the most commonly viewed articles currently under the scope of Wikiproject United States. There are tons of good articles in the various US related projects as well so feel free to submit any article relating to US topics (not just those under the scope of WPUS). This noticeboard is intended for ‘’’All’’’ editors working on US subjects, not just those under WPUS.
The next item I intend to start updating is Portal:United States if anyone is interested in helping. Again this is not specific to WPUS and any help would be greatly appreciated to maximize visibility of US topics. The foundation has already been established its just a matter of updating the content with some new images, biographies and articles. Please let leave a comment on the Portals talk page or let me know if you have any questions or ideas. --Kumioko (talk) 19:06, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: US Collaboration reactivated & [[Portal:United States]] starting next

message: Anyone interested in working on Fulton, Missouri to get it up to at least GA status? Please contact me.Camelbinky (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Fulton, Missouri]] 

message: As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).
Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs. 
If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 04:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular pages tool update 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject United States - 50,000 Challenge 

message: Greetings  Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the  that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
* Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration.  Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards,  — Delivered: 17:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages

message: We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month,  will post at /Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of .
 
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
* The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
* The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
* The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to  for his original , and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of , and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular pages report 

message: *
*
Needs moire and better sources.  Several of the buildings on on NRHP. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:43, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus was "Keep". If you contributed thank you. The article has been much expanded, but is still in need of pictures. Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Up for deletion: [[List of tallest buildings in Columbia, Missouri]]

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Slackers CDs and Games has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm  Talk 03:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAR notice 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments