lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dhak (instrument)

message: Why two articles on the instrument and the instrument players without any significance? Merge Dhak (instrument) and Dhaki. Aditya(talk • contribs) 05:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many articles such as Drummer and Drum, Pianist and Piano, Guitarist and Guitar, Flautist and Flute, Organist and Organ, where there are separate articles on the musician and the musical instrument. So what is wrong in having separate articles on Dhaki and Dhak? There is a separate category  Occupations in music. Secondly, if the proposer is bent upon merging, merge Dhak with Dhaki because Dhaki is a longer article with more specific information, and has gone through DYK. In the merger as proposed the DYK tag will get disturbed. - Chandan Guha (talk) 01:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Category talk:Tools

message: I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia.  I don't know how the category pages are taken care of, but I can see that there's no option for editing them here.  Having poked around a bit in recent times, though, I'd say that one of the biggest chores facing those here is getting the categories and indexes in order.  If you look at tools as a good example:  There's no hammer except under metalworking, there's no screwdriver, pliers are only under metal, again.  But there's a pig scalder and a backscratcher - nothing wrong with that, but there's no real organization here, and some other topics are the same thing.  Again, I don't know the mechanism, but anyone browsing these categories (metalworking, mostly) is going to be sorely lacking in guidance.Jjdon (talk) 22:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles are categorized individually within their most specific category to avoid creating categories with too many articles to be meaningful. There are woodworking & metalworking factions here that seem to appropriate general purpose tools (i.e. hammers & pliers) under their favourite subject and this is unfortunate. When odd tools such as backscratchers can be parked with other kinds of related tools we'll move them into more specific cats as someone sees fit.--Hooperbloob (talk) 07:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I've removed this category because I don't see how a tool is a skill. If I'm mistaken please add it back. Wizard191 (talk) 00:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:category:skills|Category:Skills]]
Talk:Skyway Airlines destinations

message: The Midwest Airlines website is still selling the destinations served by Beech 1900's (Escanaba, Manistee, Iron Mountain, Ironwood, Muskegon, Rhinelander) as being operated by SkyWay Beech 1900's even after April 5. Does anyone definitively know what will happen to these destinations on April 6? As you may know SkyWest does not fly Beech 1900's-Drdisque (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Skyway probably hasn't been taken out of the system yet. As of April 5, Skyway will no longer fly for Midwest Connect (or even at all for that matter). The routes should be picked up by SkyWest and their CRJ-200s. Sox23 05:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I pretty much guarantee that they will not be flying CRJ200's to Iron Mountain or Escanaba (routes that currently don't even fill 1900's). I did eventually find a USDOT docket that assigns the rights to Iron Mountain and Escanaba to Mesaba (who will presumably serve them from Detroit). Muskegon and Rhinelander will probably just be cut as the SkyWay service isn't the only service. -Drdisque (talk) 06:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Beech 1900 destinations as of April 5
Talk:List of TAAG Angola Airlines destinations

message: Some of the destinations said that they were terminated, but TAAG still serves them. So I got rid of the grey colors which means terminated. Just mentioning to tell why I made a major change to the article.72.89.35.142 (talk) 02:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted all the changes as they are all unsourced.--Jetstreamer Talk 10:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I updated the article
Talk:Chop Shop (musician)

message: This page is to fill in a lack of general information about the noise musician/sound artist Chop Shop. It includes references and links. Jderosier (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note: this also completes a heretofore dead link on RRRecords for Chop Shop. Jderosier (talk) 23:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  note
Template talk:Airports in Taiwan

message: Cross-strait flights from Makung and Kinmen? And Taitung and Hwalien?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.49.136.151 (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a template about airports in Taiwan, not flights in Taiwan. Chongkian (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross-strait flights
Talk:Design speed

message: Just a note for long-term maintainers: This article needs to be careful not to equate design speed with maximum safe speed. Design speed is sometimes corrupted in common parlance to be a solid recommendation for a road's speed limit. While that may be among the design speed's goals, there are limitations on design speeds that are difficult to overcome, largely that it is main intent is to determine geometric features of road design. As such, design speed is a theoretical measurement of safe operating speeds before a facility is even built. Other factors come into play during speed zoning that may result in a different, lower or higher, speed limit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.25.0.173 (talk) 20:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  True purpose of design speed
Talk:Yankee Sullivan

message: James Ambrose was an Irish boy who was born back on March 10 1811.  He was a simple boy of many charms.  He only was in one official bout.  He was later known as Yankee Sullivan.  His one bout was against Tom Hyer, the first Heavyweight champion of the world.  Sullivan lost the fight and ate a corndog.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.209.25 (talk) 21:48, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavyweight Championship 
Talk:Red herring

message: User:Deor. The Anglo-Norman text is: here on line 317. The Fema edition currently cited with a Middle English translation is actually early 15th century: here on page 79. The other manuscripts listed in the first link date manuscripts to the early 14th century. However, The OED says: "(from 13th cent. in British sources), Anglo-Norman and Middle French hareng sor  (c1290 in the passage glossed in quot. a1333 at sense  1a; French hareng saur)." This is saying the manuscript Gloss. W. de Bibbesworth (BL Add.) (1929) 314 (MED) which dates to 1333 is a gloss of an earlier Anglo-Norman text from ca. 1290 .. thus we can arrive at late 13th century for first known usage, even if the original Anglo-Norman manuscript exists only in the form of a 1333 gloss (I believe this is what is meant).  -- GreenC 22:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The way I interpret the OED's citation is that Bibbesworth used hareng sor in the late 13th century, but the earliest attested use of English "red herring" is in the 14th-century gloss of Bibbesworth's work. I can't really tell whether this article is trying to describe the first evidence of the general idea of a red herring in any language or specifically the first use of "red herring" in English. In any event, I think the sentence should be reworded to make the intended meaning more clear. Deor (talk) 23:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Anglo-Norman texts
Talk:Red Room

message: Like  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.50.65.198 (talk) 18:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

message: I added redroom.com to the Red Room disambiguation page a while back, but it has been since deleted. As someone now affiliated with the project, I can't try to change this back or create an actual redroom.com  article - I understand this might be considered a conflict of interest. But I think it deserves a disambiguation listing as well as an article, as well as being a helpful resource for Wikipedia editors. Redroom.com contains authorized information about writers and their processes. It's also a venue for conversations between renowned authors and their readers, with interviews, reviews and other additional material. The site is notable according to Wikipedia standards as it has been covered in depth by the San Francisco Chronicle and Red Herring.
Huntington (talk) 23:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That whole introductory sentence about Deep Web interactive torture looks completely make-believe, since
#it was the only contrib by User:39.50.46.155 a few edits back,
#it had no sources, and
#Deep Web said nothing about it.
If you ask me, it looks like plain advertising for the indie game Welcome to the Game (http://store.steampowered.com/app/485380/), which finding "The Red Room" is the terminal objective.
And if anyone, contrary to my belif, have read something reliable about it being a real thing, I'd vote that we write a seperate article.
Gaioa (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? Real or not, Red Rooms have been largely rumored to exist for years since before that game existed. Googling "red room" will give you a lot of results about it, and the Steam game is nowhere to be seen in the first pages, even if you've set your Google settings to show 100 results per page. The belief of the existence of Red Rooms a real phenomenon that deserves (at the very least) a mention in this disambiguation page, if not its own article. 186.108.173.112 (talk) 02:36, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted the claim about Deep Web 
Talk:X Y & Zee

message: Thanks for the help. I will be adding to this article over the next few hours.
Busterandbillie (talk) 23:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to X Y & Zee per cited posters and credits. (non-admin closure) WPscatter t/c 15:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Zee and Co. →  – Contemporary movie posters list the correct title:
https://www.historyforsale.com/productimages/large/262326.jpg
https://static.rogerebert.com/uploads/movie/movie_poster/x-y-and-zee-1972/large_dErcGOcxm2jtz9bbvGKV5OT9PSZ.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d8/Zee_and_Co._FilmPoster.jpeg
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Q3hG9yEb8u0/Vx_Nzsd60kI/AAAAAAAAUDI/vH8eXIvmy3Y7-AZ6O75khfdz5ErxzC8UQCLcB/s1600/X-Y-and-Zee-poster-1972.jpg
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069516/mediaviewer/rm277294593/
And most importantly, so do the credits of the film itself (note: uploader has mistitled the video, skip to the 1:05 mark for proof of its genuine title):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEChu65OPEQ
Or at the 1:08 mark in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fa3uH11qc4
The alternate title "Zee and Co." apparently stems from IMDB, which used to list the movie under that title (since corrected), and the error was propogated all over the internet.
IMDB currently says X, Y and Zee:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069516/
This is the title that was listed in programming for a recent cable showing. But what matters most is what the credits of the film itself say. Ieonine (talk) 22:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Splendid! NorbertPfeffers (talk) 03:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 June 2023 

message: I've edited the requested title change in light of the above comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ieonine (talk • contribs) 01:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Splendid! NorbertPfeffers (talk) 03:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Revised title request
Talk:Lazy initialization

message: This article is overrun with examples in 11 different languages; are they really all necessary?  The concept is the important part, not the specific implementation.  One well-explained example (pseudocode) is likely sufficient to get the idea across--67.132.11.102 (talk) 19:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many examples 

message: The Java code source snippet use double checked locking. While double checked locking may provide a (infinitesimal) performance gain, it is a controversial technique which tends to make the code less readable (Java concurrency in practice, p.213-214).
Much more importantly, the use of synchronization may lead to think that this class is designed to be thread safe: this is not the case.
Access to the HashMap.contains(), HashMap.get(), HashMap.keySet() methods AND iterating over HashMap.keySet() MUST be synchronized in a multi-threaded environment.
Thread safety is a important concern when using lazy initialization, additional precision is required in the article.
In addition, this snippet would be actually be more pertinent for a caching system, which is way overkill to explain how lazy initialization work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.192.238.66 (talk) 12:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Java code: thread safety flaw and pertinence 

message: They are the same in the examples as I see. Maybe add a clarification on what aspect each of the subject is dealing with.
* Lazy initialization - Instead of creating each time an item, create it once and use it the next time you want to get a new one. Hide from the user the fact that instead of getting a new item, he gets a used one that fits the need. But if you need an item when the conditions changed, then the system would provide you with a new one - this does not reflect in the examples.
* Multiton - Provide a global list of resources that you cant have more than one for example.
138.134.192.10 (talk) 11:45, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lazy initialization & Multiton pattern
Talk:801 Naval Air Squadron

message: 801 NAS formed up at RNAS Lossiemouth, March 1955. Squadron Commander 
Lt. Cdr. Baker, Senior Pilot Lt. Mancais. 
   The squadron worked up with a two week spell aboard HMS Bulwark, visiting Oslo. In September the squadron had a 10 day spell at RNAF Station at Vaernes, near Trondheim. Back at Lossiemouth until January, 8th 1956, where squadron ground crew entrained for RNB Portsmouth, then embarked HMS Centaur, departing for East of Suez, January 10th 1956. Up to this point the squadron lost 3 pilots killed in air accidents.
  I think it was sometime during February,1956 that our C.O. Lt. Cdr. Baker was killed when his aircraft blew up on catapult launch. He was greatly missed by all the squadron personnel. A little later, Lt. Cdr. 'Boot' Nethersole took command of the squadron. (Earlier Boot Nethwrsole had Benn part of an aerobatic team led by the famous Eric Brown. 
  The squadron went on to visit (in Centaur) Karachi, Colombo, Singapore (where the squadron spent two weeks of comparative luxury at RAF Seleter. Further visits to Singapore, Hong Kong,before returning to UK via Singapore, Malta and Gib. We just nicely got through the Suez Canal, before the crisis. Centaur returned to Devonport, at which time 801 was disbanded.
  Apart from the sad loss of our four pilots it was a really good experience.
.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:2419:7F01:D885:F162:65DF:603A (talk) 21:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RAF Transport Command

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:Air Transport Command (World War II) -- 70.24.250.235 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: {{noredirect|Air Transport Command}}

message: Thank you  for your last edit. As I understand it, only squadrons in the British Isles were part of Transport Command, not the units overseas. It's really important to get as good a source as possible in this regard. Buckshot06 (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of overseas units 

message: I am somewhat surprised to have to emphasize to you  that RAF groups do not form part of each other - they are responsible to a superior command. 
If you have addends of information which are not sufficient to create an article yet, the first and best option is to do more research, and wait until you have sufficient WP:RELIABLE material to expand on bare details of formation/disband dates and unit lists from Rafweb.org and elsewhere, to create a well-rounded article. You will see the first series of edits that produced 46 Group had a considerable amount of readable text  - we are aiming for Featured Articles.
But second if you wish to immediately copy out what is available and do not wish to wait, follow the hierarchy of military organisation - there is a whole section on this page with wings and squadrons, but nothing whatsoever on Transport Command's groups, until I added the data you had helpfully assembled on other groups. Put the data on the higher formation page, where it is placed in proper context, until you have enough material to create an understandable description for "..readers [who] are reading the article to learn." (Also "It is possible that the reader knows nothing about the subject, so the article needs to explain the subject fully." - WP:AUDIENCE). Just providing bare technical details only accessible to a specialist reader is not doing what we're aiming at. So better to assemble enough context then create a separate page. Regards, Buckshot06 (talk) 00:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nos 44, 47, and 48 Groups
Talk:Hartland Snyder

message: Probably this one in SSDI, not enough here to know for sure
*HARTLAND SNYDER  24 Feb 1913  May 1962 (not specified) (none specified) 361-18-2086 Illinois
Gene Nygaard (talk) 23:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it is Start-Class now. YouThinkDotCom (talk) 23:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: not a stub maybe
Talk:Hearts Content Scenic Area

message: The title of this page needs an apostrophe: "Heart's Content."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simeonhennessey (talk • contribs) 18:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's best to use the spelling that the federal government uses, besides I've created redirects for all the variations that use apostrophes just in case some searches for a version using an apostrophe. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​talk•contribs 20:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Agreed. It should be named as it is named by the federal gov't.Dincher (talk) 21:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Apostrophe
Talk:No. 263 Squadron RAF

message: 263 Squadron was NOT disbanded in 1959. It is listed on the RAF order of battle in 1962 and stationed at Watton  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.37.58 (talk) 10:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For public relations' sake, 263 RAF Sqn was given the title of Fellowship of the Bellows-Argentina.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.10.6.4 (talk) 12:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argentine donation squadron
Talk:Herr Otto Flick

message: Shouldn't this just be at Otto Flick? Herr is not part of his name.--75.68.134.170 (talk) 23:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I rather suspect that the joke isn't the similarity of "Flick" to stick, but rather to a certain other one-syllable word beginning with F... 86.132.137.179 (talk) 00:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Flick the Gestapo" 

message: In Soft Beds, Hard Battles Peter Sellers plays Herr Schroeder, a character much like Herr Flick. (Famous quote: When his companion asks wat he did before the war he says: "I was a tax inspector".) The character is so similar, I think, that there must be a connection. Any sources for that? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 11:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prototype of Herr Flick?
Talk:Ache Records

message: I reinstated the notability tag; the two references supplied, while at least prima facie reliable (the magazine of a radio station makes me wonder about editorial standards, but at least there is an editor), they do not amount to significant coverage. The first's only coverage is the single word "Ache" (a link to an almost equally sparse label page), and the second one is not "significant coverage" at only four paragraphs, and multiple, preferably longer, references of this type would be required to establish independent notability. This coverage does argue for retention of content regarding the label however, I would suggest at Andy Dixon per my merge proposal (please do comment on that). --Rogerb67 (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added tags 
Talk:Miskito language (typological overview)

message: While we do sometimes have separate articles for aspects of grammar (e.g. Hungarian noun phrase, Bulgarian verbs), I don’t believe a separate article is appropriate here.
Both this page and the proposed destination were created ages ago by @A R King, who appears to have been inactive for over five years. While the creator is apparently an expert in the topic, both articles need significant CE for tone and layout. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 15:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Miskito grammar]]
Talk:Guilt society

message: Hello, What are some examples of Guilt societies? How can we expand upon this comment (from the "Shame society" page): "Contemporary Western society uses shame as one modality of control, but its primary dependence rests on guilt, and, when that does not work, on the criminal justice system." 137.254.4.6 (talk) 13:37, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples of Guilt societies?

message: This one needs a lot of work. One source for a really big topic. No notice of the contrast to shame culture. I'm willing to work on it, but I'm not an anthropologist, and expertise is needed here. DavidOaks (talk) 03:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Haaalp!!

message: It seems that guilt societies take legal matters very seriously. Maybe I'm off of my league. I personally think the only way to expand this article is to write about the relation between law and guilt society. Komitsuki (talk) 14:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guilt society and laws 

message: How could "the distinction [be] first coined by E. R. Dodds in The Greeks and the Irrational (1951)" if it was "popularized by Ruth Benedict in The Chrysanthemum and the Sword" (1946)? · rodii · 18:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dodds vs. Benedict 

message: This editorial comment has been moved from the end of :
	
:This statement seems inconsistent with the last sentence of the first paragraph: "The distinction was first coined by E. R. Dodds in The Greeks and the Irrational (1951).[4]"  Benedict's work (1946)antedates Dodds'. 
:Source:  Wikipedia, Guilt Culture
— Preceding text originally posted on Guilt society#Origin of term (diff) by 108.31.157.43 (talk⋅contribs) 22:36:53 July 3, 2016 (UTC)
YBG (talk) 23:45, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment moved from article
Talk:Various (band)

message: Please can an editor who knows more than I do about this duo check the links to this page (the normal articles in Special:WhatLinksHere/Various)?  I think most of them should point to Various Artists instead.  I have fixed the obvious ones from non-music articles or music of an earlier era but I expect new links will creep into infoboxes etc.  Thank you. Certes (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate links to this page
Talk:Vitaly Kaloyev

message: According to Russian version of the article, the man has Ossetian name Калоты Къостайы фырт Витали. Viktor Š 21:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: what was the murder weapon?  was he shot?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.1.2.17 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A switchblade knife according to the Caution Tales podcast. 104.178.241.214 (talk) 01:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  weapon?
Talk:Orest Chwolson

message: i agree i will work on it, the content is amost the same so i integrate soonish `ZyMOS (talk) 23:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just merged this with, and redirected to Orest Khvolson. --Reinoutr (talk) 07:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: merger