lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Letters Written in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark/Archive 1

message: Does anyone have a picture of the Trollhätten waterfall that Wollstonecraft visited? Awadewit | talk 23:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably Trollhättan. Maybe this picture? /Nicke L 19:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Vowels do matter, despite what George Bernard Shaw said. Thanks! Awadewit | talk 04:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Waterfall picture

message: The entire title of this book is Letters Written During a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark; that seemed a bit length for an article title. Unfortunately, scholars don't all abbreviate the title the same way. Is the current page name acceptable? Awadewit | talk 18:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: I've taken the liberty of correcting the citation of the 1987 Penguin edition, adding the editor, Richard Holmes, and including William Godwin as author of the Memoirs of the Author of 'The Rights of Woman'. (Godwin shortens the title of Wollstonecraft's book in the title of his Memoirs.) 
Since this edition came from Penguin in the UK (the London address is the first one on the copyright page, it was printed in the UK and the price on the back cover is given in pounds sterling first), I've changed the place of publication from New York to London.--GagHalfrunt 18:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern reprints: the 1987 Penguin edition 

message: *Correct the subsection titles (those having quotes)
:*I was not aware the quotations are prohibited in section headings (I didn't see anything in WP:HEAD, for example, but I could have missed it). I thought it was nice to highlight Wollstonecraft's own language. Awadewit | talk 20:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Basically, it's too eyecatching and doesn't convey the subject clearly.  Vikrant Phadkay 14:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I have removed the quotes, although I do feel that "Hapless woman" conveys the subject much more clearly than just "Gender". Awadewit | talk 15:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

text: *Which paragraphs would you suggesting merging? I thought that I had divided them logically: 1) introduction, 2) biographical background, 3) style and themes, 4) reception and legacy. This structure also mirrors the structure of the article. Awadewit | talk 20:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge 1) and 2) in that case. Not the structure but the content should be mirrored.  Vikrant Phadkay 14:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

text: *See WP:LEAD  Vikrant Phadkay 14:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Oops! its Okay, I just read four there.  Vikrant Phadkay 14:34, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA on Hold

message: Please stop adding empty articlehistory templates to this article; it causes the article to populate the error category.  Editors building articlehistory are encouraged to read the instructions at .  Further, the GA was not passed correctly; it needs an oldid, date and topic.  Please fix so that ArticleHistory can be built correctly.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA and articlehistory
Talk:Expedition 360

message: Clearly the few individuals contending the claim of first circumnavigation are all extraordinary people with courage and determination beyond the norm; it is the definition of circumnavigation which is in dispute, not the endeavour of these adventurers. However, I feel that to cite Lewis as the 'first Briton' to have a claim to this title is to obfuscate what is, by any definition, a great achievement, as it gives no sense that there may not have been thousands of others before him of other nationalities. Lewis is certainly the first to circle the globe via two antipodes and crossing the equator, so until the dust settles a bit I suggest we leave it at that, but also direct readers to those others who have also attempted this challenge.
By the way, some of my pictures of the return to Greenwich are on Flickr.
Coconino 06:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Circumnavigation

message: I think it may help to rewrite both article and merge into one. So, I'dd say, given the small size, and lack of books on the expeditor vs expedition. yes merge. --FR Soliloquy 18:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed my mind! 

message: I'm sorry to see that one of my few contributions to Wikipedia has been removed. I thought it was a good picture of Jason’s arrival in London at the end of his journey. Perhaps there's room for both? --Coconino (talk) 21:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Range of motion

message: Where can I find someplace that is doing stem cell research on people that are suffering from Agent Orange the disks in my spine are gone also the knees Robert Lee Thomas Jr 321 (talk) 12:11, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stem Cell Research 

message: A split of this page has been proposed (not by me).
* Oppose - article is very small and wouldn't have enough content to justify a split at the moment. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split
Talk:Consciousness and Cognition

message: There needs to be more about the specific areas that you find. Include research presented on this topic and cite others as well. This would be an interesting article if you would just go deeper with it and not just explain what cognition and consciousness is. Maddie1013 (talk) 20:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What I would do 

message: Consciousness is located in the ‘now’, which is an interval (0<1) of static time enclosed by the limit of the observer’s I between the ‘beginning’ ‘0’ and the ‘end’ ‘1’. That which is accommodated inside the interval; (0<1) is observed as static picture or a static idea. The consciousness can be also located in the past, within the memory, or in the future, but it is always contained within the current ‘now’. Keeping consciousness for a long time either in the past or in the future the observer risks loosing contact with the material world of his body. KK (178.43.142.128 (talk) 09:45, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is consciousness? 
Talk:Robin Hood Morality Test

message: I first heard of the Robin Hood Test as a nuclear engineer in the early 1980s - it was one of a number of tests I was quizzed about as the industry evaluated their usefulness.  At least one blogger describes Robin Hood as his favorite page (and it's my top link as well).
In Google: "Robin Hood Morality" gets 656 hits. 
I posted in Psychology asking for review and/or expansion of this topic.
Simesa 06:24, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats
Talk:Unhappy triad

message: The 2010 edition of the First Aid for the USMLE Step 1, states that the component of the terrible triad injury are: the anterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, and lateral meniscus.  
Eckroo (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: I found the part of this article confusing. I'm not an orthopedic surgeon or anything, but from what I can gather from Shelbourne et al [1], even though the "classic" O'Donoghue triad does not occur in the majority of cases (rather, the Lateral meniscus is torn), the triad is still CHARACTERIZED by medial meniscus injury. In other words, surgeons do not call an injury of ACL, MCL, and lateral meniscus the "unhappy triad" despite it being more "common" (surgeons feel free to correct this point and revert). The article also has better "flow" by making a change, from "historical content useful for med students" to "more modern content useful for surgeons". I made a revision to the article to clarify this point.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimhsu77479 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion in Structures in triad
Talk:Single-pair high-speed digital subscriber line

message: The contents was previously under the title Symmetric High-speed Digital Subscriber Line. But the correct title according to ITU-T is Single-Pair High-speed Digital Subscriber Line. I created this page and copied the data under the previous title in it, and redirected the old title to the new one.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Reza mirhosseini (talk • contribs)  07:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Anglican Church of Rwanda

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Church of the Province of Rwanda have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate

message: Changes have taken place regarding the relationship between the Church of the Province of Rwanda and the Anglican Mission in the Americas.  See .  I am not sure as to what is the best way to characterize the current situation.  In any event, the reference to the Windsor report is probably unnecessary since it has been largely overtaken by events over the last several years.  Eluchil404 (talk) 08:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMIA
Talk:List of Japanese dishes

message: I'm not really familiar with the criteria for list pages (I know some people dislike them, but I find them really useful). It just seems bizarre to me that this page has all sorts of information, rather than just being a list. It seems like the page either needs to have citations (making it...an article?) or that the descriptions need to be stripped/minimized, because at least some of the information is debatable (such as the origins of "purin").  --Wintersweet (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, this page is a bit of a mess, not helped by the fact that the list could be pretty much infinitely long if modern dishes such as purin and meronpan are added. Perhaps this would be better as a list of "traditional" Japanese dishes, or those known before a certain date (let's say 1926, the end of the Meiji Era) --gilgongo (talk) 09:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think that having more information make it more valuable and therefore less likely for deletion than regular list pages.  I do wonder whether it should be merged with Japanese cuisine, though, which is similar but not limited to dishes.  Rifter0x0000 (talk) 08:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's fine to have a list like this. It allows people to be able to find article more easily, as well as see similar articles on similar foods. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 19:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List?

message: Where did the "steamboat" connection come from? It's not in the actual nabemono article. There is no steaming involved in this dish; it's just boiled. Kortoso (talk) 19:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Oda Mari (talk) 10:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Steamboat"? 
Talk:List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 17

message: I am a lawyer and legal historian, and am updating this list in a table format with case name, Bluebook citation, link to the opinion at www.courtlistener.com; also opinions, lower court, and disposition of the case. I am also adding portraits and information about the justices who were members of the Supreme Court at the time. Ballinacurra Weston (talk) 01:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating this article
Talk:Operation Medak Pocket/Archive 3

message: I would like to start the discussion over, one dispute at a time. first thing is the final parapgraph of the Croatian version of events that says:
"Canadian government, concerned about not harming Canada's reputation for neutrality in the Balkans, suppressed all news of the Canadian participation in the fighting and released only euphemistic statements about Canadian troops "monitoring" the area and "establishing control". It was not until 1996 that details of the battle came to general knowledge in Canada. The Canadian government was also concerned that news of Canadians killing Croatians would be seen in a similar light as the Somalia Affair, where two Canadian soldiers beat to death a Somali teenager, and that would give Canadian army negative and bias image."
Now, u have repeatedly stated that the Croatian version of events defined in the article is the official Croatian government's stand on the issue, but untranslatable. Now, I know enough about international politics that the Croatian government would not accuse the Canadian gov't as racist, especially when they were aidingyour nation to get out of the troubles you had brewed yourself into it? I have never heard of another nation officially accusing another of Racism and covering it up for public relations methods.
--Jadger 22:42, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: start over

message: This article is a mess. Key issues:
* It focuses far too much on the Canadian UN troops' engagement, and doesn't give any adequate detail on the political and military context of the operation.
* It's also very POV. The entire section beginning "Croatian version of events" needs to come out - it plainly doesn't comply with our NPOV policy, and the "disclaimer" at the top of it is totally unencyclopedic. That's simply not acceptable.
* On a related issue, I see that Ceha has created a POV fork of the "Canadian version of events". The NPOV policy doesn't allow this (see the Wikipedia:Content forking guidelines also). I intend to speedily delete this fork.
* The assertions made in the article are unreferenced. This violates our "cite sources" policy.
I'll put together a revised version of the article, based on cited and verifiable sources, with a neutral point of view and addressing the omissions that I've highlighted above. -- ChrisO 18:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fresh start needed here

message: They seem to have been deleted.  Is that normal or did they get removed by someone?  Just curious.  --P-Chan 10:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They didn't get moved when I renamed the article (capitalising the P in "pocket"). I've fixed this now. -- ChrisO 07:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahhh.  Much better.  --P-Chan 01:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anyone know what happened to the old talk archives?
Talk:Kenwood High School (Maryland)

message: Removed the following alumni as there is no proof of notability or attendance:
* Mike Preston, sports columnist with the Baltimore Sun
* Kyle Jaski, current Punter/Kicker at Lincoln University (PA)
* Pete Vasilarakis, current lineman for the Coast Guard Academy in Connecticut
* Donald Stone & Michael "STICK" McKinney, Ocean City MD 2012 Hot Dog Eating Contest Tag Team Champions (175 Combined Hot Dogs in 10 minutes)
Meters (talk) 02:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  alumni 
Talk:Everest base camps

message: "South Base Camp is at 10 ft (3.1 m)"
I'm sure this is incorrect, but not knowing the correct number I'm not qualified to change it. McGehee (talk) 05:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How High?

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
=== After closure ===
Alas, I'm a bit too late to the discussion. While I understand the point the nominator was making (naming consistency), whenever I hear anyone talking about it, they usually refer to it as Everest Base Camp and do not include the Mount as when said in context, Mount is certainly implied and is understood as referring to the mountain. I myself don't include the Mount when I am referrng to it. I think common English usage indeed trumps in this scenario at this point in time. RedWolf (talk) 02:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

text: On reflection, I think that all the above is correct reasoning and my naming consistency mania was, in this instance, misplaced. Ericoides (talk) 08:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Alas, I'm a bit too late to the discussion. While I understand the point the nominator was making (naming consistency), whenever I hear anyone talking about it, they usually refer to it as Everest Base Camp and do not include the Mount as when said in context, Mount is certainly implied and is understood as referring to the mountain. I myself don't include the Mount when I am referrng to it. I think common English usage indeed trumps in this scenario at this point in time. RedWolf (talk) 02:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection, I think that all the above is correct reasoning and my naming consistency mania was, in this instance, misplaced. Ericoides (talk) 08:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  After closure 

message: Shouldn't this article be split into North and South versions? --Voidvector (talk) 04:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: There is only one instance of Rombuk in this article, while Rongbuk is mentioned at least 5x. For consistency shouldn’t it be changed? echo7tango (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Rombuk to Rongbuk for consistency.
Talk:Santa Maria della Salute

message: I am not an architect, but I think a Basilica is quite different from the Salute, the plan of which is mainly central. I suggest to shift the article under the already existing Santa Maria della Salute title, and to refer to it in the text as a "church". --Stefano Remo 08:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, actually I had not read thoroughly the article Basilica, which gives a complete explanation. --Stefano Remo 21:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basilica? 

message: > Basilica di Santa Maria della Salute (Basilica of St Mary of Health/Salvation)
Is that correct? Shouldn't "salute" refer to a formal welcome, that is either the when the Lord's angel greeted Virgin Mary and telling her about her pregnancy or the meeting between St. Anna, mother of John the Baptist and the Virgin Mary? 82.131.210.162 (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name? 

message: The interesting story is basilica was partly built of the stone blocks of Diocletian Palace in Split, Croatia. Walter9 (talk) 16:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Built of stone blocks of northern towers of Diocletian Palace
Talk:Attila (miniseries)

message: A couple of things that should be added is that in the movie they show Attila taking the city of Orleans when the wiki on Attila shows he never took the city.  Another more important flaw in my mind is the tactic it shows the Marian Legions using with their pila.  The movie showed the Roman soldiers using the pilum as a hand-to-hand weapon when it was meant to be thrown before a charge with short swords meant as the melee weapon.  --Petahhhh 08:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Inaccuracies

message: Constantinople appears in this television series as part of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire. Some of the scenes are set in the Eastern Roman Empire, and Tim Curry fills the role of Eastern Roman emperor. Accordingly, I have categorized this article under "Byzantine Empire in art and culture" or other media.
--152.21.36.184 (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Eastern Roman Empire
Talk:Dark Sun (novella)

message: Does this novel fit between Mad Dogs and The Sleepwalker or between The Sleepwalker and The General? Ollieinc (talk) 06:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I looked on the CHERUB website and the page for Dark Sun is http://www.cherubcampus.com/html/book95.htm - so it is book 9.5, hence going between Sleepwalker and General. This also fits publication order (..., Sleepwalker, Dark Sun, General, ...). Contrary to this, it says on that page, "Dark Sun is a completely seperate story that fits between Mad Dogs and The Sleepwalker", but I think that is just a mistake by whoever wrote that webpage. Ollieinc (talk) 06:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology
Talk:Allison Hedge Coke

message: I will again remove the content restored by Phenocia. There are several problems with it. Firstly, when Phenocia restored it, only the appearance was restored, not the wiki code. Thus, references were broken, and only non-functional tags (like [32][33]) remain. That could, of course, be fixed. Secondly, none of those references were reliable secondary sources. Primary sources can be used on Wikipedia, but only with extreme care, and not as the sole basis of large amounts of content. Basing arguably promotional sections only on primary sources is particularly inappropriate. Thirdly, large amounts of content did not cite any sources whatsoever. Fourthly, the "Career" section had many inline external links. That's not appropriate by our guideline on external links, and those did not point to reliable third-party sources anyway, often not even to websites mentioning Hedge Coke at all.
I will, however, add something based on the American Literature review of Hedge Coke's work. That is the only source formerly in the "critical reception" section that's helpful; all the others were broken links, non-independent, or otherwise unhelpful. Huon (talk) 21:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Phenocia and User:LissaStoner appear to be sockpuppets and likely are Allison Hedge Coke herself. This article has served as a promotional résumé instead of an encyclopedic entry. Thank you for your clean up efforts, User:Huon. Sincerely, Yuchitown (talk) 23:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken code, unreferenced content, non-independent sources 

message: If you read the descriptions of the various tribal categories and the lengthy discussions throughout Wikipedia about Native American identity, living people absolutely have to be tribal members. Generally, there has to be some recognition by the tribes that the individual claims that the tribe in return acknowledges the individual as a member. Neither the Wyandotte Nation nor any Canadian First Nation has never acknowledged Coke as a member. Yuchitown (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native identity
Talk:Shenzhen railway station

message: Does the fast service to Guangzhou qualify as CRH, or is it a regular train? I'm not sure whether it should be displayed as such. Jc86035 (talk) Use to reply to me 05:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: do u refer to the Guangzhou~Shenzhen Intercity Express (广深和谐号)? Yes, these express trains start their train number with "C" and these trains are operated by CRH1. MNXANL (talk) 06:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've readded the icon to the infobox, although maybe it should be clarified that the station's not on a CRH (high-speed – 250+km/h) line. Jc86035 (talk) Use to reply to me 13:03, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRH
Talk:Dystheism

message: Removed redirect as the the the hatred of gods versus the concept that all god might not be good seem too distinct to remain merged.Paulfromatlanta (talk) 21:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I read it as meaning that a person can discuss the nature of the Abrahamic god without necessarily believing that that god actually exists. But I agree that the wording is awkward. 173.77.78.173 (talk) 18:04, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If anything, God as the Devil would only deserve to be merged with misotheism. The Devil in many different religions and cultures (yes, even outside the Abrahamic ones) is considered to be completely evil, dystheism is where they could not be completely evil. Bozo33 (talk) 08:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't say he is the Devil. Jackninja5 (talk) 12:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: "God as the Devil" is rather a mess, and it's not clear what exactly should be done with that page. Historically, accusations of devil-worship have been frequently made against a huge variety of targets, but it's not clear how to write that information out into a coherent article (at least, to me). CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect of [[God as the Devil]] to [[Dystheism]]