lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kurt Goldstein

message: http://amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/104-6455427-4141544?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Kurt+Goldstein&Go.x=7&Go.y=13&Go=Go
The Teuber obituary, to which I added a reference, includes a detailed description of Goldstein's life and contributions by someone who knew him well in his later years.  Gwestheimer 18:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are no copyright problems with an article on http://www.antiessays.com/free-essays/Psychology-542629.html
That "essay" dates from November 11, 2013, so it is obvious that it is just the other way round. That "essay" is a copy of the original wikipedia article on Goldstein (article history). This wikipedia article came first.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CP#Backwards
Friedhelm, Germany --79.228.0.84 (talk) 11:50, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No copyright problems 

message: Please stop making changes/removals before discussing and explaining them here. Goldstein was German At the time of his birth Gemany existed in form of the German Empire; Prussia was part of it. Friedhelm --79.228.24.190 (talk) 11:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just noticed that you tried a similar change before, in February 2014.  Please stop it. Friedhelm --79.228.24.190 (talk) 12:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You go on removing and distorting data. You do not explain and discuss. I shall have to report this as vandalism, if you keep on doing this. Friedhelm --79.228.24.190 (talk) 15:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  @ Aostachuk, nationality etc.
Talk:Paul Peek (politician)

message: I became interested in Paul Peek when my mother-in-law told me that she had kept house for his family.  I had thought that the two Frank Jordans had been Secretary of State for 60-odd years without interuption (that's what the younger one had told my 8th-grade class when we toured the State Capital in 1962), but it turned out that they had 'just' won every election for 60 years.  Peek had been appointed to fill out the first Jordan's term when he died in office.
I am confident that Peek meets the notability standard, even though few Constitutional Officers have pages other than governors. Assembly Speakers are sometimes the most powerful politician in California--I think that they would almost always meet the test.
This is my first page.  Please let me know if there was a better way to distinguish this page from Paul Peek, the rockabilly musician. If you can offer advice or handle it yourself, feel free.
I'm not at all sure that I linked in all of the appropriate places--I think that I need to read the new member info again. I also plan to learn more about the ref tags, since it looks like I ought to be able to combine multiple references.  Again, advice is welcome.
I have a photo from a state website that seems to meet the fair use standards, so I'll get that up next. And one of the politician infoboxes.
There are references online to some kind of political issue about a dictaphone when Peek was Speaker--I may have to go to the library to figure that out before I add it. [Note: I posted this at 23:31, October 8, 2006, when I didn't know how to behave here. --Hjal (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Newbie at work--please advise

message: Most of the links listed as references are now bad.
Hal3ko (talk) 20:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link rot 
Talk:Tymon Dogg

message: I removed some info in this revert which may have some use if sourced and NPOVed.  Just adding it here so it doesn't get lost in the old revisions. gren グレン 07:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed some info

message: The page has a neutrality warning on it, but there's nothing here to substantiate it (or, as far as I can see, anything on the page to warrant it). Assuming nobody raises objections here, I'll remove it shortly. Johnb78 (talk) 10:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody did, so I have. Johnb78 (talk) 14:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality?
Talk:Bryan Lunney

message: I recently removed the first part of this sentence to make it timeless.
As of 2021, he and his father are the only multi-generational flight directors to have served NASA.
I was reverted with the reason that this could change and make it dated. I reverted back, I guess I could have waited but was also thinking BRD, and started this discussion.--Malerooster (talk) 18:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:ASOF is basic stuff.  See related MOS:CURRENT.  Three years from now, if there is another multi-generational family, this statement is invalid.  Because Wikipedia is dynamic, not hard print, we should take care not to create this problem, but I am not going to take time on such a small matter. SandyGeorgia (Talk)  18:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the links. I was looking for them. I was also trying to find a link about how articles should be written in a manner that is "timeless". I remember reading about that style but couldn't find it. I don't really think that this is material which will be "dated quickly" per ASOF, especially considering they are the only ones in the history of the organization so far, but I guess that is up to editorial consensus.--Malerooster (talk) 18:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am not aware of any essay on timeless Wikipedia writing (would be good to have), but I'll give you a made-up example of how to avoid MOS:CURRENT in a timeless way. In geography articles, one often finds things like "current mayor" or "current legislator", which screams for an "as of" date as the elected officials will change.  One can instead say something like ... Mayor John Smith was elected in year A; he represented the Y party and received Z% of the vote.  That works in the year so becomes timeless, while avoiding "as of" and avoiding "current".  So, if you can come up with a more elegant way to express that this is *not* timeless data, but something subject to change over time, that would be grand.  But if I am reading the sources correctly, it is a true fact still in 2021 although whether Bryan is still at NASA is unclear.  SandyGeorgia (Talk)  19:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

text:  Edit conflict ... not convinced by "first" since that implies there is a second; as of 2021, there is not.  Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk)  19:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe ... at the time of his father's death in 2021, they were the only multi-generational ... ???  SandyGeorgia (Talk)  19:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I know what you said about "first" but maybe ...at the time of his father's death in 2021, they were the first and only only multi-generational ... ? --Malerooster (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Something like that will work ... I will leave it to you as quite busy elsewhere, SandyGeorgia (Talk)  19:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Done. I was thinking that maybe this sentence should go after the next paragraph's first sentence that says when he became a flight director. I'll leave it for now. --Malerooster (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeless article.
Talk:Religious views on business ethics

message: This article was originally split from business ethics. See the talk page for business ethics for about 3 years of discussion on splitting. The religion sections originally formed the core of the business ethics article, which has since been improved. Considerable work over a number of years went into refining the current religion section.
In the process of splitting, the text has not been changed. I'll leave that for someone who knows the field better than I.
Caravaca 07:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of this article
Talk:Center for Inquiry – On Campus

message: See Talk:Center for Inquiry#MERGE for discussion. -THB 07:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The Campus Freethinkers link is returning a 404 error message.  The google cache is here. -George100 10:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad link
Talk:Alesia (city)

message: Interestingly, this article makes no attempt to even remotely place the location of Alesia in modern France. "Somewhere near modern Paris" or some such thing would be rather useful. A map doubly so. Even if it's location isn't precisely known, I would have to assume there's a good enough idea of its approximate location to be able to provide readers with an idea of roughly where it was at. RobertM525 08:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i guess the current statements ("There have been archeological excavations since the time of Napoléon III in Alise-Sainte-Reine in Côte d'Or near Dijon, which have claimed that the historical Alesia is located there. New discoveries are constantly being made about this Gallo-Roman settlement on the plateau of Mont-Auxois") answer your query? -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 23:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is it? 

message: Should i undo revision 306508535 by 173.79.191.200 (talk)? Following the link, i can read "Oppidum (plural oppida) is a Latin word meaning the main settlement in any administrative area of ancient Rome." Therefore, the current version is like having "Rome is a settlement (City) in Italy." - what's the point of the capital 'C'? -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 23:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, it sounds like the oppidum article could so with some work as the oppidum of Manching was never in an "administrative area of ancient Rome". Anyway, "oppidum" is not a proper noun and should not be capitalised so I have reverted the edit. Nev1 (talk) 23:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[oppidum]] 

message: What weakness? The text doesn't refer to it even once. Was it historically significant or something?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.147.138 (talk) 17:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ‘shows ''the'' weakness’
Talk:Kaluchak massacre

message: :Plz expand this article. I have cited some articles on the 'References' section to get people started.Hkelkar 08:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand 
Talk:Barry Goldwater High School

message: This page while good was very crufty, unsourced and sounded more like a english paper than an encyclopedia article. I have cleaned it up and sourced most of the article but that required me to remove most of it as it could never be sourced. Please do not revert it back to the it's old state as it will be reverted back and before adding anymore info you must have a reliable source for it. BJTalk 10:03, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, you basically ruined the whole article on this. Shadowrun 10:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To Barry Goldwater students and other editors

message: I removed a TON of un-encyclopedia blather. Please see guidelines about original research and verifiability. This article should only contain encyclopedic facts about the school. Oniononion (talk) 03:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an encyclopedia, not a school handbook 

message: Please make sure that if you add information to this page, it is proper encyclopedic content according to the guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines. For example, extensive year-by-year descriptions of extracurricular activities are normally inappropriate for an article such as this. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Content guidelines
Talk:Fugger family

message: Nicknamed 'the rich fugger' - that can't be serious. --Pengutron (talk) 08:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree -- the so-called "Fugger news-letters" of the late 16th / early 17th should also be mentioned... AnonMoos (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Also important is what happened to the family fortune. Did the bankruptcy of Philip II ruin the family? Myron (talk) 13:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial comments

message: With all seriousness I can muster: the German Wikipedia mentions the original writing of the name Fugger, wich was Fucker [ˈfʊkɐ] when they arrived in Augsburg. Worth mentioning? Struthio Ostrich (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:German States Fugger 1621 10 Ducats.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 12, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-03-12. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: Needs to be a good byword on the Fugger coat of arms. Why the armless black woman wearing a pope hat and why the Fleur de Lys? 2A00:23C7:2B13:9001:87:ECF4:D7C9:3C76 (talk) 12:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be a good byword on the Fugger coat of arms. Why the armless black woman wearing a pope hat and why the Fleur de Lys?  

message: Hi, the article isn't exactly bristling with references. I'd be interested in refs for the title of this post. T 2A02:FE1:E16B:CC00:DA63:B162:420A:CA58 (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for mining in Scandinavia?
Talk:St. Mary's Central High School

message: I don't wish to edit this post any further than adding this photo of the school crest
http://www.smchs.org/templates/img/logo-shield.png
to this page. I am a graduate of this high school and would like to represent this institution appropriately on Wikipedia.
Thank you.
Pat20 (talk) 23:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In order to add the logo to the article it would have to be uploaded to Wikipedia and would either have to not have a free copyright or be in compliance with WP:NFC.  You can visit Wikipedia:Uploading images for more information. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 03:12, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Pat20, 30 August 2011 
Talk:Priddy (surname)

message: What is missing now is contrary information on the Priddeaux family which claims the surname as well, but that it is not Welsh, but French/Norman.  This information is not verified as of yet and may turn out false.  I have heard both that the names are related and that the spellings are merely coincidence depending on the person.  --Trakon 08:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to find references on Priddeaux

message: I seem to remember seeing something like, "priddy the deck," in a Patrick O'Brian novel.  It might be worthwhile to discover the meaning and etymology behind the verb.  Maybe there is a significant connection with the surname and military service, for example (as would appear the case with Priddy's Hard).  --Trakon 09:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship to the verb, to priddy

message: I created the Priddy disambiguation page because I was looking for someone in particular with the last name Priddy.  I had already known about the naval base, but I hadn't known about the town (which is where the main article directs to).  In response I also created the surname page (because I am an etymology trivia nerd).  The organization is appropriate, but it is true, there isn't much on the surname.  If the surname page is to be deleted, what little information there is should at least be archived to the talk page of the disambiguation; I respect the philosophy of those who weed out the stub articles, but I do not believe in losing information.  
On the other hand, after looking up some very common names, articles such as Anderson and Anderson (surname) exist in the same form that I originally created the Priddy pages under.  In this case, it is appropirate to separate disambiguation pages from surname pages from lists of people who have the surname, etc.  So it seems the question is rather about whether Anderson gets special treatment due to its wide usage, or whether Priddy is substandard because not enough information has been compliled on wikipedia.  It cannot easily be both, or else the question is what surname is canonized for referencing information about itself.  
Priddy is not as widespread as Anderson, but I have already increased the information on the disambiguation page, so to say the name is non-notable is inaccurate.  The only thing missing is more information on the background of the name.  I have decided I will find more information to add to the surname page to follow suit.  The Anderson pages have now become my primary examples.  
Thoughts anyone?
--Trakon 22:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prodded for deletion
Talk:Eastern Chatino

message: References:
The article states: "Ethnologue 16 differentiates six Chatino languages."
However, 
# the Ethnologue is not listed in the references section of the article.
# Should this attribution be given to the Ethnologue given that the Ethnologue is bound to the ISO 639-3 standard. Shouldn't the standard be cited for the separation as languages, and then the Ethnologue be cited for the family orientation. --Hugh Paterson III (talk) 02:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Type (zoology)

message: I am not going to get involved here, but this does not look all that good to me.
I would like to note that the replaced "A type specimen is a phrase that was used in previous editions of the Code for ..." is an exact quote from the current Code, while the new material is at odds with the ICZN. Brya 09:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

message: The phrase "used in previous editions of the Code" does not (and should not be interpreted to) actually imply that the term "type specimen" is not still in use; merely that the Code does not formally recognize the term, because of its imprecision. That is not going to be immediately obvious to laymen, I suspect, and it is best to avoid that phrasing. Not everything in an encyclopedic treatment such as WP has to be a verbatim quotation of original material, nor only acknowledge technical definitions. It is simpler to explain to the readers what terms are in use and what they mean. I have a copy of the present Code here in front of me, and while I see some parts of the WP article are simplified relative to the Code itself, there is nothing genuinely contradictory. At most, a few exceptions to general rules have been omitted, but it hardly seems worth including the phrase "...unless someone petitions the ICZN..." in multiple places simply to indicate that the rules can be broken. I'll look this over carefully again, but I think you are overly concerned about how explicitly the technical details are presented, when this is intended as a general summary. 138.23.134.119 20:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It may not look "all that good" but it is not inaccurate
Talk:Must Find Toes

message: Corrected the phrase: "Then, for the first time in the series, Nancy is seen smoking marijuana, though it was implied that she did at the end of the pilot episode." 
In the pilot episode, there is no implication that Nancy smokes. Possibly a more accurate way to describe it would be in the fact that she is a dealer and therefore she possibly smokes. It is not unreasonable to assume Nancy does smoke. However, the show never leads on to this possibility. There was a mention of Nancy's 'secret stash' in season one when Andy pulled out the tampon box that was attacked rodents.
68.205.226.161 09:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction
Talk:Chatinos

message: There's a French documentary worthy a mention, if anyone knows who's the director. It's about a teacher "José P. Ramirez" running a school in the Chatino community. Worth a watch for anyone interested in the Chatino subject.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.214.241.85 (talk) 04:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:AC Petacciato

message: The homepage of this side was marked as spam... how can I work it out? CapPixel 09:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Marina Barrage

message: i read something today about 1.1 billion that's going to be earmarked for a freshwater circulation project that's will begin when the barrage is complete.  The idea is to keep the water flowing, i'm not sure of the details.  A more detailed article is needed.  DaronDierkes (talk) 05:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  recirculation 

message: The location has just been edited to the western end of the structure, rather than the centre point. Does anyone else have an opinion on this? Is there a standard convention on Wikipedia? Gareth Jones (talk) 12:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 
Talk:Go! Go! Itsutsugo Land

message: There is an English dub of this series called Let's Go Quintuplets, which I believe was dubbed by the Ocean Group, as it used the voice talents of Scott McNeil and Richard Newman. It has aired in New Zealand and probably Canada. 203.184.3.168 (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Dub
Talk:Kovács (surname)

message: This should be renamed Kovács, I guess.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Slovan (talk • contribs) 09:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: *Support merge into Kovacs and move this article to Kovács (or merge the edit histories, if some admin wants to take that on).  Kovacs is the older article, but a majority of the name-holders listed use the accented form. -- JHunterJ 12:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: The article states that the name Kovacs "is cognate to the English name Smith."  This is a misuse of the word "cognate".  There is a loose definition and a strict definition of "cognate", and the use here is incorrect under both.
The loose, informal definition is that two words are cognate if they are similar in sound and meaning.  "Kovacz" is not similar in sound to "Smith".
The strict definition used by a historical linguist is that two words in different languages are cognate if they are inherited directly from the same form in a language which is ancestral to both languages (e.g. English "father" and Latin "pater" are cognate because these words are inherited from the same Indo-European word).  Note that inheritance is not the same a borrowing.  Given that English and Hungarian are not demonstrably related, word pairs in English and Hungarian cannot be cognate, by defintion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.25.117 (talk) 14:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Linguistic Mistake

message: Why is this page in the category :Category:People_of_Kohanim_descent?  Is the name of Jewish origin?  Rojomoke (talk) 13:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kohanim?
Talk:Theatre in the round

message: I marked the following sentence as needing to be cited: "Originally this idea was conceived for the progressive-rock group Yes by their tour manager Jim Halley in the mid 1970's.  This revolutionized rock concerts, ticket sales and venue seating arangements."
Although I wasn't around at the time, I find it hard to believe that theatre in the round as a modern practice didn't exist until the 1970's, and that it was invented by a rock group, and not an experimental theatre group. Unless someone can cite this or explain it better, I will delete this sentence.--Cassmus 05:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation
Template talk:Nothanks-add

message: This template is based on , but has been reworded to better fit situations where copyrighted text is added to an existing article. It does not welcome the user, so it is suitable for those that have already been welcomed. 
It asks for source(s) to be cited if the article is rewritten in their own words, this has the side-effect of making it easier to check that they have actually rewritten the information. Thryduulf 10:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin and applicability