lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Glutathione

message: Reverted https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glutathione&type=revision&diff=1054555623&oldid=1050207757. It's a good question (I don't know the topic well enough to know what the answer is) but the edit shouldn't have been made on the page itself; it should have been raised on the talk page.
Anyway, I doubt the author of that change I just reverted is paying attention to the talk page, but if so, glutamate does have two carboxyls but it may be that only one of the carboxyls is actually capable of attaching to cysteine? No idea but either way if the sentence needs to be modified in that way then I favor the "between a carboxyl group" wording.
TL;DR: I reverted the change because it's basically well-intentioned vandalism so to speak, but they might have an actual point on the question that was raised. But again I don't know much chemistry etc so I'm not equipped to say whether the sentence as it stands now ("between THE carboxyl group") is accurate or if the wording needs to be amended. So I'm re-raising that community member's question here, in a more appropriate venue, if anyone has an answer one way or the other. RyanSKemper (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks .  The sentence is fine as is.  Glutamate does indeed have two carboxyls but only one is on the side chain. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 08:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glutamate having two carboxyls 

message: The suggestion given in references ( www.royalclinicdubai.com on dermatological use for skin whitening using an  injectable administration route  are plain dangerous. And, beside the obvious self-serving marketing, the verbiage, rationale and the examples are inaccurate, taken out of the context or or plainly manipulated. Ovi Ciobanu (talk) 05:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to skin whitening and injectable administration are plain dangerous
Talk:Margam Castle

message: I will need help here, I am struggling to find more information and my information is rather limited. When was the castle built and which member of the Talbot Family payed to have it built?
Draig goch20 19:46, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
:This text might make a brief paragraph at Port Talbot, New South Wales— if the town itself had an entry. This would become a redirect. No information lost. --Wetman 21:26, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Almdudler

message: I reverted 2 edits in which a troll added obviously made-up content to this article without any references.  The German Wikipedia has a much better article on Almdudler (or read in broken English via Google Translate), although I am not fluent in German so translating it into English correctly would best be done by someone fluent in both languages. I have been to Austria and drunken Almdudler myself and it is a sweet carbonated soda with a light tan color and a nice taste, and is caffeine free. --69.205.231.117 (talk) 08:25, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:19, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]] 

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]]
Talk:Tab (drink)

message: The article spells the name both "Tab" and "TaB." All of these should be changed to one or the other (including the title). So which is it officially? --Fez2005 23:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's irrelevant how a logo is styled, otherwise we'd have SONY, vodafone, ebaY, etc. Even if Coca-Cola insisted on this spelling in normal text, which they don't, WP:CAPS is pretty clear about this -- it would be "Tab". ProhibitOnions (T) 07:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent: Tab vs. TaB 

message: *
This was previously cited in the article, but I replaced it with more detailed material from the United States National Cancer institute's website. —Coconutporkpie (talk) 06:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Newspaper source on saccharin, 1980

message: I was told a different story. The naming project was given to one of the Coca Cola regional MD's (Thomas Antony Boorman) to run. When the project was ready for presenting to the board. The file (like all at CC) it had his initials in the top right hand corner. The CEO hated all the computer generated names, slammed the file shut, saw Tom's initials and said "TAB it is" O'Carroll Woo (talk) 15:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Got a source for that? Because it sounds implausible. oknazevad (talk) 17:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The very man himself...35yrs ago. 100% true 2A00:23C6:1680:C101:184E:FEDE:B53F:EBC1 (talk) 17:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TAB
Talk:Parliamentary constituencies in London

message: Could we not split this up into say four areas of London to make it slightly more viewable and easy to use? --New Progressive 20:57, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Given it is a stable page and will only change after Boundary Commission changes every 8-12 years then I'm not sure splitting it is really that needed. --Vamp:Willow 15:35, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think splitting it up is worthwhile either, there are a lot of constituencies but the boundary commission adjusts them all within Greater London so any split we create would be artificial. -- Joolz 14:07, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I understand it, the Boundary Commission re-allocate constituencies in the context of local authorities (for example, Greenwich and Bexley are grouped together and seats drawn up by allocating wards. It would, therefore, be possible to divide London on this basis, but it wouldn't be by any other typical split (for example, Southwark and Lambeth are grouped together, so neither South East or South West London would be ideal) edd 18:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split this up

message: As there has been an election since - what was changed by the review? Jackiespeel (talk) 21:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes proposed in 2016 

message: Is there a better way to list the constituencies proposed for 2023 than what we have at the moment? The 55 subheadings make the contents quite unwieldy, and I don't think each one contains enough text to warrant a heading. I think the information would be better presented in table format:
Constituencies proposed for London
Name	Districts covered
BC  	Bromley
BC  	Bromley
BC  	
CC  	Bromley
Etc.	Etc.
I think another solution would be to simply list the constituencies without mentioning the boroughs, because I can't think of a good reason to include borough information for the 2023 proposals but not for the current constituencies or any previous ones.  dummelaksen  (talk • contribs) 22:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 boundary review 
Talk:Satanic School

message: A subdivision at Robert Southey, if it is worth mentioning there. --Wetman 21:01, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Seems NNPOV saying Satan is wrong in Milton's Paradise Lost.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.63.237.146 (talk) 02:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NNPOV?
Talk:Luna Amară

message: Do the CAPS make them notable? --Wetman 21:10, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Sadegh Ghotbzadeh

message: "In April 1982 and after Iran-Contra scandal, he was arrested along with a group of army officers and clerics (including son-in-law of religious leader Ayatollah Kazem Shariatmadari), all accused of plotting the assassination of Khomeini and the overthrow of the Islamic Republic." 
The Iran-Contra Affair didn't begin till 1983: See THE IRAN-CONTRA AFFAIR, 1983-1988 66.234.220.195 (talk) 03:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronism 
Talk:Boom Town (Doctor Who)

message: Wouldn't it be more relevant to have this note at The Empty Child, given that that's the first instance of the gag in the new series? I know I could move it myself, but I thought I'd better ask as there might be a good reason for it to be here that I've missed. Angmering 01:01, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, go ahead and move it. I don't recall it in the Empty Child, however.  Where was it? Sean 01:47, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In the corridor at the hospital just after Rose and Jack have met up with the Doctor, and he's complaining at her for telling Jack he was called Doctor Spock. Angmering 01:59, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Doctor who?" gag
Talk:Hydra (mythology)

message: From WP:RfD:
* Hydra (mythology) → Lernaean Hydra -- Delete because no one will ever accidentally stumble upon "Hydra (mythology)".  There are no links to it, and Hydra is already a disambig page with a link to Lernaean Hydra. Tufflaw 00:35, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
** Yeah, but I can easily see someone typing in Hydra when they are writing another article. (Trust me, plenty of people don't search, or don't bother to check that their links link to what they think they link to - I've fixed too many duplicate pages, and links to disambig pages...) Seems harmless enough, why not prevent creation of a duplicate article? Noel (talk) 01:25, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Soft power

message: Isn't it another name for concensus (of mutual interest) ?
What we present as soft power for years is just the promise of the slap, and the guarantee the actor will get it no matter what if he doesn't comply.
This notion should be updated.
Originally it s the benefice of a mutual culture or goal over self-interest, but now ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.208.11.146 (talk) 11:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concensus 

message: Why are you not including india as example of soft power Doom marauder (talk) 06:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is india 

message: Creating this talk section because an editor reverted my changes. I had included the soft power rankings of China in the China section - the same rankings that are already cited in the lead section. I've listed the same rankings in the China soft power Wiki page, and nobody there raised any objection. 
The reason given for the removal was "Reinstating sourced edition". However, that content is already well sourced! These rankings are considered important and often cited in the media too. 
I suggest that it be included in the China section of this page. 
Honoredebalzac345 (talk) 20:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored your text describing the US as the only soft power superpower. That edit is good, sourced to the Brand Finance PDF. Looks that material got caught in the cross-hairs of a different edit war. Binksternet (talk) 23:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Including China's soft power rankings in China sub-section 

message: They are few errors in india section on the example of soft power.First of all most of the mathematical contribution done by india didn't had their origin in India.For example concept trigonometry, geometry and algebra was first developed by ancient Greeks, astronomy has its origin in Babylon.If you have any problem with it check the Wiki page of history of algebra, geometry, trigonometry etc..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obiwana (talk • contribs) 13:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  India  

message: It's note to upload scientific achievement of other countries not only india  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obiwana (talk • contribs) 14:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not mention scientific achievement of other countries only india
Talk:1AC

message: This reads like an actual debate that took place for a class - might be salvagable provided references to "my partner and I" and whatnot were removed, but in its current form it is not appropiate for Wikipedia.   StopTheFiling 23:50, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
:This reads more like a how-to anyway. Perhaps it should go to VfD anyway. --Dmcdevit 07:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest I'm not sure what this is supposed to be about in the first place, which is why I didn't go that route right away -- however I'm thinking about doing just that.  I'll wait and see if anything changes first.  StopTheFiling 17:21, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)  I see now, it's a how-to on a certain kind of debate style - what I said still stands though - I'll remove the neutrality notice and put some other notice there.  StopTheFiling 17:24, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
I think this page should be deleted entirely.  I tried to edit it down because of excess information about the format of a sample speech, but the existing policy debate page should cover it.  There is also a problem because policy debate is not the only form of debate which uses the label 1AC.  Would be easier just to gut it. Tfine80 18:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I put a merge tag back on this page. Policy debate covers this issue both in detail, and in context. This page is a confusing mixture of detail, "how to", and example, and I think the comments noted in the history file are good evidence of that.
Additionally, I found this article while slugging it out in the Dead-end pages. Nothing links here, and a redirect to Policy debate would direct any interest to a more complete collection of information. Bookandcoffee 01:14, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--Bookandcoffee(Leave msg.) 03:41, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Andy Duncan (footballer, born 1977)

message: Season	Matches	Goals	Yellow	Red
 97/98	19	0	3	0
 98/99	55/51	1	3	1
 99/00	15	1	0	0	Broke leg in October, out rest of season
 00/01	45/43	1	5	1	Injury in February?
 01/02	33/26	0	3	1	Injury in March?  Out rest of season
 02/03	33/30	1	4	1	Groin injury in February.  Out rest of season 
 03/04	41/40	2	1	1
 04/05	44	1/0	6	0
 	---	-	-	-
 	285	7	25	5
TomDestry 22:08, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cabinet collective responsibility

message: I don't have the reference to hand but there was public dissent from collective responsibility over the smoking ban in clubs in England before the UK Parliament voted in favour. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 18:10, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Smoking

message: As the previous section of this talk page states, the current articles do not establish what the difference is between Cabinet collective responsibility and Cabinet solidarity. How common is it to have one without the other? One might say that one is a consequence of the other; but such a nice distinction is  better discussed in a single article than either or both of two separate ones. jnestorius(talk) 12:40, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: Two way approach for cross checking of the functioning of the system. Single heads makes it authoritative whereas cross functional working style will create checks and balance by its nature similar to line managers or functional managers. It will help learn and develop steps taken by other two heads and suo motto. 
Thanking sincerely 
Pritam Das
Contact-7896419889
Email id-preetam94351@gmail.com
 Pritam94351 (talk) 01:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to have three heads in Indian system: Legislative head, Executive head and Grievance or Preferential head (Ombudsman).
Talk:Luzhniki Stadium

message: Name "Luzhniki" comes not from "meadow" (луг) but from profession horse shepherd and meadow caretaker (лужник).    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.165.173.131 (talk) 03:13, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong etymology

message: As I know, it was called Central Lenin Stadium (Russian:Центральный стадион имени В.И.Ленина). Cmapm 22:14, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Protocol Amending the Agreements, Conventions and Protocols on Narcotic Drugs concluded at The Hague on 23 January 1912, at Geneva on 11 February 1925 and 19 February 1925, and 13 July 1931, at Bangkok on 27 November 1931 and at Geneva on 26 June 1936

message: From WP:RfD:
* Protocol Amending the Agreements, Conventions and Protocols on Narcotic Drugs concluded at The Hague on 23 January 1912, at Geneva on 11 February 1925 and 19 February 1925, and 13 July 1931, at Bangkok on 27 November 1931 and at Geneva on 26 June 1936 → Protocol amending the Agreements, Conventions and Protocols on Narcotic Drugs, 1946. This page was moved after a VfD debate (here). The title is ridiculous, who on earth will search for something like this? Sjakkalle 12:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Imperial Crown of Austria

message: This article was quite difficult to translate because of some very specific words. Does anyone know how you properly refer to the arches of the crown? and how do you translate "Rechinen", which is a precious stone, correctly into english? Also if there are problems with the grammar or the syntax, feel free to correct it. Please do not change the heading of the this article. In German the crown is known as "Österreichische Kaiserkrone", which translates into Imperial Crown of Austria or Austrian Imperial Crown. User:antares911
Thanks for supplying the other name for those jewels, and clinching the translation by supplying the chemical formula.  J S Ayer 04:35, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: The currency of the Austro-Hungarian Empire is also sometimes called Austrian Crown, which is why Austrian crown redirects you to the article about the currency. But Austrian Crown is redirecting you to this article. Can someone implement a note at the top? I'm not sure how to do that. SkySilver (talk) 13:34, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:Tolna, North Dakota

message: "0.00% African American, 0.00% Asian, 0.00% Pacific Islander, 0.00% from other races (...) 0.00% of the population are Hispanic or Latino of any race." – then why mention them? this article looks like it was done by some script... Alensha 23:20, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Threads (television show)

message: Is there any particular reason why this isn't on Threads, which just redirects to Thread? There are, quite rightly, many pages linking to the former page, and it's the natural place to look - why is all this content here and not there (with a note saying something along the lines of "Threads can also have a number of other meanings, see Thread for more")? sheridan 23:22, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
:see Talk:Threads --Vamp:Willow 00:40, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions/Vote on city naming

message: Please write the numbers of the possibilities you'd choose, you might explain in discussion. You can choose more than one possibility (e.g. both for cities where names differs significantly and for cities where currently there is a minority), unless you choose first (both names for all cities) or the last (both names never used) possibility
I choose 3th and 5th suggestions, as this in my opinion would be the best compromise, and would include towns where this name was/is in actual use by local population or modern times official matters. DeirYassin 22:03, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote

message: Not so fast.  This survey has to conform with Wikipedia policy, as expressed in Wikipedia:Survey guidelines.  In particular, a single user has no right to unilaterally set up the survey and define all the questions. Balcer 22:46, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd strongly recommend to improve the Survey guidelines first - visit Template_talk:Gdansk-Vote-Notice#Constructive_proposal. Then, when this is fixed, we can carry out a vote here. Note that if we don't fix it, we are likely to end up in another quagmire like the Gdansk Vote, which seems to have failed to resolve the issue. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:25, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia policy on surveys
Talk:Leandro (footballer, born 1959)

message: My expertise is not in this area, but I'm guessing this guy is the same as Leonardo Nascimento de Araujo? If so, make the redirect. The JPS 23:31, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not the same. --DR31 (talk) 23:14, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Only in Brazil could a right back be as flamboyant as Leandro. In 1982, he was the star-studded Brazilian team's unsung hero, a secret weapon capable of delivering decisive crosses to the forwards, or indeed taking a pop himself. He also had an ability to dribble past players and probably covered more ground than any other player in the team - he could often be found in the outside left position, yet would get back to defence when needed. A principled man, he refused to go to Mexico after a disagreement with the coach Santana. Their loss.
----
In my opinion, the above edit by 62.69.57.130 contains POV issues substantial enough to remove this from the article.
If someone more familiar with the subject matter can add to and rewrite the above in a way that feels less like a "glowing review" of the person and more like a factual account, then feel free to do so. 
--BinaryTed 18:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from article
Talk:Environmental causes of obesity

message: This is a well-written general account of obesity, but should be trimmed down to reflect its title, with the remainder being a candidate for merge with the main obesity article. JFW | T@lk 23:33, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a badly written essay (see first edit). It really should be deleted. Justinc 00:20, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

message: How can choosing to take less exercise and choosing to eat fast food be considered an "environmental cause"?  Only if people are not responsible for their own actions.  That obesity is a disease according to some in the rich West is so that drugs can be prescribed!  (You cannot get a drug approved unless it is for a "disease".)  Thirty years ago it wasn't a disease!  What's changed?  Personal behaviour.  As the article says:  We eat more, we eat more rubbish, we exercise less.  The article also says our behaviour has not changed!  Contradiction.  Doubtless there are also "environmental causes" BUT what are they?  Paul Beardsell 02:50, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental causes
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-06-06/Global downtime

message: "Neutelligent has huge fiber commitments with the following carriers, totalling over 4.5 gigs: UUNET, Level 3, and EPiK. By doing so, that will ensure 0:00 down time, not 1%, we mean 0% downtime." 
Oops, I guess that 0% is rounded or something. Smyjpmu 23:52, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Bald Mountain (Idaho)

message: Hello all...
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Baldy Pictures 001.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue. The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive. It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard. As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article. If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:19, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement