lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yapeyú

message: From User_talk:Tobias Conradi
You seam to be taking disambiguation to a wide extreme. To change Yapeyú into a disambiguation page only because there is a river named Guaviraví River, that was once named Yapeyu, and that doesn't even have a page in Wikipedia seams to be not only useless but anoying. Keep it simple. Mariano(t/c) 08:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree with you in the reasoning but not to the extreme. The reason you see so many articles in that format is because I've been creating them by the dozens, and disambiguating whenever another city/town had the same name (in the world). "X, Province" tends to be unambiguous, but it's unneeded if there's only one "X" in the world (other than e.g. a river, which everyone will look for at "X River"). I don't think anyone needs a disambiguation between a city, a department and a river. Redirects, those are a different thing altogether; you can keep the "X, Province" format if you redirect from the "X" article (if "X" is unambiguous). I'm not criticizing your work, only the fact that you've been doing it all over without asking anyone if they thought it was OK. We have a WikiProject in order to coordinate those kinds of changes. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 13:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: dab
Talk:Earl Gladstone Hunt Jr.

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Earl Jr and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#Earl Jr until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 17:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Earl Jr" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tobler's first law of geography

message: probably Waldo R. Tobler has read geostatistics book this law come from geostatistic  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.89.2.194 (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess this so-called "law" is too general and non-falsifiable to be useful. 79.139.206.248 (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

message: The first law of geography is one of the most fundamental concepts in geography today. It is perhaps the most significant outcome of the quantitative revolution. This article should be heavily elaborated on to reflect that. The law relates directly to the concept of distance decay and spatial autocorrelation. Fundamentally, it is the first assumption we must make when conducting spatial analysis. 
I suggest that a section detailing different studies that have referenced the first law might be a good place to start building the foundation and literature behind it. Elaboration on statistics that test it, such as Moran's I and Getis Ord Gi* would also be good. I'll be working on this as a project, but would appreciate help from anyone that wants to jump in. GeogSage  (⚔Chat?⚔)  07:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Elaborating on the first law of geography
Talk:Earl Wilson (baseball)

message: OK, so the debate went against my proposal (though I'm not sure the closer noticed this: I was proposing "Earl Wilson" again for this person).  Who's going to tidy up all the links which point to the dab page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Earl_Wilson , most of which appear to be links intending to reach the baseball player? PamD (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links  needing tidying 
Talk:Conserved name

message: I'm happy to see that "conserved name" and "nomen conservandum" have been re-united in a single article, although it does still need some cleanup.  I would note (and this has previously been pointed out by Brya) that the term "nomen conservandum" is not, strictly speaking, defined by the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. I suppose the definition is expected to be implicit or self-explanatory in the discussion of the term and the concept within the text of the Code, but this is one of many areas where the ICBN is quite exasperating. (Nomen nudum is another term that is used in the Code without being formally defined.) MrDarwin 15:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:Coastal geography

message: added section on drift and an external link KonaScout 23:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added

message: Template:Coastal geography lists a lot of landforms, many of which are similar (e.g. peninsula, headland, cape).  It would be helpful to have an overview here dividing this list into a hierarchy, and giving guidance on how to distinguish similar landforms. -- Beland (talk) 17:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Overview of landforms needed
Talk:Édouard Stern

message: shouldnt there be something about the latex suit he died in?
It says that he died in a latex suit. Not sure what else could be added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.186.242 (talk) 22:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He was not shot by bullet, stern inhaled talc powder this come into his lungs, everywhere was talc powder in air , I think breathe play was enough to get heart attack 2A02:A460:3E5B:1:F12D:AB04:E233:9C04 (talk) 19:48, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Anaphylaxis is an acute and fatal systemic allergic reaction to an allergen, and it can be an unpredictable and life-threatening cause during the bondage session and sensation play by leather hand gloves . 88.159.240.190 (talk) 09:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  latex suit 

message: I've removed Maximillian under his son's as it is not listed in the Stern family tree and the source for it is a blog site that itself references the Daily Mail - not a reliable source. If anyone can find any better sources, I have left the part about his son in the text but it really needs to be re-worded as it sounds like Edouard killed the child, but the blog site blames the nanny.
Asimoth (talk) 10:46, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the statement regarding the child clearly states that Stern ordered the nanny to kill the child.  That is a pretty shocking allegation to make with no source citation. I am surprised that it is still here.  The above comment states that the part relating to the child was deleted in September 2022 - but as of today it is still there.  Has someone added it back?  There is no source citation that he ordered the nanny to kill the child. That should be deleted or changed. Beanlowry (talk) 19:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspicious sources
Talk:Ministry of propaganda

message: I don't think this article should exist.  It is not clear enough to me that there is such a thing as a "ministry of propaganda" in a general sense.  The historical government entities that can be described as such don't amount to a thing in general, like a legislature or whatever - they have been too different.  It's a made-up concept without a literature to back it up. Articles about specific gov't agencies that have done this are sufficient.Rlitwin 15:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To get a soapbox for the Roberts quote? Weregerbil 15:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 2006 

message: Those of you editors who pwn this article should explain why this article is not Ministry of information since the article itself says that is the current term and Ministry of propaganda has fallen out of favor. This seems to be another MOI attack that has degraded Wikipedia for several years. You use the anachronistic term to conceal the article. By the way the article should do more than mention the obvious reference to "1984" and its Ministry of truth which purpose was to destroy information as is being done on Wikipedia. The pwners on the wiki now are just cutting obvious chunks from articles. No subterfuge to even conceal their attacks anymore. The article on fleas, and the one on warts to name a couple others besides this one. I blame the pwners because they attack any editor harassing for the most persnickety thing "citation required" but whole obvious chunks missing with not a whisper. 
98.164.81.169 (talk) 10:02, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2019
Talk:Hydrography

message: This content of this page Hydrography is accurate, but difficult to read because of its style, in particular, its use of the future tense, rather than present. Might we change the tense? perlcapt (talk) 00:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: Overview section completely missing citations, added a tag. Balle010 (talk) 05:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources tag 

message: wide overlap fgnievinski (talk) 04:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given no support and an implied objection, with not support for the proposal and stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 05:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Hydrographic survey]] into [[Hydrography]]
Talk:Out of focus, The seen target

message: Even though on the page it states that Naruto didnt have friends, he still hung out with Kiba, Chouji and Shikamaru. It was shown in many flashbacks throughout the series.
Like you said, he did play with Kiba, Choji, and Shikamaru. But, it was shown in a different flashback at some point during Naruto vs Sasuke (I don't have the exact episode number/chapter) that as Naruto was playing with them, their parents pulled them away from him with their backs turned. So while Naruto was their friend for a short time, their parents managed to convince them not to play with the little jinchuriki afterwards. 75.24.92.170 23:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto as a child Trivia
Talk:Edward von Kloberg III

message: Added life section. It seems a little simple now, but it is a good start at least. Coralshin (talk) 06:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 
Talk:Ted Leather

message: This paragraph states TWICE that L. was a freemason.  Once is enough. --dunnhaupt (talk) 20:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career 

message: In the career section it says "He quit Westminster in 1964 because of illness. Poor health and the low pay for MPs forced Leather to retire from Parliament at the 1964 general election and enter business." This seems a bit clumsy and confusing. The first sentence implies he left parliament solely for health reasons, but the very next sentence seems to contradict that by adding an additional reason - money (and by developing it further it arguably adds more weight to the financial issues importance as a factor). It also seems silly to state twice in a row that health was a factor in the departure. Unfortunately this text is not cited, so I am not sure which sentence is more accurate. However I am tempted to suggest merging to something like "Illness and the low pay for MPs saw Leather retire from Parliament at the 1964 general election and enter business." However I think a source to confirm this would be useful before making such a change. Dunarc (talk) 23:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing text re his leaving parliament
Talk:Behavioral geography

message: Hello, Editors interested in further developing this article may find useful background resources at this webpage. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 

message: Hi there! Your subject is indeed very interesting and particularly the role of mental maps. The book written by Lynch, "The Image of the City", seemed like an interesting read, so I searched for it only to find out that it was not written by David Lynch, a filmmaker, but Kevin Lynch. --SnoogyWoogy (talk) 00:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Lynch author of "The Image of the City" mistake
Talk:Political geography

message: Why is this picture here, and what does the caption mean?  The Brandenburg Gate was not of the Berlin Wall; it is a much older monument, and the Wall happened to pass near it. —Tamfang (talk) 19:26, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Brandenburg Gate of the Berlin Wall in 1961. 

message: Under "Areas of Study," it looks like the most recent publication listed is one from 2007 by Peter Taylor.  This is not a topic I know much about, but I wonder if anything else notable has come out in the past 10 years and if so, whether it should be included.  Thanks!  Boundsbe (talk) 07:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Areas of Study"--needs an update?
Talk:Akram Yari

message: This article seems very slanted toward a pro-communist pov. For example, the caption on the photo identifies Yari as "martyred", and the first sentence of the article calls Yari "...one of the most phenomenol theorists...".ChardingLLNL 16:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've addressed some of the POV issues. User:24.43.245.193 is obviously a sympathizer of the C(M)PA, and has introduced pro-C(M)PA POV in different articles. --Soman 11:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Request for Comments
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue.--Guy Macon (talk) 09:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Smith v. Maryland

message: List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 59 states that this case took place in 18something! 68.39.174.238 02:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trouble 

message: There may be many Smith v. Maryland cases. This is from volume 442, not 59.
Bob 22:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong volume!
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Living People Patrol

message: I propose merging these pages into Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography.  Specifically, if nobody objects, I would like to WP:MOVE this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Living People Patrol (along with the talk page's archive) and then redirect this talk page here.  That way, if anyone goes looking for help, they'll have a better chance of getting a response.
Please let me know if anyone objects. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, since there has been no response either at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography or here, I will move and redirect these pages now. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging up to a bigger group
Talk:Deathblow (comics)

message: I'm the first one here? 166.216.130.74 (talk) 06:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No one said anything yet? 

message: The latest Wildstorm Universe has a new Michael Cray, "The Wildstorm" by Warren Ellis. (2017)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.150.24 (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Version of Character 
Talk:Alameda Community Learning Center

message: Someone has recently vandalized the controversy section by deleting it, I strongly advise that this person be warned or temporarily banned. -El Maxo 19:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism to the Controversy section 

message: This page has been trying to convince people of the "Annual Wikipedia Vandalism Faire." Which is not true, my dumb friends have been making accounts to mess with this article and vandalise it. Due ignore the controversy if it comes up again
Also, The vandalism in the athletics sections was very uncalled for.
By the way, Our mascot does not exist, we dont have one. It is not a couch, and it is not "Todd, the dancing now and later." Diggity-diggity-doom 19:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...Its a real thing. In fact, the Wikipedia Vandalism Club is responible for even adding the information about it in the first place. I, myself, am friends with the club leader and several prominent members. Next time check your sources before you delete vandalism. -El Maxo 19:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Vandalisms 

message: LOL, I FIXED VANDALIZM...RAWR OMG, HE WAS LIKE RAWR, SO I WAS LIKE RAWR 01:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IM N UR PAJE 

message: I believe each section is supposed to be indicated with two equals signs and not one. with one it makes it look very large. Skhatri2005 01:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 

message: After all of the changes i have made to the page, i believe there is no reason to edit it any further. I suggest keeping this page on a pretty regular check to make sure the vandals to not add false information. Though maxman280 had a great cover story, it was not true. 24.143.154.203 08:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It IS true, and although you may not believe it, I realise now that it is not notable and therby does not belong. Perhaps another more notable event in the future will occur that deserves a place on the Wiki. -El Maxo 16:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistent vandalism 

message: Is an explanation of what this school is, what it does different and why it works.
P.S. Sorry about all that vandalism I did back then.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlmAxo (talk • contribs) 08:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What this article needs
Talk:Agavoideae

message: Genus Eremocrinum is not included on this list.  Can anyone say if this is because of a controvery about its inclusion or about the integrity of the genus itself?  NaySay 16:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If only we had Eremocrinum to explain... :-) The genus seems well-attested by external sources such as FNA, but placed in Liliaceae, while Wikispecies seems to use Lohmueller's page that puts it in Anthericaceae and then includes that in Agavaceae. The genus should probably be mentioned in both family articles so it can be found. Stan 14:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the Flora of North America volume, which I believe follows the Cronquist system (thus Liliaceae s.l.) and in the introduction they provide an alternate classification placing the various genera of Liliaceae s.l. in various segregate families that have been recognized more recently, with Eremocrinum in Anthericaceae (which I guess places it in Agavaceae in the APG II system?).  I've added it to the genus list. MrDarwin 14:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's a bit aggravating that "Agavaceae" redirects to this page.  APG III is one classifification, widely but not universally accepted, and the concept of Agavaceae still exists and is still accepted by some taxonomists.  It would be useful to have a separate article on Agavaceae, as a historic and/or alternative classification, including its circumscription (which is not necessarily the same as Agavoideae), who still accepts it as a family and why, as well as why it is rolled into Asparagaceae by APG III (a family circumscription which I must stress has not been universally accepted or adopted!) 160.111.254.17 (talk) 15:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agavaceae
Talk:Mohawk Trail

message: I removed the last part of the following sentence:
Today the Mohawk Trail is part of Massachusetts Route 2, which was created as one of the United States' first scenic highways, and the New York State Thruway.
For three reasons: First is that the linked source says, "The most famous of these was possibly the Iroquois/Mohawk Trail. which was a 600 km beaten path between Buffalo and Albany in New York State and which is now New York Route 5" not the Thruway. Second is that the sentence was very awkwardly constructed. And third is that the entire rest of the article is about the Mohawk Trail in MA. If someone would like to re-write the article with New York in mind through out, that would be great. But as it stands now, it's just more confusing to say that the trail is the western part of MA-2 and all of NY-5 and then in the very next sentence say, "[it goes] from Orange, Massachusetts to Williamstown, Massachusetts, for about 65 miles (105 km) through the Berkshire mountains."
Onlynone (talk) 03:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mohawk Trail in New York
Talk:Hope of the States

message: I'm not sure why people keep removing my perfectly encyclopedic edits. Is there some way we can lock this page to prevent vandalism?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.113.232 (talk • contribs) 09:36, 1 September 2006
:-It really is getting stupid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodhorsehymn (talk • contribs) 09:45, 1 September 2006
::Please add a reference for the new Northwestern band mention, thanks. :) Banaticus (talk) 21:49, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Maybe in the infobox, there should be an associated acts section that includes "troubles" "the northwestern" and "blocks" Phil Nolte (talk) 12:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Associated Acts
Talk:RAF Mullaghmore

message: Which is the correct location, because there are two former airfields on the west of the river - 
one here , and another a little south of the first - .  Use the FlashEarth links, and select MS VE maps (the resolution for Ireland is quite poor!) -- Teutonic Tamer 19:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct location ??
Talk:JHC FS Aldergrove

message: Wasn't there a record-breaking transatlantic flight by an English Electric Canberra that took off from RAF Aldergrove?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starviking (talk • contribs) 09:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record flights? 
Talk:RAF Ballyhalbert

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Text added by this editor duplicated at least in part material from http://web.archive.org/web/20070126094725/http://www.ballyhalbert.co.uk/ (subpage:  	RAF Ballyhalbert). Other content added by this contributor may have been copied from other sources and has been removed in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. Content added by other contributors subsequent to the introduction of this material can be restored if it does not merge with this text to create a derivative work. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:21, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem
Talk:Gaylord Powless

message: Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
The information comes from other Wikipedia pages and a page of lacrosse writings. These sources are neutral and there is no noted bias. 
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
The information is up to date. More information could be added about his family, how he died from cancer, there are many awards he won that are missing, 
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic, nothing was out of place. Katreena Hadden Thursday March 9, 5:16 pm Katreena Hadden (talk) 22:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled