lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Daran Norris

message: Didn’t it once say that he was a Christian? Austin012599 (talk) 02:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it did. But bio info like that needs to be well-sourced to merit inclusion in a WP:BLP... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:14, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 

message: Whenever I try to remove this unsourced credit, the table always breaks. What should I do??? Homechallenge55 (talk) 03:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Try using the Visual Editor. I'm normally not a fan of it, but it's great for editing tables. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 03:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried the Visual Editor, and it worked. Thanks. Homechallenge55 (talk) 04:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ace Combat 6 

message: This issue here is WP:BLPPRIVACY. We need a strong source to verify a WP:DOB. A tweet from Nickelodeon likely does not qualify as a strong enough source. If you can find a social media post from Norris himself, that might be good enough as per WP:ABOUTSELF. Failing that, we use what we currently have. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norris' "Exact" [[WP:DOB]] 

message: "But he has a husband" - yes, from a strictly common sense POV we can surmise he's non-straight. However, BLP does require sourcing in-article for categories, and I could find no valid source stating his sexuality. This change has been reverted twice already without proper explanation. 2803:4600:1116:1457:B493:8805:6F79:1311 (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No proper sourcing on LGBT Categories
Talk:Ronaldo Giovanelli

message: Aside from obvious formatting issues, this has POV problems, and maybe it should be a disambiguation page. I am not a subject matter expert, however, so I'll leave it for someone who is.  -- Cleduc 00:07, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Somdomite

message: Recently inserted:
;"To confuse matters even further, although the version above is generally accepted, there is some doubt about what Queensberry wrote on the card, since his handwriting was virtually unreadable.  The doorman at the Albemarle Club though he was describing Wilde as a "ponce"."
Has "doubt' about "somdomite" previously been asserted in print? Is this, as the insertion says, merely "to confuse matters even further"? Who discusses this as an issue? --Wetman 00:08, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's addressed on p. 438 of Ellman's biography (which isn't recent!). Ellman says that the hall porter, Sidney Wright, was unable to read the card, that Wilde probably read it as "To Oscar Wilde, ponce and Somdomite", that Queensberry actually wrote "To Oscar Wilde posing Somdomite" but testified in court that he had written "To Oscar Wilde posing as a Somdomite".  - Nunh-huh 00:32, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: There we are. Perhaps you'd enter these tidbits, when you have time and patience. Then we can avoid confusing matters further, as the saying is. --Wetman 02:14, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: I second Adam's opinion. Dedicating an encyclopedia entry to a specific solecism does not seem quite right to me, all the more as, IMHO, it is a side issue even in the case at hand (the Wilde-Queensberry case). Should every barbarism be considered worth describing and commenting on in itself? --S.Camus 16:34, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:List of alumni of Jesuit educational institutions

message: Anonymous post added Goebbels as Alumnus of Kerkrade Jesuit Seminary (Netherlands).
I have serious doubts about this. As this could be politacally motivated, I removed the entry. If it would be correct, please justify here with reference to source material.
--Xaviervd 14:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goebbels 

message: Thsi article was an awful mess of entries written in different styles, and mostly missing citation of nationality, not to speak when writing things such "NBA hall of fame" without further explanations. What is NBA? Do you think all people around the world can known it at first glance? Further work to standardize needed
 --Attilios 23:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Awfulness

message: totally disagree on the 'awfulness'.  The entries are, for the most part, quite clear.  'NBA' can easily be linked to the wikipedia entry on the NBA, which should satisfactorily deal with the concerns above.  Besides, presumably one wouldn't want to spend a lot of time on this list reading an explanation of all the various associations.  Overall, this list is at least a fascinating wikipedia entry and for some, a tremendous resource  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.83.178.10 (talk) 07:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: not awful

message: This article has a serious verifiability problem. There are currently 4 references supplied, and the list, by my count, includes 549 people. A good number of them are still living. So there is less than 1% coverage of reliable sources. In order to verify each one of these entries, someone would need to search sources for the name and terms such as "graduated" "attended" "alumn(us|i|ae)", and then cross-reference the names of any schools mentioned against, e.g. List of Jesuit educational institutions, which has just shy of 800 entries listed. Only then could that source be cited and that entry retained in this list. So, I am inclined to solicit for people who would be inclined to take on this project. Elizium23 (talk) 04:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifiability problem
Talk:Ragnar Tørnquist

message: I'm not sure if Ragnar is married, his blog is still quite ambiguous to whether or not he is married to his partner, and only seems clear that they live together.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.114.135.25 (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Substantial interview for anyone who wants to expand this article:
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2008/08/18/ragnar-t%C3%B8rnquist-on-storytelling/
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2008/08/19/ragnar-t%C3%B8rnquist-on-the-longest-journey/
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2008/08/20/ragnar-t%C3%B8rnquist-on-dreamfall-faith/
In response to the anon's old question above: he is married as he mentions his wife in the interview.  Wickethewok (talk) 22:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A huge thanks!! I'll see what I can do with it. --Koveras ☭ 13:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 3 part interview
Talk:Christian Broadcasting Network

message: This is a pathetic article concerning a broadcasting operation the size of CBN. It should be treated as a broadcasting article with lists of stations, relays, cable systems, satellites, studios, etc. MPLX/MH 01:48, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article should discuss the history of the organization.  As it stands, a reader would not know that CBN started out as a radio service, when Robertson purchased the old Rural Radio Network in upstate New York.  121a0012 04:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Any thoughts to add the section in regards to CBN and the Arab-Israeli issue? Pat Robertson seems to support Israel according to the 2006 NY Time article. 
*
--69.157.127.100 (talk) 04:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pat Robertson and Israel 

message: Most of the text in the article is inadequately supported by references. The majority of it is original research. — O'Dea (talk) 05:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very poorly referenced
Talk:Ā

message: I am removing the bit about first tone A.  Technically it's correct, but really, a line over anything indicates that it's a first tone.
69.86.189.171 (talk) 17:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pinyin 

message: The second paragraph says Ā is a separate letter “after A and before B” in Latvian. But the third paragraph says Ā is a “long A” in languages including Latvian. This is unclear and seems contradictory. 03:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It can represent a long A, yet be sorted as an unrelated letter. There is no contradiction. ï¿½ (talk) 12:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, there is another contradiction: we have “comes after A and before B in alphabet” and then “In alphabetical order it is ordered equal with A”. ï¿½ (talk) 12:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction? 

message: In the International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration, Ā represents the open back unrounded vowel, आ, not to be confused with the similar Devanagari character for the mid central vowel, अ.
This is put confusingly. आ and अ contrast in vowel length and not quality although the quality might differ phonetically in many indic languages. 134.76.61.232 (talk) 18:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Devanagari
Talk:Radames Pera

message: On 9 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  There was no consensus.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Rad Pera for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 02:06, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
This is a vanity article and should be deleted. Eye.earth 23:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vfd

message: To Radames Pera, his full name.  At some point if I get to add more to this page, the "Perá" within the article will be changed to "Pera", as I can find no other source online that renders his name with an "á". Tarc 04:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Moved 

message: This is just a awful biography. I am going to clean it up. It is full of praise and fan cruft . I am going to remove anything without a source.--BeckiGreen (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awful. 

message: In the intro it states that Pera "is the only living regular cast member" of the TV series Kung Fu'.
This is not technically accurate.
Keith Carradine who played a teenage Kwai Chang Caine in flashbacks -- just like Pera did playing a very young Caine -- is also still alive.
As such, I think that sentence should either be removed or re-worded.
Thoughts? 2600:8800:786:A300:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 12:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kung Fu
Talk:The End...

message: On the cover, the album is clearly titled The End... With three dots. This should certainly be mentioned somewhere in the intro. The article should not be renamed to The End... however. Whether it is officially called The End... or just titled like that on the album cover, almost every website refers to the album as The End, without the dots. - Face 18:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The End with dots

message: The track listing says "forgot", but the body of the article repeatedly uses "forget" in the title. I checked the back cover and it says "forgot". So which is it?--109.196.118.133 (talk) 12:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  You forgot to answer
Talk:First Moroccan Crisis

message: why why why did this happen what are your veiws???
The article has some info on motivations for the crisis, but fails to explain the most important part: What was it?  What did Germany do to provoke the crisis, and what were the reactions? Could use serious expansion.
Dpenn89 (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

message: Is pretty "meh" to be honest, and there are some grammatical and tone-related issues that could be sorted out in the article. Read the first paragraph and you'll know what I'm referring to! Cheers. 90.216.129.115 (talk) 06:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The English of this article 

message: This link doesn't seem relevant to the article - the linked article is about a garrison in Tangier over 200 years previously, when it was an independent entity. I'm deleting the link for now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by V. Stevko (talk • contribs) 07:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tangier Garrison 

message: I've removed the word 'secret' from the Background section. This may be partly, but only partly, in error.  The provisions of the Anglo-French agreement of April 8, 1904 pertaining to French actions in Morocco were made public at the time, per both Grey of Fallodon and Entente Cordiale. I don't have a source for the Franco-Spanish agreement though.--V. Stevko (talk) 08:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secrecy of Anglo-French and Franco-Spanish agreements 

message: I've rewritten the lead paragraph, attempting to explain what happened, why it happened, & why it matters. The rest of the article needs work (and possibly the new lead as well), but I hope this will provide something to build on. --V. Stevko (talk) 08:42, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Paragraph
Talk:Lazar Berman

message: Note that Berman did indeed play Chopin and even record some pieces fairly late in his life. For details, see the discography at: http://home.swipnet.se/bjorn_ostlund/berman.htm  (27 March 2005)
Clarification of chopin quote done> Berman did indeed publicly play Chopin after his loss at the Chopin competition; the quote left unmodified leaves an impression of an attitude towards repertoire that is childish and unprofessional, both characteristics untypical of Berman.  (25 January 2006)
Why isn't the quote cited in some way?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.65.249.173 (talk) 03:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted the unreferenced quote. Obviously, Chopin appears in his discography, including a DG recording of Chopin's Polonaises made when he was in his 40s. As for programming it in concert, I heard him play Chopin's Sonata, Op. 35, in Cleveland's Severance Hall in 1976.MisterCSharp (talk) 12:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Played Chopin?

message: The article says, "He had the endurance to play three concertos or sonatas in one night. . ."  Can we have a reference, and more specific information?  Playing three or more sonatas would be perfectly common unless they were particularly big sonatas.  Three concertos would be less impressive if they were by Mozart than if they were by Liszt or Chopin (or some combination, since there are only two of each. . .).  Chick Bowen 03:57, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three concertos?
Talk:Unceded territory

message: I'm not sure if it makes sense to speak of Native Americans holding "title" to their lands. I believe that land titles are a peculiarly European invention. ISTR that for most, if not all, Native American peoples, the concept of owning the land was so utterly foreign to them that they were easily swindled into signing away their claims to their land because they simply did not comprehend what was being bargained.
However, I'm not entirely sure how to rephrase it more accurately. Hard to avoid being tatuological with the title. Something like "Land to which the native peoples never ceded ownership" or that they never ceded their right to live on and off of the land. older≠wiser 02:49, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
:How does this relate or compare to land claims?  If it's essentially the same concept, then these are disputed land titles and the wording should reflect this to remain NPOV.  Perhaps the phrase "the title is still held" should be changed to "the title is alleged to still be held" or "the equivalent of a title is still held" or something along those lines to keep it neutral. --Ds13 02:54, 2005 Apr 19 (UTC)
::I don't think there are necessarily disputes over "unceded territory" (there may be in some cases though). The description at land claims does seem similar, but I'm not terribly knowledgeable in this area. My only quibble is with using the term "title" to describe the ownership of the native peoples to the land. I just found Title, which elaborates a little bit. But I still think it sounds just a little odd to describe aboriginal land claims in terms of their holding title to the land. I don't think aboriginal peoples conceived of land ownership in a way that fits neatly under the rubric of holding "title" to property. older≠wiser 01:05, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
:::I agree, "title" sounds a bit unusual (thus my suggestion for "equivalent of title").  
:::Does anyone have examples of unceded territory?  The reason I believe it is disputed is, as I read the definition in the article, it sounds like there could be significant amounts of land in this category which has now fallen into private or government hands for other uses and I'm sure if push came to shove, there would be a dispute.  Until I can see some examples though, this is just my uneducated guess. --Ds13 15:59, 2005 Apr 20 (UTC)
I'm interested in this discussion going further.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:FB19:B400:2174:CA03:9B83:339C (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Sonic Adventure DX

message: Does anyone know if the "DX" in the title refers to "Deluxe" or "Director's Cut"?  I haven't heard any official word on this, and I assumed it meant the former.
:: Director's Cut --Mateusc 23:13, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It refers to Directors cut.--Zxcvbnm 00:12, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Sonic Adventure and Sonic Adventure DX are essentially the same game, so i think it should be merged--Zxcvbnm 00:12, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Andreas Vesalius

message: I seemed to get a bias sense from some of the wording used when referring to Galen’s work compared to Vesalius. It mentions in the medical career and accomplishment section that Galen assumed a lot of his work based on the assumptions from animals, and basically that Vesalius’ information trumps his. But I think Galen’s deserves a better perspective and view for his work to prevent bias. 
Also for paragraph 4 in the section of “Imperial physician and death”, they say “Some said”. But who is that pertaining too? That same information is sourced from a Dutch language reference which is hard to validate. A lot of information seems to not be cited. Mitch8335 (talk) 02:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Few Suggestions

message: poo 2601:204:C001:3A70:9CC9:5089:AE99:9B8 (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: heheheha 2601:204:C001:3A70:9CC9:5089:AE99:9B8 (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: oooooooffffffff 2601:204:C001:3A70:9CC9:5089:AE99:9B8 (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: aaaaaawwwwwhhhhhhhhhhhh 2601:204:C001:3A70:9CC9:5089:AE99:9B8 (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  poo
Talk:Ragamuffin War

message: Hey guys, I am here to help fix the article by including more sources and maybe expanding some of the sections. What other ideas do you think the article needs?Dnaugle21 (talk) 05:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Help Ideas 

message: The most glaring deficiency in this article is its coverage of the last several years of the war, with this period being described by the original author as entirely hopeless for the rebels and as one characterized by political maneuvers and negotiations. Did large-scale military conflict persist during this time, or did the so-called "war" now merely consist of sporadic skirmishes in the countryside? Moreover, the question of what prompted the Empire to be so magnanimous and willing to negotiate with rebel leaders should also be addressed; if the latter party's situation was so dire, why would their opponent decide it necessary to make peace and produce such generous concessions? Finally, who were the "Ragamuffins" for which the war was named? It is established in the existing article that they earned this nickname through their attire, but to which classes did they belong? I mainly ask this question due to the inequality of land ownership throughout most of Brazil during this period, and the resulting uncertainty I possess as to whether these aggrieved men were primarily landowners, farm laborers, ranchers, cowboys, mercenaries, or of some other profession. Jackh18 (talk) 06:35, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/London 4

message: Consensus seems to be The Archery Tavern 4 Bathurst Street, London, W2 2SD 020 7402 4916 and I have just phoned them. Food served 12 noon to 9pm on Sundays.  They do not have a function room. LoopZilla 13:35:48, 2005-09-05 (UTC)
What time .. 1pm? as above? -max rspct 17:27, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.
Oh, arse. Sorry, should have made this clear here when writing my email message three weeks ago.
James F. (talk) 13:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location, Location, Location
Talk:Kevin of Glendalough

message: I aagree entirely that the old material was entirely unsuitable.  The article is now, as all first name articles should be, about a person or disambiguation of persons known only by the name.  I.e. if there are twelve people known only as "Bob," then the article Bob should be a dab, not an "article" on the folk fancies of what "Bob" means.  In this case, I could find only one "Kevin (no last name)," and that's the saint.  (Saints grab most of the first name-only articles, I suppose.)  Now there should be no more transwiki discussion. Geogre 03:44, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alteration 

message: Ive heard of a saint kevin, he live half his life in a tree because a bird laid an egg in his hand, is this the same guy? Blacksmith2 08:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tree Guy? 

message: According to the traditional song, The Glendalough Saint, at least as sung by The_Dubliners, it was a lake not a patch of nettles that Caitlin was thrown into.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.61.244 (talk) 21:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nettles? 

message: St Kevins bed is not a dolmen but a manmade cave in the cliff overlooking the upper lake Sensibleken (talk) 15:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, dating from about 2000BC.  and its unlikely that Kevin ever "lived" there.  So, change it ClemMcGann (talk) 00:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Kevin's Bed 
Talk:Fort Garry

message: James, can you clarify for me what was meant by lower Fort Garry, which is frequently mentioned? Fawcett5 03:32, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is another fort close to Upper Fort Garry.  Check out Lower Fort Garry  -- JamesTeterenko 04:41, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lower Fort Garry
Talk:Copyright Expiration Day

message: I was searching for an article on "expiration", of the non-physiological kind. The article on "expiration" contains no hint of another sense of the word, but I eventually landed on Copyright Expiration Day. This page redirects to United States copyright law, but that article contains no use of the word "expiration", nor of "expire", nor of "expiry." For that matter, it doesn't contain the word "day." It seems like a redirect should only be to an article that covers the subject. (What I was actually trying to find was a discussion of expiration dates as the last day of validity or coverage or effectiveness vs. the first day of the lack of same). I'd recommend deleting this page altogether, since anyone searching for "Copyright Expiration Day" is bound to be disappointed, and anyone searching for "copyright" will find the other page. Jim 17:02, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this page exist at all?
Talk:University Avenue (Toronto)

message: Hello? There's only one unambiguous University Avenue in the world? That's not true even at the English-speaking country, North American, Canadian, and (probably) provincial level. --Calton | Talk 03:40, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Discussion at Talk:List of roads in Toronto, Ontario Eco84 | Talk 00:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions