lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of Jerusalem

message: In the "Late Antiquity" section, Jerusalem mural depicting the Cardo during the Byzantine period, why is there a kid in sneakers and a backwards baseball cap? 50.45.243.241 (talk) 07:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we talk about that mural? 

message: WikiProject Navigation templates participants (AnemoneProjectors, Painting17, Sm8900, Llewee, Wil540 art), Hello, I added Jerusalem to Template:Ancient states and regions of the Levant because under Abdi-Heba it was a kingdom. I would like to make sure that this (and not the main article about the city) is the right article to add the template, because I don't see any navigation templates here. Thanks in advance, פעמי-עליון (talk) 11:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @פעמי-עליון that sounds totalyl fine to me. I encourage you to go ahead and do so. Sm8900 (talk) 14:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Sm8900! Can you please do it? This page is protected and I'm not an extended confirmed user... פעמי-עליון (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Oops, didn't notice, I am not used to English wikipedia; thank you both! פעמי-עליון (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient states and regions of the Levant 

message: In the section about the Israelite period, at the end of the fourth paragraph, this is found:
According to the bible, Jehoshaphat of Judah was allied to Ahab of the Northern Kingdom of Israel at this time.
The fourth word should be capitalized in agreement with the rest of the instances in the article. Dismalscholar (talk) 19:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo request
Talk:Randroid

message: I will make a smal change to this, if no-one minds. I have heard the word "randroid" emplyed by other Objectivists about Objectivists of the more zealous and dogmatic type.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Svein Olav Nyberg (talk • contribs) 
:"I have heard" doesn't rally meet the criteria of WP:CITE, I'm afraid. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 23:10, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm adding an  tag.--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 13:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, there are sources, albeit internet ones, quoting people.--The ikiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说 話し parlar) 13:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

message: This is just my interpretation, but the second paragraph seems blatently biased against young people, stating that young readers who "lack reasoned arguements" could be described as "Randroids". This statement appears to both make the assumption that young people are inherently unable to understand fully philosophy, and that all individuals who are just picking up on Ms. Rand's philosophy are of a younger age group. The context of that paragraph depicts the notion that young people are easily led by any new ideas that they initially find appealing, and as such are also less able to think independently than older individuals, as proven fact and as such presents an over-generalization to those who read this article. Though I will agknowlege that in a vast majority of situations, people's ability to think independently increases with age, that does not mean that all individuals have similar levels of independent thought, which is to say that it is humanly possible for a younger individual could have better reasoning skills than an older individual. I do not feel fully confident in deleting the paragraph, as it may have a valid point to make, I simply think that someone should: A) present the paragraph as an opinion rather than as a stated fact, and B) not generalize younger readers of Ayn Rand's writing as new to her ideas,from the context this page uses the word young I get the idea it means collage aged, as I know individuals who are over 40 who have not heard of her.--69.205.162.73 02:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ageism 

message: Here are citations: ,  (I realize that this one deals with the Clinton war, but it was re-released for the Bush war, because they believe the same principles apply), . In addition, ARI president Yaron Brook condemned the Iraq War in this lecture  (and the summary says as much). I can post more sources if people are not convinced, but I hope these will suffice. LaszloWalrus 19:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARI is AGAINST the Iraq War 

message: What is a Ronbot? Endlessmike 888 19:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ronbot
Talk:Microsoft Personal Web Server

message: It should definitely be merged. The 2 articles are about the same thing, just using different names. -localzuk 10:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

message: See (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc723558.aspx) date reference Nov 1997 about PWS 1.0a on Win95. PWS on Win98 CD had a higher 1.x version.
Also "Microsoft FrontPage Personal Web Server" (support.microsoft.com/kb/161417/EN-US; support.microsoft.com/kb/161418; )
PWS 2.0 download version and available on FrontPage 97 and FP98 (support.microsoft.com/kb/258635; http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms99-010); PWS 2.0 was no longer available after Windows ME shipped. It was superior to IIS4 when IIS4 was installed (installer limited) on Win9x.
Shjacks45 (talk) 10:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of references leading to false information
Talk:Pharyngeal arch

message: Kaplan Qbank for USMLE Step-1 states that parafollicular C-cells develop from the fifth pouch. The other sources I saw (including this page) say they are from the fourth. It is probably some kind of historical confusion. Maybe they are really from the fifth, but since it fuses with the fourth we can consider that they are now from the fourth indeed. I wonder what would be the right way to reflect this on the page. Thanks! Skovorodkin 23:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that the ultimobranchial body develops from the ventral portion of the fifth pouch. This is confirmed by indiana.edu, for what it's worth .--David Iberri (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The fifth pouch 

message: My lecturers taught us that trapezius and sternocleidomastoid came from the 6th arch. The only anatomy book that I have at my disposal at the moment, Netter's Head and Neck Anatomy for Dentistry by Neil S. Norton, does not list them as such, and neither does this page. Of course I'll continue to write them as coming from the 6th arch in exams, but I'm just curious if someone can confirm or deny this. 123.2.211.122 (talk) 15:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Trapezius and sternocleidomastoid

message: === Proposed merge with Branchiomeric musculature ===
Clear duplication Tom (LT) (talk) 23:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Most of the content in the article isn't about the arch by itself but a collection of summaries of other articles (see First pharyngeal arch#Meckel's cartilage for a clear example). They can be merged readily without loss of content. --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 06:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Mergers

message: Clear duplication Tom (LT) (talk) 23:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Branchiomeric musculature]] 

message: Unneccessary fragmentation. Would be better presented with parent article. Can be reexpanded later if needed. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Second pharyngeal arch]] 

message: See above reasoning. Having all this information in one article will help readers and enhance the readability, comprehensiveness and quality of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Most of the content in the article isn't about the arch by itself but a collection of summaries of other articles (see First pharyngeal arch#Meckel's cartilage for a clear example). They can be merged readily without loss of content. --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 06:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[First pharyngeal arch]]
Talk:Cycle graph

message: Was brought from talk: cyclic graph. This page's talk page (this page) used to redirect to talk: cycle graph (old). Gah, what a mess! Hopefully this is all sorted out now:Debivort 03:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A circle graph is a circle with n equidistant points.  (In graph theory, the proper term would be "vertex.")  It represents the remainder of x divided by n (called the modulus of integer division).   It is useful in number theory for finding interesting properties of series.  It is also useful for teaching children about repeating end digits in multiplication:  a circle graph with 10 vertices, with the multiples of three graphed in sequence, results in [0,3,6,9,2,5,8,1,4,7,0], with the sequence infinitely repeating.
MathMartin 14:10, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on origin of this page 

message: This page is very confused between simple and non-simple cycles.  The useful material should be moved to path (graph theory) and then this page should become a redirect to there.  I vote for dropping "circle graph" as it is hardly ever used.  --Zero 10:12, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: this page

message: we should probably explain mathy stuff in layman's terms (in a separate section called "layman's terms" or "simple terms" or something,
This would make Wikipedia exponentially more useful to common student users.
??Is this an order accurate description??
If outputs oscillate between state variable values, and the representative sinusoidal curves have a finite number of possible amplitudes, this is a cycle graph.  These amplitude possibilities are "cycled" through directionally.
??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgreeter (talk • contribs) 11:32, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to be writing about some entirely different subject than what this article is about. Here we are talking about graphs that are collections of vertices and edges, not graphs that are drawings of functions. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Layman's Terms

message: I moved it to "cyclic graph", since that term covers only simple cycle graphs, which is what is being talked about here. Gene Ward Smith 21:54, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cyclic graph
Talk:Georgina Rizk

message: redunda
Many more hits on Google for Georgina Rizk, are you sure the name isn't a typo or an arabic transliteration for another language than English? JidGom 10:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: she was married to egyptian singer muharram fouad for a time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1:A580:B81:75BB:AF4E:218:B815 (talk) 00:35, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: husband
Talk:Johnny Byrne (writer)

message: Did Johnny Byrne edit Guardian of Piri?  I thought that particular episode was written by David Weir and edited by Christopher Penfold?
--Balor1999 10:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As no-one has provided evidence that he did, I'll strike it. —Whouk (talk) 09:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone draw more explicitly the connection between Warriors of the Deep and Guardian of Piri? I just don't get it. Is there a citation for this, or is it just someone's idea? MicroProf (talk) 22:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WotD/GoP
Talk:John Elliott (businessman)

message: My comment on "abrasive personal style" might seem POV but it is a very important part of his persona and the way people react to him.
And it's not necessary a criticism - his supporters love it!--Jack Upland 10:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Jack related to Pompey, captain of Carlton early in the 20th century?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.114.234 (talk) 12:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pompey Elliott
Template talk:Browsebar noblank

message: This template was previously nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 April 11#Template:Browsebar. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Just to clarify, my edit summary was intended to mean "health" not "help.--cj | talk 07:48, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: Please add to discussion on the usefulness of the browsebar/catbar headers, at Template talk:Browsebar#Is this bar useful?. thanks. --Quiddity 21:10, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Browsebar
Category talk:Fictional police officers

message: Hello, it is not clear to me who is a "Police Officer" and who is a "Detective". For example, I expected Robert Goren (Law & Order) to be a Detective while he is listed here as a Police officer. I'm trying to add the Homicide characters in the good categories. Can someone make this clearer to me ? Thanks. Lvr 10:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police Officers or Detective ? 

message: This should be a subcategory of :Category:Fictional law enforcement personnel. --72.67.93.68 (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: New category
Talk:Violinist of Hameln

message: I frankly have no time working multiple jobs and going to school full time or I'd do it myself, but I thought I'd mention there's a sequel series to Hameln out now, titled "ハーメルンのバイオリン弾き ~シェルクンチク~". I have a copy of the first volume sitting right here on my desk, so given a bit of time, I could add information on it. However, it'd take me a while to do given my time situation. I just checked the article to see if the information was there yet or not.
I got mine from amazon.jp.  ZaininOmega (talk) 03:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequel Series

message: *ANN
*EX
*Sequential Tart
*T.H.E.M. Anime Reviews: series
*T.H.E.M. Anime Reviews: film
--Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Me and My Girl

message: Removed "has the distinction of being the only popular song to be the subject of a headline in The Times": see for example http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/telecoms/article515377.ece  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mswake (talk • contribs) 11:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This major musical has no plot summary.  Can anyone add even a simple one?  Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks.  I upgraded the article to "start" class.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No synopsis!

message: The section added on September 27, 2009 titled "Characters" is a direct copy from : []. There is a clear statement on that site under "Intellectual Property": "You may not copy, reproduce, republish, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer, download, post, broadcast, transmit, make available to the public, or otherwise use bbc.co.uk content in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any bbc.co.uk content except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of bbc.co.uk content requires the prior written permission of the BBC.". The section material apears to be a clear copy violation. (I'll notify the editor who added the section and will return to this, but do not know when.)JeanColumbia (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy violation
Talk:Studentship

message: This article reads very like a dictionary definition - should it be moved/deleted. It is not really an encyclopedia article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.195.163 (talk • contribs) 11:23, 22 December 2005
:The article remains as it was after almost 2 decades. I have redirected it to Scholarship. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:43, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Dictionary Definition?
Category talk:Communists

message: I started a logical move:
:I am classifying communists according to nationality - otherwise, this list would be immense (giving that not all who qualify are included here).
:Am gonna slowly erase the category "Communists" from individual articles, and replace it according to nationality.
:Will leave as categories in "Communists" only the three subcategories in existence (ie: "by nationality", "Old Bolsheviks", "Marxist theorists" and "Communist rulers"; several persons will fit several categories, such as those with more than one nationality, or those who were also leaders etc. - that shouldn't be a problem, as far as I can see)
:Will also leave in the category "Communists" those who are the only ones for their respective countries (I think Jamaica qualifies)
Proposal: I am thinking of creating an "Arab category" in "by nationality", one that would include the "Iraqi category" and some others (now, I'm not even sure if there are that many others...).Dahn 11:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Wait for the Wagon

message: I know the Buckley Serenaders were mainly blackface minstrels, but do we know that they did this particular song in blackface? -- Jmabel | Talk 11:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find anything that explicity said so, but it seems likely that they did. Even non-dialect minstrel songs were usually done in blackface by minstrel troupes, according to my reading. The fact that this song was part of the Buckleys' repertoire and then spread with other troupes doesn't leave much room for it to have been a strictly whiteface number, in my opinion. -- BrianSmithson 15:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're most likely right. Conversely, some blackface performers would do segment of their show out of blackface, and this song seems like it would have been a candidate for that sort of thing. I'd love to find some good citations on this sort of thing; so often, all you get is one tossed-off remark. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Caladesi Island State Park

message: I love photos!
Mikereichold 20:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: alright, I guess I'll have to read up on how to post photos. Jafafa Hots 05:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  photos 

message: Content related to its once being Hog Island was removed as unsourced.  Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hog Island
Talk:Central Scotland (Scottish Parliament electoral region)

message: Additional member results need context in terms of constituency results, which help to determine how additional member seats are allocated. Laurel Bush 11:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election results 
Talk:Monopoly pub crawl

message: There is a Northumberland Avenue in central London.  --Urbane legend 11:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Northumberland Avenue

message: "(Piccadilly is an area not a street)"
Ummm.. Yes it is a street!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piccadilly -- I'm going to remove that note, but someone will need to change the Pub for Piccadilly to one that is actually ON Piccadilly.
Xoe26 18:11, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Piccadilly

message: Could the Electric Company, Water Works and Jail be represented by pubs as near as possible to a relevent utlity company's office or prison? I don't know London to make any specific suggestions though. Alternatively, jail is where you end up AFTER doing the pub crawl :D 128.232.250.254 17:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Electric, Water and Jail

message: I think it's too POV/OR to just have a suggested list of one pub for each property. Better to have a list of all the pubs at each property and let folks contribute/take their pick... SamSim 17:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Listings
Talk:Isicathamiya

message: I'm just curious about some of the sounds particular to iscathamiya. My only exposure is really Ladysmith Black Mambazo, so I don't know how much the actual sounds tend to vary from group to group. But in all of the recordings I've heard there's a sound someone makes that sounds like (sorry for the spelling) "Sheeye Che..E...Che!" or variations on that. I was wondering what that was. Sometimes it comes before a change in the harmony, but sometimes not. Is it some sort of direction, does it have a rough translation?24.214.198.98 16:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Sheeye Che..E...Che sound is used to signify the traditional dancing that goes with the song. It isn't a phrase, but an "exclamation", if one could call it that. As it signifies the start of a dance, it is used more (to some degree) on stage, often before the group starts dancing. I think the same applies with the grrr..grrr stuff on the songs as well.--LBM | TALK TO ME 13:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Question
Talk:Vane–vain–vein mergers

message: This needs some work: much of it is clearly copied (without acknowledgement) from http://www.norfolkdialect.com/trudgill.html (cited on the toe-tow merger page).
I would suggest merging it with toe-tow merger under Wells's name "Long mid mergers": they have a lot in common both historically and in terms of the present-day distribution of the distinctions (though the T/T distinction seems to be considerably healthier in Norfolk than the P/P one), and this would get rid of a couple of neologisms in favour of established names.
--JHJ 12:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Pane/pain section

message: Can someone point me to a clear source that states that the distinction described ever existed?  Most of this section seems to be given over to a joke about Australian English, which didn't even exist when this distinction was supposedly made. --JHJ 12:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rein/rain section
Talk:Solomon Linda

message: Solomon Linda had a rather sad history:  He never got royalties for this song, and his family's fight to get royalties for "The Lion Sleeps Tonight" was unsuccesful.  He died poor.  I don't have sources for this, but I saw a documentary on the topic, so someone must know the real answers.  --Slashme 12:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As one of the (un)official deletomatics, I can help a bit expanding this sucker. I heard about this chap on my local NPR station, and I've added a link to the The World segment about Mr Linda. D.valued 12:59, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Unlike the United States, many (if not most) places still have a 50-year copyright term, so the original song is now out of copyright, and the subsequent adaptations only retain copyright on their original elements. So if you're not in the US, feel free to give a live public performance any time. (This isn't about authors' rights, it's about enrichment of the public domain, which is the basis upon which copyright impedes the natural right of all humans to share & communicate.) 02:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expiry of copyright 
Talk:Joshua Schachter

message: Joshua got pwn'd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Selath (talk • contribs) 03:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * The Business Week article says that Schachter introduced tagging about two years ago. Yet tagging (as a UI concept, as an actual implementation, and as a more loosely defined framework of plural categorization) has existed for many years prior to that, in both web and client application contexts - one huge, online example that's been around since at least 2001 is Getty Images (Photodisc). Maybe one could say that he "popularized" the use of tags within social media applications, but it's difficult even to quantify del.icio.us' relative popularity or influence. Montecristosandwich 12:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schachter invented tags? 

message: He is running his own startup, 
http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/26/the-jig-is-up-delicious-founders-tasty-labs-debuts-qa-meets-problem-solving-platform/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rossmay (talk • contribs) 03:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current gig is Jig 