Talk:T-Mobile US

message: I've noticed on the T-Mobile website that the company refers to itself as "T-Mobile USA, Inc.". Is T-Mobile USA a subsidiary of T-Mobile US or is the real company name "T-Mobile USA, Inc."? Jesant13 (talk) 04:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the consistent use of "T-Mobile USA" on T-Mobile's US website, I've moved the article to T-Mobile USA. - BilCat (talk) 21:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-Mobile US or T-Mobile USA 

message: I'm planning in the next week or so to take a picture of the headquarters in Bellevue to use instead of the store in San Jose. -- 12.116.162.162 19:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cleaned up the whole article, but that meant some major changes. I wanted it to be as transparent as possible, so I did it section by section.
The changes were based on a fork I made a few days ago. I tried to make sure I wasn't loosing anything by checking what changed recently, but I may have accidentally lost somethings. If so, I apologies and ask that you let me know and reinsert the removed thoughts. Hope this is helpful! - Davandron | Talk 16:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major changes completed 

message: The financial statement has the following info that might benefit the article:
* of 26.877 million customers, 4.253 million are prepaid (~16%)
* for 2006, the number of customers grew by 13%
* They have revenues of ~$53 per month per customer
* It costs them ~$300 to acquire a new customer, primarily in "subsidy loss" (aka paying for the device and accessories)
* contract customers used an average of 1,150 mins/month in 07Q2, and that number is up 10% over the same period last year.
What does the group think? - Davandron | Talk 13:50, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's notable, and encyclopedic. BURNyA 15:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting data to include? 

message: I removed the following
:== myFaves ==
:myFaves is a T-Mobile money saving rate plan that allows each customer unlimited calls to any five US phone numbers, including landlines.  On its myFaves phones appears 5 icons which allow easy one touch calling, texting and photo sharing.
Because it seemed an unbalanced addition to the article. Is it notable? If so, does it belong in a section detailing plans? - Davandron | Talk 17:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MyFaves section removed, Propose plans section 

message: :Image:Voicestream logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Voicestream logo.jpg

message: According to T-Mobile PR STATEMENT REGARDING T-MOBILE HOTSPOT AND STARBUCKS: T-Mobile devices & customers will retain access to Starbucks hotspots for "years to come", indeed the Starbucks hotspot network will remain substantially T-Mobile based throughout 2008 and access will be grandfathered after that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.16.234 (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starbucks 

message: Should it be mentioned that their implimentation of 3G service is non standard? They used 2100 and 1700 whereas most unlocked Nokia Handsets as well as Motorola handsets use WCDMA 2100 for 3g. AT&T implimtented it in the standard way, the same way they are doing it in Europe. This means that one has to use a T-Mobile handset to access the 3G, something that many might be unwilling to do, considering most people choose GSM for handset freedom —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.46.138 (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Standard 3G 

message: Undid deletion since there was no basis for it. Added Sidekick link. Jhansonxi (talk • contribs) 02:46, 3 June 2009
Undid deletion again and added pre-paid customer SSN requirement complaint and ref. Jhansonxi (talk) 17:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Security Issues 

message: This article needs major work as it cites past events as upcoming (see "Network" as an example, or the paragraph on customer service directly above it). It also needs rewriting numerous portions (for instance the section on GPRS and EDGE... which should be updated to reflect T-Mobile's move to 3G, and their very recent upgrade to the HSPA 7.2 3G speeds).
If I have the chance, (and if no one beats me to it) I will start on it...
RobertMfromLI | User Talk STP2: Producer/Gaffer/Webmaster 22:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Beyond that, there's a horrible amount of material that either came directly from marketing or was lifted from promotional material (e.g. There's no reason to write 'there are NO contracts' with respect to the Even More Plus plans). A bit else has the same feel. Cnj (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

text: "Major work needed" is an understatement. The entire Article is one big ad filled with meaningless marketing jargon. It really needs to be deleted and rewritten from scratch. Rahul (talk) 23:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Tell me what needs changing? Viper Matrix Wireless (talk) 03:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I will give you two quick examples. In the introduction, it says "T-Mobile USA tends to compete on value...". Where is the citation for this "value" claim? The citation for the entire sentence, a review entitled 'Apples-to-Apples Comparison of the "Big Four" U.S. Wireless Providers' Calling Plans' in the website www.thewirelessreport.com, nowhere claims, let alone justifies, that T-Mobile competes on value. And even if it did, it's from Feb 2006, almost five years ago, and we know that cellphone plans change greatly every few months. Furthermore, that review itself is seriously defective, as it (a) ignores taxes/fees/surcharges, which are not identical across all carriers, (b) ignores prepaid plans entirely, and (c) is only relevant to a specific type and degree of cellphone use. Please bear in mind that this is just one example, so fixing this would not fix the Article. Second example: "Historically, they have also pioneered new features." This sounds like original research to me. No citations given. Everybody pioneers their own new features; what makes T-Mobile more of a pioneer than the competition? Rahul (talk) 19:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Seems to me that the wrong citation was provided. I do know back in 2006 that it was said "T-Mobile USA tends to compete on value". However, times have changed and I don't hear that any longer. They have pioneered major features in the past. However, who ever wrote that did not mention what features they invented. So I am seeing it as blunt. I believe that any carrier invents a feature that is greatly noticeable that it should be talked about but with citations and more details to it explaining what the feature does and such. I wouldn't say T-Mobile is more of a pioneer but it should be there because they are the ones who invented it. Also, I have noticed that are things missing from T-Mobile USA's page but it really needs to be re-written in which will include new things that we're not on the previous wiki page. I have written a few things on the page myself and when I started to write things the page got flagged as an advertisement. As of now i'm trying to figure out how to take what I have written and turn into something encyclopedic. Viper Matrix Wireless (talk) 03:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major work needed on article 

message: T-Mobile is now claiming on their latest TV ad that they have the largest 4G network in the nation...Dreammaker182 (talk) 20:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: fake 4G (DC-HSPA+ 42mb) still shares 3G network, LTE (4G) is a new radio network that does not share 3G (up to DC-HSPA+), At&t do it as well, this also brings up the main article stating 4G on 3G technologies in article when it should be called 3G (calling 3G 4G does not make 3G faster its just pure marketing rubush) and should not be in the article apart from a Note about fake 4G rename and why Leexgx (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest 4G Network in the US? 

message: Article states On April 9, 2010, the report was released in German at a press conference at the German headquarters of Deutsche Telekom in Bonn, and stirred up considerable media feedback. This leads to the impression that the press conference was actually at the HQ of DT which it was not. It was only in the city of Bonn, which is home to the HQ of DT. -- 178.202.229.63 (talk) 13:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading statement in article 

message: Can we remind everyone to stop being emotional about a cell phone company? –TashTish (talk) 14:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacock words 

message: The information in the Labor relations section appears to be accurate, reasonably well cited, historic and encyclopedic. However, it is also one-sided and is not in keeping with the guidelines described in WP:UNDUE. This section describes labor's view of the situation exclusively. The section is in need of significant revision to add the viewpoints of the company and the employees who do/did not want union representation. Additionally, it would be appropriate to reduce the size of the section as it is unnecessarily long and detailed.
TL/DR the Labor relations section needs to be shorter and "fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint" per WP:UNDUE. Ch Th Jo (talk) 01:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labor Relations section needs significant revision - WP:UNDUE 

message: In the "4G/LTE upgrade" section, a change was made between 00:13, 7 March 2012 and 12:33, 24 March 2012. This change included the following: "in order to achieve compatibility with othecivet works and phones in the USA".
Clearly, "othecivet" is not a word, but I've no idea what the person making the change intended to say. I'm not well-versed in Wikipedia editing, and am uncertain how to mark this to bring it to somebody's attention. (Just spent 20 minutes trying to ascertain if there's a "fix me" tag of some kind, to no avail.) Apologies for not fixing this myself, but I'm not entirely sure how best to do so. I don't want to just roll back the user's change, as other worthwhile changes were made.
So, I mark it here, in hopes somebody will see this, and have some idea what the sentence should read. Thanks! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.52.13.66 (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obvious typo in article, but I'm uncertain how to fix 

message: There's seems to be a dispute as to whether VoiceStream Wireless should be a redirect to this page or it's own article. I oppose a separate article. Firstly, because it is still the same company. It was acquired by Deutsche Telekom and its name chanhed to match the international branding, but its still the same continuous operation and, as far as I can see from regulatory filings, the same corporate charter. Even the infobox here uses the 1994 founding date As the other proposed article is a short article at best, with only four paragraphs once the meta-content like the infobox and the parts redundant to this article are removed), it's an unneeded fork. It's completely analogous to Cingular Wireless being a redirect to AT&T Mobility, which was done based on the same reasoning. oknazevad (talk) 18:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no "dispute" because you are refusing to engage in the process. Despite my requests for discussion, there is nothing on the VoiceStream Wireless article talk page - you didn't make any effort at all. The VoiceStream article did not suddenly appear and is not new. You are in fact trying to change the status quo and are therefore required to state your reasons. You did not seek any discussion or input. You have repeatedly imposed your individual will without discussion. You have ignored requests to discuss the change. VoiceStream existed as a separate entity for years before the merger and has its own unique history. Just because two companies merge, that does not establish a "rule" that articles should be combined. I've read WP:FORK and it supports creation of a second article - I don't think you've actually read WP:FORK or you wouldn't have cited it - WP:FORK hurts your case. There are other wireless provider articles and many company articles that have handled mergers differently - ATT/Cingular is only one example and does not dictate how things are handled elsewhere. (It's my opinion that combining those articles was a poor choice.) Additionally, that decision was made by just a few people and hardly represent consensus decision making at its best and shouldn't be held up as authoritative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.66.248 (talk) 18:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  VoiceStream redirect 

message: Looks like most of the content there is already in this article, and this article has more up-to-date content, because nobody bothered to update T-Mobile USA 3G until I came along today, only to realize the very issue I'm flagging here. -- Dandv(talk|contribs) 08:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it; it's an unneeded fork. oknazevad (talk) 11:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in [[T-Mobile USA 3G]]? 

message: I see someone put the follwing into the Article ". As of 2011, J.D. Power and Associates, a global marketing-information-services firm, ranked the company highest among major wireless carriers for retail-store satisfaction four years consecutively and highest for wireless customer care two years consecutively." It seems that is no longer true see here, here, here, here, here and there is nothing on the T-Mobile website that even mentions any awards from J.D Power and Associates  UnknownElement (Talk) 01:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  J.D. Power and Associates Rankings 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on T-Mobile US. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140218111505/http://prepaid-phones.t-mobile.com:80/prepaid-additional-services to http://prepaid-phones.t-mobile.com/prepaid-additional-services
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on T-Mobile US. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131211180641/http://www.metropcs.com:80/metro/PhonesandMore? to http://www.metropcs.com/metro/PhonesandMore
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120112152504/http://www.metropcs.com/ to http://www.metropcs.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on T-Mobile US. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140422170127/http://investor.t-mobile.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=177745&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1887921&highlight= to http://investor.t-mobile.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=177745&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1887921&highlight=
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141031023143/http://newsroom.t-mobile.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=251624&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1903058&highlight=&AID=11031750&PID=6147683 to http://newsroom.t-mobile.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=251624&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1903058&highlight=&AID=11031750&PID=6147683
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131102033550/http://www.marketwatch.com/story/t-mobile-to-hold-magenta-saturday-sale-with-smartphones-and-tablets-for-as-little-as-0-4999-net-down-2011-11-15 to http://www.marketwatch.com/story/t-mobile-to-hold-magenta-saturday-sale-with-smartphones-and-tablets-for-as-little-as-0-4999-net-down-2011-11-15
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on T-Mobile US. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19990504&slug=2958742
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.t-mobile.com/Company/CompanyInfo.aspx?tp=Abt_Tab_CompanyOverview&tsp=Abt_Sub_History
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2001/fcc01142.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.t-mobile.com/Company/CompanyInfo.aspx?tp=Abt_Tab_CompanyOverview
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=19358&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=31703&mapcode=corporate%7cfinancial
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://support.t-mobile.com/knowbase/root/public/tm22696.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130312063201/https://selfcare.hotspot.t-mobile.com/locations/viewLocationMap.do to https://selfcare.hotspot.t-mobile.com/locations/viewLocationMap.do
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://businesscenter.jdpower.com/news/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2011016
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://businesscenter.jdpower.com/news/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2011010
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://buywapsite.com/index.php/2021/02/13/best-mobile-2021/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachchidanand chaudhary 1 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think this section needs to be update as the application has been accepted and the pleading cycle has stated, as several documents have been filed in releation to the merger. 75.107.198.37 (talk) 04:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempted mergers with Sprint

message: there are some inaccuracies in the messaging for mobile without borders under roaming, and new phone plans offered by t-mobile including military, 55+, etc. i've been trying to edit to correct these but my changes keep getting reversed. Please help asap or please stop changing my edits!
Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hgjo10 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Inaccuracies: Roaming and Phone Plans 

message: •Information to be added or removed: 
Under "roaming": "On July 15, 2015, T-Mobile launched Mobile Without Borders, a service included with all new T-Mobile plans and available as an add-on to grandfathered or promotional plans. With Mobile Without Borders, customers can stay connected when traveling in Canada and Mexico with unlimited talk, text and data and up to 5GB of 4G LTE (or a maximum of high-speed data allotment, whichever comes first). Mobile Without Borders is included on T-Mobile ONE, Simple Choice North America, or with a qualifying feature on certain prepaid plans. After 5GB of high-speed data is used in Mexico and Canada (or high-speed data allotment is reached, whichever comes first), customers stay connected with unlimited data at Simple Global speeds (up to 128kbps for most plans or 256kbps with T-Mobile ONE Plus)." <INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE UPDATED>
In the "products and services" section, add these paragraphs: 
T-Mobile Essentials
In August 2018, T-Mobile introduced T-Mobile Essentials, a tailor-made phone plan for customers who just want the basics. Unlimited talk, text and data at a lower price than T-Mobile ONE for $30/line for 4 lines with AutoPay, plus taxes and fees. <INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE ADDED>
T-Mobile ONE for Military
In April 2018, T-Mobile introduced T-Mobile ONE for Military – the biggest military discount in wireless. T-Mobile ONE for Military is 20% off the first line and Half Off up to five additional voice lines. The first line is $55 with AutoPay – normally $70. And it’s Half Off after that, up to six lines – just $25 line and $10 per line for the third through sixth lines with AutoPay. With this plan, on average a family of four can save $665 per year. It also includes everything included in the T-Mobile ONE plan at no extra cost. <INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE ADDED>
Unlimited 55+
In August 2017, T-Mobile introduced the Unlimited 55+ plan. With this, customers ages 55 years and older can get two lines of T-Mobile ONE for $60 with AutoPay – all with unlimited talk, text, and LTE data. <INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE ADDED>
T-Mobile ONE
In August 2016, T-Mobile introduced T-Mobile ONE. It combines unlimited voice minutes, text messaging, and high-speed data. This plan also includes regulatory taxes and fees included in the price; Netflix Standard 2-screen plan at no extra charge (with 2+ qualifying lines); stream unlimited video at DVD-quality; stream unlimited music; texting and data abroad in 140+ countries and destinations; in-flight texting and one hour of Wi-Fi on Gogo-enabled flights; unlimited in Mexico and Canada; and, mobile hotspot data at 3G speeds. T-Mobile ONE is $70 for one line; $60/line for two lines with Netflix included; $47/line for three lines with Netflix included; and $35/line for four lines with Netflix included. <INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE UPDATED>
•Explanation of issue: the first change updates factual inaccuracies about what Mobile Without Borders is and adds in what the plan includes. T-Mobile has also added three new rate plans to its product line, and these needed to be added for transparency of all T-Mobile offers. Additionally, T-Mobile ONE plan had inaccuracies about the program that includes Netflix, so updated/accurate language has been added there. These changes make this page accurate and encompasses the full information about the company's products/services
•References supporting change: 
https://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/roaming 
https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans
https://www.t-mobile.com/offers/binge-on-streaming-video
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballard10 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Some proposed changes

message: # Information on plan details, including pricing and discount options, are generally not allowed in articles, per WP:NOTACATALOG.
# Please remember to sign all posts made on the talk page.
Regards,  Spintendo  19:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 18-DEC-2018

message: if pricing and discount options are not allowed, how are there already pricing details in the wikipedia page before i requested edits? trying to update new plans that t-mobile has released that is not updated on the page. additionally, updating information/context about mobile without borders, which is currently inaccurate
--Ballard10 (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 19-DEC-2018

message: Hi all,
I wanted to see how others feel about moving the history of the Sprint merger to its own article? The failed ATT merger has its own article and it has far less history.
Appreciate your thoughts. ~ Dogojosho (talk) 07:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea to me. You might work it up in draftspace to show what it would look like, and give others a chance to work on it too. - BilCat (talk) 21:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Merger History to Own Article? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The Essentials section quotes "prioritize" during network congestion, however my reading of the fine print for Essentials plans shows that the proper word would be "deprioritize." As of this writing, the page states:
During congestion, customers using >50GB/mo. and Essentials customers may notice lower speeds than other customers due to data prioritization.
As my edit has been reverted for "vandalism" by a bot (BilCat), along with an accompanying threat of removal of editing privileges, I am unable to make the necessary correction. Ccfreak2k (talk) 00:08, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: BilCat is not a bot. He's an administrator. That's said, I think the warning was an overreaction, and an error. In his defense, you didn't use an edit summary to explain why you were making the change, which made it look like it was just someone swapping the meaning of a sentence, a common form of vandalism. I'd advise you to make sure to use edit summaries so others can understand your intent. As for the edit itself, I rephrased the sentence to make it clear that the Essentials plan customers are the ones who are not a priority (that's the trade off in the plan: lower price, but you have to deal with less priority for your use during peak periods.) oknazevad (talk) 13:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essentials Correction 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: They keep having data breaches.  What's wrong with this company? 20 Jan 2023, the news is reporting yet another data breach again? When I left at the time of the Sprint merger they were at about 3rd or 4th. They had one after that.  Now this? CaribDigita (talk) 16:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-Mobile just had like the 5th or 6th data breach since around 2008-2009ish 

message: Was Ultra successfully acquired by T-Mobile US or is it still ongoing? If it has been completed is it going to be a subsidiary or division? WiinterU (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultra Mobile 

message: Some mention of the T-Mobile "Digits" service would be welcome. Ericfluger (talk) 16:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digits?