lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Muthu Thandavar

message: PerhapsUser:Bharatveer should read Wikipedia is not a battleground before indulging in serial reverts on this article. I have repetedly stated that the references provided in the article, some of them available online to read provide supporting information for all the statements in the article. I would recommend the user to stop this repeated reverts and try and add something useful to the article. Thanks Parthi talk/contribs 10:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bharatveer's reverts 

message: User:Venu is repeatedly removing the citation needed tags from this article.This looks quite different from his "reputation" elsewhere in Wikipedia where he "demands" source for each and every line .It is no hard task to find the real reason .It is just that weblink he cites Chembur} , is a collection of speculations regarding muthuthandavar.-Bharatveer 11:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is a stub. Inline citations for stubs are not common. The referred article by Prof.Subramaniam does mention the details found in the article, whether they are 'speculations' or not is your merely your opinion. There is no harm in reading a few articles. - Parthi talk/contribs 18:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's no rule like "once a stub, always a stub". All articles are born from stubs, there's no sense in being "stubborn" ­ ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 19:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No personal attacks please. Thanks Parthi talk/contribs 19:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has a problem with English, it has to be either me or you. I said there's no sense in being stubborn. I didnt suggest that it is pointed at you. I dont think theres a rule that citations/references are bad or forbidden or unusual for stubs­ either ­ ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 19:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: User:Venu62's reverts of citation needed tags
Talk:P. K. Gopi

message: In the bibliography, are the titles supposed to be individual poems or book-length collections? This is relevant for formatting; if they're poems, they belong in quotation marks and if they're books, they should be italicized.
In the list of awards, how many of these warrant inclusion? Some of this is pretty specialized. The American Malayalee Doctors Award, for instance: is this prestigious? Who gives it out? It's hard to gauge the value of the awards when none of them are wikilinked and they're presented with zero context. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 00:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions on bibliography and list of awards
Talk:Red Flag (Jericho)

message: I've removed the text re: Gracie dying as it is speculation at this point. The indications from promos, etc. all seem to make it clear that the character will die, but as far as we know based on what has aired in the body of the show, not including previews, she has been stabbed. Is she dead? Will she be discovered, attempts made to treat her, but she still dies? Unless I'm mistaken, we don't know yet. --Ckatzchatspy 23:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put text on Gracie's murder back in. The episode description for Vox Populi confirms she is dead, because Gray leads the townspeople in a hunt for Gracie's "murderer." In addition, leaks from CBS stated that a main character would be killed. --Tarheel blue 23:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your change ("mortally wounded") actually addresses both my concerns and what happens in the next episode. The older version said that she was "killed", which implies that she is dead at the end of the episode. "Mortally wounded", on the other hand, leaves open the possibility that she survives for a while, but inevitably succumbs to the injuries sustained in the attack. Thanks! --Ckatzchatspy 01:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. It's pretty obvious that her wounds are quite probably mortal if she doesn't get medical assistance soon. The new wording leaves the question of whether she actually dies before or after next week's opening credits roll an open one, which could come in handy if the CBS press blurb turns to be wrong and/or deliberately misleading. Sixty Six 05:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gracie's fate
Category talk:Liberal Unionist Party politicians

message: I suggest that  should be meged into this one.  Anyone got any objections? --BrownHairedGirl (talk)  • (contribs) 21:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. john k 22:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy with that. Martín (saying/doing) 09:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, all articles recategorised. --BrownHairedGirl (talk)  • (contribs) 14:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from
Talk:Proj construction

message: Great Work!T3kcit 21:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad you like it. Ryan Reich 22:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

message: minor problem here. Take k to be a field, and S=k[x] where x has degree 2. Then 
Proj(S)=Spec(k)  is a single point, and yet the twisting sheaf as defined here
is O(1). Let's see...the global sections of this are the degree one elements of k[x,x^{-1}]
but all elements have even degree. But there is no nonzero coherent sheaf on Spec(k)
without nonzero global sections....so somewhere you need to start assuming S is generated
by elements of degree 1 in this section.89.242.8.39 23:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we do assume that in the Global Proj section, so it seems reasonable.  However, I am not an expert on these nuances and I do actually make the note that it is erroneous that the ring can be reconstructed from the various powers of the twisting sheaf.  I don't have my copy of Hartshorne with me and I don't remember this being in there, but then again, he might simply have stated at the beginning of the chapter that all his rings are generated in degree 1.  This is exactly the sort of issue that could turn out to be "not a bug, but a feature" of the general theory, and I'm certainly not going to go around creating suspect mathematics by imposing a condition like this, even if it seems reasonable.  I'll check later, and so should you. Ryan Reich 14:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I had a look myself and it does seem that he specifically mentions "generated in degree 1" in one of his big theorems.  I don't really mention specific results by name here; I just wrote a sort of motivational spiel about what O(1) means, and that spiel does actually have the disclaimer that things don't always work out nicely.  My one actual example is a polynomial ring, which is generated in degree 1.  I guess: if you're sufficiently bothered by the distinction you should add some material that uses this assumption crucially and point it out.  As for EGA, chapter 2 is most definitely a clone of (the table of contents of) EGA1, which is, I think, what was intended.  At the time (1977) EGA was the only real reference for schemes (Mumford's Red Book was popular but not even officially published and also, not very complete), and it was in French and written like Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, which is to say, with nearly unintelligible rigor.  Hartshorne transformed it into a useful text for people trying to understand the (by then not-so-) new ideas, albeit incompletely.  As for chapter 3...I'm just glad I don't have to read EGA3 to learn how one defines sheaf cohomology.  BTW, why don't you open a Wikipedia account?  It's easy and you get a name.  Ryan Reich 13:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The twisting sheaf of Serre

message: Short comment/suggestion: The section starts with "for any x \in X...". Shouldn't it rather be "for any closed point x \in X?
FredrikMeyer (talk) 12:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement does hold for any point. UL (talk) 13:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the section "Proj of a quasi-coherent sheaf"
Talk:Parikrama (band)

message: This is an important article as Parikrama is a notable India Rock band. They regularly perform at IIT-B [] Fest Mood Indigo [] and have a decent fan following. Even the tag "resembles a fan site" is very harsh.
59.163.2.161 08:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  notable, they are. not just because they have played at mood-i, but have probably played more than any other band in india... but a fansite? yes... "Parkrima was honored to start the show for the great metal band Iron Maiden's live show in Bangalore,which was held on 17 march 2007." seems way fan-pov. the article definitely needs a clean-up. joseph 12:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''A Notable Band''' 
Talk:Provoked (film)

message: Towards the end of the "reception" section is the following sentence: "In the film Kiranjit Ahluwalia is portrayed as a middle class homemaker instead of a factory worker as she was in reality, Pragna Patel and Rahila Gupta's characters are merged to create one person, played by the Indian actress Nandita Das, and Americanized legal terminology rather than the actual British."
This could probably be more coherent by breaking it up into several sentences, particularly the part about American legal terminology which is a completely different subject and isn't explained or elaborated.  Promontoriumispromontorium (talk) 10:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing run-on sentence

message: The IMDb page gives the title Provoked: A True Story; is that a change, or an error somewhere? (It is probably notable enuf to displace the slasher film Provoked (1989) from this title.) --Jerzy•t 16:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Has no critic ever asked these questions:
Why isn't this woman in jail for life???
Why does this movie depict the brutal, pre-planned murder of a human being as something admirable?
Because I can't find it in the article anywhere. So much for balance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.128.94.185 (talk) 02:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder condoned? 
Talk:Ragam Thanam Pallavi

message: I propose merging Pallavi into Ragam Thanam Pallavi. The primary content there seems to belong here, and the rest seems better suited to hatnotes or disambiguation pages.  — Moriwen (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, given that the concept of the refrain is used with similar importance in both Ragam Thanam Pallavi and Kriti (music). My view is that the current structure works appropriately, and merging to Ragam Thanam Pallavi wouldn't increase clarity for readers. Looking at the current incoming links, most of them seem to be using it in the sense of a refrain as part of other larger forms, rather than as an abbreviation for Ragam Thanam Pallavi. Klbrain (talk) 20:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, with no merge, given the uncontested objection and no support with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 21:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Rahul Sharma (musician)

message: His origin:
Pt Shivkumar Sharma , Rahul's father hails from Jammu. I wonder why does he mentions everywhere that he is from Kashmir! Does it make him feel more priviledged to come from Kashmir as compared to his roots in Jammu? Not sure!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.112.90.138 (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by [[Special:Contributions/203.112.90.138|203.112.90.138]]

message: I believe his wife should be mentioned in the article. She would be pretty inmportant. --Abeg92contribsBoomer Sooners! 19:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  His wife 
Talk:2006 Jerusalem gay pride parade

message: I think there's a confusion/mistake here. There was supposed to be a WORLD gay parade which had strong opposition to and was cancelled because of the conflict eventually. That was cancelled and over. But this event is the event that takes place every year for a few years now and it's the own Jerusalem Israeli event, unrelated to the world parade. Maybe i'm wrong but you should verify this probably. I'd also suggest to make this about Israeli gay parades, then jerusalem gay parades and probably link to the world event somehow rather than focus on this year's alone which could probably be a section within the main article. My 2 cents worth. Amoruso 21:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What I suggest is either (1) make a redirect (2) make it a huge section on a general israel/jerusalem gay parade - it will be the biggest thing in it anyway (3) retain the whole article and then a link to main if you feel it'll be long enough in itself. btw, I don't know why there's an objection to this event, I don't understand why it should bother anyone IMO.  Amoruso 00:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: page move

message: I think the title "gay parade" is misleading and does not follow the universal mission of gay pride parades. The word "pride" is notable and important in the context of pride parades, and dropping it from what was called in Hebrew מצעד הגאווה is a mistake. This article should be named 2006 Jerusalem gay pride parade. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 17:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, Lea. Done. IronDuke 21:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename  
Talk:Ramana Gogula

message: Removed references to his lack of appreciation in Tollywood. Even though it didn't name names it seemed potentially contentious. Will watch for its reappearance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.179.227.58 (talk) 20:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:North Loop, Minneapolis

message: According to the National Register Information System, the boundaries of the Warehouse District on the National Register of Historic Places are: Roughly bounded by River St., 1st Ave. N., 6th St. N., 2nd Ave. N., 5th St. N., 5th Ave. N., 3rd St. N., & 10th Ave. N.  --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 22:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jam-Master Jay

message: The "Murder And Aftermath" section offers information completely unrelated to that of Mizell or his death. The second, third and fourth paragraphs should be removed completely, and the fifth paragraph adjusted accordingly. Mcr29 21:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder and aftermath section 

message: Seriously...do people know him as Jason Mizell, or as Jam-Master Jay?  His most commonly known name should be the page title, as it is with other artists.  Eminem isn't listed as Marshall Mathers, Nas isn't listed as Nasir Jones, and Jay-Z isn't listed as Shawn Carter.  It's common sense. DestradoZero 16:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name should be changed to Jam-Master Jay 

message: there should be a section of it. This article says it all
http://music.yahoo.com/read/news/12025073  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.170.222.97 (talk) 22:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence and Legacy
Talk:Rudra veena

message: Is it a lute or a zither, or something else? Badagnani (talk) 01:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lute or zither?

message: I have been looking up some instruments, and I noticed the image for Rudra Veena and Vichitra Veena is the same, yet only this article refers to the other. Is there a connection, was it a mistake, or what happened?
--Gchick (talk) 16:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between Rudra Veena and Vichitra Veena? 

message: Should the Veena (instrument) and Rudra veena articles be merged? Checkingfax (talk) 23:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Veena (instrument)]] -vs- [[Rudra veena]] 

message: Need Hindi spelling for "bin." 173.89.236.187 (talk) 22:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindi spelling for "bin" 
Talk:S. Balachander

message: Shouldn't the article be moved to "Sundaram Balachander"? // habj 21:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added section:
==Feud with the Kanchi shankaracharya==
 
Balachander,though hmself a brahmin heavily resented the influence that the kanchi mutt held over brahmins in tamilnadu. His remarks calling the Kanchi shankaracharya Chandra shekarendra saraswati "A senile old man" and calling he kanchi mutt a "420 organization" deeply hurt the feelings of the brahmin community.
From Revision as of 04:25, 4 September 2016
This was tweaked subsequently, but "mutt" and "420" endured throughout. — MaxEnt 15:37, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long-standing vandalism
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Devilmaycares

message: :Aside from the dif about John Wayne Gacy where I don't see why having the category makes a lot of sense, I endorse this as reasonable and accurate. JoshuaZ 21:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: wow how cute I have a stalker. Devilmaycares 03:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, but why a RfC? —12.72.72.175 09:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A few reasons.  1. It's the first step in dispute resolution. My hope is that Devil will fix his/her own behavior as a result of the attention here.  2. I'd like outside eyes to verify that I'm not crazy. 3. Assuming I'm not crazy, perhaps with greater scrutiny Devil won't get away with his behavior any more. 4. I'm not really sure of a better way to get the ball rolling.  WP:ANI isn't relay for this kind of complaint.  I'm totally open to other suggestions on what to do, but I feel it has been going on long enough.  ---J.S (t|c) 18:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhm, don't get too emotionally involved in Wikipedia.  It is, ultimately, a BBS. —12.72.69.106 18:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, it's not unhealthy to care about something. :) ---J.S (t|c) 19:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks like that was done by an anon editor... do you have any evidence it's Devil? ---J.S (t|c) 18:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Devilmaycares picked-up patterns already established by this anon editor, including (but not restricted to) which edits he makes to the McVeigh article and to the article on Brian Flemming.  It's pretty easy to find articles edited both as/by that anon and as/by Devilmaycares, compare the edits, and see that it's the same guy. (I'm not objecting to the fact that he switches per se; the point is that he's incivil and POV pushing, sometimes to a point that even admins admit is vandalism.) —12.72.69.106 18:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Hi, I've moved this RfC into the candidate section, because it would appear that it has only been certified by 1 user. Addhoc 13:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved into candidate section
Talk:Lane moje

message: The article header claims this is a 'song'.  The rest of the article contains a 'Track list'.  But songs don't have track lists, so is this a song or an album? Valrith 22:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Lane Moje" is a song. The tracklist is (I think) of the single release. I'll confirm that when I get to the Serbia-Montenegro ESC entries. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The track listing is for the single release. This is standard for most commercial releases of songs as singles. Grk1011 (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Track list?
Talk:Peter Voulkos

message: IMHO compared to real stubs (2-3 starter sentences) this is not a stub but a  full article. However I suggest you might want to use "sectstub" instead of "stub" to show people what (more) needs to be written.  Goldenrowley 03:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: stub sizes

message: I was not able to find many of the obvious quotes and discussions about Mr. Voulkos' art that were cited as coming from the NYT in the edition that was attached. I am more than willing to admit that I may have missed something or a difference between Midwest or West coast versions. Thanks, bobdog54 (talk) 20:33, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Times Obituary
Talk:Sandeep Chowta

message: Hi,
Blatant Copy of http://www.bollywoodsargam.com/bollywood_news.php?newsstory=236743582--0-latest-Sandeep_Chowta___When_global_sound_calls_bollywood_news.html was added to the page. I have reverted those changes. Interested users are requested to copyedit relevant information with references.
Chirag (talk) 16:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant Copy reverted 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Sandhya Mukherjee

message: change hospitalization date from 27th February to 27th January Aneesh Deogharia (talk) 09:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2022
Talk:Sandip Burman

message: Copyrighted material lifted from Sandip's homepage.
Has anybody here had the same experience I have had that Sandip uses his music clinics as a vehicle for a social message about respecting elders/proper attitude toward authority etc etc? 66.58.219.109 06:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition
Talk:Millburn Academy

message: "From 1979 onwards the school began to focus on becoming a six year school and to this day it is held in high regard by parents and the community at large for its extremely high standard of higher education it offers."
"The school is highly regarded throughout Scotland as being one of the top academic schools as well as having a very high sporting record."
With no sources or references to back up these claims, the neutrality of the article comes into question.
Stu1024 21:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

message: A good start. More content and especially references and possibly pics needed to advance to a B. Dahliarose 15:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: I've removed from the page history a paragraph of text about the history of the school. The text can be found in its entirety on page 7 of the current (2023-2024) school prospectus. We can accept facts from sources, but we can't accept copyrighted text. The text was introduced in 2021. As it pre-dates the current prospectus I did ask myself who was copying from who. Given the peculiar formatting of the text, and the likelihood of a formal prospectus containing text copied from Wikipedia, I concluded on the balance of probabilities that this text came from an older version of the prospectus and is thus copyrighted to the school. If anyone wants to rewrite this content in their own words, or alternatively provide evidence that it has been freely licensed for use here, then they're welcome to do that. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted text removed