lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John of Lancaster, Duke of Bedford

message: I would consider the available references to possibly be accurate but not of a truly credible source as they are personal websites maintained by an individual and not an institutiion. For now I am going to label this article as unreferenced until more suitable references can support many of the facts about John Lancaster. Mkdwtalk 03:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The castle's name in the article, Joyeux Repos, turns up in few places, and, notably, is not present in either the English or the French article for the building. To my knowledge, the name means literally "Happy Rest". Would it be possible that it results from an error in translation, referring originally to the circumstances of Duke of Bedford's death? Avec yl' Ches (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Rouen Castle]]

message: Why was he created Duke of Bedford twice? I have searched the article for a reason but I am either missing it or it's not given.2600:8804:8C40:401:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 05:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What makes you think it happened twice? I can't see that in the article. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Why was he created Duke of Bedford twice?

message: I am looking for sources to remove the section level "more references" tags. I couldn't easily find a source for
* "His birthplace is unknown but some historians speculate that he was born in Kenilworth Castle, Warwickshire." That was in the Birth and family section.
* "Between 1403 and 1405, grants of the forfeited lands from the House of Percy and of the alien priory of Ogbourne, Wiltshire, considerably increased his income. " That was in the Birth and family section.
::There is now mention that he received castles that had belonged to Henry Percy in the "Warden of the East March" section.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finding sources
Talk:Harvard Law School

message: Tell the Wikitruth! Why was the article about Professor Charles Ogletree completely deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.103.11.199 (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Ogletree 

message: A few of the sections here look like ads for the different departments, which makes sense since they look like they were copied from the web pages.  Can they be more neutral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.240.60 (talk) 19:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adverts? 

message: The first sentence under "Harvard Law Review" seemed a little fuzzy to me. Could someone look at my edit and verify if it still says what was intended. If not, feel free to revert. Many thanks...Makermark (talk) 15:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harvard Law Review 

message: An unregistered editor is claiming that this school's motto is "Veritas Lex et Iustitia". Unfortunately, the source they cite doesn't seem to say that anywhere. Those words are certainly on the school's new shield but the only mention of a motto anywhere on that webpage is a quote from the school's dean where he notes that "by combining the words lex et iustitia, with our shared motto veritas, we make explicit that Harvard Law School stands for truth, law, and justice." "Our shared motto veritas," in fact, strongly implies that the school's motto is only "veritas" just like its parent university. ElKevbo (talk) 23:56, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They've also provided a second source that includes the same quote as above and again doesn't say that the law school's motto is "Veritas Lex et Iustitia". ElKevbo (talk) 00:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And a third source that also doesn't say that the school's motto has been changed. ElKevbo (talk) 12:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur with ElKevbo on this one.  Just because they're adding additional words to the new shield doesn't change the motto itself, "veritas." --Coolcaesar (talk) 15:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto
Template talk:PromotedFPC

message: Since this template is used only on Talk pages, it is likely that the members of Template standardization will try to make this template match all the other Talk page templates that use the "Coffee Roll" formatting. If you do not think that this should happen, you should join the debate at Wikipedia talk:Template standardisation on the scope of the Template standardization project. BlankVerse ∅ 04:15, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template standardization
Talk:Benedict

message: Discussion moved to: Talk:Benedict of Nursia Przepla 15:52, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who is he? 2603:7000:3F02:1F49:CCD5:4C16:934C:7C5 (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:   St Benedict
Talk:SAR

message: ----
For a March 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/SAR
----
(William M. Connolley 19:04, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Can't SAR also stand for Shareef Abdur-Rahim, the National Basketball Association player for the Sacramento Kings?
*It's also the initals of millions of people.  Is that a common shorthand that people will actually look for?  SchmuckyTheCat 15:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shareef Abdur-Rahim 

message: "Our assessment uses the species-area relationship (SAR) to project the potential loss of species based upon the loss of
natural habitats" in http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art25/
Seams to be an important ecological concept.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.17.53.4 (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: species-area relationship (SAR)

message: You should add "Search And Rescue" to the dis-ambiguation for SAR. —Roland Scroggs
:It's already listed. +mt 23:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Search And Rescue
Category talk:Superheroes

message: So... in order to find a specific superhero you must first know  which publisher published the title your superhero was in?
I think superheroes ought to have all superheroes listed in it, as well as have them listed by publisher.
~ender 2005-03-13 12:15:MST
:All articles in a subcategory are assumed to be implicitly categorized in the parent category, i.e. everyone in :Category:DC Comics superheroes is by association already in :Category:Superheroes.  -Sean Curtin 01:18, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
::Yeah, but suppose I'm a user, and I say, 'Hey, what was that cool superhero who was into squirrels...'  I go looking at categories, and see just a set of publishers (about 15 zillion of them when wikipedia is completed), now I've got to go to each publisher, and then to each super-hero group within the publisher, etc, in order to eventually find squirrel-girl.
::I guess you're saying instead I should be making a list of all superheroes, instead of working on the categories...
::~ender 2005-03-24 13:00:MST
:Some superheroes have had multiple publishers, which is part of why that organizational system sucks. Another reason it sucks is because it was probably devised based the premiss that characters from the same company are related to each  other as part of the same shared "universe", which may not be the case at all. The characters should be in alphabetical lists, with pages dedicated to different initial letters.--Drvanthorp 21:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: What about having male/female superheros categories? I don't have time to do it myself, but anyone want a project?! Missdipsy 16:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male/female superheros?
Talk:Blackwhite

message: To claim that the use of the term "freedom fighter" is obviously and inherently false is to dismiss asymmetrical warfare as inherently invalid. While in the current climate terrorism is regarded as universally immoral by those in the west it has historically been regarded by the vast majority of western thinkers to be valid in circumstances like the french resistance during world war two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.19.236 (talk) 03:57, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Terrorism is when you work for your goal by targeting third parties who are not directly involved in the issues. Freedom fighters from, for example, France during the German occupation didn't do that (they sabotaged the German military and those who supplied them). I'm removing the NPOV tag again - would have posted on your talk page if you were signed in but you weren't so I can't. TH 14:30, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "freedom fighter" vs "terrorist" 

message: I'm not sure whether blackwhite should be merged into Newspeak. If someone does want to merge it somewhere, may be a better idea would be Doublethink? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.108.192.71 (talk) 14:27, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Sound trademark

message: I merged what information from Sound logo that I could, and made it a redirect to here. <S>How do you get rid of that merge notice at the top of this article?</S> DaveTheRed 19:44, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, it's gone. Wikipedia must have been experiencing a lag. DaveTheRed 19:46, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The sentence inserted in the introductory paragraph "These sound trademarks are memes constructed to lodge in one's memory to easily remember the brand" was deleted, as 'trademarks' are very distinct from 'brands'. Any references to (philosophy of) branding and marketing concepts would be more appropriately dealt with in the branding article. — 15 Mar 2005.
:The only reason that sentence was there is because it was merged from Sound logo. I agree that the sentence was awkward, but it would be nice to have something about how sound trademarks are often memes designed to get stuck in your brain. DaveTheRed 18:49, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to sound marks as memes (branding)
Talk:Amanda Bynes

message: Subject is not actively in the public eye as an actress. They were under conservatorship for nearly a decade, which includes the time those statements were made. Unless someone can show enduring coverage in quality sources, these events should be left out. Slywriter (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "engagement" and "pregnancy" 

message: It would be cool if you could include the activism that is currently going on for Amanda’s safety. Free Amanda Bynes 81.97.140.245 (talk) 23:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Sundayclose (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amanda Bynes 

message: The personal twitter link for Amanda links to an unrelated person, not Amanda Bynes (Actress).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:401:8281:4AB0:E981:8E70:88F3:4210 (talk) 03:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal twitter link is incorrect 

message: Under the “mental health and substance abuse problems” section it states that Amanda Bynes has passed away. This is not true. 2603:9000:6901:E6E3:FCA2:650A:9151:7A10 (talk) 21:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2024
Talk:Another Perfect Day

message: everyhit.com  lists no 20. Alf 22:16, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: sources

message: Didn't Eddie Clarke have writing credits on a couple of songs on the album? 2A07:A880:4601:1051:C3CC:AF03:3B91:B8A6 (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing credits
Talk:Warwickshire/Archive

message: We should probably mention somewhere the Campaign for real Warwickshire.
James F. 18:58, 30 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Campaign for real Warwickshire 

message: Clunky and difficult to fix: anyone in, say, Yardley (South Birmingham, but until 1911 a village in Worcestershire) would have said, in 1973, that they lived in Birmingham, Warwickshire. Andy Mabbett 21:55, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: part of Birmingham
Talk:Sayula, Jalisco

message: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayula. Johnleemk | Talk 10:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed AFD 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Middle Ages/New Articles

message: Should we remove some of these articles from the list, after they are no longer "new"? Maybe we should list them by month or something...although I know I frequently find relatively new articles from earlier in the year. Or should we just keep listing them the way we are now? Adam Bishop 20:57, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: An issue that must be faced eventually. Why not remove them after, say, two months? Keeps us on our toes. We can add any to our watchlists in the course of two months. Sensible? --Wetman 23:45, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Someone hinted at a move to subtlety (dish). Is there need for it when there is no other article on it? I don't know of too many other encyclopedic definitions for subtlety that would be relevant.
Peter Isotalo 11:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subtlety
Talk:Bad Ischl

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 02:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

message: Which of Franz Joseph's descendants owns the place?  the Windischgrätz? john k 16:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  current ownership 

message: The article mentions http://www.glosk.com/GM/Linde/17283/pages/List_of_subcamps_of_Dachau/84737_en.htm as a source.  However, that page credits our article List of subcamps of Dachau as its source.   I made that clear in the article.     We still need a proper external source. 
81.5.248.75 18:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dachau -- wikipedia source 

message: During my visit to that concentration camp, it was mentioned in museum there that office for the menegment of all the concentration camps was stationed at Bad Ischl. I would like to have a confirmation for this item. Forgive me for my possible poor spelling.46.120.250.154 (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: sachsenhausen

message: In the article, about famous people related with Bad Ischl, you have missed, in my opinion, a gret one: Brahms spent his holidays many years in Bad Ischl. There he composed a lot of works (for example the whole corpus of piano pieces from Op. 116 to 119. It´s known that, at the end of his life he broke and threw to the Traun a lot of unfinished pieces which didn´t deserve upon him to be realized. So, you could add this great composer to Bad Ischl in this page. Thank you very much. 79.157.147.215 (talk) 08:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Ischl and Johannes Brahms
Talk:Projector (disambiguation)

message: That type of redirect irritates me because why link if it is going to point at the same page? --Anonymous Cow 21:19, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why link to "Digital Projector" if it is just going to redirect to this page?

message: Santtus 11:29, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  added link to [[projection screen]] 

message: Most of the pages that this links to is just different types of projects. There should be an article that explains what a projector is, and a bit about different types of projectors with links to those pages  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.18.216.204 (talk) 13:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the disambiguation page could stay and a new article called image projector be made as a common page for image projectors. 195.18.216.204 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  should not be disambiguation page 
Talk:List of Macedonians (ethnic group)

message: More than half of these articles or names should be deleted because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.   As for the list here one should raise the following concern:
:All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references
178.148.119.189 (talk) 22:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for deletion or reduction of the List of Macedonians
File talk:MagrittePipe.jpg

message: Why is this painting part of the surrealist movement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sillstaw (talk • contribs) 23:20, 4 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 

message: I just saw this painting at the Menil Collection in Houston along with several of his other works such as Galconde--and yet the page says this painting is in the LACMA in Los Angeles.  These paintings have been at the Menil for at least a year and a half.  I've been twice and saw the Magritte paintings both times.  This should be changed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Letcher (talk • contribs) 06:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menil Collection 

message: Un jour comme tous les jours j'etais entraine de marcher dans la meme ville rien n'est speciale . Des gens parts et d'autres viennes on partage les memes routes la meme ville peut étre on a les meme pensais . Chaqun à ses rêves les memes idées mais de vie differentes . Peut c'est la vie qui n'es pas équitable , elle traumatise les réveures par la realité . Ce qui fait nous tousse ont partagaient de telle sorte la meme vie meme si on'a des réves differents . Ce peut étre choquant a certaines moments . 41.188.106.3 (talk) 23:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pluie d'hommes qui s'abat sur la ville (1953) de Magritte
Talk:Prehistoric Irish battles

message: "Some of the battles listed here may have been mythological." - since there is no historical evidence at all, that may be an understatement.  I assume the dates (AM) are presumably from the Ussher Calendar. --Henrygb 22:30, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: This article is not remotely encyclopedic. I've rewritten the intro to remove some of the worst errors (claiming these battles occurred in early Irish history misleadingly suggests that they can reliably said to have happened, which they can't, and conflicts with the article title - prehistory and early history are two different periods). However, multiple issues remain. It relies on one source, the Annals of the Four Masters, which is very late, and misleading gives the impression that its chronology can be regarded as absolute, when other annalistic and chronicle sources, from the early annals and the Lebor Gabála to Keating, have different chronologies, and all of them are artificial. I think this article could conceivably be useful to a reader interested in finding out more about how the Irish reconstructed their ancient past, but as it currently stands it's virtually worthless. I'll see what can be done to improve it, but it will take time. --Nicknack009 (talk) 07:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues
Talk:Post-Zionism

message: I understand there's some debate (and probably honest overlap) on whether post-Zionism is anti-Zionistic or not, or whether only parts of post-Zionist thinking are anti-Zionist, but the section in the article basically says that post-Zionism 'is' anti-Zionism and thus strikes me as blatantly POV, especially considering that the rest of the article maintains that there is a debate on the issue.  It's also telling that the post-Zionism == anti-Zionism statement is the only sourced statement in the article, and it's sourced to an op-ed piece in Haaretz.  Not necessarily the most neutral source around.  --The Centipede (talk) 16:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV "Post-Zionism as Anti-Zionism" section 

message: Hi,  All of the links that are posted are critiques of new historians.  I have put up links that explain post-zionism, not just from the academia stand-point but from those who suffer under zionism (including Jews of Mizrahi and Sephardic descent) and they are continously removed.  I am in support of freedom of speech and am agree that critiques should be posted but what do I do when some right winger with too much time on his/her hands continues to remove links that explain post-zionism?  Shame.  Discussion is a two way street.  
Why was the section mentioning criticism of the New Historians removed?  Has it been moved somewhere? Jayjg (talk) 22:38, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of the New Historians section removed 

message: It is far from being completed - it still needs a lot of grammar corrections and more editing. you are all more than welcome to hjoin and help improve it. Acidburn24m (talk) 06:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Hebrew version looks like it has better references? —Ashley Y 01:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Translated the parralel article from the Hebrew Wikipedia 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:44, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: The vast majority of the content in this article is entirely unsourced and comes across as WP:OR, especially the bulleted list of questions Post-Zionists ask. JohnR1Roberts (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious lack of citations.