Talk:Dog agility

message: I have reviewed this article according to the GA criteria and have unfortunately decided to fail this article. The article, although very comprehensive, needs more referencing. None of the information has inline citations, which should be added after any statement that a reader may question about its verifiability. There are plenty of images in the first half of the article, but there are only two for the rest of the article, so maybe consider spacing some of them out a bit. I know that some of the images correspond with the specific event, but they should also be reduced a little in size. The article is also very long, maybe consider extending parts of the articles off into another article and just have a short summary of the section left on this article. Consider getting a peer review for other editors to take a look over the article and see if there are other recommendations that they may have to improve it. Please do consider renominating again once you have addressed these issues. If you believe this review is in error, see Wikipedia:Good article review. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as  I can. --Nehrams2020 00:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA failed

message: Just thought that I would add Dog Sports to your page. I wrote the article about Dock Jumping.gd8man 01:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dog Sports 

message: This article has a TON of vandalism. It should be reverted to the last edit by D'ohBot to get rid of it all.
:Done. Apparently one editor reverted one of the vandals, but only got the last edit by that vandal. Mark Shaw (talk) 15:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: This article is a mess. I cleaned up here and there and added references until I ran out of time to work on this. I propose changing the Agility Worldwide section to Sanctioning Bodies, and outlining on that page the different organizations which sanction agility around the world (right now there are only two). IMO that would make more sense and could be better organized than the page is now. As an idea, one could make a table of the different governing bodies and highlight major rule differences between them (such as jump heights, use of obstacles, etc). Finally, there are a lot of pictures on this page compared to the text those pictures are related to. Furiizaa (talk) 06:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently people are putting in their dogs pics, I think pictures do help explain the different obstacles. With that said there should be only one (1) picture of each obstacle, and maybe better ones than are in the article.I will spend a little time and go back and check if there are better pics. Oh and why do we need to see a pic of ribbons? gd8man (talk) 08:38, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a lot of work 

message: I've kept it at C because it still needs more references -- there are many unsupported statements that could be questioned. – anna 08:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for taking a look. Now that the Spring Agility trialing season is winding down a bit I might actually have some time to take a look at this page. Mark Shaw (talk) 12:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessment for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs|WikiProject Dogs]] 

message: How do others feel about including a video clip in place of one of the many photos? There are several already on Commons (I'm sure there are some on Flickr as well, but I haven't checked there yet). – anna 07:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, even a couple or three videos sounds like a great idea to me. This article is a natural for dynamic media. Mark Shaw (talk) 13:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video 

message: and the handler can touch neither dog nor obstacles,  think should be can't** touch cause has the nor words Plasma laser (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error maybe in first paragraph  

message: i think you should add in their that mixed breeds can do it too i have a dog named ace border collie lab mix and i just found out that mutts can go in the akc and it is really exciting because for the longest time they could not stallion gal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stallion gal (talk • contribs) 19:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  agility 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dog agility. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719223258/http://www.k9cpe.com/forms/2011rb.pdf to http://www.k9cpe.com/forms/2011rb.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It has been requested that this list be converted to footnotes and footnotes applied to the end of each equipment paragraph for all of the organizations. In this case, leaving the list as is makes much more sense to me, in terms of what people will be looking for and to reduce frustration (if I saw footnotes on all of the paragraphs, I'd expect the footnotes to be to different places for each paragraph, but no, they'd all be to the same places for all the paragraphs).  Elf | Talk 17:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of equipment specifications 

message: Not notable as a standalone article Doug Weller talk 14:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been asked by User:LoraxJr if what they've done is enough. I presume it should all be merged? Doug Weller talk 13:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello , I have left a message for  at WT:DOGS, I still think the article should be merged with the vast majority deleted in the process. I would be happy to do it if you and LoraxJr would like me to. Regards, Cavalryman (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks, I'd appreciate it. I think User:LoraxJr would also but we can wait until they reply. Doug Weller talk 17:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would happily do that, but how we decide what to keep? I think a section about International competitions is important, also National Championships and titling can be merged together and also kept. Most of the other information can go...LoraxJr 23:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

text:  I have looked through Dog agility article, it appears that there already exits the section about titles, it is rather short and general, do you think it would be beneficial to move there information from the article we are merging, those paragraphs that have sources of course. Titling in agility is rather complicated and fascinating. LoraxJr 23:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Geography of dog agility]] into [[Dog agility]]