lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1-2-3 (Len Barry song)

message: According the the BMI Website, Holland-Dozier-Holland of Motown fame are co-writers of the song. Further, it's legal title, according to BMI is "One Two Three."  Unfortunately, the Library of Congress Website doesn't have online access for records pre-1978. Beautiful, huh? If someone near DC, with no axe to grind, could visit ye old Library and research this, it would be loverly--thanks upfront. If not, I'm consider renaming and ripping the guts out of the article. Looks like a whitewash to me, in more ways than one. And I didn't think of the pun initially! Regards Tapered (talk) 06:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. I flew off the handle after reading the info-box. I've written to BMI to find out if Holland Dozier Holland collect royalties on the song, which would contradict some of Barry's statement. If I learn anything I can verify, I will modify the article. Tapered (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Lousy Article, Here's Why
Talk:Follow Me Home (film)

message: i saw the movie last night and was surprised to see there was not a page here dedicated to it.  so, i created one. :) any assitance is appreciated.
Breshannon 19:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Vladimir Vysotsky (admiral)

message: Can we use the patronymic to disambiguate, instead of a parenthetical? And while we’re at it, fix the surname ending per WP:RUS guidance on “-ий endings”.  I propose moving it to “Vladimir Sergeyevich Vysotsky” — thoughts? -- Y not? 16:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it. -- Y not? 14:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Black Tuna Gang

message: Did anybody go to jail as a result of the prosecutions?  Did they all even get caught?  Or did most get away?  Or maybe most of them rotted in prison.  Thanks in advance to anybody that knows.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.141.170 (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kensington station (Maryland)

message: There is no direct support in the two references of this article (both online) that the name of this place is "Kensington Station".  The closest is this quote: "Because of his great influence, Warner was able to convince others to name the town, the post office and train station "Kensington"  when the town was incorporated in 1894."  That is unclear whether the train station is named Kensington Train Station, or other possible options.
The station is included in the NRHP-listed Kensington Historic District, whose NRHP application/inventory documents would be one good source for how the station is named. 
Also, the Kensington Historical Society's archives webpage includes a historic photo showing the station building and labelling it "B&O Railway station, 1901".
"Kensington Station" as name seems to suggest a location in the Kensington area of London, to me, so perhaps "Kensington Station (Kensington, Maryland)" would be better.
"Kensington (MARC station)" is an alternative, too.
I would prefer for there to be more actual sources found which refer to the name of the station building, if one exists, from the NRHP and the Kensington Historical Society, before proposing a rename of this article. doncram (talk) 21:59, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  name of article 

message: The address is currently stated to be 10417 Howard Avenue.  This is incorrect.  The approximate address is 3701 Howard Ave, Kensington, MD 20895, which is the address given by MapQuest(http://www.mapquest.com/us/maryland/business-kensington/kensington-marc-station-303176738).  This is about half a mile from the address in the article.  Cerberus (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect address 
Talk:Level Mountain

message: Sometime around I'm going to change this from a mountain article to a volcanology article because I'm sure the Level Mountain Range is a lot more important as a volcanological subject rather than as a mountain topic, also because of the WikiProject ratings. The Level Mountain Range is the most voluminous and most persistent volcano in Canada and the series of U-shaped valleys and ridges that constitute the Level Mountain Range proposes an unique prospect to view cross sections through a shield volcano. Black Tusk (talk) 05:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change from mountain to volcano article 

message: Please create an edit notice for the article, placing in it the template . Thank you. Volcanoguy 23:31, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Jo-Jo Eumerus, since you are an administrator, you might be able to help with this. Volcanoguy 06:33, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

text: , and thank you for your input! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 17:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadian English [[WP:editnotice|editnotice]] request

message: "Level Mountain is a large volcanic complex ... located 50 km NNW of Telegraph Creek and 60 km W of Dease Lake." Unless Telegraph Creek and Dease Lake have moved, the actual distances are 65 km and 81 km respectively. Meszah Peak is the only named prominence, and is close to the centre of the complex; its page gives its location as "66 km north of Telegraph Creek" - so the 50 km figure seems wrong. Would someone care to confirm? Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 06:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing wrong it's just different measurements from different points of the mountain. They appear to differ greatly because of how big the mountain is; its summit and base are kilometres apart. Volcanoguy 07:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:IBM Parallel Sysplex

message: Why does it require z/OS R.8 for an ICF-only implementation to be viable? With CF Duplexing many installations I know run without external CFs. Martin Packer 20:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There were some improvements introduced in z/OS 1.8 for more efficient CF duplexing and rebuilding CF structures. That statement in the article makes sense to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BBCWatcher (talk • contribs) 14:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebuilding CF structures 

message: I think the two articles can be combined into a more fleshed out single article.  In my view, GDPS is a subset of Parallel Sysplex and therefore describing the two can be done in a single article.  Both articles are fairly stubby.  In looking at IBM Geographically Dispersed Parallel Sysplex to try and clean it up I thought it may be better to combine them.  Any thoughts from others?  --TreyGeek (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have written up a combined version of the three articles (IBM Sysplex, IBM Parallel Sysplex, and IBM Geographically Dispersed Parallel Sysplex).  It can be viewed in my sandbox: User:TreyGeek/sandbox.  I would appreciate any comments or suggestions.  If there are no arguments against the proposed merge, I will perform it next weekend (April 25/26).  --TreyGeek (talk) 22:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Corporate Ministry

message: Joey Abs wasn't in the Corporate Ministry
He didn't even debut in the WWE until 2000, at the time of this stable he was still in Maryland Championship Wrestling. Stop changing it so he's listed here  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.27.11.106 (talk) 00:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He made his WWF debut on June 21, 1999. Yes, he was a member of the Corporate Ministry, along with the rest of the Mean Street Posse. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 12:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes, that happened. They returned in June and were a part of the Corporate Ministry. This included Joey Abs. The Corporate Ministry didn't disband until Septmeber 1999. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 18:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joey Abs 

message: I did an edit in which I placed Vince McMahon as the Higher Power under the "Leader" in the members section, but it was reverted and the person who did it said Vince wasn't part of the Corporate Ministry and was kicked out by Shane.
Vince being kicked out was part of the plan. "The Higher Power", which turned out to be Vince, was the true mastermind and leader of the Corporate Ministry, and he lead the faction afterwards until his was temporarily "banished" from the WWE. The Corporate Ministry was his plan to screw Austin. Undertaker was just doing his bidding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Showster (talk • contribs) 19:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vince McMahon as the Higher Power 
Talk:Lector priest

message: Kerheb is a duplicate of this article, and the two should definitely be merged. I believe that the merged article belongs under this title, as "lector priest" is definitely the term most used in English-language sources. Most or all sources that mention lector priests, such as the article on "priesthood" in the Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, give the Egyptian term once (usually in the form given in this article, ẖry-ḥb.t, rather than a transcription like "kerheb") and then use "lector priest" throughout the rest of the text.
In any case, there is no reason for both these stub articles to exist, aside from the confusion created by the differing transcription and transliteration systems for Egyptian words and by the inadequate organization of WP's ancient Egypt articles. A. Parrot (talk) 04:54, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody showed up to agree or disagree, so I did the merge. Or, rather, I turned kerheb into a redirect, as all the useful information in it was already present here. A. Parrot (talk) 05:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Sisters of Life

message: It seems the Sacred Heart (Suffern, NY) Convent should be included here. Michael V Gold (talk) 19:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacred Heart (Suffern, NY) Convent 

message: — Assignment last updated by Selfrink (talk) 17:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: JMC 440 Research Methods in Public Relations
Talk:India Catalina

message: * I added a "tone" template, to flag the fact that the tone is not as neutral and encyclopedic as Wikipedia standards specify. E.g. "thanks to her treacherous ways" is over-the-top. Huttarl (talk) 15:26, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William R. Boone High School

message: Please don't put student names in the article for clubs. Doing so sets a precedent for which all clubs and organizations would be entitled to list their president, captain, or sponsor. Also, I'm about to add a section on notable alumni. Keep "vanity" out of it. Thanks.
fish 20:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I'll be reverting anything that isn't balanced and inclusive to all sports. Yes, a season summary will be included. Be patient, and don't make counterproductive edits. -fish (talk) 02:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 Football Season 

message: I removed the following tags:
* external links - I edited the external links; I think they're OK now.
* overlinked - I removed a few wikilinks, but left the ones in the table of subjects alone. Since this is a school article, I thought that links to school subjects and school sports were OK.
* refimprove - while there are still many primary source references, there are also many secondary sources.
Leschnei (talk) 02:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags removed 
Talk:Boudouaou

message: there is no water or rods no life at all  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.124.123 (talk) 18:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  boudouaou 
Talk:Munni Begum

message: Hi,
I think Munni begum is quite notable singer 
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20051009/cth2.htm
http://www.ptv.com.pk/singer12.asp
http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/web1/07jan12/national.htm
http://www.despardes.com/pakistan/newsbriefs/2007/20070131.html
List of Albums:
http://www.theorchard.com/dist/artistPage.php?artist_id=78564
May 13, 2007, New Jersey â Ghulam Ali & Munni Begum Concert. May 12, 2007 (http://musicbela.com/events.htm)
If you consider google: Results 1 - 100 of about 30,000 for "MUNNI BEGUM "
Also please consider What links here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Munni_Begum
I dont know if she is not notable then what is notable--amit (talk) Amit ÐÐ¼Ð¸Ñ à¤à¤®à¤¿à¤¤ Yadav Ð¯Ð´Ð°Ð² à¤¯à¤¾à¤¦à¤µ 20:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you need to add supporting reference to her in the news, links to her record statistics, concerts etc. on the main article page please. --Blowdart 21:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From the above sources, I get the feeling that Munni Begum is notable enough for Wikipedia. However, the article as it stands doesn't prove her notability. For this reason, I have changed the nomination for speedy deletion to a proposal for deletion (prod). This should give the article's author a chance to improve the article. I suggest that he or she reads our manual of style and our notability guidelines for singers, before doing so. AecisBrievenbus 23:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Done, I hope now it is ok, Also the tag says I should remove that tag once updated else it will be deleted... I hope that doesnot count as vandalism... I am sorry if I am not supposed to remove that  âPreceding unsigned comment added by Imdabs (talk â¢ contribs) 04:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article is stating that she left East Pakistan for West Pakistan during the War of 1973.  There was no war of 1973.  Did she leave during the war of 1971 or after the war, in 1973? Inf fg (talk) 12:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: War of 1973
Talk:Burnsall

message: Even apart from the fact that the gallery is overlapping with the infobox, the gallery of images seems excessive for such a short article. WP is an encyclopedia, not a guidebook or picturebook. Shouldn't the bulk of the photos be put a WP:Commons with a link? WP:MOSIMAGES says "Use  to link to more images on Commons, wherever possible. If there are too many images in a given article, a link to the Commons is a good solution. Use of galleries should be in keeping with Wikipedia's image use policy." although this last is somewhat inconclusive. I've looked at London for comparison, where each image sits alongside a paragraph of relevant text - the balance between text and images seems much more appropriate. PamD (talk) 08:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Excess of images
Talk:Too Much Time on My Hands

message: Wikipedia can do SO much better than this! Look at the articles for hit singles not half as good as this one! I shit you not, this article can be easily expanded.
72.91.190.180 21:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I heard somewhere that there were some people the thought there was a backmasked Satanic message in this song or something like that. Maybe a really stupid rumor some idiot said, but if someone finds anything like that, maybe consider putting that in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.88.50.105 (talk) 23:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Right band (for the rumors), wrong song. See Snowblind and Heavy Metal Poisoning. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed backmasking?
Template talk:S-start-collapsible

message: I re-added a header. The reason is that a collapsible table ALWAYS needs a th-element in the table, otherwise it cannot collapse. Since this template was used on successionboxes that didn't have a header, it was breaking several pages in wikipedia. If anyone's got a better idea, i love to hear it. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:06, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lung lobectomy

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Lobectomy (lung) →  – To me this seems like a more natural specification; this is also the only article titled "Lobectomy" having a disambiguator. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 June 2022
Talk:Gudgeonville Covered Bridge

message: This section appears to give too much credence to the idea that these supernatural phenomena are real. --Jemiller226 (talk) 03:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superstition section 

message: The picture from 2015 looks like the same bridge that was in place on Google Maps as of 2019. Has anything changed in that regard? Snowman304|talk 09:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was a permanent replacement bridge added?
Talk:Miles Falcon

message: According to this it first flew September 23 1934, not October 12. (The MacRobertson Race begain on October 20, so the latter date would have left little time to prepare.) Can anyone confirm either of these dates? Drutt 05:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I got the 12 October 1934 first flight of the prototype G-ACTM from The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft Vol 11 Page 2498, the other source I used British Civil Aircraft since 1919 did not give a first flight date just a Certificate of Airworthiness date of 9 October 1934. So you are probably correct, just need somebody to pop in with more sources. MilborneOne 18:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I note that the waricaero site (ref 2 in the article, newly added and which looks well researched) also gives the date as 1934-10-12.  Since neither of these websites quotes sources it's hard to resolve; perhaps JAWA 1935 would help, or contemporary volumes of Flight etc.TSRL (talk) 11:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Michael Stout

message: In the interest of full disclosure: I know Michael Stout personally, and am an active follower of his blog.  However, I created this article because he is a notable game designer, and tried to maintain a strictly neutral viewpoint.  My statement about his critical praise is purely present to establish notability, and the references are there to demonstrate the verifiability of my claims.
As someone who reads his blog and follows his career, I am more knowledgeable about him as a subject than someone more personally removed might be.  However, my neutrality is obviously questionable, so I would appreciate it if someone more experienced and removed from the subject could review it.  If nothing else, I stand to learn about the Wikipedia process.  DaWarMage 21:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: I'm going to see if I can get this up to a "Start" rating, so I've expanded a bit.  The section on uselessopinions.com is a bit rough, but it seemed relevant.  I also found the link for an interview I heard him give, so I included that.
My next goal is to get a picture of him that I can add to the Infobox.  Everything I've found so far is either terrible or has copyright problems (or both).  DaWarMage 21:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: On Going Work
Talk:Miles Merlin

message: I have inserted the height given by Lukins and Russell, which has the most complete spec to which I have access.  The notes at the start of Jackson's book makes it plain why an aircraft height may have different values.  This is particularly so for a tail wheel, single engined a/c where prop position can matter a lot, and the "rigging pposition" is not known.  So the height is the "agreed value".  I've adopted L&R's value here for two reasons:
1)  It is in their set, the one now quoted as source.  Previously no data ref was given, so we did not know where the 7' 5.5" value came from.  If anyone has it, and it's authoritative (unfortunately Jackson does not give a height for the Merlin), let's have it, referenced.
2) L&R and Jackson have 6 single engined Miles aircraft in common, and in 5 cases their heights agree (exception is the M2F).  It's likely, perhaps, that Jackson would have agreed with L&R on the M6 as well.
L&R give 1/72 plans, so one ought to be able to spot where the height measurement was made if "rigging" position is horizontal.  Seems to work (to top of fin, vertical prop is lower) for the Merlin, but some other Miles machines are more puzzling!
TSRL (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Style (literature)

message: This page needs lots of work.  Please join in. Mike Klaassen 21:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs work

message: I intend to rewrite Writing style and merge Style (literature) and Writer's voice into Writing style, as the general consensus of these three articles is that they are all poorly written, should be rewritten, and should be merged.  If anyone has any objections, please discuss now.—Anita5192 (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Writing style and Writer's voice
Talk:Project mandate

message: Project mandate is a step in a process leading up to writing a business proposal. 
IMHO this is industry lingo that lends little benefit to readers. 
References on the page "Business Proposal" all outline common practices leading up to and including writing a business proposal. Readers wanting to delve into the specifics and details can do so from those links. 
If a further discussion of how complex sales work, and the specifics of writing a business proposal are welcome, we will be looking at a fairly lengthy and involved branch for Wikipedia. For instance, just one of the references on the page "Business Proposal", consists of over 200 web pages. All the references are specific to the process of creating business proposals. 
If this step is included, many others are as important and should be included.
How far down the rabbit hole does Wikipedia want to go?
Lricci 21:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Vigilante 8 Arcade

message: *IGN DLC info
*IGN hands on
*GameSpot reveal
*Shacknews on release delay
*Kotaku on release delay
*Joystiq interview
*IGN interview
For article expansion --Teancum (talk) 02:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Fungal infection

message: The article might be better named "Fungal infections" or "Fungal diseases" . Whispyhistory (talk) 06:52, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest with you, I disagree. Per WP:PLURAL. This article is about a single phenomenon (Mycosis AKA "Fungal Infection") which has many different etiologies. But all of them are ultimately causing an infection of the human body via a fungal pathogen. So I think this name is actually appropriate. If you want to do the RM, by all means, go ahead! There may be consensus to change the name, we cannot know for sure. But also be prepared to get a lot of pushback, as WP:PLURAL arguments are usually swift and decisive. I've seen a few of them and they never turn out as expected.--Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 21:18, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for comment .... Would be interesting to hear other thoughts. Whispyhistory (talk) 03:37, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus for page to be moved to Fungal infection. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 03:57, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Mycosis →  – Common term, used by several main textbooks, "Mycoses" a possible alternative. Term describes numerous types of conditions caused by numerous types of fungi. Whispyhistory (talk) 03:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

text: * Or..Fungal infection as an alternate singular. Whispyhistory (talk) 15:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

text: *:That option sounds even better. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks...Fungal infection sounds good Whispyhistory (talk) 12:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 August 2021