lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of role-playing video games

message: Where possible, should we arrange entries within a single year by their date of release? For example m199h (if it actually existed) was the first of the RPGs for the Plato, followed by pedit5. From there, the chronology of 75's other releases gets a bit hazy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.56.138.131 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intra-year Chronology 

message: Each sublist has its own talk page, along with this central talk page, which I think is unnecessary. It means that any comments will be split across 20 separate pages. We should merge all the talk pages together, i.e. move their content to this central page and then change them to redirect to this central page. This would be consistent with other video game lists on Wikipedia. Any objections to doing this? Kidburla (talk) 21:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: and have also enabled archiving for the page, so that we can see a lot of the old posts get archived, including those from subpages. Kidburla (talk) 19:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge talk pages 

message: Is there  reason why there isn't a List of role-playing video games: 2022 to 2023 article? Thanks. Praemonitus (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it was previously deleted because of WP:TOOSOON. As that is no longer applicable, I'm going to re-create the page. Praemonitus (talk) 17:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022-2023
Talk:Gyeongbokgung

message: I never heard that Gyeongbok palace is still used by the ex-royal family of Chosun dynasty. They don't live there. I corrected it but somebody changed it back.
:No, I haven't either. Now it turns to be a museum. --Aphaea 00:54, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: I have replaced the picture with the old version. I like the new picture, too, but its licence is unclear. Also, the old picture is a featured picture... Kokiri 18:36, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Several sections of the article appeared to be in violation of copyright regulations. The material appears to have been copied from the following source: , among others.  Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material. I have removed the sections of copyrighted material, and after some time, I will be deleting them from the page history in order to remove the precense of copyrighted material from the Wiki. However, the material is in the page history for now, if anyone wants to try and re-write the information to not be in copyright violation. Please do not re-add copyrighted material to the article. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 02:07, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations 

message: This royal palace along with others in Seoul has been called in several spelling such as below
#Gyeongbokgung (original name)
#Gyeongbokgung Palace
#Gyeongbok Palace
so I move it back to the original title to discuss it for the matter. I think this naming matter is associated with other suffixes such as san (산 mountain), sa or am (사, 암, Buddhist temple), so this can't be simply spelled. --Appletrees (talk) 16:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well Wiki rule on languages states to use English. Gryffindor (talk) 22:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title 

message: Why would a dead queen need quarters? Do you mean the Queen Dowager (taebimama)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.223.181 (talk) 13:06, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Late Queen? 

message: As title. Huge chunks of it have no sources and have some formatting/style issues. The names of individual buildings in the body don't need to be bolded. toobigtokale (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleaning
Talk:Deoksugung

message: This is my first time posting on this thing, though I peruse it often; anyway, I remember from my trip to Korea the tour guide mentioning something about erm... "Haetae," I guess would be a romization of it.  I'm not sure.  They're supposed to be these mythical water beasts, built to ward against fire.  Does anyone have any more information, or think these statues might warrant an article of their own (as the mythical creature, I suppose), or mention in this one?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haetae this is the article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ICIWORLD (talk • contribs) 06:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Haetae"? 

message: Why was the infobox image replaced? The previous image served just as well (better, in my opinion), and has a more universal usage on wikis. Why a replacement without a discussion?Mark Froelich (talk) 22:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image 
Talk:Tiger II

message: This very incorrect statement is at the beginning of the "Gun and armor performance" section. Whenever I edit it to note that the British did indeed bring MANY heavy tanks into service, such as various variations of the Matilda, Valentine and Churchill, but that they were outclassed by the Tiger II, it keeps getting removed. Why is that?2601:245:C101:9C70:A59E:5B97:996E:21D2 (talk) 21:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Matilda weighed 25 tons, same as the German medium tank, the Panzer IV. Valentine was lighter than Matilda. And Churchill was same weight as the Panther. All three British tanks had guns similar to their contemporaries. They don't meet the definition of a "heavy" by being bigger and carrying a bigger gun. Compare to TOG, Excelsior, Tortoise GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Weight is irrelevant, they were classified as infantry tanks, which are basically heavy tanks, so they count (I'm the same guy, different device).2601:245:C101:9C70:24F6:7FCC:929D:DD0B (talk) 03:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Infantry tanks are not heavy tanks per se. The cruiser/infantry split is a different axis to the light-medium-heavy one. But it boils down to needing sources that say UK put a heavy tank into service. GraemeLeggett (talk) 07:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

text: The Churchill Mk VII (A22F) could be very legitimately be considered a heavy tank, it's frontal armor was thicker than the Tiher I's, and was soetimes called the "heavy Churchill".2601:245:C101:9C70:1052:9B5:3A6C:7E54 (talk) 22:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...the British...forces [never] brought heavy tanks into service" 

message: E-109 188.239.235.147 (talk) 15:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  E-100 

message: MAUS 188.239.235.147 (talk) 15:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAUS
Talk:Wendy M. Grossman

message: I plan to do rewrite of this page. If anyone is already working on this let me know. If there is anything you'd like me to add then please notify me. Thanks! TheDragonHypothesis (talk) 16:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite Page 

message: Hello, 
I wanted to let people know that I posted that I was doing a re-write of the page in Sept 2020 but there were some minor changes made recently. I am getting ready to publish the re-write and preserve changes, if possible. 
Thanks, TheDragonHypothesis (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes (Will try to preserve as best I can)
Talk:Under One Roof

message: From VfD:
*No idea who nominated this (so I'm leaving space above), but I don't see the problem.  It's a disambiguation page that doesn't link off to the first two series, which would probably be close to non-notable and end up here, and the amount of information offered on all three is fair.  It could be cleaned up and Anglicized, but that's not a VfD matter. Keep
**Odd.  I signed.  I was chiding the nominator for not signing. I'll sign again. Geogre 20:30, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Comedy for Peace

message: This is a stub and apperantly won't be getting any longer. I copied the entire text of this article into the article Projects working for peace among Israelis and Arabs and placed it in this section. Anybody has an objection to turn this article into a redirect to Projects_working_for_peace_among_Israelis_and_Arabs#Comedy_For_Peace? MathKnight 14:17, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Industrial musical

message: This is my first page and I'm hoping to improve it. (Good grammar has never been my strong point).  I've added links to it on the pages for advertising and musical theater.  It could have a list of composers.  It would be informative to have a section about the different types of song contents, but I don't feel qualified to write it.  There are two collectors of albums (Jonathan Ward and Steve Young) whom I can try to contact for this, if I can track down their e-mail addresses. Tomt 14:32, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: My personal statement

message: Does anyone know of any references to industrial musicals in popular culture? (There may have been a possible reference to one in Player Piano.) Orville Eastland (talk) 03:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in popular culture?
Talk:The Uplift Mofo Party Plan

message: This article is far too biased against the band's early career, criticises their later career, and is not impartial. The Wikipedia pages for the previous two albums before this are much more appropriate for a template. Could somebody clean this up?
:Most of this article is a review of the album, not an encyclopedia article; by Wikipedia standards, nonsense. I'm simply deleting most of it. Elrith 07:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is considered by some to be the band's best album.That sounds like weasel words to me.Mustang6172 07:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: It is considered by some to be the band's best album.I realise it's considered one of the band's best early albums, maybe one of thier best overall, but it's not considered THE best. Defunct Lies 18:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: This article was erroneous in detailing the chart history. This album never reached the top 100 on the Billboard Charts. It did however make the top 200 and it only peaked at 147 and that was in 1988. Paralleluniverse 00:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart History 

message: "Flea incorporated a "slap" bass style on the album, which would become a staple of the band's early work.Apter, 2004. pp. 70–74"
There is already plenty of slapping in the previous two albums by the band, so he did not incorporate slapping on this album. Did he incorporate a new slap style? Then this needs to be explained further. I do not have access to the referenced book, so I cannot actually verify this information myself... 188.62.168.221 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:29, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Slap" bass style
Talk:Mulanje Massif

message: Google shows me 2,900 refs to "mulanje massif" vs 900 for "mount mulanje". That strongly suggests moving, unless the 2,900 refs are ignorant or mistaken in some way. Stan 15:19, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Be sure to enclose the search strings in double quotes, otherwise you get random spurious stuff where the two words just happen to be on the same page, but maybe referring to different things - 'mount mulanje' gets 2,900, while '"mount mulanje"' is just 898. 'mulanje massif' gets only a couple hundred more than '"mulanje massif"', probably because 'massif' is more of a specific term - 'mount' by itself might be referring to horses, disk drives, etc. :-) There's a bit of art to getting and interpreting Google results, I always want to get some kind of independent corroboration. One of the good news/bad news developments is that WP content itself is being mirrored to more and more places, and is beginning to noticeably skew Google results. Lays an extra responsibility on us to be as accurately researched as possible... Stan 23:05, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Freaky Styley

message: How does the cover art represent Last Judgement? Its just them jumping in different costumes. This "fact" should be taken out. Cdylan13 16:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, no, not really. If you look between them, you'll see that there is a painting with parts of Michelangelo's Last Judgement. Tooga - BØRK! 14:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  oh ok i see know. thanks for clarifying. Cdylan13 14:36, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Judgement 

message: Currently, the article makes the following uncited claim: "To the band's amazement, founding drummer, Jack Irons decided to return."  This event simply doesn't seem strike me as particularly amazing.  The wikipedia article about Irons himself implies that he was still on good terms with the other band members, and came back after other gigs fell through— and it gives no reason why anyone should have been amazed that he rejoined the band. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 23:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Jack Irons's return amazing?
Talk:The Abbey Road E.P.

message: Can I move this to The Abbey Road E.P.? I'm assuming the "E.P." has been dropped from the title because that's the WP convention, but the abbreviated title doesn't really make sense in this case. sjorford 23:55, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: I've tried looking it up, but no joy. The band has seemingly never talked out it. How did they keep the socks from falling off? Rubber bands? A special kind of sock? Did they not bother? Whenever I try this sort of thing the sock eventually swings free; I have to know.-Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Socks
Talk:Mutation (genetic algorithm)

message: It is not mentioned in the article where the mutation operation is used in the GA. There are N chromosomes in the last step. ( I say them old N chromosomes)
There are three choises, I think. 
1) N new chromosomes are generated by three operations: a) Some are directly copied from initial population b) Some are generated by crossover c) Some are generated by mutation (This is the algoritm used in MATLAB's implementation)
2) N old chromosomes enter crossover and after mating and crossover N new chromosomes are generated. There are 2 choises for this case. 
   2.a) N new chromosomes enter mutation.
   2.b) Both N old and N new chromosomes enter mutation.
Which one above (1, 2.a and 2.b) is true? OR Are all of them true? 
Kavas (talk) 08:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: An information is not given in the article

message: local maxima or minima are denote in a mathematics function. The function presented the continuous relation of x-y direction.
Mutation in GA fitnesses  are developed random or variance interval and not in sequence steps. So local maxima or minima of mathematic analysis is not suitable term to describe fitness evolution (will stop).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.170.57.247 (talk) 04:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  local minima 

message: The old article was greatly expanded, since mutations occur not only in genetic algorithms but in almost all other evolutionary algorithms (EA). In this respect, the title is also rather too restrictive. The design of mutation operators depends not only on the EA type but also very much on the representation of the decision variables of the chromosome (genetic representation). Some examples were given and, above all, references were made to the literature. Studi90 (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thorough revision of the old article
Talk:Alliteration

message: Does anyone mind if I set up archiving on this vast, swirling pit of fermenting ordure Talk page, please? Best wishes DBaK (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!—Anita5192 (talk) 05:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving 

message: The end matter has been a mix of different styles for the last three or four years.  Currently there are:
* Harvard style references to full citations (eg "9 ^Beckson & Ganz (1989)" -> "Beckson, Karl; Ganz, Arthur (1989), Literary Terms: A Dictionary (3rd ed.), New York: Noonday Press, LCCN 88-34368")
* Citations in the reference list (eg "28 ^Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. J. R. R. Tolkien, Norman Davis (eds.) (2. ed., 14. impr ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1995. ISBN 978-0-19-811486-4.")
in addition some pages are referenced with:
* 
* some use the  mechanism
* most do nothing.
in short, a bit of a bird's nest.
I propose to be WP:BOLD and give the article a good clean up.  Since there isn't a single style of referencing I intend to pull all the citations into a single list and use short form referencing to them.  To allow for discussion I'll hold off until Monday 21 March. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me.—Anita5192 (talk) 15:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

text: No objection here.   signed, Willondon (talk)  15:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies for not getting on to this earlier as promised.  I'll start work on this forthwith. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 20:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been waiting for  to do something after he removed my editing notice.  Does anyone know if he plans to do something, or shall I continue? Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References, Citations and pages
Talk:Hugh Bigod, 1st Earl of Norfolk

message: It appears that there is a lot misleading content released in the internet concerning the mother of Hugh Bigod's successor - Roger Bigod. He married his two wives only a few years apart. I am concluding his successor was born out of his first marriage due to:
* Most sources, including genealogy information sites point to this conclusion.
* It makes sense that he would name his first born 'Roger' after his father - Roger Bigod, as it was customary at the time. Thus Roger Bigod was born out of his marriage to his first wife - Juliane de Vere (c.1129 - 1199).
--Eestevez 17:45, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Hugh Bigod's Sons

message: Some stories mention a certain visit of Hugh Bigod to the Archbishop in London as the cause for the success of Stephen of Blois over Empress Maud, where he made an oath that the dying king Henry I had left the throne to Stephen of Blois over a quarrel with his daughter. Although I have not found more than one source for such a story, the known quarrel between Stephen and Empress Maud going on for some time before the death of Henry I of England could make this story irrelevant, but it may have been the catalyst for the conflict. 
--Eestevez 22:52, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  During the Reign of King Stephen

message: I do not understand the reasoning in the Final days section. Wasn't March the last month of the year at this time? Did it really take more than eleven months to travel from Palestine to England? I think that the Julian calendar was in use at this time and the distance between England and Palestine is less than 2500 miles so the journey is unlikely to take more than 250 days.  On this basis, Bigod's family could hear of his death in 1177 and act on it by early March. Could someone please clarify this? --Theo  (Talk) 11:16, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: March (or some portion of it) was the first month of the Julian calendar -- March 25 was New Year's Day in the Renaissance and later, but I don't know if that exact date pertained in the 12th century. And I believe three to six months' travel time for a small, armed party between Palestine and England would be about right at this period, depending on the season, and even allowing for travel by ship from the Levant to (say) Marseilles. --Michael K. Smith 17:26, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of death 

message: Hence the words bigot and bigotry.<BR>
I deleted this sentence as folk etymology. The OED says the probable origin of the word "bigot" is Old French and derives from "goth"; it was a sneering term used by the French concerning the Normans. The family apparently adopted it as a "Yankee-Doodle-fication." --Michael K. Smith 17:26, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derivation of name 

message: I believe the accepted date of the sinking of the White Ship is 25 November 1120, not 26 November 1120 as shown here; the cross reference wikipedia White Ship page shows 25 November.
TruGenealogist (talk) 03:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of White Ship Disaster
Talk:Andrew Downes (composer)

message: Important note.
The copyright comments below should be read in the context of Wikipedia:Copyrights. BlueValour 02:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Each of the factual statements, if they are to remain, need to be independently sourced (e.g. from an external website but not yours) - see here. BlueValour 02:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Could you please outline on Talk:Andrew Downes which factual statements in that article you would like citations for? It would be greatly appreciated. - Mark 07:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As an admin you will know far more about sourcing than I do but if the editors want a good example of sourcing they could do worse than seeing Gill Langley. What needs to be done is strip the article down and rewrite it.  A source is need for his Chair (link to college site), the long third para needs to be replaced by a weblink that lists all the commissions (his site is fine for that), then, say, three commissions should be highlighted. I should like to see sourcing for a typical radio or TV play, some evidence of the CDs, sources for the Czech Concerto and Songs of Autumn. If these are provided I should be happy to rewrite the article in a cleaner, crisper fashion. BlueValour 01:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. The person seeking guidance as to what citations are needed will now be able to go off and seek such references. :) - Mark 02:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing
Talk:Radical Women

message: Since the Merle Woo mention already links to the Wikipedia article about her, I thought the extra reference that was supplied (which is available in the Woo article) made the sentence a bit awkward.  It's here if someone feels really strongly about it needing to be there: Merle Woo, Matt & Andrej Koymasky.  - Jlandahl 20:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merle Woo reference 

message: I think this article reads like an op-ed piece in favor of the organization. Whoever wrote it clearly wants everyone to know how great Radical Women is. I am going to be working on cleaning up the severe tone problems when I get time. ⟳ausa کui × 21:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clarifying, Ryan.  If you could be even more specific, I could help fix the article.  Thanks.  Doctormatt 03:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you've not responded, and not made any edits to the article, I removed the tag.  The article seems pretty good to me, tone-wise.  It mostly states what RW states, and it is clear that this is RW's opinion.  There are quite a few citations (for the length of the article).  If you still have things to say about the tone of the article, I'd love to hear them. Doctormatt 21:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:10th millennium

message: what movies and what books and what television series and what video games and what computer games will be in the 10th millennium?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.121.245.99 (talk) 13:42, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  what movies and what books and what television series and what video games and what computer games will be in the 10th millennium?