lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Assyrian Socialist Party

message: On May 1, 2010, User:ܥܝܪܐܩ deleted most of the content of the article, then asked for its speedy deletion. --Pylambert (talk) 10:26, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: http://asp2.no.sapo.pt is not a reliable source.  and  don't appear to be reliable sources either. Read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. I have issued you with a warning for a personal attack on me. You should now provide an explanation of why you think they are reliable sources. In the absence of an explanation I shall remove them and propose deletion. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 10:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Stop your disruptive POV deletions on several Assyrian- or Iraq-related articles or you will be blocked. Since your official arrival on wikipedia (I guess an IP and content analysis would show you "existed" here before under another identity) less than two months ago you have persistenly deleted sourced material and tried to let whole articles be deleted, always following a clearly ideological agenda. Wikipedia is not some propaganda playground for nationalists of all kind. --Pylambert (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ܥܝܪܐܩ, please be aware that you are not allowed to remove the comments of other users from talk pages. You're free to exercise this practice on your own talk page, but you may not do so on the talk page of any other pages without good reason. — ξxplicit 21:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:Government of New Jersey

message: I propose that we remove the "Current officeholder" column of the principle departments table and use the room to expand the Notes column, which should be renamed "Description". The officeholder is just not a piece of information that is so important that it should be given as much prominence as the name of the department and its description. Int21h (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done it. Int21h (talk) 23:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Perhaps the information should be put into the notes column? IDK it just seems like superfluous information for an introductory understanding of the departments' functions. Int21h (talk) 23:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to simplify principle departments table 
Talk:Ripple tank

message: I thought that only a water wave's speed decreased, not its wavelength, as it entered a region where the depth decreases.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.100.86.174 (talk) 17:20, 20 July 2007‎
I don't get it either. If the ripples slow down there will be fewer of them per unit of time, so that the frequency will decrease and its reciprocal the wavelength will increase. Lewis Goudy (talk) 19:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If the number of wavefront peaks per unit time is unchanged, when they reach a region where the velocity is slower, they must "pile up" and crowd into a smaller space, hence shorter wavelength. Think of cars on a freeway encountering a patch where they must slow down; the spacing between cars must decrease.  The number of cars arriving per unit time at a given point can't suddenly change, unless they just vanish by unspecified "magic". Reify-tech (talk) 06:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Remark regarding depth changes

message: The 2005 version of this article was more comprehensive than the current article; it included more diagrams and explanations. Maybe that content could be restored? 67.198.37.16 (talk) 19:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing diagrams
Talk:Nassau Hall

message: There should be a section on the etymology of Nassau.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.12.14.27 (talk) 14:05, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:Pinus flexilis

message: Though there does not appear to be complete agreement on the relationships among P. flexilis James, P. strobiformis Engelmann, and P. strobus L., the USDA (and all other credible sources found using internet searches, except wiki) identify the common name Southwestern White Pine as P. strobiformis, not P. flexilis.  It's also disturbing that the wiki page for P. strobiformis does not identify the common English name as Southwestern White Pine but as the Chihuahua white pine, in contradiction to the USDA and all credible internet sources.  
ChuckBiggs2 (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to remove incorrect common name southwestern white pine 

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Limber.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 

message: While reading the article on limber pines, I noticed that the photo of limber pine male cones is really a picture of whitebark pine male cones.  Limber pine male cones are yellow and whitebark pine male cones are reddish pink, as this photo shows.  As whitebark pines and limber pines are very similar, these distinguishing characteristics can be used to identify the two species.  I doubt the species vary by geographic distribution; however, I could be wrong.  I have noticed limber pine cones in central Idaho and Wyoming are yellow and whitebark pine male cones are reddish pink.  I have not figured out how to upload a picture of the limber pine male pollen cones onto this discussion site, sorry. --Aserrian (talk) 15:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of limber pine (Pinus flexilis) male cones is probably a photo of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) male cones 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support move to scientific name. See above. Famartin (talk) 04:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Quote "White Mountains of Northern California", the link is for a mountain range in central Eastern California not in Northern California. אביהו (talk) 08:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Mountains
Talk:Smiths

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
#Support as nominator, plus: Smiths Group is a major industrial concern, as is Smiths Aerospace, and the other usages are notable as well. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 22:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support as nominator, plus: Smiths Group is a major industrial concern, as is Smiths Aerospace, and the other usages are notable as well. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 22:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes
Talk:Dawes Cycles

message: "High quality hand built"? I thought Dawes was known for making relatively cheap, mass-produced bikes. I think their highest end racing bike uses Tiagra components and oddly enough, their touring bikes offer 105 components.
:The reputation is reasonable - certainly in touring circles.  It would help to have a reference. The Parson's Cat (talk) 14:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

message: As far as I can tell, everything here is true ... but Wikipedia needs to have references to reliable sources.  The article only has two references, and these are so incomplete that it would be very hard for a reader to identify the original source.
The Parson's Cat (talk) 14:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a few references 

message: Between 1978 and 2001 the company was sold at least five times, passing through the hands of various venture capital and leisure companies. Resultantly, by the mid-1980s, the firm had 50 staff at its dilapidated Tysley factory.
The five sales ending in 2001 cannot have produced a result of any sort as early as the mid-1980s. 109.145.108.156 (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clumsy 
Talk:A Christmas Carol (2006 film)

message: The official website says that the name is "A Christmas Carol: Scrooge's Ghostly Tale".  Should this page be moved? Esn 22:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?

message: Both the DVD and several sites say this movie came out in 2004.  (The DVD itself is what's copyright 2006.)  However, that would change quite a few things on this page, including the name.  Should I go in and make all of those changes?
--Bobsmith84 17:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date?
Talk:Gabagool!

message: related to Gabagool? --User123o987name (talk) 22:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this 

message: It seems an autobiographical text, without proper references, especially the part of ‘history’ 94.209.181.26 (talk) 19:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of view
Talk:Cubic inch

message: Just curious, can you cite a style guideline on ? I thought there was something in the MOS that actually encourages editors to use Unicode characters, when available. Thank you! — voidxor 20:53, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Superscript markup is preferred: see  and  - the 'Powers' section of the table of guidelines. Indefatigable (talk) 21:03, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unicode versus superscript tag
Talk:Kaba

message: There is currently not a Wiktionary entry wikt:kaba.  I've removed to here the following passage from the 20 December 2006 version of the dab page, which should go into a Wiktionary entry: "It is also an informal name for chocolate milk in Germany." --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary
Talk:Manning–Rivers trade

message: Rivers has a higher career QB Rating than Manning [7][8], But one should also take note that Eli Manning has played 23 games more than Phillip Rivers, Hereby reducing his rating by the laws of averages.
What utter crap!  Who's trying to be an Eli apologist?  If he had played better in those 23 games we wouldn't need to read this pathetic excuse.  If you put "played on an inferior team" or "behind an inferior OL" we might be able to talk but what is written is mathematically incorrect unless you are trying to argue that Eli is inherently an average QB who will regress to an average QB rating, which I don't think you are.  I'm changing this to something a little less weasly Megamanic 09:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality Part 2

message: I have removed much of the text of the article since it was full of biased and speculative analysis, weasel words and irrelevant analysis about players not involved in the trade. I would urge editors to read Wikipedia's core policy on maintaining a neutral point of view. Thanks, Gwernol 09:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work.  I wasn't "BOLD" enough to just delete the section where the relative merits of other players are debated but that's the right approach.Megamanic 03:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major article surgery 

message: I don't understand why this needs an article, it really isn't notable at all. something could be mentioned on Eli's page or the Chargers main page but I definitely does not deserve its own article Gailim 06:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 100% agree.  Especially with the consistent neutrality issues.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by President David Palmer (talk • contribs) 09:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion? 

message: Shouldn't this article just be called the 'Eli Manning trade' as he was the focal point of the entire trade? No one ever says the Rivers-Manning as Merriman is seen as the best of the platers received. I am going to request a move if no one disputes this. --Endless Dan 15:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: I suggest this page be merged with the 2004 NFL Draft because this article really just says about a minor trade between two teams. This information can easily be put into the 04 draft no?--TrUCo9311 02:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree.►Chris NelsonHolla! 23:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

text: agree RC-0722 (talk) 15:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree --71.62.4.205 (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree Teams trade players and draft picks all the time. What makes this one so special?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.34.205.161 (talk) 20:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Cronian

message: Is the band even active anymore? Their website ... is obviously not theirs, at least not anymore. I mean, I'm fairly sure Oystein and Vintersorg are recording for the next Borknagar album, but did they trash this project? Doesn't seem likely to me. 75.86.235.174 (talk) 03:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems this question has already solved itself. But I had originally come here to point out the quote from Pliny found at Pytheas. Obviously this is where the band name was taken from. In view of the fact that Pytheas' voyage is the first (or in fact, only) recorded expedition of anyone from ancient Mediterranean civilisation into the Arctic, presumably near the coast of Northern Norway, the Cronian Sea - provided this interpretation is correct - would be a quite fitting eponym. Florian Blaschke (talk) 01:11, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance?
Talk:Syllabub

message: "Some contemporary cooks use Tequila, but  older recipes often made use of champagne or rum. "
I can find no sources for these statements.  Michael Fourman 23:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced claims 

message: It seems to me that if you remove the recipes from the articles there's very little left, so it either needs more info or to be moved. Trcunning 08:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the article should remain. In fact, I've seen it make a slight revival recently - you see it in a few restaurants around London and I've randomly seen it mentioned twice in the last week on British TV (for instance). Bandanamerchant (talk) 22:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to WikiCookbook 

message: The picture on this page 'Syllabub.jpg' is not of a syllabub, but of a similar confection containing cheese. I've removed it pending finding a more accurate one. Glynhughes (talk) 09:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Picture
Talk:Vijayanagara literature

message: I searched in books and internet and regrouped literature and also added two more sections called "arts and sciences" and "history". Some things are still left in misc section, as those authors have written both history and mythology and some are not known which catagory they fall into. mlpkr 23:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sankskrit literature 
Talk:Spiegelman's Monster

message: It's not really "self-replicating" if it's a virus, is it?  After all, viruses by definition aren't self-replicating because they need a cell to make more copies of themselves.  Citizen Premier 23:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: my bad.  It's actually replicating in a solution of salts and nucleotides.  I'll try to make that clearer in the article.  Citizen Premier 23:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: when did spiegelman accomplished this?
given the first reference, it must have been in 1972 -- M1ck1 14:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  when? 

message: I just came across this fascinating experiment in The Ancestor's Tale in which Dawkins describes how it had been 3600 nucleotides long originally and reduced after 74 generations (as in the article) to 550; two out of the three numbers are thuss different here. Which is right?
Dicaeopolis 02:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can follow the cited papers link to pubmed and retrieve his original paper (its free access), which states the 218 number Codec 21:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, those aren't generations; those are iterations of the take-a-sample, put-it-in-a-new-tube process; between each new tube, there were a lot of generations. grendel|khan 21:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Ancestor's Tale 

message: Paul Davies claimed:
:Incredible though Spiegelman's results were, an even bigger surprise lay in store. In 1974, Manfred Eigen and his colleagues also experimented with a chemical broth containing Qb replication enzyme and salts, and an energized form of the four bases that make up the building blocks of RNA. They tried varying the quantity of viral RNA initially added to the mixture. As the amount of input RNA was progressively reduced, the experimenters found that, with little competition, it enjoyed untrammeled exponential growth. Even a single RNA molecule added to the broth was enough to trigger a population explosion. But then something truly amazing was discovered. Replicating strands of RNA were still produced even when not a single molecule of viral RNA was added!
I notice that we don't mention this; were these claims unrepeatable? They seem pretty out-there. grendel|khan 21:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is mentioned in the current version. Cesiumfrog (talk) 00:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spontanous generation?
Talk:Eric Sherbrooke Walker

message: As I said on the talk page in 2016, notability is not inherited. That various notable people may have stayed at this place does not really count for much in the context of it having a standalone article. I think it would probably be better merged with the Walker biographical article, although in practice that would probably just mean redirecting because the proposed target already has the information. Sitush (talk) 14:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Outspan Hotel]]
Talk:State Street Bridge (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania)

message: Could someone please corroborate this?  The years are:
:1756:  French and Indian War
:1763:  Pontiac’s Rebellion
:1775:  American Revolution
:1812:  War of 1812
:1846:  Mexican War
:1861:  Civil War
:1898:  Spanish War
:1917:  The Great War
These were the wars that Pennsylvania had sent troops.
Is my years/wars/reasons correct? Solri89 (talk) 13:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on photographs the years are 1754, 1763, 1776, 1812, 1846, 1861, 1898, and 1917. But you do have the conflicts correct. Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 18:42, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The years etched on the pylons
Talk:Humshaugh

message: How is this different from Brownsea Island?Rlevse 23:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. It was the 2nd camp. My mistake. ray 15:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brownsea

message: Rlevse, I'll go with your assessment as a High Importance article for now - but I ask that you consider that where Brownsea was the start, Humshaugh seems to be just as important in shaping how Scouting would be undertaken for the next 100 years around the world. Horus Kol 11:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance Rating 

message: This article should be about the village/parish of Humshaugh. It seems to have been overwhelmed by the scout camp (a valid article in its own right). Can I propose that the article be split? Probably move Humshaugh to Humshaugh Scout Camp, and then I will recreate Humshaugh as a settlement article. I won't do anything without consent. Twiceuponatime (talk) 09:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to split this article 
Talk:Richard Wurmbrand

message: "Due to political pressure, he was given amnesty and released in 1964"
While I am not familiar with the details of Wurmbrands release from prison, in 1964 virtually *all* political prisoners in Romania were released in a general amnesty. Someone more knoledgeable on the subject might want to correct me - or the article.merryXIV 23:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase was in the text when I gave it a combover. I cannot tell you if it is true (ie: if political pressure played a part in his release), and, although what you say is very reasonable, I couldn't tell you if he was released because all the others were released. For now, I'll just change it to "he was released", pending verification. Dahn 04:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prisons 

message: Given that nobody challenged it in detail since 2011 here, and as I find the article relatively unapologetic, I removed the tags.
Zezen (talk) 18:18, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality tag removed
Talk:Yamaha SR400 & SR500

message: Another classic about which more should be said. Respectfully, SamBlob 23:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This is written more like a fansite than an encyclopedic entry. Marshall Stax (talk) 10:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

message: Here it is 2013 and the article still suffers hugely from a personal tone, heavily biased in favor of the subject of the article, with headings that make it sound like an article for a Popular Mechanics issue of 1967.  I have begun and will continue to rigorously trimming of the article in the coming weeks. 842U (talk) 09:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Template talk:Universal Press Syndicate

message: Is this template really necessary?  Why isn't a category enough?--SidP 23:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Could the font be set to a normal size? 75.62.7.22 08:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought I agree with those who suggest using a category instead.  This template is too big even if the fonts are fixed. 75.62.7.22 08:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ugly template 

message: I've nominated this template for deletion: Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Universal_Press_Syndicate 75.62.7.22 06:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominated for deletion
Talk:Prompt gamma neutron activation analysis

message: Note: this article is based on a web page written by NIST employees, hosted on a NIST server: http://www.ncnr.nist.gov/instruments/pgaa/ , which, as a work of the U.S federal government, is in the public domain. -- The Anome 23:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I am removing the suggested merge to neutron activation. There has been no discussion about this for a while (ever?) and I think they are pretty clearly separate articles. That article is about the physical process, this article is about an application of the phenomenon. A suggested merge into neutron activation analysis might be more appropriate, but still debatable. -Cwenger (talk) 18:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing suggested merge