Talk:St. Patrick High School (Chicago)

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: The current set up lists top-4 finishes for the school in IHSA State Series.  For sports (like water polo) that had state titles prior to the IHSA sponsoring a state championship, this must be listed separately, and must have a proper reliable source supporting it, per wikipedia's verifiability policy.  Best of luck and happy editing! LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Water Polo State Titles

message: Before adding or re-adding any people to this list. Please consult:
* The Wikischools Project policies on alumni in school articles
* The Wikischool Project policies on what not to include in school articles
* The general notability guidelines for Wikipedia
In short:  alumni should not be listed unless they meet Wikipedia's notability guideline.  That is, they are the subject of an article, or are eligible for an article.  Note:  local business people generally are not notable.  Further, these alumni should not be listed unless there is a third part reliable source that confirms they attended the school. LonelyBeacon (talk) 22:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni

message: An anon editor has been repeatedly adding an alum to the list of notable alumni.  The individual alum is not only a red link, but pretty clearly does not meet WP:GNG.  Per the Schools Project Guideline on alumni, alumni should only be listed if they meet the general notability guideline.  This guideline is an extension of the guidelines on lists of people which states that lists of people should generally be restricted to people who meet the notability requirement.
Further, all alumni require a reliable source to confirm that they not only exist, but were in fact alumni.  No such reference has ever been offered.  What has been offered is a link to a business website that does not even mention the alum in question, let alone that they attended the school.  As far as I am concerned, this reeks of WP:NOT#ADVERTISING.
I would like any editor to comment on this issue below, whether in support of or against inclusion of this alum. LonelyBeacon (talk) 22:41, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments on addition of non-notable alumni

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on St. Patrick High School (Chicago). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090429033455/http://www.advanc-ed.org:80/schools_districts/school_district_listings/? to http://www.advanc-ed.org/schools_districts/school_district_listings/?
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071006121912/http://www.stpatrick.org/about/welcome/history.htm to http://www.stpatrick.org/about/welcome/history.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080920115520/http://www.stpatrick.org:80/athletics/cheer/cheerleaders.htm to http://www.stpatrick.org/athletics/cheer/cheerleaders.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on St. Patrick High School (Chicago). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090717234224/http://www.stpatrick.org:80/about/drugfree.htm to http://www.stpatrick.org/about/drugfree.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080514205822/http://www.stpatrick.org/athletics/ibhp.htm to http://www.stpatrick.org/athletics/ibhp.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081011115314/http://www.americansuperstarmag.com/tv_film/May08/Jacob_Zachar.php to http://www.americansuperstarmag.com/tv_film/May08/Jacob_Zachar.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Here are the issues I have with TheDonsAreTrash recent edits.
1. Claims stating the school is the oldest...are sourced to the school which is not a Reliable Source
2. The third paragraph under history is entirely unsourced.
3. How promotional can we get with "academics at St. Patrick are very diverse and strong" this is Peacock and promotional. The rest of that paragraph and the next are more suitable for the school's website and look at that it is sourced to the schools website.
4. "Program for Advanced College Credit" section is completely promotional and is more suitable for the school's website, and again look at what it is referenced to.
5. "Drug Testing Program" again wikipedia is not a webhost, and again this is referenced to the schools website.
6. "Known through Chicago and Illinois as an iconic"...how much more peacock can you get.
7. It was "shocking win" - not encylopedic
8. "Prestigious" is most often a peacock
9. The rest of the sports section the way the it is in this edit is not encylopedic, this includes the soccer section which is also unsourced. 
10. The addition of to "Notable" alumni who are not notable according to Wikipedia guidelines. I have suggested the editor write the articles first and submit to determine if these individuals are notable enough to be included in Wikipedia.
This article should be reverted back to the best historical version that is not promotional. Thank you --VVikingTalkEdits 13:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with recent additions