Talk:Sarah Connor (singer)

message: hasta la vista song lol.she actually did sing it for one of her albums a reference to terminator films   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.73.100.55 (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: when does she hit whistle register
She hits G6 in "Summertime" - A Night to Remember  —Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 81.210.165.38 (talk) 22:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  whistle register 

message: I think the comments about her genre is clunky.  Maybe rewrite it?  I tried but I couldnt think of the proper way.  Also she is one of the best selling German female artists of all time...I dont see why that should be removed.  And on the note of genres (a big reason its clunky) though she changes the style with various albums she always seems to have a mix of pop, hip pop (hip hop mixed with pop), and blue eyed soul; though in recent years she kinda didnt do as much hip pop.  I dont know lets discuss it here and then we can rework it.  --Thegingerone 22:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro writting

message: Dear Thegingerone, in this edit you stated that "all the articles" said that the "Impossible Dream" is by Diana Ross. What articles do you mean by that? The Diana Ross & the Supremes Join the Temptations actually says that the song is taken from Man of La Mancha, and the La Mancha article itself states that the whole thing is by Joe Darion and Mitch Leigh. The Diana Ross, Diana Ross & the Supremes, and The Temptations articles don't seem to mention the song at all. Anyway, I've got no other sources either, I just remember seeing the musical on TV, but I can at least offer the IBDB link from the La Mancha link list (where the Impossible Dream is in the song list). --H.A.L. 09:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Impossible Dream' origin 

message: Currently the article quotes her surname at birth as both 'Lewe' and Leve'.  Which is correct ?
Derek R Bullamore 21:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Her birth name is Sarah Lewe. La Lovely 17:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name 

message: :Image:Tid 02.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Tid 02.jpg

message: :Image:Let's Get Back to Bed - Boy (screenshot).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 14:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Let's Get Back to Bed - Boy (screenshot).jpg

message: :Image:Summertattoo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Summertattoo.jpg

message: :Image:Living to Love You (screenshot).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Living to Love You (screenshot).jpg

message: :Image:One Nite Stand (screenshot).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:One Nite Stand (screenshot).jpg

message: :Image:Summertattoo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Summertattoo.jpg

message: :Image:Vanityfair07 01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Vanityfair07 01.jpg

message: It's unsourced, it's full of irrelevant gossip and written in a very bad English. And when a user adds a tag please remove it only when the tag's requirements are fulfilled. --Fromgermany (talk) 23:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree as it was already pretty well referenced.  But I went back through and cleaned it up, and referenced a few more things.  Should be good now! As for "irrelavant gossip" Im not sure what your referring but cutting out any major media things with her is not right.  Her dress controversy, and anthem incident were both major media events when they occured.  Not sure what other gossip there may be.  I tried my best to keep it all relevant; and its funny you don't like my English since its the only language that I do speak!  Well, hopefully, its all satisfiable now...I don't want an edit war. --Thegingerone (talk) 06:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do not speculate. Refrain from adding your own point of view. Do not use Hyperboles. Keep to a strict encyclopedic style. --Fromgermany (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My own point of view really isn't in there.  She was heavily pregnant and has said this is why she didn't promote "Bounce".  However I don't speak German so no I don't have all the articles on me.  The story about Wyclef and Marc have been said in several interviews and I did source one part (the no gf/Lou rule).  Even if you disagree with those edits why do you keep adding the unreferenced tag?  All you do is say its a "shame" and "unencyclopediac" though you don't cite and you removed cited sources (and I mean REAL sources not just cheap gossip sites or something like that). --Thegingerone (talk) 21:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever wrote all of the above also does not fully understand English, either (which I corrected), because words like {don't, isn't, didn't} always contain an apostrophe, because they are contractions in the English language. For example, "don't" is a contraction of "do not", and the apostrophe is an essential part of it. I mention this specifically because such laziness or ignorance is cropping up more and more.Also, in the English language, the first use of quotation marks is done with this: " , and then the single mark: ' , is used for quotations nested within quotations. I see that problem in more and more British publications - but, neverless, the American way is the superior and clearer one.98.67.164.99 (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  the article is a shame! 

message: I have no problem with changing "Sarah" to "Connor" but you remove valid cited info in the process.  Either EDIT the damn thing, or quit revering good edits.  Your just being childish and name calling its getting old. --Thegingerone (talk) 12:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Typically I am on the fence in these disputes that are referred to a third party, but I find myself firmly entrenched in Fromgermany's camp. The recent edits make the article sound like a fan site. "A few weeks before her son was born" - is this relevant? Is the fact that we track her pregnancy through her career encyclopedic? I am unable to check my skepticism of the one reference to this entire paragraph: the link is either broken, or you need to be a member, and the reference states, "Sarah Connor chat history", which doesn't really give me a good verifiability feeling. Bottom line - article needs massive evisceration of fancraft material. Tanthalas39 (talk) 04:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Anything that comes from "rumor" or "gossip" absolutely, positively DO NOT belong in any encyclopedia. (Perhaps they belong in fansites.) I personally am amazed that people will actually write stuff in the Wikipedia and openly state that it is "rumor". That one word should flash like a neon sign, "This does not belong here."98.67.164.99 (talk) 19:27, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit War

message: Hey. I saw this page listed on WP:3O, so here's my take. I'm actually okay with Fromgermany's edits on the page. Adding interjections like "Again with little notice" are unencyclopedic and skew this page towards being WP:FANCRUFT. Furthermore, I think the Personal Life section needs some heavy trimming. There's a great deal of unsourced statements, such as "Terenzi refused to end the relationship and once Connor was pregnant rumors had it that Pearlman gave the ultimatum: replace Marc or end the band" and "X-Cell wanted to use it as a publicty(sic) stunt, though Connor met Marc Terenzi shortly after and the relationship ended." This page should not list every single relationship she's had; rather, it can be trimmed down to say "In the past, Connor has dated x, y, z." Something like that. I just tagged this page as needing better references, and for a change in tone. Until these issues are resolved, do not remove those tags. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anything that comes from "rumor" or "gossip" absolutely, positively DO NOT belong in any encyclopedia. (Perhaps they belong in fansites.) I personally am amazed that people will actually write stuff in the Wikipedia and openly state that it is "rumor". That one word should flash like a neon sign, "This does not belong here."98.67.164.99 (talk) 19:27, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion

message: There are a few issues with this article's tone. The constant references to her states of pregnancy in relation to work aren't encyclopedic, and are unreferenced. Is she the only person who ever worked while she was pregnant or after giving birth? This is irrelevant. I'd also like to see confirmation that the release of recordings is under her control, since the article makes it sound as if she dictates to the recording company when this will occur. There are two full sections discussing the recording releases and facts surrounding those that are completely unreferenced. None of the material  related to her husband's band issues or the mention of rumors with no citations is appropriate. The tags that were added to this article are appropriate and need to be addressed, not simply removed. It reads in parts like a fanzine. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm fair enough.  I'll have to clean it up when I get a moment.  The hardest part is MOST of her sources in German; a German speaker is needed here. --Thegingerone (talk) 08:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues

message: Mirotic (the Korean album, not the Japanese version) mentions that Sarah Connor and TVXQ (DBSK in Korea and Tōhōshinki in Japan) bought the rights to the song written by Remee, Lucas Secon and Thomas Troelsen, but neither Under My Skin (Sarah Connor song) nor Jumon: Mirotic (the Japanese version) mention it. Can anybody verify this? moocowsruletalk to moo 07:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Under My Skin (Sarah Connor song)]] vs. [[Jumon: Mirotic]] and [[Mirotic]]? 

message: The phrase "third digital-only single" is meaningless and contradictory. ALL music that is recorded on compact disks is recorded in a digital format.Also, most cassette tapes are recorded in a completely analog format.Also, all music is fundamentally an analog form of communication. A song comes out of a singer's mouth in analog form, and it goes into the listener's ears in analog form, and if it was recorded on a compact disk, it was stored as a digital approximation of the analog form.This "digital-only single" business was doubtless written by someone who knows nothing about electronics technology, etc. This comment was written by a man with a master's degeee in electrical & electronic engineering, and with a specialty in analog and digital communications.98.67.164.99 (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital Only ?? 

message: I was wondering if there was any connection to the Terminator (franchise), did she take her name from it, was there any legal action? And then I read her personal life...
On February 29, 2004 the couple invited their friends to a dinner supposedly to celebrate the birth of their son, John Connor, future leader of the Skynet resistance. However they announced that they in fact had eloped. The couple renewed their vows this time with a big family wedding on August 18, 2005 in Altafulla, Tarragonès, near Barcelona in Spain. The wedding was the subject of their reality show Sarah and Marc in Love, which was crazy because Skynet would easily be able to monitor her whereabouts while on television. Which I found very amusing, I will delete it, but I wonder if this happens a lot. Tydamann (talk) 09:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminator

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Sarah Connor (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.deldorado.borgmeier-media.de/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=33
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sarah Connor (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110107185321/http://www.sarah-connor.com/de/media/discography/album/soulicious.html to http://www.sarah-connor.com/de/media/discography/album/soulicious.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928141156/http://www.sarahconnor.org/discography/ to http://www.sarahconnor.org/discography/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It says she is in the cast of Terminator, at 4 yrs old.😂 82.21.115.77 (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're confusing her with Sarah Connor (Terminator) ----FMSky (talk) 08:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  wiki error