lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pylorus

message: It has no theology, or geometry ==
I vote this be moved to pyloric sphincter -> nobody calls it a valve. (I read some where not to be hasty in moves)
Valves are what you have in your heart. your mouth, ass and pylorus are sphincters.--ZZ 03:16, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: from edit summary: the content of Pyloric antrum and Pylorus are much overlapping but not redundant; Pyloric antrum speaks to an anatomical substructure. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger suggestion [[Pyloric antrum]] => [[Pylorus]] 

message: Hello to all! I am proposing a merge from the following articles into this article:
* Pyloric canal
* Pyloric antrum
This is for the following reasons:
* I plan to significantly expand the article on pylorus in the future and feel that it would be better to have the canal and antrum covered in this section under a 'structure' subheading. This would allow comparison between blood supplies, venous drainage, lymphatic and nervous supply.
* The main article would benefit significantly from having all this information in one place.
* It would improve the anatomical content to have this all in one place.
* The increased readership would hopefully impact on article quality in the future.
Kind Regards, LT910001 (talk) 01:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: with no objections, this merged has been performed. --LT910001 (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: Needless fragmentation; would be better presented under pylorus/histology. Would enhance information to have it displayed in context. LT910001 (talk) 01:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: with no objections, this merge has been performed. --LT910001 (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Pyloric glands]] 

message: Student of anatomy, first time commenting: I'm looking for info on the pyloric antrum, and the description here seems to be at odds with the illustrations, or at the least unclear. Please edit for greater clarity:
From the article:  "Pyloric antrum (lesser cul-de-sac) is the initial portion of the pyloric part of the stomach."  
The illustrations show two portions at the lower end of the stomach, with the second one labeled antrum.  The description seems to say the opposite, that the antrum is the first part.  I can't clarify this but other sites show mixed information.  see: medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/antrum
Jimmer57 (talk) 13:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comments, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Please feel free at any time during your studies to point our errors or inconsistencies like this, or, even better, find a reliable source like a textbook and make the change yourself! I'm one of the editors at WP:ANATOMY and we're already looking to collaborate with other editors to improve the encyclopedia. Cheers, --LT910001 (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion About [[Pyloric Antrum]] 

message: Have introduced gastric antrum into Antrum section - it is far more usual than pyloric - nGrams and Google hits.--Iztwoz (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of gastric antrum
Category talk:United States Navy admirals

message: How come there is nothing on Admiral John Henry Towers, the father of Naval Aviation by many?
: Added. You're welcome. Jinian 20:31, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: How come

message: Why was this category changed from "U.S. Navy admirals"? It would seem to increase clutter in the (sometimes long) list of categories over an article, without really adding anything, since the article itself ought to have "United States Navy"—spelled out and linked—pretty early on.
—wwoods 00:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I too am somewhat confused by this change.  If it in order to conform with some standards, I suppose that is fine by me, however there exists a few more categories related to this one that have not been modified.  For example :Category:U.S. Navy officers, and :Category:U.S._Army_officers among others.  I think we need to hammer out this U.S. vs. United States thing, and come to some sort of consensus.  -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 18:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. vs. United States? 

message: Forrest Sherman is missing, although there is a wikipedia page for him Buzdavis 01:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forrest Sherman 

message: I found some information on an Admiral that's not listed here:
Pacific War Online Encyclopedia
--Arima (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfred Eugene Montgomery
Talk:Belisario Corenzio

message: "...and the large wall paintings which still cover the cupola of the church of Monte Cassino are evidence of uncommon facility..."
I assume those wall paintings were destroyed with the rest of the building in 1944? Adam Bishop 04:45, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Very little, if anything, survived the bombing of Monte Cassino, certainly not the cupola.  I think it's safe to say they're gone. Antandrus 04:47, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Matt Cameron

message: My source for the paragraph which begins: "Cameron was born in San Diego..." and the paragraph which begins: "Despite a career in rock music..." is this interview CD: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0000011SC/qid=1095484416/sr=1-15/ref=sr_1_15/104-3326182-0356701?v=glance&s=music
My source for the paragraph which begins "In 1978..." is the book New Metal Crown () by Chris Nickson --Cormac Canales 05:16, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does the Smashing Pumpkins info really belong in the opening paragraph when he only actually featured on one album track, while he drummed on four tracks on Eleven's Thunk? I think Soundgarden and Pearl Jam should get top billing as they are the bands he is most famous for - everything else covered further down.
Also was he really the "primary back-up vocalist" for Soundgarden? Was that not Ben Shepherd?
Beve 07:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening paragraph

message: The article currently says "Cameron was a member of supergroup Temple of the Dog".  The supergroup page defines a supergroup as "a music group whose members are already successful as solo artists or as part of other groups or well known in other musical professions" (which seems sensible).
Soundgarden had only limited success at that time with Louder Than Love.  Pearl Jam had yet released any albums when the Temple of the Dog album was released.  As such, I don't agree that Temple of the Dog is a supergroup.  In contrast, the related group Audioslave can legitimately be considered a supergroup.
I have removed the supergroup description.  If there are reasons to put it back, please discuss here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wantnot (talk • contribs) 09:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Temple of the Dog a supergroup? 

message: I’m wondering, could the infobox photo be changed and put into another section of the page? There is a photo of Matt in 2018 later in the page but the bad part is that it doesn’t really show his face as well. I just want more recent pictures in the infobox that is all. BoltznNutz (talk) 23:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox photo change
Talk:Chapter

message: Several of the meanings of "chapter" have a further division called subchapters. The page on the book sense does not mention them and there is no separate article. Probably other senses would benefit from mentioning this term and it's meaning also. — Hippietrail 18:08, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subchapters 

message: The organisational division sense should possibly be merged with the religious one (and that should then be renamed)
-- TimNelson 10:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisational division?
Talk:Halfling

message: "The word 'Halfling' was also from a line in a Shakespeare play, referring to a midget, a boy sized man. " Mmm, I doubt this enough to move it here till someone with a Concordance to Shakespeare can verify or deny. I suspected it because if it were really in Shakespeare, it would be in the Shorter O.E.D. eh. (The line was contributed anonymously by IC 66.42.112.41. Wetman 06:30, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Made one. Let's hope it does good. --Ifrit 04:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm puzzled why the article says it's another word for hobbit, as I don't remember the term halfling appearing anywhere in either The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings.  FeralDruid 09:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I did some checking and Boromir uses the term three times during the Council of Elrond.  FeralDruid 02:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Appendix F, they called themselves Hobbits, but Men called them halflings. Daibhid C (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tolkien

message: There's absolutely no connection between Hanner Dyn the Half-Man and halflings that I can see. And where does "halflings were thought to be 4'9"-5'0" come from? Thought by whom, when? Daibhid C (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Folklore
Talk:Tintin

message: I think because the term Tintin doesn't always mean the adventures of tintin, it should point to a disambiguation page.F3-R4 22:11, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps so, but a redirect that existed for over two years and that was used by more than 200 pages shouldn't per haps be changed overnight. I was actually going through all the pages that linked to Tintin and changing all the links to the correct pages (usually either The Adventures of Tintin, Tintin and Snowy, or Tintin (magazine)). The article Tintin and Snowy isn't even linked from the diambig page! (I'll fix that in a moment though). Once all links to Tintin are removed (from articles; I don't care about user pages, talk pages, ...), this discussion becomes moot of course, but I think that in general, you could perhaps have discussed this a bit more before implementing this change. No real harm done of course! Fram 13:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection of this page

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Danski454 (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Tintin →  – Tintin (character) is the primary topic IMO. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 December 2021
Talk:Savi Technology

message: from VfD:
Blatent advert. TPK 10:13, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Marked for Cleanup, need references and re-write. Proper inline citations need to be included for validation of presented facts. The article also contains content that is very promotional. An example is the RFID Industry Standards section. --TRL (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need More References, Article Re-Write 

message: FYI, if this in relevant to anyone who might want to update the page:  Savi filed for bankruptcy and restructured in 2021.  (See (current) results from https://www.google.com/search?q=savi+technology+bankruptcy+restructure.) Dsb765 (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI: Bankruptcy, restructuring in 2021
Talk:De Bilt

message: Another article for Bilthoven or not, like now? Belgian man 10:34, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I prefer to have Bilthoven redirect here, unless the Bilthoven section gets too large. On Wikipedia: WikiProject Dutch municipalities I've proposed the guideline that the information about individual towns is put in the artivle about the muncipality. Eugene van der Pijll 12:17, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: The actual village of De Bilt (within the municipality of De Bilt) is much smaller than Bilthoven. However the impression given by this article is that the village contains 42,000 inhabitants. I live in De Bilt and you can cycle around the entire area contained by the roads on its outskirts, within about 45 mins to an hour. Bilthoven is referred to as a 'village', but it has the size and character of a town. 
As it stands the description of De Bilt/Bilthoven here is completely the wrong way around.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.130.113.142 (talk) 11:12, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bilthoven/De Bilt
Talk:Neil M. Gunn

message: I take it this article will actually get finished at some point?
BScotland
Concur. What about some more pictures? A photograph of the Blue Plaque in Inverness perhaps?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.111.89 (talk) 22:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sniggle

message: This appears to be a neologism, a made-up word that is not in general usage (and an obscure word for eel fishing which is also not in general usage).  A quick Google for the word returns usages, in the "culture jamming / prankster" sense, ONLY pages on sniggle.net and Wikipedia and its clones.  I don't think that a word made up by the people that run a web site and not used elsewhere justifies a Wikipedia article, and I vote to delete it, as well as remove the word from all the pages that link to this, since it is not a word understood by the general English-speaking population. It clearly survived VfD once before in November 2003; since it is functionally impossible to look back in the VfD history that far, I have no idea why.  It was removed from VfD after four days, suggesting that a complete vote was not taken. —Morven 10:41, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete. The eel meaning appears to be legitimate. Transwiki that to wiktionary. —Rory ☺ 11:41, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
*I would say keep, since it only links to culture jamming (we need to check that article to make sure that snigle.com hasn't been added to it inappropriately).  However, because "sniggle" is a sort of proprietary slang term, this amounts to advertising stuck on top of a dict def, so delete. Geogre 12:55, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: * This article is not going to be deleted because I, for one, am watching over it now.  Please feel free to expand the article further. Warden (talk) 19:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Live album

message: I question whether Let It Be, a “live in the studio” album should be on the list. Sure, it was impromptu but it was also recorded in the studio and heavily overdubbed afterwards. Even if it could technically be called a live album I would prefer, for simplicity’s sake, that only tradition live albums be listed.
- User:Rorschach567
:It seems to me like a separate section on "live in the studio" albums would be appropriate. Phil Sandifer 22:46, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: ^^ MarthsBullet (talk) 04:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The entire "How To" section needs to be rewritten and renamed

message: Declaring live albums blanket "notable" is POV - I'd like some justification or rephrasing there. Phil Sandifer 22:49, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable albums

message: Is this topic intended to cover only officially released live records or would it include bootlegs?  A section commenting on the relation between the two would be useful. Pimlottc 00:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  live album vs bootleg 

message: * Yes but we can have a Untitled in a live album ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xaviourte1992 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Talks

message: Kraftwerk has a Live album called Minimum Maximum in 2005. It is recorded during the 2004 wotld tour.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.47.140.30 (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kraftwerk
Talk:Eyemouth

message: Things to do in Eyemouth
 Walk around the braes to Coldingham
Get fish and chips from Giacopazzi's
Have a round of Golf
Walk along the bantry 
Visit the museum — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.137.25.46 (talk) 12:34, 18 September 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I would argue that none of the "Other places of interest" are nearby and have no connection with Eyemouth, and have/should have pages of their own. I feel the page needs tidying because it reads like a tourist or property developers' brochure. David Lauder 13:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Places of interest

message: Eyemouth disaster of 1881 should be included. 81.99.69.49 (talk) 08:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a paragraph under the History section about the disaster and it links to the Eyemouth Disaster page. Farefeerfalling (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eyemouth disaster of 1881 is not mentioned. 

message: History of smuggling in and around Eyemouth is not mentioned, nor is the Gunsgreen/Merchant House, although there is an unnamed (no caption) photo of it on the page. Farefeerfalling (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So please dig out the sources, then go ahead and add it. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of smuggling/Gunsgreen House should be added.
Talk:Norse clans

message: There is also a Norse Clan inspired by Ragnar Lodbrok:
http://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/EnglandIvarr.htm
Kenneth Alanson 12:50, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Also a group of runes. Kortoso (talk) 19:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runes
Talk:Cell (biology)/to do

message: * Add information on the diversity of cell types/shapes/functions/etc, both among unicellular and multicellular organisms.  
* Add information on other basic cellular processes (e.g. absorption/secretion, cell signalling, intracellular transport); also refer briefly to more specialized functions such as electrical conduction
99.65.214.26 (talk) 00:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Kim Hyong-jik

message: Why does the entry for Kim bo-hyun (his father) redirect back to this article?
--Alexxx1 00:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If North Korea actually put out any real information they'd be used as a source, as it is the only information out there is from the West. --70.145.76.243 (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

message: How could Kim Hyong-jik have been a communist politician as the page claims, if the DPRK was not established till years after his death? Is there something I'm missing?  –Benjamin   02:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The Communist Party of Korea was founded in 1925, the year before Kim's death, so it is possible that he was a Communist politician (of some kind), but I've removed this because there is no citation for the claim.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communist politician? 

message: This occurred in 1866, so it would have been very difficult for Kim Bo-hyon (born 1871) to have been involved. Alekksandr (talk) 22:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: ''General Sherman'' Incident

message: How would Kim Bo-hyon be redirected here when Kim Bo-hyon is the father of Kim Hyong-jik?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HanShizong1101 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kim Bo-hyon redirected to this page 

message: I'm skeptical about the claim that he was a communist. Kim's parents were centrist Korean Christian nationalists. There was a whole period of time when Kim had friction with his family because of his increasingly communist beliefs while in China toobigtokale (talk) 01:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, of course. It seems tho that he's presented by DPRK historiography as a left-leaning patriot. MagnusRegnumAntichristiAdvenit (talk) 08:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communist?
Talk:Comparison of cross-platform instant messaging clients

message: Riot.im, Hoccer and Kontalk could also be added to the charts. 94.220.154.71 (talk) 08:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Each of those three messengers should have a Wikipedia article first. See WP:WTAF. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 11:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ring fits that criterion. 94.220.152.66 (talk) 07:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: . --Dodi 8238 (talk) 17:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  What about Tox? --riveravaldez (talk) 07:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  It seems a protocol, not a client. If a client is released we'll add it. Brainfrogk4mon (talk) 08:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

text: These messaging apps do not meet this article's inclusion criteria. Before adding a client, ensure that it has a corresponding Wikipedia article, or create the article first using the software notability essay as a guideline. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 09:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

text: Linux is not "Ubuntu". I mean, if they just miss a release or an update. Brainfrogk4mon (talk) 09:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Software
Talk:Simon the Zealot

message: I notice that in the sentence about Mark 6:3, clarifying that Simon Zelotes is not the Simon mentioned there, that Simon is described as the "brother" of Jesus (in quotes). Is this meant to suggest that the Bible is wrong on that matter?
Steve Graham (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Biblical

message: "Apostle Simon is burried in Komani (Georgia)."  This still-unsourced assertion has now been moved here. Googling "Simon Komani Georgia" brings up nothing about a shrine in Komani. Any sound information would be welcome in the article. --Wetman 17:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Komani, Georgia"?

message: The Christianity box actually overlaps some of the text of the first paragraph. Should be a quick fix but I don't know how to do it. Jefs 13:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor changes 

message: Shimon Ghayyour is the Arabic/Farsi/Urdu translation of 'Simon the Zealot'. In Arabic, Urdu and Persian versions of Bible the name 'Simon Zealot' is translated as 'Shimon Ghayyour'.
:And what is so special about that language that it should be emphasised in the first line of the article? Surely a translation of Simon the Zealot exists in many languages - should they all appear in the first sentence of the article? 220.253.67.90 11:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shimon Ghayyour

message: Zelotes redirects here.  I think it needs to be made a disambig, as Zelotes is the name of a genus within family Gnaphosidae.  The Jade Knight (talk) 21:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zelotes (Genus) 

message: OK, I find:
'Simon, whom he named Peter, and Andrew his brother, and James and John, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon who was called the Zealot, and Judas ["the son" is interpolated] of James, and Judas Iscariot, who became a traitor. (Luke 6:14-16, RSV)'
The single quotation marks at beginning and end are mine.  The point is that this is not a complete sentence.  Is it supposed to say something like "Jesus' 12 apostles were:"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 15:14, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a complete sentence 

message: or Cleopas and "Mary wife of Cleopas". I don't know how sure people are about the legitimacy of this link, but it's been commonly enough thought (e.g., his entry in Annales Cambriae) that it deserves inclusion on the page. — LlywelynII 00:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Son of Clopus
Talk:Zonguldak Province

message: ==Improve==
I improved the quality of the English on this page, and now it can all be understood, I think, except for one clause.
This is my first edit.  I just stumbled upon this page doing Random page, and I don't know what to do with it now, so I will just post this note and leave it.
Andrew (apanda@hotmail.com)
== Map ==
As a person living in Zonguldak I should say this map is terrible.It looks like drawn by a primary school boy.I prefer a blank instead of it.
I deleted it.Jagatai Khan 22:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: As a person living in Zonguldak I should say this map is terrible.It looks like drawn by a primary school boy.I prefer a blank instead of it.
I deleted it.Jagatai Khan 22:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 