Talk:Auxiliary power unit

message: "currently the most common APU units for Highway trucks are; Wabaso, Proheat, and Espar."
these aren't APUs, they are actually diesel-fired heaters. As for the most common APU, I've seen more Thermo King TriPacs on trucks than any other make in my time on the road.--Lpimlott (talk) 04:28, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Truck APUs

message: I would like to change the name of the "Other" category to "Fuel Cells" and update the information there.  Since there are only 2 sentences there now, I would just replace those with the following...
In recent years truck and fuel cell manufacturers have teamed up to create, test and demonstrate a fuel cell APU that eliminates emissions and uses diesel fuel more efficiently.   In 2008, a DOE sponsored partnership between Delphi Electronics and Peterbilt demonstrated that a fuel cell could provide power to the electronics and air conditioning of a Peterbilt Model 386 under simulated "idling" conditions for 10 hours.  Delphi has scheduled the 5 kW system for Class 8 trucks to be released in 2012, at a $8000-9000 price tag that will be competitive with other "midrange" APU's.  Benfchea (talk) 16:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the "Other" Category for Truck APU's 

message: The military aircraft section of this article is totally false. The swedish JAS-39 Gripen, the most petite supersonic fighter jet of this era, has a full airliner style APU. It's a small turbine engine made by Sundstrand-Hamilton, that gives her complete autonomy on the tarmac (or the autobahn): starts propulsion, sustains full avionics and comms while idling for an alert, facilitates in-flight propulsion restart in case of FOD or flame-out incident, etc. The F-15, F-16 have nothing like that kind of autonomy, as they depend on an APU truck. If they start without an APU, only "ferry/skeleton" avionics will be available, with no combat functionality at all. 87.97.98.5 (talk) 20:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-swedish bias complained. 

message: The best picture we have is an exhaust?    SChalice  19:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main image 

message: Using the first sentence of the initial paragraph as a definer, there's nothing that says APUs have to be small gas generators (turbines), or that the C-124 was the first military airplane with an APU.  Plenty of large military aircraft--B-29, B-17, all the way back to the PBY--had on-board power units to drive a generator and supply electricity when the engines weren't running.  Some of them were even started with pull-cords, like a lawnmower, but they definitely were sources of auxiliary power even though they were gasoline-powered reciprocating engines, both two- and four-cycle. 173.62.11.221 (talk) 21:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why limit APUs to turbines? 

message: There seems to be a bit of confusion on "first" military aircraft with an APU:
* The C-124 article states that it was the the first military aircraft with an APU.
** This is incorrect if one is to believe this article, which states that the Me 262 was the first military aircraft with an APU.
* This article states that the C-124 is the first American military aircraft with an APU.
** This is also incorrect if one is to believe the YFM-1 article. 
*** Although it might make the C-124 the first operational American military aircraft with an APU.
**** Except the source given for the C-124 makes no claim to either of the "firsts" mentioned above.
* However, if one believes the YFM-1 article, then the (unsourced, I might add) Me 262 claim made on this article is also incorrect as the YFM-1 was built in 1937.
** The same qualification about "operational" could be made for the 262 claim as was made for the 124; as well as an additional one for being the first jet.
So we seem to be at a quandary. And seeing as I have no idea as to which, if any, of the above claims are actually true, I am not of much more help. Can anyone who is at least some sort of an authority on the matter try to clear this up? --Noha307 (talk) 01:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: After reading more of the article (and the above section, duh!), it appears that some of the confusion might stem from what is defined as an APU. --Noha307 (talk) 01:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Try Supermarine Nighthawk for a really early APUNigel Ish (talk) 07:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not unusual to find qualified claims (like first operational APU) or even different references making conflicting claims. As per WP:V we have to go with what the refs actually say and if they conflict then either remove all the claims, or, more usually, indicate the conflict of sources and cite the conflicting ones to explain the controversy. - Ahunt (talk) 13:08, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For the time being I'll remove the Me-262 claim, since it's unsourced, and replace it with the Supermarine Nighthawk claim. --Noha307 (talk) 19:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Military Aircraft with an APU 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Auxiliary power unit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131201022606/http://www.boeing.com:80/commercial/noise/suvarnabhumi.html to http://www.boeing.com/commercial/noise/suvarnabhumi.html#apu
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Auxiliary power unit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boeing.com/commercial/noise/suvarnabhumi.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120403131809/http://www.uctc.net/papers/587.pdf to http://www.uctc.net/papers/587.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified