Talk:Embedded journalism

message: There is nothing neutral or informative in this article. It goes right from the broad introduction to criticisms. Huh? --134.29.149.85 (talk) 14:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps because there is nothing positive to say about it. --386-DX (talk) 01:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: Shouldn't there be a bit more mention of the media reports in the Gulf War? (E.G. CNN and other networks) I would imagine that was the start of 'television on the frontlines'. -- Eptin 06:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I believe the term "embedded" was in use then as well.Ventifax (talk) 00:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins

message: What a propaganda junk is that? --Leladax (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The [[United States military]] responded to pressure from the country's news media who were disappointed" 

message: I removed that part due to the very simple fact that it sounded rather close to POV, especially since none of those words were actually mentioned in the source for the statement, neither directly or in any other way. Pavuvu (talk) 13:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Courage and independence"

message: In-text citation for "United States Of America and France have official banned embedded journalists, considering[6] it a dangerous act and thus recognizing that its advantages are not enough to cover its disadvantages." cites the reference entry ""embedded journalism". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2016-03-03."" leading to an article that makes no mention of the word banned, or France. Where is this fact from? Rsong81 (talk) 15:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validity of reference 6? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Embedded journalism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090902091331/http://www.militarycity.com/iraq/1631270.html to http://www.militarycity.com/iraq/1631270.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Iraq/embedded.html
*Added  tag to http://www.democracynow.org/static/IMIATOW.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080524003241/http://www.hcss.nl/en/project/495/Project-Embedded-Journalism.html to http://www.hcss.nl/en/project/495/Project-Embedded-Journalism.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It talks about the American aspect of the war. What war? It's not clear and it's not particularly general to the criticisms of embedded journalism as a concept, rather than its application in any specific war.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scotty1141 (talk • contribs) 06:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism Section - too American 

message: Embedded journalism in the United States can also refer to "campaign embeds," who follow a specific campaign (most prominently, for President) usually from start to finish. This article should be updated to add the angle of campaign embedded reporting to that of military embedded reporting. Eliaszjm (talk) 19:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campaign embeds 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jamie.green-2 (talk) 18:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Communication