Talk:SHGb02+14a

message: If anyone knows how to change the article from "SHGb02 14a" to "SHGb02+14a", please do. I doubt that this is really litte green men, but it is still newsworthy.  pstudier 22:08, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Can anybody elaborate or clarify the following sentence "The frequency of the signal has a rapid drift," what type of drift ? movement of the source? frequency drift? etc.
From the context of the rest of the statement, it seems pretty clear that this  is talking about frequency drift: the Doppler shift due to changes in the radial distance due to its rapid orbit.
Old_Wombat (talk) 08:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Meaning that the source was moving??? Kortoso (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: drift

message: :Image:SHGb02-14a.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For future reference: The file was removed from the article on , and deleted for lack of a rationale. I  the file and added a rationale. --Waldir talk 16:28, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:SHGb02-14a.jpg 

message: The drifting is the bit that made me think that maybe this is a signal from some sort of scanner. Maybe it was a ship conducting long range scans. It would certainly explain all the pecularities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.121.65.129 (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scanner? 

message: Why don't they release the precise coordinates of the signal? Is this supposed to be science? How is anyone else ever supposed to check anything? What purpose is served by this secrecy? Why should people contribute resources to SETI@home if they're not going to share the results?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.0.146.111 (talk) 07:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secrecy 

message: Do any credible sources theorize that it could be a moving spaceship? This might account for it being in deep interstellar space, far from any star, and possibly the drift of the signal as well. 
71.196.239.194 (talk) 02:36, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Would that account for the signal drift? Kortoso (talk) 19:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving Spaceship 

message: Source: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6341
"... there is no obvious star or planetary system within 1000 light years..." As opposed to the 200 ly in this article.
Also this paragraph reads as if the listed features are the reasons given for skepticism. Kortoso (talk) 17:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Kortoso (talk) 19:06, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance 

message: Hi, I found something intriguing.
Its been suggested that the anomalies in orbits within the outer Solar System could be explained by the presence
of a micro black hole with approximately 5 Earth masses in a long orbit.
If this is proved correct then it could account for the signals periodically seen by SETI as well as the 1977 "Wow!" 
signal, due to gravitational lensing of a much weaker signal or for that matter scintillation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.111.195.136 (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Micro black hole (MBH)