Talk:Sensory processing

message: What on earth is this drivel in the 2nd paragraph? Why would anyone consider it a condition? It's clearly stated in the first paragraph that sensory integration is a routine (necessary) part of cognition and living. Additionally, it's a an area in which psychologists are highly active - this is my field. I'm going to remove that whole paragraph. Feel free to respond to my criticisms and reinstate it. Tdwright (talk) 12:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't reinstate it, but I'll point out that there is a bunch more nonsense in the article, and that paragraph at least had the value of raising suspicion among readers.  "Sensory integration dysfunction"??? Gahh. Looie496 (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd paragraph? 

message: Sensory processing should be considered as main title, to create internal site coherence, since Sensory integration dysfunction was merged into Sensory processing disorder. The term is the accepted in diagnostic manuals and the one supported by more reliable papers and research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chibs007 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. That is, to Sensory processing, not to Sensory Processing... Lova Falk talk 07:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

text: Support Sensory processing dolfrog (talk) 15:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Sensory Processing 

message: I think this page would benefit from added paragraphs explaining Propioception, Vestibular and Tactile systems in the relation to adequate sensory processing Chibs007 (talk) 17:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propioception, Vestibular, Tactile section  

message: currently redirects to this article. Could it be retargeted to Multisensory integration, or have I missed some technical distinction between the topics? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. And about dang time. Dranorter (talk) 18:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Target of "Sensory integration" redirect 

message: I think it might make a lot of sense to merge any useful content from this article into Sensory nervous system, and leave this page as a redirect.
* The first few paragraphs of this article make very repetitive claims about it being old-fashioned to think of each sense as attached to a certain lobe. This is the aftermath of overcorrecting an initially quite ignorant article. Content on the history of knowledge about multisensory integration belongs there.
* The remaining content of this article — actual discussion of sensory processing — seems to be already covered better over at Sensory nervous system.
Dranorter (talk) 19:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal 

message: Why does sensitivty (human) redirect here? Sensitivity (human) means the strength of human emotional reactions, and this seems to be about something other than that. Vorbee (talk) 18:36, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sensitivity (human)

message: I'm confused by the editorialising of the phrase "a very bizarre operation". Why is this in here? It doesn't actually strike me as that strange a thing to do, as strange science goes. You've got a person who can tell you what they feel when you poke bits of their brain. So... poke it and see what happens?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.147.221 (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Sensory processing's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "APA":
From Psychopathology: 
From Asperger syndrome: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Sensory processing]]