lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hungarian hip hop

message: Azt még talán megérteném, hogy miért kellett kitörölni a Ganxsta nyúlásairól szóló szöveget(amikre mellesleg bizonyíték is van - elég összehasonlítani az eredetivel), de miért kellett eltávolítani azt a 3 szerencsétlen underground bandát? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.182.25.24 (talk • contribs) 
:Translation:"I would understand the deletion of the parapgraph telling the sample stealing issues about Ganxsta Zolee (BTW for which there are evidences - simply compare his songs with the original ones), if there weren't 3 other undergorund groups removed from the page."Don't leave messages in any language but English. Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 19:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NOne of them were real rap music only in their names (consider Hip Hop Boys for example a boyband-turned-weddingpop line-up). The only older "successful" band could be Happy Gang, whose first LP sounded more rap-like than their follow-up love songs. But I guess the whole article could stand without mentioning the above said efforts in the genre. Lajbi Holla @ me 00:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, I think Neurotic did in fact influence quite a few hip-hop bands (Az árral szemben used the words from Neurotic's Brék as the chorus in their song Divat). Geszti's role in bringing rap to the Hungarian mainstream is undeniable as well, Zana's Kartell could never have become so big without Geszti and co. clearing the path first. Fenyő's 1984 album is only a curiosity, but it is rap without a doubt (and quite probably the first album ever recorded to contain rap in Hungarian). KovacsUr 13:19, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't oppose you writing all this into the artcile. Lajbi Holla @ me 21:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: A short section should be written about  Hungarian hip hop into the Hungarian Rock/Subgenres, with a 'Main Article Hungarian hip hop'  link to this article. :-)    --Harom65 (talk) 09:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Hungarian hip hop' into 'Hungarian rock' article
Talk:Thakazhi Sivasankara Pillai

message: cleaned up: intend to add short paragraph each on major works; + mention kaatha and the the meuseum at sankaramangalam--Pournami 14:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: to do
Talk:Khepri

message: A source for the second paragraph, in regards to the incorporation of Khepri into an aspect of Re:
In the course of the 18th Dynasty, the rise to prominence of Amun of Thebes resulted in his assimilation to the supreme god, the sun-god Re. Furthermore, the conceptual dominance of sun worship had turned the sun-god into the all-embracing creator-god who manifested himself in many forms and under many names. Thus he absorbed Amun and Horus, and he was Atum, Harakhti, and Khepri.
Hallo, William W.(Editor). Context of Scripture : Canonical Compositions, Monumental Inscriptions and Archival Documents from the Biblical World. Leiden, , NLD: Brill, N.H.E.J., N.V. Koninklijke, Boekhandel en Drukkerij, 2003. p 43.
L Hamm 06:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an unusual image, but he was portrayed that way sometimes. The prime example comes from the tomb of Nefertari: . A. Parrot (talk) 19:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  For citations 

message: Khepri is not same as non-Egyptian "Zeper" and there is not a ? in kpr should be "k", all Egyptologists follow this, see gardiner sign L1.
86.153.84.245 (talk) 22:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — Andy W. (talk) 00:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 November 2016 

message: are there really no other ways to represent this god other than taking Ra and slapping a beetle over the head? 2601:801:8100:D1E0:C3:2B62:D584:E4BF (talk) 02:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That is how the Egyptians portrayed him in the tomb of Nefertari. (See right.) Khepri's iconography was fairly limited; either we portray him as a human with a beetle for a head, or just as a beetle. A. Parrot (talk) 06:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: When looking at the picture used with a scarab on the face, it could also represent something seen in the islamic world, where statues are defaced. Though this has not been recorded, I add this for other egyptologists to consider in their research. Though the concept of a scarab and renewal is well founded, with the main picture it looks more like hiding the pharoah, deities face. This kind of practice probably has been done before. Even in the Moses mythology, we hear Ramses saying to remove all records of Moses in Egypt. And Akhenaten where he left to start a new cult following to the Aten. It could also represent the deceased, divorced, disliked, unknown, seeking something new. Kozan Huseyin (talk) 10:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting Note 

message: — Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 18:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 311_History of Ancient Egypt
Talk:Nam Cheong (MTR)

message: I strongly suggest combining the two articles Nam Cheong (MTR) and Nam Cheong (KCR) into one single article.  It is a waste of resources to describe one station* in two articles.
Note:  The station is, afterall, claimed to be jointly built and/or owned by the two railway companies.  Moreover, both railways share exits and half-share the paid areas, while in Mei Foo, (East) Tsim Sha Tsui and Kowloon Tong their paid areas are not even touching each other.
Patrickov 14:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:EMD FP45

message: Please reveal what this means.  It cannot mean a hood locomotive, since cowl and cab unit locomotives also engaged in hauling freight, while plenty of hood locomotives hauled and still haul passenger trains, as well as hood, cowl and cab units operate(d) in dual service.  If it's a term invented by "foamers", then it ought to be edited out and replaced with what is truly meant.
70.105.205.87 05:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freight-style?? 

message: I think the article looks OK. What copy editing is needed? Biscuittin (talk) 22:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit tag
Talk:Thoovanathumbikal

message: article requires cleanup and removal of stuff like "legendary character" etc.. fancruft--Pournami 14:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Imdb mentions the genre as Fantasy.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0249188/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arindam Skywalkar (talk • contribs) 17:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 
Talk:EMD F40C

message: #610 is still in the yard at NREC in Dixmoor, IL as of March 28, 2015. WriterWithNoName (talk) 21:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivors 
Talk:Denny Miller

message: Caption of image was wrong. The Gilligan's Island episode with “Tongo” was a color episode from the 1966–1967 season; the black-and-white image shown was of “Duke Williams” from an episode from the 1964–65 season. — Bellhalla 14:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the infobox photo be cropped so the fan does not appear, which would leave a larger photo of Miller?  Thanks!  GoingBatty (talk) 21:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crop infobox photo?
Talk:Cross-tolerance

message: I'm not exactly sure what the last (previously only) paragraph refers to.  Out of respect to the original author and ignorance of the material they present, I will leave it be, but would someone who knows more about immunology please investigate further?
:From my knowledge of medicine which is somewhat limited although it is an interest of mine it looks like an explaination of the theoretical mechanism behind cross tolerance however I do not have sufficient knowledge to be sure or to give it some much needed expansion, if the mechanism is to be described it really should be dealt with more fully than that, I hope someone with the required knowledge will be able to expand on that. MttJocy 12:02, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, although there are a vast quantity of inaccuracies in both this paragraph and the cross-presentation article. the line here "This mechanism was proposed to silence autoreactive T cells that have escaped negative selection in the thymus." is totally wrong, it is the mechanism of the negative selection, thymocytes which escape the negative selection are dealt with by Treg cells in the periphery. Other than that the cross-presentation article seems to have been written by someone who has no clue what it is and has totally misunderstood the contents of the references. Cross-priming isn't even a synonym for cross presentation, they are subtly different (one is the process of moving antigen around in a dendritic cell, one is the presentation of the exogenous antigen-MHC class I complex to the thymocytes as part of the thymic education of CD8 cells). I'd make edits but to be honest the pages need scrapping.--KX36 (talk) 17:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm
Talk:Courtney Campbell Causeway

message: I don not know the dates or History of this Bridge it is However easily seen as a Newer Development than the CCC</blockquote>
This DOES NOT BELONG on the main article page. It belongs here on the discussion page where it can be discussed as to the correct course of action. Rhatsa26X (talk) 21:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, SR 580 goes over Safety Harbor (the body of water for which the city is named).  So, the statement about the Causeway being northern-most is correct. EaglesPhilliesFanInTampa 21:52, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:University of Massachusetts Boston

message: Since your inclusion of the maintenance tag in the History section of the article, I have moved content from the section to either the Campus section or to other articles. Another editor made a single edit that removed 314 bytes of content that violated WP:BOOSTER. The article's readable prose size is currently at 52 kB and the History section is currently at 43 kB. At the time of the maintenance tag, the article was at 60 kB. Because the overwhelming majority of the content that has been removed is from the History section, I think I can say that roughly 8 kB has been taken entirely from the History section. Per the WP:SPLIT rule of thumb, the article is still at a length that may require division. What other content in the History section do you think can warrant removal or relocation to other articles? Some of the content in the 2015 to present subsection is included in the J. Keith Motley and Marty Meehan articles (and I'd note that there is a fair number of news items published by the Dorchester Reporter and The Boston Globe related to 2017–2018 budget controversy that  I'm aware of that are not summarized anywhere on those articles or the UMass Boston article and I do not think would make them overly detailed). -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not immediately sure exactly what material should be removed from this section and placed into a new History of University of Massachusetts Boston article but there is more than enough here to substantiate the creation of that new article. ElKevbo (talk) 03:36, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Made another major reorganization to content: moved all Columbia Point campus content in the History section to the Campus section. The History section is now down to 36 kB. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Moved more content from History section to Campus section. History section readable prose size now down to 31 kB. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:30, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section length
Talk:Anthem of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic

message: The current name of the country "Belarus", was created in 1991 with the independence declared of the Byelorussian SSR. They use "Belarus", transliteration of the country's name in their native language (Беларусь), instead of "Byelorussia" or "Belorussia", transliteration of the country's name in Russian (Белоруссия), just like Moldova (changed from "Moldavia" given by Russians). So, please note that during the time of the existence of the Byelorussian SSR, there were no such words called "Belarus", "Belarusian "or "Belarusan". That is why I change it back. (Of course, "Byelorussian" is also okay) --Kibinsky 15:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Belorussian?

message: Please join discussion at Talk:Anthem of the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic#Discuss inclusion of lyrics.--Nø (talk) 14:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of lyrics?
Talk:Ryton, Tyne and Wear

message: We have had some competitive editing.  I would suggest that the question is one for those living locally to decide.  In making alterations, please log in and sign your contributions, so that the rest of us know who has done it.  I have no particular view on the subject, but I live in another part of the country, in a village with about 5600.  Size should not be a determinant, but its status in relation to the surrounding region.  Peterkingiron 14:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village or town 

message: It's interesting to see that Northumbria in Bloom puts Ryton in the same category (small town) as Hexham.  Hexham is wayyyy bigger than Ryton - it even has its own general hospital! 
However, on the grounds that "town" is a term no longer limited to places with town charters, or to market towns...fair enough.  And I stand corrected on the Welcome to Ryton sign!  Cazarooni 10:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  a villagey sort of town... 

message: Being generous, someone has been careless with an edit. But it does say "the poo industry"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Barnett (talk • contribs) 13:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. This is the vandalism edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ryton,_Tyne_and_Wear&diff=668340592&oldid=643084420 Geordiecoder (talk) 14:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The poo industry? 
Talk:Aílton (footballer, born 1973)

message: I've created the basic page from the corresponding article on the German Wikipedia, by using Google Translate. There were bits that I couldn't fathom, which I've left out, but I figured this was better than nothing. Perhaps a German speaking person could fill in the gaps? - N (talk) 15:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: It is kind of hard to get hold of data on his old American clubs. I found that he scored 5 goals in 16 matches for Tigres in Mexico.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ailton_Gon%C3%A7alves_da_Silva&action=edit
How about the other clubs. The Football Manager 2007 database tells me that he scored 20 goals in 43 matches for Guarani. Should that be included? Can anyone check that data?
:Found some info on this page .--Gavin1234 14:46, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics 
Talk:Operation Quicksilver (deception plan)

message: I hope I am doing this right.  Please, feel free to correct me or give me pointers if I get this whole "talking" thing wrong, but I really wanted to comment on this interesting discussion as the topic interests me a great deal.  I first heard of the "Ghost Soldiers" and this deception a year or so ago and I was so surprised that I'd never heard of it, because as a teen I was a major WW2 junkie and read everything I got my hands on about it. lol   Anyway, I was wondering if the following links might help with your debate?  
   >> http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1997/Wendell.htm
   >> http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/14army.htm
   >> http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/011109/ghost.shtml
   >> http://www.ghostarmy.org/
I think it's so fascinating and creative that our military thought of using this type of psyop during the war.  I totally love the whole "mind f**k" element of psychological warfare and deceptions like this.  Take that Nazi's! <g>   Hope this may help you out,  JJaybird06 12:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ghost Soldiers
Category talk:Philadelphia

message: *
*
*
I am only talking about the Philadelphia County category, not the single county article.
Wikipedia lists Philadelphia as a consolidated city-county, Any article that doesn't belong directly in the Philadelphia Category and is related to the County, probably belongs elsewhere (like history).
*Consolidated city-county
It seems to me that Wikipedia’s standard practice to have only a single category for conterminous zones. 
I am not saying that the articles need to be merged. The Philadelphia County article should remain separate as there was a separate history until 1854. In this case, I think the articles are different than San Francisco County, California which redirects to San Francisco, California; Nantucket County, Massachusetts which redirects to Nantucket, Massachusetts; Kings County, New York which redirects to Brooklyn.
evrik 16:47, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Philadelphia Related Pages

message: *Support evrik 19:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: No/oppose, this issue has been discussed extensively, at here, here, and threw your own failed and illadvised cfd    here, all of which you have chosen and continue to ingnore, over the objections of other editors. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 03:40, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: *Neutral on this issue. Although I voted support in favor of the category merger in the CfD discussion, I was unaware of the prior distinction between Philadelphia County and the City of Philadelphia. Since I don't have a dog in this fight, I don't particularly care either way. Evrik, considering your repeated failed attempts to gain consensus on a merger, I don't see this happening anytime soon. I think it's time you just accepted that this is how it's going to be. Sorry. howcheng  {chat} 17:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral

message: I'm going to redirect the County category. South Philly 13:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taking the bulls by the horn

message: Three days since the last set of reverts, is this compromise holding? evrik 16:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it holding?

message: Is anyone watching this category and weeding it? --South Philly 13:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just weeded it. I put several articles in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania category in subcategories. Houses, neighborhoods and people should all go in subcategories, and only a few main articles should be here.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Clutter
Talk:Fort De Soto Park

message: I think it's hard to separate the two. Merge.Mikereichold 01:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the other article is no more than a stub, and all of that information is basically over here as well. I say delete the other one and have it redirect here. Tboger 03:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I have images at User:Dlohcierekim's_sock#Fort_De_Soto_Park that might be useful. I created a galery subpage before I knew better.    Dlohcierekim  01:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 

message: It now costs $5 to take a drive through Ft Desoto.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.99.86.219 (talk) 14:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As of 1/1/2012, yes. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry fee 
Talk:Batteries Not Included

message: It is actually a film, just all the infomation provided at the moment is complete rubbish. Grandwazir 15:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not speedy this page, i'm adopting it and will improve it over the course of the evening. Grandwazir 17:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the first line of the character description for Mason Baylor the apartment building is described as decadent. I'm fairly sure the intention here was to say decaying or dilapidated.
http://www.ketzer.com/original_movie_props/wheems.html
http://modelhead.com/news/category/batteries-not-included/
Anywhere know where any original props are? ILM vaults?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.65.21 (talk) 01:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo? 

message: Why is this part in the Production section surrounded by curly brackets instead of more standard parentheses?
{formerly Liberty Plaza Park} --Meve Stills (talk) 21:11, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. --Meve Stills (talk) 21:11, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curly brackets? 

message: Why is the Netflix version showing only a short part of the origingal fledging scene? The original portrayal of patents sawing off the wood steps to force the babies to fly was delightful material for many of our family discussions. Now it is mostly missing.  r3 (talk) 20:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit of fledging scene? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect *Cocoon. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 4#*Cocoon until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "*Cocoon" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: This film is apparently also named "Miracle on 8th Street" (after all it redirects here) but the article does not mention why. JIP | Talk 22:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miracle on 8th Street 

message: "To Kovacs' fury the construction crew, out of respect for Harry, refuse to continue..." This is the first mention of Kovacs on the page. Who is he, and what does he have to do with the story? WaxTadpole (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Kovacs? 

message: What does this mean? Tiles? Who keeps tiles in a jar? 193.119.99.124 (talk) 19:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breaks his jar of tiles…?
Talk:Nafa

message: Nafa is one of the missing articles. After some digging () I believe this is a reference to Naha. I created a redirect from Nafa to Naha. It's possible that "Nafa" could refer to "the Muslim saint Shah Mushk Nafa (died 1497)" (), but I think they would have written is name out. --Fang Aili 15:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Animal Aid

message: We need an independent source for the claim "Animal Aid is the United Kingdom's second largest animal rights group and one of the longest established in the world..." Ermintrude 15:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First paragraph claims

message: I've restored an earlier version of this article, as it was turning into something they might have on their own website. The article needs to be reasonably well written and not overflowing with praise and endless details about campaigns. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The previous version included "Our school video puts the moral and scientific arguments against animal experimentation," which I take it means someone simply copied and pasted material from the Animal Aid website, and that's exactly what the article read like. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: can some one tell me their views about Animal Aid ?
thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.166.41 (talk) 19:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  views
Talk:Emyr Jones Parry

message: Here is the older image. CrypticBacon 16:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older image 

message: I do figure that there's a connection between the British name & the Arab title; but, I don't know how:
< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emir >;
< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emyr_Jones_Parry >.
Hopiakuta 18:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: emyr
Talk:Jim Marurai

message: date of birth ???
85.75.98.136 16:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled