lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:São Tomé

message: I would like to see the official language (Portuguese) listed in the article and the main industry (Tourism (~60%) and agriculture (sugar cane/coffee)) https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-biggest-industries-in-sao-tome-and-principe.html    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FCC8:6306:A300:B1B8:70BC:15AD:56EF (talk) 12:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsorted text

message: São Tomé (population 53,300 in 2003) is the capital city of São Tomé and Príncipe and is by far the nation's largest town.
I GUESS THAT MAKES SENSE. .
:What are you failing to understand about that? 70.117.146.245 (talk) 12:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging from the number of people in town and in the country, it looks like it is the only town. Rather obvious that it is the largest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.201.89.249 (talk) 09:42, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  uhm 

message: This article is supposed to be about the city of São Tomé, but the vast majority of the content is about the nation of São Tomé and Príncipe - history, demographics etc. It should need pretty much complete rewriting to be actually about the city it's meant to be, instead of just a rehash of the country page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EJBH (talk • contribs) 22:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've removed all the info about the country. Graham87 12:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  City or Country 

message: The article misses the most important point about the country's location -- it's off the coast of Africa.
One might guess that from the line about "proximity to the African kingdom." I discovered it by clicking the latitude link.
Why don't we come out and say it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.83.182.43 (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographic location 

message: It would be great if someone could add a map to this article; there is no indication of where in the world this island sits! MeegsC (talk) 13:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map? 

message: The title should be spelled correctly in English, not Portuguese, as is the current title. I thought I would mention this glaring oversight here before embarking on changing it. No doubt some editors will have a different opinion. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 07:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect title
Talk:Ostmark

message: Though this article says that "Ostmark is a modern German term to translate the term "Ostarrîchi"" and "for the core territory of Austria, more or less modern Lower Austria.", this links to :de:Sächsische Ostmark. It should be wrong. Additonally, There is another article for "Ostarrîchi" for the same contents. This is very confusing. These must be combined.--QBay 04:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then they changed it again in '42. PMA 09:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interlanguage
Talk:Scintillation counter

message: I've moved this from the scintillometer entry to scintillation counter here which is the much more frequently used term and because a scintillometer is also a totally unrelated scientific instrument used to measure air turbulence and heat transfer etc.
:Maybe there should be a disambiguation page instead. Most of the manufacturers of scintillation counters in North America (I worked for one of them for ten years) refer to them as scintillometers. Altaphon (talk) 05:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: scintillator is focused on the sciintillation processes and materials, I don't think they should be merged. Sergio Ballestrero 19:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The scintillation counter in my experience is an industrial instrument type in wide nuclear industry use, so I think the article stands on its own. I have done some text cleanup and added an image, and it could well be improved in the future to give examples of practical types. 
I have now created a category called "ionising radiation detectors" to cater for the day to day radiation instruments which are used for radiation protection, rather than for lab and research work, which is more in the realm of "particle detectors". This now covers the range of geiger, prop counters, ion chambers, etc.
Dougsim (talk) 07:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Update 2012

message: I would suggest that the inclusion of the table of SI photon units is not appropriate in the article as it stands. There is no obvious link between the table and the text. The table is best suited to stay in the article "Photon counting" which is linked from this article, and is a new stub article, which I think with some more work will be very useful for referencing from a number of radiation articles. I would suggest the SI photon units table is removed from the scintillation counter article. Dougsim (talk) 17:29, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SI photon units 

message: When I first saw the illustration on the right something struck me as odd. We see a pretty transverse sinus waveform enter the scintillating crystal and about halfway it seems to transform into a particle, and continues to travel in straight line. Or, perhaps it is not a particle at all, but a longitudinal wave, and the pretty sinus is mistaken... 67.206.161.133 (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Particle-Wave Duality? 
Talk:Mordehai Milgrom

message: Does this person deserve an article. If he does, why isn't the information *why* he deserves an article in the article?--Hemanshu 10:38, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a late response, but to pre-empt any attempt at deletion: He developed MOND, a hypothesis which has survived 20 years in a constantly-evolving field.  At least 200 publications have focused on this hypothesis.  If the hypothesis becomes a theory, his name will have a place in textbooks.  Why *doesn't* he deserve an article? 129.12.228.161 10:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hemanshu, btw the best way in the future to deal with problems like this is to add a  tag at the top of the page.  Jon513 11:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

text: See Modified Newtonian Dynamics or MOND. MathKnight 21:34, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I know this guy isn't well known but the person and his theory might be better presented if they were split into two seperate articles. Tiki God 09:26, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: MOND already has an article.  You're right; there's no need for an explanation of MOND in this article.  What this article needs is a bibliography, for example, he's written one or two articles for Scientific American, not to mention his dozens of publications in scientific journals.  There's a pretty exhaustive bibliography at "The MOND Pages," I believe. 129.12.228.161 19:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About The Split Tag
Talk:Dormancy

message: This article needs a bit of a rewrite to cover animal dormancy, as even the introduction is of a botanical nature only.  Fbriere 03:32, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite for animals

message: I have tried to add more detail to this page. but it's my first attempt so i have probably done something completely wrong. i'd apreciate somebody else reading and editing this and then letting me know where i went wrong so i won't do it again!!--SuperJ587 14:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncertainty

message: My understanding of hibernation vs. torpor does not match thiese definitions at all.  I am not a biologist, though, so I am relying on the informational plaques at the zoo and other sites like http://library.thinkquest.org/25553/english/animals/how/sleeplike.shtml   We think bears don't hibernate and torpor indicates a slightly reduced temperature, not a drop to ambient levels.  Any biologists out there?  Juneappal 19:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Torpor

message: It appears that Jean Henkens of Center Parks Belgium induces dormancy in trees by "injecting latex". Perhaps the technique can be mentioned in the article
91.182.165.141 (talk) 09:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Human-induced plant dormancy

message: The hibernation section states that hibernation is "used by many animals", but lists only mammals.  Also, it talks about decreased body temperature, which should mainly affect mammals.  I suspect that only mammals hibernate, and I think the article should more clearly state that, if it is true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.183.30 (talk) 20:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hibernation in mammals only? 

message: Dormancy is not limited only to biological life. It is also used to describe a period when a volcano's growth, development and activity are temporarily stopped. See dormant volcano. Volcanoguy 22:29, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not only biological
File talk:Krak2.jpg

message: From Wikipedia:Copyright problems
::I uploaded :Image:RomanChariot.jpg, :Image:ByzantineChariot.jpg, :Image:RomanChariotBig.jpg, :Image:ByzantineChariotBig.jpg, :Image:Krak1.jpg, :Image:Krak2.jpg, and also :Image:GreekChariot.jpg, :Image:GreekChariotBig.jpg, :Image:PatroclusChariot.jpg, and :Image:PatroclusChariotBig.jpg, which may be problems. Unfortunately I didn't think to make copies of the e-mail exchanges, but the Roman chariot picture is an ancient mosaic and the website's claim to copyright may be spurious. Same for the "Patroclus" and "Greek" ones. The Byzantine chariot pic and the pics of Krak des Chevalier are a bit more difficult - the people who took the photos said we could use them, and they seemed to understand the license, but if that's not good enough then I guess removing them is the only option. Sorry! Adam Bishop 22:01, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: A claim of fair use may be in order then - that is one reason why those were the only images I did not remove from the article. --mav 22:05, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The site appears to be trying to present an accurate rendition of an out of copyright Roman period work, so I see no potential for a valid copyright on the public domain mural :Image:RomanChariot.jpg and :Image:RomanChariotBig.jpg. Same for :Image:GreekChariot.jpg, :Image:GreekChariotBig.jpg, :Image:PatroclusChariot.jpg, and :Image:PatroclusChariotBig.jpg. No creativity so no fair use - no copyright at all - public domain. Jamesday 12:14, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm happy to accept the statement from Adam that he requested permission, was granted permission by those who understood the license and that the images :Image:ByzantineChariot.jpg :Image:ByzantineChariotBig.jpg :Image:Krak1.jpg :Image:Krak2.jpg are therefore released under the GFDL. Jamesday 12:52, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:The South End

message: * For 2004 talk, see Talk:The South End/Talk 2004
* For 2005 talk, see Talk:The South End/Talk 2005
* For 2006 talk, see Talk:The South End/Talk 2006
It resumed printing today, first day of classes at WSU. There probably won't be a 2007 error log. They make so many mistakes in each issue it's like shooting fish in a barrel. No fun. Nothing worth sending in to Jay Leno's Headlines. Carla Bondicteuresse 17:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I propose that the article Joseph Fisher be merged into this one then deleted. There's little in his article that isn't already covered here, and I imagine he'd fail the guidelines at WP:BIO. Thomjakobsen 22:50, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge. I hope in the future this young man does something positive enough to counteract his youthful outburst of infamy. But as of today I think he's only notable enough to mention in the South End article. Carla Bondicteuresse 15:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Hermione Gingold

message: According to Time magazine in 1971, she was engaged to the much younger Beaudoin Mills. No indication found if this resulted in another marriage. Dl2000 02:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1971 engagement

message: "Born Hermione Ferdinanda Gingold in London, England, she was the daughter of a high-standing Vienna-born Jewish financier James Gingold and Kate Walter or Walters, an English-born housewife. Her marriage to Lionel in 1894 was conducted by the Chief Rabbi." There is no mention anywhere else of "Lionel" - should this read "Her marriage to James"? I assume from the date that it refers to Kate's marriage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.244.246.25 (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life 

message: "...his Austrian-born wife, Hermine, after whom Hermione Gingold was named."
It seems fairly clear that "Hermine" should be "Hermione," but you just never know.  I was going to check the original source, but there doesn't seem to be any citation for this.  
Does anyone know for sure that this should be changed???  Zlama (talk) 08:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hermine -- Hermione 

message: Guy.  I apologize for saying this in advance.  But, IMHO, this photo of Ms. Gingold is absolutely horrible.  This makes her look unconditionally ugly.  Can't we find a better image of the late actress somewhere?  There must be hundreds available on the internet.   -- Jason Palpatine (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gingold in 1973, by [[Allan Warren]] 

message: After checking it today, it appears that at least some of Mrs. Gingold's filmography has been conflated with that of Hermione Baddeley, with whom she frequently co-starred. What stood out was "Aristocats" in 1970, which in fact featured Baddeley.
Oddly enough, I was checking Gingold's filmography because I was told by my fiancé that she played the maidservant in Mary Poppins, which was also Hermione Baddeley- so it appears this may be a common problem.
74.78.16.48 (talk) 17:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with Filmography?
Talk:Second Australian Imperial Force

message: I have removed the reference to I Corps because that was a floating name, switched frequently between different combinations of units, and the 2nd AIF divisions both initally and later in the war also came under II Corps. 
I suspect most Australians familiar with WW2 history would look blank when confronted by names like "I Corps" and "II Corps", although they would certainly have heard of the 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Divisions, as well as many individual battalions.
See, for example: http://www.diggerhistory.info/pages-conflicts-periods/ww2/pages-2aif-cmf/order_of_battle.htm 
Grant65 (Talk) 11:55, Jun 2, 2004 (UTC)
The Divisional Numbering for the Second Australian Imperial Force started at 6 as the previous 5 were the divisions that served in the first AIF, not because they were militia divisions. 
cheers
Will
Wrong. It was numbered 6th because the 1st through 5th Divisions existed in the Militia. The First AIF actually had a 6th Division for a time. See Long To Benghazi, p. 43.
Hawkeye7 06:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've tried to tidy it up a bit with regards to the headings. I've also changed a few words around, but shouldn't change the article too much. Are there any other ideas on the heading structure?
Flipper24 (talk) 11:11, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidy up & headings
Talk:Kosovo District

message: Note: All official material made by Government of Serbia is public by law. Information was taken from official website.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Avala (talk • contribs) 12:28, 2 June 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: Note: All official material made by UNMIK. Information was taken from (en) SOK Statistical Office of Kosovo - (sr) Zavod za Statistiku (sq) Kosova - Enti i Statistikës së Kosovës (ESK).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hipi Zhdripi~enwiki (talk • contribs) 17:45, 23 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NO 

message: This articel must be deledet or mergerd in one articel called Districts of Kosovo durin Milosevic time.--Hipi Zhdripi 03:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We should not delete this, but keep it as an historical article. We can also write one new article named Districts in Kosovo 1990-1999 where we can mention these 5 districts, but we should also keep these 5 articles and put them into "History of Kosovo" and "Serbian history" categories, since they in fact do not exist any more after 1999. PANONIAN (talk) 08:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delet 

message: Discussion moved from User talk:Cunard
This is Serbian Propaganda 
check Kosovo to see what I am talking about  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lontech (talk • contribs) 18:33, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This district appears to exist per this Google Books search. The tone of the article can be resolved through normal editing. If you still believe that this is a hoax, feel free to take this article to WP:AFD. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 19:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe existed during Milosevic Regime But dont exist anymore 
check kosovo http://www.osce.org/kosovo/13982.html--    LONTECH     22:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for providing the link. First, notability is not temporary, so the fact that Kosovo district existed and has received coverage in reliable sources means that it is notable. Second, your link proves that Kosovo district exists; see here. Cunard (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fushë Kosovë/Kosovo Polje is not a District it is MUNICIPALITY check Kosovo_Polje--    LONTECH     04:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Very true. I have asked , the creator of Kosovo District, to weigh in on this discussion. Cunard (talk) 04:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

text: You have to differentiate districts of Kosovo per the Govt of Serbia and per the Govt of Kosovo. Intl organizations can choose which division they'll use but they are not the ones deciding.--Avala (talk) 09:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of this article
Talk:Peć District (Serbia)

message: This articel must be deledet or mergerd in one articel called Districts of Kosovo durin Milosevic time.--Hipi Zhdripi 03:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We should not delete this, but keep it as an historical article. We can also write one new article named Districts in Kosovo 1990-1999 where we can mention these 5 districts, but we should also keep these 5 articles and put them into "History of Kosovo" and "Serbian history" categories, since they in fact do not exist any more after 1999. PANONIAN (talk) 09:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused, why is the discussion page for Peć District the same as the one for District of Peja/Peć? Talltim 15:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed (unredirected). I'm not sure that there should be a fork, but it seems as the most peaceful solution. Duja► 15:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delet 

message: HI,
I have added the albanian names to article, please leave them. there is a precedence on the Kosovo article.
thanks,
mike
James Michael DuPont 18:22, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have gotten support on this :Talk:Metohija#RfC:_Can_we_include_the_local_names_of_the_towns_as_well.3F James Michael DuPont 20:23, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding albanian and common english name
Talk:Prizren District (Serbia)

message: This articel must be deledet or mergerd in one articel called Districts of Kosovo durin Milosevic time.--Hipi Zhdripi 04:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We should not delete this, but keep it as an historical article. We can also write one new article named Districts in Kosovo 1990-1999 where we can mention these 5 districts, but we should also keep these 5 articles and put them into "History of Kosovo" and "Serbian history" categories, since they in fact do not exist any more after 1999. PANONIAN (talk) 09:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delet
Talk:Kosovska Mitrovica District (Serbia)

message: This articel must be deledet or mergerd in one articel called Districts of Kosovo durin Milosevic time.--Hipi Zhdripi 03:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We should not delete this, but keep it as an historical article. We can also write one new article named Districts in Kosovo 1990-1999 where we can mention these 5 districts, but we should also keep these 5 articles and put them into "History of Kosovo" and "Serbian history" categories, since they in fact do not exist any more after 1999. PANONIAN (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delet
Talk:List of places named after Vladimir Lenin

message: Leninské was proposal name of Bruntál (in Czechia). See http://web.archive.org/web/20040217233231/klaudyan.psomart.cz/hodit/osoby.html
: It also says: unreliable source, one person told this in 1994. Pavel Vozenilek 22:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Leninské

message: Shouldn't the Armenian one be Leninakan?
:Yes, it should. Thanks. --Kpalion 18:41, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Leninakan

message: Should things named after Lenin such as the Lenin Peace Prize have a separate list, or if there are only a few such things, could they be added to this list.
Tabletop 02:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things named after Lenin? 

message: I've moved this page from "List of places named after Lenin" to "List of places named after Vladimir Lenin". The sole reason was to match this article name to Vladimir Lenin and . However, if anyone strongly disagrees with this change, just let me know and I will move it back. I am assuming it is an uncontroversial move, but I could be wrong. If I am wrong, I'm willing to reverse it and either formally propose the move or drop the issue. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved page
Talk:Évora Municipality

message: could somebody remove or correct the first reference? The link seems to be incorrect!
New Article UMA POPULAÇÃO QUE SE URBANIZA, Uma avaliação recente - Cidades, 2004] Nuno Pires Soares, Instituto Geográfico Português (Geographic Institute of Portugal)
Pelzkragen (talk) 19:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  first reference 

message: It would be appreciated if any user could upload a picture of the Vasco da Gama statue in Évora to Wikipedia Commons. It is situated at . JMK (talk) 09:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vasco da Gama statue
Talk:Kosovo-Pomoravlje District

message: Pomoravlje District is A NATO Sector i Kosovo
The District in Kosovo since 1960 are Gjakova/Djakovica, Gjilan/Gnilan, Ferizaji/Urosvac, Mitrovica/ Kosovska Mitrovica, Prishtina/Pristina, Prizreni/Prizren, Peja/Pec 
This Districts are acceptit rom UNMIK--Hipi Zhdripi 19:14, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, I wrote that it is historical. PANONIAN (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a NATO Sector 

message: This articel must be deledet or mergerd in one articel called Districts of Kosovo durin Milosevic time.--Hipi Zhdripi 03:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We should not delete this, but keep it as an historical article. We can also write one new article named Districts in Kosovo 1990-1999 where we can mention these 5 districts, but we should also keep these 5 articles and put them into "History of Kosovo" and "Serbian history" categories, since they in fact do not exist any more after 1999. PANONIAN (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delet
Talk:James H. Clark

message: Saw James Clark's profile on facesofphilanthropy.com, noticed his Wiki page didn't have a philanthropy section, so I added one. Sir. Somerset (talk) 00:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Philanthropy

message: I Organized the content of this article, and also expanded on it and added additional references. Sir. Somerset (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded