lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Natalie Clein

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 21:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I removed Strontium Dog as this seems to be a facetious, or indeed fictitious, addition. Brequinda 12:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: "In 2015, Natalie Clein was appointed Artist in Residence for 4 years. She will curate a concert series in the context of this position." But where in residence? Paul Beardsell (talk) 13:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist in Residence? Where?
Talk:Cool Whip

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Ooh, it's am and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 3#Ooh, it's am until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 17:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ooh, it's am" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Republic of China at the 1972 Summer Olympics

message: This adds nothing that couldn't be entirely within the Republic of China page.  JDoorjam 13:11, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a stub. Why don't you help improve it? It is a standard article as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports Olympics. As such, it should not be merged. Besides, the archery results dont belong in the main ROC page. --Jiang 15:04, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh.  That looks like a zoo of a project.  Good luck with that. JDoorjam 18:24, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ma Yuan (Han dynasty)

message: This page was listed as a page needing wikification. I wikified it, but it has more problems than that.  The original writer did not use present or past tense verbs, so I do not know whether his daughter is married or was marrried, or is empress or was empress, so I used the present tense for both of them.  I've attempted Googling both of these topics to no avail, so I marked it as needing attention.  It is also a Stub Article and needs expanding. --Aluion 13:12, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was going to create Ma Yuan (painter), but to me it seems that in searches for Ma Yuan, the results are almost all about the painter rather than the general. So my question is this: Should this article be moved to Ma Yuan (general) or something similar? Rampart 16:51, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about an alternate Ma Yuan article

message: I am aware of no sources that reliably dates Ma's birth date.  Gentlemen/ladies, are you aware of any?  If so, please cite them.  Thanks.  --Nlu (talk) 18:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming you mean the Hou Han Shu biography of Ma Yuan (chapter 24), it does give an age (so Bo Yang, whom I was relying on, did err here) as 61 in 48 (remember that old Chinese dating has a person be "one" as soon as he or she is born).  That will make him born in 14 BC.  Thanks for following up.  --Nlu (talk) 23:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ma Yuan's birth date 

message: Ma Yuan's most important achievement was not mentioned! That is to establish the "Ma Yuan Copper Pillar" in today's Fuan Province, Vietnam. 李双能 (talk) 15:38, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ma Yuan Copper Pillar?
Talk:Bit-Tech

message: Hexus is much bigger than Bit-tech and based in the UK. I do not believe this point to be valid. If no one can come up with an accurate citation, it should be removed 82.47.0.158 (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest in the UK 

message: "Joe frequently features sections of his reviews told from a biased point of view, as if he were paid by Nintendo."; why is this sentence even here? It's about as encyclopaedic as my anus. I don't dare remove it lest I get flamed. --boiled_elephant (talk) 03:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold! It's unsourced and ambiguous (is it a joke, or a criticism? Is it trivial, or libellous?), so we should lose it. --McGeddon (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unsourced, almost certainly not intended as a joke (and even if it was, Wikipedia is not the place for such humour) and such an unfounded allegation is definitely libellous. As such I have removed the offending sentence. - -NotHugo- - (talk) 23:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Paid By Nintendo' 

message: Needs updating to reflect the post Dennis-purchase situation. - -NotHugo- - (talk) 23:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staff
Talk:Peggy Nadramia

message: I would like to point out that I'm not trying to defame Nadramia when I say that some Satanists do not approve of her leadership - that's just what seems to be the case.  Anyone who feels that the statement is out of line can feel free to edit it out...  -- Ataru
:Do you have any citations for it? Would seem less a criticism on your part if you had. 70.186.172.75 (talk) 11:44, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Portal talk:Current events/June 2005

message: 09-Jan-2008: The edit-buttons might not work at each day (the highly complex, peculiar article format has been garbled). However, each day in June 2005 really is a WP article of the form:
:::* Article name: June_1,_2005
:::* Proposed name: Portal:Current events/2005_June_1
Refer to each day, using those article names. I didn't create this design, just trying to help others work with it. -Wikid77 (talk) 15:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How to edit days

message: 09-Jan-2008: The format of this article had been a tall column wrapped as 8 words-per-line, but was changed at some point to wrap as 16 words-per-line (at 800x600 resolution screen size), reducing page length by 40% (making page seem half as long). -Wikid77 (talk) 15:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: ==What the heck am I doing removing sources?==
I was recently blasted for removing sources from [[April 2005] in an attempt to reduce the page size (I notice nobody said anything when I did it to this page a while ago). Here's what happened on my talk page:
=== What the heck are you doing? ===
What the heck are you doing to April 2005 Trevor? Month pages always have links to stop people adding in phoney unsourced stories. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 02:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You certainly shouldn't start doing something like that without putting something up on the talk page first to see if anyone has any objections. Average Earthman 12:11, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues from 2005

message: I was recently blasted for removing sources from [[April 2005] in an attempt to reduce the page size (I notice nobody said anything when I did it to this page a while ago). Here's what happened on my talk page:
=== What the heck are you doing? ===
What the heck are you doing to April 2005 Trevor? Month pages always have links to stop people adding in phoney unsourced stories. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 02:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You certainly shouldn't start doing something like that without putting something up on the talk page first to see if anyone has any objections. Average Earthman 12:11, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What the heck am I doing removing sources?

message: What the heck are you doing to April 2005 Trevor? Month pages always have links to stop people adding in phoney unsourced stories. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 02:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You certainly shouldn't start doing something like that without putting something up on the talk page first to see if anyone has any objections. Average Earthman 12:11, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck are you doing? 

message: ==1 June 2006??==
The first of June was recorded as 2006, looks like a typo to me so I'm changing it to 2005. D3av 02:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues after 2007

message: The first of June was recorded as 2006, looks like a typo to me so I'm changing it to 2005. D3av 02:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1 June 2006??
Talk:Alexander Schmemann

message: Shouldn't "The Historical Road of Eastern Othodoxy" under WORKS be "Orthodoxy"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.201.97 (talk • contribs) 31 July 2005‎
:Of course. Why didn't you fix it? Not the sort of thing that requires discussion. Holford 16:06, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fr. Schmemann was named a "mitred archpriest" by Met. Ireney of the Russian Orthodox Metropolia. In 1966, he was named "Protopresbyter of the Ecumenical Throne" by Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras, presented by Archbishop Iakovos during services at Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Cathedral in New York City.Jlmcea 22:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just one correction on the entry concerning Fr. Schmemann.  I was at the seminary as a student at the time of his passing, and he did not Italic textdie in New York City, but at his home in what was then called Crestwood, and is now called a part of the town of Yonkers.
: Sourced from NYT obit. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Romanization of Greek

message: ISO states that its tables (that his page includes supposedly as an ISO standard) are for information purposes only. It is my understanding that the standard only attempts to set a precedent for certain 'types' of systems based on what qualities transliteration/transcription systems should abide by based on certain needs they may fulfill. So the tables only seem to be examples of a system. The tables in the paper released by ISO are neither proposals nor an integral part of the international standard itself. 
Thus, I believe that a clarification in this Wikipedia article is warranted so non-expert users are less likely to be confused. Frankly speaking, I don't think I myself am qualified but perhaps someone with knowledge on the subject should look into this and write something with more validity. Thankfully that is mentioned in the Greek version of the article on [ISO 843], but non in the English one. Gnkgr (talk) 00:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questioning the inclusion of 'ISO' as a standard for romanization 

message: Wiktionary uses only the scientific romanization whereas we don't even list it and instead list three others. I think it's a very bad idea to use a different romanization than Wiktionary. Most editors will copy-paste romanizations from there. 
In addition,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Lang-grc refers to this page but doesn't explain which of the three romanizations listed should be used. 
The easiest and best solution would be to automate the process using the code at https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Template:inherited or is it https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Module:grc-translit ? --Espoo (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  chaos in romanization of Ancient Greek 

message: What is the reverse of this process called?  Is there an article about that? Should there be? Hellenization? That does not seem to be it. Rwflammang (talk) 20:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin to Greek transliteration 

message: I have again removed the un-referenced changes that  has made to this article. There are two issues with the change. One is that there are significant changes to the content of the article that aren't referenced at all. The other is that the change introduces the invocation of a reference named "betagreek", which isn't defined. This generates are ferencing error and adds the article to :Category:Pages with broken reference names. The article is already tagged for referencing problems, and new referencing issues should never be deliberately added to an article. 
(Oop! Looks like  did this reversion while I was writing here.) -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Betagreek is my Greek romanization. I just wanna fit in... BetaFromEEVV (talk) 11:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting un-referenced changes
Talk:Josefa Ortiz de Domínguez

message: To the admin eventually deleting this page: I've created a new article on the /temp page! -- Rune Welsh ταλκ 14:39, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
:Thanks for the reminder. :-) Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:38, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Category talk:Wikipedians by location

message: How the heck do I start of list for people in Saudi Arabia? Paul, in Saudi 14:40, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Saudi Arabia

message: I almost missed "Wikipedians in the Netherlands" because it's listed under T instead of N. Perhaps it's best renamed? 23:16, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now fixed this.  Silverhelm 02:55, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Netherlands

message: How about a section for Wikipedians in Earth/ISS/Space/etc? :D TimeClock871 (talk) 08:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New section
Talk:Financial market

message: Q: Definitive List of Financial Markets?
The section of this listing types of markets seems a bit odd - not quite mutually exclusive, or collectively exhaustive. For example: Futures - this type of contract is available in almost every other market type, I'm not convinced it is a separate market in itself?  richardb20  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.48.223.168 (talk) 16:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

message: Meaning 223.182.216.203 (talk) 05:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Financial market 

message: — Assignment last updated by Zefeng jing (talk) 23:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu
Talk:Outer Solar System

message: As a personal aside, not only am I not a professional (just an avid reader) astronomer, Mr. Brown is not the only one with a new addition to his family - see http://homepage.mac.com/smkolins/Adoption/adoption.html
I suppose some mention of Bode's Law (ref) also belongs and the history of Planet X(ref) as humanity has developed the idea of the Outer Solar System might have a place.--Smkolins 14:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I suppose some of it may.
SInce it's in the business of defining something that was bareluy defined before I suppose much of it could be considered new - but at the same time people do have a nebulous idea of the outer solar system, and listing things that apply to the category should be included, but perhaps the more speculative aspects should be minimized.
I'm also very new to wikipedia and still figuring out how to deal with these options. For example I have an account I think. However I don't wish to worthiness of this page to be conditioned on my unworthiness.--Smkolins 14:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  original research 

message: The debate over whether or not a stellar close pass happened a while back is picking up steam and perhaps should be noted. See http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1219/p02s02-stss.html  
The Outer Solar System is a place distinct from the general solar system which is almost completely about the Inner Solar System and or the region of the Giant Planets. It deserves it's own focus, of course linked with other regions. In the realm of these other discussions, the Outer Solar System is always a place worth only a line or two, and almost always in isolation from other comments (might talk about Oort or Kuiper Belt but not heliopause, or interstellar medium and galactic arms/clouds but not scattered disk objects....)
Additionally several parts of what are mentioned in their own right are independent of the Solar System entry. If anything they might be subsections of this article - especially once people actively take to building this one.
One thing needed is a section that speaks of the idea of "outer" expanding as originally viewing the Gas planets as far away from the inner solar system has graduated to being the middle solar system, now that we know much more about the farther regions of the solar system.--Smkolins 14:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been working on the Solar System article for some time, and have attempted to address many of your concerns. The Heliopause, Local Fluff, Local Bubble and Orion Arm are all now mentioned there, and the Outer Solar System's various constituents are each given their own paragraphs. In fact, this page contains a number of insights and references from which I feel the Solar System article could benefit, and I was wondering what you felt about merging the two. Serendipodous 15:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  it still seems a place that deserves some focus
Talk:Arsene James

message: Batch Automated Translation: Needs corrections !!! (moved from article)
I have cleaned it up somewhat and I commented out the rest of the old text.  Guettarda 15:01, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hong Kong Central Library

message: The page states that this library has been designated as a "bank library." A search of Wikipedia seems to show the term "bank library" is not used anywhere else. Anybody know what is meant by "bank library" and how we can clarify that? — Waphle 16:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a bank library?

message: It's seen that Instantnood and Huaiwei had quite a big war about the "see also" section. In fact, I quite oppose Instantnood's action in linking the page to a category page that the page doesn't belong to. However, as the previous dispute (categorizing) is not yet solved, I want to hold another vote to avoid anymore nonsense disputes of such kind in the future. Deryck C. 15:24, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Please decide what should be done

message: Support
#Deryck C. 15:24, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote: This article should be on the National Library category

message: I've removed the Hanyu Pinyin of 香港中央圖書館 from the article because I think it's too clumsy here. Leave a comment and discuss if any one of you object this. Deryck C. 08:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanyu Pinyin? 

message: I'm not digging for sourcing now, but if possible, might be nice to add some information about the public art displayed in and around the library. I noticed quite a few sculptures right around the main entrance, and surely there are more works displayed throughout the building. ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:02, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public art
Talk:Balochistan, Pakistan

message: Outdated and false information has been self-declared as WP:STATUSQUO by @Kautilya3  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahman1212 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics WP:STATUSQUO 

message: * , this is not a proper RfC question. Please see WP:RFCBRIEF. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Biased much? Part of J&K that is de facto controlled by Pakistan is shown as provinces of Pakistan. But, the part controlled by India is shown as disputed. 27.62.184.97 (talk) 13:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased Map 

message: The numbers in the districts map do not all correspond to those in the table. For instance, number 11 in the map corresponds to number 12 Kech in the table.Redav (talk) 23:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map and table numbers for districts do not correspond 

message: Is that actually attested, or where has it come from? I've removed it before, and it's been reinstated without any explanation. نعم البدل (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Balochi' spelling variant 

message: The Balochi spelling for "Balochistan" is not right in this article. The actual spelling for "Balochistan" is the same as Urdu and Persian. See the Balochistan region's article as that has been attested. EnchantedEdits (talk) 10:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balochi spelling mistake 

message: YawerMehdi12345 (talk) 09:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 12:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

text: I used this source for the exact number. M.Bitton (talk) 12:31, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 August 2023 
Talk:Mel Reynolds

message: In January 2000, the Chicago Sun-Times reported that Reynolds would work as the community development director of Salem Baptist Church in south-side Chicago and as a consultant for Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, trying to decrease the number of young African-Americans going to prison.
===Recent edits===
i'm not sure how the references are supposed to be posted, but here are a couple that i used:
t.w.
Has this guy just become the latest talking point or something?  His page keeps getting edited to bash other people/groups by association, such as Bill Clinton or the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition. Drjayphd 03:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Mark Foley scandal has some partisan Democrats trying to brand the Republicans as "the party of underage sexual scandals," so some partisan Republicans is responding by trying to cast the Democrats as "the party of underage sex scandals" (hence the edits to this article). It's just pointless partisan bickering and finger-pointing on both sides.  I hope everyone can keep an eye out for edits like what you mention and clean them up so we can maintain accuracy and a neutral point of view.--Bibliophylax 16:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i'm not sure how the references are supposed to be posted, but here are a couple that i used:
t.w.
Has this guy just become the latest talking point or something?  His page keeps getting edited to bash other people/groups by association, such as Bill Clinton or the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition. Drjayphd 03:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Mark Foley scandal has some partisan Democrats trying to brand the Republicans as "the party of underage sexual scandals," so some partisan Republicans is responding by trying to cast the Democrats as "the party of underage sex scandals" (hence the edits to this article). It's just pointless partisan bickering and finger-pointing on both sides.  I hope everyone can keep an eye out for edits like what you mention and clean them up so we can maintain accuracy and a neutral point of view.--Bibliophylax 16:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits

message: Ken Timmerman's book "Shakedown", which was published in 2002 (paperback in 2003) is cited as a reference for an event that took place after the book was published. (Mel Reynolds' unsuccessful bid to retake his House seat in 2004). 
I have blanked the citation for the time being.  Nizamarain 19:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needs to be checked