lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Said Al Nasr

message: I cannot accept this: 
* The Belgian gouvernement has traded with terrorist.  The "libération conditionnelle" in Belgium is a competance of the judicial power wich is not connected to the legislative power.  To affirm this you should take far more fiable sources such as a minister.  In this case, you must introduce the doubt in this declaration.  If he has been  freed, I can see only two causes : he has terminated his penalty or he has been anticipatively freed.  Other possibilities are not legal in Belgium.  So what is it?
* The Belgian-French family Houtekins-Kets is not a unique familiy but two families.  I cannot see the interest their nationalities.
I think you should review this article by your self and not let me do it.  
[I suggest you this reading].  
I do not want to command you but the wikipedia 's reputatuion depens on your neutral point of view.  Please think about it.  I will be glad of making your english more english.
--Ymulleneers 20:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most 1990 sources are wrong in detailing the length their captivity. The nationality is important, because the French government also negotiated with Gadaffi, some members were freed earlier then their Belgian counterparts. Intangible 15:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Martin Caton

message: Perhaps his most unfortunate action was to recommend Dr Myron Evans for a Civil List Pension; citing 'services to science'. The latter honour is accorded only to people such as Faraday. However, Dr Evans believes in 'free energy' (aka perpetual motion) and 'counterbary' (aka antigravity). He also claims that all of relativity theory is wrong, derides Hawking and says that CERN should be closed down. In other words, he is a pseudoscientist (aka crackpot); the very last sort of person who should have been proposed for the pension.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.88.246 (talk) 16:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfortunate Act 
Talk:Martin Chambers

message: Removal of skeleton infobox as per "WP:MOS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)): “The most important group to consider are the casual readers of Wikipedia, who will never do any significant editing. Infobox templates that contain many blank fields, question marks and unknowns present an unprofessional appearance, diminishing Wikipedia’s reputation as a high-quality encyclopedia.” Quis separabit? 14:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of skeleton infobox
Talk:Martin Cline

message: An editor has added the photo of a different Martin Cline. The photo is a contemporary image of a man about 40, which the subject was born in 1934 and active in the 1980s. Further, Dr. Cline does not resemble the man pictured. Dr. Cline is pictured in this 1981 New York Times article here . I am removing the image. T L Miles (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo not the subject
Talk:Vette!

message: I have uploaded LEGAL screenshots from Vette!, and they keep getting deleted. These screenshots are of fair use, and it further elaborates information available on this classic game by showing what the graphics appeared as in 1989. Please do not erase these pics...--Djbroox 03:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like you lifted them directly off of MobyGame's entry on the game.  Unless you are the originator of the screenshots (and provided them to MobyGames as well), they have to be deleted.  Unless, of course, you got permission from MobyGames to use the screen grabs (in which case, this needs to be mentioned on the image's info page). We don't have permission to use screenshots from other websites. — Frecklefoot | Talk 12:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshots

message: I distinctly remember playing a version of this game around 1994 that had full sign gantry's and much nicer graphics on an Macintosh computer.  Does anyone else remember this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modor (talk • contribs) 10:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen Vette! on a Macintosh computer. I seem to remember the traffic AI was much better on it. (In the PC version, they do not stop for you). I'm not sure if the game had color as the Mac was black and white, if I remember correctly from ten years ago. -- Guroadrunner (talk) 06:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

text: The Mac version of Vette! had different apps for colour or black and white operation. It might have been 16 colours only though, I don't quite recall. In any case, they definitely had gantries above the highways with directions on them. 130.95.13.18 (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Apple Version/Later version?

message: Maybe this is worth mention: a Sega Genesis port was planned at some point. EGM, August 1990. No info on how far development got, if it started at all. --177.207.48.219 (talk) 18:29, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genesis version 

message: *http://discmaster.textfiles.com/view/2769/TricksOfTheMacGameProgrammingGurus.iso/Information/Inside%20Mac%20Games/9307%20(July%201993)/IMG%20July%201993/IMG%20July%201993.rsrc/bin.rsrc_styl_140.rtf
JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Volfied

message: There is the wide spread cheat code on the internet. But it does not work for me. Is it the fake cheat code? The cheat code let the player get exactly 10 points and press Ecs button, then go to difficulty selection screen and scroll through the cheat mode. This does not appears to my system.
I have a copy of this game for the PC in package called Taito Legends. In that package it has three interviews one with the creator of Volified however it does not name him anywhere. There is another interview with the creator of Bubble Bobble Mr Fukio Mitsuji, looks like the same person. So I would guess that Volified was written by Mr Fukio Mitsuji. I would like to know if someone has more concrete evidence of who created the game? Richardjames13 (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here isn't a gaming forum. Ask your question in a gaming forum. זור987 (talk) 08:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zombi (1986 video game)

message: Isn't this game considered the first in a series, with the WiiU release considered it's sequel rather than an indentically titled game?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.14.134.226 (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequel?

message: ZX Spectrum = computer
Amstrad CPC = computer
Commodore 64 = computer
Amiga = computer
IBM PC = computer
Now rename the article title to Zombi (computer game).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.94.242.17 (talk) 20:53, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right; The House of Games show screenshots for the 8-bit versions, Amiga, Atari ST and MS-DOS versions. However, it says the release date for all versions was 1986, which conflicts with the information I have here (Your Sinclair review was 1990) If we can get some verified release dates, these formats can go in this article too. Marasmusine 21:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

text: That sounds more likely; 8-bit versions must've been a port of the 16-bit original and came out a year later. Marasmusine 20:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Confusingly, some sites claim the original was a 1986 Amstrad version; other sites show the Amstrad release date to be 1990. Found an article to support the 1986 release Marasmusine 15:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Wow, hi Geoff, this is a sort of honour! At some point I'll make a clarification about the original design and the ports. Sorry to hear about Steve Chance. Marasmusine 15:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Videogame?
Talk:Martin Crandall

message: Why was mention of his assault charges removed?  It had reputable sources cited.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.168.25.203 (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of material

message: I've warned  about the removal. While the information should be included here, I wish that there was more information on Crandall. The inclusion of the information puts in a little too much WP:UNDUE weight on the issue. I'd advise both of you to try to add more to the page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 00:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion
Talk:Martin Crowe

message: Should we add anything about his anti-Maori comments that he so frequently makes?123.255.55.221 05:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anything about his racism? 
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Hilary Putnam

message: Has anyone canvassed out to the people who previously objected to see if anyone has a coherent objection to the article as it now stands? - Jmabel | Talk 18:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the editors who objected, except at most one, had either withdrawn the objection or changed to support before the FAC was restarted. Gimmetrow 18:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Seasonal year

message: I am working on a year-long movie of a magnolia tree out my attic window throughout the course of the year for this article. I started August 10, 2006, and, obviously, I will be done August 10, 2007.  I am taking 1 picture every day at solar noon. David G Brault 18:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Since 10 August, the leaves on the tree have gone from being fully green, to yellow, to brown, and now, the leaves are gone. David G Brault 06:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pointless update
Talk:The Adventures of Robin Hood (video game)

message: I merged the info from Robin Hood (computer game) into this, as this has the full and correct title of the game. Porlob 18:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

message: The article states that the game cover features Kevin Costner, it does not as can be seen here. The game came out around the same time as Prince of Thieves, but was developed independently of it. --Jonathan Bishop (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince of Theieves link
Talk:Martin Day (writer)

message: i think Martin Day had a great mind on the book he wrote the Wodden heart one of my relitives useuly watch Doctors and family afairs and she says she loved every episode she saw i did my homwork on Martin Day and it was inspiering.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.224.118 (talk) 17:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My apinion of Martin Day 
Talk:Dirty Harry (1990 video game)

message: Where is the "The War Against Drugs" subtitle from if neither box cover, manual or in-game menus don't mention it? --Mika1h (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Should the article be moved to Dirty Harry (1990 video game)? Actually, the cancelled game described at Dirty Harry (video game) might not be the primary topic, so perhaps that article should be moved to Dirty Harry (2007 video game) to make room for this one? (Does the standard method of disambiguating by year still hold for cancelled games?) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 06:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subtitle
Talk:Martin Donovan

message: Martin Donovan is also going to be on this season of the Ghost Whisperer. 
Check this out:
http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff82/jclancy922/301_featured_the_underneath.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pete.manitol (talk • contribs) 18:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Among the references, there is a source that uses the site, Imdb. I think it's best to include it as an external link rather an inline citation.
See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (IMDb is user-generated). Mottshmikes (talk) 07:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be part of the external links
Talk:Martin E. Marty

message: This person recently died. I don't have time to edit the page right now, I'll try to get to it later, but I thought I should point that out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rucha58 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 
Talk:Martin F. Loughlin

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Martin Francis Loughlin was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 12:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Lightspeed (video game)

message: My game box clearly states that its from 1986. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.190.161.125 (talk) 00:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fascinating, considering my game manual says (c)1990. And the game intro screen says 1990. I can't seem to figure out where I put the box. But, I'm 100% sure it's a 1990 game.--Swaaye 09:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

text: My box also says 1990 75.0.3.249 15:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Y'all wouldn't happen to have the manual in order to post basic controls, would you? 00:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a 1990 game at all! 
Talk:Martin Fleischmann

message: * 
The only reference to Fleischmann is: "Together with Wynne-Jones, he formed a strong electrochemistry group in Newcastle which included, notably, interlia: Ron Armstrong, Willy Beck, Alan Bewick, Geoff Briggs, Ray Brown, Arthur Covington, Tom Dickinson, John Dobson, Bob Grieff, Martin Fleischmann, and Keith Oldham.". --Enric Naval (talk) 12:21, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed 1 ref 

message: “Fleischmann, Pons and the researchers who believed that they had replicated the effect remain convinced the effect is real, but the general scientific community remains sceptical.” “remain” should arguably be “remained” – Fleischmann himself is dead.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 23:50, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 
Talk:Magic Sword: Heroic Fantasy

message: I'm not a native speaker, so I'm not sure if i get it right:
The article say "last to be found", but thats not the case. I got the knight in the very beginning (around stage 10) in the game.
Misunderstanding or a need to edit this article? 16:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knight 

message: I've played the arcade game, and you can have multiple allies at once.  I was disappointed when the SNES version came out and wouldn't let you have more than one.  The article is unclear about how many allies you can have at once, but it seems to imply only one. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Allies
Talk:Martin Frankel

message: This has to be the worse article I have read. Was it prepared as a 5th grade school report by a third grader? Also, is it inappropriate to use news reports as the main source of citations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.59.249.28 (talk) 08:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly Written 

message: Ok, I've asked others to take a look at this article. IMO this article is borderline deletable per G10, it is full of BLP violations and I'm not sure if it is salvageable in the current form as it is nothing more than a book report without citations. BLP issues everywhere. It is an article I'd like to see, but in the current form, I don't know.---I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 16:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've trimmed this down to its basics... it needs to be rebuilt, but in a manner that uses reliable sources and references. There were too many BLP issues with the older version.---I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 20:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've more or less created an expanded article. It has sources, but the history still has missing sections, particularly the important parts about the actual looting and investigations of the insurance companies. --Closeapple (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP concerns 

message: While I am dubious about the whole article, his Jewish identity is a key part of his background thus belongs in the lead. If Frankel hadn't used his Jewish identity in the perpetuation of his frauds, then I would agree it isn't needed in the lead, but he explicitly identified himself as a "Jewish Genius" and a "rich Jew", thus it is meaningful and important.---I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 16:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: Tom Corbally's role in the Catholic scandal? 5.34.25.102 (talk) 04:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  corbally 

message: I want to make an "Asking for a friend" joke about this comment, but... Arrived at this article trying to figure out what was going on in some sort of TV documentary. If it isn't the same guy, then this article needs a disambiguation entry at the beginning. If it is the same guy, then I can't imagine the justification for leaving such juicy bits completely out of his Wikipedia page. The TV show was unclear about where his money came from (but it said a whole lot about where the money was going), which is why I was curious about more background information. (And I suppose I need to add a watch, too, eh?) Shanen (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same guy as the sex scandal or someone else?
Talk:Motocross Maniacs

message: Furthermore, some levels have sections that require one or more nitros to pass, making it impossible to complete the level without any. -- this is incorrect. you can press up to gain a bit of jumping height and get past those "impossible" areas. it is possible to complete the entire game without using a single nitro. this sentence should be revised.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.49.50 (talk) 00:51, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Martin Galvin

message: I have marked a section of this article as needing a NPOV check.--Vintagekits 19:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: This article does not support the text of "but was actually a front for the supply of weapons to the Provisional IRA". One Night In Hackney303 12:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: OR removed

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Martin Galway

message: Having just added Cookie to his list of games, I noticed that the references section was not done properly with , so the references listed there are not associated directly with any particular area of the text. Someone who knows about the man, please correct this? Miremare 23:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Martin Gleeson (rugby league)

message: His cousin player for the country. Will work in a citation.Londo06 09:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Martin Grainger

message: Great page on one of my favourite Birmingham players of all time. He deserved better luck than he got; he could have been England's answer to the left back problem we ahd in the '90's. Millm0w 11:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Respect 
Talk:Columns III

message: I own the Columns Arcade Collection for Sega Saturn, and Columns 3 is not on it.  Does anyone know if there's some other version/release of it that has Columns 3?  The one I own contains Columns, Columns 2, Stack Columns, and Columns 97.  If I didn't have to go in to work, I'd try looking it up now.  I'll try doing some research later today if no one else gets to it first. Kcowolf (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Martin Hattersley

message: This chap died on June 7, 2020.  https://edmontonjournal.remembering.ca/obituary/martin-hattersley-1079349370    GBC (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Passenger rail transport in China

message: I wanted to see how the new train services after the opening of the Shanghai–Nanjing High-Speed Railway show up on www.tielu.org. (I am not endorsing that site, but it just happens to be the one Chinese train schedule site that I am familiar with). As I query "上海" to "南京", the full list of trains shows up, including dozens of the new expensive G trains. The trains that arrive to Shanghai Railway Station are listed as coming to 上海 as expected. But - quite surprisingly - those trains (the majority of the G's) that I believe are going to Shanghai Hongqiao Railway Station are shown as arriving to some place called "上海东" ("Shanghai East") instead! So apparently this is how tielu.org chose to call the new Hongqiao Station... Moreover, Wuhan's two "old" stations, the Wuchang Railway Station and the Hankou Railway Station got new monikers as well - 武汉南 ("Wuhan South") and 武汉西 ("Wuhan West") respectively! (See e.g. the schedule for D3010, Wuchang - Shanghai Hongqiao, or, under tielu.org's new dispensation, "Wuhan West - Shanghai East". Now, I have used the tielu.org site long enough, and know that until quite recently Wuchang and Hankou always appeared there under their usual names, none of this "Wuhan West" / "Wuhan South" business.  A quick web search did not find anything particularly useful about this matter, other than a few people's comments on the 武汉南 label for the Wuchang Station on a discussion forum.  If anyone in the know reads this page - could he comment if this "renaming" is simply that website's own idea, or the "new" names have some official or semi-official status? If they are, we probably should indicate so in the appropriate articles. -- Vmenkov (talk) 00:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely non-sense. I suggest you use 12306.cn . Python eggs (talk) 01:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cannot access that site, although some people with pedantic tendencies stress over the municipality in which the station is based. This, in my view, is unecessary. It's similar to those who insist that all subway stations must be named something "站", even if the subway station connects to a railway station, i.e. 上海站站. I enjoy seeing "irregular names" and wondering where they're from... like when Sifang Railway Station replaced Qingdao for a brief interlude. Colipon+(Talk) 02:29, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the www.12306.cn suggestion. Their site, indeed, still describes the same D3010 as Shanghai Hongqiao - Hankou, just as one would expect... One is left to wonder, though, how tielu.org has come up with their "nonsense" designations: after all, "Shanghai East" seems a remarkably strange way to describe the Hongqiao Station, considering that it is located both west of downtown Shanghai and west of all other major Shanghai stations (including, yes, the Shanghai West Railway Station as well). -- Vmenkov (talk) 03:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New station names - "Shanghai East", "Wuhan South", "Wuhan West" - on tielu.org