lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hassan Roshdieh

message: i would like to put this picture in the page but it will not work, any help?
link
:*Kevin, I replied over on your talk page. A Train take the 14:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I do not see why it should be copywrited as 1. All images of him should be my property because I am his great great grandson and 2. The person who painted the image died well over 100 years ago, I know this because the painter was a family friend. It does not matter though, It isn't really that important. --KevinShah 02:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Smoked cheese

message: Why is cheese smoked? Isn't cheese itself a preserved food?   How does smoking change the nature of the cheese? Will it still melt the same way?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.208.61 (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: (Untitled)

message: Is it common to all or most countries or cheeses? I have seen it here in the states but I have only seen it once in Britain. Ron James 007 (talk) 18:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More common where? 

message: Should there be some mention of Churuya-san?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.158.248 (talk) 09:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nyoro~n

message: Liquid smoke usually is natural, not artificial, and contains the same flavor and color components as smoke, not food color.Gigemag76 (talk) 23:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Liquid smoke
Talk:1982 CFL season

message: I can't imagine why this article would be in the category NFL on NBC unless NBC showed CFL games due to the strike-shortened NFL season... somebody clarify this. Berserkr731 03:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nicholas

message: Article reads:
:The customary English version of spelling "Nicholas", using an "h", is derived from one way of transliterating the diacritic on the 'o' of the original Greek word Νικόλαος.
Since when is an acute accent represented by an 'h'? --Macrakis (talk) 04:24, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I traced this to an old edit from an educational-institution IP address with a history of vandalism.  Unlikely and no source, so I cut it. --Macrakis (talk) 04:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The 'h'

message: I'm a flemish person (so my native language is Dutch), and I found the variations of Nicholas for females in dutch to be quite odd. Two of them are: Klasina and/or Klazina. I had never heard of these and am 100% sure that they would not be used to give a name for a child in this day and age. I went looking for it and as it turns out these names are indeed very antiquated (which is also how they sound to my ears), being given for example as names for 12th century dutch barges. Should we remove them?
78.23.27.229 (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicholas in Dutch 

message: The disambiguation page concerns movies and places and might be incorporated into this page. I wanted to split the links to people into subcategories, but didn't do so correctly (subheadings in boldface tho higher headings in ordinary face). Please feel free to correct.Jweaver28 (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: I have added more than a dozen new articles to  that I am fairly certain are variations.  I am not sure if Nikil or Nikitas (disambiguation) are etymologically related.  Feel free to add those subjects.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New articles
Talk:The New Deal and corporatism

message: Creating this specific page Nikodemos was a great idea. --Timeshifter 03:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: .

message: :Support: A merger of text from Fascism and ideology seems like a good idea. --Cberlet 18:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: Usually it is considered good manners to wait a few days to let an actual merger discussion take place before unilaterially making the merger.--Cberlet 21:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In my mind this page is, first and foremost, a necessary page. It needed to be created. It stands on its own merits. It allows for a much fuller discussion. It is a side benefit that sections from other pages can be merged with it. --Timeshifter 23:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion

message: This page now lacks the proper context to point out that this is a very marginal view, and that few serious scholars agree with Reagan or the libertarian ideologues.--Cberlet 22:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many viewpoints concerning the New Deal and corporatism. Many are noted on the page. I believe your viewpoint is the marginal one here. That viewpoint being your seeming mission to pigeonhole this and that as being Libertarian. I humbly suggest that you ease up on this mission of yours. WP:NPOV means that the many various viewpoints are put on a page, and that readers are allowed to come to their own conclusions. --Timeshifter 00:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Marginal POV needs to be made clear
Talk:Egg carton

message: What I would like to know is whether a 6-egg carton is a different entity then 12-egg carton, or is a 6-egg carton really just a 12-egg carton cut in half?  How are 6-egg cartons produced? Do the carton producers simply create half the needed 6-egg cartons in 12-egg form, then just cut them in half? Does this create logistical problems with the labeling of cartons?
71.111.92.26 03:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How were eggs transported before the egg carton was invented? --70.167.58.6 (talk) 16:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before crates? 

message: Plastic versus paper containers for the transport of the eggs. I read that paper can biodegrade in two months buried with moisture to facilitate microbes breakdown of the paper. Plastic on the other hand takes hundreds of years to break into smaller and smaller pieces. We need references to confirm the environmental footprint of the packaging.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 17:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Environmental issues

message: An editor included punnet of eggs as the British English equivalent of egg carton. I reverted him/her because most of his/her edits weren't constructive. However, I was thinking about it and, if I recall correctly, punnet of eggs is indeed somewhat used in both the UK and Australia for describing an egg container, although in most cases I heard the word it meant a container for fruits and vegetables. Thoughts on including it? --Urbanoc (talk) 18:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punnet of Eggs
Talk:Battle of Arcadiopolis (970)

message: Philippopolis is described by Fine as being a Byzantine city at the time it was sacked. It also appears in Constantine VII's De Ceremoniis as being in the eparchia of Thrake " In Eparchia Thraciae habet metropolis Philippopolis "- and therefore Byzantine in the mid 10th century. Plus it makes more military sense for the city to have been Byzantine at the time of its sacking by Sviatoslav. Virtually all of Bulgaria was under Sviatoslav's control and he had the Bulgarian Tsar held hostage, why in this situation would a Bulgarian provincial governor offer resistance to Sviatoslav?  It makes no sense, however, if the city of Philippopolis was Byzantine at the time its resistance to Sviatoslav's forces makes perfect sense. Urselius (talk) 12:53, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippopolis
Talk:Battle before Constantinople

message: I am confused.  I am the guy who created the 2nd Arab Siege of Constantinople, and this article basically just copies it.  I have all the same information and more, in greater detail, with cited sources.  I don't understand why you felt the need to create this, as my article deals with the Bulgarian intervention quite clearly.  Please point out to me what new information this article adds to the situation. Bbcrackmonkey 22:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:William Paterson (explorer)

message: A recent good faith edit of an awkwardly phrased passage unfortunately lost the specific meaning - at this stage Tasmania (then called Van Diemens land) was part of New South Wales - but the North and South of the Island were under separate Lieutenant Governors (both responsible to the Governor of New South Wales). Thus there was actually no such thing as a "Lieutenant Governor of Van Diemens Land". Somehow this needs to be made clear - I have reverted to the (admittedly poorly expressed) original - this does actually need re-writing, but the original meaning has to remain (and if possible made even clearer) if the text is to remain accurate. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 14:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lt Governor of NORTHERN Van Diemens Land (Tasmania) 
Talk:Morava Offensive

message: In English, adjectives can be used as nouns. Thus, "the Morava Offensive" is all you need, or "Morava Offensive"---no need for the additional word "Operation" in the title.Ryoung122 10:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I understand. You can rename it again if you like, all three of them.By the way there are plenty of articles about Soviet operations in WW2 named in this way.--Avidius (talk) 14:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename is Silly
Talk:Silver Strand Beach

message: The information about the bands currently keeping the scene alive are very outdated. Missing 23rd and In Control are broken up and Arsonics aren't taken seriously.  Check Nardcore for current bands.
:I don't know much about the Nardcore music scene (aside from basic, common knowledge facts), but I do know that a Wikipedia article about Silver Strand Beach should contain a reference to it being the birthplace of Nardcore, with a link to the article about Nardcore, but the Silver Strand article should not morph into an article about Nardcore.  It isn't necessary to mention every band, lead singer, what streets they lived on and what year they lived there... that is what the Nardcore article is for.  I rewrote the Nardcore portion of the Silver Strand article to reflect that. Dcmcgov 09:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted. I edited the link on the disambig page.  Also, I don't know anything about the Navy's "SWEF" program, so although I did write the article, somebody with more knowledge of that subject matter should add it.  It could just be my ignorace on the subject, but I remember hearing somewhere that the "Surface-to-air" missile program was on the Mugu portion of the base...  If true, I dont think it has much bearing on the Silver Strand Beach article. Dcmcgov 09:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

message: There's a neighborhood of Oxnard and a state beach that share this name.  Somehow the information about the beach got spread around between three articles:
* Silver Strand Beach
* Silver Strand Beach (Oxnard, CA)
* Silver Strand (San Diego)
I'd like to see the beach info consolidated in one place. - Stepheng3 (talk) 05:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I get the impression that you think non-residents should avoid contributing to these articles.  Is that correct? - Stepheng3 (talk) 19:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

text: So you believe anything an outsides does to the article will be misguided, even it's simply adding verifiable information derived from Wikipedia:Reliable sources? - Stepheng3 (talk) 04:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger needed?
Talk:336th Fighter Squadron

message: Why does the hotlink of Lt. Col. Gifford's name in the excerpt of "The current commander of the 336th Fighter Squadron is Lt Col Taylor "Bender" Gifford." lead to Robert Dyrdek's page? Someone who seems to be utterly unrelated to Gifford and the 336th?
Expansion upon the correlation or correction is needed. 75.168.193.100 (talk) 01:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dyrdek?
Talk:352d Tactical Fighter Squadron

message: I propose merging the 652d Bombardment Squadron.  Squadrons have been merged,and 652d article remains a stub.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Which are basically WP:I just don't like it.  Clearly, the current article on the 652d falls under WP:FAILN.  There is no evidence of the unit's notability in the article, and if unsupported matter was deleted the article would evaporate. The article is little bigger than the WP:SIZERULE that would call for its merger on the basis of size alone not only does WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME call for the merger, but the merger shows the relationship between the units, which separate stubs do not per WP:NOPAGE.  Your comments on the the 622d Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron are inappropriate here -- there is no demonstrated independent notability as in the example of the 30th Bombardment Squadron and the United States Air Force Thunderbirds.--Lineagegeek (talk) 21:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue is the application of WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME to merges based on lineage. I don’t think that there is consensus on this issue (e.g. here  and ) and I don’t think that it is appropriate to continue these merges lacking a consensus. The way forward is to establish a broad consensus regarding these kinds of merges and clearly delineate it in WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME so that articles can be developed within a consensus framework based on some reasonable application of era and lineage.  --Kkmurray (talk) 02:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Battle of Southern Buh

message: In this article I can see statemenets such as
:"... and they turned to their old method for such situations: they bribed the Magyars to attack Bulgaria from the northeast."
which present a pretty strange view of history. Hiring various other nations and tribes to do your dirty work was common. Everyone did this back then. But enough about this example. Maybe this article suffers more from un-encyclopaedic writing than problems in neutrality. Jeltz talk 20:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Energetic space

message: As far as I can tell, \langle u, u\rangle_E (or sometimes the square root thereof) can represent the energy of a configuration u (at least in the area of elasticity). The thing I can't figure out is this: what does \langle u, v\rangle_E when u and v are different configurations? I have a sense of what an inner product means between functions, but not in the energy space. Any thoughts? —Ben FrantzDale 05:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning

message: I rewrote this article, primarily for style and to clarify things. I cut out the paragraph
: That is, B_E is that linear functional which acts like B but has a domain of X_E—that is, its domain includes all limit points, u, of the domain of B for which Bun is bounded as u_n\to u.
since it is not clear what norm one uses to talk about convergence and boundedness (the original norm, or the energy norm?).
It would be nice if somebody else could also take a look at how the article looks now to make sure I didn't make any typos. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. I'll fix anything I see, but when I started this page it was at the edge of my understanding (hence the  tag). Thanks. —Ben FrantzDale 02:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds good. I added a physical example. I must say physics is not my strength, I hope I got all right from Zeidler's book. Extra eyes to look over that would be very welcome of course. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite, and a question 

message: Oleg, I just had an ah-ha regarding this line of your example:
: (Bu|v)=-\int_a^b\! u(x)v(x)\, dx=\int_a^b u'(x)v'(x) = (u|Bv) 
It looks like that is saying that integration by parts is conceptually the same as distributing the metric tensor across both arguments to the inner product. Hua. —Ben FrantzDale 04:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess. I don't know what "distributing the metric tensor across both arguments to the inner product" means, but I am glad it helped you. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It just means that I never liked this: (Bu|v)=(u|Bv). If it doesn't matter which side the B goes, it seems much more symmetrical to think of it as (\sqrt{B} u | \sqrt{B} v). —Ben FrantzDale 05:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woah... Integration by parts
Talk:Shut Up and Dance (duo)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/shut-up-dance-mn0000037686/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:93rd Air-Ground Operations Wing

message: This page is overall very good... improve it a bit more, and it'll be a good candidate for A-class. However, there is an absolute need for more in-text citations. Overall references are fine, but its important to cite the important points, even if they are book/offline sources. That was the only reason why this page missed a B-class. Also, structure could be tidied up a bit. Good luck. Sniperz11talk|edits 20:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MILHIST Assessment
Talk:116th Air Control Wing

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.    --dashiellx (talk) 17:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article actually seems to have some pretty good content. The issues are with links to other wiki articles (None to speak of) and grammar (Short incomplete sentences). I'll clean these up. Not sure if you also expected more content? Marathi_Mulgaa (talk) 00:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article's content is sufficient, in my opinion.  What is really needed to improve this article are some more references and and appropriate inline citations. --dashiellx (talk) 10:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm trying to contact the US Air Force History Office to see if one of their own personnel can help with beefing up the content some more with citations, pictures, etc. Marathi_Mulgaa (talk) 22:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Another editor has added an anecdote about the trade of a B-17 of the 100th Bombardment Group for a P-47 ride.  The addition has no references, but may possibly be true.  Rust & Hess have a photograph of a B-17 with checkered cowlings on p. 81 that may be the plane referred to.  For this reason, I have not reverted the edit, but tagged it and corrected the spelling.;-) --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-17 "loaned to" 353d
Talk:Kid Gavilán

message: He was 32 when he retired - what did he do for the rest of his life ?
Did he have any family ?
-- Beardo 04:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "...Gavilan discovered that life after boxing was not easy. In the late 1950s he moved back to his homeland, anticipating a comfortable retirement. Instead, the Cuban government confiscated his 39-acre ranch, and the former fighter was effectively penniless when he returned to the United States a decade later. ... At the time of his death on February 13, [2003,] Gavilan, who had been married several times, was estranged from his family."  Andyvphil (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where did he get the name "Kid Gavilan"?69.112.90.253 (talk) 05:54, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Gavilán means sparrowhawk. KG was also promoted as "The Cuban Hawk". Andyvphil (talk) 09:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:123rd Airlift Wing

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 18:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Returned to state control, redesignated 123d Fighter-Interceptor Wing on 10 July 1952 and activated at Standiford Field; redesignated 123d Fighter-Bomber Wing ca. 1 July 1955, 123d Tactical Reconnaissance Wing ca. 1 July 1958; called to federal servie Apr 1968, etc.  While the 123d Tactical Reconnaissance Group was inactivated on 9 December 1974, redesignated 123d Operations Group and activated ca. 1 January 1993. Lineagegeek (talk) 02:56, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No lineage of 123d Fighter Bomber Wing After 1952
Talk:Dental composite

message: A similar structure as the dental amalgam page could be adopted ie: 
*description 
**composition 
**Advantages 
***Physical properties
***Longevity
***bond
***Cost
**Disadvantages
***Ease of use
***Physical properties
Bouncingmolar (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Direction

message: I feel like this should mention the safety concerns raised around BPA; this has been the subject of substantial research as discussed Polymer-Based Direct Filling Materials.: "degradation products can be toxic at the local level, but exposure to them is considered to be brief as they are quickly cleared by the saliva ... studies concluded that the cumulative exposure level to sealants and/or flowable composites was not associated with behavioral ... alteration". II | (t - c) 16:30, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bisphenol A / plasticizers discussion