lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Best of Type O Negative

message: The article mentions that this, along with other "greatest hits" releases by the Roadrunner label, were unauthorized. Unsanctioned releases such as bootlegs and demos are widely not considered part of a band's major discography. Shouldn't this and the other albums like it be taken out of the band's chronology and maybe put into a separate Roadrunner Records stub instead?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.142.137 (talk) 17:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Included in "chronology" listing?
Talk:The Big Picture (Michael W. Smith album)

message: I wasn't restoring it, I moved it from his main article to this article because it's more relevant here. Is it false? I know it's missing a source, but it sounds pretty legit to me, because I don't know why anyone would make up such a thing.--Krystaleen 11:19, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The reverse intro
Talk:The Big Room

message: In anticipation for nominating this as a good article, I have removed the following unsourced information, as I cannot find any references for it:
*The album was certified 5x Platinum in both the Phillipines and Thailand
*The album was certified 2x Platinum in Indonesia
*"Wanna Be Where You Are" was released as a promo single in the Phillipines shortly before the duo split up. Freikorp (talk) 02:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *Also removed: What You Do About Me was filmed in Krabi, Thailand and was directed by Tryan George, and was to be M2M's last music video. Freikorp (talk) 04:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed unsourced content
Talk:Limburger

message: This might deserve a mention
https://americanliterature.com/author/mark-twain/short-story/the-invalids-story
Grijalvo
--79.147.224.134 (talk) 19:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Twain 

message: Formal request has been received to merge: Herve cheese into Limburger; dated: March 2021. Proposer's Rationale: It looks like it's the same product, just listed under different names.  77.251.127.105.  Discuss here. GenQuest "scribble" 18:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Both articles are fairly short. Merging the two would make them stronger and they are quite closely related. Limburger is the longer of the two so Herve should become part Limburger, not the other way around Mrmoustache14 (talk) 04:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:The Business – the Definitive Singles Collection

message: Am I right in thinking the interview snippets come from the BBC Radio 2 "Five Years of Madness" documentary? -88.111.82.107 22:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sail Indonesia

message: I have tagged :File:Utiekah_III_-_Australia.JPG, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 00:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Utiekah_III_-_Australia.JPG]] may be deleted 

message: You should know about this and comment.  One of our editors has systematically depopulated it (from this article among many others), and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 11:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested deletion [[Category talk:Yachting races]]
Talk:The Chronicles of a Bohemian Teenager

message: Im not quite sure we should use this page to break down each song meaning.
Thats rather silly isnt it? Unless you have citations where he gives meaning we should refraim from writting our own ideas about the songs.--JJR86 17:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Bank of English

message: The article says: 
"Bank of English: The corpus totals 525 million running words as of 2005." 
Let me put it this way: oi vey!!! (could be wai di mi, should you rather go for Judeo-Spanish instead of the Yiddish so ingrained into English*. Even French, known for... long talks, does not have this many words**. English, over half a bil??? Let us be serious for a change! 
BTW, the Bank of English used to have some free services, but no more: the prices are prohibitive for most of us, and Collins dictionaries I checked do not indicate how common/obscure a word might be... Any other source? A dependable, yet free one perhaps... Rumsefardi 03:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:The Conet Project

message: I was looking for sources for the uncited statement in the lead section (The project's name comes from a mishearing of the Czech word konec, or "end", which marks the end of transmissions on the Czech numbers station) and couldn't find any to back this up, other than this article. It says "The word "Conet" is the sign-off signal on one station" but nothing about "conet" being a mishearing of the Czech word "konec". The claim in the lead seems plausible but isn't fully sourced anywhere (that I could find), but just saying that a station signed off by saying "conet" feels disingenuous when it's only mentioned in the one source. Should the whole sentence be deleted, considering it's just a small piece of information? Or just reword it to only say what's supported by a citation? IdealSalesman (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and removed it when I changed the lead. Eventually I would like to add a background section or something like that where that information can go if there is a source for it, because I think it's worth including. IdealSalesman (talk) 19:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Worth keeping?

message: The indie horror game SIGNALIS uses a sample of Three Note Oddity. Should I edit to include that? Sableisunable (talk) 04:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find a solid reputable source, I don't see why not. I'd include it in the "Legacy and sampling" section.  Superlucer (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signalis? 

message: Is there any reason that the tracks should be listed the way they are as opposed to the same way as tracks on a music album? Something like this template seems appropriate, but if there is a reason not to do it that way, that's totally fine. I am also completely fine with making the change itself, but wanted to check in first since it's a major adjustment to the page. Superlucer (talk) 19:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As I hadn't heard anything to the contrary, I have gone ahead and changed it. I kept all information that was present, except for one internal link that had no relation to these recordings. Disc five originally had no lengths in case that is a concern Superlucer (talk) 00:53, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing formatting
Talk:The Darkest Hour Is Just Before Dawn

message: what is this? like what is the The Darkest Hour Is Just Before Dawn? Like, what genre is it? I've never heard of it (and I'm into music BIG TIME), is this a garage band?? or what?? YOu need to clarify. *dream on*dance on* 23:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  sooooo???
Talk:Redland Chapel

message: I have removed the pic which claims to be from 1815 as photography didn't exist then, and its hard to think of a meaningful caption for the image without the year.  by all means put it back in with a correct year - if it does indeed come from the early history of photography that would certainly be noteworthy, with any additional details you can provide (referenced to a reliable source). Of course if it really comes from 1815 it would be spectacularly notable - Aegoceras (talk) 10:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo "from 1815"
Category talk:United States locations by per capita income

message: I've spot-checked serveral articles in this cataegory, and can't find one that has references. I think the data is coming from the Census, but can't find any links to verify the data -- or see if newer data is available. What was the specific source of these numbers? -- Mikeblas 15:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sinfonia antartica

message: In Italian, "Antartica" is correct. So if you are referring to the title of the symphony remember it's "Antartica," not "Antarctica." Thanks! --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 15:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling! 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Discuss the move here. It seems to me common practice across classical music articles that a symphony is listed as such and not by a subtitle (eg. Symphony No. 3 (Gorecki) rather than Symphony of Sorrowful Songs). Centy</font> – [reply]• contribs – 20:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Well, Górecki's Third is easier to refer to by number than by that long subtitle. In RVW's case, it seems like people are split down the middle. Anton Mravcek 21:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also not at all convinced that this is a subtitle. The work didn't even have a number until several years after it came out...up till then it was simply known as "Sinfonia antartica." And what does one do about the Copland symphonies, then? --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 00:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. --Stemonitis 16:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Allogamy

message: As it is I don't see why this isn't just merged into reproduction under a section 'allogamy and autogamy'. Perhaps it should be renamed allogamy and autogamy and expanded if the potential is there. Richard001 (talk) 09:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Alemrak (talk) 18:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Library 100 - Critical Approaches to Information Research
Talk:Atal Bihari Vajpayee Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management

message: 61.1.29.43 15:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Emil Guillermo

message: ...added, though I'm leaving notice up since there's some info it needs, such as marital status, etc. RahadyanS 02:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: The only information in the personal life section is about the subject's cousin, and is largely irrelevant to the remainder of the article. MarsInSVG (talk) 19:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life section contains irrelevant information
Talk:Vegetative reproduction

message: Is a portion of the parent separates and devalopes into a new organism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.244.206.127 (talk) 23:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  vegetative 

message: This article speaks only of plants, while i'm fairly certain it applies to many micro-organisms too (yeasts, moulds, bacteria etc.).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.224.223.91 (talk) 09:30, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it needs to be thoroughly linked to the page that is currently called Asexual reproduction. Nadiatalent (talk) 12:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  more than just plants 

message: Clonal colony is a short article and it seems to me that the subject could fit within this article. Pinetalk 10:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting a merge 

message: Hi 2401:4900:41D8:F446:0:43:1565:9801 (talk) 14:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science and  math
Talk:Fragmentation (reproduction)

message: This article was moved from fragmentation (biology) to fragmentation (cell biology). However, many fragmentation processes involve whole organs (e.g. plant stems or leaves) or specialized structures (e.g. gemmae in marchantiophyta) that are much more than just cells. Should it be moved to fragmentation (reproduction) for better accuracy? Apparently the article was renamed to disambiguate it from habitat fragmentation, but that article already exists as a separate article. The former title fragmentation (biology) now redirects here instead of being a disambiguation page, therefore currently serving no purpose. I would suggest to simplify it by moving the page back to where it was. It already contains a disambiguation link for habitat fragmentation at the top of this page, so I don't see the problem. - tameeria 15:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  biology versus cell biology? 

message: Opening paragraphs are typically newbie-friendly blocks of text that introduce the basic idea or give some background. It starts out nice but quickly turns into a train wreck that barely makes sense, even if you can follow what's going on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4C28:194:520:5E26:AFF:FEFE:8DBC (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph 

message: Really, are we going "down" to the level of philosophy begging for questions of "free will" over reproduction? weekeepeer (talk) 23:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "intentional" fragmentation

message: Few species undergo fragmentation and very few variation is produced. Shreyom (talk) 13:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disadvantages of fragmentation 

message: Fragmentation 49.145.233.105 (talk) 10:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science
Talk:Guzmania lingulata

message: Hi,
I've got a Guzmania flower that I'd like to identify. The plant tag only said Guzmania. Is this, indeed, this Guzmania lingulata?
Matiasw (talk) 11:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be Guzmania lingulata, though I can't offer complete certainty on the ID. Plantdrew (talk) 20:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identification 

message: How to take a care this plant for blooms 47.229.4.92 (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raffi
Talk:2007 Casablanca bombings

message: I think the bomb was "distributed" over the bombers clothes, not "dissimulated"203.184.41.226 (talk) 20:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Provisioning of the RMS Titanic

message: Does this topic really deserve its own article? 128.165.87.144 15:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesn't. These sources are poor. I wish I had seen the AfD. This article needs to just be deleted. Anybody mind? --John 23:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Euryarchaeota

message: Hello, I am  a part of Dr. Guisbert's Developmental Biology of Spring 2019 and I will be working on this article Wogundele (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, where are deep-sea hydrothermal vent Euryarchaeota (DHVE) and DHVE2to be placed in the taxonom? References:
* https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12275-008-0311-z DHVE
* https://search.proquest.com/openview/fec99595bcefd2dbdb67fb55b24c89ae/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=54654 DVHE
* https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=bio_fac DVHE2 
* https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00047/full DVHE2
* Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Euryarchaeota 2 including genus Aciduliprofundum}
If they are incertae sedes, shouln't they be mentioned like that?
--Ernsts (talk) 08:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVHE and DVHE2 

message: it is wrong. Read teh title.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.59.41.155 (talk) 21:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  nanohaloarchaeota is not from the phylum Euryarchaeota. It is from the NPANN 

message: There is a new article about "Methanoliparia":
: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/938382
From the oilfield to the lab: How a special microbe turns oil into gases (EurekAlert!)
How can this be included in the article (or maybe better to have a separate article for this group)?
Thanks in advance! --Ernsts (talk) 10:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Methanoliparia
Talk:Korarchaeota

message: the  karoarcheaota is a kingdom not phyla in taxonomy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.2.182 (talk) 04:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by TingGu81 (talk) 03:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: EOSC 475 Marine Microbiology Spring 2023
Talk:Djellaba

message: It's much better saying north african than berber, because Moroccan culture is mixed arabs, berbers, europeans...etc  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.49.166.177 (talk) 13:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Djellaba is not berber 

message: The Garment used for the pic at the beginning of the article has a zip up to the neck. None of mine have zips, and I have never before seen one with a zip. Same with my gandoras. The fabric looks identical to one of mine, bought about 20 years ago. My question is, do proper djellaba have zips? -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 15:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm running out of patience ! -Roxy  the grumpy dog. wooF 21:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No they do not come with a zipper . It’s true that designers nowadays are introducing new elements to the traditional clothing however it’s not common to wear a djellaba with a zipper by neither men nor women.  Mr bott1 (talk) 09:43, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question for experts 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.com/books?id=tiEvBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA101". Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  M.Bitton (talk) 13:29, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:List of Swedish ice hockey champions

message: We need to explain how the playoffs were played the variouus years since there has been a wide varity of playoff forms. --Krm500 15:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: I feel like this this article should be merged with Le Mat Trophy. Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 22:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Swedish ice hockey champions are the one who won the Le Mat Trophy, which is: Swedish Ice Hockey Championship between 1922 (trophy not awarded until 1926) and 1951, Division 1 play-offs/second round between 1953 and 1975 and Elitserien/SHL playoffs since 1976. Not winners of all different competitions ever taking place in Sweden as User:Djln has added. Please see //Smartskaft (talk) 00:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criteria
Talk:Yuquan Shenxiu

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 15:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I can't agree with the edits on this page by Dsantayana. I feel they do not have a NPOV. I do not know what "some fierce crushing aided by the regime on Dharma succession." means. I also do not agree with "which was replaced by Chinese monism to entertain its egalitarian social thinking." This is a subjective POV. While China may not have a "cast[e]" system, it is still very hierarchical and there has traditionally been little mobility for the masses and very little egalitarianism.
Furthermore, "The destroy of Shenxiu's teaching was done during the period." is not true. There is considerable current academic thought that much of the Platform Sutra was based on (if not actually written by) Shenxiu and his teaching. Hence, I wrote: "The influence of Shenxiu’s teachings on subsequent Chan doctrine and practices is still a somewhat open question." to leave the question open as it is not absolutely certain what his influence on later Chan was although there is little doubt that he did influence the Southern School and hence, all subsequent Zen. Yanagida Seizan wrote: "The Southern School is predicated on the Northern School. Without the Northern School there could not have been any Southern School" (McRae, 1986:338 n.291) Shenxiu's teaching was not "destroyed".
Could someone point me to a reference to Shenxiu's "Traces of Dualism in his moral cosmology"? 
The decline of the Northern School as a separate entity in the history of Chan is far more complex than Dsantayana makes out. These are complicated questions fraught with myth, politics and uncertain documentation. I suggest great care be taken so as not to mislead readers who are unfamiliar with the topic.
I would appreciate some feedback as to whether others believe that these edits are inappropriate.
thank you
Thinman10
As no one has commented on my comment above, I've taken the liberty of removing some additions which I believe do not have a neutral point of view.
Thinman10 06:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: latest edits
Talk:Solar Lodge

message: The current OTO, "The Caliphate," does not recognize Solar Lodge as having anything to do with the OTO. Of course, Solar Lodge was viable and active long before there was any interest by Grady McMurtry, the "Caliph."
:Solar Lodge was never anything to do with Ordo Templi Orientis, and I will update the article to correct the inference that it was --Rodneyorpheus (talk) 15:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:The Corinthian (novel)

message: * The plot summary describes the protagonist as "an accomplished Corinthian". My rough sense of Corinthian in this usage is a fashionable amateur sportsman and gamester, involving boxing, horsemanship, and cards. But it needs to be linked to a page discussing this terminology, or defined in the text. I'm loath to do it without getting confirmation from someone more familiar with the usage that my sense is correct. Anybody? --Lquilter (talk) 15:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corinthian
Talk:Manjil Virinja Pookkal

message: I have deleted the reference to a Korean remake of the movie because it lacked any sources. I tried checking imdb with the names of the actors and the name provided, but I couldn't find any reference to such a movie.Philker (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Korean remake
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Toronto Transit Commission subway map

message: Yep, lots of people don't have pdf readers or the network speed to download one, or the computer speed to view such a complex map, or need to do strange things like search for a subway stop in a pdf, which I haven't been able to do in the past. Article deletions are always fun when they don't bother to include the creator. -- Sy / (talk) 15:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)