Talk:Britney Spears discography/Archive 2

message: This article gets far too many unsourced changes, or changes contrary to sources, even from registered users. If even registered editors keep changing numbers without providing new sources, I am inclined to fully protect this article, and then anyone who wants to change any number will need to present a supporting source on this talk page and ask for the change with . Gimmetrow 15:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Another change , after prompting, got a source . The source is http://www.britney.com/us/biography. (Note that when edits refer to "official website", some may understand that to be http://www.britneyspears.com/ - which is another reason editors really really need to provide urls when changing numbers.) Anyway, since this article doesn't copy many other items from the britney.com bio, is the britney.com bio going to be considered the reference point for everything on this page? Some things? What? Gimmetrow 07:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced changes 

message: In the office page in wikipedia of the first single of her album "Circus" is written that Womanizer has been certified gold in France... so... why in the page of the discography is not written this? And why in the single toxic are?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.46.195.176 (talk) 00:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The single "Womanizer" has sold 121,990 units which is enough to meet the requirement of Gold certification for singles, but has not yet been certified by SNEP due to not having received the fee from the French record company which releases Spears' records there. You can verify French certifications though the following sites, 1, 2.--Harout72 (talk) 02:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Certificacion of Womanizer in France 

message: Someone is putting the digital download peaks in France as the official chart peaks. This Needs to be fixed. Gimme More (#5) and Womanizer (#1) are the only songs that charted in France after Do Somethin'.  Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.57.143.15 (talk) 02:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart peaks in France 

message: Source (is German) : http://www.britneyland.de/news/?id=10357&archive=2010_01&page=3&sid= --Smolu (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Single Collection : Platin for Brazil 

message: The album Baby One More Time made number 2 in the United Kingdom in 2000, can this be amended on the discography as it shows number 4 which was its peak in 1999.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.121.227 (talk) 23:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby One More Time 

message: Double Platin for 3 / Gold for The Singles Collection in Kanada
Source : http://www.cria.ca/goldplat.php  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smolu (talk • contribs) 01:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold / Platin Britney Spears 

message: the album has been confirmed by britney.com so...
should we put it in the albums section as TBA ?
please answer:)
http://www.britney.com/us/blog/new-music-questions-answered
--GenieOFbritney (talk) 16:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Unreleased albums don't go in discography articles.—Kww(talk) 19:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britney Spears 7th studio album 

message: Why is this page using britney.com as a source?
FIRST OF ALL: the sales and certifications are outdated
SECOND: those sales only count the certifications shown there
THIRD: some certifications are fake and/or do not match with real certifications...
so why do we use it as a source?
PLUS, people refer to it as an official page, while it is not! It's is her record label page...while britneyspears.com is the official britney page.
britney.com says that the album ...Baby one more time sold 22 million copies, while britneyspears.com, her OFFICIAL site says over 25 million...
we should use other sources than britney.com, because it is not reliable at all, but when i try to change the source, a known christina aguilera fan that I'm not mentioning now lowers sales to what britney.com say...I am just saying that we shouldn't use britney.com as a source.
--GenieOFbritney (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do... 

message: the album Blackout has sold over 3.1 million copies worldwide. http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/videogaga/10234/britneys-27-most-memorable-moments/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/nov/28/britney-spears-circus this two sources say it. But people keep lowering it to 2.5 million using jive records page, which had an article from January 2008 saying 2 million, now the article has been deleted. They also use an old biography from Spears, that says 2 million and is based in that jive records article from 2008. The album has been for nearly three years and sold 2 million on its first two months of release, according to IFPI.
So, don't lower sales again please, Blackout sold over 3.1 million copies and there are sources to confirm it. The one who is lowering Blackout sales and putting two fake sources/links should stop doing it. Thanks. --GenieOFbritney (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackout sales... 

message: in this video, Britney Spears says she was busy selling "fifteen" million copies, referring to his previous album "Britney." Leaving Britney's own mouth, we can consider that "Britney" has sold fifteen million copies!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3x62BRgjaM 
(on 2:53)
:No, we can't.  And YouTube is not a reliable source for this.  Please see WP:RS. - eo (talk) 21:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Britney" sales 

message: youtube is not a reliable source, get real.
According to Forbes (a real reliable source) among other sources, britney sales are like that in the present:
Baby one more time: 22 millions; Oops I did it again: 17 millions; Britney: 9 millions; In the zone: 8 millions; Blackout: 2.5 millions; Circus: 3.5 millions
According to Forbes, brit has sold more than 63 millions, those are tha updated sales. 
Not because we are fans, we have to inflate sales come on. I'm a huge britey spears fan, but facts are still facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.216.196.149 (talk) 21:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be realistic and stop inflating sales 

message: Hi, At the time, i thought the re-direct was a good idea as discogs was the only source we could find. I always knew it was real as i own a copy of the CD Single. But now, there are reliable sources confirming the singles release. The Music Charting Industry confirms that the CD Single was released worldwide on 15 September 2009. Also, it states that it was released worldwide, not just in Australia. If you look at "3" on that site, it states the pacific countries where it was released. It tells you where the CD Single was released and the EP was released. However, on the Unusual You CD single, it doesn't give a pacific area, which means it was released worldwide. I think that giving one for the most reliable sources on the net, that Unusual You can be a single on Wikipedia. Is it possible to put it back up? Thank - You--Apeaboutsims (talk) 02:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual You Is a confirmed single 

message: i added it, but people will delete it probably because they don't see it as reliable...but i hope it is not deleted.  --GenieOFbritney (talk) 20:57, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual You Is a confirmed single 2 

message: Britney's only had three number one singles on the Billboard Hot 100....Baby One More Time, Womanizer, and 3...why are there WAAAAY too many #1s listed under her single's chart?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.81.111.160 (talk) 06:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billboard ranking for singles 

message: Blocked this article, Excess of Vandalism & constant changes without any bases or source!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franklin121189 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blocked this article 

message: The sales of the albums are totally wrong. Please change it. According to Sony, Germany, Britney has sold so much:
Baby One More Time: from 1999 until the end 2009: 28,150,000 (Germany: 1)
Oops I Did It Again: from 2000 until the end of 2009: 22,310,000 (Germany: 1)
Britney: from 2001 until now 15,620,000 (Germany: 1)
In The Zone: from 2003 until now 11,250,000 (Germany: 2)
Greatest Hits: 5,950,000 (Germany: 4)
In The Mix: 541,000*
Blackout: 3,120,000* (Germany: 10)
Circus: 4,520,000* (Germany: 9)
Single Collection: 652,000* (Germany: 85) 
Baby One More Time: 9,350,000* (Germany: 1)
Sometimes: 3,452,000* (Germany: 6)
Crazy: 4,210,000* (Germany: 4)
Born To Make You Happy: 3,684,000* (Germany: 3)
From The Bottom Of My BRoken HEart: 1,085,000* 
Oops I Did It Again: 5,912,000* Germany: 2)
Lucky: 3,921,000* (Germany: 1)
Stronger: 3,541,000* (Germany: 4)
Don´t Let Me Be The Last To Know: 815,000* (Germany: 12)
I´m A Slave 4 You: 3,315,000* (Germany: 3)
Overprotected: 2,050,000*
Not A Girl: 2,150,000* (Germany: 10)  
I Love Rock´n Roll: 720,000* (Germany: 7) 
Boys: 540,000* (Germany: 19)
Anticipaiting: 25,500*  
Me Against The Music: 5,310,000 (Germany 5)
Toxic: 5,410,000* (Germany: 4)
Everytime: 4,150,000* (Germany: 4)
Outrageous: 145,000*
My Prerogative: 1,150,000* (Germany: 3)
Do Something: 812,000* (Germany: 18)
Someday: 154,000* (Germany: 22)
And Then We Kiss: 54,000*
Gimme More: 3,380,000* (Germany: 7)
Piece Of Me: 2,541,000* (Germany: 7)
Break The Ice: 1,250,000* (Germany: 25)
Womanizer: 6,541,000* (Germany: 4)
Circus: 5,510,000* (Germany: 11)
If You Seek Amy: 2,010,000* (Germany: 36)
Radar: 765,000*
3: 3,152,000* (Germany: 18)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scandalbro (talk • contribs) 05:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please change the album sells 

message: You read that right! 
hollywoodnews.com has written an article claiming that Britney Spears has sold over 100 million copies worldwide! Quote: "The Recording Industry Association of America has announced that Spears has officially sold over 100 million records" 
"Spears sold more than 28 million copies of her debut album, “Baby One More Time,” and has sold over 20 million copies with her second album, “Oops!… I Did It Again.”" 
Baby One More Time has sold over 28 million! So lets change that! ;) 
Source: http://www.hollywoodnews.com/2010/07/19/britney-spears-officially-sells-over-100-million-records/, http://www.hollyscoop.com/music/britney-spears/britney-spears-best-selling-artist-of-the-decade_2226.aspx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.231.13.224 (talk) 10:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are not reliable and refutable sources, just celebrity gossip sites, so we won't be changing anything.--PeterGriffin  • Talk  17:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britney has sold over 100 million records according to RIAA. 

message: Official confirmation of a CD single release here. Then we have a video game franchise report that Unusual You managed to peak at No.19 on the ARIA Physical Singles Chart (a chart of music based on CD Single purchases) in October 2009. Since it charted on the other charts as well, it should have an article. Especially if "Unusual You' manged to reach 19 on the ARIA charts.--Apeaboutsims (talk) 02:43, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual You (again) WITH SOURCE'S 

message: Can anyone tell me why is Netherland included in the charts peaks for both albums and singles?
I mean, it's not a reliable country for Spears sales and it's not a big market.
I think that it should be removed from the list. Thanks.
Or at least please explain me why it should be there. --GenieOFbritney (talk) 22:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well why not? It has a bigger market than Switzerland, Ireland and New Zealand! Plus, it is a reliable country for her, more so than Japan.AtomicMarcusKitten (talk) 22:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Her sales and peaks are not good there, how can it be a reliable market for her? And Japan is a big market, and more reliable than the Netherlands, talking about Spears.--GenieOFbritney (talk) 14:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So what if her sales and peaks aren't good there, that's not being very fair... NZ and IRE are smaller markets, and japan is less reliable that the Netherlands... Anyway, say another country that could go in?AtomicMarcusKitten (talk) 16:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: removing a country for the pure reason of her chart peaks aren't as good as somewhere is an invalid reason and it's WP:UNDUE. discogs are meant to show an artists performance across a range of varied markets, not just her best performing ones. and the sources and charts in the netherlands are 100% reliable. 82.44.8.187 (talk) 20:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankyou! :P It's clear this person is just a huge britney fan and trying to make her look amazing! AtomicMarcusKitten (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:DISCOGSTYLE: "a good rule of thumb is to go by the relative success of the artist on that chart." Per this guideline, poor chart performance is valid reason for exclusion. Yves (talk) 21:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yer, but its also based on the size of the market! And i don't know what the f*ck either of you's are on about... She was very successful there, its only recently she's gone downhill... it's staying :) Unless you can think of a better country... Jeeez.AtomicMarcusKitten (talk) 21:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

text: OMG!!!!!! Whatever! Let's get someone more experienced to have this discussion, not a bios britney fan, an air head and me! (Although, i am the best and most reasonable here) ;) AtomicMarcusKitten (talk) 14:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to join the pre-existing discussion here. Yves (talk) 14:54, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm ok thanks, i have better things to do with my life... Have a good life.AtomicMarcusKitten (talk) 15:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please tell me... 

message: i checked the source given, it didnt say anything about the album going gold, i even went on the RIAA database and it didnt have blackout logged at all, meaning it wasnt certified, now i understand at those sales (like 900,000+ right?) it should have gone gold in the US, but we are not ones to give out certifications based on what we think.
it looks like this article could be run by just another crazed britney fan, but upon reading the above discussion of someone trying to just put all her highest charts in i see that you people actually care about the quality and fairness of this article i suggest it could be removed or if it did go gold, put a serious and reliable source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.40.150 (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackout Gold? 

message: Please add back the text that mentions Britney as the best selling teenage artist.
Source (picture, GWR):
http://britneyspearsblackout.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/guiness-2.jpg
ps. this discussion page could benefit from some clean-up.
--213.100.49.241 (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BEST SELLING TEENAGE ARTIST? 

message: What the hell happened to this article? In the last weeks it transformed into a crap list. The lead has been ruined, the formatting has been altered and changed. Seriously, what went down. This needs to be regressed back to its form 1 month or so ago. I wanted to work on it and upgrade to FL, but in its current state, it would take many hours.--CallMeNathan  • Talk2Me  05:13, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Britney Spears discography's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "criasales":
From Piece of Me: 
From Gimme More: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:57, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Britney Spears discography]] 

message: For the record,
Britney Spears has sold 100 million albums, and has been certified by the appropriate recording industry companies who chart such progress.
This is a completely reliable source, since Billboard is the main outlet that provides information for music in America and throughout the world!!!
http://www.billboard.com/news/britney-spears-affairs-to-remain-under-control-1004118430.story#/news/britney-spears-affairs-to-remain-under-control-1004118430.story
Also the Internet Movie Database Bio for Britney:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005453/bio
And to be even more convincing here are as many sources as I can find that say she has sold 100 million albums. Why would multiple sites post the same thing, yet not be held as credible? These many websites, blogs, and news pages cannot make up the same information.
http://www.imusicdaily.com/music-news/britney-spears-has-officially-sold-over-100-million-records/
http://www.mtv.co.uk/artists/britney-spears
http://www.pynkcelebrity.com/archives/50372
http://www.sortmusic.com/_b/britney-spears,len.html
http://www.mcarchives.com/index.asp?id=9512
http://www.hollyscoop.com/music/britney-spears/britney-spears-best-selling-artist-of-the-decade_2226.aspx
http://www.theprophetblog.net/britney-spears-100-million-sold
http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/49037242.html
http://www.hollywoodnews.com/2010/07/19/britney-spears-officially-sells-over-100-million-records/
http://popgoestheweek.com/2010/07/20/britney-spears-reaches-the-100-million-mark/
http://www.poorbritney.com/blog/living-legend-etc/
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Britney%20Spears&defid=4167597
http://www.novafm.com.au/article_britney-spears-sells-over-100-million-albums_102910
http://best-damn-blog.blogspot.com/2010/07/britney-spears-reaches-100-million.html
http://tprone.com/britney-spears-songs-biography-pictures-discography-images-height-wiki-age/
http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2010/11/new-britney-spears-album-coming-in-early-2011/
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/britney-spears-tweets-upcoming-album-details-2151329.html
http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/britney-spears-new-album-out-early-2011-says-producer_1179471
All these sources seem to prove that she has sold 100 million albums. And if you include singles it is at least 140 million.
So please change this because her label has been wrong for years, which may not seem to make sense, but record labels only pay for certifications. It is not their job to tally every one of their artists' sales. That is left to compiling industries, such as Nielsen SoundScan, the IFPI, and the RIAA.  
Even the certifications already confirmed and posted on wikipedia are much closer to 100 million than 67. And check out these other wikipedia links that also prove album sales far greater than 67 million:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Britney_Spears
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_selling_music_artists
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_album_copies_has_Britney_Spears_sold
Plus when she went on tour in 2009 and when she released the Singles Collection her label put out similar press releases as the one yesterday, and wikipedia ignored those so why be any different now. All of them were and are incorrect. Could you reply so I know that they were changed? 
THANK YOU!!!!
Pantages11 (talk) 04:47, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britney has sold 100 million albums!!! Please realize this 

message: --91.154.102.95 (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackout US certification 

message: please add hold it against me, brit's new single. + her new album title ain't confirm yet... thks...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.20.163.202 (talk) 10:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hold it against Me 

message: It's already been discussed that this is an official single. Please move to the singles section, as I don't want to mess it up, like I have in the past. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 03:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Anticipating]] 

message: Why are the sales figures for "Britney" and "In The Zone" missing??
213.103.212.184 (talk) 22:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Aparently they are saying Live Nation and Britney's official website is not reliable :/
Anyway, everyone knows In the Zone sold 10 million worldwide, and Britney 12 million.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GenieOFbritney (talk • contribs) 16:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT HAPPENED TO WW SALES OF "BRITNEY" "ITZ"??? 

message: --91.154.96.195 (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither was correct, RIAA has not issued Gold or Platinum for Blackout. I removed both. You should, by the way, sign after your comments not before.--Harout72 (talk) 16:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

text: The record company would have to pay the required fee in order for RIAA to issue a Gold certification for Blackout. The record company will possibly wait out and pay the fee once the album passes the 1 million mark and get RIAA issue a Platinum certification instead of paying one fee for Gold and another fee when it reaches a Platinum status.--Harout72 (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  certification.... 

message: There are no any sources of realise "That's Where You take me" and it doesn't belong to "Britney Spears singles" template. Why is it in her discography? --Vinokurov Demis (talk) 14:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "That's Where You take me" belong to other singles? 

message: Can someone dig up another picture? I think someone who changed it did it on purpose, and because it's ugly. That is not fair. I am sure there are many non licensed photos to use for a different photo. It's so ugly, someone change it. 
Don't want to wait, I want it now. n-n-n-n-now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.1.139.211 (talk) 22:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main picture 

message: Uhh why is it listed as 2nd single? The only source that says that is MTV.com, but I won't rely on that since they post a lot of crap. Please wait for an official announcement!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.119.31.102 (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inside Out 

message: Unusual You was No. 80 in the USA, it charted but is marked as a non-charter!
Me Against The Music was No. 5 in Germany, not No. 11 source--79.216.220.28 (talk) 23:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some mistakes 

message: This should make a note of the only featured song she was on, "Crazy" by Kevin Federline from his album Playing with Fire.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.100.157.43 (talk) 00:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured songs

message: looking on the german version of Wikipedia it states baby one more time Album 28,000,000 Oops...I did it again Album 20,000,000 Britney Album 12,000,000 In the Zone Album 10,000,000 Blackout Album 3,100,000 and Circus Album 4,500,000. Greatest Hits: My Perogative 5,000,000 B in the Mixes 3,000,000 and The singles Collection 1,300,000 as her World wide sales, why are these not shown? and why do people keep deleting the sales of britney and in the zone. reliable sorces are nill as they can add on or take off what they want when they write and artical, surely you can trust another wiki site.
also add on her world wide single sales. by the german wikipedia it sates: Baby One More Time 9.145.000 1999 Sometimes 3.902.000 You Drive Me) Crazy 4.192.000 Born to Make You Happy 3.673.000 From the Bottom of My Broken Heart 1.000.000 Oops!… I Did It Again 5.995.000 Lucky 3.914.000 Stronger 3.532.000 Don’t Let Me Be the Last to Know 800.000 I’m a Slave 4 U 2.926.000 I’m Not a Girl, Not Yet a Woman 2.020.000 Overprotected 2.020.000 2002 I Love Rock ’n’ Roll -- Boys (The Co-Ed Remix)(featuring Pharrell Williams) -- Me Against the Music(featuring Madonna) 5.360.000 2004 Toxic 5.355.000 Everytime 4.118.000 Outrageous -- My Prerogative 1.000.000 Do Somethin 700.000 Gimme More 3.300.000 Piece of Me 2.500.000 Break the Ice 1.029.000 Womanizer Circus 6.500.000 Circus 5.500.000 Shattered Glass 160.000 If U Seek Amy 2.000.000 Radar 800.000 3 3.500.000 Hold It Against Me 2.100.000+
Mikala19 (talk) 15:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. The German Wikipedia uses very unreliable sources for worldwide sales (Mediatraffic, Fansites). We can't add that. Novice7 (talk) 16:02, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britney spears single and album sales 

message: record sales are the artists total singles and albums sales britney therefore has sold over 170 million albums and singles [records] not 100million like this page says 70million is a big difference. to be more precise it is 173,940,000 albums and single AKA records Change it Mikala19 (talk) 15:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record sales 

message: Me Against The Music was number 5 in Germany, what makes you people think to change it to 11? Here even a source:
http://www.musicline.de/de/chartverfolgung_summary/title/SPEARS%2CBRITNEY+FEAT.MADONNA/ME+AGAINST+THE+MUSIC/single  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amare135 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  STOP MAKING FALSE CHANGES 

message: Why is the US Pop chart listed here. First of all airplay charts are not suggested to be used in discography, and second of all they are usually used in cases where charts are needed, Spears is a worldwide artist, so this chart shouldn't be here. Candyo32 18:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. They should only be listed for artists who fail to receive much attention on the other more notable Billboard charts like the Hot 100. The question is, what should it be replaced with? I suggest maybe Italy, Japan, or Spain, with Italy as my top choice. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 18:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, do you know what chart was listed there before a user boldly put the pop chart there? Candyo32 18:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the history, it looks like nothing was there before the Pop songs. It was just added. However, I still believe we should add Italy, since it is a major world music market and just about all her singles since You Drive Me Crazy charted on it. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 19:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine I think. Candyo32 19:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be removed, and there doesn't need to be another region listed as there are currently eleven and should only be ten. Yves (talk) 15:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: US Pop

message: I did it! I got and I'm so happy... I wanna ask to someone put the Featured Article link (Link FL|pt). The Britney Spears discography is now Featured article in Lusophone Wikipedia. Diegoftq2 (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: . Yves (talk) 16:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Article in Portuguese 

message: I'm pretty sure "That's Where You Take Me" is a single. The source listed doesn't seem to be reliable, as articles on the same website also claim that "Cinderella" and "Bombastic Love" were also released as singles. If any of these songs were released as singles, wouldn't they have been included in some versions of The Singles Collection? Akcvtt (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It received the same type of release "Anticipating". That song isn't in The Singles Collection either, does that make it not a single as well? Both songs received a very small release, which is probably why it wasn't included. Why would her label include a song that never charted on an album of #1s? ℥nding·start 23:53, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "That's Where You Take Me" is not a single 

message: It should be added to the discography!
Now listed as featured artist on "S&M," Spears earns her fifth Hot 100 No. 1 and second this year, following her own "Hold It Against Me" in January. She had previously reigned with her debut single "...Baby One More Time" in 1999 and returned to the summit with "Womanizer" (2008) and "3" (2009).
http://www.billboard.com/#/news/rihanna-s-s-m-reigns-on-hot-100-lady-gaga-1005144922.story  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GenieOFbritney (talk • contribs) 17:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  S&M featuring Britney is #1 

message: Please include those missing chart positions:
They are all for the US...
I'm Not A Girl... No. 102 (2 on Bubbling Under)
Boys No. 122
My Prerogative No. 101
Up n Down No. 110
Thank You ;) ! --79.216.168.84 (talk) 00:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing chart positions 

message: It was posted but somebody removed it. Britney Spears is officially listed as a featured artist in the Billboard Hot 100 #1 song, S&M. As such, this single should be included on the 'as featured artist' table. You can see the song in the chart with Britney's name here: http://www.billboard.com/#/charts/hot-100. 
If people are confused as to why Britney deserves credit for the remix, Billboard officially decided she should get the credit because her version outsold Rihanna's more than two to one (among other reasons). See: http://www.billboard.com/#/news/ask-billboard-britney-spears-rihanna-hits-1005150552.story.
Alternatively, the Billboard article that discusses this as her fifth no. 1 is here: http://www.billboard.com/#/news/weekly-chart-notes-rihanna-katy-perry-paul-1005148452.story.
Please recognize that regardless of how you feel about Britney, the article is supposed to display official chart positions which (as seen in all three of the reliable sources I've quote) mantain that S&M Rihanna feat. Britney Spears is no. 1.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.211.170.182 (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The song is already in the discography. Yves (talk) 22:27, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Some people keep deleting S&M from Britney's discography, she got the credit for the song and we should keep it there. It is part of her discography, I really don't understand why they remove it.--Albes29 (talk) 08:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously, S&M should be listed as one of Britney's singles 

message: Till The World Ends debuted at No. 27 in Germany source--79.216.180.169 (talk) 18:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germany 

message: On RIAA's website it's listed that it was certified gold twice, doesn't that mean it's platinum?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amare135 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxic Certification 

message: Could someone please change the certifications for 'Femme Fatale' to the following;
US: Platinum
Canada: Platinum
UK: Gold
France: Gold
Mexico: Gold
Czech Republic: Gold
Brazil: Gold
Korea: Gold
Singapore: Gold
Here is the proof in this link; http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/news/a317211/britney-spears-femme-fatale-goes-platinum.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlieStockwell (talk • contribs) 11:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thing is we need this info from the official certifying agencies around the world, not third party ones like her website etc. Also, just to point out a quick error, she is not the only female artist with 6 #1 album, Mariah Carey and Janet Jackson share that record, with Madonna with 7 and Barbra with 8 #1s. So that goes to show the can't be too reliable.--CallMeNathan  • Talk2Me  11:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  FEMME FATALE CERTIFICATIONS 

message: i checked their database, it hasnt gone platinum, so take it off!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.100.30.46 (talk) 22:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Removed. Novice7 (talk) 04:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackout hasnt got a platinum certification from RIAA 

message: In the chart of all of Britney's singles, please add a note under the "Till the World Ends" single that "the sales of 'The Femme Fatale Remix' have also been counted for it" because it is counted in this way on the Billboard Hot 100.
: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Can you provide a link to a page that confirms specifically that the Billboard Hot 100 counts these songs this way? —Tim Pierce (talk) 14:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done —Tim Pierce (talk) 14:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from M1995ahmad, 15 May 2011 

message: I wanna go reached No. 138 in the UK... Source is every chart page that shows the complete top 200! --79.199.26.49 (talk) 21:30, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Wanna Go 

message: IWG reached No. 13 in the USA. (source= Chart Watch)
Please include that and also leave a short message here so I see that you noticed this message! --79.199.20.226 (talk) 01:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Wanna Go 

message: firstly stop changing sales. in the zone is 10 million im not sure if the source i have used is a reliable one but it was 10 million for years and then some idiot changes it. stop deflating sales! secondly my baby one more time source for the gardian news paper is reliable. it was there with 26 million for ages then someone knocks it down to 25. stop doing that as if you read the article the states "shifting only 3.1m copies worldwide. To put it into some kind of perspective, that's 22.9m fewer than her debut album sold." simple maths shows that 3.1 million + 22.9 million = 26 million. so please can people not deflate it to 25 million as it is 26 million with a reliable source 
Mikala19 (talk) 19:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  baby one more time and in the zone 

message: Femme fatale has sold over one million copies in the U.S and over three million worldwide. So please change it and add world sales as well  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickbykov (talk • contribs) 16:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Source please. Novice7 (talk) 16:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Femme fatale sales? 

message: Can you add And Then We Kiss to the "Singles" section instead of "Promotional singles". And Then We Kiss was released as the leadsingle from B In The Mix: The Remixes October 31, 2005 in Australia and New Zealand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.249.94.53 (talk) 17:49, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't sent to the radio, so it's a promo--demistalk 10:33, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add [[And Then We Kiss]] 

message: 2x Platinum in AUS http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupageshttpwww.aria.com.auSINGLEaccreds2011.htm --93.229.109.24 (talk) 20:45, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done by other editor. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 02:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Till The World Ends 

message: Change it back to its original state you stupid pressed gaga cunts! Go ruin your mother cunster's discography page. This needs to be locked.
:This is Wikipedia, not Pulse Music Board/ATRL/etc. Please be civil and refrain from making personal attacks. Extraordinary Machine (talk) 02:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF? can this be changed back and left the fuck alone. 

message: The US certifications are all missing for these. I believe Womanizer should be 3x Platinum. (3,298,000) sold in the US. 3 also went 2x Platinum (2,225,000). Hold It Against Me (1,520,000), Till The World Ends (2,638,000) and I Wanna Go went Platinum with 1,592,000 million copies sold in the US. <http://www.billboard.com/#/column/chartbeat/ask-billboard-what-are-britney-spears-best-1007232152.story?page=1>
Please make these changes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.131.6 (talk) 06:28, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Certifications aren't automatic; record companies have to apply for them. "I Wanna Go", for example, may have sold enough copies to qualify for a platinum certification, but it isn't a "platinum single" until the RIAA says it is. Extraordinary Machine (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles Certifications: Womanizer, 3, HIAM, TTWE, and I Wanna Go 

message: I would double check the numbers for those. and Criminal as well, sold music videos more than the single. So it might've gone Platinum...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.131.6 (talk) 06:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  about Singles Certifications 

message: * World: 60,000,000[28]
    * US: 22,000,000[29]
these figures are pure bullshit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.208.185 (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby One More Time Sales 

message: The Femme Fatale page on Wikipedia lists Femme Fatale Sales in the US at about 1,000,000 which is currently more than the sales listed on the Britney Spears Discography page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.190.156 (talk) 06:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Femme Fatale Sales 

message: neither the Opps I did it again compilation album from 2012 or the baby one more time: rarities album from 2012 are real could they be deleted as it is just a fan making fake ones to try and make money/ that is what they want. Britney would announce this on her website/twitter and she hasn't and I'm sure once her label finds out these fake ones have been created they will be removed off Amazon or someone will be sued
Mikala19 (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! I Did It Again - The Best of Britney Spears is indeed a real release, it's available to buy in stores, on iTunes and Amazon. The other one is a fanmade album that somehow got its way on Amazon (the creator of it has stated that he has no idea how it happened). Statυs (talk)</font> 21:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  fake albums 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Britney Spears discography's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "criacerti":
From The Singles Collection (Britney Spears album): 
From 3 (song): 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Britney Spears discography]] 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Britney Spears discography's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "bpicertification":
From Womanizer (song): 
From Toxic (song): 
Reference named "riaacerti":
From Piece of Me: 
From Everytime: 
From Toxic (song): 
From Gimme More: 
From My Prerogative: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Britney Spears discography]] 

message: All her albums worldwide sales are inflated. This article is clearly run by Spears fans. · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 16:11, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it is run by Spears fans... Maybe you should worry about the Beyonce Discography inflation instead of this one. --Amare135 (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I do, I do. But Beyoncé inflated numbers aren't by 7 million. · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 11:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albums worldwide sales 

message: The section "Compilation albums" is obviously a piece of shit. It currently includes multiple unofficial listings as well as EXTREMELY IRRELEVANT ones such as packs like "In the Zone / Britney", "Greatest Hits: My Prerogative / Live and More!", it makes the section looks awful, unorganized and untrustworthy. Britney only has 4 official singles collections/remixes albums which are "Greatest Hits: My Prerogative", "The Singles Collection" and the 2 editions of "B In The Mix", the rest of the titles listed under "Compilation" are either unofficial or 200% irrelevant to the section, making it look like shit. We must only use what was released properly by her label(s), Jive, RCA, Jive/RCA. In case of doubt, use http://www.britney.com/us/music to source your changes. There we only see listed her seven studio albums and their corresponding deluxe editions, and the albums I had cited as her compilation albums. Britney.com is her official website. The other titles there are singles and singles remixes EPs which are not to be listed. --Zefron12 (talk) 13:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messed up compilation albums 

message: Hello everyone. Maybe I don't understand the logic, so explain me, please. Why S&M is listed as a full single with chart peaks that were made even before the remix single release? Article says, remix was peaked at #3 in UK. It's false, remix wasn't even charted in UK. I know, you, Britney fans, want her to have more and more good chart positions worldwide, but it's very irrelevant to show Rihanna's success as Britney's because Britney was credited only in US, SWE and CAN so for other countries there are no proofs and references. And what's more funnier, there are certifications in table, like remix was sold 4x Platinum in UK where Britney wasn't even credited as featured performer :)
So, I think the only right way is marking S&M as promo release (which it is, actually — the promotional single to increase popularity). It was done like half year ago, but someone has changed it again. It can't be in the way it is now, as I said, to many wrong and rigged information. If you show chart positions, you must show only correct Britney-credited peaks with references. It's Wikipedia. --demistalk 06:29, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree with Demis here. "S&M" Remix as he said charted in few territories while the original version was for ex. number one in Australia more before the remix was released. I agree with his suggestion, or eventually, leaving as a single, but adding the numbers of charting where the version of "S&M" was credited as Rihanna featuring Britney Spears. — Tomíca(T2ME) 09:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Promotional singles are free, so that is not it. I don't know how they made it worldwide, but in the U.S., they combined the positions of the original version and remix together. A simple note could work to say that the positions of the original and remix were combined, and not all charting may be relevant to said version.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 10:08, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think we should check the peak positions for the countries that are in the table. If they label "S&M" as Rihanna featuring Britney Spears, then the position is fine to stay, if not we just add — instead. Same goes for the certifications. — Tomíca(T2ME) 10:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's not that easy. For example, "I'm Real" was released in original and remix form (the remix should have been counted as a separate song, as it is, they later changed the rules of it... but that's another story), so both versions effected the charting, but J.Lo was the only one credited.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 10:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looked through the sources, the only chart that credits Spears' name is the US and Canadian Billboard Hot 100. But as I said in my last comment, that does not mean it did not contribute to the chart positions of other countries.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 10:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

text:  Well, tbh, I think the S&M (Remix) only charted in US and Canada as Rihanna featuring Britney Spears. If you check all the Hung Medien published charts for countries like Australia, Norway and New Zealand, you can see that there is not clue of Britney in them. — Tomíca(T2ME) 10:17, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, on Wikipedia everything we add should be sourced right? In the Hung Medien charts Britney's name doesn't appear as a contributor to "S&M", making it quite clear how we should react to it. It's pointless having #1 in Australia in the table, when all of us know that the original version reached #1, not the Remix. Or 4xPlatinum by ARIA. 10:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said, just because her name is not attached does not mean she did not contribute. The remix was released to give the song a boost (which it didn't even needed, but whatever). From what I've seen, it seems like the remixes are only separated in North America. Think of it more like, the Britney remix contributed to its chart positions and therefore it assisted the song in its peaks. Whether or not it had more weight in one chart is not for us to decide, as we don't have that type of information from the sales, airplay, etc. The only thing to add a note, as I suggested. Which she should also be on Rihanna discography; actually, the version that's mentioned as a single only peaked at #2, not #1, as it suggests.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 10:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

text:  Free? Why? Was all Taylor's latest promo singles free? No. --demistalk 10:57, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Two types of promo singles: 1) free and 2) iTunes Countdown (available to buy for a very limited amount of time, and then made off-sale). You can still buy the "S&M" remix.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 11:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

text: And that's your opinion, and you have no evidence that the remix didn't contribute to the charting of the song. The bottom line is, once she did a remix on the song, it became her song also. You can't pick them apart. You can't remove all the positions but the US and Canada and claim that the remix never charted in any other country.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 10:40, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can claim it until otherwise is proven. „Her“ song is only the remix. You can record and release „Somebody That I Used to Know“ remix, but original song wouldn't become yours as you couldn't say 'My single is 6x Platinum' — that's what you say about S&M. So references should be added and only those, which were Britney-credited. We all Britney fans want to give her as much chart success as we can, but please, can we be a little bit rational?--demistalk 11:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's not a accurate comparison in the slightest. Rihanna personally contracted Britney to feature in a remix of the song and it contributed to it chart positions, as we see in the US and Canada (where the remix made the song #1 in both). This is completely rational. You can't go off and claim that it didn't chart in the UK, Australia, etc. when it was combined with the original "S&M" sales.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 11:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I never said that the song doesn't belong to Britney, but, the main artist is Rihanna. And again we are going into circle (and I don't want this to happen). S&M was number one in Australia more before the remix feat Britney was released, meaning the remix didn't do anything to the song peak position. However, it did in the US and CAN (the reason why Billboard credited Britney as a feature and later remove it). I suggest a rationale opinion, the territories that credited Britney can have the peaks, otherwise is WP:OR. And you know that buddy. — Tomíca(T2ME) 12:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  S&M mess and chart peaks 

message: stop posting fake information!
Even the source it links to says: "Femme Fatale," notched another No. 1 album debut and eventually moved 769,000 copies, according to Nielsen SoundScan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.181.182.21 (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Femme Fatale has not sold 1,000,000 

message: According to a page that has been created by Wikipedia album in the zone [9] has sold in america about 4, 5 million in the year 2004 and not 3 million as contained herein. As proof of sending you the link and the page that automatically reports.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_in_music#Top_10_selling_albums_of_the_year_in_the_US
79.131.103.168 (talk) 15:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Wikipedia articles are not considered reliable sources for other Wikipedia articles. The figure that's in this article right now includes a source. I do not see the source supporting that figure in the article you linked to. --ElHef (Meep?) 19:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 19 May 2013 

message: This information has been changed and need to update the page with the changes:
Britney Spears has sold a total of over 134 millions by including sales of all physical and digital albums and singles until 2013 100 millions of these are based on album sales only for confirmation see the following elements:
...Baby One More Time (album) sold 30 millions copies worldwide
...Baby One More Time (Physical single) sold 10 millions copies worldwide
Oops!...I Did It Again! (album) sold 25 millions copies worldwide
Oops!...I Did It Again (Physical single) sold 6 millions copies worldwide
Britney (album) sold 15 millions copies worldwide
In the Zone (album) sold 10 millions copies worldwide
Toxic (Digital and Physical single) sold 6,5 millions copies worldwide
Greatest Hits: My Prerogative (compilation album) sold 7,6 millions copies worldwide
Blackout (album) sold 3,8 millions copies worldwide
Circus (album) sold over 6 millions copies worldwide
Womanizer (Digital single) sold 6 millions copies worldwide
Circus (Digital single) sold 5,5 millions copies worldwide
The Singles Collection (Compilation album) sold 2,4 million copies worldwide
Femme Fatale (album) sold in the US 1.400.000 copies
Till the World Ends (Digital single) sold over 3 millions copies worldwide
Scream and Shout (Digital single) sold over 4 millions copies worldwide
Αdding up all the items together total sales amounted to:
134.469.000 (Physical & Digital total sales Worldwide)
79.131.149.18 (talk) 12:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 12 September 2013 

message: world wide sales of britney 
source-http://dignitywithlove.blogspot.in/2012/02/britney-spears-album-single-sales.html
1.22.84.187 (talk) 00:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed.  What specific edit are you requesting?  RudolfRed (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 29 October 2013 

message: Femme fatale officially moved to 1,400,000 million copies, Billboard reports!
"2011's "Femme Fatale" marked another addition to her collection of No. 1 albums, moving over 2 million copies."
keyword: COPIES
Source: http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/1489017/britney-spears-and-jason-trawick-call-off-relationship
Date: Jan, 11, 2013
"2011's Femme Fatale, was certified platinum, marking sales of over 1 million units."
keyword: SALES, no not "shipments" but SALES!
Source: http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/tv-film/1484267/britney-spears-confirms-x-factor-exit
Date: Jan, 11, 2013
please edit asap :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.184.4.15 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Femme Fatale selling 1,400,000 in the US, Billboard confirms twice! 

message: This needs updating. It states 7 at the top of the discography and lists all 8 below.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.191.97.44 (talk) 18:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eight studio albums have been released, not seven 

message: According to this twitter account Britney Jean has sold 570,000 worldwide: https://twitter.com/chartnews/status/500434979336515584
I'm not sure if it's reliable or not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allu117 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britney Jean sales 

message: why don't let me be the last to know is the only one single that certificate in bel and den stronger break the ice and alot of another certificated to. and stronger overprotected toxic and everytime has gone to gold in france  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.78.69 (talk) 23:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  certification lead  

message: This previously said it charted at sixteen, however it was actually at thirteen. I have altered this both in discography and in the pretty girls page itself; however here is my source in case it is changed, altered or any such other just to prove its charting: http://www.bigtop40.com/chart/archive/2015/25 
This is the website of the UK official charts company which shows that this week, that I have linked to, is not only the first week of its release in the UK but also that the song is placed at 13.
Mikala19 (talk) 14:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  pretty girls uk charts 

message: *stronger and oops are gold and double platinum in sweden   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.78.69 (talk) 11:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  singles  

message: *stronger and oops are gold and double platinum in sweden   
*toxic and 3 have gone gold in riaj(japan) 
*if don't let me be the last to know is certified in bel then all the singles that released before it except stronger and from the bottom 
another singles that certified are i'm a slave 4 u everytime womanizer and till the world ends.
*gimme more is multi platinum in canada and piece of me platinum  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.124.22 (talk) 21:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  singles  

message: can someone explain why half of the single certification not includeon the discography 
*she recived platinum in canada for gimme more and pom even throght its ringtone on beyonce's page its appear.
*oops (single) and stronger are 2 platinum and gold in sweden.
*baby omt 'you drive me crazy , sometimes, oops ,slave,matm,toxic,everytime ,outrageous ,my prerogative,do something,Someday (I Will Understand), 3 and gimme more are gold and platinum in japan.
*11 singles have gone gold in belgiun.
*do something charted in canada with its peak at 16.
*circus,if u seek amy and 3 charted in france in the position 19,11,10 respectively.
*toxic , everytime ,womanizer and overprotected have gone gold in france.
[]
*greatest hits my prerogative and the single collection have gone 3 platinum and gold in australia.
*according to her sales in the usa almost every single need to be certified. 
please edit this discography because its unfair to see that half of those certifications dont appear aqnd on beyonce or rihanna it is  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.124.22 (talk) 23:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  singles  

message: In The Zone peaked at #2 in Germany not #1 
Source: https://www.offiziellecharts.de/album-details-4767  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:167A:F900:D03E:4665:78DA:A894 (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In The Zone - Germany