lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Battles of the Federal Penetration up the Cumberland and Tennessee Rivers of the American Civil War

message: It's a good category, but we have to do something about this name. "Battles of the Federal Penetration up the Cumberland and Tennessee Rivers of the American Civil War" doesn't really "roll off the tongue", does it? --A D Monroe III 13:24, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst... Category Name... Ever!
Talk:Kenneth H. Cooper

message: Cooper gives quite extensive tables of the points worth of various activities in his 'New Aerobics' book. Came out in the early 70s I think, in time to be avidly read by baby-boomers' jogging-crazy years. My understanding was that the tables were based on Cooper's extensive measurements of VO2 (?). IIRC The tables show that the training worth of a mile at 6 minutes and a mile at 10minutes are significantly different (nearly a factor of two IIRC).
(3 miles at 30 to 36 minutes 11 points; 20 to 24 minutes 20 points)
Now in various places on the web you can find the worth of various activities expressed in  Metabolic Equivalent aka METs. These tables seem to show that, once you've broken into a run at 5 to 6 mph, the higher metabolic rate of 6 minutes miling over 10 minute miling is nearly offset by the reduced time spent on the exercise - ie calories per mile is nearly independent of running speed. 
(12 minute miling is 8.5 METs, 6 minute miling is 16 METs)
So what effect did Cooper measure to base his training tables on?? (His tables say if in doubt use calories/20!)
If we understand it, should we include it?
:Just saw the above note, but I must be brief today.
:The basis of the values of the tables should be covered in Training Effect.  I don't know if the exact tables are copyrighted or, since they are based on Air Force research, but I'll ask.
:You're looking for VO2 Max.
:My understanding, and experience, is that total calories and metabolic rate during exercise isn't the issue here - oxygen-use capacity is.  A person who can run 5 miles at 6.5 minutes per mile has a higher oxygen-use capacity than one who can run 5 at 8 per.
:The Training Effect yields a higher metabolic rate ALL the time, not just while exercising.
:The Cooper Center will send more info on the Training Effect and a bio of Dr. Cooper next week.
:Simesa 21:40, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As of today, I haven't received anything from the Cooper Center. Simesa 10:03, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[MET]]s and Cooper Points.

message: I have a note on my Talk page that this article was up for AFD on 1 October 2010 (I've been away from Wikipedia editing for several months) -- I see no AFD sticker.  What happened? Simesa (talk) 05:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD ??

message: In his personal life Dr. Cooper is well known for his Christianity, and has been in Billy Graham Crusades.  From reading his book "Aerobic" he believes in a balanced lifestyle regarding exercise and all of life.  He talked about charting points "aerobically" in his books, something like counting calories.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easeltine (talk • contribs) 14:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christianity 

message: Biography at http://premierespeakers.com/kenneth_cooper/bio Location (talk) 13:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference
Talk:Poecilia sphenops

message: Odd, the article Poecilia says they are fresh-water but the habitat entry for this article sounds like salt water (or I just don't understand it not being expert in zoology).  Can someone check and add it to the article?
I came over here from the article on brackish water, which said that mollies are sold as a freshwater fish but can sometimes do better in brackish (not salt) water.  Maybe that clears things up a bit. Arianna 05:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fresh or salt water?

message: Black molly and midnight molly are not synonims. Black molly is melanistic P. sphenos. Midnight molly is melanistic P. latipinna. Need sources before affirm black molly is P. sphenops x P. latipinna. Ankylosaurus08 (talk) 07:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Black/midnight confusion
Talk:Kyiv Metro

message: I've noticed there's extensive parts of this article that seem lacking in references and/or are unnecessarily detailed. Do we need to know, for example, who exactly ran the first test train, what the PA systems announce at certain stations, or what the exact reasoning for the second failed proposal for the metro was (WP:Overquote)? The whole Architecture section seems almost entirely unsourced, not to mention it seems written in a promotional tone. 
I've done some cursory searching for anything to back up some of these and I can't find anything. If anyone's got better sources for some of these, please let me know; I'm not an expert on this topic and don't know Ukrainian. Otherwise, I might get around to cutting down some of these sections if I got time.
Also I'm relatively inexperienced, much obliged if y'all have any other suggestions. Cheers. Desan 五 | Talk 04:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing and Detail Issues 

message: History needs to be updated to reflect wartime usage. Will insert template Borgenland (talk) 13:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Gilbert Deya

message: It was pointed out to me by someone who does not edit that this article is not neutral and misrepresents facts. Editing by someone who knows more about this subject would be appreciated. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've made this more accurate, and less POV. However, I'm a bit biased against this guy, so I don't feel comfortable removing the POV tag without outside opinions. Dancarney 14:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm going to move this to Gilbert Deya, as it's mainly about him. Objections?   pablohablo. 19:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: He was featured in Channel 4 Dispatches, "Britian's Wich children" broadcast 26-7-2010. Is this worth a mention ?
TheLogster (talk) 20:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispatches
Talk:Henry Percy, 8th Earl of Northumberland

message: What were the charges against Northumberland? DelftUser 14:42, 2005 July 14 (UTC)
That picture is the wrong Percy! The outfit dates to c. 1630-1650, and cannot be the chap who died in 1580s!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.226.6 (talk) 09:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Unreleased albums

message: We should put all upcoming (to be released) albums in the subcategory of Category:Upcoming albums, as some of these albums may be unreleased, but may not ever be planned to be released at all. secfan 14:48, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
:Yeah I noticed the redundancy of the two categories too...  --Madchester 22:45, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
What about [ABBA]'s final ninth album Was it just unfinished?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.75.63.48 (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming albums
Talk:Nokia 6610

message: Anyone know how to adjust the volume on the FM Radio for this nokia?
:While the Radio is on, just press the volume controls (The volume controls are located at the top of the left side of the phone (on the black part), and appear as one long skinny button. Press the top half for volume up, the bottom half of the button to volume down.).
::I think you'll find it written in the users manual. ☺  Spiby  ☻ 15:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Earl of Kimberley

message: I can't finmd a source to confims the Heir Apparent is Lord [David John Simon] Wodehouse, born in 1978.
Try this []Alci12 16:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Was Sir Pelham Grenville W. related to this line?  —Tamfang 06:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but not in remainder to the earldom. —Tamfang (talk) 00:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  a familiar name
Talk:Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park

message: I merged the material from this article into Bank of America Tower, New York City. I did it for the following reasons:
*The new title allows people not from the United States who want to find an article on the building to only have to have a general knowledge of where the building is located (ie. New York City being more broad than Bryant Park).
*On the Bank of America page, the list of buildings had Bank of America Tower, New York City listed rather than Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park.
I have credited the merged information and images to this article in the edit history in Bank of America Tower, New York City. Jaxl 15:00, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:First Monday

message: What about the Internet magazine "First Monday" (http://www.firstmonday.org/)? Shouldn't there be an article about it too, or at least some reference? It's probably better known than the TV series, at least outside the US...
:In Wikipedia articles, there are 7 linking to the TV show and only 1 linking to the Internet magazine.  There is also one ambiguous link.  I am not counting user pages.  I am not counting the Did You Know pages or the Main Page, as these links are temporary for featuring this article in DYK.
::Anyone can create articles on Wikipedia, anonymous poster, though it's recommended that you start a free account first so that you can interact with other users.  You could, for example, create a new article at First Monday (website) and create a link to it from the top of the First Monday article's page.  For general information on editing Wikipedia, see Help:Contents.  --LostLeviathan 09:24, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

message: What was the reason for the series' cancellation?  Was it simply a matter of low ratings, or was there a more complicated reason?  A link to a press release on the subject would be nice.  --LostLeviathan 09:25, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for cancellation? 

message: Previous text included: "The case foreshadowed the real-life Terri Schiavo controversy that would gain national attention in 2005." I deleted this because a 2002 TV show is incapable of "foreshadowing" actual 2005 occurrences. Foreshadowing requires foreknowledge of the ending on the part of the writer, which could not have been the case here. Lemmiwinks.rex (talk) 01:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to "Right to Die" 

message: Charles Durning's character is listed twice, as both main and supporting.  I recommend a decision.  ☺  Uncle G (talk) 22:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: Should we write something about the transphobia in the pilot episode? 81.101.132.217 (talk) 08:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we mention transphobia
Talk:Bank of America Tower (Manhattan)

message: The introduction, "ecotower.jpg", "One Bryant Park constructio.jpg", and The Durst Organization link were merged from Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park, which now redirects here. Jaxl 15:01, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: Is it possible that the tower is still under consruction as of August 2009? The building has been topped out in December 2007. Can the construction works take a so long time? The Burj Dubai in Dubai is ready for occupancy in September 2009, and it has been topped in January 2009. In comparison, the Burj Dubai is taller than two Bank of America Towers. The building should be finsihed since winter 2008/9. --Jerchel (talk) 12:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still under construction??? 

message: In this article I see 58 floors heigth. Under the photo I see 55 floors. I see three sites that mention 54 floors, and no sites that mention some other number. I should say 54. Any comment? Salix2 (talk) 21:27, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My comment is 54 or 58, there should be some mention of why the shorter Chrysler building has 77 floors. There must be an extraordinary difference in floor height or something. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many floors 

message: Despite the fact that this is the second tallest building in New York City, I can't find any relevant reviews of the architecture. It would be nice to include a section on that if possible.Sylvain1972 (talk) 16:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: What is it used for? Or is it purely cosmetic? What drove the owners, or whoever, to build it? It's a "curiosity".. --HawkFest (talk) 13:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Spire 
Talk:Sunabeda

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Any information added without reference is likely to be deleteed in future. -- P.K.Niyogi 04:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 

message: I have removed whole swathes of the History section, as these constituted uncited, potentially libellous, personal opinion.  Controversial statements must be cited from reliable sources.  Wikipedia is not the place to have a personal rant: if that's what you want to do, start a blog elsewhere.  Skinsmoke (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:SS.10

message: I got the cost of the missile from the Russian source - however the numbers seem a little screwy - if you convert 1955 Francs into Dollars using http://www.eh.net/hmit/exchangerates/ the cost of the missile comes out at about 1 dollar - that's clearly wrong. I suspect that the number has been "re-based" (divided by 100) in New Francs - see French Franc - does anyone have a source to prove it ?
Although 100 dollars is still pretty cheap - I've seen that the AT-3 Sagger was 500 dollars a missile in the 1960s.
Megapixie 15:13, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Too Much (Spice Girls song)

message: There's also a film called too much, see here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094164/ dreamcatcher23 22:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  film 
Talk:Dennis Chávez

message: Shouldn't his intimidation of Walt Whitmore Jr. -- part of the Roswell Incident cover-up -- be mentioned?  (Details can be found in the bullet point for Walt Whitmore Jr. at Witness accounts of the Roswell UFO incident#Accounts of intimidation.) -John Rigali (talk) 03:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Role in [[Roswell Incident]] cover-up

message: *The article is unreferenced.  The source of individual facts presented is unclear and difficult to verify. see Wikipedia:Footnotes-----Adimovk5 (talk) 21:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems
Talk:Kenzer & Company

message: I put a request for expansion for this article on July 14th, 2005.--Azathar 15:36, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the tag mentions that there's no references, so anything should do. However, to avoid any doubts about the notability of K&C, find a good third-party article talking about them, and add references based on what they say (even adding appropriate content based on the article to do so). However, I also note that the second paragraph starting with "They are known for..." would be a great place to provide references. Show that they are known for these titles. --Rindis (talk) 22:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Patent prosecution

message: I am not as familiar with how Wikipedia deals with sub topics or alternative terms, but I think this article should not be merged with patent application.
I needed to know what patent prosecution means.  I wasn't sure if it refered to the application proces or the process of prosecute patent infringers.  If the patent prosecution article was merged with the patent application article I doubt I would have found my answer as quickly as I did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebrenner (talk • contribs) 
I do not think this article should be merged.  As someone who prosecutes patents, it is my opinion that a patent application is just one step in a very long process of getting a patent. Dratoff (talk) 23:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not merge.. 

message: Patent Prosecution is a process distinct from patent infringement litigation.  Prosecution of the patent is merely the "back-and-forth" between the inventor and the USPTO, in an attempt to come to an equilibrium between allowable and non-allowable subject matter.  A patent is "prosecuted" in the process of application.  I beleive these terms could easily be combined.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.174.73.17 (talk • contribs) 
:I think they should be merged - as per the above, prosecution is the process that occurs during a patent application.  (don't forget, though, that's its not just the USPTO that issues patents). Kcordina  Talk  14:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine.. 

message: Surely it should be sufficient to have references to professional bodies like CIPA (in the UK), rather than direct plugs for specific firms? -- 62.8.111.131 15:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plugs for firms?

message: The Federal Circuit in In re Tanaka reversed the USPTO decision in Ex Parte Tanaka. The current law is the opposite of what is stated in this article.  See this announcement by the USPTO: http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/notices/tanaka01aug2011.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.112.19.2 (talk) 18:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot. I have indicated in the article that the information is dated. Please feel free to update the text directly.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --Edcolins (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Law
Talk:Seebohm Rowntree

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This article is terrible. It is very NPOV and unbalanced. It really needs to be re-edited by someone who knows what they are talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.250.155 (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible 

message: I have attmepted a bit of clean up and therefore have removed the tag. 172.212.103.181 20:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: clean up

message: I'm planning to correct the definitions of Primary and Secondary Poverty to bring them in line with those in Rowntree's Book Poverty.  Both groups being defined as being below the poverty line but for different reasons.  The part of Poverty that deals with this can be read at the External Link to Glasgow University on the article, follow the link summary and conclusion and look at pages 295 and 296. Kaly99 12:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Correcting definitions of Primary and Secondary Poverty 

message: The following concern was raised on the article's main page:
Large chunks of this work are lifetd direct from Haralambos and Holborn, "Sociology themes and perspectives." 4th edition (1998) see as an example "Criticism of his work." Compare with page 127 in H&H. Yet I see no acknowledgement of H&H in this text.
Francium12 (talk) 11:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I independently assessed the criticism section as original research. It had already been tagged for lack of citations. I've taken the step of removing it. If other parts of this work are plagiarism, there may be copyright problems. --Geau (talk) 17:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagarism?
Talk:Cuba, Illinois

message: It seems that most of this article is compromised of demographic data, notably a census conducted over two decades ago at time of writing. Though I'm not sure how to supplement this myself (being wholly unaffiliated with Illinois) it does seem to lead to a weird, off-balanced article. XymphosCraK (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographic data
Talk:Sharon Vineyard

message: ...And now as Chris Vinyard aka Vermouth (Belmot in Japanese)...
'Vermouth' in Japanese is pronounced 'Berumott', not Belmot. In Japanese 'L's are turned into 'R's . This is because there is no 'L's in the japanese writing system.
Eri-chan150.203.228.227 05:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header
Talk:Stereophonics

message: I've noticed the Stereophonics and Kelly Jones articles often being edited back and forth, as to whether the band/person in question is introduced as British or Welsh. Wales (even though not everyone might like it) is officially part of Britain, so both nationalities are correct. What would be the solution to this? Feathery Sunshine (talk) 00:49, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We go by what reliable sources say. All sources (apart from Wikipedia and Wikipedia mirrors) say "Welsh band", so that's what it should be to reduce the potential for readers to be a little confused when arriving at the article. SilkTork (talk) 21:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  British or Welsh? 

message: Should the lead section read "... are a Welsh alternative rock band..." or "... are a Welsh rock band..."? Ultra Violet Light (talk) 16:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock or alternative rock? 

message: Any idea why this redirects here? Should be mentioned somewhere on the page. — LlywelynII 14:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the first single, but the release itself was not of note. Perhaps it should redirect to the discography? It is mentioned there. Karst (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Debut singles are generally worth mentioning in an article on the band. I've now mentioned it with a cite. SilkTork (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Looks Like Chaplin]]