Talk:Computer-supported collaboration

message: : It is reasonable to imagine that such a system may be capable of solving entire classes of problem that cannot be solved by classical symbol-processing systems that can be mapped to "Turing machines." 
This bizarre claim is totally unsubstantiated and should be removed. Leibniz 20:22, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Computability

message: This whole section needs to be condensed into one paragraph, or deleted entirely. It is terrible and not super relevant to the field of cscw as a whole. I will be deleting it in a week or so if there are no objections here. Thanks! Leafman (talk) 17:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just about "computing" 

message: I'm seeing a lot of "collaboration" and "cooperation" buzzwords appearing as articles. Those articles often refer to each other, and need some organization.
See my list of examples at Talk:Collaborative working environment.
— Wdfarmer (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A confusing array of buzzword articles needs structure 

message: There is no research field named “Computer-supported collaboration“. It’s just a term sometimes used in a loose way a by few researchers (try a Google Scholar search). 
Kjeld Schmidt  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjeld Schmidt (talk • contribs) 15:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be removed 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://collaboration.wikicities.com/wiki/Category:Technology
*:Triggered by \bwikicities\.com\b on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Computer-supported collaboration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051122004117/http://www.si.umich.edu/SPARC/index.htm to http://www.si.umich.edu/sparc/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051204034402/http://www.scienceofcollaboratories.org/ to http://www.scienceofcollaboratories.org/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051129084645/http://www.blogpulse.com/papers/2005/AdamicGlanceBlogWWW.pdf to http://www.blogpulse.com/papers/2005/AdamicGlanceBlogWWW.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Some of the writing style employed in this article seems a bit less encyclopedic than Wikipedia as a whole and more like an essay. I would edit rather than tagging if I had more time this afternoon as well as more knowledge about the subject matter as a whole, but I'm lacking in both respects. I have an issue with the following paragraph in particular, but more editing than just this paragraph are likely to be needed.
:Who am I, online? Can an account be assumed to be the same as a person's real-life identity? Should I have rights to continue any relationship I start through a service, even if I'm not using it any longer? Who owns information about the user? What about others (not the user) who are affected by information revealed or learned by me?
Essaykid (talk) 19:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing Style