Talk:Death of Kelsey Smith-Briggs

message: Why did an unnamed user remove the reference to the Motion for New Trial?  There are now no references at all.  Should this be reverted, or not?AppalachianLady 02:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussions without headers

message: I have edited the article significantly and added a few footnotes. Hope it helped at least a little bit. Kael-kun (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would invite anyone with a modicum of education to read the US Observer link referenced above and conclude it is  anything other than base invective (and a poor attempt).  Where is any objective presentation of fact?  Where is a rational timeline or specific reference made to official reports (which do amply exist)?  This is a strikingly obvious attempt at obfuscation and character assassination.  (except, strangely enough, the perpetrator who fatally kicked a baby in the stomach somehow gets a journalistic equivalent of a token slap on the wrist?) If you removed every adjective the sentences become either equivocal, meaningless, or bald invective.  IMHO (which doesn't count for much) this is the equivalent of hate-speech.  Please, gentle readers who happen by and are willing to spare a moment to give it a critical read - i.e. dont accept the author's premises without requiring him to prove or substantiate them - I will not remove it but will support anyone who does. István (talk) 04:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit

message: Ive found two official summaries of this case in the state archives and have made some major revisions including them as references.  Reading these exposes the External link from usobserverok.com (placed by an SPA) as obviously unencyclopaedic, at best. István (talk) 18:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ive removed it for being invective, mostly unrelated to the article subject.István (talk) 13:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 3 September Edits

message: In addition to the requested move, I propose that Kelsey Smith-Briggs Child Protection Reform Act be merged here. As of now, that article just duplicates or reiterates what already exists here. While I've seen cases where we have separate articles for a law and the victim it is named after (e.g. Laci Peterson and Laci and Conner's Law and Jessica Lunsford and Jessica's Law) and cases where we don't (e.g. Nixzmary Brown and Nixzmary's Law and Amber Hagerman and AMBER Alert), this seems to fall into the latter because it only applies to one state. Usually, a law would need a separate article if it reaches Congress or goes beyond a small area. Since the law's article is quite short, undoing a merge would not be too difficult should it be needed. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion

message: Substituted at 13:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Death of Kelsey Smith-Briggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719164845/http://www.poncacitynews.com/templates/298403401614351.bsp to http://www.poncacitynews.com/templates/298403401614351.bsp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727142101/http://www.oksenate.org/news/press_releases/press_releases_2006/pr20060426g.html to http://www.oksenate.org/news/press_releases/press_releases_2006/pr20060426g.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified