Talk:Ecopsychology

message: This isn't linked to from the article on the founder. Secretlondon 11:02, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Founder link

message: Shamanic counselling is quite different than Ecopsychology, though the two operate under similar principles.  An analogy would like saying that a lamp is synonymous with electricity.  
Solace098 19:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shamanic counselling

message: It assumes that this theory is scientifically sound, completely correct, and contains absolutely no criticism of ecopsychology. It is also written in a confusing and obscuring style, which makes it very difficult for most readers to comprehend.
Lord Patrick 03:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've addressed the advertising wording, I've look hard for criticism but didn't find any. Evolutionary psychology is more controversial as it makes specific claims / predictions that are up for debate. Ecopsychology, not as much. One could fault ecopsychology for being more spiritual in practice than scientific, there would need to be reliable source to back that up. - RoyBoy 22:22, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some think this article is biased. 

message: As there are no references at the end of the article, it really should have a tag to indicate this. I have put in the link to transpersonal ecology  -  as the person who started that article, I have included some references, but these are all journal articles from "Journal of Transpersonal Psychology". If any one has read books by Warwick Fox, it would be good if s/he could cite these both here and at the end of the article transpersonal ecology. ACEOREVIVED 22:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References missing

message: My suggestion is to keep the two separate, but place a link to each, such as under the 'also' heading. Both topics have a different set of references and workers in the field. They may be working in parallel and should combine in the scientific literature. But that is not for wikipedia to do. Lauriec (talk) 10:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conservation Psychology

message: I think psychoecology and Ecopsychology are diferent and the first one should have its own article. A french writer (Jean Pierre Alain FAYE) defines precisely this concept: http://www.psychoecologie.net/ --Ecureuil espagnol (talk) 14:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychoecology 

message: Howdy, folks!  I'm the university student who's working on this article as an anthropology assignment, as per the banner above.  Yes, I know it has been a while since I put that banner up there... alas, scheduling. So far, my plan is to delve into those referrences and sources, and do something about fixing the in-text citation issue.  I'm also going to try using my university resources to see if I can find any relevant material, and trying my hand at some copyediting, since I have been led to believe that I'm good at making things read nice.  I'll add to my mission statement if I think of anything else, and if there's anything anybody thinks I should try doing, feel free to shout!
EmeraldWithin (talk) 23:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello EmeraldWithin and welcome!  Talk posts go at the bottom of the page and if you have any questions about WP you can leave a message on my take page linked at the end of my sig.   Alternatively you can use the  template on your talk page and someone will answer your inquiry shortly.  There are a lot of policies on WP but generally if you stick to sources and use neutral writing you should be fine. Noformation Talk 23:54, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: University Assignment

message: Perhaps there should be a section devoted to the applications of ecopsychology and a list of "peer-reviewed" therapies developed from this area of research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcalder (talk • contribs) 19:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Application

message: One editor asked me to justify adding the notability tag: My concern was that the sources attached to this article were either self-published (Anderson, giapsychology). We only seem to have one article that mentions the topic in any significant way (psychology today), and I'm not sure if that alone implies notability for this subject. --Salimfadhley (talk) 14:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Alaynna2023 (talk) 03:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi everyone! New Wikipedia editor here! I am in a capstone class for my psychology degree and have a natural affinity for learning about how nature and psych interact. While reading the article, I saw a distinct lack of sources that connected the theories for ecopsychology to the BIPOC practices most of the basis of ecopsychology derives from. I am looking to add a cultural connection section, as I believe it is important to give credit where credit is due. Please let me know if you come across anything, and/or if you have some advice. I'm still a little shaky on what's considered a good source, but look forward to editing with y'all! Psychologylearner1 (talk) 06:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello----I just came across your article, and noted the point about deficiencies in the field of ecopsychology.I'm thinking that my ideas about ecological restoration as a context for negotiating a positive relationship between an ecosystem and its human inhabitants might be of interest. For one thing, it is based in part on a theory of the experience of values such as community and beauty that is not sentimental, but proposes that the human experience of the "other," including the rest of nature entails the experience of existential shame, and that performance, ritual and the arts provide the crucial technologies for "metabolizing" this in an emotionally productive way, passing, as Frederick Turner has said, "through shame to beauty". Hence the notion of restoration as a context for ritual, and so a way of engaging the shame arising from our experience of the other (including what we may have done to it) and dealing with it productively. If you'd like to check this out, perhaps the most relevant source for my thinking about this is my book "The Sunflower Forest: Ecological Restoration and the New Communion with Nature" (California, 2003). William R. Jordan III (talk) 22:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: The redirect Reearthing has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Skarmory (talk • contribs) 07:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Reearthing]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]