lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leicestershire Scout County (The Scout Association)

message: The County articles are both few and generally short. Articles on camp sites and groups are also likely to be short and are likely to be put forward for deletion as not notable. It is best to merge such articles into the County articles. --Bduke 07:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging [[Willesley]] to here

message: While discussion on this merge should be taking place here, there is actually discussion taking place at Talk:Scogui. Perhaps the debate should be completed there. --Bduke 00:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of [[Scogui]] here

message: I have consulted with another editor - outside of Scouting.  Assuming good faith, I'm afraid that I cannot see that these new sites fit in with Wikipedia as they appear effectively nothing more than a list of branches of The Scout Association.  For further information on this please see the section Wikipedia is not a soapbox on Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, notably the section on advertising.  Even when open to Groups of all Associations these pages were of suspect standard, and closing them to independent Groups has not helped in any way.  
I suggest returning them to their original format, a new format that allows all Scouting in a County to be reported, or, alternatively, deleted as inappropriate.  -- DiverScout (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Major Disaster

message: There's a scene where GL Jon Stewart is shown battling Major Disaster on the antimatter world and the Major used lightning. Except for the uniform, which was all black, and the lack of a cape, he could have be the antimatter Captain Marvel. Captain, Major, being military ranking, the cuffed boots, the squinted eyes. Donmega60645 17:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have the trade in front of me, but unless the character was explicitly stated as Major Disaster, I think it was Black Adam. All black uniform, no cape, looked like Captain Marvel? That's usually Black Adam. Did the guy have pointed ears and a thunderbolt on his chest? Cybertooth85 12:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  JLA: Syndicate Rules 

message: There was no source but it is said on the Boss Moxie page that 'Also, Dan stated that Moxie had killed Major Disaster during the "Battle of Metropolis." ' Lots42 (talk) 00:31, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't even make sense - either Superboy Prime killed Major Disaster or Boss Moxie - only one was at that fight.  98.203.174.254 (talk) 03:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Touche. Further evidence points it was Boss Moxie killed by SP. Lots42 (talk) 17:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting
Talk:Kasey Green

message: Kasey is classed as a Kangaroos player however he is yet to play an AFL match with the club. Should this be left like this, considering players like Gerard Healy who was listed at Collingwood but never played a senior match. Even though there is a big chance he will be playing a senior game, it does add him to the class of a NM player.
:The qualification should be 1 VFL/AFL game for the club, however I think we could be a tad more lenient for players who are currently listed. Rogerthat Talk 09:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Kangaroos
Talk:Vibhishana

message: @ I see you just reverted my edit. As far as the article says, Vibhishana is  a character from Mahabharata. He is not an historic King. So it's better not to use Infobox royalty, unless you have reliable sources proving the contrary. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 05:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox selection
Talk:Dave Dreiwitz

message: I'm not so sure but isn't Dave Dreiwitz the so-called Mean Ween? On the cover of 'The POD', there's the notice 'Mean Ween played the bass'. See The Pod description on Wikipedia
The bassist on the cover of The Pod is not Dave Dreiwitz, it's Cribber.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.31.245 (talk) 19:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is he gay? Ween's official facts site says he is http://www.ween.net/ween-faq.html, but a lot of the facts are also tongue and cheek so who knows? Mrmoustache14 (talk) 04:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: gay?
Talk:Tomasz Winnicki (political activist)

message: If everyone who posted racist comments online was a notable figure Wikipedia would be full of this info. There is no claim to notability for this individual. The article seems like a way to "expose" the individual or punish him for being racist. As far as the information on the individual's actions, the article only states that the individual was a prolific poster of racist material on a racist forum and attracted some unwanted attention in the form of quasi-legal action by a lawyer. The article and its associated talk page are good candidates for speedy deletion. Imstillhere 07:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Winiki's court outcomes make this article notable. There is not that many instances of people being convicted of hate in Canada. The descions will effect further such proceedings and their outcomes. --Mista-X 20:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you just put foward an AFD or are you that confident you'd lose? But fine, if you want to ask Jimbo go for it, I'm sure he'll disagree with you. Homey 01:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I believe the individual does meet notability for an article. If you think Wikipedia standards are otherwise, why don't you site from Wikipedia notability to back up your argument? --Mista-X 01:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion Request 

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some [or an] image[s] from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
*Category:Images with no fair use rationale
*Category:Images with no copyright tag
*Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Iolakana|(talk) 18:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted image(s)
Talk:Tom Meschery

message: I removed a tribute to Meschery that someone, probably a former student, wrote.  While it's a nice sentiment, it isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. --EngineerScotty 07:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bubble hash

message: This is not a place for you to advertise. If your product is so superior to bags then by all means spend some money to advertise in the commercial market. This is a place for unbiased fact.
There are numerous spelling errors in your edits, bad sentance structure, and biased points of view. Please see npov and Five Pillars.
:Please remember to sign your posts on talkpages. Use four tildes (~~~~) to do so. Thanks! ~Kylu (u|t)  18:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This became an edit war while I was alseep? Wow. ViridaeTalk 22:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  JR Pietri, please stop the edit war to include your sales material 

message: I noticed :Bubblehash and think it should be merged and redirected to :Bubble hash.--Alf melmac 20:29, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would just go ahead and do that - not much pont in having two articvles on the same thing. ViridaeTalk 23:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This recent edit states "see patent" so far the two patents have been for a generic plant oil extractor, none of it mentions hash, none of it. Not applicable. Just because the Wonder-hash-makerTM makes use of the patented method does not mean that only that stuff is called ice hash. --Alf melmac 15:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: There is an RfC open involving this article. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JR Pietri ViridaeTalk 02:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To all involved with this article

message: This article needs to go... this is blatant advertisement and should probably be speedy-deleted, but since there's been a lot of arguing about it, it should go through the AfD process (since any user can block a speedy-delete by objecting to it). Vpoko 23:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI... I have nominated the article for deletion, to be replaced with a redirect to Bubble hash. Vpoko 01:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubblehash]]
Talk:Danny Stanley

message: Considering Danny has yet to make his AFL Debut I will remove category:Collingwood footballers as it may cause conflict between proper players represented. Until he makes his debut, the category will be added. This is only a minor edit however, only to resolve a problem on the Collingwood Magpies players page Lonie From 50 07:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, very good point Lonie. Rogerthat Talk 09:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Yet to play AFL Football
Talk:Bank of Finland

message: What about the ESCB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louis3ham (talk • contribs) 08:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ESCB
Talk:List of MyNetworkTV affiliates

message: Re: It is unknown whether or not KTMF-DT2 picked up MyNetworkTV.
TitanTV lists MyNet programming on KTMF-DT2, after FOX primetime.  For example, Wednesday: American Idol at 7-9pm Mountain, Burn Notice reruns at 9-11pm.  
--207.255.199.12 (talk) 04:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  KTMF-DT2
Talk:Sampati

message: I think it is young Jatayu who flew higher and Sampati as a rightful brother spread his wings to save him from burning his(Jatayu's) wings - and burning his own in the process.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.65.117 (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Larry Kenon

message: I have tagged this is at it needs a tidy to make it more readable and less busy - I'm sure the content's fine - needs to look better on the page. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper?) 08:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention
Talk:Shannon Marketic

message: It's ok, and desireable to discuss the lawsuit.  But, only facts from independent, neutral, reliable sources, can be brought into this, given the sensitive nature of it.  Citing opinions/claims of parties is ok, as a compliment to the facts, but first we need reporting of the facts.  I vaguely recall this being reported in the mainstream media, so finding good sources, shouldn't be hard.  So, I'm mystified why the contributor(s) haven't bothered to do that.  Not every web site is a reliable nvsource.  --Rob 02:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reliable sources added from mainstream media and photocopy of lawsuit. 64.131.3.144 09:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  lawsuit
Talk:Anthony J. Bryant

message: Anthony died 25 December 2013. Obituary will be linked when available. Sourced through his personal Facebook account: https://www.facebook.com/anthony.bryant.3990
Goodbye, old friend. We all miss you. 75.129.136.224 (talk) 07:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Obit - http://dailyjournal.net/view/obit/16748/#.Ur5O3bCA3IU 2601:D:9400:3CD:1832:F6F1:843D:46A8 (talk) 04:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Agapetos angel

message: See here . JoshuaZ 16:57, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe if AA could be convinced that admins wouldn't close ranks, by punishing AA for daring to complain about admins' violation of Wiki rules.  At present, the admins reacted to AA's justified complaint by banning her, and while grudgingly admitted that her opponents were guilty of edit warring, the ArbCom not only didn't punish them, but allows them to ban AA for editing this article.60.242.13.87 09:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agapetos seems to no longer be participating in the RfA 

message: In response to a request at my user talk page I performed an investigation on two IP addresses that have been active at the Jonathan Sarfati biography, which is one of the articles from which Agapetos angel has been indefinitely banned.  At User_talk:Durova#AA_meeting Otheus, who appears to have acted in good faith, petitioned me to investigate the possibility that 60.242.13.87 and 58.162.2.122, both of which have been blocked or warned per this arbitration case, are not the same person as Agapetos angel.  Otheus presented evidence both onsite and via e-mail in support of that possibility.
Upon investigation, I conclude that these two IPs are almost certainly the same person, unlikely to be Agapetos angel, and very possibly Mr. Sarfati himself.  My evidence is summarized with a fair number of diffs in the thread and I can provide more upon request.  Does the original ruling cover this situation?  Please advise. DurovaCharge! 06:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I note that the original article-ban remedy was applied to (among others named) User:58.162.252.236, User:58.162.255.242 and User:58.162.251.204, as well as "any user, registered or not, who engages in the same type of tendentious editing as has been done by Agapetos angel."  I suggest, unless the AC wishes to make a clarifying statement to some other effect (or the user(s) concerned wish(s) to appeal the original remedy), that the best course would be to have an uninvolved admin review the blocks, with particular regard to whether these are the same editor as sanctioned previously in a similar IP range, and/or have engaged in sufficiently similar behaviour to merit such sanction.  Alai 02:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good suggestions.  That has already been done.  This particular rabbit hole goes rather deep. DurovaCharge! 02:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Agapetos angel]]
Talk:The Outbursts of Everett True

message: This article needs an example strip...  The original Everett True strips are all in the public domain now, aren't they?  They're from before 1917.  It's just a matter of choosing one or two that fit best and putting them in. --Aquillion 08:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added one.  Best public domain comic ever. --Jfruh 06:44, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shame you didn't use the tram one. "The cobbles with you!" --Mister Six 10:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Niggling a wiki contributor eh! I'll edit the pounds from your face if you don't learn that if you think something can be done better, you best do it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.132.24 (talk) 09:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: In May 2009, John Adcock posted on Yesterday's Paper that "(t)he last comic strip under the Condo name was printed in 1946, forty-four years later. Even then “Everett True” continued as a pale version of its former self well into the sixties under the title 'Uncle Ev,' featuring Everett True". If true, this should obviously be in the article; can anyone verify this? DS (talk) 16:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting details
Talk:S. Rajaratnam

message: For instructions on how to insert a reference, please refer to http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php (Message transffered from previously hidden message in article) Mr Tan 08:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Instructions

message: S Rajaratnam has made quite a number of notable quotes. If anyone can gather all of this quotes, we may create a page on Wikiquote. --Terence Ong 13:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The page is created, please help to expand. :D --Vsion (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A page on Wikiquote? 

message: Former Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister: Mr S.Rajaratenam
has been an inspirational leader to the young and old throughout the years of his life. A man instill us with his enriching and striking speeches and warmed our hearts by his hospitable approach. Rajaratnam never fails to end it with his trademark-a big smile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.39.34 (talk) 11:01, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes we all know that, and I have that opinion too. However, Wikipedia is not somewhere you should comment about S Rajaratnam's personality. Please put in a blog, we are discussing things related to the article. --Terence Ong 14:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Living Icon and A Fatherly Figure 

message: Can anyone give me some details about his exact ideaology?
CSJ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.6.54 (talk) 16:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideaology
Talk:Swallows and Amazons

message: I've made a start to the new article about the book, but it still needs a lot of work. --G Rutter 08:50, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I have added the relative ages of the Swallows & Amazons to the Characters section.  I wasn't sure what to put for Roger though, as he is the youngest of the crew but he still has a younger sister, (Bridget).  I've put him down as "Youngest of the Walkers" which isn't quite right but Bridget isn't mentioned in this section.  JP Godfrey (Talk to me) 14:37, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a page List of characters in Arthur Ransome books though it needs some work, why don't we just link to that and remove the section from here? Dabbler 15:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

text: It's from Mavis Altounyan, one of the real family whom the Walker children were based on. Mavis' nickname came from a book called "The Titty Mouse and the Tatty Mouse". Andy Dingley (talk) 20:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Characters Section

message: Anyone mind if I change this to "Blake Holme (Blakeholme)" It's a better fit with the rest of Wikipedia and the Ordnance Survey. I'll change the other use as well. --Old Moonraker (talk) 19:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done--Old Moonraker (talk) 08:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blakeholme or Blake Holme
Talk:Nicole Bobek

message: Being from Michigan and remembering her performances back in the 1990s, I was surprised to learn that her legal case may have set precendent in state law. Please note that the cited "legal opinion" is not an "opinion" in the sense we might ordinarily describe it here on Wikipedia. For instance, the FTC regularly provides "opinions" on credit and consumer law - their understanding of the intent and scope of a particular legal case. It's not the same as what Joe or Jane Schmo might say about a consumer law - it could be used to back up later legal proceedings, cases or law. The opinion also encapsulates several sources showing where her case was entered into the state legal record. Noirdame 08:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I did not add this, because I do not remember the details, and at present I don't have access to reliable news accounts.  Also I am not sure that it is important enough to add.  But I thought I would put a note here in case someone (or me) wants to pursue it further in the future.  Here are links to archived newspaper articles discussing the incident:  In Britain, Bobek Is as Cool as Ice; Top U.S. Female Skater Deflects Tabloids About Off-Ice Troubles Book on figure skating reveals plenty.   —Mark Dominus (talk) 13:46, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1995 mini-bar incident 

message: I trimmed the lede paragraph to bring into prominence the most important fact about Bobek, that she was a U.S. national figure skating champion.  Previously, that was so buried that a reader unfamiliar with figure skating might have missed it.  
I ha dplanned to restore the other material that I deleted, but all of it still appears elsewhere in the article.
—Mark Dominus (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimmed lede paragraph
Talk:Regional Health Information Organization

message: My arguments regarding this page's neutrality are at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional Health Information Organization. –Sommers (Talk) 09:03, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 22:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: I spent some effort editing this article, removing prose that read like press releases where there was no evidence that the work proposed had been accomplished to date. I also streamlined the text by removing redundancies, which are perhaps inevitable when several organizations announce their identical good intentions with respect to patient care and provider benefit.
I also simplified the discussion of centralized vs. federated RHIO models, which are in fact identical to the issues of centralized data warehousing vs. distributed data federation. Several of the "pros-and-cons" meantioned earlier derive from centralized vs. distributed storage/ data-access control, and other points that were mentioned (e.g., differences in technical difficulty) were spurious. The choice of one model vs the other is driven more by political/trust considerations: distributed models exist mainly because individual institutions are reluctant to give up control of their data, which might happen if a copy of their data existed remotely with a different organization.
Prakash Nadkarni (talk) 19:47, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed the public-relations-speak
Template talk:CryptographyTasks

message: This part of the page lists "Stream cipher designs", but "Block ciphers". Shouldn't this be fixed to be the same, i.e. either add "designs" to block ciphers or remove it for stream ciphers? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joachim Strombergson (talk • contribs) 10:11, 23 February 2006  (UTC).
: Sure, feel completely free to tweak it. Because this page is meant to be a "behind-the-scenes" tool to help editors find things to do, it's not hugely important that it's polished. — Matt Crypto 09:22, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:New Right (UK)

message: In light of Gnostrat's comments and the lack of replies from others as well as the weak notability of the UK New Right, I've canceled Harrypotter's merge proposal and replaced it with my proposal that we merge New Right (UK) article into the Nouvelle Droite article. --Loremaster (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nouvelle Droite

message: Its demise was announced in the article with this uncited 24 January 2017 edit by 86.142.165.232, an IP who has only made two edits. Can we find any formal news reports of the demise of this organisation? Did it survive Jonathan Bowden or die with him? wbm1058 (talk) 18:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't seem to have any citation post-dating Jonathan Bowden's death; New Right doesn't seem to have been registered as a company, nor as a political party, so its hard to be sure. As you'll see from elsewhere, I've proceded with the merge (as an alternative to deletion). Klbrain (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly seems that way by virtue of the fact that they´re website can only be accessed through the web archive. StrongALPHA (talk) 16:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did this outfit become defunct?
Talk:Spark-ignition engine

message: Spark ignition refers to a means of ignition in internal combusion engines.  This article is using it to describe the engines themselves.  I would expect spark ignition to describe the mechanisms used to produce sparks and how they are applied.  Coils magnetos , distributors etc .  Lumos3 09:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, so I have re-named it Spark-ignition engine. Biscuittin (talk) 21:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs to be renamed

message: Can we have some typical timing here, like voltage rise time across the spark gap, jitter before electrical break down in the gas, rise time of the current, frequency and number of oscillations to heat the gas sufficiently for ignition (in the presence of the strong winds / turbulence in the cylinder)?  Energy deposited in the gas? Arnero (talk) 11:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Timing