Talk:Armorial of Europe

message: Why is greenland missing in the list of the dependent territories?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:F6:3F2D:D8A:B0F7:9496:4661:5936 (talk) 23:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

message: Where's Lesser achievement, Middle achievement and Greater achievement now? No variety of different versions now?
Chronophobos (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Why so many info deleted

message: This table is in need of cleanup. Somebody changed a headline from "motto" to "text" so most of these entries are now incorrect. The "holder" category is also problematic, since many of these insignia have no official holder unless we consider the "Kingdom of ..." sufficient. It would make more sense to change it to a column mentioning the introduction of the current symbol. Alternatively, the column should be removed completely. Valentinian T / C 11:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: What if there are several office holders and organizations entitled to use a coat of arms, shouldn't all be listed ? (For example - see Latvia, article on coat of arms lists who can use it) -- Xil/talk 10:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While many organizations and offices can use the seal, what we are trying to get at with holders is the following: which official government body or official is the keeper of the current image/dies of the arms. The example I can bring is, in the United States, the seals of the various states are kept in the offices of the Secretary of State. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 10:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Many holders

message: The image :Image:Nagorno-Karabakh Coat of Arms.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Nagorno-Karabakh Coat of Arms.png

message: Turkey does not have an official coat-of-arms. So, I guess it is fair to state it "none" on the table. However, there is a link to Emblems of Turkey on the same row, so that people can see why. --Infestor (talk) 02:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkey 

message: There's only one sovereign UK state. The Scotland region should be taken off the list. It's not a sovereign state or even a dependency, just a region. If it's listed, so too should Bavaria's etc. UK should have one coat of arms listed just like every other country. That's also reality. UK only has 1 coat of arms for UK. Frenchmalawi (talk) 23:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's only 1 UK with 1 Coat of Arms. 

message: The previous versions for the arms of Greece (ie this and this) are speculative. The official specifications, which can be found here, show the arms as being this, and that the shape of the escutcheon is this. The Coat of Arms is almost exclusively monochrome - only the army uses a coloured version, with the wreath in gold. --Michail (blah) 20:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greece 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Should every duplicate word be a link? Every "gules" "fess" "argent" and "sable" links to the same page (respectively). It looks overdone. The one word, I understand to link every time, is "or" to not confuse it with the conjunction. The first mention=link could be enough? Kr3bm4 (talk) 18:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate links