Talk:Nancy Drew (2007 film)

message: Finally someone did something about the vandalism in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.74.105.81 (talk) 05:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: $220 million doesn't seem right for this type of movie. Splamo 23:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Budget

message: Does anyone else think the trivia section could be entirely deleted, without incorporation into other parts of the article? Sophy's Duckling 22:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the trivia section. The two points I removed are as follows; if you can think of a way to incorporate them into the article, please do. 
*The two songs featured on the TV spots are No Secrets' "Kids in America" (performed for Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius) and Rooney's "When Did Your Heart Go Missing?".
*When Nancy and Jane first talk, Jane's child is watching Hi Hi Puffy Ami Yumi, but when the film was released, the show stopped airing on TV.
Sophy's Duckling 06:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: :Image:Nancy drew escaping.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Nancy drew escaping.PNG

message: Anyone want to mention the fact that it hasn't been released on DVD yet, despite the fact that it's been bloody ages since it was released in theatres? Or why it hasn't been put onto DVD?? Just a thought. --Promus Kaa (talk) 05:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The DVD is going to be released March 11, 2008... --Fritz S. (Talk) 08:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

text: it's out now. Gzuckier (talk) 15:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD (Or lack thereof) 

message: Although i read the new yorker review
, i wasn't entirely sure that it was mocking it as much as it was implying that the movie had missed the mark.
“The beautiful Miss Laura Elena Harring. After some ace detective work, I discovered that she was in a film called ‘Mulholland Drive,’ which dealt with similar material. Isn’t that coincidence just a little too suspicious? And the plot leads Nancy to a resort by the name of Twin Palms. Another clue! To sum up, a friend of mine said the film was like Lynch without the lesbians or the dwarves..." 
Clearly anthony lane is taking a shot at julia and her niece in most of the review, but that paragraph almost seems to imply that the movie is either ripping off david lynch or celebrating him but for an audience that has no idea who he is. either way, it doesn't read as mockery as much as artistic license on the part of anthony lane. thoughts?
Nsfmc (talk) 11:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  new yorker 

message: Why is the live link on Dahlia Draycott pointing to the Garfield article ??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.236.32.242 (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Garfield Article 

message: im going to delete the sequal section becuase it been so long and there has been no new comformaion about it --Gerty (talk) 22:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: sequel

message: Ok, I can see why there might be negative fan reception, what with the "Nancy talks with ghosts" angle, but I'm not seeing any references for that.  It should probably be deleted. Banaticus (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan reception?