lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nosferatu (World of Darkness)

message: As to the quality scale, I would say this article is a C. It needs to have the errors fixed, the references cited (more than one! Clans always have lots of info books!) and to be rewritten in an "out of character" style. 
As to importance, I looked at things like a hierarchy as the article said to do- Vampire: The Masqurade (top), Clans in V:TM (high), Bloodlines in V:TM (Mid). As Nosferatu is a Clan and in V:TM Clans are crucial to the game, it's high.
--Lamoxlamae (talk) 23:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating scale

message: The "Clans" in Vampire are equivalent to the character classes in Dungeons and Dragons, they are NOT just a story element. As wiki deems fit to allow the character classes of Dungeons and Dragons to have their own articles (Bard (Dungeons & Dragons), etc), there is no reason why the "character classes" of another exceedingly popular pen-and-paper RPG are not notable enough to have their own articles. Even more so since they ARE both Character Classes AND major elements of the story.
In addition, considering the large amounts of background info and game-based info on each of the clans, it is NOT feasible to merge them all into one article. In fact, if we were to do so the resulting article would be too big and then go against Wiki standards.
Please stop listing all Vampire:The Masquerade articles as non-notable.Flygongengar (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability Explanation and Disagreement about Merging and / or Deletion

message: Where does the information on the clan disciplines for the Nicktuku come from. As far as I was aware they had not been statted out.
Cameronmurtagh (talk) 04:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nictuku
Talk:Crashcarburn

message: They are the same band having only changed their names.
If anyone opposes this, let me know<Br>
Steve37 (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be merged with Tweak 

message: On September 6 and 7, 2008, Crashcarburn and Tweak (band) were merged.  See Tweak's edit history and Crashcarburn's edit history to see what was added when and to where. Also, see Talk:Tweak (band). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 21:35, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Tweak (band) for additional edit history 

message: User:Crashcarburn self-identifies as a band account here. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest template 

message: This page was wrongfully proposed for deletion. It is evident from the above that Tweak and CrashCarBurn are not the same band and should therefore not be merged. Furthermore, CrashCarBurn is a music band just like any other band such as the beatles or linkin park. If it is not blindly obvious why this article should be present on Wikipedia, then we should simply delete all articles about musicians. I mean, (In the words if Wikipedia) 'why the need?'
I feel that this proposition to delete this article is an attack on South African music.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.57.77 (talk) 14:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: An attack on South African music? Please. Anyone who knows anything about South African music would know that this entire page is a shameless fan page for your band. It should be deleted because of the infringements on Wikipedia style. How about you read Linkin Park or the Beatles' entries? They don't list every TV appearance they ever made (yours are slightly unnotable, by the way. I don't see every South African hip-hop artist who ever appeared on Wild Room on Wiki) and they definitely do not boast about their popular MySpace pages. Seriously? "Why the need?" indeed. I don't care about CrashCarBurn. In my opinion, they are such an average band. That alone is not grounds for deletion, but this page needs to be cleaned up seriously to the standards of Wikipedia, otherwise it should be deleted and written again by someone not in the band/someone who writes from an objective perspective as Wikipedia demands. 41.244.133.23 (talk) 13:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod 
Talk:Kaya FM

message: Is the station still broadcasting? The current article makes refrence to the word "was." Yet, there is a external link.Ricky.Adams (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station status 
Talk:Atlantic City (How I Met Your Mother)

message: Real, fake or something in between?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercruz (talk • contribs) 01:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the game that Barney plays

message: Aren't international waters further out than that, like 12 nautical miles?  81.97.76.235 (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  International waters
Talk:Hardwired (novel)

message: According to Template:Infobox_book the Infobox should be about the first edition (1986 from Tor), but this page uses it to include the publisher and ISBN for the 2006 edition from Night Shade Books and the cover of a later edition from Tor. (This per http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1814.) Is there a good reason for this, or was it an oversight? — GCL (talk) 01:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox: Which Editions?
Talk:Slap Bet

message: Do we have any information about when or why the episode title was changed from "Robin Sparkles" to "Slap Bet?" It's airing in syndication as "Robin Sparkles." Dayewalker (talk) 05:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They didn't want the show title to give away the ending so they changed it but changed it back for reruns. Some versions of the article include this information (at the date of this piont). If the article no longer includes this explanation please look back in the history and restore it.  -- Horkana (talk) 01:08, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: In this episode we learn that Robin is afraid of the Seven Darfs or only Doc, rather and that she does not go to malls. When Ted later asks her in bed questions her about not going to malls, he asks her whether she was "trapped under a fake boulder in a mall." In the Disney film version of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs the evil stepmother falls to her death and is probably crushed by a falling boulder. "Source": 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_White_and_the_Seven_Dwarfs_%281937_film%29  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.62.222.15 (talk) 20:11, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references
Talk:World's Greatest Couple

message: I know it's just a little detail, but isn't the "storm trooper" actually a "clone soldier" (I'm German, I don't know the exact expression for it) from Episode 2: Attack of  the Clones?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.226.30.5 (talk) 11:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Stormtrooper (Star Wars)|Stormtrooper]]
Talk:.ir

message: Can we have a section about the 2014 US Court decision about the domain? See here. Mateussf (talk) 00:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Court 

message: 13901390 93.115.127.85 (talk) 11:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  masiha
Talk:Aldrin Justice

message: The DVD features an easter egg a graphic showing one of the infamous building designs. -- Horkana (talk) 04:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, the same design is also seen on , sub-category "Great News: Ted is a friggin PORN STAR!". Maybe we should work it into that article under 'continuity' or somewhere else.
red (talk) 07:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phallic buidling designs
Talk:The Hare-Brained Hypnotist

message: Someone keeps adding unsourced information the short was in Public Domain when it's not. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:38, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. TVTropes is not a reliable source. -  FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain
Talk:Arrivederci, Fiero

message: Jonathan Browning died in 1879, so I doubt he was in this 2007 episode of HIMYM.
--Jacfalcon (talk) 23:46, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled Section
Talk:Orange Warsaw Open

message: There is a long, ongoing discussion at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks.  Tennis expert (talk) 08:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis
Talk:Wrexham City Status

message: I'm just writing to ask why this separate article was created when the subject is noted in the main Wrexham article.  I didn't notice any discussion on the talk page about the split off.... --jonny-mt(t)(c) 08:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no response to jonny-mt, nor any discussion of the month old merger tag, I merged Wrexham City Status into Wrexham. The former seemed to be WP:CFORK. The latter is a good and thorough article. Hult041956 (talk) 23:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question to the Author
Talk:Fightback! (policy)

message: How much of Fightback! got made 
into law in the 11 years of the Howard government?
besides the GST
--~Celco85Celco85 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 08:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much? 
Talk:Geibeltbad Pirna

message: He vandalised this overwritten page and lies that this page must be "clean up".
:Hi there! The  tag is placed on an article needing attention of an experienced editor (as this page does). All this tag will do is encourage more advanced users to add to the article. Hope this helps! --omtay38 22:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism by user : wiggy! 

message: This article seems to have created anonymously by a German speaking editor with very  poor use of English, probably a company employee. The article reeks of self-promotion throughout - what do other editors feel?
If the facility has historical or architectural importance as an outdoor swimming pool (which are very common in Germany), then the article could be retained with an emphasis on these matters.
Compare German Wikipedia article and company website--Lidos (talk) 17:31, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Avalanche dam

message: After some break noticed a redlink in my avalanche series. Laudak 08:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life

message: If the article is in the Category Dams by Type, I am adding WikiProject Dams, even if made by animals (Beavers}, avalanches, civil engineering construction, or weather (Ice).--Dthomsen8 (talk) 08:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Dams
Talk:President of North Macedonia

message: this article may be wrong. Kiro Gligorov was elected president in january 1991 when the official name of the state was still SR Macedonia and while it was still a constituent state of the SFR Yugoslavia --Dzole 08:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Engelbert III, Margrave of Istria

message: Engelbert III. died without his own heirs. The names of "his children" "Henry VIII, Duke of Carinthia" (in facthe was Henry V; ther was no Henry VII among Spanheimers!), Urlic, Count of Laibach, Godfrey and Herman II are actually the names of his brother – carinthian duke Ulric I. of Spanheim. You can check this:  for Henry and this for Herman. 
Engelbert III. also never became margrave of Carniola. Marchio de Chreiburch in the reference is the county of Kraiburg in Bayern- because his mother was from Kraiburg... --Bostjan46 (talk) 21:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Children and title of ''marchio Chreiburch''
Talk:Vendor

message: Vendor does not currently exist, except as a redirect to a disambiguation page.  The vendor should probably redirect here, or we should merge the vendor redirect with this.  Supply chain is the category, much as politician in Fred Smith (politician) is the category.  The article has expanded since the tag was placed, and the tag should probably be removed. Fredsmith2 09:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing the tag, since there was no additional comment Fredsmith2 20:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vendor does not exist

message: Was directing here. I think that is wrong, and have redirected to door to door. But that article is quite under developed. Try searching for history and you will see there is a lot of material out there. I won't do a wikipedia article after seeing the articles that are rejectyed that must have had lots of work (hours put in) just because they only have 2 referencees, or they are not developed as much as someone likes I am not going to spend time developing new ones.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.82.140.162 (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Coincidentally I just clicked "talk" to note that "Commercial Traveller" redirects here. It's a total non sequitur. Commercial Travelling as an article in its own right is essential, there have been entire books written since the 1860s about Commercial Travelling, the history and the topic are vast. It also differs from door to door selling, which implies visits to non-commercial end users at their place of residence. The Commercial Traveller developed regular rounds visiting, as the title implies, commercial end users at their place of business. JohnHarris (talk) 21:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Travelling salesman
Talk:Killer Karl Krupp

message: https://www.whenitwascool.com/history-of-wrestling-1958 
I see the name listed for 3-17 and 6-14 to name a couple. Of course I have no idea who it was wrestling under that name, but regardless, it contradicts the idea that the persona was developed in the 1970’s. 69.120.49.191 (talk) 00:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link says Ludwig Von Krupp was wrestling in 1958
Talk:Martin Carney

message: Is Martin Carney the Gaelic footballer, and Martin Carney the actor, one and the same person? If so, can someone clarify this article's text, and provide references.... Thanks! Carbonix (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Actor...?
Talk:Taneyev Quartet

message: I changed the name of the article from “Leningrad Taneiev Quartet” to “Taneyev Quartet,” and also made a redirect from the former name to the latter. The previous transliteration of the ensemble’s namesake, while arguably more accurate, is not the one commonly used to refer to it. Whether on records or in writing, they have only ever been referred to as the Taneyev Quartet, at least in English. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 05:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Taneyev”
Talk:The Dance of Eternity

message: As I first read it as "as many as 100 different time signatures" (implying that [as many as] 100 time signatures are used), I feel that this sentence seems poorly worded, and doesn't really specify how progressive the song is; I could make a song that alternates between 5/4 and 4/4 fifty times and say it has "100 time signature changes". Could someone find exactly which time signatures this song uses?~~NaN 16:12, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well now the statement is 123 time signature changes. This is really awkward and there are no citations either. As far as the used time signatures go, a perfect seeming Guitar Pro tab from ultimate-guitar.com has many weird time signatures such as 11/4, 17/16, 7/4, 7/16,etc. But calculating no. of time signature changes is a useless remark, really. Also, the lack of citations is a major issue. I believe there should be a template to that effect inserted into the article.Leif edling (talk) 10:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 6 min 13 sec = 373 sec. With 123 different time signatures it makes a change every 3 sec approximatively ! It seems a lot ! Or did I miss something ? In any case, such a great song it is. Zertrin (blabla) 18:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

text: If you're interested in checking it (I haven't) or providing a citation, here's Mike Portnoy with the actual chart: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwkcRTNMsWs 213.213.216.132 (talk) 22:56, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "..as many as 100 time signature changes"
Talk:Kimco Realty

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://investors.kimcorealty.com/od.aspx?iid=102965. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John Nagle (talk) 20:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Re Wikipedia email from .  Please see WP:OWN, and read the rules about Wikipedia copyright rules.  Pasting information from a corporate site into Wikipedia is not permitted. --John Nagle (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The redirect Munsey Park Plaza has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 04:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Munsey Park Plaza]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Is It a Sin

message: Either samples or shares a very similar riff with U2 - Streets with no name. 
I'm putting it in the article to provoke some discussion. Gazzat5 (talk) 11:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Bathing Beauty

message: This links to some other movie synopsis. Cactusjump (talk) 17:26, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: TCM External Link Wrong 
Talk:Brock's Monument

message: Just going through "Memoirs of Isaac Brock" and notice that the first monument is described as "from the base to the summit one hundred and twenty-seven feet". Is this a mistake in this source? Natty10000 (talk) 03:57, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Monument Height: 135' or 127'?
Talk:David Abudarham

message: "in spite of occasional errors, as, for instance, his derivation of minḥah from menaḥ yom"
Isn't that a Drush, not meant as a grammatical fact?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.67.2.216 (talk) 11:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds correct. Since it is unsourced in the article, I think the simplest thing is just to remove it. Text for reference Ar2332 (talk) 17:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Kilcummin, County Mayo

message: hello administrators my name is philip cummings born liverpool england 1940. one of you put the word citation next to the sentence about the sign post which i put on the main artical about kilcummin. i go to kilcummin every july so this july i will take a photo of the sign post and put it on the main artical if that is ok whith you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User names:Pcummin and philylavell ] (talk • contribs) 15:42, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. I did not add that information. That information was added by a user called Paramedic030. See this edit. Paramedic030 was the editor who created the article in the first place. I therefore do not have the answer to your question. If you think this data is suspect or incorrect, then we should remove it. Guliolopez (talk) 15:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Hi. That sounds fair enough to me! Good stuff. Guliolopez (talk) 14:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

text: Hi. I have added a "needs citation" tag to the relevant section of the article. If not addressed shortly we can reword/change the relevant section. Please propose an alternative wording on this talk page, and I will help you update the offending section. Guliolopez (talk) 16:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Sounds look a good idea. Safe travels and look forward to hearing back from you in August. Guliolopez (talk) 17:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Yup. Agreed. That was tagged for a long time. Guliolopez (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Polybutylene

message: The link to support the edit of 19:51, 23 October 2007 by Jmcharry that "polybutylene plumbing is no longer approved by the IPC" does not seem to support this. It simply lists amendments removing polybutylene from a table.Richardewing 09:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Clean-up needed here. Too many spam links, including new additions recently added and reverted.Wilson44691 (talk) 09:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam links 

message: *Most of the sources in this article are from groups that are involved in the inspection, repair or replacement business.  —Chris Capoccia  T⁄C 12:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources

message: currently, the article reads: "Polybutylene plumbing was used in 6 to 10 million homes built in the United States from 1970 to the mid-1990s" and cites Pacific Crest Inspections. Hensler is a much more reliable source and explains on page 394, note 3 that U.S. Brass claimed 6 million in an advertisement, but Shell Oil in an official response to an interogatory estimated 4.7 million.  —Chris Capoccia  T⁄C 12:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious source and figure for number of homes affected 

message: “Not be confused” should be: not to be 71.82.118.133 (talk) 14:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing word
Talk:Who Controls the Internet?

message: This article does not answer the question it raises... "Who Controls the Internet?" but instead goes off in a tangent over the history of the Internet!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.228.108.236 (talk) 16:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question raised not answered!

message: This is a good article that well explains the concepts in the book, I don't see what further references are required? 141.155.169.21 (talk) 09:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been no action on the POV-check request since it was added almost three years ago now.  I made a few changes to the article, added a second review and reworded the initial review to use different quotes with little or no editorial comment added.  We need to remember that it is the article that should have a neutral POV and not the book that the article is reviewing. I've removed the POV-check template. Jeff Ogden (talk) 23:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial comments 

message: I am the co-author of this book.   As it stands it seems relatively fair and I like the pictures.   Jack may feel differently.   If there are any questions post here and I can answer Superwuster (talk) 21:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome, welcome to Wikipedia. groupuscule (talk) 22:38, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author Comments 

message: sigh (PeacePeace (talk) 18:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  after reading the article I still don't know how the heck the internet is controlled by anyones 

message: The link in Reference 1 does not go to "anything". (PeacePeace (talk) 18:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The link in Reference 1 does not go to "anything". 

message: The basis answer to this is null as we all as human governes the imernet and rule it as a body. 105.112.149.81 (talk) 15:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who rules the internet