lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moral evil

message: The following was added to the article page by 81.79.66.96 (Talk) 11:32 10 October 2006 and has been moved to this Talk page. Pawl 15:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment moved from encyclopedia page

message: This is the bibliography for the sources I will be adding to the article. 
1. Archer, A. (2016). Evil and Moral Detachment: Further Reflections on the Mirror Thesis. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 24(2), 201–218.
2. Brook, R. (2007). Deontology, Paradox, and Moral Evil. Social Theory and Practice: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(3), 431–440.
3. Calder, T. (2013). Is Evil Just Very Wrong? Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 163(1), 177–196.
Santanavictianny (talk) 19:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing and expanding 

message: There's not much of a lead. The writing is strong and remains neutral whilst giving information on moral evil. It is pretty balanced because it doesn't just focus on one aspect of morals, war is mentioned as well as murder etc. The sources seem credible, bbc news and a journal. The bbc article offers adequate information that's straight to the point, a well job of citing it without focusing too much on the religious aspect was done. KaylaBirch (talk) 15:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WCI Peer Review  

message: "The Holocaust is seen as morally worse than the Spanish Influenza epidemic although …"
How would a natural epidemic be morally wrong on any level? Who would be the immoral party? Nature? The Holocaust actually had human perpetrators who defied the moral expectations of humans. The Spanish Flu epidemic was perpetrated by germs. Are people holding germs to moral standards now? There has to be a better comparison here. 199.120.30.200 (talk) 15:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish Influenza - Holocaust comparison 

message: Bengal starvation should be added to the allied history of WW2 CMarrs (talk) 02:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holocaust
Talk:Bad Planet

message: A reliable source link has been added to the Reception section that proves the rating to IGN from the actual website, but I can't find anything from Cinescape and it's being revered/undo for no reason other than to vandalize the page.108.82.13.252 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Batman: Shadow of the Bat

message: Should this article really be considered a stub? I would like some input before taking away this status. 174.94.0.81 (talk) 19:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub status?
Talk:Luisa Casati

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! Merged from and added redirect to: Luisa Amman, Marchesa Casati ... some cleanup is still needed on this new page. JubalHarshaw 15:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some cleanup done, and a fabulous image added. (The painting is owned by Andrew Lloyd Webber and was featured in the exhibition of artworks from his collection at the Royal Academy in 2003). Charivari 05:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: The style of this article strikes me as being way to hagiographic and needs to be toned down a bit. The whole article provides few sources, and those that do exist mostly lead to dead website links. Ashmoo (talk) 14:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: Robert Fulford was impressed by it as a schoolboy.
:This mention seems insignificant. Valetude (talk) 09:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert who?
Talk:Oceanside Transit Center

message: As the existing page points out "Oceanside Transit Center, which is also the northern terminus of the San Diego Coaster, the southern terminus of the Metrolink Orange County Line and Inland Empire-Orange County Line, and the western terminus of the Oceanside-Escondido Sprinter.[2]" This elevates it beyond a simple "(Amtrak Station)" status and makes it one of [if not the] most strategic rail-light-rail Transit Centers in all of Southern California. I suggest that the page be renamed "Oceanside Transit Center" or a separate page be created to deal with the commuter as well as Amtrak services provided at this station. Bobkiger (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:HMS Fox (1893)

message: There is an image of this ship here:
http://www.worldwar1.co.uk/light-cruiser/hms-Astraea.html
I'm not familiar with the process of obtaining permission and uploading an image... Psarj 16:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

message: http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/hms-fox-18961898-24669
©Geni 00:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible pic
Talk:Lost City (novel)

message: The summary only includes the first few chapters and is far too detailed describing them.  As such the article is incredibly misleading.  As I haven't yet finished reading the novel can somebody else please do something about this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamandrewssoul (talk • contribs) 02:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary
Talk:Boat race (game)

message: Hi,
I'm new here, and still learning the lay-of-the-land as it were, but feel that much of the text included in the Perth section of this page is un-noteworth and written very much like a 'review'. As such, it may need to be revised to fit the Wikipedia style guide etc. Any comments?
ABVS
:I have removed this section.Ozdaren 01:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I've just done a major revision, removing any reference to specific rules and generalising the two general types of race: one-direction and up-and-back. No campus-specific rules should be included on this page. Aspirex 06:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised 

message: A recent edit to this page described 1-on-1 skol-offs being described as Boat Races in a certain university. In my experience, Boat Racing is specifically between teams of usually at least three or four, and one-one-one skolling is completely separate.
If anybody can provide references to this sort of drinking being described as "boat racing" in more than just one region, then the article should be redesigned into two sections entitled "Team vs Team Boat Racing" and "One vs One Boat Racing." Otherwise, no reference should be made to this one-on-one style. Aspirex 09:43, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1-on-1 Boat Races 

message: Hi,  I boldly removed a large amount of unsourced material, (The diff is here ) and Aspirex has restored it asking for a discussion here.  Well let's have a discussion - but not about whether unsourced material belongs in Wikipedia. In an article of this kind it is especially important to source material since so many variations of the "rules" exist.  For example - in my experience boat racing is a trial of strength akin to a tug of war played in the context of drinking.  Totally different to what is in the article.  But, I can't source this - so it doesn't belong in the article.  Neither does the other detailed but unsourced information given in the article - take the section "basic rules" for example.  No sources.  None.  So - let's have some sourced material back in the article, and we can discuss here how we handle the variety of sourced material.    Regards, Springnuts (talk) 19:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 
Talk:Fragile (Saron Gas album)

message: Track 2 goes by 2 names depending on where you look. On the back of the album cover it lists the title as just "Tea". But in the booklet with lyrics it lists it as "69 Tea" as does the album details at Album details. Not sure which should be listed. The track appears on Disclaimer II as 69 Tea but some tracks on this Saron Gas album were rewritten lyrically or musically to appear on later albums.
I've got the standard album, and on the back of the cover it's stated as "69 Tea". I've never heard/seen it without the numerical prefix. 81.208.161.114
I have a copy with the bonus tracks, and it has it listed only as "Tea". There are also asterix' beside each of the songs that were redone on their next album.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.3.65 (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Association of Mouth and Foot Painting Artists of the World

message: I propose that the article, Mouth And Foot Painting Artists, be merged into this one. The official name of the organisation is the Association of Mouth and Foot Painting Artists of the World, so I think that this page is where the content should be. --Portnadler 16:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger

message: Wikipedia should provide a copy of the ruling mentioned in the Litigation [I presume he is referring to this] section that is translated into English for Americans to read for themselves. [preceding unsigned comment was made by user John8988 in the Article page. This comment was edited and moved to the talk page at (17:20, 17 June 2014) (editor: 2601:0:800:4F:21C:23FF:FE84:5FF3), while the original edit that created the aforementioned comment was made at (08:22, 17 January 2014)]. Okay, so the comment has been moved and documented. John, please use the talk page next time. 2601:0:800:4F:21C:23FF:FE84:5FF3 (talk) 17:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translate the ruling
Talk:Che!

message: According to the pages that link here (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Che%21) this article should be about the movie "Che!", it shouldn't redirect to Che Guevara! --Vlad|-> 16:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This shouldn't be a redirect!

message: Although the ! complicates the issue, WP:NCF suggests Che! (1969 film) is required due to the newer film Che (2008 film). In ictu oculi (talk) 04:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NCF]]
Talk:Ty Templeton

message: Links to "Stig's Inferno" simply redirect to this page, including links for the series on this page. Is this an error or intentional?64.222.94.132 (talk) 16:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stig's Inferno

message: According to the "about" on his blog, his birth year is actually 1962.  What's the 1963 source? -- 130.15.49.147 (talk) 21:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate incorrect?
Talk:Robert Kingston Scott

message: I live near Napoleon, Ohio where Gov. Scott is buried.  While talking to my lawyer who is also a local historian I mentioned that the phrase "Getting away Scott free" had its origins with Gov. Scott's murder trial as mentioned in this article.  He disagreed and thought the phrase was related to Scottish people.
Wikipedia itself has an article on the phrase and says it has to do with an old word meaning taxes.  []
So while my lawyer/local historian and the other Wikipedia article disagee over the true origin of the phrase, both deny that it has anything to do with Gov. Robert K. Scott as is stated in this article.
71.50.48.187 (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible inaccuracy in this article 

message: '“The Roughs” boarded the Wabash Railroad bound for Napoleon with an anonymous gift of two barrels of whiskey and all thoughts of justice were washed away.'
Not clear which side the Roughs were on, and who was appeased by the gift of whisky. Clarify, please. Valetude (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear
Talk:Watchdogs (Marvel Comics)

message: The statement regarding the recent controversy over the depiction of the Tea Party engaged in a protest in an issue of Captain America is described and reported in sources incorrectly.  Initial reports confused the separate plotlines.  The actual comic does not connect the protesters with the Watchdogs.  The protesters are an isolated event that the protagonists pass by while searching for and and infiltrating the Watchdogs.  Likewise, no storyline was pulled.  The sign that associated the protesters with the Tea Party movement was changed.  The controversy, if any, has no bearing the Watchdog page, and should either be reserved for placement on Marvel Comics or Joe Quesada.Luminum (talk) 07:41, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Watchdog Controversy
Talk:Heap (comics)

message: The editor Captainmagic, who has been on Wikipedia since 2007 and is not a newbie, has had editors post on his talk page since 2009 the complaint that he does not verify his claims with reliable-source citation. He has been adding POV about the Hulk and Rick Jones, as well as trivia. I have posted on his talk page that non-verified, POV edits are not in keeping with Wikipedia policy. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits by User:Captainmagic

message: The entry for Sturgeon’s short story “It!” refers to The Heap, so it seems odd to me that this entry doesn’t also point to that one. But I wasn’t sure if there was a reason to avoid mentioning that story here. Elysdir (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, go ahead and do it! Toughpigs (talk) 09:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we link to Sturgeon’s “It!”?
Talk:Taiwan Power Company F.C.

message: The photo shows they wear black short. -- scchiang 12:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know...I just copied the colors from the topic in the Chinese Wikipedia. Maybe they're allowed to wear crosses between their home and away uniforms? -- Asdf1248 14:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home color 

message: I have some question about the spellings of Hsu Xiao-bao and Wu Guo-xiao. Do they really use Hanyu Pinyin in their name spellings? Btw, I corrected some spellings according to List of Taiwanese footballers, in which I collected previous squad lists of Chinese Taipei from Google Search. -- scchiang 06:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know...I just did what seemed to sound right... -- Asdf1248 06:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I modified the spellings to Wade-Giles first because most Taiwanese name spellings use it in my experience. The mapping table between Zhuyin and Wade-Giles could be found here. Let's see if their formal spellings could be found in the future. -- scchiang 06:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Player name spelling
Talk:Jesús de Polanco

message: I'm afraid this article is clearly biased in that almost every fact stated is considered from a point of view which is clearly aligned with critics of Prisa Group (Spanish Popular Party and the conservative media).
I'm not really trying to defend Prisa Group from this criticism, mostly because in order to do so, I should first gather enough information, which I now don't have the time to. But I do think that this could and should be strongly modified (specially in what concerns a supposed "conspiracy" of the Socialist Party and the media which is considered to be next to). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.60.140.81 (talk • contribs) 
:Certainly POV, however as the article is about Jesús de Polanco could more biographical content be added. → friedfish 14:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article POV

message: I have classified this article as a stub due to its level of detail and organisation. It can be expanded especially with information about his life prior to the start of his empire and how he built it. Capitalistroadster 19:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification
Talk:Shelling of Mainila

message: The word "Bombardment" should be used for the title instead of shelling, which can refer to alot of different things. The Shelling of Yeonpyeong article was renamed for this reason.--$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 03:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Soviets specifically claimed Finnish forces used artillery to attack the village so shelling is appropriate. Ape89 (talk) 09:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I think the revisionist nature of accounting whole Winter War to Stalin can lead even to opinions which mr. Yatsenyuk propagates, and these are more dangerous. I would propose to stay in this theme united and firm: not to allow differences to dissolve basic facts. 1) USSR and GB won II. world war over aggressor - puchist Hitler 2) Finland was aly of nazzi Germany with, and it was aggressive pact..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.168.184.7 (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No changes needed.Problems with your arguments include the facts that at the time due to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact Soviets and Nazis were next best thing to being allied and had just used that aggressive pact to invade and occupy Poland and then even held joint victory parades... And it was that pact between the Soviet Union and the Nazi Germany which directly led to the Winter War as well as to Soviet occupation of the Baltic states. USSR did launch an unprovoked war of an aggression against Finland using the Mainila shelling as an excuse so USSR was an aggressor in the Winter War no matter how you try to twist it. And UK together with France were just about to launch their attacks against the USSR due to the Winter War so those countries were certainly not allies of any sort at the time. As to the Finnish-German relations - Germany was at the time one of the few countries that prevented supply shipments from reaching Finland, interning the supplies - act that seriously hurt Finnish war efforts - so Finland and Germany were most definitely not in any way allied during the Winter War. Germans actually suggested that they could support & supply Soviet subs operating against Finnish civilian ships and possibly even lay naval mines to the Finnish waters. So unless it wasn't clear neither of your facts were true at the time of the incident in question. - Wanderer602 (talk) 17:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Yatsenyuk and Ukraine
Talk:Heckler & Koch HK CAWS

message: I started expanding this article as requested in the stub note. I copied the Firearms infobox over from another article, but I have been unable to upload a picture of the HK CAWS to use. Please can someone correct the image? It currently displays a completely different firearm.
81.35.232.18 (talk) 13:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Image Needed 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Close Assault Weapon System. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 23:36, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Close Assault Weapon System" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The page image is a low-poly, low-res 3D model of the H&K CAWS listed as "original work" by the uploader. Needs an actual photograph of the real gun. 99.41.163.253 (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image isn't real
Talk:MP-444 Bagira

message: BF2S (a Battlefield 2 stats website) as a source? I think there are some more, uh, authoritative sources out there, considering Battlefield 2 isn't exactly strict with naming its weapons. Recoil.30 22:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:No 7 Mk1 Dingbat mine

message: I remember being taught to lay the Dingbat about 30 years ago, and our instructor telling us that originally they had contained glass, the idea being that the glass shards would enter the bloodstream and be transported to the heart, which they would then puncture. "Unfortunately," however, glass has the "disadvantage" of showing up on x-rays, which meant there was a "risk" that a surgeon might be able to remove them before they could do their job.
Can anyone confirm/refute this and, if so, add a couple of lines on the topic?
[Articles have to be NPOV, talk entries do not. Mine isn't. My ideas have developed over the last 30 years :-)] --UrsusMaximus (talk) 19:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's inside these things?
Talk:Oscar Zariski

message: "born Oscher Zaritsky" in the lead, but "born Osher Zaritsky" in the first section; why? Boris Tsirelson (talk) 09:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Parikh's biography uses "Ascher." Presumably these are all just differing transliterations. We should be consistent, I agree. Maybe there's guidance in the style article "Romanization of Russian." Ishboyfay (talk) 14:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscher or Osher?
Talk:Solomon Lefschetz

message: ==Untitled==
A note should be added about Lefschetz's post-retirement contributions. Tcisco 18:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lefschetz center for dynamical systems

message: A note should be added about Lefschetz's post-retirement contributions. Tcisco 18:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On the right it says: "Nationality: Russian", yet the article begins with "was an American mathematician…". Does this actually make sense? 89.27.85.175 (talk) 15:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality
Talk:Michael Artin

message: Was he born in Germany? Michael Hardy (talk) 00:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the box on the right, "Armenian" changes to "American English", with the cursor on it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.184.204 (talk) 14:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Rational arithmetic

message: Todo:
* sections: addition, ...
* treatment of square root
* context
----
How does this page relate to the section arithmetic with fractions at Fraction (mathematics)? That seems to be a more complete treatment of the subject. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 03:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hadn't looked that closely at Fraction (mathematics). That's a nice page. Maybe we should just redirect? --Jake 05:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Rational number is a more logical target, so I redirected this page there. However, fraction (mathematics) has a better explanation of how to add and multiply fractions, so perhaps some of that can be used to improve the rational number page. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 12:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think fraction has a much better treatment and when you actually try to talk about how arithmetic is done with rationals it is really all about fractions. So I switched the redirect there. Thatnks Jitse for point that page out to me. ---Jake 22:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jane Shore

message: This article has been classified as a start. It needs further sourcing. Capitalistroadster 01:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification

message: There is a character called Mistress Shore in the 1962 Roger Corman film "Tower of London" played by Sandra Knight.
Basesurge (talk) 10:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More Films

message: There is no contemporary evidence that Elizabeth Lambert/Shore ever chose to call herself "Jane". All early references to her (More & c) are as "Shore's wife". By the late 16C her real first name seems to have been forgotten: Jane was invented for one of her appearances in literature. I suggest this ought to be examined more thoroughly. I'm also worried by references to out-of-date works that look as if they may be highly romanticised (such as Thompson). -- Silverwhistle (talk) 13:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: A "protectionist government" is usually one that believes in trade protection.  I don't think that's what you mean.
4.249.63.80 (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  what kind of government? 

message: The text says 'lighthearted Shore and stern Richard' - is there proof for the adjectives? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descriptions 

message: Why is Jane described as "lighthearted", whereas Richard lll is portrayed as "stern". Is there any historical evidence they were like this or, is this just bias? Yellowgirl44x44 (talk) 20:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Paul Murray Kendall, who is cited with the sentence referenced, described them this way. History Lunatic (talk) 12:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a biased description
Talk:Thomas Grey, 1st Marquess of Dorset

message: How can he be ...known as Lord Ferrers de Groby between 1461 and 1471...
if it was only ...[i]n January 1482/3 on the death of his grandmother Elizabeth, [that] he became Lord Ferrers of Groby. Looks like a mix up in the dates. Webhat (talk) 05:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord Ferrers de Groby