lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:U.S. Route 66 in Missouri

message: From this 1969 map
*Route 66, US 71, Route 171 (probably split at Old 66 Boulevard west of CR-180), Route 96 through Joplin and Webb City to west of Springfield (unclear if it joined I-44 via Route 96 or Route 266 - definitely Route 96 on 1969 USGS)
*I-44 at Springfield
*I-44 at Lebanon
*I-44 at Rolla
*Route 366, Route 30 and I-55 into Illinois (I-44 was not built yet)
So it's likely that when US 66 was decommissioned in Missouri in 1979 (to US 71) and 1985 (the rest of the way), it was only separate from I-44 west of Springfield.  says that it actually used Route 66 all the way to I-44 east of Joplin. Anyone know for sure? --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 08:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status in 1969

message: has some details on the St. Louis alignments. --NE2 16:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some history

message: In addition to the main route, the following routes are signed with years specified:
*1930-1955 from Main/2nd in Joplin to Broadway/Madison in Webb City (this was U.S. Route 66 Alternate)
*1947-1975 in Joplin from Main/7th to Range Line/Zora (though it's labeled as US 66 on the 1945-46 official)
*1936-1970 from Bypass/Chestnut to Glenstone/Kearney in Springfield
*1926-1928 from Division/Glenstone in Springfield to Route 125/OO in Strafford
*1926-1933 from I-44 Bus./Route 100 in Gray Summit to Choteau/Tucker? in St. Louis
*1936-1965 from Lindbergh/Watson in Sunset Hills to the state line on the new Chain of Rocks Bridge (this was U.S. Route 66 Bypass after ca. 1956)
and perhaps others.
The main route is signed along the following:
*U.S. Route 71 Business (Joplin, Missouri), bypassed by 1947-1975 route
*U.S. Route 66 Business (Webb City, Missouri), bypassed ca. 1953 by what's now mostly freeway (actually the old US 66 is signed, which did not all become US 66 Bus.)
*U.S. Route 66 Business (Springfield, Missouri), bypassed by 1936-1970 route
*U.S. Route 66 Business (Lebanon, Missouri), bypassed ca. 1958 by current I-44
*U.S. Route 66 Business (Waynesville, Missouri), bypassed ca. 1954 by current I-44
*U.S. Route 66 Business (Rolla, Missouri), bypassed ca. 1955 by current I-44
*U.S. Route 66 Business (Pacific, Missouri), bypassed ca. 1964 by current I-44
--NE2 23:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signed routes in Missouri
Talk:Mercedes Scelba-Shorte

message: When did Yoanna and Mercedes do a commercial for Chevy Equinox? Elcda0 02:32, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is inherantly contradictoary — it says she was born in California and then also says she was born in New Jersey. Which one is it? Páll (Die pienk olifant) 03:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Is this an encyclopedia article or a resume? 204.69.40.13 16:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oy 

message: For crying out loud it shouldnt be hard to get a picture of this women when she was on a show on a major network (with little viewers lol). Im sure we can find something thats under fair use  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.31.254 (talk) 07:03, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture 
Talk:List of integrals of inverse trigonometric functions

message: Representing the inverse of sine by sin^-1 can be confusing because arcsin does not equal 1/sin  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.249.250 (talk) 14:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inverse of sine 

message: Is this edit vandalism?  Thanks, delldot talk 18:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: There are some problems with these edits to the Arcsecant function integration formulas section.
:1. The rewrite
::\mathrm{arctanh}\left( \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{a^{2} x^{2}}}\right) \to \mathrm{arccosh}(|a x|)
:does simplify the formulae - so ok.
:2. The change of \scriptstyle{a \to \frac{1}{a}} is arbitrary, makes the section inconsistent with the others and two errors have been introduced in the process (two terms are out by a factor of \scriptstyle{a}). The formulae in this section were all correct before, as may be verified by differentiation.
:3. The \scriptstyle{(x^2 \mathrm{arcsec}(a x))} formula is (strictly) redundant given the \scriptstyle{(x^m \mathrm{arcsec}(a x))} formula, but the removal of the former of these makes the section inconsistent with the others. Also, the \scriptstyle{x^m} formula has an integral on the right hand side, and it is convenient to have this evaluated for small \scriptstyle{m}.
So I shall revert some or all of these changes. --catslash (talk) 01:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits to ''Arcsecant function integration formulas''
Talk:Matt Bissonette (musician)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Unopposed move   (t · c) buidhe 23:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Matt Bissonette →  – Back when this Matt Bissonette was the only one with a standalone article, and the American writer and Navy SEAL Matt Bissonnette just had a redirect to his book instead of a standalone BLP of him as a person, just hatnoting made sense — however, there is now also an article about the filmmaker and screenwriter Matt Bissonnette (director), with the plain title Matt Bissonnette converted from a redirect to the book into a disambiguation page, so there are now three Matt Bisson(n)ettes instead of just two. The problem with this is that the Bissonette and Bissonnette spellings are regularly confused with each other, and it is not at all difficult to find sources that refer to the film director or the Navy SEAL with one n instead of two, or to the musician with two n's instead of one — see, for example, "Death of a Ladies’ Man star Gabriel Byrne and director Matt Bissonette talk about the horror of addiction, "The first front-row version of that fateful night in Abbottabad came from the book No Easy Day by Matt Bissonette" and "John Mahon, Kim Bullard, and Matt Bissonnette sound as if they were always with Elton from Day 1". So the musician should be disambiguated as if his name were spelled the same as the other two, with the plain title redirected to the disambiguation page at Matt Bissonnette, because there's a clear pattern of people not always being able to keep it straight who has which spelling. Bearcat (talk) 21:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 March 2021
Talk:Little Audrey

message: Does he have a last name mentioned like Audrey's was? AweCo (talk) 02:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Melvin

message: I added some information on the notorious "Little Audrey laughed and laughed" jokes that were so popular in the 1930's and '40s. and put it at the top of the article because that's where Famous got the name after all. Ericl (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The original version
Talk:Michael Smith (musician)

message: Other musicians named Michael Smith include the singer-songwriter from Chicago (Michael Peter Smith), as well as a Christian musician.  I group I belong to booked the first one, and had some disappointed customers looking for the second one.  Didn't see any dub fans in the audience, that I know of.Pustelnik 16:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The foregoing (unsigned) suggestion has been adopted; no further work needed at present. --AndrewHowse (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Barely Legal (magazine)

message: Is the graphic description in this entry really warranted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.49.54.79 (talk • contribs).
:Wikipedia is not censored for minors. I am not into this sort of magazine, but if this is a factual description of what it contains it should be included in this article. If we are going to have articles about pornography, why should they be any less descriptive than articles on other topics? Quepasahombre 03:50, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed parts of the descriptions before you reverted, not to censor them, but because they didn't add any information. The article already says that it's a porn magazine that shows women masturbating, so it's redundant to have a laundry list of the parts of themselves that they touch etc. It's not worth getting into an edit war, though. PseudoAnon 05:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Monsoon

message: Though it doesn't make it any better, having just checked the bands webpage, the violation is actually from the bands official bio at http://www.newmonsoon.com/bio/index.html . I am guessing the original creator of this article took it from there.--Moeron 03:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created a new page in the temp section that has citations. There are also many article as Jambase.com that I can use to expand the article with citations in the future (I am tired tonight, haha).--Moeron 03:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation
Talk:Relaxed stability

message: What does "fly very "flat" to the air as well" mean? Amcfreely 03:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Low angle of attack?? !jim 11:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume so. This article reads like a junior high student wrote it... I'll revisit it in the next few weeks with what I've learned in my aerodynamics courses, using several different sources. Hopefully that will clean it up. ericg ✈ 02:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing phrase

message: The F-16 article mentions the term relaxed static stability.  Is that the same as relaxed stability?  70.252.96.143 (talk) 01:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Relaxed Static Stability

message: How marginally stable does an aircraft have to be to be considered having "relaxed stability"? Does the P-39 Airacobra count? If constant vigilance is required of the pilot to maintain controlled flight does that count? Benjamin S. Kelsey evaluated a Spitfire Mark V and found it uncomfortably close to the margin of stability—does that count? Binksternet (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the line between 'marginally stable' and 'relaxed stability' 

message: High and low relative to what? Is the determining factor the location of wing relative to the center of gravity, or is the determining factor whether there is more sail area below/above the wing? (e.g., Would a plane be stable with a lightweight fuselage below the wing and a very low cross section counterweight mounted very high above the wing?) Could someone explain in slightly more detail how the sideslip/crosswind produces the feedback force in either case? Cesiumfrog (talk) 00:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  high/low wing 

message: If this article has been written due to the Saab JAS 39 Gripen article, then "relaxed" is wrong word. Swedish developers and media has in Swedish used the word "instabil tyngdpunkt", which should be translated as "instabile point of gravity". If a physical body has an instabile point of gravity, means that the point of gravity moves down if the object moves, while a stabile point of gravity means that the point of gravity moves up if the object is moved. (an object can though be stabile in one direction and instabile in an other direction). If a pen is standing up on a table (or on whatever surface), will its point of gravity fall, except for the very short initial part of the move, and when the move causes the point of gravity to fall, then also the pen will fall. If the pen lies down, will its point of gravity only rise though (and after a moving the pen a bit up, gravity will force it down again). Perhaps there is a phenomenon that indeed is called "relaxed point of gravity", but I believe "instabile point of gravity" is what this is about. Boeing720 (talk) 01:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  translational troubles ?
Talk:Peter Watson (arts benefactor)

message: I don't know what to call him, to disambiguate from Peter Watson the bishop. "Art collector"? Benefactor? Publisher? Bon vivant? Whatever he was, he was behind the scenes one of the most significant cultural figures of the art and literary world in his time. Horizon is still a landmark.Fnarf999 03:26, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michigan Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument

message: This was copied from http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/travel/detroit/d15.htm , which is a U.S. Government site, and is public domain --rogerd 03:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hupmobile

message: After the demise of the Cord Corporation in 1937, Norman De Vaux was able to buy the 810/812 body dies (for $40,000, iirc). He tried to push a car of his own, again (he already did before with the short-lived De Vaux in 1932). When this failed he sold the dies to Hupp (and the premises in Oakland were he planned production of his De-Vo to GM). So, the dies came not buy straight away from Cord. Further, there were many problems with them: They had been stored for a time in the open, they were heavily used (which resulted in extensive fixing for many panels) and Hupmobile had to create a one-piece die for the sedan roof (which at Cord was welded together from several panels). All this delayed the Hupp Skylark, and it cost money. --Chief tin cloud (talk) 11:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, the dies weren't much good for mass-production in any case (tho, yet again, I don't recall where I came across that little tidbit :( ).  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  00:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cord body dies

message: "free wheeling?"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.240.167 (talk) 08:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I linked it to its article. — ¾-10 19:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  And what the heck is  
Talk:USSA

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bruce_Gabrielson
Read for background on this page. A user on Wikipedia is making entires all over Wiki to use as advertising for his businesses and linking them all together.
Look at the users contributions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Hbsnake1
MOST have been slated for deletion by Admins on Wikipedia
: This is not a good reason, by itself, to prod this disambiguation page:
# Many of these AfDs are still in progress so there isn't yet consensus that the pages in question will be deleted
# Not all of the pages listed on this disambiguation page are up for AfD
# Given that the listed pages are themselves in AfD, it was never likely that deleting this page would be uncontroversial, so AfD would have been a better choice than Prod
:Gwernol 03:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now read this issue through. Even if the United States Surfing Association article gets deleted, there are at least 2 valid links on this disambiguation page. Even though this page was originally made by Hbsnake1, it was altered and modified by a few other users and is now a useful disambiguation page. My advice is to not bother taking this to AfD, since I'd imagine that most users would vote for this disambig page to be kept. Please don't add the PROD tag again. DarthVader 04:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PROD tag
Talk:Humpty Dumpty (comics)

message: Actually, I'm not sure if the character in Arkham Asylum: Living Hell is the same person as the original Superboy foe. I don't have the source material from the '50s and, so far, info on the web is sketchy. However, if there does turn out to be two of them, I think that the original character deserves at least a mention. GentlemanGhost 10:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention the Jack of Fables character or the comics adaptations of Alice in Wonderland. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 23:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than one? 

message: The List of Batman villains page has HD listed as first appearing in Detective Comics #140 (October 1948). Is this correct, and if so a different Humpty Dumpty than the Superboy villain? --Noclevername (talk) 22:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First debut

message: Although he isn't named, could the large prisoner lying on the floor with the coloring book in the first few minutes of 'The Batman vs. Dracula be Humpty Dumpty?  The_Iconoclast (talk) 03:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Humpty Dumpty cameo in ''The Batman'' movie
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Kurt Leyman

message: I dissagree with what DMorpheus says when he says that "and continues to make, numerous personal attacks" He does not provide any proof of his statment and since I know what I have posted I know that I have made no post after the creation of the RFC that in any way can be seen as a personal attack. Show me these personal attacks that have been made after the creation of the RFC and let others judge if they are personal attacks (Deng 06:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DMorpheus comment

message: One should take note that Kurt has refused to respond to the matter at hand and the only post he has done in no way answers why he has vandalized so many pages. Also he contiunes with his acts of vandalism and contiunes to edit wiki which proves that he has no wish what so ever to discuss anything (Deng 17:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  A fine example of a personal attack. You are atrributing motives to someone you don't know.  Discuss actions and edits, not people and their (unknown) motives, please. DMorpheus 23:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A fine example of a personal attack really? then what do you call this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGeorgy_Zhukov&diff=51718554&oldid=51712467 useing the term "This is laughable" isnt that a personal attack? (Deng 12:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is about Kurt, not either of you. --Woohookitty(meow) 06:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I made it about kurt did I not? And then I responed to the comment. Where does it say that I am not allowed to point that the person who has a RFC has refused to reply to the matter at hand, and where does it say that that it is not allowed to respond to responses made by others. (Deng 13:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kurts lack of response

message: "Also he contiunes with his acts of vandalism and contiunes to edit wiki which proves that he has no wish what so ever to discuss anything"
Same could be said about you. He has not answered any of my points, such as deleting the information on Tiger II article as vandalism and getting reverted soon by Denis. (Unsigned comment added by Kurt Leyman)
First post things where they belong second answer the first 56 diffrent points made on the article. The edits made to the tiger 2 were a mistake from my side now answer the 56 points made on the first page and reply in the section where you are ment to reply (Deng 22:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folks
Talk:Ruth Witt-Diamant

message: This article was speedily deleted as a non-notable biography.  I have undeleted it, as it clearly is not a non-notable biography.  If you want to delete it again, take it to AfD or something. Kelly Martin (talk) 03:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: My knowledge on these matters comes from the fact I am her grandson; Christopher Witt Diamant  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unicorn144 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haakon Chevelier;  
Talk:Hypoprothrombinemia

message: I've got this on my watch list and will clean it up and turn it into a proper stub, but I need my computer connection at work to access the right databases. Thatcher131 03:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I've
Talk:Diaphragm (optics)

message: This article, translated from the Dutch original, was very confused about what a diaphragm is.  The diaphragm is the thin opaque stop, not the hole in it.  Most of what was said about the diaphragm was more appropriate to the aperture.  So I tried to fix it.  Dicklyon 03:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Diaphragm versus Aperture

message: Given that the iris is the eye's diaphragm, and that the iris reduces the size of the pupil (the eye's aperture) in bright light, and does the reverse in dim light, would it be correct and useful to make the analogy that the iris helps control the brightness of exposure of the retina in the same way that a diaphragm does in a camera for the photographic film? Carcharoth 10:44, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not just an analogy; it's the truth.  Are you saying that needs to be made explicit some place? Dicklyon 22:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I think I've found a few places to put this, but maybe it should only go in one place? Carcharoth 14:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It always says in the second paragraph: "A natural optical system that has a diaphragm and an aperture is the human eye. The iris is the diaphragm, and the opening in the iris of the eye (the pupil) is the aperture." If you think it needs to say more about exposure control, one place should be plenty.  Dicklyon 23:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analogy with the eye
Talk:Tāne Mahuta

message: }}
I removed 'the tallest' [known living kauri].  Though often repeated, this isn't true.  For example 'Hokianga' in the Omahuta Forest, and Tairua 3 in the Coromandel are taller.
I have a number of resources to contribute here:
- A video of the forest, including specific coverage of Tane. 
- A geocache right there (w/ lots of useful information), as well as at two other nearby locations of relevance.
I therefore propose the following inclusions under external links:
* God of the Forest - A Faber Optimé geocache at Tāne Mahuta.
* Northland Secrets Early Rizers Mix - A short Faber Optimé YouTube film about Tāne Mahuta and the Northland region.
Under ==See also==
* Look Out Waipoua! - A nearby Faber Optimé geocache in the Waipoua Forest.
* Te Matua Ngahere - A nearby Faber Optimé geocache at Te Matua Ngahere.
Faber Optimé (talk) 08:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. As has been explained to you by several people at User talk:Faber Optimé, you should not be linking to your own work, and all those who have reviewed your videos to date appear to have agreed that they are not suitable as links. Geocaching links are also not suitable.-gadfium 20:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

message: I have added a note to highlight that all the measurements recorded were taken in 1971. Oldtreeman (talk) 22:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurements