lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Marytown, Wisconsin

message: You are invited to participate in Talk:War hawk#Requested move 21 May 2019 about whether War hawk should be moved to Hawk (foreign policy). R2 (bleep) 16:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Out of curiosity, what connection does this article have to the requested move you mentioned? -- Dolotta (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was in error. I was trying to catch pages associated with “War Hawks” or “Warhawks,” including a number of schools around the country that use that name for their mascot. R2 (bleep) 00:59, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[War hawk]]
Talk:Catalina (Tomcat)

message: Any reason for a separate article from Apache Tomcat? I suggest we merge it into there. — Matt Crypto 20:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Juno Award for Artist of the Year

message: I'm not sure if the Junos have a formal lineage that says that the best male/female awards officially converted into the "artist of the year" award, but it feels like the Juno Award for Entertainer of the Year (1987-1996) the nearest equivalent to the current Artist of the Year (2003-present).
From 1970-99, the award was for male/female vocalists, not even artists. The Entertainer of the Year was for the best overall artist (including groups) which is what the current Artist of the Year is for.
If nothing else, I submit that the lead of this article should reference the fact that from 1987-1996, there was another award for Entertaining of the Year. TheHYPO (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity 
Template talk:Translation/Summary

message: I think it it would be better if "Translation Status", "Comment", "Requested by", and "Interest of the translation" were not underlined. It is a web design guideline that only links be underlined. (See, for instance, Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox on May 10, 2004, "Guidelines for Visualizing Links", which states: "Don't underline any text that's not a link, even if your links aren't underlined." ) Unless there are any objection, I'll change this in a while. I'll also replace "Translation Status" with "Translation status" (emphasis mine) while I'm at it. — Itai (talk) 21:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

message: This template appears to be used on both talk and article spaces , is this a talk or a article template? Gnevin (talk) 16:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk template?
Talk:Battle of Mirali

message: I'm seeing that the casualties list 35 civilians.   I'm wondering how we distinguish between a civilian and a "militant."  This will become increasingly relevant, I believe, as so many conflicts now in the world do not involve nation state armies fighting against each other and instead involve an army versus some kind of violent ethnic, religious, or other identity movement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.40.10.246 (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civilians vs Militants 
Talk:Jack Wilson (jazz pianist)

message: Hello, this is Jazz pianist, Eric Reed. I must admit, in my haste to get the proper information out there because Jack Wilson had just died, I didn't read the rules as thoroughly as I thought I had. Sorry about that. If someone with better writing skills than I wishes to rewrite the bio and make it less "blog-like," (yes, I was somewhat non-neutral,) please please please do so. I just ask that you please don't delete the article entirely, as it does help to clear up some of the confusion with the British Jack Wilson, etc. Thank you, EricEricScottReed 21:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, Eric. Sorry for the misunderstanding - the deletion discussion has been withdrawn. It seems I too was a bit hasty and missed a few important facts. Since it does appear that some editors are willing to work with you to knock this into shape, I am more than willing to give you all a chance to do so. Good luck with it! Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Sonic Underground episodes

message: I have added this to my list of stuff need converted to lists i will probally get round to doing it within a few months if someone wants to do it before now leave mea message if you are not sure how to do it and i will give youa quick tutorial.--Andrewcrawford (talk) 22:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode listr 

message: I've never seen any evidence that Sonic Underground ever aired on Cartoon Network. It certainly never aired on Miguzi or Toonami. Maybe it aired on a foreign Cartoon Network, but this either needs to be clarified or the alternate airdates removed. 24.61.5.220 (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartoon Network? 

message: Going by the airdate is wrong, given that the episodes aired out of order. This is the real, intended order. - 186.109.206.202 (talk) 23:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The episodes are out of order
Talk:Business routes of Interstate 94 in Michigan

message: I'm pretty certain we could merge other articles for I-94's business routings outside of Michigan here because there'd only be a few more to add and it would be ridiculous to make similar articles for each state. Spicy 15:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course. That's what I was intending when I merged them, but I didn't know if any other articles existed, and, lazy me, didn't check... —Scott5114↗ 17:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-94's business routes outside of Michigan
Talk:Neil's Heavy Concept Album

message: Can anybody explain why so many of your articles about albums only list the contents of side 2? Are you afraid that telling us the names of all the tracks would somehow be a copyright infringement, or is it just that you simply can't be bothered? 86.141.29.204 (talk) 18:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Inquiry
Talk:Moortown, Leeds

message: I have managed to find out that this page was just copied from an estate agent's brochure
http://www.manningstainton.co.uk/cms_media/files/local_guide_moortown.doc.
I am therefore removing all the copied text and starting again.
Chemical Engineer 21:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Industrial coating

message: Opinions would be appreciated on whether this link: PVD coating theory would be an appropriate addition to the article.  Thanks.  -- SiobhanHansa 21:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No: Although the information appears solid, but (1) authorship is unknown (2) any references to reputable/verifiable sources of the provided information are absent. Therefore this website fails Wikipedia:verifiability criteria. `'Míkka 23:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link opinions
Talk:Hamilton-Madison House

message: I lived and grew up on the Lower East Side of Manhattan during the mid 1960's and attended many of the programs at Hamilton-Madison House.  I even worked for them in the later 60's. They had many wonderful and creative ways to keep the poorer teenagers and younger children off the streets and out of trouble.  I only wish I could find out where some of my couselors that were employed during that time are today so I can say Thank You! I will never forget Jean Jones; I loved her; Our group was called "The Heatwaves"! I remember!  Also Ann the Art teacher and so many others. Most were still in College then. If you know someone, remember someone, or are someone who was there during that time, please let me know.  Angelov128 21:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment 2007
Talk:Arc-PVD

message: Opinions would be appreciated on whether this link: Arc evaporation animation A simple animation showing the arc process would be an appropriate addition to the article.  Thanks.  -- SiobhanHansa 21:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No: Although the information appears solid, but (1) authorship is unknown (2) any references to reputable/verifiable sources of the provided information are absent. Therefore this website fails Wikipedia:verifiability criteria. `'Míkka 23:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link opinions 

message: The articles are about the same process and should be merged.  Iepeulas (talk) 13:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger done Iepeulas (talk) 01:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge to [[Cathodic arc deposition]]
Talk:Sputter deposition

message: Opinions would be appreciated on whether this link: Magnetron sputtering information An animation of the sputtering process would be an appropriate addition to the article.  Thanks.  -- SiobhanHansa 21:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No: Although the information appears solid, but (1) authorship is unknown (2) any references to reputable/verifiable sources of the provided information are absent. Therefore this website fails Wikipedia:verifiability criteria. `'Míkka 23:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link opinions 

message: never heard of it before.  used in sealing potato chip bags.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69Y0VuOYqkU&feature=related  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.154.17.255 (talk) 08:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term Evaporation boat 

message: The two article cover more or less the same subject matter.  They should be merged but it won't be easy due to the amount of overlap. Iepeulas (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger from [[Sputtering]] 

message: Isn't the image on the upper right is inverted up-side down?
The sputtering target should be suspended on the top.
And the substrate should be waiting down below.
What sputtering type does it fall to?
It should be specified too.
Probably, it's on the gas sputtering.
Regards,
LJ  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.71.116.54 (talk) 02:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The (two) sputtering chambers I've seen had the target at the bottom. I'm not sure that it actually matters though. ~Awilley (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sputtering Image Orientation 

message: Types of sputter deposition
Magnetron sputtering source
Sputtering sources often employ magnetrons that utilize strong electric and magnetic fields to confine charged plasma particles close to the surface of the sputter target. --- This links to the cavity magnetron which is a different device. 147.251.27.193 (talk) 07:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnetron sputtering x Cavity magnetron
Talk:Simon Hunt

message: Someone changed the redirect into a stub article about Simon Hunt, the Sporting and Technical Director at West Bromwich Albion, and previously of Southampton.
References:
* Hunt joins Baggies
* Hunt settles in
I have changed it back to a redirect as the Simon Hunt above does not appear notable. I could not find any third-party sources that mentioned him, only the above links to the club's website. --Jameboy 21:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hornsby–Akroyd oil engine

message: I think this may be another UK/US language difference.  In the UK, a vaporizing oil engine means a spark-ignition engine fitted with a vaporizer for running on Tractor vaporising oil.  The Akroyd Stuart engine is called a Hot bulb engine or semi-diesel.  What are the US definitions? Biscuittin 21:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I intend to move this article to Oil engine and change Vaporizing oil engine to a disambig page referring to both Oil engine and Tractor vaporising oil. Please discuss. Biscuittin 09:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No response for over a year so I have made changes. Biscuittin (talk) 07:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: This is  a hot bulb engine and not a diesel.
Furthermore it has little control over the start of combustion so it would only run smoothly at one speed with the same load.Wdl1961 (talk) 15:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hot bulb class 

message: It seems to me that it would make sense to merge this page with Hot bulb engine, and redirect Hornsby-Akroyd oil engine to an appropriate subsection of the resultant page. Any comments? Salmanazar (talk) 15:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Taenite

message: this should give more information that a 13 year old could use for reasearch. it is difficult to reasearch things when websites dont give enough information. you have to go to like 20 different sites till you find all the information you need
* As of right now, the German and Italian versions of this page are more complete, and their languages are close enough to English to get the basic facts from.  However, you should always be wary of using anything on wikipeida as more than background knowledge.  However, as you do research it would be great if you updated this page with your newfound knowledge.  What information is it exactly that you need?  130.39.188.130 (talk) 19:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

message: If it's only found in meteorites, it's not really "found naturally on Earth," is it? It has to come to Earth from outside Earth. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 00:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "naturally"
Talk:Narrative theory

message: This page should be renamed Fisher's Narrative Theory, as it is likely to be confused with Narrative Theory meaning Narratology. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  Hungrysolace  (talk • contribs)  09:40, June 18, 2008
:Agreed. I've put the appropriate templates on this article and on Narratology. --zenohockey (talk) 01:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Wolff Olins

message: weren't these the fools who did that ugly Olympic logo? surely that should be mentioned... as well as the fact it made me throw up.
Surely this is blatent advertising for a company??
Yes, it is and their own website directs you to it 87.194.152.110 (talk) 17:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[2012 Summer Olympics]] logo

message: Given that this page has only a 1.5 "completion" rating, how can we best include further information?
I propose creating a new section for "Recent Work" that uses factual info gathered only from verifiable news stories about their brand launches (i.e. FastCompany, Washington Post, AdWeek, Under Consideration -- not their "case studies" page which would be inherently biased).
Also, its great to include high profile criticisms of the company but for the sake of balanced reporting, it may be worth including some of the awards that they've won over the years (as gathered from verifiable sources).
Any thoughts? 
Sbl19 (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of this page 

message: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.
* Good start. I don't think Identity Works qualifies as a reliable source. User:King4057 (COI Disclosure on User Page) 21:49, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What specific change are you looking to be made? Specific wording would be really helpful. I've disabled the Requested edit template for now, but feel free to re-enable it with specific info. Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 07:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolff Olins reputation 

message: I don't know if anyone agrees with me, but this article reads like an advert, completely unbalanced. For example, there is the glossing over certain controversies around the London 2012 Olympics branding.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattdabest (talk • contribs) 13:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  An unbalanced advert?
Talk:Johann Muller (rugby union)

message: I can't see why this photo belongs to Johann Muller's article.
Maybe he was playing in the test when this scrum was photographed?, but one can't even see him in the picture!
(On the open side of the 'Bok scrum is Schalk Burger, the scrumhalf is Fourie du Preez and the rest are backline players)
I want to nominate it for deletion. Aliwal2012 (talk) 15:28, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, he's definitely not one of the clearly visible players in that photo. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 11:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

text: According to : http://www.genslin.us/bokke/SARugby.html Johann Muller didn't even play in this game, so I totally agree it should be deleted. JNicol (JNicol) 13:14, 02 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  By mutual agreement of above 3 users, I'm deleting the photo in question. Aliwal2012 (talk) 18:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo attached to Johann Muller's article
Talk:IEEE 802.11b-1999

message: The main article "IEEE 802.11b-1999" mentions ranges of several kilometers, with high gain antennas. This seems very strange, as the regular MAC protocol probably does not support it.
A reference to someone who actually managed to do this is essential here.
Anyone who did this probably used a very elusive mode, and also high transmit power and high gain antenna. The high transmit power would be in violation of FCC rules. Any local 802.11b devices may suffer from extreme interferece. Some devices might even be damaged. This high power transmission may even interfere outside of the WIFI band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.60.10 (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: What does it mean that it is a direct extension of DSSS? Why not say that it uses DSSS modulation? 
188.58.21.168 (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Direct extension of DSSS"
Talk:IEEE 802.11a-1999

message: More discussion of the channels would be useful. The article states 12/13 non-overlapping channels, but also states that the spread is 20 MHz. As the band is 5725 to 5850 MHz, this suggests only 5 non-overlapping bands. (Books I have read suggest 8.) I cannot get my head around all this so, presumably, others will also be having trouble. HairyWombat (talk) 21:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They really are non-overlapping since they start (in the U.S.) at 5180Mhz.  But more appropriate for List of WLAN channels.  -- KelleyCook (talk) 15:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Talk:IEEE 802.11a-1999 2401:1900:8033:98B3:471:B625:62D0:E47D (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . 2401:1900:8033:98B3:471:B625:62D0:E47D (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Channels 

message: Is it worth discussing the FCC rules in the article? They state that for point-to-point links, the transmitter power can remain at 1 Watt even when using a high-gain antenna. (This is not the case down in the 2.4 GHz band used by 802.11b/g.) HairyWombat (talk) 21:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be more than welcome, IMO.  Make sure that you reference WP:Reliable sources. -- KelleyCook (talk) 15:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FCC Part 15 

message: It'd probably be good to have more references for some of the information in this article, such as claims that the hardware for 5GHz radio devices is/was too expensive. Rohaq (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references needed? 

message: I noticed the [clarification needed] on the last column of the table, so here's a formula for calculating the time in microseconds to transmit n bytes of data at a rate of R megabits per second.
T = 20 + 4 * ceil((16+(n+28)*8+6) / (4 * R))
This includes preambles, signal fields, MAC headers and CRC.  I'll leave it to someone else to update the table – it appears to be slightly incorrect in these numbers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.111.100.152 (talk) 19:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computing time from packet size
Talk:The Rankin Family

message: There is no mention of Do You Hear What I Hear, the holiday release by the three sisters! 47.54.85.103 (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christmas long player
Talk:WWIL-FM

message: I would rather redirect WWIL to Siti Cable. Greatder (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is these WWIL articles really notable?
Talk:Dianna Ortiz

message: This article needs more sources, particularly RS that are not just another version of Sister Dianna's testimony. There need to be secondary assessments and analysis, such as news accounts by RS, particularly given her accusations of direct American personnel involvement in the events. State terrorism in Guatemala is well-documented, but, according to the article, she also has made specific allegations that do not appear to have been confirmed.Parkwells (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more sources

message: The John W. Sherman book is described as an introductory text on Latin American history; it is not a specialized book about Guatemala. The editor who used it did not have the correct title or provide a page cite, which does not contribute to confidence in its use for such an important cite - suggesting Cokie Roberts had a conflict of interest because of her brother's company having a lobbying contract with the Guatemalan government. Needs a citation page to be complete. Suggests someone was trying to do OR. Parkwells (talk) 17:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Similarly, there were outright errors in use of Ratner's clear article about "Justice & the Generals". The Guatemalan general was in the US at the Kennedy School in the 1980s, not 2000, and he gave the commencement address at SOA in 1991, not later. I've made corrections, and added more cites from what appear to be original sources, or at least RS that were contemporary with the events cited, rather than from books or other sources many years after the fact. Parkwells (talk) 23:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of Sources

message: — Assignment last updated by Sofiarociofis (talk) 16:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Women's Movements in Latin America
Talk:Tele

message: I've never heard the word/prefix "tele" used in the sense of "A range of different TV shows often fictional." I think this should be removed. Does anyone else agree with me? Strawberry4Ever (talk) 13:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A range of different TV shows often fictional." 

message: In the sentence "Or a broadcast of information by a group of people whom may or may not have permission for this", "who" is correct because it's the subject of the verb "have". Strawberry4Ever (talk) 13:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical error
Talk:Mett

message: Other articles on raw meat dishes discuss the safety issues. I think that is something missing from this article as the consumption of raw or undercooked pork is widely regarded as dangerous. One wants to know whether people frequently get sick from eating mett or whether there are precautions that prevent this.Bill (talk) 23:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is what the "Hackfleischverordnung" is for. People are not getting sick when the Mett is consumed within the first day of preparation. I think that is made clear. Isn't that common sense anyway? Yalca (talk) 07:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

text: I must disagree under the basis that there is no objective source of common sense; rather it exists solely on cultural levels. The relevance of this statement is thus: In many cultures, it is 'common sense' to cook the meat and leave the consumption of any raw meat strictly to the realm of things that are not 'common sense'. (Anonymous) 13:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Safety issues

message: it says it is popular in Poland as well as in Germany - What is the name in the Polish language for it ? 12:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish name 

message: As a Belgian, I want to point out that raw beef seasoned with onions is a very well known dish in Belgium. As there is (also) a belgian immigration to Wisconsin, maybe that's the origin of this "cannibal sandwich". 2A02:A03F:A8FC:7A00:447A:46C2:DF27:6D9E (talk) 07:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cannibal sandwich" = German or Belgian ?