lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of browser games

message: Is there a good reason why this list is separate from List of multiplayer browser games? I don't think any other game lists make this distinction. 2fort5r (talk) 08:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the long wait ;) I spun this list off/created it because the 'multiplayer' list is more of a 'massively multiplayer' one. I think the multiplayer one should be renamed massively multiplayer and this should be left for standard games. Someoneanother 12:22, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Single Player vs. Multiplayer

message: This is duped from Browser_games as it applies equally here.
I have an interest, over 10 years experience creating web games and resources for people with low literacy and or learning disabilities. Since not later than 1998 these have been designed to be accessible and conform to web standards and specifications. Flash, java and other plugins were not used. I understand this pages describes the fact of such games, but as faict fails to link to any external or internal resources or examples, whereas there are quite a number of Flash games included.
Recently Mozilla launched Game On, and had well over 100 entries, of which XGS hosted at http://www.peepo.com was one (mine). XGS can be played with a broad variety of input devices such as touchscreen, mouse, keyboard and hands free. Accessible Flash games are extremely rare, when found at all.
Why does the Browser game listing refer almost solely to Flash games?
Why is there no mention at all of accessibility?
Why were my edits removed?
Please dont just nod towards standards-built games, get out there, review and play a few, and include some relevant information.
Else this just appears to be a plug for Adobe Flash!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Signbrowser (talk • contribs) 19:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open Web Games 

message: The DMOZ link is not dead but the page states that the games are no longer available. They are not at the mirror site either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.63.232 (talk) 06:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  DMOZ link 

message: Why are Submachine 3 and 4 mentioned in the List, but not 1-3, 5-10 or the spinoffs of the Submachine (series)? – cave2596 talk 18:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submachine 

message: It would be better as one article with 2 sections: single- and multiplayer. -Pmffl (talk) 04:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that. Matingholami (talk) 17:07, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Good idea to merge that one too. (I didn't know it existed.) To be clear, I suggested single- and multi- as the categories because that's how the existing articles are divided. But a merged article could be organized another way if it would be better. -Pmffl (talk) 01:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of multiplayer browser games]] into [[List of browser games]]
Talk:Peramivir

message: 1. this page seems to erroneously describe mainly Ribavarin
: According to this medline article , Ribavarin is a different drug. Brian Pearson 04:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed these three sources from the article as they seem to add no info
: http://www.upmc-biosecurity.org/website/flu_update/content/cbn_flu/2005-10-03_cbn_revclinH5N1.html
: http://www.upmc-biosecurity.org/website/flu_update/content/cbn_flu/2005-10-12_cbn_peramivir.html
: http://www.idsociety.org/Content/ContentGroups/Committees1/Standards_and_Practice_Guidelines/Influenza_Panel/Mishin_VP_et_al_2005.pdf
--CrownofThorns 04:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: There is no reference that Hayden presented 'unpublished animal data' at IDSA in 2005.  He did give an overview of pandemic readiness.--CrownofThorns 04:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hayden
Wikipedia talk:Thread-mode disclaimer

message: You might look at User:Andrewa/thread mode warnings for some previous discussion of this disclaimer. Andrewa 03:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussion

message: The old history of the page mentioned in this edit summary can now be found at Wikipedia talk:Thread-mode Disclaimer/Old history. Graham87 00:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old history 

message: If this is to be considered a project-space essay, shouldn’t it be rewritten away from using the first person? It still reads like a userspace subpage. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 23:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably.  I've taken a stab at generalizing and updating it substantively, and removing truly personal quirk and anecdote stuff. I've tried to capture the typical attitude of habitual self-refactoring editors as of 2017, and add practical advice (templates, etc.).  May not be perfect, but surely an improvement.   If I were to take another pass at it, I would probably rewrite it to stop using first person, and to instead address "options" and "flexibility". Rather than "I" (i.e., editors like the few authors of this page) having the following exact expectations, put it in terms of "don't assume", and provide the range of typical "liberal" attitudes toward refactoring.  I don't want to go that route yet, without first seeing whether the updating and genericizing I've done so far is well-accepted, since a further overhaul would be a lot of work, and I don't want that time wasted if this page is treated proprietarily by someone who likes to revert.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  06:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Pinging all editors who transclude Template:Thread mode (formerly Template:Disclaimer). PS: I have updated that template to now support custom thread-mode disclaimers, so if you like most of this page but violently disagree with one point, you can simply fork the essay to your user space and have it say precisely what you want. :-)   Also thinking of doing a WP:Userbox version.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  07:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
File talk:Guanzi.jpg

message: This is a good photo but the contrast is such that it's difficult to see the finger holes.  Badagnani 17:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for letting me know. On the monitor where I edited the photo, the finger holes shows up OK though not that clearly, but looking at the the photo on another monitor I can see the the contrast is too high and you can hardly see the finger holes. I'll try to edit it again or take another one. LDHan 15:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contrast
Talk:Great Atlanta fire of 1917

message: I added a very small image, if anyone can find something better, GREAT! Staxringold 21:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image request

message: what is the source for this information?  It reads like Garret's book and so should be referenced.  Also, I believe that the "small warehouse" was actually the "Pest House" for Georgia Baptist Hospital -- where many of the Spanish Flu victims were housed.  The mattresses had to be burned because it was unknown if they would spread the disease. (This was told to me by my g'father who was purchasing agent for the hospital at the time.) Reverend Mommy 13:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?
Category talk:Muppet Show characters

message: This category name seems inaccurate.
Specifically, Bean Bunny, Waldo C. Graphic, Rizzo the Rat, and Pepe the Prawn never appeared on The Muppet Show.  However, based on the text at :Category:Muppet characters, they are still categorized correctly, since all four (plus others, like Clifford) have been "inducted" into to the main group of Muppets.
Still, if this is going to be a category for "main-group" Muppets (as opposed to Sesame Street Muppets, Fraggle Rock Muppets, and non-Muppet Henson creatures), shouldn't the name of the category reflect that?
Powers 17:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

message: do we really need this as a sub-cat to ":category:Muppet characters"? Can't all these just be in :category:Muppet characters? And the Sesame-specific characters would be separated by their own sub-cat. But being that a lot of these aren't from the muppet show (some appeared before it, and some after it). i think this is unneeded and misleading. 
:Statler&Waldorf 17:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: needed
Talk:Llamatron

message: The article mentions among the enemies Eyes of Horus. Aren't they actually Eyes of Providence? Alf Boggis (talk) 17:59, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be correct, I've changed the mention in the article accordingly -- Zagrebo 08:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I had the ST version and have never heard of the "Rude Llamatron" version. The normal version has censored profanity when you died. Does this rude variant definitly exist? --Big in albania 11:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rude Llamatron
Talk:Salute Your Shorts

message: The words to the theme song aren't what appeared on the show... according to the file at  the words are:
"We run, we jump we swim and play 
We row and go on trips 
But the things that last forever 
Are our dear friendships" 
That is a striking contrast to the un-airable lyrics in the article currently.
... Umm, I think it's 'dear friendships' ... hehe, different ships.
:'dear friendships' def makes more sense, but I always thought it was 'differentships' as well Pnkrockr 18:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the second line is "We row and no one tips", and "dear friendships" is right.Dshibshm (talk) 01:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Exactly.  And it was as clear as a bell to me. 72.154.166.199 (talk) 00:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:   I don't see why this is so hard. "No one tips" makes no sense. "Go on trips" fits with the previous "We row and". "Different ships" also makes absolutely no sense.
---How does "we row and no one tips" not make sense to you. They are rowing a boat and nobody tips. Makes sense to me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.96.168.3 (talk) 23:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme Song 

message: Maybe mention how Danny Cooksey carried the show with his incredible acting. The rest of the cast members were inexperienced/poor actors and a lot of the show was corny, but he just carried the entire show. He was so "into" his character and his character created all of the tension and catalytic reactions that made it work. There is no chance this show would have a cult following without him.
 
that would be rather POV, would'nt it?70.35.90.142 21:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danny Cooksey 

message: I can't personally confirm that Kate Hudson was a part of the cast but if she was, it certainly wasn't a role big enough to be considered part of the main cast. BT14 01:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kate Hudson

message: Are Paramount Pictures and Nickelodeon Movies planning to make a feature film version of Salute Your Shorts? Please let me know. AdamDeanHall (talk) 18:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Pvegeta (talk) 16:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are Paramount Pictures and Nickelodeon Movies planning to make a feature film version of "Salute Your Shorts"? 

message: What the blazing hell happened to the episode list?  The season 1 titles were changed to use the incorrect iTunes release names, and the season 2 list is all messed up.  I'm fixing.  Travelsonic (talk) 15:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode List
Talk:JT-60

message: seems the record for ion temperature has been broken...  
the z machine has reached 2 GK, apparantly; beating 520 MK. could someone verify this? cheers - mastodon 18:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The result is real, as far as experts can tell. However, you should give mention to the fact that 520 MK is still the best value for a system with long magnetic confinement times.Danielfong 06:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Record temperature

message: China's new EAST fusion reactor uses Tritium so I included it in the list of Deuterium-Tritium using reactors.  205.188.116.13 17:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the new EAST fusion reactor from the list of Deuterium-Tritium using reactors based upon a NewScientist interview (http://www.newscientistspace.com/article.ns?id=mg19225723.100) with Jiangang Li, director of the Institute of Plasma Physics in Hefei, Anhui province that refuted the official Chinese government reports that Tritium was used (as well as several additional statements).  205.188.116.13 17:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: EAST

message: From about 1996 it seems to be called JT-60U (is that Upgrade?) on the website. - Rod57 (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: They say JT-60 Upgrade replaced and reused parts of the JT-60 - so perhaps we could list the parts and parameters that changed. - Rod57 (talk) 12:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

text: maybe a small table comparing size, cost, plasma volume, max field in plasma, and at the magnets, with ITER. - Rod57 (talk) 13:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  JT-60U, what changed

message: Superconducting, Advanced. We should give more details on this too. Article currently uses the 2007 plans. Needs update. and were the delays due to ITER being delayed ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: maybe a small table comparing size, cost, plasma volume, max field in plasma, and at the magnets, with ITER. - Rod57 (talk) 13:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: JT-60SA
Talk:Tagetes

message: I've removed the mention of a Tagetes species native to Africa as I have been unable to verify this. "African marigolds" are derived from T. erecta, a Mexican species. At least one species (T. minuta, syn. T. glandulifera) grows "wild" in Africa but appears to be an introduced weed. MrDarwin 18:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Tagetes minuta is not cultivated in South-Africa at all.  The species entered the country during the Anglo-Boer War (1896-1902) with the importation of fodder for british horses.  Although widely naturalized it is a declared weed (katogory 1) according to the South African department of water and forestry.Autumnleaves51 (talk) 09:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagetes minuta in South-Africa
Category talk:People by religion

message: Thelema is not a religion, it is a magical philosophy. Anyone who wishes to embrace an established religion is free to choose one, but Thelema is not one of those.
Nuttyskin 00:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thelemites

message: I will remove people from this category (and its sub-categories) for whom their faith is not a defining characteristic. Probably people from earlier centuries are more likely to stay in based on this extra condition.
See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_23#People_by_former_religion
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andries (talk • contribs) 13:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Defining characteristic
Talk:SEQ

message: My edit comment referred to WP:DP, but WP:D is what I meant. -Harmil 18:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:DP

message: Havn't figured out how to put comments on the rollback yet, but this change came from the someone at the school itself according to the IP address and was autobiographical.  It seemed out of place as a disambiguation. Ajh16 (talk) 14:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of School Club
Talk:Antonio de Erauso

message: Hey. This article about a Transman consistently misgenders him and uses his deadname. Stop it. 162.208.41.70 (talk) 00:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender Pronouns

message: The basque version of the name: Katalina Erauso, is a full inventión. The use of K to replace the C is the late twentieth century and is set for political reasons, not orthographic: to get away from the Spanish phonetic rules. Catalina de Erauso always wrote his name with C, never with K. In addition, the use of "de" was mandatory to indicate the origin of the person or his lineage. The spanish version is: Catalina de Erauso, and the basque version is the same.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.61.197.190 (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right that this Basque name is full invention: human language is full human invention, and the same can be said about any name. All the names in all languages are full human invention, including Catalina de Erauso as well. Anyway, if you Google, you will see that there are several things named Katalina Erauso: a piece of theatre (Katalina Erauso pastorala), an school (Katalina Erauso eskola, in the native city of Erauso)... So the Basque version of the name is nowadays often used to honour her in several contexts, and it will be helpful for the reader to know that they refer to this historic person. --Xabier Armendaritz(talk) 12:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: fake basque name

message: Shouldn't it be Alonso de Erauso?
Aquataris (talk) 14:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be Antonio de Erauso, as that was the name he chose to go by for the remainder of his life. Arsaic (talk) 06:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Duly moved. RexSueciae (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Phoebe Hessel

message: Might be asinine, but I'm American... why would she get half a guinea per week rather than a guinea per two weeks or a pound in pence every week? Many thanks, Potatoswatter 19:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a link to the history of the guinea in the article, where it indicates that there was a half-guinea coin.  I do not know about the US but over here people were and continue to be paid either weekly or monthly.  Esthameian 23:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

text: But this was before compulsory registration of births.Esthameian 23:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  half guinea 

message: I've often heard it said that a folk song, perfomed by the Grateful Dead,was about Phoebe Hessel. Jack-a-Roe is very similar to her story and I'll include a link here to the lyrics:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcreedy (talk • contribs) 08:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack-a-Roe 
Talk:Joanna of Flanders

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Awfully stubby, but not quite worth reducing the rating from Start. Even if it was a mysteriously-coded bot doing the rating...
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara ✉ 02:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Is she being confused with Jehanne de Montfort, (1294-1363), daughter of Arthur de Montfort, duc de Bretagne and Yolande de Dreux, who married Robert, sire de Cassel? I note  Alison Weir, Britain's Royal Family: A Complete Genealogy (London: The Bodley Head, 1999:201). A lot of Jeannes at this time.--Wetman (talk) 04:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Jehanne de Montfort"

message: — Assignment last updated by Friedaj (talk) 17:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Middle Ages
Talk:Dmitri Shepilov

message: It'd be mighty nice to have English translation of the titles (usually, these are given inparenthesis after the original ones.)Circeus 18:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not as simple as it sounds, actually. The titles of the two books in question refer to the dismissive sobriquet -- "i primknuvshij k nim Shepilov" -- that Khruschev's propaganda machine used ad nauseum in 1957 and then again in 1961-1962. There was a number of proposed translations at the time and we'll need to review the evidence to determine the most popular version. Ahasuerus 22:12, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Jack Bee Garland

message: The article says she fought for 12 months and implies she did not start the war in the Philippines.  Yet the war lasted a bit under 4 months.  Clearly this article is in error. MichaelSH 02:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty serious error 

message: This same text (except the last sentence) is at http://bryant2.bryant.edu/~ker1/span_beam.htm Dpv 02:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:United States slot machine ownership regulations by state

message: What is meant by "private ownership?" Can't I have a slot machine in my bedroom for my own personal entertainment?
____________________________
That is precisely what these laws are ment to prohibit/regulate, as the law does not want you to compete, even in your own home, with the profitable modern computer slots operated by private firms that pay heavy taxes for the privilege of operating them.  Bigturtle 16:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's explained in the column. In some states the machine has to be 20 years or older. At any rate, it's indicated in the column what it means, and I don't know how you can be less ambiguous than "20 years or older".Rray 14:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: the BMI site listed here is pretty much for sales of arcade equipment, but the link on this page is actually kinda informative (although obviously not an official source of legal information)  Should it stay or go? SpikeJones 00:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not spam as the article needs a reference like this (it could be seen as redundant to the first, but it is a neat table like the one here so easier to see without digging through the text of the laws).  The problem is the first two links really should be called references, the third an external link, and the fourth either removed or also made a reference since it is redundant to the first two.  I'll break the section into the standard structure now. 2005 01:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam link?
Talk:Business judgment rule

message: How about a rewriting of this entire page so that it doesn't focus exclusively on the business judgment rule in US law which only one system of law in the English-speaking world.--118.210.94.139 (talk) 09:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William Brown (sailor)

message: The fact that Brown was cross-dressing makes her of interest for the LGBT project. Transgenderism and transvistism are issues of identity, not of sexuality. (this is clearly explained in the Transgender article. Please do not remove the tag. --Zefrog 11:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But it isn't clear if Brown really did identify as a man. Most female wartime crossdressers wore men's clothes purely to have a military career, and some later fought openly as women. Most lived as women before the war, and most resumed living as women after the war. The interpretation that Brown would self-identify as transgender is purely subjective and isn't based on any historical information. Asarelah 18:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

text: She would not have been able to identify as transgender or anything else of the sort because the concept did not exist at the time. However the fact that she lived as a man (even if she did not identify as such), that she subverted the rules of gender representation, that she was effectively trans-gender, relates to the Trans experience and as such is relevant to the LGBT project. --Zefrog 21:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, I will put the entire female wartime crossdressers category into the transgender and transsexual people category. Asarelah 03:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great idea! --Zefrog 22:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT category