Talk:Muggletonianism

message: My grandmother (died in the 1990s) was a Muggletonian as was my Aunt (died 2000). Several other Muggletonians came to my grandmother's funeral but none, as far as I know, to my aunt's. My aunt had an original edition of the Third Testament that the duo (or one of them) wrote. There was also an interesting 'catch 22' that made it almost certain that the religion would die out, as it seems to have. I'll try to get more detailed information and report back Terryw (talk) 13:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Last of the Muggletonians?

message: According to Paul Brassly, a scholar at the University of Exeter, the Muggletonians never went extinct:
"More Last Muggletonians
Patrick Collinson wonders whether Philip Noakes was the last Muggletonian (LRB, 5 June). Wade Muggleton, whom I taught about twenty years ago when he was in his early twenties, claimed membership of the sect, along with (as far as I remember) other members of his family. He was surprised I had heard of them, and seemed unaware of Christopher Hill’s and E.P. Thompson’s work.
Paul Brassley
Ilsington, Devon" - https://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n13/letters [3 July 2008]
In fact, Wade Muggleton (probably a descendant of the group's founder) is well and alive:
https://www.permaculture.co.uk/articles/what-crops-grow-what-cull  [22nd September 2016]
84.175.139.240 (talk) 20:59, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Never became extinct

message: I read some where that many Muggs were killed in the bombing of Liverpool during WWII. Can any one confirm this? Lentisco 04:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it. A Zeppelin bombed the building where the Muggletonians used to meet during WWI. Reeve, co-founder of the Muggletonians, was buried in Bethlehem Churchyard, which was in the vicinity of the present Liverpool Station (London). So perhaps you got something mixed up. ---84.175.139.240 (talk) 21:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: bombing of Liverpool

message: What is the difference between the two? BillMasen 01:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Muggletonianism]] vs. [[Fifth Monarchists]]]? 

message: This page has got itself nominated for the 2009 April Fools Day featured article. (Nuffink t'do with me, cats and kittens, honest.) It wont "win" which is a shame as it would be an excellent opportunity to try out Muggleton's curse on a few folks. peace n loveCoxparra (talk) 17:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  April Fools' Day 2009 

message: I removed some apparent original research from the "The Two Witnesses" section.  It seems that someone was synthesizing sources to present their own opinion on the movement.  There were also issues with tone, e.g. "What does Revelation say the Two Witnesses are to do?" and "Was the root of the problem that Reeve and Muggleton hadn't taken their role seriously enough themselves?").  It cited Clarkson's prior occupation, then used that to draw its own conclusion about why Clarkson ended up submitting to Muggleton.  However, I don't have these souces, so it may be that some of the statements were supportable, just not well-cited. Superm401 - Talk 02:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent original research in The Two Witnesses 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Muggletonianism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121008184516/http://gagebooks.com:80/ to http://www.gagebooks.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Does anyone know if ref/footnote 11 is a verbatim lifting from one of the other references? It seems to me to be rather opinionated and looking at the facsimile of the 1829 hymbook mentioned, likely incorrect.  link to book on archive.org
In particular this phrase seems to be unsupported: "The words when read from the page are doggrel but, when sung to the correct tune, come over very well indeed. They are not hymns of praise because God takes no notice." - lots of the songs in the book are praise songs. The 125 song has the first lines: "When I praise the God of Jacob, In my soul what joys do flow, for to see by his last prophets, we this almighty God do know"
Which makes one wonder whether some of the other stuff in this page (and elsewhere) about the nature of Muggletonian worship is completely wrong. JMWt (talk) 12:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  footnote 11