Talk:Amiga games

message: 16-bit? Amiga was 32-bit from the start.
M68000 was 32-bit architecture.
Addresses was 32 bit.
Data was 32 bits.
Memory word was 32 bits.
AmigaOS was 32 bit.
The address bus was 24-bit and the data bus was 16-bit, but this doesnt make it a 16-bit computer, architecture was 32-bit. Actually the firsts 386/486 didnt come with a 32 bit address/data bus, nor the firsts 286's(16-bit processors) came with 16-bits bus.
It was recalled to be a 32-bit computer, and i coded it enough so i can confirm it.
Motorola 68000
Custom chips had differents specifications, but they was mapped to different places of the memory. All the coding thing was doing in a 32-bit memory space handling and performing operations and transfering 32-bit data. Even when a 32-bit word had to be moved in to different steps(16-bit data bus).   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgarcia109 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Amiga was(is) a 32-bit computer

message: By what merit is a game judged to be important? Is it sales, the first of its kind, awesome sound/graphics, etc. This article would do well to include a two/three line burp on just why <insert game> was included. This is especially true for Historically significant games.--Anss123 20:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Important?

message: As no more external links can be added directly to the page I would like to request the addition of a new external link to the site classicamiga.com.
* classicamiga.com Database of Amiga games - information, screenshots, videos, manuals, reviews, comments and more.  
Classicamiga 16:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Nice website you got there, but we already link Lemon Amiga (which is similar in scope) and I think that's enough.--Anss123 21:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding an external link

message: Hi,
<http://netzreport.googlepages.com/downloading_amiga_games_legally.html> is about where classic Amiga games can be downloaded legally and free of charge. Should we add this link?
--Jutuub (talk) 15:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should - it's a useful and up-to-date enumeration of legal download links. -- Amigos santos (talk) 10:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding another external link

message: :Image:Amiga Defender of the Crown land.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Amiga Defender of the Crown land.png

message: :Image:Amiga Shadow of the Beast.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Amiga Shadow of the Beast.png

message: I must say that, for an article with a class of High importance, it is disappointing to see that ZERO effort has ever been made to add citations of pretty much any kind - and in fact, in the past, one attempt to get a citation was denied with the comment of "no citation needed, this is a given fact." There really is no such thing as 'a given fact' here on Wiki.
This entire article is full of seemingly-inflated, unsourced, and unsubstantiated statements, and it fails to meet Wiki guidelines in just about every single regard.
I hate to do it, but since most of the unsourced material has been sitting there for 6 full years, I'm really going to have to make severe cuts. What needs to be done is to add material back with good, reliable, 3rd party sources - like every other Wiki article. This article is not exempt from this criteria. TheWizardOfAhz (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappointed in this page