Talk:Bram Cohen

message: Is it just me or is this article very poorly written? It doesn't have that encyclopedic feel to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.74.196.118 (talk) 15:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Parts do seem oddly specific without actually adding any biographical value: eg. "Cohen's hobbies include original origami and juggling up to five balls…" What does it matter exactly how many balls he's capable of juggling? Lesmothian (talk) 00:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedic Writing?

message: The Bram Cohen Asperger claim cites two three sources: the Wired article (which doesn't go into any detail), the Fortune article, and the interview on Wrong Planet. However, the sources don't say anything about it being a self diagnosis. Are there any reliable sources for this, or is he formally diagnosed, or is this just another spurious claim that yet another random genius, celebrity or luminary has it? In any case if this can't be clarified then the paragraph needs to be struck (or at least reworded) due to BLP concerns. Snthdiueoa (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self diagnosis? Reliable sources? 

message: The community that BT was built around was the free high quality bootleg community for such bands as Phish. Bram wanted to trade large FLAC files around without a lot of bandwidth. This was the primary purpose and goal of BT. --Gayhippo 19:51, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's completely false —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.44.203.105 (talk) 05:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally Innaccurate 

message: On Bram's own site , he claims to be a pirate. Why, then, does anyone think BitTorrent was intended for any legitimate use? -- Mikeblas 02:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It says at the top of that page that the text is a parody on the cypherpunk manifesto. Don't take the content as a serious statement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.130.4.46 (talk) 07:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pirate 

message: Please do not remove the interview with the subject until we come to a consensus here.
Perl (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A local consensus will not override the broad consensus that editors should follow our conflict of interest and external links guidance, nor that we should be very conservative in applying verifiability policy where biographies of living people are concerned. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 00:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The verifiability policy is perfectly acceptable, as is the COI policy, but the site in question has been shown to be a reputable source by multiple other established news organizations. Perl (talk) 00:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The site in question is already linked in the references section. There is no need to have it a second time in the external links section, especially since there are also COI issues here. (I understand from Talk:Wrong Planet that User:Perl is actually the founder of the website concerned.) —Snthdiueoa (talk|contribs) 00:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, didn't see that. Strike my original comment. Perl (talk) 13:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cohen and asperger's 

message: I know the problem with blogs as sources, but if a link is to an interview - and the blog has no additional analysis - is it still verboten?  Thanks, WalterGR (talk | contributions) 01:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally no, per external link guidelines. However, TorrentFreak may be recognized as an authority on these matters - perhaps not. If it can be argued that TorrentFreak has a particular sort of authority or relevance, then the link should be included, but otherwise it probably shouldn't be. --Cheeser1 (talk) 01:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is probably not exactly WP:AGF of me to say so, but I can't help wondering if there was a hint of WP:POINT in removal of that particular link. OTOH, I can't say I disagree with it. I tend to favour a minimalist approach to external links myself, not least because (a) "external links" sections tend to be spam magnets and it can be difficult to know exactly when to draw the line, and (b) the legitimate ones are usually better off as references for specific statements in the text. Maybe it could be cited as a source for something in the article? —Snthdiueoa (talk|contribs) 02:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's true.  No sense in listing in the external links every interview he's ever done...  I don't care if the link stays or goes - was just curious what the policy was.  Thanks, WalterGR (talk | contributions) 02:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The general policy seems to be to list those types of links in the reference section. Perl (talk) 12:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of TorrentFreak interview 

message: "First a bit of history-and-culture stuff. I was working on Mojo
Nation, in its secret pre-launch mode in early 2000, with Jim McCoy,
Doug Barnes, Greg Smith, and Bram Cohen..." "Mojo
Nation lineage went through a series of restarts and a changing lineup
of performers. Err, I mean of programmers. During this time, Bram
Cohen left Mojo Nation and invented BitTorrent. The goals of
BitTorrent can be seen as a subset of the goals of Mojo Nation. I
learned from the success of BitTorrent that it can help to limit the
scope of features you are trying to combine into one software project.
"
https://archive.is/SqYkz#selection-71.2178-71.2248 (https://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2011-July/006560.html)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.71.62.41 (talk) 15:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article also needs information about his new cryptocurrency! 
Sjb0926 (talk) 19:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: can you please see if you can find some WP:RS for this new currency? We need mainstream sources, cryptosites and WP:PRIMARY sources wont do. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Tom's Hardware did an article on Chia, and a Google search of "Chia" has about 10 hits, all with exactly the same headline, which is why I came here looking for more information.  Discovered someone hasn't done an Article dedicated just to Chia, and I think someone should, if someone has the time and interest.  My interest in Chia is focused primarily on whether or not it's a legitimate "currency".  They keep using the word "currency", but IMO it's not money until you can buy something with it.  That was my main question re: Chia, so if someone does an Article, and that information is available, that would be a good thing to include.68.206.248.178 (talk) 12:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

text: The section on Chia implies that space-time consensus would be less susceptible to threats of centralization from state actors and such, is there reason to believe or at least some outside claim of why that would be? Blackmoldbasement (talk) 21:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New cryptocurrency Chia 

message: Can we update his personal life section, he is no longer married to Jenna he filed for divorce in 2017.  https://unicourt.com/case/ca-sfc-bram-cohen-vs-jenna-leigh-cohen-474244 75.11.10.129 (talk) 06:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any more updated divorce docs to show it was finalized? I did update the tense on the article from lives to lived (past tense). Somewhat improved, but still could be better. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 07:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life- add divorce?