lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Qutuz

message: He was a just Turkic origin. Being born in Iran, doesn't make he Iranian.
At that time, there were too many Turks in Iran, and the ruling dynasty of Iran was also Turkic. He has nothing to do with being Iranian. 
Moreover, he ruled not even Iran but the mamluks(Bahri Dynasty). 
He didn't rule Iran or wasnt Iranian. Please, don't change this. He is just turkic. He is only Turkic in every source. Taerelo (talk) 10:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was a Just Turkic origin 

message: brother of Qutuz's mother 84.215.179.160 (talk) 00:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jalal eldin was uncle
Talk:Al-Qubayba, Hebron

message: Dauphin-mistake:  p. 880 she gives Guérin, Judée II, 299-303: Khirbet Oumm El-Lakis  for this place.  But that  Khirbet Oumm El-Lakis   nowhere near Al-Qubayba.  However, Guerin identified (wrongly) Khirbet Oumm El-Lakis with Lachish (which is near this place), therefor the mixup. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 14:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo/mixup 

message: I restored the sentence containing the eponym of the village, the original source I cited was from an interview of one of the inhabitants; however, to make it more robust I just added another source from the book "Palestinian Costume" also detailing the same eponym specifically in pages 159,184,187,260,267 and the index page 287 also contains the name of the village along with page number of the references. Thanks Thinktank9238327 (talk)  23:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: hi. I guess you didn't notice that I had already placed that bit of information in a paragraph of its own, "Name". Also, at Wiki headings don't use capital letters. I've taken care of those two reverts, I hope it's OK with you, done it in 2 steps, at the 2nd I've put of course your new source back in. It's all in the edit summaries also. Have a great day, Arminden (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry! thanks for taking the time to respond, Good edits, thanks :) Thinktank9238327 (talk)  18:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eponym of village
Talk:El Qurn

message: This is a great point - many of the places in database for Ancient Egypt don't have their proper Arabic names, just their transliterations. Markh 09:20, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
:: Arabic script added,  template removed from talk page.  skoosh (háblame) 22:07, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Corrected sexist comment in the article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greedo3000 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor alteration

message: Is it really necessary to insist on the lower-casing of the definite article so emphatically?  There are a lot of other Arabic names in Wikipedia which just go for capitalized "Al-". AnonMoos 03:09, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles with unsupported titles

message: The third and fourth paragraphs contain information that is contradictory. The bulk of the paragraphs is given to information about how to climb the peak. But tucked into the last of the third paragraph is this: "The climbing of the mountain is no longer allowed by the government of Egypt and is heavy patrolled by guards, cameras, and motion sensors." Notably, no sources are provided for any of the article, so it's impossible to know whose authority is being invoked here, much less how accurate it is. Unless someone wants to advocate for a different approach, I am going to combine the two paragraphs, and then add the odd sentence at the end, couching it as unreliable. Bricology (talk) 02:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction about access to peak
Talk:Al-Rifa'i Mosque

message: This article claims The mosque served only 'briefly' as Rezā Shāh's resting place, but the article on Rezā Shāh states his body was buried there after being disinterred after the Iranian Revolution, Which is it?
77.100.157.213 (talk) 22:30, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rezā Shāh 
Talk:Aybak

message: Please read the reference before attempting to change the text.
--Chapultepec 18:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Aybak

message: According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, the name of the sultan is Aybak , and the article Aibik does not give any extra information. So, we can redirect article Aibik to this article. --Chapultepec (talk) 19:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Al-Maqah

message: I removed the Arabic template since it was not in the Arabic script. The definite article "al-" does not exist in South Arabian articles, so I am copying and pasting this to Almaqah. The inscriptions had on them 'LMQH, not al-MQH. I know it will destroy the history, but a move is not possible, and the article is already short. The current article will be made a redirect, although I'm not sure how useful it will be. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 03:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Qalawun

message: The photograph illustrating the article on Sultan Kalawun is not of the mosque of this sultan (more precisely, of a madrasa within his complex at Bayn al-Qasrayn in Cairo). The caption says "Qalawun Mosque" for unknown reason, even though it correctly states that the mosque of al-Nasir Muhammad Ibn Qalawun (at the Citadel) is shown. This mosque is not known as "Qalawun's". The complex of Qalawun is a very important piece of architecture historically and artistically, and very beautiful (Caroline Williams, Islamic Monuments in Cairo, AUC Press 2002, p. 165-8). It has very little in common with the mosque of al-Nasir Muhammad shown on the picture. A photograph of Qalawun's complex should be included. Jaroslaw Cairo (talk) 14:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: الملك المنصور should translate as "the championed king" since the word Mansour refers to someone being championed to victory by someone.
"The Victorious King" would be "الملك المنتصر".
similarly, "الملك الناصر" would be "the championing king", one who champions his people/nation/soldiers/faith to victory
Also "الملك الظافر" would be "the winning king" because الظفر refers not only to victory, but a gainful victory, usually winning something as a result of victory (a castle, a country, a horse, a treasure, etc). 2607:FEA8:4B80:9703:2CD7:23B7:8CBF:5A72 (talk) 08:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of the name/title.
Talk:F (programming language)

message: : Compilers are freely available for the Windows, x86 Linux, and Solaris platforms.
But they aren't freely available. See the license. "You may adapt and modify any shell scripts, but may not reverse engineer any object or executable files." Free? I don't think so—Trevor Caira 20:49, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They are free as in beer. DanBishop (talk) 04:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Heather Armstrong

message: the picture used of her is not from 2015 it looks old plus its got 0004 written below,it could possibly mean 2004..correct me please and if its 2004 then .please help this article..make it 2004..thank you. 15:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: wrong date of picture

message: Instagram is not a reliable source to change article to say Armstrong is dead. The single news story so far[] only reports what is being said online and says . Wait for a reliable source to published a confirmed story. Schazjmd (talk) 16:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Daily Mail has now picked up the story, however it is not a reliable source either (and story seems to be based solely on the instagram post). Schazjmd (talk) 16:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Associated Press story with confirmation from her partner. 73.63.155.159 (talk) 17:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

text: FYI, it wasn't just "Instagram" I referred to, but it was dooce's actual account, where her boyfriend posted the note about her passing. Glad it's now been confirmed to one editor's satisfaction. Daveicd (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible death 

message: Add death date - May 9, 2023. Further to: https://www.instagram.com/p/CsERc9lR_XC/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ== Anniethelin (talk) 17:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: see post above. Instagram is not a reliable source for that claim. Schazjmd (talk) 17:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 May 2023 

message: Add date of death: 2023-05-10 with link to Associated Press confirmation: https://apnews.com/article/dooce-heather-armstrong-dead-83c8f4812bda1766301793ea3afb02cb 73.63.155.159 (talk) 17:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: oops, 2023-05-09 73.63.155.159 (talk) 18:00, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Schazjmd (talk) 18:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 May 2023 (2)
Talk:Al-Mansur

message: Although "Shu'ubiya" is an Arabic word related to " peoples", I find it strange that it means " Persian art and culture is superior to that of the Arabs." 
Please persian guys, stop this racism and nonsense. 
(Ralmoud 21:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shu'ubiya?! 

message: Some of the text is copied verbatim from the current Britannica article. --Ghirla-трёп- 10:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: According to the Article House of Wisdom, it was founded by Al-Ma'mun. I have read the same elsewhere. What is correct? --AHert (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder of House of Wisdom?

message: Isn't this the same person and shouldn't the article therefore be merged? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Mansur_Ibn_Abi_Aamir  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.74.21.139 (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there are seven namesakes Al-Mansur (disambiguation). They lived in different epochs, so their articles shall not be merged. Rgds / Mkch (talk) 08:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Mansur_Ibn_Abi_Aamir 

message: Abu Muslim khurasani 37.111.128.90 (talk) 03:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tarikh e islam
Talk:Mohammad Shah Qajar

message: Please read over Arabic transliteration, it applies equally to Persian. This has nothing to do with the Arabic/Persian difference in language. There is a standard for transliteration that only uses 6 vowels: three long, three short. They go a, ā, i, ī, u, and ū. Cuñado  - Talk 18:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: title

message: Hi . I think the 2012 A.K.S. Lambton source has been given a wrong URL link (it links to an article about a Mughal ruler). - LouisAragon (talk) 21:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing it out, fixed it now. Amir Ghandi (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link?
Talk:Muhammed Bello

message: *Support. Evidently he is the same person as Sultan Muhammadu Bello. Dr.K. (talk) 01:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 

message: Three components of noun phrase  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.114.39 (talk) 06:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English language
Talk:Machapuchare

message: The English translation has this as "The Fish's Tail" (e.g., Noyce's book). The page needs a profile photo (many exist such profile photos exist in books like Annapurna: South Face) with the view which looks like a fish's tail. 143.232.210.38 (talk) 18:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A better photo is needed 

message: i suppose we can rely on the spelling in ne:wikipedia which is "माछापुच्छ्रे" and transliterates as "maachhaapuchchhre". this reflects the only pronounciation i ever encountered while living in pokhara for 2 1/2 years, without an "a" before the short "re" at the end. it is only in books that i read of the pronounciation "are". the spelling would then have to be quite different in nepali. perhaps a native speaker could comment on that.Sundar1 (talk) 09:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling and Pronounciation

message: This comment was left by someone in the article itself: Stevage 01:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:Michael and the Messengers

message: Most of the information for this attempt was from Rev. Norb's review which is only available in the Google cache. --Timtak 21:00, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

message: The band is notable, since they charted in the US ("That's the Way a Woman Is" in 1971). This goes unverified at this time, however. (Does someone have access to the US chart listings of 1971?) --B. Wolterding 09:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that I should have called the page "The Messengers" since they are the main band, who had the hit, and "Michael and the Messengers" were just a motown touring band created, as the article says, to cash in on Messengers fame. I do not know how to change the name of the article. The reference for the page is given in the references, which is an internet page based on a book about the group.--Timtak (talk) 06:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: both "The Messengers" and"Messengers" are already taken.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timtak (talk • contribs) 08:39, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability established but Page named wrong

message: It seems that George Michael and others released an album entitiled "Freek!" under the name "Michael & the Messengers" in 2002. Would this warrant a disambigation page?
--B. Wolterding 09:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation?
Talk:Wilbert Harrison

message: According to the 8th Edition of the Billboard Book of Top 40 Hits, it was "Let's Work Together (Part 1)" that was the #32 hit for Wilbert Harrison in January 1970 on the Sue label. A footnote below that listing mentions (first recorded by Harrison as "Let's Stick Together" in 1962.), but "Let's Stick Together" is not listed as a Top 40 hit.
GaryZ45RPM (talk) 12:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction: Let's Work Together (Part 1)
Talk:Translations of the Koran

message: This page has been merged. Please delete it promptly. freestylefrappe 21:14, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
*I disagree with deletion. "Koran" is still a common (mis)spelling of "Qur'an" and thus I have converted this to a redirect. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:46, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Tekken characters

message: All the Tekken character profiles should really be taken out of the Deletion section.
It can be argued that if these are taken out, then why not take a masterpiece like Link's profile out as well? Why not the whole Resident Evil cast, or all of Soul Calibur too?
The answer is it shouldn't, its all very valid information and I think it'd be far too harsh to have all of this hardwork removed. Namco characters have lengthy backstories so this can't be included on the main Tekken page, just leave it be.--Kiyosuki 21:27, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Add Lars Alexandersson to the Tekken characters category FireDragonValo (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lars Alexandersson
Talk:Onmyō Taisenki

message: I've noticed alot of stuff regarding english versions of the anime and manga... And I would like to know any source that has been used to provide said info.76.110.149.106 16:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is none (at least from Bandai Entertainment), that user has been going around and posting incorrect information and aquisition licenses. Deleted and warned.Lord Richard 03:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "From Bandai Entertainment"? Does that mean there's a company that DOES hold dubbing rights? Because I've been DYING for a dub. (not really dying, but ya get wat I mean.) 76.110.149.106 21:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

text: NOTICE: this is my new account created now. anyway... I have dreamed hoped for, and rallied fans behind, a dub of Onmyou Taisenki (to the point where Vic Mignogna knows about it and wants to be in it). I'm... actually shocked that no one... not even Bandai Entertainment... will take it. Masaru Kasuaki 04:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Onmyou Taisenki English version 

message: Can we get the episode titles in rōmaji too, please?
TwilightL (talk) 23:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode titles in rōmaji?
Talk:East Dundee, Illinois

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/403.html and http://www.eastdundee.net/?page=history. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 04:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Who Killed the Zutons?

message: Whilst the title of this article has been given a very specific number of dots (6), which is correct, it has a question mark at the end that surely shouldn't be there. Yes, I know that who.. is in the form of a question, but the question mark simply isn't in the title of the album, so the article shouldn't have one either should it? nagualdesign (talk) 05:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable question mark 
Template talk:Luxembourgish Grand Ducal Family

message: Once Louis marries, will they be included as members of the family, and should they be put on the template? Or should Louis be removed since he is giving up his place in succession? Or does that not remove him from the family? Just curious. Morhange 03:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tessy + Gabriel 

message: The wife of Prince Jean is neither a HRH nor is she is Princess. The Luxembourgish Court has confirmed that she remains "Diane de Guerre" without any titles. 217.93.197.196 (talk) 07:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diane de Guerre 

message: A request for comments which may impact this template has been started at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies#RfC on style in royal family templates. You are welcome to comment there. Fram (talk) 14:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC notification
Talk:Louisa Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire

message: This article needs the attention of an expert in this aspect of British history. Quoting from material at the Chatsworth website is not scholarly sourcing for a British historical subject. The 12 May 2017 IP edit, adding a prurient scene, while sourced, adds nothing to the "Career" section. And thereafter, line after line of material, purported to be factual, appears without sourcing in defiance of WP:REF (which allows for occasional, but not thorough-going exceptions). As it stands, the article is not encyclopedic (and not useful for as a student reading).  67.184.62.39 (talk) 22:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the prurient scene, which  seems irrelevant, and supplied some references for other content from the apparently well-researched book by Vane. The article now seems to me to be in better shape, and I have removed the tag suggesting that it contains material which is "off topic". I agree that the Chatsworth website is hardly an impartial scholarly source, but it is likely to have been well-researched. I have therefore added more scholarly references, but left in the references to the Chatsworth website, as they are likely to be more generally accessible.Ntmr (talk) 13:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is becoming an accrued mass of poor quality edits
Talk:Christian Brothers University

message: Can the unregistered editor who keeps trying to erase information about the fact that some of the university's education programs are on probation please explain their edits? Deleting this information without any discussion or even the courtesy of an edit summary appears to be whitewashing and that's not acceptable. ElKevbo (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education programs on probation
Talk:Presiding Patriarch

message: COGDEN, you wrote: "Among the duties of the Presiding Patriarch are to preside in council meetings" - can you please clarify this - it sounds like the presiding patriach presides over all/any council meetings in the church, including the council of the Twelve, stake high councils, 1st presidency and presiding bishopric council on disposition, etc. This needs to be clarified and referenced. Hope things are going well. -Visorstuff 21:53, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Presiding
Talk:Function-level programming

message: What would be an example of a function-level definition which is not the lifted image of a value-level one?
: I am not sure there is a reasonable answer to that question. It is more of a notational and usage question. Composition can only be defined (other than as a primitive) as (f . g)(x) = f(g(x)). The notations are equivalent semantically, but computationally and for optimisation and implementation they may be different - function-level programming will clearly have composition as a primitive. Justinc 23:16, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, program A and program B are significantly different when they reflect a different architecture.  This tends to be relevant only for complex programs with significant structure, which have been derived independently in different contexts.  This is where you would tend to see function-level programs which are not simple translations of value-level programs.  Of course, once a design is implemented it will be possible to apply that design in other contexts -- the real issue here is the original time and effort needed to find and implement the design.  That said, it's difficult to separate architectural influences from the language and architectural influences specific to function-level programming.  This is especially true given that there are so few function-level programming languages. With those qualifiers, the J program to compute arithmetic mean (+/%#) illustrates in a small way how a function-level definition can be different from a typical value-level definition.  Here, the absence of explicit variables quickly leads to a definition which works on arbitrarily sized and dimensioned data, with the language, rather than the programmer, defining the function domain.  RaulMiller 06:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

text: After re-reading the entries on the FP programming language and strict functions I think he must have meant bottom-preserving semantics. RaulMiller 06:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I also believe that "bottom-preserving semantics" is what was meant. John Nowak (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

text: There's no reason to mention this. The language is function-level "in the end". Talking about the resulting binary isn't relevant. John Nowak (talk) 02:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Yet another is the existence of function level definitions that are not the lifted (that is, lifted from a lower value-level to a higher function-level) image of any existing value-level one: these (often terse) function-level definitions represent a more powerful style of programming not available at the value-level and, arguably, are often easier to understand and reason about."
Right after the closing parenthesis. -- Dougher (talk) 06:30, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misworded sentence