lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bucking

message: * "It developed in the wild for the purpose of protection from feline predators such as mountain lions, who would attack horses by dropping onto their backs from above". 
Horses come from the "Old World". Puma concolor is an American species. So the evolution of horses had nothing to do with mountain lions aka cougars, right? 62.216.112.195 (talk) 22:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The lead was reworded and new information was added, along with citations. 
The first paragraph about reasons for bucking was reworded and new, relevant information along with citations were added. 
New information and rewording was induced in the Solutions paragraph. Citations were also added to this paragraph. 
The last paragraph on consequences was removed due to a lack of support from other sources. It was also slightly opinion based and I was not able to find literature to support it. 
Rewording, new up to date information, along with citations were the 3 main things I added to the article. 
Acp741 (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your efforts.  I had to do  some reworking; the course material added was quite helpful, and thank you. That said, it’s better to just add citations rather than risk copyvio problems by close paraphrasing of sources.  Also, the article uses US English, there were some grammatical fixes needed, and remember to put periods BEFORE citations, not after.  The unsourced content can be cited later and has been restored. There’s a lot of oral knowledge in the horse world, a written source will eventually be found if this article were to be polished for GA.  Montanabw(talk) 22:32, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements to the article
Talk:Beyond 3G

message: Their isn't a 3.5G article, it used to redirect to HSDPA.  It now redirects here.  Mathiastck (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we get a description of 3.5G here? 

message: The Beyond 3G article was deleted in 18 April 2008 by user:TravisTX due to Expired PROD. Concern was: "Speculation / advert / redundant information".
Shame on you guys for such a speedy deletion, without informing the WP:TEL project, which the article belonged to, causing the rest of us a lot of job. 31 articles were today referencing to the "Beyond 3G" article. 
Since Beyond 3G is synonym to, or almost synonym to, 4G, I have now recreated the article and forwarded it to 4G. Is this okay? 
Please continue the discussion at Talk:4G/Archives/2012/January#What to do about the removed "Beyond 3G", "3.5G" and "5G" articles?. Mange01 (talk) 11:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do about the removed "Beyond 3G", "3.5G" and "5G" articles?
Talk:Meritas (law)

message: ;Tag history
* 24 January 2008: User:Pairadox  a  tag to this article.
* 15 February 2009: User:Addbot  an  tag to this article.
* 12 November 2009: User:Colonel Warden , with an edit summary of "Remove tags"—although he did not add any incoming wikilinks, nor did he add any proof of notability.
* 14 November 2009: I  along with  and . I also  on his talk page asking him to not remove tags unless he either fixed the problems or got consensus here that they should go.
* 15 November 2009: User:Colonel Warden again , this time with an edit summary of "re Commercial Law Affiliates &c."
;I've now re-added the four tags, with these rationales
* : To date, no WP:RS have been found with in-depth coverage of Meritas. Mentions in local business newsletters and brief coverage as one of several examples in an umbrella article don't count towards notability.
* : According on WP:Orphan#Criteria, this article currently has one incoming link—which  on 15 November. Per those criteria, this article still qualifies as an orphan.
* : User:Pairadox initially added a  to User:Linzc 02's talk page () back in January 2008. I agree with that tag, and suspect that both User:Linzc 02 (the article creator) and User:Krystlemeath have some personal interest in this organization.
* : Just like the  tag, there's no solid sourcing here. Improved references could take care of both these tags.
;In summary
* Please don't remove these tags without either fixing the described issues, or without a consensus here to remove them. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 06:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article tags—November 2009 
Talk:David Williams (mathematician)

message: I've wikilinked to his entry (currently a redirect to Electoral Calculus. It appears that it's the same person, although we really need some reliable sources confirming if this is the case.  -- Trevj (talk) 12:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I've just seen that those joint publications are listed, so it must be fine. -- Trevj (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martin Baxter
Talk:Speech codes theory

message: This discussion page was deleted, but not the main article. I don't know why, but I recreated it now. The deletion log follows:
* 23 November 2007 at 02.08 MZMcBride deleted "Talk:Speech Code Theory" ‎ (csd g7). 
Mange01 (talk) 16:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion page deletion 

message: The title of this article was Speech code theory but the bold introductory said it was Speech codes theory. There was no article (or even a redirect) from speech codes theory. I moved the article to speech codes theory to match what's in the WP:LEDE. Someone with more expertise can address this if this isn't ideal. —mako๛ 23:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name 

message: There is now an article on Gerry Philipsen who seems to be primarily notable under under WP:ACADEMIC for his role in creating speech codes theory. There's a subsection on the Philipsen article that, I think, should probably be merged into this article? Maybe if somebody wants to spend a little bit of time improving this article they can address that article and make that bit smaller in the process. I'm not an expert in this area so I'd prefer to let somebody who knows this a little better to handle it. —mako๛ 23:27, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit [[Gerry Philipsen]]
Talk:List of characters in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1987 TV series)

message: There's already a List of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles characters. Please find any in this page that are missing there and add them, then redirect this page to the complete list. -- Ritchy (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They shouldn't merge, the List of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles characters is too long to be adding more characters. This article should be retitled List of characters in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1987 TV series). - Mediadimension (talk) 05:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Should not be merged. The main list is too long and the 1987 characters deserve a separate list as the original designs. OutOfTimer (talk) 01:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Process management (computing)

message: Sure; here are some things I noticed:
* The article should be at Process management (computing). Generally we capitalize only the first word, unless there are proper names involved. The same is true for ==Section headings==. You can move the article yourself by using the move button.
* There's no need to link the same article several times; for example you link process many times, but since the whole article is about processes, it's a little distracting. Just link it the first time you mention it.
* It would be better if citations were inlined throughout the text, using the ref tag; see .
* The sources themselves ought to be formatted using the  template.
* If you add diagrams, please use SVG so that they can be nicely scaled, edited, and printed.
* The style guide also has lots of tips on conforming to Wikipedia style.
* The article needs categories; you can look at related articles like kernel (computer science) and process (computing) to find some; they're usually at the very bottom of the wiki source.
* Be careful about using non-objective language; to open with "the fundamental task of any modern operating system is process management" is straying into POV territory. Couldn't one have a different opinion as to what the fundamental task of an OS is? A better opening establishes context ("In computer science... "), uses the title of the article right away, and explains what it is ("state the obvious") in a brief way.
* I think the trickiest thing about this article will be making sure it fits cleanly with the other work we already have on this topic. There's already some overlap with process (computing), for example. At a minimum, those other articles should link to this one (perhaps using ; at best, we make sure that a reader gets a coherent story across all of the related articles without too much repetition or differing terminology.
:: Happy editing! — brighterorange (talk) 16:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested review 

message: This article needs a sentence that describes process management. It could be something like: "In computing, process management is the management of processes." Somerandomuser (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs main description 

message: - process control blocks and how they are used in process management
- threads and their relation to process management
- schedulers
- queues in process management and how this causes bufferingPunker1999(talk)</span> 16:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Things to consider adding details on for better understanding
Talk:International Soil Reference and Information Centre

message: The article has been 'd, alerting that  I have made a cursory review of the article content and history and see a basis for concern. With no edit summary offered in support of the COI tag, I would like to wait a day to allow discussion before responding with article edits. -- Paleorthid (talk) 18:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest
Template talk:Governors of Wisconsin

message: Is it possible to show both the Governors and the Lieutenant Governors sections at once when including this template in an article? It would be useful to show both rows in articles about individuals who have served in both roles, Qqqqqq (talk) 05:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Showing 

message: See the centralized discussion here. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline style statements 

message: I added John Catlin and Orland Loomis to the template.
1-John Catlin continued to be acting governor of Wisconsin Territory that portion of the territory not admitted to the union when Wisconsin was admitted. Catlin continued to be acting governor of Wisconsin Territory until Minnesota Territory was formed. He called a special election for the Congressional Delegate from Wisconsin Territory and Henry Hastings Sibley was elected and took office.
2-Orland Steen Loomis was elected Governor of Wisconsin in 1942 but died before he took office. I came across a template about the Erie Canal Commissioners, a constitutional New York state office in the 19th century. One of the commissioners died before he took office and was listed in the template with a note he died before he took office. I looked at the Erie Canal Commissioners template and felt the change could be done. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions-
File talk:Panther0658.jpg

message: This image was taken from www.pghbridges.com and is the property of Bruce S. Cridlebaugh. Unless express written permission has been acquired from Mr. Cridlebaugh, this image should be removed from Wikipedia. Bruce has not been dead for over 70 years, as far as I know he is alive and well. If permission has been granted by Mr. Cridlebaugh, the liscence should be relisted as something other than a work that is the property of someone dead for over 70 years.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcnate (talk • contribs) 22:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright incorrectly listed.
Talk:Arjeplog Municipality

message: Does anyone know how Arjeplog is pronounced ?
:In reply to the above - pronunciation... http://www.forvo.com/word/arjeplog/  86.173.51.173 (talk) 02:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Kawajiri Hidetaka

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Willie Mack (musician)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 11:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pageviews here 162 etc. (talk) 01:14, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 June 2021
Talk:Cherry Street Tavern

message: The article links to John Flannery (American football). But that's the wrong John Flannery; it's about a guy who was born in 1969. By that time, Tex was a veteran coach at LaSalle, and Billy was playing for him!
There's some great info about Tex Flannery (that is, the right John Flannery) at http://homepage.eircom.net/~oflannery/bio/bioJFTF19222007.htm . Some of it might warrant inclusion if an authoritative source for it could be found. Or perhaps even an article about him. For now, though, I'm going to un-link his name. Better no link than a wrong one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TypoBoy (talk • contribs) 15:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tex Flannery
Talk:London Underground infrastructure

message: I think there should be a mention somewhere that a certain points, some lines on the London Underground run on the right hand side instead of the usual left hand side. For example, the central line between Shepherd's Bush and East Acton and the Northern Line between Moorgate and Elephant & Castle. Simply south (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left and right hand running 
Talk:Trichlormethiazide

message: I'm demoting this article to a stub. There is no information about side effects, contraindications, or interactions, and no reliable sources. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:Arkansas State Red Wolves

message: I split the football section to Arkansas State Red Wolves football since it was of some substance and had been split tagged for several months. Strikehold (talk) 08:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split football section 

message: The articles Red (mascot) and ASU Indian Family are stubs, and are likely to remain so, and could be merged into the Nickname section here. That section could also be moved towards the end of the article, its current placement being prominent.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 02:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done for the ASU Indian Family. Klbrain (talk) 20:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

text: Done for the Red too. Klbrain (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge articles on prior mascots
Talk:Southern Ontario Gothic

message: Is this not just Canadian Gothic?  The prairie novels fit the same criteria.  Settlers of the Marsh, As for me and my house.
Lehasa (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Gothic?? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Every username already exists (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LIT 3319 Contexts
File talk:Scorched1.0B.jpg

message: What the hell is the big problem? I don't even understand what's being disputed. I took the screenshot therefore it should be fair use right? Where is the big damage being done by this? I don't understand what a "non-free use rationale" is. I wish wikipedia would explain things in a language everyone could understand. Do NOT delete this image. SmartSped (talk) 17:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Districts of Botswana

message: Ok, did or did not the Chobe district merge into the northeast district? The maps and the text are very, very contradictory. Steinbach (talk) 10:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-tal-ly confusing 

message: The list is in the wrong order. 178.190.114.8 (talk) 12:35, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong order 
Talk:Central District (Botswana)

message: The 30.000 something must be wrong. Ghanzi and even Kweneng have more and central district is bigger.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.150.173.197 (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area? 
Talk:Gaza Ghetto

message: Thanks to the editor who started this page. It seems that we need to locate more in the way of reliable secondary sources who discuss this term's use so as to better establish its notability. Your help is appreciated. Tiamuttalk 17:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding this article using reliable secondary sources

message: This is introduced as a film, and then has, or rather hand, examples of how the term is used unrelated to the film. If you want to write an article about the term, or how much (or little) Gaza is like a ghetto, write an article about that, and don't try to hide it in an article about a film that was made more than 20 years ago. --Leifern (talk) 20:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neologism or film
Talk:Miodrag Božović

message: He is affectionately known as Grof so I added that to this title. The Big Hoof! (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Grof
Talk:Flypaper (1998 film)

message: This is one of the weirdest yet funniest movies I have ever seen.Dumaka (talk) 17:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Rotten Tomatoes says this is a 1997 film, and IMDb says this is a 1999 film.  Which is correct?  GoingBatty (talk) 14:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging from IMDB production details page, both are correct.  Filmed in 1997, released in 1999.  I couldn't find this in a more reliable source, though.  What should be done in this case? Aithus (talk) 08:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  WP:PFILM says to use "the year of its first verifiable release", so I'll move this article to Flypaper (1999 film).  Thanks!  GoingBatty (talk) 14:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  In that case, it's 1998; the film debuted at the American Film Market (AFM) from February to March 1998 . Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 03:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: Then please update the article with this information.  Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 03:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of release?
Talk:Sutton Scarsdale Hall

message: Bosh! This article has gone up a bit since it was featured on The One Show tonight! Booglamay (talk) 22:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How can Godfrey Bagnall Clarke have bought the Hall in 1740, if he was born in 1742? 82.36.235.34 (talk) 15:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pray explain
Talk:Domenico Grasso

message: :Please see note on your talk page. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 17:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if this page isn't speedily deleted, it may very well fail an Articles for Deletion discussion under WP:BIO or WP:PROF.  And that said, your edits to this article violate WP:COI as well.DJBullfish (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As the originating editor, the responsibility for verifying this information and inserting appropriate citations to reliable sources is yours. PS: if you sign your posts with ~~~~ your signature will appear - like this: Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 18:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree with others that this article seems to exhibit conflict of interest, i.e. I strongly suspect it was written by the subject himself, or by someone he knows personally. That's not to say it deserves deletion... There are a lot of very unknown people (usually in the more "exotic" side of the film industry) who have been given their own Wikipedia articles. So it's not such a bad idea to have an article on a distinguished scientist who none of us have heard of. The problem is WHO wrote the article. Wikipedia can't be used as an extension of someone's resume. 64.26.155.230 (talk) 22:04, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest
Talk:List of birds of Botswana

message: I was looking at this page as my only Botswana Bird Feild-Guide so I thought it could be formatted like this:
Common name        	Family       	Scientific name         	Notes	Image	Distribution
Ostrich            	Struthionidae	"Struthio camelus"      	     	     	
Little Grebe       	Podicipedidae	"Tachybaptus ruficollis"	     	     	
Great Crested Grebe	Podicipedidae	"Podiceps cristatus"    	     	     	
Ect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.181.120 (talk) 05:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Format?
File talk:Fullwave.rectifier.en.png

message: There is no voltage scale to the rectified output, but nevertheless for teaching purposes, it would be nice if it were changed to half present-size, so it could be directly compared with the output of the bridge circuit, which is twice as large for the same secondary coil. Comparing the two would then immediately convey this difference, due to the center tap. Could you perhaps change it? SBHarris 18:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A useful change to this image
Talk:Formal (university)

message: I was surprised to find the article leave certain universities unmentioned. So to this end, I have merely pointed out Universities of Melbourne, Sydney, and Toronto in the introductory section of the article as other institutions in which the formal dinner is practiced. 
The constituent colleges thereof, to which this applies, include but are not limited to: Trinity College (Toronto), Janet Clarke Hall and Trinity College (Melbourne), and St. Paul's College (Sydney). 
By referring to each constituent college's website, one can easily attest to this, but in case I double-checked the aforementioned colleges. Here's, for instance, what it states on St. Paul's website: "Dress for Dinner in Hall from Monday to Friday is jacket, tie and academic gown. Dinner in Hall is the high-point of the College day, and is an occasion with a high standard of 'formal-informality'.  It includes distinctive College ceremonies and the most important community announcements."
-- And Rew 04:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about other Commonwealth Colleges? 

message: This section doesn't mention what it actually is!
Rpjs (talk) 23:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pennying

message: The University of Bristol is mentioned twice; in the first paragraph as having formal halls; and in the second as having something similar.86.132.221.141 (talk) 15:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Bristol 