lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Storkyrkan

message: I'm not terribly satisfied about the pictures I took. The copyrighted picture that used to be at :sv:Storkyrkan is a lot better since it seems to have been taken from a boat (or the opposite shore even). I think we should include one of the bell tower, since it's hard to discern from that low angle. Anyone who can get both the back facade and the bell tower in the same pic should try for it.
Peter Isotalo 22:49, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is mentioned: "...it has also been the cathedral of Stockholm since the Diocese of Stockholm was broken out from the Archdiocese of Uppsala in 1942." Uppland 10:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, it's formally a cathedral. However, it's almost never referred to as such (using the Swedish words for cathedral, "domkyrka" or "katedral"). This is probably because it's a recent thing, and the fact that the church didn't have cathedral status (as in seat of a diocese) when it was built. --BluePlatypus 05:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It is claimed to be an example of brick Gothic, but the exterior is clearly not Medieval. Why is there no mention of the change, which must have taken place at some point? The interior seems Gothic, but the exterior clearly seems modified into some kind of Baroque or some such.109.59.57.252 (talk) 01:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exterior - changed?
Talk:Eric John Stark

message: My Copies are in storage, but I remember the hero of "Lorelei" being named "Conan" and not Eric John Stark.  "Queen of the Martian Catacombs" appears to be the first Stark story.  It was published three years after "Lorelei of the Red Mists".
I have not yet got a copy of this story, but this appears to be correct.  I'll remove the reference to "Lorelei". RandomCritic 18:17, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The Other section says, "A final story Stark and the Star Kings (2005) places Stark into the world of her husband Edmond Hamilton's Star Kings series, making it a rare collaboration between the two."
Since Brackett died 1978 and Hamilton the year before, the story clearly is not from 2005; that is the publication year for the collection of the same name. And that collection seems a little confused as to when the story was actually written and/or published. My copy (the Baen 2008 ebook) gives it a 1949 copyright (with no details on where it appeared, unlike for the other stories), while the authors' introduction seem to date it to mid 1972: "Twenty-six-and-a-half years ago, when we got married" they thought collaboration would be easy. They tried it once, it turned out not to work at all, and "So here is our first, one and only, true, authentic collaboration." ISFDB calls it "a cross-over collaboration, published here for the first time, originally sold to The Last Dangerous Visions."
Thus, the date is wrong and the collaboration is unique, rather than "rare." hth Idontcareanymore (talk) 22:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stark and the Star Kings
Talk:Io (programming language)

message: The article says that in Io "everything is an object" and then "everything is a message". Could it be these are two different everythings? In the given example System version "System" is probably an object, not a message; and "System version" is a message whose return value/reply is another object? Or is "System" also a message, to the universe? --2.247.241.196 (talk) 17:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be better to say that every "thing" is an object, and every action is performed via message passing. For example, while Java has objects and messages, things like numbers aren't objects in Java (they are in Io) and actions like addition are not messages (but they are in Io). --Steve Dekorte  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevedekorte (talk • contribs) 01:21, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Everything is what? 
Talk:Remote-control vehicle

message: This page seems somewhat redundant with Remotely operated vehicle.  Perhaps it should be a redirect? siafu 23:07, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This page

message: This should either be remotely controlled vehicle or remote-control vehicle.  The current title sounds like a description of vehicles meant to carry remote controls.  —Michael Z. 2006-08-11 06:15 Z
:I made Remote-control vehicle a Redirect to Remote control vehicle.  Both Remotely controlled vehicle and Remote-control vehicle are now Redirects to Remote control vehicle.  H Padleckas (talk) 12:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatically-correct title 

message: Although these are commonly known as remote control vehicles, people involved with the hobby refer to them as 'radio' control vehicles. Perhaps someone should change the title. Spec ops commando 09:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The days, the description "radio-controlled" vehicles or "radio-controlled" this-and-that is becoming somewhat of a misnomer, since infrared radiation is becoming increasingly used instead of radio waves to remote control certain devices such as model aircraft like toy helicopters.  Perhaps RC should refer to "remote control" instead of "radio control" in many cases in the real world.  H Padleckas (talk) 12:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct title 

message: *Check for dated info
*Update and expand
*Reassess once work completed
Chaosdruid (talk) 09:04, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robotics attention needed 

message: i think this redirection must be canceled , as it has no relation to the article , it maybe one of the applications but it's not helpful for users  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mido omikron (talk • contribs) 20:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  why bomb disposal robot redirects to Remote control vehicle?
Talk:Kenny Garrett

message: Why put the Keith Jarrett specification?  I don't think any person searching for the saxophonist Kenny Garrett would really be searching for the pianist Keith Jarrett...
The link "Bio at The Duke Jazz Archive" doesn't work anymore. Replace? Fix? Delete? -- 80.144.110.103 12:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These sources do not ever belong in External links. I have moved the link farm from there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning: I didn't check them over, so be careful in choosing any references here. Thank you! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources don't belong in External links; they belong here
Talk:Dame Allan's School

message: As suggested in your edit summary, I looked at the defintion of public schools.
From Public school:
:"In the England, Wales and Northern Ireland the term "public school" refers to fee-charging independent secondary schools."
and
:"The term "public school" is generally used now in the United Kingdom to refer to any school that is a member of the Headmasters Conference..."
and from Independent school (UK):
:"An independent school in the United Kingdom is a school that relies for all or most of its funding on non-governmental sources."
and
:"The term public school has traditionally been used in England and Wales because these schools, although often originally founded on charitable lines, developed into institutions open to any in return for the payment of fees."
Dame Allan's is a fee charging independent secondary school which is a member of the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference originally founded on charitable lines, which has developed into an institution open to any in return for the payment of fees. It may describe itself as an independent school, but it meets any definition of a public school I can find, and I fail to see the two terms are mutually exclusive. Anilocra 11:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you are right. According to the def on Wikipedia DAS is a public school. That surprised me. Sorry for reverting me, but I can't help but think that Wikipedia has got it wrong. --SandyDancer 11:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Independent school (UK)|Independent School]] or [[Public School]] 
Talk:Bionanotechnology

message: Can someone tell me why there's an article named Nanobiotechnology in addition to this one? Seems rather redundant. Joffeloff 17:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that bionanotechnology = adapting the mechanisms found in molecular biology for nanomachines that can do many kinds of work, while nanobiotechnology = designing nanomachines to do work within biological organisms. Presumably there's overlap between these fields, but order does seem to matter. :-) FreplySpang (talk) 17:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've been asked to provide a source for the above. I don't really remember, but I think this was just the impression I got from reading our two articles at the time. They may have changed since then. Cheers, FreplySpang 01:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bionanonanobio

message: I think that this article should be merged with the article Nanobiotechnology. Although the terms do have slightly connotations and usages, the distinctions are by no means commonly recognized. Also, there is so much overlap that most relevant technologies are better discussed in a holistic context rather than trying to split them up. It would be much more effective if the distinctions between the terms were discussed on one page, allowing for a better elucidation of the differences. Vramasub (talk) 03:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Abdul Ghani Khan

message: This looks a really interesting subject - that I don't know anything about - but I've tried to wikify a bit. It's my first time wikifying - hope it's alright. Only content I changed was about the book The Pathans - i googled a bit and it seems the date is 1947, not 1958, and the fact it was written in English ought to be mentioned. But somebody who knows the subject ought to look at it. 
Also, I don't know how to change the page's name - 'khan' needs to be capitalised. Safie 23:40, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for wikifying, you made this one look better. I've also moved the page to a new one with the proper title. Solver 23:41, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Abdul Ghani Khan per reasonable nom, unopposed.  No such user (talk) 11:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Khan Abdul Ghani Khan →  –    The initial "Khan" in the current title to this article appears to be a title and not part of Abdul Ghani Khan's given names. See, e.g., ‘Death is not the end of life’: Abdul Ghani Khan: The poet, philosopher and politician and Famous poet: Abdul Ghani Khan. His father, Abdul Ghaffar Khan, also had the honorific "Khan" occasionally prefacing his name. As a title, the guidelines (WP:TITLESINTITLES) would suggest moving this article to "Abdul Ghani Khan", although during his life he was commonly known as Ghani Khan (currently a redirect). See, e.g., Celebrating a Pashtun legend. Bejnar (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 August 2021
Talk:Constitutional Reform Act 2005

message: * When will this change take effect, and what will be the trigger?
* What effect will it have on the powers and jurisdiction of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council?  Does that article need to be updated?
* How are judges appointed?
* How may judges be removed?
* Supreme Court of the United Kingdom should probably be updated with this information, as well.
-- Beland 23:50, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion request

message: Can anyone answer the High Court article question posted at this link? Thank you in advance. Bo99 (talk) 23:06, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Court article question 

message: The link to the primary source is broken, it can now be found at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/4/contents
I am not sufficiently familiar with wikipedia's markup to make the change myself.
83.100.188.53 (talk) 10:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link for primary source
Talk:Union of the Democratic Centre (Spain)

message: I replaced the existing article (though I forgot to log in). The new article is mostly a translation of the more complete Spanish wikipedia article, but I incorporated a couple elements from the previous English one. Ak13 23:50, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Following the attempted coup of 1981, the socialists convincingly won the general election.
Following?. The attemped coup was on february 1981, the general election was in November 1982, 20 months after the coup. 
Please rewrite that. Randroide 12:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: There's some nice images here of 1979 electoral propaganda.--Estrellador* 22:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Miles Smith (bishop)

message: I protest that this is NOT a candidate for speedy deletion.  It meets the criteria given in the instructions page.  There is no plausible claim to notability and the formula is patent nonsense.  How is this NOT a CSD? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apollo58 (talk • contribs) 13 August 2005
Miles Smith is notable for his work on the King James Bible; he was one of the final editors, wrote a lengthy preface for it, and some of the apparatus, and brought it to press. He was also a bishop, which alone entitles him to a page in Wikipedia, as someone somewhere sometime may need some reliable information and context.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.156.92.150 (talk) 15:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Basque diaspora

message: Is there any particular reason this is a separate article from Basque people rather than part of that article? Just asking. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:03, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
Really,...not. There is no special reason to write a separate article and is partially -political- biased when says "The Basques do not have an independent country to call their own, being divided between the Spanish and French states." In the spanish side, the land of the basques is called "Basque Country", and, in fact, not all basques consider that Spain or France can't be called their own (not numbers). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.58.34.170 (talk • contribs) 13 Nov 2005.
I agree...this could easily be added to the Basque people page and would clean things up a bit... -Akiora 18:41, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merger. Many ethnic group articles have a separate section for diaspora populations. //Big Adamsky 00:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

text: This is addressed, although the source I have states the Boise Basque population is 15,000. --Faustus37 18:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has this all been merged to Basque people, in which case this can turn into a redirect? Or are we still waiting for someone to do that? -- Jmabel | Talk 01:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the articles should be merged, since Basque people is quite a large article as it is. --Vizcarra 01:22, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Has this been merged?

message: It would be very helpful if a list of prominent members of the Basque diaspora could be created. Any takers?
Godzilla Awoken 21:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prominent members of the Basque diaspora 

message: Just to note that Durango is a village in the Basque province of Vizcaya. The northern Mexico province is Nueva Vizcaya, its capital is Durango. Not a coincidence, it was founded by a Basque explorer. This is a good source for the diaspora to Mexico and elsewhere  - An Enduring Legacy - the story of the Basques in Idaha By John Bieter, Mark Bieter Dougweller (talk) 18:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexico, Columbia, Uruguay, Idaho, Venezuela - reliable source 

message: What about a section on Basques in the rest of Spain and France? --Error (talk) 23:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spain and France 

message: I don't understand the map. Are this really numbers of people not a percentage of the general population??? That doesn't make sense as the countries have a very different size! --Kersti Nebelsiek (talk) 10:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Court of piepowders

message: "though they technically continue to exist even in the absence of officers, cases, or premises."
:Is there a source for this?  In what sense do they continue to "exist"? -- Beland 00:03, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The article says that the last active court (Stag & Hounds in Bristol, which I'm currently writing an article about) lost its juristicion in 1971 act - but others under the 1977 act - therefore how can the Bristol one be the last? — Rod talk 20:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bristol court 1971 v 1977 act
Talk:Trnava

message: Wikimedia Commons has more media related to: Trnava
:This sentence at the bottom of the article may be true, but if one clicks on that link they can only read the following: (There is currently no text in this page)
--Adolar von Csobánka (Talk) 00:06, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I have fully protected the article for a period of 2 days. Please use this time to discuss the changes. If either participate continue reverting after the protections expires, further action may be necessary. Seraphim♥  Whipp 11:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit warring

message: Imho the article need many arrangements to be done.
At first I propose further standardisation of sections and their order, in regard to other article on cities and towns.
I.e. History/ Geography/ Demographics/ Government/ Culture/ Education/ Sports/ Notable People.
See e.g. articles on Munich, Zagreb, Split, Vienna, Glasgow, St. Petersburg etc., which are well elaborated articles,
Then, let us be rigorous and consistent in content itself, providing facts with references.
Then in someway try to eliminite inadequaces "to separate the wheat from the chaff" as they say.
E.g. in section Notable people,however difficult it be, because of subjectiveness of matter.
... So I dare to change sections order to current: History/ Geography/ Demographics/ Municipal government/ Culture/ Education ... see Munich, Zagreb, Split, Vienna, Glasgow, St. Petersburg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipcontributor800 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: I propose to make a move.
This part ,,Jewish history" to rename ,,Jews in Trnava"
and
move it to ,,Demographics section"
Reasons: Because in fact it has not suited well to general history of the town.
(The Jews were always a small minority, not participating on general events)
But is more suitable, according to content of that passage to historical development of demographics, as it has been established by previous edits.
(In fact, if you read, that passage, you will see, that it is about development numbers, i.e. demographics of Jews)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipcontributor800 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish history renaming and moving
Talk:Jules Bastien-Lepage

message: An exhibition is devoted to Jules Bastien-Lepage at the Musée d'Orsay in Paris, from 6th March till 13th May 2007. The works will be on display at the World centre for peace of Verdun from 14th June till 3rd September 2007. Baronnet 13:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 exhibition in Paris 

message: It is generally accepted that Bastien-Lepage was a major influence on the artists known as the Glasgow Boys (not all actually from Glasgow) and other British painters of the later 19th century.  I don't have the time or expertise to write this up, but someone might take it on.  There are several books on the Glasgow Boys, including the catalogue of a major exhibition a few years ago, which included works by B-L to show the influence.86.135.4.21 (talk) 21:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence
Talk:VideoCrypt

message: I found out tonight that the BBC used a line shuffling variation of VideoCrypt named VideoCrypt "S" for their overnight subscription based BBC Select service. I wonder if someone technical minded could add information about this type of VideoCrypt into the article. I have found two references for the encryption system which can be cited in the article.
===References===
* Smart Card News - February 1993 newsletter (page 30-31)
* BBC Research and Development Report - November 1995
Thank you. --tgheretford (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added information on VideoCrypt-S. I used Black Book 5 (European Scrambling Systems 5) to check the information. It was a heavily customised version of VideoCrypt that was, as far as I know, only used by the BBC for its Select service. --Jmccormac 23:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much. --tgheretford (talk) 18:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: VideoCrypt "S"

message: * Smart Card News - February 1993 newsletter (page 30-31)
* BBC Research and Development Report - November 1995
Thank you. --tgheretford (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added information on VideoCrypt-S. I used Black Book 5 (European Scrambling Systems 5) to check the information. It was a heavily customised version of VideoCrypt that was, as far as I know, only used by the BBC for its Select service. --Jmccormac 23:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much. --tgheretford (talk) 18:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Ive changed the VideoGuard has not been beaten to "apart from Reverse Engineering". Because it has, in a way been beaten.
If anyone wants to change it back because i havent explained it enough. Try and correct it so it does make sense.
: The reverse engineering comment made it sound like it was beaten and the subscriber smartcard had been reverse engineered. This would have been significant news. At the moment, there does not appear to be any such compromise on Videoguard hence the confusion. Jmccormac (talk) 12:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  VideoGuard not been beaten
Talk:Calaca, Batangas

message: What is meant by the term '1st class' Light current 00:13, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:S/2003 J 2

message: The following formula was placed on the page to explain the size of Jupiter's Hill Sphere, but I don't think we need that much detail, we can just give the result of the formula.
:\approx a_j \sqrt[3]{\frac{m_j}{3 M_s}},
:where a_j and m_j are Jupiter's semi-major axis and mass, and M_s is the Sun's mass. This comes out as about 
The Singing Badger 00:28, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The orbital period says 981 days (correct), but "60 years"...?
What formula is being used there?
DFoofnik 31 August 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.230.222.136 (talk) 07:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The orbital period units? 