Talk:Ottoman–Habsburg wars

message: I feel this article needs improvement because of the many ethnic bias.
* János Szapolyai was not puppet, but the most powerful landlord of the kingdom. His father was the Palatinus (nádor), his mother was a princess, himself voivod of Transylvania, Palatinus, commander of the largest royal army after the Battle of Mohács. In 1505 he was nominated as a king if Ulászló II dies without a heir. He wore the insignia of St Stephen, was crowned with the Holy Crown in the crowning city of Székesfehérvár by the chief representative of the Catholic Church and elected by the remains of the council in Tokaj, which are the mandatory criteria to be king of Hungary.
* The article explicitly picks nations, such as Austrians, which lead to confusion. Indeed, Ferdinand I was the Archduke of Austria, but he is born is Spain from the Castile, his Chief of the German Mercenary Army was the Italian Giovanni Battista Castaldo.
* "However, at Eger the Austrians achieved a stunning victory, thanks in part to the efforts of the civilians present." - Eger was not defended by Austrians at all, even Ferdinand didn't sent his army.
--János Fehér (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic bias 

message: Still making this article. Hang on don't delete, please.Tourskin 22:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The retreat of the Ottoman army was hampered by the brave resistance of Bratislava which once more bombarded the Ottomans." is POV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.228.51.75 (talk) 18:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: *Fill in the sections with more details
*Include information about the Thirty Years War and how it made the Emperor depend more on Austria
*Talk about the Spanish War of Succession and how it meant that Spain was no longer friendly to Austria's war against the Turks.
*Add references for these.
*Add section for end; conclusion of war, overall strategy and tactics between the two sides, etc.
Tourskin (talk) 20:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do list 

message: the infobox says the wars ended with the Treaty of Sistova, but the lead paragraph says the wars ended only before the World War I because both empires are allied with the Germans. Which one is true? What are the provisions of this treaty? Arkwatem (talk) 05:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  War conclusion 

message: The articles writes things such as this:"In 1663, the Ottomans launched a disastrous invasion of Austria, ending at the Battle of St Gotthard. The battle was won by the Christians, chiefly through the brave attack of 6,000 French troops led by La Feuillade and Coligny." 
Well, the Ottoman's foes weren't not just Christians. They were also Catholics. Instead of calling the Otttoman's foes as "Christians", the article must call them as Catholics. Agre22 (talk) 01:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholics, not just Christians.

message: In this article, one of the sections is Rise of Russia. Why do we have this section ? It is true that Russians allied themselves with Habsburgs in 1683-99, 1735-1739 and 1787-1792 wars. But the section Rise of Russia deals with the events of 16th century and has nothing to do with Habsburgs. So it is completely unrelated to the main theme of the article. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrelated section 

message: The image in the side bar is quite meaningless. This 2007-downloaded image by Gabr-el seems to be taken from a 2005-downloaded imege by Xosé used in the article Mamluks. Well Mamluks lived in Egypt and had nothing in common with the wars in Europe. This image should be replaced by a more appropriate one. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mamluk image in European war. 

message: Missing the rather major bit where Tunisia changed hands twice in 1573 and 74. Kind of hard to call Selim II a sot and failure when he permanently ended Christian control in North Africa, but even John of Austria's ultimately failed invasion deserves treatment here and on his page. — LlywelynII 20:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Tunisia

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: This section is far too large for a page which it is only tangentially linked to. The Ottoman expedition to Aceh and the Ottoman-Portuguese rivalry in the Indian ocean need to be covered, but it seems to me there's far too much detail of Philippine and Brunei history than the subject matter of this article warrants. Ecrm87 (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  War in the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asia