Talk:Bradford (Park Avenue) A.F.C.

message: :Image:Bradford Park Avenue AFC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Bradford Park Avenue AFC.jpg

message: Not sure there's much point in having a separate article for Horsfall Stadium just yet..can always be split off if/when there's enough verifiable info. Paulbrock 12:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Having a separate article does no harm and encourages development.GordyB 19:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge stadium article

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Bradford Park Avenue were an English Football League club who went bust in the early 1970s. A new club called Bradford Park Avenue began to exist in 1988. There's sod all to connect them. Or as the highly reliable and fairly-spot-on-generally-like football website impstalk has it: 
Can we not indulge any fantasies and split the article, a la Accrington Stanley, Wembley Stadium and all manner of attempts to trade under a former name? Me677 (talk) 19:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The club is to all intents and purposes the same team. See here. Although I do realise your concerns. The extremely reliable FCHD site also backs up that claim. Peanut4 (talk) 19:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree the article should be split to differentiate between the original club (1863-1970) and the current one (1987). And there seems to be a consensus to move ahead with this. The article should include the rugby period before 1907 as this was the same club. Mooretwin (talk) 09:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I'm going to proceed with this. Mooretwin (talk) 09:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Very disappointing that the split into two articles has been reversed without discussion. What do secondary sources say? Do they recognise the current club as being the same as the original? Mooretwin (talk) 13:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

text: *This one doesn't Mooretwin (talk) 13:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was very disappointing that you took it upon yourself to undertake such a large and controversial series of edits, and that you managed to botch it up so spectacularly at the same time. This needs careful consideration and deep discussion before we attempt it. GiantSnowman 18:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: How did I botch it up?  I agree it needs careful consideration, but I left several weeks for others to comment and nobody did, so I was bold. Mooretwin (talk) 09:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

text: Well, Mooretwin, that is a commercial/personal website, while the official website certainly seems to have a signle cohesive history covering all Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a primary source, with a vested interest in portraying itself as a continuation of the historic club. We need to decide what to do based on the secondary sources. Mooretwin (talk) 09:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Secondary source - "Before rising again" Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that an archaeology web site could be considered as a reliable secondary source on this matter, although I do note that it refers to the original club being liquidated. What do others think? Mooretwin (talk) 13:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The current club is a successor to the original, and I see no need for the articles to be separated. Middlesbrough were liquidated in 1986 and the current club is a successor – the corporate entity is not necessarily the same thing as the club itself. There was a good letter from a corporation lawyer in When Saturday Comes this month on the subject. Number 57 14:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Demerge article

message: I am calling upon all users with knowledge on the West Yorkshire Derby(s) so that the article can be expanded. Any help or co-operation would be much appreciated. Regards IJA (talk) 14:50, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Can you please help expand West Yorkshire Derby?

message: Substituted at 10:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bradford Park Avenue A.F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041021140701/http://www.aiartists.com/wmcglaughlin/reviews.html to http://liveweb.archive.org/http:/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bradford Park Avenue A.F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130403050246/http://tc1.bpafc.com/ to http://tc1.bpafc.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Should there really be achievements of other sports listed for the club in the honours section? I know they have a close connection with those sports from the time of their origins but surely there are seperate articles for those to be listed. Davefelmer (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rugby League and Rugby Union