lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Japanese Bobtail

message: This section needs improvement.  For one thing, it should be real prose not a clipped "checklist". See Turkish Van#Breed standard for an example.  Secondly, it needs to be clear on what aspects of this aggregated summarized standard are different in some standards and which they are (with citations). — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 19:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Breed standard section

message: Please be on the lookout for spammy attempts to insert links to breeder sites and directories as "sources". I've recently removed two of these.  They may take the form of short summaries of the breed, cobbled together from memory or perhaps from uncited publsihed sources, but they do not constitute reliable sources for Wikipedian purposes, and do not help establish verifiability. They are generally also a conflict of interest, inserted by people promoting the site, and violate our external linking standards.  Such links are common in cat and dog articles and frequently reverted, but tend to stick around in articles like this one, about smaller breeds with few regular editors. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 19:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bogus sources
Template talk:Types of take-off and landing

message: Can anyone think of a better way to lay this out? -Joseph 20:40, 2004 Sep 8 (UTC)
:As the template exists in early November 2014, it might be useful to separate the rocket/spacecraft-related terms of use from the aviation-related terms of use. 
:Here is what the result looks like in 2014:
Takeoff
Assisted take-off
Balanced field takeoff
JATO
Non-rocket spacelaunch
Rejected takeoff
Rocket launch
Zero-length launch
Takeoff + landing
CATOBAR
CTOL
STOBAR
STOL
STOVL
V/STOL
VTHL/VTOHL
VTOL
Launch and recovery cycle
VTVL
VTHL
HTHL
HTVL
Landing
Belly landing
Crosswind landing
Deadstick landing
Emergency landing
Forced landing
Hard landing
SRVL
Short-field landing
Splashdown
Touch-and-go landing
Water landing / Ditching
Floating landing platform
:However, I don't have a strong opinion on that as of right now, so will just leave the comment here for others to consider.  N2e (talk) 12:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  template layout 

message: Types of...
----
...
STOBAR
----
JATO/RATO
ZLL/ZLTO
Since RATO redirects to JATO, maybe the template should be changed, and RATO and JATO put in a single line as "JATO/RATO", like it's done for ZLL/ZLTO? conio.h • talk 02:58, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[JATO]]/[[RATO]]
Talk:Praetorians

message: For a September 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Praetorians
----
I apologize for the term "vandalism" used in "Edit summary". I didn't pay attention to look at who blanked the page. I understand that you had your reasons to demove the redirect. However I'd recommend to look into Wikipedia:Redirect article. Mikkalai 21:05, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Credenda/Agenda

message: I think the controversy section is a bit shabby. Paedocommunion is already mentioned above, and high church liturgy isn't all that controversial except in micropresbyterian denominations (the conservative Presbyterian Church in America allows it, for instance). The criticism/controversy should be cited from reliable sources, but it should be with regard to C/A's particular position, not high church liturgy in general. I think the section could be integrated into the rest of the article without the big heading since there doesn't seem to be all that much controversy about the magazine itself. --Flex (talk/contribs) 13:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Umm... yes, I agree... I hate to ask this, but wan't it you who introduced high church liturgy into the article? StAnselm 14:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I did add the bit about high church liturgy only as an attempt to clarify the existing, vague objection about the regulative principle, which was added by the creator of the article. Anyway, let's go ahead with the suggested changes. (PS, I notice you sometimes use bullet points in your responses. May I humbly recommend that you use only colons except on AfDs and the like - cf. WP:TPG#Layout?) --Flex (talk/contribs) 14:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. StAnselm 14:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:Baring Island

message: Baring Island
Baffin, Unorganized, NU, Canada
Google coordinates : C676W6R2+F8
maps.app.goo.gl (anti spam filter) / KQy7tivLsF2roTsM8  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean-Christophe BENOIST (talk • contribs) 14:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that there appears to be an island of that name, but if nothing is available about it except that it exists at these coordinates, then there's no material for an article. Might as well redirect to an article that at least uses the name in another connection. If you can unearth some more material about the island, please feel free to reinstate and expand. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is no material for this article, it should be deleted, not be falsely and randomly redirected. The redirection is still wrong and Baring Bay still nonsense with this redirection. By the way, I went to this article because this island is mentionned by Jules Verne as a halt for The_Adventures_of_Captain_Hatteras, at the very place indicated above. And probably the place also for the HMS Inverstigator painting that is in the article history. I wanted to restore a situation when this elements can be elaborated in the future, but this will not be the case. --Jean-Christophe BENOIST (talk) 08:38, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Expand away... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Banks Island
Talk:Ricardo Domínguez

message: On 13 Aug 2004, this page was nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ricardo Dominguez for a record of the debate.  Rossami 21:38, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Creek

message: True or false: this article belongs at Creek (disambiguation) and Creek (stream) at Creek. 66.245.79.225 22:58, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Creek (stream) isn't even an article! It redirects to stream. Even if it were an article there isn't much it could include other than a simple dictionary definition. Creek (people), Creek language and Creek mythology have the potential to be large articles if someone with the relevant knowledge comes along. What you are talking about is primary topic disambiguation, which is only to be used if there is something obviously more important, such as Radioactivity and Radioactivity (album). "Whatever (disambiguation)" is not intuitive and should be avoided where possible by having the diambiguation at "Whatever". — Trilobite (Talk) 23:38, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary topic

message: I  distinctly remember from my college linguistics class that in the UK, "creek" is a synonym for river... it could essentially mean any body of flowing water, no matter how big. In the US, it seems to refer distinctly to a small stream. -Artificial Silence 02:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Oxford English Dictionary gives "I.1. A narrow recess or inlet in the coast line of the sea" as the first meaning. It does offer, "2. As part of a river or river-system. a. An inlet or short arm of a river, such as runs up into widened mouth of a ditch or small stream, or fills any short ravine or cutting that joins the river. (This is merely an occasional extension of sense I.)" -- Donald Albury 03:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US / UK English 

message: I"m not quite sure how to amend this text:
:* creek, a small stream
I'm not going to start listing the hundreds of BC "creeks" which are actually small rivers - and some of them are big rivers, especially in comparison to small rivers (even reasonable-sized rivers) in areas of teh world that are not as montane and not as wet....suffice to say that hte wording mabye needs a bit of adjustment.  "In very wet, mountainous areas, this term may also refer to a river" or something to that effect....samples are Rutherford Creek, Meager Creek, Moseley Creek, Fitzsimmons Creek, Herrick Creek, but many many more also.Skookum1 (talk) 16:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Creeks" in BC, Alaska etc.
Talk:Blank cheque

message: Please, someone clean up this mess! Lindenb 08:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor grammar 

message: Per the manual of style, one spelling of the word cheque/check should be adopted throughout the article. While most of the article uses the "que" version, the title is the "ck" version. Opinions? Unless someone wants to move the article, or sees something I don't, I'll go ahead and standardize it to the "ck" version in a couple of days if no one objects. GoodnightmushTalk 23:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, if there's no objection, I'm going to change it to "cheque" and move the article. The consensus at cheque uses that spelling, so it would seem to make sense to mirror that spelling here. Thoughts? --Ckatzchatspy 21:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the "USA" reference because, well, it's never "cheque" here unless it's some brands of traveler's cheques! 207.210.134.83 (talk) 19:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spellings 

message: , I shortened the SD because the target is 40 characters. The prior one was around 60, and it did not even align with the main topic of the article - per the hatnote, the article is about the metaphor. The long SD was about the literal meaning, which is just stated in the beginning of the article as an introduction to explain the metaphor. SDs can be imprecise, they just need to tell the reader they are at the right article (just like the hatnote "This article is about the metaphor"). MB 03:17, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You make a good case. I'll revert myself.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description  

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Carte blanche. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 8#Carte blanche until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Carte blanche" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dublin Pearse railway station

message: Err, shouldn't this article be at Pearse Station? Admittedly it's a couple of years since I was last in Dublin, but if memory serves, the street outside the station was never renamed from Westland Row. I seem to remember all the station name signs say something like "Staisiun Piarsach/Pearse Station" (apologies for misspellings). -- Arwel 23:56, 8 September 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I believe in the 1960s (and probably before and for some time after) the platform numbering south-west to north-east was Platforms 1 & 2 : terminus platforms.  Platform 3 is what is currently the northbound through line and Platform 4 what is currently southbound.  Platform 5 was the terminus platform to the north-east, it was generally used by boat trains to Dún Laoghaire.  Platform 4 (Only?) was used for both arrivals and departures to Galway and Sligo etc until these went to Connolly.   Some of this is my memory and I can't currently cite it.  Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform Numbering 

message: I have seen some mentioned, unconfirmed, the station originally had turntable and single platform as per Harcourt Street.  The source also mentioned the through lines were 22" or so too low to go over the road and had to be built up and the platforms a the Westland Row end had to be built up (top the platform edge) and if my memory serves me right (very risky) there was quite an incline from Easons up the the plaform edge, and would be fascinated to know if this is still the case, having no reason to go to Pearse much since the rename.  Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turntable 

message: The precise details of the original 1934 trackwork may be uncertain, but a diagram from 1935.... Should these be 1834 and 1835? JoeBrennan (talk) 22:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks well spotted please WP:TROUT me.  Checking referencing it was plate IX not plate VIII.  I might switch this to Harvard referencing at some point.Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which century?
Talk:Everybody Loves a Happy Ending

message: I think that the description of this album, though short, could use a cleanup in terms of tone of voice/3rd-person.  Migp 20:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'd just LOVE to know who classified all the TFF albums as "Psychedelic Rock". There's no way in God's green earth that TFF qualifies as Psych rock. New Wave, Pop rock? Sure thing! If there's a question on this, simply refer to Allmusic.com. Over the past 8 years, it's been my experience that they're 99.5 percent accurate on their genre classifications. Edit Centric (talk) 21:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is with these genres?
Talk:Elo

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :ELO (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#ELO (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 16:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ELO (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:College of William & Mary

message: Removal of Promotional Content in accordance to Wikipedia Policy outlined in Talk:George Mason University#Removal of Notable faculty and alumni. 129.174.255.57 (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a lot of vandalism.  If you choose to have others regard your attempts as in good faith, you should take some time to read the manual of style and lead section TEDickey (talk) 22:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional Content
Talk:Bancroft Davis

message: This article should be at either J.C. Bancroft Davis or Bancroft Davis. Which? Everyking 00:49, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: But we're supposed to title articles about people according to the most common form of their name, so it shouldn't be at this title. Everyking 19:55, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Look, I have a copy of the Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court myself, and it frequently gives entries under the full names of people without regard to the common convention; see for instance the entries on Rehnquist and Hugo Black. I'll move it to Bancroft Davis in accordance with Wikipedia style unless some argument can be made in favor of the longer title. Everyking 17:41, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Article 

message: just an outside remark that I would find it useful if someone knows/can credibly describe how and by whom Davis was appointed to the position of SCOTUS reporter? Did the Chief Justice do it? Others with influence got him that position? What were the politics behind the appointment?  I've no idea, but it would be valuable to know in this article if anyone is familiar with the details of that history. 67.187.198.110 (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bancroft Davis' appointment as reporter for the Supreme Court
Talk:BK

message: True or false: this article belongs at BK (disambiguation) with BK being a re-direct to Burger King. 66.245.108.29 01:14, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...or is that just something I do?Arry 20:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bk=Book 

message: A disambiguation page should not be used simply because something can be abbreviated BK. If it is not so abbreviated on the target page and you feel it should be, then you can add the abbreviation there (provided you have a good Source). Otherwise, the link should be deleted from this page. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Target pages should use the term itself. 

message: This page should be renamed to simply "BK", per Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Is there a primary topic?. 109.225.98.60 (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 11:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: BK (disambiguation) →  – Based on the pageviews, the BK redirect has been viewed 3 times per day whereas the DAB page has gotten 13 views per day. While BK is the main short form for Burger King, this suggests that Burger King isn't many users' first thought when searching for "BK". That combined with this suggests there isn't really a good candidate for primary topic, so that's why I believe the DAB should be PRIMARYTOPIC.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 06:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 January 2023 

message: WikiNav for January 2023 says '587
incoming pageviews', 'The actual number of incoming pageviews received by BK is 240', and shows 30 outgoing clicks to Burger King. So far it seems like the move was correct, because whichever of these statistics makes more sense, all indicate that there isn't really overwhelming interest in a primary topic. --Joy (talk) 10:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Followup to move
Talk:Spaniards

message: Spaniard is an offensive term and the correct form should be Spanish. We have Spanish for Spain natives and Hispanic for all the Spanish speaking people so there's no need to use offensive terms. 144.178.129.245 (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you say that it is offensive? --Jotamar (talk) 23:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Hi! Im Spanish and i don't know why it's offensive, could you explain it a bit further, if I may ask? 88.5.24.153 (talk) 08:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the name to Spanish People. 

message: After the Muslim conquest, the Christian population was reduced to the lowest status, under both Muslims and Jews. 2600:4041:5D8A:9600:C80E:292A:ED43:AFA1 (talk) 04:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 February 2023
Talk:Timba

message: JK, thanks for you message and for inserting the box. 
Why all the links to pages that don't exist? I really don't think that's necessary -and besides, it doesn't look great. Whoever will be writing those pages will probably find their way here, and link up whatever needs to be linked up, no?
kash
I like links to nonexistent pages. It calls attention to what needs to be done. For example, I would have never put stuff up for Inti-Illimani or Nueva trova or ... had I not seen their names in red and thought "what kind of encyclopedia is this!?"
—Johnkarp 04:53, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Tdammers on July 18, 2006 added that Salsa typically had a 2-3 son clave, and Timba a 3-2 rumba clave. This was changed on October 19, 2006 to 3-2 son clave and 2-3 rumba clave. From my listening experience, Tdammers was right. Those that agree, please change back. Those that don't, please elucidate. --91.32.26.39 09:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typical clave directions 

message: "Contrary to (early) salsa, timba makes no claim to social or political messages, partly because of the political circumstances in Cuba."
This is technically true, because it would be unwise to make this overt claim.    However, there *are* many social messages, and some political.  The political ones are inevitably in disguise to pass the censors, the social ones often presented with a humor component.  Songs have frequently been banned from radio and TV, and artists got their working permits revoked because of lyrical content.  Many lyrics can be read as double entendre and you can never be sure if this is intentional. Csmalt (talk) 15:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stylistic aspects 

message: while I have heard much from ng la banda and los van van, I still would like to know which songs specifically contain references to classical works from bach for piano.
72.188.180.87 (talk) 06:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  songs as examples?
Talk:Violence/Poll

message: Please place your votes in this section, subject to the guidelines above.  Sign your vote with a timestamp (~~~~.)
===Yes===
# 
# 
# 
===No===
# --CCJ 22:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes

message: # --CCJ 22:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No
Talk:Diana (mythology)

message: There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome#Describing gods as Sabine which relates to recent edits here and in other articles. NebY (talk) 18:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Describing gods as Sabine 

message: Diana is the best.one,she is the daughter of Jupiter and Latona.fun fact,Jupiter and latona were not married.fun fact,Jupiter actual wife is Juno.second,Diana is the twin sister of Apollo.fun fact, Apollo is a Greek god which means Diana is also Greek god 2603:8001:E83F:34F2:89C6:5FF:D134:5EDA (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diana the god
Talk:3909 04

message: From VfD:
I pulled this off Wikipedia:Cleanup; despite my rewrite, I have no reason to believe this warrants an article of its own.  The legend is well-documented on RMS Titanic, in a section which, despite needing a rewrite itself, is longer than this stub.  Austin Hair 06:14, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
*Merge & redirect - not that we need a VFD vote for that! —Stormie 06:52, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
** I was initially hesitant to bring this to VfD, but I figured I'd play it safe (especially given its listing on WP:CU).  Austin Hair 06:57, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
*Do not merge, because, as the nomination says, it's already in the Titanic article.  Redirect or delete.  Redirect if anyone really believes this is going to be a search term.  Delete if not.  Geogre 13:40, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Ilyas Akhmadov

message: Is it an actual Soviet rank? --HanzoHattori 20:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is not. 24.218.221.252 (talk) 23:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Lieutenant?

message: I think regardless of one's views, describing events of 1996 as an unquestionable victory of Chechens, is not neutral. That is definitely not the Russian point of view, and not even all sympathizers of Chechen rebels would claim a "victory". Also, the article fails to mention that Ilyasov at one point was an assistant to Shamil Basayev, a job deemed, shall we say, somewhat controversial by many. 24.218.221.252 (talk) 23:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a "grand" total of 1 sentence devoted to the 1994-6 war : "In 1996, when the Chechens defeated the poorly organised Russian army, he retired to private life."... the words Chechen victory are not even in the sentence. And would you care to site that? (it's not really relevant, though, considering the habitual post changing in Ichkeria's gov't at the time). --Yalens (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality