Talk:Bulgarian–Ottoman wars

message: This is a very one-sided biased article making little or no effort to look at the Ottoman Turkish references. It has no reference of Turkish origin, even though one side in this battle is Ottoman Turks. If the Turkish references were used, the bias of this article will be self-evident. The reason is that Turkish historians do not  include a battle that is given the name of Maritsa Battle or Chernomen Battle that has taken place on 26 September 1371. In Ottoman-Turkish history books there is a battle called Sirp Sindigi (Rout of the Serbs) which has taken place on 26 September 1364. References in English are found in S.J.Shaw (1976) History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey Vol.1 Empire of Gazis Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p.18 and  D.Nicolle, (1983), Armies of the Ottoman Turks 1300-1774, Osprey Pub. London, p.28. Noyder (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please improve the article if you can. The lack of Turkish sources is motivated by the inaccesibility of such sources to the editors who have worked on this article (either because of the language barrier, or their unavailability in local libraries). A referenced Turkish perspective is more than welcome (this doesn't mean such perspective should remove the Bulgarian perspective from the article, both POVs should be presented).Baltaci (talk) 20:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! José Luiz  talk 22:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] - section "The fall of the Rhodopes" 

message: The author of this article fails to distinguish Selcuk turks from the Ottomans when reffering to the battles of Momchil. 31.182.223.191 (talk) 22:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 1) in English, they are known as Seljuk Turks. 2) after the fall of the Great Seljuk Empire, the only remnant was that group of Seljuks in Asia Minor, known as the Ottomans - the other various realms all being obliterated by the Mongols.  -HammerFilmFan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.25.27 (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ottoman vs. Selcuk