lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SUPER

message: My attention has been called to , a site page intended " to create awareness about research projects and their results it is important to publicizes relevant information. Wikipedia is one of the Top 10 information sources on the Internet and hence a good candidate to inform a wider public about research projects and their results."   This page was given there as an example, including the infobox used in the article. 
To say that i am appalled is putting it mildly. A program whose results are not yet accomplished will very rarely   be notable. The project described in this article would be a good illustration of that,. But the article was started in 2006, and may possibly have accomplished something since that date--in which case the published results, and the comments on them by outside people, need to be included.  Wikipedia exists to describe things that are already notable, according to WP:N, and  to show it by 3rd party sources, according to WP:RS 
I am not nominating this for deletion immediately, in the hope that adequate material can be included. In any case, I would suggest removing most of the present text, for, to be frank, it seems like promotional puffery and jargon. Section 3, project advantages,is particularly unsuitable. I would suggest you try to describe the project's purposes briefly, and emphasize the accomplishments, not the intentions. I suggest you list references that have been published in peer-reviewed journals, not your own technical reports.  (some conferences are also peer-reviewed,and, depending on the standing, we sometimes consider them suitable--see WP:RS and its discussion page. )    DGG ( talk ) 23:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Immediately" has passed a long time ago. 109.189.26.195 (talk) 16:14, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: some difficulties
Talk:Alliance for an Open Europe

message: Hi
Can I change the word announced to established or formed in this sentence?
In July 2006, the Movement for European Reform was announced, a broadly similar body, though with a formal mandate from the leadership of the British Conservatives and Czech Civic Democrats. In February/March 2007 the Bulgarian Union of Democratic Forces also joined the organisation.
Thank you
LOBOSKYJOJO (talk) 05:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix this Sentence
Talk:Full-face diving mask

message: When was the fullface mask introduced? Who made the first one?  Trekphiler (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Get wet

message: Done today.
Please feel free to comment, copyedit, request citations where they may be needed and suggest improvements. Or just make improvements. There may be mistakes, I will come back and look for them later. I am too familiar with the subject to be much good at guessing what is adequately obvious and therefore needs no citation, and what other people will want cited, so I am going to wait for requests. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big rewrite 

message: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as  is optional.Needs more refs and those which exist are mostly bare urls 
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for , although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.Fairly good coverage, could be improved, but good enough. 
The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.Reasonably structured. 
The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.Looks OK. 
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.Sufficiently and appropriately illustrated. 
Referencing needs a lot of work, otherwise quite close. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 17:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class review
Talk:Unión Espiritista Cristiana de Filipinas, Inc.

message: The information written about this topic are basically from the understanding of the writer and should not be considered as a reliable source for understanding the true teachings and background of Union Espiritista Cristiana de Filipinas, Inc. Allankardec (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Irrelevance of the Information

message: It is in deed an honor that the articles were given time and read its deficiencies;
As a new "could- be" contributor, I am very much willing to submit my self to your advices and guidelines, and learn how to prepare relevant articles for your consideration.
The way I look at it, there are lot of things to improve in writing an article especially to this prestigious Wikipedia, thus please help me on what and how to improve the article and give me time to be able to cope up with your standards.
Respectfully yours
(bensj 04:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Help 

message: Thank you for revising your work brother Allankardec (talk) 01:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thank You
Talk:Bestial Warlust

message: I couldn't be happier about that.  After having people try to delete the article I created, I have come off victorious.  Glorious defeat for the dissenters who thought Bestial Warlust wasn't a noteworthy band.  Proved them wrong.  Of course this could not have been achieved if not for the people who agreed this article was worth keeping.Navnløs 17:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: look at the sources if you don't like it.Navnløs 19:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This Article is for Keeps

message: Alright, you'r entitled to your opinion, though it means nothing to me.  You seem to be the one that does know what they are talking about...are you 16?  To whom it may concern: namely you, know that I am now going to get you banned (hopefully) for being quite offensive and using degenerative language.  Obviously, intellectuality is not your strong suit, because if anyone is acting like a child, that's you.Navnløs 18:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A few minutes ago, I would have agreed that the comments by 202.1.168.129 were quite offensive.  But after having seen the stage names of the band members, 202.1.168.129 seems polite in comparison.  Just my opinion.  Wanderer57 18:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the reply.  I agree people should not be offensive to one another.  Should a respected site such as Wikipedia publicize those offensive stage names?  It seems to me one of the chief points of the article is to use the names as frequently as possible.  If I counted correctly, it has "Corpse Molestation" seven times, and "Corpse Molester" a couple more for good measure.  Wanderer57 19:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks.  I'm curious why "Corpse Molestation" appears under associated act.  Wanderer57 01:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Just to answer to the question beforehand, Wikipedia is not to be censored no matter how evil/dark/obscene the material could be (see:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not censored). --CircafuciX 19:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WOOT, agreed. Navnløs 23:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: okay then
Talk:Anarchy (international relations)

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Realism in international relations - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: A state of anarchy has a hierarchy, of volunteers whom can blend ideas and expect others to take on overflows of work or switching responsibilities fluidly. Those people won't be stuck in ultra demanding positions, they have time to do other family/community hours while also contributing to the "state" They also don't need police enforcement, because all of the good people will have neighborhood watch programs. 2604:CB00:107:D900:D4B1:E773:FB0E:C1A5 (talk) 22:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anarchy
Talk:Yugoslavian presidential election, 2000

message: Can't seem to fix the template. Help needed. --PaxEquilibrium 22:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Yugoslavian parliamentary election, May 1992 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Jagüey Grande

message: Revisen los barrios de Jaguey Grande
Son:
Barrio de Aguacate
Barrio Las delicias
Barrio Llega y pon
Barrio Australia
Barrio El Circuito Sur
Barrio La guayabita
Barrio San Bernardo (Canta Rana)
Barrio El molino
Barrio El Hospital  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.127.207.152 (talk) 07:48, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Pee-Chee folder

message: A picture might be a good idea. 68.118.72.22 22:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stating the obvious and making it someone else's responsibility

message: So many of my classmates (and I) spent a lot of time, er, enhancing Pee Chees. Has anyone seen a display of altered Pee Chees? ---Ransom (--71.4.51.150 (talk) 00:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.flickr.com/groups/1759287@N25/ —Wiki Wikardo 15:06, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art 

message: I don't have the specific date (1986?), but Pee Chee finally altered the original cover design when the US School Board started banning them because kids were drawing the typical fill-in pictures (overly suggestive artwork) that was being passed down from older siblings.
For example, kids would draw hairy legs on the tennis player, turn the baton the runner is carrying into a stick of dynamite, draw spikes on the baseball bat with a grenade being thrown his way, pencil in hairy armpits on the basketball player with the other driving a knife into his chest, and apparently the worst offender of all, a Kilroy was here peeking over the mountains at the skier. -- SkewsMe.com
Pee Chees haven't been banned everywhere. A Tacoma Washington school district has them on the current school supply lists @ http://www.tacoma.k12.wa.us/schools/schoolsupplylists.asp almost every school supply list in the district requires them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.149.104.136 (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banning 

message: What is the story behind the name Pee Chee? Bizzybody (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain the name. 

message: The article uses the past tense throughout, yet Mead still sells the Pee Chee folders in five different colors. http://www.mead.com/meadstore/catalog/productDetail.jsp?prodId=33022 so the article should read in the present tense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.46.56 (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was vs Is 

message: The title of the article is not hyphenated, but every time the name is used in the article it is hyphenated. Which is correct? Coliiiiin (talk) 07:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A Smithsonian article consistently uses a hyphen, and shows a clear (if defaced) image of the logo where a subtle hyphen can be seen. 107.179.129.239 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 23:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphenated?
Talk:Jellyfish (2007 film)

message: The link to "Sarah Adler" is erroneous, it links to someone that died in 1953, and not <a href=http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0012239/>this</a> Sarah Adler, who was alive in 2007, and thus played in this film.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.3.139 (talk) 21:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Weezer discography

message: Seombody keeps removing "The Greatest Man That Ever Lived" and "Troublemaker" as singles, when they were rather plainly released as singles on iTunes. The culprist is a one User:82.19.65.81.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting 

message: Listing album sales of 100 000+ for all the albums in New Zealand? Unlikeley as platinum is a 15 000 for NZ and because the "link" goes to the current NZ Top 40 singles chart...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.124.11 (talk) 05:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innacuracy 

message: Shouldn't "Dreamin'" be listed as a single? 123.100.61.101 (talk) 10:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dreamin' 

message: Is there any reason that the "promotional singles" are listed separately from the rest? JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 14:07, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles 

message: Should the three SZNZ albums released so far be added, or should that wait until the last one is released? FikaMedHasse (talk) 03:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SZNZ?
Talk:Geobacter

message: I wonder if we can start referring to Geobacter generically (not as a proper noun but an ordinary one) such as geobacter, without a capital G.
--Bill.albing 22:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't think so.  Geobacter, like a genera, is always a proper noun.
Jhay116 (talk) 20:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eleutherian Mills

message: We're writing  about the same place here as the article Hagley Museum and Library, so there might be some discussion on merging them.  For now it looks like the HM&L concentrates on the museum and this one concentrates on the mill, so I'll say leave it as is subject to further discussion.  Smallbones 16:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Hagley Museum and Library was (almost probably) the first museum in the world to commemorate a gunpowder factory; and it has 50 years of existence to cover. So that article has significance in its own right. The Eleutherian Mills represents the first US gunpowder mill, built on designs & technology imported from France and later England; it represents the foundation of the duPont company; and later the foundation of US smokeless powder industry. So this article also has significance, but it needs to be greatly expanded - it is barely a stub at present - and the mills had over 100 years of use. So, I don't think the two articles should be merged.Pyrotec 18:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, more or less, but if I had to decide now I'd say that the 2 articles would be better merged.  But with more material this could be a great article on its own.  Sorry I don't have time to research it.  I'll try to add some material from my research on Brandywine Creek, e.g. who owned the millsite (and previous mill and water use rights) beforehand.  I've toured the mills and museum and found the mills much more interesting.  Smallbones 02:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a bit more; but, like you, I'm short of time to do research at the moment. I already have some of the material and I'll start early in 2008. I hope you enjoyed the tour, its on my list to do but I've not yet visited the USA.Pyrotec 09:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I have been assigned to this article for a college course and I found this discussion interesting. I too noticed the length of the article, and not much has changed in the ten years since this discussion started. I too believe this should be its own article, though I understand the suggestion to merge them. If either of you have any suggestions to assist me in the editing process, I welcome them. CassRedd (talk) 14:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential merge?? 
Talk:Battle of Kuryłówka

message: Not neutral prejudicial language and commentary unfit for an encyclopedia. It might fly on the History channel, but not here.142.33.66.206 03:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please specify what you dislike and help out. Tymek 14:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  npov
Talk:Hector (immigration ship)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Killarnee (talk) 22:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hector (ship) →  – or  – For disambiguation. There are at least 22 ships named Hector that are discussed on Wikipedia (see  and HMS Hector). This article, marked as a low-importance article for Nova Scotia and averaging only about 38 page views per day, does not seem like a sufficiently dominant topic to justify its PDAB / WP:INCOMPLETEDAB title. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 March 2024
Talk:Bombs Away: The Story of a Bomber Team

message: I can't access the footnote source. In 1942, there were NO 5-star generals or admirals. Hap Arnold was not promoted to 5-star rank until late 1944. Since the Air Force didn't exist as a separate service, the rank general of the air force didn't exist until 1949, at which time his rank changed from general of the army to general of the air force. According to his Wikipedia article, in 1942, he held the 3-star rank of lieutenant general. Holy (talk) 16:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Arnold's rank
Talk:French frigate Africaine (1798)

message: I don't believe this ship was decommissioned in 1813 as there's an account of her escorting an East Indiaman, the Arniston, in 1815.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Socrates2008 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leupold & Stevens

message: I've heard that Leupold did not sell to the US military until 1977 because they were against the war. Anyone else heard this or can confirm its veracity?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.209.200 (talk) 00:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sales to military
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Luisosio

message: One other comment:  Luisoso seems to use Wiki jargon (especially "vandalism" but also "NPOV" and "encyclopedic") in ways which don't match up, in my opinion, with common Wikipedia understanding of these words.  For me this makes it more difficult to resolve conflicts.  (I don't know how to link to specific edits, but there are examples on his talk page, the talk page of Our Lady of Guadalupe, and the talk page of Huei tlama...)  Katsam 22:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

message: * Luisosio continues to accuse me of willful deception of readers, etc. Cleduc 05:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More of the same
Talk:Vexille

message: A Japanese commercial for Nissan is advertising one of there vehicles as the fight suits used in Vexille.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.222.81.150 (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With BDs (Blu-ray Discs), it's not "Region 1" (2, ...), but "Region A" (B, ...). Somebody with knowledge of the different releases for the film please clean that up. – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  region coding 
Talk:Aqua Teen Hunger Force season 1

message: Thanks for trying, but that color still doesn't meet the requires. You can use this website to play around with colors to see if they make the AAA mark. I'm happy to help if you like. EvergreenFir (talk) Please  12:08, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox color 
Talk:Amlexanox

message: This article may have some interesting information for expansion:
* Free full text —Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: First 2 are blog article and third is primary source...Please follow WP:MEDRS Lesion (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Article completely sourced and rewritten now, going to submit it for GA because, why not!  :) Zad68 19:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job with this article, Lesion (talk) 17:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  None of the references meet [[WP:MEDRS]] requirements... 

message: The main page says that the product has been discontinued in the USA; both McKesson and Kinray show it as discontinued on their ordering pages. Conversely, the American manufacturer, Uluru Inc., still shows it as a current product on their official web site.
I called them and asked, and they told me the product is unavailable; they are currently (12/2013) looking for a new distributor, and I should call them back in a couple of months. Unfortunately they were unable or unwilling to provide me with a written release stating this, so I can't add it to the main page (wp:or).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shalom S. (talk • contribs) 18:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinuation 

message: There's an open label human clinical trial underway, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01842282
The dosage is 50 mg. t.i.d. I'm not a Wikipedia editor, so I'll let someone else add this information to the article.108.219.39.17 (talk) 16:46, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually the conclusions of clinical trials may be incorporated once they have been commented on in a review, systematic review or meta analysis. Wikipedia tends to lag behind scientific breakthroughs because it is a general encyclopedia. For more information, please see WP:MEDRS. 94.196.234.101 (talk) 17:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clinical Trial
Talk:Dove Bar

message: The last time I bought a Dove Bar, it was labeled as "New! Reduced Calories." When I opened it up, it instantly became clear how they achieved this. It was much smaller (but still cost the same). Why isn't this mentioned? Bostoner (talk) 23:33, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduced Calories 

message: Where in Westerville, Ohio can we find Dove triple chocolate ice cream bars??? Used to be at Meijer. They no longer handle them. What store does?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:301:77F0:1670:7514:4173:1106:27BF (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triple  chocolate Dove ice cream bars
Talk:Mark Abrams

message: Does anybody know how to disambigue the Richard Rose to whom the link leads, from the REAL Richard Rose (of Aberdeen University)?  Mycomp 23:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Interstate 84 in Oregon

message: *Ruthton Point is a cape, not a settlement (so shouldn't be linked as Ruthton Point, Oregon)
*Philippi Canyon is a valley
*Threemile Canyon (Morrow County, Oregon) is a valley (and there's one in Harney County)
*Stage Gulch is a valley
*Port of Morrow is a port
*Clover Creek (Union County, Oregon) is referring either to the creek or its valley
Katr67 (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Blalock Canyon is a canyon, I've redirected Blalock Canyon, Oregon to Blalock, Oregon for now, but they are not the same thing. One is a canyon and one is a former community. Valfontis (talk) 19:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: List of corrections per GNIS (for things that aren't [[Foo, Oregon]])

message: If I were one to make improvements to this article (and other articles about interstate highways), it would be about what roads to take to get to and from the various exits involved.
WikiPro1981X (talk) 12:43, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements to This Article 
Talk:Caprino cheese

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 00:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-10-3 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Good for you. Caprino is indeed Italian for goat's cheese, but the it-Wiki article is IMO substantial enough to translate into a useful en-Wiki article on Italian goats' milk cheese. I'm happy to do the work on it myself but would appreciate the time to get round to it.HeartofaDog (talk) 12:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: De-PRODded