lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nontrinitarianism

message: The paragraph on Oneness Pentecostalism mentions that The paragraph on Oneness Pentecostals are often revered to as "Modalists" or "Sabellians" or "Jesus Only" but omits the fact that the terms are often conceded derogatory among Oneness Pentecostals.  The term “Apostolic” which is a common way Oneness Pentecostals refer to themselves is missing from the list. Jasoninkid (talk) 01:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Christian groups

message: The citation to Luther's sermon does not directly support the facts asserted by the article, and furthermore a sermon like this is a WP:PRIMARY source, which shouldn't really be used as a citation in this context, at all. I have added maintenance tags, looks kinda ugly on the lede section. Elizium23 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree, this appears to be WP:OR from a primary source. Since it's a relatively recent addition (less than two weeks ago) I'm going to remove it from the lede. If anyone thinks it should stay, let's discuss here. --FyzixFighter (talk) 19:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martin Luther citation 

message: Adding a link or saying some groups are under the Restoration Movement on this page.Apha9 (talk) 04:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restorationist 

message: Shortened short description per WP:SDSHORT. Editor2020 (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description 

message: ...who kept Jewish initiation rites such as Friday evening prayer (Shabbat), circumcision, and headscarf. 109.245.227.209 (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muhammad of Mecca, 6th century A.D. military and religious leader, was a non-Trinitarian Christian 

message: The opening paragraph, Nontrinitarianism is a form of Christianity that rejects the mainstream Christian theology of the Trinity ... Certain religious groups that emerged during the Protestant Reformation have historically been known as antitrinitarian could be read as though nontrinitarianism and antitrinitarianism refer to slightly different ideas. If they are essentially the same, it would be better to open with Nontrinitarianism, also known as antitrinitarianism, is a form of Christianity ...
Are the two terms fully interchangeable, do they have different meanings, or have they been used at different time periods for essentially the same set of beliefs? - BobKilcoyne (talk) 19:19, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Nontrinitarianism and antitrinitarianism
Talk:Text encoding

message: I thought this article was generally wrong, so rewritten.  Previous text preserved in a comment. Tim Bray 06:25, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it odd that there is no reference to the character encoding article. I'll add that in a "See also" section, but I think there is probably significant overlap between this article and that one, and I think we should try to work on figuring out a way to disambiguate or merge them. Is there a difference between "text encoding" and "character encoding"? Would, say, Morse Code be under one and not the other? — mjb 01:26, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Upon closer inspection, there was nothing in this article to differentiate "text encoding" from "character encoding", and all of the content is, I believe, covered elsewhere, so this article now redirects to the character encoding article. I merged the intro paragraphs but did not see anything else in this article that was necessary to reproduce in the other.
I think someone once wanted "text encoding" to be a separate article because "character encoding" was being used to specifically apply to low-level character encodings in computers, and thus excluded more general character encodings used in non-computer-based communication, like Morse Code and ASCII, as well as higher-level encodings such as Vietnamese Quoted-Readable. However, the character encoding article now covers the former examples, and the latter, if they ever were in the article, aren't anymore, so this article is (was) redundant. Perhaps there should be a term for the higher-level encodings, but "text encoding" certainly isn't ideal. — mjb 04:05, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged with character encoding
Talk:Otto Pollak

message: Note: the only pages that currently link here are two redirects, both alternative names for the book mentioned (Criminality of Women and The Criminality of Women). Neither of these pages are linked to by any other, making this an orphan! Someone link it! --Sam 19:24, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page has 1 reference and the link is broken.
____  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:4C4:C200:45F0:A17A:B876:B6CC:CAC8 (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the birth and death dates.  I obtained them from the Family History Library website.  StudierMalMarburg 21:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs
Talk:Hungarian Rhapsodies

message: Information at allmusic.com is leading me to believe that both C#m Rhapsodies have been called "#2".  I know there is sometimes confusing when you buy a CD as to which C#m Rhapsody you'll get.  Could a clarifying point be added to explain this?
The main clarifying point is whether it is piano or orchestral. 
allmusic.com
"When Liszt fashioned orchestral versions of six of the 19 Hungarian Rhapsodies for piano, he reordered them, thereby unintentionally creating some confusion that remains even today. As indicated in the headnote, this Rhapsody No. 2 for orchestra is a transcription of No. 12. But a note of caution must be given here: there have been several popular recordings that have revised Liszt's renumbering, returning the famous Rhapsody No. 2 (for piano) to its second position in the orchestral version." 
Jnavarra 20:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  #2 and #12 (aka "#2") 

message: These pieces heavily influences Brahms' Hungarian dances and Dvorak's Slavic dances.  I find the resemblance so close it might be worth mentioning.  Anyone else?  MotherFunctor 02:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The final section of the Hungarian Rhapsody No. 8 has the same material as the middle section of Brahms' Hungarian Dance No. 3 and a theme used in the Hungarian Rhapsody No. 12 is also used in Brahms' Hungarian Dance No. 15. Kostaki mou (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth mentioning? 

message: The references have been introduce now, so I believe it's safe to remove the notice at the top of the page.81.155.67.201 18:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References introduced 

message: Is anyone going to manetion anything about the lassu-friss alternation of slow and fast music or anything else that woud have to do directly with the form of these pieces in this section. There's damn little as it is. Jonyungk (talk) 05:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Form 

message: In the 1950's I read of an unpublished 20th rhapsody. It was said to be in a museum in Weimar. I do not know whether it survived World War II. Does anyone know about it? Scott Tillinghast, Houston TX (talk) 03:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  20th Hungarian rhapsody?
Talk:Liquid Tension Experiment

message: Both albums were written in a very short period of time... It took five days for LTE and something like ten days for LTE2, if I recall correctly. I've read this in the CD booklets (but lost both cases afterward...). Can someone confirm this ? --Zoury 14:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing period 

message: This article is decently written, but it needs to have a ton of citations added to it. Please help. Blackngold29 (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: When it says portnoys second pick for guitarists, it mentions someone who was in Kansas the link on the word leads to a post about the state. I'm certain theyre talking about the band Kansas. Someone fix this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.49.199 (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Kansas link 
Talk:Lark

message: I removed the collective nouns from Raven and Lark for two reasons. 
Firstly, even if correct, they do not apply to 'all Ravens and Larks, just Common Raven and Skylark. Secondly, these are made-up Victorian names that only appear on lists of collective nouns. As a birder of many years experience I have never heard either of these nouns actually used. 
jimfbleak 05:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Collective nouns

message: This could use work. The insects mentioned in the diet, were does it find them? Like in the foliage of trees, or bushes, or on tree branches, or in flight? Is it the same foraging method for all larks? Just out of curiosity. Cynops 23:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Was this a real dish, or just an expression like angels on the head of a pin?  It must have taken an awful lot of them to produce anything worth eating. And is it true that Mitterand requested them as his last meal? BrainyBabe (talk) 11:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larks' tongues 

message: usually 2 to 3 years  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.113.189.147 (talk) 20:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  life span of the lark
Talk:Archy and Mehitabel

message: I have redirected Archy and Mehitabel to this page, but perhaps they should be switched around, so the properly capitalised version holds the content, with this page being a redirect.  Didn't want to do this myself, as I don't know how it affects page history etc.  HappyDog 00:20, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: It's properly capitalized here, actually, but the redirect is a good idea. - Hephaestos 00:21, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't realise. :) HappyDog 01:25, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name of the article should probably remain as-is (without capitalization) because that's the proper name of the series of poems/editorials; however, just because archy can't reach the Shift key to type his name with a capital letter doesn't mean his name isn't capitalized.  Indeed, because the author capitalized Archy and Mehitabel when writing in his own persona, I say all instances of the names that aren't part of a title (or something else Archy himself would've "typed") should be capitalized. Jeff Silvers 00:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The name of the book is "archy and mehitabel."  The names of the characters are "Archy" and "Mehitabel." Carlo 20:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not interested in starting any battles, but elsewhere on the encyclopedia WP:MOSTM applies to naming of articles, meaning that the singer k.d. lang and the television series thirtysomething, for example, are capitalized in their respective articles. Robert K S (talk) 04:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization of Archy/Mehitabel? 

message: When did "Archy and Mehitabel" cease publication?  Thank you. Rissa, copy editor (talk) 01:20, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Issue? 

message: It seems odd that there is a lot about Archy and his activities, but nothing on the character of Mehitabel - I no longer have the books to hand, but didn’t she claim to be the reincarnation of Cleopatra? I’m sure there must be more… Jock123 (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mehitabel…
Talk:Universal dialectic

message: Why was this article "cut down by 50%?" The article is now a stub. Weird.
Because it was somewhat padded, and listed on Vfd. It may now survive.
Charles Matthews 09:41, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a couple of external links. Yes, they go to my sites, but these are the only sites I know of that deal with this concept. I also added links to materialism and monism, since I felt that linking only to idealism was inappropriate. The Universal Dialectic concept is not idealistic at all, it is actually much closer to materialism. But rather than remove the link to idealism, I thought it more fair to add the other links. Nat 08:02, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)

text: Check the IP on this user (User:Factchecker007). I am betting it is User:66.66.117.237, who has been vandalizing all pages related to me recently. The anonymous user at that IP is an individual who has a personal problem with me, and has been vandalizing other websites I own as well. --Nat 22:03, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: You know what? You're right. A previous version did explain the concept, but that portion was removed. I'll see if I can add a brief explanation. --Nat 22:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Geography of Papua New Guinea

message: I'm planning a complete rewrite of this page - turning the CIA data into readable prose, wikify, lots of expansion, finding useful images.  Time permitting, this should happen over the next few days.
-- Wantok 07:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: heh, saw the date and thought, HANGON, its not the 25th already! I guess you got distracted wantok, good to know someone has been contributing to the png articles for a year tho, is promising Aliasd 23:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete rewrite 

message: How long is the country of Papua New Guinea? Whenever I look it up, it gives me the length of the island it's on. 75.84.226.208 (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length
Talk:A4 paper size

message: I made a disambiguation page (as 69.37.79.216, whoops) for all of the alternate uses.  It was getting a bit polluted.  I think the paper size is probably the most common usage, so I've left this page here.  See WP:disambiguation - Plutor 23:53, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

message: The article says the United States doesn't use A4 as the stardard paper size, but 8.3 x 11.8 seems to be pretty universal here.  Is it just not 'official', or am I missing something?
:See Paper size: North American paper sizes and A4 paper in the United States. The most common US paper size is Letter (I think), which is 5.9 mm wider and 17.6 mm less tall. This might seem a small difference, but it causes problems when trying to scale documents, or when trying to fit e.g. A4 paper in a filing cabinet designed for Letter. Shinobu 01:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What size does the US use then?

message: "The A3, A4 and A5 are all similar to each other." That statement implies that the other A sizes are not similar to each other, whereas, of course, all A sizes are similar in the mathematical sense used here. Or am I missing something? Charivari 23:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nicely spotted! I'll change it immediately. Shinobu 09:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Similarity

message: A4 Tech is a computer [OEM] hardware maker and i've visited the A4 Tech's website, but there is little information on whre the company is based or where it was founded in. -Mardus 18:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I may have had a mouse by A4 Tech once. They're from China:  Feel free to start the redlinked article. Shinobu 16:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A4 Tech
Talk:Barbie

message: Regarding this 
"In 2020, Mattel sold $1.35 billion worth of Barbie dolls and accessories, and this was their best sales growth in two decades. This is an increase from the $950 million the brand sold during 2017." 
Can this be removed? The Bloomberg source cites Mattel's annual reports but I can't find where this is info is mentioned in those reports. Timur9008 (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Paper9oll What do you think? Timur9008 (talk) 13:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top (toy sales info) 

message: regarding this reversion: the state judiciary is incredibly relevant in the context of women’s history and at least two cast members (Ana Cruz Kayne and America Ferrera) of the 2023 film have publicly discussed the depiction of women in the judiciary in the Barbie franchise and its relationship to the Roe v. Wade and Dobbs v. Jackson decisions. in my view, this merits a mention at the minimum.
isadora of ibiza (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The WP:LEAD is a summary, it should not include things that are not discussed later on in the article.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: the doll of the judge is so important it requires a mention in the lede section

message: Ok I would like to up date the barbie BobqwertQWERT BOB (talk) 22:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 November 2023 

message: — Assignment last updated by Wobuaichifan (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu

message: Barbie is given as an example of "Just in Time" manufacturing in the book The Box by Marc Levinson in chapter 14. * MountVic127 (talk) 07:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just in Time
Talk:Chinese astrology

message: Some places on the page say "boar" and others say "Pig".  I was trying to reconcile why boar did not appear on the list of twelve.  I was wondering if there was a preferred English word or if there needs to be a dual entry in the tables and lists. --DeweyQ (talk) 20:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After Korea introduced the Chinese calendar to Japan in 7th century A.D., the Japanese people changed the name of the Pig constellation to the Boar. Lion's the Tiger (talk) 13:56, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pig (zodiac)|Pig]] or boar? 

message: Why do we have a mix of Greek and Roman gods listed under the category of "Greek 12 Gods"?  Ceres, Diana, and Vesta are the Roman names for Demeter, Artemis, and Hestia, respectively.  Of course, I see no references for the correlations in the first place, so I'm not sure if that piece should be fixed or just removed. AlpineFox (talk) 14:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greco-Roman Gods? 

message: hey  this article currently has 7 sources. I believe that's enough.CycoMa (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't say references. It says citations. Every paragraph should have a citation.  Skyerise (talk) 21:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  more sources? 

message: م 37.239.74.17 (talk) 07:54, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  شنو معنه برج صيني
Talk:Surat Thani province

message: While googleing for สาขาตำบลเกาะเต่า I came across this, which lists two additional King Amphoe with their geocode already, but without any Tambon.
20	กิ่งอำเภอท่าโรงช้าง	Tha Rong Chang	southwest of Phunphin district
21	กิ่งอำเภอบางสวรรค์	Bang Sawan    	west of Prasaeng district
I guess these are planned new districts - can anyone give details? andy 11:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To add to the confusion, อำเภอท่าโรงช้าง was an old name of Amphoe Phunphin. andy 11:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New King Amphoe?
Talk:Socialist Party

message: It's a mistake. Polish Socialist Party still exist. Party's webpage is www.socjalistyczna.pl  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.75.91.158 (talk) 15:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Polish Socialist Party

message: I have removed all the parties that were not name "Socialist Party" except for those which were "Country Socialist Party" or "Socialist Party of country". This is a disambiguation - C mon (talk) 08:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: This article uses capitalization of "socialist party" when this article doesn't pertain to a specific socialist party, but rather to them in general, hence "socialist party" is not a proper noun, hence shouldn't be capitalized. I'm not an expert in linguistics, per se, so if I'm wrong feel free to correct me. Fuse809 (contribs · email · talk · uploads) 15:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Socialist Party (disambiguation) § Requested move 11 March 2023.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Talk:Socialist Party (disambiguation)#Requested move 11 March 2023|Talk:Socialist Party (disambiguation) §&nbsp;Requested move 11 March 2023]]
Talk:Fierce Creatures

message: there is no section discussing the reception of the film. John Cleese regretted making it ? Wizzy…☎ 10:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: Marwood Zoo is possibly named after John Cleese second forename, Marwood.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:64:CF22:246:14C9:8C14:7C91:8708 (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 
Talk:The Settlers of Catan/game guide versus encyclopedia entry

message: * I still think that these articles now constitute a game guide, and belong at wikibooks:Game Guides, which still don't exist, as I can't seem to log into wikibooks.  An encyclopedia article should be about the game and it's significance, not a detailed analysis of how to play the game and strategies used to win..  Gentgeen 14:39, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't a Wikiproject Games yet, but it's been on the list of requested Wikiprojects for a while.  Perhaps now is the time to start this project so we have a clear understanding of what the community wants in a game article.  Gentgeen 06:58, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)

text: Yes, but everyone who has a copy of the set, doesn't necessarily have the rules in English and not everyone wants to download the S3D game.  I think this article is one of the best ones on Wikipedia and is an excellent model for other games to follow.  I also just want to add that I'm pretty sure it's the best-selling board game of the past decade.  That certainly warrants quite a large collections of Wikipedia articles like Chess.  --Chuck SMITH 12:13, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text:  This documentation explicitly covers disputes of interpretation that arise from the published rulebook, which is why it is not just a superfluous html copy of the rules.  Some disputes have even arisen from the manner in which the German rules were translated into English, despite Teuber's public statement that none of the rules were changed when the US Edition was published. ~ stardust 12:29, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)

text: I maintain once again that the various "Settlers of Catan, #### maps" articles can be merged into one.  Just shrink all of the images to thumbnails - as you have done for the main article - and include links to the full-size versions.  I'd say they're too large anyway, both in terms of pixels and kilobytes, for inclusion in articles.  See Wikipedia:Image use policy if you haven't done so already; it may contain some enlightenment. -Smack 02:47, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:List of political parties in India

message: Wow what the great reason for deleting sate names , Wikipedia not made for nice looking, if information is right and usefull then why to deleting everything by giving bullshit reasons. Maphumor (talk) 17:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  State governed name  

message: As of now there is no political position of Bahujan Samaj Party in Wikipedia. Can you please give any source of information regarding its political position as in List of political parties in India it is only national party having no written political position. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @XYZ 250706 @Chennai Super Kings Lover Without refs from independent sources, neither should be added. It's better to leave it blank. I have restored BSP ideologies at Bahujan Samaj Party which was removed. Dhruv edits (talk) 11:08, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  BSP 

message: We should think about another section in list of political parties in India related to significant former parties , which can be helpful for additional knowledge. Maphumor (talk) 08:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Add information about significant former parties that have dissolved or merged. 

message: 2,276 2409:408A:2E41:BDCB:DAF5:F226:ED46:A347 (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About total number of political party