lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tales from the Floating Vagabond

message: Could someone with the original rulebook quote the exact text of the little rule that says something like "The Bartender can change the rules at will to make the game funnier." ... if memory serves it was like the last/ultimate rule for the Bartender. This is for citation relevant to a discussion posting I made in WP:WIARM. Thanks. Low Sea (talk) 08:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was that rule again? 

message: In Chapter 8: Keeping the baloney rolling, the first paragraph reads as follows:
"This is a comedy game, so it´s important to keep things funny. Come on,you can do it. Just think about the things that make you laugh, and inject them into adventures."
A little bit further down the page, under "Dramatically Appropriate Times", it says:
"These are devices that allow the Bartender to pull the Patron´s fat out of the fire, or to deep fry them if he chooses. This is the rule covering timely rescues, clever resolutions, and general fun stuff. In other words: if it feels right, do it!"
Those were the only parts I could find which sounded similar to what you requested. My version of Tales seems to be a first edition copy though, it definitely has a few misprints in tables inside.
A reader from Germany, 09-04-2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.248.181 (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only thing like this I could find 

message: Ok, so on page 62, under subheading 5.15 Where You Come In, is the following paragraph:
"If you are a player, this is probably the universe setting for your adventures (or misadventures). On the other hand, if you are the Bartender, then you come up with the creativity to take what's here and make it work. In other words, to make your own universe. The information in this chapter is only made to be a bunch of simple guidelines to help you out. If you, as the Bartender, want to chuck it all and start from scratch, that's up to you. We can't stop you." 
Sorry it took me so long to respond, I just got my copy back. 2001:1998:3500:4A:0:0:0:47A (talk) 06:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found What You Were Looking For
Talk:Roman Superhighway

message: I've been trying to edit this page's contents but somehow someone keeps insisting on the obviously wrong facts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.163.208.50 (talk) 03:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong facts

message: I just want to dispute this stated article. I live in Pampanga and I know that
there is a Roman Super Highway, but I never knew that it was a tollroad I just
went there last month and in its current state I don't think it can be considered
an expressway. Due to the following reasons.
1. It is not managed by the Tollways Management Corporation
2. There are no 8 lanes of traffic. There are only two
3. It is not in a condition which can be categorized as an expressway, it is even
in a state worse than roads in far flung provinces
4. There are no exit and entry ramps
5. there are no toll plazas.
And kindly give us sources of the said articles you didn't put links to your sources
I even checked out the tollways management Corporation site.
This article mis-leads a lot of people.
I think this article should require a clean-up. But as far as I know, this road was constructed by the Marcos Government to served as a dedicated expressway to the Bataan Economic Zone. But soon after it was built people then started to build houses and establishments on its side, thus destroying its real purposeAkosikupal (talk) 07:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since we got the Philippine highway network that has a route numbers assigned by DPWH, I prove that it is not an expressway at all, since the highway is assigned as just the national highway—being numbered N301. Dingo1234555 (talk) 19:44, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I already moved the page to Roman Superhighway to prevent confusions. I also did some cleanups regarding the intersections (or the so-called "exits") but it needs MORE revisions and clarifications. --hueman1 (talk) 08:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispution regarding it's an expressway
Talk:Trafikmagasinet

message: All this need sources.  I'm going to delete a bunch of stuff, and leave it out until you find some reliable sources for it.  --Rocksanddirt 18:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually not much needed deleting, and it might be just as well to leave the negative stuff out of the lead.  --Rocksanddirt 18:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegations of illegal activity 
Talk:Anthurium psilostachyum

message: Is this species of plant really notable enough to have its own article in this encyclopedia? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tree of life, and perhaps this better belongs on the page dedicated to the genus or family. 76.99.249.56 (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Zwaanendael Museum

message: Commons has a picture of the former town hall of Hoorn (built in 1613, see :Image:Hoorn - Statenpoort - detail.jpg); the front of the Zwaanendael Museum indeed looks a lot like that. - Erik Baas (talk) 01:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Stuck this in the infobox I just created.  It's not centered though so let's call this a work in progress. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Biblical languages

message: This is not the original bible language. The original language can be see in a movie Stargate "the Asgard race" Most of the article in the internet are propaganda base. If you be able to translate the original text of the bible you will find, that bible you hold in your hands has been written to someone agenda. The bible that you have at home is not bad, but is not true. We all looking for a truth we all wants to know the truth. My advice to you trust nothing on the internet and specially on the TV. Do your own research, learn, study become real intelligent being refuse living in someone else reality  It is time to thing without someone to tell you what to thing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xlameee (talk • contribs) 22:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Venetus A

message: An editor of Euphorion of Chalcis identifies this MS as belonging to the Empress Eudocia (concievably transcribed from such). Which Eudocia?
Erbse notes that the Venetian MSS have new shelf numbers; I have adjusted. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Car Wars The Card Game

message: User:Leitmotiv, do you have any sources to improve this article? 8.37.179.254 (talk) 20:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have to look when I get a spare moment in couple weeks, if you want to remind me. Right now, I'm neck deep in a guidebook editing/layout job that is due for print in a day. Leitmotiv (talk) 21:40, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Leitmotiv, how's it going? 8.37.179.254 (talk) 20:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at all my hard copy sources and found no mention of the game, so I have nothing to add. Though this website maybe have a smidgen of stuff that can be referenced. Leitmotiv (talk) 23:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Harry Lorraine (American actor)

message: I have attempted to correct the information in this article, but my edits were reverted. It currently conflates three people in the entertainment industry who used the name Harry Lorraine - an American film actor, an English film actor, and an American booking agent for vaudeville performers (but who did not perform). The birth information is for the English actor, the filmography is for the American actor, and the death information is for the booking agent. I have created a brief article for the booking agent, under his real name, Harry Wolff.
See http://www.felbridge.org.uk/index.php/publications/harry-lorraine/ and http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9F01E7D6153FE53ABC4A51DFBE66838F629EDE (or http://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1934/08/22/93639043.html?pageNumber=17).
Information at IMdb mirrors this Wikipedia article, but is incorrect.
Ira Leviton (talk) 22:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Capriotti's

message: Hello,
I recently removed some material that sounded more like an ad than an NPOV encyclopedia article.  I ask my fellow editors to review and act accordingly.  Thanks.  Mr. Swordfish (talk) 01:42, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  marketing puffery
Talk:Deer Park Tavern

message: Should the Deer Park really be categorized in Hotels in Delaware?  Although it was a hotel, it's not now.  GoingBatty (talk) 01:42, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotels in Delaware
Talk:2007 Florida Atlantic Owls football team

message: FAU and Troy are co-champions. This is because both schools have 6-1 records even though FAU beat Troy. So the claim that FAU might hold the trophy (I haven't seen anything verifying this) doesn't matter, the records speak for themselves. Also, the published accounts I have read so far all say this is a co-championship. KnightLago 05:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Co-Champs
Talk:The Adventures of Blinky Bill

message: This page is definite need of orderly priorities to make it more convenient for readers. Summaries should be a minmum of three lines and a maximum of four lines in a sentence. Grossly oversized summaries have bloated the space size of the article to over 115,000 bytes. Also should the lyrics paragraph be deleted or kept? 
Deltasim (talk) 09:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making the article orderly 

message: Not much edits have been made on this article lately. I am typing in series 3 summaries right now  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.114.71 (talk) 14:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits on this Article

message: I missed todays episode on ABC2 today "Blinky Bill Remembers Nutsy's birthday". Whoever has seen it today needs to type in it's summary. If you've seen it let me know. 
Sincerely User:122.109.122.167  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.127.189 (talk) 10:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Help Please!

message: Characters and Episodes have their own article now. Should Blinky Bill's White Christmas also have it's own article. --Mr. Curious Man 21:57  —Preceding undated comment added 20:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not unless there is enough to say about it and it has sufficient notability. Just a paragraph or two? Just "a movie/TV special ep"? No need to fragment the information on this main topic solely for structure sake (again see WP:AVOIDSPLIT). Would wind up deleted at WP:AFD anyway. DMacks (talk) 13:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Own Article
Talk:Killer Bunnies and the Quest for the Magic Carrot

message: I was just wondering why a picture hasn't been added to this page yet? I tried to find the answer to this on Wikipedia's FAQ, but I'm still not sure ... Could I, for example, take a picture of my own "Killer Bunnies" box and then add it to the main article? Just wondering.--Vico (talk) 23:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of "Killer Bunnies" 

message: Why does this article site no references? 
AlexBriggs13 (talk) 16:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No References?! 

message: When was the first game released? Was it translated to other languages?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.131.167.100 (talk) 06:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No history?
File talk:Pandas and ppl.jpg

message: Sheesh. Now we have tags on the rationale for verifiable claims. I am well and truly fed up at this point. You clowns won't be satisfied until you have a full article in place. This is not an article. It is an explanation of the purpose to which the image is to be used. The sheer bloody minded determination to put endless hoops and obstacles in the way of all non-free content seems to be aimed at wearing down the opposition by exhaustion.
For my part, it has worked. I give up. You win. I'm NOT going to write a whole bloody referenced article here. I could; nothing here is particularly surprising. But I have better things to do. I am positive that sixteen other excuses would pop up in any case. You want my advice? Leave the rationale alone. It's a rationale. It's the reasons being given for use of the image in the article. It's not an article itself. If you insist on leaving these absurd tags in place, feel free. I am through with beating my head against a brick wall on this.
Actually, I think this is whole thing is symptomatic of a larger wikipedia problem. The notion of "anyone can edit" is a great idea, and it has allowed all kinds of genuinely useful information to come in to wikipedia. I don't want wikipedia to lose that. But there is a problem that arises when anyone pops in to start rewriting technical subjects where there's already been good input from people with real expertise on the subject at hand; or when a contentious subject — particular a minor one with low activity — just keeps shifting from POV to POV over the years as different editors come and go. I'd like to see wikipedia have some kind of review process in place so that general readers get to see a somewhat stable version of the article by default, with the latest version always available as an option. I think Wikipedia:Flagged revisions is a step in the right direction.
Determination to make some kind of principled stand on non-free content is eroding the quality of information here; but there are so many other more serious problems with the quality of information that I am just giving up on this image stupidity.
Excuse my frustration. I am sure you are working in good faith for what you think is the good of the project. I'm not meaning this as a personal attack on other editors. But it is an expression of my own frustration and irritation over the way this image thing has been pursued. —Duae Quartunciae (talk · cont) 02:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AAARGHH. Fed up again.
File talk:Darwin on Trial.jpg

message: Whether it's used in the article or not, it isn't ok to remove the fair use rationale.  That action strikes me as a  clear violation of fair use policy.  Guettarda 23:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, Guettarda. I've been following and participating in image policy debates for some time, and if a rationale does not comply with WP:NFCC, it would seem illogical to leave it there. I recently removed a non-free image of Saddam from the article about 2006. As it happened, the image was subsequently deleted, but at the time, it had a Fair Use rationale saying that it showed how easily Saddam sat on his throne! What I see happening here seems perfectly in keeping with image policy as interpreted by people like Jimbo or Mindspillage, whenever they weigh in on such issues. ElinorD (talk) 01:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See :Image:John Cleese.jpg for a precedent for closing the debate with "keep" for one article and "delete" for another. ElinorD (talk) 01:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of fair use rationale
Talk:Area code 302

message: From when, 2017?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.117.0.34 (talk) 14:12, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  At least 30 years?
Talk:Curd snack

message: Why is it named ‘curd snack’? In Russia it is called «sirok» (сырок) 176.99.222.197 (talk) 07:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: but since the 1990s the curd snacks have become more varied and also contain ingredients such as cookie bites, apricot, strawberry jam and boiled condensed milk. Not true, strawberry jam and boiled condensed milk existed before the 90s, and what appeared in the 90s became available only in the late 90s and early 00s 37.54.230.242 (talk) 18:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The mass production of curd snacks began in the 1950s in Soviet Union and they quickly gained popularity. Initially, they were flavoured with simple ingredients, such as vanilla, cocoa and raisins, but since the late 1990s the curd snacks have become more varied and also contain ingredients such as cookie bites, apricot, strawberry jam and boiled condensed milk. 37.54.230.242 (talk) 15:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Wikipedia talk:Template index/Merging and splitting

message: I see a lot of merging and splitting being done by editors who say they are being bold and just don't bother to flag the matter beforehand with a template.  How important is it to use these templates and discuss merges and splits before they actually happen? Johnfos (talk) 22:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: When should these templates be used?
Talk:Juju Chang

message: The intro to this is copied directly from the ABC website; i don't have the time to fix it myself but if someone could edit that would be great  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.164.87 (talk) 20:18, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Violation
Talk:Rifle range

message: What sources are required for the wind flag's section? The data there is what I have picked up myself in over 10 years of competitive shooting, mainly small bore. Is there any particular parts which require sources?
Whippen 21:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a challenge to your information, it's an attempt to improve the article per WP:VER. What is needed is a reliable third-party source who has written about wind flags. It doesn't have to be an online article. So a chapter in a benchrest shooting book, an article from a magazine, etc. It's just an overall attempt to make the article the best it can be. I appreciate your contributing the needed wind-flag info. I'd just like to finalize that section and tie a nice little bow on it. Then we need to do the same for all the other sections. If you don't have a useful source, just leave the cite tag for now and someone will provide it at some point. Arthur 21:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries - I saw "direct quotes and for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged" in the link to the citiation page, so wasn't sure what was going on. I'll see if I can dig up an article in one of my mags, and cite that. Whippen 22:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wind flags sources
Category talk:Bryophyte stubs

message: This category is rather large, but it could be cut down by making a stub category for the largest class in the division Bryophyta, Bryopsida. There could also be stub categories for smaller classes, such as the division Sphagnopsida. It could also be cut down by families, but I'm having a hard time deciding. Thoughts? Cryptic.rat (talk) 18:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New stub category: Bryopsida
Talk:George William Wood

message: Research from Palmer's Full Text Online: This only turned up two articles in The Times:
*Report of death (5 Oct 1843) - says reprinted from the Manchester Guardian and that GWW died the previous evening.
*Report of inquest (7 Oct 1843) - reports inquest held "Wednesday" at which GWW is reported to have died the previous day.
Wed was the 4th Oct in 1843. Unlikely that an evening death could be reported in the Guardian then reprinted in the next morning's Times (limited telegraphic service in 1843). Hence date of death must be 3rd Oct.
However, I will try to find Guardian report to get this exact. Cutler 19:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death
Talk:Desperados (TV series)

message: They are bad influences on young 'uns.
I have seen this television show twice and I have seen them wasting the charge in fire distinguishers and trying to kill a man by locking him in an enclosed room whilst spraying in said fire exstinguisher. Supersonicjim 16:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Evacuation (TV series)

message: Hello Evacuation is a very intresting series i have only seen one the first one with Natalie H and Natalie T and Luke and Richard and Laura ect but it was great so i wan't to know the times in NZ so i can watch more!!!!!!
(Natalie ,NZ )  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.5.248 (talk) 03:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have cleaned up this article, removing irrelevant content, grammatical/structural clumsiness and the positive overtone concerning the fact that Miss Young appeared in both series. I have also added Felix Chancellor-Burton's name back into the list.
If you wish to discuss my editing of this article, then feel free to drop me a note on my talk page.
Shadytheif20 (talk) 20:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-Up
Talk:Zephyranthes robusta

message: perhaps this information and photo etc could be incorporated with a page on the genus, there is no evidence to suggest that this is a hybrid of Z. candida.  Hybrids of Z. candida do not usually exhibit the size or color of the flowers.  Is Z. robustus an accepted taxon?Planttc 19:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 5 years late reply, heh, but no, it isn't.-- Obsidi♠n Soul 05:35, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Yahoo! Music

message: LAUNCH Media, LAUNCH magazine/CD-ROM, and the LAUNCHCast radio station should all be in a separate article about the LAUNCH company before it was acquired by Yahoo! and integrated into Y!Music.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launch and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAUNCH.
:While some of LAUNCH products were discontinued by Yahoo!, LAUNCHcast continues with the original brand name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.72.118.244 (talk) 05:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Article For LAUNCH 

message: Someone keeps adding external link spam to this article.  Original IP was 75.92.61.171, but now is 132.178.121.13.  Same link was added by both. --Eddroid (talk) 18:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link Spam 

message: The "History" and "Key Dates" sections should be merged. They make little sense as they are now, specially because if someone wants to see a "kind of" timeline of this service it has to jump between two sections, and still miss some things (see "Limits" section with info about something from 2010). - 195.23.92.1 (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and Key Dates
Talk:Baltimore City Public Schools

message: Desegregation of the Baltimore City Public School System needs to be wikified and verified. --NE2 17:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

message: On June 6, 2009, this article was tagged for copyright problems. Replication of text was verified, and the contributor was notified. The article was relisted under Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 June 14. Permission has not been forthcoming, nor has there been any effort to revise the material. Accordingly, it has been restored to the last verifiably clean before this text was pasted here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problems

message: http://www.baltimorecityschools.org/cms/lib/MD01001351/Centricity/Domain/137/PDF/MapSchoolsByNeighborhood_SY09_10.pdf
* http://www.webcitation.org/670CU7Yio
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: School map by neighborhood

message: The link supporting this only claims that per-student costs are second highest among the 100 largest school districts, not the approx. 15,000 total school districts in the country. Meesher (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Per-student cost
Talk:Prostitution in Switzerland

message: A page with this title was created in 2007 but deleted in 2008 due to multiple issues. A redirect was left to Prostitution in Europe, where a new section on the subject grew up. The section was proposed for WP:SPLIT in 2013 but nothing was done. Hence I have performed the split myself in 2016, creating the current article. Polly Tunnel (talk) 15:53, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: History of this page 2007-2016

message: Full text 41.81.74.246 (talk) 11:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantages and disadvantages of sex tourism in Switzerland