Talk:Economy of Vietnam

message: Point of view error or possible vandalism in "Agriculture and Industry" section. Someone wrote "They don't even have an economy." Somebody please take a look!
The vast majority of the text in this article was copied wholesale (and without any acknowledgement, I might add) from an external website. The main problem with it is that it reads like a column from an American investor's magazine, dealing with the Vietnamese economy in terms of what a foreign businessman needs to know, not in terms of how the economy itself actually works. The other problem is the article's obvious, overwhelming bias and POV. Take a look at this quote, for example:
:"Substantial reforms to create a sound banking system and privatize state-owned enterprises need to be speeded up."
It's not just POV, it's actually giving advice on what the Vietnamese government "should" do! The next time you copy some external article into Wikipedia, please proofread it first. I have made extensive edits to the article in order to NPOV it, but I couldn't solve the problem of the lack of information on the actual mechanisms of the Vietnamese economy.  Mihnea Tudoreanu 23:48, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Nationmaster, your external link, copies from Wikipedia. However, you are right, in that the text here was (although I haven't checked specifically, I can assume) copied from the CIA World Factbook. Adam Bishop 23:51, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See estimate by the International Monetary Fund with figures in millions of new Vietnamese Dong.
Year	Gross  Domestic Product	US Dollar Exchange
1980	5,713                  	0.20 New Dong (2.05 Old Dong)
1985	100,464                	6.69 New Dong (66.9 Old Dong)
1990	41,955,000             	6,482.54 Newer Dong?
I have a situation. The above IMF estimates are restrospectively adjusted for new Dong only. So, they don't show devaluation in 1985 when 10 old Dong was replaced by 1 new Dong. In 1985, $ purchased 66.9 Dong before devaluation and 6.69 Dong after devaluation. I have corrected the article to reflect the change like here. But I am not sure about the cause of sudden plunge in the late Eighties. Can anybody confirm if there was another devaluation then or was it just the result of market pressure of the same currency introduced in 1985. Also, please confirm if the present Dong was the one introduced in 1985? After 1990, there seems to be no problem. Anwar 23:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I replaced the table with a more comprehensive one from that IMF data. -- Beland 21:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dong dilemma

message: I have read they are self-sufficient oil someone who knows more please to fill in.
Yes that is true,and Vietnam exports a significant number of them.This is mentioned in the CIA World Book.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwaynydelights (talk • contribs) 15:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: oil?

message: Shouldn't it be mentioned that Vietnam has been named one of Next Eleven emerging economies of the world by Goldman Sachs?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.217.150.7 (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  N11 

message: Hello everyone, I am working for the International Trade Centre (ITC). I would like to propose the addition of an external link that could lead directly to the specific country’s trade data held by ITC. I would like you to consider this link under the WP:ELYES #3 prescriptions. Moreover, the reliability and the pertinence of this link can be supported by the following facts 
1) ITC is part of the United Nations
2) No registration is required
3) Trade data (imports/exports) are regularly updated
4) The link gives direct access to the trade database of the specific country
5) The addition of reliable trade data to the Economy section of the country could provide an appropriate contribution to the information therein contained. 
Thank you for your attention.Divoc (talk) 04:01, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITC external link on trade data 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Saigonskylines8.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Dr. Evers has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Evers has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Evers, Hans-Dieter & Benedikter, Simon, 2009. "Strategic Group Formation in the Mekong Delta - The Development of a Modern Hydraulic Society," MPRA Paper 13796, University Library of Munich, Germany.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Evers's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Tarp has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Tarp has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Philip Abbott & Finn Tarp, 2011. "Globalization Crises, Trade,and Development in Vietnam," Working Paper Series UNU-WIDER Working Paper W, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 11:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Tarp's comment on this article 

message: Orphaned article has been created. The topic of Vietnam's key economic regions look like they might belong here. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Northern Vietnam key economic region]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Economy of Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141106070648/http://www.tapchicongsan.org.vn/Home/kinh-te-thi-truong-XHCN/2012/19289/Xuat-nhap-khau-cua-Viet-Nam-nam-2012-ket-qua-va.aspx to http://www.tapchicongsan.org.vn/Home/kinh-te-thi-truong-XHCN/2012/19289/Xuat-nhap-khau-cua-Viet-Nam-nam-2012-ket-qua-va.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130527152141/http://www.aseansec.org/22255.htm to http://www.aseansec.org/22255.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150929174055/http://www.15thaseansummit-th.org/PDF/25-01_2.4outcome_AANZFTA.pdf to http://www.15thaseansummit-th.org/PDF/25-01_2.4outcome_AANZFTA.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Economy of Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130103142249/http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/sovereigns/ratings-list/en/us?sectorName=null&subSectorCode=&filter=V to http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/sovereigns/ratings-list/en/us?sectorName=null&subSectorCode=&filter=V
*Added  tag to http://vietnamtourism.gov.vn/items/22311
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081227005719/http://www.vse.org.vn/ to http://www.vse.org.vn/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have reverted some edits which incorrectly update data. There seem to be two problems. One is that new data has been placed, but the reference is not updated. A reference that describes data from 2015 doesn't support the addition of updated data claiming to be from a different year. A new reference, with the updated data included, must be provided. The other is that references are added which don't work. Changing the name of a reference tag anchor doesn't change the information contained in the linked reference. Changing a name from "gso2015" to "gso2016" doesn't change the information in the reference; it just makes an undefined reference tag error. Key information in an article like this must certainly be referenced. Since old, correctly referenced information is better than new information that can not be verified, I have again reverted the edits.
If any editor needs help with adding correct reference tags, I'm happy to help. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing updates 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The price control affirmation in the summary links to this article https://vietnamnet.vn/en/business/vietnam-enhances-rice-pork-price-stabilisation-623341.html which is not a policy of price control, it's a policy that stabilize prices but as a consequence of others things: Like mandatory stock.
Calling that price control would be saying that the U.S practicizes price control because there's a mandatory reserve money banks must have.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablogelo (talk • contribs) 15:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price Control 

message: [28] - does wikipedia even have precedence with this type of citation? Im perplexed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.175.220.255 (talk) 20:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  citing youtube polemicists? 

message: The "Data" subsection is entirely incorrect - it does not reflect the data in the cited IMF source at all, or any other reputable source (WorldBank, etc.) for that matter, and depicts Vietnam as having a far more advanced economy than it is suggested anywhere in the literature. This is possibly the result of vandalism, however there is a chance that someone writing Wikipedia articles in large quantities may have gotten confused and pasted in the incorrect chart. I am suggesting a complete removal of the Data section until more accurate figures are added in. Nozzyl (talk) 14:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entirely incorrect data 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: If we are to compare the two revisions, the revision with the properly referenced introduction and properly referenced new information should not be deleted. To delete that and revert to an older inferior model, deleting almost [10,779] of information, is lazy and counts as vandalism. 61.68.143.23 (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have an opinion about these changes, but you might consider explaining each of your proposed changes here with your rationale for each change. Edit warring is not the answer. It would also help if you registered an account and used edit summaries for each change. Using a high number of small edits, each with no summary, makes it more difficult for people to review them. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not revert to the older content