lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crivitz, Wisconsin

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crivitz%2C_Wisconsin&diff=301582456&oldid=301576571
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090710/ap_on_re_us/us_upside_down_flag
In this edit, police action alerted the world of this town.  I think it is worthy of inclusion as long as coverage of it is brief, in order not to overwhelm the article. User F203 (talk) 21:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  trivia or important point 

message: the begining part, at least, reads like something out of a brochure, and lacks any references, and any objectivity. references to a town's "atmosphere" probably should not be in there? 05:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewrite 
Talk:Nakayoshi

message: Based on Yahoo辞書 and the WWWJDIC (you'll have to look it up yourself on the later since it appears not to allow linking directly to search results), methinks "good friend" would be a better translation of なかよし here, no? Reki (talk) 14:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: First of all, the list is definitely incomplete and a bit unorganized. I think it would be better if we organized it by the author's (last) names, then list all of their works under Nakayoshi. Kiseki-chi (talk) 11:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hmm...
Talk:Lake Duluth

message: I haven't been paying attention to this article.
Early in this article's development the following passage was added: "The drawing on this page is accurate but uses the obsolete term, 'Valders'. Valders was replaced by the term 'Greatlakean' when stratigraphic problems forced Valders to be abandoned."
I have several concerns with it.
#the assertion is unreferenced;
#the assertion contradicts the article's current references;
#I don't understand this passage -- in particular I don't know what "stratigraphic problems" means in this context;
#I am worried that the assertion is "unencyclopedic".
The contributor who inserted this passage may be correct.  But this passage lapses from compliance with our policy on verifiability.  We don't aim for "truth".  We only aim for "verifiability".  Using our current references the term is "Valders".
FWIW I spent ten or fifteen minutes trying to see if I could find a reference that definitely said the term "Valders" had been superceded by "GreatLakean".  No joy.  
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 01:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''"Valders"''?  Or ''"Greatlakean"''? 
Talk:Junichi Sato

message: Given WP:ENGLISH and WP:MOS-JP, shouldn't this page be moved to Junichi Sato (or at least Jun'ichi Sato? —Quasirandom (talk) 19:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and done (again). -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: "総監督" (sō-kantoku) is translated as "Chief Director" in this article (and probaly in other anime-related articles), but it is not accurate. The role of sō-kantoku is to supervise the director, and sō-kantoku usually does not direct works directly. "General Director" or "Supervising Director" should be better translation. --KAWASAKI Hiroyuki (talk) 06:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sō-kantoku 

message: J. Sato is now staring a new robot mecha (!) series titled "Mortal Metal". That is more than a bit unusual, considering his background with girl superheroes, like Sailor Moon S1, Tutu, Kaleido Star, ARIA and Marin's Sea Story. Although I remember he said in some press interview 2 years ago wanting to try something different, like bad girl heroines. Maybe the less than stellar result of Croisee anime made him switch. 91.82.169.88 (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of place artifact
Talk:Communist Left of Spain

message: I don't see your point, Soman. This group only existed for a few years, its leadership was completely absorbed into the POUM, and you couldn't ever fill more than, let's say, three lines of info for the whole thing. I mean, besides saying that it was a group of the Left Opposition that joined one of the Right Opposition (which befits the first sentences of the POUM article), there is nothing which would be worth noting about it. Oh, and please don't revert my categorizing. Dahn 17:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lake Minong

message: This article contains at least one passage I am concerned lapses from WP:VER.
In this edit
the following passage was added: "The image on this page is obsolete. Lake Sheguiandah and Lake Minong were not merged. The former, a phase of the Lake Huron basin, occurred around 10,200 B.P., early in the Marquette phase advance, was lower than Minong, and the two were connected by an early version of the St. Marys River at Sault Ste. Marie."
That may be true.  But it is unreferenced.  Compliance with WP:VER requires us to avoid inserting assertions we believe are true, if we can't back them up with a citation to a WP:RS.  Compliance with WP:VER requires us to stick with what can be verified.
There is a lot less difficulty in establishing what is "verifiable", rather than what is "true".
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 02:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compliance with [[WP:VER]]... 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Glacial Lake Duluth - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Move has been carried out.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The following commentary about the article was found and removed from the article (placed by User:Geokev who has not edited since 2006):
The image on this page is obsolete.  Lake Sheguiandah and Lake Minong were not merged.  The former, a phase of the Lake Huron basin, occurred around 10,200 B.P., early in the Marquette phase advance, was lower than Minong, and the two were connected by an early version of the St. Marys River at Sault Ste. Marie.
--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Note in article
Talk:Jordan, Wisconsin

message: There are two coordinates for this town, and they are not similar.
The redirect to the other Jordan goes to the Town of Hull in another county, and those coordinates seem to match. If the name of Jordon is the priority, it's OK. If units of government are the priority, edits will be required. Topeka Sam (talk) 11:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates and redirect
Talk:Joest

message: This car was created by TWR, same as the original XJ-14, not by Joest as the current wording implies. Joest only raced it (and may well have modified it). I'll try and find a solid reference before changing the article, though. 4u1e 18:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Joest didn't create the WSC 95
Talk:Torrent shocking

message: Is this for real? I'm suspicious, and here are some reasons why.
1) This article was started in october 2005, and in the 6 months since its inception it has been edited once. It was started by an anonymous IP (User:66.188.77.109, and the only other editor was User:Cmdrjameson 1 month later, who just copyedited and didn't add anything new to the article. 
2) Googling "torrent shocking" turns up nothing. nada. This is problematic for 2 reasons. First, it implies that this term is not in common usage inonline forums, which seems to be the only place it would be in usage at all. second, the article makes certain claims that should be verifiable by a google search.
::*"Torrent "shockers" usually hide self executing programs inside a ZIP file, which will time-release a variety of incriminating or crippling effects on the user's system."
--should be able to find something about this on security webpages.
::*"Shock files have been rumored to collect data and send it back "home" to the copyright owner during this delay period."
--rumored by who?
::*"Underground anti-piracy groups that boost of torrent shocking claim to do it for purely ethical reasons."
--I haven't been able to find any evidence of anyone claiming to do this at all, less giving reasons for doing it. 
::*"Currently no anti-virus software (Norton, McAffee, etc) is able to scan for shock files."
--If this were going on, I highly doubt the antivirus gurus would let it slide. Even if the big companies didn't care, the free public antivirus programs would still work to fight this, and "shock" programs would still end up on virus lists anyway. 
Unless someone can find soem info on this soon, I will NOminate it for AfD on the grounds that it seems bunk. If there is any reason to think this could be going on though, I want this in the encyclopedia. Shaggorama 18:07, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:36th (Ulster) Division

message: the red hand of Ulster is the wrong way round, check the link at the bottom of article *The British Army in the Great War: The 36th (Ulster) Division
The British Army in the Great War: The 36th (Ulster) Division. Could some1 please change it?  05.39 July 1, 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.128.29.93 (talk) 04:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Royal Irish Rangers seems unequivocal. It should be a right hand - not a left hand - like the Counties of Northern Ireland. See also Red Hand of Ulster. I have turned it around. - Kittybrewster 22:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Divisional Symbol

message: The second section of this page is very poorly written and contains some enthusiastic but mistaken statements. I'll try to give it a bit of cleanup shortly, but it is, for instance, incorrect to say that the 36th did not receive training( BILLY ..... I meant the 36th as a unit was not formed of men, who were then trained to work together. It was formed of men who had already been trained and armed) It spent most of its time in France during 1915 training, either in small groups or as a whole (In July 1915 the Ulster Division moved to England to recieve its Artillery. Lord Kitchener inspected it on the 20th July at Seaford and in early Sep it moved to Bordon and Bramshott where it was declared ready for service). The British Army simply would not send troops into combat without training, especially by 1916, when they had been fighting in the trenches for some time and begun adapting and creating new trench warfare tactics. Winterbadger (talk) 00:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Needed

message: The ninth recipient of the VC appears to be Cecil Knox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Leonard_Knox).
See the headstone at https://www.flickr.com/photos/22325773@N02/15066407755
Robert Morrow served in the 1st Battalion RIF, which appears to have been in the 4th Division until 1917 (Morrow died in 1915). See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Irish_Fusiliers and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4th_Infantry_Division_(United_Kingdom)
Cathalwoods (talk) 06:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  VC Recipients
Talk:Herbert G. Lewin

message: http://www.presidentelect.org/e1988.html says it was F. Booth Dollarhyde (NC)? Шизомби 18:10, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1988 running mate
Talk:Millennium of Russia

message: The article says the original design called for a large bell. The pictures show a large globus cruciger instead. It that a typo, or was the design changed? AmateurEditor (talk) 22:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bell? 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
N58.521128, E31.275244
::DoneXantheTerra (talk) 05:09, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Dirac delta measure

message: The articles are obviously equivalent, and Dirac delta function is much more complete. I recognize that "function" is technically an incorrect term, but it is still extremely widely used, much more so than that "delta measure". I therefore propose that this article be merged into Dirac delta function. --Zvika 18:15, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Dirac delta function
Talk:Fair housing (United States)

message: There are too many elements distinct from the other aspects o the law.  Consider housing a s distinct need, and protected right.  Consider also the aspect of disability and accessibility compliance inherent in the Fair Housing Act that is totally distinct from the CRA.
There are also many aspects of fair housing that are not included in the Civil Rights Act of 1968, such as Section 504 disability issues, regulation of GSE's (Fannie, Freddie), state and local enforcement, nonprofits, age discrimination issues, testing issues, etc., etc.
The term "fair housing" itself is one that fair housing groups, both private and governmental, have long worked to make a household word.  Consider that placing "fair housing" under the CRA would create a disconnect between the growing awareness of "fair housing" and these articles.
OPPOSE the merge idea; just link. Jon 20:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I agree that "fair housing" is a term of art and cannot be encompassed within the Civil Rights Movement article.
--/nbdy241 03:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Merge 

message: Fair housing is a concept in non Unitd States legal codes and social thought and as such it would be inappropriate to merge it into a topic exclusively about a US law (or set of laws).
--/decepticon 11:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Oppose Merger 

message: I suggest that rather than merging "fair housing" and "open housing", there needs to be an article specifically on the "Fair Housing Act"; this article is probably the basic source for "Fair Housing Act" and could just be moved to that title.  Then another article on Housing discrimination in the United States would be needed which could talk about housing within the civil rights movement; the Fair Housing Act; the Shelley case & discriminatory covenants; enforcement; disability issues; etc.  I'm not sure whether this is really the "open housing" article or not. --lquilter 19:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: There is an error in the last paragraph of this article. It should read that the fair housing act DOES NOT apply to a landlord renting units from his primary residence to three or less families or individuals. This is generally known as Mrs. Murphy's Exception.(You might want to include that even though the FHA rules do not prohibit this landlord from discrimination, he/she still cannot run ads that are discriminatory.)RobbChadwick 15:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in last paragraph of this article 

message: I've added the section on Seattle as a case study, which is solidly cited. However, I'd say that the rest of this article is tremendously undercited (and rather bare bones). If someone wants to take on a "project", getting this article right would be a great one. - Jmabel | Talk 05:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is there a "case study" in an encyclopedia article? Robert K S (talk) 02:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Stickwitu

message: Is there any relationship between this song and Bob Marley's classic, No Woman, No Cry? The music sounds familliar to me... Abbott75 02:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:1996 Oakfield tornado outbreak

message: I moved "Oakfield Tornado" to "Oakfield tornado" to comply with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events). --Rosiestep (talk) 23:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed the name again, adding the year, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Severe weather/Tornado's naming convention. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Ralph Fox

message: NorthernFiddler (talk) 19:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

message: In all that follows I'm assuming good faith. Specifically, I'm wondering about the information about his wife and family (me), his activity in the world of Go, his life as a pianist, and his activity in Equal Housing in Princeton.
I don't know how to identify the date of the changes, what, why and by whom it was made. I'd appreciate any help you can give me in furthering my understanding these changes. (I don't remember the exact details of what was removed.)
I understand there may be Wikipedia policies that may be in effect, I just don't know what they would be.NorthernFiddler (talk) 19:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with "NorthernFiddler." Fox was proud of his non-mathematical accomplishments, and they merit inclusion. -- Ken Perko 24.44.63.50 (talk) 19:46, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Can someone tell me why some personal information about Ralph Fox mathematician was removed?
Talk:Barry Burton

message: Okay, so we got a dispute here. On an early edit, somebody said a guy by the name of Gregory Malcom Adams portrayed Barry. However, recent edits on that article as well as this article point it to Barry Gjerde, and that there is nobody by the name of "Gregory Malcom Adams" who worked on this game.
It's either one, the other or both. I'm leaning towards both: Maybe Gjerde did his voice (judging how Gjerde is a voice actor/narrator), and Adams did the live-action scenes. Could somebody verify what is correct so I can adjust things accordingly? Because if this is true that there is no "Gregory Malcom Adams", I'll nominate that article for Speedy Deletion.-TonicBH 15:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is NO Gregory Malcom Adams.  Barry Gjerde acted in the live action scenes AND voiced Barry in the game.  Go to his official site.  Look at the photos.  Its the same guy.  This "Gregory Malcom Adams" nonsense was started by a member of the Gamefaqs forums whos since been banned.  Strange that the creation of "Gregory Malcom Adams" article is attributed to yourself, TonicBH. Parjay 19:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Right, because somebody put in the original article the "Gregory Adams" fiasco, and I thought it was truth without checking sources. My mistake. -TonicBH 21:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problem, these things happen.Parjay 21:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Portrayal in original Resident Evil

message: I think it would be much better to use this picture as his portrait.
http://www.capcom-central.com/concept/rem/BarryBurton.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.206.252.209 (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new better image. 

message: Thank you.PeterMan844 (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Please make a character table!
Category talk:Science fiction book series

message: Should this category be renamed to :Category:Science fiction book series to eliminate possible confusion? MakeRocketGoNow 18:25, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: Should this category be named Category:Science fiction novel series? I can't tell if this category contains only novels or just books in general (i.e. non-fictional works). Mr. Absurd (talk) 19:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello again! I think we need both, don't you? Short stories, comic books etc are books but not novels. I've looked around but so far haven't found any evidence that the category you suggest has ever existed & been deleted in the past. Go for it! - Fayenatic (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Went here to ask about just that as well. If anything falls off (non-fiction books; comic books or whatever) there should probably be some new categories. If there are no objections I might move this cat in the next few days or so. --Fixuture (talk) 17:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?
Talk:Somkid Jatusripitak

message: *An anonymous editor changed the status of the article from Asian Political Stub to No Stub.  I'd say that this article is still a stub - I and I alone have done all the editing in it, and it is still full of holes.  Any comments?Patiwat 21:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of the Article
Talk:Vermont Route 289

message: I just wrote this, and there is lot to do still, which I will either do later today (when I'm not at work) or if someone else gets to it before then, fine by me! :-D
*Categorization
*Infoboxes - Vermont doesn't have one yet. I'll probably work on that next.
*General Expansion
*REFERENCES - I have those right here.
I hope it's OK though! --Raj Fra 18:33, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brand New

message: The lines in gray have those alignments even begun construction yet. Do we have reliable source say when it will start construction and is it accept. Per WP:ELG any junctions has not yet reach construction phase does not belong on the Exit list. This needs a relialbe source or we have to remove all the jcts with gray background.--Freewayguy (Webmail) 01:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose interchange
Talk:Mauveine

message: It seems that mauve aniline and violine were/are other common names for the dye. (Dictionary.com covers lists them as meaning the same thing). However, this 1861 article refers to violine and aniline purple as distinct, I'd guess similar but produced through different means and with somewhat different properties. Not knowing more details of the different meanings, or commonality of usage, I don't want to add something to the article that might be wrong, but thought I'd mention the terms here in case someone else knows or wants to find out more about the terms, to integrate into the article. -Agyle 22:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other synonyms: mauve aniline, violine 

message: This should go into a chembox, not the article body--Bfesser (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  InChI 

message: This article is extremely similar to the page titled, "Aniline Purple." They should be put into one article, with an introduction including something along the lines of, "Mauveine, otherwise known as aniline purple and Perkin's mauvine..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.189.139 (talk) 02:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Aniline Purple? 

message: According to this article, Queen Victoria appeared at the Great Exhibition wearing clothes dyed with Mauveine five years before it was invented...  Paul S (talk) 11:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I was reluctant to remove the reference myself as I know so little about this subject. Paul S (talk) 17:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the-? 

message: The coordinates of the dyeworks at Greenford are  --Redrose64 (talk) 00:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dyeworks 

message: The photograph of Rees in a bowtie says it was dyed with the "original sample of mauveine". It is possible that Perkin stored a sample from 1856. But if that is the case I think a reference is needed. More likely, the word "original" is intended to mean something else. Humpster (talk) 02:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible misleading caption
Talk:List of BirdLife International national partner organisations

message: Looks a mess at the moment but stick with it while I edit it and I'll have this sorted out! SP-KP 18:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the L in "Birdlife" be capitalized? --Anonymous, 21:43, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: done --Kuhni74 (talk) 11:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The Belarusian BirdLife partner APB is being closed down due to a Belarusian court decision: https://www.birdlife.org/news/2022/03/19/apb-birdlife-belarus-shut-down-after-24-years-of-activity/ --Kuhni74 (talk) 15:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  APB (Belarus) closed