lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pluralism

message: Need to redirect all the "what links here" to the appropriate article. Madmedea 16:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved it here:
"Robert Stecker, "Art Interpretation", Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (1994), pp. 193"
Thanks, Drum guy (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference for [[Critical pluralism]]

message: I've noticed that the term "anti-pluralism" has been used by certain philosophical or polemical writers. Perhaps it could deserve a stub, along with appropriate sources of course.     ADM (talk) 12:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-pluralism

message: Hyperpluralism should not redirect here, it deserves its own page. 173.66.29.100 (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As soon as someone writes an article on it, we will link it! See Hyperpluralism - history for previous content (from 2005. single sentence). See also wikt:hyperpluralism. -- Quiddity (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyperpluralism
Talk:United World College of Costa Rica

message: In 1996 Helmut Kutin, President of SOS Children's Villages, proposed the foundation of an International SOS College in Latin America similar to the African one already established in Ghana. 
The idea was to create a space of academic excellence for students from different SOS villages in Latin America. 
This dream became a reality on January 14th, 2000, the day Colegio International SOS Hermann Gmeiner was inaugurated in Costa Rica. 
Costa Rica was chosen as the place to construct the college because of its characteristics as a democratic and peaceful country with a high level of education in Latin America. Also taken into account was the fact that the SOS Villages Regional Office for Central America and Mexico is located in Costa Rica. 
The Grieg foundation generously financed the transition from SOS to UWC, committing itself to provide one hundred full scholarships during the first five years of existence of the United World College Costa Rica, this being a very important source of financial support for the school. In addition to providing funds for the construction of the current college Per Grieg has also committed himself to offer scholarships for future students from SOS Villages. 
In August 2006 the college formally joins the United World Colleges Organisation and from that moment on will be known by the name United World College Costa Rica. 
Our goal is to educate young people with strong ethical and moral beliefs, as nature and environmental conservationists as well as defenders of peace in a natural and friendly environment.
Copied for merging reasons Magioladitis 11:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text from [[United World Colleges Costa Rica]] 
Talk:Sir William Stanier School

message: #Stub needs to be massively expanded.
#Photos need to be added.
#Infobox needs to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 19:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:Treaty of Saint Petersburg

message: Wasn't there another, earlier "Treaty of St. Petersburg", one about international arms control (namely the explosive projectiles which weighed less than 400 grammes were banned from use against people in war). I think that was in 1866 or 1869. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.70.32.136 (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All the treaties I know or found are added. If you find others, please add them. :) Sijo Ripa 22:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found. :) Sijo Ripa 22:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:LGBT rights in Colombia

message: This article with socail cleansing at its head, based on an article of 1980 and amnother of 1992 IS NOT BALANCED OR FAIR!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juanholanda (talk • contribs) 22:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It was finally signed, it should be included in the Main Chart.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.30.101.26 (talk) 05:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2011 Antidiscrimination Law
Talk:Újpest (disambiguation)

message: Do we really need this disamb page? Yes, I know, that the Újpest FC is often shortend to Újpest, but I think a link to the club in the district's article is well enough. --Hu:Totya (talk!) 13:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've deleted the PROD noticed as I wish to contest it. A search for Újpest in the Search WP box throws up about half-a-dozen pages, some of which could legitimately be added here (I've put one in to be going on with) Thoughts? Swanny18 (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts are ... You have added an entry which is not the exact phrase "Újpest" and which is about a group of sports teams, from Újpest, the constituent members of which have entries on the page Újpest. The dab page remains an orphan and serves no useful purpose. In my opinion, without a comprehensive list rather than "one to be going on with" it now actively impedes search by attracting users who might otherwise continue to use the Search function.  I stand by my original research and PROD designation (previously endorsed by another user User:Narky Blert) but this would now have to go to AfD. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have moved the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC into a standalone lead per MOS:DABORDER. I agree that any further discussion should be through WP:AFD. Narky Blert (talk) 10:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair enough: I'm never sure, myself, whether dab pages should broadly list all similar titles, to aid the search process, or narrowly contain only those with the exact same spelling. As for the difference between "Újpest" and "Újpesti", I don't know Hungarian but I surmised that it was just a grammatical variation (like including or omitting a definite article, for example). I do know "Újpesti TE" has its own dab page, so would probably warrant a See Also mention here at least. The other items that came up, which I thought might go here (broadly speaking!) were: Újpest FC II (a 2nd Division side), Ujpest Dosza (maybe; it's a redirect to the FC page), Újpest Synagogue, Újpest–Városkapu (Budapest Metro), Ujpest-Kozpont (another Metro station), Újpesti Törekvés SE and Újpesti MTE, a couple more football clubs. Anyway, it's up to yous, Swanny18 (talk) 11:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD
Talk:Meg Rosoff

message: in the footer provides links to some library catalog data.
Beside the Carnegie Medal citation (book and author blurbs) that is now referenced in the article [ref name=medal2007], contemporary press releases are available online.
* [ref name=prdir2007] "Releases for 2007 Awards". Press Desk. CILIP. Retrieved 2012-07-30.[/ref] 
Two releases 21 June 2007 feature Rosoff and Just in Case. Two earlier releases 20 April 2007 may be useful, "Shortlist ... announced" and "... Judges comments on the shortlist".
--P64 (talk) 00:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Seediq language

message: The article says Truku is another word for the Seediq language... but why is there a separate article for Truku then? --Unsound 14:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 很好 then :) --Unsound 14:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since they are both stubs, we may as well merge them together, don't you all think so?--Jerry 18:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seediq vs. Truku
Talk:1989 IBF World Championships

message: The InternationalBadminton.org page about the 1989 IBF World Championships  is wrong. It can be verified, opening the draws in semifinal, for example, ; or in the Danish site . MontanNito 14:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bronze mixed doubles medal mistake
Talk:Kevin Thompson (pastor)

message: Does this guy really rate his own article? I don't think we want to start filling Wikipedia with the bios of criminals unless they are truly noteworthy. This guy wasn't. --Bookworm857158367 14:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrary section header 

message: Been busy. I respect Hydriotaphia for great dedication to accuracy, and a willingness to tackle some daunting tasks, such as the fine details of Federal legislation. In this case, if I'm not mistaken, the Lacey Act and its 1994 revisions.
What I've done is, contact several attorneys familiar with the Thompson case. 
In point of fact, the Federal Lacey Act is enabled by State law(s). Prior to January 1994, it was legal to catch leopard sharks of any size, in California coastal waters. Since 1994, only those smaller than 36 inches in length are illegal to catch. 
Therefore, my addition to the article, stating, "initially this activity was legal," is correct and appropriate. 
Also, in this same context,  the phrase "enlisted in a conspiracy" is not correct. Something like, "recruited for a project" would be more accurate. 
Only later did it become an illegal conspiracy, though (on the face of it) one mild enough to escape official attention for a dozen years, even though their juvenile sharks were on open retail sale to the public. 
Rather than get into a literary Page Ping-pong match, I'm placing my findings here, before doing anything else.
Ah yes, and the Verification. 
http://www.cuebon.com/Indictment.html
http://www.cuebon.com/Indictment.pdf
These are scans of the Thompson indictment itself, and of the two key applicable laws. These are all in the Public Record, so anyone can find their own copies, if they wish.
Cuebon 02:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected as many of the links as possible. Hydriotaphia (talk) 23:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Prohibitions of the Lacey Act
Talk:Heavy (House)

message: House mention that he both sees blue and green eyes on the pictures. That would be slightly more unlike (If one parent has a dominant brown and recessive blue allele, and the other has a dominant brown and recessive green allele, chance are the kids would have brown (at least one brown allele present) or green (green allele dominates, blue is recessive). But not blue (which would have required two blue genes).
That's the model on which - I think - the writers based their reasoning. Of course, House could as well also be telling a lie just to force her confess.
In reality the genetics behind eye colour are slightly more subtle (The wikipedia article cites at least 3 genes). And the children could have some grey eye colour that would look both greenish and blueish depending on the individuals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrYak (talk • contribs) 03:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More eye colors
Talk:Mike Ashley (businessman)

message: Mike Ashley born Walsall or burnham, Buckinghamshire. Please correct to burnham, not Walsall 188.31.144.28 (talk) 09:44, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2021 

message: How could he start it at age 18 in 1982 if he was born in 1958 which would make him 23 or 24 in 1982 depending on the month? 2A02:C7F:8F3B:E700:9D3B:4DF1:E179:487 (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He was born in 1964 not 1958. Govvy (talk) 10:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry about that - my bad SpookyTwenty (talk) 13:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Age
Talk:Birmingham pub bombings

message: The article is not clear that this was an IRA bombing. Shouldn't it be clear? 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-29936619
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/birmingham-pub-bombings-ex-ira-chief-8252395
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-47670167
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/apr/05/birmingham-pub-bombings-the-victims
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2019/03/22/news/fatal-birmingham-pub-bombings-accidental-says-ex-ira-chief-1579667/ Flexdream (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you read the article? It's perfectly clear that the IRA was responsible. Down to referenced statements that the IRA Army Council, the Birmingham Six, and senior members of the British establishment know the identities of the perpetrators; that two of them are dead; that two more have immunity from prosecution; and that one has no such immunity (apparently). Also, inclusion in the infobox and the fact it's mentioned in the lead that a member confessed. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks @Bastun, the inclusion in the infobox of the perpetrator is recent, and may yet be removed. In the lead the IRA denial is prominent. I also think that describing the IRA's 'involvement'in the murders is muted. I suppose Putin is 'involved' in the invasion of the Ukraine according to some? The second sentence of the second paragraph is pure pleading and greenwash. Flexdream (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Responsibility
Talk:Hunter Island (Bronx)

message: The article title is given as Hunters Island, New York but throughout the article it is refered to as Hunter Island. Is the article title correct (with an 's') or is the text correct (without an 's')?  -- Keith D 14:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The USCG charts call it "Hunter Island" .  I would call that a pretty authoritative source.  -- RoySmith (talk) 16:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title Problem
Talk:Palestinian culture

message: Information from this article should be incorporated into the Palestinian people article. This follows the standard set by other articles wherein people and their culture are described together. I will begin moving in sourced sections into the main article. Those who feel that this article should stand alone and encouraged to make the case for why. Tiamut 13:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that is a good idea, as it is already quite long. TewfikTalk 06:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already been done in more concise format, and has met with the agreement of people at the Palestinian people page. As such, I'll just put a redirect to that page in the place of the present material, most of which is covered in more detail in the main articles that link to each subject anyway. Tiamat 17:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:Milk Hill

message: Note: this previously had an invalid grid reference -- B3087 is not a valid OSGB grid reference (and whilst it might possibly be a valid OSNI grid reference, Wiltshire is not in Ireland). -- Karada 09:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! --Stemonitis 15:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Repertoire

message: There has been discussion of merging this word with repertory.
It seems to me that the two things are quite different.
Repertoire is a bodyor collection of work, a noun.
Repertory is an adjective referring to the behaviour of certain theatre companies.  Seems to me there that putting them together simply encourages people to use them interchangably in a way that is quite wrong (already quite common IMHO).
Marcus
209.59.66.230 14:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, they are quite different. Repertoire (theatre) shouldn't redirect to Repertory -- SteveCrook (talk) 12:17, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Austrominius modestus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 23:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Minworth

message: I note with some amusement the writer of this article has gone to great lengths to avoid mentioning the Sewage Treatment Works, despite these being seemingly one of the largest sites in Minworth, instead mentioning frankly irrelevant aspects of the town such as motorcycle repair shops.  I can't think why this might be!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.208.240 (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Old Hill

message: :There used to be a market, but this has since shut down and remains empty.
We need to know when it shut down, as well as when the line thinks is now (so "as of September 2007" would be fine). Loganberry (Talk) 14:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates needed 

message: I have done a quick restructuring to put headings to the various topics in the text.  But I don't have time to re-write the main body of this article.  However, I may get around to including some photos as I have a few Old Hill landmarks in mind.
I also corrected the co-ordinates to close to Holy Trinity Parish Church, as I get annoyed when things do not appear in the right place on MultiMap.  --  Robert of Ramsor (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring 

message: The following paragraph may or may not be factual, however there are no sources cited. Parts read as though they are the author's own recollections and views and as such don't belong in this Wikipedia article.
In the 1940s and 1950s the High Street was very different and contained some desirable shops typical of many main streets in the Black Country at that time. Thomas' Butchers and slaughterhouse was next door to the Grand. It was a family business as most shops were and old Mrs Thomas worked tirelessly well into retirement age. Needhams was a small family grocers and was spotlessly clean. Old Guys sweetshop and tobacconist was a joy to visit. Old Mr Guy was a tiny man who stocked all the best sweets and sold ice cream cornets with chocolate sprinkles. The greengrocers on The Cross was called 'Timmies' and was completely open at the front like a market rather than a shop.
Unless supporting citations are provided this paragraph should be removed. Rupples (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  General facilities 

message: Lead describes Old Hill as a small village. Surely not. More like a small town or large village? Would "urban area" be a better description? Any views? Rupples (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "By 1934 there were 72 chain-works and chain-shops in Old Hill; almost a third of the total for Great Britain." That doesn't sound like a village. Maproom (talk) 08:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Many of the chain-shops were 'back garden' enterprises. 1934 isn't that relevant as we're attempting in the lead to state how Old Hill is described in reliable sources today. It's tricky because Sandwell Council sees the borough consisting of six towns, the one covering Old Hill being Rowley Regis, but I suppose their designation isn't the only source to take into account. Old Hill is joined with Cradley Heath as an electoral ward. Ordnance Survey describe Old Hill as a village:  Old Hill in the past did have greater importance because it was the administrative centre for Rowley Regis Urban District until 1966. Rupples (talk) 12:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village or town?
Talk:Tettenhall

message: I don't think the Dave Hill who plays guitar for Slade also writes for the Guardian. There is a Dave Hill who writes for the Guardian but I think he's based in London and not Wolverhampton.
Meltingpot (talk) 22:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Dave Hill

message: I have classified this article as a start. I have added some sources but more work needs to be done. I have removed some unverifiable material from the article. Capitalistroadster 21:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The West Midlands WikiProject currently doesn't classify articles. But thanks nonetheless! - Erebus555 10:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have upgraded this article to C-Class, though reading the quality scale on the WikiProject West Midlands page, it is bordering a B. Any thoughts? Æthelred (talk) 20:08, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification

message: This article portrays Tettenhall as a rural idyll near the city of Wolverhampton. It is a cosmopolitan suburb fully integrated into the city and not rural at all. Already one of the most desirable areas to live in the Black Country is it possible that Tettenhall's image is being 'bigged up' by this article? Stub Mandrel (talk) 12:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Bartley Green

message: The entire section about this 'Jinny' is unreferenced. Was it a result of a merge or deletion? - Erebus555 19:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a copyvio, from . Andy Mabbett 20:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jinny 
Talk:Michael Gordon (film director)

message: A note about this business: 'American actor, director, screenwriter, producer, and editor Joseph Gordon Levitt..'
C'mon, who hasn't heard of Joseph Gordon Levitt? I mean, you forgot a few things, he's a singer, and entrepreneur..and maybe we don't simply think of him as Tommy Solomon on the sitcom '3rd Rock from the Sun'. DanLanglois (talk) 20:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Chrysomya

message: Your article is very comprehensive and a great article!  Only a few suggestions for you! The references should go right after the punctuation, not before, and with no space in between.  Also, I'd check some of your grammar, I fixed a few comma errors as I saw them, but there are more comma errors  that could be fixed.  Also, I believe you meant 10-12 millimeters instead of centimeters on the description.  You need to spell out distance measurements (so an automated bot told me).  You might also want to change hours to days on the life cycle, because huge lists of days aren't as easy understood by the reader as days are.  But other than that, it looks great!  You have a lot of information and really included some of the species in depth.  Your summary on how to distinguish C. rufifaces and C. megacephala is great.  Should you want to add more, on our page Chrysomya bezziana, there are ways to distinguish ours from C. megacephala as well if you want to add more information to yours.  I would also check your links, you have C. bezziana linked a few times (when it only needs to be linked once), but I don't think C. rufifacies was ever linked.  Great job though!  Dachshundcrazy (talk) 00:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One suggestion on the description section: you might want to go in chronological order:eggs, larvae, pupa, adult. You should try to include some info on all stages of life cycle instead of just adult and larva, if information is available. (I liked that you gave specific examples on egg laying methods of specific species though!!!)
Great info on C. rufifacies!!!! [: 
I think the article is good, just little amounts of punctuation (which i went ahead and corrected, they were no big deal!)
Great job guys!!! Very useful info on Chrysomya!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmedina21 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions