Talk:Sex and the City

message: I tagged this as needing a citation, but then I looked into the history of the article and found that it was originally sourced to a tabloid before someone removed the citation, and then someone else added an irrelevant citation that had nothing to do with the content. The material is unsourced, and for years it was dubiously sourced to the Daily Mail; no one since 2010 has been able to locate a better source. So I have removed it. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious material sourced to the ''[[Daily Mail]]'' removed 

message: The article is relatively neutral, but some of the sources caught my attention.  Under the reception section, the author cites quotes and rankings from ABC News, Glamour magazine, etc. as examples of criticism towards the show.  It is difficult to see these sources as being "reliable" especially since their main genre is not necessarily literature.  For example, the author of the ABC character ranking article is not a true literary critic, so citing her ranking as an example of critical reception seems to be slightly inaccurate.  The bias is not noted within the Wikipedia article either.  However, the content of the Wikipedia article itself is all related to the main topic and nicely organized.  Hcw5 (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article critique Week 3 

message: It would be nice if it was specified that the versions of the show that are broadcast nowadays on cable television are heavily edited for time (a.k.a. censored). Many people who have never watched the show might not know that. They should be advised, since the changes severely affect the quality of the show.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.223.137.84 (talk) 04:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited Versions for Syndication TV  Broadcast 

message: Sorry, the show glorifies sexual activities and moral decay. I guess you can find many right-wing, conservative, christian voices who have a massive problem with this show. Why not giving them a voice in the article??
62.226.73.46 (talk) 23:55, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia includes coverage from independent reliable sources. If there is coverage from such sources that we don't include, one likely reason is that no one has added it. You are someone, IP editor. - SummerPhDv2.0 15:41, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism only from the left??? 

message: FYI, the Steve Brady article has recently been redirected here, after it was proposed for deletion. I can't say I was a fan of Sex and the City, but I know enough about it to know that Steve Brady is a notable character and probably does deserve his own page. But I also know that because the show is a bit older, sources may be more difficult to come by. If anyone in the future decides to attempt to restore the Steve Brady article (with reliable sources to show it established WP:GNG, not just primary sources like the article had before), I did a quick search for a couple sources that could get you started. There are more out there for anyone inclined to do some digging...
*'Sex and the City' Q&A: David Eigenberg
*Why we loved Sex and the City's Steve Brady
*Sex and the City’s Chris Noth, John Corbett, Jason Lewis and More: Where Are They Now?
*‘SATC’s’ David Eigenberg in Napa for Planned Parenthood fundraiser
*The Supporting Male Cast of 'Sex And The City'
Additionally, for anyone with a Newsbank or Lexis Nexis account, here are some offline sources you could access (if you need me to provide a copy of the full article in the future, message me):
*"Naperville mom of 'Sex and the City' star says, 'He's doing what he loves'" June 1, 2008 | Naperville Sun, The (includes 12 weeklies) (IL) Author: Paige Winfield | Page: 4 | Section: AROUND TOWN 
*"Acting his age; Area native hits his stride on hit HBO series"  June 27, 2001 | Naperville Sun, The (includes 12 weeklies) (IL) Author: Michael Kapellas | Page: 36 | Section: NEWS 
Thanks. — Hunter Kahn 15:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve Brady 

message: Most of the page is entirely uncited.
B637275 (talk) 22:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations sorely needed!