lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wallace Wolodarsky

message: This was a comedy. It was some sort of derivative of a UK series, The Royle Family, with its pun on "royal".
Is it a TV series pilot?
It starred Randy Quaid, but has 0 IMDb votes, implying it never aired??
Varlaam (talk) 19:30, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Kennedys''
Talk:Nebraska Cornhuskers football

message: Mickey Joseph is know 0-1 Papa smitty (talk) 18:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. MadGuy7023 (talk) 13:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Ttt 2601:347:4200:3720:11A:9750:B6A2:B25B (talk) 20:16, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 September 2022 

message: I was surprised this was still going on.  The scientific consensus is against balloon releases as they significantly harm the environment and wildlife. It is a violation of NPOV to not represent this discussion in the sources regarding their practices.  It has been discussed extensively in the sources about this specific subject, particularly in 2021:
:The damage to wildlife such as turtles, birds, and deer who mistake the balloons for food is why the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published a statement urging people to stop releasing balloons and also why numerous states, cities, and even countries have passed laws to ban and enforce penalties for balloons releases including Connecticut, Florida, Tennessee, and Virginia,” Woerner said. According to ASUN, UNL is the only Big Ten school along with the only university in the country that still does mass balloon releases. “The harm caused to the environment by this tradition and the impacts it has on our reputation as a University cannot be ignored any longer,” Skylar Hanson, Senior Human Resource Management major at UNL said. “There is clearly a growing consensus among students that it is time for us to part with this particular tradition,” Ivan Molina, Junior Political Science major at UNL said. 
The idea that this has anything to do with a helium shortage is a violation of NPOV and only represents one aspect of the practice. A bizarre 2011 article by the Daily Nebraskan strangely denied that the practice was environmentally harmful and weirdly claimed that the EPA wasn't concerned.  In reality, every relevant scientific body in the world has recommended against the practice. A 2012 study by Clemson students showed that the balloons had measurable impacts on the environment that were at odds with claims that they were safe, leading to them halting the practice in 2018. Two petitions were filed against the University of Nebraska, one around the time of the Clemson study and another in 2014, and in 2016, they were sued for continuing the balloon release.. The idea that this tradition ended because of a helium shortage is 100% unsupported and appears to be a whitewashing of all of the major opposition to balloon releases by the university over the last decade.  This needs to be fixed. Viriditas (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Balloon release
Talk:Sudas

message: I found a translation of the Rigveda that translates his name as Sudasa here. Is is possible that Sudas is the modern schwa-deleted rendering of the original Sudasa?  Chronikhiles (talk)  11:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that is unlikely to be the case give most sources differentiate the two, https://www.google.com/search?q=sud%C4%81s+sud%C4%81sa&sxsrf=APwXEdd64fBNc9x1IqYt-5Mig4GaxxCaZw:1683734500769&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjr0MHmj-v-AhXPMjQIHbtBAoYQ0pQJegQIBxAM&biw=1920&bih=929&dpr=1. Chariotrider555 (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sudas or Sudasa?
Talk:Bapatla Engineering College

message: The tone of this page smacks of copyvio but the school's website isn't available at the moment for checking. Cpastern 21:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's No copyright Violation. And for god's sake its not a 'school'. Its an Engineering Collage - Yes there's difference between the two in India. Dont go about deleting a lot of informaton you dont understand and know nothing about. Deleting large amounts of data is NOT an accepted policy at wikipedia.The schools website was available throughout even while you were posting this message. - Huntscorpio 19:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ecopolis (city)

message: I did some editing and added some extra information. I don’t know if Paul Downton was the first person to use the word ecopolis, but that’s the earliest source I could find. Personally I hadn’t heard the word until I read the New Scientist article; it was just google that led me to Downton. The NS article did talk about megacities but it didn’t specify a minimum size for an ecopolis, so I removed the reference to cities over 10 million. I added some info on Sociópolis in Valencia, which was mentioned in the NS editorial of the same issue. I wonder though if there are distinct differences between an ecopolis and an ecocity or sustainable city, enough to merit separate articles. Fionah 16:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is the city size that makes it distinct from an ecocity. As with many neologisms the etemology of the constiuent parts isnt really taken faithfully into account. "Polis" means city, but thanks to words like "metropolis" (mother-city), metro is assumed to mean city and polis to mean a big one. So perhaps its a flaw in the laguage, but I'm sure I found a mention of city size in its definition. Perhaps a merge with eco-city is in order with a mention of Ecopolis being the preferred term for larger versions. Robinoke 13:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reacted to the portmanteau description. I instinctively interpret it as "ecology" and "metropolis", where "eco" sounds similar to "metro" and brings up the immediate association. Thus the distinction between ecovillage, ecocity and ecopolis are quite clear. Each level adds new challenges and requires new solutions, so I hold the view that the different articles are useful. clacke 15:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Downton, Sociopolis, and various edits
Talk:Kim Milton Nielsen

message: I have added citations to the article and have removed the unreferenced template accordingly.
smr 21:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Should it be worth noting that he is among the 2 refs in FIFA 06 (the othe being Urs Meier)BKLC11 (talk) 05:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIA 06 
Talk:Oxyliquit

message: "A mixture of lampblack and liquid oxygen was measured to have detonation velocity of 3000 m/s2, and 4 to 12% more strength than dynamite."
I'm not happy with this statement at all. There's no citation to say who did the measuring, or any evidence that it ever happened. It's just a flat passive-voice assertion. The rest of the article is much the same: confident statements about events, and no citations. 
To cap it all, the page author gives detonation velocity in metres per second squared, which is the unit of acceleration, not velocity! --Del C 21:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:COPT Defense Properties

message: This is a publicly traded company... people ought to know what it does. It just built a $54M complex in RIchmond, which is why I am interested [http://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2006/06/19/daily2.html MPS 21:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable
Talk:Asian fairy-bluebird

message: I have a clearer shot of the bird than the image that's here. Are there any objections to replacing the old one with this?  Joyous! | Talk 21:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

message: : The one in the taxobox seems to be more field-guideish. But have added your image to the gallery. Cheers Shyamal 03:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thanks. Good solution.  Joyous! | Talk 03:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Wapniacl

message: Created the St. Wapniacl article.
--Lnbaker104 21:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Created St. Wapniacl Article
--Lnbaker104 21:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created St. Wapniacl Article
Talk:Battle of the Ten Kings

message: The Rig veda is stated to have been composed between 1700-1000 BCE, but this article states that the Battle of the Ten Kings took place during the same period of time. If it was mentioned in the Rig veda then obviously it happened before the composition.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.117.71 (talk) 16:51, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: I am seeing lot of reference from Witzel and McDonald lately on Vedic articles, including this one. Why not referencing Indian texts and writers alongside? Credibility of Witzel and McDonals is already in question.141.160.28.251 (talk) 08:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  why Witzel and McDonnell are the only reference here? 

message: Why are Witzel and McDonald the only authors cited?? McDonald is a completely incredible Quack and Witzel is a propaganda outlet? Who wrote this and thought that it was acceptable to not include a single Hindu Author when discussing Hindu history  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poxah19 (talk • contribs) 23:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources. Chariotrider555 (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

text: McDonald? Ain't Murthy a Hindu? TrangaBellam (talk) 14:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Witzel and McDonald 

message: Dāhān) were an ancient Eastern Iranian nomadic tribal confederation, and Pani or parni is branche of dahae you should add like this: 
   Panis or parni, Dasa(Dahae?)
Actually parni is dahae brache Realone23 (talk) 16:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some one edit
Talk:Kamen Rider: The First

message: Are there any citations for this change? The only reference I have that mentions it (Anime News Network, which isn't infalllible, but is usually pretty accurate when it comes to these things) says that it was the Fujioka version. Note that Japanese-language sources are perfectly acceptable, and indeed, in this case, probably preferred. Thanks.--SB | T 22:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's Go! Kamen Rider! 

message: Having seen the movie and knowing very well the difference between actor Fujioka's deeper and flatter vocals as opposed to classically trained Masato Shimon/Kyouichi Fuji's in key and higher voice. Most people don't even know there were two versions of the song (Shimon/Fuji's played the majority of the series after Fujioka's accident, so it's the most well known version), which is probably where led to the confusion on Anime News Network's site.
There's also the little fact that the song is called "Let's Go, Rider Kick!" and not "Let's Go Kamen Rider!"
--DappuDappu 15:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I admit that I got the name of the song wrong, my apologies. However, "[your] own ears" are not a reliable source. Using yourself as a source also violates Wikipedia's prohibition on original research. As I said, I have one citation that supports my version. If you are correct, all you have to do is provide a citation that supports your's. Thanks.--SB | T 23:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source: my own ears which my father can state in no longer than a feminine dream

message: Can someone put the information on the Bikes used by V1 and V2?  Cause ive seen a bike looking like V1's at my local Honda but need to confirm its right.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.168.201.217 (talk) 18:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kamen Rider Honda Cyclone. 
Talk:Travel journal

message: not sure what examples are appropriate here, but added one of the best i've seen.
Bikenotmed 22:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I've removed some of the external links to commercial sites and marked the article for further spam cleanup. It's difficult to decide which ones should be included, but Wikipedia is not an Internet directory or a mere collection of external links (see Wikipedia:External links). It appears that some sites were added for promotional purposes, leading operators of other sites to follow suit. Wmahan. 17:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Just curious what the criteria are for inclusion.  I checked out the examples that were there, and added my own, but mine was removed.  Perhaps there shouldn't be any?
-ts-
: Maybe you are right that some of the remaining links don't belong; I'm not endorsing them. But I removed your link because using Wikipedia to promote a site is not allowed, and links to blogs are generally discouraged unless they offer uniquely informative, relevant content. See Wikipedia:External links. In general, you should not add links to your own site to Wikipedia. 
: I hope that answers your questions, Wmahan. 19:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples? 

message: Hi,
I would like to place a link to http://www.searchTravelBlog.com/. I use this site occasionally for searching travelblogs.  The site searches only through selected (TravelBlog)sites.  So the results of the search returns (most of the time) an blog containing the information you are looking for.
It is based on Google search technologies and for so far I can see there is no advertising. Accept the Google search ads. So I don’t think it is commercial site.
Tell me what you think of the site and if I can insert it into the page?
Regards,
Mattijs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.220.91.208 (talk) 13:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding an link?
Talk:Revelations (Audioslave album)

message: I used the credits off the album which state "Chris Cornell, Audioslave".
These credits are done this way for a purpose. We know Audioslave created the music, but for this purpose, using the album
credits is advisable. Chris Cornell Lyrics, Audioslave Music. PaulConnolly 11:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Track Listing

message: I don't think this album is enough important to deserve an article for each of its songs. (Gothbag 13:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why do all songs of this album have their own article ?

message: I repaired the the Rolling Stone article "Tom Morello Swings His Hammer" using the Wayback Machine beta, then I did a search and found this link and archived it using WebCite . Just to let you know. — User:Allen4names 97.115.137.184 (talk) 05:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link repair
Talk:Sports Authority

message: The article currently contains this sentence: "In May 2006, all 400 stores operated under the Sports Authority banner." which doesn't really sound relavent unless you know that some of the stores changed names or when the name change happened. Does anyone have this information, or want to revise the sentence to make more sense? It's nice that the article contains current information but I think some history is important too. -- Renesis13 22:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gart Sports/Name Change

message: Is this section really necessary in an encyclopedia entry? Darry2385 00:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return Policy 

message: Come on. Oshman's, Sport Mart and Gart were all individual chains in their own right until Sports Authority gobbled them up. Surely they deserve their own pages. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 15:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: What ever happened to sniagrab references? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.208.5.3 (talk) 18:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sniagrab 

message: I see that Bain has invested and wondering why this is not in the article. If someone would contribute, I will not need to. --Wikipietime (talk) 15:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bain Capital and Mitt Romney 
Talk:Leukocyte adhesion cascade

message: What is the difference between a leukocyte and a macrophage?  Both are describe as white blood cells, but is one term preferred in specific context over another?  please clarify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.36.62.127 (talk • contribs) 
:A macrophage is a leukocyte. They are derived from monocytes which have migrated into the tissues and differentiated under the influences of various inflammatory mediators. -- Serephine ♠ talk - 07:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've proposed a merger of the "Diapedesis" and "Leukocyte adhesion cascade" articles. Both are describing the same thing, though from slightly different perspectives: "Leukocyte adhesion cascade" is more understandable to a lay audience, while "Diapedesis" has a more concise and comprehensive overview. Interestingly, "Leukocyte adhesion cascade" has a lot of specific information about selectins. However, both articles need wikification.
I wasn't sure what title to use, since "Leukocyte adhesion cascade" describes the initial cellular arrest, while "Diapedesis" describes the subsequent endothelial transmigration. Perhaps the title "Leukocyte extravasation" would be suitable. I'll volunteer to merge the two articles in a week or two if there are no serious objections. Feel free to leave any comments here. Cheers. --Liveste 06:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I support merger into Leukocyte extravasation, as this term describes both processes (and more). I'll toddle along to this article when it springs into being to have a go at it -- Serephine ♠ talk - 13:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Video Mods

message: One Video Mods episode had Hoobastank's "The Reason" on it (I believe it was the same episode with "Mr. Brightside") but I can't remember what game was featured in the video. Any help? Sensei Le Roof 00:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A missing entry

message: The video mod for Spongebob is listed and credited as being from the video game Lights, Camera, Pants! despite the models clearly being ripped from Battle for Bikini Bottom. This error is made in the video mod itself. Why? 
Should the correct game be listed? Should the one credited by MTV be? Should there be an asterisk?
173.75.138.17 (talk) 06:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Spongebob Video Mod?
Talk:Historic site

message: "Our" ancestors: whose? Wikipedia is not just about the USA. To the original author: please develop this article, lest it be listed for deletion. Thanks EuroSong talk 22:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Somewhere I recall seeing a a distinction between these two terms, but forgot which was which. In light of what this article says, it would seem that an historic site, building, etc. is one associated with some historic event whereas an historical site etc. is one whic dates to the past and may exhibit characteristics of that period but is not associated with some historic event. Appomattox Courthouse is an historic building whereas the local county courthouse might well be an historical building but not necessarily an historic one. Is this correct?  Wschart (talk) 18:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic vs. historical  

message: body of historical places 113.199.173.177 (talk) 03:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  body of historical places
File talk:Smfirstholland.jpg

message: How do you know the author died over 100 years ago?Geni 20:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The subject sank in the 1900s, so it's a fair guess Neddyseagoon 20:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1913.However there is no evidence that the guy who took the photo went down with it.Geni 22:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but if it was taken before 1913 (most likely during its active service 1900-1912) he probably did die over 100 years ago (I'm fighting a losing battle here, I know! :-) )Neddyseagoon 22:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doubtful best case senario would be 1900. He only has to live 6 years for it not to be PD. A better attack line would be to see if it is crown copyright which would mean that by now it would have to be PD.Geni 22:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: It's public domain at  Neddyseagoon 23:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bishop (Wizardry character class)

message: MrDolomite  22:13, 19 June 2006 - agree with deletion or if content is determined useful, would support recommendation to merge with main Wizardry article.
22:42, 19 June 2006- I am the arthour of this article and would like for it to merge with the Wizardry article. My username is Starcomet.
Support proposed article merge instead of deletion MrDolomite 15:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dune Messiah

message: Why do we need to know what the illustrious Spider Robinson thinks of various Dune novels? One man's opinion does not a reception make.--172.190.85.94 (talk) 04:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Reception is as reception does. Dig up reviews from other RSs if you dislike Robinson so much. --Gwern  (contribs) 14:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I had never heard of him, frankly, nor do I as yet understand the point of having one man reception sections for Dune Messiah and Children of Dune. All by themselves they just seem rather odd, with a random sci-fi author offering (self-satisfied) critiques of another's work.--172.190.125.140 (talk) 04:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: It is very much worth noting (and currently missing in this article) that Dune Messiah was a significant disappointment to many fans of Dune. It may not be unusual for a beloved first book to be followed by sequels which many fans consider not worth reading, but this must be an extreme case because of both degree of the original Dunes influence, fandom, and permeation of our culture, and the degree of dislike for the follow ups. 
This should go into the reception section, which currently includes just two quotes praising Dune Messiah. Where are the haters? There are plenty out there. The current version of this section is not an accurate picture of the reception of this book. Maxjmuller (talk) 22:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you able to point to a reliable source that establishes this disappointment? If so I'm happy to incorporate it.— TAnthonyTalk 15:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

text: But I've had trouble finding this sort of thing for Dune articles in the past.— TAnthonyTalk 20:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something is missing here