lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Doll Man

message: This section is really crappy.  Why does the description of the character read like a resume for him?  I doubt this was all depicted in Bludhaven, so why give so much weight to this trivial backstory?  Not even a mention of how his powers are depicted, what he looks like, or what he actually does in the story.  Someone who's read the comic, please help!  Postdlf 20:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lester Colt" 

message: Pretty sure Minimidget came first. Says so on his wikipedia page and a few other places. Don't have access to the wherewithal or grit to pursue this mystery. 50.136.184.48 (talk) 20:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Minimidget, that character was shrunken by someone else...and apparently that was that, the character just stayed shrunk. Doll Man actually had the power to shrink at will and then return to normal size. postdlf (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who came first? 
Talk:Ron Blomberg

message: Not sure where it was heard that his name was mispronounced Bloomberg, because thats how its actually pronounced.  I included a source, and I also heard him on the radio today talking about it. Oreo man 14:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Is a copyright-free photo not available? There are some photos on the "official" Ron Blomberg website, if you go to this page , the photos at the top are free to download for press use, I assume, but I'm not sure if that means we can post on wikipedia. I'm really quite clueless when it comes to the photo copyright stuff, so...  Experimental Hobo Infiltration Droid (talk) 20:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Firebrand (Marvel Comics)

message: In editing the Force of Nature article, I've found that Marvel.com lists the second Firebrand's name as "Broxtel" in the FoN's description, but there is no listing for Firebrand individually.  Does anyone know where (i.e., what published work) the second Firebrand's name was established as "Broxtel", and if there was a full name given?  Firebrand II's name should be in this article if known, but I didn't want to add it without knowing more, at the very least whether "Broxtel" is his first or last name. -- Pennyforth 22:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded and corrected the article. The thing is, the article was formerly incorrect; there were not two Firebrands, but three. The second one was named Broxtel, and the third was Dennison. —Lowellian (reply) 02:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Firebrand 

message: What does "codename" mean in the first sentence? Would Batman be a codename? Aipzith (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Codename?
Talk:Chirgilchin

message: Excuse me for any ignorance on my part as this is the first time I'm seeing copyvio in action.  I guess I don't understand why you just don't start a new article from scratch instead of tagging this with the copyvio template and requesting that no one edit the page to fix the problem.  Especially in this case, I just don't see any sort of reversion war going on that would require anyone to lock the article in such a manner and request any sort of review from the larger community.  How long are we not supposed to edit the article for?  It seems trivial enough to create a new page from scratch using the facts presented in the original even if you didn't know anything about the subject. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 14:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Minor addition, your source of the copyright is incorrect.  Asian Week holds the copyright on the article, not Door Dog. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 14:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The original article was a 100% cut and pasted from a copyrighted source, so I followed protocol.  I was going to suggest you create Chirgilchin/Temp, but I see you already have.  If you would like to be bold and replace the copyvioed text (and warning) with your own article, I will certainly not object.  Thanks!Econrad 03:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Q&A (Symantec)

message: Yes...the article sucks.  But I had fond memories of the database and wanted to put something out under the empty link from the Symantec page.  Everything I know about the word processor is from supporting it in college, so I don't have much good to say about that!  Sabalon 14:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Shikari

message: I see no reason whatsoever to delete this small dab. Fastifex 13:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are the reliable source guidelines.  Forum posts do not count.  Just because someone out there believes there is a legend about Shikari being the an ancient priest, or there being other dimensions, or the rest of the stuff you've added, does not make it worthy of inclusion. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?
Talk:GNU coding standards

message: Do the GNU Coding Standards say anything about line length? – 89.8.40.93 (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line length 

message: I removed the following, which feels subjective:
it can be a good idea for most authors of free Unix programs to follow the standards — whether or not their programs are officially part of the GNU Project.
Perhaps it can be reformulated on the form "XXYYZZ suggests that ...", if someone can find a good reference.
--Erik 14:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed un-encyclopedic sentence 

message: What's the rationale behind this formatting? What is it based on? Why have the mentioned decisions been made? Since it's radically different from common code formatting, there has to be a reason, right? I think article deserves a section for that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.91.30.226 (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale? 
Talk:Project 'S'

message: Since this is now pretty much confirmed to be a "series" or what might be more better described with the term coined by Square-Enix, "polymorphic content", doesn't it seem a bit inappropriate to call it a Wii game, especially since the first entry has been stated to be a radio drama?
--Yes, it does. I'll take that stuff out. But did they even mention that there was going to be a Wii game of it? Or is that just "assumed"?59.101.97.250 00:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As supported by references is better than "facts". Currently, the article has four references. If you can find more references to support the material you plan on adding, that would be brilliant. --Dreaded Walrus  t c 05:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wii?

message: http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/1512/die_without_regret_an_interview_.php
Top of Page 3
Gamasutra: I remember a long time ago you were talking about maybe working with Kojima, has anything come of that?
Suda: Did I ever say that? I did? Maybe to pay empty compliments? Really? I said that? I don't have any plans to work on a game with Mr. Kojima at the moment (laughs).
http://www.konami.jp/kojima_pro/next/ hmm that might be an S such as project S....- evidence of other wise maybe?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.165.197 (talk) 03:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This game doesn't exist
Talk:Shaun Casey

message: I think the issue of French Vogue mentioned in the article is the September 1977 issue, but am not certain. Crypticfirefly 23:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vogue cover 

message: How could I find out what magazine that image came from? I found it off an Ebay site! :-O Captain Caveman 03:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted image
Talk:Jack Cross

message: So, only 4 issues have been released so far, huh? Please post here any news about more issues getting released?
Any ideas why this hiatus?
--Haris 00:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably the usual suspect: sales.Bjones 17:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yugoslav National Movement

message: This seems like a pretty selective and dubious representation.
: How come ?? It is also based on Dimitrije_Ljotic] which has been around a long time....Nothing new nothing defamatory FrontLine 16:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious presentation 

message: Is it reasonable to describe ZBOR unequivocally as fascist without citing a reference? I haven't done much reading on this but my understanding is that during the 1930s Ljotić, at least, was not in sympathy with the fascism of Mussolini because he saw it as conflicting with the Serb orthodox faith, which played a big part in shaping his values. (I realise Ljotić must have been capable of inconistency, not least in his subsequent willing collaboration with nazism if not fascism.)
I would be interested in what The Wanderer and DIREKTOR think about this, but in my view the article as it stands now needs a tag.Kirker (talk) 09:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I've heard, they were indeed a fascist party. I remember reading about a fascist party in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia led by Ljotić. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 19:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fascist?
Talk:Benjamin (disambiguation)

message: ----
Why isnt there more on this name like there is on Alexander... name translations and uses and stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.204.42.50 (talk) 15:10, 16 May 2006
: see Benjamin (name) for that. Btyner (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't it be "fictional characters"? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously. And you already fixed it. There's no point in asking this. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fiction characters"?
Talk:Phantom Lady

message: I think Dee Tyler deserves her own, seperate article. That is all.Lots42 13:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dee Tyler 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: Why no section??
Seems like there should be one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.66.69.94 (talk) 20:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers and Abilities
Talk:List of toolkits

message: Should toolkit really redirect to Widget toolkit? Toolkit is much more general than that.
The description needs to be expanded to a broader scope, or the links need to be reorganized to different lists/categories.  
Not all of the toolkits listed are for designing Graphical User Interfaces, e.g. Adventure Game Toolkit, Battlefield Mod Development Toolkit, OCR SDK, etc.
Gregtheross (talk) 14:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

message: Toolkit, which redirects to List of toolkits, does not just refer to a collection of computer tools, it is also a physical box of tools like hammers. See Wiktionary:toolkit and google images search for toolkit. Captain n00dle\Talk 18:41, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a hat note to disambiguate and a see also section with this edit: , regards, Captain n00dle\Talk 20:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toolkit
Talk:Aaron Cometbus

message: i dont think it should be merged with Aaron Cometbus... 
Aaron Cometbus (Eliot) is a separate topic - 
Cometbus should be specifically describing the publication by the name of Cometbus
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by xsxex (talk • contribs).
:Well, I'm just saying 'cause basically everything here is duplicated on Aaron Cometbus, as well as the fact that it goes into details about his bands an' shit, not just the zine. —Wiki Wikardo 18:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there still any discussion of merging this article with the "Cometbus" article, or is that a closed issue? For what it's worth, I think they should be merged. For one, about half of the current article that's supposed to be about the zine is not about the zine, and secondly, no one ever talks about the zine (or should, imo) without also talking about the author. I could also add that the current article about the zine is pretty poor and needs a lot of work. It'd be easier to maintain one article and it'd be nicer to have one, complete, quality article about the author, the zine, his bands, other works, etc. My two cents. ColinClark (talk) 07:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. SethTisue (talk) 14:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was WP:BOLD and I did it. I think I got all of the info from the other article merged in. In all modesty, I think it's a huge improvement :-) ColinClark (talk) 23:18, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 
Talk:Lou Fine

message: I'm going to have to go find a source to verify this and login under my actual username to put it into the article, but Lou Fine was famous as the guy who could get a smoother, narrower line using a brush than other artists could get using a crow quill pen.  This is important, because when artists and draftsmen started talking about "fine lines" meaning smooth and narrow, they were talking about making a line like one of Lou Fine's lines.  His name has become a word in English, and is usually used by people who have no idea where the word comes from.  So think of him next time you're buying a "fine point" pen.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.228.13.4 (talk) 15:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
File talk:RaccoonFox.png

message: In the event I am banned or removed from wikipedia, i wish to have my user images deleted. The other one is .
  User:Raccoon Fox - Talk   15:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, you released them under a free license, we can keep them nuder such license. Tough luck. --  ( drini's page ☎ ) 23:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you should have read the policies of Wikipedia more carefully before contributing your user images. --Siva1979Talk to me 03:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
File talk:Raccoon-Fox.png

message: In the event I am banned or removed from wikipedia, i wish to have my user images deleted. The other one is .
  User:Raccoon Fox - Talk   15:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unfortunately you released them as Public Domain, and under such license, we can put it back if we want to. You should've thought more carefully about releasing it if you wanted to stop people from using it. --  ( drini's page ☎ ) 23:43, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Alexandreia, Greece

message: There is no article on this city. There are a lot of other cities called Alexandria, see Alexandria (disambiguation), but this one does not have an article yet. The main entry Alexandria refers to the city in Egypt.   Andreas   (T) 15:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burnt Offerings (Hamilton novel)

message: I've rated this as a start class article.  IMHO, the article needs:
#Info for other releases
#More detailed description of characters
#Links to any verifiable reviews
#An overall check for any other items missing from the template
I know that we don't normally edit other's text, but please feel free to add or strike items above and add a note below regarding any amendments. TheronJ 15:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:Blue Moon (Hamilton novel)

message: I've rated this as a start class article.  IMHO, the article needs:
#Info for other releases
#More detailed description of characters
#Links to any verifiable reviews
#An overall check for any other items missing from the template
I know that we don't normally edit other's text, but please feel free to add or strike items above and add a note below regarding any amendments. TheronJ 15:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:Bohemond II of Antioch

message: What is the basis for the Guiscard byname? Srnec 15:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The infobox for this individual indicates his religion as "Catholic".  While I understand that many Christians considered their church to be "catholic" (in the sense of "universal") from the second century A.D., and that there was some distinction made between the "catholic Christian church" and other minor heretical movements that occurred since then, weren't all European Christians simply "Christians" until the Protestant Reformation which didn't begin until 1517?  And if Bohemond II  was a Catholic, I have to ask, "As opposed to what?"  As opposed to "pagan"?  "Jewish"?  The current Wikipedia article on Catholicism isn't much help in making this distinction.  Thoughts?  KDS4444 (talk) 02:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That just means "Roman Catholic", as opposed to "Eastern Orthodox". I haven't looked to see who added it, but I imagine it could be someone who doesn't know there were other kinds of Christians in the Middle Ages. (I don't mean that to be an insult, of course! There was a time when I didn't know either.) On the other hand, someone will probably make the argument that there was no "Roman" Catholicism then, and it will keep getting changed to remove or add "Roman", as often happens on Wikipedia. Adam Bishop (talk) 19:59, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "Roman Catholicism" is the best expression. I would be surprised if it could be challenged based on a reliable source. Borsoka (talk) 00:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic... or Christian?
Talk:The Sounds

message: Hey, is this song "Think About That (Can You Help It)" actually a single? I can't find it on the album and there is no references to it on the internet... :-/
:The only reason that single is listed on this article is because it's on the Swedish article, so maybe it should be removed from both if it doesn't seem to actually exist. — Jl 22:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Single

message: :umm which swedish article is this? Is this article on the internet?
:I mean the article on the Swedish Wikipedia. See under 'Singlar' here: sv:The Sounds — Jl 15:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Swiss

message: Is it true that Maja and Patrick of Fall Out Boy are dating?
::No, Maja has a girlfriend she's been dating for about three years. Bottle-Of-Musical-Joy (talk) 04:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maja and Patrick?????? 

message: They're worth noting , as the UK singles have new remixes, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.199.2 (talk) 19:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uk singles 

message: one of their songs can be heard on the radio in the tanning room but i dont remember what song it was HELP?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.100.147.93 (talk) 04:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  final destination 3 

message: Can we site a source for this 2013 album? I can't find one anywhere, and the sound's bio page is just a copy of the wikipedia article (so we can't use that as a source).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koibu (talk • contribs) 21:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 album 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Truth theory

message: JA: Is this the right place for discussion?  I can't remember the last time I had to do this.  Thanks, Jon Awbrey 15:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an example: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl William Hansen. Tom Harrison Talk 16:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of AFD: [[Truth Theory]]
Talk:Twisted Tales

message: Issue guide
The last issue also had a 1 page story "Poison In The Pantry" that is not listed.86.46.37.28 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the story to the issue guide.Hal Raglan (talk) 22:27, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:International Union of Soil Sciences

message: http://www.iuss.org/popup/links.htm, should the article need to be expanded in this direction. Preferable to link to wikipedia articles for each member society. -- Paleorthid 16:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't know it is would be reasonable to have two links to the one basic website. If someone thinks that it is reasonable then I wont remove it again. It would however as you say be preferable to either link to them here or make up a List of IUSS member societies page. Ansell Review my progress! 21:25, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not an issue. Your removal was good. But the two links point to different content. The link (http://www.iuss.org/popup/links.htm) to the individual member societies is not find-able with IUSS' link structure if you start from their Official homepage.  So my interest is simply in preserving that link on this talk page should someone ever want to build a list of members sovcieties. -- Paleorthid 22:13, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for IUSS member societies
Talk:Jerry Donohue

message: It would help if User:Wobble said why the cleanup tag was used here. JMcC 16:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now cleaned up.  JMcC 11:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Chuter Ede

message: There's a wonderful portrait of Chuter Ede in the corridor leading tho the Ashcombe Room at County Hall, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey KT1 2DN (Surrey County Council's Headquarters building).
Vernon White 16:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added a great deal to the page on James Chuter Ede, and believe that the template seeking more citation can now be removed.  But I have done this by citing my own published work many times (Stephen Hart).  This should not breach the conflict of interest policy, as self-citation from published works is permitted, but I would value the confirmation from an independent administrator that  this in order.  Many thanks.
Stephen Hart, 10 March 2021  — Preceding undated comment added 17:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Assistance wanted