Template talk:Spider-Man

message: i've just finished rebuilding the whole thing, plus what was there before i've also added comic series and the video games.. do you have any comments on the new formatting?? btw. if i don't get any replies then that's okay.. nobody checks this pages except me anywayz :D --Amr Hassan 06:53, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The new template, what do u thing of it?? 

message: I find the current one leaves a few topics out, and I don't like how "video games" is squished down at the bottom, and how the movies are sort of floating in the middle.  Also I think it's more useful to have the current titles (+AmFan), but that can be easily changed.  So I started tweaking it and this is what I came up with:
// moved to Template:Spider-Man/temp // -HKMARKS 01:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You chould probably copy this over to the talk on WP:COMICS to get a consensus. :) --Jamdav86 20:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I also think it's about time this template is updated, i've created a temp subpage Template:Spider-Man/temp from the current version for temporary editing.. let's see what can be done :D.. --PASSIVE (Talk|E-Mail) 01:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  cool.  I don't really like the "pure" red and dark blue -- it's kind of hard on the eyes.  I did change the pale blue currently used to a more... um... "manly" light blue, though (for #1).   And shrunk the words a little (proportionally, of course) -HKMARKS 01:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I put up the new version -HKMARKS 04:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose new version 

message: someone added The Amazing Spider-Man: The Series article, the article didn't put any sources and i couldn't find anything about it on the web, so is this even a real show. Or is it just some vanadls.147.31.184.207 17:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Amazing Spider-Man: The Series

message: In Felicia and Peter's first encounter, she was only freeing her dying father from prison, not trying to take over the world or killing innocent children on the streets.
Just because this put them at odds for their first three adventures does not a villain make.
I think her consistent team-ups with Peter and other heroes put Black Cat solidly in the supporting section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.230.132.56 (talk) 00:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Cat is not a Villain 

message: Villains like the Grizzly, Kangroo and Spot are not noteworthy, they don't belong here. This should only include his major villians. 69.29.254.57 (talk) 01:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low rate villians 

message: Can we please stop with the overload of villians. We should stick to the majors only. 69.29.254.57 (talk) 20:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  villians 

message: This template has been protected due to contentious additions/reversions. Please discuss additions here on the talk page. - jc37 01:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected 

message: What about the three movies, Spider-Man, Spider-Man 2, and Spider-Man 3? How come they're not included? Comp25 (talk) 13:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Same reason the shows and video games aren't — all are in . - J Greb (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Films 

message: I noticed Menace and Mr. Negative on there, which are villians that appeared after Brand New Day, making them very new, they could turn out to be dangerous and major villians of Spider-Man but for right now I do think they are too new and I think we should focus on the classic villians that have been adopted in Spider-Man media. I think Morlun should be the latest villian for now. What do you think? Captain Virtue (talk) 14:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Morlun should not be on there at all. The message says The following villains have appeared throughout the 45 years of spider-man's history, appeared in multiple mediums, and/or received media attention. Morlun has had only a few appearences and he has not been adapted to alternate Spiderman comics (e.g Ultimate Spider-man) nor has he been used in other mediums. Bobisbob2 (talk) 01:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Brand New Day villians

message: Permission to use the Enforcers on the villians section. They have been used throughout 45 years of history, appeared in the Spectacular Spider-man tv series (media attention) and has been in alternate comics such as Ultimate Spider-Man. Another villian that has the same treatment is Silvermane. The Sinister Six should probably be somewhere in the template somewhere too.Captain Virtue (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Haven't they already been on the list? Anyway the Enforcers and Silvermane quailfy but we don't need the Sinsister Six. The members are already there. Bobisbob2 (talk) 13:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Enforcers

message: Morbius isn't a villain. If anything, he should be considered a supporting character. He may have been a short-term enemy before, but now he is a hero. In fact, he's one of the members of the supernatural-themed team known as the Midnight Suns.
* We are aware that he is an hero now. But he originally he started out as an Spider-Man enemy and has been one for a while. Keep in mind that section is for enemies not necessarily villains. Venom was sometimes an ant-hero but still an enemy of Spider-Man. You can discuss this more if you feel like he should be more of an supporting character though but as I said he was an Spider-Man centric character and as one he was mostly well known to be an enemy until he got his own titles. Make sure you sign your name though next time you talk. Jhenderson777 (talk) 20:03, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Morbius, the Living Vampire

message: Toxin should be added as a supporting character. NecklupA10 (talk) 00:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, He's had only a few appearences and no adaptations. Bobisbob2 (talk) 18:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxin 

message: In the hidden message placed in the "Supporting Cast" and "Villains" groups, please change have been in comic retellings (e.g Ultimate Spider-Man) to have alternative comic versions. 
24.180.173.157 (talk) 03:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Thanks, Stickee (talk) 08:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You forget to put it in the villians section. 24.180.173.157 (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Stickee (talk) 23:32, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 24.180.173.157, 21 October 2010 

message: While some may be hesistant to add any of the new characters from "Brand New Day", Carlie Cooper's status as Peter Parker's current girlfriend sets her apart. Excluding her from the template at this point makes no sense. ABCxyz (talk)
:I support her inclusion in the template. Spidey104contribs 03:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carlie Cooper 

message: Carlie was important during The Superior Spider-Man, but she has disappeared from The Amazing Spider-Man volume 3. Her inclusion in this template was based on her "status as Peter Parker's current girlfriend" and she is not any longer. She doesn't meet the criteria of "The following supporting characters have appeared throughout the 45 years of Spider-Man's history, have alternative comic versions, appeared in multiple media, and/or received media attention." I think she should be removed. Does anyone disagree? Spidey104 17:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Carlie revisited

message: I want to edit Graviton in the Spider-Man templete because Spider-Man fought him in the Acts of Vengance Comics.
GravitonStrikes (talk) 02:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was one issue. That hardly constitutes him as a Spider-Man villain. The note within the template says "The following villains have appeared throughout the 45 years of Spider-Man's history," and he definitely is not throughout Spider-Man's history. So I completely agree with Qwyrxian to NOT include him in the template. Spidey104 14:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: One issue does not make a villain Spider-Man centric. Graviton is mainly a Avengers villain, we will leave it to that. ;) Jhenderson 777 15:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from GravitonStrikes, 25 January 2011 

message: I am well aware that Ezekiel has Spider-Man type powers which can make him considered part of the Spider-Man family. But I feel he's too minor to be included in this template. Two issues doesn't cut it. He doesn't seem to deserve his own article. Media adaptions and alternate issues still compy even with the Spider-Man family. Does anyone disagree. Jhenderson 777 21:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: He makes a good point. I am not opposed to the removal of Ezekial from the template, but we should wait a few days to see if anyone disagrees. Spidey104 01:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ezekiel 

message: Wasp (comics)
74.110.23.213 (talk) 21:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why should a link to Wasp (comics) be included in the Spider-Man template? Wasp and Spider-Man have interacted, but it has been minor occurrences of no major notability. Spidey104 21:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 74.110.23.213, 5 May 2011 

message: I just want to be clear. Sorry if I sounded like I was in a WP:own. I felt that I came across that on my last edit which I don't mean to. Perhaps character's like Shriek and the alter-ego characters are fine. But it's mostly best to have a certain guideline like what the reasonable hidden comment said (that I never created) because Spidey has a lot of bad guys. But we do have a freedom to add to even still. So be bold and give you're additions a try. That's how I started. :) Jhenderson 777 18:41, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  own 

message: add spider-woman link to supporting characters
199.79.170.163 (talk) 03:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Next time I strongly suggest being a little more clear about what you want added or changed.  Thanks for your contributions to the English Wikipedia! —  (t • e • c) 14:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

text: Undone: This request has been undone. , I have no problem with you reverting my edit and requesting a consensus on this page.  Please use the correct template next time though.  , you apparently are going to need a CONSENSUS to get this change made.  Good luck and happy editing! —  (t • e • c) 17:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: , I apologize that I used the wrong template, but this was the first time I have seen the 'undone' template used. I have only seen 'done' and 'not done' templates before. Spidey104 03:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2014 

message: add fantastic four to supporting characters (thanks)
129.49.11.131 (talk) 23:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. —  (t • e • c) 23:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fantastic Four are not supporting characters of Spider-Man. They would be an equal. Spidey104 01:16, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2014 

message: I added Tarantula to the Antagonists list... the character has taken several different forms, first appeared in the 1970s (he's next to Kingpin in this classic roundup), has been in comics as recently as 2015, and appeared in a couple of comic book universes, newspaper strips and at least one video game. Seem OK? - grant (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Villain: Tarantula 

message: Remove uncategorized template, as this template is no longer uncategorized. Sparetimeinfo (talk) 06:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — nihlus kryik  (talk) 08:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 September 2017