lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Concerto in E-flat "Dumbarton Oaks"

message: The article says that the ms. is housed in the Rare Books Collection of the Garden Library at LC. This seems two conflate to separate libraries. The Garden Library and its rare collection are at Dumbarton Oaks Research Library. LC does not have a Garden Library. I will try to get clarification of the location next week; (I used to work at Dumbarton Oaks). --FeanorStar7 01:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of manuscript
Talk:Goliath (disambiguation)

message: Where's Canada's tallest roller coaster ride on this list? I've put it there a couple of months but disappared.--JForget 01:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the history.  No doubt it was removed for lack of article. Josh Parris#: 09:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I found verification on the Patent Office's website (http://www.uspto.gov) that Six Flags does own the trademark to the name "Goliath," but when I try to link to it, it gives me an error message. It looks like the link page is unique to the user session, i.e. someone looking it up would have to do the search on their own.  Has anybody figured out how to best link to the PTO website? Thanks.
McDoobAU93 14:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: why is heidenbergensis listed here?  (comment made by User:122.108.181.186 on or around 02:28, 03 December 2011 UTC)
: Done I looked at the article and could find no mention of the name "Goliath" so I removed it. Thanks for spotting it!  --McDoobAU93 02:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: H. heidenbergensis
Talk:Detective School Q

message: *Why isn't this titled Detective Academy Q?  Every other resource I've seen lists it that way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.172.155 (talk) 06:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAMING 
Talk:Steel Cage match

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move, of course. —Nightstallion (?) 09:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Should this be at Steel cage match (without capitals)? – drw25 (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly. The master list (List of professional wrestling match types) is capitalised, so I merely followed suit when naming this page. McPhail 16:28, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Template talk:External links

message: This template add not only the logical :Category:Wikipedia external links cleanup, but also :Category:Wikipedia spam cleanup. I may be misunderstanding the word "spam", but I thought that "spam" referred to intentional advertisement-like adding of external links. If that is so, then this category seems unjustified on this template. Your reactions, please. Debresser (talk) 23:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: (some time later) I echo Debresser's concern; the 2nd category should be removed. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 15:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is true that superfluous external links may be the result of link spaming, but that is definitely not always so. Removed. Debresser (talk) 00:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why spam 

message: This template is frequently – more often than not, I've found – applied to articles which have inappropriate external links inline with the article text. In such cases, the tag is usually placed at the top of the article, which makes sense. I think the documentation should be amended to reflect this usage of the template (unless this is considered a misuse of the template, in which case I suppose another template could be created instead). DoctorKubla (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody's objected, I've amended the documentation accordingly. DoctorKubla (talk) 09:29, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links in the body of an article 

message: Please put  on this template's page since I've listed it at WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 15. And please do participate in the discussion, too. — Mike Novikoff 02:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: firefly ( t · c ) 08:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{[[template:tfd|tfd]]}} 

message: Insights for Investors: Bitcoin and Ethereum Price Declines
Insights for Investors: Bitcoin and Ethereum Price Declines, Bitcoin and Ethereum, the leading cryptocurrencies in the market, have recently experienced price declines, leaving investors concerned about future trends. While these dips may seem alarming, understanding the underlying factors driving these movements is crucial for informed decision-making.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muzamilkhan158 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 15 April 2024
Talk:UFC 2

message: The event marked the first appearance of referee "Big" John McCarthy, who would be a staple in the UFC until his retirement from the UFC in late 2007.
I removed the sentence above because I'm not sure it's true. I was just watching a UFC 1 recap show and could have swore I saw Big John referring a semi-final match. Shortly thereafter I saw this quote. I checked on IMDB and Big John is not listed in the credits for UFC 1 but I still believe he ref'ed a match. So until someone can 100% confirm it, I think it should be left out. Jason Quinn (talk) 01:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Although this interview by Big John seems to suggest I am wrong. Jason Quinn (talk) 01:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted my edit for now. I would still like to see that UFC 1 match again but I guess I was mistaken who the ref was. If you've got the tape, take a gander to let me know. Jason Quinn (talk) 01:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debut of Big John? 

message: Made some minor changes and added around half a dozen references, trying to save this article from the MMA deletionists.  Any other contributions would be helpful.  Those that would like to see this article deleted should try to improve it first, if they expect to be given the benefit of the doubt and retain any appearance of showing good faith.AugustWest1980 (talk) 17:43, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I fixed two errors after watching some of the fights on UFC Fight Pass, but I am noticing that they are also mixed up on Sherdog as well, which I thought was a decent source. Also, can someone else watch the Remco Pardoel vs. Alberta Cerra Leon fight and tell me what type of submission Pardoel uses? I am fairly positive it is not an armlock, but it is some type of choke that I am unclear of becasue of the way Pardoel's body blocks the choke from view. If you watch the replay, you can see him letting it go for a split second, it looks like rear naked choke from the top instead of the back. dj_ansi (talk) 07:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors in results
Talk:UFC 3

message: The participants have told many conflicting stories about what happened at UFC3. 
Gracie has made a number of different claims over the years as to why he threw in the towel. Its been claimed that he was injured, that he was suffering from fatigue and in more recent years its been claimed that he was temporarily blind and/or suffering from hypoglycemic shock. 
Same with Ken Shamrock. He was announced as injured during the fight. But different stories tell of him being injured in different ways. His more recent story is that he withdrew from the finals because Gracie left. 
The article needs to be very careful about deciding that any particular story told is the true version. 174.46.28.58 (talk) 22:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  inconsistant stories about UFC3
Talk:UFC 4

message: I have been watching the early UFCs recently, and have noticed that a lot of the submission types for submission victories are incorrect on here and on Sherdog (where these results seem to be taken from.) I just watched Dan Severn vs. Marcus Bossett, and he won with an arm-triangle choke, not a rear naked choke at all. Of course, Dan would call it a side choke. Should we correct the results here or just leave them matching Sherdog?dj_ansi (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error on here and Sherdog
Talk:Ty Olsson

message: I worked really hard on this so please don't delete it.
I have added some more information.
:Working hard on an article is technically not a sufficient enough reason alone to keep the article -- you may want to be careful about using it as justification, because I think it may not be widely accepted as a good reason -- but you have another major problem here that should probably be addressed -- pretty much all of the information here is taken directly from IMDB.com without being properly credited.  It should probably be re-worded so that it isn't plagiarism. Xanthophiliac 07:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, I've reworded and re-formatted pretty much the entire article.  The Bibliography is now reworded so that it's no longer plagiarism, and the Filmography has also been re-worked to follow the same format as for other voice actors in the show.  I've also fixed the IMDB.com link so that it actually links directly to the actor's page as per the IMDB template. Xanthophiliac 08:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned this up too...deleted a few odd sounding edits and made it look less like a resume. NickBurns 19:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons

message: I don't know what information could be pulled because I haven't read the article myself yet but I just stumbled across this interview with Ty (from around the time Defying Gravity was on). It's on a Wordpress blog, though, so I don't know how that impacts links we can use for verifiability purposes.  In any case, have at whomever.  Millahnna (mouse)talk 06:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources? 

message: OUt of curiousity how can he be "best known for" two different roles?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.248.68 (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Best Known

message: The date of his birth might be still unclear, however I want to show you this (the primary source). --Wolverène (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate
Talk:Divergence Eve

message: In the article it says "Seraphim's anti-ghoul technology has grown by leaps and bounds despite there being only a few short days between the two series."  However, time had stopped at December 24th, so on the Ring there was no way to know how much time had gone by.  The end of the Divergence Eve portion showing Misaki in 2314 and the beginning of Misaki Chronicles being set in 2315 suggests at least a better part of a year had passed. JoeD80 (talk) 19:25, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline
Talk:DNA²

message: It should be added information about the soundtracks. There are two avaliable. One is called "Masakazu Katsura Presents - D.N.A² ~Dokokade Nakushita Aitsuno Aitsu~ (Image Album)" or DNA^2 Image Album for short. Here are some details:
ASIN: B000064QP5
Catalog Number: SRCL-3335
Publisher: Sony Records
(There is also a Booklet catalog number: SM5420 / EverAnime Records)
Year: 1995
No. Tracks: 9
Lenght: 53 min
Track names: (I couldn't translate most of them)
01. Karin, Introduction!
02. Defeated (Song: Tominaga Mi-na)
03. I Love You! (Song: Kasahara Hiroko)
04. ...
05. .. no D.N.A.
06. ...heart-breaking (Song: Nanba Keiichi & Koyasu Takehito)
07. Dear...
08. Dance
09. Last Message
Note: At least tracks 5 and 7 are presented in OST (but they could be different versions)
The second is the original soundtrack, which contains 24 tracks. It's less rare than the previous. "Blurry Eyes" and "Single Bed" can only be found on the singles of the respective bands (L'arc~en~ciel and Sharan Q). Although there exists a "blurry eyes (strings version)" in the OST it was never released the "blurry eyes (strings version 2)" and also, although incomprehensible, the "single bed (strings version)" known by many as the "Mega-Playboy theme" (both arranged by the DNA^2's BGM composer Fujio Takano)
84.90.24.156 (talk) 21:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtracks 

message: What does 何処かで失くしたあいつのアイツ mean?-Grizzly Sigma (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Is it norm on manga articles to not tell all of the plot section?  If not then tell me and I'll take care of the plot section. Even if it is norm to not tell all what it ends with now isn't even accurate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.123.206.72 (talk) 12:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section
Talk:Limnitis

message: This pages has to be moved : either to Yeşilırmak or to Limnitis. Please vote below : 
Travelbird 01:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To be consistent with similar article, Limnitis seems like the best choice (with a redirect from the other name, of course). Valentinian (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 Note : (discussion moved from Yesilirmak)
Portal talk:United States/Topics

message: Since some of the sections had items that were separated by commas, and others didn't, I made it consistent.  I also alphabetized the geography section. Nationalparks 01:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  The topics box is a work in progress.  Feel free to improve in anyway you see fit.  As for formatting, commas work just fine.  Other possible options include using dashes (–), various styles of bullets. (• or ·), or other symbols (|).  See Portal:Australia, Portal:Politics, to see how other topics boxes are done for more ideas. -Aude (talk | contribs) 01:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dragon Quest (TV series)

message: On the Japanese version of this page and on what appears to be the DVD box set's official site they also list episode titles other then just levels. . We may want to change the episode list because of this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SMimas (talk • contribs) 02:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode Titles

message: Can someone verify or post a source that says Monica Rial was the English voice of Tiala? I highly doubt that she was since she's relatively new anime voice actress. Even according to her own biography, the first series she did was Martian Successor Nadesico around the turn of the millenium.
And for that matter, can the entire English cast section be verified as well? Some of these names don't even appear as uncredited cast memebers on Anime News Network, and for others that site is the only mention I've found of their specific roles.
--76.118.227.245 (talk) 06:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification request for English voices
Talk:T. Sean Shannon

message: I hear-by doubt the truthiness of this article. 70.106.220.156
That's pretty good.  How long ago did you get this past the censors?  I miss Bear City.  I loved the one where the mom comes back home and the kid is there with the VCR... hehehehehehe... maybe one day T. Sean Shannon will revive the franchise although probably not.  Perhaps in animated form. 76.236.121.35 (talk) 03:35, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carl Denham

message: After having watched the 2005 remake of King Kong, I realized Carl Denham is the perfect example of the fictional psychopath who does not appear to be "evil." He displays many typical signs of the psychopathic personality like deceit, manipulation, fearlessness, impulsivity, an empathy deficit, financial irresponsibility, and grandiosity (his dream of being a highly successful film producer if only next time). He even has a warrant for his arrest. Most moviegoers would never think of him as a psychopath or even really such a bad guy (reckless, yes), yet the label of psychopath is appropriate.
*Correct or not, do you think it might be original research? CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 02:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to my reading of Wikipedia's policy forbidding original research, this does not appear to constitute original research, so long as I cite the sources for this, which would be the PCL-R and Peter Jackson's 2005 remake of King Kong. It appears to be straightforward application of the checklist to this character in much the same way as 4 is the straightforward application of addition to 2 and 2. I do not know of any scholarly journals that publish hypothetical diagnoses for fictional characters at any rate, so I do not see how this could be a matter of dispute anyway. Nevertheless, I mainly just edit and don't follow the latest in policy trends around here as I am more concerned with the information than with wikipolitics.--NeantHumain 05:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional psychopath 

message: Where did these come from?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.208.7 (talk) 23:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates of birth and death
Talk:Dual! Parallel Trouble Adventure

message: I understand Dual! and Tenchi Muyo are connected; because the creators said so. But ... have they said there are connections with Neon Genesis? Because if they haven't, the Neon section is Original Research and should be deleted. Lots42 (talk) 04:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not connected, but Dual! does draw a lot of influences from it. Llxwarbirdxll (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connections. 
Talk:Lockean proviso

message: "coined by political philosopher Robert Nozick" - really? --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew238 (talk • contribs) 
I doubt it. This article is not very good. Crashola 20:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How could it be improved?  Jonpatterns (talk) 10:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert Nozick

message: Locke's proviso has been used by geoists and socialists to point to land acquisition as illegitimate without compensation.
This line uses the less common Geoist in flavor of Georgist.  Georgist would be understood by more people. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Geoist/Georgist
Talk:The Yage Letters

message: Since the anon IP insists on adding information about the band to this article, I have created The Yage Letters (band) however I do not expect the article to survive very long without sources or anything to suggest notability. 23skidoo (talk) 00:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yage Letters band
Talk:Joseph Vittori

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Wastewater quality indicators

message: "...are essentially laboratory test measures of the amount of oxygen in a wastewater. The amount of oxygen in a wastewater is in turn a measure of whether or not that wastewater will have a significant adverse effect upon fish or upon aquatic plant life."
Incorrect.  It is the oxygen depletion, not the oxygen itself.  
Actually I don't think that this article should exist.  These arent the only quality indicators and BOD COD are covered elsewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.201.53 (talk • contribs) June 10, 2006 (UTC)
:If the oxygen level in a wastewater is very low, then it has been depleted of oxygen and will have an adverse effect on fish and aquatic life.  If the oxygen level is fairly normal, then it has not been unduly depleted of oxygen and will not have an adverse effect.  So the quoted statement is not incorrect.  We have only a semantic difference.  Perhaps it could be re-stated differently. Also note that the BOD and COD do not really measure oxygen level, they measure oxygen demand.  A low BOD means a wastewater that will not have a significant adverse effect and a high BOD means that it will have a significant adverse effect. In short, that is what I meant when I used the words "essentially laboratory test measures".
:I will re-word it to read "... are essentially laboratory tests to determine whether or not that wastewater will have a significant adverse effect ...". - mbeychok 17:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree that BOD and COD are covered from the same viewpoint and to the same extent elsewhere. - mbeychok 03:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Effect of oxygen level

message: on further review, I note that this entire article is within the article: wastewater. (with modifications) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.201.53 (talk • contribs) June 11, 2006 (UTC)
:Yes,it has been used as a section in the article wastewater.  By the way, you really should click on the + tab at the top of the Discussion page to enter a new comment subject as well as the comment itself. And it is considered good form to also sign your comments by using tildes, like this ~~~~ ... which will automatically add your user name or IP and the date. - mbeychok 17:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Further review

message: Some more material needs to be added to cover other tests mentioned in water quality, or this article should be renamed to "water oxygen demand" or somesuch. -- Beland 17:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion request 

message: I suggest this article should be moved to Water quality indicators whether or not the water is waste the indicators are still valid. It should include elements in :Category:Water quality indicators--Alex 15:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alex, I assume that by "move to Water quality indicators", you really mean "re-name the article to Water quality indicators". If so, I see no reason why that would not be acceptable. - mbeychok 23:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested move
Talk:ANTARES (telescope)

message: I admit my error.  You can look at my bickering documented in the archive if you really care about it. Teply 22:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ironic? 

message: As far as I know, ANTARES has nothing to do with the search for any sterile neutrinos predicted by string theory. It is definitely none of its official goals. Also, I cannot think of any way a neutrino telescope could be sensitive to anything like that - especially as ANTARES has no true capability to study oscillations (if that is what the author had in mind - the infamous LSND-KARMEN controversy, which has recently been resolved in favour of KARMEN).
Please feel free to try to persuade me of the opposite :)
GenghisDon 07:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sterile neutrinos ??? 

message: In the article, the interesting energy range for ANTARES ist stated as 1E11-1E21 eV. While the lower figure is correct, the upper figure is definitely too high, in particular for any astrophysical models currently in discussion. 100TeV (1E14 eV) is a more reasonable figure, of course barring some very special top-down models.
GenghisDon (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Energy Range 

message: The Article lacks references for quite a few statements. I would be very happy if somebody could add some.
GenghisDon (talk) 13:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call for References 

message: What rate of neutrinos have been recorded - and from where in the sky ? - Rod57 (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more on the results