lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Haruhi Suzumiya character song singles

message: I found this picture on the internet. Is it fake?  If not, then should it be here mentioned here. Victor b04 09:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be fake to me. First, if this is volume 5, then where is volume 4? And if you look at how the picture is drawn, it looks more like a fanart than the actual thing. Also, there's nothing posted at amazon.co.jp, so yeah, I believe it is fake. 十八 05:27, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake album? 

message: It seems that Volumes 8 and 9 are currently in production, to be released on the 21st of February, 2007:
涼宮ハルヒの憂鬱 キャラクターソング Vol.8 古泉一樹 (Koizumi Itsuki)
and
涼宮ハルヒの憂鬱 キャラクターソング Vol.9 キョン ("Kyon")
I figured that this information should be put on hold for inclusion until there's confirmation from a few more sources, no?
72.90.103.205 12:11, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reports of Volumes 8 and 9? 

message: Album covers are not supported in discographies. This has been long standing practice now and is not in dispute. Pick any random sampling of 50 articles from :Category:Discographies. You will not find a single article in that category that contains album covers. If by some miracle you do find one, it will have only recently been added and the covers will be removed soon. I've removed the album covers again, as this is a clear violation of our guideline and policy. Do not re-add them. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album covers removed 

message: 3 new character song albums were released for the 2009 season of Haruhi
http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/detailview.html?KEY=LACM-4650
http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/detailview.html?KEY=LACM-4651
http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/detailview.html?KEY=LACM-4652
Blckbird2002 (talk) 23:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Character Song albums for 2009 
Talk:Mehdi Ballouchy

message: I fail to see the need for the controversy section.  If there is a mention of it, it should be a sentence and not an entire paragraph.  That one incident in no way shape or form is that important when it comes to Ballouchy.  That is not to belittle the dirty move on his part; just putting it in the proper context. Prk166prk166
:Removed and rightly so. GregorB (talk) 01:02, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yiannis Ritsos

message: A significant part of this entry is lifted straight out of the Britannica 2005 article on Ritsos. As such, it violates copyright. Perhaps we should redirect this to Yannis Ritsos outright? Porfyrios 10:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Such naive legalistic amateur presumptions are ridiculous and patently a trademark of Wikipedia's activists pervasive ignorance which has been twisted for other political purposes nothing else.--Xaoskeller (talk) 23:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   NO! 
Talk:Ciudad Seva

message: Yes, but is it notable? Please see WP:WEB for our guidelines on notability for websites. -- The Anome 10:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course. It host the largest collection of classic shor stories in the web and is one of the largest digital libraries in the internet. Those statements are taken from within the site itself. I haven't added any refferences yet for two reasons: 1. I just created this article and 2. This is my FIRST article, so i'm still learning the tools of the trade. i will keep improving this article as time passes and I gurantee you that i'll be sure to make it an encyclopedic article about a great and HUGE online library.Nnfolz 16:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Alright, ill see what I can find and be sure to add it in the article. The tag about notability was the one that bothered me, the one about the sources I can live with until i'm done and I can prove it wrong ;-) Nnfolz 19:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Polish Reformed Church

message: I was a little reluctant to tag this article as in violation of copyright, but it is. The article was reasonably wikipedic and well-written aside from the copyvio, and I definately appreciate the effort put in. The sources given were:
*Official website of the Polish Reformed Church
*Official website of the church in Poznan
*Official website of the 16th century parish in Zychlin
I've listed them from the external links section because the main page is not in English. Hopefully the creator of this article does not get discouraged. BigNate37T·C 10:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the copyvio tag per OTRS e-mail. --Timichal 16:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: "While the nobles used Polish in church services, an effort was made to convert the Lithuanian-speaking peasants and serfs, but since Lithuanian did not have a written form till the second half of the 19th century, Polish stayed as the official church language." 
 
Well, that part needs rewording - Lithuanians had written language form middle of XVI-th century: read Martynas Mažvydas.
True, attempts were made to introduce Lithuanian and Zmudzki (I lack the English eqivalent of this) and parts of the Bible were printed in those languages. But, noe written Lithuanian emerged from these efforts and they were abandoned by the 17th century. The church did insist that pastors in rural congregations spoke Lithuanian till the 19th cnetury.
Kazimierz Bem
English for Zmudski is Samogitian. Written Lithuanian language did exist, take alook into Konstantinas Sirvydasfor example, o Kristijonas Donelaitis. Printed texts in Lithuanian were known in Ostpreussen from at least XVIth century.Lokyz 15:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lithuanian written language
Talk:Kenneth Hayne

message: Removed unnecessary info. This fact pertains to the High Court page and can be found there. It is merely clutter on this page. AntonioBu 10:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: removal

message: Refers to Gummow (retired) in present tense 218.103.114.186 (talk) 01:06, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: needs update
Talk:Michael McHugh

message: Removed unnecessary info. This fact pertains to the High Court page and can be found there. It is merely clutter on this page. AntonioBu 10:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: removal
Talk:Grain Fort

message: This article is titled Grain Fort, but is mostly about Grain Tower.  They are two separate, though close things.  We need to either demonstrate that they are substantially linked as one military unit or split them into two articles and get some more info on Grain Fort.
IceDragon64 (talk) 22:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. I've created Grain Tower and will shortly turn this article into one focusing solely on Grain Fort. Prioryman (talk) 09:48, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Title
Talk:M. A. Mansoor

message: Added the above tag to article as it seems to be a pro-Mansoor biography which uses emotionally charged words and statements to promote the subject of the article, while omitting significant biographical facts such as the subject's full name, full dates & places of birth & death, length of his career, details of his collection, etc.
The "Methods" paragraph attempts a validation of the subject's methods of dating artefacts; however the paragraph tells nothing of his methods at all, and simply states that objects that were beyond his skill to date were passed to unnamed "experts" and "connoisseurs": we are left in ignorance as to the identity and qualifications of these persons, and treated to the unreferenced information that until the late 1930s scientific dating was not very advanced.
The "Ethic" section needs citations for the various quotes, and contains "empty" statements such as The stories he told of these years were fabulous. and But above all, he was serving the better interest of Egyptology.
These statements convey more emotion than information.
Have removed the category tag of "Egyptologists" (those dedicated to the **scientific study** of Ancient Egypt and its antiquities), as the subject of the article was a seller of antiquities, not a professional Egyptologist (the text of the article itself concedes that Masoor was not an "expert", and needed to consult others).
This article requires some clean-up & research.  I might get around to this, but if anyone wants to beat me to it, feel free!  Bezapt 10:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Spearfish torpedo

message: This article says the contract was placed in 1994, but Red Storm Rising has a copyright date of 1986.  Is the Spearfish in the book really the same as this torpedo, or is the naming of the torpedo a coincidence or perhaps a homage?
sneakums 10:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance in Red Storm Rising 

message: Article states: "The torpedo is driven by a pump-jet coupled to a Hamilton Sundstrand 21TP04 gas turbine engine using Otto fuel II and hydroxyl ammonium perchlorate as oxidiser."
The Otto fuel II article states that this fuel does not require an oxidiser as it is self contained. 86.144.90.137 (talk) 12:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Otto fuel doesn't require an oxidiser, but its specific energy and peak power output (for a given motor configuration) can be increased by its use.VmZH88AZQnCjhT40 (talk) 20:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: What's the largest ship that these torpedoes can take out? Could one take out an aircraft carrier or would more than one need to be fired?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.65.57 (talk) 10:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the largest ship that these torpedoes can take out? 

message: The article says "It is said to be one of the most advanced torpedoes in the world, and also the fastest torpedo ever produced." This isn't attributed (who says so?), and then we have the Russian VA-111 Shkval, whose maximum speed is over 200 knots. And which would seem to be the fastest ever produced. Cyberherbalist (talk) 22:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastest torpedo ever made?
Talk:1871–72 FA Cup

message: I have the four volume set of books "Association Football" published by Caxton Press in 1960. It gives the result of the second round match between Hampstead Heathens and Barnes as a 2-0 win for Hampstead and no mention of a replay. This seems to be at odds with various other websites that I have checked. I presume that this is an error in this book. Jooler 10:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hampstead Heathens vs. Barnes

message: I have reverted this to a 3-0 scoreline. All my major printed sources (AFS Book on F.A. Cup 1871-1881, Mike Collett's Complete Record of the F.A. Cup and two version of Tony Brown's ultimate F.A. Cup results book) all list it as 3-0 - fchd 19:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: R Engineers v Hampstead Heathens

message: *The above book gives the score as 2-0. 
*http://www.footballsite.co.uk/Statistics/LeagueTables/Season1871-72/F.A.Cup1871-72.html gives 2-0.
*RSSSF give the score as 2-0 at http://www.rsssf.com/tablese/engcup1872.html.
*This site http://www.fa-cupfinals.co.uk/1872.html gives 2-0, but it also gives Hampstead Heathens vs Barnes as 2-0 no mention of a replay, so probably out of the book above.
*http://www.rpfc.co.uk/history.htm gives 2-0.
*http://www.uk1871census.com/news.htm gives 2-0.
*http://www.rsssf.com/rssbest/fa1.html gives 2-0, but this time it also gives Hampstead vs Barnes as 2-0 again. So RSSSF disagreeing with itself, at least about the Barnes game.
You would think that the FA would put up the socres on their pages but they don't. Jooler 21:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2-0

message: *This Caxton book gives Royal Engineers vs Hitchen as 3-1.
*http://www.rsssf.com/rssbest/fa1.html gives 3-1.
*http://www.fa-cupfinals.co.uk/1872.html gived 3-1.
*http://www.fchd.info gives 5-0.
*http://www.soccerbase.com/cup2.sd?competitionid=58 gives 5-0.
*http://www.the-english-football-archive.com/domestic_competitions/results/fa_cup/1872.htm gives 5-0.
*http://www.soccer.mistral.co.uk/books/kw3.pdf gives 5-0.
*http://www.footballsite.co.uk/Statistics/LeagueTables/Season1871-72/F.A.Cup1871-72.html gives 5-0.
*http://www.rsssf.com/tablese/engcup1872.html gives 5-0.
*http://www.rpfc.co.uk/history.htm - gives 5-0.
*http://www.uk1871census.com/news.htm - not shown.
----
So probably the same original source (probably this very Caxton Press book) accounts for the 3-1 result for Royal Engineers vs Hitchen and thus gives us the occurences of the R Engineers v Hampstead Heathens result showing as 3-0 and Hampstead Heathens vs Barnes as 2-0. But that still leaves 4 sites (discounting http://www.uk1871census.com/news.htm which doesn't inclde these two socres) which show 3-0 for R Engineers v Hampstead Heathens including http://www.rsssf.com/tablese/engcup1872.html which one would hope would have got right. Jooler 23:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Another bloody discrepency

message: None of these attendances are sourced so I'm removing them. They should be re-added only if sourced, as is the case for current fixtures. Nach0king (talk) 20:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing attendances
Talk:Priority right

message: This article is not very clearly explained. Could someone simplify it somewhat so that the concept can be more clearly understood by a layman? Thanks. ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 08:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a new "Example" section. I hope this helps. --Edcolins (talk) 21:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey! yeah it's much clearer now. Thanks a lot !! ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 07:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not clear 

message: I like the example also!  However, it is still unclear to me whether this example applies only to EU countries or whether it would apply to the U.S. (and other non-EU countries) as well.  Let's say, for example, that Ms A is a U.S. citizen and files her invention in the U.S. on 7/15/06.  She does not file a PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) Application. Does her U.S. filing give her an internationally-recognized priority date of 7/15/06? Or would she need to file a PCT Application in order to obtain an internationally-recognized priority date?24.105.139.53 (talk) 12:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your feedback. The example also applies to the U.S., because the U.S. is member of the Paris Convention. No need to file a PCT (although this may have some advantages, see Patent Cooperation Treaty). Example:  filed on September 16, 2005 claims priority of a first filing in the US on September 17, 2004. --Edcolins (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to Fine-Tune the Example 
Talk:MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates

message: I found no evidence that the company's name had officially changed to MDA or simply MacDonald Dettwiler.  The copyright notices on the company's website reads:
: Copyright © 1995-2006 MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. All rights reserved.
Meanwhile a search at Corporations Canada shows MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Corporation (explaining www.mdacorporation.com), active and in care of MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. -- Robocoder (talk | contribs) 11:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your suggestion, then, is that MacDonald Dettwiler is more common than MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates or MDA? - TheMightyQuill (talk) 15:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd oppose this change as well. If I was creating this as a brand new article, I'd probably have done it under the full name. However, since the article has existed at this name for more than two years, it's a lot less disruptive to leave the name alone and to create a redirect at the full name that links here. That way, if someone is actually searching under the full name, they'll be able to find it. The MDA disambiguation page already provides a link to this article, so that's covered too. Mlaffs (talk) 15:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Corporate Name

message: For reasons stated above. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 17:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your suggestion, then, is that MacDonald Dettwiler is more common than MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates or MDA? - TheMightyQuill (talk) 15:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd oppose this change as well. If I was creating this as a brand new article, I'd probably have done it under the full name. However, since the article has existed at this name for more than two years, it's a lot less disruptive to leave the name alone and to create a redirect at the full name that links here. That way, if someone is actually searching under the full name, they'll be able to find it. The MDA disambiguation page already provides a link to this article, so that's covered too. Mlaffs (talk) 15:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: somebody needs to put one of those "please fill in more information about this subject" pink boxes because there is no information about the company between 1969 and 1995.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.18.100.226 (talk) 21:51, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article sucks

message: On the announced acquisition interest by MDS in acquiring a US space-related company:  Monday, May 09, 2011 Fighting Words from MacDonald Dettwiler.  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 06:25, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 2011 

message: See Talk:Maxar Technologies. — MaxEnt 00:19, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Bahram Chobin

message: It's sad to see such lies written here, about one of the greatest heros in persian history. Chosroe betrayed his country by fleeing to Byzantine and coming back with an Byzantine army, fighting with Persians. Reason why Bahram overthrew chosroe is that, after Bahram defeated the turks, chosroe heard a lie that bahram had kept all the spoils for himself, then sending him a letter saying: you are not a man, you are a woman and should dress like one. Bahram did so to prove for his generals what kind of man chosroe is, and the whole persian army stood beside him to overthrow chosroe. The acts of chosroe is one of the reasons sassanid empire collapsed within, to be defeated by the arabs not long after.  In the future this information will be added to the article along with source. --Spahbod 11:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sad 

message: Still a lot left for the article to be "complete". A religion section is missing, and the rebellion, reign and legacy sections need expanding. --HistoryofIran (talk) 02:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article
Talk:Tironian notes

message: Why is this in “General punctuation”? I've seen it used instead of the letters ‹et› in ‹etc.›, so it is more like an alphabetic presentation form in that (German) text. Is this a punctuation mark in Irish? Wikipeditor 12:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The et in etc. is the Latin word et (et cetera = "and other things"). &c. used to be used the same way in English. Ireneshusband 10:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was aware of that – just wondered whether current Irish use is responsible for grouping it with punctuation marks. Wikipeditor 04:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  U+204A 

message: I'm thinking about having the relevant characters on the blackletter image circled, because they're a little hard to see even with the directions in the caption.  Is it just me or does anyone else agree? --tiny plastic Grey Knight ⊖ 08:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackletter image 

message: Surely, this part of the article is inaccurate w/r/t text messaging, on-line chatting, and internet posting (4 for 'four,' b& for 'banned,' etc.) -114.91.66.133 (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonetic shorthand 

message: On Marcus Tullius Tiro it says that he died around 4 BC, also with sources. Does somebody have the overview to judge which sources are better? It would be nice to have consistency. Seattle Jörg (talk) 13:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this page cites his birth as 90bc, but apparently Jerome says he died at the age of 99. 2601:344:4000:3D49:558D:5219:B4DA:2486 (talk) 16:43, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiro's dates of birth and death 

message: In the image uxote ("wife") should be uxore Furius (talk) 15:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: A regular editor here may be better able to answer the question at talk:Ampersand#Stenographic characteristics of Tironian et? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 09:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stenographic characteristics of Tironian et
Talk:Playland Park

message: I believe it is important that this page redirect to Playland, because many of the items listed on the Playland page are also known as "Playland Park". I don't think this page should be a disambiguation page either, as it will then have to duplicate many of the entires on the Playland page, and this could unnecessarily lead to unsyncrhonized updates between the two pages. As such, I've now moved the content of the Texas park from this page to its new page Playland Park (Texas). --Amit 19:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page purpose
Talk:Quantum eraser

message: Quantum eraser based in theory in part as viewed by Newtonian theory and  general relativity can be observed when two partials of protons are saturated with [ "Comparing quantum and classical correlations in a quantum eraser,"]http://people.whitman.edu/~beckmk/QM/qe/qe.pdfgamma rays in a vacuum then using reverse photosynthesis to pull the positive electrons for the nuclei in part erasing the proton for the atom of the original form.(and cannot even in principle determine which path the light took)
--RDJames 12:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Manaan

message: the kiith manaan or the star wars planet of manaan ? 
:Since the planet Manaan first appeared in the 2003 game of KotOR, while the Kiith Manaan first appeared in Homeworld in 1999, I'd say Kiith Manaan came first. The question is did Relic just make it up as a random, sci-fi-esque word, or did they take it from somewhere. Considering the biblical references in Homeworld (like the Kadeshi), who can say? --CannedLizard 22:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who came first ?
Talk:United Macedonian Organization Ilinden–Pirin

message: The EFA is a European political party which decides per definition independently of governmental opinions on membership approvals. If a party's position is unclear the EFA knows its own methods of investigating if requirements are met. UMO Ilinden-Pirin being banned by mono-ethnicism idealizing Bulgaria and being named a foreign sovereignity agent has not impressed the EFA whatsoever. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 02:24, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  EFA-membership 
Talk:Seithur

message: Seithur,a Small Village ruled by Sevagapandia thevar once. Nowadays also 18Villagers surrounding Seithur village are celebrating the festival name as Thiruvila in the memory of him
Thanks
a Seithur Citizen ( Proudly to Say )
1. we proud in ayyanar kovil steet. famous ayyanar tample here.Every saturday night fooja containd form kovil devasthana the biggest celebrations in the world
2.we proud .film director p,samuthirakani . he is our seithur citizen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandiangs (talk • contribs) 06:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

message: Arunadas singaaravelan aka P K Singharavelan M Tech,M Phil, M Sc , BL is a native of SEITHUR , finished schooling in SEITHUR  SEVUGAPANDIA GOVT  HS SCHOOL and done DME at PACR Polytechnic college, Rajapalayam now working as EXECUTIVE ADDL ENGINEER in BHEL , TRICHY and settled at TRICHY. He has  made and uploaded  'THIRUKKURAL  IN 4 TRACKS 'in GOOGLE+ which detailing THIRUKKURAL in simple TAMIL , ENGLISH translated verses  and also made ENGLISH transliteration to pornounce in its' original sounds.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.250.2 (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARUNADAS SINGAARAVELAN