Talk:Awais Leghari

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.privatisation.gov.pk/Minister-porfile%20%28Awais%20Leghari%29.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Misarxist 11:42, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Awais Leghari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131212055718/http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=93264 to http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=93264
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: federal minister (without portfolio) is clearly an office and the officeholder have a salary and participate to the council of ministers. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to left a message on your talk page. Being a member of the cabinet (without portfolio) is certainly a position but I don't think it's inclusion in the infobox is suitable. I don't think it will set a good precedent. We may mention it in some bios where there's no other office. --Saqib (talk) 13:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

text: I disagree. Federal minister without portfolio is still a minister and I have seen many articles about UK ministers without portfolios. There is also a precedent, so how are we going to set a bad one? Examples include: Brandon Lewis, Robert Halfon and Grant Shapps. маsтегрнатаLк 13:29, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  25 September was a mistake. It was the date of the article. Also, thank you for adding the true date. For the end date, it is the date when a portfolio have been allowed to him. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: OK lets re-add it since now we've accurate term dates. --Saqib (talk) 13:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal minister without portfolio