lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cagle's map turtle

message: Hey good people of Wiki, I'm trying to suss out what type of turtle I have and am very surprised how little info is on all the map turtle wikis. Pictures would be great additions, any chance?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.49.217 (talk) 21:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:Ringed map turtle

message: Apparently Ringed Map Turtles killed jfk
"] While little is known about these elusive bats, scientists have figured out that they do tend to cause small issues with global safety and peace. (Ex: The Cold War, The Cuban Missile Crisis, Titanic, and even the JFK assassination.)."TheDarkMaster2 (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is this?
Talk:Berger's cape tortoise

message: Please see the naming discussions about Homopus species at Talk:Boulenger's Cape tortoise (and Talk:Homopus). —BarrelProof (talk) 00:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming discussions

message: There is a discussion here to change the name of one of the species to its scientific name and use pointers for the various common names. I have proposed this apply to all 5 species due to the amount of discussion in the past on this. Anyone wishing to comment please do so. Cheers, Faendalimas talk 00:06, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  requested move scientific name
Talk:Homopus

message: There is a discussion here to change the name of one of the species to its scientific name and use pointers for the various common names. I have proposed this apply to all 5 species due to the amount of discussion in the past on this. Anyone wishing to comment please do so. Cheers, Faendalimas talk 00:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on naming move
Talk:Burmese roofed turtle

message: — Assignment last updated by RBuchko (talk) 02:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation Biology
Talk:M*A*S*H season 9

message: Some anchor tags to the titles that could be linked to on other pages would be great. Could someone do this? Zephyrad 04:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anchors this way, my boys, aaaaaanchors this way

message: Blooper: The Cardinal was dressed as a Bishop (purple hat & sash worn, should've been coloured red). GoodDay (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode: 'Blood Brothers' 

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:IATA (disambiguation)

message: ----
This page is the correct Wiki format for assembling and directing the various definitions and usages of IATA.  LanceBarber 05:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All related articles have been update with correct Wiki format of lead-in sentences, bolding, section title formats, ref/citation/reflist sections and locations, and categories. LanceBarber 09:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Adam Art Gallery

message: Hi! I think as it stands, the two images on the page are sufficiently similar that they aren't both needed. I think we should probably remove one – totally open about which one it is. The one I took was on a very overcast day – I just wanted to get something up! — Ballofstring (talk) 21:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should remove one of these images! Ballofstring (talk) 02:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, go for it. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Cleaned up the article; removing tag. Let me know if there is anything I may have missed (or feel free to take over). Ypatch (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags
Talk:Things Hoped For

message: Weird how the cover picture on this page in not the one on the actual book...
~User: Sophiakorichi
Actually, it is. It's just stretched vertically and condensed horizontally, then made significantly lighter.
~Evelond  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.91.89 (talk) 11:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Adeaze

message: Is the album Always and for Real independently notable from the musician duo? If not, shall it be merged? George Ho (talk) 07:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem is the RFC is not worded very well. It would help if you were to explain better what it is you're talking about since most of us have no idea what you;re talking about. :) Damotclese (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Here you go, Damotclese. --George Ho (talk) 08:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Always and for Real]] 

message: What is this song about? The music video contradicts the lyrics a little. Would love to know the reason. 125.237.72.103 (talk) 16:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A life with you
Talk:Phrynops

message: There was a note (non printing) in the main article page stating that the Spanish wp page had the complete list for this genus. It was a combination of several genera. The list here is complete it just needs to be expanded and all sub pages made. Faendalimas talk 00:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done as of March 2012. Dger (talk) 23:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other species
Talk:Red side-necked turtle

message: I have updated the synonymy to utilise Rhodin, 2011, I kept some of the information from Fritz and Havas, 2007. However some of the species in the earlier synonymy are now included in Mesoclemmys gibba. Cheers, Faendalimas talk 21:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there is a reason you have kept some of the dashes? Can we remove those? Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: yep missed them, should be gone now. Cheers, Faendalimas talk 22:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonyms 

message: In the example "Chelys (Hydraspis) rufipes  Gray, 1831", what is meant by the "Hydraspis" part? Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hydraspis is an old name for Phrynops and Gray decided it was a sub genus of Chelys not considered correct in any way but is a part of the history. Cheers, Faendalimas talk 22:25, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So according to Gray(at that time) its binomial name was Chelys rufipes? Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats correct, Chelys is a junior synonym of Chelus or the Matamata. Cheers, Faendalimas talk 14:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonyms 

message: As this is a monotypic genus and with little additive content by having both a genus and a species page I propose that the two pages be merged under the species page. A number of other monotypic genera are already dealt with in the same way I think it makes sense to continue this practice. A redirect for the genus name can be made for searching to assist readers. The combined genus and species page would have more content on that page than either could alone. Faendalimas talk 15:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep I am recommending the genus article be a redirect to the species article. Cheers, Faendalimas talk 23:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with the Rhinemys page
Talk:Big-headed turtle

message: — Assignment last updated by TJWinston12 (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation biology

message: Hey, I was going through and adding some stuff to this article, but I wasn't able to figure out how to add a source.  I added it under the Bibliography section.  If someone could help me get it in the actual references that would be great! ABuescher (talk) 02:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Couldn't Add Source
Talk:100 Great Paintings

message: Translation of this article from the German Wiki was requested, so it was done. However, the German article is largely about the German series which derived from the BBC series, so it contains a lot of material which doesn't directly apply to the BBC series.
One interesting aspect is that the names of the paintings in the German article where (naturally) in German, which means they had to be back-translated into English. Since the translator does not have the English books and never saw the series, the names of the paintings are not guaranteed to be the same names used in the BBC series and books. As much as possible, the translator looked up the paintings in Wikipedia and used the names found there. It is hoped that some later Wikipedian(s) will kindly fix the names to match those used in the series in the future.
Scbarry (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's not very clear on the page where the extra 120 paintings came from, and probably should be. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The explanation was removed in October 2020, when chunks of the article were cut and moved to 1000 Meisterwerke.  See also :de:1000 Meisterwerke.  In short, the BBC did 100 (20 topics with 5 paintings each, but which ones from this list I am not sure) and German broadcasters extended the original 100 Meisterwerke: I think they ended up with more than 220, but never approached 1000.  I see you have been busy adding 100 Great Paintings links to other articles. I hope you have a source which lists the original 100, because this is not it: I'm not even convinced that the first 100 works listed here are the original 100. Theramin (talk) 02:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , no source, was just going down the list and only realized there were more than 100 quite late in the distribution and quickly added this talk page question. So right now this article is almost useless as related to its title topic, the original 100, although the two books mentioned in the second paragraph would contain that original list and this link is the listed source of the 220-painting list. Randy Kryn (talk) 05:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 220 Great Paintings?
Talk:Flat-backed spider tortoise

message: The picture on the Pyxis planicauda page is NOT a P. planicauda, it is P. arachnoides.
202.37.65.250 (talk) 01:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: What does it eat?
The last sentence under "threats" needs some grammatical revision.
91.54.96.110 (talk) 17:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Food
Talk:Fitzroy River turtle

message: This article reads more like a handout than a Wikipedia article.  Can anyone with knowledge of this species write a better article? --W. B. Wilson (talk) 10:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This has obviously been plagiarized.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 03:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Multiple issues have been fixed, I have removed the template. Issues fixed included first person, OR, lack of inlines, lack of refs added an image. Cheers Faendalimas talk 14:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopeadic.
Talk:Ōhara, Okayama

message: This page is the target of sockpuppets. Please refer to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:B%C3%A9d%C3%A9vore/Praelongum_cross-wiki_sockpuppets
--Pa2chant.bis (talk) 04:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam cross wiki and fake 
Talk:Black marsh turtle

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Черепаха черная болотная. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.   Sun Creator(talk) 17:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Черепаха черная болотная" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ホオジロクロガメ. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.   Sun Creator(talk) 17:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ホオジロクロガメ" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dickhalsschildkröte. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.   Sun Creator(talk) 18:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dickhalsschildkröte" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Schwarze Dickkopfschildkröten. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.   Sun Creator(talk) 18:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Schwarze Dickkopfschildkröten" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Flattened musk turtle

message: This is unpublished and therefore falls into the much despised category of "original research" but for those who are interested in first-hand information, an individual female Flattened Musk Turtle lived for 32 years in captivity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.155.118.82 (talk) 06:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Longevity
Talk:Steve Rushin

message: According to wikipedia policy, whoever places the conflict of interest template should: "Like the other neutrality-related tags, if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." Such a discussion has not been placed on this page. In fact, it appears that the tag was placed by a bot. I propose that the template be removed.Miaminsurance (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was placed not by a bot, but by  here. Pinging that editor for their opinion.       StarM 01:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand the COI tag either. This is a low edit article, and I am not seeing what gave rise to the tag. I am going to WP:BOLD and remove it.--Brad Patrick (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting deletion of the COI tag per lack of prompt discussion  

message: The article needs serious pruning to make it more like an encyclopedia article and less like a magazine profile. It contains excessive quotes from Rushin and relies heavily on sources written by Rushin. I'll leave the tag for a bit then clean it up if nobody else gets to it. Schazjmd (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written like a magazine profile
Talk:Jamaican slider

message: HI  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.44.80.8 (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  HI 
Talk:Florence Mills House

message: I know this site has been delisted as an NHL, but is it still on the NRHP? If so, the delisted=___ parameter should be removed from the infobox. See Template:Infobox nrhp2/doc for more information. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 21:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was both de-designated as an NHL and delisted from the NRHP.  The [http://www.nps.gov/nr/listings/20090130.HTM weekly listing announcement covering it states:
NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY,
Mills, Florence, House,
220 W. 135th St.,
New York,  76001244, NHL
WITHDRAWAL OF DESIGNATION/REMOVED, 1/16/09
which i think verifies it was both withdrawn and removed.  That is definitive, actually.  Sorry about being vague about this, elsewhere.  Thanks for pointing it out here as an issue, now fully resolved in my view. doncram (talk) 23:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still NRHP?
Talk:Iberian worm lizard

message: European Worm Lizard parallel Iberian Worm Lizard  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.0.156.2 (talk) 21:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1
Talk:Ahuriri River

message: Traditionally the boundary was the Waikato River, north of the Ahuriri, so The Ahuriri was in Otago. Now the Waitaki District is based on the catchment area of the Waitaki, and so includes the Ahruriri. Snori (talk) 11:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Otago vs Canterbury
Category talk:Brighton & Hove Albion F.C. players

message: Does anyone want to add these guys?
Brian Powney, Kit Napier, John Napier, Shirley? Templeton, Alan Duffy, Eddie Spearitt, Norman Gall are a few I remember as a lad. But no info on then, Cheers, Willo125.239.231.91 06:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alison Holst

message: I've just removed "shortly after the introduction of television to New Zealand" as TV started in NZ in 1960, five years earlier than the 1965 date given (see Television in New Zealand). The original comment might be correct if her first show began earlier in the 1960s than stated, but I can't find any references supporting an earlier start date. Kiore (talk) 08:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start of her first television series
Talk:Magnetic Hill (India)

message: I've deleted the image that was displayed. Please upload a correct image.
Masood Ahmed (masood.ahmed09(at)gmail(dot)com
------
Magnetic Hill (India). Sir,I m requesting you to kindly correct some mistakes in the said article. In the article it is written that 10ti Sikh guru Guru Gobind Singh ji had meditated near Magnetic Hill but the fact is 1st Sikh guru Guru Nanak Dev ji had meditated at that place where a GURDWARA has been constructed by Indian Army naming Patthar Sahib.kindly correct it please.                    user: sarbjeet_1313me        29 July 2007
----
Sir Besides The above note, I am the Second Sikh Who  plead, insist & expect that the corrections sought by 'Khalsa Sarabjeet Singh Jee' be Done ! Amita Singh from Delhi Email [email removed]
--59.88.100.15 18:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amberley, New Zealand

message: The coordinates are off by some 40km. The precision guidelines would seem to suggest a precision down to below 200m for a town less than 4km² in size, so 43°9′20″S 172°43′50″E seems about right to me. Anybody want to check my working and/or tell me how to edit the coordinates? (Do you just change them in the article, or is there some magic handshake to know when fixing geodata?) -- Perey (talk) 05:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That lat/long looks good to me.  In this case, you can simply edit the  template near the bottom of the article.  Give it a try and let me know if you run into any snags. --Stepheng3 (talk) 06:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Since the coordinates were no longer sourced from nl Wikipedia, I deleted the "_source:nlwiki" part; hope that's correct. -- Perey (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Ralph Greenleaf

message: I saw this picture earlier in the year, but today, it does not seem to appear.  Can anybody fix it, so that the picture appears? RailbirdJAM 15:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That picture was placed by a user who eventually got blocked. Thus all the images in articles that particular user put on were removed as well. FoxLad 23:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I added a new one. FoxLad 12:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greenleaf Picture 

message: This article is obviously mostly a copy-paste from some emotive article somewhere (I can't prove, not having the article handy, but it's simply obvious from the journalistic style of the writing, and the lack of sources for the vast bulk of the material).  It needs to be rewritten completely from scratch, or it will be deleted as a violation of WP:COPYRIGHT.  I've cleaned up maybe 10% of it. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 18:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Website Pros

message: Regarding the announced name change to Web.com I suggest to:
* keep the content of this article as is - but with the new title Web.com and certain explanations ("earlier under the name of Website Pros..")
* change the name of Web.com to "Web.com (1995 - 2007)".
Note that it is only the change of the name! WSP is the bigger company which acquired Web.com.
Comments welcome.--Peter Eisenburger (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked an admin to assist.--Peter Eisenburger (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Thurcytel

message: The Catholic Encyclopedia article, never likely to be the acme of scepticism, says, talking of the source for this supposed person, "as this ... rests on the authority of the pseudo-Ingulf, it must be received with caution". Of pseudo-Ingulf, Knowles, et al, Heads of Religious Houses: England & Wales, I, p. 41, say: "It is certain that pseudo-Ingulf had access to a genuine list of abbots, and possibly to genuine tradition of the abbots' terms of office,; but if so, he misunderstood or garbled these beyond any possibility of recognition". Even in Riley's lifetime, people could write of "the small basis of truth upon which the pseudo-Ingulf's huge mass of lies was fabricated". Perhaps we should have an article on Pseudo-Ingulf, so that editors do not take his work seriously, but before that happens we should have an article on the real Ingulf, abbot of Crowland. Anyway, this presumes that people would read articles on medieval sources before citing them, which is perhaps optimistic. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 22:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pseudo-Ingulf

message: I removed the birth year from the article because I don't understand where this comes from. Not from the Oxford DNB article, certainly, but perhaps there's a better source? Angus McLellan  (Talk) 23:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth?
Talk:Sena Kobayakawa

message: The section on the crush is confusing. Saving a person's life is indicative of romantic feelings? I don't get it; to me it indicates basic human decency. Lots42 (talk) 20:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The crush bit 

message: This article seems to be trying to summarize the entire series. Someone needs to shorten it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.6.92 (talk) 09:13, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length
Talk:Ferenc Cakó

message: Yes, you are right , I accidentally re-inserted the "joke" by mistake.  What I meant to do was revert the deletion of his birthdate, which was printed on his website.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 07:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorry