lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Korean ceramics

message: : Note, The history of KOREAN CERAMICS includes from the beginning non-domestic wares - for example ceramic rooftiles, ceramic design ornaments and panels, and these are not pottery. A division will be made later which will be designed KOREAN POTTERY but one must begin with non-pottery items - for example votive statues, military armour with ceramic elements, architectural elements, etc.
Please bear with me before this is changed.
*It's a good idea to start an article with a reasonable amount of detail, rather than with one (plain text)sentence — especially as you don't have a user name.  Editors on the look out for the many spoof, vandal, or substub articles added by anon users to Wikipedia every day are likely to assume that yours is one of them, as I did.
*If you open a Wikipedia user account (free, easy, and very useful), you can develop an article in your own User-space, adding it to the encyclopædia when it's ready.
*Please look at other Wikipedia articles, and see how they're presented (the names given to standard sections, such as 'External links' rather than 'Webography', for example), and try to present your article in the same way.
*Aleways sign your comments on pages like this one with four tildes (~~~~), even if you don't have an account; it makes it possible for others to contact you, as well as to find out something of your editing history. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 11:43, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Hec Clouthier

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 22:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: "It is said that with the Liberal vote collapse in the 2006 election, Liberal party members would be more open to nominating Hector in the next federal election." -- what is the source? Padraic 23:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed
Talk:Skins game

message: I really think there should be two articles, or at least two sections: one on the pro game and one on the game as played by amateurs.--Pmeisel 11:55, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: We all know that the word "skin" refers to the outer covering of persons and certain animals. But how did the word became applied to mean a certain prize money in the skins game? 202.69.189.25 (talk) 04:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orgin of "skin" 

message: I was hoping to find the rules for playing skins on this page, but i didn't see anything. Hoping someone can add it. Nathan (talk) 13:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skins rules
Talk:Cornell University Library

message: Maybe it's just me being slow-minded, but this article doesn't make any sense.  What are "stacks"?  And why was the library only open for 2 hours a day???
-- Good point! Stacks are just the shelves of books; I updated that to make more sense and also provided a reference. Gwenglazer (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A pity that such an eminent building and organization has a stub after all these years.  wikiproject libraries should start assessing these articles! +sj + 00:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, have been doing some.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 16:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  stub class 

message: insufficient for separate article; best merged  DGG ( talk ) 19:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The content added is insignificant. General information about preserving library material, list of their holdings, conditions for access. This all belongs on their web site., not  an encycopedia . I am considering listing this for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 20:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As there has been no deletion proposal, I've merged in. Klbrain (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Rose Goldsen Archive of New Media Art]] 
Talk:Crater (disambiguation)

message: I didn't really think it belonged on the dab, and I'm, not sure what to do with this stuff:
**an electrical discharge such as lightning may form a crater-like pit,
**erosion may form a depression called a karst,
**a mine explosion or a bomb may form a crater.''
--Commander Keane 16:55, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Then gather some reliable sources and write the article. Pitting or surface cratering could be a valid topic in material science. Vsmith (talk) 02:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Electric arc seems to have nothing about cratering, so that might be the place to start. Vsmith (talk) 02:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed info
Talk:New York and Harlem Railroad

message: Highly unlikely.  Richard Trevithick's steam locomotive operated on a street railway in Pennydarren, Wales back in 1804.  Animal-powered street railways were common back then.
71.181.166.239 (talk) 10:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe not the world's first, but MTA claims it was the nation's first. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  18:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: ''World's'' first street railway?

message: It would be interesting to know what happend to NY&HRR, when did it cease to exists? According to this link, the company existed as late as 1974. . RustyCale 13:52, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately I don't know when the company disappeared; I added a bit more recent history though. --SPUI (talk) 16:31, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Added . Slambo (Speak) 11:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The dates of operation are actually more complicated, with the NY&H continuing to operate the Fourth Avenue Line streetcar for a while. I'll think about it and clarify the infobox. --NE2 13:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't think I had the dates entirely correct, thanks for the update. Slambo (Speak) 14:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: When did it cease operation?

message: Should this article be merged with Harlem Valley Railroad?  Harlem Valley Railroad and NY&Harlem RR are basically the same RR.  The former became the latter.  Just askin'. LiPollis (talk) 12:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: What is the relationship between the Harlem Railroad Company and the NY&HR?  Harlem Railroad redirects here, but isn't actually mentioned at all.  I'm guessing there was a New York Railroad Company which merged with the Harlem Railroad Company to form the NY&HR, but if so, it should be discussed in the article. RoySmith (talk) 22:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harlem Railroad Company?
Talk:Mount Olivet Cemetery (Halifax, Nova Scotia)

message: According to the naming convention, shouldn't this article be renamed Mount Olivet Cemetery (Halifax)?
Rlquall 13:52, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 comment 

message: I am querying the CWGC over its figures for war graves in the cemetery.  A count in their own website reveals a total of 68 (not 78) named dead, 58 from WWI and 10 from WWII. (There are no double-entered records as would be the case for those who served under an alias different from real name.)Cloptonson (talk) 11:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have withdrawn my query and accept the figures of 78 dead - I miscounted!  However, the figure for WWI dead should read 68. I will correct that.Cloptonson (talk) 17:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 2015 comment
Talk:Overkill

message: Links to this page from the main article space have been redirected to more appropriate targets where possible. Courtland 02:52, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearing links to this disambiguation page 

message: I have no doubt that the term overkill is used in the game, but disambiguation pages are not catalogs of every possible use of the ambiguous term. They are navigation pages to topics covered in Wikipedia. Each entry must either have an article or at least be mentioned in the related article linked in the description. The reason for this is that article material is (ideally) scrutinized for noteworthiness and subject to referencing, and disambiguation pages, as navigation pages that index article content, rely on articles to establish the validity of an entry. To put it another way, a disambiguation page is not the place to assert a use that is not supported by an article. If a topic is not significant enough to have an article, or be mentioned in one, then it is not significant enough to be listed on the dab page. The possible solution to this situation is straightforward: If you think that the term overkill is important enough to be included in the Halo: Reach article, then add it to that article in an appropriate place (preferably with a reference)--and then list it here. --ShelfSkewed Talk 04:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Halo: Reach'' use 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Overkill - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Size change in fiction

message: I make the same proposal as Scorpionman above.  As a dictionary definition, "resizing" is a good theme.  But as an encyclopedia article, it's a little redundant and obvious.  The article simply lists all the books and movies where people and things change size.  This shouldn't need an explanation.  I propose to delete the article, or else rewrite it.Editfromwithout (talk) 16:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Viability as an encyclopedia article

message: This article needs to be organized some more so that it isn't a mishmash of essay and list. Also make sure it is compatible with and linkable to other Wikipedia articles such as shrink ray. AngusWOOF (talk) 03:49, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Please reorganize

message: I think the giant categories are not gender neutrally named; and in fact most works of fiction have giantesses not giants. CensoredScribe (talk) 23:56, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:ANI#CensoredScribe's categories. And CensoredScribe, stop WP:FORUMSHOPPING.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Should giants in fiction be divided into giants and giantesses? 

message: I did copyedit and some reorganization, but this article is still a mess.  I feel the relevant bullet-point examples should to be re-written into prose with secondary-source explanation of why they are notable – the symbolism and how it serves thematically, the development of special effects, or cultural relevance – and the other examples should be removed. Reidgreg (talk) 15:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul needed 

message: I've stubified the article on the basis of WP:Indiscriminate. I have no problem with this being undone, I just can't think of anything else to do with it. Desertarun (talk) 14:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubified
Talk:Jemaa el-Fnaa

message: I have boosted this up to a something like a decent article.  Have photos that I will try and get scanned. Jackliddle 14:46, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What would be really good is a phoenetic pronounciationof this Jackliddle 18:29, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: That isn't the market place in The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956 film) is it?
:Yes it is. --Revas 22:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitchcock 

message: this reads like a tourist guide.68.9.130.10 (talk) 13:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: removed a few adjectives that meander from the real meaning. Thanks for the suggestion. Thanks, [[User:CaptainPiggles|DasPig talk 23:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  tone 
Talk:Marshal of the Royal Air Force

message: Didn't prince Bernhard of the Netherlands also hold this title?
I don't think so - he was an honorary wing commander in 1941. 217.34.229.213 23:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have seen a picture of HRH The Duke Of Edinburgh wearing the uniform of Marshal of the Royal Australian Air Force.  Does the rank of Marshal of the Royal New Zealand Air Force exist, in theory or on paper?  Did the rank of Marshal of the Royal Canadian Air Force exist prior to unification of the Canadian Forces in 1968?--MarshallStack 15:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Marshal of the Air Force for MRAAFs and MRNZAFs. I don't think MRCAF ever existed. -- Necrothesp 16:10, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're probably right about MRCAF; I've never seen anything official on it and the highest-ranking RCAF officer I've ever seen pictures of was an Air Marshal.  Also, you can find a photo of Prince Philip wearing MRAAF uniform in George Odgers' book The RAAF: An Illustrated History.--MarshallStack 23:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this rank exist in other Commonwealth Air Forces? 

message: He was the only foreigner with the rank of Air Marshal – https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karel_Janou%C5%A1ek
:he appears to have been granted the rank of Air Marshal not Marshal of the Royal Air Force. Dormskirk (talk) 21:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about dr. Karel Janoušek? 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Dark matter/Archive 1

message: Reading from Vera Rubin's work, I see that she does not rule out dark matter as something as simple as iron ash from a burned-out star etc. Why is this not mentioned in the article. Obviously we have not been to the outer sections of the galaxy, but why shouldn't the composition of meteorites give a clue about dark matter? Has no one else invented a crucial experimental setup to answer this? Is it because the ash would clump together, and heat up, like the earth? Ancheta Wis 17:19, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meteorites 

message: The removed sentence added nothing. It was obvious from the context that the article was not about tissue. RPellessier 01:31, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I deleted white matter and gray matter 

message: I dont see a reason why we need two categories explaining the same thing, evidence/discovery are basicaly the same thing. --Cool Cat| My Talk 15:19, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two categories merged
Talk:Warp drive (Star Trek)

message: There's an additional reference to a specific Warp-factor-to-speed statement: It's in the series-premier of Enterprise, Broken Bow Part I, where Capt Archer is consoling Ensign Hoshi Sato over her trepidations to space travel.  He recently gave the order to increase speed to WF4.4, then exclaims, "It's easy to get a little jumpy when you're traveling at 30 million kilometers per second."
-LidlTimMe  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.246.167 (talk) 00:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another exactly specified Warp speed 

message: This article concludes: "as one of the methods by which a starship intends to self-destruct" Really? Starships are inanimate in the Star Trek universe - how can they intend to do anything?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.141 (talk) 19:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really - the starship contains an AI computer which is instructed to self destruct.  The ship then destroys itself, so I can see where the original editor was coming from.  Anyway, I've changed it - as you could have done - which took less time than typing this reply.  Hey ho.   a_man_alone (talk) 08:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: This article discusses Warp drive as fictionalised in Star Trek. Discussion of other fictional references to Warp drive requires a new article; and non-fictional Warp drive theories for Faster Than Light travel is a broader topic than just the Alcubierre drive. So should there not be a top-level entry for Warp Drive, with separate articles for Warp Drive (Non-Fiction) and Warp Drive (Fiction), and subsidiary articles on Alcubierre drive and Warp Drive (Star Trek)? Oldsalo (talk) 20:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does Warp Drive just redirect here? 

message: In the paragraph:
Exact velocities were only given in the Voyager episode "The 37's" where Tom Paris describes Voyager's velocity at warp factor 9.9 (under the new warp table formula) as being about 4 billion miles per second, which would be about 2,150.537634 times the speed of light (although Voyager cannot maintain this velocity for very long).
I believe that the calculation of how fast 4 billion miles per second is in terms of light speed is in error.  Assuming that light speed is 186,000 miles per second then 4 billion miles per second would be 21,505 times the speed of light not 2,150 times the speed of light.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.228.138.22 (talk) 01:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the Article 

message: It states that Mass Effect uses warp drives too, but I don't think that is correct. They change the properties of mass if I believe correctly. Going to remove that reference unless someone can show otherwise. Dalore (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass Effect

message: I'm pretty sure that FTL in star wars doesn't use a Warp effect. It uses a Hyper Drive that puts the ship into Hyperspace where the normal laws of the universe don't apply.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.247.165.6 (talk) 09:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars Warp drive?
Talk:Aphanes

message: This is an unpleasantly invasive weed that has proven at least as hard to control in my bermuda lawn in Georgia as oxalis.  Here, it appears as early as February and if not controlled, forms dense ball-shaped clusters (like a half a grapefruit or bigger) that crowds out even bermuda.  It is evidently known as slender parsley-piert or smallseed lady's mantle, though lady's mantle is a different species.  It is an imported weed from Europe, in the rose family.  If others can contribute thoughts on effective control in lawns, it would be a useful addition.
I think this entry should be merged with Alchemilla. There is no point in avoiding the changes of APGIII and there should be consistency in following it on Wikipedia.  I hope in the near future to have time to become involved and help make these changes. The weed species (A. arvensis) deserves its own page as an invasive species.  86.205.96.187 (talk) 16:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Detonating cord

message: What's the judge of unconventional?  The typical use for an explosive is to ... well, blow things up, but there are some pretty inventive uses, I'll admit.  But what makes using it to, say, carve rock unconventional?  You'd think that'd be almost tailor-made for the task.IL-Kuma 04:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unconventional?

message: I was having a conversation about this and the first thing we thought about was the legality of purchasing/owning. I couldn't seem to find any information anywhere except for one distributors terms for sale and feel like this may be something that should be added to more pyrotechnic related pages. What does everyone else think about adding a section like this to the article?? I would be happy to do the digging if people thing it may be of use.  Ginoclement (talk) 09:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Most jurisdictions will just treat it as PETN and licence it (or not) accordingly - blasting caps sometimes have their own discreet set of regs, often for historical reasons, but, unless anyone can find different, I would tend to work on the assumption that law enforcement don't care what shape your PETN is in, merely that it exists. 82.1.7.156 (talk) 16:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Legality

message: The first paragraph says "approximately 6400 m/s", while the "Effects" section says "7,000-8,000 m/s". Anyone got some test samples and a phantom camera? Or some really, really long test samples and a normal camera?
: Not an answer per se, but could one be talking about blast wave velocity and the other about propagation over distance?  That is, firing PETN gets you a blast wave travelling at ~6.4 km/s whilst a detonation travels along a length of det cord at ~7-8 km/s? 82.1.7.156 (talk) 16:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected it to 6,000-7,000 m/s since that is was Primacord and Cordtex actually reach. Example souce: https://www.mindat.org/glossary/CordtexEheran (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detonation rate
Talk:Museum Island

message: The current coordinates are wrong and should be fixed. Right now they're leading far south of Berlin.--RR' 18:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: "Staatliche Museen zu Berlin" redirects to this article, but is not mentioned in the text of the article. It should be. Badagnani (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staatliche Museen zu Berlin 

message: In this article there is a link to a Wikipedia article about Priam's Treasure. In the Museum Island article it states that Priam's Treasure was stolen by Allied forces but in the Priam's Treasure article it says it was stolen by Soviet forces and that it now is in a Russian Museum.
I do not know which version is correct, but one of them is obviously wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twfork (talk • contribs) 21:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priam's Treasure
Talk:Government Accountability Office investigations of the Department of Defense

message: Is this name too ambiguous? Does it make clear that the GAO is the one conducting the investigations? Rad Racer 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Government Accountability Office investigations of the Department of Defense

message: How come losing track of 56 airplanes, 32 tanks, and 36 Javelin missile command launch-units gets one sentence, but raising the price of meals gets a whole paragraph?  And also this is related to the supposed loss of 1.1 trillion dollars? Is this notion a weird twist on the facts? if not it should certainly be more explained —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JonM (talk • contribs) 20:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: I know some of the investigations are big, but shouldn't this page just be part of the GAO's page? 147.240.236.8 15:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this just be with GAO? 

message: The DoD "Manual for Written Material" indicates that "DoD" is preferred to "DOD" (web.archive.org/web/20040829163034/http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/dodd/corres/pdf/51104m_030204/p51104m.pdf).  Cited from United States Department of Defense.  DavidMCEddy (talk) 20:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DoD vs. DOD 
Talk:Billy Corgan

message: There seems to be a disagreement in the edits as to the status of Billy Corgan as a poet. It would seem to me that, in addition to having a book of poetry, he also meets the non-commercial definitions of a writer of poetry:
Definition of poetry
1a: metrical writing : VERSE
b: the productions of a poet : POEMS
2: writing that formulates a concentrated imaginative awareness of experience in language chosen and arranged to create a specific emotional response through meaning, sound, and rhythm
3a: something likened to poetry especially in beauty of expression
b: poetic quality or aspect
the poetry of dance
Adding some references would be great to confirm this. Cristabel0 (talk) 09:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poet? 

message: There are reliable sources that indicate Corgan is a pescatarian. The line that he is vegan is unsourced. I cannot find any references online that he is a vegan. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pescatarian or vegan
Talk:Great Sand Dunes National Monument and Wilderness Area

message: * Talk:Great Sand Dunes National Monument and Wilderness Area – Great Sand Dunes National Monument and Wilderness Area → Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve – {This monument and wilderness area was upgraded to full national park status by a 2000 act of congress, and the change has now fully taken place.} — Tstockma 17:25, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[20 Mar]] [[2005]]