lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Wreckers

message: Why are they called "The Wreckers?"  youngamerican (talk) 00:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's as in "home wreckers". I'll put something in the article to explain. --iMeowbot~Meow 01:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  youngamerican (talk) 01:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs some better references; forums are never considered reliable sources on Wikipedia. Also, I removed the unnecessary bit about the Wreckers' message board being shut down, it's not needed info. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: User:23prootie thinks we should place discographies from Michelle Branch, Jessica Harp and The Wreckers onto one page as The Wreckers discography but I think each of their discographies should remain on their own pages. Does anyone else think this is good or bad idea. If anyone doesn't comment in one week then User:23prootie can feel free to move all of them into one. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 22:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Wreckers discography 
Template talk:USNRAs

message: A question regarding this template: Should the list be kept to just the National Recreation Areas under the National Park Service, or should we attempt to include all of those under the BLM and Forest Service as well. Right now, there are several non-NPS recreation areas that aren't on the list such as Hells Canyon and Land Between the Lakes. Any opinions? --Nebular110 00:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have broken it down by NPS and non-NPS.  Nationalparks 15:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Breakdown of Template

message: Source for addition of White Mountains National Recreation Area: , accessed 9/5/07.
- Ipoellet 21:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: White Mountains NRA

message: red links on the template do not make this an incomplete list. Rich Farmbrough, 22:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete list
Talk:Donald S. Lopez Jr.

message: Is this fellow a Buddhist or does he simply study Buddhism?  I ask because I couldn't decide whether to add him to the category "Buddhists". RedRollerskate 21:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization

message: I recently received an email from Dr. Lopez identifying him as the Arthur E. Link Distinguished University Professor of Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, and a UM press release from Jan 2006 similarly identifies him. Web references to the title as given in the article, however, are numerous. I am guessing the sponsorship of the chair somehow changed (are these getting to be like baseball parks?); perhaps the title as given should be included parenthetically with the modifier "formerly." Since I need to reply to his email, I guess I will ask him this, and make the change or not depending on his reply, but I am adding this note in case someone has another thought and as a reminder to myself to follow up. David Watson 21:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic Title 

message: I'm guessing that most Religious Studies scholars would object to a label like this. He is not writing "Dharmic" texts, only about them. I think this label should be removed, as one should distinguish between authors of primary sources and those who study them.
--Joechip123 (talk) 22:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dharmic writer? 
Talk:Endzeit Bunkertracks

message: There are three more compilations not archived here - All three being 4 disc sets, like previous incarnations of Endzeit Bunkertracks.
My wiki formatting sucks, so I haven't tried to add them.
If someone is up to it, here are the track listings and release info from discogs.com
https://www.discogs.com/release/3964717-Various-Endzeit-Bunkertracks-Act-VI
https://www.discogs.com/release/6818887-Various-Endzeit-Bunkertracks-Act-VII
https://www.discogs.com/release/13438541-Various-Endzeit-Bunkertracks-Act-VIII
Shutup Man (talk) 20:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional albums
Talk:German submarine U-32

message: *HMS Fiji Torpedoed by U32 in Sept. 1940
* The third U32 is a Type 212A submarine of the German Navy. It was constructed by the German Submarine Consortium at the shipyards of Thyssen Nordseewerke of Emden and Howaldtswerke at Kiel. It was launched December 2003 and was commissioned October 192005.
I removed this stuff from the page as it was unnecessarily cluttering for a disambiguation page. Whoever creates the artices for these submarines, please reinstate the information in those pages.--Jackyd101 00:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ITS America

message: I disagree that this reads like an advert.  In my opinion, it provides a very concise but generalised description of the organisation. --Thisisbossi 00:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert

message: The details about ITS World Congress, in the last paragraph, are garbled. I can't parse what is accurate, here or elsewhere, to fix them. NewsmXn (talk) 20:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumbled timeline
Talk:Touch Me (Samantha Fox album)

message: This article needs to be seriously cleaned up.. Anyone up? -- Diehard2k5 00:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Deathrocker/Proposed decision

message: Technically, you guys could close the case right now; but I don't think that anywhere near enough has been done.  Since the case started, Leyasu has been given two blocks (one for one month and a more recent one earlier this week for three months) for violating revert parole, and he has been banned from all heavy metal articles (heavy metal is the main topic which he edits) by Tony Sidaway for edit warring on them through anons.  He has blatantly evaded both of those blocks numerous times through anons and sockpuppets.  Please look at the new evidence that I have posted and at the new findings of fact and remedies that I have proposed.  This case hasn't received nearly as much attention as it should have. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 01:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at your proposals, but, while I appreciate the time and thought that went into them, I don't think there's a practical difference between them and what is on the proposed page now. Leyasu has indeed continued to violate his parole, but that is solved by both the stricter parole, and the fact that the parole is escalating. If he doesn't mend his ways, then he'll face a near permanent block. He already faces a yearlong block at the next violation. In either case (reformed or not) the problem is solved by the edit warring having stopped. Sockpuppetry can be dealt with routinely by administrators with a note to WP:AN. Dmcdevit·t 08:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Everything you've said here is correct, except the edit warring has not stopped.  He's still been using the anons specifically for edit warring and being disruptive (WP:POINT), although he hasn't violated his revert parole with each anon.  Could we have a measure specifically regarding the block evasions, i.e. some penalty against him that is specifically for evading the blocks?  Just simply blocking him hasn't done much good, because he just keeps coming back under anons.  That's why I suggested restricting him to one account. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 18:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We have already ruled that the edit warring ought to stop, I mean. I realize he is evading the ban with sockpuppets, and now it is up to admins and checkusers to enforce. This isn't any different from any other block evasion, and there is no use to our further disallowing block evasion. It is already against our policy, and he's already not allowed to come back anonymously to edit. Unfortunately, I think you need to find a technical solution, where we can't offer one. At the very least, if he continues reincarnations, admins need to keep whacking him. Dmcdevit·t 04:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have any arbitrators looked at the Workshop or Evidence lately?
Talk:Chugach State Park

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Parque estatal Chugach, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 94.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 13, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-01-13. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 13:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Greg Kihn

message: Can you please see to it that "Next of Kihn" is released on CD someday? I love that album, and the song "Remember" brings back some vivid memories for me when I listen to the LP that I own. That was when I first started listening to FM, KOME, KSJO, and KMEL. I think KOME was the one that played "Remember" for awhile. Neanderthalprimadonna (talk) 15:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dear Mr. Kihn

message: Is it Kin? Keen? Kine? Could someone mention it in the article? Draggleduck (talk) 15:58, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: The page has recently been edited to claim that Kihn recently (June of 2011) became the morning DJ at KUFX.  I believe this is untrue; he has been the morning DJ on KUFX for much longer than that, and no cite is given.  I can't find a solid cite with the actual date to correct the article, though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.228.54.68 (talk) 06:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: This article is entirely undocumented. Further, the prose style is similar to The Greg Kihn Band article, including some word for word replication. The band is slightly better documented, but only slightly. The similarities and the (restrained) positive/PR tone of the article indicated it was written by someone favorably disposed, if not directly connected, the to the subject(s). 
For this reason unless some knowledgeable person documents the article(s), I intend to shrink both to stub status, leaving the discographies intact.
I like Greg Kihn and his music, but this IS an encyclopedia, not a publicity venue. (This is a near replication of a similar entry on the talk page of the band article.  Regards Tapered (talk) 03:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass Deletion 

message: It'd be nice if someone more knowledgeable - and who has the time - would flesh out Kihn's private life. Who he is married to, children other than his son who plays in the group with him, etc. The article reads too closely to the band page in my opinion with only a few additions connected directly to Kihn himself.THX1136 (talk) 22:35, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life
Talk:Black Lagoon (anime)

message: Official site has it listed as Revy. Makes the most sense to go with that one. 
81.178.197.121 22:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revy/Levy/Levi etc 

message: In the Anime they refer to a mercenary group called "Extra Order", I'd say this is a referance to the now defunct Executive Outcomes. --Theredstarswl 07:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  E.O.
Talk:Results of the 2004 Australian federal election (House of Representatives)

message: Even though it was statistically marginally Liberal at the election, the said seat was held by a Labor member until the election. While that would not be a statistical gain, it was a physical gain. Xtra 01:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Liberals won [[Division of McMillan|McMillan]] from Labor."
Talk:Pope Benedict V

message: How was he Pope after his death? Did he die in 965 or 966? This article contradicts itself many times over. Can anyone help?  youngamerican (talk) 01:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the correct dates in Richard P. McBrien's Lives of the Popes.  youngamerican (talk) 21:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did this Pope really serve during the Saeculum obscurum? According to the entry on that period, he did not. Sabre ball t  c  19:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saeculum obscurum
Talk:Magic Carpet Ride (Steppenwolf song)

message: Can someone expand this?  Great song.
--WalterJid 01:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Don't remember hearing "Magic Carpet Ride" in "Easy Rider."  "The Pusher" and "Born to be Wild" did have prominent roles.  Methinks the author may have been confused.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.116.222.226 (talk) 18:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easy Rider? 

message: There's a Bedlam cover on Reservoir Dogs soundtrack. 84.248.218.89 (talk) 16:47, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bedlam 

message: Mother's Finest also covered this song. --EnOreg (talk) 13:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother's Finest 

message: Search magic carpet ride (song) on wikipedia it goes to a song by Gabriella Climi? what??? --24.94.251.19 (talk) 06:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gabriella Climi 

message: It seems very odd that a needle drop in Star Trek First Contact is relevant at all, let alone important enough to mention in the opening paragraph.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.18.242.88 (talk) 00:30, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek
Talk:Andrés Zaldívar

message: ++Lar: t/c 01:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:San Diego Bay

message: This information has been tagged as "citation needed" for more than a year: "In the 19th century there was a southern harbor ship entrance by a canal south to the Tijuana River. It was filled in by a great flood in the 1880s." I could find no support for this claim, even in detailed histories of the bay like this one, and I am inclined to delete it. Any comments before I do? --MelanieN (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm surprised it lasted that long.--Jojhutton (talk) 17:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced and possibly untrue claim in the article 

message: The article used to say "Later it served, and continues to serve to this day, as the home of the United States Navy's Pacific Fleet."
Norcalal changed it to say "Later it served, and continues to serve to this day, as a home port of major assets, including several aircraft carriers, of the United States Navy's Pacific Fleet, which is headquartered at Pearl Harbor."
I understand what you are trying to do here, but I think this wording - "home port of major assets" - way understates the importance of San Diego Bay to the U.S. Navy. It's not just the home port of some ships; it is the largest concentration of Navy assets on the West Coast, and one of (or possibly the) largest naval cities in the world. Check out Naval Base San Diego, add Naval Air Station North Island, add Naval Base Point Loma, add the headquarters of the Navy Region Southwest Command which supports shore installations in six states - we have got to find a better way of saying this than "home port of major assets". Suggestions? --MelanieN (talk) 01:47, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to describe US Navy presence 

message: "Agrochemical giant Monsanto has been sued by the City of San Diego and the San Diego Unified Port District for selling chemicals the multinational knew were harmful to the ecology, including that of the now heavily polluted San Diego Bay.
According to the San Diego Reader, city agencies filed suit on Monday, alleging Monsanto hid its knowledge of the toxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Despite being aware of these facts, the company peddled its chemical compounds for industrial use, including shipbuilding, electrical component manufacture, food packaging and paint plasticizers." 
This text is from RT and it looks like a significant development which should probably be covered. The Monday referred to would be the 16th March 2015. 58.174.224.15 (talk) 11:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is this from, please - so we can evaluate it? I don't know what you mean by RT. A link would be helpful. --MelanieN (talk) 14:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I found a story in The Reader. Monsanto is only the latest target of such a lawsuit. I'll add a paragraph to the article. Thanks for pointing this out. --MelanieN (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Development
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Pudgenet/Workshop

message: Doesn't the third sentence of the introduction bother anyone else? "After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies." Incomplete sentence. I'm afraid to change it, but someone should. I think it's used in every arbitration case. -Barry- 20:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third sentence 

message: Jbolden1517 is removed from the mediation cabal. Kim Bruning 17:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? Is this a proposal? If it's fact, where is it documented? -- RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 17:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Mediation Cabal coordination is delegated from me, so I may also undelegate it when it becomes nescesary. It became nescesary. There is slightly more detail at Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Cabal#Jbolden1517_is_not_a_member_of_the_mediation_cabal. Kim Bruning 17:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

text:  See also: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Jbolden1517_threatening_per_email.  :-( Kim Bruning 17:39, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This has been moved to archive Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive115 -- RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 11:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I hope the arbitration committee is aware that this is not the way the mediation cabal operates. Jboldens statements are fundamentally incorrect, and of course he does not speak for the mediation cabal. Kim Bruning 19:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jbolden1517
Talk:Wood-Tikchik State Park

message: The Adirondack Park in New York would seem to be larger by area. On what grounds is Wood-Tikchik claimed to be the largest? (Also note that both references for the claim in the article are non-functional links.)  Powers T 12:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: On the grounds that Adirondak Park is not a state park in the normally understood sense of the word and it is not managed by New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. That being said I'm mystified as to what's going on with the AK DNR website links. I'll see if I can sort that out. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Still not sure what the deal is, I'm not an expert on this sort of thing, but the main page for the park is now here for whatever reason. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

text: Hm, what is Adirondack Park if not a state park then?  Powers T 18:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a "protected area" apparently. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest state park?
Category talk:Household chemicals

message: I think this list is all wrong.  I have put Hydrated Silica here becuase Sodium Laureth Sulphate is here, but really, I think it should only be a list of chemicals you use as they are, rather than every ingredient of every household chemical, which is what it has become.  If you look at the actual page "Household chemicals" it is only a list of the chemicals you use, not ingredients.  Someone needs to take this in hand before it gets worse and decide how we want it to be.  Please put some opinions and ideas of alternatives here:
IceDragon64 (talk) 21:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong use of category?
Talk:The Jane Show

message: I'm glad someone created this article, because there's something that's been driving me crazy. Am I the only one that remembers seeing this show before, a couple years ago?? The year 2004 maybe, either in the evening or really late at night? I found it weird how they're promoting it as new, because I swear I've seen it before. Ouuplas 01:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now found a source which confirms that Global aired a pilot back in January of 2005, but then sent the thing back for focus-grouping and retooling. And IMDb lists it as a 2004 production. Which meshes with my memory somewhat, too; although I never saw the pilot I know I'd read about its existence at least a year ago, and had wondered whatever happened to it before it finally showed up with a launch announcement. Bearcat 02:43, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, I see, thanks! Ouuplas 22:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm one of the editors/contributors for the show on TV.com and both of you are fairly correct. The pilot aired on Global in Decemeber 2004 and Newfoundland's NTV in January 2005 and that was it until retooling was done and the "new" The Jane Show appeared in 2006. I recorded the entire show but lost some of it when a hard drive was damaged. jh0367 (talk) 18:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I am writing to you along time after you posted your comment but I’m wondering whether you ever uploaded episodes of the gene show to YouTube especially the pilot featuring Jonathan Crombie. Thank you 49.184.17.251 (talk) 09:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Template talk:Infobox US Supreme Court case

message: I've seen on many SCOTUS pages that they have an "Opinion" parameter and have attached the opinion posted from the SCOTUS website. I think it would be beneficial to have this parameter for the ease of adding the opinion, rather than having to go through making a new parameter.  Pacamah (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding an "Opinion" parameter 

message: Description of suggested change: According to :Category:Pages using infobox US Supreme Court case with unknown parameters, the 'Statement' parameter is classified as unknown, despite the fact that it is defined in the infobox code and is used in multiple articles. This can be fixed by adding the Statement categories to the list of known parameters below.
Diff:
 Politicsfan4 (talk) 03:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Primefac (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 31 August 2023 

message: Description of suggested change: Simple redirect fix: now that John Marshall Harlan (born 1899) has been moved to John Marshall Harlan II, it would be beneficial for this template to incorporate the page move for each court Harlan served on.
Diff:
 Politicsfan4 (talk) 03:18, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This request is for Template:Infobox US Supreme Court case/courts. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 03:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Primefac (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 31 August 2023_2 

message: Description of suggested change: More cleanup stuff: removing obsolete parameter (SplitOpinion), typo fix ("SubmitDatee" to "SubmitDate"), and fully incorporating the Statement parameter.
Diff:
 
 Politicsfan4 (talk) 18:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 20:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 31 August 2023_3 

message: Description of suggested change: Turns out I was wrong and the "SplitOpinion" parameter is not obsolete and exists for a reason (for example Goldwater v. Carter, where |SplitOpinion=yes is supposed to shows the "Case opinion" header). Sorry, my mistake. 
Diff:
 
 Politicsfan4 (talk) 21:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , and thank you for catching that! This infobox template is transcluded to thousands of pages, so it would be better if you were to add any future edits to the template's [sandbox] making sure that it is first synchronized with the live template. Then the changes can be tested using the [testcases] page – see WP:TESTCASES. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 22:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  error
Talk:Tasting menu

message: Is it ever found anywhere else?  Lunch with Jason 02:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usually found in restaurants 