lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spock (website)

message: if you go to Spock.com the URL reads isearch.com. They have renamed their service. The article needs to be updated. I have been looking for the reason but haven't found it yet. --65.3.234.9 (talk) 17:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty clear it's gone and I can't even see much reason to link it from the other website. Perhaps worth a brief mention in the article for that company, if there is one. Shanen (talk) 10:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Name
Talk:Junkers J 1

message: as the german wikipedia entry "Robert_Gsell" reports flights.
Haarspalter (talk) 08:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed: Ente is not known to have ever flown 

message: The para asserting that Burt Rutan was a pioneer of Glass-fibre composite aircraft construction was  and I removed it. Glass-fibre composites had been in use for aircraft construction for over twenty years before Burt Rutan even mixed his first resin batch.Petebutt (talk) 00:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Respectfully, that was not the gist of the passage, reread it to see that what was being described is the comparison of two landmark designers. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 07:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burt ruatn para removed 

message: Tidied prose, added citations, auto-edded, dupe-WL search; still ploughing through books for citations. Keith-264 (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE
Talk:81st Stryker Brigade Combat Team

message: This article should be merged with 81st Armored Brigade (United States) which is a more complete article.
:It should probably retain this title, as "Heavy Brigade Combat Team" is the current nomenclature.Martin.duke (talk) 18:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. All important info from that page is now here. -Ed! (talk) 21:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I have added several locations for the companies of the 185th. Most of the companies of the 185th have detachments that drill at armories other than their "main" one (such as HHC - it drills at both the Colton and San Bernardino armories).
LukeFF (talk) 10:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companies of the 185th 

message: As this is a NG unit, are the Distinguished unit awards state awards?  The Distinguished Unit Citation was originally developed in WWII and became the Presidential Unit Citation (United States).  Distinction is needed for this Distinguishment.--S. Rich 16:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Distinguished unit award received by A-Troop, 1/303rd CAV was in fact the Presidential Unit Citation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OregonWrestling (talk • contribs) 21:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguished Unit awards 

message: Someone cut and pasted a large amount of text from globalsecurity.org into the History section. I've removed much of it and eliminated a lot of extraneous detail.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.32.208 (talk) 17:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rewrite of history section
Talk:The Section (band)

message: because this is an article about a band so a song that has only one member playing on it, such as Zevon's "Werewolves of London" can hardly qualify as a "band" session.  There probably are more.  I understand that there was an attempt to circumscribe my objection by adding something like "or individually" but that means that any song with one of these guys playing on it, and they all played on hundreds of songs would qualify as a "band" song and that is not good.  In fact, (another term for "in my opinion) it is bad.Carptrash (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I cut out  Zevon's "[[Werewolves of London]]"; 

message: The basic core of The Section has been actively working together lately under the name The Immediate Family.  Leland Sklar's YouTube channel has been covering these sessions in some detail lately.  Not sure whether or not this merits an addition to this page, or creation of a new one, but it's a possible source of information we should consider.  --Jayron32 16:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Immediate Family. 

message: The Immediate Family is now real with a Billboard top ten album and a tour. Mhwilk (talk) 16:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Immediate Family
Talk:Columella (gastropod)

message: "If you visualize a coiled snail shell as being a cone of shelly material which is successively wrapped in a spiral way around a central axis, then the columella occupies the space where the geometric axis of the shell is." 
Sorry, this is very unclear to me. Which axis is the 'geometric axis'?  A diagram or a rewording would help. RedTomato (talk) 09:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note, you are right, it was not very clear. I made an effort to make it clearer. Invertzoo (talk) 14:40, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:My Religion (song)

message: I THINK ALL OF THIS INFO WAS CREATED BY A FAN! IF THE SONG DID HIT #1 IN THE US HOT DIGITAL, IT WOULD OF ALSO HIT #1 IN THE US. WHICH IT NEVER CHARTED IN THE US.
:I don't think so. However, it is hard believe that digital #1 would not chart on Hot 100 at all. 85.217.42.90 (talk) 03:37, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fan?
Talk:Lock convoy

message: Could Ionescu007 cite a reference for the Windows 2003 priority boost for threads being awoken by an event?  I thought this was in Windows 2000, not just 2003. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritchiep (talk • contribs) 
:This section seems to be confusing two different changes that have been made for reducing contention issues. The priority boost is for solving priority inversion, not lock convoys. As far as I know, this has always been part of the Windows NT kernel, from 3.1 onwards , although specific improvements may have been made in Windows 2000 that I'm not aware of.
:The change made in Windows Server 2003 SP1 is the removal of the fairness requirement for critical sections. Previously, it would always be the case that the thread that had been waiting the longest would get access to a released critical section. As a result, releasing a critical section that another thread was waiting for always involved waiting for the new owner to wake up (if they were sleeping) and take ownership. As you can imagine, if many threads are waiting for the section like this, then releasing it becomes a costly operation.
:With Windows Server 2003 SP1, the fairness requirement is removed and it becomes possible for any waiting thread to get the critical section. This can reduce the time spent on releasing the critical section considerably, at the expense of increasing the risk for thread starvation. Source: Advanced Windows Debugging, p. 538-545. 82.95.254.249 (talk) 18:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, you are the one confusing the balance set manager's priority boosting with the other priority boosts in Windows. Windows has multiple other prioritiy boosts other than the ones you've mentionned, including boosting on I/O completion, boosting on completion of a window message wait, boosting on completing any dispatcher wait while inside the foreground process, as well as boosting when finishing a wait on an event or semaphore. This latter boost, until Windows 2003, was a boost of +1, hoping to help the waiting thread acquire the critical section and start using it. Unfortunately, in the scenario where the thread releasing the lock was, suppose, priority 10, and the thread acquiring the lock was priority 8, a boost of +1 would not make this thread the highest priority thread on the system -- the thread which released the lock would continue running until its time slice expired. In Server 2003 and later, the waiter thread is boosted to +1 of the setter's priority, so our acquiring thread would now be priority 11, and thus the highest priority thread on the system -- it would now get the CPU and be able to do work with the resource acquired.--Ionescu007 (talk) 16:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows 2003 priority boost
Talk:Avruga caviar

message: "Avruga" is a registered trademark (according to the label on the jar) rather than a generic term.  That said, it has become popular in the restaurant trade (well, it has in London at least) and is often included by name in menus (such as at Coq d'Argent in the City) and I've seen it used as a generic on a few websites.
I noticed the brief debate over roe vs meat in the article changelog.  Indications I've found just now point to it being some "glued together to look like roe" product and I've added reference to these to the article.  I can also verify that a good photo of the ingredients will show that it contains "smoked herring" with no mention of roe, I don't have a bottle handy but when I get one I'll take a shot for this article.  I don't think these points prove the "not roe" argument, but they surely provide strong grounds for uncertainty.
There's another product on the market in the UK called "Onuga" which is also made from "smoked herring" and is referred to as a "reformed herring product" (interesting phrasing.)
--Yvanseth (talk) 22:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah...but look what these guys say: http://www.caviar-deluxe.com/show.php?cid=31  --137.186.209.105 (talk) 05:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can confirm that the ingredients only say "smoked herring (40%)", along with squid ink, emulsifiers, etc., and no mention of roe. It also doesn't feel like fish eggs, i.e. they don't burst when you bite into them. I really don't think it's herring roe, no matter what that web page says.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlobkovsky (talk • contribs) 22:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

text: It's a branded fake sturgeon caviar, or a very expensive herring roe. That's all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.17.195.217 (talk) 08:55, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Avruga
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Jonathen Crane

message: User:Jonathen_Crane
    run at Sat Jan 26 22:45:07 2008 GMT
User:                  1
Wikipedia:             4
avg edits per page     1.67
earliest               22:24, 26 January 2008
number of unique pages 3
total                  5
2008/1  5
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
              Wikipedia:
2 Requests for adminship/Jonathen Crane
2 Requests for adminship
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 22:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Jonathen Crane
Talk:Thunder Alley (TV series)

message: I am writing an article about all of the series which are in the same shared reality as this one through spin-offs and crossovers. I could use a little help expanding the article since it is currently extremely dense and a bit jumbled with some sentence structures being extremely repetitive. I would like to be able to put this article into article space soon. Any and all help in writing the article would be appreciated, even a comment or two on the talk page would help. Please give it a read through, also please do not comment here since I do not have all of the series on my watch list. - LA @ 17:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for help writing an article about the spin-offs and crossovers of this series
Talk:Ngamatapouri

message: The only people who are likely to be able to tell, straight off and without access to a reference book, which Island (North or South), which District, and the nearest main area of population, are the inhabitants of the sodding place and the local neighbourhood. It is just a little barren of relevant information for people who might use this encyclopedia to find out where the place bloody is!—Preceding unsigned comment added by LessHeard vanU (talk • contribs) 
:I believe the deficiencies you point out have largely been addressed.-gadfium 02:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the point of this entry?
Talk:Episode 9 (Primeval)

message: If you like 'Primeval' then you'll love this episode (although I'd say that about any episode) Hengatie (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Episode 9 is especially for bigcat lovers, such as ep.10 is for shark lovers, really this episode is the most violent one out of the new series.
I love to watch 'Primeval' and I really loved this episode. Hengatie (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hengatie's view
Talk:Waitōtara River

message: (copied from Ngamatapouri - this article being the only internal link available)
The only people who are likely to be able to tell, straight off and without access to a reference book, which Island (North or South), which District, and the nearest main area of population, are the inhabitants of the sodding place and the local neighbourhood. It is just a little barren of relevant information for people who might use this encyclopedia to find out where the place bloody is! LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I agree Ngamatapouri would have been hard for an outsider to tell, but in this one, it mentioned that the river reaches the South Taranaki Bight, so it's not exactly hard to deduce where it is.  If you're that geographically clueless that you can't tell where the South Taranaki Bight is by its name, its article is only a click away.  Well, for clarity's sake, I just edited the article to include the correct island. - Axver (talk) 23:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the point of this entry?

message: Would I be correct in thinking that the reference to tuna is to eels (tuna is the Māori name for the NZ eel) rather than the deepwater fish?dramatic (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuna
Talk:Shoot Down

message: I have created this page today seeing as the movie details an important event in recent history, at least to us Cuban-Americans, and will continue to edit it later.
Please, do not delete it. I was in a rush and will continue adding information later about the production and the cast and crew themselves.
If someone would like to help out, please use the provided links in the article to add information surrounding the movie.
Thank you,
Abel (talk) 23:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Needed
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Brad Harris

message: I am puzzled by one person considering deletion of an actor with a lengthy film resume who was a major star of 1960's European cinema.  The article seems to be of the right length (e.e much, much shorter than Wikiepdia's entry on 'The Dukes of Hazzard') to explain his identity and some of his films.Foofbun (talk) 23:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:MacSweeper

message: Hello, and welcome to the MacSweeper talk page. Please feel free to discuss the page here. Remstar (talk) 23:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome

message: The page currently says "Not to be confused with Minesweeper" which links to Minesweeper the type of military vessel. Should it link to the disambiguation page for minesweeper, or the page for Minesweeper (game) instead?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.252.235.234 (talk) 10:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Linking to Minesweeper disambiguation page?
Talk:Kadavu Island

message: Since User:JaGa questioned the below move on my talk , I explain it here:
: * Kadavu -> Kadavu Island: If disambiguation is needed, then it is X Island for all in :Category:Islands of Fiji. Related here is my move Bau (island) -> Bau Island, which was the only one in "X (island)". That one moved back to where it was before one user actually turned it into the for Fiji islands uncommon way.
Schwyz (talk) 01:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *I agree with JaGa, it isn't Kadavu Island, it's Kadavu. (Are you going to move Borneo to Borneo Island?) If a dab is needed, then Kadavu (island) is fine, but I really think it was fine where it was. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 09:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: The size of Kadavu island as stated in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_islands_of_Fiji is 450.3 km², whereas in this article it is listed as 411 km². This is supplementary to my main concern, which is the statement that Kadavu is the fourth largest island in Fiji. There is a journal article in the Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography which states that "The mountainous volcanic island of Kadavu (pronounced “Kandavu”, latitude (19°S longitude 178°E), the third largest of the Fiji islands, is no exception" (here is a link to the article https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9493.00045). I'm not claiming to know which is correct, however the statement that it is the fourth largest appears to have no citation, and so I think it should be updated as the third largest and a citation to this article added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sacrecoco (talk • contribs) 17:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency of stated size of Kadavu island
Talk:Tertön

message: * Change - I would not merge the Terma (Buddhism) page into Tertön, I would instead merge Terton into Terma - as the Terma page seems the most quintessential concept not the finder of Terma. - Owlmonkey (talk) 23:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: I propose merging Eight Lingpas article with this article (Tertön) as it is simply a list of eight Tertöns. There are several similar such numeric lists of Tertöns in the Tibetan tradition. I can see no reason why Eight Lingpas needs a separate article. It could easily be included in the Prominent tertöns sub-section of this article immediately following part about the five tertön kings.
Chris Fynn (talk) 20:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Eight Lingpas with this article

message: I'd like to see this article have a more balanced tone and include female tertöns. As it stands, the material is understandably biased, given that there has not been much information on female tertöns and their activities until recently. I propose to update the article to do this. Any thoughts, suggestions, concerns? Thanks. AD64 (talk) 18:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeshe Tsogyal, Guru Rinpoche's primary consort was hiding termas with Guru Rinpoche, who had many prominent female disciples. I imagine some of the 25 disciples to be reborn as Tertons were women. Worth looking into!Badabara (talk) 04:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Female tertöns

message: The article appears to duplicate wikilinks e.g. Pema Lingpa, and also have other redundancies, perhaps stemming form the fairly recent merging of the Eight Lingpas article.  The article also seems to name at least one tertön in two different ways, e.g. "Guru Chowang (1212–1270)" and "Guru Chökyi Wangchuk (1212–1270)" are likely to be the same person (unless there's a remarkable coincidence in their birth and death years).
We need an editor with more than passing familiarity with the subject matter to clean these discrepancies up.  (Not me.)  yoyo (talk) 14:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplications and other redundancies
Talk:De Lancey's Brigade

message: ...The DeLancey Brigaade is suppose to be New York's Official Police Force before the Revolution. I will conduct more information , due to the riot's and the Sheriff's of WestChester County New York whom were relatives to Oliver DeLancey Sr. Peter DeLancey was his older brother Peter's son also held the position of sheriff. It would be essential to look into the early years of the 1770's for this enacting group.David George DeLancey (talk) 11:38, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Ponnala Lakshmaiah

message: I have added the reference about Ponnala.I would expand this article in due course
John Rambo 23:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: added the reference 

message: A lot of unreferenced material has been added that needs copyeditting.  One significant item is the appropriate spelling for the subject's name as the original article spelled the surname "Laxmiah", and the subsequent edits has used "Lakshmaiah". -- Whpq (talk) 13:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit (Apr 2010)

message: With some regret, I've cut a lot of junk from the article.
(Why the regret? Well, it was so bad that it was funny.)
In deleting this, I also left the article unillustrated. Cnu0870, avid augmenter of this article, has also added related graphics to Commons. But the odd thing is, these graphics appear to be by two or more people, yet Cnu0870 claims to be the author of all of them.
Even aside from the lack of graphics, the article is of course terrible as it stands. If nobody sources it quickly, editorial machetes may be called for. -- Hoary (talk) 14:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: I've cut a lot of junk
Talk:Botsa Jhansi Lakshmi

message: Added the Lok sabha reference John Rambo 23:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:Two Oceans Aquarium

message: Hi, I'm an employee of the Two Oceans Aquarium, the organisation which this article is about. I will endeavour to only make edits that improve the quality of the article (eg. grammar) or which correct and/or add to the body of impartial facts about the Aquarium (eg. animals on display, names of exhibit spaces). I will do my best not to make any changes or edits which are based on opinion, company policy, or which hide anything controversial or unflattering which is in the public domain. Obviously, I'm no no expert on Wikipedia's COI policies, so would greatly appreciate community guidance should anything I contribute be deemed inappropriate. 2OceansDevon (talk) 06:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connected contributor declaration 

message: information 197.229.6.233 (talk) 14:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pamphlet
Talk:Unitarian Church of All Souls

message: Why do the links (under “Further reading”):
*“All Souls Unitarian Church”
*“All Souls History”
link to Blackbaud Shere (fundraising)?
Vzeebjtf (talk) 18:46, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird links 
Talk:Kieron Hobbs

message: Unless there is significant real-world coverage from multiple reliable sources, this article needs to be moved back to the list of characters.  -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 22:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I already said on the list of minor characters page, I do not believe that Kieron is that major a character yet. I think this page should be redirected back to the minor characters page, and any new (notable!) changes merged back into that one. ~~ [Jam][talk] 22:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've re-instated Kieron on the list of minor characters page, and updated it for recent events. ~~ [Jam][talk] 09:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case when you start to believe he is, put him back in. I've faught this one out too long now. I'll go with whatever you say. Atleast your keeping it updated. :) Raintheone (talk) 01:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to go back and forth with what page he should be on, because of characters like Aleksander Malota who have their own pages and probably shouldn't based on their stories and the limited time they were on the show (his page was created before we had a minor characters page). I think if Kieron is still on the show past this present story, if he has other stories beyond the story he currently has with John Paul, then maybe we should consider making him a main character. --JamesB3 (talk) 08:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Raintheone, as has been said before, he needs to meet the notability requirements on WP:FICT before he can have this own page. Many of the character pages we have are not actually eligible for their own page (Aleksander is one example), and when I get a chance (or someone else does), I'll merge them into the minor characters page. I think we still need to wait with Kieron until he has some major stories, or (as per WP:FICT) some real-world associations. ~~ [Jam][talk] 09:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Samuel Cashwan

message: I am trying to get in touch with the Official Cashwan web site folks as thre is no link there to contact them.  Drop me a note here, there or anywhere.  Carptrash (talk) 23:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)