Talk:List of Danzan-ryū techniques

message: Who can give more information on Isami Tsuki Nage and how it differs from school to school?  User5802 22:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isami Tsuki Nage 

message: Professors Law, Estes, and Marion Anderson all spelled the 1st art as Isami Tasuki Nage. Professor Cahill spelled it Isami Tatsuki Nage. The Board in Master Okazaki's dojo spelled it Isami Tasuki Nage.
=============
I think it's worthwhile and beneficial to note the differences in spelling that are well documented at the reliable and notable source provided. The differences in how the technique is performed are also great, don't see how that is POV. User5802 04:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok let's get some other opinions to help settle this minor issue. User5802 17:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the differences are sourced then including them is legitimate somewhere and it is not pov, the question is where to include it. If there are differences in other techniques or groups of techniques then including those not removing this would seem the sensible option. Would it make more sense to write the article on the technique and include the info there? --Nate1481( t/c) 07:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are *lots* of variants for *every one* of these techniques. Some are more common; some less. Some are identified with a particular lineage; others not so much. Trying to include them all would become *very* unwieldy, *very* fast. The place to detail the different variants would be in an article on the particular technique. That article could then be linked to the list here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.111.228.102 (talk) 08:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isami Tsuki Nage note 

message: I think it's worthwhile and beneficial to note the differences in spelling that are well documented at the reliable and notable source provided. The differences in how the technique is performed are also great, don't see how that is POV. User5802 04:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok let's get some other opinions to help settle this minor issue. User5802 17:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the differences are sourced then including them is legitimate somewhere and it is not pov, the question is where to include it. If there are differences in other techniques or groups of techniques then including those not removing this would seem the sensible option. Would it make more sense to write the article on the technique and include the info there? --Nate1481( t/c) 07:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are *lots* of variants for *every one* of these techniques. Some are more common; some less. Some are identified with a particular lineage; others not so much. Trying to include them all would become *very* unwieldy, *very* fast. The place to detail the different variants would be in an article on the particular technique. That article could then be linked to the list here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.111.228.102 (talk) 08:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: The alternate meanings of the titles of these boards is important. Okazaki named the boards for a reason, and it should be the purpose of this article to display the factual names and meanings Okazaki intended for them. By removing certain meanings or titles, you are restricting further research or discussion on those titles. User5802 05:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate meanings of board names 

message: It appears some are deleting boards from here, using the justification "deleted hiden techniks out of respect" Do not agree with this. If something is common knowledge it should not be removed from Wikipedia based on others considering it "hiden techniks" User5802 21:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Resubmitted Shinyo and Shinjen AGAIN after they were deleted with reason "teqniques with no refrences" by anonymous user User5802 11:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

text: As the information here is a list of names it does not actually explain the techniques this shouldn't be to much trouble. --Nate1481(t/c) 10:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of boards 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on List of Danzan-ryū techniques. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101225143247/http://goshinjitsu.net/ to http://www.goshinjitsu.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified