Talk:Malik al-Ashtar

message: The only available one is "monarch" while this can (kind of) apply to Emirs and Sultans it absolutely cannot apply to the office of Caliph or Caliphate. These are two extremely different terms and it's important to recognize this as such. A monarch is one that is bound by a constitution or is absolute, a Caliph must be binding to the Quran, the Sunnah and the Shura of his people. This is one of the responsibilities outlined to Malik Al-Ashtar by Ali (RA) himself. I would be more than happy to provide more sources for this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1970:5163:1200:0:0:0:9486 (talk) 03:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: strong need for a "Caliph" template

message: the part about uthman uses shiite ahadith as references and these hadith are extremley biased and especially so against uthman. shiite ahadith is not accepted by sunnis who make up 85%-90% of claiments to islam.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.199.110 (talk) 03:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Part about uthman

message: I'm new to wiki editing so I don't know how to do this.  There is a correction that must be made to the title, "Malik ibn Ashter".  It must be corrected to "Malik al-Ashtar since "al-Ashtar" was an appellation and not his father's name.  I have mentioned this in the article, but I don't know how to make the change to the title, nor do I know how to do this for the Arabic language part where his name his written again as "Malik ibn Ashtar" which is incorrect.  Any changes and/or assistance would be much appreciated. --Furtfurt 20:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the Title and the Arabic 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Malik al-Ashtar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121203070212/http://www.sayedammar.com/ARBAEEN%202011/arbaeen2011poppa.html to http://www.sayedammar.com/ARBAEEN%202011/arbaeen2011poppa.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121203070212/http://www.sayedammar.com/ARBAEEN%202011/arbaeen2011poppa.html to http://www.sayedammar.com/ARBAEEN%202011/arbaeen2011poppa.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205023047/http://www.eskiyurt.org.ua/az_melik.html to http://eskiyurt.org.ua/az_melik.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: restore the stable title Malik al-Ashtar per the discussion below and the block of the originator of this request as a sockpuppet.  Dekimasuよ! 05:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Malik bin al-Harith →  – Early Islamic figures are all written with "ibn" instead of "bin" such as Ammar ibn Yasir, Khalid ibn al-Walid, Amr ibn al-As, Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr etc. Literally all are spelled this way, "bin" is more used on modern articles such as Mohammed bin Salman, Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan etc. Shi'anAliIbnAbiTalib (talk) 10:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 December 2023