Talk:Caroline of Brunswick

message: ODNB says ". . . convince many peers of her guilt, many also feared that her condemnation would spark off popular rioting or even revolution. Ministers realized that even if the Lords passed the bill the House of Commons would almost certainly reject it under intense pressure from their constituents. The bill passed its third reading in the Lords by only nine votes and Liverpool, the prime minister, announced on 10 November that it would proceed no further.
SOURCE: E. A. Smith, ‘Caroline (1768–1821)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford Universityy Press, 2004 accessed 30 Sept 2006.
Why does WP think the Bill was defeated? 
Did she play cricket for England?88.211.22.56 (talk) 11:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: text corrected.Ekem 14:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pains and Penalties Bill 1820

message: There seems to be a conflict between the narrative on this page and of that on the page of Stephen Lushington johnnybriggs (talk) 08:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stephen Lushington

message: ... Henry Brougham (pronounced "broom", "brew-am", or "bro'am")....
Do we mean it was pronounced three ways, or that we're not sure how it was pronounced? Sca (talk) 16:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I boldly removed it, it's not even listed three ways on Brougham's own wikipedia article. Tkech (talk) 11:46, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Henry Brougham

message: Recently the file :File:Caroline Amelia Elizabeth of Brunswick by Sir George Hayter.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 02:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New file [[:File:Caroline Amelia Elizabeth of Brunswick by Sir George Hayter.jpg]] 

message: Given the vandalism was encouraged by the BBC Cricket coverage, I think it is fair to point to the BBC Complaints homepage. I know I will be submitting a complaint about this matter. Catwhoorg (talk) 13:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complaints to the BBC. 

message: http://web.archive.org/web/20080706170406/http://www.old-church-galleries.com/stock_7336.asp details "A fine and rare proof engraving of the House of Lords interior. The scene relates to the time when Caroline Brunswick, estranged wife of King George IV was brought before the House of Lords following her husband’s accession to the Throne. The Pains and Penalties Bill 1820 was introduced in Parliament in order to strip Caroline of the title of Queen and dissolve her marriage to the King on the grounds that Caroline had been involved with a man called Bartolomeo Bergami, ("a foreigner of low station") in a most degrading intimacy."  Why is there no mention of this episode in the article? 2.31.162.47 (talk) 00:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is. In fact, it's the bulk of the article and there are four pictures of it. DrKay (talk) 08:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bartolomeo Bergami 

message: In the Engagement section, it stated 'Caroline and Malmesbury left Cuxhaven in the Jupiter.' I Googled 'in a ship or on a ship' and the general consensus appears to be that passengers are on a ship whilst cargo is in a ship (and even then not always). I have therefor made what I've marked as a minor edit. As this is a page of an important historic figure, which has been the subject of some shenanigans in the past, I thought it important to document. Adagio67 (talk) 09:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  in the Jupiter or on the Jupiter