lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Priam

message: I removed the claims by talk and talk because they were dubious and ambiguous/redundant, respectively.Mimson 21:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priam's Matrimony 

message: Instead of according to greek mythology shouldn't it say, according to Homer??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.186.254.98 (talk) 11:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   According to 

message: someone told me that he is mentioned in the bible can anyone confirm or deny this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.100.147.93 (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible 

message: This article contains two conflicting statements regarding the origin of Priam's name:
"Modern scholars derive his name from the Luwian compound Priimuua, which means "exceptionally courageous".[1]"....AND
"After this, Podarces changed his name to Priam. This is an etymology based on priatos "ransomed"; the actual etymology of the name is probably not Greek, but perhaps Lydian in origin."
Which is correct?Lily20 (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Etymologies 

message: The prologue to the Prose Edda talks about Thor being a grandson of Priam and going on to found the Scandinavian royal houses. Is there anyone with sufficient knowledge of genealogy who could integrate the Eddic version of Priam's family tree with the Geoffrey of Monmouth-derived one presented here?Nick xylas (talk) 11:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prose Edda 

message: Benjamin Britten's opera 'King Priam' ought to be mentioned. Valetude (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture 

message: The article needs to better distinguish between material coming from different historical layers of sources. (Where it cites Virgil, for instance, it should distinguish between things probably invented by Virgil and others that he may have borrowed from older literature available to him.) As for the family tree (Template:Trojan race), on the other hand, it is hardly possible to do so without discussing it in its own article. Currently, the tree is completely unsourced but obviously based in parts on comparatively late sources, not only Virgil but even Geoffrey of Monmouth. I would suggest removing it from the article but will paste it in the talk page, below. --Hegvald (talk) 09:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family tree 

message: 1. The article says Podarces is the established epithet of Achilles in the Iliad. I don't understand this. If Podarces is the king's actual name why should it be the epithet of the warrior?
2. When Priam pleads for his son's body to Achilles he actually speaks in the plural so he says "I put my lips to the hands of the man who killed my sons". Achilles did not only slay Hector but many of his brothers.
3. Where in the Iliad in Book XXIV is mentioned that nobody will fight for 9 days and that fighting will resume after 12 days? Note that the days were 11 until the 4 May 2015‎ when somebody with IP 71.90.137.160 changed the number to 9.
ICE77 (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epithet, plural and number
Talk:Juan de Garay

message: I removed the following text:
*"In 1574 he participated of the foundation of San Salvador, on the Uruguay river, and was appointed Lieutenant Governor and Capitan General of the United Provinces of River Plate."
because I coudln't find any place called san salvador founded by Garay on the Uruguay River, and because the United Provinces of River Plate didn't exist until the 19th century. Mariano(t/c) 07:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The placed was called "Zaratina del San Salvador" at the mouth of the San Salvador River in modern Uruguay, near present-day Dolores (Uruguay). The "city" was founded in 1574 by Ortiz de Zarate, and Garay was part of the expedition. The place was planned as the capital for "Nueva Vizcaya" (New Biscay), but it was abandoned in 1576. This is explained in more detail in the Spanish Wiki-page. It could also be included here, but it is a minor part of the story of Garay.Nordisk varg (talk) 19:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed paragraph
Talk:ShotCode

message: The ShotCode image in this article does not direct to the article as the image info suggests.
--67.160.66.72 (talk) 18:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Reema Sen

message: I think it may be useful to differentiate between reema and raima sen. most search engines mix them up as well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raima_Sen Runehawk 20:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name mixup
Talk:Sue Lawley

message: Material removed in line with Wikipedia:Verifiability. Philip Cross 19:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any connection or association between this subject and the Susan Lawley record label run by the power electronics band Whitehouse? Even if there is not, unless there is a more notable Susan Lawley, it should be mentioned in this article that she is not the record label's namesake. Fp cassini (talk) 15:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Also there maybe should be a connection with the Police's So Lonely/Sue Lawley.  The mondegreen is mentioned on that page. Stevebritgimp (talk) 13:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Susan Lawley record label
Talk:Airlift (logistics)

message: Seems a little absurd to call an article "Airlift (logistics)" and then change the term to "Food-Drop" and describe that. Even the link was screwed up by it. IMO delete this whole stub and start again.BTW--what does transporting televisions have to do with "food-drop"?--Buckboard 07:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Los Angeles Air Force Base

message: Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:  The location given is across the street.  The actual coordinates should be:  33.915203, -118375561
*
Coordinates fixed since above entry. BrainMarble (talk) 00:44, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 
Talk:Paul Rabinow

message: * Please state why this professor is important, eg. list some publications, use some outside sources, etc.  If you do this, it won't be tagged for deletion like it was.  Wickethewok 07:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be fine now, but I just want to say that Rabinow is one of the most well-known anthropologists in the US at the moment, and his books are widely read by scholars in many disciplines. --Fastfission 16:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I restructured the article a little bit and added to references for information in the article.  So I removed the "lack of sources" tag.  If I was in error in doing so, I apologize.--Markisgreen 21:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of unreferenced tag 

message: Are you sure he is notable enough for such sections to be appropriate? Samantha of Cardyke 15:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life, Marriage and children
Talk:Concurrent majority

message: what about Lani Guinier?  didn't she mine Calhoun's ideas here, with her "super majorities"?  obviously she and like-minded African-Americans may not want to acknowledge a debt to Calhoun, a slaveowner and a defender of slavery, etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18A:8101:2029:69A5:1289:A282:778C (talk) 18:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about Lani Guinier?
Talk:Eglon

message: I removed the sentence "This use of the word does not appear in the Bible" from the last bullet in this article because if it's only a word in Modern Hebrew then by definition it's usage is not found in the Bible because then it would be Biblical Hebrew, so it is redundant to say it is not found in the Bible and its a Modern Hebrew word. רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 17:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy
Talk:Mary Scheer

message: There are two birth years given, 1963 and 1967. Anyone know which is correct? thx1138 08:03, 12 
---MXC---
WOuldn't MXC be considered an actual acting role, as opposed to an appearance? I mean, she's been  on there since the start of the series. Tenspeeder 00:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I edited this text from the section on Scheer's MADtv tenure...
Whereas Sullivan and Wilson tended to play outrageously strange and funny characters, Scheer, in contrast, tended to seek humor by playing the straight and mature motherly roles.  Despite her tendencies, Scheer did develop some very memorable characters like chain smoker Mrs. Jewel Barone, Cabana Chat host Dixie Wetsworth, Connie Linder, Debbie Dander, Lily Don, and Mrs. Vigor (Killer Grandma).April 2006 (UTC)
...for the following reason:  Anyone who's seen MADtv would know that chainsmoking Jewel Barone, Dixie Wetsworth and Killer Grandma are not "straight and motherly roles".  Geez. Kinkyturnip (talk) 02:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unless your mother is a chain-smoking killer cougar, these are not "straight and motherly roles"

message: Reliable sources are needed before any edit to change the name (yet again) to Harvey-Scheer is made.  The repeated change is already the subject of a complaint from the subject ()  and compliance with WP:BLP is required on this topic. Nthep (talk) 12:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Great Sejm

message: Would it make sense to retitle this article, "Sejm Wielki," to "Great Sejm"?  That is what the Polish name means, and no other sejm has been called that.
As noted above, the Great Sejm was mentioned in the April 12, 2006, Main Page "Did you know" section — as "Great Sejm".  logologist|Talk 06:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support the move (this is en-wiki), and get rid of "".--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 13:47, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Great'' Sejm

message: In the "1791-1792" section, try to clarify the phrase "Russian adherents".
Also, the following sentence says "the Sejm met with only 182 members present, about a third of its 'dual' number". Yet the first sentence of the preceding section ("1789-1790") says there were 181 deputies, joined by another 171. So 182 members meeting should be about half, not a third, of its dual number.
Otherwise, a fine article. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:54, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments from B-class review 
Talk:Operation Most III

message: 15th-16th April 1944  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.176.213 (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm fine with it.radek 22:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems absurd. Operation Most III was but an episode of various actions of the Home Army aimed at solving the riddle of the Wunderwaffe. So, in other words, such a merger would be like merging the article on London to Camden Town. //Halibutt 01:35, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: But in Polish. Some pictures maps and info
http://www.tarnow.pl/historia/taka/v2.php
80.176.209.6 16:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: According to the article in PL:WP Operation Most I landed at the here mentioned airfield near Lublin. But Operation Most II and III at a field near Wał-Ruda in a completely different region.
Near Wał-Ruda is also the memorial stone to this operation → 50°7'56.18", 20°46'34.12". --Хрюша 21:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Localisation
Talk:Caroline Todd (Green Wing)

message: Does anyone know what type of Volvo Caroline drives? ISD 09:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caroline's Volvo 

message: This is perhaps the worst written article I have ever seen! If I wanted to know everything about this character, I would watch the series. It's truly incredible how the writer manages to describe exactly what Caroline has done for the entire duration of the show, but without any conception of grammatical nuance. This article is written as though it was being related in a pub to a very simple-minded friend, with no idea of the outside world. Why, for example, are there links to the pages for 'weddings', 'poker', 'cat', and 'badminton'? We all know what these are, and this just shows how little this has been thought through! I want to weep...
I have improved the article for you. I removed the unused links and improved the grammar. ISD 08:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a little note 
Talk:Battle of Brownstown

message: It seems a shame that so many people are interested in changing the adjective and adverbs, in deciding whether this was a noble battle or not, a victory or not, a military coup or a serious mistake, and yet so few take note of the "stub" classification, and try to flesh out the article. 
I realize that online resources are few, and there's not nearly as much to be said about this minor skirmish as might be said about, say, the invasion of Normandy on D-Day. Still, it'd be nice if you tried - or even if you simply added citations. ClairSamoht 07:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV wars

message: I put the coordinates where the historic marker is, which is a distance from the high school mentioned in the text.  The road crosses Brownstown Creek near the high school, I grant that, but there must be a reason the state put the marker where they did.  GeorgeofOrange (talk) 01:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:The Librarian: Quest for the Spear

message: I did a few language tweaks for clarity (such as noting that TNT is specifically American) and accuracy (it's not a "film released" [insert date], it's a film that WAS released [insert date], for instance), added some links to other Wikipedia pages (such as headhunters, Mayan and tongue-in-cheek), and updated it a little here and there, but I couldn't do much as far as updates, because I really need to know: does anybody have any clue whether or not "The Librarian 2" is in (or finished with) production yet? I can't seem to come up with any good sources for it that date past June or July of 2005, which is arguably rather out of date seeing as it's about 10-11 months past that now. I think we need verification on the current status of the sequel film, and badly, in order for this page to be accurate. 63.21.87.193 08:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The sequel is out now.  Can anyone verify the trilogy mentioned in the article?  -Elizabennet 21:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the following sentence: "For some odd reason it is the most expensive of all three films to purchase."  First, it has an informal, non-encyclopedic tone.  And second, I don't think it's relevant to an encyclopedia in the first place.  Although the statement happens to be true (I was looking to buy it when I stumbled onto the page) and I can offer speculation why (oldest of the three, few produced) it's nothing that can be cited or is even particularly relevant to an encyclopedia. Ojchase (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD Pricing 
Talk:West Contra Costa Unified School District

message: The West Contra Costa Unified School District was the first school district in California to even consider defying state requirements that high school seniors class 2006 and beyond take the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE).  It was to have students with otherwise passing grade point averages (GPAs) that failed the exit exam still be able to graduate with a diploma, which would have been illegal since the exam is mandatory under state law.  By a vote of 4 to 1, the district dismissed plans to do so, and is now, along with many other school districts, going to issue certificates to those "graduates" instead, with words explaining that the students have fulfilled their requirements with the exception of the exit exam.
Link to Contra Costa Times news article (may expire in the future) (edit: yup, it did --Geopgeop 11:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Exit Exam

message: * Support.  They appear to be two articles about the same subject.  --Elonka 21:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Category talk:Nero Wolfe

message: The discussion in the main article also indicates the  need for a Robert Goldsborough books category, and it shouldn't prove difficult if someone has the time! Modus Vivendi 08:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Paul A 04:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

text: ...and then I got kind of carried away, and split the Stout books into novels and novella collections, and then... (I hope I haven't stepped on anybody's toes.) --Paul A 05:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Famine response

message: *http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,1607,7-153-10370_12150_12220-26946--,00.html
Lantoka 08:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  resources for continuing this article 

message: "Thus, after about 40 to 50 days of starvation, the loss of body protein affects the function of important organs, and death results, even if there are still fat reserves left unused. (In a leaner person, the fat reserves are depleted earlier, the protein depletion occurs sooner, and therefore death occurs sooner.)"
I've been fasting since June 25, or 36 days, and feel fine.  It's hard to imagine I've only got 4-14 days to live!  (I'm 5' 7" and weighed about 170 pounds when I started.  About a week ago, I weighed 140, and I suspect I weigh about 135 now.  Since I started, I've taken only water, salt, three or four multivitamin tablets, and a few non-caloric foods, such as curry powder, tea, coffee, diet sodas, raw garlic, mustard, etc. -- except for four "indiscretions": two small cans of kippered herring, two cans of ravioli during the second week, and occasionally small amounts of non-dairy creamer in my tea and coffee.)  So far, my health has improved greatly.  I've gotten over a ten-year case of chronic dermatitis, various digestive problems have gone away, and mentally, I feel content, calm, and clear-headed.  I realize that my experience is anecdotal, but 40-50 days still seems rather brief to me.  I remember reading somewhere that people have gone for six months without food.
D021317c 10:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  40-50 days? 

message: This entire article reeks of original research. Not a single citation, but very specific claims about human metabolism. FironDraak (talk) 10:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: I concur that "Famine response" should be merged with Starvation mode. They are about the same subject. Starvation mode is the better title as with "Famine response" many unrelated items come up in searches. 220.101 talk\Contribs 08:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree 87.194.220.146 (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE this article into Starvation mode
Talk:Ibn Jubayr

message: Inaccurately deemed a "philosopher" page.  Changed to bio.  A picture/map of travels would add a lot to this article as well.--Aeranis 07:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Status as philosopher

message: Does anyone know when he passed through it? He says he spent four days their.--Aa2-2004 (talk) 11:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mosul 

message: I have not found a good source for the biographical information in the article and have had to rely on the article by Pellat in the Encyclopaedia of Islam. This does not provide inline citations to the primary literature. Googling suggests that there may be uncertainty in where and when he was born –  Jativa in 1144 and Valencia in 1145 are mentioned. - Aa77zz (talk) 07:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For example, Google snippet view of Vol 1 of Maurice Gaudefroy-Demombynes 1949 translation has: "Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad Ibn Jubayr Maurice Gaudefroy-Demombynes. Hjstef v ... Jobaïr (1), naquit à Valence, ou peut-être à Xativa, le 10 du mois de rabi' 1/540 (1er septembre 1145) ou, selon d'autres auteurs, en 539."  See here. Unfortunately Broadhurst 1952, which I have, gives almost no biographical information. - Aa77zz (talk) 07:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical info 
Talk:Loan-to-value

message: Sure, merge it with loans, but don't change the hyperlinks to simply "loan"-to-value. I think we should leave "loan-to-value" for the sake of the lowest common denominator; those that will see simply "loan" highlighted in the mortgage article's history section, or wherever else this term may occur, and suppose that there is no specific "loan-to-value" definition, just loan; the LCD being those that think they already know what a loan is and bypass the link: resulting in a dumber public. Let's not let Wikipedia be generalized, please; there's no point. 
On another note, HELOC should link to an existing article, or an invite to write it if one doesn't exist.
--It should also be under the search "LTV" as this is the common abbreviation used for loan-to-value.
I think "loan-to-value" should maintain an independent existence from "loan."  LTV is a concept that only has meaning in secured lending - if there's a merge to be done, it should be into that.
-->>There are a whole bunch of pages out there in wiki explaining LTV (or LVR), all of them should be merged into one, there are something like 3 sepeate articles.
* I think it is a worthwhile topic and recommend leaving it. At a minimum keep the name and redirect to the subtitle explaining LTV in loan. Finance topics are poorly documented so far in Wikipedia.  As they come around this article will be increasingly referred to. Deet 21:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I would be in favor of keeping it separate. The term is a widely used term with a meaning and a use that goes beyond the scope of "banking" and is used in all varieties of secured lending. However, if there's other pages that discuss LTV or LVR or LTC then they should be combined into this one. I'm also going to make a disamb page because apparently LTV already exists as a redirect to something else. --Laxrulz777 19:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)