Talk:Saw (2003 film)

message: Is it right that this is called "2003 film" but included in the category 2004 films (together with Saw itself) ?  -- Beardo 03:00, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: If this was a 9.5 minute 2003 film, than how is the following sentence possible?
It was created from a scene that they chose from the script of Saw (2004).
 The Dude 4 16:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand how you don't understand that sentence. It's a film that's nine in a half minutes long [9.5], and it was released in the year 2003. ARBlackwood 08:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. Saw was made into a 2004 film after the short was made.--CyberGhostface 18:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Does This Mean? 

message: Are these titles a pun on:
 seen,  scene,  seesaw,
as well as  hacksaw,  hack??
< http://akas.imdb.com/title/tt0387564 >;
< http://akas.imdb.com/title/tt0495241 >.
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 02:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not a pun on anything. I believe the title came from the hacksaws Lawrence and Adam had in the 2004 film, but I could be wrong. It's definitely not a pun though. GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are these titles a [[ pun ]] on: 

message: :Image:Jigsawpuppet.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Jigsawpuppet.JPG

message: This is a little ridiculous, but the discussion for merge, which can be found here, has been going on for a little over a year now, and I am the only one to contribute to the discussion in that whole time. I don't wish to break policy, but since the article has vastly improved since its merge nomination, I feel it is a "Keeper" article, and the merge discussion should end. Agreements? GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 18:58, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the article is too big to merge into the Saw franchise article, IMO.  KEEP. --Mike Allen talk · contribs 04:54, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: the paralized victum was credited as "Body"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.121.194 (talk) 19:28, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paralized Victum