Talk:Jacob Neusner

message: Well we are back.  Thanks to everyone who helped cool down the rhetoric.  I hope that it lasts. Guedalia D'Montenegro 05:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks

message: I have had the article now full protected so that we can discuss the merits of the material being added or subtracted.  Further, I will be archiving the entire contents of this talk page tomorrow and preparing to copy the current article minus what I interpret as NPOV to a sandbox within my user space. In general, what will happen is as follows:
# I'll archive the talk page so that the discussion starts fresh and everyone understand where we are with the article.
# I'll move the current article to a sandbox in my userspace, weed out what I believe to be outside of a neutral point of view, and provide a link at the Mediation Cabal case page (link above).
# Each editor will then be invited to make an edit and then explain that edit on the Mediation Cabal case page.
I recommend that any users who do not have a user account register at their earliest possible convenience to make this process a little easier on everyone involved.
I should have everything in place by tomorrow at this time.  Thanks for your time. CQJ 05:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Full protection

message: After a review of the article, I've decided that the entire thing needs a rewrite.  There was a great expanse of weasel words and other miscellaneous verbage, so I think we just need to start over again.  
The sandbox page is located at User:CQJ/sandbox.  There is a detailed procedure for editing the page shown at the case page, which is Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-08-20 Jacob Neusner article.  For now, we'll take the discussion there.  In addition, this page has been archived to facilitate discussion if necessary.  Thanks for your time. CQJ 03:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would appear that no one's touched the sandbox page as of yet.  I'll keep it open, however, but if there's not any action in a few days here, I'll probably have the page semi-protected and see if that does anything. CQJ 18:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

text: If that's the way you feel, then I'll have the article unlocked and close your Mediation Cabal request as such. CQJ 13:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Sandbox

message: I have removed this unsourced negative material in acordance with WP:BLP.  If it is well-known, there will be a reliable source.  If there is no reliable source, it can not be in the article.  GRBerry 20:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material removed under [[WP:BLP]] 

message: I think the criticism section is by now well established and documented.  Please do not remove without discussion.Guedalia D'Montenegro 03:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Here we go again

message: While making a routine edit (putting back reference to Leiberman's article) Somehow the latter half of the entry is not displaying.  I hope it isn't something I did.  The text appears int he edit section - just not when saved.  Can anyone help.  Also can anyone tell me what I did to make this happen - and hopefully avoid it in the future.  Thanks Guedalia D'Montenegro (talk) 15:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it - sorry for the confusion.Guedalia D'Montenegro (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HELP

message: I am no expert on this fellow, but the top of the article has no citations, and ought to be so tagged. It reads like a promotional biography. Further the page needs BLP tag, but I have no idea how to do that, so I shall just complain and hope you more competitant people can make the change. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 06:37, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Puffery