Talk:Bronzino

message: Bronzino is the name by which every educated person knows Agnolo di Cosimo. The affectation of a supposed "correctness' in order to appear more knowledgeable than we are is a commonplace of  pretentious behavior. --Wetman 05:12, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's a list of works here (Catholic Encyclopedia). JASpencer 11:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Works

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support as nom (see previous discussion above also) Johnbod 14:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support as nom (see previous discussion above also) Johnbod 14:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: :When attempting to display strong emotion, his Mannerism becomes unconvincing, verging on Academic art.
The allusion to Academic art (as, apparently, some degenerate form of art) is uncalled for, being inherently POV. In addition, the following statement contradicts the above, as you will see:
:Bronzino's skill with the nude was better deployed in the celebrated Venus, Cupid, Folly and Time, which conveys strong feelings of eroticism under the pretext of a moralizing allegory. 
The old woman at left is is certainly rather emotional, as are the two figures at top to a lesser degree. And yet this painting is mentioned right after the "unconvincing" statement. I will remove this if no one expresses objection. --Vlmastra 01:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced, Contradictory, POV Statement 

message: I know a little bit about Bronzino, so I took some liberties with my edits, but certainly hope I didn't step on anyone's toes!  I agree with Vlmastra that there are some inconsistencies with the use of the term "mannered," which is probably just due to the instability of the label itself (see for example the classic critical essay by John Sherman "Maniera as an Aesthetic Ideal," 1963).  If it's going to be used as a yardstick against which to measure Bronzino's success or failure, then it really ought to be defined here.  This is doubly the case as I don't think there's any evidence that Bronzino saw himself as working in a "mannerist" style - this is a later categorical system.  Thus I removed some of that language, until such a time that the original author (? or someone) could clarify it.
I'm also removing the reference to this mystery painting Resurrection of the Virgin Mary because I'm not sure which one it is... In other words, if it exists, it's so obscure that finding an image of it is almost impossible.  If someone has an image of it, that would be great and really helpful to understanding the larger point.  Also, maybe if the argument is that this work betrays a 'moral crisis,' then a further explanation (as to how and where we see this crisis in the painting) would be lovely.  Ummm, some new content - I do wonder about that Dante painting supposedly in the NGA, D.C. because it's not listed on the website and very seldom referenced in publication.  Perhaps not accepted as a Bronzino work?  Is there some provenance issue with it?  Strange - well, maybe that bit should be removed; if anyone knows something about it, I'd love to hear!  Thanks! Isocephaly (talk) 20:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mannered," etc.  

message: I've recently uploaded 19 new images of works by Brozino at :commons:Category:Google Art Project works by Agnolo Bronzino. Please have a look and use any that are useful. Dcoetzee 06:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New images from Google Art Project 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bronzino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111104002744/http://www.palazzostrozzi.org/SezioneBronzino.jsp?titolo=Dell%27arte+e+delle+cipolle%3A+Omaggio+al+Bronzino+by+Bruce+Adolphe&idSezione=771 to http://www.palazzostrozzi.org/SezioneBronzino.jsp?titolo=Dell'arte+e+delle+cipolle%3A+Omaggio+al+Bronzino+by+Bruce+Adolphe&idSezione=771
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bronzino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100214070257/http://www.turismo.intoscana.it/intoscana2/export/TurismoRTen/sito-TurismoRTen/Contenuti/Attivita/visualizza_asset.html_2066122814.html to http://www.turismo.intoscana.it/intoscana2/export/TurismoRTen/sito-TurismoRTen/Contenuti/Attivita/visualizza_asset.html_2066122814.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified