lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mindarie Senior College

message: "Mindarie Senior College (MSC) caters to the needs of our young adult learners so that they can take the next important steps in their life. MSC's primary goal is to move students to increasing independence where they understand appreciate and accept responsibility for the choices they make and in doing so, make the most of their opportunities. As mature young adults, MSC students will be able to develop the ability to establish and maintain complex and supportive relationships within a network of friends and supporters."
Appears to have been written as promotional material and/or copied from the school's website (unable to confirm). Bozzio (talk) 11:58, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed section
Talk:Padbury Senior High School

message: Can somebody get us a 2009/2010 projected student population. additionally, a number of employees would be useful. Mod.torrentrealm 09:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting an update 
Talk:Mandatory reporting

message: Very obvious -- the useful parts of this stub needs to be merged into Mandated reporter, which is a much more substantial article. This article could comprise a section relative to Australia. Cgingold 03:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I didn't feel that there was sufficient material to warrant a separate section on mandatory reporting in Australia, I strongly agreed that there was useful parts to be merged, so I have done so. --Lox (t,c) 22:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge request
Talk:Rothmund–Thomson syndrome

message: I've redirected Rothmund-Thompson%27s_syndrome to this page. It may help the quality of this article to incorporate some of the information from that page over to this one. All of the information I've seen on the net implies that this is the proper spelling, such as This gene clinics profile Kazriko 03:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: Not mentioned in article. Is it a synonym? 86.130.41.222 (talk) 13:33, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "erythrokeratoderma" redirect here?
Talk:Anonymizer (company)

message: Anonymizer was recently bought by Abraxas Corporation. Abraxas Corporation a leading provider of risk mitigation technologies for the U.S national security community. 
Anonymizer Press Releases
Streetinsider Press Releases AbrahamLincoln24 (talk) 00:51, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymizer Inc bought by Abraxas Corporation 

message: Since being acquired by Abraxas, Abraxas was sold to Cubic Corporation.
As part of that deal, Ntrepid Corp was spun out as an independent company and took with it a number of technologies, including the entire Anonymizer service.
Neither Ntrepid nor Abraxas, nor Anonymizer have any owner / subsidiary, or sister company relationship to Trapwire.
The cited articles are highly dubious.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.26.177 (talk) 14:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company ownership and related companies. 

message: The current President (or CEO) of the company is Mark Yturrdale, which I know from my own first-hand experience.
Thoughts on how to reference this?
R3troSim (talk) 12:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current President/CEO 

message: Article says Anonymizer's website is https://www.anonymizer.com/ , but that forwards to ntrepidcorp.com . Is Anonymizer defunct?? --EarthFurst (talk) 06:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  defunct?
Talk:Mitamaya

message: Much of the article is taken from the German one.  As my knowledge of German is minimal, of Shintoism is negligible, and machine translation is terrible, can someone who knows a bit more of the first two help?
Thanks so much, Yodaat 03:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Tamaya capitalised?  Yodaat 04:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: "In Kyushu as well as in a few other places, they build a small hut on the burial lot, and call it tamaya (soul-hut). This seems to be a survival of the moya (mourning hut) referred to in the ancient literature. In Tsushima and some other isolated islands, they used to build mourning-huts near the grave and the bereaved families were supposed to remain there until the expiration of  their mourning periods." from .  Yodaat 04:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this it? 

message: From https://www.w3.org/Amaya/User/FAQ.html#1.9
(emphasis added by Ed.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A62:14AC:7E01:40A3:A10E:C0A9:BD (talk) 15:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation?
Talk:Warrego Highway

message: Recently I was pleasantly surprised, and transported back to my childhood, when my Navman GPS informed me I was entering the "Toll Bar" as I started to descend the Toowoomba Range. I had thought that the term had been abandoned by all mapping systems many years ago. This event inspired me to add a section on the "Toll Bar" to the article. Downsize43 (talk) 00:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: An editor has seen fit to change "The term "The Toll Bar" is widely used by locals to describe the current road" to "The term "The Toll Bar" is sometimes used by locals to describe the current road". As this is a matter of perception, and possibly related to the age group and background of the individual editor, I seek the opinion of others to establish whether there is any consensus on the most appropriate text. Downsize43 (talk) 10:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Toll Bar"
Talk:Fenestratus

message: Added more info about fish Raab.Em (talk) 00:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bobby Orlando

message: I think that "I'm So Hot For You" was sampled from Kratfwerk's Das Model, 1978, just listening makes it clear: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQIYEPe6DWY
Also this is the same sample used by Junior Jack's Da Hype (2003)
--Legolas558 (talk) 21:48, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "I'm So Hot For You" sampled from Kraftwerk 

message: This article reads as very promotional and not at all NPOV. An editor with experience in that area needs to look at it. 173.77.205.66 (talk) 05:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Tone
Talk:Nekogigi

message: I suggest adding this picture: https://fishbase.mnhn.fr/photos/PicturesSummary.php?ID=6191&what=species
I do not know the procedure and code for adding a CC picture to Wikipedia. But this picture has an easier-to-see fish since it's bright yellow. It's a yellow fish with what looks like a smiley face, which is pretty neat. 137.70.12.60 (talk) 20:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another picture, may be better
Talk:Western Freeway, Brisbane

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Park Ridge Transit

message: This article is also suported by wikiproject translink wikipedia:translink mattythebatty (talk) 10:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Hi,
When i get time i will be adding photos from the gallery that i run about this bus company, Park Ridge Transit Gallery  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt037291 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos,
Talk:Sacred Cenote

message: A number of references are listed by author last name and date in the notes without title or any other information either in the notes or eference section.156.98.252.252 (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the information in this article allegedly has been taken from broad sources, Sharer and Traxler's The Ancient Maya and Sabloff's The New Archaeology and the Ancient Maya. These are very generic books covering the breadth of Maya archaeology and are inappropriate for an article on such a specific subject. In addition, whoever wrote much of this article included no specific page numbers and at least as far as my checking is concerned, the information does not reflect the sources (although I am willing to be proved wrong). CoyoteMan31 (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References lacking 

message: There have been numerous changes to this page since the last time I took a stab at it in 2017. It hasn't really gotten better. El Cid has made good faith edits and corrected my correction, namely that an airlift is, in fact, a dredge. The history of the later explorations of the Cenote Sagrado are somewhat complex, which is why I never wanted to fully edit this page. But here we are.
The Mexican government approved an exploration of the Cenote Sagrado in 1954 by an organization of Mexican divers, CEDAM (Club de Exploraciones y Deportes Acauticos de Mexico). A team of divers worked in the Cenote Sagrado but found nothing because of poor visibility. 
The head of CEDAM, Pablo Bush Romero, persisted, and in 1959 supposedly convinced Mexico to agree to a new project with the National Geographic Society. Bush Romero learned of a device called an airlift that had been used to explore Port Royal in Jamaica. He arranged for the hire of the person in charge of that expedition, Norman Scott. The two of them convinced Mexico's agency in charge of archaeology, INAH, to employ the airlift in the Cenote Sagrado. In late 1961, Scott's team used an airlift but Mexico shut down the project early after four months claiming the airlift was damaging the artifacts it brought to the surface.
Bush Romero made one more try and managed to convince INAH to permit a third exploration in 1967, once again employing Norman Scott. No airlift was used.
Since then there have been several smaller projects by Mexican authorities in the Cenote Sagrado, most recently by the Gran Acuifera Maya Project.
This is a long way of saying I understand why there is a need to state there were later explorations into the Cenote Sagrado, but why is it important to make special note of the airlift dredge?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoyoteMan31 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Dredge or not to Dredge, that is the question
Talk:Ultra lounge

message: Please do not delete this page or others like it! I didn't know what an ultra lounge was, so I checked my first quick reference, Wikipedia. Now I know, and I'm glad.
These leads to a larger issue of various of Wikipedia's policies - in this case, the "orphan" policy ... I think it needs a serious rethinking. Just because something doesn't have links doesn't make it unimportant. In defense 03:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Another issue is that "Ultralounge" also appears to be music genre related to Space age pop, or at least music related to Lounge music. Actually Ultralounge is a trademark of Capitol records. They use it to describe their tradition lounge music releases, such as Cole Porter, etc. __meco 09:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

text: This article isn't actually orphaned anymore - it's linked from Nightclub.  --WayneMokane (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Different things

message: For some reason this page tries to cover both the music venue and the Capitol Records compilation series at one time.  This may be because the article was developed before the separate article on the Ultra-Lounge series was developed.  For this reason, I have deleted the "see also" references and put one of the "About" italic redirect definers in the top to redirect people to the Ultra-Lounge page.  Sorry that my edit is unmarked; my keyboard is not working properly and because of that I managed to upload the changes before I was finished with the explanation of the changes I performed. Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 19:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ultra Lounge vs. Ultra-Lounge
Talk:Camp Hero State Park

message: Montauk Air Force Station was a SAGE radar site, many of which have WikiPedia pages (see Category:SAGE sites).  Creating a seperate page for just this topic seems appropriate.  Please comment or provide other guidance.  Conrad T. Pino 04:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montauk Air Force Station 

message: Yes, none of the recent infobox templates in this article have been appropriate.  How about this one?  Jim.henderson 01:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Consistent with my "Article focus problem" proposal (see below), I support this proposal. Conrad T. Pino 03:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but having seen your Mill Valley AFB article, I'm inclined to abandon my own proposal and make this article strictly a military one with a military name and the military structure infobox template.  It already has only a section at the end about post military use, and no great reason to add to it.  Incidentally, I am familiar with both places, having kin a few miles from each, though I haven't been in California since the MV base was demilitarized, though I climbed cliffs and stared at the bunkers in Camp Hero last summer.  Much more interesting to do, than write about.  Jim.henderson 03:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider the risk that capturing the military history won't be completed as locating sources is difficult and interest often wanes.  I believe future relevancy lies with it's new use.  Before leaving please document what you learned during your site visits on the talk page and I'll help integrate that into the article. Conrad T. Pino 17:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Park Infobox

message: I've changed the acreage from the previously reported 415 acres to 754 acres. The old acreage figure can be sourced to the park's official webpage, however, the updated figure comes from a NYS statistical manual (p. 671, p. 9 of the .pdf) published by the Rockefeller Institute of Government, which I have used to supply acreage and basic location information for nearly all New York state parks articles. I am using it here for consistency with other articles. It has also been my observation that acreages (when reported) on NYSP webpages do not appear to be pulling from a consistent source, or are inconsistently rounded, etc. Typically the difference in reported acreages between sources is small, however as this one is quite large I am writing this note to make anyone curious aware of the discrepancy. (My theory is that the smaller figure does not account for underwater acreage, or does not include areas not accessible to the public, but that's just a guess.) Antepenultimate (talk) 00:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acreage
Talk:Northern Busway, Brisbane

message: According to TransLink's network maps and website the Inner Northern Busway is now known as the Northern Busway, and the article should reflect that. Gezzza (talk) 03:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: It is probably best to update our pages with a merge to reflect these name changes. - Shiftchange (talk) 04:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Support per Shiftchange. Sb617  (Talk) 05:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion 

message: The article is confusing in that it discusses both the Northern Busway and bus routes that use the Northern Busway. The article's Route map implies the busway starts at the Cultural Centre. According to the text "Northern Busway starts in a tunnel underneath Albert Street in the city centre adjacent to the Queen Street bus station".
According to Translink's Busway map at http://www.translink.com.au/resources/travel-information/maps/101213_busway-and-train-network.jpg the Northern Busway starts at King George Square station.
I suggest the article be updated so that the text and route map show the Northern Busway starting at King George Square station.
Neddy53 (talk) 11:04, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route discussion
Talk:Inner Northern Busway, Brisbane

message: I propose that the name of this article be changed to Inner Northern Busway, Brisbane. I've searched TransLink documents both online and hard copy and can not for the life of me find a single hyphen between the words Inner and Northern. The Brisbane Times and The Courier-Mail also do not use the hyphen. --TripleThree (talk) 01:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. And no-one has objected in 7 months. Name changed. -- Starbois (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed name change
Talk:Holland Park West busway station

message: Errr, is 'kiss'in'ride' meant to be 'park'n'ride'?58.7.248.168 (talk) 07:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lol 
Talk:Harbour Town bus station

message: The park'n'ride option at Harbour town has been prohibited by the Harbour town management. They enforce this with a sign, security patrolling and actively monitoring number plates and commuter activities. Tow trucks have been called on occasion.
M@  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.234.206.186 (talk) 00:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Royal Bliss

message: Royal Bliss was formerly working under this relatively small label. The Killers also have released work (a vinyl of Hot Fuss) under this label. We should mention this former label in the article. Sancho 04:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Control Group]] 

message: Devil With Angel Eyes and Hard & Loud both charted, but I do not know the chart positions to enter them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rutzr84 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart Positions missing 

message: I don't know Royal Bliss well enough to make the edit boldly, but this is a great article to mention that Neal is the voice of the song "I Do" from The Piano Guys' Jon Schmidt.  Heck, just find a way to re-record it, either as Royal Bliss or as Piano Guys featuring Royal Bliss.  It seems like a huge win for both teams, whether as an album track, a youtube video, or just permission to sing it at your concerts to those who weren't around when it was the hottest wedding song, or better yet, those who remember it with powerful and loyal nostalgia. (And please holler if you do, just so I know something came of my suggestion!)--Mrcolj (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Do 

message: If there is any truth to David singing with Royal Bliss, are there any recordings/videos? Rpulcino (talk) 17:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Lee Roth?!
Talk:Glaser Safety Slug

message: It not the photo this is the drawn picture, and it may not correspond to a reality. About errors write, I will correct. Talifero n (talk) 19:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Early references to the Safety Slug, such as the 1975 LEAA police ammo test  refer to it being manufactured by Deadeye Associates. Presumably, this was the original name of the company, before Glaser. The September/October edition of American Handgunner ran an article "Handgun Stopping Power"  that similarly referred to Deadeye Associates as maker of the Safety Slug. It would be a good addition to the article to include the early company history, if any can be located.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ana Nim (talk • contribs) 19:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deadeye Associates 

message: I see no source or review cited with claims that this ammo is inaccurate at greater distances, as stated in the "Performance" section. I added a "citation needed" tag to that. Also this a "pre-fragmented" round not a "frangible" round; I do see that the website called GlobalSecuirty (not a publication by the way), classifies Glaser as frangible, but that is not an accurate classification. Frangible ammo disintegrates upon impact with hard targets., that is the basis for its definition, as frangible ammo is safe to use on hard targets. This ammo has never done this against metal/hard targets, though it ls less likely to ricochet due to impacts deforming the ammo more easily.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.75.147.243 (talk) 23:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims about inaccuracy 

message: I have seen it said that Glasers are only issued to the Police in America.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.48.174.102 (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police 

message: I read the article but I did not see a discussion of why its called a safety slug. Perhaps that should be discussed in the opening paragraph.
As far as I know, all bullets are dangerous and not safe. That's why you are not supposed to point a loaded gun at anything you are not willing to destroy.
Jeffrey Walton  (talk) 03:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is called safety slug because it is intended to pose far less risks to everyone but the target. BP OMowe (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is it called a safety slug?
Talk:Last of the Romans

message: I believe I have seen him referred to as "the last of the Romans". Can anyone verify? Srnec 04:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Gregory the Great]]

message: I've changed the reference in the introduction from Marcus Junius Brutus to Marcus Junius Brutus the Elder as this is clearly the person Caesar was referring to. 87.66.182.254 (talk) 00:21, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Marcus Iunius Brutus]]

message: Francis II and Charles V should be added b/c the former was the last Holy Roman Emperor at all, and the latter the last to be crowned as pope. They were the last to hold the title of Roman Emperor, no matter how formal, and recognized as such.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.40.128.86 (talk) 01:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  The "Holy Roman Empire" was neither a continuation of, nor a successor state to, the Roman Empire.  AuH2ORepublican (talk) 02:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There is plenty of historical evidence for the Holy Roman Empire being seen as a continuation or successor to the Roman Empire, by at least some of its contemporaries. However, a citation would be needed to support the idea that Charles V or Francis II are "Last of the Romans", as this is a rather specific title. Rauisuchian (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: In a more literal sense
Talk:Mangrove rivulus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 20:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Luana S. F. Lins et al, Whole-genome sequencing reveals the extent of heterozygosity in a preferentially self-fertilizing hermaphroditic vertebrate, Genome (2017). DOI: 10.1139/gen-2017-0188  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.129.128.7 (talk) 17:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexpected genetic diversity
Talk:Masters of Science Fiction

message: The first four episodes aired in Canada at roughly the same time as they did in the US, though I don't have the exact dates. (anyone?)  The second run of this series in Canada is scheduled to include the final two episodes, so the 'first aired' dates for those two are correct, but it will be the second airing of the first four.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.64.248.51 (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks!  I can't wait to steal..... er, watch them on the internet.  ;-)  -  Theaveng (talk) 17:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Canadian air-dates 