lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Emergency evacuation

message: Changed the tone of the article to be more neutral.  Removed instructional/how-to portions.  Added more linkages.  It's a much better page now.
EM student, so quasi-expert.
Mcmillen76 (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up the entire page 

message: Cut entire subsection:
----
====Lack of transportation====
If a person doesn\'t have a car, they generally have no way to evacuate.  In New Orleans, the poorest neighborhoods were traditionally at the lowest elevations.  This meant that those who were the least likely to have a car, and were therefore unable to leave, were also the least likely to be able to weather the flooding in their homes.
----
What does "no way to evacuate" and "unable to leave" mean? Were there no trains or buses out of New Orleans? Or were the fares too high? --Uncle Ed 16:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor people in New Orleans

message: If a person doesn\'t have a car, they generally have no way to evacuate.  In New Orleans, the poorest neighborhoods were traditionally at the lowest elevations.  This meant that those who were the least likely to have a car, and were therefore unable to leave, were also the least likely to be able to weather the flooding in their homes.
----
What does "no way to evacuate" and "unable to leave" mean? Were there no trains or buses out of New Orleans? Or were the fares too high? --Uncle Ed 16:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of transportation

message: Explaining that poverty of minorities is the cause of Experience, Traffic and "Limited Social Capital" is not the aim of this article. --Daveblack 01:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: removing "poverty" as a reason for not fleeing town
Talk:Work It Out (Beyoncé song)

message: It says that the song charted on a few Billboard component charts but none are sourced or listed. Bubbling under and dance charts are not components to anything: one is an "extension" to the main chart and the other is a genre chart. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 18:54, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Component charts 
Talk:Tubalars

message: Wouldn't it be better to give the article the name Tubalar: it looks like a Turkic plural, i.e. a disignation of the whole people, and not of a single representative. No English -s is required. (Perhaps, I'm wrong with this idea...)--Imz 23:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call it ''Tubalar''? 
Talk:Jezebel

message: Kanye west mentions her in his new album. really popular guy, it should be inside the pop culture section (I'm new sorry if I did this wrong)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.96.54.171 (talk) 22:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Only a small fraction of popular references can be given in the space available.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:4E9F:D101:F9AC:EA23:F272:2977 (talk) 14:36, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular culture
Talk:List of people from Quincy, Illinois

message: John Wood, founder and 12th governor of Illinois  - founder or what?  Illinois?  And why is this list not in alphabetical order?  User:Zoe|(talk) 23:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: John Wood founded Quincy 75.23.94.6 20:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

message: All due respect, but fictional persons should not be held to the same standards of notability as living persons. Very few fictional people hold Wikipedia articles, but it doesn't make them any less notable to be included here. Marlene from The Last of Us should be included. The source was also valid. I do enough editting on Wikipedia to know what is exactly notable or not. (Tigerghost (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: From Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline#Notable people: "To be included in a list of notable people, individuals must still meet the notability requirements per WP:PEOPLE." The stated criterion for these types of lists is for people who were "born or have lived" in said place. Fictional people can't meet this criterion. Additionally, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections also applies here in that any trivia about Quincy, like a notable book using it as a setting, should be incorporated into the prose of the main article and not put into list form. However, before you choose this route for inclusion, make sure you have reliable non-local sources discussing the use of the town setting as a main focus of the article. --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 05:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, technically, this whole article is "trivial." So if you or anyone else wants to be that strict about it then the article itself should probably be deleted, as for all list of people from places. (Tigerghost (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry you feel that way. Trivia and trivial are two different concepts on Wikipedia. This article is neither trivia, nor trivial. If you feel that it is trivia or trivial, you may submit your request to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. However, before you do, I strongly encourage you to re-read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 03:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional 
Talk:River Stour, Dorset

message: Hello all. I have added citations, headed sections and done some tidying. can someone review for upgrade from stub-class? Thanks. The joy of all things (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've upped it to a C-class...Jokulhlaup (talk) 09:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ta!Regards.The joy of all things (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update class?
Talk:Think and Grow Rich

message: There is a lot of controversy around Hill's life, work, and book. 
For example, there is a reasonable argument that he did not actually interview the people he claimed he did. https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2016/12/the-untold-story-of-napoleon-hill-the-greatest-self-help-scammer-of-all-time/
To simply present (a very abridged version of) the content and not to put it in context is, I think, misleading. 
I personally feel that the content (ideas) in the book are fine, but there are huge question marks over whether Hill actually was who he said he was, and if he did what he said he did. I think most likely not. The article should address this squarely. 
Lauchlanmack (talk) 03:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Are we supposed to accept gizmodo as an authority? Is it a credible source? Looking through it one finds very few references or citations that one could look up to verify what they have stated.24.139.24.163 (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What alternatives are you offering? --Hipal (talk) 20:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article doesn't address the various controversies around the books' origins 

message: Index 103.58.155.229 (talk) 10:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Think and Grow Rich
Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links/2006-03-26 dump

message: So as not to appear to be dropping them completely, I'm putting there here.  The following two comments were added to the list under "Indo-European" as I was working.
*was based on a faulty naming scheme (e.g. not OK with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (plurals)) and a dubious dab scheme - all of that currently rearranged in these three pages: Indo-European (disambiguation), Indo-European people and Indo-European language --Francis Schonken 14:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Indo-European

message: *Links should be fixed on all pages (user, talk etc), right? Deizio 22:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To quote Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links, "Talk:", "User:", and "Wikipedia:" administrative pages do not necessarily need to be fixed. Dpv 23:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice one. Good job I was holding off on those ones. Deizio 23:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not to say that you can't fix them - it's just not necessary. -- Natalya 01:27, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dumb question 

message: Re: pages linking to the Motif disambiguation, there are many instances of the word "motif" being used where "theme" would be more accurate, particularly in literature-related entries.  Should those be sent to Motif (literature) as the closest match?
There's also somewhat of a gray area in other uses, particularly in film and game entries.  Depending upon usage (imagery vs. storytelling), there are places where "theme" would also seem more appropriate.  However, a case could also be made for Motif (literature) or Motif (art) (the latter of which is a one-line entry) on a case-by-case basis.  I did my best with ~10 entries before stopping.  I don't want to make more work for other Wikipedians.  Some help and discussion would be greatly appreciated.  —PaperTruths 03:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cross-posted to the main project talk page, where I originally meant to put this. (Duh.) —PaperTruths 03:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If a link to theme is more appropriate than a link to motif (literature), there's nothing wrong with piping the link to theme. -- Natalya 16:27, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Motif
Talk:Raconteur

message: This has been recommended to be moved to Wiktionary before, and it appears that Wiktionary already includes raconteur.  So really I think this article should be deleted, but I wasn't sure of the best way for that to happen.  – BryanD 23:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't we add the story for the term, not just the definition? --eipipuz 17:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History behind Raconteur 

message: Went to a bio, saw subject described as raconteur, no wiki-link, entered it into search, got entry on Storytelling. Wha???
Nowhere in that entry does the word raconteur appear; not a hint of it or what it means. Looked around, felt like an idiot trying to buy a Zune in an Apple store, thought "bugger this for a lark" and went to google. That was hours ago, because while at google i found a better bio and clicked from there. Only came back here because I had promised myself I would.  
I know most likely no one will ever see this, but come on! Wikipedia has got to be better than this!!
How can a word re-direct to a page that doesn't explain it? that doesn't even include it in the entire text? Snozzwanger (talk) 04:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  define: quandry
Talk:Fayzulla Xoʻjayev

message: It really would have been better had this article been left at Faizullah Khojaev. The previous transliteration Fayzulla Khodzhayev was both cumbersome and inaccurate. "y" transliterates "ы" from cyrillic, not "й" (and even then only in Russian). There is no reason to reproduce the Russian 'dzh' construction for "ج", when the latin alphabet contains a perfectly decent "j". Sikandarji 23:27, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The title would be Fayzulla Xo'jayev, as in Uzbek, and there's no reason to transliterate it from Russian (?; WTF is russian doing here?). As we do not transliterate Turkish or Finnish names from Russian or Ukrainian, instead of writing them as they're written in Turkish or Finnish.--Abdullais4u 06:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It isn't transliterated from Russian - if it were it would be "Faizulla Khodzhayev". It's a simple latinised version which will be easily comprehensible to English-speakers, which is what we should always aim for in Wikipedia. The New Uzbek latin transcription is much too unfamiliar - no-one would realise what the apostrophe was supposed to indicate, or that "X" in Uzbek is pronounced "Kh" - it has a different sound in English. Sikandarji 08:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Title

message: Although Faizullah Khojaev was founder of Uzbekistan but he was Tajik not Ozbek .National-Administrative Divisions: Establishment of the Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic of Tajikistan within Uzbekistan Farvartish (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality
Talk:A (Cyrillic)

message: Why was the image of the letter in the early cyrillic alphabet
 It was originally(azǔ) in the Early Cyrillic alphabet and it had a numerical value of 1.
removed?--Hhielscher 11:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: None of the other letter pages have the image like that and that image shows it wasn't that much different.  If one wants to see how the glagolitic alphabet appeared at one time, there's a place on wikipedia for that.  Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 21:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it wasn't that much different From a typographic point of view it differs a lot.--Hhielscher 17:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Really?  it looks exactly like а.  Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 22:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History is important 

message: What is you name of this letter. Is it called different things in the countries/languages that use  use Cyrillic?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.111.37 (talk) 04:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is just "A". Names of Cyrillic vowels are identical to their pronunciations. And no, to my knowledge, it's the same in all languages. At least in Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian. - Sikon (talk) 06:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Can somebody make a page about A with Circumflex (Cyrillic)? 139.193.232.104 (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A with circumflex (Cyrillic)
Talk:Jason Behr

message: As per Manual of Style wp:mosbio, please don't refer to Behr as Jason in this article.24.85.68.231 (talk) 07:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behr not Jason 

message: Under filmography Senseless incorrectly links to a David Spade comedy of the same name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.195.134.19 (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong movie 
Talk:Gujarat Sabha

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Requested move was submitted without a proper rationale. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jalen Folf (talk) 05:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Gujarat Sabha →  – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. 2409:40D6:16:238B:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 January 2024 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Opened by a sock, and no substantiative reasons given to move.  – robertsky (talk) 14:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Gujarat Sabha →  – All the information given in this article is about Gujarat Kshatriya Sabha.  Only Gujarat Kshatriya Sabha is written in the entire article 2409:40D6:1017:55D9:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 03:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject India has been notified of this discussion. Killarnee (talk) 21:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 February 2024
Talk:C6H12O6

message: I must disagree with the addition of the DAB page April 11, 2006.  Glucose is ONE of the eight hexoses (16 if your count the D and L isomers... even more if you count the ketohexoses), so the creation of a DAB page in this case actually further ambiguates the subject... no matter whether you're a chemist (as I am) or a biochemist... all of the hexoses are mere stereoisomers of each other.  While I agree that glucose is certainly the MOST common of the hexoses, it certainly is not the only definition.  I prefer the original redirect to hexose, so I'm changing it back, but if there is disagreement, please post on this talk page and we'll discuss.  -- C. S. Joiner (talk) 23:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, since it was me who created the DAB page and you make a good point. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 18:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Roosevelt University

message: Chicago Music College Merged with Roosevelt University in 1954.
It was a long time ago but in the 1800's it was a important college in old Chicago.
A section on this should be added...
See:  Chicago Musical College
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Musical_College  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BC77:4CC0:315A:1C38:33F3:4F74 (talk) 08:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicago Music College
Talk:Ulf the Quarrelsome

message: It says on the page regarding Brodir of the Isle of Man that he was hung.  Does anyone know whether he was tortured as described in this article or hung?
:This page is based solely on the accounts in Njals saga. The article about Brodir seems to relate more to accounts from other sources. I'm quite sure nobody living knows how Brodir really died, but the story in Njals saga seems exaggurated, and is probably inspired by biblical accounts of the death of Judas the traitor. Finnrind 19:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Darth Vader in The Empire Strikes Back.jpg

message: Based on this page, especially this image, the picture is ACTUALLY from Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back, not A New Hope. Notice the two buttons on the right of Vader's chest box are blue and red, not green and red. --Addict 2006 19:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actually from Empire Strikes Back
Talk:Mark 39 nuclear bomb

message: Several sites mention this weapon in the incident on 1961-01-24 (see List of military nuclear accidents) with a yield of 24MT, although the article has the yield at “only” 3.8MT. Is this correct? --Oneiros 00:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yield 

message: See discussion at Talk:1961_Goldsboro_B-52_crash#The_switch --Pawyilee (talk) 07:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The switch 

message: Would a photo of the Mark 39 replica at the Air Force Museum be helpful to the article? Craigbucher (talk) 21:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:Bobby Henderson (Flying Spaghetti Monster)

message: There are already two articles dealing with the Flying Spaghetti Monster and Henderson's book. This page contains no original content, so I have redirected it. Shoehorn 00:15, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Two years later and I still see no evidence that Mr. Henderson is notable by Wikipedia standards, yet this article was restored. I have restored the redirect. Shoehorn (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Grapette

message: sorry, the article is almost there it needs some citations. At the moment the article is more about Grapette in the US. Develope the Latin America details, this was why the product as able to be revived in the US.  Gnangarra 03:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When you are ready to renominate drop me a note and I'll come back to review Gnangarra 03:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Four occupations (East Asia)

message: This article is free-floating in time, it requires references to other articles and outside sources to know what time period is being discussed. A few dates would be helpful. Halfelven (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Punishment and Power in the Making of Modern Japan" by Daniel V. Botsman.  Princeton University Press.  chapter 3 (there may be more) has some discussoin on shi no ko sho.  Available on google books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.254.134 (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: Perhaps this article should be merged with Feudal Japan hierarchy. This other article represents Japanese society during the same period as this article as having only two social classes and then mentions merchants as a sort of aside. It has been marked for copy-edit and needs a lot of work. Fixing it is going to make it very similar to this article. Therefore, I'm proposing they be merged. Orange43 (talk) 00:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: These should not be merged.  They are based on similar characters, but maybe treated differently in different countries. Benjwong (talk) 04:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I propose this article be merged with Four occupations. (In fact, given how superior that article is, I think we should just merge the edit history from here, redirect, and scrap most of the content.) — LlywelynII 15:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[Four occupations]]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Fadix

message: I was not really aware of this RfC and found out about it accidentally. I was not going to make any input to it, but when I saw Fadix’s comment “When someone mislead others about the content of my edits, I call this to be a lie” I decided to add my view of the situation. Fadix has virtually been stalking me for a few days, following me to every page that I contributed to and accusing me of POV pushing no matter what I said and done. Moreover, in the Talk:History of Azerbaijan he started a personal attack on me, even though I wasn’t a major contributor to the article and my input was only fighting vandalism on that page. I don’t really understand what was the point of mentioning my name there. On Iranian Azerbaijan talk page he’s gone as far as saying “I haven't read every crap (as we are now, I guess with all the POV pushing you've been doing, I can from this day on consider those crap) you've been introducing. I just got interested in the article History of Azerbaijan, and the first paragraphs were already tainted by the sort of crap you've been spewing”. As I said before, I wasn’t even a contributor to the aforementioned article History of Azerbaijan. See , he’s behavior was very uncivil and he made numerous personal attacks on me. This behavior continued on Talk:Nakhichevan page, where I started an RfC by the proposal of the admin Golbez in order to decide with the help of the community on the principles of inclusion of foreign names to the article. Fadix immediately accused me of POV pushing, even though the idea of RfC was not mine. He was even pointed out by one of outside viewers, Aucaman that nothing justified such a harsh response and there was no need to personalize the issue. Overall, my every discussion with Fadix starts with him accusing me of POV pushing, no matter what I say or what sources I cite. As I understand, in his view I must always concur with him, otherwise I’m a “dishonest POV pusher”. Grandmaster 17:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grandmaster
Talk:Production engineer

message: In quite a few years of involvement with technical theatre in the UK (mostly non-professional, but I have worked as house technician in theatres which receive small-scale touring professional shows) I have never come across this term, and if I heard it I would not immediately connect it with sound. 
I wonder if it is limited to (eg) large professional musicals? If so, it should say so. (I know there's a note that in smaller shows it may be called 'sound operator', but that is buried in the text). 
In any case, the article has no references. ColinFine 09:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context