Talk:Alliant Techsystems

message: The article (as of 5 Set 2012) mentions that "ATK Launch Systems" is the division that Thiokol became in 2006 ("the sole manufacturer of the reusable Solid Rocket Motor used to launch the NASA Space Shuttle, which will be adapted to the Space Launch System."), but fails to mention that division later in the article, in the article section Major divisions later in the article.  In that section, 
"ATK Aerospace Systems", "ATK Missile Products", and "ATK Security and Sporting" are all listed as divisions.  And that fails to get at yet another division, not mentioned in the article—the "ATK Space Division" in Beltsville[, Maryland] ... born out of the old Swales Aerospace.  ATK acquired [Swales] in 2007, and we are the satellite side of the ATK business, and we build satellites for commercial, civil, international, and defense programs."—quote taken from this interview on The Space Show, on 17 Aug 2012, (at c. 1:35 in the interview).  
:So the division claims in the article are a mess; definitely incomplete and outdated.  Anyone have a good source that would clarify all of them?  N2e (talk) 23:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I attempted to change "Major Divisions" to Business Units, listing the business divisions below that.  The hope was that the ATK corporate website is up to date.  Otherwise someone can revert my changes and spend a couple days on the phone.  Assuming the people you call even understand what are managements' latest reorganizations whims. And regarding "ATK Launch Systems", how does one handle discussions of such things when company divisions are always in flux? "namedAsOf" or some similar tag?? AndreQ (talk) 17:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The company's divisions are a mess 

message: I am a consultant employed by ATK. I want to follow the rules here, so I am posting this disclosure. I don't want to damage the article in anyway or inadvertently break any rules, so I am going to post on this talk page for the time being when I have a substantial edit to make. Singaporebobby (talk) 12:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I made this edit myself on the advice of another editor I queried. I marked the edit as COI in my edit summary. Singaporebobby (talk) 20:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, I am no longer employed by ATK. I do enjoy contributing here though and will do so as my time allows.Singaporebobby (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI disclosure 

message: I would like to add the following text on the Orion space capsule to the section on ATK Aerospace:
===Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle===
The Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle is a spacecraft intended to carry a crew of up to four astronauts to destinations beyond-low Earth orbit. Currently under development by NASA, for launch on the Space Launch System, Orion will facilitate human exploration of the Moon, asteroids and Mars.
ATK developed the launch abort motor that sits on top of the Orion capsule. This device would push the capsule and its crew away from the rocket in the event of major fault on the launch pad or during descent. ATK also developed numerous composite parts that provide heat protection for Orion. 
Singaporebobby (talk) 20:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orion 

message: The Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle is a spacecraft intended to carry a crew of up to four astronauts to destinations beyond-low Earth orbit. Currently under development by NASA, for launch on the Space Launch System, Orion will facilitate human exploration of the Moon, asteroids and Mars.
ATK developed the launch abort motor that sits on top of the Orion capsule. This device would push the capsule and its crew away from the rocket in the event of major fault on the launch pad or during descent. ATK also developed numerous composite parts that provide heat protection for Orion. 
Singaporebobby (talk) 20:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle

message: On February 10th Orbital's merger with ATK will close and Vista Outdoor will be spun off as an independent company. I plan to rename this article to something like "Orbital ATK" and create a new article for Vista Outdoor. What do you think? Singaporebobby (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds fine, but you should probably leave a good part of what's there now, which is pretty short, minus the bulleted list of product lines, for historical purposes. Hopefully the Vista Outdoors article could say something more, otherwise it's barely worth having an article. Overall, there's not much to write about a holding company. Rezin (talk) 17:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

text: Thanks for your response! Please take a look at my sandbox. I am in the process of digging up more research to make sure that the Vista Outdoor article has "meat." Singaporebobby (talk) 23:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. It's borrowed meat, but that's the best that can be expected of an article on a holding company. Rezin (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I will post today under Vista Outdoor Inc. Please feel free to edit away.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Singaporebobby (talk • contribs) 12:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the article for Vista Outdoor. I don't want to move forward on Orbital and ATK without input from other editors, as the situation with those two articles is not nearly as simple as Vista. Does anyone have any ideas about how to move forward? Thanks! Singaporebobby (talk) 13:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I would vote for keeping "Alliant Techsystems" and "Orbital Sciences Corporation" as historical articles, and then starting a new "Orbital ATK" page. Both component companies were notable for many years, and this would be consistent with the way Wikipedia has covered other aerospace mergers such as Lockheed Martin = Lockheed Corporation + Martin Marietta. I'll leave a note at the Orbital talk page to let them know about this discussion. Brian the Editor (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: agree with --Wuerzele (talk) 04:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

text: I agree as well that both company's history (and their Wikipedia's pages) is sufficiently rich that they should be kept for historical purposes.  This is true especially since this was a "merger of equals" (company's language, not mine), and not an acquisition.  It is not clear which page should be modified if one of the two pages needed to be "upgraded" to the new Orbital ATK.  I've edited the Orbital Sciences page to capture the fact that the company ceased to exist and to link to the new Orbital ATK page. Spaceman13 (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger and spinoff 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Alliant Techsystems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140212082937/http://www.atk.com/corporate-overview/history/ to http://www.atk.com/corporate-overview/history/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I understand that ATK was the company's stock symbol.  Did they simply adopt the stock symbol as an abbreviation for the company name, even though the K doesn't really stand for anything?  75.163.201.188 (talk) 15:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the "K" stand for in ATK? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Alliant Techsystems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.orbitalatk.com/news-room/atk-announces-plan-to-create-two-independent,-publicly-traded-companies-committed-to-leadership-in-outdoor-sports-and-aeros
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150212082021/http://www.orbitalatk.com/news-room/orbital-atk-marks-first-day-of-operations-following-completion-of-merger to http://www.orbitalatk.com/news-room/orbital-atk-marks-first-day-of-operations-following-completion-of-merger
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131913474000/http://www.astronautix.com/engines/gem40.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/engines/gem40.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130623150446/https://www.reuters.com/article/2009/01/21/idUS152956%2B21-Jan-2009%2BPRN20090121 to https://www.reuters.com/article/2009/01/21/idUS152956+21-Jan-2009+PRN20090121
*Added  tag to http://defensenews.com/story.php?F=2793630&C=america
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928133016/http://www.nwfdailynews.com/share/profiles/?slid=52836bbc-64ad-c2d4-9dae-291a895b67d1&plckController=PersonaBlog&plckScript=personaScript&plckElementId=personaDest&plckPersonaPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3A52836bbc-64ad-c2d4-9dae-291a895b67d1Post%3A4d252120-6dcd-4132-b823-23038489868d&sid=sitelife.nwfdailynews.com to http://www.nwfdailynews.com/share/profiles/?slid=52836bbc-64ad-c2d4-9dae-291a895b67d1&plckController=PersonaBlog&plckScript=personaScript&plckElementId=personaDest&plckPersonaPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3a52836bbc-64ad-c2d4-9dae-291a895b67d1Post%3a4d252120-6dcd-4132-b823-23038489868d&sid=sitelife.nwfdailynews.com
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130719192202/http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2012armaments/Wednesday14027hart.pdf to http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2012armaments/Wednesday14027hart.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Why does the term "Allied Technologies" redirect to this article? There is no mention of this term in the article. If that was a former/alternative name for this company, shouldn't it be mentioned? FBitterlich (talk) 12:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from "Allied Technologies"