lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Navy Office (Germany)

message: This article had to be totally reviewed. There is no linkage between the old Reichsmarineamt and the modern Marineamt besides the name. While the old RMA was a part of the government, similar to a ministry of the navy, the modern MA is a specialised naval command at a subordinate level.
Also there was a number of mistakes in the old article. First of all, the name Kaiserliche Marine disappeared in 1919, then there was the Reichsmarine and finally in 1935 the Kriegsmarine. The Treaty of Versailles did not reduce the RMA but the Navy. The RMA was dissolved in 1919 and there was a new Ministry of the Reichswehr (the German armed forces as a whole) with a navy department in it, the Marineleitung. 
This means that the article was basically beyond repair, and I highly recommend to write a new article "Reichsmarineamt" only after much more thoroughly researching the subject.--KuK 11:34, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I have seen the term "Marineamt" used in documents from 1918.
82.229.209.33 18:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Existed in 1918

message: Some IP keeps adding information about the alleged training of elite reserve lieutenants in its' cadre training units WA33 and 34. The IP claims to have been there. Therefore, here is some background:
* WA33 and 34 stands for enlisted personnel ratings like SE11 for seamen and WAXX for different weapons specialists. This designator system is out of use for decades and has never been used for officers. 
* Nowadays the enlisted combat divers, similar to UK SBS or US SEALS, and the clearance divers both carry the designator 34. 
* The training of theses people is mainly conducted in the Fleet and not within the responsibility of the Marineamt with exemption of some general courses.
* Given the enormous efforts to train these specialists no reserve officers or other reserve personnel are admitted to this kind of training. 
Possibly this has been different in the very remote past (prior to 1970s) but nowadays there is neither training nor responsibility for the Marineamt. So my appeal to the IP is to stop reverting without presenting more evidence to his information. He could do so also in German or on my page in the German IP and with German sources. I am willing to assist translating them if they help to clear this case,--KuK (talk) 15:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Elite Lieutenants"
Talk:Daniel Schneidermann

message: Robert 00:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 
Talk:History of the World Wide Web

message: I'm gonna be making some additions. Just leaving some notes...
* Gopher vs Web
* SHTTP vs HTTPS...
* Portal wars, search wars, browser wars
* CGI, SOAP, REST, XmlHttpRequest...
* Java, XML and Adobe Flash vs HTML5
* LAMP to MERN
* Mobile web
* Great Firewall of China and BATX companies
Sean Brunnock (talk) 12:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: [This comment was edited to remove a personal attack]
Following the introduction of the Web, several media formats based on discrete cosine transform (DCT) were introduced for practical media distribution and streaming over the Web, including the MPEG video format in 1991 and the JPEG image format in 1992
This is completely false.  — Sean Brunnock (talk) 10:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments by Brunnock 

message: Life is short always be rich 2402:8100:26E6:AB82:60E8:7739:9D9F:2F4B (talk) 13:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duniyaa ka amir insan banta hai
Talk:Vancouver School Board

message: I used to love using Wikipedia for information on VSB schools, as it had more info than the district's own website. I just clicked on a few schools and the pages now redirect to this page, but there isn't any info. Have they all been slated for deletion? Some of them had decent write-ups and more info than you can find in one place elsewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.149.136 (talk) 08:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What has happened to the school pages? 

message: I propose that Sir James Douglas Elementary School be merged/redirected to this article, as per the usual procedure for elementary schools at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. --MelanieN (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one has objected, I will carry out the merge/redirect. --MelanieN (talk) 23:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger proposal 

message: I feel like this page would be served well with a separate page to list schools. Something like This  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NyanPsyche (talk • contribs) 03:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not enough information to support such a split, as per WP:SIZESPLIT. —Joeyconnick (talk) 07:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate page for list of schools? 
Talk:Kryvyi Rih Metrotram

message: Since the metrotram is partially underground, can it be considered a light metro and not light rail? It says so on the Ukrainian wiki page...
Doc Dimaus (talk) 17:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Here, in English Wikipedia, we follow WP:reliable sources. Do the sources call it a "light metro"? Vanjagenije (talk) 21:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Light metro

message: Kiev also has one but I guess it is not Metro tram since it is fully above the ground and partially intergrated in the city's tram system, rather than the Metro system. As such, it should be part of the Kiev tram article, we'll write at some point and not the Kiev Metro Tram or, if a separate article is written, it would be Kiev Speedy Tram. Am I right? --Irpen 04:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Template talk:Metros in FSU, where me and DDima agreed to take it one step further. --Kuban Cossack  11:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Швидкісний Tрамвай

message: I renamed article to "Metrotram", because this word is in use anywhere (in article, at Schwandl's website, in Russian literature - I don't know about Ukranian but don't see any reason to name differently), and not two words "Metro Tram". --AndyVolykhov 19:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Lopon Tsechu

message: was one of the greatest masters of Tibetan Buddhism is too subjective. Was he widely regarded as such? And by whom -- just his followers or Tinetan Buddhists generally? Billlion 11:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks fine to me now.Billlion 09:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  nice to see a cordial collaborationBadabara (talk) 22:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?

message: One more question: Why remove "Rinpoche" from Lopon Tsechu Rinpoche's name? Other lamas such as Thrangu Rinpoche and Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso Rinpoche have their "Rinpoche" title in their Wikis? Can I reinstate this? If so, how?
Thanks Vajraspanner
:First of all pleas read . I had a similar situation over my article about Akong Rinpoche. Have a look at the history, it was agreed we had to change it to a redirect to Akong. I didn't much like that but it seems to be the consensus. But at the moment this article is screwed up as the redirect is to the incorrectly named article. Please ask an admin to fix it. No doubt the other articles where the Rinpoche is in the main article not the redirect are just there because noone has got around to fixing them. Billlion 09:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: relating to redirect, when I did a search for "Tsechu Rinpoche" there wasn't one, so I did a redirect this to this page. I searched Popes and Rinpoches, and it appears both "Pope" and "Rinpoche" appear in the page titles. What would make the most sense is for this page, and all related pages redirect to "Lopon Tsechu Rinpoche". Should we request a redirect with admin?Badabara (talk) 03:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to Move
Talk:Tryavna Peak

message: I don't know how to use your system. I just want to point out that the link at the end "reference map" is dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.108.146.66 (talk) 03:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thanks. Apcbg (talk) 04:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link
Talk:Black Crown

message: Can anyone give a source for  the quote by the Shamarpa? Billlion
The source for the quote is:
Kagyu Life International, No.1, 1994
Copyright ©1994 Diamond Way Buddhist Centers USA 
It can be found online at: 
* Buddhism Today Magazine Website
Please can it be reinstated? Vajraspanner
:Sure go ahead and put it back in as a quote with the source cited. Try to find a NPOV way to put it. Is there some quote from the rival faction about the Black Crown? One way to handle this kind of situation is to say what both sides of the contoversy say about something. Billlion 10:45, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for Shamarpa quote?
Talk:Mzaar Kfardebian

message: :The use of the citation tags is correct. All material must be attributed to a reliable source, preferably with inline citations. WP:CITE is the relevant style guideline. Marasmusine (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand your point. There is another page for Faraya, the village: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraya
Bangabandhu (talk) 02:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Kubitzki system

message: There is until now 7 volumes: Vol. 1 Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms (1990), Vol. 2: Angiosperms: Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid Families (1993), Vol.3:Lilianae except Orchidaceae (1998),Vol. 4:Alismatanae to Commelinanae (except Gramineae)(1998), Vol.5: Capparales, Malvales and Non - betalain Caryophyllales, (2002) Vol. 6: Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales (2004) and Vol.7: Lamiales (except Acanthaceae including Avicenniaceae)(2004). Berton 14:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kubitzki (in Kubitzki, K.(Editor)(1998): The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol.3, Preface)says: "When Rolf Dahlgren and I embarked on preparing this book series, Rolf took prime responsability for monocotyledons, which had interested him for a long time. After finishing his comparative study and family classification of the monocots, he devoted much energy to the acquisition and editing of family treatments for the present series. After his untimely death, Peter Goldblatt, who had worked with him, continued to handle further incoming monocot manuscripts until, in the early 1990s, his other obligations no longer allowed him to continue. At that time, some 30 manuscripts in various states of perfection had accumulated, which seemed to form a solid basis for a speedy completion of the FGVP monocots; with exception of the grasses and orchids which would appear in separate volumes. I felt a strong obligation to do everything to help in publishing the manuscripts that had been put into our hands. I finally decided to take charge of them personally, although during my life as a botanist I had never seriously been interest in monocots". Berton 11:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:National Association for Chiropractic Medicine

message: Excellent! AED, please contact me by email. -- Fyslee 12:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am trying to figure out why you wrote "Excellent!" above. Who are you responding to? Thanks   Steth 04:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: AED created the article, and it needed to be done, hence my comment. Similar articles need to be created for the other chiropractic organizations. -- Fyslee 12:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good start 

message: I have removed a reference to a source that is unreliable for a number of reasons:
a. The author is pseudonymous ("Anthony di Fabio" is the pen name of a science fiction writer). Thus it fails WP:V.
b. It contains blatant advocacy of Scientology's Suppressive Person Doctrine. Thus it is advocacy and propaganda.
c. The author openly states "I have not verified most of the materials referenced." Thus it fails WP:RS.
The reference was obviously inserted in the article as a negative POV attack on the NACM, and no regard for whether it was true seems to be in evidence. We aren't in the business of simply repeating attacks here. This is not tabloid journalism. -- Fyslee/talk 07:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source removed 

message: In 2002 the Journal of Controversial Medical Claims published a paper submitted by the NACM entitled "NACM and its argument with mainstream chiropractic health care."Mirtz TA, Long P, Dinehart A. Slaughter RL, DuVall Jr., CE, Bryson R, Kourmadas F. Campo J. NACM and its argument with mainstream chiropractic health care. Journal of Controversial Medical Claims, 2002;9(1):11-25. (Article summary)
* The references from the article
Brangifer (talk) 22:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article from Journal of Controversial Medicine 
Talk:Koonung Secondary College

message: Looking at recent edits to this article, it seems that much relevant information has been removed, questionable information left, and slightly irrelevant information added. Whilst detail in some areas was probably not necessary, surely it would've been better to remove that detail or split the article up with more headings or something, rather than remove large blocks of interesting and relevant information. Summary information was also removed, by the looks of it.
Additionally, what appeared to be a NPOV complaint was noted at the bottom of the page, and not in the correct format. There was no discussion started, but I applied a correct template anyway so that should someone actually decide to open discussion on the subject, they may. :)
I have to ask that any future major changes - and a possible overall improvement to the article - be discussed here.
--Evan C 12:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reckless editing? 

message: Here are my suggestions to replace some removed information. They're more concise.
*In the introduction: The school aims to achieve excellence in all aspects, and to keep a respectable pulic image.
*In the uniform section: A "three strikes" system applies for uniform enforcement. This has proven somewhat effective in improving compliance.
Additionally, I believe the following sections should be restored with minor editing for brievity:
*Buildings
*The college is situated on a single campus.... (perhaps to be combined with the buildings section, into the existing facilities section).
If there're no arguments to that in the next week or so, I'll go ahead and add those.
--Evan C 07:26, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two new paragraphs, to replace removed info 

message: Is there still a POV debate going on? Why is the tag still there when noone commented on this page for more than a year now? Ubardak (talk) 02:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV debate 

message: I updated some of the dates and fixed a few grammatical errors.
I also updated the most recent musical from "Urinetown" to "Fame".
http://home.koonung.vic.edu.au/home/news/16june2.pdf
(sorry, I'm an editing newbie) Xewrch (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates
Talk:Wulfila Glacier

message: Who named the glacier, and why did he/she choose this name? Koro Neil (talk) 12:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The glacier was named by Bulgaria, apparently because of Wulfila's relation to that country's history explained in the name origins narrative given in the article and the cited source SCAR Composite Antarctic Gazetteer. Apcbg (talk) 12:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Yvon of the Yukon

message: Someone changed the King Louis link to Louis XVI of France. Do we actually know that this is the King Louis he is talking about? After all, there were a lot of them. --Horses In The Sky 12:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Louis XIV. There was an episode involving a trivia contest, and Yvon correctly identified King Louis's nickname as the "Sun King," which was Louis XIV's nickname. The Legend of Miyamoto 01:00, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: King Louis Link

message: Actually, Yvon's last name is Ducharme, and the town isnt Churchill, its Upper Mukluk —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Partapdua1 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectness 

message: I've upgraded the article from Stub to Start class.  It has been fleshed out more and now has two of the major sections required to stop being a stub: a synopsis and a character list. The intro and infobox have been fleshed out more, which is great.  For continued improvement, a production details, response section, and episode list are suggested, along with continuing to fill out the introduction to the point that the awards can go into the response section.  Also, if there are any DVD releases, a section on those would be good to have.  See the TV Manual of Style for help on potential suggestions and on additional information to add to the introduction.  AnmaFinotera (talk) 01:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The info box on the right hand side has been vandalized by someone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.158.48.71 (talk) 02:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Box Vandalized 
Talk:Simon Amstell

message: wrote, commentated and directed http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p04sh6zg/simon-amstell-carnage
Veryscarymary (talk) 22:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carnage~Fantastical Comedy 
Talk:Countess Eloise of Orange-Nassau

message: I object to this deletion due to the importance of this person: she is a full member of the Dutch Royal House and 6th person in the line of succession to the Dutch Throne. She is definitely not some sort of marginal person. Demophon (talk) 03:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to deletion
Talk:Count Claus-Casimir of Orange-Nassau

message: In the Netherlands, aristocrats with the rank of a count(ess) do have the prefix "hooggeboren heer/vrouwe" ("highborn lord/lady") and not "His Excellency".
The full name is:
Claus-Casimir Bernhard Marius Max van Oranje-Nassau van Amsberg.
The title and predicate are:
Count of Orange-Nassau, Jonkvrouwe van Amsberg.
The prefix is:
Highborn lord.
::I believe you mean "Jonkheer van Amsberg". After all, Count Claus-Casimir is a boy, not a girl ! 161.24.19.112 (talk) 12:28, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style of count Claus-Casimir 

message: As of April 30, 2013, Count Claus-Casimir is now longer a member of the Dutch Royal House. He is still , however, 6th in the line of succession to the Dutch throne, following his elder sister (who is 5th) and his father (4th). Please update the article.161.24.19.112 (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: done. fyi, you could have done that yourself. anyone can edit.Toyokuni3 (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Update
Talk:Melotron

message: .... This article looks like a damn press release! Project2501a 12:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation? 

message: I agree.  Maybe we should revert?? Sectryan 14:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Copyright Violation? 

message: Track 7 "Princess of Russia" is sung mostly in English.Spacedwarv 20:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only German Lyrics 

message: On the American late night show their song "Der Kosmonauts" is used in a certain part of the show. Is this worth mentioning?Spacedwarv 04:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added it, not sure what more to put though. It is only a short clip that is recognizable as Der Kosmonaut, but I cannot say much more.Spacedwarv 02:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saturday Night Live 

message: I think it could be incorporated somewhere near the top.  I was looking around on other artist's pages for references and I kept finding that many Wikipedians are moving away from the Trivia section.  But I believe it's worth mentioning somewhere in the article.Sectryan 20:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added it, not sure what more to put though. It is only a short clip that is recognizable as Der Kosmonaut, but I cannot say much more.Spacedwarv 02:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Saturday Night Live
Talk:Charles T. Pepper

message: I'm curious to whether this man actually existed or is a marketing ploy by Dr Pepper (or whatever umbrella organization it is under).  Someone with access to records at the UVA medical school should be able to confirm/deny his existence.  I'm going to do some research as well, and not the "original" kind.  UPDATE: found this site which seems to point to his non-existence -- Bubbachuck 13:02, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  For real? 

message: Ok I may not be familiar with all of Wikipedia's policies, but seriously, how in the heck do you cite that something didn't exist? --68.226.2.10 08:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-existent scientific evidence citation needed? 

message: Article received 6403 hits on the day it became a Did You Know. It has been entered into the July 2017 Hall of Fame statistics.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:04, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hall of Fame 

message: It is far from certain that Dr Pepper was named after Charles T. Pepper; as this article previously stated, “The origins of the soft drink name Dr Pepper is [sic] obscure.” I have made changes to the article (with additional citations) to reflect this uncertainty.—Quick and Dirty User Account (talk) 21:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncertainty 

message: This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems.  An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements.  Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page.  MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
Talk:Ed Miller (poker player)

message: I suspect Ed Miller himself or someone working for him wrote the original article considering it read like an advertisement and creating this article was the only edit ever made by the contributer. I have cleaned up the article a bit.
S Sepp 13:26, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: Every article Ed has written or has been written about Ed can't be listed as an external link.  Try to reference the articles he's written and the DVDs he's made in his bio without making it appear like spam.  If some of the articles written about him could be provided as a reference about him, then use them as such, but they don't belong as separately listed external links.  See WP:EL for clarification. Jauerback 16:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: The article describes him as a professional poker player, but gives no insight into his performance in that field--just the books he's written. Has he won any tournaments? Does he do well in limit games?? It also says that he works in New York City... where does he play this "professional" poker, then? Hermitage 14:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  poker achievements?