lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hitachi (Australian train)

message: six, six-carriage trains.
Someone at Connex blurted out the number '3' when referring to the number of Hitachis still in service a few days ago in some media source (maybe a newspaper, maybe a magazine like Newsrail). Am I dreaming? --Mcbridematt 20:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: six, six-carriage trains

message: I dispute the assertion that none of the Hitachi trains had air conditioning. I have travelled on Hitachi trains in which air conditioning was operating. IIRC, the air conditioning is located in a series of vertical vents running the length of the carriage, parallel to and adjacent to the lights. However, the air conditioning was largely ineffectual and this may be the reason it was rarely used.
It is possible that the air conditioning was not installed on all carraiges, or only a subset of them. Also it has been a long time since I last travelled on a Hitachi trains so it is possible my recollection is flawed. Nevertheless it would be worth looking into this. --B.d.mills 23:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air conditioning 

message: Until this "supposed" letter from Connex is posted in public (with their permission), the refurb details section has been removed. You are welcome to place it back if you post the verifiable text from those involved or otherwise confirmed in the media etc. --Mcbridematt 12:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refurbishment details 

message: Just a thought regarding this section. The convention for calling these trains "Hitachi trains" is a relatively recent one (until Comeng trains came in, they were known as "silver trains" and officially as "Stainless Steel trains" - see VicRail Power Parade, 1981). As it turns out, there are no Hitachi-supplied components, just electrical equipment supplied by Comeng, of Hitachi design. On this basis, it's probably a bit misleading to have a section that suggests they are a train "by Hitachi" and comparable to actual Hitachi-designed and built trains like the N700 Shinkansen. Perhaps it would be better to have a disambiguation page or have the information in this section in a separate list page?
Zzrbiker (talk) 04:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The 'other' stuff could go into the main Hitachi page. Wongm (talk) 06:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, trouble is that there's virtually nothing on the Hitachi page about Hitachi Rail. I'd almost consider a "See also" section with links to the N700 and Class 395 trains. Zzrbiker (talk) 05:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need an "other trains by Hitachi" section
Talk:Florida City, Florida

message: ?Coral Castle  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpyvvikky (talk • contribs) 15:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

message: Fascinating nobody has thought to include to-date Florida City's crime rate, which is an astronomically high 153 per 1,000 residents, one of the highest in the United States.
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/fl/florida-city/crime/#description
99.61.13.226 (talk) 20:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about Florida City's absymal crime rating? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Florida, Florida. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 12#Florida, Florida until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 05:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Florida, Florida" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Wikipedia talk:Peer review/Tikal the Echidna/archive1

message: This article is quite stable (except for one time) and has references, notes, and sources.  It has pictures, and it has enough information about the subject.  Is there anything else wrong with this article?  I feel like something might be unencylopedic around the Fleetway and Archie section, though, but I'm not sure.  So is there anything wrong with it? --71.104.187.145 20:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Tikal the Echidna]]
Talk:Symplectic vector field

message: Can anybody explain to me why this is a stub. I think the mayor points are mentioned. In what direction does this need further extension? Hottiger 20:26, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be good to add some examples. Expand on the statements about cohomology. Compare and contrast to ... I duuno,   let me think of something ..  flows that preserve a Poisson algebra structure instead ofa symplectic structure. There's always something more that can be said. linas 02:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why a stub?
Talk:Glasgow Chronology

message: I don't believe this chronology was ever referred to as anything other than the "Glasgow Chronology" - 
calling the article the "New Chronology" (a later revision devised by Peter James & David Rohl) is just misleading and, well, wrong :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Feline1 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 23 March 2006
: Rohl has never referred to his chronological framework as anything else but "New Chronology". And such equations as Hathepsut=Queen-of-Sheba or Thutmose3=Shishak are not part of Rohl's framework at all. Cush 20:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I added a bit.  I too believe that in chronology circles the chronology put forth at Glasgow is referred to as "the Glasgow Chronology" and that when someone says "the New Chronology" they mean Rohl's New Chronology.  To refer to the ideas of James, et al., the phrase "James Chronology" is used.  Perhaps some more New Chronologians (I made that up) can wholly update this article and David Rohl.  I will always try to, but time is always fleeting.
TuckerResearch 17:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say it would be quite a good move to separate the Velikovsky stuff from what Rohl has come up with. Nobody in the New Chronology (Rohl) circles is identifying Hatshepsut with the Queen of Sheba. Cush 14:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The New Chronology 

message: I don't know if Rohl's Akhenaten-Ugarit eclipse is even accepted, but his alleged claim that the only possible date in all of the 2nd millennium BC is 1012 is ludicrous. A brief scan of NASA's eclipse atlas gives a perfectly good candidate for a total eclipse in northern Egypt in 1338 BC, squat within Akhenaten's conventional rule. What's more, the 1012 eclipse is a rather poor candidate because it would have been visible at Ugarit only just before sunset. The 1338 one otoh was visible during the afternoon. Not a very promising grounds for shifting world history around for several centuries.  Can we get some sort of citation this eclipse is at least accepted as a synchronism between Egypt and the Levant? dab (𒁳) 15:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny, I'm just reading Rohl's reasoning behind the date on this in Pharaohs and Kings (A Test of Time). Apparently the Ugarit Eclipse Tablet mentions that the eclipse happens "(at the) going down (of the) sun (goddess)". Rohl adds a note from C.B.F. Walker where he states "At first sight the text refers to an event occurring at sunset". I hope that helps answers the question. --Adrift* (talk) 05:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: eclipse
Talk:Henry P. Haun

message: HAUN, Henry Peter, a Senator from California; born near Newtown, Scott County, Ky., January 18, 1815; attended the common schools and Transylvania University, Lexington, Ky.; studied law; admitted to the bar in 1839 and began practice in Lexington, Ky.; prosecuting attorney of Scott County in 1845; moved to Clinton County, Iowa, and settled in Hauntown in 1845; practiced law and owned a distillery, sawmill, and store; delegate to the Iowa constitutional convention in 1846; moved to Yuba County, Calif., in 1849 and settled in Marysville; continued the practice of law; also engaged in agricultural pursuits; county judge 1851-1854; appointed as a Democrat to the United States Senate to fill the vacancy caused by the death of David C. Broderick and served from November 3, 1859, to March 4, 1860; unsuccessful candidate for election to fill the term; chairman, Committee on Enrolled Bills (Thirty-sixth Congress); died in Marysville, Yuba County, Calif., June 6, 1860; interment in Marysville Cemetery.
http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=H000353
He and John B. Weller are likely the CA senators who reputedly kept the balanace between slave & free states in US Senate. Weller's inaugural address as governor supports the Douglas squatter sovereignty plan --JimWae 06:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Professional Soccer League (1984–2001)

message: Someone with superior knowledge of some of the truly arcane aspects of AISA/NPSL rules such as the "supergoal" mentioned in the article (two or three points awarded for a successful shot from "outside the arc" reminiscient of basketball's three-point shot) should feel welcome to contribute here.  I, who attended/watched a very limited number of games and even then was not entirely sure of what I was watching, am inadequate to the task, as I don't know what the distances for these arcs were.
Rlquall 20:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Thomas R. Bard

message: I added significant biographical information. I don't think this article is a stub anymore. Please feel free to continue to improve the page. Some very useful information can be found in his biography, Oil, Land and Politics. User:notecardforfree 1:27 PST  June 27, 2007
:The formatting of the references could be improved. John Carter 20:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I made some changes to the formatting of the references. I think it is much better now. Notecardforfree 22:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biographical Data
Talk:Frank Flint

message: This article claims that the Mission style is the "official" style of government buildings in Southern California. While the Mission style may feature prominantly in government buildings, I am almost certain that it is not an "official" style. If it is, it should be supported by evidence. If it is not, this claim should be removed. Notecardforfree 00:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced Claim

message: Regarding the move of this page, Frank Flint (54%), Frank P. Flint (39%), and F. P. Flint (5%) are the only iterations of Flint's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com. Star Garnet (talk) 03:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name 

message: Some details on Flint's birth family, and the family's removal to southern California, are given in the obituary of his mother, reproduced here: https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/195090752/althea-louise-flint_danskin 173.17.176.73 (talk) 15:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for the note, I added some cites from his mother's obituary and his own to clarify some details, including his parents' names. --Engineerchange (talk) 17:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth family
Talk:Pole of Inaccessibility research station

message: Note: Nudel'man gives 82S 54E; so does . The confusion probably arises of what was then and is now known about the shape of antarctica. William M. Connolley 20:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Has the station never been used after December 1958? Was it built with the intention of using it for a few days in December 1958? Why would anybody erect buildings and a statue if it was clear that they wouldn't be used ever after? If there were plans to use the station again, why have they never been carried out? 21:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use after December 1958

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pole of Inaccessibility (Antarctic research station) →  – Per WP:NATURALDISAMBIG. Rublov (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 November 2021
Talk:George C. Perkins

message: Regarding the move of this page, George C. Perkins (77%), G. C. Perkins (14%), and George Perkins (7%) are the only iterations of Perkins's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com. Star Garnet (talk) 23:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Victor H. Metcalf

message: JR Knowland never served in the 8th Cong District He succeded Metcalf in the 3rd Congressional District in 1904. Knowland held the 3rd Cong District of Alameda Solano and Contra Costa counties. After the 1910 Census, when in 1911 all Alameda County was the 6th Cong District.
I wrote the biography of Joseph R. Knowland (Ustye (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joseph R. Knowland succeded Metcalf in Congress from California 3rd Cong District
Talk:Amy Ryan

message: Someone's going to have to start up a page for tha ctress of the same name.
Yes, there is already Oscar buz about her performance in Gone Baby Gone.  There needs to be a page on her.AndrewGreenfield 03:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Uggh. The directions are so technical! If anyone wants to do it, this image is available....http://i376.photobucket.com/albums/oo201/CookieFromLandover/Head%20Shots/AmyRyanHeadshot.jpg Codenamemary (talk) 20:54, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Want To Upload New Image
Talk:Andersonville Prison

message: Macho Callahan movie (1970) - he breaks out of a Confederate military prison (Andersonville), intent on revenge against the man who conscripted him into the army - www.imdb.com/title/tt0066033/   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.72.221 (talk) 19:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Depiction in popular culture addition

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 17:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Andersonville National Historic Site →  – This article is primarily about the prison, and secondarily about the National Historic Site. Ideally there would be another article about the latter, but in the meantime the title of this article should reflect its main topic. Short discussion along these lines occurred back in 2008 here. –CWenger (^ • @) 16:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 July 2021 

message: It should be added that another personal, first-hand account of a Union POW by the name of John McElroy (Private, Company L, 16th Illinois Cavalry) wrote a book of his time in Andersonville. It's titled "This Was Andersonville" and it was edited by Roy Meredith. Copyright 1957. Jmiddl12 (talk) 23:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  John McElroy 

message: The Library of Congress description for this image says "Erroneous caption on card: "Returned Federal prisoners from Andersonville prison."" LoC identifies the prisoner as having come from the prison at Belle Isle (Richmond, Virginia). I have therefore updated the description and renamed it on Commons, and removed it from this article. It's an important historical image but apparently not related to this specific topic. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  prisoner image
Talk:M621 motorway

message: I repositioned the Leeds panorama image; when viewing the article in IE6 it had been positioned nicely, but in both firefox and opera the image was placed directly over the table of junctions which made the article a right mess. --VinceBowdren (talk) 12:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image positioning 

message: This article needs updating as it still talks about 2008 in the future tense. I presume that the roadworks have also now ended? Thryduulf (talk) 14:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 
Talk:Vic Fazio

message: says he's on the board of Northrup Grumman and also some law firm.   So what is he, basically a lobbyist???  107.36.30.226 (talk) 02:50, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted your edits, because there was no source and this is a biography of a living person. Can you provide a reliable source for the corporations you list and the Sunlight Foundation claim? If so, I'd have no problem with adding this info back in. -Brycehughes (talk) 09:53, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-congressional career 
Talk:Bill Baker (politician)

message: Baker is most well known as a politician where he used the name Bill Baker. I am proposing that we move the article from William P. Baker to Bill Baker (politician) per WP:COMMONNAME. Another option is Bill Baker (California politician) but at present there are no other politicians on the Bill Baker disambiguation article though there are several on the William Baker disambiguation article. --Marc Kupper|talk 15:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to Bill Baker (politician)
Talk:Ein Gedi

message: Could someone provide a map locating Ein Gedi?  The Jade Knight 20:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be nice to have a link to a definition of a dunam. According to my dictionary (World Book, 1984), really they're donums. But my dictionary doesn't give an exact definition.
This article seems to say both that the Ein Gedi National Park is 14,000 dunams (in the first paragraph about the park) and that it's only 8 dunams (in the last paragraph about the park).
I wanted to know, because when it said that in 2005, a lit cigarette burned two-thirds of it, I wanted to know how much land that was.
Nice article, in other ways, though. Plus, nice pictures.
Entwhiz (talk) 20:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunams? What are they? Are they really donums? How many? 
Talk:Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame

message: *:File:Gerald Ford with the Packers.jpg. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  17:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: To be added
Talk:Gegenschein

message: Exactly what relevance does the link to the counterglow website have to do with this entry. It seems to be a webportal. Rozzychan 05:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its actually a forum (follow the link to community) but feel free to remove the link if you wish. --Spartaz 21:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: counterglow on the net

message: It's pronounced gay-geyn-shine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beowulf1978 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a German I can assure you that the German pronounciation is ˈgeːgənʃaɪn, not ˈgeɪgənʃaɪn (provided that I have found the correct symbol from the special characters list). As far as I know there is no English equivalent to the german eː. However, I do not know whether there is a convention about a more "anglified" pronounciation in English.--SiriusB (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  German pronunciation 

message: "Atmospheric optical phenomena" is incorrect since this occurs in interplanetary space outside the atmosphere.
69.72.27.25 (talk) 19:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: Although the caption provided comes from the description in Wikimedia Commons provided by the original photographer Yuri Beletsky, I believe there is an error.  The "band running diagonally from top left to lower right" is the zodiacal light, whereas the gegenschein is the enhancement of the zodiacal light at 180 degrees from the sun. In the photo, this occurs at the center in the left/right direction, along the band (vertically above the silhouetted flat-roofed building).  
I would suggest a change from the current caption "The Gegenschein is seen in this image as a band running diagonally from the top left to lower right." to perhaps "The Gegenschein is seen as an enhanced brightness in the band of zodiacal light running from top left to lower right, directly above the silhouetted flat-roofed building."
I am reticent to make the edit myself owing to the original description coming from the actual photographer, but I do believe it is wrong.
Here is a different photo of the full excursion of the zodiacal light with the gegenschein noted at the 180 degree location.
--Gscreol (talk) 02:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second figure, caption issue 

message: Please see pictures if you google Gegen licht. It's means you see light behind the object, but this light is not from that it is a reflection. I think gegen is a wrong word for that. --Beyond silence 10:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you are looking for here. The word licht does not appear in this article. The German term Gegenlicht means backlit; see :de:Gegenlicht. Gegen means against, among other things. Eric talk 13:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gegenschein vs Gegen licht 

message: isn't there a period when gegenschein is no longer visible? Where's the info on that?
100.15.117.34 (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete
Talk:4th and 26

message: This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD debate link 

message: Don't forget, this was the very next game for the Pack after Hasselbeck's ill-fated "we want the ball and we're gonna score"!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.240.53 (talk) 00:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hasselbeck

message: I distinctly remember the def. cor. for GB being fired for this, but I don't remember who it was.  Does anyone else remember this?  Maybe we could add an 'Aftermath' section/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.240.53 (talk) 00:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Also

message: It is absolutely imperative that an article be created for the play that knocked the Minnesota Vikings out of the playoffs (McCown to Poole), and gave the Packers the division. If that did not happen, then 4th and 26 would have not happened either. Zonafan39 (talk) 01:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  4th and 24
Talk:George Whitney Calhoun

message: Agreed that this page needs some cleanup.  I've taken a first pass at it - thoughts?  --Chancemichaels 16:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The Dope Sheet is a 90 year old publication that only ran for 3 years. Today it is essentially a gameday guide. Hardly notable enough to have its own article, and can be easily covered in the other articles. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  18:27, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge  Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  15:11, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[The Dope Sheet]] with [[George Whitney Calhoun]] and [[Green Bay Packers]] 

message: Off-topic text removed from the article by me; this is not Curly Lambeau. Left here in case its removal breaks any refs. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 05:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text
Talk:Robert Lagomarsino

message: Some text appears to duplicate: Inventory of the Robert J. Lagomarsino Collection: Federal Collection, 1974-1992. Djembayz (talk) 23:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  May contain text from the finding aid of his papers 