Talk:Young People Fucking

message: I searched for  /.ing and this was second on the list... interesting... (was hoping for a reference to Slashdot)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.203.42 (talk) 04:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've come back to this time and again but am not sure that (a) the overall soundtrack is notable enough to list every track, such as in a track list template; or (b) that there were any standout tracks to be mentioned in prose.  More than 10% of the film's budget was spent on music rights, but I haven't found a whole lot of mention in reliable secondary sources. – Reidgreg (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: is there anything at all about how there is not one penis shot in this film? considering that men and women are both having sex in it and men are the ones claiming society is so sexually repressed it is extremely sexist to only show women's breasts and then conveniently and blatently hide all the men's penises. this is usually done by men because they like to use women for sexual entertainment only and seeing women naked like this gives them power over women. If they show penises they lose that power. for a movie that claims to be about sexual liberation why is it only women are being "liberated" here and why is it the only reviews are from males who got a free titty show? and of course they liked it. are there any women talking about this at all and giving their reviews and why dont you point out that the reviews are only from men with no male nudity in the film?
: If you'll reference Sex differences in humans, you will note that breasts and the penis are not similar organs. I will refrain from pointing out the hypocrisy of complaining about sexism while simultaneously maintaining a sexual double-standard. However, if you can produce sources of sociological criticisms of this film pertaining specifically to the dearth of full frontal male nudity, feel free to edit the article accordingly. Tha Pyngwyn (talk) 14:36, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  the use of women for sexual entertainment 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Young People Fucking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110706172822/http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/thehouse_20080531_6051.mp3 to http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/thehouse_20080531_6051.mp3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I posted a major expansion of the article, and am submitting it for DYK review.  I'm pretty satisfied with it, but I feel the lead could be expanded a bit and the critical response section trimmed.  I wasn't too sure what to pull from it; many of the reviews which I felt were lower quality were also the negative ones, and I didn't want to lose NPOV.  Also, I was afraid that my attempts at summarizing multiple reviews started to get into WP:SYNTH.  For example, it seems that Canadian reviews were more positive, as were reviews from the film festivals, while American and DVD reviewers tended to go more negative (some perhaps disappointed that it wasn't porn).  There were many disagreements between reviewers about the realism of the movie, and of which segments and performances were better than others.  Assistance from an experienced hand at summarizing reviews would be appreciated. – Reidgreg (talk) 17:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: An editor thought it was appropriate to comment out various reviews, hiding them from the article. The editor did not feel strongly enough to remove the reviews or even start a discussion about removing or keeping them. 
Out of sight is out of mind, I have deleted those hidden reviews from the article. 
If anyone wants to discuss if any of them should be included in the article then please do go back and review the edit when they were hidden. 
Restore them, delete them, make a decision, just don't hide them. See also Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Hidden text -- 109.77.203.218 (talk) 20:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commented out reviews