Talk:Phosphatidylserine

message: This protein has an important role in apoptosis for phagocytosis.  To expand this article, could explain the use.  Rage italic 15:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, biologists are funny that way.  ;)  Rage italic (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance in Apoptosis 

message: Substantial parts of the article, including almost all the intro text, appear to have been copied verbatim from other sources. In some cases additional editing was done since the original violation, but that makes the whole thing a derivative work, so even edited copied text had to go. The violations were from  and . If anyone has evidence that these sources are available for use under the GFDL, then the text should be restored and a note added at the bottom of the article. This is a big step back for this article, but we'll just have to rewrite with original text. Vectro (talk) 15:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations 

message: It is clear that commercially available PS products are extracted from soybeans, but there is no mention of the beans or other soy products in the "Dietary Sources" section, which strikes me as odd(?) Grant | Talk 02:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soy products as a source 

message: When you say Soy-derived PS is Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) and is a safe nutritional supplement for older persons if taken up to a dosage of 200 mg three times daily 
I found more appropriate to say that according to a trial, Soy-derived PS is a safe nutritional supplement for older persons if taken up to a dosage of 200 mg three times daily. There isn't any guideline to support this dosage. You just found it at a specific study which in the future  may be proved wrong. 688dim (talk) 16:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soy - derived PS dosage 

message: Reference 9 is a dead link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mechestudent (talk • contribs) 16:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link 

message: The following user edit was removed from the live Phosphatidylserine page to the Talk section for discussion:
:Apparently all of the studies showing benefits in sports performance with supplementation were published in the same journal, had a low number of subjects, and were authored by one or more employees of Increnovo LLC, which has filed for patents related to marketing of PS supplements and is partnered with Chemi Nutra, a leading producer of PS supplements 
::14:00, 13 May 2013   97.122.101.202
:
—
All three referenced studies were published in the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, a popular journal that features open access content that is readily available to the general public (paywall free) . I can only suspect the nature of the access and familiarity of submission process to be reasoning for publication.
The studies also disclose that the authors have no competing interests.
Chaseme (talk) 21:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports Nutrition Section | Unreliable Sources? 

message: "Although a preliminary study in rats indicated that the soy product was as effective as that of bovine origin ..."
A total non sequitur. Needs to be rewritten. ---Dagme (talk) 11:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The U.S. FDA designation as a "Qualified Health Claim" does not mean that the claim has qualified, i.e., met minimum standards for a health claim. What QHC status means is that the evidence is not sufficient to support a regular claim, and hence any company making a claim for phosphtidylserine and cognition needs to use EXACTLY the wording the FDA has (begrudgingly) allowed. The FDA created QHCs years after the health claim process started as a sort of limbo to park supplement ingredients and functional foods with weak or inconsistent evidence. Rather than be potentially limited by QHC wording, supplement companies often never ally for a claim, and instead default to what is allowed as Structure:Function wording. An example in this case would be "Phosphatidylserine supports normal brain functions."David notMD (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memory and cognition 

message: If you google oysters Phosphatidylserine you can see some supplement companies are thinking of making PS from oysters, but can anyone find the amount of PS in boiled canned oysters?
93.106.23.7 (talk) 01:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  PS content in oysters? 

message: Which sources of Phosphatidylserine (PS) contain high amounts of PS-DHA Conjugate?
Is supplement (softgels etc) the only option? Or does eating meat, fish or White Beans work?
Is White Beans the only good natural source of PS for a person who does not eat Meat or Fish?
ee1518 (talk) 16:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PS DHA Conjugate. White Beans the only good natural non-meat/fish source of Phosphatidylserine? 

message: The lede mentions "it is a key pathway for viruses to enter cells via apoptotic mimicry," but there is no elaboration on this in the rest of the article.
This Wikipedia reader would like to know more about the implications of this. Could taking a phosphatidylserine supplement facilitate a viral infection, even to a slight extent? 2601:281:CC80:5AE0:4028:95D4:6004:610C (talk) 23:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathway for viruses to enter cells? 

message: I seem to have accidentally messed up the infobox for it to not be on the side. If anyone could fix that, that'd be great! Thanks and sorry! Clairebookworm — Preceding undated comment added 20:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: — It was Special:Diff/1028409457, which moved the lead section above the WP:SHORTDESC and WP:CHEMBOX templates, which I've reverted. (As far as I see, there were no other changes in that edit.) The shortdesc and infobox templates should be at the top of the wikitext, with the lead section below them (MOS:ORDER). —2d37 (talk) 08:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting