lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Patuakhali Science and Technology University

message: Here faculty means number of lecturers, Professors etc., so be careful to write the value. I've deleted the faculty which stated 3. Again campus not means to be the location, it means area and urban or anything. So I've also deleted this value. Thank you. Tanvir che (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Faculty
Talk:Chronic toxicity

message: The title of this article is "Chronic Toxicity" but the contents discuss Obtuse toxicity (Though it seems the meanings are similar). Additionally, the article is entirely about marine toxicity, while I came across this article while researching chronic toxicity testing for medical devices, so I believe the article should be made more general. 12.40.131.195 (talk) 01:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title and contents issue 

message: C'mon, has this article been the subject of some text torturing procedure? Obviously 'obtuse' toxicity should be chronic toxicity, which is the proper counterpart to acute (toxicity) in this context.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.180.103.115 (talk) 03:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obtuse (!) toxicity?
Talk:The Problem of Peace lecture by Albert Schweitzer

message: Please count one vote in favor of keeping Dr. Schweitzer's speech with Wikipedia.
Move it to another Wiki section if you must, but the historical importance of this article - and the significance of the article to so many - mark it as being of historical importance to civilization.
The words of the Declaration of Independence or Magna Charta would receive similar consideration - of such importance to the history of our society that the preservation of the same is tantamount to other considerations.
Thank you for making such noble works so accessible for the furtherance of knowledge and the building of our human race.
Cfbass (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comments. The deletion discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Problem of Peace lecture by Albert Schweitzer; feel free to express your opinion there. My 'deletion' proposal was actually a proposal to move the speech to English Wikisource, which is expressly designed for the content of written and oral works. Maralia (talk) 18:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Walter Byers Scholarship

message: As discussed at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates#List of Walter Byers Scholars, This article is not really a list, but rather is an article about the scholarship program that includes a list of past recipients. The most precise and complete name for the article would be Walter Byers Postgraduate Scholarship Program, but it also could be called Walter Byers Scholarship. (These and several other potential alternative names all redirect to this article.) --Orlady (talk) 16:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As the page creator, I have already noted at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Walter Byers Scholarship that I am willing to rename, but it will take an admin to do so because the page has a ton of redirects already created at all logic move/rename destinations.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  19:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In order to have this moved by an admin, I proposed the move at Wikipedia:Requested moves. I listed it under "Other proposals" (instead of "Uncontroversial proposals") because of uncertainty as to which of the possible new names would be best. This is the place to discuss the choice of a new name. --Orlady (talk) 03:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any preference for a new name then? Keith D (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess "Walter Byers Scholarship" probably makes the most sense, but I'm no expert on the topic... --Orlady (talk) 00:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Template talk:WikiProject Databases

message: Can someone please explain to me how this is supposed to work.  I see many articles tagged with this template showing up in WP:COMPSCI, but apparently it is not possible for me to assess such articles for WP:COMPSCI alone.  The implied assumption is that an article of Top importance for WPDATABASE would necessarily also be of Top importance for WP:COMPSCI.  I hope the problem with this assumption is obvious.
I understand there has recently been a push to bring together the many computing-related wikiprojects, but, as always, it is incomplete.  In the meantime can someone give me some guidance regarding this template.  Ideogram (talk) 12:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Databases#Restructure proposal. The current situation is not completely satisfactory, but is a work in progress... —Ruud 12:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If I don't get a response in the next few days I'll be bold and start monkeying with the template. Ideogram (talk) 23:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  The proposals by Pnm are quite thoroughly thought through. Be bold, but not reckless, please. —Ruud 02:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposals are great.  The implementation is lacking.  Ideogram (talk) 09:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Completely true, but I don't think that should be used as an excuse to start doing in a less careful way (also see meta:Eventualism). There is a rather detailed set of instructions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Databases#Option 2: Task force in computing and CS on what needs to be done if you care sufficiently to get this implemented. The proposal suggests using a bot, but these steps can be done manually if you're motivated enough. —Ruud 11:29, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikiproject template overlap
Talk:Mohsin Razi

message: Moved from User talk:Jfire. Jfire (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, first of all, are you Mohsin, or closely related to him? If so, you would appear to have a conflict of interest, and my advice would be to avoid editing this article altogether. The reasons we discourage editors from editing articles on subjects which they are intimately related to is that it frequently gives rise to other problems such as those this article is tagged for. As for the other specific issues that are tagged, they seem basically accurate at this time. Being the Consul General is a claim of notability, but it should be backed up with references to significant coverage in reliable sources -- it's not clear that any of the external links qualify (admittedly I only looked at them briefly). The orphan tag is definitely appropriate as no other article pages link to Mohsin Razi -- only user pages and spam reports. Jfire (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not Mohsin, I'm his Son - Haider. that is why i understand the COI, having said that, for the category Pakistani Diplomats, most have been done by relatives, or people with COI- I am currently trying to populate this Category. Being the Consul General, can be confirmed by going to the US Dept. of State and the Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs site, can be verified. I also understand the Orphan tag now - thanks alot, i'll try and fix that. Would it be then ok for the Original Research, Verifiability and Notability tags to be removed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Razih (talk • contribs) 22:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks for disclosing your relationship. My recommendation stands, but if you are determined to edit the article, I can give you a few specific points. Original research does seem to be a danger here. For example, is the fact that Mr. Razi speaks three languages verifiable in a reliable source (I don't see it on the Consulate Profile), or does that come from your knowledge as his son? If there is a source for that fact, it would be a good idea to provide it using a footnote. I'll add one as an example. By the way, you can sign your name to edits on talk pages by typing: ~~~~ Like this: Jfire (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I'll untag the notability, since I feel that has been established, I'll try and get references for the language confirmation, and try and link articles to this one. Thanks alot. Razih (talk) 18:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article tags
Talk:Maryang

message: It is recommended to incorportate this one into Kangjin county. It does not have not much information and external links, either.Pju0353 (talk) 18:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Fort-Dauphin (Madagascar)

message: Hello,
I 'll change this back to Fort-Dauphin.  Why?   The name of the municipality is: Commune Urbain de Fort-Dauphin.
Yes - there are several spellings that are used, but Tôlanaro is the less used in Madagascar.
On the town hall of Fort-Dauphin is written: Commune Urbain Fort-Dauphin 
They mostly name it : Fort-Dauphin or Taolagnaro  is used. 
Tôlanaro even only exists in articles that copy from wikipedia.
I do not know how they came up to name this page like that. Also "unknown" to the L'Express de Madagascar 
*The mayor speaks here about Fort-Dauphin: 
And the alternative names:  Fort-Dauphin, Tolagnaro and Faradofay (from Arabe)
*Tsaradia names it: Taolagnaro (Fort-Dauphin) 
* Also Malagasy Newspapers use often Taolagnaro:  and 
But I see no reason, to find a "phantasy" word (missspelling??).
So, I think that wikipedia should go after it's official name, and that is Commune Urbain Fort-Dauphin.
Yes, I know, there are weired minds, that think to make the local people happier in finding Great Local names. This their post-fascists-apartheid.
I give a shit on them.   Malagasy use: Fort-Dauphin, as well as some others.  They do not have such a weired mind.
Regards
I'm so tired (talk) 06:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: French language uses accents. If there is a French word, you may use them. But I see no reason, why English pages should use French words to describe Malagasy localities ??
Example: Antsirabé = French;  Antsirabe = Malagasy; Roman Catholic Diocese of Antsirabé => that's a lingustical hermaphrodite.
Regards
I'm so tired (talk) 08:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: =
Talk:Frederick J. Stephens

message: It's hard to see how someone whose books are used for reference throughout the world, and those books being widely available, is not notable? Paste (talk) 18:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's some information at Bayonetcollectors The genre within third Reich militaria is pretty narrow, is Wikipedia only for main stream authours and books ? Would it help if I added ISBN numbers on his books ? --Morphinea (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is for anything notable. If you like, you could remove the prod and we could take it to AfD so that a wider audience can comment on the matter? J Milburn (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I was offering reasons that he may be notable- if he had won major literary awards, then yes, he would be notable. If I am so ignorant, please, educate me, tell my how he meets our notability guidelines. I did not say anything about him serving in the military, where did you get that from? Last thing- do NOT sign your posts as someone you are not. J Milburn (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Preserving here by providing this link. My rationale was: "Reduce uncited; reduce excessive list of nn works; notability tag". Please let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit
Talk:Atsimo-Atsinanana

message: it's  a very inspiring piece Shirley Ann Costello (talk) 17:51, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well written
Talk:Androy

message: Both the Androy and Anosy articles include, in their history sections, mention that in 1936 "The first sisal plantation near Amboasary is established by Établissements Gallois. Henri de Heaulme established his sisal plantation and the Berenty forest reserve." I'm trying to establish which region the Berenty reserve is in, and this ambiguity is not helpful. The reserve is (just) west of the Mandrare River, which I think puts it in Androy. Anyone know for certain? Dave.Dunford (talk) 16:14, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Berenty Forest Reserve
Talk:Betafo

message: actually, that's the district of Betafo which contains the town of Betafo. However, my book is set in a much smaller community (a fokontany)
called Betafo which is in the district of Arivonimamo. So the map is wrong.
    David Graeber  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.81.89 (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Mineral lick

message: "Salt Spring" redirects here. I have no clue why; As far as I can tell there is no relationship other than both having to do with salt. 
38.113.0.254 (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A decade late, but not anymore. L3X1 (distant write) 23:30, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "Salt spring" redirect here? 

message: Birds could be added to the list. Crows, jays, and a variety of others like salt-licks, natural and artificial. Conspicuously absent are raptors, perhaps because their diets are naturally high in salt and like minerals. JohndanR (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birds
Talk:Morris Ital

message: Morris Marina vans were available with 2.0l Perkins engines, both as fleet vehicles with e.g. BT and for retail sale. I used to have one.MBRZ48 (talk) 22:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Scrub that. I'm mixing up Maestros and Marinas.MBRZ48 (talk) 23:02, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Diesel engines
Talk:Morris Isis

message: I have amended the Morris Oxford series III link to Morris Oxford Series III because:
* BMC used Series III on its brochure - Morris Oxford Series III Saloon 1956-57 Original Foldout Brochure No. H&E 5646
* BMC used Series III on its drivers handbook -  The Morris Cowley 1500, Oxford (Series III), Oxford Traveller (Series IV) and Half-Ton Van (Series III)  driver's handbook  
* The linked Wikipedia page is titled Morris Oxford Series III
GTHO (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morris Oxford Series III link
Talk:Tyson Jackson

message: Wikipedia says that college athletes are notable, and given that this player is one of the top players at his position, he is easily notable enough. See Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability#Players.►Chris NelsonHolla! 19:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We're in process of revising the notability guidelines for players.  It would  be fair to say that our discussions would presently point toward this being a notable player.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: On this page, when I tried to edit the table to add the 2015 season and stats for it, it messed up the entire table and put everything else in the rest of the page in the table. Don't really know what is wrong, already did this on another table. If anyone could help that would be appreciated  
Cliftonsanez (talk) 02:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table messed up 
Talk:Oyster crab

message: Thank you for properly formatting the article. I am dubious about the taxonomical information - why would it be called a New Zealand Pea crab if it is found chiefly in the waters of the North Atlantic? You may have some information that I am unaware of. Paul Austin (talk) 19:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my mistake! I have never used taxoboxes before, so I copied one from New Zealand pea crab, which is of the same genus, then changed the latin name- I missed the common name in the taxobox. I have also created redirects so that it links from Pinnotheridae, where it is listed. J Milburn (talk) 19:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I have changed the redirect, and according to Pinnotheridae, pea crab and oyster crab are of the same genus, but different species. J Milburn (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxobox

message: — Assignment last updated by Annaelizaf (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Invertebrate Zoology
Talk:Duke Robinson

message: Wikipedia says that college athletes are notable, and given that this player is one of the top players at his position, he is easily notable enough. See Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability#Players.►Chris NelsonHolla! 19:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Humber Super Snipe

message: I reverted this edit on the basis that, without some cited evidence, it's a difference of opinion. Who knows? Can anyone help with some documentation, please? Cheers Bjenks (talk) 13:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series III or IV 
Talk:Bugarach

message: We are told that the location is first mentioned as Villa Burgaragio in 889 AD, citing Dictionnaire étymologique des noms de lieux en France, Ch. Rostaing 1963. We are also told that it derives from the German Burghar (which seemingly comes from German names meaning Hard Castle), which seems reasonable, but also from 'Bugari', allegedly referring to the Bulgarian Bogomilis. But the Bogomil article suggests Bogomil began preaching in the reign of Peter I of Bulgaria (927-969), and thus well after 889 AD. So at least one of these claims would seem to be wrong, though I don't wish to correct it myself, as I'm not sure which statement is wrong, even though the likeliest candidate for being wrong seems to be the claimed derivation from the Bogomilis.Tlhslobus (talk) 04:05, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates Inconsistent 

message: December 21 came and went, but the hippie armies didn't. In retrospect it's easy to see what a lot of people suspected: that the warnings from mayor Delord were so much spin. The 20,000 visitors metioned in the article has two citations, but both sources in turn cite Delord. Hexmaster (talk) 09:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bugarach Hype/Hoax
Talk:Coustaussa

message: Mscprm (talk) 21:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Jewelled gecko

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Hi, I copy here what I put on the discussion page of the photo on Commons:
:Hi!
:As far as I'm concerned, this can't be a jewelled gecko.
:Considering the place where it was found, I guess it must be a Canterbury gecko. Goodshort (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the image with the other one from the article. KakarikiNZ (talk) 00:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Auckland green gecko

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Antidesma bunius

message: Isn't this berry also called "maoberry"? 76.189.141.37 (talk) 01:14, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Also called "maoberry"?
Talk:Winter X Games XII

message: Can any admins that have revert ability or anyone else go back to the version by misfittoys?  All of the references in the highlights section were deleted and weren't reverted when the vandalism was fixed.  I can fix it manually if I have to, but that's a lot more work than just reverting back.  Thanks. matt91486 (talk) 16:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Florida's 21st congressional district

message: No results for 2018, 2016, and 2014 even if it was unopposed
Huskermax5 (talk) 17:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Results

message: For anyone that doesn't know, Congressional District is supposed to be capitalized.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE98:1510:4CEF:D74C:D98C:4A0E (talk) 15:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Patrick Ferry

message: Isn't Patrick Ferry a Irish Football (Soccer) player? RegierungDavidlands1852 (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There very well could be an Irish football player with that name, but this article is about a different person. If the football player is notable, then a separate article named with a parenthetical phrase to disambiguate it such as "Patrick Ferry (Irish football player)" could be written. Indyguy (talk) 18:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)