lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oregon Mozart Players

message: I just started adding the page (within the last 5 minutes) and hope people would wait until I'm done before deciding on whether this music group has any importance.  BTW, I do not belong to this chamber orchestra and am not trying to sell them to anyone.--tess 01:00, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I question whether the article would fall within the notability requirements at Wikipedia:Notability (music).  Philippe Beaudette 01:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is why I proposed a merge into Hult Center for the Performing Arts.  There is already a section in that article on resident companies, not all of which need their own article. The content of this article can be merged into that section. -Amatulic 18:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm okay with a merge. Philippe Beaudette 19:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Seem to me it meets #7 of the notabiltiy guide-line.  There isn't anything else like it in this region - a professional quality chamber orchestra.  --tessc (talk) 21:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion/Hangon
Talk:National Council for the Social Studies

message: copyvio like a mofo. WillC 01:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: \  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.39.156.250 (talk) 23:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  i want to get help in homw work
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Rhythmnation2004 3

message: User:Rhythmnation2004
      run at Fri Jan 19 01:05:45 2007 GMT
Image:	63
Mainspace	820
Talk:	29
Template:	5
User talk:	47
User:	37
Wikipedia:	57
avg edits per article	3.74
earliest	03:00, 31 December 2005
number of unique articles	283
total	1058
2005/12 	4 	
2006/1 	9 	
2006/2 	0 	
2006/3 	10 	
2006/4 	19 	
2006/5 	46 	
2006/6 	153 	
2006/7 	315 	
2006/8 	36 	
2006/9 	52 	
2006/10 	47 	
2006/11 	92 	
2006/12 	116 	
2007/1 	159 
Rhythmnation2004's editcount summary stats as of 01:05, January 19th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 01:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:RTÉ lyric fm

message: The articles RTÉ lyric fm and RTÉ Lyric FM  refer to the same radio station and seem to be almost identical. Despite the usage of lower case letters on the logo, the capitalized version of the name is the version most used.Flowerpotman 01:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for merge suggestion 
Talk:State College of Florida, Manatee–Sarasota

message: Would anyone be willing to help expand the athletics section? I think it could use a bit more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spaceboy900 (talk • contribs) 22:09, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athletics section 

message: http://web.archive.org/web/20181006124117/https://www.bradenton.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article219544595.html states that the dual enrollment program at other high schools was canned. Letters to the editor can't be cited, but maybe there is an actual news article about this?
WhisperToMe (talk) 06:42, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loss of dual enrollment at other high schools
Talk:Winston Rothschild, III

message: The Red Green Show has an organized characters section now, and most of the information in this article is redundant (and/or unnecessary to begin with). — KieferSkunk (talk) — 01:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... I apparently still don't understand how the deletion templates work. Think I'll just create a redirect back to the main article. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 01:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose "To Be Deleted"
Talk:Broward College

message: I'm not one to tag and run articles, but this article needs a total rewrite of the introduction, which sounds like a brochure promoting the college, or a press release. It's full of peacock words and unsubstantiated claims, and the entire article is unreferenced. Perhaps someone watching this page can take a look at it and fix some of the more egregious problems. Horologium t-c 04:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement Tag 

message: I removed all of the PR-speak from the article, and removed the list of non-notable alumni and faculty, but the entire article is unreferenced. Horologium (talk) 14:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced
Talk:Channel service unit

message: Note: this definition is taken from one of the public domain sections of Federal Standard 1037C. -- The Anome 01:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The formal definition has two misleading points. It defines the CSU as a "line bridging" device, which leads to multiple definitions, none of them quite accurate. It also notes the CSU may perform bit stuffing, which normally occurs only in bit stuffed WAN protocols such as DS2 and DS3. In the more common DS1 form, the associated DSU device is responsible for the data transfer and thus the bit stuffing.
Flagmichael 02:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little too literal 

message: Flagmichael 14:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added sections for Common varieties and Common practice
Talk:Chipola College

message: i had added the college's logo, but it was surreptitiously removed. any help in re-adding would be much appreciated. it's vexing to have some hack baseball player's face pop up as the associated image when facebook references the wiki page for the college.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Actuallyitis (talk • contribs) 05:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Assist

message: If someone who wasn't so oppsesed with the sports program rewrote this article. You'd think Chipola is nothing but a local sports club from the way it's written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.159.89.194 (talk) 14:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It would be wonderful 
Talk:Fen Ditton

message: Declaration of interests: the artist in residence, who uses the former Post Office as her studio and gallery, is my wife. Jonsg (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates, 8 July 2020
Talk:Department of Veterans' Affairs (Australia)

message: ... to have this article quoting the DVA website holus bolus, making up virtually all of the text of the article.  By far the worst Australian government/politics WP article I've ever come across. --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  12:29, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; I've reverted the latest attempt to restore the copy-pasted version. To respond to the editor who posted this statement - "[This site displays services available and is not intended to be an advertisement]" - there are multiple problems with this, which can be summarised easily. To begin with, it is necessary to remember what Wikipedia is not: it is not a manual or guidebook, nor is it a directory or complex exposition of all possible details. Moreover, copy-pasting text from other websites is almost never helpful, and is likely to be in a violation of copyright. Thirdly, even if it weren't a breach of copyright, and even if it were consistent with what Wikipedia is and is not, copy-pasting is implicitly problematic with respect to the need to maintain a neutral point of view, regardless of what was "intended". Cyril Washbrook (talk) 11:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Completely unacceptable

message: Why is this under "Department of Veterans Affairs" rather than "Australian Department of Veterans Affairs" like the US version? It seems like this page should be a disambiguation page. Binarybits (talk) 00:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The name of the department is "Department of Veterans' Affairs", not "Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs".  I'd rather see it called Department of Veterans' Affairs (Australia).  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  05:28, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia 
Talk:Naval Base Kitsap

message: "The" site for shipping ammunition to the Pacific Theater?
Hardly.  it was one of several.  Port Chicago, California, comes immediately to mind as another.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.148.29.14 (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While this age does have a lot of information, the list of ships and subs needs to be updated. Whaleyfun (talk) 02:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  update list of ships and subs 
Talk:Demographics of Sydney

message: Should Marrickville be added to Greek suburbs?  It may be filling with yuppies, but even today there is an association between Greeks and Marrickville.--Ferox117 (talk) 00:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went and reviewed the Australian Bureau of Statistics source and the figures match up precisely. 203.9.151.254 (talk) 07:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

message: Having both the table (Sydney population by year) and this picture seems unnecessary, and the layout of the article is improved considerably without it. Nuiop729 (talk) 11:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Sydney pop-MJC.svg 

message: Oddly enough, the section on religion contained less information than the same section in the main article on Sydney, more should be added. Daniel De Mol (talk) 01:35, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 

message: The list in the "Ethnic groups" showing ethnic associations with particular suburbs seems to be mostly original research, with only one entry being sourced. It needs to be referenced to show that it isn't OR. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic asociations with suburbs 

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney ethnic enclaves. Someone not using his real name (talk) 12:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related AfD 

message: and , discovered during the AfD mentioned above, look fairly useful for expanding the ethnic mix section. Someone not using his real name (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources 

message: I'd like to see a section on races ? As I have been interested in the race percentages of cities like New York, London, Tokyo, Beijing, and others with more ambiguous demographic data. By this I'm talking: black, white, arabic, south asian, east&south-east asian. Tetriminos (talk) 08:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race ?? 
Talk:Répétiteur

message: Can someone define the role of répétiteur in ballet? --GuillaumeTell 01:24, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! Robert Greer (talk) 00:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not addressed in this article:
*What training a répétiteur needs;
*Who – or what institution — certifies a répétiteur;
*What path a répétiteur's career follows.
Addressing these points, perhaps with specific examples, would make the article more informative.
yoyo (talk) 11:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Training, certification and career
Talk:Lobomycosis

message: The use of the word blastomycosis in the opening sentence of the article is a little confusing for me.  Is lobomycosis considered similar to blastomycosis, or is blastomycosis not just a specific disease caused by Blastomyces dermatitidis but also a group of diseases that include several distinct fungal infections?  --Joelmills 01:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blastomycosis?
Talk:AFL New Zealand

message: Shouldn't this page be moved to New Zealand Australian Football League ?  currently the full name redirects to the abbreviated name.  --Rulesfan 01:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move ? 
Talk:Emanuel (band)

message: Stop listing rock as a genere of Emanuel. Yes, they are rock. And so are half the bands in the last 50 years. Only list rock as a genre if they honestly can't be classified in a more specific manner. Emanuel are a post-hardcore band, a relatively specific genre of rock, and more specifically punk rock, therefore there is really no reason to add rock as a genre. - Razorhead March 31 2007
:Is that really a reason not include a genre, if it applies to this band as well as to many others? It's commonly done on Wikipedia to list first a more genereal genre, such as rock, hip-hop, etc., and then to list more specific styles, such as ska punk, christian gansta rap, post-hardcore (see e.g. Red Hot Chili Peppers, New Found Glory, Something Corporate, Justin Timberlake). --HarryCane 14:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stop changing the genre
Talk:Lacunary function

message: I started working on this article for two reasons.
*I'm currently reworking the article on complex logarithms, and that article naturally relates to the process of analytic continuation, which in turn relates to lacunary functions – these serve as a sort of brake or limit on the continuation process.
*I already knew a little bit about lacunary functions. When I ran the wiki search to look for "lacunary" I located one red link, on "lacunary series", in the article about Szolem Mandelbrojt. When I read that B. Mandelbrot, a Caltech alum, is his nephew, I grew even more interested.
Anyway, I'm going to add one more bit, about lacunary trigonometric series, and then get back to the complex logarithms, and topics in complex-valued continued fractions. I do have a couple of ideas, though, for any other authors who may come wandering through here.
* The "Hadamard gaps" of size pk have apparently been reduced to the size kp, which is almost the difference between an exponential and a linear function. I'm not sure what the best results are right now for proving the existence of the circle of singularities ... but I did locate some definitions of "(P,A)-lacunary functions" that defined the much smaller "gaps" between non-zero coefficients. From the little bit I was able to read, I remained uncertain whether these more modern "lacunary" functions still stop analytic continuation cold, or if they're a new kind of critter that just took over a conveniently available name.
* There seemed to be a lot of literature on lacunary Fourier series, but I haven't really dug into that any farther than to locate a couple of definitions and one basic theorem for this article. The stuff I did read stressed Lebesgue measure and some stuff like that ... I'm pretty rusty on measure theory.
* Intuitively, the boundary circle of a lacunary function is very chaotic. Here's this smoothly varying function with derivatives of every order in a region, but it blows up all along the boundary. It reminds me, in a way, of the boundary of the Mandelbrot set, and I think it's very interesting that two guys who are closely related both worked on objects that exhibit a kind of chaotic, but predictable, behavior.
Well, that's all I had in mind right now.  DavidCBryant 01:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the prime power function is lacunary. This follows from the Fabry gap theorem and the prime number theorem. I was about to add the following sentences, but maybe they count as original research? "Even slower gap growth can induce lacunarity, as per the Fabry gap theorem. For example, together with the Prime number theorem this implies lacunarity of f(z) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty z^{p_k} where p_k is the k'th prime." Anders Sandberg (talk) 17:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes on original article
Talk:Christie Front Drive

message: A lot of these album articles are messy stubs which harrdly provide any information, so I thought i'd might start expanding a bit.Starting with Anthology  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirvanarox55 (talk • contribs) 10:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Oasis Records

message: & Filmworks As A Team, Along With Neil Bogart's Permission. Donna Summer, Energizer, Schloss & Roberta Kelly Signed With Oasis Records. Donna Summer Made Her 1st Album Titled "Love To Love You Baby". The Smashing Hit Single "Love To Love You Baby" Turned Out As A Gold Hit, Because Both Giorgio & Neil Believed It Will Rise Up & Become No.1. The Good News Is It Has. All People Loved It, & Donna Summer Herself Was Very Happy To Work For Her Producers Giorgio Moroder & Pete Bellotte At Oasts Records. In Early 1976, Donna Summer Made Her 2nd Album Titled "Love Trilogy". The 2 Hit Singles Were "Try Me. I Know We Can Make It" & "Could It Be Magic?" Giorgio Made His 1st Album Titled "Knights In White Satin". The 2 Hit Singles Were "Knights In White Satin" & "I Wanna Funk With You Tonight". Roberta Kelly Made Her 1st Album For Oasis Records Titled "Trouble Maker". The 2 Hit Singles Were "Trouble Maker" & "Love Power". Roberta Kelly Was Also Produced By Giorgio Moroder & Pete Bellotte. In The Fall Of 1976, Oasis Records Went Out Of Business. Donna Summer, Giorgio & Roberta Kelly Stood By Casablanca Records & Filmworks. Oasis Records Remains An Imprint To Giorgio Moroder. In The Fall Of 1976, Donna Summer Made Her 3rd Album For Casablanca Records & Filmworks Titled "Four Seasons Of Love". The 2 Hit Singles Were "Spring Affair" & "Winter Melody". Giorgio Moroder & Pete Bellotte Were Still Her Producers.
Unsourced material removed from article to here. Thanks! --Mattisse 01:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Funeral Diner

message: this page says FD broke up in 2007,but all of the other sites says they broke up in 2008.i'm gonna change this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirvanarox55 (talk • contribs) 12:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  breakup date 
Talk:Alexandru Dimitrie Xenopol

message: Contributor Dahn wishes to portray Xenopol as an anti-semite, using information that for all we know is biased at best. He cites a link which does not work. Perhaps his ignorance of one of Romania's greatest historians is caused by the proximity of Xenopol and Xenophobia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.68.152.82 (talk • contribs).
He is certainly not a noted anti-semite...this is ridiculous. The page should be overhauled so as to be exactly as the Romanian-language one.
:Sockpuppetry. Dahn 04:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:UltraSPARC T2

message: Any references where the pipeline stage information came from? Thread selection should probably be before fetch. But the way it's shown is still possible, just not the most straight forward to implement.
:The way it is currently listed matches up with diagrams in the article "Niagara 2 Opens the Floodgates" from the Nov 2006 issue of Microprocessor Report.  This is also confirmed in a presentation given at the Fall Microprocessor Forum 2006 by Robert Golla of Sun Microsystems entitled "Niagara2: A Highly Threaded Server-on-a-Chip".--141.212.106.126 19:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:RUB A535

message: I fixed this article, as it was clearly written by someone in the U.S. This isn't a bias, it's just a lack of information on the topic, as it seems the website provided most of the information. As a Canadian, and a frequent user of this product, I fixed up whatever needed to be added, as well as the name of the product itself (It's sold as Rub-A-535, and thus should be titled as it's packaged.)
: Well, I don't want to enter an edit war, but the correct naming of the product is acutally RUB A535. The website of the company itself uses this spelling, and if you look at the boxes on the website of Church and Dwight, it's written RUB*A535. I don't remeber when they changed the looks of the box, but I guess that maybe the old style also used a different spelling ? Anyway, I added a redirect from rub-a-535, to avoid any confusion. By the way, the writer of that article IS canadian ;-) .And the iformation mainly comes from Church and dwight's website because there is a policy that say that any information entered must be verifiable and come from trustable sources. Dread Specter 17:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: I contacted the manufacturers months ago re: the name (Rub A535), but they chose not to respond to my inquiry. 
Does anyone know the origin/reason behind the name? Is it akin to WD40? Or another explanation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.113.228.85 (talk) 20:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Originally called RUB A55, to indicate the 55 iterations before the formula was finalized. However, due to the similarity between “5” and “S”, the “3” was added to satisfy the request of the Quebec government’s language policy at the time (it is thought 3 brothers owned the company at the time of inception) 204.112.46.142 (talk) 11:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Name?
Talk:Ladybug Ladybug (film)

message: Is the "Interpretation" section merely the author's opinion or can it be substatiated? Terms like paranoia are utterly inappropriate in the context of nuclear war.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:80C0:15B8:416:1B79:B364:209E (talk) 12:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation
Talk:Maritime coast range ponderosa pine forest

message: The importance of this article is that there are only about 40 forest types worldwide, about 8 of which are in california.  this is probably the rarest type of forest in california and arguably in the world.  it is also home to a number of endemic endangered species. Busybanker 01:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:The Life Before Her Eyes

message: "has established himself as one of America’s greatest young directors of serious, probing drama." - This is a very subjective statement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WArthurton (talk • contribs) 15:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Statement
Talk:George Weinberg (psychologist)

message: Seems like this article is missing some basic stuff about him: where & when was he born, marital status, etc.  Most such articles have a sidebar giving this basic info. T-bonham (talk) 06:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Basic Info

message: "He has been instrumental in getting the public to recognize its own widespread irrationality toward gays."
This is not even close to neutral language. Perhaps he has had a large influence in shifting public perception of gays/gay culture?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkwoftw (talk • contribs) 05:41, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language/Tone 

message: The information in this article regarding the use of this term disagrees with the article on homophobia itself.  Furthermore, it is internally inconsistent:  first it states that Weinberg coined the term in his 1972 book, then it says he began using the term in 1966.  Which is it?  You can't be using a term before it's been coined.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 22:47, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Britannica seems to credit him with "using the word predominately" in 1972.  This seems to imply that the word appeared before but wasn't a fully developed concept with an analytical meaning prior to Weinberg's book. More needs to be done to clarify this. Jason from nyc (talk) 02:25, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

text: There's a chapter on Weinberg in Before Stonewall and I've added the reference. Jason from nyc (talk) 02:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homophobia? 

message: What is the oldest source we can find regarding statements pertaining to 1965? The only 2 listed here are 2017 obituaries. The NYT only mentions that being the year he gave the speech. Gay Times claimed 1 day later he invented the term the same year he gave the speech even though NYT did not state that at all.
It would be nice to get some primary sources to sort out what NYT and GT are drawing this stuff from. ScratchMarshall (talk) 04:34, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Earliest sources regarding 1965