Talk:HMS Nelson (28)

message: Accorting to this page, copyright on two of those photographs is held by one Ian Butler. Bastie 17:03, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Another (public domain) picture of HMS Nelson

message: The sentence (third paragraph) "The six pom-pom mounts were numbered from M1 (on top of B turret) to M7 at the extreme aft - there was no M2 position - the odd numbers 3 and 4 to the starboard." doesn't make sense; 4 is not an odd number, for example. WeeWillieWiki (talk) 21:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added clarification to this sentence, so it should now make sense. This whole article needs more work but for further information at present you should also read the "Nelson class battleships" & HMS "Rodney" articles where I have significantly enhanced the original authors work.The Dart (talk) 23:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gun mount numbers 

message: : The Italian long armistice was signed between General Dwight Eisenhower and Marshal Pietro Badoglio aboard the Nelson on 29 September.
What is this "Italian long armistice"? The link is dead, and searching for the term on the 'net turns up lots of copy-paste, but no information. It's not the Armistice of Cassibile (1943-09-03)... -- DevSolar2 (talk) 12:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian long armistice? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HMS Nelson (28). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070522081737/http://www.royal-navy.org/warships/period-11/index.php?name=4 to http://www.royal-navy.org/warships/period-11/index.php?name=4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: : I am much intrigued by this story about the unsuccesfull attack of U-56 on the British Home Fleet. I can see in Rohwer Chronology of the war at sea that the Home Fleet was at sea from 23-31 october, busy escorting British iron ore ships from Narvik to England. The Home Fleet returned to Loch Ewe on 31st Oct 1939. So the attack is on the 30th Oct. As the U-56 is a type II boat with 3 torpedo tubes, there are 3 torpedoes launched. One is a miss, 2 hit the Nelson but do not explode. These are facts. There are 2 other aspects which are often mentioned which according to me are urban legend :
:* Churchill and Dudley Pound were aboard the Nelson
:* Zahn was so depressed that Donitz relieved him from active duty and put him in training command instead
: About the first aspect : Churchill and Pound were on the 31st in Loch Ewe to discuss when the Home Fleet could return to Scapa Flow in light of the U-47 attack. I find it highly unlikely that they were aboard, Sea Lords are not at sea were they are cut off from communications, that's the job of Forbes to lead the ships at sea. They have been on a mission to Norway for ten days, impossible that Churchill and Pound were away for such a long time from their command.
: About the second aspect : after this incident, Zahn continued to be in command of the U-56 and executed two more patrols. He left U-56 to commision a bigger boat, the U-69 which indeed you could regard as some training mission, but as the U-56 was a small boat it was the plan all along that these were withdrawn to training flottilas in order to support the expanding U-boat fleet.
: So I'd keep those two aspect in the wikipage, as you can read this urban legend in lots of books, but I would clearly mention what they are : urban legends.
: I am posting this on the talk page of U-56, Wilhem Zahn and HMS Rodney
Klutserke (talk) 19:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attack of U-56 on 30 October 1939 : Churchill&Pound aboard? Zahn relieved of command ?