lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pete Nanos

message: "He was the shortest serving director of the laboratory."
I think this this might be out of date, according to Los Alamos National Laboratory#Directors his successor was directory for 2005-2006, and I think if you count up the months it is less.--203.6.205.131 02:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way it would need to be sourced without WP:SYN, which it wasn't so I removed it per WP:BLP.  Toddst1 (talk) 04:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article only describes two years in the life of an individual who has had a long career. And those two years are described in a highly critical manner. One is left wondering what is the other side of the story. Complexica (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is an open forum.  If you think you can describe Nanos' 2 years at Los Alamos in a different light, go for it.  If you would like to add more material, go for it.  Spruce (talk) 03:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

text: The succeeding director was installed in an acting, interim capacity only, with the goal of finishing out the existing contract.  Therefore the statement about "shortest serving director" is accurate. Spruce (talk) 04:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow - what a WP:COATRACK hatchet-job on the guy, obviously written by a seriously disgruntled lab employee.   In the name of balance and WP:BLP I've trimmed that often poorly sourced, highly-pov material focused on how bad someone thought their boss was at LAN and replaced it with what I think is a much more well-balanced and well-sourced section.  Toddst1 (talk) 13:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Gaius Antonius Hybrida

message: There's no need for every single date in this article to have "BC" tacked on to it. I may have missed a few but ... gees. No professional publication would allow such a constant overuse of the BC (or BCE) tag on dates. It just looks silly. "In 87 BC, Hybrida accompanied Lucius Cornelius Sulla into Greece either as a military tribune or as a legatus. Two years prior, in 89 BC, the Mithridatic Wars had begun due to a dispute between Mithridates VI of Pontus and Nicomedes III of Bithynia over the Roman province of Cappadocia." I don't think the reader has forgotten from the previous sentence that we're discussing BC dates... in that one paragraph (the first one in Mithridatic Wars) there are 8 "BC"s... surely they don't all need to be there! Ealdgyth - Talk 20:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , I reverted your change because I couldn't see a pattern to your removals. I had no clue why you'd just decided to rip out half (or more) of the BCs and leave the rest. One sentence has no BC, the next sentence there is a BC. "CE" doesn't help me understand your change when it's not a simply copy-edit or tidying of prose. I'll go through, leave a single BC per paragraph or section (depends) and remove the rest. Mr rnddude (talk) 20:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  BC...
Talk:Palm-size PC

message: The Palm Size PC platform did not ever support ARM as far as I know and x86 was only supported via a sort of Windows CE simulator that ran specially compiled WinCE programs as Windows NT executables on top of desktop Windows.  Consumer Palm Size PC devices only ever had SH3 or MIPS processors.  It was the Pocket PC 2000 platform release that first added ARM support for PDA form factor Windows CE devices.Tfgbd 02:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the Psion Series 3 palmtops use a x86-compatible CPU and the Psion Series 5 and 7 palmtops use an ARM CPU. 49.195.120.115 (talk) 23:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Architecture

message: :Image:Pspc.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 18:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pspc.jpg

message: Per Handheld PC. Aside from the 1999 James Bond info, it's the non-Wintel
aspect that would be most useful, and *THAT* part is not well sourced. Pi314m (talk) 16:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving/Merging Palm-size PC into Palmtop PC
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Kimchi.sg

message: Moved from nomination -- Mackensen (talk) 02:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First oppose vote and discussion 

message: As Blnguyen has mentioned, I did request Durin to nominate me,  and Xoloz also offered to nominate me only hours before this nomination went live.  Before posting this nomination, I sent a email to Durin explaining my reasons for doing a self-nomination. I believe these reasons should also be mentioned here, as they may have a bearing on your decisions.
#Liability for outcome: If the RfA fails, my nominator won't be guilty for having nominated me; if it passes, it'd have passed solely on the basis of my contributions and my suitability for the tools.
#I've been persuaded by the school of thinking that says, "If you feel you're suitable for the mop, why nominate yourself later than is necessary?"
#Remarks at recent RfAs by Blnguyen  and Tawker  have convinced me that we are facing an acute shortage of admins at certain periods in some areas, especially CAT:CSD.
#The recent departure of Mailer diablo means there's one less admin to take care of closing AfDs. This is one of the areas I anticipate I can be helpful in.
#"Last but not least, you [Durin]'ll be free to research other admin candidates. :-)"
The community may now evaluate these reasons and decide accordingly. Kimchi.sg 04:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this is a self-nomination 

message: I congratualte you on crossing the century. I believe that we are a very mature community - the most vibrant virtual community. Calling a "spade a spade' is not uncivil at all, though I would avoid that - but I have some time called spades spades. We are here to build Best encyclopedia, and not indulege in goody-goddy talk. However, I would always like to see all editors, including me, to be polite and civil at all time. Regards. --Bhadani 16:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Congratulations
Talk:Future Tactics: The Uprising

message: An entry on GAGwiki states that the store Game Crazy will not accept this game as trade-in. What are the reasons for this? Is it even true in the first place? Just curious.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.180.171.1 (talk) 03:23, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Crazy 

message: IGN repeatedly calls this game a tactical role-playing game. Why is this not really the case? SharkD (talk) 06:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: TRPG
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gotem

message: Eiland was originally a farming district of Oordegemsestraat, however the population grew past the Oordegemsestraat due to its location as a commercial crossroads. Eiland is now larger than Oordegemsestraat, and is the largest commercial entity in the region, rivaled only by Gotem?
- CrazyRussian talk/email 02:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Utica Avenue station

message: I chose to remove the information about the other level for a couple of reasons. First, I am not entirely sure that the upper level has platforms, and it definitely does not have tracks; at most, it has trackways. Secondly, the upper level cannot really be considered part of the station; it would not have been part of the Fulton Street Line, but part of the never-built Utica Avenue Line of the IND Second System. Thus, it runs above the current station at an oblique angle approaching 90°. If completed, it would really be a separate station, and any article taking the two as a whole would have to be set up like Times Square-42nd Street (New York City Subway) or 42nd Street-Grand Central (New York City Subway). — Larry V (talk) 02:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other level 
Talk:Skrull

message: I'm preety sure that lucy in the sky married a shape shifting lesbian skrull in Runaways? (damned that soundds stupid)jackchen123
::You mean Xavin?? (JoeLoeb (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Runaways

message: The page is protected. I came very close to blocking several people for edit warring. Please find a consensus on the talk page please. - jc37 05:43, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected 

message: The biography and description appear almost entirely cobbled-together from comic appearances on an assumption of a completely consistent continuity and backstory - but such a high degree of continuity (rather than, e.g., a writer writing whatever happens to work in the story that month) has not been evidenced. Is there anything like an official sourcebook setting this stuff out? - David Gerard (talk) 10:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis and OR 

message: Hello, I'm typing this to let you know that I need help in removing these flaws. There are some flaws in this article as you may have seen already and I want to fix them, but is gonna take time for me to do it alone so that's why I'm typing. Please help me improving this article since it tells an important part in the Marvel Universe.  Penguin7812 (talk) 13:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the article
Talk:List of cemeteries in Budapest

message: I have added the useful information at the top of the list to the Budapest article. BlueValour 02:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that one is missing in this list. --Flominator (talk) 21:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about [[hu:Rákoskeresztúri izraelita temető]]?
Talk:List of Foundation series characters

message: A character missing from the list so far is Asimov's narrator, clearly a fictional persona distinct from the author. If anyone were so inclined to add them, they are discussed in this freely available secondary source:  Cheers, Daranios (talk) 10:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The narrator 

message: To get rid of excessive plot summary information a great amount of content/number of characters was removed from the article. For those interested, the old content can still be seen here.
I believe that some of it could be restored and reused if proper, in this case usually secondary, sources can be provided, and the plot-summary content is balanced by analysis. Donald E. Palumbo's book An Asimov Companion: Characters, Places and Terms in the Robot/Empire/Foundation Metaseries, as well as other sources provided in the deletion discussion, could be used for that by anyone so inclined. Daranios (talk) 10:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That may have been excessive.  For example I tried to follow a link to Bail Channis, which comes here but now with no mention. There may be 41 similar examples.13:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for your additions. It would be great, though, if plot summary could be balanced by commentary from the secondary sources as suggested above. The absence of such commentary almost got this article deleted in the past. Daranios (talk) 07:27, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive removed content

message: Article could use some cleanup and beatification work done, make it a little better.
I'll work on this when I can and will update as I go, but for anyone looking to help here's what should be changed:
- Rather than have each character be it's own section have sections separated by books (moving characters to subsections) and when characters appear in multiple books have a section for characters that are either across multiple books or are mentioned frequently (like how Seldon is mentioned in every book even though he does not necessarily appear)
- Distinguish between major and minor characters, builds on first point currently minor characters are not distinguished from major ones, can be confusing for the reader
- More sources, isn't necessary to have each character or description be sourced in all cases especially if each character is a subsection rather than a section but for descriptions and the like especially when making external comparisons (ie. the section on the Mule when mentioning comparisons to real people from history sources those comparisons)
- Missing characters, not all characters are currently included to my knowledge please add any missing characters, characters that are not part of the foundation series but are part of Asimov's shared universe should not be included as this article is specific to the foundation series.
If there's anything I missed or you disagree with any of my suggestions please mention so here, I realise this may be a large change to the article so feel free to say if you disagree. Kyepedia (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup
Talk:Matthew Goode

message: Was Matthew born in 1978? Hotwine8 02:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthyear 

message: Should someone put something up about what he said to his fans("Suck My Dick" "Grow A Dick")? I think people should know that he can be just as bad as Christian Bale, or Rob Schneider.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.131.95.144 (talk) 23:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What he said 

message: "Also in 2013, Goode co-starred as George Wickham opposite Matthew Rhys in the three-part BBC murder mystery miniseries Death Comes to Pemberley, based on P. D. James' novel of the same name, and a spin-off of the 1995 drama miniseries Pride and Prejudice to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the publication of Jane Austen's novel of the same name."
Is it more of a "spin off" of the 1995 BBC adaptation than any other version?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.155.96 (talk) 00:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Comes to Pemberly- spin off from the 1995 mini series 
Talk:Melvin Dummar

message: I'm thinking of slightly re-wording the paragraph:
*Original:
*Re-worded:
Does anyone think this presents any problems (POV, essay-like, etc)? – AJLtalk 07:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dummar's purported meeting with Hughes

message: How did the LDS Church get tangled up in all this? Was Dummar LDS? Seems like a reasonable guess, just based on the fact that he's from Utah. Hard to see why else the church would be listed in the fake will. --BDD (talk) 16:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hypothetically, if Dummar were making a fake, it would be smart of him to include as a beneficiary somebody with the lawyers to fight for that will.  The LDS Church has a lot of money to fight in court to validate that will, if they had believed it (I gather that they didn't pursue it once the court determined it was a fraud).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.120.221 (talk) 19:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  LDS Church? 

message: He died on Sunday, December 9, 2018 according to sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.189.88 (talk) 13:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death
Talk:Lamhe

message: There was an unregistered editor that blanked a section just because it was "written by a fanatic". I mean, is this seriously an excuse to blank a section for no reason?
Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). This message was left at 03:51, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical acclaim and achievements "sounds like it was written by a fanatic" according to edit 

message: IE. Shahid • Talk2me 12:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review
Talk:Kethu Viswanatha Reddy

message: Kethu Vishwanatha Reddy is a published editor, with some of his works having been reviewed in the Hindu, an important Indian newspaper. I think a person with that much achievement merits an article on Wikipedia.
Besides, he does have 30 exclusive google hits as "Kethu Viswanatha Reddy," and a few more when his name is spelled in other ways. Regards, ImpuMozhi 02:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article seems to be getting a lot of prodding this week... It's rather pointless doing so really, since it's only just returned from an AfD with a keep. We can't have an edit war with the prodding, and an AfD every week. -- 9cds(talk) 11:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am sorry for the nuisance caused to so many people across Wikipedia -- fact is that I have a particularly malignant Vandal on my heels. He follows me around and undoes everything I do, which leads to wheeling reverts. It is not a content dispute or a PROD contest. I am sorry but there is little I can do in the matter. Best regards, ImpuMozhi 14:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  prodding
Talk:Rik Levins

message: User:Irongargoyle has added a notability tag to this article without specifying his reasons here.
The entry fulfills the Biography requirements as he is a comic book artist (with extensive credits () who have been long acknowledged as notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. Aside from that basic fact, he would warrant inclusion as the regular penciller of Captain America (a significantly important American Comic book) for over three years (1991-1994), in which he worked on an important run with writer Mark Gruenwald which contained many storylines and introduced many new characters designed by Levins. I am not familiar with his AC comics runs, but I suspect his work there was similarly significant (if not more so, given his time there was more extensive).
I will remove the tag in if no further justification is given here in the next 48 hours. Hueysheridan 14:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:BBS

message: Being that Bulletin Board System is by far the most common use of the acronym "BBS", I formally suggest we move the disambiguation to a full disambig page and place a direct redir to Bulletin Board System, with  in place.  Absent any objection I'll move in about a week (circa 2008-07-26).  /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 21:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that would be suitable H6a6t6e (talk) 08:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll move it tomorrow since the previous editor obviously forgotten to do it. Llewelyn MT (talk) 21:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal
Talk:Australian Native Plants Society

message: ..um, right. Is this enough? according to Wiki etiquette do you remove the tag or me? if I am mentioning books (but not as references) is it correct to cite the whole book as if it were a reference including ISBN? 
cheers Cas Liber 03:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hit the Floor!

message: *I'm not sure if i missed the boat on this one but i've never considered EPs albums. Ive always assumed that they were deemed something different. So although a minute detail in the article, im goin to see if i can find some sort of refrences that support this idea o mine and then change it. if im right of course if not whatevs. Im merely stating this here to avoid a revert war. not that i expect one or anything, heh. ta ta. ---(chubbstar) 03:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Are EPs albums?
Talk:Dublin Docklands

message: nobody seems to have any info on the dublin docklands and the new u2 tower is it under construction yet???
Its not literally under consrtuction as in builders and cranes etc but work has started, point village has started though  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.192.78.61 (talk) 19:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lay of Havelock the Dane

message: I do not currently have access to a full text of the Lay (I used to and I'm hoping to get one at some point, but I'm curretly moving between Colombia and China so I doubt it will happen soon).  So the summary is based on my memory and secondary sources.  Please update at will if you have better info / access!
Byron Farrow 03:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:Arctic hare

message: 123.201.94.195 (talk) 12:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: - I don't have a clue on what part of the article you want to change and you have not said where it has been found and a source must be provided as well. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 November 2023
Template talk:YouTube

message: Can I use Youtube Handle? Bcxfu75k (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean as a source for WP articles? Or the feature? If it's the former, yes, though a third-party source is preferable. If the latter, WP:NOTFORUM. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The template currently does not support linking to YouTube channels via their handles though it could be modified to support such via something like  (much as it currently supports  and ). —Uzume (talk) 21:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I added handle support with 1136063242. —Uzume (talk) 16:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handle Support 

message: Doesn't the dumb link to YouTube constitute MOS:OVERLINKING for many years already? Just imagine a sane human who doesn't know what YouTube is. — Mike Novikoff 04:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please link to an article where this is a problem. There are new people coming on to the internet every day, and some of them have not heard of YouTube. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The article that I was editing by the time I thought of it was this. Wouldn't these same newbies be confused when they don't know on what link to click? (Even worse: to tap. And even if they click with a mouse, they haven't learned a middle button yet).Not to mention how this irritates the experienced users. — Mike Novikoff 21:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

text:  The overlinking issue can be easily seen with things like Special:WhatLinksHere/YouTube. The solution is not to default to not linking but rather to link to the article via redirects as Module:Citation/CS1 (it was heavily discussed on its talk page; check its archives) and many other linking templates that have followed suite have done. It would also be handy as an alternative (instead of attempting to use tracking categories) to determine which way the template was used by using different redirects for different parameters/YouTube identifiers used by the template. For example, we could make these all into redirects to YouTube and then link to them instead: YouTube channel (identifier), YouTube handle (identifier), YouTube user (identifier), YouTube custom (identifier), YouTube show (identifier), YouTube playlist (identifier), YouTube video (identifier). —Uzume (talk) 22:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a possible resolution. Feel free to work on it in the template's sandbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've effected this suggest change with this edit –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "link=no" by default 

message: It may be beneficial to allow the use of archived links for videos that have been deleted. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive link