lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lucky number

message: The entire article (including the References) has been copied word-for-word from the following link - AbsoulteAstronomy.com. I am not sure if it violates the copyrights or not.
--Bhuvan 17:15, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article states at the end: "There are infinitely many lucky numbers. It is not known whether there are also infinitely many lucky primes..."
Haven't done maths for 20 years but there must be an infinite number of lucky primes, isn't that right?
82.213.248.138 20:06, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we actually can't tell from that statement. For example, we could also say: "There are infinitely many even numbers. It is not known whether there are also infinitely many even primes" (where I have simply replaced "lucky" with "even"). My statement is clearly not true, since there is only one even prime. The two categories are almost completely disjoint. Just because there are an infinite number of prime numbers and an infinite number of lucky numbers doesn't mean that there are an infinite number of lucky primes. N Shar 02:13, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinite Primes 

message: Do lucky numbers form a large set (just like primes)? If not, is there known any upper bound of sum of reciprocals?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wojowu (talk • contribs) 13:12, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says: "Lucky numbers share some properties with primes, such as asymptotic behaviour according to the prime number theorem". This is confirmed in one of the external links http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LuckyNumber.html which says: "Many asymptotic properties of the prime numbers are shared by the lucky numbers. The asymptotic density is 1/ln N, just as the prime number theorem". So the sum of reciprocals diverges like the prime numbers. :oeis:A000959 has more references about lucky numbers. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Largeness" of lucky numbers 

message: I produced, for lucky numbers, a picture analogous to the Ulam spiral.  It appeared to show similar diagonal stripes.  However, a larger spiral with lucky numbers to 200,000 looks considerably more random.  I think I will not bother to upload the picture when my account is verified in a few days.  David Lambert.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.204.253 (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ulam spiral analog 

message: Twin lucky numbers and twin primes also appear to occur with similar frequency.
What is the precise meaning (and source) of this sentence?
Anne Bauval (talk) 06:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequency 

message: Gardiner, Lazarus, Metropolis and Ulam did not suggest to call the defining sieve "the sieve of Josephus Flavius". They suggested this name for another sieve.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.147.5.237 (talk) 15:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the sieve of Josephus Flavius"
Talk:Texas toast

message: "Negro Union for Texas Toast" returns no results on Google
Royce Hailey shows up in the article out of nowhere.  Some Googling shows him to be the inventor of Texas Toast, but he probably needs some kind of intro in the article. 24.205.91.162 01:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In Texas, Texas Toast refers to toasted bread with butter and garlic on each side.  When you buy a loaf of Texas Toast bread, you are buying a loaf of bread with slices twice as thick which you will use to make Texas Toast.  The bread itself is not Texas Toast. 65.68.190.183 (talk) 09:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Texas Toast
Talk:Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad

message: Whoa, that's a big chunk of text that desperately needs a copyedit.  Since it was all added in one edit, I'm a little suspicious of its origins; in other words, it has a slight odor of a copyvio.  But, Googling for key phrases doesn't come up with exact matches, so it may be legit.  Since I can't verify if it is or isn't a copyvio, I'll assume good faith for now.  slambo 17:15, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
I also suspect that this might be a copyvio, but I'm unable to confirm it. I know a good bit of this railroad's history offhand, and the copy seems to be accurate. A cleanup is definitely in order, though.  Siliconwafer 00:30, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Large data dump

message: There are some maps online from 1886 which can be found at:
The second web site includes a full brochre and says that it is available under a creative commons license although given the 1886 date, it should simply be public domain now...  Dspark76 (talk) 01:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps 

message: This edit  appears to be copied from  and needs to be paraphrased.--Lucas559 (talk) 23:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hojack 

message: Even in the 19th century scanned map and timetable provided, the Utica route took a prominent position. By the early decades of the 20th century, under the New York Central, the Main routes, as shown on company timetables, were either the route to Utica or the route to Syracuse. A reference for the claim that Rome was the main line is imperative.Dogru144 (talk) 01:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Rome as Main line is quiet dubious
Talk:Tymoshenko

message: Tymoshenko is a Ukrainian name, but historically has been transcribed from Russian as Timoshenko.  I've consolidated the two at this disambiguation page, with some explanation.  —Michael Z. 2005-05-11 17:17 Z
: I spent the evening listening to Haydamaky and Gogol Bordello, so this page had to be moved.  Zdorov! —Michael Z. 2006-09-19 04:43 Z
::Dobre, but what's the connection of the move to GB? --Irpen 02:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gossypium

message: I've got some cotton seeds (at about 10) and I wanted to plant them on a vase only for display. I was wondering if you could help me telling how many days the seeds need to sprout, how much time it would need to appear the first flowers, the right temperature, if the seed and the plant need special care on something, things like that. It would be interesting to add those to the article too. Thanks a lot for the help. Raquel Sama 17:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plant raising info

message: I learned in a class that this genus is tetraploid. Should this be noted in the article? Ninjatacoshell 17:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps not that unusual. ~70% of grasses are polyploids and ~55% of flowers. And, no, I don't have a reference. Ninjatacoshell 06:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetics 

message: Seems like this should be renamed "Cotton plant".--Doug.(talk • contribs) 04:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name 

message: What is the biological function of the fibers? Do they help the seed travel from the plant, like a dandelion clock? Do they pad it? They're certainly not edible...why did the evolve?165.91.64.144 (talk) 00:55, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: function of fibers
Talk:Pleurodesis

message: I would like to know if there are any risks to a chemical Pleurodesis.  I have an air pocket at the top of my right lung from surgery I had Feb. 28 and has not healed yet.  The chest tube has been in that long also.  
Thanks,
Kathy
Kathy,
The risks may outweigh the benefits.  My daughter experienced excruciating pain during and after the chemical pleurodesis ( with tetracycline)which she elected to try.  
She would not recommend that procedure to anyone. Her recovery from that was more difficult than from earlier surgery.
Her three episodes of Spontaneous Pneumothorax were treated as: 1st occurence, chest tube and observation only, 2nd occurence, small incision surgery to staple bleb. . That surgery seemed to be successful until exactly one year later when she experienced 3rd occurence.  All on right side.
From info we have been able to gather, consult a pulmonologist as well as the surgeon (if it is an emergency room visit and chest tube is really necessary) before you elect surgery and espcially before considering chemical pleurodesis.
We've learned that sometimes a pneumothorax will correct itself, so observation is sometimes an option the surgeon may play down.
Pneumothorax.org is a good website.
Good luck to you!
I know this is outside the scope of what a Talk page is supposed to be, but if it helps somebody who is looking for information, then so be it. My personal experience with surgical pleurodesis did not seem like it was as painful as those who have had the chemical procedure done described their pain. That being said, it was relatively invasive and did require a week long hospital stay before they took the chest tube out. I had three pneumothoraxes, the last one being quite severe. Even though I'm at risk for things like pneumonia, bronchitis or other respiratory infections (which I've never had and it's been 15 years), I would still get the procedure done in a heart beat if I had to. There's nothing more terrifying than suddenly not being able to breathe. Hope that helps. Flatcurve (talk) 19:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:True

message: Why is True auto redirecting to Truth?
Might want a disambigous page w/ also links to True in terms of other things, (I came looking for Computer Science related info) --ORBIT 18:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: :"Read the article truth. ...  Banno 07:56, July 10, 2005 (UTC)"
Been there, done that, got the T shirt, and I have questions about it. 8^)
How about clearing up something for me today, Banno, concerning that article? How can you presume to write about TRUTH (meaning a statement that is true) without first stipulating to the meaning of the more basic term, TRUE (in general usage generally taken to mean "In accord with the actual state of affairs")? Would it be possible for one to explain the term, 'fourth' to a visitor from another planet without first explaining the more basic term, 'four'?
:This is an encyclopedia, not a forum. Please do not delete material from the talk pages. Banno 09:56, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
My apologies. Now will you please answer the question?
:I, and others, have - in the archive you claim to have read. 
You mean your screed of theist obscurantism in your article, Truth?  Nothing there answers the my question.
:Again, this is not a forum. Banno 23:24, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
So you can publish whatever screed of theist obscurantism you please, and it is never open to question? What are these talk pages for then?
:Certainly not for feeding Trolls. Enough. Banno
Another case of the pot calling the kettle black. 67.182.157.6 01:39, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hint: It is only disputed by those who are [[obscurantist]].

message: There are at current two other articles that relate to the name "True" -- True (taxonomy) and True (album) (Which, ironically enough, are a redirect and disambiguation page respectively)
So... shouldn't this be a disambiguation, with an option to go to Truth, rather than a redirect? Or at least give a disambig option in the Truth article? Lilinka 16:11, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Since there are several uses of the word "true", I have turned the redirect page into a disambiguation page. --Ixfd64 19:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation page
Talk:Ælfgifu (wife of Eadwig)

message: There seem to be at least two Elgivas:
One (d. 944) was the mother of Edwy of England (whose page lists both his mother and his wife for this name, each linking to this page.) and of Edgar of England; she was the wife of Edmund I of England, and had the title of Queen of England.  She is also considered a saint.
The other was the wife of Edwy of England.
An alternate form of the name is Æthelgifu.
Not sure how to go about making a disambiguation page.  --Magda 18:24, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There may not just be two people by the name of Elgiva, but Elgiva is a short form of both Aelfgiva/Aelfgifu and Aethelgiva/Aethelgifu.  Since the names would have been written down in their Latin form, it may be difficult to know which name Elgiva referred to.  Thus, when you check your sourses, see if you only see one of Elgiva's names or both used to refer to the same person. 23:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not just two Elgivas

message: Queen until 958 or 959? (both dates are in the article) --Againme (talk) 15:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates coherence
Talk:Tracy Grammer

message: Hooray for a Tracy Grammer page!  Maybe some mention of Jim Henry is in order, since he is her current touring partner and, in Tracy's own words last time I saw her at Club Passim, "it looks like it's going to be a long-term relationship."  I don't want to hop in and edit anything since you're probably working on it right now.  --amysayrawr 18:26, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
:No, no, please, go for it. And thanks for the catch with Flower of Avalon. Not sure how I spent a month misreading that. Amorpheous 18:30, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hooray for a Tracy Grammer page!

message: Were she and Dave Carter married to each other or just musical partners?
:There is some discussion of this at Talk:Dave Carter in response to your post there.  Lets not start another discussion here on the same topic. -MrFizyx 23:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: relationship to Dave Carter 

message: Is this article linked to the correct John Jennings? Selection listed at John Jennings (disambiguation) Ian3055 20:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this John Jennings is not yet on the disambig, he's this one, and really should have an article.  Don't know when I'd get to it though.  I think it was a red link here until not too long ago. -MrFizyx 21:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: John Jennings

message: If no one can supply a photo of the singer alone, then why not copy the one at Dave Carter & Tracy Grammer ? 202.179.22.106 (talk) 03:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Wikipedia talk:Wikibreak

message: When you are temporarily taking a break from specific article(s) due to annoyance about certain things, or to calm down after a consensus was reached you didn't agree with, but still editing articles generally on Wikipedia, is that still called a wikibreak? I know we have the term "semi-wikibreak" but it's not clear from the page if that's referring to the same thing. I think a semi-wikibreak might just mean you're spending less time on Wikipedia than before, not that you have consciously decided to pause editing specific article(s). Is there a term for that? Kidburla (talk) 08:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taking a break from specific article(s) 

message: The redirect Wikipedia:RFZ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Q𝟤𝟪 09:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wikipedia:RFZ]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Randall Woodfield

message: William Bergen Greene was convicted in 2005 of the 1979 murder of Sylvia Durante. The entire paragraph should be vetted and rewritten.
Citation: http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2002169032_greeneverdict03m.html
'very handsome young man' -> 'young man' for POV reasons. 66.62.175.125 18:41, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Delete above: have no idea who this person is and don't see how their locker location illuminates the mind or actions of Randall Woodfield. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Leonurus (talk • contribs) 11:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  had a locker across from William Sprinkle 

message: I fail to see the connection between the California Freeway Killers, Delaware's Steven Pennell, and Randall Woodfield. 47.137.190.123 (talk) 08:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: See also
Talk:Sega Sammy Holdings

message: sega sammy holdings has been canceled and has been shut down for  good!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.30.142.218 (talk) 15:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ss 

message: In places, so I added the promo tag. Some language can be more neutral. Balle010 (talk) 17:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed it needs a rewrite badly.  It might be one I’m willing to take on down the road a little ways, seeing as how Sega can provide a lot to build this one up. Red Phoenix talk 17:10, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article's written like an advertisement
Talk:Ragman (character)

message: I would like it if there was a section describing the pre-Crisis origin of Ragman for completeness, even though it's not in the current DC canon. Kronocide 02:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's reasonable since the pre-Crisis version was about as well used as the post-Crisis version. Also other characters have the variants, either due to Crisis type events or company mergers, included in the main article Someone would have to re-write the character history section so that it falls into the two sub-categories though.   J Greb 19:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't understand why my paragrah on the Rag-Man was deleted, as he has the same name as the Ragman but was an earlier character who originate in the 1940s comic CAT-MAN.  His name was Jay Garson Junior, and he was a mystery writer who faked his  own murder and assumed the Rag-Man identity to bring the culprits to justice.Tnarrud3 (talk) 00:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre-Crisis Origin

message: Based on the entry for golem, Ragman does not seem to fit within that category. If I understand the revised origin correctly, the suit was created as a replacement to the golem as a guardian. It was to be a tool as opposed to an autonomous entity.
Is this a valid enough reason to eliminate the category link?  J Greb 19:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss-inclusion in the Golem category? 

message: Not really. The Thing, Magneto, Kitty Pryde, Doc Sampson, Iceman (I think), Batwoman, Atom, Dr. Manhattan etc. Stan Lee himself was Jewish.  --Enigma328 (talk) 01:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "one of a limited number of Jewish superheroes"?
Talk:DESY

message: I did the best I could with merging DESY and Desy. Please check their page histories and feel free to add something that I might have missed. In the current version, there's some ambiguity with the term "ministry". If someone could fix up that sentence, that would be great! --HappyCamper 19:09, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge completed

message: So as promised I am in the process of updating, ordering and correcting articles about or relating to  DESY. I have worked my way through some articles about its facilities and history and put suggestions for new / edited content on the respective talk pages. It would be cool to get feedback for these! They are:
* TASSO
* JADE (particle detector)
* PLUTO
I've published the edits for Positron-Electron Tandem Ring Accelerator and created a draft for a new article on DORIS, which can be checked out here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Redactrice_at_DESY/sandbox/DORIS_(particle_accelerator)#DORIS_%28particle_accelerator%29
Any feedback on content, form or etiquette very welcome. Redactrice at DESY (talk) 12:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: PS same request posted on WT:PHYS Redactrice at DESY (talk) 12:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update: for edits proposed on talk pages, first published edits, new article proposal about DORIS
Talk:Demographics of Norway

message: These tables feel more like they should be singular table instead, or even better; a graph like the ones above.
The Total Fertility Rate article is only linked in the 5th table, which seems messy.
I could probably make some kind of graph on my own but I'm kind of unsure what to do about this other than point it out.
Jesper2k (talk) 17:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding "Total fertility rate from 1850 to 1899" tables
Talk:Olympus (Lycia)

message: Congratulations, JustSomeKid, on the tidying, and yes some of the previous text did seem to come from a tourist leaflet,and yes about the prosaicness of methane too. However the final part describing Olympos mitos otel as it is today, as a hippy resort etc., is just factual observation and quite encyclopaedic. I don't think our descriptions should stop at some arbitrary time in history before modern times, so I think it or most of it should go back.
TobyJ 20:02, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Praise 

message: I just noticed that the article seems to be attributing the quote "The summit however, the beautiful pyramid of Solyma 7,800 feet high, where in the snow, the legends say, the roses blossom, and groans are heard to summon the Muslims to Paradise, is not visible from the Chelidonian cape" to Homer which couldn't possibly be true because of the lack of Muslims during Homer's time.  Also, it seems to creative writing more than encyclopedic writing and it doesn't really provide any relevant information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shibbyman (talk • contribs) 08:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The juxtaposition of "Muslims" with "Homer" is unfortunate, but could be put right. However, with User:Shibbyman in  suggesting complete deletion as unencyclopedic.--Old Moonraker (talk) 08:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange quote 

message: Right now this article claims to be partially about the national park, but in practice focuses on the ancient city. We need to create a new article for the national park in my opinion. AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 13:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is exactly what I've done this afternoon, followed by some other significant changes. --AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be separated to articles for city and national park 

message: This needs to be here.  But, we need to be careful that this is not use for advertisement, as it may have been in the past.  If anyone can name the other mountain range that holds the valley, please add it.  For now we only know the name of Omurga / Çamoda.  
Cayyolu76 (talk) 09:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added section about modern Olympos
Talk:List of the most spoken native languages

message: I strongly disagree with the renaming of this page. The whole point of splitting the table into its own page was to keep the 1% table of languages by country distinct from the List of languages by total speakers. Now that this page has been renamed, we're going to have two pages with similar names, and that is just going to confuse people. --Arcadian 19:34, 11 May 2005 (UTC)