Talk:Neoconservatism and paleoconservatism

message: The current article name has a number of issues:
* The spacing before and after the dash in the name is awkward.
* The capitalization of the term paleoconservatism is incorrect since it isn't the first word in the article title.
* I believe there are multiple conflicts and the title should reflect this.
Also, I would prefer having the term "Conflicts" first in order to not give either of the term political branches significant precedence over the other.  Thus I propose the above suggested name change.  Thoughts?
--70.48.243.22 01:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose rename: [[Conflicts between neoconservatism and paleoconservatism]]

message: I gather from this that the views concerning Jewish people or Israel are a major, maybe even the major, difference between the two groups. Is that the right impression of the article? Is that issue really so central? I guess I thought paleocons were just generalized isolationists while neocons were "spread the American ideal abroad" type people.--T. Anthony 04:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you're really wrong.  But as Time magazine's Joe Klein pointed out in the article on neoconservatism, there does seem to be a very strong Jewish influence in neoconservatism, which has perhaps made it more (ultra)Zionist (and particularly Likudnik) in orientation than might otherwise be the case.  With that said, paleocon isolationism is forced to dwell on such issues, by simple virtue of the fact they are the ones presently being contested.  If the neoconservatives were largely dominated by a clique of Irish Catholics who wanted to wage war on the United Kingdom, in order to bring the blessings of liberty to the people of Northern Ireland, for example, then paleocons would be forced to address that, instead. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 17:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question?

message: Little is made of old paleoconservativism and its pro-immigration stances, which are now neolibertarianism. I think this should be corrected.--12.227.237.140 (talk) 04:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barry Goldwater 

message: This entry is biased against Paleo-Conservatives. It alleges Anti-Jewish sentiment. That's a bunch of bunk. I have zero against Jews. I have much against the Bush Doctrine. 
Needs to be cleaned up.
K8cpa (talk) 00:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entry is biased... 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Neoconservatism and paleoconservatism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060829122103/http://www.newcriterion.com:80/constant/books/betrayal/betrayintro/ to http://www.newcriterion.com/constant/books/betrayal/betrayintro/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061004162259/http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org:80/Chronicles/January2001/0101RoundTable.htm to http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/Chronicles/January2001/0101RoundTable.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061007012132/http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org:80/Chronicles/July2004/0704Richert.html to http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/Chronicles/July2004/0704Richert.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061023031539/http://www.commentarymagazine.com/Summaries/V82I5P23-1.htm to http://www.commentarymagazine.com/Summaries/V82I5P23-1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Neoconservatism and paleoconservatism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060106021320/http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/Chronicles/September2003/0903Francis.html to http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/Chronicles/September2003/0903Francis.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Neoconservatism and paleoconservatism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://columbia.edu/~cf27/pubs/nisbet60.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1996/vo12no16/vo12no16_invasion.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070429130925/http://novaemilitiae.squarespace.com/periodic-musings-blog/2006/7/11/the-traditionalist-conservatives-revolt-against-modernity.html to http://novaemilitiae.squarespace.com/periodic-musings-blog/2006/7/11/the-traditionalist-conservatives-revolt-against-modernity.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cofcc.org/foundation/neoconservatism.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.englishfirst.org/puerto/puertonypost.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020722&s=foer072202
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neoconservatism and paleoconservatism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070611182031/http://fpri.org/pubs/orbis.4703.ryn.ideologyamericanempire.pdf to http://fpri.org/pubs/orbis.4703.ryn.ideologyamericanempire.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Basing half an article on a single source seems a bit much. I think you need a little more than a Redstate article to determine all the differences between neocons and paleocons. (Not to mention that it seems to have it in for the neocons.) Costatitanica (talk) 20:37, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Redstate Article is being stretched rather thin