lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Biomolecular structure

message: This article is exclusively about structure prediction, not RNA structure in general.
Interesting facts related to RNA structure, but not prediction specifically, include:
Depending on the structure, a given RNA molecule will have regions of relatively high or low accessibility.  For mRNA, highly accessible regions are more sensitive to RNA-interference (RNAi).
Highly structured RNA slows and causes ribosomal pausing during translation (See Farabaugh, P. J. Programmed translational frameshifting. Microbiol. Rev. 60) (See  Wen, J. D. et al. Following translation by single ribosomes one codon at a time.) 
However, we already have a List of RNA structure prediction software, and we also have a section in the RNA article called Structure [], which mention secondary structure.
So, I guess the question is, what do we want this article to be about?
--Adamuu (talk) 17:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections other than prediction 

message: This article was moved from RNA structure as a result of a proposal at WT:MCB.  RNA structure now redirects to Nucleic acid structure instead.
A number of redirects have been changed to point here (most notably Primary structure, Secondary structure, Tertiary structure, and Quaternary structure).  Editors may want to consider redirecting these wikilinks to point to the appropriate protein or nucleic acid whateverary structure article instead.  Antony-22 (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive reorganization of biomolecular structure articles

message: PLEASE EXPAND ARTICLE: INCLUDE ACCUARATE DIAGRAMS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridem92 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 13 October 2010
:Do you have any specific requests? This general sort of criticism isn't terribly helpful as it could be applied to any Wikipedia article.--Paul (talk) 12:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand request 

message: in the image lengend "6TNA 6TNA​" url is broken  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.1.209.51 (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link
Talk:Commonwealth Games (The Goodies)

message: I added the section Discovery of Missing Segment, after I read about it in the In Brief section of 'Memento,' a publication of the National Archives of Australia, published in July 2010. You can read 'Memento' here; http://www.naa.gov.au/about-us/publications/memento/index.aspx I don't own the DVDs, so I don't know if the segment has been added to the DVD version as a bonus, nor if it has been added to the version of the Commonwealth Games (Goodies episode) in syndication. Eligius (talk) 12:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery of Missing Segment
Talk:Farm Fresh Food (The Goodies)

message: Why is teh quote section there?  What encyclopedic purpose does it serve?  Per Wikipedia:Quotations#Overusing quotations, this does not seem pertinent to the article and there is no critical commentary about the quote to explain why it is the article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The quote section was intended to show the humour of the Goodies.  The comments in the quote section have now been incorporated into the plot. Figaro (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote section
Talk:The Goodies Rule – O.K.?

message: The character that Tim fights with is not a 'Sesame Street' character. It highly resembles H.R. Pufnstuf which had been shown on UK TV in the past.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul The Wazzock (talk • contribs) 22:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Sesame Street' character 

message: where does the phrase "<somethings> rule, ok?" come from? It appears in lots of British entertainment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.97.180 (talk) 07:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  memes rule, ok?
Talk:Kenneth M. Taylor

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 19, 2008, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Pass
:2. Factually accurate?: Pass
:3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
:4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
:5. Article stability? Pass
:6. Images?: Pass
A very will written article, superbly referenced and a fun read. I flushed it out with a few categories but otherwise it is an example of some of the best work I've seen from the WPMILHIST task force.  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.</div>— MrPrada (talk) 18:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for reviewing the article and adding the cats. Good work to those that started the article. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination

message: In the paragraph describing Taylor's second engagement, it is first stated that he and his wingman found themselves tangled up with a group of "Zekes," and then immediately goes on to say that Taylor was wounded by a rear-seat gunner.  The engagement supposedly ends when the Japanese break off to return to their carrier.  A "Zeke" is a single-place fighter, with no rear-seat gunner, so either the type of Japanese aircraft is wrong or the sequence of events is confused--of this I am certain.  I also think it unlikely, though not impossible, that half a dozen Japanese fighter pilots would leave the scene in the face of two P-40s, which they probably knew they could out-maneuver.
Can this be clarified?
Terry J. Carter (talk) 16:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I clicked on Talk for the same reason. As the first hit is described as exploding, that limits it to a single possibility, the 20mm guns of the Zero. None of the Japanese aircraft involved carried explosive rounds for rear guns, at least as far as I am aware. This statement is definitely wrong, but none of the references are readable online. Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Statement on Japanese Aircraft Types 

message: Although Taylor frequently claimed that he probably got four kills, he was officially credited with two. Officially credited kills is the number to use.
Ray@Panko.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.146.16 (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Kills
Talk:Saturday Night Grease

message: Didn't Mary Whitehouse become really annoyed with this episode because of the carrot on the front of Tims underpants?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.151.68 (talk) 11:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes :) Figaro (talk) 11:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Cefpodoxime

message: Does Cefpodoxime Proxetil having any Polymoprhs,If so name the polymorphs ,in advanse wishes to them who helped me out of this problem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.18.119.107 (talk) 06:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Cefpodoxime proxetil -Polymorphism''' 
Talk:Cefapirin

message: I believe the IUPAC Name should be
(6R,7R)-3-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-8-oxo-7-{[(pyridin-4-ylsulfanyl)acetyl]amino}-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid
--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 01:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 19:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUPAC Name
Talk:Cefprozil

message: The CAS number listed agrees with a structure with undefined E/Z stereo. Check the stereo for the ring. I believe the IUPAC name is (6R,7R)-3-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-8-oxo-7-{[(pyridin-4-ylsulfanyl)acetyl]amino}-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChemSpiderMan (talk • contribs) 03:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUPAC Name and Structure
Talk:Bike-engined car

message: I don't have a problem with removing unsourced list items, but we have plenty of good sources, not to mention full articles, on the Westfield Megabusa and others listed here. Wikipedia has no special bias for or against production anything. Per WP:PRODUCT, production cars or other manufactured goods must have reliable sources and notability to merit articles. Being "production" isn't a special status on Wikipedia, and numerous production cars and motorcycle articles have been deleted at AfD for lack of sustained, in-depth coverage. Non-production goods aren't second-class. If there's sources, and notability to boot, it's good content. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 07:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation. In hindsight, I agree that they are worth including. Sorry for removing them. Thanks for adding the extra references. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 09:37, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reason to exclude non-production cars
Talk:Cross Jurisdictions

message: *Merge Seems uncontroversial. I have adjusted the merge links so the other one points here as there isn't anything else competing for this name space. (Emperor 03:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Think it's worth mentioning that Grissom got the facts wrong here? Or is that just petty? cyclosarin (talk) 06:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ketoacidosis

message: I noticed that this article is tagged for notability.  Generally, an episode of one series that serves as a pilot for a spin-off series is considered notable for that very reason.  Why should this article be any different?  John Darrow (talk) 05:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:American Society of Genealogists

message: The ASG is a scholastic honorary society composed of not more than 50 living Fellows. It is not a commercial enterprise; its members are the strongest writers and some of the soundest professional researchers in the field. I am not a member, but am simply working to get the page up, and underway.
Strude86 03:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: comment: it seems a start as a stub. If nothing isw added it can later be deleted, so I am moving to a prod. DGG 09:47, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shishi-odoshi

message: The section on pop-culture could stand to be expanded, as this device is seen in anime or Japanese live-action pretty much any time the setting is a garden or onsen. Frequently, a shot of this device making its noise is used to punctuate some dramatic or comedic event that has just happened, in the way a rimshot might be used to punctuate a joke. I don't yet know of any cite-worthy source to explain all this in the page itself, though. I suppose I'll just have to keep looking. —Robotech_Master (talk) 20:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in Japanese media
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 7, 2006

message: The image is non-free and no longer used.  Please remove it.  --Iamunknown 03:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done ^demon[omg plz] 06:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks.  --Iamunknown 06:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rufous hornero

message: I think it would be appropriate to mention the regional names given to this bird.  For example, the Brazilian name is "João de Barro" (literally, Clay John).  Is there any set format for adding this information to the article?  --Lance E Sloan (talk) 15:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazilian name? 

message: First of all, Rufous hornero is not the national bird of Uruguay. Actually, the national bird of Uruguay is the southern lapwing. And second, I suggest this article to be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in the Spanish Wikipedia. --200.117.40.43 (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  National bird and expansion
Talk:Proterospongia

message: I am trying to get the citations to link to the references below without duplicating. Choanoflagellate 23:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See this. Real96 23:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I still can't get it to turn out the way I want. I would like to have each reference listed below once and each time I cite it in the text it gives the approriate number. For example if I use reference "3" six times I want it to use "3" each time and list it in the reference section only once. I have looked at the structure of some pages such Jabba The Hut, but I can't get this page to behave that way. Thanks 69.107.135.214 14:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The first time that you link to a reference, write it as text of reference; subsequent times, write < ref name="name_here" />. (Note the position of the slashes; many people mess that up.) Of course, you should use a more descriptive name for the reference than name_here (use the same name each time for the reference you're repeating, and a different name for different references). Hope that helps! --ais523 14:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Curtiss Hawk

message: This page started as a simple plan to organize the Curtiss Model names. 10 hours later it became this rather long list. I hope it helps people find the Hawk Aircraft they are looking for out of all the choices of designations. And all I really wanted to do was add a link to the Curtiss F11C Goshawk page. --Colputt 04:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job putting this together. I fixed some redirects for you: The SC Seahawk already exists, while the F6C Hawk page exists as a redirect to P-1 Hawk. I left F6C Hawk as a redirect as I assume you might be planning on an article on the F6C soon. (There is NO info on the P-1 Hawk page about the F-6C, so a new article on the F6C would probably be the best way to go. - BillCJ 15:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I do like how Piotr Mikołajski adjusted the formatting, it looks much better now. I had tried about three diffrent methods, none looked as good as this one. I agree the F6C should be a seperate page the F6C had a radial engine vs the Vee of the P-1 and was intended for USMC use. I'll look into it. --Colputt 15:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is now finished from where I sit. --Colputt 09:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation
Talk:Shadow Riders (Yu-Gi-Oh! GX)

message: After all, Darkness is the final antagonist in the series-- shouldn't he have his own page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.12.192.193 (talk) 17:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, wiki standards probably do not warrant a page although I do find the character notable. Red Director (talk) 01:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Darkness
Template talk:Infobox Cricket World Cup

message: No 'Man of the Series' was awarded in1975, 1979, 1983 and 1987. The first was awarded in 1993. The award was changed to 'Player of the Tournament' in 1999 and then to 'Player of the Series' in 2003 - Ctbolt 04:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Player of the Series
Talk:Mail and plate armour

message: The term seems made up in English, though the 3 mentioned armors are linked at the reference and referred to as plates or scales embedded in or attached to each other with "chain" links.
So, then the question is whether these are all types of armor made from plates embedded in chain mail, or whether the article should be reworded).  Beyond what I've done, I'm leaving this to another. 69.243.168.118 07:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that the article's scope includes all form of armour that consist of plates embedded in mail. The title is somewhat debatable, and I'd welcome a scholarly opinion on the name. --Eyrian 08:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I haven't really read up on wikipedia policy as to direct translation of terms between languages, but this seems a good way of doing it to me. 69.243.168.118 08:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Plated" mail 

message: these pictures from commons:
image:Cote_de_maille_Jazeran_1.JPG|:image:Cote_de_maille_Jazeran_1.JPG maille normande servant de base aux autres mailles
image:Cote_de_maille_Jazeran_2.JPG|:image:Cote_de_maille_Jazeran_2.JPG Maille jaseran 
image:Cote_de_maille_Jazeran_3.JPG|:image:Cote_de_maille_Jazeran_3.JPG Maille jaseran différente 
image:Cote_de_maille_Jazeran_4.JPG|:image:Cote_de_maille_Jazeran_4.JPG Maille jaseran différente
does any body know is this a real eropean armour or not? just I've never herad about that kind of armour existed in Europe. However they looks the same as japanese kusari and kikko  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.115.54.148 (talk) 14:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've asked experts and send 'em to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Fantasy_Armour as DnD armour  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.115.55.236 (talk) 12:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what are they? 

message: The reference added about plated mail being invented by Geber seems odd. The book referenced does not seem to be about weapons and the article on Geber does not mention this invention (or any work on arms). Geber worked in the 8th century but the first pieces of plated mail note are from the 15th century. Also plated mail was not used for shields or helmets. Your help in cleaning up this reference would be appreciated. Mercutio.Wilder (talk) 04:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Geber]] 
Template talk:WikiProject South America

message: Hmm, I don't thin the pic of Machu Picchu generally describes South America... would be more suitable if a map of the area is placed instead. --I am greener than you! (Lima - Charlie - Over) 02:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that the map that was used was so dark as to be near illegible. If you have a better one, suggest it. Chris 02:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: This is the version I propose.. having a pic of machu picchu is politically incorrect!--F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 19:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: proposal

message: There is an updated template at Template:WikiProject South America/sandbox which uses WPBannerMeta. Any objections to using it? -- WOSlinker (talk) 17:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version of template
Talk:Sue Gordon

message: I was drawn into editing this excellent article by a couple of ordinary typos but then noticed there was some uncertainty about when to use cap initials for, eg, 'state' and 'aboriginal'. We were taught in school to distinguish between a common noun (uncapitalised) and a proper noun which is always capitalised in English. It is a rule of printing practice that a spelling standard should be applied consistently throughout a document. Therefore, because I saw 'aboriginal' more often than 'Aboriginal', I standardised for the former. However, I then looked at Australia's official Style Manual Style Manual for Authors, Editors and Printers of Australian Government Publications (3rd Edn) AGPS Canberra 1978.
:"When referring to the first inhabitants of Australia, prefer the forms Aboriginal (singular noun), Aboriginals (plural noun) and Aboriginal (adjective). While the form Aborigine is not acceptable as an alternative to Aboriginal for the singular noun, Aborigines may be used as an alternative plural form. These words should be dignified with a capital letter in the same way as Maori, Negro and Red Indian [emphasis added]. 
I find it hard to argue with that ruling. The protocol is also well covered in the Wikipedia article Indigenous Australians, under 'Definitions'. In the case of 'state', there can be 
little difficulty in distinguishing its common vs proper uses, even in the hallowed WA term "eastern states". However, some Australian newspapers have adopted the standard State for the political entity. Newspapers generally assume a mental age of 14 in their readers (:-).Bjenks 02:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation 
Talk:American Youth Soccer Organization

message: Since no one else has done so, I thought I'd start up a talk page.
So far, I've made a few minor edits to the article, but I'd like to expand the Philosophy section to explain each of the principles in more detail, as well as rearrange some of the sections into a more logical sequence--Structure first, then Philosophy and Programs, followed by History (which should be expanded, as well).
What do y'all think?
Chris Allen 04:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AYSO Talk Begins!

message: This article is written like a promotional brochure (and was probably copied from one). Tragic romance (talk) 07:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of article

message: Just because players began their recreational soccer career with AYSO does not make them "alumni." That word suggests that the named players played their entire youth careers with AYSO and graduated from AYSO to play directly in college or professionally. Nearly all the players mentioned as alumni left AYSO at an early age to play competitively for youth soccer clubs: Donovan played with Cal Heat; Foudy played for the Mission Viejo Soccerettes; Boxx played for Torrance United Waves Soccer Club; Ching played for the Honolulu Bulls Soccer Club; Morgan played for Cypress Elite. Not sure about the others. 138.115.142.72 (talk) 14:21, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni
Talk:List of Brisbane Broncos representatives

message: Gavin Allen's in there as representing Queensland in 1995, but I thought no Broncos played state of origin that year because they were aligned with Super League. How did he become the exception?--Jeff79 04:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Super League

message: Can we verify that he played for SL Australia? His article doesn't mention it.--Jeff79 20:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Ryan 

message: Can I get a feel for what others think of this page being merged into the Brisbane Broncos Players article, as a section? I think it's a pretty logical idea.--Jeff79 (talk) 05:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: DO NOT add to this list before a player has actually played in a representative match this year.--Jeff79 (talk) 12:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Representing 
Talk:Simon J. Ortiz

message: I've just written this as a new entry, and can't complete this right now as I'd like to. The sorely lacking section is "literary career"--I know the info there probably would be better off elsewhere, but I've left it for the time being. The last part needed for this article is a summary of Ortiz' most important works and their mark on Native lit. Your help with this would be most appreciated as I don't feel qualified to write a good general commentary on that as I haven't read enough of his work. Man, do we need help here w/ Native writers...I was shocked to find no entry for someone as prominent as Ortiz, and there are many others who have no greatly-deserved article. Let's do it, people! Efrafra 06:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs expansion on literary career/works
Talk:Rajendra Krishan

message: Dates active and date of death needs to be reconciled. 125.236.138.249 (talk) 10:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:HSC-7

message: Back in 1981, just after leaving the Sarratoga (CV-60), HS-7 was called the "Shamrocks" then was renamed "Dusty Dogs" in 1982 prior to sailing on a Med/IO cruise with the JFK (CV-67), and renamed again to "Shamrocks" in 1983 prior to heading back to Lebanon. Back then we used the SH-3H Sea King. Looking at this article it seems they were once again renamed to "Dusty Dogs" sometime in the last 20 years or so. --Colputt 05:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Advanced and retracted tongue root

message: I'd love to hear sound samples here. —vivacissamamente (talk) 05:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I find the Fante Chart confusing. Wouldn't something along these lines be better? Putting it here first in case there's a good reason for it be formatted as it is. 
 Fante ±ATR vowels
Ortho-graphy	+ATRvalue	Approx. Europeanequivalent	−ATRvalue	Approx. Europeanequivalent
i           	         	                          	         	
e           	         	                          	         	
ɛ           	         	                          	         	
a           	         	                          	         	
ɔ           	         	                          	         	
o           	         	                          	         	
u           	         	                          	         	
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewmorrone1 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fante Chart Confusing