lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Generation II reactor

message: Is the first sentence meant to read 'evolutionary' as opposed to revolutionary?
There is no such thing as a en II or Gen I. Gen IV was dubbed by the DOE for developing new plant types in 2000 . In 2003 the French CEA was referring to Gen II types in Nucleonics Week, "Etienne Pochon, CEA director of nuclear industry support, outlined EPR's improved performance and enhanced safety features compared to the advanced Generation II designs on which it was based." (Vol. 44, No. 39; Pg. 7) . But The first thing there was was Gen IV. The rest is a ex-post fabrication. -- Eiland (talk) 09:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Rashid Patel

message: Wisden apparently mentions that Patel "chased Lamba all the way to the boundary", and Cricinfo quotes it at every opportunity. I have not seen it mentioned in sources closer to home (but I haven't checked too many either). Though logic is not given much importance in Wikipedia, it seems unusual that a batsman protected by a bat, pad and helmet could be chased away by a bowler who is armed with only a wicket. Patel's official defence that he "only hit Lamba's bat three times" would have been blown away had he chased him "all the way to the boundary". I would wait for a better (contemporary and preferably Indian) source before adding anything along the lines suggested by Wisden/CI Tintin (talk) 05:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The race
Talk:Vilma Bánky

message: 'It is said that Valentino was fascinated by Vilma, and it was he who chose her as the first lady in the films and Ronald Colman in a series of love stories...'
Not clear. Did Valentino suggest that she play opposite Colman? Valetude (talk) 01:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing statement 

message: I have added the consensus of secondary sources (Lonchit).  The primary sources cited have no means of clearly linking with Vilma Bánky, and perhaps should be removed as WP:Original research.  The only books I could find using the alternative surname were published 2010 and 2013 and my be based on this article. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We do have "Vilma Banky Konsics" 2007 (Encyclopaedia Hungarica), and "Konsics Vilma" 1978 (Films in Review - Volume 29 - Page 127). All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  How could she be born with the surname Lonchit if her parents were János (later John; 1875-1948) and Katalin (née Ulbert) Koncsics (1880-1947)?? Quis separabit? 22:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth name

message: Why would there be an accent on her name when it was never used in WP:Reliable sources in English? BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 00:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Accent
Talk:Dan Schutte

message: What does that mean? He isn't a priest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.250.141.254 (talk) 19:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Entered the Jesuits" 

message: What about this, used as a RS in another WP article? : 
Sanchez, Mary (2018-03-19). ""Militant" anti-gay activist seeks to divide Catholic flock". Dayton Daily News. Retrieved 2019-02-26.
 The man himself is less welcome. The renowned composer has been disinvited from a scheduled April 28 concert. That alone is shocking, as the lyrical, soothing tones of his work are heard in churches nationwide. The reasons for his disinvitation differ depending on whom you wish to believe...
Etc. Zezen (talk) 08:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexual church politics?
Talk:KWXY

message: I'm a former active contributor and administrator.  I left word at the Teahouse regarding what is now my personal involvement with KWXY.  I'd like to return to editing and this is a good way for me to do it, but I don't want to have any COI issues and I'm not getting paid to make the changes.  I'd like to make corrections regarding the purchase price, the name of the company (IVOX MEDIA, LLC in all caps) and some of the major names who will be involved with the project, including programming by Wink Martindale, The Reverend Horton Heat, Bob Montague, Gabriel Villa of Chicano Batman and some longtime local broadcasters if possible. I have links to newspaper articles which can back the claims.  2603:8000:8501:59B3:94AC:4E9A:7C02:8B4A (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for edits
Talk:Central Dauphin wrestling

message: School activities are not generally notable enough for their own articles. I strongly suggest a merge to the high school article. Erechtheus 06:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to the absence of feedback, I have boldly completed a minimal merge. Erechtheus 03:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Wishbone formation

message: The diagram shown in the current article appears to be more consistent with the T formation than with the wishbone.  My understanding is that in a wishbone formation, the halfbacks line up deeper in the backfield behind the fullback, so that the positions of the quarterback, fullback, and halfbacks form an inverted "Y" (i.e., a wishbone shape).  However, the diagram shows both halfbacks lined up adjacent to the fullback, as in the T formation.  Am I missing something basic about either the wishbone or T formation?  Is one a special case of the other?  If not, then I think that a different diagram with altered halfback positions would be more appropriate.Crosswalkcs 04:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected.  Sorry for the confusion.  Excaliburhorn 17:28, 13 Oct 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation Diagram Question 

message: I agree with Coach Switzer "The King" when run correctly the wishbone is tough to get a hold on, I hope someone has the stones to run it again in major football. I just look at the 70's Oklahoma teams and the yards those guys put up winning a couple of national titles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.60.196.220 (talk • contribs) 07:28, 22 January 2007
:There was a reason you could do that in the 1970s and no one could stop it. Back in those days, teams didn't emphasize sideline-to-sideline speed on defense, particularly at the outside linebackers, the way they do now. This made it easy to attack the corners of a 1970s defense with a Wishbone if you had superior athletes at quarterback and the two running backs. The Wishbone doesn't work anymore at the highest levels of football because the defense can get to the corners as fast as the offense can. Take this away, and the Wishbone becomes a straight-ahead power offense that can't work at all unless you can also pass. Even Switzer never understood this; in his book he says Miami was just better than his 1985-87 Oklahoma teams. They actually weren't, they were just built perfectly to beat his offense, with fast, rangy linebackers and safety men and good speed everywhere. OU was much better than the teams that did beat Miami in that era ('85 Florida and Tennessee, '86 Penn State), but those teams were better equipped to beat Miami. Jsc1973 12:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Switzer

message: Article fails to explain why the wishbone formation fell out of favor. Why did the formation become popular, and now is not used? Maybe I missed it. I did see some explanation in the talk section. But the article seems to *not* explain what seems to me an important question. AAABBB222 (talk) 02:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Still wondering. AAABBB222 (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no longer used?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Integration/Userbox

message: I know what the symbol for mathematical integration looks like; I've used it both for its intended purpose and for other things -- I'm entirely familiar with it. Still, my first reading of this UBX was This user (fingers) Wikipedia. 
Now, you can say I have a filthy mind and perhaps you're not all wrong. But I hate to say what someone might think who didn't even know what ƒ means. Big symbol in the icon-end is clever enough. John Reid 07:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use the word
Talk:Nucleic acid nomenclature

message: This page appears to share a considerable amount of content with the nucleic acid notation one. Should the unique parts of this page (directionality, in particular), be merged with the more complete one? The naming similarity alone at least warrants a disambiguation.UnknownCytoplasm (talk) 23:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not even much to merge - I'd just turn this page into a redirect, tbh. The title "nomenclature" is a misnomer as well, as the article is about notation, not how nucleic acids are named... EditorInTheRye (talk) 07:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Nucleic acid notation|Nucleic Acid Notation]]? 

message: this should be majorly updated or merged with Directionality (molecular biology)
I disagree. This page should stand alone only if the IUPAC nomenclature for ambiguous nucleotides is added.  This is the A, C, T, G, M, W, K, S, H, D, B, V, N nomenclature to indicate that more than one nucleotide type may be present at the given position.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctorclark (talk • contribs) 
:Agreed. And added. EditorInTheRye (talk) 12:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James W. Marshall

message: Peer review has been requested for the California Gold Rush article.  All comments and suggestions are being accepted with an eye towards possible nomination of that article as a Featured Article. NorCalHistory 07:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  peer review requested - California Gold Rush 

message: Just about all of the online references for Marshall I have found list Lambertville as his birth place.  I was surprised, then, to find that he was actually born in Hopewell Township and moved to Lambertville at age six.  That info comes directly from the Lambertville Historical Society, who run the Marshall House.  I will update appropriately.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 17:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth place 

message: Wasn't Marshall a Mormon? Shouldn't this be mentioned somewhere? - Guest  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.207.242.4 (talk) 12:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mormon Church 

message: These two excerpts should be rewritten or improved:
From the Introduction:
"The wave of gold seekers turned everyone's attention away from the mill which eventually fell into disrepair and was never used as intended." (This sentence should probably belong on the article for Sutter's Mill)
From a Photo Caption:
"The caption with this photo at the Library of Congress claims that this was Marshall in front of the mill in 1850. But it was not. The historians at Marshall Gold State Historic Park have concluded that it is not Marshall and believe it to be the photographer's assistant put in the photo to show scale." (This excerpt is awkward and possibly requires citation) -Noha307 (talk) 03:29, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrites
Talk:Caroline Crachami

message: Lucia Zarate is also listed as being the "shortast woman in recorded history", at 1'8".  This article might need some changing.
:1'8" is 20 inches, correct? Caroline Crachami was reported to be 19 1/2 inches (although she was still a child at the time of her death). Amillion 22:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pauline Musters is also said to have been the shortest woman. Crachami was not the shortest woman though because, as mentioned above, she died in childhood.--T. Anthony 15:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucia Zarate 

message: A 1998 piece in the American Journal of Medical Genetics  suggests that Caroline Crachami was actually only 3 years old (or even younger) at death, not 9 years old as was reported at the time. 
This would place her height more within the "normal" range for primordial dwarves. A comparable living example would be Kenadie Jourdin-Bromley, who is 27 inches tall at the age of 4, and who at the age of 2 or 3 could well have been of similar height to Crachami. Note the relatively small head size, which may make a 3-year-old primordial dwarf look like a proportionately shrunken version of an older child. 217.34.39.123 15:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. You should definitely add that to the article. Amillion 23:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real age at time of death? 
Talk:45 mm anti-tank gun M1937 (53-K)

message: Anti tank guns are all feresome looking bout not very effictive on heavy and medium tanks of world war two. For example the tiger 1. 100 mm of frontal armor. anti tank gun bullets just bounce off it's armor like nothing. the panzerfaust grusome looking effictiveand blows up a tiger from the inside out. they shhould invent the auto javelin. Just  guy sharin his knowlege.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.76.41.58 (talk) 03:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  anti tank guns? weird eh? 

message: Finnish Wikipedia -article about what is commonly known in Finland as "the Whip Gun" (piiskatykki) links to this article, the problem is that in Finnish wikipedia it's called anti-tank gun m/1932 (19-K), are 19-K and 53-K different designations for the same cannon/different versions based on the same Soviet weapon, and if they are the same weapon, which years of production are true, Finnish article states production took place in 1932-1942, the English states 1937-1943.
Ape89 (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  anti-tank cannon model 1932 (19-K) the same as 53-K?
Talk:Delicious Library

message: Is it just me or does this entry read like marketing copy, not an encyclopedia article. Byset 07:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we maybe get rid of the reference to some random competitor? I mean, there are dozens of competitors, it looks as though Digital Hoard is just trying to ride on our coat-tails. WilliamJonShipley 23:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Had removed the external links before, but missed the inline reference.  I do not see how this relates to an article on this software, particularly without sources.  ∴ here…♠ 07:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As an aside, betacommand had nothing to do with the original edit.  It was the same anon who later added external links to this and other articles, ( diff ). ∴ here…♠ 07:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  competitor 

message: Its out, i updated the page. Im sorry for the huge image cant figure out how to fix it. Can a mod or someone please fix image smaller or revert.
Out to catch those vandals (talk) 07:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delicious Library 2 
Talk:76 mm regimental gun M1927

message: Why was the gun type changed to howitzer ? Was it only because it has short barrel ? The gun was never classified as howitzer in USSR. Besides, gun with max elevation of 25 degrees firing single-piece ammunition (no option to select propellant load) can hardly be considered howitzer by any standard. Bukvoed (talk) 06:05, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type
Talk:152 mm howitzer M1938 (M-10)

message: I have used the B-class criteria for the WP:MILHIST project. It is just about B-class. In terms of prose it is ok. The sticking point is the number of inline citations. It needs some more although the major points are appropriately cited. Well done. Woodym555 21:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:203 mm howitzer M1931 (B-4)

message: I'm not an English major, but shouldn't the statement, "...in the battle of Berlin were the red army would bring up these guns..." be changed to, "in the battle of Berlin where the red army would bring up these guns"? 
I'm asking, not telling. If I was positive, I would change it myself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.61.169.145 (talk) 03:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where or were? 

message: I'm a bit ambiguous, because my reference for it would be a random .gif likely made in violation of copyright. But it's a place to start. I also have a similar shot (a few of them, actually) from a MoD-produced documentary posted on Youtube: . But I'm unsure on policy. - 95.165.32.11 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 17:39, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point-blank 

message: The infobox claims 871, but the text says 1.100 were built in a year's period. Anthropophoca (talk) 14:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in numbers
Talk:76 mm air defense gun M1938

message: Why is there no article on the Russian 76.2 mm M1931 AA gun? It was vastly more numerous than the M1938 and was used not only by the Soviets but also by the Germans and their allies, large numbers having been captured during the Wehmacht's drive into Russia.--Death Bredon (talk) 10:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the M1931?
Talk:85 mm air defense gun M1939 (52-K)

message: *Argee. Bukvoed 07:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[85mm M39]]

message: How does the table "allow direct comparison with foreign artillery" when no one else measures by those standards? 90deg angle and 50% chance of penetration is going to result in far more optimistic numbers than you would get using the rating system used by other organizations. For example I believe the Germans measured from a 30% strike and 70% odds of penetration. So if it says "120mm at 500m" that means at least 70% of hits will result in a penetration at 500m. If only half of the shells need to penetrate to count then obviously the armor can be thinner.  Idumea47b (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penetration
Talk:G. T. Nanavati

message: I am reverting baka's removal of my expansion of a section which he carried out with the edit summary "rm OR". Its not OR. Its directly from the rediff.com link you provided. For the 100th time overall and the second time today, Baka, at least try to read the links that you provide, if you dont want to appear a little inept. Hornplease 05:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are talking aboput the Sikh riots in that train of thought. Congrats on misrepresenting the links.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation for revert
Talk:Die Länderbahn

message: Hi, the Network section of this article needs an update:
* Vogtlandbahn serves several lines Dresden, Görlitz, Zittau and Liberec since December 2014 (routes TLX 1, TLX 2, TL 60 and TL 61), the former route line TLX has become TL 70. Please check at . "Trilex" is a brand of Vogtlandbahn GmbH.
* In mid-June 2015 several routes between Plauen, Hof, Zwickau, Falkenstein etc. will change, please check here: 
Maybe someone has time to update this article as well as List of railway routes in Saxony.</br>Thanks in advance, regards Kleeblatt187 (talk) 22:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Update done by User:Grahamec done today, thanks for this. --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update necessary 

message: I have some concerns at the renaming- all the links give the name as Regentalbahn AG – Die Länderbahn which as far as I can see is correct. Company name - description. Using UK wiki conventions - the article die would be ommitted from the title if we were talking about a company. If indeed Drei Länderbahn would be correct but Die Länderbahn would be shortened to Länderbahn. We failed to keep the Erzgebirge in its original, and it is now stupidly titled the Ore mountains. German conventions I know are different. But now the question why do we have an article on the subsidary of one company which is owned (through a holding company) by a further company- which then deals specifically with one subsidary, of that subsidary. We do have an already have an article on Regentalbahn but not Regentalbahn AG  or Regentalbahn AG – Die Länderbahn so why has Vogtlandbahn been renamed and redirected? Surely that should have been redirected in the opposite direction? --ClemRutter (talk) 16:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: "Vogtlandbahn GmbH", the company, has officially been renamed to "Die Länderbahn GmbH DLB", please see here at the official german trade register, the change being registered on 28 November 2015. The article die is now part of the official company name, before it was not. Regentalbahn AG obviously is the owner of this company, whatever name it is bearing. Vogtlandbahn is now only used as a marketing brand for rail services in the Vogtland area (actually where Vogtlandbahn GmbH originated, before expanding), but operated by Die Länderbahn GmbH, in other areas Trilex, alex, Oberpfalzbahn etc. are used also as marketing brands only. The latter brands had initially been used by "Vogtlandbahn GmbH", now they are used by Die Länderbahn GmbH". --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming from [[Vogtlandbahn]] to [[Die Länderbahn]]
Talk:Sivrihisar

message: ==Turkish==
There is a large piece of turkish text below the main article, maybe the document should be cleaned up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.194.218.158 (talk • contribs) .
:I've removed it. Don't be afriad to be bold and remove something yourself if it is ovbviously a mistake like that. VegaDark 07:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: There is a large piece of turkish text below the main article, maybe the document should be cleaned up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.194.218.158 (talk • contribs) .
:I've removed it. Don't be afriad to be bold and remove something yourself if it is ovbviously a mistake like that. VegaDark 07:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Turkish
Talk:A Midsummer Night's Dream (1935 film)

message: The movie failed at the box office because the public at large are not idiots. I've just watched this 1935 version and it was hair tearing dreadfull. I had to take a paracetamol tablet afterwards because of the head ache from concentrating so hard trying to follow the so called "fun" plot. I've seen pigs trying to fly more convincingly...  CharlieCares (talk) 08:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critics
Talk:Great Bristol Half Marathon

message: Should we add something on the Bristol Marathon, which first ran in 1982 (I dimly recollect) out to Severn Beach in the full heat of a July(?) day. Linuxlad 13:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be really useful, but I've been having quite a bit of difficulty finding sources to expand the article further. All of the articles and stats I've been able to find only seem to mention recent years, even the race history section of the official website doesn't give much detail. Gasheadsteve 12:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bristol Marathon
Talk:Human rights in the Middle East

message: Human rights in the Middle East are often reported to be a cause of concern among many outsider observers, governmental and non-governmental. All the referenced articles about individual countries cite reports by Freedom House, Reporters Without Borders, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. Some other organizations focus on specific countries (such as Defenders of Human Rights Center). Thus, the statement is well-supported. --Gabi S. 07:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-governmental reports about human rights 

message: Since when were Cyprus and Afghanistan part of the Middle East? 24.184.166.238 (talk) 01:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyprus and Afghanistan?
Talk:Lee Pelton

message: Wondering if Dr. Lee Pelton meets this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_%28academics%29?? MidgleyDJ 08:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the notability tag after adding a bit to the article that I think establishes Pelton's notability. Twisted86 22:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability