lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Johnny (Guilty Gear)

message: Uh, I really think that with 69.117.217.189's edits, the gameplay section is really going into way too much detail here. First of all, Wikipedia isn't supposed to have OMG MOVELISTS! here, and anyway, the gameplay section's really just supposed to be a short summary of what it's like, not an information overload.  (I've put this on Zappa's talk page too.) --Yar Kramer 20:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. And unfortunately, I think it's partly my fault a lot of these articles ended up like that. -- Digital Watches! 17:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay 

message: Where did we get the "Robin-hood-esque modus operandi" part? I don't remember that being mentioned in any of the games, and it sounds like it's original research and/or just plain made up. -- Digital Watches! 17:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh? What is this robin hood nonsense? 

message: If one listens to the Guilty Gear Official Drama CDs, Johnny is described as a "vigilant" and "Chivalrous". As well as a servant to the people who have suffered Post-War. He was noted in the first volume as saving the villagers of the "Blackard incident". From here he proceeds to be self-sacrificing throughout the dramas CDs for the welfare and wellbeing of the Post War people. It can also be noted that his move 'Glitter is Gold' shows that he is willing to toss out valuable coins without a care. He is hardly as vain as one can be lead to think from his youthful entourage (who are all orphans he raised and housed himself.). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seraphim Sephiroth (talk • contribs) 
:That's fine, but what the "Robin-hood-esque" modus operandi is referring to is specifically the "Robbing the rich and giving to the poor" thing. If you can find an official source that explicitly states that this is happening, I've got no issue with keeping it in the article. -- Digital Watches! 17:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robin-hood-esque modus operandi = True 

message: Johnny's move "That's my Name" strikes the enemy with a flaming J.  This is a nod to Zorro.
Also, in the recent version of the game, Johnny and May's stage features characters dancing and moving to a beat in the same fashion as those characters found in the Anime "The Melencholy of Haruhi Suzumiya". Mimeblade 17:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and Homages.
Talk:Batter (cooking)

message: I never guessed beer is used to prepare batter for fish. Vinegar is still used as a topping.Anwar (talk) 15:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Beer batter for fish by all means but what kind of a heathen batters chips? Mr Larrington (talk) 20:18, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Beer

message: The article says "Batters may be sweet or savoury," but savoury links to Umami. Is this helpful to the average reader? --DThomsen8 (talk) 11:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umami
Talk:Dadhi

message: Dadhi, Ropar, Punjab is a famous village near sacred town of Sikhs "kiratpur sahib" and "Anandpur sahib". This village is famous for its agricultural, cultural and scenic richness in all over PUNJAB. People here are very lovable, generous and hard working. Its developing speedily. Shri Harsukh Lal Sharma has been a major personality in the foundation of this village laid back in late 1960's. Now he is most honoured personality there--Genius1087 20:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:California State Route 186

message: In the Major Intersections section, somebody please change Mexican border to Mexico – United States border. I'm carrying this practice to all highway articles under WP:USRD that touch the Mexican border because that article has a new working title. Mgillfr (talk) 02:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Protection has now expired. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit protected
Category talk:Newspapers published in Macau

message: User:SchmuckyTheCat has, using his and Huaiwei's terminology, "reignited an old trouble" by modifying how the categories are structured . He cited the CfD discussion as his rationale, but the real side of the fact is that, the CfD discussion did not address how things should be restructured. I.e., that category shall remain mainland China-specific as it has been, despite the name change. Even worse, he has created :category:newspapers of Shanghai , effectively trying to put forward his point of view that special administrative regions can be dealt with in the same manner as municipalities. (Please reply at category talk:Hong Kong newspapers. Thanks.) — Instantnood 20:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit by user:SchmuckyTheCat

message: As with :Category:Hong Kong newspapers Instantnood has decided again to re-ignite this tired old edit war out of the blue.  It was last put to a halt by Enochlau, and I have reverted to Enochlau's version. SchmuckyTheCat 17:33, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to my response at  category talk:Hong Kong newspapers.  — Instantnood 21:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for starting the article. I don't know much about this newspaper, nor can I proof its notability. Its website can't even be reached. — Instantnood 21:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert, 4 Apr 2006
Talk:List of think tanks

message: I would like to put it on the record, that User:Instantnood has reverted  this article, with no valid explaination and no entry in this discussion page. This was done despite clear instructions against such disruptive behavior as per the relevant Arbcom cases.--Huaiwei 20:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Instantnood

message: The article in its current form appears to be a magnet for spam.  Given that it simply categorizes think tanks and consultancies by country, I propose either (1) deleting this and identifying organizations via the appropriate category; or (2) deleting all red links and requiring new additions to have WP articles before they are added to this list.  Does anyone object if I implement one or the other solution? - Aagtbdfoua 02:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam Magnet

message: Given there were no objections to either of the above proposals, I took an intermediate solution.  I moved this page here from List of economics consultancies and think tanks and removed all economics consultancies.  If someone really feels we should have a list of them, recreate it at List of economics consultancies.  I marked all of the economics consultancy articles with Category:Economics_consulting_firms - Aagtbdfoua 19:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: This article has been edited anonymously by Berman and Company, who are lobbyists for amongst others the American Beverage Institute, the Center for Consumer Freedom, the Center for Union Facts and the Employment Policies Institute.
IP address of 66.208.14.242 traces to Berman and Company, see the Whois report. I Spy With My Big Eye (talk) 11:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning: Lobbyists [[Berman and Company]] at work  

message: The list of Think Tanks for Mexico, is wrong.
CIDE, Colmex and ITAM, they are universities, i think they may do research, but i don0t think they are a Think Tanks, even ITAM is a profit organization.
CIDAC and IMCO are OK.
Galilei Consulting it's a consultant firm (again, profit firm)
Another Think Tanks in Mexico are: Fundacion Idea, Fundacion Ethos, Este pais, Mexicanos Primero, Fundar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tilitili17 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, it is perfectly normal for profit-making organisations to be on Wikipedia, provided they meet other criteria (WP:Notability etc.) & their inclusion is not purely for wp:Advert. Trafford09 (talk) 10:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexico 

message: Analytica: it is about software for influence diagramming, not think tank in Macedonia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Palapa (talk • contribs) 20:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analytica 

message: LEAP2020 needs to be added to the list under a EU or European heading.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap2020  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gizziiusa (talk • contribs) 19:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  LEAP2020 needs to be added to list 

message: Deduced spam deleted. Jackiespeel (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Amending
Talk:Ragged Glory

message: I'm new to editing on Wikipedia, so this is just my two cents, but I think this article reads more like an opinion currently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RaggedGlory (talk • contribs) 04:04 (UTC) 19 April 2008
:Yes, you're right.  I have removed what was someone's personal review of the album. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article reads more like an opinion

message: Yep, that's what it is called. Fantailfan (talk) 11:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "F*!#in' Up" 

message: If this album is the twentieth studio album which one is the nineteenth? Could it be that from this album on the numeration is wrong? --Manuel Funk (talk) 11:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twentieth studio album? 
Talk:Hub dynamo

message: Hub dynamos can be used to power more than just lights. For example, some automatic shifting systems for bicycles are powered by a hub dynamo  . In addition, they can be used to re-charge mobile phones, iPods, GPS devices, etc  (see BioLogic ReCharge).
Citeoplasm 03:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-light usage 

message: Does anyone know the electrical characteristics for the hub dynamo? Can you model it with a thevenin or norton equivalent one port, where the current/voltage source and the resistor are functions of the rotation speed? I assume there are different limits where the different brands and models of hub dynamos will break, for different speed and load, but are there any general "don't":s? Is the output sinus-shaped (or close to), or is there a lots of big harmonics? --Petter, 130.236.56.173 (talk) 17:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note for the one with the same question, until the question has been better answered: From the first graph on page, it seems the Norton equivalent one port works, where I ~= 0.37 A and R ~= 6.5*<speed> Ohm*s/m is a fairly good approximation. From an efficiency point of view, I rather believe in the Thévenin model, because the wheel rotates easier without any load. --Petter, 130.236.56.173 (talk) 22:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrical Characteristics 

message: In Dutch is Hub Dynamo is Naafdynamo. This one is redirected to a chapter of Fietsdynamo (Bike Dynamo) (it was consolidated). How can these words (Hub Dynamo and Naafdynamo) be related in WikiPedia? Fietsdynamo is already linked, and let it jump to the heading Naafdynamo on the Fietsdynamo page seems not possible. What to do? WritersBlok (talk) 21:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to link to Dutch page? 

message: While I appreciate the efficiency figures I don't think it should be implied that they are a function of speed.  They are almost certainly a function of RPM and probably load and perhaps other factors, but not speed of the bicycle. 75.119.225.176 (talk) 02:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Efficiency figures 

message: The sentence referring to Shimano dynamo hubs desperately needs an update, the models mentioned have been discontinued since at least the early 2010s... I could help by providing some of my own experience, but it would mostly be without references. Is that OK? I think it's against wikipedia policies. 2A02:3100:5BA9:B00:14BD:AB1F:BB1D:4806 (talk) 15:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shimano Models
Talk:Joseph Martin Kraus

message: Happy 250th birthday, good old JMK. 
Silvano 21:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Argentine peso (1983–1985)

message: This title is rather redundant.  Should it be moved to just Peso argentino? Nik42 22:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, but I guess it's named so because of Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style. Peso argentino does redirects here. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 05:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it's no worse than Latvian lat or Afghanistani afghani :-) Nik42 08:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me add another one - Zairean zaire =P --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 08:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bolivian boliviano 167.107.191.217 (talk) 21:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Hector Waller

message: What does 'RANC' stand for ?  I assume it is 'Royal Australian Navy' something, but what ?   
 
RASAM 21:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RANC

message: Hello, I was surprised to find this page only in english and german, seeing how the dutch were also involved.
I would like to translate this page into dutch. Would anyone have tips or ideas on how to proceed?
thanks
bedankt
Kearyct (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel welcome to start the equivalent page on the Dutch Wikipedia; it would be good to see that happening. Did you have any specific questions? Janggeom (talk) 11:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translating this page into Dutch (Nederlands) 
Talk:Indian cricket team in Pakistan in 2005–06

message: Need to note that ODI and test squads were different, ed Srresanth, Raina, Kaif, Blnguyen 03:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ODI squads
Talk:Graig Nettles

message: Platoon?  PTBNL?  Can we clean up the lingo please?  Not everybody is a baseball nut.  Thanks --168.215.131.150 (talk) 21:37, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lingo? 

message: On the corked bat page on Wikipedia, it links to this one, but it says nothing about him using a Corked Bat here, can someone fix that?? Minecraftpsyco (talk) 21:07, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does mention it, just not the word "corked" because the bat didn't use cork. It's there in 1974 when he used "superballs". – Muboshgu (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corked Bat 
Talk:Roosevelt Campobello International Park

message: In the infobox I have the U.S. map -- this is only because a comparable map for Canadian protected areas is not yet available.  However -- given that this is an international park honoring a U.S. president, and within a stone's throw of Maine -- I hope that its use here is understandable. — Eoghanacht talk 21:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why a map of the U.S.?
Talk:List of films based on poems

message: Xanadu takes only its title from the poem; the film itself is not "based" on it. Her Pegship 21:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Painted Veil (2006 film) also takes it title (originally) from a line in a poem. Maybe that should be a separate list: Films whose title comes from a poem. --Mathew5000 08:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptic watchlists

message: Someone just added a statement to pseudoscience saying that pseudoskepticism is a form of pseudoscience.  Pseudoskepticism is actually a term coined by Truzzi for skepticism different from his own, so it is not a pseudoscience.  This needs to be clarified.  Bubba73 (talk), 15:33, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  pseudoskepticism 

message: I once put NPOV on Philip J. Klass, but someone removed it.  I asked for other opinions, and today someone finally agreed, so I put NPOV back on it.  Bubba73 (talk), 22:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philip J. Klass 

message: I think a set of topics/categories is needed to cover demonology, exorcism, claims of ritualistic abuse/sacrifice, etc. Before I go posting these, can others please add to this list and suggest a category? --Otheus 21:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demonology topic needed
Category talk:Rapists

message: I have added a note to the category page concerning the listing of non-public figures. Non-public figures should not be listed here unless their offense is relevant to their notability. Please see Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons for more information. Thanks! Kaldari 21:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important caveat regarding non-public figures 

message: As per the discussion on deletion of the sexual offender category, it seems this category has similar problems.  It is inherently dangerous to say that a living person is a "rapist".  Even if they were convicted of the crime, it's entirely possible they were wrongfully convicted.  The article itself can present this information in an NPOV way, but this category is an absolute label, an unconditional assertion.  I suggest renaming this category, and all subcategories, to something like "people convicted of rape"... "Italians convicted of rape", etc. Gigs (talk) 13:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  It should be people convicted of rape.  And rape defined as any sexual act without consent.  Dream Focus 03:28, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dangerous category 

message: Should some note be made as to the legitimacy of placing this category on a BLP, using the legal principle of c.y.o.a.? WookMuff (talk) 00:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP 

message: That category is entirly missing. --41.151.33.134 (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  homosexual rapists
Talk:Mahmoud Tawalbe

message: The article is basically a c&p of one source (Time article). This needs to be changed, the style is also not good. I would do the edits to wikify the article myself but I'm busy with other edits and don't know enough about the subject matter itself.-Jersey Devil 21:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Misdirection (magic)

message: Since when is Misdirection a magic-related stub? How about, a cleverness or sneakiness-related stub?
Misdirection is a basic technique in magic.
Yes, but the article is titled "Misdirection", rather than "Misdirection (Magic)".--James Chenery (talk) 07:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguator

message: Title says all, anyone heard of its use in significant history? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Exander (talk • contribs) 08:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misdirection in History? 

message: I've tagged this page for original research and lack of sources. This page currently reads like a student essay on the question "describe, with examples, the use of the term misdirection." In its current state, I'd say that this is probably one of the least encyclopaedic articles on wikipedia and needs a complete rewrite to bring it up to standard. Tx17777 (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged for OR

message: Given the broad applicability of misdirection, maybe we should dispense with specific sections for film, etcetera?  Misdirection is notably used in sports, strategy/tactical board games, political announcements, crime...
Alternatively, we could make this an article specifically about the use of misdirection in television
and film, or magic, or merge both those sections with other articles on film and magic techniques, and delete this?
--James Chenery (talk) 14:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the stuff that has nothing to do with magic. That belongs in the misdirection article, not here.--Shantavira|feed me 10:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a comprehensive list 

message: I hope I don't ruffle feathers here but I've tried to add some documentation to this page. The quotes that I've chosen were all taken from highly regarded books. I'm not a writer (that should be obvious) but I do know magic and its history. Soon, I'll add more to flush it all out and make it more coherent, instead of just a collection of quotes. 69.4.52.31 (talk) 07:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: And what time would that be?  There is no mention of even a year. --jae (talk) 18:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Around the same time," 

message: How 105.161.111.221 (talk) 19:54, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to be a magician
Talk:Roger Elwood

message: Making Light is a notable, oft-cited website edited by widely respected prominent science fiction industry professionals. It is germane to this topic. The citation removed does not attack -- or even mention -- any Wikipedians. Doctorow 23:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replied on your user talk page.  ·:·Will Beback  ·:· 23:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Making Light is not an attack site

message: Mike Ashley's Gateways to Forever has a very detailed analysis of Elwood's impact on the field.  If nobody else gets around to it, I might use it to update this article, but it could be years, since I would like to work through all the magazines first.  I mention it here in case anyone else would like to take it on. Mike Christie (talk) 00:21, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The primary source for this article seems to be Buttons (Comment) #32 (2003-09-04). Teresa Nielsen Hayden. Making Light. Retrieved minutes ago. --P64 (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for this article

message: Someone came up with that line, based on The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch, always thought it was cute (sorry I don't remember who said it)... AnonMoos (talk) 12:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "The three stigmata of Roger Elwood"
Talk:Thirty Tyrants (Roman)

message: Feminism is all fine and well, but it too can be POV; just because it is in the Zeitgeist of our own times does not make it any less so. I reverted the intrusive excursus on women, while keeping the gist of it, that the HA is indeed misogynistic; but if, except for a tossed-off comment, the writer of the HA could include women among his subjects without separation or preaching, why should we do any less? Bill 22:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot see what misogynism has to do with an accepted tendency in the historiography of a certain period that the lives of women are not an appropriate topic for a historian to expound. It does not imply hatred of women (misogyny< (greek)misos: "hatred"+ gune: "woman"), it simply implies that the position of women is not in the pages of a history book according to the perceptions of the historian. It is still POV to claim that HA is "misogynistic"; it is forcing a modern category onto a text whose author would probably have no idea what he was accused of. Therefore I removed the bit about HA being misogynistic, not only because it is spurious, but also because it does nothing but provide the POV of the author based on modern sensibilities which do not promote knowledge about or understanding of the HA at all.Lucius Domitius 02:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, the text is explicitly "misogynistic" (even if the comment is just in passing, it's a striking one). Yes, there are 32 people mentioned, yet the title is 30 and it so happens that 2 of the 32 are women. On the other hand, I'm rather with Lucius, forcing modern thought and categories onto old texts is the classic "ahistorical error". On the third hand, it's just enough of interest to us moderns that in throwing out the longish excursus on women, I did leave the nub of it, the word "misogyny", which is informative if not good historiography. But to lay the 30-32 business on misogyny is not right, for three reasons: (1) the "Thirty Tyrants" title is quite clearly merely to make them parallel with the 30 Greek tyrants; (2) the Historia Augusta is such a hash in so many ways that I couldn't attribute one more mess (the miscount) to any particular cause; but mostly because the author, 31.7, explicitly states (talk of making a hash of things!), after covering 30 people, including both the women, that he's going to add two supernumeraries, and then he does, Titus and Censorinus, both men. It cannot therefore be argued that misogyny is responsible for the bad count: Titus and Censorsinus are. Bill 10:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit 3 Feb 06