Talk:Motorized bicycle/Archive 7

message: The factual acuracy of this article is disputed... though some pictures and videos have been removed and are await the end of an edit war as well as a discussion further up in this talk page as well as a mediation, this document still has factual accuracy issues that need to be resolved. ie.: Regards to: the photo of Triumph bicycle, video of power-assisted bicyle, expansion of the article, regional discrepencies. etc... and logistic of the article planing. --CyclePat 03:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Precisely which facts are you stating are inaccurate?  Details with citations please.  As it stands the issue seems more that it does not conform to your vision of how it should be (see WP:OWN).  I have removed the tag in the absence of any evidence of actual factual inacuracy. And those redlinks are still red. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 10:18, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I have removed the disputed tag again.  Please do not re-insert it without giving details on this page of the facts which are supposedly inaccurate. Note that there seems to be a lack of support for Pat's idea that this page requires mediation or any other intervention. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 14:00, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. The disputed tag is for *factual disputes*. It is not for if you are disputing something that was removed. There is no tag for that. It's just for factual disputes. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 15:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual accuracy issues. 

message: Will ANYONE other than CyclePat who thinks there is ANY evidence of EITHER factual accuracy OR non-neutral POV in this article as it stands please step forward and give details.  Please note: that is anyone OTHER THAN PAT.  Just to be absolutely clear and unambiguous here, this question is NOT FOR PAT, it's for anybody else who thinks that there is evidence of factual inaccuracy or bias in this article. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 22:28, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aside: I couldn't resist to say,... "Ooooooooh! Will the real slim shady please stand up, please stand up!" --CyclePat 22:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see it. Disputed tag can only be used for factual problems with an article, not with things like removing video. The tag even says that. It says "The factual accuracy of this article is disputed". It cannot be used in any other case. NPOV tag is only used if there is a dispute over the neutrality of an article. Again, I don't see that here. Adding and removing video doesn't add or take away from NPOV. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 04:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV and Disputed 

message: --72.57.8.215 14:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I agree with Guy above. You're trying to make something out of nothing. · Katefan0(scribble)/poll 14:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please take a look at WP:CITE. All information that is not properly sourced may be removed. I higly recomend you start encouraging someone to start adding the sources for the above issues. --CyclePat 14:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is some information that is self-evident.  "The sky is blue" doesn't need a citation. · Katefan0(scribble)/poll 16:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

text: And I highly recommend that you start listening when others tell you that you are making mountains out of molehills. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 15:01, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Once again Pat has made it appear as if a perfectly decent and accurate article is some kind of POV nightmare, when it is Pat's POV, not the article's, which is out of line. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  22:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet more needless disputation 

message: I have moved the text In a parallel hybrid motorized bicycle' man and machine are mechanically coupled [...] from the intro to the Electric section.  It is not part of Pat's dispute. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  13:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved text 

message: Archived again. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  13:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived