lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James L. Haley

message: This document has a one page bio of Haley with a photograph.  It may be useful as a citation or as a starting point towards finding other information/citations:  (pdf file, 5.5 MB) --Hebisddave (talk) 22:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Reference - HEB ISD Hall of Fame induction Program
Talk:List of prime ministers of Luxembourg

message: The main source for the page is a previous version of this document, which was cited here in 2006, but was taken offline (so far as I can tell) and replaced with a 2011 version. All the page numbers that I looked at in the citations here seem to match up correctly with the 2011 version, but I didn't look at them all, so if someone else could do a second spot check it would probably be a good idea to make sure that the page numbers aren't all messed up now. Thanks - Astrophobe (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New URL for main source
Talk:Holt McDougal

message: Two questions:  is the Rinehart in Holt, Rinehart, and Winston the same otherwise associated with Farrar and Rinehart?  Is the Holt the same as in Henry Holt and Company?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.166.64.4 (talk) 02:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and yes. See the next section. --P64 (talk) 23:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  book publishing
Talk:Henry Karnes

message: Henry Wax Karnes is no relation to the Swayze brothers.  I am related to Henry and I am a genealogist.  I have done the genealogy.  There is no link.  About 20-30 years ago, a genealogist added it to their family and it has forever been in the records.  However, Patrick and Donald's mother did not come from the same Karnes family and I want to make sure this genealogical mistake does not continue to propagate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spiel (talk • contribs) 19:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Samuel Hamilton Walker

message: The following section contains content that does not belong on the main article page.  Therefore, it has been relocated here from the article page. Please note that I AM NOT THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR of the following content - I only relocated said content. Aleding (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes from main page

message: The attribution of this massacre to Samuel Walker is false. While there is a "You Tube" clip in Spanish asserting this, even the citation to Samuel Chamberlain's work "My Confession" is fabicated. Chapter XI "Massacre of the Cave", (Page 86 of the Harper Brothers 1956 edition) has General John Wool sending Lieutenant Irvin McDowell out to investigate some shooting in the nearby mountains above the Rancho Encantada, located between Saltillo and Agua Nueva. They discover volunteers: "mostly from Yell's Arkansas Cavalry" engaging in the murder of the civilians. Samuel Walker and the Texas Rangers are not mentioned. This event occured in January, 1847. While Walker did particpate in the Battle of Monterrey, as second in command to John Coffee Hays, he along with the rest of the First Texas Volunteer Mounted Rifles had returned to Texas by October, 1846. As your article suggests, he met with Samuel Colt in December, 1846.   Walker was never again a Texas Ranger. He went north to recruit volunteers for the new regular army  regiment, The U.S. Mounted Rifles, of which he had been appointed the captain of Company "C". He did not return to Mexico until mid 1847, when he was assigned to guerilla hunting duties out of Forteleza de San Carlos de Perote and took part in battles at Las Vigas and La Hoya. 
small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by Warren Pease (talk • contribs) 14:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Massacre at La Cuevas de Encantada

message: The page 'List of people killed in duels' lists SHW as being killed in a duel in 1847, with
a link to the SHW page. However that page says he was killed in the course of a battle, with
no mention of his having fought any duels. I don't know which is right; are there perhaps
two distinct individuals with similar names? 74.79.146.29 (talk) 16:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did SHW die in a duel? 
Talk:Robert Fripp

message: The lead mentions that Fripp collaborated with Midge Ure. As a fan of both, that came as a surprise, yet there is no subsequent mention of Ure in the rest of the article. A trip to the old Google did reveal that Fripp contributed Soundscapes to Ure's 1986 album Breathe (and this is mentioned briefly in the album's Wiki article), should this be added to the Collaboration section since it was mentioned in the lead?2600:4040:7B78:1000:4112:F5E2:7C8D:ABE (talk) 00:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, a good improvement. The Roches certainly deserve a mention. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midge Ure?
Talk:Wonderwice Margera

message: Where'd the picture come from? Haven't seen that yet. It's him for sure, I'm just curious. =P 
EDIT: Never mind, found it XD
--Chemicalist 13:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Before I do this (probably tomorrow), maybe someone can check whether in the RAW Tousen says pure or pure-hearted. Thanks. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 04:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He uses the phrase 純粋 (じゅんすい) meaning pure, genuine, unmixed. --Pentasyllabic 23:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pure vs. pure of heart

message: What chapter does Wonderwice first appear in? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.163.166.225 (talk • contribs).
:Chapter 229 --Grimjaw 01:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chapter

message: I don't really know how WW article survived the "Hollow Hunt", but it did. Now I'm asking, WHY do we have an article about him? Ok, maybe in the future we'll have lots of things about him, but not now. So... merge with the "Hollows in Bleach" article? - 189.3.69.228 13:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it's a borderline case as far as notability goes, and I think we're just keeping the article because it's implied that Wonderwice will be very important in the future. Also we have been returning some of the hollow articles, notably Luppi, an article that was deleted but later restored. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 13:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WW sticks out way too much to not get attention later. he comes in acting mentally defective, then they say he's pure and all that crap...there is obviously something about him unusual/important. he's obviously not a wuss either as SS implied he's espada strength and he took an attack from kisuke better than yammy did...he'll be important later or kubo is foreshadowing for the hell of it lol. --Grimjaw 03:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Susanna Dickinson

message: I find this article incredibly confusing and poorly written. Is there any way to clarify the details within it?--2602:306:341E:9100:29AC:6AE:D43:5A60 (talk) 18:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the resent TV show Texas rising, I believe it actually shows her being interviewed right after the battle.  She is ask how many cannons that Santa Anna had, and she just responds "kill them all".
Lots of people reading this article I suppose are wondering if this is from the actual historical record?75.101.69.101 (talk) 02:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did she ever say "kill them all" like in Texas Rising? 

message: Hi I added a new section about Dickenson's depiction in the 1962 file The Alamo
165.196.204.146 (talk) 04:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dickenson in film 

message: One section says she saw her husband in the chapel during the fighting, but did not see him again even his body.
Later it states she helped Santa Anna identify all of the leaders' bodies including her husband.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwood1957 (talk • contribs) 06:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Did She or Didn't She???
Talk:Ted Cruz

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTuipne-eM8
https://www.msnbc.com/the-beat-with-ari/watch/hear-ted-cruz-caught-on-tape-plotting-step-two-of-jan-6-coup-171324485510
https://theweek.com/ted-cruz/1022989/ted-cruz-describes-jan-6-plot-on-new-tape-released-by-ex-tucker-carlson-producer
https://www.washingtoninformer.com/sen-ted-cruz-caught-on-tape-plotting-step-two-of-jan-6-insurrection/
http://washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/25/ted-cruz-fox-election-fraud/ Gabefair (talk) 00:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ted Cruz Coup Plot Recording 

message: He is not Hispanic American. He is Canadian 173.174.245.14 (talk) 12:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. M.Bitton (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 November 2023 

message: Greetings! Regarding this revert: there was no explanation in the edit summary. What was your reason for removing this text? -- Beland (talk) 20:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's original research. AlsoWukai (talk) 21:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add a citation. -- Beland (talk) 02:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of links to background topics
Talk:Wacker von Wackenfels

message: I've tagged this article for cleanup...it seems to be legitimate, but all of the searches I have done for the subject have returned results that are not in English, so I'm unable to help out much with this one.  Hopefully someone knows something about this and can rewrite it so as to make it understandable.  --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 13:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup|June 2006
Talk:Tony Gormley

message: Is it "Gormaley" as the page is titled or "Gormley"? I'm pretty sure it's the latter and will move the page if no-one provides evidence to the contrary.GiollaUidir 13:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that's the correct spelling --UpTheRa 17:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of Surname?
Talk:Texas International Airlines

message: This was moved from the article: What about the crash  of the Convair 600 in Arkanas
Postoak 19:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: How can an "encyclopedia" make a claim such as, "Operating out of hubs at Dallas and Houston, the airline provided regional passenger service in Texas and surrounding states for most of its life." and then go on and admit that a citation is needed to substantiate that claim...and put the claim up on the page without the citation? Without the citation -- the claim is as meaningful as print in a tabloid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.69.203.224 (talk) 02:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed? Citation Mandatory!
Talk:Texians

message: >> Texians is a name for immigrants from the United States 
That would be emigrants from the united states
Emigrants from the united states to Mexico who hoped to what? Immigrate to Mexico; claim the land for America; establish a new territory; flee america?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.88.14.203 (talk) 23:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Just passing by-- but an easy one to answer:  They did not claim the land for the U.S..  Prior to 1836, Texians were citizens of Mexico, not citizens of the United States. And it was Mexican politics, not U.S. politics which drove Texas, and other Mexican states, to rebel in the Mexican Federalist verses Centralist conflicts.  Only Texas succeeded in that rebellion.  The U.S. was not involved in Texas until 1845. --cregil (talk) 16:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  confused 

message: this article should acknowledge that the word "Texican" was often used to refer to residents of Texas before its independence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.251.68.246 (talk) 23:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texican
Talk:A. Scott Berg

message: This seems to be a solid little article. I take it there is not much information available on Berg? Just a few things:
*Princeton sources seem a bit unreliable, especially The Daily Princetonian, which is a student newspaper. These two sources do not have the same kinds of fact-checking that a "real" newspaper does. Are there no other sources that have this information?
*Expand lead - currently it is only a statement of Berg's notability. It needs to be a summary of the article per WP:LEAD (see also WP:BETTER#Lead section for help on writing leads).
*From 1999 to 2003, Berg served on Princeton University's Board of Trustees. - Oddly tacked onto "Lindbergh" section.
Let me know if you have any questions regarding this review and drop me a line when you want me to re-review it. Awadewit | talk 11:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Better! Passing now. Awadewit | talk 09:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA hold

message: F. Scott Berg is reported to have been "totally stumped" at the revelation that Charles Lindbergh had three secret families with mistresses, as well as the legitimate family he shared with his wife Anne Morrow Lindbergh. Berg stated that he had no clue why this happened, that it did not fit his view of Lindbergh, and that he must simply have decided to have a different kind of life. I think there are clues as to why it happened in Berg's biography LINDBERGH. Anne Morrow Lindbergh's affair with her therapist is discussed on pages 379, 380 and 381. The affair was at its height in 1956. There is no question that it was sexual, since Anne's daughter discovered an unambiguous love letter written by her mother's lover. It is difficult to believe that Lindbergh was unaware of it. His wife was constantly seen at parties, dinners and public events in the company of this man. She even rented a New York apartment to be closer to him. Lindbergh objected to the relationship, but Anne insisted it was just a friendship. Although Lindbergh never called her out for unfaithfulness, he was no fool. It was the next year, 1957, when he began his first affair, with his German interpreter Brigitte. Arguably, he had come to believe that what was sauce for the goose was sauce for the gander.
LINDBERGH, by A. Scott Berg. Pages 379, 380, 381
Younggoldchip (talk) 14:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Significant Timing of Charles Lindbergh's Affairs
Talk:José Ángel Navarro (elder)

message: The content of this article actually refers to Ángel Navarro, not José Ángel Navarro (the elder) who was Ángel's son .  It was moved from its original, and correctly named Ángel Navarro on December 16, 2014 with the edit summary "moved page Ángel Navarro to José Ángel Navarro (elder): name used elsewhere".  Confusion over the names has been understandable.  
*Ángel Navarro (1748–1808)
:San Antonio alcalde (mayor) under Spanish Texas
: Married María Josefa Ruiz y Peña
*José Antonio Navarro (1795–1871) , son of María Josefa (Ruiz) and Ángel Navarro- signed the Texas Declaration of Independence and was a Texas State Senator
:*José Ángel Navarro (the younger) (1828–1876) son of José Antonio Navarro, nephew to José Ángel Navarro (the elder)
* José Ángel Navarro (the elder) (1784–1836) - son of María Josefa (Ruiz) and Ángel Navarro, soldier, two-term alcalde (mayor) of San Antonio under Mexican Texas. Died June 13, 1836 at his home.
My intent here is to straighten this out and get the correct content with the correct article titles. — Maile  (talk) 15:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction made. This article now is correctly about José Ángel Navarro (the elder), while the content about Ángel Navarro has been moved back to its own article.  Redirects taken care of. — Maile  (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intent to correct confusion over the Navarro family
Talk:Marc

message: There is a page for Marc (disamb.) and MARC (disamb.). MARC links to Marc, but not vice-versa. There are several pages listed on MARC that are not on Marc. Marc is also the first result to display if searching "marc". I think they would be better if the pages were combined, with a redirect for whichever is closed (I vote MARC). Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with editing Disambiguation pages. --Westleyd (talk) 11:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidating Marc/MARC 

message: The word "marc" referring to a French alcohol drink occurs several times in books by Peter Mayle (A Year in Provence, Toujours Provence). He apparently enjoys the stuff. I get the impression that it's some sort of brandy made from the leavings of making wine.  https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/marc <FONT COLOR="red"><B>☺</B></FONT> Dick Kimball (talk) 13:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcohol
Talk:Janowska

message: I changed the title to Janowska, as there is a separate article on the Lwów Ghetto. This article anyway focuses on the Janowska camp, with the Lwów Ghetto being just the background. Magister 13:40, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Supported -- Deborahjay 14:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title: Janowska

message: The use of the external link to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum website requires a Search on the name ""Janowska"". I've tried several versions, and this seems to me the most comprehensive method. As the link here doesn't go directly to the topic -- which on searching displays internal links to numerous items -- I've added the explanation to the wording of the ext. link. -- Deborahjay 04:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to USHMM site - reword 

message: No. It was an invasion of Eastern Poland/Western Ukraine occupied by the Soviet Union. Xx236 06:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  invasion of the Soviet Union's territories
Talk:Tom Palmer (comics)

message: Given his signature collaborations with Colan and Adams, wouldn't an image of one of those pairings be more suitable and representative than the Blevins-Palmer pairing currently in the article? Certainly, a Tomb of Dracula Colan-Palmer page would be a highly representative example of Palmer's work. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Art example
Talk:Lumines Live!

message: I think I remember reading that multiplayer won't be initially included, but will be a premium add-on.
:Just added details of packaging Multiplayer and Singleplayer separately and put it in a new 'Features' section.--Gamer2325 11:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: s

message: Single player and multiplayer came together in one game (with Time attack and skin edit), the first pack (Advance) was available today, Thursday the 19th (the game was officially available yesterday, wednesday the 18th).)  Advance offered new stages/songs but nothing to make the game actually harder, just longer.
Most of the public reaction to the game is outrage at the pricing model, this would definitely be worth noting, many aren't even playing the game because of it.
::Agreed that some mention of the pricing controversy should be included.  Worth noting is that many official and semi-official sources  (Major Nelson etc) listed the price as 'FULL GAME' (even this wikipedia article uses the term 'core game' but this term was not used by Microsoft).  Only AFTER purchasing did it become apparant that the 'full game' was still missing alot of content. I think Microsoft will be very careful in their wording in future. --born against 13:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Features and needed updates. 

message: If so, I think it should be merged. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 04:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For all effective purposes, yes.  A merge is right. --MASEM 05:13, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  , these comments are super old, so sorry for the attention. i made a draft and brought it into the main article space. I didn't notice this discussion until i redirected the draft talk page here. I can verify that it isn't a port. It had different songs from the original and new enhancements. And this particular one was divisive out of the entire series because of the base game price and DLC controversy. It also has its own soundtrack, Lumines Remixes Winter.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a port of Lumines?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Fetofs

message: Statistics pulled from the toolserver pertaining to the English-language Wikipedia were potentially corrupt based on severe data corruption in our data set. We have since reimported the entire database and recommenced replication of the English Wikipedia database. Hence, data might be out of date, but it should not be incorrect. robchurch | talk 14:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've since been further advised that there has been subsequent corruption of the data set. robchurch | talk 19:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toolserver
Talk:Colleen Wing

message: Colleen was not Jean Grey's roommate. That was Misty Knight. See, for example, Iron Fist #15 and Uncanny X-Men #105 as sources. I've edited both pages accordingly. --JamesAM 14:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some reference should be made of how Coleen (and for that matter Misty) have been basically recreated since the DotD series, becoming "tough girls" with oversexualized looks.  For that matter, some reference of that series as the true precursor of the current HfH book is also needed. Luis Dantas 06:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New focus since "Daughters of the Dragon" series
Talk:Del Monte note

message: Has it been discovered how the sticker found itself inside the printing press? NorthernThunder 16:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Del Monte note is going for auction sale and most speculations announce significant increase of value, according to this news article. --Domjanovich (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Increasing value 2021
Talk:Arunagirinathar

message: No references cites. Question if the material is from a copyrighted source.  KarenAnn 14:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think, you have mistaken THIRUPPUKAZH with THIRUKKURAL. Because, it says only 1330 thirupukazh is available now.ponnambalamwell known as santhosh janardhanan | talk me 06:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: is the count correct?