lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Star Model BM

message: iam ahmed from jordan forensic lab my questions about the distance of stat model bm and effective range and effects on movement of bullet and at what distance will change its stariaght movement
thank you 
my email is ajlouney@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.90.172.252 (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  star bm model 

message: The BM is just a variant of the Model B and I intend to create a Star Model B page as there is not one yet on wikipedia. AdAstra2009 (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this page be moved/renamed Star Model B?
Talk:Bersa 83

message: I am trying to find a pair wood grip’s with a silver plated Bersa inlay on both left and right grip’s, any help in locating these grip’s would be greatly appreciated. 2601:8C3:8585:D4F0:A094:ADAF:B224:DC7 (talk) 04:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woof grip’s 

message: My Bersa 83 is missing the silver “Bersa” inlay on the left grip any assistance in locating replacement grip’s or a silver inlay for the left grip would be greatly appreciated. 
Send reply to
quotetheraven@outlook.com 2601:8C3:8585:D4F0:A094:ADAF:B224:DC7 (talk) 04:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wood grip’s for my Bersa 83 .380 ACP
Talk:Heckler & Koch P9

message: I agree with the merger. The P9 article will be more useful with the 9S info right there in the same article.Jarhed (talk) 00:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with P9S 

message: I have deleted a couple of citations to HKPRO.com. It is not a reliable source for Wikipedia articles because its articles are anonymously posted and there's no discernible editorial review process. See WP:V for general rules, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms#HKPRO/ hkpro.com for a specific discussion of this source.  Rezin (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  HKPRO 
Talk:Grand Power K100

message: This article does not seem to maintain neutrality.
Examples of a non-neutral POV:
"The trigger pull in single action is very short, resulting in quick follow up shots."
"The K100 also features ambidextrous controls, making it an ideal choice for left-handed shooters."
"The field stripping breakdown procedure is unlike any other made, as the slide moves to the rear, and up off the frame. It's very quick and easy. Reassembly takes a bit of practice, but is equally quick and easy when performed a few times."
Jersey emt (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I have reviewed the pictures and diagrams of the gun and do not understand how this gun's recoil spring guide's interface with the barrel is different than any other. In short, no short action recoil pistol has the spring's guide interfacing with the barrel. All automatic pistols I am familiar with have the spring anchored in the frame or transfer block at the rear and the slide at the front. How could the guide pin possibly interface with the barrel??? The statement as written is complete nonsense.
--24.10.27.118 (talk) 09:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to slide recoil spring mounting removed 
Talk:Remington Model 51

message: Good change on the action to "hesitation locked." Blowback was wrong, and the action is definitely closer to locked breech (which is why a .45 ACP version could be made), but I did not see the category for hesitation lock on the blowback page. Unfortunately, the "hesitation locked" link on the blowback page doesn't lead anywhere except back to the top of the blowback page. --Ana Nim 13:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pedersen's pistols were the only firearms known to utilize this system, so there doesn't need to be a separate page, in my opinion, since this page explains it completely. --Asams10 15:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about the Benelli B76 pistol?  D.E. Watters 16:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Funny, I bought a B76 because I could not, for the life of me, figure out how it worked.  I think it was marketed as revolutionary (which it was) but in reality, it's a lever-delayed blowback more than anything else.  Compare it to a French FAMAS. Funny, I looked up the patent for the B76 and it references the Pedersen patent.  The Benelli patent is . The Pedersen patent is .  I've got a great deal of data on the Remington 51.  I plan on writing a definitive article when I retire soon.--Asams10 17:14, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locking system 

message: I removed the "Design details" section which was entirely unsourced. Preserving content here in case sourcing can be found. Some passages such as "Field stripping the pistol is cumbersome but not overly complicated and is mastered with practice" and "One can insert a dowel into the barrel and push on the breech block" are unencyclopedic commentary, even if sourced. –dlthewave ☎ 21:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced section
Talk:Beretta U22 Neos

message: Update anyone? Under the Carbine Conversion Kit section near article bottom it states:
"...currently not available in the United States" which is an ambiguous dated reference (bad practice, IMHO), and doesn't state "as of XX YYYY" or such. Does anyone know if this is still true, as of September 2008?  If not, can anyone easily research availability and find out, then update that line item factoid? Please?  TIA!
168.166.196.40 (talk) 20:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 
Talk:Ruger MK III

message: Where are ruger mk III's made?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.214.1.55 (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Recoil operation is locked breech; the Ruger MKII and MKIII are unlocked blowback actions. Naaman Brown (talk) 20:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Where are they made?
Talk:José Villalonga

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved José Villalonga (football manager) to José Villalonga, and dab page deleted (repurposed).  No such user (talk) 11:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 18:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 September 2021
Talk:WIST-94

message: Can someone clarify what is meant by "jam," which is somewhat lacking and out-dated term in the gun industry. Is it a failure to feed, a failure to fire, a failure to extract, a failure to eject? Does the magazine spring or follower tilt and get bunched up? Is it a slide problem, a magazine problem? Sturmgewehr762 (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jam" clarification
Talk:Heckler & Koch P2000

message: This article needs pictures to add to it. C0N6R355 18:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. C0N6R355 23:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: The Infobox appears to be broken (see the leed.) I would fix this myself but am not expert with Infoboxes. — Robert Greer (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. ROG5728 (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Part of the article is written, or possibly copied from a source, that uses conversational tone and references to discussions not covered in the article.
It actually sounds like it is lifted from a longer magazine article on history of tge USP and P2000 pistols. 86.114.239.186 (talk) 11:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-encyclopediac tone
Talk:Smith & Wesson SW99

message: The previous introduction stated the both the SW99 and P99 are manufactured Smith & Wesson and Walther, which is incorrect. S&W did in fact manufacture the slide and barrel of the P99 at one point, but this was exclusive to the .40 S&W variants. Currently, P99's are exclusively manufactured in Germany; some confusion might arise from the importation marks on P99's which bear Smith & Wesson markings on the slide, but these are only importation markings.
I have revamped the previous article, making it more accurate. Grammar has been improved. I removed references to the Glock pistol present throughout the article as these are irrelevant. I added the three variations of the pistol and explained the differences between them. I added the SW99 manual from S&W as a reference. Added distinguishing design traits between the P99 and SW99. Added available calibers. NewYorkCityPhilanthropy (talk) 03:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections
Talk:Guillermo García López

message: I would like to move this article to Guillermo Garcia Lopez. This is the common, conventional name for a subject in English. If this article title makes a statement of fact, it is currently "By English convention, the name of this person is Novak Đoković". This statement of fact is verifiably false: the overwhelming majority of citations from all English language sources use "Guillermo Garcia Lopez". For example look at yahoo sport site, Australian open site, sportsline.com, US open site, www.tennis.com... Also look on Novak Djokovic tallk page. There are argumensts for move. I think that we should have same standards for all articles. --Jovanvb (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Consistency is not a mandate. Rovingrobert (talk) 02:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

text: Novak has shown that he goes by Djokovic in English. That's how he spells it. You'd have to show that Garcia Lopez spells it that way in English also. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move 
Talk:Daewoo Precision Industries K5

message: 380 cal. 180.191.16.28 (talk) 15:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To buy the item
Talk:Yuki Kaida

message: Alright, this has been bugging me for a while. It states on her Japanese Wiki that her real name is Yukiko, as stated on radio.
Does anyone have any proof of this? Chuugoku (talk) 3:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Real name?

message: Hi, the year of birth is missing, isn't there a reliable source for it? I nominated the picture for deletion, I suspect flickr washing. I also have concerns with the sources. I can't speak Japanese but quite a few look like forum posts. All sources should follow the Reliable sources guideline. Hekerui (talk) 13:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment
Talk:The One and Only

message: I created this article on 24th February, it would seem someone decided to create another one of the same film on the 27th. Is there someone out there who could maybe merge the two together as they both appear to have information about the film that could be used. I don't know. Thanks Luckyles 07:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Solved - changed to a disambiguation page. Rgds, --Trident13 22:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: There is a move discussion in progress at Talk:One and Only (album) that may affect this page. You are invited to participate in that discussion, which should take place there (not here). —BarrelProof (talk) 23:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion notice 
Talk:Ferenc Dávid

message: I see that a book published on lulu.com is being cited in this article. Since lulu.com is an online self-publishing house, that appears to be in contradiction of the comment on WP:RS that such sources are "largely not acceptable". Charles Matthews (talk) 16:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Charles, that is correct. However this is unusually good for a Lulu book, and as far as I can remember seems to be sourced largely from the four Hungarian-into-German volumes of the Bibliotheca dissidentium, 1 of which, on David, is I recall also now available in English. At some point in time someone needs to replace the Lulu book with the original German page numbers. But for the time being, it is one of the few English language sources which reflects the last 20 years of Hungarian Unitarian scholarship, everything else is in Hungarian, and some in German, and Balasz' David biography in English. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of self-published sources

message: I have asked at q:Talk:Ferenc Dávid whether anyone has earlier attributions. As things stand currently in the article, the matter is phrased somewhat awkwardly. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:59, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Love alike" quote
Talk:Tomasz Strzembosz

message: 99% of his books and papers are ignored. It's biased.Xx236 (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strzembosz authored a dozen books and over 100 scholarly papers.  

message: The same publication which is used to quote controversial claims by Michlic does contain a rather more nuanced and positive view of Strzembosz by Kai Struve.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 15:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I obtained Shared History, Divided Memory: Jews and Others in Soviet-occupied Poland, edited by Elazar Barkan, Elizabeth A. Cole, Kai Struve, 

message: About Żydokomuna, Jedwabne, etc.? TrangaBellam (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing
Talk:Starz in Their Eyes

message: I'm dubious about whether this song warrants an article, and have added a merger tag. -Superbeecat 21:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? It's notable because it reached reached no 2 in the UK, and there's nothing wrong with having stubs. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 17:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree, it certainly is notable - no. 2 in the UK charts justifies it easily. See Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Songs.  The article is very thin - but surely the proper solution is for it to be expanded (as tagged); I suggest the merger tag is removed. Carbonix 01:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article
Talk:Jōji Yanami

message: Still in the process of reformatting this list to comply with WP:LOW. However, it is getting close to my bedtime and this list is very long. —Farix (t | c) 03:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: List completed. Now all that is needed is sourcing. —Farix (t | c) 02:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I gave this list a major overhaul so it should be well-sourced now. Some of the entries still need translating help or might technically be in the wrong section so feel free to correct those. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in progress
Talk:Arizona State Route 85

message: #Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#::  Article has on overuse of the ADOT link. Could all of them but the first use be removed?
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#::  One would be useful, but it will not affect the GAN.
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
I will pass once the above is fixed.Mitch32contribs 21:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Overlinking fixed.  --Holderca1 talk 22:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: GA passed. Mitch32contribs 22:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review
Talk:Hōzen-ji

message: This seems to be different from 法善寺（ほうぜんじ）, a Jodo temple in Osaka. Can you name the city? Fg2 07:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The "West Entrance" image in the article says that it's in 若草町, which would make it 法善寺 (南アルプス市). Hope that helps. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've linked the English and Japanese articles. Fg2 20:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location?
Talk:Yuma High School (Arizona)

message: Enough here to prob. avoid deletion or merging with nearby schools, however you have an interesting history. Can you tell us much more .... with refs and pics? Victuallers 23:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: assess
Talk:I'm Out

message: I'm Out did not chart in Germany. Source ist wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.7.182.68 (talk) 14:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Charts
Talk:Arizona State Prison Complex – Florence

message: Google Map View of entrance
WhisperToMe (talk) 05:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Seán Ó Faoláin

message: Is Sean any relation of Nuala O'Faolain? 
Pnelnik (talk) 14:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Born as John Francis Whelan, so I'd doubt it. 195.162.87.201 (talk) 13:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any relation of Nuala? 

message: The Dictionary of Irish Biography says 23 February 1900.  Virtually all other sources say 22 February. Yet we're saying 27 February. How can this be?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 10:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Teatime

message: I've seen this term used by British English speakers to mean a specific time.  The term is actually used in this manner in at least one article, namely Popworld.  The actual time referred to is not readily apparent to Americans as this term is not in use there.  Could any in the know please clarify? 208.242.14.101 07:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teatime as time of day
Talk:Ruy López de Segura

message: Is there a source for the petrov's defense line being named for Ruy Lopez? the lichess analysis board didn't see anything special. 96.37.80.50 (talk) 02:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petrov's defence 

message: Hello everyone! I just started expanding this article. If you have anything to contribute, please do! Also please put any sources here if they're not included already... I need them!Mack Robot (talk) 03:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Expansion Begun! 

message: De Segura was Roman Catholic, and it would seem appropriate to describe him as such, just as consensus indicates we do across Wikipedia. Elizium23 (talk) 16:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You realize you've violated 3RR right? and you do not have a local consensus to make this change. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 16:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , actually I did not. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I count 3 reverts in 24 hours. In any case it seems you have no interest in the subject of the article (nobody calls him "de Segura"), you simply came here to troll me following the thread at WP:NPOVN, complete with irritating edit summary. What a waste of everyone's time. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 05:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 3RR applies to more than 3 edits in 24 hours. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 08:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

text:  The most common form online seems to be "Spanish priest", which is also the description used in the OED. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 21:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps we could just call him catholic in the body than rather than the lead sentence? Regards  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 22:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman Catholic 

message: Describe López as Roman Catholic? Elizium23 (talk) 17:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  The most common form online seems to be "Spanish priest", which is also the description used in the OED. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 21:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps we could just call him catholic in the body than rather than the lead sentence? Regards  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 22:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC

message: The source is a self-published software developer, using "internet names" for chess openings. It is not reliable. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 10:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Openings named for Ruy Lopez"
Talk:Sedgley OSS .38

message: Single shot capacity; it is either a silenced pistol/carbine (locked breech allowing no escape of gas/noise) or a "one use" cheapo throwaway self defence weapon. I guess the former owing to the service it was issued to. This needs references. LessHeard vanU 22:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, what is it? 

message: Would be good if someone could find info on whether or not this was ever actually used, or even just deployed. This could have been a weapon that never got passed the development phase. FropFrop (talk) 08:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion
Talk:Marc Coma

message: Hi, I am attempting to revert edits made by IP 186.154.38.190 on the basis that Catalan individuals and conventions should be mentioned separately from Spanish conventions. Before an edit war with the IP starts on the issue, I'd like to seek a resolution on the matter.  as regular contributors to this article, I'd also like your input on these edits.
Keep or Remove: Catalan convention for this person. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 04:04, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before an edit war starts... 
Talk:Wonder Nine

message: The picture of the CZ 75B is not appropriate because it isn't appropriate for this article, because the model chosen is chambered in .40 S&W (which is specifically a 10mm round, not a 9mm round - the namesake of the "wonder nine" expression). 
The source claims claims that the CZ 75 is an appropriate example because the wiki article literally lists it as a classic example of a Wonder Nine, but that article is specifically referring to the CZ 75 and not the CZ 75 B. 
The picture should be changed to a Glock 17, a Beretta 92 or a Sig Sauer P220 series, as these are by far the most iconic examples of the Wonder Nines. 
If the editors of this page insist on using a picture of a CZ 75-series, at least use the picture of the original, and not the 75-B. Samitscherning (talk) 19:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: PA15 is not double action  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.159.32.21 (talk) 13:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAB PA-15 

message: *
**Replacement link: 
*
These sources do not appear to meet Wikipedia standards because they look like self published sources whose author has not had work published in the field by reputable third parties (WP:SPS). These citations and the material they reference may be removed, per WP:V.  If you have any information showing that the source is in fact suitable for Wikipedia, please add it here. If you can find a replacement source, please add it to the article. Rezin (talk) 16:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 586

message: What year was the 586 introduced?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  14:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gettin' a date

message: I removed a paragraph about the internal locking mechanism which was not supported by the provided source. Information about the 586 may be relevant if it can be sourced, but other commentary such as  is unencyclopedic and should not be included even if well-sourced. Preserving content here. –dlthewave ☎ 04:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced content
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 15

message: Discontinued in 2013. Archive.org's capture of S&W's webpage from 3/24/13 shows the Model 15 available.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130324035603/http://www.smith-wesson.com:80/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Category4_750001_750051_757779_-1_757751_757751_image
The capture from 4/2/13 and every capture thereafter shows the Model 15 gone.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130402104607/http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Category4_750001_750051_757779_-1_757751_757751_image  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.125.107 (talk) 04:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)