lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Barry Cooper (musicologist)

message: I'm amazed the New Grove doesn't have an article on Barry Cooper. It should at least mention him in its Beethoven article. Also look at the "About the Authors" section of the Beethoven Compendium and other Beethoven books Cooper has authored or edited. (The program notes of the out of stock Wyn Morris/LSO recording also have bio info on Cooper). Anton Mravcek 21:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This struck me as a weasel word, so I replaced it with "fragmentary". --Scottandrewhutchins 20:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''mythical'' 10th Symphony?
Talk:Great Fire of 1910

message: The Great Fire of 1910 was a large fire caused naturally and ended with the help of nature its self. It scorched 3 million acres. There were several fires split. This occured in Idaho and Montana, which during the fire was experiencing hurricane force winds.                                             Camden M01:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I took this URL out of the text.  (It was added on January 15.)
http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&biw=1024&bih=653&tbm=isch&tbnid=nqeDTkCaX0UDNM%3A&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foresthistory.org%2F1910fires.htm&docid=60L4NMrbcgOqrM&imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foresthistory.org%2FASPNET%2FPolicy%2FFire%2FFamousFires%2F1910Fires_2665.jpg&w=620&h=315&ei=8NPWUtDaDsylkQenuoH4Ag&zoom=1&ved=0CFgQhBwwAA&iact=rc&dur=1056&page=1&start=0&ndsp=13
It is a picture:
http://www.foresthistory.org/ASPNET/Policy/Fire/FamousFires/1910Fires_2665.jpg
from the source:
http://www.foresthistory.org/ASPNET/Policy/Fire/FamousFires/1910Fires.aspx
It is probably free of copyright if someone wants to upload it to Commons and use it in this article.
HowardMorland (talk) 03:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: picture URL

message: The term firestorm is used in the introduction, apparently as a synonym for wildfire. The Great Fire was not a firestorm, as far as I can tell.Royalcourtier (talk) 02:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT a firestorm 

message: The main outcome was the destruction of three million acres of forest. The suggestion that the outcome "was to highlight firefighters as public heroes", or the raising of "public awareness surrounding national nature conservation" sounds far-fetched. The latter in particular does not seem supported by the reports.Royalcourtier (talk) 02:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outcome 

message: * https://www.sfgate.com/california-wildfires/article/How-the-Big-Blowup-destroyed-the-West-s-forests-15648092.php
Just saw this. 2602:24A:DE47:BB20:50DE:F402:42A6:A17D (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  sfgate 

message: It seems like it'd be worth looking into death tolls for this page.  There are a lot of conflicting answers I've found.  A USDA document on the fire lists 86 deaths, but I've been able to find this document which lists 85 by my count.  Additionally, the article states 87.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwfmu (talk • contribs) 15:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Tolls
Talk:Mod revival

message: These cites are used to support the opening line that "The mod revival was a music genre and subculture that started in England in 1978 and later spread to other countries (to a lesser degree)." Yet none of the links go to such information. They go to archived landing pages of what appear to be fan sites. One of them appears to be a fan site of the Cavern in Liverpool. SilkTork (talk) 16:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Cites moved from lead
Talk:Manhuaçu

message: I got rid of the references to the religion since I don't think it added to the article.Vogensen 21:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cologne Mani-Codex

message: Please verify the source and copyright status of this translation (not the orginal document) before moving--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 21:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

message: (...) "a minuscule papyrus codex, dated on paleographical evidence to the fifth century" - a something wrong. The oldest minuscules came from 8th century. Perhaps it is not minuscule codex, or the codex is not so old. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 16:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of the codex 

message: The first reference link refers to the "Main Codex" twice, should be Mani Codex, right? 150.101.174.148 (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling in reference link
Talk:Homological algebra

message: The text states "if X is a topological space then the singular chains C_n(X) are formal linear combinations of continuous maps from the n-sphere into X". The more common definition is based on maps from the topological n-simplex into X, equivalently, from the closed n-ball into X. June 7-th 2008
Good catch. Corrected. Arcfrk (talk) 05:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unorthodox definition of singular homology?

message: Hi;
I'm trying desperately to understand many of these advanced principals of mathematics, such as hmological algebra, but no matter how many times I review the material, it doesn't sink in. Could someone please provide examples, problems to solve (with their solutions) and/or ways to visualize this?
beno 26 Jan 2006
:How much math have you studied? At a minimum you should know the basic properties of groups, rings, fields, and modules from abstract algebra, along with the basic fundaments of algebraic topology. I suppose chain complexes would be a concrete place to start. Learning all of this stuff typically takes years of study. - Gauge 07:26, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New To Advanced Math
Talk:Seacat (missile)

message: The manufacturers spelt the name "SEACAT" (one word) - see Shorts' 1965 advertisement for the system here;  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name  

message: for The Military Balance 2019, the Seacat was in service on a nigerian corvette, the Erinomi a Vosper mk 9, some can confirm that the Seacat is operational?
for note the Tigercat is listed under the iranian air force sectionFrancomemoria (talk) 15:38, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Came here thinking the same thing I'm pretty sure no one is using Sea Cat anymore, anyone have better knowledge? WCMemail 15:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seacat today in service?
Template talk:User vim

message: The problem with this specific image is that there's no copyright category that exactly fits it.  Technically it's not really a fair use image, but distributed under Vim's license, which is only "GPL compatible".  Other than that, I don't see why the image shouldn't be used, especially since other babel boxes use images.  -- Heptite (T) (C) (@) 21:46, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then should the image not have the licence under it?  Or link the licence?  Saying it's GPL compatible means nothing, saying it's under the FreeBSD Documentation Licence and linking it is fine, same with saying it's under the GNU Free Documentation Licence, but not having it there means it's not being marked right.    Janizary 22:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's the problem, technically it's none of these—Vim has its own license that is written to be compatible with the GPL.  The text can be found by doing ":help license" within Vim (you can see a copy here).  The Open Publication License applies to the Vim documentation, but I don't think that includes the logo, strictly speaking. -- Heptite (T) (C) (@) 11:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks strange, but it would be still nicer for the userbox than that ugly crystal_gvim. Mykhal 21:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image removal
Talk:Morse theory

message: I noticed that the figure of the torus has not the labels of the points corresponding to p, q, r,... Just take a look at the paragraph which starts as: "When a is less than 0", it makes reference to the points above, but one can not find them displayed on any picture.
Thank you
--Dieu reconnaîtra les siens 00:42, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

message: It seems to me that this article might benefit from a discussion of Smale's take on Morse theory (using handles) and also Morse-Smale-Witten theory (critical points of index k generate the k-chains in a chain complex with boundary operator given by \delta : C_{k} \rightarrow C_{k - 1} that sends a critical point of index k to a sum of the critical points of index k - 1 reachable by paths from that point counted with degeneracy. However it is also possible that this will just obfuscate the general message of the article and will just make things too complex, so I merely choose to mention this in passing rather than perform edits myself.RogueTeddy 06:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other generalisations

message: hi, could someone put in a reference for the connection to cayley and maxwell?  it would be great to know exactly what this contributor is talking about.  i've never heard of this reference before.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.34.193.55 (talk) 20:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cayley and Maxwell
Talk:Handle decomposition

message: Hello,
obviously these pages are written by non-experts. So if you want to understand handle decompositions and surgeries on manifolds
I strongly advise you to not read this pages. Instead look into the following book:
R.E. Gompf and A.I. Stipsicz, 4-Manifolds and Kirby Calculus, American Math. Soc. (1999).
: I briefly scanned the article.  Yup, it's not in good health. Rybu (talk) 19:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hint for learning about handle decompositions

message: I think that any good topological article should include some manner of picture to accompany it's analytic standpoint.  The founders of the field have the unfair advantage of starting with the pictures and slowly building the algebraic and analytic structures, but those beginning are asked to bypass the visual aspects which are central to the study of topology (one might even say that's the whole point).  If anyone has some manner of (public domain) images he could upload, I think that would greatly increase the value of this article.
Guardian of Light 15:25, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: I'm not happy with this page and I want to rewrite pretty much the entire article.  The direction I want to go with it is to show how handle decompositions are the natural way to adapt CW-structures to the world of smooth manifolds.   Okay, so I've done some major revisions but there still some things todo: 
* Smoothing of corners issue. 
* handle presentations of cobordisms 
* dual handle presentations, 
* surgery and h-cobordism links, 
* comparison to Whitehead's theorems about reducing the cell structure of CW-complexes.  
* the handle decomposition interpretation of Poincare duality.
* more diagrams would be helpful. We can probably poach some from various surgery / cw-complex related pages, too.  
 
That's all for now. Rybu (talk) 23:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Hall pass

message: They were created in school. Hence, they don't belong here, as Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Voortle 01:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many things were "created in school" in fact I believe school's purpose is to educate, potentially on how to create things/ideas. Hall passes are a part of modern school culture, and part of what Wikipedia documents is culture. Canadian-Bacon  (contribs) 02:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Also this discussion is already being had in this articles Afd, it doesn't need to be here as well Canadian-Bacon  (contribs) 02:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD
Talk:Champaran Satyagraha

message: It ought to be noted that the Champaran Satyagraha had its much older roots in the Indigo Riots of 1859/60 and the Tinkathia-system. Cf.: :de:Indigo-Unruhen --87.148.72.129 (talk) 17:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tinkathia System

message: How?? 27.62.68.141 (talk) 16:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are we alive 

message: Mild sound with slowly dictation 42.104.154.124 (talk) 16:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chamabaran movement 

message: Against thome was the champarana satyagraha launched 150.129.67.16 (talk) 08:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Rainford

message: Is Rainford even a village? or is this article about a parish? There is a lot of confusion. Gaia Octavia Agrippa (talk) 22:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although this is coming far too late, to aid the talk page, yes it is a village. Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs 00:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Village?
Talk:Mater et magistra

message: Please tell us the time frame and origin of the term(s) Mater et Magistra in referring to the Catholic Church  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.167.120.201 (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: mater et magistra by pope johnxxiii 2-3 paragraph 120.28.200.39 (talk) 07:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filipino
Talk:Red Dwarf: Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers

message: This article is unfinished - from what I can remember of the book, the article only seems to cover about the first 10-20% of the story. Furthermore, does the article really need to go into so much detail? The definition of "synopsis" is a brief summary. This article is anything but brief. Arganoid 22:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The redirect Roter Zwerg has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ArcticSeeress (talk) 04:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Roter Zwerg]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:AMBER

message: Mjhsieh:
: Potential topic in this entry
:: the contents in the package
:: the evolution of the force field
Anthracene:
I'm listed as one of the authors of AMBER, so I'm designating myself an expert. :) I've clarified and expanded the force field section and put in a brief summary of the software.
I hope no one is offended that I removed the reference to folding at home. In my opinion (working in the field) the use of the AMBER ff by the Pande group isn't really any more notable than its use by many other people. I'm willing to change my mind on this, though.
Anthracene 07:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A new page AMBER (file format) is needed, which should cross link to Chemical file format and use also the proper Category:Chemical file format category. JKW 16:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what the content of this new page would be, since there are multiple AMBER file formats, as described here: AMBER file formats. You want all of these to be described, or is there one in particular that you mean by AMBER file format (perhaps the topology file format)? --Anthracene 23:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are multiple file formats, then all should be mentioned and a proper short description and a link-out should be generated. This problem is well know, also for other chemical file formats, like the Chemical table file formats. And exactly this is the reason why we need another page for this. JKW 10:41, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Initial AMBER (file format) page created, feel free to extend it. JKW 10:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[AMBER (file format)]] needed 

message: The image actually used MM2 but I don't think there is a visible difference. Bensaccount 19:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I don't think the authors isn't necessary to be listed in wiki. Or at least, I think they should be listed on the Software section, not in the introduction. What do you think about that? Lý Minh Nhật (talk) 03:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Author

message: Does the potential energy function of Amber Focefield have improper dihedral term?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.236.198.181 (talk) 14:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Improper Dihedral
Talk:Dragon Ball Z: Ultimate Battle 22

message: Suggested move: Ultimate Battle 22 → Dragon Ball Z: Ultimate Battle 22. Its nice to know that the fans like to call the game Ultimate Battle 22 or UB22, but we should be using the correct title, just like we do for every other article on Wikipedia. Dragon Ball Z: Ultimate Battle 22 is also the reference (or title) name in the info box and the name used on the case itself. Sasuke-kun27 19:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd definitly support this move.--KojiDude (viva la BAM!) 21:46, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Move
Talk:Temporal database

message: This page is linked to by Fabian Pascal in http://www.dbdebunk.com/index.html in the section TO LAUGH OR CRY: 04/07/06 Wikipedia Talk: Temporal Database. 
--elwikipedista 01:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: There was a small section titled "Remarks/Issues" which clearly belong on the talk page instead.  The contents of that section (which I removed) were
: * The temporal example could do with rewording for clarity.
-Dmeranda 18:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remarks section moved to this talk page 

message: Decision time may also want to be recorded in a temporal database. Decision time is the time at which a decision was made to execute an event.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.37.230 (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a remark about other timelines (so you get a multitemporal database) and added Decision Time as an example. RonaldKunenborg (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decision Time 

message: Dear contributors, thank you very much, that is one of the best Wikipedia articles — simple, clean, and yet complete. Respect!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danilcha (talk • contribs) 13:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Such a good article 

message: Is there a way to keep track of relationships? Example: Some wing was attached to an airplane from 2014 through 2017, then it was a part of another plane from 2018 to 2020, then it was stored in a warehouse; and, then, since this year, it used by another aircraft. I guess that data might be stored in a many-to-many table (many parts, many planes) and not in the tables representing the objects. George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 05:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporal relationships 

message: German-language Wikipedia pages such as Temporal data retention and Temporal database have further information on this topic (for individual reading and/or for potential inclusion in this article / elsewhere in the English-language Wikipedia).
- Jim Grisham (talk) 04:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading
Talk:Abelisaurus

message: Is it really necessary to say that Abelisaurus is an abelisaurid dinosaur, because given the name "Abelisaurus" I'd say it's fairly obvious to even the most uninformed reader.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.148.242 (talk) 00:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not all readers will know that Abelisaurids exist, let alone that Abelisaurus is the namesake of the group. MMartyniuk (talk) 12:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Duh

message: In this documentary, the head of the abelisaur is feathered. There are some other jarring errors in this so-called 'accurate' sci-doc, but that one stood out to me. Should the higher level article reflect that ceratosauria are not thought to have developed feathers? 50.111.33.78 (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we don't know, and no reliable sources cover this, so we can't do anything. FunkMonk (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Amazing Dinoworld

message: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATHOS! 177.126.46.255 (talk) 17:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athhhhhóooooooóoooooóooo
Talk:Socialist Equality Party (UK)

message: Why is the article entitled Socialist Equality Party (UK)? As far as I know it is the SEP Britain - it doesn't organise in the North of Ireland. What's more it entitles itself Socialist Equality Party (Britain). PhilomenaO'M (talk) 15:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just the default national diambiguator from Socialist Equality Party rather than indicating the name they themselves use. Though I see that  refers to "the Historical and International Foundations of the Socialist Equality Party (United Kingdom)" so thare seems to be some variation in usage. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Alamosaurus

message: Sorry, italicizing the name Alamosaurus (and all other generic names like Parasaurolophus or Nodocephalosaurus) is not optional. It is not a formatting decision, it is correct scientific information. This is a scientific encyclopedia entry and should reflect correct science. Genus and species are always italicized. Even in an encyclopedia. Especially in an encyclopedia.
I have also repaired the citation for the article in The Dinosauria to provide correct information. Each chapter of this book is written as a separate paper, with separate authors. This chapter, and others, has been cited as such in many professional papers and should be here as well.
Formatting into sections is my preference, but I am not the only one reading this article so I will not reformat the subheadings as I originally wrote them. However, I will not let incorrect information remain in the article, and I would hope nobody else would either.
Sheep81 04:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: Titanosauridae, as a family-level taxon, has priority over Saltasauridae. Other families named after nomen dubia have not been abandoned, why single out this one? Also, see talk page of Titanosaur.Dinoguy2 01:31, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter if they have or have not been abandoned. Common consensus among scientists (at least among American and European ones) is to no longer use Titanosauridae. This is an encyclopedia, we don't decide whether things are consistent or not. Sheep81 02:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titanosauridae 

message: *Height- 40 feet (from foot to head)[2]
*Length- 120 feet (35-37 m) (from head to tail)[2]
*Weight- 100 tons (metric)[2]
Isn't that a bit reall wrong? He's not longer as 20 metres and weight not more as 15 tons. --JaroV (talk) 11:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong 

message: I thought it was generally believed that Alamosaurus was not a Saltasaurid but a member of the Nemegtosaurid family (at least the Nemegtosaurids have a Lurasian origin).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.105.47 (talk) 07:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alamosaurus is not a Saltasaurid 

message: I know we have a paragraph about it in the article already, but for those who patrol talk pages; Alamosaurus is not named after Fort Alamo in Texas. Any edits claiming it is are to be reverted on sight. Alamosaurus was named for the Ojo Alamo Formation, not Fort Alamo, despite what our own DYK says. Dromaeosaurus is best dinosaur (talk) 14:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A quick note; ''Alamosaurus'' is not named for the Alamo mission. 

message: The taxobox of this article lists every major subclade of sauropods Alamosaurus belongs to (Sauropoda, Eusauropoda, Neosauropoda, Macronaria, Titanosauria, Lithostrotia, Saltasauridae, Opisthocoelicaudiinae) which I feel is too long for the article. I've tried to remedy it by removing the display_parents parameter and setting it to 1 (from 3), but nothing changed. How can we shorten it? 49.144.207.182 (talk) 01:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly detailed taxobox