Talk:2005–06 South Pacific cyclone season

message: Sources and impact. Hurricanehink (talk) 13:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: There were seventeen numbered but the season summary says there were only 15. So two were later downgraded in their analysis? Good kitty 18:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: im not sure but The seasonal Summuary on Nadis website for 05-06 says there were 15 but also says that Wati was 16F and so does Padgett Jason Rees (talk) 03:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tropical Disturbances 

message: It says here that Wati had sustained winds of 155 km/hr using the average of winds over 10 minutes. It also says that Wati was a category 1 on the SSHS. But doesn't that mean that using 1 minute average sustained winds would place it at 175 km/hr? That would mean it's a category 2, as the SSHS relies on 1 minute average winds and not 10. Most articles go by that policy. Shouldn't it be changed? --UltimateDarkloid (talk) 19:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep the article is correct Wati was a cat 1 on the SSHS.Jason Rees (talk) 01:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

text: It would take up a lot of room to show both, so only the winds from the RSMC are displayed. The 1 min wind average is not adjusted from that - the number comes from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center. It is a Category 1 on SSHS and a Category 3 using Australia's scale. Both are virtually the same. Potapych (talk) 02:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

text: So Nadi and the JTWC don't only use different measurements, but they don't even have equal values. OK. Thanks for clearing things up. --UltimateDarkloid (talk) 12:27, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

text: The JTWC never have the same wind speed as the RSMC except sometimes when they do the EPac as they just C&P the NHC advisories Jason Rees (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Yeah, this always causes confusion. --UltimateDarkloid (talk) 17:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wati: 1 or 2? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on 2005–06 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.met.gov.fj/2010_2011%20TC%20Guide.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wamis.org/countries/fiji/fiji200510.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.niwa.co.nz/our-science/pacific-rim/publications/all/icu/2005-10/article
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64F7esNTE?url=http://www.met.gov.fj/documents/TC_Seasonal_Summary_05-061190690520.pdf to http://www.met.gov.fj/documents/TC_Seasonal_Summary_05-061190690520.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080807181434/http://www.afap.org/apcedi/2006/01/apcedi-alert-spsm-cyclone-urmil-06f-2.html to http://www.afap.org/apcedi/2006/01/apcedi-alert-spsm-cyclone-urmil-06f-2.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2006/summ0602.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2006/summ0603.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2006/summ0604.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion