Talk:Bill Ritter (politician)

message: This article needs a picture of Bill Ritter. What does anyone else think? Editor19841 00:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I'm really proud of how far this article has come, and consider it to be one of Wikipedia's best. When I started my work on the page, it contained only one sentence, but with some hard work and some research, we as editors have accomplished a lot by working together. I just wanted to thank everybody involved in the creation and forming of this great article for all your work. I think that after a good picture of Ritter is added to this article (hopefully next to "Contents"), I'm thinking of nominating the article to become a feature for Wikipedia. If any of you agree with me, please say so. I'm currently looking at possible pictures from Ritter's campaign site to add to the article, and if anyone has a suggestion... Editor19841 00:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progress, Well Done 

message: I'm nominating the article at the USCOTW elections, to see how it fairs. Please vote for the article. Editor19841 22:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominating for [[WP:USCOTW|USCOTW]]

message: Anybody know Ritter's B-Day? Editor19841 23:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate 

message: I suggest either finding out his children's birth years or not putting them in at all, because we don't want to update their ages once a year for the rest of their lives. Biruitorul 07:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree somewhat; while the kids should be mentioned in the article either way, it would be nice to see some years if possible. Any clue where to find out such info (as campaign site has nothing more than what we've got)? Editor19841 (talk) 00:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming he wins, I suppose we can call his office and ask once he's inaugurated. Biruitorul 06:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds right. Editor19841 (talk) 00:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Children

message: Ritter has yet to take office. Therefore he shouldn't be listed (in the info box) as Governor, neither should the Lt.Gov-elect be listed. Please wait until January 2007. GoodDay 00:52, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Governor of Colorado ?

message: Now that the election is over, shouldn't this article try to summarize details of the campaign instead of going into specific details about the campaign. This article looks like maybe it should be called the "2006 Colorado Gubernatorial Race" and not an article on Bill Ritter. Jcam 19:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had similar feelings. I think I'll move the debates over into the main article for the election. Any thoughts? Editor19841 (talk) 00:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be a good idea. Maybe a summary of the debates (as part of a campaign '06 section) would be adequate here. Jcam 16:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article will probably need to be summarized heavily. I think we can remove the survey information, as well as the Governor-elect's stance on the Referenda and Amendments, since they have already been decided. Trodaikid1983 22:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts on this article 

message: Seeing as how the elections are over, I am going to remove the election information pertaining to his stance on the 2006 amendments and referenda, as well as pre-vote polls between Ritter and Beauprez. If anyone objects, please let me know. Otherwise I will do this soon. Trodaikid1983 02:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Amendment and Pre-Election Tables 

message: A governor of a state is much more important than a TV anchorman. Bill Ritter should go directly to the governor not a disambiguation page. Tocino 7:52 P.M., April 20, 2007 (CST)
I disagree.  The anchor in question is a New York City anchor, the nation's largest market, and occasionally substitutes on national news shows. He's probably better-known than Colorado's governor.--Gloriamarie 21:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Ritter disambiguation page 

message: The shooter is named here although it might be wise waiting until all the informaiton is out before updating it. (Emperor 19:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shooting

message: :Image:BillRitterSOS2007.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BillRitterSOS2007.jpg