lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gribov ambiguity

message: I don't want to OR here, but the language used to describe what is desired of a gauge theory is almost the definition of a polar action. Is this recognized in the literature? ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Its OR. The standard understanding of gauge fields is in terms of a principle fiber bundle; the gauge group acts on the fiber. (in some cases, one works with the associated bundle). If you are a mathematician, you can just take a local section of the bundle, by fiat, no problem.  The problem arises because physicists like to pick a section, i.e. "fix the guage" by specifying some differential equation -- e.g. that the divergence vanish, or some-such, and this equation might specify several sections (or apparently, none at all) -- this is the Gribov ambiguity.  Thus, the problem is not with taking a section of a bundle, but with using differential equations to specify the section. Its also where the term "fundamental modular region" comes from: its the generalized concept of the fundamental domain for SL(2,R)/SL(2,Z) (and the word "modular" comes from modular forms -- the idea being that modularity and fundamental domains generalize in general to arbitrary Lie groups, and that gauge fixing plops you into one of these.).   Anyway, someone should add some text that says something like this to this article. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 19:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related to polar actions?
Talk:Multi-configurational self-consistent field

message: MCSCF should not be called a Post-Hartree-Fock method, it rather is an alternative to RHF. If at all, MCSCF needs RHF only to get a starting guess for the orbitals. But even that is not required. MOLPRO's MCSCF, for example, can happily converge wave functions even if the initial guesses are from atomic density guesses for the 1-RDM, completely without a Hartree-Fock calculation preceeding it.129.69.55.52
:I agree. Is there anyway now where it is called a Post-Hartree-Fock method? I have just done some minor changes but also added that MCSCF can be done directly in determinants as well as with CSFs. GAMESS(US) offers both methods. --Bduke 23:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nehru Planetarium

message: I propose turning this article into a list with individual articles for each entry --Srath12345 (talk) 02:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this. R1988 (talk) 07:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Turn this to a list

message: What fuck tatti is tatti 103.248.123.89 (talk) 08:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tatti
Talk:Nehru Zoological Park

message: Nehru zoologic park 27.116.18.5 (talk) 14:26, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the place located? What is it famous for
Talk:History of quantum field theory

message: While this article is pretty good, it has some issues.
Many primary (historical) references are cited, but very few secondary historical overview articles are referenced. Consequently the article reads like WP:OR. For example "A subtle and careful analysis..." implies some expert evaluating the paper and judging it "subtle" but no such expert is cited. Many or most parts of the article have this character.
The occasional secondary ref comes in oddly. In the middle of the section on the early 1950s we read "Two classic text-books from the 1960s..." with no references showing that these books where vital to the history of quantum field theory.
Quantum field theory is roughly speaking a model involving an infinite number harmonic oscillators. So it does not start with de Broglie's matter wave field model.
Willis Lamb, his Lamb shift, and his quantum radiation theory are not mentioned.
The article overlaps Quantum field theory#history which is itself too long. Johnjbarton (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues. 

message: Seems odd that this history, unlike almost every other history, is organized topically with dates going back and forth. It ends up reading like 12 histories rather than one. 
I get that this is complex topic, but I also don't get any sense of the development of the subject. It feels more like a "here's this and here's that".
Was this design choice deliberate? Johnjbarton (talk) 03:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topical vs chronological organization??
Talk:EE Times

message: This article looks overwikified. Just an opinion, so I will try to correct this. And also, what does exactly expression several decades of history mean?--BiblbroksTalk2me 18:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlinked 

message: EE = electrical engineering? --Abdull 19:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does EE stand for? 

message: I agree with Biblbroks that several decades of history is vague and needs to be corrected. I have added a 'vague' template accordingly. Nirmos (talk) 19:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vague
Talk:Pseudopotential

message: Apparently Hellmann's entry in Wikipedia says he died 1938, so how did he introduce the pseudopotential approximation in the 1940's?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.202.70.179 (talk) 02:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Has been fixed by now. Djr32 (talk) 18:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Energy consistent pseudopotentials are not mentioned here, they are widely used needs to be included.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annaberdiyev (talk • contribs) 05:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Energy consistent pseudopotentials 

message: Phillips pseudopotential section is confusing. It probably doesn't need a section on its own  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annaberdiyev (talk • contribs) 05:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phillips 

message: I will add the reference
to the "Further reading" section of the article. This open access study is a much more comprehensive successor to the already cited 2016 science paper by K. Lejaeghere et al. Both are community papers. In comparison, the new study covers more chemical elements and considerably more chemical environments. This gives more insights into the strengths and limitations of the pseudopotential approximation, e.g., when considering lanthanides. Transferability of pseudopotentials is also covered because of the different chemical environments for each element. Furthermore, the supplementary part S16 of the new study discusses improvements to pseudopotentials that were made during the work. These also affect two of the pseudopotential libraries mentioned in the article, i.e., the PseudoDojo and SSSP libraries.
If there are any objections to citing this new study, we can discuss this here.
In general I wonder whether this article should have a section on successes and limitations of pseudopotentials. The pseudopotential approximation in the end is an approximation, though a very successful one. For the layman it is difficult to intuitively see where this approximation is good and where it faces challenges. Probably at the moment this question is not yet extensively researched, but I think this is only a matter of time. GreSebMic (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of another verification study to the further reading section
Talk:Will Powers

message: The CD Baby addition reads like an ad.  I note that CD Baby has a Wikipedia listing that is currently being disputed.  Is the CD Baby link here considered an ad?  Should it be removed? R. Kevin Doyle 18:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD Baby 

message: I think the article Kissing With Confidence should be merged into this article.--Design (talk) 12:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I'm not a fan of tagging articles, but this section really needs some supporting documentations:
The album, entitled Dancing for Mental Health, uses affirmations set to music to poke fun at the self help entrepeners who "build the listener's inner self and encourage personal growth through the thought that anything is possible".
I remember the release of the album, and from what I recall, Goldsmith was completely serious in her desire to make a "self-help" record. Unless this viewpoint can be substantiated by an interview with Goldsmith or one of her collaborators, this POV should be struck. K8 fan (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Following up, I found a quote from Goldsmith on Carly Simon's web page that confirmed the comedy POV. K8 fan (talk) 00:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Thank you. Will you be transcribing the interview to text as well? K8 fan (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinion

message: Having heard the record and seen a TV interview with Will Powers, I'm pretty sure that the voice effect is not achieved with a vocoder but with a pitch shifter. These are completely different electronic techniques for processing a voice. If there's a preponderance of reliable sources that say vocoder, I will stand corrected, but I've changed the lead text for now. It should be uncontroversial that the Will Powers voice is at a lower pitch than Lynn Goldsmith's natural voice, however the effect is achieved. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocoder 

message: The VenusZine link is down; I found this one at Archive.org.  Do we use these?  https://web.archive.org/web/20110702080621/http://www.venuszine.com/articles/art_and_culture/art/2503/Lynn_Goldsmith Mwexler (talk) 03:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Padmaja Naidu Himalayan Zoological Park

message: * Padmaja Naidu Himalayan Zoological Park
* Padmaja Naidu Zoological Park
Atulsnischal 21:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate Articles to be merged into one
Talk:Yadavindra Gardens

message: The link to the Stuart Online text doesn't work  Niemin2 (talk) 21:55, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Borken link

message: - 
Pinjor gardan ka purana name ki ci  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4055:415:E0F5:938:FA8B:1805:7CB6 (talk) 12:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punjabi
Talk:List of tourist attractions in Kolkata

message: The intro was mainly just fluff before, with discriminatory statements and non-wiki suitable content. What should we add to the intro, and what are some good articles for reference to build off of?
Scarkrow03 • Talk 19:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving intro? 
Talk:Puri Beach

message: Found this page at random, fixed it up. im new to setting up galleries. these are to my eye a better selection of photos, but i didnt format the gallery correctly. I wont revert if the old photos are added back in, but i would appreciate the photos i added staying, and someone formatting it better. Sand artist had an article deleted earlier this year, but i would say he now makes the grade as a notable sand artist and wp subject. (note two spellings for last name, pattnaik and patnaik)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Gallery formatting is done and info box added, thanks  Ritwikbmca (talk) 07:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: no, thank you. i particularly like the fishermen image as the lead photo. This is now a well done, if brief, article.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:15, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  fixups
Talk:Rajouri Garden

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 13:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Ribbon (rhythmic gymnastics)

message: Does anyone have info on the sport itself instead of the requirements of the equipment? The other pages don't concentrate on the weight of the balls, bats, position of the goals, etc. They discuss the activities, scoring, and records in the sport. Naniwako 23:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Seems like a bias issue, but not only should this article address ribbon dance's history in East Asia but Chinese ribbon dance probably needs an entirely separate article of its own apart from the modern international competition. — LlywelynII 12:32, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:BIAS]]
Talk:Wu–Yang monopole

message: This article said just "Wu and Yang"; no other names for them.  So I look around the internet and found this reference to a book by Tai Tsun Wu and Chen Ning Yang.  It's about monopoles, and it's the right era, so I went with it.  Chen Ning Yang is a good link and looks like the right sort of person and the right timeline.  Tai Tsun Wu is a red link.  I see that Chen Ning Yang collaborated with Chien-Shiung Wu.  Are these two Wus the same person?  I am going with it, but leaving this note about my sloppy research. — Randall Bart 05:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, that's the one. I added the reference to where they first published it. David  10:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wu who?
Talk:Rashtrapati Bhavan

message: Hello everyone why not use the photo herewith LegalEagle 14:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article fals under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 04:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=103717. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 01:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The World's largest palace page indicates it doesn’t make the top 10 largest current abodes of a head of state, with Turkey, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, Brunei, Vatican, Czech Republic, UK, Belgium, Russia, ... all having larger official residences.83.104.51.74 (talk) 16:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Palace claim
Talk:Vis (island)

message: The Liburnian people were not Illyrians. 82.35.40.241 00:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Liburnians

message: The article doesn't tells the coordinates of thi sisland.It is 43°4'52N and 16°7'14E.See this site: [] to see the coordinates.Agre22 (talk) 22:53, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite. Your co-ordinates are in the sea, I'm afraid. Ostrvo, pretty close to the centre of the island is at 43° 2' 42N, 16° 9' 6E. See . This site agrees too . Best, AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: LoL... another sock of those banned Italian nationalist guys moved the article. Its well known the Google test heavily favors "Vis" (104,000,000 hits ) over "Lissa" (2,540,000 hits ). Could an admin fix this and ban the sock by the quick procedure? --DIREKTOR (TALK) 09:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I left a note here, but it seems I may have been wrong in AGF'ing this move. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 10:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Its like the 30th sock of the same clique of Italian nationalists that got banned years ago. They keep resurfacing now and then trying to "italianize" whatever toponym they can link to Italy in any way. Continued vandalism over a very lomng period. Block evasion and personal attacks. Ban on sight. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 12:24, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How about move protection (if this continues)? --DIREKTOR (TALK) 16:33, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Move protection seem like a good idea, but I'm not sure where to request that. For a ban I believe you would have to request a CU - hardly worth while in my opinion. If the user tries to move the page without discussion again that would in itself be a blocking reason I should think (I'm not an admin around here though). Finn Rindahl (talk) 16:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Silly move

message: The claim the population of the Vis was nearly entirely relocated to Italian Dalmatia following world war one seems improbable.  In my own knowledge of the island's history, I've heard of nothing of the sort.  The Italian version of the article says that in the 1900 census, less than 5% of the island spoke Italian, further adding implausibility to the claim.  The claim either needs a reputable citation or should be removed. 129.72.153.18 (talk) 18:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Depopulation after WWI?
Talk:Reformed Druids of North America

message: * This article does have references, so I removed the "Unreferenced" template.  I changed it to a "One source" template because the content relies so heavily on ARDA.
KLuwak (talk) 00:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: A Google books search returns over 200 books. Certainly this org is notable and these books could possibly be used to source much of the content of the article so it doesn't rely so much on primary sources. Yworo (talk) 23:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability and sources

message: I added the paragraph denying Clifton's speculations.  Was you there, Charlie?  I was.  --Howard Cherniack  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherns Major (talk • contribs) 00:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on Clifton's take on Druidic sources

message: I came here looking for the reformed non-aristotelian druids of North America, but there is no mention of them. In fact, I came to this page from a Google search for "reformed non-aristotelian druids of North America". I don't think they deserve their own page, but they should at least get a mention here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.157.77 (talk) 12:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformed Non-Aristotelian Druids of North America

message: A few recent edits have tried readjusting the category between Category:Pagan religious organizations and Category:Neopagan religious organizations.  Frankly, I don't think either is appropriate.  The article states explicitly that many members do not consider themselves neo-pagan, and many align with non-pagan religions. -- Elphion (talk) 18:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Sewri Fort

message: A review is in progress to see if this article matches the GA criteria. Comments can be found here: Talk:Sewri Fort/GA1 SilkTork *YES! 12:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article did not meet the GA criteria and it has been withdrawn. Comments and suggestions can be found here: Talk:Sewri Fort/GA1. SilkTork *YES! 12:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review
Talk:Srimanta Sankardev Kalakshetra

message: I have suggested that the contents of the Srimanta Sankardev Cultural Centre article should be merged with this article because the two articles appear to be about the same organisation and campus. Could someone who knows more about this topic please advise, or correct me if I’m wrong. Thanks — Hebrides (talk) 09:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion

message: :* Shankardev is wrong spelling for the saint. Correct spelling is Sankaradeva - see Maheswar Neog, Sankaradeva, National Book Trust, India, 1967 - 111 pages http://books.google.com/books/about/Sankaradeva.html?id=5Q8hAAAAMAAJ 
* As Hebrides suggested, merge this whole thing with other. Put as many organizations/sub-organizations of Sankaradeva Kalakshetra inside same article in an appropriate manner like section, sub-section, etc..
Kurmaa (talk) 00:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Shankardev'' is wrong spelling

message: * What is the matter with Ahom people? 
* Why are they keep creating so many names for one saint? 
* Are they trying to confuse whole World flooding with multiple names? 
* Or what?
* For the term Ahom see - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Assam&pe=1&#Ahom_Ethnocentrism_and_Ahom_Supremacy
Kurmaa (talk) 00:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Questions'''

message: *You use the name Sankaradeva Kalakshetra only so that you do not confuse foreign readers, including folder-name - Correct spelling is Sankaradeva - see Maheswar Neog, Sankaradeva, National Book Trust, India, 1967 - 111 pages http://books.google.com/books/about/Sankaradeva.html?id=5Q8hAAAAMAAJ
*Observe that most times Ahom people writs about Saint Sankaradeva they keep creating alternative names for same saint. What is the moral here in doing so?
*For the term Ahom see - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Assam&pe=1&#Ahom_Ethnocentrism_and_Ahom_Supremacy
Kurmaa (talk) 08:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Use name ''Sankaradeva Kalakshetra''
Talk:Shivneri Fort

message: found by shahji{father of shivaji}}
Sanjay Jadhav: In the period of 1930, Shahaji was in the service of Ahamednagar Court. His father in law Lakhuji Jadhav was in the service of Vijapur (Bijapur) Court. In the month of Shivaji's birth, Lakhuji Jadhav & Shahaji were at war with each other. The history may be corrected accordingly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjayjadhav1998 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is Kashmir not shown as part of India in the map used here?
Why can't we get that map removed from here?
येथे वापरलेल्या नकाशात काश्मीर भारताचा भाग का नाही?
आपण हा नकाशा येथून काढून टाकू शकत नाही, असे का? VJ2507 (talk) 10:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  नकाशा अचूक नाही