Talk:Dania Ramirez

message: Why is this article categorized under American categories? If she is from the Dominican Repbublic then the categories should be Dominican Republic categories, not American. NorthernThunder 05:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dis pic dont do her justice shes a shitload mo caliente!TeePee-20.7 06:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change tha pic 

message: According to her MySpace page her date of birth is November 30, 1979. According to  Yahoo her date of birth is November 30, 1980. I'm inclined to believe the MySpace page, thats why i changed it to November 30, 1979.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.84.30.94 (talk) 13:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 

message: Thus, it shouldn't be in the filmography. Rosenbluh (talk) 16:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeh, I agree. But looking at other actors' pages, it is common to list both TV and film appearances under "Filmography". Is there a better title for this section? (NB there are other TV things listed here, too, alongside Sopranos.) 81.98.251.134 (talk) 16:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree. In deference to having a Filmography, Televisionography, musicography, commercialography and the hundreds of other sections this line of thinking would give rise to. We can check with WikiProject:Film but I'm pretty sure this is widely accepted except in trade or specialty publications (like IMDB). What would you suggest we list it as? It should be listed, a show like The Sopranos is notable enough that it should be listed. Besides, she currently has a role in the TV how Heroes and it's not a film either so we're gonna need to know where to list these if not under Filmography. Padillah (talk) 16:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I just noticed other actors with similarly distorted filmographies; I suspect the convention started by folks starting to ad TV roles to actual filmographies and it just stuck. The term filmography is just a buzzword. In the context of this article, and others like it, a phrase like Notable acting roles would be clearer (because it is not a buzzword or Portmanteau) and more accurate (because the expected meaning would match up with its actual meaning). This discussion reminds me of a David Pogue piece that was published yesterday. Rosenbluh (talk) 18:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry but both the outlook above and the article mentioned are being pedantic. If this were confusing people that'd be one thing. There isn't a single reason to differentiate film from TV acting. The productions end up transitioning from one to the other quite frequently, blurring the line even more. Do you honestly think someone watching The Hulk on HBO will mistake it for a TV show from the 70's? Or, given the complete lack of a Soprano's movie, we are confusing people into thinking there's a Soprano's movie they have missed? I don't see it happening. I'm a programmer by trade, I appreciate trying to be as specific as possible. This is too far. Padillah (talk) 20:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

text: No one is saying that TV and film roles need to be separated. I don't know how I can prove that a significant percentage of readers would be confused, but I don't see how you can show otherwise. But, I can say this: if you are looking through a filmography you would assume all of the items were films, unless you specifically recognized one as a TV show. I understand that arguing over word choice may seem trivial, however, it just seems that you're using (or defending) poor usage of jargon where normal English words would be clearer. Why would a phrase like Notable acting roles be inferior than filmography? Rosenbluh (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Sopranos]] is not a film 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dania Ramirez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130713153412/http://a to http://a
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140624024247/http://www.imagen.org:80/news/imagen-awards/2014/06/nominees-29th-annual-imagen-awards-announced to http://www.imagen.org/news/imagen-awards/2014/06/nominees-29th-annual-imagen-awards-announced
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dania Ramirez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928064850/http://www.lipstickalley.com/f15/dania-ramirez-marries-director-john-beverly-amos-land-478455/ to http://www.lipstickalley.com/f15/dania-ramirez-marries-director-john-beverly-amos-land-478455/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified