lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abel–Jacobi map

message: I left a note at Abel-Jacobi map as well, but I can't let this one go without one.  Whatever happens with regard to my suggestion there, I think that before merging this thing anywhere it should be improved a lot.  The sentence (!) itself is quite impenetrable and it doesn't give any indication why it should be related to the Abel-Jacobi map (though one can guess) or indeed, just about anything else. Ryan Reich 22:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well, one reason it may appear incoherent is that it's almost identical with the Mathworld article with the same name.  DavidCBryant 17:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The seventeen-year-old part of me (the part that used to read MathWorld like I now read Wikipedia) wants to protest, but...I agree.  Too bad, really; math is so easy to write poorly, not as easy to write well. Ryan Reich 20:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I also figured something like that since we do seem to be inspired by MathWorld a lot, but if you go to "Terms of Use" in the small print at the bottom of any article there, you'll find that they are not at all free and open. Ryan Reich 20:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have gone through and tagged the articles that I created. I was confused because I had seen other "inspired" content (i.e. copying) from mathworld, and I figured that it was GFDL like planetmath (bad assumption to make).--Cronholm144 05:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A reaon for incoherence 

message: Seeing this merge notice reminded me of a more important potential merge: with Jacobian variety, since so much of the material depends on the explicit definition of the Jacobian.  I don't know anything about these classical theorems (it's an accident, really, that I know the classical version of the Abel-Jacobi map rather than the modern one) so I don't know why Abel's curve theorem is related to the Abel-Jacobi map.  Seems to me it should really be placed in Abelian integral.  Note that all four of these articles need significan expansion and are rather stubbish at the moment.  However, as a look over them it seems clear that they should all be tied into Jacobian variety, since that is the unifying feature and will create a node that will hopefully attract some potential editors (rather than letting them find these isolated stubs).  At the moment I think that the relationship of all of these articles to Jacobian variety is stronger than their relationships to any of each other, and that this is the logical place, at the moment, to link or merge them.  Charles Matthews: you proposed this merge; could you give your thoughts on slapping a merge-with-Jacobian variety notice on these, rather than the current one? Ryan Reich 22:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Abel's curve theorem]] 
Talk:Victoria Theatre (Dayton, Ohio)

message: I made this page!!!! User:MarkDonna
I updated the Victoria Theatre (Dayton, Ohio) article as a stop-gap effort to at least increase the piece's accuracy.  I don't have sightings to offer, having limited time to dig in.  But I was involved with the Victory Theater Association for a number of years and come to the subject with a certain clarity.  The body of this article, as I read it this morning, was mainly unacceptable, poorly-expressed, and rife with inaccuracies.  A most basic problem here is with the naming and re-naming of the theater from 1866 through 1989, when it was ultimately re-built as a performing arts center.  Secondly, there are numerous missing highlights, including the theater's illustrious career as a destination for legitimate actors and comedians of some renown.  It should be also noted that the house was retrofitted for cinema use, sometime near the end of WWI.  Its Disney Theater years should also be researched and described.
This is an article which needs rebuilding, particularly in the realm of snytax, and certainly within the realm of building a fascinating story out of real historical knowledge. User:Strideman —Preceding undated comment added 16:19, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Goong (manhwa)

message: I'm going to work on translating the names into Korean, if anyone notices any misspelling, please don't hesitate to correct it. :) Talchum 20:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I finally have my hands on the first volume of this series. So far they have 18 released in Korea, so it's going to get long. I think we should make the "Books" section another article and post a link to it on the main page (Goong). Also, the characters' section needs to be split. Any comments/ suggestions? ~Hyakurei (talk) 20:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: thats a good idea, but the character descriptions are really short so it doesn't matter  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.215.199.72 (talk) 03:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Against. The article needs serious clean up in line with wikipedia standards so it does not need to be split.--Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 15:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 
Talk:Hider in the House

message: More stupid changes have been put on the article so can someone please change it all and lock the article ASAP, thanks.
HITH Fan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.126.3 (talk) 11:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Changes 

message: Someone added the following to the bottom of the article:
Side Note:
A new series has just finished being filmed to be shown in January 2008, I was in the last episode teaching an unsuspecting dad to skateboard, I can confirm that the parents do not have a clue as to there being a celebrity hiding in their house, neither did i until the last day of filming where i was told i wasn't filming for big kids (like i was asked) but really for Hider In The House
I had to remove it, of course, but if anyone can think of a way to re-write it so that it can be re-incorporated into the article, please do so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.53.21 (talk) 09:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing content
Talk:LCC (compiler)

message: The linked host page ( http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32/ ) has been returning a "403 Forbidden" for several months now. Multiple attempts to contact the department or a webmaster have gone unanswered. It is possible the page has been deleted or moved, but it is unclear how to get in contact with anyone who would know anything about this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.102.150.67 (talk) 18:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  LCC-win host page gone?
Talk:Places in the works of Madeleine L'Engle

message: Feel free to reassess, but that's my best guess. -- Karen | Talk | contribs 23:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Queen of Air and Darkness

message: I would like to suggest we go with "The Witch In The Wood" since that is the original title of the novel, whereas "The Queen of Air and Darkness" is a later and much more concise reprint with virtually the same text. Furthermore, the article makes use of the book cover for "Witch", rather than "Queen", so it should naturally come to fold with one another. This is also to avoid confusion with the upcoming third installment (entitled "Queen of Air and Darkness") in Cassandra Clare's The Dark Artifices trilogy.
Zach (talk) 13:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: agree strongly, this would also avoid confusion with the Poul Anderson novelette of the same name. Surely the usual procedure would be to have an article under the original title, describing both versions, and pointing to the final fixup (iirc) in The Once and Future King?  --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Recommendation to rename article

message: The source given for the title - Housman - is primary & may be OR. The dag page for "The Queen..." links to Shakespeare's Queen Mab amongst several others although I don't find the title in the speech from the play. The Mab article implies she is a folkloric figure -- perhaps the title comes from the lore? In any case we need a secondary source to say authoritatively White was quoting Housman (or whoever) NB: Check the other articles with this title per dag page --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 15:39, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title source 

message: Regardless of whether the artice title is changed, it would be an improvement if the differences between TWITW &TQOAAD were described, possibly also the version in The Once and Future King if that is substantially different. Don't have access to the first two at the moment -- in any case that would be OR wouldn't it?  --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Witch in the Wood comparison
Talk:Aili Jõgi

message: I have started the discussion at Category talk:Terrorists#Aili Jõgi. -- Petri Krohn 11:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Terrorists]] 

message: Who, exactly, are the people in this picture? --Camptown 10:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not named, the byline just reads 'EÕVL juhatus lahtisel koosolekul 11.12.04 "Memento" Liidu ruumes' - "Ex-Student-Freedomfighters' Union's leadership having an open meeting in 'Memento' Union's offices on 11/12/04". Edgar Vares-Barbarus 11:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: People on photo 

message: My grandfather was claimed to be a German spy and collaborator. He was deported to siberia with his whole family and later killed. While it is interesting to note, that real reasons were his farm which was turned into a kolhoos. Also, he was apparently really bad spy as he didn't have much else to spy on other than his cows.
He didn't know much about germans either, as german military never visited the location. Suva 19:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article is not about your relative, to the best of my knowledge. We're talking about a person who wrote memoirs about being a member of Erna group. Reference provided. RJ CG 20:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Spys don't wear military uniforms identifying which side they are on, that's why they are called spies. Erna wore Finnish uniform. Martintg 21:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spies
Talk:2007 Armenian parliamentary election

message: The results don't add up yet, at all. They're likely half-correct, but we need to wait for entirely official results (those from elections.am contradict other official sources)... —Nightstallion (?) 07:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they're correct now; not from official sources, but they seem to fit. —Nightstallion (?) 08:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caution 
Talk:When the Boat Comes In

message: The link seems to be for a different person (79.190.69.142 (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Geoffery Rose

message: Ford, the central character of the series, dying in the final episode is clearly relevant for inclusion in the lead, per WP:LEAD. Please discuss before reverting. Leaky Caldron 11:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite correct Leaky Caldron. As stated in some of my edit summaries WP:SPOILER also applies. We are an encyclopedia not an advert for the show. MarnetteD | Talk 14:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the SPA nature of the edits in the last few days we may have to put in a RFPP. MarnetteD | Talk 14:01, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Adaptive Simpson's method

message: The proposed algorithm is totally unrelated to that stated in McKeeman's article. McKeeman subdivides the interval into *three* subintervals, and recurses on them. Further, error estimates are based on some difference between certain estimates, however not on asymptotic expansion, where the 15 in this article stems from. Certainly, this algorithm will work. It's much more straightforward and easier to grasp as McKeeman's is, however, they're not the same.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezander (talk • contribs) 09:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You will see how they are related if you have read Lyness 1969. Lyness replaced trisection with bisection, coinciding with Kuncir 1962. --Artoria2e5 contrib 15:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to McKeeman's algorithm? 

message: At the end of the first paragraph "quadratic" should be "cubic" since Simpson's rule is exact for cubic polynomials.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.236.89 (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: Shouldn't these two lines
double Sleft = (h/12)*(fa + 4*fd + fc);                                                           
double Sright = (h/12)*(fc + 4*fe + fb);
be:
double Sleft = (h/6)*(fa + 4*fd + fc);                                                           
double Sright = (h/6)*(fc + 4*fe + fb);
?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.251.150.71 (talk) 19:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  C code 
Talk:Keith McCready

message: I noticed that Mike Selinker removed the AMERICAN SPORTSPEOPLE category on the bottom of the article.  I inserted it back.
I do not understand why a professional cuesports player would not be included in this category.
Pocket billiards is a sport, and as such, I believe Keith McCready's name belongs there.
I tried to go onto Mike Selinker's TALK PAGE to ask why he thought it prudent to remove this category from this article, but every time I tried to post a question on Mike Selinker's TALK PAGE, in an effort to ask him his reasoning, it would automatically log me out of Wikipedia.  There was no way I could ask him this question.
As such, I am posting my inquiry on this talk about of the article.  Please advise. RailbirdJAM 19:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Removal of Keith McCready as AMERICAN SPORTSPEOPLE Category? 
Talk:Schuster Performing Arts Center

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 22:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I have removed the long caption "Volunteers showing up...", as this doesn't describe the picture very well. Although, there are some people in the foreground, I don't think it is important for the reader to be told who they are. I have instead moved the "nickname" text "The Wintergarden Lobby" down to be the caption. From the building's website, I think that is a better description of what the picture shows. Have I got this right? -- John of Reading (talk) 10:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption re-arrangement 

message: Is this aricle supposed to be an april fools?! legit it says "Dayton Ohio " firsly the town gets a sus name and also the chances of this being a random article surprises me i was thinking about ohio when i pressed randomand i end up here ·_· *ohio is a sus state name anyways nvm if you did read this comment please ignore it like you nver read this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GamE.aut0rizerYT (talk • contribs) 22:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone else know about this?
Talk:Arsenal F.C. 2002/03 season

message: I've removed the prod. Frankly I have no idea why anyone would want to delete this. Sure, the article is in bad shape: it needs references, context, wikification, etc. But one can perfectly well imagine this becoming a featured article one day. Sure it would be about a topic of fairly low importance but there's no doubt that this is a valid topic. Pascal.Tesson 00:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Arsenal F.C. 2002-03 season

message: I've removed the prod. Frankly I have no idea why anyone would want to delete this. Sure, the article is in bad shape: it needs references, context, wikification, etc. But one can perfectly well imagine this becoming a featured article one day. Sure it would be about a topic of fairly low importance but there's no doubt that this is a valid topic. Pascal.Tesson 00:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees

message: This was a very high-quality article, all things considered. It was extremely informative, and I'm quite impressed. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 20:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oh

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 13:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA status reviewed — kept

message: Lede fails WP:LEAD, does not adequately summarize entire contents of article. -- Cirt (talk) 20:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede too short
Talk:List of Nigerian states by date of statehood

message: Abia 41.190.2.19 (talk) 12:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation and Creators of Nigerian States 

message: What is event planning? 105.112.75.240 (talk) 16:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Event planning 

message: na khadija Dan so  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.113.30.41 (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  dan SO
Talk:European Broadcasting Area

message: has anyone updated this defintion to take account of the present non-existance of the USSR? (and so be we need to update the text here)? 82.13.83.244 00:13, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  USSR 

message: It would be great if we could have a map showing the region for this article 80.4.103.181 (talk) 17:28, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: I think there should be more information added into the article about what channels and shows the European Broadcasting Area transmits to the people in the different regions. Also, additional information on the channels would be a good idea. Jenrosales12 (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Information Needed 
Talk:Alexander–Spanier cohomology

message: If the article admits that the description is not generally called "Alexander-Spanier" but rather "De Rahm cohomology with compact support," then why isn't the page titled the latter?  This page could then give the more general case.  The current situation seems decidedly inane.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.190.102.81 (talk) 01:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  De Rahm vs. Alexander-Spanier
Talk:Algebra (ring theory)

message: There is a separate page for associative algebras.  This article should be merged with associative algebra or expanded to include the nonassociative types.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.223.89 (talk) 02:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page should address nonassociative algebras 

message: The merge is in process right now.  Please don't revert until it is finished  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.131.154 (talk) 14:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merging old article with associative algebra 

message: The more general definition is shorter and easier to state.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MephJones (talk • contribs) 21:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I take it you haven't read the article yet. Sławomir Biały (talk) 19:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The definition should include noncommutative algebras

message: Help this little guy out, he's all alone in the world:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example_of_a_non-associative_algebra 131.220.107.25 (talk) 16:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to the orphan page 

message: Given a commutative ring R, when is it true that every ring homomorphism f\colon R\to S with domain R realizes S as an R-algebra? Is it equivalent to the unique homomorphism \mathbb{Z} \to R being an epimorphism in the category of rings? GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:44, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The image should lie in the center of S and that's also a sufficient condition. -- Taku (talk) 04:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

text: More generally, this statement generalizes to monoids in any cosmos with monic coproduct injections. A cosmos is a complete cocomplete symmetric closed monoidal category. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

text: I am talking about every homomorphism with domain R, not a particular one. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Algebra homomorphism

message: My understanding of homomorphism leads me to believe that the first two conditions given in the first sections follow from the nature of algebras not from the nature of homomorphism and that the third condition is the rule that makes a homomorphism what it is. Input appreciated--Cronholm144 04:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is clear, and your edit definitely corrected a mistake.  Had they left out injectivity and required surjectivity, I would assume they were talking about simple algebras.  At any rate, since they weren't mentioned in the article, I linked them in with a discussion of inner automorphisms. JackSchmidt 05:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not expert on the subject, I am trying to understand what is morphism and homomorphism
a = b * c
d = e + f
I think multiplication and addition are homomorphic. Applying what is written in Group homomorphism I can think of morphism h: 
h(u * v) = h(u) + h(v) 
This is a kind of commutative diagram:
 6  = 2 * 3
      |
      |  h
      |
      V
 12 = 4 + 8
(actually you could use any numbers that are valid operations) 
h(2 * 3) = h(4) + h(8) 
h(2 * 3) is h(6), and image of h(6) is 12
image of h(2) is 4,
image of h(3) is 8
so the h(2) + h(3) results in 4 + 8, and that is 12
I could upload an image that explains  the Idea much better. I know that Wikipedia is not a place to study mathematics together with others, but I will upload image(s) if no one objects. The image is here --Pasixxxx (talk) 16:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example maybe 

message: Why is this discussion starting with associative algebras? I would have expected a more general discussion of the preservation of a mapping that preserves a general algebraic structure before moving to particular examples. Am I misunderstanding the term?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.33.131.2 (talk) 14:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The general discussion that you are asking for is the subject of Homomorphism, and also of Morphism and . Therefore, I have edited the article for linking to the first article in the first sentence, and listing the two other (that are more technical) in "See also" section. D.Lazard (talk) 15:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

text: My opinion. I think this article is redundant; ring homomorphism has more examples and not sure why examples here cannot appear there. On the other hand, homomorphism covers a more general situation like a homomorphism between not-necessary-associative algebras. —- Taku (talk) 22:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article is essentially a WP:content fork, I would not oppose if this article would be redirected to Homomorphism. This would imply to edit the list of cases in the latter article for including algebras that are not ring, and avoiding circular redirecting. D.Lazard (talk) 08:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2019
Talk:Major characters in the works of Madeleine L'Engle

message: Feel free to reassess, but as with the Places article, this is my best guess. -- Karen | Talk | contribs 00:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassess