lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SED Systems

message: This article is an international space networking suppler from the prairie province of Saskatchewan.  It was Saskatchewan's first advanced technology company and has become a worldwide Telecommunications and satellite company for defense industries and XM Radio Satellite.
SED systems is part of a team working with the Canadian Space agency to develop the International Space Station (ISS) and is a part of the  Mobile Servicing System (MSS) team.  The technological list of the many endeavours that SED systems is a part of is huge in this capacity.  This article is a stub, this section will continue to grow, however perhaps someone with technological education / experience would also like to add their two cents worth to help develop the article. 
The article is definitely a stub,(infobox has been added) and could use an image, a few more links, as well as lengthening. This article has been newly created, and I haven't had time to go through my digital pictures as of yet to place an image on the page-however I believe I have one, as I was out at Innovation Place the other day...hang on...I am called away at the moment.  I don't believe that deletion due to notability would be why it should be reduced to ashes.  SriMesh | talk 16:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Greatest Hits (Sara Evans album)

message: Some Things Never Change (Sara Evans song) now redirect here.  It was a top-40 Billboard song but didn't break the top 20.  The edit of 15:15, 24 May 2008 by Martin4647 contains the previous article.  Should the redirect be reverted?  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Things Never Change 

message: I removed the part about Love You With All My Heart being a single, since it has been pulled. (HowIFeel 13:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Love you with all my heart
Talk:Greatest Hits (2005 Blondie album)

message: I'm sorry to say that but look at the cover, there's no sign plus, but a ampersand, so what's the compilation name? "Sight & Sound" I guess and not "Sight + Sound".
let check on the Blondie website…  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.195.19.145 (talk) 13:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  & versus + 

message: Talk:Greatest Hits: Sound & Vision D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion found at...=
Talk:Richard Barber

message: I have gone over the article and have removed some promotional material, cleaned up some overly academic language, and scutinized it re: NPOV. It now seems neutral to me. There are a couple of positive statements, but they are borne out by RS's. The term "praise" re: UK reporting on the subject's book is borne out by the media coverage I have seen, and I have included three relevant quotations in the refs. I have added four RS's to the article, and I believe that it now has adequate secondary source referencing. Therefore, I have removed the tags re COI/NPOV and concern about lack of secondary sources. If anyone has concerns about this, drop me a line on my talk page. EMP (talk 05:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no connection whatsoever with the subject. Had never heard of him before this morning. EMP (talk 06:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: coat of arms....i believe I have original horns with flags that we're his coat of arms! I really need to talk to Richard william barber!  please Lisa dooby Thompson (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Edward of Woodstalk
Talk:Harmonizer

message: A Harmonizer (among other things) is a 19" rack mounted effects unit manufactured by Eventide of New York USA since the 1970's. The Harmonizer H949 includes two digital delays and an Anti-Feedback system which was often used in concert live sound setups during the 80's. Some features of the Harmonizer model H949 exist today as a Plug-In for digital recording.
Why is the Harmonizer redirected to Pitch Shift??
82.11.121.200 (talk) 20:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Hi-Teknology 3

message: 1st single riding down the freeway Young Buck Feat Outlawz and Dion  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.117.189.77 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Epistemological psychology

message: Could you explain more clearly what you mean by this term? Where have you seen it used? What are your references?  --Mattisse 16:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on name similarity, I suspect that the originator of the page may be the person whose work established "Episteme psychology...as a separate discipline in the late 1980s" (according to the article). I have asked the user for references at his or her talk page, but so far none have been forthcoming. The editor has not made any contributions since August 25th and may not be actively monitoring Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl 17:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Richard Carlson (author)

message: Is the publish date for Don't Sweat the Small Stuff ... and It's All Small Stuff 1997 or 1996?  Amazon (not a bastion of reliable info) has it as 1996.
# Paperback: 272 pages
# Publisher: Hyperion; 1 edition (January 2, 1996)
# Language: English
# ISBN-10: 073380084X
# ISBN-13: 978-0786881857
MrYdobon (talk) 18:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Sweat Date 

message: article states year of death as 2006. anyone have any more detail to add? 219.90.254.243 (talk) 03:43, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  death? 

message: I believe Sierra University, which awarded his supposed doctorate, operated a few years and then permanently closed because it was basically a scam. Shouldn't the article reflect that the PhD isn't real?Purplethree (talk) 18:34, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education
Talk:Soviet occupation of Czechoslovakia

message: Regarding Soviet occupation of Czechoslovakia can be found here:
It would seem Czech Republic considers the period 1968-1991 an occupation.--Molobo 00:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a POV of one particular author, by all means not a universally established one. I am returning the tag per the objections above. Please no more undiscussed removals. Use talk page. --Irpen 03:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not a personal homepage Irpen but official page of Czech Republic.
--Molobo 09:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Sources that describe the post-war history of the country without calling it being occupied until 1991 include Britannica and Columbia encyclopedia. It shows that "occupation" is not a mainstream consensus of the condition of the country.  --Irpen 20:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When you brought out your Columbia encyclopedia reference, I checked it out, but the talkpage was then suddenly lost, possibly in the Ghirlandajo's Great Move-Go-Round campaign.  In any case, given that Columbia encyclopedia does not mention Soviet occupation in the article on Lithuania either, and Lithuania's being occupied by the Soviets is a well-established fact, I would say it's probably an artefact of Columbia encyclopedia's editing policies, and not an indication that Columbia encyclopedia does not believe there was such an occupation. 泥紅蓮凸凹箱 21:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Thank you for your valuable personal opinion. But guess whose opinion, yours or CE's, counts more? --Irpen 22:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

text: The Encarta article you linked is narrowly devoted to the 1968 event, not to 1945-1991 period that the article claims the "occupation" lasted. Secondly, if out of three major English L. encyclopedias only one uses the term at all, it just shows that this is not a widely held view. It may be used in the article in the referenced form but not in the title and not even in the lead if presented as an all-agreed fact. --Irpen 08:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ?? The article claims 1968-1989 as the span of the occupation. Britannica definitely mentions the Soviet invasion and occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1968 . Martintg 11:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official position of Czech Republic
Talk:Horizons (Parkway Drive album)

message: I think the song lengths are wrong because I own the album (got it on the day it came out, got a free key chain aswell) and my song times are different. Can someone else with the album confirm this? Jerry teps 06:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it's area difference or maybe the person who put them down got them wrong...? 61.68.14.61 06:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I linked the CD cover to this article and updated the image page for fair use here.
Kresock (talk) 06:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album image 

message: the Deluxe Edition of this album coming out 28th of September on play.com has got like twice the amount of tracks and only on common track (horizons) atleast i think. heres the list:
   1. In The Beginning
   2. Coming Together
   3. First Show
   4. Making Progress
   5. The Truth
   6. KWAS
   7. Uncharted Waters
   8. Other Side Of The World
   9. The Chode
  10. (Ten) Things Get Ugly
  11. Only The Best Hotels
  12. California Dreamin
  13. On The Road U$A
  14. Epitaph
  15. Ups And Downs
  16. Horizons
  17. The New Europe
  18. Around The World
  19. Sweatfest
  20. A Different Point Of View
  21. 12/12/08
  22. Home Sweet Home
  23. Rolling Dice
I demand an explanation to this! Jonjonjohny (talk) 14:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deluxe Edition
Talk:Pershing Map

message: It would be nice to have a link to an image of the full map.  Does anyone know where it physically is or if there are digital copies online?  Presumably it should be accessible in government archives somewhere and also in the public domain. -- Beland (talk) 07:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Full-size map

message: Note that this page has been requested for its protection to be removed due to very low amounts of vandalism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.254.163 (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection level change
Talk:Timothy Botts

message: While the present article is a bit of a stub and tends toward fan-ishness, Botts is a much-published artist who has been nationally known since at least the late 1980s. I'm in the middle of developing a bio article on someone else, so I can't work on this one just now, but I wanted to make a note here to forestall deletion as a non-notable bio. Lawikitejana 16:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Flaxby

message: As far as I can tell Flaxby has always been part of the same parish as goldsborough - certainly a google search today only brings up the one council.  Why was it listed as its own civil parish?  did the 1971 (?) act split the old parish of Goldsborough?--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 09:05, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the OS map there are two separate civil parishes Goldsborough and Flixby not a single civil parish, there may only be one joint council but it is two civil parishes - I have reverted. Keith D (talk) 13:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil Parish
Talk:Bayan Har Mountains

message: I boldly moved the article to Bayan Har mountains as this seems to be the preferred transscription of the name now:
google scholar hits:
*bayan-kara-ula: 6 
*bayan-kara-mountains: 24 
*bayan-har-mountains: 49 
Yaan (talk) 22:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bayan Har 

message: Isn't it? Böri (talk) 13:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  = Bayan Kara Ula 

message: I came here from the Wiki page [of alleged extraterrestrial beings] and find no mention here of it.  I realize it might seem ridiculous, but it is a Wiki page. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dropa people" aliens
Talk:Guanzhong

message: ofpases/montns.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.246.181.52 (talk) 11:45, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  map? 
Talk:Haicheng District

message: It is proposed to move Haicheng → Haicheng (disambiguation) and Hacheng, Liaoning → Haicheng. For discusion please see Talk:Haicheng, Liaoning. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename Haicheng, Liaoning to Haicheng. 
Talk:Whirl-Mart

message: If they don't point out they are protesting/demonstrating "how ridiculous consumerism" is, then what is the point?  You will just look like another shopper, sure you may be moving slowly, but there's always people moving slowly in the store.  It just sounds like an excuse to feel like you make a difference without making a difference at all.   Mwv2 16:50, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hunchun

message: Korean Balhae?  Isn't it disputed so shouldn't it be Bo-hai/Balhae Kingdom?  
Changed it to Bohai/Balhae and removed Korean to make the article neutral.  
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.222.129 (talk) 17:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Kate Bush (EP)

message: The Canadian cassette, at any rate, translates this title, badly, as "(The Infant Kiss)". Varlaam (talk) 06:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Un baiser d'enfant"
Talk:Camp Carroll, South Korea

message: You can't cite sources about a Unites States Military installation.  If you're a soldier, you know you can't, and if you're a civ, you know you shouldn't.  I added some ticks to the article about the surrounding area, because many people coming to the sticks of ROK should know that there is a place to get a cheeseburger and fries, if you've had your fill of palm trees and lighting up Grauman's Chinese.  Facts not observable from outside the base (also, observations of base actions that may draw inference to the location and importance of base personnel, armament, communications capability, capacity, or even the color of the grass outside post is not cool.  I have not had the privilege to serve, but out of respect to those who have, I have deliberately redacted portions of the article I intended to submit.  Please use discretion when editing an article about this or any other United States Military installation.  Love, Tarkaan (talk) 01:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:La Biblia

message: 26 December 2014‎ Gorobay (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (146 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Gorobay moved page Talk:La Biblia (album) to Talk:La Biblia: unnecessary disambiguation) (undo | thank)
::Reverted, not primary topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:17, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Restore
Talk:Estonian Hound

message: Once again, I'm having trouble with making this section of the infobox visible...  --Canarian (talk) 18:03, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: did you solved the problem?--Estopedist1 (talk) 16:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it seems to work now. --Canarian (talk) 13:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox: Official recognition
Talk:La Cucaracha (album)

message: One of the other Ween album sites, Pure Guava, maybe? implies that this album was recorded on a four-track like their earlier work.  From the sound I would say that can't possibly be true, but either way something should be changed to reconcile those two articles.
Matterson52 (talk) 23:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Four-Track
Talk:La mia risposta

message: A recent edit claims, "The Spanish version [of La mia risposta] is Pausini's most authoral album in that language, with her being involved in the writing process of ten out of the thirteen tracks."  Pausini, however, begs to differ:
:"Escucha es el disco que por primera vez he escrito y producido sola y es el primero con el cual gané el Grammy."
::—Blanco, Patricia R. "Laura Pausini: 'Si paro de cantar, paro de vivir", los40.com [Spain], November 24, 2006.
Edit has been undone. Oskarg956 22:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Most authoral" 
Talk:Obscure II

message: How bout some spoiler warnings?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.114.231.198 (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read up at WP:SPOIL -- in a nutshell, we don't use spoiler tags nor do we consider "spoiler" content something that should be deleted. ∴ Therefore cogito·sum 20:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler

message: I came here from WP:RM to correct the page name, and did a quick scan of the article afterwards. I removed two sections that violate Wikipedia policies and guidelines, namely, WP:GAMEGUIDE, and WP:ADVERT. The section about game features reads like the back of the box, which is unacceptable for an encyclopedia. The section about weapons isn't relevant, and it violates WP:GAMEGUIDE. The last line in the "Storyline" section was incoherent; I tried to fix it, but am not sure if that was what the original author was trying to say. If not, alter it accordingly. Parsecboy (talk) 12:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My recent edits 
Talk:Ladies Love Outlaws (Tom Rush album)

message: I am not sure that the footnote on the track "Hobo's Mandolin" is needed in a Wikipedia article. I moved it to a more appropriate location, but I think that it should be removed altogether. I will wait a few days to see if there are any comments before I do so. Note that the particular note that was added was the only contribution of that editor, ever! Frankzappatwin (talk) 11:46, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, no takers so I have removed it. Here it is if it is needed in the future,
  *Note:  The correct title for track 2 is "This Here Mandolin" by Michael Peter Smith, who was never paid for its use on this album.  Godon Bok also recorded the song, and he called it "This Old Mandolin".   Michael's songs are published by Bird Avenue Publishing-ASCAP.Frankzappatwin (talk) 10:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote for "Hobo's Mandolin"
Talk:Mong-Yu

message: that is not in China territory , it is situated in Myanmar. pls see this http://www.google.com/mapmaker?ll=23.981234,97.986374&spn=0.219581,0.263672&z=12&lyt=large_map&hyaw=145.53860385342796  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.81.165.119 (talk) 21:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Location
Talk:Nanling Mountains

message: *Move. According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese), Nanling should be renamed to Nanling Mountains. --Neo-Jay (talk) 06:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Doesn't it seem ridiculous that, in 2023, we still don't have a good map showing where this mountain range is located? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of decent map
Talk:Northwestern China

message: I totally agree that the section should be split into a new article. See Outer Northeast China as a related example of a separate page, as both were ceded to Russia as mentioned in the article Unequal treaty. Outer Northwest China is a historically distinct region and has little to do with the modern Northwest China except a partial similarity of names. --Geekdiva (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article?  
Talk:Leih Sebtaha

message: Every single bit of information in this article hasn't verified ANY source and some of it seems false to me. Your so called link to the so called professional review at Amazon.Com is completely pointless. In addition, the singles from the album are completely false. Blytonite (talk) 21:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: You must verify the sources and your so called "profeessional reviews"
Talk:Qiantang River

message: It's actually in 2007 that a group of surfers made it the first time (a French and a Brazilian) breaking the record of the longest wave: 17km during 1 hour and 10 minutes. They also broke the law since it was forbidden until then to get close to the water because of the high number of casualties in the past. A quick Google search will bring up article of the event and scans of Chinese newspaper.
221.3.79.172 (talk) 09:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First (safe) surf) 
Talk:Livid (Nightmare album)

message: As per the comment from almost 8 years ago, the title of this album is Libido, calling it "Livid" is in direct contrast to the album cover which shows "Libido" written out directly below the katakana. 23.28.218.164 (talk) 21:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Shaksgam Valley

message: Worried that the title of the article is wrong.  If you look clearly at the map the area is known as 'Shaksam' Valley.  It may cause confusion.82.45.38.39 (talk) 16:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, it's the other way round. The map is wrong. It should read Shaksgam. But thanks for telling, I've overlooked that one before--00:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Title
Talk:Surmang

message: Anyone know the names (with Wylie) of all nine or ten monasteries in the traditional complex of monasteries? We have two mentioned here but not the others. Thanks. - Owlmonkey (talk) 01:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Monastery names

message: The article claims:
* “The Surmang monasteries were again largely destroyed during the Chinese invasion of Tibet and the subsequent Cultural Revolution.”
That's a rather sweeping statement. “Chinese invasion”: Qinghai was conquered by the Qing dynasty in 1724 and had been a province of the Republic of China since 1928. Maybe “Chinese invasion” is supposed to mean 1951, the beginning of the honeymoon between the Dalai Lama and Mao Zedong? Or March 1959? Anyways, the Cultural Revolution did not begin until 1966. That's hardly “subsequent”.
But let's also have a look what the three sources that are given have to say to support that claim:
*“The Surmang shedra is known as Surmang Düdtsi-til. It was part of the complex of monasteries of Surmang until the destruction of much of the site in the 1950s.” (The Surmang Project, Konchok Foundation)
Anonymous author, no sources quoted, but the site clearly sides with Tibetan political groups in exile. No details, and not mentioning the “Chinese invasion”. Not a proper source.
*“The monastery was destroyed during the Cultural Revolution and rebuilt poorly in the 1980's.” (Trungpa RInpoche XII and Surmang Monastery)
Same as above. Not a proper source.
And this is what Chögyam Trungpa writes in the third source quoted, his book Born in Tibet:
*On p. 153 the author alleges that Chinese troops plundered the monastery: “The Chinese army stayed at Düdtsi-til for about a month. They had intended to make it a permanent centre, but on receiving orders from army headquarters they evacuated the place, carrying away everything which might be of value to themselves.” He doesn't say that they destroyed it—quite the contrary: “My bursar ... had gon to Düdtsi-til himself with a few monks and found all the buildings intact, so he had arranged with some poor herdsmen still living in the neighbourhood to take charge of them.” (p. 154, emphasis added).
Nothing about the Cultural Revolution. And the author is clearly biased. Not a proper source.
The three sources are not very reliable, they contradict each other and presentation in the article is either not based on the sources quoted or deliberately distorting them.
If no reliable sources (see also: questionable sources) are found and/or a historically more accurate presentation will be given, I'm going to remove the sentence (see burden of evidence). —Babelfisch (talk) 07:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Chinese invasion and subsequent Cultural Revolution”
Talk:Xinzheng

message: Does anyone have any more information on the history? (76.79.9.129 (talk) 16:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Yengisogat

message: When I first saw this article (looking for an article on Huangguan Shan) it said the mountain was also known as Crown Peak and had Crown Peak hyperlinked. However I found this linked to a Crown Peak article about a DIFFERENT MOUNTAIN (in Antarctica). I therefore removed the hyperlink as it was misleading.
I think someone needs to either create an article about the himalayan mountain called Huangguan Shan (to avoid confusion) and hyperlink to that, or to create another Crown Peak article and a Crown Peak disambiguation page to go with it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.237.8 (talk) 07:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Crown Peak Disambiguation needed