Talk:English cannon

message: *Support  I'l pass it now myself but the nomination was not complete.  I'll leave it a day for further comment.Peter Rehse 04:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: I note that the calibers have changed over time - while I find the current information to be *very* useful, would it be good to add information as to when the calibers became a bit more standardized, like when they were in 42-pounders, 32-pounders, 24-pounders, 18-pounders, 12-pounders, 9-pounders, 8-pounders, 6-pounders  (see Naval artillery in the Age of Sail for example).  In other words, we have a snapshot from one erra, maybe we need a broader view?  It would be great to have the range, weight of those guns etc for this more standardized artillery, as we have for the somewhat older and archaic selection in the current article.  Observer31 17:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes in calibers?

message: The link to Saker in the table leads to the demi-culverin article. When doing a search for Saker, you get directed to the bird's page.  I think we should improve this no?  Observer31 17:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Saker

message: The title of this article is somewhat misleading, or at least awkward. What it describes are "cannon used by England (or Britain)", not a specific type or class of cannon. Other than being cannon used by a particular nation, there's nothing that justifies the current title format. I don't think there's a need to actually move the article, but the wording in the lead should definitely be improved. In fact, there's a pretty good argument to simply allow this article to deviate from the normal practice of including the actual title of the article in the lead.
Peter Isotalo 20:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "English" 

message: The image :Image:Royal Artillery Cap Badge.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Royal Artillery Cap Badge.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on English cannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724173345/http://maryrose.org/life/life1.htm to http://www.maryrose.org/life/life1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . Community Tech bot (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion