lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pedro Bloch

message: I'll try to translate it. 
The following is the original in portuguese: 
:: Pedro Bloch
:: Nascido na Ucrânia em 1914, Pedro Bloch foi um famoso escritor brasileiro. Sua família imigrou ao Brasil no inicio do século vinte. Ele é conhecido por suas peças teatrais como “Dona Xepa” e “Mãos de Eurídice.” Pedro Bloch escreveu mais de cem livros, um deles sendo “Pai, me compra um amigo?”
:: Bloch já foi musico, teatrólogo, e medico; formou-se em medicina em 1937 na Faculdade Nacional de Medicina.
:: Das muitas experiências, mais de 50 do seus livros foram inspiradas quando ele atendia crianças. A sua mais conhecida obra teatral foi “As Mãos de Eurídice,” que estreou no dia 13 de maio de 1950 e repetiu-se mais de 60 mil vezes em mais de 45 países diferentes. Dois anos depois, ele fez outro sucesso teatral, “Dona Xepa,” que até foi novela na Rede Globo. Pedro Bloch também foi jornalista, e participou na revista “Manchete” e no jornal “O Globo.” O interesse do Pedro Bloch em teatro surgiu nas visitas dos grandes atores na propia casa dele. A seguir, um paragrafo que o Bloch escreveu: Uma menina estava conversando com a sua professora. A professora disse que era fisicamente impossível que uma baleia engula um ser humano porque apesar de ser um mamifero muito grande, a sua garganta é muito pequena. A menina afirmou que Jonas foi engolido por uma baleia. Irritada, a professora repetiu que uma baleia nao poderia engolir nenhum ser humano; era fisicamente impossível. A menina, então disse: -"Quando eu morrer e for ao céu, vou perguntar a Jonas". A professora lhe perguntou: -"E o que vai acontecer se Jonas tiver ido ao inferno?" A menina repondeu: -"Então é a senhora que vai lhe perguntar."
:: Pedro Bloch morreu aos 89 anos de idade, de insuficiência respiratória aguda no dia 23 de fevereiro de 2004. Ele morreu no seu apartamento em Copacabana e foi enterrado no Cemitério Comunal Israelita do Rio de Janeiro.
:: “Dicionário de Anedotas,” “Você que falar melhor?” “Samba No Pé,” “Teco-Teco,” “Um pai de verdade,” e “Mãe, cadê meu pai?” são vários dos livros escritos pelo Pedro Bloch.
Mariana Splendor 01:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bob Plamondon

message: Seems like a clear-cut case to me.Speciate 01:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Englesea-Brook

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) 
Peter I. Vardy 20:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Puyehue National Park

message: Presume there should be a section on the effects of the 2011 Puyehue eruption on this national park EdwardLane (talk) 10:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects of 2011 Puyehue eruption 

message: „ The average annual rainfall is 450mm (17 in.).“
That would be about as much annual rainfall as Casablanca, close to the Sahara desert, has. Definitely wrong as Puyehue is famous for its very high amount of rain each year, might be 4500 mm. Gan (talk) 21:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in annual rainfall
Talk:Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park

message: I intend to rewrite this article, providing more substance. We would need to see the 1926 decree that created the Park to know why it was created and what were the aims. Does anybody know where one can consult that basic document? Anybody around to discuss? Conaf states a park area of 231.000 hectáreas - is there an error somewhere or did Conaf "disaffect" 22 000 ha? What is a "Reserva Nacional"? The "Reserva Nacional Llanquihue" is mentioned without link; I have not found any consistent data about it, except that it has 33 000 ha. I have deleted until we have something to say about it. There are 3 photos of the Petrohue river, as if this was all that is to see in the park. I'd leave only one of the river, preferably one that does not duplicate the one in the article on Petrohue Waterfalls, and insert other Park sights: Puntiagudo, Tronador, the catamaran or a hotel, Perez Rosales pass, Tronador glacier, ... The link to Sernatur
* Parque Nacional Vicente Pérez Rosales
is dead. I deleted it and inserted a link to CONAF instead. The referenced article by Louis Lliboutry published by USGS is good but contains almost nothing specific to the Park. It could provide the meat for an article on "Glaciers of the Wet Andes". I have deleted the non-pertinent call from Nothofagus dombeyi to Lliboutry's paper. I finished deleting the citation of this paper for rainfall information, as that should come from other sources.
In editing Flora I have deleted attempts to characterize this Park by what is NOT there: araucarias, roble, ... I stumble on, and resist, a trend to replace good indigenous names by not so good ladino names. For example, notro is widely used and designates only Embothrium coccineum; while ciruelillo, small plum tree, is a non-pertinent name for a species of the Proteaceae that does not even remotely look like a plum tree. Muermo designates only Eucryphia cordifolia, and this tree is definitely NOT in any way an elm tree, ulmo, etc. The encyclopedia should remain eminently usable but should also be serious and avoid promoting poor or frankly bad use of terms.
--Lupo Manaro (talk) 11:20, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was the person who added the tag and I am not a bot. You must not remove the tags without addressing the issues. The reason for putting the tag is that little information in the article is verifiable in the references given. Jespinos (talk) 01:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

text: You should acquaint yourself with Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and it was the aim of my previous comment. Judging by your comments, you didn't read the page I suggested. The sources of the article are unclear and an inline citation more or less doesn't make much difference. See also Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. And please no make personal attacks. Jespinos (talk) 20:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Briscoe Group

message: Briscoes is a major retailing chain in New Zealand.  The article shows the age of the company (back to 1781).  Thus is it notable by its size and age, as well as market share.  Thus it is not clear what the justification is for the tag inserted by User:BMRR claiming that the article lacks notability. --Pakaraki (talk) 07:14, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As was recently pointed out to me by another Wikipedian from New Zealand, merely being large, old, and popular does not make a company "notable" by Wikipedia standards. The guidelines at WP:CORP state that there must be significant coverage in reliable secondary sources in order to establish notability. Since this article is completely unsourced, notability (by Wikipedia standards) has not yet been established. Adding some good references would fix that. :-)  –BMRR (talk) 17:06, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Mary Ann Nichols

message: Hi folks! 
The book The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper details the lives of the canonical five and offers insights into their lives. The book is well researched, and I edited this page to add some of its content. Namely, the book calls into question whether or not Nichols was a prostitute, as no real evidence suggests that she was. 
--Lcrawfish (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see this thread concerning Rubenhold's book. There is a lack of consensus as to using her book as a reliable source. — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated claims that Nichols was a prostitute 

message: The article says that Charles Allen Lechmere (who it calls Cross and adds the note "birth name Lechmere" when in fact Lechmere was his actual name and Cross was the name of a stepfather he falsely gave as his own on testimony) found the body. Given that Lechmere is considered a suspect in the Ripper murders and appears on the Jack the Ripper suspects article, should we not change it to say he claimed to have discovered the body while also mentioning that he might have been the actual killer.--RM (Be my friend) 14:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In English-speaking countries, it's not unusual for stepchildren with no contact with their birth father to adopt the name of their stepfather. In fact, I would say it's fairly usual: see Gerald Ford and Bill Clinton. There's nothing strange about Lechmere adopting the name Cross; it's culturally the norm. DrKay (talk) 15:42, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lechmere/Cross
Talk:Avemetatarsalia

message: Hi Dinoguy2, long time no write. You've been doing cool stuff. I'll take your word for it as far as avemetatarsalia having precedence. How would you feel if we include the fifth paragraph in the first paragraph, so that the people whoa re redirected will know right away that the two clades are synonymous?Jbrougham (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

message: So, I was trying to locate an actual defnition of what an Avemetatarsalian is but the closest thing I could find on this page is "Archosaurs that are closer to birds than crocodiles" which very vague to say the least. Now, I've found a website (http://mason.gmu.edu/~gbirchar/Dinobiol/dinochar.htm) that provides some defining characteristics if you scroll down and I was thinking of adding them to the page, usurping the heading "classification" and giving the information already under that title a new name like "Etymology" or something equally more fitting. I think this would be more accurate and informative than what we have now, thoughts? The Talking Toaster (talk) 16:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In modern classification, groups are defined by their relationships, not their physical characteristics directly. So that kind of information should be included under Description. Anyway, that page doesn't seem to cite its sources, so we wouldn't be able to make the information verifiable. MMartyniuk (talk) 18:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Too much waffle?
Talk:The Rapeman

message: apparently, there were 6 Raipuman films, though the information on the IMDB now shows only 4, but used to list all.
the band "Rapeman" was a Steve Albini project, following the disbanding of "Big Black", and Albini's success as a producer. Judexdot1 01:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After examining some the references cited in this article and I've found they reiterate the factual errors with in this article. It's reasonable to assume that they're sourced from prior iterations of this article and as such are circular references. I notice that the article appears to have been originated by a non-native English user, this may be the source of these errors. It should be noted that the Japanese wiki article does not include the errors I've recorded in the English wiki. Fourisplenty (talk) 11:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veracity of article
Talk:Norm Sanders

message: Being one of three along with King O'Malley and Bob Charles doesn't seem right as of 2015. What about Mike Nahan in WA and previously Kristina Keneally in NSW?
: I queried its veracity back then, but it's certainly no longer true if it ever was, so I've removed it.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 12:13, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Americans in Australian Parliaments
Template talk:Miss Universe

message: I firmly believe that Miss USA and Miss Teen USA should be kept off this template.  Although all three are controlled by the Miss Universe Organization they are all inherently separate entities.  The appropriate setout is for their to be a link to the MUO article, not to the other pageants (as is the case with the Miss USA and Miss Teen USA templates).  I further believe that there needs to be further discussion with all involved editors (not just myself and User:Kanabekobaton) before any change is made. PageantUpdater  talk • contribs  23:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes
Talk:Ostenaco

message: Colonial implies at some level being under the power of a foriegn authorit.  Ostenaco never recognied auhority beyond the Cherokees.  He should not be classed as colonial.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is one of a number of discussions (started by John Pack Lambert) that are forked from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 November 16#Category:Tennessee colonial people. Rather than conduct discussions of this topic in a dozen different places, let's have just one discussion. Please continue the discussion at the WP:CFD page. --Orlady (talk) 06:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not colonial
Template talk:W-cookie

message: I'd like the option of suppressing the signature, or dispensing with it altogether. I find myself adding other templates, such as edit summary reminders, to the end of welcome messages, and it just doesn't work well with the auto-sig. Other templates don't do this, either. Otherwise, great template. Xiner (talk, email) 02:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The auto-signature
Talk:Kraków Cloth Hall

message: Google Advanced Search excluding http://en.wikipedia.org returns following results:
* "drapers hall Sukiennice" = 4 results (plus 1 from same source)
* "cloth hall Sukiennice"      = 683 results including Polish government, UNESCO , and BBC
Please adhere to Wikipedia:Naming_conventions and more specifically the principles of WP:COMMONNAME. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (precision) states: "go with the rule of thumb, and use the more popular phrase." Please accept these principles before attempting to edit the article any further according to your personal preference. --Poeticbent  talk  15:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cloth Hall 
Talk:WiiCade

message: I'v never really done any serious formatting on Wikipedia, so I don't really know how to use the formating. I'm gonna read the tutorials soon, but in the mean time, can somebody help format this? --Mikco 02:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome. Now all we need is to improve the content. :) --Jbanes 01:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks Jbanes. This should bring in some people. Master44 gives this cancer a one out of five 16:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Should WiiCade really be considered a company? Because the template on the right of the page is a company template... GaeMFreeK (talk) 18:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company? 

message: The news where this article was based seem to be from 2007-2008 and the project page doesn't seem to have more recent news. Should a note be made on the status of the project, as "no longer on development" or "canceled" or "still in progress"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.244.194.120 (talk) 16:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current?
Talk:Mosquera

message: The Spanish original text: 
: Mosquera A surname of Spanish orgin, in particular, of Galician orgin. Family Crest states (Spanish):Gallego. Procede de la casa solar del fundador de esta familia Ramiro de Mosquera tomando su apellido de su hacienda Mosquera. En el siglo V ya figuraba enlazado con MOSCOSO, uno de los cuatro solares más antiguos de Galicia. Los Mosquera se extendieron por Galicia, Las Castillas, Extremadura y América. En Galicia uno de los solares más antiguos radicó en el Coto de Villar de Payo Muniz, a dos leguas de Orense. Otro hubo en la villa de Villarino de Corso. Según etimologistas el lugar de nombre Mosquera hace alusión a un lugar donde crecen gran cantidad de ACES y se deriva de la palabra MOSCON que en la lengua del lugar hace referencia a dicho árbol. Una rama de la familia se asentó en Portugal donde tomó la forma de MOSQUEIA. Los siguientes nombres figuran en las listas de la Orden de Carlos III: Gabriel Mosquera, Luis Mosquera y Julián Mosquera. Antonio Mosquera, nacido en España fue soldado de las guerras de Flandes y Gobernador de la Isla de Puerto Rico. Pasó a Chile con un refuerzo de mil hombres, llegando a Santiago en el 6 de Octubre de 1605 
Mariana Splendor 02:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Framework interpretation/to do

message: * Combine sections "six days and three categories" and "seventh day" into one section which clearly explains the framework in it's entirety.
:: This has been done. I suggest that the "seventh day" section be renamed to something like "God's rest" because that is what the section addresses, moreso than the framework itself. Tonicthebrown 01:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bear Hunter

message: Are any of you actually Shoshone?  Anyway, I've edited the article accordingly, with references from Bear Hunter's own tribe.  The tribe admits that select Shoshone bands did attack settlers, but asserts that it was not Bear Hunter's band (NWB).  It's because non-Natives fail to understand the division lines between Shoshone bands (they're not a single, unified tribe!) that misinformation keeps being spread about this event.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.190.159.148 (talk) 22:01, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bear Hunter was not involved in the attacks on settlers.
Talk:Black Bob (Shawnee chief)

message: There appears to be a large quantity of source material about the Black Bob Band. With patience and dedication, this could be transformed into a much higher quality article ... Djembayz (talk) 06:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has potential to become a B class article or better ... 
Talk:Cameahwait

message: This information is extremely incorrect.  Sacagawea was not sold to white people.  She was traded by various Indian tribes, and I don't think Crows were one of them.  Eventually, Toussaint Charbonneau won her in a game of something like dice and took her as a wife.  He lived among the Hidatsas or the Mandans (who lived near each other) when the Corp of Discovery wintered among the Mandans.  You also say under Charbonneau's page that both of his wives were Shoshone.  This is also not true.  Only Sacagawea was Shoshone thus why she was taken on the expedition.
I also do not think that Cameahwait gave horses to the Corp.  I believe they traded for them.  But he was Sacagawea's brother.  She chose to continue with the Corp rather than stay with her family.  (Big mistake on her part, I think.) Rainbowchk 20:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As noted in another comment here, the information about Otter Woman is incorrect, as is the horses being given as gifts. 47.20.150.228 (talk) 20:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual errors
Talk:Charlo (Native American leader)

message: Is :ca:Charlo referring to the same guy? I'm pretty certain, but I decided to hold off.--T. Anthony (talk) 10:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this be on the Charlot (disambiguation) page? Charlot is one of the spellings of his name. What do you all think? 
VanillaBean28 (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page
Talk:Restoration Path

message: As of October 2019, the web site http://restorationpath.org appears to be offline. Has the organization shut down for good?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rapidrater (talk • contribs) 12:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web site 

message: This article seems to be written in a biased manner, the whole thing is mostly the controversy. I think there should be a bit more about the organization and stuff about it than there is now, because now the whole article is pretty much just controversy. I am against this group but Wikipedia has to be written in a non-biased way. Imjustheretomakebonusstage (talk) 05:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, if there honestly is nothing good to say about these people, we shouldn't make something up just for the sake of a perception of balance. That's what the media do, which is why they give equal time to both sides of non-existant controversies (such as creationism and homoeopathy). TRiG (talk) 10:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: :Love In Action →  – This organization has changed its name. See: http://restorationpath.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/March-2012-Color.pdf. Wikipedian77 (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just do it and note that the group has changed it's name as of March 2012. Insomesia (talk) 22:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: How do I go about doing it? Wikipedian77 (talk) 23:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Be sure to add into the intro when the name changed. Insomesia (talk) 00:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: This article was already tagged for over-reliance on references to primary sources. There are a lot of other problems, some of which I have tried to fix. I have added tags for undue weight (there is very little in the article about the organization about from criticisms and controversies), missing citations (there is a lot of uncited material), and a potential need for a complete rewrite. SunCrow (talk) 09:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: I finally founded this on the net: The reason why they dissolved is because of the movie Boy Erased.
Ministry Announcement | Restoration Path (archive.org) Ndplinhdam (talk) 15:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we include the reason they dissolved?
Talk:Crazy Bear (Assiniboine chief)

message: This article contains many lengthy quotations from primary sources, which is a concern given the guidelines around quotations and WP:NOFULLTEXT. I am a relatively new editor on WP and still honing a lot of my skills, so it will be some time before I am knowledgeable enough to properly tackle the issues here with the overuse of quotations. If there are others who are interested and able to work on this article together, I wanted to bring the issue to a wider attention. Elfangor9 (talk) 22:02, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotations
Talk:Deskaheh

message: It appears as if the source material for the article, "Seven Generations of Iroquois Leadership: The Six Nations since 1800", contains numerous errors. It does not provide any citation for several inaccurate statements - specifically, the statement that the Canadian military and foreign policy was controlled by the British until the end of Dominion status in 1949, and that there was a divide between those who wished to become Canadian citizens and those loyal to the British Crown. For instance, the concept of Canadian citizenship did not exist at law until the passage of the Canadian Citizenship Act, 1946. Prior to this point, the only concept of the term "Canadian citizen" related to immigration regulations on entrance into and out of the country. This concept was also a subset of the concept of British subject. See History of Canadian nationality law.
In addition, the formal subordination of Canada to the United Kingdom came to an end with the Statute of Westminster 1931. While Canadian control of its own military and foreign policy de facto occured after the Chanak Crisis, 1931 would be the latest date on which the author might be correct. He may have conflated the end of British rule over Newfoundland in 1949 with some end of control over Canada, but I don't see there being an arguable case for this being correct. 
In light of the above, I propose to remove the inaccurate portions of the article. I have no knowledge whether the other facts cited by Hauptman are correct, so I have no position on whether to leave those in. Homagetocatalonia (talk) 20:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies in Source Material