lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Malcolm Johnson (journalist)

message: == Disambiguation needed? ==
In googling Malcolm Johnson I found that there is a football player by that name who, apparently, doesn't have a Wiki article himself. How shall we deal with this?--Mantanmoreland 17:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Johnson graduated from a Baptist school, but I am unclear how this puts him under the aegis of the project that relates to Baptism.--Mantanmoreland (talk) 15:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically, because he went to the Baptist school, which is within the scope of that project. Not necessarily the best answer, but the real one. At this point, one of the things I'm going to try to do with the Christianity project and its various subprojects is try to fix the incomprehensible mess that is the :Category:Christianity. This involves trying to determine which subcats that are currently within the category really belong there. If and when that categorization is fixed, and if it is found that this article was only included because of then-changed categorization, as the person who placed the banner, I'd probably pull it myself. However, right now, determining the exact scope of any project is somewhat difficult, so I'd ask anyone to forbear removal of the banner until I and the rest of the project can work to fix the categorization schema. If any parties here were to want to join in such discussion, I know that I would personally welcome any input you might have to give. John Carter (talk) 19:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. I was wondering because most everybody belongs to a religion, and hence can presumably be in the scope of a project. That would tend to make those projects unwieldy. --Mantanmoreland (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christianity project?
Talk:Spinal disc herniation/Archive 1

message: I, for one, would like to see a section discussing how slipped discs are repaired. -- 
Serge Issakov 23:52, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solutions? 

message: Why does herniated disc get linked to this page? Looking around and googling it seems like 'slipped disc' is just a laymans term for herniation, see http://jointinjuries.blogspot.com/2005/12/ooo-my-lower-back.html and http://www.spineuniverse.com/displayarticle.php/article28.html.
Unfortunately, I was researching herniation so I can't do a rewrite or edit... --220.245.180.134 12:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This article should be split to into several articles to show the various types of disc problems. --Durin 21:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herniated Disc 

message: Where does the image come from? Please email me your answer. See my User page for email. -- Fyslee 22:45, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is anatomically and pathologically misleading and should be removed. It provides a graphic illustration of a very loose expression that is imprecise and misleading. People get the idea that this can actually happen, and I have read chiropractic "patient education" brochures that actually used the expression "slipped disc" to get people to believe that chiropractors could push them back in place, which is nonsense. Discs can't "slip." Degenerated, torn, ripped, herniated, etc., but not slip. Although discs can't "slip," the contents (the nucleus pulposus, which isn't much) can get squeezed out like a little, soft "lump" of toothpaste from a tube. -- Fyslee 20:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: It's strange that the title of this article is "Slipped disc" when in the very first sentence the article states that this is a misleading misnomer.  Why not have "slipped disc" as a redirect to "prolapsed disc" and use the latter term as the title?  It's particularly unhelpful and non-encyclopedic to start off an article with an explanation of what the thing in question is *not*, yet this is necessitated by the choice of the popular misnomer as the very title of the article.  Before I change it, however, I'd be interested to know whether "splipped disc" is an index/heading term in medical texts. --Danward 18:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article 

message: Why are there no mentions of surgery on this page? --Bri 11:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surgery 

message: * Spinal disc herniation -- Fyslee 21:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New article to replace this one

message: Discuss the suggested merger here.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 23:01, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Spinal disc herniation/Archive 2

message: ==First comments: copyright problem?==
This page is wholly copypasted from a copyrighted text. Was permission given? Should this be here? Further, even if it should be, it currently has absolutely no links to anything anywhere else in Wikipedia, nor does it explain what a lumbar disc is (I came across this page looking for that, because I don’t know). As it stands, the page is of limited usefulness at best to anyone without some amount of prior knowledge.
There is also a page on Lumbar disc disease which also explains little, though at least some, besides also being better structured, so I can now guess from its content what a lumbar disc is.
Seems like there needs to be a Lumbar disc page to subsume the content of both Lumbar disc herniation and Lumbar disc disease which should redirect there. (I guess it would be in Category Anatomy or something?)
I’m not knowledgable enough in either the subject or the exact Wikipedia process (although I’ve dove plenty of refactoring on other wikis) to take this upon myself, hence this discussion instead of just doing it.
— Aristotle 21:05, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Contents from old "Lumbar disc herniation" article

message: This page is wholly copypasted from a copyrighted text. Was permission given? Should this be here? Further, even if it should be, it currently has absolutely no links to anything anywhere else in Wikipedia, nor does it explain what a lumbar disc is (I came across this page looking for that, because I don’t know). As it stands, the page is of limited usefulness at best to anyone without some amount of prior knowledge.
There is also a page on Lumbar disc disease which also explains little, though at least some, besides also being better structured, so I can now guess from its content what a lumbar disc is.
Seems like there needs to be a Lumbar disc page to subsume the content of both Lumbar disc herniation and Lumbar disc disease which should redirect there. (I guess it would be in Category Anatomy or something?)
I’m not knowledgable enough in either the subject or the exact Wikipedia process (although I’ve dove plenty of refactoring on other wikis) to take this upon myself, hence this discussion instead of just doing it.
— Aristotle 21:05, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: First comments: copyright problem?

message: Discuss the proposed merger here.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 23:01, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Major League Lacrosse

message: The article MLL Team Capsules is out of date, poorly maintained, and orphaned.  Perhaps it might get more attention if it was merged here.  Powers T 20:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Each individual team capsules appear (or should appear) on the individual team pages. Redirecting MLL Team Capsules to this page makes sense to me. -Mitico (talk) 14:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I don't care one way or the other,but would like to know how the MLL treats the Chicago Machine and the Ohio Machine. Does the MLL consider them one franchise two cities or two different franchise. any info or sources from the team or league would be great. Smith03 (talk) 20:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Chicago Machine and Ohio Machine

message: There has been an edit war going on for a few months now on the correct description for MLL. The reliable sources in favor of the "semi-pro" label include the 2013 Wall Street Journal story cited in the article, which describes the players as part time players with other jobs.  Merriam-Webster defines semi-pro as "paid to participate in a sport or activity but not doing it as a full-time job." That seems pretty clear cut that MLL is semi-pro. I am not aware of any independent secondary reliable sources provided by the editors who keep deleting the "semi-pro" description and the sourced salary info. Barryjjoyce (talk) 04:05, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, as one might guess since I've reverted similar edits before. On the other hand, I'm not so sure that the salary info needs to be in the first sentence, so long as it appears with the reliable source given somewhere in the article, to back up the semi-pro classification. Putting it right up frog seems a bit undue weight and argumentative. oknazevad (talk) 04:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: First discussion (2013)

message: I have reverted changes that were made without discussion here and without explanation in edit summaries. I removed the descriptor from the first sentence in the hope that will reduce edit warring, but left the descriptor in the second paragraph where more context is given (I.e., facts and cites re limited compensation and holding other jobs). CUA 27 (talk) 13:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: 2018

message: *Rochester 2001-08 -> Toronto 2009-10 -> Hamilton 2011-13 -> Florida 2014-current
*Chicago 2006-10 -> Rochester 2011-17 -> Dallas 2018-current
Not suggesting this be added but just posting this here for information  Newyearbaby (talk) 02:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Real franchise lines
Talk:Anne Sweeney

message: Thanks for the work here. -- AstroU (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A portait-picture always improves an article. -- AstroU (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A good article 

message: She was a bright light in a dismal world, it seems.
 Headline-1: ABC producer was 'murdered and sexually assaulted while on vacation in Belize'
* http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3402147/ABC-producer-murdered-sexually-assaulted-vacation-Belize.html
QUOTE: "Dogs tracked her scent on Thursday night but she was not found until the next morning.
Benque Viejo Police Superintendent Daniel Arzu said that Swaney's injured corpse was found floating on the river. She was wearing just a bra." -- AstroU (talk) 15:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The headline should say, "sexually assaulted and murdered" rather than the other way around. -- AstroU (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tragic death in Belize (so sad...) 
Talk:Anthony Ray Parker

message: Please take some time to read WP:BLPCRIME (especially the first sentence) and WP:BLPNAME (specifically the 2nd paragraph) before you read the rest of this section. I'll wait.
Done? Good. The information being added regarding his son Joseph is 1) irrelevant to an encyclopedic understanding of Mr. Parker, and 2) there has been no conviction, and given that the son is relatively unknown, typical editorial practice is to wait until some kind of conviction is secured.  Even if he had already been convicted of a crime, that information does not belong in this article, it belongs in an article about the scandal or about his son himself.
I have semi-protected the article to prevent re-insertion of the material under the authority of WP:BLPBAN. Editors who choose to edit this article, especially in relation to this particular material, should be aware that continuing to violate WP:BLP can lead to sanctions. —Darkwind (talk) 19:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  A police investigation into his son is notable enough to be mentioned in one sentence in his article. Given that it is huge international news, then it is not undue to involve one sentence. And it doesn't contravene any BLP rules to mention that there is a police investigation.Avaya1 (talk) 01:34, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is "huge international news", then there should be more than one RS mentioning this.  Otherwise this is a BLP violation. Two kinds of pork (talk) 02:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

text: I don't know whether or not it is appropriate to include the rape scandal his son has been embroiled in in New Zealand in this article. But some of the diminishing comments here are disturbing. let's not downplay the fact that this has been a major on-going scandal in New Zealand, making repeat headlines in all mainstream NZ news sources for several years now. It's been discussed in the national parliament and lead to debate and inquiries about rape culture and the way rape crimes are dealt with by the New Zealand Police. His son is a prominent figure in New Zealand as a result of this. 121.73.7.84 (talk) 06:43, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminal accusations against his son 
Talk:The Holy Mountain (1926 film)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Holy Mountain (1926 fillm). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 15:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Holy Mountain (1926 fillm)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Public domain in the united states, but under copyright in Germany until at least 2045. That is 70 years after the death of the last primary author, which also happens to be the director. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 17:45, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  public domain status
Talk:Dipleidoscope

message: The museum Galileo of Florence has a copy of a Dipleidoscope conceived by Giovanni Battista Amici. 
(http://catalogue.museogalileo.it/object/Dipleidoscope.html)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.220.2 (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another exemple of Dipleidoscope
Talk:List of football clubs in Italy

message: Is this article meant to be for a full list of clubs in Italy, or is it supposed to be the way it is right now? Bigdottawa 14:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  full list? 

message: I propose to redesign this article and organize it alphabetically rather than football divisions. For instance:
A
Name                   	Short name 	City                      	Current division	Home venue
U.C. AlbinoLeffe       	AlbinoLeffe	Albino and Leffe, Lombardy	Serie B         	Stadio Atleti Azzurri d'Italia
U.S. Alcamo Calcio 1928	Alcamo     	Alcamo, Sicily            	Eccellenza      	Stadio Lelio Catella
Atalanta B.C.          	Atalanta   	Bergamo, Lombardy         	Serie A         	Stadio Atleti Azzurri d'Italia
Ascoli Calcio 1898     	Ascoli     	Ascoli Piceno, Marche     	Serie A         	Stadio Cino e Lillo Del Duca
B
Name              	Short name	City                   	Current division	Home venue
A.S. Bari         	Bari      	Bari, Apulia           	Serie B         	Stadio San Nicola
A.S.D. Barletta   	Barletta  	Barletta, Apulia       	Serie D         	Stadio Cosimo Puttilli
A.S. Biellese 1902	Biellese  	Biella, Piedmont       	Serie C2        	Stadio Antonio Lamarmora
Bologna F.C. 1909 	Bologna   	Bologna, Emilia-Romagna	Serie B         	Stadio Renato Dall'Ara
Brescia Calcio    	Brescia   	Brescia, Lombardy      	Serie B         	Stadio Mario Rigamonti
Let me know your opinion. --Angelo 00:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change this article 

message: Accurate up to 2006/7?  That is terrible. john k (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Embarrassing
Talk:Antônio Carlos (footballer, born 1983)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved(closed by non-admin page mover)  Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 21:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Antônio Carlos (footballer) →  – avoid confusion with Antônio Carlos (footballer, born 1993) Joeykai (talk) 19:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 September 2020
Talk:Anuj Sharma

message: Articles should contain encyclopedic information and not contain excessive detail, particularly unsourced lists of music shows and performances. The external links needs to be trimmed down to just a couple; see WP:EL. Also, there is no reason to have a list of interviews because Wikipedia should not substitute for an official website. The pictures also need to be trimmed: perhaps only one should be retained. We do not normally have pictures with embedded and promotional wording. Johnuniq (talk) 03:19, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive detail 
Talk:Archie Brown (historian)

message: Would it be possible to change the designation page title from historian to political scientist as that is more accurate.  ThanksSofya2020 (talk) 11:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historian is inaccurate11:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[[User:Sofya2020|Sofya2020]] ([[User talk:Sofya2020|talk]])
Template talk:That '70s Show

message: Here's why I did those changes:
* The "character" link didn't lead to a main character page, but to some recurring characters. That didn't make sense. Instead, I removed it and added a "recurring character" entry in the list.
* The "notable episodes" didn't make sense. Sure, the pilot and finale are notable, but what about the others? What's so notable about them? I removed that and added an "episodes" link in the "other topics" section.
* Yellow is a colour very present in That 70s Show. Seems only fair it be used in the template.
Hope you like the changes. -- Ritchy 14:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  misc. changes 

message: I have removed "Point Place" form list because 
#that article is about Point Place, Ohio, and
#Point Place, Wisconsin, is a fictional town.
To whoever added it in the first place, please get your facts right first. HymylyT@C 17:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link removal 

message: That '70s Show
EamonnPKeane 20:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some changes suggested
Talk:Motion graphic design

message: @Aaron Liu pointed out a copyright issue in the "Types of Motion Graphics" section of this article. The contributor @Kasradesigner who added that info has the same username as the website which it came from, so it may have been an attempt at self-promotion.
Regardless of the copyright issue, it seems to me that the whole copyrighted portion should just be deleted, since it's just one person's opinions from their blog, but I'm not sure if anyone else might want to weigh in about this before deleting a huge chunk of content. Ekmz (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue: "Motion graphics trends" 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ZsinjTalk 01:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Barrington D. Parker Jr.

message: Interesting dissent in Wiley v. DRK photo (Decided: February 16, 2018, Docket No. 15‐1134). Mentioned in some secondary sources but not discussed at length, so I'm leaving it here in case someone writes about it in a way that tells us something about the subject of this article. Nemo 09:16, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright dissent
Talk:USS Essex (CV-9)

message: I've replaced this sentence in the WWII section, which seems to be a typo:
::"Her second amphibious assault delivered in company with TG 58.2 was against the fastest type of its class also used as a helicopter and harrier transport the Marshalls (29 January–2 February 1944)."
with this sentence:
::"Her second amphibious assault delivered in company with TG 58.2 was against the Marshalls (29 January–2 February 1944)."
which is from a previous revision. 
::Joconnor (talk) 20:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Is it just me, or does the infobox on this article seem excessively long?  It appears to be because of its extensive modifications and many honors and awards...  I'm not sure, but should this be condensed, possibly removing one set of modification info?  Just wondering. --Havocrazy 05:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I checked the other Essex class ship articles and none of them used the additional templates for the two conversions. In order to make the articles consistent I deleted the templates but put wikilinks to the two articles that discuss the conversions in detail in the category heading of the table. Also, at the risk of offending sailors and marines who served on the Essex, I updated the Awards and Honors sections to only the major Unit citations that had corresponding articles and removed the information that applied to eligibility for individual awards. There are other sources for that information and it seems appropriate to just include the unit awards for this article. Awotter (talk) 19:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: The flow and dates on the service history needs some work. It not very clear on a lot thing. I don't think it should start with a summary at the beginning of WWII, for example. The dates are not clear enough there is not year so how is a person coming here for information to know exactly when it happened? I will be working on this situation this week. Reb1981 (talk) 04:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service History 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:USS Essex (CV-9) - January 1960.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 31, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-12-31. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:USS Essex (CV-9) - January 1960.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Does anyone know why this ship did not become a museum ship?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 01:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum ship
Talk:Symphony No. 13 (Haydn)

message: Will fix the redirect later, but first.. that's a standard Gregorian chant fragment, not something peculiar to Mozart. Even Vincent d'Indy, who despised Mozart, used it.  Mozart also found it in symphonies by Michael Haydn ... Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to say "sound like" Baccherini (talk) 00:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Jupiter Symphony]]