lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kimberley, British Columbia

message: Article needs additional information. Is the mayor deceased? --BoomerAB (talk) 16:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where do you get the population number from? The official page of the town of Kimberley (see http://kimberley.iwebez.com/siteengine/activepage.asp?PageID=304) lists the population at 6139, citing the 2006 census as a source. So either the official page is outdated (which is quite possible), the number on Wikipedia is wrong, or the population has increased by 1/7th in 1 year. Which one is it and what is the correct population number? 132.230.86.103 (talk) 13:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: The redirect A good place to be has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 15:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:A good place to be]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:William Augustus Bootle

message: There is already article William A. Bootle! Berasategui 11:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/William Augustus Bootle was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Dynasties of ancient Egypt

message: I removed The Libu as a dynasty under the Third Intermediate Period. There is no such "dynasty". There are local rulers throughout most of the later part of the 3IP, some of them Libu, and some not. —Nefertum17 11:24, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How are the dynasties divided? Does the end of a dynasty signify the end of a family line? --Menchi 00:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynasty division 

message: This list does not mention the Ummayads, Abbasids, Turks, Mamluks, or the British Empire. Why not?
: The page is about the dynasties of the ancient civilization, not of the post-Roman period. For that reason, I have moved the page to be more specific. A. Parrot (talk) 22:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certain Dynasties are missing
Talk:Aérospatiale SA 321 Super Frelon

message: Sorry to bring the question again, but I am really puzzled about this; most articles I have seen on any vehicle tend to have tables, or get "infotablised". Besides, what would be the drawback of having a table, compared to the section/subsection system ? 
The table has qualities: it is more compact, presents both general informations and technical informations at the top of the page, and only uses a vertical space which is already taken by the main photograph. 
What are the inconvenients ? Rama 11:41, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I also tended to be in favour of the table format at first, but it creates difficulties in terms of formatting for different browsers and smaller screens as well as being a hassle each time the style of Wikipedia is changed. It is for this reason, as well as making it easier to edit, that the participants of the Aircraft WikiProject decided to adopt the present format (which is also similar to the standard used by Jane's). The discussion which led to the change can be seen here. Impi 13:05, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  pfff... I wish people could stop using crapy browsers :p In the absolute, I think it's quite clear that this is precisely the kind of data for which tables are designed; but well, if there's an implementation problem, I'll leave the matter to experts :p Thanks and cheers ! Rama 14:39, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table or not table ? 

message: one example of the many things hopefully someone can add in. Why I tagged this. I'm sure most RS on this subject are in french, so i hope there are some bi-linguals out there lol. 72.0.180.2 (talk) 08:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does say how many engines it has - it's in the Specifications section if you can't wait for someone to add it in the main text. lol - BillCJ (talk) 09:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: how many engines etc etc
Talk:CortiSlim

message: This page was proposed for deletion January 2005.  The discussion is archived at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cortislim.  Joyous 11:49, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
Article needs content on how this product could not possibly be effective.  The manufacturer's claim that Cortisol causes excess belly fat is so extremely ridiculous that really these commercials need to be taken off the air. — Stevie is the man! Talk | Contrib 11:23, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: PROD

message: This page should be marked for deletion.  I understand there was already a vote, but this page does not offer any useful information.  It is basically an advertisement, that sounds like it was written by an Ad executive.  It cites no sources and has no medical information.  The people that voted to keep it are probably all from their company.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darktangent (talk • contribs) 23:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark for deletion 

message: This edit:
(cur | prev) 22:45, 1 October 2014‎ ASporn (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (2,186 bytes) (-579)‎ . . (corrected FTC fine information and Cortislim 
deleted sourced information and reduced the impact of the only notability of this topic, which seems to be the demise of Window Rock by bankruptcy caused by the FTC ruling and fines over false advertising.  In the meantime, I made a few edits.  I propose to return the article to the version prior to ASporn's edit. This edit was ASporn's only contribution to Wikipedia.  If there is consensus for this, is there an automatic way to do this or do I do it manually?  Thanks, Desoto10 (talk) 04:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert to older version?
Talk:Survivor: Vanuatu

message: There is a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Survivor task force#Jury vote tables to list the vote totals in the same order as the names in the finalist row immediately above the vote totals. All interested editors are invited to join that discussion.  Since the Survivor task force appears to be inactive, I'm notifying Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Reality television task force and the talk pages for each Survivor season in order to reach interested editors.  Schazjmd (talk) 16:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivor jury vote table discussion 

message: The redirect Lee Masters has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 06:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Lee Masters]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Raffles Institution

message: But not a complete merge. I propose taking the content from both Raffles Institution (Secondary) and Raffles Institution (Junior College) and rehashing into two new articles, namely:
* Raffles Institution, which will talk about the present situation, the combined institution, but of course with a small section on history, and;
* Raffles Junior College, which will mainly be a (short) historical article talking about the JC that existed from 1982-2008.
This is somewhat similar to the relationship between the Hwa Chong Institution, The Chinese High School, and Hwa Chong Junior College articles. Any comments/suggestions/volunteers? - b3virq3b (talk) 13:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to merge? 

message: Why only these two CCAs and not the others? I didn't think these two are somehow representative of all our CCAs. Unless we can provide wider coverage for BB, NCC, NPCC, and also other ccas, I'm moving them here. Makes no sense. Overmage (talk) 03:10, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scout Groups / Raffles Debaters archived here 

message: I think that the Gap Semester program should be added in to this page, especially as the Year 1,2, and 3 orientiation programs are included in the wiki as well - I feel like it would be inappropriate if we exclude Gap Semester from the list but include orientation programs. More info at http://www.ri.edu.sg/main/gapsemester and www.gapsemester.ri.edu.sg Driller19 (talk) 13:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gap Semester 

message: Hi all! an edit is ongoing to distinguish out Raffles Junior College (a former Institution that is under different administration), from its counterpart Raffles Institution. Since the article Raffles Institution already covered both the High School and the College sections, letting Raffles Junior College to remain in status quo will only overlap and mislead readers on the whole topic. It is more appropriate to independently present the existence of the former RJC, which functioned as a Government-aided JC with separate administration before 2009, as a piece of history. This is based on the consensus reflected at the section "Time to merge?".
Also, to better link up the history of RI, I will be dedicating a section for RJC (to show the history of RI's college section), and insert a link to this full article for RJC.
Will appreciate for any forms of support to help to sort out the history of RI and RJC, and to present their heritage in a more reader-friendly manner. Lyg 2001 (talk) 13:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to "History" Section to support cleanup for [[Raffles Junior College]] article
Talk:Jedi census phenomenon

message: Article states that "It is unknown whether the numbers have continued to fall as the 2011 census was not completed due to an earthquake in Christchurch". I guessing this is out of date now as a census was done in 2013. Anyone know how to get this information so the page can be updated?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.97.161.47 (talk) 03:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Zealand Jedi
Talk:Universal Carrier

message: Please elaborate on why this is incorrectly called this.  Bren Gun Carrier redirects to this page and there is no other page for Bren Gun Carrier.  Thanks.24.36.79.200 (talk) 01:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Pre-war there were several different carriers; MG (from which the others were developed), Cavalry, Bren, Scout and AOP, which were manufactured with slight differences depending on the role. The Universal carrier was designed as a single vehicle to replace all the earlier types. The Universal Carrier could be used specifically to carry a Bren gun and its team but could also be used for other purposes and could still carry a Bren gun). A Bren Carrier was designed specifically to carry a Bren gun and because this was its designed purpose using it for other roles was not always possible. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 02:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Incorrectly referred to as the Bren Cun Carrier

message: The article needs expansion in the "Combat use" section, and it also needs a section listing the main "Users" (pre, during, and post-war) which are surely a lot. Can anyone please help suggesting verifiable sources that can be used for this? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a number of sources given in the References section, they probably have the information. Starting with the Osprey book. GraemeLeggett (talk) 05:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I don't have access to the books listed, will check the online ones. Regards, DPdH (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

text: Thanks for helping with the article improvement! Regards, DPdH (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Profile No. 14 "Carriers" by Peter Chamberlain and Duncan Crow in the AFV Profile series from Profile Publications is an old (c 1968) but useful source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.172.230 (talk) 21:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

text:  ... Never mind, I've just seen it mentioned in an earlier section above.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.172.230 (talk) 21:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion needed - any suggested sources? 

message: The infobox says the weight is:
* 3 ton 16 cwt (3.75 t) laden
* 3 ton 5 cwt (3.19 t) unladen
The conversion to metric tons is incorrect. Assuming imperial "long" hundredweight,  gives: 
* 3 ton 16 cwt () laden
* 3 ton 5 cwt () unladen
If I guess the source was American and used short tons, the result is even worse: 
* 3 ton 16 cwt () laden
* 3 ton 5 cwt () unladen
I don't have access to the source for these figures. Does it really have these incorrect values of metric tons? Hairy Dude (talk) 14:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Being that the source is dated 1970 only the imperial figures are given. These seem to be taken from vehicle handbooks or something else official from the 40's which did not generally have metric conversions. So just unladen 3t 5cwt and laden 3t 16cwt figures are present. Ways (talk) 08:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Weight
Talk:Bachelorette party

message: Thoroughly well written description of a hens party :) Xxl The Club (talk) 04:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great article 

message: clothed females, naked male Party
: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=CFNM%20party
: https://metro.co.uk/2018/07/19/like-inside-cfnm-clothed-female-naked-male-fetish-parties-7733916/
... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 00:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFNM Party 

message: Nowadays this term is often used instead of 'bachelorette party' and 'bridal shower' 202.164.137.57 (talk) 07:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a link to a reliable source describing the "bridal bash" usage. Cullen328 (talk) 07:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridal bash
Talk:Iraq Liberation Act

message: First I must admit that I am new to Wikipedia and hope that my contributions will be acceptable.  I read the article and noted major issues with the clarity of the writing and attempted to fix these issues in a rewrite.  I also added several other points, including the fact that the Act had been referenced in the Authorization for the current Iraqi War.  I attempted to maintain NPOV throughout, but I ask that you double check this, as I must admit that i am not a strong supporter of the War.  I am however an Law Professor and can read statutes.  I did attempt to maintain as much of the original text and focus as possible, seeking only to provide clarity and updated information.  As this was my first major edit, I ask that you respond with constructive comments.
Franklin Moore 06:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit of the Page

message: Rendering aid to groups within Iraq with democratic aspirations, is only an attack on Saddam's sovereignty if one assumes he would not win free elections, and even then technically the coup de grace would be committed by internal elements.  Surely, there is plenty of precedent for this kind of meddling in the affairs of other nations given the nature of the long cold war.  Perhaps, the trials of previous violators will provide legal precedents.  Someone should research the trial of China in the Korean conflict, N. Vietnam in the Vietnam conflict, Saudia Arabia in the Afghan conflict, etc.--Silverback 17:25, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technically, wouldn't it be the prodemocratic groups within Iraq that are doing the overthrowing? 

message: I added the weasel words warning due to the statement "Others have argued...".  Additionally the argument following those words is factually incorrect (the act does not prohibit military action; it just explicitly neglects to authorize it) which increases the need for a citation on that point.
I have noted your questions and have found several citations which I think will clarify the issue you raise.  Due to time constaints, I will not be able to draft those today, but will do so tomorrow and submit them.   As  a final note please sign all posts.  Thanks  Franklin Moore 17:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel Words 

message: This article takes a flagrant pro-American side, and could be argued, even pro-Bush side despite the many controversies and problems with the legislation, the facts it asserts, and other points of view.
:What do you mean "pro-Bush?"
:This law was enacted while William Jefferson Clinton was POTUS. Ruthfulbarbarity 19:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The article by Jeffrey Sachs that was quoted is not a reasonable source; it is a partisan diatribe with the goal of discrediting the Clintons. For example, it fails to note that the act passed the senate by unanimous consent, and the house by a vote of 360-36, including Bernie Sanders.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgolden (talk • contribs) 23:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Sachs Article
Talk:Yelabuga

message: you should have added that Yelabuga was not only the place of birth of Ivan Shishkin, but also Marina Tsvetaeva's the last place of living. She spent there the last years of her life and hanged herself there.
She did not spend there "the last years" - just the last week. But But, of cause, the first association with the name "elabuga" - "the damned place that killed Tsvetaeva"140.247.103.166 12:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Paprika

message: This page shows up on 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_errors:_access-date_without_URL
and shouldn't. Quebec99 (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Positive 

message: production today is lead by India? Jigglywiggley (talk) 01:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article could use improvement
Talk:Meridiani Planum

message: Should this article be listed in :Category:Albedo features on Mars?  I don't know enough about Meridiani Planum to determine if it's considered an albedo feature.  We have special categories for craters of Mars and hills of Mars, but this fits in neither of those.  Perhaps we should make a category called Topography of Mars, or whatever the fitting name is.  Any suggestions?  —Brim 15:07, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
:No.  The historical albedo feature is Sinus Meridiani.  When space probes explored Mars and we finally got clear pictures of what was on its surface, a lot of surface features received names inspired by the geographically (or "areo"graphically) nearby albedo feature names.
:There is currently a clumsily named parent category :Category:Surface feature nomenclature of solar system bodies.  Based on established practice, you could create a List of geological features on Mars page, which would have sections for each type of feature, except the mountain and crater sections would just be links to List of mountains on Mars and List of craters on Mars.  Actually, based on http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/mare/mareTOC.html , there's a big list of "plana" and most other features, so List of geological features on Mars page would probably just be a link page.
:Here's a useful list of Latin plurals: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/jsp/append5.jsp
:So if you wanted to create a page like List of plana on Mars and :Category:Plana on Mars (similar to the existing pages for craters), you have your work cut out for you.
:-- Curps 20:44, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Albedo features on Mars
Talk:Tehri Dam

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 

message: Voice details explain 106.206.202.112 (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tehri dam 

message: Details of the dam 103.139.243.39 (talk) 15:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tehri dam
Talk:Quantum nonlocality

message: To my untrained eye, the first paragraph in the History section seems to leave out a crucial condition for EPR's reasoning: the specific quantum description displayed in the equation applies to entangled particles, doesn't it? Any old collection of objects can't be described by the wave function stated, if there is no entanglement, right? But that's not mentioned (even though most people reading the text supposedly already know that). Wdanbae (talk) 10:16, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That equation refers to one specific entangled state. It's not supposed to represent all quantum states, not even all entangled ones. Tercer (talk) 15:30, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can the first history paragraph be considered complete? 

message: To further elaborate on the reasons behind this edit: the removed text is based on primary sources making novel claims, and quite recent ones at that. It is also unclear about what the sources are actually claiming (an earlier revision was flat-out incorrect). Moreover, it goes about adding to the article in the wrong way, jamming blurbs about new papers into the intro rather than setting them in their proper conceptual context, as determined by secondary/tertiary sources, and then adding a summary to the intro if the article organization warrants it. (Physical Review A has published 50 papers talking about "contextuality" in the past year, and 138 since the beginning of 2020. It's not our job to write about them all.) Wikipedia already has more than enough disjointed bits of hype scattered through its science articles; we don't need more. XOR'easter (talk) 19:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal 

message: It looks like Wikipedia no longer has an article on "local realism."  Should that language in this article be reworded? Yoderj (talk) 15:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Local realism exists and redirects to Principle_of_locality#Quantum_mechanics. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Local Realism"
Talk:Vegelate

message: I believe the compromise name adopted for this style of chocolate was "family chocolate".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/the_economy/381999.stm 
--Amortize 16:12, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, at least not in Britain; for example, Dairy Milk chocolate, in the UK at least, is still just "milk chocolate": the word "family" does not appear on the packaging. 86.132.136.234 05:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

message: As can be read about at http://www.typetive.com/candyblog/item/keep_it_real_raffle
and commented on at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/oc/dockets/comments/getDocketInfo.cfm?EC_DOCUMENT_ID=1477&SORT=DOCKET_NOD&MAXROWS=15&START=1&CID=&AGENCY=FDA
The FDA is considering removing limits on fats used to create "chocolate". --Nog lorp 05:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential FDA rules change 

message: If I were being honest, I can't say for sure whether vegelate actually needs its own article.  But even a cursory Google search reveals that the term, at least at one time, had enough relevance to be mentioned in news articles and more than one non-Wikimedia dictionary including Oxford's.  I don't know whether the right choice is to delete it, merge it, expand it or leave it as-is, but I don't think any hasty unilateral decision is appropriate, and the article at least merits a proper articles-for-deletion review. - Gilgamesh (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputing proposed deletion