Talk:Party of the Democratic Revolution

message: Some examples of their politics would be most welcome. Unfortunately I don't read spanish. 84.48.194.162 23:02, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Policies? 

message: I feel it is not neutral to say that Felipe Calderón made claims to victory, when López Obrador did the same thing. I feel it shows Calderón in a pretty bad way, and anyways Calderón shouldn't even be in this page since he is a candidate from another party. El Oso 23:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Felipe Calderón 

message: I think the video scandals shouldn't have place at this page because other parties have also been involved in other corruption circumstances (and even worse than this) which are not mentioned on their pages. To be objective, the information on every party should be equal, which means that some specific information should be included or not, but not only on one side and not on the other. In case it is included, this should also be in a complete version and not only containing half of the truth, because objectivety is lost. Aldera 01:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video scandals 

message: Michaelas10, please note that I have restored the PRD page to its version before the recent changes.  Please note that the editor also attempted to make the same changes on the Felipe Calderon page, but the changes were (not by me) reversed.  In restoring this page, please consider whether a 2006 Presidential Election section is even appropriate.  The PAN (Conservative Party) page does not include it.  Would it be appropriate to begin one?  I'd rather not see one, on either the PRD entry, or the PAN entry.
[[[User:69.211.11.21|69.211.11.21]] 13:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: :Image:Partido de la Revolucion Democratica.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Partido de la Revolucion Democratica.gif

message: :Image:Partido de la Revolucion Democratica.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Partido de la Revolucion Democratica.gif

message: The History section mentions that the Frente Democrático Nacional's candidate, Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas won the 1988 Federal Election.  While this is a common belief in Mexico, the source of the information is not well documented, and so, displaying these events in such a way could result in an argumentative, biased article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.76.167.33 (talk) 15:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: In the 2006 legislative elections the party won out of 500 seats in the Chamber of Deputies and out of 128 Senators.
Someone familiar with Mexican politics, please fill in the #
--Homoaffectional (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seats out of total gained in 2006 elections; #s missing 

message: Does it really make sense to identify the ideology of the PRD as both Social democracy and Marxism when they both completely contradict each other? I'd say the party leans closest to Democratic Socialism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.243.169.31 (talk) 19:29, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social democracy & Marxism 

message: Hello, PRD's official ideology is not marxism, is socialdemocracy. I'll edit it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.135.190.12 (talk) 21:38, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  PRD is a social democratic party, not a marxist party 

message: Hello, I am working on this article for a class assignment, the banner of which I have added to this talk page. I will address some of the problems that have been pointed out such as the limited view of the history of the PRD. I would like to divide the history into a chronological order which would include how the party was founded. I would also like to integrate the controversies into the history section since as many have pointed out, it having its own section does not provide a complete and unbiased view to the political party. I would also add a section on ideology
I would also like to add a section on the current structure and composition of the political party. The section on current structure and composition would include information on the separate factions of the PRD as well as how the president, secretary, and other positions are chosen. 
Another section that I would be interested in adding would be policy positions. The information I have found so far is based on the state. So, I would appreciate any information on the policy positions of the entire party instead of just one candidate or one state.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts on how to edit this article!
Nnlpz (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed edits

message: Your expanded contribution improve your article since your initial contribution. I enjoyed reading your article and I believe that any general audience would be able to understand your topic. I could not find any major spelling or typo errors in your new text except the “Which” sentences that need something at the beginning of the sentence to form a complete sentence.  For your final contribution, I think you can post more links on other articles to direct more traffic to your page and add to the “see also” page. I think adding content on the achievements of the party and the reforms it has brought to Mexico would be helpful as well. Pictures would also help to make the article more aesthetically pleasing and can potentially aid in visualizing various concepts. Overall, great job!
Dwang41 (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of Article PJHC 

message: Your expanded contribution to this article really improved the comprehensiveness of the article. I liked that you included vital sections, such as “Principles” and “Internal Organizations” that described very important characteristics of the Party of the Democratic Revolution. There were a few grammatical errors in terms of incomplete sentences throughout the text but I liked that you used bullet points to make the principles section really concise and easy to read. Your formatting, readability, and neutrality were all in line with Wikipedia guidelines. In addition, your use of tables to visually represent the information was extremely successful. Overall, I would recommend expanding on the political climate in the history section in order to provide more context to the decades of PRD rise to power. Great job and keep up the good work! Aaie21 (talk) 18:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review Comments

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Party of the Democratic Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100109163113/http://www.ife.org.mx/documentos/Estadisticas2006/presidente/nac.html to http://www.ife.org.mx/documentos/Estadisticas2006/presidente/nac.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: what are the current political positions of this party? the party's article isn't updated 
141.226.13.116 (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) position?  

message: — Assignment last updated by Jlbettis (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Modern Mexico