Talk:VistA

message: This article in general reads like an advertisement for VistA ("highest user satisfaction"), etc. This is laughable as anyone who uses it knows the interface is from the 1980s and it is incredibly frustrating in comparison to more modern EHRs.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:240:D300:650:7964:FEEB:3E98:96C4 (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of article

message: I have commented out the paragraph contributed by 70.108.148.50. Although it provides some information, the content isn't clear ("The first Hardhats were the developers of DHCP, called that because they felt like they were working on an "Underground Railroad"--huh?), contextual ("Some people have suggested that the VA could become the nucleus of a United States national health care system."--because of VistA?, why?), referenced, or neutral("become one of the premier health providers in the world despite being grossly underfunded by Congress"). Some claims are speculative ("The support Congressman Montgomery provided to the VA has been greatly missed.") and really don't provide the reader with any explanation--has funding been reduced? Is VistA being displaced by other software? The paragraph needs to be rewritten with Wikipedia guidelines in mind, and the goal of providing information, not an opinion or a memorial. Ryanjo 02:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: VistA history

message: I'm wondering if this page should be split between the VistA the VA uses and the ones being used outside.  While there's lots of good information here, I'm left with the impression that the VA is using the same software as the public distributions.  I believe this is not really the case.  The VA develops VistA for their own use, makes available a copy of the source code under Freedom of Information Act, that others then use for their own purposes.  The references to GT.M and distribution discussions should clarify that the source flows from the VA one-way, and others have added other things and distribute for their purposes.
Also, VistA Office/EHR is a government sanctioned distribution - not mentioned or linked.
Lyle 22:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I have created an article for WorldVistA, which is the public version (originally called VistA Office/EHR). Perspectoff (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixing VistA with More Public VistA

message: Should some mention of the DoD and VA joint electronic health record system (iEHR) be made?  It has been ongoing for a little while now, and is a non-trivial effort which involves (threatens? includes? expands? evolves?) VistA.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.1.89 (talk) 08:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: iEHR?

message: An image used in this article, File:IOS VistA.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:IOS VistA.png)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:IOS VistA.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:ICPRS iPhone.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:ICPRS iPhone.png)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:ICPRS iPhone.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: VA hospitals are not listed on HIMMS Stage 7 Hospital List (link on Footnote 12). Is this accurate? Also, there are at least 106 hospitals with googling news reports on hospitals awarded Stage 7.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.48.20.27 (talk) 02:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  HIMMS Stage 7 

message: https://connectedcare.va.gov/VistA.asp is 404ing. :(.
This is referenced in the article, but I want to keep it in there until a better link is provided. I have emailed ConnectedCare. I encourage you to do so as well: https://connectedcare.va.gov/
- Matthew  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exception e (talk • contribs) 23:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main VistA Website Gives a 404 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on VistA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091024045131/http://www1.va.gov/vadodhealthitsharing/page.cfm?pg=9 to http://www1.va.gov/vadodhealthitsharing/page.cfm?pg=9
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified