lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Charles F. Johnson

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Charles Fletcher Johnson was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 01:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: Regarding the move of this page, Charles Johnson (70%) and Charles F. Johnson (26%) are the only iterations of Johnson's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com in Maine from 1910 to 1930. While Charles Johnson (Maine politician) would work, his initial serves a natural disambiguator. Star Garnet (talk) 20:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Charles Foster (Ohio politician)

message: I notice that from 1892 to 1893, two members of Benjamin Harrison's cabinet (Secretary of State John Foster and Secretary of the Treasury Charles Foster) shared the same surname. Are there any other examples of this? john k (talk) 04:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting fact 

message: I wonder if the naming of the main character in the movie Citizen Kane, "Charles Foster Kane", was meant as a reference to this specific politician. Though granted by the time the movie was made it would have been 50-60 years since he had been involved in politics, but still an interesting factoid. MightyArms (talk) 19:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citizen Kane
Talk:Charles H. Bell (politician)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.images-of-new-hampshire-history.com/On-This-Day-in-New-Hampshire-History.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Asartea Talk | Contribs 13:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Charles H. Burke

message: This article first states that Burke served as CIA to 1929 and later that Hubert Work replaced him in 1923.
The list of Commissioners and Ass't Sec'ies in the article on the BIA also says that Burke stayed in office until 1929.
Arrell Gibson, in his scholarly work "The American Indian," does say that Work succeeded Burke, though he does not say when.
Perhaps those closer to the subject matter can clear this up.
Terry J. Carter (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Hubert Work? 
Talk:Charles Herbert Mackintosh

message: I changed the quality rating on this article from 'B' to class=start today.  There are not nearly enough inline citations in it to meet a B rating, and there are several redlinks that should be reviewed, fixed and/or unlinked.  PKT(alk) 13:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality rating
Talk:Sheep (disambiguation)

message: *23678 :Sheep (redirects to Domestic sheep)
*42605 Domestic sheep (has a hatnote to Sheep (disambiguation))
*754 Sheep (disambiguation) (only incoming article link is Domestic sheep)
According to this external tool, in August 2010 alone 42605 - 23678 = 18927 or 44% of page views on Domestic sheep came by some means other than the redirect from :Sheep.  And 754 / 42605 = 1.8% of those viewers linked out to the disambiguation page.  69.3.72.249 (talk) 21:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2010
Talk:Charles H. O'Neill

message: User:Richard_Arthur_Norton_(1958-_), I see that you added that the birth date was on 1880 on this edit (and has been on the article for over 11 years), why? It's impossible, since he was first elected as mayor in 1868. Uwsi (talk) 01:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date
Talk:Charles Sumner Hamlin

message: ¶  I hesitated to insert this on my own initiative because it seems to be accepted here and elsewhere that Charles S. Hamlin was the first "Chairman" of the Federal Reserve Board, but the First Annual Report of the Federal Reserve Board (for the period ending Dec. 31, 1914, published GPO, 1915) identifies, on page 23, William Gibbs McAdoo, Sec. of the Treasury as the Chairman, and Charles S. Hamlin as the "Governor". 
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044105545214;view=1up;seq=29
I feel this is significant enough that someone with better credentials than mine ought to verify and possibly clarify this matter. Sussmanbern (talk) 15:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in the Federal Reserve
Talk:Charles H. Dietrich

message: Regarding the move of this page, C. H. Dietrich (45%), Charles H. Dietrich (35%), and Charles Dietrich (19%) are the only iterations of Dietrich's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com in Nebraska. Per WP:INITS, a written-out name is preferable to simply initials if the written-out version is used by RS. Star Garnet (talk) 20:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Charles Hiram Randall

message: totals from 1912 to 1918 are from the CQ Voting and Elections collection, totals from 1920 onwards are here. --RobbieFal 00:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update notes 

message: I added an infobox to this article but it was removed. Everyone please announce your opinions on supporting or opposing an infobox for the article.
Support I support the infobox because it is a convenient location for a lot of information. Also almost every other congressman page on Wikipedia has an infobox with the exceptions being old congressmen whose articles are still stubs. For a matter of consistency to other articles. I feel it should be added. --Jamo58 (talk) 06:17, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Charles J. Folger

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:FOLGER, Charles J-Treasury (BEP engraved portrait).jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 16, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-04-16. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:FOLGER, Charles J-Treasury (BEP engraved portrait).jpg scheduled for POTD
Talk:Steve Coy

message: I'm guessing the guy with black hair is Steve Coy in the 03 version of the song, and the blondie is Pete (And so are the other two) but I'm afraid I'm wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.193.56.207 (talk) 02:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 

message: A banned editor, User:Jake Picasso, has persisted in recreating and adding nonsense to this bio. I've redirected and protected the page; he's not notable outside the band. Fences&Windows 20:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected
Talk:Charles Kerruish

message: I have removed the "controversies" section from the page. The information was without reference and so was unverifiable. A version of the same information had appeared on the page earlier (in a poorly-written form) and the edit was undone at that time by another editor. The person behind the recent edit (92.39.194.14) is encouraged to reinstate the information, but it needs be done so with a reference - a newspaper article, or a book reference would be appropriate. (The removed section can be found through the 'View History' tab). Manx James (talk) 15:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the "Controversies" section
Talk:Steve Evans (footballer, born 1979)

message: The years "2006/2007" and "2007/2008" in the section "References" in this page appear, on my computer screen, ar least, as Skype numbers. Can this be changed. Is it something to do with the way the information has been inserted into this Wikipeadia page or is it peculiar to my computer?Barmispain (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years appear as Skype telephone numbers in References section
Talk:Charles Magill

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Charles Magill was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 14:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Steve Foley (Coach)

message: I was looking at merging this article with Steve Foley (coach) which is an almost identical article. Then noticed a problem with this article quoting a recent death date to the person and still having a category of living people. The other article does not mention a death date. Curiously this article was created on the date of death specified but no other evidence indicates his death.
Does anyone know if this person has recently died and can confirm the date of death?
128.87.251.170 12:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status Conflict
Talk:Symplectic filling

message: Hi Orthografer, thanks for drawing my attention to your article.  I was wondering why you decided to call it "filling".  In my limited experience, and from the list of fillings you give in the article, it seems that everything is either in the complex category (Stein) or in the symplectic/almost-complex one (Weinstein, strong/weakly symplectically fillable etc.)  So perhaps something less general might be more interesting?  I'd love to hear your thoughts on the matter.  Best, SammyBoy 03:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalizations 

message: Though the definition for the different fillings of a contact manifold vary between authors I think the condition for beeing a weak filling should be slightly different. As far as I know the condition you impose on a weak filling is usually denoted by saying that the filling dominates the contact structure. The condition on a weak filling yousually is given by \omega^{n-1}|_\xi>0 if the filling has dimension 2n. 
For n=2 this is the same condition as before, whereas for n>2 the condition that the filling dominates the contact structure is equivalent to beeing a strong filling.
In this formulation the condition to be a weak filling is equivalent to the existence of a vector field Y transverse to the boundary M of the filling which induces the contact structure, i.e. i_Y\omega|_{TM} is a contact form for the contact structure on the boundary. Whether Y points inwards or outwards depends on whether the filling is a convex filling of a concave filling.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doenermaster (talk • contribs) 00:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  weak filling and dominating filling 

message: One should mention that there are two directions for fillings of contact manifolds; 
convex filling, which are symplectic cobordisms from \emptyset to M, and concave fillings (also called caps), which are symplectic cobordisms \bar{M} to \emptyset. Here \bar{M} is M with the reversed (contact) orientation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doenermaster (talk • contribs) 00:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  concave and convex fillings 

message: Why refer to cobordism? By definition, a filling of (smooth, boundaryless, possibly non-compact?) M seems to be another smooth manifold N such that \partial N=M, while a cobordism between two compact manifolds M1 and M2 is a third compact manifold N with \partial N= M_1 \sqcup M_2. These conventions make these two articles incompatible, and I don't see what is the benefit of defining a filling as a cobordism which is not quite a cobordism.
Another question is that are only compact manifolds really considered as a subject of filling manifolds? I can see at least one important yet perhaps quite trivial family of non-compact examples, namely the cotangent bundles of non-compact manifolds M with strongly convex Hamiltonian fúnctions h:T*M→R, where the canonical 1-form θ is a contact form on
: \{ h=c \} := \{ (x,p)\in T^*M \ | \ h(x,p)=c \}
and 
: \{ h \leq c \} := \{ (x,p)\in T^*M \ | \ h(x,p)\leq c \}
is its symplectic filling with dθ. Lapasotka (talk) 13:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cobordism?
Talk:Steve Foley (linebacker)

message: ==Untitled==
Is there any update on the case, I have searched the news archives, but I can't determine where the lawsuit stands, or what Gaut was sentenced to. Fsu23phd 16:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: So what has happened?

message: Is there any update on the case, I have searched the news archives, but I can't determine where the lawsuit stands, or what Gaut was sentenced to. Fsu23phd 16:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Steve Franks

message: When Psych debuted, Steve Franks did interviews with TV Guide in which he said the show was inspired by his father's real-life drilling him in observation. I can't access that magazine online, but I wonder if someone else might have the clipping so we could cite it. The same fact, although not the article, might be somewhere on USA's site. Lawikitejana (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dad + basis for ''Psych''? 

message: Hi, the biography in this article seems to be an exact copy of the imdb entry. --Zesel (talk) 19:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from imdb.com?
Talk:Charles Moore, 1st Marquess of Drogheda

message: At present the article cites Heathcote in stating that Moore was commissioned as a cornet into the 12th Light Dragoons in 1755. This seems unlikely given that he joined the Army in 1744 (the original DNB gives a date of 18 November 1755, but this is corrected in the ODNB) and became a lieutenant-colonel in January 1755. Twenty-five would have been pretty elderly for a cornet in the 18th century. I didn't like to remove the statement altogether as the ODNB doesn't give his first regiment. Opera hat (talk) 12:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: now corrected. Dormskirk (talk) 23:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of first commission
Talk:Rondel dagger

message: "Daggers may also have been thrown at unseated enemy knights to force them to engage in battle, though a mace was perhaps better suited to this task."  Can this sentence be clarified?  I don't actually know what it means to force someone to engage in battle, or why this weapon would be thrown. Boris B (talk) 03:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrown rondel? 

message: The introduction seems copied verbatim from http://www.aemma.org/index2.php?pg=t0 - or perhaps it is vice versa, can't be sure. H3Xh3X (talk) 20:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: Can anyone explain if theres a significant, scholarly difference between these 2 weapons? If there isn't the 2 pages should be merged? Misericorde is a stub Khitrir (talk) 11:15, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Misericorde]]
Talk:Steve Hanft

message: The lede is too long - it should summarize the article, not be the bulk of it. Move most of that text out of the lead into the article body. External links should not be in the article at all, except either included in a reference citation or in a separate external links section. Please do not blindly remove tags when the work needed to be done hasn't been done. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And note that the links in the tags explain these items. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag explanaitons
Talk:Charles Navarro

message: This article has been edited in accordance with the above. 01:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Style guidelines for biographies of California public officials]] 
Talk:Banguingui, Sulu

message: This paragraph was in the article:
:The Municipality of Tongkil now is known as Banguingui Municipality. The Mayor, Hadji Abdulwahid O. Sahidulla thought of changing it from Tongkil to Banguingui in honor of the dominant Banguingui tribe who lives in the then Tongkil Municipality. The renaming took place in Barangay Poblacion Luuk sometime January 29, 2006 and graced by prominent personalities like Former Governor Margarita "Ting Ting" delos Reyes-Cojuangco, Datu Zahir M. Mamalinta, son of the then PNP Regional Director of ARMM Police SSupt. Akmad Mangelen-Mamalinta, ARMM Chief of Staff Ulama Acad, and some Generals of the AFP.
I couldn't find any internet sources to back this up, and there are only a few sources that refer to "Banguingui, formerly Tongkil". The NSCB, which is probably the authority on this, still calls the town Tongkil. I'm going to leave in a line saying the municipality was renamed, but I'll give it a "citation needed" tag. --Coffee 03:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Potassium perchlorate

message: I think the external link to the page on making flash powder should be removed. Not only is flash powder illegal, the guide is dangerously inaccurate and vague. No one should be making 100g of flash powder, its enough to take off your hand!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zilali (talk • contribs) 20:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link to Pyro Wiki 

message: Since when did potassium form covalent compounds?
The whole ClO4- has a charge of 1- over the whole of it, and K+ sits next to it.
I agree, the picture should be a salt, as for Potassium Chlorate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.150.214.208 (talk) 05:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture of the structure of KClO<sub>4</sub> 

message: Is melting point really higher than boiling point???? 84.49.197.41 14:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melting and boiling points 

message: There are two different water solubilities mentioned in the article, one in the text and one in the infobox.  Neither is referenced.  --Ed (Edgar181) 13:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solubility 

message: In the scifi television series "The Expanse", season 1, episode 1, at 22:12, the new XO starts a night shift in the pilot's seat of an asteroid mining spacecraft by scraping off the red material at the tip of a wooden match and adding it to his coffee. Could this be Potassium Perchlorate 1) to reduce uptake of radioactive elements in their drinking water 2) sugar to sweeten/flavor the coffee (which the character remarked was horrible immediately previously) 3) as a stimulant? 4) haleucenagenic? (he reviews a distress signal and hears voices in the background)
Hobsonlane (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Fiction
Talk:Charles Powlett, 3rd Duke of Bolton

message: I think I remember from The Complete Peerage that the eldest sons of the Dukes of Bolton were styled "Lord St John" and not by their fathers' higher titles. Can anyone with access confirm this? Opera hat (talk) 14:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation for style as Lord Winchester after 1699 but still none for Lord Wiltshire. Opera hat (talk) 01:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to TCP, the 2nd Duke used the title of Earl of Wiltshire while heir to the Marquessate of Winchester (before the creation of the Dukedom), but I can't find a cite for the 3rd Duke's use of the title as heir apparent to the heir apparent. Choess (talk) 02:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Courtesy titles
Talk:C. R. Swart

message: See https://af.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Robberts_Swart
:This mentions 1914.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.55 (talk) 14:08, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 1914
Talk:Steve Johnson (Australian footballer)

message: Like many articles on Australian Rules it tends to use footyspeak and sounds like commentary. Needs to read more like an encylopaedia than a fan page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.241.219.207 (talk) 12:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of article
Talk:Charles S. Fairchild

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:FAIRCHILD, Charles S-Treasury (BEP engraved portrait).jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 30, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-04-30. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Charles Somerset, 1st Earl of Worcester

message: The details of his father's affair with Charles' mother Joan Hill are undocumented. Could she have falsely accused Henry Somerset of paternity thereby creating the broken link in the Beaufort male line DNA that has been discovered whilst carrying out Richard III's genetic examination?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beaufort broken link
Talk:Patrick Caddell

message: i'm watching this guy on c-span right now and if he thinks he speaks to young alienated voters, he's crazy - his "strategy" for the republicans is to compare same-sex marriage with polygamy - perhaps a more suitable or more current quote about him would be appropriate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.195.184.215 (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reader opinion

message: I'm amazed at the tone of this article. It could use attention to the refs which some appear to be pure opinion pieces and biased. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE  21:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Came to article, and found 2012 refimprove tag to no longer be helpful. Principle needs of article now are 
* (i) standardization of source formats, to eliminate URL-only formats, at same time checking them to be live; 
* (ii) verification of content to sources, as it appears content was placed first, then citations added post hoc (and in a sloppy fashion); and 
* (iii) making the lead representative of the article.
Because of needs (ii) and (iiii), I added the expert attention needed tag. Otherwise, today, I provided the apparent source of the long block quote, and added the Carter presidency as the main career period for which he is known, to the lede, Good luck to Carter era history editors. Cheers. Le Prof.  73.211.138.148 (talk) 07:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits of this date

message: Every line is sourced, I don't understand the issue label regarding the sources. Can someone explain? Maybe it is just dated and needs to be removed.--FrankTursetta (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources