lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Birmingham Bulls (ECHL)

message: Minor professional ice hockey teams clearly pass Wikipedia:Notability. Flibirigit (talk) 07:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The prodder filed on notability grounds?  Now that's a headspinner and a half.  If I feel bored today, I think I'm going to go over his prods and find out what other doozies he's perpetrating.    Ravenswing  11:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He extracted this information from the Birmingham Bulls article for some reason. I say if you do delete this article, then at least add the information back to that article as it has been the last couple years. I see no reason it was removed from there and split into a separate article...unless it is somehow going to be improved significantly. If it is going to stay in it's current status (stub), then I say merge this section back into the main Bulls hockey article like it has been. --otduff t/c 17:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree.  That two separate, and independent, franchises shared the same name does not warrant the information being combined into one article.  It would be as silly as having one article that talks about both Mike Vernon (ice hockey) and Mike Vernon (producer).  They should be kept as separate articles. Resolute 20:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Should also mention that being a stub is not a valid reason for removal.  There are many avenues that exist to expand the article.  All one has to do is look at our more fully developed team articles for examples. Resolute 20:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Concur on both grounds.  These were separate franchises and require separate articles.    Ravenswing  21:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested deletion

message: Does anyone have this teams records? All I remember is they weren't very good, but they won just about every fight :) Onehotdog93 (talk) 22:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Records
Talk:Imagine That (film)

message: This article is not properly formatted and the format in which it has been presented and the language used are not up to Wikipedia standards. I will try to set the presentation and format right and look forward to more editors contributing to the same. It would be great if anyone of you could find references and cite a few things about thte film from established sources.
Cheers...!!
Manoj Prajwal (talk) 13:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up and Wikify tags explained 

message: I will be updating this article's information as it could be further refreshed. Also the language contained in this article could be less bias towards an actor in the film. More infromation on the film overall could improve its outlook. --Brandonjohnson2 (talk) 23:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update and Organize Article
Talk:Goeznovius

message: I edited that part of the article.
a) there was no bishop of Quimper before 1790 as the bishopric was called Cornouaille then
b) St Goueznou is listed as a bishop of Léon, not Cornwall in my sources.--Svartalf (talk) 01:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cornouaille is not Cornwall in England, but a place in Brittany that is apparently the same as Quimper and Leon. Adam Bishop (talk) 03:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, not really... Cornouaille, which is the same word as Cornwall, both areas being termed as "Kernev" in Breton and Cornish, designates specifically an area to the SOUTH western part of Brittany, and indeed had Quimper as its capital city, whereas the Northern part belonged to Léon. Two completely different bishoprics before the French revolution... Given the time at which St Goueznou lived, the difference is significant. If you will humor me and consult the French wiki lists of bishops for [] and [], you will notice that Goueznou appears on the latter (7th from the top), but definitely not on the former. Distinction between the various bishoprics in Brittany is culturally significant enough that their numbers, respectively for lower and upper Brittany have served to determine the number of white and black stripes on the Flag of Brittany. --Svartalf (talk) 06:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, sorry...I meant they have since been joined together, but at the time, yes they were separate. (I've been working on a list of medieval bishops and this same situation is really frustrating everywhere in Europe!) Adam Bishop (talk) 16:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  bishop of Quimper? really
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Versageek

message: User:Versageek
    run at Tue Dec 11 07:00:35 2007 GMT
Category:              8
Help:                  1
Image talk:            2
Image:                 14
Mainspace              6968
MediaWiki talk:        12
Portal talk:           2
Portal:                1
Talk:                  77
Template talk:         1
Template:              16
User talk:             3005
User:                  167
Wikipedia talk:        151
Wikipedia:             152
avg edits per page     1.83
earliest               05:04, 8 July 2006
number of unique pages 5792
total                  10577
2006/7   9
2006/8   8
2006/9   4
2006/10  15
2006/11  23
2006/12  46
2007/1   25
2007/2   11
2007/3   359
2007/4   2677
2007/5   1472
2007/6   1031
2007/7   1065
2007/8   663
2007/9   1196
2007/10  943
2007/11  702
2007/12  328
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
       Mainspace
54 Internet
50 Mobile phone
50 Webkinz
47 Proxy server
30 Web hosting service
29 Website
29 WikiHow
28 Money
28 Weight loss
27 Advertising
26 Television
26 Child labor
23 Leadership
23 EBay
23 Dieting
             Talk:
5 The Yogurt Connection
4 J. B. Hunt
3 WikiHow
3 Direct marketing
3 Church of Christ (Temple Lot)
2 Aisha's age at marriage
2 New Haven, Connecticut
2 Money
2 Jesus
         Image:
2 Sporting Espinho.gif
2 WikiHow screenshot.png
 MediaWiki talk:
8 Spam-blacklist
4 Spam-whitelist
      Template:
6 Anon
3 Hinduism small
2 Ayyavazhi
2 LingayatismInfobox
           User:
54 Versageek
36 Versageek/monobook.js
12 Versageek/UB
7  Versageek/Uheader
6  Versageek/CribSheet
6  Versageek/ktr award
5  Jimbo Wales
4  Versageek/sandbox
3  PornographicFireParrot
3  Veinor
3  Versageek/ws
2  Versageek/GeorgeMoney.js
2  Kannie
2  Versageek/sign
2  Shadow1
    User talk:
75 Versageek
7  194.106.39.165
6  124.60.232.59
5  71.228.14.6
5  Fadikaouk
5  65.87.165.15
4  58.10.64.35
4  81.24.24.133
4  Egbsystem
4  Hy2000
4  Betacommand
4  Hoopsaddict
4  89.243.229.215
4  88.224.41.92
4  89.216.195.165
                      Wikipedia:
59 Administrator intervention against vandalism
11 Requests for page protection
7  WikiProject on open proxies
4  Verifiability
3  Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
3  Administrators' noticeboard
3  Transwiki log/Articles moved from here/en.wiktionary
2  Requests for adminship/Werdna 2
2  Requests for arbitration
2  Templates for deletion/Log/2007 July 22
2  WikiProject Short article clean-up
2  Requests for adminship/Sir james paul
2  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
2  Requests for adminship/Versageek
       Wikipedia talk:
127 WikiProject Spam
8   External links
3   Spam
3   External links/Archive 16
3   Mirrors and forks
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1], [2], [3]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 07:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Versageek
Talk:Tokimeki Memorial (video game)

message: Where's the anime section ? I can't see it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.28.164.205 (talk) 01:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime 

message: So which is it? 530k by 2002 or 1.1M by 1996? (not watching, please ) czar 01:49, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 00:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject Video games has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 December 2021
Talk:Shen Changping

message: I rewrote the article and removed the information for which I could find no sources, such as birth place. Unfortunately, there isn't much information out there on Shen Changping or the murders, so I don't think this article is going to make it past 
Start class or C class. --*momoricks* (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I've proposed that this article be merged with Shen Changyin. The brothers perpetrated their crimes together and all the sources I looked at mention both brothers. --*momoricks* (talk) 10:59, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Shen Changyin and Shen Changping

message: I rewrote the article and removed the information for which I could find no sources, such as birth place. Unfortunately, there isn't much information out there on Shen Changying or the murders, so I don't think this article is going to make it past 
Start class or C class. --*momoricks* (talk) 10:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I proposed a merge on September 9, 2008 on the Shen Changping talk page, which appears to have been lost in the merging process (doh!). I did not receive any feedback on the proposal so I completed it on September 15, 2008. --*momoricks* (talk) 09:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge completed
Talk:Certified nurse-midwife

message: This article could be deleted or the content merged into the main title at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwifery. I dispute the link between midwifery and medicine. --Tradimus (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Hi all, I'm currently undertaking a project to create a new page of substantial content called "Midwifery in the United States". The new page will outline the history of midwifery in the US as well as current practices. I recognize that this page on nurse midwifery is rather short and should be merged with the main Midwifery page. I will incorporate the content on this page into my new page which is in progress. Which link between midwifery and medicine is disputed?  MonicaHe (talk) 13:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Page In Progress 

message: Dear all, I just wrote a new WIki article on Midwifery in the United States and propose that this page be merged with mine. I have addressed the issues of this page being outdated and also changed the organization to be more clear. Please provide feedback on this as I would like to advance this issue on Wikipedia.
Thank you! MonicaHe (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest for Deletion or Merging to New Page on Midwifery in the United States 
Talk:Tokimeki Memorial 3: Yakusoku no Ano Basho de

message: The recent edits to this page cite the engine for this game as 'Renderware'. This is an unsubstantiated claim and also introduced irrelevant comparisons to Grand Theft Auto III and Driver 2 in the notes and reception section. Concerning reception, sources cited seem vague and did not contain relevant information to the claims made. For example, the specific claim about plagarism comes from a user review aggregation site. The aggregate score and my own anecodatal experiences doesn't dispute the broad claims of poor public reception to this game, but Wikipedia policy does not seem to count user reviews as a reliable source for specific claims.
Concerning the Famitsu score, the web page score for Famitsu is only the original score out of 40 points, multiplied 2.5 times in order to fit into a 100-point scale. Most other articles on video games on Wikipedia reference the magazine score, which is on a 40-point scale. The addition of the 100-point scale feels spurious.
While it appears to make sense to me to revert most of these changes, certain aspects such as the addition citing sales numbers and simply noting the aggregate review score in comparison to the Famitsu score still seems relevant though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaracenOne (talk • contribs) 12:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine and reception section
Talk:Resource allocation

message: Dr. Moreno-Ternero has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Moreno-Ternero has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : BERGANTIÑOS, Gustavo & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan, The axiomatic approach to the problem of sharing the revenue from museum passes, Games and Economic Behavior 89, 78-92 (2015).
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Moreno-Ternero's comment on this article 

message: I believe that in life cycle analysis and other environmental fields, the allocation problem (resource allocation problem redirects to this article) refers to the question who should be held responsible for resources shared in a complex fashion between multiple processes or consumers.
If that is correct, this sense should also be mentioned or a disambiguation page is wanted.
Our LCA article mentions under Goal and scope the ‘allocation methods’ but does not use the term ‘allocation problem’.
PJTraill (talk) 19:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allocation problem in life cycle analysis
Talk:Danylo Shumuk

message: 42 years as political prisoner - some record Bobanni (talk) 08:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely not a speedy deletion candidate, per these news articles. Probably not a regular deletion candidate, either. Zagalejo^^^ 08:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: This is a fascinating bio but the article needs work. Can we get refs to the sources used by author instead of googling around? TIA, --Irpen 08:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I somewhat NPOVed the article and removed some of the info which is more of the general history than directly relevant to D. Sh. Perhaps more general history can me removed. The logic is that we have dedicated articles for such events and trying to retell complex histories in 1-2 sentences rather that link to the appropriate articles is usually a bad idea since a two-sentence summary of the nuanced, complex and controversial events would always give an account that is sloppy at best and often even misleading. But sources first. TIA, --Irpen 08:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic info

message: It is highly unlikely that he served in the "disciplinary battalion", as the article used to say. Only mid- to senior (by rank) commanding officers were sent to shtrafbat (penal battalion), while the lower ranking ones were sent to penal companies (shtrafrota). I corrected for a more general term penal military unit until we get refs. --Irpen 09:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: shtrafbat

message: Thanks for the ref. It is very useful but we should be careful using it. Facts are OK but not judgments since the source is obviously not written by the scholar. The "Disciplinary Battalion" is one of the obvious goofs. It also generously uses the strongly loaded terms and we should be careful to stick with facts and not pass judgments. --Irpen 01:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prava Lyudyny ref

message: I apologize for the loss of useful changes due to an edit conflict glitch. Corrected. Now, let's discuss it in a friendly way but I am still curious how Molobo got to this article. --Irpen 04:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit conflict

message: The main ref says that he moved to Canada in 1987. However, the bibliographic data of his book says it was published there in 1984. --Irpen 05:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, figured it out. He moved to Canada indeed in 1987 but his book was translated and published in Toronto earlier (1984) in his absence. --Irpen 05:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Something wrong

message: Balanced headings to indicate which government and/or political system was in-place at that time in history.Bobanni (talk) 00:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Headings

message: I’m wondering whether this section breaks either WP:NPOV, specifically WP:ASSERT.
It reads too much like a story to me and uses a lot of emotive language (“miserably failing”). I feel like it should be written in a more neutral way focusing on the facts.
Jaredjeya (talk) 15:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Occupation section - WP:ASSERT breach?
Talk:Glasgow Highlanders

message: I've removed the as this is WP:TRIVIA and WP:FANCRUFT, its purpose it seems was to provide an opportunity for an editor to insert the following two low quality images, neither of which is of the real 45157 which was scrapped a long time ago.  The photographs by themselves don't add anything to the article, but for administrative reasons:
File:45157 The Glasgow Highlander at Buxton.jpg|45407 at Buxton in March 2018 while in the identity of scrapped sister no 45157 The Glasgow Highlander.
File:The Glasgow Highlander nameplate.jpg|The Glasgow Highlander nameplate on the drivers side.
I propose that these low quality images should be removed.  Tony May (talk) 09:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it reasonable that there should be a short text mention of the eponymous locomotive and the image of its nameplate or replica nameplate included. The photo taken with dirt on the lens of 45407 has no value here.SovalValtos (talk) 04:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:Mark 24 mine

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Concur -- this article is too short to stand alone.  But the merged article should have a redirect from Mk 27 torpedo.Thewellman (talk) 04:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark 24 Mine merge 

message: According to the current article, it speculates whether U640 or U657 was the first sunk by a Mk.24 Mine. According to uboat.net, U657 was sunk by HMA Swale. So I suspect this option can be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.246.132.177 (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed; there is some confusion over which boat was sunk on 14th, by the Catalina, and which on 17th, by Swale. I've re-written the opener to reflect that. Kemp also refers to U-456 as the first U-boat sunk by FIDO, so I've put that in, too. And uboatnet is actually quite equivocal on the matter, saying  here; "The first confirmed FIDO sinking...occurred 14 May ...and sank U-640 with a MK24 torpedo [more probable is that the first victim was the U-657 on May 17 - Editor]". Xyl 54 (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First success 

message: "Initially 10,000 torpedoes were ordered, but FIDO proved so effective that the order was reduced to 4,000." That doesn't make sense. Why would anyone reduce an order for a successful weapon? Is the word "effective" meant to be "expensive"? 121.209.71.44 (talk) 14:41, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Successful but order reduced? 
Talk:Mind Champions Academy

message: Hi, 
I have just started creating the Mindchampions Academy page. The Academy description is important in the sense that it is an initiative taken by Chess GM Vishwanathan Anand and NIIT(an IT training firm)it helps School children in their development. You may take a call about its importance and relevance afte r the full content is put up.
AK Ghosh
:Hi.  Please see WP:Notability for our policies on notability.  It's not how important something is that is the criteria used.  This is because importance is highly subjective.  To pass as notable a topic needs to be covered in multiple independent sources.  Taemyr (talk) 08:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bill White (footballer, born 1907)

message: Re: Mr White being dead: this news story from 2007 states that Gillingham's oldest living former player had just died aged 90, which means he was born in 1917.  Bill White cannot therefore have been alive at this point, as if he was then Mr Scott would not have been the club's oldest living former player.  Hope that makes sense....... ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perfect! That's exactly what I was looking for, thanks for clearing that up! Cheers, CP 16:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deceased
Talk:Dave Shearer

message: David sadly died a few days ago, you need to update ! 2407:7000:9C69:C300:852C:D3A5:DEDC:2E2C (talk) 06:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has mentioned that since yesterday morning...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Shearer
Talk:Hexachord

message: "Milton Babbitt's serial theory extends the term hexachord to refer to a six-note segment of a twelve-tone row." was removed as uncited, as "Allen Forte, The Structure of Atonal Music (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1973):" was as failed verification. Hyacinth (talk) 04:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Allen Forte & Milton Babbitt

message: Please include a translation for "nisi ad montem formosum".50.164.139.121 (talk) 01:45, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Latin without translation 

message: There is a musical example of  Hauer's tropes, but it is never discussed in the text. 50.164.139.121 (talk) 01:51, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hauer's tropes
Template talk:US state flags

message: Why is there a broken link given for the New York flag? The page exists.Scobiedont (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag of New York error

message: If you hover over the link to Flag of Puerto Rico there is an extra space found after its name. Adueppen (talk) 17:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra space after Puerto Rico?
Talk:Confession (law)

message: The polish translation of this article is incorrect. The english article says about Confession (polish: "zeznanie"), while the polish article says about rights/authorisation/entitlement (polish: "uprawnienie"). My suggested solution - to cross out the connection/link between both articles.
:Removed from English article. ElectricLemon (talk) 15:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

message: James Duane argues, "If your client is guilty and really ought to be punished, and really ought to go through some sort of a cleansing act of contrition, and fess up, and admit his guilt, there'll be plenty of time to do that; they almost always do. No need to rush, no need to tell the police something. Wait and see if perhaps your client can work out some sort of an arrangement where maybe he'll make some sort of compensation to the alleged victim, or maybe he'll be able to get some sort of a discount on his sentence. And he'll be treated fairly then, like everybody else who had the benefit of a good lawyer who said 'please do not talk to the police.'"
Those who confess immediately, rather than after a plea bargain has been negotiated, tend to get punished more harshly. The usual justification for this is that people who confess immediately are stupid, and there's nothing wrong with punishing people for being stupid. Other than that, it doesn't make a lot of sense, because the person who confesses immediately is being more cooperative (and perhaps more contrite) than the person who waits till later to confess. Threeomp (talk) 20:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the admissibility of confessions help serve the interests of justice