Talk:List of ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy

message: I edited the first class submarines list but there were several uncertain types. So I removed them temporarily, but if You know, revert them please.
* KRS type  Kiraisen type?
* L4 type  L type was the old 2nd class.
* B4 type  S49A? but it was the plan only.
* C4 type  S49B? but it was the plan only.
* ST type  Toku type(=Sentoku) or Senkou type? (Sentaka was misreading of Senkou)
* SH type  Senho type?
* TK type  Toku type?
Byouyou 11:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncertain types of 1st class submarines 

message: Even though I'm not an expert at Japanese warships, I could find an obvious error with this page. For example, Akizuki class destroyers in this page means those used in WW2, however, the link points to those built after the end of WW2. These two classes are absolutely different, even though they are using the same name (For example, CV Enterprise in WW2 is a different one  from the nuclear carrier Enterprise).
===Almeida?===
If she's class ship, why does her page list Momi as Matsu-class...? And what happened to the 1915 Momos?  confusedsailorman 03:37 & 05:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Link (Akitzuki class DD) 

message: If she's class ship, why does her page list Momi as Matsu-class...? And what happened to the 1915 Momos?  confusedsailorman 03:37 & 05:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Almeida?

message: This is correct here? Sparviero class is younger a bit than the IJN or not? --188.142.193.35 (talk) 22:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sparviero class - Patrol vessels 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071015214059/http://earth.endless.ne.jp/users/mac0115/nihonnnokanntei7.html to http://earth.endless.ne.jp/users/mac0115/nihonnnokanntei7.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose to merge List of early warships of Japan into List of ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy. The former is merely a duplicate of the latter's Medieval warships section; there's no need for a stand-alone list with only 4 entries which are already covered here. Pinging  and , who proposed the early warships article for deletion for this reason about a year ago, as well as  who objected to the proposed deletion. 
I also wonder, but this is unrelated to the merge, how the distinction between 'medieval' and 'early modern' is defined. For example, the San Juan Bautista, listed as medieval, is literally described as a Western-style sail warship, which is itself a subsection of the early modern section.  Lennart97 (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've performed the merge. I've also renamed the Medieval warships section to Early warships as 'medieval' doesn't mean anything in a Japanese context. Lennart97 (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I think a straight list lacks usefulness so I converted to tables. Starting with the Battleship section, see how it goes. Hungrydog55 (talk) 00:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info + new format 

message: Hi, everyone. In the spirit of my previous post, I have reformatted the first bunch of destroyers. See what you think. If anyone feels like doing some casual proofreading, by all means have at it. Hungrydog55 (talk) 02:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st pass at new format for destroyers