lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seven Sisters, East Sussex

message: Can we get any kind of verification on why the Seven Sisters are used as pretend White Cliffs of Dover? The text here said "as they are no longer white", but I see no reference at White Cliffs of Dover to any historically recent change of colour. I've put back in what seems to me a more likely explanation (I think it used to be on the Eastbourne article) about the White Cliffs being overdeveloped, and hard to show without anachronism, but our photos don't really bear that one out, either, so I'm not 100% sure. -- IMSoP 10:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Cliffs of Dover 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Seven Sisters Panorama, East Sussex, England - May 2009.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 9, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-08-09. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 18:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Seven Sisters Panorama, East Sussex, England - May 2009.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: I see there is a requirement for a citation for this. It is referenced on the Robertson War Memorial on the site as being bequeathed to the National Trust. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1438452 I realise that is not, in itself, enough but may, with some research, unearth something acceptable. -- James Robertson 13 Sept 2019.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.147.81.77 (talk) 09:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michel Dean
Talk:Mega Man

message: The Rockman X Dive part of the Mega Man X section is starting to get a bit long and convoluted. It may be time to create a page of its own to link to such that we can get its mention back down to a brief summary rather than the long ramblings of fan jargon. StuOnThis (talk) 19:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and removed all the unnecessary info about Rockman X Dive since this page isn't the place for that kind of information. I added a link to its Japanese Wikipedia page as an English language page does not yet exist. I encourage anyone interested to create one. StuOnThis (talk) 13:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rockman X Dive 

message: Is there any source that says that the Mega Man film was sold to Netflix? I couldn't find any. BestDaysofMusic (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netflix 

message: Can someone explain to me why User:Shadowboxer2005 has been allowed to tarnish and butcher this page? It should not take 26 DAYS to revamp an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to a major franchise. Such changes should have been prepared in advance and be done in a day so as to not disrupt any visitor to the page. There wasn't even any discussion on the talk page about such a revamp. Admittedly, I see scores of information without proper citations on the old revisions, but that's what templates are for: any information that isn't verified can be removed. I'm not waiting around for someone who can't be bothered to finish their work; they can reverse the edit once they're actually DONE the prep work. 
Yet another fine example of donations to the Wikimedia Foundation flushed down the toilet.Thecleanerand (talk) 00:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: there was fan-movie , its web is discontinued , but someone probably have copy 194.160.215.10 (talk) 15:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  existing movie ?! 

message: I've noticed some oddities in the way articles are titled for the handheld series:
* Mega Man II (1991 video game)
* Mega Man III (Game Boy)
* Mega Man IV (Game Boy)
* Mega Man V (Game Boy)
Despite them all being qualified with (inconsistent) disambiguations, all of these have redirects (Mega Man II, Mega Man III, Mega Man IV, and Mega Man V) from the unqualified titles, which seems to contradict site policies at WP:QUALIFIER. From my understanding of the policy, either Mega Man II, Mega Man III, Mega Man IV, and Mega Man V should become disambiguation pages if the titles are indeed ambiguous, or the articles on the Game Boy games should be moved over the unqualified titles if they're the WP:PRIMARYTOPICs as the current redirects suggest.
(Mega Man: Dr. Wily's Revenge is fine, no change needed.) HappyWith (talk) 09:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handheld series article titles
Talk:The Dissociatives (album)

message: There's a quote in the article lead, using the word "vicaciousness" from Rolling Stone.  Could someone with access to the magazine please check to ensure that that is the word actually used there?  I only ask because "vicaciousness" is not a word, nor is its apparent root "vicacious"...  Tomertalk 07:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info request 
Talk:The Heat (Toni Braxton album)

message: I'm moving the article from its current title "The Heat" to "The Heat (Toni Braxton album)". There are four different meanings of the term "The Heat", so I'm making it into a new disambiguation page. If there are any major problems that occur due to this move, let me know. --JamieS93 20:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving article
Talk:Icon of Coil

message: I found a song that definetly includes Andy LaPlegua's voice, it was entitled "God Bless" it is about 6 mins long and just bless serial killers. The filewas deleted from my computer so i was wondering if it was by Combichrist or Icon of Coil?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by St.Jimmy666 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's performed by Combichrist. But where do You got Andy's voice there? On the original version that's aviable on the album "Everybody Hates You" there's only a female voice speaking the murderers names and "god bless". Maybe You had an live version (propably from M'Era Luna 2005?) Miszter_eromu 23:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  God Bless? 
Talk:Want Two

message: * http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/arts/music/blog/20851688/one-song-rufus-wainwrights-the-art-teacher ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for The Art Teacher
Talk:Sargon (chess)

message: I'm not sure the mention of Reversi belongs in the article. I'm talking about this sentence from the "Sequels" section: "In 1980, the Spracklens' Reversi game finished in first place at a computer tournament at Northwestern University, and in 1981 it finished in third place at the Santa Cruz Open Othello Tournament."
It's tangentially related and possibly interesting, but is it sufficiently relevant to be here? Ntsimp (talk) 13:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversi 

message: I propose that the content of this game be split into a separate page called Sargon III. The content of the current page seems off-topic and these sections are large enough to make their own page. As seen on this version of the page, I believe I have ample reviews and content to have a worthy separate page; in addition, I found one more review here: . Having all of that information on the main Sargon page would unnecessarily bloat one small section with too many details about a single spin-off, while there are clearly enough sources for Sargon III to meet the WP:GNG and develop into a sizeable article. 2601:243:1C80:6740:DC2B:6DF7:CF88:4464 (talk) 16:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sargon III: Splitting proposal
Template talk:German title Freiherr

message: </div>
: Insead of , one can use  to have the references displayed in a smaller font. --Swift 19:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Templates are great for sharing content or maintaining a consistent style or structure of content. The "German title" templates seem to have changed little and therefore there isn't all that much need for the template transclutions.
Every time the page is loaded, it makes an extra call to the database to include the template. This can be avoided by placing "subst:" in front of the template name: . The template text is then copied into the article as it would appear.
To maintain a list of the pages where the template has been used — as can currently be generated by the "What links here" link in the toolbox — a category could be created to which the template would add the page to. --Swift 22:43, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using substitutions 

message: This should read "was a title". The nobility in Germany was abolished decades ago, so nowadays any Freiherr etc. is simply a part of the name and NOT a title anymore. --Rosenzweig 18:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Freiherr IS a title, the same way Archduke is a title in English (Canada, the United States, the UK, etc don't have archdukes, do they?). It is a word in German that is a title, used sometimes in the surnames of former baronial families. But it means that same thing as it did before WWI (which is baron) even if the law doesn't back it up. Charles 15:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is incorrect. Things like 'Freiherr', 'Prinz' in german names are mere part of the Surnames since 1920 when nobility was abolished and this regulation was passed in the Law called 'Preußisches Gesetz über die Aufhebung der Standesvorrechte des Adels und die Auflösung des Hausvermögens'. You can distinguish whether it is a title or not by the persons date of birth and the position of the word within it's name: Today it's name is Richard Karl Freiherr von Weizsäcker, a hundred years ago his name would have been Freiherr Richard von Weizsäcker. See :de:Adelstitel#Deutschland for Details. --Gnu1742 (talk) 11:49, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freiherr is NOT a title
Talk:Economy of Georgia (country)

message: In the legend for the first chart of this article, the phrase "Georgia and other FSC" appears. FSC is not defined and I cannot find a likely definition by searching online. 2A00:23EE:1038:A648:B9A0:3EA4:ED64:369A (talk) 20:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  FSC requires to be defined
Talk:The Chemical Wedding (Bruce Dickinson album)

message: ----
Shouldn't the article of the film be separated?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.139.161.106 (talk) 12:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:A Young Person's Guide to King Crimson

message: The LP's spine, inner, and the disc labels all title this 'The Young Persons' Guide...', not 'A Young Person's Guide...'.
I'd change the article and position of the apostrophe myself, but I'm not sure how it would affect any links. 86.129.87.141 (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added Island Records to the list of record labels that released this album. Initially, this album was released on Island Records in the UK and I should know becuase I happen to have this album in my ever growing vinyl library.
I just thought that I would share.Frschoonover (talk) 15:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:B'Boom: Live in Argentina

message: I should have added this note when I made the correction/addition to the text, but I was completely unaware of the 'Talk' section - for this, I apologise.
The full story is as follows (if someone wants to tidy up my contribution):- An Italian bootlegging crew went to South America with the express intention of illegally recording 3 bands, of which King Crimson were one. When the bootleg came out, it was extortionately priced, and the sound quality was very poor. To counter this bootleg, King Crimson rush-released "B'boom". In their haste, they transplanted the line-up/instrument credits off the "THRAK" album, which included Mellotron played by Robert Fripp. Fripp did indeed play Mellotron on THRAK, but it does not appear on B'boom - Crimson last toured with Mellotrons in 1974.
In support of this, I have added the sub-section on the article, as it is an error on the CD sleeve. Similarly, I have removed 'Mellotron' from Robert Fripp's instrument credit at the bottom of the Wiki article. Although it doesn't match what's printed on the CD sleeve, it is factually correct.
Taff Hewitt (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error on instrument credits
Talk:Dynamic nuclear polarization

message: http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms13914
Nonlinear detection of secondary isotopic chemical shifts in NMR through spin noise, online published 9 January 2017.
--Helium4 (talk) 12:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New corrected general theory 

message: Re: "and to the is hyperfine interaction" I suspect the is is redundant. But it might just be my ignorance re the subject. ϢereSpielChequers 22:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Now seems to be fixed. ϢereSpielChequers 17:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: possible typo
Talk:Epitaph (King Crimson album)

message: There is a Necrophagist album of this same name. Could someone put a link at the top for those wishing to access that one? 72.195.182.192 22:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Necrophagist Album 
Talk:Mikhail Semyonovich Vorontsov

message: Okay -- I made the article mainly with text from the 1911 Britannica -- I don't know much about his early life. But I think the Britannica article was WAY too kind about his handling of the situation in the Caucasus. Any other opinions? For now, I changed it around a bit, but I'd like to expand on his role in the HORRIBLE Dargo expedition. Okay. --The PNM 02:33, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 12:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Mikhail Semyonovich Vorontsov never was a Prince. Russian have ranks Prince, Knyaz, Graf, e.t.c. It is why better do not combine Prince and Knyaz - it is various possibilities and resposibilities. The Prince can be and Knyaz at the same time due to father (King or Tsar) can present any big region to own son, the big territory which will coincide the Knyaz renk and can be bigger if he is the Prince also. And not every Knyaz can be a Prince. Prince on Russian is the son of the Tsar or King. Mikhail Semyonovich Vorontsov never was a son of the Tsar or King. Vorontsov family are not the Tsat or King family. It is why he may not be a Prince. It is big mistake to call give the Prince rank to Vorontsov.
Vorontsov leaved Odessa in 1844 and joined Russian Army in Caucas mountains in 1845. He was a Graf before 1844 and he became a Knyaz from 1845. He back in Odessa in 1856 (or 1855) and was not a General-Governor in the last years, and soon died in 1856. When I read that somebody in Odessa had protection from the Vorontsov before 1845 it is means that protection was fron the Graf Vorontsov and not from the Knyaz Vorontsov.Грищук ЮН (talk) 05:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mikhail Semyonovich Vorontsov]] 
Talk:Pottery Barn Kids

message: I've deleted the "Inc." because I see no indication that PBK is separately incorporated.  It appears to be a division of Williams-Sonoma.  I also deleted the :Category:Companies of Sweden -- Williams-Sonoma is a U.S. company and nothing I noticed on the website supported the claim that the company is Swedish.  If Williams-Sonoma started PBK by acquiring a Swedish company, that fact should be incorporated into the article.  (The W-S website says that Pottery Barn was acquired by W-S in 1986.    Even if Pottery Barn was originally Swedish, I think PBK was created after the company was acquired by W-S.)  I also deleted two of the external links: the "Tyson's Corner" link because the site is about a shopping center and has very scanty information about PBK, and the "Fit Pregnancy" link because, although PBK is in the heading, it's not clear what the relationship is.  (Some of the products in this 2003 article aren't in the current PBK online catalog.  Either they're from other companies or they were discontinued.  The link to the company website is enough to let the reader find the current catalog.) JamesMLane 02:42, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:In the Wake of Poseidon

message: The album "repeats the style of their first album". Actually the 2nd, 3rd, 4th songs are an exact copy of songs on the first, the only difference being to some extent melodical and textual. Can someone find a reference? --SCIdude (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Near copy? 

message: The section about the album's cover seems to contain original research about the descriptions of each face, as neither reference in the preceding line gives such detailed descriptions. Liassica (talk) 22:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible original research in "Album Cover" section
Talk:Islands (King Crimson album)

message: Nice and short article.  Some details of the album's sound could probably be elaborated on.  I'd also like to add that the cover art is of the Trifid Nebula MrAngy 07:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I read somewhere that Robert Fripp once actually apologized to his mother live and onstage for the lyrics in Ladies of the Road, if anyone can back this up or would like to add this to the article, I've armed you with the information to do so. AlexRochon 21:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Putting 'Fripp mother "Ladies of the Road" apologized' into a search engine yields no promising results. I don't suppose you remember anything about where you read this?--Martin IIIa (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ladies

message: since this album had two different widely distributed covers back in ye olde vinyl days (UK and US?) the alternate cover should be included as well
J Edward Malone (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternate album cover 

message: I feel we need a much longer and more detailed entry.  It should include if possible material and comments from the artists.  I felt that reviews from the time, nearly 50 years ago, should only be the starting point for a proper critical assessment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.228.58 (talk) 08:17, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more
Talk:Level Five (EP)

message: perhaps there could be an entry for this album, instead of a redirect back to the main King Crimson page
J Edward Malone (talk) 22:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ????

message: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_Five_(EP)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grnaz (talk • contribs) 14:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have a look
Talk:King Crimson Live at Summit Studios

message: There is an error (actually 2 if you want to be pedantic) in the "Personnel" section. Fripp and Collins are both credited as playing Mellotron. I have a copy of this CD, and there is NO Mellotron to be heard. Under normal circumstances, Fripp and Collins would have played Mellotron on stage (and did, in fact, play them at the Sound Track, Denver for the next 2 successive nights), but they didn't play them in the Summit Studios. I'm guessing that the information on this site came from the CD sleevenotes, which are wrong.
Taff Hewitt (talk) 19:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Lizard (album)

message: I just added a "tone" template to the article - don't have the time to work on it now, but I think it could use some reworking. It uses too many flowery words and sounds too much like a glowing album review. flod logic 05:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: I'm confused about it's description- do the letters of King or of Crimson represent the suite lizard? The article states It is represented by Crimson, but then there's an image of the Beatles there, which corresponds to the first side of the album...190.226.88.114 (talk) 15:42, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Album Cover

message: I'm thinking the section on live performances, esp by 21st Century Schizoid and the current (as of 2018) line-up, should be its own section or down in Reception? It isn't really relevant to the album's production or history in that context. Acroyear (talk) 15:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Live Performances
Talk:Thrakattak

message: This album is widely considered one of the most unlistenable albums ever made, in the vein of Lou Reed's Metal Machine Music.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vrooom Vrooom

message: I added the infobox, complete with all info I could find, and uploaded the file for the album cover here, but it won't cooperate with the infobox for some reason.  I know I uploaded the file correctly and that I am spelling the file name correctly, it just refuses to work.  Maybe I'm missing something.  --yaninass2 |  talk 01:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I switched to a differently formatted template and now the album art works fine.  I still don't know what the problem was. --yaninass2 |  talk 02:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Cross elasticity of demand

message: Hello, can anyone check if the new diagram that I have added is correct? Thanks. wykis 15:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Diagram 

message: Somebody please explain what the A and B in the equation stand for. Thanks. --Cryout 22:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is A, what is B?
Talk:J. D. Souther

message: What about the band J D was in during his high school year in Amarillo. Named THE CINDERS, 3-piece, Charles Bates guitar, Steve Dodge Guitar and JD Drums. Stanley Dodge sometimes played Bass.
JD was thrown out of the Tascosa High School Choir. Was also in the Tascosa High School Orchestra.
First recording I know of was "Day before Tomorrow" recorded in Clovis NM @ Norman Petty's studio.
How about "Longbranch Pennywhistle" a Souther/Frey album.
Souther did not write "Home" for Bonnie Raitt's album. It was written by Karla Bonoff. I'll delete that entry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Airproofing (talk • contribs) 16:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Another note about J D Souther:  He was inducted into the Hall of Fame at Tascosa High School in Amarillo, Texas.  His cousin, Patti K Nuss Oates  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.232.54.94 (talk) 17:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  J D Souther inducted into the Hall of Fame at Tascosa High School in Amarillo. 

message: I'm just saying!  I'd try to fix this but I'm working to keep an article from getting deleted for good right now.  Anyone care to fix this and maybe list some of his other well-known songs for others?  Thanks.  LiPollis (talk) 11:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: This article uses the word "eponymous" way too many times
Talk:List of jam bands

message: These ones:
* Led Zeppelin
* Pink Floyd
* Red Hot Chili Peppers
* Ween
* Primus
* Talking Heads
The first 3 definitely shouldn't be on here, since although they have jams, so do most rock bands... and their jams don't really follow traditional jam band ideas of lengthy improvisations. I feel like the person who put them on here wanted to include super popular bands who solo on the list without any rational reason for them to be here. Might as well put every progressive rock and blues rock band ever on here if you're going to include these three, but seriously don't. 
The next two are a bit jammier, but not really. They'll occasionally have jams, but for the most part (despite the fact they attracted a lot of jam band fans) are more straight forward like the first three. It can be especially confusing since Les Claypool is in a couple of jam bands and works with Trey Anastasio from time to time, but his main band Primus is more straightforward alternative metal, funk, and occasionally prog and jazz fusion. 
As for Talking Heads... why on Earth would anyone put them on here? They're funky pop rock and rarely do anything even close to jamming. 
So unless you believe that every band that has solos, including occasional long ones, should be on here, I'd refrain from re-adding any of these bands.  Mrmoustache14 (talk) 22:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: I removed some bands from the list

message: I'd consider them a jam band. 2601:646:8D01:EA0:DC67:CFA1:46F7:8426 (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's The Mars Volta?