Talk:Mexican drug war

message: The "course of the conflict" section needs to be updated. With the deaths of Lazcano (I know he's marked dead in the infobox, but it should be included in the article as well) and  Manuel Torres Félix, the section should definitely be updated. Just adjusting the infobox is not good enough. -- FutureTrillionaire (talk) 22:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the current events are found in the cartels' articles and in the drug bosses biographies (Heriberto Lazcano Lazcano, Infighting in the Gulf Cartel and Infighting in Los Zetas, for example). I think we should update some information but not move away from its main goal: give an overall and general view of what's going on in Mexico. Details should be in biographies and in the cartels' articles. What's your take? ComputerJA (talk) 23:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I got the sense that this is a war article. Not much different from the Syrian civil war or the War in Afghanistan. Any war article should have a "plot of the war" section, that describes the events of the war, and that it should be updated when necessary. -- FutureTrillionaire (talk) 23:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Feel free to update the article. Right now I'm solely concentrating on biographies, and I'll probably stick with them for some months. ComputerJA (talk) 23:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The war is still in flux and updates on the most relevant events are still needed. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 15:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Lazcano incident 7 October 2012 is appearing twice. Cheers, User: Bas Vossen (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be updated 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Keep seeing this issue being added and removed, with both sides not offering much in the way of discussion. Personally I favor deletion; most of the sources currently used to support the allegations are from conspiracy theory or otherwise fringe political sites. Some of them don’t even talk about the Mexican Drug War at all (one goes on and on about the Contras but hardly even mentions Mexico). Get better sources or don’t include it, that’s my stance.Jogarz1921 (talk) 23:17, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Great. I also want to notify  (courtesy ping) that we are doing this, since he reverted a change you made. MX (✉ • ✎) 02:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I support that deletion. A few CIA incidents were taken out of context and used to build conspiracy theories. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 02:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this action, after seeing the sources it uses. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 07:13, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, if a town's local mafia hires some Chinese dudes to shake some store owners for "protection", it does not mean that that the Cartel(s) are formally supported by China. The same with FARC, as they will sell cocaine to any buyer. That Infobox is full of alleged (unproven) links blown out of proportions, and make it look like a summary of World War 3. That is unacceptable. The consensus seems to clean it up (delete them). So I am going ahead.  Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: US support for Cartels?

message: I would  just add that it seems odd to me that the PRI is labeled as "centrist." It seems more fitting to call them a less loaded term like "institutionalist" or "dominant party." Their long history of populism, nationalization, and protectionism hardly earns them the deference of "centrist." Although maybe that can be considered the center in Mexico.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.205.14.135 (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. . Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 14:19, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PRI as "Centrist" 

message: The Mexican president Lopez Obrador declared that the war is over and he won't pursue it anymore: http://time.com/5517391/mexico-president-ends-drug-war/ 187.179.128.117 (talk) 19:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This war did not stop overnight just because AMLO said so unilaterally. If he proposed a coherent strategy, we have not heard of it and nothing stops the narcos to continue their war against the population and against other competing cartels. A campaign promise is far from having ended the war. Do not confuse facts with demagoguery. The violence continues, and many capos are still to be arrested, and they will not go down peacefully, nor their rivals will respect the vacuum left.  Rowan Forest (talk) 19:57, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug War over? 

message: The infobox has been greatly reduced. The main problem is that our readers are misled into believing that the cartels are all on the same side. Jim Michael (talk) 11:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ibox 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 09:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Mexican Drug War →  – No apparent reason for caps here.  This is a descriptive title, usually lowercased in sources when not in a title. Dicklyon (talk) 00:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 September 2020 

message: The map used in the infobox, File:Criminal organizations presence (2020).png, is presented in said infobox in a way which implies that it is a territorial map, represents where in the states each cartel is located. But it’s not, it seems to show what state each cartel has a presence in, in a manner which looks like a territorial map. This is confusing, as seen by derivative maps (:File:La Familia Michoacana presence.png, :File:Los Zetas presence.png, and :File:Sinaloa Cartel presence.png) which use it to display the territory of specific cartels. I’ve been bold and removed it, but it)s going to need to be discussed further here I feel. MRN2electricboogaloo (talk) 06:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Criminal organizations presence (2020).png and its use 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kdavis25 (talk) 22:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LIBR 1 Working with Sources

message: The term "War on drugs" originated in American politics, referring to a wide range of policies meant to suppress domestic use of illegal drugs. The term is designed to be incendiary and motivating to American voters without representing any specific political program, and it does not refer to some kind of ongoing military conflict in the United States between drug dealers and the government, as there is in Mexico. Therefore, it is not appropriate to uncritically describe the low-intensity civil war the Mexican people have suffered as "a theatre of the war on drugs." Therefore, I have simply moved the "war on drugs" phrasing to a little lower in the article's lead. Spacemarine10 (talk) 20:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lead sentence should be changed 

message: Specifically, while not confirmed whether to be a drug cartel or not, it is likely either a gang or a cartel, the funky town infamous gore video.  It's a horrible video to watch, but I feel as though with the level of infamy it's gained online, it should at least get a minor mention, with a disclaimer saying it's unconfirmed as to whether it's a drug cartel. Theweast234 (talk) 09:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentions of the brutal executions?   

message: The conflict has been quite deadly, and the sources on it in the “List of ongoing armed conflicts” Wikipedia page prove it. LordOfWalruses (talk) 01:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Low-intensity conflict” isn’t really accurate