Talk:Jumpgate: The Reconstruction Initiative

message: just thinking maybe the name should be updated, its now "Jumpgate:Attack of the Flux"
Also, Plan on adding a section for the ModX and proably all the removed items that I can find lol.
:Please next time you post add an id like Mrja84 to let people know who you are. Anyway, the game is still Jumpgate: The Reconstruction Initiative because Attack of the Conflux was just an expansion. ---Mrja84 Sept 04, 2005 17:33 (ESDT)
Goodness, this is convoluted. Is there any good reason for every ship type in the game to be documented in a table here? Is this appropriate content for an encyclopedia entry about the game? --ellF 15:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Who would like to assist me in raising the quality of this page? We need to determine what can stay and what can go. Add new information if it obey's WP standards. -- (Mrja84 15:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Looking For Volunteers

message: There are many problems with this article. I do like the intro section, but just about everything else is fluff that appears to have been cut and pasted from their web sites. For one, the wikipedia is not a game guide. Lists of ships and a detailed "historical" backstory are not the sort of thing that belong here. I am thinking of removing them both. Secondly the "Gameplay features" section is clearly copied from a web site. It has absolutely nothing that one could call a "description" of the game, and is therefore essentially useless for someone (like me) who might be looking for an NPOV description. I would like to cut this out too. Maury 20:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree and I'm attempting to "cut the fat". (Mrja84 15:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very poor quality 

message: A few screenshots would be useful. Drutt 22:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenies 

message: :Image:Jumpgate01.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Jumpgate01.gif

message: NetDevil doesn't advertise Jumpgate as an Action MMOG; they call it a massively multiplayer online space simulator … or something similar to that. -Aaedien 17:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A possible change

message: :Image:Jumpgate01.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Jumpgate01.gif

message: :Image:Logo hyperial.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo hyperial.gif

message: I just spent a couple hours last night trying to see what's happening in JumpGate and things look pretty dead.  The company that (currently?) owns JumpGate appears to have not given any acknowledgement of its existence (or of the existence of NetDevil) and all of its present and past employees appear to be under strict non-disclosure, so not much has come through official channels.  The website(s) are still up and appear to be functioning properly, however the account login / creation page is gone.  From the forums that are left I get the impression that things have been this way since last April when a large number of NetDevil employees were released.  Unfortunately there's so much of a lid on this that I doubt anything can be said that satisfies either WP:OR or WP:RS (I'm reading all this information through forum speculations and third-party declarations anyhow).  In this kind of situation, can anything be done to flag this fact in Wikipedia or is this page going to be as frozen in time as the official website? Odysseus (talk) 02:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This looks pretty dead, but no one can document it? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jumpgate: The Reconstruction Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041031082744/http://www.netdevil.com/ to http://www.netdevil.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified