Talk:Grossmont Union High School District

message: I am concerned that much of the information on this page does not have any citations. Also most of the information in the history section is only a few years old. There is little, if any, older information. This would help the article quite a bit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jojhutton (talk • contribs) 17:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

message: I am concerned by Jojhutton's repeated deletions of my contributions to this article. Contrary to his opinion, I believe that the text I added is written in a neutral point of view and without bias. I have provided thorough and adequate references to my contributions. Furthermore, I find that all of the added information is highly relevant and provides a more detailed and critical analysis of the subject with regard to its recent history and other important and related current events. Rather than simply delete the text, which I see as unsatisfactory and unhelpful, I propose that he or another user take the time to edit it so as to render it more neutral and less biased. The Grossmont Unified High School District (GUHSD) has been the subject of controversies and scandals, which were not sufficiently addressed in the article prior to my contributions. Moreover, GUHSD has, without question, entered the realm of politics in recent years. Not to provide a discussion of its politicization would be detrimental to its understanding. User:Oleander arms  —Preceding undated comment was added at 02:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for commenting on the talk page. You may not be aware of how the editing process works, but if you add something and it gets reverted, it is not policy to just add it again. You must begin a discussion, especially when the information bears way too much weight and is not written NPOV. They way you have it written now must be reverted at once. I am willing to discuss, but I will still remove the POV as it has no place on wikipedia. Please wait until there is a consensus before adding it again. And just a heads up for you, naming a section Discriminatory policies is sort what I like to call a POV red flag.--Jojhutton (talk) 02:35, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a blog. If you feel that the information is pertanent and needs to be told, then please go to a web-site that allows such information. As such, any information that is added to wikipedia must conform to its policies. The section that you added had serious problems with WP:Undue weight, NPOV, and WP:bias. I am not arguing whether or not the einformation is true or not, I am saying that wikipedia articles must be written in a nuetral point of view. It is not up to me to fix it. It is up to you to write it nuetrally.--Jojhutton (talk) 12:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

text: It still has problems with WP:Undue Weight, and I failed to mention recentism earlier. With WP:Recentism, the problem is that now, about half of the article is devoted to events that happened in just the last few years. The district is nearly ninety years old. We can't add just the new stuff without balancing the older events. I still don't see where you balanced the POV. Adding alledged does not balance the POV on the section title. See WP:Weasel. You don't need to add the alledged on the section title for the sexual misconduct since the teacher was convicted. Still the section has merit, but the problem is that if you add the Helix teachers, then what about all of the others through the years? Its not fair to add those and not any others. In order to gain a more balanced discussion, perhaps you can ask for a third opinion, if you think I am not being fair? Although I still see the sections as against wikipedia policy, you ARE attempting to make it better, so I will not remove it at this time, but be advised that if a consensus is reached to remove the information, we will have no choice but to either delete it or to make major changes.--Jojhutton (talk) 01:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion concern

message: I have been casually and silently observing the recent edits for the past week. Although I see where you may be going with all of this, I must intercede. You may not be aware that the Lemon Grove school that you refered to in one of the sections is not a memeber of the GUHSD, nor has it ever been. The information is misplaced and needs to be removed from the article and placed somewhere else. Perhaps the article on Lemon Grove itself.--Jojhutton (talk) 03:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a feeder school, but with its own school board and staff. It is not a member of GUHSD. The paragraph was misleading, since it had nothing to do with the district at all, and should have been relagated to another article. If there is not an article on the Lemon Grove school district, you are welcome to create one, as long as it it created from NPOV.--Jojhutton (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemon Grove School 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Grossmont Union High School District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080415153327/http://archives.cnn.com:80/2001/US/03/22/school.shooting.05/ to http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/03/22/school.shooting.05/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060618055544/http://www.signonsandiego.com:80/news/op-ed/editorial2/20020320-9999_1ed20bottom.html to http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/op-ed/editorial2/20020320-9999_1ed20bottom.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081029064047/http://portal.guhsd.net/portal/page/portal/GUHSD_SUPER/BOARD/BOARD_DOCS/Resolutions/Support%20of%20Prop%208.pdf to http://portal.guhsd.net/portal/page/portal/GUHSD_SUPER/BOARD/BOARD_DOCS/Resolutions/Support%20of%20Prop%208.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grossmont Union High School District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010120530/http://www.acswasc.org/pdf_general/WASC_DirectoryAccreditedSchools.pdf to http://www.acswasc.org/pdf_general/WASC_DirectoryAccreditedSchools.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grossmont Union High School District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311081314/http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/sr/cs/ap/distingcounty.asp?county=37&submit1=Submit to http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/sr/cs/ap/distingcounty.asp?county=37&submit1=Submit
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified