Talk:The Glass Teat

message: I haven't read this collection of essays myself, but the opening paragraph definitely strikes me as being POV. I find it necessary to tag this article's neutrality. Kearby 23:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Paragraph 

message: :Image:Glassteet.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Glassteet.jpg

message: I read both of these books while in College about thirty years ago.  How does someone write a neutral POV Wikipedia article on a book that is a collection of opinion pieces?  No matter what is written it seems that someone could object because the subject material not neutral.  
I remember that these critiques of television revealed to me just how bad and contrived the programming really was and how addictive it was in that I could not stop watching television until going cold turkey without one to watch.  Many of the reviews are in the context of the politics of the Nixon era.  The Smothers Brothers Comedy show and its cancellation.  The Tim Conway Show and it's fate.  In one of the columns Ellison claimed to have made the Nixon Enemies list for suggesting that Spiro Agnew used Readers Digest as a DIY magazine.  (Ellison's name does not appear on the "Master List" here at Wikipedia.)  Ellison recounts how a program called "The Young Lawyers" was revamped to move minority characters into supporting roles  to make room for a new character cast as a WASP and how writing team sarcastically named this character Christian White until someone noticed.  Ellison's disparaging comments about Hollywood gossip shows such as Rhona Barret address the irrelevance of such programming.  This commentary is just as relevant today and would be apparent to anyone who has watched a recent episode of "Entertainment tonight".  
The columns were highly regarded enough for a publisher to roll them into paperbacks which were reprinted several times in the 1970s and again in 1983.  Amazon enumerates twenty-eight books that cite The Glass Teat.  Looking over the list I see that some of these are cites from more scholarly publications about that era of television and media.   Qwy47 (talk) 00:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have read both The Glass Teat and The Other Glass Teat 

message: This article manages to avoid mentioning when the book was actually  published. 70.73.90.119 (talk) 15:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication date?

message: Was this book ever released under another title? Seem to recall seeing the book with the title "The Boob Tube" in the late 1970s, but then that might memory translating. pbannister (talk) 02:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Boob Tube?