lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of references to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis in popular culture

message: The informal standard for articles about pop-culture references seems to be (Original article name) in popular culture  - it seems like following this standard might make it easier for anyone looking for this page. PaladinWhite 23:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already done that several months ago. Bryan Seecrets 04:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose a name-change to ''Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis in popular culture''
Talk:Paradise Beach

message: Some of the characters e.g. Hayden, Barsby, Ritchie & McDermott were named after Queensland Sheffield Shield cricketers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.215.205 (talk) 11:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed odd and iffy info about real people as per Wikipedia policy. Anything unsourced and doubtful has to go right away. Lots42 (talk) 08:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info removed
Talk:Super Computer

message: As the Klingon name stands, it doesn't make sense. See Klingon_language#Phonology. 168.254.226.142 12:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it may not make sense, but that's what it was in the episode. —Zachary talk 12:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The name does make sense, as stated by K'Rahk P'larrrrr in Star Trek Novel #4982: The War of the Klingons and the Romulans in System Groknar Polim XVIII. MGlosenger 23:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh. 

message: I've added a link to Supercomputer (disambiguation) at the top of the article, in case someone came here searching for Supercomputer.  -- JSBillings 22:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation link
Talk:Blah Blah Blah (TV series)

message: I'm Mr. Burns, blah blah blah!  Do this, do that, blah blah blah!  I think I'm so big, blah blah blah!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.128.172.131 (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ahahahaha--71.101.33.94 (talk) 05:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Clairemont, San Diego

message: I looked up Kearny Mesa, and its population was listed. Since there's very little residential area in Kearny Mesa, I was curious to compare it to a neighbor of similar geographic size with a high population; Clairemont. But this data is not listed, and I wasn't able to find it. Anybody? Verminjerky (talk) 11:21, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: I realize that this is a picture furnished by the historical society. It is essentiallyh unlabeled. We don't know if they were having an open house or what. Coming back from church maybe? How about a picture of a street with palms? Something attractive. This is just uninteresting.Student7 (talk) 12:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of guys standing around a board

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alta Vista, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Pacific Highlands Ranch, San Diego

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Otay Mesa, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 20:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Otay Mesa, San Diego which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Torrey Hills, San Diego

message: It is quoted in the article "In 1979 when Carmel Valley was being planned, the city had conducted studies on the Los Peñasquitos Canyon Preserve as an open space park."  I am working on correcting the disambiguity of open space and need to figure out what type of open space does this park fit: 1) Open space reserve, areas of protected or conserved land on which development is indefinitely set aside. 2)Urban open space, urban areas of protected or conserved land on which development is indefinitely set aside. 3)Greenway, a linear chain of open space reserves or a recreational corridor through the same. Or 4)Public space, areas left open for the use of the public, such as a piazza, plaza, park, and courtyard.  If someone more familiar with the area can help out it would be profoundly appreciated! Cheers, Joshfinnie (talk) 22:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of Open Space Park 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Otay Mesa, San Diego which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Nokia 3100

message: Why was the 3120 classic page removed? There is now no information about that phone on Wikipedia.
this articles needs some serious gramatical correction - Anonymous
It should also mention which three GSM bands the phone can use. AndrewBall 01:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Why does nokia 3120 redirect here im pretty sure it's a completley different phone 58.110.246.61 (talk) 12:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Torrey Pines, San Diego

message: Please see Pacific Highlands Ranch, San Diego, California for a similar discussion based on similar conflicts during April 2007. 76.175.69.109 05:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk discussion

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:San Ysidro, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Carmel Mountain Ranch, San Diego

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Allied Gardens, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Scottsdale Gun Club

message: Statistically, the Scottsdale Gun Club is the largest indoor range open to the public in the world as stated by the National Rifle Association.  I am locating all of the referring materials as we speak.  My intention was not "blatant advertising" but to enrich the somewhat meager content available about shooting ranges, and the Scottsdale Gun Club is the best example of this.  This is my first venture into adding content into Wikipedia, so I may not have been going about this the right way. Scottsdalegunclub 23:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: what does that mean? Bobanny 07:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The lead para is now nicely sourced. I have cleaned up some of the more questionable parts. What it needs now is wikifying and the finding of a review article to source the main elements of the descriptions in the main two sections. TerriersFan 03:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Next steps
Category talk:National Hockey League officials

message: Add Marcus Vinnerborg here please. --89.166.100.173 (talk) 08:35, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm going to go through the "List of NHL On-Ice Officials" page and will be adding this category in pages that don't have this. If you think this is a problem, let me know. Mandoli (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. I think we've got them all. Mandoli (talk) 05:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding names 

message: I know this sounds like a stretch, but the NHL's Guide and Record Book lists St. Laurent under S instead of L. Is it just Wikipedia's way of ordering his name so it falls under L, or would S be appropriate? Mandoli (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of names
Talk:Carl Shapiro

message: This article is about Carl Shapiro (b1955) who is a university professor. The article had arbitrarily been replaced with some incomplete information about a totally different Carl Shapiro. If you want to start a new article about someone with the same name as that of an existing article, then you need to create a new entry altogether, and also provide the appropriate disambiguation page.82.29.215.181 (talk) 10:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Welsh independence

message: Owain Glyndŵr used 'Y Ddraig Aur' (The golden dragon) in his campaign for Welsh independence from English rule, it is possibly the most important symbol representing Welsh independence, more-so than the four lion does.. as the lions represented Owain himself.. where-as the dragon represented his people. I have added the dragon to the article (however I'm not expecting it to stay long as I'm sure there will be someone displeased with it being added).. I'm not looking for an in-depth argument, however I would encourage editors to reply to this section with a 'keep' or 'leave out' so that democracy can be achieved. Hogyncymru (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Hogyncymru If you can add some good references to the image caption then it should stay.  Titus Gold (talk) 13:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Keep. It does 'symbolise' Welsh Independence and the article is called Welsh independence. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 11:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it not also get confused with the golden wyvern/dragon of 143.159.205.142 (talk) 05:02, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owain Glyndŵr's Gold dragon flag inclusion 

message: Please add a suitable mention of the new report published today:
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/welsh-independence-viable-devolution-collapse-28464093
https://news.sky.com/story/welsh-independence-viable-but-most-uncertain-option-for-waless-future-report-finds-13050418
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-67949443
Thanks Titus Gold (talk) 15:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constitutional Commission update needed
Talk:National unity government

message: this article gives some examples of national governments, but never gets around to explaining precisely what that means. if i had any idea, i would. --dan (talk) 01:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's only because, about a month ago, someone apparently deleted the intro to the article (without any explanation) and nobody noticed it.  I am going to restore it now.  The explanatory intro (with its disambiguation line) is especially important to those of us in the United States, where the term "National government" would never be understood to mean what it means in this article.  6SJ7 (talk) 05:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  step one: define your terms 

message: nyone know  3 facts about Local, State, and National Governments?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.214.197.59 (talk) 06:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 facts about Local, State, and National Government 

message: The term "national government" is inherently ambiguous, and since "national unity government" is used regularly in the press (eg re: Zimbabwe) as a consise but clear term, I would suggest that this article be renamed as such. Chalky (talk) 08:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose to rename this page 

message: How is it a national unity government if it only passed by a single vote? My understanding from the article is that a national unity government requires all parties to be involved, which would presumably require a unanimous (?) vote. Forgive me if I'm wrong, I don't live in a parliamentary democracy. Owlblocks (talk) 19:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  36 Government of Israel
Talk:Soda

message: Since most North America English readers call a 'soft drink' just 'soda' (or pop, or sodapop), I'd think lots of people come to this page expecting 'Soda' as they know it. I just did. Then to actually find the 'soda' page, which seems to be named 'soft drink' (which if I've heard spoken in a real life situation I can't recall it), then to dig deep into the page and section that it's in (I've moved it to first item in the section from the last item, will see if that's okay) and finally found out where to find 'Soda'. That's my only reason for asking if the link can at least be first-lined, seems like a lot of extra searching a common term in a large part of the English reading world. The common name chemical meanings come right after the first line, so all the very common terms would be handled quickly. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think having a common meanings area as supported by MOS:DABCOMMON would be good here. Here's the relevant page views for consideration. I don't know enough about how widely used just "soda" is for the chemicals to decide what should be included, as we don't use it that way in the US. -- Fyrael (talk) 15:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to 'soft drink' in first line?
Talk:Grantville, San Diego

message: Um... has the editor of this page ever BEEN to Grantville?  There are so many restaurants, it's not even funny. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.205.107.70 (talk) 04:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restaurants 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:El Cerrito, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:San Carlos, San Diego

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Navajo, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Change spelling 2600:1700:FF80:F6B0:71E1:C611:1C4E:DF2 (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dailard Elementary School is misspelled
Talk:11 Downing Street

message: According to the Reuters and BBC references listed at Talk:Chief_Mouser_to_the_Cabinet_Office, Gordon Brown is now living at 11 Downing Street, and Alistair Darling at 10 Downing Street, but this article disagrees.  Could someone with some actual knowledge of British government residences (or at least a better grasp of what sources are reliable in this area) please check on this and correct whichever articles need correcting? John Darrow (talk) 04:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling?

message: Request received to merge articles: Cash for curtains disputed allegations into 11 Downing Street; dated: May 2021. Proposer's Rationale: Small amount of readable prose, could be reduced down to a paragraph or two on a dedicated section on the target page. Discuss here. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 22:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep Independently meets WP:GNG. Range of coverage in all British broadsheets and some international outlets. An Electoral Commission inquiry into the conduct of a Prime Minister regardless of outcome would appear to be notable. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 20:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Serra Mesa, San Diego

message: Needs more wiki. --GranTurismo2 21:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Otay Mesa, San Diego which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Paul Kollsman

message: +At the top of the article it says that Paul Kollsman was born in 1900. At the bottom, it says that you can look him up under 1910 births. Which one is it? — 64.20.170.254 00:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth conflict 

message: Obvious major POV issue here, with "in what can only be described as an act of cultural vandalism..." — 75.83.69.196 (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The simplest fix was to remove the WP:NPOV phrase. — JoeSperrazza (talk) 05:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

text: The facts are verifiable, so the statement could be left in the article, with appropriate supporting references.  See the comment written by "A. Disgusted Citizen" in October 2011 at https://paradiseleased.wordpress.com/2011/09/05/lost-hollywood-the-enchanted-hill-of-fred-thomson-and-frances-marion/. It is clear that Paul Allen and his lawyers are pigs; calling them cultural vandals is rather mild.  The only ones to gain by having the information suppressed are Mr. Allen and the people he paid to do his dirty work.  Might one of those people been the anonymous IP editor, above? — QuicksilverT @ 22:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: The Persondata template contained an incorrect date of death, March 17, 1982, conflicting with the September 26, 1982 date shown in the Infobox, and the article said he died in Beverly Hills.  I found a New York Times obituary article, dated Wednesday, September 29, 1982, that states Paul Kollsman "died Sunday", making the date September 26, 1982.  It also says that he died at "Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles".  The incorrect death date may have been copied from the German Wikipedia article, where it is still incorrect as of today.  The article also made no mention of the death of his first wife in 1951, or that he remarried and was survived by his second wife, Eva.  I tried confirming the birth and death dates via the Social Security Death Index, but it contained no entry for a "Paul Kollsman" dying in California in the range 1981-1982.  This isn't all that unusual, as Social Security participation is, in theory, a "voluntary" program, and some people of means like Paul Kollsman probably never "volunteered" themselves into subjugation upon the advice of astute legal counsel.  Another possibility is that his death was never formally reported and recorded in the Social Security database. — QuicksilverT @ 21:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors of fact
Talk:Argument from queerness

message: Any sui generis entity is of necessity "utterly different from anything else in the universe". Doubting something because it is sui generis is, itself, absurd, since everything in the universe can be divided into groups which are sui generis. The logical result of this argument from queerness is that everything is queer. That is a reductio ad absurdum. --70.131.60.45 (talk) 09:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Mackie's argument is an inductive argument that suggests moral properties would have to be so unlike anything we have reason to believe exists in the universe that we should not believe in them.  He is quite explicit about the fact that his position rests on metaphysical naturalism and believes that if God existed, this could change things.  If one wishes to bite the bullet and admit—as Korsgaard does—that moral properties would be queer in this way, I take it that Mackie would simply say, "fine, but so much the worse for your theory."  Postmodern Beatnik (talk) 03:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

text: You may disagree with the argument.  That doesn't mean the argument is not notable.  Show some quality academic sourcing which says it's a reductio and put it in the article with that as citation. 142.157.61.6 (talk) 20:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is more a logical fallacy than an argument. 
Talk:Gambia International Airlines

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. eviolite (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Template talk:Nonspecific

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Inline templates.  I've been meaning to do this for a while. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Wikiproject Inline templates'' proposed

message: What I wanted (knew had existed and thought I'd found only to discover it has been changed by the G&G of wikiworld) is the non-verifiable inline tag.  In machine language of course there is virtually (sic) no such thing as non-verifiability merely existence of the fact that something has TO THAT DATE not been verified (another example of gobble-de-geek?).  
However, my situation is that a citation (to a printed trade catalogue unavailable to "most" people, having been out of print for at least 40 years) is EFFECTIVERLY unverifiable and I find I am unable to note this!!  My ONLY options are either to delete the citation and the claim it refers to (which is also "dubious" - or in common parlance: incorrect) or resort to a patchwork of inline tags.  
What is going on with the amalgamation merge and bloat that wiki is obdurately engaged in?!?!?  Is there nobody with some sanity to guide the good ship .... hello .... ok, dumb question! 
Once more I ask myself what is the point in trying to improve wiki i.e keep it to its guiding principles (as intelligently interpreted by human reasoning) if wiki itself is set on a becoming a Boy's Own Manual of Captain America's exploits?  Bah humbug.  I want to pay wiki back for the role it has in my work but what is the point if 100 times as many people delight in destroying its very structural integrity?  Again, rhetorical questions shouted into the storm.
LookingGlass (talk) 06:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More frustration!!! 

message: Please see discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Inline_Templates#Redefine_.22nonspecific.22.3F Eperoton (talk) 01:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redefine?
Talk:Impregnation fetish

message: This article does not reference or cite its sources. Is this article solely original research? I have no reason to believe otherwise, and I will get around to nominating it for deletion. Lotusduck 00:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do have the time to look for sources but I don't have the sources. The article is original research so I want to get rid of it in accordance with policy, but to rewrite it in accordance with policy I would need published articles.
According to the article as it is, Impregnation Fetish is a kind of fetish for unsafe sex. If the article isn't deleted, would it not be better re-written and merged into unprotected sex?Lotusduck 05:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion