lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Invicta (company)

message: Hello Northamerica1000 -- This article has lain about unreferenced for years.  To deserve inclusion in WP it needs to demonstrate notability by secondary sources.  Perhaps there is a reason why no one has added anything.  Passing references like this  don't count. If we are going to reject articles about Silicon Valley startups and other small businesses, the same standards need to apply to articles that have been here since 2006. Fair is fair.
I am tempted just to tag it AfD, so we get some more eyeballs on it. What do you think? Rhadow (talk) 12:57, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Do what you want to do. I deprodded because a lack of sources does not necessarily equate with a lack of notability. North America1000 13:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

text: I added some sources. A company founded in 1906 likely has some offline sources available in libraries. North America1000 13:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Investment AB Latour

message: The second sentence needs a verb.  This is a stub, but we still need complete sentences.  Rags (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Or maybe I'm reading it wrong?  Inter alia = among others, correct?  So, is "controls" the verb?  Oops.  I was reading "Douglas Controls" as a company name.  My bad.  Rags (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete sentence
Talk:Investec

message: Not sure whether these should be merged or just cross-referenced, but there's mention in this article of the NCB Group, which was taken over by Investec in 2013. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I feel it doen't get as much attention as it deserves. The remarkable work that they're doing every weekend in that school is extraordinary. The food is trash tho Saq Madik (talk) 15:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kutlwanong?
Talk:Invercargill Licensing Trust

message: Why are there apparently contradictory figures of $3m and $10m within this page? What are the sources of those figures? (I can see the latter is from http://www.ilt.co.nz/ as the paragraph that contains it is copied verbatim from that page!) I don't know enough about the ILT or other sources to be able to adequately correct this, but it clearly needs it! 139.80.40.196 (talk) 00:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarified now - sorry it took a while! Snori (talk) 23:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the distinction is important - ILT commercial profits would normally go to a private owner, whereas the gaming profits have to go back to the community, no matter who owns/runs the machines. (I suspect that the payout is somewhat better because the ILT runs them of course.) Snori (talk) 00:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Junkers G 24

message: Removed two pictures from the Junkers G 24 page. They are labeled as showing the Junkers G 24 by the Bundesarchiv (German Federal Archive). However they clearly show the Junkers G 31. I put another Bundesarchiv photo on the page instead, which really shows the G 24. --Tdaddato (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Images 

message: Actualy I think the Greek G24 (about 4 of them) flew for the civilian Greek Company for Air Transport (Ελληνική Εταιρεία Εναερίων Συγκοινωνιών) and the the Greek Air Force.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.177.37.221 (talk) 17:33, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Users-Greece
Talk:International Register of Shipping

message: sdfghjkkfjgsjkhlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlraeiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadjjjjjjjjlassssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssghfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.79.50 (talk) 15:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:International Rectifier

message: The company's founder has died.
http://www.electronicsnews.com.au/news/rip-eric-lidow Article at Electronics News]0-%3E%2025/01/2013%2011:48:32%20AM
103.4.124.12 (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eric Lidow
Talk:ABC Family Worldwide

message: per Califorina business search as of 1/13/2016, ABC Family Worldwide, Inc (Entity Number: C1991622) is still its legal name.. Spshu (talk) 00:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Bloomberg also lists the company as "ABC Family Worldwide" as of 1/22/2016. –Dark Cocoa Frosting (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Freeform WW v. ABC Family WW

message: :ABC Family Worldwide →  - Since January 2016, the company has been renamed to "Freeform Worldwide", so the page name should be moved to the new name. 101blazertrail (talk) 03:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABC Family Worldwide → Freeform Worldwide 

message: some of the assets which have been owned by Marvel had been owned by Disney long before the merger because 10 years before the merger Disney acquired the assets of Marvel but Fox still owned some of the assets like the Fantastic Four and X-Men 2603:6000:D000:2:75B3:7874:D869:2006 (talk) 02:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  some of the assets may have been owned by Disney before the merger 

message: Because ABC Family changed their name to Freeform, "ABC Family Worldwide" should stay as "Freeform Group". FlapjackRulez (talk) 18:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The channel was renamed to "Freeform" but there's no evidence the subsidiary behind it was renamed to "Freeform Group" as well. Do you have any reliable sources confirming that?— Starforce13 19:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebrand to Freeform Group
Talk:Mrindangam

message: No specific reason whas given ("What Wikipedia is not" doesn't tell us what you specific objections are), and no discussion was begun here or elsewhere.  I'm removing the nom for deletion warning from the page.  If whomever added it would still like to do this, please give reasons, and add it to the proposal of deletion discussions.T L Miles 13:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for deletion? 

message: 36.89.190.141 (talk) 12:10, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you're asking for; WP:REQ is for requesting new articles. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting editing and publishing
Talk:Instaphone

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Insight Enterprises

message: It is unclear from the phrasing whether "computers without legal licenses" are something they also sold their
customers, or a problem they found in-house, and whether those licenses were software licenses or otherwise.
The transition from there to the end of the sentence needs help as well.
xanthian@well.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xanthian (talk • contribs) 11:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  query to original author 

message: This entry needs updates to get it in the standard format for public companies. 
Going to add a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_Company shortly  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newfingers (talk • contribs) 08:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: Please make the changes to the
Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: NSIT) headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, is a global technology provider of hardware, software and service solutions(mobility & point of sale, office productivity, unified communications & collaboration, network & security, data center, virtualization, data protection and cloud) to business and government clients in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific.
Founded in 1988, Insight has more than 5,300 teammates (employees) worldwide, operations in 23 countries and serves clients in 191 countries through its industry certifications and manufacturer partnerships. The Company is ranked number 460 on Fortune magazine’s 2012 Fortune 500 list.[1] Insight's initial public offering (IPO) was in 1995. [2]
Acquisitions2002: Acquired Comark. Increases Insight’s presence in the public sector market.
2006: Acquired Software Spectrum. Inc. Provides Insight with a global software footprint.
2008: Acquired Calence LLC. Adds networking solutions, advanced communications and managed services to Insight’s portfolio.
2008: Acquired Minx (U.K.). Insight secures Cisco Gold status in the U.K. and increases global presence.
2011: Acquired Ensynch. Boosts Insight’s IT services with added cloud and virtualization capabilities.
2012: Acquired Inmac (U.K.). Expands Insight’s hardware capabilities in Europe.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuck.king (talk • contribs) 16:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Company Information--Please Update 
Talk:InPhase Technologies

message: Is it necessary to keep this in the article? Why put in content that you know isn't sourced? When you do a search on this topic you only get 1 and that's from the company itself. I don't think it's useful having a source from the same company that made several promises and fell apart.
Can this be sourced from a reputable standards organization?Woods01 (talk) 06:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1 terabyte benchmark 

message: is they out of busness, they auctioned off loads of stuff https://hgpauction.auctionflex.com/showlots.ap?co=56936&weid=19244&weiid=7950643&archive=y&lso=lotnumasc&pagenum=1&lang=En  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.76.252.185 (talk) 20:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auction 

message: Signal Lake Venture Capital is apparently backing a start-up called hVault Holographic Storage Systems.  I think they're based in Beaverton or Hillsboro, Oregon; it's hard to tell.  Their Web site gives very little information, except for an Area Code 503 telephone number and a Web contact form.  Having control of InPhase, Signal Lake is apparently funneling the InPhase designs to hVault.  hVault exhibited at the 2012 NAB show in Las Vegas, Nevada and claims it will ship holographic storage systems before the middle of 2012.  The InPhase article might be updated with relevant material in this vein as more information gradually becomes available. — QuicksilverT @ 01:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  hVault
Talk:Inokom

message: Hope the alterations I have made are sufficient to have the tile "This article reads like a news release" removed from the top of the article. Belmonter (talk) 22:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff
Talk:Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002

message: Suggest the article be updated to recognize: the new Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.133.13.1 (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

message: I think that while there is significant discussion about why the act fails to address needs, I think that the characterization of the act as "fundamentally flawed" is a statement of opinion, not factual, and as a result, the article contains a basic bias inappropriate to Wiki.
I recommend that we add "has been characterized as" to the "fatally flawed" comment in the introduction. This would encourage the reader to review the "Issues with FISMA" section.
Thoughts?
[Bruce Brody here -- I think the ultimate justification of the "fatally flawed" point is that the staffs of Sen. Carper and Sen. McCain, both of whom are on the Senate Homeland Security Committee, have concluded that change is necessary and a new FISMA is coming.  Having worked with both staffs, all I can say at this point is that the "fatal flaws" are being addressed.  But it's no longer relevant to debate whether or not FISMA was "faally flawed" because Congress is fixing the "fatal flaws".]
Bdevoe 18:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fatally Flawed"?
Talk:Inktomi

message: If Inktomi is out of business, why is their spyder still crawling the net, looking at every page? -69.87.204.151 22:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spyder still crawling the net 
Talk:Ingram Content Group

message: What does POD stand for?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.117.138 (talk) 03:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: POD = Print-on-demand. Ozaru (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Ingram Book Group → Ingram Content Group — Company merger created new name for Ingram Book Group. Sherriemurray (talk) 17:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't see any reason why not. It's their new name. Peridon (talk) 18:56, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Drmies (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: The article needs to be updated to include e.g. IngramSpark, eBooks, Espresso, the Global Connect network, and possibly also references to POD competitors (or add a category), and the various distributors they work with. Ozaru (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacking recent info 

message: In order to know who to write to, to make them aware that my book has been uploaded to 50,000 retail booksellers databases by Ingram, from my book published by the FriesenPress arm in Canada, how do I find out who are the top 5, say, of the retail booksellers Ingram uploaded my book to their databases, in each significant potential market for my book sales, including the USA, Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand - as FriesenPress say they don't have that information?  Please be kind enough to reply to:  RGDoddsAuthor@gmail.com   Posted: 12.05.21 172.125.172.112 (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingrams book distribution
Talk:Arla Oy

message: Åhus Glass is a subsidiary of Ingman.  Both are stubs, and this would make more since until the article can be developed further. GregJackP (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While it is currently a subsidiary, it was a separate company 1950-2002. I belive it stands on its own on these historical merits, so  in my opinion, the Swedish ice cream manufacturer/ice cream brand and the Finnish dairy company could remain separate articles. Tomas e (talk) 19:27, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Infitec

message: There seem to be two articles here. One for the company "Infitec GmbH", and one for the technology "Infitec". Right now this article is more about the company, but I suspect 90% of the people looking at an article on "Infitec" will be looking for information about the technology.
I must suggest information on the company should be moved to a new "Infitec GmbH" article.
Then there is the article titled "Dolby 3D" which is the primary US-brand for Infitec technology. 06:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schizophrenic Article 

message: First: my name is Dr. Klaus Rohwer and I am an employee of INFITEC GmbH (senior scientist). I just edited the article on this company to make it more complete. But I did not find an article on the INFITEC technology. I would like to add such an article - am I allowed to do so? Klausrohwer (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for you interest in improving Wikipedia.  While your assistance is appreciated, Wikipedia has a policy of discouraging edits by people financially connected with the subject of the article.  This conflict of interest policy, abbreviated as WP:COI is intended to ensure that articles are unbiased.  While it may seem counterintuitive, since after all who knows a company better than an employee, it's also unlikely that you would include anything controversial or that which would put your company or technology in a bad light, and because of that the article's neutrality would be called into question.  If you have material (or an article) you'd like to add, you can create a draft in your soapbox, and I can review it and add it myself if I can verify the information.  I'll add this page to my watchlist in case you decide to respond, and you can also leave a note in my talk page User talk:Timtempleton.  Another point I'd like to make - you included a personal conversation as a source, but since that is unverifiable, it can't be used.  Otherwise, anyone could put in anything and claim the person told them that it was true.  This has led to sometimes awkward issues, such as when author Philip Roth was unable to add truthful info to his own article because his identity and neutrality were questioned. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/sep/19/why-philip-roth-needs-secondary-source Plese feel free to reach out if you have any questions.  In the meantime, I'm going to edit this article a little and mark it as needing more sources.Timtempleton (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article on the INFITEC technology not found
Talk:Infinity Systems

message: Infinity made its bones in the mid-1970s using the Walsh omni-directional tweeter; they only went to EMITs after they lost their license.I see no mention of this in the entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.82.127.174 (talk) 01:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because this article is very incomplete, of course.  Someone with old hifi magazines could probably fill in some gaps. Huw Powell (talk) 20:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  tweeter 

message: "While not as elaborate or high end as previous Infinity efforts, they filled a popular consumer niche."  Infinity has always made reasonable speakers for ordinary people.  The outrageously expensive products provide more of a "halo" function than anything else. Huw Powell (talk) 20:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  high end versus consumer products 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Infinity (audio). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 25#Infinity (audio) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  64.229.90.53 (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Infinity (audio)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Ineos

message: I don't intend to stand up for Ineos, they are big and ugly enough to speak for themselves!  However, some of the information regarding the Unite dispute is a bit iffy.  It was estimated that the final salary pension scheme would cost £16M per annum to continue - should be remembered that this is the cost as of that specific day - if the returns on investments went down (as they have, significantly since that time) then the company would need to pump in a lot more than £16M.  I would also point out that saying that the Grangemouth facility makes "up to £3M a day" in profit is somewhat ambiguous.  Firstly "up to £3M" simply means "not more than £3M" which could mean that some days it actually makes a loss!  You would need to look at the actual annual profit and then take a view on how that is likely to progress over the next 20 years or so.  It is also not clear whether the "up to £3M profit" is gross margin, delivered margin or operating margin. It does make quite a difference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.198.33.252 (talk) 13:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Can anybody please explain this? Which one is the legal headquarters, which the operative headquarters? If I understand this right 'registered office' means the legal headquarters, right...?
193.192.244.44 (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Registered office' is not a headquarters per se but the address at which the ultimate holding company is registered.Rangoon11 (talk) 16:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head Office / Registered Office 

message: Recent articles and studies made by NGOs have revealed informations about INEOS.
Should it be included in this article ?
Examples among others : 
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/apr/03/ineos-leads-lobbying-effort-to-get-out-of-paying-green-tax
https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/insight/ineos-chequered-environmental-track-record-europe
https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/insight/chemical-billionaires-bid-fossil-fuel-empire-ineos-corporate-profile
There have also been articles on the links between Ineos and the Paradise Papers?
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15670165.Exposed__Ineos_links_to_Paradise_Papers_firm/
I have the feeling that this could be included in the article to make it more balanced.
--Tifeco76 (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Controversy about INEOS activities 

message: I think this tag refers to User talk:Chemicals are life.  As he/she has not edited the article since 9 Sep 2016, is it OK if I remove the tag? Mock wurzel soup (talk) 21:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest tag
Talk:Industria Aeronautică Română

message: Both articles deal with the same company (they even use the same picture of the facilities!)  One article talks more about the company in the 30s and 40s, the other more about the present-day company.  This should all be done in a single, unified article, which I think should be this one (with full name, not the abbreviation).  Turgidson 02:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur, feel free to merge them, as i'm sure nobody would disagree with this. --Eurocopter tigre 23:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I'll wait a few more days to be sure, and then, if no one speaks out otherwise, I'll be bold!  Turgidson 00:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[IAR SA]]

message: Weren't the Brasov facilities taken after the war by the UTB tractor factory? --Error (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UTB 

message: Zilele acestea, E-111, prototipul supersonic cu motor racheta al ARCA a primit numele oficial de I.A.R.-111. Spunea cineva pe net ca e primul avion romanesc din seria "Century". Sunt de acord.
These days, E-111, the supersonic rocket engine prototype of ARCA has received the official name I.A.R.-111. Someone on the Net was saying that is the first romanian aircraft from "Century Series". I agree. Bigshotnews 23:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I.A.R.-111 