Talk:Caryophyllene

message: It is possible that the structure drawn here on Wikipedia is incorrect. This has been discussed in detail on the ChemSpider Forum here: http://forum.chemspider.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=48--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 13:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't access the above link, but I notice that the given name matches the skeletal-diagram absolute stereochemistry (wedged vs dotted H at the ring fusion) in :File:Beta-Caryophyllen.svg dated 7 July 2008. On the other hand, the two ball&stick 3D diagrams (:File:Caryophyllene.png and :File:Caryophyllene2.png from January 2009) have the opposite configuration at those positions, so I removed them from the article. DMacks (talk) 13:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect structure 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Caryophyllene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100705122159/http://www.usp.org/fcc/FCC61SBallotResultsWebPostingReport01.html to http://www.usp.org/fcc/FCC61SBallotResultsWebPostingReport01.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Caryophyllene is one of the chemical compounds that contributes to the spiciness of black pepper.[7]"
The citation notwithstanding, whether this is true depends on how one defines "spiciness." To me, "spiciness" means "pungency" (spicy as in chili peppers). Having just deposited 1 milliliter of high-purity Beta-Caryophyllene onto my tongue, I can tell you that it is about as spicy as a banana. It also doesn't have a very spice-like aroma, although that could be argued. It smells/tastes to me more "woodsy," similar to the fragrance of cedar. I would suggest removing the statement that caryophyllene contributes to the spiciness of black pepper, because 
a) it doesn't have the (primary) black pepper spicy flavor,
b) it doesn't possess any spiciness (pungency) at all, and
c) the cited abstract does not say that it is spicy, either.
I suggest saying, instead, "Caryophyllene is one of the chemical compounds that contributes to the flavor profile of black pepper."
This would seem to be better supported by the cited source, and is consistent with my first-hand experience.
Phatgeek47 (talk) 20:31, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, although the source says "aroma". Revised with thanks. --Zefr (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questioning statement about spiciness