Talk:Ewood Park

message: There is an error in your first paragraph. You've stated that Anfield and Stamford Bridge were contructed before Bramall Lane. Although Sheffield United were formed in 1889, the stadium was there many years before the football club. Bramall Lane is offically the oldest proper sports stadium in the world as it was contructed in 1855. Cricket was played there during the 1850's and the first football match was played at Bramall Lane in 1862.(before the FA was formed).
I would like to add that Ewood park was not built in 1890, as stated in this article. The Ewood Park grounds were built in 1882 as a multi sports venues and operated successfully as such for eight years before Blackburn Rovers made the stadium their home. This fact is correctly stated in the Blackburn Rovers article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.22.20 (talk) 16:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date error

message: its a great shame that you should allow someone to post such a load of biased twaddle on wiki..the section on crowd trouble would be laughable if it wasn't so sad  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.8.142 (talk) 06:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the section, an opinionated personal essay like that has no place on Wikipedia. Oldelpaso (talk) 10:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ..and I've now been reverted. I shall ask the user in question to engage in discussion here. The material is uncited, and in clear violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Oldelpaso (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Aside from the bias in your writing, much of it has nothing to do with Ewood Park. The article is supposed to be about the stadium, not the club. Stay on topic. --Jameboy (talk) 00:42, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Again, i have just had to reinsert an entire article that has been deleted and by people who are not being truthful about why they are editing and what they are editing. In a way this works in my favour as I am going to request full protection on this article. You and others are clearly violating wiki policy. This article has come under intense vandalism over the past 24 hrs, this is clearly no coincidence. People are either working together to vandalise the article or there are sockpuppets, which again would be a breach of wiki policy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DecZXZ (talk • contribs) 00:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Your input is not written from a factual base .. somehow you managed to get the year wrong of the infamous Ewood riot made several comments about the decline of your closest neighbours which has nothing at all to do with Ewood Park or crowd trouble in the slightest and have basically used an article about a football stadium to make a number of snide comments about other local clubs.Ten minuts research from someone with no knowledge of the topic would show them why your "work" should not be on wikipedia maybe you should stick to messageboards and such instead ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.8.142 (talk) 06:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Couple of things: first assume good faith; second, please read tl; dr - make your arguments concisely. – ukexpat (talk) 19:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality and points of view

message: I've been finding references for the current capacities of all of the championship grounds for the current seasons page.  I've found two conflicting numbers for what the actual capacity is. Sky reckon it is 31154 while the current reference reckons it's 31367.  I've found as many references for one as for the other but I'm tempted to treat sky as a more reliable source.  can anyone clarify what the actual capacity is? => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 18:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stadium Capacity 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Ewood Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090911091641/http://www.rovers.co.uk:80/page/HistoryRecords to http://www.rovers.co.uk/page/HistoryRecords
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ewood Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218104723/http://www.footballgroundguide.com/blackburn_rovers/ewood_park.htm to http://www.footballgroundguide.com/blackburn_rovers/ewood_park.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rovers.co.uk/page/HistoryRecords
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ewood Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091025202609/http://pastscape.english-heritage.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=887115 to http://pastscape.english-heritage.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=887115
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091025202609/http://pastscape.english-heritage.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=887115 to http://pastscape.english-heritage.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=887115
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified