Talk:Twenty:20 (film)

message: I have reviewed this article per a request at WP:FILMS' assessment department. I made various changes throughout the article (mostly removing contractions in the plot section). After reading the article, I found a few things that need to be worked on before it can reach B class.
*Italicize the title in the intro as well as the other occurrences within the article.
*The flag in the infobox needs to be removed. This is a result of past discussion about its inclusion.
*In the production section, there is a single sentence by itself. To improve the flow of the article it shouldn't stand by itself. Instead incorporate it into the prior paragraph or expand on it.
*Consider reducing the length of the cast. If some of the characters aren't that notable consider removing them. If they are all vital, try using columns to reduce the size of the section. Also consider mentioning more details about each character instead of just listing the name. This isn't a requirement, but will give more information on each character. Look to other GA/FAs for examples.
*The controversies section should all be converted to prose. Instead of using a list, just break it up with different paragraphs.
*The audio release section needs sources for the present information. Also for the heading, make sure that release is lower-cased (Audio release).
*In the reception section, the quotes don't need to be in italic font.
*All inline citations need to go directly after the punctuation (ex. "She sat by the dog.[1]" not " by the dog. [1]" or "by the dog[1]."). Make sure to fix all occurrences within the article.
*The inline citations need to use the citation templates or use better formatting instead of using just the url.
*:File:Twenty20poster.jpg needs to have the source of where the image was found listed on the image's page.
*Keep branching out to find more sources. Look in archives on Google and use a library database if possible. If you need further assistance ask for help at WP:FILMS, as there are usually a few editors that have access to various sources to help you out.
Good job working on the article so far, and I hope that after implementing the above suggestions, the article will ready to reach B class. Once you have addressed the suggestions, have an editor or two take a look at the article to give it a good copyedit. If you have any further questions on the review or above suggestions, please let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 06:49, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went through the article and fixed some minor errors and grammar issues. In order for it to reach B, it still needs a few more things. The inline citations need more parameters including the author who wrote the article, date it was released, the newspaper/magazine/site that released it, and the access date the site was last accessed. Showing just the title of the website/link isn't sufficient. Take a look at some current GA/FAs for examples. If you need help with formatting let me know. For the cast section, consider using two columns without the table so that it doesn't take up so much of the article (there's a lot of white space on the side). For the reception section add a few reviews that may have been negative. This will prevent the section from appearing POV. The article still could use another copyedit, so try to get another editor or two to take a look. Once you have addressed these issues, let me know on my talk page and I'll give it another look. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've assessed it as B-class. Add a citation for the budget in the infobox and see if there are any more relevant categories that can be added. If you wish to pursue GA, I'd recommend expanding the plot more (add more details), look for any more content that is available (maybe see if the DVD has anything), and find someone to copyedit it. You could always take it to the Indian task force and see if anyone can help out. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:FILMS B class assessment

message: The article is reassessed to B-class, as it abides by the guidelines for B-class articles in the project. Also, WP: Films have reassessed it to B-class.--Anoopkn (talk) 08:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP India (Kerala workgroup) reassessment

message: The casting table entry for the Malayalam Actor Baburaj points to a wiki page for a music composer with the same name. Request correction or attention. Sanjit Nair (talk) 20:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Link Error in Casting. 

message: Can some one care to add a spoiler warning before the Plot section of the movie?? I think it's required.Sanjit Nair (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As per guidelines in Wikipedia:Spoiler, having a spoiler warning is not encouraged, as wikipedia is an encylopedia, the information is supposed to be covered in detail.--Anoopkn (talk) 12:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Thank you for the clarification.Sanjit Nair (talk) 20:51, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler Warning Missing. 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:TwentyTwenty.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support Confusing on first glance, redirect so there's no ambiguity. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:48, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Request to add an image in the Music section of film article Twenty:20 (film) because, there is already a space for adding a cover image and it's empty and there is an official cover/poster of the film in wikipedia. The image is reliably sourced and fully licensed. Thanks.
:File:Twenty20poster.jpg
27.97.211.82 (talk) 15:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonderful, edit warring by proxy. Stickee (talk) 00:54, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2014 

message: Mammootty is the seniormost and he should come first in the cast. Mubthasim (talk) 14:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong for whom? Mammootty fans? Cast is not arranged according to "age", if that is the case then Madhu is the most senior. What happened to your so called seniority in these cases - ,. It proves you are biased. Wikipedia is not here to push your agenda. 137.97.101.58 (talk) 07:16, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong mentioning of cast 

message: Hi, You know Mammootty and Mohanlal are equally popular & rival actors in Malayalam Film Industry. Both actors are equally important in the movie, So we have to consider other aspect like age, experience, spells. In any manner, there shouldn't be any chance for Mohanlal to be placed above Mammootty. On the basis of age, career experience & considering their english spelling, Mohanlal only comes after Mammootty. Then on what basis admins are keeping the wrong order and reverting other edits. This is not fair. Expecting an answer. Thnaks in advance. SmakTwone (talk) 19:51, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Arrangement in the cast. 

message: Hi  Hammersoft  After talking with the admins in the help desk, i came to know that, the casts are arranged in the billing order. Means Accordingly how the producer chosen it. So from the movie's post credit scene itself,  we can understand there should be some rearrangement to be made. You can watch it here : []. So I believe you guys should do proper rearrangement as per in the billing order or producers wish. SmakTwone (talk) 05:14, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not about fandom. You guys are not giving a proper reason for the current arrangements. On what basis the current arrangement was done. Earlier i thought names are arranged based on alphabetical order when things between them goes similar. But after talking with an admin in help desk, they said currently cast are arranged based only on billing order(i.e as per producer's wish). So I checked the end credit of the film and the order is not same as in the current article. Atleast just give me the criteria of the current arrangement. Seriously this not fair. SmakTwone (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * You have been given a proper reason. They are in billing order. End credits are not billing. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * SmakTwone, your plea "Seriously this not fair" suggests that you have a very strong emotional attachment to this issue, which makes you inherently biased in favour of a particular outcome, and thus, somewhat unsuitable for an objective discussion about this. And for all we know, there could be multiple versions of the film, one with Mammootty billed first in regions where he might be more popular and one where Mohanlal was billed first in regions where he might be more popular. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * Adding on; SwakTwone, you said that both are "equally important role"; if that's the case, then why should it matter in what order they are billed? --Hammersoft (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *  What are talking man? Now I doubt you guys are protecting something for someone. After this whole talk you still failed to show me the proof as I did along with my argument. I strongly believe wikipedia isn't working based on intuitions. From my best knowledge there is no multiple credit scene for the movie. If do, just show me the proof. I though for keeping the current arrangement from edit you guys definetily need to have a strong proof. Just show me that. This talk won't be this long if you guys have showed me earlier. It feels like you are opposing me to keep this.  If end credit is not the billing. Then give me the correct one. When i started this talk I am not at all serious. But when i realised you guys are just defending me/my request without a single solid evidence, I am forced to continue the talk. And to your add on questing. I just want to know how this cast arrangement was done according to wiki rules. Just give me the proof of your arguments in the billing order. I have given a proper proof and you are opposing me. So then Give me a stronger proof. That's all. SmakTwone (talk) 03:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * Proof has been provided to you, but you've chosen to ignore it. Here's another one; the listing on Amazon. Now, you are accusing us of having nefarious purposes in "protecting something or someone". This conversation is no longer productive. If you feel you have a case to make despite the evidence that's been provided to you, if you feel that we are obstructing you in applying your great evidence, then please avail yourself of Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Thank you, and have a great day. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rearrange cast in billing order 

message: Admin, This is not a matter of fanism but the original cast line of the movie is Madhu, Mammootty, Mohanlal, Suresh gopi. I have the most valid proof with me and it is movie itself.Sir,please dont be biased because the truth is just under your finger tips.The movie has only one version and here please watch it from Mxplayer.Cast line:2.42.50 to 2.43.15Fantastic videos from MXPlayer [[[Twenty:20] https://www.mxplayer.in/movie/watch-twenty-twenty-movie-online-a971f4d900cbf36e12b1f4dc47192d1f?utm_source=mx_android_share]] Keralacinelovers Media (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I could see it, but can't read Malayalam. Keralacinelovers Media, arguing over which of these people should be credited first is an entirely fruitless passion, and has been a needlessly disruptive subject across many articles. If I were you, I'd drop the stick on this. Nobody's going to die if the English Wikipedia has the wrong actor listed first. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * These edits, given the above, aren't surprising . It's a curious thing that legions of fans insist on trying to change the order of these actors to either side. This has been going on for many years now (almost six years) and shows no sign of abating. Both actors are successful. Both actors are millionaires. Both actors have won many awards. Why does it matter so much? Are their lives going to somehow be negatively affected if one or the other is placed first on a cast listing on Wikipedia? What's behind this?  can you shed light on this? Just help us understand why who comes first is so important? --Hammersoft (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

text: *  You might be able to use the titles of their articles on Malayalam; ml:മമ്മൂട്ടി (Mammootty) and ml:മോഹൻലാൽ (Mohanlal), and visually compare the Malayalam text against what you see on the opening credits. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * I'll take a look, but the geniuses who produced the film put all the credits at the front, even for mundane stuff like sound mixing and art, so it might be more time than I'm willing to invest on something so trivial. And for a little extra trivia about these two actors, the film Harikrishnans was produced with two sets of credits, one with Mohanlal first and one with Mammootty first, to be released in the various regions where one is more popular than the other. Yeah. This is such an ongoing pain that I am wondering if we shouldn't just do an RfC somewhere and come up with a way to figure out who should get credited first. Like, count the number of characters in the film's title and if it's odd, Mohanlal is first, and if it's even, the other guy. But of course then someone would come by and argue that the transliteration of Harikrishnans should actually be Haarikrishnans or something, just so they could win. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * Well then being able to confirm what Keralacinelovers Media says is on the version above is rather pointless, as it could be listed in the opposite order on another release. Uhg. I doubt an RfC would help. I don't think there's any reasonable metric that can positively prove one actor should be listed first above another in any given movie, and any arbitrary method will have a very hard time gaining approval. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast line provided is not matching with original movie 

message: No change needs to be made. Just wanted to show what end credits actually said. (None of the cast is listed in intro credits.) The cast order in the end is very weird to say the least (Madhu is credited first, then Mammootty, then Mohanlal). I support User:Cyphoidbomb's decision since Mohanlal had more prominence in the film. Mohanlal has more screentime despite being listed third in the credits.  End credits photo: . 
Fun Fact: the person listed first is somehow Madhu (veteran actor), not the other two people the other users were fighting about. DareshMohan (talk) 03:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: We're spinning around the same topic and saying the same things repeatedly. I'll revert to what I started with; either provide reliable, SECONDARY sources that support a particular cast order, or it's going to get reverted (and no I'm not suggesting I will do so, just that tons of people try). --Hammersoft (talk) 03:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the movie cast actually said