lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chinese folk religion

message: Hallo, I think the body part of the article should need an update about what happened in the last century with the introduction of the new tlc technologies in the folk religion field ^^^ Lawtheagoraphobic (talk) 22:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and what keywords should we use when we surf for reputable sources who have something to say on this topic? Vagabond nanoda (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 

message: I removed the lead sentence reference to "Shenism" as equivalent to "Chinese folk religion," which was made 5 June 2019 by  with no edit summary. This question was discussed several years ago, archived here. In brief, the term was coined for specifically Southeast Asian use, not as a general descriptor of Chinese religion or Chinese folk religion. ch (talk) 05:20, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The use of "shenism" is quite rare, even for SE Asia, as explained in the discussion linked above, so mentioning it in the lead is WP:Undue. Another reason to avoid it, especially in the lead, is that many of the (few) uses in other places pick up the term from Wikipedia, resulting in a WP:Circular reference.ch (talk) 16:51, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shenism once again 

message: Once again "Shenism" is inserted in the lead sentence without an edit summary, this time by . I once again removed it: Shenism is not another name for "Chinese folk religion" or  "Chinese popular religion". In addition to the points in the section "Shenism once again," above, such as WP:UNDUE, Chinese folk/ popular religion does not center on "Shen". The "family" or "paternal family line" is at least as much if not more important, and the principles of nature run a close second.ch (talk) 22:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Shenism once again, again 

message: How are you 103.144.42.175 (talk) 00:12, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are you 
Talk:Mustapha Mond

message: User:68.190.244.130, don't you think this "Christ figure" thing is a bit far-fetched? Was that your own idea, or where did you get it from? -Gerdthiele 19:51, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

message: The Christ figure is very far-fetched considering that beyond that single quote, Mond and Jesus share no other characteristics and I've been unable to find any verifiable published analysis drawing a parallel between Mond and Jesus. Your personal opinion may be different, but keep in mind that no original research is allowed.  If you can find a verifiable reference and cite it in the article, more power to you.  If not, I think it has to go. Beepbeep 04:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a Christ Figure

message: I found Mond to be of a fundamentally different character from F451's Beatty or 1984's O'Brian.  He basically admitted that he was unhappy with the world he helps create and maintain, but was resigned to it being, essentially, the least bad solution to the various problems civilization had encountered.  He willingly described the stabs at alternative solutions the world government had tried and seemed truly disappointed that they didn't work (e.g., the Alpha-only island population).  I can't really see 1984's Inner Party conducting experiments into social models improving the peopel's lot in life that could replace IngSoc.  Say what you will about the dystopic society, but a government that draws its ranks from the most intelligent rebels against it by rationally arguing the case of continuing the status quo is about as benign as you can get.
Dyolf Knip 17:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dystopic Spokesman
Talk:Kleinstocks

message: Who wrote this? If a triplet dies, it doesn't make the surviving two into twins. That should be fixed, so I'm going to do it. 99.240.146.252 (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twins? 
Talk:Final topology

message: I'm removing the following from the article:
:* Given a family of topologies {τi} on a fixed set X the final topology on X with respect to the functions idX : (X, τi) → X is the infimum (or meet) of the topologies {τi} in the lattice of topologies on X. That is, the final topology τ is the intersection of the topologies {τi}.
I beleive this one is supposed to describe the initial topology not the final topology: The intersection of two topologies will be coarser or weaker than any of the individual τi.  Elsewhere, the article describes the final topology as being the "finest" not the "coarsest". 
I'll be removing a similar paragraph from the initial topology article. linas 20:14, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Be careful Linas; the example is correct. You are confusing greatest element with greatest lower bound. The topology on X must be coarser than each given topology to ensure continuity (i.e. a lower bound), but it is the finest topology which is coarser than each given one (i.e. a greatest lower bound). -- Fropuff 16:15, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. Thanks. Sorry. linas 20:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coarsest topology

message: The article needs an example of a topology that satisfies conditions form being an inital toplogy, but is not a final topology. linas 20:14, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: I'm quite sure that the final topology is also called "inductive topology" and the initial topology is the "projective topology", thus there is a serious mistake in the first sentence (and in the first sentence of the article about the initial topology). This would also be consistent with "inductive topology" redirecting to "final topology" and "projective topology" redirecting to "initial topology" - so either the redirections are wrong or the articles. I think this should be fixed asap, but I haven't changed anything yet because I don't have a reference at hand. TSBM (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 12:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Projective vs. inductive topology 

message: "The final topology on X can be characterized by the following universal property: a function g from X to some space Z is continuous if and only if g \circ f_i is continuous for each i ∈ I."
Well, not really. This universal property is for the topological space (X,\tau). The universal property of  \tau  is the one given at the beginning:
\tau is the finest topology such that each
:f_i: Y_i \to (X,\tau)
is continuous.
This means explicitly: For every topology  \tau' on X such that the f_i are continuous, \tau' \subseteq \tau. (The inclusion \tau' \subseteq \tau can be viewed as a morphism in the category of topologies on X.)
Claus from Leipzig (talk) 12:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the given universal property 

message: In the categorical description section, cones are used when cocones ( F(X) \to N ) might be desired?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.159.16.20 (talk) 03:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cone versus Cocone
Talk:Lipoprotein

message: *water
*acids/bases
*molecules
which of these categories does lipoprotein fits under? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.249.220.7 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 20 November 2005‎ 
:Well, the whole point of lipoproteins is that they're amphoteric. They mix lipids in a hydrophilic medium. They're probably slightly alkaline, but that's not on the record. JFW | T@lk 22:47, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: which

message: The article on lipoprotein particles (LDL, HDL, etc.) should be separate from the article on lipoproteins in general. The introduction here is especially confusing, because it switches back and forth talking about lipoproteins and lipoprotein particles, without making clear which one a particular statement applies to.
128.189.228.138 (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lipoprotein particles vs. lipoproteins 

message: The high-density lipoprotein article says that HDL is smallest, then LDL, then IDL...
Assuming intermediate is less dense than high-dense but more dense than low-dense... shouldn't its size be in between the two?
Why would IDL molecules be LARGER than IDL when they are denser? Ranze (talk) 23:23, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Thickness versus size weirdness

message: The table states that 33+30+29+4=96% for HDL, 104% for LDL & <101% for chylomicrons. Also, what percentages these are? Mass, volume, mol etc.?
Keministi (talk) 08:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Percentages wrong

message: A student imporved thus page and added sources. it seems that the alert banner is not longer relevant.
TMorata (talk) 13:10, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of alert template banner?
Talk:Replay system

message: Before anyone flies off the handle, please take a look at the source article.  Thanks.the1physicist 20:33, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed section 

message: I need to find good references for this but my understanding is that a similar system does exist on newer processors. In order to make the best usage of bypass buses, dependent uops should be scheduled such that they start to execute when their dependency finishes executing. Not all uops have a known latency though so a uop may try to execute then be replayed if it fails the first time due to data not being ready. The canonical example that I hear cited most often is that a uop that depends on a load will try to execute at the L1 latency after the load and be replayed if the load was a miss. I have have only heard the term replay be used for this so it seems at least related to this article even if it is different than how it worked on the P4. I haven't heard it used outside of x86 processors but that doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Here's a StackOverflow post that discusses reply on modern systems. In general, that wouldn't be a good source but I trust Peter Cordes and BeeOnRope to be accurate most of the time so I consider this a case of finding good sources. — Bryce (Talk) 22:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other x86 processors
Talk:The Patriot (2000 film)

message: " There he was, unfortunately for his legacy, a fierce defender of the African slave trade upon which his family fortune was based."
Odd wording. I'd suggest removing "unfortunately for his legacy."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.142.39.50 (talk) 09:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfortunate
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Supermarket skin

message: Why on earth would anyone want to delete this ?
I have a friend who is going through a legal battle at the moment with a large supermarket chain. Opinion  is certainly divided over the existence of this condition but he is being backed-up by several skin experts.
Again, why delete this article ? It's an important question.
Dr C. White (not a medical doctor incase anyone asks)
:Please review WP:NOR and WP:V and then reconsider. I have actually not found a single shred of evidence that this condition exists. Please come back when the first case series has appeared in a peer-reviewed journal. JFW | T@lk 22:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Jason Moran (criminal)

message: It's June 21 2003  Agnte 21:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How do you add book references for this article? I have plenty of information that can be used fron the book by Andrew Rule and John Sylvester?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tekenz (talk • contribs) 10:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book references 
Talk:Initial topology

message: I removed the following from the examples section:
:* Given a family of topologies {τi} on a fixed set X the initial topology on X with respect to the functions idX : X → (X, τi) is the supremum (or join) of the topologies {τi} in the lattice of topologies on X. That is, the initial topology τ is the topology generated by the union of the topologies {τi}.
See Talk:Final topology for a discussion why. (Basically, the join of topologies will be finer or stronger than any of he individual τi, which contradicts the idea that the inital topology is the coarsest topology). linas 20:51, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dohh, my mistake, never mind, restored. linas 02:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coarsest topology

message: By its own admission, Induced topology covered exactly the same topics as Final topology and Initial topology. All encyclopedic content that was there was already contained in the remaining two articles. Therefore I blanked Induced topology and redirected to Initial topology (Coinduced topology was already a redirect to Final topology). Felix QW (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blank and redirect from [[Induced topology]]
Talk:Cast members of Laguna Beach

message: Cast members should not have a seperate page. This info should be on the Laguna Beach wiki. This page should be deleted there is no need for it. Also this entire page is written extremley poorly and needs revision if it is kept!
:I agreee; the Laguna Beach article has basically the same information. —Blurrzuki t - c 21:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete

message: An article by this title has been speedy deleted twice, the first time as an attack page, and the second time when it was a 1-line stub -- no specific reason was given. The current articel is not substantially similar to eitehr previous version adn should not be deleted as reposted content. IMO it does not currently meet any of the speedy deletion criteria. Anyone who thinks this should be delted (and IMO it is not a good article at present) should take it to WP:AFD. DES (talk) 20:53, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous deletions

message: The Taylor Cole article should no be redirected to this article. She played the role of Erika Spalding in Summerland and is also in the 2006 movie Rumble, so, she deserves her own article.
Anyway, according to the IMDB and TV.com, there are two actresses named Taylor Cole: Laguna Beach's Taylor Cole (IMDB's link)TV.com's link and Summerland's Taylor Cole (IMDB's link)TV.com's link.
Also, check the Laguna Beach cast. Laguna Beach's Taylor Cole is blonde, and Summerland's Taylor Cole is a brunette.
So, I will revert the redirect in her article. And I will remove her biography in this article too, and add some stub biography about this TV show's character.
Regards, Carioca 01:32, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Taylor Cole redirect

message: Last time I checked, Kristin Cavallari had her own article, or did she? I can't remember. But what I can say is that this article contradicts itself as it says "Cavallari" in one place and "Cavalleri" in another. Someone needs to give all of these characters their own articles and at least try to find more information.
Эрон Кинней 04:57, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I dont think we need this article 

message: I've started working on cleaning this page up. I still haven't found verification for much of the stuff online. I will add a verify tag to the article which should remind the anon contributors to add verification, although I doubt they will. WAvegetarian (talk)  (email)   (contribs) 11:24, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: I think this article is quite useless and will propose it is moved to the Laguna Beach article.  Still, I fixed all the image clutter and aligned them and resized them.  The pictures are all violating copyright and will most likely be deleted soon.  If anyone actually cares to find appropriate copyright tags, I believe it should be fine because all pictures except for a few are promotional pics of the show, they just need the right liscensing. Myrockstar 06:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Alpine folk music

message: I don't agree with the definition - This article should be called "Volkstümliche Music" instead of Volksmusik, in my opinion. The latter refers to traditional German music which has existed for centuries. Composers from the classical to the romantic period were aware of this traditional music and incorporated form and tonality into their works.
"Volkstümliche Musik" should be the correct term for the musical genre geared towards and popular among older people. My opinion here is supported by the television programme featuring such music, called "Die Volkstümliche Hitparade" (Anon.)
:Quite right. The translation is "Folk music". The present text should be edited into Volkstümliche Music, where it belongs, this present title turned into a redirect for German folk music, and text written there for a fresh stub  (I'm not competent). There is not yet an article for German folk music however, or the narrower and less suitable Volkslieder, which is presented with a redlink in the German music template, but should be a redirect to German folk music, rather than to Lieder.  --Wetman 08:10, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volksmusik - Volkstümliche Musik 

message: Hi! I must edit something in this article, because term Harmonica in german Harmonika means Accordion. Also, I listen Volksmusic and normal Harmonica, who persons uses in Blues or Country music isn't used in German Volksmusik. Every musical instruments are good write in this article, but with this accordion no. I have edited It.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassa342 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harmonica in this style 

message: The article is still lacking inline sourcing. Simply having in the article a list of books, articles, and magazines is not a valid substitute for proper sourcing. The tag about the lack of sources has been up since 2009! If the situation is not improved, contributors will inevitably delete from the article all unsupported text. This won't leave much, even for a stub qualification. -The Gnome (talk) 12:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article still lacking references

message: Added the reference labeled [1], Brittanica uses the same translated as the one here, thought the citation would be useful for fact-checking, anyone who thinks otherwise is welcome to take it up with me!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.138.95.18 (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a reference. 

message: The redirect German Folk Music has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  GnocchiFan (talk) 07:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:German Folk Music]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Devil and Miss Jones

message: I wonder if the famous porn movie of the 1970's was an adaptation of this movie?
---------------------------------
This movie sounds like obvious communist propaganda.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:251A:25B9:ACEA:29D8:C65B:1EB (talk) 07:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Because a boss is sympathetic to his workers, anonymous? Huangdi (talk) 08:00, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kaneto Shiozawa

message: This needs to be merged with Shiozawa Kaneto, but I'm not sure how.
*Done! Evan1975 04:33, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The pages about seiyūs and voice actors are being deleted in the portuguese wiki as fast as wind and here is not. Why? Those pages aren't important to a encyclopedia? Could someone talk with them about this? They say those pages are not relevant... Here there are even templates only for this. --200.103.115.102 14:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help. Garbage?
Template talk:MLSteams

message: This template survived a discussion at TfD. The debate can be found here. -Splashtalk 21:10, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: TfD debate

message: I merged this into Template:Major League Soccer before I saw this:
(As per Wikipedia's fair use policy, please avoid using copyrighted logos directly on navigation templates) --DR31 14:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted logos
Talk:5/11

message: Merge with Gunpowder Plot? I'd say not. Maybe I'm biased, as I originated the 5/11 article - but I think the concept of 5/11 is a distinct entity, and deserves to stand on its own. There is also a play called 5/11, by Ed Kemp. I have expanded the article to include a mention of this. --Hugh2414 21:18, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shenandoah, New York

message: I added "It was the birthplace in 1816 of financier Russell Sage" and then realized that there must have been another Shenandoah in New York, at some time.  The only one that DeLormé recognizes is the one in Fishkill, but see .  Anyone have any light to shed? -- Mwanner | Talk 21:19, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article on East Fishkill, New York only recognizes "Shenandoah Corners," as one of their hamlets. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  17:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Talk:2002 NASCAR Winston Cup Series

message: Some of the info in this article is copied word-for-word from 2003 in NASCAR. How did this happen? --D-Day 21:24, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: I remember that Matt Kenseth's team was fined by NASCAR for something in race 2, but I forgot what.  If any1 wants to confirm this and add it to the article then that would be great.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricky2009 (talk • contribs) 03:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RACE number 2 Controversy 

message: It seems like some of the results are incorrect. Some showing that Dario Franchitti has multiple wins, when he didn't move to NASCAR until 2007. -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 19:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual accuracy 

message: If you go to the full drivers results and click on the second “Dov” results, the earlier Atlanta race results come up instead of the actual Dover results that Jimmie Johnson won. I am not smart enough to figure out how to fix this but wanted someone to know so that perhaps they could fix it. Just not my cup of team intellect wise. 
thank you for your time 
-Hammer GHaney70 (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd Dover Race wrong
Talk:Higher alkane

message: I've added links to the individual pages for some of the alkanes and added links from those pages back here.  I'll continue with the rest, unless anyone objects. Edgar181 21:28, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I shouldn't do, one of the reasons for this page is to merge most of the very short alakne articles into it. There is some debate (at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals) as to which articles to keep and which to merge, but a substantial number should be replaced by redirects here. Current positions:
*Keep Hexadecane and Nonacosane. (Physchim62 (talk))
*Keep all up to C20. (Walkerma)
Join in the debate by all means. Physchim62 (talk) 07:38, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 80.49.191.252 (talk) 23:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is the list of lower alkanes?
Talk:Bailrigg FM

message: Just to add my part into this discussion... I edited the content in order to update issues over SBN which are out of date and known only to those older and ex-members of student radio stations. Furthermore some of the information provided was inaccurate (SBN never issued licenses, DJ's are not free to play "whatever they like", Richard Allinson's name spelt incorrectly etc).  With regards to the dual linking of the website address, this was in the original content of the wiki (check the version you have reverted to) and had nothing to do with myself. As a current and long standing member of the station I feel I have insight and up-to-date knowledge which can add to the accuracy of the article.
:194.80.32.8 22:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content Dispute