lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trinidad and Tobago Carnival

message: I edited the section on "Characters" because some of the information was inaccurate and none of the information was cited or supported. Also, the linked Wikipedia articles in the characters section were irrelevant to the words they were linked to. I added links throughout the article to relevant words to a new, more detailed, page that I am currently creating about Trinidad Carnival characters (and their costumes).   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejia.maria (talk • contribs) 18:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this article needs significant rewording and expansion, I might have a go at it when I get the time.--campdog 07:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work

message: Entire thing copied, not encyclopedic, looks like blatant advertising (see the end of "costumes" section.) Someone, please fix it, I haven't the time.  H4xx0r-666 (talk) 01:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible 

message: Gg 181.188.100.167 (talk) 13:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fy 

message: Why is it important? 2803:1500:E02:E5D6:2128:4B08:4809:60E7 (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is carnival important to the culture of t&t ?
Portal talk:Current events/Middle East

message: Unitedphoenician, please stop vandalizing this talk page, Portal:Current events/Middle East, and the rest of Wikipedia. Please note that spam is a form of vandalism, and take heed of the warnings on your talk page. -Etafly 01:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam 

message: Maybei'm going crazy or something, but all i see is news about Europe 212.187.1.213 (talk) 20:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle East?
Talk:Melamphaes microps

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Ridgehead

message: When I was making the article poromitra crassiceps, I found a reference which indicated that the 18cm ridgehead caught was actually the Alaskan fish poromitra curilensis, which also has the common name crested bigscale. I'd like to suggest modifying the article accordingly, but I didn't want to presume. 0x0077BE (talk) 21:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest ridgehead
Talk:Poromitra oscitans

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Oceanic lightfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Phosichthys

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 10:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Category talk:Universities in Tasmania

message: This category is a bit pointless.  There is only one university in Tasmania. -- Barrylb 07:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Australian Maritime College is by definition a University, I have added this to the category. --Canley 14:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually looking at List of universities in Australia, it explains why although for almost all practical purposes AMC is a university, it technically isn't due to its narrow academic focus. I think I'll revert it. --Canley 14:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments
Talk:Argyropelecus gigas

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Gonostomatidae

message: Both this page and the lanternfish page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanternfish) claim that their respective fishes are the most abundant globally, but obviously that can only be true of one of them. Since neither page cites a reference for this particular claim, it's not immediately obvious which of the two is correct. But at least one page is necessarily wrong. philius 22:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  contradiction with lanternfish page
Talk:Argyropelecus hemigymnus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 06:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Margrethia obtusirostra

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Monocentris japonica

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Neonesthes capensis

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mueller's pearlside

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The image used in the description previously was a plate erroneously captioned as M. muelleri - in fact, the image showed a Myctophid lanternfish, labelled on the image apparently as both a "stomiatid" (defunct family) and as an "argentine" (completely unrelated group of fishes). As the image already has an illustration, I have replaced this image with my own photograph of a fresh-caught individual. HulloThere (talk) 11:55, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switched out image in Description
Talk:Pattern 1853 Enfield

message: Link to company pages in the Reproductions section. Davide Pedersoli & C. and Armi Chiappa (Armi Sport) 2600:1000:B057:8D28:764D:6B26:94CA:BDA2 (talk) 01:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: —Sirdog (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2021
Talk:Sloane's viperfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Stomiidae

message: — Assignment last updated by Sophiaschortmann (talk) 18:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Deep Sea Biology

message: Carmichael, S. (2019). It can bite you even if you can’t see it. Microscopy Today, 27(6), 8-10. 
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1551929519001056
Davis, M. et al. (2014). Species-specific bioluminescence facilitates speciation in the deep sea. 
Marine Biology, 161, 1139–1148. DOI 10.1007/s00227-014-2406-x 
Herring, P. & Cope, C. Red bioluminescence in fishes: on the suborbital photophores
of Malacosteus, Pachystomias and Aristostomias. Marine Biology, 148, 383–394. DOI 10.1007/s00227-005-0085-3
Herring, P. (2007). Sex with the lights on? A review of bioluminescent sexual dimorphism in the 
sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 87(4), 829-842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315407056433
Amacdo (talk) 02:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Stoplight loosejaw

message: Related fishes have a tapetum lucidum that further enhances their ability to see in the dark;  does this one?  If yes, does this fish use the photophore and tapetum lucidum for covert communications with other fish? --Una Smith (talk) 04:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tapetum lucidum
Talk:Veiled anglemouth

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:The O'Jays

message: The O'jays are one of the longest running African American singing groups of their time.
Contradiction: "Use Ta Be My Girl" was their final Top Five hit, though they continued scraping the bottom of the R&B charts throughout the 1980s. Let Me Touch You (1987; see 1987 in music) was a breakthrough of sorts, and included the #1 R&B hit "Lovin' You". If the O'Jays were "scraping the bottom of the R&B charts throughout the 1980s," how did they have a #1 R&B hit in 1987? 66.17.118.207 15:03, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While the O'Jays made it big with the Gamble & Huff's Sound of Philadelpiha (TSOP), the O'Jays are distinctly a N.E. Ohio based group that lived/centered their lives in and around Cleveland... Last week's tragic early passing of Eddie Levert's popular son, Gerald, proves this point, as Gerald was born and educated in greater Cleveland, Canton and Shaker Heights, respectively, and had a huge, star-studded memorial service Friday (11/18/06) in downtown Cleveland's Public Hall... so this should be changed. 151.197.39.235 22:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Philadelphia group??

message: Article needs a discography section... -- Mattbrundage 04:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, and BADLY!!! 24.7.217.221 00:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography? 

message: Other early O'JAY'S chart hits from the period between 1963 -1966 included "STAND IN FOR LOVE", "LIPSTICK TRACES" (WHICH THEY PERFORMED ON NATIONAL TELEVISION ON THE ABC TELEVISION SERIES, "SHIVAREE","LET IT ALL OUT",AND "WORKING ON YOUR CASE". 
    
POST 1966 HITS INCLUDED "LOOK OVER YOUR SHOULDER" (1967),"DEEPER IN LOVE WITH YOU",(1969)"LOOKY,LOOKY (LOOK AT ME GIRL)"(1970)AND "ONE NIGHT AFFAIR"(1970). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghirlandajo (talk • contribs) 10:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous additions 

message: This is quite a nice little article! If the paragraphs without terminating citations could get some, it'd easily be a "B" :) --Neopeius (talk) 15:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Readers will come to this article expecting to see something about Little.  In doing that, they will expect to see something not only about his membership of the group, but a link to the information about his death and the identification of his remains.  A paragraph simply ending in uncertainty, saying "we don't know what happened to him", when it is now known (to some extent) what did happen to him, is incomplete and needs to be completed.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Full support for this statement. --Killuminator (talk) 17:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frankie Little