lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jo Ritzen

message: "Ritzen started in 1963 on Bernardinus College in Heerlen." 
That would mean at the age of 18.
It seems more likely, that in that year this college was left.
VKing (talk) 15:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Education

message: According to this source
, the relevant person  didn't finish the academic study in economy, but later on got a PhD on an economic subject.
Can a person, who studied medicine for a few years, but didn't finish that study be called "medician", just because later on he wrote a dissertation on a medical subject (and thus became doctor in Philosophy)? VKing (talk) 15:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Economist?
Talk:Ladies National Association for the Repeal of the Contagious Diseases Acts

message: I've added this because the "See also" section is far too long as it stands, but I don't know enough about the subject to know which entries should be kept. I would suggest half a dozen at the absolute most, preferably three or four. It's not necessary to have a "See also" entry for every single significant player in this area. Loganberry (Talk) 14:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 

message: I have done what I can, although I could remove links to hitherto empty articles. I would prefer to keep these however, as it demonstrates how much is still to do and permits focus on priorities and timetables. I do intend to fill in the blanks.Tractorboy60 20:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Handi-Snacks

message: A "Cheese and Crackers"(sp?) snack (without the Ritz branding) was available from Kraft much earlier than the 1980s, in exactly the same type of presentation and packaging.  Those old enough to remember tell me that the cheese was of better quality.  It may have needed to be refrigerated.  knoodelhed (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember the pre-Ritz Kraft Handi-Snack in the early 1980s - it was never refrigerated. I think the belief that the cheese used to be better is just nostalgia - it was always like it is now.2600:387:C:6A13:0:0:0:7 (talk) 04:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product history pre 1980s
Talk:Federal government of Iraq

message: Please see Talk:Federalism in Iraq for a discussion on whether or not there should be a separate article on this subject. AndrewRT(Talk) 12:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federalism in Iraq 
Talk:2002 in Iraq

message: Cheney's testimony about controversial (nonexistent) Iraqi bioweapon-laden UAV's threatening the Eastern Seaboard was in the U.S., not "in Iraq".... NCC-8765 (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  October UAV threat 
Talk:Never Say Goodbye (musical)

message: That "official" Takarazuka site external link is not official at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.40.244 (talk) 06:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: THank you, I looked at it and tried to show a more exact name; it appears to be a "wiki" fan site.JeanColumbia (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: External links section=
Talk:Kvitøya

message: I corrected the name of Gilles according to the Encyc. Britt. of 1911. However, I don't know if those old maps call the island 'Giles island' or 'Gilles island'. Soczyczi 14:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cornelis Gilles

message: Kvitøya area is 682 sq.km., but ice cap is 705 sq.km. and several sq.km. not covered. The island shape at different maps in WikiPedia is also inconsistent, but area value correspods to the larger shape. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 07:11, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island Area
Talk:Geo News

message: The intro contains little factual information and makes claims that is is considered "number #1 news channel in Pakistan" and one of the "most hyped."  Neither of these statements details who believes this and I'm not sure what "most hyped" even means in this context, but I know it is definitely subjective.  I am removing these characterizations. --RDavi404 (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All these years later, the article still has POV issues. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it has WP:OR  and WP:NPOV issues. More like a piece of propaganda information. Removed it. talk) 09:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV intro 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Amin Hafeez and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 20#Amin Hafeez until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Amin Hafeez" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I think a better source is  needed for the claim that the channel is pushing pro  PPP-P AND PML-N content .
Forest576 (talk) 19:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political affiliation 

message: Abu sufyan new karachi kum
Har Wara 117.102.55.176 (talk) 08:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: Ip address is new karachi kum wara 25 horse hotel 117.102.55.176 (talk) 08:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Password code 12345
Talk:Kolyma Tales

message: The sentence "Shalamov didn't make a single mention of Stalin in the book except for a brief mentioning of a large portrait of the man in an administrator's office" seems a little bit to definitive to me: Stalin's death is mentioned several times, in relation with the author's departure from the Kolyma. Furthermore, Stalin's case could be compared with that of other sovietic officials who are indeed cited more often: Dalstroy's directors (Berzin, Pavlov), or Beria, for example.
I apologize for my weak level in english, which does not allow me to modify directly the article on these points. Gouffy (talk) 12:56, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this should be fixed. My very best wishes (talk) 16:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Stalin
Talk:Donggar Subdistrict

message: check location: coordinates (place near Shigatse) do not fit to description - there seem to be 2 Donggar's one at 29.3333N 88.8166E the other at 31.0666N 90.8333E. --katpatuka (talk) 08:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:In the Ceiling the Stars Are Shining

message: Sorry I just HAVE GOT TO rewrite this article it's terrible. Partyface (talk) 21:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BAD ENGLISH 
Talk:Amy Pearson

message: Does anyone know what division of Sony BMG she's on? Sony BMG is not a label. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Label 
Talk:Skweezer

message: The page for Skweezer was previously deleted for lack of notability back in March 2007 which, given the previous article content, was fair. However there is some historical interest to Skweezer and I think this new version does a much better of justifying its existence with external sources and better objectivity. I want to thank the WP users and admins whose suggestions have been very valuable in making this more encyclopedic and not advertising copy. We've been working on this content for several weeks on and off in a temporary location, and I'm proud how far we've come. I think this article finally meets WP standards. Barnabask 15:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring Skweezer Entry 

message: Article states Skweezer blocks WebTV, but I am using WebTV right now, and Skweezer works quite well with it. Maybe there was a block on WebTV at one time, but I don't think anymore. Afraid to change this, since personal experience is (very) original research; will add  in its place. Hamamelis (talk) 04:53, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WebTV blocked?? 

message: I work at Skweezer, Inc. and we support WebTV traffic. In fact, about 10% of our page views are from WebTV devices.
Angsthead (talk) 17:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WebTV is NOT blocked
Talk:Denis Baupin

message: You may also want to check out the French language entry on Baupin. ericbritton 15:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Members of the New Jersey General Assembly

message: Can someone please remove Mims Hackett and Alfred Steele from this list because I don't know how, Both Assemblyman resigned due to their arrest on federal corruption charges. 141.150.117.99 15:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since they were once members of the Assembly, the articles should be in this category. Accurizer (talk) 23:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Legislators from list
Talk:Anbar Salvation Council

message: The name has chaged to Council of Iraqi tribes (Arabic: مجلس عشائر العراق )  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.250.136.103 (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name  

message: Both pages appear to be regarding the same topic, Anbar Salvation Council is just an alternative name for Sons of Iraq, which is mentioned in the heading of the page, both pages have similar information too. Lolekek (talk) 16:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal into [[Sons of Iraq]]
Talk:Wilkinsburg High School

message: Wilkinsburg Jr/Sr High has since closed. its final class was class of 2016. jr and sr high school students now go to Westinghouse High in the city of Pittsburgh. 2603:7080:3A39:51D1:7107:BC89:7C66:30ED (talk) 07:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I found all this by accident, while dealing with extreme and sustained disruption by Raindrop73. I've merged the article with the school district page. Graham87 11:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  this needs some changing
Talk:Compelling state interest

message: In Constitutional Law, a court employs one of three main tests for Due Process or equal protection claims: strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis.  Compelling state interest is part of a strict scrutiny test for state actions only (under a Fourteenth Amendment challenge).  Because strict scrutiny has its own article, this page could be incorporated into that one as part of a subheading.  Should that particular section become too long (through discussion of past Fourteenth Amendment Claims), this page could be reinstated.  The traditional state interests that are "compelling" are those that involve the "health, safety, and welfare" of its citizens.
The previous stub discussed abortion and privacy as employing the compelling state interest test.  This was false.  Abortion has its own test that of "substantial obstacle", privacy is a liberty interest employing a rational basis test or intermediate scrutiny test depending on the case and the theory of the commentator.
Legis Nuntius 19:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong support for the proposed merge; both articles will be better for it. bd2412 T 11:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Alaska Airlines Flight 1866

message: This article had a red link.  I was going to start an article.  When clicking it, it was noted that it was previously deleted.  However, it appears that there is sufficient reason to recreate.
The original reason cited was "Housekeeping. Non-controversial maintenance, such as temporarily deleting a page to merge page histories, or performing a non-controversial page move like reversing a redirect."
I don't know what the original article said but I will rewrite one.
Note that the crash has incorrectly been cited as the first Alaska Airlines crash.  It's nice that Wikipedia will be the one to correct this error. The crash was the first Alaska Airlines jet to crash.
Archtrain 15:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Between this crash and the major avalanche in Juneau the following year, can it be stated positively one way or the other as to whether these incidents sparked the capital move issue again during the 1970s, a period when it saw its greatest success?RadioKAOS (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there are sources out there which explicitly mention a connection.  Since the capital move issue has been dormant for many years, it's not as likely that you'll find them via Google as you would a more recent event.  Good luck, though.  Unless, of course, this article is only supposed to be narrowly focused on aviation, regardless of the existence of sources which may show it to be relevant to anything else. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  22:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Any relation to capital move issue?
Talk:Chaka Demus & Pliers

message: Tell this ot reh where’s is this going. Ha ha Demus 2600:1002:B053:288B:F927:AD8A:24E:F8DB (talk) 02:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where the H in R block is my photoz
Talk:Film Streams

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 22:41, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Junius manuscript

message: This page draws heavily from Andrew Sanders's The Short Oxford History of English Literature without citing it as the source.
:Are there direct or virtually direct quotations? If so, it is WP:COPYVIO if not referenced, and for short fair use quotes. If it is adapted, it should be referenced. Perhaps you could look at this, if you have the book. Of course, both may derive from a common source, if the wording is different. Johnbod 15:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe the name "Cædmon manuscript" has fallen out of fashion; most recent articles and books call it "Junius manuscript" or "Junius 11". Shouldn't we move this article? – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 16:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Shall we take a vote? I'm in for the same reason. --Akhenaten0 (talk) 19:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Deas Vail

message: I think we should make this into a real artical with a discography (albums) section and a history and a list of members and stuff.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.235.118 (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This artical need work

message: Does anyone know where their name came from?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.151.200 (talk) 20:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: POV is wrong and doesn't fit where it's placed. Sorry to that IP who put it in, I don't really know where, if anywhere, that paragraph or information should fit in the article, but it needs to be heavily edited from an enthusiastic band review to a npov information piece.Danosaur (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: un encyclopedic bio introductory section removed
Talk:Conservative Research Department

message: There is regular criticism of CRD by the party membership. Perhaps this should be mentioned? Similarly, should it be noted that the current policy reviews within the Conservative Party are being done by groups outside of CRD? SupernautRemix 15:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms of CRD

message: Any chance of somebody looking up a list of CRD Directors? I think Chris Patten held the post in the 1970s (and was pretty anti-Thatcher) and Andrew Lansley in the early 90s. Happy to be corrected though.Paulturtle (talk) 01:10, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Directors
Talk:Hinky Dinky

message: As a son of the founder of Hinky Dinky, a former owner, and an officer, I wish to correct some minor errors and to add a great deal of factual information to the Wikipedia's Hinky Dinky site.  At the request of the Nebraska Jewish Historical Society, I wrote a lengthy history of the Hinky Dinky Supermarket chain.  You can find it at this site: http://hinkydinky.net/hinky-dinky-history/.  I realize that much of the information in this history would not be appropriate for Wikipedia, but it does contain a lot of detail which is essential to present an adequate Wikipedia Hinky Dinky section.
Please tell me how I can go about helping Wikipedia improve this site.Enewman4729 (talk) 19:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lalamusa

message: Please don't add unsourced, vain personality promotional material to the article. Such material is totally against Wikipedia policies like WP:NOT, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NOR besides other things. They also destroy the encyclopedic nature of the article. Encyclopedia articles are primarily meant to offer scholarly material on various topics. Not irrelevant, unsourced, vain, promotional stuff.-Civilizededucationtalk 01:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional, unsourced material 

message: I won't add a template, but this could really use an infobox, if only to clear up the coordinates. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox needed 

message: pakistan high school  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.88.8.121 (talk) 15:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  schools
Wikipedia talk:Translation/General Government

message: I can read Polish well enough, and know the wartime history of Poland well enough, to judge that the Polish article on the General Government (the rump Nazi state in control of central Poland) is worthy of translation. The level of detail it goes into may be more than most readers will need in an English version, but after some abridgment this would be a fine addition. 
There does exist an English-language article on the General Government, rated b-class, which I believe should be largely supplanted by an adaptation from the Polish article whenever the latter becomes available. The current English article has attracted some edits that appear motivated by Polish chauvinism, and the more comprehensive Polish version is authoritative enough to discourage that sort of thing, I would hope.
I wish I had time to take on the translation myself, but I just don't. Also, I have rarely used my Polish in the past decade and so am rather rusty. I would be happy to review the work of others on the translation, and I may be able to furnish references as needed to discussions of the GG in various works of history I have on hand.
Tom Wood 15:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Endorsement of need to translate this article
Talk:Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Beta

message: I created this article for a few purposes, although admittedly I did not have the time to create the article and us all original information so I just copied and pasted. Although the vision that I have for the article is that it will facilitate 3 major objectives. 
Objective 1: After the game is fully released, informaiton about the beta will not be as pertinent, I feel the mentioning of a beta in the main article is appropriate and then having this page to detail the beta. 
Objective 2: Provide an area for more specific details about the beta without hindering or overrunning the premise of the original article. 
Objective 3: Simplify the main article and provide an additional article for those wanting to know more about the beta. In other words only the interested people will click to find out more about the beta and thus simplify the main article. 
Again, I acknowledge the need for a lot of improvment but the intent of my original posting of this article is to provide a new page to changed and altered to reflect specifics about the beta that might not be appropriate in the main article.(Fighting Zucchini 17:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hang on - copied and pasted from where? Do you have permission? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 15:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From the Call of duty 4 main article. Not just from an obligatory website. I am just trying to get something going here for people to work with so that people who want details can be satisfied as well as people who want the main article to remain simple. (Fighting Zucchini 17:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Phew! I think it's alright here, if you give it a clean! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 18:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Well i think that its nice you didn't want to clutter the main page but the main website gives all the information on the beta there. But also after the beta is over and the new game is released noone will really care about the beta too much basically the main game. Im sure there was probaly a Halo 3 beta page, which is alot more notable but was moved into marketing. Right now i can see the se for this page but in about a month or two i see no porpose for the page.(ForeverDEAD 19:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Honestly I pretty much agree with you, which is why up until this point this page has recived just about as much effort as I have put into it. I just cant figure out how to link this article to the word BETA in the orignal article. (Fighting Zucchini 20:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Nescio 2

message: In the interests of full disclosure, I was an informal mediator for a disagreement between Gaxter and Nescio. Regarding the advocacy of this RfC, I would comment the view that George W. Bush is a criminal is a widely held view that doesn't in any way suggest the editor holds views which are so extreme that s/he should be banned from editing. Also, if you were to ban editors critical of George W. Bush, then it would follow you would also have to ban his supporters, a point missed by the filers of this RfC. Addhoc 17:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll take that out.  Isaac Pankonin 22:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I really have no problem with him having those opinions.  But it's been difficult to work with him.  Also, the dispute was not just between him and GATXER.  There were at least two other editors who disagreed with him, and he simply kept reverting.  I'm not defending GATXER in the least.  All I'm saying is that Nescio's behavior, while not as overt as GATXER, is essentially the same.  It's not obvious from his comments, but when you look at his actions, you'll see what I mean.  I suggest going through the whole history of Iraq Resolution, starting with the first diff I listed.  Isaac Pankonin 23:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the RfC advocacy by Addhoc