lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ritornello

message: I removed the following: "This Form was made by Antonio Vivaldi. He used this in his most well known piece called The Four Seasons." "The Four Seasons" is a collection of works and not a single piece, and they are all written in concerto form, though certain movements of them make use of the ritornello technique; however, the Ritornello form itself pre-dates Vivaldi, and he did not create it. True ritornello form can be seen in the dance movements of Telemann's "Tafelmusik" ("Table Music"), the "Rejouissance-Rondeau-Loure-Passepied" section.
I am adding a section on the use of the term ritornello to denote an instrumental section of music in an early baroque opera. Jmclark (talk) 07:32, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The first two paragraphs look like they've been copied out of The New Grove Encyclopedia of Music and Musicians. Edited by Stanley Sadie. Second edition vol. 21. Forgive me if I am wrong (this may just be source citation), but the start of the first paragraph looks suspiciously like it has been lifted straight from the encyclopedia. --Molerat 18:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it, it was a straight copy and paste. In the future, I believe you can simply remove copyright violations like that (this is assuming you have access to the encyclopedia to check it). Mak (talk) 15:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyvio 

message: This article confuses ritornello and ritornello form.  Ritonello refers to both the ensemble and section that returns and also to the design of the movement as a whole.  Ritornello Form refers to the form of the ritornello itself (Vordersatz, Fortspinnung, Epilog).  I don't have time right now to correct the lackadaisical confusion of these two terms in this article, but I will hopefully remember to return.  If I don't, please correct it for me.  Thanks! 21:35, 23 May 2009
: There is a larger problem here, in that the term "ritornello" can refer to a good many things depending on the time and place you are refering to. There is a difference between "a ritornello" and "ritornello form." Perhaps the article should be edited to discuss the use of the ritornello as a device and the ritornello as a musical form. Jmclark (talk) 09:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:Osgoode Hall Law School

message: Why has PM Arthur Meighen been removed? He received his Doctor of Laws through what was then (1902) an early rendition of Osgoode Hall Law School? 
Also, likewise for PM John A. MacDonald? The only reason I can see that he has been removed, is because Osgoode Hall Law School wants to dissociate itself from him for obvious political reasons? Of course, and it needs not be said, but nonetheless, Wikipedia should not be reflecting the private/political desires of educational institutions. 
Please re-add both, and lock down the Prime Minister’s section from editing. Thank you. 142.114.117.147 (talk) 14:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop Removing Prime Minister’s
Talk:JACDEC

message: Neither of these articles is really long enough to stand on its own, and the safety index seems like a fairly clear subcategory of the organization that it's named after. A redirect could be set up at JACDEC Safety Index, and all the content put together on one page. --Cantara 18:15, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge

message: Where has been debated? At Turkish Airlines office? Even without DC-10 Turkish safety record isn't great.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.149.241.188 (talk) 13:47, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible inaccuracy 

message: I have removed the "JACDEC safety index" section as a probable copyright violation. The text is very similar to the current version of this www.jacdec.de page; so similar, that I am sure when the section was added here, it was a copy-paste from the 2014 version of the external page.
I think the text in the lead section of the article is a sufficient summary of how the index is calculated. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probable copyright violation 

message: Hi all,
Does anyone still think that this page is advertising? I read through it and it seems to be a good article.  Geardona (talk) 01:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising banner removal
Talk:Cheminformatics

message: Dear all,
I tried to add the following external link to this page:
* Click2Drug - Directory of computational drug design tools.
I think this link makes sense here:
* it's not an advertising or a link to a commercial web site,
* it is a serious page handled by people from the Swiss institute of Bioinformatics,
* it gives a list of software and web servers dedicated to drug Design and chemoinformatics from several providers.
However, the link seems to have been removed (automatically?).
Would it be possible to reconsider this link, and eventually let it in this page in the section "external link"?
Thank you for your help,
Vincent  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vzoete (talk • contribs) 07:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Click2Drug.org 

message: The opening paragraph should probably delineate how Cheminformatics differs from Computational Chemistry. They are both listed, one after another, in List_of_academic_disciplines#Chemistry. swain (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versus Computational Chemistry 

message: Is there a general policy how to deal with commercial link-outs? Here some ideas I was thinking about:
* If a commercial supplier provides an excellent documentation for Cheminformatics I have no problems with commercial link-outs.
* If this linking is only used to push web pages I do not like it at all.
* I am sure Wikipedia has already some policies here, so where can we find them?
Joerg Kurt Wegner 18:15, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Try looking here: WP:SPAM and Wikipedia:Wikiproject no ads --DV8 2XL 18:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial link-outs? 

message: The following Cheminformatics quotes should be added to Wikiquote JKW 12:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 
Talk:MAGIC Fund

message: Mr. Hale,
Thank you for your contributions!  I greatly appreciate that such a leader in the MAGIC fund debate would contribute to this article.  I hope that this will eventually develop into an in-depth, balanced article that everyone can learn something from.
--AlexWCovington (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sara people

message: Does anyone know if there ever was an article behind the link to yondo?  Following the link there redirects me to something in Colombia, not Chad.
75.138.179.24 (talk) 00:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yondo redirection 

message: There is no such thing as North Sudan. 142.68.54.94 (talk) 20:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead paragraph
Talk:Flesh (comics)

message: Theres still a bit i have to put up but feel free to add anything i may have missedLogan1138 18:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add in the publicaitons history. Looking good though. (Emperor 17:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK I did that but was unsure about Simon Jacobs invovlement with the series - t doesn't show up on the 2000AD database (Emperor 02:15, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have distinct memories of this series being released in Sweden or one just like it in the late 80's or early 90's (was a kid back then).
It was in it's own magazine and it was in color it started with Old One Eye loosing her eye and ended it's run with the jaw of Old One Eye during present day killing a professor at a natural history museum when he knocks out it's supports!
Darkwand~commonswiki (talk) 21:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Series in Sweden
Talk:Evoked field

message: I propose to merge Auditory evoked field into this article, since both articles are very short, and an auditory evoked field is just one example of an evoked field. bd2412 T 12:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw your notice at WT:NEURO.  I didn't see this as being a controversial merger, so I just went ahead and merged the articles.  "Auditory evoked field" is clearly a subtopic/type of "Evoked field". Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 17:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. bd2412 T 17:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Steady-state evoked potential

message: Interesting new material.  I believe it adds substantially to the value of the article, but could use work in a couple of respects.  Most importantly, the article as now written is only understandable by people with a very high level of technical sophistication (such as me, but I'm not the target audience of Wikipedia).  It would be much better for a brief introduction that lays out the concepts at a level appropriate for a reader with a modest understanding of brain electrical activity.  Second, there are too many references.  Unlike a scientific journal, Wikipedia prefers a few "secondary" references (i.e., review papers, textbooks, etc) to a large mass of primary references.  So, it would be nice to pare this down to the essentials.  If you can do that, I'll help with the formatting of the references. Looie496 (talk) 02:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regan work
Talk:P300 (neuroscience)

message: Page content was changed dramatically, since original page discussed both P3a and P3b, but there is now a page for each of these subcomponents.  This page now describes history and retains applications from old page; content overlapping with that on new pages has been incorporated there and deleted here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfederme (talk • contribs) 12:07, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

message: This page could benefit from a discussion of the distinction between the P3a vs. P3b components.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abe (or Abraham) (talk • contribs) 03:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  P3a vs. P3b 

message: This article is definitely written like an essay. I'm sure of it.
The DarkArcher was here (talk) 01:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essay for Sure 

message: While linking the orphaned P300 Test to this page, I noticed that it contains better information on the test than the specific sub article, so I am proposing a merge and redirect, rather than copying the additional information from this article into the P300 Test page.
--James Chenery (talk) 22:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree in principle, but I'm not sure there is actually anything in the other article worth merging. Looie496 (talk) 16:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging P300 Test into this article?

message: According this paper P300 response is heritable.
•   Reduced P300 brain response associated with antisocial and substance use problems
•   Weak self-control (Disinhibition) mediates association between P300 & problems
•   Genetic influences account for mutual associations between Dis/problems & P300
Wongba (talk) 10:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence for a heritable brain basis to deviance-promoting deficits in self-control 

message: Ortega, E., Rengachari, S., Ibrahim, Z. et al. Transcription factor dimerization activates the p300 acetyltransferase. Nature 562, 538–544 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0621-1 2601:14D:4D7C:2180:AD81:4A03:D4A5:2F91 (talk) 21:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  distinction between "P300" and "p300" the acetyltransferase
Talk:Eddie Eagan

message: Many websites say Eagan was born in 1898. More importantly, The Golden Book of the Olympic Games, by Erich Kamper and the great Bil Mallon, agrees...
All the best,
Cris Freddi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.193.152 (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm making what might be a controversial edit, but the wp articles have to have consistent information. The change is that it says on [] that  Gillis Grafström also won a gold medal for figure skating in the 1920 Summer games, and the 1924/28 Winter games, as Figure skating was a Summer game in the 1920 olympics, this qualifies as winning a gold in both seasons. Dancindazed (talk) 05:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: two seasons gold factoid
Talk:Granada plc

message: Have completely rewritten this page, it consisted in its first incarnation of what was obviously a copy of an old Granada website (the text "(C) Granada plc" gave that away)...--Rdd 19:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Classical music/Archive 2

message: Why is there no introduction? There was one once. Hyacinth 01:40, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It was vandalism; I'm trying to fix it but the database is being difficult tonight. Antandrus 02:17, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Still not a proper introduction. Hyacinth 00:47, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro
Talk:Strickland v. Sony

message: read the article from start to finish.. it doesn't make sense  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.82.130 (talk) 00:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 19:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: *"Moore killed the three policemen after being booked for commiting grand theft auto."
*:...what? 04:58, 12 February 2006 User:4.231.87.92
*What do you mean what?Mimbster 23:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Shot 3 policemen"?

message: Oh my, they're gonna poison him... Damn... well, he deserved it after killing those policemen. What a psychopatic move. Hoodie 16:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lethal Injection?

message: GameSpot indicates that Devin's last name is "Thompson," but another GameSpot article and other publications claim it's "Moore." Please clarify. ╫ ２５ ◀RingADing▶ 16:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moore/Thompson as last name

message: "In the episode a student demonstrated the Grand Theft Auto to them, explaining that in one of the games there is a mission that depicts exactly what Moore did: escape a police station, kill officers and escape in a police cruiser."
Huh? Which game and what level, cus I haven't seen it in GTA3, GTA:VC, or GTA:SA... - Doug, 19:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: Someone inserted into the start of article "died 2005". is that a vandalism piece or did they already execute him? AFAIK, american murderers usually spend 5-8 years behind bars before being finished off for public good. As President jackson said USA is built upon three basic values: motherhood, the flag and capital punishment. 82.131.210.162 (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good riddance that soon?
Talk:James v. Meow Media

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 19:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: This article isn't particularly clear. I would presume that they were suggesting Meow Media etc share some liability not are solely liable. In other words, they aren't suggesting James isn't liable but that multiple parties are liable. But the article doesn't really convey this. I think this is important since these sort of things tend to be potrayed as if the people are saying James (or whoever) isn't liable when often this isn't the case. I still regard it as ridiculous as I'm sure to many others but it is important we make the distinction Nil Einne 11:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liability 

message: The article doesn't mention Meow Media. From what I can gather, they're the owner of a pornography site but this isn't clear from here. Nil Einne 14:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meow Media?
Talk:Jack Thompson and video game players

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 19:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: From  LiveJournal Parodies: "Discovering Wikipedia through links at GP, Jack Thompson posted what he termed to be corrections on this article."
This looks like a violation of WP:SELF. Shadowoftime 23:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not so sure if that's actually true per se, since him vandalizing his own articles would be a noteworthy enough if some media had picked it up, but as far as i know it wasn't reported anywhere except on gamepolitics.com and some of the gaming forums, all of which seem to fall outside of the reliable sources sphere for wikipedia. So while in this case the info might not belong, i'd not say that in general reporting that someone notable has edited his own wikipedia page could never be reported. But there needs to be a secondary source, since wiki is a tertiary source and not a secondary. SanderJK 11:51, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:SELF

message: I hate Jack Thompson as much as the next person with a brain, but I really don't think Wikipedia is the place to track his every movement.  Sure, certain bits of this are notable enough that they should be on his main page if they aren't already, but I really can't see the argument that Jack Thompson is such an important person that there needs to be a separate article on his interactions with a group of people.-Polotet 00:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that there are already complaints about the main article being to long, resulting in discussions every time the tiniest bit of info is added. For instance, i cannot get consensus to add to the main article that Thompson contacted the Seattle police department by fax with the request to start a criminal investigation for harassment and extortion against Penny-Arcade, even with 2-3 lines. I will agree that this article as it stands is a POV fork though, and needs severe cleanup, not in the least for violating verifiability rules regarding blog/forum posts (basicly, they count as primary sources and thus using them in the article constitutes original research). SanderJK 11:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unnecessary Forking?
Talk:Lübeck Cathedral

message: *Corresponding English-language article: Lübeck Cathedral
*Worth doing because: stub
*Originally Requested by: Kusma (討論) 21:18, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:de:Lübecker Dom]] 
Talk:Madea's Family Reunion

message: According to Yahoo!, IMDb, and Office Box Mojo, the official title of the film is Tyler Perry's Madea's Family Reunion.  Should the article's title be changed?  =D  Jumping cheese 01:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That, and article titles should generally be kept as short and simple as possible. android79 15:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Record collecting

message: The "most valuable records" section seems like original research to me and therefore should probably be removed. Perhaps a section on rare or highly valued records is worthwhile, but should be sourced. Unless people feel otherwise, I'll remove it. norm77 17:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research?

message: As a collector myself, I have to declare an interest. But also, being poor, I am somewhat detached from most of the financial excesses. I have a set of UK Record Collector magazines, which regularly updates on the "most collectable". I've recently contributed to an article about an album which was offered on eBay and reached $300. In the UK, that's unusual (except for my own collection, he he). There is a slight distinction to be drawn between eBay stuff (which might be optimistic) and auction house (such as Sotheby's, Christie's & Philips) stuff, where experts have a better overview of the markets, and more experience. I see there's an issue about POV and Verifiability in this article, which I think is going to be difficult to deal with, since we are dealing with a somewhat moving target. However, I would like to contribute, and if you don't like my edits, feel free to revert. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 03:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just blew in from the Windy City 

message: who is this SFD person listed as a notable record collector of noise/black metal etc.? Some one please delete him. Also, are there other more significant people we could list?
--Suzy creamcheese (talk) 21:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SFD: notable?? 

message: I think that an additional two categories should be considered for inclusion.  There are a group of collectors who try to acquire as many different record labels as possible.  This is particularly true of 78rpm collectors.  There are also collectors who collect unusual physical specimens (odd shapes, colors, sizes, speeds) regardless of recorded content.  I suppose the problem would be to find a verifiable source for this, as most of the resources are in various collectors discussion groups.  Settlet (talk) 14:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of collection
Talk:Mosibudi Mangena

message: The spelling Mosiblidi Mangena has been used on some Wikipedia pages and other websites. However I think this is a typo for Mosibudi which I have seen used on many other sites. Azapo's site uses both spellings , . Zaian 19:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: According to recent press reports, Mr Mangena has been sworn in as Science and Technology Minister. Can someone in the know confirm this and amend the article accordingly ? See http://www.mg.co.za/article/2008-09-27-hogan-eyes-change-in-sa-healthcare-system for the reference. 82.37.186.43 (talk) 10:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates
Talk:DJ Aligator

message: Robert 00:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: then do something good and edit it yourself. stupid editors..... always push the delete button  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iulian28ti (talk • contribs) 20:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Twisted Nerve

message: David Ennals is quoted as commenting on the film while Secretary of State for Health, with an unlinked Guardian citation of 7 December 1968. Ennals was not the Secretary of State for Health until the 1970s. As of 1 November 1968, the Secretary of State for Health was Richard Crosssman. Without taking out a subscription to a newspaper archive service, I can't check the Guardian for the cited date.
Tullyvallin (talk) 12:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the Guardian reference, he was described there as 'Minister of State for Health'. In another Guardian article, it reported that on 1 November that year, he was to be one of two ministers of state, health and social security, under the Secretary of State, Mr Crossman. I've updated the text to better reflect this, and removed the dubious tag. Scottkeir (talk) 18:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Human image synthesis

message: So, I went ahead and removed NPOV material, added some sources (you'll need a subscription to view them), and removed the hoax tag.  Somebody PLEASE find some more sources that people can verify without paying anything.  Zelmerszoetrop 01:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  I am still not sure this article needs to exist separately from Computer-generated imagery, but this is an improvement. I moved your comment from the page to here.  -- Gnetwerker 02:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revamp!

message: I removed the pseudo-definitions of clonebot and synbot.  The first is in FOLDOC and elsewhere, and means something completely different.  The latter does not exist in the purported usage outside of this article. -- Gnetwerker 02:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed ''clonebot'' and ''synbot''

message: Not used or explained in article. 86.159.197.174 (talk) 03:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "clonebot" redirect here? 