Talk:Poitevin horse

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.poitevin.org/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 06:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello, I note some possible problems with review : 
*"Isabelle" in french is not "isabelline" : the classification of horse coats colors is rudimentary and by "isabelle" we can mean the bay with dun gene or the bay with cream gene... There's no Poitevin Cremello so I suppose this is the dun gene. 
*primes = prims, not premiums ;) 
Nothing else for the moment --Tsaag Valren (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the coat color description, so it should be correct now. What is "prims"? Thanks for the check - it's much appreciated! Dana boomer (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

text: something like bounty, bonus, gift...? --Tsaag Valren (talk) 10:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I think I've taken care of this. Thanks so much! Anything else? Dana boomer (talk) 19:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps ! We have also a problem with official coat color "nomenclature" (don't know the english for nomenclature), which is required to all breeders and owners, it's not like in the U.S., here you have no national structure who oversees the entire equine industry. So, official coat color "nomenclature" is wrong and use the name "noir pangaré" (black pangaré), but we know that seal brown (seal brown = black pangaré) is not result of black coat color with pangaré gene. We have a name that is official and erroneous and are forced to use it. Beurk. Perhaps you should precise the problem of horse coat color name in the article to clarify it ? With a "note" ? Nothing else, good job ! (When I was a little girl i was fascinate by the mustangs, so if you work this article one day just say to me) ;) --Tsaag Valren (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: So are you saying that they're actually seal brown, but they're called black pangare? If I'm reading that right, I can definitely change it in the article text. Dana boomer (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes ! Official name = Noir pangaré in french (black pangaré), but genetically it's the seal brown coat color ;) --Tsaag Valren (talk) 21:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I think I've addressed this. I've added it into the text itself, rather than as a note, because I think it's quite relevant to the discussion of color and registration. The Mustang article definitely needs work, hopefully sooner rather than later, so I'll let you know if and when we start on that! Dana boomer (talk) 21:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.equinekingdom.com/breeds/heavy_horses/poitevin.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Poitevin horse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130407224054/http://www.chevalpoitevin.com/Page/ArticleViewer.aspx?Id=26 to http://www.chevalpoitevin.com/Page/ArticleViewer.aspx?Id=26
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130407222342/http://www.chevalpoitevin.com/Page/ArticleViewer.aspx?Id=13 to http://www.chevalpoitevin.com/Page/ArticleViewer.aspx?Id=13
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130407224029/http://www.chevalpoitevin.com/Page/ArticleViewer.aspx?Id=28 to http://www.chevalpoitevin.com/Page/ArticleViewer.aspx?Id=28
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509060516/http://www.poitevin.org/memoire/mulassier.pdf to http://www.poitevin.org/memoire/mulassier.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: ... is apparently going to be on the front page of Wikipedia in a few weeks' time. It doesn't seem to be anywhere near ready for that. I'd be prepared to do some copy-editing, try to remove some of the translationese, the misunderstandings of the source text(s), and so on – unless of course anyone objects? (Note: I read French without difficulty) If I do that, I'll also restore the list-defined referencing which was removed without discussion with this edit in 2013 and replaced with the present mishmash, which is neither flesh nor fowl. Unless anyone asks me not to, I'll probably go ahead with this in a day or two. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have to redo the blurb, but before I do that ... does anyone object to the re-written lead? Since the FAC nominator hasn't edited in a while, I'll ping the remaining FAC supporters: Montanabw, Jim, Giants2008, and GermanJoe. - Dank (push to talk) 01:44, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Justlettersandnumbers, . Just a heads-up that the TFA for this horse may be postponed to a later date. There is a date-linked FAC that I'll run on 7 July if it is promoted in time, in which case this will be postponed, although I'll run it in October if it's not used by another TFA coordinator before then, so neither the copyedit nor the blurb will be wasted either way. I don't have any problem with the lead, although I know nothing about horses Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:58, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  The style of LDR referencing you changed everything to is not standard for FAC, in fact, by putting page numbers in the text and not the footnotes, it actually makes a real mess of things.  I have never taken an article to FAC in this condition and I do need to correct all of these to the citation templates. The height without conversion templates is also not standard for WPEQ FAC-quality articles.  I know that per our WP:TRUCE I've not carped about this issue on "your" articles, but this is a TFA nom and thus a little different standard applies. Montanabw(talk) 22:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

text: Unwatching here ... tweaks are welcome to the October 7 blurb. - Dank (push to talk) 14:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article ...