lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Simo Matavulj

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 17:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Leaders of the Ku Klux Klan

message: nathan bedford forrest was the first leadears 1867 to 1869. 202.186.108.228 (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: From Forrests' wiki article: "the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan from 1867 to 1869." Mosi Nuru (talk) 01:22, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 May 2021 

message: It seems to me that this article should be merged with Grand Wizard. The subject matter is identical. Mosi Nuru (talk) 01:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Grand Wizard
Talk:Tvrdoš Monastery

message: Tvrdoš haven't been destroyed by Ottomans, but by Venice. You should check historical evidence before writing such things.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.176.244.54 (talk) 00:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for suggestion.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venice destroyed Tvrdoš, not Ottomans
Talk:Sin Boon Ann

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 22:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Category talk:World War I

message: * The Ottoman Empire and World War I (this would a good home for the Armenian articles, in a sub-sub-category)
* France and World War I (Deliberately broader than military operations etc)
* Belgium and World War I (as above)
* Causes of World War I (we have an aftermath but not a formermath)
Thoughts? Roger 21:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible sub-category gaps

message: We have both:
* World War I military equipment
* World War I equipment
Could these be combined into the latter?
Thoughts? Roger 22:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication

message: I was just looking through the various sub-categories of :Category:History of Australia and spotted this one, which seemed a bit out of place. I mean, sure, Australia took part in World War I, but the War is hardly a subset of Australian history. So I decided to look at the other parent cats for :Category:World War I, and was astounded at how many "History of country X" categories there are. (I'm not concerned about the "Wars involving country X" categories, which are inherently different.) Was there ever a discussion about this, and agreement that this was appropriate? 
As a rule, when most of the articles in Category X have nothing to do with potential parent Category Y, then Category X should not be made a subcategory of Category Y -- only the specific relevant articles of Category X should be included in Category Y. But that has been disregarded here. So I'd appreciate any light that can be shed on this situation. (Please alert me at my talk page if you reply here. Thanks!) Cgingold 13:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have converted the Australian parent category from :Category:History of Australia to :Category:Wars involving Australia, which I just created. Perhaps the other parent cats should be dealt with in similar fashion. Cgingold 14:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many parent categories?
Talk:James Pickering

message: The article claims, without documentation, that his wife was Elizabeth de Greystoke. His History of Parliament biography (http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1386-1421/member/pickering-sir-james-1398) actually says that his wife's identity is unknown. John Watson, on soc.genealogy.medieval (http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2013-02/1359862206), has shown that his wife was actually named Agnes, citing Final Concords For Lancashire, Part 3, 1377-1509 (originally published by Record Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, Edinburgh, 1905), pp., 19-43, viewable at http://www.british-history.ac.uk/lancs-final-concords/vol3/pp19-43 (search on "Pykeryng"). Elizabeth Greystoke (1265-1328) appears to have been his paternal grandmother, not his wife. pnh (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: His wife
Talk:James Thorburn (colonial administrator)

message: http://home.swipnet.se/~w-10723/genealog/dat22.html gives a birth date of 4 October 1864, but I don't think it passes reliable  source. Might help someone track down a reliable source though. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date
Talk:Mingering Mike

message: You stated in a previous edit summary that you believe there is enough online material to verify the subject's notability.  I agree, and I will go ahead and delete the speedy deletion notice, but I believe it would be wise to include a more robust claim to notability in the body of the article itself (I am not sure that popularity (i.e. Internet celebrity) is necessarily a guarantee of notability under WP:N.). --BassoProfundo 21:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the process of removing the speedy deletion template, it appears that I also managed to erase text that you had added while I was typing my previous comment.  It seems that this text cannot be found in the history files, but is available through a differences page.  Feel free to restore what you had written, and let me know if I made any technical error to cause the problem. --BassoProfundo 21:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

text: After looking over the history a little more, it appears that the text you had written before was deleted when you added the hangon template.  Hopefully you are able to recover everything; however, I still recommend including a stronger claim to notability in the article. --BassoProfundo 21:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: M4bwav
Talk:Sir Thomas Temple, 1st Baronet, of Stowe

message: I know nothing about the subject of this article (why I was looking at it) but the editor who wrote this "Although Thomas Temple is said to have been born at Burton Dassett in Warwickshire, the eldest son of John Temple and Susan (née Spencer), this seems improbable as his baptism on 9 January 1566/7 is recorded at Everton, Northamptonshire, the childhood home of his mother" seems unaware of two things: it was usual for a bride to be married from her own parish,  it was traditional to take the first-born child back to the priest that married the parents to show that the marriage had been fruitful. 
The WP editor's supposition is likely wrong. Eddaido (talk) 05:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth - probable WP mistake
Talk:Siti Wan Kembang

message: How exactly does one use a GNU-licensed picture from a foreign language Wiki? I'd like to add it to the article but I don't know how: http://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail:Cik_Siti_Wan_Kembang_%28U%29.jpg Asarelah (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Portrait from foreign language wiki
Talk:Petermann Ranges (Antarctica)

message: I found several red links in this article.  If their subjects are notable, articles about them should be created, but if not, the red links should be removed. --Shruti14 t c s 16:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Links 

message: There are also a  range of  hills in Central Australia called  the Petermann ranges.  should there be a disambiguation page or something to cover both?
pete (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page needed?
Talk:Prince Charles Mountains

message: Apparently the Bainmedart Coal Measures lie within this area:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0070707
Do we have any more on this subject?©Geni (talk) 01:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Coal Measure
Talk:Sondok

message: I am curious is the spelling Sŏndŏk is actually correct (phonetically apparently), or if that is a fabrication of an author.  I just read a book about her, and noticed that her name is spelled just Sondok here.  Not a big deal, just wondering!  Justi521 04:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sŏndŏk or Sondok?
Talk:Foreign relations of Saint Lucia

message: Regarding the list diplomatic missions in St. Lucia, TingMing changed Taiwan (which was linked to the ROC) to ROC. The other countries are all listed by their common name, so I suggest to change them into their official name, or change ROC back to Taiwan (which I think is better).
ROC on Taiwan would be confusing, because it's a list of diplomatic missions in St. Lucia. That would just make it really confusing.--Jerrypp772000 21:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan
Talk:Levitation of saints

message: As it appears that they do not fulfill Wikipedia image policy, I have removed the two pictures that were previously found on this page. --BassoProfundo 21:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I have removed the above name from the list on the basis that he is neither a Roman Catholic, nor, so far as I can determine, considered a saint by any Christian sect. If anyone can provide sources to the contrary on either point, of course, I would have no objections to his return to the list. John Carter 00:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon Magus 

message: "Jesus Christ of Nazareth is reported to have levitated in the Bible.  "
I removed the above text from the article. I can recall no actual instance of Jesus levitating above the ground or flying as recorded in scripture. The closest would be his ascension, but the biblical text doesn't actually say he flew or levitated, just that he was "taken up" or "taken away." Works of art sometimes show Jesus appearing to suspended mid-air during the ascension, but that is the artist and the tradition they work in. --Iacobus 06:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus Christ 

message: I find the explanation about Nagendranath Bhaduri a bit wordy and cumbersome with all the explanations about the yogi techniques. Maybe someone more knowledgable about this would like to edit it? --Antihelios (talk) 14:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Indian Saints

message: This yogi seems to be spelled in different ways: Gyaneshwar, Jnanadev or Jnaneshwar (Lord of Jnana or knowledge).
"Jnandev and his brothers saw him coming pompously; so to give him proper respect they ask the wall on which they were seated to move and take them quickly to welcome him. Chang Dev was wonder-struck at this miracle, that is, seeing them coming on an inanimate wall through the air and was humbled." http://www.hvk.org/articles/0702/75.html
As I don't have much of a clue about Indian historic or mythological personalities I won't edit that stuff in the article, though. --Antihelios (talk) 14:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gyaneshwara

message: This article does not mention Saint Ignatius of Loyola. According to the book "Phenomena", he did his meditation while suspended in the air, several feet above ground. Rollo August (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We need complete bibliographic information about the book (at a minimum author, publisher, date of publication), page numbers for the relevant information, and quotations to verify what you are stating. We need some indication of how reliable the author and book are. Anyone can self-publish a book. Sundayclose (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Ignatius of Loyola
Talk:Spiros Latsis

message: Is it not Spyros Latsis? A.Cython (talk) 00:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Germans Media accuse Latsis to be a big benificiary of the european bailout:
*http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/world-news/2010/04/30/greece-bail-out-cash/why-is-german-taxpayers-money-going-to-greek-billionaire.html (german tabloid newspaper, but in english)
*http://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/spirolatsis100.html (news of the biggest federal broadacasting company, but in german)
Perhaps it is worth to mention in the article. --Flegmon (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accusations on Latsis from German media

message: The Barroso paragraph mentions "allegations" without source - not exactly in line with general Wikipedia rules, let alone the guidelines on biographies of living persons.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.169.40.7 (talk) 19:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barroso 
Talk:I, Robot (1964 The Outer Limits)

message: Storyline is very similar to the story of B1-66ER -- any relation? 21:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Animatrix 

message: The opening and closing control voice speeches here are tagged for citation neeeded, about time to remove them surely? None of the other Control voice intro/outros on the other Outer Limits eps pages are tagged (I hope), why are these? 81.111.127.132 (talk) 14:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to remove citation tags? 

message: Why was Red Morgan, the actor who played the main character
Adam Link (the Robot) uncredited? -96.233.21.212 (talk) 04:01, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Morgan main character uncredited
Talk:Whitby Public Library

message: I have place a NPOV disputed tag on the article. My reason for doing this is that the article is about a library in Canada and that the author is a librarian from Canada, probably from the same area as the library, as stated in the user's userpage. This leads me to think that there may be a conflict of interest, and, therefore, that the article may not be written from a neutral point of view. If the author, User:Blotto_adrift, can prove that there is no conflict of interest, I will gladly remove the tag. BoricuaeddieTalk • Contribs • Spread the love!  21:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The author has confirmed the conflict of interest and I have reported the incident to the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard. BoricuaeddieTalk • Contribs • Spread the love!  01:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The article has been shortened somewhat per comments on the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard.  Otherwise, a ruling is awaited.  Blotto adrift 19:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions

message: I split the Whitby Library today section into two parts. One section to the Brooklin Library, the remainder to he introduction. This gives a stronger lead paragraph to the article, and provides continuity to the Brooklin section. Flibirigit 16:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rearranging

message: Photos will be adding Wednesday morning, May 16, for the main downtown branch, and the Old Carnegie Library. Flibirigit 21:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: It has been ruled that Blotto Adrift is in conflict of interest.  Therefore any edits made by him should be changed back and wiki should be notified.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.51.121 (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no conflict of interest with the article. It is factual, referenced, and neutral. Flibirigit (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The edits of  appear to be vandalism. He pays no attention to the fact that the COI complaint about Whitby Public Library was resolved long ago. His improvements seem to consist of removing text and images contributed by Blotto Adrift to the article. This IP may be related to the one involved in an edit war at Trenton, Ontario. In that case an IP was edit warring to include the name 'Jason Michelakos' in the article on Trenton.  Admins wound up protecting that article twice, most recently stating  'Continued vandalism by anonymous IP'.  EdJohnston (talk) 18:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I added the images. See above section. Flibirigit (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, thank you :-)  EdJohnston (talk) 21:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing by Blotto Adrift
Talk:Dubai Desert Rock Festival

message: I know nothing about this topic, but someone who does should maybe help spruce up the grammar on this page for clarity a bit better than I can! Gun Yoshi (talk) 20:25, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar
Template talk:Severe weather terminology (United States) navbox

message: I created this navigation box because that is what I do.  I am not a weather expert.  Please add/change/delete as appropriate.--Old Hoss 21:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New 

message: I don't know if the Flood PDS watch exists. We'll look into that after. 74.12.126.46 (talk) 02:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be at least issued once (http://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/vtec/#2011-O-NEW-KMEG-FF-A-0006 update 5); however, it would be different from other PDS watches, as Flood Watches are issued by the local forecast offices, not the Storm Prediction Center, so there may not be a uniform definition for a PDS Flood Watch. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of the alerts are just pretend... 

message: It is my goal to get most of the products issued by the National Weather Service on here (and as part of that goal, I have been created pages for products that do not yet have pages); however, I do not plan on including the statements for the various products, as they typically are just updates of the initual product.  If somebody wants to put something together as a general page that talks about Statements, then that could probably be included as well. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As of now, I do not plan on including Excessive Cold Watch/Warning, since they're still in the experimental phase.  If the NWS deciddes to make them official products, then I'll make articles for them and add them to the template as well. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Torpig

message: It spreads using vulnerabilities and without end-user interaction; it is a worm.  --John Moser (talk) 01:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed the category from Trojan to Botnet as it does "spread without end-user interaction" but is also organized based on the bot herder needs Utopiah (talk) 12:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a worm 

message: Media reporting on the capabilities of trojans and viruses is notoriously inaccurate. Can we get some real technical information on how this spreads and how it steals data? Rhobite (talk) 22:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yes we certainly can: http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~seclab/projects/torpig/torpig.pdf -- Hoary (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Didn't see this on the talk page, added it a bit earlier in the "External links" section of the page and cleaned it a bit Utopiah (talk) 11:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical info 

message: We need to add a disclaimer that states that scammers are using this wiki page to deceive people to give them access to their computer.
72.208.75.136 (talk) 05:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to add disclaimer that scammers are using this wiki page
Talk:Tomoko

message: Is this correct? In Chinese, this means "time". Maybe a Japanese speaker could check and change accordingly.
95.112.155.158 (talk) 18:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: 时间 shí​jiān is most definitely "time" in Simplified Chinese (the traditional Chinese is 時間). I checked the Simplified characters on a Japanese dictionary, Jisho ( http://www.jisho.org ) and no match appears at all. The Japanese character equivalent is 時間 (じかん Jikan), which uses the same characters as Traditional Chinese. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:55, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: 时间 - "mature child"
Talk:The Royal Guardsmen

message: "currently" is not a good word to use in wikipedia. Please tell the date. :-) 87.78.226.66 21:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The main body of the article and the section listing record releases are contradictory. The article states that Laurie Records in Canada did not at first release "Snoopy vs. the Red Baron" because Schulz had not given his permission, and that another "Snoopy" record was released instead (which doesn't really make sense if you think about it -- why would that one be OK?). The article states that "Snoopy vs. the Red Baron" only came out in Canada later on. Yet the chart shows it being a huge hit in Canada the same year it was a hit everywhere else. Both can't be true, can they? Jeri Southern (talk) 04:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Snoopy vs. The Red Baron" in Canada
Talk:Kevin P. Ryan

message: Two of the companies which he founded have Wikis of their own (PantherExpress and Double Click).  His businesses have been the topic of business discussion for magazines, blogs, newspapers and other sources.  He is credited for developing and directing DoubleClick's growth into a multi-million dollar corporation, one of the first to do so after the dot.com boom of the 1990s, the same DoubleClick that has been making news regarding is $3.1 Billion Deal with Google.
Kevin Ryan is one of the top CEOs and leaders of innovative business in the Web 2.0 movement.
Ndo204 21:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled