Talk:Sitakunda Upazila

message: See this controversy about the eco park: http://www.sdnbd.org/sdi/news/pages/eco-park/eco-park.htm --Dr.saptarshi 04:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's this Hazarikhil Wildlife Sanctuary that is partly in Sitakunda (see: IUCN Directory]). Aditya(talk • contribs) 12:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eco-park

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 10 kilometers, use 10 kilometers, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 10 kilometers.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
*As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.[?]
*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
**it is claimed
**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?] 
*Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), meter (A) (British: metre), metre (B) (American: meter), organize (A) (British: organise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization).
*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 19:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automated [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Sitakunda Upazila/archive1|peer review]] 

message: Due to the prose errors and sentence errors, I decided to quick fail the GAN. miranda 04:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: ===Taken out in the Lead===
The environmental impact and human rights standards of the industry is facing much complains.The Continuous Evasion Of The "Polluter Pays Principle"; Greenpeace; September 2002; Retrieved: 2007-09-03
The first eco-park in Bangladesh was established in 2001.Eco-park, Banglapedia: The National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh, Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Retrieved: 2007-08-24
===History===
What does the legend have to do with archaeologist discovery? I took this out.
According to legends, great sage Bhargava created a pond (kunda) for Sita Devi to bathe when her hausban Lord Ramchandra visited this place during his exile in the forests.Prem Ranjan Dev, Of Shiva Chaturdashi and Sitakunda, The Daily Star, Point Counter-Point, 2007-02-17; Retrieved: 2007-12-31
*[Fakhruddin Mubarak Shah]] - where's the dynasty?
*I stopped copyediting after the second paragraph
*Many repetitions of words throughout the article
*Avoid using: it, here, there are (and variations)
Paragraph structure for a good/featured article:
#Intro
#Claim
#:Supporting evidence
#:Supporting evidence
#Conclusion
*Sentence fragments: In September 29, 2006. Anwarul Kabir Talukder, the State Minister for Power, lost his job In September 29, 2006 when hundreds of protesters in Sitakunda blocked the Dhaka–Chittagong highway and violence erupted elsewhere in Bangladesh in demand of electricity.[66]
*Refs. aren't according to WP:CITE. miranda 05:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mini-Review 

message: What does the legend have to do with archaeologist discovery? I took this out.
According to legends, great sage Bhargava created a pond (kunda) for Sita Devi to bathe when her hausban Lord Ramchandra visited this place during his exile in the forests.Prem Ranjan Dev, Of Shiva Chaturdashi and Sitakunda, The Daily Star, Point Counter-Point, 2007-02-17; Retrieved: 2007-12-31
*[Fakhruddin Mubarak Shah]] - where's the dynasty?
*I stopped copyediting after the second paragraph
*Many repetitions of words throughout the article
*Avoid using: it, here, there are (and variations)
Paragraph structure for a good/featured article:
#Intro
#Claim
#:Supporting evidence
#:Supporting evidence
#Conclusion
*Sentence fragments: In September 29, 2006. Anwarul Kabir Talukder, the State Minister for Power, lost his job In September 29, 2006 when hundreds of protesters in Sitakunda blocked the Dhaka–Chittagong highway and violence erupted elsewhere in Bangladesh in demand of electricity.[66]
*Refs. aren't according to WP:CITE. miranda 05:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Sitakunda has one cyclone shelter, each with a capacity of sheltering 50 to 60 people, for about 5,000 people — 11 at Syedpur Union, seven at Baraiyadhala, four each at Sitakunda municipality, Barabkunda, Bhatiary and Bansbaria, eight at Muradpur, five at Kumira, two at Sonaichhari and three at Salimpur Union. 
Pls clarify the line, Sitakunda has one cyclone shelter. Do u mean that there is one shelter at Sitakunda town??? Amartyabag  TALK2ME 06:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the current copy work alright? Aditya(talk • contribs) 08:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pls clarify 

message: *"The fledgling ship breaking industry began in 1964 when Chittagong Steel House started scrapping MD Alpince, a 20,000 metric tons (19,684 LT) Greek ship that had been accidentally beached near Fouzdarhat by a tidal bore four years earlier ... The ship breaking industry formally started in 1974 when Karnafully Metal Works started scrapping Al Abbas, a Pakistani ship damaged in 1971." I'm uncleat what "formally" means in this context. Did the indusry start in 1964 or 1974? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 14:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Tweaked a bit more. I hope it imparts some sense now. Sorry about the confusing prose that was (my bad). Please, check. Aditya(talk • contribs) 06:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  removed  Keeper  |  76  |  Disclaimer 16:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

text:  rephrased for clarity  Keeper  |  76  |  Disclaimer 16:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Tweaked a bit more to clarify what happened. Please, check. Aditya(talk • contribs) 06:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

text:  changed to hectares  Keeper  |  76  |  Disclaimer 17:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The third round of issues

message: I was the original copyeditor for this article, making around 200-250 grammatical changes in late December (or possibly early January).  I'll look over it again a bit today, but it is a weekend and I won't have much access to a PC today (about another hour) and no access tomorrow.  I'll attack it again on Monday!  Cheers,  Keeper  |  76  |  Disclaimer 16:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, take a look at the lead when you can. It apparently is unbalanced (i.e. more emphasis on pilgrimage sites than the rest). Aditya(talk • contribs) 18:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the lead is fine (better balanced) how it reads at this timestamp. One man's opinion though.   Keeper  |  76  |  Disclaimer 16:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyediting

message: Reviewers have to tread a fine line between commenting on an article and contributing to it; I feel that I'm in danger of stepping over that line, and therefore may not be able in all conscience to provide a properly disinterested decision at the end of the hold period.
The outstanding issue for me remains the need for copyediting, to which I have tried to contribute as much as I can. If that issue can be addressed within the hold period, then I will still be prepared to pass this article, but as the reviewer I don't feel I can contribute any more myself without compromising my neutrality. One thing I will promise though is that if I do have to fail this article, then I will do everything I can to help the editors get it up to the GA standard, for another reviewer to decide. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Treading a fine line

message: Well, quite a marathon this one, but I now feel happy to list this article as a GA. Particular thanks have to go to Aditya Kabir for responding with patience to my apparently never-ending list of issues and to Keeper76 for substantially contributing to the major task of copyediting.
Congratulations to everyone involved with this article! --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's great news!!  Congrats go to Aditya!  Well done!  Keeper  |  76  |  Disclaimer 21:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Passed 

message: I tried with google but couldn't find any material that supports this claim. It seems that some third party references are supporting Alang as world's largest ship breaking yard 1. Can't we modify this claim properly? -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 13:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there may be a semantic difference here.  Alang may very well be the largest ship breaking yard (meaning one company I presume?)  Sitakunda, as far as I can read, claims to have (with sources of course) the largest ship breaking industry (implying several yards).  A bad analogy is in order perhaps:  McDonalds is the largest restaurant chain in the world.  Certainly no one would claim it to be the largest restaurant though.  Keeper  |  76  |  Disclaimer 15:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You have figured out a nice point. As an industry (not as a single firm or yard) it is probably the largest one. We need a third party reference. I'll let you know if I get one. Cheers. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 16:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There already are more than one. Just go through the article. It's not generally recommended that you put cites in the lead, unless the lead is the only material you have. If and when you work on an article, please, try to put in-line citations in the body, not the lead. The lead is a summary of the body, not stand alone text. For use of the lead see WP:LEAD. The lead section you tagged had about 20 or so in-line cites, which were removed as per the GA review. If you checked the history you would have known that too. Thanks. Aditya(talk • contribs) 17:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I got it boss :-). -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 19:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: World's largest ship breaking yard claim

message: The issues raised need to be worked on. Aditya(talk • contribs) 11:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Aditya(talk • contribs) 09:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed FAC 

message: আমার দেশ
 Mdsarwaruddinctg (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bangladesh 

message: Dear Anomie, you marked the section as non-free. Can you explain please? Thank you for your cooperation. - Rafi Bin Tofa (talk) 07:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No I didn't. That was User:Aditya Kabir in this edit. Anomie⚔ 14:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked with Earwig's Copyvio Detector and it had almost 30% confidence that copyvio has occured. Since I hope to put the article to FA discussion someday, this level of confidence is not very acceptable. :D Aditya(talk • contribs) 17:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Aditya, first of all please clear the fact to me about copyvio. Does it mean i copied the text and then put it in the section? Thank you. - Rafi Bin Tofa (talk) 04:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it definitely doesn't. 30% confidence means there are enough exact phrases from the sources kept in the copy that can indicate a copyvio. I can fix the problem myself, or you can do that too. Aditya(talk • contribs) 05:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your cooperation. Please help me out by fixing it. - Rafi Bin Tofa (talk) 09:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Not necessarily. It just indicates there is a possibility of copyvio. The linked article is 47 pages long and the offending section is half a dozen sentences. However it is so poorly written and the context is completely missing that I am just going to remove it as an editorial decision. I am not saying if it is or isn't a violation. AIRcorn (talk) 09:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

text: , thank you for your contribution. I admit that, i written the section poorly. I will give my full effort to create a goodly written texts in future. Again, Thank you.- Rafi Bin Tofa (talk) 07:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bangladesh Liberation War in Sitakunda