Talk:Paraclete

message: The Islamic section of the article is littered with unreferenced claims and weasel words. Perhaps some knowledgable muslim could correct the text. At the very least provide references. I am too ignorant regarding the Paraclete/Mohammad debate to comment. 128.214.133.2 (talk) 10:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel words

message: The Greek word for "spirit" is πνεύμα (pneuma), and this is the term used in the expression "Holy Spirit." The Gospel of John speaks of "another Paraclete" (comforter or advocate) to designate the presence and action of the Holy Spirit when Jesus is no longer visibly present to his followers. Faylei (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paraclete (correction)

message: "the pneuma moves where He wants to and you are hearing His voice, but do not know where He comes from or where He is going." (see John chapter 3). Before he died, he told his followers that they knew the pneuma (for he had been speaking through Jesus for three years). - according to whom? I've seen no Bible translation that expresses this (NIV, KJV, NKJV, CSB or ASB.) If this phrase cannot be backed up with some kind of notation then it should be at least qualified ("according to some people") if not deleted altogether.4bigGuy9 (talk) 17:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Talks Through Jesus"

message: All of the references to the Arabian chap came from...? The "Jesus(PBUH)" isn't an act of vandalism then...194.46.240.65 00:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hijacking

message: This page and Gospel of Barnabas contradict each other on what "periklutos" means -- besides which, neither one seems to be right. Periklutos means "heard of all around"; i.e. "famous" -- not "comforter" or "advocate" or "admirable one". Besides, the similarity in consonants between the two words does not imply any relation (as it would in a Semitic language such as Arabic). 71.82.214.160 06:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like paracletos (παράκλητος) is the biblical word translated to "comforter" or "advocate" (source: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/παράκλητος#Ancient_Greek), while periklutos (περικλῠτός) is "the famous" or "the excellent" (source: http://perseus.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.57:8:114.LSJ). I also noticed that Google translates περικλυτος into "wraps". (?) Still, the article is using "periklytos" while the quotes use "periklutos". Why? Markuswestermoen (talk) 10:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the difference in spelling may be from the actual references and the manner those authors spelled the word (either using a "y" or "u"), but I'd have to look at the references a bit closer. I'm not sure if other editors would have issue if one spelling was to be used for the sake of conformity, but if that is how they were originally written by whoever published their work, I think it wouldn't be so much an issue of confusion or mistake, but choice in use when translating...and thus my opinion is that they should be as they were originally published. -- HafizHanif (talk) 16:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Periklutos

message: When I review the biblical links for the term Paraclete, I get nothing but a list of Bibles from which to choose. What would be better is to link to an exact translation that uses paraclete. If paraclete is not used in any translation, then linking to a bible verse is senseless. Any help?--StormRider 22:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Paraclete is the transliteration of the original Greek. Most versions translate it into a common English word. The verses you are told about are the ones where paraclete is used in the original. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry this took so long to respond and I have not checked the article again. However, the reference should link directly to a supporting reference or explanation of the statement. The current reference is useless. My understanding echos your comment above, but the reference still needs to be improved. Do you have one on hand? -StormRider 19:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any exact links to verses possible? 

message: Words derived from proper nouns are capitalised, like British, Christian and Trinitarian. Also titles are capitalised: thus The Duke of Erewhon is a lord, but Jesus is Lord. Likewise the Holy Spirit is a counsellor, but he is also Counsellor. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation 

message: The section "Paraclete in Islam" states "However, there is no textual evidence to support the claim, other than the fact that vowels were not used in the original greek language".
While a citation for this is given for this "fact", its absolutely wrong.  The vowels in the ancient Greek alphabet are alpha, epsilon, eta, iota, omicron, upsilon, and omega.
I have added a sentence pointing out this inaccuracy.  For verification I have included a link to the most prestigious Greek Grammar in English, Smyth's entry on the Greek Alphabet, where the grammmar makes clear that some of the ancient Greek letters are vowels.
An editor should review this article to figure out how to resolve this.
And we should review this article in order to understand it...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vorsap (talk • contribs) 10:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Inaccuracy - Ancient Greek had Vowels 

message: The term of paraklete is not a holy spirit, because the sentence st. John's Gospel "...another paraklete..." was inappropriate to be "..another holy spirit...". With my best regards.
The above objection is invalid, e.g. "I will give you another gift, a Ferrari" is not disproven nor proven by substituting it in the phrase itself, even with only one Ferrari existing in the context.   
Similarly the Deedat's objection in the article is suspiciously naive, as the Holy Spirit had not descended on Apostles earlier, but of course since the guy is notable I do not advocate removing it. 151.51.218.98 (talk) 23:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraclete is he a holy spirit? 

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Paraclete which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.bible-history.com/isbe/P/PARACLETE/
*:Triggered by \bbible\-history\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Paraclete]] 

message: Widr, and others watching this page: is the primary source issue ( in the hope of cleaning up the article and having the primary source template removed ) found mostly in the "In Christianity" section?  I can help find secondary citations for this section and others you can point out. Please reintroduce edits I've removed with proper citations. -- HafizHanif (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The information in the "In Christianity" section is based on secondary scholarly sources. There seems to be no justification for having the primary-source template. Bealtainemí (talk) 14:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your help :) -- HafizHanif (talk) 15:44, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addressing primary source issue 

message: An enormous amount of this article, in the 'In Islam' section, contains swathes of unreliable information and incoherent citations. For example, it cites a book by a Muslim apologist named Ahmed Deedat -- apparently self-published -- a clear violation of WP:RS. In the earlier other part of the section, offering a citation for Ibn Ishaq being the earliest to make a certain interpretation of the Paraclete, the citation looks like this;
"Page 50 "As early as Ibn Ishaq (85-151 AH) the biographer of Muhammad, the Muslims identified the Paraclete - referred to in John's ... "to give his followers another Paraclete that may be with them forever" is none other than Muhammad.""
Well ... page 50 of WHAT? Another citation, regarding the views of contemporary Muslim writers like Martin Liggs, looks like this;
"Al-Masāq: studia arabo-islamica mediterranea: Volumes 9 à 10 ;Volume 9 University of Leeds. Dept. of Modern Arabic Studies, Taylor & Francis - 1997 "Many Muslim writers, including Ibn Hazm, al-Taban, al-Qurtubi, and Ibn Taymiyya, have identified the Paraclete with Muhammad. Probably the first to do so was his biographer Ibn Ishaq in the mid eighth century.""
The citation goes to the journal Al-Masaq, a valid journal. The problem is, of course, that despite this, the citation is still incoherent. It refers to volumes 9 and 10 of the journal. What? Citations can't refer to an entire volume of a journal, they must go to a specific paper. Thus, this reference makes zero sense. Yet another reference, for Christians substituting parkletyos, reads;
""Isa", Encyclopedia of Islam"
The encyclopedia of Islam? Which volume? What pages? This one is at least fixable -- since the Encyclopedia of Islam was written over a century ago, it's on Archive, which means I can probably fix this reference -- but this speaks loudly about the quality of the section at this point. All of this, if not more, needs to be removed.70.49.181.61 (talk) 16:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I've fixed all these problems.70.49.181.61 (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable information