Talk:Human Rights Record of the United States

message: * Shouldn't the China's article be here, and an  disambig be used instead? 132.205.45.110 02:57, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig

message: The article says, "Supporters say that just as the USA is free to criticise the PRC, the PRC should also be free to criticise the USA..."
I have no doubt that this document has its supporters but we need to know who they are.  The critics need to be on the record now so it's never forgotten where they stood.
-- Randy2063 (talk) 17:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supporters need to be identified 

message: What is the original Chinese language title of this report? Would help the article. Nesnad (talk) 17:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese title? 

message: If the tag is citation needed and it's over a year old, it will be deleted.  Now is your chance to find the citation.
Id447 (talk) 21:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation needed clean-up

message: *RE."This section has been truncated to remove facts that an editor finds uncomfortable."
::Please dear friend, assuming good faith is a requirement for editing here. I'm not sure which words are "weasel" as it consists of a quote from a secondary source.
*RE. "At least 15 military interventions have been justified using references to the country's human rights record":
::That goes back to this link Examples of humanitarian intervention which is to a Wikipedia page and is not considered a reliable source. (WP:RS) further, it doesn't reference the  "China Human Rights Report" and most of the examples are not US interventions. (IE. "Russian, British and French Anti-Ottoman Intervention in the Greek War of Independence (1824)"
*RE."The conception and practices of human rights differs in various cultures."
::The first reference goes back to "List of human rights articles by country" which is a wikipedia page and therefore not a reliable source. It also doesn't say what you are saying it says. it's a list of articles. 
::The second source is an essay that doesn't mention the China Human Rights Report or even China or the USA.
Is there some way we could make these edits more congruent with Wikipedia policy? V7-sport (talk) 04:11, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Id447, please do not delete comments by other users. bd2412 T 23:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Re Id447 edits.

message: The section on the 2014 report is given MASSIVELY undue weight in comparison to other reports. It is also repeated. The first part of the section is simply repeated in the second part (indented paragraphs). I have no problem with the content, only the huge amount of it, the duplication of that huge amount, and what appears to me to be WP:NPOV problems. I know very little about this subject, and I have very little time for editing these days, so I would appreciate it if someone else who understands WP policies and guidelines as well as having at least a passing knowledge of the subject looks this over. Is the 2014 report so incredibly important that it should make up most of the article? The page can't stand the way it is. Dcs002 (talk) 01:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Report for 2014 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Human Rights Record of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131119194212/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-04/10/c_13822179.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-04/10/c_13822179.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029151313/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-04/10/c_13822287.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-04/10/c_13822287.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029151313/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-04/10/c_13822287.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-04/10/c_13822287.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131119185441/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-04/10/c_13822320.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-04/10/c_13822320.htm
*Added archive https://archive.is/20051101105804/http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/739/1/80/ to http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/739/1/80/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722012929/http://missions.itu.int/~china/humanrights/usrec2000e.htm to http://missions.itu.int/~china/humanrights/usrec2000e.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706223230/http://www.china-un.ch/eng/rqrd/jzzdh/t85079.htm to http://www.china-un.ch/eng/rqrd/jzzdh/t85079.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified Links (External) 

message: :There are twenty-three entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion. 
*ELpoints #3) states: 
*LINKFARM states: 
*WP:ELMIN: . 
*WP:ELCITE:  --  Otr500 (talk) 19:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I'll be suggesting to add the most recent name of the report here, "The Report on Human Rights Violations in the United States" (the title used in reports from 2019), and further links at "See also" to other relevant articles: whataboutism, propaganda in China, anti-American sentiment in China, wolf warrior diplomacy and And you are lynching Negroes. Looks like the only other page linking here is China–United States relations; looking into have links to this article at the China section of whataboutism (particularly relevant). TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 01:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional title, further "See also" links and missing links