lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Absolute neutrophil count

message: what are Bands that are used to calculate?
:Bands are immature neutrophils.  Not all labs report mature and immature neuts separately. WhatamIdoing 06:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANC  

message: I think the content in this article fits well with, and should be merge with neutrophil granulocyte--Bwthemoose/Talk 16:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. One is about measuring the ratio of different contents, the other is about one of the contents. It would be like merging snow and winter. Totnesmartin (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge article

message: Could anybody please add some part to the article explaining how this counting is carried out in practice? I find it hard to believe that someone is looking through a microscope counting the cells one by one, but what is the alternative? Octonion (talk) 08:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's usually done by machine, but it can be done manually, exactly as you describe.  See Complete blood count#Methods.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 13:44, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are the cells counted?
Talk:Cartwright

message: Could someone make a disambiguation page for other Cartwrights?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.192.150 (talk) 23:59, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved all per nom.  No such user (talk) 13:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 September 2021
Talk:Fascism in the United States

message: The more I think about it, the more I realize this article is original research. Unless someone can produce references to articles about the United States becoming fascist (and not just to elements of that, as is currently done) I think the article should be recommended for deletion. --Alabamaboy 00:36, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there are a number of articles that you could link to about Unified Theory of Physics. I want to see an article by a social scientist or historian who says that the US is now fascist or has fascist elements. After all, in your first draft of the article you stated that this was a widespread belief among social scientist or historic researchers.--Alabamaboy 13:22, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is original research 

message: Folks are messing up four pages now. Fascism, Neo-Fascism, Neo-Nazism, and  Fascism in the United States. Can we please first agree as to whether or not the lengthy material on the U.S. should appear here or be moved in summary form to the Neo-Fascism page?  I would prefer keeping this page, since it will be a magnet for revert wars.  :-)  --Cberlet 14:30, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The info can remain here for now. Eventually, if the editors can produce citations for this article, it can remain permanently. If they can't, then this page--and the edits to other articles--should be removed as original research. While I understand your frustration with the edits to other articles, no one should post original research here. In fact, it sounds like someone is pushing a politcal agenda with this article and the edits to other articles. If someone is doing this and pushing original research on the other articles, that is grounds for those edits to also be deleted.--Alabamaboy 15:51, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Agree on keeping page?

message: Fascism (United States) has been nominated for deletion here. keith 10:24, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fascism (United States) AfD
Talk:Elendor

message: Does the number of registered users include alts? --Sephiroth9611 00:19, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article could stand a serious reorganization and expansion in some areas, namely some more technical aspects behind the game, such as info about the server and the version of PennMUSH being used. It could also be placed in some more categories than just the one that it is included in now. --Sephiroth9611 13:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep in mind though that this is an encyclopedia article not only about game play but the game itself.  It's not an advertisement for Elendor's cultures system.  --Sephiroth9611 14:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization and categories 

message: I just wanted to ensure that it was disclosed that I am a former administrator (wizard) at Elendor, although I have not been a regular player there in some time (I spent 2006 entirely without logging in), although I first logged in in 1993. I will try to avoid any POV mistakes and I don't intend to represent the MUSH. Just happened to bump into the entry and wanted to make sure it was reasonably encyclopedic as I do think Elendor has some importance at least in it's niche. --Dlgoldstein 17:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclosure
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine/Collaboration

message: Shouldn't we remove older requests. There are requests from 2004. :) NCurse work 20:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old requests 

message: I'm kinda lost here... Can someone put a message at the top what the consensus for this discussion was? How are collaborations organised?--Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 09:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, this discussion is older than 1 year. We should create a new system. I'll remove requests older than 2 months. I'll let you know when I'm ready... NCurse  work 10:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Archive is ready. I'll refresh this page regularly... NCurse  work 15:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost 

message: Hello, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask. Another editor advised me to ask this project, but I don't know if this is the right talk page.
I asked on the Talk:Vardenafil page whether a single study comparing it to sildenafil and tadalafil in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension should be mentioned in the article. The study is mentioned in US Respiratory Disease 2006, authored by Manu Jain and Anna P. Lam. The article is available here, and a longer versino for subscribers is available here. According to the article, this one study found that vardenafil did not cause "a significant reduction in the pulmonary to systemic vascular resistance ratio."
Do you think it's worth mentioning this one study in the Vardenafil article, or do you think it should be omitted, pending further studies? Thank you. --Kyoko 19:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  seeking input on [[Vardenafil]]
Talk:Inhibitory postsynaptic current

message: This article is badly written and not very informative.
:An IPSC is a fairly common acronym with a relatively simple definition; however, if you read much in neurobiology you may notice that it is often not defined in the texts themselves.  So, originally the article was written simply to provide an elementary explanation of the idea and how it applies to the basic regime of neurobiology (and the corresponding neurochem therein).  I am not too sure what more can be said, other than lengthy examples of IPSC\EPSC pathways.  I can put some of these up if you think that will make it more informative (or please feel free to if you feel qualified).  Maybe the language can be altered to be more general in the opening paragraph?  I don't necessarily understand what is difficult to understand, and/or what type of "informative" you are hoping to establish?  Suggestions are many times more useful than content-free criticism.   Clearly this article could use expansion, and any help with improving the article is, of course, always appreciated. 128.62.97.227 20:05, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This
Talk:Heteromeles

message: * Asturianu
* Català
* Deutsch
* Español
* Suomi
* Russian
* Français
* Svenska
* Winaray
all have Heteromeles pages unlinked --Dignitee (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link it to other wiki languages, i don't know what's wrong
Talk:Guardian

message: Would prefer to put Guardian (title) on here as I am trying to disambiguate Guardian and it is used as a title on many pages without meaning legal guardian.
I have now written the pages with references - anyone disagree? Pixie2000 21:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guardian (title)

message: Many pages refer to this which are computer games - I see these have been removed in the past - anyone got a suggestion as how I disambiguate them?Pixie2000 21:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guardian (computer games)

message: I've removed the clean-up tag as it's been on for three months and has had a couple of small improvements. I can't see any further problems with the TV section, but if anyone else does, please edit the page or re-tag it. Thanks, Boleyn2 (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up tag

message: A Guardian is also the opposite magical character class of a Wizard, although, one could conceivably be borderline between the two. These are 2 different fictional Universes, but I will contrast the examples anyway: Harry and Link. Obviously, Harry Potter is a Wizard. He may use weapons occasionally, but his expertise is in magic. Although the word "Guardian" is not specifically used in his series, Link is a Guardian. He uses magic at times, but his expertise is in weaponry (sword, shield, boomerang, bombs, archery (bow and arrow), even a hook shot for climbing over walls). 
So, we can include this definition of Guardian as well. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More or less opposite of a Wizard 

message: There are articles for The Guardians (2017 French film) and The Guardians (2017 Russian film). I don't see that one of them is notable enough compared to the other to claim this title. - Donald Albury 15:18, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Russian film is called Guardians -- not The Guardians. — Film Fan 17:19, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The title of the article is The Guardians (2017 Russian film). - Donald Albury 00:39, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it has incorrectly been moved to that title without discussion by , so I am trying to move it back to its correct title. — Film Fan 00:50, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two candidates for this name
Talk:East Baltic race

message: No expert at this at all - still the claim that someone by the name of "Norderstreng" was the - note - "likely" originator of the theory of a Baltic race seems to me utterly unsatisfactory. Even more so, as on googling "Nordenstreng" most hits turn up mirror pages of just this questionable wikipedia reference. So please someone in the know edit this - else it be better deleted. Albrecht Conz 01:03, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nordenstreng is the name given by Gunther as the originator of the concept. He does not give his first name. A look in ther academic library catalogues revealed more than one Nordenstreng who might be the one in questuion, but I could not definitively identify the correct first name. Paul B 11:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rolf Nordenstreng is indentified as the originator on page 248 of Montandon's La Race Les Races. Improving a page by adding to it does require more effort than criticizing or deleting. Shall we build together?209.242.149.240 (talk) 00:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nordenstreng 
Talk:Codariocalyx motorius

message: I just removed this from the main article because I couldn't find a source for these studies anywhere, and don't think that (source?) is very encyclopedic. If anyone can find a source, please return this to the article and link to the source.
:The leaves of this plant are sometimes used to make tea.  Studies performed in the 1960s (source?) suggest that the leaves and roots of Desmodium motorium contain psychedelic compounds, like N,N-dimethyltryptamine.
--Explodicle 01:14, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

message: "This plant reproduces using seeds". Well it says "Angiosperms" in the taxonomy box to the right, doesn't it?  I am removing this superfluous sentence.
--Wdanbae (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seeds 

message: I have not changed anything, but the 4th paragraph states "The Tamils call this plant ThozhukaNNi (Tamil: தொழுகண்ணி). The plant is known as Praanajeewa - ප්රාණජීව in Sri Lanka, due to its movements resembling that there is a life within the plant.[3]"  Could someone please clarify what in the heck Praanajeewa translates to?
-some random dude in here 11/17/2016  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.0.93.58 (talk) 21:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamil name
Talk:Alex (parrot)

message: Terrace seems to be the only source in this section, and his claims are rather bizarre.  He's claiming a Clever Hans effect, yet if you've ever read any of Pepperberg's papers, you'd see that the person asking the questions is kept unaware of the answers, so if there's a Clever Hans effect, then the humans are telepathic, which would be a much bigger result.  ;)  But anyway, noting that would be WP:OR, so nothing can be done about it... -- 213.176.153.100 (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section is weird 

message: I capitalized the name "grey parrot" in the species section of the infobox and had it swiftly reverted by @The Grid with the note that the common name of the species is not capitalized. This is not standard practice on Wikipedia. Take for example the infobox of Koko (the gorilla). Even though "western gorilla" is generally written in lower case letters, the word "western" is capitalized as "Western" in the same section of the template, presumably because it is at the beginning of the cell in the second column. Furthermore, if you look at the rest of Alex's (ie. this page's) infobox, words like "male" and "intelligent" are capitalized as well. Inconsistency is a major eyesore. ~~~~ LinicMarino (talk) 07:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello! You're right that article names are in sentence case. This is usually not the case for infoboxes when it comes to providing text for parameters. The closest policy for infoboxes is MOS:INFOBOXSTYLE but nothing stated about capitalization. MOS:LISTCAPS might be more relevant? Even with your example, it probably should be "western gorilla" for the species. My thought process is these aren't sentences with adding information to the infobox (unless you actually are providing a sentence). I understand there's most likely going to be an inconsistency if you try to look at other articles for animals. You can revert my edit if you would like. – The Grid (talk)  14:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalizing the animal's name in the infobox
Talk:Nuclear navy

message: A point was brought up in nuclear power - there's no discussion of naval nuclear reactors, not even in the History section. Simesa 01:39, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Made a small effort toward fixing this. Simesa 09:00, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear Reactors 

message: Why do we have a section on Ballistic missiles on this page? All the information contained there is redundant; the only thing that ought to be said here, if anything, is that many nuclear navy ships, in particular submarines, are designed to carry ballistic missiles. The information on the missiles themselves should be on the appropriately named separate page. Unless anyone has any objections, I think I'm going to remove that section as redundant. -Kadin2048 22:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Changes 

message: From "Only the United States Navy and the Royal Navy field an all-nuclear submarine force" to "Only the United States Navy, the France Marine Nationale and the Royal Navy field an all-nuclear submarine force." France has four SSBN one "Redoutable", three "Triomphant" and six SSN "Rubis"class. See Force_Océanique_Stratégique. 83.197.94.122 22:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little change
Talk:Feral Tribune

message: This article is a trainwreck.
Why?
The two largest sections of it have barely any citations.
Also, I get the vibe of a romanticized portrayal of the magazine.
Is this really something you would find in an encyclopedia?
How is Wikipedia supposed to be taken seriously with articles like this?
Please, clean this rubbish dump up. Timbouctou or whoever.
This is coming from someone who read the weekly magazine for years.
Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.207.82.196 (talk) 12:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trainwreck 
Talk:Canadian Heritage Alliance

message: It's worth asking the question. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a reliable source for what was removed? 

message: Guy has suggested merging our article about Melissa Guille into this one. Here's a place to discuss whether to make this merger.
*Support merge because Melissa Guille has no WP:NOTABILITY outside the CHA. CWC 13:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging [[Melissa Guille]] here
Talk:Android 16

message: This comment posted by someone named Olee Bass on 02:19, 9 August 2005:
I think it should be noted that Android #16 is the real reason that Gohan managed to unleash his full power.
A very under-rated character.''
He posted it on the main article, and while I agree, the comment belongs on the discussion page.
If you can see this, Olee Bass, then next time change the article to say that, instead of posting a comment at the end.
Super Saiyan Plough 01:50, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

message: This has been moved from List of Dragon Ball characters. If needed, they should be put in this article instead.
Attacks:
*Hell's Flash
*Rocket Punch
*Self Destrution Device
-- ReyBrujo 03:02, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Attacks

message: Anyone remember why #16 abandoned his mission of fighting Goku and fought against Cell instead? Was it something about finding beauty in nature? It should be noted here. As it is, the article defines him as having the "sole purpose" of fighting Goku but then immediately discusses his attacks against Cell. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 17:20, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of "Heart?" 

message: I just reverted a change by Jordanhorn that took out the lines saying 17 and 18 are really his siblings. It's debatable (Dr Gero as father vs. creator), but given that it's an opinion and not an outright error, it should be discussed before just changing it. Regardless, I reverted because it broke the formatting more than anything. Please preview your edit before you save it, especially on something formatted like a table. Peter 16:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Siblings

message: When Android 16 releases in 2025, this page would be a disambiguation page as it would likely to relate as a OS. Just a random Wikipedian(talk) 11:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Android 16 will usurp this redirect as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and we would have a hatnote pointing to the non-notable character that doesn't have a standalone article. This is what happened with Android 13 and Android 14, and what will happen with Android 15 and beyond. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2025 Android 16
Talk:Heath

message: I've added a reference leading to Etymonline. Would this be sufficient? If it isnt, I'd like your assistance please. Thanks! — ᚹᚩᛞᛖᚾᚻᛖᛚᛗ (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Wōdenhelm – well, it would, but the ref doesn't really support the derivation – it just says "could be..", which is hardly definitive.  Can we find any better refs?  Richard New Forest (talk) 21:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked the OED.  It discusses the heathen-from-heath theory, but essentially it dismisses it, on "etymological and chronological grounds" (for example, it appears that the word-endings in the various languages are wrong for that derivation).  The OED favours the Germanic heathen words being derived from an Armenian word derived ultimately from Greek ethnos, meaning "nation", "heathen".  Richard New Forest (talk) 22:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Perhaps I could reword it accordingly, so that it'll be listed as a strong possibility, rather than a definite. — ᚹᚩᛞᛖᚾᚻᛖᛚᛗ (talk) 06:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Sounds reasonable - I too would keep heathen out of this article. Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Heath/Heathen

message: This article seems too short to be B class.  I am sure it could be more comprehensive.  It only has 8 citations.  Until these criteria are tended to C class is more appropriate. - Shiftchange (talk) 13:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Mt Anne from High Shelf Camp.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 19, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-10-19. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 16:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Mt Anne from High Shelf Camp.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: i have removed the statement that the honey possum is the world's "only nectar feeding mammal."  Just for a start, many bats eat nectar as well.Wikigreenwood (talk) 05:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: nectar feeding mammal
Talk:J. J. Earle

message: I seriously doubt that this is one of the worst translations ever. There's lots of amateur translations published by people who barely know the language (or sometimes don't know the language at all) out there. --Prosfilaes 01:56, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article J. J. Earle obviously is about John Earle (professor) or rather one single aspect of him, nameley the quality of his Beowulf translation: This might become a section in the target article or could be grossly condensed: I cannot access the objectivity and encyclopedic relevance of the statement Worst. Translation. Ever.
So far I have not been able to establish "J. J." or "John J." als forms of name for the person. Library catalogues and the title page of the 1892 Clarendon Press edition of The Deeds of Beowulf know him plainly as "John Earle". -- Gymel (talk) 09:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Kilmacud Crokes GAA

message: Can  be removed now.--Fenian Swine 01:59, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: which would look best in the infobox? 
(Gnevin 13:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  champion or championships 

message: The Kilmacud Crokes jersey is simular to the Wexford jersey. It is purple with a yellow belly. The wear white shorts with a purple stripe up the side and they wear purple socks with a yellow line running along around the top. I would add this myself but I don't nno how.--Play Brian Moore 18:18, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crokes Jersey 

message: It seems that every time you on wiki, you notice more vandalism on the Kilmacud Crokes page and also the Mark Vaughan page, (if you go to the 2000's section you will notice that someone refers to him as a 'cunt'. It would be worth restricting ths Crokes and Vaughan pages to registeres editors only? Frainc 14:22 16 May 2006
: Argee   does anyone know about how to do this (Gnevin 22:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ps According to ripe[]
the address of the latest attack and a few others are ucd based (Gnevin 22:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added request for WP:RFPP (Gnevin 23:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Admin word says that their is not enough vandalism to justify protection we'll just have too rv what we see (Gnevin 01:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Not enough vandilism?. These pages are vandilised every single day. It is becoming a joke. They should be restricted to registered users.--Play Brian Moore 21:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism