Talk:Teething

message: is there any way a less frightening picture of a toothless infant's mouth could be used?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.221.152.45 (talk) 13:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: scary image?

message: The article mentions "special chemicals" that are released to allow for the teeth to break through, seems kind of ambiguous for an encyclopedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.191.41.156 (talk) 10:36, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: special chemicals?

message: I got here from Dog. At some point mention needs to be made of teething regarding animals. --Rob 01:32, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this is stub / in need of expansion? 

message: Is it considered teething when the later molars and then the wisdom teeth come in?...  Blackcats 07:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teenage and adult teething? 

message: This article has information exclusively about the emergence of milk, or deciduous teeth.  Conspicuous by its absence is any information about the emergence of permanent teeth.  There is not even a link.
Ironically, I was led to this article by a link from another article, referencing abnormal third dentition.  The more surprising to find nothing even about the normal process of deciduous tooth replacement, let alone unusual cases.
I have made some makeshift repairs in the form of wikilinks to relevant articles, such as Tooth eruption and Permanent teeth, but the subject in general is badly disorganized, and I am not qualified to address this.  Is there a dentist in the house? Freederick (talk) 01:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that this is more or less in line with the main meaning of the word "teething" in ordinary non-specialist use.  The growing in of permanent teeth is covered more at article Deciduous teeth... AnonMoos (talk) 07:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete 

message: Animals go through teething as well. I think it would be a good addition to the article if information on the process in animals was added. 90.200.150.240 (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In animals 

message: * https://scienceornot.net/2012/10/30/amber-necklaces-and-teething-babies/
* http://www.kwch.com/content/news/?article=412558473
• Sbmeirow • Talk • 05:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amber necklace pseudoscience 

message: The following two sentences contradict each other.
Teething may cause signs and symptoms in the mouth and gums, but does not cause problems elsewhere in the body.[8]
Pulling on the ears is another sign of pain; the pain in the mouth throbs throughout the baby's head so they pull their ears believing that it will provide relief
As well may be worth stating that anecdotal reports link nappy rash, colic and other symptoms to teething kersti (talk) 09:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Dr. Clay Jones, a practicing paediatrician, has recently raised concern over potential errors and inappropriate health advice in this article. Please, see this link for more information:
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/from-the-vault-infant-teething-myths-and-misconceptions/ AufbauPrinciple (talk) 12:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please could you raise this at WT:MED? Bon courage (talk) 13:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly! Sorry, I wasn't sure where to raise this potential issue. AufbauPrinciple (talk) 16:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is good, there is better. I'd do it myself but I didn't want to steal your thunder (so to speak)! Bon courage (talk) 16:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Clay Jones' critique