lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Guadalupe County, Texas

message: *2006 Subcounty population estimates for Texas - U.S. Census Bureau.
Guadalupe County,Texas,89023,89036,89891,92175,94329,96806,99543,103093,108410 
Cibolo city (pt.),Texas,3035,3086,3161,3422,3766,4720,5853,7823,10045 
Marion city,Texas,1099,1090,1096,1108,1116,1119,1118,1119,1130 
New Berlin city,Texas,467,467,470,478,483,486,488,488,496  
New Braunfels city (pt.),Texas,1166,2066,2101,2215,2407,2638,2923,3220,3643 
San Marcos city (pt.),Texas,X,0,0,0,0,4,8,13,18 
Santa Clara city,Texas,889,853,860,875,885,891,894,895,910  
Schertz city (pt.),Texas,17333,19164,19402,20097,20648,21237,22171,23315,24513 
Seguin city,Texas,22011,22824,22952,23205,23652,23983,24157,24250,24909 
Selma city (pt.),Texas,50,97,103,127,158,249,309,324,421 
Universal City city (pt.),Texas,X,0,0,0,0,0,0,2,4 
Balance of Guadalupe County,Texas,42973,39389,39746,40648,41214,41479,41622,41644,42321 
There were no San Marcos residents in Guadalupe County in 2000 and 18 in 2006. There were no Universal City residents in Guadalupe County in 2000 and 4 in 2006.--Acntx (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cities in multiple counties
Talk:Cara Cunningham/Archive 4

message: There is too much personal, unvalidated information on Crocker that has been written from an "in perspective"- clearly written by Crocker himself. Why is this still standing while other elements of the article are in such dispute? I smell bias... 71.223.7.42 (talk) 02:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing wrong with personal information as in goes in line with WP:BIO. Reginmund (talk) 03:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regimund, I can name so many instances where your argument was written off as an "unvalidated excuse" on Wikpedia that it simply doesn't stand- at least not without exposing a double standard. Besides, most of how the "in-universe" perspective seems to border on vanity page material on this particular page. I become just a little more convinced every time I'm on here that the only thing Wikipedia's good for in the first place is a quick laugh doing that nerd bias thing... 71.223.7.42 (talk) 03:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved this to the bottom where it goes. Please remember that new topics go at the bottom of the talk page, not at the top. Thanks. -- ALLSTARecho 03:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

text: If you have any particular items you think should be looked at pleas share them otherwise please observe talk page guidelines and take other issues elsewhere. Benjiboi 14:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much personal information 

message: I don't know how to fix it, but can someone figure out how to get rid of the ghastly error messages that this page is riddled with? They've been this way since November, how has someone missed it? I (talk) 22:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be much more specific, I see no error messages, ghastly or otherwise. Benjiboi 22:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It must just be my computer then, because there is no way anyone would let it look like it does to me for any length of time, protected or not. I have big red Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer, use a descriptive title tags</big> everywhere. I (talk) 22:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it might be on your end as I have nothing like that but I'm not sure what would cause it. It sounds like something is reading the reference numbers as the tag names. You might want to look at other referenced articles to see if they appear in the same manner. Benjiboi 22:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Is it on every reference? and is it on other articles? Benjiboi 23:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And now it's fixed. That's really weird. I (talk) 00:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing it's a new coding of the mark-up we use to label a reference and the error pops up when a number is in the arbitrary name we give a reference so, to me, the easy fix is to rename any that are doing that. Unless the coding is fixed or otherwise addressed we can deal with it once the content dispute is resolved. Benjiboi 00:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ack
Template talk:Politics of Malaysia

message: I understand that there's a proposal to restructure the infobox. Let's have a look at what's being proposed and why. - Bob K | Talk 03:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a bad idea. I like the structure you proposed. Let's leave it up for a while to see if there are any further opinions. If not, then I'd suggest that you go ahead with the proposed changes. Nonetheless, I'd like to suggest that the current hidden table structure be retained as some of the articles that would fall under this larger category are quite short and to have a long infobox at the side would not really add to the aesthetics of the article. - - Bob K | Talk 00:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Amended the model a little -- forgot about the state constitutions and rulers/governors.  And yeah, I agree on maintaining the hide/show style. -- Myinuk (talk) 00:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed restructuring 

message: As far as I know, there isn't such a title in Malaysia. The Prime Minister is usually an elected Member of Parliament who is the leader of the largest political party in Parliament. Currently this position is already filled. The decision on who becomes the Prime Minister has to be confirmed by His Majesty the Yang Dipertuan Agong and the majority of the House. So far there has been no indication that this has occurred for any designated successor. The only process that has been done so far is a unilateral decision by one political party. I am therefore removing the title until we can achieve a consensus on this. - Bob K | Talk 02:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Prime Minister Designate?
Talk:Lenin (1916 icebreaker)

message: Myers says:
:Saint Alexander Nevsky (renamed Lenin) 3,375 gross tonnage. Yard number A/W 905. Completed June 1917. This is also confirmed by an eye-witness in G. Fischer’s memoirs V Rossii i v Anglii, Moscow, 1922, pp 94-5. The vessel was commandeered by the Royal Navy, renamed H.M.S. Alexander, and sent to assist the allied intervention against the Bolsheviks. On 10 July 1918, by a supreme irony, H.M.S. Alexander came face to face with the heavily-armed Sviatogor on the Northern Dvina at Archangel, though conflict was avoided on this occasion. On the departure of the allied forces in 1919, Alexander was handed over to the White Russian forces.
So did she go Newcastle (June 1917) -> Tsarist "Saint Alexander Nevsky" -> Royal Navy (HMS Alexander) -> White Russian (1919) -> Soviet Navy "Lenin"?
Was it Sovietized in 1917?
How and when did the Royal Navy captured her?
When did she was captured by the Soviets from the White Russians? 
--84.20.17.84 (talk) 12:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My interpretation of Myers is that the ship was completed in June 1917 in a British shipyard, and the British government immediately took control of her instead of allowing her to be delivered to the Russian Empire or the Bolsheviks. (No military force was used.) The details of this decision would be fascinating to know. The article doesn't mention any of this. --Jtir (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did she became Lenin? 

message: Lenin (icebreaker) would be consistent with Krasin (icebreaker) and Lenin (nuclear icebreaker). Lenin (icebreaker) is currently a redirect to here. --Jtir (talk) 17:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Renamed and relinked. These names may not conform to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships). --Jtir (talk) 17:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  propose renaming to [[Lenin (icebreaker)]] 

message: Move following consensus after this  talk as per WP:NCS. --Robertiki (talk) 09:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 June 2016 move
Talk:Sirius/to do

message: Coming to this page to check some facts about Sirius A for a book I am writing about Manchester physics, I was disappointed to find that one of the things I already knew as an irrefutable fact was incorrectly reported here.  This undermines the credibility of the whole article and since I assume it has been written by astronomers and I am a mere particle physicist, I can't trust the article for anything.  I am therefore surprised that it has received accolades for being such a good one.
The irrefutable fact is that the first measurement of the diameter was published in 1956 and not 1959 as stated in the text, nor 1958 as given in the (wrong) citation.   The original paper was:
R Hanbury Brown and R Q Twiss. Nature. Volume 178. November 1956. pp1046-1048.
The value they measured was 6.8 +/– 0.5 mas.
In addition, this original paper is cited in the subsection headed "Discovery of a companion" and not in the section "Sirius A" where a "current" uncited value of 5.936±0.016 mas is quoted.  I have found a recent Australian compilation giving the diameter as 6.041±0.017 mas which differs from the value quoted here by six standard deviations of the quoted errors, which is most disturbing.
I haven't edited then page because it might be someone's pet baby.  But I do urge a thorough  vetting and overhaul of the whole article which I feel has gained an undeserved reputation for quality.
TheProfRobin (talk) 23:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First measurement of the size of Sirius A
Talk:Politics of the Cook Islands

message: This article is lacking any mention of the House of Ariki . If no one else edits it, I'll see what I can do when I get round to it. Aridd (talk) 13:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi this is not "Le Koutu Nui" but "Koutu Nui" Nevers (talk) 20:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glutaminolysis

message: Reaction steps from glutamine to α-ketoglutarate part 1. Hydrolysis of the amine to give glutamate and ammonium.  Should this read hydrolysis of amide to give.....?  Seems correct from chemical point of view, but I'm not a biochemist.....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.0.96.1 (talk) 13:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reaction pathway
Portal talk:Current events/September 2005

message: 09-Jan-2008: The edit-buttons might not work at each day (some highly complex, peculiar article formats have been garbled). However, each day in September 2005 really is an article of the form:
:* Portal:Current events/2005_September_1
Refer to each day, using those article names. I didn't create this design, just trying to help others work with it. -Wikid77 (talk) 18:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How to edit days

message: 09-Jan-2008: The format of this article had been a tall column wrapped as 8 words-per-line, but was changed 09Jan08 to wrap as 16 words-per-line (at 800x600 resolution screen size), reducing page length by 40% (making the page seem half as long). The coding is:

  ==[[Portal:Current events]]==
  {| align=right style="background-color:transparent"
       cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0
  | style="width:250px"|
  {{Portal:Current events/September 2005/Calendar}}
  {{Portal:Current events/September 2005/Sidebar}}
  |}
  {{Portal:Current events/Month Inclusion|2005 September}}
  {{Portal:Current events/Events by month}}

This month September_2005 was the first widened to shorten the page. The page can be narrowed for each user by changing the width of their browser windows. -Wikid77 (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Portal talk:Current events/August 2005

message: 09-Jan-2008: The format of this article had been a tall column wrapped as 8 words-per-line, but was changed 09Jan08 to wrap as 16 words-per-line (at 800x600 resolution screen size), reducing page length by 40% (making page seem half as long). The coding to shorten page:

  ==[[Portal:Current events]]==
  {| align=right style="background-color:transparent"
       cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0
  | style="width:250px"|
  {{Portal:Current events/August 2005/Calendar}}
  {{Portal:Current events/August 2005/Sidebar}}
  |}
  {{Portal:Current events/Month Inclusion|2005 August}}
  {{Portal:Current events/Events by month}}

This month August_2005 was the 2nd widened to shorten the page. The page can be narrowed for each user by changing the width of their browser windows. -Wikid77 (talk) 13:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Talk:Lone Star Music

message: I've deleted the "Bob Wills [statue] vandalization" section due to its irrelevance, but I've saved it here, just in case someone wants it for something.
"Bob Wills vandalization [sic]
"On May 20, 2006, the 8-foot statue of Texas musician Bob Wills was discovered to have been pulled over during the night. The statue's arm was broken off, lying on the ground next to it. Spurred by the upcoming Bob Wills Day, the vandalism made headlines on hundreds of news organizations around the world. The story was covered on CNN, Yahoo, and CBS.com."
Acwilson9 (talk) 02:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleted "Bob Wills [statue] vandalization" section, due to its irrelevance
Talk:Brockholes railway station

message: I have rated this at Stub class, using criteria from WP:ASSESS
* a particularly useful picture or graphic = yes.
* multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic = yes
* a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic = no - History section needed, article mentions line has been singled (when? who by?).
* multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article = no, see above Mjroots (talk) 13:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Micropygidae

message: There's no introduction.  What is this thing? -- Whpq (talk) 14:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro missing

message: eg GBIF puts Micropygidae under the order Micropygoida. Validity?--Estopedist1 (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  order Micropygoida?
Talk:Father figure

message: — Assignment last updated by Littlebearshehe (talk) 03:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi all, I changed the section name "cultural factors" to "pop culture examples" because I thought that it better represents the section. I'm also wondering whether that section is necessary since it is one of the longest sections - we could shorten it! I also changed the section name "lack" to "absence" because it sounded smoother, but please let me know if you think "lack" is a better representation of the section! I also added 2 paragraphs under that section using information that I found from a literature review, feel free to let me know if there's anything you would like to change! I also added a section "In Psychoanalytic Theory", again, feel free to let me know if there's anything you would like to change! Lastly, I added an image, let me know what you guys think! Littlebearshehe (talk) 00:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGW3307 Adv Writing for the Sciences
Talk:List of ports in China

message: I'm still looking around Wikipedia for this, but if someone already knows, please add a link or a small history section about the approved ports during the closed period (Xiamen, Guangdong, Macao) and their opening up under the Treaty Port system (HK, SH, TJ, etc.). — LlywelynII 02:11, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-01-09 Israeli-Palestinian conflict

message: Use this page for comments. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: By the way, I don't actually feel that the article Israeli-Palestinian conflict is really the main issue at stake right now. However, it has the additional unique benefit of having a title which actually describes neatly what the focus is of the entire RFaR case which is currently getting underway. So by initating a MedCab case starting here, and drawing in some additional outside help, this seems like a useful place with which to start some additional positive efforts, to address the current range of disputes which will probably have to be addressed over time by ArbCiom, in the current case there. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 23:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, i just found the following statement at the MedCab page. So it looks like my idea turns out to have been right in line with established procedure all along. that seems interesting. thanks. 
Special case: If the mediation concerns more than one article, put it first on the talk page that has the most general name and then copy the template to the other articles. If there is no article with a name that relates to the issue, you can change the name, but be sure to use a neutral name that all parties can agree with.
--Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 23:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: mediation scope

message: To answer 6SJ7 : the purpose of this "forum" would be to set-up an unique room of discussions where all issues could be discussed. Ceedjee (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose
Talk:Ilkeston Grammar School

message: The note in the references section is correct in that the Head teachers' section misses out Mr John Elwell, who was Headmaster from 1978 until the mid 1980's. Would someone know the actual dates? Ilsonbloke (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Template talk:American Open Wheel driver results legend

message: why is the place of finish not shown for DNFs?  In pretty much every modern American open wheel racing points system, points can be awarded for DNFs.  Its not like the F1 "not classified"
--RA64 (talk) 19:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree fully, especially in some early 90's races, where drivers would be scored in 9th, but not finish. Asher413 (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We generally DO show the place of finish for DNF's. If you find some instances of the template where it is not shown, go ahead and replace it. DNS: Too Slow should generally be shown as a DNQ (bright red) rather than a simple DNS (white). -Drdisque (talk) 14:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I haven't spotted a key to the abbreviations of race names. There should be one and this page is where I'd expect to find it. Mdmi (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race-name abbreviations
Portal talk:Current events/October 2005

message: 09-Jan-2008: The edit-buttons don't work at each day (the highly complex, peculiar article format has been garbled). However, each day really is a WP article of the form:
:* Portal:Current events/2005_October_1
Refer to each day, using those article names. I didn't create this design, just trying to help others work around it. -Wikid77 (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How to edit days

message: 09-Jan-2008: The format of this article had been a tall column wrapped as 8 words-per-line, but was changed 09Jan08 to wrap as 16 words-per-line (at 800x600 resolution screen size), reducing page length by 40% (making page seem half as long). The coding to shorten page:

  ==[[Portal:Current events]]==
  {| align=right style="background-color:transparent"
       cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0
  | style="width:250px"|
  {{Portal:Current events/October 2005/Calendar}}
  {{Portal:Current events/October 2005/Sidebar}}
  |}
  {{Portal:Current events/Month Inclusion|2005 October}}
  {{Portal:Current events/Events by month}}

The month September_2005 was the 1st widened to shorten the page. The page can be narrowed for each user by changing the width of their browser windows. -Wikid77 (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Portal talk:Current events/November 2005

message: 09-Jan-2008: The edit-buttons might not work at each day (the highly complex, peculiar article format has been garbled). However, each day really is a WP article of the form:
:* Portal:Current events/2005_November_1
Refer to each day, using those article names. I didn't create this design, just trying to help others work around it. -Wikid77 (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How to edit days

message: 09-Jan-2008: The format of this article had been a tall column wrapped as 8 words-per-line, but was changed 09Jan08 to wrap as 16 words-per-line (at 800x600 resolution screen size), reducing page length by 40% (making page seem half as long). The coding to shorten page:

  ==[[Portal:Current events]]==
  {| align=right style="background-color:transparent"
       cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0
  | style="width:250px"|
  {{Portal:Current events/November 2005/Calendar}}
  {{Portal:Current events/November 2005/Sidebar}}
  |}
  {{Portal:Current events/Month Inclusion|2005 November}}
  {{Portal:Current events/Events by month}}

The month September_2005 was the 1st widened to shorten the page. The page can be narrowed for each user by changing the width of their browser windows. -Wikid77 (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Talk:Orca Engineering

message: Per discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles, the term 'supercar' is not sufficiently well-defined to be useful in an encyclopedia.  Furthermore, this article appears to be about the company 'Orca Engineering'.  Hence I am moving this page to 'Orca Engineering' and recommending the removal of the resulting redirect 'Orca (supercar)' on the grounds that it's POV. SteveBaker (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: (Untitled)
Talk:The Unvarnished New Testament

message: First of all, I'd like to encourage the article creator not to remove these warnings until a 3rd party (or the one who tagged the article) is sufficiently satisfied. I believe one sentence added to the intro could help the context. Per our style guidelines, the first sentence needs to almost be a straight forward dictionary definition of the subject. We need to tell the readers right off the bat what the topic is. We also need to establish notability per WP:BK. Has the book won awards? Has it been reviewed by notable, independent sources, etc. And speaking of sources, adding footnotes would help (and we need to cite sources that are independent of the subject). All of these things are still outstanding issues in the article. Hope this helps explain some of the major issues. -Andrew c [talk] 15:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for tagging and running.  The article's since been wikified and now has a context so I dropped those tags.  The remaining notability and sourcing issues (as well as Original Reserach) issues remain.  Specifically:
Phrases like 
*"attempt to produce a translation of the New Testament that was simpler and more straightforward (1991) than most English translations.", 
*"That book had generated interest in come circles, so he went on to translate the rest of the New Testament.
*"In addition to simpler sentence structure, he also chose to translate a number of words that are important in Christian theology with words that do are more commonplace and familiar "
need independent citations, such as book reviews, scholarly papers, or interviews at the least.
If the forward of the book is being used as a source, that needs to be noted with one of the Wikipedia:CITE templates, and giving the ISBN of the books published, would also improve its notability. MBisanz talk 17:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article issues