lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rafael Robb

message: For future reference - Rafael Robb is notable as an academic. He is (was) an Ivy League professor and a fellow of the Econometric Society and as such notable. Novidmarana (talk) 00:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Robb may have been notable in a circle of academics, but he is most notable to the general public as an Ivy League professor who pleaded guilty in the very high-profile death of his wife. That's why I changed the the article. He didn't have an article on Wikipedia before that happened. I appreciate his efforts as an academic, but that is not why there is an article on him on Wikipedia. Far more well-known professors in other fields don't have articles--lyonspen | (talk) 03:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wikipedia is not the yellow press. If it would be only for the murder of his wife he would not be notable at all, given that there a thousands of murders every day. What he is notable for are his contributions to evolutionary game theory. The fact that he has been elected as a fellow of the econometric society, that he was a professor at a top ten economics department and all that should give it away that he was not just a random academic. The fact that the press, let alone the yellow press do not report much about academia and economic science should not be a reason for Wikipedia to do the same.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Econmathguy (talk • contribs) 00:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see. Why was there no article on him before his arrest?lyonspen | (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not true. The popular press reported about him and his research even before this incident. Econmathguy (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  And btw where does WP:N says that we should move up a murder conviction? And even if WP:N would say that, wouldnt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) be more appropriate? Econmathguy (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notablity 

message: The page about him at RePEc:  introduces him as Rafael Robb. But, except for TWO, in ALL of his papers listed there (more than 50, I would say, I didn't count them) his family name is Rob. This fact is not mentioned at all in the page (to which I am going to add at least his famous coauthored work, more than 1500 citations according to Google Scholar). --Fioravante Patrone (talk) 07:32, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rob or Robb
Talk:XMission

message: Kudos to loeth for cleaning this page up.Pete Ashdown (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks loeth 

message: I think that it should be mentioned that author Maddox's highly popular site thebestpageintheuniverse.net is hosted by Xmission.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.147.78 (talk) 23:33, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maddox? 
Talk:Sunday Times Fast Track 100

message: I've noticed that this page uses "Sunday Times" in its title i.e. "Sunday Times Fast Track 100" in contrast with its sister publication e.g. "Tech Track 100".  I would suggest that they should all either include or exclude the "Sunday Times".  Any thoughts? Regards. KPOK  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.9.17 (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: Not sure this should be in the category Superlatives, its the name of the publication Rickb (talk) 09:54, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category Added - Superlatives 

message: This was already mentioned in a recent edit summary by 82.4.71.122, but I'll drop a note here too: there is a discussion related to this page at Talk:Translate plus#More Fast Track notes. Thank you. – PartTimeGnome (talk | contribs) 22:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at Talk:Translate plus
Talk:List of Argentine films of 2000

message: Unfortunately, there has been a strong tendency in the Argentine films of year X to include a very large number of red links. I would like to point out that blue links on five films per year would be much more helpful than a list of 100 red links. Please don't link to a large number films without articles or any information. For some reason, many films have also been included under many different years.JdeJ (talk) 09:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links
Talk:List of Argentine films of 2001

message: Unfortunately, there has been a strong tendency in the Argentine films of year X to include a very large number of red links. I would like to point out that blue links on five films per year would be much more helpful than a list of 100 red links. Please don't link to a large number films without articles or any information. For some reason, many films have also been included under many different years. JdeJ (talk) 09:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links
Talk:List of Argentine films of 2002

message: Unfortunately, there has been a strong tendency in the Argentine films of year X to include a very large number of red links. I would like to point out that blue links on five films per year would be much more helpful than a list of 100 red links. Please don't link to film without articles or any information. For some reason, many films have also been included under many different years.JdeJ (talk) 09:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links
Talk:List of Argentine films of 2003

message: Unfortunately, there has been a strong tendency in the Argentine films of X to include a very large number of red links. I would like to point out that blue links on five films per year would be much more helpful than a list of 100 red links. Please don't link to film without articles or any information. For some reason, many films have also been included under many different years.JdeJ (talk) 19:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links
Talk:List of Argentine films of 2004

message: Unfortunately, there has been a strong tendency in the Argentine films of X to include a very large number of red links. I would like to point out that blue links on five films per year would be much more helpful than a list of 100 red links. Please don't link to film without articles or any information. For some reason, many films have also been included under many different years.JdeJ (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links
Talk:List of Argentine films of 2005

message: Unfortunately, there has been a strong tendency in the Argentine films of X to include a very large number of red links. I would like to point out that blue links on five films per year would be much more helpful than a list of 100 red links. Please don't link to film without articles or any information.JdeJ (talk) 19:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links
Talk:1965–66 Alpha Ethniki

message: There is a problem with the scores in this year, as PAOK and Panionios official totals (W-D-L) and goals against/for do not correspond to the scores provided by the rsssf. If someone could help it would be great. - Sthenel (talk) 19:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Results
Talk:Coverity

message: This is personal experience, so I'm not prepared to change the original article, but I don't think ccplint should be mentioned as a competitor to Coverity. We've just performed a two day evaluation with Coverity, and ccplint has an entirely different function and purpose.
Also, it's refershing to know Google advocates One True Brace!
--Woolhiser (talk) 20:01, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cpplint

message: Links [3] and [4] are broken  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.87.228 (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Should be cited => LibreOffice Makes Strides in Software Quality with Coverity Scan --Kizar (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  LibreOffice 
Talk:Cinderella complex

message: I think (based on experience with my former wife who has a stepfather) that this is not a complex, this is real disability, because she was not taught by her father how to manage things, how to work at kitchen (or was prevented from being taught). She is not prepared for role in family. The main concern of her stepfather was how to get rid of her, not how to make her skilful human.
This is why she is not able to get a partner.
Moreover a child learns behavior from his parents. She had learned from a man who was substituting her father how to fight with her for resources. This experience has become her way to live.
When she grows older it becomes obvious that this learnt behavior is devastating.
If to say literally this is "complex complex" i.e. a host of stubborn problems
Vselezn (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation 

message: Why this article is not NPOV? It's pretty obvious but some dude demanded that I should justify my tag:
Careful examination of this work reveals many flawed or vague concepts. Where is the proof?
Janno (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to original research, since that's the first problem. It may well represent the consensus view, but no sources are cited and it seems like little more than someone's opinions. --Flex (talk/contribs) 02:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Is this article about false accusations of abuse, or about women wanting to be taken care of?  One or the other should be moved to its own page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Efalk (talk • contribs) 23:47, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Cinderella syndrome is sometimes used to describe false accusations of abuse, sometimes to describe higher paye being offered to better dressed women: both usages seem different from the complex the page is now about, both should perhaps have their own page.....Jacobisq (talk) 10:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topic confusion
Talk:Granddad's Fight

message: I don't think this article should be deleted at all. Thebluesharpdude--76.166.213.21 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why delete 

message: The first paragraph of the Plot section details the events of a scene which is just illustration while Huey's narration (which is the important part of the first scene) is only mentioned. I think it should be vica versa. Something like this:
"Huey describes "nigga moments" as when two African American people... blah-blah-blah. The narration is illustrated by two scenes depicting the aforementioned... blah-blah-blah... voiced by XY etc."
(Sorry that I won't write it, but my English is not that good.) 81.182.236.42 (talk) 01:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot?
Talk:Kaginawa

message: *1 http://books.google.com/books?id=ZzIXkFec0e8C&pg=PA113&dq=kaginawa&hl=en&ei=Sz0tTaa2MYKs8AaWvIz5CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=kaginawa&f=false
*2 http://books.google.com/books?id=6NoDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA44&dq=kaginawa&hl=en&ei=Sz0tTaa2MYKs8AaWvIz5CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDQQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=kaginawa&f=true
*3 http://books.google.com/books?id=BlT-x4vqaC4C&pg=PA45&dq=kaginawa&hl=en&ei=Sz0tTaa2MYKs8AaWvIz5CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CDgQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
*4 http://books.google.com/books?id=Fdxk3Mbe0ckC&pg=PA71&dq=kaginawa&hl=en&ei=Sz0tTaa2MYKs8AaWvIz5CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CEIQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=kaginawa&f=false
*5 http://books.google.com/books?id=qxL3CJkBZKQC&pg=PT11&dq=kaginawa&hl=en&ei=Sz0tTaa2MYKs8AaWvIz5CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CEwQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=kaginawa&f=false
*6 http://books.google.com/books?id=GsSMsu21CQkC&pg=PA74&dq=kaginawa&hl=en&ei=qkEtTZmpO8Kt8Aa89cHXCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CEcQ6AEwCDgK#v=onepage&q=kaginawa&f=false
*7 http://books.google.com/books?id=ZFf9e0DmHZUC&pg=PA223&dq=kaginawa&hl=en&ei=TkItTaLRLM6s8Ab81fzsCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCIQ6AEwADgU#v=onepage&q&f=false
Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 05:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References for editors to read
Talk:Liberty Christian Academy

message: There seems to be more than one account attempting to blank sourced material in this article. Given the IP (from Liberty U) blanking and the recent frantic thread at Wikipedia:Administrators%27 noticeboard#INNACURATE AND HURTFUL/FALSE INFORMATION, it seems somebody at Liberty has decided to sock or meatpuppet in order to blank the material again (1, 2). I'd like to think that those at an influential religious school would not act irresponsibly, but here we are. BusterD (talk) 12:18, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socking on this page
Talk:New York Central College

message: Some of the text discusses Native Americans at the school but most of the article focuses on African Americans. Did most schools accept and have Native American students? I also wonder how many female.students there were. Were there female dorms? FloridaArmy (talk) 11:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Women were in a separate dormitory supervised by a matron. I've added statistic. Regarding Native Americans, the only two I've run across reference to were in the primaru division (not college level). How other colleges treated Native Americans I don't know. deisenbe (talk) 09:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Native Americans

message: Hello - Could someone please remove the hyphen between New and York in the tile of this article- I do not know how to do this- The hyphen is also between New and York in the Categories section at the bottom of the page- This hyphen should also be removed- And it also should be removed on the pages to which the link leads - 
Category: New-York Central College
This category has the following 2 subcategories, out of 2 total.
New-York Central College alumni‎ (8 P)
New-York Central College faculty‎ (5 P)
I think the hyphen slipped in as it was in the text of a newspaper article from the mid 19th century - It was incorrect then and it is incorrect now
Look at the caption under both images that are on the New-York Central College page - The captions have the correct name
Thank you for this - This article is of local interest to me
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.249.88.229 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New-York Central College article
Talk:Pillsbury Baptist Bible College

message: This article feels as though it is becoming a bit jumbled in terms of whether it is about the defunct school/college or the various institutions which have used the campus (including the former college and now a summer camp and technical school). Any thoughts on how best to separate things out?
Nsteffel (talk) 22:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I could see a separate article on Pillsbury Academy and its iterations, which would include the discussion of NRHP resources.  Both articles would probably mention the current uses in passing.  As of right now, though, there's not all that much content so it's probably best collocated here. -McGhiever (talk) 16:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Focus
Talk:Slant Six Games

message: Does Slant Six even develop dark mirror? Orracle107 (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not aware of it. Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dark Mirror

message: people are constantly vandalising the article stating that they ruined SOCOM
confrontation is a great game once they fixed the bugs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.250.162.229 (talk) 14:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't a discussion forum for the quality (or apparent lack thereof) of Slant Six's video games, please keep information unbiased and relevant : eg, if the game really is very bad, mention that it got bad reviews and then cite the review(s). Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  excessive vandalism 

message: Slant 6 Advertise a clan ladders and tournament features but they have never existed in this game! 9 months since the release of this game! Also less than one third of the number of maps than other Socom titles. Sony and Slant6 should be ashamed of this unfinished and generally buggy/laggy CRAPPY sorry excuse for a online only game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.164.145 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't a discussion forum for the quality (or apparent lack thereof) of Slant Six's video games, please keep information unbiased and relevant : eg, if the game really is very bad, mention that it got bad reviews and then cite the review(s). Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk) 13:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing features! 

message: Hello, all. I do copy editing for the Star Wars Battlefront III video game and this piece of information implies that SSG might be working on the game. http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/04/03/star-wars-battlefront-3-files-discovered-on-resident-evil-raccoon-city-disc/ I have added it in the actual article. Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk) 13:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the article for SWBF3 : Star Wars: Battlefront III. Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars Battlefront III rumour. 

message: I feel like it was a good idea to add them but I feel like they can be made neater by someone else.  I'd like a bit of input as to whether or not the PC and console versions should be separate of they have a different score and whether or not linking directly to Metacritic is a good idea.  This is somewhat unimportant but it would help make the page a bit cleaner. Jub Jub Junoh (talk) 11:20, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Metacritic Scores
Talk:Zwaanendael Colony

message: First it says (emphasis mine):
:The existence of the little colony was short, for the Indians came down upon it in revenge for an arbitrary act on the part of Hosset, and it was destroyed, with no Dutch escaping to tell the tale. 
but later it says:
:de Vries sailed to Virginia, where was successful in obtaining provisions for the colonists in Zwaanendael, to which he returned.[5] He subsequently took the colonists to New Amsterdam.
How could he relocate them if they were all dead? 
Another strange thing is this statement:
:The details of the attack were recounted to Dutch observers by Nanticoke Indians
Observers of what?  Not the attack, obviously.  Clearly, if everyone was killed, the details would had to be gathered later by Dutch investigating the colony's disappearance.
Can anyone clarify this muddle?TheCormac (talk) 15:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Contradicts Itself

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Delaware Bay Vinckeboons 14.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 29, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-04-29. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 18:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Delaware Bay Vinckeboons 14.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:Haddo House

message: It may be protected by the National Trust for Scotland, but it really needs more referencing to support its notability.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 20:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Anybody inserting a word on a presumptive Raphael Madonna in the art collection? --Terminally uncool (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Since 2016 further research has determined that it's probably not a Raphael.  See https://www.thenational.scot/news/17837532.haddo-house-madonna-probably-not-italian-master-raphael/.  I'm therefore removing it from the article. --Antiquary (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raphael
Talk:African Development Trophy

message: Hello - glad someone set this up, as otherwise I would have.  I want to add this page reference to the international rugby template, but am uneasy with the name, as it is a sponsor's name.  It is also known as the CAR Super 16, so what I might do is call it this on the template, and then link it to this page under the CAR Castel Beer Trophy name. Stevebritgimp (talk) 20:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Alderson Broaddus University

message: I can't find evidence of notability. Adam9007 (talk) 22:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed, given that the incoming page has already been deleted. Klbrain (talk) 16:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Alderson Broaddus University Spirit Squads]] 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Alderson Broaddus University Spirit Squads is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alderson Broaddus University Spirit Squads until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Alderson Broaddus University Spirit Squads]] for deletion 

message: " given annually to an African-American students.." Is it an (singular) of students (plural)?  Also, there is an extra period at the end of the sentence. Kdammers (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-edit/fact-check needed
Talk:Chief Baron of the Exchequer

message: I have a record in a family tree of a Sir Richard Richards who once held this post - has he been missed from this list? 81.156.172.78 (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (Belated reply) He's there now, if he wasn't earlier, for 1817 onwards. BencherliteTalk 23:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

message: I didn't understand anything here. What country, what time the article is talking about? That should be cleared up, because wikipedia articles should be understandable without any prior context. Also that citation in the first paragraph is in wrong tone, looks too strange, I think it should be changed to a modern english sentence with the citation being the reference.--Tiredtime (talk) 18:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have clarified that this relates to the English judicial system.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: When? Where?

message: The above redirects here.  CAn we not get up an article listing the puisne barons? Or have I missed it?  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Barons of the Exchequer

message: The author is given as Peter Toone, but unless I have missed something, this is an error -  the first name is William, not Peter. The full-text is on Archive.org, and I will add links to this. The Chronological Historian is cited multiple times in the article, and I suggest using the reference page style of citation to simplify this.Kognos (talk) 23:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Chronological Historian
Talk:Constitution Party National Convention

message: Where's the TALK discussion to improve this article? -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 09:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article discussion 

message: Hi all, Ballot Access News published the results of the 2020 Constitution Party by state in their June edition here (you will have to scroll down to the section entitled "Constitution Party Nominates"). I don't know how to make a convention map of these results, but if someone else knows how to do so, that would be a very good addition to the article. Jacoby531 (talk) 20:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 convention results by state
Talk:European Parliament in Luxembourg

message: Thanks to RCS we have lots of new information on Strasbourg. However what we are missing now is infomation on Luxembourg. Anyone know where we can get it? - J Logan t: 19:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To do