lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lumbricidae

message: The suggested translations are not to this family, but to earthworms that are included in the family. If you go to Earthworms, you will see that there is already a suitable article. This is the article for the family name that earthworms are in, not earthworms themselves. I was ready to tackle the large task of translating at least one of those other articles, when I realized that they possibly redirected to a lower rank in the taxonomy. Now if we want to be consistent, then why not merge this article into the English earthworm article.2606:A000:870D:BC00:8D69:A130:8373:D314 (talk) 19:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations 

message: Please add information about what they are doing to North American forests. Introduced earthworms, deliberately spread by anglers, are devouring centuries worth of duff in our forests. This leaves roots exposed, harming trees and shrubs. It completely destroys the habitat of native insects, salamanders, and wildflowers. Readers in North America need to know that these are extremely destructive invaders. 2601:441:4400:1740:B95A:927B:B34A:726 (talk) 11:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affect on American Forests
Talk:Davenport desk

message: Yeah right, you think that I'm going to bother going out to take a photo after "contributors" (they call themselves "deletionists", hoping to make a virtue of their wanton destruction) have been going around deleting the drawings I painstakingly made for many of these desks, and PUTTING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in their place. They weren't great drawings, but they were better than nothing. When I made them a few years ago I was hoping that one day somebody would put up better drawings. --AlainV (talk) 04:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Lumbriculidae

message: I gave this article a "start" rating on the quality scale. That being said, this is effectively a list. I'll keep the article watchlisted but if no content is added within the next few months it will likely be moved to a "list" rating. Justin chat 04:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:ANIMALS|WikiProject Animals]] rating
Talk:Davenport (sofa)

message: since when in holy heck has texas been part of the midwest? 03:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: The word also has another meaning: "a small compact writing desk" (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/davenport).Kdammers (talk) 02:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  desk
Talk:Ishmel Demontagnac

message: I have looked into Ishmel's history and he never signed a professional contract at Charlton meaning they were only one of his youth clubs.  I also found out in a news article that he was once at Arsenal so I have also added those to that section along with Charlton and Walsall.
(WFCPenniall (talk) 18:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clubs

message: To the person who added the sentence, "He's well known for being the son of Lisa and Marlo Stansfield." could you please add sources to your edits in future.  Thanks.
(WFCPenniall (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: About Ishmel

message: Is his surname pronounced like it would be in French? Spiderone (talk) 15:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Lists of Michigan Wolverines football passing leaders

message: I feel that this list, as well as Lists of Michigan Wolverines football receiving leaders and Lists of Michigan Wolverines football rushing leaders could be merged into a master "Lists of Michigan Wolverines football statistical leaders." As they are, they are just three splits of limited notability (considering that most of the NFL teams don't have similar articles) and none of them are particularily large. If merged together, a page would be under 60 K, which is perfectly acceptable. One list would be more useful than three. -- Scorpion0422 23:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this would be a good merge. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what the new policy is on separate lists.  I personally would leave them separate, but don't know what the guidelines are now.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  01:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

text: After further thoughts, I agree with Cbl and JKBrooks and Oppose the merger.  I think the merged list is quite a large conglomerations of tables.  I have never seen so many tables in one article before.  I think these are preferable as separate lists.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  03:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A merge makes sense though, since most of the prose in the articles recreate eachother. The tables aren't particularily large, and I think having them together makes sense. If you are concerned about the length, they could be trimmed. A merged page also allows room for field goal statistics to be included. -- Scorpion0422 03:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Indeed, and the featured list criteria have changed recently. Take note of criterion 3b: "[the list] meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; it is not a content fork, does not largely recreate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article." On an unrelated note, is there any link from one of these articles to another? Dabomb87 (talk) 05:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I've got to go with the oppose here; as Cbl62 stated, there's so much information in each of these that it'd be difficult to merge well. If someone were to create a nice merged version on a talk page, however, I might be persuaded otherwise. Until then, I'm just not convinced. JKBrooks85 (talk) 09:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

text: That is most certainly within limits; I would strongly support a merge. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Nice work Scorpion!  I would now be confident that a merge would represent a net improvement.  I support the proposed merge. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  23:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

text: *Nice work! I'm starting to see how this could function. You get some prose for each section, and it could work pretty well. JKBrooks85 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Nurmahal

message: Few years ago post code for Nurmahal post office was 141309. It has changed around year 2000 to 144039.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkatwal (talk • contribs) 02:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  is not required for edits to  unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages. Besides which, the article already shows 144039, so there's nothing to do. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous post code for Nurmahal 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—223.185.13.145 (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article. I've tweaked the coordinates a bit; but if you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 16:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Down by the Glenside (The Bold Fenian Men)

message: In the version by the Holohan Sisters, the second and third verse are switched. Do we have a primary source indicating their correct order?  As well, The Dubliners performed a version with only 4 verses rather than the five. Worth adding?--Korinthos (talk) 22:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyric Order 

message: so a user-comment of IMDb is a reference for Wikipedia? olala! -- 185.17.204.43 (talk) 15:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Is AllMusic a bit better?  Scolaire (talk) 17:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Nereididae

message: I don't know much about these worms, but I think Ragworm should be merged here. --Glennfcowan (talk) 02:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, it is a distinct species and that article has its own taxobox and all and though stubby is essentially complete. It ought to be mentioned in the merged article though. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Nereis

message: "This last paragraph was added by David Agius, St. Aloysius' College Malta"
.. is this AT ALL necessary?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by XDecemberFlower (talk • contribs) 02:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In conflict with Nereididae: the taxonomy entry says nereididiae are errantia but nereis are palpata.
Pablowako (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy
Talk:Pectinariidae

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Pectinaria koreni (with and without tube).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 24, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-02-24. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 17:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Pectinaria koreni (with and without tube).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The link to Petta Malmgren, 1866 leads to a moth genus?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anders Sandberg (talk • contribs) 01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the polychaete genus Petta as an entry and fixed the redirection. --DawkinsLapdog (talk) 18:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Petta?
Talk:Spirorbis spirorbis

message: There must be another one out there.Wilson44691 (talk) 19:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link is dead 

message: The article says Spirorbis coils sinistrally, but the photo shows them coiling dextrally.  Has the photo been reversed or is the description incorrect?Wilson44691 (talk) 19:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Found a good replacement link.Wilson44691 (talk) 20:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coiling direction?
Talk:Swami Ramanand

message: The importance of the page is that Swami Ramanand was the guru of Bhagwan Swaminarayan.
:So all you need to do is add two or three reliable, independent sources that discuss this person and why he was important, to show that he meets the notability criteria. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no need to provide sources or otherwise meet notability criteria to avoid speedy deletion, only to indicate importance/significance, which has been done. WP:CSD#A7 states this explicitly. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; I'm the one who placed a {prod} tag, not the one who speedied it.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Industrial PC

message: I felt this article was redundant to Rugged_computer and poorly written in any case.  I left the underlying page material if anybody wishes to disagree and try to clean this up.  Grammer is bad.  Much unsubstantiated opinion.  The entire 'Popular Industrial PC Form Factors' section is just a summary of motherboard types and has nothing specific to do with industrial computing.  Certainly nothing more than listing all the types of optical drives.  The 'reference' is advertising.  Windows XP Embedded is not hard to install if you know what you are doing.
If somebody insists, I will attempt to rewrite this to be a bit more correct but I think that Industrial PCs fall into the category of Rugged Computers. --Chassisplans (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's move to Talk:Rugged computer (to keep all opinions at single space) Alex V Eustrop (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to [[Rugged_computer]]

message: Does anyone have a source for the assertion that an industrial PC is x86 based?  Remember a PC is not necessarily x86 based so we can't inherit any restriction from there. CrispMuncher (talk) 23:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  x86 based?
Talk:Lord Chamberlain's Office

message: I'm going to suggest that the quotation from Lord Chamberlain's office is far to long for an encyclopedia article. Could you summarize the main points?. Also, try using a quotation template as a means of preserving the formatting of the original letter. -Dhodges (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I like to say, the LCO may be important to Lady Chatterley's Lover, but Lady Chatterley's Lover is not important to LCO. I've moved it to Lady Chatterley's Lover--Tysto (talk) 19:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes
Talk:Sylvia's Mother

message: Should a section be added comparing this song with other's of it's ilk? (Thinking of songs from David Bowie, Dr. Demento etc. 
Maetrix (talk) 17:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Here and in all other videos it's not "Mr. Hook" = Ray Sawyer, but who is it? I don't find in the article, either. Altaripensis2 (talk) 14:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who sings?
Talk:Microsoft SharePoint Designer

message: Where's the logo for Microsoft Office SharePoint Designer? All the other desktop applications have their's on the article. So why doesn't this article haves it's one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ross Rhodes (talk • contribs) 21:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Microsoft SharePoint Designer will be available free of charge beginning April 1, 2009.
If not a joke it should be at least referenced before being put onto the page. Free versions (30 day evaluations) are currently available from MS websites. You can also use it on line but free downloads of a star program ?? Good if it materialises, johnmark†talk to me 11:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was wrong! but still suprised by MS making this available this way. article changed as suggested, johnmark†talk to me 14:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  April fools ? 

message: That is a category this Software really does not belong to. That category is about Free Software contrary to proprietary Software.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.239.245.143 (talk) 11:06, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Free Html Editors
Talk:Moby Dick (restaurant)

message: The article states: "The restaurants are known colloquially by Washington area residents as "Moby's"
As a 40-year resident of the Washington, D.C. area and the designer of the original logo for the Moby Dick House of Kabob restaurant when they opened in Bethesda in 1989, I can say that I have never heard of the restaurant chain being called "Moby's" -- for which I am grateful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CLSwiki (talk • contribs) 23:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colloquial name ? 

message: I went ahead and removed a non-notable incident. Currently their are 17 chain restaurants under this brand, and the simple fact that a non-lethal shooting took place at one establishment in the year 2000, 18 years ago, is non-notable to say the least. No reason it should take up 1/3 of the article's length. The incident does not even have it's own Wikipedia page! 75.142.111.231 (talk) 19:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Incident 

message: Apparently one user is concerned this is not a noteworthy incident. I disagree: there exists wp:RS for that event which contributes holistically to the history of the topic in question. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with { {re|BrxBrx}}) 15:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shooting
Talk:Shark!

message: In this issue from LIFE magazine the attack is blamed on a second shark which broke through a protective net, not the sedated bull shark:
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=3lQEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA86&lpg=PA86&dq=Mexican+stuntman,+Jose+Marco&source=bl&ots=NTi7r9KjcY&sig=xaj9JiUK3eZXs2mLRTmg0MWfN_0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jQfoU7jqH8Lr8AX9soHQDQ&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Mexican%20stuntman%2C%20Jose%20Marco&f=false
 Stefanmuc (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  One shark or two? 

message: Where is the support for calling this article Shark!?  The film itself and every contemporary poster I have seen is simply Shark. 2002:620D:3AF:0:40FF:5CA:EFC:B980 (talk) 23:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Punish Me with Kisses

message: User Greg Fasolino deleted the Manuel Pinazo reference, stating "No, the Spanish writer was referring to the album, not this specific song. If you want to include this, put it on the Blue Sunshine page)".  Here is the Google translation of the text from the article "A recommended tecnopop psychedelic artifact. A lysergic trip inspired several B movies in which the echoes of Syd Barrett and afterpunk of the time , resulted in some songs as singles resultones 'Like An Animal' and 'Punish Me With Kisses'". So while you could certainly also apply the quote to the album as a whole, the writer specifically called out two songs as examples, one of which being "Punish Me With Kisses", so the citation is valid. Robman94 (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manuel Pinazo reference
Talk:Still Life at the Penguin Cafe

message: NRCD Shop: David Bintley - Removed from the article for violating spam, but potentially useful for future references, etc. Noting here. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production instructions on how to perform the ballet
Talk:Aisha Campbell

message: it to my understanding for watch the episodes leading up to the beginning of Zeo that every ranger was sent on a quest to the roots/heritage in order to find a zeo subcrystal. it seems to me that unlike rocky ,adam and tommy aishadid really travel back in time. it's more like the vortex just moved her in that present time period. if thats hard to understading think of it like thats:
they were 17 years old in 1995,(the same year they sent the divded and sent the zeo crystal thourgh time ) time goes back 6 or 7 years 
making them either 10 years old in 1988 or 11 years old in 1989 (depending how they are suppose to be )with them being back in time anyway so to speak it pretty much a given that she did actully travel further back in time but was simply transported to africa in that year of 1988 or 1989.it this  would also explain how tanya come be the same age as the others and not several years older when the right time was restored. Inferno17 (talk) 16:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: reason why i changes some info
Talk:Embraco

message: This article seems to be a an Embraco promo.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.242.161 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted.  Added tag to encourage a re-write and expansion. —QuicksilverT @ 02:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written like an advertisement 

message: It would be helpful to give a schematic diagram and a picture showing the inside of an Embraco compressor.  What are inside this black metal ball?116.49.152.206 (talk) 02:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure inside an Embraco compressor 
Talk:Sri Lanka Railways

message: Merged Rail transport in Sri Lanka article into Sri Lanka Railways, WP:BOLD. These two subjects have a large overlap, and there seems to be very little difference in scope. They both discuss the rail network run by Sri Lanka Railways. Non SR run services provided by other private operators and discontinued services such as trams as well as proposed services such as metro are only differences in the scope.
Vatsmaxed (talk) 10:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged 

message: The premium services (if any still exist) need updating; ExpoRail is apparently defunct (needs a RS), and I couldn't ascertain if the Rajadhani Express is still in operation and (if so) under what name. Miniapolis 16:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operators 

message: In the article about Srilankan railways. Referring to Mihintale line it says the following:
"Anuradhapura (the capital of Sri Lanka for over 100 years)"
It should be corrected as: capital of Sri Lanka over 1000 years 70.49.0.77 (talk) 01:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sri Lankan Railways small inaccuracy
Talk:SS Cape Mohican (T-AKR-5065)

message: On May 21, 2001, the SS Cape Mohican (T-AKR 5065) was participating in an exercise at Chilpo Beach, just north of Pohang, South Korea. While in the harbor, heavy winds caused her to drag anchor approximately 150 feet and run aground on rocks, causing damage to her hull and internal tanks (Department of the Army, 2004). This damage required salvage work and emergency dry-docking along with 1500 tons of steel to make her seaworthy again (American Society of Naval Engineers, 2004).
Montes, A. (2005) 74.106.192.109 (talk) 04:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2001: Cape Mo runs aground off east coast of S.Korea
Talk:Leave Us Kids Alone

message: I added a couple of refs but I have my doubts as to whether this topic is notable. JMWt (talk) 14:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs
Talk:Merceditas Gutierrez

message: "Ombudswoman" is incorrect. It should be "ombudsman" regardless of gender of the official. "Ombudsman" is Scandinavian, and if it contrafactually be modified for the gender of the official, it would be "ombudskvinna". It should be "ombudsman". Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 13:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Retracted. Forget it. (ombudswoman). Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 13:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ombuds
wo
man
Talk:Contemporary architecture in Cluj-Napoca

message: Is there any reason for a "Modern architecture in Cluj-Napoca" article when there is no Architecture in Cluj-Napoca article?  I think it should be generalized. As a minimum, a redirect should be created so that link isn't red. Gene Nygaard (talk) 17:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope
File talk:Zuiderdam1.jpg

message: This image should be cropped ... the people in the water are not needed for illustrating the ship's entry.  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this. Not very pretty people. Leoesb1032 (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Out of Nowhere (Gloria Estefan song)

message: This song reached #94 in the UK. https://www.officialcharts.com/search/singles/out-of-nowhere/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:830A:B001:8400:E591:FE8B:7152:581C (talk) 12:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong chart position for the UK.
Talk:Environment & Energy Publishing

message: This article reads like ad copy. Example: "top tier coverage".
This entry seems to comprise of material based on material supplied by E&E either directly, or was copied by the author from E&E materials.
There is no critical overview on what editorial stance or bias E&E may have.
The entry suggests, probably inadvertently, that there may be some energy industry sponsorship involved, which would affect E&E's research and published material.
Someone with expertise in the subject should take a closer look at the article.
Petercascio (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this entry written by E&E? 

message: For example, the article "White House names EPA, Energy and USGS nominees" from 2022 is available at both the following URLs:
*
*
BhamBoi (talk) 03:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple URL schemes
Talk:Smart tag (Microsoft)

message: Should this page be in ?
Supporting references
* https://searchwindowsserver.techtarget.com/definition/Smart-Tags
* http://alistapart.com/article/smarttags
It seemed to be a big issue in 2001.  2001:630:206:FFFF:0:0:3128:B (talk) 12:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of the history of web annotation? 

message: Should there be a mention of the functionally (from a user perspective) similar Apple Data Detectors technology (from the mid-late 1990s, subject of a patent lawsuit against Samsung in the 2010s in regards to smartphones and Android, and now common-place in iOS)?
(It doesn’t appear to be mentioned at Named entities / Named-entity recognition, either, unless it is being referred to there under a different name.)
- Jim Grisham (talk) 22:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of similar technologies?