lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ridgway's rail

message: A little bit of cleanup needed here. Tasks I'd suggest as a priority are:
* adopting Wikipedia standards for the bird's (and "Common" Clapper Rail's) English name
* removing confusion over the bird's taxonomic status (it can't really be both a species and a subspecies of another species, as the lead says
SP-KP 18:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a "species", but an "endangered species". Unfortunately, endangered "species" need not be taxonomic species. There's really no otehr way to express it in the article,I'm afraid. Circeus 19:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes there is ... you just need to give it a bit more thought. How about, for example, "The California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) is a subspecies of the Clapper Rail. It has been classified as "endangered species" by XXX (the categorisation system used by XXX uses the term "endangered species" regardless of the taxonomic status of the form in question)" SP-KP 19:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

text: as far as i know this is the talk page :)  there is now no reference to the "common clapper rail" and i think your other issues have been addressed. have you read the endangered species page recently.  it's been edited and should meet your objection.  if not, have at it and fix endangered species to your liking, regards Anlace 20:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it equivocation to state that an endangered species is a species?  Did you mean to use a different word, or is there a nuance I'm not picking up on?  It's somewhat redundant, but I don't think we can easily get around that while maintaining accuracy.  Or are you concerned that a subspecies may also be endangered?  It is my understanding that an organism is an individual, not a population. This conversation probably belongs at Talk:Endangered species, but I don't know if you have that on watch. NickelShoe 21:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry that should have been unequivocal. I agree that a conversation is needed at Talk:Endangered species about the usages of the term; however, thanks to the work of User:jimfbleak the problems I flagged with this page all now appear to be sorted out - well done Jim. SP-KP 19:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tasks 

message: this is a usable article and meets WP NPOV reqs; writing is good and coverage is satisfactory; could easily become a good article with more work on range and references. Importance is high because of the conservation status of this species. Cdcdoc 05:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rerated as C as areas missing (description being one) and needs linline cites Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: First assessment
Talk:Stars Fell on Alabama

message: * That's a great recording. It is of course, one of countless performances by a great number of notable artists. Is this one example of exceptional note (and if so, whom would we cite to that effect) or do we propose creating a list on this page of all notable recordings and performances? (All-Music Guide lists 285 recordings, and I'm sure that their list is incomplete). --Dystopos 06:17, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Louis and Ella

message: Anyone interested in this song needs to go to YouTube and search the name RICHARD HIMBER. The list will give you an excellent reproduction of the song with a great vocal by Joey Nash. It is a great listening experience.
--Bob McArthur 23:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stars Fell .... Listen to It!! 

message: It's a song 2603:300D:204:FF00:C4EA:3A2:A7A1:27BA (talk) 01:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stars ⭐ fell in alabama
Talk:Preparing for Emergencies

message: In modern usage, the word "scheme" (as opposed to, perhaps, "plan") has a negative connotation, even though, strictly speaking, it is an appropriate term. Should we substitute a more neutral word in this article?  CommanderFalafel 19:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm tempted to say "programme", but that might confuse people into thinking it was television based. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 20:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it's a "campaign." CommanderFalafel 12:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Scheme"
Talk:Renault Alpine GTA/A610

message: So this is an article about two distinct but similar-looking cars? That's what it seems to suggest anyway, but maybe its just ambiguously written. So we either need some clarity here or someone to split the article. I'd do it myself if I knew enough about the subject matter but alas, I don't.
86.174.95.247 (talk) 18:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: The GTA pictured has the Le Mans pack applied, this should be made clear, especially as the car variants aren't even detailed in the article! Ideally the main picture of the article would be the unmodified one. --Saf 3 (talk) 00:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarity required

message: The article Alpine GTA appears to be a loosely translated version of the original French article, and has some overlapping content with this article. Maybe a merger or redirect would be in order. Deepred6502 (talk) 12:36, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "Alpine GTA"
Talk:Great Hinckley Fire

message: The merger would be a good idea. Dr. Dan 17:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: There is no possible way this fire burned 400 square miles in four hours. See the progress of the current BWCA fire even in high winds.  I removed this bit of info from the article -Ravedave 17:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, this is documented, so it should be returned. 72.11.102.187 (talk) 18:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  four hours? 

message: The article as written variously describes the final size of the Hinckley Fire as being , , and greater than , while the single online reference says .  I realize that a historical event like this may not have an exact measurement, but does anyone have access to a more authoritative reference? -- BlueCanoe (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of fire 

message: Is the size of this quotation acceptable with regards to Wikipedia's policy on quotations, copyright, and use of non-free content?  It seems pretty large -- perhaps we can work on paraphrasing and citing the Hinckley Fire Museum as an inline reference? -- BlueCanoe (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large quotation from Hinckley Fire Museum 

message: Sure this is correct? That the relatively cooler 1,100°C forest fire was trapped/capped by a layer of much hotter air above it? Doesn't really make sense...   Leo   86.83.56.115 (talk) 14:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temperature inversion?
Talk:Thomas Fallon

message: Remove the statement about Mayor trying to decide what to do and instead replace it with a line about the statue being removed in April of 2023
https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/04/25/infamous-san-jose-statue-of-thomas-fallon-is-taken-down/?utm_email=85F3B5B424B505D68405023E00&g2i_eui=&g2i_source=newsletter&lctg=85F3B5B424B505D68405023E00&active=yesD&utm_source=listrak&utm_medium=email&utm_term=https%3a%2f%2fwww.mercurynews.com%2f2023%2f04%2f25%2finfamous-san-jose-statue-of-thomas-fallon-is-taken-down%2f&utm_campaign=bang-mult-nl-pm-report-nl&utm_content=curated TheStevePousty (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Milo8505 (talk) 09:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 April 2023
Talk:Union shop

message: This article cannot be classed as "high" on the Importance scale.  That assessment is not justified by the article at all.  In fact, in many countries, this concept does not even exist; in others (such as where compulsory unionism exists) it is not an issue. - Tim1965 (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: This article is really janky in terms of describing the rules surrounding a Union Shop in the United States. It also needlessly confuses the term "Union Shop" for readers who want to understand the distinction made by closed-shop vs. union-shop vs. right-to-work.
The term "Union Shop" remains the broadly accepted term in the U.S. for all states in which union dues can be required of workers as a condition of employment. There is a single citation to Pattern Makers League of North America v NLRB which gives little concrete legal opinion that the Pattern Makers decision invalidates the union shop, outside of some rhetorical remarks in Justice Blackmun's dissent. Pattern Makers prevents unions from levying fines against members who formally resign, but this distinction is not generally accepted as fundamentally changing the Taft-Hartley Act's notion of a "Union Shop," which has was understood both before and after the decision as an establishment that mandates union dues, but does not allow unions say over hiring decisions like a closed shop.  Declaring that it does deem the Union Shop illegal is a rhetorical device, not a generally accepted legal opinion.
This is important simply for the sake of defining commonly used terminology. Non "right-to-work" laws in the U.S. are referred to as "Union Shop" states. Wildgunman (talk) 22:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality of the Union Shop in the US
Talk:DB Class 101

message: The 4th paragraph of the history seems completely out of line with the rest of the history section :"In December 1989..." Probably 1992-3? In any case, I didn't find the corresponding dates on the German Wikipedia page, and I speak enough German to understand most of the article. Hayazin (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree - and a worse translator even than Google Translate.  Especially on technical terms. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 07:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I tried doing some copyediting on a couple of sections, but I soon realized that I needed either more expertise with trains or to be fluent in German to continue.  This page is a rough translation from the german WP page on this subject and needs the attention of a translator before it can be copyeditied. Tony P 00:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Kincardineshire

message: Is this related to the Howe of the Mearns? bmearns.....(talk) 17:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. The Howe o' the Mearns starts just south of the Mounth and takes up most of southern Kincardineshire. The Mearns is an alternative name for Kincardineshire and the English word for Howe is Hollow, ie Lowland. So an English translation of The Howe o' the Mearns might be The Lowlands of Kincardineshire. -- Derek Ross | Talk 20:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fascinating, thanks for the info. bmearns.....(talk) 23:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Howe of the Mearns
Talk:Felt Bicycles

message: I've been trying to figure out what to title the article (and hence, held off on creating it); thanks to User:NextMerckx for doing so. I've seen Felt Racing LLC and Felt International GmbH in Germany.  --Christopherlin 18:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:William Cave

message: Apostolici: or, the History of the lives, acts, death and martyrdoms of those, wo were contemporary with or immediately succeded the Apostles, 1677
I'm assuming the spelling succeded is an anachronism of the 1677 spelling in the actual title, and not a legitimate misspelling of the word succeeded - if I'm incorrect I invite anyone more knowledgeable in this entry than myself to make the change.  If I'm correct then this is just a note to myself and any others who in the future may be trolling for spelling errors to correct.  Cheers!  Longshot14 18:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling question
Talk:Torii Hunter

message: This article needs some serious re-org, cleanup, and removal of promotional/flowery language. I'll see what I can do. android79 18:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If I get the time in the next day or so, I will try to add some actual grammar to this page. 
"After exploding in the beginning of April in 2000, Hunter was sent down to AAA"
Yeah, I guess if the guy spontaneously combusted, the Twins had no choice but to send him down to the minors. I'll fix this stuff soon. Hsox05 17:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs cleanup DESPERATELY

message: I am editing this sentence "He has won eight Gold Glove Awards for his defensive prowess". He has only been in the league 8 years and didn't play full seasons his first two years. If you follow the links to gold glove winners you can see that he has won 6 gold gloves. All in a row. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hsox05 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold Gloves 

message: You should add that he is inadvertently for the segregation of his own race. 
If someone breaks the rules by sending another team champagne then this is truly a sign that he is an attempted saboteur of all that we would like to stand for in this game. logic begot logic. 
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/rumors/post/Has-baseball-lost-the-meaning-of-Jackie-Robinson?urn=mlb,76568  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fkylw (talk • contribs) 19:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He made similar idiotic comments last year. I don't think he realizes what desegregation was about at all. To him its all "praising african americans" not "treating EVERYONE EQUALLY" which was the intent. It's a very ironic comment because he says that these white players don't know what its about, when its very very clearly he who doesn't know what Jackie Robinson day is about. Hsox05 (talk) 15:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of our opinion of the man, the incident does warrant inclusion. It's controversial and received a good amount of media coverage. Include it in. Arnabdas (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More controversy.
Talk:Shag (artist)

message: I re-added http://www.shagwatch.blogspot.com/ after it was deleted by autobot. While blogs are "normally to be avoided", I think this one adds something moderately useful and should be excepted. Note that I have no personal connection whatsoever to whomever does the blog. Arjuna (talk) 02:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shagwatch blog
Talk:Atlantic Cape Community College

message: *Where was the Casino Career Institute originally opened in Atlantic City in 1978?
*Where was the Cape May Campus building originally? When did it open in Court House?
♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  17:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo 

message: On a technique for people who have too high sensitivity to hearing http://web.archive.org/web/20021010064552/http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/education/100702AUTISMCLASS.html
WhisperToMe (talk) 02:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some possible details to flesh out? 

message: Atlantic Cape Community College was designated as a Hispanic-serving institution in 2023. 69.116.76.28 (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it.  We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in the sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse.   ElKevbo (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hispanic-serving institution
Talk:Chromosome 5q deletion syndrome

message: "5q- syndrome" is an inexact (but often used) term which only refers to the acquired deletions of 5q commonly seen in myelodysplastic syndrome, a hematological ("prelukemia") disorder. And MDS is not rare.
The 5q- syndrome is unrelated to constitutional (i.e., germ-line) deletions of chromosome 5, That clarification seems unnecessary in the intro section.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dosware (talk • contribs) 17:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction - restrict discussion to acquired 5q- deletions
Talk:Rani Padmini

message: Rani padnini 113.11.5.89 (talk) 15:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rani padamini 

message: I had added some comments in the historicity section. But later on I found that a Wikipedia editor named "Utcursch" had reverted it back to older version .
This is so wrong.He is just adding his own version and his perception of history.
This person is influenced by leftist ideology and doing bullshit on Wikipedia. Abhimanyu200 (talk) 19:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You added unsourced content, and removed sourced content. Please see WP:V and WP:RS. utcursch | talk 17:39, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Utcursch is changing Wikipedia page as per his interpretation
Talk:Hammir Singh

message: any comments?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.117.38.118 (talk) 15:36, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi , What i heard in local stories of Swimadhopur, that Hammir was a Meena of Tatu gotra (a clan from chouhan)
Talk:Common ownership

message: Are Index Funds Evil? follows José Azar using "common ownership" for a single owner having significant ownership shares across an industry.
If there is a common name for this phenomenon, it should go as a "not to be confused" or "for" note.
--Error (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single owner having significant ownership shares across an industry.
Talk:Maldeo Rathore

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: if you don't  mind can you give me info about these sources i would like to put them in proper format in the article.
Jodhpur Khyat p. 76
Vir Vinod II p. 812
Marwar ri pargana ri Vigat vol II p. 60
Arms & Armour at the Jaipur court by Robert Elgood p.10 Heba Aisha (talk) 11:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more info 

message: There is some problem with this section, earlier primary source of 16th century was used as citation which i removed. Other source by Parihar doesnt say what is included in the page. Year is different too. I am going to read some other good sources on the subject to make sense of it. I will edit the page after that. Sajaypal007 (talk) 21:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding war with mughals.
Talk:Chew Valley

message: I have significant concerns with whether or not this 2006 promotion meets the modern standards.  There is uncited text throughout, as well as lead material not supported in the body, such as .  The history section includes nothing much in the way of post-1900 history.  There's extremely little information about the economy of the region.  A couple of the source, particularly The Modern Antiquarian, look a bit questionable.  Some information is potentially dated.  I'm not convinced that this meets the current sourcing or comprehensiveness requirements. Hog Farm  Bacon 04:14, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA concerns
Talk:Cross-country jump

message: Why is the unverifiable tag there?  Cross country is a VERY common term used amongst skydivers to describe this kind of jump.  Its not like someone saw it on some book then decided to do it later.  You cant really point a URL reference  to 30+ years of word of mouth.  --Skydivemayday 04:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unverified

message: I dispute the unencyclopaedic tag for this article. It describes a style of a sport, much like downhill is for skiing. TheConsortium 18:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree Copysan 23:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Likewise. I'm removing it. Skydiver 15:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I've added some more detail in the article. I hope it's more appropriate than the part you removed. Skydiver 12:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Much more information driven. I like how it is like now. TheConsortium 19:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic Tag 

message: I've removed the "Importance"-tag. 
An article is "important" enough to be included in Wikipedia if any one of the following is true:
#There is evidence that a reasonable number of people are, were or might be concurrently interested in the subject (eg. it is at least well-known in a community).
#It is an expansion (longer than a stub) upon an established subject.
#Discussion on the article's talk page establishes its importance.
I know there's a reasonable number of jumpers that are interested in cross-country jumps. Plus I've now established the importance of the subject by discussing it on the talk page. :P 
Sources or references are a bit more difficult to find. USPA SIM doesn't mention cc jumps, and I don't know where else to look. Maybe an old issue of Parachutist or Skydiving? Skydiver 16:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance tag 
Talk:Prime Minister of Kosovo

message: Jusuf Zejnullahu was President of the Executive Council from 15 Jule 1990 to 5 October 1991. Bujar Bukoshi succeeded him to 1 February 2000. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old PMs 

message: I'm good Experience Bicycle manufacturing factory frame welding section supervisor, I Need one job and visa in Kosovo 202.86.222.147 (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work permit visa
Talk:Joan Benoit

message: According to the Portland Press Herald, in an interview with Joan in advance of the 2008 trials, that race was to be her retirement race.  What supports the information here that she retired years earlier?--Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "After Retirement" Section 

message: The article should be under Joan Benoit Samuelson, her married name, which is what she is always called in the news.  She registered for the 2008 Olympic trials under "Joan Samuelson" (or they dropped her middle name from the listings).  She hasn't been called Joan Benoit since the 80s.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 00:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change/move 
Talk:Western New York

message: The use of WNY to describe a 17 county area seems highly unusual to me as a longtime WNYer. While I’m not opposed to mentioning it if it is one way WNY is or has been used, I wonder if it should be the main definition used throughout the article and the frame through which every other section of the article is written. It seems especially strange to me that the main reference provided for such a definition is an obscure travel website. Longtime WNYer (talk) 12:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Typically I've viewed Western New York as the counties of both the Buffalo and Rochester Combined Statistical Areas (CSA).G. Capo (talk) 21:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

text: I agree with you that it's problematic to pick just one definition to use throughout the article, especially one from a single non-official source.  Powers T 21:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should article prioritize a 17 county definition of WNY?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Zeta Phi Rho

message: Previous local fraternities' AfDs:
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Tau Psi
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Chi Epsilon
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rho Sigma, est. 1935
Note: these were ones I was involved in, if you know of more, throw them up here.  RasputinAXP  c  19:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)