Talk:Culture jamming

message: What is it? A quick google search yielded nothing, and certainly nothing in terms of culture jamming.
Skooma2112 (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd never heard of it, but it's in the refs (5 and 6). --Trevj (talk) 05:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Night discourse 

message: This is an essay written in first person language. Keep the "list of culture jamming organizations" and drop the rest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dnavarro (talk • contribs) 20:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First person language 

message: After reading the discussions on the definition above (loved the story about Ms Mason '09), I've re-written the opening paragraphs of the article.  I was mainly attempting to tighten things up a bit, and to remove some of what I thought were the more glaring NPOV violations.  I also removed the section on types of culture jammers; although it was entertaining, it was biased, written in the wrong tone, and stolen entirely from another source.
I've removed the dispute tag, since it's clear that the incorrect passage is gone and nobody wants to put it back.  I've left the citation tag there, because after all, I didn't add any citations either.  fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 11:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't feel a minor rewrite is enough. I'm a fairly well educated person, but I am having difficulty understanding what "culture jamming" is, from reading the first several hundred words. How much of the article do I have to read, in order to "get it"? --Uncle Ed (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor rewrite 

message: Worth pointing out The Prisoner episode It's Your Funeral referred to jamming in a political context back in the mid 1960s. --MacRusgail (talk) 19:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Saying that it comes from there would be an extreme version of original research, which is not allowed here. Kansan (talk) 05:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jamming comes from ''The Prisoner''? 

message: The introduction includes the sentence: "Many culture jams are simply aimed at exposing questionable political assumptions behind commercial culture so that people can momentarily consider the branded environment in which they live."
I am concerned that labeling the assumptions behind the consumerist status quo as "questionable" may not be neutral. I thought about changing it to something like "that are perceived to be questionable", but by that point, the sentence would be getting rather unwieldy. Thoughts? Kansan (talk) 05:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable political assumptions? 

message: The interesting thing in this article is that it only cites the relation between “culture jamming” and plain VANDALISM with only one line of text. But many people knows that the relation goes much more deep…--177.32.130.81 (talk) 09:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism with a euphemistically beautiful face 

message: What's he doing in this list? Nothing in the linked article...someone's joke? 2fs (talk) 04:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luther Vandross? 

message: In my opinion the list should be split off from the rest of the article for content reasons. This list breaks the flow of the article, which can then refocus on the topic at hand. Incidentally, I believe the proper name should be "List of culture jamming organizations or and people." --Andrewaskew (talk) 06:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: --Andrewaskew (talk) 05:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: It's unclear to me what the "References" section is. If these are used as sources for the article then they are General references and the section should be re-named, and ideally inline citations should be added to them. If they are not used as sources, then they should be merged in to the "Further reading" section. GA-RT-22 (talk) 23:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the "References" section?