Talk:List of One Piece chapters (1–186)

message: I just thought that in order to raise the article on the assesment scale, we could arreange it the same as List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes, which is a Featured article.
The table is basiclly the same, except for the air date (since it wasn't aired). I'm going to try and make an article with that idea in mind on my sandbox (create.. all I have to do is insert the info). Opinions? Kurigiri 19:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, forget I even said anything. Kurigiri 20:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-design 

message: WAS this chapter already published,or not? New Babylon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by New Babylon (talk • contribs) 13:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Information on the chapter typically is revealed by subscribers as soon as they receive it, which tends to be the week before the magazine goes on sale at newsstands. So even though it isn't "officially" out according to its street date, it's still out there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Julian Grybowski (talk • contribs) 14:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chapter 437

message: I asked something similar before,but is this a subscribers info or not?Looked on One Piece Manga Online version 2 & 3 ,plus done a general search on Google for "One Piece Chapter 441" and it didnt spit out anything.
New Babylon 15:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 441. Darkness!

message: For those of you who dont know,its golden week in Japan,so there will be no One Piece chapters-just to avoid fake "chapters" sneaking in like it hapened with "441. Darkness!".
New Babylon 20:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No Chapters this week

message: Maybe it should be done in the same way as List of Naruto Chapters. Its much easier to understand it and it has the cover of the volumes.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.13.23 (talk • contribs) 
:So, something like this?
:
Cover                        	Title       	Title                      	Volume	Release date    	Release date
Cover                        	English     	Japanese                   	Volume	Japan           	US
                             	            	                           	      	                	
100px|Volume 1 Japanese Cover	Romance Dawn	ROMANCE DAWN —冒険の夜明け—      	1     	24 December 1997	June 2003
100px|Volume 1 Japanese Cover	
;Chapters
* 001.	
* 002.	
* 003.	
* 004.	
* 005.	
* 006.	
* 007.	
* 008.	
;Chapters
* 001.	
* 002.	
* 003.	
* 004.	
* 005.	
* 006.	
* 007.	
* 008.	
;Chapters
* 001.	
* 002.	
* 003.	
* 004.	
* 005.	
* 006.	
* 007.	
* 008.	
;ISBN
* (JP)	
* (US)	
;Cover character(s)
* Monkey D. Luffy
* Roronoa Zoro
* Nami	
;ISBN
* (JP)	
* (US)	
;Cover character(s)
* Monkey D. Luffy
* Roronoa Zoro
* Nami
:The only problem I can foresee is that, as with the template for anime episodes, the images might be judged unnecessary and eliminated from the format altogether. —Julian Grybowski 22:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-design (part 2) 

message: I have removed all or a majority of the fair use images on this page as their use was not in line with our Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria policy (likely in that the use is not minimal (3.a.) and it is in a list or a gallery (8.)) or our Wikipedia:Non-free content guideline that states that cover images may only be used for critical commentary on the cover itself, not just identification. Please do not re-add them without discussion. Kotepho 09:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use image removal 

message: If no one else is working on adding the required references (sources for ISBN I'm assuming), I'll begin working on it tomorrow. This is one of the few OP articles I feel is necessary on Wikipedia. Ark (talk) 19:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The main thing needing sourcing are the prose sections. See some of the FL chapter lists for what the lead should contain, and what needs sourcing. For the table itself, I've fixed the ELs to put them properly as general references. They have the ISBNs and release dates for the individual Japanese volumes. Viz's page, however, does not have release dates, so individual references are needed for all of those. Also all the prose in the uncollected chapters section. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I've gone ahead and done the intro rewrite, and axed out the prose in the uncollected chapters (OR/PO that doesn't belong anyway). If you'd like to work on adding refs for statements in the intro, that'd be cool, and for the individual English release dates, that would be cool. If not, I'll work on the lead refs later today. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Viz gives release dates for all but the first four volumes. A trip to Amazon should fill that gap. ~SnapperTo 20:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, good to know! I just checked the first volume. :P -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blah tags 

message: Hey, I have a problem with the portion of the translation of the Chapter 502 title of 天竜人 as "Celestial Dragon".  By translating it as such, I believe it does not take into account the 人 aspect of the group of kanji, which qualifies it as a person.  Anyone reading this title would assume that it is actually referring to a "dragon."  I believe it should be left intact as an untranslatable "Tenryuubito," or changed to something altogether different.  Any suggestions or comments?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captainjustin (talk • contribs) 20:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Similar term is used in Dragon Quest VIII, so a good choice would be to use the same translation used for the game, Dragovians.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.7.248.6 (talk) 10:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapter 502 

message: Should a sentence be added about the pilot, i read it recently and thought it might be worth mentioning?82.69.83.28 (talk) 03:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pilot 

message: That section seems out of place down there. How about moving it to the main article? If so, should we put it under Data books or give its own sub-section within the Media section? -- Goodraise (talk) 15:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that would be fine. It was just shoved here because of a merge discussion. I think just mentioning it with the databooks would be sufficient as they have no actual impact on the story itself. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Straw Hat Theater 

message: As a byproduct of the discussion above, it seems we have a consensus to split this page up into smaller pieces. But not unlike the episode list, this one could be split in several ways, one worse than the other. Sadly and unlike Naruto, One Piece isn't divided by the author, other than in chapters and volumes of course. That leaves the choice with us. The options I can think of right now are as follows:
* Pick a natural number N and make a cut every N volumes.
* Make cuts at dividing plot positions, like for example "entering the Grand Line/New World".
* Go by story arcs, like "East Blue, Crocodile, Skypia, CP9, ...", to generate rather similar sized chunks.
Personally, I am leaning towards picking a number. Naruto makes the cut at 27, IIRC. We could split 25/25/2+. So, here's my question: If we split, where should we do it?
BTW, I whipped up a basic List of One Piece manga volumes in my user-space using List of Naruto manga volumes as the basis. -- Goodraise (talk) 07:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pick a number. List of One Piece chapters (1–186) (first twenty volumes) for instance. 40-60K is generally fine for one of these pages. Anything below and you're too small, and anything above and it's probably too big. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 17:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

text: You could split along the same lines as the guide books. That's as official a divider as you're going to find. ~SnapperTo 20:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds promising. How do the guidebooks divide them? (I don't own the guidebooks. And even if I did, I don't speak Japanese...) -- Goodraise (talk) 20:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Like the Naruto and Bleach data books, it's open to interpretation. The first One Piece guide book (Red) shows the abilities of Baroque Works' officer agents, but has nothing on Mr. 7 and Miss Father's Day. Based on that I'd say it covers volumes 1 through either 21 or 22. Once I've had a better chance to look at it and the other books I'll have a more certain answer. If this dividing scheme were to be used, you could title the articles something like List of One Piece chapters (Red). ~SnapperTo 21:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, that looks weird. Even if you're using the data books as a dividing line, I would still have the tile as List of One Piece chapters (#–#) for clarity's sake. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 01:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well whatever the choice, the most recent event I see in Red is the defeat of Mr. 1, which is right at the end of volume 21. The most recent event in Yellow is the end of Blackbeard vs. Ace. Even though that bleeds into the start of 46, stopping at 45 should suffice as a cut off point. As for Blue, I have no idea what Blue is; its structure and content are completely different from Red and Yellow, and it ends only a few volumes after Red (Bellamy territory [volume 24]). I'm going to ignore it. So that would be List of One Piece chapters (1–21), List of One Piece chapters (22–45), and the leftovers should be dumped at List of One Piece volumes until a proper article scope can be defined. Unless anyone likes the idea of List of One Piece chapters (46+)? ~SnapperTo 04:42, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you would use the chapter numbers, not the volume numbers. Whatever dividing line you guys agree on is fine as far as I'm concerned. As for the new chapters, putting them in a List of One Piece manga volumes sounds good. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 06:43, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So far, so good. I guess I'll give it a shot. -- Goodraise (talk) 16:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Well, I tried to incorporate this guidebook idea into the lead, but it looks weird and I'm already haunted by nightmares over having to justify that "open to interpretation" thing at FLC. I'm gonna change the divisions to twenty volume chunks and see if anyone reverts it. -- Goodraise (talk) 17:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: I don't have enough time to make the changes myself, but I thought I should mention that it's supposed to be "Zolo" instead of "Zoro", unless there's a different character called "Zoro", that I mysteriously keep missing, checking inside my OnePiece volume. Thanks! Jds500 (talk) 17:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roanoa Zolo 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion