lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Garden District, Toronto

message: This page has been mislabelled. The neighbourhood is called the Garden District (no ‘s’ in Garden). I suggest that it be renamed “Garden District, Toronto” to distinguish it from the article for Garden District, New Orleans.
I’ve read the How to Rename a Page article, but I don’t have a ‘move’ button on my page where it says it should be.
*Done. In future, please sign your comments with four tildes: ~~~~. This identifies to other readers who made the comment and when. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 18:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Electrical conductance

message: So Heaviside coined this term in 1885 but waited two more years to come up with "admittance"? Might be true, but should be checked/verified. --Osquar F 13:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age of the term

message: Is it confirmed that the origin of the letter G for conductance is "Gate"? or is that a mnemonic for remembering? 
--Pkatz (talk) 13:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orgin of G
Talk:Angular acceleration

message: Can someone explain why constant and non-constant torque are treated differently? Also, the article refers to equations of motion, but the torque/acceleration equation isn't really an equation of motion.
Serrano24 (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: With non-constant torques, to obtain the angular position as a function of time requires carrying out some integrals (or, equivalently, solving a differential equation).  This is quite different from the constant torque (constant angular acceleration case) where we can use the angular counterparts to the equations of uniformly acclerated motion.  In the non-uniform torque case you would write
I \alpha = \tau_{net} (t)
I \frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2} = \tau_{net} (t)
which is now a differential equation.  Differential equations of this form (second time derivative of position related to some -- possibly time varying -- sum of forces/torques) are what are refered to as "equations of motion", so I'm not sure I see why you say that the torque/acceleration equation isn't an equation of motion.
Would something along the lines of what is above be a good addition to the section of the article on non-constant torques? --GLeeDads (talk) 16:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question 

message: The equation which gives angular acceleration as
\alpha = \frac{\mathbf{a}_T}{r}
is incorrect because it denotes \alpha as a scalar but the tangential acceleration as a vector.  It is probably best to drop the bold and specify that a_T is the magnitude of the tangential acceleration.  I would just make this change myself, but I'm completely new to Wikipedia and don't know the etiquette yet. -- GLeeDads (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vectors in definition of angular acceleration 

message: The word Velocity has the connotation distance per unit time and therefor is not a good word to use about Angular acceleration, since Angular acceleration is about the time rate of change of the angle of direction of motion and not about distance.WFPM (talk) 12:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Description terminology
Talk:Christina of Norway, Infanta of Castile

message: In English language sources, this woman is normally called Christina. That is not "Anglicisation" of her name; it's purely WP:UE and WP:Common name. More than 1000 books call her Christina, while only 86 call her Kristina. Surtsicna (talk) 10:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christina or Kristina 
Talk:Michael Strange

message: I'm interested in the reasoning for the article being named for Oelrich.  She lived the later part of her life as Michael Strange and was buried as Strange.  At the time of death her obits were headlined with Strange.  In terms of consistency, Eric Blair's wiki is under George Orwell.  Has there ever been a consensus vote on which name to use for this article?  24.249.78.115 (talk) 22:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this. She chose to be Michael Strange and lived under that name most of her life up to her death. The article should be renamed. How do we up this question to admin? Thmazing (talk) 01:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The article says she was born in New York City, but the infobox says she was born in Newport, Rhode Island. Which is true? Blaylockjam10 (talk) 22:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Small quibble: In the Life and Career section, it describes Strange as being several months pregnant with her husband's child when marrying in August 1920, then giving birth to that child in March 1921. I'm not sure that "several months" is possible at that point; at best, she was 1-2 months along when they married. Can someone confirm the timeline?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.14.81 (talk) 19:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pregnancy timing
Talk:Box-office bomb

message: Is "box-office disappointment" another name for "box-office bomb" or "box-office flop"? 45.72.195.21 (talk) 23:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: All box-office bombs are "disappointments", but not all box-office disappointments are bombs. A box-office disappointment can still go into profit, but a bomb has to lose a huge sum of money. A "flop" is somewhere inbetween: any film that loses money is a flop, but not necessarily on a large enough scale to qualify it as a bomb. Betty Logan (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  "A box-office disappointment" From what I have noticed in film descriptions over the years, some films may have been reasonably profitable, but were labeled box-office disappointments because they performed below expectations in either the worldwide market or whatever local market the studio prioritized. Leading to scrapped plans for sequels and franchises. The term "bomb" is reserved more for films which caused considerable losses for the studio. Dimadick (talk) 09:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: But the information isn't even controversial in the sense that no other sources seems to be disputing this info. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 02:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do other sources support it? Mike Allen  02:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question here also, as in do other editors support it? As disputed content, the WP:ONUS is on the editor seeking to add (re-add) this content to also seek a consensus in support of it. (also pinging , the editor who removed the content a couple months back) - wolf 03:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with User:MikeAllen here. User:Aman.kumar.goel, Buzzfeed may be reliable enough to quote for reviews or whatever, but we should not have an article about movies that were bombs define what we say a bomb is; we need an article that explains what a bomb is in a more general sense. And it certainly shouldn't be one particular publication with, possibly, its own possible spin. Drmies (talk) 08:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

text: "Editors find the quality of BuzzFeed articles to be highly inconsistent." The sister publication BuzzFeed News used to have higher standards for journalism. BuzzFeed regularly publishes listicles, it has been involved in several plagiarism controversies, and it has been accused of having an editorial policy which heavily favors its corporate sponsors (such as Hasbro, Microsoft, and Pepsi). Having in the past deleted any content which may criticize its sponsors. Dimadick (talk) 10:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box-office disappointment 

message: The redirect Box office Bombay has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Box office Bombay]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Lili Damita

message: Before she was married to Erol Flyn, she had an affair with Louis Ferdinand von Preussen, who wanted to marry her but couldn't, because of his Grandfather's (the Kaiser) dissaproval. Cf. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5eveUVrO9M 21:34 f.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.101.85.255 (talk) 17:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before marriage
Talk:T-34/Archive 3

message: I'm removing the following addition
: Hitler reportedly remarked that if he'd known that the Russians were capable of making so many, he'd have second thoughts about invading
I recall that Hitler said he wouldn't have invaded the USSR if he'd believed Guderian's published statement that it had 10,000 tanks at the start of the war.  In fact it had 30,000, although many obsolescent and in disrepair.  Anyway, my recollection is that this was not directly related to the rate at which T-34's could be produced.  If I'm mistaken, please set me straight—a reference would be helpful, too.  —Michael Z. 2006-07-31 19:18 Z
::: My recollection matches yours - the statement had nothing to do with the T-34 itself. Also IIRC the total Soviet tank park in June 41 was around 20,000, but whatever - that's irrelevant to the point right now. DMorpheus 19:30, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitler's intelligence
Talk:Ampere-turn

message: Could clarify that the size of the loop has no effect, and if the shape affects the magnetic field strength ? - Rod57 (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shape or size of the loop 

message: ????????  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.105.180.150 (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "NI" and why isn't it linked 

message: Over the lifetime of this article the capitalisation of the abbreviation has been changed at least three times, from "AT to "At", back to "AT" and then back to "At" again, without any citation or other justification on any occasion. What is the correct abbreviation? Can anyone give a definitive answer with references?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.227.118 (talk) 09:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation of the abbreviation
Talk:Greek battleship Lemnos

message: Does it make sense to have two separate articles about the same ship? john k (talk) 20:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this states something about how if a ship had notable service in both navies, two articles is suggested. Buggie111 (talk) 23:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It says two articles may be appropriate.  I would suggest that two articles, in general, is not terribly appropriate, but it's true that that solves some naming issues. john k (talk) 01:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fork? 

message: I feel that
 
Kilkis and Lemnos sunk after German air attack, 1941.
should be
Lemnos (foreground) and Kilkis (background) sunk after German air attack, 1941
My conclusion rests on the photo of the Kilkis under air attack in her article and on a famous aerial photo of the Kilkis already sunk in my books. pietro151.29.200.96 (talk) 12:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  caption
Talk:Pombaline Reforms

message: I started the Pombaline Reforums page, its my first so I'm not quite sure if its exactly whats needed. I'll continue to add to it when I get more time.---Black Mage- 17:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 

message: Did the Pombaline Reforms really carry on for over 30 years after Pombal was dismissed? Perhaps. No doubt you've seen the rather odd section at the biography, where his main reform was apparently his war with the Jesuits?  To be honest, until there is a good deal more here, it might be better to use this material to improve the biography, and make this a redirect there. It will all still be in the history.  Good to see a link to J Ratton anyway! Johnbod (talk) 02:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I hadn't seen the date! No change since 2006, so I have merged it to Pombal. Johnbod (talk) 02:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Plus sizing

message: I can here for advice and can see that some clarification is requiered.  The R designation followed by an number say R15 refers to the diameter of the wheel, not the diameter of the tire.  Plus sizing changes the wheel size, and is NOT intended to change the diameter of the tire.  If you change the diameter of the tire it might not fit in the wheel well of the car.  Also changing the tire diameter would affect the speedometer of the car as well. 
* Nowhere the article says that plus sizing involves changing the tire diameter.
I came here to learn how the aspect ratio of the tire "the series number"  the 60 in 205 60 R16 refers to the ratio of the tire diameter to its width.  So does a 185 60 R15 have the same diameter as a 195 60 R15.  This is refered to a plus zero change.
* 185 60 R15 and 195 60 R15 have different tire diameters and IMHO it's not a plus zero change.
I completely agree with the last comment. I came here also to learn about aspect ratio. The article I found was not that but is also completely wrong. A larger tire would decrease performance, mess with spedometer, etc. A larger wheel (which is what is sized in inches in normal tire geometry) could increase performance, and not affect geometry if the tire diameter remained constant.
* The last comments refer to plus sizing just like the rest of the article: to a larger wheel with same diameter tire. The mentioned disadvantages are related to plus sizing, not to a larger tire.
Aside from the already mentioned comments, this entry is rife with technical errors and subjective opinions
* Please help by pointing them out.
:To the two above contributors: If you can improve the article in any way, please feel fee to do so. We newed people like yourselves to inprove the accuracy of our articles.--SlipperyHippo 22:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I've rewritten the article to make it flow a bit better and to deal with a few of the issues which were raised in the prior comments as well as correct some inaccuracies.
I've also moved the page to Plus Sizing since this is really what the article is about.  Tire sizing is what is dealt with by tire code and that title sould really point to that article.
there are no references that heavier rims do not decrease acceleration, that wider tyres decrease acceleration, etc  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.202.40.177 (talk) 21:55, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  april 2008 changes 

message: Car and Driver actually tested "plus sizing", and found results that conflict with opinions presented in this article. It may be a good source.
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/effects-of-upsized-wheels-and-tires-tested  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.149.1.64 (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual testing source
Talk:Incandescence

message: We need graphs/curves of the spectral emissions.-69.87.203.220 19:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spectral graphs 

message: Defs on the web, other than the one from wikipedia, are all about visible light, as are the ones in books that I've looked at.  So I changed it. Dicklyon (talk) 21:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions 

message: I added the info that incandescence becomes visible only around 400°C in the dark. I think it is important to give that as a rule of the thumb. I don't know if a reference is needed; I don't think the issue is very controversial. (I found this reference that says 390°C.) I wrote “most bodies” rather than “all” because a white body doesn't glow at all. Perhaps that could be better worded. David Olivier (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Threshold 

message: I don't understand the meaning of this sentence 
"While higher temperatures can increase efficiency, there are currently no materials able to withstand such temperatures which would be appropriate for use in fluorescent lamps."
Should that be "incandescent lamps" at the end of the sentence?
Bj norge (talk) 10:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Practical 

message: How is this different from thermoluminiscence? --200.59.188.242 (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor question 

message: Please discuss at Talk:Thermal radiation#Merge with Incandescence? Thanks! --Steve (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[thermal radiation]]? 

message: The article (currently) makes no reference to blackbody. But shouldn't it? DKEdwards (talk) 07:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably should, but if it were to be merged with thermal radiation the problem would be fixed as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.67.227.181 (talk) 00:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  blackbody  

message: I have severe doubts with regards to the colour table. See my comment here: Talk:Red heat#The coloured table image on the right 92.67.227.181 (talk) 16:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour table
Talk:Allied Pilots Association

message: * What I think should be changed (include citations):
The "Representation Services" section could use a lot more detail. There is a lack of information here. Please consider updating to the following:
Along with serving as the collective bargaining agent for the 14,000 pilots of American Airlines, APA provides a broad range of additional member services, which include lobbying on behalf of its members in Washington, D.C. APA leadership understands that the direction of the airline pilot profession is determined in large measure by policymakers in Washington, D.C. The APA Government Affairs Committee is entrusted with serving as the voice of APA pilots in our nation's capital.
APA’s positions on important aviation safety- and security-related issues are based on its pilots’ perspectives as subject-matter experts. All APA Government Affairs Committee members are current line-flying pilots for American Airlines with thousands of hours of experience in large civilian transport and high-performance military aircraft.
APA’s legislative success is due in part to the strength of the union’s Political Action Committee (PAC) fund. The APA PAC is used solely for congressional campaigns and does not fund any other APA expenses or salaries.
APA is also a member of the Washington, D.C.-based Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations, which includes approximately 28,000 professional pilots who work for a variety of passenger and cargo carriers.
APA devotes more than 20% of its dues income to support aviation safety.
* Why it should be changed:
Lacking in details.
DrewBoterf (talk) 14:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been done. ABT021 (talk) 03:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be, but I'm going to remove the text and mark this as declined as there is no source for this and the request above. , please provide a reliable secondary source for these requests. ~StyyxTalk? 20:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI edit request
Talk:Daraf

message: All of the information conveyed in this article is already conveyed in the Units section of the article on electrical elastance, so I feel that this is enough of a case to redirect this article to that section.
The section in Elastance is quite short, so expansion of Daraf could take place there instead.
Here is a link to the article's history in case there is any dispute on the matter. --EnronEvolvedMy Talk Page 18:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blank and redirect to [[Elastance#Units|Elastance § Units]]
Talk:American Guild of Musical Artists

message: This reads like it was taken from an AGMA recruiting pamphlet. I'm hard-core union (member of three; president of one local), but this is a blatant violation of our :WP:NPOV neutrality standards. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 17:17, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advocacy and NPOV violations 

message: Clicking on what links here there are only 14 actual articles:
Dance (links)
Lawrence Tibbett (links)
AFL-CIO (links) 
List of trade unions (links) 
Associated Actors and Artistes of America (links) 
Willamette Ballet Academy (links) 
San Francisco Symphony Chorus (links) 
Natan Brand (links) 
Canadian Actors' Equity Association (links) 
Actors' Fund (links) 
Richard Hurd (educator) (links)  
Cornell MacNeil (links) 
Éva Gauthier (links) 
Nedda Casei (links) 
While that certainly doesn't qualify this as an orphaned article, most references in Wikipedia to AGMA don't use a link and number of articles should be linked so I'll be working on that.  RevelationDirect (talk) 14:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Links Here 
Talk:Electro-osmosis

message: Reading what others write about it, I have the impression that this is a lousy description. 
:A. Terrence Conlisk, in Electrophoresis, Vol. 26, p. 1896–1912 (2005) [DOI: 10.1002/elps.200410238]:
::"... electroosmosis, which is defined as the motion of fluid past a solid surface due to an externally defined electric field"
:S. Yao und G. Santiago, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 268, pp. 133-142 (2003) [DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00731-8]:
::"The term electroosmosis refers to the bulk motion of an electrolyte caused by Coulombic forces acting on diffuse ions near a flow channel's solid/liquid interface."
To me this means a flow parallel to a solid surface. Hence, at least the flow through a thin membrane is not what one considers a primary example of electroosmosis. For thicker porous media or membranes with long channels, electroosmosis along the grains or channel walls will occur. Also, I see no reference to the electrical double layer, which seems to play an important role. Can an expert in the field please write a few words about this? --Anastasius zwerg 18:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lousy description 

message: but for the wrong reasons
eeo is caused by, in language appropriate for a general encyclopedia, the following
in the presence of water, eeo develops when a fixed surface has an electrical charge
because we live in an oxygen rich atmosphere, most surfaces have a neg charge
in water, the neg charge on the surface is compensated for by a pos charge in solution (you havve to an equal number of + and _ charges, otherwise a strong force develops)
when you apply a voltage across the solution, + and - ions move, and each carrys some water; the net trnasport of water is zero
however, the fixed surface charge can't move - but the + charge in solution cna
the + charge moves with its water, this results in net flow of water
note that this requires a fixed charge
note that the current article is NOT written at an appropriate level - it doesn't say how eeo varys with salt conc in the bulk fluid, the current, etc in SIMPLE language
note that since this is movement of water near fixed charges, if you have a pipe, the water moves only near the wall, as in the fluid in the pipe there are no fixed charges
the water layer that moves, under practical conditions, is thin - a micron or less
hence in a 1/2 inch diameter pipe (~12 cm) you dont notice net flow of water
in a capillary with 50micron ID, the bulk flow can be quite noticealbe
geez, cant any of you people who write these science articles bother to loweryourselves to the level appropraiate for a general encylopedia ???????
*by defintion* calculus is NOT appropriate, and if you diagree you are a schmuck  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.17.106 (talk) 20:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: u r right

message: The NEC has a reference to this phenominon in articel 310.2(II) as an informational note.  If anyone can clarify the effect it would be helpful to people "googling" it.  Thank you in advance for your work.  Cheers!
24.167.199.4 (talk) 13:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference in NEC