Talk:Indian termination policy

message: 41 tribes or bands were terminated California Rancheria Act. Please note that locations are not always tribal/band names. 
[http://digital.library.okstate.edu/KAPPLER/vol6/html_files/v6p0831.html#mn1 Public Law 85-671
August 18, 1958] H. R. 2824 72 Stat. 619 "To provide for the distribution of the land and assets of certain Indian rancherias and reservations in California, and for other purposes."
:To provide for the distribution of the land and assets of certain Indian rancherias and reservations in California, and for other purposes.1958] lists 41 names (Band noted by RCC): Alexander Valley(Wappo), Auburn(multiple groups), Big Sandy(Mono), Big Valley(Band Pomo), Blue Lake(Multiple groups:Yurok & Wiyot), Buena Vista(Miwok), Cache Creek(Pomo), Chicken Ranch (Miwok), Chico(Mechoopda), Cloverdale(Band Pomo), Cold Springs(Mono), Elk Valley(multiple groups), Guidiville(Band Pomo), Graton(Miwok), Greenville (Maidu), Hopland(Band Pomo), Indian Ranch, Lytton(Band Pomo), Mark West, Middletown(Band Pomo), Montgomery Creek, Mooretown(Maidu), Nevada City(Maidu, North Fork(Mono), Paskenta(Band of Nomlaki), Picayune(Chukchansi), Pinoleville(Band, Pomo), Potter Valley(Band Pomo), Quartz Valley(multiple groups-Karok, Shasta and Upper Klamath), Redding(combined), Redwood Valley(Band Pomo), Robinson(Band Pomo), Rohnerville (Bear River Band- Wiyot and Mattole), Ruffeys (unk), Scotts Valley(Band, Pomo), Smith River(Tolowa), Strawberry Valley(Maidu), Table Bluff(Wiyot), Table Mountain, Upper Lake(Pomo), Wilton(Miwok).
*Modocs while from California were "moved" to other states 
**Modoc Tribes OR Terminated 1954
**Modoc Tribes OK Terminated 1954 (restored 1978)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.10.60 (talk) 19:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just finished working on the Modocs. They were NOT from California, were from Oregon, and partially on the Klamath Reservation. The part of the tribe that were taken as prisoners to Oklahoma in 1873 after the Modoc Wars were terminated along with the Klamath. Congressional hearings showed most Oklahoma, Kansas and Missouri Modoc did not know they were part of the Oregon Termination. Thus, they were restored in 1978. Took almost a decade for the rest of the Klamath. I listed termination under Klamath and restoration under Oklahoma terminations/restorations and pointed them to each other on the page. SusunW (talk) 00:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: California

message: bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/
:Public Law               Tribal Group          Termination Date
:85-671    Alexander Valley Rancheria,CA          August 1, 1961
:85-671    Big Valley Rancheria, California     November 11, 1965
:85-671    Blue Lake Rancheria, California      September 22, 1966
:85-671    Buena Vista Rancheria, California    April 11, 1961
:85-671    Cache Creek Rancheria, California    April 11, 1961
:86-322    Catawba of South Carolina            July 1, 1962
:85-671    Chicken Ranch Rancheria, California  August 1, 1961
:85-671    Cloverdale Rancheria, California     December 30, 1965
:85-91     Coyote Valley Rancheria, California  July 10, 1957
:85-671    El Dorado Rancheria, California      July 16, 1966
:85-671    Elk Valley Rancheria, California     July 16, 1966
:85-671    Graton Rancheria, California         February 18, 1966
:85-671    Greenville Rancheria, California     December 3, 1966
:85-671    Guidiville Rancheria, California     August 30, 1965
:85-671    Indian Ranch Rancheria, California   September 22, 1964
:83-587    Klamath Tribe of Oregon              August 13, 1961
:80-335    Laguna Rancheria, California         February 4, 1958
:84-443    Lower Lake Rancheria, California     March 29, 1956
:85-671    Lytton Rancheria, California         August 1, 1961
:85-671    Mark West Rancheria, California      August 1, 1961
:85-671    Mooretown Rancheria, California      August 1, 1961
:85-671    Nevada City Rancheria, California    September 22, 1964
:85-671    North Fork Rancheria, California     February 18, 1966
:85-671    Paskenta Rancheria, California       April 11, 1961
:85-671    Picayune Rancheria, California       February 18, 1966
:85-671    Pinoleville Rancheria, California    February 18, 1966
:87-269    Poncas of Nebraska                   October 27, 1966
:85-671    Potter Valley Rancheria, California  August 1, 1961
:85-671    Quartz Valley Rancheria, California  January 27, 1967
:85-671    Redding (Clear Creek) Rancheria, CA. June 18, 1962
:85-671    Redwood Valley Rancheria, California August 1, 1961
:85-671    Rohnerville Rancheria, California    July 16, 1966
:85-671    Ruffeys Rancheria, California        April 11, 1962
:85-671    Scotts Valley Rancheria, California  September 3, 1965
:83-762    Shivwits, Kanosh, Koosharem and
:::Indian Peaks Bands of the Paiute
:::Indian Tribe in Utah               March 1, 1957
:85-671    Strawberry Valley Rancheria, CA      April 11, 1961
:85-671    Table Bluff Rancheria, California
:83-588    (Western Oregon) Certain tribes, bands, groups or communities of Indians located West of :::the Cascade    April 11, 1961
:::        Mountains in Oregon                August 13, 1956
:85-671    Wilton Rancheria, California         September 27, 1964
:83-671    Ute Indian Tribe of the Unitah and Ouray Reservation in Utah.
:::     (Mixed blood members only.)        August 27, 1961
::Thanks for the list. Supplied a lot of the missing dates for the California tribes. Apparently it is the list of effective dates they were terminated from Indian Health Services. SusunW (talk) 00:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Another list but not complete

message: Does anyone working on this page know the name of the female history professor of Native descent who describes how peoples will still not accept $20 but ask for 2 $10's and she also goes on to describe Andrew Jackson as America's Hitler?  Her comments were late in the episode of the November 2007 original airing of the Presidents:Andrew Jackson on the History Channel.  Alatari (talk) 13:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help 

message: The article is interesting but needs to provide some additional context for understanding unique aspects of Alaskan Native Americans' issues.  As a lay reader without much background, I don't understand the references to state land and aboriginals' land selection.--Parkwells (talk) 20:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Strengthen section on Alaska

message: The article says that the policy "was developed by Republican administrations during the 1950s and 1960s" 
How is this accurate considering that from early 1961 to early 1969 the White House was occupied by two Democrats (Kennedy and Johnson) and this time period (1950 to 1969) only saw two Republican presidents, Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon, and Nixon was the president responsible for ending Termination? If it was policy formulated under Eisenhower then the article should reflect that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.130.160.66 (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While the strongest advocates of the policy were Republican, I agree that this is misleading and should be reworded. Kennedy and Johnson inherited and continued the policy; it was during the Nixon administration that the federal government began to reverse course on this. - Jmabel | Talk 22:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Termination originated under the FDR's administration in the 1940s according to The encyclopedia of Native American economic history By Bruce Elliott Johansen. Termination started under a Democratic administration, not Republican. Throughout history Republicans have supported Native Americans. Republican had Native American Charles Curtis as vice-president. And as far as I know, Republicans are the only ones to return back land to Native American control. Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=BIQLMYyfHncC&pg=PA244&lpg=PA244&dq=Indian+termination+history+Franklin+d.+roosevelt&source=bl&ots=tcWvvwflMH&sig=oXp5CzcoBAatxoDa8nRjTTmjZDw&hl=en&ei=tooASpj2McSFtgeh6JGWBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2 Rob (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Republican Administrations?

message: No mention here of the Indian Relocation Act of 1956. Probably should be. - Jmabel | Talk 22:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: added it to policy section SusunW (talk) 01:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Indian Relocation Act of 1956

message: I have cited Getches, Cases and Materials on Federal Indian Law, for a period between 1945 and 1961. The timeframe is debatable. Anyone believe it should be otherwise? Afwm1985 (talk) 19:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeframe

message: As currently written, the article is quite contradictory with regard to the Indian Health Service.  At the start of the paragraph about health care, it states that one of the negative aspects of Termination was that once tribes were terminated, their members were no longer eligible for care by the Indian Health Service.  At the end of the paragraph, the creation of the Indian Health Service was one of the few positive developments coming out of Termination.  Well, which is it?  It obviously can't be both.  75.216.136.125 (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I finally fixed this issue. It wasn't the creation of the the Health service that came out of termination, it was the transfer of the service from control of BIA to the Public Health Service -- recognizing it wasn't an "Indian" problem, but a "health" concern. SusunW (talk) 20:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian Health Service 

message: Instead of the 190 tribes, I have been researching whether it is simpler to identify the 14 laws of termination. I sent to the US code and via various searches, found this (my numbering):
key words: tribe termination
:1.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XXXV- WYANDOTTE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
:2.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XL- MENOMINEE TRIBE OF WISCONSIN: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
:3.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XXXVII- OTTAWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
:4.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XXXVI- PEORIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
:5.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XIII- KLAMATH TRIBE: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
:6.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XLVI- PONCA TRIBE OF NEBRASKA: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
key words: indian termination
:7.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XXX- WESTERN OREGON INDIANS: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
:8.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XXXI- ALABAMA AND COUSHATTA INDIANS OF TEXAS: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
:9.      25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, SUBCHAPTER LXXVIII—YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO: RESTORATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION (§§ 1300g–1300g7) (This led me to try to find this tribe, which apparently like the Alabama-Couchatta transferred jurisdiction from the Federal Government to the state of Texas and thus, I found: 	https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/90/hr10599/text
:10.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XXXII- PAIUTE INDIANS OF UTAH: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
:11.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter XXVIII- UTE INDIANS OF UTAH: DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS BETWEEN MIXED-BLOOD AND FULL-BLOOD MEMBERS; TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION OVER PROPERTY OF MIXED-BLOOD MEMBERS
I was surprised that none of this search turned up the Choctaw or the California Rancherias. So, I input Choctaw and came up with this:
:12. Act of August 25, 1959, Pub. L. No. 86-192, 73 Stat. 420 (Choctaw Termination Act) 
and with key words: rancheria 
:13.	25 U.S. Code Chapter 14, Subchapter LXXXV- GRATON RANCHERIA RESTORATION
No mention of the termination of the Rancherias but it clearly happened as PUBLIC LAW 85-671 72 STAT. 619 AUG. 18, 1958
I find no other laws about termination other than the 1964 amendment to the California statute, which would then be the 14th statute:
Public Law 88-419 78 Stat. 390 August 11, 1964
Does this seem feasible as the list we are seeking? SusunW (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, so the list of 14 is wrong any way you count it. Don't know where that number came from I'm up to 15 already without counting Resolution 108 or the California Rancheria amendment. SusunW (talk) 07:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  14 Termination Laws 

message: I realize that the way the page is currently constructed is to keep it in chronological order, but that causes the reader to look in two different different places ("terminations" and "restorations") to follow the chronology for a specific state or tribe. I think it would be easier for the reader to understand the specifics for  each entity if they were in a single unit.
I propose that all of the discussion for policy occur first in a chronological manner and specific state/tribe discussions follow, also arranged chronologically. In this manner it will be much easier to follow when termination was implemented and revoked both from a policy standpoint and within a given entity. SusunW (talk) 05:07, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What I suggest doing first is a section-by-section improvement.  (Like remodeling a house, first see what can be fixed by fresh paint and a new carpet before you start tearing out walls...) Add sources, reword, delete the cruft, etc.  Then, as you go, some ways to improve organization will come together - I personally hesitate to move away from a chronological order without a real clear improvement, but as it sits this article is too scattered already.  I'd clean and consolidate first.  Montanabw(talk) 07:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically that is what I have been doing. If you go back to the version when I posted my comment originally, you had to look in 3 sections to follow the history for a single tribe. That was too confusing, so I consolidated all the information about a single tribe in that tribe's heading. First tried to get the underpinning policies. Then worked through the ones that were terminated. Then worked through the ones that never actually got terminated. Then I passed over Alaska, I know nothing about it and moved on to politics. Has been a major project, but slowly and steadily it is improving. SusunW (talk) 08:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page format reorganization 

message: Here is the count I come up with: 
*Emigrant Indians of New York: Brothertown 1
*Menominee Termination Act: Menominee 1
*Klamath Termination Act: Klamath, Modoc, Yahooskin Band of Snake Indians 3
*Western Oregon Indian Termination Act (act specified 61 bands, but the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community and Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians were conglomerates of the other bands.  So is this in actuality 59?)
*Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas Termination Act: Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas 1
*Ute Indians: only effected ½ of the tribe as only mixed bloods were terminated .5
*Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah: Kanosh Band of Paiutes, Koosharem Band of Paiutes, Indian Peaks Band of Paiutes, and Shivwits Band of Paiutes 4 bands
*Oklahoma Termination Acts: Ottawa Tribe, Peoria Tribe, Wyandotte (but Wyandotte wasn’t completed) 2
*California Rancheria Termination Act: 3 rancherias terminated prior to Public Law 85-671, 41 mentioned in Public Law 85-671, an additional 7 included in the amendment of 1964 and 5 that were never terminated but were listed, correcting the number of California Rancherias terminated from the oft-cited 41 to 46 
*Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina Termination Act: Catawba Indian Tribe 1
*Ponca Tribe of Nebraska Termination Act: Ponca Tribe of Nebraska 1
*Tiwa Indians of Texas Relinquishment Act: Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------
:If you use 59 for western Oregon and count the Ute as 1/2 TOTAL is 120.5 
:If you use 61 for western Oregon and count the Ute as 0 TOTAL is 122
In any case it is not 109, cited in the article. Which should be used? SusunW (talk) 05:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Find a reliable, third party source with a count that matches up.  Annoying as it is, in a case like this, WP:SYNTH probably applies, which means, basically, that our analysis doesn't cut it, we need to find a source that agrees with us.  (Possibly look for law review articles)  Montanabw(talk) 07:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Every single source cites 109 (I have reviewed over 20 sources - all repeat the same incorrect number). The few that cite the number of laws, cite 14. I'll keep looking, but in the mean time, as I am doubtful that anything will be found, wouldn't it be more accurate to say more than a hundred instead of 109 which is clearly wrong? The article uses that number twice. SusunW (talk) 08:01, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of tribes/bands terminated? 

message: Not sure where to go with him. On the one hand, I am tempted to give a brief overview of the various "terminationist" congressmen here and then flesh out their personal pages with a section on termination. But, is that appropriate for Watkins, as he was the main proponent? 
In any case, how does one avoid that his motivation for much of what drove his policy was his faith? https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=8lvBQBOP3icC&lpg=PA7&ots=JnYVULxNvP&dq=racism%20and%20indian%20termination&pg=PA37#v=onepage&q=racism%20and%20indian%20termination&f=false p 30 - 37 and http://content.lib.utah.edu/utils/getfile/collection/USHSArchPub/id/6870/filename/6905.pdf are just two of multiple examples. 
Finally, the unattributed quote, I can find no where. I think it needs to be eliminated, if we cannot document its source. SusunW (talk) 05:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely toss what can't be sourced.  If there were other editors, you could slap on the "citation needed" tag for a few days to see if anyone jumps in, but given this article seems abandoned, I'd just toss it.  If anyone cares, they can revert and restore. Then you can discuss  (see WP:BRD for how this works).  Montanabw(talk) 07:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Arthur V. Watkins

message: Hi SusunW.  I'd say that until someone comes along to help, I'd start making careful edits along the lines you suggest, sourcing as you go.  You could also sandbox sections and lay with them until they are ready for prime time.  Montanabw(talk) 07:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article improvement

message: The article is extremely impressive in its thoroughness and scope. But it has one problem which is that it is very unwieldy in size and layout. I think ideally this should be broken into a series of articles and this article should simply be a summary of those. So I think the best thing to do would be to spin off some of the heaviest sections to form daughter articles, and then find a way to keep this article as a general overview of the topic of Indian termination, relegating the detailed information to the daughter articles. I think the most important part of this article is to give a coherent overview of the history of the topic, from the beginning to the end, written in a way that lets the reader understand why the policy was adopted, what its consequences was and why it was abandoned. This is all in the article already, but it is located in different parts, separated by long lists of tribes and legislation that is probably not useful or interesting to most readers. This detailed information, including the veeeery long tables, is what I would spin off into daughter articles. This is my suggestion, for how o structure the information which you can take or leave as you like - though it would seem to be in keeping with our MOS and general guidelines (see e.g. Summary style and Article size. As I say the amount of information and detail is truly impressive and your work is top notch, but at this point I think the presentation of the information in a way that makes it accessible should be the focus. All the best.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 21:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: that is kind of what I thought. You will see that I have linked to main pages and done a short overview with some of the topics. Those are mainly ones I found articles on, or that I wrote. I am not really sure how to "move" sections to pages, but will try it and see how it goes. Yes, it is monstrosity of a file and the tables are long, but I thought the easiest way to present the information, as a list, would just have made the file even bigger. SusunW (talk) 00:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You can create the new daughter pages by simply making a redlink e.g. Indian Termination policy in Alaska, and then go to the link and copy paste the content in. The tables are fine (better than bare lists I think), but they break up the reading flow of the page somewhat brutally so they may be better to include in smaller detail oriented articles, or in list articles, such as e.g. List of Indian Terminations in Oregon or something like that. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

text: okay, if I did this right, there is now a page for The Western Oregon Indian Termination Act. SusunW (talk) 04:55, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You did, you'll feel confident doing this soon. :) User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 04:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions from Maunus

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Indian termination policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080907132246/http://litsite.alaska.edu/aktraditions/ancsa.html to http://litsite.alaska.edu/aktraditions/ancsa.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Indian termination policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121022134948/http://www.epa.gov/indian/pdfs/reagan83.pdf to http://www.epa.gov/indian/pdfs/reagan83.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Indian termination policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070608052514/http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu:80/native_voices/voices_display.cfm?id=96 to http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/native_voices/voices_display.cfm?id=96
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070608052514/http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu:80/native_voices/voices_display.cfm?id=96 to http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/native_voices/voices_display.cfm?id=96
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Indian termination policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303215600/http://digital.library.okstate.edu/kappler/Vol6/html_files/v6p1104b.html to http://digital.library.okstate.edu/kappler/Vol6/html_files/v6p1104b.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120123135051/http://digital.library.okstate.edu:80/kappler/vol6/html_files/v6p0882.html to http://digital.library.okstate.edu/kappler/Vol6/html_files/v6p0882.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150321002925/http://www.klamathtribes.org:80/background/termination.html to http://www.klamathtribes.org/background/termination.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Indian termination policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://digital.library.okstate.edu/kappler/vol6/html_files/v6p0882.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.klamathtribes.org/background/termination.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120723100357/http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/juris/j1762_01.sgml to https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/juris/j1762_01.sgml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120723100357/http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/juris/j1762_01.sgml to https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/juris/j1762_01.sgml
*Added  tag to http://www.ledger-dispatch.com/news/a-look-at-buena-vista-an-th83-8212-guest-commentary-by-butch-cranfordp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indian termination policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219081421/http://jacksoncountyjournal.com/potawatomi-historical-timeline-p292-156.htm to http://jacksoncountyjournal.com/potawatomi-historical-timeline-p292-156.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Indian termination policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927015243/http://www.nrcprograms.org/site/PageServer?pagename=cin_hist_terminationpolicy to http://www.nrcprograms.org/site/PageServer?pagename=cin_hist_terminationpolicy
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927015243/http://www.nrcprograms.org/site/PageServer?pagename=cin_hist_terminationpolicy to http://www.nrcprograms.org/site/PageServer?pagename=cin_hist_terminationpolicy
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141216082057/http://www.oneidaindiannation.com/about/sovereignty/26287694.html to http://www.oneidaindiannation.com/about/sovereignty/26287694.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070409153255/http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/5views/5views1f.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/5views/5views1f.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.pbpindiantribe.com/tribal-history.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080401073426/http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=391&invol=404 to http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=391&invol=404
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160119131158/https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/opinions/47mattox/op/1983/htm/jm0017.htm to https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/opinions/47mattox/op/1983/htm/jm0017.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141227053848/http://history.rutgers.edu/honors-papers-2009/148-federal-termination-and-its-effects/file to http://history.rutgers.edu/honors-papers-2009/148-federal-termination-and-its-effects/file
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified