lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neal Adams

message: I just reverted an edit (diff) that added Adams to Jewish artist categories because I could not find any reliable sources indicating the he is Jewish. I then noticed in the article the statement "He is Jewish", citing an article in Vulture. Are there other reliable sources supporting the statement that he is Jewish? I did not find any with a Google search, but that doesn't mean they don't exist. Thanks!   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.) 18:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: don't worry i got a link, https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-ab&q=neal+adams+jewish  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.122.10.206 (talk) 18:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read several of the articles/posts on the results page of that search and none of them state that Neal Adams is Jewish. It would seem that if he is Jewish, that fact would have been mentioned in those articles/posts.   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.) 16:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  He is Jewish! Read this:  Riesman, Abraham (April 17, 2018)."Green Lantern No. 76 Was the Moment Superhero Comics Got Woke". Vulture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8004:2740:761C:CCA9:6C7D:5FD7:7143 (talk) 08:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  JPost says "Adams, who was born in 1941, was not Jewish, but had a strong interest in the Holocaust because of his childhood in Germany and his mother-in-law being a Jewish refugee from Nazi-occupied Poland." --Omnipaedista (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In an Comic Book Artist interview, published by TwoMorrows, Adams relates that he had grown up Catholic while discussing some of his work for National Lampoon in the early 1970s. 24.246.125.95 (talk) 16:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Neal Adams Jewish? 

message: The people on the disambiguation page are not similar enough or notable enough for inclusion here. 2601:182:4381:E60:34C9:E1A9:5CE7:8B6E (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Hammiradeva

message: ImpuMozhi,
Why did you put CSD notice on this article?  This article which will be expanded soon contains the history about an Indian monarch and his battles with khilji.  This material is not very well known and has been put after researching multiple books and websites.  Please explain your position.
Shivraj Singh 05:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Beatriz Marinello

message: The convicted felon Sam Sloan is the notoriously unreliable author of this article.  Billbrock 05:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough to ask for more specificity.  Sloan is correct that my animus is personal.  It's a tricky balance: the article is patently unfair for the following reasons, but I should not be the one making any changes....
*her first act as president was to fire Tom Brownscombe who had replaced her as scholastic coordinator, along with 16 other members of the USCF staff
The bias in the characterization is apparent.  USCF was on the brink of bankruptcy....Billbrock 01:31, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Congratulations on your victory.  Now kindly edit the article to achieve NPOV, addressing the issues raised above.  Other than restoring the tag, I shall refrain from an edit war.  Let others decide when NPOV has been achieved.  Billbrock 00:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Dispute
Talk:Edward Norton Lorenz

message: When was he born? Is he still alive?
:The DOB is in the article (MON DD, 1917). Yes, he is alive. He comes into his office nearly every day (I am a graduate student in the Green Building, where he works. Nationalparks 06:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: his work unique? differential equations say same thing and that is not new  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.191.14 (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: DOB

message: Reorganized this page, but not to exclude or verify the previous data, or include new data. Removed date (but not year) of birth for privacy. Included some internal links. Removed Cleanup and Wikify tags.
--Gouveia2 19:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ReOrg

message: I would like to add more on the significance of his work but remain unsure if it would be best added to his bio page or that for the Lorenz attractor. Maybe I'll work both with more technical info on the other page. The thing is, its not too technical but still might enhance the attractor page. Just thought I'd say. Questions/Answers? --Kenneth M Burke 23:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Research

message: Edward Norton Lorenz conquered Chaos...RIP--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 03:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RIP

message: with Konrad Lorenz, zoologist and Nobel prize winner! --80.30.222.252 (talk) 16:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not to be confused either...
Talk:Yehuda Krinsky

message: He is NOT the father of Sholom Ber Krinsky of Vilnius, Lithuania.
Is there a different high-ranking Yehuda Krinsky in Chabad, then? It's certainly possible. My apologies if I was mistaken.ShalomShlomo 10:22, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no need to make deals. The information is incorrect, hence its removal. This applies whether or not his organizational role has been clarified. Daykart 18:28, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I have been misinterpreted. I had no problem removing the incorrect information, and, as you'll note, later did. I was simply saying that I didn't have the knowledge to cogently make the other edit the poster mentioned was necessary, and was suggesting they do so. Sorry for the confusion. ShalomShlomo 02:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's okay. Interesting, three of the posters on this page have the same name. My name is "Sholom" in real life. Daykart 04:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comments
Talk:Port-Royal National Historic Site

message: St.Johns settled in 1497? I'm not so sure. Yes Cabotto probably discovered Newfoundland in  1497 but he didnt found a colony.
I am not sure why the information on Port Royal after the habitation was put with this wiki article. I thought the location of port royal following the habitation was the site of present-day Annapolis Royal.  Given this is a different location, I think the history of the "second" port royal should be put on the Port Royal, Annapolis County website to avoid confusion.  Comments?--Hantsheroes (talk) 17:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Talk:James Morasco

message: Shouldn't this be merged with Toynbee tiles?  I mean, is there anything notable about Mr. Morasco besides him being the possible creator of the tiles?--Pharos 05:39, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. -- Securiger 22:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree Not my leg 18:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree; no proof.  Article nominated for quick deletion --subliminalis 07:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. Though there is no proof that he had anything to do with the tiles, he is strongly associated with them and should not be deleted (much as anything written about bombs at the Atlanta Olympics would have to mention the guy who was wrongly accused). It should be merged, though, as I can see no conceivable reason anyone would be looking for Morasco here other than his purported connection to the tiles. Mdbrownmsw 17:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: This is a vanity artilcle and should be deleted.  No proof exists of Mr. Morasco's involvement with the toynbee tiles. --subliminalis 07:08, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Vanity" articles are written about one's self or one's associates. I wrote this article, and I have no connection whatsoever with James Morasco. I wrote it to serve as an aid for other writers or researchers who may wish to further explore the possible connection between Morasco and the Toynbee tiles. It provides some basic data, and the data is sourced. Morasco's statement to the Philadelphia Inquirer suggests he had some connection with the tiles. — Walloon 07:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon a second reading, I see this person was recognized by reputed sources.  I apologize for my hasty decision to delete this article.--subliminalis 08:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DB-BIO
Talk:Symbolic computation of matrix eigenvalues

message: Agree. Everything should be in one place.
I second Fresheneesz 19:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that this should be merged somewhere - either the algorithm page or the eigenvalue page. Haonhien 16:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Eigenvalue algorithm]]
Talk:Coins of the Rhodesian dollar

message: What happened to the threepence?  This article states that the halfpenny and penny were removed, while the sixpence, shilling, florin, and half-crown remained in circulation.  Did the threepence also remain in circulation, being equal to the 2½ cent coin? Nik42 23:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Auburndale, Massachusetts

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If you would like comments for improvement, just come and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 15:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ribonuclease H

message: User:129.43.6.74 says, " SORRY THAT IS INCONSISTENT! EITHER 3' or 5' phosphate but not both!!!!"  JedOs   06:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

message: So which is it? 3 prime hydroxyl as mentioned in first sentence or 3 prime phosphate as mentioned in sentence prior to this one? [This question from 24.150.167.4 was placed at the end of the first paragraph of the article 04:43, November 19, 2006. I've simply relocated it to this talk page. Keesiewonder 12:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a section mechanism but no information is given. the illustration alone does not explain what is happening. 92.78.252.188 (talk) 17:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the mechanism?
Talk:Vittskövle Church

message: does anyone know what a grave choir is?  some a capella singers sitting in a ditch?  ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 06:32, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What is referred to is the architectural part of the church where a family tomb or mausoleum is. My dictionary translated "gravkor" as chapel, but I think I can not just replace the word. The sentence has to be rephrased. / Habj 10:31, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The german term seems to be "Grabchor" (singular) and "Grabchöre" (plural). If that is of any help. I don't think "grave chapel" is correct. --Stighammar (talk) 03:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

text: And then:  "In the choir, the legend of Saint Nicholas has been depicted." - I am still unsure what is meant by "the choir".  ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 12:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is probably a poor translation from Swedish "kor". My dictionary says: "kor: chancel, presbytery, (the place of the altar) sanctuary". I am not sure which word is the best, but I exchanged "kor" for "chancel". / Habj 10:31, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Kababir

message: In 1931 they built the first mosque on Mount Carmel, named probably after the  Kabris plant. In the 1980s they completed a larger grand mosque with two white minaretes standing 34 meters tall, which dominate the low-rise skyline of the residential neighbourhoods on the ridges nearby.
The above is a quote from the article as it was before my edit. I've removed the "probably named after the Kabris plant" phrase, since it doesn't seem to have any relation to the rest of the paragraph. What was; the mosque, or the hill? If the hill, how does "Carmel" relate to "Kabris"? Some details are needed before this can be mentioned in the article. // Pathoschild 06:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Kabris plant
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Neo-Creationism

message: As far as the claim made by Endomion that neo-creationism is a variation of scientific creationism (aka creation science), it is clear that the two are distinct and mutually exclusive concepts and groups, each with their own well-defined literature, terms and neologisms, and intellectual boundaries. Those boundaries are drawn around the acceptance of scripture as a foundation for their respective claims and whether validating scripture as fact through science is a primary a goal. The prime example of a neo-creationist concept is intelligent design; the idea that an unidentified designer is responsible for existence of life. A typical neo-creationist group is the Discovery Institute. Contrast that to a typical example of a creation science concept, Flood geology. It's the idea that geological formations were created by the global flood described in the story of Noah's ark, and seeks to prove the biblical account as factual through the use of science. Even the names of the leading creation science groups, Answers in Genesis and Institute for Creation Research, betray a very different perspective than that of neo-creationists.
:*From Scientific creationism: "Creation science is the effort to provide scientific evidence supporting the account of the creation of the universe related in the Bible."
:*From Neo-Creationism: "Neo-Creationism is a movement whose goal is to restate creationism in terms more likely to be well-received by the public, policy makers, educators, and the scientific community. It aims to re-frame the debate over the origins of life in non-religious terms and without appeals to scripture."
Clearly the two are diametrically opposed in their view on scripture, a topic central to creationism, and neither would be well-served by a merge. There are literally hundreds of statements from either side of the creationism aisle that recognize the distinction between the two movements/groups, not to mention the those from critics and neutral observers. All see neo-creationism as a clear and distinct movement from creation science/scientific creationism for the former's embracing of scripture and the latter's eschewing of it in favor of posing as mainstream science. Merging two creationism articles when one is philosophically opposed to the other doesn't make much sense. FeloniousMonk 07:04, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: On merging with [[Creation science]] (aka 'scientific creationism')
Talk:Yves Engler

message: I consider this page to be a vanity page and I am recommending it for deletion. Knave75 07:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He is quoted elsewhere in the Wikipedia.  Perhaps those quotes should get yanked, but nevertheless, I would have had more difficulty in determining how to weigh the value of his commentary without this article. —BozoTheScary 23:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Message

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 19:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: My edits keep getting reverted by what seems to be a biased user. I would try to take the relevant comments into account (some ignore other details), but I suspect he will revert anyway and I'm not interested in an edit war. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=869795642&oldid=869749826&title=Yves_Engler — Punkyboy (talk) 19:39, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:ResEdit

message: So sad....that ResEdit will soon die out :(
I still have my old PowerBook G3 kicking around (OS 9.2.2) to run ResEdit :)
nneonneo 07:20, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The http://www.resexcellence.com/ links seem to be dead as of 11/5/06.
FlashSheridan 20:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  resexcellence dead links 

message: http://www.resedit.net Sxilderik (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ResEdit is also a free Windows resource editor... 

message: The links to ftp.appe.com are dead.  I changed them to http://mirrors.vanadac.com/ftp.apple.com [...], as of 12/3/2011 216.9.142.231 (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  apple links mirror
Talk:Cartesian materialism

message: This article could desperately use an illustration of "a homunculus in a Cartesian theater":
*A little tiny person that lives inside a human head.
*The little tiny person is sitting in a movie theater (which is also inside the human head).
*The movie theater screen is showing a picture of whatever the human being's eyes are seeing. 
If anyone could draw this, it would greatly help out this article, because it could convey in five seconds the "gist" of what a "cartesian theater" is.  This is a true example of where a good picture would really be worth a thousand words.-Alecmconroy 15:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And it looks nice. Al 18:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Illustration
Talk:Cardiac sonographer

message: I'm against a merger of Echocardiology and Echocardiography:
#Echocardiography describes the art and science of excamining the heart by ultrasound. The article of echocardiology describes one of several professions who performs echocardiography.
#Echocardiology (shouldn't it be echocardiologist?) is a seldom used term. (Echocardiographic) sonographer or echo-tech (slightly condecending) is more common
# The article about echocardiology is valid only in the USA (and perhaps Canada?). An article about sonographers in diferent countries would be interesting though.
--Ekko 07:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure. I think echocardiography can mention which type of professionals perform echos. This page has its own merit if it contains a description of the training, professional organisations etc. But most echocardiographers also perform other cardiovascular investigations. JFW | T@lk 12:17, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, this is (probably) true only in certain parts of the world (north America). I still think a separate article on personell would be best, since this is a complex issue. --Ekko 07:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Sure, as long as some content peculiar to that topic can be inserted. JFW | T@lk 09:41, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan

message: Is this article Kurdistan Democratic Party (Iran) about the same party? Amqui (talk) 04:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same article? 
Talk:Phase angle (vectors, phasors, and periodic phenomena)

message: How about a picture or diagram?— Preceding unsigned comment added by  Jamesalex  (talk • contribs) 06:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The article says:
:The phase angle of a point on a periodic wave is the distance between the point and a specified reference point, expressed using an angular measure. 
and
:For example, in electrical engineering, sinusoidal voltage and current can be expressed as a sine function with a magnitude such as:
::
v(t) = V_m \cos( \omega t + \varphi ) \;
:Where \varphi is the phase angle, 
How do I reconcile those two statements?  What is the "reference point"?  And what is "the point"?  Usually the reference point is t=0, and "the point" is t.  The angle at t=0 is \varphi, and at t is \omega t + \varphi, so the distance between them is just \omega t, which does not depend on \varphi!
Furthermore, the article says:
:This angular measure is obtained by projecting a rotating vector onto the real axis of the complex plane.
Using the same example, the projection on the real axis is the voltage v, not \varphi.
--Bob K 18:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  it's nonsense
Talk:Catuvellauni

message: I have changed the map image from the  to a .  
The reason for this change is to allow users to more easily visualise the extent of the tribal territory in the context of the modern county boundaries.  
Although the old map showed the relation to some of the bordering tribes - it did not show all of them.  The text of the article has also been revised to give links to all of the neighbouring tribes. Their extent in relation to the Catuvellauni can be seen by following those links.   Josephus (talk) 03:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Map of Tribal Area
Talk:Michael Klim

message: Doe anyone know?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.167.230 (talk) 08:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is he bald? 

message: This page reads more like a news article about his career rather than an encyclopaedic article. 007bond aka Matthew G aka codingmasters 05:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  news article 

message: According to the Foo article, he is on the cover of the album (wearing the temporary FF tattoo).
Should there be mention of this?  I think it's pretty significant, anyone else agree?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.96.186 (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foo? 
Talk:Ecgfrith of Northumbria

message: I notice a few references to his defeat at the Battle Of Dunnichen as "disastrous".  Does this fit with the neutral point of view that wikipedia entires should adhere to?  Disastrous from Ecgfrith's point of view, certainly, but not from all perspectives. Lianachan 08:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, yes, it certainly wasn't disastrous from the POV of the Picts. But I think the wording/context makes it fairly clear that it means disastrous in terms of Northumbrian power...if you can think of a way to improve the wording to make it more clear, feel free. Everyking 08:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm considering an extensive edit for the Battle Of Dunnichen (in here as the Battle Of Nechtansmere) in my sandbox, with considerably more information about the circumstances before and after the battle (as well as the battle itself).  Subject to peer review, my concerns with this entry would be addressed for anybody who links to Dunnichen. Lianachan 09:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. Everyking 09:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Barabra

message: The 1911 info is really not helpful here; the state of ethnolinguistic and anthropological knowledge of this part of the world was very poor then, compared to today, and this means that articles on subjects like this are not really reliable or verifiable. — mark ✎ 08:47, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This was an orphaned page. I looked at it out of curiosity, made a few spelling/link updates and basically wanted to see whether anyone noticed/cared. There appear to be much better pages on the same subject. Should the page have been removed a long time ago? Probably, and now it is not "orphaned". (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Lonelypages&limit=250&offset=0 ) #249 (Stormbay 22:35, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've pruned the outdated racial-ethnographical ramblings. The article still needs more recent sources. — mark ✎ 09:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Sammi Cheng

message: Not a single picture of her, ffs, really?!?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.145.113.18 (talk) 15:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: picture

message: The cover song and singles section are moving to the Sammi Cheng discography.  That page was created due to the long list of albums.  The cover song and singles are not more notable than the albums, and make the article size just as long. Benjwong (talk) 03:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover song and singles