lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Security engineering

message: Who can explain why Security engineering is Social sciences? There is about International security, isn't? So why? It's more technical than social--Albedo @ 18:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree. This category would be better named as 'Security technology' as the notion of 'engineering' relates much more to design and evaluation processes. It would thus be a subcat of both Security and Technology and would related to technical measures/devices only.--Hooperbloob (talk) 13:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Tana Qirqos

message: Does anyone know thre exact geographic coordinates please  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.97.217.69 (talk) 10:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Menilik legend is a Christina Invention.  The Jews of Ethiopia, where there first, tell show it came from the Elephantine Island.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.29.233.157 (talk) 15:55, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Abuna Theophilos

message: : The main part of the article is taken from this sources and it looked like being copied and pasted without any perephrasing done. The links are the following: </br> https://www.ethiogrio.com/biography/3447-abuna-theophilos.html </br>https://m.facebook.com/addisalemmariam/posts/1636690326643028 Lyupant (talk) 12:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and links used
Talk:Kittenz and Thee Glitz

message: Do I even need to say it? This reads like it was written by Felix's biggest fan. It's not neutral, is confusing, and contains no references. - Zepheus <ゼィフィアス> 01:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't that serious - fixed in 5 mins.. Secretlondon 20:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Yeha

message: From the article: 
: Yeha is also a common misspelling of the word "yeah" when typing fast in instant messenging clients (i.e. AIM, ICQ, MSN Messenger, or Yahoo Messenger).
Do we really need to include information about a common typo in Wikipedia? I'm not even sure this would qualify as something that should be kept on Wikitionary. -- llywrch 23:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Calling Yeha south Arabian when no such structure predates any found in south Arabia is a farce 2A02:C7C:36FF:3600:886A:A431:DFB9:95E2 (talk) 00:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeha
Talk:Yabelo

message: How can Yabelo be the administrative centre of Guji Zone, when Yabelo Wereda remained in Borena Zone, and is some considerable distance from the boundary between the two zones?  Skinsmoke (talk) 21:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved.  Text was wrong per citation already given.  Now corrected.  Skinsmoke (talk) 21:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Administrative Centre
Talk:Dessie

message: Ue3lman why changing it to a town? There are many sources that says it's a city. Population is well over 100.000. It's also the capital city of South Wollo zone. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Population does NOT equal city status as a place with little as 25,000 people can still be a city in countries around the world. The reason I changed it to town is that's what most sources call it. Also, the CSA (a government agency) calls it 'Dessie town'. Ue3lman (talk) 00:44, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why from city to town? 
Talk:High-test peroxide

message: Quote: "when thousands of civilians were safely killed"
I can appreciate the black humour, but many will be offended, and it is not very suitable for an encyclopedia. Should be changed, right? --GunnsteinLye 18:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Safely killed?

message: H2O2 also reacts violently to organic matter. Any tissue will cause it to violently decompose, like when you put the 3% stuff on your cuts as a kid, except about 30 times worse. I reccomend adding this in, but if it is not in a week, I will -Hairchrm 01:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't react instantly though. If you're quickly sprayed with water, no harm necessarily results; although you'll be snow-white for a day or two.WolfKeeper 06:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Organic Matter

message: Apart from the couple of lines about the Russian torpedos, this article is completely duplicated in the "Use as propellant" section in Hydrogen peroxide. Does this article need to stand on its own? Silverchemist 12:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose - We have an article on RP-1. Maybe we should split the Hydrogen Peroxide article and enlarge this one instead. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 08:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge - I don't see how that article somehow warrants the existence of this one that only discusses a specific strength of the substance. Absolutely this does not deserve to exist. --84.250.188.136 (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Oppose - as per GW Simulations. Hydrogen peroxide is an article on the chemistry, High test peroxide on one engineering application. The subjects are significantly different.  If anything, we should do some cut & paste editing to move the right content to the right places. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Merge - Pretty much the entirety of this article also exists in the hydrogen peroxide article, this article simply doesn't have any additional info that warrants its existence as a standalone article. Further while I do feel that the RP-1 article is similar to Kerosene, it is also different enough that it much better warrants its existence as an article. I do not feel that the subjects in this article are different enough to not have it all in the main peroxide article.82.176.205.54 (talk) 11:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Hydrogen Peroxide]]

message: What kind of percentage (mass percentage or mole percentage) is used the description of the highly concentrated solution? The present version of the article does not specify!--5.2.200.163 (talk) 16:04, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in there under "Properties". The concentration varies, but HTP is any peroxide over the "proof" level. This is the concentration (by mass) of about 66-67% whereupon the peroxide has sufficient excess energy to fully vapourise itself, on reaction. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kind of percentage
Talk:Reni, Ukraine

message: port of Reni is the biggest one on Danube river
: do we have a source for that? Anonimu 18:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NBA on television

message: To whoever added the American Idol tidbit: in my opinion, it is incorrect to add in tidbits from reality shows to a page discussing Nielsen ratings for a sports program. Scripted and reality programs unequivocably get higher ratings than sporting events--therefore, if you are to add in the idea that American Idol gets higher ratings than the NBA, you would have to add in just about every other show on network in primetime (CSI, Survivor, etc) as well and add them in relation to every other sport. If you are the same person who added the American Idol portion to the NBA on TNT page, I ask that you see my explanation on that page as well. Paulsen 18:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To take some of the clutter out of the article, I plan to move the tables to either a separate article or a separate part of the page.Phillip J. Fry 02:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I'm thinking about re-naming this article. We should take the word "Nielsen" out of the title and have the word "television" in the title. This would make it a more intuitive title, and would make the article easier to find. A couple of options are:
* National Basketball Association television ratings — see, for example Stanley Cup Finals television ratings or World Series television ratings; or
* National Basketball Association on television — see, for example National Football League on television, or Major League Soccer on television.
Thoughts? Barryjjoyce (talk) 18:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-name?
Talk:A-10 Cuba!

message: I got a version of this game that comes with demos of Time Commando, Hyper Blade, Zork Nemesis and Muppets Treasure Island. But, this article doesn't say that.--Youtuber Mangoman34:-D (talk) 15:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A version of the game 
Talk:The Lesbian and Gay Foundation

message: I have removed the references to trained counsellors on the helpline as it is not the case that the LGF trains helpline operators to be counsellors.  --manchesterstudent 18:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have changed the date of the merger from 'late 1990s' to April 2000 as stated on the lgf website here --manchesterstudent 19:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Merger
Talk:2001 NBA Finals

message: Picture description page explanation: The logo was from NBA.com; the official logo was the one on the court. Paulsen 19:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo
Talk:Active NBA non-playoff appearance streaks

message: This page will next be updated immediately after 14 total teams are each officially elimated from 2007 NBA playoff contention (c. mid-April 2007).
Since when does a singularity, ie. 1, indicate a streak? Doesn't make any sense to me to include teams that miss on a "one-off" occasion.202.139.104.226 (talk) 23:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The current intro is "The following is a list of NBA teams with the longest active non-playoff appearance streaks."
For those not into basketball, it is very confusing. Is it a list of teams who did not appear in the NBA playoffs for the last years?  Or teams that appeared in the non-playoff (whatever that may be?).
Don't answer my question here; just put it in the introduction of the article. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 09:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some introduction is needed
Talk:Better Than Chocolate

message: His portrayal of Judy is thought by myself and my friends to be one of the very best portrayals of a transwoman in all of filmdom. ShannonLikeHoney (talk) 16:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   Peter Outerbridge as Judy 
Talk:Arthur Widmer

message: I corrected the claim that bluescreening is used today on television, because Widmer's process is an optical one whereas the technique used on television is an electronic one named "color keying" or "chroma keying". Matzeachmann 22:27, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Used today on television
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Iloveminun

message: This editor's abuses are so serious in my opinion that I have proposed a community ban.  --Tony Sidaway 09:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed community ban

message: The motion for a community ban having failed, the next step is Arbitration.  The application is here. --Tony Sidaway 12:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitration

message: It may be too late to say this, because it is time for arbitration. However, if I can still have a voice in this, I think there should be a compromise. The sockpuppetry and other offenses of Minun/Iloveminun are ridiculous, but xe's been a great good-faith contributor lately. I say that one final warning should be given. Offenses beyond that will result in bans (enforced by blocks if necessary), and permanent blocking of sockpuppets. --Gray Porpoise 15:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion
Talk:Active Major League Baseball postseason appearance streaks

message: First of all, why is there THIS MUCH CRAP in the Talk section?  Breaking down consecutive-wins seasons down to the difference between 80, 81, and 82 or more wins is a) hardly notable to anyone other than the most statistics-obsessed baseball nut, and b) irrelevant to the actual topic - namely, Postseason Appearance Streaks!
Second, how come there's no section for all-time postseason streaks?  The Atlanta Braves' 14-season streak (all division championships) and the New York Yankees' 12-season streak under Joe Torre are certainly notable, especially given that it was harder to maintain postseason streaks prior to divisional play.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.29.144.224 (talk) 00:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  All-Time Postseason Streaks?
Talk:Green Party (Czech Republic)

message: So why is this considered automatically a party of the center-right coalition, rather than the center-left? Septentrionalis 19:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the Czech Greens are fairly centrist, rather to the right; what's the big surprise about that? —Nightstallion (?) 20:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Somewhat right, then, of several other Green parties. Not surprising; but a statement, and (if possible) a third-party analysis would be helpful for non-Czechs. Septentrionalis 22:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wikipedia itself defines this term as refusing to engage in elections, but assuming we adopt for this page the more literal definition of "outside Parliament", "not represented", it's incorrect to describe the Greens as extraparliamentary (in the section on the Chamber of Deputies) - since they have a Senate seat, and the Senate too is part of Parliament. Perhaps then a better term would be "extracameral", i.e. not represented in the Chamber of Deputies. 86.181.21.129 (talk) 19:31, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraparliamentary
Talk:Clarke Ingram

message: Clarke's biography is well-known within the radio broadcast industry, but here are a few places to look:
* 440Satisfaction, a recognized radio personality database (scroll down for his resume)
* Google search that shows many articles about Clarke's association with the stations listed
* Wikipedia entry on DuMont Television Network, which references Clarke's site
MPWard 19:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arboretum

message: I'm proposing to merge Pinetum into this article because it's just a definition and a "pinetum" isn't any different from an "arboretum" except that it has conifers, so there isn't much info to add to the pinetum article. SCHZMO ✍ 19:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree. Some pinetums are already mentioned on the arboretum page. - MPF 21:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For readers: this merge seems to have now been carried out.  --Drake Wilson 07:03, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Pinetum]] into this page 

message: There are a fair few now so it seems a good idea to group these by continent. If no one has any objection I'll do that in a few days. PRL42 (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Now completed. PRL42 (talk) 09:26, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group 'later examples' by continent 

message: Which examples are being chosen for this article? --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there is any particular criterion. I suppose that if people keep adding more then at some point we would need to consider some way to limit the number before someone points us to "WP:WikiIsNotAnArboretumGuide". PRL42 (talk) 14:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which examples? 
Talk:British Pacific Fleet

message: And by this title I don't mean the US Pacific Squadron, but hte pre-WWII British fleet in the Pacific, more properly the one home-based at Esquimalt, British Columbia and its RN shipyard; see Esquimalt Royal Navy Dockyard and Talk:Esquimalt Royal Navy Dockyard and Talk:Pacific Squadron.  Just looking for corroboration on tne RN "Pacific Squadron" usage and waht the official name of that fleet/contingent was, and it needs its own article; most of its member-vessels are already listed on List of Royal Navy ships in the Pacific Northwest, and note the unofficial cutoff date for that page is, more or less, 1905 (when the RN base and shipyard became CFB EsquimaltSkookum1 06:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's now an article at Pacific Station. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Pacific Squadron]] vs BPF

message: Is there a reference for: "The British Pacific Fleet was, and remains, the most powerful conventional fleet assembled by the Royal Navy. By VJ Day it had four battleships, eighteen aircraft carriers, eleven cruisers and many smaller warships and support vessels"?
I'm trying to think of better wording here, as the above is misleading:
* There were 4 battleships and only 6 full-sized fleet carriers; plus 4 light-carriers, 2 maintenance carriers, and 9 escort carriers.
* Compare this to the Grand Fleet at Jutland, which had 37 battleships and battlecruisers and 34 cruisers. Obviously the Grand Fleet had no aircraft carriers, and you might debate who would win in a mythical head-to-head battle between the Grand Fleet and the BPF, but I think the paragraph should be reworded.
* Also the count of aircraft carriers is listed as 17, 18, and 19 at various points in the article (perhaps a result of the complexity of counting lots of different kinds of aircraft carrier as one type). Dave w74 (talk) 00:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The most powerful conventional fleet"? 

message: What ref is there for the BPF being at Iwo Jima? 94.5.160.110 (talk) 23:05, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iwo Jima 

message: 'Shortly before VJ-Day the squadron was involved in attacks against the Japanese mainland near Tokyo, two aircraft being lost but the aircrew rescued by a US submarine'
This piece of text is opposite both 1842 & 1846 squadrons in the table. It seems unlikely that this happened to two squadrons in what must have been a very short time. 
Is this just accidental duplication? Dean1954 (talk) 14:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused entries in table?
Talk:Education in Greece/to do

message: This article was basically a bulleted outline and has seen only modest improvement in the last few days.  Much of the information was outdated.  Proposals for further imporovement are listed below: 
*Merge vocational section into Secondary & Tertiary sections; start new articles where appropriate.
*Think about moving IEK to a new namespace: most Wikipedia articles have a full title and do not employ an abbreviation.
*Destub the Primary & Secondary sections.
*Updated information on the status of private schools - especially universities - and degree recognition, and the political situation regarding other education reforms.
*Discussion of Greek education in the context of EU reforms.
*Brief discussion of the history of education in Greece proper, the Hellenistic world & the modern Greek-speaking diaspora.
*The role of the Greek Church in shaping educational policy.
*Information about how teachers are employed in Greece (i.e. by Ministry of Education, not directly by the schools). I understand teachers in Greece have the status of Civil Servants.
Please add additional tasks above. --Jpbrenna 19:23, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Wicked Tinkers

message: I've moved all of the member bio's onto seperate pages, but the albums really need to be on their own pages so that the track lists don't crowd the page. NeoVampTrunks 19:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

message: This article currently reads like a press release. More information is needed, e.g. is this band actually Scottish/Irish, or is it a "faux-Celtic" American outfit? 217.155.20.163 21:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info? 

message: A discussion a few months ago Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_19#Wicked_Tinkers_and_related_articles resulted in a suggestion of merging all the Wicked Tinkers-related articles until more sources are found. --Ronz (talk) 20:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Has horn player Jay Atwood been replaced by CJ?--CurtisSwain (talk) 06:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change in members? 

message: On an episode of the latest incarnation of "The Gong Show" , as of this posting , broadcast twice: The Wicked Tinkers appeared playing "Come On Eileen". They scored a perfect 30 points , but , tied with a Man & Girl clog dancing team (!) , whom the judges awarded the trophy to instead. 75.104.163.77 (talk) 05:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2017 Gong Show Ringers!
Talk:SMS Gneisenau

message: Here a transcription of User:Parsecboy's messages in my talk page:
*Hello Keysanger. Please stop adding the "continental" bit to the  article. No one would reasonably think "the coast of Chile" refers to Easter Island; it would be like assuming that "the east coast of the United States" might somehow refer to Puerto Rico. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 11:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase "coast of Chile" unambiguously refers to the mainland. If Easter Island was the intended location, one would say "the coast of Easter Island". When referring to a state, the mainland (as opposed to outlying territories) is assumed to be the subject. "Continental" is needless verbage and should not clutter up the prose. Parsecboy (talk) 13:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Note, I have posted this request for wider input. Parsecboy (talk) 14:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since we have just been reading about Easter Island, the qualifier continental is justified. Dankarl (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: How is "After a week off Easter Island, the ships departed for Chile." possibly ambiguous? Do you honestly think anyone would think this means the ships left Easter Island and...headed to Easter Island"? Parsecboy (talk) 14:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that most readers aren't going to know that Chile owns Easter Island, I see no need to add "continental".--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:22, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding "continental" in this context is poor writing. While I don't think you need to qualify coast, "mainland" would be much preferred to "continental". —Diiscool (talk) 16:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

text: Whether or not "After a week off Easter Island, the ships departed for Chile" is ambiguous is a moot point, but I find it positively misleading as it strongly implies that Easter Island and Chile are different countries.  Given that, as Sturmvogel says, most (or at least many) readers don't know of the territorial connection, a qualifier assists understanding. In English, like Diiscool, I much prefer "mainland" ("continental" sounds like a translation from Spanish) - "the Chilean mainland" would be my preference. Davidships (talk) 21:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gneisenau, Chile, etc.
Talk:Dark Sun: Wake of the Ravager

message: External links are provided documenting this particular program, so I fail to understand why the editor chose to put a "Notability" tag on it, especially as said editor failed to give his/her justification for adding said tag. Granted it doesn't have the greatest sources, but they are there, so unless we are going to remove the listings for all the mediocre, "spew out a generic sequel to bring in money for this fiscal quarter" software titles on Wikipedia, then I am going to remove this tag. AntarcticFox (talk) 18:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability Tag? 