lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Apollo program

message: This recently appeared: Casey Dreier, "An Improved Cost Analysis of the Apollo Program"
. Should used to update this wikipedia article. Jess_Riedel (talk) 00:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New academic cost analysis of Apollo 

message: Launch Operations Centre could also mention the Saturn/Apollo Mobile Service Structure. There was only one, shared between 39A and 39B., (It is mentioned in Kennedy_Space_Center_Launch_Complex_39#Apollo_and_Skylab but not here). Seems it was moved using the Crawler. - Rod57 (talk) 10:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of Mobile service structure  

message: Wasn't Apollo 13 only a partial failure? 2600:1008:B13E:6E8D:C091:9A4B:6099:AA7B (talk) 16:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Read through the article or do a web page search. The Mission summary table entry mentions the "successful failure" label by NASA. -Fnlayson (talk) 01:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: How is that different than Apollo 6, then? 2603:6000:8740:54B1:C4DD:72CB:52B5:8898 (talk) 21:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apollo 13 

message: per WP:ONEWAY 
Reliable sources do not mention conspiracy theories when they talk about the Apollo program. Parham wiki (talk) 11:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conspiracy theories 

message: In the first paragraph after the sentence "By 1971, the decision was made to also cancel missions 18 and 19." The next sentence says "The two unused Saturn Vs became museum exhibits....." but then goes on to list 4 locations.  Did all 4 locations get a Saturn V? I know the first two listed did, not sure about the others.
Sorry, I could not log in to Wikipedia, I could not remember which email address I used for my account, and therefore could not reset my password (assuming I created an account in the first place.  It's been a long time since I edited anything).
Jim 2603:9000:9A06:BE39:25E7:CBD8:9D8C:3775 (talk) 06:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: How to 119.155.168.70 (talk) 07:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission Cutbacks Section - Clarification needed
Talk:Assault

message: Yes, Men Can Be Raped
All though a large percentage of rapists are men, there are some male rape victims out there in the world. Male rape victims are usually boys, who's preditor can  vary from there own mothers, teachers, and strangers. Many have made the claim that boys that have been raped have enjoyed the event, which is invalid because even if they did enjoy it, it is still not consent, and minors who are raped cannot give consent because they do not know any better. However, if the victim does like it, they should not be blamed for it because sex is too be pleasing, and it is still the woman's fualt for taking advantage of a minor. But despite these claims, many of the male rape victims may not enjoy it, because the women may threaten, beat, hurt, or make them uncomfortable during the event. Women have no excuse for raping a male minor as men have no excuse for raping a female minor. Male or female, the predator must be brought to justice.
Although a majority of male rape victims are minors, it is not impossible for a female to rape a grown man. A common way to rape a male is to drug them, or assualt them as they sleep, especially if they are drunk. Or, if the male is injured, then she could easily take advantage of him. Whether he likes it or not, the woman still assaulted him, because he did not give her consent. Rape is rape, even if the victim is silent. Many people may claim that the male should have been more alert, or that the male should have not been drunk. This is called victim blaming. While the situation could have been avoided if he did not get drunk, the rape is still rape, especially since the women took advantage of his dicision. Drunkenness is not a crime that the man committed, and he is a human being no matter how immature or uncareful he is. Drunk or not, he does not deserve to be raped. No human being does.
Another form of the raping of men is homosexual rape. A male can overpower a male, and the predator can use almost any scheme to get his hands on the victim. 
Although the main issues on the subject of rape are on women, and have females as the usual victims, I am writing this article for people who make the fantasy that rape only hurts females, not males. Anyone can be victims of rape, no matter what gender, race, or background.
Article bye CarpetCoyote CarpetCoyote (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Details aside, this is covered at rape of males. Does this article suggest that men are not or cannot be victims of rape? EvergreenFir (talk) 05:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes, Men Can Be Raped
Talk:Atlas (disambiguation)

message: True or false: this article belongs at Atlas (disambiguation) and Atlas (cartography) at Atlas. 66.245.105.237 01:08, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  True or false?? 

message: I propose adding Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS), a space-based lidar instrument on ICESat-2.  The instrument does not have it's own page.  But, it's the main part of the sateille. Let me know if there are any objections. - DutchTreat (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Added into the section on Space - DutchTreat (talk) 11:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrument on ICESat-2  

message: In the Brands and enterprises section, there is an entry Atlas Sound for "an audio and IP electronics company". The current wikilink is a redirect to the page Bradford Cox#Atlas Sound, a solo musical project.   I propose that this wikilink should be removed from this article. DutchTreat (talk) 11:08, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: To further clarify, I was unable to find an article about the electronics company on the English WP.  The entry about the company could stand without a wikilink or the entry could be removed.  I vote for keeping the entry with no wikilink. - DutchTreat (talk) 11:21, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Comments on my proposed change? My previous attempt was reverted. - DutchTreat (talk) 11:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: What is point of removing this? The entry satisfies WP:DABMENTION. A stand-alone article is not necessary for inclusion on disambiguation page. And to second suggestion, every entry on a disambiguation page should have a blue link. older ≠ wiser 23:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The current wikilink to solo musical project of Bradford Cox#Atlas Sound is unrelated to Atlas Sound an audio and IP electronics company, known as Atlas Sound  and Innovative Electronic Designs (IED).  Therefore, to me it seems confusing to retain this link to a musician.  When and if there is an article written on the WP about this audio/electronics company then the wikilink may be added.  I am comfortable keeping the item in the list without the internal WP wikilink. - DutchTreat (talk) 14:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seeking a WP:THIRDOPINION on best way to wikilink. - DutchTreat (talk) 13:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

text: After receiving no input, I will go forth in good faith and implement what I see is the best solution. Add an entry under section on Entertainment about the Bradford Cox project which includes the wikilink and further clarify the name of the company.  Feel free to comment below if there is a different way that you think this should be handled. - DutchTreat (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed. The wikilink to Bradford Cox stands and the item (with no WP article) on the company of same name has been removed by User:Bkonrad. - DutchTreat (talk) 12:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlas Sound, company
Talk:Alternate history

message: 'Alternative history' is an exclusively British English term according to this article, when in fact it is simply correct English, as any good dictionary will attest.
The title of the page should be 'Alternative history' and in the first sentence it should be noted 'often incorrectly referred to as Alternate history '. --217.42.52.22 (talk) 13:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't matter. "Alternate history" is what it's called in American English, and that's what the article used when it was first started. See Talk:Alternate history/Archive 3#Alternative vs Alternate for a 2015 discussion, and links there to previous discussions on the subject. - BilCat (talk) 13:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Alternative', not 'alternate'. 

message: There's also the Tumblr site , "A Neo-Atomic Tango Thru a World of Dreams: 
We travel, record, observe, and document-- and are always home just in time for supper." 
Thnidu (talk) 19:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tumblr site
Talk:Austrian school of economics

message: I added this from Criticism of Austrian Economics.   The source is aimed at students learning economics and the authors understand the subject. Coral matters (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Im not at all convinced this source is particularly reliable.  It appears to be just a blog.  Further, i dont think the material added is particularly helpful. Im each case, it appears you are simply restating what has already been said better and with attribution.  If, for example, Jeffrey Sachs thinks "that among developed countries, those with high rates of taxation and high social welfare spending perform better on most measures of economic performance" there is no need to restate that exactly, but without attribution. Bonewah (talk) 16:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the material about the negative multiplir was already in the article.  I restored it. Coral matters (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of Austrian School
Talk:Asa

message: Would it not make sense to combine this page with ASA? three links could easily be incorporated into the ASA disambiguation page. Or move ASA to here, either would work.70.49.36.110 23:22, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. However, it may be too onerous to find all the links into this page and to update them. As well, in the future people may end up re-creating this page... Instead, I chose to keep both pages, using ASA for the related initialisms and Asa for names. ppblais 03:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On combining this page with the '''ASA''' page
Talk:Amitabh Bachchan

message: The English in both the main article and Talk is not too good. I intend editing the main article. Moitraanak (talk) 13:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Used 

message: In Superstardom (1975–1988) / Coolie incident, change:
*"the public response included prayers in temples and offers to"
to:
*"the public response included prayers in temples, mosques and churches, and offers to"
(as per source https://www.hindustantimes.com/bollywood/amitabh-bachchan-claims-fans-love-led-to-his-second-birth-post-coolie-accident-says-it-is-a-debt-that-i-shall-never-be-able-to-repay/story-JWS27wFOCsc3Xv6lHAy4pM.html https://www.cinestaan.com/articles/2019/aug/2/21927/amitabh-bachchan-remembers-coolie-accident-anniversary-with-love-and-respect)
--148.252.129.153 (talk) 15:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 06:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 September 2023 

message: Explore Amitabh Bachchan's impressive height in feet, standing at approximately 6 feet 2 inches (1.88 meters). Discover the real dimensions behind his larger-than-life persona and how his towering presence has left an indelible mark on Bollywood. Unveil the truth about Amitabh Bachchan's height in feet and his enduring legacy in Indian cinema DilshadBhai239 (talk) 17:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amitabh Bachchan's Height: A Tale of Inches and Impact
Talk:Audi

message: In the model list please change
Change
Q3	Compact crossover SUV	
SUV
to 
Q3 Subcompact crossover SUV	
SUV
as the  Q3 is subcompact and the Q5 is Audis compact SUV 71.173.76.19 (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2022 

message: German automobile the sport Audi the 1909-present on Lamborghini 82.78.75.133 (talk) 15:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audi 

message: :File:Audi Logo.svg
 82.78.75.133 (talk) 15:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: T
his logo makes unique  102.88.68.38 (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The logo
Talk:Africa Alphabet

message: Is it called the Africa alphabet or the African alphabet? --LMS
The source I'm giving calls it 'Africa alphabet'.  I don't know yet if it has been called 'African alphabet' as well. Hannes Hirzel
There really is an institution called International Africa Institute
see http://www.aim25.ac.uk/search/thesaurus/corps/list8.htm
User:Hirzel
A chapter by Sow & Abdulaziz in a larger work (referenced in the article) uses 2 other names which I have added to the intro para: International African Alphabet and IAI alphabet. The chapter has a short discussion on IAI. --A12n 22:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the alphabet

message: Are all the uppercase forms given in the article actually what were proposed in 1928/30? Based on examples of usage in the 1930 IIALC publication, there is a question of usage for the upper case of ɓ. --A12n 18:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The form of the upper case ɓ in the Africa Alphabet is indeed Б and not the current form, Ɓ. I will insert that in the table with an asterisk.--A12n 14:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uppercase forms in original Africa Alphabet

message: Should mention that it's more or less a subset of the IPA, with uppercase forms provided, and the substitutions "y" = IPA [j] and "j" = IPA [dʒ] or similar... AnonMoos (talk) 14:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: IPA connection
Talk:ANZAC

message: Why is there a separate article at Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (army corps)?  Should the two be merged?--A  Y  Arktos 10:15, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with [[Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (army corps)]] 

message: ANZAC is currently a disambiguation page listing Anzac biscuits and so forth. Every single thing on the page is named after the Australian and NZ Army Corps, so it seems a bit ridiculous for ANZAC to be a disambiguation page rather than a redirect to here. I propose making ANZAC (disambiguation) the disambiguation page, and ANZAC a redirect to here. --Helenalex (talk) 03:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANZAC redirect 

message: The original term 'ANZAC' began as a telegraphic address. We refer to it now as an 'acronym', but that terminology was never used in contemporary writing on the topic, probably because the use of acronyms - and I mean the actual definition of an acronym , not an abbreviation - was nowhere near as common in 1915 as it is today. The soldiers were known as 'Anzacs', the holiday as 'Anzac Day' and the location as 'Anzac Cove' and the 'Anzac sector'. All contemporary sources refer to these as proper nuns, not as fully-capitalised acronyms. For references see the Wikipedia discussion on the 'Anzac Day' page. Similarly, I Anzac Corps and II Anzac Corps were not named 'I ANZAC Corps' and 'II ANZAC Corps' (besides which the the final 'C' in 'ANZAC' stands for 'Corps' anyway), and the Anzac Mounted Division was not named 'ANZAC Mounted Division'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayaman (talk • contribs) 04:12, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANZAC / Anzac 

message: *Neutral on ANZAC → Anzac. I know the term principally as the acronym in all caps (WWI history) so I am going to differ to Australians and kiwis on this one.  Oppose ANZACS (TV series) → Anzacs. I would support ANZACS (TV series) → Anzacs (TV series), I think the qualifier is needed. The term Anzacs appears to be more commonly used describe pluralized ANZAC troops. So I'd like to see Anzacs point to Anzac, not the show. Support the remainder. --Labattblueboy (talk) 18:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for commenting. I think with the tv show, you could just use a hatnote to direct people looking for the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps, but whatever works. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 18:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Proposed merger of ANZAC into Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. All the content of Anzac relates to the WWI Corps. I certainly view the Corps as the primary topics. Opinions? --Labattblueboy (talk) 18:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be inclined to keep them seperate, but you do have a point in that much of the content is duplicated. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 18:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Anatolia

message: Why are there an Entire section of Unsourced and uncited Section in this article that talk about major immigrations without a single source about it? I Also don't think Mentioning Armenian Genocide more than 5 times is Relevant to the Article at all, Sure the first one about Renaming of Armenian/Turkish Highlands to Eastern Anatolia Region and Kurdish Vilayets to South Eastern Anatolia Region can be Arguably Related but the other 4 times is just taking the piss out of it. there is Also no Mention of how Inner Anatolia was Populated after the Bronze age collapse and about the 6th century BCE Migrations of Armenians into Anatolia. Article should be Reviewed and Rewritten and actually put in an orderly conduct. MAngO K1nGo (talk) 16:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations and Relevancy to the Article
Talk:Aluminium

message: Do we say aluminium or aluminum? Adipy (talk) 19:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spellings 

message: The last few years, excessive use of semicolon is observed in Wikipedia. It appears a whopping 67 times in this article. 193.242.214.5 (talk) 04:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: And colons appear 261 times, while my computer gave up on counting commas after a thousand. What makes 67 unreasonable? Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 12:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

text: There are some places where it might be better suited to have a period, but the article is >7,500 words long. Some things are better expressed with semicolons. Reconrabbit 17:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Abuse of Semicolon 

message: Change Aluminium to Aluminum 2603:6011:A442:6A00:5CE4:1AC9:522B:467C (talk) 17:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , please read Talk:Aluminium/Spelling. --McSly (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2024
Talk:Arianism

message: Arianism is widely regarded as a heresy, and is listed as such by Encyclopædia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/summary/Arianism#:~:text=Arianism%2C%20Christian%20heresy%20that%20declared,a%20creature%20with%20a%20beginning.
I would argue that the term "Christological doctrine" used on this page is not satisfactory; it does not indicate the fact that this doctrine is deemed heresy by the vast majority of Christians.
Perhaps a term combining both of these aspects of the doctrine would be more suitable, such as "Heretical Christological doctrine", or similar. 85.166.156.145 (talk) 11:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Heresy is a recurring topic of this Wikipedia article on Arianism, so I agree that the first sentence should reflect this better. In the current version heresy is not mentioned before the third paragraph, an the wording "Christological doctrine" could make a casual reader expect Arianism to be a core belief for many Christians, which is clearly not the case when all mainstream branches of Christianity consider Arianism to be heresy. When prompting ChatGPT to summarize Arianism based on the first part of the Wikipedia article, the contrast to mainstream Christianity (https://chat.openai.com/share/cd974aac-f43c-431a-ae71-50d06f511a7b). It should also be noted that the Wikipedia article on Christianity do not bother to include nontrinitarians when graphically presenting the major branches of Christianity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity#Churches_and_denominations). 2001:700:302:10:0:0:0:24 (talk) 16:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Arianism used to be a core belief for many Christians in the High Middle Ages. In particular, bishop Ulfilas, apostle to the Goths and author of the Gothic thanslation of the Bible, was of that tendency. Arianism was, however, fought against by Christians holding opposite beliefs, who pejoratively labeled it heresy in order better to destroy it, and the result is that with the passing of time it has all but disappeared. From a Catholic, Orthodox, or even (I think) Protestant point of view Arianism is still considered heresy, but let us not forget that any Christian system of belief not in agreement with the doctrines of Rome (including, to mention the two most controversial tenets, Mary's immaculate conception and the Pope's infallibility) is also held as heresy by the Roman church regardless of the number of its practitioners. IMHO labeling Arianism as heresy all the way from top to bottom of the article would be against WP:NPOV. — Tonymec (talk) 21:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I endorse "heresy", so long as we explain that heretics and not wrong by default, and the orthodox are not right by default. Besides, many Christian denominations call many other Christian denominations "heretics", so it's not like Wikipedia is taking sides. That is, for every Christian, it is quite normal that they are considered heretics by dozens of Christian denominations. tgeorgescu (talk)  07:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Christological doctrine" vs "Heresy"
Talk:Autoerotic asphyxiation

message: Does anyone have any evidence that the musician Kevin Gilbert died of this condition?  you may want to check out his article.--Mikepope 05:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kevin Gilbert

message: Too much focus on death, e.g. "It is an extremely dangerous practice that results in many deaths each year." Njál
I concur, this article is pathetically one-sided and does absolutely nothing to educate people about safe ways to asphxiate themselves. Wrath0fb0b
It's not supposed to tell people how to Asphyxiate themselves, safely or not. --Xdiabolicalx 17:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I first read about this practice in The Evil That Men Do by Roy Hazelwood, an FBI profiler.  He did some writing on the subject that brought it to the attention of coroners and law enforcement.  Before Hazelwood came along, hangings were automatically written off as suicides.  Now, thanks to him, we get speculation about whether certain celebrities were masturbating with a noose around the neck or were actually trying to commit suicide. BrianGCrawfordMA 17:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of Roy Hazelwood?

message: I've removed the part about Jerzy Kosiński just before Michael Hutchence as on his own page it makes no mention of AA but says there is a suicide note, which you wouldn't do if you were performing AA would you? --Xdiabolicalx 17:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerzy Kosiński