lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Catherine de Castelbajac

message: I reverted edits by User:Adv100 since they removed substantial referenced content and added the following unreferenced material:
:President and CEO of C de C, inc. an accessory company based in New York and Los Angeles. She was a fashion journalist and former model, as well as executive and entrepreur. Castelbajac received an MBA from Simmons Graduate School of Management in 1995, and authored a 200 page critically acclaimed history of aesthetics, THE FACE OF THE CENTURY, 100 YEARS OF FASHION AND STYLE,published by Rizzoli in 1995. She then founded Beauty Basics, an Internet company for beauty products. She has written articles for Brillscontent.com, House and Garden, French Vogue, and was a founding editor of Mirabella Magazine working from Paris, where she lived for 20 years.
If somebody would like to verify this and provide references for it, that would be great. --Michael Snow 22:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: In an effort to flesh this out some more, I've discovered that she had a profile of some sort in Harper's Bazaar, February 1989. The article is "Multitalented Muse: Kate de Castelbajac" by Christopher Petkanas, in Vol. 122, Iss. 3326, pg. 108. That's the information I have on it from various databases, which unfortunately do not carry the article itself. A librarian or someone else with professional access to better databases might be able to come up with it, but so far that hasn't happened. If not, it may be left to the challenge of tracking down a hard copy. Any assistance along these lines is welcome. --Michael Snow 04:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Harper's article

message: I briefly overlooked the conflicting information on her birthplace. The Mehrens article serves as a source for saying Santa Barbara; I haven't seen any source saying Los Angeles, so Santa Barbara is what we have. If it's wrong, some pretty concrete evidence would be wanted to show that. --Michael Snow (talk) 04:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: I imported and abbreviated some material concerning a well-documented, high-profile lawsuit from the Bill Koch article, including an LA Times source citation. Similar material has previously been deleted from the present article because of "blp issues" and lack of sourcing. But in fact the previously deleted material was equally inadequate in respect of sourcing as the rest of the article, and the effect of the previous edit was to sanitize the treatment of the subject of this biography. Mstarli (talk) 20:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial biographical material
Talk:1957 NBA Finals

message: How can I tell who won each game?  Is it the one in bold?  There should be a key to make that clear. 98.82.190.59 (talk) 04:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a key 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nba.com/celtics/history/Recap_1950s.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:1962 NBA Finals

message: An anon user seems insistent upon inserting an incorrect box score for game 7 of the 1962 NBA Finals in both this article as well as 1962 NBA Playoffs, and this user does this with no explanation given in the edit summary.  There are multiple sources (print versions of NBA guides and encyclopedias) that state the box score of the game was 110 to 107, and there's a screenshot of a newsprint box score of the game at  that is hard to dispute.  I've now added the latter link as a reference to the box score.  If further vandalism occurs, I'll request that this page be semi-protected. — Myasuda (talk) 02:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game 7 of the 1962 NBA Finals
Talk:1965 NBA Finals

message: The article states that ABC dropped out of its coverage of Game 4 before it ended, supposedly causing a hassle similar to NBC's handling of the infamous "Heidi Game" three years later. But after checking several TV listings in various newspapers, it appears that ABC didn't air Game 4 at all, let alone cut it off. It seems that ABC ran its regular Friday line-up that night, April 23, 1965: The Farmer's Daughter, The Addams Family, Valentine's Day, a documentary on FDR and 12 O'Clock High. (The Chicago Tribune has a listing that day for "NBA Playoff Game", not on ABC but on independent Channel 26, at 10:30 Central Time, presumably on tape.) Anybody? Dr Clyde Crashcup (talk) 21:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, the game was played in Los Angeles, starting at 8:30 Pacific time, and as such wouldn't have been shown in prime time in most of the country in any case. (The game was blacked out in LA, and wasn't shown in San Francisco, either.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Clyde Crashcup (talk • contribs) 21:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game 4 on TV?
Talk:1975 NBA Finals

message: Here is the paragraph from the source: Washington had home-court advantage for the Finals, but it would not be possible to use the normal 2-2-1-1-1 format due to scheduling conflicts with the Warriors’ arena, so the NBA presented two options to Bullets’ coach KC Jones: play Game 1 on the road and the next three at home or play game one at home and then the next two on the road. Jones did not want his team to fall behind early, so he chose to have Game 1 at home. This backfired when the Warriors beat the Bullets in Washington, 101-95. Barry scored 36 points to lead Golden State to a 92-91 victory in Game 2 at the Cow Palace. Bash Kash (talk) 23:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote 
Talk:1976 NBA Finals

message: I watched Game 5 of the Finals and I am pretty certain that Dave Cowens and John Havlicek had more than the 5 rebounds they are credited with in the "Game 5" section of this entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.152.197 (talk) 08:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game 5 stats
Talk:1987 NBA Finals

message: There was a TNT's Open Court episode in which Chris Webber and someone else critiqued Magic Johnson's decision to take the Game 4 "baby" hook shot instead of passing to a wide-open Kareem underneath.  I was wondering if a reference to this should be added to the Game 4 synopsis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebeholder138 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

message: This article's reference isn't enough and is not the most realiable.
Robert4565 (talk) 03:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: bad Reference
Talk:Gravest Hits

message: My dad has this album, and we both know it has nothing to do with surf rock. Surf rock was an influence on psychobilly anyway. Metal of Head 10:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've removed it. Psychobilly tends to have a surf edge at times too, but this album isn't really a Shadowy Men on a Shadowy Planet or Is it man or astro man album. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of surviving Boeing B-47 Stratojets

message: creator / editorDavegnz 16:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The separating out of "survivors" is okay, but Davegnz needs to spend more time on cleaning up the article with identifying all the related internal links and understand the nomenclature of editing before taking on a large task.  Correct categories need to be added.  Don't leave your project incomplete, finish what you have started. LanceBarber 05:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Since Davegnz just wholesale removed the table format with an edit summary of "tables do not work - never have worked, never will work with this series - returned article to original status", and was quickly reverted, I thought I'd drop my 2c in here that I prefer and suppport the table format. Anyone else care to comment? AKRadeckiSpeaketh 14:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Table is fine. --John (talk) 14:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say it looks OK as I created the table format with comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft/Archive_22#Survivors as it looks a lot better than previous non-encyclopedic look, the intention is to convert all the survivor articles in time. MilborneOne (talk) 17:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table format
Talk:Concert champêtre

message: "Concert champêtre (Rural Concerto) is a harpsichord concerto by Francis Poulenc, which also exists in a version for piano solo with very slight changes in the solo part." 
This is not true; the piano score has quite a few differences.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarvislunt (talk • contribs) 17:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on reduction 

message: "Like many harpsichord works from the 20th century, this piece was written for the 'revival' harpsichord which was prevalent at the time, rather than historic instruments from the 17th and 18th century, which may need to be amplified to be heard in a large orchestral setting (although Trevor Pinnock has played and recorded it on a 3-manual Hass instrument with disposition 16' 8' 8 ' 4' 2', lute, 2 buffs, 2 couplers.)."
Is it that the 17th-/18th-century instruments need amplification or the 'revival' instruments? In fact, both probably require amplification, given the large orchestration.
Also, I think that the entire sentence implies that--in spite of the comment about Pinnock--the concerto is not really for antique-style instruments. Perhaps it would be better to simply state that the concerto was written with the Pleyel in mind?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarvislunt (talk • contribs) 17:53, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on instrument 

message: How is this piece neoclassical? Hyacinth (talk) 05:41, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "The piece alludes to music of the Baroque period, when the harpsichord was a common instrument, both in terms of its melodic and harmonic language and in its structure". Of course, this statement is uncited, but it should not take very long to find a reliable source.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 05:56, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I didn't think it would take long. Sources now added.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 06:53, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neoclassical
Talk:KDSK (AM)

message: Can someone find reliable sources for the history information in this article?--Rtphokie (talk) 19:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  history 

message: Although JenniRadio seems to still exist as an Internet radio station, I don't think it's on KALY/KDSK anymore… the website for KDSK-FM mentions 1240 AM in a way that indicates that KDSK and KDSK-FM now simulcast the oldies format that has been on the FM side in Grants for the past decade or so — quite a change from the children's radio formats KALY had under JenniRadio and Radio Disney. (The history page of a California-based Internet-and-cable radio station, "KD Radio," that has some close ties to KDSK says so as well.) (KALY's page on the JenniRadio site is still up, but looks to have not been touched since August 2012; the "KD Radio" site says KDSK began simulcasting on 1240 AM on August 20, 2012. More recent postings indicate that JenniRadio's lone broadcast presence now is on another Grants station, KKGT.) Since the AM 1240 format has changed but the non-station-related sources are scarce, updates are needed… --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:54, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed — format change
Talk:Les biches

message: This article states that this ballet has something to do with "paintings of Watteau that depict Louis XV and various women at the Parc aux Biches".  Antoine Watteau died in 1721, when Louis XV was 11 !
As far as I am concerned, the Parc aux Biches is a skying resort near the Massif Central. Nothing to do. There was something called the Parc aux Cerfs ['Stag Park'], a kind of bawdy house kept for the adult Louis XV's benefit, long after Watteau's death.
In fact this ballet makes no historical references.
208.87.248.162 (talk) 12:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I notice that when this article was first written it referred to "Louis XIV". Presumably this was correct? The article is badly in need of citations to sources. --Deskford (talk) 13:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: UTTER NONSENSE
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Greenland/Greenland nature galleries

message: I have started a resource that I hope will be further developed. It started as part of my work in developing the Reindeer hunting in Greenland article, and it may as well be available for other project members. -- Fyslee/talk 05:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New project resource 

message: It would be great if the Latin classifications were added. -- Fyslee/talk 07:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin classifications
Talk:Concerts royaux (Couperin)

message: The link to sheet music (Werner Ickling) provides a modern edition, not a facsimile of the original.  There is an original at free-scores.com.  I will fix the link later but I have misplaced the web address at the moment.
Couperin says in the preface that the concerts may be played on several different instruments.  However, there are several instances in the music where certain instruments such as flute, violin, etc. are suggested for particular passages, especially in the 3rd concert.  The last movement of the first concert is a trio, written on 3 staves.  This is still playable with two hands on the harpsichord (although a few passages look a bit awkward for two hands) but the fact that it was written on 3 staves suggested that Couperin had 3 separate instruments in mind.
Also, the harpsichord part includes figured bass symbols.  Presumably these would not be used if the pieces were played by solo harpsichord but they could be used when a harpsichordist accompanied other instruments.  I'm trying to figure out how to convey this information in a more "encyclopedic" manner...
Jkisch (talk) 19:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits suggested
Talk:Dante Symphony

message: Just read about new film of Dan Brown's _Inferno_. Will film respect the fact that the only text actually sung in the work is the final movement, Paradiso" which is a setting of the Magnificat for treble voices. The chant references in the score of the first movement are ONLY that - references to the chant associated with the texts. Brown incorrectly cites them as being sung during the performance of the work in the underground water works toward the end of his novel. Tsk, tsk. tsk... will Ron Howard honor that truth?
Dfredebs (talk) 00:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:2007 FIVB Volleyball Women's World Cup

message: China did not participate, why?
: China  cannot participate in any qualification tournament. Link WildCherry06 17:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Faust Symphony

message: I don't think that the instruments required are as small as the article had stated. At least, there are two more flutes or one more contrabassoon. (Addaick 14:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instruments required 

message: Look it up in the Liszt article! 93.219.134.24 (talk) 07:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ... which soundly refutes any such notion.  I don't know what you've been reading.  This issue has been debated endlessly on his Talk page, and always the consensus is that he was Hungarian.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 07:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liszt was German, not Hungarian! 

message: This article was originally created with what seems to be the best title, 'A Faust Symphony'; then it acquired its current title, 'Faust Symphony', with an m edit summary. A move to 'A Faust Symphony in three character studies' was reverted, possibly because it's a bit unwieldy. However, consider the following:
*A London Symphony, A Sea Symphony and A Pastoral Symphony by Ralph Vaughan Williams, but...
**Symphony of Psalms by Igor Stravinsky: and...
*A Colour Symphony by Arthur Bliss, but...
**Universe Symphony, by Charles Ives, or The Cotswolds (symphony) by Gustav Holst: and...
*An Alpine Symphony (Eine Alpensinfonie) by Richard Strauss, and...
*...thus A Faust Symphony (Eine Faust-Sinfonie), to which I propose to move it.
  >MinorProphet (talk) 01:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Talk:Harmonies poétiques et religieuses

message: Ok, starting ca.1847 would be clearer, since the set includes works from 1849, etc. IMSLP has several versions of this piece including version 3 which was the published version, and which has 1848–1853 "including versions of earlier compositions (see above)". Hrm... (Yes, I began the article here and am contradicting myself. Insert obligatory Whitman quote. ;) ) Schissel | Sound the Note! 13:57, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dating
Talk:WALL

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. It's not about which subject is more famous, just that the radio station is primarily identified by this name while the airport is primarily identified by its full name with the ICAO code only a secondary reference to that airport. - Dravecky (talk) 05:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Nuages gris

message: There are a couple of factual problems with this article.
First, the statement that the melody makes extensive reference to the G Lydian mode is just plain wrong.  It does not at any point use the Lydian mode, in G or any other key.  I would guess that the C# in the opening motif is what led an earlier editor to believe this uses the Lydian mode in G.  It is true that C# does appear in the Lydian mode on G, but not in either the major or minor scales based on G - and it does appear in this melody.  But for it to be in the Lydian mode, all (or nearly all) the notes would have to correspond - not just one note, even if it is a prominent and unusual one.  For reference, the Lydian mode on G would go thus: G A B C# D E F# G, and not use Bb at all, whereas all the Bs in this melody are Bb.
Secondly, I dispute the statement about this piece using quartal harmony.  I presume this statement is based on the fact that the first three notes of the motif contain two 4th intervals in them (the perfect 4th D-G, followed by the augmented 4th G-C#).  However, I believe more than this is required for a passage or piece to be described as using quartal harmony: a preponderance of the harmonies overall should be based on 4ths.  It would be quite easy for these two 4ths to arise quite naturally in the course of ordinary tonal (tertial) harmony, and I believe this is the case here - most of this piece can be analyzed either as G minor with an occasional chromatic C#, or as consecutive augmented triads based on a two-note ostinato in the bass - neither of which is quartal, even if some of the major 3rds augmented triads are made up of are notated as diminished 4ths.  This is little more than an enharmonic anomaly resulting from the unsuitability for augmented triad or whole-tone-based harmony of our music notation system, which historically was based on diatonic scales: in such a system, some major 3rds have to be notated as diminished 4ths if you are not to get tangled up in thickets of double-sharps or -flats, but they in no way function as real 4ths of any kind.
I am considering whether to change the article.  I don't quite know, though, whether to change the statements to what I think they should be (and I do have the theoretical knowledge of harmony to analyze the piece up to a reasonable point), or whether to simply remove the statements.  But I think this article is quite misleading - plain wrong, in fact - as it currently stands.
Anyone else care to give an opinion?
Thanks. M.J.E. (talk) 13:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The title should be changed too. Authoritative sources, like the Neue Liszt-Ausgabe and Grove (not to mention the First edition), refer to it using the German title: Trübe Wolken. --Funper (talk) 03:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical details are wrong.
Talk:KMMQ

message: Postings on message boards are not acceptable as reliable sources for Wikipedia.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 06:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay - here is the scoop and the source of the confusion.  NRG Media did a call sign swap in January 2009.  Read about it here.  The News/Talk format is now on AM 1180 (with the KOIL callsign) and the Regional Mexican Format is now on AM 1020 KMMQ.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:The Shepherd on the Rock

message: What's the point of the paragraph listing "Singers who have made recordings of this work"? It's unsourced, contains ten red links, and I fail to see its relevance in its current form. If it were a proper dicography, it might be useful, but that is probably better served by a search through Amazon or CD Universe or similar merchants. I suggest to remove it. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:34, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Singers

message: Arrrggh!  I have screwed up the headings in the "complete text" section and cannot figure out how to fix them.  Please revert my edits!  Thanks, and sorry Goblinshark17 (talk) 02:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Error editing, please correct
Talk:Die schöne Müllerin

message: What is the point of that template?  The source is obviously the work itself.  It's just dumb to complain about that.--345Kai (talk) 03:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Very few aspects of a musical composition can be self-sourced by the score. Here, the section "Synopsis" is full of analysis and interpretation. Such material needs to be supported by reliable sources. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  template about missing sources