lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey/New article announcements

message: Hi, I am in the trial runs of the User:AlexNewArtBot (see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/AlexNewArtBot). The bot analyzes the new articles for a day and puts suspected Turkey-related articles into User:AlexNewArtBot/TurkeySearchResult, the articles are suppose to be manually put into the portal page and/or removed if irrelevant.
The list of rules are in User:AlexNewArtBot/Turkey the first pattern between the slashes on each line is the pattern that should be present in the article to trigger the rule (note the case insensitive match. The other patterns on the same line are suppose to inhibit the rule. E.g. for the Russian board /florida/ inhibits /petersburg/ rule as the article is most probably about the American city. If you are reasonably familiar with the regular expressions and know what you are doing, you can edit the rules straight away, but better ask me. In the Russian board I had to remove some rules: e.g. there are a lot of non-Russians named Vladimir and Chita, so I had to remove the names of the cities or have to much false positive. If you are interested why an article went to the list there is log on the User:AlexNewArtBot/TurkeyLog explaining the rule that sent an article to the searchresults (if the log  is cleared try to look into the history of the log).
That is all. Any suggestions are welcome. Alex Bakharev 20:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:AlexNewArtBot]] - New Article Bot 

message: Do we know why three battles of Ramla appear in the new article anouncements ? Ramla is not in Turkey and the fighting parties are not Turks. I consider to clear those three battles from this list. But befote that I'll consult with the editor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The links to three battles are cleared out. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Ramla 

message: Any idea why the articles Baliza Hill, La Morenita (Antarctica) and Midway Drive-In (Texas) appear as the new article announcements in Project Turkey ? Well the last one refers to Turkey. But that Turkey is a small town of 494 inhabitants in Texas. For the other I found no clue. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrevelant articles 

message: The bot for the new pages usually works fine. But the present new articles page in Project Turkey begins by November 11 and the last archieved page (#12) ends by November 7. There is a gap between these two points. Was the bot on vacation ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nov7-Nov 11
Talk:The Legend of Heroes II: Prophecy of the Moonlight Witch

message: Were the Saturn, PS1 and Windows ports all released in the same year? SharkD (talk) 00:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ports 

message: This doesn't seem encyclopedia-worthy. Is there any info other than about the plot and story of this videogame that is significant? Comatmebro (talk) 22:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Significance
Talk:The Wedding (1972 film)

message: The article is in the process of being substantialy expanded. Therefore, a number of flags from the talk page are now being removed, except for the WikiProject Films. 
::Please take a second look at the article. Most requested inclussions are already there. --Poeticbent  talk  19:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: It has been proposed that The Wedding (1972 film) be moved to Wesele for the sake of simplicity? There’s no article on the play by Wyspiański called "Wesele" and yet, the spoiler for the film reveals its entire plot with ending details. “Wesele” is the original title of the 1901 play on which movie by Wajda (1972) was based. In case of a naming conflict between the two, the title can be expanded in future articles on the same subject, which is unlikely considering, that the story line and the history of the play are already explained here. One good example of a similar simplification is Being There with two paralel meanings. Is a well known movie based on a well known book, combined into one article. Both are closely related. 
::BTW - The Wedding (2004 film) made by Smarzowski is a modern comedy that has nothing to do with "Wesele" by Wyspiański and the Young Poland movement, or Wajda and his cinematography. For example, at the Internet Movie Database it goes by the title "Wesele (2004)" and not "The Wedding".  That's the way it could also be named in Wikipedia. Thanks for the understanding. --Poeticbent  talk  22:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have copied relevant fragments and created the The Wedding (1901 play) article. Wesele now redirects there.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  15:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wesele 
Talk:Schloss Benrath

message: *The German wikipedia article has further information worth translating here. --Wetman 16:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Under the heading "Buildings", the fourth paragraph begins "From the predescant castle..."  I don't know if perhaps this was a transliteration from the original German, but I don't think it's intelligible in English.  Can anyone help make sense of it?  Thanks! Bricology (talk) 20:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Predescant"? 

message: It would be very useful if someone could reference whether you need to pay to enter the park and museum, and add external links to them if you do. Tomhannen (talk) 09:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry requirements?
Talk:The Wedding (2004 film)

message: I've upgraded importance to mid. A class from Wayne State deemed Wajda's film of the same title to be of "high importance," that it was "an important specimen of Polish film." (See User:POL SLA 3750 WSU W2007). Yet the Polish Wikipedia has more on Smarzowski's film (an entire article, in fact) while Wajda's film barely gets a line in the Wajda article (in the filmography). The WSU class watched both films. With these things considered, I think this film merits at least a medium importance rating. Anton Mravcek 19:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trier Cathedral

message: This looks like the Romanesque cathedral.  The Basilica of Constantine an older building a couple blocks away is the actual Roman one.  Here's a link to the German wiki about it. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konstantinbasilika  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.23.42.251 (talk) 14:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the right one? 

message: the page gives the impression that the Trier Dom is the UNESCO world heritage site.  In fact it is in combination with the Liebfrauenkirche and the Roman Monuments in Trier.  I propose making a single page for the UNESCO site, with individual pages for the different parts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WIKI1Q2W3E4R (talk • contribs) 04:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This alone is not a UNESCO site
Talk:Melitta

message: --Synhuliak (talk) 11:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation
Talk:Palatinate Forest

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Palatine Forest/Leading Articles to the page Portal:Palatine Forest/Leading Articles.
Please
participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  John Vandenberg (chat) 09:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palatine Forest/Leading Articles listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Palatine Forest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Palatine Forest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 21:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Palatine Forest]] for deletion
Talk:Beka Records

message: Do we need an external link to a photograph of the Beka label? warpozio (talk) 18:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft/Glider task force

message: The list of gliders article contains a large number of red links that would make a good starting point for finding articles that need to be created. Dhaluza 20:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of gliders

message: I've created a project banner at User:Trevor MacInnis/sandbox/Aviation banner. This banner can replace all the various banners used by the various projects, while still providing all the individual uses, such as categorizing articles under specific projects. It is based on the banner user by the Military history project (). An example of it in use is at User talk:Trevor MacInnis/sandbox/Aviation banner, and you can see that by using the various parameters, all aviation articles will be combined under the aviation project at :Category:WikiProject Aviation articles and when tagged properly, in their respective :Category:Rotorcraft task force articles, etc. It will also allows us to introduce other areas of the Wikiproject, such as "collaboration of the month", and take advantage of the larger total number of users throughout the projects. Please comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation#A_Single_Project_Banner_for_use_by_all_aviation_related_projects. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 21:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Single Project Banner for use by all aviation related projects 

message: Could everyone have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Aviation Project Coordinator Proposal, and make any comments there. This is an idea that the Military History project uses, and their production of high quality articles far exceeds ours. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 23:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordination for improved productivity 

message: In an effort to streamline the subprojects of aviation, and given the fact that the Glider task force has four members and a total of 51 articles tagged under its scope and the Gliding project has 7 and 56, I'd like to mere the Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Glider task force and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Gliding into one project, Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Gliding task force. Any objections? - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 19:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections? Redirecting now. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 13:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gliders and Gliding 

message: There is now a new page, Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Maintenance, that lists backlogged areas needing work, articles not covered under the assessment, etc. It is automatically updated by a bot daily. If your looking for something to do, check it out. If there is anything that you would like to see covered, let me know. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 23:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Maintenance
Talk:Dehomag

message: Lankwitz in Berlin.  TICOM SIR 1704, p. 6. scope_creep (talk) 21:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Factory location

message: Does it still exist? Was it bought by another company? What happened to it after the war? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the German language Wikipedia article it was renamed on 29 May 1949 to ,,Internationale Büro-Maschinen Gesellschaft mbH" (i.e. International Business Machines) which is now known as IBM Deutschland Kiore (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Disestabilished?

message: There is a horrifying image of a Rassenamt-SS punched card at . The same image can also be found at https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ibm-and-quot-death-s-calculator-quot-2 (image itself here), where the image source is given as the Bundesarchiv. Can anyone find an online source from the Bundesarchiv itself? What is the copyright status of this image? -- The Anome (talk) 09:19, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punched card image
Talk:French ironclad Dévastation

message: The wikilink for "Devastation Class Battleship" in the info box for this boat takes us to a "Dévastation class battleship" which redirects to "Devastation class battleship." The two pages aren't about the same ships. In fact, one is French and the other British. I doubt either ship enjoys the association.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.19.84.33 (talk) 21:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed--Toddy1 (talk) 20:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad wikilink/redirect
Talk:Program Segment Prefix

message: hi to all 
i am in a kind of hurry , my question is that if we want to get the last command entered in dos, what is the possible way,
for example if we want to calculate the value of factorial such that if last command on Dos was 
C:\>factorial 6
then we calculate the factorial of 6
i am unable to find any way to solve this problem
In some versions of DOS, the last command entered can be found by typing the right-arrow key repeatedly, or by typing the up-arrow key. Typing the up-arrow key a second time displays the previous-to-last command, and a third time displays the command previous to that one, etc.
72.73.192.189 (talk) 20:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Job File Table (JFT) is part of the Program Segment Prefix (PSP) and doesn't really need its own article. The information in the JFT could be added to the PSP article since both articles are already fairly small. Once this is done Job File Table could redirect to the PSP article. Asmpgmr (talk) 18:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you that both articles are rather short at present, however, looking ahead in time a bit I can think of several more pages of useful information to be added to the JFT article and certainly a few dozen pages that could be reasonably added to the PSP article - at present a lot of things are not mentioned at all (or misleading/incorrect) or we are only scratching the surface. The merged JFT stuff could be easily overlooked in an extended PSP article and it would certainly not make it easier to understand the JFT stuff. I think separate articles give us a better chance to explain the concepts and lay out the basic architecture of the operating system. Therefore I would suggest to not merge the articles. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 11:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it is a question of how much information should be added to the article and how much should be left for other references. Asmpgmr (talk) 15:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

text: I removed the incorrect stuff about retrieving command line parameters from the environment. The only thing appended after the environment variables is a string count (always 1) and the fully qualified program name. In fact this is why in Windows 9x COMMAND.COM the CMDLINE environment variable was added. Asmpgmr (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Job File Table (JFT) article into the PSP article
Talk:Dream Theory in Malaya: Fourth World Volume Two

message: Meet Dream Theory in Malaya : Fourth World Volume Two by Jon Hassell .... Gardener of Geda | Message Me.... 20:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First entry
Talk:Judith H. Dobrzynski

message: An expansion of what Dobrzynski covered while at Business Week, since she spent about 20 years there. Time to warm up the ProQuest password... AndreasKQ 21:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Would love to see...
Talk:Highway Patrolman (film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:29, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: El patrullero →  – The film poster appended to this film's infobox confirms that this film was marketed, released and reviewed in the English-speaking world under the title "Highway Patrolman". The main title header of its IMDb entry is also "Highway Patrolman". The article contains eight inline cites to reviews, including one from The New York Times. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 October 2022
Talk:Crypto-Islam

message: If anyone can read Spanish and has got some time, this is quite interesting... "Los últimos de Al-Andalus" (crypto-Muslims in Spain until the 20th Century). Regards, --Asteriontalk 21:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: Qunestion: How can a Sunnite practising Shiism and vice versa be Crypto-Muslims? After all, both are two major denominations in Islam. --124.183.101.164 18:04, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sunnites quietly practising Shiism and vice versa are Crypto-Muslims?
Talk:Rotary saw

message: This page is just plain wrong. It would make sense to not be swayed by the latest marketed name for a new whiz bang tool. A rotary saw is any powered saw that uses a saw blade (as opposed to a SAW BIT !), just because the branding of a tool includes rotation doesn't make it distinct. With time maybe the router could be re-branded as a table saw, but currently (and hopefully logic dictates) the rotarysaw is ANY saw that rotates, and as such every saw should be listed here that fits that description. either take the new branded name psiral saw as a page, or keep it as a rotary tool, which has forlonger been in the common vernacular, denoting a small portable powered implementErlyrisa (talk) 17:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong info

message: This page may better be called "Spiral Bit Saw" since "rotary" saws encompass an extremely wide array of tools, most of which had existed for decades or longer before the introduction of the branded "Roto-Zip" tool. An image would be indispensable to allow visualizing this type of tool.
May I suggest that the page name change be put to a vote ?   I vote for "Spiral Saw". (1) to ensure the distinction from a circular saw; (2) because that is what it is always normally called.   Darkman101 (talk) 21:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Better name?

message: This article says, "A rotary reciprocating saw is a type of saw that spins a cutting implement around a rotary axis, instead of thrusting it along a linear axis."
I don't think that is correct.  I think that an oscillating cast saw, at least, does not spin.  Rather, it vibrates: it turns a small distance in one direction, then reverses and turns an equal distance in the other direction.  This motion is effective at cutting rigid surfaces like orthopedic casts, but ineffective at cutting soft surfaces like skin.  NCdave (talk) 08:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  cast saws
Talk:Sally Miller

message: there is much more quoted text from other source than from wikipedians.....WillC (talk) 18:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some stuff from Bailey, since the article has the weakness you describe. It's really an interesting case, deserving a strong place in American legal history. rewinn (talk) 19:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: no it is not. no it does not. WillC (talk) 20:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For what reason?  This was an important case in LA history, leading directly to the dissolution of that state's Supreme Ct and replacement with a more pro-slavery court. It illuminates a very important aspect to American history of race. rewinn (talk) 20:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: then merge it with that state's court page. WillC (talk) 11:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree with proposed merger. The subject of the article is notable in the history of slavery, slave law, and Louisiana.  Let's see what other editors have to say. Editor WillC  has offered no reason for merger. rewinn (talk) 16:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Editor WillC has not formally proposed a merger. WillC (talk) 00:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added identification of the legal cases, and included it in the categories of United States slavery case law and Freedom suits - may include it in the latter article, as this case is based on different grounds than some, and certainly highlights the ambiguous issues related to ethnic ancestry of slaves in the South. People were uncomfortable because it highlighted the prevalence of interracial relationships resulting in "white" slaves.Parkwells (talk) 17:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  does this entry belong? 

message: AFAIK (and according to Bailey) there are no known actual pictures of this article's subject. If a picture is desirable, perhaps a contemporary photo of the location of this article's notable events, e.g. Belmonti's cafe if the building still exists, or the LA Supreme Ct?  rewinn (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture issue

message: Thus Salomé Müller from Langensoultzbach was in fact born a French citizen, not a German one. --RCS (talk) 10:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for adding that.  We'll have to include it in the article, already dealing with a complex story - a way of showing the persistence of ethnic over national identification in many areas, for good reason, when associated with language, culture, etc.Parkwells (talk) 17:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alsace was French, not German, between 1681 and 1871 

message: I recommend deleting the long quote from the Law Reporter, taken from the Crafts' slave narrative, as it is not dated or otherwise identified.  It is a primary source, as it's a contemporary news account.  There is better material in standard reliable secondary sources, which would be better used for this article, per WIKI Policy on sources. Parkwells (talk) 17:27, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete long quote
Talk:Otto Group

message: Dear Wikipedia-contributors, we're the communications team of the Otto Group and would like to ask for feedback, if it is possible to improve the quality of this article by preparing/uploading a translation of the German Wikipedia article for the Otto Group (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Group)? Looking forward to your feedback, best regards! (Otto Group (talk) 12:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Lufthansa Regional

message: What with most short haul operations being moved to Germanwings, and Eurowings will soon be solely operating for Germanwings, will and does Lufthansa regional still exist? It just seems like Lufthansa CityLine will be operating some routes out of Frankfurt and Munich and Air Dolomiti operating some routes (although some of its' fleet is being retired)--Mark999 (talk) 02:29, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Lufthansa Regional still exist? 