Talk:Cyber-shot

message: Some asshole called firefox man keeps removing any edits I make without reason.- LostTemplar 12 June 2006 8:43 (GMT)
: First, watch your language and no personal attacks please. He is removing your edits because they are incorrect or unneeded. The H-series is not prosumer by most standards. It is important to mention the video of the M-series, as that is its primary marketing feature. "Like" does not need quotes.  Most of all, the new Sony DSLR's will NOT part be part of the Cyber-shot line and not numbered DSC-Axxx! Where'd you see that? 68.184.209.190 06:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment(s)

message: Is every single model of camera notable enough to warrant its own article? Very little is on the main Cyber-shot page as it is now. Isopropyl 02:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Each camera has been given it's own page as in Wikipedia images taken and uploaded often contain Metadata along with the image which states the exact model of the camera eg. "Sony Cybershot P92", therefore each camera model should receive it's own page in order to give the most accurate and most thorough information as possible to the audience of the cybershot article and sub-articles, this is just one advantage to having individual pages for each camera model, along with a plathora of other reasons which someone else may wish to discuss..
Nrlight 06:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: :Image:Cyber-shot logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cyber-shot logo.png

message: :Image:Cyber-shot logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cyber-shot logo.png

message: There are articles on Nikon Coolpix 5000 and scores of other N-pointandshoots, yet the articles on Sony cameras were all replaced with redirects to nothing. Did I miss something? Is Nikon a sacred cow? NVO (talk) 23:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Still I don't get it

message: Isn't this a list? Shouldn't it be moved to List of Cybershot Cameras Warrior4321talk 15:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List? 

message: From the article lead:
:The Cyber-shot range is well known for its proprietary InfoLithium battery pack...
I haven't edited as I'm not 100% certain, but I think I'm right in saying that some Cyber-shots (eg the P series) take standard AA cells. Loganberry (Talk) 11:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batteries 

message: Hello all, I was taking a look at the references on this article and some date to 2007. Especially concerning the models section, I think this should be changed to a more recent source. Cheers, Zalunardo8 (talk) 11:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old References 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cyber-shot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131026072621/http://www.sony.co.uk/hub/geotagging to http://www.sony.co.uk/hub/geotagging
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified