Talk:Humanure

message: Is this a word actually used by people? A trademark of a product sold for fertilizer? Just something that somebody thought was cute? It needs some justification showing it's worthy of an encyclopedia article or it will be speedy-deleted again soon. - DavidWBrooks 00:37, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought so, too, but a quick google search gives 2'910 hits, and even excluding the hits for "The Humanure Handbook", there remain some 1'790. So I guess it might be a legitimate, albeit substubby entry. Lupo 10:47, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Research needed into heavy metal contamination from human feces ?  Come on... If a person ate more than a few micrograms of copper or lead or titanium that person would no longer be contributing much to the non-waste stream.
:Yes, this seems bogus - is there any kind of ref for this? Mark Richards 00:54, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Heavy metal

message: Putting my comment at the bottom of the page, so it's comprensible over time, I  would like to note that I have, per the request above, remove the "stub" notice. Perhaps more can be said on this topic, but the unsigned poster is correct, this is no longer a stub. - DavidWBrooks 19:43, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  no more stub 

message: There was an unreferenced tag on the article, and an anonymous IP contributor recently added a list of about 20 book titles to the article, all but one predating the supposed genesis of the term humanure. I'm guessing somebody copied the bibliography section of some other source. While well-intentioned, this article needs sources that confirm the information in this article; just adding titles without reading the sources doesn't ensure that. I removed the references cited.  -Agyle 02:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I’d like to explain my recent edit in a little more depth. As per the article humanure is not sewage sludge. The safety issues of each in some part differ, specifically in the industrial contaminations often introduced to sewage. The controversies raised by humanure are not necessarily the same as those raised by sewage sludge. listenin 21:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate subjects - Humanure is not sewage sludge 

message: Because Humanure is a "Biological Nutrient' according to the Cradle to Cradle model.  Biological nutrients by definitions can composted or consumed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gheemaker (talk • contribs) 18:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal link added [[Cradle to Cradle]] 

message: I've removed the excess verbiage obviously designed to take this article out of stub status, and I think it should be merged to composting, which is what it really is, other than the name of a book Red58bill (talk) 04:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned up

message: I think the Humanure article would be good to merge with the Compost article, as humanure composting is simply a composting method that deals specifically with human waste.
What do folks think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.251.197 (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merge with Compost article 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Humanure (album) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 02:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress