lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:F-class blimp

message: Shock, U.S. Navy Airships 1915-1962, (1992, 2001) page 34 says ""It is possible the Army's A-1 and the two Navy ships tried a Curtiss 'OX' engine of 90 or 100 hp. records disagree." In his "Army Airships 1908-1942," (2002) page 37 he cites the power plant of the A-1 as "Curtiss OX-5."  In his B-Class section of U.S. Navy Airships 1915-1962 Shock lists the power plant as "Curtiss OX-5 100  horsepower." The power rating of the OX-5 was 90 hp. http://www.enginehistory.org/Curtiss%20OX5.pdf The power of the OXX was 100 hp.
The Naval History and Heritage Command http://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/naval-aviation-history.html has pdf files showing the original Aircraft History Cards for the B Class Airships at http://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/naval-aviation-history/aircraft-history-cards/aircraft-history-card-listing-a-52-through-a-999/bureau-numbers-a-201-to-a-299.html The B Class Bureau Numbers were A-235 through A-250. With the exception of A-249 (B-15) and A-250 (B-16) which were built by the Connecticut Air Corp. the engine listed is the Curtiss OXX (A-249 & A-250 were delivered with Hall Scott engines). The horse power of the OXX is given as 100 hp.
The OXX (aka OXX-6) was an improved OX-5 with two magnetos bored out to give 100 hp. http://airandspace.si.edu/collections/artifact.cfm?object=nasm_A19710916000 The OXX was used widely  by the USN in the Curtiss Models F, FL, & FM, flying boat trainers, early Curtiss F-9s and the Aeromarine 39 & 40 trainers.
While Shock states the engine of the F-1 as "probably Union 6 cylinder" the probability is that the Navy's "Experimental Engine Testing Dirigible" was not only flown in both tractor and pusher configurations, but with Curtiss OXX as well as the Union engine. Mark Lincoln (talk) 16:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  F-1 Engines
Talk:H-class blimp

message: The accident cited at http://www.aviationarchaeology.com/src/1940sB4/1923.htm was one  where a "rip landing" was made. Another was made on 6 October 1923. Shock, James R., U.S. Army Airships, 1908-1942, 2002, Atlantis Productions, Edgewater Florida, , page 60. Obviously the OB-1 was not "Lost" on 28 September 1923. Mark Lincoln (talk) 17:55, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fate of OB-1
Talk:Genoways's yellow bat

message: The article claims that the Genoways's Yellow Bat is only to be found in Mexico. Untrue. i've got two dozen of the little yellow buggers flapping round in my garage. Any idea how to get rid of them? --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Habitat? 

message: I  read they are an endangered species. Too right they are! --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 18:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endangered species? 
Talk:Consequent

message: Ratio reads The numbers A and B are sometimes called terms of the ratio, with A being the antecedent and B being the consequent. --Backinstadiums (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In a ratio A/B 

message: Okie 2603:6081:4C01:E4AC:898E:6E3A:EEFF:66F9 (talk) 16:40, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ur
Talk:Robust yellow bat

message: Consolidated discussion to Talk:Western Sucker-footed Bat#Requested move Apteva (talk) 21:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Despite the fact that a bat can fly they are not actually birds but mamals so that WikiProject does not even apply.--174.95.111.105 (talk) 20:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes—my point was that the proposed capitalization is appropriate for most species, even if you'll find a prominent counterexample with birds. --BDD (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake, I assumed that you mistook a bat for a bird based on the fact that they fly and was concerned that the Bird WikiProject would apply.--174.95.111.105 (talk) 02:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Given the level of support, in the future I will make similar mammal species name change requests as technical (uncontroversial) requests, which will obviate the need for discussion and speed things up a bit. WolfmanSF (talk) 19:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Some editors have expressed an opinion that species names are proper nouns and should be capitalized, although this seems to be a minority view. If I were you, I'd want to see a few more uncontroversial RMs in this field before moving on to technical requests. You could do multiple page moves to process them in batches, at least, as the issues and arguments are likely to be the same. --BDD (talk) 20:46, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Junkers J.I

message: * This article is short, but sweet. Ebuz610 18:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "First all-metal aircraft to enter mass production"
Is it reasonable to call this all-metal, when the rear part of the fuselage was fabric covered? Or is "all metal" defined as the main structure being built of metal? Catsmeat (talk) 10:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: All-metal
Talk:Beta BASIC

message: The article at the moment gives no indication of what versions were released when.  It would be nice if we could find this information and add it as a timeline.
"Combined with the 64-column display" - what does this mean exactly?  BB has a CSIZE command, which enables the character dimensions (and therefore number of rows and columns on the display) to be changed to practically anything.  As of version 3.0 it still defaulted to the standard 8x8.  Did this default change at some point? -- Smjg 20:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions? 

message: At the moment, the only example we have is the screenshot.  And while it nicely shows the indented list format and the 4x8 character size, it doesn't demonstrate a single one of BB's new language features.  It would be nice to have one that does. -- Smjg 21:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The example doesn't do BB justice 
Talk:Los Angeles Tennis Club

message: Is Marlborough High School the same as Marlborough School (Los Angeles, California)? The present link is currently pointing to a disambiguation page. If there is a Marlborough High School as well as a Marlborough School could you possibly add it to the Marlborough (disambiguation) and Marlborough School (disambiguation) pages. Dahliarose 20:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: has been changing information without including verifiable references from reliable sources or explaining, and without discussing on its user talk page.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:06, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced changes 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 01:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Thespesia cubensis

message: On the one hand this species is more commonly placed (either explictly or implicitly) in Thespesia (as in the Wikipedia page for Thespesia); on the other hand it appears that the IUCN Red List uses the old placement in Atkinsia. I suggest a redirect to Thespesia cubensis. (Google Search turns up more references for Atkinsia, but the number for either name is small.)
Citations would include
* J. B. Hutchinson, The Genera of Flowering Plants (1964)
* P. A. Fryxell, The natural history of the cotton tribe (Malvaceae, tribe Gossypieae) (1979)
* Kubitzki & Bayer, Fam. Gen. Vasc. Pl. V (2003)
* NPGS/GRIN
* WikiSpecies
Lavateraguy 18:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy
Talk:Sagittal plane

message: Midsagittal should be merged into the page as a minor point - it's a sagittal plane that cuts through the nose.  There's not enough info for the two to be separate.  WLU 20:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

message: The following paragraph should not be in this page, as it refers to the midsagittal plane only.  Which should be merged. 
Differences between the two halves, assymmetries, are found primarily in the heart and other internal organs, but subtle differences can also be seen in the two halves of the human face. Try holding a pocket mirror with its edge against the center of your own photo, showing one side reflected to make a whole face.
It's also proscriptive with the mirror bit.  WLU 20:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences 

message: The term sagittal is a geomeric term rather than a medical term. Thus a more general Wikipedia article is needed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 12:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restricted context 

message: If I turn my head, then the definition is not fully clear to me. Is it from the front to the back of my head or my body? 
Just from the initial definition I'd say ”body”, but then the “Terminology” section mentions the “sagittal suture”, which would hint for “head”. -- 77.117.3.192 (talk) 09:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  is it head or body? 

message: The article says that Extension and flexion are the movements of limbs relative to the sagittal plane and Abduction and adduction are terms for movements of limbs relative to the coronal plane but what does "relative" mean? Along, parallel and perpendicular to are all relationships that a movement can have with a plane. Which relative is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.1.159 (talk) 00:11, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That does seem awkward and the opposite of what I would think is logical. If a movement is flexion or extension, the body part moves away from (perpendicular to) the coronal plane while in abduction or adduction, movement is away from (perpendicular to) the sagittal plane. As currently written, Citation needed! Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 03:05, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

text: Perhaps the author meant to say that flexion/extension is along (parallel to) the sagittal plane and abduction/adduction is along (parallel to) the coronal plane? Thanks, Wordreader (talk) 03:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Relative" is unclear 

message: See also - Distal plane? As I understand it, proximal (closer to the head) and distal (farther from the head) are relative directions or contexts, not cutting planes. Examples: "The feet are distal to the hands." -or- "The neck is proximal to the waist." Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 03:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also... 

message: It took a long time before i discovered the much too thin brace and realized the reason why there's no black plane in the illustration... --Espoo (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomprehensible illustration
Talk:James Paris Lee

message: Why say he is american and canadian, when he was born in scotland? Therefore he is british or scottish. what makes him american or canadian at all? Don't nick our inventors god dam it. History is all we have left.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.145.152.13 (talk) 19:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bothers me 

message: The article currently states: 
"...no Lee rifle ever carried more than ten rounds (with the exception of the so-called "trench" magazines from the times of WWI, designed for 20 rounds)..."
...however I believe the Ishapore 2A1 was/is commonly fitted with a 12 round magazine. Is there any reason not to mention this, given it is still based on the original design? BH530481 (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box magazine capacity.
Talk:James Pryde

message: I'd like to start expanding this article. Unless there is any reason not to, I'd like to add an Infobox artist, improve the references, convert bare links to full citations and so on. Would anyone object if I changed the referencing system to list-defined at the same time? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox, references
Talk:Heartsdales

message: Is the use of covers for each record clear of CV? RJFJR 20:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Luis Hernando Gómez

message: There's some confusion in the first section over what prosecutors claim Gomez was doing in the early 1990s - first he's pumping gas in 1991, then managing a cartel in 1990 Edjack 10:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His income rose, I guess he was managing but did not report income until the next year, which kind of makes sense. --SevenOfDiamonds 13:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Roosevelt I

message: I'd think that "1885" picture would be somewhat later than that; FDR does not appear to be aged three.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.28.151 (talk) 03:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the caption to read 1895, which would make FDR 13 at the time (he looks a little young for 13, but he was a late bloomer).  I am looking to determine the exact date.  Another issue: The page had James' middle name as Delano.  That was his second wife's maiden name.  If memory serves, James didn't have a middle name, but again I will verify.THD3 (talk) 13:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple issues with article

message: James Roosevelt, Sr. and Rebecca Howland Roosevelt's only son was named James Roosevelt Roosevelt.  He was nicknamed "Rosey".  James Roosevelt, Sr's estate went to his wife Sara Delano Roosevelt, who died on September 7, 1941. FDR was not old enough to own property,  He was shy of 18 years old, having been born on January 30, 1882.  At the time of her death, her estate passed to FDR, their only child  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.31.176 (talk) 03:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source for that? Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Estate

message: Article says: “...he married his second cousin, Rebecca Brien Howland...”
I had always understood that James Roosevelt had married his mother’s first cousin, which would be his first cousin once removed, not second cousin. But it never hurts to recheck. 
Sure enough, Gardiner Greene “G. G.” Howland and Susan Howland were siblings. G.G.’s daughter Rebecca Brien Howland and Susan’s daughter Mary Aspinwall were first cousins. Rebecca was James’ wife and Mary was James’ mother, so he did indeed marry his mother’s first cousin.
It seems unlikely a published book on Roosevelt genealogy would mistake a first cousin once removed for a second cousin, so it would have to be whoever wrote this article that made the mistake. 71.184.87.187 (talk) 22:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The book describes Rebecca as "a daughter of his mother's first cousin". Larry Hockett (Talk) 04:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  not second cousin
Talk:List of aircraft of the Royal Flying Corps

message: Is it intended to differentiate between aircraft operated by the RFC and the RNAS, e.g. by putting the operator(s) in brackets after the aircraft name, or by having two sections in the article or even by having two separate articles? I tnink my preference would be for the first option. Were there any other operators? --TraceyR 14:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! I misunderstood the comment that the RFC list "may contain RNAS aircraft"! --TraceyR 18:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC/RNAS aircraft 

message: There are several one-off types (like the B.E.1 and S.E.4) that were prototypes tested at the Royal Aircraft Factory, but as far as I know never taken on to RFC charge. Similarly the "prototypes" list should be restricted to prototype aircraft (like the S.E.2) that were used by a squadron. Is this even a case of confusion between RAF (=Royal Aircraft Factory) and RAF (=Royal Air Force)?? In any case, few of the items currently on the (prototypes) list would meet that one.
Before I charge in and take an axe to the list - is this the consensus - or do we mean something like "all British aircraft of the period, whether they were officially RFC property or not"?
:This list was originally broken off as a section in the RAF list to better recognise the Royal Flying Corps. It has not really had a good clean-up since with ad-hoc additions. No objection to you having a go but suggest it should really only show aircraft that entered service with the RFC (even if just one aircraft), dont think one of prototypes that did not enter service should be added. Dont agree it should be all British aircraft of the period as that could be misleading as this is the RFC list.  MilborneOne (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This list seems to contain items added at random
Talk:James Sample (conductor)

message: With no inline references and no photo, I find this article to be START class at best.  I disagree with the "B" class given to this article by the WP Bio which I am also a member.  C. Williams (talk) 02:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:44, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B class?
Talk:James Stanley Freeman

message: I am the great-grandson of James Stanley Freeman.  This article contains erroneous information.
While he was both wealthy and broke several times during his life, I cannot state with certainty that he was ever a millionaire.  But he did not make money in the stock market: he made money mostly through real estate and mineral rights investments.
James Stanley Freeman and his wife Willie Lee Shepherd had three sons:
James Shepherd Freeman (my grandfather)
Lucius Gaines Freeman
William Stanley Freeman
How do I get this mis-information corrected?
James Shepherd Freeman III  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.179.28.138 (talk) 03:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Music venues in the United States

message: This category does not include our nation's capital, Washington D.C.  Needless to say, there are more than a few important music venues in this city and it would be great if this category reflected that.  While an enormous fan of wikipedia I've never done much by the way of editing, so please excuse me if I did anything incorrectly here.  Triplesb 20:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if such a category exists, but if not, you could always create :Category:Music venues in Washington, D.C.. Then, place the category on the relevant articles (if they exist). It's not so much editing this page, as it is finding the articles and placing them in a category for D.C. - auburnpilot talk 23:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much for the informative and timely response.  Upon following your advice however, I realized the hierarchy that was in place here.  I didn't initially see that nightclubs were a whole subcategory of music venues, as I had intended on adding what I now see are categorized as nightclubs.  I will keep my eyes out though for anything in Washington, D.C. that might possibly fit into this category without classifying as a concert hall, indoor arena, nightclub, or opera house.  Thanks again for the help!  Triplesb 21:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James T. Licavoli

message: Upon reading the birth date of James (Aug. 18, 1904) and his "brother" Thomas (February 9, 1904) is raises the question if James was a premature baby because the span between his birth and that of Thomas is only six months and eighteen days.
Another speculative thought is that perhaps, James and Thomas had two different mothers, which would really make them step-brothers or half-brothers (if James was illegitimate).
Musicwriter (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable birth date
Talk:Don't-care term

message: I'm disappointed with this edit after you had been reverted once.  Yes, there was an inconsistency in style, but you chose to add citation templates when two out of the three citations did not use them.  The third citation came with a merge from another article on an only tangentially related topic.  So essentially the only references in this article directly on this topic were inserted by me with a different style.  Calling on CITEVAR to justify your action is stretching it. SpinningSpark 08:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation style 

message: It might be interesting to determine the origin of the terms "don't care" and "can't happen". So far, I could not find a source earlier than Maurice Karnaugh's 1953 paper using the term "don't care" and the 1968/1969 article and book source by Noel Malcolm Morris using the term "can't happen", so it is possible that they coined these terms. In the 1950s, a variety of other terms was in use as well by various authors.
If you run into earlier publications using these terms, please add them to the article (or report them here). Thanks. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 11:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of the terms "Don't care" and "Can't happen"
Talk:Cola suboppositifolia

message: How is this kola nut species threatened by AIDS?--Bpsullivan (talk) 02:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Colona poilanei

message: Set-up genus page - but needs input from a good botanist! Roy Bateman (talk) 07:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Fallacies of illicit transference

message: W. Kent Wilson in The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy classifies "fallacies of distribution" as those pertaining to the distribution rules in syllogisms: undistributed middle, illicit major, illicit minor. It might be worth noting the ambiguity. —Mrwojo (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another meaning 

message: I wonder if there isn't also a "Fallacy of illicit transference", in that the fallacy of composition and the fallacy of division can be used simultaneously, defining the instance of the class as representative of the class, and the class as definitive (?) of each and every instance. See Drawing Hands for a visual metaphor of the process I'm trying to describe.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheLastWordSword (talk • contribs) 16:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A third fallacy
Talk:Jan Appel

message: Overall parts of the article read like an essay on a "fighter for the good cause" with various formulations not really appropriate for an encyclopedia. The given sources appear somewhat biased as well.--Kmhkmh (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The way that the SPD is described as "reactionary" (!) and the USPD as "centrist" (!) seems to confirm that this article was written by some sectarian Communist. 83.226.206.82 (talk) 18:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Style and POV

message: This article is mostly a verbatim copy of Jan Appel: A Revolutionary Has Died,
published in 1985 in the International Review, a quarterly of the International Communist Current.
Rather than attempt a re-write based on a large, unsourced, piece of propaganda, I propose to scrap the copied text and start a good article from scratch. Superp (talk) 10:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support a complete rewrite (possibly much shorter even) based on better suited more reputable sources. It looks the original author has been inactive for years and I'm not really a stakeholder here, I was just commenting when passing by. So you probably have a free hand in overhauling the article anyhow.--Kmhkmh (talk) 11:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-Paste of propaganda 

message: Jan Appel was born on Friday, the 22nd August 1890. Source: draft of a letter by Lea Berreklouw to Raad van Arbeid (in Maastricht and in Nijmegen), the A.B.P and the Uitkeringsraad, conerning the death of Jan Appel, Yospangsada (talk) 09:11, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Date of birth'''