lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Milonga (music)

message: milonga, tango etc,,, i mean music of argentina and uruguay has it´s roots in european and african dance, rhythm and style. It´s something one cannot deny.It is not a pure african dance and style nor is it a pure european dance but a mixture of the two not forgetting native american influences. I even heard the there some argentinas denying the existance of africans in argentina which is beyond funny. You guys are just making yourselfs not beleivable ......as you´re desperately trying to live in denial of many facts regarding your history. Argentinan art and culture is a mixed culture, one cannot only call it argentinan as it also has european, african and native american influences.... so please stop being paranoid and read your history very very well. Did you know that the first president of Argentina was black? i just find it ironical.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soni82 (talk • contribs) 06:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a mistake to say that the tango and milonga have no Africa roots. Robert Farris Thompson's 2005 book (for one example) on the Tango is filled with instances linking Tango's style, musical and lyrical elements back to Africa. The tango is a confluence of African, Spanish, other European and Andean elements, it is a mistake to remove Africa from  this list. - AKeen 15:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I also expected to see Piazzola in the list.
--88.115.160.133 (talk) 20:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piazzola 

message: This article relies entirely on English-language sources which are not shown to be trustworthy.  For a more mainstream account, have a glance at the Spanish Wikipedia article (even you only read it in Google translation) and be prepared to be startled.     Ttocserp 11:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: This article lacks good sources

message: The introduction first says that the fouth beat i weakened, then it that milonga is syncopated giving a list of prominent beats that includes the fourth beat, what's the case?150.227.15.253 (talk) 19:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The fourth beat
Talk:Geology of Europe

message: ===Components===
Stub to be replaced by future article; first, before writing anything, I'll sketch what my memory says: regarding Europe as a continent is geologically justifyable: if we reverse our mental E. Mainland vs. Scandinavia dichotomy to say that Scandinavia is the "real mainland" and the rest of Europe fragments collected from elsewhere. If my remembrance is correct, Europe consist of the
*the Baltica continent - Scandinavia, Balticum, Russia, and Northern Poland/Germany,
*Avalonian fragments - England, Ireland, Denmark (??), Netherlands, Northern Germany, etc.,
*Laurentian (North American) fragments - Western Norway and Scotland,
*Gondwana Fragments - Spain, Italy??, Malta, possibly belonging to the Cimmerian Arc,
*Neo-Tethys Ocean floor - the Pyrenees/Alps/Appenines/Balcan Alps/Carpatian complex,
*The Turkey part of the Cimmerian Arc originating from Gondwana,
Qaþ Rursus 13:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixing

message: Stub to be replaced by future article; first, before writing anything, I'll sketch what my memory says: regarding Europe as a continent is geologically justifyable: if we reverse our mental E. Mainland vs. Scandinavia dichotomy to say that Scandinavia is the "real mainland" and the rest of Europe fragments collected from elsewhere. If my remembrance is correct, Europe consist of the
*the Baltica continent - Scandinavia, Balticum, Russia, and Northern Poland/Germany,
*Avalonian fragments - England, Ireland, Denmark (??), Netherlands, Northern Germany, etc.,
*Laurentian (North American) fragments - Western Norway and Scotland,
*Gondwana Fragments - Spain, Italy??, Malta, possibly belonging to the Cimmerian Arc,
*Neo-Tethys Ocean floor - the Pyrenees/Alps/Appenines/Balcan Alps/Carpatian complex,
*The Turkey part of the Cimmerian Arc originating from Gondwana,
Qaþ Rursus 13:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Components

message: This article need to conform more closely with modern plate tectonics.  Discussion of a "Baltic continent" is absurd in that context.  The modern plate is the Eurasian Plate.  The Baltic "continent" is presently simply a crustal block or craton that is part of this modern day plate, as well as part of the continent of Eurasia.
I propose that this article concentrate on topographic features (and perhaps sedimentary features) with some discussion of tectonics, but with a link to the Eurasian Plate article as the main article on this aspect of European geology. Tmangray (talk) 16:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More Tectonics
Talk:Objective correlative

message: The format of the article was terrible, so I've cleaned it up and clarified the concepts and informational progression, but greater literary explanation is needed concerning the "Theory of Objective Correlative" section, preferably submitted by an editor with a more erudite knowledge on the concept.
Exemplar sententia 08:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikification 

message: I've removed the following example from the article:
(begin removed example)
"Archibald Macleish" does this effectively in his poem "Ars Poetica" in these lines:
      For all the history of grief
      An empty doorway and a maple leaf
    
                  . . .
      For love
      The leaning grasses and two lights above the sea
(end removed text) ... this looks like original research ... and I'm not convinced that this is really what Eliot is talking about (they seem more like examples of deep image at least as Robert Bly conceived it) ... could we have some cited material on objective correlative? Stumps 13:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Macleish example

message: The article should include, fairly early on, some concrete examples of objective correlatives in literature. Remember Wikipedia is for the general public, it's not supposed to be an encoded echo-chamber for academics.
Sean7phil (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Should Include, Fairly Early On, Some Concrete Examples of Objective Correlatives in Literature 

message: I added a short sentence to the beginning of the quote by Washington Allston. It is silly to present the quote without it... the line the quote previously began with refers to a common vegetable, but you have no way of knowing that without the preceding line, which I've now inserted.
Chicopac (talk) 19:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote by Washington Allston
Talk:Strategy of the Roman military

message: The image under the Grand Strategy section reads for 'Operational Strategy': 'within tactical capabilities and costraints', and for 'Tactics': '...for acheiving of operational goals...'. 177.40.168.191 (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typos on 'Grand Strategy' image 

message: A good overall structure. There is enough here to do a full-blown stand-alone article on Roman grand strategy, particularly in the later stages of the empire-- the struggles with the Germanics, the fortifications, the Rhine frontier, the Pratorian Guard, weak emperors, the rise of the cavalry, the Eastern frontier, the internal turmoil, battles with Atilla, etc. etc. Enriquecardova 20:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, the article as it stands I wrote just because as I've been trying to figure out the coverage of all the articles on the roman military and impose some kind of structure on it I was really surpirsed to find nothing on its strategy and only a little on its tactics (confined to infantry tactics alone). The article is still very much in early stages. Topics like the limes and others you mention obviously deserve pretty huge coverage since this is a large area, I just hadn't had time to expand it yet. Im fairly new to wikipedia and find that I get pulled into trying to improve far too many articles - I need to learn to focus on really improving just one or two! I will be doing further work on this article but obviously if you or anyone else are able and have time to contribute thena ll the better :-) - PocklingtonDan 22:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Time, time the old story. On the tactics page the discussion is confined to the demise of the infantry but there is a whole other "big picture" side to it. Well keep up the good work! Enriquecardova 06:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with such an article is that it covers a period of a millenia, this is basically a description of the Roman Army of the Late Republic-Early Empire, the Pre-Marian Roman Army and the Catpharacti of the late Empire, although sharing the same lineage and similarities are rather different animals.Koonan the almost civilised 16:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A good overall structure 

message: The only citation is for a quote. Anything else? 68.173.113.106 (talk) 22:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article doesn't cite enough sources
Talk:Yaesu (brand)

message: Articles for several Yaesu handhelds have been listed for deletion: VX-2R, VX-3R, VX-5R, VX-6R, VX-7R, VX-8R.  Please see AFD here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaesu VX-2R.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 13:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Yaesu FT-290R Dsergeant (talk) 17:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yaesu FT-60, Yaesu FT-2900R, Yaesu FT-290R, Yaesu FT-221, and Yaesu FRG-7700 were all PRODed.  I've removed the prod, but I expect them to be listed as AfD soon.  We need to add references to these articles to save them asap.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 16:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was able to find references for the VX series articles, which led to those articles being merged to Yaesu VX series.  The Yaesu FT-1000MP article is also up for deletion and requires references.  Thanks.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 19:09, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several articles listed for deletion
Talk:Central Bank of Malaysia

message: Rumors about the new Governor being Nor Shamsiah is not fact. Removed such from infobox.   -   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikrashid (talk • contribs) 20:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Governor 

message: Write-up on the forex play and reserves management was overly reliant on one book by Millman (1995). Suggest edit to be more balanced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikrashid (talk • contribs) 09:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: To the IP shifting anon who keeps removing this category.  Please explain why you think this category should be removed from this and the other Malaysian bank articles. - TexasAndroid 13:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banks of Malaysia category 

message: The article had stated that the BNM "is the Malaysian central bank or Malaysian Federal Reserve."  This is both too US-centric and too much of a dumbing down for American readers.  If anyone doesn't know what a central bank is, they can click the link and quickly see the Federal Reserve listed as a prominent example.  I've gone ahead and removed the Fed reference from the intro paragraph. -Helvetica (talk) 07:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Malaysian Federal Reserve." 
Talk:11th Gorkha Rifles

message: I have checked this page against , and found that at least the "war cry" information is an obvious copy/paste in violation of copyright. I have reverted to a version previoius to this additon (December 6). --Alvestrand 16:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation material removed 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:123rd Outram's Rifles

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.    --dashiellx (talk) 18:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: This link in famous soldiers is wrong it would seem
Acmthompson (talk) 16:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muhammad Zaman
Talk:1st Gorkha Rifles (The Malaun Regiment)

message: The presentation, as opposed to the content, of this article, is problematic. "Gorkha Rifles" indicates a regiment of India (Bharat), from 1947 to the present. Pre-1947,the spelling was "Gurkha" (although orginally, a third spelling, viz.
"Goorkha" could also seen). It is anachronistic and therefore incorrect to have any regiment entitled "Gorkha" appearing in a list of units of the imperial Indian Army. A disambiguation page would solve this.
The style "1st Gurkha Rifles" would then appear under the British list, but would connect to 1 Gorkha Rifles, to indicate the continuity of the tradition. Within the article itself, the sections relating to the pre-1947 unit should be spelled "Gurkha", and sections relating post-Independence should be spelled "Gorkha". Equally, the Victorian spelling (Goorkha)should be used where this was correct. The (reason for the)spelling of the ethnic group that lives in Nepal is (theoretically, though not in practice)independent of the style for the military units, whether the current British Gurkhas, the current Indian Gorkhas, or the Gurkhas (formerly Goorkhas) of the Indian Army of the undivided 'British India'.Protozoon (talk) 20:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I believe that this article could be improved up to a B class standard by addressing the following:
* Referencing: for a successful B class review, the article requires at least one in line citation per paragraph (more if multiple sources are used, or multiple contestable assertions are made);
* Coverage: currently the Interwar and Post Independence sections are lacking in information, these need to be expanded (particularly the Post Independence section);
* Supporting materials: the article passes the B class criteria by virtue of the infobox, but adding some images would help improve it even more.
I have done some work on the article, but don't have many sources so I have only been able to add some general citations. Some of the more involved information in the First and Second World War sections is almost completely without citations. If anyone has access to a Regimental history that can be cited, that would be a good improvement. Anyway, I hope this helps. — AustralianRupert (talk) 06:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible improvements
Talk:Bidiagonal matrix

message: This whole article needs to change. Firstly, in general, people usually regard a bidiagonal matrix as one with entries only on the diagonal and superdiagonal (sometimes only the diagonal and subdiagonal) in which case it is not symmetric. It also seems inappropriate to have the article revolving around LAPACK rather than the actual mathematical definition!
If there are no objections, I will rewrite this in the next few days. (I will leave references to LAPACK intact, however they will be ancillary to the main article.)
Dan Pope 13:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:4th Gorkha Rifles

message: Just to alert editors concerned with the Fourth Gorkha Rifles that there is a lot of unencyclopedic fluff which has no place in a proper encyclopedia and would be shortly be cut out. Informing in advance in good faith should someone wish to discuss about it. AshLin (talk) 13:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopaedic fluff
Talk:Rebecca Eckler

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Recognizing AspasiaLeonidas as a new account, I think it may be beneficial to read Wikipedia's policy concerning civility.
Concerning AspasiaLeonidas's recent edit, I've made a few changes and thought it might be best to discuss my reasoning.
The information that Eckler is "often derided" is, I feel, rendered superfluous gfiven the Jeffrey Simpson quote which follows. I have appended a citation request to the Simpson quote.
Unless the intent is to encourage judgement, I'm not certain what purpose is being served by adding "By her own admission" to information about the conception of her child. I have removed these four words.
The claim that Eckler has yet to find legal counsel to pursue action against the makers of Knocked Up is contradicted by the article she wrote for Maclean's. The sentence in which this claim is made has been removed.
Although I can't for the life of me see much relevance in the sentence concerning "mommy blogs" and positive reviews, I've let the sentence be. I encourage discussion on this matter.
I have adjusted the reference to Eckler's The Globe and Mail "Mommy Blog" to reflect the fact that the series was not a promotional vehicle. The link to the blog has not been restored as it must be purchased and therefore runs counter to Wikipedia's policy concerning external links.
I have restored the sentence dealing with Eckler's blog and the parody blog entitled NineGramBrain. However, I have not restored the link to the latter as third party blogs run counter to Wikipedia's verifiability guidelines. A tricky one this. Again, I encourage discussion. Victoriagirl 03:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing and civility

message: *Should a link to the "Knocked Up" legal filing be added? Is it relevant? See here:  Canuckle 00:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it relevant. Victoriagirl 16:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it, had second thoughts, looked at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Well known public figures which advises against court documents for bios, undid it and added it to the movie site's controversy section. Canuckle 16:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: court papers
Talk:Jurong Lake

message: Please note that as of this version, the Channel NewsAsia refs are all down. It seems they also updated the robots.txt so that the archives aren't available either. More references are needed here and it would be helpful is someone can find the originals. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I will see if I can find other sources as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channel NewsAsia references 

message: Most people mention the depths of their lakes. 2400:79E0:8041:2274:17D0:4B51:A265:9B96 (talk) 10:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depth
Talk:MSF

message: A Students’ Movement based on values....[snip] --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sameervp (talk • contribs) 13:57, 21 November 2006 
:I have snipped the above comment - it seemed out of place having a whole article posted here. I will add a link to Muslim Students Federation to the disambiguation page.--Commander Keane (talk) 07:16, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muslim Students Federation.
Talk:List of named matrices/to do

message: Open tasks
*Decide section headers here
*Sort out duplicates; add alternative names
*Other matrix-related terms and definitions — this is an arbitrary mess; was the result of separating out terms already there. Badly needs expansion.
*Write a few dozen new matrix articles to facilitate the below (!)
*We need the following matrices added (more to follow as I have time/find them)
— Homogeneous transformation matrix — primitive matrix — stable matrix (relates to stability matrix?)
— Congruent matrices — Ill-conditioned matrix — mass matrix — modal matrix — stiffness matrix
— transfer function matrix — Stieltjes matrix 
— persymmetric matrix (careful! this is defined differently by different people)
— orthosymmetric matrix (same as persym. ?)
— monotone matrix — hypercompanion matrix — bidiagonal matrix — bisymmetric matrix — derogatory matrix
— Schur matrix? — Self-adjoint matrix? — Semi-simple matrix? — Monodromy matrix
— Alexander matrix — (-1,0,1)-matrix — (-1,1)-matrix — Bisymmetric matrix — Bohr matrix
— C-matrix — Characteristic matrix — Clement matrix — Completely positive Matrix
— Complex matrix — Conjugate matrix — Doubly nonnegative matrix
— Elementary matrix operations — Equitable matrix? — 
— Exponential matrix (?) — Fibonacci matrix — Fibonacci Q-matrix — Fourier matrix
— Frobenius matrix — Game matrix (same as payoff matrix?) — Gordon matrix — H-matrix
— Conference matrix — Dispersion matrix (same as covariance matrix)
— Reciprocal matrix - A=(aij) with aji=1/aij. Mentioned by Saaty, TL, Eur J Operation Research 48(1990) 9.
Completed tasks
* Hyphen confusion
:* Made matrix descriptions consistent (of form "Xxx matrix — a matrix ..."); Added Copositive matrix and Stieltjes matrix to list (no articles yet)
:* Wrote articles for Hollow matrix, Euclidean distance matrix and added these to list.Dan Pope 02:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * Added sections for matrices used in Graph theory, and in Statistics. Dan Pope 18:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Magnetic quantum number

message: Made by / Shady Ali  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.234.63.134 (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here "m" is taken as "ml", whereas in the Wikipedia page "Magnetic moment" m is taken as "mj", with different meanings. Please reach an agreement between the two pages, or use the unambiguous notation ml, mj respectively.Grausvictor (talk) 16:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction paragraph, Derivation paragraph, and anywhere 

message: i feel like this should be specified in the introductory paragraph, a lot of my classmates didn't get this. 24.132.242.170 (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  the magnetic quantum number is always an integer 

message: Spin quantum number values Elsy saju (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry 

message: The article says: complete and unique quantum state which doesn't seem quite right. Since a linear combination of states is also a solution of the appropriate equation, one can choose a different basis for a just-as-valid quantum state. This is especially important if a different basis is more visual. The p orbitals are commonly described with the x, y, and z basis, not the ones with unique m_l values. Gah4 (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  '' complete and unique quantum state ''
Talk:Saccharum spontaneum

message: hi myself pratap shankar 
i am interesting to do work on the 
sugar cane so any person or scientist or worker which can help 
me can contact on Mob. [removed]
or on mail:- [removed]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.135.196.58 (talk • contribs) 14:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: undated
Template talk:Municipalities of Serbia

message: I think the template is too big; as I get it, the  is collapsed by default only if there are at least two navigation templates next to one another. should we split it into three (Central Serbia/Vojvodina/Kosovo), like e.g. ? In this way, it would still be conveniently at the bottom but occupy much less space. Duja► 14:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, what the heck; I was bold. Duja► 15:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too big

message: I took out the "Kosovo" portion from this template because of the partial recognition of its recent independence declaration.  —  Rickyrab | Talk 00:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[2008 Kosovo declaration of independence]]

message: Mapa se vidi u šablonu, ali ne i u člancima u koje je šablon postavljen. jel može neko to da sredi? 212.69.3.23 (talk) 20:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mapa opština Vojvodine

message: I removed the Template:Kosovo municipalities, because it is confusing. We need to clean up the municipalities, and disambiguate them. 
Use a different template, thanks,
mike  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MdupontBot (talk • contribs) 09:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed kosovo