Talk:Hamzah bin Hussein

message: According to the article, "His Royal Highness Prince Hamzah ibn Al Hussein is the 43rd generation direct descendent of the Prophet Mohammad."  Could we please have some proof of that?   John Paul Parks (talk) 00:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof of Genealogy Needed

message: It seems to be a widespread rumour, but please don't reinsert that he is divorced without confirmation from a reliable source (i.e. not an internet forum or blog). Fences&Windows 01:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The divorce is impossible to verify as the Jordanian court never anounces divorces. We are in a difficult situation; it is absolutely clear that they are divorced, yet we don't have a reliable reference confirming that. We only have a number of reliable references that hint at their divorce (such as ignoring Noor's existence and only mentioning their daughter in articles about Hamzah). Surtsicna (talk) 08:14, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Divorce rumour

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Hamzah bin Hussein. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.petranews.gov.jo/nepras/2014/Jul/06/7000.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I clearified few points in the introduction, namely :
- the current King's name / article. People coming to this article don't necessarily have sufficient knowledge on the Jordan Royal family.
- on the 2004 rescind, to who it benefited.
It would be good to add some further context on this 2004 thing. Was this adjustment unusual and controversial, or expected and due ? In nearby Saudi, succession line is primarily horizontal, and not from father to son. In most places it's from father to son. I edited the introduction so it sounds more normal. Yug (talk) 15:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: FactStraight, wikipedia is based on every one adding humble stones, including rewording things up. I would appreciate not having to go into an edit war for such trivial readability improvement / edit. Cheer. --Yug (talk) 15:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I, too, do not wish to engage in edit warring. But edits must not only be accurate, they need also to be clear. This edit is so poorly worded that I am not sure what you are trying to say, and the reason for the change you want needs to be explicit. Saying it is less "polemical" assumes that the original wording is so, and that you have improved the wording. I don't see either as evident. Please try again. FactStraight (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The current, contextless intro sounds like a coup occurred to remove Hamzah from the line. The writing makes time loops, introducing the new King in 2004 rather than 1999. Your blank reverts discard the request for improvements without addressing them. I'am pretty sure you can as other editors on this site improve upon rather than revert blindly. --Yug (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: He renounced his title recently, but in a published letter the King rejects this and says only he can grant and remove titles. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/05/19/abdullah-hamzah-jordan-house-arrest/
Of course, normally I'd respect an individual's choice as to his name. But this is in a sense a legal and even political question, and under Jordanian law perhaps the King is correct? I'm not a monarchist and I take no sides here, but maybe he should still be called Prince Hamza.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.226.169 (talk) 17:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Naravno da je još uvijek princ ,kao sin i brat kralja , on to mora po zakonu poštovati ..... Ako kralj ne kaže drugačije 188.129.78.56 (talk) 15:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: His Title: Is he still a Prince?

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Prince Hashim bin Hussein which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 20:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress