Talk:Scattered disc

message: Congratulations to every one who contributed to making this article FA along with 16 other solar system topics. I have been wanting to see this article become FA for a while now... Celtic Muffin&Co. (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA status! 

message: The caption in the illustration of scattered-vs-resonant-vs-classical TNOs defines KBO/Plutoids as 5:2 resonance, the article defines them as 3:2. I assume the caption is just a typo, but am not sure enough to risk changing it. -- PaulxSA (talk) 00:21, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out.  It is correct, but I can see why someone could be mislead by the wording.  I linked 5:2 resonant to Resonant trans-Neptunian object.  All plutinos are in a 3:2 resonance, but there are many other resonances. -- Kheider (talk) 01:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Scattered disc#Subdivisions of trans-Neptunian space|Subdivisions of trans-Neptunian space]] 

message: Congratulations to election to Featured article! ... said: Rursus (mbork³) 07:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured!

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Scattered disc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050921034710/http://www.space.com:80/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/centaur_disc_991111.html to http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/centaur_disc_991111.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Scattered disc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20061012062457/http://www.ciw.edu/sheppard/pub/Sheppard06smallbodies.pdf to http://www.ciw.edu/sheppard/pub/Sheppard06smallbodies.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100818145946/http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~buie/kbo/astrom/04VN112.html to http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~buie/kbo/astrom/04VN112.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://astropolis.pl/index.php?app=core
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Minor Planet Center has changed what they include in the centaur and scattered disk objects list. For semimajor axes beyond 50 AU they are including only the objects with perihelia less than 39 AU. From 41-48 AU they are including those with eccentricity greater than 0.25  including resonant objects. Between 40-41 AU and then below 39 AU they include most but not quite all. The objects with semimajor axes greater than 1000 AU are missing. Perhaps this is a work in progress. Agmartin (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh god, can the IAU do anything without making our lives more difficult? Serendipodous 22:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Planet Center  

message: The first paragraph is missing citations. Thank you!--Geowissenschaftlerin (talk) 10:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations missing in the first paragraph