lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kurt Student

message: Kurt Student did not rescue Mussolini from Gran Sasso.  SS Obersturmbahnfuherer Otto Skorzeny spearheaded the rescue.
:::(read: 'Obersturmbannführer' or 'Obersturmbannfuehrer' instead of 'Obersturmbahnfuherer' --Wolf4 (talk) 14:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: (read: 'Fallschirmjäger' or 'Fallschirmjaeger' instead of 'fallschrimjager' --Wolf4 (talk) 14:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The German WP says he was born in Birkholz, presumably the one in the Province of Saxony, now part of Saxony-Anhalt. This link says he was born in Birkholz, :de:Landkreis Züllichau-Schwiebus, part of the Province of Brandenburg. This book mentions Birkholz, Brandenburg (East Prussia); possibly a reference to Ushakovo? Olessi (talk) 07:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The book "Behind Enemy Lines" has a detailed description of the sniper shooting of two German Officers on a bridge near Rotterdamn by Dutch Corporal Ernst van der Veen, one officer purportedly being General Student. It is claimed that Hitler ordered the bombing of Rotterdam in retaliation. 122.57.24.148 (talk) 13:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wounded in Holland 

message: The entire transcript of the Student's order is not needed. It should be included in the articles actually concerning the war crimes committed on Crete in 1941: Massacre of Kondomari, Razing of Kandanos, Alikianos executions
His actual order read:Beevor 1991, p. 122.
 Meeepmep (talk) 20:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevertheless, it seems the article is wrong to say that Student was ever charged with these massacres, let alone acquitted on the evidence of Brigadier Inglis. That did not happen. Student's trial at the British military court at Luneburg on 6-10 May 1946 related solely to mistreatment and murders of British PoWs. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c27375/pdf/ It may be that matters involving Greek civilians were beyond the court's remit. Franz-Peter Weixler, the Reich war correspondent who took the chilling photographs of the Kondomari massacre, had already provided the photographs and written testimony to the international court at Nuremberg for the prosecution of Hermann Goering, who had seemingly ordered Student to carry out such 'reprisals'. https://neoskosmos.com/en/2018/10/12/features/remembering-the-kondomari-massacre/ There might have been an issue in that the Luneburg court could not pre-empt or prejudice the final ruling of the Nuremberg court. But at any rate Student was never charged in that connection. Inglis gave evidence for the defence on the fourth and fifth charges (related to the bombing of No.7 General Hospital at Galatos on 24 May 1941 and the use of British PoWs, staff and patients of the hospital, as a 'screen' for a German attack on that date), and Student was acquitted, but this had nothing to do with the massacres of civilians. Khamba Tendal (talk) 18:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reprisal order
Talk:Valie Export

message: Couple notes.
-"Touch Cinema" is a compromise translation; I've also seen it translated as "Tap and Touch Cinema", but this appears to be a transliteration rather than a translation. Until someone with a good grasp on both languages comes along to translate "tappen" based on the context, I vote we leave it as "Touch Cinema".
-Export mentions the significance of the audience's visibility in an interview in "RE/Search #13: Angry Women", which I can't find at the moment. Most of the rest of the interpretation is condensed from stuff available on the web, especially this.
If you're going to edit out the marriage and the Munich theatre thing, at least do so in a way that's consistent throughout the article instead of leaving in later references to her family and cutting the munich theatre incident short in the middle of a sentence and then whining about the edit being undone. 24.17.161.178 (talk) 04:30, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There are several sources stating that Aktionshose : Genitalpanik did, in fact, occur ,, , contrary to the edits that removed it. Still no source on the marriage/kids, but I see no reason not to include the paragraph about Aktionshose : Genitalpanik. 24.17.161.178 (talk) 09:57, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 18:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I reverted a page move that was done without discussion and was contrary to Wikipedia naming conventions that biographies of living persons and other articles on persons should have the title of the name by which the person is usually known, which is Valie Export.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Move 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Valie Export Contemporary Art on Feminism. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Valie Export Contemporary Art on Feminism" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Michelangelo Signorile

message: Curious as how Signorile has his occupation listed among other things as "gay"... Is this missing the word "advocate" or similar? Bill D (talk) 00:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Occupation 

message: The first time a work is mentioned, it should be done so using its full title.  
In this case, it's "Queer in America: Sex, the Media, and the Closets of Power".  
i'm going to edit the article to reflect this.  TheArcane03 (talk) 20:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  first mention of book needs full title, not abbreviated version 
Talk:Gedion Nyanhongo

message: This article could do with being toned down. For example,
 His figures, cut from blocks of native stone, glow with emotion, frequently joy.
 If it never seemed possible to find love in the center of a piece of rock before, Nyanhongo has done so now, repeatedly.
Hmmm.... - Gobeirne 01:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: i nominate that for the most blatant advertising ever awards. do we have those ???? Flying Hamster 23:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Respiratory rate

message: Can somebody who knows add the correct abbreviation please, obviously it's not bpm because that's used for heart rate. RCoulthard (talk) 14:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008-2009

message: Definite need for revision, especially in the "Optimum rate" section, which stops in midst a sentence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.60.159.10 (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definite

message: This section is missing something. How do I report it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.254.170 (talk) 01:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optimum Breathing 

message: What determines the respiratory rate?  What part of the nervous system is in involved in determining the breathing rate? What is this determination a function of (CO2 level in blood?) --Atethnekos (talk) 03:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some info to include, biologists 

message: If someone has information on respiratory rates in animals, that might be worth a section in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macholl (talk • contribs) 12:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  respiratory rates in animals 

message: In the second paragraph it says that "However it is not yet proven..." What is it that's not proven? It seems like there may have been a statement about some studies that possibly was deleted.
Also, under the heading Normal Range, it says "(12/60 Hz)". Hertz is rate per minute, so the proper way to say the average resp. rate is just "12 Hz". Is the 12/60 Hz how it appears in the references? Randicoot (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  some clarification needed 

message: My respiratory rate in rest is only about 6 to 7 breaths per minute while I'm perfectly healthy. So, I think the lower limits are bogus, they likely only apply to people who are not very fit. Count Iblis (talk) 04:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The recent uncommented change that I reverted moved in the wrong direction.  There are plenty of sources if someone wants to pick a good one and update the data and cite it.  Seems like most people have a higher rate than you, though. Dicklyon (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

text: WP:SOFIXIT.  Dicklyon (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lower limits are clearly wrong
Talk:Gandiva

message: The information on here was simply wrong before. It could simply be a matter of translation but I can't imagine another alternative. added by ChaosEmerald (talk) at 02:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information 

message: Discussion of a proposed consolidated Weapons of power in Hindu mythology article is at Talk:Kurukshetra War#New article proposed - "Weapons of power in Hindu epics".  --Bejnar (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article proposed - "Weapons of power in Hindu epics" 
Talk:Science and technology in Israel

message: The article suffers from undue weight presented as snippets of tangential information, for example  that has little to nothing to do with science and technology as a whole. The article is filled with these little blurbs about individuals, singular events, and specific government programs. The article should be focused on the biggest influences on academia, high-level views of entire industries and their largest companies, and events that shape science and technology as a whole, not a specific project or programme. HueSurname (talk) 03:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight issues
Talk:Mackenzie Valley Pipeline

message: It is worthwhile to note the probable greenhouse gas effects of this pipeline and the usage of the gas for oil sands extraction. According to the David Suzuki Foundation, it could contribute 25 megatonnes of greenhouse gases. That is 15 times the total GHG releases for Nunavut and the Northwest Territories. This has led the Suzuki Foundation to recommend the cancellation of the pipeline.
David Suzuki Foundation. All Over the Map: 2006 Status Report of Provincial Climate Change Plans. 2006.
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/files/climate/AOTM2_English.pdf
:Given that the majority of NG is used for home heating or electricity generation, and that it is the most efficient fossil fuel in either of those roles, by far, it is more accurate to say that using the NG would offset 50 megatons of GHG from coal and oil. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The lead mentions that the gas fields should contain " 1.9 trillion cubic metres " of NG. How does that compare with other fields worked by similar methods? I'm trying to understand whether this is a lot or a little gas. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  And that is? 
Talk:Shajapur

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Ken Barlow

message: Re this edit: the HTML note says "Essentially he did not leave, just took a break. He was not 'reintroduced' in 2014, just returned to normal after his real-life court case." This is correct as he never left the show formally. Please don't edit war on this.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active years as a character played by William Roache
Talk:Chips

message: Some of the entries formed Chips (nickname). Clarityfiend (talk) 01:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Chips in Australia are never French Fries. However French Fries can be considered to be a type of Chips not the other way around. Why isn't the article called Chips and have French Fries as a sub category. It seems the disambiguation (and the redirect to French Fries) puts a USA-centric focus on this. 
BTW - In Australia most people know packet Chips can also be called Crisps. Sometimes if there is confusion the other Chips are callled hot Chips and packet Chips are called crisps. A famous brand of Chips is Smith's Crisps. Ozdaren 14:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chips v French Fries

message: 1. I am attempting to improve this article by adding information. 
2. This article refers to the chip, something that in USA is the same as a french fry - but in many other English speaking nations there are both chips and french fries, being different food items.
No reason for a delete. 
カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 17:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I suggest that editors give this article time to expand and show relevance before moving/etc カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, forget it. I have moved it to the disambiguation until such time (if ever) that there is enough exclusive/relevant information to warrant a separate article. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 13:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the move, please watch the language. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 13:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete request 

message: I came here looking to find information on other types of chips (tortilla chips, bean chips, etc.) and there’s nothing? Shouldn’t that be here. I understand it’s more of an American usage of the word, but Wikipedia should extend to that, no? 68.41.54.42 (talk) 19:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We have articles on both of those at tortilla chip and bean chip.  This page is a disambiguation page, which means it only includes things that are called simply "chip", or sometimes called "chip", not partial matches like "tortilla chip".  You can find other kinds of chips at :category:Snack foods. SpinningSpark 20:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other kinda of chips?
Talk:Grossinger Motors Arena

message: Someone cleanup the citations, either that or put up  tags.  --71.113.165.111 04:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Citation 

message: The City Council vote to proceed with the arena project took place on December 8, 2003. The vote was 5-4, with Mayor Markowitz breaking the tie (verified by the Bloomington City Clerk, cityclerk@cityblm.org). The advisory vote on whether to use public funds to build an arena was conducted on March 16, 2004, and failed, 3513 to 6796 (verfied by Bloomington Board of Election Commissioners, becvote@becvote.org). Some residents of the City were angered, not because the City Council disregarded the referendum, but because it did not wait for the referendum. User:Tgreenbu 14:39, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Votes on Arena
Talk:Diophantus

message: The recent addition comparing Diophantus and Khwarizmi could potentially be valuable but http://www.crystalinks.com/diophantus.html is a blog page and therefore is not a reliable source. Tkuvho (talk) 12:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  diophantus and khwarizmi 

message: I've removed the following sentence (added by an IP without any hint of a citation) from the section "Biography":
"It was at first found that Diophantus lived between AD 250-350 by analysing the price of wine used in many of his mathematical texts and finding out the period during which wine was sold at that price." --Florian Blaschke (talk) 03:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diophantus' lifetime deduced from the price of wine?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Webcomics/Evidence

message: I am deeply concerned by the apparent direction the evidence has just taken.  The issues this RfAr was accepted on are WP:BITE and WP:AGF, and yet evidence is now being presented of users having "wrong" views on deletion policy.  What's going on? How can disagreeing with other users on what a policy page should say possibly be evidence of any wrongdoing? -- SCZenz 04:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There were also, at least in the raising of the case, concerns brought (On my part) regarding atempts to railroad and stealthily change policy - certainly the removing of longstanding parts of the deletion policy with misleading edit summaries would fall under that, and to that end I see at least some of Tony's contributions as useful - indeed, I was going to add the "removed content added by anonymous user" diff myself. Phil Sandifer 04:31, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Those are legitimate issues.  I remain concerned, however, that Aaron is being pushed extremely hard on his editing habits because many people disagree with his views.  Some of that evidence only relates to him having the "wrong" attitude. But of course all of this is for the arbitrators to sort out. -- SCZenz 04:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good mannors and practices exist so that people who have disagreeing views can coexist without causing disruption.  But as you say the evidence that he has the wrong views is irrevent.  Evedence that he didn't WP:AGF or WP:BITE should be presented.  Dformosa 05:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Surprise, surprise. Like I said before: this is not about good faith or biting newbies, this is about Snowspinner winning a content dispute and enforcing his views on policy. The arbitrators should have been sensible enough not to accept a case based on such appallingly tenuous grounds; one would think by now they'd have the experience to see what was really going on. Everyking 07:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You were, I believe, instructed to familiarize yourself with the particulars of a case before commenting. Go do so, and come back when you know who added the evidence in question. Phil Sandifer 08:00, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not talking about particulars; I'm talking about the basis of it. Everyking 08:04, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For God's sake, do I have to spell it out for you? SCZenz isn't complaining about me here, he's complaining about Tony. Tony's evidence cannot possibly make the case more about my winning a content dispute, since, as I'm sure you're aware, I am not Tony. Phil Sandifer 08:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe I should have said one side, without specifying you. But you're at the center of it, as I see it, so I think that's appropriate. I'll grant that it's probably an oversimplification to blame everything on one person, though. Everyking 08:30, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been very "Wikipedia Vs. Webcomics" pretty much since the beginning.   Kinda sad, really. Nifboy 00:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion policy debate
Talk:Structure fire

message: I recommend that this page be deleted.  There is no such thing as a "Structural fire",
only a Structure fire.  I have copied the text from this entry over to the entry for "Structure fire".  The words "Structrual Fire" imply that a fire is a part of the structure of something.  I think it is pretty clear that fire, in and of itself, doesn't have any redeeming qualities in adding to the structure of anything; fire doesn't have the capacity to support a structure.  
Things that are structural are structural beams, structural joists, etc.
If I had known how to use Wikipedia better, I would've requested to move Structural fire to Structure fire, but I didn't.  
Please delete this entry.
--CeruleanShine 04:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article probably needs a lot of work, but I find it very useful that it exist, as in the many articles about specific building fires, it makes sense to link "fire" to the more-general concept of a building fire, rather than linking directly to fire which is too general. --GregU (talk) 14:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful node 

message: From my point, as a firefighter, the term structure fire means a fire that actually involves the structure; not simply "inside" a structure.  There is a distinction between what we call a "room in contents fire" and a "structure fire"; in that the actual supporting members, and structural integrity of the building is compromised because of the fire. Sullivan.t (talk) 19:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual definition...  

message: First of all, there is no reference for where these come from. Are they from a standardized code? Training document? Textbook? Do they apply everywhere, or just in the US? Actually, I can answer that last question. Light timber framing (category V) has been the predominant construction method in single-family houses and smallish suburban apartment buildings in the US for a long time, but both category IV and V are vanishingly rare in many European countries, where brick and concrete block are the main building materials for small residential construction. For instance, a typical house in The Netherlands would have an inner wall made of some sort of large concrete or ceramic blocks surrounded by an outer wall made of traditional brick. Structural timber is mostly found in roof structures and sometimes floors, though mostly in older houses.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.67.107 (talk) 14:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 5 categories
Talk:Trafalgar 200

message: Wow! Someone really went crazy with those stub markers!
New public domain image of The Queen and Admiral Sir Alan West placed at :Image:Elizabeth II v pd.jpg.  Best wishes, Des Desk1 15:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Seemingly commercial plugs removed, somewhat rewritten, Trafalgar 200 link redirected so you don't end up in the gift shop that is their front page. Motmot 20:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited somewhat 

message: I seem to remember BBC news commenting on the fact that in the whole "blue-red" the "red side won".  1) How could any side "win"?  2) Wasn't red the enemy?  I.e. France and Spain?!  BBC news therefore implied that at this celebration the French/Spanish won...which as everyone knows would be wrong.
(I'd like to feature something about this in the article but I can't find sufficient sources and I believe it's likely to be considered "of little relevance").  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.57.177 (talk) 15:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colours
Talk:Sarcosine

message: I deleted the toxicity section because it sourced an article which was referring to the toxicity of two different glycine transporter inhibitors, not sarcosine.
GrimeMuted (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Toxicity

message: It seems to me that there's a methyl group missing from the nitrogen atom.  Am I wrong?68.38.103.36 (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a methyl group on the nitrogen.  In a skeletal formula, a carbon is designated by a line  - in this case, the one at the leftmost end of the structure.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Answer me please 95.159.82.171 (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why glycine have 2 line between c and o 

message: good catch.  The b.p. was described as "predicted".  I looked at many papers and preps.  No mention of distilling sarcosine.  So I removed the datum.--Smokefoot (talk) 03:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is boiling point temperature lower than the melting point temperature? Obvious error, can someone fix that know the real numbers?