lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Knights Templar School

message: Surely some of the ex pupils are wrong - George Bush!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.167.34 (talk) 10:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gustav, 7th Prince of Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg

message: The succession does not go to Prince Robin, due to his morganatic marriage; it devolves onto Gustav's cousin Bernhard.
:Source please? Neither Germany's Privatfürstenrecht nor the house laws of any of the mediatized dynasties excluded from succession the dynast who married morganatically: that is exclusively a feature of 20th century still-reigning dynasties. According to the 2011 Genealogisches Handbuch des Adels, Fürstliche Hauser Band XIX (which explicitly cites its information to, among others, 3 sources -- Richard Prinz zu Sayn-Wittgenstein, Alexander Furst zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn and Peter Prinz zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg, on page 338), Prince Robin remains in the Berleberg line of succession. Absent a cite to the contrary, Prince Robin remains a full dynast. FactStraight (talk) 00:22, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession
Talk:Farid Zoland

message: His nationality is confirmed to be Afghan, anyone changing it back to Iranian will be banned.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.155.17.103 (talk) 04:48, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: nationality

message: The second section, almost entirely about Afghani racial politics, seems non-neutral to me.  This section is also larger than the section on what he actually did.  BecauseWhy? (talk) 07:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 
Talk:Frederick Henry, Hereditary Prince of the Palatinate

message: Recent literature lists him as Frederick Henry, not Henry Frederick. I'm unclear if the current page title is a typo or reflects some older/other language tradition? Either way, I propose the page be renamed to the current English-language consensus.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProcrastinatingHistorian (talk • contribs) 19:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: SUPPORT: I don't see any reason for the article to be titled incorrectly. Even if it is to avoid confusion between him and his father, just put a disambiguation link at the top. --CybJubal (talk) 22:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move
Talk:Kyle Academy

message: Victuallers 12:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:La Sagesse School

message: Rita Tushingham will have attended the (now closed) La Sagesse school in Liverpool. CustardJack 11:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 2007 
Talk:Farrukh Amonatov

message: An image used in this article, , has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Fastily for the following reason: No license since 29 April 2011
;What should I do?
You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 00:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:FarrukhAmonatov.jpg Deleted
Talk:Ernest, Count of Lippe-Biesterfeld

message: Minor question/clarification - the birth dates for the two children born in 1873 be added (ie I presume they were not twins). Jackiespeel 22:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The two children born in 1873 are twins I will add the precise dates of birth.dwc lr 00:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Farshid Mesghali

message: Relying on the US Library of Congress, which uses "Mesqali, Farsheed" primarily, two U.S. publishers of ʻAmmū Nawrūz in English rendered the title and name thus: 
*  Uncle New Year ... Farsheed Meskali (Minneapolis MN: Carolrhoda Books, 1972)
*  Uncle Noruz ... Farsheed Mesqali (Lexington KY: Mazda Publishers, 1983)
Today I will mention "Farsheed Mesqali" in the lead.
: Not done. -p64 2013-08-19
VIAF has not yet unified library records for this author:
* http://viaf.org/viaf/220810474/ (Mesghali, Farshid‏)
* http://viaf.org/viaf/33376969/#Mesqali,_Farsheed
* http://viaf.org/viaf/290006227/#Mit%CC%B1qa%CC%84li%CC%84,_Fars%CC%8Ci%CC%84d
and none of those records yet includes a link to this article (as VIAF pages commonly do). 
: Resolved. Those three VIAF records have been merged with http://viaf.org/viaf/22433437/ which does link this article. (The German record is only a nameholder and there is another record  
 
: for the name "Mitqālī, Faršīd".) --P64 (talk) 14:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity 

message: Among other things, the biography at fa.wikipedia, as translated by Google
# gives birthdate "13 Persian date Tir 1322" and "13 July 1322"
# lists one more award: "Apples of Gold" Biennial of Illustrations Bratislava, Czechoslovakia for the illustration book "Arash" (1970)
# mentions "the period of the artist's collaboration with the Institute for Intellectual Development of Children and Adolescents" —[the publisher of Romanized Persian editions that I have listed here, from LCCat and WorldCat]
# states that Farshid was nominated for the Astrid Lindgren Award in 1391
--P64 (talk) 23:42, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes from fa.wikipedia via Google translate
Talk:Laine Theatre Arts

message: Good start - an infobox ?Victuallers 21:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes per good article criteria sections to go in the manner of for example Royal Academy of Dramatic Art but good for its size, in terms of roll, financial scale and publicity.- Adam37 Talk 17:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fatemeh Motamed-Arya

message: Several new photos have been added to the article that were just uploaded on Wiki Commons, by the same editor who added them to the article claiming them as original works.  Based on some searching on Google, it seems like there may be some copyright conflicts.  The reason for removing the previous photos from the article (lack of hijab) doesn't really seem to fall within any WP I'm familiar with.  (Perhaps another editor could point it out.)  Also, there are numerous photos of the actress without hijab available on Google so I don't see what it accomplishes to remove them from the Wikipedia article.  I'm thinking this article should be reverted to the old photos as I imagine the new ones are going to be delete for copyright violation.  --Klaun (talk) 01:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photos added to the article (and previous photo deletion)
Talk:Roderick Vonhögen

message: He was on De Wereld Draait Door today where he talked about the 3D Phantom Menace film, being a huge Star Wars nut. IIRC he ran a Star Wars site around the time that film originally came out (1999). This isn't mentioned in the article. Does anyone remember what that site was named? SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 01:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added this to the article. Jdcompguy (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Wars
Talk:Lancaster Steiner School

message: Tell us more ...Victuallers 14:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the absence of any proper third party sources for this school, I believe it should be a redirect. --MarchOrDie (talk) 10:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Before you redirect or otherwise delete an article, you really should get consensus from other editors. Out of courtesy, it would help to allow other editors time to respond. I have found several references that establish this school's notability, in my opinion, and I'm about to add them. Thanks. --EPadmirateur (talk) 13:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work! It's worth noting that the previous tag proposing a merge sat there for over three years without seeing any such addition of sources, but all's well that ends well and you deserve recognition for adding those sources. Just to be clear though, there is no policy that I know of requiring consensus before redirecting an article; WP:BOLD applies as it does to any other edit.--MarchOrDie (talk) 18:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and redirect to Waldorf education
Talk:Adolphus I, Prince of Schaumburg-Lippe

message: There were only 3. Where are the other 5 ? Died in infancy/by birth maybe ? 
--2001:871:42:5989:3CE3:FCFF:BFE4:44A (talk) 17:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  8 children ?
Talk:Q3 Academy Langley

message: Can anyone give me a hand and insert link from John Jennings (notable pupils) to his wiki page. Thanks in anticipation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Jennings_(businessman)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:92A2:8700:E9A5:A6CB:AAAA:71F1 (talk) 11:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Langleybury

message: Hi,
There is a mistake on the Langleybury page. The script states that in the 1960's a new building was built South of the main building. This is incorrect as I went to Langleybury school, and I left in 1958 and I spent the last year in the main building, so it was finished in 1957 213.107.166.1 (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Larchfield Academy

message: This article does not seem to be a suitable topic for a merge. This is a very old school dating back to 1845 with some very high-profile alumni. The article needs references, but a lack of references is no reason for a merge. Dahliarose (talk) 09:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Best look for some sources then. At the moment the whole thing could be a hoax for all the verifiability it has. --John (talk) 10:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Fatima Surayya Bajia

message: This article has been reclassified as a start due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassified as a start
Talk:Maria Josepha of Bavaria

message: Maria Josepha was born on the 20th of March, on the same day like her stepdaughter Maria Theresia,  (20th March 1762 - 23th January 1770). 
You can also read the information on the homepage of the Imperial Crypt. --AndreaMimi (talk) 20:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  20th March 1739
Talk:Leeds Arts University

message: The college is named as "Leeds College of Art and Design" on its own web page, on its building (see photo), on the UCU branch website http://lcaducu.blogspot.com/ and in the Ofsted report at http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxedu_reports/download/(id)/85216/(as)/130547_284872.pdf .  Please do not change it to anything else without producing evidence. PamD (talk) 11:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've found my own evidence - the college website has changed since I last looked at it, and the Independent says the name has recently changed. So I've moved the article to the new name. PamD (talk) 11:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the college 

message: Should Green Gartside (or Scritti Politti if you will) actually qualify as a notable alumni?  Firstly most accounts seem to imply he became bored with art school and dropped out to move to London. It's not entirely clear if he finished the course.  I would have thought completion of a course would be a prerequisite for being an alumni of any institution.  Secondly, his page and the Scritti Politti page say he studied art at Leeds Polytechnic/Leeds Met. and links to Leeds Met page, not here. As this article mentions some of the College's teaching was ceded by the Polytechnic, should Gartside class as an alumni of Leeds College of Art at all? Kaleeyed (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* Notable alumni * Green Gartside (Scritti Politti)
Talk:Leeds College of Technology

message: I have added a link to the new Leeds City College page which will replace the former three colleges on the 1st April 2009. BNC85 (talk) 11:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Leeds City College
Talk:Eleonora Gonzaga (1630–1686)

message: I have copy edited this page's sources after the large expansion by User:Aldebaran69. While most of the new text is supported by reliable sources there is some text that is not.
*Aldebaran69 if you add a source to a paragraph but it does not cover all the text from the last citation/beginning of the paragraph then add the template  for the last sentence NOT covered by the new citation. This is the reason for my appending  to the sentence "...wife and cousin Maria Gonzaga (heiress to the Duchy of Montferrat).[citation needed]
*Aldebaran69 I added  because nothing in the brackets "(who in 1627 inherited the Duchy of Mantua after the extinction of the main line of the House of Gonzaga) and Catherine of Mayenne (a member of the House of Lorraine)" is in the citation.
*Aldebaran69 I added  to another Lundy citation. Lundy is an unreliable source and not all of what he adds to his page comes from reliable sources, so only those facts covered by reliable sources can be used via WP:SAYWHEREYOUREADIT. In this case his sources are:
**[S102] Roglo Geneweb Website, online <http://geneweb.inria.fr/roglo?lang=en>. Hereinafter cited as Roglo Geneweb Website.
**[S3409] Caroline Maubois, "re: Penancoet Family," e-mail message to Darryl Roger Lundy, 2 December 2008. Hereinafter cited as "re: Penancoet Family."
:Neither of which are reliable sources so http://thepeerage.com/p10525.htm#i105248 is not a reliable source because it fails WP:SAYWHEREYOUREADIT
*. The Russian source "Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary" needs a page number without that English monoglot will not be able to find the facts in the Dictionary as the alphabet is not Latin. Unless the page can be provided the citation and information extracted from it will be deleted.
*I replaced the template  in the Ancestry I am not sure why it was removed as the section still has no citations.
-- PBS (talk) 12:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification and page needed tags  

message: @user:Aldebaran69 "Citations should not be placed within or on the same line as section and subsection headings." (MOS:HEADINGS)
Ancestry trees are very difficult to source because you need an explicit source that states who the father and mother were for every branch of the tree. Just because a person's father or mother was x does not automatically mean that the spouse is the other parent as in the middle ages and eary modern period it is common for people to marry more than once. One mistake early in a tree can mean that upto half of the tree is incorrect. So great care is needed on these ancesty trees that the sources used are reliable and comprehensive. -- PBS (talk) 23:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, understood, no more citations in headings. Thanks Aldebaran69 (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry trees
Talk:William Alnwick

message: I've added some information about +William to the page, from the Google Books edition of Woolley's "The Award of William of Alnwick"  I'm afraid I'm not all that familiar with Wikipedia's formatting, though, so I have have got this wrong. I also have a translation of +William's epitaph from Latin, but as I translated it myself I don't suppose it is eligible for Wiki. EtaBetaPi (talk) 04:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Information
Talk:Leeds School of Medicine

message: Thanks for uploading or contributing to :Image:Leeds medical school.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 05:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:Leeds medical school.jpg]]
Talk:Fausto Fernós

message: I volunteer to improve this article and to incorporate references (including additional ones).--Lawrlafo (talk) 03:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now done extensive revisions and added references.--Lawrlafo (talk) 05:19, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving article

message: The article currently includes several reliable sources (Chicago Tribune, Chicago History Museum, Time Out Chicago) which establish notability of Fausto Fernós. I recommend eliminating the Additional Citations Needed and notability tags.--Lawrlafo (talk) 03:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability and additional references
Talk:Rosenstrasse (film)

message: It's not very satisfactory having the US rating but not the German one! 86.132.142.207 (talk) 19:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating
Talk:Gladys Cooper

message: I have assessed this article at "Start class".  This is because it has a serious referencing problem.  Although there is a lot of excellent information in the article, nearly all of it is referenced to one website.  The article could easily move up to C-class if more sources were used to verify the information given. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I have removed from the lead the mention of Cooper's married title en secondes noces. Many famous actresses married, but it is not lead-worthy to mention in the leads that e.g. Beatrice Lillie was Lady Peel, Edith Evans Mrs Booth, Peggy Ashcroft Lady Hutchinson, Sybil Thorndyke Lady Casson and so on. The information would, of course, be wholly suitable in the details in the main text. Comments from any other editors who watch this page will as usual be much appreciated. Tim riley talk  18:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the change by User:Tim riley.  This actress was always known as Gladys Cooper.  Her married title was not a form of address that she commonly used, and adding that information to the Lead is merely distracting. The information about the marriage is given below. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimming lead
Talk:Leith Academy

message: An old school with potentially a very interesting history. Come back for a re-assessment when you have some more content. Pics, references, alumni and an infobox would help. Dahliarose 15:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Kruškovac

message: Does it have sugar?  If not, like slivovica, it's not a liqueur.  Badagnani 23:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Kruškovac is a liqueur, it's sweet and it is not like šljivovica - 172.158.225.123 23:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sugar?

message: Is it commercially produced? If so, where and by which company? Badagnani 06:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercially produced?
Talk:Federica Fontana

message: Federica is NOT a "Showgirl" and should not be called one. As almost anyone who lives in North America (the majority of English speakers in the World) - or is familiar with the Hollywood motion pictures very much - knows, a "Showgirl" is a woman who has at least some knowledge of dancing and appears in the "song & dance" hotel & casino shows in places like Las Vegas, Nevada and Reno, Nevada. For more info, see about the American movie Showgirls made by the Dutch movie director Paul Verhoven. 
In these "Las Vegas" shows, the dancers, selected for their good looks and long legs, wear elaborate costumes, usually based on bikinis, and they commonly also appear topless, in thong panties, or even completely nude.74.163.51.46 (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is NOT what Federica does as a line of work in any case, and besides that, she had never resided in or near Nevada or any other state that features "Showgirl" productions. To know what a showgirl does, you really need to see Showgirls - but these entertainers have also been portrayed in plenty of other Hollywood movies - ones that were set in Nevada, and especially in Las Vegas.74.163.51.46 (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT A SHOWGIRL
Talk:Lincoln Christ's Hospital School

message: There seems to be some less than little debate over the accuracy of this piece! Is there even any evidence to suggest this school exists and is not just another one of Tojo's games? 
The WEBSITE looks rather odd. I am not convinced by this...school...something is not correct!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelic Raiment (talk • contribs) 18:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ofsted appear to have heard of the school and made a report on it. Keith D (talk) 19:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct? 

message: Where are the links to these alumni? I have just removed Tom Heaton from the list; as far as I'm aware he had lived in Lancashire all of his youth and has absolutely nothing to do with this school, as evidenced by his own Wikipedia page. I'm convinced that some of these other alumni have been added in similar acts of vandalism, and unless some evidence can be unearthed these are going to have to go. 86.135.81.220 (talk) 10:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni
Talk:Ronald Fraser (actor)

message: He is described as "English-born Scottish". There is no source for ascribing this very awkward origin to Fraser. I haven't seen this wording used elsewhere either.
Shouldn't we change this to a more direct description? If not, can someone say how the English and Scottish labels are defined? These cannot be official so why are they used instead of official labels as for other countries? I suggest just taking out the confusing phrase as the rest of the sentence (and paragraph) works without it.--154.59.156.92 (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, the categories say English actor, or English of Scottish descent.  He was born and died in England.  He was educated in Scotland and his father was from there, but he himself seems to have been English.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 02:44, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The categories are usually added after the text so they are not authoritative. The "English" and "Scottish" labels are not defined and are only used in support of a specific statement of such by the subject of the article. We don't have one here. As with the rest of the world, the state citizenship (British) should be used to describe the person involved. --Muirofsara (talk) 13:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description in intro
Talk:Minnie Hollow Wood

message: I'm wondering, what where her actions that caused the commendation?Leppi 09:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My sources don't say. I can't seem to find much more about her, unfortunately. Asarelah 17:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If and when you do find out, it seems to me that this would be an interesting piece of information. I'll try to keep my eyes open for it. Leppi 05:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Most anything you would find would be orally passed down with the Sioux/Cheyenne community. There isn't much written record about this battle and almost everything is from the Sioux/Cheyenne perspective because the US Cavalry were wiped out.Tsistunagiska (talk) 17:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Johann von Lamont

message: Is Johann von Lamont the same "Lamont" of Lamont's star near the nucleus of Messier 31? This star (Lamont's star) is briefly mentioned in the SKY CATALOGUE 2000.0, Volume 2: Double Stars, Variable Stars and Nonstellar Objects (1985) and also in the DEEP-SKY NAME INDEX 2000.0 by Hugh C. Maddocks (1991). Those who still have the SKY & TELESCOPE of February 1968 should take a look at page 97 because it  has a description of Lamont's star and its location near the centre of the Andromeda galaxy. Unfortunately I don't have SKY & TELESCOPES of the sixties (only those of the nineties). DannyCaes (talk) 08:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lamont's star near the nucleus of Messier 31 (the Andromeda galaxy)