lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oliver Cromwell

message: The ISSN is actually 0300-337X, as evidenced by the fact that 0330-337X has an invalid checksum (the last digit would have to be a 3, which is already taken by a title in Tunisia). 2603:8001:4542:28FB:C42A:86EF:90BA:97A3 (talk) 01:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for spotting this. GarethAd (talk) 08:51, 24 August 202390.250.142.122 (talk) 21:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2023 

message: Please edit "Episcopalian" to "episcopalian". 
Use of the capital creates ambiguity with the Episcopalian Church - i.e. the Anglican Church in the US - esp for readers from the US.  
Current code:-
It was designed to check the powers of the executive, to set up regularly elected parliaments, and to restore a non-compulsory Episcopalian settlement.
Proposed code:-
It was designed to check the powers of the executive, to set up regularly elected parliaments, and to restore a non-compulsory episcopalian settlement. 193.116.206.35 (talk) 05:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done now, thanks. Moons of Io (talk) 08:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please edit "Episcopalean" to "episcopalean".   

message: The phrase "the brutality of his campaign in Ireland" should be removed. Modern historians have argued the atrocities happened under the direction of other generals, after Cromwell had returned to England. (2A00:23C5:C416:A601:8D10:7F9F:F317:B65F (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: to dispute those things, we need presentations from credible historians or experts in 17th British history field that could help ur concern regarding Cromwell's conduct in Ireland Ahendra (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased lede 

message: Completely reasonable statement, but why does it matter what Churchill thought of him? 142.126.146.180 (talk) 23:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The debate over his historical reputation continues."
Talk:Tom and Jerry (disambiguation)

message: Didn't they call Germans Jerries and the Brits Tommies in WWII?
Isn't tom and jerry also a reference to two horses, one that pulls and one that tags along while the other pulls? -- User:Kenallen 26 October 2006
What is the deal with dopamine at the bottom of the page? Dosn't show up in edit view?!?--The_stuart 00:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So the Tom and Jerry comic characters were based upon whom ? Jay 17:53, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:   I thought as a kid it mean to play at soldiers - Tommies -- the British -- and Jerries -- the Germans. - Sparky 05:27, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Tom and Jerry may refer to...

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tom and Jerry disambiguation. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  DannyS712 (talk) 06:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tom and Jerry disambiguation" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Detroit Red Wings

message: Jack Adams is listed as a Hall of Fame builder. He was inducted as a player. If he could be inducted in multiple categories he would almost definitely be inducted for his work with the Red Wings, but he isn't in as a builder, and never played for them. This list also has Brian Kilrea, Bud Poile, and Al Arbour listed as player inductees. They were inducted as builders. Most similar to Keith Allen and Murray Costello, who have notes saying that they played for the Red Wings, are acknowledged for their affiliation, but went in as builders despite never working for the team outside of their playing days. Your mileage may vary on Bud Poile there, he did some coaching for Red Wings minor league affiliates. 99.237.222.68 (talk) 12:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You may want to bring this up at WP:HOCKEY, as I suspect there's a lot of these misplaced individuals, throughout the NHL team pages. GoodDay (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hall of Famers 
Talk:Nunavut

message: Under Culture/Tobacco, the article states: "Smoking affects both men and women equally, and the overwhelming majority (90%) of pregnant women are smokers.[70]"
The 90% figure is presented as if it has some scientific precision, but it does not. Reading the linked article, the quote is from a government "tobacco-reduction specialist", Freddie Best.  Best says "Anecdotally, we hear from community health staff and staff at Qikiqtani General Hospital that upwards of 90 per cent of pregnant women smoke." So it's really just a swag, but it is also not likely to be true.
The article [70] links to "Nunavut has Canada's highest smoking rates at 62 per cent" ( http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/northern-smoking-drinking-rates-highest-in-canada-2014-health-report-1.3125120] ), which describes a government report finding the overall smoking rate in Nunavut is 62%. And somehow pregnant women outpace even this and clock in at 90%? Something seems fishy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobbzilla (talk • contribs) 00:15, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tobacco" 

message: An issue has come up:  should the infobox to this article contain the field "government_type", filled in with "Parliamentary system with consensus government".  Since this issue affects all ten provinces and the three territories, a Request for Comment has been started on the Canadian Wikipedians Notice Board.  If you are interested in this issue, please come to the Notice Board and contribute to the discussion. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute about Infobox content 

message: Perhaps discuss the decision of the bounary to chop little bits of e.g., Mackenzie King Island. Jidanni (talk) 08:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The boundary is defined by the 110th meridian west, rather than allotting whole islands to one territory or the other. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It also depended on the traditional usage of the area. See Parker's Notch and :File:VictoriaIslandMap Parker's Notch.png where it doesn't follow the 110th meridian because of Cambridge Bay and Kugluktuk in one land claims area and Ulukhaktok in another. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discuss island chopping logic
Talk:Toledo Mud Hens

message: This article appears to contain three different teams conflated together. Toledo Mud Hens (1902-1913) , Toledo Mud Hens (1916-1955) , Toledo Mud Hens (1965-present); the 1965 team was in 1964 called the Richmond Virginians, so obviously, this article is problematically conflated. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 21:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose While the team has changed names and moved for a few years, the franchise (as far as I can tell) is still the same over all those years. See the media guide for the history of the franchise. — X96lee15 (talk) 12:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Split apart
Talk:Clarinetist

message: Many of the people listed here have little or no supporting information by which even to help identify them, let alone to enable one to verify they are clarinetists of sufficient stature to merit being here.  For all I know, in some cases, they're self-nominated elementary school students.  Of course I am no expert on clarinet soloists and prominent orchestral clarinetists of the world, so most of them probably are eminent clarinetists; but that's the point, the non-expert reader shouldn't have to guess.  I would suggest that the following names (from the classical section; probably similar remarks apply to the jazz section too) ought to be linked to biographical Wikipedia articles, or to external biographical links, or should have some brief explanatory text added; or they should be considered for removal.
* Daniel Aistrop 
* Cristro Barrios 
* Eric Bonhagen, Critically Acclaimed Soloist  
* Michael Collins 
* Vladimir Cvija 
* Tonči Djuka 
* Stephen Foss 
* Erin George 
* Mihael Gunzek 
* Dom James, Passmore 
* Einar Jóhannesson 
* Theodore Johnson 
* Igor Karlin 
* Thea King 
* Howard Klug 
* Atanas Kolev 
* Karl Leister 
* Matija Levaj 
* Jon Manasse 
* Charles Neidich 
* Josip Nochta 
* Gervase de Peyer 
* Josip Pomikalo 
* Aleksije Radan 
* Petko Radev 
* Tejan Reilly 
* Gligor Smokvarski 
* Ratko Spasovski 
* Josip Tonžetić 
* Miroslav Vukajlović, Serbia 
* Charles West (Note, linked to a Charles West who is not described as a clarinetist)
-- Rsholmes 18:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who are these people, anyway?
Talk:Tehran

message: There is a ice hockey league for women in Tehran. It is kind of national league of the country because other cities actually don't care about hockey at all. 5.211.62.112 (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice hockey league (Women's) 

message: Also in the economy section you mentioned Iran Mall as the biggest one in the world, which can be misleading because many of it's stores are not active due to the sanctions. 5.211.62.112 (talk) 23:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: where is this exactly MatthewKulinsky (talk) 20:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iran Mall 

message: This is the second time that I have to tell @Farnaj57 that Firuzkuh is not part of the metropolitan area. All maps show that this small city is over 100 km away from the Greater Tehran’s urban agglomeration.
If you want to revert my edit, Please provide a RS for verifying this claim.PAper GOL (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firooz Kooh in Greater Tehran?! 

message: We need to make sure this article can load up with an normal internet connection, even right now there are too many images... idk why but deleting them is not easy too.. FreeZoneF (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that this is a country page.... But a good example would be to follow the parent article Iran that follows WP:COUNTRYGALLERIE , MOS:UPRIGHT and MOS:SANDWICH. Moxy🍁 00:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Moxy Thanks for your concern. I'm leaving WP for a while, can you please watch this article? A user is kinda destroying this article by adding misleading information. I can not undo his changes anymore and I'm sure nobody gives a "damn" about this article too.. FreeZoneF (talk) 22:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop adding images
Talk:Deuterostome/Archive 1

message: Is the placement of Deuterostomia as a subkingdom typical?  I've seen it placed as a superphylum of the subkingdom Bilateria, but more often as an unranked group.--Josh Grosse
:I think you're right. I've never heard them called a subkingdom and my General bio text doesn't say anything about placement. Although I do remember other instructors of mine say that they are a type of superphylum since several Deuterostomia phyla all have similar zygote cleavage. --maveric149
--
State of arts in the phylogeny of deuterostomes
*deuterostoma
**? mitrata (+) (carpoides)
**ambulacraria
***hemicordata
****enteropneusts
****pterobranchia
***echinodermata
**chordata
***urochordata
****larvaceans
****styleid + pyurid ascidies
****molgulid ascidies
****phlebobranch ascidies + thaliaceans
****? vetulicolia (+)
***others chordata (not named actually)
****cephalochordata
****craniata (vertbrates)
Fenkys 16:01, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Rational Recovery

message: http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/26524365 -- Scarpy (talk) 00:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journal? 

message: What is Stanton Peele's relationship with Rational Recovery? Has Rational Recovery supported these court efforts? Have they responded to or celebrated these court efforts? What do these court decisions mean for Rational Recovery as a movement and an organization? Right now, it's not clear that this section is connected to Rational Recovery. Let's make these connections explicit. Daask (talk) 02:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court-mandated 12-step program attendance 

message: From the second paragraph:
" Some assistance is free; a "teaser, if you will. Then, though, this "bait and switch" approach..."
No. Uh uh. That's not neutral.
From the third:
"Trimpey conjurs this opinion and sells it as fact"
A little further along:
"Trimpley is widely dismissed, however he has established a loyal spate of desperate minions."
Are you joking? There's no place for this invective in an encyclopedia article, accurate or not. The colloquial nature alone makes those turns of phrase unacceptable.
I know the last thing this article needs is another anon jumping in the fray, so this clearly requires admin. intervention. Reduction to a stub & locked would be preferable at this point. Embarrassingly bad text here, this is the sort of thing that gets WP made fun of. Fix it.
97.90.241.210 (talk) 13:22, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please revert (rewrite?) this article to npov and LOCK 

message: I don't know about any controversy about this program; all I know is that the link is broken.  I'm removing it for now.  Twin Bird (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link is broken.
Talk:Battle of Megiddo

message: Excellent!Ortolan88
Its a good thing to state that only some believe Har Megiddo to be the location of a future battle.
Another interpretation would be that of going strictly by the literal verse that states that the nations will assemble there and nothing else.
The scenario allows for the events portrayed in Ezekiel, Zechariah, and Revelations in which an army assembles at the coast, ascends and takes Jerusalem only to die on the mountains of Israel.
66.231.160.142 05:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Spanking

message: Hello everyone, the German article can be found as following:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6rperstrafe#K%C3%B6rperstrafen_in_der_Kindererziehung
I don't have the time to add the language link myself (or find out how to do it in the first place), could someone else please do it?
--2001:8003:4E77:D900:106E:6651:EE0A:E22A (talk) 01:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Subject 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gray mare. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gray mare" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Flogging frame. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 4#Flogging frame until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 07:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Flogging frame" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Ass-whuppin' has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ass-whuppin']]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sherlock Holmes

message: Do we really need to say he's the arguably the best known fictional detective in the lead? Practically all sources agree that he is the most famous fictional detective. I think 'arguably' should be omitted. Jack234567 (talk) 11:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: One could also argue that Hercule Poirot is. In the absence of irrefutable evidence (or at least a large scale survey), having a qualifier is safer. Ponsonby100 (talk) 12:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arguably the best known?? 

message: "In "The Solitary Cyclist", Holmes visits a country pub to make enquiries regarding a certain Mr Woodley which resulted in violence." -- mixed tenses, should be "result". 64.223.97.117 (talk) 21:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed edit, under 'Personal Combat' 

message: I found a thesis (a master's thesis?) about translation Sherlock Holmes into Indonesian, though I don't know how helpful this is to the article as I haven't read the whole thing https://eprints.uny.ac.id/21089/1/Andy%20Setyanta%2007211141017.pdf WhisperToMe (talk) 04:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indonesian translation notes 

message: Shouldn't it be redirected here from the "Sherlock" page? Gadir (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't think so, there are other things people could be looking for such as that TV series. Jack234567 (talk) 05:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: I've just finished reading Julian Barnes's 2005 novel Arthur & George. Highly recommended for Doyle aficionados.
On page 44 he says Doyle initially called his detective Sheridan Hope, then Sherringford Holmes, until finally settling on Sherlock Holmes.
Is this established fact, or just Barnes's novelistic whimsy? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Early versions of his name
Talk:Tin foil hat

message: The latest edits reminded me of these other styles (I couldn't resist). —PaleoNeonate – 03:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style variations 

message: Hello, I believe I may have found a new, older use of the concept of tin foil hats dating back to 1863, just under half a century older than the oldest reference currently in this article. It is in the book "Hedderwick's Miscellany of Instructive and Entertaining Literature", p.334. The book doesn't discusses tin foil hats in reference to the common stereotypes associated with them today but rather "Building a ferocious monarch". I don't know if this is actually related or just tin foil hats being used in some unrelated way but though it could be useful to mention. Feel free to check out the source and determine whether it should be added to the article or just ignored.Resolving (talk) 07:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New possible origin of 'Tin foil hat/helmet' found 

message: Specifically https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_Ship_(Pohl_novel) where toward the end of the novel, telepaths (including the protagonist) must use close-fitting tin-foil hats (not the "dunce cone" type shown in this article, but an all-over wrap) to protect themselves from the invading extraterrestrials.  What I don't know is whether this is an inspiration for or inspired by the anti-government thing.  (Or, indeed, if they are both derived from something earlier.)  Steveread999 (talk) 18:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another early reference to the shielding aspect... 

message: There's an addition at the end of the end of the first paragraph that is an united opinion: "as well as a popular derogative to shame out holders of dissident views, similar to former days' disciplinary use of a dunce cap." There is also an almost identical addition at the end of the first paragraph in the second section. Toadrain (talk) 19:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited opinion
Talk:Emmer wheat

message: I removed "was", since it according to the article is still used in Ethiopia. -- JeLuF— Preceding undated comment added 04:09, 16 June 2002 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I tagged the redirect using Archer to acknowledge the article was merged. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 21:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged
Talk:George Washington

message: I am not sure this is correctly described as "inconsequential".  I found it easily by searching the Web, and as for reliable secondary sources, it can be found in Chernow, page 632. Bruce leverett (talk) 22:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Letter to Touro synagogue 

message: The painting's title is Washington as Master Mason, but the caption underneath the photo reads Washington as Master of his Lodge. These are two different things: Master Mason is a stage in the Masonic degree structure, whereas "Master of his Lodge" signifies holding the Progressive Office of Worshipful Master. Additionally, something must be amiss chronologically: an 1870 rendering of the 1793 event - how can the painting be dated to before the event it depicts?
Nuttyskin (talk) 13:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have given the image a more descriptive caption:  – Cheers. Drdpw (talk) 17:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Washington as Master Mason'' 

message: the article refers to "the Constitutional Convention in 1787, which drafted and ratified the Constitution." this sounds wrong, unless ratify has a meaning other than the one I'm familiar with. it was , of course, events in the several states that ratified the constitution. Obugov (talk) 02:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected – The convention did not ratify the Constitution, neither did it establish the U.S. federal government. Drdpw (talk) 02:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ratified
Talk:Stephen Crane

message: Some footnotes on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Crane are incomplete and unhelpful.  In particular, #Secondary_sources lists three such books by Paul Sorrentino:
(1)  Sorrentino, Paul. 2006. Student Companion to Stephen Crane. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-33104-9.
(2)  Sorrentino, Paul. 2014. Stephen Crane: A Life of Fire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0674049536.
(3)  Wertheim, Stanley and Paul Sorrentino. 1994. The Crane Log: A Documentary Life of Stephen Crane, 1871–1900. New York: G. K. Hall & Co. ISBN 0-8161-7292-7.
Five of the 250 footnotes refer to works of Paul Sorrentino, as shown below.
 40.  Sorrentino, pp. 34–35.
188.  Sorrentino, Life of Fire, p 11
194.  Sorrentino, Life of Fire, p. 131
196.  Sorrentino, Life of Fire text, p. 25
202.  Sorrentino, p. 59.
Of these, 188, 194, and 196 are helpful, but 40 and 202 significantly less so, as the specific works by Paul Sorrentino are omitted.
In relatively minor matters:
(1)  a period after p in 188 should be included,
(2)  italicized "text" in 196 should likely be removed,
(3)  use of the subtitle rather than the complete title in 188, 194 & 196, while certainly better than nothing, may violate a Wikipedia standard. FGS math (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnotes 

message: See above for citation issues (another issue is that most sources are lacking isbns or other identifiers as appropriate). There is also some unsourced content, and I'm skeptical that the article meets the standard for well researched and comprehensive. For example the 2014 scholarly biography is only cited a couple times despite being more recent and higher quality than other sources cited to a greater extent. (t · c) buidhe 05:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR needed