Talk:Chrysiridia rhipheus

message: I added a Gallery picture I believe it shows the colour of the wings better than the other "thumb" picture. I think both are worthy to be up so I thought this would be the most effect way. -- IvanTortuga 22:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Right. I will place notes to look at or fix as I go. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OK, begin GA review notes... 

message: I will pass it as GA as I feel it passes the criteria now. I fixed up a few typos. If you want to go for FAC, there would be more info to gather. This is where having more info on life cycle, nectar sources, and folklore, as well as collector status and how/who ranks which lepidopteran is the 'best' etc, plus the prose could be gone over by another copyeditor. If you want to do this, and are able to get sources one day, give me a heads up. GA is a good 'staging point' to sit on until then. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA passed 

message: Drury's Illustrations of Natural History, see p.40, James Duncan's Foreign Butterflies, see p.205Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 19:26, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Encyclopédie méthodique, ou par ordre de matières, 1819, has a nice description, page 709, Dictionnaire classique des sciences naturelles, drawn by DrapiezPro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 03:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: De uitlandsche kapellen voorkomende in de drie waereld-deelen : Asia, Africa en America = Papillons exotiques des trois parties du monde : l'Asie, l'Afrique et l'Amerique:  , At McGill. Go to McLennan Library Building, 3459 McTavish Street [Map], Montreal, Quebec H3A 1Y1. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 03:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other name 

message: Uraniinae phylogeny after Lees et al 1991Lees, David C. and Smith, Neal G. (1991) "Foodplants of the Uraniinae (Uraniinae) and their Systematic, Evolutionary and Ecological Significance. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, vol. 45. available at http://research.yale.edu/peabody/jls/pdfs/1990s/1991/1991-45(4)296-Lees.pdf
(1) Use Endospermum as a food plant.
(2) Use Omphalea as a food plant   and adults are diurnal. Urapterita is not included for lack of data.
I had a look at your sandbox. What about this cladogram? As far as I can tell Lees et al doesn't say if Chrysiridia is a clade, nor any of the other genera, which means  cladogram might not be so good to include after all. It might be on the larger side though, better perhaps to have it like your first cladogram and not include genera after Alcides. Where should note (2) be? (In brief:I can't make up my mind) Narayanese (talk) 20:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "genera after Alcides". Do you mean only the diurnal genera (i.e. Alcides, Urania and Chrysiridia)? With or without species? Note (2) should include Alcides, Urania and Chrysiridia. The "bigger" cladogram in my sandbox is wrong. Here is the corrected, with new cladogram. The genera are clear enough in the cladogram, but the relation of the specific species isn't given, so I after thinking a little I wouldn't place species. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 02:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I meant only the diurnal genera.But without knowing if the genera are monophyletic (I suppose Chrysiridia is given the distribution, but I would like a source saying so), perhaps the best thing would be to put the cladogram of genera into Uraniinae (I'll do that now) and leave this article without a cladogram, since I don't think it would be useful without seeing the species here. Narayanese (talk) 21:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 21:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cladogram 

message: Should we render the common name as "Madagascan Sunset Moth" or "Madagascan sunset moth"? The article currently uses both. Melchoir (talk) 08:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm uncapitalizing. I know that issue can be controversial, but if we can't even agree within the same article, we should either comply with MOS:LIFE or change that guideline. Art LaPella (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: What does 'spp' abreviate. Can we spell it out or wlink it, please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:23, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The answer to your first question is at Species#Abbreviated names. Art LaPella (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Females lay about 80 eggs under the leaves of Omphalea spp. " (lede) 

message: How did a species article make it to featured without even a conservation status, let alone a paragraph about it? Anybody has any information?complainer (talk) 22:15, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The page use to have a "Not evaluated (IUCN 3.1)" status in the infobox, but that was removed. I am for it's inclusion, but what that says is really that nobody has bothered to check the moth's conservation status. The section on distribution and habitat has the rest of the information available on the matter. This is an insect, not everything about it is known, even without a paragraph about conservation the article summarizes what is known. Regards, Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 00:11, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Conservation

message: Substituted at 11:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chrysiridia rhipheus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070315165351/http://research.yale.edu/peabody/jls/pdfs/1990s/1991/1991-45%284%29296-Lees.pdf to http://research.yale.edu/peabody/jls/pdfs/1990s/1991/1991-45%284%29296-Lees.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chrysiridia rhipheus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20141112144811/http://blog.dispatchesfromthevanishingworld.com/?p=3754 to http://blog.dispatchesfromthevanishingworld.com/?p=3754
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chrysiridia rhipheus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080612130953/http://www.nikonsmallworld.com/gallery.php?grouping=search&sp=Urania%20ripheus&st=az&imagepos=1 to http://www.nikonsmallworld.com/gallery.php?grouping=search&sp=Urania%20ripheus&st=az&imagepos=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: seems to say the same thing twice. Iridescence is the property of producing colour by optical interference. I edited this to  I was reverted by  with the summary "while shorter, proposed change obscured that only the iridescent parts do not contain pigment". Now, it seems far from obvious that the red version implies this, and, this isn't stated (or sourced) anywhere in the article. Thoughts? John (talk) 09:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any response here, I have changed it back to the green version. John (talk) 19:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: The link in note 1 leads to the correct page: Louis Francois Jéhan, Dictionnaire zoologique ... Bd. 14; the text of no 1 about the persecution of the church and the edition of Migne is certainly an error. Unfortunately, I don't know how to change the text of a link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.193.224.234 (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in note 1