Talk:Sally Kirkland

message: Is no better picture available?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.0.113.203 (talk) 01:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I've removed the link again.  No offense is intended.  I'm sure that this institute is important to her, but it needs to be demonstrated with a verifiable, reliable source.  Then the institute could be mentioned in the body of the article itself, and references given to both the source and to the institute itself.  Linking to the institute from the External links section without any mention of it elsewhere looks like an attempt at promotion, which goes against WP:EL and WP:SPAM. --Ronz 17:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (Removed) This link is important to Sally Kirkland's life work. I am restoring it. Ronz, please leave me alone. (Removed). Thank you. Ilena 17:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's the way you feel about people trying to help you then maybe it's time to start taking everyone's advise to heart - Wikipedia is not a place for your hostility. --Ronz 21:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Ilena, if you cannot support your edits with verifiable resources, then you will forever see your edits be removed.  It's nothing personal.  It's how editing on wikipedia is done.    I've given you detailed guidance on how to get the content you want into this article.  I'm sorry that you've chosen to attack me rather than take my help for what it is. --Ronz 22:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the references slightly.  It still needs a verifiable source, and any editor has full right to remove the institute link until supporting source is added. --Ronz 22:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually looking a little more, it does not seem much more than a place where anyone can publish a piece.  Not sure if this is useful for wikipedia.  Anyone heard of this site before? David D. (Talk) 06:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I went ahead and switched it to an external link. -- Dēmatt (chat) 18:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The arguments above still stand, plus the more times it's added without addressing the issues above, the more it looks promotional. --Ronz 19:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went through that, too, then I did a Google search and the Institute does exist,,, .  It seems to be part of Sally Kirkland's life. The question then became, why not link it?  I couldn't come up with a good reason.  -- Dēmatt (chat) 19:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. There is no good reason to delete it now. -- Levine2112 discuss 02:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  See my previous arguments.  We could use better sources for verification, and it would be better to introduce it as a properly sourced reference rather than an external link.  --Ronz 21:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry misread the last paragraph about her activities about breast implants.  I still think that the two external links should be removed.  --Crohnie 14:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the IMDB link is pretty useful since it is being kept up to date.  I might be wrong, but I think it's fairly standard to include IMDB for actors. --Ronz 15:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kirkland Institute for Implant Survival Syndrome

message: I have a lot of information and background on Ms Kirkland. I am not sure what sources are being requested to take the questionability away from this article. If someone would specifically let me know what is needed I feel certain I can locate the information and references. She has been the subject of much press and several articles have been written about her that I have access to. Thank you. I look forward to working here to make this a fine, encyclopeia article. Ilena 18:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore) is an example of a well-sourced article. --Ronz 00:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What sources are needed? 

message: Her status as an academy nominee is not in doubt.  But the whole category is being deleted so there is no point trying to revert the bot. See the  discussion here.  David D. (Talk) 18:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Thanks. Ilena 19:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Academy nominee

message: "In recent years, Kirkland's fashion sense has gained a cult following and raised eyebrows."  I removed this from the article because it's unsourced and could be taken as ridicule.  Per WP:BLP I don't think it should be reintroduced. -- Ronz  00:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fashion sense

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sally Kirkland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140502211533/http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi/f/findaid/findaid-idx?c=wiarchives;view=reslist;subview=standard;didno=uw-whs-tape00339a to http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi/f/findaid/findaid-idx?c=wiarchives;view=reslist;subview=standard;didno=uw-whs-tape00339a
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified