lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thomas Overbury

message: "Copper vitriol" (or "blue vitrioL") is an old term for copper sulfate.  It's toxic, but not all that poisonous and certainly poisoning by it has nothing to do with sulfuric acid (although, of course, copper sulfate is initially formed by the action of sulfuric acid on copper or certain copper compounds).  See the article on copper sulfate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.214.59.212 (talk) 01:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sulfuric acid and copper vitriol

message: Where did Overbury attend school? Was this Stratford-upon-Avon or Shipston-on-Stour? If Stratford, would he have known Edmund Shakespeare or even William Shakespeare. Having travelled to Edinburgh (note Macbeth) and the Low Countries (note Hamlet) could he have been of use to Shakespeare? Overbury was a poet and he had studied at Oxford University getting a BA. He studied law and mixed with the royal court and high society meeting many influential people and probably having access to many historical records and accounts. Possibly had the ear of the King. So then, could he be the key to Shakespeare's success? If you doubt my questions, then doubt that the Cobbe portrait is Shakespeare (and not Overbury).
Hi - I'm not sure how to format this. Was just hoping somebody could clear the article up a bit. There are several conflicting dates in the section on his death. I'll have to look elsewhere to be sure of the correct version, but it'd be good if someone who knows the history could fix this. I don't want to edit it myself in case I make a mistake!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.128.238 (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting Questions

message: The text says "during the trials of the six accused in late 1616 and early 1616".  I am pretty sure that the first year should be 1615, but am reluctant to correct this until someone can confirm it. Tifoo (talk) 07:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect year

message: It's a bit confusing for a casual reader to have the article refer to Carr, Rochester, and Somerset, when they're all the same person. So, until somebody comes up with a better solution, I've changed them all to Carr. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names 

message: This article talks too much about his private life an too little about what he wrote. Maybe add a list with publications and dates?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.249.244 (talk) 18:31, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works? 

message: His poem is also referred to as The Wife.  I've standardized the title to A Wife because it seems to be the most common.  I've also relocated the citation to the first mention of the poem in the article.Twistlethrop (talk) 02:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Wife poem
Talk:Supersymmetry breaking

message: The scale can be covered within the scope of the parent article. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 17:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Supersymmetry breaking scale]] into [[Supersymmetry breaking]]
Talk:Teltron tube

message: Is it possible to make the electron beam fly on a knot trajectory by external electric and/or magnetic fields? --Calvin12345 01:37, 45 June 2007 (UTC)

message: This article was proposed for deletion on 15 January 2007.  The consensus was keep. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teltron Tube --Bejnar 01:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kept after AfD

message: Is there any emission of X rays by the Teltron tube?
The answer is a very little amount - much less than the old cathode ray tubes used in black and white televisions. 77.101.217.249 (talk) 12:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  X rays 
Talk:UA2 experiment

message: Extended article. Will add pictures later and info on the discovery of the top quark. I do think this article need an infobox on SPS experiments, similar to the one on LHC. As new editor I dodnt know how to make one Idastorehaug (talk) 13:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You can look at  and create a similar template at . Don't worry about screwing things up, nothing will show up in articles until you put the template in the page. Just be bold and experiment with things. If you need help, you can always ask at WT:PHYS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments by Idastorehaug
Talk:Geoffrey Unsworth

message: "...including Zoran Perisic, an animation stand crew member from 2001, who extended Kubrick's front projection technique for Superman..."
To the best of my knowledge, there are no scenes using front projection. Superman has some exceptional rear projection -- sometimes being quite undetectable, even when you know -- but no front projection. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 12:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: front projection?

message: German WP says he was born in April 1914.  How do they know even the month, when no other versions go beyond just "1914"?   Why don't we know his actual date of birth?   -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 20:06, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Birth index shows 1914 is correct. Though it doesn't confirm the month. Crisso (talk) 16:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It turns out the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography added an entry for him earlier this year, which confirms his birth date. Here is an article about it http://www.yourindependent.co.uk/3506/Atherton-born-Double-Oscar-Winner-Honoured.html. Crisso (talk) 13:30, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, Crisso.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Upsilon meson

message: The symbol of the Upsilon should be ramshorned (ϒ) and not look like a plain letter Y. Unfortunately the wrong symbol is generated by something I don'd understand. Did I hear you saying wiki editing is easy??? 84.165.26.200 (talk) 09:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong symbol

message: Please give input at Talk:Hadron#Hadron overhaul. Thanks. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 02:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hadron overhaul 

message: From upsilon: In particle physics the capital Greek letter Υ denotes an Upsilon particle. Note that the symbol should always look like \,\Upsilon in order to avoid confusion with a Latin Y denoting the hypercharge. 
Headbomb, the Latin upsilon Y doesn't show up on many browsers and it's not supported by WP fonts. In addition, it's wrong. So stick a \,\Upsilon in it. SBHarris 23:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Latin upsilon in this article is wrong
Talk:Vector boson

message: I am looking for a date and person to who, and when, the term 'Intermediate Vector Boson' was coined or first introduced to describe a vector boson.  I had an event that I feel that may have been a 'decay product' that formed as a result of an Intermediate Vector Boson.  71.107.66.58 (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intermediate Vector Boson 
Talk:Sancharnet

message: So suggest merging. Internet Archive shows it went until either 2009 or 2010? Actually the domain name no longer works, but http://www.bsnl.co.in/service/internet_tariff.htm#4mb might imply that they still offer the service? However that page says copyright 2008? W Nowicki (talk) 00:06, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct?
Talk:Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

message: THE CHAIRMAN OF TRAI IS DR. JS SHARMA. HE REPLACED NRIP[ENDRA SHARMA ON MAY 14.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.91.176.214 (talk) 18:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chairman

message: I have reported copyvio in the History section of the article for potential copyright violation from the TRAI's official website: http://trai.gov.in/Content/History.aspx
::Copy pasted section has been removed. KhaasBanda (talk) 03:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Copyvio 

message: To the Pm Of India
*(मेहेरबानि करके उडिशा BSNL 3G MOBILE service सुधारा याए ते बहत बेहतर होगा.तिन महिने से निआळी उडिशा 754004 के BSNL 3G MOBILE service खराब हे .किसिभि तरहा का कारवाि कियाजा निहिँ रहा हे.बराय मेहेरबानि इसे सुधारा जायतो बेहतर होगा.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.227.75.154 (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  गावँ के लेगँ को लिय bsnl odisha का बेमातृ मनोबृति
Talk:X boson

message: I think that this article should be merged with Y boson, like W and Z bosons, because they are related in same way.--83.131.25.72 11:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Months have passed and no one merged it... --83.131.77.66 15:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:ZEUS (particle detector)

message: This article is in need of a total revamp.  Lets try and fix it up so people can find it useful.  Jason Schwartz 18:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp 

message: How should we organize this article?
Although, I am a newcomer, I will give a suggestion and please propose an alternative:
1. Introduction:
2. History
3. Detector:
3.1 CTD
3.2 CAL
3.3: MVD
3.4 MUON
3.5 BAC
3.6 LUMI
4. Construction
4.1 Development
4.2 Maintenance
5. Experimental results
6. Trivia???   
Feel free to add or take away.
Jason Schwartz 18:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Outline 

message: Picking up from @Jason Schwartz and @Jferrando, here is a proposal for edits for correctness and consistency with the DESY main article as well as for grammar and tense consistency. The proposed changes are underlined.''
 Redactrice at DESY (talk) 15:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly done:  I implemented some of your requests. Statements such as "the ZEUS detector measured 12 m × 11 m × 20 m and weighed 3600 tons" and "laying the foundation to much of the science done at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the CERN particle physics laboratory today" need independent sourcing. PK650 (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @PK650 Another belated thanks. I have added references for the dimensions of the ZEUS detector and for the HERA physics legacy statement. Please review. Thanks! Redactrice at DESY (talk) 08:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit proposals 

message: * ZEUS homepage
* List of publications
* ZEUS experiment record on INSPIRE-HEP
:Category:Buildings and structures in Altona, Hamburg
:Category:Particle experiments
Redactrice at DESY (talk) 15:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: —Quondum 20:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Countryside Stewardship Scheme

message: I think this page needs updating because it has not been updated since October 2005 and is clearly out of date. I don't know much about the subject so I am unable to do so.--88.105.187.200 13:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requires Update 
Talk:The Million Pound Note

message: Isn't that a Ponzi-scheme?--80.141.219.160 (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The businesses that Adams patronized did not invest any money with him, nor did they expect to get back more than the fair value of their goods/services. They just gave him stuff on credit. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But nothing of all that money really belongs to him. And this cannot go on forever. If not a Ponzi-scheme, then what is his method called? It strongly reminds me of the crisis we are currently facing worldwide.--80.141.201.141 (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In a Ponzi scheme, the crook gets money which he is supposed to invest, with the promise of a fat return. Adams only got products and services and he did not offer to later pay more than they were worth. He was just buying on credit. It wasn't all that different from using a credit card. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The gold mine is a textbook example of a pump and dump stock swindle, "artificially inflating the price of an owned stock through false and misleading positive statements, in order to sell the cheaply purchased stock at a higher price."   After incurring at least 6000 pounds in debts (the equivalent of a million dollars today) which he had no way to pay back, he got stock with borrowed money, drove the price up to 20,000 pounds, telling the "widows" to "buy, buy, buy," while he was selling. Will Sandberg (talk) 04:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ponzi scheme]]? 

message: By the way: A BBC story headed “Who, What, Why: Could the US get a $1tn platinum coin?” at 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20951417
solemnly says that the 1954 movie’s title is “The Million Dollar Note” yet cutely provides a hyperlink to the present Wikipedia article headed “The Million Pound Note” as if nobody will notice the discrepancy. 
Not even the title that Mark Twain gave to his short story mentions “dollar”.
Let’s see whether the BBC issues a correction.
Leigh Oats (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC says the 1954 movie is “The Million Dollar Note”
Talk:Hague Convention on Parental Responsibility and Protection of Children

message: The article describes an important bit of international legislation which one would hope that between the time it was created and now, someone with an interest and knowledge of the subject would have devoted time in expanding to be a more worthwhile source of information on this convention.
However, as at today, there has been no interest apart from adding templates and removing a line which explains why its implementation has been in limbo in the European Union.
Its shameful that this treaty has been delayed because of the reasons given and its also a shame that nobody else here cares to assist in reformatting and improving the quality of the Wikipedia article. --Gibnews 13:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and almost two years after your comment, the article does not have a list of signators.  We need to get a list of countries that have signed at a level of confidence in the reference that far exceeds the norm at WP.  We also need to know through court cases whether the signatures of various countries is enforced in law in those countries.  Signing means nothing; practical implementation at the level of courts and resolution of disputes in a lawful and fair manner is the ultimate test. Doug youvan (talk) 06:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: updated; will provide a country list as well. Reduced the quotation by the UK MP a bit and stated only the facts for this (regrettable) delay. It seems now things are moving! L.tak (talk) 13:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve the Article

message: How shall we decide if and how we will report individual cases? Often those get news reports (at least in the 1980 convention they do),and those reports are almost always one-sided and might leave  to continuing the dispute here. In the case before for example, it is possible that under the 1980 convention return was refused; or the US woman did not want to start proceedings in Russia...
On the other hand they provide useful insight in the workings of the convention. My suggestion is to use those additions to see where the article lacks general info (in the case of the article today: the discussion, which is reported in reliable sources) of the choice for the 1980 Child Abduction Convention and this convention in terms of range (1996 convention wins) and speed (1980 convention (should) win). Only extremely widely discussed cases should be added; or those leading to significant case law…. Ideas welcome! L.tak (talk) 09:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  specific case
Talk:Russett, Maryland

message: I don't want to be self-serving, and I appreciate the additional photos from Thisisbossi for the article. That said, I don't think the new "skyline" photo in the info-box is an improvement.  I thought there was already too much road and too little landscape and building profile in the photo I had added.  The new one, though, doesn't seem to show anything but road.  What do other people think?  HDow (talk) 22:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, didn't notice that the parameter is explicitly looking for a skyline photo.  I agree that yours shows more of skyline, so I've swapped your photo back in.  One problem is that because it's pretty much just a typical residential subdivision: Russett doesn't really have a skyline to begin with -- it's actually a bit of a stretch for the neighborhood to have its own article in the first place.  It's tough to get a good skyline photo from within the community -- a good angle may be from the Savage MARC area along Brock Bridge Road, looking south across Konterra's Annapolis Junction property. I think that's at a higher elevation where you can at least see a couple rooftops and chimneys among the trees, and some lightning shines through the trees at night.  My only issue with your photo is the bit of car showing on the bottom-right corner.  That could probably be cropped out without impacting the photo too much.    --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 23:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skyline Photo
Talk:Alcator C-Mod

message: eg ion temps, densities, confinement times and hence fusion triple product achieved under various conditions. - Rod57 (talk) 05:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more on plasma parameter improvements with time 

message: Following completion of operations at the end of September 2016, the facility has been placed into safe shutdown
Since (especially for a test reactor) the worst accidents would likely be a magnet quench or accidental tritium release, is it even necessary to mention that this was a "safe shutdown"?  It implies that a fusion test reactor was shut down unsafely or by some catastrophic accident at some point, making the safe shutdown notable...  --A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 06:51, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording of shutdown
Talk:Emily O'Brien

message: Emily is also involved with doing video game motion capture for http://image-metrics.com/ MikeSims (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Projects

message: Just out of curiosity. How do we know she is the voice of Camille? Before she gained attention for her role as Iman Avesta in Batman?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.96.103 (talk) 18:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camille  

message: The ending credits for Death Stranding state that O'Brien voiced both Amelie and Bridget Strand, with Wagner also being attributed as the voice of Bridget. Is this a mistake in the credits or is Bridget indeed voiced by both O'Brien and Wagner? Bluerules (talk) 23:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Stranding role 

message: So by the page, we only know what the sun news paper tells us 👌 94.173.17.182 (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Literally none of the sources are The Sun. So I have no idea what you're referring to... DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is she
Talk:Cathodic arc deposition

message: Opinions would be appreciated on whether this link: Arc evaporation process - A simple Flash animation showing the arc evaporation process would be an appropriate addition to the article.  Thanks.  -- SiobhanHansa 21:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No: Although the information appears solid, but (1) authorship is unknown (2) any references to reputable/verifiable sources of the provided information are absent. Therefore this website fails Wikipedia:verifiability criteria. `'Míkka 23:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Maybe:Wouldn't one not-completely-verifiable reference be better than none?  The page has some good (basic) information on the process.  And frankly, the wiki page that is linked to just states that some references are better than others and technically, while this isn't a "good" source, it's still at least ok (at elast that's my take on it).SmoJoe (talk) 22:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link opinions 

message: The articles are about the same process and should be merged.  Iepeulas (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger done Iepeulas (talk) 01:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge from [[Arc-PVD]] 

message: I know it can be difficult for certain Russian men to acknowledge this sort of thing, but cathodic arc depositon was being developed in other places besides Soviet Russia (infact, it was an inevitable mishap with experiments in magnetic sector mass separation).  An example is the precedent patent, US 3625848, Snaper, which broadly covers the effect, after which the later Sable patents listed here only receive relatively narrow claims (easily circumvented by said effect of cathodic arc deposition).  As much as I respect the work done there, and the many great Russian scholars, this article is a good deal of posturing.Wikibearwithme (talk) 05:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: lol I came to point out that at best doing no analysis myself or questioning the record, the correct and accurate statement in the article would be "The first documented viable commercial process was developed in the soviet union".  Since this technology represents a "Trivial" concept and was probably sketched on napkins by about 10,000 engineers by the 1960s.  The only claim that MIGHT be true is that the soviets were the first to focus on and succeed at optimizing this particular approach to the point that it became viable commerciall (while, of course, every other hypothetical approach to deposition was simultaneously being pursued by dozens of different research and commercial organizations, often many in parallel within each country).  That is the nature of many industrially significant technologies.67.165.123.62 (talk) 10:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Rather Typical Soviet Posturing Here
Talk:Pangbourne

message: Try to avoid stacking images.
See: Wikipedia:Picture_tutorial
Stu1024 13:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

message: "John Breedon senior bought the manor in 1671. He was High Sheriff of Berkshire and brother of the Governor of Arcadia and Nova Scotia, whose son later succeeded him."
(1) Nova Scotia was known as Acadia, not Arcadia.
(2) Who did the son succeed? His father or his uncle, or both?
--Oldontarian (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The person to ask would be User:Verica Atrebatum who added the text in 2006  and should know the source.SovalValtos (talk) 09:06, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentences
Talk:Charged particle

message: As a possible extension of this stub one could list, briefly describe and link detectors for charged particles.
* wire chambers
* scintillators
* semiconductors
and more. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  detection of charged particles 
Talk:Chlorine-36

message: Information about production rates would be useful  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.198.136.144 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled