lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Red army crimes in Lithuania

message: Comment: Since the author of the article has messed up the discussion by leaving comments all over the place, I have taken the liberty to copy his interventions and the text he commented on, here: ( --Pan Gerwazy 23:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone said the author of articel under discussion must leave answers after every disscussion part, "mess gatherer" say - there is only one place.
Wiki rules: debate is not only woting.Ttturbo 06:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The original author of the article under discussion doesn't have to leave any comments if he/she doesn't want to. The object of the exercise is that if the original author has a particular reason for wanting the article kept, he/she is welcome to advocate that. He/she should ideally explain that they have contributed heavily to the article, but that's a custom honoured more in the breach than the observance. Commenting after every single contribution is probably a bit much, particularly if there's nothing in particular to say. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from project page 

message: Ttturbo put all his threaded comment back on the project page, but forgot to put my threaded comment back, which has now disappeared from both pages. I wrote:
- **Comment And now User:Ttturbo is edit-warring with several other editors there, trying to establish links to this article. Even using anonymous IP to avoid 3RR. I suppose a short block may be in order. --Pan Gerwazy 15:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappeared comment
Wikipedia talk:Peer review/Donie Bush

message: I have spent some time editing and expanding the article on Donie Bush.  Bush was involved in professional baseball for 67 years in various capacities.  I have been writing for 30-plus years but am relatively new to Wikipedia and would appreciate comments on how to improve it.Cbl62 23:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Donie Bush]]
Talk:German submarine U-66 (1940)

message: I've set out some of the copyedits I've made in more detail here:
1. Changed one set of patrol dates (the seventh), in the infobox and the text - according to 'Uboat.net', the seventh 'outing' was not an official patrol.
2. Changed 'Christmas Day' - it is potentially ambiguous: e.g. Christmas is celebrated in Germany (and how many other countries, I wonder), on 24 December. '25' is more clear.
3. Changed 'ton' or 'tons' to 'GRT'. We're talking about merchant ships here.
4. Changed 'it' to 'she' to be consistent.
Because of the table, there's an awful lot of white space about three quarters of the way down the page.
Anyone got any ideas on how to fix it?
RASAM (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, you could employ a table of contents limiter, e.g. . Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedits
Talk:SM U-83

message: I've changed this:
"...(U-83) was ambushed by Farnboroughs hidden armaments when she approached too close..." 
Ambushed? This is a U-boat we are talking about, the quintessential ambush weapon. This is a case of "the biter bit", and the statement is too POV for here. Xyl 54 (talk) 11:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambush?
Talk:Warwick Hills Golf and Country Club

message: I didn't place the  on this article -- whoever did has said nothing about why he or she wishes for the article to stay. This article's a wreck, but Warwick Hills is a very notable golf course -- it's home to the Buick Open, a notable golf tournament. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested speedy
File talk:Ericson-A-Molano.jpg

message: God Bless you to as well.
Tell me, where do you write me from, your ministry?
Of course you can take the images that you need, is a
good thing to know that is a useful for projects of our page.
I imagine is a website you refer to?
God Bless You.
(My message)
God Bless You!!! Uh, I have a question, can you give me
permission to use one of your images of Ericson Alexander Molano
in Wikipedia?
-Vivian B.
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In English (from the Pastor)
Talk:Defender-class boat

message: The Wire (JTF-GTMO) has an article about Response Boat Small - Charlie, used to USCG contingent that provides port security
at Guantanamo. Is it the same as the Defender?  A variant?  Merely similar looking?  
The article implies these boats were first introduced in 2008, not 2003.
Here is the link -- page 3.
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 23:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: RBS can refer to any of the variants, it's just another name for it. I don't know anyone who actually calls it a "defender", everyone i know just refers to them as an "RBS". Hope this helps, — -dainomite   23:29, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  question... 

message: ¿What kind of measurements is “29 8.5ft. The length at the water line is 22 6.5 ft.”? ¿29 feet 8½ inches/22 feet 6½ inches? It’s nonsensical.174.25.7.35 (talk) 05:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ¿What is this?
Talk:GRAM 63 battle rifle

message: Photos of the GRAM63 show it using a magazine that closely resembles that of the FN FAL.  It is likely that it was in fact an FN FAL magazine, since using an existing and common magazine would both simplify design work and make good military sense.  But this is not documented.  Does anyone have any further information confirming or denying this?
This article needs a better image of the rifle.  One with a magazine inserted and the stock extended.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.221.121 (talk) 15:34, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magazine?
Talk:Vietnamese Pot-bellied

message: What creates these animals? Does it have abnormal digestive organs, or is it the result of spinal curvature? -Rolypolyman 23:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the belly?

message: The Dutch wiki page for this topic contains more info on the pet pig industry, which might be considered for adding to this section. Apparently it's only really popular in the states (though I assume also southeast asia?), and some breeders are actually trying to make them smaller by not giving them enough food, creating pot-bellied pigs that weigh in the range of 12 to 25 kilos (normally they weight around 65). This underfeeding is very very bad for the pigs' health and the practice is not included in the code of conduct developed by the North American Potbellied Pig Association (http://www.petpigs.com/nabredco.htm). --(71.191.72.148 (talk) 19:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pigs as Pets

message: I have a pretty good picture of a Vietnamese pot-bellied big, with the belly rather prominent, that I took on a trip a while ago. Do you think this article could use one of those? I'd gladly put it up for it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LisardggY (talk • contribs) 08:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another picture needed? 

message: According to the criteria listed in the article, all of the pigs shown are overweight. I would seem like a good idea to include a picture of a pig that is withing the correct weight range. Tad Lincoln (talk) 23:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: has (twice) partially removed the name "I" for this Vietnamese pig breed from the page, the second time apparently because "No I pig article exists". However, this is that article. The Vietnamese pig breed is called "I", in reliable English-language sources such as Mason. The "Vietnamese Pot-bellied Pig" was a short-lived fad in the United States for pigs of this type, but not necessarily of this breed. That exonym does not describe the Vietnamese breed, but American pigs that may (or may not) have derived from it. 
What's to be done? Move this to I (pig) and remove any irrelevant content about the pet pig fad? Split the page – into this article and a sub-stub on the "Pot-bellied"? Or leave it be? Any of these is fine with me. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The standard used on Wikipedia is the common name, and as such should remain as "Vietnamese Pot-bellied". --Dmol (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So what do you want to do? This article is about a Vietnamese pig breed, the Lon I; the "Vietnamese Pot-bellied" is not Vietnamese, and not a breed but a heterogenous type. Move it or split it? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the English wikipedia, so we should stick to English expressions. "I" removed in the article. Best Minoo (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinction between "Vietnamese Pot-bellied" and "I"
Talk:FM57 rifle

message: The FM57 was originally chambered for the then-current 6.5mmx55 cartridge.  Later versions were in 7.62mm NATO.
Article needs a photo of the FM57.
Article says nothing about the magazine used in the FM57.  Early versions used the 6.5mmx55 cartridge which will not fit in a 7.62mm NATO magazine such as that for the FN FAL rifle, and photos of 6.5mm FM57s indicate it did not use the existing 6.5mm magazine from the Swedish Browning Automatic Rifle variants Kg m/1921, m/1930 or m/1937.  Was it a new design specifically for the FM57?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.221.121 (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calibers
Talk:USCGC Campbell (WMEC-909)

message: I was stationed on this ship, so I have made some corrections/additions.
Campbell is fairly well known for having a helo crash on deck during flight-ops. No one was killed, however a few crewmen were thrown overboard with some injuries.
The Campbell has never had an integrated crew. However, there has been women on board temporarily and as officers (officers are not considered 'crew').  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Necrotec (talk • contribs) 16:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women on board / Helo crash 

message: I have expanded the page using resources available mostly on-line as references. Any print media citations for the major events of the ship's career would be welcome improvements--Rwberndt (talk) 20:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated and Expanded
Talk:Ukrainian patrol vessel Starobilsk

message: With a few citations, this article could probably get classified as B-class instead of start class.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.167.146.130 (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations 

message: P190 Sloviansk and P191 Starobilsk or P191 Sloviansk and P190 Starobilsk ??? --Юе Артеміс (talk) 05:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: STATEMENT_OF_WORK_FIRE_ALARM_SYSTEM_CONTRACT.DOC : P-190 "SLOVIANSK" (ex-USCGC CUSHING WPB 1321), P-191 "STAROBILSK" (ex-USCGC DRUMMOND WPB 1323)  --Юе Артеміс (talk) 13:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:NNS Okpabana

message: There's plenty of material out there to reference and expand the article with. Shouldn't be too hard to get this up to GA status. Anyone fancy a challenge. Mjroots (talk) 19:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I thought that ship article titles follow notability ("the most notable" or "the most recent notable" name). Can't see why this article moved already - indeed, only joined the Nigerian Navy on 7 May. Davidships (talk) 22:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Template talk:EstonianPMs

message: Mäe was the local head of a "self administered" Generalbezirk Estland, a part of Reichskommissariat Ostland, and he is correctly listed in that article. He was never the head of the Estonian republic, until you find an acceptable source that states that he was, I will remove his name from this template. Note that Quisling is not listed in Template:NorwegianPrimeMinisters either, so for consistency Mäe should not be listed in this template. Martintg 23:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mäe should not be included
Talk:USCGC Northland

message: I found this page and noticed it was essentially acting as a disambiguation page, so I turned it into one. Also, the history for WPG-49 lies in a DANFS article as Coast Guard ships during WW2 fell under US Navy command. At least this is the ship that appears to meet the definition of "Cutter Northland". These two links:
* John A. Tilley, "The Coast Guard & the Greenland Patrol"
* USCGC Northland's Website
where also on the main page as references and can still be used to fill out remaining information. --Brad (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguating Northland
Talk:USCGC Redbud

message: The following was uncited and no references were found in quick web search or material on the ship. Particular information is doubtful.
In August 1969 she rescued eight Swiss explorers from their small ice-battered boat which was beset in the ice pack as they attempted to enter the harbor of the Eskimo village of Kulusuk, Greenland.  This rescue of the members of the 1969 East Greenland Expedition of the Academic Alpine Club from Berne, Switzerland, was executed by the Redbud in a  wind in heavy ice under the command of CAPT Leyman W. Couch, USN.  The Swiss party had left Kulusuk on the east coast of Greenland,  south of the Arctic Circle, on 24 July 1969 to scale Rytterknegten on Knud Rasmussen Glacier, and were returning to base when they were beset in the ice.  None of the explorers was injured.
In particular "under the command of CAPT Leyman W. Couch, USN" makes no sense for a ship in service with MSTS that are civilian crewed. Web searches on key words of incident, including "Leyman W. Couch, USN" and "Leyman W. Couch" only give circular referenced to this Wikipedia piece. Palmeira (talk) 22:54, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted rescue account
Talk:Shaphat

message: How do you pronounce "Shaphat"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.149.45.140 (talk) 23:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: I'm not sure if I can actually start an AfD so I'm putting it here, this page is not notable whatsoever. It has no secondary sources to establish notability and the only primary source is using him to describe his son. In the Bible people are described as [blank] son of [blank] everywhere, its basically a last name to make it more specific on what Elisha of many Israelites it could describe, like Jesus of Nazareth or Mary Magdalene. He has no type of source establishing notability so I propose it be deleted.Schroeswald (talk) 19:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Nelson Bragg

message: I performed a copy edit of this article today in order to improve overall grammar, cohesion, etc. However, I feel that this article needs a full rewrite in order to be accurate as possible. Also, as I am no expert on music, I would also recommend that someone from WikiProject Music or a similar WikiProject also check the article for errors. Cheers, Freebirds Howdy! 01:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Re-write

message: Steel Derrick Music, I have rolled back your edits after noticing that you have altered information that was sourced and appears to be wrong at first glance. Could you please explain your edits? Even matters like birth place as 'Rockport, Massachusetts' which is sourced to the MTV bio was changed to Dover, New Hampshire without providing a reference and goes directly against a reliable source. Please explain this. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by Steel Derrick Music 
Talk:USNS Paoli

message: What was the namesake of this ship? Perhaps Paoli, Pennsylvania, but there are many other possibilites listed at Paoli, a disambiguation page. --DThomsen8 (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namesake? 

message: In most cases, when a ship serves under two different names, it gets two different sections in one article, yet it appears that someone split this article and the one on the SS Marine Floridian. Why? They are the exact same ship, under two different names! I could maybe see doing this if both sections were lengthy and packed with information. In that case, it would make sense to split them, but only to prevent an overly long and ponderous article. This splits what would be one short article about a WW2 tanker-turned-into-a-commercial-tanker into two stubs about the same exact thing. There is no reason to have two articles on the same ship, except to artificially inflate a count of articles. I'm pretty sure WP policy is to try to minimize number of articles, so when two articles are talking about the same ship under two different names, they should be merged into a single article. One article on a single ship should never be split into two, without very good reasons..45Colt 06:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - move here relevant content from SS Marine Floridian, then use that page to redirect to USNS Paoli (T-AO-157). Regards, DPdH (talk) 20:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are their separate articles on the same ship?
Talk:Marko Krizin

message: I have mostly seen him referred to in Catholic literature in English as above.  Is it possible to include this or to have it as a search item that directs to this page?  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark of Krizevci 
Talk:SafetyLit

message: SafetyLit is a bibliographic database and weekly update of recently published scholarly literature - a free service (presented without advertising) supported by the World Health Organization and by several US state and federal organizations. It contains no advertising. It is a service similar to PubMed (also free) and PsycINFO (a fee-based service). While PubMed has a bio-medicine focus and PsycINFO a behavioral focus, SafetyLit is multidisciplinary but selects articles of the many disciplines that are relevant to the issues of injury prevention and safety promotion. I suggest that including PsycINFO and the ISI Web of Science -- both commercial ventures -- makes the inclusion of SafetyLit appropriate by comparison. 
I have noticed that while Wikipedia contains many in-depth articles on other disciplines, there are relatively few on the science of safety. There are few biographic articles about key researchers and engineers of the past 200 years who contributed to the field. I hope to fill this gap by contributing several articles over the next few weeks. 
Davidl53 23:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SafetyLit Discussion
Talk:David Meirhofer

message: Nice job writing this article! I can't seem to find a picture of Meirhofer. >:( None of the articles on him back in 1974 carried a picture. ۝ ۞ ░ 16:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha! The beginning of this particular episode of the FBI Files clearly stated that names had been changed, nincompoop. Presumably they changed his name because although he confessed, he killed himself before he was tried and convicted. --202.134.251.206 (talk) 00:42, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The introduction and info box both say that Meirhofer had 16 victims, but only 4 are listed under the Victims section. If the other 12 victims were never identified, this section should note that; otherwise, it should be filled out with the names of the other victims.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattconz (talk • contribs) 23:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of victims incomplete?
Talk:IKK2

message: This article does not describe IKK2 in proper detail at all and is a very, very brief on what it does offer. IKK2 in neurology is emphisised here in this article, but by no means relflects the importance or amount of scientific literature associated with IKK2.
I'll spend some time on gathering the appropriate information and putting it into order. Before posting, hopefully I can collaborate with the creator of this article.
--Robertaylor (talk) 04:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, thanks Robert!  Your contributions will be a big help.  I doubt the person who created it is still around, but I'm willing to help out with whatever you need, at least in terms of writing and style, as I'm not an expert in the topic. Thanks again for being willing to lend your time to improving the project! delldot talk 17:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussing this article
Talk:Maryland House of Delegates

message: Is there a difference in how the party affiliation table looks in different browsers?  
To me, in Firefox on Windows, it looks like the image, with the color bars and party labels off by one column to the left.  But when I tried to fix it in July, somebody complained, somebody else called it "Confusing and misleading" and deleted it entirely, and a third person reverted to the edit before mine.  I assume there isn't some preference for misaligned party tables, so is there an unacknowledged discrepancy in how the table displays?  
— Infinitebuffalo (talk) 17:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliation table
Talk:USS Brennan

message: The link to John J Brennan takes you to the wrong person. The person listed is a British politician. The namesake of the ship is really based on that of the John Brennan linked below:
http://www.navsource.org/archives/06/013.htm
PrplFlavrdZombe (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namesake is wrong
Talk:Coup de glotte

message: The false vocal folds are NOT above the true vocal folds and are not involved in any way in the "coup de glotte". This can be asserted by viewing any anatomical chart of the human throat. The "false vocal folds" are BELOW the true vocal folds.  Please correct this bit of misinformation.
:You must have your anatomical book upside down, mate Carlmarche (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

message: Charles Lunn's book on the subject is here.
https://archive.org/details/cu31924021787068
100.15.120.162 (talk) 03:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lunn
Talk:Deadly Serious Party

message: What are the notability criteria for such parties?  The DSP certainly ran candidates in every election for over a decade.   It got the same newspaper notice as any such party gets.   During every election campaign there would be several mentions of it in each of the newspapers.  What more could one want?   Of course those newspaper archives are not easily accessible now, so I can't cite specific articles, but they were there all right.  So how are they less notable than any other joke party?  -- 64.131.244.143 (talk) 23:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I've noticed a disparity between the article listed as a source here and the text on the site. On one hand, the source states that the party was against this motion, however the article simply states that, in fact, this was one of the party's main interests. Which was it?
APenInSpace (talk) 12:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Appointing silly people to all the portfolios that matter"
Talk:Florida Lottery

message: Article merged: See old talk-page here
Somebody please add the logo? 216.179.123.105 00:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Mgrē@sŏn 16:17, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Louis C. Wagner Jr.

message: Gen. Wagner seems to be quite a soldier, however this article really should try to feature/explain for what action / battle(s) he earned the Distinguished Service Cross, Combat Infantry Badge, Silver Star, Bronze Star, and Purple Heart. Considering he graduated West Point too late for Korean War service, I assume he must've earned them in Viet Nam. Can someone please try to expand on this? It would really help the article. I'd be bold and do it myself (still might if I ever get time), but I have plenty of other articles to work on already. Sector001 (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medals & honors?
Talk:Kansas Lottery

message: How about the logo? 216.179.123.105 00:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 