lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Non-free promotional

message: I discovered that the following words going after “fair use” read “under Copyright law of the United States.” There is supposed to be a “the” after “under” and before “Copyright”, which would have it read as “under the Copyright law of the United States.” Adding the “the” would make it proper grammar. Metric Supporter 89 (talk) 20:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I discovered some improper grammar on the template
Talk:Edgar Meyer

message: I've fixed a couple of problems with the infobox.  First, and presumably noncontroversially, I shifted Deutsche Grammophon and the other labels from a "date" to the "label" category.  Second, and this one will probably (as seemingly always) spark debate, I removed the individuals' names from "associated acts."  To describe a classical soloist like Joshua Bell as an "associated act" is just plain silly; I don't know what convention rules the popular music world in that regard, but I think the individual non-classical musicians are deserving of similar treatment.  Therefore, I transferred them to a new sentence in the introductory section of the article proper.  I left in the box the one group cited as an "associated act," as it does seem to satisfy that description. Drhoehl (talk) 23:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Issues

message: This page has the following statement:
"Meyer has also composed a number of works that break the traditional mold of classical music, including two double bass concertos, a double concerto for bass and cello, and a violin concerto composed specifically for Hilary Hahn."
Well, how has he broken the traditional mold of classical music? There should be some detail or fact describing how he is breaking the mold.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.137.8.255 (talk) 03:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breaking What?
Talk:Primary source

message: The article focuses much on the term used in history, but very little on library science and medicine. Hope that Wikipedians familiar with these disciplines can use reliable sources to add information about it.--RekishiEJ (talk) 09:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term in library science and medicine 

message: When was the primary social and that's all I want to know 🙄 24.126.199.147 (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the primary source written that is all I want to know 🙄 

message: One packet of content can contain largely primary source material with a bit of secondary.  Another might contain largely secondary source material with a bit of primary.  Other combinations can also work as follows: 
I worked from the WP:NOR example given in the secondary source  related text:  (I summarised this as the book as including secondary source material with personal primary source material included). In more common practice  a topic might include photographs and various accounts related to that topic, (as potentially primary source material within secondary source material).  If the  made reference to, say, another person's war experiences, that account may itself have included that  on, for instance, personal perceived follies/successes in pervious wars, (secondary source material within primary source material).  Closer to home, Wikipedia calls itself  (as primary within tertiary with a whole encyclopaedia's worth of PST references placed into a phenomenally voluminous content on the way).
There's also a current discussion on this at Wikipedia talk:No original research#P/S/T sources; P/S/T sourcing; or P/S/T source materials, etc. for anyone interested.
GregKaye 14:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A primary source is the material within an enveloping content that may contain other than solely primary source material. 

message: I tried to add to the article about Primary Sources. For my addition, it is extremely important that I add an emoji. However, the automatic filter did not allow me to publish the addition of the emoji.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmrv1 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The redirect The Primary Source has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   talk 23:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The Primary Source]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Mark Clark

message: I have recently changed this disambig page so that it conforms to look like most disambig pages.  I have removed a large portion of the comments about Mark W. Clark on this page, because they really aren't needed here, and that person already has their own article.  I would like to get all of the entries listed here down to one or two sentences, and then put the rest of the info about these people, on their respective pages.  But since most of the people mentioned here don't have their own page just yet, I have decided to leave the long descriptions alone.  Should anyone in the future add a link here for a page created for one of these people, please whittle down the excessive info here.  Thanks -- Malo 23:16, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Changes
Talk:Real estate

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://nimconsulting.be/art-case/business-process-workflow-setup-uber-case-2/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The redirect Luxury home has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 06:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Luxury home]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Luxury Home has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 06:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Luxury Home]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Numbered highways in Ohio

message: IMO The Ohio Turnpike does not belong here.  List of Ohio State Highways to me says roads such as OH 32 or OH 8.  To me, the Ohio Turnpike is an Interstate and should go on a separate page.  If we're including the Ohio Turnpike, why not US routes that go through Ohio?
:I think the Interstates and U.S. Highways should be included here, but not listed as "Ohio Turnpike". --SPUI (talk) 04:10, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  This is a list for state highways.  I removed the US highways, but left the Ohio 'pike in a See Also section because of possible  reader confusion.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 22:19, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ohio Turnpike 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support: Reason stated above.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 05:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I wish to pattern the List of State Highways in Ohio on the state route box at List of Routes in Vermont#Current. People seem to like this design well (gauging interest at other state highway pages). What do you think? The full design list that I have created can be found at User:Seicer/sandbox1.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 16:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Vermont list looks really nice; it seems like a great idea for Ohio as well :-)  I had trouble with a few state highway articles I put up today, since none of them had pre-made sign images (obviously!) and I don't have the software to make .svg images.  On the other hand, I'm not likely to put up much on state highways, so I don't think my opinion is as important as others'.  Nyttend 23:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Route Page Design 

message: I moved the Route Classifications to their own seperate talk page. The reasoning was that the lists made the talk page very long and were not really a "discussion" per se. A big box was made at the top of the page so it can't be missed :)  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route Classifications
Talk:Jean Marchand

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 06:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This really perplexes me.  Both Marchand's decision not to run because, at least in part, of his weakness in French and the use in 1965 of the term the "three doves" are well documented.  To the best of my knowledge, there is no dispute over these facts.  You, however, have stated bluntly that they are "insulting misinformation," as if there is some sort of debate as to their accurace.  Now, however, you say that they are insulting "if" they are untrue.  To the best of your knowledge, is there a debate over these facts?  On what do you base your claim that they are NPOV?  If you don't know much about the subject, why wouldn't you first raise the issue on the discussion page, rather than alleging NPOV and changing the article.  In short, what am I missing here?  HistoryBA 00:26, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, now I'm even more perplexed.  You've reversed me again without responding to my comment above and without indicating why you refuse to accept Gerard Pelletier's memoirs as sufficient proof.  I ask you please to respect the spirit of good will that is supposed to govern Wikipedia and discuss things here before reverting.  HistoryBA 01:21, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Humboldt

message: Rich Farmbrough, 03:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In Our Time indeed has Humboldt program, which belongs not on the accompanying Dab page, but on surely on Alexander Humboldt. Since i can't edit and view the  ... oh, wait, i can! ....
Oh, me LIKE cookies!
OK, the template needs to go to the corresponding talk page, and .....?? OK, i think i get it, i'm gonna paste on the talk page, and it's no doubt going to notice i did what i was told and maybe ask if i'm sure it's the right place. Hey, wait, earning cookies is one thing, but getting them is another (which is pretty much the same as eating them)....Hmmmm, let's copy and paste to talk:alexander Humboldt, no talk:alexander von Humboldt
OK, looks like it probably works like intended, and it says i can "change [my] cookie settings", which must be how i get my bonus!
Actually, maybe not; my preview shows it making a change, but one made looking different from, and perhaps made redundant by, the  link to the IOT program in the Miscellaneous section; i didn't save the edit that would have added to the article the template i moved from talk:Humboldt. Will note this at talk:alexander von Humboldt#In Our Time.--Jerzy•t 12:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: In Our Time
Talk:Moscow mule

message: I have a Copper Cup with Moscow Mule name on both sides...BUT it has two mules kicking up their heels in between the "Moscow and Mule" name.  The bottom has AMERICAN METALCRAFT CHICAGO 41.  Can anyone tell me about this cup.  It doesn't indicate it is from the Cock and Bull.
:I wondered about that as well - I'd heard (albeit from a source that would be impossible to verify) that the Moscow Mule was invented by advertising execs in Chicago as part of a promotional campaign meant to push sales of a new brand of vodka. Your cup is the best piece of evidence to support this that I've heard of.Cknoepke (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copper cup

message: I just edited the page to replace the reference to garnish with a sprig of mint with directions to garnish with a wedge or slice of lime. Every Moscow Mule I've ever been served had a lime garnish. The sidebox synopsis of preparation indicates lime as the garnish. The video shows a lime being used as the garnish. Every one of the references at the bottom of the article also referred to the drink being garnished with lime. I think it is a pretty clear case of fixing an error. William McVey 3 December 2014.
I added the bit about Mistletoe Mule w/ Garnish of Rosemary & Cranberry. this IS a thing, unsourced or not, and if I am reverted AGAIN by some overzealous teenage male, I do intend to go to the mattresses. Unless you can show sources for *standardized, authoritative* versions of ALL THE OTHER variants here then do not mess with me or with Jax Cafe where I FIRST enjoyed this ingenious variation, because it is like a Christmas Tree in a glass! Skates61 (talk) 03:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garnish 

message: According to guidelines, "In popular culture" sections "should contain only properly sourced examples that are bona fide cultural references" (Wikipedia:"In popular culture" content).  I think all the listings are nothing more than trivia - merely examples of fictional characters that drank a Moscow mule. (And only one is properly sourced.)  Listed below for discussion.  Deli nk (talk) 12:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: Oldest alcoholic drink known to be had. (Moonshine University).
made with vodka, ginger beer and topped with hibiscus mead. Enjoyed by Viking people. 2600:6C44:39F0:9840:2065:D682:816B:7ADB (talk) 13:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mead mule 

message: Basic information to add to this article (which I can't believe isn't already mentioned here, and which is something anyone reading this article would expect to find here, especially as we claim our articles are encyclopedic): the origin/etymology of the name "mule" as it relates to this drink. That is, why exactly is it called "mule"?? Is it because the liquor is said to give this drink a "kick" like a mule? 76.190.213.189 (talk) 03:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reliable source in mind that would support that addition?   signed, Willondon (talk)  15:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Fidel Castro/Archive 2

message: Shouldn't the picture be Castro in his military fatigues?  He is almost never seen in a suit so that picture isn't a very good portrayal of him--65.25.250.220 06:07, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we have to see the triumphant Líder Maximo *chuckle* This is Trey 09:01, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You have been warned on User talk:This is Trey. 172 20:07, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: Someone takes herself way too fuckin' seriously. J. Parker Stone 22:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox picture 

message: Hey, viva la revolución and all that, but we could still be a little more critical of old Fidel without being lackeys of Uncle Sam, you know. Chamaeleon 02:43, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  We could be a bit more critical
Talk:Connoisseur

message: What does "a still vaguer man of taste" mean?
:The phrase seems to refer to a less specialised person than the traditional connoisseur, at least that was my understanding of it. J.Fries 00:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Why does this article deal exclusively with art? The term is used just as often (if not more so) in relation to food, drink or music.  -Adjusting 07:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fine Arts? 

message: How might one refer to a female connoisseur? A connoisseusse perhaps?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zen tom (talk • contribs) 14:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably just connoisseur still; it's a gender-neutral noun in English. You could borrow the French female version, but the complication there is that the English noun doesn't even match the modern French male version, so you'd be basically creating a neologism in English. But in any case, in French, the male form is connaisseur, and the female one connaisseuse. --Delirium (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feminine Forms 

message: People use the term connoisseur to refer to people who are knowledgable about other spheres, such as film or comics.  Should there be some reference to this more modern use of the term?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Euchrid (talk • contribs) 14:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  other spheres 

message: This article is classed as an academic discipline on a major contents page of the site. Is it really? Personally, I don't think it is. It isn't really helpful for visitors to be directed to here as if it were a proper academic subject. A useful article, important and informative, but not a discipline of its own accord by any means. Dr. Jim Dixon (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I know what you mean, but it is arguably a "sub-discipline", though certainly mainly learnt in the art trade and museums rather than academia as such. The output very often appears in scholarly journals though. Johnbod (talk) 01:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Of course it's a "proper academic subject." A person can't just walk in off the street and say, "Oh, yes, that's a genuine Artemisia!" Pascalulu88 (talk) 14:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to this article
Talk:Urinal deodorizer block

message: A urinal cake is the subject of the parody folk song "The Ballad of Eddie Praeger" by Paul and Storm. --FOo 23:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eroding, eroding, eroding away 

message: Is it? From what I read in the article, it seems not. J.P.Lon 00:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Urine is sterile, but bacteria can and do grow in it. --2001:470:B:4CA:1000:0:1:31 (talk) 03:36, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Disinfectant?

message: On the season 6 episode 15 of the TV serie "Frasier", Niles, Frasier's brother, was in process of divorce. His wife Marys was dragging it out and causing him to pay lots of extra lawyer fees and making accusations to give her advantage over the assets, then Niles hired a new lawyer (Donnie) who discovers some "dirt" on Marys -- her family got all her riches not from sales of timber but from sales of urinal cakes.  This gave them the leverage they needed to win the case, as Marys didn't want this to be known.
Being a single woman I had no idea what they were referring to. I turned to Wikipedia, sure enough, there was my answer!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pntippett (talk • contribs) 19:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: TV serie "Frasier"
Talk:25 Martin Place

message: an image would be nice. Kingturtle 03:44, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Shouldn't this article include the criticism for ruining the streetscape of Martin Place? I've heard that many architects hate this building because it's set so far back and interrupts the line created by the surrounding buildings. Anyone who has visited the building would be likely to notice this quite easily. (Huey45 (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 
Talk:Mohammad-Taqi Bahar

message: I don't see need for sections but I'll put them up anyway. Vincent Gray 03:59, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the following from the main text:
"Both Mohammad-Taqi Bahar and his cousin Haj Sheikh Ahmad Bahar along with most of their immediate relatives changed their surnames officially to Bahar during the period when the Bahar Title publications gained notoriety."
Reason: the statement is unclear (what "notoriety" is referred to, for instance?) and likely to cause undue confusion. After the matter has been clarified, and the statement appropriately modified and referenced, it may be introduced into the main text. --BF 00:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remark 
Talk:Rowing (disambiguation)

message: I've been working for a while on galley. During my work on that topic, I've looked at this dabpage a number of times, and by now I'm starting to believe it's not really that helpful to the casual reader. Modern sports rowing has clearly taken precedence over all other types of rowing, even to the extent that sub-topics are considered to be just as important as main topics.
As far as I can tell, watercraft rowing is an article about all kinds of rowing in general. It could encompass everything from 21st century Olympic rowing to Ancient galley rowing. The rest of the links are really nothing but highly specific types of rowing or sports (and one completely unrelated homograph). So why not make this the main article and move this dabpage to rowing (disambiguation)?
Peter Isotalo 17:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Main topic?