lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gandhi Jayanti

message: Wasn't Gandhi's favorite hymn Vaishnov Jan?  K ganju 15:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are there things that are traditionally said to one another on this day?  Upon meeting other people does one say happy Gahndi Jayanti for example?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.94.176.22 (talk) 07:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Holiday Sayings

message: Lal bahadur shastri jayanti  PRANAY79 (talk) 18:38, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide an independent reliable source for content you'd like to add (see WP:V and WP:RS for more information). GermanJoe (talk) 18:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose merging International Day of Non-Violence into Gandhi Jayanti. I think that the Gandhi Jayanti is celebrated to mark birthday of Mahatma Gandhi and this day also celebrated with this reason and similarity is they are celebrated to mark birthday of Gandhi.UserABCXYZ (talk) 06:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Support Either we stop discussing International Day of Non-Violence or we combine with that page. It's not clear what this page is about—is it about "International Day of Non-Violence" too? If not, we should stop discussing it so much here. DenverCoder9 (talk) 00:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: a moral talk about Gandhiji Mahatma Gandhi 2402:3A80:13A2:B07:25A5:1917:6743:3BAF (talk) 14:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahatma Gandhi ji
Talk:Haboob

message: The small boat image used in the North Africa section seems unrelated to the contents of the article apart from the fact that it was taken in North Africa. Unless the image is taken during a haboob (in which case, its description should be updated), does this image really contribute or relate to the article? If not, it should probably be removed. Also, an improvement I see could be adding more related images, similar to how other weather articles (such as Tornado, Winter storm, and Dust devil) have multiple related images of their conditions.
These are just some potential ideas I had. TealWingGreen (talk) 04:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small boat image and potential improvements
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Andres Useche

message: I am the person who nominated the article and I was not registered in english wikipedia because I'm not enough good in english lenguage as you can see, but I find this article here cause I work in spanish articles about cinema specially colombian cinema and I've never heared about him before or his short movie and the "Premios Cesares" actually exist in Colombia but is a small local ceremony for visual arts and comunication. This article looks like was made by the author and have exagerating things, If you check previus revisions there are one where said that the cesares are the equivalent to Academy Awards in South America that is totally false, in Colombia there are two big cinema Festivals Cartagena International film festival and Bogota International film festival. I don't have anything against this person but I think is just promoting himself. Chien-A 04:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ultimaton

message: Regardless of whether the character was named after the ultimaton from the Urantia book, a description of the particle doesn't belong in the article about the comic book character, any more than a description of Gulo gulo belongs in the article about the comic book character Wolverine. That's why there are disambiguation pages, to discriminate between the large weasel and the fictional character named after the weasel, or between the subatomic particle and a fictional character that shares a name with it.--71.174.78.146 01:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in this article
Talk:Empire and Communications

message: Before anyone jumps on me, the author Harold Innis died in 1952, so it's public domain in Canada and can be quoted freely. Plus to summarize would likely lose much of the meaning.
:I am currently rewriting this page to meet Wikipedia standards.Bwark (talk) 21:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After a few months' delay, I am returning to work on this summary of a very difficult book. Bwark (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Xethanol

message: Readers should be aware that this page is being used to manipulate the value of the stock.  XNL has been the target of massive short-sales in recent months. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jeffries (talk • contribs) 04:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have a citation for this claim, add it to the article. Otherwise, please describe in greater detail how this article is manipulative of the stock price, and add the  tag to the article itself. And please sign your posts by writing ~~~~. Cheers, Vectro 05:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stock value manipulation 
Talk:Doo Dah Parade

message: ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved While trying to retrieve the URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doo-Dah_Parade The following error was encountered: Unable to forward this request at this time. This request could not be forwarded to the origin server or to any parent caches. The most likely cause for this error is that: The cache administrator does not allow this cache to make direct connections to origin servers, and 
All configured parent caches are currently unreachable. Your cache administrator is nobody.--hopiakuta 05:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is likely congestion at your ISP. No need to post such a message here, with screamer caps to boot. UncleFester 21:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Error the requested URL could not be retrieved"

message: Someone cluttered up the article with links within proper nouns, which makes no sense. As well, there was a whole bunch of pointless internal links. While the parade itself might be silly, the coverage at Wikipedia should not be. If you want to do that, go to Uncyclopedia. UncleFester 21:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Somebody went nuts with Wikilinks
Portal talk:History/Intro

message: Change civilisation to civilization
75.51.72.71 (talk) 19:27, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: - per WP:ENGVAR; "civilisation" is the correct UK spelling. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:09, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 75.51.72.71, 30 October 2010 

message: #Updated intro text with current text from WP:LEAD from main article, History.
#Added randomized intro image selection, for increased dynamism for the main portal page, with all free use images taken from main article, History.
#Listed (no-transcluded) link to this intro image subpage on the intro page, at Portal:History/Intro/Image.
#Kept the prior 2 paragraph format.
#Added categorization of the intro subpage to :Category:History portal. 
Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformatted the intro subpage  

message: Add:
“History can provide us with an understanding of the events in the past so we can learn from them and incorporate them to similar human situations today, even if the learning and incorporating is unconsciously done.  Link text Retrieved from American Historical Association],  additional text.
after: This includes discussing the study of the discipline as an end in itself and as a way of providing "perspective" on the problems of the present
Blueheron1997 (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template.  B E C K Y  S A Y L E S  05:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2016 

message: may i make a few changes Ohyeahboy22 (talk) 23:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Spintendo      00:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2018 

message: my poppop was in the world war 1 and 2 and we won thanks to all the veterans 50.226.165.186 (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out the portals for World War I and World War 2. --Meanderingbartender (talk) 15:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2018
Talk:Plutonium (cave)

message: == Greek spelling ==
The Greek spelling matters: Πλουτωνειον = "place of Pluto"; Πλουτωνιον = "little Pluto", compare the later Greek grammarian `Ηφαιστιον Hephaistion = "little Hephaestus"; but the two may be confused in later (post-classical) times after ει started to be pronounced the same as ι. Anthony Appleyard 05:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: The Greek spelling matters: Πλουτωνειον = "place of Pluto"; Πλουτωνιον = "little Pluto", compare the later Greek grammarian `Ηφαιστιον Hephaistion = "little Hephaestus"; but the two may be confused in later (post-classical) times after ει started to be pronounced the same as ι. Anthony Appleyard 05:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek spelling
Talk:Citrate

message: Could someone with a good knowledge of chemistry explain how citrates help prevent the formation of kidney stones? I imagine it would be because the large citrate ion does not form crystals when it bonds weakly to calcium etc, though my knowledge here is rather limited and I have no texts to refer to. This information would be very useful for people suffering from kidney stones, in terms of understanding how drinking say orange juice helps stop the formation of the stones (crystals). Richard001 06:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kidney stones

message: While this page is not a stub I feel it is not up to the usual wiki standard considering the central role of citrate in metabolism.  It has affects on lipogenesis and is an allosteric affecter of many different enzymes and most likely loads of other things I'm not yet familiar with.--Drewlew 21:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work 

message: In addition to the above, some other topics needed:  Dietary sources of citrate?  Pharmaceutical sources?  Therapies using citrate (eg for uric acid nephrolithiasis;  see )?  --Una Smith (talk) 04:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree that this article needs much expanding, also please will someone add something about citrates anticoagulant properties and how citrate is added to blood taken for transfusion. The citrate binds the calcium ions (as citrate is a chelating agent) which prevents the blood from coagulating, thanks, 129.11.61.149 (talk) 22:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand 

message: I have transferred all relevant material thar was not already contained in citric acid to that article. Petergans (talk) 10:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Turán's theorem

message: It has been suggested that Turán graph be merged into Turán's theorem. I am opposed, because I believe Turán graphs have relevance in graph theory beyond Turán's theorem, as I hope I have made clear with my recent update to Turán graph. In addition, Turán graph is a natural member of :Category:Graphs while Turán's theorem does not fit there, so after a merger someone looking through that category for interesting example graphs to try for some other problem would not find the Turán graphs. —David Eppstein 06:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - we can have the extremal object on a different page from the theorem about extremals. Charles Matthews 09:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  .. me too Vonkje 21:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion. 

message: I don't think the formula is equivalent to the formulation at the end. It is not incorrect, just that in some cases, it can give more edges than what's in the Turan graph. For example, T(13, 9) has only 74 edges, but the formula gives 75.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.234.241.86 (talk) 00:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the comment above. "The same formula gives the number of edges in the Turán graph T(n,r)" is simply incorrect, as has been noted, for example, on MSE. Vince Vatter (talk) 11:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with formula under "Formal Statement" section 
Talk:Nikon D50

message: Do we really need an example image gallery? See also Talk:Canon EOS 350D and Canon EOS 350D for an example of an bloated article. As I've said earlier, camera articles should deal with the tool, not the produce of them. You would not list individual highways that one may drive on with car brand foo, nor list books & publications one may read wearing foo's reading glasses. Scoo 06:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Example image gallery

message: The D50 is no longer oin Nikon's product list. That should probably be addressed in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 140.175.214.33 (talk) 14:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remember it right, the D50 was not discontinued until the introduction of the D40x. The D50 sold side by side witht eh D40 until that point. So, was the D50 really replaced by the D40 as the article says or by the D40x or not at all?--NikOly (talk) 22:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was still sold side by side with the D40 because stores had stocks, but Nikon wasn't making any new ones, as it had moved on to the D40. So it's indeed a replacement. --Nattfodd (talk) 06:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Works for me. It is definitly a minor point. It is just odd how Nikon didn't remove the D50 from their product list (on their web site) when the D40 was announced but waited until the D40x was announced and then the D50 was removed that same day. When the D60 was announced I think the D40x disappeared off the product list immediately.  --NikOly (talk) 03:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I added the word "discontinued" to the opening sentence, which is the same way it is treated in the Nikon D100 article.  --rogerd (talk) 04:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discontinued

message: The box on the right says it has 13.7 megapixels, but the text says 6.1.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 06:52, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  megapixels? 

message: The first paragraph says "The D50 was succeeded by the Nikon D40 in November 2006."  I don't know much about the D50, but the D40 "successor" lacks the internal focus motor.  On the other hand, the D50 did end when the D40 was introduced.  So if the D40 was a true successor is not clear to me.  The Nikon DSLR timeline lists the D50 as upper entry level and the D40 as lower entry level.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 06:50, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  D50, D70, and D40
Talk:1181 Lilith

message: I have removed a whole lot of templates from the page to avoid clutter, and I'm putting the requested move onto the talk page where it belongs. Note however that a source is needed before anybody will perform the move. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 06:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was moved. —Mets501 (talk) 14:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Templates
Talk:Andrew Carlssin

message: I added the basics for this article, but could use some major help finalizing it.  Please help with edits. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cteckerman (talk • contribs).
:This might have notability problems because it originates from Weekly World News. Anomo 01:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue is whether it's a notable hoax. Wikipedia has a category for hoaxes and a List of hoaxes. For now, I've put it in both. I personally believe it's a notable enough hoax to be included given some of the other inclusions and that quite a few people I know heard about it at the time (subjective I know but so is the whole concept of notability). Yay unto the Chicken 01:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have proposed that this article be deleted, since it is about a minor, uninteresting hoax from years ago and has drawn virtually no edits in many years. Actually, it's not even a hoax, it's just one Weekly World News article. We don't need to write articles about WWN articles. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The hoax is apparently described in the book Pedestrian Safety Expert Gets Hit by Bus (according to the article). It is also described at snopes.com and in The Edinburgh Evening News ("Anyone Can Be Fooler of the World," 4 April 2003). This seems to meet the general notability guidelines without appeal to the primary sources in Weekly World News or Yahoo. Google News archives also show 21 news sources, though not all are written in English. Cnilep (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Ministry (government department)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 15:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ministry (government department) →  – Why ...Department is a synonym in the article so the name should the name should not be described by, what is equivalent to that word ASFLOCK (talk) 05:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Support move to Department (government)  --- Tbf69 P • T 15:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Strong Oppose & snow/speedy close - You could still call a collective Ministry a governmental body. The title is not a definition, so it is not against any sort of rules to have a synonym in a title. Estar8806 (talk) 03:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 March 2023 

message: Which ministry is most common? Kaiyr (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common
Talk:The Star Gold Coast

message: Jupiters has rebranded and is no longer referred to as Conrad Jupiters. The new brand is Jupiters Hotel and Casino. How can i change this title? (wiki user - jupitersgc, 09.01.12, 1205 AEST)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jupitersgc (talk • contribs) 02:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the page to reflect the new name.  Moving pages is done via the small black down arrow near the edit and view history links at the top of an article.  Also if needing help use the search box by typing "wp:" and then a keyword for what you need help on.  This limits the search to just Wikipedia project pages which are full of help, guidelines, policy and essays. - Shiftchange (talk) 02:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the article from Conrad Jupiters to Jupiters Hotel and Casino
Talk:Chinese egret

message: For this tiny article I just took the stub rating that was on the main page. Cynops 13:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Poor man's tropheus

message: Hi - re: the use of common name "poor man's Tropheus" over "Neetroplus". I think this is an ambiguous common name and it's certainly not universal. In Australia, many cichlid hobbyists would have never heard of it and refer to the fish as Neets. I propose that the "common name" policy should only apply where the common name is used unambigously and near universally in english speaking countries eg: convict cichlid, oscar, jack dempsey. In cases such as this the genus name, in my opinion, would be better. I would like to propose we therefore move this page to Neetroplus and redirect the common name to the genus name. Thoughts? MidgleyDJ 07:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Common Name

message: Is the reclassification to Hypsophrys universally recognized, or is just a proposal in one paper?  The one paper I saw referencing the proposed reclassfication also suggest several other new names - such as for convict cichlids - that are not reflected in Wikipedia either.Rlendog (talk) 17:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific Name

message: Lake Managua is not described as a rift lake in its article, and neither is Lake Nicaragua. (The two other lakes mentioned are red links.) Many East African cichlids live in rift lakes (e.g. Lake Malawi), but I haven't heard CA lakes described as such before. - Soulkeeper (talk) 11:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the reference to these being "rift" lakes. Rlendog (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rift lakes?
Talk:A Son of His Father

message: A search for Son of His Father at the UCLA Film and Television Archive website returns only https://cinema.library.ucla.edu/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=163512 which is actually for the 1917 silent film The Son of His Father, and not A Son of His Father, which is this film. The description in that UCLA listing supports this, although that listing does the article in the title wrong (A instead of The).
Because of this, though, it seems that this film should be marked as lost again, and its reference to being preserved at UCLA removed.
WikkanWitch (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This film is still lost
Talk:The Blind Goddess (1926 film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. The disambiguation page will be moved to the base title. (closed by non-admin page mover)  GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Blind Goddess →  – No indication that this lost silent film has greater historical significance than the combined notability of The Blind Goddess (play) as well as The Blind Goddess (1948 film) based upon the play. The Blind Goddess should be a disambiguation page listing all three entries. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 September 2022
Talk:Mantrap (1926 film)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Kateshortforbob talk 19:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Why does the Spanish title of the film even matter? It wasn't exactly a Spanish film. I think I might remove it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.200.134.82 (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mantrap (aka Flor de Capricho in Spain)" - Why does the Spanish title of the film matter?