lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Drop the Dead Donkey

message: Made a few adjustments, a little bit of rewording, fleshed out some of the character descriptions just a smidgen, and altered 'Royston' to 'Roysten'.  - 207.195.254.155 18:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adjustments

message: I've edited this list a bit -removed Not the Nine Oclock news and clarified the see-also-ness of a few entries ie removed simillar premise from those that frankly don't or only barely - but I"m not really sure it's useful here -the list of episodes is linked in the box and the rest seem to be a grab bag of some sitcoms that happen to be set in news rooms and some dramas and some satirical shows. i added ballot monkeys and  power monkeys as they are  much more related I  feel- probably all that actually is fitting- but is it worth having a section for 2 links?Kitten88.r (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  see also
Talk:Allomerus decemarticulatus

message: So I just made some improvements to the page, with more material and more sources.
Also, in response to the earlier comment, the ants' relationship with the fungus may be more similar to the human relationship with trees and cows you talked about, but the plant actually shows many modified physical characteristics that seem to be specialized to support ant colonies.  So the ants are not just harvesting the fungus and plant hairs to use as a trap, but the plant species has coevolved with the ant species to allow the ants to make the best traps, because this not only maximizes the predatory ability of the ant, it also maximizes protection from herbivores for the plant.  In the human relationship, we are only really using pre-existing materials (wood and leather). Riceowl2014 (talk) 20:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements and Response to Untitled
Talk:Deutsche Bank

message: No Joke. Seriously, according to solid sources, Deutsche Bank is colloquially also called Douche Bank. Here are the sources:
Ceasar, E. (2016). Deutsche Bank's 10-Billion Scandal. The New Yorker. Paragraph 7, line 7. URL: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/08/29/deutsche-banks-10-billion-scandal
Zarroli, J. (2020). 'Dark Towers' Chases Scandal-Ridden Deutsche Bank's Mysterious Ties To Donald Trump. NPR - National Public Radio. Paragraph 7, line 3. URL: https://www.npr.org/2020/02/18/806984703/dark-towers-is-a-cautionary-tale-of-pursuing-profits-at-any-cost
Enrich, D. (2020). Dark Towers: Deutsche Bank, Donald Trump, and an Epic Trail of Destruction. Barnes & Nobles. Chapter 4, paragraph 1, line 3. URL: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/readouts/dark-towers-deutsche-bank-donald-trump-and-an-epic-trail-of-destruction/
Williams-Grut, O. (2016). Hedge Funds Are Dumping Deutsche Bank and Shares Are Tanking. Business Insider. Paragraph 1. URL: https://www.businessinsider.com/10-hedge-funds-pull-business-from-deustche-bank-shares-dive-september-30-2016-9?r=US&IR=T
Knowing the pecularities of Wikipedia, I know how this may have to potential to inflate and escalate. This is why I would like to open it up for discussion to decide after 2 weeks or so whether or not to add it to the article.--2A01:8B81:4805:B000:D520:E083:B91F:1659 (talk) 07:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Douche Bank 

message: Hello - I can't see any mention of this in the article, apologies if it's there somewhere. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/24/investing/deutsche-citi-antitrust-uk-bonds/index.html Worth adding I think.
Thelisteninghand (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Bonds - DB admit anti-competitive behaviour 24 May 2023
Talk:1981 in film

message: *Big Brother (film) (Abang), (Le Grand Frère...(1982))
this looks strange in a 1981 list. Any takers? Murgh 23:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It did. Thanks for removing it. If anyone still thinks it's notable, it can be placed in the correct year at least. Hoverfish 09:15, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: error?

message: Without researching I can assume that this has been debated before, but with the news events listed for significant film-related goings-on that occured that year it might logically follow that the Oscars listed would be those awarded that year (ie, in '81 the Awards are actually for films released in '80).
Perhaps a note should be added to all "(year) in film" articles that the Academy Awards listed are for that year's films, but were awarded on BLANK and fill in the date.   RoyBatty42 19:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Academy Awards

message: I have noticed that the films in the gross rank table have references to Box Office Mojo, is this really needed as under the table it says that the gross information is courtesy of Box Office Mojo. Also, some references lead to the Box Office Mojo information to Superman II.
I also don't know what my user name is so I don't think I should put that after this message.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.102.157.194 (talk) 02:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not helped by Box Office Mojo (& WP) using lifetime grosses on the year pages, as if the films earned their lifetime gross that year, which is very misleading...  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 21:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: References for the films?

message: The page lists Demi Moore's debut as "Choices", but the link goes to a 1986 TVM, which is clearly wrong...& contradicted by what's on her page....  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 21:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picky, picky
Talk:List of monarchs of East Anglia

message: According to this page, Raedwald lived and reigned until 617.  But there seems to be some discrepancy,  as according to Raedwald of East Anglia and Bretwalda, Raedwald lived and reigned until 627.   Is there  some question in the historical record, or is there a typo here?  --Deville (Talk) 15:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raedwald 

message: The list containts two Aethelreds with different dates for each, but both end up pointing to the same destination article.  I assume these are two different kings?
:the list has two Aethelstan, but both end up pointing to the same destination article. I assume these are two different kings?Håbet 17:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Aethelreds? 

message: There's only one Guthrum on the list of East Anglian rulers in the Blackwell Encyclopedia of Anglo-Saxon England. The list ends with Eohric. There's only one Guthrum in the index to Swanton's Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. The Prosopography of Anglo-Saxon England had another Guthrum, this one, but his floruit is under Æthelstan. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 22:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Several references note Guthrum II, such as Ashley (Mammoth Book of British Kings & Queens, p466-467), Lappenburg (A History of England Under the Anglo-Saxon Kings p87) and Walker (Mercia and the making of England, p110), and he is also noted in Kessler's History Files, Nash Ford's EBK site and Britannia.com. I have yet to see any primary source as yet, and have just noted that there is now a Guthrum II page. I extrapolated the contemporary title, please feel free to delete if it is not appropriate - after all, it is a wiki site for experts and amateurs alike. Regards Robinboulby (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a #REDIRECT to List of monarchs of East Anglia#Note: Guthrum II, and a heading on bottom is better then "delete", because deleted pages by sources will been re-created again and again.Haabet 21:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guthrum II? 

message: -easily amended to included any changes to regnal dates--Amitchell125 (talk) 21:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart added 

message: The article now contains sources and references, etc. I cannot find the source for the contemporary names - can anyone help? --Hel-hama (talk) 16:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I can't help, but I think you've done a really good job so far.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major revision
Talk:The Failure of the New Economics

message: This article is in no way NPOV. The purpose of Wikipedia is neither to discredit nor promote Keynesian economics. Someone with a decent knowledge of the book needs to amend this article (or i will try). Isthatyou
:I have tagged it as POV.  The recent additions by the anonymous editor have made the POV much worse. LK (talk) 14:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Minor formatting changes by a banned editor that are improvements shouldn't be mindlessly reverted.  Please review the edits and if there is any substantive edit, then it is (of course) necessary and desirable to revert.  But if they are merely corrections of typos or issues of presentation that improve the page they should be left and the sockpuppet banned.  Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.105.44.218 (talk) 06:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting
Talk:Fantastic Four (movie)

message: The 2005 Fantastic Four movie is now at Fantastic Four (2005 movie) is comply with Wikipedia naming conventions for movies.  The 1994 movie is at Fantastic Four (1994 movie) for the same reason.  Since this article cannot in good faith redirect to one but not the other, I've made it a disambiguation page.  Once all the wikilinks are corrected, it could presumably be deleted, but it is likely to be created again. -Acjelen 02:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Move
Talk:1993 Chrétien attack ad

message: *Is there any place where one could see the ad in question? 70.115.245.11
::You can see the first part of it here.Habsfannova 20:51, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier discussion

message: The article has no references or sources, so I have tagged it as such.  There is some pretty POV commentary in the article, that I individually tagged, that really needs to be sourced.  Skeezix1000 12:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found some references and added them to the article, and removed the tag accordingly.  However, I left some of the smaller tags for things still uncited. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 05:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References and sources

message: It looks like someone attempted to put a picture in the template, but didn't actually insert it? Look at the box to the top-right?--Son of More 05:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Missing?
Talk:The Fantastic Four (1994 film)

message: This article is here now to comply with Wikipedia naming conventions for movies. -Acjelen 02:35, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Move

message: I noticed some vandalism as best I could, although I'm not sure how to report the perpetrator. I also cited one or the paragraphs that apparently needed a source. --71.109.37.168 23:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism Removed 

message: Corman confirmed that the film was made solely to secure the copyright and it was not intended for release.  The confirmation is cited in the "Controversy" section - please do not remove this sentence again without a source conflicting Corman's statement. --Chancemichaels 19:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never intended for release 

message: Exactly WHAT studio made the film? I think it was based in Germany, but there doesn't seem to be any information on it. 199.126.186.147 16:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stu-Stu-Studio?
Talk:Lila Acheson Wallace

message: Redirect Reader's Digest making sure Mrs Wallace's maiden name and high school are already there. --Wetman 02:38, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Diff3

message: This entry is derived from content in the GNU Diffutils manual version 2.8.1, which is copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1998, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
The GNU Diffutils manual is released under the GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.1.
----
I removed the speedy delete notice because it wasn't an advertisement and because I think we should have any article about this. Eric119 03:03, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: diff3 is used by MediaWiki (then here on Wikipedia) to show differences, is it?
QUESTION (and sugestion to put answer at article page): HOW diff3 output of 2 texts comparations can generate a visual comaration (word by word, or char by char), like history here on Wikipedia do?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.92.94.38 (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual products 

message: Hello! 2601:140:C180:0:8C1D:26AB:E02F:9AF7 (talk) 05:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  3a
Category talk:Artist stubs

message: I was going to add back the TOC template that was added by User:Tabletop on April Fool's Day, but thought better of it.  People-stub categories do not allow alphabetization by surname; therefore, the alphabetized list is by given name, and the TOC doesn't help as much in finding someone in a stub category as it does in a "normal" category. If you feel strongly about having it in, though, please add it back. Courtland 03:11, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
Question:
I added material to Adrian Piper and I deleted the "stub" designation. But how does the article get removed from the list? I also looked at Barbara Kruger. Lots there. I took off the Stub designation from her page, but don't know if that gets her off this list.--Sue Maberry 04:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: They don't have a sub-category eg Master I.A.M. of Zwolle is in neither the painters nor the illustrators. Fallen between the cracks?
Johnbod 02:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the printmakers? 

message: Aren't there stubs for them?
--Tyranny Sue (talk) 07:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about performers? and comedians?
Talk:Second Epistle to the Thessalonians

message: Could someone please summarise what is actually in this epistle? BrainyBabe (talk) 19:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content? 

message: "Admitting that there are stylistic problems between Second Thessalonians and First Thessalonians, he argues that part of the problem is due to the composite nature of First Thessalonians (Murphy-O'Connor is only one of many scholars who argue that the current text of Second Thessalonians is the product of merging two or more authentic letters of Paul.)" Which letter is the composite? The two sentences quoted seem to be in contradiction. The first sentence stating that it is 1Th that is a composite, the second that it is 2Th. Could someone check the sources and correct this? --Khajidha (talk) 18:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composite epistle 

message: What about the controversy of 2 Thessalonians 2:11, which makes God out to be a liar and deceiver, who makes people believe a working of error (which could in turn be the entire Bible itself)? Torquemama007 (talk) 18:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Thessalonians 2:11 
Talk:Benson & Hedges

message: I believe Benson & Hedges sponsored snooker too. Before the new regulations of course. I think they even sponsored the World Championship. That is something which should be mentioned I think. 
129.125.103.83 12:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: what is benson & hedges 103.226.31.156 (talk) 12:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Snooker=

message: Quote: "From 1878 until 1999, a Royal Warrant was issued to Gallaher on behalf of the product" ... is this correct?  According to this article, Gallaher Group didn't acquite B&H until 1958.  Me thinks that, perhaps, the first date should be 1978, not 1878.  These dates should be checked and validated with references, if possible.  
Also, I suspect that this warrant is only indicated on packs for sale in the UK market ... or was this on packs for export too?
It was on export packets too. The whole point of the royal warrant is a status symbol to the rest world that it is a quality product.Schnizzle 11:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Royal Warrant

message: Isn't it a bit pointless having the price here? The price of cigarettes isn't constant for every newsagent and tobacconist, it varies from place to place. Also, the price goes up every few months anyway. Haddock420 04:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Price

message: The flavour is somewhat of a marshmellowy taste mixed with chocolate, particularly in the menthol version. I think it would be interesting to add a "flavour/taste" section to the ciggartte articles.--Dragnilar 18:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taste

message: I deleted the following line as I believe it was not well written, not in the correct place and most importantly, not notable enough for inclusion in the article.
"and also the favoured cigarette of Ripley Bogle, from Robert McLiam Wilson's novel of the same name. (1998, Andre Deutsch)"
There is no wikipedia article on the book itself and the article on the author is a stub, just a few lines in length. Kingturkey 03:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ripley Bogle
Talk:Life Day

message: I think this article should be merged with The Star Wars Holiday Special
:It has enough details involved to be its own article, IMHO. The Wookieepedian 04:27, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO what's important with things like this isn't how much detail it has:  The question is, before we merge an article with something (in this case, the holiday special), we should ask, is this a concept outside the merge target?  In this case Life Day appears to be a concept outside the holiday special, given the video game and the children's book, so I think the article could stand.  CanadianCaesar 23:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. That was my point; Life Day is involved in enough material that it deserves an article of its own. The Wookieepedian 01:49, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

text: The template is here, but there is no listing under Articles for deletion. I'm removing it. 130.101.20.155 19:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Life Day with the Holiday Special
Talk:Gordon Springs (Georgia)

message: As a Georgian, I might be able to give some background, but I also have a big, big question.  
#In Georgia, incorporation was limited by the legislature, so no new towns or cities could be created without a special act.  Thus, there are incorporated towns that have, effectively, ceased to have any population, and there are booming "cities" that are unincorporated (most notably Sandy Springs, Georgia which just won a fight that has been going on for more than 30 years to get incorporated, as it is a place in Atlanta with an enormous population and wealth and remote from the county services that had previously been its only sources of fire and police protection).
#Question:  What exactly is the historical significance of Gordon Springs?  There were no Civil War battles there that I know of.  It was not a site for the incursions against the Cherokee, that I can tell.  It was not associated with the Dahlonega Gold Rush.  If its historical significance is that it was a luxury location associated with Gordon himself, then that leaves precious little for a separate article.
#It seems to me that the question is not "should Gordon Springs be mentioned somewhere," but "should a geo-article exist on a non-town, non-city that is also unpopulated because once it was associated with a particular historical figure?"  I.e. can this information (where it is and what the springs are) be put into an article on Gordon?  Does the information even make sense as a stand-alone -- is its reason for inclusion even comprehensible?  
To me, it seems, especially since the current article has no mention of historical role, that there is no justification for a separate, geography article on the place.  (And, incidentally, I'm one of the generally radical inclusionists when it comes to towns.)  Geogre 03:50, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical value?
Talk:Oak Beach Inn

message: Remember the old WDRE commercial?
Come gather 'round now, everyone
Got a tale about Bob Matherson
See, Bob's the owner of the OBI
(And truth be told, one hell of a guy)
A businessman like you and me
Conducting business in the Land of the Free
But folks out there, in high places
Hassled Bob about parking spaces
Bugged him about nonexistent things
Hurtin' the fish (?), balloons on strings
(something something)
Get out, get out of New York State
Get out now, before it's too late
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Schiraldi (talk • contribs) 03:46, 9 June 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember that before Bob Matherson gave up on the place, his commercials mistakenly referred to the OBI being off the "Jones Beach Causeway,"  when they meant Ocean Parkway. "Jones Beach Causeway" was actually the name chosen for Wantagh State Parkway south of the formerly proposed interchange with Seaford-Oyster Bay Expressway. ----DanTD (talk) 22:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial?

message: Another article on Wikipedia on Long Island says that this place is "notorious" but I don't really see much in this profile that backs up this assertion. Is this article leaving anything out? Newjerseyliz (talk) 16:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oak Beach Inn 

message: this should be added - Bob Matherson's hearse with his quote on top. "MOVE OUT OF NEW YORK STATE BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE"
https://www.flickr.com/photos/198939759@N05/53123919220/in/dateposted-public/ Jb1929 (talk) 20:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Hearse & Quote
Talk:List of unified school districts in Kansas

message: Are there any school districts in Kansas which are not "unified"? If so, there should be a list which includes them; almost all the other states now have comprehensive lists. Neelix (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The process of school district "unification" was statewide, I think back in either the 1960's or 1970's.  All public school districts were affected.  There really aren't any "private school districts" although there are private schools.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-unified school districts