lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pär Lindh

message: Can anyone tell me why the photo of the band got deleted?
Odne A. Oksavik 21:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture deleted?

message: This article is far from perfect, I know it...
I'm quite new to Wiki, and want to contribute.
I tried to start this article two days ago, but it seems too be deleted, for some reason.
If you want to help me improve this article, I would be delighted!
If there is something wrong, something that should be done different, please tell!
Odne A. Oksavik 20:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Feel free to help!
Talk:Aposematism

message: In the quote here there are strange notations, e.g. an "at" crossed out and the word "seizure" underlined. The frequency of them means this looks deliberate rather than a mistake. Is this a verbatim transcript of a letter meaning it needs a sic? Or do these marks require deletion? Gulielmus Rosseus (talk) 02:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The text of the letter shown by The Natural History Museum, footnoted as our source, shows the underlined words and the struck out word "at". That source includes this information: "This transcript is based on that produced by The Darwin Correspondence Project". The Darwin Project web page shows the words as italicized, rather than underlined, and does not show the struck out word "at" at all. (https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-5416.xml). I could not find an actual image of the letter. Almost certainly, the letter was handwritten, so italicizing would be unlikely or impossible, but underlining would be quite possible. It's an open question whether the word "at" actually appears in the letter and may have been crossed out by the writer. So, we're kind of back where we started: underline seems more plausible than italicizing in the original, and without more documentation, or an image of the correspondence, we can't be sure if "at" appears as crossed out, or perhaps does not appear at all. But the NHM source shows what we might consider more plausible in both matters: underlining and cross-out by the letter writer. DonFB (talk) 05:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of the Theory: Wallace, 1867
Talk:Bois Forte Indian Reservation

message: # Reservation flag
# Map of each of the three major Reservations
# History of each of the three Reservations
# Start and separate out the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa article about the people from this article about the land
# Cultural and business offerings of each of the three Reservations
# Contemporary issues facing the Reservation
CJLippert 17:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do to improve
Talk:West Central German

message: Disagree OK, there is a proliferation of pages about varieties of German and Germanic dialects, and they are mostly stubs or they overlap with each other a little too much, but I think the underlying structure is justifiable, and the interlinking allows pretty easy navigation. Anyway there's no reason to single out West Central German among all the others, you'd have to overhaul the entire web of articles, starting from German dialects and West Germanic languages etc. CapnPrep 21:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: The yellow area on the map, :File:Westmitteldeutsches Mundartgebiet.PNG, which is purportedly the area for the West Central German family of dialects, is identical to the area for Central Franconian dialects on its map, :file:Die Frankiese taalgebied.png.  If these concepts are identical, then there's some cleaning up to do. If they aren't, one of the maps needs to be fixed. ~ MD Otley (talk) 01:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad map
Talk:White Earth Indian Reservation

message: A map of the reservation in relation to the surrounding counties would be useful.Parkwells (talk) 15:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: "Predominantly Indian settlements include Elbow Lake; Naytahwaush which is the largest Indian community on the Reservation; Pine Point; Rice Lake; Twin Lakes; and White Earth which is the second largest Indian settlement on the Reservation."
According to the article about Twin Lakes, Minnesota the town, there are only 155 people there and only 0.60% are Native American. It highlights a spot in Southern MN on the map. However, There are two lakes (not a town) called the twin lakes (North Twin and South Twin, respectively) that are in/near Naytahwaush. Is that what this is talking about?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.121.249.93 (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Twin Lakes?

message: How can the reservation still be poor after the land settlement act?66.37.237.67 (talk) 20:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land recovery Act 

message: I added a map and made the White Earth Nation flag the primary images for the page. Having a black & white/historical photo as the primary image further contributes to the modern bias that native people exist only in the past and that they only dress in ceremonial clothes. Antlersantlers (talk) 18:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary images
Talk:Coat of arms of the Russian Empire

message: Why the Russian coat's are called emblems? This text is absolutely wrong : Quite often the Russian state emblems are incorrectly called "coats of arms". . These symbols are actually coats of arms. They have all the parts of the coat and do not have a similarity with the communist or other state emblems. --Scroch (talk) 13:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Emblem?

message: moved to Coat of arms of the Russian Empire--RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 20:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: National emblems of the Russian Empire → Coat of arms of Russian Empire — Clearly it bares all the characters of coat of arms. The symbols are not emblem.—Scroch (talk) 21:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Shouldn't it be Coats of arms of Russian Empire?  —  AjaxSmack  04:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: This article may be better merged in to Coat of arms of Russia.  Likewise, the Coat of arms of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic should be merged into Coat of arms of Russia as well.  The coat of arms articles are mostly short to begin with, and it would be simpler for a reader to find all of these small in one place.  A brief entry paragraph or two, followed by sections on tsarist, imperial, socialist and modern emblems or arms.  Also, this will better show the evolution of the symbols by seeing a complete history, rather than in segmented articles. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 03:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: On these two pages, published a letter from the Chief Heraldry Master of Russia. It is dated 2006. http://www.rus-deco.com/vp/JS-Lib/CustomerSites/Common/view_larger.htm?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rus-deco.com%2F510_500_csupload_20087015.jpg%3Fu%3D553230982
 
http://www.rus-deco.com/vp/JS-Lib/CustomerSites/Common/view_larger.htm?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rus-deco.com%2F514_500_csupload_20087025.jpg%3Fu%3D3016084680
:At the present moment is initiated his replacement to this picture without a single mistake and the author's portrayal: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Greater_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Russian_Empire_1700x1767_pix_Igor_Barbe_2006.jpg Earlier, the authors insisted on the presence of yellow in the figure dies with his name. For VIKI author has made an exception. However, the file with a yellow bg can remain - it has more resolution. References to it are optional for connoisseurs. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Greater_coat_of_arms_of_the_Russian_empire_IGOR_BARBE_1500x1650jpg.jpg All files are located here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Greater_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Russian_Empire 
THNKS!
Barbe Igor (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Greater Coat of Arms of the Russian Empire 1882-1917 (mass replacement)
Talk:Coat of arms of Serbia and Montenegro

message: This article has a misleading title. It's proper title should be "Coat of arms of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" and the current title "Coat of arms of Serbia and Montenegro" should be a redirect. As is explained in the article itself, the Constitutional Charter which transformed the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia into the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro stipulated that a law specifying the State Union's coat of arms should be adopted within a year of the adoption of the Charter. This was never done; and legally speaking, the State Union never had a coat of arms. Institutions of the State Union (as well as sports teams representing the country, etc.) continued to use the old Yugoslav coat of arms by inertia. The same goes for the flag and anthem (where, unlike with the coat of arms, there were proposals, but were never adopted).Andrijapfc (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading article name
Talk:Coat of arms of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes

message: Well Kingdom of SHS and Kingdom of Yugoslavia is one country wich changed its name, there is only one article about this country: Kingdom of SHS - Kingdom of Yugoslavia (it is same article!). So I think that there should be only one page about Coat of arms as well. --Stevanb 11:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with COA of the Yugoslavia
Talk:The Invincibles (rugby league)

message: This is important and worthy of an article. I am removing the importance message accordingly.GordyB 21:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I think it would look better if the clubs that Queensland players came from were listed like their NSW counterparts are. I've also removed the listing of Sydney clubs that did not provide players for the tour as I think it is uneccessary. Bongomanrae 02:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  QLD clubs? 

message: Its intro talks about the "invincibles" being a Rugby league - while the rest of the article seems to talk about a team. And it talks about the team playing in The Ashes - which is a cricket tournament. I suspect that there's nothing here that an editor with a copy of a WP:REF quality authoritative source can't fix in half an hour - but as it stands, the article RICHLY deserves its "confusing" tag. --Alvestrand 07:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article hopelessly confused?
Talk:San Francisco Proposition H (2005)

message: I made a ton of changes and additions to this article that I created back in 2006 and I added a list of Prop H opponents which was easy to find online, but I can't seem to find a list of supporters. BillyTFried (talk) 07:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Can anyone point me to a list of supporters?
Talk:SS Arezzo

message: Why were they deducted 6 points this season?Sam Hayes 21:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because of their involvement in the Calciopoli scandal. --Angelo 22:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deduction of points 2006/2007
Talk:Spotted paddle-tail newt

message: I made a start on this one, but obviously it could use some more work -- esp. in the behavior section and in the captivity section (info on these guys in zoos?).  Most of my info was gleaned from livingunderworld.org -- the original article was both a copyright violation and a description of the wrong animal. Kryptonita 21:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1
Talk:Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation

message: Okay, so this goes all the way back to 2006 when a 23:45, 12 October 2006‎ edit by Backspace added "There are small parcels of non-contiguous off-reservation trust lands in Meade County, South Dakota, northeast of the city of Sturgis."
This is not sourced, and boy, was that a bitch to find. But here's a page with links to PDFs for each reservation's 2000 census map: http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/virtual_disk_library/index.cgi/5678548/FID1724/aianhh_html/airf.htm. The specific PDF URL is http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/virtual_disk_library/index.cgi/5678548/FID1724/aianhh_pdf_files/airf/cbn2490.pdf
According to this file, Northern Cheyenne has LOTS of "small parcels of non-contiguous off-reservation trust lands", and certainly not only northeast of Sturgis. There are four such entities in Meade County: 1047, 1049, 1052 and for some reason 1053 east of 133rd Ave is separate. But there's a cluster of six of them in "Little Missouri CCD". Just south of the main rez, there's two parts labeled Ashland CCD. Further south, still north of the Wyoming border, there's two bits labeled Tongue River CCD. 
And that's just the bits specifically marked as off-reservation lands (or "Hawaiian Home Land", but that's probably not applicable here). 
Google Maps gives instead seven "springs" south of the main rez when queried. Cheers. CapnZapp (talk) 21:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  off-reservation trust lands
Talk:Cariboo—Chilcotin

message: To see so many M-dashes used as hyphens is disturbing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dash#Usage_2
Cheers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Look-aa (talk • contribs) 14:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Someone went M-dash happy
Talk:Shadow Peach

message: Seriously, does anyone even know this article exists? There are no links to it from other pages, and no one seems to be updating or working on cleaning it up. It's not really needed, because Shadow Peach and the Shadow Queen are the same character. It should either be deleted or moved into the PM2 character article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.117.6 (talk • contribs) 
:I don't know, but I do think it should be merged. TJ Spyke 00:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh...
Talk:Shift

message: "There are 8 artists with the same name"
http://www.last.fm/music/Shift
--TimoKA (talk) 14:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  artists 

message: An alliance called Shift plans a three-year campaign to improve the world through spirtual pluralism. If this movement becomes WP:NOTABLE, an article should be written and added here. David Spector 00:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shift (spiritual)
Talk:Les Nessman

message: 1,406 words on a supporting character from a 1970s U.S. TV show?
You've got to be kidding me. In addition to being written in the style of an C+, eighth-grade English class essay, this article wastes significant energy exploring a subject of little worth to the future of the human species. I loved WKRP when it was on. I'm happy when I catch it in reruns. It was fun to find a Wikipedia entry on the character.
BUT, this article -- even in its current infantile state -- is too much.
Plus, you left out any reference to his coverage of the Thanksgiving turkey drop. ("As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.")
I'd cut it, but the author would just restore it. I suggest 200 words is the outside limit for this topic.--24.211.187.175 11:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that we have 100,000 words on doofus anime characters that are ten million times less interesting or less notable than Les Nessman, who has been called by critics the greatest sitcom character ever, I'm surprised that this article isn't much longer. Suggest you read WP:RECENT before condemning an article based on its subject's time frame. Newer is not more notable. --NellieBly (talk) 01:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article gives Wikipedia a bad name 

message: Probably should add some mention of the web page "100 Words or Les Nessman" , though it seems to have bitten the dust. Also, the article needs cleanup — among other things, rearranging so that biographical items are together and there's a section for the "things he's known for" (with a better heading, of course). Will try to return soon. Lawikitejana 21:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More couch potato gibberish: 
Talk:The One with the Football

message: Why is this article up for deletion? I think its great and well-written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.31.255.66 (talk) 15:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: When the episode was broadcast, the ending with Monica and Ross in the park fighting over the football was used during the credits. However, on the DVD version, a different ending was used during the credits: Monica and Ross toss the Geller Cup down the garbage chute - but Phoebe is at the bottom, catching it for Monica. She's about to leave when Ross walks in on her to claim it for himself.
My recollection of the DVD and E4 reruns is that the ending is still Monica & Ross in the park. Which DVDs have athis alternate ending? Timrollpickering 21:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ending
Talk:Extension (mathematics)

message: This page probably ought to get organized into sections and subsections. Michael Hardy 21:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

message: there's also the notion of extending a function that's defined on a given domain to all of Rn.  (there's a question of what regularity is achievable for the extension.)  on a related note, there's a sort of converse to the theorem regarding which functions have traces on the boundary of a given domain: given a trace, does there exist a function defined on the domain with that as its trace?  there's a few articles that wikipedia needs yet if anyone finds themselves with nothing to do... ;)  Lunch 23:55, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: another analysis topic
Template talk:Mario role-playing games

message: The link to the first Paper Mario game has only "64" to identify it. With the way that the others were identified, ("Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door" as "The Thousand Year Door" and "Super Paper Mario" as "Super") what should be put for the original game since the official title was not "Paper Mario 64"
:How about adding "(n64)" to the end, this way it's not part of the title but a qualifier. Peter S. 13:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  64? 

message: Luigi's Mansion is include in this template for:
"Paper Mario 64" a reference in Luigi's diary to his winning a mansion, and in Thousand-Year Door, there are references to the game "Luigi's Mansion" (such as a crow in Twilight Town proposing a website called "Luigi's Mansion," and another crow telling him that the name has been used already). 
The "Mario & Luigi" games includes several reference a Luigi's Mansion
:This is not an RPG title, and it's definitey not in the scope of the Paper Mario series (or Mario RPG). Andre (talk) 14:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luigi's mansion 

message: This game technically isn't an RPG, but a platformer. Does it really belong here? You have no proof it was me. 20:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has RPG elements, and qualifies for falling under the Paper Mario series. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Paper Mario 

message: Why only that one, when the Game Boy Color one is just as much an RPG, and the GBC and GBA Mario Tennis games are even more RPG-ish? If we're going to include one of the Game Boy Camelot sports games, we should include all four. 100.4.156.19 (talk) 22:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mario Golf: Advance Tour?
Talk:Wyalusing Path

message: This article is currently a mess. I just removed most of the article that was a big copyvio block of text taken directly from Wallace's "Indian Paths of Pennsylvania" (and without attribution). What is left makes little sense. The trail ran from Wyalusing to Muncy PA. It passed near but not through World's End State Park and nowhere near Kettle Creek State park (far west in Clinton Co.). It ran along Muncy Creek, but nowhere near Lycoming Creek (Loyalsock Creek is between the two). I will work to fix it and leave a copyvio message at whoever left the "block o' text". Ruhrfisch 21:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i fixed loyalsock, the wyalusing trail is marked at the edge of sullivan county close to what used to be the Frasier farm, Mrs. Frasier was a teacher at SCHS.   I also fixed the kettle creek gorge natural area from state park.  All i have is information that was told me word of mouth by my dad a long time ago.  he said it came up the from wyalusing along the creek that runs from colley to that direction then it cut over the old adam's place which is the mountain outside of dushore toward  colley is watershed break between the creek that flows toward wyalusing and the creek the creek in dushore.   I think the mountain used to be called st. mary's point or something like that. The mountain seems to be part of dutch mountain I think.  In any case, it came up over that mountain in the saddle somewhere where bernie kinsley's land is up there and landed in down in that flatland that curves toward dushore.  there used to be a very old cabin on that ridge, and there is an old archeology site on the side of that hill where there is an old indian cave.   that is just lore though. --Buridan 01:28, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives by year, 1965

message: Warren Cleveland Osbourne was changed by an anonymous editor to Warren Cleveland Osborne and Edward Owens Watkins was changed by another anonymous editor to Edward Owen Watkins. These changed spellings may not match the original source file.Steven Russell 21:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name changes 
Talk:Associação Brasileira de Estatística

message: ABE is more of a non-profit organization/scientific events organizator/statistics-related periodicals and books publisher than a professional body or professional organization, but I didn't found the appropriate category.
--Lucas Gallindo 21:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 

message: Is there no English name by which the association is known? After all, this is the English language WP. --Wloveral (talk) 22:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name?
Talk:Law label

message: There's no mention of the law label's (notably the implied "lawlessness" of removing such a tag) role in popular culture, especially was a humor device concerning draconian laws. The joke of a person or character being punished and/or imprisoned for taking off the "Do Not Remove" label on a mattress is prevalent enough in Western culture to deserve mention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.31.106.35 (talk • contribs) 
: Indeed.  I could have sworn it was on here once but I can't find it in the history.  Haplolology 03:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular culture

message: Relative to the removal of law labels, I believe that much the same applies in Canada as in the U.S.A. Does anyone know if this is true and, if so, could they please update the "Law labels" page with this information and include an appropriate reference link? I am not a lawyer and I do not have a clue as to where I would find that information. --Miraclewhip 20:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of law labels in Canada? 

message: 172.58.146.155 (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did they change the tags to include the "except the by consumer" language?