lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Urban geography

message: I'd like to add to or change bits of this article. In what areas would previous editors find this acceptable? I don't want to step on any toes. --Signsowned 22:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: Does anyone know for what reasons this article (still) requires cleanup etc? Arkbar 13:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a small clean-up, but it still reads like an unreferenced essay. The city as system and city systems are unreferenced, and are posited as undisputed parts of what Urban Geography constitutes. Many postmodern geographers have confronted theories of city networks --Cooper-42 10:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Generally, the article needs to be proofread. It needs a lot more punctuation and organization of subject to object. Words like "probably" and "myriads" have to be accurately quantified. Also, the article only has one reference. Although it may be legitimately sourced, the article is suspect of plagiarism or copyright infringement. --Emana (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: It seems worthwhile to mention -- maybe in a new section -- that the world's population has largely moved from rural to urban environments. (Especially in the wake of the industrial revolution.) An example from Britain is discussed in a chapter of this book: 
-Pete (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section on urbanization? 

message: — Assignment last updated by KMorales34 (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Principles of Ecology
Talk:Urban ecology

message: — Assignment last updated by Brooklynbiology (talk) 21:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Principles of Ecology

message: — Assignment last updated by Pgress (talk) 22:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BISC 2 Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution

message: I added a few pieces of information already but I plan on focusing on positive and negative interactions between wildlife and humans. I will also be looking at info for urban green spaces. Nub345 (talk) 21:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Plans
Talk:Undercroft

message: oppose merge. i can understand the basis for the proposal, but this topic really has a lot of expansion room to treat the medieval notion of undercroft. it s on my personal list for expansion even though i may not get to it for months.  i have some decent photos and many examples of early architecture to discuss. regards Anlace 00:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merger proposal

message: An undercroft is also referred to as the baggage room where all the bags are sorted into dolly’s or ULD’s where they are taken into the aircraft or offloaded. It’s usually underneath the airport terminal and is restricted to certain employees only. 2A02:6B61:BAD6:0:BD17:8F4F:4343:F335 (talk) 19:48, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airport
Talk:Turret (architecture)

message: It may just be me, but it seems this article represents two distinct concepts - turrets on buildings and turrets on modern fighting vehicles - and may benefit from a split. --MaxBrains 21:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest spin off the whole of the gun turret business into a separate article and keep a summary on this article. When the architecture turret section builds up more detail eg building techniques examples etc (if it should happen) then it could be spun off as a whole article too. GraemeLeggett 12:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this idea of splitting the article--I came here to look for information on gun turrets and was almost deterred by the pictures of architecture. --Brandon Dilbeck 22:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I definatly agree with this, too. And since 4 people voted for the split and 0 have complained about it (and it has been proposed for more than a month by now, that's enought time to raise your voice if you don't agree with it), I'll just do it.--BSI 17:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split gun turret

message: Under the series of images in Gallery, the writing such as: "In the middle ages, it served as an administrative and religious center."  looks having problem with paragraph spacing? I don't know how to fix it. Charon77 (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery problem? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 09:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If it tells you anything about what "turret" first brings to mind, the  first version of this article was about weapon turrets. Schierbecker (talk) 03:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 January 2022
Talk:Trefoil

message: :File:KlingonInsignia.png Should probably more correctly be an asymmetrical Triskelion than a Trefoil... AnonMoos (talk) 15:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Klingon emblem

message: Is the Adidas logo a trefoil? Because, I don't think it is.Fuzzy901 (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article tries to make clear that there are two Adidas logos: one for performance products and one for casual products.  The performance products use the three stripes.  The other is a three-leafed logo, so it might be a trefoil, but the leaves don't form a circle, they sort of all point upwards.  I couldn't find a file image in wikipedia, but here is a link to an image. Adidas Trefoil Logo - ErinHowarth (talk) 19:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Adidas Logo

message: :File:Girl Scouts of the USA.svg  The Girl Scouts of the USA refer to this as a trefoil, but I am not sure that it is. It seems to me to have four leaves.  Maybe it is three leaves and a really wide, short stem...  -ErinHowarth (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girl Scouts 

message: The opening paragraph refers to the trefoil's use in "traditional Christian symbolism," but the only mention later is of this is that it was combined with a triangle that had symbolic meaning (the trinity) rather than inherent symbolism in the trefoil.  This seems a bit slight and incidental to rate the reference in the header paragraph.  Is there more here that someone could beef this part up with?  If not, mentioning this aspect in the summary paragraph feels like topic advocacy rather than neutral description.TheCormac (talk) 22:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In Gothic architecture, just the presence of a window in the shape of the outline of three overlapping circles can be symbolic of the Trinity in itself... AnonMoos (talk) 04:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Symbolism 

message: 115.135.130.182 (talk) 17:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  dating back to earliest civilizations
Talk:Mischief Makers

message: For consideration: vol. 7, 1997, pp. 48–50 czar 02:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  64 Magazine 

message: This year is the subject's 25th anniversary. Since it has been over five years since its last run on the Main Page's Today's Featured Article I figured this might be a good time to re-run it. WP:TFAR specifies to discuss with  coordinators first. Good days include June 27 (Japanese/initial release) and October 1 (North American release). Those dates might be too close to other nominations or be second picks for those days, so would it be better to just consider this for a non-date-specific run? Or should I wait until 30 days before June 27 to nominate as usual? czar 16:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: czar, you would be unlucky to have a date clash, but it happens, in April a date-linked TFAR rerun found itself against a new article for the same date. For you not to get either date would be very unfortunate. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suspect in two to three weeks, the month of May will be scheduled, and it would then be in order to nominate it for June 27. I'd like to see some community input on this, since there are a fair number of video games awaiting their first main page run..--Wehwalt (talk) 16:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TFA re-run 

message: @KGRAMR, I saw that you added this July 1997 64 Dream source. What do you see as needing to be added from it, and are you able to translate it? czar 03:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't read or speak Japanese so i don't know what it says exactly but since i noticed that it was an interview for the game more or less, i decided adding it as a refidea to anyone that may find interesting info in the magazine as with the book by Han Kikuchi. Roberth Martinez (talk) 01:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''64 Dream''
Talk:Quad Cities River Bandits

message: What is the capacity of their home stadium? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kendanielone (talk • contribs) .
:4,024. See John O'Donnell Stadium. --Iowahwyman 19:10, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The citation for this claim leads to a registration-only website, so I'm deleting it.  But the claim itself is suspect: the team's website refers to several years when the area had no team, or when a new team moved there.  So how old exactly is this particular franchise?  --Chancemichaels 13:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to confirm - this team was started in 1960.  The deleted "128 years" referred to the entirety of minor league baseball in Davenport.  That should be clear in the article now.  --Chancemichaels 17:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "128-year history"?

message: Basically, there are several former River Bandits players who are playing on the Cardinals right now (Shelby Miller, Trevor Rosenthal, Joe Kelly, etc). How many MLB games does a guy need to play before he is a "notable player"? Can Brett Wallace be added now? He's played 224 MLB games. Help me understand where to draw the line here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.81.0.28 (talk) 04:07, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure of specific criteria guidelines. Personally I think appearing in 1 major league game makes you notable; also if they have an article on here. CTF83! 09:57, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Baseball notability guidelines also say 1 MLB game. CTF83! 10:00, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Question: What constitutes a "Notable" Player?

message: Can we fix the colors of the River Bandits? They're blue now. RingoSB (talk) 02:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks for pointing that out. NatureBoyMD (talk) 03:01, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colors
Talk:Transom

message: What about 'grapevine'?  Am I imagining things, or does transom also refer to an informal communication channel... like gossip or word-of-mouth news? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.122.75.36 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 23 June 2007
Transom in architecture links with fr:Imposte or fr:Vasistas, which is a special imposte; Transom for a ship links with fr:Tableau arrière. It looks difficult to link with other WP only with one article. A desambiguation page seems preferable. (I beg your pardon for my poor englich.)--Barbetorte 21:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Town centre

message: This article needs to be , at the very least, organised. In addition, there needs to be more information that is not UK-centric. --Kmsiever 16:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tried to reorganise it into sections. Removed slightly bizarre statement that town centres only exist in UK, Ireland , Hong Kong and mainland Europe! Sionk (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: As of this version of the article, you can find
:
as a second reference in the article.  The commented-out code above was an attempt to use archiveurl/archivedate as a workaround to an existing .  If I remove the comment brackets, I get an error page back, with a title of "Internal error" and an red-bordered error box containing something like this:
:[176357fd] 2012-12-25 09:33:26: Fatal exception of type MWException
If I look at the web page source, I see the following advice:
:Set $wgShowExceptionDetails = true; at the bottom of LocalSettings.php to show detailed debugging information.
I did not follow the advice but I am documenting it here in case someone else tries to get the archiveirl to work.  72.244.206.81 (talk) 09:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 130#Internal error when using archiveurl in cite web, this error has been resolved, so I have  the commented out ref. – PartTimeGnome (talk | contribs) 16:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fatal exception of type MWException
Talk:Time-use research

message: Narrowly a Start-class.
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 00:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: Hi
Does anyone think that it is a bit odd that the four sections all talk about how people view their commute time? 
24.208.37.3 (talk) 21:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commute
Talk:Tensile structure

message: Are tents Tensile structures? --Richy 14:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tent

message: added Online fabric structure community(fstructures.com) where most of worldwide manufacturers communicate and share their experience  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellywhite (talk • contribs) 01:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: I've corrected the beam link so it no longer leads to a Japanese clothing manufacturer. Could someone make the link to the "Beam (structure)" article read as "beam" or "beams"
:Done - Leonard G. (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beam 

message: Looking for a good picture emphasizing roof or fabric of a building (notable hopefully) that uses PTFE-glass cloth.TCO (Reviews needed) 02:59, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  looking for a good picture  

message: Since Eero Saarinen and Matthew Nowicki died in 1961 and 1950, respectively, they probably haven't been promoting tensile structures since the 1960s. Some clarification would be nice.
83.248.138.107 (talk) 22:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The "Simple mathematics of cables" section is useful, but it would be nice if a section on membranes with a similar approach could be included.Graham W. Griffiths (talk) 23:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extend "Simple mathematics of cables" section to include membranes 
Talk:Team 10

message: Fernando Távora was not a member of team ten. I erased his name.Quiiiz (talk) 02:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fernando Távora 

message: I stumbled across this article and, while I was looking to see whether the 2008 request for citations could be met, I noticed that the entire 'History' section had been copied-and-pasted from http://www.team10online.org/team10/introduction.html
Because it has been there so long and no-one has returned to address the request for better citations, I've deleted 98% of the section. The 'credits and contact information' page of www.team10online.org clearly says their text is copyrighted. See WP:CV. Sionk (talk) 02:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: It is constantly vandalised. 2601:601:1001:E120:9CFF:EA65:8682:A503 (talk) 06:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There hasn't been any recent vandalism to justify protection. For an administrator to protect an article, the disruption has to be ongoing. Pages aren't protected pre-emptively. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 06:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't this page protected?
Talk:Gynerium sagittatum

message: This article began life as "Caña Brava (Gynerium sagitatum)" linked from an article stub on Chala, Peru.  It was written in almost unintelligible English.  I moved it to this page under the scientific name and the orginal text was rewritten as far as it could be interpreted.  I am not a botanist, so I'm not sure of the accuracy of the text.  Should be reviewed and, hopefully, expanded by somebody knowledgeable on the topic.--WilliamThweatt 17:21, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Expert needed" tag
Talk:Supportive housing

message: Who initiates complete overhaul of a Wikipedia article? I'd start with a proper outline, then cut and paste the material as best I could to produce a coherent article that incorporated the comments by others. Since I have less than 100 hours of experience editing Wikipedia articles, a more seasoned editor would do a better job on the outline.  On the other hand, I wrote a manual for creating a wide range of supportive / transitional houses in Alaska, USA. At the very least, I could work on bits and pieces and provide about 60 pounds of published source material.
//Don K. (talk) 00:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tried to clean-up part of this article.  There is no need to place "quotes" around certain terms like mental illnesses.  I also removed link to specific types of centers as I see that as messy for the area I cleaned up, if you wish to link to specific types of centers for follow up information please do that when talking about the center or at the end of the article. Celtic Labyrinth 18:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The content is massively biased, disingenuous and completely without substantive evidence to support most claims made e.g. the entire economic impact section is a farce, the only factor considered there is the cost to government of care.  This reads like a government brochure for those as malleable as wet clay, not a well researched article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.51.248 (talk) 04:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vapid Article

message: the article, as normal gives an american view of funding, provision and feasability bias.
In the UK the systems are totally different, and funding makes it quite viable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.133.44.18 (talk) 10:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  american only ! 

message: In addition to the concerns noted above (some in place for years now), and the fact that the request for citations template has been in place since early '07, I placed the "advert" tag on the article in hopes of attracting attention to the list of problems with the entry. I might get to it eventually; somebody else can probably do it sooner and better. 67.187.111.107 (talk) 14:38, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad Tag Placed - This Article Needs MAJOR Work

message: A request has been submitted to WikiProject United States for a new article to be created on the topic of Housing in the United States. Please join the discussion or consider contributing to the new article. Best regards, -- M2545 (talk) 08:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notification: [[Housing in the United States]]
Talk:Suburban infill

message: These topics cover pretty much the same thing, and it seems an article on suburban infill should be part of one on the broader topic of infill. Signed - Joshua Davis (articnomad) 20:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suburban Infill/Infill Merger
Talk:Street hierarchy

message: Request received to merge articles: Hierarchy of roads to here; dated June 2015.  Rationale: I think that both of the articles are about a similar topic and they have similar information. Bubby33 (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't Merge While they have similar names, Street Hierarchy and Hierarchy of Roads are completely different subjects. The former is a system of urban (or rather suburban) planning and the latter is a system of classifying roads. To merge the two would be completely nonsensical. -Lamarcus (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion

message: the abbreviation "TND" is used repetitively throughout the article, yet I can't find a single reference to what the hell "TND" stands for.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.38.142.214 (talk) 10:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  what the hell is "TND" 

message: In the Financial costs section, there is this sentence:
:Some planners and economists consider the street hierarchy to be financially wasteful, since it requires more miles of street to be laid than a grid plan to serve a much smaller population.
But then there's this, in the same section:
:Studies show that regular, undifferentiated grid patterns generally incur infrastructure costs about 20 to 30 percent higher than the discontinuous hiererchical street patterns, reflecting an analogous street length increase.
The first says hierarchy produces more street length, the second says grid produces more street length. So which is it?
C xong (talk) 00:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Less street length or more?
Talk:Storm cellar

message: Just wondering would anyone be against redirecting "storm shelter" here? Random.tomaters (talk) 04:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Just wondering

message: Imo the article should be moved to storm shelter (currently a redirect here) as this is a more general term. For example, Aljaž Tower, one of the symbols of Slovenia, is properly described as a storm shelter, but linking the article to a cellar would be incorrect. --Eleassar my talk 12:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Shelter is more appropriate than cellar - particularly since this article is not about cellars, making the point that shelters are not under a house!  I also suggest that the article be rewritten to be less colloquial.203.184.41.226 (talk) 03:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to move the article

message: I've removed a chunk of material in the Average Storm Shelter section pertaining to a "Zagorski Saferoom." Aside from reading choppily, it looks rather like a publicity piece. Even if it didn't, I'm not sure what a description of one purportedly revolutionary design would do for a section that describes an average shelter. Ourai тʃс 05:46, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zagorski Saferoom
Talk:Stanchion

message: I'm not sure how this is for Wikipedia rather than Wiktionary, but I'd also expect that if should cover the nautical meaning, typically a post with an "eye" in one end that carries a rope. - Jmabel | Talk 03:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: es:Candelero (náutica) and stanchion are not the  same things. Peter Horn User talk 14:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nautical 

message: This artical needs railway stanchions added, there are hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of them around the world supprting the overhead power lines. 220.237.117.136 (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I can not find a good annswer in overhead line, except for post. Peter Horn User talk 15:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be a traction current pylon, too tall to be called a stanchion. Peter Horn User talk 21:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railway 

message: Despite how announcers use the term, is it actually the proper term? I'd like to see some references for that claim. Djmips (talk) 02:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice Hockey
Talk:Spandrel

message: Category "Arches and entablature" doesn't exist. ??? --Owdki talk 21:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Owdki talk 19:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: The usual police about British vs American English is that the article stays the way that it was originally written.  Someone (in red no less) just made those sorts of changes and I reverted it.  Make sense?  Carptrash (talk) 15:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lest this get out of hand