lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Health consumerism

message: Added a source that seems to verify the content. Neutralizing the text. Added a wikiproject. M-BMor 13:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please comment at Talk:Patient participation#Proposal to merge articles on similar concepts.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with Patient participation
Talk:USNS Albert J. Myer

message: I started with DANFS, checked several other common web resources,
and relied on Polmar to resolve any discrepancies.
The ship's name is indeed spelled "meyer" and the fort in northern VA
is commonly spelled "myer."  So I added an "ARC-6" page and a 
"USNS Albert J. Myer" page that both redirect to the main article,
just in case.  The photo is in commons, and was taken by me in 1976, 
when I was sailing on Meyer frequently.  There are better images
that show more of the ship's lines, but we'll need to find one that's
in the public domain (or convince someone to release one).
--DaveMarr 13:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just in case this old comment leads someone to propose a name change the ship was Albert J. Myer. The ship is named for the same person, Albert J. Myer, founder of the Army Signal Corps, for which Fort Myer was named. Even the Navy preserved the Army name rather than renaming, as they did with USACS William H. G. Bullard being renamed Neptune. The photo in Commons has been corrected. Palmeira (talk) 19:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Symphony No. 1 (Dvořák)

message: needs expansion. — Andy W. (talk/contrb.) 13:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

message: About the subtitling of this work... was it by Dvořák himself?  If so, did he really name it "Bells of Zlonice", in ENGLISH?  If not, what is the actual subtitle, untranslated? Smyslov (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: List of compositions by Antonín Dvořák tells us the Czech title is "Zlonické zvony".  It seems a little obscure as to how the subtitle came about.  Dvořák was said to have referred to the work by this title (this was when he believed it to have been destroyed), but my money is on some publisher's fancy, not unlike "Moonlight", "Emperor" and other epithets being added by publishers without the composer's imprimatur. --  JackofOz (talk) 19:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subtitle

message: In the 3rd alinea, it is said that "the first movement, marked Allegro, is the longest movement of all his symphonic works". 
I doubt if that is true. The 1st mouvement of the 1st takes 13:34 minutes at my recording, but, for example, the 2nd mouvement of the 3rd takes 17:58 minutes. I have the complete symphony cycle with Rafael Kubelík conducting the Berliner Philharmoniker. Unless the tempi Kubelík uses differ so much from the usual tempi, I think that sentence should be removed. I thought it would be better to ask here first, just to make sure. 
--Hanserblich (talk) 17:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That came from the liner notes by Ray Minshull to the Istvan Kertesz complete cycle.  The full quote is: "The first movement is sombre in character and the longest of all Dvorak's symphonic movements."  However, the first performance in 1936 was in a heavily edited form, and most later recordings also make substantial cuts in the final movement.  The liner notes say "... it seems likely that the present recording represents the first occasion on which it [the symphony] has been performed complete and uncut". It's possible that Kertesz is the only major conductor to have recorded the full version.  I only have an LP, with no timings shown, and I haven't been able to find the track timings for the Kertesz set on google, but I can play it and time it if you like.   --  JackofOz (talk) 01:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just looked at my father's CD box with Kertész and I see that you're right! It's 18:55 minutes. I will add 'in the original version' in the sentence. Hanserblich (talk) 10:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

text: I confirm that 18:55 via iTunes. Here’s a perf of Mvt 1 (without the repeat, mercifully) on YouTube (in two parts). No wonder the score disappeared for over half a century! A.D. started as a doubtful orchestrator, but he got a lot better.---Schweiwikist (talk) 07:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of the 1st movement
Talk:Cyclooctadecanonaene

message: There are some great technical details in here, but even as someone who knows vaguely with NMR is, I found it more or less incomprehensible. Perhaps a 'NMR Properties' section, and a lead which can summarize why chemists might care about this compound? I may attempt this, but I lack the needed expertise, so there would be some learning to do.MinutiaeAnalysis (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Detail
Talk:List of Tampa Bay Lightning seasons

message: ;Comments from Harrias talk
* In the second paragraph you list the total number of wins and losses, along with points: as the Lightning were founded in 1992, compared to the Original Six, who have been playing for nearly 100 years; this is a reasonably irrelevant list of statistics. More relevant would be a list comparing Tampa to the other sides during their years of existence, or percentages of wins. As a list of total wins and losses is, as far as I'm concerned, pointless.
**I think it's actually value to compare it to teams like the original six. Whether we like to admit it or not, people tend to ignore the lifespan of a team, and instead look at the numbers come out of them. Either way though, I agree that other than the wins and losses, the others are a little superflous. I'll add more information about the Stanley Cup teams and trim some of the unnecessary stats in the lead. Nomader (Talk) 00:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh! Apologies: I must have clicked edit just after the promotion and not noticed it! Well done :P Harrias talk 23:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Taken from FLC. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha you're quite alright, I actually saw your comments and was about to address them when I realized that it'd already been promoted. I'll just adress what you've said here on the talk page instead. Nomader (Talk) 00:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harrias' comments from FLC 
Talk:The Ten Tenors

message: I'm dubious about the listed discography - it states that 2000's Untied is known as One is Not Enough in Europe.  However, I have a copy of the CD One is Not Enough, which includes live recordings from 2002.  Either there's another One is Not Enough CD, or the discography's wrong. The Dark 13:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is thus: Untied was the original release in Australia, and then later they re-released this CD rebadged as One Is Not Enough, and since it was re-released at this later date they added a couple of songs.  Of course, Untied is not available in Europe, so it can be "known as" One is Not Enough as the majority of the tracks are the same.  Also have a look at their official discography for further clarification. (Kjd pferd 12:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  The one I have is the One is Not Enough special edition, which I got in Florida in 2002 or 2003.  It looks like the only differences are the addition of the live tracks, That's Amore, and the Italian Medley. The Dark 22:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, glad to have helped.  It sometimes does get confusing as some albums are released in certain continents, but some tracks from one particular album appearing on albums released elseqhere!  This is the same sort of situation with the Larger than Life USA release: this is not available in Australia, but the album Tenology has a large number of it's tracks taken from the Larger than Life album.  At least Here's to the Heroes was worldwide, so that limits confusion! (Kjd pferd 00:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing Discography
Talk:Óscar García (footballer, born 1973)

message: These should be domestic league games ONLY, the same as the player stats. Will people STOP keep adding the cup game to this. Fork me (talk) 18:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manager stats 
Talk:Operation Jungle

message: I'm proposing merge this good but brief article to new section of Aftermath of World War II article, for incorporation into proposed new, expanded section immediately below existing "Post-war tensions" section, and with proposed title Clandestine Operations. Communicat (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a perfectly fine stand alone article and you provide no reasoning as to why it should be merged. Several articles link to it, while these same links would often make little or no sense if redirected to Aftermath of World War II. Occupation of the Baltic States, Baltic states under Soviet rule (1944–1991) or even Cold War would be better merge targets. Edward321 (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

text: I also see no reason to merge it into that article. It stands on it's own. It's fine to summarize information from this article there, but no reason to include this level of detail there, so if it merged, all the details would be lost. --Habap (talk) 19:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge / move suggested to aftermath of world war II 

message: I just noticed something interesting in the U.S. Army Special Forces Unconventional Warfare Training Manual. Page 1-8 lists "The Baltic States (Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia–1950s)" as an example of United States use of limited-involvement operations to pressure an adversary. This article now only mentions the British Secret Intelligence Service. What was the US role? 
* 
-- Petri Krohn (talk) 22:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Operation Jungle was British run, this mention in the US Special Forces training manual may be referring to Operation Rollback. Apparently while the British used boats for insertion, the Americans preferred air operations and parachute drops. --Nug (talk) 02:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  US involvement?
Talk:Kim Feenstra

message: Shortly after winning Holland's Next Top Model, Feenstra admitted she had been working as a prostitute, which is a legal occupation in the Netherland. Respresented here are three references from one of the leading opinion magazines in The Neterlands (Elzevier), the biggest newspaper (De Telegraaf) and the biggest online newssite (nu.nl). Why can't this be named in the English wikipedia? It's well documented at the Dutch page. Even Feenstra herself is very open about this fact. It even caused rumours her contract, that she won with Holland's Next Top Model, would be terminated, but in the end the companies decided to get behind her. Belsen (talk) 10:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Feenstra and prostitution

message: "Wiki Proficiency", a paid editing service, claims they worked on this article:
*https://www.wikiproficiency.com/wiki-profiles
--A. B. (talk • contribs  •  global count) 04:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the tag. Looking at the page history it seems unlikely they actually worked on this, as they appear to only have existed since 2022. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paid editing
Talk:Malicious prosecution

message: :It also mentions "sixteen states" without specifying that it's US states that are meant. Malicious prosecution is part of other legal systems - the Canadian and English systems to name but two. I'm going to put a globalize tag on this article. 86.143.48.55 (talk) 20:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than put a globalize tag on the page why don't you simply clarify the article itself? I've read several of your edits and you quite clearly have some kind of a bias against Americans. Not saying there's necessarily anything wrong with--I'm an American and work with a bunch of Irish and have a bias against the UK, but that doesn't mean I need to plant a flag everywhere...I'd simply edit the article to be more approriate. Bush sure has given the haters an excuse to be pissed that they were'nt born in the US. I have edited the article to appropriately state what you failed to add and also removed the banner  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.183.32.50 (talk) 03:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More bias from non US folks, in this case the UK

message: The article currently states:
::[ . . . ] The taking of an appeal, even a frivolous one, is not enough to constitute an abuse of process. The mere filing or maintenance of a lawsuit, even for an improper purpose, is not a proper basis for an abuse of process action.
The article goes on to cite a California case regarding frivolous appeals.
With respect to frivolous appeals, should this language be modified? Is the purpose here to say that frivolous appeals are not an "abuse of process," but only for the purposes of evaluating whether the wronged party has a cause of action for malicious prosecution? I'm rusty on tort law.
Obviously, filing a frivolous appeal is an abuse of process in the sense that the courts, especially federal courts, may impose heavy monetary penalties on parties who file frivolous appeals. See Frivolous litigation. That's why I'm wondering whether the language in the article needs to be modified. However, perhaps someone who is more familiar with the law on the tort of malicious prosecution should have a first crack at it (??). Famspear (talk) 16:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about frivolous appeals
Talk:Supercritical flow

message: this is all wrong, i wanted to find subcritical flow- but it redirected me to supercritical flow. complete opposites!
please fix this up.
1. Why not merging this article with the one about Froude number??
2. Very poorly written article; gravity acceleration is not always 9.81, it actually depends on the latitude of the place where it is measured
130.225.73.173 (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of endangered animals of North America

message: Currently only mammals have a citation. Endangered species lists can change, and links to the most current information are needed. I also suspect the insect and arachnid subheading is woefully incomplete.Animalparty (talk) 01:31, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations/references needed throughout 

message: I have corrected the entry by adding the word "squirrel" that appears to have been dropped, but the Wikipedia page to which that leads lists it as "LC."  In the light of the 2009 date of validity I do not feel justified to remove it, but someone who understands the conventions better than I may wish to address that discrepancy.
Pantagnosis (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delmarva Peninsula fox squirrel 
Talk:New Moon (1940 film)

message: I have removed most of the information for the second half of this article because it applies to the original stage version of "The New Moon", and not to the film versions. Both film versions use notably different storylines, and even the names of the characters are somewhat different. There are also fewer songs in the film versions than there are in the play.AlbertSM (talk) 18:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Poster - New Moon (1940) 01.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 11, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-02-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Poster - New Moon (1940) 01.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Ceija Stojka

message: Hi
Difficult to believe that a major error could be perpetuated for so long (this is not a 'young' article!). The web source which is widely used to corroborate most of her article's content is German in origin. When translating the month of birth, someone (I have not delved deeply into the history of the editing) has interpreted "Mai" to be "March" in English, when it actually transcribes as "May". I have therefore urgently made this change, as it is a crucial snippet of information. Obviously, if someone knows that the source is wrong, they would correctly post a new one to back up the "March" birthmonth claim. If I am in error, then hopefully someone will do just that. As it stands, though, my edit makes the article line up with the web source as known and linked to. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 18:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Month of birth
Template talk:WikiProject Michael Jackson

message: I have removed the picture from the template (project banner), as it is a fair use image. Such image should only be used in articles for identification (i.e. in the article about this specific record), or in other articles where the image is discussed for some reason. In this project banner, it can be replaced by a free picture of the artist, so fair use is not valid in this case. Fram 14:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:T. T. Toliver

message: NPOV is questioned when he is called "extremely dangerous", "a key member" without references. McKorn (talk) 03:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done & done. Gerardw (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Now That's What I Call Music! 25 (U.S. Edition)

message: Big Girls Don't Cry & Thnks fr th Mmrs are not going to be on NOW 25. The songs are too late They might be on the next album, but not this one. Also, Hinder has a clear shot at getting on the album because of its radio play. I don't see the new Lloyd song getting on yet. Yellowstone County Girl 14:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Malls in Montreal

message: Oops, after examining the maps, it seems that the Carnaval mall building is entirely in Greenfield Park, however the old Moores building, the Lexus dealership as well as a good portion of the parking lot is still in Brossard.  It's good to see that Wikipedians are paying attention, even to these small details. Thanks  !  Jsmaster24 14:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Carnaval mall is NOT located in Brossard
Talk:Gambas

message: Pictures of Gambas programs are not very representative. How about pictures of some nice GUIs, OpenGL projects etc?
88.114.61.210 (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better pictures? 

message: Gambá means "skunk" in Portuguese... not Virginia Opossum.... it's my first language, don't question it. Peteturtle 18:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad translation 

message: There is a new website about & for Gambas, which includes a bug tracker: http://www.gambasrad.org. Should that be mentioned here somewhere? Kirrus (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Web site 

message: This section claims VB array indexes can start with 0 or 1. Per the online help for VB5 and VBDos, array indexes can start with any legal index value. Ex: Dim X(10 To 15) As String
IIRC ["if I remember correctly"], this was true of other versions as well. I'm not sure which version introduced the option.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.69.193 (talk) 06:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences from VB 

message: The article says Gambas programs execute faster than Perl or Python scripts.  This is a bit disingenuous.  I had the opportunity to compare the GNOME 2 version of "Mines" with an example program of "MineSweeper" included with Gambas 3, and found the Gambas version of the game to respond rather sluggishly to mouse inputs as compared to the GNOME version written in C.  There was no significant improvement in performance with the compiled Gambas version of the program, either.  The article could be improved by adding some objective benchmark information on executable size, speed, etc. — QuicksilverT @ 19:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Execution speed 
Template talk:Nepal topics

message: On 14 June 2007, IP editor 202.51.76.234 deleted the Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya library from the "Culture" section of this template. The Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya library was added to the template on 28 September 2006 by Joelr31 with the remark: "adding topics removed from main article".  As I see it, this template is used as a topically organized see also reference for users on article related to Nepal.  If the library is notable, which I do not know, then I see no reason why it shouldn't be in the template.  If the library is not notable, then the appropriate procedure is AfD, not deletion from the template without discussion. On this restricted basis, I have restored the library to the template. Any editor challenging the notability of the Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya library is encourged to do so using the AfD procedure.   --Bejnar 14:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya library

message: Please update and resort this template with all the topics regarding Nepal. Widen this templates.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achlochan (talk • contribs) 15:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: I was shocked to find out that someone has made it so that this template automatically converts into :Category:Colonial History of Nepal which is a completely nonsensical phrase. Suddenly, we have years old articles on a zillion different topics about Nepal all populating that ridiculous category. I suspect some registered editor might have been POV pushing, and it went unnoticed. Please fix this asap. Just look at that category page to see how ridiculous it all is. Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 20:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the link, which had been added with this edit. I'm not sure I'd call it vandalism and haven't reverted the entire edit, but the link doesn't belong, and it certainly shouldn't have categorized every Nepali topic in the category. The category itself likely should be deleted, too, as well as parent category :Category:Colonial History. That's an unrelated issue. Due to server cache issues it may take some time for the pages bearing the template to no longer be listed at :Category:Colonial History of Nepal; on any specific page you can purge the cache to resolve the issue.  Huon (talk) 20:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undetected vandalism
Talk:Closed

message: This should really be a disambiguation page. It's barely a fluffed up dictionary definition, and there are many useful pages that should be linked when a user searches for "closed". A few math examples:
* Closure (mathematics)
* Closed manifold
* Closed orbits
* Closed set --Wafulz 14:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, such a list was created, but strongly deleted.  --Piet Delport 15:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a disambiguation page. That's a list.--Wafulz 16:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Right.  --Piet Delport 04:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Make this a disambiguation page
Talk:XCCDF

message: I've removed the link to Secure Elements web site home page from external links. I've done this because the page in question is not directly relevant to XCCDF (indeed it doesn't even contain the word XCCDF), and putting it there rather smacks of link farming.
If the Secure Elements web site contained a page that brought something new to the information available on XCCDF, then linking that page would, IMHO, be acceptable. Even better would be to write the article behind the current Secure Elements redlink, and link their web site from there. -- Chris j wood 15:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Secure Elements web site