lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Campaignbox Occupation of Indian Territory North of the Arkansas River

message: Are there any more battles that belong in this campaignbox?  If not, this campaignbox should be deleted or absorbed into another campaignbox since one battle does not equal a campaign. Roy Al Blue 14:03, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite the contrary — a campaign could take a long time and cover a great distance and have only one battle, or even no battles at all. See: http://www.nps.gov/hps/abpp/battles/bycampgn.htm which was the basis for most of the campaignboxes on Wikipedia. That site lists numerous one battle campaigns. Also see Tudor Vladimirescu#Uprising. His campaign started in January 1821 and in May 1821 it was over with no battles fought, just an advance on, and occupation of Bucharest in March and two months rule. Then the retreat of Tudor's army in May, as the Ottomans occupied Bucharest without meeting resistance. That's still a campaign. Mojoworker (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Category talk:Software development process

message: Currently editing articles that will eventually be part of this category.  See also :Category:Software development; my current theory is that that will become a parent category for this.  I think that stuff that directly discusses processes (eg Waterfall process) or 'steps' (eg Requirements analysis) should go directly in this category and be removed from the software development category. --David.alex.lamb 14:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Daniel Tucker (minister)

message: The claim that this Daniel Tucker was the inspiration for the song "Old Dan Tucker" is quite specious. As far as I can tell, it's based on one magazine article from the 1960s (I've got a photocopy at home, and I can post the particulars later) and not much else. The Chamber of Commerce of Elbert County, Georgia, has sort of embraced the story to drum up tourism. The tune to the song has long been a part of American folklore, but the words were likely penned by Dan Emmett, who probably had no knowledge of Daniel Tucker the reverend. And calling Daniel Tucker an "American folk legend" is quite a stretch. — BrianSmithson 14:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Further note: The long article linked to from this text is a verbatim copy of the 1960s magazine article. I'll still try to provide more information later. — BrianSmithson 14:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm glad to hear that; I feared that maybe you were an employee of the Elbert County Chamber of Commerce! :) I agree, Daniel Tucker has borderline notability. I plan to do a large expansion on "Old Dan Tucker" in the near future; when I do, I'll try to put a bit of information here as well. — BrianSmithson 14:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to the song
Talk:William James Loudon

message: This is wrong:  William J. Loudon and James Loudon are two different people.  One of them was a geologist (William J) and I think he is the one the mountain was named after.  The other one, (James) was the Physicist and President of the University of Toronto.  James Loudon's dates were 1841-1916  I am not yet a practiced enough Wiki expert to delete all of the errors contained here, including the link to the University of Toronto page, but I will put a note there and hope that someone can fix it.
Addendum.  I did a quick fix on this but it probably needs more work. Lostphd 14:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Phil Foglio

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Even though Phil Foglio is not primarily a webcomic artist, because of his work on Girl Genius, the webcomics wikiproject includes his entry. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 14:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: &nbsp;

message: Added two sources and replaced the citation and verification needed tags.  The source for the second is an interview with Phil Foglio; while I'm not sure if that's normally a reliable source, it's discussing his comic's finances, which would be self-released information in any case.  If I'm wrong on this, please re-insert the appropriate tag(s) after the links so as to indicate that this link is a source of the information but it still needs further sourcing/verification; otherwise we'll just have people repeating the cycle).  --CrazyDreamer 17:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I think there are a few more Myth books that have art by Phil, but I don't want to add them without confirmation.
They are:
* Robert Asprin's Myth Adventures Volume 1 
* Robert Asprin's Myth Adventures Volume 2 
* Myth-Gotten Gains 
Can anyone confirm any of these?
--Powerlord 04:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a dummy... Google Book Search has the illustrator credits for these and they're all Phil. --Powerlord 04:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Phil Foglio Art? 
Talk:Kaja Foglio

message: This image is of a comic cover but the article is not about the comic so it probably is not ok to include it here.Filceolaire 20:39, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with the image license 

message: In looking up (innocuous) information on Ms. Foglio, note that you might need to search for "Kaja Murphy" or "Kaja Murphy Foglio" in addition to "Kaja Foglio." -- Quartermaster (talk) 14:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be sure to note variations on her name when searching for information 

message: Why does this article redirect to Girl Genius?  Girl Genius is not Kaja's only work.  In fact, if you look at some older Magic: The Gathering cards, you'll see her name as the artist on them.  A good example off the top of my head is the 4th Edition version of Soul Link.
--Powerlord (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Girl Genius? 
Talk:Gelfond–Schneider theorem

message: A question .... do there exsist transcendental numbers that are not of the form ab (with a real, b not both real and rational)? In other words, does tehconverse of the theorum hold? I feel the answer to this should be included in the main article - though I apreciate that it may currently be an open question. Tompw 14:15, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There must be, since there are only countably many numbers of the ab with a and b algebraic, but there are uncountably many transcendental numbers. Ben Standeven 21:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A valid nonconstructive proof. Ironic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.163.255.2 (talk) 21:15, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Cantor's diagonal argument, as well as enumeration of algebraic numbers by integers, are perfectly constructive.—Emil J. 10:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  @Tompw : The correct spelling is "theorem". 2607:F140:6000:6:301E:C1F5:1DC0:CFEB (talk) 10:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

message: I really think it's more perspicuous to rule out this case than have it lurking behind the non-zero logarithm criterion: I for one was confused.  And it doesn't detract from the power of the theorem, since if you want it for exp(2πin) just apply the theorem to (-1) instead.   Doctor Adachi (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The case α=1 

message: The link to a "proof" of the theorem does not contain a proof, it is a set of class notes and the first sentence is "we begin by stating some results without proof". Patronus Potter (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read it past the first sentence, you will find that it actually does include a fairly complete proof of the Gelfond–Schneider theorem (it starts in the middle of page 27), albeit under additional assumptions that α and β are real and α > 0. The "results without proof" are some variants and generalizations of the theorem which are only mentioned in the introductory part to give more context.—Emil J. 13:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: The article should contain a synopsis of the proof written to be accessible to a general audience.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.28.91.31 (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof 

message: Since this theorem seems to apply for any value of b\in\mathbb{C}\setminus\mathbb{Q}, shouldn't the statement of the theorem, state this? It currently says that b is irrational, which means it is a real number, and so wouldn't allow numbers with nonzero imaginary part. --Lukeuser (talk) 03:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is <math>b</math> irrational, or just not rational?
Talk:Huntington College

message: Founded in 1897, Huntington College (Huntington, Indiana) became Huntington University in 2005. For verification see institutional news release. Currently, the Wikipedia entry for "Huntington College" is improperly redirected to "HuntingDon College", an unrelated school in Alabama. Jpaff 14:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the redirect from Huntington College to Huntington University. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 16:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Radiocarbon year

message: so BP ~= AD*1.03 and 0 AD was not ~1950 BP but ~2008,5 BP ?  07:29, February 23, 2006 Ollj
:How do you arrive to such nonsense conclusions? If you explain, I'll explain too. Jclerman 14:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ??? 

message: Jclerman 17:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  delete rather than merge 

message: ...IMHO (Talk) 15:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge rather than delete 

message: All of the information on this page was already on the Radiocarbon dating page. Problem solved. 24.126.199.129 19:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Didn't need to do anything
Talk:Kubotan

message: This article is presented as an advertisement, and not informative in the least. It does not present history, a picture, or a good description.  Instead it presents a 'false' series of claims about the weapons use and capabilities. It is the wielder of a weapon that makes a weapon effective, not the weapon itself, and in this case... it's a gimmick. It was created by Takayuki Kubota (the weapon was named after himself). Although it has been claimed to initially have been created for "unarmed undercover police officers in Japan," this has not been substantiated.  What has been substantiated is that it has been widely advertised in martial art magazines and comic books and is commonly mispresented as a traditional weapon.  - Roy Locke
: For one, if the accuracy is being disputed - the person making such claims should go to task and fix it. I do not know much of the history of a kubaton but I added the template so this could be settled. FiftyOneWicked 04:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  If that were the case, all weapons would be gimmicks and their use and effectiveness merely subjective.  The article now contains a brief history, clear picture and good description.  Be that as it may be, it is still a recognized and useable weapon and as a testament to its usefulness, I have witnessed court officers and clerks, security and prison officers carry this weapon.  Kaoloy (talk) 12:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy Dispute 

message: It seems to me that the Kubotan is merely a brand name Kubaton, which is a legitimate martial arts weapon. It is basically just a shorter yawara with a keyring. Perhaps this article should be merged with Kubaton. Chriszuma 12:02, 18 December 2006
It is unclear the relation between the Kubaton and the Kubotan. I suspect that they are either alternate spellings of one another, or that Kubotan is a brand of Kubaton. I am looking into the matter. Chriszuma 12:23 18 December, 2006
: I did some research and it turned out that Kubaton is actually an alternate spelling of Kubotan, which is actually a registered trademark of Takayuki Kutoba. I went ahead and merged the articles, and performed a major overhaul on the article itself. I removed the disputed tag because I confirmed the accuracy of the points in question, and removed some exaggerations. Chriszuma 15:07 18 December, 2006
:: Kubaton is actually a misspelling of Kubotan, but it is sometimes used. Nevertheless both terms are included in this article Kaoloy (talk) 12:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Kubaton? 

message: Lots of references at the bottom.. mostly to one author. Needs a lot more inline citations. Should include some other credible sources as well. Jesse Crouch (talk) 17:33, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs inline citations 

message: I've taken out this picture. While one might argue that the shown object does have some similarities with Kubotan, and maybe some company is even selling it under that description, it must be absolutely obvious that the object has much more in common with a Blackjack. --BjKa (talk) 13:22, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture removed
Talk:WTXL-TV

message: According to the November 29, 2006, edit, the editor claims WTXL is a variation of WXLT because of its ownership by Calkins Media, which also owns the Sarasota station WWSB (the former WXLT).  The call letters WTXL have been used since 1983, long before Calkins bought WTXL and three years before Calkins bought Sarasota's WXLT (WWSB).  The editor's claim of WTXL's meaning needs to be verified. Tampa94Tallahassee03 16:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call letter meaning 

message: This station's website is non-existant.  I hope someone that works for the station reads this.  I live in Valdosta, GA and have MediaComm cable.  WXTL blocks WSB (another ABC affiliate) on MediaComm when WXTL thinks the same show is being broadcast.  Tonight at 8 was Wife Swap on WXTL, at 8 on WSB was a PrimeTime news special by WSB but it was blocked.  WXTL - Do better research when you block programs.  They aren't always exactly like yours.  Thank you.  --Mjrmtg 01:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will call the station tomorrow. They are still blocking programs when they are not the same. WSB was showing Atlanta's 4th of July Parade while WTXL was showing soaps and they blocked WSB. --Mjrmtg 17:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channel Blocking 
Talk:WTLH

message: WTLH is now the call sign associated with Fox and channel 49 rather than with MeTV. Other associated call signs are WBVJ, WBFL, WTLF, and ETWC. I'm not certain how to correctly edit this page but think it should be updated to reflect this adjustment by Sinclair.
Joemann 12:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Change in use of call letters
Wikipedia talk:Signature tutorial

message: I made the code for a signature I like, but it is not working. The code is this: Waddles 🗩 🖉 
...and it appears as this: Waddles 🗩 🖉. When I try to save it, the message "Invalid raw signature. Check HTML tags." comes up. I really like it, so I would like to know if someone could point out any mistakes in it that I missed, since I checked and everything looked fine to me. WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 03:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: i mean this is really late and all but if you're still having trouble, maybe try putting quotes for the colors of your icons? like this: 🗩 hope this helps! phrogge 'sup? 23:57, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Could someone point out what I'm doing wrong in this signature?

message: Atomic putty? Rien!  19:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Testing 

message: Are all of the "Real-life examples" in the list on this article page approved for use? I recently copied my own signature from a user named  and when I asked about it in the Teahouse, the point was raised that, "...the link to your talkpage is unnecesseraly tiny." Am I, or am I not, allowed to use the signature that I now have put together. I like it a lot!  — Moops ⋠T⋡ 15:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Real-life examples"
Talk:Internet appliance

message: So in principle, an Internet appliance is a portable, wireless dumb terminal? JIP | Talk 14:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it simply means "a single purpose thingy for accessing the internet".  Those kiosks in airports that let you browse the web are internet applicances, as are WebTVs.  They can be, but certainly don't have to be, either wireless or portable, and even the walled-garden variety aren't really dumb enough to be dumb terminals like a Sun Ray. Indeed, most (all, really) internet applicances failed because they weren't dumb (and thus cheap) enough: you could get a cheap PC for the cost of an Audrey (or a small amount more), and do all the same stuff and much more (PCs having overwhelming economies of scale). Truly dumb terminals have never worked in the home, because the connection was (and probably still is, really) too poor. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 17:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: *Oppose - connectivity may not necessarily imply internet. Some cell phones, an information appliance, doesn't have internet connectivity. Also POS devices, etc. that connect don't necessarily have internet.--Jondel 02:41, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of [[Information appliance]]

message: These types of devices may have a hard drive and may actually be in fact a computer that performs a function or functions that in effect interact with the internet but do not use a computer to interface with the app. or Internet.
--Akc9000 18:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Def. Needs to be corrected 

message: Why is the iPad considered an internet appliance? Isn't it's main function to run software from the App Store (on the device). --MiffTheFox (talk) 23:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  iPad
Talk:Michael Chaturantabut

message: This article has a lot of issues mainly related to verifiability - there is only one source cited and not a highly credible one.  Please keep in mind that this is the biography of a living person and requires extra attention.  It reads somewhat like an advertisement.
On a larger issue, this article and the article on extreme martial arts both credit Chaturantabut with the development, creation and brand of "extreme martial arts" and/or "XMA".  There are no citations from reliable sources on either of these articles.  This must be removed if reliable sources are not added and is for now considered a statement of opinion.
Jesse Crouch (talk) 04:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple issues

message: Im afraid that there isnt any sources citing his ancestry here, even though the imdb and the few sources out there stated that he's only "Thai American". If anybody is able to provide a source to prove his Chinese ancestry it would be good, as per wikipedia Wikipedia:Cite your sources policy/guideline. Thank you.Mr Tan (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese?
Talk:Embrace (American band)

message: Embrace and Rites of Spring were not "emo" bands even though some people say they have paved the way for that musical style. The music they played was more on the margins of "thoughtfull punk/hardcore"  a blending of punk/hardcore music with positive and sometimes questioning lyrics about self control and personal struggle infused with just understanding the meaning of "treat others as you yourself would want them to treat you," straying away from the label punk rock gets as anarchy, drugs, destruction, etc. Embrace revelutionized punk and put out the message to care for oneself and others just as Minor Threat did in the past with being strait edge. And people used to think Minor Threat was a skinhead band! Some punk rock songs and bands today speak of unity, and have a pasionate goal to make the world they live in better and people don't call them "emo" and you can tell that D.C. hardcore helped found the basis for alot of the punk music today. So to call this "emo" would be like calling all birds ducks because emotions, such as anger, sadness, or fun, are in all types of music because music invokes emotions. So "emo" bands should find a new genre to go by insted of a word so undescriptive. So don't come together to sedate yourselfs and destroy, unite to live and make life and peace prosper.  
Embrace wasn't an emo band, they could be catagorized has a hardcore or post-hardcore band, but not emo. They were influential to emo though, but you can't call them something that technically didn't exist yet.--Skeev 15:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: « I don’t know what “emo” is. “Emo” was RITES OF SPRING and EMBRACE, and everything after that is… I don’t know what it is. But it’s not eyeliner and it isn’t faux-melodrama, and it’s not like, ‘I want to be buried in your back yard.’ » Dan YEMIN Frankff 23:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Honour and Justice Alliance

message: The article was turned into a redirect, but this was undone on the idea that it's contrary to what the Afd "consensus" is.  A reasonable time has passed, though, so I see no reason to continue the Afd.  I won't close it myself (since I was involved in the discussion), but to me, closing this as a redirect is the way to go.  It'll satify all the "delete" people who don't think this should have a seperate article, but it's transparent and doesn't lose any content, just in case the folks at Utopia (online game) decide they want to merge some of this content in.  IMO, it's foolish to overlook reasonable compromise options like redirecting just because it didn't occur to most people in the Afd.  Friday (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing
Talk:Aotearoa Music Awards

message: Phantom kiwi, making a separate article for each year makes no sense.  All those articles should be deleted/merged into this one.  There is not ever going to be enough information in any of those articles to justify having them be separate articles.  --Xyzzyplugh 15:15, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of Seperate Articles 

message: This article is now a mess, due to the fact that someone was halfway through the process of adding large numbers of articles for each year's tui awards, when the process was halted by having them nominated for deletion.  The articles have now all been redirected, and this article badly needs to be rewritten now.  If no one else does it, I probably will eventually, but as I know nothing about the new zealand music awards, new zealand music, or even new zealand itself, my rewrite would likely consist of deleting the majority of the article and leaving a stub.  --Xyzzyplugh 02:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note. I'm a New Zealander, so I'll try to work on it over the next few weeks and notify Wikiproject New Zealand. --Dom 15:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I think most of the concerns Xyzzyplugh raised have been fixed - the links now point to a section of the relevant (YEAR)_in_New_Zealand page and have been organised in a nicer looking table. I've also taken care of the obvious vandalism, and I'll hopefully add a bit more information soon. Anyway, I don't think the article needs a complete rewrite anymore, just work, so I'll remove the tag. --Dom 14:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Needs Major Rewrite 

message: We're now missing information on the winners of the awards from 1996 to 2004. The winners for 2006 haven't been announced yet from what I can tell --Dom 14:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Winners 

message: I propose that New Zealand Music Award for Critics' Choice Prize be merged into New Zealand Music Awards. The Critics Choice Prize is a prize category within the NZ Music Awards. While it has its own award ceremony, I don't think this makes it suitable for having its own article. It would be better suited as a sub-area within the main NZMA article.Robyn2000 (talk) 13:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 