lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Courtney Mitchell

message: Please do not add any more quotes to this article. We do not need an endless list of things she has said. I've removed some of the newer and less interesting ones to cut down the size of the section. Sweetie Petie 20:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 

message: Do we really those bits of triva? They seem quite pointless. Crazy Eddy 19:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agreed and got rid of them. Sweetie Petie 21:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triva 

message: *Mitchell kids to return to Walford -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 19:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I cant decide.GunGagdinMoan 15:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I think so but what info can be added from those sources? AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Little bit about Megan Jossa and some stuff about Cortney's personality I think.GunGagdinMoan 19:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say merge it then but also make a note of those references on the talk page of the other article, unless you want to add them while you merge? AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add while I merge.GunGagdinMoan 14:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Todt Hill

message: The map displaying the photo of Todt Hill's location on Staten Island is incorrect. The triangle siting the hill is actually where Grymes Hill is located. Todt Hill is actually centrally located. The map below is mostly accurate though the highlighted boundaries include areas more properly designated as Dongan Hills Colony or even Emerson Hill as you reach the northern extent that is delimited.
http://www.hermanrealtors.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/IHCA_map3.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeRoiSoleil (talk • contribs) 15:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thumbnail of Todt Hill Location Map
Talk:Argo Tea

message: Hi, I was interested in purchasing Argo Tea on 7-22-2021 and I couldn't find any place that had it in Minneapolis-St.Paul.
CVS used to carry it. Fresh Thyme as well. Nothing!
I googled and one article told of one of the partners moving out of their building in Chicago. He said it was unfortunate, or something. No other comment. 
I don't know how to work Wikipedia; asking anyone reading this with that skillset to update the article. 
Thanks.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kornshell (talk • contribs) 08:53, July 23, 2021 (UTC) 
 
Argo Tea shifted from cafés to selling bottled tea drinks in 2020. Golden Fleece Beverages bought it, but it still uses the Argo Tea name. One of the founders is listed as the executive, per a source I used in the article. I added this to History section and to the lead. You can buy leaf teas online at the Argo Tea website. I think all cafés are gone, perhaps a pandemic decision. - - Prairieplant (talk) 06:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argo Tea went out of business
Talk:List of seaQuest DSV episodes

message: The images that have been created for this article are great, but I fear they could run afoul of Wikipedia's ever-tightening fair use rules. I just checked a couple of random images and all they have is a copyright line and a "TV screenshot" image tag. My understanding is this is no longer enough and each image pretty much has to include a statement including why it was created and where it will be used. As in "Image created from the first season DVD release for the purpose of illustrating the episode 'Episode Name'." I know that this might create a bit of work for the original uploader, but it's probably better than having a copyright-sensitive user or, worse yet, a bot, decide the image isn't "fair use" enough. I personally have stopped uploading images of any type because the rules keep changing every other day, it seems. 23skidoo 20:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image use tags
Talk:Alice Munro

message: I think so, given how relevant it is to this subject and what MOS:UNDERLINK has to say about that. It was recently unlinked, though, reasoning it's a common term in WP:OVERLINK terms. Either of us might be right, so it's up to you, the uninvolved third party. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm OK with linking it in this instance, seeing as Munro is mentioned at that article. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 23:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to hear. Unless you plan to do it yourself, I think I'll wait a day or two to see if anyone else minds either way. I'm a bit "gunshy" this past year on anything even approaching an edit war (for better or worse). InedibleHulk (talk) 00:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should [[short story]] be linked?
Talk:Godhead (band)

message: In the discography section, the album 'Godhead' links to an album by another band, not the one by Godhead.
82.14.90.167 20:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed some red links and those that are circular. It was "overwikified".Bearian 21:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I though the proper spelling of the band name was gODHEAD. Netrat_msk (talk) 11:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band name 

message: I see "Industrial rock, industrial metal, alternative rock, alternative metal, gothic rock" listed. Could we just use "industrial rock, gothic rock, and alternative metal"? Seems redundant to have the words "alternative" and "metal" appear twice and the word "rock" three times. I think we all get it.Hsxeric (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 
Talk:Dummy head recording

message: I suggest this article be merged with Binaural recording since they really cover the same thing, just with different names. -- Egil 20:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Because you are not using a dummy, should this really qualify as "dummy head recording"? I have removed references to it because the article creation includes an external link to a product that does this, making it appear to be included for the sake of an advertisement. Radiodef (talk) 04:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose one could squabble that it's not a "dummy head", but really, it's just using a real head instead of a dummy head, so it is actually "dummy head recording". One of the problems with the technique is that for best results the user has to sit in their seat as if they were indeed a dummy, because their movements are reflected into the recorded audio stream. I don't know if the product was included as an advertisment, or even if it still exists. IIRC, someone challenged the existence of the technique, and the link might have been added as a response to that. I don't have the time right now to search the history to discover if my memory is faulty. htom (talk) 00:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dummy" head recording on the head of a real person 

message: "Within the film industry Demolition was the first radio drama recorded using a dummy head."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.93.233.246 (talk) 02:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What on earth does this mean? 

message: "In 2015, Singaporean singer-songwriter JJ Lin released his debut experimental album From M.E. to Myself, using dummy head recording. This is also the first album in pop music industry using this technology.[12]"
Lou Reed's "The Bells", released in April 1979, was recorded with the dummy head method. This is mentioned in the Wikipedia article for said album and discussed in some detail in the liner notes for "NYC Man" (2003). It was originally released on Arista, which is definitely part of the "pop music industry". The above quoted bit reads like an advertisement for JJ Lin, and is factually inaccurate. Therefore, I think it ought to be removed. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 14:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @82.176.221.176 There's also an earlier reference written in [NGC 891] regarding Edgar Froese's first solo album which supposedly used it as far back as 1974. 98.202.156.58 (talk) 02:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downright incorrect information
Talk:Anglo-Persian War

message: I have made a start on this article will add more later or feel free yourself.Tristan benedict 20:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: I just expanded the article substantially, adding in details and inserting a section on diplomacy.  It would be nice to have more information on the Persian side, but little information is available in English.  There were some judgment calls on what details are pertinent, so feel free to overrule me if you think that I've included something irrelevant or excluded something essential.  Weisacre 23:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: This article has been brought into the ambit of Indian Military History project as the majority of the troops and existing units are Indian.
I have proposed merger of the article Persia (1855-56) (Battle honour) as it describes the same article. However, I have details very deep in Sapper history and this article gives a very broad brush. There were four battle-honours given for this and fighting took place in two different areas. In urget need of being brought to a satisfactory level. AshLin (talk) 05:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Persia 1856-57 (Battle honour) should be merged to Anglo-Persian War. --Wayiran (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: There is a plaque in Lichfield Cathedral.  Most other plaques are to the Staffordshire Regiment.  Is it known what he was commanding? JRPG (talk) 15:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Col James Stopford, killed at Reshire December 9th 1856
Talk:Mario Kempes

message: he is the master of football.
:Yes, he is... He deserves a better article. I can't know detailed information about him because I am from a different continent but Argentinians can expand it. With respect, Deliogul 22:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says: "...was widely criticized after commentating on the 2008 semifinal Champions League game between Manchester United and Barcelona, in which he not only openly condoned 'simulation' (i.e. attempting to trick officials), but claimed that those who follow the rules of fair play never win."
Who was he criticized by? What were his actual words?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.200.64.14 (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism?

message: The award was created in 1982. RSSSF is wrong. He won an unofficial award. 
https://web.archive.org/web/20160630203029/http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/fifafacts/mcwc/ip-301_03a_fwc-awards_22643.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.2.121.77 (talk) 03:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kempes didnt win the World Cup Golden Ball 

message: There is an omission: there is not details about 5 goals in List of International Goals scored by Mario Kempes. 83.58.171.100 (talk) 21:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just 15 goals, not 20 in List of International Goals
Talk:My Machine

message: I'm deleting the "About the album" section per WP:OR on the recommendation of a more experienced editor. I think the analysis should be left to the reviews, of which I could only find one on PopMatters, and the Allmusic review which was previously in the external links section. --Philodespotos 20:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting album analysis
Talk:Shadow zone

message: I removed the cleanup tag.  I don't think all stubs should be tagged as needing a cleanup.  A stub tag should suffice.  Epachamo 22:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There're two articles talking about the same thing, Seismic shadowing and Shadow Zone. They need to be be merged.The Talking Toaster (talk) 00:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Required
Talk:Budapest University of Jewish Studies

message: --Alfons2 (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

message: ==Untitled==
Not sure why these were in the article so I moved them to talk and placed under a level 1 heading to group them. RJFJR (talk) 22:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: faculty sections

message: Not sure why these were in the article so I moved them to talk and placed under a level 1 heading to group them. RJFJR (talk) 22:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The River Wild

message: I read she worked as a script doctor on this film 188.29.134.80 (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carrie Fisher as script doctor 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus that WP:SMALLDETAILS are sufficient to distinguish the titles without needing a parenthetical disambiguator. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: pages with content, such as :River Wild, are ineligible to be proposed titles in move requests unless they, too, are formally dispositioned. ":River Wild → " has been added to this request to meet that requirement. If this request is granted, then the  template may be applied. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 23:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In terms of the title, "The" is a sufficiently distinguishable part of the title to differentiate the topics, e.g. we have The Batman (film) that is not parenthetically disambiguated with other entries at Batman (film). SMALLDETAILS does not imply that they can't be confused with one another, it says that the way to disambiguate them is with hatnotes (as proposed), not parenthetical disambiguation. Parenthetical disambiguation is only used when two or more topics share the exact title and there is no way to resolve the conflict without wandering to far from WP:CRITERIA. Mdewman6 (talk) 16:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at WP:CRITERIA, we need precision: "The title unambiguously identifies the article's subject and distinguishes it from other subjects." As demonstrated above, without the release years (and associated media type), the two films are not clearly distinguished from each other. Furthermore, WP:CONCISE says, "The goal of concision is to balance brevity with sufficient information to identify the topic to a person familiar with the general subject area." I had said before that it is possible to be overly concise, and the quoted language shows that it is possible to be too brief, and I think that is likely here. Having a year added (with the associated media type) clearly distinguishes both from each other. It's a little extra text that is worth the tradeoff. We shouldn't be in a hurry to make article titles exceedingly short when confusion is clearly possible. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 August 2023
Talk:Blackwork

message: I have moved the reference to Wace to the References section and deleted the internal User link in keeping with Wikipedia's MOS.
I have also deleted this information:
:Also, Catherine's public wedding was in 1501 - and blackwork did not really take off in England til the 1530s. Her marriage to King Henry VIII was a private affair, so even if she had worn blackwork then, few would have seen it in the flesh. However, the legend still persists, although no evidence to support the theory has been found to date. A favourite motif on her clothing was the pomegranate which was used as a heraldic device in Granada, where Catherine lived as a child.
The first assertion is irrelevant; Catherine did marry Henry's older brother Prince Arthur in 1501, but everyone around the court would have been familiar with Catherine's wardrobe.
The second assertion, concerning the pomegranate, which has been in this article since I first ran across it, is, I think, an interpretaton from my own website http://www.blackworkarchives.com/bw_pome.html, and while what is said there is true, I have found no evidence of pomegranates ever being embroidered on any clothing of Catherine's.  I have been meaning to clarify this for some time. - PKM 21:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Soto Cano Air Base

message: Suggest there be an entry entitled "Soto Cano Airbase".  No one uses "Palmerola" anymore.
Actor Richard Gere visited the airbase in 1986.  It was said that he was scouting locations for an upcoming movie.
"Soto Cano is not a U.S. installation as some media report." What nonsense! It is an Honduran military installation being used for cover of a U.S. military installation. And all of what that entails.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:2306:2200:297F:E388:844E:DD19 (talk) 20:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am currently creating a separate article for the Comayagua International Airport to make it clear that the airport is not replacing the air base, the air base still exists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvaspad (talk • contribs) 19:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for the international airport
Talk:Black Swan-class sloop

message: The current armament doesn't seem to mention any depth charge or or anti-submarine equipment. Can someone familiar with this class please take a look at it and correct if needed ? -- Hirudo 21:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armament 

message: I have tried to mention it in Russian wiki only to be tormented with the source requests. Can anybody help Сергей Олегович (talk) 18:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Article here: Fuze Keeping Clock  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.247.9 (talk) 17:19, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuze Keeping Clock
Talk:Bear Mountain State Park

message: Did the events in the section on "The Lost Eight" ever actually happen? The citations given, as far as I can tell, are not 'real.'  Anyone know what the deal is? (Jack).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.113.189 (talk) 23:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's completely bogus.  Time magazine has searchable archives and fails to confirm this, plus the whole thing fails to google, plus I lived in Rockland County when this is supposed to have happened-- there is no way it wouldn't have been a huge deal locally.  It's garbage. -- Mwanner | Talk 01:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The section is a bit confusing and essentially has no references. I fully understand why the bit about the Palisades are included but possibly it could be removed for sake of simplicity. I removed bit about Anthony Wayne attacking Fort Montgomery.
Calamitybrook (talk) 17:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: :I removed the not directly relevant information about Palisades.
::This article has few or no citations or sources.
::::It's called a "start class" article of "mid importance" within the Hudson Valley category...........
:Yet it can be easily deemed of "major importance" within this group of articles. 
:"Bear Mountain State Park" had much to do historically with our current definition of the Hudson Valley due to New York City press coverage in 1920s through 1960s and its identification with Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt, as well as the Hudson Highlands coverage by "Hudson River School" painters of 1800s.
I'd say the appraiser is quite wrong and his or her criteria are obscure and incorrect.
Calamitybrook (talk) 00:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Middle Importance but Major

message: :I know that some significant and some insignificant parts of several films have been shot on location at Bear Mountain State Park, particularly "At First Sight", "To Wong Foo Thanks for Everything, Julie Newmar" and "The Juror". Would it be relevant to the article to point out these films and scenes in a separate section?
Apologies, I forgot to sign. 68.115.35.110 (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: In Films
Template talk:Public universities in Oklahoma

message: Shouldn't we include other public colleges in Oklahoma that may or may not yet be in Wikipedia yet? Some additions I got from a website include Cameron University, East Central University, Langston University, Northeastern State University, Northwestern Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma Panhandle State University, Rogers State University, Southeastern Oklahoma State University, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, University of Central Oklahoma, and University of Science & Arts of Oklahoma. Looks like a lot of these are already in Wikipedia, some with more info than others.--Nmajdan 21:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely.  I hadn't gotten around to putting them on that list yet.  I think I'll steal your list and do it now though :-) -- Ash Lux (talk | contribs) 17:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other colleges

message: I've redesigned the template. Hope you like it. If not, complain here. Smb1138 (talk) 04:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redesign
Talk:WNSY

message: This is an article about a radio station called WNSY - it isn't an article about the history of oldies radio stations in this part of Georgia, the feelings of the listeners, etc...   Some serious trimming is in order, but I no longer do edits. This is now a Spanish language radio station, and that should be the focus of the article.  69.37.38.104 (talk) 23:29, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research, off topic digression
Talk:0s BC

message: Why is there a question mark in the article? Is an encyclopedia article supposed to ask when Jesus was born. I don't think so. Hoof38 21:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The question mark indicates uncertainty regarding the year of his birth — it doesn't ask when he was born. — Joe Kress 19:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

text: The problem is that decades are popularly construed as going from the "0" year to the "9" year, like the 1960s (1960-1969).  By that standard, AD 0-9 would be a decade, but since there is no AD 0, that leaves 1-9 (nine years), and the same for the preceding "BC" decade. *Dan T.* 04:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The lead of the article says that "0s BC is usually considered the last decade of the 1st century BC", but is that really the case? I have never seen it used that way outside of Wikipedia and a quick google search does not seem to indicate that it is the case. The lead also seems to imply that using a 9 year period as this decade is something occasionally done outside of Wikipedia ("However, like the 0s, the number of years in the 0s BC is not always clearly defined"). I'm also not sure why there should be a discussion about the time of Jesus' birth in the lead.
I propose changing the lead by removing everything except "This article concerns the period 9 BC – 1 BC, the last nine years before the Anno Domini era". Andreaseksted (talk) 14:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usually considered the last decade? 

message: See WT:YEARS#0s for a discussion as to whether this article should be in :Category:Decades.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:38, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Decades]]
Talk:Social determinism

message: I think this article could use some expansion an the look of an expert. AKoan (talk) 11:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: I see this conflict between social/technological determinism as a false dichotomy, might they exert a bi-directional influence on each other? This seems most reasonable to me, and is supported by the broader definition of determinism itself. If there's a citable viewpoint similar to this, I encourage someone with more time and academic resources than I to add it. Thank you! --206.125.76.115 (talk) 19:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested direction for expansion