lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Event Viewer

message: Whats the relation between CLFS and Event Viewer/Windows Event Log? Is it a physical file system or a virtual one running on top of NTFS/FAT32? These should be made clear. --soum talk 18:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've no idea.  I've removed the section from the article.  It was unsourced and doesn't meet our NPOV requirements anyways...  -/- Warren 23:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CLFS 

message: I was looking for the name of the executable for event viewer and didn't find it in the article. 
It's mmc.exe in Windows XP. I think it would be worth mentioning?
195.217.138.194 (talk) 10:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the mmc is the microsoft management console, %SystemRoot%\system32\eventvwr.msc is the related file, which is opened in the mmc. but the mmc itself has little to do with the events.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.132.38.178 (talk) 15:07, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filename? 

message: The first XPath expression was wrong: It tested for an Event where: EventData has *any* TargetUserName data AND *any* data is "JUser". I also changed the other XPath expressions to weed them out from the same syntax (which may not have been wrong in the other cases, only confusing / redundant). Also the description of the others was confusing: As I read it, it said that if any field (node) is a string that contains "JUser", there would be a match. However, it matches only if the *whole* node's value is "JUser".
Lionel Elie Mamane (talk) 08:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  XPath expressions 

message: I think the article should be split. There is not yet a page for the windows eventlog service.
Richie765 (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article mixes Event Viewer and the Event Logging system 

message: Would be good if somebody with knowledge could extend the article and explain how Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 fit in this picture. Has anything changed. --SvenDK (talk) 08:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refrsh required 

message: It appears they may be using Weebly.com domains lately. I'm contacting them about shutting down this one I took a snapshot of https://web.archive.org/save/_embed/http://7699341058.weebly.com/
If someone calls you at home and instructs you to download .exe files from a page like this, please beware. I would not download them.
Strangely they ask to use the 'run' command to access that weird numerical subsite instead of just typing it into the browser bar. Not sure why, maybe to bypass safeties. I tested it in incognito a firewall and didn't run the .exe files so I hope that's safe.
Feel free to act like you're going along with the caller if you have some spare time though. The more time of theirs you waste, the less time they have to spend scamming the next potential victim who might be more trusting. Ranze (talk) 18:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Speaking of scammers
Talk:St. Jean Baptiste, Manitoba

message: There is a sign on the north end of town that does declare St. Jean as the Soup Pea capitol of Canada because of the Pea seed plant called Roy Legumex Inc. located in town.
:Sorry, didn't notice I deleted the whole sentence. The addition to the sentence was obviously nonsense, but your edit was legit. Cmr08 (talk) 01:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Malo, Manitoba

message: This is evidence that many river lots among the St. Malo Settlement survey had been owned by Métis individuals starting as early as the early 1870s around the time that Bishop Ritchot was negotiating for entry of Manitoba as a province of Canada. All of these early Métis owners of St. Malo Settlement river lots eventually were acquired by more serious settlers. The pioneer Louis Malo took possession of two river lots totalling 200 acres, likely lots 95 & 96 or 96 & 97, in 1877. Also, Joseph Bourgeois the elder took possession of lot 99 around 1880. Joseph Gladu also likely took possession of lot 94 in 1883. There may have been one other pioneer who took possession of a river lot between 1880 and 1884. All to say that the 1884 survey was a formal consolidation and formalization of previous informally established river lots. The formal 1884 survey established a benchmark to encourage legally sustainable growth on the way to parish status and municipal government.Cblambert (talk) 05:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying 1884 survey with prior evidence of river lot sales 

message: It is known that Louis Malo's log cabin was located 'a few steps' from, and either just south or just north of, the T-intersection formed by the common line between lots 89 & 90 and the west side of the main public road to St. Malo that was eventually built and that existed until between 1934 and 1940. It is also known that Louis Malo had acquired from Abraham Guay, about 1877, in exchange for 50 cords of wood, a 200-acre parcel of land consisting of either 1 or 2 river lots. One source identifies Mr. Malo's log cabin as being built on lot  91, which cannot by definition be 'a few steps' from the T-intersection described above. Another source identifies the log cabin being built on lot 89. Measuring 12 chains wide by 2 miles long, lot 90's area is equal to 192 acres. It therefore seems plausible that Mr. Malo had acquired lot 90 from Mr. Guay in exchange for two payments, a first payment for 50 cords of wood around 1877 followed by a final $100 payment in 1882.
Cblambert (talk) 01:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis Malo's log cabin - Where was it located?
Talk:Arctic Corsair

message: This section has neither a reference, nor any indication why these particular skippers are notable.Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:57, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skippers 

message: I would really like someone to add information about the person who designed the ship. I'm really interested in this topic. I would greatly appreciate if someone added information about what I have requested to learn about into this article as I believe that would be very valuable. Esmé Aberdova (talk) 05:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who designed the ship?!
Talk:Volleyball rules

message: The rules section can be divided up into articles and wiki-linked from this page. All rule articles should have the Category :Category:Volleyball rules in the article so the articles can be classified together.
Each new article should also have the template above and get assessed appropriately. BrianZ(talk) 00:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:VBALL|WikiProject Volleyball]] 

message: Please add information about when and how the rules were changed and revised.
Which revision is described in the article ?
--Xerces8 (talk) 08:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rules versions
Talk:Shoal Lakes (Manitoba)

message: There are numerous other articles that contain links which clearly pertain only to particular instances of "Shoal Lake", and which should be able to indicate which one they are referring to rather than linking to this general page. For example, there is the Rural Municipality of Shoal Lake, the article for Oakburn, Manitoba, and List of R postal codes of Canada. (As well as a few others that have not developed yet.) Cursed Chords (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be split up
Talk:Hasholme Logboat

message: We SO need pictures to understand this boat.  It is described in the article as log-shaped, but the photo I have seen of it is not, its boat shaped. http://www.hullcc.gov.uk/museumcollections/collections/storydetail.php?irn=507&master=514 . Some comparisons with other known boats would help give perspective of the significance of this boat.  Surely this is an unusually BIG log boat? How does it compare in size and function with sewn-plank boats?
IceDragon64 (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not very easy to get a good photo because of its location and lighting condition. Keith D (talk) 00:39, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pix 

message: Great info box.  More pages should have info boxes!
IceDragon64 (talk) 20:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box 
Talk:Gray marmot

message: For my class assignment I plan to use the following sources to add information to this article under the headings of Description, Distribution and Habitat, Biology/Behavior including sociality, burrows and reproduction and Taxonomy. Earth sunshine goddess (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Information and Edit Article
Talk:Wabowden

message: I removed the area from the infobox, it was 87,817.92 sq km (a little over the size of South Carolina).  I don't know if the number was supposed to be square metres, or if it was just a typo, but I have been to Wabowden, and I don't remember it being that large.  I will see if I can get the right number.--Kelapstick 16:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the area and the population being given were for the entire unorganized portion of Division No. 22, Manitoba, not for Wabowden alone. Bearcat (talk) 17:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: move.
Suggest to move article to Wabowden, only thing close to a similar name is Wabowden Water Aerodrome.  The town's namesake is W. A. Bowden, so that shouldn't be a problem.--kelapstick (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wabowden, or secondary uses related to Wabowden, were the only results of the google search I did.  So, as per WP:CANSTYLE and WP:PRIMARYUSAGE, I support the move. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: Most other smaller places are named in this fashion. Backspace (talk) 03:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See the discussion above.  According to Canadian naming conventions population is not relevant if the name of the city/town is the primary use of the name.  See also Flin Flon, Leaf Rapids etc.--kelapstick (talk) 17:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be moved to Wabowden, Manitoba
Talk:Hush Puppies

message: US?  China?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.25.54 (talk) 01:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Where are Hushpuppies made?]]

message: The article states: "Wolverine markets and completely licenses the Hush Puppies name for footwear in over 120 countries throughout the world."   Licenses for what exactly and to who?   Do they license other foot ware manufacturers to apply Hush Puppies branding to white label products?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FreeFlow99 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licencing 

message: Where did the name come from? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 07:52, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Vector W8

message: Any source to this? or is it like the Koenigsegg "240mph on the highway" myth? Mike.BRZ (talk) 04:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bonneville test

message: numerous reputable sources tie this car exclusively to its un-reliability. Is there a reason none of this is mentioned in the article? 108.172.114.141 (talk) 21:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree 100%. I read the original Road & Track magazine test of the car in the early 90's. This car was en engineering masterpiece. Even with the pushrod engine which I distinctly remember was an Oldsmobile, not a Chevrolet as the wiki article states. I've tried to confirm that but most internet articles call it a "GM Engine" (that could mean anything, Buick, Chev, Olds etc). Anyway. I found this to back up the reliability claim from the auto editors of consumer guide. http://auto.howstuffworks.com/1978-1998-vector4.htm  "Nobody could deny the strength of the Vector design. Nearly everyone who has had the chance to drive one described it as over-designed. The military-grade specifications were well beyond those of other cars on the road. Where more affluent automakers could afford to crash test a number of cars until a design is found to be sufficiently strong. Vector used one car for front and rear crash testing. The Ralph Maloof-designed front and rear booms worked perfectly Had the electrical equipment not been disconnected for the test, the car could have been driven away from the crashes." 1.178.167.118 (talk) 04:30, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliability? 

message: I remember reading in Road & track magazine all those years ago that the Vector had an Oldsmobile 350 cuber, not a Chevrolet. I wish I had not of thrown out those old issues, but alas they are gone so I can't go back to those old magazines and verify that. 1.178.99.23 (talk) 04:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine

message: This statement is just promotional and nothing more. While viewing the forum from which this statement was taken from, it was seen that the critique, the owner of a W8 and a former employee of Vector criticised every other car by saying "A Ferrari needs a $7,500 service every 7,500 miles" and other statements like that. This is unjustifiable when he himself didn't drove the W8 for even 1,000 miles. It is obvious that the car would need $2,000 for servicing and maintenance when it is not driven much and mostly kept at idle like the owner claimed himself. U1Quattro (talk) 07:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sentence "Everything on the W8 was designed to last the life of the owner" 

message: The emblem on the side of the car says "Vector W-8" with a dash. Should the page title match?
Unknowntouncertain (talk) 20:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember it being called "Vector W-8" by the automotive press or the company. U1 quattro TALK 09:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be W-8?
Talk:Vector W2

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but the car in the movie Moonwalker appears to be a Vector W2 or maybe the W8?  Although the W8 wasn't out yet.  It resembles a Lamborghini Countach, but I think its a Vector.  Does anyone know for sure? -- Suso 21:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Moonwalker page, it was a 1970 Lancia Stratos, which, along with the DeTomaso Pantera, does bear a slight resemblance to the Vector W2.  However, it should be noted that the constraints on the technology of the period dictated that most mid-engine two-seat coupes with a similar chassis configuration would share certain characteristics, such as an enlarged aft engine bay, which results in that sort of "space car" shape they all tend to also share.  It's a great question, though.  P.F. Bruns (talk) 05:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moonwalker video appearance 
Wikipedia talk:An uncivil environment is a poor environment

message: Diff --I liked that so much I thought I'll would be bold. I refactored slightly to decontextualize for an essay.--Cerejota 00:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale

message: *User:Cirt/Gutting
I've created an essay on Gutting an article during deletion discussion.
You may find it interesting reading at: User:Cirt/Gutting.
Cheers,
— Cirt (talk) 18:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:   "Gutting" an article during deletion discussion
Talk:Wildwood Park, Winnipeg

message: How does the map make any sense? It just shows the whole of Winnipeg and some surrounding area. Michael Hardy (talk) 05:28, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I know, and I agree. I'm just not into mapping. I concentrate on article text and ensure that there's an infobox and possibly a photo. Other metro areas have better maps to use, like Toronto, Vancouver and NYC. Maybe one day someone will do similar for Winnipeg. But it most likely wont be me. I just don't have the skills to do it. Jimj wpg (talk) 10:41, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map
Talk:B Engineering Edonis

message: Whoever put together the numbers in this article is an idiot.  "480 bhp/ton" and yet states 671BHP and 1500kg.  That makes 447BHP/ton.  Also states 181BHP/litre.  No, with the stated 3.76l engine that's 178BHP/litre.  If the numbers don't even add up, what sort of credibility does this source have? 62.49.12.239 (talk) 22:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hui Minorities' War

message: The page that this page redirects to redirects back to here: in other words, this is a circular redirect.  It seems that neither pages truly exist with any information, which is a shame because I rather needed it today.  I propose that someone either writes an article for this (not volunteering myself, I'm not a writer) or we delete it, since this is incredibly frustrating to run into while on the hunt for info.
Hunnatti 00:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Baltic knighthoods

message: The text is close to http://www.baltische-ritterschaften.de/Englische%20Version/index-engl.htm The text was even proposed to be speedy deleted as G12. I think the text is modified enough for the legal requirements of the copyright law, but additional copyediting and expansion are welcome Alex Bakharev 12:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the sections which were simple copy/pastes of copyrighted material and left the opening section. CIreland 12:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:Zhoda

message: All of the evidence that I can find points to this community being located in the extreme southern portion of the Rural Municipality of La Broquerie. What evidence is there that the community extends southwards into the Rural Municipality of Stuartburn? This would require it to extend south across Morozenko Road, in other words. Is there a local person who can verify the location of the church and community center? Backspace (talk) 18:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Zhoda existed long before #12 Hwy & its post office,community hall, churhes, schools were in the R.M.of Stuartburn.. Dover shool was in the western part settled by Norwegians hence the Dover school....Moens, Rasumusens,etc., while 2 other schools were situated East of Dover. R.M. of La Broquerie had absolutly nothing to do with original Zhoda. The Farena's were post office masters in the early 50's & long before #12.....Martin Shmigelsky. 2001:569:FC67:C300:3509:7AEC:1BFD:497 (talk) 06:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it really also in Stuartburn?
Talk:Stuartburn, Manitoba

message: I changed the category of this article from rural municipality to settlement. There is also a rural municipality that goes by the same name. However, since this particular article is not specifically about the RM, but about the small community that lies within it, I decided to change the category. I do not believe that we have a separate article on the RM yet. Backspace (talk) 03:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent category change
Talk:American Labor Party

message: What about the newly-formed American Labor Party? It was formed just this month, June of 2007. They have a website here: http://www.americanlaborparty.com/. I think we should either make a new page or move this article to another one in order that there can be a page for the current American Labor Party. ErikB18:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Love Don't Let Me Go (Walking Away)

message: I listened to this song by the Weather Girls and didn't hear anything that was used in Love Don't Let Me Go. The statement was unsourced, and I couldn't find anything about it on Google. Therfore, I removed the statement (but wasn't logged in...)CuttlefishTech 01:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Samples "It's Raining Men?"
Talk:Knight's Bridge

message: Alright, so since we decided deletion was not the way to go on this article, I thought we'd start off a discussion on the multiple ideas proposed.--Yaksar (let's chat) 21:35, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to me that as the road was named after the original bridge, that's more likely the better topic for the article. Any Oregon folks around here have access to the sources mentioned in the AfD? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was tired of the AfD and the relentless badgering by the Inclusionists who didn't actually do any work to improve the article, so I haven't looked at the debate after I withdrew the nom. That said, I have sources, from actual books--3 or 4 or so, which I will get around to adding to the article eventually. Sorry if I sound bitter, I've got other stuff going on in my life right now, and defending what seemed to be a rountine deletion nomination on an article about a minor formerly notable bridge was not high on my priority list. Valfontis (talk) 23:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing else was discussed after you withdrew it, the discussion was simply closed. Your proposals to merge or move the content are still totally valid, and can be discussed.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

text:  P.S. In the meantime, until I get a chance to flesh it out, adding the information that can be gleaned from the snippet view of the books I've consulted would be a good start, since the article still doesn't say anything about why the bridge is notable. It would sure be nice if some of the "keep" voters could do that work. (post ec comment) I think there is enough to keep the article here, once it is expanded. Valfontis (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving on from the AfD
Talk:Wonder Bar

message: A request has been made to determine if this article meets the B-class criteria for WP:FILMS. Looking over the article, at this time it does not meet the criteria. The article will require further expansion as well as additional sourcing to advance to B-class. For what needs to be done to reach the next assessment level click on the "[show]" button in the above film banner and follow the instructions in "Start to B-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films". Once the article meets the criteria, please relist your request for reassessment and I'll be happy to take a look. If you have any questions or need help with anything let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 19:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article still doesn't meet the criteria. Coverage is limited to "plot" and "controversy", and is largely unsourced. PC78 (talk) 07:04, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your re-evaluation. I'll work on citations when I get a chance. Can you perhaps give a little more detail in what you would like to see improved in terms of coverage? I'm perhaps feeling that there isn't too much information out there on the film, as it is a minor blip in the overall history of film, but the quality of the article isn't meant to be dependent on the amount of information on the topic but on how thoroughly the topic is covered. Do you have any suggestions for starting points that I should look into a bit more? Thanks for your time and input! Sevey13 (talk) 07:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How would you distinguish "the amount of information on the topic" from "how thoroughly the topic is covered"? That's just two different ways of saying the same thing. You could expand the plot summary a bit (but not too much), add a cast list, find some sources to support the "Music and controversy" section. Have you tried searching for information about the film? I've managed to find  and , both of them reliable sources with some good, usable content. Best of luck in improving the article. :) PC78 (talk) 00:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:FILMS B class assessment review
Talk:Manitoba Bisons

message: * Support merging the two articles. They discuss the same thing, and Manitoba Bisons is the form consistent with other CIS team articles. Chomage 18:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Bison Sports]] 
Talk:Franco-Manitoban

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it contains only the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 03:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment