Talk:P-90

message: The Kinman P-90x supposedly has a perfect sound according to the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.30.108.169 (talk) 11:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Proceeding with removal of section from article. While there's kernels of truth here, it is strongly tangled with adcopy and is far from encyclopedic. Cassie is Asleep (talk) 07:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Kinman section written like an advertisement

message: I believe that "soapbar" is a nickname for P-90 pickup in its specific form-factor. Wouldn't we rather have one fuller article with varities or form-factors description section rather than 2 distinct articles that have 90% in common? --GreyCat 11:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Do you think the P-100 pickup should be mentioned? It looks identical to the P-90, but it's stacked so the hum cancels, and doesn't exactly sound the same. --SeanMcB 9:15, 25 September, 2006 (UTC)
Well, if there wouldn't be a separate P-100 article, just make P-100 a redirect and add information to this one. I guess it would be right. --GreyCat 18:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: P-100

message: "By the 1970s, single-coil pickups, mini-humbucking pickups and uncovered humbucking pickups began replacing the P-90 pickups on Gibson's budget and lower-end models."
--Roivas (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: True. Maikel (talk) 18:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Passage 

message: Do we really need to have a giant section of wanking material for 13 year old Rolling Stone readers who happen to own a Squier starter set covered in dust in the corner of their room? "The guitar Eric Clapton keeps in his bathroom to fiddle with while he takes a dump is equipped with P-90s and he's a famous musician, so he's a notable user!" The damn list is like a third of the article. 76.16.85.100 (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia really DOES love its lists doesn’t it. There honestly should be a generally accepted definition of the word 'notable'. And for however added 'James Faulkinbury' (who according to google seems to exist ONLY on every P-90 list ever): 'notable user' doesn’t translate to 'that one guy I ran into at the mall one time carrying a guitar'. But anyway, instead of just ranting about lists like these like most people do, I'm gonna actually do something about it and try to cut into it a bit. Not using my fast P-90 knowledge (sarcasm) but let's start with some common sense: Player or band doesn’t even have a wikipedia article? Right.. real notable users. 'Uses P-90 occasionally'? Those are going. Editor couldn’t be bothered with a sentence longer than two words? bye-bye. This should cut it down a bit. I ask anyone with any real knowledge about P-90 sound to select a few (lets say ten) that can stay.OmikronWeapon (talk) 07:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable users section... 

message: the third 'source' reference at the bottom of the page (a university web link) is dead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.62.51 (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link 

message: Ok, so I saw in the infobox, under "Type", that this is a "Passive single-coil" pickup. So I went, what is a passive pickup, and clicked on the link (to Pickup (music technology)#Active and passive pick-ups). Apparently the section name was changed to Pickup (music technology)#Active and passive pickups. So I tried to change the link to that, but when I tried to edit it...it only had a link to "single-coil". I added a link anyway but when I previewed it, it just had passive twice, on linking to the incorrect title and another to the correct one. I can't figure out where this link is coming from. ??? Eman235/talk 03:12, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on P-90. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313175500/http://online.physics.uiuc.edu:80/courses/phys498pom/ to http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/courses/phys498pom/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on P-90. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701180816/http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/courses/phys498pom/498emi_guitar_pickup_results.html to http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/courses/phys498pom/498emi_guitar_pickup_results.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/courses/phys498pom/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified