Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tanzania

message: An RfC on moving the year from the end to the start of article titles (e.g. South African general election, 2019 to 2019 South African general election) has been reopened for further comment, including on whether a bot could be used move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Proposed change to election/referendum naming format. Cheers, Number 57 15:41, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on election/referendum naming format

message: The usage of  and  are under discussion, see respectively Talk:Handeni Town Council and Talk:Masasi Town Council
-- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Masasi]] and [[Handeni]]

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I noticed a lot of poor quality, grainy, highly edited, and unnecessary images in the Dar es Salaam article and cleared it up. I would suggest other users of this project to patrol the Dar es Salaam page as well. AssadFin (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images of Dar es Salaam 

message: Hello,Please note that Serengeti, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! 

message: The article, Lumumba Secondary School, is at AfD, and editors are invited to respond. 
In addition, if you have any images of the school, please respond to the image tag Talk:Lumumba Secondary School. 
Many thanks! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image request for Lumumba Secondary School 

message: An editor changed the person's name citing legal reasons.  In the process of that and other edits, a lot of formatting was messed up, so I reverted it.
Someone with knowledge of the subject needs to see what, if any, information is actually out of date and fix it.  WP:BLP applies.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bonnah Kaluwa]] needs attention 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :White Tanzanians. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 24#White Tanzanians until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Place Clichy (talk) 10:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "White Tanzanians" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: March is the third and final month of Women in Red's focus on biographies of African women in our Women in Africa contest. Up to now, around a hundred articles have been contributed but with your collaboration, we hope to have many more.--Ipigott (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Women in Africa contest

message: Tanganyika has become a disambiguation page and its incoming links need to be diverted to appropriate articles.  Most are for Tanganyika (territory) (British, 1916–1961) or Tanganyika (1961–1964) or the current Tanzania Mainland, but some refer to the German era (18??–1916) or earlier, for which there is no good target.  Please add any helpful suggestions to Talk:Tanganyika#Post-move repairs.  Certes (talk) 16:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tanganyika 

message: Hi All, I wanted to let you know that I published Jassini an article about a small village that straddles Tanzania and Kenya. I wrote the article over 6 years ago and decided it was better as a stub in the article namespace than an unseen article under my user space. The sources that taught me about the village were relatively old so there may be some updates, especially to the comments that the village contains no electricity, running water, or shops. In some initial searching, I was unable to determine that those had changed, but google imagery appears to show that the village may have road connections now. Ryan Vesey 02:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jassini]] 

message: A split proposal is in progress for Serengeti to Draft:Great Migration (Serengeti).  Please discuss in at Talk:Serengeti#Split with your thoughts.  Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal for Great Migration (Serengeti) 

message: If this wikiproject is still active reply to me because I think it is very very inactive. TigerScientist Chat > contribs 17:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Inactive TigerScientist Chat > contribs 22:50, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  ??? Jumping to conclusions, much? Hello! —beetricks ~ 💬 · ✉️ 10:03, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it took 19 days for someone to reply to this, my draft I requested to have a split from Serengeti (note that the draft is supported by this wikiproject) and no one responds to my messages. I think it is pretty inactive. TigerScientist Chat > contribs 17:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Welp, that sucks. Anyway, I'll go to your draft and review it. —beetricks ~ 💬 · ✉️ 18:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  well no thats not the problem. The draft is ready but turns I need to have consensus for a split at Serengeti. No one has responded IN LITERAL 3 months. TigerScientist Chat > contribs 16:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad 

message: Hosted by the Wikimedia Community User Group Uganda, the first ever virtual Wiki Indaba conference is taking place online from the 5th to the 7th of November 2021 under the theme Rethink + Reset : Visions of the future. 
Wiki Indaba 2021 is a unique opportunity to come together to build the capacity of African Wikimedians both within the continent and the diaspora to foster the growth of the coverage and our involvement in Wikimedia projects. 
The call for submissions is open, please submit your session proposal either as a presentation, panel discussion, lightning talk, or workshop before September 24th 2021.
Most importantly, we would like to have you at the conference, please register here to get your free ticket and spread the word to your community members.
Looking forward to seeing you and hearing you speak at the conference.
Geoffrey Kateregga (talk) 23:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Indaba 2021 is here! 

message: I have nominated Mozambican War of Independence for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 14:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR for Mozambican War of Independence 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: A discussion about the article Queen of Tanganyika is open at Talk:Queen of Ghana#Requested move 7 June 2022. Please comment there to generate a clear consensus. Thanks.  Peter Ormond 💬 08:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Queen of Tanganyika]] 

message: Hello, I was wondering if anyone is very active? I have been doing some updating to the to-do pages, and would like to do some more updates to the project.
If anyone is active it would be great to work with another. I am not very experienced. But would at least like to get some things updated with some ideas of projects or cleanups available to anyone who passes by. Even if they are not active participants of the project. BevoLJ (talk) 09:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doing some updating. 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: Please see: Talk:Maasai people#Shúkà. The gist is that we have a section on clothing at that article, and a section on the same cloting/material at Tartan#Maasai shúkà, so we probably either need to do some merging or even have a separate article at Shúkà. I'm not sure exactly which is preferable.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  12:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maasai ''shúkà'' 

message: Hello WikiProject Tanzania: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 13:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon 

message: Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries. 
Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and proceed to further rounds. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
Tanzania is listed as a least-developed country for the purposes of this contest, which means Tanzania-related submissions to the contest will get a multiplier in points. I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content! 
Append your name to the DCWC signup page today! 
Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 14:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:DCWC|Developing Countries WikiContest]]