lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Urbian

message: There is also a Hittite word, urai, meaning "large". Alex (talk) 05:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hittite Urai, "large"

message: Have added enough academic references to establish notability. The primary author of the theory is a senior PHD professor (in this field) at the University of Bucharest, and he's written about it in a number of peer-reviewed publications. I take no position on the merits of his hteory, but his work is credible and cited by others in his field. http://scholar.google.ro/citations?user=wLB_bLYAAAAJ&hl=en
:I got a few reservations about judging the material too hastily. First of all, it is a stub, so naturally it does not look too good. How would you feel if it looked good? Second, I've seen quite a few quick delete and notability disputes on here. Usually the non-notability partisans are led by a single aggressor, who, on being looked into (on the Internet of course) turns out to be not only ignorant of the subject but to have some sort of axe to grind. There was one fellow who led a site professedly dedicated to cleaning all BS off the Internet. How he railed against WP! Suddenly he is not only on WP, but is an administrator. How he got that I am not sure, probably by dumping stubs on it, as they rewarded numbers of articles with administratorships at one point. Any fool could be an administrator, and that is what he was. It turns out he was a real estate person running for office in Great Britain, using his Internet activities to garner fame as the champion of public honesty versus Internet lies. Sounds like the devil in Massachusetts convicting the innocent by accusations of guilt. The devil accuses someone else of being the devil. (the devil is still here, by the way). I first encountered him one morning as he kept interrupting my work on WP by changing the topic I was working on so that I could not save it. He laid in wait for me, you see. This man and a crony bedevilled and got deleted a perfectly good article that was not of general interest. There is at least one organization, you know, dedicated to destroying WP. I found my name on it at one point, as an editor that should be attacked. Anyway, my assessment of this topic is as follows. This is a sort of avante-garde topic, which seeks to go further on the fringes of the solid. It is so specialized that no one gives a rat's tail about it. It needs someone to take charge and make it relevant. Are we deleting avant-garde articles? Is it notable? If you are an Indo-Europeanist you might be interested in the theory. If not, not, as you probably would not understand it, unless someone made it clearer.Botteville (talk) 01:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and Notability
Talk:PS2

message: The disambiguation page is now located at PS2 (disambiguation). The reason for the change is that many articles just link to "PS2" and are related to the PlayStation 2. A note has been put on the PlayStation 2 page saying where the disambiguation is now located for those wanting other pages with the same name. -- Thorpe talk 15:06, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emre Belezoğlu

message: Should not be merged but deleted entirely. The tone of the entire article is not appropriate for wikipedia, it sounds like a fanzine. It also does not contain any material worthy of being placed into the other Emre Belozoglu article. Mark272 15:15, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. What's the point of merging this article? None. At least Emre Belozoglu has some sense in it. APclark 17:34, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Scottish Wikipedians' notice board/to do

message: Many thanks to User:Wangi for providing Oor Wullie image (and so quickly too).
Thanks too for removing two items of old business (incl. Oor Wullie), but can I just request that Users archive these old items on the relevant sub page(s):
*Wikipedia:Scottish Wikipedians' notice board/Completed requests and finished projects
*Wikipedia:Scottish Wikipedians' notice board/New articles
I don't suppose that this is all that critical, but it would be nice to have a record of the items completed.--Mais oui! 12:53, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving old business
Talk:Beach Ultimate

message: I think we should merge any extra info in this article into Ultimate (sport).  The majority of the beach ultimate article is just info repeated from Ultimate (sport), the only differences are the pitch size and the fact that it's on a beach.  Indoor ultimate is arguably more common than beach ultimate and I don't think that should have it's own article either.Ends Of Invention 15:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with main Ultimate article 

message: Was it all copyright violation? A lot of stuff got removed. --Liface 00:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it was all copyright violation. Read the merge discussion. This article is blatantly an advertisement. (Note also the double placement of their weblink.)—WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• 00:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content
Talk:Maria Reynolds

message: Especially since the "Hamilton" musical show Hamilton related pages have been subject to all sorts of vandalism and have consequently been put under semi-protection so that entries by non autoconfirmed users must be subject to revision before going online. This is true for the pages related to Alexander Hamilton himself, as well as related characters Eliza Schuyler Hamilton, Angelica Schuyler Church, Philip Hamilton, Aaron Burr, MARIA REYNOLDS, etc. Please respect the decision made by the administrators some time ago to ensure better patrolling of pages that are particularly subject to vandalism. Isananni (talk) 12:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been no disruption since protection expired. If significant disruption starts up again please make a protection request at WP:RFPP. --NeilN talk to me 13:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you NeiN, that's the information I needed. Have a nice day. Isananni (talk) 14:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection 

message: In the long quote from the letter, there were numerous annoying '[sic]' inserts.  Spelling and punctuation had not been standardized in those days; even legal documents like wills and deeds that I have seen from that period and later show similar spelling differences in them.  A note in the introductory paragraph that I have put in would be more appropriate for this 18th Century letter. Shocking Blue (talk) 07:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the edit. I think it makes for a better reading experience, if reading such an appaling example of semianalphabetism can ever be good, let alone the despicable circumstances of that letter. Thanks again. Isananni (talk) 08:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Glad it helped.  I went to this article due to Hamilton (naturally) and saw what was written.  I researched my family history extensively in the 1970's and 1980's and had to try to decipher this kind of writing many times, though it usually wasn't this bad! BTW, I hadn't heard this fun word "semianalphabetism" before. Shocking Blue (talk) 13:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [sic] notations 

message: "Susan was married several times, but never happily. However, she birthed two daughters: Josepha Philips, whom Maria raised from age 12, after Susan's death at age 39."Susan was married to john adams
Okay, I'll bite. Who was the other daughter of Susan?  History Lunatic (talk) 00:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: WHO IN THE WORLD POST SOMETHING BUT DOESN’T SAY ANYTHING 106.69.234.112 (talk) 09:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Granddaughters
Talk:Infinity Gems

message: I see that a "split section" tag was added for the MCU version of the Infinity Stones, but no discussion was started. I am personally not seeing a need to split these into a separate article. 24.196.89.218 (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This section does not have to be split off. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

text: While there is some coverage of them that could indicate notability, there isn't really any interesting or in depth commentary so to say, so I'd agree that it would be rather pointless to split it.★Trekker (talk) 18:45, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split for MCU 

message: Should WandaVison be mentioned? Because I saw the Mind Stone make an appearance... Visokor (talk) 10:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WandaVision involvement? 

message: Talking Thanos voice 2600:1700:5510:3F60:886D:7325:1886:1ADD (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the red gem represent in the marvels 

message: The continuity stone is a main universe cannon infinity stone, why do people keep removing it? KashmirInt (talk) 23:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity stone
Talk:Lyman series

message: ----
Why are there two different pages for Lyman-alpha_line and Lyman series?  They seem to be repetitive.  User:alejandr013
This article has a lot of legacy units. Can anyone ensure that this article works in SI units? Bobblewik 16:08, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I just removed the figure because it had the wrong wavelength for Lyman beta.  It should be 1025.72 Angstroms, not 1025.18.  Source:  http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Handbook/Tables/hydrogentable2.htm  Also, Parenti, Vial, Lemaire, 2005, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 443, 679.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.142.24.64 (talk) 15:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Just uploaded a new version, then discover that I fail at rounding. Give me a mo' to fix it again. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 21:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 21:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wavelengths 

message: It seems to me the number 12430 is calculated wrong.
Googling "h * c / electron charge / angstrom" without the quotes (as well as manual calculation) gives me 12398.4
Can anyone explain this?
2001:610:1908:8000:C9A6:DCFD:5E11:D44E (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well since it calculates the values from the table wrong, i'm assuming nobody ever bothered to check it. I'm updating the value 2001:610:1908:8000:C9A6:DCFD:5E11:D44E (talk) 22:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  12398.4 as a value for hc in eV*Angstroms, is indeed correct. Thanks for noticing. SBHarris 02:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong numbers
Category talk:Wikipedian medical students

message: I wonder if you would consider supporting Emergency department atWikipedia:Article Improvement Drive. This department is where we all go if we are very ill, and I feel it needs a boost if it is ever to get featured article status. I would greatly appreciate if you were able to offer support on this.--File Éireann 15:50, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emergency department]]
Talk:United Nations Security Council Resolution 1564

message: wait please i would like time to work on it to make it an article Briaboru 16:12, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  speedy deletion 

message: Does this resolution implies an arms embargo to Sudan ? Or is it a later resolution ? I could not find a reference to weapons in the 5 pages of the resolution. If not, do you know which resolution sets the current arms embargo ? Thanks! Nicolas1981 (talk) 08:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arms embargo ?
Talk:Thespesia populnea

message: Authority for Suriya:
Carter, Rev. Charles, A Sinhalese-English Dictionary, Colombo, Baptist Missionary Society, 1924.
Agroforestry Database
http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sea/Products/AFDbases/AF/asp/SpeciesInfo.asp?SpID=1643
Authority for Suriya-mal movement.
Leslie Goonewardena, A Short History of the Lanka Sama Samaja Party.
http://www.whatnextjournal.co.uk/Pages/History/Lssp.html
220.247.221.230 16:20, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ulm

message: I think that we need an "Ulm in popular culture" segment.
It has at least 2 things:
The Monty Python sketch and the joke among Europa Universalis 4 players that Ulm,as a free city is the strongest nation,due to an comic/after action report called Flagland  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaptaşHero (talk • contribs) 18:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I wholeheartedly support this! Nate Hooper (talk) 12:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

text: I completely agree as well, I have embraced the meme on eu4 to the point that I have actually developed a few strategies to play as Ulm. A Basil Biscuit (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ulm in popular culture 

message: I have been trying to find out more about the separation of Neu-Ulm from Ulm and the border changes between Württemberg and Bavaria. According to the German wiki article:  "The Treaty of Compiègne of 24 April 1810, which came under significant pressure Napoleon, was agreed between the kingdoms of Bavaria and Württemberg an area exchange. A treaty between Bavaria and Württemberg of May 1810 regulated the details. Bavaria resigned its sovereignty over the city of Ulm and parts of Upper Swabia to Württemberg. The demarcation took place in the middle of the Danube. The island and the possessions of Ulm remained on the right bank of the Danube near Bavaria."  but there are no references. I can't find anything about this treaty. Maybe I need to work on my German and dig something up. Pelirojopajaro (talk) 08:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neu-Ulm Separation 
Talk:Fu Jen Catholic University

message: The material removed from the History section appears to be a direct copy from the contents of an existing website . --BenjaminTsai 07:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue with History 

message: Guys I made an edit and one of the paragraphs reads as follows;
The name of the university, adapted into English as "Fu Jen," is Chinese meaning "a gentleman who makes friends through literature and friendship enable benevolence."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x68LKulwIIg&feature=player_embedded. There is a paucity of sources which would explain the use of the word Jen instead of the more obvious Ren; however, it is conceivable that those trusted with deciding on the name were positioned to use a word that upon being spoken by English speakers would be more likely to rhyme with, and thus resemble, the Chinese name.
Ok, yes I wish I had more sources on this but it is necessary (and I know the rules of Wikipedia). Please if you can back me up that'd be great.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.151.23.239 (talk) 22:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important clarification 
Talk:Lewis (The Simpsons)

message: They merged Wendell. Do you think we should merge this one too? --APclark 16:29, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I REALLY REALLY REALLY need to know about this: is Lewis Carl's son? SOURCE please? ☺ APclark Be nice not nasty 18:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should be deleted. Lewis is a relatively obscure character on the Simpsons, so he definitely doesn't need his own article. A paragraph about him in the characters article is enough. Edrigu 20:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Compensated demand curve

message: So, an article exists for Hicksian_demand that is in fact more informative than this.  Compensated demand and Hicksian demand are the same thing.  I don't know how to do this, but the articles should really be combined. Coleca 02:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hicksian_demand
Talk:Carbon dioxide (data page)

message: I have a question regarding "explosive decomposition of elastomers", in a pipeline condition where both CO2 and Natural Gas are common is there a potential problem if urethane is used on a line cleaning device?  The preceived concern is depressurization of the urethane in atmospheric conditions causing a decomposition of the Elastomers.  Any comments? Mr. Kit Dual--98.175.228.222 (talk) 17:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

message: terms of use 95.125.105.237 (talk) 23:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  carbon dioxide us not in air for the terms of H'2,O water 💦 tread.
Talk:Geoffroi de Charney

message: Seriously? Did someone just dig up the most overly verbose paragraph from some long-forgotten history book (it seems to be a quote of a quote) and just copy it word-for-word? Entirely out of context and barely even relevant to the subject. In dire need of cleaning up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.71.222 (talk) 12:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Criticism by one who obviously hides behind a numbered IP, specially created, it seems, to assert only criticism on the different articles that he or she comments on, is a cheap shot and does not command any respect.  It is also the primary reason that Wikipedia is continually losing potentially good editors. To offer or make specific Wikipedia:Assume good faith improvements is the proper Wikipedian way.  Have, however re-worded some paragraphs and will continue, along with other good faith editors to improve the article. Mugginsx (talk) 15:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed some information that is beyond Wikipedia:Scope and is well covered in other Templar articles. Mugginsx (talk) 15:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The Death section is totally subtle what it says and ungrammatical and unencyclopedic. Please make the section unequivocal, WP:NPOV. The Supermind (talk) 15:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion based writing in Death section 

message: No, no, no. “Guy” absolutely does not and never did mean “boy” in French.  That’s English you are thinking of. Killing it with fire. Elinruby (talk) 08:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egregious translation error 

message: It was much shorter then, and definitely a translation. It isn’t tagged as such, though, which I missed at the time. Given the word use of the added text, it is almost certainly pasted from somewhere, as it isn’t remotely modern in its phrasing, and still has a footnote number  from the text that quotes the original account. Given the likely age of the original account WP:COPYVIO *may* not apply, but I suspect proper attribution is lacking. Putting this in the hands of  for her consideration Elinruby (talk) 02:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry it's not at all clear what I am supposed to be looking at or what the source of the text is that you think got added or when it got added. The citation oddity 86 to 127[3] was added back in 2011   so that doesn't clear things up either. In other words, if you could be a lot more specific about which text you think might be copyvio I will check but as it stands I have no idea what you want me to examine. Thanks,— Diannaa (talk) 14:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just jumping on here, much later (during a GoCE blitz) to guess that the copyvio might be the long source listed in the "death" section (for some reason, the quotation marks have disappeared). I'm just going to leave it there for you to see if it's copyvio... Epikourios Alitheia talk 19:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?: Changed since the last time I looked?
Talk:Origins of Paleoindians

message: I have added a  list so that other editors can help start getting this article in shape. — Ambush Commander(Talk) 16:59, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo list

message: I don't feel these should be merged, although there is some overlap. This article is a little more in-depth and would make the Models article way too long. It could theoretically go in the Paleo-Indians article, although that's more about their lifestyle, culture and immediate descendants than their origins. Twalls (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with Models of Migration?

message: It seems odd that it isn't named in the body. 200.90.229.244 (talk) 17:39, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Monte Verde

message: "Beringia and the Global Dispersal of Modern Humans," published in the April issue of the journal Evolutionary Anthropology. The authors examined recent developments in anthropological genetics, archaeology and paleoecology and how these findings inform us about the original migration to the Americas, as well as the human occupation of the former land bridge between Alaska and Siberia, known as "Beringia."Read more at: 
Abstract
Until recently, the settlement of the Americas seemed largely divorced from the out-of-Africa dispersal of anatomically modern humans, which began at least 50,000 years ago. Native Americans were thought to represent a small subset of the Eurasian population that migrated to the Western Hemisphere less than 15,000 years ago. Archeological discoveries since 2000 reveal, however, that Homo sapiens occupied the high-latitude region between Northeast Asia and northwest North America (that is, Beringia) before 30,000 years ago and the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The settlement of Beringia now appears to have been part of modern human dispersal in northern Eurasia. A 2007 model, the Beringian Standstill Hypothesis, which is based on analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in living people, derives Native Americans from a population that occupied Beringia during the LGM. The model suggests a parallel between ancestral Native Americans and modern human populations that retreated to refugia in other parts of the world during the arid LGM. It is supported by evidence of comparatively mild climates and rich biota in south-central Beringia at this time (30,000-15,000 years ago). These and other developments suggest that the settlement of the Americas may be integrated with the global dispersal of modern humans. Doug Weller talk 15:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  new paper on "Beringia and the Global Dispersal of Modern Human"
Talk:Oliver Goonetilleke

message: Article has been edited in the temp section, to remove any reference to potential copyrighted material.
*Temp page moved to main article. RedWolf 05:35, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:5th century

message: I added a few more names to the Significant Persons list (Alaric I, Aetius, St. Patrick)
"According to the Book of Mormon, Moroni buries the Golden Plates and ends the record around 421.": should these types of non-historical, more religious entries be permitted? I find it a little odd that this is found among these other researched, substantiated historical references - regardless of the "according to the Book of Mormon" qualifier.
* In the overview section of this article it states "In 476 the last Roman Emperor, Romulus Augustus (nicknamed Augustulus "Little Augustus") is deposed by a Visgothic warlord." In reality the person who deposed Romulus Augustulus was Odoacer, who was not Visigothic or a warlord. He was Ostrogothic, and a Roman foederati. I will make the necassary corrections. --Lucius Sempronius Turpio 00:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: "the extremely important province of Africa" ?  It's an enormous continent that deserves more attention than one sentence about Carthage.  And "Africa" was never a "province," so even that language should be adjusted.
Oh boy, this is rich! 
You should pick up a book every now and then, boy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:818:E928:6C00:BC6F:7FBC:39C1:720D (talk) 02:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurocentrism 