lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kneading (cats)

message: If the term "pundling" was really just made up by someone in a TV studio audience, it is not a well-enough established term to be the title of a Wikipedia article. The articles on Cat and Cat communication refer to this behavior as "kneading". Since Kneading is already an article about what you do to bread dough, I recommend moving this article to Kneading (cats). If no one objects, I'll move it in a few days. User:Angr 00:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be my second choice. My first choice would be "pussy footing"! ;-) Rfrisbietalk 02:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, no one's objected, so I'm moving it. User:Angr 20:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I've heard it called "milk treading."  In fact, that, kneading, and "making biscuits" were the only terms that I'd heard before. —Qit el-Remel (talk  •  contribs) 01:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just wanted to say that I removed a whole "paragraph" in the "References" section, mainly because it was quite uncalled for, and that it looked as though it wasn't based on anything 'solid'. Plus, it was very badly written, and so I thought it might have been better to just remove it altogether. Here's how it read:
"Another word for a cat to kneed is also called pussy footing this motion is ussaly agansit a human when other cats are around. They other cats(if there are other cats around)will feel jelousy or frusration against the pussy footing cat." Seigneur 18:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed something 

message: Is the only reference you have regarding this behavior the one posted?  Perhaps a few more would be more solid. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.24.204.64 (talk) 19:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Cat tenderizing and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 29#Cat tenderizing until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cat tenderizing" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:2006 United States Senate election in Florida

message: I reverted an edit in which Brian Moore's party affiliation in the election was changed from Independent to Green Party.
According to the Miami Dade Green Party website, "The Green Party of Florida (GPF) has endorsed the independent candidacy of Brian Moore in his bid for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Democrat Bill Nelson."  The U.S. Clerk of the House website with the results of the election lists Moore as "No Party Affiliation".
The GPF's endorsement of Moore may have caused the misimpression that he ran as a Green.
--Ammodramus (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brian Moore and Green Party 

message: The article states (correctly) that Will McBride is not related to Bill McBride, but then Will McBride's name is linked to the article for Bill McBride.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:AEB7:64C0:D9D1:7854:2C92:D136 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  McBride confusion 
Talk:Simon Says (film)

message: This article previously previously had copy+paste stuff from http://www.upcominghorrormovies.com/movies/simonsays.php. If we actually have permission, then we may be able to put the text back, but the attribution would have to be redone in line with other ones. Palfrey 20:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Why is this tagged as not notable?  Crispin Glover is enough of a phenomenon that if he did an ad for laundry detergent people would probably want to know about it.  I searched for the page hoping some Wikipedian would have had info about the release status--it's listed on IMDB as having come out in 2006 but doesn't appear at all on RottenTomatoes or Amazon.com.  I'd like to know what happened here; it's not hard to get a cheap, fun horror movie with a decent name in the lead role into theatres, so I suspect there may be a story to it.  Develop the article, don't delete it for non-notability. PoetrixViridis (talk) 06:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Brian Gillen

message: This page is complete garbage. Has not a single citation or reputable source.
Shoddy grammar and spelling.
Name is not even correct -- should be Brian Gillan.
Rosemary's Baby 01:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 2

message: *Main page mentions: TFA or DYK.
**Tropical Storm Larry (2003) and Tropical Storm Henri (2003) were on the main page in June.
**Typhoon Patsy (1970) was too.
**Hurricane Floyd is TFA for June 17.
*I think we should have a "light" story of some description.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other content

message: ===SotM===
*TS Alberto
 Tropical Storm Alberto was the first tropical storm of the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season. Forming on June 10 over the western Caribbean Sea, the system moved northwestward as a disorganized tropical depression due to dry air and wind shear. It passed to the west of Cuba, dropping heavy rainfall of up to 17.5 inches (445 mm) on Cuba and 22.7 inches (577 mm) on Grand Cayman. The rainfall damaged 37 homes and destroyed 3 in Havana. It strengthened over the Gulf of Mexico and attained tropical storm status on June 11. The center reformed to the northeast near its deep convection, and Alberto reached a peak intensity of 70 mph (110 km/h) before weakening and hitting the Florida Panhandle on June 13. Alberto dropped heavy rainfall over Florida, causing heavy, yet benificial rainfall in places to combat wildfires. The storm also indirectly caused one death when a pilot crashed near Tampa due to poor conditions. Across the southeastern United States, the storm dropped heavy rainfall, peaking at 7.16 inches in Raleigh, North Carolina. One boy drowned when he ran into the flooding. Throughout its path, Alberto spawned 16 tornadoes.
Throughout the entire globe, there were three other tropical cyclones. Tropical Depression Two existed in the eastern Pacific Ocean from June 3 to June 4 near the coast of Mexico. It dropped heavy rainfall from 10 to 12 inches (250-300 mm) near Acapulco. Tropical Storm Jelawat lasted from June 26 to June 29, having formed in the South China Sea and made landfall on China. The storm caused heavy flooding which killed at least seven and destroyed 190 houses. At the end of the month, Tropical Depression 04W existed over the western Pacific Ocean. It is forecasted to intensify to typhoon status.
===MotM===
Nominations close and voting starts on June 30
*Jdorje- He got this whole project together, and really deserves some recognition. He was repsonsible for much of the categorizing that exists today, along with some good articles, namely FA 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominations for next edition

message: Nominations close and voting starts on June 30
*Jdorje- He got this whole project together, and really deserves some recognition. He was repsonsible for much of the categorizing that exists today, along with some good articles, namely FA 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MotM
Talk:Robot Carnival

message: two points:
- I'd like to get rid of the comment:
"The visual style of this segment was heavily influenced by the classic music video for A-Ha's "Take on Me". "
No citation was ever given and it sounds like a personal opinion.
- I think some of the plot summaries could be more detailed, and their format could be cleaner and more uniform.  I could expand on them myself if no one objects.  It would also be nice to give some info on it's availability, it's airing on the sci fi channels saturday morning anime block, and the current lack of a Region 1 DVD for the movie. 
Phillosmaster 21:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm cool what that. I think you might just want to add a "citation needed" for the Ah-Ha thing, but I agree that some of the plot summaries could be fleshed out  198.6.46.11 (talk) 17:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleaning up the article 

message: Prequel to it yuu mean sakura wars....... that ! prequel!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.116.66 (talk • contribs) 01:09, 2 July 2006
This film was not a sequel to anything. -- Jason Palpatine 01:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled Comment

message: People here and on ANN keep calling this a film, but everything in Japanese I've read (including the Japanese wiki) says it was an OVA.  Was it shown in theaters?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.181.19.53 (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If the bit in the article regarding Carl Macek is correct, the US release had its segments reordered to optimize the number of film reels on which it was distributed.  So it is definitely a "film" -- as in "something that was shown on film".  This implies a theatrical release in the US, and IMDB seems to confirm this with release dates.  No release dates for Japan, though, so it's entirely possible that it was OVA there.  75.73.102.40 (talk) 22:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A film?
Talk:Evanescence EP

message: People need to stop saying that the EP was released privately. It was released with Bigwig Enterprises as the label. See the artwork for yourself:
http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/2011/002by7.jpg
"DISTRIBUTED BY BIGWIG ENTERPRISES" Right there on the bottom! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gyakusetsu (talk • contribs) 15:31, 16 April 2007   (UTC)
:Hold on a second.  My understanding is that Bigwig was not their label, just the company that assisted in the distribution of the early stuff.  None of the work was their copyright, unlike the current material.  AKA, I don't believe label = distributor.  Look at Fallen for example: Wind-up is the label, however it was distributed by BMG Distribution (subsidiary of BMG Entertainment). -- Huntster T • @ • C 23:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: BIGWIG!!!
Talk:Sylvester Croom

message: The intro paragraph indicates that Sylvester Croom was awarded something posthumously, but he is still alive.  I am just passing through and don't know what the recognition was all about or the circumstances, but something clearly is amiss here and requires attention. Fjbfour (talk) 13:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Posthumously' ?
Talk:Kenseiden

message: "Disponible" is not an English word. Can the author of that paragraph check the word again?
* It means "available" and it is used in Romance languages. The author may have been a Brazilian, as the Master System was very popular there. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo 

message: Waitaminute, Nobunaga is the Master Warlock? Ah, well, not like I've got an SMS to play it on.
--70.240.93.157 (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler
Talk:Larry Smith (American football coach)

message: The section should probably include a mention of Arizona's upset of top-ranked USC in (I think) 1980. MisfitToys (talk) 01:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call.  I got it confused with the 1978 upset on USC by Arizona State (which caused the split title that year between USC/Alabama). I checked' USC's media guide and the game you're looking for is in 1981check the season box on the in-text page 94.  How weird it didn't come up in his obits. I'll see if I can't also find a contemporary news item. --Bobak (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arizona

message: Article lacks content regarding subject's personal life during his career, all of which seems to be included in one short paragraph. It should probably be integrated in to the relevant sections and expanded. But, without it, article still qualifies as a Start. John Carter (talk) 21:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: With respect, I believe that the submitter is looking for an improvement from Start. Apart from the problem you highlighted, I know that his death is recent, but there is absolutely nothing in the article about this, bar the date of death - the article therefore appears incomplete for a non-living person. May I suggest this be considered for further rating when information has been added to that effect? Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 23:08, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Judd Winick/Archive 1

message: Judd Winick has been criticised by comic book professionals (notably Frank Miller)...
As usual, Wikipedia includes an article alleging specific behavior by an individual with absolutely no citation whatsoever. Small wonder no one takes this project seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.67.134 (talk • contribs) 06:22, 16 June 2005
:SO, we obviously have someone at work here( who keeps RE POSTING this old bio) who hates Judd Winick for his inclusion of gay characters and/or HIV + stories.
:AND he/she can't even get their BS correct. Frank Miller hasn't been critical of Winick. I believe the poster is referring to MIKE Miller comic book artist, born again christian, and has been known to shoot his homophobic mouth off on the internet. Including attacking Winick( who he had worked with) for doing stories involving gays.
:Whoever is reposting should just stop. you bring the website down.
:—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.15.153 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: No citation

message: * First of all, whoever, keeps putting that weird italics formatting around my photo credit in the caption, please stop doing that.  It looks horrible.  I removed it.
*Second, while I'm not the one who put the "no sources" tag, I did remove the passage about the criticism from gay groups because it was not sourced.  I appreciate the fact that two citations have been placed in the article, but they do not deal with this assertion, leaving it unsourced. I haven't deleted it again, but we should have a discussion on its source.  Also, of the two citations, only the link for the second one takes you to a page that confirms the asserted quote.  The first one, however, does not, and I'd like to see a resolution on these two points (the unsourced assertion and the first footnote whose linked-to page doesn't contain the word "execrable.")
*Why in the world was the mention of Pedro and Me deleted from the Criticism and Praise section?  I restored it.
*Even more bizarre, the order of the mention of Mia Dearden and Terry Berg were inverted, so that the Berg passage came second, even though that storyline came three years before the Dearden one.  What's up with this?  I changed the chronology back.
*The mention of the three GLAAD awards was also deleted for some reason.  I restored them, mentioning the first with the Pedro and Me passage, and the second and third for the GL work, since that's what Winick received them for.
*The description of the Terry Berg attack was  a bit more detailed than necessary, so I streamlined it slightly.
*Apropos of nothing, I'm planning on expanding thte article (and Pedro Zamora's) by creating sections on their Early Life and Life on the Real World, based on Pedro and Me and The Real World Diaries, just as soon as I get around to it. :-)Nightscream 08:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: My Two Cents, and Changes I Made
Talk:Joe Glenn (American football)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Burzmali 21:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:SS Petersburg

message: The article claims that SS Petersburg is "berthed at the docks in Portland Oregon... on the same pier as USS Hornet". However, Hornet has been in Alameda, CA since at least 1998 and, prior that, was mothballed at Puget Sound Naval Base, WA.  Google Maps satellite view doesn't currently seem show any ship resembling Petersburg berthed at either Portland or Alameda (imagery dated 2019 in both cases). Dricherby (talk) 12:37, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested.  ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS)  14:05, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: SS Petersburg (T-AOT-9101) →  – only ship of name, per WP:NC-SHIPS no need for disambiguation Llammakey (talk) 13:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 April 2023
Talk:Battle of Dalrigh

message: I propose moving this to "Battle of Dalrigh" since this is how the location is now known, it is the name I have seen more often, and it avoids confusion with the better known Dalry in Ayrshire. PatGallacher 19:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. When I saw this article come up ages ago, I contemplated moving it to Battle of Dail Righ (what Barrow calls it), pretty much the same as what you are proposing. If anyone wonders why Dalry is confusing, see Dalry, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I suggest that it is somewhat POV to describe this as a rebel victory.  Who the rebels are can be a matter of opinion.  At the time many people would have seen Bruce as a rebel, against either John Balliol, who many would have regarded as the legitimate king of Scotland, or the English, the de facto government of Scotland at the time. PatGallacher (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Rebel victory?
Talk:Whole Internet User's Guide and Catalog

message: Possible images for article:
* http://viola.org/img3/twi_cover.jpg
* http://viola.org/img3/twi_main.jpg
I’m not sure if permission can be obtained (i.e. having someone at O’Reilly releasing it to the public domain) to host it on Commons, but in the meantime perhaps it could be hosted locally. Jim Grisham (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Sahagún

message: :fr:Jean Francois Joseph DeBelle died in Saint-Raphaël 15 juin 1802, or :fr:César Alexandre Debelle in Spain from 1808 to 1809 ? 
Darkan 07:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DeBelle death year? 

message: Still a start I think, but very close to a B. The WP:LEAD needs expanding; it needs to completely summarise the whole article. Other than that, looking good. It is a bit short though? Any areas for expansion? Regards. Woody (talk) 22:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milhist assessment 

message: Ballad of the 15th Hussars
As we lay in our quarters
Which you quickly shall hear;
Lord Pagent came to us and 
Did us prepare
Come saddle your horses 
For we must ride soon
For the French are now lying 
In the town of Sahagún
So we saddled our horses
And away we did go
Over rivers of ice 
And o’re mountains of snow
To the town of Sahagún
A Course we did steer
For the 15th hussars 
my brave boys never fear
They formed themselves up and the play it began
Thinking to his mind my brave Englishman
But with glittering broad swords upon them we flew
They’d whipped their reigns round and away they did go
Amid the snow and the vineyards many Frenchmen lay dead
Three hundred were taken the rest of them fled
Their general likewise we took to the field
Twas the 15th Hussars who made the Frenchman to yield
Lord Pagent came to us and this he did say
I thank you 15th for your valor this day
Now dismount from your horses and feed everyone
So we’ll be ready to fight them again!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.75.98 (talk) 15:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  here is the lyrics to the Ballad
Talk:Battle of Dathin

message: Isn't this supposed to be considered a stalemate? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.167.194.115 (talk) 21:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  stalemate 

message: All the text is missing. 71.171.89.90 (talk) 02:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?
Talk:Battle of the Masts

message: The Crescent symbol does not represent Islam. It's the symbol that represent the Turks and only became widely use during the reign of Seljuk Dynasty in the Middle East around 11th century. Prior to that, Muslim's army carry a black banner to battle. The current use of star and crescent in the Islamic country's flag today doesn't have anything to do with being an Islamic country as much as paying homage to the Ottoman Empire, the last Islamic empire in the world. 202.60.56.232 (talk) 02:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Crescent????

message: muslims had no navy up to 650 A.D how could this naval battle could took place in 634 A.D ?????? Mohammad Adil 12:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What the hell it is ....????

message: Of course they did. Syllaeum was not a total crushing defeat. Besides, Arabs were excellent ship builders - they did give rise to the empire of Carthage. So they must have had a naval fleet. Tourskin.
:Oh wait a minute. Damn you're right. What the hell? Vandalism has occured. The date is definetly not 634 AD. It should be after 677 AD becuase thats when Syllaeum took place. Tourskin.
:"Empire of Carthage" - you mean the Phoenician Carthaginian Empire? They were not Arabs.104.169.39.45 (talk) 07:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes they did

message: Well I changed the date to > 677 becuase that would make the campaign box look stupid if an earlier battle was placed later in the series. I looked at some websites and it claimed a loss of 500 Greek ships. This is highly unlikely, considering the Byzantines were able to use their navy at 717 AD again and that Syllaeum had defeated the Arabs. Tourskin 17:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed

message: As "That Al-Sawari" is not a place name, shouldn't the article's title be the translated English form, i.e. "Battle of the Masts" as per WP:ENGLISH? That's how I've seen it in English books, at any rate, and I seriously doubt anyone in the non-Arab speaking world would use the Arab term. Regards, Cplakidas (talk) 14:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Removed most POV and unreferenced material (although I didn't remove the quoted text, hoping that someone will soon provide a proper reference). Alleged numbers of combatants and casualties can be brought back to the article, if properly referenced (Arab-only forums, and forums in general, are not considered reliable references). Same applies to the battle details. Dipa1965 (talk) 23:19, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just found that all unreferenced stuff was copy-pasted from Mukarram Ahmed, Encyclopaedia of Islam, Anmol Publications, 2005. Not a scholarly work it seems. Additionally, I removed the aforementioned correspondence. It is irrelevant to the battle. Dipa1965 (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

text: These made up numbers were introduced with this edit. Removing.--Dipa1965 (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major cleanup performed
Talk:Impressions de France

message: For some reason the first two albums refuse to point to the articles, even though they are there.
Ok, they are working now. --blm07 09:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack problems 

message: Corrected reference to Saint Saens organ symphony. Excerpt from film is from fourth movement, not the second. Cited source. 75.16.86.194 (talk) 07:18, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected soundtrack section 
Talk:Sam's Lake

message: "Intense" and "frightening" are subjective. I'm not taking the time to redo this either. That's a true Wikipedian's job. 98.198.83.12 (talk) 05:20, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewrite is inorder
Talk:Galactic Attack

message: Galactic Attack is linked to by Sir-Tech and it was indeed a game written by them ... however, the game Sir-Tech made bears no resemblance to RayForce at all.  I'll update the page, but provide a link to Rayforce in case somebody is looking for that game. dougmc (talk) 17:58, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  not really a dupe