Talk:Hybrid open-access journal

message: As 12.149.241.66 has an obvious interest in the subject, and so do I, I'd appreciate it if that user sent me an email so we  could discuss things. Anonymity will be protected. DGG 18:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont think the fees are encyclopedic material--prices and similar matters are almost ever included in articles. I'll remove them if there is no further commentDGG (talk) 07:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I agree with DGG; there isnt much point trying to maintain prices here. John Vandenberg 10:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With John's agreement, I have just removed them all. The publishers web sites are the place for them.  DGG (talk) 01:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be useful to give an indication of the costs involved, given that these costs can be referenced to a reliable secondary source.  I agree that an ad-hoc poll of publishers websites should be avoided.  I note that the article processing charge article has this kind of information.  Best wishes.  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 08:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it would be useful to give a indication, but it is hard to do that briefly, because it can vart. The current fee for Cell is $5000, ands imilar jvery high quality ournals have similar  fees.  DGG ( talk ) 10:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article processing charges 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hybrid open access journal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060501002050/http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00001179/ to http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00001179/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hybrid open access journal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140602195247/http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/%40policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtp055910.pdf to http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtp055910.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080404012804/http://www.aspb.org/pressreleases/oaformembers.cfm to http://www.aspb.org/pressreleases/oaformembers.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Talk:Open_access_journal#Open_access_taxonomy_and_metrics might be helpful to expanding this article. -- Beland (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of open access projects which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 02:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of open-access projects which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 13:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: I have made some changes to this rather out-of-date article, but it still needs work. In particular
- The Origins and Uptake sections could so with some more evidence and filling out
- There is much more that can be added to the Criticism section, notably adding in points that led to formation of Coalition S, and publishers' rebuttals
- Institutional Responses - much more could be added here in how universities and funders have responded (in Global South & Global North)
- Perhaps there should be a separate section on consequences of Plan S  
Xcia0069 (talk) 18:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections still requiring work