File talk:ChristianityBranches.svg

message: ERROR! This diagram splits ancient Christianity into Orthodox and Roman Catholic whereas in reality, the Orthodox Church has not changed and Roman Catholicism split off from it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.183.138.1 (talk) 13:25, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

message: I'm using IE, and I think many readers are, but I can't read the text in yellow. The background is dark grey. This is a known issue with PNG transparency in IE, as far as I remember, so I found an older version that I could see properly, and hit 'revert', but no changes seem to have happened.
... I dunno what the problem is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blacklite (talk • contribs) 02:30, 2 April 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess I did. I thought I'd tried every trick to get it to work again. It looks fine now, though. Blacklite 10:00, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transparency & my revert 

message: I'm wondering whether or not it would be useful to continue the timeline further down so that we get a more comprehensive picture of the Christian family tree, including movements such as Weslyianism (sp?), Pentecostalism, Mormonism, etc.    - Daniel Zylstra (Dec. 13, 2005)
:If so, such a timeline should be a completely separate or new image, not an edit or replacement of the old one. -Silence 14:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the diagram extend further down the timeline? 

message: It looks like people have figured out a way to put hyperlinks on an image. This would improve this image a lot, and was the original motivation for the text version of this diagram, as I remember. Compare  and the tool Labelled Image Editor. -Colin MacLaurin 19:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links in image 

message: How come the image that was used from 2007 change all of a sudden. Now all the branches of christainity is shown as offshoots from Roman Catholic Church. Even Oriental Orthodoxy ?, What connection would the churches in Ethiopia, India, Armenia (Oriental Orthodox) have with Roman Catholic church, to depict these as offshoots from Roman Catholic Church in AD431. In AD431, the people of Rome, wouldnt even have heard of places like India and Ethiopia ????? Yethi (talk) 12:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right; I'm reverting it now.  The editor should not have done what was done. Tb (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I've made the change on the Wikimedia Commons. Tb (talk) 16:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone is playing with the chart. 117.97.56.104 (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change in Image  

message: (claimed separate lineage) + (Wycliffe+Hus) + (Great Awakenings)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/8/8b/20070115073401!ChristianityBranches.svg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bd/ChristianityBranches-2.svg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/8/8b/20110107073927!ChristianityBranches.svg
--89.176.227.251 (talk) 17:33, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  good new lines to apply 

message: Do not know where or how to put this. I am sure someone can put it in the right place. 
The Early Christianity line should actually be Catholic and the Roman Catholic line should also be called Catholc. The Catholic Church was the first Christian Church. As you can see on wiki (List_of_popes) history has agreed that the Catholic Church go back to Jesus making the Apostle Peter the first Pope.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.72.190 (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Rubbish. I can also say that you can look on wikipedia and see the Patriarchs of Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem. They go down to the apostles as well, including Peter. In Constantinople, the first bishop was the Apostle Andrew the first-called, brother of Peter. In Alexandria, the first was Mark the Evangelist. In Antioch, (this one will be such a surprise!) the first was PETER THE APOSTLE. And guess what, he was bishop there before he was in Rome. Now, in Jerusalem, the first was James the Just, the brother of the Lord. Now, you go here and try to tell everyone that the Roman Catholic church is the "true church". Well then I should be able to counter you and say: "Why do you disobey the primacy of Peter, ignoring Antioch as they left the Roman Catholic Church?" If Peter's throne is truly the mark of infallibility, then a paradox occurs when Antioch and Rome disagree as they were both founded in large by Peter. So go away with your fanatical Roman Catholicism (perhaps it should not even be called that, esp after Vatican II... is it even a church anymore?) Anyway, don't bother with this junk you are imagining, I may as well go here and complain that Roman Catholic should be changed to "Papists".75.73.114.111 (talk) 14:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 2

message: Why Arianism is omitted here? -- Bojan  Talk  03:44, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Extinct It no longer exists today (except indirectly via, e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arianism 

message: Would it be possible to rename Assyrian to Church of the East please for more neutrality? Not every Church in this branch considers itself Assyrian. Many Thanks. 2.101.110.79 (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Assyrian churches Can you provide some context for this claim? What do you have in mind? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly, for example, the Persian Church, Nestorian Church, and the Ancient Church of the East do not consider themselves Assyrian. Assyrian is quite a specifically nationalistic term associated with Assyrian nationalism. 2.101.130.173 (talk) 01:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation Do you have any proof for this? I've read about the Assyrian church and I don't know of any problem that schismatic churches have with the name. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Church of the East]] 

message: Should we add a merge line from Anglicanism to Western Rite Catholics?  Some number of Anglican Churches have merged with the Roman Catholic Church in the recent past under Personal ordinariates.
Ittiz (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Personal Ordinariate]]