lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1911 Atlantic hurricane season

message: Map inclusion is a great idea for the pre-satellite era, like what was done with the first three storms.  At least two more should be able to be added for the last couple storms, no?  Thegreatdr (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As I recall, for the three remaining storms the issue was either that the storm didn't come within range of the NOAA central library maps or there was simply nothing worth looking at on the surface analysis. I'll take another look, though. Juliancolton (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Found another source for decent surface maps. I'll upload them shortly. Thanks for the reminder/suggestion. Juliancolton (talk) 21:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a problem.  Inconsistency can plague GAN/FAC candidates.  Best to nip it in the bud early.  At least for an article this old, there shouldn't be copyright restrictions on images included.  Thegreatdr (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Understood. I got the maps for #s 4 and 5, but for TS 6 the most impressive map available consists of one broadly closed isobar. Would you say it's worth adding? Juliancolton (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For consistency sake, yeah.  It was a relatively weak tropical storm, so it's not going to look impressive.  Thegreatdr (talk) 01:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Map inclusion
Talk:Theodoros Pangalos

message: Citation needed for Pangalos's 1950 political platform. And the comment with regards to his grandson is completely POV, and therefore out of place.
I've moved this article to Theodoros Pangalos (general) because most refferences (even the wiki-links) use Theodoros Pangalos for the member of PASOK. +MATIA  ☎ 22:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it rue he was an albanian (arvanite) speaker? We know that his mother was Arvanite, but father from greek speaking island of Keos.--188.167.108.66 (talk) 15:35, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Albanian speaker

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  02:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note:  is currently a disambiguation page, so I have added an explicit destination for it. Since there are only two pages disambiguated there, it could then be tagged with  for deletion if not expanded after a reasonable time.  SilverLocust 💬 18:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not necessary. With only two possible articles, the dab page would simply be deleted, which is implied by the original proposal. Station1 (talk) 06:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 August 2023
Talk:1909 Atlantic hurricane season

message: I created Grand Isle Hurricane of 1909 as a redirect to this article for now, but I think it is a storm of enough significance to deserve an article eventually. Any other suggestions for the title, or is this as close to a standard name as it has? -- Infrogmation 23:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. I'm surprised this doesn't have an article. That name works. Hurricanehink 02:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grand Isle Hurricane of 1909

message: I upped it to start, seeing as it does have mention of every storm. For any higher, it needs at least one paragraph of each storm. Hurricanehink (talk) 13:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:1907 Atlantic hurricane season

message: Can somebody make a new one? The dates are out of order on that one we have.HurricaneCraze32 21:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats a mistake by NOAA in the track map. TS 5 was in November (same dates).--Nilfanion (talk) 21:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks-i'm trying to extend this article-except that map messed me up- like my work so far?HurricaneCraze32 21:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Track Map

message: Due to the lack of modern technology, including satellite imagery, information is often sparse, and four additional systems could have formed during the season. A documentation for four possible storms during the season exists, although it has not been proven that these systems were fully tropical. Can we have a little more information here? A section on "possible other storms" would be good, telling where, when, and the evidence for each storm.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.153.40.58 (talk) 16:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other storms
Talk:1906 Atlantic hurricane season

message: Is the Emma J. Cottingham somehow significant? We don't have an article about her, and she barely registers on Google. And surely there were other ships sunk too so why mention only this one?. How did the storm only contribute to the sinking (as against cause it)? Needs explaining. Moriori (talk) 02:51, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, thanks Moriori. HurricaneFan25 | talk 14:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs explaining

message: *29.59 inches, lowest known pressure for Tropical Storm One
HurricaneFan25 17:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes
Talk:1899 Atlantic hurricane season

message: Structure. Jdorje 02:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now more detail...--Nilfanion (talk) 01:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:1898 Atlantic hurricane season

message: Structure. Jdorje 02:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:1895 Atlantic hurricane season

message: How can Storm2 be the strongest at 110 mph, when storm5 reached 120 mph? Jdorje 00:11, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because storm5 was weaker than storm2... Unisys shows that, and is up-to-date with re-analysis information. Hurricanehink 00:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well then the article is wrong when it says storm5 got to 120 mph!  Is this information coming from the monthly weather review?  I think that's where you've gotten most of your information, but we need to merge in data from the best-track too (UNISYS uses the best-track, as does my track-map-generating program; see s:Atlantic hurricane best track).  I suppose what we need is a way to interpret the best-track and upload it to wiki-source in a legible format, with links.  But then I guess that's what unisys already provides. Jdorje 00:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see. Well, I didn't do this article, but based on this, I would guess many old seasons have this problem. I can't do this right now, but this should be fixed eventually. Hurricanehink 01:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strongest storm? 

message: Base histories on best track. Jdorje 05:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo
Talk:1894 Atlantic hurricane season

message: More info per storm, pictures, sources. Jdorje 02:14, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:1891 Atlantic hurricane season

message: That table can't stay. We need the infobox. Season summeries need to be added. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde 22:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Infobox seems to have been added. I added storm summaries (deaths are hard to tell, so none have been noted) under a new column "Notes" in the table. Is it okay now? NSLE (讨论) \<extra> 10:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storm summeries 

message: I moved it to the bottom cause it was interferining with the summaries. I fixed the table of contents error.HurricaneCraze32 20:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: That Table & Interference Problems

message: More info on storms; make table consistent with the 100+ other seasons. Jdorje 02:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Get the numbering correct, they should be numbered from 1 to 10.--Nilfanion (talk) 01:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:German Cross

message: Isn't the german cross also a name for the sign of German Bundeswehr? Like the sign right of the 98 here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Euro_luftwaffe.jpg
:The Bundeswehr uses the Iron Cross as its official symbol. You are referring perhaps to the Black Cross. The Iron Cross and the Black Cross are both descended from the cross of the Teutonic Knights, but I can't see the Bundeswehr calling its symbol by the name of a Nazi order. --84.58.216.182 01:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Could someone please point me to the Reichsgesetzblatt that inaugurates the German Cross in Gold? Many references I find point to 28 September 1941 as the date is was inaugurated. However when searching the archives near this date or on this date I only find two legislations RGBl. I S 613 pertaining to the second change to Iron Cross (adding the Swords and Diamonds), and RGBl. I S 614 referring to the War Merit Cross. Neither of both legislations fit to the German Cross in Gold.MisterBee1966 10:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: Isn't saying that it had a "rather gaudy design" a bit un-NPOV? -- MacAddct  1984 (talk •  contribs) 15:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.--WooteleF (talk) 12:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually it was considered gaudy by some German soldiers. I'll have to figure out which book I read it in, but in an officer's war memoirs he states the soldiers referred to it as "Hitler's Fried Egg". Repeter (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read about this gaudiness and the nicknames it acquired in a number of places, most notably in Antony Beevor's book, Berlin: The Downfall 1945.  There are also a few web sources, as well, such as this one, this one, and this one.  Cyberherbalist (talk) 05:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaudy?
Talk:1864 Atlantic hurricane season

message: I changed the target for this redirected article to the 1860 Atlantic hurricane season, as its previous bot-generated redirect target of the 1864 Atlantic hurricane season was just plain weird. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:1840s Atlantic hurricane seasons

message: W.P Fuller says the storm parelleled the coast. This article says it made landfall. I would like to know where to get documentation on landfall. Thans.User:Mikereichold | User_talk:Mikereichold 20:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1848 Hurricane 
Talk:1830s Atlantic hurricane seasons

message: We should really think twice before adding this reference into any of our tropical cyclone articles.  It is chock full of errors.  Click here for a review I gave of the book on Amazon almost seven years ago.  Thegreatdr 19:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: David Longshore Encyclopedia of Hurricanes, etc.

message: *Palm Beach Post article, which includes tracks. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link for filling out 1837 tropical cyclone information
Talk:Erica (plant)

message: Please copy the taxonomy into wikispecies 
But what I would really like to know is, where did the name Erica come from? Why is it called that, I mean? 91.105.62.65 11:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I switched around the wording a bit where the discussion mentions heather, since that is actually a different genus.  But since there is some overlap in name use, I left the usage in.  PerlKnitter (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heather 

message: Is not mentioned. It is considered an important ecological (for determining floral association) and apicultural species, at least in Greece.--Draco ignoramus sophomoricus (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erica manipuliflora 

message: There is a mistake in Gledhill's book: the authors who used the Greek word ἐρείκη were Aeschylus and Theocritus, not Theophrastus. Check Liddell-Scott.--Carnby (talk) 18:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theophrastus 

message: For consistency with the statement in the lead of the article Erica carnea, that name should
be used here in the image caption.  Plantsurfer 08:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Erica herbacea

message: If I read the lead of the article I come away with the impression that they're basically the same, but according to the rest of the internet there are differences.
Heaths: Erica / heather: Calluna
Needles / hairy scale leaves
Small / medium-size
More winter hardy / Less so
Some bloom winter to spring / tends to bloom in full summer
The internet notes though that within the families there is considerable variation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 09:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heath vs heather 

message: Bruckenthalia is a synonym of the genus Erica. The Bruckenthalia article should either be merged or renamed as Erica spiculifolia Kazamzam (talk) 19:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Bruckenthalia]] into [[Erica (plant)]]
Talk:Vienna station (Washington Metro)

message: Owing to the closure of the "temporary overflow lot" at the corner of Saintsbury and Vaden Drives near the South Garage, we now have outdated information in our article about the number of parking spaces. Thus why I've added the  tag to the article. Metro has not yet provided us with new numbers for us regarding number of spaces, so there's not much we can do yet at this point.
Additionally, plans for a third parking structure are allegedly in the works, based on signage presently at the station. If I can find a good source for that, I'll incorporate it into the article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Parking numbers needing an update

message: JoshEdgar 23:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I think I see now that the  tag shouldn't be removed now because the update was needed because of parking. But, these are my updates if anyone needs to know about them JoshEdgar 23:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edits actually show up automatically in the page history. Not bad, though I did clean it up a bit. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates?

message: There has been discussion at User talk:SchuminWeb#Dashes regarding how Vienna/Fairfax–GMU should be formatted per WP:DASH and WP:SLASH. What it boils down to is, does the difference in punctuation types create two units, one multi-word and one single (i.e. formatted as "Vienna / Fairfax–GMU" or Vienna/Fairfax – GMU"), or are the different punctuation types irrelevant, and we have three single-word units (i.e. Vienna/Fairfax–GMU)?
I'm taking the discussion here because I'd like to get a wider opinion on how people think we should treat the different punctuation types. What do folks think? SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting per [[WP:DASH]] and [[WP:SLASH]]?
Talk:Việt-Võ-Đạo

message: Việt-Võ-Đạo is not a collective term, it is used the first time to indicate the philosophical part of the Vovinam, used by Master Le Sang, that become "Vovinam Việt-Võ-Đạo" .
Later in 1970s in Europe the term was misused for indicate such a "collective term" .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.88.251.144 (talk) 02:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong information

message: This article serves 2 purposes:
# It  prevents single vietnamese martial arts schools from claiming the name "Viet Vo Dao" - as has happended multiple times
# It says "Viet Vo Dao is a vollective term used to cover a number of similar vietnames martial art styles". It then directs to those styles.
Therefore this article does not need any more content. The remaining infomration can be fond in the addressed articles.
Thomas 10:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "insufficient context"

message: Not sure why Vota redirected to this article as the term is not listed anywhere. I changed the redirect page to VOTA and placed an Otheruses4 tag on that page just in case people get lost. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?
Talk:East Falls Church station

message: Regarding this revert, sure there is. It's the unincorporated community east of Falls Church. See List of unincorporated communities in Virginia and Falls Church, Virginia. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 07:10, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: NB: Both of those articles are entirely uncited, and defining an "important population center" seems difficult. In this case, however, I grant that "Arlington-East Falls Church" exists, as indicated by the Arlington PD district listing and the associated civic association. In practice, I feel talking about "East Falls Church" as a community to be confusing. Common usage just isn't there; Googling it shows that there's a park of that name, but not much else other than spammy real estate sites. LFaraone 14:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert 
Talk:Clarendon station

message: I don't know if the stairs bit is notable for Clarendon specifically. Let me explain what I mean...
Metro is a little weird with its use of actual stairs. The newest stations all have them, in addition to escalators. The older stations have them somewhat sporadically. Capitol South, for instance, also has stairs from street to mezzanine, but it's far deeper than Clarendon. Then Waterfront-SEU has stairs from the mezzanine to the platform.
How this should be treated, I'm not sure, but I think discussion of Metro's use of stairs belongs as a section of Washington Metro vs. here. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Off topic, but I had no clue Capitol South had stairs. I used that station for 3 years, but I lived on the south side of it, so I took the elevator every single day. (And it broke once and I had to crawl out while the elevator was still 5 feet above the ground :( ) --Golbez 15:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep... three escalators, and a set of stairs. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stairs tidbit
Talk:Minnesota Avenue station

message: Is this a good article to note that the surrounding area is in development and give details or is there another article that would handle it better?Killemall22 (talk) 18:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that the article for the neighborhood that the station sits in would be more appropriate. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: area in development
Talk:Braddock Road station

message: Technically, Braddock road is at grade level, and merely on a large, Earthen Berm with the CSX tracks. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe "above ground" in this case just means "not underground".  But yes, you are correct.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Above Ground?
Talk:Pentagon City station

message: The supposedly abandoned stairwell in the Pentagon City station has seem to come to life recently, although I never paid enough attention before to notice whether it used to look like this too. There are lights on in front of it as well as a sign which says 'canopy construction underway'. This is the same sign which was placed at the other two entrances when the canopies were being constructed there, but those are both complete. The sign says the completion date is something like July 31, 2006, but I don't remember the lights on before, so perhaps they'll re-open that stairwell? Rmeskill 17:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw this, too, and took a few photos of it. I just saw it literally minutes ago (I'm posting from the Apple store at Pentagon City Mall), and the lights are on, and there's some equipment down in the bottom there, as well as lots and lots of debris. I read somewhere that it is supposed to reopen. I've got the link bookmarked somewhere at home, so you'll have to wait for a source on it. It was somewhere on CommuterPage, though, if I'm not mistaken. So yeah, it's supposed to reopen to the best of my knowledge. And that sign about canopy construction is still there as of today, and really needs to be removed. Someone should put a bug in Tangherlini's ear about that one... SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And here's the link: Pentagon City Pedestrian Tunnel Repair Project SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Abandoned' stairwell?
Talk:Pentagon station

message: The “Station layout” section shows a table of four rows labeled G, 1F, 2F, 3F.  To me, it seems as if it's describing four levels, from G (which it labels “street level”) through three underground levels (1F, 2F, 3F).  But the actual Pentagon Station only has two underground levels, as described in the article text immediately following the table.  Is the table in error, or is there a style convention here that isn't obvious to the casual reader?   Unician ∇  08:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The line after the table states that the trains are on two separate levels; this doesn't mean the mezzanine can't be on another level. It doesn't specify "two underground levels" that I see. --Golbez (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Exactly — the separate table rows and sequential numbering suggest that there are three underground levels, which is incorrect.  Is there a convention among articles about WMATA Metrorail stations that the mezzanine should be listed on its own line, even if it's not on its own level?  (This confusion occurs on a number of station articles, so it's not just a question of making a quick edit to this one.)   Unician ∇  20:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station layout 
Talk:Interstate 240 (Tennessee)

message: There has been a bit of an edit war on the I-269 page, with the dust settling on a claim that Wikipedia should not recognize the extension of the interstate designation as official until there is documentation that TDOT has recognized the change, even if federal approvals have been granted.
This begs the question: for I-69 in Tennessee, is there any documentation in support of TDOT recognizing the designation as official?  It's obviously been approved by AASHTO and FHWA; TDOT is almost certainly going to sign it as such if/when the new sections get built.  But at the moment, I don't see any documentation that TDOT officially agrees that the overlap section of I-55/I-240/I-40/SR 300 really is I-69 today.  There's just a bunch of internet lore, much of it referencing Wikipedia, that TDOT will sign it "someday".
(This comment is being added all of I-40/I-240/I-55/TN 300.  More detail on I-269 talk page.) MikeTheActuary (talk) 04:54, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-69 Overlap - How Official Is It?
Talk:Interstate 240 (North Carolina)

message: In the History section, there is no source for Thomas Wolfe's comments about Bon Marche and Beaucatcher.  The only source I've found on the web is this article.  Unless anyone has a non-circular source, perhaps this should be removed from the article. --Twistlethrop (talk) 08:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any verifiable sources for the Thomas Wolfe anecdote, and Ted Carter's "Hercules and Thor" story, I've removed both of them.Twistlethrop (talk) 06:38, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas Wolfe, Bon Marche and Beaucatcher
Talk:Interstate 240 (Oklahoma)

message: Aside from a reference for a ceremonial designation, the route description is wholly unreferenced. Additionally, the first paragraph of the history doesn't seem to be supported by either of the two other references in the section. – TMF 03:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: Is there anyway that someone can edit the interactive map so that it shows the extension of I-240? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 03:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing interactive map