Talk:Alfred von Schlieffen

message: Strengthen the right wing........  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.130.104 (talk) 08:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is a great start to what could be a longer article.  The article has good content however it could use more information.  There is a lot of information that is missing that could be added.  In the Biography, it skips over big gaps in his life.  They're not major issues but there could be more about Alfred Von Schlieffen's life, about him growing up.  I also think that much of the information in the Biography section could be moved into it's own section about military.  There were a couple facts about the amount of time he spent in the Prussian army and in the Austro-Prussian War.  There could also be a lot more information about his role in the military which would help with creating this new section.  The article could use some work in regards to content but so far I believe it's a great start and has all the basic information about Alfred Von Schlieffen.--Nsteblin (talk) 04:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. This is a solid start-class article. There are several references listed in the article which indicates further information could be integrated into the article to make it more comprehensive. maclean (talk) 05:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfred Von Schlieffen Critique 

message: Having a map of the invasion plan with captions in Vietnamese (or whatever that is) in the English Wiki isn't particularly useful. Is this what brain-damaged U.S. "IP" policy has brought us to?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.187.52.255 (talk) 08:14, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Need a map with captions in English

message: There was a number of minor formatting issues that I addressed, I'll be documenting all other changes I make to the page here. Carobu (talk) 17:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting Issues

message: This whole section reads as an opinion piece, and is poorly cited. I'm considering removing it simply because it doesn't deal in the realm of fact, but opinion. It really looks like someone wrote a paper on him and then copy and pasted it into here. If no one can add citations to this I'm going to chop it out in a week. I'll do some digging of my own to citations to back up said statements. But that still doesn't change the underlying issue that most of it seems to delve into opinion. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Carobu (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Influence

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alfred von Schlieffen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311025853/http://cgsc.leavenworth.army.mil/carl/resources/csi/Cannae/cannae.asp to http://cgsc.leavenworth.army.mil/carl/resources/csi/Cannae/cannae.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As stated in the note, should his name be "Graf Alfred von Schlieffen" rather than "Alfred Graf von Schlieffen"? Karl Bildungshunger1965 (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graf as title?